HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-22 eMarch 15, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
g2411 NOTICE OF MEETING
h...:014186
mailingC. Box 8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Vsleg C4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
92728.8127
44 Ell.4 venue WEDNESDAY, March 22, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
ipe44 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA
S270B-701B
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Agencies
•
cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Gordan erova Boa d Secr
HununBton Beech ry
Irvine
Le Habra
! Pe/me
On Alamitos
Newport Beach
onenge
Placen['a Tentatively - Scheduled UDcomina Meetings
Banta Ana
Beal Beach
Santon
ruadn JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
Ville Perk
Vance Linde SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday, March 20,2000 at 5:30 P.M.@OCWD
county or orange JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Saturday, March 25,2000 at 8:00 a.m.
Scales, Dlstrits.
Costa Mesa OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 5, 2000 at 5:00 p.m.
Midway City
PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,April 6,2000 at 5:00 p.m.
Water Districts
Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 12,2000 at 5:00 p.m.
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Date to be determined @OCWD
STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,April 26, 2000 at 5:00 P.M.
-To Protect the Public Health and he Environment through Excellence In M teweter Systems"
mn
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
April April 26, 2000
May May 24, 2000
June June 28, 2000
July 'July 19, 2000
August August 23, 2000
September September 27, 2000
October October 25, 2000
November `November 15, 2000
December 'December 20, 2000
January January 24, 2001
February February 28, 2001
March March 28, 2001
*Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
H:1wp.dWadminSSAgendaU000 MMUrg NOOMSAMN3.3.d.
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 03/22/00 TIME: 7:00 p.m.
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON..................... —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ ✓ —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD........................... % —
(CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. ✓ �/ —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.....................J/ ✓ —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY........................... ✓ ✓ _
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE................... .— Ca_ — —
(MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. ✓ —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................✓ �G -
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................✓ i —
(SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON...................
— —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ i —
(DALY)............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ �G —
(LUTZ)............................_CAC GHI6A I ................ ✓ �G —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... ✓ —
(RICE)............................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ _
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ i —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ �L —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................
� —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ —
(MAULLER)...................... SIGLER.........................
-
-mmff Y-eWdem.-.......... SILVA........................... —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ ✓ —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA.........................✓ ✓ —
(BLAKE)............................ ....................... —
STAFF: �
Anderson ✓ / ykyl
Ghirelli ✓ r .I�
Kyle ✓
Ludwin ✓ p
McIntyre Fs "
Miles
Oaten ✓
Tomko ✓
Streed ✓
Tuchman ✓
OTHERS:
WeeAroff� ✓
Andrus
03/22/00
H:My.dle�edMn�BS\DIRECTOR%DPedon oicadw
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
2 d -A /0, BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) (please print)
�ieA,%V 604r1 uy CD/r
N:YIP.DTAA=N=W0RMS%=WN FORM.DDC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District to be held on VlAu A- a J. , 20 6, was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on e /J 20dO
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
�j✓( /�(
Penny M. K Kt , Secret
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
\\RADON\DATAI\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
March 15, 2000
abm,e:
n141962-2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
n,.m,y aaa,.a.:
90. Box B127 Subject: Board Letter
F ntem Valley.C
92728-B127
°°'°t atl°ena: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
1O9 Ere aytrue
9 Y Y 9
F rchn vanay.rn information on any of the items, please call me.
927087018
David Ludwin Receives Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award
mamba,, The Orange County Engineering Council recently presented David Ludwin, our
Aba,aata Director of Engineering, With a Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award. The
• award is presented annually to those engineers who have significantly contributed to
Okla, the engineering profession, their community and the environment. David received
,,,harm the award at the Orange County Engineering Council's Engineering Awards Banquet
Brea held on February 261". The annual event is held during National Engineers Week,
Beene Pan which is observed in February in honor of George Washington, engineer and first
L�°fe55
Foume,n Valley president.U. S. David was also conferred the title of"Fellow" by the Institute for the
Fmrartan Advancement of Engineering for outstanding service to his organization and the
car"," r3nve engineering community. David's 22-year career in engineering includes service in
Huntington Beech
1 yra both the private and public sectors. He has served as the District's Director of
La Habra Engineering for the past four and one-half years.
Le Palma
Los Marc..
Newport Beach Low-flow Toilet Program Update
Orange - -
Precanba Since October of last year, 19,101 low-Flow toilets have been distributed free of
sans ana Y
Seel ee.tn charge throughout Orange County. Of that number, 529 were distributed in South
Stanwn County and 18,572 were distributed in our service area. This will make an important
Tustin
Yil. P.,* impact on flow reduction.
Ycrb. Linda
County of Orange Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Examined by Technical Experts
Under the auspices of the USC Sea Grant Program,a panel of technical experts from
sanitary Districts around the country in the areas of microbiology, hydrodynamics, oceanography,
Coerce Mae. outfall design, and coastal water quality was convened to conduct a technical review
Md.,Cty of the summer 1999 Huntington Beach closure investigations. Dr. Steven Weisberg,
Water District. Executive Director of the Southern California Water Research Project, chaired the
panel. The panel met for 2-1/2 days (Feb 28, 29, Mar 1)and heard presentations
1'.xa Han`" from agency representatives involved in the investigation, toured the affected area,
and presented its preliminary findings on the final day. The panel's charge was to
critique the work that was done during the summer, provide recommendations for
improving the response to future events, and suggest planning and research
priorities.
.To Protect Me Public Heairh and the Bnvumnrrerrc a ugh Emegence a wastewater Systems
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 2
March 15, 2000
The overall observations of the panel:
♦ commended the agencies for an extensive effort and robust investigation and the
high level of response in a short time period;
♦ the Orange County coastline is one of the most well monitored and protected
(from a public health viewpoint) in the country;
♦ last summer's investigation set a very high standard for future investigations of
this sort(more than $2 million was spent, mostly local funding). Other areas may
not have the resources or expertise to do what we did and may require state and
federal assistance to undertake such an effort;
♦ the high level of interaction among agencies was a key to success.
Critique of the investigation effort:
♦ didn't look at urban runoff issues early enough in the investigation; the focus
remained on a possible sewage leak because OCSD was the lead agency;
♦ early on in the investigation, testing should have been done to distinguish
between human and animal bacteria (using virus testing, speciation of bacteria,
DNA tests)as a way to pinpoint the source of the contamination;
♦ onshore transport of the ouffall plume and ground water are unlikely sources of
the contamination;
♦ in preparing for future events, there is a need to develop and have in place
contingency plans with defined roles and responsibilities of each agency;
♦ events of this nature should be viewed as watershed issues, and as such,
sanitation agencies may not be the logical choice as lead agency in future
investigations. OCSD has a mixed mission: to protect public health and
undertake due diligence to show it's not our problem. That focus may have
distracted the interagency effort from taking a broader look at other possible
sources in the watershed;
♦ a research agenda was developed,focusing on the need to develop new testing
methodologies and sanitary survey procedures.
USC Sea Grant will prepare a report containing the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the panel. The report and its"lessons learned"will be a
valuable resource to stakeholders involved in the Huntington Beach incident and
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 3
March 15, 2000
other coastal cities, agencies, and public interest groups that may be faced with
similar events.
Estimated total out-of-pocket costs for the panel will be less than $25,000.
Several articles on this subject are attached to this letter.
Regional Water Boards Under Attack
A recent audit of three of the state's nine regional water quality control boards—in
Los Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento—found them falling behind in carrying out
their responsibilities to enforce the NPDES program under the federal Clean Water
Act. The audit, conducted by the EPA Regional Office in San Francisco, cites
problems with the water boards' performance of core regulatory functions, such as
permitting, inspections, enforcement and monitoring. A similar critique of the Water
Boards' performance at a February joint hearing of the Assembly and state Senate
environmental and budget committees found similar problems, citing the Boards' poor
record in reducing polluted stone runoff and nonpoint source pollution. The Natural
Resources Defense Counsel has filed suit, asking EPA to take over enforcement of
the storm water program in California.
Some of the problems can be traced back to the economic recession of the early 90's
and the regulatory backsliding that occurred as a result of budget cuts at
environmental agencies during the mid-90s. Staff-intensive programs, such as
enforcement of NPDES permit violations, suffered as the Water Boards directed
shrinking resources to controlling toxics in ground water and the cleanup of leaking
underground storage tanks. This year, the state budget added resources for more
inspectors and nonpoint source programs and further increases may be on the
horizon.
Articles reporting on these events, from The Wall Street Journal/California, Long
Beach Press-Telegram, and Los Angeles Times, are attached.
Directors Workshop Scheduled on the Groundwater Replenishment System
On Saturday, March 25 between 8 and 11, the Directors of the Orange County Water
District and Orange County Sanitation District will have an opportunity to review the
progress of the GW R project and to discuss some of issues in more detail with staff
from both agencies and the project consultant. We strongly urge you to attend, as
the information provided will help you with future decision-making regarding this
project.
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 4
March 15, 2000
1 have also attached a copy of the March 1, 2000 letter that discusses the project cost
estimate and a copy of a memorandum from IN Pickler, OCW D Director and Chair of
the GWR Joint Coordination Committee, that lists the public outreach contacts.
OCSDISAWPA Monthly Coordination Meetings
The first meeting with SAW PA was held at the District on February 17. Included in
the attachments is a copy of the minutes from that meeting. As you can see by the
minutes, there are many issues that impact both agencies, and this monthly meeting
will help reach consensus through face-to-face exchange.
Designing for Healthy Watersheds Seminar
Attached is a letter invitation from the County of Orange Planning & Development
Services Department for two two-part seminars on restoring and enhancing our
watersheds. The first series is scheduled for March 16 and 23 at the Osborne
Building in Santa Ana, and the second will be held at the Dana Point Harbor Youth &
Group Facility. If you are interested in attending, please contact Mike Wellborn at
(714) 834-2486, or e-mail at wellbornm(a)pdsd.co.orange.ca.us. There is no
charge for the seminars.
Odor Complaints
Attached is a table that logs odor complaints received about Plant 1, Plant 2 or the
Collection System, and indicates whether the complaint was plant related. This
report will be routinely included in future Letters to the Board.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald .9Mclnlyre
General Manager
DFM.jt
H\WP DTnwDMxlt IDrWIE RS TOT E 90MPil0'4]]Iu0 DOC
Attachments
LA Times Pagel of 2
CC L!ill.(.C"
-elf. Me. Home I Discussions I print Edition I Archives I Site Nap I Home Delivery I Advertise I Help
Nem Business Sports http://v .Latimes.com/editions/orange/200DO302/t000020326.htmt
PoIIHa Travel Commentary
Entertainment Classifleds ShossDin•
mJic -Wift an, 1016 nines, Back t0 story
TV,reslaursn cars,renal
Thursday, March 2, 2000
Experts Criticize Dirty Beach Closure
a Lengthy Huntington shutdown could have been avoided if tests had been done
earlier, scientists say.
By DAVID REYES,Times SItl1 Wrher
Contamination that closed Huntington Beach for more than two months last
summer might have been cut short if a county task force had used some key tests
earlier, a panel of experts concluded Wednesday.
The panel of microbiologists, oceanographers and environmentalists concluded
a three-day review of the beach closure and subsequent investigation as part of a
program sponsored by USC's Sea Grant Institutional Program for environmental
studies.
Panel members heard presentations from task force members, including the
Orange County Sanitation District, which spent more than$1.5 million
investigating the contamination that closed the beach, hurting the city's economy
and spoiling its image as a haven for surfers. The panel also made
recommendations for handling future incidents.
One mistake investigators made in tracking down the source of the
contamination was not testing sooner to determine if the bacteria that caused it
came from animals or humans.
Suspecting it might come from human waste, officials spent much time and
effort looking for sewage leaks. Eventually, however, they concluded the
contamination was caused by a combination of urban runoff and animal waste in
the Talbert Marsh.
Had they identified the bacteria sooner as coming from animal waste, officials
might have diverted water from the marsh into a treatment plant, possibly
allowing the beach to reopen sooner, experts said.
Additionally, tests for water-borne viruses and also DNA fingerprinting should
have been ordered during peak bacteria levels in July after investigators knew
from samplings that they were high in June, panelists said. This could have helped
pinpoint the cause of the contamination.
"I would have started virus testing in July when they had hits and hits of high
bacteria," said Joan B. Rose, a panelist and professor in the University of South
Florida's Department of Marine Science. "When you have a biological problem, it
http://www.latimes.com/cgi-biiVprint.cgi 03/02/2000
LA Times Page 2 of 2
behooves us to do virus testing.
"There's plenty of sophisticated tests out there that could have been conducted
and weren't," she said.
Panelists also recommended the county adopt a better plan for handling a
major "biological event" such as the Huntington Beach contamination.
With the sanitation district in charge of the investigation, the closures were
conducted under a presumption the bacteria was caused by sewage, said Stephen
B. Weisberg, director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
"There is no implication that the sanitation agency did anything wrong,"
Weisberg said. "But in planning for the future, should the sanitation district take
the lead?We see a potential negative because they have a different mission."
Weisberg said hundreds of holes were punched in the ground and dozens of
sewage pipelines were cleaned out and checked for sewage leaks and not other
sources such as urban runoff during the early stages of the investigation.
"But if the Orange County public facilities agency was in charge, they might
have targeted the Talbert Marsh earlier as a potential source," he said.
The 25-acre wetlands preserve is on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway
at Brookhurst Street. It attracts thousands of migratory birds and other wildlife
each year, part of the Talbert watershed that encompasses 12 square miles in
Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Channels in the marsh have earthen walls
that allow absorption, while marsh sediment is tainted by animal waste.
Ocean water flows into the channels during high tides and then back out,
flushing marsh sediment that is carried to the shoreline less than a mile away.
. a +
Beach Closure Revisited
Experts say the two-month closure of Huntington State Beach last summer
was caused by urban runoff and bacteria from animal waste.
http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/printcgi 03/02/2000
Cleaning Up Our Beaches Page 1 of 2
,r
�-nLCiC Home I Discussions I Print Edition I Archives I Site Map I Hone Deli"q I Advense I Help
News Business Sports SUMay.Marts 12.20001 p Print thisstory
Politics Travel Commentary
Entertainment Classifieds Shopping
music movies.an. ions,nomes.cars. Cleaning Up Our Beaches
Tu reslaurams remain
Specialists in marine biology offered some
Commentary valuable suggestions this morlth to Orange County
TOP STORIES officials in the event of another beach closure
•Strengthen UCI Medical School because of pollution.
•Cleaning Up Our Beanies Environmentalists,oceanographers and
•Bus Route Changes wont'HeigR_ders microbiologists said one early step is to determine if
MORE the source of contamination is bacteria from
News Sports Calendar Live' animals or humans.
Business High Schod Home Design Last August,county officials thought the
Commentary Sports Safety Zone bacteria in the waters off Huntington Beach were
caused by humans,the likely result of a sewer leak.
Classifieds Finn a name.oar,rental.d cek n,acnaMrte. Finding the source of the leak became a priority.
auction.Dour.acne o RV Place an Ad g P ty.
Subsequent testing produced little but
See mi,.cek s Print Edition Advertisements frustration. Eventually the investigators concluded
MMISI INIEWM that the contamination resulted from a combination
Books caumnisM C o sm d of urban runoff and animal waste in Talbert Marsh.
Food o ftlAtOn HoiescLessor Learning Leaning the source sooner could have allowed
Hgalth ob�aries Loney
Hghway 1 Spence Traffic officials to divert water from the marsh into a
Real Estate special Reports weather treatment plant rather than having it flow untreated
So.Cal.Living Times Poll SITE MAP to the ocean,the usual practice.
Sunday opinion Reading by 9 The diversion might have allowed the speedier
BUY MOVIES AT REELCOM reopening of the beach at a time of peak demand.
I�r�rW M rue - This month, USC's Sea Grant Institutional
„0.n,r,� -EF-- G.1 Program for environmental studies sponsored a
program that included a three-day review of the
beach closure and investigation of contamination.
FIND YOUR The marine biology specialists heard presentations
' • • DREAM from county officials,including those of the Orange
• VACATION County Sanitation District,who tried to identify the
source of the pollution.
It's good that county officials took part in the
study sessions even though they realized that some
of their actions might be criticized.
Beach closures unfortunately are becoming more
frequent in Southern California, including Orange
County.Until they can be stopped, learning how to
minimize the effects is the best course of action.
Also worth consideration is the suggestion that
http://www.latimes.conVed itions/orange/commenV20000312/t000023830.html 03/13/2000
Cleaning Up Our Beaches Page 2 of 2
an agency other than a sanitation district be in
charge of hunting for the source of pollution. That '
might open investigators to a wider range of
possibilities rather than focusing on human
contamination for too long.
In January, county supervisors approved
spending more than $460,000 to help divert urban
runoff from storm drains. Keeping runoff from
ocean waters can be a big help in keeping the
beaches open.
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for
similar stories.
You will not be charged to look for stories, only to
retrieve one.
RELATED.STORIES 1
News Business Sports
POati Travel Commentary Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times
Entertainment Classifieds Shopping
music,Ima .. s o Rome..cats,
7Y.its rentals
is
fl ' t
hftp://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/com mentt200003l2/t000023830.html 03/13/2000
Beach merchants divided on closure study Page 1 of 2
�—net r4: Home I nisaimons I Pnnt Enid A r iS S'1jaM9D I HH= D jW ry 16dver!1"1 Hip
News Business Sports Thursday,March 9,2000
Politics Travel commentary
Entertainment Classifieds Shoop ng News from Huntington Beach in the Times Community
music.mn,,e,ad, jaU.ho Newspapers
L/.mataunint Nals
Beach merchants divided on
closure study
OC Beach Cities ■Expert panel says last summers four-mile beach
TOP STORIES closure could have been handled better by city,
• Firm Hire tl Despite Its Missteps county.
• Traffic Forecaster GetS Pee t Despite Past Erg�r
esi Inster By ERON BEN-YEHUOA
MORE
Community Papers Resources HU TINGTON BEACH--Beach
News by Area Home Prices,
School Profiles Rentals concessionaires are split about whether officials
-- who investigated last stmmtees ocean
Classifieds AM a hq�fir,mnial,toe.Qet.merchandlss contamination could have reduced the time the
aualon coat.oiane P Rv Place an Ad shores were closed off,despite a recent report
see nos.eeKs Print Edition Advertisements suggesting critical tests should have been
cworssxnroonr performed sooner.
Rooks Cmum9inus crossword. The findings,made by a panel of experts at a
ERO Eduquhm Homer 3 pe meeting in Newport Beach last week,prove that
Health obituaries LohaN officials dropped the ball by waiting more than
ReatEdv t swoe, Weath two months during the peak tourist season before
Reuel E�st�tg $pa9al ReQortS WeaUgr
so.Cal.Uyino Times Poll SUE MAP recommending swimmers return,said Mike Ali,
idaY0pinlon Reading by_9 owner of Zack's Pier Plaza and two other beach
BUY MOVIES AT REEL.COM sods.
rue . "They took their sweet time,"he said.
�EE�� Movie F But that attitude is nothing more than Monday
1.k r R J morning quarterbacking,said Sack Clapp,owner
of Dwight's concession stand.
Before Igo out... "That's easy for them to say now,"he said.
_ "Everybody was trying to do the best they could."
�1 The panel of oceanographers,microbiologists
and hydrologists concluded that officials should
tvww.edandpnrve.eom have tested earlier whether the high bacteria levels
were due to animal or human waste, said Phyllis
Grifman,who runs USC's Sea Grant Program,
which sponsored the event.
By assuming the cause of contamination was
human waste,they spent too much time searching
for sewage leaks,ignoring urban runoff,she said.
Zeroing in on runoff from the start would have led
officials to the Talbert Marsh,which collects some
http://www.latimes.com/communitiestnews/oc_beach_cities/20000309/thb0001719.html 03/10/2000
Beach merchants divided on closure study Page 2 of 2
of the untreated waste water that flows from _
streets and lawns before spilling out into the
ocean, she said. A recent study,performed by
UCI, showed the marsh might be largely
responsible for the pollution problem.
But during the summer,when bacteria levels
soared as much as 10 times above normal,
"nobody looked at the marsh," she said.
One of the officials in charge of monitoring the
beach during that period agreed that more could
have been done sooner. Ever since the runoff was
diverted into treatment plants,the levels of
bacteria have not come close to their peak levels,
said Larry Honeyboume, chief of the Orange
County Health Care Agency's water-quality
section.
But Honeyboume points out that the precise
cause of the contamination remains a mystery
even now.
'Tm still scratching my head," he said. "So are
a lot of people."
I Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times
for similar stories.
You will not be charged to look for stories, only to
retrieve one.
RELATED STORIES /
News Business Sports
Politics Travel Commentary Copoght 2000 Las Angeles Imes
Entertainment Classifies Shopping
xu_ss.0»0 e% en. Ms.Nn,es. .
U.sslaumm ren els
1 ,
i I 1 Ij
111
http://www.latimes.com/communifes/news/oc_beach_cities/20000309/thb0001719.html 03/10/2000
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL/CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2000
standards for pollutants'it the absence°[
_✓ aPlU.f.,sst,.gelnuentlimns make ftex-
icult for the
n.
$4.ACE ally distinct regional boards tine o Issue per-
Water Boards r mits to industry and other dischargers that
} 904 C, ._ consistently apply the same criteria.
Seen as Slow 4� ' •Municipal s o m-wet&N., i s don't
con language ed scrrus exactly whet
couwi..r Ax2 pollman—-Is can be Ilsaarteeto�ieSEE9t, '
wpni B`a+b ors and Da s.
Problems
_vc w2 a ono boards fail toroulinel send
On 1 roblems tee staff, will focus on how well the re, copies of permits antl inspection reports to
'onal water boards are a orr—F mi—e me EPA,making it all but impossible for
re lam [one i ns at could directly federal officials to monitor state antipollu
By Marc L ssmsit ect public health antl safety, such as tion activities.
SWfAe s`071'e w.w.srnxeva... .� permit issuing,inspecting and monitoring *Discharge reports aren't reviewed
SACRAMI MI O—CalBornia's'unwieldy of water quality. quickly by regional boards to ensure that
system for pmtecdng water quality is Legislators, especially, will be rater- dischargers comply with permits.
struggling to overcome serious deficfen. esled in discovering what new Initiatives •Field -inspections, especially of
cies. Including a lack of statewide Stan- are antler way after the walle"wiily bait. storm-waterdischarges,aren't as frequent
dards for toxic pollutants,lapses in Inspire- get was Increased by $15.3 million this anaas omug as needed.
lions and reporting and failure to collect year.And that funding Is only a down pay. •Federal antl state roles—which re.
stiff penalties,according to a recently re, ment on new appropriations Bowing Into quire monetary allies forvlolating per.
leased formal review by the U.S.Environ- the Water Resources Control Board, raft restrictions to be set high enough to
mental Protection Agency. thanks to good economictimes and DeMM- site it financially punishing for polluters
The report focuses on the performance relic control of both the governors office to not comply—are being ignored.
between 1995 and 1995 of Wee of the state's and the Legislature: Gov. Gray Davis is Some Flexibility
nine regional water-quality control asking for an additional $17.2 million for by. yickox says he has made Increased
boards—in Los Angela, San Diego and the fiscal year beginning July 1. and r.HIcknl says a has made
increased
Sacramento—In carrying out their feder- The EPA's statewide conclusions sub and
enfotesurces madeead omerstthe e
ally designated responsibilities to enforce stantlally who a number of earlier studies of his
the EPA's National Pollution Discharge done by the Legislative Analyst'601Dce,the ments that regulate air,Witter and toxic pol-
Elimination System .Program antler the Bureau of State Audits and twomen-govern lution.He says he's told the regional water
Clean Water Act.The findings show that menial environmental advocacy groups. boards that they mall employ "fair.
the nine boards and their parent agency, "These issueshave been festering for along thoughtful and consistent compliance and
the stale Water Resources Control Board, time,"says Mark Newton,author of a 1999 enforcement to ensure them 1s a level play-
have made some recent progress,but they Legislative Analyst's Office study of slate mg field far business...and to make sure
need to do much more to make up for regu- and regional water-board Program. "And that the regulated community realizes that
latory backsliding in the early 1990s.Back it took,perhaps.a few external audits,as these rules and the health-based considers-
then,a severe economic recession led Re- well as the lAgislature,to give Ithe water dons that underlie them are appropriately
publican Gov. Pete Wilson to order deep bperdl a push."The new money,however, Implemented and need to be enforced."
budget cuts at environmental agencies. seems to have given the board"momentum Mr. Hickox adds that working with
'I Would say that in many areas there is for making improvements,'he adds. business to ensure compliance should be
room for improvement despite all the well- These findings are "old news," says more effective in cleaning up the environ-
intended efforts;says Michael G.Schulz, Winston Hickox,secretary of the Calffor. ment than just relying on the assessment
associate water division director at EPA's ilia EPA. of heavy fines.
regional headquarters In San Francisco. Indeed,the series of critical audits have That attitude has been the position of-a
He says stale officials dealt with limitedr& come as no surprise. In fact, they were majority of the Iregionall boards"in the
sources by performing a sort of triage In hued on data,now at least IS months old, past, says Valerie Nera,director of agri-
deciding which parts of federal programs provided by the state and regional boards, culture and resources Issues for the Cali-
would be fully Implemented and which says Walt Pettit,the water board's excel- fornia Chamber of Commerce In Sacra-
would get a"D-mmus"level of compliance. live director. memo.Moreover,she says,all the boards
"They made a managerial decision to do And change is already under way, he should benefit from increased fundinglhat
one part well and let other parts be sasri- says,because"we want to eet back to be- allows them to work through a backlog in
ficed became they auldn't do them." inj more aggressive about solvm mmir- IssuingperMis.
But tougher enforcement,While potent-
Talking It out ems cos e o re c mg....and we ooe kfi
The result,says state Sen.Byron Sher weFE WMe r�rrecov�mr.remt tially beneficial.Ms.Nera acids,needs to be
(D.,Palo Alto),is"real problems not lost s s e s a e a al taaros alreatly approached with some degree of"Eexibil.
p have made considerable progress toward
try thatiscinsistendy applied statewide in
at the stale bar�b3tni'7 e�resiona each of menineregional booms.She'sluok-
names._matn to fixT whittling down a backlog in pollution-dis- iachofthenimanal boards.Dava'src
0 a en , r. sr,w o is chairman charge permits.The backlog now stands at nest to pass lawmakers bill met will v.Davis's
such
of the Senate Environmental Quality Com- only 195 permits out of a statewide total of quad,to to lose new law he signed last
mitt". and Assemblywoman Hannah- 1,724.That's less than half the number of year that calls for new lawmandat he minimum
Beth Jackson (D.,Santa Barbara),chair- permits outstanding reported by me leg- penalties for Clean Water Act violations.
Woman of the[met house's Environmental islative analyst in mid-1998. penalties
some lawmakers say the new
Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, Mr.Hickox acknowledges federal EPA statute, which was sponsored by Assem-
have invited EPA officials to brief lawmak- counterparts in their new review "have
ors on their report at a joint oversight hear- been finding mine Improvements"In addi- blywoman Carole Migden (D., San Fran,
1ng next week.The hearing,shys commit. tion to identifying regulatory troubles. cisce), already is being administratively
s weakened by the water board general
EPA's Gripes counsel's recommendation to give is,
But continuing W build on these Ito- gional bards "discretion" in levying
provemenm will require a heavy attack on "mandatory"fines.
the following deficiencies pointed out by "Thal gives me parse."says Sen.Sher.
the EPA review: "This is doing business the way Ithe water
0 A lack of a statewide water-quality board'l wed todo business."
LA Times Page 1 of 3
AM
��I( rlCrkN�o lined - ♦
4:asus�i1:(.Yd
aasae:� Hvma I IN=ssivns I fiintE4ilma I AMN I saamaa I Hwe ON 1 Admdaa 1 hele
News Business Smrk ht4)9MWWJBO Bs.mMnewsfta 120000225MM18364.hbA
Politics Travel Csommentary
EnIaMlarrim Class'. eds Shhopgioy
must —Am lma mmea. Back to story
JY.maa1�01s 96...Ws
Friday,February 25,2000
U.S. Considers Crackdown on County Runoff
6y MA8 CONE.n"wn Envhnennl Wri
Citing California's failure to adequately protect its beach waters from
pollution,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering forcing the
state to enforce urban runoff cleanup measures in Los Angeles County.
The EPA investigation is a response to a legal petition received Thursday from
an influential environmental group. The Natural Resources Defense Council
asked the EPA to remove the state's authority to enforce runoff rules in Los
Angeles County unless dramatic improvements are made within 90 days.
Speaking in unusually harsh terms,EPA officials agreed that California's
enforcement is inadequate and said they will investigate the specific charges in
the petition.
The state's program lacks critical resources,such as inspectors,for even
minimal enforcement of runoff rules in Los Angeles County required under the
Clean Water Act,said Alexis Strauss,director of the EPA's regional water
division in San Francisco.
"It is the most underfunded regulatory program we've ever worked on, and
we've worked on a lot. It's astonishing," Strauss said. "This is one of our foremost
environmental concerns in California."
Strauss faulted the California Legislature and the governor's office for"an
unwillingness over the years to fund this program." She said the EPA hopes to
work with Gov.Gray Davis to fix the problems and would take control of the
program only as a last resort.
Dennis Dickerson,executive officer of the state's regional water board in Los
Angeles,which oversees the program,acknowledged that he has a limited staff
and budget but said it is unnecessary for the federal government to take over.
Experts say Southern California's runoff pollution is the most severe in the
nation. Storm drains flow directly to beaches,carrying voluminous runoff from
streets and parking lots tainted with virus-laden raw sewage,pesticides,oil and
toxic metals.
After heavy rains,Los Angeles County's entire shoreline, from Malibu to
Long Beach,is rendered unsafe and is closed to swimmers for several days. Even
on dry summer days,water near rivers and channels contains disease-carrying
http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 03/02/2000
LA Times Page 2 of 3
germs and toxic compounds.
Since 1986,the federal Clean Water Act has prohibited allowing anything but
rainwater to flow into storm drains. Municipalities are required to clean up runoff
to "the maximum extent practicable" and business compliance is required. The
EPA granted enforcement authority to the state of California.
But state records show that cleaning up runoff has been a low priority at the
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Thousands of industries,
construction sites and cities in Los Angeles County let pollutants drain off streets
and parking lots,but inspections and penalties are rare.
Dickerson said he has five staffers to oversee about 2,900 industries, 85
municipalities and 700 construction sites. The agency has calculated it needs four
times as many.
Officials of the California Environmental Protection Agency would not
comment Thursday on the petition,which they had not seen. But Cal-EPA
spokesman Edd Fong said Davis has already added 180 positions statewide and
has proposed another increase for the next year.
"We are beginning to turn things around,"Fong said.But little of the new
money has focused on urban runoff. In the Los Angeles region,Dickerson said,
only one staffer was added for runoff issues while the rest went to programs for
traditional industrial pollution and underground gasoline tanks.
The petition includes numerous examples of California's failures to enforce
runoff rules.
"The program flunks in every single category," said David Beckman,a senior
attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
"It's no wonder we have the worst urban nmoff problem in the country,"he
said. "The trash you find at the beach and the fact that beaches are often closed
due to health concerns are directly related to the lack of regulation."
The EPA's investigation could take months. If Administrator Carol Browner
finds California is improperly administering the program,the state then will have
90 days to correct the problems or face withdrawal of its authority, said Ann Nutt,
a senior attorney at the EPA's western regional office.
The petition comes as the Los Angeles regional board is taking its first steps
toward enacting major runoff rules.
Last month,the board required large new developments in Los Angeles
County to capture or treat runoff from the first three-quarters of an inch of rain
during storms. Existing buildings face no mandate,but cities since last summer
have been required to educate businesses and residents about practices to reduce
runoff.
But EPA officials and environmentalists say the regional board does not have
enough staff or resources to enforce the new development regulation or older
programs.
Only 858 of 3,558 industrial plants regulated under the region's storm-water
permit were inspected between 1996 and 1999. The board took formal action to
penalize 37 businesses or municipalities in the 2 1/2-year period, the petition
says.
"At its current pace,it would take the[regional board] nearly 35 years to
perform industrial site inspections at each facility in the region," the petition says.
The petition for Los Angeles County is the first of its type in California and
one of only a few nationally,Nutt said.
http://www.latimes.convcgi-bin/print.cgi 03/02/2000
The following article simply underlines the increasing interest in urban runoff. (SPA)
Officials tackle quality of water
Long Beach Press-Telegram-3/1/00
By Dorothy Korber, Sacramento Bureau
SACRAMENTO-Wincing at a Press-Telegram photo showing a Long Beach marina dogged
with Floating trash, lawmakers sharply questioned water quality regulators Tuesday about the
growing menace of polluted runoff.
"NOW I see what you've been talking about," Fred Keeley murmured to fellow assemblymember
Alan Lowenthal of Long Beach. Keeley represents the Monterey Bay area.
The photo was a visual aid during a hearing convened jointly by four Assembly and state
Senate environmental and budgeting committees. The subject was a critique of the State Water
Resources Control Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards.
State Sen. Byron Sher, a Palo Alto Democrat with a Harvard law degree and a strong
environmental bent, set the tone for the hearing with his opening statement.
'The regional boards have struggled and sometimes failed in their responsibility to protect dean
water," Sher said. "State water policy has careened from crisis to crisis.
"We must repair the significant damage done to water quality over the past decade."
Sher's comments mirror the findings in the Press-Telegram's 1999 series'Troubled Waters,
Hidden Dangers."
Mark C. Newton, the legislative analyst's water specialist, offered the lawmakers a clear picture
of the current situation. He noted that the water quality boards' budget dried up during the
1990s, leading to backlogs in updating permits, performing inspections and punishing scofflaws.
Newton also questioned the boards' low priority for reducing polluted storm runoff"nonpoint . -
source" pollution in water quality lingo.
"A majority of the state's water degradation is due to nonpoint source pollution," Newton said,
but only about 3 percent($15.4 million)of the boards' proposed 2000-01 budget is earmarked
for the problem.
Los Angeles County residents face the worst polluted runoff situation in the United States, said
attorney David Beckman of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
"Los Angeles is a concrete bowl -what hits the ground goes into the water," Beckman said.
'There are two critical impacts. First, the storm runoff is acutely toxic; it kills organisms. Second,
there's a high pathogenic content; it makes people sick. These are not theoretical problems, but
proven ones.
"You could not come up with a worse one-two punch."
Lowenthal noted that the problem is especially grave in Long Beach, which lies between the
mouths of two rivers and is inundated with trash and toxins after every big rain.
When two officials from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board rose to speak,
Lowenthal and other legislators peppered them with questions about polluted storm water.They
were told that only five people are assigned to monitor nonpoint pollution in all of Los Angeles
County.
The legislators wanted to know how much additional money it would take to eradicate the
problem- and how long, if the money was forthcoming.
"Our staff works very hard,"said Executive Director Dennis Dickerson of the Los Angeles
regional board, passing out photos of the Long Beach marina afloat in litter. "You can see we
have a daunting task on our hands."
Repeatedly, Keeley and Sher prodded Dickerson for definitive answers.
"I'm asking you: To do the job, how many new people are necessary?" Sher said.
Dickerson reckoned that 30 new staffers would do the job. "What difference would we see?"
asked Keeley. Dickerson responded that there is a difference between bureaucratic compliance
with the rules and actual water quality improvement.
"We're talking about a massive, massive problem,"said Lowenthal. "Cleaning this up will take
more than 30 new inspectors."
After the hearing, Lowenthal said he was heartened that his fellow legislators seem determined
to tackle the runoff problem and to budget money to solve it.
"What was so important about the hearing is that budget committees and environmental policy
committees met together at one time," he said. "We're all on the same page-and that's the way
to get the job done."
OCSD-SAWPA Monthly Coordination Meeting #1
Draft Minutes
February 17, 2000
Attendees
Joe Grindstaff, Eldon Horst, Scoff Miller, Don McIntyre, Blake Anderson, Gary
Streed, Greg Mathews, Dave Ludwin, Doug Stewart, Chuck Winsor, Jim
Herberg, Andrei loan
Overview
We met for the first time on February 17, 2000 for the purpose of coordinating the
various projects and activities that impact the two agencies.
It was agreed that we will meet monthly. Even months at OCSD. Odd months at
SAWPA. Third Thursdays. 10 AM-noon.
Status of San Bernardino RIX Bypass to SARI
• 5 to 6 MGD of additional Flow is being discharged into SARI while San
Bernardino cleans the RIX ponds to re-establish their design percolation
rates
• Grindstaff estimates that it'll take SS 12 weeks to be back up and running,
depending upon weather conditions
• SAWPA recognizes that this is causing Flow in the SARI to exceed the 9
MGD treatment capacity right owned by SAWPA SAWPA recognizes that it
is obligated under the 1996 agreement between OCSD and SAWPA to
purchase treatment capacity in the OCSD system when its average
discharge rate measured at the county line exceeds the treatment capacity
right owned by SAWPA. However, OCSD staff also recognizes the unique,
emergency and apparently one time nature of the RIX capacity problem
(assuming for now that this doesn't portend the beginnings of a long tens
problem with the RIX system) and for this reason OCSD staff does not view
this overage as a purchase issue that SAWPA must address.
• Note also, that the pending 2 MGD brine purchase can offset this overage
only to the extent that the overage Is brine discharge from the existing
groundwater desalter operations of SAWPA
Status of Brine Disposal Capacity Purchase
• SAWPA staff will seek authorization from its commission to purchase 2 MGD
of brine (only)treatment capacity on March 13 now that it is in possession of
the contract and OCSD's cover letter
• SAWPA expects to begin utilizing this capacity beginning in approximately 12
months as the Chino desalter comes on line
• SAWPA anticipates the potential need for 2-3 MGD more brine treatment
capacity as the Menefee, Perris and Chino 11 groundwater desalters come on
line. Funding for these additional desalters is dependent upon proceeds
from the Water Bond on the March 2000 ballot.
• Action Required: SAWPA pays OCSD for brine capacity upon SAWPA
Commission approving purchase
Future Models of how SAWPA acquires and maintains capital treatment
capacity in the OCSD system
• We discussed the possibility of using other methods for SAWPA acquiring
and maintaining capital treatment capacity in the OCSD system. Basically,
there's three options: 1.) Existing practice of SAWPA purchasing increments
of treatment capacity in 1 MGD increments, payable over time, in
accordance with the 1996 agreement; 2.)Annualized capital facilities charge
paid by SAWPA to OCSD in much the same way that large users within the
OCSD system now pay OCSD under its 1999 Supplemental Capital Facilities
Connection Charge Ordinance; or, 3.)Adjusted capital facilities equity
participation by SAWPA in the OCSD system in much the same way that the
OCSD revenue areas now adjust capital facilities equity between the
revenue areas.
• Action Required: Gary Streed of OCSD will run models of the three options
to determine their financial implications and convey his results to OCSD and
SAWPA staff prior to the next meeting of the group.
• Action Required: OCSD and SAWPA staff will discuss the relative financial
and political implications of the three options at the next scheduled meeting.
Status of SAWPA's AIP to OCSD
• Action Required: SAWPA will pay OCSD the outstanding invoices owed
OCSD in March 2000
Source Control Issues
• SAWPA mentioned that its member agencies have expressed preliminary
interest in establishing septage dump stations within their service areas.
OCSD staff indicated concern over this possibility. Their are source control
issues implied in the operation of any trucked waste dump stations. There
would have to be a significant effort directed toward unannounced monitoring
of the dump station and an aggressive enforcement program associated with
the operation of such stations. OCSD staff recounted the concern that EPA
has expressed with regard to the operation of a robust and auditable source
control program in the upper basin. OCSD staff expressed its interest in
consistently meeting all of the terms and conditions of its ocean discharge
permit and that accountability and control of an upper basin source control
program is of paramount concern it OCSD. OCSD staff expressed a
preference of having one entity, namely SAWPA, administer and manage
septage dump station(s) in the upper basin
Status of SARI Control Gate Construction at Savi Ranch
• OCSD reported that this control gate is constructed and operational. The
purpose of this gate is to completely isolate the section of the SARI line
downstream of this gate in the event of a catastrophic failure of the SARI line
upstream of the gate. This isolation gate will prevent river water and
sediment entering the OCSD conveyance and treatment system which would
otherwise happen in the event of such an occurrence.
• OCSD staff noted that the gate will not be used as a way to intentionally and
electively interrupt service in the SARI line
Relocation of the SARI out of the flood plain of the SAR
• This 25 year old line has approximately 5 miles of its length within the flood
plain of the SAR. Over time, it has lost much of its cover because of the
gradual downward erosion of the bed of the SAR. This has occurred under
the present condition of peak river flows of approximately 5000 cis which
occur from time to time during storm conditions. Under the vast majority of
time, the river flows at a rate far less than 5000 cfs. In the future,the bed of
the BAR is expected to continue to erode further, causing the SARI line to be
increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic washout and failure.
• If and when Prado Dam is raised and improved, the expected maximum
peak river flow rate will increase to 30000 cis. This six fold increase in flow
will cause the SARI to be more vulnerable to catastrophic washout and
failure.
• For these reasons, OCSD has embarked on a multiple year-engineering and
environmental study to determine the technical,financial and environmental
Implications of relocating one or more reaches of the SARI line out of the
flood plain of the SAR and into the northern side of the river. SAWPA owns
an average of approximately 75%of the capacity of the reaches in question.
The most upstream reach is 100% SAWPA-owned. The most downstream
reach is approximately 50% SAWPA-owned. Preliminary cost estimates
(which will be re-estimated by OCSD later this year)range from $17 to$41
million dollars, depending upon the alternative. OCSD is performing an EIR
that will describe the environmental implications of these alternatives. This
work will be completed later this year.
• OCSD has anticipated the funding needs for the relocation of the SARI line
and is prepared to finance its share of the cost of the project, assuming
funding by OCSD and SAWPA only and in accordance with the respective
ownership ratios of the two agencies of the reaches in question.
Financing the SARI line relocation is going to be difficult for SAWPA.
Assuming funding by OCSD and SAWPA only, and in accordance with the
respective ownership ratios, SAWPA staff estimates that the$17 million
alternative would cause SAWPA to roughly double its existing user charge
rate and a $34 million alternative would roughly triple its existing user charge
rate. For this reason, SAWPA has proposed to the County of Orange and to '
the Corp of Engineers that state subvention grants representing 80%of the
project costs be used to relocate the SARI line in preparation for the
improvements to Prado. SAWPA indicates that both the County of Orange
and the Corp are supportive of this idea. The 20% local share would be
funded by SAWPA and OCSD, in accordance with their ownership shares of
the reaches.There is uncertainty about when subvention funds would
actually become available and whether this project would receive formal
funding authorization by the Corp of Engineers (and, possibly, other
agencies with authority over this question).
• Other grant support was discussed. The California Water Bond, appearing
on the March 2000 ballot is a potential source of funds. There Is money that
will be competitively awarded to projects that meet certain criteria, of which
the SARI line should certainly qualify. However, there is uncertainty
regarding the competitiveness of the need of the SARI line relocation as
compared to other and at this point unknown competing projects
• There is also the possibility of seeking grant money directly through the
legislature. No action on this idea has taken place.
• Action Required: Scott Miller of SAWPA and either Bob Ghirelli or Gary
Streed of OCSD will work together to create a proposed grant funding
strategy and convey It back to the group at the March meeting.
• Action Required: Eldon Horst of SAWPA will set up a meeting between
OCSD, SAWPA and the Corp of Engineers to achieve clarity about the
timing, criteria, and likelihood of the SARI line relocation receiving state
subvention grant funding under the scenario of the Prado Dam Improvement
project receiving Congressional authorization to proceed.
• Action Required: Given the potential increasing vulnerability of the SARI
line to future washout and catastrophic failure, both agencies will consider
developing an emergency response plan for addressing such a failure.
Santa Ana Sucker
• OCSD is addressing the Santa Ana Sucker in part of its effort to develop an
EIR for the relocation of the SARI. Kris Lindstrom, an environmental
consultant, and Andrei loan, project manager for the relocation work, have
primary responsibility for managing the EIR work.
• SAWPA's Mark Norton has project management responsibility for SAWPA's
efforts to address certain habitat management issues related to the Santa
Ana Sucker
• OCWD's consultant Jim Van Haun, Orange County's Mike Wellborn, and
Lindell Marsh,are coordinating the studies and certain proposed habitat
conservation planning efforts that are designed to prevent the Sucker from
being further threatened by activities within its range in certain portions of the
Santa Ana river and some of its tributaries
• OCSD and SAWPA recognizes the need to make certain these parallel
efforts are coordinated in the interest of all parties involved, including the
objective of preserving the Santa Ana Sucker in accordance with the
requirements of the ESA.
• Action Required: Kris Lindstrom will be briefed by OCSD's Bob Ghirelli, as
a start, and then Kris will take the necessary steps to appropriately
coordinate the EIR work of OCSD with the work of the other initiatives
mentioned above. OCSD Engineering will report on the progress to
coordinate activities from its end at the next meeting.
Next Meeting
• Thursday March 16, 10 AM, SAWPA
• Action Required: Agenda item deadline to Peggy at SAWPA, Monday,
March 13, noon
• Action Required: Agenda publication by SAWPA via e-mail, Tuesday,
March 14, 9 AM
Blake Anderson
Groundwater
w Replenishment System
March 1, 2000
Don McIntyre
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Don McIntyre:
As a reminder, late last year the project design team for the Groundwater
Replenishment System began refining the cost estimate for the project. As part of the
EIR/EIS process, a preliminary financial estimate of$292 million for Phase I was
prepared. Following the EIR/EIS process, as a normal part of the project development
phase, we began reviewing and refining the estimated cost.
In December 1999 we established a new project cost estimate of$356 million. This
number is higher due to project changes, a data entry error and inflation. It is important
to keep in mind that the new $356 million project cost estimate for Phase I contains a
20% contingency and is still preliminary. We have many options to lower the cost of the
project without lowering the high treatment standards for the water. Throughout the
project we will continue to analyze our options to lower project costs.
From the inception of the project we realized that the cost of Groundwater
Replenishment System water must be competitive with future imported water. We still
believe we can produce this water for less than the cost of future imported water.
Groundwater Replenishment System water will be the lowest cost new water source
available. It will also be the highest quality water available.
The Boards of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District
are committed to identifying a new source of safe, reliable, pure, drought-proof water for
residents of north and central Orange County. It is too early to say whether the cost of
the project will hinder its development. That is why we are spending the next year
developing and analyzing the viability of this innovative project. We believe that it will
be viable.
Less than $1.5 million has been spent to date on this project. This is a modest amount
for a joint-agency project of this magnitude that has completed the EIR/EIS process and
has begun the project development phase. The agencies have been extremely prudent.
4 joxe error ql 0t r C,"w,e,Da and the Omnge C..,SmdxGm Detm
t7M 378-3200 • Fax(714)378-3381 - 10500 EIIia Avenue • FounoinValley - Califomia 92708
Over the next year project development and preliminary engineering will continue. The
Boards are scheduled to vote on whether to proceed with the final design and
construction of the project In January 2001.
Recently we have been meeting with Gary Robbins, a reporter for The Orange County
Register, to update him on the project cost estimate. We expect his article to run on
Thursday, March 2, and wanted to make you aware. His article is focused on the
increased costs between the EIR rough estimate and the refined cost estimates coming
from the project development phase.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ron Wldermuth, public
information officer for the Orange County Water District at(714) 376-3351 or Michelle
Tuchman, director of communications for the Orange County Sanitation District at
(714) 962-2411,
Please keep in mind that we are still in the very early stages of planning. This is the first
large application of membrane technology for wastewater purification in the world and
there are no roadmaps or examples for us to follow. Cost is obviously a key factor in
the success of this project. We will continue to keep you updated as planning for this
vital project proceeds.
Sincerely,
Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Tom Dawes, Project Manager
Orange County Sanitation District Groundwater Replenishment System
A Groundwater
%w Replenishment System
• Date: February 15, 2000
To: Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee
Orange County Water District Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors
From: Iry Pickier, Chairman
Joint Cooperative Committj�
The public information team for the GGrrooundwa--ter Replenishment System is making significant
strides educating the public and securing support for this important project.
Since 1997,the public information team has made more than 300 community presentations and
secured support from more than 50 cities, chambers of commerce, countywide groups,
environmental and agricultural organizations and individuals.
A listing of some of the cities, organizations and businesses that the public information team has
made presentations to is enclosed, as well as a list of all the endorsements to date.
In the future, I will be providing you with monthly updates on this important project.
Please call Ron Wildermuth at(714) 378-3351 if you would like more information. . .
CC: Bill Mills
Don McIntyre
Michelle Tuchman
Ron Wildermuth
Tom Dawes
A pm e(fan of b,,0--9e Caumy Wale'Dm and d,e Omnge Co-my Smualan Darn
(714)378-3200 • Fax (7141 378.3381 • 10500 Ellis Avenue • Fountain Valley - California 92708
Groundwater Replenishment System
Endorsements
American Water Works Association/Cal-Nev Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Section (AWWA) Kansas Club/Leisure World, Seal Beach
Anaheim Evening Lions Club Kiwanis Club of Cypress
Anaheim Optimist Club Martin Luther Hospital of Anaheim
Blue Planet Foundation Mesa Consolidated Water District
City of Brea Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce
• City of Costa Mesa Orange Chamber of Commerce
City of Cypress Orange County Board of Supervisors
City of Fountain Valley Orange County Business Council
City of Huntington Beach Orange County City Engineers'Association
City of Irvine Orange County Farm Bureau
City of La Habra Orange County Taxpayers Association
City of La Palma Placentia Chamber of Commerce
City of Los Alamitos Rainbow Disposal
City of Newport Beach Rotary Club of Fullerton
City of Placentia Sea& Sage Audubon Society
City of Seal Beach Serrano Water District
City of Stanton Sierra Club Orange County
City of Tustin Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned
City of Villa Park Treatment Works
City of Westminster Southern California Water Alliance
East Orange County Water District Southern California Water Committee
Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Surfrider Foundation of Huntington Beach /
Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce Long Beach Chapter
Greater Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Trammell Crow Company
Groundwater Foundation Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
Groundwater Replenishment System -
Public Information Presentations
AARP Regional Directors Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce
AARP, Garden Grove Fountain Valley Kiwanis Club
AARP, Orange Board Meeting Fullerton Chamber of Commerce
AARP, Orange Membership Meeting Fullerton Community Advancement Group
American Cetacean Society Fullerton Kiwanis
American Legion Post 555 Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce
Anaheim Beautiful Garden Grove Kiwanis
Anaheim Evening Lions Club Greater Anaheim Golden City Kiwanis
Anaheim Evening Lions Club Anaheim Chamber of Commerce
Anaheim Hills/Yorba Linda Kiwanis Greater Garden Grove Kiwanis
Anaheim Public Utilities Board Greater Santa Ana Kiwanis
Anaheim Republican Assembly H. Lewis Lake Senior Center
Anaheim Women's Club/Zonta Club Hall & Foreman Civil Engineers
Apartment Association of Orange County High Twelve/Anaheim
Arrowhead Water Hinckley& Schmitt Co. of Calif.
Association of California Water Agencies Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
AW WA Intemationall Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce
Brea Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach City School District Board of
Brea Senior Center Trustees
Buena Park Lions Club Huntington Beach Kiwanis
Building Industry Association Inside/Outside
Chapman University Investment Real Estate Forum
Children's Hospital of Orange County Iranian American Society of Engineers
City of Anaheim Irvine Chamber of Commerce
City of Cypress Irvine Exchange Club
City of Fountain Valley Irvine Exchange Club Sunrise
City of Fullerton La Habra Kiwanis Club
City of Huntington Beach La Palma Kiwanis
City of Irvine La Palma Lions Club
City of La Palma Laguna Beach Rotary Club
City of Los Alamitos Lions Club,Anaheim Evening Host
City of Newport Beach Lions Club, Anaheim Host
City of Seal Beach Lions Club, Irvine-Tustin Evening
City of Stanton Lions Club, Orange
City of Tustin Long Beach Rotary Club
Classic Property Mangement McKesson Water Products
Costa Mesa Historical Society Merritt Property Management
Costa Mesa Senior Center Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce
Cypress Kiwanis Club Newport Harbor Exchange Club
Cypress School District Board of Trustees North Orange County League of Women
Cypress Sunshine Club Voters
Democrats of North Orange County North Santa Ana Kiwanis
Desk& Derrick Club OC Isaac Walton League
Desk& Derrick Club/Flour Daniel Orange Chamber of Commerce
Disneyland Orange County American Planning Association
District IV Kiwanis Orange County Appraisal Society
East Orange County Water District Board of Orange County Business Council
Directors Orange County Central Lions Club
Groundwater Replenishment System
Public Information Presentations
(Continued)
Orange County Lions Club Soroptimist Women of Yorba Linda/Placentia
Orange County Women's Club South Santa Ana Kiwanis
Orange Empire Sertoma Club Speak Up Newport
Orange Kiwanis Surfrider Foundation, HE/LB Chapter
Orange Suburbia Kiwanis The Walt Disney Company
Orange Unified School District Tustin Area Senior Center
Orchid Club of Orange County Tustin Chamber of Commerce Government
Placentia Chamber of Commerce Affairs
Placentia Methodist Men's Club Tustin Kiwanis
Rainbow Disposal Tustin Lions
Rotary Club of Anaheim University of California Irvine Medical Center
Rotary Club of Anaheim Hills Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce of Orange
Rotary Club of Anaheim Sunrise County
Rotary Club of Brea Villa Park Rotary
Rotary Club of Buena Park Washington Square Neighborhood Assoc.
Rotary Club of Costa Mesa Westminster Chamber of Commerce
Rotary Club of Cypress Westminster Kiwanis
Rotary Club of Fountain Valley Yorba & Featherly Regional Parks
Rotary Club of Fullerton Yorba Linda Rotary Club
Rotary Club of Fullerton South Yosemite Water Company
Rotary Club of Fullerton Sunrise
Rotary Club of Garden Grove
Rotary Club of Garden Grove West
Rotary Club of Huntington Beach
Rotary Club of Huntington Beach Sunrise
Rotary Club of Irvine Spectrum
Rotary Club of Los Alamitos
Rotary Club of Newport Sunrise
Rotary Club of Newport-Irvine
Rotary Club of Orange
Rotary Club of Orange North
Rotary Club of Orange Sunrise
Rotary Club of Placentia
Rotary Club of Santa Ana
Rotary Club of Santa Ana North
Rotary Club of Seal Beach
Rotary Club of Tustin
Rotary Club of Villa Park
Rotary Club of Westminster/Midway City
Santa Ana Kiwanis
Santa Ana Unified School District
Seal Beach Democrat Club
Seal Beach Kiwanis
Sierra Club
Signal Hill High 12 Club
Soroptimist Intemational of Cypress
Soroptimist Intemational of Garden Grove
2� 2 0 THOMAS R. MATHEWS
a; County of Orange
U 1n�1 3W N. FlAWER 5r.
o' r Planning & Development Services Department
tIF04� MA6010 ADDRESS:
P.O. BOX 4
S"NP""NA G 9T034
U01S
Mr. Don McIntyre, General Manager FEB 17 2000
Orange County Sanitation District
PO Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
RE: Designing for Healthy Watersheds Seminars
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
Beginning in March, the Planning & Development Services Department and the Public Facilities
and Resources Department are holding a series of seminars entitled Designing for Healthy
Watersheds.
Focused on examining opportunities in urban development designs to restore and enhance our
watersheds, Dr. Bill Roley of the Permaculture Institute is presenting the programs to four
distinct audiences. The seminar series commenced with a February program for County staff
members and is extending out in March and April for municipal and special district staff, then to
private developers/consultants. The project will conclude in May with a public workshop to
summarize the issues and concepts addressed.
The first pair of seminars will be held at 8:30 to 11:30 on March 16 and 23 here in the Osborne
Building - 300 N. Flower Street in Santa Ana. The second duplicate pair of seminars will be held
at 8:30 to 11:30 on March 30 and April 6 at the Dana Point Harbor Youth & Group Facility. Your
representatives may select either location when they confirm their registration. To register,
leave a message by March 13 with Michael Wellborn at telephone (714) 834-2486, fax at (714)
834-4652, or e-mail at wellbomm@pdsd.co.orange.ca.us. There is no charge for the program.
Dr. Roley's seminars will provide a review of the latest planning and design tools found in
contemporary watershed management (with PowerPoint and slides) and include frequent Q&A
discussions. The "watershed design tools"that will be discussed will also include adaptation and
utilization opportunities by local agencies and developers for local implementation to increase
the health and functioning of our waterways, the aesthetics of our communities and the
enrichment of our natural habitat.
If you have any questions or wish to participate in the seminars, please contact Michael
Wellborn at 834-2486.
Ve tr ou
Tho . Ma Director Vicki L. Wilson, Directory
Plan ing & Deve pment Services Department Public Facilities & Resources Department
cc: Michael M. Ruane
Date: March 15,2000 ,
OMTS Committee Report: Odor Complaints
----------------------------------------------- •---- -----
.FLAN-NO. 1 2000
v$ Jan Feb Mar r f May Jun Jul Augs Oct
11/15 no 12Ill es 116 no
Nov Dec
plant related 12125 no
Total: 0 1 0 0
PLANTN0.2-------------------------------------------- ----- -----
2000 gg Nov Dec Jan i Feb Mar r If Me Jun Jul Aug11 Sep If Oct If
M
1E0
2/3 no 3/4 s
2/10 s 2/13 s2 19 noplant related 2/20 noTotal: 0 2 1
.----n Systems 2000----- -------------------------------- ----- -----
Colleetlo
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct
11/5 12114 1/3 2/8
11/9 12123 113 2/15
11/15 12/28 1/6 2/28
11/15 12/2B 1/10
11/15 1/25
11/15 1/27
11/23
Collection Total 7 Total 4 Total 6 Total 3 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
g:\excel.dlalom\Odor Complaint Log.xis
Corona suit Pagel of 3
Corona goes to court over wastewater
plant
Riverside Press-Enterprise-2/23/00
By Claire Vitucci,staff writer
CORONA-Alleging that taxpayers are the unwitting victims of a
"multimillion- dollar price-fixing scheme," the city of Corona has
filed a lawsuit against the Western Riverside County Regional Waste
Authority over its regional wastewater plant.
The city alleges that the joint powers authority has attempted to force
Corona to use and pay for the sewer treatment plant, though the city
treats its own wastewater with several treatment facilities it operates.
Corona is not a member of the joint powers authority.Lawyers for the
city said Corona applied but was turned down.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in Riverside County Superior Court,names
as defendants the waste authority and its members, including the
Western Municipal Water District, the city of Norco,Home Gardens
Sanitary District and the Jurupa Community Services District.
Western,Home Gardens and Jumpa declined comment, saying they
either hadn't been served with the lawsuit or hadn't reviewed it.
"Norco is just a member of the joint powers authority and operates
under its rules,"Norco City Attorney John Harper said,adding that he
believed Western was the main defendant in the lawsuit. "It(Norco)
doesn't have direct liability under the actions of the authority."
Arthur Kidman, an attorney representing Corona in the lawsuit,called
the regional plant a"$30 million white elephant that should never
have been built."
"The worst part is that Western is now trying to finance this
boondoggle at the expense of Corona residents.Once Western's
record of mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty is exposed,the
public will demand that Corona's rights be restored."
The city contends that it owns but doesn't need the rights to $13.2
million in sewer capacity but has not been allowed by the wastewater
authority to sell or lease the rights.
The lawsuit alleges that Western--the administrator of the joint
powers authority--built an oversized regional wastewater plant
despite warnings by Corona that the city didn't need and didn't want to
use it.
"Now that Western has finally realized that it doesn't have enough
httpJ/members.home.net/khulow/waterweb/2-23—corona—suit.htrn 02/28/2000
Corona suit Page 2 of 3
wastewater discharge volume, and consequently enough revenues,to
operate their new plant,theyre trying to cover their mistake by
developing a punitive rate structure to force Corona taxpayers to pay
for their blunder," Ridman said.
Corona entered into a contract with Western in 1981. For about $13.2
million,the city purchased capacity rights of nearly 3 million gallons
per day from Western to sent its wastewater to the Santa Ana
Regional Interceptor,or SARI, a regional sewer line.
In 1998, after the new plant was built, Western claimed Corona no
longer had the capacity rights to the regional sewer line. Instead,its
rights were held in the new regional plant,the lawsuit states.
In addition, the lawsuit alleges Westem raised Corona's monthly rates
eightfold, from$5,703 to$38,228.
Corona hasn't received any invoices for the latter amount, said Gary
Grant, also an attorney representing Corona in the case.
The 1981 agreement stated that the use of the regional sewer line was
to be temporary until the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority--
the joint powers authority that manages the regional line--or Western
provided alternate facilities for wastewater treatment, the lawsuit
states.
The watershed authority was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
The regional wastewater treatment plant isn't a suitable alternative
because it was built by the Western Riverside County Regional
Wastewater Authority, not Western or the watershed authority, Grant
said.
"The city of Corona has built wastewater facilities,and they're able to
meet their own internal wastewater disposal requirements through the
year 2020 based on population growth" estimates,Grant said. "The
city of Corona doesn't need to discharge either to the SARI line or to
the regional facility or any other things that may be out there."
Instead, the city was holding its rights to the regional sewer line and
had hoped to sell them, Grant said.But because of the dispute over
the 1981 contract,where the rights actually are and the current
payment structure,the city is not able to sell, lawyers said.
The city seeks to have the 1981 contract with Western rescinded and
that the defendants be ordered to pay Corona the amount of its
original investment plus interest.Lawyers for the city estimated
Corona's capacity rights to the regional sewer line to be worth about
$19.7 million today.
http://members.home.net/kharlow/waterweb/2-23—corona—suit.htm 02/28/2000
oil VVA-
ENOUGI
�4
•
�.1
s
i
I
I
i
7rEFI
� JO QUENCH THE BUSINESS THIRST?
hen a major blowout occurred in the other 25 percent of North County's water is
A&P pipeline in December,threat- purchased from the Los Angeles—based
ening the water supply of 700,000 Metropolitan Water District(MWD).The
people in south Orange County,it purchased water comes from the Colorado
was front-page news for a week.The Los River via the aqueduct shown on the cover of
Angeles Tines and The Orange County Register this issue and from the Bay Delta Area in
covered the rupture daily,and most people Northern California.South County doesn't
knew there was a problem.But.as Curt Pringle have any significant underground water.They
pointed out in his most recent column in this are completely dependent on imported water,
magazine,most of them didn't understand the and all of that water flows to them through
details of the problem,didn't know where the the 6-foot diameter concrete pipeline that burst
pipeline was or where the water in it was in December.
coming from or going to.Readers of OC A quick repair response by MWD and
METRO Magazine did know. A week before associated water agencies and conservation
the break,we published a feature article about efforts by the citizen of Laguna Niguel,Rancho
Orange Counry's water infrastructure in which Santa Margarita,San Juan Capistrano and
Senior Writer Steve Thomas explained the other South County communities minimized
differences between North and South County's the impact of the break. The pipeline was
water supplies and pointed out the potential for back in operation seven days after it burst
a problem like the one that occurred. and there was enough stored water to make
Recapping briefly,North County sits atop coffee and take showers in the meantime.But
a natural undergroundsmmge area containing the break highlighted the importance of
more than a million acre feet of water. (An water in people's everyday lives and put a
acre foot is 326,000 gallons of water,enough spot light on the significance of water infra-
to supply a family of five for a year.)Seventy- structure issues.
five percent of the water used from the Spectrum In the second pan of his series,Thomas
area north comes from wells that tap the examines the critical importance of water to
aquifers—water-bearing layers of sand and Orange County businesses,looking at how
gravel—beneath the Santa Ana River.The several major companies use water.
United States,'It just keeps recycling in the
environincnt.It's a perfect system.
"Water is the mein conaument in the dying
process.We couldn't operate Mason,it.We use
17 pounds of water for each pound of carpet we
produce.That adds up TO 700,"gallons a dry.
Because of aspersion,we will be using 900,01)p
gallons a day by March"
Royalty produces 500,000 square yards of
carpet every month using two manufacturing
proussea Sewn-adi iondoUncoutiouous dying
machine handle the bulk of the output Smaller
bablaw and specialty carpets arc dyed in an old-
Cauhiondpiece-dying process.
'Thepiece-dying process uses a tremendous
...at of ormer;'says Jones."You can't just
put a big blotch of dye on the carpet it has to be
woody end deeply WHial,Wow is Ore medicos
we use to transfer the dyestuff to the uget The
carpet is dyed in Urge steel vOM We fill a vat 2
a 1/2 times for each piece dyed.TO keep from
e shocking the carpet,we fill the vat add the dye,
e hag Main half.refill,drain half and so form
until the piece is dyed and rinsed.We also use e
lot of wow in our continuous dying machines,
but not as much proportionately!'
Recogtuzing me value of Orange County'a
'e water resources,Royalty Is a lender in the use
f.:• : of mclaimed water.'We use about 20 parent
reclaimed water now and will be
Orange County businesses are thirsty.Economic athletes competing in the long- using 80peroentwimivsixmonms
disunm maathon of success may rmdaconsmnt Bow ofhfghyualiry wow to keep ; -.+:? mw;'ayslmteswhoisenintema.
moving forward past financial mile markers.Without it they'd collapse like ovedrevM �s,,,, r tiaMBYkreamexpvtonmemNntrial
mnnars in me road.From car washes to cellar manufacturers,from semiconductor aTrl 9 use of ineycled wazre wow.
chip companies to golf courses,Orange County businesses crave water.The most "We are using ubmtg12,000 a
universal solvent,water is essential for all kinds of cleaving operations It is Also month right row by a on,trimmed!
invaluable as a medium in which TO blend ingredients,whether in food proceumg in wawan flash ing me anvimvment
industrial compounds,and as a tansfm odium,carrying substances such as,dye into , atthetausetions:,JOnas my,.'The
Me fine interstices of fabric or fertiliser down to the mats of plats ' reclairnd weer also works better
Every busineen needs water for its employees to drink and wash these hands But F t forwhatwedo"
for many businesses,water is integral to what they do.Concoction companies need .t a According to Jones,me Irvine
water TO dairy down dust and compact fill a they mmape the Southern California yh �J Bunch Wow District ueasswaste-
h0lsmacommodate highways Arm homes ladsrapers and nurseries couldn't opeate _P t a' water to Royalty's exactspecift-
wimoutnt Heels mdrcsomsam dependenton rtnmlust sothattM'vguesM Oan dank w 1( mtions,providing an ideal dying
and beme,but to fill their swimming owls and famusia,to mop Me Boors,wash the J¢ medmin. There Are so army con-
windows,operate aircomidowng systems and keep me grass green . ;.. % a stituentsinwaw—salts and meals
Manufacturing companies such as House fads in Garden Grave,Covenant Systems TP - —andachoveeHeembowtMdye
in Newport Beach and Royalty Carpet Mills in levee require hundreds of thousands a azis.Tbessomenu mtofdyein Ore
or even millions of gallons a day for manufacturing Operations. p sameamountof wawwdlco area
'The issue ofwater ava0abifry,is so(undamentalwsite location that it's classifiedt different color depending on the
on a.'early check off'issue:'says Scot Ofmlie,president of the Orange County =` hardness or softness of me water.
Bai cCamof."Companies maz red Urge amounts of..Made There is a wide variation in the
of availability very early in the process of winnowing down potential locations.If a composition of potable water in
mere isn't enough anew,companies won't come:' : Irvine.The Colorado River water
So where does the vat stream ofwater mat lubricaw Me Orange County economy we gaUtlemmmterh muchhadc
come from?Why doesn't it on out? than de well water we get in me winter.The water that mines down from Me Delm
'There ham'[ban a new drop of wow aeaed U the last billion years;'uys Keith U much higher in Organic compounds.All that variation hum us became we have to
Cmfidge,aasaiate gvtmAl manage fma,MuNcipal WBOYI imittofOringe County djun me transient clemiWswe usemanmilfy to by and keep the dye comer maincrt
(bIWDOC),the agency met distributes import water in the county."When we go "Its beauty of the recycld now is that the district can shoot it in Our specifications.
out to tag,to school kids,I sell mein that the waste may just drank from the fountain We sell Most how many pans per million we want of cahma.iron,potassiumandmegna-
OightbethtsensewaterNapoleonusedmtakeabath.They get a kick out that ¢into sand they give us consistent levels.It is very,very repeatable once you get it nailed
The water Conaxunt uses TO rinse its uttranddem semiconductors,me chips that down and mat helps us tremendously in gain much betty consistency with our colors.
wink the electronic magic of broadband wireless communication.is me more water Our rdye me,is much lower with reclaimed wane That saves us time and money.
me discount drink. "Our ultimate god is to recycle our own wow intemdlY;'Jones says."We have
It's a good thing water doesn't weer out AaOdivg as Robert Beim president of test equipment on site now which uses the latest mimofiluatior technology.It can
the American Society of Civil Engineers,Orange County is essentially a dared, clean up black industrial wrote water in One step,making it pure enough W Link.We
receiving an average of only 14machine,a min each yea,Without the muval citcdetion plan m be recycling 60 to 80 percent of our water imtemally by net Year. That will
of am,ttuovgh over,wnh and sky—a system aided by me ingenuity of generations aeve us tremendously on Me coat of water purchases and even more an the cast of
Southern California wow managers—Orange County baimssu would and up like waste wow dispoal.We have two meters on our in line Bud it is actually more
Me dinosaurs,keAld over with dark corporate bona bleaching in the son. expensive to dispose Of our effluent den it is to buy fresh waw.Recycling wtemzlly
"Water never goes away,"says Chuck Jones,plant manager at Royally Carpet carmoare on rasa as
® 06 METRO I FEBRUARY 10, 2000
LU V UN 1 U
ALISO. y
1
alisoviejocommunity.cont
tl � II'i ,
HE.. OZLD ` t i
Q m �r�c�vNz�sre� � The water Conexant uses to rinse its
dh ultramodern semiconductors, the chips
$135* that work the electronic magic of broadband
1 wireless communication, is the same
water the dinosaurs drank.
will.1.
I IJ will also save us the cost of having to Upgrade
st,comams�atiin on.sa uAs we ccashxpand."
Caeeaent Systems,Ina,thadynala year ge End anaumiocM rise
900 per ant
split th from Rockwell jot industrial
International a year ago and sew its snick riu 900 percent
sine dstab a another major industrial water<oreal to
"A stable supply executive,
director
y water is critical"Large
manufacturing pmcoming
says Richard Bluth,executiveonsW a of ant(whties."t.argeuringwuld in incoming
under quality could s1.7 opmdogatonpointwhererday a tits Ne would a hlocatsN"
Conexant sWius bythe fiinsRanch Water
Dier par aymiudis use Beech location.
Y The water is Applied by the Irvine Ranch Water District and elused for irrigation.
FtLei� rr domestic use Andbuilding the ghneaingandcoutes Mcleannsazwellafrsas they ova
479 d2 a,h"Watz s and in the menu cleaning
nog pmccss s is rep silicon numeersrous
as times.
The
r u mmodi(tibait a1>d through the process line.The cleaning process is designed
numerous times.The
equipment that performs the claming processes is designed to limit the amount of
A�St1 water thu myand onexabe usedmaxhnse Wale ruseopumivuonnmindusny-
thrde priority end Co1lan international
rnaonpal se m several orfmiwater-use optimisation orn projects
ppII1u throughuEMmany H.otermaeorchip anuaturesor(ocuud research organimtion
rnn'"1 III Nminyonesmany other inside a chip manufacturing
Anyone who has been inside achiP mmu(xtudne fmiliaY and seen whim-suind
technicians gliding around in a glass-sealed environment,knows how important[
cleanliness is to the industry.The smallest speck of dust or dirt can modiste with the
functionality of the sensitive devices that make cell phones and computers work.
Comxant employs reverse osmosis(forcing water through a membrane so that all
impuriries are left behind),deimuration and high-tech filters to create the ultra pure
water needed for in advans<d manufacturing processes.
"We can identify changes in water source through ou-site imtrumentation;'says
Bluth."We hive designed avpurification systems 0deal with the real,ofclnrenedsbcs
that come form different sources of incoming water'
mOf METRO I FEBRUARY 10. 2000
I
a , I
Moving one aep;aquip ad of Royalty,Conexant redaims some water internally for
emissionmsiste equipment.
ssich sist Bluder"Tive newmethodsofseduengrpdwuzeruu turesodndusuy
research;'says BluN.'"fhe availability a(a stable,good-quality source of wafer in r r r
Orange County has been a great riot that has helped enable interlining success in `. PayingTop Dollar
manufacturing aver the past 30.yean" -
With 2,100 employers at its Newport Beach site.Careful is a major comparison GOLD DIAMONDS
of the local woromy.The company's dependence on water for continued operation
and its efforts to conserve and reuse water both emphasize the value of this �• '�% ROLEX WATCHES
preciorrabource. 1
A privately held company with SIM million in revenue in 1999,Prudential _ as a 0
-0722
Overall Supply is another local company heavily dependent on water,Founded in _
1932,the company operates 19 commemial laundries in six slates,employing 2000 a a
people.They have 179 employes in Orange County—80 in their Irvine laundry and
99 in main cmpomte headquarters.
"Water is obviously critical to what we,do:says Lee Terry,a manager with
Prudential,"We an,using about 27,000 gallons of waterper day currently in our Irvine
laurrdry.That amounts to about 9.75 million gallons per year."
Prudential recently received an award from me Irvine Reach Water District for
grwtat improvement in water management by a commercial account.
"We reduced our water consumption by 2 million gallons a year by going to a low ' .
Cautious.,...Je ,rR,
Water might acfuallybe cheaper m a tlroughE'"
1 ast)ear,ta Nlnawirder asuwsualydry arH sofartts'mmyseasrn'
Lhasbeeranyme,put m In fact nmelostsuoomeCreep.Court,
has received the lowest amount of rain ever recorded for the period.
And nova scientists at the Jet Propulsion laboatory In Pasadena have
released satellite data which they say predicts a probir,ed period of dry
i weather for Southern C.4cmin is - -
�' The satellittime,s show cooler than normal water temperatures in
`me Eastern Paclf c:and the scientists say decades of parched weather
{I could resuh.So,amwin headed Into a drought? And if so,what will the
consequencesbe?
f -Sum,I'm concerned about the low rainfall levels;says John Senate,
general manager of me Santa Margarita Water Comm,one of the South
County districts most affected by ttre reform pipeline break:'h is already.
having an effect.MWO planned to provide 1.72 million acre feat to
Southern California during the past 12 monthsand they asidegupselling -
1,96 million a sufeet,70 billion gallons morethan they had budgeted.TRu,,
haverf seen Na drop m demand for imported wearNey wale one,during
thewinre.
'It low rainfall continues,it could affect water availability,but I think we
can continue to meet full diamond by purchasing water from other sources
through MWD'ssystem,"Schate says. "m 1998 we bought 1,000 acre foal
of water from Western Water Company,a private company traded cm
NASDAQ that brokers water transfers.That tleal actually power us S50,000
to eause Weslem precedent
premluow t user he deal
pipelines. Theywanred
to establish a precedent and snow that the tleal could be done.Under S T 'S
normal carapaces,Marx pipelines are fail and Nay charyeahighfee to -
wheatwater through theRsystem.Western carit afford 1.doit.one oar The uncommonly perfect dining experience.
basis.During a drought.though,there would on,excess capacity in the
pipelines and it would be much cheaper to move the water. Strange as It Whether it's fresh seafood or USDA Prime Aged Steaks,
may sound,we might actually save money by buying from Western during Scott'scarries on the tradition of San Francisco"Southern
a drought compared to what we nomaly pay MVD.' - - California Style" lunch,dinner and Sunday brunch.
'It has bean very dry so far this year,and it is predicted to be way dry Centrally located in the Orange County theater district
forth.real of the season,"mays Keith Coolidge.assaiato general manager Scott's offers pre-and post-theater dining and private and
'of the Cronies County Municipal Water District."Butthatislustin Saner semi private dining rooms for business meetings or social
Galihrnia.You haveto remember we get waterfrom amuch vntler area gatherings from 15 to 500.
mere has been plants of rare In Central California where the Dena water We are only a short walk to the Performing Arts Center
comes from and theyjust of four feet of Snow in the Simms which makes and offer complimentary valet parking.
it more like a normal year for them in terms of precipratlon — tts1mm�trt�l
"And of course the water we get tram the Colorado River comes from S;o IS
a completely different watershed in the Rocky Mountains. Besides which _ OD
...
they have 50 million acre feet stored of the nverbehind various dams. So r
wa aregCta Ne M1rtwheurg.E+an ermrfal¢lon'h Oval.Carny,vregwkfnY For reservations till:
face drought-like conditions anytime soon.^OCM 7141979-.2400
revue our.
kyG{P TM^
wary-wvn
amen,
rm nuurr -hra[rbmvddaav Nnuu.svwrealbe war"
Davitl Tabb f^+frtorsnso,huni..doxneraeaedarrm -
wo. t.
714.748.2250 .Weill Make That Special Occasion Extra Speciall
.. = �': ' _ amrvamaayarvcteaaaydtonnn.
a
Upgrade Your Web ' �i California `
Business With Web )
Server Co-location K=m=
Get Started
I I Why Dynamic Concepts - - •d - �: :�
r
Dmam c concepts has been
providing ncuvork'ng and
•Increased Control of Your Web Sire software sdwons for over 20
F
Oran Co p
•Direcr Ememet Connection yaars n ge ry
•Multiple IP Addresses Arid we haW me engineer � /' •j
ing experience and talent to
•Optional DNS and Email Service help you oiler a ro loaad -
•Optional Tape Roauon Services arse.voluuan m your tech- �
•More Disk Space-No Shared Sernces Mal requirements
As your Income,same and
•149 Serser M amcrirtg
neeN increase you treed a tram poor car
•l oared in Viso Y<IdOrange County mam, partner who under- irnnN bacdelergrnt,"Ternm)s."Ids ddargcm is mo¢upcnsivc but it allows us
sands now to help you vale to knack three rime cycles off each load.It saves energy and time as well as Water.
•COXu and UUNkTu Connections We get more cloths done faster with less water and electricity."
me technical side of your web TIba company poesida sued Ineares word:claw.for a wide cargo,refvdusuia uichaieg
A co-located web server is the perfect mod business it vision faod since,trades amI manufacturing.Despite the iifform,aeupseions...rearmad,
for hosting a Web sim on fire Incomes the clodus Pmdential buftdersallhaveonethinginconurwnaeywmeimothelaun-
Whencanparedmseningupaserverat Call NTZ1FJow day duty This sequence cri de compvty'sbiggal water pehlcm.
your location,you at :M mouxandx of "H<rt in Its,
we have nevcrhul a problem with supply;'Lee says."But we face
dollars on senerin setup and recurring r I I 1 r ever-utu asng problems with discharge It is a critical issue for us now and
connection du a without additional or visit on the web at, getting mote critical all the mine is the sum impacts stricter mquirtments fortmaing
r%es www,dynamic.netadm wastewater.
Dynamic
yna icaCon headaches. Using she ^laundered garments relrau a lot of solids,m the wash water is heavy in salts
Dan"wl Concepts "Server Co-loation Wrtn yateawn p,you ow- andmeals.Rightnow,wewtwrwanewawrfortypicnlpollu,ants—oilomgrease
Plan"will allow you m inn mission critid mom
c egdi-ed saner pea can and some metals—but mere is ewr cremating pressure to trot for dissolved solids
CPU incursive Inumec server applications se Iugnly-sohyc solutions .ad salts as well.
on your own web server. and Weiacressest vedomunce. "We also create a amain ofsat-heavy waste waterwhen we mftencur wash water,
W the pe feer,somuon for web 'Ito soft water is much better harshening garments but the softening process leaves
With our web server co-laotion plan you stet publishn,drialmos.cua .home solution behind which baser,be disposed of.It isn't feasible fin as to remove
have complete coneml over your serer, mvl serwce,summng all the dissolved solids from our waste water right now,but that is what is cottung
the server software. CGI coMrguracons mMu and mum mom. downeheline:Theanitationdistreason'twantalt-heavywwerbeeauutheywant
and implementation.You provide the web to Whom it she saltier it is the haNer is is Mclean up.
terser and we provide the furniture! "We am comentiy hauling brim to disposal site man we Bbersi0e laundry instead
of funding it out through discharge pipes.We M also eapenmenting with new filtration
We WIII host any type of serer you need ME equipment in Riverside to eliminate that brine haul"
including UNIK NT and Apple Matinmsh. Water use varies in different puts of the county.Them is mote industrial use in
Call us and our co-location experts will .n North County,more residential use,proportionamly,in South County.But South
het a co-loau a Web server according seer car rJ a 9494 8soo County has large commercial users,too.
P y° 8 Hrry: rya®q rm¢„u "We have three golf courses in our area;'says Chuck Roy a supervisor with
to your bummer business strategy. Oadteasels awwdyna. the Moulton Niguel Water District"Mission Viejo Country Club,El Niguel
a...r„•t.rp� ��..W. Golf Course and Allow Niguel Golf Course are some of the biggest water users
at Mf1P0 r rf Bnu— - f000
y. e 51
Arizona' r _'
HQME`
Uf : r r • BMRSGUIDE
I
ResolutionIs Your New Year s I
I I
g .e
Th�Loughts determine what you want.
in the district.It takes a lot of water to keep all that gross green Nctions determine what you get!
'Two thirds of the water they use is reclaimed,the other third is pombla Hey tine
reclaimed m the fairways,pouble on the greens.Our reclaimed weer has a higher soh Has your hard work and effortgiom you allyou desirel
content and the hybrid gran on the greet,is mo delicale to withstand that concentration. Do you want to arhimeyourgoah,and
'The Holiday lrm in Laguna Hills artd the Government Services AdminLstratlon bavn the time to mjoyyour turcess€
(GSA)building in Upon Niguel an,two other large water consumers;'Roy says.
The seven-story GSA building,that opened in 1914 and encompasses more than •Enter the New Millennium with unlimited earring potential
a million square feet of hall,once and storage space,illustrates due complex water . Increase your present earnings...spare-time,part-time,full-lime
usage of large office towcra. Own our own business
We have half-a-down different water meters,"
ete "says Conrad&set,aplannerlesti y
mator at the federal government complex,"We use water for irrigation,building we are looking for entrepreneurial
maintem ice,Instant;and cooling,fur sprasklersystemsand domestic uses-rasuoom.
and drinking water-for the 4000 people who work here.We use about 50,000 gallon. people we can teach, train and develop.
month,all told.
"We amount using reclaimed water for impure in 1998 anal it has saved at a lot -
ofmmay/'says Esser."When we were using feasible our irrigation water bills ranged
between S8,000 and$10.000 a month.With reclaimed they range between S3.5011
and S3,700.
Like the GSA and many local companies,area water agencies arc working it)
eunterve end reuse water,maximizing Orange County's supply of H2O. W E L L N E S S
"Our ultimate goal is to make Orange County self-sufficient in terms of water;' i
says William R.Mills Jr.,general manager of the Orange County Water District CONCEPTS
(OCWD),the Meng Nat oversees distribution and quality of groundwater in Non],
County.'m Hoot end.Mills aM his assaiats devised the Groundwater Replenishment --
Project Approved by the voters last March.the Sd00 million recycling progem will
absorb Qpercent of the county's waste water,transforming it via a three-stage JOIN OUR TEAMI
purification process into water pure enough todrink.The purified water will be piped NURNINI TU/ETNER,IUILIIN/TU/ETNER,SUCCEEUINC TURNER.
upstream along the Santa Ana River to settlement basins in Anaheim where it will
peteolate beck down into the underground reservoir.From there it will be drawn back
up-even Cleaner after Missing down through send end gravel that nap bometin end t i I t
on.v+a•ar —
'-,� ad in will
lprovide 6 billong llontycommshwaierforfa families�- Businesses
nOranMe e, willtyeach year.
ion gallons of fresh water for families and
businesses in Oange sea water will
MigsbelmanFture. water will also contribute to satisfying the martyrs water
needs in the near Future.
• "1lte hold-up with accreditation has been the membrane technology;'he says."It
f - has been coo slow and expensive to be a viable solution.But we are getting Inner mod
1 \ e better membranes cheaper and cheaper as more compwwrs get into the Market.Over
just the last three years we have seen membrane costs cut in half.Over the pest 25
` years,energy costs also iatM with reverse osmosis membrane ratification have been
reduced to 25 pereent of what they once were TWenty five years ago,it took 600
r v i pounds of pressure per square inch to fora water through do eliminating
the silts.Now it takes Jun 150 pounds per square inch Thee greatly reduma theamount
of energy consumed or the process.making it more economically unable.
•Pr m 1 Increasing storage capacity is another way of increasing water supply.Typically,
a in Orange County and Sammons Criforbia as a whole,there is much momwater
•Cubs ��, -.fir } available during the rainy winter months then during the dry summer months,ad much
•Large .e 1c more drat billions of gallons of water go to waste,flowing rapidly out to am without
providing any benefit To ME,community.All the.wster that cad he rrommodeted
•Free i is captured in reservoirs and Underground storage areas but,until recently,capacity
bsFan severely limited. That willchangs Mamb till when the Metropolitan Water
{ District dedicates the new Fast Side Reservoir in Riverside County.With a capacity
•P - of 800,000 acre feet it will hold mare water Bran all the other surface reservoirs in
southern California combined providing a vast storehouse for surplus water.OCM
►t PUSHING PROP 13
NLi - t�sti . r
Proposition 13 is emerging as the holy grail of Congo County water
me$1.976llion Ingiative,w ichh will beency officials and others,canceea d rated up or down March
axcel>tlenal opportunity to address waWoamppiy and water-
quallry Issues statewide,and especially in Soubem California.
"Proposigon 13 is amust forOan9a County.'Men Robert Berm,packend
----------.---.---- of Me AmeflemSociety of Civil Engineers.'A reliable,high-qualhy water
supply S crRical Wthe watty'scomlued examined Pron emy rod bu5ress
Isyourphone , Luak tO for rrrpnnsi.e, grown. Paco.13 previders$276 million in funding apeoRcally for Orange
nliabic cnmmumcatimv+ County water projects.In all likelihood.we will receive a good deal of
.slut.....soch a.: adds innal money in wmpetitive grants and loans.-
system
g "Proposition 13 is an attempt to build a hollstle appeoaeh to California
a°" Teinsn"" water issues, says Ronald B.Unsky,ExecuWe director of Me National
' money vo:mmnvnc:a:.ve"rani Water Research Institute in Fountain Valley.9t breaks may deem previous
decades of Bark&Aid samier sW Orange County water nomes.-
murvauc,a"s On aper- rot basis,Orange County shoud reaceive$224.6 million of
L..b n;.e inns the$1.97 billion command!in Me initiative,"says Kent,Coolidge,associate
general manager of the Munden al Water District of Orange County.'So we
g cv,eu cv,<m•:vv;�.,:;o,,, are definitely recolving cor fair shag Sat BEAR for groundwater roperdshment
or r 1 ant clean-upm thnSama Ana Watershed is$235 million.Four miglen dollars
Is set ackm to study the pollution problems In Huntington Edwin.Another
come".ei Te;roMne $22.5 million will come to Orange County for Flood control projects:"
you money
;siMue;C'n Thewatesb;etl xsQmerantmanaa'kespeeMybrgxatandro OramJe County
because 751ercem of de water tsetl by 2 million county nfvms con;as tram
wells which tap the underground water in the basin.The S235 million will
be used W tleal with groundwater Wllubso problems antl inject mere Stanton
.wg O:r.,rte and reclaimed Water into ale natural Underground reservoir.
In addition to WIMER:guaranteed funding,we are eligible to compete
for another$200 million in funding set aside forme six-coumy Southern
eompnea,;n xrv�re California area.Coolidge adds. "Our share of that money will go for
-- ,mrmua,lrll everything from water conservation antl recycling projects to entering up
San Juan and Aliso Viejo Creaks,
xe cornea' "On top of Mal we wilt massive indirect berefes from projects in Other
parts Of thesentesuch asthe Safe Cranking WatwProgrdm,which leverages
A.
Rod kderal dollars for every,stetedoter.and the Bay Darla Water Management
Program.The Bay Delta Program Includes a total of$250 milion to clean
up and wnect problems in the Della.which have limited the amount of
.« water avallable to Soulhem Cormanda When complete,the project should
result man adddione1125,000 acrefeetof available water.'Shimne Delta
is one of Orange County's three main sources of water,the increase will
Lill a r " hanefa local families and businesses.OCM
mOC METRO I FEBRUARY ter. 2000
Urban Economic Development Threatened by EPA Proposal
NLCLeader Says lowing the witnesses' state- offsets either from other dis- behavior by those comprising sources."
^l events were largely directed to chargers (e.g.. industries) or the economic base afoot notions "On the one bond the agency
whether EPA has authority from nonpoint sources located in cities. requires costly strategies to
TMDL Rule
under the Clean Water Act to the same segment of impaired The whole notion of purches- address overflows; and on the
Must Change regulate nonpoint sources ofpol- water. The assumption is that ing effects, Nielsen explained, other, issues permits to these
laterals,runoff from farms,con- offsets will be purchased-cities puts cities-or at least their tax facilities only if they buy offsets
b Carol Kocheisen fined enamel feeding operations will pay for the pollutant control and/or ratepayers - in the -all without any financial help
r and timber activities that pol- activities of others, and accept untenable position of having to tram the government mandating
lute the nations waterways. responsibility for their effective- finance the pollutant control
ro q
l the re uirsments,"he said.
A pngasal by the Eirvirom In response, EPA Assistant ness - rather than installing activities of private, for-profit
Nielsen recommended that
mental Protection Agency(EPA) Administrator for Water Charles prohibitively expensive equip. entities, many of which will be
could jeopardize urbanco economic Fox indicated that while there men) at municipal facilities la located outside the municipal Congress should tell EPA to
development unless action is was certainly,about the agency's reduce their own pollutant leads. boundaries. If EPA lacks revise and re-propose the TMDL
taken to change the current Ian- authority to require permits Offsets and polluant trading authority, he continued, it is regulations to reflect more aceu-
guage related b7b1a1 Maximum from large confined animal feed- raise a whole series of questions here. Nowhere does the law rawly reel world circumelances
Daily Use! (TMDL) rules, ing operations (CAFOs), nmoff for cities,the NIA witness said. authorize the agency to desig. and to allow further public cone.
according W city advocates. from farms - and to a lesser How do we identify appropriate new cities"as surrogate author- counts on what is now a very
Testifying on NLC's behalf, extent, from forestry operations polluters and their pollutants? ities to ensure attainment of flawed proposal.
Eau Claire,Wis. Council Presi- - are outside the parameters of is there any confluence between water quality objectives from At o minimum, offsets arc
dent William Nielsen told the the law. municipal discharges and pollu. sources ofpollutants not regulnl- inappropriately applied to
)louse Water Resources Subcom- Of concem to the nation's Cants in runoff from farms, ad by the law." municipalities and should - at
mittee last week, The EPA's cities, Nielsen told the commit- ranches, forests, and mines? "umber," the Council Presi- Mat-be discretionary for cities.
proposed TMDLrules, if not tee,is'who will bear the prawn- Even EPA Assistant Adminis- dent explained, "city officials Furthermore,he said, apply-
amended, will severely limit dersnt responsibility for attain- trator Fox admitted, 'Without believe the proposed TMD1, ing TMDIa to municipal
growth and economic develop- ment ofwater quality standards: adequate, accurate information, rates will nullify virtually every stormwaler discharges merely
meat in urban arena, obstruct those over whom there is stale- trading won't work." agreement reached by three fed- compoynls the problems of a
compliance with urban wet Cory control because they fall 'T'he imposition of, what in era] advisory committees' to program that already has too
weather mandates, shift the within the purview ofthe law,or effect is a'zero discharge'policy," address urban wet weather many unrealistic requirements.
financial burden for pollutant those whose contributions cause Nielsen told the committee, problems." The Council Presi- Them municipal storwater pro-
reductions to tonal tox and continued n cr unattainenl of "sends a'no growth'message to dent pointed out that-about the grimy both Phase I and Phase
ratepayers, and generate end- water quality standards?" every city bordering an impaired time the Phase 11 cities will mm. If, should be exempt from
leas litigation." Nielsen, a member of NLC's waterbody." "Such a policy,"he plete their stmer water program TMDLs for the foreseeable
In the opening salvo on the EENR Steering Committee,else continued, "will preclude any planning and begun implem an-
proposed TMDL regulations-on expressed serious reservations growth or major redevelopment talon,TMDLac will be sunerm, future.
which EPA received over 30,000 about the concept of pollutant in already developed areas and posed,creating a whole new set .Over the fast 12 yeas NLC
comments - members of the trading-a hallmark of the EPA force growth and expansion to ofcriteria.' members participated in the
Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. proposal, unpolluted areas." With respect to combined and
Sherwood Reehlert (R-N.Y.1, For a municipal facility (a While industrial dischargers sanitary sower overflow romedi. Combined Sewer Overflow
seemed mostly concerned about publicly awned treatment may find it more cast effective to state requirement%,Nielsen told (Decatur, lit. Councifinember
the potential impact on agricul- works)to increase discharges by move their operations to a more the committee that-cities cannot Same John);Smrmmater Phase
tune and forestry operations. 20 percent or mope - to weram- pristine waterbody rather than comply with federal directives to 11 (Port Lauderdale Mayor Jim
With the exception of the chair module growth or to comply with seek oftols, cities cannot role- redirect excess wet weather Naugle); and Sanitary Server
man and Rep.William Pascrcll regulations addressing pollu. sale,he said. "What is more,"he flows to treatment facilities Overflow (Butte/Silver Bow,
(D-N.J.) (sec related story on tants from combined or sanitary continued hve are dismayed that while simulteramusly being pre- Mont. Chief Executive Jack
H.R. 3570, the Urban Wet sower overflows-it would have a federal agency would write eluded from doing an without Lynch) Fedeml Advisory Com-
Weather bill),the questions tot- to obtain one-to-one-and-a half regulations encouraging' such obtaining offsets from other miffeea
two funding streams for munici-
pal et$1weather programand
$1.5 Wet W� MOW Progwallms Need b
$1 billion and $1.6 billion
tion of numerical effluent limits policy, including granting cities citizen suits for certain un avoid- lively,for fiscal gran and cities rThese
by card w1eim on municipal stormwater dis- up to 15 years to complete mm- able overflows.As with the CSO funds in grants m de a These
charges and;authorize a:three- Pgsncewith the requirements of policy, the measure would Pro- funda.would be made available
"Nowhere is there-a greater - year$3 billion grant Program to the polity. vide:16:years for cities.to com- for.. plan. ..,
-. need to strengthen the Clean help ..finance municipal wet - plate compliance with any new sixtti tion of f design,and can-
Water Act than in the area of weather initiatives. . - rules cept,t ra of facilities to iflows
. .$OOII�'SeYlef OYeIHeWS�SSOsI horn separate or metro] flow,
,Water
wet weather programs," - from separate storm sewer sy,-
. said Reps. .Steven IATourette CoWiied SeWlf OW&W3 IM) The measure wouldalso set Stommyaler tams or combined and/or sani-
(R-Ohio)end BiRPascrell,Jr.(D- basic parameters for any federal tary sewers;
NJ) as.they introduced:-H.R. EPNs current policy with: :requirements for.dealing.with H.R: $570 clarifies Congrav- •.planning and implementa-
3570, the Urban Wet Weather respect to combined sewer over- sanitary sewer overflows. In the sional intent with respect to.. .lion of wet weather control mea- _
Priorities Act of 20OOr in.the flow.was developed in conjunc, absence of a national policy on municipal--stormwater die surer and management pme-
House of Representatives, The lion with affected municipalities SSOs, cities confront wide- charges by re-emphasizing that tines;and,
P-Posal,. designed to address and other stakeholders and pm- spread inconsistency between cites are;inquired to use Best • development and imple-
critical urban wet weather mulgatedinl994. Thatpolicyis and among regioms on SSO Management Practices CBMPs) mentationi of urban watershed
issues—combined and.euitery now tieing threatened:by inam. requirement& to the Maximum Extent Pmcti- management lane
sewer overflows and municipal sisteut interpretations and . While EPA convened a fedeIr cable (MEP) and not to meet P e
atormwator programs,was-b-. �. • ye million over the aeon
cited a coalition of local m¢easing reluctance m apply al advisory,committee and is numerical:discharge standards. three years for implementation
by gDv- its Provisions by federal and working on national rules, the The measure also defines MEP of wet weather.demonstration
eminent organizations;'indud- state iegalstore Cities have existing framework of the Clean to exclude construction of faa1i- .
ing NLC "Protects
The a m= would codify 'already. spent significant Water severelyto Haifa the ties W treat urban stormwater City officials should secure
EP& current combined sewer re.ources to implement CSO workable
ability to develop a runoff _ commitments from their mem-
P%lei 1M1P1*'"t with the pot- workable policy. H.R. 3670 bars of Congress to support,co-
overflow (CSO) policy, require icy and now need the force of would set parameters within Fun&g sponsor, and enact H.R. 3570.
tent(with the CSO polity) law to protect their investments. which the agency would develop
uirements for sanitary sewer Action o the Senate is entici-
r�l prof tion would provide that appropriate regulations,s finin The Urban Wet Weather Pri- paled shortly s
overflows,. prohibit the.impoxi- ..protection by codifying the 1994- ring protections for cities from ,it,. Act of 2000 authorizes
� 4
I06Y,Awunr+y14,2000 TWta¢R-PrAY *
TreatimpM
plants: :
re
faked. , .
a
1 soar..'
UOY wn� Fe& send plea agreement,
g bankruptcy. uAdar Tham.1,48
- _ plea he$4.4 million
lion co a only after
to pay 9.4 . pay the$4.4 m0lion fine only after
liy� a0 tnsditors are paid itilmll,
with g
By mere P.otrls ... • - The fede;4 ggvea®ent's eii.
/-��� 1' will rank ahead iquly of those.:ot
,r V some of Johmsona,exaFu6iveq,tn-
A private uh"Idy companylkat nm eluding Glenn.Kelly Johnson,VY o
more than 200 small sewage treat SEWAGE,frmn Gl .. ..._ sill fares criminal dwgm Rest-
ment plants inUndsiana and five der- ........................ .................•_..... .. . tution,to the homeowners
willbe
er states admitted'Thursday it viehl. and than assured Loui®etia regula- considered a p claim..
ed federal environmental laws and torsthe company had the expertise paid before general unsen
agreed to pay a erimina fine of$U to manage and maintain the sewer million,
the Plea agreement¢ ¢7.
million, the largest such penalty ever systems in.southern Louisiana, The companies,based m`Ms-
inposedmLouWana .. . US.Justice Department officials mpp4 pleaded guilty before"
euc said District Judge Morey Sear hrtldw
eabeldiarie pleaded guilty to conepa- In a November 1998 civil set Urlesna. r :c..••
ing to violate the Clean Water Ant demeng the companies agreed to 'These companies knOOAVy
and also agreed to pay $100,090 to compty wifh'the Clean Water Act,' failed to piovide,bewage Qi nt
homeowners affneW by the subdue, but later inspections of 78 facilities services to th62atizena` 1tllree
dard treatment plants.The comps- found that none were meeting fed- communities, j0pardil1bg.Ih
else,which operated plants in Tam eral-requirsments, officials said health and safety(("'aerd Lola J.
daux and Houma,admitted they an- The companies were discharging Schiffer, ae®sten0attorney general
riched themselves and their exeea- large quantities of potentially for Environment AM Natural"$e-
tives at customers'experpe and faked harmful pollutants m local waters, sources at the JuetkE DepsrtM0t,
lab reports to regulators to hide the streams and bayous and introdue- 'rheynowpaytheprice."
plants'substandard operations ing raw sewage and sewage sludge Randy,A" the EPA ageat-in
From 1991 to 19M Johnson Proper- into the environment charge o� the agencya crirniioel
ties bought 4elitiee In March, a federal .judge ap- investigation dtvieion in Ralgn
.. pointed a receiver to operate the Rouge, ssA'ihe fine was,the FA*
.................... companies when they filed for signfi®ntlebied n a�.na. --
- Cos anncics LimcB
Orange County's 13 watershed area pour into five major waterways
WASHINGand many smaller ones that drain into the Pacific. Bacteria levels are
OUT TO S f I# often high where these waterways,fouled by urban runoff and sewage
spills,empty into the ocean.
The 29-mile San Gabriel Rher Bees ham the San Gabriel The Santa Ana Rher begins more Van 100 miles awry in
Mountains to the Pack between Ong Beach and Seal the San Bem.e ino Mountains.V receives n off from cities
Beach.The firer drains about 635 square sales of Los and dairies before it empties into the Pacific in Buabnglon
Angeles,Orange and San Bernardino conies,hone to Beach.Its watershed includes more than 2,650 square miles
about 2.5 million people. in San Beenam era.Rrmnode and Orange counties,
-- home to more than 4.5 million people.
r. 1.' BANA AM PIYEIL•.
orru
ift
� ala
3
did�-- � ,r' • � - (: ---- ...
� rAa• �4q� - Moss),• V6q:
• . l
Souee PAUL CARSO Los Awl-i•mes
Dee.or Ne.YpM1i.tm Mytl>W LnGs?+tl Prrtn WmeNWa faW.Sxu Ma Were J�N Fare[I W1Mn0
LA Times Page 1 of 5
SIT IN THE
Gd l
—l1Lta•: Home I Discussions I Print Edition I Archives I Site Map I Home Delivery I Advertise I Help
News Business Sports hap:// .latimes.wmledibonslorangelt ays.topsWry.him
Politics Travel Commentary
Entertainment Classifieds Shopping
muac.mpyies.an. loos homes Back to StO.r�(
N,reslaurants rare,allows
Tuesday, March 7, 2000
A Clear Water Revival
m In an effort to fight ocean pollution, officials are focusing on the problem
at the sources of contamination—inland.
By SEEMAMEHTA,Times Staff Writer
With beach closures and high bacteria counts threatening Orange County's
coastal appeal, local officials and activists are increasingly looking inland for
solutions, taking a holistic approach to the problem of ocean pollution.
Solutions range from rebuilding antiquated storm water systems to public
education to creative planning. All target the myriad sources of contamination on
land that have caused an increasing number of beach closures.
"The ocean starts at your doorstep--regardless of where you live," said county
Supervisor Tom Wilson.
Waste, chemicals, fertilizer and other pollutants are carried from every home
in Orange County and far beyond to stone drains, channels, creeks or rivers that
empty into the Pacific Ocean.
Five major waterways and several smaller ones that end in Orange County
carry runoff from thousands of square miles and millions of people. A steady
flow of urban runoff, sewage and other pollutants into such waterways is
threatening the county's picturesque beaches and crystal waters.
Heavy rainfall,such as Sunday's downpour, can flush pollutants and sediment
downstream with such force that brown plumes reaching miles out to sea are
created. Recent storms have elevated bacteria counts at the mouths of the Santa
Ana and San Gabriel rivers and San Juan and San Diego creeks, according to the
county health officials.
Past solutions have revolved around what environmentalists call Band-Aid
fixes, such as diverting storm-drain flows to sewer systems during the summer.
While such temporary solutions have their place, activists and officials say the
only true answer to save the coast is a fundamental societal shift--from
persuading homeowners to stop over-watering their lawns to configuring new
developments so that runoff is filtered and directed into ponds,rather than sent
untreated into the ocean.
"We're conditioned as a society to look for quick answers," said Christopher J.
Evans, executive director of the Surfrider Foundation, based in San Clemente.
hftp://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/pNnt.cgi 03/07/2000
LA Times Page 2 of 5
r
But the solution to urban mnoff"isn't fast.It isn't easy.It's about changing our
thinking about how we steward the ocean and the land,"he said.
Multifaceted Approach
Bacteria levels are already dangerously high where most waterways hit the
beach,resulting in ocean water being off-limits for days,weeks or sometimes
months at a time. Many creek mouths have total colifonn levels that exceed
health standards as much as 95%of the time.
To deal with this growing problem,officials are touting a multifaceted
watershed management approach that includes increasing public education,
changing how runoff is handled in built-out areas,improving development design
concepts,enacting higher standards and strictly enforcing pollution laws.
This movement comes at a pivotal time.
In the coming decades,as the population booms and the dwindling
undeveloped land is paved over,runoff is expected to become an increasing
environmental,economic and health problem.The county's population is
expected to grow from 2.8 million to 3.3 million by 2020,according to the Center
for Demographic Research at Cal State Fullerton.
All these people will be accompanied by housing,streets and other
infrastructure.Natural soils and vegetation that now filter runoff,absorb it and
slow its travel will be paved over. Concrete,asphalt and other hard surfaces act as
a freeway for water to quickly reach the ocean. Along the way,every particle of
copper shed by car brakes,every bit of animal waste left on sidewalks and every
drop of pesticide sprayed in backyard gardens is picked up.
Adding to this brew are the regular unauthorized discharges into the county's
creeks.In 1999,a total of 276 spills sent 5.7 million gallons of raw or partially
treated sewage into area waterways.
By the time many creeks and rivers reach the ocean,they are a stew of sewage,
heavy metals,poisons,animal waste and other pollutants.
Activists such as William H.Roley Jr.,director of the Laguna Beach-based
PermaCulture Institute of Southern California, say now is the time to ensure that
past mistakes are not repeated.
Development ought to be planned"as if nature mattered," he said. "It takes a
conscious effort. We need to reduce impervious surfaces and invite nature back
into our developments."
Roley has taught at Cal Poly Pomona and at universities in Brazil.He is
among the experts speaking at a series of county-sponsored workshops for local
officials on ways to minimize runoff.A public workshop will be conducted in
May,said Michael Wellborn,a county senior planner.
Roley emphasizes that simple design changes,such as narrowing roads,
shortening driveways,creating pocket parks and building males instead of
gutters,can allow an area to naturally treat its urban runoff.
Storm water needs to be viewed as an asset rather than a liability,he said.
Instead of directing water away from developments as quickly as possible, it can
be harnessed and reused.
When water is recycled within a development,"you can produce a flower, a
scent,a habitat area,an edible product, a salable product,a usable product," he
said,citing a handful of exampled,including a housing development in Davis that
uses storm water to irrigate an orchard.
http://www,latimes.comlcgi-bin/pdnt.cgi 03/07/2000
LA Times Page 3 of 5
Some of Roley's examples are unique. One solution designed by architect
Hundert Wasser that has been tried in Austria involves planting trees on every
other floor of a multistory building. The trees,with branches emerging from
windows,are fed by storm drain runoff from the roof. Eventually, activists
envision nutrient-rich compost from the tenant's toilets on the floor above
nourishing the trees.
Local officials are skeptical that so radical a solution is practical here.
However,they accept the underlying logic of dealing with runoff locally--rather
than allowing it to flow unfettered to major bodies of water--as the key to
ensuring future developments do not exacerbate pollution problems.
Wetlands Planned
State and county officials praised the Marblehead,Talega, Ladera Ranch and
Newport Coast developments for including runoff control measures.
At the 4,000-acre Ladera Ranch,developer Rancho Mission Viejo Co. put in
two large wetlands--totaling about 18 acres--that will pond, detain and filter
runoff, said Vice President Richard Broming. Additionally, a nearly 3-mile
wetland"riverine"that leads runoff to one of the ponds runs through the
community. This system will treat dry runoff and the first-flush storm flows from
the 8,100-home development in South County,he said.
Although officials are pleased by these voluntary efforts,regional water board
members are considering stricter requirements for developers similar to measures
in Los Angeles County. In January, the Los Angeles regional water board
required large new developments to capture or treat runoff from the first three-
quarters of an inch of rainfall.
Wayne Baglin, chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control
Board, said his agency has scheduled a public workshop Wednesday in Temecula
to consider a similar requirement.
The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,which has jurisdiction
over the remainder of Orange County, is studying whether such limits are
necessary in its region,said Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer.
A larger problem is retrofitting existing development. "It takes a lot of
money," Wellborn said.
There are steps that cities and the county can take, such as installing catch
basins in storm drains and increasing street sweeping. Prompted by last summer's
two-month Huntington Beach shoreline closure,Orange County and five coastal
cities that depend heavily on tourism dollars recently sought$1.2 million from
various sources to pay for as many as 30 storm drain and pump station diversions
from Huntington Beach to San Clemente.
Elsewhere other concepts are being introduced. For example,on the East
Coast, some parking lot operators have replaced medians with gravel and mulch
filters.
"One thing is not going to fix all these problems," Wellborn said. "We need to
come up with a range of designs and see what is going to fit for what
communities."
Although costly,Berchtold said,retrofitting can head off enforcement actions
and fines from regional water boards.
In the past,public education was heralded as the cure for urban runoff.
Although no longer seen as a magic bullet to eliminate coastal pollution,
http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 03/07/2000
LA Times Page 4 of 5
publicity campaigns remain an important component.
♦ t +
Washing Out to Sea
Orange County's 13 watershet areas(indicated by colored areas)pour into five
major waterways and many smaller ones that drain into the Pacific Ocean.
Bacteria levels are often high where these waterways,fouled by urban runoff and
sewage spills,empty int the ocean.
San Gabriel River
The 29-mile San Gabriel River flows from the San Gabriel Mountains to the
Pacific Ocean between Long Beach and Seal Beach. The river drains about 635
square miles of Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino counties home to about
2.5 million people.
The Santa Ana River:
The San Ana River begins more than 100 miles away in the San Bernardino
Mountains. It receives runoff from cities and dairies before it empties into the
Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. Its watershed includes more than 2,650
square miles in San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties and more than
4.5 million people.
Source: Orange County Health Care Agency
WASTE DISCHARGES
These discharges are primarily spills of raw sewage and reclaimed water,but
also include a wide variety of substances, including foam,grease and squid juice.
1999 WASTE DISCHARGE CAUSES:
14 Miscellaneous
14 Pump station failure
38 Pipeline break
210 Pipeline blockage
BEACH CLOSURES:
These numbers represent several multiple-day closures at beaches
throughout Orange County.
Number of O.C. beach closure days.
1999 BEACH CLOSURE CAUSES
1 Treatment plant
2 Pipeline breaks
3 Miscellaneous
5 Pump station failure
11 Pipeline blockage
What's in the Water
Polluted ocean water can contain pathogens—disease-causing bacteria,viruses
and protozoa.Pathogens that may be found in ocean waters contaminated with
sewage or runoff include:
Pathogenic Agent: Disease
http://www.latimes.conVegi-bin/pdnt.ogi 03/07/2000
LA Times Page 5 of 5
BACTERIA
E. coli: Gastroenteritis
Salmonella typhi: Typhoid fever
Other salmonella species: Various enteric fevers(often called paratyphoid),
gastmenteritis, septicemia(generalized infections--organisms,multiply in the
bloodstream)
Shigella dysenteriae and other species: Bacterial dysentery
Vibrio cholera: Cholera
* r •
PROTOZOA
(Intestinal Parasites)
Cryptosporidium: Diarrhea-Cryptosporidiosis
Giardia lamblia: Diarrhea- Giardiasis
s + •
VIRUSES
Rotavirus: Diarrhea-Gastroenteritis
Norwalkvirus: Gastroenteritis
Coxsackievirus(some strains): Various,including severe respiratory disease,
fevers,rashes,paralysis, aseptic meningitis myocarditis
Adenovims: Respiratory and gastrointestinal infections
Echovirus: Various,similar to coxsackievirus, (evidence is not definite except
in experimental animals)
Poliovirus:Poliomyelitis
Hepatitis A: Infectious hepatitis(liver malfunction),also may affect kidneys
and spleen
Source: Orange County Health Care Agency
� g
hftp://www.latimes.com/ogi-bin/pdnt.cgi 03/07/2000
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 22, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
03/22/00
Page 2
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
February 23, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/00 02/29/00
Totals $5,249,497.97 $8,616,540.73
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent
Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
a. Receive and file complaint for injunctive relief and damages, Norman
Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 000000844, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the
interests of the District.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
03/22/00
Page 3
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 22, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on February 23, 2000 to be filed.
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re March 1, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 1, 2000 to be filed.
C. Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the biosolids management contracts
with Pima Gro, Bio Gro, Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one
account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed
necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations and contractor
performance.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
March 2, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
March 2, 2000 to be filed.
C. 1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company,
authorizing an addition of$19,957, increasing the total contract amount to
$211,561; 2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545,
decreasing the total contract amount to a total contract amount of$204,016;
and; 3)Accept RA 6 W Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement,
Contract No. 7-28, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac
Construction Company.
d. Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a
Long-Term Sewer Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73.2.
e. 1) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; 2) Establish a budget for
the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5.50, for a total
budget of$4,124,000; 3) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14r"
Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, for a total budget of$2,210,000; 4)
Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A"Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-52,for a total budget of$2,248,000; 5)Approve a budget
amendment of$12,061,000 for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation
to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for a total budget of$14,284,200;
03/22/00
Page 4
and 6) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. to provide
engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos.
5-49. 5-50, 5-51, and 5-52 for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801.
f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to
prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the
rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract
No. 7-21, for a total amount not to exceed $175,261.
g. Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to
prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for Warner
Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed
$224.800.
h. Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to
provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach
A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and
Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for a total
amount not to exceed $811,958.
I. Direct staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job
No. J-77, to replace the Foster Pump Station.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re March 8, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 8, 2000 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2D00.
d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
e. Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland &
Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999-00 for an
amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years 2000-01
and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03
and 2003-04 upon Board approval.
15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re February 24, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 24, 2000 to be filed
03/22/00
Page 5
C. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson
Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,
adding a public health element to the existing public information program for an
additional amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed
$275,895, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water
District having equal shares in the additional amount of$35,500.
16. 1) Approve the plans and specifications for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Receive
and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation; and 4)Award a contract to JW Contracting Corporation for Solids
Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to
exceed $10,428,440.
17. Presentation on Consolidation of Revenue Area Financial Plans and Rates, except
Revenue Areas 7 and 14 (information only).
18.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
,agenda`asa regular meeting of the Board the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations; pending or
potential litigation,or personnel'matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections'
54956.8. 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
'Reports relating to (a)purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
..potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee. '-
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
-session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
=takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development
Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)).
2. Confer with General Counsel re Michael Rozengurt v. Orange County
Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No.
808544, and Worker's Compensation Appeals Board Case No. AHM
0062970 (Government Code Section 54956.9).
3. Confer with General Counsel re Cross-Complaint, County of Kern v.
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, at al., Tulare
County Superior Court Case No. CV-PT-00-189564 (Government Code
Section 54956.9).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
03/22/00
Page 6
19, Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
21. Adjournment
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of
business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
H:\wp a�genda\ mrd Agendas\2'pp Board AgendasMYt00.do
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 23, 2000
N Aairgrr
by N EN`�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/23/00
i Page 2
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on February 23, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan,Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall
A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Michael L. Maertzweiler
James M. Ferryman X Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer Margie L. Rice
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob
Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Ed Torres; Jim Mullins; Mark Boyd;
Catheirine Biele; Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Phil Stone; David L. Hamilton; Terry
Lane; Don Hughes; Dan Cassidy
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/23/00
Page 3 t
MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the
following re appointment of active and attemate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Anencv Active Director Alternate Director
Garden Grove Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater•
Placentia Norman Z Eckenrode Michael L. Maertzweiler•
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Debay invited Director Jim Ferryman to attend the March Steering Committee meeting
and Director Russ Patterson for the April Steering Committee meeting. It was also announced
that Item 16 listed on the agenda would be considered immediately following the consent
calendar.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there was a spill Monday afternoon in the Buena
Park/La Mirada area when a sewer line surcharged. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services,
said that the Regional Board has been notified and a written report is due by Friday. It is estimated
that about 10,000 gallons may have flowed into the storm drain, which ultimately emptied into the
ocean via the San Gabriel River. The OC Health Care Agency has closed the beach in the area of
the mouth of the river, citing a sewage spill.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel reported that due to a clerical error, Agenda Item 17(a)(2) should reference
IUOE Local 501 rather than Orange County Employees Association.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held January 26, 2000, be deemed
approved, as corrected.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/00 01/31/00
Totals $4,087,426.77 $8,798,129.00
CONSENT CALENDAR
9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the
Agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District extending the period
of the Demonstration of Natural Gas Engines in Heavy Duty Trucks Project from
3/31/00 to 11/1/00 at no additional cost to the District.
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/23/00
Page 4
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the February 23, 2000 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
January 26, 2000 to be filed.
12. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A
verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee, re the February 3, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions
taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes
for the meeting held February 3, 2000 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve Professional Services
Agreement with CH2M Hill for Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation
and Improvement, Job No.J-71-4, for a total amount not to exceed$485,000;
and (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into agreements with chemical
suppliers for chemicals and related services, for an amount not to exceed
$183,000, to support demonstration testing of altemative technology for suede
control in the tiunkline (Specification No. C-146).
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Carollo Engineers for professional engineering services,
including a preliminary engineering report for a new Headworks at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-66,for an amount not to exceed $375,000.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve a purchase order contract
to Southern Contracling Company for Purchase of 48D-Volt Switchgear
Equipment, Spermcation No. E-276,for a total amount of$304,213.
I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment
of$51,000 for Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, for a total budget of
$1,648,960; and (2)Accept Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approving the
Final Closeout Agreement with KPRS Construction Services,.Inc.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to
Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23,with Matthew
and Stewart Company, Inc. authorizing an addition of$7,570, increasing the total
contract amount to$137,366; (2) Ratify Change Order No.2 to Contract
No. 11.23, authorizing a deduction of$19,012.80, for a revised total contract
amount of$118,353.20; and (3)Accept Huntington Beach Sewer and
Abandonment, Contract No.11-23, as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Matthew
and Stewart Company, Inc.
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/23/00
Page 5
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 9 to
Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 3, Contract
No. 3-38-3, and City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn
Lane at Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97, with
Mladen Buntich Construction Company, authorizing a deduction of$54,000 for
Liquidated Damages, decreasing the total contract amount to $5,215,546, and
adding 20 calendar days time extension for inclement weather, (2) Ratify Change
Order No. 10 for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for an addition of
$39,046.80, increasing the total contract amount to$5,254,592.80; and (3)
Accept Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract
No. 3-38-3, and City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn
Lane at Imperial HighwayAdaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion.
i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to
Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup
Civil, Inc., authorizing an addition of$162,344, and 338 calendar days,
increasing the total contract amount to$2,819,318; (2)Approve a budget
amendment of$185,199 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of
$4,444,886; and (3)Accept Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and
approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Replacement of Santa Ana
River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 240, with NCCI
Enterprises, Inc., as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion
and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve a budget increase of
$270,274 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job
No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,081,274; and (2) Ratify
Change Order No. 3 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade,
Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of$20,274 and
339 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $716,832.
I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44.4
(Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$218,540,
and a time extension of 120 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount
to $906,940.
13. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Mark Leyes, Vice Chair of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the February 9, 2000
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 9, 2000 to be fled.
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/23/00
Page 6
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of January 2000.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year
Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 1999.
14. Item deleted.
15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for
Grit Removal System, Job No. J-52; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specfications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommerdation; and (4)Award
construction contract to Norman A. Olsson Construction Company for Grit Removal
System, Job No. J-52, for an amount not to exceed $715,900.
16. David Hamilton, representative from IUOE Loral 501, addressed the Directors regarding
the grievance filed by District employees Mark Boyd and Darlene Wilkerson. He clarified
that Local 501 is representing the employees in this grievance. Mark Boyd also
addressed the Board regarding the issues that prompted the filing of the grievance. His
concern was management demanding training on pay-for-performance issues while their
group was conducting meet and confer sessions.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Affirm the decision of the General
Manager at Step 4 of the grievance procedure by finding no violation of the existing
Memorandum of Understanding provisions, and ordering no further action. Management
was directed to increase sensitivity to training issues while employees are in the meet
and confer process.
Director Don Bankhead opposed.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
54956.9 and 54957.6: The Board convened in closed session at 8:09 p.m., pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session
held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government
Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were
taken re Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1) and (2).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:31 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
Secretary of Board of D))' tors of
Orange Coun anitation bi trict
H\wp.0a�gendaUBoard Min,Aea 2000 Board Ml omN022300Aoo
Claims Paid From 1/1100 to Ill 6100 m
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descriptlon
Accounts Payable-Wit enb
24W Cerullo Engineers & 51,141.02 Engineering Services-P2-BO&J-34-1
24546 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 21.100.0 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K
24547 Ccmpusdzed Facility Integration 178,911.64 Engineering Service J-25-1
24648 E.I.Cu Pont De Nemoum and Company 43,681.00 Painting Malnt.Services MO 4-22-98
24549 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 26.415.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99
24550 Projects Partners 43.605.47 Temporary Employment Services
24551 ScuNem California Edson 34,686.43 Power
24552 Tran Consulting Engineers 38238.00 Consulting Services 5416
2450 Tide Ranct/Mogan Fanca 63,240.25 Residues Removal MO 3.29.95
245M Bernard Carlstnldlpn Company,Inc. 501 Construction 3.35R&111R
24555 Flemin9 Engineering,Inc. 351,425.08 Construction 3.38-1
24556 Mathew And Shrived Co.,Inc. 56,660.41 Construction 11-23
24557 Svenirup CMl.Inc. 41.719.00 Construction 7-7-1
24558 Union Bank of Celpomla 39,047.23 Construction 3-38-1
24569 Union Bank of CalKomis 58.533.80 Cambecion 3.35
245W ABEL Pumps Carp 208.75 Freight
24MI Great American Printing Co. 901.35 Office Supplies
24502 Airborne Express 9.50 Air Freight
24583 Ails-Robbins,Inc. 152.6a Instrument Supplies
24564 Alemativa Dispute Resolution Cadge Group 411,01 Human Resources Service
24585 American Management Association International 1,425.00 Registration
245W Pollan Industries 3,30523 Instrument Supplies
2407 American Training Resources,Inc. 633.30 Training Materiels
24668 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
24569 Applauds Employment Service 2,426.06 Temporary Employment Services
'b 24570 Applied Industrial Technology 1,394.52 Electrical Pads&Supplies
24571 Aquatic Testing Labaratorss 6,400.00 Toxldly Testing
24572 Aerates&Trophies By Sea 30.17 Plaques
24573 A;u r Environmental 426.93 Lab Supplies
24574 APEX Communications 3,900.00 Securtty Equipment
24575 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 22.98 Telephone Service
24576 AT&T Wireless Service 1.50 Cellular Telephone Service
245T7 AWSI 219.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
24578 Battery Specialist, 808.13 Batiedes
24579 Breeaer Construction 1,127.69 Pump Supplies
24580 Brunei Systems.Inc. 18,560.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
24561 Brown&Caldwell 8.274.00 Engineering Serum J-36.1
24582 CaI-Glass,Inc 677.11 Lab Equipment SaMce
24583 Cold Centrifugal Pump 3,926.31 Pump Service&Supplies
24684 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 1,980.00 Engineering Service-Mapping
24585 Chose Menhatian Bank of Texas.N.A. 10.248.50 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
24588 Coast Fire Equipment 229.51 Fire Extinguisher
24687 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 214.67 Lab Supplies
24588 Connell GM Pads 148.61 Truck Supplies
24589 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc 86.57 Electrical Supplies
24590 Cooper Energy Servlcas 11,297.82 Engine Supplies
24501 Copeke Capital.Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease
24592 Oars Laboratories.Inc. 1,000.00 Lab Testing
24593 Corporate Express 331.20 Office Supplies
245% County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,425A3 Electrical Supplies
24595 Crane America Services.Inc. 19,613.51 Ors"SeMcas
Page 1 of 5
Claire Paid Prom 1/1100 to 1115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
24590 Cytec Industries 12.072.15 Antonia Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
24W7 California Municipal Treasures Assoc.(CMTA) 225.00 Seminar Registration
24598 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 192.55 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers
24599 David's Tree Service 475.00 Tree Malnt.Service
24600 Del Mar Analytical 2,560.00 Blosolids Analysis
24601 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 14.585.04 4 Notebook Computers
241102 DeZudk C/O Misco/SOWIWest 5,404.74 Valves
24603 Dun&Bradstreet Business Education Services 195.00 Training Registration
24604 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 32.61 Paint Supplies
24605 DDS Engineering,Inc 11.842.00 Tammany Employment Services
24005 Enchanter,Inc. 1,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-0
24607 Emimnmenlal Express 956.62 Lab Supplies
24608 FedEx Corporation 56.03 Alr Freight
24809 Filter Supply Company 2,732.00 Fibers
24610 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,784.28 Lab Supplies
24611 Fry's Electronics 152.96 Computer Supplies
24612 Full Spectrum Matinee.Inc 420.00 Lab Instrument Service
24613 General Electric Supply Company 1,074AS Electric Parts
24614 GTE California 706.58 Telephone Services
24615 Gledlch-M6chell,Inc. 15.720.15 Bell,Filter Press Supplies
24616 IAW Grainger,Inc 2.917.40 Compressor Supplies
24817 Graphic Design Book Club 31.90 Seeks
24618 Groseby S.T.J. 1,888.94 Engine Supplies
24819 Great Weatem Sanitary Supplies 214.80 Janitorial Supplies
M 24620 GS Edwards,Div.of GS Bldg.Systems Corp. 4.250.00 Safety Service Alinement
24621 Harold Pdmroae Ice 48.110 Its For Samples
ly 24622 HIM.Inc. 311.45 Toole
N 24623 Home Depot 351.37 Smell Hardware
24824 Hub Ado Supply 44.59 Truck Pads
246M City of Huntington Beech 11,984.77 Water Use
24626 Indusdal Air Cernmesser 2.801.50 Equipment Rental
24627 Industrial Threaded!Products,Inc. 2.666.00 Machanlcel Peda It Supplies
24628 StetaNet 200.00 Online Service
24829 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 90.92 Lab Supplies
24630 Integrated Sign Assoc. 7,212.04 CNG Station Signs
24631 Intelllsye Group,Inc 3.771.26 Computer Supplles
2032 Interstate Battery Systems mega Batteries
24633 IMrre Photo Graphics 19.02 Photographic Sandiest
24634 Algae Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 525.81 Safety Supplies
24635 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc 9.887.25 Misc.Construction Services-"C"Headworks Gate
24636 Jaya Catering 1,528.85 Caledng Services
24637 Johnstone Supply 319.23 Electrical Supplies
24635 Industrial Distribution Group 759.42 Tools
24639 Lab Supped 930.00 Temporary Employment Services
24640 Labwere,Inc. 1.000.00 Lab Information Management System Software NO 2-26.97
24641 LaserAll Corporation 1,571.88 Printer Service Agreement
24642 Lee&Ro,Inc 12.559.91 Engineering Consulting Services-P2 39&P247A
24643 Leols-Nerds 21.17 Books&Publications
24644 The Light House 99.30 Electrical Supplies
24645 MasTea Network Services 17,163.10 Communication Equipment Upgrade
24M MCMasto'Cam Supply Ca. 359.67 Tools
24547 Mee Anayllwl System 4.508.00 Professional SeMas-Toxicity Tasting
Page 2 of 6
Claims Paid From 111100 to 1I15100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
24648 Me0a Muffler 578.25 Truck Supplies
24649 Minarlk 1,540.47 Instrument Supplies
24650 Mission Uniform SeMce 3,276.27 Uniform Rentals
24651 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,428.00 Instruments
24652 National Mlcrocomp Services 2,045.00 SeMce Agreement-Plant Automation
24653 National Plant SeMces,Inc. 12,937.50 Vacuum Truck SeMces
24654 Neal Supply Co. 229.64 Plumbing Supplies
24655 Many Petroleum Co.,Inc. 23,025.9E LubrlcanVP'esol Fuel
24656 The Noom Companies 140.00 Moil Datha ry SeMce
24857 Office Depot Business Services Di, 2,028.35 Office Supplies
24655 OhmaruVEGA Corp. 980.00 Registration
24659 On-Una ENdmnlcs,Inc. 172.96 Electrical Supplies
24660 Oxygen SeMce Company 892.74 Specialty Oases
24681 OCS Reprographics 87.27 Pdnlln9 SeMce-Spec P-173
24662 OCE-USA,Inc. 401.74 Computer Equipment Maint.
24W3 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 427.59 Electrical Supplies
24BU Pacific Bell 17.13 Telephone SeMces
24855 Perin Unlimited 324.39 Truck Supplies
24855 Pierce Chemical 591.54 Lab Supplies
24667 Power Systems Testing Company 6.408.00 Generator Set Repair
24688 Primary Source 1,852.17 Office Furniture
24669 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 4,05.0I Temporary Employment SeMces
24570 DOS,L.L.C. 258.82 Innstment Management Program SeMce
24671 Rockhunl College Comenuing Education ' 308.00 Registration
rt 24672 RPM Electric Motors 2.039.89 Electric Motor Repair
24673 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 2,683.27 Palm Supplies
ly 24674 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1.225.66 Soil Materiels
w 2075 Salety40een 124.00 SeMce Agreement
24676 Seem Industrial Selea 494.08 Mechanical Supplies
24877 SecmdSun 232.22 Light Fixluros
24075 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 290.16 Toole
24879 Slew Instruments 2.392.50 Lab Supplies
24680 Skalar,Inc. 13.62 Lab Supplies
24081 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Cs. 5.081.93 COP Trustee SeMces
24682 Steven Enterprises.Inc. 303.47 Office Supplies
24683 Summit Steal 284.52 Metal
245M Suncor Stainless,Inc. 68.01 Lab Supplies
24685 Sunset Ford 25.28 Truck Supplies
24688 Sunset IndusWal Pans 508.82 Mechanical Supplies
24687 SHRM 2000 1,620.00 Registration
24898 The Merdwood Corporation 3,553.00 Professional SeMces-Blosolids Land Inspection
24669 Thompson Indust0al Supply,Inc. 157.84 Mechanical Supplies
24690 Thyssen Darer Elevator Corporation 127.50 Senior Maintenance
24691 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
24692 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 428.41 Tuck Supplies
24693 Truesdell Labomtodes.Inc. 80.00 Lab Barvkes
24694 Teksystems 2.202.50 Temporary Employment SeMces
24685 TRW EMC/Coubmth.Sernxts 600.00 Equipment Car88ca9on
24696 U.S.FIiter Corporation 2.525.50 SeMce Agreement
24597 UIUa Bcientiec 484.93 Lab Supplies
24698 United Parcel Sartre 19.51 Parcel SeMces
Page 3 of 5
Claims Paid From 111100 to IMSM0
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Dencripton
24698 United Pumping Service 1,531.25 Pumping Service
2470D Underground Conviction Technology(UCT) 375.0D Registration
24701 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,0D8.90 Plumblrg Supplies
24702 Valley Detroit Diesel AlHeon 1,700.00 GeneratorRepeir
24703 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 16.168.00 Consulting Services-Capital Facility Capacity Charge Program
247N Village Nurseries 24.22 Landscaping Supplies
24705 VWR Scknllflc Products Corporation 10.590.62 Lab Supplies
247M The Wackenhut Coryoralion 5,906.72 Security Guards
24707 Water Environment Federation 54]5 Publication
24708 Xerox Corporation 6,700.64 Copier Leases
2470E Thomas M.Flanagan 158.23 MeelinglTmining Expema Reimb.
24710 David A.Ludwln 494.99 Meeting7Treiidng Expense Reimb.
24711 Robed J.Taylor 132.49 Mestin97Tralning Expanse Reimb.
24712 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 630.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
24713 Orange County Sanitation Dlstrkt 910.97 Pe0y Cash Reimb.
24714 AdanuuMallory Construc0on Co.,Inc. 25,430.31 ConaWtllon-Sulfur Monitoring Equip.Insranation
24715 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42,911.37 20 Computers&2 Computer Wodksta6om
24716 Orange County Sanitation District 471,469.58 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
24717 American Alrems 3.658.50 Trawl Services
24718 American Express 12,693.40 Purchasing Card Program
24719 Aurora Dale Systems 1.795.00 Software Melnt.Agreement
24720 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.06 Telephone Service
24721 AT&T Wellman Service 4,324.01 Cellular Telephone Service
24M Court Order 479.00 Wage Gamishmeld
24723 Be["Radiator Service 134.6D Truck Repairs
3v 24724 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment1 24725 California Water Awareness Campaign 2000 300.00 Membership
24728 Clayton Group SeMoes,Inc. 10,109.62 Professional Services-P1444
24727 Court Older 681.00 Wage Garnishment
24728 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 269.38 Electrical Supplies
2472D CASA M.60 Conference Registration
24M CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership
24731 D.R.M atly&Associates 4,641.W Registration-Software Thinning
24732 Court Older 811.07 Wage Garnishment
24733 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
24734 Franchise Tax Scarf SZ32 Wage Garnishment
24735 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
24736 GTE Cenfomla 1.370.34 Telephone Stevens
24737 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 87.55 Catering Services
24738 Haw Magazine 64.96 Subscription
24739 Hunts'Final Phase 22,875.00 Mani.Conviction Services-Admin.Bldg.Acoustic Modlfn.
24740 Immlgra0on&Naturalization Service 610.00 Filing Fees
24741 Information Resources 580.00 Human Resources Service
24742 Inn Union of Oper End AFL-CIO Loral 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction
24743 Algae Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 338.78 Safely Supplies
247" Jay's Catering 968.53 Catering Services
24745 Keep Appraisal Service 108A0 Appraisal Service
24746 Lucds 160.75 Meeting Expense
24747 MCR Technologies,Inc. 814.58 Instrument Supplies
24748 Nat West Mariners 750.00 COP Lefler of Credit Fees
24748 Naflomd Technology Transfer,Inc. 2,95100 Training Registration
24750 Orange County Business Council 5W.00 Registration
Pepe 4 of 5 �
u. 4
Claims Paid From 111100 to 1/15100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount _Description
24751 Orange County Family Support 495.80 Wage Garnishment
24752 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage GamlahmeM
24763 Oda Fire Protection 370.00 Swim Agreement
24754 OCB Reprographics 21.01 Pdngng Service-Spec P-173
24755 OCEA 621.43 Dues Deduction
24788 Pacific Publishers 101.22 Publication
24767 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
24756 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
24759 Pea.Om.rs Cowell of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction
2478D Pryor Resources,Inc. 59.00 Training Registration
24761 Pulsefesder,Inc. 68513 Pump Supplies
24762 Roudedge 122.95 Publiaion
24763 S.ti Specialty Gans,Inc. 1,154.84 Specialty Gases
24764 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 29.05 Tools
24705 So.Cal.Gas Company 6,892.37 Natural Gas
24788 So6Vlek Computer Products 1,348.54 Computer Supplies
24767 Southern California Edison 8,230.59 Porker
24768 Southern California Water 64.46 Water U.
24769 Slate of California 148.04 Wage Garnishment
24770 SARBS-PDC 500.00 Training Registration
24771 United Steles Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage
24772 Board of Regems 775.00 Seminar Registration
24773 WEF Membership 130.00 Membership
24774 Zymark Corporation 2,180.00 Lab Supplies
24775 ZD Journals 89.00 Publlcetion
24778 Philip F.Cordova 65.63 Mnting?reining Expense Relmb.
7 24777 Thomas M.Flanagan 1,432.42 Meating/Trslning Expense Relmb.
N 24775 L.Kevin Handed 1,900.00 Mesting/rraInlllg Expense Relmb.
24779 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 435.00 Semr Swim Fees Admin.
24780 Janlos Debay 650.00 Meeting/rralning Expense Relmt.
24781 Norman Eckenrode 2D0.00 Meoting/Tralning Expense Relmb.
24782 Peter M.Green 650.00 MeetigRralntng Expense Relmb.
24783 James W.Silva 650.00 Meetlntin alning Expense Relmb.
Total Accounts Payable-Mmmes $ 2,014,332.09
Pavroll Dlsbureemants
17609-17813 Employee Paychecks $ 21.698.19 Torminallon
17614.17761 Employee Paychecks 293,608.04 Bhvnkly Payroll 1/12ro0
17762-17763 Employee Paychecks 375.90 Adjustments
45251-458M Direct Deposit Statements 821,217.33 Bireekly Payroll i/12J00
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 936,899.55
Wtm Transfer Pavmonle
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,164,07 December Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Pamclpatlon
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 207.451.26 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Sodas A Certificate of Participation
Slate Street Bank S Trust Co.of Ca. 179,589.80 December Internal Payment on 1980-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Tetsl Wire Transfer Payments It 536.195.13
Total Claims Paid 111100-1116100 E 4,0117A 77
Page 5 of 5
Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
247M Barclays Bank PLC $ 90,667.39 COP Lefler of Credit
24785 RPI/Bio Gro 371,131.75 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
24786 Blue Crass of California 172,318.81 Medical Insurance Premium
24787 Carollo Engineers 65.937.19 Engineering Services-J-254&J-39
24788 Delta Dental 41,701.89 Dental Insurance Plan
24789 DukeSolutions,Inc. 100,057.29 Natural Gas-Spec&170
24790 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 49,842.44 Misc.Construction Services-Demolition&Replacement of Clarifier Feed Well
24791 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium
24792 Kemlmn Pacific.Inc. 234,052.39 Ferric Chloride MO 947-95
24793 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 129,899.96 Engineering Services J42
24794 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 37,694.28 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
24795 Polydyne,Inc. 65,117.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
24796 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72.318.15 Ocean Monitoring MO 641A4
24797 Southern California Edison 52,167.76 Power
24798 SPEC Services.Ina 103,650.32 Engineering Services J-33-1
24799 Tule Ranch/Magan Fame 50.032.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
24800 Villa Ford 33,564.10 (2)2000 Ford Ranger PN
24801 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 75.126.45 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
24802 Western States Chemical,Inc. 39,635.53 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
24803 Woodruff,Spmdlin&Smart 108,774.55 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
24804 Advance Constructors,Ina. 31,490.00 Construction 541-1
24805 Margate Construction,Ina 395,148.00 Construction P2-39
rt 24WS NCCI Enterprises,Ina 31,537.35 Engineering Services 240
m 24807 S.S.Mechanical Corp 277,438.07 Construction P146-2&J-63
i. 24808 Southern Contracting Company 188,194.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
24609 A-Plus Systems 120.00 Notion&Ads
24810 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 1,905.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
24811 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 Lab Supplies
24812 Airborne Express 64.75 Air Freight
24813 Aladdin House 393.97 Window Blinds
24814 Porten Industries 6,707.18 Lab Supplies
24816 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 360.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
24816 Appleons Employment Service 3,919.81 Temporary Employment Services
24817 Applied Industrial Technology 697.02 Electrical Parts&Supplies
24818 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 7,950.00 Toxicity Testing
24819 Arcus Data Security 106.80 O6ske Back-Up Tape Storage
24620 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services
24821 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 1,515.08 Waste Removal
24822 The Oulkset OrganlzationlAssoa Concrete 299.98 Concrete
24823 ASS Automation,Inc. 356.92 Instrument Service Maim.
24824 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 1.002.46 Ceiling Tile
24825 APEX Communications 12.48820 Security Equipment
24826 ASRAnalysls 320.00 Vibration Analysis 7.7.1
24827 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 119.04 Telephone Service
24828 AWSI 63.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
24829 Battery Speclall 125.20 Batteries
24830 Brenner Construction 1.774.38 Pump Supplies
Page 1 of 8 e _
u ry
Claims Paid From 1/16100 to 1131100
Warrant No. Vandor Amount Descripdon
24831 Bristol Systems,Inc. 18.960.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
24832 BNI Building News IW.94 Publication
24833 California Automatic Gale 2,116.68 Service Agreement
24834 California Relcation Services,Inc. 412.50 Office Moving Services
24835 Caltrol,Inc. 2,292.87 Eledrial Parts&Supplies
24836 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator
24837 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 8,635.00 Engineering Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension
24838 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,401.56 Instrument Pads
24838 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 1,364.55 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene
24840 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 4.580.16 Computer Marl.Agreement
24841 Consolidated Elect,Distributors,Inc. 6,886.65 Electrical Supplies
24942 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 351.29 Plumbing Supplies
24843 Continental Laboratory Products,Inc. 3,230.04 Lab Supplies
24844 Controfoo 564.87 Electrical Supplies
24845 Converse Consultant. 1,277.00 Consulting Services-P2-60
U846 Cooper Energy Services 674.04 Engine Supplies
24847 Corporate Express Imaging 6,892.77 Misc.Computer Supplies
24848 Corporate Express 1.353.51 Office Supplies
24849 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 24,220.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
t+] 24811 Cost Containment Solutions 700.78 Workees Comp.Services
% 24851 Cotelli9enl 4,304.75 Training Registration
24852 County of Orange-Auditor Controller , 245.00 Communicatlon Service Agreement
N. 24853 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,353.47 Electrical Supplies
rt 24SU Crane America Services,Inc. 913.33 Crane Services
24855 Crane Valve Group 72.50 Publication
24856 Creative Business Concepts 1.072.75 Professional Service-Computer
24867 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
24858 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 6,385.21 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers
24859 CR&R,Inc. 1,8g0.00 Container Rentala
24860 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 5,960.00 Lab Analysis
24861 De Guells&Sons Glass Co. 90.10 Safety Glass
24862 Del Mar Analytical 019.20 Siosollds Analysis
24883 Del Direct Sales L.P. 8.406.66 6 H.P.Printers
24864 De2urlk C/O Mlsco/SouthWest 6.530.23 Values
24865 Diamond H Recognition 815.94 Employee Service Awards
248M Digdec Corp 363.60 Printer Maint.
24867 Dunn-Edward.Corporation 29.63 Paint Supplies
24868 DDB Engineering,Inc. 4,455.00 Temporary Employment Services
24869 DGA Consultants,Inc. 13,140.00 Surveying Services MO 64194
24870 Enchanter,Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
24871 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 6.651.66 Consulting Services-FIS Support
24872 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 2,095.60 Lab Supplies
24873 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,129.96 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
24874 EXFO-Electra Optical Engineering,Inc 42D.00 Electrical Supplies
24875 Faxpresa,Inc. 735.94 Office Supplies
24876 FedEx Corporation 133.59 Air Freight
24877 Filter Supply Company 267.20 Fillers
24878 First Amedun Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From 1116MO to 1131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
24579 First Metro Appraisals 5,5110.00 Sakloka Easement Appraisal
24880 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,197.52 Lab Supplies
24881 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 160.00 Concrete Cutting
24882 Flo-Systems,Inc. 407.30 Pump Supplies
24883 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 5,010.00 Standby Generators Rental
24884 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,906.94 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium
24885 Fountain Valley Camem IGM92 Photo Supplies
24886 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 459.11 Track Wash Tickets
24887 Fountain Valley Palms.Inc. 246.01 Paint Supplies
24888 Franklin Covey Co. 199.00 Training Registration
24889 Fry's Electronics 140.05 Computer Supplies
24890 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.717.32 Lumber/Hardware
24891 GTE California 2.334.91 Telephone Services
24892 George Yardley Co. 645.72 Lab Supplies
24893 Gieriich-Mitchell,Inc. 7,58754 Beft,Filter Press Supplies
24894 Global Engineering Documents 103.33 Publication
24895 Goldensest Window Service 1,844.00 Window Cleaning Service
24896 VAN Grainger,Inc. 1,404.05 Compressor Supplies
24897 Graphic Controls 668.05 Office Supplies
24898 Graphic Distributors 469.36 Photographic Supplies
24899 Graseby S.T.I. 4,301.94 Engine Supplies
r 24900 Hach Company 2,068.44 Lab Supplies
Q 24901 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples
r
rt 24902 Herrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 12.14 Plumbing Supplies
m 24903 Hems Woodcraft Bakery&Dell 58.00 Catering Services
w 249N The Holman Group 704.32 Employee Assistance Program Promium
24905 Holmes&Narvor,Inc. 1,192.77 Engineering Services P7<4-4
24906 Home Depot 1,262.86 Small Hardware
24907 Idou 22,784.33 Lab Supplies
24908 Imaging Plus,Inc. 262.67 Printing Service
24909 Irvine Photo Graphics 662.02 Photographic Services
24910 Irvine Ranch Water District 32.54 Water Use
24911 ISCO CIO MRC Technology 3,879.00 Lab Supplies
24912 IBM Corp. 6.075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease
24913 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade
24914 IECOC 22.00 Registration
24915 Align Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 274.95 Safety Supplies
24916 J&8 Auto Parts 127.74 Auto Pads&Supplies
24917 J&W Scientific 751.34 Lab Supplies
24918 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc 633.96 Instrument Supplies
24919 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 21,727.12 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Sodas
24920 Jay's Catering 500.33 Catering Services
24921 Jobs Available,Inc. 147.20 Notices&Ads
24922 Jomrak 95.00 Notices&Ads
24923 Johnstone Supply 209.15 Electrical Supplies
24924 K S.Dunbar B Associates 11,250.00 Engineering Services 241
24925 Karen Monaco&Associates 2,000.00 Dale Integration Pmject Services
24925 Kelly Paper 504.92 Paper
Page 3 of 8
b
Claims Paid From 1110M to 1131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
24927 Industrial Distribution Group 5.964.00 Toob
24928 League of CA Cities all Registration
24929 Gerald R.Jones 9,087.13 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
24930 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. 1,120.00 Architectural Services
24931 Mantek 319.45 Pest Control Supplies
24932 MarVac Electronics 315.50 Instrument Supplies
24933 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 241,10 Tools
24934 Mec Analytical System 2.225.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
24935 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 855.00 Pumping Equipment Repair
24936 Mission Uniform Service 4.813.89 Uniform Rentals
24937 Mitchell Instrument Co. 39.00 Instruments
24938 Morton Salt 562,29 Sall
24939 Motion Industries 369.40 Pump Supplies
24940 MoloPholo 493.56 Photographic Services
24941 Management Action Programs,Inc. 2,200.00 Registration
24942 Nasco 345.7E Instrument Supplies
24943 National Microcemp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
24944 Nicholas Natty 460.00 Legal Fees
24945 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc, 10,W8.44 Lub icantlDiesel Fuel
24946 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 5,609.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
24947 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,945.48 Office Supplies
24948 The Ohmad CorpomtionNEGA Corp. 1,738.00 Training Registration
r• 24949 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 2,33761 Electrical Parts&Supplies
'Y 24950 Oracle Corp 3.677.86 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement
24951 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 434.31 Plumbing Supplies
24952 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1.151.97 Fillings
24953 Ort¢Fire Protection 2AN-00 Service Agreement
24954 Oxygen Service Company 2,625.07 Specialty Gases
24955 OC6 Reprographics 3.378.23 Printing Service-Spec P-173
24956 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 421.02 Electrical Supplies
24957 Pacific Bell 50.46 Telephone Services
24968 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
24959 Pacific lnlustdal Supply 8920 Furniture
249W Pacific Mechanical Supply 5,513.67 Plumbing Supplies
24961 Pagenet 1,891-69 Paging Services
24962 Panemetacs 375.96 Instrument Supplies
24963 Parker Hannifin Coryoration 43.16 Mechanical Supplies
24964 Patriot Video Productions 1,028.96 Video Taping Services
24965 Percival Scientific 3,052.00 Lab Supplies
24966 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 320.95 Fillers
24967 Pod Supply 11.16 Rope
24968 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 491.07 EleMcal Supplies
24969 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental
24970 Cambridge integrated Service 2.083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
24971 Primary Source 11.393,42 Office Furniture
24972 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 4.506.04 Temporary Employment Services
24973 Professional Publications,Inc. 147.45 Publication
24974 Projects Partners 17,80285 Temporary Employment Services
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
24975 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1.714.50 Mechanical Supplies
24976 PCS Express 292.40 Courier Service
24977 PIHRA 300.00 Notices&Ads
24978 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 2,W8.82 Instrument Supplies
24978 Rain for Rent 2,798.15 Pump Rental
249M Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2.370.44 Trash Removal
24981 Red Wing Shoes 122.40 Relmburseble Safety Shoes
24982 Reliastar 22,068.53 Employee Medical Health Premium
24983 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,447.14 Life Insurance Premium
24954 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 1,012.86 Pump
24985 RPM Electric Motors 178.10 Electric Motor Repair
24986 Safety-Kleen 11,252.71 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste
24987 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 2,301.46 Specialty Gases
24988 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc 355.00 Lab Repairs
24989 Seavlaual Consulting,Inc. 6.468.66 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
2499D SecondSun 149.19 Light Fbdums
24991 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 339AS Tools
24992 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,225.27 Tools/Hardware
24993 Stamens Building Technologies,Inc. 6.085.00 Air Conditioner Automation System
24994 Slavers Instruments 2.409.30 Lab Supplies
24995 Skala,, Inc. 880.22 Lab Supplies
24996 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 311.15 Plumbing Supplies
F„ 24997 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,961.49 Natural Gas
tt 24998 S000-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Supplies
24989 SoftCholce 1.498.81 Software
th 25000 South Coast Air Duality Management Dist. 1,967.60 Emission Fees
25001 Sparkletts 2,177.51 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
25002 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 122.75 Pump Supplies
25003 State Board of Equalization 962.41 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee
25004 Strata International,Inc 926.98 Chemicals
26OD5 Suceasaorles,Inc. 975.06 Pictures for New Plant 2 Maint.Bldg.
260M Summit Steel 1.000.17 Metal
25007 Sun-Bell Landscape&Maintenance 1,300.D0 Landscape Maint.
250DB Sunset industrial Pads 5,080.46 Mechanical Supplies
250D9 Super Chem Corporation 969.75 Chemicals
25010 SKC-West,Inc. 859.74 Safely Supplies
2501/ Taylor-Dunn 12,603.70 Electric Cad Pane
25012 Thermo Optak Corporation 1,850.00 Lab Equlpmerd Software Agreement
25013 Finnigan-A ThermoDuest Subsidiary 2,090.35 Lab Supplies
25014 Thomas M.Dowes 3,145.00 Professional Services MO 4-23.97
25015 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 177.60 Mechanical Supplies
25D76 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 504.31 Locks&Keys
25017 Total Air Analysis,Inc. 400.00 Lab Testing Service
25018 Than Consulting Engineers 21,550.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects
25019 TNesdall Laboratories,Inc 80.00 Lab Services
25020 Teksyslems 4,912.50 Temporary Employment Services
25021 U.S.Filler Corporation 1,202.75 Service Agreement
25022 United Parcel Service 741.87 Pmcel Services
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100
Wemnt No. Vendor Amount Description
25023 Unocal Corporation 31 AS Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 348.3
25024 V&A Consulting Engineers 14,36&72 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection
25025 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,975.00 Consulting Services-Web Programming
26028 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,342.90 Vision Service Premium
25027 VWR Scientific Products Corporation %954.79 Lab Supplies
25028 The Wackenhut Corporation 14,099.68 Security Guams
26029 Wears Corporation 405.00 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment
25030 Weds Sanitary Supply 146.14 Janitorial Supplies
25031 Western Highway Products,Inc 244.99 Pavement Marker Supplies
25032 WEF Membership 96.00 Membership
25033 Xerox Corporation 5,232.80 Copier Lasses
25034 Ark Construction Company 7.058.88 Construction P7444
25035 Dionne Kemos 1,747.23 Employee Computer Loan Program
25036 Orange County Bankston District 24.029.12 Workers Comp.Relmb.
25037 Orange County Sanitation District 160.27 Petty Cash Reimb.
25038 Robert Scot Polk&Dell Computer Corp. 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
25039 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 31,T71.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25M Orange County Sanitation District 509,511.63 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
26041 Sunset Beach San6ary District 55,000.00 Construction-J-73 CooperatNe Projects Program
25042 Air Industries 3,049.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25043 Aluminum Forge 669.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
26W Aluminum Precision 447.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25045 American Banker Newsletters 1,239.13 Publication
rt 25046 Anaheim Memorial Medical Center 7.103.09 Reconciliatlon User Fee Refund
25047 ASCE,Orange County Branch 50.00 Registration
on on 25048 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 380.99 Telephone Service
25049 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 104.46 Telephone Service
25050 Ball Pipe&Supply Co. 76.14 Valve Supplies
25051 Court Omer 564.00 Wage Garnishment
26052 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
25053 BdndlwThomas Oil Company 287.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25054 Case Swayne,Inc. 3,473.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25055 Chapman House,Inc. 3.450.00 Training Registration
25056 Circuit Connection 946.94 Reconcillatlon User Fee Refund
26057 City of Fountain Valley 16.896.03 Water Use
25M Court Omer 581.00 Wage Garnishment
25059 Consolidated Elea.Distributors,Inc. 471.23 Electrical Supplies
25060 Cot0ligent 7,500.00 Training Registration
25061 Dawson Company 2,489.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25052 DeIndRigid-Flex,Inc. 234.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25063 Dunham Metal Processing 102.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25064 Dye Technique 1,163.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25065 Court Omer 741.50 Wage Garnishment
25066 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment
26067 GTE California 4,407.44 Telephone Somicas
25068 George Jones 124.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25069 Goodwin Company 5.520.97 Reconciliatlon User Fee Refund
25070 City of Huntington Beach 11,961.33 Water Use
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 1/16100 to 1I31100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25071 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 62.32 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
25072 Inlemem 1,454.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25073 Intl Unlon of Oper Eng AFL-C10 Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction
25074 Irvine Ranch Water District 24.22 Water Use
25075 Ken Compenies/ExemProv,Inc. 375.00 Training Expense
25076 Lem-Plate Tech 173.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25077 Lexls Publishing 799.50 Publication
25078 Lustre-Cal 517.01 Labels
25079 Martin Luther Hospital 1.392.96 Remndliallon User Fee Refund
25090 MarVac Electronics 198.65 Instrument Supplies
25081 Mask Technology,Inc. 1,278.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25082 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA,Inc. 182.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25083 Moravek Blachemlcals,Inc. 297.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
26084 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 695.00 Training Registration
25085 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 179.10 Electrical Pane 6 Supplies
25086 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 157.52 Plumbing Supplies
25087 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
25088 Orange County Forum 350.00 Registration
25089 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
25090 OCEA 614.78 Dues Deduction
25091 Pacific Ball 1.074.85 Telephone Services
25092 Pacific Quartz,Inc. 1,683.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25093 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
25094 Court Order 295.00 Wage Garnishment
25095 Peace Officals Council of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction
250M California Flneblanking Corp. 195.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25097 Premn,Inc. 136.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25098 Prudential Overall Supply 3,680.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25099 PCA Metal Finishing 4,534.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25100 Quality Soldering,Inc. 34.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25101 OLP Laminates,A Divison of AMP,Inc. 11.741.10 Reconcillation User Fee Refund
25102 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 455.48 Paint Supplies
26103 Sheraton Newport Beach 2,000.00 Meeting Expanse -Huntington Beach Issue
25104 Shureluck Sales B Engineering 93.52 Tools/Herdwere
25105 So.Cal.Gas Company 46.92 Natural Gas
26105 Solder Station One Inc-West 136.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund -
25107 South Coast Circuits,Inc. 639.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25108 South Coast Oil Corp 211.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25109 South Coast Water 873.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25110 Southern California Academy of Sciences 1,200.00 Publications
25111 Slate of California 170.29 Wage Garnishment
25112 Stalek Corporation 672.00 Remndllation User Fee Refund
26113 Steelcass 580.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
26114 Sunset Environmental 101.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25115 Sunset Environmental 34.38 Remndllation User Fee Refund
25116 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration
25117 BPS Technologies 535.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
26118 SSE Manufacturing,Inc. 5,696.16 Reconciliation User Fee Rotund
Page 7 of 8 e
Claims Paid From 1110100 to 1/31100 a ,
Warrant No. Vandor Amount Descrip0or,
25119 Taormina Industries,Inc. 1.213.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25120 The Orange County Register 737.10 Notices 8 Ads
25121 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,621.36 Mechanical Supplies
25122 Todd's Enterprises 020.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25123 Tomell A Co0en 957.83 Legal Services-Surge Claim
25124 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 249.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25125 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 126.00 Registration
25128 UC Regents 125.00 Registration
25127 UCLA Institute of Ne Environment 10,000.00 Coastal Water Quality Research Contribution
26128 Vasco Electro Lab 57.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25129 Vartep Process Systems 2.311.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25130 Vibration Institute 1,076.00 Training Registration
25131 Villa Park Orchards Assoc. 329.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25132 Vogel PetersonFumBure Co. 784.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25133 Welker Custom Coaling 57.00 Raconcillation User Fee Refund
25134 Wineries(Bma) 3,297AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25135 200018NVy-CWEA,Inc 3.000.00 Training Registration
25135 Patrick B.Carnahan 1.405.03 Meeling/freining Expense Reimb.
25137 Tom L Josway 1,124.74 Meeling/framing Expense Reimb.
25138 Gregory R.Mathews 483.60 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb.
25139 Peter M.Morrison 1,029.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb,
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.283.659.89
Y
rt Payroll Dlsbureements
17764-17968 Employee Paychecks $ 116.906.48 BOP
Do 17959-19094 Employee Paychecks 180.513.62 Bhvaekly Payroll 1/128I00
18095-18119 Employee Paychecks 4.664.17 Adluabnents
45635-46075 Direct Depose Statements 703,003.51 Biweekly Payroll 1/128/00
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,005,089.78
Wine Transfer Pavments
Chase Bank of Texas Natural Association $ 408.678.43 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series B CeNBcale of Participation
State Street Bank 5 Trust Co.of Co. 3,102,700.90 February Interest Payment on 1990.92 Advance Refund Certificate of Participation
Total Who Transfer Payments $ 3.509.370.33
Total Claims Paid 111619a-1/31100 $ 8,798,129.00
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng Date Ta ad.of Dk.
3fayoo
AGENDA REPORT �Number 'en ty nbe,
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: NIA)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
\VaEa'iVAat\vq MVn\}2PeMYY�B\VRF0.ESYJamapoq Mc
aew.q snow Page 7
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 2/1/00 -- 2/15/00 & 2116/00— 2131/00.
BA
\YN]nMalaldy.EldVnV3VaNtlAe\VR(0.E5`tlunap9tl Mic
a..eea �e Page 2
< m -
Claims Paid From 2/1/00[0 2/16/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Amounts Payable-Warrants
26140 Voided Check $ - -
25141 Computerized Facility Integration 252,003.57 Engineering Service J-25-1
25142 County of Orange 200,481.22 Construction 11-17.2
25143 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 31,715.00 Painting Maint Services MO 4-22-98
25144 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 86.620.04 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95
25145 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 33.457.60 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99
25146 Persons Engineering Science,Inc. 206,077.70 Engineering Services J-42
25147 Sencon Engineering,Inc. 32,629.85 Construction-Revenue Area No.7 Pipe Repairs
25148 South Coast Environmental Co. 91,630.00 Plant 2 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
26149 Southern California Gas Company 32,424.00 Natural Gas
25150 Voided Check - -
25151 Taylor-Dunn 31,560.57 Electric Cad Parts
26152 Tole Ranch/Magan Farms 78.131.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
25153 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 25.544.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Computer Programming
25154 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 704.250.00 Construction 3-35R 83.11R
25165 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 477,508.19 Construction 3.38-1
25166 Union Bank of Califomia 53,056.46 Construction 3.38-1
25167 Union Bank of California 78.250.00 Construction 3.35
25168 Colich Bros. Ine.,DBA Colich&Sons 311,500.00 Construction 11-17-1 Litigation Settlement
25159 A-Plus Systems 2.289.30 Notices B Ads
25160 Great American Printing Co. 232.14 Office Supplies
25161 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1,000.00 Training Registration
25162 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lob Supplies
25163 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 1,200.00 Human Resources Service
26164 American Industrial Supply.Inc. 509.98 Building Supplies
25165 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
25166 Appleone Employment Service 5,730.67 Temporary Employment Services
25167 Arcus Data Security,Inc 106.80 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage
25168 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 552.00 Vacuum Truck Services
26169 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
25170 Aztec Supply Company 8,332.00 Construction-Maintenance Mezzanine
25171 ABBE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 2.355.00 Registration
25172 AT&T Wireless Services 3.725.32 Cellular Telephone Service
25173 AT&T Wireless Services 681.17 Cellular Telephone Supplies
25174 Battery Specialties 1,959.29 Batteries
25175 Best Towing Service 464.00 Towing Services
25176 Boyle Engineerng Corporation 5,474.65 Engineering Services 3.38.1 8 7-7-1
25177 Brown&Caldwell 22.385.94 Engineering Service P137&P2-35-3
25178 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,490.00 Pump Repair
25179 Carollo Engineers 937.12 Professional Service-User Fees Analysis
25180 Carollo Engineers 5,844.14 Engineering Services-J-59
25181 Cathcart Garda von Langen Engineers 1,570.00 Engineerng Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension
26182 Charles P.Crowley Co. 24.24 Instrument Pads
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From V11100 to 2M6/o0
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25183 Clarl4i0 of California,Inc. 193.95 Forklift Rental
25184 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 231.34 Office Supplies
26185 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,636.26 Electrical Supplies
25166 Contractors License Exam Center,Inc 2,225.00 Training Registration
25187 Cooper Energy Services 438.27 Engine Supplies
25188 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease
25189 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 6 MAP Training
25190 Corporate Express 652.58 Office Supplies
25191 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.84 Truck Parts
25192 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 819.76 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
25193 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 134.20 Communication Service Agreement
25194 County of Orange 66.00 Permit Fees
25195 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,926.97 Electrical Supplies
25198 CASA 11,000.00 Membership
25197 CDS/NEDCO 129.15 Electrical Supplies
2519B CSMFO 2000 Annual Conference 135.00 Registration
26199 David Wood Associates,Inc. 1,190.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 6 MAP Training
25200 Del Mar Analytical 1,186.00 Siosolids Analysis
25201 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 105.00 Paint Supplies
25202 DDB Engineering, Inc 9,256.50 Temporary Employment Services
25203 DGA Consultants, Inc. 6,157.00 Surveying Services MO 6A-94
252D4 Eberhard Equipment 657.28 Tractor Repair
25205 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 3,909.00 Medical Screening
26206 Electra-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25207 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,156.93 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
25208 Faxpress, Inc. 134.15 Printing Service
25209 FedEx Corporation 99.20 Air Freight
26210 Filter Supply Company 256.74 Filters
25211 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1.995.24 Lab Supplies
25212 Foothill Engineering 6 Dewatering, Inc. 12,777.50 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
25213 Forked Engineering 6 Surveying,Inc. 16,627.58 Engineering Services P-183
25214 Fountain Valley Camera 213.04 Photo Supplies
25215 Fred Pryor Seminars 3.000.00 Training Registration
25216 Fry's Electronics 2,423.82 Computer Supplies
25217 Full Spectrum Anayecs, Inc. 420.00 Lab Instrument Service
26218 FM International, Inc. 17,414.26 Professional Services J-25-1
25219 Ganahl Lumber Company 370.75 Lumber/Hardware
25220 George Yardley Co. 6.99 Lab Supplies
25221 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Supplies
25222 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. M51 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
26223 Goldenwest Window Service 250.00 Window Cleaning Service
25224 WW Grainger, Inc 215.31 Compressor Supplies
25225 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 78.69 Janitorial Supplies
25226 Hach Company 1,039.08 Lab Supplies
Page 2of7 '+'
Claims Paid From 211100 to 2116100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25227 Heiman Fire Equipment,Inc. 3,682.43 Safety Equipment
25228 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 144.00 Catering Services
25229 Home Depot 2.188.63 Small Hardware
25230 Hopkins Technical Products 1,272.04 Pump Supplies
25231 Hub Auto Supply 407.75 Truck Parts
25232 HI Standard Automotive 346.33 Automotive Supplies
25233 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,474.73 Printing Service
25234 Immigration&Naturalization Service 610.00 Filing Fees
25236 Industrial Motor&Control, Inc. 2,881.00 Instrument Supplies
26238 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 287.25 Lob Supplies
26237 International Time Recorder 305.00 Safety Supplies
25238 Interstate Battery Systems 185.25 Batteries
25239 Irvine Photo Graphics 23.56 Photographic Services
25240 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
25241 IBM Corporation 359A9 IBM AS/400 Upgrade
25242 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,582.57 Safety Supplies
25243 J.G.Tucker and Son. Inc. 6,355.75 Instrument Supplies
25244 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 7,944.46 Min.Constr.Serv.-Clean Junction Box, Install Safety Shower&Manhole Repair
26245 Jays Catering 8.419.15 Directors Meeting Expenses
25246 Jensen Instruments Co. 351.27 Instrument Supplies
25247 Jlm's Suspension Service 111.72 Truck Repairs
25248 Johnstone Supply 104.10 Electrical Supplies
25249 Karen Monaco&Associates 4,875.00 J.D.Edwards Service Agreement
25250 Kensington Electronics 813.53 Electrical Supplies
25251 Ken Companies/ExeouProv, Inc. 375.00 Registration
25252 Knowledge Point 130.50 Software Malnt.
25253 Knoxtindustrial Distribution Group 2,337.29 Tools
25254 Line-X Protective Coalinga 337.38 Vehicle Maint.
25255 Oareld R.Jones 6,174.47 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
25256 Lorman Education Services 189.00 Registration
25257 Lucci's 95.00 Meeting Expense
25258 Mamco International 835.33 Janitorial Supplies
25259 Mandic Motors 45.00 Towing Services
25260 MarVac Electronics 30.17 Instrument Supplies
25261 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 566.04 Tools
25262 McMurray-Slam 240.00 Office Supplies
25263 Mee Analytical System 10.075.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
25264 Medlin Controls Co. 1,697.77 Instrument Supplies
25265 Mesa Muffler 308.69 Truck Supplies
25266 Mettler-Toledo 10,67SAl WinBridge Standard Software Update
25267 Midway City Sanitary District 18,887.69 Construction J-73 Cooperative Project Program
25268 Midway Mfg It Machining Co. 10.927.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25269 Mission Uniform Service 2,098.88 Uniform Rentals
25270 Motorola Communications&Electronics 21.600.63 Communication Equipment
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 211100 to 2115/00
Warred No. Vendor Amount Description
25271 N.Glantz&Son 53.88 Tools
25272 Neal Supply Co. 108.61 Plumbing Supplies
25273 Network Generations, Inc. 437.20 Computer Supplies
25274 Nicholas Chevrolet 154.29 Truck Repairs
25275 Nmyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 7.147.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
25276 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
25277 Office Depot Business Services Div. 367.91 Office Supplies
25278 Optic,Software 1,8W.00 Optic,Form Implementation
25279 O ange County Sanitation District 126.81 Petty Cash Reimb.
25280 Oxygen Service Company 1,898.15 Specialty Gases
25281 OCB Reprographics 183.37 Printing Service-Spec P-173
25282 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 58.19 Electical Supplies
25283 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,248.90 Plumbing Supplies
25284 Prkhouse Tire Co. 211.55 Tires
25285 Parts Unlimited 365.68 Truck Supplies
25286 Penhall Company 12,000.00 Construction-Plant 2 Warehouse Removal
25287 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,398.29 Lab Supplies
25288 Permaseal 8W00 Lube Oil
25289 Pima Gm Systems,Inc, 18,252.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
25290 Pitney Bowes 355.04 Postage Machine Service Agreement
25291 Pool Supply of Orange County 832.61 Operating Supplies
25292 Primary Source 10,023.17 Office Furniture
25293 PSI 951.61 Hardware
25294 0 Air-Calif.Div.Pump Engineering 307.50 Air Compressor Repair
25285 COS,LL.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
26296 Rick Buck 456.41 Recenciliafion User Fee Refund
25297 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 665.81 Auto Repair
25298 George L.Robertson 325.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25299 Rutan B Tucker L.L.P. 203.25 Legal Services-Craw-Winthrop Development
2530D RMS Systems Inc 339.00 Software Maim.
25301 RPM Electric Motors 1,87&25 Electric Motor Repair
25302 Santa Ana Electric Motors 540.91 Motor Repair
25303 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 122.48 Mechanical Supplies
25304 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1,000.59 Specialty Gases
25305 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 1,935.75 Lab Repairs
25306 Second-Sun 2,584.96 Light Fcdures
25307 Self-insurance Plans 948.61 State Workers'Compensation User Funding&Fraud Assessment
25308 Sheen Magan 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land
25309 Sheen Magan, Inc, 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land
25310 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 32.87 Tools
25311 Smmon, Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
25312 Sievers Instruments 320.00 Lab Supplies
25313 Society for HR Management 280.00 Notices&Ads
25314 Spading Instruments, Inc. 4,566.54 Flowmeters
Page 4 of 7 '1 -
a
Claims Paid From 211100 to 2/16/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25315 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton,L.P. 1,282.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25316 Summit Steel 2,128.05 Metal
25317 Sunset Ford 42.58 Truck Supplies
25318 Sunset Industrial Parts 290.53 Mechanical Supplies
25319 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis
25320 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 993.43 Mechanical Supplies
2=1 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,334.93 Elevator Maintenance
25322 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
25323 Lisa L Tomko 500.07 MeeOng/lraining Expense Reimb.
25324 The Trans Company 5,474.09 Electrical Equipment Maint Service&Supplies
25325 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 381.23 Truck Supplies
25326 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 290.00 Lab Services
25327 Teksystems 3.975.00 Temporary Employment Services
25328 V&A Consulting Engineers 1,171.17 Engineering Services-Evaluating 1-12S Odor Treatment for Collection
25329 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.945.95 Plumbing Supplies
25330 Veme's Plumbing 140.00 Plumbing Equipment Testing
25331 VCI Mechanical 690.00 Electrical Service
25332 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,742.00 Lab Supplies
26333 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,906.72 Security Guards
25334 Wayne Electric Co. 599.00 Electrical Supplies
26335 WEF-Registration Dept 1,080.00 Registration
25336 Xerox Corporation 4,798.04 Copier Leases
25337 The Yakima Company 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land
25338 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 864.00 Construction 7-28
25339 Marcus D.Dubois 363.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25340 Donald F.McIntyre 1,675.62 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
25341 Edwin D.Ratiedge 474.80 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb.
25342 Efran G. Lucena&COMP USA 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
25343 Nonna C.Leopando 1,342.55 Employee Computer Loan Program
25344 Orange County Sanitation District 678.12 Petty Cash Reimb.
25345 John W.Weingarden 1,414.85 Employee Computer Loan Program
25346 Barclays Bank PLC 90,687.39 COP Letter of Credit
25347 Cafdomia Dept,of Fish and Game 5.00 Publication
25348 Orange County Sanitation Dishict 71.357.10 Worker's Comp. Reimb.
25349 Orange County Sanitation Dishict 409224.92 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
25360 Southern California Edison 72,169.91 Power
25351 American Chemical Society 845.00 Training Registration
25352 American Express 12,289.52 Purchasing Card Program
25353 American Management Association 149.00 Registration
25354 AMP Incorporated 1,485.00 Training Registration
25355 ASMS Conference 1,600.00 Training Registration
26356 ASSE American Sm.of Safety Engineers 495.00 Registration
25357 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 247.67 Valve Supplies
25358 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 211I00 to ZI16I00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25359 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
25360 Leandre P.Catacutan 343.10 Meeting Expense Reimb.
25361 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
25362 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. BD8.77 Plumbing Supplies
25363 Contractors License Exam Center, Inc. 1,485.00 Training Registration
26364 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
25365 Employers Group 365.00 Registration
25386 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
25367 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
25368 Expertune 598.00 Software Maintenance
25369 ESRI Inc. 1,600.00 Training Registration
25370 Anne Made Peery 274.59 Meeiing/Training Expense Reimb.
25371 Franchise Tax Board 76.76 Wage Garnishment
25372 Robert P.Ghirelli 757.96 Meeting?mining Expense Reimb.
25373 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership
25374 GIS 2000 749.00 Registration
25375 Hassled Methods 2,680.00 Training Registration&Maint.Software
25376 Inti Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction
25377 Alrgas Dlrect Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,459.74 Safety Supplies
25378 ISA 120.00 Membership
26379 Jobtrak 96.00 Notices&Ads
25380 Law Journal Press 65.78 Publication
25381 Lerman Education Services 189.00 Registration
25382 Chris Maher 333.29 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25383 Donald F. McIntyre 180.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25384 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 295.55 Tools
25365 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.013.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25386 Business Training&Development Services 99.00 Training Registration
26387 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,548.00 Training Registration
25388 OhmartNEGA Corp. 495.00 Registration
25389 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
25390 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
25391 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 306.98 Fittings
25392 OCFA 576.95 Dues Deduction
25393 MWDOC 30.00 Training Registration
25394 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
25395 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
25396 Peace Officers Council of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction
25397 Pryor Resources, Inc. 149.00 Training Registration
25398 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 577.63 Paint Supplies
25399 Schenck Trebel 1,700.00 Training Registration
25400 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
25401 SkIIIPath On-Site 199.00 On-Site Training
25402 State of California 126.25 Wage Garnishment
Page 6 of 7 a
c • -
Claim Paid From 2M100 to 2flSMO
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25403 Summit Steel 1,541.77 Metal
25404 SARBS-PDC 750.00 Training Registration
25405 SWOTF-Stonnwater Quality Task Force 10.00 Publication
25406 The Pittsburgh Conference 60.00 Registration
25407 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,992.33 Mechanical Supplies
25408 Robert C.Thompson 181.71 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb.
25409 Mark A.Tomko 402.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25410 The Training Masters 695 0D Training Registration
25411 Trident Data Systems 1,6110.01) Training Registration
25412 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 125.00 Registration
25413 WEF-Registration Dept 450.00 Registration
25414 3 Com Corporation 3,300.OD Training Registration
25415 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,890,782.66
Payroll Disbursements
18120-18283 Employee Paychecks $ 161.076.77 Biweekly Payroll 219100
18284-18286 Employee Paychecks 722.79 Adjustments
46076-46523 Direct Deposit Statements 664,653.81 Biweekly Payroll 2/9100
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 827,053.37
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148,6D6.10 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 177,297.01 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 149,301.95 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Societe Generale 56,456.89 8(1199-1131100 Standby Letter of Credit Payment on 1993 COP
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 531.661.95
Total Claims Paid 211100-2I15100 $ 5.249.497.97
Page 7 of 7
Claim Paid From 2116100 to V29100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
25416 Air Products&Chemicals $ 70,335.39 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
25417 Blue Cross of Caffomia 172.078.12 Medical Insurance Premium
25418 Carollo Engineers 47,321.66 Engineering Services J-25-4
25419 Commercial Resources Tax Group 250,00o.D0 Professional Service-User Fees Admin.
25420 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42,676.36 5 Notebook Computers,9 HP Printers&5 Dell Monitors
25421 Delta Dental 41,663.17 Dental Insurance Plan
25422 DukeSolulions, Inc. 70,323.36 Natural Gas-Spec#170
25423 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25.255.35 Medical Insurance Premium
25424 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 95,027.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
25425 Lee&Ro,Inc. 34.022.79 Engineering Consulting Services-P2 39&P2-47-1
25426 Orange County Water District 176,421.98 Consulting Services J-36
25427 Polydyne,Inc. 43,866.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
25428 Voided Check - -
25429 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 37.479.47 Construction Pi-37
25430 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 69.734.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
25431 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 36.457.20 Construction 541-1
25432 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 27.748.62 Construction 3-38-1
25433 Margate Construction,Inc. 393,900.36 Construction P2.39
25434 S.S.Mechanical Corp 350,847.40 Construction Pi-46-2&J-53
25435 Southern Contracting Company 97,632.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
25436 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3.742.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
25437 Aearo Company 348.00 Safety Supplies
25438 Alrbome Express 133.90 Air Freight
26439 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 630.34 Manhole Frames&Covers
25440 Allina Medical Center 245.00 Employment Medical Services
25441 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Gr 1,200.00 Human Resources Service
26442 American Airlines 2.321.60 Travel Services
25443 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,056.72 Training Materials
25W Appleone Employment Service 6.905.18 Temporary Employment Services
25445 Applied Industrial Technology 3,4D3.70 Electrical Parts&Supplies
25446 Aumm Data Systems 144.80 Software Maint.Agreement
25447 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security Equipment Mainl.
25448 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines Registration-Ignition Timing
25449 ASR Analysis 640.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1
25450 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 35.15 Telephone Service
25451 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,848.14 Long Distance Telephone Service
25452 AT&T Wireless Services 123.40 Cellular Telephone Service
25453 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
25454 Battery Specialties 735.40 Batteries
25455 Bauer Compressors 3,990.05 Tools&Supplies
25456 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 15.868.58 Engineering Services-Can Gen Operating Philosophy Study
Page 1 of 13 a
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25457 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,382.D0 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
25458 California Urban Water Conserv. Council 260.00 Membership
26459 Caltrol, Inc. 2,570.93 Electrical Parts&Supplies
25460 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,056.68 Instrument Parts
25461 Compressor Components Of California 4,697.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25462 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 1.769.79 Computer Maint.Agreement
25463 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 302.78 Electrical Supplies
26464 Consolidated Reprographics 21.60 Printing Services
25465 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 109.98 Plumbing Supplies
25466 Converse Consultants 433.70 Consulting Services-3.38-3
25467 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing
25468 Corporate Express 525.09 Office Supplies
25469 Cotelligem 2,047.50 Software Maint.
25470 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 374.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee
26471 County of Orange 285.50 Permit Fees
25472 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,976.68 Electrical Supplies
25473 Cytec Industries 12,838.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18
25474 CEPA Company 1.121.44 Lab Equipment Maint.Service
25475 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 401.00 CCTV Inspection of Revenue Area 7 Sewers
25476 CWEA Annual Conference 295.00 Conference Registration
25477 David's Tree Service 650.00 Tree Maint.Service
25478 Del Mar Analytical 1,280.00 Biosolids Analysis
25479 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 206.52 Paint Supplies
25480 DAE Instruments 326.75 Electrical Supplies
25481 DGA Consultants, Inc. 5.112.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
25482 Eberhard Equipment 712.54 Tractor Repair
25483 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
25484 Enviro Enterprises 2,193.91 Engineering Service-Trickling Fillers Evaluation
25485 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1,469.58 Software
25486 Faxpress,Inc. 719.23 Office Supplies
25487 FedEx Corporation 168.68 Air Freight
25488 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 317.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25489 Filter Supply Company 432.87 Filters
25490 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 64.46 Lab Supplies
25491 Thomas M.Flanagan 587.94 Meetingfrmining Expense Reimb.
25492 Flo-Systems, Inc. 133.62 Pump Supplies
25493 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,994.37 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium
25494 Fountain Valley Camera 90.32 Photo Supplies
25495 Franklin Covey 59.91 Office Supplies
26496 Fry's Electronics 556.78 Computer Supplies
25497 Full Spectrum Analyfics, Inc. 539.71 Lab Instrument Service
25498 City of Fullerton 111.30 Water Use
Page 2 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25499 Ganahl Lumber Company 168.46 Lumber/Hardware
25500 Garrati-Callahan Company 4,844.77 Investment Advisor Service
25501 General Process Controls 3,449.03 Electrical Supplies
25502 GTE California 8,405.61 Telephone Services
25503 Getinge Castle 600.77 Lab Supplies
25504 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 2,721.64 Belt,Filter Press Supplies
25505 Golden Bell Products 15.295.50 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes
25506 WWGreinger, Inc. 1,417.67 Compressor Supplies
25507 Graseby S.T.I. 5,688.68 Engine Supplies
25508 GE Multilin, Inc. 2,864.00 Consulting Services-Electrical Supplies
25509 Heaker Equipment Company 370.35 Truck Supplies
25510 Hach Company 93.37 Lab Supplies
25511 David P. Halverson 169.71 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
25512 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 916.18 Plumbing Supplies
26513 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Dell 192.70 Catering Services
26514 HIM,Inc. 276.84 Tools
25515 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 2,250.00 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning
25516 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium
25517 Home Depot 681.03 Small Hardware
25518 City of Huntington Beach 48.00 Water Use
26519 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,953.04 Printing Service
25520 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 414.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25521 StaleNst 200.00 Online Service
25522 Information Resources 100.D0 Human Resources Service
25523 Interim Personnel 2.219.18 Temporary Employment Service
25524 ISCO C/O MRC Technology 549.53 Lab Supplies
25525 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 298.82 Safety Supplies
25526 IPI GremmTech, Inc 15,000.00 Software Maint.Agreement
25527 J&B Auto Parts 327.37 Auto Parts 3 Supplies
25528 J.G.Tucker and Son, Ina 378.75 Instrument Supplies
25529 James Martin&Co. 17,368.56 Software Maim.Agreement
25530 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-N 6 MSP Motor Removal
25531 Jay's Catering 210.11 Catering Services
25532 Jensen Instruments Co. 19351 Instrument Supplies
25533 K.S. Dunbar&Associates 8,750.00 Engineering Services 241
25634 K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 1.370.04 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
25535 Karen Monaco&Associates 5.687.50 FIS Support Services
25536 Kelly Paper 416.23 Paper
25537 Knox 2,019.88 Tools
25538 Lab Support 930.00 Temporary Employment Services
25539 Lexis-Nexis 98.27 Books&Publications
25540 Gerald R.Jones 4,505.15 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
Page 3 of 13 e
Claims Paid From 2118/89 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25541 Mine Safety Appliances 271.88 Electrical Supplies
25542 MarVac Electronics 10.52 Electrical Supplies
25543 MasTec Network Services 595.86 Communication Equipment Upgrade
25W Donald F. McIntyre 297.67 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb.
25545 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 319.76 Tools
25546 Mellon Trust 15.815.10 Investment Custodian Bank
25547 Mid-West Associates 43.10 Pump Supplies
25548 Mission UnBonn Service 5,274.47 Uniform Rentals
25649 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 5.230.94 Engineering Service 5-41-1
25550 MotoPhoto 48.22 Photographic Services
25551 Nasco 285.54 Instrument Supplies
25552 National Plant Services, Inc. 1.250.00 Vacuum Truck Services
25653 National Safety Council/Western Region 290.00 Registration
25554 Neal Supply Co. 3.158.16 Plumbing Supplies
25555 NetManage, Inc. 3.313.31 AS/400 Software Maint.
25556 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 17,630.22 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
25557 Network Solutions,lnc. 11,870.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade
25558 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,954.12 Office Supplies
25559 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 318.21 Plumbing Supplies
25560 Orange County Chapter-ISCEBS 25.00 Training Registration
25561 Orange County Sanitation District 22.56 Petry Cash Reimb.
25582 Oxygen Service Company 2,408.83 Specialty Gases
25563 OCB Reprographics 182.96 Printing Service-Spec P-173
25564 OCE-USA, Inc. 678.90 Computer Equipment Maint.
25565 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 120.66 Electrical Supplies
25566 Pacific Bell 16.71 Telephone Services
25567 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
25568 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,281.94 Plumbing Supplies
25569 Parker Hannifin Corporation 46.62 Mechanical Supplies
25570 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 19,450.27 Engineering Services J-42
26571 Peak Technologies 2,680.D9 Lab Supplies
25572 Permaseel 411.77 Luba Oil
25573 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 2.002.24 Temporary Employment Services
25574 Projects Partners 24,107.20 Temporary Employment Services
25575 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2.030.48 Mechanical Supplies
25576 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services
25577 Rain for Rent 2,798.15 Pump Rental
26678 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
26579 Reliastar 7,760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
25580 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 177.88 Electrical Supplies
25581 Russeleclrlc, Inc. 428.41 Electrical Supplies
25582 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 10,914.00 Engineering Services-2 Lunch/Traming Rooms
Page 4 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25583 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 871.68 Mechanical Supplies
25584 Schwing America, Inc. 5.377.77 Pump Supplies
25585 City of Seal Beach 342.70 Water Use
25586 Second-Sun 670.01 Light Fixtures
25587 ShowCase Corporation 2,693.75 Software Maint.
25588 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 556.64 Tools/Hardware
25589 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
25590 So. Cal.Gas Company 22,151.34 Nature)Gas
25591 SoftChoice 1.477.26 Software
26592 Southern California Water Committee, Inc. 750.00 Membership
25593 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 250.00 Flowineter Calibration
25594 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 671.40 Janitorial Supplies
25595 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 506.16 Office Supplies
25596 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
25597 Summit Steel 194.11 Metal
25596 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
25599 Sunset Industrial Parts 136.97 Mechanical Supplies
25600 SARBS-CWEA 20.00 Membership
25601 Teledyne Analytical 164.56 Instrument Parts
2SW2 The Foxboro Company 112.23 Instrument Supplies
25603 The Meniweed Corporation 2,590.39 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
25604 The Orange County Register 880.20 Notices&Ads
25605 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 286.49 Mechanical Supplies
25606 Daily Pilot 112.50 Notices&Ads
25607 Trade Service Corporation 2,058.15 Software Maint.
25608 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,024.65 Truck Supplies
25609 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 110.00 Lab Services
26610 Teksystems 2,400.00 Temporary Employment Services
25611 United Parcel Service 286.74 Parcel Services
25612 Unocal Corporation 48.36 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
25613 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.545.56 Plumbing Supplies
25614 Vector Resources 4,413.18 Voica/Data Communication Services
25615 Veme's Plumbing 635.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair
25616 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,312.62 Vision Service Premium
25817 Vortex Corp. 213.66 Door Repair
25618 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,268.90 Lab Supplies
25619 Weigh-Tronix, Inc. 732.66 Scale Repair
25620 Western States Chemical,Inc. 17,604.88 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
25621 Wesbux International 325.11 Truck Supplies
25622 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 872.78 Instrument Supplies
25623 Witeg Scientific 1,60.42 Lab Supplies
25624 WCT Products, Inc. 586.68 Instrument Supplies
Page 5 of 13 e
Claims Paid From 2/18/00 to 2129/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25625 WS Atkins Water 19,500.00 Biosolids Testing Agreement
25626 Xerox Corporation 6,463.17 Copier Leases
25627 Xpedex Paper 8 Graphics 106.61 Office Supplies
25628 Yokogawa Corp.of America 191.93 Instrument Supplies
25629 CNA Trust 1,918.80 Construction 541-1
25630 Union Bank of California 3.083.19 Construction 3.38-1
25631 Codna Chaudhry and Best Buy 2,362.20 Employee Computer Loan Program
25632 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 195.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
25633 Darrell Ennis and MASS Microsystems, Inc. 2,398.68 Employee Computer Loan Program
25834 Emilio Arislon and Circuit City 2,589.28 Employee Computer Loan Program
25635 Orange County Sanitation District 219.76 Petty Cash Reimb.
25636 Mahin Talebi 1,216.54 Employee Computer Loan Program
25637 Orange County Sanitation District 408,375.15 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
25638 Southern California Edison 46,422.21 Power
25639 South Coast AGMD 18,054.32 Emissions Fee-Plant No.2
25640 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 148.20 Instrument Supplies
25641 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines-Catalytic Converters
25642 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 23.79 Telephone Service
25643 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
25644 Court Order 200.00 Wage Gamishment
25645 Cleugh's Rhubarb 2.536.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25648 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
25647 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 10,286.27 Computer Maint.Agreement
2584E Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 128.28 Electrical Supplies
25649 CHMIA 30.00 Registration
25M CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership
26651 Cade D.Dillon 350.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
25652 DWG Associates 500.00 Professional Services-Plant Automation Project
25653 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
25654 Chris Krietxil/Fashion Fair Laundry 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25655 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,921.25 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
25656 Thomas M. Flanagan 248.74 Meeting/1-raining Expense Reimb.
25657 Fluke Electronics Corporation 628.00 Electrical Supplies
25658 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment
25659 GTE California 1,000.38 Telephone Services
25660 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction
25661 Irvine Ranch Water District 53.22 Water Use
25662 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 13,506.76 Safety Supplies
25663 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 512.34 Safety Supplies
25664 Gregory R.Mathews 522.38 Meeting Expense Reimb.
25665 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.599.48 Tools
266W Monster.Com 275.00 Notices 8 Ads
Page 6 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25667 Multiquip 139.10 Pump Supplies
25668 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1,014.00 Training Registration
25669 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12.69 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
25670 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.19 Electrical Parts&Supplies
25671 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
25672 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
25673 Oxygen Service Company 254.90 Specialty Gases
25674 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction
25675 Pacific Bell 1,119.32 Telephone Services
25676 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
25677 Parkhouse Tire Co. 665.59 Tires
25678 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
25679 Peace Officers Council of CA 765.00 Dues Deduction
25680 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 43.31 Mechanical Supplies
25681 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 692.39 Tools
25682 Sheraton Newport Beach 12,000.00 Hunt.Bch. Issue Meeting Expense
25683 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 208.16 Tools/Hardware
25684 South Coast AQMD 12,012.71 Emissions Fee-Plant No. 1
25685 State of California 141.09 Wage Garnishment
25686 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions
25687 University of Washington 525.00 Training Registration
25688 Water Education Foundation 115.00 Membership
25689 Donald F.McIntyre 679.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25690 Michael D.Moore 180.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25691 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 105.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
25692 RPI/Bio Gro 154,959.97 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
25693 Brown&Caldwell 437,417.60 Engineering Service P1-37
25694 Carollo Engineers 26,895.76 Engineering Service J-39
25695 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 193,661.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
25M Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 72,23625 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99
25697 Orange County Water District 30,925.92 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
25698 Pacific Investment Management Co. 111,011.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97
25699 Painewebber Incorporated 69,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement
25700 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 246,299.33 Engineering Services J-42
25701 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 390,548.74 Residuals Removal MO 329-95
25702 Projects Partners 31,692.10 Temporary Employment Services
25703 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 34,701.30 Contract Services-Sewer Cleaning
25704 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72.958.61 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
25705 SPEC Services,Inc. 76,602.66 Engineering Services J-33-1
25706 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 59,539.89 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
25707 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 81,106.91 Legal Services MO 7-26-96
25708 Bernard Construction Company, Inc. 1,248,300.00 Construction 3-35R&3.11R
Page 7 of 13 -
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on
25709 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 416,981.72 Construction 3-38-1
25710 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 28,347.05 Construction P2-65
25711 Union Bank of California 46.331.30 Construction 3-38-1
25712 Union Bank of California 138,700.00 Construction 3-35
25713 Union Bank of California 121,546.07 Construction P1-46-2&J-53
25714 Adamson Indusbies 1,753.31 Lab Supplies
25715 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 4,235.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
25716 Aearo Company 452.00 Safety Supplies
25717 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 330.80 Lab Supplies
25718 Air Cold Supply 70.16 Air Conditioner Repairs
25719 Air Products 8 Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies
2572D Airbome Express 117.00 Air Freight
25721 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 865.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
25722 Appleone Employment Service 11,054.97 Temporary Employment Services
25M Applied Industrial Technology 1,478.69 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies
25724 Arcus Data Security 166.80 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage
25725 Asbury Environmental Services 82.50 Waste Oil Removal
25726 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 24.24 Plaques
25727 Voided Check - -
25728 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 380.99 Telephone Service
25729 American Telephone d Telegraph Corp. 183.01 Telephone Service
25730 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,152.28 Long Distance Telephone Service
25731 AT 8 T Wireless Services 4,140.36 Cellular Telephone Service
25732 Bailey, Fisher&Porter 432.21 Electrical Supplies
25733 Battery Specialties 145.46 Batteries
25734 Bentley Systems, Inc. 5,387.50 Software Maintenance Agreement
25736 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,566.96 Engineering Services 3-38-1 8 6-13
25736 Bureau Of Business Practice 158.95 Publication
25737 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7.276.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
26738 BNI Building News 109.43 Publication
25739 C&H Distributions,Inc. 233.10 Tool Cabinet
25740 Cal-Glass,Inc. 140.08 Lab Equipment Service
25741 Calif Centrifugal Pump 7,376.21 Pump Supplies
25742 Southern California Marine Institute 7,245-00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
25743 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,568.61 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene
25744 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 16.16 Office Supplies
25745 Compressor Components Of California 14.546.25 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies
25746 Compu Master 895.00 Registration
25747 Computers America,Inc. 272.79 Computer Supplies
25748 Connell GM Parts 245.67 Truck Supplies
25749 Consolidated Elect. Distrbutors.Inc. 1,576.31 Elechical Supplies
25750 Consolidated Freighlways 602.15 Freight
Page 8 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25761 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 748.71 Plumbing Supplies
26752 Controloo 177.62 Electrical Supplies
25753 Converse Consultants 5,274.48 Consulting Services-P2-60 8 J-33-1
25764 Cooper Energy Services 9,378.46 Engine Supplies
25765 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat
25756 Corporate Express 356.49 Office Supplies
25757 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
25758 Cost Containment Solutions 2.867.20 Worker's Comp.Services
25759 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 405.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
26760 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 70.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee
25761 Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc. 11,928.16 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
25762 CA Emissions Program 17.70 Emissions Testing Program
25763 CASA 250.00 Conference Registration
25764 CEPA Company 616.25 Lab Equipment Maint.Service
25765 CHEMetrics,Inc. 94.17 Lab Supplies
25766 CH2MHill 4,806.75 Engineering Services-Microfiltration Demonstration Project
25767 CR&R,Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals
25768 CWEA Annual Conference 1,945.00 Conference Registration
257W CWEA Membership 150.00 Membership
25770 David's Tree Service 150.00 Tree Maint.Service
25771 Del Mar Analytical 685.00 Biosolids Analysis
25772 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 165.76 Lab Supplies
25773 Diamond H Recognition 42.79 Employee Service Awards
25774 Dunn-Edwarda Corporation 362.88 Paint Supplies
25775 DDB Engineering, Inc. 22,228.00 Temporary Employment Services
25776 DGA Consultants, Inc. 2,808.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
25777 Electra-Bond 2,200.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25778 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
25779 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 11,849.62 Consulting Services-FIS Support
25780 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 943.70 Lab Supplies
25781 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 8,864.78 Professional Services J-40-4
25782 Equipment Life Technology 287.64 Mechanical Supplies
25783 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,013.27 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
25784 Faxpress, Inc. 3.313.27 Office Supplies
25785 FBdEx Corporation 74.15 Air Freight
25786 Fitter Supply Company 808.92 Filters
25787 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.26 Orange County Property Information Subscription
25788 First Metro Appraisals 1,875.00 Sakioka Easement Appraisal
25789 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 601.05 Lab Supplies
25790 Flo-Systems, Inc. 14,324.65 Pump Supplies
25791 Fountain Valley Camera 51.36 Photo Supplies
25792 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 242.00 Truck Wash Tickets
Page 9 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116/00 to 2129I00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on
25793 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 1,629.49 Paint Supplies
25794 Fred Pryor Seminars 89.00 Training Registration
25795 Fry's Electronics 1,180.25 Computer Supplies
25796 General Electric Supply Company 5,487.17 Electric Parts
25797 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.656.48 Lumber/Hardware
25798 Callan Associates,Inc. 1,440.08 Investment Advisor Service
25799 Gates Fiberglass Installers 3,564.82 Fiberglass Repair
25800 GTE California 93.58 Telephone Services
25801 George Yardley Go. 515.63 Lab Supplies
25802 Gibson,Dunn 8 Crutcher,L.L.P. 7,260.00 Legal Services -Burge Claim
25803 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 23,526.36 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
25804 Goveming 15.00 Publication
25805 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership
25806 WW Grainger, Inc. 3.630.72 Compressor Supplies
25807 Graseby S.T.I. 785.44 Engine Supplies
25808 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1.181.75 Janitorial Supplies
25809 GBC(General Binding Corp) 633.03 Printing Service
25810 Edwards Systems Technology 2,125.00 Safety Service Agrement
25811 Harold Primrose Ice 112.00 Ice For Samples
25812 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 908.99 Plumbing Supplies
25813 Heiman Fire Equipment,Inc. 6.132.03 Safety Equipment
25814 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 673.08 Catering Services
26815 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 1.020.76 Compressor Parts
25816 Home Depot 857.21 Small Hardware
25817 Hopkins Technical Products 421.06 Pump Supplies
25818 Hub Auto Supply 301.69 Tmdc Parts
25819 City of Huntington Beach 14,451.57 Water Use
25820 Hunts Final Phase 3,636.83 Misc.Construction Services-Admin. Bldg.Acoustic Modifn.
25821 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,163.70 Printing Service
25822 Industrial Air Compressor 2,590.83 Air Compressor
26823 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 915.74 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
26824 StateNet 200.00 Online Service
26825 Interim Personnel 688.15 Temporary Employment Service
25826 Interstate Battery Systems 242.17 Batteries
25827 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.13 Photographic Services
25828 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
25829 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 171.40 Safety Supplies
25830 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 734.10 Instrument Supplies
25831 Jays Catering 1,766.28 Catering Services
26832 Jlm's Suspension Service 35.00 Truck Repairs
25833 Johnstone Supply 463.26 Electrical Supplies
25834 JLM Contracting 259.73 Construction Service-Pipe Repair
Page 10 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25835 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 4,290.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
25836 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 0,437.50 PIS Support Services
26837 Knox 7.873.96 Tools
25838 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 79.61 Safety Supplies
25839 Lab Support 2,522.62 Temporary Employment Services
25840 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 6,112.52 Engineering Service-Plant No. 1 Dust Collection System
25841 Lexis-Nexis 6.27 Books 8 Publications
25842 Llebert Cassidy 1,695.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
25843 Gerald R.Jones 4.487.95 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
25844 Luccl's 100.00 Meeting Expense
25845 Maintenance Products,Inc. 3,058.87 Mechanical Supplies
25846 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 212.56 Tools
25847 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 1,020.66 Boxes
25848 Mee Analytical System 750.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
25849 Medlin Controls Co. 000.39 Instrument Supplies
25850 Mesa Muffler 280.12 Truck Supplies
25851 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 3,737.71 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
26852 Miller Equipment Co. 574.99 Pump Repair
25853 Mission Uniform Service 3,697.31 Uniform Rentals
25854 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 188.67 Publications
25855 Monarch Instrument 11,335.91 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
25856 Monitor Labs,Inc. 978.93 Instrument Maint.
25857 Monterey Mechanical Co. 10.00 Mailing Fee Refund
25858 Moody's Investo/s Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
25859 Neel Supply Co. 385.26 Plumbing Supplies
25860 New Pig 1.225.94 Spill Absorbent Materials
25861 City of Newport Beach 65.35 Water Use
25862 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 13,128.17 LubrlwnUDiesel Fuel
25803 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 9.028.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
25864 NAS Associates,Inc. 1.597.35 Lab Services
25865 Northwestern Carbon 2,761.87 Filters
25866 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 516.00 Lab Services
26867 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.736.80 Office Supplies
25868 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 1,129.45 Grease Pump
26869 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 159.18 Plumbing Supplies
25870 Orange County Forum 35.00 Registration
25871 Orange County Sanitation District 90.00 Petty Cash Reimb.
25872 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1.339.07 Fittings
25873 Oxygen Service Company 1,887.80 Specialty Gases
25874 OCB Reprographics 4,953.78 Printing Service-Spec P-173
25875 Pacific Bell 34.52 Telephone Services
25876 Pacl6c Mechanical Supply 1,765.82 Plumbing Supplies
Page 11 of 13 -.
Claims Paid From 2116/00 to 2/29/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25877 Pagenet 2,195.03 Paging Services
25878 Palmieri,Tyler,Wiener,Wilhelm&Waldron 546.00 Legal Service-Sakloka Easement, Contract 7-1E
25879 Parts Unlimited 725.45 Truck Supplies
26880 Patriot Video Productions 390.83 Video Taping Services
25881 Polydyne, Inc. 12,923.20 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
25882 Power Design 3.356.41 Electrical Supplies
26883 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin.
25884 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 437.54 Mechanical Supplies
25885 Pump Engineering Wor 0-Air 1,988.45 Pump Supplies
25886 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
25887 Red Wing Shoes 164.84 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
25888 R.A.Reed Electric 5,339.41 Motor Overhaul
25889 Rick Arbour 8 Associates 3.108.43 Consulting Service-0 8 M Worker Competency 8 Training Project
25890 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 568.52 Auto Repair
25891 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 995.00 Engineering Service-Laboratory Seismic Evaluation
25892 RPM Electric Motors 4,908.01 Reliance Motor 8 Pump
25893 RIPS Industries 1,148.97 Electrical Supplies
25894 Safety-Kleen 5,526.60 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste
25895 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 4.22 Mechanical Supplies
25896 Schwing America, Inc. 1,262.00 Pump Supplies
25897 Scott Specialty Genes, Inc. 123.54 Specialty Gases
25898 Second-Sun 851.55 Light Fixtures
26899 Shureluck Sales 6 Engineering 1,522.25 Tools/Hardware
25900 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
25901 Sievers Instruments 450.00 Lab Supplies
25902 Solder Station One Inc.-West 474.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
25903 South Coast Environmental Co. 7,609.17 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
25904 Southern California Edison 16.10 Power
26905 Southern California Water 67.49 Water Use
25906 Sparklets 1,863.78 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
25907 Standard&PWeS 1.000.00 Analytical Services
25908 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton, L.P. 635.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
25909 Successodes,Inc. 341.44 Pictures for New Plant 2 Maint. Bldg.
25910 Summit Steel 379.46 Metal
25911 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
25912 Sunset Ford 385.84 Truck Supplies
25913 SARBS-PDC 2,000.00 Training Registration
25914 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1.079.91 Electric Cart Parts
25915 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 284.90 Publication
25916 Teledyne Analytical 75.00 Instrument Parts
25917 The Foxboro Company 1,733.72 Instrument Supplies
25918 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3.741.12 Mechanical Suppfes
Page 12 of 13
Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2/29100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
25919 Time Motion Tools 57.03 Tools
25920 Transcat 751.95 Electrical Supplies
25921 Track&Auto Supply,Inc. 329.44 Truck Supplies
25922 Teksyslems 4,180.30 Temporary Employment Services
25923 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement
25924 Ultra Scientific 130.94 Lab Supplies
25925 Undersea Graphics Inc. 19,250.00 Contract Service-Oudall Inspection
25926 United Parcel Service 629.82 Parcel Services
25927 V&A Consulting Engineers 10,372.90 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection
25928 Valley Cities Supply Company 10.99 Plumbing Supplies
25929 Verve's Plumbing 290.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair
25930 Vortex Industries, Inc. 104.00 Door Repair
25931 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.963.89 Lab Supplies
25932 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,277.37 Security Guards
25933 West-Lde Supply Company, Inc. 236.03 Electrical Supplies
25934 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 1809.89 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
25935 Xerox Corporation 15,213.71 Copier Leases
25938 Matthew And Stewart Co., Inc. 8.813.00 Construction 11-23
25937 Systems Integrated 16.410.40 Construction Services J-31-3
25938 American Management Association 169.00 Registration
25939 Terri L.Josway 102.36 Office Supplies Reimb.
25940 Donald F.McIntyre 100.77 Cellular Expense Reimb.
25941 Robert Oaten 524.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25942 George L.Robertson 184.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25943 Gary G.Streed 485.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
25944 Ernest N.Yeboah 819.17 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb.
25945 Albert E. Simpson&Willow Data Systems 1,895.11 Employee Computer Loan Program
25946 Albert E.Simpson&Micro Center 330.31 Employee Computer Loan Program
25947 Orange County Sanitation District 352.68 Petty Cash Reimb.
25948 Thomas E.Gaworski&MASS Microsystems 2,714.33 Employee Computer Loan Program
25949 Wanda Hagerty&Gateway, Inc. 2.989.74 Employee Computer Loan Program
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,770,474.19
Payroll Disbursements
18287-18411 Employee Paychecks $ 162.852.07 Biweekly Payroll 2/23100
46524-46968 Direct Deposit Statements 677,214.47 Biweekly Payroll 2/23100
Total Payroll Disbursements $ $40,086.54
Total Claims Paid 2116/00-2129100 $ 8,616,540.73
Page 13 of 13 -.
" BOARD OF DIRECTORS Maanny Data To Bd.OIO r.
o�zyao
AGENDA REPORT ��"umw to- w
9ra1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES: "PHYSICAL
DISABILITY" DISCRIMINATION, NORMAN PARSONS V. ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages: "Physical Disability'
Discrimination, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, (Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 811565), and authorize General Counsel to appear and
defend the interests of the District.
SUMMARY
On March 6, 2000, Mr. Norman Parsons served the District with a Complaint for
Injunctive Relief and Damages: "Physical Disability" Discrimination. This Complaint
alleges discrimination due to physical disability. Please see attached memo from
General Counsel dated March 9, 2000.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memo from General Counsel dated March 9, 2000
GGS:SK:BG
H M9 EYVpM+llau,a.Apn flpvb�9a,U�pMPKUY`�OAm W")Ox
Rwa�J. YIOW
w
V
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, February 23, 2000
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, February 23, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Peer Swan,Vice Chair Don Hughes
Pat McGuigan, Chairman,OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Director Brian Donahue
Jim Silva, County Supervisor
STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Absent: Don McIntyre, General Manager
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Lisa Tomko,Acting Director of Human
Resources
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the January 26, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2
February 23, 2000 tir
v
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Debay welcomed Director Brian Donahue to the meeting as her guest.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there was a spill Monday afternoon in the Buena
Park/La Mirada area when a sewer line surcharged. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services,
said that the Regional Board has been notified and a written report is due by Friday. It is estimated
that about 10,000 gallons may have flowed into the stone drain,which ultimately emptied into the
ocean via the San Gabriel River. The OC Health Care Agency has closed the beach in the area of
the mouth of the river, citing a sewage spill.
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee members on the problems with
the valve and spring assemblies during the rebuilding of the central power generation engines.
Additional investigation is being done, including destructive testing, to help identify and quantify the
cause.
A discussion followed on various issues related to treating and permitting Urban Runoff. Staff
continues to meet with developers regarding terns and conditions for dry weather urban runoff
permits. A memo (copy attached to minutes)dated February 23, 2000 was reviewed. The
Committee directed staff to pursue Option 2: to accelerate efforts to study the hydraulic and quality
impacts of accepting dry weather urban runoff and to provide a recommendation to the Board on the
long-term policy decision regarding the acceptance of dry weather urban runoff in April. Each
request will be considered separately to evaluate the potential impact on permit limits. The OMITS
will oversee the policy development before sending to the Board in April. The other committees will
be informed also.
Director Swan suggested getting more pro active with the legislature to allow the treatment of urban
runoff without penalty and avoid mandates.
Mr. Ghirelli discussed the expert panel that will be convening February 28, 29 and March 1 to review
the steps taken during the July 1999 beach closure. USC representatives will prepare a written
summary of the deliberations and recommendations.
Mr. Ghirelli reported that the wet weather has caused problems with biosolids disposal. Wet weather
rates are in farce. Fewer loads are being trucked offsite, and more is being temporarily stored onsite.
Lisa Tomko,Acting Director of Human Resources, provided the members with a brief history of the
Step 5 Grievance on the Board agenda and stressed that it is not a disciplinary issue.
Mr. McIntyre reported on a meeting he attended at the County on septic tank removals. The County
is considering the removal of septic systems as part of the elimination of County islands. A good
estimate is that there are about 3000 properties on septic in the County. The Health Care Agency
will be contacted to see if they are to become involved in this issue. It is expected that Director Lynn
Daucher from Brea will address the Steering Committee on this issue in either March or April. A
written report will be provided before the next Steering Committee meeting. The members expressed
concern about the fairness of providing relief to homeowners for future connections.
W
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
February 23,2000
(n REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel reported that he will be briefing the Board members at tonight's meeting closed
session on Crow Winthrop and also the resolution reached regarding the sale of the Sakioka property
easement.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C)
A. Proposed March 25 Directors Workshop on GWR Project. The District's
representatives on the GWR Joint Coordinating Committee have expressed some
concern that some of the new Board members aren't very familiar with the project and
could have questions on the issues. A workshop will be held on Saturday, March 25
between 8 and 11 to discuss the status of the project,what problems are anticipated,
and what changes are being considered.
In a related discussion, Director Swan suggested a workshop to discuss the
consolidation of rates. It was decided that this would be a special discussion item at a
future FAHR Committee meeting.
B. Policy Decisions re Dry Weather Urban Runoff Issues. See discussion under Report of
General Manager.
C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in
March were reviewed.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY
Chair Debay asked that Russell Patterson be invited to the April Steering Committee meeting,
followed by Steve Anderson in May. Jim Ferryman will be attending the March meeting.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
Director Swan asked that staff begin planning for a Directors Workshop to help educate the Board
members on Impending financing Issues and Issuance of debt.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 22. 2000 at 5 p.m.
W
Minutes of the Steering Committee ;
Page 4
February 23,2000
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for March 22, 2000 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no dosed session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m.
bmitted by:
g µ
e h Tappan
(!"ring Committee Secretary
"I. .,WIS dqM 141 mIbebV✓MWbt1A0lYWi0a
r
r'
Draft
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1, 2000— 5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on March 1, 2000, in the Districts Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Peter Green Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Anna Piercy Barbara Collins, Senior Financial Analyst
Charles E. Sylvia Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
Kenneth Blake
Directors Absent: Others Present:
Joy Neugebauer
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the December 1, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed.
Alternate Director Kenneth Blake abstained.
S
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2 ^
March 1, 2000
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair gave no report
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reminded the Directors of the Groundwater Replenishment System
Workshop to be held jointly with the Orange County Water District on Saturday, March 25 from
8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
Director Jan Debay suggested that because of potential director turnover the end of this year
that alternate directors also be invited to attend this workshop.
Blake Anderson outlined the various reasons for holding this workshop and the decisions that
would need to be made in January of next year of whether to continue with the project.
Mr. McIntyre also advised the Directors of an article that should appear in the Register on the
following day regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System by Gary Robbins.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, reported he was in Washington, D.C. and met
with the Orange County Delegation to discuss water quality issues. This is the third year
Orange County Sanitation District has been invited to attend this forum. Others included the
Orange County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County, and MWD.
Issues discussed were Cal-fed and delta water issues, GWRS funding, California's allocation of
the Colorado River, water quality issues, biosolids for agricultural application, groundwater
replenishment and dairy issues.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Patrick Miles gave no report.
(9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Bob Ooten indicated there had been limited extra flow due to the recent rains. Peak flows have
averaged approximately 300 mgd. The capacity of our outfall is 480 mgd. However, the rain
has affected some of the biosolids haulers' sites for solids. Because of that the solids have had
to be hauled to wet weather sites at a much higher premium cost.
Mr. Ooten discussed AQMD Rule 1191 regarding various altemative fuel vehicles. AQMD is
changing the original intent of that rule but it has not been released yet. This will mean that we
will not be forced to purchase only alternative fuel vehicles for all of our applications. We had
informed AQMD that alternative fuel vehicles are not available in all of the size Gasses of trucks
we use.
The central generation engines are in the process of being overhauled. One of the engines
sustained considerable damage when, a few days after being returned to service, an exhaust
valve spring broke and the valve fell into the cylinder. The piston battered itself, the cylinder,
1
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
All Page 3
March 1,2000
the head, and the valve, damaging all four. It will cost approximately$200,000 to repair the
engine. A study is currently underway to determine who is liable for the repair costs.
Directors asked questions regarding the AOMD ruling and the use of alternative fuel vehicles.
Mr. Dolan indicated they would be doing additional research into electrical vehicles.
(10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Mr. Ghirelli reported that the dry weather urban runoff diversion policy issues will be brought to
the OMTS Committee in April. Policies need to be adopted that provide for long-term permits.
Two permit requests currently under review are for Hearthside Homes and The Irvine Company.
Permits will need to be in place before the Coastal Commission will grant these companies
approval to build on the development sites.
An expert panel of 10 scientists just concluded a three-day session reviewing the efforts
regarding the Huntington Beach bacteria closure last summer. Mr. Ghirelli reviewed the key
points of their review. The District was commended for its extensive efforts in trying to
determine the source of bacteria; the frequency and level of monitoring the water; and had set a
very high standard of expectation for others, as well as the District, to follow in the future.
The panel also thought that: the District should not have been the lead agency; the District
should have begun to look toward urban runoff testing earlier on in the process; early testing
should have been completed to determine If the problem was human or animal bacteria; and
other water sources, such as the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh, should have been tested
sooner.
Blake Anderson also advised that currently there is no sufficient contingency plan in place to
avoid what happened last year from reoccurring again this summer. Lead responsibility has not
been decided between the County, the City, the District, and others. Discussion among
Directors concluded the only thing that could be planned would be to try and gather funds from
other agencies involved to do additional source testing. It was also suggested that possibly dry
weather run-off from the Santa Ana River could be captured and sent to the treatment plant for
treatment Staff is evaluating the technical issues that may impact the District if dry weather
urban runoff continues to divert to our system.
Mr. Anderson also stated that while meeting with the Orange County Delegation in Washington,
D.C., Assemblyman Rohrbacher indicated an interest in sponsoring a bill to protect the coast.
However, there is only a two-week period to get the bill written and submitted in time for
consideration.
Mr. Ghirelli then briefly updated the directors on the Central Valley biosolids issues including
progress on acquiring Tule Ranch in Kings County and the composting services by the Yakima
Company.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4 V
March 1, 2000
(12) ACTION ITEMS (Items)
a. OMTSOO-01: Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the biosolids management
contracts with Pima Gro, Bio Gro,Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company,
into one account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as
deemed necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations
and contractor performance.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
(13) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-b)
a. OMTS00-02 Biosolids Management Quarterly Report
Bob Ghirelli gave a brief update on the District's biosolids. He also
reported that the District is one of three hundred participants in a blind
study of the radioactive quality of biosolids. It was noted that previous
tests have shown radioactivity levels are very low in the District's effluent
and biosolids.
b. OMTSOO-03 Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study Report
Mark Esquer updated the Directors on the benchmarking study the
District has been involved with. The Directors commended Mark on the
achievements and the quality of the benchmarking. Blake Anderson also
commended Barbara Collins for her extensive work and coordination in
bringing all of the data together to move this project along.
Director Debay suggested that this presentation should be utilized at the
next CASA meeting.
(14) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
Director Swan requested a report on the needs of the Operations Department for groundwater
replenishment system overflow, as well as what other agencies are going on fuel cell
technology.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
March 1, 2000
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
April 5, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Submi ed by:
Penny Kyl
Operations, Ma' enance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
H:\wp.dta�penda\OMT5\2000VAInutm\030100 Mlnul e.dm
OMTSCOMMITTEE MxGngDate ToBd.&Dir.
3/1/2000 312212000
AGENDA REPORT nemNumEe ItrmNum
oM 0 01 / /e
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli D.Env, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager,
Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist
SUBJECT: Biosolids Management Budget Consolidation
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the District's four biosolids management contracts
with Pima Gro, Bio Gro, Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one account; and
2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed necessary, due to unanticipated
changes in climate, regulations, and contractor performance.
SUMMARY
The District currently contracts with four biosolids management contractors (Pima Gro, Bio
Gro, Tule Ranch, and the Yakima Company) to land apply biosolids in Kings, Kern,
Riverside, and San Diego counties. At the time these contracts were entered, there was a
surplus of permitted land for biosolids land application in the region. Several biosolids
management companies competed to manage the material. Individual funding for each
biosolids management contractor was approved by the Board of Directors at their August
and November 1999 Board meetings.
With an ever-changing regulatory framework affecting biosolids management, long-range
planning continues to be a challenge for the District and our biosolids management
contractors. The State Water Resources Control Board has taken the lead in developing a
general order for the land application of biosolids. Unfortunately this proposed rule does not
preempt the development of local or county biosolids regulations. A number of counties
have developed, or are in the process of developing their own ordinances related to
biosolids management. These range from those counties that incorporate federal standards
(Part 503) and impose few additional siting requirements (e.g., Riverside County), to ones
that allow only Class A biosolids (e.g., Tulare County), to bans on applications in
unincorporated areas (e.g., the proposed final Kern County Ordinance), to complete bans
(e.g., San Joaquin County).
These changes in regulations, along with regional climatic concerns, and contractor
performance, have resulted in frequent adjustments to biosolids allocations between the
biosolids management contractors. Changes in load allocations have resulted in numerous
change orders having to be made by staff during the past year to transfer funds between
contractors' accounts. Staffs request for specific amounts for each contractor is a best
estimate of the anticipated service required from each contractor at the time of entering the
contracts. Many, if not all, of the factors that cause a change in the allocation of loads were
difficult to anticipate at the time that the Board approved the individual biosolids
management contract funding.
X R�M
RwaM. ermve Page 1
At the August 1999 Board of Directors meeting, the Board authorized staff to:
• Amend the Districts contract with Pima Gro Systems, Inc., (contract period from
06/30/00 through 06130101) with two additional one-year extensions and increasing the
costs per ton of biosolids managed from $21.92 to $25.90 for fair weather management,
and $33.70 for inclement weather management for an annual amount not to exceed
$1,993,000; and,
• Amend the District's contract with Bio Gro (contract period from 04/26/00 to 06/30/02) by
increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from $21.45 to$25.45 for fair weather
management and from $29.00 to $36.00 for inclement weather management, for an
annual amount not to exceed $1,775,000.
At the November 1999 Board of Directors meeting, the Board authorized staff to:
• Amend the District's contract with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a portion of the
District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years (contract period 01/10/00 through
01/10/03) for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per
wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an
annual amount not to exceed $2,540,000; and,
• Enter into a contract with the Yakima Company (contract period 01/10/00 through
01/10110) to land apply a portion of the District's biosolids at$25.00 per wet ton, plus
Kern County regulatory compliance fees, during the compost site permitting and
development period for an annual amount not to exceed $775,000.
Staff is requesting that the funds approved by the Board at their August and November
1999 Board meetings for individual biosolids management contractors be placed into one
account to be used for payment of all four biosolids management contractors in order to
avoid having to create frequent budget change orders. This biosolids holding account
would contain $7,083,000 (the sum of the four management contracts).
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A
ALTERNATIVES NIA
H My.WvpentlalOMlSF4TApenOa Ra{vR510Mi5901 M
R.,�e. arxi9e Page 2
CEQA FINDINGS N/A
ATTACHMENTS N/A
H4 .dh�MTgMWAVn RephWMI99U1.6Y
Page 3
Rn�aG erm'ae
\ I
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, March 2, 2000, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design,and Construction Committee of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 2, 1999,at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative
Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Guy Carrozzo Bob Doter, Director of Operations &
Gerald Sigler Maintenance
Russell Patterson Doug Stewart,Engineering Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
John Linder, Construction Manager
Directors Absent: Chuck W insor, Engineering Supervisor
Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Christina Shea Jim Burror,Contract Project Manager
Lynn Daucher William Cassidy, Project Manager
Brian Donahue,Vice Chair Terri Josway, Safety Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Doug Cook,Operations Manager
Mark Esquer, Process Support Manager
Steve Kozak, Risk Manager
Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary
OTHERS PRESENT:
Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
PDC Committee Minutes V
Page 2
March 2, 2000
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the February 3, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the proceedings of the Expert Panel that reviewed
the actions during last summer's beach closure. A written report will be forthcoming. The main
criticism from the Panel was that too much time was spent on looking for a break in the sewer
line. They also raised the question on whether the District should be the lead agency in these
situations. Several suggestions were offered on how to better handle similar events in the
future.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager did not make a report.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, asked John Linder to provide the Committee members with a
heads up on Contract 3-35R,a $7.7 million manholes and pipeline system repair and rehabilitation
project that runs from Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley through Westminster, Garden Grove, Stanton,
Anaheim and ends in Fullerton. Negotiations will begin with the contractor for an equitable
adjustment to the contract as a result of stopping the remaining work on the pipeline repairs. The
pipeline is in much worse condition than anticipated and the repairs are much more extensive and
would increase the price of the contract significantly. Staff will reevaluate and redesign the pipeline
repairs and prepare the work as a separate contract. The manhole rehabilitation portion of the
contract will be completed.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and
the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. There were two
Change Orders that required PDC Committee approval.
V PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
March 2, 2000
(11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT
There were no PSAs or Addenda approved by the General Manager from January 27 through
February 23, 2000.
(12) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT
Information only item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Facilities Engineering Consultant
Activity Report.
(13) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT
Jim Herberg presented the monthly progress report. The project is in the preliminary engineering
phase. Twenty of the 32 design memoranda are in progress. The Joint Coordinating Committee will
be reviewing the information as the project develops. The project is on schedule and on budget. A
health risk assessment is underway to compare the quality of the reclaimed water with MWD water.
This should be completed in July 2000.The Title 22 Engineers Report should be complete in June.
The US Bureau of Reclamation has allocated $20 million for the project in its budget, of which $1.5
million is included in this year's funding. EPA is considering a grant request for$500.000,with a
decision due next month. Proposition 13 includes $38 million for the GWRS project. Both agencies'
boards have adopted the Final EIR and the Bureau of Reclamation in May should finalize the EIS
Record of Determination. The Ocean Discharge Brine Study will be done to accurately show the
effects of reduced flow and higher mineral concentrations on outfall dispersion.
General Manager Don McIntyre mentioned that the makeup of the Joint Coordinating Committee may
be changed to appoint alternate Directors to each of the Committee members, rather than having the
General Manager of each agency sit as alternate to the three Directors. The alternates will be
encouraged to attend the meetings.
ACTION ITEMS (Items a-i)
a. PDC00-14 Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue
Sewer Replacement, Contract No.7-28, with Haden Grbavac
Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$19,957,
increasing the total contract amount to$211,561; (2) Ratify
Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing
the total contract amount to the final contract amount of$204,016;
and (3)Accept RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 7-28,as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final
Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
PDC Committee Minutes V
Page 4
March 2, 2000
b. PDC00-15 Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Standby Power and Reliability
Improvements, Job No. J-33-1,with Southern Contracting
Company, authorizing an addition of$106,492 and 10 calendar
days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,442,996.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve.
C. PDC00-16 Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the
development for a Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program,Job
No. J-73-2.
Jim Herberg reported that this project is a part of implementing
recommendations from the Strategic Plan requiring action on
reducing rainfall inflow and infiltration into the collection system.
Most inflow is from small lines in local sewer systems. In the
1998-monitoring program, 60 sites were monitored in dry and wet
weather. Several of the 'hot spots'identified through that program
are now being corrected. The Cooperative Projects Program is
one vehicle that can assist the cities in correcting problems that
may be identified in the long-term sewer-monitoring program. The
monitoring program will prioritize cooperative projects, replace
planned monitoring and also result in better mapping of the
collective system.
Director Swan expressed concern about working on the whole
collection system at one time. He suggested identifying the
problems and making corrections section by section, completing
one trunkline system before proceeding to the next. _
MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried (5-1 with
Director Swan opposed)to recommend approval.
d. PDCOO-17 (1) Establish a Budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point
Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000;
(2)Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Rocky Point
Pump Station,Contract No. 5-50,for a total budget of$4,124,000;
(3)Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14'Street
Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total budget of$2.210,000;
(4)Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the W Street Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total budget of$2,248,000;
(5)Approve a budget amendment of($12,061,000)for
Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump
Stations, Contract No. 2-37,for a total budget of$14,284,200; and
(6)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro, Inc.
to provide engineering services for the design and construction
support for Contract Nos. 5.49, 5.50, 5-51, and 5-52 for an amount
not to exceed $1,149,801.
y PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
March 2, 2000
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
e. PDC00-18 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting
Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction
documents for the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor
Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not
to exceed $175,261.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
f. PDC00-19 Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting
Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction
documents for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed $224,800.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
g. PDC00-20 Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting
Engineers to provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill
Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk
Improvements, Contract No.7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk
Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41,for a total amount not to
exceed $811,958.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
h. PDC00-21 Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering corporation,for Armstrong Subtrunk
Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, providing for additional engineering
services,for an additional amount of$40,358, increasing the total
amount not to exceed to$170,680.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly caned to approve.
i. PDC00-02 Direct Staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station
Annex to replace the Foster Pump Station.
Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor, provided additional
information requested by the Committee at the February meeting,
and clarified staffs recommendation. The existing function of the
Foster Pump Station was explained, and limitations were detailed.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 6
March 2, 2000
(15) INFORMATION ITEM (a)
a. PDC00-22 Receive and file a status report on Interim Administrative Control
Plan for Hazardous Location Classification Project, Job No. J-35.
Terri Josway, Safety Manager, reported that the highest hazardous
areas have been identified. Procedures and training will be
provided for staff and consultants working on site. Steve Kozak
has reviewed the plan recommendations with the District's
insurers. Proposals will be solicited for the implementation of the
recommendations. The project has a $28 million budget.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval.
(16) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(17) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
(18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(20) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
April 6, 2000 at 5 p.m.
P' PDC Committee Minutes
Page 7
March 2, 2000
(21) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Submitted by.
J Tappan
D Committee Secretary
r:w.v.�.�oanmwoc�000uaiww�ecmwzao we�.ti�ures.ax
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dace ToBd ofO,.
3-2-Or n-2aol
AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe Iem Non
D 'o - rl e
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, irector of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT,
CONTRACT NO. 7-28
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company
authorizing an addition of$19,957, increasing the total contract amount to $211,561;
(2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing the total
contract amount to the final contract amount of$204,016; and (3)Accept RA 6 "B"
Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 1 includes two items of added work and one item of deleted work to
Contract No. 7-28. Change Order No. 2 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities to
Contract No. 7-28. There are no errors associated with this change order. There is a 5
day time extension associated with Change Order No. 1. Liquidated damages on this
contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
Contract Start Date July 29, 1999
Original Contract Completion Date November 25, 1999
Total Number of Change Order to Date 2
Current Contract Completion Date November 25, 1999
Actual Completion Date November 19, 1999
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 191,604.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (CO No. 1, Add) $ 19,957.00
This Change (CO No. 2, Deduct) $ (7,545.00)
Change Orders To Date $ 12,412.00
Percent Increase To Date 6.48%
Final Contract Price $ 204,016.00
G NWlobaWenda DnM1 RepoANO n]38 C01.W2 CIMMN33Yll.ed
RM . �M8 Page 1
BUDGET IMPACT
�v
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 1998-99 Budget Capital Projects Zone 7, Line i)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The contingency fund of the project budget will provide increased construction contract
cost. Refer to the Budget Information Table for more information.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contract No. 7-28, RA 6"B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, includes
installation of clay pipe and manholes, interception of laterals, and abandonment of
existing sewers within the City of Tustin. DGA Consultants, Inc. prepared the plans and
specifications and the contract was awarded to Mladen Grbavac Construction Company
on May 26, 1999. The contract is 100% complete.
The following summarizes Change Order No. 1:
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Extra Paving and Latex Slurry Seal $8 545 0 Desi n Change
2 Traffic Loo Re lacement $ 1,000 0 Design Change
3 Undisclosed Utilities $12 412 1 5 1 Changed Condition
TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $19,9571 5
Item No. 1 reflects paving adjustments required by the City. Cost along with a
deduction as summarized in Change Order No. 2 combine to a net cost of$1,000 for
this item. Item No. 3 compensates the contractor for standby time and extra work
associated with utilities not shown on the contract drawings and not marked in the field.
The following summarizes Change Order No.2:
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities 1 $ 545 0 1 Other
TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $ 7 545 0
This item adjusts the contract bid items to the actual quantities incorporated into the
work. See attached Change Order No. 2 for more information.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Notice of Exemption was filed on April 8, 1999.
G:bt6bbaM endaG Rfp b L 7-U MI.M.WwRll]1W.dp
"M.. a2G"° Page 2
4
v` ATTACHMENTS
4
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 2
G 4A91oLVIVpentla DnM PepvMW�QFfl]]6 COt,CO],G�wG13GN.ON page 3
0.rnseE: 9/dIRB
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT
CONTRACT NO. 7-28
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTrTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 100%
Design Staff $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 29,149 58%
Consultant PSA $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 6,484 26%
Construction Contract $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 4,016 $ 204,016 $ 191,604 $ 12,412 $ 204,016 $ 183,099 90%
Construction(Other) $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,328 67%
Construction Staff $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ - $ 49,000 $ 41,466 85%
Contingency $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ (4,016) $ 58,984 $ 0%
TOTAL $ 395.000 $ 395,000 $ - $ 395.000 $ 323.604 1 $ 12,412 1 $ 336.016 $ 266,526 79%
7-28 Budget Table CO 1,CO 2, Closeout
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT
CONTRACT NO. 7-28
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 07/29/1999 $ 191,604.00 $ 191,604.00 _ 120 120
CO NO, 1 Pending $ 19,957.00 $ 211,561.00 10,42% 5 125
CO NO, 2 1 Pending 1 $ (7,545.00)1 $ 204,016.00 6.48% 0 125
7-28 C01, CO2 chngstat report
y Page 1 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Dale: January 24, 2000
RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28
Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc.
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Dedsst) $19,957.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —EXTRA PAVING AND LATEX SLURRY SEAL
This item is for extra paving and the addition of latex to road slurry. The City of Tustin required
additional paving on Mitchell Avenue in exchange for reduced pavement grinding in the
Newport/Mitchell Avenue intersection. The City further required a latex addition to road slurry seal,
which was not a contract requirement. Total costs for this item are reduced by$7,545 for reduction of
pavement grinding quantities, as shown in Item No. 1 of attached Change Order No. 2. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (B)l and 2.a of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,545.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—TRAFFIC LOOP REPLACEMENT
This item is for deleted traffic loop replacement work in the NewporUMitchell Avenue intersection. The
work was deleted from the contract because the City of Tustin elected to replace traffic loops at a later
time under a separate City contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6 (B)l and 2.a of the General Provisions.
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($1,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3— UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES
This item is for delays and extra work associated with undisclosed telephone and waterlines, and
incorrectly shown sewer house connections. The Contractor damaged telephone lines in the
Newport/Mitchell Avenue intersection and a waterline on Mitchell Avenue. The lines were not shown
on the contract drawings and not marked in the field. The repair of these lines, which was done by the
Utilities with Contractor help, delayed critical path contract work. Locations of sewer house
connections on "B" Street from Station 6+15 to Station 6+45 were incorrectly shown on the drawings.
The extra work consisted of exploratory excavations to locale the pipes. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (B)1 and 2.a of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,412.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 24, 2000
RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28
Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc.
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $19,957.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 5 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 5 day extension of
time is required for this change order, and that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: July 29, 1999
Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: November 25, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 5 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 5 Calendar Days - -
Revised Contract Time: 125 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 30, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None
Actual Final Completion Date: November 19, 1999
Original Contract Price $ 191,604.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 19,957.00
Amended Contract Price $ 211,561.00
Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 24 2000
RA 6 "S" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28
Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc.
Board Authorization Date: March 22, 2000
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
MLADEN GRBAVAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Contractor Date
\Ydonws iMp.dt ngVOBS 8 CONTRACTSV-28\Constn ionM gement\CO t\C0728-01.d
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dare To Bd.MDir.
03/02/00 03/22/00
AGENDA REPORT I paugmo e6 Item NIN
um
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David L , Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: LONG-TERM SEWER MONITORING PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73-2
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a Long-Term
Sewer Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2.
SUMMARY
The District is beginning an aggressive campaign to reduce rain dependant inflow and
infiltration (RDII) as part of the implementation of the District's Strategic Plan. The goal of
the RDII element in the Strategic Plan is to reduce wet weather peaking at the District's two
wastewater treatment facilities by 20%.
In conjunction with the Cooperative Projects Program, Staff is proposing the
implementation of a long-term sewer monitoring program. The long-term sewer
monitoring program will help the District to accomplish the following:
• Prioritize RDII Sites and Projects
• Monitor Effectiveness of RDII Projects
• Gauge Effectiveness of Overall Cooperative Projects Program
• Establish Point of Diminishing Return of the Cooperative Projects Program
• Reduce the Need for Temporary Monitoring Activities Throughout OCSD
The total cost estimate over the next ten years is $5,000,000. The cost estimate includes
$3,000,000 to establish a network of approximately 170 flow meters. The estimate also
includes$2,000,000 to maintain the meters and analyze flow data over the next ten years.
This project has been reviewed by the Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee
and was recommended to be reviewed by the Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee (PDC).
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The cost estimate includes $3,000,000 to establish the program and install flow meters.
The estimate also includes $2,000,000 to maintain the meters and analyze flow data over
the next ten years. The total estimate for outside services is $5,000,000 over the next ten
years and would be funded from Job No. J-73.
aw.. MM Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
i
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
The $5,000,000 is included in the CORF budget under Job. No. J-73. The total budget for
the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is $149,990,000, and will be spent over
the next twenty years on projects reducing and identifying RDII throughout the District.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
See attached Staff Report
ALTERNATIVES
Do not implement permanent long-term monitoring at this time. This alternative will not
avoid up to $4.3 million in required temporary monitoring activities over the next ten years.
This will also limit the District's ability to monitor the effectiveness of the Cooperative
Projects Program. The District will not be able to identify the largest and most significant
sources of RDII, or identify the point of diminishing return for the program. Finally, the no-
action alternative can hinder RDII reduction and cause capital and operational costs
avoided in the Strategic Plan.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is categorically exempt.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff Report
JDH:JB:jak
GWglobaMgenda Draft RepoftTDCV-734 AR 030200.d.
Page 2
V b ,
a
1
February 9, 2000
STAFF REPORT
Proposed Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program
Strategic Plan Findings and the Cooperative Projects Program
The Strategic Plan concluded that flow capacity improvements, including a costly new
outfall, can be avoided by implementing a program to reduce rain dependant inflow and
infiltration (RDII) in the local agencies' collection systems. Currently, a wet weather peak of
2.2 times the average daily flow occurs at the plants during storm events, primarily due to
RDII. According to District historical records, this peak flow has increased from 1.8 to 2.2
times average daily flow over the past 20 years. This increasing trend will continue over
time if a RDII control program is not actively pursued.
In response to this finding, the District has initiated the Cooperative Projects Program. The
Cooperative Projects Program is an incentive program to encourage local agencies to find
and eliminate all forms of unwanted inflow including RDII. Program funding by the District,
includes subsidies of up to 50% of the project's costs for local agencies that meet the
District's program requirements. Total Cooperative Projects Program funding is budgeted
at$149,990,000 over the next 20 years.
As part of the Cooperative Projects Program, investigations are being conducted in areas
with elevated RDII. These investigations are focusing on characterizing defects found
during the preparation of the Strategic Plan and will be completed in June 2000. These
studies will help the District to understand the complexity of investigating and eliminating
RDII and help direct future RDII investigations. In conjunction with the Cooperative Projects
Program, the District's O&M department has established a manhole plugging/sealing
program for agencies with areas subject to flooding.
Need for a Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program
The District has taken several least cost measures to identify and reduce RDII. The District
supplies local agencies with manhole plugs and sealant for manhole covers subject to
flooding. Possible sources of RDII causing wet weather peaking are discussed in the
Strategic Plan include: manhole lids; roof drains; high groundwater levels; and other
sources for reference. The Cooperative Projects Program has been established to sponsor
local agency projects. In addition, the District conducts temporary flow monitoring activities
in the local agency collection system when necessary for District studies.
oDSD - P.D.Sox 912] 3 Fount M VWIW.CA 92728-9127 - (714)982-2411
Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program
Page 2 /
February 9, 2000 Y
However, only a handful of agencies have taken advantage of the manhole plugging/sealing
program. It was infeasible for the Strategic Plan to identify where RDII is prevalent
throughout the District. Although, temporary monitoring during the preparation of the
Strategic Plan did identify four areas with peaking factors as high as 5.0. And, three are
being investigated as RDII "hot spots."
After reviewing the response to the Manhole plugging program, the condition of the local
agencies sewer maps, the data regarding areas subject to flooding, and the projects
generated during from the Cooperative Projects Program, it was determined that it will be
difficult to implement any RDII mitigation program without a flow monitoring program. This
is because local agency funding is scarce limiting participation in most District programs.
Thus, large potential sources of RDII still need to be located and prioritized. And, at this
rate of RDII reduction, after 20 years, the District will fall short of its goal.
Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program Outline
The Concept of a long-term sewer monitoring program was presented to the District's
Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee in August 1999. A monitoring program
was included with a presentation on the findings of the temporary monitoring program
performed during the preparation of the Strategic Plan. The long-term sewer monitoring
program includes an estimated 167 permanent and up to 250 temporary flow meters
throughout the collection system.
Local agencies typically conduct, short-term, investigations during the preparation of sewer
master plans and sewer deficiency studies. These investigations are used to calibrate
wastewater flow models. For example, during the preparation of the City of Seal Beach's
Sewer Master Plan, three monitoring locations were selected. The City of Brea is planning
for approximately 10 temporary monitoring locations. These efforts are good starting points
and can identify if RDII exists for the larger areas or portion of the agencies. Follow-up
monitoring for smaller areas within the agencies problematic areas can then determine
specific RDII sources.
An effective monitoring program needs to involve converting local agency sewer maps to an
electronic format. Then, using the developed map(s), key monitoring locations for flow
meters throughout the District could effectively be placed. Key locations would include a
combination of drainage basin confluence points, prime locations within the District's trunks,
and unmetered drainage crossing Revenue Area boundaries.
Two effective programs have been developed to identify RDII. The first is a two-year effort
using approximately 1200 temporary monitors, 1 meter for every 30,000 linear feet of sewer
throughout the District. The second involves a long-term metering program that identifies
RDII in larger areas and leads to temporary monitoring in problematic areas. The long-term
program includes approximately 150 to 200 meters for optimum results. The goal of the
long-term sewer monitoring program will be to divide the District into segments, each with
approximately 150,000 linear feet of sewer pipe. In subsequent program years, temporary
flow monitors will be used to pinpoint sources of RDII in areas with significant levels of RDII,
and to work with local agencies to mitigate the RDII.
Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program
Page 3
•� February 9, 2000
The long-term program is recommended and is the least cost alternative of the two. The
program also provides the most comprehensive data set, and can be used to replace
several planned temporary monitoring efforts.
Program Benchmarking
In order to establish an effective monitoring program, several agencies throughout the U.S.
were contacted that are conducting similar peak flow reduction and long-term sewer
monitoring programs. Table 1 contains a list of the agencies conducting peak flow
management programs. As shown in Table 1, many of the agencies are conducting their
programs because of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) litigation over combined
sewer overflows (CSO) and sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The other large category on
Table 1 includes agencies that use permanent flow meters to bill customers. However,
there are a number of agencies that conduct programs solely to manage peak flow similar
to the District's proposed program. These agencies are Massachusetts Water Resources
Authority (MWRA), Kings County Washington (KCW), City of Indianapolis, and Washington
D.C. They are actively monitoring to understand system capacity, controlling RDII, and
avoiding costly sewer capacity projects.
Table 2 contains details for the agency program listed in Table 1 if their programs are used
to eliminate RDII. These agencies vary greatly is size. Thus, the information was converted
to figures that can be compared. The "Comparative Service Area Features" column
contains service area characteristics per meter. The proposed District program compares
well with the other agencies' programs. In fact, six of the ten agencies are conducting more
aggressive monitoring programs than the proposed District program. Finally, Table 2
identifies also the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) recommended monitoring
program parameters.
Program Cost-Benefit
The estimated cost of an effective long-term sewer monitoring program is approximately $5
million dollars over the next ten years. This is based on other agency experience and
published metering data. That includes $3 million for converting local agency sewer maps
to an electronic format, selecting key monitoring locations, and the installation of
approximately 170 meters. The remaining $2 million is for maintaining the meters and
analyzing the monitoring data over the ten-year period.
The costs for a long-term sewer monitoring program cannot be analyzed using the District's
traditional rate-of-return, or payback period methodology. However, the program costs can
be analyzed looking at the avoided costs for future monitoring activities and other intangible
benefits.
The estimated avoided cost for future monitoring activities, over the next ten years, is
estimated at up to $4.3 million. This is based on the following assumptions:
Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program
Page 4
February 9, 2000 (�
• The estimated cost for placing, maintaining, and analyzing data of a temporary
meter is $5000.
• The following monitoring activities will occur without permanent monitors in the
sewer system:
- Each of the approved Cooperative Program projects will require pre and post-
monitoring. This involves 10 projects per year for 10 years, or 100 projects,
totaling $1,000,000 in monitoring.
- Each agency will prepare a Sewer Master Plan, or a Sewer Master Plan
update, every five years. Each agency effort will involve-at least 5 metering
locations that would have contained a permanent meter. This involves 23
agencies with 2 projects over the next 10 years and includes 5 metering
locations totaling $1,150,000.
- Each agency will prepare electronic maps for the area. The proposed District
program could avoid duplicated administrative costs associated with hiring
and administrating a consulting contract. This is estimated at$1,000 per
agency that does not have electronic mapping today, or$20,000.
The District is planning approximately 50 sewer relief projects during the next
10 years. These projects generally involve pre and post-monitoring. This will
equate to an estimated $500,000 in flow monitoring over the next 10 years.
- The District will update its Master Plan or its Strategic Plan in 5 to 10 years.
This effort will require a flow monitoring effort similar to the recent Strategic
Plan. This equates to approximately$400,000 in monitoring.
- The District currently installs temporary monitors for maintenance reasons
and by request of the Engineering Department. Up to 2 temporary meters
are placed per month. At this rate, over the next 10 years, this would equal
$1,200,000.
The intangible benefits to the program include:
• The District could better monitor the progress of the RDII elimination program.
This includes RDII reduction, aimed at reducing peak wet weather flows to the
treatment plants by 20%.
• The District could better monitor the timing of its sewer repair and replacement
program totaling $221,000,000 over the next 20 years.
• The District could better monitor the condition of the sewer system and
preventively maintain the sewer system—reduce potential for catastrophic failures.
• The District could use the monitors to supervise operations during storm events.
Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program
Page 5
a February 9, 2000
• The District could monitor areas as they age and determine if inflow and infiltration
is increasing.
• The District could monitor and mitigate unusual, but reoccurring, activities in the
sewer system.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Long-term sewer monitoring programs can be effective in identifying RDII based on other
agency's experience. In the District's case, a long-term sewer monitoring program will aid
in administering its $149,990,000 Cooperative Projects Program. The recommended
program, as shown in Table 2, compares well with established monitoring programs and
should be an effective tool.
In particular, this tool will allow the District to monitor progress of RDII and peak flow
reductions, establish a point of diminishing return for the entire Cooperative Projects
Program, and allow bettering monitoring of flow within the Revenue Districts. The program
can also replace a number of planned temporary monitoring activities. Thus, the program's
costs can be offset by up to 80%. Therefore, it is recommended that the long-term sewer
monitoring program be implemented.
JB.,jak
H:WpAtakigVOBS&CONTRACTSV-73-2%Staff Report for ARAae
PDC COMMITTEE MeetingDMe Toee.ofoar.
312/00 3/22/00
AGENDA REPORT P I mNumber Item unbpr
Cno-17
Orange County Sanitation DI
FROM: David Lu , irector of Engineering
Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-49
REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-50
REHABILITATION OF THE 14TM STREET PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-51
REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-52
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS & REHABILITATION TO
OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS,
CONTRACT NO. 2-37
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; (2) Establish a budget for the
Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, for a total
budget of$4,124,000; (3) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14m
Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, for a total budget of$2,210,000;
(4) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-52, for a total budget of$2,248,000; (5)Approve a budget
amendment of($12,061,000)for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation
to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for a total budget of$14,284,200;
and (6)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. to provide
engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract
Nos. 5-49, 5-50, 5-51 and 5-52, for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801.
SUMMARY
The District's 1989 Master Plan outlined reliability criteria for modifications and
future designs of the outlying pump stations. The Master Plan also
recommended improvements to the pump stations to meet the criteria outlined.
In 1999, MacDonald-Stephens Engineering (MSE) completed an assessment of
17 of the District's outlying pump stations and two of the District's outlying meter
stations as part of Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying
Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37. The assessment included the reliability
criteria set forth in the 1989 Master Plan as well as evaluations of electrical area
\4vp0n 4iN NNOdMpdnddD ft Reymrwo 9M0303WAM
Page 1
1
I
classification, safety code compliance, on-site power generation, corrosion
status, mechanical and seismic conditions, and hydraulic capacity to meet the
District's 1999 Strategic Plan projected for peak flows for each facility. The
resulting report documents the mechanical, electrical, structural, seismic and
safety deficiencies, and recommends improvements to each facility in meeting
national and state code and current District standards. Cost estimates for each
were also included.
The extent of the modifications and improvements to each facility warrants a
separate construction project for each of the pump stations. The engineering
design for these improvements can be grouped together for similar construction
projects. Staff recommends the following pump stations, all located in the City of
Newport Beach, be grouped together for the first Professional Services
Agreement(PSA):
Bitter Point Pump Station Replacement
Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement
14"' Street Pump Station Rehabilitation
"A" Street Pump Station Rehabilitation
The PSA includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report, Construction
Documents, and Construction Support Services for bidding and construction of
each of the four pump stations. Tasks include but are not limited to siting
studies, hydraulic analysis of the force main network, CEQA & EIR
documentation, plans and specifications, geotechnical investigation, surveying,
permit and property acquisition services, and cost estimates.
Staff received proposals from four firms: Boyle Engineering Corp.; Lee & Ro
Engineering, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers/ RW Beck, Inc.; and Malcom
Pimie, Inc. Staff recommends approval of a PSA for the design and construction
support services for the four pump stations with Lee & Ro, Inc.,for an amount not
to exceed $1,149,801.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total budget estimate for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-49, excluding funds required for additional property acquisition, is
$3,479,000. Costs are to be split 75% to Revenue Area 5 and 25% to Revenue
Area 6.
The total budget estimate for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-50, excluding funds required for additional property acquisition, is
$4,124,000. Costs are to be split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25% to Revenue
Area 6.
O[ot&baa t N,ymuNppiga pad geNrlT➢pL W 9 M 0]03CO.Ez
Page 2
y
The total budget for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-51, is $2,210,000, all costs directed to Revenue Area 5.
The total budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A"Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-52, is $2,248,000, all costs directed to Revenue Area 5.
The total budget for the original project, Miscellaneous Improvements and
Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, is reduced by
$12,061,000 to $14,284,200.
See attached Budget Information Tables for more information.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This 'item has been budgeted. (Line item:As noted below)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Contract Nos. 5-49, 5-50, 5-51, and 5-52, are within the Scope of Work of the
original Contract No. 2-37, Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to
Outlying Pump Stations in the current CIP Budget. Contract No. 2-37 funds have
been allocated to the various revenue areas, in proportion to the flow from each
revenue area. (Reference 1999-00 Budget, Revenue Area 2, page 26, Revenue
Area 3, page 32, Revenue Area 5, page 38, Revenue Area 6, page 42, Revenue
Area 7, page 44, and Revenue Area 11, page 61). Staff requests the reallocation
of funds from Contract No. 2-37's budget be based on specific facility
requirements and reassigned to individual facility contracts as required.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pump Station Backoround
Bitter Point and Rocky Point pump stations were built in the late 1930s for the
City of Newport Beach and last upgraded in 1992. The upgrades replaced
existing wom-out pumps (Bitter Point only) and motors and out of date variable
frequency drives and controls with new units that met 1992 codes and District
standards. The pump stations are located in Revenue Area 5, but service flows
from both Revenue Areas 5 and 6. Each station pumps into a force main
network system that discharges into the District's Wastewater Plant No. 2. Bitter
Point Pump Station is located at 5800 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach at
the entrance the Armstrong Petroleum Oilfield. Rocky Point Pump Station is
located at 1221 Coast Highway, Newport Beach within the confines of the Balboa
Bay Club.
\Y�elYCa9f YrgtGN..p8ui 0i2fl F4 6\PK1S<9AR0.WMOC[
Page 3
a
The 140 Street and "A" Street pump stations were built in the late 1940s for the
City of Newport Beach and were last upgraded in 1972. Both pump stations are
located in Revenue Area 5. The 14" Street Pump Station is located at 1400
Balboa Blvd., Newport Beach at Balboa Blvd. and 10 Street. The 10 Street
Pump Station pumps into the collection system that discharges into the District's
Lido Pump Station. Lido Pump Station pumps into same force main network as
Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations. The "A" Street Pump Station is
located on Balboa Blvd. in Newport Beach at Balboa Blvd. and "A" Street. "A"
Pump Station pumps into the collection system that discharges into the 14"
Street Pump Station.
Each of the four pump stations has numerous mechanical, electrical, structural,
seismic and safety deficiencies in meeting current national and state codes and
current District standards. Thus the pump stations require replacement and/or
rehabilitation. Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations are also inadequate in
size to accommodate the equipment necessary to bring the stations up to code
or meet the OCSD 1999 Strategic Plan's projected flows or to accommodate
standby power facilities.
Pr000sal Evaluation
The proposals were evaluated in accordance with District policy. Lee & Ro, Inc.
was the highest ranked consultant. Their proposal provided insight to all key
issues. The proposal ranked first in nearly every category, (project approach and
understanding of the Scope of Work, managing and performing the work,
applicable related project experience, and applicable staff qualifications). Lee &
Ro Inc.'s fee proposal was the second lowest, with only the third ranked
consultant, Malcom Pimie, Inc., providing a lower fee. However, Lee & Ro's
proposal rating was significantly higher than Malcom Pimie. The proposed fee
from the second ranked consultant, MSE Engineers / RW Beck, was significantly
higher than the fee proposed by Lee & Ro, Inc.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) may be awarded to another
engineering firm that submitted a proposal.
2. A PSA for the design and construction support services for each of the four
pump stations could be awarded to one or more engineering firths. The
choice to award individual PSAs would result in a higher fee, possible
duplication of work at a cost to the products the District is to receive.
,mwrvamn o�wxm"aen aw�swoos-esna oxzoo.aa
Page 4
ti
CEQA FINDINGS
The rehabilitation of the outlying pump stations is addressed in the 1999
Strategic Plan / EIR. Several but not all of the pump stations were individually
addressed. CEQA/EIR requirements will be evaluated and addressed by the
District's consultant, K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. Lee & Ro, Inc. will provide support to
K.P. Lindstrom under this PSA.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-49)
2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-50)
3. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-51)
4. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-52)
5. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 2-37)
6. Budget Summary Table (Outlying Pump Station Projects By Revenue Area)
WDC.jak:jo:jak
PmCalMelalNl ApmOe Oren Repvb`POL gM U�.Ex
Page 5
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5.49e
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development E 35,OD0 f 35.000 E 35,000 S 35.000 0%
Design Staff S 139.000 f 139.000 $ 139.000 E 139,000 0%
Cwwllant PSA S 418.000 f 418,000 $ 324.537 S 324.537 0%
Construction Contract $ 1916,000 E 1B16,000 b
Construction Other) E 36.000 S 36.000 E
Construction Staff $ 355,000 $ 355.000 E
Conti $ 580,000 f 580,000 E
TOTAL f E 3,479.000 f 3,479,000 E - f 498,537 S 499537 f 0%
Costs associated with the Bitter Point Pump Station are split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25%to Revenue Area 6.
R",ftWVU003 aC ACTS a PI.PS45J99ueael Te W-]q -
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
REPLACEMENT OF ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-50'
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development E 41.000 $ 41,000 $ 41.000 $ 41,000 0%
Design Staff E 165.000 E 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 165,0D0 0%
Consultant PSA $ 496,000 $ 496.000 $ 3444679 $ 344,679 0%
Construction Contract $ 2.273,DOD $ 2.273,0DO E
Construction(Other) $ 41,000 $ 41,000 g
Construction Staff $ 420,000 S 420,000 $
Contingency $ 688.000 $ SBB.000 $
TOTAL $ - s - $ 4,124,D00 $ 4,124,000 $ - E 550,679 $ 550,679 $ 0%
Costs associated with the Rocky Point Pump Station are split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25%to Revenue Area 5.
H M .dt.k,g OBS a CONTRACTS45.50 Rocky PI.P311550 Budeei T.W.W.IDlnrlp.
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
REHABILITATION OF THE 14TH STREET PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO, 5-51
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project DevebpvM $ 22.000 $ 22,000 S 22,000 $ 22,0D0 0%
Design StaO $ 88.000 S 88,wo $ 88,000 $ 88,000 0%
Consuftat8 PSA $ 266,0D0 $ 266,000 $ 242.795 S 242,795 0%
Construction Contract $ 1,217,000 $ 1.217,000 $
Conatruction(DOW) S 22,000 S 22.000 S
Construction Staff S 226.DW $ 226,000 S
Conlingency S 369.000 $ 369.000 $
TOTAL S - S - f 2,210,OW S 2,210,000 " f - f 352,795 $ 352,795 $ 0%
X hx eblawnglIOBS a CCNIRAGT -51141E M PSNS 51 Budget Table HsjDatnM
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
REHABILITATIOPN OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-52
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Proje Development S 23.000 $ 23,000 <_ 23.000 S 23,000 0%
Design Staff E 90,000 E 90.000 E 90.000 E 90.000 0%
Consollarrt PSA E 270.000 $ 270,000 S 237,790 $ 237.790 0%
Construction Contact $ 1 238.0DD $ 1.238.000 S
Construction(Og r) $ 22,DD0 $ 22,000 $
ConsWction Staff E 230,000 $ 230.000 $
Contingemy E 375.DD0 E 375,000 S
TOTAL E - S - S 2,248,000 S 2248.000 5 - S 350.790 1 S 350,790 $ 0%
H%w &abngW aCOR ACTSL-52 A St PSIS-528WgM Table Ws]Dsincts
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS & REHABILITATION TO OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS
CONTRACT NO. 2.37•
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 26,550 $ 175,500 $ 121,C00) S 54.500 $ 175.000 $ 175,000 $ 27.292 16%
Design Staff $ 137,500 $ 908,500 $ 462,000) $ 426.500 S 908.500 $ 908.500 $ 402,028 44%
Consultant PSA $ 357,500 $ 2,361,400 E 1n5Q000) $ 911.400 $ 631,000 $ 531,000 $ 531,000 100%
RC.n.�.ftnract $ 2,372,000 $ 15,678.700 E 6,644,1700 $ 9.034.700 S $ - $
er) $ 89,400 S 590,900 $ I ' 121,000 $ 469.900 S $ - $
$ 360,750 $ 2,384.500 8 1,231,000 $ 1.153,500 $
$ 642,300 $ 4,245.700 $ 2.012,000) $ 2.233,700 $
$ 3.986,000 $ 26,345,200 $ (12,061 000) $ 14,284,200 $ 1,614,500 $ - $ 1,614,500 $ 960.320 59%
Cost associated with Contract No. 2-37 have been split as follows: 10%to Revenue Area 2 06%to Revenue Area 6
14%to Revenue Area 3 33%to Revenue Area 7
28%to Revenue Area 5 09%to Revenue Area 11
H1wp.ala engUOBs&CONTRACM5 49 Bitter PI.PSg237 ReNeed Budget Table AslCutncts
BUDGET SUMMARY TABLE
OUTLYING PUMP STATION PROJECTS BY REVENUE AREA
Revenue Area 2 3 5 e 7 11 14 Totals
Contract 2-37 Current 99-00 $2,634,600 $3688,300 $7378.700 $1580,700 $8,893900 $2.371,000 1 $26.345,200
reposed Re-allocation 99-0B $1,208,137 111,638,527 $3,377,100 $723855 $3980123 $1,085,458 $12.081000
Contract 2-37 Revised 99-00 $1,428,420 $1,999.788 $3.999.578 $857,052 $4,713,7861 $1,285.578 1 1 $14.284.200
Revenue Area 2 3 5 1 8 1 7 1 11 14 Totals
Proposed 99-00 Budget Additions
Contract 5-49 Bitter Pt,Pump Station' $2.609,250 $869.750 $3,479 000
Contract 5.50 Rocky PI.Pump Station' $3,093 000 $1,031,000 $4,124.000
Contract 5-51 14it1 St.Pump Station $2210,000 $2,210 000
Contract 5-52 •A' $2 248,000 $2,248.000
Subtotal $10,160,250 $1.900.750 $12,061,000
Future Budget Items 00.01••
Contract 2-37 Miscall. Improvements $120,000 $168,000 $336000 $72.000 $396.000 $108000 1 $1.200,000
Contract 3.51 Seal Beach Pump Station $3,227.000 $3,227,000
Contract 3-52 Westlde Pump Station $1,619,000 $1619.000
Contract 5.63 Bay Bridge Pum Station $10393130 $54,700 $1,094000
Contract 5-54 Crystal Cove Pump Station $306.ODO $306 000
Contract 7-47 College Ave.Pump Station $247 850 $4 709 150 $4,957 000
Contract 7.48 Main St.Pump Station $78 400 $201 600 $280.000
Contract 7-49 MacAnnur Pump Station I $1,354,000 1 $1354.000
Contract 11-28 Edinger Pump Station $1 $1,518000
Slater PumpStation $22.400 ;$1,4743.600
$140.000
Green River Meter Station $225,000 $225 000
Mal St.Meter Station $52.000 $52000
Subtotal $345,000 $5,036,400 $1,681,30D $319,850 $6.589,550 ;$25.6,300 $15,972,000Total•" $345,000 $5,036,400 $11,B41,550 $2.220,600 $6,589.550 $28.033,000
Excludes funds required for additional properly acquisition.
Preliminary budget figures
•••Allocation of funds based on facility requirements by Revenue Area
H Mp.dueeipUOB&&CONTRACTS 19 Behr R PS12.37 Budget Table by Reronue lvess.alsl&heen
PDC COMMITTEE mesa 9Date TOBO.or Dlr
s-2-m 3-zz-oo
AGENDA REPORT Item Number omN
PDCuc-Ifl
Orange County Sanitadon Dis -
FROM: David Ludwi , Director of Engineering
Originator: Mark A. Tomko, Project Manager
SUBJECT: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION,
CONTRACT NO. 7-21
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to prepare a
preliminary design report and construction documents for the rehabilitation of the
Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not
to exceed $175,261.
SUMMARY
The Sunflower Trunk Sewer, located primarily in the Sunflower Avenue right of way in
the cities of Fountain Valley, Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, was built in three phases in
1971 and 1972. The sewer is comprised of plastic (PVC) lined reinforced concrete pipe
ranging from 84 to 54 inches in diameter and an approximate length of 5.3 miles.
In August 1999, DGA Consultants, Inc., completed a project report identifying significant
pipeline and manhole defects and recommending rehabilitation work. In accordance
with District policy, Staff has solicited proposals for the design of the rehabilitation of the
Sunflower Trunk Sewer and Manholes.
The following three firms submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: (1)AKM
Consulting Engineers; (2) DGA Consultants, Inc.; and (3)Tran Consulting Engineers.
Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement(PSA)with Train
Consulting Engineers, for an amount not to exceed $175,261.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the
project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. Project development
costs are estimated to increase by $2,000. Design staff costs are estimated to
decrease by$71,774. The PSA's for this job are divided into two separate PSA's.
PSA 1 was a design study. PSA 2 is this PSA for the final design and construction
support. PSA 2 costs are estimated to increase by$75,000. This is offset by the
$71,774 decrease in Design staff costs.
efpe8 Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT }
® This Rem has been budgeted. (Line item: Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation,
Contract No. 7-21).
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Funds were moved in the budget table between project tasks to cover past and
anticipated expenditures with no change to the total project budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
The Sunflower Trunk Sewer was constructed in three phases in 1971 and 1972, and
runs from McGaw Avenue and Redhill in Irvine to Plant No. 1. The 1989 Master Plan
recommended that rehabilitation of aging interceptor sewers be part of the District's on-
going program of repairing and lining previously unlined and unprotected sewer and
manhole structures.
DGA Consultants, Inc. investigated the pipeline by conducting a closed circuit television
inspection in June 1999. The preliminary report identified the most significant pipeline
defects as mineral deposits, grease buildup, minor weld separation, and debris at the
top of the pipe. The report recommended that the sewer be rehabilitated by:
• Cleaning
• Diversion and removal of mineral deposits
• Testing the entire pipe liner and PVC welds
• Spot repairs of defects discovered by testing
DGA Consultants, Inc. conducted man entry inspections to inspect the manholes. The
inspectors identified that most of the existing manholes have flat roofs and are in need
of rehabilitation. The preliminary project report recommended that the manholes be
repaired and rehabilitated by:
• Cleaning and lining the vaults
• Removing vault roofs and replacing with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) lined cones
• Installing a PVC liner on the existing vault walls
• Repairing damaged shelf lining
• Installing gas flaps
Proposal Evaluation
Of the three firms submitting proposals, AKM Consulting Engineers had the highest
ranking based on their project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, and their
plan for managing and performing the work. Tran Consulting Engineers had the second
highest ranked proposal and the lowest fee, which was approximately half of AKM
"^e°°: earvoe Page 2
V
Consulting Engineer's proposed fee. Tran Consulting Engineer's proposal did not
contain the level of detail as AKM Consulting Engineers but did confirm an
understanding of the job and proposed innovative ideas for rehabilitating the sewer line
and manholes. Tran Consulting Engineers has experience on similar jobs, and has
worked successfully on other projects with the District. Tran Consulting Engineers
proposed subconsultants for geotechnical services, environmental issues, and traffic
control included professionals that have experience on other jobs within the project
area. See the attached Staff Evaluation of the Proposals for additional information.
ALTERNATIVES
The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) may be awarded to another engineering
firm that submitted a proposal.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Strategic Plan and Environmental Impact Report that
was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Completion was filed on October 29,
1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
MAT:jo Jak
G:l tglobal\Agenda Deft ReportslPDW-21 AR 030200.dot
aee: Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation
Contract No. 7.21
i ? 'OIt1< " °< Iy3EF7T a PRiS a1 d@eSED� PRT/P�OSED - D ESTINfATED(
I E0, 18 SED' :Ae I4AU ,{ate-' r T�7'�- COIIfir�TP.
.4 ` •S' '� uN1l 11 .GE7! INC U � � $ 1d r Mh REDUE a xr;- H(`)ROA710N i t'_ 0 QATE(%)
St
Project Dovelopamt $ 18.000 $ 17,000 $ 2,000 $ 19.000 $ 17,000 $ 2,000 $ 19,000 $ 18.216 107%
Desi nStaff $ 88.000 $ 264.400 1$ 71.774 $ 192,626 $ 264,400 $ 1,774 $ 192,626 $ 2.086 1%
Consultant PSA 1 $ 90.000 $ 90,000 8 5226 $ 84,774 - $ 84,774 $ - $ 84,774 $ 79,688 89%
Comultant PSA 2 $ - $ 125,000 $ 75,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 175261 $ 175,261 0%
Constriction Contract $ 3.511,025 $ 3,511.025 $ - $ 3,511,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 442 0%
Construction other $ - $ - $ 8 - E . $ - $
Comtruc8on Staff $ 474,626 $ 482,300 $ - $ 482,300 $ - $ - $ . $ 0%
contingency $ 897,898 $ 897,898 $ - $ 897,898 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
TOTAL 8 5,079,549 $ 6.387,623 $ - $ 5,387.623 $ 366.174 $ 105,487 $ 471.661 $ 10D,432 2%
(1)denotes DGA Consultants Inc.
(2)denotes Tran Consulting Engineers
Kb,dww.,uoss WWRA S%7-2117-21 Mi99a1 IntoW
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To E%0f Dir.
3-02-00 3-22_0
AGENDA REPORT tMn Nom ril? Ran
Num
Orange County Sanitation
CqT
FROM: David L7nDirector of Engineering
Originator: Jeffrey D. Kidd, Contract Project Manager
SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare a
preliminary design report and construction documents for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed $224,800.
SUMMARY
This project consists of two sewer reaches that require improvements to address existing
and future deficiencies, primarily due to the proposed Boise Chica development located
south of Warner Avenue and west of Boise Chica Street. The first reach is located in
Warner Avenue in Huntington Beach. The second reach is located in Los Patos Avenue,
Boise Chica Street and Warner Avenue. The two reaches are approximately 1.75 miles in
combined length. The Strategic Plan identified these two reaches of the Warner Avenue
Sewer to be hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement.
The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) includes a utility search, geotechnical
investigation, flow monitoring, Preliminary Design Report (PDR), aerial and field surveying,
permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, construction cost estimates,
and construction support services.
Three firths submitted proposals on January 11, 2000: ASL Consulting Engineers, Daniel
Boyle Engineering, Inc., and Black & Veatch. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was also sent
to Psomas Engineers, but they declined to submit a proposal. Staff recommends approval
of a PSA with ASL Consulting Engineers, for an amount not to exceed $224,800.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
This proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the
project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. Project development costs
are estimated to increase by$9,800. The Consultant Professional Services Agreement
casts are estimated to increase by $35,000. All of this will be offset in the budget by
drawing down the contingency by$44,800, leaving the overall budget total the same.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item:Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22).
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
GNgIMMpsW OM awnwontt-n ut awmona
nm..a: ermne Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Of the three proposals submitted, ASL Consulting Engineers had a much higher ranked ,
proposal based on the high level of detail in their project approach, understanding of the
Scope of Work, and their plan for managing and performing the work. Daniel Boyle
Engineering, Inc. had the second highest ranked proposal and the lowest fee. Daniel
Boyle's proposal did not contain the level of detail presented in ASL's proposal, and did not
contain the level of preliminary engineering effort included in the ASL proposal. Other
factors unique to the ASL proposal included: an evaluation consisting of several weighing
factors and criteria for determination of the optimum design; lesser use of subconsultants;
recent project coordination experience (permitting, plan checking, etc.)with the City of
Huntington Beach; and more sewer related experience. See attached Staff Evaluation of
the proposals.
ALTERNATIVES
The Professional Services Agreement may be awarded to another engineering firm that
submitted a proposal.
CEQAA FINDINGS
This project is included in the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that
was certified on October 27, 1999 and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29,
1999. The Consultant will determine if supplemental environmental work will be required for
this project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
JDK:jak
GAnlglobaMgmtla Drea RepoftXPDM11.22 AR 030200Aoo
ft'.. Md"d Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer
Contract No. 11-22
1" •' rIORIflIN I �OP9B r PO FU r+ a £"IhROPp$�o .ESTIINAIIND IINATFD
P UO I1TiiOR��.5y�, P �t1 Db'Eh° a tpU TIONr v T - EXPENDILUR'Ir PEADrd"
>: 3 BUDGEh' -, `1 2I I�REA 1 TdibA nP; �� r.T - U1'HO�TION TO[IAYE f ATE(N.f:
Project Development $ 10.200 $ 10,200 $ 9,800 $ 20,000 $ 10,200 $ 9,800 $ 20.000 $ 17,000 85%
Design Staff I $ 176.400 $ 176400 $ 176,400 $ 176,400 $ 176,400 $ 0%
Consultant PSA $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 35,000 $ 250,000 1 1 $ 224,800 $ 224,800 $ 0%
Construction Contract $ 2,160,500 $ 2,180,500 $ 2.160,500 $ $
Construction Other $ $ - $
Construction Staff $ 536,100 $ 536,100 $ 536,100 $ - $
Contingency $ 929,500 $ 929500 $ 44,800 $ 884,700 Is, - is
TOTAL $ 4,027,700 $ 4,027,700 $ $ 4,027.700 $ 186,600 $ 234,600 $ 421.200 $ 17,000 4%
H9wp.Cla)engU0BS 8 CONTRACTSM-22 Wamer Ave.Relief Sewegfl l-22 Budget Info TableAslmstdcls
PDC COMMITTEE ReennyDace ToaG.afDir.
�aoD 3.2=
AGENDA REPORT Item mrntw Item ryug
PDCDn-de Cil
Orange County Sanitation Di
FROM: David Lu , irector of Engineering
Originator. Kelly Nakaya, Contract Project Manager
SUBJECT: GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS REACH A,
CONTRACT NO. 7-36; ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACT NO. 7-39; GISLER-REDHILL/NORTH TRUNK
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 7-41
GENERAL MANAGERS RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to provide
engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract
No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk
Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958.
SUMMARY
The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Reach A, Orange
Trunk, and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk in the City of Tustin, to be hydraulically deficient.
This combined project will replace approximately 40,000 feet of sewer pipe to alleviate the
deficiencies.
The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary
Design Report (PDR), utility research, geotechnical investigation, aerial and field surveying,
permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support
services for each individual contract.
Three fines submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: AKM Consulting Engineers, Boyle
Engineering Corporation, and URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. Staff recommends approval
of a PSA with AKM Consulting Engineers, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The proposed PSA is a new contract. See the attached Budget Information Tables for more
information.
The total combined project budget is $13,672,300.
BUDGETIMPACT
E This item has been budgeted. (One item: RA 7, Summary of Capital Requirements)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
GMp kfteMed RWya 7�,7. .7J7 M1 O]Vlo
RM emus Page 1
The funds for this project are from the Revenue Area No. 7 Capital Improvement Budget a
under three separate Contract Nos. 7-36, 7-39, and 7-41. A budget breakdown is Included
in the attached Budget Information Tables for these three contracts. For Contract No. 7-39
and Contract No. 7-41, Staff requests that a budget increase for Project Development and
Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) be taken from the Contingency, with no
change to the overall total project budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Backaround
The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Reach A, Orange
Trunk, and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk to be hydraulically deficient and in need of
replacement. The purpose of this project is to provide consulting services to implement the
replacement of approximately 40,000 feet of trunk sewers.
Project Scope
This PSA includes preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) and construction
documents for the three individual contracts. Elements of the PSA include:
• Preparation of a Preliminary Design Report
• Geotechnical investigation
• Utility research
• Aerial and field surveying
• Potholing of existing facilities
• Permit acquisition
• Design work, including preparation of final construction documents
• Construction support services
Proposal Evaluation
Four engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services.
Three fines submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: AKM Consulting Engineers, Boyle
Engineering Corporation, and URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. The proposals were
evaluated and all three teams were Interviewed on January 12, 2000.
AKM Consulting Engineers had the highest ranked proposal based on their project
approach and solid understanding of the scope of work. AKM researched the project and
demonstrated their understanding of alignment and permitting issues. AKM identified
potential construction impacts in the City of Tustin's Old Town area. They recommended
traffic control altematives to mitigate potential difficulties during construction. AKM
emphasized the importance of a project management plan and dedication to quality control.
AKM's proposed fee was the second lowest, however, their proposal was rated significantly
higher than the lowest cost proposal. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to
Provide Engineering Services for additional information.
ALTERNATIVES
The PSA may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal.
G WQIO alMWde OW RePWSIP C 36.7-39 741 AR-P& OW2W dM
Revd m W0o 8 Page 2
CEQA FINDINGS
These projects were included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on
October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. Under this
Professional Services Agreement, the selected consultant will verify the adequacy of these
documents and will alert the District if additional CEQA documentation is required.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-36)
2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-39)
3. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-41)
KNN:joJak
GntdoWNgC^]aO PeP Tw 7.X 7.39.1<1 MVSO a]03[4.Ea
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A
CONTRACT NO. 7-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 8,500 49%
Design Staff $ 214,700 $ 214,700 $ 214,700 $ 214.700 $ 214,700
Consultant PSA $ 360.000 $ 360.000 $ 360,000 $ 222,676 $ 222,676
LConstwetionract $ 2.009.800 $ 2.009.800 $ 2,009,800
er $ 495,000 $ 495.000 $ 495,000
$ 929,000 $ 929,000 $ 929.000
$ 4.025.700 1 $ 4.025,700 $ - $ 4,025.700 1 $ 231.900 $ 222,676 $ 454,576 $ 8,500 2%
n:\wy41aWM720)nekata\736\7-36 budget taCleAs
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Orange Trunk Improvements
CONTRACT NO. 7-39
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE)%)
Project Development $ 5,100 $ 5,100 $ 12,900 $ 18,000 $ 5,100 $ 12,900 $ 18,000 $ 12,600 70%
Design Staff $ 194.600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600
V
SA $ 160.000 $ 160,000 $ 64.098 $ 224,098 $ 224,098 $ 224,098
Contract $ 2,137200 $ 2,137,200 $ 2137.200
OtherStaff $ 535,800 $ 535,800 $ 535800
$ 909.800 $ 909,800 $ 76.998 $ 832,802
$ 3.942,500 $ 3,942.500 1 $ - $ 3,942,500 $ 199,700 $ 236,998 1 $ 436,698 $ 12,600 1 3%
h9wp.elsdeng172dnekeyaV-39V39 budget lable.ele
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements
CONTRACT NO. 7-41
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 8.500 $ 8,500 $ 15,500 $ 24,000 $ 8,500 $ 15,500 $ 24,000 $ 16.700 70%
Design Staff $ 157,900 $ 157.900 $ 157,900 $ 157,900 $ 157,900
E
SA $ 253.000 $ 253,000 $ 111.684 $ 364,684 $ 364,684 $ 364,684
Contract $ 3,190,600 $ 3,190,600 $ 3,190,600
Other Staff $ 777,800 $ 777,800 $ 777.800
$ 1.316,300 $ 1,316,300 $ 127.184 $ 1,189,116
$ 5,704,100 1 $ 5,704,100 $ - $ 5.704.100 1 $ 1661400 $ 380.184 1 $ 546,584 $ 16,700 3%
h1wp.41al ngp20\nekayaV41 Vil budget Iable.xle
PDC COMMITTEE goate To ad.Ofolr.
031r03; 03..0
AGENDA REPORT 'a"" nba 3N nb.j
Orange County Sanitation DI
FROM: David Ludwl , irecto r of Engineering
Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager
SUBJECT: FOSTER PUMP STATION REHABLITATION, JOB NO. J-59
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Direct Staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job
No. J-77, to replace the Foster Pump Station.
SUMMARY
This report provides additional information regarding the need to construct a new pump
station. The following information further clarifies the Staffs recommendation for this
facility.
Need for Replacement
As indicated in the attached Agenda Report from the February Planning, Design and
Construction (PDC) Committee Meeting, previous engineering studies have concluded
that the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS) has reached the end of its useful life. The
reliability of the FPS has become increasingly suspect as the facility continues to age
and deteriorate.
The FPS serves an important role in the District's ability to reliably discharge effluent
without spilling into the Santa Ana River. The FPS will be required to continue serving
the following functions:
• Continue to provide backup for routine maintenance of the District's Ocean Outfall
Booster Station (GOBS), twice per year.
• Provide an emergency backup to operate independently through the 120-inch outfall
in the event of a failure at OOBS such as loss of power or mechanical problems. In
the recent past, one or two power outages occur per year, causing GOBS to come
off-line.
• Provide discharge through the 78-inch outfall during a high flow emergency,
estimated to occur once every 1.5 years today, reducing to once every 3 years when
Groundwater Replenishment System is on-line to provide additional peak flow relief.
It should be noted that the rated capacity of COBS is 480 mgd (at high tide), which
has been exceeded five times in recent years. COBS has handled flows in excess
of 480 mgd because of favorable tide conditions.
p,„W WM Page 1
In the future, the Foster Pump Station (FPS) will be required to provide additional
functions that it is presently not capable of serving. These functions include:
• Operating in conjunction with Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS), at the same
operating pressure, to allow portions of OOBS to be taken out of service for a
scheduled major rehabilitation.
• Pumping exclusively secondary effluent through the 78-inch outfall in a peak flow
emergency.
• Optional pumping of secondary effluent from Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1 for phases 2
and 3 of the Groundwater Replenishment System.
The existing FPS is not capable of serving the above functions due to the following
limitations:
• The existing FPS structure (wet well) is too shallow and narrow to handle flows
required to serve as a back up to OOBS. Therefore, the entire FPS structure would
need to be rebuilt in order to provide a back up to OOBS.
• The existing pumps, electrical gear, and structure do not allow the FPS to produce
sufficient pressure to operate in conjunction with OOBS, through the 120-inch outfall.
These limitations make the FPS insufficient to provide backup necessary to perform
major electrical, mechanical and control system overhaul of OOBS scheduled in 2005.
Additionally, OOBS is no longer a "new facility", approaching 15 years in age, and will
be subject to more maintenance over time, requiring a more reliable back up.
The FPS was the District's main effluent pumping station prior to OOBS coming on-line
in 1990. When OOBS was placed on-line, the FPS was placed in stand-by. Additional
concerns with the condition of the FPS include:
• Replacement parts are no longer manufactured for the aging equipment. Parts must
be custom fabricated, requiring long lead-time.
• The FPS electrical system does not meet present standards.
• If the FPS is left"as-is" it will become inoperable and unmaintainable.
• The FPS foundation structure does not provide adequate seismic support to
withstand liquefaction. The structure sits astride a high-activity level earthquake
fault.
Regulatory Considerations
The District's 1998 ocean discharge permit allows the use of the 78-inch outfall in
emergency conditions, and the Santa Ana River discharge in an extreme emergency.
In the past, it has been the District's policy to provide necessary system redundancy to
avoid overflows to the Santa Ana River. This policy has allowed the District to operate
••e."a. MM Page 2
reliably in emergency situations, and thereby maintain favorable consideration for
continuation of our waiver from full secondary treatment.
Recommended Project
The evaluation report prepared by Carollo Engineers, dated December 8, 1999,
compared the cost of rehabilitation of the Foster Pump Station (FPS)with construction
of a new effluent pump station. Because of liability concerns and the location of the
FPS directly on an active earthquake fault, it is not recommended that partial upgrades
be performed on the facility. Additionally, the operational requirements listed above will
not be accomplished short of replacement of the FPS with a new effluent pump station.
Estimated costs for seismic reinforcement of the concrete channel, wet well and building
foundation is difficult to quantify without further extensive investigative testing.
However, preliminary estimates for the seismic retrofit would cost approximately $5
million with a total structural and mechanical renovation cost of$18.8 million. This cost
would be within 3% of the cost of construction of a new effluent pumping facility,
estimated at $19.4 million.
The Strategic Plan and the 1999-00 CIP budget include a $28 million Foster Pump
Station Rehabilitation project. This budget would be sufficient to cover the estimated
total project cost for a new effluent pump station.
Staff recommends that this project be changed to encompass the construction of a new
effluent pumping station as supported by the referenced Carollo Engineers report (refer
to attached February Planning, Design and Construction (PDC)Agenda Report). In
keeping with this revised project concept, Staff recommends that the project be
renamed "Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-T/."
The recommended project will address deficiencies in the existing Foster Pump Station,
meet pumping requirements during peak flow emergencies, and provide reliable back
up for OOBS during maintenance activities and unplanned outages.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Projected costs should not be significantly altered as indicated in the attached Budget
Information Table.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8—Page 107)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please refer to the attached Agenda Report from the February PDC Committee
meeting.
R� M, Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
Please refer to the attached agenda report from the February Planning, Design, and
Construction (PDC) Committee Meeting.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR.
The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on
October 29, 1999. The proposed revised project, construction a new effluent pump
station annex, will require that a supplement to the EIR be prepared.
ATTACHMENTS
Agenda Report from the February 2000 PDC Committee Meeting
RW,.jak
G:WglegaMgenda Drag RepoftWDC V-59,J-77 AR OMMOAm
a°`e°°, anoee Page 4
PDCCOMMMEE Te nemnywsa.mar.
04031re 00 07J73100
AGENDA REPORT Min Number Item Number
PM OO-o1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager
SUBJECT: EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED BY CAROLLO ENGINEERS
REGARDING JOB NO. J-59
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Evaluation Study dated December 8, 1999 by Carrillo Engineers in
connection with Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. J-59.
SUMMARY
The original project Scope of Work was to rehabilitate the existing Foster Pump Station
(FPS). The current Strategic Plan identified FPS as the facility for pumping secondary
treated water exclusively through the 78-inch ouffall during "excess float' events,
providing back-up to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS)for pumping the mixed
effluent through the 120-inch outfall, and pumping secondary effluent from Plant No. 2
to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System at Plant No. 1 during Phases II and
III of the GWR project.
The District initiated a preliminary evaluation study with Cardillo Engineers to determine
the feasibility of renovating the existing FPS structure. The study which resulted in the
report entitled "Evaluation of Secondary Effluent Pumping at Plant No. 2", dated
December 1999, provided the following findings:
• The District would like to have backup pumping capacity for the COBS to allow
one half ofthe station to be taken out of service to upgrade electrical systems or
perform maintenance, while maintaining the ability to pump 480 million gallons
per day (mgd) to the 120-inch ocean ouffall. Backup of OOBS would require the
ability to pump against a total dynamic head of 95 feet. The existing wet well at
FPS is not deep enough to provide the required submergence for this pumping
capacity.
• Foster Pump Station is located on a high activity strike-slip seismic fault. This
places the existing structure, (including the existing wet well), at a relatively high
risk for soil liquefaction as well as horizontal movement along the actual fault
line. While costly, (approximately $5 million), the structure and wet well can be
retrofitted to provide protection against vertical seismic settlement. However,
protection from lateral seismic movement is not possible without totally
relocating the structure off the fault line.
per., eMM Page 1
• Seismic retrofit of the wet well for Foster Pump Station (FPS) to protect against
vertical settlement, would require that the whole facility be totally taken out of
service for a considerable period of time while the retrofit occurs. Therefore,
there would be no emergency back up pumping available for the 78-inch oulfall
during this retrofit process.
• Construction of a new Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) Annex will provide
a structure that can be expanded in the future (beyond 2020) as secondary flows
increase. Current proposed capacity of the OOBS Annex would add 240-mgd
pumping capacity to the 480-mgd existing main OOBS capacity. This 760-mgd
combined pumping capacity should handle expected peak flows through the
year 2020. An additional 240-mgd upgrade to the OOBS Annex will provide the
necessary capacity to pump the estimated 1000-mgd peak flow projected for
ultimate build-out conditions after the year 2020.
• Costs for new construction of a new OOBS Annex are estimated at $19.4 million.
Comparably, rehabilitation costs for the existing FPS, which are estimated at
$18.8 million. Though rehabilitation would greatly improve the existing structure,
it will still be an inferior structure to a new OOBS Annex at a comparable cost.
• Construction of a new OOBS Annex is the recommended approach to provide
the necessary pumping requirements of secondary effluent at Plant No. 2.
Therefore, District Staff recommends a change in the Scope of Work of this project to
encompass the construction of the new OOBS facility as recommended by Carollo
Engineers. The name of the project will be changed to "Ocean Outfall Booster Station
(OOBS) AnnerC to accurately reflect the change in the Scope of Work.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
As costs for the revised Scope of Work are comparable, the existing budget should not
be significantly altered. However, a Budget Information Table has been calculated and
attached.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8---Page 107)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The original FPS structure is over 50 years old. According to District records, an
upgrade project was implemented in 1963. Within the last few years, minor seismic
upgrades were made, including addition of tie-downs to the walls and roof of the
structure. However, no seismic upgrades of the equipment pads, foundation, or the wet
well for this structure have been implemented. Originally, the District planned the
upgrade of FPS as a temporary backup facility to the main GOBS until its replacement
by a new OOBS Annex in the year 2020.
wow Page 2
Within the last year, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) raised concerns regarding the
availability of backup pumping capacity during major maintenance on the main Ocean
Ouffall Booster Station (OOBS) facility pumps scheduled to occur in 2005. Said
maintenance will disable half of the total capacity of the OOBS facility for an extended
period of time. District Staff, knowing that the current Foster Pump Station (FPS) would
not be able to provide the necessary backup capacity, hired Carollo Engineers to
perform a preliminary study to analyze the feasibility of accelerating the FPS upgrade
project to provide a timely backup capacity. During the course of this study, it was
concluded that the FPS had several limitations (see following paragraph) that would
preclude it as a reliable backup of the OOBS facility during this upcoming scheduled
maintenance.
The J-33/34 project report (Carollo 1993) evaluated the existing FPS and concluded
that the facility is nearing the end of its useful life. The FPS structure does not meet
current seismic codes and would require extensive seismic retrofit. In addition, it has a
shallow foundation and sits directly over a high activity level strike-slip seismic fault
segment that traverses Plant No. 2. Therefore, there is a relatively high risk of soil
liquefaction (vertical settlement), which can be reduced through costly measures.
However, the risk of horizontal movement along the fault (shear failure) can not be
lessened or alleviated through any known methodology without total relocation of the
structure off of the existing fault.
Additionally, the capacity of FPS is limited to 320-mgd due to wet well restrictions.
Upgrade of the FPS for long-term service would require a new building shell (roof, walls,
etc.), to meet current codes; replacement of all major mechanical and electrical
equipment including new pumps, drives, and motors; new 96-inch discharge header to
Surge Tower No. 2; and a new power supply, controls, and tie-in to the plant's
automation system. Four pumps (3 + 1 standby), would be dedicated to discharge to
the outfall system and two pumps (1 + 1 standby), dedicated to pumping secondary
effluent to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System at Plant No. 1.
Further, the study indicates that only the OOBS Annex option can provide backup for
OOBS. The FPS wet well is not deep enough to provide the required submergence for
the high head pumping (95 TDH).
Therefore, with temporary backup, not possible through minor temporary upgrade, the
remaining options for backup of the main OOBS were limited to total renovation of FPS
or replacement of the FPS with a new OOBS Annex.
A cost comparison of these two options showed an insignificant increase (approximately
3%) in total cost for the construction of the new OOBS Annex ($19.4 million) over that of
renovation of the FPS ($18.8 million). With the reliability of the renovated FPS facility
highly questionable, it stands to reason that the project Scope of Work should be altered
to encompass the new construction of an OOBS Annex.
ALTERNATIVES
Rehabilitate Foster Pump Station at a cost of$18.8 million.
R,a,,.. &,area Page 3
CEQA FINDINGS
Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989
Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989 and the Notice of
Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
RW:jak
G:4dg1abMgenda Draft RepndsNDCUSOAR FeW0 .dw
Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
FOSTER PUMP STATION REHABILITATION
JOB NO. J-59
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 370.000 $ 148000 $ 148,000 $ 148.000 S - $ 148,000 $ 20,216 14%
Design Staff $ 1,851,000 $ $ " $ $ $ - $
Consultant PSA $ 4.676000 $ $ '1 $ 30,980 $ - $ 30,980 $ 24,980 81%
Construction Contract $ 2,170000 $ $ $ - $ - $ - $
Construction Other $ 19077,000 $ $ $ - $ ' - $ - $
Construction Staff $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - $
Contingency $ 56,000 $ 2800 $ 2,800 $ - $ - $ - $
TOTAL $ 28,200,000 $ 150,800 $ - $ 150.800 1 $ 178.980 1 $ - $ 178,980 $ 45,196 25%
Forrm.R.A .
Foevlaetl 12I17198
e,
'a
Draft
MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, March 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on March 8, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: Directors Absent:
Thomas R. Sallarelli, Chair John M. Gullixson
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Mark A. Murphy
Shawn Boyd
Shirley McCracken STAFF PRESENT:
James W. Silva
Jan Debay, Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Use Tomko, Acting Director of Human
OTHERS PRESENT: Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Tom Nixon, General Counsel Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Don Hughes Mike White, Controller
Jeff Bower Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General
Rita Seymor Manager
Joe Fournier Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
Bob Geggie
Ryal Wheeler
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the February 9, 2000
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
A
a
Minutes of the Finance, Administration.and Human Resources Committee Meeting ,
Page 2
March 8, 2000
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that the budget process was underway. There are some
outstanding issues with budget assumptions regarding staffing. Blake Anderson will be talking to
the Steering Committee about these at its next meeting. Mr. Anderson's proposal will be to
develop comprehensive staffing plans in conjunction with an operations plan that will go to the
Board later this year.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson discussed an article that appeared in The Register last week regarding the
groundwater replenishment system. He reported that reporter Gary Robbins has spent much
time with staff trying to understand the complex issues connected with the GWR system. He
further reported no telephone calls were received as a result of the article. Mr. Robbins will be
doing a series of articles on the various water issues in the near future.
The Assistant General Manager also discussed the upcoming GWR Board Workshop to be held
on March 25' from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Alternate Directors from our Board, Directors of the
Orange County Water District , and the Rate Advisory Committee and Planning Advisory
Committee members were being invited to attend this workshop.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Gary Streed introduced Jeff Bower of PaineWebber, and Rita Seymor and Joe Fournier of
PIMCO, to the Directors.
Mr. Streed also reported that the bankruptcy proceeds were distributed a several weeks ago.
Four checks were received from three different financial institutions, only one of which is the
same bank the District utilizes. However, the most significant amount of the money received was
drawn on a bank that could only be deposited in Boston. A special account was opened on
Thursday and the money was sent overnight and had it invested by Friday. Because of that
strategy, the District was able to earn an extra $30,900 of interest by moving quickly.
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications was not present.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Tom Nixon reported on the South Coast Metro matter and advised that counsel was wailing to receive
a legal description of the easement which is being prepared by Bush and Associates. It is anticipated
that the matter will be resolved shortly after it is received.
Mr. Nixon then advised that a hearing date has been scheduled for June 8 pertaining to the CEQA
aspect of the litigation regarding the Kern County ordinance on biosolids. A cross-complaint had just
been received which challenges several of the District's CEQA determinations with regard to biosolids
9
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
March 8, 2000
matters such as The Tule Ranch and Yakima Company. Counsel is presently evaluating the cross-
complaint, and will apprise the Board in closed session of that evaluation when it is complete.
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-d)
a. FAHR00-18: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
February 2000. The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee
meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in
conformance with the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
b. FAHROD-19: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report.
C. FAHROD-20: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of February 10, 2000.
d. FAHR00-21: Item deleted by staff
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 12(a) through (c) under Consent Calendar.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-c)
a. FAHROO-22: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program
Report for the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
A verbal report was given by Rita Seymor and Joe Fournier of PIMCO regarding
the District's current investment policy, strategy and economic outlook.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
b. FAHR00-23: Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint
Moreland &Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999-
00 for an amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years
2000-01 and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years
2002-03 and 2003-04 upon Board approval.
Mike White gave a brief overview of the evaluation of proposals and selection of
recommended independent auditors, Moreland &Associates.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
C. FAHR00-24: Consolidation of Revenue Area Financial Plans and Rates, except
Revenue Areas 7 and 14.
Gary Streed gave a brief history of the District's rate structure prior to
consolidation and explained why staff was now proposing consolidation of the
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 4
March 8, 2000
different revenue areas. Directors commended Gary on an excellent presentation.
and requested the same presentation be given to the entire Board as information
only.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to provide the Board of Directors with
the same presentation as information only in order to determine if additional
information is needed in order to approve a recommendation.
(14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS
a. FAHR00-25: Update on COP Restructuring and existing COP Structure
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, gave a brief report on the District's existing
certificates of participation and the plan to update the structure to reflect consolidation.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 12, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(18) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:20 p.m.
Submit tad by:
Penny M. K e
FAHR Co m ittee Secr ry
H:4vp.dfalagendalFAHRIFAHR200012000 Mlnufes1030800 FAHR MIN.doe
FAHRCOMMITTEE we3Ung0ate TOBd.Or01r.
T 03/08/00 03/UJ00
AGENDA REPORT be t i M
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2000
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2000.,
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional
external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian
bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements
as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the
"Liquid Operating Monies" and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The
District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of
the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase
agreements.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and
Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the
last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor
variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
H:Ix AWWiMQlP eTAHWah"% ATHu es ReWI-FOAM
RensW WM Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION it
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term
investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of
posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield
analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,
yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual
holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the
source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may
not be reflected.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with
California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy.
Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted
expenditures for the next six months.
On February 24, 2000, the District received $63.5 million from the Orange County
Investment Pool settlement distributions. The funds were deposited in the District's
Long-Term portfolio for investment. The table below details the book balances of the
District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is
shown by the attached bar chart.
Book Balances EsBmated
Funds/Accounts February 29,2000 Yield(°k)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 24,175,271 5.8
Union Bank Checking Account 337,214 —
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3,328.000 5.1
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 19,565,992 5.2
PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 344,497.416 4.4
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,010 5.7
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,158,124 6.0
Petty Cash 8,900 —
TOTAL $424,070,927
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
N 1xy.ElaYinV IOkianeYgXFFa°(lWJWa„TrtawMf Ptvl-Fft Gtt
Rem d. MOM Page 2
I 1 111 1
District Fund Balances
• � � � � � � � � IIIIII IIII.
\\\\
IIIIIIIIIIAMEMIN ❖.
3333///i
?XOM. e.•oo.•.
!.... a.... !.... .....
:❖.❖.' !❖.❖.' .❖.❖.' ❖:❖2 ❖:❖S
:❖.�.•., �.�.�.�.•,
..... ... .. ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
•2❖:•.' X33M ❖2
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
• . - . .
R
/ 1 .
MONTHLY REPORT "
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 19 February 1000)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $19,652,945
• Mellon $19,565,992
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $19,587,145
• Mellon $19,516,525
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15
Of Index: 0.20
15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $29,682
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 78%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averts a Portfolio Credit Quality; "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
I5.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
1 Month: 0.58 0.43
3 Months: 1.52 1.31
12 Months: 5.46 4.90
Year-to-Date: 1.04 0.87
Commentary
Interest rates m the shortsnd ofate yield curve continued to rise during Febnuuy in expectation of additional interest one tightening by the Fed(e.g.3-month Treasury Bill sates one 9 basis points).
• The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benclunmk by 13 bassi points in February.
• PIMCO's decision to maintain a below-index duration added slightly m portfolio return.
• PIMCO'6 emphasis on corporates and commercial paper slightly enhanced remms.
e'L.1m//MCRI_.Nfl2fFDLIQaNeAPT
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 29 February 2000)
Long-Term Operating Monies(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $344,527,241
• Mellon $344,497,416
Historical Cost: $347,326,352
• PIMCO $348,040,409
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.23
Of Index: 2.37
15.13 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,762,645
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 48%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.62 0.71
3 Months: 0.59 0.50
12 Months: 3.24 3.10
Year-to-Date: 0.63 0.49
Commentary
While shsus<nd interest sates moved higher in February,yields on longer maturities,declined(e.g.2 and 5-year Treasury Note rates fell end a basis points,respectively).
The Long-Term pumollo underperformed its benchmark by 1 i basis points in Febmary.
P16/CO's decision ro maintain a below-index duration detracted slightly fmm portfolio retems given the decline In longm-Wn Interest ratu.
PIMCO's decision to hold mortgage securities added to relative means,while their emphasis on corpamks dehaaed from rehuns given theirweak pMormance.
as,...urx awsvt°i..aensro'..Wr
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ' I
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSFV7511102 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY
LIQUID OPP.R-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 70,927-42 70,927.42 0.36% 0.00
TOTAL 70,927.42 70.927.42 036% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,679,225.50 2,679,225.50 13.54% 0.00
TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,191.67 17.24% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,288,261.00 1,288,261.00 6.51% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 2,499,916.67 2,488,916.67 12.59% 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THN IYR 3,799,3%.22 3,799,396.22 19.20% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 13,666,991.06 13,666,991.06 69.06% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 1 ,737,908.48 13,737,90&48 69.42% 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.AGENCIES 999,200.00 999,840.00 5.05% 640.00
ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 902,664.00 4.56% -3,249.00
BANKING&FINANCE 1,497,145.50 1,495,318.50 7.56% -1,827.00
INDUSTRIAL 1,935,205.00 1,921,446.00 9.71% .13,759.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 5I2,080.00 308,815.00 2.57% -3,265.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 5,849,543.50 5,828,083.50 29.45% -21,460.00
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5,849,543.50 51828,08350 29.45% -21,460.00
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESRU3CEIVABLES 223,959.80 223,959.80 1.13% 0.00
TOTAL 223,059.80 223,959.80 1.13% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS MTW9.80 223 1.13% 0.00
07-Ma 2000 9:09:48 &eeutiw Wa,kh n.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
DCSFV7511102 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,811,411.78 19,789,951.78 100.00% -21,460.00
07-144rv2000 9:09:48 Fs ufhx Wmkbexh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: .1
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE: USD
OCSF07522202 29-FED-2000 PRELIMINARY
LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINAASS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
RECEIVABLES 2,464,610.21 2,464,610.21 0.71% 0.00
PAYABLES -56,352,929.09 •56,352,929.09 -16.19% 0.00
TOTAL .53,998,318.88 -53,898,318.88 .15.48% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 48,256,122.73 49,256,122.73 13.86% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 5,757,755.89 5,757,755.89 1.65% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 10,492,307.22 10,492,307.22 3.01% 0.00
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 56,500,000.00 56,500,000.00 16.23% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 517,367.17 517,367.17 0.15% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 121,523,553.01 121,523,553.01 34.91% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 7,63 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 100,996,298.55 99,455,819.22 28.57% -1,430.479.33
U.S.AGENCIES 53,155,037.57 52,378,963.66 15.05% ,776,073.91
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 25,454,375.00 25,674,040.00 7.38% 219,665.00
ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,593,829.01 3,556,426.59 1.02% .37,402.42
FHLMC POOLS 9,370,079.48 9,170,667.20 2.63% 199,412.28
FHLMC MULTICLASS 8,063,554.83 7,832,457.54 2.25% -231,097.29
FNMA POOLS 955,371.92 942,719.00 0.27% -12,652.92
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 52,625.81 52.510.57 0.02% -115.24
ASS:HOME EQUITY 405,177.61 404,164.67 0.12% -1,012.94
MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 98060.00 0.28% -13,140.00
BANKING&FINANCE 57,699,83120 57,331,822.50 16.47% -368,008.70
INDUSTRIAL 7,126,199.00 6,906,456.05 1.%% -319,732.95
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 5,145,550.00 4,959,550.00 1.42% -186,000.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,309,725.00 2.10% -197,530.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 280,405,174.98 276,862,192.00 79.54% -3,542,992.98
07-Ma-2000 9:15:13 Executive Wwkbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ,17 . S 76, 62,,182.E 79.54% -3,542,992.98
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,569,16239 3,569,162.38 1.03% 0.00
TOTAL 3,569,162.38 3,569,162.38 1.03% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS �,569,16TJ8 �3,5 9,,�3$. 1.03% 0.06
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 351,609,571.49 348,0669578.51 100.00% 3,542,992.98
07-Mar-2000 9:15:13 Executive Workbench
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE I
O SP07511102 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00
DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME i 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT HOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 6-P PRICE RAREST VALUE B TOTAL
_________________ ------- _______ ------- _______ ____________ ________--
CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS
.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HGAT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00
996085247 AAA .00 .00
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 92.462 3,411,191.67 24.95
912395DE4 03/02/2000 DD 03/04/99 A-1+ 3,411,181.67 17.50
3,800,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN AN CUES DISC 5.321 .000 P-1 99.9B4 3,799,396.22 23.39
313384TT6 MAT 03/01/2000 A-1+ 3,799,396.22 19.49
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MIR ASSN DISCOUNT 5.725 .000 P-1 99.557 2,488,916.67 10.22
313588TU9 HAT 03/02/2000 A-1+ 2,488,916.67 12.77
2,300,000.00 FEDERAL ROM6 LN HIS CORP DISC 5.85E .000 P-1 91.093 1,289,261.00 9.42
313396HA3 HAT 04/25/2000 INCOME AT HAT A-3+ 1,288,261.00 6.61
900,000.00 FLORIDA FEE CORP DISC 5.860 .000 P-1 95.492 995,336.00 6.55
34110AC68 03/06/2000 895,336.00 4.59
900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 5.895 .000 P-1 99.061 891,546.50 6.52
98412CWO 04/12/2000 891,546.50 4.57
900,000.00 DAINLRRCHRYLSER DISC 5.941 .000 99.149 892,343.00 6.52
233GEOMI 04/10/2000 892,343.00 4.58
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.529 .000 13,666,981.06 100.00
13,666,981.06 30.11
YLDANAI. YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2
MSM7511102 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00
DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YEN AT CUM" MOODY HAR ET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD R-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ----------
PIKED INCOME SECURITIES
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN HTO CORP DEBB .000 4.306 AAA 99.904 999,200.00 13.15
313dA3RT5 PLTG RT 05/18/2000 DD 05/18/99 AAA 999,84D.00 5.13
475,000.00 ASSOCIATES CODE NORTH AVER 6.296 6.009 AA3 99.843 474,233.25 8.13
046003EL9 6.000% 06/15/200D A4 474,254.25 2.43
900,000.00 FORD NTR CR ME 3 TR 00530 6.312 6.999 Al 100.296 905,913.DO 15.40
345402YXI 3.0201 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 902,664.00 4.63
400,000.00 LEMAN ERGS BLURB HER TR 00252 6.353 6.415 A3 99.363 400,216.00 6.84
52517PMI 6.4001 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,068.00 2.05
900,000.00 GENERAL NTRS CORE SIR 6.425 9.44E A2 101.069 922,060.00 15.33
370442ANS 9.625% 12/01/2000 DD 12/01/90 A 916,021.00 4.30
150,000.00 MEGAN J P 6 CO HTH ER 00043 6.430 6.153 Al 99.546 149,625.00 2.56
61fi B3YBUO 6.125\ 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/97 AA 149,319.00 .33
500,000.00 INTRRHATIONAL PAPER CO NT 6.533 9.690 A3 100.102 506,445.OD 8.50
460146AJ2 9.300% 03/15/2000 DD 03/21/90 BBS. 500,510.00 2.57
500,000.00 BURLINGTON NEE INC NY 6.578 9.546 A3 1DO.B23 505,900.00 8.64
122014AB9 9.625% 06/15/2000 DO 06/28/90 A- 504,115.00 2.59
500,000.00 GTE CORP DEB 6.669 9.213 BAAI 101.763 512,000.00 8.73
36232OA96 9.335\ 12/01/2000 A 508,815.00 2.61
475,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORD 6.620 6.406 BMI 99.511 473,031.25 8.11
31SO74APO 6.335% 10/15/2000 DD 10/11/95 A- 472,673.25 2.42
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL PINED INCOME SECURITIES 4.599 6.866 5,84a,543.50 100.00
5,928,083.50 29.90
TOTAL 5.215 2.320 19,S16,524.S6 100.00
19,495,064.S6 100.00
YLDAHAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 3
OCSF07522202 2000/02/29 RUN DATE , 03/03/00
DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT ROODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MEANT VALUE 8 TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
517,367.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 5.444 AAA 100.000 517,367.17 .42
996085247 AAA 527,367.17 .13
56,500,000.00 GOLUMAN SACHS LP REPO 5.600 5.600 100.000 56,SOD,O00.00 46.49
99366Y204 05.600% 03/01/2000 DO 02/29/00 56,500,000.DO 14.18
200,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL HUG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.633 .000 P-1 99.764 199,520.33 .16
3135807119 HAT 03/02/2000 A-lf 199,528.33 .OS
700,000.00 FEDERAL NO= IN RIG COMP DISC 5.635 .000 P-1 99.561 696,923.89 .57
313396T86 RAT 03/07/2000 A-14 696,923.89 .13
1,400,000.00 CANPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.767 .000 P-1 99.538 1,393,526.56 1.14
13443MP0 03/23/2000 1,393,526.56 .35
10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.769 .000 P-1 98.969 10,292,778.89 8.46
313588VV4 HAT 04/20/2000 A-1F 10,292,790.89 2.58
3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMR DISC 5.777 .DOD P-1 99.312 3,589,632.00 2.95
0222SACR0 03/14/2000 3,509,632.00 .90
2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 5.202 .000 P-1 99.455 2,505,831.44 2.12
34539TC06 03/08/2000 2,585,831.44 .65
6,300,000.00 GENERAL RLEC CAP DISC 5.665 .000 P-1 99.064 9,222,307.39 6.76
36959ED39 04/07/2000 0,222,307.39 2.06
4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 5.869 .000 P-1 98.999 4,256,973.72 3.50
44922ADA5 04/10/2000 4,256,973.72 1.03
700,000.00 DAINLERCHRYLSOR DISC 5.884 .000 99.254 694,776.44 .57
233820MI 04/10/2000 694,776.44 .13
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAM 4
OCOP07522002 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00
DISTRICT( LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL C0ST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
_________________ _______ _______ ------- ________ ____________ __________
14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 5.888 .000 P-1 99.012 13,061,699.45 11.40
90412CDN9 04/17/2000 13,061,699.45 3.49
2,800,000.00 CRA (DBLAWAR) DISC 5.913 .000 90.927 2,769,970.00 2.27
12478JD37 04/03/2000 2,769,970.00 .30
7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.009 .000 P-1 98.682 6,907,055.56 5.68
36959HEK9 05/19/2000 6,907,755.56 1.23
5,100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS MW MTO CORP DISC 6.053 .000 P-1 99.232 5,060,832.00 4.16
313396UP6 MAT 03/21/2000 A-1a 5,060,832.00 1.27
4,000,000.00 IBM DISC 7.234 .000 P-1 99.341 3,973,650.17 3.26
44922ACM0 03/21/2000 3,973,650.17 1.00
________ _______ _________________ ________-
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.645 3.767 121,523,553.01 100.00
121,523,553.02 30.49
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,DDO,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.796 Al 99.983 1,992,800.00 .I2
066365DM4 FLING RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,999,740.00 .50
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LIO MTN IM00615 .000 6.022 Al 99.984 3,498,635.00 1.26
17120QEDO FLING RT O9/08/2002 DID 04/00/98 A4 3,499,440.00 .88
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS .000 6.182 Al 99.991 2,994,300.00 1.00
209111CU5 FL9Xi RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 2,999,730.00 .05
340,811.60 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 .000 6.506 AAA 99.125 332,504.51 .12
3134BSW93 6.304% 01/01/202B OD 12/01/97 AAA 334,421.58 .08
2,000,000.00 FORD MTN CR CO GLOBAL NT9 .000 6.245 At 99.656 1,992,500.00 .01
345392RV7 PLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,993,120.00 .5D
2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 6.219 Al 99.859 1,998,613.60 .32
345397WO FLTO RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 Ai 1,997,180.00 .50
31000,000.00 GENERAL MISS ACCEP MTN .000 6.491 A2 100.375 3,010,830.00 1.08
32042MVR9 FLING RT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/90 A 3,011,250.OD .06
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN .000 5.506 A2 99.677 3,918,366.50 1.42
300425QVS PLTG AT O8/18/2003 DO O0/17/98 A 3,937,241.50 .99
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSP07522202 2000/02/29 RUN DATE 03/03/00
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT ROODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ ----------------------------- ------- ------- _______ ________ ------------ -_-_----__
2.800,OU0.00 GERA DID ETHIC TR 2000-9 PH .000 6.320 AAA 100.000 2,800,000.00 1.01
3833H4N89 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,800,000.00 .30
2,000,000.00 HEELER PINAUCIAL INC NTS .000 6.374 A3 100.548 2,000,000.00 .I2
423328BRO FLTG RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 2,010,960.00 .50
3�000o000.00 RELLRR FIML MIN M 00246 .000 6.257 A3 100.681 3,000,000.00 1.09
42333HLP7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/27/99 A- 3,020,430.00 .I6
4,000.00D.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 6.423 A2 100.272 4,000,000.00 1.44
44181KEA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 A 4,010,880.00 I.01
1.00Oj000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN ME SR 100570 .000 5.326 A2 100.319 999,180.90 .36
4418IR1T4 FLTG RI 09/01/2001 DO 09/04/99 A 1,003,180.00 .25
5,000,000.00 ERHMAN BROS MUGS MTR .ODD 6.655 A3 100.281 51000,000.00 1.01
52517P003 FLTG RT 12/12/2002 DD 12/07/99 A 51014,050.00 1.26
1,700,000.00 NORGAN STANLBY WE 4TR 00311 .000 6.169 AA3 99.953 1,699,517.20 .61
61745EUY3 MIR RT O1/28/2002 DD O1/27/00 Aa 1,699,201.00 .43
_ 7,356,020.00 US TREASURY INFITION INDEX HT 3.697 3.658 AM 99.094 7,332,963.77 2.63
9128273AO 3.625% O7/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 AM 1.289,374.46 1.83
10,622,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.I20 3.533 AAA 94.469 10,343,575.00 3.62
9128232M3 3.335% 01/15/2007 DD O1/15/97 AAA 10,035,063.99 2.52
1,000,330.00 US TREASURY INPLATICH INDEX HT 4.330 4.263 AAA 99.683 993,250.00 .36
912027SWO 4.250E001/15/2010 DD O1/15100 AAA 597,198.97 .25
4,000,000.00 MORGAH STANLEY MTH #TR 00299 5.130 5.466 RAI 95.859 3,193.388.00 1.44
617452MI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DD 04/15/99 A4 3,994,360.00 1.00
2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.391 AAA 59.350 2,167,321.15 .75
912823154 06.3358 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,094.750.00 .53
5,200,D00.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.613 10.189 AAA 116.541 61698,250.00 2.18
912810MO 11.835E 11/15/2003 DD 10/05/83 AAA 6,06D.444.00 1.52
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR HIS 5.650 6.610 AA3 98.336 2,543,215.00 .53
046003MB 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 A+ 1,435.040.00 .33
1,000,000.00 HELIbR PINAMCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.894 A3 97.557 119,730.00 .35
42333HKGO 5.350% 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/96 A- 975,570.00 .24
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 6
OCBF07522202 2000/02/21 RUN DATE t 03/03/00
DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 13.13.50
v..vv........v.v.............v...v....................................................................v...................
PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT NODDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
2,005,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD NTN S.B04 6.748 A3 96.921 2,060,739.00 .70
9124000N6 6.5401 02/20/2V03 DO 02/20/57 A- 1,943,266.05 .49
23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOYBH 5.807 5.702 AAA 90.656 23,352,289.85 8.34
9128275Q1 05.625% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/99 AAA 23,115,100.80 5.60
5,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.011 6.201 AAA 99.500 5,086,402.25 1.79
9129272LS 06.250% 02/20/2002 DO 02/20/97 AAA 4r975,000.00 1.25
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD NTH 5.849 6.776 A3 97.843 3,073,170.00 1.06
81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 2,935,290.00 .74
6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C NTN 5.862 5.653 "1 99.953 5,996,400.00 2.16
63850JD26 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 AA- 5r997r180.00 1.51
494,503.45 FHLAC MULTICL NTO P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.933 99.437 493,BB7.93 .17
3133TO2D5 5.9001 06/15/2017 491,798.95 .12
15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL XTO ASSN MTN 5.581 5.999 AAA 90.656 14,955,300.00 5.34
31364G2VO 5.0201 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,798,400.00 3.71
2,500,000.00 MBRRIL4 LYNCH HOTES 5.995 6.454 AGE 98.769 2,526,725.00 .09
590186XP4 6.3751 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,469,225.00 .62
1,516,650.70 ONNA II POOL #0080023 6.005 7.057 AAA 100.969 1,541,770.23 .55
36225CAX9 7.125% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,531,347.05 .30
7,500,000.00 BCLLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.256 AA2 97.463 7,497,255.00 2.64
079867AXS 6.000% 06/15/2002 BD 06/15/90 AAA 7,309,725.00 1.83
12,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO C011P DEBB 6.062 6.055 AAA 99.090 12,465,625.00 4.47
3134A3EM1 6.000% 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/99 AAA 12,3B6,250.00 3.11
2,000,000.00 BANK808TON CORP SR NTH 6.133 6.274 A2 97.619 1,99yr600.00 .10
06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,952,380.00 .49
52,625.82 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.214 AAA 99.781 52,625.81 .01
3/677CAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 52,510.57 .01
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC HER ITR 00004 6.201 6.203 A3 18.666 1,000,000.00 .35
73317PADl 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BBB+ 986,060.00 .25
2,500,000.00 "LAC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 UT 6.207 6.178 AAA 97.125 2,455o B59.38 .07
3133TEKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,420,125.00 .61
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1
OCV07522202 2000/02/21 RUN DATE 03/03/00
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME f 13.13.50
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD 5-P PRICE NARRET VALUE 4 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ --_-------
405,177.61 GREEN TAKE COED 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.306 AAA 99.750 405,177.61 .14
3935052Y7 6.2904 10/15/2013 DO 00/26/99 AAA 404,164.67 .10
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG MEN K" 6.2%1 6.307 AAA 90.781 4,488,705.00 1.60
31364CBV5 6.230E 02/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,445,145.OD 1.12
3,109,518.68 PALM MULTICLASS CTP 23 A 6.316 6.279 AAA 97.110 3,112,919.52 1.09
3133MR95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 AAA 3,019,653.51 .76
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.930 A2 97.400 2,031,960.00 .70
073902MI 6.7504 04/15/2003 A 1,948,000.00 .49
21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM I BF MTG 6.394 6.918 AAA 93.156 19,860,625.00 7.23
OIN062631 6.500E 03/15/2030 AAA 20,028,540.00 5.03
2,000,000.00 POUIC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.86E AAA 94.644 2,000,BBB.00 .69
3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AM 1,892,88D.OD .48
2,398,413.64 FNLMC NULTICLASS CTP HER 1620E 6.528 7.167 AAA 83.115 2,242,353.70 .72
3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,007,996.79 .50
7,700,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 6.601 5.405 AM 57.875 6,761,244.70 2.44
9128274VI 04.750E 11/15/2008 DO 11/15/98 AAA 6,766,375.00 1.70
25,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY "DIES 6.621 6.566 RAN 99.000 14,837,890.63 8.93
112827262 06.500E 10/15/2006 DO 10/15/96 AAA 24,750,000.00 6.21
8,818,535.37 FELMC DROOP 905-0476 6.62E 7.049 AAA 99.300 9,037,574.97 3.19
312ODDQSS 7.000E 02/01/2003 DO D2/01/98 AAA 8.036,245.62 2.22
6,2OI 060635 COMMIT TO PON15/ OHM 6P NTG 6.637 6.643 AAA 90.32E 5,593,750.00 2.03
OIM0606I5 6.000E 03/l5/I029 AAA Sr645,500.00 1.43
2,000,130.12 GNMA 11 POOL 4000000H 6.705 6.322 AAA 100.844 2,052,050.]8 .73
36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/17 AAA 2.02f,029.54 .51
10,500,000.0E FEDERAL MONK LN NTH CORP DEW 6.711 6.556 AAA 96.094 10,323,075.00 3.64
3134A3TC0 6.3D04 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,089,570.00 2.53
2,000,000.00 KAREN 6 MCLENNAN COB INC SR HT 6.717 6.873 A3 16.395 1.992,280.0E .61
571748AB8 6.625E O6/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,927,900.00 .49
3,000,000.00 POND MR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.921 Al 16.699 2,115,080.00 1.04
345317313 6.100% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/19 A4 2,900,970.00 .73
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE - BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-Feb-2000 -1.70
99366F650 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-Feb-2000 -3.40
99366WI33 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-Feb-2000 -3.40
99366W687 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 0.00
CW 29-Feb-2000 0.00
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40
996085247 01-Feb-2000 450.40
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40
996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 01-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Febd000 -8,146.96
996095247 02-Feb-2000 8,146.96
B 0.00
07-Ma -2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 'I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
CASH TRANSFERRED IN
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 RECD FROM OCSF07511112 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00
NA9123459 PER CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS 0.00
CD 28-Feb-2000 0.00
CASH TRANSFERRED OUT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 TRANSFER TO OCSF0752222 28-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00
NA9123459 PER CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS 0.00
CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00
CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 25-Feb-2000 63,524,590.44
NA9123459 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 0.00
CD 25-Feb-2000 0.00
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 JAN WIRE FEES 02-Feb-2000 -7.65
NA9123459 0.00
CW 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 JAN WIRE FEES 02-Feb-2000 -17.00
NA9123459 0.00
CW 02-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mo-2000 8:57.19 ECe=liw Wwkbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-Feb-2000 -1.70
993661`650 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-Feb-2000 -3.40
99366W 133 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-Feb-2000 -3.40
99366W687 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 0.00
CW 29-Feb-2000 0.00
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 450.40
996085247 - 01-Feb-2000 450.40
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40
996095247 01-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 01-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 4,146.%
996085247 02-F6-2000 8,146.96
B 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCBD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-P1MCO
8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -8,146.96
996095247 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,561,708.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -2.561,709.42
996085247 02-Feb-2000 2,561,709.42
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,561,708.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -2,561,708.42
996085247 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -1,5%,459.56
313394TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 1,596,459.56
B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -1.596,459.56
313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC.NEW YORK 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -2,095,385.83
313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 2,095,385.83
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -2,095,385.83
313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Wa,Ahewh
waa.VW�AI bAAI:l&I1Vf4 Ik1bllUUl PAGE.-
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETYL DATEI COSTi
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO
9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 02-Feb-2000 -9,427,040.00
3133%UP6 MAT 03212000 02-Feb-2000 9,427,040.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO
9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 02-Feb-2000 -9,427,040.00
313396UP6 MAT032l2000 02•Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Fd1-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,30D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 -1,294,667.11
313396TS2 MAT 02292000 03-Feb-2000 1,294,667.11
B HSBC SECS MC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 -1.294,667.11
313396TS2 MAT 02292000 03•Feb-2000 0.00
PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,323.77 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb-2000 -7,323.77
996087094 03-Peb-2000 7,323.77
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER•PIMCO
1,239.38 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb•2000 ' -I,239.39
996097094 03-Feb-2000 1.239.39
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER•PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Feb-2000 -2,488,916.67
313598TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 03-Feb-2000 2,488,916.67
B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00
07-Af r2000 8:57:/9 Eremiw Wwkbenek
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 'S
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000Io00D 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Feb-2000 -2,488,916.67
313588TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
PC WARBURG DI LON READ LLC,NEW 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 -895,336.00
341IOAC68 03/06/2000 03-Feb-2000 $95,336.00
R MERRI L LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 -995,336.00
341IOAC68 03/062000 03-Feb-2W0 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE PENNER 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,6DD,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-Feb-2000 -2,585,831.44
34539TC86 03/08/2000 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44
B BANK OF IRELAND,LONDON 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-Feb-20D0 -2,585,831.44
34539TC96 03/082000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
PC BANK OF IRELAND.LONDON 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,239.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -1,239.38
996095247 D4-Feb-2000 1,239.38
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,239.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-20D0 -1,23938
996085247 04-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 04-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Ma-2000 8:57:79 Executive Workbench
Q JE- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FED-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,280,668.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -2,280,668.75
996095247 04-Feb-2000 2,280,668.75
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,280,668.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -2,280,668.75
996DS5247 04-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MID CORP DIS 07-Feb-2000 -1,198,498.67
313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 07-Feb-2000 1,198,498.67
B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 07-Feb-2000 .1,198,498.67
313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 07-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 07-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00
99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/07/ 07-Feb-2000 2,300,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00
99366F650 05.6101/.02/082000 DD 02/07/ 07-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 07-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
81,928.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2000 .81,929.89
996085247 08-Feb-2000 81,929.99
B 0.00
07-My-2000 8.57:19 amllw Wakbe.6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE - 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
81,929.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2000 41,928.89
996085247 08-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 .3,376,834.67
44922ACMO 03/212000 08.Feb-2000 3,376,834.67
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 -3,376,834.67
44922ACMO 03212000 0&Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 08-Feb-2000 -3,484,619A4
313396TZ6 MAT 03/07/2000 08-F6-2000 3,484,619A4
B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 08-Feb-2000 -3,484,619.44
313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 09-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72
44922ADA5 04/102000 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72
B BANKERS TRUST CP/IPA,NEW YO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72
44922ADA5 04/102000 08-Feb-2000 0.00
FC BANKERS TRUST CPNPA,NEW YO 09-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Executive Wor.Uench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09•Feb-2000 -300.78
996085247 09-Feb.2000 300.78
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Feb-2000 -300.78
996085247 09-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 -8,222,307.39
36959HD79 04/072000 09.Feb-2000 8,222,307.39
B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 -8,222,307.39
36959HD79 04/07/2000 09-F6-2000 0.00
FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31,161.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb4000 .31,161.18
996085247 11-Feb-2000 31,161.18
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31,161.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb-2000 ' -31,161.19
996085247 H-Feb-2000 0.00
FC II-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31,319.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -31,319.17
996085247 14-Feb-2000 31,319.17
B 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000 -29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE DROVER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31,319.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -31,319.17
996085247 14-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 14-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
8,453.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I4-Feb-2000 -8,453.50
996085247 14-Feb-2000 8,453.50
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
9,453.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -8,453.50
996085247 14-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 14-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 14-Feb-2000 -891,546.50
98412CDCO 04/122000 14-Feb-200D 891,546.50
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900.000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 14-Feb-2000 -991,546.50
99412CDCO 04/122000 14-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I4-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
12,900.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00
996085247 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
12,800.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -12,800.00
996085247 15-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Ma -2000 8:57:19 Eeecvr:r: ir,.kbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,255,164.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -1,255,164.34
996085247 15-Feb-2000 1,255,164.34
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,255,164.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -1,255,164.34
9%085247 15-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 15-Feb-2000 -10,292,778.89
313588VV4 MAT 04/202000 15-Feb-2000 10,292,778.89
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 15-Feb-2000 -10,292,778.99
313588VV4 MAT 0420/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I5-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
562.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 -562.19
996085247 16-Feb-2000 562.19
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
562.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 562.19
996085247 16-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.81
313384TE9 MAT 02/172000 16-Feb-2000 3,699,437.81
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 1/
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000 - 29-FEB-2000
OCS&CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAVULOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 16-Feb-2000 -199,529.33
313588TU9 MAT 03/=000 16-Feb-2000 199,52&33
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.81
313384TE9 MAT 02/17/2000 16-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 16-Feb-2000 -199,528.33
313588TU9 MAT 03/072000 16-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000A0 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 -13,861,699.45
98412CDH9 04/172000 16-Feb-2000 13,961 699.45
B GOLDMAN SACHS k CO,NY 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 .13,861,699.45
98412CDH9 04/172000 16-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS A CO,NY 16-Febb2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,361.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOW I7-Feb-2000 19,361.29
996085247 17-Feb-2000 19,361,29
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,361.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Feb"w -19,361.29
996085247 17-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 17-Feb-2000 0.00
Warkbe b
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000moo 01-FEB-2000-29-FED-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,769.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Feb2000 -2,768.29
996085247 17-Feb-2000 2,769.28
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,768.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Peb-2000 -2,768.28
996085247 17-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,0M.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,997,493.33
313384TN9 MAT0225/2000 17-Feb-2000 1,997,493.33
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 IBM DISC 17-Feb-2000 -5%,815.50
44922ACMO 03/212000 17-Feb-2000 596,815.50
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,997.493.33
313384TN9 MAT 02/252000 17-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 IBM DISC 17-Feb-2000 596,815.50
44922ACMO 03212000 17-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-P1MCO
1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39
313384TF6 MAT 02/10000 INCOME AT MAT 17-Feb-2000 1,699,738.39
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
07-Mw-2000 8:57.19 Eieculim Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 73
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FFW2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39
313384TF6 MAT 02/18/2000 INCOME AT MAT 17-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
62,296.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Feb-2000 -62,296.76
996085247 18-Feb-2000 62,286.76
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
62,286.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Feb-2000 -62,286.76
996085247 18-Feb-2000 0.00
FC I8-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
15,121.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Feb-2000 -15,121.51
996085247 18-Feb-2000 15,121.51
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
15,121.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2000 .15,121.51
996085247 18-Feb-2000 0.00
FC I8-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 18-Feb-2000 -892,343.00
233REODAI 04/102000 18-Feb-2000 892,343.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC I9-Feb-2000 -992,343.00
2338EODAI 04/102000 19-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER I8-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 &ecudvelYm S4pench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 18-Feb-2000 -1,697,355.56
313394TRO MAT02282000 18-Feb-2000 1,697,355.56
B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,OW.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC I8-Feb-2000 -1,697,355.56
313384TRO MAT021282000 18-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 18-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
42,725.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb.2000 42,725.50
996085247 22-Feb-2000 42,725.50
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
42,725.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb-2000 42,725.50
996085247 22-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Fcb-2000 -1,393,526.56
13443ACPS 03232000 23-Feb-2000 1,393,526.56
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Feb-2000 1,393,526.56
13443ACPS 03232000 23-Feb-2000 0.00
PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 23-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
71,337.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2000 -71,337.27
996085247 24-Feb-2000 71,337.27
B 0.00
07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Erecu!!ve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 'is
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
71,337.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2000 -71,337.27
996085247 24-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 24-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -694,776.44
233SEODAI 04/102000 24-Feb-2000 694,776.44
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -694,776.44
233SEODAI 04/102000 24-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED[NCO 24-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -3,589.632.00
02225ACEO 03/142000 25-Feb-2000 3,589,632.00
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -3,589,632.00
02225ACEO 03/14/2000 25-Feb-2000 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,507.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 25,507.11
996085247 25-Feb-2000 25,507.11
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,507.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 -25,507.11
996085247 25-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Eeecutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY H) TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 -1,999.073.33
313384TRO MAT022812000 25-Feb-2000 1,999,073.33
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 -1,999,073.33
313384TRO MAT02282000 25-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00
99366W 133 05.560%02282000 DD 02/;5/ 25-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00
99366W133 05.560%02/282000 DO 02251 25-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,729,418.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -3,729,418.27
996085247 28-Feb-2000 3,729,418.27
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,729,418.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -3,729,418.27
996085247 28-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21,961.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -21,961.81
996085247 28-Feb-2000 21,961.81
B 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21,961.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 .21,961.91
996085247 28-Feb-2000 0.00
PC - 28-1`eb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 2&Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00
99366W687 05.650%02292000 DO 02/281 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00
99366W687 03.650%02292000 DO 02291 2&Feb-2000 0.00
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 28-F64000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 -3,799,403.61
313394TSB MAT 02292000 28-F6-2000 3,799,403.61
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 -3.799,403.61
313384M MAT 02292000 28-Feb-2000 0.00
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
258,457.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 -258,457.01
996095247 29-F6-2000 258,457.01
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
258,457.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 -258,457.01
996085247 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00
07-M.,2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCED-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY N TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 -3,799,396.22
313384TT6 MAT 03/01/2000 29-Feb-2000 3,799,396.22
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 -3.799,396.22
313384TT6 MAT 03/012000 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 -1,288,261.00
313396WA7 MAT 04252000 INCOME AT MAT 29-Feb-2000 1,288,261.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 -1,289,761.00
313396WA7 MAT 0425/2000 INCOME AT MAT 29-Feb-2000 0.00
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-Feb-2000 -6,907,755.56
36959HEK9 05/192000 29-Feb-2000 6,907,755.56
B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-Feb-2000 ` -6,907,755.56
3695914EK9 05/19/2000 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CDR 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 29-Feb-2000 -56,500,000.00
99366Y204 05.600%03/012000 DO 02291 29-Feb-2000 56,500,000.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 79
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 29-Feb-2000 -56,500,000.00
99366Y204 05.600%03/012000 DO 0229/ 29-Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Jon-2000 .5,609,375.00
OIND60627 6.000%021152029 22-Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Feb-2000 &00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 11-1en-2000 .9,732,187.50
OIN062623 6.5009A 02/222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 11-Jen-2000 -10,202,500.00
OIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00
PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Jon-2000 -713,346.89
111`011628 VAR RT 02252029 23-Feb-2000 - 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 21-Jon-2000 -899,550.00
3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DO 02/01/0 01-Feb-2000 0.00
PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 01-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 24-Jen-2000 -2,800,000.00
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 28-Feb-2000 2,800,000.00
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
07-M.,2000 8:57.19 Esecull.Wo kbexF
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCED-CONSOMDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST!
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 24-3m-2000 .5,898-67
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 28-Feb-2000 0.00
111 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 ONMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 244m.2000 -2,905,998.67
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 28-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NV 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 -2,376,392.50
9128275N8 06.000%09/15/2009 DD 08/1S/ 15-May-2000 2,376,392.50
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 -37,087.91
9128275N8 06.000%08/15/2009 DD 08/151 15-May-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-1000 -2,397.990.62
9128275N8 06.000%08/15/20D9 DO 09/151 02-Feb-2000 2,387,890.62
R LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 69,701.09
9128275N8 06.000%0 911 51200 9 DD 0811 S/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.0D
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-20D0 -2,457,591.71
9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/15/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00
._ .. ....... ...v.ro
Executive Warkbexh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE II
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000I0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 -9,699,375.00
OIN062631 6.500%03/152029 22-Mar-2000 9,699,375.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
I I,0W,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 .10.161,250.00
OIN062631 6.500%03/152029 22-Mu-2000 10,161,250.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -4,316,057.20
9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 04-Feb-2000 4,316,057.20
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -51,793.27
9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 04-Feb-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,900,000.00 U STREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -4,367,950.47
9128274VI 04.750%11/152009 DD 111151 04-Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DESS 03-Feb-2000 .2,013,100.00
31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010DD 1/1420 04-Feb-2000 2,013,100.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 03-Feb-2000 -8,055.56
31359MFG3 7.250%01/15201ODD 111420 04-Feb-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
-- •• ,nnn 9.17.10 Fsecullvs Wmkbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 03-Feb-2000 -2,021,155.56
31359MFG3 7.2500/*01/15/2010 DO 1/14/20 04-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,392,187.50
9128275NR 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/15/ 09-Feb-2000 2,392,197.50
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-Feb-2000 -72,554.35
9128275NS 06.000%09/152009 DO 081151 09-Feb-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,464,741.95
9128275N8 06.0000/09/152009 DO 09/15/ 09-1`eb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,445,187.50
9128274VI 04.750%11/152008DD 11/15/ 09-Feb-2000 2,445,187.50
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 31,423.03
9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 09-Feb-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,476,610.58
9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 111151 09-Feb-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FED-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 -5,593,750.00
OIN060635 6.000%03/152029 22-Mer-2000 5,593,730.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
340,811.80 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 18-Feb-2000 -332,504.51
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012029 DD 121011 24-Feb2000 332,504.51
B AMHERST,HOUSTON 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
340,911.80 FHLMC GROUP 878.6o64 18-Feb-2000 .1,381.78
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/011 24-Feb-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
340,911.80 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 I9-Feb-2000 -333,886.29
31348SWZ3 6.394%01/012028 DD 12/011 24-Feb-2000 0.00
PC AMHERST,HOUSTON 24-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 -2,008,440.00
31359MEYS 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/0119 23-Feb-2000 2,008,440.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,160,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 66.470,83
31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/01/9 23-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 -2,074,910.83
31359MEY5 6.625%09/15/2009 DD 09/01/9 23-Feb-2000 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Feb-2000 0.00
Execmi• 'i'�rkbench
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST,
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-Feb-2000 -24,837,890.63
912827Z62 06.50016 10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-M4e-2000 24,837,890.63
B MORGAN STANLEY A.CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-Feb-2000 -612,704.92
912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-Mu-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DERS 29-Feb-2000 -2.994,300.00
209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 0620/ 02-Mar-2000 2,994,300.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DESS 29-Feb-2000 -40,178.13
209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 06201 02-Ma-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
PAY UPS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jm-2000 -20.00
9128275WS 4.2500/"1/152010 DO 011151 15-Jm-2000 20.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jm-2000 -20.00
9129275WS 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 154m-2000 0.00
PC 29-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8.57:19 Eeecatiw Wo kbewh
Q _ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLOATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -200.00
9128272M3 3.375%01//52007 DO 01/151 15-Jan-2000 200.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-JM-2000 .200.00
9128272M3 3375%OVI52007 DO 011151 15-Ian-2000 0.00
FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
140.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jaa-2000 .140.00
9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jaa-2000 140.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
140.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -140.00
9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 15-Jan-2000 0.00
FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb.2000 -22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Feb-2000 22.50
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 -22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,932.80 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Feb-2000 -11,932.80
3133117A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 1110119 01-Feb-2000 11,932.80
PU 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8.57.19 Eucaflw Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOIJDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADULOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,932.90 FHL AC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb-2000 -11,932.90
3133T17A4 6.0 0 09 6 1 1/1 5/2 02 3 DD 11/0119 01-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
SALES
CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,585,831.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44
996095247 03-Feb-2000 -2,595,831.44
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,585,831.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44
996095247 03-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-80,065.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 $0.065.48
996085247 03-Feb-2000 -80,065.48
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-90,065.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 90,065.49
996095247 03-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 890,448.00
341IOAB93 02/092000 03-Feb-2000 -990,448.00
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Eeeculiw Hwibeec8
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 8,689.50
341 IOAB93 02/092000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 899,137.50
341 IOAB93 02/09/2000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 2,485,301.39
313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 -2,495,301.39
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 11,961.80
313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2.500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 2,497,263.19
313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 697,861.11
313396SV6 MAT 02/082000 03-Feb-2000 697,961.11
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 1,592.50
313396SV6 MAT 02/082000 03-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Marv2000 8.57,19 Executive Wwkbmh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOGIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAU%OSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 04-Feb-2000 1,745.33
313396UP6 MAT 0321/2000 04-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PRACO
4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTO MTO CORP DI 04-Feb-2000 4,367,953.33
313396UP6 MAT 0321/2000 04-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
-2,298,498.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2000 2,298,498.67
996085247 07-Feb-2000 -2,298,498.67
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,298,498.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2000 2,298,499.67
996085247 07-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 07-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Feb-2000 2,300RW.00
99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/071 08-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Feb-2000 358.42
99366F650 05.610Hv 02/082000 DD 02/07/ 08-Feb-2000 0.00
Is 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Feb-2000 2,300,35SA2
99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/07/ 08-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0&Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Executive a'wkbew6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-53,093.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 53,093.39
996085247 16-Feb-2000 -53,093.38
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-53,093.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 53,093.38
996085247 I&Feb-2000 0.00
FC 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,454,538.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2000 1,454,538.44
996085247 2346-2000 -1,454,539.44
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,454,538.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2000 1,454,539.44
996085247 23-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 23-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.65,536.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 65,536.33
996095247 25-Feb.2000 -65,536.33
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.65,536.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 65,536.33
996085247 25-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
.63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb.2000 63,500,000.00
99366WI33 05.560%02282000 DO 02251 28-Feb-2000 -63.500,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
07-Mar2000 8:57:19 Lwww W.,.,nch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb-2000 29,421.67
99366W 133 05.560%0228/2000 DD 02251 28-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb-2000 63,529,421.67
99366W I33 05.560%02292000 DD 02251 28-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC.NEW YORK 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 2,787,695.55
313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 28-Feb-2000 -2,787,695.55
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 9,788.89
313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 28-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 2796,484.44
313396TZ6 MAT 03/07/2000 28-Feb-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,858,584.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 3,858,584.64
996085247 29-Feb-2000 -3,958,584.64
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,858,584.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 3,859,534.64
996095247 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57.19 am.,iw ww4i7eaah
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00o/o000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 63,300,000.00
99366W687 05.650%02/29/2000 DO 0228/ 29-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 9,965.97
99366W687 05.650%02292000 DD 02281 29-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 63,509,965.97
99366W687 05.650%02292000 DO 0228/ 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FROST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 28-Jee-2000 708.100.00
11F011628 VAR RT 02/252029 23-Feb-2000 0.00
FC OOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,389,062.50
9128275NB 06,000%08/152009 DD 08/151 '02-Feb-2000 -2,379,202.17
S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 9,860.33
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01.Feb-2000 69,701.09
9128275NS 06.000%09/15/2009 DO 08/151 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,458,763.59
9128275NS 06.000%09/152009 DD 005/ 02-F6-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar2000 8.57.19 Exe ww,Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,442,487.60
9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 111151 02-Feb-2000 -2.429,218.75
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13,269.95
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 29,865.38
9129274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 11/151 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,471,352.98
9128274V I 04.750%I1/152008 DO 111151 02-Feb-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10.500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 9,712,500.00
OIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 .9,735,545.06
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -23,045.06
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 9,71L500.00
DIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 02-Feh4000 10,175,000.00
OIN062623 6.500%0227J2030 22-Feb-2000 -10,199,142.44
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -24,142.44
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 10,175,000.00
OIN062623 6.5001A 02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00
&eculiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
00000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,160,625.00
9128275NS 06.000%08/15/2009 DD 08/151 04-Feb-2000 -1,142,017.04
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 18,607.96
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 33,847.83
9128275N8 06,000%0 811 5/2 0 0 9 DO O8/151 04-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,194,472.93
9128275N8 06.0001.08/15/20D9 DO 08/15/ 04-Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,944,373.00
9128275NS 06.000%09/15/2009 DO 08/151 04-Feb-2000 -1,903.361.74
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 41,013.26
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 56,413.04
9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DO 091151 04-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 2,000,798.04
9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DD 081151 04-Fcb-200D 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 2,391,406.25
9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DD 09115/ 09-Feb-2000 -2,379,202.17
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12,204.08
07-Ma 2000 8:57d9 Ereculroe Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 72,554.35
9128275N8 06-000%08/152009 DO 08/151 09-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb0000 2,463,960.60
9128275N8 06.000%08/132009 DO 091151 09-1`64000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES' 09-Feb-2000 2,380,110.00
9128275N8 06.000%081152009 DO 08115/ 15-May-2000 -2,392,187.50
S LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY -12,077.50
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 37,087.91
912827SNB 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/1S/ 15-May-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 5,600,341.80
OIN060627 6.000°A02/152029 22-Feb-2000 -5,609,375.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -9,033.20
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 ' 5,600,341.80
OIN060627 6.000%02/15/2029 22-Feb-2000 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DE13S 22-Feb-2000 2,003,437.50
31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1114/20 23-Feb-2000 -2,013,100.00
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -9,662.50
Eee:w .e Warkbnteh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION RISTRICT PAGE. -36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOWDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 15,708.33
31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1/14/20 23-Feb-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb 2000 2,019,145.83
31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1114/20 21-Feb-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Feb-2000 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
52,499.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Jen-2000 -52,499.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Jan-2000 52,556.92
PDC 57.42
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Jan-2000 52,522.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-1en-2000 -52,579.44
PD -57.44
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Jan-2000 52,522.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Ja0-2000 0.00
PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-39,973.05 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Feb-2000 39,873.05
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -40,496.07
PD -623.02
07-16 r2000 8:57:19 Fttculfw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FER-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-39,873.05 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Feb-2000 39,973.05
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02101/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-39,194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2000 38,194.95
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 38,141.24
PI) 53.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-39,194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2000 38,194.95
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,929.60 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2000 32,928.60
36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -33,473.99
PD -545.38
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,928.60 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2000 32,929.60
36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.34,299.89 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Feb-2000 34,299.89
36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 0610IN 01-Feb-2000 -35,050.20
PD -750.31
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34.299.89 GNMA II POOL N080088M 01-Feb-2000 34,299.89
36225CC20 VAR RT 06/202027 DO 06/0119 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 22-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Wo kbnmb
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG06010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.7,934.60 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Feb-2000 7,934.60
31371HU48 6.500%09/01/2006 DO 08/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -7,769.71
PD 164.89
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,934.60 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Feb-2000 7,934.60
31371HU49 6.500%09/01/2006DD08N1/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-46053.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 46,853.50
3133TCE95 6.3240/a08/15/2032 01-Feb-2000 46,904.74
PD -51.24
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-558.90 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Feb-2000 558.80
302998GE3 7.500%IVOM030 DO 1021/9 01-Feb-2000 -546.66
PD 12.14
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 16,231.80
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 -16,231.30
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 16,231.80
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,822.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 7,822.09
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1" 15-Feb-2000 -7,822.09
PD 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench
Q RANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSLI-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY B3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,822.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 7,822.09
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00
MATURITIES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 01-Feb-2000 899,447.00
59018JBII 02/012000 01-Feb-2000 -899,447.00
MT 01-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 9,459,139.44
313396SP9 MAT 02/022000 02-Feb-2000 .9,459,139.44
MT 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 3,697,194.17
313384SP5 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 -3,697,194.17
MT 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-503,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 501,430.56
313396SQ7 02/032000 03-Feb-2000 501,430.56
MT 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 CBA(DELAWARE)DISC 07-Feb-2000 1,195,025.33
124783B70 02/072000 07-Feb-2000 -1,195,025.33
MT 07-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Ewcullve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: vo
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Feb-2000 1,196,529.33
313312SV3 MAT 02/082000 08-Feb-2000 -1,196,529.33
MT 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,700,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 7,624,155.00
4592ODB85 02/092000 08-Feb-2000 -7,624,155.00
MT 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 10,579,743.89
36959HB97 02/092000 09-Feb-2000 -10,579,743.89
MT 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-Feb-2000 890,636.50
36959HBE6 02/142000 14-Feb-2000 -990,636.50
MT 14-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Feb-2000 1,198,498.67
313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 15-Feb-2000 -1,198,498.67
MT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 13,953,858.33
98412CBG3 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 -13,953,858.33
MT 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 3,691,945.39
313384TDI MAT 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 -3,691,845.39
MT 16-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8.57.19 Evemll a Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4/
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY HJ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 3,699,437.81
313384TE9 MATOV17/2000 17-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.91
MT 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 ANZ DELAWARE INC DISC 17-Fcb-2000 597,728.00
0019]RBH3 02/17/2000 17-Fcb-2000 -597,728.00
MT 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900.000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 18-Feb-2000 897,390.00
02225ABJO 02/182000 18-Feb-2000 -897,390.00
MT 18-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 18-Feb-2000 1,699,738.39
313384TF6 MAT 02/1 8 2 0 0 0 INCOME AT MAT I8-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39
MT I8-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,100,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-Feb-2000 1,086,844.00
63743CBQ5 02/24/2000 24-Feb-2000 -1,086,844.00
MT 24-Feb-2000 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Feb-2000 3,486,048.61
63743CBR3 02/252000 25-Feb-2000 -3,486,048.61
MT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2.000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 1,997,493.33
313384TN9 MAT 02252000 25-Feb-2000 -1,997,493.33
MT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Executive JV kbenc/
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000/poop 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 3,696,428.89
313384TRO MAT0226/2000 28-Feb-2000 -3,696,428.89
MT 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 1,294,667.11
313396TS2 MAT 02292000 29-1`eb-2000 -1,294,667.11
MT 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 3,799,403.61
313394TSB MAT 02292000 29-Feb-2000 -3,799,403.61
MT 29-Feb-2000 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Feb-2000 9,000,000.00
718154BB2 9.250%02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 -9,903,780.00
MT 15-Feb-2000 -903,780.00
INTEREST
LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Feb-2000 0.40
9%087094 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 01-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 01-Feb-2000 553.00
59018JBII 02/012000 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 01-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar1000 8:57:I9 aecul1w Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 2,805.83
313384SP5 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 40,860.56
313396SP9 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM MTN SR 800570 02-Feb-2000 16,240.56
4418IKZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 7,323.77
996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 1,239.38
996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
503,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 1,569.44
313396SQI 02/03/2000 03.Feb-2000 0.00
IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 CBA(DELAWARE)DISC 07-Feb-2000 4,974.67
12478JB70 02/07/2000 07-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 07-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Erecutim Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 44
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Feb-2000 3,470.67
313312SV3 MAT 02/08/2000 08-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 08-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,700,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 75,845.00
4592ODB95 02/0&2000 08-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 120,256.11
36959141197 02/09/2000 09-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 09-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 11-Feb-2000 31,161.18
066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DO 051111 11-Feb-2000 0.00
IT II-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 14-Feb-2000 31,319.17
345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 13-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 14-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-Feb-2000 ' 9,363.50
36959HBE6 02/14/2000 14-Feb-2000 0.00
IT I4-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 002 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00
52517PLMI 6.400%08/302000 DD 0926/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mw2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 45
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF 2146 QT 15-Feb-2000 12,500.00
3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,600,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Feb-2000 600,000.00
912810DL9 12.500%08/152014 DO 091151 15-Feb-2000 0.00
1T 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Feb-2000 99,450.00
81240QJAI 6.630%07/09/2002 DD 07/09/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Feb-2000 416,250.00
7181540B2 9.250%02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 15-Feb-2000 1,501.33
313396TC7 MAT 02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
39,873.05 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 15-Feb-2000 52,140.72
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
38.194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-Feb-2000 2,619.49
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mm-2000 8.57.19 Exeeutfe Wvkbemeh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2000 15,952.33
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Jam2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2000 22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Je0-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 2,208.99
3935052Y7 6.290°A 10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,932.80 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 15-Feb-2000 11,932.80
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,922.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 312.31
31677EAA4 6.200°A 09/012001 DD 03/15/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 46,141.67
98412CBG3 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 8,154.61
313384TDI MAT 02/16/2000 16-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Eseeulfve Wmkbeaeh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 47
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIKILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN#TR006 16-Feb-2000 16,176.79
17120QERO FLTG RT 08/092002 DD 04/08/ 15-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 ANZ DELAWARE INC DISC 17-Feb-2000 2,272.00
00181RBH3 02/172000 17-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 562.19
313384TE9 MAT 02/17/2000 17-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 17-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-Feb-2000 62,286.76
370425QV5 FLTG RT 0911 9/2 0 0 3 DO 08/17/ 18-Feb-2000 0.00
IT I&Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 18-Feb-2000 4,820.07
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/182000 DO 051181 18-Feb-2000 0.00
IT I8-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC I8-Feb-2000 ' 2,610.00
02225AB30 02/182000 18-Feb.2000 0.00
IT 18-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC I8-Feb-2000 261.61
313384776 MAT 02/182000 INCOME AT MAT 18-Feb-2000 0.00
IT I8-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Ereculf a Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: a8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOWDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 22-Feb-2000 11,666.67
3837H3C70 7.000%12202022 01-Feb2000 0.00
IT 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,928.60 GNMA II POOL 90090023 22-Feb-2000 9,200.63
36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 22-F64000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
34,299.89 GNMA lI POOL 9080088M 22-Feb-2000 10,850.41
36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 DO 0"1/9 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 22-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,100,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-Feb-2000 13,156.00
63743CBQ5 02242000 24-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 24-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Feb-2000 10,833.33
3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 25-Ju-2000 0.00
IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Feb•2000 13,951.39
63743CBR3 0225/2000 25-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 2,506.67
313384TN9 MAT 02252000 25-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Eeecult.Workbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 49
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,934.60 FNMA POOL80252703 25-Feb-2000 5,327.74
31371HU48 6.500%09/012006DDOS/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 28-Feb-2000 31,376.04
345397SCS FLTG RT 08272006 DO 0827/ 27-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 3,571.11
313384TRO MAT02282000 28-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 28-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-Feb-2000 156,250.00
9128272L5 06.2501Y.0212WO02 DD 0228/ 28-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 5.332.89
313396TS2 MAT 02/292000 29-Feb-2000 0.00
IT 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 ' 20.00
9129275WS 4.250Ye001/152010 DD 011151 0.00
CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 200.00
9128272M3 3,375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00
CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Mar2000 8:57:19 Encullm Wwkbeneh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT j PAGE: '50
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000
OCSD-COWSOLnurED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPf1OM SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 140.00
9128273A8 3.625%01/152002 DD 07/15/ 0.00
CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00
07-Ma,2000 8:57:19 &se W ve 11':,"A ch
FAHR COMMITTEE m-brg a Toad.
03/0B/00 03/22/00
AGENDA REPORT
Orange County Sanitation Distritr
_ ANCm-a iH
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1999 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly
reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two
funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,"
are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the
District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment
Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has
tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated
revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next
six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase
agreements or derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
�aEmV aul,vyagNn3ObaneFAXFFalY20.roVAar'Auanerylnhp,W pp,lpJOp.px
Ae":ea. Page 1
T
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports
The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment
Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for
reference. Also attached are four comparative bar charts which depict the sector
diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of
September 30, 1999, and December 31, 1999. The Liquid Operating Monies
portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent
investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios
as compared to their benchmarks for the period October 1 through
December 31, 1999.
Portfolio Pedom ance Summary
Quarter Ended December 31,1999
Liquid Opem6ng Monies Long-Teem Operating Monies(%)
Total Rate Towl Rate o
of Realm eendunadcol Resort Bendmark"
3Menms 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.4
Ns 2.T 2. 1.8 1.
Months 3.9 3.8 1.9 7.
12 Months 5.1 a.7 2.3 22
nce Inception 30 Sept 95 1 5.5 1 5.1 6.1 5.
Market Value per PI Mco 30 Sept.99 $19.6M 282.9M
Averege Quality 'AA+- 'AAA'
current Yield(%) 5.53 6.20
Estimated Yield to Mawnty(%) 6.02 6.63
Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) -Flo.0M
Estimated Annual Income 1.1M 17.6
(1) Benchmarks:
• Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index
• Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt 1-5 Year Bond Index
Market Recap
Interest rates moved higher in the fourth quarter of 1999, capping the worst year
in the bond market since 1994, as investors remained concerned that the Federal
Reserve would, again, boost interest rates to prevent the economy from
overheating.
w 11+r..e aaunV maa�evurmrarlmoowanwaneny�.ngmnmmoaao eoc
s-•r v-. +�sse Page 2
T
Y
The full year of 1999 was a difficult one for fixed income investors, with U.S.
interest rates rising as much as 180 basis points for some maturities. At their
November 16 meeting, the Federal Reserve raised the Fed funds rate by 25
basis points, from 5.25% to 5.50%, the third such increase during 1999. The Fed
left rates unchanged in December due to market uncertainties surrounding Y2K.
Rates rose across the entire Treasury yield curve, driven largely by the belief of
investors that the Fed would raise interest rates. As depicted in the attached
comparative graph of the Historical Yield Curve, the yield on the 30-year
Treasury benchmark jumped 43 basis points, closing the fourth quarter at 6.48%
when compared to the end of the third quarter 1999 at 6.05%. Yields on 10-year
Treasury bonds ended the quarter at 6.40%, a climb of 52 basis points from the
end of the third quarter(5.88%).
Shorter rates showed similar significant increases. The 3-month Treasury rate
increased by 47 basis points (from 4.85% to 5.32%); the 6-month rate jumped a
full 78 basis points (from 4.95 % to 5.73%); and the 1-year rate rose 79 basis
points (from 5.18% to 5.97%).
For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted
maturity or duration slightly below the duration index (2.13 vs. 2.32 years),
emphasizing holdings in mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporate
notes, and real return bonds. The performance of the portfolio outperformed its
benchmark by 23 basis points for the fourth quarter (0.64% vs. 0.41%).
For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO continued to use an "at index"
duration (approximately 58 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing high-quality corporate
securities and commercial paper. This added returns to the portfolio, which
outperformed its benchmark by 12 basis points for the fourth quarter(1.37% vs.
1.25%).
Market Outlook
Forecasts from PIMCO report that economic growth will remain solid, but will
show modest slowing over the next nine months. Growth is likely to be stronger
in the first half of 2000 as widespread Y2K disruptions have not materialized, and
strong stock and housing markets will support higher levels of consumer
spending. PIMCO expects the Fed will tighten the federal funds rate at least
once during the first half of 2000 to cool the economy. Thus, inflation is expected
to remain benign over the longer term.
The PIMCO investment strategy targets portfolio duration slightly above index to
take advantage of higher yields provided by longer maturity securities. PIMCO
indicates that they will continue to hold short and intermediate maturity real return
bonds; concentrate on higher quality investment-grade corporate holdings; and
emphasize adjustable-rate mortgages to capture higher relative yields.
rv.amw�ei�',m.avwmziwaa"evnHmrenaoowneiwuen«Mmnne�now��m.ax
Page 3
w
>v
The attached letter from PIMCO provides a more detailed description of fourth-
quarter market conditions, portfolio returns, future market outlook, and their
recommended investment strategy for the District's Liquid and Long-Term
Operating Monies portfolios.
Portfolio Market Values
On December 17, 1999, the sum of$10 million was received from the Orange
County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle, and was deposited in the
District's Long-Term portfolio for investment.
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the
table below, and in the attached bar chart.
Liquid Long-Tenn
Quarter Operating Operating
Ending Monies($M) Monies($M)
31 Dec.98 18.6 304.5
31 March 99 18.8 305.8
30 June 99 19.0 305.9
30 Sa L 99 19.3 271.1
31 Dec.99 19.ii 282.9
ALTERNATIVES
NIA
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart
4. Four Comparative Bar Charts
5. Historical Yield Curve Graph
6. PIMCO Letter dated February 3, 2000
SVK:IC
o-aamuwlwy aumumeenerrwmraxaromuanamnemM�+nw urwaaoc
"8Ne0 1,61' Page 4
Prepared by Finance, 02116/2000. 10:54 AM
OCSD Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$350,000,000
$300,000,000
$250,000,000
$200,000,000
iii � ..• •.. iii iii
... - ♦.♦ •.♦ iii _. iii
$150,000,000 ... ..• ... ... . , ... .........
.N ♦.♦ ♦.♦ ' iii iii
$100,000,000 ��� ` �+� ... —
iii iii iii ': ..._ iii .;._.�- •.•
$50,000,000 iii ...
$0 ♦.♦ ♦.♦ ... iii iii 1
31 Dec 98 31 Mar 99 30 Jun 99 30 Sep 99 31 Dec 99
El Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies
G:\exmi.dta\fin\2220\geggi\FinanceUnvestmgmtprogram
c
Prepared by Finance, 0211612000, 10:43 AM
OCSD Liquid
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification loo ,00
100
90
80
70
06 60 ❑ 9/30/99
50 ® 12/31/99
40
a 30
20
10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dta\0n\2220\geggi\Finanoe\Portlollo short term
Prepared by Finance, 02/16/2000, 10A4 AM
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification
100
90
80
70
60 ❑ 9/30/99
c 50
® 12/31/99
40 ao ao
3436
30
20 1211
10
00 00
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dtaNln'22201geggnFlnancetPortfolio long tens graph
s
Prepamd by Finance, 02/1612000, 10:45 AM
OCSD Liquid
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Credit Quality
100
90
80 --
70
60
.. ❑ 9/30/99
50 43 43 ® 12/31/99
a 40 33 3
30
21 20
20
10 3 3
0 F----VZ" P/ —
A1/P1 AAA AA A
G:\excel.dta\fin12220�geggi%FinancelPortfolio short term
Prepared by Finance, 02/16/2000, 10:47 AM
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Credit Quality
100
90
80
70
60 ❑ 9/30/99
50 ® 12/31 /99
40
a 30
20 18 19 21 20
10
0
A1/P1 AAA AA A
G:lexcel.dtaNnt2220�gegghFinancetPortfolio long term graph
o
Prepared by Finance, 02fl&2000, 10:51 AM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
7.00
6.75
6.50
6.25
6.00
x 5.75
W 5.50
5.25
5.00
4.76
4.50
4.25
4.00
E E
M to N M O N A O N M
30.1un-99 —6-30-Sep_99 t31-Dec-99
G:\excel.dtakfin\222OVeggi\Finance\HistodcarrREASURYyieldcurve
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
• 840 Newport Center Drive
300
February 3, 2000
'b ry N Nmv ewport Beach G92660
Tel %9.720.6000
PAY:949,720.1376
Mr. Steve Kozak
Finance Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Re: Fourth Quarter Report
Dear Steve:
What follows is a description of events in the bond markets during the 4th Quarter 1999 and
an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term
and Liquid portfolios over the period. I have also included a section on strategies to be
pursued in your portfolio during the coming months.
Bond Market Recan:
Rates Move Higher in Final Quarter, Capping Difficult Year
Interest rates moved higher in the fourth quarter, capping the worst year in the bond market
since 1994, as investors anticipated that more Federal Reserve tightening would be needed to
prevent the economy from overheating. The yield on the 30-year Treasury closed at 6.48
percent, up 43 basis points, while shorter-term rates rose 40 to 80 basis points.
The full year 1999 was a difficult one for bond investors, with U.S. interest rates rising as
much as 180 basis points for some maturities. This increase came as robust economic
expansion in the U.S. and accelerating growth in Europe and Asia boosted demand for capital
worldwide and caused inflation to rise from lows reached in the previous year.
The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.5 percent on
November 16, the third such increase this year. The Central Bank has now taken back all
three of its rate cuts from last year, when market participants were preoccupied with the threat
of global deflation and reduced liquidity in financial markets. The Fed left rates unchanged in
December because of market uncertainties surrounding Y2K. Still, investors remained
concerned that the combination of rapid growth and a dwindling pool of workers would
increase wage pressures and force the Fed to tighten further in 2000.
An upward revision of third quarter growth to 5.7 percent — the fastest pace in almost a year
— as well as surging consumer confidence heading into the holiday season did nothing to ease
those concerns. Even so, there were signs that higher interest rates had begun to moderate the
Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Two
Bond Market Recan: (Continued)
expansion. Investment in new housing fell and mortgage refinancings continued to decline as
mortgage rates hovered near 8 percent. Moreover, actual inflation remained relatively
subdued, held in check by productivity gains and intense price competition in industries such
as autos and apparel.
Higher Yielding Sectors Outperform for Quarter and Year
Managers who focused on higher yielding bonds amid general market weakness were
rewarded, as these securities outpaced Treasuries for the fourth quarter and all of 1999.
Bonds that offered the most attractive yields - emerging markets and non-investment grade
corporates - performed best. The following summarizes relative sector performance during
the fourth quarter:
• Mortgages outperformed as yield premiums narrowed in the face of declining market
volatility. Higher mortgage rates meant that more than 80 percent of the mortgage market
was priced at a discount, substantially reducing prepayment risk.
• Corporate bonds - both investment and non-investment grade - benefited from the strong
economy, which helped companies post better-than-expected profits and mitigated concern
about rising default rates. Slower new issuance also supported the corporate market.
• Emerging market credits performed well, as more balanced worldwide economic growth
and higher commodity prices improved prospects for exports in many countries.
• Currency-hedged European and Japanese bonds outperformed Treasuries because the pace
of economic growth, and hence inflation expectations, in these countries lagged the U.S.
The Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government/Corporate experienced a return of 0.41 percent.
Returns by sector were as follows:
Sector Total Monthly return
Treasury 0.27%
Agency 0.56%
Corporates 0.24%
Performance Attribution:
Long Term Portfolio
The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District
turned in a 0.64 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Three
s
Performance Attribution. (Continued)
Government Corporate Index by 23 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part
to the following factors:
• Maintaining a below-index duration positively impacted returns as interest rates rose.
• Our broader-than-index maturity structure was modestly positive as the yield curve
flattened.
• Mortgages enhanced returns due to reduced price volatility and attractive yield premiums.
• Investment-grade corporates aided performance as yield premiums narrowed due to strong
growth and reduced issuance.
• Real return bonds outperformed as real yields increased less than comparable nominal
Treasury yields.
Liquid Portfolio
The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District
turned in a 1.37 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill -
Index by 12 basis point. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors:
• Our index like portfolio duration was neutral for the quarter.
• Investment-grade corporates, especially higher yielding issues, enhanced performance as
credit spreads narrowed amid strong growth and a reduction in new issuance.
I"Ouarter 2000 Outlook:
Economic Growth To Slow Modestly But Remain Solid
U.S. economic growth will slow modestly over the next nine months but remain solid.
Growth is likely to be stronger in the first half of 2000 as widespread Y2K disruptions have
not materialized and strong stock and housing markets will support high levels of consumer
spending. Resurgent economies in Europe and Asia will help sustain growth by absorbing
more U.S. exports. However, several factors threaten to slow growth in the second half of the
year, including the following:
Non-U.S. investors, who enjoy increasingly attractive investment opportunities elsewhere
in the world, could require higher U.S. interest rates to continue financing the widening
U.S. trade deficit.
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Four
t
190uarter 2000 Outlook: (Continued)
Consumers could begin to moderate their spending if the surging equity market cools off,
thereby reversing the recent trend of a declining savings rate.
Inflation Will Trend Upward But Remain Relatively Benign
Inflation increased modestly in recent months as deflationary forces such as falling commodity
prices and a strong dollar began to reverse themselves. Inflation will continue to trend upward
for the following reasons:
• Economic growth will reduce the supply of available workers and heighten the risk of
accelerating wage increases.
• Import prices will rise because capital outflows to faster growing economies will weaken
the U.S. dollar.
• Stronger economies in Europe and Asia have led to rising commodity prices, the effects of
which will continue to work their way through the economy.
While there will be upward pressure on interest rates in response to higher inflation, rates are
unlikely to move far above the top of our secular range because inflation will remain relatively
benign. Several factors will help contain increases in inflation. First, we expect that the Fed
will tighten at least once during the first half of 2000 to cool the economy. In addition, strong
productivity gains will hold down increases in unit labor costs, while relatively low capacity
utilization will limit producers' ability to pass on wage increases.
Yield Enhancement Will Remain Key to Outperformance
Yield enhancement will continue to offer better opportunities for outperformance than interest
rate strategies in a low- volatility rate environment. Collecting premium income from writing
options is one way to take advantage of range-bound rates; mortgages, which offer yield
premiums well above Treasuries at a time when refinancing risk is low, are another.
Corporate and emerging market bonds also offer attractive yield premiums but, unlike
mortgages, present credit risk. In these sectors, investors will need to focus on issues with the
highest risk-adjusted yields given lingering concerns about high levels of corporate debt, rising
default rates and fiscal imbalances in some emerging market countries. U.S. real yields
remain higher than in most other developed economies, giving portfolio managers little reason
to venture outside the U.S.
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Five
a
StratePy:
The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Long Term portfolio in the
coming months:
• Target duration slightly above the benchmark to take advantage of higher yields on longer-
maturity securities.
• Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the yield
curve.
• Concentrate investment-grade corporate holdings on higher quality credits.
• Emphasize mortgages to capture higher relative yields and shift toward higher coupon
issues now that refinancing risk has diminished.
• Continue to favor adjustable-rate mortgages as high yielding, short-term holdings.
• Continue to hold short and intermediate maturity real return bonds to take advantage of
historically high real yields.
The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Liquid portfolio in the
coming months:
• Target duration near the half-year neutral point to capture additional yield while limiting
the overall interest rate sensitivity of the portfolio.
• Continue to emphasis high quality commercial paper.
• Maintain exposure to select short duration corporate issues to capture relatively high
yields.
Steve, we hope this information proves useful, and look forward to discussing these and other
issues with you in the near future.
Sincerely,
IT-� F.
Rita J. Seymour Joseph A. Fournier
Vice President Account Manager
RJS/JAF:ci
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
FAHRCOMMITTEE rnreUreoM Taad.orar.
03/OB/00 03122M
AGENDA REPORT I 1en RDO-23 NumW "�/2"(yp
3 FAH
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: Selection of the District's Independent Financial Auditors
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland &
Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999-00 for an
amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years 2000-01
and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03
and 2003-04 upon Board approval.
SUMMARY
Moreland & Associates has served as the District's auditors for the past 5 years.
At the direction of the Committee, staff solicited a Request For Proposal For
Professional Auditing Services (RFP) for fiscal year 1999-00, with the option of
auditing the following two years at staffs discretion. In addition, a two-year
extension beyond this three-year contract period may be granted upon
recommendation by staff and approval by the Board of Directors. The RFP was
submitted to the following firms:
Arthur Andersen Conrad & Associates
Deloitte & Touche Diehl, Evans & Co.
Ernst &Young Moreland &Associates
PriceWaterhouseCoopers Thomas, Bigbie & Smith
McGladrey & Pullen Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co.
Arthur Andersen and Deloitte &Touche sent letters declining to propose at this
time. Ernst & Young made telephone inquiries regarding the proposal but also
declined to propose.
All together, six responses were received. An Evaluation Team comprised of
the Director of Finance, Controller, and Accounting Manager was established,
and performed a preliminary evaluation ranking on these six proposals. Listed
below are the results of the preliminary evaluation in the order of the ranking
done by staff, followed by the first year maximum fee quoted in their proposals,
and then by estimated audit hours:
�.m,m��.ymW e,e•vuet�u�Rmovzwo Nam•A �uaaan a:
Page 1
r
Initial Evaluation Maximum Estimated
Ranking By Staff Fee— 10 Yr. Audit Hours
Moreland & Associates 94 $42,600 818
Conrad & Associates 89 36,865 700
Diehl, Evans & Co. 82 49,000 570
Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co. 79 43,800 570
McGladrey & Pullen 78 48,600 575
Thomas, Bigbie & Smith 77 46,300 500
The initial evaluation performed by staff was done in accordance with the criteria
set forth in the RFP, without consideration of fees, as follows:
1. Past experience on comparable govemment engagements.
2. Quality of firm's professional personnel assigned to the
engagement.
3. Quality of firm's management support.
4. Adequacy of proposed staffing plan.
5. Adequacy of sampling techniques.
6. The degree of anticipated support requirements of District's staff.
Based on the initial screening, the Evaluation Team interviewed the top three
firms:
Moreland &Associates
Conrad & Associates
Diehl, Evans, & Co.
Each of these three finalists is qualified to serve as the District's auditors.
However, Moreland &Associates distinguished themselves from the rest, as
follows:
Assignment of Michael Moreland as the audit engagement partner.
Mr. Moreland has over 20 years experience in governmental
financial audits and is currently Chairman of the State
Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California
Society of Certified Public Accountants and of the California
Committee on Municipal Accounting. In addition, Mr. Moreland was
the only California CPA who was a member of the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board's Task Force on the development of
the Financial Reporting Model, GASB Statement No 34.
• Proposed the highest number of estimated hours that would be
necessary to complete the audit. This coupled with the fact that
Moreland &Associates was the only firm to recognize that GASB
Statement 34 would have to be implemented by the District in
�wmm+W any.wd•`�u•nr�w+zom.��a•n.w�vuamnn a�
R•"'•° 1A° Page 2
2001-02 indicated to the Evaluation Committee that Moreland &
Associates had the best understanding of the District's audit needs.
• Although Conrad & Associates' maximum annual fees were lower
than Moreland &Associates ($36,865 to $42,600), Moreland &
Associate has the lower average hourly rate based each firms total
estimated hours ($52.07 per hour to $52.66 per hour).
• In anticipation of the GASB Statement No. 34 implementation in
2001-02, Moreland &Associates included an increase of$3,000 in
audit fees in addition to their annual 4 percent increase. In
addition, Mr. Moreland is also offering to donate up to thirty hours of
his own time to assist the District in the implementation of the new
reporting model. Although Conrad &Associates fees will increase
each year at a nominal 3 percent, they do qualify their proposed
annual fee by stating in their proposal that their fixed fee does not
include changes in the scope of the audit that might result from the
implementation of GASB Statement No. 34.
Therefore, the Selection Committee recommends appointment of Moreland &
Associates to provide audit services for the 1999-00 period. As requested in the
RFP, Moreland &Associates also submitted their proposed maximum fees for
the succeeding two years, as follows:
1999-00 $42,600
2000-01 44,300
2001-02 49,000
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The fees for the 1999-00 audit will be included in the Joint Works budget for
2000-01.
Page 3
i
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
February 24, 2000, 4:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at
4:30 p.m. on February 24, 2000. Members of the Committee present were:
Director Norm Eckenrode Director Iry Pickier, Chair
Director Peer Swan Director Philip L. Anthony
Director Jan Debay Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.
General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alt. General Manager William Mills Jr., Alt.
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSO OCWD Others
Director Steve Anderson Director Wes Bannister Kellen Bum-Luchl, Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Blake Anderson Director Kelly E. Rowe Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc.
Bob Ghirelli Steve Conklin Stephen Thomas, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
Jim Herberg Thomas M. Dawes Don Schroeder, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
David Ludwin Jill Everhart Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Bob Oolen Cindy Gehman Brenda Deeley, NCG Porter Novelli
Wendy Sevenandt Jennifer Greedier Johnny Perkins, NCG Porter Novelli
Michelle Tuchman Roy Hemdon Ron Linsky, NWRI
Brad Hogin Clark Ide Ed Royce, MWDOC& Met
Greg Leslie Michelle Boyd, City of Fountain Valley
Mike Markus Dave Argo, Black&Veatch
Julia Norman Andrew Lazenby, Black& Veatch
Tim Sovich Bill Tappan, Carollo Engineers
Mike Wehner John Collins, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley
Ron Wildermuth Gary Robbins, The Orange County Register
Director Pickler introduced OCSD Director/La Habra Mayor Steve Anderson who he
staled will be an alternate committee member from OCSD.
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Swan and
carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held January 17, 2000 were
approved as mailed.
GWR System Minutes
February 24, 2000
Page 2 of 5
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
2. Report on Proiect Development Phase Issues: Seawater Intrusion Groundwater
Computer Model
OCWD Chief Hydrogeologist Roy Herndon and Stephen Thomas of Camp Dresser&
McKee Inc. (CDM) gave a presentation on design information memoranda (DIM) 9a, the
Seawater Intrusion Groundwater Computer Modeling. It was noted that the computer
model, which will be completed in about six weeks, provides a dynamic look at the
Talbert Gap under various pumping and withdrawal scenarios.
3. Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser &
McKee Inc.
Project Manager Tom Dawes reviewed the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with CDM, providing for recent cost containment work
and changes to the scope of work. He stated that the Amendment provides for work
previously authorized by the Committee: eleven changes to the scope of work, and a
new completion date of December 31, 2000. The Committee then recommended the
following action.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,
the Committee recommended that a recommendation be made to both the OCSD
and OCWD Boards to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement dated July 7, 1999 with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. adding $172,649
and providing changes to the Scope of Work, increasing the total contract price
to an amount not to exceed $4,982,950.
4. Electrical Power Studies
Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation for the Committee to authorize the
solicitation of proposals for an electrical power study. He reported the work would cost
between $30-40,000 with completion anticipated by July 2000, Mr. Dawes advised that
the electrical power study will both estimate future purchased power rates and
determine the feasibility of onsite power generation.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, staff was authorized to solicit
proposals for the Electrical Power Studies and to return same to the Committee
for final consideration. Staff was directed to include two separate scopes of
work in the Request for Proposals; one for estimating future purchased power
rates, and one for a provision for onsite power generation.
GWR System Minutes
February 24,2000
Page 3 of 5
5. Brine Effects Study
Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation to issue a task order to K P. Lindstrom,
Inc. to prepare the Brine Effects Study. It was noted that OCSD is doing toxicity testing
at the present time, which may be sufficient for preparation of this study. Mr. Dawes
stated that if sufficient OCSD toxicity test data is available, fees will not exceed
$21,450 and that in the event additional toxicity evaluation is necessary, the proposal
includes an allowance of$25,000 for added testing (using OCSD's vendor.)
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, issuance of a Task Order is
hereby approved to K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. to prepare a Brine Effects Study at a
cost not to exceed $46,540.
6. GWR System Proiect Governance
Mr. Dawes gave a brief overview of the agenda report on Project Governance issues,
which he stated does not recommend a form of govemance, but lists issues to be
considered in choosing between an Operating Agreement and a Joint Powers
Authority. He suggested that this item be reviewed by management and staff for a
recommendation as to the form of governance to the Committee. Director Anthony
requested that a draft operating agreement be completed before any decision is made
on this issue and presented back to the Committee at a later date. Mr. Dawes
responded that a draft operating agreement would be written and reviewed by the
technical advisory teams and captains, the management advisory team and both
general managers and presented back to the Committee.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, duly seconded and carried, the Project
Governance issue was referred to OCWD and OCSD management for preparation
of a recommendation, and staff was directed to prepare a draft operating issues
agreement.
7. Public Information Program
Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation to reallocate $27,000 previously
approved for added research and focus groups to the ongoing public information
program.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the
reallocation of$27,000 previously approved for research and focus groups to the
ongoing public information program was approved.
GWR System Minutes A
February 24, 2000
Page 4 of 5
8. Status Report
Brenda Deeley from NCG Porter Novelli, formerly Nelson Communications Group,
reported the following:
1. Nelson Communications Group was acquired in January by Porter Novelli,
whose corporate offices are in New York and is a worldwide public relations firm
that will bring added resources to them.
2. The final version of this quarter's newsletter was distributed. She noted that it
would be ready for mail out by the end of next week.
3. Introduction of Mary McDaniel of McDaniel Lambert who will be translating
hydrology, technical, and engineering information into information for the
medical community.
Dick Corneille's (CDM) report included:
1. A short presentation on the cost comparison between the GWR System and
West Basin Municipal Water District's "Chevron" Project showing that the bid
price for the Chevron project is very comparable to the current estimate for the
GWR System; and
2. Advised that 20 of the 32 DIMs are presently being worked on comprised of 10
to 60 pages each. Each DIM goes through the respective Technical Advisory
Team before proceeding to the Management Advisory Team.
Mr. Dawes reported that:
1. The name of the conveyance pipeline along the Santa Ana River would be
called the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline.
2. OCSD would be having their quarterly workshop on Saturday, March 25 from
8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and would be inviting OCWD Board of Directors to that
workshop. The subject will be the Groundwater Replenishment System.
3. Staff has received verbal reports from both the County of Orange and the Army
Corps of Engineers that the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline alignment has
been preliminarily approved.
4. Staff received verbal news that the $315,000 SCE grant for the demonstration
work for trickling filters/microfiltration process was denied.
9. General Managers Comments
Don McIntyre requested that more directors serve in the role of alternate committee
members rather than the general managers of each agency as alternates. He
suggested that three alternates from each agency be selected and attend the GWR
System meetings. Staff was directed to prepare an agenda item in this regard for the
GWR System Minutes
February 24, 2000
Page 5 of 5
next meeting. Blake Anderson suggested that each agency come with three names to
the next meeting.
Bill Mills said that he would be going to Washington, DC next week to seek approval of
continued federal support from the Bureau of Reclamation for the project.
10.Directors Comments
Director Anthony wanted to know if everything is on schedule, with Mr. Dawes
confirming that it is. Director Swan asked about the AWi site, which is still under
review. The Directors also requested a DIM schedule updatelstatus report.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for March 20, 2000 at 5:30 p.m.
at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebna Dale To ad.of Dir.
3/22/00
AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe I[emN
C
Orange County Sanitation Distn
FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering
Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Team Leader
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM,
JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp
Dresser and McKee for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater
Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, providing for additional engineering
services in the amount of $172,649 for a total amount not to exceed $4,982,950.
Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District have equal
shares for the addendum in the amount of$86,324.50 and for the Professional
Services Agreement in the total amount of $2,491,475.
SUMMARY
The recommended action is being forwarded to the Board of Directors from the
Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System Joint Cooperative Committee
meeting held on February 24, 2000. The Orange County Water District Board
approved this item at their March 15, 2000 meeting.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: GWR System, J-36, Section a, Page 214)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Refer to the attached Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Agenda Report
dated February 22, 2000.
Page 1
i
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost-effective alternatives.
CEQA FINDINGS
Environmental Impact Report for GW R System was certified on March 24, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. PSA Status Report
3. Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Agenda
Item Submittal
WTS.,jak
GnntglabeMgenda Draft RepatWolnt BcardMR J-36 Add 1 to CDM 032200.doc
»e ear Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE)
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
JOB NO. J-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURETO EXPENDEDTO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%)
Project Development $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700.000 $ 553,345 $ 553,345 $ 400.900 72%
Cesi n Staff $ 2,349.000 $ 2.349.000 $ 2,349.000 $ 2,349,000 $ 2,349,000 $ 180.000 8%
Design Consultant
PSAs $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 2.533,290 E 66,325 $ 2,719,615
Construction(Other) $ 2,853,900 $ 2,653,900 $ 2,653,900 $ $
Construction Staff $ 9,345,600 $ 9.345,600 $ 9,345,6001 $ $
Construction Contract $ 66,481,500 $ 66.481.500 $ 88.481,500 $ $
Contingency $ 12,895,000 $ 12,895.000 $ 12,895,000 $ $
TOTAL Ill 121.925.000 $ 121.925.000 $ - $ 121,925,000 $ 5.535,635 $ 86.325 $ 5.621,960 $ 680,900 1 10%
M Nvp tlla4naVOBa A COMRACTSVdEIiIJB BUDGET TABLE 40038 for AEEmOum I,y14]014 0.
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PHASE
Total Project Budget: $121,925,000
Consultant: 7,500,000
Start Date of Project: May 1994
Date Addendum Description Cost* Accumulated
Costs
Provide engineering services for the Project
July 15, Original Development Phase of the Groundwater
1999 PSA Replenishment System consisting of preparing
desi n memoranda to the 30% design level. $ 4,810,300
Proposed 1 $ 172,649 $ 4,982,950
'The full amount of the PSA is reported. OCSD will contribute 50% of the total amount shown.
14adonXdata1%wp.dtalengU08S S CONTRACTSU-36XPSA Status Rapod.doc 02/23100
Revised 05/14/98
4 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL
Meeting Date: February 22,2000 Budgeted: N/A
Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01
To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Cost Estimate: $172,649
System Cooperative Committee
General Counsel Approval: N/A
From: William R. Mills Jr. Project Report Approved: Yes
Donald F. McIntyre CEQA Compliance: Yes
Staff Contact: Tom Dawes
Subject: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC.
SUMMARY
On January 17, 2000 Committee members authorized staff to negotiate Amendment
No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
(CDM). The PSA, approved in July 1999, provided for the CDM Team to perform the
GWR System Project Development Phase. In October 1999, the Committee received a
preliminary cost estimate that indicated a higher capital cost. As a result, the
Committee authorized cost containment work on November 9, 1999 and November 17,
1999. As a result of the cost containment work, the Committee approved a new project
budget and scope changes on December 21, 1999. Amendment No. 1 adding
$172,649 includes (1) all costs for the cost containment work, (2) engineering charges
for changes, additions and deletions to the project approved by the Committee as a
result of the cost containment work and (3) costs for out-of-sequence work and restart
charges as a result of stopping regular work because of the cost containment work.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend that the OCWD and OCSD Boards approve Amendment No. 1 adding
$172,649 and providing changes to the Scope of Work, increasing the total contract
price to an amount not to exceed $4,982,950.
BACKGROUND
As a result of higher preliminary capital cost estimates presented to the Joint
Cooperative Committee (JCC) in October 1999, the JCC directed a series of actions to
(1) provide further review of costs; (2) find ways to lower costs; and (3) stop all
unrelated work on the project until a satisfactory solution to the first two was found. On
November 9, 1999, the JCC requested CDM to submit a cost proposal to accomplish
CDM Amendment No. 1
February 22, 2000
Page 2 of 4
these goals. The cost containment proposal, dated November 15, 1999, was approved
by the JCC on November 17, 1999. The November 17 action provided the following
authority and limits:
• Continue in-scope, in-sequence work $179,600
• Perform in-scope, out-of-sequence work $48,900
• Perform out-of-scope work $73,600
Total $302,100
The cost containment work was completed and approved by the JCC on December 21,
1999. The new capital cost for the project is estimated at $356 million and the annual
operating and maintenance charges are estimated at $21.6 million. On January 17,
2000 the JCC authorized staff to negotiate Amendment No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with CDM to account for the cost of the cost containment work and
the changes to the Scope of Work, which resulted. These costs may be grouped as
follows:
Item Amount
• Out-of scope work $70,358
• Out-of-sequence work $47,133
• Project restart costs $69,079
• New changes to the Scope of Work 13 921
Total $172,549
Staff has negotiated these changes and recommends that the JCC recommend that the
OCWD and OCSD Boards approve Amendment No. 1 adding $172,649 and Scope of
Work changes to the existing contract limit of$ 4,810,301 for a new, not to exceed total
of$4,982,950. There is no change in previously authorized hourly rates.
DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS
1. Out-of-Scope Work
This category refers only to the out-of-scope efforts for the cost containment work.
On November 17, 1999, the JCC authorized $73,600 for sixteen (16) separate
studies necessary to find ways to reduce project costs, all listed in the CDM
November 15, 1999 proposal. The final actual cost for this work was $70,358.
The cost containment work identified additional scope changes, which are discussed
in detail under Item 4, below.
Subtotal $70,358
CDM Amendment No. 1
February 22, 2000
Page 3 of 4
2, Out-of-Sequence Work
On November 17, 1999, the JCC authorized eleven (11) separate out-of-sequence
work items, with a total estimated not to exceed cost of $48,900. The actual cost of
the work was $47,133.
This work will have to be redone later when the Design Information Memoranda are
complete.
Subtotal $47,133
3. Project Restart and Schedule and Schedule Extension Costs
Stopping most of the work incurs restart and project management costs. The
completion date has to be extended about six (6) weeks; so added project
management charges will be incurred for the longer project.
a) Cost to restart project, including stop and start all subconsultants,
new schedules and subconsultant scope changes: $28,400
b) Costs for schedule extension, consisting of adding project
management charges for six weeks, and delay of the $100lday
possible liquidated damages to after December 31, 2000. $40,679
Subtotal $69,079
4. New Changes to the Scope of Work
These charges include all cost for changes to the Scope of Work as approved by
the JCC on December 21, 1999. These are both cost additions and cost deletions
to the project.
CDM Amendment No. 1 _
February 22, 2000
Page 4 of 4
Phase I Project Development Engineering Charges Add Deduct
a.) Reduction in barrier pipelines, number of wells and number of
easement documents. $56.722
b.) Deletion of laboratories, WPERC facilities. (Work on
architectural character and site plan rendering of AWi
facilities is not deleted.) $266,719
c.) Elimination of granulated activated carbon facilities and
standby power for RO and product water pump station. $24,430
d.) Additional costs for new outlet to SAR at Garfield Avenue,
including piping, pumping facilities, t1V facilities and chemical
facilities. A new DIM on associated technical issues will be
prepared. $66,700
e.) Added costs for sound attenuation studies, now that
canopies will replace buildings for certain equipment. $31,502
f.) Added costs for additional work on influent and product water
plants, due to changing operating criteria. $52,320
g.) Groundwater Computer Model. In order to better phase
construction the model was expanded and additional"layers'
added. Added costs are: $67,778
h.) Allowance for 50% increase (from 2 to 3 per month) in formal
meetings with CDM Project Director and Project Manager. $25,920
i.) Allowance for added engineering costs to protect certain
facilities such as the laboratories and associated utility
services,which would have been replaced. $9,980
j.) Allowance for added cost to replace gaseous chlorine to GAP
treatment facilities to allow use of GWR System sodium
hypochlorite system, thereby eliminating gaseous chlorine
from the site. $31,795
k.) Added cost to carry forward four(4) preliminary designs
(rather than two)for MF treatment to allow more bidding
opportunities. $47,955
Total $333,950 $347,871
Net (deduct) ($13,921)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeb.9 Date TGad.Gr DR.
03/22/00
AGENDA REPORT em"umbe tt/4�m°e
Orange County Sanitation Distri
FROM: David Lud lrector of Engineering
Originator: Kathy Millea, Project Manager
SUBJECT: SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve the plans and specifications for Solids Storage and Truck Loading
Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, on file at the offices of the Board
Secretary; (2) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; (3) Receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to JW Contracting
Corporation for the Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to exceed $10,428,440.
SUMMARY
This project is for the construction of a new solids storage and truck loading
facility at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for the Solids Storage and
Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, were completed in January
2000. Carollo Engineers performed the design. The Engineers estimate is
$12,500,000.
On March 7, 2000, five bids were received ranging from $10,948,400 to the low
bid of$10,428,440, submitted by JW Contracting Corporation. The Director of
Engineering recommends award of the contract to JW Contracting Corporation.
Construction completion is scheduled for August 2002.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 199"0,Section 6, Page 10:
Treatment and Disposal Projects,Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility,Job No. P2-60.)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
GtnpbpMAy tla pan Rryg4UW eaaMY380-OL2a0.Oz
aewea:remsa Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In February 1998, the Board of Directors awarded a Professional Services
Agreement to Carollo Engineers for the design of a solids storage and truck
loading facility at Plant No. 2. The Engineer's estimate is $12,500,000 and is
within the current project budget adopted for FY 1999-2000. Because the
Engineers estimate is not greater than the approved construction budget, Board
approval of the plans and specifications was not required prior to advertising the
project for bids. Staff did, however, provide the PDC Committee with a project
update in December 1999 before advertising for bids.
On March 7, 2000, five bids were received ranging from $10,948,400 to the low
bid of$10,428,440, submitted by JW Contracting Corporation. The Director of
Engineering recommends award of the contract to JW Contracting Corporation.
Construction completion is scheduled for August 2002.
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are proposed; recommendation is to award to the lowest
responsive bidder.
CEQA FINDINGS
Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of
Determination filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Budget Information Table
2) Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
3) Bid Summary
KTM:
G^ntglobaPAgenda D2/t Repro %Joint 8ods\P2-60-032200.dm
G Nlyma�gpYLL'9 p/1 Re{vYbWll BOYEsYl�.OR3W hY
n.wee:axm Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADNG FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-60
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJF_C7(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT!- `':DUDG ET ` REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET '.BUDGET INCREASE , `.BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ - $ - IS - $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
Design Staff $ 290.000 $ 313,000 $ - $ 313.000 $ 313.000 $ - $ 313,000 $ 240.000 77%
Consultant PSA $ 482.000 $ 1.115.000 $ - $ 1.115,000 $ 862.885 $ - $ 882,885 $ 726.592 82%
Construction Contract $ 2,970.000 $ 12.500,000 $ $ 12.500.000 $ - $ 10.428.440 $ 10.428,440 $ 0%
Construction (Other) $ 250,000 $ 340,000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 340.000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 0%
Construction Staff $ 998,000 $ 1,123,600 $ $ 1,123,600 $ 1,093,150 $ - $ 1,093,150 $ 0%
Contingency $ - $ 2,933.300 $ $ 2.933,300 $ - $ - 1 $ - 0%
TOTAL $ 4.990.000 $ 18.324.900 $ - $ 18.324.900 '�. $ 2.629,035 $ 10,428,440 $ 13,057,475 1 $ 966,592 7%
in vp dudengUors connassenidgel table MAR21)(MBoar0
Form Revised 12117911
March 7, 2000
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 1,2,3, &4
BID TABULATION
SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-60
Engineer's Estimate: $12,500,000 Construction Contract Budget: $12,500,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. J.W. Contracting Corporation $ 10,428,440
2. Kiewit Pacific Company $ 10,488,000
3. J. F. Shea $ '10,533,434
4. Margate Construction $ 10,802,908
5. C.W. Roan $ 10,948,400
6. $
7. $
8. $
9. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid
is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to J.W. CONTRACTING CORP. in
the bid amount of$10,428,440 as the lowest and best bid.
'Corrected amount. J.F. Shea's incorrect total was $10,533,534.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
H1wp.dtatengWBS&CONTRACTST2-801P2-80 Bid Tab.dw
Revised 05119198
OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 • (714) 962-2411
BID SUMMARY
Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60
J.W.CONTMCTING COMPANY KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY J.F.SHEA
Item App—Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Pace Pace Price Price Price Pace
1 1 Lump Sum $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 35.000.00 $ 35,000.00
2 1 Lump Sum $ 7,441,000.00 $ 7,441,000.00 $7,993,240.00 $ 7,993,240.00 $7,752,834.00 $ 7,752,834.00
3 1 Lump Sum $ 2.452.000.00 $ 2.452.000.00 $2,100.000.00 $ 2,100,000.00 $2.186.000.00 $ 2,186,000.00
4 11'800 OF $ 25.00 $ 295,000.00 $ 18.00 $ 212,400.00 $ 30.00 $ 354.000.00
5 3,020 OF $ 22.00 $ 66.440.00 $ 18.00 $ 54,360.00 $ 30.00 $ 90.600.00
6 1 Lump Sum $ 9,000.00 $ 9.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,D00.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,D00.00
7 1 Lump Sum $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000.00 $ 40.000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.D0 $ 45.000.00
Be. 1 Lump Sum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,0D0.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00
8b. 1 Lump Sum $ 10.000.001 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
8c. 24 FA $ 1.000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 24.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 24.000.00
ad. 8 FA $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00
86. 1 Lump Sum $ 1.000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
$ 10,383,440.6oi $ 10,475,000.00. $`110,528,434.00
A.Total of Bid Items 1-8 Inclusive 1$-10,383;440:00i $'._10,475.000.00' $.'10,526,434.00
u are s :..
All Risk 1 Lump Sum $ 45,000.00 !$ '45,000.00 $ 13,00000 $ '. 13,000.00. $ 5,000.00 .$ 5,000.00
Lump Sum Base Bid(Total Amount A 8 e) 4 10,428.440.00- $ 10,488,000.00, :$ 10,533,434.00
Add(*)or Delete W for Alternate $ 6D0,000.00 i$:,-i G00;000:00 $ 600,000.00 $.:�,t 60b.oao+& $ 706.839.00 706;839f00
Adjusted Bid if Alternate Selected $,11,028,440.00 '$ 11',088,000.00 :$.10,538,434.00
TOTAL ADJUSTED BID :$. 10,428;44(N00J $�.`10;488,000.00' $'10.533.434.00
J.W.CONTRACTING COMPANY KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY J.F.SHEA
-CddeCled amdeM J F.SM1ea's inepfeCl Iola)was 11 g,53J,5b.
H kwp dialengriormvlSid D %P280 Base Bid Summary 1 Of 2 03/08/2000
BID SUMMARY
Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. C.W.ROEN CONSTRUCTION CO.
Item Approx Oty Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price
1 1 Lump Sum $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 25,000.00 S 25,000.00
2 1 Lump Sum $ 7,837,000.00 $ 7,837,600.00 $7,992,000.00 $ 7,992,000.00
3 1 Lump Sum $ 2,500,000.DO $ 2,500,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00
4 11.800 OF $ 19.40 $ 228.920.00 $ 20.00 $ 236,ODO.00
5 3,020 OF $ 19.40 S 58,588.00 $ 20.00 $ 60,400.00
6 1 Lump Sum $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
7 1 Lump Sum 3 42,800.00 S 42,800.00 $ 50.000.00 S 50,000.00
Be. 1 Lump Sum $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00
80. 1 Lump Sum $ 10,000.00 3 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
8c. 24 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 1,D00.00 $ 24,000.00
8d. B F $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00
se. 1 LumpSum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1000.00
50m ( L$716,752,908:00 $ 10,923,400.00
A.Total of Bid Items 1-8 Inclusive L$a1A752,968`,00 $; 10,9231400.00
u ers M
AIIRisk 1 Lump Sum $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000.OU $ 25,000.00
Lump Sum Base Bid(Total Amount A&B $. 10,946,400.00
dtl(+1rDeletet.1forAlternateAdlusted Bid if Alternate Selected $ 10,948,400.00
TOTAL ADJUSTED BID $ 10,948,400.00
MIIRGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. C.W.ROEN CONS TRUCTION CO.
N9wp.dtaa,n,Vi si8id D XP2-63 ease Bid Semma,y 2 Of 2 03/08/2000
F
CDM Amendment No. 1 a
February 22, 2000
Page 5 of 4
PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS
November 9, November 17, December 21, 1999 and January 17, 2000.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeng Dace TO Bd of Elm
031i2/a0
AGENDA REPORT iremNumber "em/N6be,
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION OF, AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE
USER FEE RATE FOR, REVENUE AREAS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 AND 13
(REVENUE AREAS 7 AND 14 TO CONTINUE CURRENT REVENUE
PROGRAM)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
The General Manager recommends rate and financial consolidation when the Directors
have sufficient information to decide.
SUMMARY
At the last FAHR Committee meeting the Directors agreed that the proposal had merit
and should be pursued. They directed staff to present information to the Board, in lieu
of a weekend workshop, in order to determine if additional information was required.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Minimal costs, other than staff time. Financial and rate consolidation results in overall
lower user fees.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the
recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our service
paradigm to a regional focus and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a
basic change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically,
this change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate
Revenue Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one
user fee rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee
structure, and Revenue Area 14 would continue to be funded by the existing contracts
with the Irvine Ranch Water District.
v w auv �,a¢ne�nxRsanrmoovnaneoamriotoo.aimuo..mc
R¢vi5¢E' PR098 Page 1
There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy.
• Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified
• Auditing is simplified
• Issuing long-term financing is simplified
• Staffing and financing costs are reduced
• Establishing sewer service fees is simplified
There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into
consideration.
• Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers.
• Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users.
• Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRW D and receives no property tax or user fees
directly from property owners.
• Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid "cash"for most of their
share of facilities.
• Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets.
See attached Staff Report.
ALTERNATIVES
Some Directors may agree that the annual sewer service user fee in RA 1 is higher than
may be appropriate, but may not yet be willing to consolidate the fees. A potential
alternative is for the other RA's to compensate RA 1 for the assessed value and
property tax lost to regional governmental tax-exempt properties.
In order for the average assessed value per EDU in RA 1 to equal the average,
$3,563,463,200 would need to be added to the RA 1 assessed value. At the equivalent
tax rate in RA 1, that additional value would generate $983,337. Using the assessed
value per capita method, the additional property taxes would be $1,861,197. If RA 1
had additional revenues of this amount, the 1999-2000 annual user fee for a SFR could
have been reduced from $110.04 to $84.70.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Staff Report with exhibits.
R+ro.duun�+muene�nRmrena000uunewdR"casamdw,.aac
Re.+ved MOM Page 2
March 15, 2000
STAFF REPORT
Proposed Rate Structure
In 1947 a blue-ribbon panel recommended the creation of individual Sanitation Districts
to serve all of Orange County. In 1954 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 joined together to own and operate treatment and disposal
facilities. Between 1954 and 1979 these Districts established annual budgets and
property tax rates in order to provide necessary sewage collection treatment and
disposal services. The individual property tax rates were a function of both financial
need and property assessed valuation.
The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 changed the funding process. No longer were
the Districts able to establish property tax rates sufficient to meet their needs. In fact,
the Districts had no control over property tax rates. Additionally, assessed values were
reduced for many parcels and future assessed value growth was limited.
In 1979, in an effort to develop a permanent tax allocation method to implement
Proposition 13, the State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 8. Basically, AB 8 allocates
the total "1% basic levy" collected within the County, adjusted first for redevelopment
agencies, to each of the taxing agencies in the same ratios as those agencies received
property taxes in 1979-80. Since both the ratios and the 1% rate are fixed, the only
property tax variable is assessed value.
Because the various Sanitation Districts had a pay-as-you-go philosophy and differing
capital and operating funding needs in the late 1970's, they had differing property tax
rates. The result of all of this is differing "effective tax rates" in each of the current
Revenue Areas as follows:
R/A 1998-99 AV Effective Tax Rate Tax Allocation
1 $ 6,513,664,662 .00027595 $1,797,414
2 35,082,620,856 .00028162 9,879,842
3 33,838,165,681 .00031991 10,825321
5 10.871,149,227 .00026484 2.879.152
6 5.934,887,167 .00022281 1,322,326
7 16.034,002,091 .00019568 3,137 591
11 9,021,892,230 .00024819 2.239,175
13 2,796,831.476 0 0
14 14,495,514,969 0 0
OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 2
March 15, 2000
"Supplemental" User Fees
In 1979 the Board of Directors adopted a Revenue Program. Such a program was a
requirement of the Federal Clean Water Act and of the Districts' participation in the
Clean Water Grant program. The Revenue Program provided that property taxes would
continue to be the basic revenue source for the Districts. All industrial users and large
commercial users would pay an additional charge based upon their actual quantity and
strength of sewage discharged to our system. Finally, as property tax and other
revenues became insufficient to fund the costs of operating, maintaining, rehabilitating
and constructing necessary sewerage facilities, a"supplemental" user fee was
authorized for all users.
The need for these supplemental user fees did not arise in each of the Districts at the
same time or in the same magnitude. The following schedule indicates the initiation
date and rate, the current rate, and the 1999-2000, if the proposal had been in effect.
The amounts shown are the annual rates for a single-family residence; different rates
are charged for multi-family and for non-residential users.
District or Proposed
Revenue Implementation Initial 1999.2000 1999-2000
Area Date SFR Rate SFR Rate Rate
1 1984 $26.40 $110.04 $76.00
2 1990 55.00 76.00 76.00
3 1989 30.36 76.00 76.00
5 1982 26.40 87.50 76.00
6 1983 26.40 80.00 76.00
7 1991 40.00 66.00 76.00
11 1988 26A %00 76.00
13 1985 70.00 100.00 76.00
14 1 WA WA I WA I WA
Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the
recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our focus to
a regional viewpoint and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a basic
change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically,this
change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate Revenue
Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one user fee
rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee structure
while other issues are resolved over the next year or two. Revenue Area 14 would
continue to be funded by existing contracts with the Irvine Ranch Water District.
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 3
March 15, 2000
There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy.
• Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified
• Auditing is simplified
• Issuing long-term financing is simplified
• Staffing and financing costs are reduced
• Establishing sewer service fees is simplified
There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into
consideration.
• Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers.
• Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users.
• Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRWD and receives no property tax or user fees
directly from property owners.
• Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid 'bash"for most of their
share of facilities.
• Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets.
Issues
Outstanding Debt
All of the Revenue Areas have issued some certificates of participation (COPS)to pay
for collection and treatment facilities. The annual principal and interest payments are
made from property taxes. User fees are used for some of the COP service in Revenue
Area 1, and for all of it in Revenue Areas 13 and 14.
The outstanding CON in Revenue Areas 13 and 14 amount to $1,998,245. This debt
could be sold to the District thereby taking it off the books of RA 13 and 14, along with
an equal amount of cash, and puffing it on the books of the District. In this manner the
current debt service of the District would continue to be paid from property taxes. Since
Revenue Areas 13 and 14 receive no property taxes and would have no outstanding
COPS, they would not be participating.
Future COPs would be issued by the District, and principal and interest payments would
be made from future user fees.
Cash Reserves and Net Assets
While we all prefer to measure our economic or financial position by considering our
cash and other assets, a more proper measure for the District would be net assets. In
our case, net assets is the sum of our cash reserves and fixed assets, less the sum of
accumulated depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities. The distribution of net
assets is shown in the following table:
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 4
March 15, 2000
R/A NET ASSETS
Total Per Per$100
R/A Net Assets Capita Per MGD Per EDU 1947
AV
1 $35,927 871 $ 159 $10 $ 494 $55
2 263,057,403 426 26 984 75
3 265 754.909 371 27 945 79
5 65 881 509 1,264 53 2,361 61
6 43 303,875 403 33 993 73
7 97,507 794 614 30 953 61
11 62853,871 532 31 1,232 70
13 21 1414,474 758 55 2,573 2
AVG I $422 $27 li $1,001 $3,865 $72
Prooertv Taxes
We have previously discussed the differing shares of the property tax basic levy
allocated to the individual Revenue Areas. One additional consideration is the total
amount of the 1% basic levy. This tax levy is a result of Proposition 13, which limited
the total basic property tax within the State to 1% of the assessed value. The base year
assessed value was established as the value in 1975, thus removing four years of
increased value from the tax roll.
The District's service area includes a wide variety of property development, use, and
value. There are very high value properties and very low value properties. There are
properties with the 1975 value and there are properties developing and selling today.
There are even properties with no assessed value. Whatever the assessed value,the
District receives an average of 2.7% of the 1% basic levy. That is $27 a year for an
assessed value of$100,000.
Revenue Area 1 has the majority of the parcels with no assessed valuation, and which
pay no property taxes. This is because the County seat and several State and Federal
facilities are located in that area. It also has a concentration of some of the older homes
and businesses in the County. The average assessed value in RA 1 is less than half of
the average value per capita in RA 2-13, and only 64% of the average value per EDU.
Clearly RA 1 receives a disproportionately low share of the property tax, because of this
low assessed value, while providing a disproportionately large share of regional
services such as courts, jails and county administration for our service area.
Revenue Area 7
Revenue Area 7 includes parts of the cities of Tustin, Irvine, Orange, Newport Beach
and Santa Ana, as well as some major unincorporated areas. In 1986, the District took
over the responsibility for local sewer service from the Seventh and Seventieth Sewer
Maintenance Districts which were administered by the County. This action made then
District 7 unique amongst the Sanitation Districts; it became the only District (Revenue
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 5
March 15, 2000
Area) that is responsible for maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of local
sewers.
Local sewers are generally owned and operated by a city, sanitary district or water
district. This is the case in all of the other Revenue Areas and in some parts of
Revenue Area 7. The areas generally and loosely described as City of Tustin, Irvine
Business Center, and unincorporated areas comprise the former Sewer Maintenance
Districts. In these area, which includes the Tustin Air Base, Revenue Area 7 is
responsible for approximately 200 miles of local, small-diameter sewers. There are
several issues to be resolved involving these local sewers.
Ultimately these local sewers will need to be rehabilitated or repaired. A 1998 review by
RW Beck, an engineering firm, projected costs of$40 million between 2038 and 2040
without regard for inflation. Currently, these projected costs have not been included in
the adopted annual sewer service user fees. In order to have these funds available
when needed, an additional $9 would need to be added to the current annual SFR user
fee. The impact on fees, if the funds are not accumulated in advance, would be an
additional $185 per SFR in the first year, decreasing to $117 and $78 in the following
years.
Much of these former Sewer Maintenance Districts receive water service from the Irvine
Ranch Water District. This includes all of the Irvine Business Center, parts of Tustin,
and unincorporated areas. Additionally, the Tustin Air Base is scheduled to be served
by the IRWD. The IRWD has proposed that local sewer service responsibilities be
transferred from Revenue Area 7 to the IRWD wherever IRWD provides water service.
This would be consistent with the rest of the IRWD service area and with Revenue Area
14.
One of the reasons the Sanitation Districts assumed this local service responsibility in
1986 was to protect the property taxes. Approximately 48% and 67% of the property
taxes would have been diverted to the Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF), if
the Sewer Maintenance Districts remained intact or if responsibilities were transferred to
the cities. Staff has been able to reconstruct the property tax, user fee, and local sewer
maintenance costs since 1986, but is still researching the allocation of joint works
treatment operations and capital improvements. Preliminary estimates indicate there
may be some residual funds available to begin to fund the rehabilitation and
replacement needs discussed earlier. Of course, if the local sewer responsibilities were
transferred to IRWD, then the accumulated funds and future taxes would be transferred
along with the fixed assets.
While these local sewer related issues are being discussed, negotiated and resolved,
staff recommends that Revenue Area 7 be excluded from the proposed consolidation of
assets, liabilities and user fees. Once these issues are resolved and Revenue Area 7 is
like the rest of the District, or there is a method to fund and account for local sewer
rehabilitation and replacement, it will be appropriate to reconsider the final step of
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 6
March 15, 2000
consolidation. Many believe that recent actions and current proposals at the USEPA
will ultimately require the OCSD to assume responsibility for all local sewers.
Revenue Area 14
The Irvine Ranch Water District provides local sewer service to all of Revenue Area 14.
There are several agreements and contracts dating back to 1985 that contain the details
of the IRW D connection to the District. In the simplest of terms, the IRWD is billed
directly for the Revenue Area 14 share of operating, maintenance, capital improvement,
and certificate of participation costs. Treatment plant O&M and capital costs are based
upon actual flows. Neither the alternative nor the proposal is expected to change any of
the provisions of the existing agreements. Neither the alternative nor the proposal
includes collecting Revenue Area 14 user fees on the property tax bill.
Alternative Proposal
Some Directors may agree that the annual sewer service user fee in RA 1 is higher than
may be appropriate, but are not yet willing to consolidate the fees. A potential
alternative is for the other RA's to compensate RA 1 for the assessed value and
property tax lost to regional governmental tax-exempt properties.
In order for the average assessed value per EDU in RA 1 to equal the average,
$3,563,463,200 would need to be added to the RA 1 assessed value. At the equivalent
tax rate in RA 1, that additional value would generate$983,337. Using the assessed
value per capita method, the additional property taxes would be $1,861,197. If RA 1
had additional revenues of this amount, the SFR annual user fee could be reduced from
$110.04 to $84.70 as shown in the following table.
1999-2000 Prop Tax Revised
RAfl281,300
SFR Rate Reimb/EDU 3FR RATE
1 $110.04 25.64 $84.70
2 76.00 2.13 78.13
3 76.00 2.13 78.135 87.50 2.13 89.636 80.00 2.13 82.137 66.00 2.13 68.1311 90.00 2.13 92.13
13 8.400 100.00 2.13 102.13
14• 23,800 84.03 2.13 86.126
'RA 14 EDU and Rate are estimated from average daily flow and$2 milron per year mnfrbution.
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 7
March 15, 2000
Attachments
Several worksheets and graphs are enclosed with this report. They are intended to
provide background information requested by the Committee and to stimulate
discussion at the meeting. Each is briefly described with bullet points in the following
sections.
Exhibit A: Revenue Area Representation
• When current fees were established the vote was by District. Each Director voted
only on the fees in the District which included the Director's city.
• Since the 1998 consolidation, all of the Directors vote for all of the Revenue Areas,
whether or not that Director's city is included in the Revenue Area.
• A vote to change fees now requires a two-thirds vote of all of the Directors, or 17
votes.
• This schedule provides an idea of how many people and cities are affected by rate
decisions.
Exhibit B: Analysis of Net Assets
• Net assets is a better measure of current economic health than simply "reserves" or
cash balances. Net assets is the sum of current cash balances and fixed assets,
less the sum of depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities.
• The ranking of Revenue Areas by net assets can be based on several variables.
Just using the total is too simplistic and misleading because of the varying sizes of
the Revenue Areas.
• The chart shows net assets for each Revenue Area on the basis of per capita, per
flow in million gallons a day, per acre of land and per$100 of assessed value.
• The blue highlights show that ranking by each of the variables produces a different
Revenue Area with the highest value. This indicates that the relationship between
net assets and user fees may not be a good decision criteria as selecting the
variable alters the result.
Exhibit C: Previously Adopted Supplemental User Fees
• The first user fee was adopted in 1982 in District 5. Other Districts adopted fees as
their financial situations required, until all had user fees in 1991.
• Regular, routine and required fee increases were apart of the Financial Plan
adopted in 1990.
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 8
March 15, 2000
• Rate increases were deferred from 1991 to 1997 because of the poor economy.
• In 1992-93 fees were increased as an urgency measure to replace property taxes
anticipated to be confiscated by the State. District 11 did not increase fees at this
time.
• In 1997 Districts 1 and 11 adopted 10-year rate increases and Districts 2 through 7
adopted 5-year rate increases after considerable study and evaluation of
alternatives.
• When the Districts consolidated on July 1, 1998, the new District adopted the
previously approved rate increases through 2001-02 for each of the Revenue Areas.
The remaining 5 years of adjustments for Revenue Areas 1 and 11 were not
adopted.
• The adoption of a revised rate structure for 1998-1999 after the Rate Advisory
Committee and Strategic Plan process allowed for some minor rate decreases in
order for the program to be "revenue neutral."
• No Board actions are required to implement the previously adopted rates or slightly
reduced rates for 2000-01 and/or 2001-02.
Exhibit D: Average Daily Flow
• Most costs at the District are based upon or caused by wastewater flow. The O&M
projected for each year depend upon flow projections. Lower flows will result in
lower user fee projections. A portion of the Capital Improvement Program is for
additional capacity, based upon flow projections.
• Strategic Plan flow projections were based upon population projections, city general
plans, and history.
• Current flows are somewhat below the Strategic Plan estimates. Projected flows in
the year 2020 remain unchanged.
• Average daily flow is variable and difficult to project.
• Higher average flow years may correspond to higher rainfall years.
• Higher than average rainfall was experienced in 1994-95 and 1997-98.
• Higher than average flows were also experienced in 1994-95 and 1997-98.
• The increased flows seem to be proportional to the rainfall.
• Higher than average flows in 1996-97 are not explained by rainfall.
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 9
March 15, 2000
Exhibit E: SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown
• Many factors affect user fee calculations, including costs and revenues.
• All current revenue streams are projected to continue.
• User fees are for three main categories of casts: Operations & Maintenance, Capital
Improvements and Rehabilitation, and Debt Service.
• New debt financing requires increased fees, but less than pay-asyou-go.
• Summary schedule for 1999-2000, 2003-04 and 2008-09 shows that the majority of
increased user fees will be used for the capital improvement program and debt
service.
Exhibit F: Proiected SFR User Fees Charts
• There are individual graphics for four alternatives.
• Alternative 1 is the status quo. Each Revenue Area adopts its own fees based upon
its own needs. This alternative raises the most fees.
• Alternative 2 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years. Fees
above the average are then maintained until the average reaches their level. By
2013-14, all Revenue Areas will have the same fee. This alternative avoids fee
increases for several years after 2002-03 in Revenue Areas 1, 5, 11 and 13.
• Alternative 3 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years also. In
2002-03 all Revenue Areas adopt the same fee. This alternative results in reduced
fees for users in Revenue Areas 1, 3, 5, 11 and 13; approximately 1.2 million people.
• Alternative 4 implements the unified consolidated rate immediately in 2000-01,
unless the previously adopted rate is lower. In that case,the previously adopted
rates are implemented until they reach the average. All Revenue Areas are paying
the same rate in 2001-02. This alternative results in rate decreases in 2000-01 for
Revenue Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, 11 and 13, approximately 1.3 million people.
Exhibit G: Annual SFR Sewer User Fees
• This schedule summarizes the four alternatives.
• No fees are currently adopted for 2002-03. Potentially fees will increase for some or
all of our 2.2 million users.
• The proposed annual sewer fees are shown by year for each alternative and each
Revenue Area.
Proposed Rate Structure
Page 10
March 15, 2000
• The lowest fee is highlighted for each year, for each alternative, and each Revenue
Area.
• All of the consolidation alternatives result in lower average fees than those from
retaining separate revenue areas.
• Population estimates are also provided to help gauge the impact of the changes.
• Alternative 4 provides immediate rate reduction to approximately 1.3 million users.
Exhibit H: One District Excluding 7 & 14 One Rate Cash Flow Projections
• Provides "detail'to support earlier summary of User Fee Breakdown.
• O&M Expense, line 9, is based on current cost per mg and projected flows.
• Capital Outlay, line 10, is from Strategic Plan.
• COP Services, line 11, assumes 25-year debt shown on line 4 at 6.5%. Repaying
$100,000,000 adds approximately$11.00 to the annual user fee.
• Annual SFR User Fees are shown on line 17 and calculate the amounts on line 1.
• Schedule assumes property taxes, line 3, will continue to be allocated to District.
• Schedule reflects Alternative 4, the lowest rates. Other alternatives would raise
more fees.
GGS:lc
V4 dmWatal\wp.dWNAn%210kcmne\FAHRTah2000War%BwrdSRConeRAs.doe
03/01/2000 11:59 AM
Revenue Area Representation
Population
Description 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Jan 1, 1999
Est Population, 2000 228,965 656,434 749,953 61,119 111,470 169,146 128,774 46,072
Anaheim x x x 306,298
Brea x x x 38.388
Buena Park x 75,869
Costa Mesa x X X 105,608
Cypress x 48,517
Fountain Valley x x 56,445
Fullerton x x 126,757
Garden Grove x x 156,534
Huntington Beach x X 196,660
Irvine x 136,577
La Habra x x 55,805
La Palma x 16,395
Los Alamitos x 12,031
Newport Beach X x x 73,965
Orange X X x x 127,603
Placentia x 49,127
Santa Ana X x x x 314,990
Seal Beach X 27,192
Stanton X 33,853
Tustin x x 66,834
Villa Park X 6,630
Westminster x 86,248 m
Yorba Linda X x 61,839 S
W
D
G:bxcel.dtaNnW Uatreed!Qty Fees except 7
02/29/2000 6:35 PM
Analysis of Net Assets
Assets Minus Liabilities Includino COPS
Shadlne Indicates Hiohest Value
Net Assets Per
R4 Total Capita MGD Acre $100 AV
1 35,927,871 159 10 2,983 55
2 263,057,403 426 26 3,874 75
3 265,754,909 371 27 4,068 79
5 65,881.509 1,153 53 5.600 61
6 43,303,875 403 33 4,414 73
7 97,507,794 614 30 4,362 61
11 62,853,871 533 31 6,205 70
13 21,614,474 758 55 947 2
Wtd Avg 422 27 3.865 72
m
x
x
m
W
G^et<oel.deNn12101stree W-00 bWgOlTrue consolidation Net Assets
OW912000 245 PM
Previously Adopted Supplemental user Fees
Revised
Structlite'
84-85 85- 86-07 87_88 88_89 89_90 90_91 91-92 92-93' 93-94 94=95 95-96 96-97 2LO 9&99'.moo•: 9900 00-01 01-02
ANNUAL SFR FEES
1 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 34.32 45.00 55.00 75.00 83.24 83.24 53.24 83.24 83.24 91.36 100.27 ' 96.41 110.04 120.77 132.55
2 65.00 60.00 71.52 71.52 71.52 71.62 71.52 73.00 75.00 74.00 76.00 80.00 82.00
3 30.36 50.00 60.00 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 75.00 MOD 75.50 76.001 78.00 80.00
5 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 45.00 55.00 75.00 96.75 96.75 95.75 96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75 $4.50 87.50 87.50 87.60
6 26.40 26.40 29.04 31.68 38.02 49.00 55.00 MOD 76.47 76.47 76.47 76.47 78.47 78.00 80.00 79.00 80.00 84.00 86.00
7 40.00 50.D9 50.09 50.09 50.09 50.09 55.00 60.00 60.00 66.00 73.00 80.00
11 26.40 40.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 MOD 80.00 80.00 , MOD 101.25 113.91
13 70.00 70.00 70.00 78.40 78.40 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 WO.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Rates Unchanged from year of implementation: 'Rates were originally adopted equal to 1991-92 'RAC rate stucture
Dist 1:1984,Dist 5: 1982.Dist 6: 1983,Dist 13: 1985 but increased in response to State tax confiscation allowed decrease for SFR
X
2
W
1
n
G:lexcel.dta1fin1210MtreadWW d copy%EXCELDTAWae Hist
osrzMM Average Daily Flow
Actual Thru 1998-99
Growth Projection Thru 2019-20
450
400 - --- - -- - - - -- --
350
300
A
I7
L
d
a 250
c
0
m
c
200
0
150
100
50
0
X
2
W
Fiscal Year Ened June 30 1
0
—�-1955 Actual —1955 Linear —1992 Linear -L -CDM Projections +Modified CDM Projections
M,Mplanfl.hist B pr.LChadl 4,0 PM
02/E9/2000 Page 1 of 1
SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown
All Revenue Areas Except 7 and 14
A E J K
1999-2000 Estimates 2003-04 Estimates 2008-M Estimates 10 Year
Ref Total Per EDU Total Per EDU Total Per EDU Total
1 Operations 8 Maintenance
2 Collection System O&M 7,720,500 10.26 8,359,000 10.96 9,231,000 11.89 84,560,500
3 Treatment Plant OBM 38,328,000 50.95 40,641,000 53.27 45.276,000 68.33 412,430,000
4 Total O&M Expense 46,048,500 61.21 49,000.000 64.23 54,607,000 70.23 496,990.500
5 Permitted User Fees (5,591,000) (7.43) (6,176,000) (8.10) (6,987,000) (9.00) (62,675.000)
6 Interest Income 20,164,000 6.80 17,301,000 22.68) (16,368,000) 21.09 (184,609,000)
7 Net OBM Expense 20,293,500 26.97 25.523,000 33AS 31.152.000 40.14 249,706,500
8 Capital Improvements
9 Collection System CIP 21,467,100 28.53 26,793,100 35.12 12.812.000 16.51 171,440,000
10 Treatment Plant CIP 59,803,000 79.49 65.641,100 86.04 59,101,000 76.14 704.045,100
11 Total Capital lmprovemt 81,270,100 108.03 92.434,200 121.16 71,913.000 92.65 875.485.100
12 Connection Fees (4,823,000) (6.41) (4,847,000) (6.35) (4,877.000) (6.28) (48.600.000)
13 Capacity Sales,SAWPA 0 0.00 (6,045,000) (7.92) 0.00 (17,591,000)
14 From Savings or New COPS 42,238,000 56.14 63,190,000 82.83) 52,680,000 67.88 (597,642,000)
15 Net Capital Outlay 34,209,100 45.47 18,352,200 24.06 14,346.000 18.48 211,852.100
16 Debt Service
17 COP Service 32.238,000 42.85 52,976,000 69.44 70,560,000 90.91 633,966,000
18 Property Taxes (29.568,000) (39.30) (32,004,000) (41.95) (35,337,000) (45.53) (323,757,000)
19 Net COP Service 2,670,000 3.55 20,972,000 27.49 35,223,000 45.38 210,108,000
20 Raised by General User Fees 57,172,600 76.00 64,847,200 85.00 80,721,000 104.00 671,666,600
21 No.of Equiv Dwelling Units 752,320 762,920 776,170
22 Average Daily Flow(mgd) 240 0.000319 283 0.000345 293 0.000377
23 New Borrowing 72,000,000 92.78 495,000,000
Revenue Area 99-00 Budget x7814_Use Fee Analysis 11:27 AM
RI � ��
Projected SFR User Fees
$180
$160 -
$140
L
$120
-
$100 -
$80
Q
$60
$40
$20
m
x
$0Im ILLU LL[L[l E Jillill iiiiiiii LLLLLLI] [iLLLW
99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14
= 1 =2 = 3 EM5 = 6 07 = 11 = 13 - One Rate
o�.z9'onu Rate Chad(3)Chad 1 9,58 AM
Projected SFR User Fees
$180
$160
$140
$120 m m
m-
(D
a)
U- $100 FD
D $80 m
c
Q
$60
$40
$20 IBM
m
x
0 W
x
99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 -,
T
W
E= 11=2 = 3M15 =6O7 = 11 = 13 - OneRatej
0snen000 Revenue Area9 00 Budget X7814.xle Chart 1 10:09AM
Projected SFR User Fees
$180 �-
$160
$140
$120 j
m-
a�
L- $100
� $80 -
c
Q
$60
$40
$20
m
x
$0
99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 =1
T
AL
01 02 =3 O5 =6 O7 = 11 = 13 —One Rate
02 29 20M Revenue Area 99-00 Budget X7614> ChM 1-1 10,27 AM
03/01/2000 12:33 PM
Annual SFR Sewer User Fees
Already Adopted Fees vs. "One-Rate"Alternatives
Shading Represents Lowest Rate Alternative
Description 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13
Est Population, 2000 228,985 656,434 749,953 61,119 111,470 169.146 128,774 46,072
Adopted Fees
1999-2000 110.04 76.00 77.00 87.50 80.00 66.00 90.00 100.00
2000-01 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00
2001-02 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00
Alt 1 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00
Alt 2 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00
Alt 3 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00
Alt 4 00-01 Fees 78.00 78.00 78.00 78.00 78.00 73.00 78.00 78.00
Alt 1 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00
Alt 2 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 60.00 113.91 100.00
Alt 3 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00
Alt 01-02 Fees 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00
No Fees Adopted
Alt 1 02-03 Fees 145.47 84.00 82.00 87.50 86.00 87.00 123.00 100.00
All 2 02-03 Fees 132.55 82.50 82.50 87.50 84.00 82.50 113.91 100.00
Alt 3 02-03 Fees 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 m
Alt 02-03 Fees 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 x
2
Co
07
G:becel.EtaViM210WreatlV3kck Veatch Survey 2000
031012000 12 45 PIA
Orange County Sanitation District
One District Excluding 7 & 14, One Rate Cash Flow Projections
No Adopted
Rates Adopted In 1997 R.I.
Preferred Preliminary Palmer, Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary 10 Year
Rol De�Deen 19%.00 244491 20)1 02 o2a3 4144 04-05 05�06 0667 07-0 at,0s L
Revenues:
1 General User Foes 57,176,320 58,687,860 60,609,600 62,122275 64,618.200 66.957.375 69.901 73,232.650 76,578,480 50.721,6110 671.672.290
2 Permitted User Fees 5.591,000 5.732.000 5.877.000 6,025.0% 6.176.0% 6=000 6,40.9,000 6,651,000 6,817,M 6,987,000 62,675,000
3 Property Tawas 29.568,000 30.159.000 30.761,000 31977,0% 32.004,000 32.644,000 33.298.000 33,955,000 34,644,000 35,337,000 323,757,000
4 New COP Issues - 126.000,000 - 127,000,000 - 100.000,000 - 70,0%.000 - 72,0110,000 495,000,000
5 Interest Revenues 20,164,000 21,686,000 20,250,000 16,3 .= 17,301,000 17.262.000 18.073.000 17.M.9 17267.M 16,369,000 184,609,000
6 Connection Fees 4923,000 4.629,000 4.8215,1)00 4,641,000 4.847.000 4.M.000 4,059.000 4,865,000 4,871,000 4,877,000 48.=).000
7 Other Revenues(Ind IRWD) 571E1 8.610.00e) 3.142000 110 7.196,000 1,155,000 1159000 7208,000 116]00) 1.167000 W.m.00o
8 Revenues 114 .320 255.913,660 125.474,600 251.462 ]5 1323n.200 229.251.375 1W.786.020 213,009,650 141,04 W 217,457.680 1,675,375260
Requirements'.
9 Oper&Meet,Erp 46,046500 45.7n.000 d6.515.000 41,905,000 49.000.0001 50,M.M 51,192,000 52293.000 53.398.01)) 54,507.000 4%,990,500
10 Capital Outlays,Ind GWR6 61,270.000 126.006.000 125.6159% 127,774,000 92.433,0110 58,474,M 55231,000 67,062.000 69.623.0D0 71.913.000 615,436,0W
11 COP service is 5%,25 yr) 32,235,000 37,375,000 42.263,0% 47,684,000 52,976,000 5].1]9,%0 61.594,000 64,467,000 67,529,000 70,560900 533.565.000
12 Order Rearinmt,me 6975000 2975,000 2.975,000 975A00 975.000 975000 975.000 975.000 975,000 975,000 19750,0%
13 Requirements 1%.531,500 212173000 217.674.000 224330.000 1%984,0% 166.722.000 160,992.000 154,797,000 191,525,000 197.9155oto 1,926991,5%
14 Revenues Requiremente 7.971,820 K),74 ,W (92,19 ,400) 27.124,275 (0.011.81 62.529.375 (35.205,950) 29,012,65) (50,10Q5m) 19,502.650 (50.716240)
Accumulated Funds.
15 Beginning of Year 344,953,000 352.924.020 398.665.480 304.466.080 301,590.355 20,578,555 331107,930 295,901,950 324,914,600 274,734p50 344953,000
16 End of Year 352924820 30665460 Jp4,d%,OBO 331590.355 268578555 331107930 295 WI 950 324.914.600 274734.060 294,236760 294.236.7W
sewer service Use,Fees:
17 Avg SFR Annual User Fee $76.00 $7890 $80.00 $82.50 $85.00 $87.50 $91.00 $95.00 $99.00 $104.00
10 Porconlage Clunga (328%) 263% 2.%% 3,13% 3.03% 2.94% 4,00% 4.40111& 421% 5.05%
19 Equivalent Dwelling Units 752,320 754970 757,620 760,270 762,920 765,570 768,220 770.870 ]73.520 776,170
20 SFR Connection Feel $1,820 $1820 $1,BM $1.820 $1.620 $t.620 $1,820 $1,520 11I.M $I.W0
Prot Avg Daily Flea(m8d) 250 245 251 257 263 20 275 281 267 29$
COP Coverage Ratios
21 Senne Lien.Min 1.25 6.59 3,61 297 2W 255 2.23 2.18 2.34 2,13 2.13
22 Joe.Lien,Min 100 3.19 1.72 138 1.17 1.16 1.00 097 1,02 0,93 0.92 m
23 Sr Additional Bonds,1 25 659 361 2.97 2.56 2.56 2.23 2.18 2.34 2.13 2,13 x
24 Jr Additional Bonds,100 526 238 172 1,32 129 099 0.94 1.04 0.87 906 as
an
G'.`ozcel.dWYm21OW9-00 BudgeuRevenue Area 99-W Budget%7&14 One DisM 7 8 14,one late