Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-22 eMarch 15, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT g2411 NOTICE OF MEETING h...:014186 mailingC. Box 8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Vsleg C4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728.8127 44 Ell.4 venue WEDNESDAY, March 22, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. ipe44 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA S270B-701B DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies • cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Gordan erova Boa d Secr HununBton Beech ry Irvine Le Habra ! Pe/me On Alamitos Newport Beach onenge Placen['a Tentatively - Scheduled UDcomina Meetings Banta Ana Beal Beach Santon ruadn JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Ville Perk Vance Linde SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday, March 20,2000 at 5:30 P.M.@OCWD county or orange JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Saturday, March 25,2000 at 8:00 a.m. Scales, Dlstrits. Costa Mesa OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 5, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. Midway City PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,April 6,2000 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 12,2000 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Date to be determined @OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,April 26, 2000 at 5:00 P.M. -To Protect the Public Health and he Environment through Excellence In M teweter Systems" mn BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting April April 26, 2000 May May 24, 2000 June June 28, 2000 July 'July 19, 2000 August August 23, 2000 September September 27, 2000 October October 25, 2000 November `November 15, 2000 December 'December 20, 2000 January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:1wp.dWadminSSAgendaU000 MMUrg NOOMSAMN3.3.d. ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 03/22/00 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON..................... — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ ✓ — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD........................... % — (CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. ✓ �/ — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.....................J/ ✓ — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY........................... ✓ ✓ _ (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE................... .— Ca_ — — (MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. ✓ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................✓ �G - (GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................✓ i — (SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON................... — — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ i — (DALY)............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ �G — (LUTZ)............................_CAC GHI6A I ................ ✓ �G — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... ✓ — (RICE)............................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ _ (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ i — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ �L — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. � — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ — (MAULLER)...................... SIGLER......................... - -mmff Y-eWdem.-.......... SILVA........................... — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ ✓ — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA.........................✓ ✓ — (BLAKE)............................ ....................... — STAFF: � Anderson ✓ / ykyl Ghirelli ✓ r .I� Kyle ✓ Ludwin ✓ p McIntyre Fs " Miles Oaten ✓ Tomko ✓ Streed ✓ Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: WeeAroff� ✓ Andrus 03/22/00 H:My.dle�edMn�BS\DIRECTOR%DPedon oicadw SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 2 d -A /0, BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) (please print) �ieA,%V 604r1 uy CD/r N:YIP.DTAA=N=W0RMS%=WN FORM.DDC STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on VlAu A- a J. , 20 6, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on e /J 20dO IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of �j✓( /�( Penny M. K Kt , Secret Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District \\RADON\DATAI\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 15, 2000 abm,e: n141962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors n,.m,y aaa,.a.: 90. Box B127 Subject: Board Letter F ntem Valley.C 92728-B127 °°'°t atl°ena: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 1O9 Ere aytrue 9 Y Y 9 F rchn vanay.rn information on any of the items, please call me. 927087018 David Ludwin Receives Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award mamba,, The Orange County Engineering Council recently presented David Ludwin, our Aba,aata Director of Engineering, With a Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award. The • award is presented annually to those engineers who have significantly contributed to Okla, the engineering profession, their community and the environment. David received ,,,harm the award at the Orange County Engineering Council's Engineering Awards Banquet Brea held on February 261". The annual event is held during National Engineers Week, Beene Pan which is observed in February in honor of George Washington, engineer and first L�°fe55 Foume,n Valley president.U. S. David was also conferred the title of"Fellow" by the Institute for the Fmrartan Advancement of Engineering for outstanding service to his organization and the car"," r3nve engineering community. David's 22-year career in engineering includes service in Huntington Beech 1 yra both the private and public sectors. He has served as the District's Director of La Habra Engineering for the past four and one-half years. Le Palma Los Marc.. Newport Beach Low-flow Toilet Program Update Orange - - Precanba Since October of last year, 19,101 low-Flow toilets have been distributed free of sans ana Y Seel ee.tn charge throughout Orange County. Of that number, 529 were distributed in South Stanwn County and 18,572 were distributed in our service area. This will make an important Tustin Yil. P.,* impact on flow reduction. Ycrb. Linda County of Orange Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Examined by Technical Experts Under the auspices of the USC Sea Grant Program,a panel of technical experts from sanitary Districts around the country in the areas of microbiology, hydrodynamics, oceanography, Coerce Mae. outfall design, and coastal water quality was convened to conduct a technical review Md.,Cty of the summer 1999 Huntington Beach closure investigations. Dr. Steven Weisberg, Water District. Executive Director of the Southern California Water Research Project, chaired the panel. The panel met for 2-1/2 days (Feb 28, 29, Mar 1)and heard presentations 1'.xa Han`" from agency representatives involved in the investigation, toured the affected area, and presented its preliminary findings on the final day. The panel's charge was to critique the work that was done during the summer, provide recommendations for improving the response to future events, and suggest planning and research priorities. .To Protect Me Public Heairh and the Bnvumnrrerrc a ugh Emegence a wastewater Systems Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 March 15, 2000 The overall observations of the panel: ♦ commended the agencies for an extensive effort and robust investigation and the high level of response in a short time period; ♦ the Orange County coastline is one of the most well monitored and protected (from a public health viewpoint) in the country; ♦ last summer's investigation set a very high standard for future investigations of this sort(more than $2 million was spent, mostly local funding). Other areas may not have the resources or expertise to do what we did and may require state and federal assistance to undertake such an effort; ♦ the high level of interaction among agencies was a key to success. Critique of the investigation effort: ♦ didn't look at urban runoff issues early enough in the investigation; the focus remained on a possible sewage leak because OCSD was the lead agency; ♦ early on in the investigation, testing should have been done to distinguish between human and animal bacteria (using virus testing, speciation of bacteria, DNA tests)as a way to pinpoint the source of the contamination; ♦ onshore transport of the ouffall plume and ground water are unlikely sources of the contamination; ♦ in preparing for future events, there is a need to develop and have in place contingency plans with defined roles and responsibilities of each agency; ♦ events of this nature should be viewed as watershed issues, and as such, sanitation agencies may not be the logical choice as lead agency in future investigations. OCSD has a mixed mission: to protect public health and undertake due diligence to show it's not our problem. That focus may have distracted the interagency effort from taking a broader look at other possible sources in the watershed; ♦ a research agenda was developed,focusing on the need to develop new testing methodologies and sanitary survey procedures. USC Sea Grant will prepare a report containing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the panel. The report and its"lessons learned"will be a valuable resource to stakeholders involved in the Huntington Beach incident and Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 March 15, 2000 other coastal cities, agencies, and public interest groups that may be faced with similar events. Estimated total out-of-pocket costs for the panel will be less than $25,000. Several articles on this subject are attached to this letter. Regional Water Boards Under Attack A recent audit of three of the state's nine regional water quality control boards—in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento—found them falling behind in carrying out their responsibilities to enforce the NPDES program under the federal Clean Water Act. The audit, conducted by the EPA Regional Office in San Francisco, cites problems with the water boards' performance of core regulatory functions, such as permitting, inspections, enforcement and monitoring. A similar critique of the Water Boards' performance at a February joint hearing of the Assembly and state Senate environmental and budget committees found similar problems, citing the Boards' poor record in reducing polluted stone runoff and nonpoint source pollution. The Natural Resources Defense Counsel has filed suit, asking EPA to take over enforcement of the storm water program in California. Some of the problems can be traced back to the economic recession of the early 90's and the regulatory backsliding that occurred as a result of budget cuts at environmental agencies during the mid-90s. Staff-intensive programs, such as enforcement of NPDES permit violations, suffered as the Water Boards directed shrinking resources to controlling toxics in ground water and the cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks. This year, the state budget added resources for more inspectors and nonpoint source programs and further increases may be on the horizon. Articles reporting on these events, from The Wall Street Journal/California, Long Beach Press-Telegram, and Los Angeles Times, are attached. Directors Workshop Scheduled on the Groundwater Replenishment System On Saturday, March 25 between 8 and 11, the Directors of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will have an opportunity to review the progress of the GW R project and to discuss some of issues in more detail with staff from both agencies and the project consultant. We strongly urge you to attend, as the information provided will help you with future decision-making regarding this project. Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 March 15, 2000 1 have also attached a copy of the March 1, 2000 letter that discusses the project cost estimate and a copy of a memorandum from IN Pickler, OCW D Director and Chair of the GWR Joint Coordination Committee, that lists the public outreach contacts. OCSDISAWPA Monthly Coordination Meetings The first meeting with SAW PA was held at the District on February 17. Included in the attachments is a copy of the minutes from that meeting. As you can see by the minutes, there are many issues that impact both agencies, and this monthly meeting will help reach consensus through face-to-face exchange. Designing for Healthy Watersheds Seminar Attached is a letter invitation from the County of Orange Planning & Development Services Department for two two-part seminars on restoring and enhancing our watersheds. The first series is scheduled for March 16 and 23 at the Osborne Building in Santa Ana, and the second will be held at the Dana Point Harbor Youth & Group Facility. If you are interested in attending, please contact Mike Wellborn at (714) 834-2486, or e-mail at wellbornm(a)pdsd.co.orange.ca.us. There is no charge for the seminars. Odor Complaints Attached is a table that logs odor complaints received about Plant 1, Plant 2 or the Collection System, and indicates whether the complaint was plant related. This report will be routinely included in future Letters to the Board. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald .9Mclnlyre General Manager DFM.jt H\WP DTnwDMxlt IDrWIE RS TOT E 90MPil0'4]]Iu0 DOC Attachments LA Times Pagel of 2 CC L!ill.(.C" -elf. Me. Home I Discussions I print Edition I Archives I Site Nap I Home Delivery I Advertise I Help Nem Business Sports http://v .Latimes.com/editions/orange/200DO302/t000020326.htmt PoIIHa Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifleds ShossDin• mJic -Wift an, 1016 nines, Back t0 story TV,reslaursn cars,renal Thursday, March 2, 2000 Experts Criticize Dirty Beach Closure a Lengthy Huntington shutdown could have been avoided if tests had been done earlier, scientists say. By DAVID REYES,Times SItl1 Wrher Contamination that closed Huntington Beach for more than two months last summer might have been cut short if a county task force had used some key tests earlier, a panel of experts concluded Wednesday. The panel of microbiologists, oceanographers and environmentalists concluded a three-day review of the beach closure and subsequent investigation as part of a program sponsored by USC's Sea Grant Institutional Program for environmental studies. Panel members heard presentations from task force members, including the Orange County Sanitation District, which spent more than$1.5 million investigating the contamination that closed the beach, hurting the city's economy and spoiling its image as a haven for surfers. The panel also made recommendations for handling future incidents. One mistake investigators made in tracking down the source of the contamination was not testing sooner to determine if the bacteria that caused it came from animals or humans. Suspecting it might come from human waste, officials spent much time and effort looking for sewage leaks. Eventually, however, they concluded the contamination was caused by a combination of urban runoff and animal waste in the Talbert Marsh. Had they identified the bacteria sooner as coming from animal waste, officials might have diverted water from the marsh into a treatment plant, possibly allowing the beach to reopen sooner, experts said. Additionally, tests for water-borne viruses and also DNA fingerprinting should have been ordered during peak bacteria levels in July after investigators knew from samplings that they were high in June, panelists said. This could have helped pinpoint the cause of the contamination. "I would have started virus testing in July when they had hits and hits of high bacteria," said Joan B. Rose, a panelist and professor in the University of South Florida's Department of Marine Science. "When you have a biological problem, it http://www.latimes.com/cgi-biiVprint.cgi 03/02/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 2 behooves us to do virus testing. "There's plenty of sophisticated tests out there that could have been conducted and weren't," she said. Panelists also recommended the county adopt a better plan for handling a major "biological event" such as the Huntington Beach contamination. With the sanitation district in charge of the investigation, the closures were conducted under a presumption the bacteria was caused by sewage, said Stephen B. Weisberg, director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. "There is no implication that the sanitation agency did anything wrong," Weisberg said. "But in planning for the future, should the sanitation district take the lead?We see a potential negative because they have a different mission." Weisberg said hundreds of holes were punched in the ground and dozens of sewage pipelines were cleaned out and checked for sewage leaks and not other sources such as urban runoff during the early stages of the investigation. "But if the Orange County public facilities agency was in charge, they might have targeted the Talbert Marsh earlier as a potential source," he said. The 25-acre wetlands preserve is on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway at Brookhurst Street. It attracts thousands of migratory birds and other wildlife each year, part of the Talbert watershed that encompasses 12 square miles in Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Channels in the marsh have earthen walls that allow absorption, while marsh sediment is tainted by animal waste. Ocean water flows into the channels during high tides and then back out, flushing marsh sediment that is carried to the shoreline less than a mile away. . a + Beach Closure Revisited Experts say the two-month closure of Huntington State Beach last summer was caused by urban runoff and bacteria from animal waste. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/printcgi 03/02/2000 Cleaning Up Our Beaches Page 1 of 2 ,r �-nLCiC Home I Discussions I Print Edition I Archives I Site Map I Hone Deli"q I Advense I Help News Business Sports SUMay.Marts 12.20001 p Print thisstory Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music movies.an. ions,nomes.cars. Cleaning Up Our Beaches Tu reslaurams remain Specialists in marine biology offered some Commentary valuable suggestions this morlth to Orange County TOP STORIES officials in the event of another beach closure •Strengthen UCI Medical School because of pollution. •Cleaning Up Our Beanies Environmentalists,oceanographers and •Bus Route Changes wont'HeigR_ders microbiologists said one early step is to determine if MORE the source of contamination is bacteria from News Sports Calendar Live' animals or humans. Business High Schod Home Design Last August,county officials thought the Commentary Sports Safety Zone bacteria in the waters off Huntington Beach were caused by humans,the likely result of a sewer leak. Classifieds Finn a name.oar,rental.d cek n,acnaMrte. Finding the source of the leak became a priority. auction.Dour.acne o RV Place an Ad g P ty. Subsequent testing produced little but See mi,.cek s Print Edition Advertisements frustration. Eventually the investigators concluded MMISI INIEWM that the contamination resulted from a combination Books caumnisM C o sm d of urban runoff and animal waste in Talbert Marsh. Food o ftlAtOn HoiescLessor Learning Leaning the source sooner could have allowed Hgalth ob�aries Loney Hghway 1 Spence Traffic officials to divert water from the marsh into a Real Estate special Reports weather treatment plant rather than having it flow untreated So.Cal.Living Times Poll SITE MAP to the ocean,the usual practice. Sunday opinion Reading by 9 The diversion might have allowed the speedier BUY MOVIES AT REELCOM reopening of the beach at a time of peak demand. I�r�rW M rue - This month, USC's Sea Grant Institutional „0.n,r,� -EF-- G.1 Program for environmental studies sponsored a program that included a three-day review of the beach closure and investigation of contamination. FIND YOUR The marine biology specialists heard presentations ' • • DREAM from county officials,including those of the Orange • VACATION County Sanitation District,who tried to identify the source of the pollution. It's good that county officials took part in the study sessions even though they realized that some of their actions might be criticized. Beach closures unfortunately are becoming more frequent in Southern California, including Orange County.Until they can be stopped, learning how to minimize the effects is the best course of action. Also worth consideration is the suggestion that http://www.latimes.conVed itions/orange/commenV20000312/t000023830.html 03/13/2000 Cleaning Up Our Beaches Page 2 of 2 an agency other than a sanitation district be in charge of hunting for the source of pollution. That ' might open investigators to a wider range of possibilities rather than focusing on human contamination for too long. In January, county supervisors approved spending more than $460,000 to help divert urban runoff from storm drains. Keeping runoff from ocean waters can be a big help in keeping the beaches open. Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. RELATED.STORIES 1 News Business Sports POati Travel Commentary Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music,Ima .. s o Rome..cats, 7Y.its rentals is fl ' t hftp://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/com mentt200003l2/t000023830.html 03/13/2000 Beach merchants divided on closure study Page 1 of 2 �—net r4: Home I nisaimons I Pnnt Enid A r iS S'1jaM9D I HH= D jW ry 16dver!1"1 Hip News Business Sports Thursday,March 9,2000 Politics Travel commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shoop ng News from Huntington Beach in the Times Community music.mn,,e,ad, jaU.ho Newspapers L/.mataunint Nals Beach merchants divided on closure study OC Beach Cities ■Expert panel says last summers four-mile beach TOP STORIES closure could have been handled better by city, • Firm Hire tl Despite Its Missteps county. • Traffic Forecaster GetS Pee t Despite Past Erg�r esi Inster By ERON BEN-YEHUOA MORE Community Papers Resources HU TINGTON BEACH--Beach News by Area Home Prices, School Profiles Rentals concessionaires are split about whether officials -- who investigated last stmmtees ocean Classifieds AM a hq�fir,mnial,toe.Qet.merchandlss contamination could have reduced the time the aualon coat.oiane P Rv Place an Ad shores were closed off,despite a recent report see nos.eeKs Print Edition Advertisements suggesting critical tests should have been cworssxnroonr performed sooner. Rooks Cmum9inus crossword. The findings,made by a panel of experts at a ERO Eduquhm Homer 3 pe meeting in Newport Beach last week,prove that Health obituaries LohaN officials dropped the ball by waiting more than ReatEdv t swoe, Weath two months during the peak tourist season before Reuel E�st�tg $pa9al ReQortS WeaUgr so.Cal.Uyino Times Poll SUE MAP recommending swimmers return,said Mike Ali, idaY0pinlon Reading by_9 owner of Zack's Pier Plaza and two other beach BUY MOVIES AT REEL.COM sods. rue . "They took their sweet time,"he said. �EE�� Movie F But that attitude is nothing more than Monday 1.k r R J morning quarterbacking,said Sack Clapp,owner of Dwight's concession stand. Before Igo out... "That's easy for them to say now,"he said. _ "Everybody was trying to do the best they could." �1 The panel of oceanographers,microbiologists and hydrologists concluded that officials should tvww.edandpnrve.eom have tested earlier whether the high bacteria levels were due to animal or human waste, said Phyllis Grifman,who runs USC's Sea Grant Program, which sponsored the event. By assuming the cause of contamination was human waste,they spent too much time searching for sewage leaks,ignoring urban runoff,she said. Zeroing in on runoff from the start would have led officials to the Talbert Marsh,which collects some http://www.latimes.com/communitiestnews/oc_beach_cities/20000309/thb0001719.html 03/10/2000 Beach merchants divided on closure study Page 2 of 2 of the untreated waste water that flows from _ streets and lawns before spilling out into the ocean, she said. A recent study,performed by UCI, showed the marsh might be largely responsible for the pollution problem. But during the summer,when bacteria levels soared as much as 10 times above normal, "nobody looked at the marsh," she said. One of the officials in charge of monitoring the beach during that period agreed that more could have been done sooner. Ever since the runoff was diverted into treatment plants,the levels of bacteria have not come close to their peak levels, said Larry Honeyboume, chief of the Orange County Health Care Agency's water-quality section. But Honeyboume points out that the precise cause of the contamination remains a mystery even now. 'Tm still scratching my head," he said. "So are a lot of people." I Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES / News Business Sports Politics Travel Commentary Copoght 2000 Las Angeles Imes Entertainment Classifies Shopping xu_ss.0»0 e% en. Ms.Nn,es. . U.sslaumm ren els 1 , i I 1 Ij 111 http://www.latimes.com/communifes/news/oc_beach_cities/20000309/thb0001719.html 03/10/2000 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL/CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2000 standards for pollutants'it the absence°[ _✓ aPlU.f.,sst,.gelnuentlimns make ftex- icult for the n. $4.ACE ally distinct regional boards tine o Issue per- Water Boards r mits to industry and other dischargers that } 904 C, ._ consistently apply the same criteria. Seen as Slow 4� ' •Municipal s o m-wet&N., i s don't con language ed scrrus exactly whet couwi..r Ax2 pollman—-Is can be Ilsaarteeto�ieSEE9t, ' wpni B`a+b ors and Da s. Problems _vc w2 a ono boards fail toroulinel send On 1 roblems tee staff, will focus on how well the re, copies of permits antl inspection reports to 'onal water boards are a orr—F mi—e me EPA,making it all but impossible for re lam [one i ns at could directly federal officials to monitor state antipollu By Marc L ssmsit ect public health antl safety, such as tion activities. SWfAe s`071'e w.w.srnxeva... .� permit issuing,inspecting and monitoring *Discharge reports aren't reviewed SACRAMI MI O—CalBornia's'unwieldy of water quality. quickly by regional boards to ensure that system for pmtecdng water quality is Legislators, especially, will be rater- dischargers comply with permits. struggling to overcome serious deficfen. esled in discovering what new Initiatives •Field -inspections, especially of cies. Including a lack of statewide Stan- are antler way after the walle"wiily bait. storm-waterdischarges,aren't as frequent dards for toxic pollutants,lapses in Inspire- get was Increased by $15.3 million this anaas omug as needed. lions and reporting and failure to collect year.And that funding Is only a down pay. •Federal antl state roles—which re. stiff penalties,according to a recently re, ment on new appropriations Bowing Into quire monetary allies forvlolating per. leased formal review by the U.S.Environ- the Water Resources Control Board, raft restrictions to be set high enough to mental Protection Agency. thanks to good economictimes and DeMM- site it financially punishing for polluters The report focuses on the performance relic control of both the governors office to not comply—are being ignored. between 1995 and 1995 of Wee of the state's and the Legislature: Gov. Gray Davis is Some Flexibility nine regional water-quality control asking for an additional $17.2 million for by. yickox says he has made Increased boards—in Los Angela, San Diego and the fiscal year beginning July 1. and r.HIcknl says a has made increased Sacramento—In carrying out their feder- The EPA's statewide conclusions sub and enfotesurces madeead omerstthe e ally designated responsibilities to enforce stantlally who a number of earlier studies of his the EPA's National Pollution Discharge done by the Legislative Analyst'601Dce,the ments that regulate air,Witter and toxic pol- Elimination System .Program antler the Bureau of State Audits and twomen-govern lution.He says he's told the regional water Clean Water Act.The findings show that menial environmental advocacy groups. boards that they mall employ "fair. the nine boards and their parent agency, "These issueshave been festering for along thoughtful and consistent compliance and the stale Water Resources Control Board, time,"says Mark Newton,author of a 1999 enforcement to ensure them 1s a level play- have made some recent progress,but they Legislative Analyst's Office study of slate mg field far business...and to make sure need to do much more to make up for regu- and regional water-board Program. "And that the regulated community realizes that latory backsliding in the early 1990s.Back it took,perhaps.a few external audits,as these rules and the health-based considers- then,a severe economic recession led Re- well as the lAgislature,to give Ithe water dons that underlie them are appropriately publican Gov. Pete Wilson to order deep bperdl a push."The new money,however, Implemented and need to be enforced." budget cuts at environmental agencies. seems to have given the board"momentum Mr. Hickox adds that working with 'I Would say that in many areas there is for making improvements,'he adds. business to ensure compliance should be room for improvement despite all the well- These findings are "old news," says more effective in cleaning up the environ- intended efforts;says Michael G.Schulz, Winston Hickox,secretary of the Calffor. ment than just relying on the assessment associate water division director at EPA's ilia EPA. of heavy fines. regional headquarters In San Francisco. Indeed,the series of critical audits have That attitude has been the position of-a He says stale officials dealt with limitedr& come as no surprise. In fact, they were majority of the Iregionall boards"in the sources by performing a sort of triage In hued on data,now at least IS months old, past, says Valerie Nera,director of agri- deciding which parts of federal programs provided by the state and regional boards, culture and resources Issues for the Cali- would be fully Implemented and which says Walt Pettit,the water board's excel- fornia Chamber of Commerce In Sacra- would get a"D-mmus"level of compliance. live director. memo.Moreover,she says,all the boards "They made a managerial decision to do And change is already under way, he should benefit from increased fundinglhat one part well and let other parts be sasri- says,because"we want to eet back to be- allows them to work through a backlog in ficed became they auldn't do them." inj more aggressive about solvm mmir- IssuingperMis. But tougher enforcement,While potent- Talking It out ems cos e o re c mg....and we ooe kfi The result,says state Sen.Byron Sher weFE WMe r�rrecov�mr.remt tially beneficial.Ms.Nera acids,needs to be (D.,Palo Alto),is"real problems not lost s s e s a e a al taaros alreatly approached with some degree of"Eexibil. p have made considerable progress toward try thatiscinsistendy applied statewide in at the stale bar�b3tni'7 e�resiona each of menineregional booms.She'sluok- names._matn to fixT whittling down a backlog in pollution-dis- iachofthenimanal boards.Dava'src 0 a en , r. sr,w o is chairman charge permits.The backlog now stands at nest to pass lawmakers bill met will v.Davis's such of the Senate Environmental Quality Com- only 195 permits out of a statewide total of quad,to to lose new law he signed last mitt". and Assemblywoman Hannah- 1,724.That's less than half the number of year that calls for new lawmandat he minimum Beth Jackson (D.,Santa Barbara),chair- permits outstanding reported by me leg- penalties for Clean Water Act violations. Woman of the[met house's Environmental islative analyst in mid-1998. penalties some lawmakers say the new Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, Mr.Hickox acknowledges federal EPA statute, which was sponsored by Assem- have invited EPA officials to brief lawmak- counterparts in their new review "have ors on their report at a joint oversight hear- been finding mine Improvements"In addi- blywoman Carole Migden (D., San Fran, 1ng next week.The hearing,shys commit. tion to identifying regulatory troubles. cisce), already is being administratively s weakened by the water board general EPA's Gripes counsel's recommendation to give is, But continuing W build on these Ito- gional bards "discretion" in levying provemenm will require a heavy attack on "mandatory"fines. the following deficiencies pointed out by "Thal gives me parse."says Sen.Sher. the EPA review: "This is doing business the way Ithe water 0 A lack of a statewide water-quality board'l wed todo business." LA Times Page 1 of 3 AM ��I( rlCrkN�o lined - ♦ 4:asus�i1:(.Yd aasae:� Hvma I IN=ssivns I fiintE4ilma I AMN I saamaa I Hwe ON 1 Admdaa 1 hele News Business Smrk ht4)9MWWJBO Bs.mMnewsfta 120000225MM18364.hbA Politics Travel Csommentary EnIaMlarrim Class'. eds Shhopgioy must —Am lma mmea. Back to story JY.maa1�01s 96...Ws Friday,February 25,2000 U.S. Considers Crackdown on County Runoff 6y MA8 CONE.n"wn Envhnennl Wri Citing California's failure to adequately protect its beach waters from pollution,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering forcing the state to enforce urban runoff cleanup measures in Los Angeles County. The EPA investigation is a response to a legal petition received Thursday from an influential environmental group. The Natural Resources Defense Council asked the EPA to remove the state's authority to enforce runoff rules in Los Angeles County unless dramatic improvements are made within 90 days. Speaking in unusually harsh terms,EPA officials agreed that California's enforcement is inadequate and said they will investigate the specific charges in the petition. The state's program lacks critical resources,such as inspectors,for even minimal enforcement of runoff rules in Los Angeles County required under the Clean Water Act,said Alexis Strauss,director of the EPA's regional water division in San Francisco. "It is the most underfunded regulatory program we've ever worked on, and we've worked on a lot. It's astonishing," Strauss said. "This is one of our foremost environmental concerns in California." Strauss faulted the California Legislature and the governor's office for"an unwillingness over the years to fund this program." She said the EPA hopes to work with Gov.Gray Davis to fix the problems and would take control of the program only as a last resort. Dennis Dickerson,executive officer of the state's regional water board in Los Angeles,which oversees the program,acknowledged that he has a limited staff and budget but said it is unnecessary for the federal government to take over. Experts say Southern California's runoff pollution is the most severe in the nation. Storm drains flow directly to beaches,carrying voluminous runoff from streets and parking lots tainted with virus-laden raw sewage,pesticides,oil and toxic metals. After heavy rains,Los Angeles County's entire shoreline, from Malibu to Long Beach,is rendered unsafe and is closed to swimmers for several days. Even on dry summer days,water near rivers and channels contains disease-carrying http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 03/02/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 3 germs and toxic compounds. Since 1986,the federal Clean Water Act has prohibited allowing anything but rainwater to flow into storm drains. Municipalities are required to clean up runoff to "the maximum extent practicable" and business compliance is required. The EPA granted enforcement authority to the state of California. But state records show that cleaning up runoff has been a low priority at the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Thousands of industries, construction sites and cities in Los Angeles County let pollutants drain off streets and parking lots,but inspections and penalties are rare. Dickerson said he has five staffers to oversee about 2,900 industries, 85 municipalities and 700 construction sites. The agency has calculated it needs four times as many. Officials of the California Environmental Protection Agency would not comment Thursday on the petition,which they had not seen. But Cal-EPA spokesman Edd Fong said Davis has already added 180 positions statewide and has proposed another increase for the next year. "We are beginning to turn things around,"Fong said.But little of the new money has focused on urban runoff. In the Los Angeles region,Dickerson said, only one staffer was added for runoff issues while the rest went to programs for traditional industrial pollution and underground gasoline tanks. The petition includes numerous examples of California's failures to enforce runoff rules. "The program flunks in every single category," said David Beckman,a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "It's no wonder we have the worst urban nmoff problem in the country,"he said. "The trash you find at the beach and the fact that beaches are often closed due to health concerns are directly related to the lack of regulation." The EPA's investigation could take months. If Administrator Carol Browner finds California is improperly administering the program,the state then will have 90 days to correct the problems or face withdrawal of its authority, said Ann Nutt, a senior attorney at the EPA's western regional office. The petition comes as the Los Angeles regional board is taking its first steps toward enacting major runoff rules. Last month,the board required large new developments in Los Angeles County to capture or treat runoff from the first three-quarters of an inch of rain during storms. Existing buildings face no mandate,but cities since last summer have been required to educate businesses and residents about practices to reduce runoff. But EPA officials and environmentalists say the regional board does not have enough staff or resources to enforce the new development regulation or older programs. Only 858 of 3,558 industrial plants regulated under the region's storm-water permit were inspected between 1996 and 1999. The board took formal action to penalize 37 businesses or municipalities in the 2 1/2-year period, the petition says. "At its current pace,it would take the[regional board] nearly 35 years to perform industrial site inspections at each facility in the region," the petition says. The petition for Los Angeles County is the first of its type in California and one of only a few nationally,Nutt said. http://www.latimes.convcgi-bin/print.cgi 03/02/2000 The following article simply underlines the increasing interest in urban runoff. (SPA) Officials tackle quality of water Long Beach Press-Telegram-3/1/00 By Dorothy Korber, Sacramento Bureau SACRAMENTO-Wincing at a Press-Telegram photo showing a Long Beach marina dogged with Floating trash, lawmakers sharply questioned water quality regulators Tuesday about the growing menace of polluted runoff. "NOW I see what you've been talking about," Fred Keeley murmured to fellow assemblymember Alan Lowenthal of Long Beach. Keeley represents the Monterey Bay area. The photo was a visual aid during a hearing convened jointly by four Assembly and state Senate environmental and budgeting committees. The subject was a critique of the State Water Resources Control Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards. State Sen. Byron Sher, a Palo Alto Democrat with a Harvard law degree and a strong environmental bent, set the tone for the hearing with his opening statement. 'The regional boards have struggled and sometimes failed in their responsibility to protect dean water," Sher said. "State water policy has careened from crisis to crisis. "We must repair the significant damage done to water quality over the past decade." Sher's comments mirror the findings in the Press-Telegram's 1999 series'Troubled Waters, Hidden Dangers." Mark C. Newton, the legislative analyst's water specialist, offered the lawmakers a clear picture of the current situation. He noted that the water quality boards' budget dried up during the 1990s, leading to backlogs in updating permits, performing inspections and punishing scofflaws. Newton also questioned the boards' low priority for reducing polluted storm runoff"nonpoint . - source" pollution in water quality lingo. "A majority of the state's water degradation is due to nonpoint source pollution," Newton said, but only about 3 percent($15.4 million)of the boards' proposed 2000-01 budget is earmarked for the problem. Los Angeles County residents face the worst polluted runoff situation in the United States, said attorney David Beckman of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "Los Angeles is a concrete bowl -what hits the ground goes into the water," Beckman said. 'There are two critical impacts. First, the storm runoff is acutely toxic; it kills organisms. Second, there's a high pathogenic content; it makes people sick. These are not theoretical problems, but proven ones. "You could not come up with a worse one-two punch." Lowenthal noted that the problem is especially grave in Long Beach, which lies between the mouths of two rivers and is inundated with trash and toxins after every big rain. When two officials from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board rose to speak, Lowenthal and other legislators peppered them with questions about polluted storm water.They were told that only five people are assigned to monitor nonpoint pollution in all of Los Angeles County. The legislators wanted to know how much additional money it would take to eradicate the problem- and how long, if the money was forthcoming. "Our staff works very hard,"said Executive Director Dennis Dickerson of the Los Angeles regional board, passing out photos of the Long Beach marina afloat in litter. "You can see we have a daunting task on our hands." Repeatedly, Keeley and Sher prodded Dickerson for definitive answers. "I'm asking you: To do the job, how many new people are necessary?" Sher said. Dickerson reckoned that 30 new staffers would do the job. "What difference would we see?" asked Keeley. Dickerson responded that there is a difference between bureaucratic compliance with the rules and actual water quality improvement. "We're talking about a massive, massive problem,"said Lowenthal. "Cleaning this up will take more than 30 new inspectors." After the hearing, Lowenthal said he was heartened that his fellow legislators seem determined to tackle the runoff problem and to budget money to solve it. "What was so important about the hearing is that budget committees and environmental policy committees met together at one time," he said. "We're all on the same page-and that's the way to get the job done." OCSD-SAWPA Monthly Coordination Meeting #1 Draft Minutes February 17, 2000 Attendees Joe Grindstaff, Eldon Horst, Scoff Miller, Don McIntyre, Blake Anderson, Gary Streed, Greg Mathews, Dave Ludwin, Doug Stewart, Chuck Winsor, Jim Herberg, Andrei loan Overview We met for the first time on February 17, 2000 for the purpose of coordinating the various projects and activities that impact the two agencies. It was agreed that we will meet monthly. Even months at OCSD. Odd months at SAWPA. Third Thursdays. 10 AM-noon. Status of San Bernardino RIX Bypass to SARI • 5 to 6 MGD of additional Flow is being discharged into SARI while San Bernardino cleans the RIX ponds to re-establish their design percolation rates • Grindstaff estimates that it'll take SS 12 weeks to be back up and running, depending upon weather conditions • SAWPA recognizes that this is causing Flow in the SARI to exceed the 9 MGD treatment capacity right owned by SAWPA SAWPA recognizes that it is obligated under the 1996 agreement between OCSD and SAWPA to purchase treatment capacity in the OCSD system when its average discharge rate measured at the county line exceeds the treatment capacity right owned by SAWPA. However, OCSD staff also recognizes the unique, emergency and apparently one time nature of the RIX capacity problem (assuming for now that this doesn't portend the beginnings of a long tens problem with the RIX system) and for this reason OCSD staff does not view this overage as a purchase issue that SAWPA must address. • Note also, that the pending 2 MGD brine purchase can offset this overage only to the extent that the overage Is brine discharge from the existing groundwater desalter operations of SAWPA Status of Brine Disposal Capacity Purchase • SAWPA staff will seek authorization from its commission to purchase 2 MGD of brine (only)treatment capacity on March 13 now that it is in possession of the contract and OCSD's cover letter • SAWPA expects to begin utilizing this capacity beginning in approximately 12 months as the Chino desalter comes on line • SAWPA anticipates the potential need for 2-3 MGD more brine treatment capacity as the Menefee, Perris and Chino 11 groundwater desalters come on line. Funding for these additional desalters is dependent upon proceeds from the Water Bond on the March 2000 ballot. • Action Required: SAWPA pays OCSD for brine capacity upon SAWPA Commission approving purchase Future Models of how SAWPA acquires and maintains capital treatment capacity in the OCSD system • We discussed the possibility of using other methods for SAWPA acquiring and maintaining capital treatment capacity in the OCSD system. Basically, there's three options: 1.) Existing practice of SAWPA purchasing increments of treatment capacity in 1 MGD increments, payable over time, in accordance with the 1996 agreement; 2.)Annualized capital facilities charge paid by SAWPA to OCSD in much the same way that large users within the OCSD system now pay OCSD under its 1999 Supplemental Capital Facilities Connection Charge Ordinance; or, 3.)Adjusted capital facilities equity participation by SAWPA in the OCSD system in much the same way that the OCSD revenue areas now adjust capital facilities equity between the revenue areas. • Action Required: Gary Streed of OCSD will run models of the three options to determine their financial implications and convey his results to OCSD and SAWPA staff prior to the next meeting of the group. • Action Required: OCSD and SAWPA staff will discuss the relative financial and political implications of the three options at the next scheduled meeting. Status of SAWPA's AIP to OCSD • Action Required: SAWPA will pay OCSD the outstanding invoices owed OCSD in March 2000 Source Control Issues • SAWPA mentioned that its member agencies have expressed preliminary interest in establishing septage dump stations within their service areas. OCSD staff indicated concern over this possibility. Their are source control issues implied in the operation of any trucked waste dump stations. There would have to be a significant effort directed toward unannounced monitoring of the dump station and an aggressive enforcement program associated with the operation of such stations. OCSD staff recounted the concern that EPA has expressed with regard to the operation of a robust and auditable source control program in the upper basin. OCSD staff expressed its interest in consistently meeting all of the terms and conditions of its ocean discharge permit and that accountability and control of an upper basin source control program is of paramount concern it OCSD. OCSD staff expressed a preference of having one entity, namely SAWPA, administer and manage septage dump station(s) in the upper basin Status of SARI Control Gate Construction at Savi Ranch • OCSD reported that this control gate is constructed and operational. The purpose of this gate is to completely isolate the section of the SARI line downstream of this gate in the event of a catastrophic failure of the SARI line upstream of the gate. This isolation gate will prevent river water and sediment entering the OCSD conveyance and treatment system which would otherwise happen in the event of such an occurrence. • OCSD staff noted that the gate will not be used as a way to intentionally and electively interrupt service in the SARI line Relocation of the SARI out of the flood plain of the SAR • This 25 year old line has approximately 5 miles of its length within the flood plain of the SAR. Over time, it has lost much of its cover because of the gradual downward erosion of the bed of the SAR. This has occurred under the present condition of peak river flows of approximately 5000 cis which occur from time to time during storm conditions. Under the vast majority of time, the river flows at a rate far less than 5000 cfs. In the future,the bed of the BAR is expected to continue to erode further, causing the SARI line to be increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic washout and failure. • If and when Prado Dam is raised and improved, the expected maximum peak river flow rate will increase to 30000 cis. This six fold increase in flow will cause the SARI to be more vulnerable to catastrophic washout and failure. • For these reasons, OCSD has embarked on a multiple year-engineering and environmental study to determine the technical,financial and environmental Implications of relocating one or more reaches of the SARI line out of the flood plain of the SAR and into the northern side of the river. SAWPA owns an average of approximately 75%of the capacity of the reaches in question. The most upstream reach is 100% SAWPA-owned. The most downstream reach is approximately 50% SAWPA-owned. Preliminary cost estimates (which will be re-estimated by OCSD later this year)range from $17 to$41 million dollars, depending upon the alternative. OCSD is performing an EIR that will describe the environmental implications of these alternatives. This work will be completed later this year. • OCSD has anticipated the funding needs for the relocation of the SARI line and is prepared to finance its share of the cost of the project, assuming funding by OCSD and SAWPA only and in accordance with the respective ownership ratios of the two agencies of the reaches in question. Financing the SARI line relocation is going to be difficult for SAWPA. Assuming funding by OCSD and SAWPA only, and in accordance with the respective ownership ratios, SAWPA staff estimates that the$17 million alternative would cause SAWPA to roughly double its existing user charge rate and a $34 million alternative would roughly triple its existing user charge rate. For this reason, SAWPA has proposed to the County of Orange and to ' the Corp of Engineers that state subvention grants representing 80%of the project costs be used to relocate the SARI line in preparation for the improvements to Prado. SAWPA indicates that both the County of Orange and the Corp are supportive of this idea. The 20% local share would be funded by SAWPA and OCSD, in accordance with their ownership shares of the reaches.There is uncertainty about when subvention funds would actually become available and whether this project would receive formal funding authorization by the Corp of Engineers (and, possibly, other agencies with authority over this question). • Other grant support was discussed. The California Water Bond, appearing on the March 2000 ballot is a potential source of funds. There Is money that will be competitively awarded to projects that meet certain criteria, of which the SARI line should certainly qualify. However, there is uncertainty regarding the competitiveness of the need of the SARI line relocation as compared to other and at this point unknown competing projects • There is also the possibility of seeking grant money directly through the legislature. No action on this idea has taken place. • Action Required: Scott Miller of SAWPA and either Bob Ghirelli or Gary Streed of OCSD will work together to create a proposed grant funding strategy and convey It back to the group at the March meeting. • Action Required: Eldon Horst of SAWPA will set up a meeting between OCSD, SAWPA and the Corp of Engineers to achieve clarity about the timing, criteria, and likelihood of the SARI line relocation receiving state subvention grant funding under the scenario of the Prado Dam Improvement project receiving Congressional authorization to proceed. • Action Required: Given the potential increasing vulnerability of the SARI line to future washout and catastrophic failure, both agencies will consider developing an emergency response plan for addressing such a failure. Santa Ana Sucker • OCSD is addressing the Santa Ana Sucker in part of its effort to develop an EIR for the relocation of the SARI. Kris Lindstrom, an environmental consultant, and Andrei loan, project manager for the relocation work, have primary responsibility for managing the EIR work. • SAWPA's Mark Norton has project management responsibility for SAWPA's efforts to address certain habitat management issues related to the Santa Ana Sucker • OCWD's consultant Jim Van Haun, Orange County's Mike Wellborn, and Lindell Marsh,are coordinating the studies and certain proposed habitat conservation planning efforts that are designed to prevent the Sucker from being further threatened by activities within its range in certain portions of the Santa Ana river and some of its tributaries • OCSD and SAWPA recognizes the need to make certain these parallel efforts are coordinated in the interest of all parties involved, including the objective of preserving the Santa Ana Sucker in accordance with the requirements of the ESA. • Action Required: Kris Lindstrom will be briefed by OCSD's Bob Ghirelli, as a start, and then Kris will take the necessary steps to appropriately coordinate the EIR work of OCSD with the work of the other initiatives mentioned above. OCSD Engineering will report on the progress to coordinate activities from its end at the next meeting. Next Meeting • Thursday March 16, 10 AM, SAWPA • Action Required: Agenda item deadline to Peggy at SAWPA, Monday, March 13, noon • Action Required: Agenda publication by SAWPA via e-mail, Tuesday, March 14, 9 AM Blake Anderson Groundwater w Replenishment System March 1, 2000 Don McIntyre General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Don McIntyre: As a reminder, late last year the project design team for the Groundwater Replenishment System began refining the cost estimate for the project. As part of the EIR/EIS process, a preliminary financial estimate of$292 million for Phase I was prepared. Following the EIR/EIS process, as a normal part of the project development phase, we began reviewing and refining the estimated cost. In December 1999 we established a new project cost estimate of$356 million. This number is higher due to project changes, a data entry error and inflation. It is important to keep in mind that the new $356 million project cost estimate for Phase I contains a 20% contingency and is still preliminary. We have many options to lower the cost of the project without lowering the high treatment standards for the water. Throughout the project we will continue to analyze our options to lower project costs. From the inception of the project we realized that the cost of Groundwater Replenishment System water must be competitive with future imported water. We still believe we can produce this water for less than the cost of future imported water. Groundwater Replenishment System water will be the lowest cost new water source available. It will also be the highest quality water available. The Boards of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District are committed to identifying a new source of safe, reliable, pure, drought-proof water for residents of north and central Orange County. It is too early to say whether the cost of the project will hinder its development. That is why we are spending the next year developing and analyzing the viability of this innovative project. We believe that it will be viable. Less than $1.5 million has been spent to date on this project. This is a modest amount for a joint-agency project of this magnitude that has completed the EIR/EIS process and has begun the project development phase. The agencies have been extremely prudent. 4 joxe error ql 0t r C,"w,e,Da and the Omnge C..,SmdxGm Detm t7M 378-3200 • Fax(714)378-3381 - 10500 EIIia Avenue • FounoinValley - Califomia 92708 Over the next year project development and preliminary engineering will continue. The Boards are scheduled to vote on whether to proceed with the final design and construction of the project In January 2001. Recently we have been meeting with Gary Robbins, a reporter for The Orange County Register, to update him on the project cost estimate. We expect his article to run on Thursday, March 2, and wanted to make you aware. His article is focused on the increased costs between the EIR rough estimate and the refined cost estimates coming from the project development phase. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ron Wldermuth, public information officer for the Orange County Water District at(714) 376-3351 or Michelle Tuchman, director of communications for the Orange County Sanitation District at (714) 962-2411, Please keep in mind that we are still in the very early stages of planning. This is the first large application of membrane technology for wastewater purification in the world and there are no roadmaps or examples for us to follow. Cost is obviously a key factor in the success of this project. We will continue to keep you updated as planning for this vital project proceeds. Sincerely, Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Tom Dawes, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District Groundwater Replenishment System A Groundwater %w Replenishment System • Date: February 15, 2000 To: Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Orange County Water District Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors From: Iry Pickier, Chairman Joint Cooperative Committj� The public information team for the GGrrooundwa--ter Replenishment System is making significant strides educating the public and securing support for this important project. Since 1997,the public information team has made more than 300 community presentations and secured support from more than 50 cities, chambers of commerce, countywide groups, environmental and agricultural organizations and individuals. A listing of some of the cities, organizations and businesses that the public information team has made presentations to is enclosed, as well as a list of all the endorsements to date. In the future, I will be providing you with monthly updates on this important project. Please call Ron Wildermuth at(714) 378-3351 if you would like more information. . . CC: Bill Mills Don McIntyre Michelle Tuchman Ron Wildermuth Tom Dawes A pm e(fan of b,,0--9e Caumy Wale'Dm and d,e Omnge Co-my Smualan Darn (714)378-3200 • Fax (7141 378.3381 • 10500 Ellis Avenue • Fountain Valley - California 92708 Groundwater Replenishment System Endorsements American Water Works Association/Cal-Nev Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Section (AWWA) Kansas Club/Leisure World, Seal Beach Anaheim Evening Lions Club Kiwanis Club of Cypress Anaheim Optimist Club Martin Luther Hospital of Anaheim Blue Planet Foundation Mesa Consolidated Water District City of Brea Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce • City of Costa Mesa Orange Chamber of Commerce City of Cypress Orange County Board of Supervisors City of Fountain Valley Orange County Business Council City of Huntington Beach Orange County City Engineers'Association City of Irvine Orange County Farm Bureau City of La Habra Orange County Taxpayers Association City of La Palma Placentia Chamber of Commerce City of Los Alamitos Rainbow Disposal City of Newport Beach Rotary Club of Fullerton City of Placentia Sea& Sage Audubon Society City of Seal Beach Serrano Water District City of Stanton Sierra Club Orange County City of Tustin Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned City of Villa Park Treatment Works City of Westminster Southern California Water Alliance East Orange County Water District Southern California Water Committee Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Surfrider Foundation of Huntington Beach / Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce Long Beach Chapter Greater Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Trammell Crow Company Groundwater Foundation Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce Hall & Foreman, Inc. Groundwater Replenishment System - Public Information Presentations AARP Regional Directors Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce AARP, Garden Grove Fountain Valley Kiwanis Club AARP, Orange Board Meeting Fullerton Chamber of Commerce AARP, Orange Membership Meeting Fullerton Community Advancement Group American Cetacean Society Fullerton Kiwanis American Legion Post 555 Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce Anaheim Beautiful Garden Grove Kiwanis Anaheim Evening Lions Club Greater Anaheim Golden City Kiwanis Anaheim Evening Lions Club Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Anaheim Hills/Yorba Linda Kiwanis Greater Garden Grove Kiwanis Anaheim Public Utilities Board Greater Santa Ana Kiwanis Anaheim Republican Assembly H. Lewis Lake Senior Center Anaheim Women's Club/Zonta Club Hall & Foreman Civil Engineers Apartment Association of Orange County High Twelve/Anaheim Arrowhead Water Hinckley& Schmitt Co. of Calif. Association of California Water Agencies Hispanic Chamber of Commerce AW WA Intemationall Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Brea Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach City School District Board of Brea Senior Center Trustees Buena Park Lions Club Huntington Beach Kiwanis Building Industry Association Inside/Outside Chapman University Investment Real Estate Forum Children's Hospital of Orange County Iranian American Society of Engineers City of Anaheim Irvine Chamber of Commerce City of Cypress Irvine Exchange Club City of Fountain Valley Irvine Exchange Club Sunrise City of Fullerton La Habra Kiwanis Club City of Huntington Beach La Palma Kiwanis City of Irvine La Palma Lions Club City of La Palma Laguna Beach Rotary Club City of Los Alamitos Lions Club,Anaheim Evening Host City of Newport Beach Lions Club, Anaheim Host City of Seal Beach Lions Club, Irvine-Tustin Evening City of Stanton Lions Club, Orange City of Tustin Long Beach Rotary Club Classic Property Mangement McKesson Water Products Costa Mesa Historical Society Merritt Property Management Costa Mesa Senior Center Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce Cypress Kiwanis Club Newport Harbor Exchange Club Cypress School District Board of Trustees North Orange County League of Women Cypress Sunshine Club Voters Democrats of North Orange County North Santa Ana Kiwanis Desk& Derrick Club OC Isaac Walton League Desk& Derrick Club/Flour Daniel Orange Chamber of Commerce Disneyland Orange County American Planning Association District IV Kiwanis Orange County Appraisal Society East Orange County Water District Board of Orange County Business Council Directors Orange County Central Lions Club Groundwater Replenishment System Public Information Presentations (Continued) Orange County Lions Club Soroptimist Women of Yorba Linda/Placentia Orange County Women's Club South Santa Ana Kiwanis Orange Empire Sertoma Club Speak Up Newport Orange Kiwanis Surfrider Foundation, HE/LB Chapter Orange Suburbia Kiwanis The Walt Disney Company Orange Unified School District Tustin Area Senior Center Orchid Club of Orange County Tustin Chamber of Commerce Government Placentia Chamber of Commerce Affairs Placentia Methodist Men's Club Tustin Kiwanis Rainbow Disposal Tustin Lions Rotary Club of Anaheim University of California Irvine Medical Center Rotary Club of Anaheim Hills Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce of Orange Rotary Club of Anaheim Sunrise County Rotary Club of Brea Villa Park Rotary Rotary Club of Buena Park Washington Square Neighborhood Assoc. Rotary Club of Costa Mesa Westminster Chamber of Commerce Rotary Club of Cypress Westminster Kiwanis Rotary Club of Fountain Valley Yorba & Featherly Regional Parks Rotary Club of Fullerton Yorba Linda Rotary Club Rotary Club of Fullerton South Yosemite Water Company Rotary Club of Fullerton Sunrise Rotary Club of Garden Grove Rotary Club of Garden Grove West Rotary Club of Huntington Beach Rotary Club of Huntington Beach Sunrise Rotary Club of Irvine Spectrum Rotary Club of Los Alamitos Rotary Club of Newport Sunrise Rotary Club of Newport-Irvine Rotary Club of Orange Rotary Club of Orange North Rotary Club of Orange Sunrise Rotary Club of Placentia Rotary Club of Santa Ana Rotary Club of Santa Ana North Rotary Club of Seal Beach Rotary Club of Tustin Rotary Club of Villa Park Rotary Club of Westminster/Midway City Santa Ana Kiwanis Santa Ana Unified School District Seal Beach Democrat Club Seal Beach Kiwanis Sierra Club Signal Hill High 12 Club Soroptimist Intemational of Cypress Soroptimist Intemational of Garden Grove 2� 2 0 THOMAS R. MATHEWS a; County of Orange U 1n�1 3W N. FlAWER 5r. o' r Planning & Development Services Department tIF04� MA6010 ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4 S"NP""NA G 9T034 U01S Mr. Don McIntyre, General Manager FEB 17 2000 Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 RE: Designing for Healthy Watersheds Seminars Dear Mr. McIntyre: Beginning in March, the Planning & Development Services Department and the Public Facilities and Resources Department are holding a series of seminars entitled Designing for Healthy Watersheds. Focused on examining opportunities in urban development designs to restore and enhance our watersheds, Dr. Bill Roley of the Permaculture Institute is presenting the programs to four distinct audiences. The seminar series commenced with a February program for County staff members and is extending out in March and April for municipal and special district staff, then to private developers/consultants. The project will conclude in May with a public workshop to summarize the issues and concepts addressed. The first pair of seminars will be held at 8:30 to 11:30 on March 16 and 23 here in the Osborne Building - 300 N. Flower Street in Santa Ana. The second duplicate pair of seminars will be held at 8:30 to 11:30 on March 30 and April 6 at the Dana Point Harbor Youth & Group Facility. Your representatives may select either location when they confirm their registration. To register, leave a message by March 13 with Michael Wellborn at telephone (714) 834-2486, fax at (714) 834-4652, or e-mail at wellbomm@pdsd.co.orange.ca.us. There is no charge for the program. Dr. Roley's seminars will provide a review of the latest planning and design tools found in contemporary watershed management (with PowerPoint and slides) and include frequent Q&A discussions. The "watershed design tools"that will be discussed will also include adaptation and utilization opportunities by local agencies and developers for local implementation to increase the health and functioning of our waterways, the aesthetics of our communities and the enrichment of our natural habitat. If you have any questions or wish to participate in the seminars, please contact Michael Wellborn at 834-2486. Ve tr ou Tho . Ma Director Vicki L. Wilson, Directory Plan ing & Deve pment Services Department Public Facilities & Resources Department cc: Michael M. Ruane Date: March 15,2000 , OMTS Committee Report: Odor Complaints ----------------------------------------------- •---- ----- .FLAN-NO. 1 2000 v$ Jan Feb Mar r f May Jun Jul Augs Oct 11/15 no 12Ill es 116 no Nov Dec plant related 12125 no Total: 0 1 0 0 PLANTN0.2-------------------------------------------- ----- ----- 2000 gg Nov Dec Jan i Feb Mar r If Me Jun Jul Aug11 Sep If Oct If M 1E0 2/3 no 3/4 s 2/10 s 2/13 s2 19 noplant related 2/20 noTotal: 0 2 1 .----n Systems 2000----- -------------------------------- ----- ----- Colleetlo Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct 11/5 12114 1/3 2/8 11/9 12123 113 2/15 11/15 12/28 1/6 2/28 11/15 12/2B 1/10 11/15 1/25 11/15 1/27 11/23 Collection Total 7 Total 4 Total 6 Total 3 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total g:\excel.dlalom\Odor Complaint Log.xis Corona suit Pagel of 3 Corona goes to court over wastewater plant Riverside Press-Enterprise-2/23/00 By Claire Vitucci,staff writer CORONA-Alleging that taxpayers are the unwitting victims of a "multimillion- dollar price-fixing scheme," the city of Corona has filed a lawsuit against the Western Riverside County Regional Waste Authority over its regional wastewater plant. The city alleges that the joint powers authority has attempted to force Corona to use and pay for the sewer treatment plant, though the city treats its own wastewater with several treatment facilities it operates. Corona is not a member of the joint powers authority.Lawyers for the city said Corona applied but was turned down. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Riverside County Superior Court,names as defendants the waste authority and its members, including the Western Municipal Water District, the city of Norco,Home Gardens Sanitary District and the Jurupa Community Services District. Western,Home Gardens and Jumpa declined comment, saying they either hadn't been served with the lawsuit or hadn't reviewed it. "Norco is just a member of the joint powers authority and operates under its rules,"Norco City Attorney John Harper said,adding that he believed Western was the main defendant in the lawsuit. "It(Norco) doesn't have direct liability under the actions of the authority." Arthur Kidman, an attorney representing Corona in the lawsuit,called the regional plant a"$30 million white elephant that should never have been built." "The worst part is that Western is now trying to finance this boondoggle at the expense of Corona residents.Once Western's record of mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty is exposed,the public will demand that Corona's rights be restored." The city contends that it owns but doesn't need the rights to $13.2 million in sewer capacity but has not been allowed by the wastewater authority to sell or lease the rights. The lawsuit alleges that Western--the administrator of the joint powers authority--built an oversized regional wastewater plant despite warnings by Corona that the city didn't need and didn't want to use it. "Now that Western has finally realized that it doesn't have enough httpJ/members.home.net/khulow/waterweb/2-23—corona—suit.htrn 02/28/2000 Corona suit Page 2 of 3 wastewater discharge volume, and consequently enough revenues,to operate their new plant,theyre trying to cover their mistake by developing a punitive rate structure to force Corona taxpayers to pay for their blunder," Ridman said. Corona entered into a contract with Western in 1981. For about $13.2 million,the city purchased capacity rights of nearly 3 million gallons per day from Western to sent its wastewater to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor,or SARI, a regional sewer line. In 1998, after the new plant was built, Western claimed Corona no longer had the capacity rights to the regional sewer line. Instead,its rights were held in the new regional plant,the lawsuit states. In addition, the lawsuit alleges Westem raised Corona's monthly rates eightfold, from$5,703 to$38,228. Corona hasn't received any invoices for the latter amount, said Gary Grant, also an attorney representing Corona in the case. The 1981 agreement stated that the use of the regional sewer line was to be temporary until the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority-- the joint powers authority that manages the regional line--or Western provided alternate facilities for wastewater treatment, the lawsuit states. The watershed authority was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. The regional wastewater treatment plant isn't a suitable alternative because it was built by the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority, not Western or the watershed authority, Grant said. "The city of Corona has built wastewater facilities,and they're able to meet their own internal wastewater disposal requirements through the year 2020 based on population growth" estimates,Grant said. "The city of Corona doesn't need to discharge either to the SARI line or to the regional facility or any other things that may be out there." Instead, the city was holding its rights to the regional sewer line and had hoped to sell them, Grant said.But because of the dispute over the 1981 contract,where the rights actually are and the current payment structure,the city is not able to sell, lawyers said. The city seeks to have the 1981 contract with Western rescinded and that the defendants be ordered to pay Corona the amount of its original investment plus interest.Lawyers for the city estimated Corona's capacity rights to the regional sewer line to be worth about $19.7 million today. http://members.home.net/kharlow/waterweb/2-23—corona—suit.htm 02/28/2000 oil VVA- ENOUGI �4 • �.1 s i I I i 7rEFI � JO QUENCH THE BUSINESS THIRST? hen a major blowout occurred in the other 25 percent of North County's water is A&P pipeline in December,threat- purchased from the Los Angeles—based ening the water supply of 700,000 Metropolitan Water District(MWD).The people in south Orange County,it purchased water comes from the Colorado was front-page news for a week.The Los River via the aqueduct shown on the cover of Angeles Tines and The Orange County Register this issue and from the Bay Delta Area in covered the rupture daily,and most people Northern California.South County doesn't knew there was a problem.But.as Curt Pringle have any significant underground water.They pointed out in his most recent column in this are completely dependent on imported water, magazine,most of them didn't understand the and all of that water flows to them through details of the problem,didn't know where the the 6-foot diameter concrete pipeline that burst pipeline was or where the water in it was in December. coming from or going to.Readers of OC A quick repair response by MWD and METRO Magazine did know. A week before associated water agencies and conservation the break,we published a feature article about efforts by the citizen of Laguna Niguel,Rancho Orange Counry's water infrastructure in which Santa Margarita,San Juan Capistrano and Senior Writer Steve Thomas explained the other South County communities minimized differences between North and South County's the impact of the break. The pipeline was water supplies and pointed out the potential for back in operation seven days after it burst a problem like the one that occurred. and there was enough stored water to make Recapping briefly,North County sits atop coffee and take showers in the meantime.But a natural undergroundsmmge area containing the break highlighted the importance of more than a million acre feet of water. (An water in people's everyday lives and put a acre foot is 326,000 gallons of water,enough spot light on the significance of water infra- to supply a family of five for a year.)Seventy- structure issues. five percent of the water used from the Spectrum In the second pan of his series,Thomas area north comes from wells that tap the examines the critical importance of water to aquifers—water-bearing layers of sand and Orange County businesses,looking at how gravel—beneath the Santa Ana River.The several major companies use water. United States,'It just keeps recycling in the environincnt.It's a perfect system. "Water is the mein conaument in the dying process.We couldn't operate Mason,it.We use 17 pounds of water for each pound of carpet we produce.That adds up TO 700,"gallons a dry. Because of aspersion,we will be using 900,01)p gallons a day by March" Royalty produces 500,000 square yards of carpet every month using two manufacturing proussea Sewn-adi iondoUncoutiouous dying machine handle the bulk of the output Smaller bablaw and specialty carpets arc dyed in an old- Cauhiondpiece-dying process. 'Thepiece-dying process uses a tremendous ...at of ormer;'says Jones."You can't just put a big blotch of dye on the carpet it has to be woody end deeply WHial,Wow is Ore medicos we use to transfer the dyestuff to the uget The carpet is dyed in Urge steel vOM We fill a vat 2 a 1/2 times for each piece dyed.TO keep from e shocking the carpet,we fill the vat add the dye, e hag Main half.refill,drain half and so form until the piece is dyed and rinsed.We also use e lot of wow in our continuous dying machines, but not as much proportionately!' Recogtuzing me value of Orange County'a 'e water resources,Royalty Is a lender in the use f.:• : of mclaimed water.'We use about 20 parent reclaimed water now and will be Orange County businesses are thirsty.Economic athletes competing in the long- using 80peroentwimivsixmonms disunm maathon of success may rmdaconsmnt Bow ofhfghyualiry wow to keep ; -.+:? mw;'ayslmteswhoisenintema. moving forward past financial mile markers.Without it they'd collapse like ovedrevM �s,,,, r tiaMBYkreamexpvtonmemNntrial mnnars in me road.From car washes to cellar manufacturers,from semiconductor aTrl 9 use of ineycled wazre wow. chip companies to golf courses,Orange County businesses crave water.The most "We are using ubmtg12,000 a universal solvent,water is essential for all kinds of cleaving operations It is Also month right row by a on,trimmed! invaluable as a medium in which TO blend ingredients,whether in food proceumg in wawan flash ing me anvimvment industrial compounds,and as a tansfm odium,carrying substances such as,dye into , atthetausetions:,JOnas my,.'The Me fine interstices of fabric or fertiliser down to the mats of plats ' reclairnd weer also works better Every busineen needs water for its employees to drink and wash these hands But F t forwhatwedo" for many businesses,water is integral to what they do.Concoction companies need .t a According to Jones,me Irvine water TO dairy down dust and compact fill a they mmape the Southern California yh �J Bunch Wow District ueasswaste- h0lsmacommodate highways Arm homes ladsrapers and nurseries couldn't opeate _P t a' water to Royalty's exactspecift- wimoutnt Heels mdrcsomsam dependenton rtnmlust sothattM'vguesM Oan dank w 1( mtions,providing an ideal dying and beme,but to fill their swimming owls and famusia,to mop Me Boors,wash the J¢ medmin. There Are so army con- windows,operate aircomidowng systems and keep me grass green . ;.. % a stituentsinwaw—salts and meals Manufacturing companies such as House fads in Garden Grave,Covenant Systems TP - —andachoveeHeembowtMdye in Newport Beach and Royalty Carpet Mills in levee require hundreds of thousands a azis.Tbessomenu mtofdyein Ore or even millions of gallons a day for manufacturing Operations. p sameamountof wawwdlco area 'The issue ofwater ava0abifry,is so(undamentalwsite location that it's classifiedt different color depending on the on a.'early check off'issue:'says Scot Ofmlie,president of the Orange County =` hardness or softness of me water. Bai cCamof."Companies maz red Urge amounts of..Made There is a wide variation in the of availability very early in the process of winnowing down potential locations.If a composition of potable water in mere isn't enough anew,companies won't come:' : Irvine.The Colorado River water So where does the vat stream ofwater mat lubricaw Me Orange County economy we gaUtlemmmterh muchhadc come from?Why doesn't it on out? than de well water we get in me winter.The water that mines down from Me Delm 'There ham'[ban a new drop of wow aeaed U the last billion years;'uys Keith U much higher in Organic compounds.All that variation hum us became we have to Cmfidge,aasaiate gvtmAl manage fma,MuNcipal WBOYI imittofOringe County djun me transient clemiWswe usemanmilfy to by and keep the dye comer maincrt (bIWDOC),the agency met distributes import water in the county."When we go "Its beauty of the recycld now is that the district can shoot it in Our specifications. out to tag,to school kids,I sell mein that the waste may just drank from the fountain We sell Most how many pans per million we want of cahma.iron,potassiumandmegna- OightbethtsensewaterNapoleonusedmtakeabath.They get a kick out that ¢into sand they give us consistent levels.It is very,very repeatable once you get it nailed The water Conaxunt uses TO rinse its uttranddem semiconductors,me chips that down and mat helps us tremendously in gain much betty consistency with our colors. wink the electronic magic of broadband wireless communication.is me more water Our rdye me,is much lower with reclaimed wane That saves us time and money. me discount drink. "Our ultimate god is to recycle our own wow intemdlY;'Jones says."We have It's a good thing water doesn't weer out AaOdivg as Robert Beim president of test equipment on site now which uses the latest mimofiluatior technology.It can the American Society of Civil Engineers,Orange County is essentially a dared, clean up black industrial wrote water in One step,making it pure enough W Link.We receiving an average of only 14machine,a min each yea,Without the muval citcdetion plan m be recycling 60 to 80 percent of our water imtemally by net Year. That will of am,ttuovgh over,wnh and sky—a system aided by me ingenuity of generations aeve us tremendously on Me coat of water purchases and even more an the cast of Southern California wow managers—Orange County baimssu would and up like waste wow dispoal.We have two meters on our in line Bud it is actually more Me dinosaurs,keAld over with dark corporate bona bleaching in the son. expensive to dispose Of our effluent den it is to buy fresh waw.Recycling wtemzlly "Water never goes away,"says Chuck Jones,plant manager at Royally Carpet carmoare on rasa as ® 06 METRO I FEBRUARY 10, 2000 LU V UN 1 U ALISO. y 1 alisoviejocommunity.cont tl � II'i , HE.. OZLD ` t i Q m �r�c�vNz�sre� � The water Conexant uses to rinse its dh ultramodern semiconductors, the chips $135* that work the electronic magic of broadband 1 wireless communication, is the same water the dinosaurs drank. will.1. I IJ will also save us the cost of having to Upgrade st,comams�atiin on.sa uAs we ccashxpand." Caeeaent Systems,Ina,thadynala year ge End anaumiocM rise 900 per ant split th from Rockwell jot industrial International a year ago and sew its snick riu 900 percent sine dstab a another major industrial water<oreal to "A stable supply executive, director y water is critical"Large manufacturing pmcoming says Richard Bluth,executiveonsW a of ant(whties."t.argeuringwuld in incoming under quality could s1.7 opmdogatonpointwhererday a tits Ne would a hlocatsN" Conexant sWius bythe fiinsRanch Water Dier par aymiudis use Beech location. Y The water is Applied by the Irvine Ranch Water District and elused for irrigation. FtLei� rr domestic use Andbuilding the ghneaingandcoutes Mcleannsazwellafrsas they ova 479 d2 a,h"Watz s and in the menu cleaning nog pmccss s is rep silicon numeersrous as times. The r u mmodi(tibait a1>d through the process line.The cleaning process is designed numerous times.The equipment that performs the claming processes is designed to limit the amount of A�St1 water thu myand onexabe usedmaxhnse Wale ruseopumivuonnmindusny- thrde priority end Co1lan international rnaonpal se m several orfmiwater-use optimisation orn projects ppII1u throughuEMmany H.otermaeorchip anuaturesor(ocuud research organimtion rnn'"1 III Nminyonesmany other inside a chip manufacturing Anyone who has been inside achiP mmu(xtudne fmiliaY and seen whim-suind technicians gliding around in a glass-sealed environment,knows how important[ cleanliness is to the industry.The smallest speck of dust or dirt can modiste with the functionality of the sensitive devices that make cell phones and computers work. Comxant employs reverse osmosis(forcing water through a membrane so that all impuriries are left behind),deimuration and high-tech filters to create the ultra pure water needed for in advans<d manufacturing processes. "We can identify changes in water source through ou-site imtrumentation;'says Bluth."We hive designed avpurification systems 0deal with the real,ofclnrenedsbcs that come form different sources of incoming water' mOf METRO I FEBRUARY 10. 2000 I a , I Moving one aep;aquip ad of Royalty,Conexant redaims some water internally for emissionmsiste equipment. ssich sist Bluder"Tive newmethodsofseduengrpdwuzeruu turesodndusuy research;'says BluN.'"fhe availability a(a stable,good-quality source of wafer in r r r Orange County has been a great riot that has helped enable interlining success in `. PayingTop Dollar manufacturing aver the past 30.yean" - With 2,100 employers at its Newport Beach site.Careful is a major comparison GOLD DIAMONDS of the local woromy.The company's dependence on water for continued operation and its efforts to conserve and reuse water both emphasize the value of this �• '�% ROLEX WATCHES preciorrabource. 1 A privately held company with SIM million in revenue in 1999,Prudential _ as a 0 -0722 Overall Supply is another local company heavily dependent on water,Founded in _ 1932,the company operates 19 commemial laundries in six slates,employing 2000 a a people.They have 179 employes in Orange County—80 in their Irvine laundry and 99 in main cmpomte headquarters. "Water is obviously critical to what we,do:says Lee Terry,a manager with Prudential,"We an,using about 27,000 gallons of waterper day currently in our Irvine laurrdry.That amounts to about 9.75 million gallons per year." Prudential recently received an award from me Irvine Reach Water District for grwtat improvement in water management by a commercial account. "We reduced our water consumption by 2 million gallons a year by going to a low ' . Cautious.,...Je ,rR, Water might acfuallybe cheaper m a tlroughE'" 1 ast)ear,ta Nlnawirder asuwsualydry arH sofartts'mmyseasrn' Lhasbeeranyme,put m In fact nmelostsuoomeCreep.Court, has received the lowest amount of rain ever recorded for the period. And nova scientists at the Jet Propulsion laboatory In Pasadena have released satellite data which they say predicts a probir,ed period of dry i weather for Southern C.4cmin is - - �' The satellittime,s show cooler than normal water temperatures in `me Eastern Paclf c:and the scientists say decades of parched weather {I could resuh.So,amwin headed Into a drought? And if so,what will the consequencesbe? f -Sum,I'm concerned about the low rainfall levels;says John Senate, general manager of me Santa Margarita Water Comm,one of the South County districts most affected by ttre reform pipeline break:'h is already. having an effect.MWO planned to provide 1.72 million acre feat to Southern California during the past 12 monthsand they asidegupselling - 1,96 million a sufeet,70 billion gallons morethan they had budgeted.TRu,, haverf seen Na drop m demand for imported wearNey wale one,during thewinre. 'It low rainfall continues,it could affect water availability,but I think we can continue to meet full diamond by purchasing water from other sources through MWD'ssystem,"Schate says. "m 1998 we bought 1,000 acre foal of water from Western Water Company,a private company traded cm NASDAQ that brokers water transfers.That tleal actually power us S50,000 to eause Weslem precedent premluow t user he deal pipelines. Theywanred to establish a precedent and snow that the tleal could be done.Under S T 'S normal carapaces,Marx pipelines are fail and Nay charyeahighfee to - wheatwater through theRsystem.Western carit afford 1.doit.one oar The uncommonly perfect dining experience. basis.During a drought.though,there would on,excess capacity in the pipelines and it would be much cheaper to move the water. Strange as It Whether it's fresh seafood or USDA Prime Aged Steaks, may sound,we might actually save money by buying from Western during Scott'scarries on the tradition of San Francisco"Southern a drought compared to what we nomaly pay MVD.' - - California Style" lunch,dinner and Sunday brunch. 'It has bean very dry so far this year,and it is predicted to be way dry Centrally located in the Orange County theater district forth.real of the season,"mays Keith Coolidge.assaiato general manager Scott's offers pre-and post-theater dining and private and 'of the Cronies County Municipal Water District."Butthatislustin Saner semi private dining rooms for business meetings or social Galihrnia.You haveto remember we get waterfrom amuch vntler area gatherings from 15 to 500. mere has been plants of rare In Central California where the Dena water We are only a short walk to the Performing Arts Center comes from and theyjust of four feet of Snow in the Simms which makes and offer complimentary valet parking. it more like a normal year for them in terms of precipratlon — tts1mm�trt�l "And of course the water we get tram the Colorado River comes from S;o IS a completely different watershed in the Rocky Mountains. Besides which _ OD ... they have 50 million acre feet stored of the nverbehind various dams. So r wa aregCta Ne M1rtwheurg.E+an ermrfal¢lon'h Oval.Carny,vregwkfnY For reservations till: face drought-like conditions anytime soon.^OCM 7141979-.2400 revue our. kyG{P TM^ wary-wvn amen, rm nuurr -hra[rbmvddaav Nnuu.svwrealbe war" Davitl Tabb f^+frtorsnso,huni..doxneraeaedarrm - wo. t. 714.748.2250 .Weill Make That Special Occasion Extra Speciall .. = �': ' _ amrvamaayarvcteaaaydtonnn. a Upgrade Your Web ' �i California ` Business With Web ) Server Co-location K=m= Get Started I I Why Dynamic Concepts - - •d - �: :� r Dmam c concepts has been providing ncuvork'ng and •Increased Control of Your Web Sire software sdwons for over 20 F Oran Co p •Direcr Ememet Connection yaars n ge ry •Multiple IP Addresses Arid we haW me engineer � /' •j ing experience and talent to •Optional DNS and Email Service help you oiler a ro loaad - •Optional Tape Roauon Services arse.voluuan m your tech- � •More Disk Space-No Shared Sernces Mal requirements As your Income,same and •149 Serser M amcrirtg neeN increase you treed a tram poor car •l oared in Viso Y<IdOrange County mam, partner who under- irnnN bacdelergrnt,"Ternm)s."Ids ddargcm is mo¢upcnsivc but it allows us sands now to help you vale to knack three rime cycles off each load.It saves energy and time as well as Water. •COXu and UUNkTu Connections We get more cloths done faster with less water and electricity." me technical side of your web TIba company poesida sued Ineares word:claw.for a wide cargo,refvdusuia uichaieg A co-located web server is the perfect mod business it vision faod since,trades amI manufacturing.Despite the iifform,aeupseions...rearmad, for hosting a Web sim on fire Incomes the clodus Pmdential buftdersallhaveonethinginconurwnaeywmeimothelaun- Whencanparedmseningupaserverat Call NTZ1FJow day duty This sequence cri de compvty'sbiggal water pehlcm. your location,you at :M mouxandx of "H<rt in Its, we have nevcrhul a problem with supply;'Lee says."But we face dollars on senerin setup and recurring r I I 1 r ever-utu asng problems with discharge It is a critical issue for us now and connection du a without additional or visit on the web at, getting mote critical all the mine is the sum impacts stricter mquirtments fortmaing r%es www,dynamic.netadm wastewater. Dynamic yna icaCon headaches. Using she ^laundered garments relrau a lot of solids,m the wash water is heavy in salts Dan"wl Concepts "Server Co-loation Wrtn yateawn p,you ow- andmeals.Rightnow,wewtwrwanewawrfortypicnlpollu,ants—oilomgrease Plan"will allow you m inn mission critid mom c egdi-ed saner pea can and some metals—but mere is ewr cremating pressure to trot for dissolved solids CPU incursive Inumec server applications se Iugnly-sohyc solutions .ad salts as well. on your own web server. and Weiacressest vedomunce. "We also create a amain ofsat-heavy waste waterwhen we mftencur wash water, W the pe feer,somuon for web 'Ito soft water is much better harshening garments but the softening process leaves With our web server co-laotion plan you stet publishn,drialmos.cua .home solution behind which baser,be disposed of.It isn't feasible fin as to remove have complete coneml over your serer, mvl serwce,summng all the dissolved solids from our waste water right now,but that is what is cottung the server software. CGI coMrguracons mMu and mum mom. downeheline:Theanitationdistreason'twantalt-heavywwerbeeauutheywant and implementation.You provide the web to Whom it she saltier it is the haNer is is Mclean up. terser and we provide the furniture! "We am comentiy hauling brim to disposal site man we Bbersi0e laundry instead of funding it out through discharge pipes.We M also eapenmenting with new filtration We WIII host any type of serer you need ME equipment in Riverside to eliminate that brine haul" including UNIK NT and Apple Matinmsh. Water use varies in different puts of the county.Them is mote industrial use in Call us and our co-location experts will .n North County,more residential use,proportionamly,in South County.But South het a co-loau a Web server according seer car rJ a 9494 8soo County has large commercial users,too. P y° 8 Hrry: rya®q rm¢„u "We have three golf courses in our area;'says Chuck Roy a supervisor with to your bummer business strategy. Oadteasels awwdyna. the Moulton Niguel Water District"Mission Viejo Country Club,El Niguel a...r„•t.rp� ��..W. Golf Course and Allow Niguel Golf Course are some of the biggest water users at Mf1P0 r rf Bnu— - f000 y. e 51 Arizona' r _' HQME` Uf : r r • BMRSGUIDE I ResolutionIs Your New Year s I I I g .e Th�Loughts determine what you want. in the district.It takes a lot of water to keep all that gross green Nctions determine what you get! 'Two thirds of the water they use is reclaimed,the other third is pombla Hey tine reclaimed m the fairways,pouble on the greens.Our reclaimed weer has a higher soh Has your hard work and effortgiom you allyou desirel content and the hybrid gran on the greet,is mo delicale to withstand that concentration. Do you want to arhimeyourgoah,and 'The Holiday lrm in Laguna Hills artd the Government Services AdminLstratlon bavn the time to mjoyyour turcess€ (GSA)building in Upon Niguel an,two other large water consumers;'Roy says. The seven-story GSA building,that opened in 1914 and encompasses more than •Enter the New Millennium with unlimited earring potential a million square feet of hall,once and storage space,illustrates due complex water . Increase your present earnings...spare-time,part-time,full-lime usage of large office towcra. Own our own business We have half-a-down different water meters," ete "says Conrad&set,aplannerlesti y mator at the federal government complex,"We use water for irrigation,building we are looking for entrepreneurial maintem ice,Instant;and cooling,fur sprasklersystemsand domestic uses-rasuoom. and drinking water-for the 4000 people who work here.We use about 50,000 gallon. people we can teach, train and develop. month,all told. "We amount using reclaimed water for impure in 1998 anal it has saved at a lot - ofmmay/'says Esser."When we were using feasible our irrigation water bills ranged between S8,000 and$10.000 a month.With reclaimed they range between S3.5011 and S3,700. Like the GSA and many local companies,area water agencies arc working it) eunterve end reuse water,maximizing Orange County's supply of H2O. W E L L N E S S "Our ultimate goal is to make Orange County self-sufficient in terms of water;' i says William R.Mills Jr.,general manager of the Orange County Water District CONCEPTS (OCWD),the Meng Nat oversees distribution and quality of groundwater in Non], County.'m Hoot end.Mills aM his assaiats devised the Groundwater Replenishment -- Project Approved by the voters last March.the Sd00 million recycling progem will absorb Qpercent of the county's waste water,transforming it via a three-stage JOIN OUR TEAMI purification process into water pure enough todrink.The purified water will be piped NURNINI TU/ETNER,IUILIIN/TU/ETNER,SUCCEEUINC TURNER. upstream along the Santa Ana River to settlement basins in Anaheim where it will peteolate beck down into the underground reservoir.From there it will be drawn back up-even Cleaner after Missing down through send end gravel that nap bometin end t i I t on.v+a•ar — '-,� ad in will lprovide 6 billong llontycommshwaierforfa families�- Businesses nOranMe e, willtyeach year. ion gallons of fresh water for families and businesses in Oange sea water will MigsbelmanFture. water will also contribute to satisfying the martyrs water needs in the near Future. • "1lte hold-up with accreditation has been the membrane technology;'he says."It f - has been coo slow and expensive to be a viable solution.But we are getting Inner mod 1 \ e better membranes cheaper and cheaper as more compwwrs get into the Market.Over just the last three years we have seen membrane costs cut in half.Over the pest 25 ` years,energy costs also iatM with reverse osmosis membrane ratification have been reduced to 25 pereent of what they once were TWenty five years ago,it took 600 r v i pounds of pressure per square inch to fora water through do eliminating the silts.Now it takes Jun 150 pounds per square inch Thee greatly reduma theamount of energy consumed or the process.making it more economically unable. •Pr m 1 Increasing storage capacity is another way of increasing water supply.Typically, a in Orange County and Sammons Criforbia as a whole,there is much momwater •Cubs ��, -.fir } available during the rainy winter months then during the dry summer months,ad much •Large .e 1c more drat billions of gallons of water go to waste,flowing rapidly out to am without providing any benefit To ME,community.All the.wster that cad he rrommodeted •Free i is captured in reservoirs and Underground storage areas but,until recently,capacity bsFan severely limited. That willchangs Mamb till when the Metropolitan Water { District dedicates the new Fast Side Reservoir in Riverside County.With a capacity •P - of 800,000 acre feet it will hold mare water Bran all the other surface reservoirs in southern California combined providing a vast storehouse for surplus water.OCM ►t PUSHING PROP 13 NLi - t�sti . r Proposition 13 is emerging as the holy grail of Congo County water me$1.976llion Ingiative,w ichh will beency officials and others,canceea d rated up or down March axcel>tlenal opportunity to address waWoamppiy and water- quallry Issues statewide,and especially in Soubem California. "Proposigon 13 is amust forOan9a County.'Men Robert Berm,packend ----------.---.---- of Me AmeflemSociety of Civil Engineers.'A reliable,high-qualhy water supply S crRical Wthe watty'scomlued examined Pron emy rod bu5ress Isyourphone , Luak tO for rrrpnnsi.e, grown. Paco.13 previders$276 million in funding apeoRcally for Orange nliabic cnmmumcatimv+ County water projects.In all likelihood.we will receive a good deal of .slut.....soch a.: adds innal money in wmpetitive grants and loans.- system g "Proposition 13 is an attempt to build a hollstle appeoaeh to California a°" Teinsn"" water issues, says Ronald B.Unsky,ExecuWe director of Me National ' money vo:mmnvnc:a:.ve"rani Water Research Institute in Fountain Valley.9t breaks may deem previous decades of Bark&Aid samier sW Orange County water nomes.- murvauc,a"s On aper- rot basis,Orange County shoud reaceive$224.6 million of L..b n;.e inns the$1.97 billion command!in Me initiative,"says Kent,Coolidge,associate general manager of the Munden al Water District of Orange County.'So we g cv,eu cv,<m•:vv;�.,:;o,,, are definitely recolving cor fair shag Sat BEAR for groundwater roperdshment or r 1 ant clean-upm thnSama Ana Watershed is$235 million.Four miglen dollars Is set ackm to study the pollution problems In Huntington Edwin.Another come".ei Te;roMne $22.5 million will come to Orange County for Flood control projects:" you money ;siMue;C'n Thewatesb;etl xsQmerantmanaa'kespeeMybrgxatandro OramJe County because 751ercem of de water tsetl by 2 million county nfvms con;as tram wells which tap the underground water in the basin.The S235 million will be used W tleal with groundwater Wllubso problems antl inject mere Stanton .wg O:r.,rte and reclaimed Water into ale natural Underground reservoir. In addition to WIMER:guaranteed funding,we are eligible to compete for another$200 million in funding set aside forme six-coumy Southern eompnea,;n xrv�re California area.Coolidge adds. "Our share of that money will go for -- ,mrmua,lrll everything from water conservation antl recycling projects to entering up San Juan and Aliso Viejo Creaks, xe cornea' "On top of Mal we wilt massive indirect berefes from projects in Other parts Of thesentesuch asthe Safe Cranking WatwProgrdm,which leverages A. Rod kderal dollars for every,stetedoter.and the Bay Darla Water Management Program.The Bay Delta Program Includes a total of$250 milion to clean up and wnect problems in the Della.which have limited the amount of .« water avallable to Soulhem Cormanda When complete,the project should result man adddione1125,000 acrefeetof available water.'Shimne Delta is one of Orange County's three main sources of water,the increase will Lill a r " hanefa local families and businesses.OCM mOC METRO I FEBRUARY ter. 2000 Urban Economic Development Threatened by EPA Proposal NLCLeader Says lowing the witnesses' state- offsets either from other dis- behavior by those comprising sources." ^l events were largely directed to chargers (e.g.. industries) or the economic base afoot notions "On the one bond the agency whether EPA has authority from nonpoint sources located in cities. requires costly strategies to TMDL Rule under the Clean Water Act to the same segment of impaired The whole notion of purches- address overflows; and on the Must Change regulate nonpoint sources ofpol- water. The assumption is that ing effects, Nielsen explained, other, issues permits to these laterals,runoff from farms,con- offsets will be purchased-cities puts cities-or at least their tax facilities only if they buy offsets b Carol Kocheisen fined enamel feeding operations will pay for the pollutant control and/or ratepayers - in the -all without any financial help r and timber activities that pol- activities of others, and accept untenable position of having to tram the government mandating lute the nations waterways. responsibility for their effective- finance the pollutant control ro q l the re uirsments,"he said. A pngasal by the Eirvirom In response, EPA Assistant ness - rather than installing activities of private, for-profit Nielsen recommended that mental Protection Agency(EPA) Administrator for Water Charles prohibitively expensive equip. entities, many of which will be could jeopardize urbanco economic Fox indicated that while there men) at municipal facilities la located outside the municipal Congress should tell EPA to development unless action is was certainly,about the agency's reduce their own pollutant leads. boundaries. If EPA lacks revise and re-propose the TMDL taken to change the current Ian- authority to require permits Offsets and polluant trading authority, he continued, it is regulations to reflect more aceu- guage related b7b1a1 Maximum from large confined animal feed- raise a whole series of questions here. Nowhere does the law rawly reel world circumelances Daily Use! (TMDL) rules, ing operations (CAFOs), nmoff for cities,the NIA witness said. authorize the agency to desig. and to allow further public cone. according W city advocates. from farms - and to a lesser How do we identify appropriate new cities"as surrogate author- counts on what is now a very Testifying on NLC's behalf, extent, from forestry operations polluters and their pollutants? ities to ensure attainment of flawed proposal. Eau Claire,Wis. Council Presi- - are outside the parameters of is there any confluence between water quality objectives from At o minimum, offsets arc dent William Nielsen told the the law. municipal discharges and pollu. sources ofpollutants not regulnl- inappropriately applied to )louse Water Resources Subcom- Of concem to the nation's Cants in runoff from farms, ad by the law." municipalities and should - at mittee last week, The EPA's cities, Nielsen told the commit- ranches, forests, and mines? "umber," the Council Presi- Mat-be discretionary for cities. proposed TMDLrules, if not tee,is'who will bear the prawn- Even EPA Assistant Adminis- dent explained, "city officials Furthermore,he said, apply- amended, will severely limit dersnt responsibility for attain- trator Fox admitted, 'Without believe the proposed TMD1, ing TMDIa to municipal growth and economic develop- ment ofwater quality standards: adequate, accurate information, rates will nullify virtually every stormwaler discharges merely meat in urban arena, obstruct those over whom there is stale- trading won't work." agreement reached by three fed- compoynls the problems of a compliance with urban wet Cory control because they fall 'T'he imposition of, what in era] advisory committees' to program that already has too weather mandates, shift the within the purview ofthe law,or effect is a'zero discharge'policy," address urban wet weather many unrealistic requirements. financial burden for pollutant those whose contributions cause Nielsen told the committee, problems." The Council Presi- Them municipal storwater pro- reductions to tonal tox and continued n cr unattainenl of "sends a'no growth'message to dent pointed out that-about the grimy both Phase I and Phase ratepayers, and generate end- water quality standards?" every city bordering an impaired time the Phase 11 cities will mm. If, should be exempt from leas litigation." Nielsen, a member of NLC's waterbody." "Such a policy,"he plete their stmer water program TMDLs for the foreseeable In the opening salvo on the EENR Steering Committee,else continued, "will preclude any planning and begun implem an- proposed TMDL regulations-on expressed serious reservations growth or major redevelopment talon,TMDLac will be sunerm, future. which EPA received over 30,000 about the concept of pollutant in already developed areas and posed,creating a whole new set .Over the fast 12 yeas NLC comments - members of the trading-a hallmark of the EPA force growth and expansion to ofcriteria.' members participated in the Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. proposal, unpolluted areas." With respect to combined and Sherwood Reehlert (R-N.Y.1, For a municipal facility (a While industrial dischargers sanitary sower overflow romedi. Combined Sewer Overflow seemed mostly concerned about publicly awned treatment may find it more cast effective to state requirement%,Nielsen told (Decatur, lit. Councifinember the potential impact on agricul- works)to increase discharges by move their operations to a more the committee that-cities cannot Same John);Smrmmater Phase tune and forestry operations. 20 percent or mope - to weram- pristine waterbody rather than comply with federal directives to 11 (Port Lauderdale Mayor Jim With the exception of the chair module growth or to comply with seek oftols, cities cannot role- redirect excess wet weather Naugle); and Sanitary Server man and Rep.William Pascrcll regulations addressing pollu. sale,he said. "What is more,"he flows to treatment facilities Overflow (Butte/Silver Bow, (D-N.J.) (sec related story on tants from combined or sanitary continued hve are dismayed that while simulteramusly being pre- Mont. Chief Executive Jack H.R. 3570, the Urban Wet sower overflows-it would have a federal agency would write eluded from doing an without Lynch) Fedeml Advisory Com- Weather bill),the questions tot- to obtain one-to-one-and-a half regulations encouraging' such obtaining offsets from other miffeea two funding streams for munici- pal et$1weather programand $1.5 Wet W� MOW Progwallms Need b $1 billion and $1.6 billion tion of numerical effluent limits policy, including granting cities citizen suits for certain un avoid- lively,for fiscal gran and cities rThese by card w1eim on municipal stormwater dis- up to 15 years to complete mm- able overflows.As with the CSO funds in grants m de a These charges and;authorize a:three- Pgsncewith the requirements of policy, the measure would Pro- funda.would be made available "Nowhere is there-a greater - year$3 billion grant Program to the polity. vide:16:years for cities.to com- for.. plan. .., -. need to strengthen the Clean help ..finance municipal wet - plate compliance with any new sixtti tion of f design,and can- Water Act than in the area of weather initiatives. . - rules cept,t ra of facilities to iflows . .$OOII�'SeYlef OYeIHeWS�SSOsI horn separate or metro] flow, ,Water wet weather programs," - from separate storm sewer sy,- . said Reps. .Steven IATourette CoWiied SeWlf OW&W3 IM) The measure wouldalso set Stommyaler tams or combined and/or sani- (R-Ohio)end BiRPascrell,Jr.(D- basic parameters for any federal tary sewers; NJ) as.they introduced:-H.R. EPNs current policy with: :requirements for.dealing.with H.R: $570 clarifies Congrav- •.planning and implementa- 3570, the Urban Wet Weather respect to combined sewer over- sanitary sewer overflows. In the sional intent with respect to.. .lion of wet weather control mea- _ Priorities Act of 20OOr in.the flow.was developed in conjunc, absence of a national policy on municipal--stormwater die surer and management pme- House of Representatives, The lion with affected municipalities SSOs, cities confront wide- charges by re-emphasizing that tines;and, P-Posal,. designed to address and other stakeholders and pm- spread inconsistency between cites are;inquired to use Best • development and imple- critical urban wet weather mulgatedinl994. Thatpolicyis and among regioms on SSO Management Practices CBMPs) mentationi of urban watershed issues—combined and.euitery now tieing threatened:by inam. requirement& to the Maximum Extent Pmcti- management lane sewer overflows and municipal sisteut interpretations and . While EPA convened a fedeIr cable (MEP) and not to meet P e atormwator programs,was-b-. �. • ye million over the aeon cited a coalition of local m¢easing reluctance m apply al advisory,committee and is numerical:discharge standards. three years for implementation by gDv- its Provisions by federal and working on national rules, the The measure also defines MEP of wet weather.demonstration eminent organizations;'indud- state iegalstore Cities have existing framework of the Clean to exclude construction of faa1i- . ing NLC "Protects The a m= would codify 'already. spent significant Water severelyto Haifa the ties W treat urban stormwater City officials should secure EP& current combined sewer re.ources to implement CSO workable ability to develop a runoff _ commitments from their mem- P%lei 1M1P1*'"t with the pot- workable policy. H.R. 3670 bars of Congress to support,co- overflow (CSO) policy, require icy and now need the force of would set parameters within Fun&g sponsor, and enact H.R. 3570. tent(with the CSO polity) law to protect their investments. which the agency would develop uirements for sanitary sewer Action o the Senate is entici- r�l prof tion would provide that appropriate regulations,s finin The Urban Wet Weather Pri- paled shortly s overflows,. prohibit the.impoxi- ..protection by codifying the 1994- ring protections for cities from ,it,. Act of 2000 authorizes � 4 I06Y,Awunr+y14,2000 TWta¢R-PrAY * TreatimpM plants: : re faked. , . a 1 soar..' UOY wn� Fe& send plea agreement, g bankruptcy. uAdar Tham.1,48 - _ plea he$4.4 million lion co a only after to pay 9.4 . pay the$4.4 m0lion fine only after liy� a0 tnsditors are paid itilmll, with g By mere P.otrls ... • - The fede;4 ggvea®ent's eii. /-��� 1' will rank ahead iquly of those.:ot ,r V some of Johmsona,exaFu6iveq,tn- A private uh"Idy companylkat nm eluding Glenn.Kelly Johnson,VY o more than 200 small sewage treat SEWAGE,frmn Gl .. ..._ sill fares criminal dwgm Rest- ment plants inUndsiana and five der- ........................ .................•_..... .. . tution,to the homeowners willbe er states admitted'Thursday it viehl. and than assured Loui®etia regula- considered a p claim.. ed federal environmental laws and torsthe company had the expertise paid before general unsen agreed to pay a erimina fine of$U to manage and maintain the sewer million, the Plea agreement¢ ¢7. million, the largest such penalty ever systems in.southern Louisiana, The companies,based m`Ms- inposedmLouWana .. . US.Justice Department officials mpp4 pleaded guilty before" euc said District Judge Morey Sear hrtldw eabeldiarie pleaded guilty to conepa- In a November 1998 civil set Urlesna. r :c..•• ing to violate the Clean Water Ant demeng the companies agreed to 'These companies knOOAVy and also agreed to pay $100,090 to compty wifh'the Clean Water Act,' failed to piovide,bewage Qi nt homeowners affneW by the subdue, but later inspections of 78 facilities services to th62atizena` 1tllree dard treatment plants.The comps- found that none were meeting fed- communities, j0pardil1bg.Ih else,which operated plants in Tam eral-requirsments, officials said health and safety(("'aerd Lola J. daux and Houma,admitted they an- The companies were discharging Schiffer, ae®sten0attorney general riched themselves and their exeea- large quantities of potentially for Environment AM Natural"$e- tives at customers'experpe and faked harmful pollutants m local waters, sources at the JuetkE DepsrtM0t, lab reports to regulators to hide the streams and bayous and introdue- 'rheynowpaytheprice." plants'substandard operations ing raw sewage and sewage sludge Randy,A" the EPA ageat-in From 1991 to 19M Johnson Proper- into the environment charge o� the agencya crirniioel ties bought 4elitiee In March, a federal .judge ap- investigation dtvieion in Ralgn .. pointed a receiver to operate the Rouge, ssA'ihe fine was,the FA* .................... companies when they filed for signfi®ntlebied n a�.na. -- - Cos anncics LimcB Orange County's 13 watershed area pour into five major waterways WASHINGand many smaller ones that drain into the Pacific. Bacteria levels are OUT TO S f I# often high where these waterways,fouled by urban runoff and sewage spills,empty into the ocean. The 29-mile San Gabriel Rher Bees ham the San Gabriel The Santa Ana Rher begins more Van 100 miles awry in Mountains to the Pack between Ong Beach and Seal the San Bem.e ino Mountains.V receives n off from cities Beach.The firer drains about 635 square sales of Los and dairies before it empties into the Pacific in Buabnglon Angeles,Orange and San Bernardino conies,hone to Beach.Its watershed includes more than 2,650 square miles about 2.5 million people. in San Beenam era.Rrmnode and Orange counties, -- home to more than 4.5 million people. r. 1.' BANA AM PIYEIL•. orru ift � ala 3 did�-- � ,r' • � - (: ---- ... � rAa• �4q� - Moss),• V6q: • . l Souee PAUL CARSO Los Awl-i•mes Dee.or Ne.YpM1i.tm Mytl>W LnGs?+tl Prrtn WmeNWa faW.Sxu Ma Were J�N Fare[I W1Mn0 LA Times Page 1 of 5 SIT IN THE Gd l —l1Lta•: Home I Discussions I Print Edition I Archives I Site Map I Home Delivery I Advertise I Help News Business Sports hap:// .latimes.wmledibonslorangelt ays.topsWry.him Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping muac.mpyies.an. loos homes Back to StO.r�( N,reslaurants rare,allows Tuesday, March 7, 2000 A Clear Water Revival m In an effort to fight ocean pollution, officials are focusing on the problem at the sources of contamination—inland. By SEEMAMEHTA,Times Staff Writer With beach closures and high bacteria counts threatening Orange County's coastal appeal, local officials and activists are increasingly looking inland for solutions, taking a holistic approach to the problem of ocean pollution. Solutions range from rebuilding antiquated storm water systems to public education to creative planning. All target the myriad sources of contamination on land that have caused an increasing number of beach closures. "The ocean starts at your doorstep--regardless of where you live," said county Supervisor Tom Wilson. Waste, chemicals, fertilizer and other pollutants are carried from every home in Orange County and far beyond to stone drains, channels, creeks or rivers that empty into the Pacific Ocean. Five major waterways and several smaller ones that end in Orange County carry runoff from thousands of square miles and millions of people. A steady flow of urban runoff, sewage and other pollutants into such waterways is threatening the county's picturesque beaches and crystal waters. Heavy rainfall,such as Sunday's downpour, can flush pollutants and sediment downstream with such force that brown plumes reaching miles out to sea are created. Recent storms have elevated bacteria counts at the mouths of the Santa Ana and San Gabriel rivers and San Juan and San Diego creeks, according to the county health officials. Past solutions have revolved around what environmentalists call Band-Aid fixes, such as diverting storm-drain flows to sewer systems during the summer. While such temporary solutions have their place, activists and officials say the only true answer to save the coast is a fundamental societal shift--from persuading homeowners to stop over-watering their lawns to configuring new developments so that runoff is filtered and directed into ponds,rather than sent untreated into the ocean. "We're conditioned as a society to look for quick answers," said Christopher J. Evans, executive director of the Surfrider Foundation, based in San Clemente. hftp://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/pNnt.cgi 03/07/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 5 r But the solution to urban mnoff"isn't fast.It isn't easy.It's about changing our thinking about how we steward the ocean and the land,"he said. Multifaceted Approach Bacteria levels are already dangerously high where most waterways hit the beach,resulting in ocean water being off-limits for days,weeks or sometimes months at a time. Many creek mouths have total colifonn levels that exceed health standards as much as 95%of the time. To deal with this growing problem,officials are touting a multifaceted watershed management approach that includes increasing public education, changing how runoff is handled in built-out areas,improving development design concepts,enacting higher standards and strictly enforcing pollution laws. This movement comes at a pivotal time. In the coming decades,as the population booms and the dwindling undeveloped land is paved over,runoff is expected to become an increasing environmental,economic and health problem.The county's population is expected to grow from 2.8 million to 3.3 million by 2020,according to the Center for Demographic Research at Cal State Fullerton. All these people will be accompanied by housing,streets and other infrastructure.Natural soils and vegetation that now filter runoff,absorb it and slow its travel will be paved over. Concrete,asphalt and other hard surfaces act as a freeway for water to quickly reach the ocean. Along the way,every particle of copper shed by car brakes,every bit of animal waste left on sidewalks and every drop of pesticide sprayed in backyard gardens is picked up. Adding to this brew are the regular unauthorized discharges into the county's creeks.In 1999,a total of 276 spills sent 5.7 million gallons of raw or partially treated sewage into area waterways. By the time many creeks and rivers reach the ocean,they are a stew of sewage, heavy metals,poisons,animal waste and other pollutants. Activists such as William H.Roley Jr.,director of the Laguna Beach-based PermaCulture Institute of Southern California, say now is the time to ensure that past mistakes are not repeated. Development ought to be planned"as if nature mattered," he said. "It takes a conscious effort. We need to reduce impervious surfaces and invite nature back into our developments." Roley has taught at Cal Poly Pomona and at universities in Brazil.He is among the experts speaking at a series of county-sponsored workshops for local officials on ways to minimize runoff.A public workshop will be conducted in May,said Michael Wellborn,a county senior planner. Roley emphasizes that simple design changes,such as narrowing roads, shortening driveways,creating pocket parks and building males instead of gutters,can allow an area to naturally treat its urban runoff. Storm water needs to be viewed as an asset rather than a liability,he said. Instead of directing water away from developments as quickly as possible, it can be harnessed and reused. When water is recycled within a development,"you can produce a flower, a scent,a habitat area,an edible product, a salable product,a usable product," he said,citing a handful of exampled,including a housing development in Davis that uses storm water to irrigate an orchard. http://www,latimes.comlcgi-bin/pdnt.cgi 03/07/2000 LA Times Page 3 of 5 Some of Roley's examples are unique. One solution designed by architect Hundert Wasser that has been tried in Austria involves planting trees on every other floor of a multistory building. The trees,with branches emerging from windows,are fed by storm drain runoff from the roof. Eventually, activists envision nutrient-rich compost from the tenant's toilets on the floor above nourishing the trees. Local officials are skeptical that so radical a solution is practical here. However,they accept the underlying logic of dealing with runoff locally--rather than allowing it to flow unfettered to major bodies of water--as the key to ensuring future developments do not exacerbate pollution problems. Wetlands Planned State and county officials praised the Marblehead,Talega, Ladera Ranch and Newport Coast developments for including runoff control measures. At the 4,000-acre Ladera Ranch,developer Rancho Mission Viejo Co. put in two large wetlands--totaling about 18 acres--that will pond, detain and filter runoff, said Vice President Richard Broming. Additionally, a nearly 3-mile wetland"riverine"that leads runoff to one of the ponds runs through the community. This system will treat dry runoff and the first-flush storm flows from the 8,100-home development in South County,he said. Although officials are pleased by these voluntary efforts,regional water board members are considering stricter requirements for developers similar to measures in Los Angeles County. In January, the Los Angeles regional water board required large new developments to capture or treat runoff from the first three- quarters of an inch of rainfall. Wayne Baglin, chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, said his agency has scheduled a public workshop Wednesday in Temecula to consider a similar requirement. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,which has jurisdiction over the remainder of Orange County, is studying whether such limits are necessary in its region,said Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer. A larger problem is retrofitting existing development. "It takes a lot of money," Wellborn said. There are steps that cities and the county can take, such as installing catch basins in storm drains and increasing street sweeping. Prompted by last summer's two-month Huntington Beach shoreline closure,Orange County and five coastal cities that depend heavily on tourism dollars recently sought$1.2 million from various sources to pay for as many as 30 storm drain and pump station diversions from Huntington Beach to San Clemente. Elsewhere other concepts are being introduced. For example,on the East Coast, some parking lot operators have replaced medians with gravel and mulch filters. "One thing is not going to fix all these problems," Wellborn said. "We need to come up with a range of designs and see what is going to fit for what communities." Although costly,Berchtold said,retrofitting can head off enforcement actions and fines from regional water boards. In the past,public education was heralded as the cure for urban runoff. Although no longer seen as a magic bullet to eliminate coastal pollution, http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 03/07/2000 LA Times Page 4 of 5 publicity campaigns remain an important component. ♦ t + Washing Out to Sea Orange County's 13 watershet areas(indicated by colored areas)pour into five major waterways and many smaller ones that drain into the Pacific Ocean. Bacteria levels are often high where these waterways,fouled by urban runoff and sewage spills,empty int the ocean. San Gabriel River The 29-mile San Gabriel River flows from the San Gabriel Mountains to the Pacific Ocean between Long Beach and Seal Beach. The river drains about 635 square miles of Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino counties home to about 2.5 million people. The Santa Ana River: The San Ana River begins more than 100 miles away in the San Bernardino Mountains. It receives runoff from cities and dairies before it empties into the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. Its watershed includes more than 2,650 square miles in San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties and more than 4.5 million people. Source: Orange County Health Care Agency WASTE DISCHARGES These discharges are primarily spills of raw sewage and reclaimed water,but also include a wide variety of substances, including foam,grease and squid juice. 1999 WASTE DISCHARGE CAUSES: 14 Miscellaneous 14 Pump station failure 38 Pipeline break 210 Pipeline blockage BEACH CLOSURES: These numbers represent several multiple-day closures at beaches throughout Orange County. Number of O.C. beach closure days. 1999 BEACH CLOSURE CAUSES 1 Treatment plant 2 Pipeline breaks 3 Miscellaneous 5 Pump station failure 11 Pipeline blockage What's in the Water Polluted ocean water can contain pathogens—disease-causing bacteria,viruses and protozoa.Pathogens that may be found in ocean waters contaminated with sewage or runoff include: Pathogenic Agent: Disease http://www.latimes.conVegi-bin/pdnt.ogi 03/07/2000 LA Times Page 5 of 5 BACTERIA E. coli: Gastroenteritis Salmonella typhi: Typhoid fever Other salmonella species: Various enteric fevers(often called paratyphoid), gastmenteritis, septicemia(generalized infections--organisms,multiply in the bloodstream) Shigella dysenteriae and other species: Bacterial dysentery Vibrio cholera: Cholera * r • PROTOZOA (Intestinal Parasites) Cryptosporidium: Diarrhea-Cryptosporidiosis Giardia lamblia: Diarrhea- Giardiasis s + • VIRUSES Rotavirus: Diarrhea-Gastroenteritis Norwalkvirus: Gastroenteritis Coxsackievirus(some strains): Various,including severe respiratory disease, fevers,rashes,paralysis, aseptic meningitis myocarditis Adenovims: Respiratory and gastrointestinal infections Echovirus: Various,similar to coxsackievirus, (evidence is not definite except in experimental animals) Poliovirus:Poliomyelitis Hepatitis A: Infectious hepatitis(liver malfunction),also may affect kidneys and spleen Source: Orange County Health Care Agency � g hftp://www.latimes.com/ogi-bin/pdnt.cgi 03/07/2000 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 03/22/00 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on February 23, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/00 02/29/00 Totals $5,249,497.97 $8,616,540.73 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Receive and file complaint for injunctive relief and damages, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000000844, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 03/22/00 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 22, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 23, 2000 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re March 1, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 1, 2000 to be filed. C. Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the biosolids management contracts with Pima Gro, Bio Gro, Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations and contractor performance. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re March 2, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 2, 2000 to be filed. C. 1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$19,957, increasing the total contract amount to $211,561; 2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing the total contract amount to a total contract amount of$204,016; and; 3)Accept RA 6 W Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company. d. Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a Long-Term Sewer Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73.2. e. 1) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; 2) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5.50, for a total budget of$4,124,000; 3) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14r" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, for a total budget of$2,210,000; 4) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A"Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total budget of$2,248,000; 5)Approve a budget amendment of$12,061,000 for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for a total budget of$14,284,200; 03/22/00 Page 4 and 6) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos. 5-49. 5-50, 5-51, and 5-52 for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not to exceed $175,261. g. Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed $224.800. h. Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958. I. Direct staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, to replace the Foster Pump Station. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re March 8, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 8, 2000 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2D00. d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. e. Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland & Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999-00 for an amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years 2000-01 and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03 and 2003-04 upon Board approval. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re February 24, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 24, 2000 to be filed 03/22/00 Page 5 C. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, adding a public health element to the existing public information program for an additional amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $275,895, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the additional amount of$35,500. 16. 1) Approve the plans and specifications for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 4)Award a contract to JW Contracting Corporation for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to exceed $10,428,440. 17. Presentation on Consolidation of Revenue Area Financial Plans and Rates, except Revenue Areas 7 and 14 (information only). 18. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this ,agenda`asa regular meeting of the Board the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations; pending or potential litigation,or personnel'matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections' 54956.8. 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. 'Reports relating to (a)purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or ..potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee. '- representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed -session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board =takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Michael Rozengurt v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 808544, and Worker's Compensation Appeals Board Case No. AHM 0062970 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with General Counsel re Cross-Complaint, County of Kern v. County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, at al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. CV-PT-00-189564 (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 03/22/00 Page 6 19, Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 21. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 H:\wp a�genda\ mrd Agendas\2'pp Board AgendasMYt00.do Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 23, 2000 N Aairgrr by N EN`� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting 02/23/00 i Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on February 23, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan,Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Michael L. Maertzweiler James M. Ferryman X Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer Margie L. Rice X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Ed Torres; Jim Mullins; Mark Boyd; Catheirine Biele; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Phil Stone; David L. Hamilton; Terry Lane; Don Hughes; Dan Cassidy Minutes for Board Meeting 02/23/00 Page 3 t MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and attemate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Anencv Active Director Alternate Director Garden Grove Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater• Placentia Norman Z Eckenrode Michael L. Maertzweiler• REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Debay invited Director Jim Ferryman to attend the March Steering Committee meeting and Director Russ Patterson for the April Steering Committee meeting. It was also announced that Item 16 listed on the agenda would be considered immediately following the consent calendar. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there was a spill Monday afternoon in the Buena Park/La Mirada area when a sewer line surcharged. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, said that the Regional Board has been notified and a written report is due by Friday. It is estimated that about 10,000 gallons may have flowed into the storm drain, which ultimately emptied into the ocean via the San Gabriel River. The OC Health Care Agency has closed the beach in the area of the mouth of the river, citing a sewage spill. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported that due to a clerical error, Agenda Item 17(a)(2) should reference IUOE Local 501 rather than Orange County Employees Association. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held January 26, 2000, be deemed approved, as corrected. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/00 01/31/00 Totals $4,087,426.77 $8,798,129.00 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District extending the period of the Demonstration of Natural Gas Engines in Heavy Duty Trucks Project from 3/31/00 to 11/1/00 at no additional cost to the District. Minutes for Board Meeting 02/23/00 Page 4 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the February 23, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 26, 2000 to be filed. 12. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the February 3, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 3, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement, Job No.J-71-4, for a total amount not to exceed$485,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into agreements with chemical suppliers for chemicals and related services, for an amount not to exceed $183,000, to support demonstration testing of altemative technology for suede control in the tiunkline (Specification No. C-146). d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for professional engineering services, including a preliminary engineering report for a new Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66,for an amount not to exceed $375,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve a purchase order contract to Southern Contracling Company for Purchase of 48D-Volt Switchgear Equipment, Spermcation No. E-276,for a total amount of$304,213. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$51,000 for Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, for a total budget of $1,648,960; and (2)Accept Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with KPRS Construction Services,.Inc. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23,with Matthew and Stewart Company, Inc. authorizing an addition of$7,570, increasing the total contract amount to$137,366; (2) Ratify Change Order No.2 to Contract No. 11.23, authorizing a deduction of$19,012.80, for a revised total contract amount of$118,353.20; and (3)Accept Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No.11-23, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Matthew and Stewart Company, Inc. Minutes for Board Meeting 02/23/00 Page 5 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 9 to Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, and City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn Lane at Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, authorizing a deduction of$54,000 for Liquidated Damages, decreasing the total contract amount to $5,215,546, and adding 20 calendar days time extension for inclement weather, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 10 for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for an addition of $39,046.80, increasing the total contract amount to$5,254,592.80; and (3) Accept Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, and City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn Lane at Imperial HighwayAdaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc., authorizing an addition of$162,344, and 338 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,819,318; (2)Approve a budget amendment of$185,199 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of $4,444,886; and (3)Accept Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 240, with NCCI Enterprises, Inc., as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve a budget increase of $270,274 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,081,274; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of$20,274 and 339 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $716,832. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44.4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$218,540, and a time extension of 120 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $906,940. 13. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Mark Leyes, Vice Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the February 9, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 9, 2000 to be fled. Minutes for Board Meeting 02/23/00 Page 6 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 1999. 14. Item deleted. 15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for Grit Removal System, Job No. J-52; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specfications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommerdation; and (4)Award construction contract to Norman A. Olsson Construction Company for Grit Removal System, Job No. J-52, for an amount not to exceed $715,900. 16. David Hamilton, representative from IUOE Loral 501, addressed the Directors regarding the grievance filed by District employees Mark Boyd and Darlene Wilkerson. He clarified that Local 501 is representing the employees in this grievance. Mark Boyd also addressed the Board regarding the issues that prompted the filing of the grievance. His concern was management demanding training on pay-for-performance issues while their group was conducting meet and confer sessions. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Affirm the decision of the General Manager at Step 4 of the grievance procedure by finding no violation of the existing Memorandum of Understanding provisions, and ordering no further action. Management was directed to increase sensitivity to training issues while employees are in the meet and confer process. Director Don Bankhead opposed. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9 and 54957.6: The Board convened in closed session at 8:09 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1) and (2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:31 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m. Secretary of Board of D))' tors of Orange Coun anitation bi trict H\wp.0a�gendaUBoard Min,Aea 2000 Board Ml omN022300Aoo Claims Paid From 1/1100 to Ill 6100 m Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descriptlon Accounts Payable-Wit enb 24W Cerullo Engineers & 51,141.02 Engineering Services-P2-BO&J-34-1 24546 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 21.100.0 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K 24547 Ccmpusdzed Facility Integration 178,911.64 Engineering Service J-25-1 24648 E.I.Cu Pont De Nemoum and Company 43,681.00 Painting Malnt.Services MO 4-22-98 24549 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 26.415.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 24550 Projects Partners 43.605.47 Temporary Employment Services 24551 ScuNem California Edson 34,686.43 Power 24552 Tran Consulting Engineers 38238.00 Consulting Services 5416 2450 Tide Ranct/Mogan Fanca 63,240.25 Residues Removal MO 3.29.95 245M Bernard Carlstnldlpn Company,Inc. 501 Construction 3.35R&111R 24555 Flemin9 Engineering,Inc. 351,425.08 Construction 3.38-1 24556 Mathew And Shrived Co.,Inc. 56,660.41 Construction 11-23 24557 Svenirup CMl.Inc. 41.719.00 Construction 7-7-1 24558 Union Bank of Celpomla 39,047.23 Construction 3-38-1 24569 Union Bank of CalKomis 58.533.80 Cambecion 3.35 245W ABEL Pumps Carp 208.75 Freight 24MI Great American Printing Co. 901.35 Office Supplies 24502 Airborne Express 9.50 Air Freight 24583 Ails-Robbins,Inc. 152.6a Instrument Supplies 24564 Alemativa Dispute Resolution Cadge Group 411,01 Human Resources Service 24585 American Management Association International 1,425.00 Registration 245W Pollan Industries 3,30523 Instrument Supplies 2407 American Training Resources,Inc. 633.30 Training Materiels 24668 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 24569 Applauds Employment Service 2,426.06 Temporary Employment Services 'b 24570 Applied Industrial Technology 1,394.52 Electrical Pads&Supplies 24571 Aquatic Testing Labaratorss 6,400.00 Toxldly Testing 24572 Aerates&Trophies By Sea 30.17 Plaques 24573 A;u r Environmental 426.93 Lab Supplies 24574 APEX Communications 3,900.00 Securtty Equipment 24575 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 22.98 Telephone Service 24576 AT&T Wireless Service 1.50 Cellular Telephone Service 245T7 AWSI 219.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 24578 Battery Specialist, 808.13 Batiedes 24579 Breeaer Construction 1,127.69 Pump Supplies 24580 Brunei Systems.Inc. 18,560.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 24561 Brown&Caldwell 8.274.00 Engineering Serum J-36.1 24582 CaI-Glass,Inc 677.11 Lab Equipment SaMce 24583 Cold Centrifugal Pump 3,926.31 Pump Service&Supplies 24684 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 1,980.00 Engineering Service-Mapping 24585 Chose Menhatian Bank of Texas.N.A. 10.248.50 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 24588 Coast Fire Equipment 229.51 Fire Extinguisher 24687 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 214.67 Lab Supplies 24588 Connell GM Pads 148.61 Truck Supplies 24589 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc 86.57 Electrical Supplies 24590 Cooper Energy Servlcas 11,297.82 Engine Supplies 24501 Copeke Capital.Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 24592 Oars Laboratories.Inc. 1,000.00 Lab Testing 24593 Corporate Express 331.20 Office Supplies 245% County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,425A3 Electrical Supplies 24595 Crane America Services.Inc. 19,613.51 Ors"SeMcas Page 1 of 5 Claire Paid Prom 1/1100 to 1115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 24590 Cytec Industries 12.072.15 Antonia Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 24W7 California Municipal Treasures Assoc.(CMTA) 225.00 Seminar Registration 24598 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 192.55 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers 24599 David's Tree Service 475.00 Tree Malnt.Service 24600 Del Mar Analytical 2,560.00 Blosolids Analysis 24601 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 14.585.04 4 Notebook Computers 241102 DeZudk C/O Misco/SOWIWest 5,404.74 Valves 24603 Dun&Bradstreet Business Education Services 195.00 Training Registration 24604 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 32.61 Paint Supplies 24605 DDS Engineering,Inc 11.842.00 Tammany Employment Services 24005 Enchanter,Inc. 1,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-0 24607 Emimnmenlal Express 956.62 Lab Supplies 24608 FedEx Corporation 56.03 Alr Freight 24809 Filter Supply Company 2,732.00 Fibers 24610 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,784.28 Lab Supplies 24611 Fry's Electronics 152.96 Computer Supplies 24612 Full Spectrum Matinee.Inc 420.00 Lab Instrument Service 24613 General Electric Supply Company 1,074AS Electric Parts 24614 GTE California 706.58 Telephone Services 24615 Gledlch-M6chell,Inc. 15.720.15 Bell,Filter Press Supplies 24616 IAW Grainger,Inc 2.917.40 Compressor Supplies 24817 Graphic Design Book Club 31.90 Seeks 24618 Groseby S.T.J. 1,888.94 Engine Supplies 24819 Great Weatem Sanitary Supplies 214.80 Janitorial Supplies M 24620 GS Edwards,Div.of GS Bldg.Systems Corp. 4.250.00 Safety Service Alinement 24621 Harold Pdmroae Ice 48.110 Its For Samples ly 24622 HIM.Inc. 311.45 Toole N 24623 Home Depot 351.37 Smell Hardware 24824 Hub Ado Supply 44.59 Truck Pads 246M City of Huntington Beech 11,984.77 Water Use 24626 Indusdal Air Cernmesser 2.801.50 Equipment Rental 24627 Industrial Threaded!Products,Inc. 2.666.00 Machanlcel Peda It Supplies 24628 StetaNet 200.00 Online Service 24829 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 90.92 Lab Supplies 24630 Integrated Sign Assoc. 7,212.04 CNG Station Signs 24631 Intelllsye Group,Inc 3.771.26 Computer Supplles 2032 Interstate Battery Systems mega Batteries 24633 IMrre Photo Graphics 19.02 Photographic Sandiest 24634 Algae Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 525.81 Safety Supplies 24635 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc 9.887.25 Misc.Construction Services-"C"Headworks Gate 24636 Jaya Catering 1,528.85 Caledng Services 24637 Johnstone Supply 319.23 Electrical Supplies 24635 Industrial Distribution Group 759.42 Tools 24639 Lab Supped 930.00 Temporary Employment Services 24640 Labwere,Inc. 1.000.00 Lab Information Management System Software NO 2-26.97 24641 LaserAll Corporation 1,571.88 Printer Service Agreement 24642 Lee&Ro,Inc 12.559.91 Engineering Consulting Services-P2 39&P247A 24643 Leols-Nerds 21.17 Books&Publications 24644 The Light House 99.30 Electrical Supplies 24645 MasTea Network Services 17,163.10 Communication Equipment Upgrade 24M MCMasto'Cam Supply Ca. 359.67 Tools 24547 Mee Anayllwl System 4.508.00 Professional SeMas-Toxicity Tasting Page 2 of 6 Claims Paid From 111100 to 1I15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 24648 Me0a Muffler 578.25 Truck Supplies 24649 Minarlk 1,540.47 Instrument Supplies 24650 Mission Uniform SeMce 3,276.27 Uniform Rentals 24651 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,428.00 Instruments 24652 National Mlcrocomp Services 2,045.00 SeMce Agreement-Plant Automation 24653 National Plant SeMces,Inc. 12,937.50 Vacuum Truck SeMces 24654 Neal Supply Co. 229.64 Plumbing Supplies 24655 Many Petroleum Co.,Inc. 23,025.9E LubrlcanVP'esol Fuel 24656 The Noom Companies 140.00 Moil Datha ry SeMce 24857 Office Depot Business Services Di, 2,028.35 Office Supplies 24655 OhmaruVEGA Corp. 980.00 Registration 24659 On-Una ENdmnlcs,Inc. 172.96 Electrical Supplies 24660 Oxygen SeMce Company 892.74 Specialty Oases 24681 OCS Reprographics 87.27 Pdnlln9 SeMce-Spec P-173 24662 OCE-USA,Inc. 401.74 Computer Equipment Maint. 24W3 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 427.59 Electrical Supplies 24BU Pacific Bell 17.13 Telephone SeMces 24855 Perin Unlimited 324.39 Truck Supplies 24855 Pierce Chemical 591.54 Lab Supplies 24667 Power Systems Testing Company 6.408.00 Generator Set Repair 24688 Primary Source 1,852.17 Office Furniture 24669 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 4,05.0I Temporary Employment SeMces 24570 DOS,L.L.C. 258.82 Innstment Management Program SeMce 24671 Rockhunl College Comenuing Education ' 308.00 Registration rt 24672 RPM Electric Motors 2.039.89 Electric Motor Repair 24673 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 2,683.27 Palm Supplies ly 24674 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1.225.66 Soil Materiels w 2075 Salety40een 124.00 SeMce Agreement 24676 Seem Industrial Selea 494.08 Mechanical Supplies 24877 SecmdSun 232.22 Light Fixluros 24075 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 290.16 Toole 24879 Slew Instruments 2.392.50 Lab Supplies 24680 Skalar,Inc. 13.62 Lab Supplies 24081 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Cs. 5.081.93 COP Trustee SeMces 24682 Steven Enterprises.Inc. 303.47 Office Supplies 24683 Summit Steal 284.52 Metal 245M Suncor Stainless,Inc. 68.01 Lab Supplies 24685 Sunset Ford 25.28 Truck Supplies 24688 Sunset IndusWal Pans 508.82 Mechanical Supplies 24687 SHRM 2000 1,620.00 Registration 24898 The Merdwood Corporation 3,553.00 Professional SeMces-Blosolids Land Inspection 24669 Thompson Indust0al Supply,Inc. 157.84 Mechanical Supplies 24690 Thyssen Darer Elevator Corporation 127.50 Senior Maintenance 24691 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 24692 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 428.41 Tuck Supplies 24693 Truesdell Labomtodes.Inc. 80.00 Lab Barvkes 24694 Teksystems 2.202.50 Temporary Employment SeMces 24685 TRW EMC/Coubmth.Sernxts 600.00 Equipment Car88ca9on 24696 U.S.FIiter Corporation 2.525.50 SeMce Agreement 24597 UIUa Bcientiec 484.93 Lab Supplies 24698 United Parcel Sartre 19.51 Parcel SeMces Page 3 of 5 Claims Paid From 111100 to IMSM0 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Dencripton 24698 United Pumping Service 1,531.25 Pumping Service 2470D Underground Conviction Technology(UCT) 375.0D Registration 24701 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,0D8.90 Plumblrg Supplies 24702 Valley Detroit Diesel AlHeon 1,700.00 GeneratorRepeir 24703 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 16.168.00 Consulting Services-Capital Facility Capacity Charge Program 247N Village Nurseries 24.22 Landscaping Supplies 24705 VWR Scknllflc Products Corporation 10.590.62 Lab Supplies 247M The Wackenhut Coryoralion 5,906.72 Security Guards 24707 Water Environment Federation 54]5 Publication 24708 Xerox Corporation 6,700.64 Copier Leases 2470E Thomas M.Flanagan 158.23 MeelinglTmining Expema Reimb. 24710 David A.Ludwln 494.99 Meeting7Treiidng Expense Reimb. 24711 Robed J.Taylor 132.49 Mestin97Tralning Expanse Reimb. 24712 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 630.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 24713 Orange County Sanitation Dlstrkt 910.97 Pe0y Cash Reimb. 24714 AdanuuMallory Construc0on Co.,Inc. 25,430.31 ConaWtllon-Sulfur Monitoring Equip.Insranation 24715 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42,911.37 20 Computers&2 Computer Wodksta6om 24716 Orange County Sanitation District 471,469.58 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 24717 American Alrems 3.658.50 Trawl Services 24718 American Express 12,693.40 Purchasing Card Program 24719 Aurora Dale Systems 1.795.00 Software Melnt.Agreement 24720 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.06 Telephone Service 24721 AT&T Wellman Service 4,324.01 Cellular Telephone Service 24M Court Order 479.00 Wage Gamishmeld 24723 Be["Radiator Service 134.6D Truck Repairs 3v 24724 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment1 24725 California Water Awareness Campaign 2000 300.00 Membership 24728 Clayton Group SeMoes,Inc. 10,109.62 Professional Services-P1444 24727 Court Older 681.00 Wage Garnishment 24728 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 269.38 Electrical Supplies 2472D CASA M.60 Conference Registration 24M CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership 24731 D.R.M atly&Associates 4,641.W Registration-Software Thinning 24732 Court Older 811.07 Wage Garnishment 24733 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 24734 Franchise Tax Scarf SZ32 Wage Garnishment 24735 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 24736 GTE Cenfomla 1.370.34 Telephone Stevens 24737 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 87.55 Catering Services 24738 Haw Magazine 64.96 Subscription 24739 Hunts'Final Phase 22,875.00 Mani.Conviction Services-Admin.Bldg.Acoustic Modlfn. 24740 Immlgra0on&Naturalization Service 610.00 Filing Fees 24741 Information Resources 580.00 Human Resources Service 24742 Inn Union of Oper End AFL-CIO Loral 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 24743 Algae Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 338.78 Safely Supplies 247" Jay's Catering 968.53 Catering Services 24745 Keep Appraisal Service 108A0 Appraisal Service 24746 Lucds 160.75 Meeting Expense 24747 MCR Technologies,Inc. 814.58 Instrument Supplies 24748 Nat West Mariners 750.00 COP Lefler of Credit Fees 24748 Naflomd Technology Transfer,Inc. 2,95100 Training Registration 24750 Orange County Business Council 5W.00 Registration Pepe 4 of 5 � u. 4 Claims Paid From 111100 to 1/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount _Description 24751 Orange County Family Support 495.80 Wage Garnishment 24752 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage GamlahmeM 24763 Oda Fire Protection 370.00 Swim Agreement 24754 OCB Reprographics 21.01 Pdngng Service-Spec P-173 24755 OCEA 621.43 Dues Deduction 24788 Pacific Publishers 101.22 Publication 24767 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 24756 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 24759 Pea.Om.rs Cowell of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction 2478D Pryor Resources,Inc. 59.00 Training Registration 24761 Pulsefesder,Inc. 68513 Pump Supplies 24762 Roudedge 122.95 Publiaion 24763 S.ti Specialty Gans,Inc. 1,154.84 Specialty Gases 24764 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 29.05 Tools 24705 So.Cal.Gas Company 6,892.37 Natural Gas 24788 So6Vlek Computer Products 1,348.54 Computer Supplies 24767 Southern California Edison 8,230.59 Porker 24768 Southern California Water 64.46 Water U. 24769 Slate of California 148.04 Wage Garnishment 24770 SARBS-PDC 500.00 Training Registration 24771 United Steles Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage 24772 Board of Regems 775.00 Seminar Registration 24773 WEF Membership 130.00 Membership 24774 Zymark Corporation 2,180.00 Lab Supplies 24775 ZD Journals 89.00 Publlcetion 24778 Philip F.Cordova 65.63 Mnting?reining Expense Relmb. 7 24777 Thomas M.Flanagan 1,432.42 Meating/Trslning Expense Relmb. N 24775 L.Kevin Handed 1,900.00 Mesting/rraInlllg Expense Relmb. 24779 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 435.00 Semr Swim Fees Admin. 24780 Janlos Debay 650.00 Meeting/rralning Expense Relmt. 24781 Norman Eckenrode 2D0.00 Meoting/Tralning Expense Relmb. 24782 Peter M.Green 650.00 MeetigRralntng Expense Relmb. 24783 James W.Silva 650.00 Meetlntin alning Expense Relmb. Total Accounts Payable-Mmmes $ 2,014,332.09 Pavroll Dlsbureemants 17609-17813 Employee Paychecks $ 21.698.19 Torminallon 17614.17761 Employee Paychecks 293,608.04 Bhvnkly Payroll 1/12ro0 17762-17763 Employee Paychecks 375.90 Adjustments 45251-458M Direct Deposit Statements 821,217.33 Bireekly Payroll i/12J00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 936,899.55 Wtm Transfer Pavmonle Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,164,07 December Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Pamclpatlon Chase Bank of Texas National Association 207.451.26 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Sodas A Certificate of Participation Slate Street Bank S Trust Co.of Ca. 179,589.80 December Internal Payment on 1980-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Tetsl Wire Transfer Payments It 536.195.13 Total Claims Paid 111100-1116100 E 4,0117A 77 Page 5 of 5 Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 247M Barclays Bank PLC $ 90,667.39 COP Lefler of Credit 24785 RPI/Bio Gro 371,131.75 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 24786 Blue Crass of California 172,318.81 Medical Insurance Premium 24787 Carollo Engineers 65.937.19 Engineering Services-J-254&J-39 24788 Delta Dental 41,701.89 Dental Insurance Plan 24789 DukeSolutions,Inc. 100,057.29 Natural Gas-Spec&170 24790 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 49,842.44 Misc.Construction Services-Demolition&Replacement of Clarifier Feed Well 24791 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium 24792 Kemlmn Pacific.Inc. 234,052.39 Ferric Chloride MO 947-95 24793 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 129,899.96 Engineering Services J42 24794 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 37,694.28 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 24795 Polydyne,Inc. 65,117.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 24796 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72.318.15 Ocean Monitoring MO 641A4 24797 Southern California Edison 52,167.76 Power 24798 SPEC Services.Ina 103,650.32 Engineering Services J-33-1 24799 Tule Ranch/Magan Fame 50.032.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 24800 Villa Ford 33,564.10 (2)2000 Ford Ranger PN 24801 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 75.126.45 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 24802 Western States Chemical,Inc. 39,635.53 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 24803 Woodruff,Spmdlin&Smart 108,774.55 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 24804 Advance Constructors,Ina. 31,490.00 Construction 541-1 24805 Margate Construction,Ina 395,148.00 Construction P2-39 rt 24WS NCCI Enterprises,Ina 31,537.35 Engineering Services 240 m 24807 S.S.Mechanical Corp 277,438.07 Construction P146-2&J-63 i. 24808 Southern Contracting Company 188,194.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1 24609 A-Plus Systems 120.00 Notion&Ads 24810 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 1,905.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 24811 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 Lab Supplies 24812 Airborne Express 64.75 Air Freight 24813 Aladdin House 393.97 Window Blinds 24814 Porten Industries 6,707.18 Lab Supplies 24816 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 360.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 24816 Appleons Employment Service 3,919.81 Temporary Employment Services 24817 Applied Industrial Technology 697.02 Electrical Parts&Supplies 24818 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 7,950.00 Toxicity Testing 24819 Arcus Data Security 106.80 O6ske Back-Up Tape Storage 24620 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services 24821 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 1,515.08 Waste Removal 24822 The Oulkset OrganlzationlAssoa Concrete 299.98 Concrete 24823 ASS Automation,Inc. 356.92 Instrument Service Maim. 24824 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 1.002.46 Ceiling Tile 24825 APEX Communications 12.48820 Security Equipment 24826 ASRAnalysls 320.00 Vibration Analysis 7.7.1 24827 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 119.04 Telephone Service 24828 AWSI 63.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 24829 Battery Speclall 125.20 Batteries 24830 Brenner Construction 1.774.38 Pump Supplies Page 1 of 8 e _ u ry Claims Paid From 1/16100 to 1131100 Warrant No. Vandor Amount Descripdon 24831 Bristol Systems,Inc. 18.960.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 24832 BNI Building News IW.94 Publication 24833 California Automatic Gale 2,116.68 Service Agreement 24834 California Relcation Services,Inc. 412.50 Office Moving Services 24835 Caltrol,Inc. 2,292.87 Eledrial Parts&Supplies 24836 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 24837 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 8,635.00 Engineering Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension 24838 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,401.56 Instrument Pads 24838 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 1,364.55 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 24840 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 4.580.16 Computer Marl.Agreement 24841 Consolidated Elect,Distributors,Inc. 6,886.65 Electrical Supplies 24942 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 351.29 Plumbing Supplies 24843 Continental Laboratory Products,Inc. 3,230.04 Lab Supplies 24844 Controfoo 564.87 Electrical Supplies 24845 Converse Consultant. 1,277.00 Consulting Services-P2-60 U846 Cooper Energy Services 674.04 Engine Supplies 24847 Corporate Express Imaging 6,892.77 Misc.Computer Supplies 24848 Corporate Express 1.353.51 Office Supplies 24849 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 24,220.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 t+] 24811 Cost Containment Solutions 700.78 Workees Comp.Services % 24851 Cotelli9enl 4,304.75 Training Registration 24852 County of Orange-Auditor Controller , 245.00 Communicatlon Service Agreement N. 24853 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,353.47 Electrical Supplies rt 24SU Crane America Services,Inc. 913.33 Crane Services 24855 Crane Valve Group 72.50 Publication 24856 Creative Business Concepts 1.072.75 Professional Service-Computer 24867 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 24858 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 6,385.21 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers 24859 CR&R,Inc. 1,8g0.00 Container Rentala 24860 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 5,960.00 Lab Analysis 24861 De Guells&Sons Glass Co. 90.10 Safety Glass 24862 Del Mar Analytical 019.20 Siosollds Analysis 24883 Del Direct Sales L.P. 8.406.66 6 H.P.Printers 24864 De2urlk C/O Mlsco/SouthWest 6.530.23 Values 24865 Diamond H Recognition 815.94 Employee Service Awards 248M Digdec Corp 363.60 Printer Maint. 24867 Dunn-Edward.Corporation 29.63 Paint Supplies 24868 DDB Engineering,Inc. 4,455.00 Temporary Employment Services 24869 DGA Consultants,Inc. 13,140.00 Surveying Services MO 64194 24870 Enchanter,Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 24871 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 6.651.66 Consulting Services-FIS Support 24872 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 2,095.60 Lab Supplies 24873 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,129.96 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 24874 EXFO-Electra Optical Engineering,Inc 42D.00 Electrical Supplies 24875 Faxpresa,Inc. 735.94 Office Supplies 24876 FedEx Corporation 133.59 Air Freight 24877 Filter Supply Company 267.20 Fillers 24878 First Amedun Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 1116MO to 1131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 24579 First Metro Appraisals 5,5110.00 Sakloka Easement Appraisal 24880 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,197.52 Lab Supplies 24881 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 160.00 Concrete Cutting 24882 Flo-Systems,Inc. 407.30 Pump Supplies 24883 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 5,010.00 Standby Generators Rental 24884 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,906.94 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 24885 Fountain Valley Camem IGM92 Photo Supplies 24886 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 459.11 Track Wash Tickets 24887 Fountain Valley Palms.Inc. 246.01 Paint Supplies 24888 Franklin Covey Co. 199.00 Training Registration 24889 Fry's Electronics 140.05 Computer Supplies 24890 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.717.32 Lumber/Hardware 24891 GTE California 2.334.91 Telephone Services 24892 George Yardley Co. 645.72 Lab Supplies 24893 Gieriich-Mitchell,Inc. 7,58754 Beft,Filter Press Supplies 24894 Global Engineering Documents 103.33 Publication 24895 Goldensest Window Service 1,844.00 Window Cleaning Service 24896 VAN Grainger,Inc. 1,404.05 Compressor Supplies 24897 Graphic Controls 668.05 Office Supplies 24898 Graphic Distributors 469.36 Photographic Supplies 24899 Graseby S.T.I. 4,301.94 Engine Supplies r 24900 Hach Company 2,068.44 Lab Supplies Q 24901 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples r rt 24902 Herrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 12.14 Plumbing Supplies m 24903 Hems Woodcraft Bakery&Dell 58.00 Catering Services w 249N The Holman Group 704.32 Employee Assistance Program Promium 24905 Holmes&Narvor,Inc. 1,192.77 Engineering Services P7<4-4 24906 Home Depot 1,262.86 Small Hardware 24907 Idou 22,784.33 Lab Supplies 24908 Imaging Plus,Inc. 262.67 Printing Service 24909 Irvine Photo Graphics 662.02 Photographic Services 24910 Irvine Ranch Water District 32.54 Water Use 24911 ISCO CIO MRC Technology 3,879.00 Lab Supplies 24912 IBM Corp. 6.075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 24913 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 24914 IECOC 22.00 Registration 24915 Align Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 274.95 Safety Supplies 24916 J&8 Auto Parts 127.74 Auto Pads&Supplies 24917 J&W Scientific 751.34 Lab Supplies 24918 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc 633.96 Instrument Supplies 24919 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 21,727.12 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Sodas 24920 Jay's Catering 500.33 Catering Services 24921 Jobs Available,Inc. 147.20 Notices&Ads 24922 Jomrak 95.00 Notices&Ads 24923 Johnstone Supply 209.15 Electrical Supplies 24924 K S.Dunbar B Associates 11,250.00 Engineering Services 241 24925 Karen Monaco&Associates 2,000.00 Dale Integration Pmject Services 24925 Kelly Paper 504.92 Paper Page 3 of 8 b Claims Paid From 1110M to 1131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 24927 Industrial Distribution Group 5.964.00 Toob 24928 League of CA Cities all Registration 24929 Gerald R.Jones 9,087.13 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 24930 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. 1,120.00 Architectural Services 24931 Mantek 319.45 Pest Control Supplies 24932 MarVac Electronics 315.50 Instrument Supplies 24933 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 241,10 Tools 24934 Mec Analytical System 2.225.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 24935 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 855.00 Pumping Equipment Repair 24936 Mission Uniform Service 4.813.89 Uniform Rentals 24937 Mitchell Instrument Co. 39.00 Instruments 24938 Morton Salt 562,29 Sall 24939 Motion Industries 369.40 Pump Supplies 24940 MoloPholo 493.56 Photographic Services 24941 Management Action Programs,Inc. 2,200.00 Registration 24942 Nasco 345.7E Instrument Supplies 24943 National Microcemp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 24944 Nicholas Natty 460.00 Legal Fees 24945 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc, 10,W8.44 Lub icantlDiesel Fuel 24946 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 5,609.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 24947 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,945.48 Office Supplies 24948 The Ohmad CorpomtionNEGA Corp. 1,738.00 Training Registration r• 24949 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 2,33761 Electrical Parts&Supplies 'Y 24950 Oracle Corp 3.677.86 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 24951 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 434.31 Plumbing Supplies 24952 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1.151.97 Fillings 24953 Ort¢Fire Protection 2AN-00 Service Agreement 24954 Oxygen Service Company 2,625.07 Specialty Gases 24955 OC6 Reprographics 3.378.23 Printing Service-Spec P-173 24956 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 421.02 Electrical Supplies 24957 Pacific Bell 50.46 Telephone Services 24968 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 24959 Pacific lnlustdal Supply 8920 Furniture 249W Pacific Mechanical Supply 5,513.67 Plumbing Supplies 24961 Pagenet 1,891-69 Paging Services 24962 Panemetacs 375.96 Instrument Supplies 24963 Parker Hannifin Coryoration 43.16 Mechanical Supplies 24964 Patriot Video Productions 1,028.96 Video Taping Services 24965 Percival Scientific 3,052.00 Lab Supplies 24966 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 320.95 Fillers 24967 Pod Supply 11.16 Rope 24968 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 491.07 EleMcal Supplies 24969 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental 24970 Cambridge integrated Service 2.083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 24971 Primary Source 11.393,42 Office Furniture 24972 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 4.506.04 Temporary Employment Services 24973 Professional Publications,Inc. 147.45 Publication 24974 Projects Partners 17,80285 Temporary Employment Services Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 24975 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1.714.50 Mechanical Supplies 24976 PCS Express 292.40 Courier Service 24977 PIHRA 300.00 Notices&Ads 24978 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 2,W8.82 Instrument Supplies 24978 Rain for Rent 2,798.15 Pump Rental 249M Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2.370.44 Trash Removal 24981 Red Wing Shoes 122.40 Relmburseble Safety Shoes 24982 Reliastar 22,068.53 Employee Medical Health Premium 24983 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,447.14 Life Insurance Premium 24954 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 1,012.86 Pump 24985 RPM Electric Motors 178.10 Electric Motor Repair 24986 Safety-Kleen 11,252.71 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 24987 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 2,301.46 Specialty Gases 24988 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc 355.00 Lab Repairs 24989 Seavlaual Consulting,Inc. 6.468.66 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 2499D SecondSun 149.19 Light Fbdums 24991 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 339AS Tools 24992 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,225.27 Tools/Hardware 24993 Stamens Building Technologies,Inc. 6.085.00 Air Conditioner Automation System 24994 Slavers Instruments 2.409.30 Lab Supplies 24995 Skala,, Inc. 880.22 Lab Supplies 24996 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 311.15 Plumbing Supplies F„ 24997 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,961.49 Natural Gas tt 24998 S000-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Supplies 24989 SoftCholce 1.498.81 Software th 25000 South Coast Air Duality Management Dist. 1,967.60 Emission Fees 25001 Sparkletts 2,177.51 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 25002 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 122.75 Pump Supplies 25003 State Board of Equalization 962.41 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 25004 Strata International,Inc 926.98 Chemicals 26OD5 Suceasaorles,Inc. 975.06 Pictures for New Plant 2 Maint.Bldg. 260M Summit Steel 1.000.17 Metal 25007 Sun-Bell Landscape&Maintenance 1,300.D0 Landscape Maint. 250DB Sunset industrial Pads 5,080.46 Mechanical Supplies 250D9 Super Chem Corporation 969.75 Chemicals 25010 SKC-West,Inc. 859.74 Safely Supplies 2501/ Taylor-Dunn 12,603.70 Electric Cad Pane 25012 Thermo Optak Corporation 1,850.00 Lab Equlpmerd Software Agreement 25013 Finnigan-A ThermoDuest Subsidiary 2,090.35 Lab Supplies 25014 Thomas M.Dowes 3,145.00 Professional Services MO 4-23.97 25015 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 177.60 Mechanical Supplies 25D76 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 504.31 Locks&Keys 25017 Total Air Analysis,Inc. 400.00 Lab Testing Service 25018 Than Consulting Engineers 21,550.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 25019 TNesdall Laboratories,Inc 80.00 Lab Services 25020 Teksyslems 4,912.50 Temporary Employment Services 25021 U.S.Filler Corporation 1,202.75 Service Agreement 25022 United Parcel Service 741.87 Pmcel Services Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 1116100 to 1131100 Wemnt No. Vendor Amount Description 25023 Unocal Corporation 31 AS Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 348.3 25024 V&A Consulting Engineers 14,36&72 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 25025 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,975.00 Consulting Services-Web Programming 26028 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,342.90 Vision Service Premium 25027 VWR Scientific Products Corporation %954.79 Lab Supplies 25028 The Wackenhut Corporation 14,099.68 Security Guams 26029 Wears Corporation 405.00 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment 25030 Weds Sanitary Supply 146.14 Janitorial Supplies 25031 Western Highway Products,Inc 244.99 Pavement Marker Supplies 25032 WEF Membership 96.00 Membership 25033 Xerox Corporation 5,232.80 Copier Lasses 25034 Ark Construction Company 7.058.88 Construction P7444 25035 Dionne Kemos 1,747.23 Employee Computer Loan Program 25036 Orange County Bankston District 24.029.12 Workers Comp.Relmb. 25037 Orange County Sanitation District 160.27 Petty Cash Reimb. 25038 Robert Scot Polk&Dell Computer Corp. 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 25039 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 31,T71.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25M Orange County Sanitation District 509,511.63 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 26041 Sunset Beach San6ary District 55,000.00 Construction-J-73 CooperatNe Projects Program 25042 Air Industries 3,049.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25043 Aluminum Forge 669.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 26W Aluminum Precision 447.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25045 American Banker Newsletters 1,239.13 Publication rt 25046 Anaheim Memorial Medical Center 7.103.09 Reconciliatlon User Fee Refund 25047 ASCE,Orange County Branch 50.00 Registration on on 25048 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 380.99 Telephone Service 25049 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 104.46 Telephone Service 25050 Ball Pipe&Supply Co. 76.14 Valve Supplies 25051 Court Omer 564.00 Wage Garnishment 26052 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 25053 BdndlwThomas Oil Company 287.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25054 Case Swayne,Inc. 3,473.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25055 Chapman House,Inc. 3.450.00 Training Registration 25056 Circuit Connection 946.94 Reconcillatlon User Fee Refund 26057 City of Fountain Valley 16.896.03 Water Use 25M Court Omer 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25059 Consolidated Elea.Distributors,Inc. 471.23 Electrical Supplies 25060 Cot0ligent 7,500.00 Training Registration 25061 Dawson Company 2,489.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25052 DeIndRigid-Flex,Inc. 234.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25063 Dunham Metal Processing 102.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25064 Dye Technique 1,163.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25065 Court Omer 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25066 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment 26067 GTE California 4,407.44 Telephone Somicas 25068 George Jones 124.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25069 Goodwin Company 5.520.97 Reconciliatlon User Fee Refund 25070 City of Huntington Beach 11,961.33 Water Use Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 1/16100 to 1I31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25071 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 62.32 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 25072 Inlemem 1,454.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25073 Intl Unlon of Oper Eng AFL-C10 Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 25074 Irvine Ranch Water District 24.22 Water Use 25075 Ken Compenies/ExemProv,Inc. 375.00 Training Expense 25076 Lem-Plate Tech 173.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25077 Lexls Publishing 799.50 Publication 25078 Lustre-Cal 517.01 Labels 25079 Martin Luther Hospital 1.392.96 Remndliallon User Fee Refund 25090 MarVac Electronics 198.65 Instrument Supplies 25081 Mask Technology,Inc. 1,278.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25082 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA,Inc. 182.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25083 Moravek Blachemlcals,Inc. 297.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 26084 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 695.00 Training Registration 25085 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 179.10 Electrical Pane 6 Supplies 25086 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 157.52 Plumbing Supplies 25087 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25088 Orange County Forum 350.00 Registration 25089 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25090 OCEA 614.78 Dues Deduction 25091 Pacific Ball 1.074.85 Telephone Services 25092 Pacific Quartz,Inc. 1,683.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25093 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25094 Court Order 295.00 Wage Garnishment 25095 Peace Officals Council of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction 250M California Flneblanking Corp. 195.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25097 Premn,Inc. 136.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25098 Prudential Overall Supply 3,680.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25099 PCA Metal Finishing 4,534.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25100 Quality Soldering,Inc. 34.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25101 OLP Laminates,A Divison of AMP,Inc. 11.741.10 Reconcillation User Fee Refund 25102 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 455.48 Paint Supplies 26103 Sheraton Newport Beach 2,000.00 Meeting Expanse -Huntington Beach Issue 25104 Shureluck Sales B Engineering 93.52 Tools/Herdwere 25105 So.Cal.Gas Company 46.92 Natural Gas 26105 Solder Station One Inc-West 136.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund - 25107 South Coast Circuits,Inc. 639.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25108 South Coast Oil Corp 211.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25109 South Coast Water 873.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25110 Southern California Academy of Sciences 1,200.00 Publications 25111 Slate of California 170.29 Wage Garnishment 25112 Stalek Corporation 672.00 Remndllation User Fee Refund 26113 Steelcass 580.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 26114 Sunset Environmental 101.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25115 Sunset Environmental 34.38 Remndllation User Fee Refund 25116 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration 25117 BPS Technologies 535.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 26118 SSE Manufacturing,Inc. 5,696.16 Reconciliation User Fee Rotund Page 7 of 8 e Claims Paid From 1110100 to 1/31100 a , Warrant No. Vandor Amount Descrip0or, 25119 Taormina Industries,Inc. 1.213.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25120 The Orange County Register 737.10 Notices 8 Ads 25121 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,621.36 Mechanical Supplies 25122 Todd's Enterprises 020.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25123 Tomell A Co0en 957.83 Legal Services-Surge Claim 25124 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 249.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25125 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 126.00 Registration 25128 UC Regents 125.00 Registration 25127 UCLA Institute of Ne Environment 10,000.00 Coastal Water Quality Research Contribution 26128 Vasco Electro Lab 57.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25129 Vartep Process Systems 2.311.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25130 Vibration Institute 1,076.00 Training Registration 25131 Villa Park Orchards Assoc. 329.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25132 Vogel PetersonFumBure Co. 784.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25133 Welker Custom Coaling 57.00 Raconcillation User Fee Refund 25134 Wineries(Bma) 3,297AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25135 200018NVy-CWEA,Inc 3.000.00 Training Registration 25135 Patrick B.Carnahan 1.405.03 Meeling/freining Expense Reimb. 25137 Tom L Josway 1,124.74 Meeling/framing Expense Reimb. 25138 Gregory R.Mathews 483.60 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 25139 Peter M.Morrison 1,029.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb, Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.283.659.89 Y rt Payroll Dlsbureements 17764-17968 Employee Paychecks $ 116.906.48 BOP Do 17959-19094 Employee Paychecks 180.513.62 Bhvaekly Payroll 1/128I00 18095-18119 Employee Paychecks 4.664.17 Adluabnents 45635-46075 Direct Depose Statements 703,003.51 Biweekly Payroll 1/128/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,005,089.78 Wine Transfer Pavments Chase Bank of Texas Natural Association $ 408.678.43 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series B CeNBcale of Participation State Street Bank 5 Trust Co.of Co. 3,102,700.90 February Interest Payment on 1990.92 Advance Refund Certificate of Participation Total Who Transfer Payments $ 3.509.370.33 Total Claims Paid 111619a-1/31100 $ 8,798,129.00 Page 8 of 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng Date Ta ad.of Dk. 3fayoo AGENDA REPORT �Number 'en ty nbe, Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: NIA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A \VaEa'iVAat\vq MVn\}2PeMYY�B\VRF0.ESYJamapoq Mc aew.q snow Page 7 ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 2/1/00 -- 2/15/00 & 2116/00— 2131/00. BA \YN]nMalaldy.EldVnV3VaNtlAe\VR(0.E5`tlunap9tl Mic a..eea �e Page 2 < m - Claims Paid From 2/1/00[0 2/16/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Amounts Payable-Warrants 26140 Voided Check $ - - 25141 Computerized Facility Integration 252,003.57 Engineering Service J-25-1 25142 County of Orange 200,481.22 Construction 11-17.2 25143 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 31,715.00 Painting Maint Services MO 4-22-98 25144 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 86.620.04 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 25145 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 33.457.60 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 25146 Persons Engineering Science,Inc. 206,077.70 Engineering Services J-42 25147 Sencon Engineering,Inc. 32,629.85 Construction-Revenue Area No.7 Pipe Repairs 25148 South Coast Environmental Co. 91,630.00 Plant 2 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 26149 Southern California Gas Company 32,424.00 Natural Gas 25150 Voided Check - - 25151 Taylor-Dunn 31,560.57 Electric Cad Parts 26152 Tole Ranch/Magan Farms 78.131.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25153 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 25.544.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Computer Programming 25154 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 704.250.00 Construction 3-35R 83.11R 25165 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 477,508.19 Construction 3.38-1 25166 Union Bank of Califomia 53,056.46 Construction 3.38-1 25167 Union Bank of California 78.250.00 Construction 3.35 25168 Colich Bros. Ine.,DBA Colich&Sons 311,500.00 Construction 11-17-1 Litigation Settlement 25159 A-Plus Systems 2.289.30 Notices B Ads 25160 Great American Printing Co. 232.14 Office Supplies 25161 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1,000.00 Training Registration 25162 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lob Supplies 25163 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 1,200.00 Human Resources Service 26164 American Industrial Supply.Inc. 509.98 Building Supplies 25165 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 25166 Appleone Employment Service 5,730.67 Temporary Employment Services 25167 Arcus Data Security,Inc 106.80 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage 25168 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 552.00 Vacuum Truck Services 26169 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 25170 Aztec Supply Company 8,332.00 Construction-Maintenance Mezzanine 25171 ABBE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 2.355.00 Registration 25172 AT&T Wireless Services 3.725.32 Cellular Telephone Service 25173 AT&T Wireless Services 681.17 Cellular Telephone Supplies 25174 Battery Specialties 1,959.29 Batteries 25175 Best Towing Service 464.00 Towing Services 25176 Boyle Engineerng Corporation 5,474.65 Engineering Services 3.38.1 8 7-7-1 25177 Brown&Caldwell 22.385.94 Engineering Service P137&P2-35-3 25178 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,490.00 Pump Repair 25179 Carollo Engineers 937.12 Professional Service-User Fees Analysis 25180 Carollo Engineers 5,844.14 Engineering Services-J-59 25181 Cathcart Garda von Langen Engineers 1,570.00 Engineerng Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension 26182 Charles P.Crowley Co. 24.24 Instrument Pads Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From V11100 to 2M6/o0 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25183 Clarl4i0 of California,Inc. 193.95 Forklift Rental 25184 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 231.34 Office Supplies 26185 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,636.26 Electrical Supplies 25166 Contractors License Exam Center,Inc 2,225.00 Training Registration 25187 Cooper Energy Services 438.27 Engine Supplies 25188 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 25189 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 6 MAP Training 25190 Corporate Express 652.58 Office Supplies 25191 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.84 Truck Parts 25192 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 819.76 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25193 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 134.20 Communication Service Agreement 25194 County of Orange 66.00 Permit Fees 25195 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,926.97 Electrical Supplies 25198 CASA 11,000.00 Membership 25197 CDS/NEDCO 129.15 Electrical Supplies 2519B CSMFO 2000 Annual Conference 135.00 Registration 26199 David Wood Associates,Inc. 1,190.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 6 MAP Training 25200 Del Mar Analytical 1,186.00 Siosolids Analysis 25201 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 105.00 Paint Supplies 25202 DDB Engineering, Inc 9,256.50 Temporary Employment Services 25203 DGA Consultants, Inc. 6,157.00 Surveying Services MO 6A-94 252D4 Eberhard Equipment 657.28 Tractor Repair 25205 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 3,909.00 Medical Screening 26206 Electra-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25207 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,156.93 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 25208 Faxpress, Inc. 134.15 Printing Service 25209 FedEx Corporation 99.20 Air Freight 26210 Filter Supply Company 256.74 Filters 25211 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1.995.24 Lab Supplies 25212 Foothill Engineering 6 Dewatering, Inc. 12,777.50 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure 25213 Forked Engineering 6 Surveying,Inc. 16,627.58 Engineering Services P-183 25214 Fountain Valley Camera 213.04 Photo Supplies 25215 Fred Pryor Seminars 3.000.00 Training Registration 25216 Fry's Electronics 2,423.82 Computer Supplies 25217 Full Spectrum Anayecs, Inc. 420.00 Lab Instrument Service 26218 FM International, Inc. 17,414.26 Professional Services J-25-1 25219 Ganahl Lumber Company 370.75 Lumber/Hardware 25220 George Yardley Co. 6.99 Lab Supplies 25221 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Supplies 25222 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. M51 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 26223 Goldenwest Window Service 250.00 Window Cleaning Service 25224 WW Grainger, Inc 215.31 Compressor Supplies 25225 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 78.69 Janitorial Supplies 25226 Hach Company 1,039.08 Lab Supplies Page 2of7 '+' Claims Paid From 211100 to 2116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25227 Heiman Fire Equipment,Inc. 3,682.43 Safety Equipment 25228 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 144.00 Catering Services 25229 Home Depot 2.188.63 Small Hardware 25230 Hopkins Technical Products 1,272.04 Pump Supplies 25231 Hub Auto Supply 407.75 Truck Parts 25232 HI Standard Automotive 346.33 Automotive Supplies 25233 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,474.73 Printing Service 25234 Immigration&Naturalization Service 610.00 Filing Fees 25236 Industrial Motor&Control, Inc. 2,881.00 Instrument Supplies 26238 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 287.25 Lob Supplies 26237 International Time Recorder 305.00 Safety Supplies 25238 Interstate Battery Systems 185.25 Batteries 25239 Irvine Photo Graphics 23.56 Photographic Services 25240 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 25241 IBM Corporation 359A9 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 25242 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,582.57 Safety Supplies 25243 J.G.Tucker and Son. Inc. 6,355.75 Instrument Supplies 25244 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 7,944.46 Min.Constr.Serv.-Clean Junction Box, Install Safety Shower&Manhole Repair 26245 Jays Catering 8.419.15 Directors Meeting Expenses 25246 Jensen Instruments Co. 351.27 Instrument Supplies 25247 Jlm's Suspension Service 111.72 Truck Repairs 25248 Johnstone Supply 104.10 Electrical Supplies 25249 Karen Monaco&Associates 4,875.00 J.D.Edwards Service Agreement 25250 Kensington Electronics 813.53 Electrical Supplies 25251 Ken Companies/ExeouProv, Inc. 375.00 Registration 25252 Knowledge Point 130.50 Software Malnt. 25253 Knoxtindustrial Distribution Group 2,337.29 Tools 25254 Line-X Protective Coalinga 337.38 Vehicle Maint. 25255 Oareld R.Jones 6,174.47 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 25256 Lorman Education Services 189.00 Registration 25257 Lucci's 95.00 Meeting Expense 25258 Mamco International 835.33 Janitorial Supplies 25259 Mandic Motors 45.00 Towing Services 25260 MarVac Electronics 30.17 Instrument Supplies 25261 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 566.04 Tools 25262 McMurray-Slam 240.00 Office Supplies 25263 Mee Analytical System 10.075.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 25264 Medlin Controls Co. 1,697.77 Instrument Supplies 25265 Mesa Muffler 308.69 Truck Supplies 25266 Mettler-Toledo 10,67SAl WinBridge Standard Software Update 25267 Midway City Sanitary District 18,887.69 Construction J-73 Cooperative Project Program 25268 Midway Mfg It Machining Co. 10.927.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25269 Mission Uniform Service 2,098.88 Uniform Rentals 25270 Motorola Communications&Electronics 21.600.63 Communication Equipment Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 211100 to 2115/00 Warred No. Vendor Amount Description 25271 N.Glantz&Son 53.88 Tools 25272 Neal Supply Co. 108.61 Plumbing Supplies 25273 Network Generations, Inc. 437.20 Computer Supplies 25274 Nicholas Chevrolet 154.29 Truck Repairs 25275 Nmyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 7.147.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 25276 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 25277 Office Depot Business Services Div. 367.91 Office Supplies 25278 Optic,Software 1,8W.00 Optic,Form Implementation 25279 O ange County Sanitation District 126.81 Petty Cash Reimb. 25280 Oxygen Service Company 1,898.15 Specialty Gases 25281 OCB Reprographics 183.37 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25282 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 58.19 Electical Supplies 25283 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,248.90 Plumbing Supplies 25284 Prkhouse Tire Co. 211.55 Tires 25285 Parts Unlimited 365.68 Truck Supplies 25286 Penhall Company 12,000.00 Construction-Plant 2 Warehouse Removal 25287 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,398.29 Lab Supplies 25288 Permaseal 8W00 Lube Oil 25289 Pima Gm Systems,Inc, 18,252.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25290 Pitney Bowes 355.04 Postage Machine Service Agreement 25291 Pool Supply of Orange County 832.61 Operating Supplies 25292 Primary Source 10,023.17 Office Furniture 25293 PSI 951.61 Hardware 25294 0 Air-Calif.Div.Pump Engineering 307.50 Air Compressor Repair 25285 COS,LL.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 26296 Rick Buck 456.41 Recenciliafion User Fee Refund 25297 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 665.81 Auto Repair 25298 George L.Robertson 325.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25299 Rutan B Tucker L.L.P. 203.25 Legal Services-Craw-Winthrop Development 2530D RMS Systems Inc 339.00 Software Maim. 25301 RPM Electric Motors 1,87&25 Electric Motor Repair 25302 Santa Ana Electric Motors 540.91 Motor Repair 25303 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 122.48 Mechanical Supplies 25304 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1,000.59 Specialty Gases 25305 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 1,935.75 Lab Repairs 25306 Second-Sun 2,584.96 Light Fcdures 25307 Self-insurance Plans 948.61 State Workers'Compensation User Funding&Fraud Assessment 25308 Sheen Magan 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land 25309 Sheen Magan, Inc, 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land 25310 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 32.87 Tools 25311 Smmon, Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 25312 Sievers Instruments 320.00 Lab Supplies 25313 Society for HR Management 280.00 Notices&Ads 25314 Spading Instruments, Inc. 4,566.54 Flowmeters Page 4 of 7 '1 - a Claims Paid From 211100 to 2/16/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25315 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton,L.P. 1,282.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25316 Summit Steel 2,128.05 Metal 25317 Sunset Ford 42.58 Truck Supplies 25318 Sunset Industrial Parts 290.53 Mechanical Supplies 25319 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis 25320 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 993.43 Mechanical Supplies 2=1 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,334.93 Elevator Maintenance 25322 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 25323 Lisa L Tomko 500.07 MeeOng/lraining Expense Reimb. 25324 The Trans Company 5,474.09 Electrical Equipment Maint Service&Supplies 25325 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 381.23 Truck Supplies 25326 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 290.00 Lab Services 25327 Teksystems 3.975.00 Temporary Employment Services 25328 V&A Consulting Engineers 1,171.17 Engineering Services-Evaluating 1-12S Odor Treatment for Collection 25329 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.945.95 Plumbing Supplies 25330 Veme's Plumbing 140.00 Plumbing Equipment Testing 25331 VCI Mechanical 690.00 Electrical Service 25332 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,742.00 Lab Supplies 26333 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,906.72 Security Guards 25334 Wayne Electric Co. 599.00 Electrical Supplies 26335 WEF-Registration Dept 1,080.00 Registration 25336 Xerox Corporation 4,798.04 Copier Leases 25337 The Yakima Company 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land 25338 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 864.00 Construction 7-28 25339 Marcus D.Dubois 363.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25340 Donald F.McIntyre 1,675.62 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 25341 Edwin D.Ratiedge 474.80 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb. 25342 Efran G. Lucena&COMP USA 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 25343 Nonna C.Leopando 1,342.55 Employee Computer Loan Program 25344 Orange County Sanitation District 678.12 Petty Cash Reimb. 25345 John W.Weingarden 1,414.85 Employee Computer Loan Program 25346 Barclays Bank PLC 90,687.39 COP Letter of Credit 25347 Cafdomia Dept,of Fish and Game 5.00 Publication 25348 Orange County Sanitation Dishict 71.357.10 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 25349 Orange County Sanitation Dishict 409224.92 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25360 Southern California Edison 72,169.91 Power 25351 American Chemical Society 845.00 Training Registration 25352 American Express 12,289.52 Purchasing Card Program 25353 American Management Association 149.00 Registration 25354 AMP Incorporated 1,485.00 Training Registration 25355 ASMS Conference 1,600.00 Training Registration 26356 ASSE American Sm.of Safety Engineers 495.00 Registration 25357 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 247.67 Valve Supplies 25358 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 211I00 to ZI16I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25359 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 25360 Leandre P.Catacutan 343.10 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25361 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25362 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. BD8.77 Plumbing Supplies 25363 Contractors License Exam Center, Inc. 1,485.00 Training Registration 26364 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25365 Employers Group 365.00 Registration 25386 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25367 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25368 Expertune 598.00 Software Maintenance 25369 ESRI Inc. 1,600.00 Training Registration 25370 Anne Made Peery 274.59 Meeiing/Training Expense Reimb. 25371 Franchise Tax Board 76.76 Wage Garnishment 25372 Robert P.Ghirelli 757.96 Meeting?mining Expense Reimb. 25373 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership 25374 GIS 2000 749.00 Registration 25375 Hassled Methods 2,680.00 Training Registration&Maint.Software 25376 Inti Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 25377 Alrgas Dlrect Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,459.74 Safety Supplies 25378 ISA 120.00 Membership 26379 Jobtrak 96.00 Notices&Ads 25380 Law Journal Press 65.78 Publication 25381 Lerman Education Services 189.00 Registration 25382 Chris Maher 333.29 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25383 Donald F. McIntyre 180.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25384 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 295.55 Tools 25365 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.013.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25386 Business Training&Development Services 99.00 Training Registration 26387 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,548.00 Training Registration 25388 OhmartNEGA Corp. 495.00 Registration 25389 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25390 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25391 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 306.98 Fittings 25392 OCFA 576.95 Dues Deduction 25393 MWDOC 30.00 Training Registration 25394 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25395 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25396 Peace Officers Council of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction 25397 Pryor Resources, Inc. 149.00 Training Registration 25398 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 577.63 Paint Supplies 25399 Schenck Trebel 1,700.00 Training Registration 25400 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 25401 SkIIIPath On-Site 199.00 On-Site Training 25402 State of California 126.25 Wage Garnishment Page 6 of 7 a c • - Claim Paid From 2M100 to 2flSMO Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25403 Summit Steel 1,541.77 Metal 25404 SARBS-PDC 750.00 Training Registration 25405 SWOTF-Stonnwater Quality Task Force 10.00 Publication 25406 The Pittsburgh Conference 60.00 Registration 25407 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,992.33 Mechanical Supplies 25408 Robert C.Thompson 181.71 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb. 25409 Mark A.Tomko 402.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25410 The Training Masters 695 0D Training Registration 25411 Trident Data Systems 1,6110.01) Training Registration 25412 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 125.00 Registration 25413 WEF-Registration Dept 450.00 Registration 25414 3 Com Corporation 3,300.OD Training Registration 25415 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,890,782.66 Payroll Disbursements 18120-18283 Employee Paychecks $ 161.076.77 Biweekly Payroll 219100 18284-18286 Employee Paychecks 722.79 Adjustments 46076-46523 Direct Deposit Statements 664,653.81 Biweekly Payroll 2/9100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 827,053.37 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148,6D6.10 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 177,297.01 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 149,301.95 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Societe Generale 56,456.89 8(1199-1131100 Standby Letter of Credit Payment on 1993 COP Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 531.661.95 Total Claims Paid 211100-2I15100 $ 5.249.497.97 Page 7 of 7 Claim Paid From 2116100 to V29100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 25416 Air Products&Chemicals $ 70,335.39 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 25417 Blue Cross of Caffomia 172.078.12 Medical Insurance Premium 25418 Carollo Engineers 47,321.66 Engineering Services J-25-4 25419 Commercial Resources Tax Group 250,00o.D0 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. 25420 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42,676.36 5 Notebook Computers,9 HP Printers&5 Dell Monitors 25421 Delta Dental 41,663.17 Dental Insurance Plan 25422 DukeSolulions, Inc. 70,323.36 Natural Gas-Spec#170 25423 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25.255.35 Medical Insurance Premium 25424 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 95,027.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 25425 Lee&Ro,Inc. 34.022.79 Engineering Consulting Services-P2 39&P2-47-1 25426 Orange County Water District 176,421.98 Consulting Services J-36 25427 Polydyne,Inc. 43,866.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 25428 Voided Check - - 25429 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 37.479.47 Construction Pi-37 25430 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 69.734.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25431 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 36.457.20 Construction 541-1 25432 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 27.748.62 Construction 3-38-1 25433 Margate Construction,Inc. 393,900.36 Construction P2.39 25434 S.S.Mechanical Corp 350,847.40 Construction Pi-46-2&J-53 25435 Southern Contracting Company 97,632.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1 25436 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3.742.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 25437 Aearo Company 348.00 Safety Supplies 25438 Alrbome Express 133.90 Air Freight 26439 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 630.34 Manhole Frames&Covers 25440 Allina Medical Center 245.00 Employment Medical Services 25441 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Gr 1,200.00 Human Resources Service 26442 American Airlines 2.321.60 Travel Services 25443 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,056.72 Training Materials 25W Appleone Employment Service 6.905.18 Temporary Employment Services 25445 Applied Industrial Technology 3,4D3.70 Electrical Parts&Supplies 25446 Aumm Data Systems 144.80 Software Maint.Agreement 25447 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security Equipment Mainl. 25448 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines Registration-Ignition Timing 25449 ASR Analysis 640.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1 25450 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 35.15 Telephone Service 25451 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,848.14 Long Distance Telephone Service 25452 AT&T Wireless Services 123.40 Cellular Telephone Service 25453 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 25454 Battery Specialties 735.40 Batteries 25455 Bauer Compressors 3,990.05 Tools&Supplies 25456 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 15.868.58 Engineering Services-Can Gen Operating Philosophy Study Page 1 of 13 a Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25457 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,382.D0 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 25458 California Urban Water Conserv. Council 260.00 Membership 26459 Caltrol, Inc. 2,570.93 Electrical Parts&Supplies 25460 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,056.68 Instrument Parts 25461 Compressor Components Of California 4,697.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25462 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 1.769.79 Computer Maint.Agreement 25463 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 302.78 Electrical Supplies 26464 Consolidated Reprographics 21.60 Printing Services 25465 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 109.98 Plumbing Supplies 25466 Converse Consultants 433.70 Consulting Services-3.38-3 25467 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing 25468 Corporate Express 525.09 Office Supplies 25469 Cotelligem 2,047.50 Software Maint. 25470 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 374.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee 26471 County of Orange 285.50 Permit Fees 25472 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,976.68 Electrical Supplies 25473 Cytec Industries 12,838.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 25474 CEPA Company 1.121.44 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 25475 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 401.00 CCTV Inspection of Revenue Area 7 Sewers 25476 CWEA Annual Conference 295.00 Conference Registration 25477 David's Tree Service 650.00 Tree Maint.Service 25478 Del Mar Analytical 1,280.00 Biosolids Analysis 25479 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 206.52 Paint Supplies 25480 DAE Instruments 326.75 Electrical Supplies 25481 DGA Consultants, Inc. 5.112.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 25482 Eberhard Equipment 712.54 Tractor Repair 25483 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25484 Enviro Enterprises 2,193.91 Engineering Service-Trickling Fillers Evaluation 25485 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1,469.58 Software 25486 Faxpress,Inc. 719.23 Office Supplies 25487 FedEx Corporation 168.68 Air Freight 25488 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 317.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25489 Filter Supply Company 432.87 Filters 25490 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 64.46 Lab Supplies 25491 Thomas M.Flanagan 587.94 Meetingfrmining Expense Reimb. 25492 Flo-Systems, Inc. 133.62 Pump Supplies 25493 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,994.37 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium 25494 Fountain Valley Camera 90.32 Photo Supplies 25495 Franklin Covey 59.91 Office Supplies 26496 Fry's Electronics 556.78 Computer Supplies 25497 Full Spectrum Analyfics, Inc. 539.71 Lab Instrument Service 25498 City of Fullerton 111.30 Water Use Page 2 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25499 Ganahl Lumber Company 168.46 Lumber/Hardware 25500 Garrati-Callahan Company 4,844.77 Investment Advisor Service 25501 General Process Controls 3,449.03 Electrical Supplies 25502 GTE California 8,405.61 Telephone Services 25503 Getinge Castle 600.77 Lab Supplies 25504 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 2,721.64 Belt,Filter Press Supplies 25505 Golden Bell Products 15.295.50 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes 25506 WWGreinger, Inc. 1,417.67 Compressor Supplies 25507 Graseby S.T.I. 5,688.68 Engine Supplies 25508 GE Multilin, Inc. 2,864.00 Consulting Services-Electrical Supplies 25509 Heaker Equipment Company 370.35 Truck Supplies 25510 Hach Company 93.37 Lab Supplies 25511 David P. Halverson 169.71 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 25512 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 916.18 Plumbing Supplies 26513 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Dell 192.70 Catering Services 26514 HIM,Inc. 276.84 Tools 25515 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 2,250.00 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning 25516 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium 25517 Home Depot 681.03 Small Hardware 25518 City of Huntington Beach 48.00 Water Use 26519 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,953.04 Printing Service 25520 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 414.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25521 StaleNst 200.00 Online Service 25522 Information Resources 100.D0 Human Resources Service 25523 Interim Personnel 2.219.18 Temporary Employment Service 25524 ISCO C/O MRC Technology 549.53 Lab Supplies 25525 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 298.82 Safety Supplies 25526 IPI GremmTech, Inc 15,000.00 Software Maint.Agreement 25527 J&B Auto Parts 327.37 Auto Parts 3 Supplies 25528 J.G.Tucker and Son, Ina 378.75 Instrument Supplies 25529 James Martin&Co. 17,368.56 Software Maim.Agreement 25530 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-N 6 MSP Motor Removal 25531 Jay's Catering 210.11 Catering Services 25532 Jensen Instruments Co. 19351 Instrument Supplies 25533 K.S. Dunbar&Associates 8,750.00 Engineering Services 241 25634 K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 1.370.04 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 25535 Karen Monaco&Associates 5.687.50 FIS Support Services 25536 Kelly Paper 416.23 Paper 25537 Knox 2,019.88 Tools 25538 Lab Support 930.00 Temporary Employment Services 25539 Lexis-Nexis 98.27 Books&Publications 25540 Gerald R.Jones 4,505.15 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 Page 3 of 13 e Claims Paid From 2118/89 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25541 Mine Safety Appliances 271.88 Electrical Supplies 25542 MarVac Electronics 10.52 Electrical Supplies 25543 MasTec Network Services 595.86 Communication Equipment Upgrade 25W Donald F. McIntyre 297.67 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb. 25545 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 319.76 Tools 25546 Mellon Trust 15.815.10 Investment Custodian Bank 25547 Mid-West Associates 43.10 Pump Supplies 25548 Mission UnBonn Service 5,274.47 Uniform Rentals 25649 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 5.230.94 Engineering Service 5-41-1 25550 MotoPhoto 48.22 Photographic Services 25551 Nasco 285.54 Instrument Supplies 25552 National Plant Services, Inc. 1.250.00 Vacuum Truck Services 25653 National Safety Council/Western Region 290.00 Registration 25554 Neal Supply Co. 3.158.16 Plumbing Supplies 25555 NetManage, Inc. 3.313.31 AS/400 Software Maint. 25556 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 17,630.22 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 25557 Network Solutions,lnc. 11,870.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 25558 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,954.12 Office Supplies 25559 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 318.21 Plumbing Supplies 25560 Orange County Chapter-ISCEBS 25.00 Training Registration 25561 Orange County Sanitation District 22.56 Petry Cash Reimb. 25582 Oxygen Service Company 2,408.83 Specialty Gases 25563 OCB Reprographics 182.96 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25564 OCE-USA, Inc. 678.90 Computer Equipment Maint. 25565 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 120.66 Electrical Supplies 25566 Pacific Bell 16.71 Telephone Services 25567 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 25568 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,281.94 Plumbing Supplies 25569 Parker Hannifin Corporation 46.62 Mechanical Supplies 25570 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 19,450.27 Engineering Services J-42 26571 Peak Technologies 2,680.D9 Lab Supplies 25572 Permaseel 411.77 Luba Oil 25573 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 2.002.24 Temporary Employment Services 25574 Projects Partners 24,107.20 Temporary Employment Services 25575 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2.030.48 Mechanical Supplies 25576 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services 25577 Rain for Rent 2,798.15 Pump Rental 26678 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 26579 Reliastar 7,760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 25580 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 177.88 Electrical Supplies 25581 Russeleclrlc, Inc. 428.41 Electrical Supplies 25582 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 10,914.00 Engineering Services-2 Lunch/Traming Rooms Page 4 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25583 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 871.68 Mechanical Supplies 25584 Schwing America, Inc. 5.377.77 Pump Supplies 25585 City of Seal Beach 342.70 Water Use 25586 Second-Sun 670.01 Light Fixtures 25587 ShowCase Corporation 2,693.75 Software Maint. 25588 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 556.64 Tools/Hardware 25589 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 25590 So. Cal.Gas Company 22,151.34 Nature)Gas 25591 SoftChoice 1.477.26 Software 26592 Southern California Water Committee, Inc. 750.00 Membership 25593 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 250.00 Flowineter Calibration 25594 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 671.40 Janitorial Supplies 25595 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 506.16 Office Supplies 25596 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 25597 Summit Steel 194.11 Metal 25596 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 25599 Sunset Industrial Parts 136.97 Mechanical Supplies 25600 SARBS-CWEA 20.00 Membership 25601 Teledyne Analytical 164.56 Instrument Parts 2SW2 The Foxboro Company 112.23 Instrument Supplies 25603 The Meniweed Corporation 2,590.39 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 25604 The Orange County Register 880.20 Notices&Ads 25605 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 286.49 Mechanical Supplies 25606 Daily Pilot 112.50 Notices&Ads 25607 Trade Service Corporation 2,058.15 Software Maint. 25608 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,024.65 Truck Supplies 25609 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 110.00 Lab Services 26610 Teksystems 2,400.00 Temporary Employment Services 25611 United Parcel Service 286.74 Parcel Services 25612 Unocal Corporation 48.36 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 25613 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.545.56 Plumbing Supplies 25614 Vector Resources 4,413.18 Voica/Data Communication Services 25615 Veme's Plumbing 635.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 25616 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,312.62 Vision Service Premium 25817 Vortex Corp. 213.66 Door Repair 25618 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,268.90 Lab Supplies 25619 Weigh-Tronix, Inc. 732.66 Scale Repair 25620 Western States Chemical,Inc. 17,604.88 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 25621 Wesbux International 325.11 Truck Supplies 25622 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 872.78 Instrument Supplies 25623 Witeg Scientific 1,60.42 Lab Supplies 25624 WCT Products, Inc. 586.68 Instrument Supplies Page 5 of 13 e Claims Paid From 2/18/00 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25625 WS Atkins Water 19,500.00 Biosolids Testing Agreement 25626 Xerox Corporation 6,463.17 Copier Leases 25627 Xpedex Paper 8 Graphics 106.61 Office Supplies 25628 Yokogawa Corp.of America 191.93 Instrument Supplies 25629 CNA Trust 1,918.80 Construction 541-1 25630 Union Bank of California 3.083.19 Construction 3.38-1 25631 Codna Chaudhry and Best Buy 2,362.20 Employee Computer Loan Program 25632 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 195.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25633 Darrell Ennis and MASS Microsystems, Inc. 2,398.68 Employee Computer Loan Program 25834 Emilio Arislon and Circuit City 2,589.28 Employee Computer Loan Program 25635 Orange County Sanitation District 219.76 Petty Cash Reimb. 25636 Mahin Talebi 1,216.54 Employee Computer Loan Program 25637 Orange County Sanitation District 408,375.15 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25638 Southern California Edison 46,422.21 Power 25639 South Coast AGMD 18,054.32 Emissions Fee-Plant No.2 25640 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 148.20 Instrument Supplies 25641 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines-Catalytic Converters 25642 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 23.79 Telephone Service 25643 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 25644 Court Order 200.00 Wage Gamishment 25645 Cleugh's Rhubarb 2.536.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25648 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25647 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 10,286.27 Computer Maint.Agreement 2584E Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 128.28 Electrical Supplies 25649 CHMIA 30.00 Registration 25M CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership 26651 Cade D.Dillon 350.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25652 DWG Associates 500.00 Professional Services-Plant Automation Project 25653 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25654 Chris Krietxil/Fashion Fair Laundry 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25655 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,921.25 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25656 Thomas M. Flanagan 248.74 Meeting/1-raining Expense Reimb. 25657 Fluke Electronics Corporation 628.00 Electrical Supplies 25658 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment 25659 GTE California 1,000.38 Telephone Services 25660 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 25661 Irvine Ranch Water District 53.22 Water Use 25662 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 13,506.76 Safety Supplies 25663 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 512.34 Safety Supplies 25664 Gregory R.Mathews 522.38 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25665 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.599.48 Tools 266W Monster.Com 275.00 Notices 8 Ads Page 6 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25667 Multiquip 139.10 Pump Supplies 25668 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1,014.00 Training Registration 25669 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12.69 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 25670 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.19 Electrical Parts&Supplies 25671 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25672 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25673 Oxygen Service Company 254.90 Specialty Gases 25674 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction 25675 Pacific Bell 1,119.32 Telephone Services 25676 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25677 Parkhouse Tire Co. 665.59 Tires 25678 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25679 Peace Officers Council of CA 765.00 Dues Deduction 25680 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 43.31 Mechanical Supplies 25681 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 692.39 Tools 25682 Sheraton Newport Beach 12,000.00 Hunt.Bch. Issue Meeting Expense 25683 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 208.16 Tools/Hardware 25684 South Coast AQMD 12,012.71 Emissions Fee-Plant No. 1 25685 State of California 141.09 Wage Garnishment 25686 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 25687 University of Washington 525.00 Training Registration 25688 Water Education Foundation 115.00 Membership 25689 Donald F.McIntyre 679.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25690 Michael D.Moore 180.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25691 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 105.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25692 RPI/Bio Gro 154,959.97 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 25693 Brown&Caldwell 437,417.60 Engineering Service P1-37 25694 Carollo Engineers 26,895.76 Engineering Service J-39 25695 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 193,661.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 25M Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 72,23625 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 25697 Orange County Water District 30,925.92 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 25698 Pacific Investment Management Co. 111,011.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 25699 Painewebber Incorporated 69,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 25700 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 246,299.33 Engineering Services J-42 25701 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 390,548.74 Residuals Removal MO 329-95 25702 Projects Partners 31,692.10 Temporary Employment Services 25703 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 34,701.30 Contract Services-Sewer Cleaning 25704 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72.958.61 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 25705 SPEC Services,Inc. 76,602.66 Engineering Services J-33-1 25706 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 59,539.89 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 25707 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 81,106.91 Legal Services MO 7-26-96 25708 Bernard Construction Company, Inc. 1,248,300.00 Construction 3-35R&3.11R Page 7 of 13 - Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 25709 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 416,981.72 Construction 3-38-1 25710 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 28,347.05 Construction P2-65 25711 Union Bank of California 46.331.30 Construction 3-38-1 25712 Union Bank of California 138,700.00 Construction 3-35 25713 Union Bank of California 121,546.07 Construction P1-46-2&J-53 25714 Adamson Indusbies 1,753.31 Lab Supplies 25715 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 4,235.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 25716 Aearo Company 452.00 Safety Supplies 25717 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 330.80 Lab Supplies 25718 Air Cold Supply 70.16 Air Conditioner Repairs 25719 Air Products 8 Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies 2572D Airbome Express 117.00 Air Freight 25721 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 865.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 25722 Appleone Employment Service 11,054.97 Temporary Employment Services 25M Applied Industrial Technology 1,478.69 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 25724 Arcus Data Security 166.80 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage 25725 Asbury Environmental Services 82.50 Waste Oil Removal 25726 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 24.24 Plaques 25727 Voided Check - - 25728 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 380.99 Telephone Service 25729 American Telephone d Telegraph Corp. 183.01 Telephone Service 25730 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,152.28 Long Distance Telephone Service 25731 AT 8 T Wireless Services 4,140.36 Cellular Telephone Service 25732 Bailey, Fisher&Porter 432.21 Electrical Supplies 25733 Battery Specialties 145.46 Batteries 25734 Bentley Systems, Inc. 5,387.50 Software Maintenance Agreement 25736 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,566.96 Engineering Services 3-38-1 8 6-13 25736 Bureau Of Business Practice 158.95 Publication 25737 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7.276.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 26738 BNI Building News 109.43 Publication 25739 C&H Distributions,Inc. 233.10 Tool Cabinet 25740 Cal-Glass,Inc. 140.08 Lab Equipment Service 25741 Calif Centrifugal Pump 7,376.21 Pump Supplies 25742 Southern California Marine Institute 7,245-00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 25743 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,568.61 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 25744 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 16.16 Office Supplies 25745 Compressor Components Of California 14.546.25 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 25746 Compu Master 895.00 Registration 25747 Computers America,Inc. 272.79 Computer Supplies 25748 Connell GM Parts 245.67 Truck Supplies 25749 Consolidated Elect. Distrbutors.Inc. 1,576.31 Elechical Supplies 25750 Consolidated Freighlways 602.15 Freight Page 8 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25761 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 748.71 Plumbing Supplies 26752 Controloo 177.62 Electrical Supplies 25753 Converse Consultants 5,274.48 Consulting Services-P2-60 8 J-33-1 25764 Cooper Energy Services 9,378.46 Engine Supplies 25765 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 25756 Corporate Express 356.49 Office Supplies 25757 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 25758 Cost Containment Solutions 2.867.20 Worker's Comp.Services 25759 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 405.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 26760 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 70.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee 25761 Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc. 11,928.16 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 25762 CA Emissions Program 17.70 Emissions Testing Program 25763 CASA 250.00 Conference Registration 25764 CEPA Company 616.25 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 25765 CHEMetrics,Inc. 94.17 Lab Supplies 25766 CH2MHill 4,806.75 Engineering Services-Microfiltration Demonstration Project 25767 CR&R,Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals 25768 CWEA Annual Conference 1,945.00 Conference Registration 257W CWEA Membership 150.00 Membership 25770 David's Tree Service 150.00 Tree Maint.Service 25771 Del Mar Analytical 685.00 Biosolids Analysis 25772 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 165.76 Lab Supplies 25773 Diamond H Recognition 42.79 Employee Service Awards 25774 Dunn-Edwarda Corporation 362.88 Paint Supplies 25775 DDB Engineering, Inc. 22,228.00 Temporary Employment Services 25776 DGA Consultants, Inc. 2,808.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 25777 Electra-Bond 2,200.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25778 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25779 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 11,849.62 Consulting Services-FIS Support 25780 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 943.70 Lab Supplies 25781 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 8,864.78 Professional Services J-40-4 25782 Equipment Life Technology 287.64 Mechanical Supplies 25783 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,013.27 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 25784 Faxpress, Inc. 3.313.27 Office Supplies 25785 FBdEx Corporation 74.15 Air Freight 25786 Fitter Supply Company 808.92 Filters 25787 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.26 Orange County Property Information Subscription 25788 First Metro Appraisals 1,875.00 Sakioka Easement Appraisal 25789 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 601.05 Lab Supplies 25790 Flo-Systems, Inc. 14,324.65 Pump Supplies 25791 Fountain Valley Camera 51.36 Photo Supplies 25792 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 242.00 Truck Wash Tickets Page 9 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116/00 to 2129I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 25793 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 1,629.49 Paint Supplies 25794 Fred Pryor Seminars 89.00 Training Registration 25795 Fry's Electronics 1,180.25 Computer Supplies 25796 General Electric Supply Company 5,487.17 Electric Parts 25797 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.656.48 Lumber/Hardware 25798 Callan Associates,Inc. 1,440.08 Investment Advisor Service 25799 Gates Fiberglass Installers 3,564.82 Fiberglass Repair 25800 GTE California 93.58 Telephone Services 25801 George Yardley Go. 515.63 Lab Supplies 25802 Gibson,Dunn 8 Crutcher,L.L.P. 7,260.00 Legal Services -Burge Claim 25803 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 23,526.36 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 25804 Goveming 15.00 Publication 25805 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership 25806 WW Grainger, Inc. 3.630.72 Compressor Supplies 25807 Graseby S.T.I. 785.44 Engine Supplies 25808 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1.181.75 Janitorial Supplies 25809 GBC(General Binding Corp) 633.03 Printing Service 25810 Edwards Systems Technology 2,125.00 Safety Service Agrement 25811 Harold Primrose Ice 112.00 Ice For Samples 25812 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 908.99 Plumbing Supplies 25813 Heiman Fire Equipment,Inc. 6.132.03 Safety Equipment 25814 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 673.08 Catering Services 26815 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 1.020.76 Compressor Parts 25816 Home Depot 857.21 Small Hardware 25817 Hopkins Technical Products 421.06 Pump Supplies 25818 Hub Auto Supply 301.69 Tmdc Parts 25819 City of Huntington Beach 14,451.57 Water Use 25820 Hunts Final Phase 3,636.83 Misc.Construction Services-Admin. Bldg.Acoustic Modifn. 25821 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,163.70 Printing Service 25822 Industrial Air Compressor 2,590.83 Air Compressor 26823 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 915.74 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26824 StateNet 200.00 Online Service 26825 Interim Personnel 688.15 Temporary Employment Service 25826 Interstate Battery Systems 242.17 Batteries 25827 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.13 Photographic Services 25828 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 25829 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 171.40 Safety Supplies 25830 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 734.10 Instrument Supplies 25831 Jays Catering 1,766.28 Catering Services 26832 Jlm's Suspension Service 35.00 Truck Repairs 25833 Johnstone Supply 463.26 Electrical Supplies 25834 JLM Contracting 259.73 Construction Service-Pipe Repair Page 10 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25835 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 4,290.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 25836 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 0,437.50 PIS Support Services 26837 Knox 7.873.96 Tools 25838 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 79.61 Safety Supplies 25839 Lab Support 2,522.62 Temporary Employment Services 25840 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 6,112.52 Engineering Service-Plant No. 1 Dust Collection System 25841 Lexis-Nexis 6.27 Books 8 Publications 25842 Llebert Cassidy 1,695.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 25843 Gerald R.Jones 4.487.95 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 25844 Luccl's 100.00 Meeting Expense 25845 Maintenance Products,Inc. 3,058.87 Mechanical Supplies 25846 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 212.56 Tools 25847 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 1,020.66 Boxes 25848 Mee Analytical System 750.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 25849 Medlin Controls Co. 000.39 Instrument Supplies 25850 Mesa Muffler 280.12 Truck Supplies 25851 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 3,737.71 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26852 Miller Equipment Co. 574.99 Pump Repair 25853 Mission Uniform Service 3,697.31 Uniform Rentals 25854 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 188.67 Publications 25855 Monarch Instrument 11,335.91 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25856 Monitor Labs,Inc. 978.93 Instrument Maint. 25857 Monterey Mechanical Co. 10.00 Mailing Fee Refund 25858 Moody's Investo/s Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 25859 Neel Supply Co. 385.26 Plumbing Supplies 25860 New Pig 1.225.94 Spill Absorbent Materials 25861 City of Newport Beach 65.35 Water Use 25862 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 13,128.17 LubrlwnUDiesel Fuel 25803 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 9.028.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 25864 NAS Associates,Inc. 1.597.35 Lab Services 25865 Northwestern Carbon 2,761.87 Filters 25866 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 516.00 Lab Services 26867 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.736.80 Office Supplies 25868 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 1,129.45 Grease Pump 26869 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 159.18 Plumbing Supplies 25870 Orange County Forum 35.00 Registration 25871 Orange County Sanitation District 90.00 Petty Cash Reimb. 25872 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1.339.07 Fittings 25873 Oxygen Service Company 1,887.80 Specialty Gases 25874 OCB Reprographics 4,953.78 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25875 Pacific Bell 34.52 Telephone Services 25876 Pacl6c Mechanical Supply 1,765.82 Plumbing Supplies Page 11 of 13 -. Claims Paid From 2116/00 to 2/29/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25877 Pagenet 2,195.03 Paging Services 25878 Palmieri,Tyler,Wiener,Wilhelm&Waldron 546.00 Legal Service-Sakloka Easement, Contract 7-1E 25879 Parts Unlimited 725.45 Truck Supplies 26880 Patriot Video Productions 390.83 Video Taping Services 25881 Polydyne, Inc. 12,923.20 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 25882 Power Design 3.356.41 Electrical Supplies 26883 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 25884 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 437.54 Mechanical Supplies 25885 Pump Engineering Wor 0-Air 1,988.45 Pump Supplies 25886 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 25887 Red Wing Shoes 164.84 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 25888 R.A.Reed Electric 5,339.41 Motor Overhaul 25889 Rick Arbour 8 Associates 3.108.43 Consulting Service-0 8 M Worker Competency 8 Training Project 25890 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 568.52 Auto Repair 25891 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 995.00 Engineering Service-Laboratory Seismic Evaluation 25892 RPM Electric Motors 4,908.01 Reliance Motor 8 Pump 25893 RIPS Industries 1,148.97 Electrical Supplies 25894 Safety-Kleen 5,526.60 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 25895 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 4.22 Mechanical Supplies 25896 Schwing America, Inc. 1,262.00 Pump Supplies 25897 Scott Specialty Genes, Inc. 123.54 Specialty Gases 25898 Second-Sun 851.55 Light Fixtures 26899 Shureluck Sales 6 Engineering 1,522.25 Tools/Hardware 25900 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 25901 Sievers Instruments 450.00 Lab Supplies 25902 Solder Station One Inc.-West 474.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25903 South Coast Environmental Co. 7,609.17 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 25904 Southern California Edison 16.10 Power 26905 Southern California Water 67.49 Water Use 25906 Sparklets 1,863.78 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 25907 Standard&PWeS 1.000.00 Analytical Services 25908 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton, L.P. 635.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25909 Successodes,Inc. 341.44 Pictures for New Plant 2 Maint. Bldg. 25910 Summit Steel 379.46 Metal 25911 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 25912 Sunset Ford 385.84 Truck Supplies 25913 SARBS-PDC 2,000.00 Training Registration 25914 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1.079.91 Electric Cart Parts 25915 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 284.90 Publication 25916 Teledyne Analytical 75.00 Instrument Parts 25917 The Foxboro Company 1,733.72 Instrument Supplies 25918 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3.741.12 Mechanical Suppfes Page 12 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2/29100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25919 Time Motion Tools 57.03 Tools 25920 Transcat 751.95 Electrical Supplies 25921 Track&Auto Supply,Inc. 329.44 Truck Supplies 25922 Teksyslems 4,180.30 Temporary Employment Services 25923 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 25924 Ultra Scientific 130.94 Lab Supplies 25925 Undersea Graphics Inc. 19,250.00 Contract Service-Oudall Inspection 25926 United Parcel Service 629.82 Parcel Services 25927 V&A Consulting Engineers 10,372.90 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 25928 Valley Cities Supply Company 10.99 Plumbing Supplies 25929 Verve's Plumbing 290.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 25930 Vortex Industries, Inc. 104.00 Door Repair 25931 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.963.89 Lab Supplies 25932 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,277.37 Security Guards 25933 West-Lde Supply Company, Inc. 236.03 Electrical Supplies 25934 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 1809.89 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 25935 Xerox Corporation 15,213.71 Copier Leases 25938 Matthew And Stewart Co., Inc. 8.813.00 Construction 11-23 25937 Systems Integrated 16.410.40 Construction Services J-31-3 25938 American Management Association 169.00 Registration 25939 Terri L.Josway 102.36 Office Supplies Reimb. 25940 Donald F.McIntyre 100.77 Cellular Expense Reimb. 25941 Robert Oaten 524.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25942 George L.Robertson 184.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25943 Gary G.Streed 485.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25944 Ernest N.Yeboah 819.17 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb. 25945 Albert E. Simpson&Willow Data Systems 1,895.11 Employee Computer Loan Program 25946 Albert E.Simpson&Micro Center 330.31 Employee Computer Loan Program 25947 Orange County Sanitation District 352.68 Petty Cash Reimb. 25948 Thomas E.Gaworski&MASS Microsystems 2,714.33 Employee Computer Loan Program 25949 Wanda Hagerty&Gateway, Inc. 2.989.74 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,770,474.19 Payroll Disbursements 18287-18411 Employee Paychecks $ 162.852.07 Biweekly Payroll 2/23100 46524-46968 Direct Deposit Statements 677,214.47 Biweekly Payroll 2/23100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ $40,086.54 Total Claims Paid 2116/00-2129100 $ 8,616,540.73 Page 13 of 13 -. " BOARD OF DIRECTORS Maanny Data To Bd.OIO r. o�zyao AGENDA REPORT ��"umw to- w 9ra1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES: "PHYSICAL DISABILITY" DISCRIMINATION, NORMAN PARSONS V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages: "Physical Disability' Discrimination, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 811565), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY On March 6, 2000, Mr. Norman Parsons served the District with a Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages: "Physical Disability" Discrimination. This Complaint alleges discrimination due to physical disability. Please see attached memo from General Counsel dated March 9, 2000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from General Counsel dated March 9, 2000 GGS:SK:BG H M9 EYVpM+llau,a.Apn flpvb�9a,U�pMPKUY`�OAm W")Ox Rwa�J. YIOW w V DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 23, 2000 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 23, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peer Swan,Vice Chair Don Hughes Pat McGuigan, Chairman,OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Director Brian Donahue Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Directors Absent: Don McIntyre, General Manager Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Lisa Tomko,Acting Director of Human Resources (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the January 26, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 February 23, 2000 tir v (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Debay welcomed Director Brian Donahue to the meeting as her guest. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there was a spill Monday afternoon in the Buena Park/La Mirada area when a sewer line surcharged. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, said that the Regional Board has been notified and a written report is due by Friday. It is estimated that about 10,000 gallons may have flowed into the stone drain,which ultimately emptied into the ocean via the San Gabriel River. The OC Health Care Agency has closed the beach in the area of the mouth of the river, citing a sewage spill. Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee members on the problems with the valve and spring assemblies during the rebuilding of the central power generation engines. Additional investigation is being done, including destructive testing, to help identify and quantify the cause. A discussion followed on various issues related to treating and permitting Urban Runoff. Staff continues to meet with developers regarding terns and conditions for dry weather urban runoff permits. A memo (copy attached to minutes)dated February 23, 2000 was reviewed. The Committee directed staff to pursue Option 2: to accelerate efforts to study the hydraulic and quality impacts of accepting dry weather urban runoff and to provide a recommendation to the Board on the long-term policy decision regarding the acceptance of dry weather urban runoff in April. Each request will be considered separately to evaluate the potential impact on permit limits. The OMITS will oversee the policy development before sending to the Board in April. The other committees will be informed also. Director Swan suggested getting more pro active with the legislature to allow the treatment of urban runoff without penalty and avoid mandates. Mr. Ghirelli discussed the expert panel that will be convening February 28, 29 and March 1 to review the steps taken during the July 1999 beach closure. USC representatives will prepare a written summary of the deliberations and recommendations. Mr. Ghirelli reported that the wet weather has caused problems with biosolids disposal. Wet weather rates are in farce. Fewer loads are being trucked offsite, and more is being temporarily stored onsite. Lisa Tomko,Acting Director of Human Resources, provided the members with a brief history of the Step 5 Grievance on the Board agenda and stressed that it is not a disciplinary issue. Mr. McIntyre reported on a meeting he attended at the County on septic tank removals. The County is considering the removal of septic systems as part of the elimination of County islands. A good estimate is that there are about 3000 properties on septic in the County. The Health Care Agency will be contacted to see if they are to become involved in this issue. It is expected that Director Lynn Daucher from Brea will address the Steering Committee on this issue in either March or April. A written report will be provided before the next Steering Committee meeting. The members expressed concern about the fairness of providing relief to homeowners for future connections. W Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 23,2000 (n REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported that he will be briefing the Board members at tonight's meeting closed session on Crow Winthrop and also the resolution reached regarding the sale of the Sakioka property easement. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Proposed March 25 Directors Workshop on GWR Project. The District's representatives on the GWR Joint Coordinating Committee have expressed some concern that some of the new Board members aren't very familiar with the project and could have questions on the issues. A workshop will be held on Saturday, March 25 between 8 and 11 to discuss the status of the project,what problems are anticipated, and what changes are being considered. In a related discussion, Director Swan suggested a workshop to discuss the consolidation of rates. It was decided that this would be a special discussion item at a future FAHR Committee meeting. B. Policy Decisions re Dry Weather Urban Runoff Issues. See discussion under Report of General Manager. C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY Chair Debay asked that Russell Patterson be invited to the April Steering Committee meeting, followed by Steve Anderson in May. Jim Ferryman will be attending the March meeting. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Swan asked that staff begin planning for a Directors Workshop to help educate the Board members on Impending financing Issues and Issuance of debt. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 22. 2000 at 5 p.m. W Minutes of the Steering Committee ; Page 4 February 23,2000 The next Board Meeting is scheduled for March 22, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m. bmitted by: g µ e h Tappan (!"ring Committee Secretary "I. .,WIS dqM 141 mIbebV✓MWbt1A0lYWi0a r r' Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1, 2000— 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 1, 2000, in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Peter Green Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Anna Piercy Barbara Collins, Senior Financial Analyst Charles E. Sylvia Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Kenneth Blake Directors Absent: Others Present: Joy Neugebauer (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the December 1, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Alternate Director Kenneth Blake abstained. S Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 ^ March 1, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair gave no report (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reminded the Directors of the Groundwater Replenishment System Workshop to be held jointly with the Orange County Water District on Saturday, March 25 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Director Jan Debay suggested that because of potential director turnover the end of this year that alternate directors also be invited to attend this workshop. Blake Anderson outlined the various reasons for holding this workshop and the decisions that would need to be made in January of next year of whether to continue with the project. Mr. McIntyre also advised the Directors of an article that should appear in the Register on the following day regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System by Gary Robbins. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, reported he was in Washington, D.C. and met with the Orange County Delegation to discuss water quality issues. This is the third year Orange County Sanitation District has been invited to attend this forum. Others included the Orange County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County, and MWD. Issues discussed were Cal-fed and delta water issues, GWRS funding, California's allocation of the Colorado River, water quality issues, biosolids for agricultural application, groundwater replenishment and dairy issues. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles gave no report. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten indicated there had been limited extra flow due to the recent rains. Peak flows have averaged approximately 300 mgd. The capacity of our outfall is 480 mgd. However, the rain has affected some of the biosolids haulers' sites for solids. Because of that the solids have had to be hauled to wet weather sites at a much higher premium cost. Mr. Ooten discussed AQMD Rule 1191 regarding various altemative fuel vehicles. AQMD is changing the original intent of that rule but it has not been released yet. This will mean that we will not be forced to purchase only alternative fuel vehicles for all of our applications. We had informed AQMD that alternative fuel vehicles are not available in all of the size Gasses of trucks we use. The central generation engines are in the process of being overhauled. One of the engines sustained considerable damage when, a few days after being returned to service, an exhaust valve spring broke and the valve fell into the cylinder. The piston battered itself, the cylinder, 1 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee All Page 3 March 1,2000 the head, and the valve, damaging all four. It will cost approximately$200,000 to repair the engine. A study is currently underway to determine who is liable for the repair costs. Directors asked questions regarding the AOMD ruling and the use of alternative fuel vehicles. Mr. Dolan indicated they would be doing additional research into electrical vehicles. (10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Mr. Ghirelli reported that the dry weather urban runoff diversion policy issues will be brought to the OMTS Committee in April. Policies need to be adopted that provide for long-term permits. Two permit requests currently under review are for Hearthside Homes and The Irvine Company. Permits will need to be in place before the Coastal Commission will grant these companies approval to build on the development sites. An expert panel of 10 scientists just concluded a three-day session reviewing the efforts regarding the Huntington Beach bacteria closure last summer. Mr. Ghirelli reviewed the key points of their review. The District was commended for its extensive efforts in trying to determine the source of bacteria; the frequency and level of monitoring the water; and had set a very high standard of expectation for others, as well as the District, to follow in the future. The panel also thought that: the District should not have been the lead agency; the District should have begun to look toward urban runoff testing earlier on in the process; early testing should have been completed to determine If the problem was human or animal bacteria; and other water sources, such as the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh, should have been tested sooner. Blake Anderson also advised that currently there is no sufficient contingency plan in place to avoid what happened last year from reoccurring again this summer. Lead responsibility has not been decided between the County, the City, the District, and others. Discussion among Directors concluded the only thing that could be planned would be to try and gather funds from other agencies involved to do additional source testing. It was also suggested that possibly dry weather run-off from the Santa Ana River could be captured and sent to the treatment plant for treatment Staff is evaluating the technical issues that may impact the District if dry weather urban runoff continues to divert to our system. Mr. Anderson also stated that while meeting with the Orange County Delegation in Washington, D.C., Assemblyman Rohrbacher indicated an interest in sponsoring a bill to protect the coast. However, there is only a two-week period to get the bill written and submitted in time for consideration. Mr. Ghirelli then briefly updated the directors on the Central Valley biosolids issues including progress on acquiring Tule Ranch in Kings County and the composting services by the Yakima Company. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 V March 1, 2000 (12) ACTION ITEMS (Items) a. OMTSOO-01: Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the biosolids management contracts with Pima Gro, Bio Gro,Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations and contractor performance. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (13) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-b) a. OMTS00-02 Biosolids Management Quarterly Report Bob Ghirelli gave a brief update on the District's biosolids. He also reported that the District is one of three hundred participants in a blind study of the radioactive quality of biosolids. It was noted that previous tests have shown radioactivity levels are very low in the District's effluent and biosolids. b. OMTSOO-03 Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study Report Mark Esquer updated the Directors on the benchmarking study the District has been involved with. The Directors commended Mark on the achievements and the quality of the benchmarking. Blake Anderson also commended Barbara Collins for her extensive work and coordination in bringing all of the data together to move this project along. Director Debay suggested that this presentation should be utilized at the next CASA meeting. (14) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Director Swan requested a report on the needs of the Operations Department for groundwater replenishment system overflow, as well as what other agencies are going on fuel cell technology. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 March 1, 2000 (17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for April 5, 2000 at 5 p.m. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submi ed by: Penny Kyl Operations, Ma' enance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\wp.dta�penda\OMT5\2000VAInutm\030100 Mlnul e.dm OMTSCOMMITTEE MxGngDate ToBd.&Dir. 3/1/2000 312212000 AGENDA REPORT nemNumEe ItrmNum oM 0 01 / /e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli D.Env, Director of Technical Services Originator: Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager, Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: Biosolids Management Budget Consolidation GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the District's four biosolids management contracts with Pima Gro, Bio Gro, Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations, and contractor performance. SUMMARY The District currently contracts with four biosolids management contractors (Pima Gro, Bio Gro, Tule Ranch, and the Yakima Company) to land apply biosolids in Kings, Kern, Riverside, and San Diego counties. At the time these contracts were entered, there was a surplus of permitted land for biosolids land application in the region. Several biosolids management companies competed to manage the material. Individual funding for each biosolids management contractor was approved by the Board of Directors at their August and November 1999 Board meetings. With an ever-changing regulatory framework affecting biosolids management, long-range planning continues to be a challenge for the District and our biosolids management contractors. The State Water Resources Control Board has taken the lead in developing a general order for the land application of biosolids. Unfortunately this proposed rule does not preempt the development of local or county biosolids regulations. A number of counties have developed, or are in the process of developing their own ordinances related to biosolids management. These range from those counties that incorporate federal standards (Part 503) and impose few additional siting requirements (e.g., Riverside County), to ones that allow only Class A biosolids (e.g., Tulare County), to bans on applications in unincorporated areas (e.g., the proposed final Kern County Ordinance), to complete bans (e.g., San Joaquin County). These changes in regulations, along with regional climatic concerns, and contractor performance, have resulted in frequent adjustments to biosolids allocations between the biosolids management contractors. Changes in load allocations have resulted in numerous change orders having to be made by staff during the past year to transfer funds between contractors' accounts. Staffs request for specific amounts for each contractor is a best estimate of the anticipated service required from each contractor at the time of entering the contracts. Many, if not all, of the factors that cause a change in the allocation of loads were difficult to anticipate at the time that the Board approved the individual biosolids management contract funding. X R�M RwaM. ermve Page 1 At the August 1999 Board of Directors meeting, the Board authorized staff to: • Amend the Districts contract with Pima Gro Systems, Inc., (contract period from 06/30/00 through 06130101) with two additional one-year extensions and increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from $21.92 to $25.90 for fair weather management, and $33.70 for inclement weather management for an annual amount not to exceed $1,993,000; and, • Amend the District's contract with Bio Gro (contract period from 04/26/00 to 06/30/02) by increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from $21.45 to$25.45 for fair weather management and from $29.00 to $36.00 for inclement weather management, for an annual amount not to exceed $1,775,000. At the November 1999 Board of Directors meeting, the Board authorized staff to: • Amend the District's contract with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a portion of the District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years (contract period 01/10/00 through 01/10/03) for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an annual amount not to exceed $2,540,000; and, • Enter into a contract with the Yakima Company (contract period 01/10/00 through 01/10110) to land apply a portion of the District's biosolids at$25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees, during the compost site permitting and development period for an annual amount not to exceed $775,000. Staff is requesting that the funds approved by the Board at their August and November 1999 Board meetings for individual biosolids management contractors be placed into one account to be used for payment of all four biosolids management contractors in order to avoid having to create frequent budget change orders. This biosolids holding account would contain $7,083,000 (the sum of the four management contracts). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES NIA H My.WvpentlalOMlSF4TApenOa Ra{vR510Mi5901 M R.,�e. arxi9e Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A H4 .dh�MTgMWAVn RephWMI99U1.6Y Page 3 Rn�aG erm'ae \ I DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, March 2, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design,and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 2, 1999,at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Guy Carrozzo Bob Doter, Director of Operations & Gerald Sigler Maintenance Russell Patterson Doug Stewart,Engineering Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor John Linder, Construction Manager Directors Absent: Chuck W insor, Engineering Supervisor Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Christina Shea Jim Burror,Contract Project Manager Lynn Daucher William Cassidy, Project Manager Brian Donahue,Vice Chair Terri Josway, Safety Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair Doug Cook,Operations Manager Mark Esquer, Process Support Manager Steve Kozak, Risk Manager Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PDC Committee Minutes V Page 2 March 2, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 3, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the proceedings of the Expert Panel that reviewed the actions during last summer's beach closure. A written report will be forthcoming. The main criticism from the Panel was that too much time was spent on looking for a break in the sewer line. They also raised the question on whether the District should be the lead agency in these situations. Several suggestions were offered on how to better handle similar events in the future. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager did not make a report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, asked John Linder to provide the Committee members with a heads up on Contract 3-35R,a $7.7 million manholes and pipeline system repair and rehabilitation project that runs from Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley through Westminster, Garden Grove, Stanton, Anaheim and ends in Fullerton. Negotiations will begin with the contractor for an equitable adjustment to the contract as a result of stopping the remaining work on the pipeline repairs. The pipeline is in much worse condition than anticipated and the repairs are much more extensive and would increase the price of the contract significantly. Staff will reevaluate and redesign the pipeline repairs and prepare the work as a separate contract. The manhole rehabilitation portion of the contract will be completed. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. There were two Change Orders that required PDC Committee approval. V PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 March 2, 2000 (11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT There were no PSAs or Addenda approved by the General Manager from January 27 through February 23, 2000. (12) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Information only item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. (13) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg presented the monthly progress report. The project is in the preliminary engineering phase. Twenty of the 32 design memoranda are in progress. The Joint Coordinating Committee will be reviewing the information as the project develops. The project is on schedule and on budget. A health risk assessment is underway to compare the quality of the reclaimed water with MWD water. This should be completed in July 2000.The Title 22 Engineers Report should be complete in June. The US Bureau of Reclamation has allocated $20 million for the project in its budget, of which $1.5 million is included in this year's funding. EPA is considering a grant request for$500.000,with a decision due next month. Proposition 13 includes $38 million for the GWRS project. Both agencies' boards have adopted the Final EIR and the Bureau of Reclamation in May should finalize the EIS Record of Determination. The Ocean Discharge Brine Study will be done to accurately show the effects of reduced flow and higher mineral concentrations on outfall dispersion. General Manager Don McIntyre mentioned that the makeup of the Joint Coordinating Committee may be changed to appoint alternate Directors to each of the Committee members, rather than having the General Manager of each agency sit as alternate to the three Directors. The alternates will be encouraged to attend the meetings. ACTION ITEMS (Items a-i) a. PDC00-14 Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No.7-28, with Haden Grbavac Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$19,957, increasing the total contract amount to$211,561; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing the total contract amount to the final contract amount of$204,016; and (3)Accept RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. PDC Committee Minutes V Page 4 March 2, 2000 b. PDC00-15 Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1,with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$106,492 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,442,996. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve. C. PDC00-16 Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program,Job No. J-73-2. Jim Herberg reported that this project is a part of implementing recommendations from the Strategic Plan requiring action on reducing rainfall inflow and infiltration into the collection system. Most inflow is from small lines in local sewer systems. In the 1998-monitoring program, 60 sites were monitored in dry and wet weather. Several of the 'hot spots'identified through that program are now being corrected. The Cooperative Projects Program is one vehicle that can assist the cities in correcting problems that may be identified in the long-term sewer-monitoring program. The monitoring program will prioritize cooperative projects, replace planned monitoring and also result in better mapping of the collective system. Director Swan expressed concern about working on the whole collection system at one time. He suggested identifying the problems and making corrections section by section, completing one trunkline system before proceeding to the next. _ MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried (5-1 with Director Swan opposed)to recommend approval. d. PDCOO-17 (1) Establish a Budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; (2)Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station,Contract No. 5-50,for a total budget of$4,124,000; (3)Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14'Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total budget of$2.210,000; (4)Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the W Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total budget of$2,248,000; (5)Approve a budget amendment of($12,061,000)for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37,for a total budget of$14,284,200; and (6)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos. 5.49, 5.50, 5-51, and 5-52 for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801. y PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 March 2, 2000 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. e. PDC00-18 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not to exceed $175,261. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. f. PDC00-19 Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed $224,800. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. g. PDC00-20 Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No.7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41,for a total amount not to exceed $811,958. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. h. PDC00-21 Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering corporation,for Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, providing for additional engineering services,for an additional amount of$40,358, increasing the total amount not to exceed to$170,680. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly caned to approve. i. PDC00-02 Direct Staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex to replace the Foster Pump Station. Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor, provided additional information requested by the Committee at the February meeting, and clarified staffs recommendation. The existing function of the Foster Pump Station was explained, and limitations were detailed. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 March 2, 2000 (15) INFORMATION ITEM (a) a. PDC00-22 Receive and file a status report on Interim Administrative Control Plan for Hazardous Location Classification Project, Job No. J-35. Terri Josway, Safety Manager, reported that the highest hazardous areas have been identified. Procedures and training will be provided for staff and consultants working on site. Steve Kozak has reviewed the plan recommendations with the District's insurers. Proposals will be solicited for the implementation of the recommendations. The project has a $28 million budget. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (17) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (20) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 5 p.m. P' PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 March 2, 2000 (21) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Submitted by. J Tappan D Committee Secretary r:w.v.�.�oanmwoc�000uaiww�ecmwzao we�.ti�ures.ax PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dace ToBd ofO,. 3-2-Or n-2aol AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe Iem Non D 'o - rl e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, irector of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 7-28 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company authorizing an addition of$19,957, increasing the total contract amount to $211,561; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing the total contract amount to the final contract amount of$204,016; and (3)Accept RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company. SUMMARY Change Order No. 1 includes two items of added work and one item of deleted work to Contract No. 7-28. Change Order No. 2 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities to Contract No. 7-28. There are no errors associated with this change order. There is a 5 day time extension associated with Change Order No. 1. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date July 29, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date November 25, 1999 Total Number of Change Order to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date November 25, 1999 Actual Completion Date November 19, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 191,604.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (CO No. 1, Add) $ 19,957.00 This Change (CO No. 2, Deduct) $ (7,545.00) Change Orders To Date $ 12,412.00 Percent Increase To Date 6.48% Final Contract Price $ 204,016.00 G NWlobaWenda DnM1 RepoANO n]38 C01.W2 CIMMN33Yll.ed RM . �M8 Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT �v ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 1998-99 Budget Capital Projects Zone 7, Line i) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The contingency fund of the project budget will provide increased construction contract cost. Refer to the Budget Information Table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 7-28, RA 6"B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, includes installation of clay pipe and manholes, interception of laterals, and abandonment of existing sewers within the City of Tustin. DGA Consultants, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Mladen Grbavac Construction Company on May 26, 1999. The contract is 100% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 1: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Extra Paving and Latex Slurry Seal $8 545 0 Desi n Change 2 Traffic Loo Re lacement $ 1,000 0 Design Change 3 Undisclosed Utilities $12 412 1 5 1 Changed Condition TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $19,9571 5 Item No. 1 reflects paving adjustments required by the City. Cost along with a deduction as summarized in Change Order No. 2 combine to a net cost of$1,000 for this item. Item No. 3 compensates the contractor for standby time and extra work associated with utilities not shown on the contract drawings and not marked in the field. The following summarizes Change Order No.2: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities 1 $ 545 0 1 Other TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $ 7 545 0 This item adjusts the contract bid items to the actual quantities incorporated into the work. See attached Change Order No. 2 for more information. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption was filed on April 8, 1999. G:bt6bbaM endaG Rfp b L 7-U MI.M.WwRll]1W.dp "M.. a2G"° Page 2 4 v` ATTACHMENTS 4 Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 G 4A91oLVIVpentla DnM PepvMW�QFfl]]6 COt,CO],G�wG13GN.ON page 3 0.rnseE: 9/dIRB BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7-28 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 100% Design Staff $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 29,149 58% Consultant PSA $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 6,484 26% Construction Contract $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 4,016 $ 204,016 $ 191,604 $ 12,412 $ 204,016 $ 183,099 90% Construction(Other) $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,328 67% Construction Staff $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ - $ 49,000 $ 41,466 85% Contingency $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ (4,016) $ 58,984 $ 0% TOTAL $ 395.000 $ 395,000 $ - $ 395.000 $ 323.604 1 $ 12,412 1 $ 336.016 $ 266,526 79% 7-28 Budget Table CO 1,CO 2, Closeout CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7-28 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 07/29/1999 $ 191,604.00 $ 191,604.00 _ 120 120 CO NO, 1 Pending $ 19,957.00 $ 211,561.00 10,42% 5 125 CO NO, 2 1 Pending 1 $ (7,545.00)1 $ 204,016.00 6.48% 0 125 7-28 C01, CO2 chngstat report y Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Dale: January 24, 2000 RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28 Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Dedsst) $19,957.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —EXTRA PAVING AND LATEX SLURRY SEAL This item is for extra paving and the addition of latex to road slurry. The City of Tustin required additional paving on Mitchell Avenue in exchange for reduced pavement grinding in the Newport/Mitchell Avenue intersection. The City further required a latex addition to road slurry seal, which was not a contract requirement. Total costs for this item are reduced by$7,545 for reduction of pavement grinding quantities, as shown in Item No. 1 of attached Change Order No. 2. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (B)l and 2.a of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,545.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—TRAFFIC LOOP REPLACEMENT This item is for deleted traffic loop replacement work in the NewporUMitchell Avenue intersection. The work was deleted from the contract because the City of Tustin elected to replace traffic loops at a later time under a separate City contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (B)l and 2.a of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($1,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3— UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES This item is for delays and extra work associated with undisclosed telephone and waterlines, and incorrectly shown sewer house connections. The Contractor damaged telephone lines in the Newport/Mitchell Avenue intersection and a waterline on Mitchell Avenue. The lines were not shown on the contract drawings and not marked in the field. The repair of these lines, which was done by the Utilities with Contractor help, delayed critical path contract work. Locations of sewer house connections on "B" Street from Station 6+15 to Station 6+45 were incorrectly shown on the drawings. The extra work consisted of exploratory excavations to locale the pipes. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (B)1 and 2.a of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,412.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Date: January 24, 2000 RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28 Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc. TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $19,957.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 5 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 5 day extension of time is required for this change order, and that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 29, 1999 Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 25, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 5 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 5 Calendar Days - - Revised Contract Time: 125 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 30, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None Actual Final Completion Date: November 19, 1999 Original Contract Price $ 191,604.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 19,957.00 Amended Contract Price $ 211,561.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mladen Grbavac Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Date: January 24 2000 RA 6 "S" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28 Consultant: DGA Consultants, Inc. Board Authorization Date: March 22, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MLADEN GRBAVAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Contractor Date \Ydonws iMp.dt ngVOBS 8 CONTRACTSV-28\Constn ionM gement\CO t\C0728-01.d PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dare To Bd.MDir. 03/02/00 03/22/00 AGENDA REPORT I paugmo e6 Item NIN um Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David L , Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: LONG-TERM SEWER MONITORING PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a Long-Term Sewer Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2. SUMMARY The District is beginning an aggressive campaign to reduce rain dependant inflow and infiltration (RDII) as part of the implementation of the District's Strategic Plan. The goal of the RDII element in the Strategic Plan is to reduce wet weather peaking at the District's two wastewater treatment facilities by 20%. In conjunction with the Cooperative Projects Program, Staff is proposing the implementation of a long-term sewer monitoring program. The long-term sewer monitoring program will help the District to accomplish the following: • Prioritize RDII Sites and Projects • Monitor Effectiveness of RDII Projects • Gauge Effectiveness of Overall Cooperative Projects Program • Establish Point of Diminishing Return of the Cooperative Projects Program • Reduce the Need for Temporary Monitoring Activities Throughout OCSD The total cost estimate over the next ten years is $5,000,000. The cost estimate includes $3,000,000 to establish a network of approximately 170 flow meters. The estimate also includes$2,000,000 to maintain the meters and analyze flow data over the next ten years. This project has been reviewed by the Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee and was recommended to be reviewed by the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee (PDC). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost estimate includes $3,000,000 to establish the program and install flow meters. The estimate also includes $2,000,000 to maintain the meters and analyze flow data over the next ten years. The total estimate for outside services is $5,000,000 over the next ten years and would be funded from Job No. J-73. aw.. MM Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT i ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) The $5,000,000 is included in the CORF budget under Job. No. J-73. The total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is $149,990,000, and will be spent over the next twenty years on projects reducing and identifying RDII throughout the District. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attached Staff Report ALTERNATIVES Do not implement permanent long-term monitoring at this time. This alternative will not avoid up to $4.3 million in required temporary monitoring activities over the next ten years. This will also limit the District's ability to monitor the effectiveness of the Cooperative Projects Program. The District will not be able to identify the largest and most significant sources of RDII, or identify the point of diminishing return for the program. Finally, the no- action alternative can hinder RDII reduction and cause capital and operational costs avoided in the Strategic Plan. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report JDH:JB:jak GWglobaMgenda Draft RepoftTDCV-734 AR 030200.d. Page 2 V b , a 1 February 9, 2000 STAFF REPORT Proposed Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program Strategic Plan Findings and the Cooperative Projects Program The Strategic Plan concluded that flow capacity improvements, including a costly new outfall, can be avoided by implementing a program to reduce rain dependant inflow and infiltration (RDII) in the local agencies' collection systems. Currently, a wet weather peak of 2.2 times the average daily flow occurs at the plants during storm events, primarily due to RDII. According to District historical records, this peak flow has increased from 1.8 to 2.2 times average daily flow over the past 20 years. This increasing trend will continue over time if a RDII control program is not actively pursued. In response to this finding, the District has initiated the Cooperative Projects Program. The Cooperative Projects Program is an incentive program to encourage local agencies to find and eliminate all forms of unwanted inflow including RDII. Program funding by the District, includes subsidies of up to 50% of the project's costs for local agencies that meet the District's program requirements. Total Cooperative Projects Program funding is budgeted at$149,990,000 over the next 20 years. As part of the Cooperative Projects Program, investigations are being conducted in areas with elevated RDII. These investigations are focusing on characterizing defects found during the preparation of the Strategic Plan and will be completed in June 2000. These studies will help the District to understand the complexity of investigating and eliminating RDII and help direct future RDII investigations. In conjunction with the Cooperative Projects Program, the District's O&M department has established a manhole plugging/sealing program for agencies with areas subject to flooding. Need for a Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program The District has taken several least cost measures to identify and reduce RDII. The District supplies local agencies with manhole plugs and sealant for manhole covers subject to flooding. Possible sources of RDII causing wet weather peaking are discussed in the Strategic Plan include: manhole lids; roof drains; high groundwater levels; and other sources for reference. The Cooperative Projects Program has been established to sponsor local agency projects. In addition, the District conducts temporary flow monitoring activities in the local agency collection system when necessary for District studies. oDSD - P.D.Sox 912] 3 Fount M VWIW.CA 92728-9127 - (714)982-2411 Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program Page 2 / February 9, 2000 Y However, only a handful of agencies have taken advantage of the manhole plugging/sealing program. It was infeasible for the Strategic Plan to identify where RDII is prevalent throughout the District. Although, temporary monitoring during the preparation of the Strategic Plan did identify four areas with peaking factors as high as 5.0. And, three are being investigated as RDII "hot spots." After reviewing the response to the Manhole plugging program, the condition of the local agencies sewer maps, the data regarding areas subject to flooding, and the projects generated during from the Cooperative Projects Program, it was determined that it will be difficult to implement any RDII mitigation program without a flow monitoring program. This is because local agency funding is scarce limiting participation in most District programs. Thus, large potential sources of RDII still need to be located and prioritized. And, at this rate of RDII reduction, after 20 years, the District will fall short of its goal. Long-term Sewer Monitoring Program Outline The Concept of a long-term sewer monitoring program was presented to the District's Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee in August 1999. A monitoring program was included with a presentation on the findings of the temporary monitoring program performed during the preparation of the Strategic Plan. The long-term sewer monitoring program includes an estimated 167 permanent and up to 250 temporary flow meters throughout the collection system. Local agencies typically conduct, short-term, investigations during the preparation of sewer master plans and sewer deficiency studies. These investigations are used to calibrate wastewater flow models. For example, during the preparation of the City of Seal Beach's Sewer Master Plan, three monitoring locations were selected. The City of Brea is planning for approximately 10 temporary monitoring locations. These efforts are good starting points and can identify if RDII exists for the larger areas or portion of the agencies. Follow-up monitoring for smaller areas within the agencies problematic areas can then determine specific RDII sources. An effective monitoring program needs to involve converting local agency sewer maps to an electronic format. Then, using the developed map(s), key monitoring locations for flow meters throughout the District could effectively be placed. Key locations would include a combination of drainage basin confluence points, prime locations within the District's trunks, and unmetered drainage crossing Revenue Area boundaries. Two effective programs have been developed to identify RDII. The first is a two-year effort using approximately 1200 temporary monitors, 1 meter for every 30,000 linear feet of sewer throughout the District. The second involves a long-term metering program that identifies RDII in larger areas and leads to temporary monitoring in problematic areas. The long-term program includes approximately 150 to 200 meters for optimum results. The goal of the long-term sewer monitoring program will be to divide the District into segments, each with approximately 150,000 linear feet of sewer pipe. In subsequent program years, temporary flow monitors will be used to pinpoint sources of RDII in areas with significant levels of RDII, and to work with local agencies to mitigate the RDII. Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program Page 3 •� February 9, 2000 The long-term program is recommended and is the least cost alternative of the two. The program also provides the most comprehensive data set, and can be used to replace several planned temporary monitoring efforts. Program Benchmarking In order to establish an effective monitoring program, several agencies throughout the U.S. were contacted that are conducting similar peak flow reduction and long-term sewer monitoring programs. Table 1 contains a list of the agencies conducting peak flow management programs. As shown in Table 1, many of the agencies are conducting their programs because of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) litigation over combined sewer overflows (CSO) and sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The other large category on Table 1 includes agencies that use permanent flow meters to bill customers. However, there are a number of agencies that conduct programs solely to manage peak flow similar to the District's proposed program. These agencies are Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), Kings County Washington (KCW), City of Indianapolis, and Washington D.C. They are actively monitoring to understand system capacity, controlling RDII, and avoiding costly sewer capacity projects. Table 2 contains details for the agency program listed in Table 1 if their programs are used to eliminate RDII. These agencies vary greatly is size. Thus, the information was converted to figures that can be compared. The "Comparative Service Area Features" column contains service area characteristics per meter. The proposed District program compares well with the other agencies' programs. In fact, six of the ten agencies are conducting more aggressive monitoring programs than the proposed District program. Finally, Table 2 identifies also the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) recommended monitoring program parameters. Program Cost-Benefit The estimated cost of an effective long-term sewer monitoring program is approximately $5 million dollars over the next ten years. This is based on other agency experience and published metering data. That includes $3 million for converting local agency sewer maps to an electronic format, selecting key monitoring locations, and the installation of approximately 170 meters. The remaining $2 million is for maintaining the meters and analyzing the monitoring data over the ten-year period. The costs for a long-term sewer monitoring program cannot be analyzed using the District's traditional rate-of-return, or payback period methodology. However, the program costs can be analyzed looking at the avoided costs for future monitoring activities and other intangible benefits. The estimated avoided cost for future monitoring activities, over the next ten years, is estimated at up to $4.3 million. This is based on the following assumptions: Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program Page 4 February 9, 2000 (� • The estimated cost for placing, maintaining, and analyzing data of a temporary meter is $5000. • The following monitoring activities will occur without permanent monitors in the sewer system: - Each of the approved Cooperative Program projects will require pre and post- monitoring. This involves 10 projects per year for 10 years, or 100 projects, totaling $1,000,000 in monitoring. - Each agency will prepare a Sewer Master Plan, or a Sewer Master Plan update, every five years. Each agency effort will involve-at least 5 metering locations that would have contained a permanent meter. This involves 23 agencies with 2 projects over the next 10 years and includes 5 metering locations totaling $1,150,000. - Each agency will prepare electronic maps for the area. The proposed District program could avoid duplicated administrative costs associated with hiring and administrating a consulting contract. This is estimated at$1,000 per agency that does not have electronic mapping today, or$20,000. The District is planning approximately 50 sewer relief projects during the next 10 years. These projects generally involve pre and post-monitoring. This will equate to an estimated $500,000 in flow monitoring over the next 10 years. - The District will update its Master Plan or its Strategic Plan in 5 to 10 years. This effort will require a flow monitoring effort similar to the recent Strategic Plan. This equates to approximately$400,000 in monitoring. - The District currently installs temporary monitors for maintenance reasons and by request of the Engineering Department. Up to 2 temporary meters are placed per month. At this rate, over the next 10 years, this would equal $1,200,000. The intangible benefits to the program include: • The District could better monitor the progress of the RDII elimination program. This includes RDII reduction, aimed at reducing peak wet weather flows to the treatment plants by 20%. • The District could better monitor the timing of its sewer repair and replacement program totaling $221,000,000 over the next 20 years. • The District could better monitor the condition of the sewer system and preventively maintain the sewer system—reduce potential for catastrophic failures. • The District could use the monitors to supervise operations during storm events. Proposed Long-term Monitoring Program Page 5 a February 9, 2000 • The District could monitor areas as they age and determine if inflow and infiltration is increasing. • The District could monitor and mitigate unusual, but reoccurring, activities in the sewer system. Conclusion and Recommendation Long-term sewer monitoring programs can be effective in identifying RDII based on other agency's experience. In the District's case, a long-term sewer monitoring program will aid in administering its $149,990,000 Cooperative Projects Program. The recommended program, as shown in Table 2, compares well with established monitoring programs and should be an effective tool. In particular, this tool will allow the District to monitor progress of RDII and peak flow reductions, establish a point of diminishing return for the entire Cooperative Projects Program, and allow bettering monitoring of flow within the Revenue Districts. The program can also replace a number of planned temporary monitoring activities. Thus, the program's costs can be offset by up to 80%. Therefore, it is recommended that the long-term sewer monitoring program be implemented. JB.,jak H:WpAtakigVOBS&CONTRACTSV-73-2%Staff Report for ARAae PDC COMMITTEE MeetingDMe Toee.ofoar. 312/00 3/22/00 AGENDA REPORT P I mNumber Item unbpr Cno-17 Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Lu , irector of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-49 REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-50 REHABILITATION OF THE 14TM STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-51 REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-52 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS & REHABILITATION TO OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 2-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; (2) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, for a total budget of$4,124,000; (3) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 14m Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, for a total budget of$2,210,000; (4) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, for a total budget of$2,248,000; (5)Approve a budget amendment of($12,061,000)for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for a total budget of$14,284,200; and (6)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos. 5-49, 5-50, 5-51 and 5-52, for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801. SUMMARY The District's 1989 Master Plan outlined reliability criteria for modifications and future designs of the outlying pump stations. The Master Plan also recommended improvements to the pump stations to meet the criteria outlined. In 1999, MacDonald-Stephens Engineering (MSE) completed an assessment of 17 of the District's outlying pump stations and two of the District's outlying meter stations as part of Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37. The assessment included the reliability criteria set forth in the 1989 Master Plan as well as evaluations of electrical area \4vp0n 4iN NNOdMpdnddD ft Reymrwo 9M0303WAM Page 1 1 I classification, safety code compliance, on-site power generation, corrosion status, mechanical and seismic conditions, and hydraulic capacity to meet the District's 1999 Strategic Plan projected for peak flows for each facility. The resulting report documents the mechanical, electrical, structural, seismic and safety deficiencies, and recommends improvements to each facility in meeting national and state code and current District standards. Cost estimates for each were also included. The extent of the modifications and improvements to each facility warrants a separate construction project for each of the pump stations. The engineering design for these improvements can be grouped together for similar construction projects. Staff recommends the following pump stations, all located in the City of Newport Beach, be grouped together for the first Professional Services Agreement(PSA): Bitter Point Pump Station Replacement Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement 14"' Street Pump Station Rehabilitation "A" Street Pump Station Rehabilitation The PSA includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report, Construction Documents, and Construction Support Services for bidding and construction of each of the four pump stations. Tasks include but are not limited to siting studies, hydraulic analysis of the force main network, CEQA & EIR documentation, plans and specifications, geotechnical investigation, surveying, permit and property acquisition services, and cost estimates. Staff received proposals from four firms: Boyle Engineering Corp.; Lee & Ro Engineering, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers/ RW Beck, Inc.; and Malcom Pimie, Inc. Staff recommends approval of a PSA for the design and construction support services for the four pump stations with Lee & Ro, Inc.,for an amount not to exceed $1,149,801. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, excluding funds required for additional property acquisition, is $3,479,000. Costs are to be split 75% to Revenue Area 5 and 25% to Revenue Area 6. The total budget estimate for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, excluding funds required for additional property acquisition, is $4,124,000. Costs are to be split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25% to Revenue Area 6. O[ot&baa t N,ymuNppiga pad geNrlT➢pL W 9 M 0]03CO.Ez Page 2 y The total budget for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, is $2,210,000, all costs directed to Revenue Area 5. The total budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A"Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, is $2,248,000, all costs directed to Revenue Area 5. The total budget for the original project, Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, is reduced by $12,061,000 to $14,284,200. See attached Budget Information Tables for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This 'item has been budgeted. (Line item:As noted below) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Contract Nos. 5-49, 5-50, 5-51, and 5-52, are within the Scope of Work of the original Contract No. 2-37, Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations in the current CIP Budget. Contract No. 2-37 funds have been allocated to the various revenue areas, in proportion to the flow from each revenue area. (Reference 1999-00 Budget, Revenue Area 2, page 26, Revenue Area 3, page 32, Revenue Area 5, page 38, Revenue Area 6, page 42, Revenue Area 7, page 44, and Revenue Area 11, page 61). Staff requests the reallocation of funds from Contract No. 2-37's budget be based on specific facility requirements and reassigned to individual facility contracts as required. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pump Station Backoround Bitter Point and Rocky Point pump stations were built in the late 1930s for the City of Newport Beach and last upgraded in 1992. The upgrades replaced existing wom-out pumps (Bitter Point only) and motors and out of date variable frequency drives and controls with new units that met 1992 codes and District standards. The pump stations are located in Revenue Area 5, but service flows from both Revenue Areas 5 and 6. Each station pumps into a force main network system that discharges into the District's Wastewater Plant No. 2. Bitter Point Pump Station is located at 5800 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach at the entrance the Armstrong Petroleum Oilfield. Rocky Point Pump Station is located at 1221 Coast Highway, Newport Beach within the confines of the Balboa Bay Club. \Y�elYCa9f YrgtGN..p8ui 0i2fl F4 6\PK1S<9AR0.WMOC[ Page 3 a The 140 Street and "A" Street pump stations were built in the late 1940s for the City of Newport Beach and were last upgraded in 1972. Both pump stations are located in Revenue Area 5. The 14" Street Pump Station is located at 1400 Balboa Blvd., Newport Beach at Balboa Blvd. and 10 Street. The 10 Street Pump Station pumps into the collection system that discharges into the District's Lido Pump Station. Lido Pump Station pumps into same force main network as Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations. The "A" Street Pump Station is located on Balboa Blvd. in Newport Beach at Balboa Blvd. and "A" Street. "A" Pump Station pumps into the collection system that discharges into the 14" Street Pump Station. Each of the four pump stations has numerous mechanical, electrical, structural, seismic and safety deficiencies in meeting current national and state codes and current District standards. Thus the pump stations require replacement and/or rehabilitation. Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations are also inadequate in size to accommodate the equipment necessary to bring the stations up to code or meet the OCSD 1999 Strategic Plan's projected flows or to accommodate standby power facilities. Pr000sal Evaluation The proposals were evaluated in accordance with District policy. Lee & Ro, Inc. was the highest ranked consultant. Their proposal provided insight to all key issues. The proposal ranked first in nearly every category, (project approach and understanding of the Scope of Work, managing and performing the work, applicable related project experience, and applicable staff qualifications). Lee & Ro Inc.'s fee proposal was the second lowest, with only the third ranked consultant, Malcom Pimie, Inc., providing a lower fee. However, Lee & Ro's proposal rating was significantly higher than Malcom Pimie. The proposed fee from the second ranked consultant, MSE Engineers / RW Beck, was significantly higher than the fee proposed by Lee & Ro, Inc. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. 2. A PSA for the design and construction support services for each of the four pump stations could be awarded to one or more engineering firths. The choice to award individual PSAs would result in a higher fee, possible duplication of work at a cost to the products the District is to receive. ,mwrvamn o�wxm"aen aw�swoos-esna oxzoo.aa Page 4 ti CEQA FINDINGS The rehabilitation of the outlying pump stations is addressed in the 1999 Strategic Plan / EIR. Several but not all of the pump stations were individually addressed. CEQA/EIR requirements will be evaluated and addressed by the District's consultant, K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. Lee & Ro, Inc. will provide support to K.P. Lindstrom under this PSA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-49) 2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-50) 3. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-51) 4. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-52) 5. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 2-37) 6. Budget Summary Table (Outlying Pump Station Projects By Revenue Area) WDC.jak:jo:jak PmCalMelalNl ApmOe Oren Repvb`POL gM U�.Ex Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5.49e ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development E 35,OD0 f 35.000 E 35,000 S 35.000 0% Design Staff S 139.000 f 139.000 $ 139.000 E 139,000 0% Cwwllant PSA S 418.000 f 418,000 $ 324.537 S 324.537 0% Construction Contract $ 1916,000 E 1B16,000 b Construction Other) E 36.000 S 36.000 E Construction Staff $ 355,000 $ 355.000 E Conti $ 580,000 f 580,000 E TOTAL f E 3,479.000 f 3,479,000 E - f 498,537 S 499537 f 0% Costs associated with the Bitter Point Pump Station are split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25%to Revenue Area 6. R",ftWVU003 aC ACTS a PI.PS45J99ueael Te W-]q - BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50' ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development E 41.000 $ 41,000 $ 41.000 $ 41,000 0% Design Staff E 165.000 E 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 165,0D0 0% Consultant PSA $ 496,000 $ 496.000 $ 3444679 $ 344,679 0% Construction Contract $ 2.273,DOD $ 2.273,0DO E Construction(Other) $ 41,000 $ 41,000 g Construction Staff $ 420,000 S 420,000 $ Contingency $ 688.000 $ SBB.000 $ TOTAL $ - s - $ 4,124,D00 $ 4,124,000 $ - E 550,679 $ 550,679 $ 0% Costs associated with the Rocky Point Pump Station are split 75%to Revenue Area 5 and 25%to Revenue Area 5. H M .dt.k,g OBS a CONTRACTS45.50 Rocky PI.P311550 Budeei T.W.W.IDlnrlp. BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE 14TH STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO, 5-51 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project DevebpvM $ 22.000 $ 22,000 S 22,000 $ 22,0D0 0% Design StaO $ 88.000 S 88,wo $ 88,000 $ 88,000 0% Consuftat8 PSA $ 266,0D0 $ 266,000 $ 242.795 S 242,795 0% Construction Contract $ 1,217,000 $ 1.217,000 $ Conatruction(DOW) S 22,000 S 22.000 S Construction Staff S 226.DW $ 226,000 S Conlingency S 369.000 $ 369.000 $ TOTAL S - S - f 2,210,OW S 2,210,000 " f - f 352,795 $ 352,795 $ 0% X hx eblawnglIOBS a CCNIRAGT -51141E M PSNS 51 Budget Table HsjDatnM BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATIOPN OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-52 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Proje Development S 23.000 $ 23,000 <_ 23.000 S 23,000 0% Design Staff E 90,000 E 90.000 E 90.000 E 90.000 0% Consollarrt PSA E 270.000 $ 270,000 S 237,790 $ 237.790 0% Construction Contact $ 1 238.0DD $ 1.238.000 S Construction(Og r) $ 22,DD0 $ 22,000 $ ConsWction Staff E 230,000 $ 230.000 $ Contingemy E 375.DD0 E 375,000 S TOTAL E - S - S 2,248,000 S 2248.000 5 - S 350.790 1 S 350,790 $ 0% H%w &abngW aCOR ACTSL-52 A St PSIS-528WgM Table Ws]Dsincts BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS & REHABILITATION TO OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS CONTRACT NO. 2.37• ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 26,550 $ 175,500 $ 121,C00) S 54.500 $ 175.000 $ 175,000 $ 27.292 16% Design Staff $ 137,500 $ 908,500 $ 462,000) $ 426.500 S 908.500 $ 908.500 $ 402,028 44% Consultant PSA $ 357,500 $ 2,361,400 E 1n5Q000) $ 911.400 $ 631,000 $ 531,000 $ 531,000 100% RC.n.�.ftnract $ 2,372,000 $ 15,678.700 E 6,644,1700 $ 9.034.700 S $ - $ er) $ 89,400 S 590,900 $ I ' 121,000 $ 469.900 S $ - $ $ 360,750 $ 2,384.500 8 1,231,000 $ 1.153,500 $ $ 642,300 $ 4,245.700 $ 2.012,000) $ 2.233,700 $ $ 3.986,000 $ 26,345,200 $ (12,061 000) $ 14,284,200 $ 1,614,500 $ - $ 1,614,500 $ 960.320 59% Cost associated with Contract No. 2-37 have been split as follows: 10%to Revenue Area 2 06%to Revenue Area 6 14%to Revenue Area 3 33%to Revenue Area 7 28%to Revenue Area 5 09%to Revenue Area 11 H1wp.ala engUOBs&CONTRACM5 49 Bitter PI.PSg237 ReNeed Budget Table AslCutncts BUDGET SUMMARY TABLE OUTLYING PUMP STATION PROJECTS BY REVENUE AREA Revenue Area 2 3 5 e 7 11 14 Totals Contract 2-37 Current 99-00 $2,634,600 $3688,300 $7378.700 $1580,700 $8,893900 $2.371,000 1 $26.345,200 reposed Re-allocation 99-0B $1,208,137 111,638,527 $3,377,100 $723855 $3980123 $1,085,458 $12.081000 Contract 2-37 Revised 99-00 $1,428,420 $1,999.788 $3.999.578 $857,052 $4,713,7861 $1,285.578 1 1 $14.284.200 Revenue Area 2 3 5 1 8 1 7 1 11 14 Totals Proposed 99-00 Budget Additions Contract 5-49 Bitter Pt,Pump Station' $2.609,250 $869.750 $3,479 000 Contract 5.50 Rocky PI.Pump Station' $3,093 000 $1,031,000 $4,124.000 Contract 5-51 14it1 St.Pump Station $2210,000 $2,210 000 Contract 5-52 •A' $2 248,000 $2,248.000 Subtotal $10,160,250 $1.900.750 $12,061,000 Future Budget Items 00.01•• Contract 2-37 Miscall. Improvements $120,000 $168,000 $336000 $72.000 $396.000 $108000 1 $1.200,000 Contract 3.51 Seal Beach Pump Station $3,227.000 $3,227,000 Contract 3-52 Westlde Pump Station $1,619,000 $1619.000 Contract 5.63 Bay Bridge Pum Station $10393130 $54,700 $1,094000 Contract 5-54 Crystal Cove Pump Station $306.ODO $306 000 Contract 7-47 College Ave.Pump Station $247 850 $4 709 150 $4,957 000 Contract 7.48 Main St.Pump Station $78 400 $201 600 $280.000 Contract 7-49 MacAnnur Pump Station I $1,354,000 1 $1354.000 Contract 11-28 Edinger Pump Station $1 $1,518000 Slater PumpStation $22.400 ;$1,4743.600 $140.000 Green River Meter Station $225,000 $225 000 Mal St.Meter Station $52.000 $52000 Subtotal $345,000 $5,036,400 $1,681,30D $319,850 $6.589,550 ;$25.6,300 $15,972,000Total•" $345,000 $5,036,400 $11,B41,550 $2.220,600 $6,589.550 $28.033,000 Excludes funds required for additional properly acquisition. Preliminary budget figures •••Allocation of funds based on facility requirements by Revenue Area H Mp.dueeipUOB&&CONTRACTS 19 Behr R PS12.37 Budget Table by Reronue lvess.alsl&heen PDC COMMITTEE mesa 9Date TOBO.or Dlr s-2-m 3-zz-oo AGENDA REPORT Item Number omN PDCuc-Ifl Orange County Sanitadon Dis - FROM: David Ludwi , Director of Engineering Originator: Mark A. Tomko, Project Manager SUBJECT: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not to exceed $175,261. SUMMARY The Sunflower Trunk Sewer, located primarily in the Sunflower Avenue right of way in the cities of Fountain Valley, Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, was built in three phases in 1971 and 1972. The sewer is comprised of plastic (PVC) lined reinforced concrete pipe ranging from 84 to 54 inches in diameter and an approximate length of 5.3 miles. In August 1999, DGA Consultants, Inc., completed a project report identifying significant pipeline and manhole defects and recommending rehabilitation work. In accordance with District policy, Staff has solicited proposals for the design of the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Trunk Sewer and Manholes. The following three firms submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: (1)AKM Consulting Engineers; (2) DGA Consultants, Inc.; and (3)Tran Consulting Engineers. Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement(PSA)with Train Consulting Engineers, for an amount not to exceed $175,261. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. Project development costs are estimated to increase by $2,000. Design staff costs are estimated to decrease by$71,774. The PSA's for this job are divided into two separate PSA's. PSA 1 was a design study. PSA 2 is this PSA for the final design and construction support. PSA 2 costs are estimated to increase by$75,000. This is offset by the $71,774 decrease in Design staff costs. efpe8 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT } ® This Rem has been budgeted. (Line item: Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21). ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Funds were moved in the budget table between project tasks to cover past and anticipated expenditures with no change to the total project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Sunflower Trunk Sewer was constructed in three phases in 1971 and 1972, and runs from McGaw Avenue and Redhill in Irvine to Plant No. 1. The 1989 Master Plan recommended that rehabilitation of aging interceptor sewers be part of the District's on- going program of repairing and lining previously unlined and unprotected sewer and manhole structures. DGA Consultants, Inc. investigated the pipeline by conducting a closed circuit television inspection in June 1999. The preliminary report identified the most significant pipeline defects as mineral deposits, grease buildup, minor weld separation, and debris at the top of the pipe. The report recommended that the sewer be rehabilitated by: • Cleaning • Diversion and removal of mineral deposits • Testing the entire pipe liner and PVC welds • Spot repairs of defects discovered by testing DGA Consultants, Inc. conducted man entry inspections to inspect the manholes. The inspectors identified that most of the existing manholes have flat roofs and are in need of rehabilitation. The preliminary project report recommended that the manholes be repaired and rehabilitated by: • Cleaning and lining the vaults • Removing vault roofs and replacing with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) lined cones • Installing a PVC liner on the existing vault walls • Repairing damaged shelf lining • Installing gas flaps Proposal Evaluation Of the three firms submitting proposals, AKM Consulting Engineers had the highest ranking based on their project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, and their plan for managing and performing the work. Tran Consulting Engineers had the second highest ranked proposal and the lowest fee, which was approximately half of AKM "^e°°: earvoe Page 2 V Consulting Engineer's proposed fee. Tran Consulting Engineer's proposal did not contain the level of detail as AKM Consulting Engineers but did confirm an understanding of the job and proposed innovative ideas for rehabilitating the sewer line and manholes. Tran Consulting Engineers has experience on similar jobs, and has worked successfully on other projects with the District. Tran Consulting Engineers proposed subconsultants for geotechnical services, environmental issues, and traffic control included professionals that have experience on other jobs within the project area. See the attached Staff Evaluation of the Proposals for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan and Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Completion was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table MAT:jo Jak G:l tglobal\Agenda Deft ReportslPDW-21 AR 030200.dot aee: Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation Contract No. 7.21 i ? 'OIt1< " °< Iy3EF7T a PRiS a1 d@eSED� PRT/P�OSED - D ESTINfATED( I E0, 18 SED' :Ae I4AU ,{ate-' r T�7'�- COIIfir�TP. .4 ` •S' '� uN1l 11 .GE7! INC U � � $ 1d r Mh REDUE a xr;- H(`)ROA710N i t'_ 0 QATE(%) St Project Dovelopamt $ 18.000 $ 17,000 $ 2,000 $ 19.000 $ 17,000 $ 2,000 $ 19,000 $ 18.216 107% Desi nStaff $ 88.000 $ 264.400 1$ 71.774 $ 192,626 $ 264,400 $ 1,774 $ 192,626 $ 2.086 1% Consultant PSA 1 $ 90.000 $ 90,000 8 5226 $ 84,774 - $ 84,774 $ - $ 84,774 $ 79,688 89% Comultant PSA 2 $ - $ 125,000 $ 75,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 175261 $ 175,261 0% Constriction Contract $ 3.511,025 $ 3,511.025 $ - $ 3,511,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 442 0% Construction other $ - $ - $ 8 - E . $ - $ Comtruc8on Staff $ 474,626 $ 482,300 $ - $ 482,300 $ - $ - $ . $ 0% contingency $ 897,898 $ 897,898 $ - $ 897,898 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL 8 5,079,549 $ 6.387,623 $ - $ 5,387.623 $ 366.174 $ 105,487 $ 471.661 $ 10D,432 2% (1)denotes DGA Consultants Inc. (2)denotes Tran Consulting Engineers Kb,dww.,uoss WWRA S%7-2117-21 Mi99a1 IntoW PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To E%0f Dir. 3-02-00 3-22_0 AGENDA REPORT tMn Nom ril? Ran Num Orange County Sanitation CqT FROM: David L7nDirector of Engineering Originator: Jeffrey D. Kidd, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total amount not to exceed $224,800. SUMMARY This project consists of two sewer reaches that require improvements to address existing and future deficiencies, primarily due to the proposed Boise Chica development located south of Warner Avenue and west of Boise Chica Street. The first reach is located in Warner Avenue in Huntington Beach. The second reach is located in Los Patos Avenue, Boise Chica Street and Warner Avenue. The two reaches are approximately 1.75 miles in combined length. The Strategic Plan identified these two reaches of the Warner Avenue Sewer to be hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) includes a utility search, geotechnical investigation, flow monitoring, Preliminary Design Report (PDR), aerial and field surveying, permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, construction cost estimates, and construction support services. Three firths submitted proposals on January 11, 2000: ASL Consulting Engineers, Daniel Boyle Engineering, Inc., and Black & Veatch. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was also sent to Psomas Engineers, but they declined to submit a proposal. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with ASL Consulting Engineers, for an amount not to exceed $224,800. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. Project development costs are estimated to increase by$9,800. The Consultant Professional Services Agreement casts are estimated to increase by $35,000. All of this will be offset in the budget by drawing down the contingency by$44,800, leaving the overall budget total the same. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item:Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22). ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) GNgIMMpsW OM awnwontt-n ut awmona nm..a: ermne Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Of the three proposals submitted, ASL Consulting Engineers had a much higher ranked , proposal based on the high level of detail in their project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, and their plan for managing and performing the work. Daniel Boyle Engineering, Inc. had the second highest ranked proposal and the lowest fee. Daniel Boyle's proposal did not contain the level of detail presented in ASL's proposal, and did not contain the level of preliminary engineering effort included in the ASL proposal. Other factors unique to the ASL proposal included: an evaluation consisting of several weighing factors and criteria for determination of the optimum design; lesser use of subconsultants; recent project coordination experience (permitting, plan checking, etc.)with the City of Huntington Beach; and more sewer related experience. See attached Staff Evaluation of the proposals. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQAA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999 and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The Consultant will determine if supplemental environmental work will be required for this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table JDK:jak GAnlglobaMgmtla Drea RepoftXPDM11.22 AR 030200Aoo ft'.. Md"d Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Contract No. 11-22 1" •' rIORIflIN I �OP9B r PO FU r+ a £"IhROPp$�o .ESTIINAIIND IINATFD P UO I1TiiOR��.5y�, P �t1 Db'Eh° a tpU TIONr v T - EXPENDILUR'Ir PEADrd" >: 3 BUDGEh' -, `1 2I I�REA 1 TdibA nP; �� r.T - U1'HO�TION TO[IAYE f ATE(N.f: Project Development $ 10.200 $ 10,200 $ 9,800 $ 20,000 $ 10,200 $ 9,800 $ 20.000 $ 17,000 85% Design Staff I $ 176.400 $ 176400 $ 176,400 $ 176,400 $ 176,400 $ 0% Consultant PSA $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 35,000 $ 250,000 1 1 $ 224,800 $ 224,800 $ 0% Construction Contract $ 2,160,500 $ 2,180,500 $ 2.160,500 $ $ Construction Other $ $ - $ Construction Staff $ 536,100 $ 536,100 $ 536,100 $ - $ Contingency $ 929,500 $ 929500 $ 44,800 $ 884,700 Is, - is TOTAL $ 4,027,700 $ 4,027,700 $ $ 4,027.700 $ 186,600 $ 234,600 $ 421.200 $ 17,000 4% H9wp.Cla)engU0BS 8 CONTRACTSM-22 Wamer Ave.Relief Sewegfl l-22 Budget Info TableAslmstdcls PDC COMMITTEE ReennyDace ToaG.afDir. �aoD 3.2= AGENDA REPORT Item mrntw Item ryug PDCDn-de Cil Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Lu , irector of Engineering Originator. Kelly Nakaya, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS REACH A, CONTRACT NO. 7-36; ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 7-39; GISLER-REDHILL/NORTH TRUNK SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 7-41 GENERAL MANAGERS RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958. SUMMARY The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Reach A, Orange Trunk, and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk in the City of Tustin, to be hydraulically deficient. This combined project will replace approximately 40,000 feet of sewer pipe to alleviate the deficiencies. The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), utility research, geotechnical investigation, aerial and field surveying, permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support services for each individual contract. Three fines submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: AKM Consulting Engineers, Boyle Engineering Corporation, and URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with AKM Consulting Engineers, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. See the attached Budget Information Tables for more information. The total combined project budget is $13,672,300. BUDGETIMPACT E This item has been budgeted. (One item: RA 7, Summary of Capital Requirements) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) GMp kfteMed RWya 7�,7. .7J7 M1 O]Vlo RM emus Page 1 The funds for this project are from the Revenue Area No. 7 Capital Improvement Budget a under three separate Contract Nos. 7-36, 7-39, and 7-41. A budget breakdown is Included in the attached Budget Information Tables for these three contracts. For Contract No. 7-39 and Contract No. 7-41, Staff requests that a budget increase for Project Development and Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) be taken from the Contingency, with no change to the overall total project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Backaround The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Reach A, Orange Trunk, and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk to be hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. The purpose of this project is to provide consulting services to implement the replacement of approximately 40,000 feet of trunk sewers. Project Scope This PSA includes preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) and construction documents for the three individual contracts. Elements of the PSA include: • Preparation of a Preliminary Design Report • Geotechnical investigation • Utility research • Aerial and field surveying • Potholing of existing facilities • Permit acquisition • Design work, including preparation of final construction documents • Construction support services Proposal Evaluation Four engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. Three fines submitted proposals on December 21, 1999: AKM Consulting Engineers, Boyle Engineering Corporation, and URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. The proposals were evaluated and all three teams were Interviewed on January 12, 2000. AKM Consulting Engineers had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach and solid understanding of the scope of work. AKM researched the project and demonstrated their understanding of alignment and permitting issues. AKM identified potential construction impacts in the City of Tustin's Old Town area. They recommended traffic control altematives to mitigate potential difficulties during construction. AKM emphasized the importance of a project management plan and dedication to quality control. AKM's proposed fee was the second lowest, however, their proposal was rated significantly higher than the lowest cost proposal. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The PSA may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. G WQIO alMWde OW RePWSIP C 36.7-39 741 AR-P& OW2W dM Revd m W0o 8 Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS These projects were included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. Under this Professional Services Agreement, the selected consultant will verify the adequacy of these documents and will alert the District if additional CEQA documentation is required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-36) 2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-39) 3. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 7-41) KNN:joJak GntdoWNgC^]aO PeP Tw 7.X 7.39.1<1 MVSO a]03[4.Ea Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A CONTRACT NO. 7-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 8,500 49% Design Staff $ 214,700 $ 214,700 $ 214,700 $ 214.700 $ 214,700 Consultant PSA $ 360.000 $ 360.000 $ 360,000 $ 222,676 $ 222,676 LConstwetionract $ 2.009.800 $ 2.009.800 $ 2,009,800 er $ 495,000 $ 495.000 $ 495,000 $ 929,000 $ 929,000 $ 929.000 $ 4.025.700 1 $ 4.025,700 $ - $ 4,025.700 1 $ 231.900 $ 222,676 $ 454,576 $ 8,500 2% n:\wy41aWM720)nekata\736\7-36 budget taCleAs BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Orange Trunk Improvements CONTRACT NO. 7-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE)%) Project Development $ 5,100 $ 5,100 $ 12,900 $ 18,000 $ 5,100 $ 12,900 $ 18,000 $ 12,600 70% Design Staff $ 194.600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600 $ 194,600 V SA $ 160.000 $ 160,000 $ 64.098 $ 224,098 $ 224,098 $ 224,098 Contract $ 2,137200 $ 2,137,200 $ 2137.200 OtherStaff $ 535,800 $ 535,800 $ 535800 $ 909.800 $ 909,800 $ 76.998 $ 832,802 $ 3.942,500 $ 3,942.500 1 $ - $ 3,942,500 $ 199,700 $ 236,998 1 $ 436,698 $ 12,600 1 3% h9wp.elsdeng172dnekeyaV-39V39 budget lable.ele BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements CONTRACT NO. 7-41 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 8.500 $ 8,500 $ 15,500 $ 24,000 $ 8,500 $ 15,500 $ 24,000 $ 16.700 70% Design Staff $ 157,900 $ 157.900 $ 157,900 $ 157,900 $ 157,900 E SA $ 253.000 $ 253,000 $ 111.684 $ 364,684 $ 364,684 $ 364,684 Contract $ 3,190,600 $ 3,190,600 $ 3,190,600 Other Staff $ 777,800 $ 777,800 $ 777.800 $ 1.316,300 $ 1,316,300 $ 127.184 $ 1,189,116 $ 5,704,100 1 $ 5,704,100 $ - $ 5.704.100 1 $ 1661400 $ 380.184 1 $ 546,584 $ 16,700 3% h1wp.41al ngp20\nekayaV41 Vil budget Iable.xle PDC COMMITTEE goate To ad.Ofolr. 031r03; 03..0 AGENDA REPORT 'a"" nba 3N nb.j Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Ludwl , irecto r of Engineering Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: FOSTER PUMP STATION REHABLITATION, JOB NO. J-59 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Direct Staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, to replace the Foster Pump Station. SUMMARY This report provides additional information regarding the need to construct a new pump station. The following information further clarifies the Staffs recommendation for this facility. Need for Replacement As indicated in the attached Agenda Report from the February Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee Meeting, previous engineering studies have concluded that the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS) has reached the end of its useful life. The reliability of the FPS has become increasingly suspect as the facility continues to age and deteriorate. The FPS serves an important role in the District's ability to reliably discharge effluent without spilling into the Santa Ana River. The FPS will be required to continue serving the following functions: • Continue to provide backup for routine maintenance of the District's Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS), twice per year. • Provide an emergency backup to operate independently through the 120-inch outfall in the event of a failure at OOBS such as loss of power or mechanical problems. In the recent past, one or two power outages occur per year, causing GOBS to come off-line. • Provide discharge through the 78-inch outfall during a high flow emergency, estimated to occur once every 1.5 years today, reducing to once every 3 years when Groundwater Replenishment System is on-line to provide additional peak flow relief. It should be noted that the rated capacity of COBS is 480 mgd (at high tide), which has been exceeded five times in recent years. COBS has handled flows in excess of 480 mgd because of favorable tide conditions. p,„W WM Page 1 In the future, the Foster Pump Station (FPS) will be required to provide additional functions that it is presently not capable of serving. These functions include: • Operating in conjunction with Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS), at the same operating pressure, to allow portions of OOBS to be taken out of service for a scheduled major rehabilitation. • Pumping exclusively secondary effluent through the 78-inch outfall in a peak flow emergency. • Optional pumping of secondary effluent from Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1 for phases 2 and 3 of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The existing FPS is not capable of serving the above functions due to the following limitations: • The existing FPS structure (wet well) is too shallow and narrow to handle flows required to serve as a back up to OOBS. Therefore, the entire FPS structure would need to be rebuilt in order to provide a back up to OOBS. • The existing pumps, electrical gear, and structure do not allow the FPS to produce sufficient pressure to operate in conjunction with OOBS, through the 120-inch outfall. These limitations make the FPS insufficient to provide backup necessary to perform major electrical, mechanical and control system overhaul of OOBS scheduled in 2005. Additionally, OOBS is no longer a "new facility", approaching 15 years in age, and will be subject to more maintenance over time, requiring a more reliable back up. The FPS was the District's main effluent pumping station prior to OOBS coming on-line in 1990. When OOBS was placed on-line, the FPS was placed in stand-by. Additional concerns with the condition of the FPS include: • Replacement parts are no longer manufactured for the aging equipment. Parts must be custom fabricated, requiring long lead-time. • The FPS electrical system does not meet present standards. • If the FPS is left"as-is" it will become inoperable and unmaintainable. • The FPS foundation structure does not provide adequate seismic support to withstand liquefaction. The structure sits astride a high-activity level earthquake fault. Regulatory Considerations The District's 1998 ocean discharge permit allows the use of the 78-inch outfall in emergency conditions, and the Santa Ana River discharge in an extreme emergency. In the past, it has been the District's policy to provide necessary system redundancy to avoid overflows to the Santa Ana River. This policy has allowed the District to operate ••e."a. MM Page 2 reliably in emergency situations, and thereby maintain favorable consideration for continuation of our waiver from full secondary treatment. Recommended Project The evaluation report prepared by Carollo Engineers, dated December 8, 1999, compared the cost of rehabilitation of the Foster Pump Station (FPS)with construction of a new effluent pump station. Because of liability concerns and the location of the FPS directly on an active earthquake fault, it is not recommended that partial upgrades be performed on the facility. Additionally, the operational requirements listed above will not be accomplished short of replacement of the FPS with a new effluent pump station. Estimated costs for seismic reinforcement of the concrete channel, wet well and building foundation is difficult to quantify without further extensive investigative testing. However, preliminary estimates for the seismic retrofit would cost approximately $5 million with a total structural and mechanical renovation cost of$18.8 million. This cost would be within 3% of the cost of construction of a new effluent pumping facility, estimated at $19.4 million. The Strategic Plan and the 1999-00 CIP budget include a $28 million Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation project. This budget would be sufficient to cover the estimated total project cost for a new effluent pump station. Staff recommends that this project be changed to encompass the construction of a new effluent pumping station as supported by the referenced Carollo Engineers report (refer to attached February Planning, Design and Construction (PDC)Agenda Report). In keeping with this revised project concept, Staff recommends that the project be renamed "Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-T/." The recommended project will address deficiencies in the existing Foster Pump Station, meet pumping requirements during peak flow emergencies, and provide reliable back up for OOBS during maintenance activities and unplanned outages. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Projected costs should not be significantly altered as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8—Page 107) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached Agenda Report from the February PDC Committee meeting. R� M, Page 3 ALTERNATIVES Please refer to the attached agenda report from the February Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee Meeting. CEQA FINDINGS The Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The proposed revised project, construction a new effluent pump station annex, will require that a supplement to the EIR be prepared. ATTACHMENTS Agenda Report from the February 2000 PDC Committee Meeting RW,.jak G:WglegaMgenda Drag RepoftWDC V-59,J-77 AR OMMOAm a°`e°°, anoee Page 4 PDCCOMMMEE Te nemnywsa.mar. 04031re 00 07J73100 AGENDA REPORT Min Number Item Number PM OO-o1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED BY CAROLLO ENGINEERS REGARDING JOB NO. J-59 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Evaluation Study dated December 8, 1999 by Carrillo Engineers in connection with Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. J-59. SUMMARY The original project Scope of Work was to rehabilitate the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS). The current Strategic Plan identified FPS as the facility for pumping secondary treated water exclusively through the 78-inch ouffall during "excess float' events, providing back-up to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS)for pumping the mixed effluent through the 120-inch outfall, and pumping secondary effluent from Plant No. 2 to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System at Plant No. 1 during Phases II and III of the GWR project. The District initiated a preliminary evaluation study with Cardillo Engineers to determine the feasibility of renovating the existing FPS structure. The study which resulted in the report entitled "Evaluation of Secondary Effluent Pumping at Plant No. 2", dated December 1999, provided the following findings: • The District would like to have backup pumping capacity for the COBS to allow one half ofthe station to be taken out of service to upgrade electrical systems or perform maintenance, while maintaining the ability to pump 480 million gallons per day (mgd) to the 120-inch ocean ouffall. Backup of OOBS would require the ability to pump against a total dynamic head of 95 feet. The existing wet well at FPS is not deep enough to provide the required submergence for this pumping capacity. • Foster Pump Station is located on a high activity strike-slip seismic fault. This places the existing structure, (including the existing wet well), at a relatively high risk for soil liquefaction as well as horizontal movement along the actual fault line. While costly, (approximately $5 million), the structure and wet well can be retrofitted to provide protection against vertical seismic settlement. However, protection from lateral seismic movement is not possible without totally relocating the structure off the fault line. per., eMM Page 1 • Seismic retrofit of the wet well for Foster Pump Station (FPS) to protect against vertical settlement, would require that the whole facility be totally taken out of service for a considerable period of time while the retrofit occurs. Therefore, there would be no emergency back up pumping available for the 78-inch oulfall during this retrofit process. • Construction of a new Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) Annex will provide a structure that can be expanded in the future (beyond 2020) as secondary flows increase. Current proposed capacity of the OOBS Annex would add 240-mgd pumping capacity to the 480-mgd existing main OOBS capacity. This 760-mgd combined pumping capacity should handle expected peak flows through the year 2020. An additional 240-mgd upgrade to the OOBS Annex will provide the necessary capacity to pump the estimated 1000-mgd peak flow projected for ultimate build-out conditions after the year 2020. • Costs for new construction of a new OOBS Annex are estimated at $19.4 million. Comparably, rehabilitation costs for the existing FPS, which are estimated at $18.8 million. Though rehabilitation would greatly improve the existing structure, it will still be an inferior structure to a new OOBS Annex at a comparable cost. • Construction of a new OOBS Annex is the recommended approach to provide the necessary pumping requirements of secondary effluent at Plant No. 2. Therefore, District Staff recommends a change in the Scope of Work of this project to encompass the construction of the new OOBS facility as recommended by Carollo Engineers. The name of the project will be changed to "Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) AnnerC to accurately reflect the change in the Scope of Work. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY As costs for the revised Scope of Work are comparable, the existing budget should not be significantly altered. However, a Budget Information Table has been calculated and attached. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8---Page 107) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The original FPS structure is over 50 years old. According to District records, an upgrade project was implemented in 1963. Within the last few years, minor seismic upgrades were made, including addition of tie-downs to the walls and roof of the structure. However, no seismic upgrades of the equipment pads, foundation, or the wet well for this structure have been implemented. Originally, the District planned the upgrade of FPS as a temporary backup facility to the main GOBS until its replacement by a new OOBS Annex in the year 2020. wow Page 2 Within the last year, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) raised concerns regarding the availability of backup pumping capacity during major maintenance on the main Ocean Ouffall Booster Station (OOBS) facility pumps scheduled to occur in 2005. Said maintenance will disable half of the total capacity of the OOBS facility for an extended period of time. District Staff, knowing that the current Foster Pump Station (FPS) would not be able to provide the necessary backup capacity, hired Carollo Engineers to perform a preliminary study to analyze the feasibility of accelerating the FPS upgrade project to provide a timely backup capacity. During the course of this study, it was concluded that the FPS had several limitations (see following paragraph) that would preclude it as a reliable backup of the OOBS facility during this upcoming scheduled maintenance. The J-33/34 project report (Carollo 1993) evaluated the existing FPS and concluded that the facility is nearing the end of its useful life. The FPS structure does not meet current seismic codes and would require extensive seismic retrofit. In addition, it has a shallow foundation and sits directly over a high activity level strike-slip seismic fault segment that traverses Plant No. 2. Therefore, there is a relatively high risk of soil liquefaction (vertical settlement), which can be reduced through costly measures. However, the risk of horizontal movement along the fault (shear failure) can not be lessened or alleviated through any known methodology without total relocation of the structure off of the existing fault. Additionally, the capacity of FPS is limited to 320-mgd due to wet well restrictions. Upgrade of the FPS for long-term service would require a new building shell (roof, walls, etc.), to meet current codes; replacement of all major mechanical and electrical equipment including new pumps, drives, and motors; new 96-inch discharge header to Surge Tower No. 2; and a new power supply, controls, and tie-in to the plant's automation system. Four pumps (3 + 1 standby), would be dedicated to discharge to the outfall system and two pumps (1 + 1 standby), dedicated to pumping secondary effluent to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System at Plant No. 1. Further, the study indicates that only the OOBS Annex option can provide backup for OOBS. The FPS wet well is not deep enough to provide the required submergence for the high head pumping (95 TDH). Therefore, with temporary backup, not possible through minor temporary upgrade, the remaining options for backup of the main OOBS were limited to total renovation of FPS or replacement of the FPS with a new OOBS Annex. A cost comparison of these two options showed an insignificant increase (approximately 3%) in total cost for the construction of the new OOBS Annex ($19.4 million) over that of renovation of the FPS ($18.8 million). With the reliability of the renovated FPS facility highly questionable, it stands to reason that the project Scope of Work should be altered to encompass the new construction of an OOBS Annex. ALTERNATIVES Rehabilitate Foster Pump Station at a cost of$18.8 million. R,a,,.. &,area Page 3 CEQA FINDINGS Foster Pump Station Rehabilitation was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table RW:jak G:4dg1abMgenda Draft RepndsNDCUSOAR FeW0 .dw Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FOSTER PUMP STATION REHABILITATION JOB NO. J-59 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 370.000 $ 148000 $ 148,000 $ 148.000 S - $ 148,000 $ 20,216 14% Design Staff $ 1,851,000 $ $ " $ $ $ - $ Consultant PSA $ 4.676000 $ $ '1 $ 30,980 $ - $ 30,980 $ 24,980 81% Construction Contract $ 2,170000 $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ Construction Other $ 19077,000 $ $ $ - $ ' - $ - $ Construction Staff $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - $ Contingency $ 56,000 $ 2800 $ 2,800 $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 28,200,000 $ 150,800 $ - $ 150.800 1 $ 178.980 1 $ - $ 178,980 $ 45,196 25% Forrm.R.A . Foevlaetl 12I17198 e, 'a Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 8, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Thomas R. Sallarelli, Chair John M. Gullixson Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Mark A. Murphy Shawn Boyd Shirley McCracken STAFF PRESENT: James W. Silva Jan Debay, Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Use Tomko, Acting Director of Human OTHERS PRESENT: Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Tom Nixon, General Counsel Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Don Hughes Mike White, Controller Jeff Bower Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Rita Seymor Manager Joe Fournier Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Bob Geggie Ryal Wheeler (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the February 9, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. A a Minutes of the Finance, Administration.and Human Resources Committee Meeting , Page 2 March 8, 2000 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the budget process was underway. There are some outstanding issues with budget assumptions regarding staffing. Blake Anderson will be talking to the Steering Committee about these at its next meeting. Mr. Anderson's proposal will be to develop comprehensive staffing plans in conjunction with an operations plan that will go to the Board later this year. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson discussed an article that appeared in The Register last week regarding the groundwater replenishment system. He reported that reporter Gary Robbins has spent much time with staff trying to understand the complex issues connected with the GWR system. He further reported no telephone calls were received as a result of the article. Mr. Robbins will be doing a series of articles on the various water issues in the near future. The Assistant General Manager also discussed the upcoming GWR Board Workshop to be held on March 25' from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Alternate Directors from our Board, Directors of the Orange County Water District , and the Rate Advisory Committee and Planning Advisory Committee members were being invited to attend this workshop. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed introduced Jeff Bower of PaineWebber, and Rita Seymor and Joe Fournier of PIMCO, to the Directors. Mr. Streed also reported that the bankruptcy proceeds were distributed a several weeks ago. Four checks were received from three different financial institutions, only one of which is the same bank the District utilizes. However, the most significant amount of the money received was drawn on a bank that could only be deposited in Boston. A special account was opened on Thursday and the money was sent overnight and had it invested by Friday. Because of that strategy, the District was able to earn an extra $30,900 of interest by moving quickly. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications was not present. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Nixon reported on the South Coast Metro matter and advised that counsel was wailing to receive a legal description of the easement which is being prepared by Bush and Associates. It is anticipated that the matter will be resolved shortly after it is received. Mr. Nixon then advised that a hearing date has been scheduled for June 8 pertaining to the CEQA aspect of the litigation regarding the Kern County ordinance on biosolids. A cross-complaint had just been received which challenges several of the District's CEQA determinations with regard to biosolids 9 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 March 8, 2000 matters such as The Tule Ranch and Yakima Company. Counsel is presently evaluating the cross- complaint, and will apprise the Board in closed session of that evaluation when it is complete. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-d) a. FAHR00-18: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2000. The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance with the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. b. FAHROD-19: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHROD-20: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of February 10, 2000. d. FAHR00-21: Item deleted by staff END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(a) through (c) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-c) a. FAHROO-22: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. A verbal report was given by Rita Seymor and Joe Fournier of PIMCO regarding the District's current investment policy, strategy and economic outlook. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. b. FAHR00-23: Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland &Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999- 00 for an amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years 2000-01 and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03 and 2003-04 upon Board approval. Mike White gave a brief overview of the evaluation of proposals and selection of recommended independent auditors, Moreland &Associates. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. C. FAHR00-24: Consolidation of Revenue Area Financial Plans and Rates, except Revenue Areas 7 and 14. Gary Streed gave a brief history of the District's rate structure prior to consolidation and explained why staff was now proposing consolidation of the Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 March 8, 2000 different revenue areas. Directors commended Gary on an excellent presentation. and requested the same presentation be given to the entire Board as information only. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to provide the Board of Directors with the same presentation as information only in order to determine if additional information is needed in order to approve a recommendation. (14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR00-25: Update on COP Restructuring and existing COP Structure Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, gave a brief report on the District's existing certificates of participation and the plan to update the structure to reflect consolidation. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none (17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 12, 2000 at 5 p.m. (18) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:20 p.m. Submit tad by: Penny M. K e FAHR Co m ittee Secr ry H:4vp.dfalagendalFAHRIFAHR200012000 Mlnufes1030800 FAHR MIN.doe FAHRCOMMITTEE we3Ung0ate TOBd.Or01r. T 03/08/00 03/UJ00 AGENDA REPORT be t i M Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2000., SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H:Ix AWWiMQlP eTAHWah"% ATHu es ReWI-FOAM RensW WM Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION it Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. On February 24, 2000, the District received $63.5 million from the Orange County Investment Pool settlement distributions. The funds were deposited in the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances EsBmated Funds/Accounts February 29,2000 Yield(°k) State of Calif. LAIF $ 24,175,271 5.8 Union Bank Checking Account 337,214 — Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3,328.000 5.1 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 19,565,992 5.2 PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 344,497.416 4.4 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,010 5.7 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,158,124 6.0 Petty Cash 8,900 — TOTAL $424,070,927 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report N 1xy.ElaYinV IOkianeYgXFFa°(lWJWa„TrtawMf Ptvl-Fft Gtt Rem d. MOM Page 2 I 1 111 1 District Fund Balances • � � � � � � � � IIIIII IIII. \\\\ IIIIIIIIIIAMEMIN ❖. 3333///i ?XOM. e.•oo.•. !.... a.... !.... ..... :❖.❖.' !❖.❖.' .❖.❖.' ❖:❖2 ❖:❖S :❖.�.•., �.�.�.�.•, ..... ... .. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... •2❖:•.' X33M ❖2 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... • . - . . R / 1 . MONTHLY REPORT " ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 19 February 1000) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $19,652,945 • Mellon $19,565,992 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $19,587,145 • Mellon $19,516,525 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $29,682 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 78% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averts a Portfolio Credit Quality; "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% I5.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.58 0.43 3 Months: 1.52 1.31 12 Months: 5.46 4.90 Year-to-Date: 1.04 0.87 Commentary Interest rates m the shortsnd ofate yield curve continued to rise during Febnuuy in expectation of additional interest one tightening by the Fed(e.g.3-month Treasury Bill sates one 9 basis points). • The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benclunmk by 13 bassi points in February. • PIMCO's decision to maintain a below-index duration added slightly m portfolio return. • PIMCO'6 emphasis on corporates and commercial paper slightly enhanced remms. e'L.1m//MCRI_.Nfl2fFDLIQaNeAPT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 29 February 2000) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $344,527,241 • Mellon $344,497,416 Historical Cost: $347,326,352 • PIMCO $348,040,409 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.23 Of Index: 2.37 15.13 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,762,645 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 48% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.62 0.71 3 Months: 0.59 0.50 12 Months: 3.24 3.10 Year-to-Date: 0.63 0.49 Commentary While shsus<nd interest sates moved higher in February,yields on longer maturities,declined(e.g.2 and 5-year Treasury Note rates fell end a basis points,respectively). The Long-Term pumollo underperformed its benchmark by 1 i basis points in Febmary. P16/CO's decision ro maintain a below-index duration detracted slightly fmm portfolio retems given the decline In longm-Wn Interest ratu. PIMCO's decision to hold mortgage securities added to relative means,while their emphasis on corpamks dehaaed from rehuns given theirweak pMormance. as,...urx awsvt°i..aensro'..Wr Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ' I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSFV7511102 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY LIQUID OPP.R-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 70,927-42 70,927.42 0.36% 0.00 TOTAL 70,927.42 70.927.42 036% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,679,225.50 2,679,225.50 13.54% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,191.67 17.24% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,288,261.00 1,288,261.00 6.51% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 2,499,916.67 2,488,916.67 12.59% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THN IYR 3,799,3%.22 3,799,396.22 19.20% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 13,666,991.06 13,666,991.06 69.06% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 1 ,737,908.48 13,737,90&48 69.42% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 999,200.00 999,840.00 5.05% 640.00 ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 902,664.00 4.56% -3,249.00 BANKING&FINANCE 1,497,145.50 1,495,318.50 7.56% -1,827.00 INDUSTRIAL 1,935,205.00 1,921,446.00 9.71% .13,759.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 5I2,080.00 308,815.00 2.57% -3,265.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 5,849,543.50 5,828,083.50 29.45% -21,460.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5,849,543.50 51828,08350 29.45% -21,460.00 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESRU3CEIVABLES 223,959.80 223,959.80 1.13% 0.00 TOTAL 223,059.80 223,959.80 1.13% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS MTW9.80 223 1.13% 0.00 07-Ma 2000 9:09:48 &eeutiw Wa,kh n.h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY DCSFV7511102 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,811,411.78 19,789,951.78 100.00% -21,460.00 07-144rv2000 9:09:48 Fs ufhx Wmkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: .1 NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE: USD OCSF07522202 29-FED-2000 PRELIMINARY LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINAASS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 2,464,610.21 2,464,610.21 0.71% 0.00 PAYABLES -56,352,929.09 •56,352,929.09 -16.19% 0.00 TOTAL .53,998,318.88 -53,898,318.88 .15.48% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 48,256,122.73 49,256,122.73 13.86% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 5,757,755.89 5,757,755.89 1.65% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 10,492,307.22 10,492,307.22 3.01% 0.00 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 56,500,000.00 56,500,000.00 16.23% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 517,367.17 517,367.17 0.15% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 121,523,553.01 121,523,553.01 34.91% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 7,63 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 100,996,298.55 99,455,819.22 28.57% -1,430.479.33 U.S.AGENCIES 53,155,037.57 52,378,963.66 15.05% ,776,073.91 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 25,454,375.00 25,674,040.00 7.38% 219,665.00 ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,593,829.01 3,556,426.59 1.02% .37,402.42 FHLMC POOLS 9,370,079.48 9,170,667.20 2.63% 199,412.28 FHLMC MULTICLASS 8,063,554.83 7,832,457.54 2.25% -231,097.29 FNMA POOLS 955,371.92 942,719.00 0.27% -12,652.92 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 52,625.81 52.510.57 0.02% -115.24 ASS:HOME EQUITY 405,177.61 404,164.67 0.12% -1,012.94 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 98060.00 0.28% -13,140.00 BANKING&FINANCE 57,699,83120 57,331,822.50 16.47% -368,008.70 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,199.00 6,906,456.05 1.%% -319,732.95 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 5,145,550.00 4,959,550.00 1.42% -186,000.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,309,725.00 2.10% -197,530.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 280,405,174.98 276,862,192.00 79.54% -3,542,992.98 07-Ma-2000 9:15:13 Executive Wwkbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 29-FEB-2000 PRELIMINARY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ,17 . S 76, 62,,182.E 79.54% -3,542,992.98 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,569,16239 3,569,162.38 1.03% 0.00 TOTAL 3,569,162.38 3,569,162.38 1.03% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS �,569,16TJ8 �3,5 9,,�3$. 1.03% 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 351,609,571.49 348,0669578.51 100.00% 3,542,992.98 07-Mar-2000 9:15:13 Executive Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE I O SP07511102 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME i 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT HOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 6-P PRICE RAREST VALUE B TOTAL _________________ ------- _______ ------- _______ ____________ ________-- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS .00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HGAT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 996085247 AAA .00 .00 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 92.462 3,411,191.67 24.95 912395DE4 03/02/2000 DD 03/04/99 A-1+ 3,411,181.67 17.50 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN AN CUES DISC 5.321 .000 P-1 99.9B4 3,799,396.22 23.39 313384TT6 MAT 03/01/2000 A-1+ 3,799,396.22 19.49 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MIR ASSN DISCOUNT 5.725 .000 P-1 99.557 2,488,916.67 10.22 313588TU9 HAT 03/02/2000 A-1+ 2,488,916.67 12.77 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL ROM6 LN HIS CORP DISC 5.85E .000 P-1 91.093 1,289,261.00 9.42 313396HA3 HAT 04/25/2000 INCOME AT HAT A-3+ 1,288,261.00 6.61 900,000.00 FLORIDA FEE CORP DISC 5.860 .000 P-1 95.492 995,336.00 6.55 34110AC68 03/06/2000 895,336.00 4.59 900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 5.895 .000 P-1 99.061 891,546.50 6.52 98412CWO 04/12/2000 891,546.50 4.57 900,000.00 DAINLRRCHRYLSER DISC 5.941 .000 99.149 892,343.00 6.52 233GEOMI 04/10/2000 892,343.00 4.58 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.529 .000 13,666,981.06 100.00 13,666,981.06 30.11 YLDANAI. YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 MSM7511102 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YEN AT CUM" MOODY HAR ET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD R-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- PIKED INCOME SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN HTO CORP DEBB .000 4.306 AAA 99.904 999,200.00 13.15 313dA3RT5 PLTG RT 05/18/2000 DD 05/18/99 AAA 999,84D.00 5.13 475,000.00 ASSOCIATES CODE NORTH AVER 6.296 6.009 AA3 99.843 474,233.25 8.13 046003EL9 6.000% 06/15/200D A4 474,254.25 2.43 900,000.00 FORD NTR CR ME 3 TR 00530 6.312 6.999 Al 100.296 905,913.DO 15.40 345402YXI 3.0201 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 902,664.00 4.63 400,000.00 LEMAN ERGS BLURB HER TR 00252 6.353 6.415 A3 99.363 400,216.00 6.84 52517PMI 6.4001 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,068.00 2.05 900,000.00 GENERAL NTRS CORE SIR 6.425 9.44E A2 101.069 922,060.00 15.33 370442ANS 9.625% 12/01/2000 DD 12/01/90 A 916,021.00 4.30 150,000.00 MEGAN J P 6 CO HTH ER 00043 6.430 6.153 Al 99.546 149,625.00 2.56 61fi B3YBUO 6.125\ 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/97 AA 149,319.00 .33 500,000.00 INTRRHATIONAL PAPER CO NT 6.533 9.690 A3 100.102 506,445.OD 8.50 460146AJ2 9.300% 03/15/2000 DD 03/21/90 BBS. 500,510.00 2.57 500,000.00 BURLINGTON NEE INC NY 6.578 9.546 A3 1DO.B23 505,900.00 8.64 122014AB9 9.625% 06/15/2000 DO 06/28/90 A- 504,115.00 2.59 500,000.00 GTE CORP DEB 6.669 9.213 BAAI 101.763 512,000.00 8.73 36232OA96 9.335\ 12/01/2000 A 508,815.00 2.61 475,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORD 6.620 6.406 BMI 99.511 473,031.25 8.11 31SO74APO 6.335% 10/15/2000 DD 10/11/95 A- 472,673.25 2.42 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL PINED INCOME SECURITIES 4.599 6.866 5,84a,543.50 100.00 5,928,083.50 29.90 TOTAL 5.215 2.320 19,S16,524.S6 100.00 19,495,064.S6 100.00 YLDAHAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 3 OCSF07522202 2000/02/29 RUN DATE , 03/03/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT ROODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MEANT VALUE 8 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 517,367.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 5.444 AAA 100.000 517,367.17 .42 996085247 AAA 527,367.17 .13 56,500,000.00 GOLUMAN SACHS LP REPO 5.600 5.600 100.000 56,SOD,O00.00 46.49 99366Y204 05.600% 03/01/2000 DO 02/29/00 56,500,000.DO 14.18 200,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL HUG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.633 .000 P-1 99.764 199,520.33 .16 3135807119 HAT 03/02/2000 A-lf 199,528.33 .OS 700,000.00 FEDERAL NO= IN RIG COMP DISC 5.635 .000 P-1 99.561 696,923.89 .57 313396T86 RAT 03/07/2000 A-14 696,923.89 .13 1,400,000.00 CANPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.767 .000 P-1 99.538 1,393,526.56 1.14 13443MP0 03/23/2000 1,393,526.56 .35 10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.769 .000 P-1 98.969 10,292,778.89 8.46 313588VV4 HAT 04/20/2000 A-1F 10,292,790.89 2.58 3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMR DISC 5.777 .DOD P-1 99.312 3,589,632.00 2.95 0222SACR0 03/14/2000 3,509,632.00 .90 2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 5.202 .000 P-1 99.455 2,505,831.44 2.12 34539TC06 03/08/2000 2,585,831.44 .65 6,300,000.00 GENERAL RLEC CAP DISC 5.665 .000 P-1 99.064 9,222,307.39 6.76 36959ED39 04/07/2000 0,222,307.39 2.06 4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 5.869 .000 P-1 98.999 4,256,973.72 3.50 44922ADA5 04/10/2000 4,256,973.72 1.03 700,000.00 DAINLERCHRYLSOR DISC 5.884 .000 99.254 694,776.44 .57 233820MI 04/10/2000 694,776.44 .13 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAM 4 OCOP07522002 2000/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/03/00 DISTRICT( LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL C0ST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _______ _______ ------- ________ ____________ __________ 14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 5.888 .000 P-1 99.012 13,061,699.45 11.40 90412CDN9 04/17/2000 13,061,699.45 3.49 2,800,000.00 CRA (DBLAWAR) DISC 5.913 .000 90.927 2,769,970.00 2.27 12478JD37 04/03/2000 2,769,970.00 .30 7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.009 .000 P-1 98.682 6,907,055.56 5.68 36959HEK9 05/19/2000 6,907,755.56 1.23 5,100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS MW MTO CORP DISC 6.053 .000 P-1 99.232 5,060,832.00 4.16 313396UP6 MAT 03/21/2000 A-1a 5,060,832.00 1.27 4,000,000.00 IBM DISC 7.234 .000 P-1 99.341 3,973,650.17 3.26 44922ACM0 03/21/2000 3,973,650.17 1.00 ________ _______ _________________ ________- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.645 3.767 121,523,553.01 100.00 121,523,553.02 30.49 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,DDO,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.796 Al 99.983 1,992,800.00 .I2 066365DM4 FLING RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,999,740.00 .50 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LIO MTN IM00615 .000 6.022 Al 99.984 3,498,635.00 1.26 17120QEDO FLING RT O9/08/2002 DID 04/00/98 A4 3,499,440.00 .88 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS .000 6.182 Al 99.991 2,994,300.00 1.00 209111CU5 FL9Xi RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 2,999,730.00 .05 340,811.60 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 .000 6.506 AAA 99.125 332,504.51 .12 3134BSW93 6.304% 01/01/202B OD 12/01/97 AAA 334,421.58 .08 2,000,000.00 FORD MTN CR CO GLOBAL NT9 .000 6.245 At 99.656 1,992,500.00 .01 345392RV7 PLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,993,120.00 .5D 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 6.219 Al 99.859 1,998,613.60 .32 345397WO FLTO RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 Ai 1,997,180.00 .50 31000,000.00 GENERAL MISS ACCEP MTN .000 6.491 A2 100.375 3,010,830.00 1.08 32042MVR9 FLING RT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/90 A 3,011,250.OD .06 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN .000 5.506 A2 99.677 3,918,366.50 1.42 300425QVS PLTG AT O8/18/2003 DO O0/17/98 A 3,937,241.50 .99 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSP07522202 2000/02/29 RUN DATE 03/03/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT ROODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ ----------------------------- ------- ------- _______ ________ ------------ -_-_----__ 2.800,OU0.00 GERA DID ETHIC TR 2000-9 PH .000 6.320 AAA 100.000 2,800,000.00 1.01 3833H4N89 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,800,000.00 .30 2,000,000.00 HEELER PINAUCIAL INC NTS .000 6.374 A3 100.548 2,000,000.00 .I2 423328BRO FLTG RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 2,010,960.00 .50 3�000o000.00 RELLRR FIML MIN M 00246 .000 6.257 A3 100.681 3,000,000.00 1.09 42333HLP7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/27/99 A- 3,020,430.00 .I6 4,000.00D.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 6.423 A2 100.272 4,000,000.00 1.44 44181KEA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 A 4,010,880.00 I.01 1.00Oj000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN ME SR 100570 .000 5.326 A2 100.319 999,180.90 .36 4418IR1T4 FLTG RI 09/01/2001 DO 09/04/99 A 1,003,180.00 .25 5,000,000.00 ERHMAN BROS MUGS MTR .ODD 6.655 A3 100.281 51000,000.00 1.01 52517P003 FLTG RT 12/12/2002 DD 12/07/99 A 51014,050.00 1.26 1,700,000.00 NORGAN STANLBY WE 4TR 00311 .000 6.169 AA3 99.953 1,699,517.20 .61 61745EUY3 MIR RT O1/28/2002 DD O1/27/00 Aa 1,699,201.00 .43 _ 7,356,020.00 US TREASURY INFITION INDEX HT 3.697 3.658 AM 99.094 7,332,963.77 2.63 9128273AO 3.625% O7/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 AM 1.289,374.46 1.83 10,622,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.I20 3.533 AAA 94.469 10,343,575.00 3.62 9128232M3 3.335% 01/15/2007 DD O1/15/97 AAA 10,035,063.99 2.52 1,000,330.00 US TREASURY INPLATICH INDEX HT 4.330 4.263 AAA 99.683 993,250.00 .36 912027SWO 4.250E001/15/2010 DD O1/15100 AAA 597,198.97 .25 4,000,000.00 MORGAH STANLEY MTH #TR 00299 5.130 5.466 RAI 95.859 3,193.388.00 1.44 617452MI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DD 04/15/99 A4 3,994,360.00 1.00 2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.391 AAA 59.350 2,167,321.15 .75 912823154 06.3358 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,094.750.00 .53 5,200,D00.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.613 10.189 AAA 116.541 61698,250.00 2.18 912810MO 11.835E 11/15/2003 DD 10/05/83 AAA 6,06D.444.00 1.52 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR HIS 5.650 6.610 AA3 98.336 2,543,215.00 .53 046003MB 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 A+ 1,435.040.00 .33 1,000,000.00 HELIbR PINAMCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.894 A3 97.557 119,730.00 .35 42333HKGO 5.350% 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/96 A- 975,570.00 .24 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 6 OCBF07522202 2000/02/21 RUN DATE t 03/03/00 DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 13.13.50 v..vv........v.v.............v...v....................................................................v................... PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT NODDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,005,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD NTN S.B04 6.748 A3 96.921 2,060,739.00 .70 9124000N6 6.5401 02/20/2V03 DO 02/20/57 A- 1,943,266.05 .49 23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOYBH 5.807 5.702 AAA 90.656 23,352,289.85 8.34 9128275Q1 05.625% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/99 AAA 23,115,100.80 5.60 5,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.011 6.201 AAA 99.500 5,086,402.25 1.79 9129272LS 06.250% 02/20/2002 DO 02/20/97 AAA 4r975,000.00 1.25 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD NTH 5.849 6.776 A3 97.843 3,073,170.00 1.06 81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 2,935,290.00 .74 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C NTN 5.862 5.653 "1 99.953 5,996,400.00 2.16 63850JD26 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 AA- 5r997r180.00 1.51 494,503.45 FHLAC MULTICL NTO P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.933 99.437 493,BB7.93 .17 3133TO2D5 5.9001 06/15/2017 491,798.95 .12 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL XTO ASSN MTN 5.581 5.999 AAA 90.656 14,955,300.00 5.34 31364G2VO 5.0201 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,798,400.00 3.71 2,500,000.00 MBRRIL4 LYNCH HOTES 5.995 6.454 AGE 98.769 2,526,725.00 .09 590186XP4 6.3751 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,469,225.00 .62 1,516,650.70 ONNA II POOL #0080023 6.005 7.057 AAA 100.969 1,541,770.23 .55 36225CAX9 7.125% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,531,347.05 .30 7,500,000.00 BCLLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.256 AA2 97.463 7,497,255.00 2.64 079867AXS 6.000% 06/15/2002 BD 06/15/90 AAA 7,309,725.00 1.83 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO C011P DEBB 6.062 6.055 AAA 99.090 12,465,625.00 4.47 3134A3EM1 6.000% 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/99 AAA 12,3B6,250.00 3.11 2,000,000.00 BANK808TON CORP SR NTH 6.133 6.274 A2 97.619 1,99yr600.00 .10 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,952,380.00 .49 52,625.82 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.214 AAA 99.781 52,625.81 .01 3/677CAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 52,510.57 .01 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC HER ITR 00004 6.201 6.203 A3 18.666 1,000,000.00 .35 73317PADl 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BBB+ 986,060.00 .25 2,500,000.00 "LAC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 UT 6.207 6.178 AAA 97.125 2,455o B59.38 .07 3133TEKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,420,125.00 .61 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCV07522202 2000/02/21 RUN DATE 03/03/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME f 13.13.50 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD 5-P PRICE NARRET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ --_------- 405,177.61 GREEN TAKE COED 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.306 AAA 99.750 405,177.61 .14 3935052Y7 6.2904 10/15/2013 DO 00/26/99 AAA 404,164.67 .10 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG MEN K" 6.2%1 6.307 AAA 90.781 4,488,705.00 1.60 31364CBV5 6.230E 02/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,445,145.OD 1.12 3,109,518.68 PALM MULTICLASS CTP 23 A 6.316 6.279 AAA 97.110 3,112,919.52 1.09 3133MR95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 AAA 3,019,653.51 .76 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.930 A2 97.400 2,031,960.00 .70 073902MI 6.7504 04/15/2003 A 1,948,000.00 .49 21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM I BF MTG 6.394 6.918 AAA 93.156 19,860,625.00 7.23 OIN062631 6.500E 03/15/2030 AAA 20,028,540.00 5.03 2,000,000.00 POUIC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.86E AAA 94.644 2,000,BBB.00 .69 3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AM 1,892,88D.OD .48 2,398,413.64 FNLMC NULTICLASS CTP HER 1620E 6.528 7.167 AAA 83.115 2,242,353.70 .72 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,007,996.79 .50 7,700,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 6.601 5.405 AM 57.875 6,761,244.70 2.44 9128274VI 04.750E 11/15/2008 DO 11/15/98 AAA 6,766,375.00 1.70 25,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY "DIES 6.621 6.566 RAN 99.000 14,837,890.63 8.93 112827262 06.500E 10/15/2006 DO 10/15/96 AAA 24,750,000.00 6.21 8,818,535.37 FELMC DROOP 905-0476 6.62E 7.049 AAA 99.300 9,037,574.97 3.19 312ODDQSS 7.000E 02/01/2003 DO D2/01/98 AAA 8.036,245.62 2.22 6,2OI 060635 COMMIT TO PON15/ OHM 6P NTG 6.637 6.643 AAA 90.32E 5,593,750.00 2.03 OIM0606I5 6.000E 03/l5/I029 AAA Sr645,500.00 1.43 2,000,130.12 GNMA 11 POOL 4000000H 6.705 6.322 AAA 100.844 2,052,050.]8 .73 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/17 AAA 2.02f,029.54 .51 10,500,000.0E FEDERAL MONK LN NTH CORP DEW 6.711 6.556 AAA 96.094 10,323,075.00 3.64 3134A3TC0 6.3D04 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,089,570.00 2.53 2,000,000.00 KAREN 6 MCLENNAN COB INC SR HT 6.717 6.873 A3 16.395 1.992,280.0E .61 571748AB8 6.625E O6/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,927,900.00 .49 3,000,000.00 POND MR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.921 Al 16.699 2,115,080.00 1.04 345317313 6.100% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/19 A4 2,900,970.00 .73 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE - BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-Feb-2000 -1.70 99366F650 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-Feb-2000 -3.40 99366WI33 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-Feb-2000 -3.40 99366W687 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 0.00 CW 29-Feb-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40 996085247 01-Feb-2000 450.40 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40 996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 01-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Febd000 -8,146.96 996095247 02-Feb-2000 8,146.96 B 0.00 07-Ma -2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 'I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS CASH TRANSFERRED IN LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 RECD FROM OCSF07511112 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00 NA9123459 PER CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS 0.00 CD 28-Feb-2000 0.00 CASH TRANSFERRED OUT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 TRANSFER TO OCSF0752222 28-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00 NA9123459 PER CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS 0.00 CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00 CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 25-Feb-2000 63,524,590.44 NA9123459 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 0.00 CD 25-Feb-2000 0.00 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 JAN WIRE FEES 02-Feb-2000 -7.65 NA9123459 0.00 CW 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 JAN WIRE FEES 02-Feb-2000 -17.00 NA9123459 0.00 CW 02-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mo-2000 8:57.19 ECe=liw Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-Feb-2000 -1.70 993661`650 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-Feb-2000 -3.40 99366W 133 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-Feb-2000 -3.40 99366W687 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 0.00 CW 29-Feb-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 450.40 996085247 - 01-Feb-2000 450.40 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2000 -450.40 996095247 01-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 01-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 4,146.% 996085247 02-F6-2000 8,146.96 B 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCBD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 8,146.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -8,146.96 996095247 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,561,708.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -2.561,709.42 996085247 02-Feb-2000 2,561,709.42 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,561,708.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2000 -2,561,708.42 996085247 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -1,5%,459.56 313394TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 1,596,459.56 B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -1.596,459.56 313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC.NEW YORK 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -2,095,385.83 313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 2,095,385.83 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 -2,095,385.83 313384TDI MAT 02/162000 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Wa,Ahewh waa.VW�AI bAAI:l&I1Vf4 Ik1bllUUl PAGE.- PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETYL DATEI COSTi TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 02-Feb-2000 -9,427,040.00 3133%UP6 MAT 03212000 02-Feb-2000 9,427,040.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 02-Feb-2000 -9,427,040.00 313396UP6 MAT032l2000 02•Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Fd1-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,30D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 -1,294,667.11 313396TS2 MAT 02292000 03-Feb-2000 1,294,667.11 B HSBC SECS MC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 -1.294,667.11 313396TS2 MAT 02292000 03•Feb-2000 0.00 PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,323.77 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb-2000 -7,323.77 996087094 03-Peb-2000 7,323.77 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER•PIMCO 1,239.38 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb•2000 ' -I,239.39 996097094 03-Feb-2000 1.239.39 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER•PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Feb-2000 -2,488,916.67 313598TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 03-Feb-2000 2,488,916.67 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 07-Af r2000 8:57:/9 Eremiw Wwkbenek Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 'S PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000Io00D 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Feb-2000 -2,488,916.67 313588TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 PC WARBURG DI LON READ LLC,NEW 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 -895,336.00 341IOAC68 03/06/2000 03-Feb-2000 $95,336.00 R MERRI L LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 -995,336.00 341IOAC68 03/062000 03-Feb-2W0 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE PENNER 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,6DD,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-Feb-2000 -2,585,831.44 34539TC86 03/08/2000 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44 B BANK OF IRELAND,LONDON 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-Feb-20D0 -2,585,831.44 34539TC96 03/082000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 PC BANK OF IRELAND.LONDON 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,239.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -1,239.38 996095247 D4-Feb-2000 1,239.38 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,239.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-20D0 -1,23938 996085247 04-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 04-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Ma-2000 8:57:79 Executive Workbench Q JE- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FED-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,280,668.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -2,280,668.75 996095247 04-Feb-2000 2,280,668.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,280,668.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2000 -2,280,668.75 996DS5247 04-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MID CORP DIS 07-Feb-2000 -1,198,498.67 313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 07-Feb-2000 1,198,498.67 B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 07-Feb-2000 .1,198,498.67 313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 07-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 07-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00 99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/07/ 07-Feb-2000 2,300,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00 99366F650 05.6101/.02/082000 DD 02/07/ 07-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 07-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 81,928.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2000 .81,929.89 996085247 08-Feb-2000 81,929.99 B 0.00 07-My-2000 8.57:19 amllw Wakbe.6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE - 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 81,929.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2000 41,928.89 996085247 08-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 .3,376,834.67 44922ACMO 03/212000 08.Feb-2000 3,376,834.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 -3,376,834.67 44922ACMO 03212000 0&Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 08-Feb-2000 -3,484,619A4 313396TZ6 MAT 03/07/2000 08-F6-2000 3,484,619A4 B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 08-Feb-2000 -3,484,619.44 313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 09-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72 44922ADA5 04/102000 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72 B BANKERS TRUST CP/IPA,NEW YO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 08-Feb-2000 4,256,973.72 44922ADA5 04/102000 08-Feb-2000 0.00 FC BANKERS TRUST CPNPA,NEW YO 09-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Executive Wor.Uench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09•Feb-2000 -300.78 996085247 09-Feb.2000 300.78 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Feb-2000 -300.78 996085247 09-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 -8,222,307.39 36959HD79 04/072000 09.Feb-2000 8,222,307.39 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 -8,222,307.39 36959HD79 04/07/2000 09-F6-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,161.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb4000 .31,161.18 996085247 11-Feb-2000 31,161.18 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,161.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb-2000 ' -31,161.19 996085247 H-Feb-2000 0.00 FC II-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,319.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -31,319.17 996085247 14-Feb-2000 31,319.17 B 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000 -29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE DROVER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,319.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -31,319.17 996085247 14-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 14-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,453.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I4-Feb-2000 -8,453.50 996085247 14-Feb-2000 8,453.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,453.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2000 -8,453.50 996085247 14-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 14-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 14-Feb-2000 -891,546.50 98412CDCO 04/122000 14-Feb-200D 891,546.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 14-Feb-2000 -991,546.50 99412CDCO 04/122000 14-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I4-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,900.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00 996085247 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,800.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -12,800.00 996085247 15-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Ma -2000 8:57:19 Eeecvr:r: ir,.kbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,255,164.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -1,255,164.34 996085247 15-Feb-2000 1,255,164.34 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,255,164.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2000 -1,255,164.34 9%085247 15-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 15-Feb-2000 -10,292,778.89 313588VV4 MAT 04/202000 15-Feb-2000 10,292,778.89 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 15-Feb-2000 -10,292,778.99 313588VV4 MAT 0420/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I5-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 562.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 -562.19 996085247 16-Feb-2000 562.19 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 562.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 562.19 996085247 16-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.81 313384TE9 MAT 02/172000 16-Feb-2000 3,699,437.81 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 1/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000 - 29-FEB-2000 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAVULOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 16-Feb-2000 -199,529.33 313588TU9 MAT 03/=000 16-Feb-2000 199,52&33 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.81 313384TE9 MAT 02/17/2000 16-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 16-Feb-2000 -199,528.33 313588TU9 MAT 03/072000 16-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000A0 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 -13,861,699.45 98412CDH9 04/172000 16-Feb-2000 13,961 699.45 B GOLDMAN SACHS k CO,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 .13,861,699.45 98412CDH9 04/172000 16-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS A CO,NY 16-Febb2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,361.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOW I7-Feb-2000 19,361.29 996085247 17-Feb-2000 19,361,29 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,361.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Feb"w -19,361.29 996085247 17-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 17-Feb-2000 0.00 Warkbe b Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000moo 01-FEB-2000-29-FED-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,769.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Feb2000 -2,768.29 996085247 17-Feb-2000 2,769.28 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,768.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Peb-2000 -2,768.28 996085247 17-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,0M.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,997,493.33 313384TN9 MAT0225/2000 17-Feb-2000 1,997,493.33 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 IBM DISC 17-Feb-2000 -5%,815.50 44922ACMO 03/212000 17-Feb-2000 596,815.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,997.493.33 313384TN9 MAT 02/252000 17-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 IBM DISC 17-Feb-2000 596,815.50 44922ACMO 03212000 17-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39 313384TF6 MAT 02/10000 INCOME AT MAT 17-Feb-2000 1,699,738.39 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-Mw-2000 8:57.19 Eieculim Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 73 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FFW2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39 313384TF6 MAT 02/18/2000 INCOME AT MAT 17-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,296.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Feb-2000 -62,296.76 996085247 18-Feb-2000 62,286.76 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,286.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Feb-2000 -62,286.76 996085247 18-Feb-2000 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,121.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Feb-2000 -15,121.51 996085247 18-Feb-2000 15,121.51 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,121.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2000 .15,121.51 996085247 18-Feb-2000 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 18-Feb-2000 -892,343.00 233REODAI 04/102000 18-Feb-2000 892,343.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC I9-Feb-2000 -992,343.00 2338EODAI 04/102000 19-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER I8-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 &ecudvelYm S4pench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 18-Feb-2000 -1,697,355.56 313394TRO MAT02282000 18-Feb-2000 1,697,355.56 B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,OW.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC I8-Feb-2000 -1,697,355.56 313384TRO MAT021282000 18-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 18-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,725.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb.2000 42,725.50 996085247 22-Feb-2000 42,725.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,725.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb-2000 42,725.50 996085247 22-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Fcb-2000 -1,393,526.56 13443ACPS 03232000 23-Feb-2000 1,393,526.56 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Feb-2000 1,393,526.56 13443ACPS 03232000 23-Feb-2000 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 23-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,337.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2000 -71,337.27 996085247 24-Feb-2000 71,337.27 B 0.00 07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Erecu!!ve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 'is PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,337.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2000 -71,337.27 996085247 24-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 24-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -694,776.44 233SEODAI 04/102000 24-Feb-2000 694,776.44 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -694,776.44 233SEODAI 04/102000 24-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED[NCO 24-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -3,589.632.00 02225ACEO 03/142000 25-Feb-2000 3,589,632.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 24-Feb-2000 -3,589,632.00 02225ACEO 03/14/2000 25-Feb-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,507.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 25,507.11 996085247 25-Feb-2000 25,507.11 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,507.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 -25,507.11 996085247 25-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Eeecutive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY H) TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 -1,999.073.33 313384TRO MAT022812000 25-Feb-2000 1,999,073.33 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 -1,999,073.33 313384TRO MAT02282000 25-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00 99366W 133 05.560%02282000 DD 02/;5/ 25-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00 99366W133 05.560%02/282000 DO 02251 25-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,729,418.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -3,729,418.27 996085247 28-Feb-2000 3,729,418.27 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,729,418.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -3,729,418.27 996085247 28-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,961.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 -21,961.81 996085247 28-Feb-2000 21,961.81 B 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,961.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2000 .21,961.91 996085247 28-Feb-2000 0.00 PC - 28-1`eb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 2&Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00 99366W687 05.650%02292000 DO 02/281 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 28-Feb-2000 63,500,000.00 99366W687 03.650%02292000 DO 02291 2&Feb-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 28-F64000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 -3,799,403.61 313394TSB MAT 02292000 28-F6-2000 3,799,403.61 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 -3.799,403.61 313384M MAT 02292000 28-Feb-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 258,457.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 -258,457.01 996095247 29-F6-2000 258,457.01 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 258,457.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 -258,457.01 996085247 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00 07-M.,2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY N TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 -3,799,396.22 313384TT6 MAT 03/01/2000 29-Feb-2000 3,799,396.22 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 -3.799,396.22 313384TT6 MAT 03/012000 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 -1,288,261.00 313396WA7 MAT 04252000 INCOME AT MAT 29-Feb-2000 1,288,261.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 -1,289,761.00 313396WA7 MAT 0425/2000 INCOME AT MAT 29-Feb-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-Feb-2000 -6,907,755.56 36959HEK9 05/192000 29-Feb-2000 6,907,755.56 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-Feb-2000 ` -6,907,755.56 3695914EK9 05/19/2000 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CDR 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 29-Feb-2000 -56,500,000.00 99366Y204 05.600%03/012000 DO 02291 29-Feb-2000 56,500,000.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 79 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 29-Feb-2000 -56,500,000.00 99366Y204 05.600%03/012000 DO 0229/ 29-Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Jon-2000 .5,609,375.00 OIND60627 6.000%021152029 22-Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Feb-2000 &00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 11-1en-2000 .9,732,187.50 OIN062623 6.5009A 02/222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 11-Jen-2000 -10,202,500.00 OIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Jon-2000 -713,346.89 111`011628 VAR RT 02252029 23-Feb-2000 - 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 21-Jon-2000 -899,550.00 3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DO 02/01/0 01-Feb-2000 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 01-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 24-Jen-2000 -2,800,000.00 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 28-Feb-2000 2,800,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-M.,2000 8:57.19 Esecull.Wo kbexF Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCED-CONSOMDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST! TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 24-3m-2000 .5,898-67 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 28-Feb-2000 0.00 111 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 ONMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 244m.2000 -2,905,998.67 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 28-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NV 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 -2,376,392.50 9128275N8 06.000%09/15/2009 DD 08/1S/ 15-May-2000 2,376,392.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 -37,087.91 9128275N8 06.000%08/15/2009 DD 08/151 15-May-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-1000 -2,397.990.62 9128275N8 06.000%08/15/20D9 DO 09/151 02-Feb-2000 2,387,890.62 R LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 69,701.09 9128275N8 06.000%0 911 51200 9 DD 0811 S/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.0D LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-20D0 -2,457,591.71 9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/15/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00 ._ .. ....... ...v.ro Executive Warkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE II PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000I0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 -9,699,375.00 OIN062631 6.500%03/152029 22-Mar-2000 9,699,375.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO I I,0W,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 .10.161,250.00 OIN062631 6.500%03/152029 22-Mu-2000 10,161,250.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -4,316,057.20 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 04-Feb-2000 4,316,057.20 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -51,793.27 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 04-Feb-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,900,000.00 U STREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 -4,367,950.47 9128274VI 04.750%11/152009 DD 111151 04-Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DESS 03-Feb-2000 .2,013,100.00 31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010DD 1/1420 04-Feb-2000 2,013,100.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 03-Feb-2000 -8,055.56 31359MFG3 7.250%01/15201ODD 111420 04-Feb-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 -- •• ,nnn 9.17.10 Fsecullvs Wmkbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 03-Feb-2000 -2,021,155.56 31359MFG3 7.2500/*01/15/2010 DO 1/14/20 04-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,392,187.50 9128275NR 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/15/ 09-Feb-2000 2,392,197.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-Feb-2000 -72,554.35 9128275NS 06.000%09/152009 DO 081151 09-Feb-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,464,741.95 9128275N8 06.0000/09/152009 DO 09/15/ 09-1`eb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,445,187.50 9128274VI 04.750%11/152008DD 11/15/ 09-Feb-2000 2,445,187.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 31,423.03 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DO 111151 09-Feb-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 -2,476,610.58 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 111151 09-Feb-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FED-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 -5,593,750.00 OIN060635 6.000%03/152029 22-Mer-2000 5,593,730.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,811.80 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 18-Feb-2000 -332,504.51 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012029 DD 121011 24-Feb2000 332,504.51 B AMHERST,HOUSTON 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,911.80 FHLMC GROUP 878.6o64 18-Feb-2000 .1,381.78 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/011 24-Feb-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,911.80 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 I9-Feb-2000 -333,886.29 31348SWZ3 6.394%01/012028 DD 12/011 24-Feb-2000 0.00 PC AMHERST,HOUSTON 24-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 -2,008,440.00 31359MEYS 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/0119 23-Feb-2000 2,008,440.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,160,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 66.470,83 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/01/9 23-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 -2,074,910.83 31359MEY5 6.625%09/15/2009 DD 09/01/9 23-Feb-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Feb-2000 0.00 Execmi• 'i'�rkbench PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST, TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-Feb-2000 -24,837,890.63 912827Z62 06.50016 10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-M4e-2000 24,837,890.63 B MORGAN STANLEY A.CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-Feb-2000 -612,704.92 912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DERS 29-Feb-2000 -2.994,300.00 209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 0620/ 02-Mar-2000 2,994,300.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DESS 29-Feb-2000 -40,178.13 209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 06201 02-Ma-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jm-2000 -20.00 9128275WS 4.2500/"1/152010 DO 011151 15-Jm-2000 20.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jm-2000 -20.00 9129275WS 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 154m-2000 0.00 PC 29-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8.57:19 Eeecatiw Wo kbewh Q _ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLOATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -200.00 9128272M3 3.375%01//52007 DO 01/151 15-Jan-2000 200.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-JM-2000 .200.00 9128272M3 3375%OVI52007 DO 011151 15-Ian-2000 0.00 FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 140.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jaa-2000 .140.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jaa-2000 140.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 140.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -140.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 15-Jan-2000 0.00 FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb.2000 -22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Feb-2000 22.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 -22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,932.80 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Feb-2000 -11,932.80 3133117A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 1110119 01-Feb-2000 11,932.80 PU 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8.57.19 Eucaflw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOIJDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADULOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,932.90 FHL AC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb-2000 -11,932.90 3133T17A4 6.0 0 09 6 1 1/1 5/2 02 3 DD 11/0119 01-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 SALES CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,585,831.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44 996095247 03-Feb-2000 -2,595,831.44 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,585,831.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 2,585,831.44 996095247 03-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -80,065.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 $0.065.48 996085247 03-Feb-2000 -80,065.48 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -90,065.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 90,065.49 996095247 03-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 890,448.00 341IOAB93 02/092000 03-Feb-2000 -990,448.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Eeeculiw Hwibeec8 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 8,689.50 341 IOAB93 02/092000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 03-Feb-2000 899,137.50 341 IOAB93 02/09/2000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 2,485,301.39 313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 -2,495,301.39 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 11,961.80 313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2.500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2000 2,497,263.19 313588SX4 02/102000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 697,861.11 313396SV6 MAT 02/082000 03-Feb-2000 697,961.11 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 1,592.50 313396SV6 MAT 02/082000 03-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Marv2000 8.57,19 Executive Wwkbmh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOGIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAU%OSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 04-Feb-2000 1,745.33 313396UP6 MAT 0321/2000 04-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PRACO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTO MTO CORP DI 04-Feb-2000 4,367,953.33 313396UP6 MAT 0321/2000 04-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO -2,298,498.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2000 2,298,498.67 996085247 07-Feb-2000 -2,298,498.67 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,298,498.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2000 2,298,499.67 996085247 07-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 07-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Feb-2000 2,300RW.00 99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/071 08-Feb-2000 -2,300,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Feb-2000 358.42 99366F650 05.610Hv 02/082000 DD 02/07/ 08-Feb-2000 0.00 Is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Feb-2000 2,300,35SA2 99366F650 05.610%02/082000 DO 02/07/ 08-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0&Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Executive a'wkbew6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,093.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 53,093.39 996085247 16-Feb-2000 -53,093.38 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,093.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2000 53,093.38 996085247 I&Feb-2000 0.00 FC 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,454,538.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2000 1,454,538.44 996085247 2346-2000 -1,454,539.44 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,454,538.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2000 1,454,539.44 996085247 23-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 23-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .65,536.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 65,536.33 996095247 25-Feb.2000 -65,536.33 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .65,536.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2000 65,536.33 996085247 25-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb.2000 63,500,000.00 99366WI33 05.560%02282000 DO 02251 28-Feb-2000 -63.500,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Mar2000 8:57:19 Lwww W.,.,nch Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb-2000 29,421.67 99366W 133 05.560%0228/2000 DD 02251 28-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -63,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Feb-2000 63,529,421.67 99366W I33 05.560%02292000 DD 02251 28-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC.NEW YORK 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 2,787,695.55 313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 28-Feb-2000 -2,787,695.55 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 9,788.89 313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 28-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Feb-2000 2796,484.44 313396TZ6 MAT 03/07/2000 28-Feb-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,858,584.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 3,858,584.64 996085247 29-Feb-2000 -3,958,584.64 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,858,584.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Feb-2000 3,859,534.64 996095247 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 29-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57.19 am.,iw ww4i7eaah Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00o/o000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 63,300,000.00 99366W687 05.650%02/29/2000 DO 0228/ 29-Feb-2000 -63,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 9,965.97 99366W687 05.650%02292000 DD 02281 29-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FST REPO 29-Feb-2000 63,509,965.97 99366W687 05.650%02292000 DO 0228/ 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FROST BOSTON C 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 28-Jee-2000 708.100.00 11F011628 VAR RT 02/252029 23-Feb-2000 0.00 FC OOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,389,062.50 9128275NB 06,000%08/152009 DD 08/151 '02-Feb-2000 -2,379,202.17 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 9,860.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01.Feb-2000 69,701.09 9128275NS 06.000%09/15/2009 DO 08/151 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,458,763.59 9128275NS 06.000%09/152009 DD 005/ 02-F6-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar2000 8.57.19 Exe ww,Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,442,487.60 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 111151 02-Feb-2000 -2.429,218.75 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13,269.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 29,865.38 9129274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 11/151 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-Feb-2000 2,471,352.98 9128274V I 04.750%I1/152008 DO 111151 02-Feb-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10.500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 9,712,500.00 OIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 .9,735,545.06 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -23,045.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 9,71L500.00 DIN062623 6.500%02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 02-Feh4000 10,175,000.00 OIN062623 6.500%0227J2030 22-Feb-2000 -10,199,142.44 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -24,142.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 10,175,000.00 OIN062623 6.5001A 02222030 22-Feb-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00 &eculiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,160,625.00 9128275NS 06.000%08/15/2009 DD 08/151 04-Feb-2000 -1,142,017.04 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 18,607.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 33,847.83 9128275N8 06,000%0 811 5/2 0 0 9 DO O8/151 04-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,194,472.93 9128275N8 06.0001.08/15/20D9 DO 08/15/ 04-Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 1,944,373.00 9128275NS 06.000%09/15/2009 DO 08/151 04-Feb-2000 -1,903.361.74 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 41,013.26 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 56,413.04 9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DO 091151 04-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Feb-2000 2,000,798.04 9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DD 081151 04-Fcb-200D 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 2,391,406.25 9128275N8 06.000%08/152009 DD 09115/ 09-Feb-2000 -2,379,202.17 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12,204.08 07-Ma 2000 8:57d9 Ereculroe Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 72,554.35 9128275N8 06-000%08/152009 DO 08/151 09-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb0000 2,463,960.60 9128275N8 06.000%08/132009 DO 091151 09-1`64000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES' 09-Feb-2000 2,380,110.00 9128275N8 06.000%081152009 DO 08115/ 15-May-2000 -2,392,187.50 S LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY -12,077.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Feb-2000 37,087.91 912827SNB 06.000%08/152009 DO 08/1S/ 15-May-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 5,600,341.80 OIN060627 6.000°A02/152029 22-Feb-2000 -5,609,375.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -9,033.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 ' 5,600,341.80 OIN060627 6.000%02/15/2029 22-Feb-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DE13S 22-Feb-2000 2,003,437.50 31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1114/20 23-Feb-2000 -2,013,100.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -9,662.50 Eee:w .e Warkbnteh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION RISTRICT PAGE. -36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOWDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb-2000 15,708.33 31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1/14/20 23-Feb-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Feb 2000 2,019,145.83 31359MFG3 7.250%01/152010 DO 1114/20 21-Feb-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Feb-2000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52,499.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Jen-2000 -52,499.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Jan-2000 52,556.92 PDC 57.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Jan-2000 52,522.00 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-1en-2000 -52,579.44 PD -57.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Jan-2000 52,522.00 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Ja0-2000 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,973.05 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Feb-2000 39,873.05 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -40,496.07 PD -623.02 07-16 r2000 8:57:19 Fttculfw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FER-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,873.05 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Feb-2000 39,973.05 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02101/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2000 38,194.95 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 38,141.24 PI) 53.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2000 38,194.95 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,929.60 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2000 32,928.60 36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -33,473.99 PD -545.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,928.60 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2000 32,929.60 36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .34,299.89 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Feb-2000 34,299.89 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 0610IN 01-Feb-2000 -35,050.20 PD -750.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34.299.89 GNMA II POOL N080088M 01-Feb-2000 34,299.89 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/202027 DO 06/0119 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 22-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Executive Wo kbnmb Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG06010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .7,934.60 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Feb-2000 7,934.60 31371HU48 6.500%09/01/2006 DO 08/01/ 01-Feb-2000 -7,769.71 PD 164.89 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,934.60 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Feb-2000 7,934.60 31371HU49 6.500%09/01/2006DD08N1/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46053.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 46,853.50 3133TCE95 6.3240/a08/15/2032 01-Feb-2000 46,904.74 PD -51.24 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -558.90 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Feb-2000 558.80 302998GE3 7.500%IVOM030 DO 1021/9 01-Feb-2000 -546.66 PD 12.14 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 16,231.80 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 -16,231.30 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 16,231.80 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,822.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 7,822.09 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1" 15-Feb-2000 -7,822.09 PD 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57:19 Executive Workbench Q RANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSLI-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY B3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,822.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 7,822.09 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2000 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 01-Feb-2000 899,447.00 59018JBII 02/012000 01-Feb-2000 -899,447.00 MT 01-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 9,459,139.44 313396SP9 MAT 02/022000 02-Feb-2000 .9,459,139.44 MT 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 3,697,194.17 313384SP5 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 -3,697,194.17 MT 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -503,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 501,430.56 313396SQ7 02/032000 03-Feb-2000 501,430.56 MT 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 CBA(DELAWARE)DISC 07-Feb-2000 1,195,025.33 124783B70 02/072000 07-Feb-2000 -1,195,025.33 MT 07-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Ma 2000 8:57:19 Ewcullve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: vo PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Feb-2000 1,196,529.33 313312SV3 MAT 02/082000 08-Feb-2000 -1,196,529.33 MT 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,700,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 7,624,155.00 4592ODB85 02/092000 08-Feb-2000 -7,624,155.00 MT 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 10,579,743.89 36959HB97 02/092000 09-Feb-2000 -10,579,743.89 MT 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-Feb-2000 890,636.50 36959HBE6 02/142000 14-Feb-2000 -990,636.50 MT 14-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Feb-2000 1,198,498.67 313396TC7 MAT 02/152000 15-Feb-2000 -1,198,498.67 MT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 13,953,858.33 98412CBG3 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 -13,953,858.33 MT 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 3,691,945.39 313384TDI MAT 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 -3,691,845.39 MT 16-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8.57.19 Evemll a Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY HJ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 3,699,437.81 313384TE9 MATOV17/2000 17-Feb-2000 -3,699,437.91 MT 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 ANZ DELAWARE INC DISC 17-Fcb-2000 597,728.00 0019]RBH3 02/17/2000 17-Fcb-2000 -597,728.00 MT 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900.000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 18-Feb-2000 897,390.00 02225ABJO 02/182000 18-Feb-2000 -897,390.00 MT 18-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 18-Feb-2000 1,699,738.39 313384TF6 MAT 02/1 8 2 0 0 0 INCOME AT MAT I8-Feb-2000 -1,699,738.39 MT I8-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-Feb-2000 1,086,844.00 63743CBQ5 02/24/2000 24-Feb-2000 -1,086,844.00 MT 24-Feb-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Feb-2000 3,486,048.61 63743CBR3 02/252000 25-Feb-2000 -3,486,048.61 MT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2.000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 1,997,493.33 313384TN9 MAT 02252000 25-Feb-2000 -1,997,493.33 MT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Marv2000 8:57.19 Executive JV kbenc/ Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/poop 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 3,696,428.89 313384TRO MAT0226/2000 28-Feb-2000 -3,696,428.89 MT 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 1,294,667.11 313396TS2 MAT 02292000 29-1`eb-2000 -1,294,667.11 MT 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 29-Feb-2000 3,799,403.61 313394TSB MAT 02292000 29-Feb-2000 -3,799,403.61 MT 29-Feb-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Feb-2000 9,000,000.00 718154BB2 9.250%02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 -9,903,780.00 MT 15-Feb-2000 -903,780.00 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Feb-2000 0.40 9%087094 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 01-Feb-2000 553.00 59018JBII 02/012000 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar1000 8:57:I9 aecul1w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-Feb-2000 2,805.83 313384SP5 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 02-Feb-2000 40,860.56 313396SP9 MAT 02/02/2000 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM MTN SR 800570 02-Feb-2000 16,240.56 4418IKZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/ 02-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 02-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 7,323.77 996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2000 1,239.38 996085247 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 503,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Feb-2000 1,569.44 313396SQI 02/03/2000 03.Feb-2000 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 CBA(DELAWARE)DISC 07-Feb-2000 4,974.67 12478JB70 02/07/2000 07-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 07-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Erecutim Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Feb-2000 3,470.67 313312SV3 MAT 02/08/2000 08-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 08-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,700,000.00 IBM DISC 08-Feb-2000 75,845.00 4592ODB95 02/0&2000 08-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Feb-2000 120,256.11 36959141197 02/09/2000 09-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 09-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 11-Feb-2000 31,161.18 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DO 051111 11-Feb-2000 0.00 IT II-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 14-Feb-2000 31,319.17 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 13-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-Feb-2000 ' 9,363.50 36959HBE6 02/14/2000 14-Feb-2000 0.00 IT I4-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 002 15-Feb-2000 12,800.00 52517PLMI 6.400%08/302000 DD 0926/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mw2000 8:57.19 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF 2146 QT 15-Feb-2000 12,500.00 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,600,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Feb-2000 600,000.00 912810DL9 12.500%08/152014 DO 091151 15-Feb-2000 0.00 1T 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Feb-2000 99,450.00 81240QJAI 6.630%07/09/2002 DD 07/09/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Feb-2000 416,250.00 7181540B2 9.250%02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 15-Feb-2000 1,501.33 313396TC7 MAT 02/15/2000 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,873.05 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 15-Feb-2000 52,140.72 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 38.194.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-Feb-2000 2,619.49 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mm-2000 8.57.19 Exeeutfe Wvkbemeh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52,522.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2000 15,952.33 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Jam2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2000 22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Je0-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,231.80 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2000 2,208.99 3935052Y7 6.290°A 10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,932.80 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 15-Feb-2000 11,932.80 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,922.09 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2000 312.31 31677EAA4 6.200°A 09/012001 DD 03/15/9 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 16-Feb-2000 46,141.67 98412CBG3 02/162000 16-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Feb-2000 8,154.61 313384TDI MAT 02/16/2000 16-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Eseeulfve Wmkbeaeh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIKILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN#TR006 16-Feb-2000 16,176.79 17120QERO FLTG RT 08/092002 DD 04/08/ 15-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 16-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 ANZ DELAWARE INC DISC 17-Feb-2000 2,272.00 00181RBH3 02/172000 17-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Feb-2000 562.19 313384TE9 MAT 02/17/2000 17-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 17-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-Feb-2000 62,286.76 370425QV5 FLTG RT 0911 9/2 0 0 3 DO 08/17/ 18-Feb-2000 0.00 IT I&Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 18-Feb-2000 4,820.07 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/182000 DO 051181 18-Feb-2000 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC I8-Feb-2000 ' 2,610.00 02225AB30 02/182000 18-Feb.2000 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC I8-Feb-2000 261.61 313384776 MAT 02/182000 INCOME AT MAT 18-Feb-2000 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57.19 Ereculf a Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: a8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOWDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 22-Feb-2000 11,666.67 3837H3C70 7.000%12202022 01-Feb2000 0.00 IT 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,928.60 GNMA II POOL 90090023 22-Feb-2000 9,200.63 36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 22-F64000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,299.89 GNMA lI POOL 9080088M 22-Feb-2000 10,850.41 36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 DO 0"1/9 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 22-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-Feb-2000 13,156.00 63743CBQ5 02242000 24-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 24-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Feb-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 25-Ju-2000 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Feb•2000 13,951.39 63743CBR3 0225/2000 25-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Feb-2000 2,506.67 313384TN9 MAT 02252000 25-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar-2000 8:57:19 Eeecult.Workbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,934.60 FNMA POOL80252703 25-Feb-2000 5,327.74 31371HU48 6.500%09/012006DDOS/01/ 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 28-Feb-2000 31,376.04 345397SCS FLTG RT 08272006 DO 0827/ 27-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-Feb-2000 3,571.11 313384TRO MAT02282000 28-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-Feb-2000 156,250.00 9128272L5 06.2501Y.0212WO02 DD 0228/ 28-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Feb-2000 5.332.89 313396TS2 MAT 02/292000 29-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 ' 20.00 9129275WS 4.250Ye001/152010 DD 011151 0.00 CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 200.00 9128272M3 3,375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Mar2000 8:57:19 Encullm Wwkbeneh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT j PAGE: '50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-FEB-2000-29-FEB-2000 OCSD-COWSOLnurED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPf1OM SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Feb-2000 140.00 9128273A8 3.625%01/152002 DD 07/15/ 0.00 CD 29-Feb-2000 0.00 07-Ma,2000 8:57:19 &se W ve 11':,"A ch FAHR COMMITTEE m-brg a Toad. 03/0B/00 03/22/00 AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation Distritr _ ANCm-a iH FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1999 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) �aEmV aul,vyagNn3ObaneFAXFFalY20.roVAar'Auanerylnhp,W pp,lpJOp.px Ae":ea. Page 1 T ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are four comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of September 30, 1999, and December 31, 1999. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period October 1 through December 31, 1999. Portfolio Pedom ance Summary Quarter Ended December 31,1999 Liquid Opem6ng Monies Long-Teem Operating Monies(%) Total Rate Towl Rate o of Realm eendunadcol Resort Bendmark" 3Menms 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.4 Ns 2.T 2. 1.8 1. Months 3.9 3.8 1.9 7. 12 Months 5.1 a.7 2.3 22 nce Inception 30 Sept 95 1 5.5 1 5.1 6.1 5. Market Value per PI Mco 30 Sept.99 $19.6M 282.9M Averege Quality 'AA+- 'AAA' current Yield(%) 5.53 6.20 Estimated Yield to Mawnty(%) 6.02 6.63 Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) -Flo.0M Estimated Annual Income 1.1M 17.6 (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt 1-5 Year Bond Index Market Recap Interest rates moved higher in the fourth quarter of 1999, capping the worst year in the bond market since 1994, as investors remained concerned that the Federal Reserve would, again, boost interest rates to prevent the economy from overheating. w 11+r..e aaunV maa�evurmrarlmoowanwaneny�.ngmnmmoaao eoc s-•r v-. +�sse Page 2 T Y The full year of 1999 was a difficult one for fixed income investors, with U.S. interest rates rising as much as 180 basis points for some maturities. At their November 16 meeting, the Federal Reserve raised the Fed funds rate by 25 basis points, from 5.25% to 5.50%, the third such increase during 1999. The Fed left rates unchanged in December due to market uncertainties surrounding Y2K. Rates rose across the entire Treasury yield curve, driven largely by the belief of investors that the Fed would raise interest rates. As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the Historical Yield Curve, the yield on the 30-year Treasury benchmark jumped 43 basis points, closing the fourth quarter at 6.48% when compared to the end of the third quarter 1999 at 6.05%. Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds ended the quarter at 6.40%, a climb of 52 basis points from the end of the third quarter(5.88%). Shorter rates showed similar significant increases. The 3-month Treasury rate increased by 47 basis points (from 4.85% to 5.32%); the 6-month rate jumped a full 78 basis points (from 4.95 % to 5.73%); and the 1-year rate rose 79 basis points (from 5.18% to 5.97%). For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted maturity or duration slightly below the duration index (2.13 vs. 2.32 years), emphasizing holdings in mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporate notes, and real return bonds. The performance of the portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 23 basis points for the fourth quarter (0.64% vs. 0.41%). For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO continued to use an "at index" duration (approximately 58 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing high-quality corporate securities and commercial paper. This added returns to the portfolio, which outperformed its benchmark by 12 basis points for the fourth quarter(1.37% vs. 1.25%). Market Outlook Forecasts from PIMCO report that economic growth will remain solid, but will show modest slowing over the next nine months. Growth is likely to be stronger in the first half of 2000 as widespread Y2K disruptions have not materialized, and strong stock and housing markets will support higher levels of consumer spending. PIMCO expects the Fed will tighten the federal funds rate at least once during the first half of 2000 to cool the economy. Thus, inflation is expected to remain benign over the longer term. The PIMCO investment strategy targets portfolio duration slightly above index to take advantage of higher yields provided by longer maturity securities. PIMCO indicates that they will continue to hold short and intermediate maturity real return bonds; concentrate on higher quality investment-grade corporate holdings; and emphasize adjustable-rate mortgages to capture higher relative yields. rv.amw�ei�',m.avwmziwaa"evnHmrenaoowneiwuen«Mmnne�now��m.ax Page 3 w >v The attached letter from PIMCO provides a more detailed description of fourth- quarter market conditions, portfolio returns, future market outlook, and their recommended investment strategy for the District's Liquid and Long-Term Operating Monies portfolios. Portfolio Market Values On December 17, 1999, the sum of$10 million was received from the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle, and was deposited in the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Tenn Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies($M) Monies($M) 31 Dec.98 18.6 304.5 31 March 99 18.8 305.8 30 June 99 19.0 305.9 30 Sa L 99 19.3 271.1 31 Dec.99 19.ii 282.9 ALTERNATIVES NIA CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Four Comparative Bar Charts 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph 6. PIMCO Letter dated February 3, 2000 SVK:IC o-aamuwlwy aumumeenerrwmraxaromuanamnemM�+nw urwaaoc "8Ne0 1,61' Page 4 Prepared by Finance, 02116/2000. 10:54 AM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 iii � ..• •.. iii iii ... - ♦.♦ •.♦ iii _. iii $150,000,000 ... ..• ... ... . , ... ......... .N ♦.♦ ♦.♦ ' iii iii $100,000,000 ��� ` �+� ... — iii iii iii ': ..._ iii .;._.�- •.• $50,000,000 iii ... $0 ♦.♦ ♦.♦ ... iii iii 1 31 Dec 98 31 Mar 99 30 Jun 99 30 Sep 99 31 Dec 99 El Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies G:\exmi.dta\fin\2220\geggi\FinanceUnvestmgmtprogram c Prepared by Finance, 0211612000, 10:43 AM OCSD Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification loo ,00 100 90 80 70 06 60 ❑ 9/30/99 50 ® 12/31/99 40 a 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dta\0n\2220\geggi\Finanoe\Portlollo short term Prepared by Finance, 02/16/2000, 10A4 AM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 90 80 70 60 ❑ 9/30/99 c 50 ® 12/31/99 40 ao ao 3436 30 20 1211 10 00 00 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dtaNln'22201geggnFlnancetPortfolio long tens graph s Prepamd by Finance, 02/1612000, 10:45 AM OCSD Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 -- 70 60 .. ❑ 9/30/99 50 43 43 ® 12/31/99 a 40 33 3 30 21 20 20 10 3 3 0 F----VZ" P/ — A1/P1 AAA AA A G:\excel.dta\fin12220�geggi%FinancelPortfolio short term Prepared by Finance, 02/16/2000, 10:47 AM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 70 60 ❑ 9/30/99 50 ® 12/31 /99 40 a 30 20 18 19 21 20 10 0 A1/P1 AAA AA A G:lexcel.dtaNnt2220�gegghFinancetPortfolio long term graph o Prepared by Finance, 02fl&2000, 10:51 AM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 7.00 6.75 6.50 6.25 6.00 x 5.75 W 5.50 5.25 5.00 4.76 4.50 4.25 4.00 E E M to N M O N A O N M 30.1un-99 —6-30-Sep_99 t31-Dec-99 G:\excel.dtakfin\222OVeggi\Finance\HistodcarrREASURYyieldcurve PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY • 840 Newport Center Drive 300 February 3, 2000 'b ry N Nmv ewport Beach G92660 Tel %9.720.6000 PAY:949,720.1376 Mr. Steve Kozak Finance Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Fourth Quarter Report Dear Steve: What follows is a description of events in the bond markets during the 4th Quarter 1999 and an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. I have also included a section on strategies to be pursued in your portfolio during the coming months. Bond Market Recan: Rates Move Higher in Final Quarter, Capping Difficult Year Interest rates moved higher in the fourth quarter, capping the worst year in the bond market since 1994, as investors anticipated that more Federal Reserve tightening would be needed to prevent the economy from overheating. The yield on the 30-year Treasury closed at 6.48 percent, up 43 basis points, while shorter-term rates rose 40 to 80 basis points. The full year 1999 was a difficult one for bond investors, with U.S. interest rates rising as much as 180 basis points for some maturities. This increase came as robust economic expansion in the U.S. and accelerating growth in Europe and Asia boosted demand for capital worldwide and caused inflation to rise from lows reached in the previous year. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.5 percent on November 16, the third such increase this year. The Central Bank has now taken back all three of its rate cuts from last year, when market participants were preoccupied with the threat of global deflation and reduced liquidity in financial markets. The Fed left rates unchanged in December because of market uncertainties surrounding Y2K. Still, investors remained concerned that the combination of rapid growth and a dwindling pool of workers would increase wage pressures and force the Fed to tighten further in 2000. An upward revision of third quarter growth to 5.7 percent — the fastest pace in almost a year — as well as surging consumer confidence heading into the holiday season did nothing to ease those concerns. Even so, there were signs that higher interest rates had begun to moderate the Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Two Bond Market Recan: (Continued) expansion. Investment in new housing fell and mortgage refinancings continued to decline as mortgage rates hovered near 8 percent. Moreover, actual inflation remained relatively subdued, held in check by productivity gains and intense price competition in industries such as autos and apparel. Higher Yielding Sectors Outperform for Quarter and Year Managers who focused on higher yielding bonds amid general market weakness were rewarded, as these securities outpaced Treasuries for the fourth quarter and all of 1999. Bonds that offered the most attractive yields - emerging markets and non-investment grade corporates - performed best. The following summarizes relative sector performance during the fourth quarter: • Mortgages outperformed as yield premiums narrowed in the face of declining market volatility. Higher mortgage rates meant that more than 80 percent of the mortgage market was priced at a discount, substantially reducing prepayment risk. • Corporate bonds - both investment and non-investment grade - benefited from the strong economy, which helped companies post better-than-expected profits and mitigated concern about rising default rates. Slower new issuance also supported the corporate market. • Emerging market credits performed well, as more balanced worldwide economic growth and higher commodity prices improved prospects for exports in many countries. • Currency-hedged European and Japanese bonds outperformed Treasuries because the pace of economic growth, and hence inflation expectations, in these countries lagged the U.S. The Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government/Corporate experienced a return of 0.41 percent. Returns by sector were as follows: Sector Total Monthly return Treasury 0.27% Agency 0.56% Corporates 0.24% Performance Attribution: Long Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 0.64 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Three s Performance Attribution. (Continued) Government Corporate Index by 23 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Maintaining a below-index duration positively impacted returns as interest rates rose. • Our broader-than-index maturity structure was modestly positive as the yield curve flattened. • Mortgages enhanced returns due to reduced price volatility and attractive yield premiums. • Investment-grade corporates aided performance as yield premiums narrowed due to strong growth and reduced issuance. • Real return bonds outperformed as real yields increased less than comparable nominal Treasury yields. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 1.37 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill - Index by 12 basis point. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Our index like portfolio duration was neutral for the quarter. • Investment-grade corporates, especially higher yielding issues, enhanced performance as credit spreads narrowed amid strong growth and a reduction in new issuance. I"Ouarter 2000 Outlook: Economic Growth To Slow Modestly But Remain Solid U.S. economic growth will slow modestly over the next nine months but remain solid. Growth is likely to be stronger in the first half of 2000 as widespread Y2K disruptions have not materialized and strong stock and housing markets will support high levels of consumer spending. Resurgent economies in Europe and Asia will help sustain growth by absorbing more U.S. exports. However, several factors threaten to slow growth in the second half of the year, including the following: Non-U.S. investors, who enjoy increasingly attractive investment opportunities elsewhere in the world, could require higher U.S. interest rates to continue financing the widening U.S. trade deficit. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Four t 190uarter 2000 Outlook: (Continued) Consumers could begin to moderate their spending if the surging equity market cools off, thereby reversing the recent trend of a declining savings rate. Inflation Will Trend Upward But Remain Relatively Benign Inflation increased modestly in recent months as deflationary forces such as falling commodity prices and a strong dollar began to reverse themselves. Inflation will continue to trend upward for the following reasons: • Economic growth will reduce the supply of available workers and heighten the risk of accelerating wage increases. • Import prices will rise because capital outflows to faster growing economies will weaken the U.S. dollar. • Stronger economies in Europe and Asia have led to rising commodity prices, the effects of which will continue to work their way through the economy. While there will be upward pressure on interest rates in response to higher inflation, rates are unlikely to move far above the top of our secular range because inflation will remain relatively benign. Several factors will help contain increases in inflation. First, we expect that the Fed will tighten at least once during the first half of 2000 to cool the economy. In addition, strong productivity gains will hold down increases in unit labor costs, while relatively low capacity utilization will limit producers' ability to pass on wage increases. Yield Enhancement Will Remain Key to Outperformance Yield enhancement will continue to offer better opportunities for outperformance than interest rate strategies in a low- volatility rate environment. Collecting premium income from writing options is one way to take advantage of range-bound rates; mortgages, which offer yield premiums well above Treasuries at a time when refinancing risk is low, are another. Corporate and emerging market bonds also offer attractive yield premiums but, unlike mortgages, present credit risk. In these sectors, investors will need to focus on issues with the highest risk-adjusted yields given lingering concerns about high levels of corporate debt, rising default rates and fiscal imbalances in some emerging market countries. U.S. real yields remain higher than in most other developed economies, giving portfolio managers little reason to venture outside the U.S. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Mr. Steve Kozak February 3, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Five a StratePy: The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Long Term portfolio in the coming months: • Target duration slightly above the benchmark to take advantage of higher yields on longer- maturity securities. • Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the yield curve. • Concentrate investment-grade corporate holdings on higher quality credits. • Emphasize mortgages to capture higher relative yields and shift toward higher coupon issues now that refinancing risk has diminished. • Continue to favor adjustable-rate mortgages as high yielding, short-term holdings. • Continue to hold short and intermediate maturity real return bonds to take advantage of historically high real yields. The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Liquid portfolio in the coming months: • Target duration near the half-year neutral point to capture additional yield while limiting the overall interest rate sensitivity of the portfolio. • Continue to emphasis high quality commercial paper. • Maintain exposure to select short duration corporate issues to capture relatively high yields. Steve, we hope this information proves useful, and look forward to discussing these and other issues with you in the near future. Sincerely, IT-� F. Rita J. Seymour Joseph A. Fournier Vice President Account Manager RJS/JAF:ci PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY FAHRCOMMITTEE rnreUreoM Taad.orar. 03/OB/00 03122M AGENDA REPORT I 1en RDO-23 NumW "�/2"(yp 3 FAH Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: Selection of the District's Independent Financial Auditors GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland & Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999-00 for an amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing fiscal years 2000-01 and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03 and 2003-04 upon Board approval. SUMMARY Moreland & Associates has served as the District's auditors for the past 5 years. At the direction of the Committee, staff solicited a Request For Proposal For Professional Auditing Services (RFP) for fiscal year 1999-00, with the option of auditing the following two years at staffs discretion. In addition, a two-year extension beyond this three-year contract period may be granted upon recommendation by staff and approval by the Board of Directors. The RFP was submitted to the following firms: Arthur Andersen Conrad & Associates Deloitte & Touche Diehl, Evans & Co. Ernst &Young Moreland &Associates PriceWaterhouseCoopers Thomas, Bigbie & Smith McGladrey & Pullen Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co. Arthur Andersen and Deloitte &Touche sent letters declining to propose at this time. Ernst & Young made telephone inquiries regarding the proposal but also declined to propose. All together, six responses were received. An Evaluation Team comprised of the Director of Finance, Controller, and Accounting Manager was established, and performed a preliminary evaluation ranking on these six proposals. Listed below are the results of the preliminary evaluation in the order of the ranking done by staff, followed by the first year maximum fee quoted in their proposals, and then by estimated audit hours: �.m,m��.ymW e,e•vuet�u�Rmovzwo Nam•A �uaaan a: Page 1 r Initial Evaluation Maximum Estimated Ranking By Staff Fee— 10 Yr. Audit Hours Moreland & Associates 94 $42,600 818 Conrad & Associates 89 36,865 700 Diehl, Evans & Co. 82 49,000 570 Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co. 79 43,800 570 McGladrey & Pullen 78 48,600 575 Thomas, Bigbie & Smith 77 46,300 500 The initial evaluation performed by staff was done in accordance with the criteria set forth in the RFP, without consideration of fees, as follows: 1. Past experience on comparable govemment engagements. 2. Quality of firm's professional personnel assigned to the engagement. 3. Quality of firm's management support. 4. Adequacy of proposed staffing plan. 5. Adequacy of sampling techniques. 6. The degree of anticipated support requirements of District's staff. Based on the initial screening, the Evaluation Team interviewed the top three firms: Moreland &Associates Conrad & Associates Diehl, Evans, & Co. Each of these three finalists is qualified to serve as the District's auditors. However, Moreland &Associates distinguished themselves from the rest, as follows: Assignment of Michael Moreland as the audit engagement partner. Mr. Moreland has over 20 years experience in governmental financial audits and is currently Chairman of the State Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants and of the California Committee on Municipal Accounting. In addition, Mr. Moreland was the only California CPA who was a member of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's Task Force on the development of the Financial Reporting Model, GASB Statement No 34. • Proposed the highest number of estimated hours that would be necessary to complete the audit. This coupled with the fact that Moreland &Associates was the only firm to recognize that GASB Statement 34 would have to be implemented by the District in �wmm+W any.wd•`�u•nr�w+zom.��a•n.w�vuamnn a� R•"'•° 1A° Page 2 2001-02 indicated to the Evaluation Committee that Moreland & Associates had the best understanding of the District's audit needs. • Although Conrad & Associates' maximum annual fees were lower than Moreland &Associates ($36,865 to $42,600), Moreland & Associate has the lower average hourly rate based each firms total estimated hours ($52.07 per hour to $52.66 per hour). • In anticipation of the GASB Statement No. 34 implementation in 2001-02, Moreland &Associates included an increase of$3,000 in audit fees in addition to their annual 4 percent increase. In addition, Mr. Moreland is also offering to donate up to thirty hours of his own time to assist the District in the implementation of the new reporting model. Although Conrad &Associates fees will increase each year at a nominal 3 percent, they do qualify their proposed annual fee by stating in their proposal that their fixed fee does not include changes in the scope of the audit that might result from the implementation of GASB Statement No. 34. Therefore, the Selection Committee recommends appointment of Moreland & Associates to provide audit services for the 1999-00 period. As requested in the RFP, Moreland &Associates also submitted their proposed maximum fees for the succeeding two years, as follows: 1999-00 $42,600 2000-01 44,300 2001-02 49,000 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The fees for the 1999-00 audit will be included in the Joint Works budget for 2000-01. Page 3 i MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT February 24, 2000, 4:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 4:30 p.m. on February 24, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: Director Norm Eckenrode Director Iry Pickier, Chair Director Peer Swan Director Philip L. Anthony Director Jan Debay Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alt. General Manager William Mills Jr., Alt. Staff and others in attendance were: OCSO OCWD Others Director Steve Anderson Director Wes Bannister Kellen Bum-Luchl, Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Blake Anderson Director Kelly E. Rowe Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. Bob Ghirelli Steve Conklin Stephen Thomas, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Jim Herberg Thomas M. Dawes Don Schroeder, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. David Ludwin Jill Everhart Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Bob Oolen Cindy Gehman Brenda Deeley, NCG Porter Novelli Wendy Sevenandt Jennifer Greedier Johnny Perkins, NCG Porter Novelli Michelle Tuchman Roy Hemdon Ron Linsky, NWRI Brad Hogin Clark Ide Ed Royce, MWDOC& Met Greg Leslie Michelle Boyd, City of Fountain Valley Mike Markus Dave Argo, Black&Veatch Julia Norman Andrew Lazenby, Black& Veatch Tim Sovich Bill Tappan, Carollo Engineers Mike Wehner John Collins, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley Ron Wildermuth Gary Robbins, The Orange County Register Director Pickler introduced OCSD Director/La Habra Mayor Steve Anderson who he staled will be an alternate committee member from OCSD. 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Swan and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held January 17, 2000 were approved as mailed. GWR System Minutes February 24, 2000 Page 2 of 5 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Report on Proiect Development Phase Issues: Seawater Intrusion Groundwater Computer Model OCWD Chief Hydrogeologist Roy Herndon and Stephen Thomas of Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. (CDM) gave a presentation on design information memoranda (DIM) 9a, the Seawater Intrusion Groundwater Computer Modeling. It was noted that the computer model, which will be completed in about six weeks, provides a dynamic look at the Talbert Gap under various pumping and withdrawal scenarios. 3. Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Project Manager Tom Dawes reviewed the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM, providing for recent cost containment work and changes to the scope of work. He stated that the Amendment provides for work previously authorized by the Committee: eleven changes to the scope of work, and a new completion date of December 31, 2000. The Committee then recommended the following action. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee recommended that a recommendation be made to both the OCSD and OCWD Boards to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement dated July 7, 1999 with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. adding $172,649 and providing changes to the Scope of Work, increasing the total contract price to an amount not to exceed $4,982,950. 4. Electrical Power Studies Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation for the Committee to authorize the solicitation of proposals for an electrical power study. He reported the work would cost between $30-40,000 with completion anticipated by July 2000, Mr. Dawes advised that the electrical power study will both estimate future purchased power rates and determine the feasibility of onsite power generation. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, staff was authorized to solicit proposals for the Electrical Power Studies and to return same to the Committee for final consideration. Staff was directed to include two separate scopes of work in the Request for Proposals; one for estimating future purchased power rates, and one for a provision for onsite power generation. GWR System Minutes February 24,2000 Page 3 of 5 5. Brine Effects Study Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation to issue a task order to K P. Lindstrom, Inc. to prepare the Brine Effects Study. It was noted that OCSD is doing toxicity testing at the present time, which may be sufficient for preparation of this study. Mr. Dawes stated that if sufficient OCSD toxicity test data is available, fees will not exceed $21,450 and that in the event additional toxicity evaluation is necessary, the proposal includes an allowance of$25,000 for added testing (using OCSD's vendor.) Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, issuance of a Task Order is hereby approved to K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. to prepare a Brine Effects Study at a cost not to exceed $46,540. 6. GWR System Proiect Governance Mr. Dawes gave a brief overview of the agenda report on Project Governance issues, which he stated does not recommend a form of govemance, but lists issues to be considered in choosing between an Operating Agreement and a Joint Powers Authority. He suggested that this item be reviewed by management and staff for a recommendation as to the form of governance to the Committee. Director Anthony requested that a draft operating agreement be completed before any decision is made on this issue and presented back to the Committee at a later date. Mr. Dawes responded that a draft operating agreement would be written and reviewed by the technical advisory teams and captains, the management advisory team and both general managers and presented back to the Committee. Upon motion by Director Anthony, duly seconded and carried, the Project Governance issue was referred to OCWD and OCSD management for preparation of a recommendation, and staff was directed to prepare a draft operating issues agreement. 7. Public Information Program Mr. Dawes presented staffs recommendation to reallocate $27,000 previously approved for added research and focus groups to the ongoing public information program. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the reallocation of$27,000 previously approved for research and focus groups to the ongoing public information program was approved. GWR System Minutes A February 24, 2000 Page 4 of 5 8. Status Report Brenda Deeley from NCG Porter Novelli, formerly Nelson Communications Group, reported the following: 1. Nelson Communications Group was acquired in January by Porter Novelli, whose corporate offices are in New York and is a worldwide public relations firm that will bring added resources to them. 2. The final version of this quarter's newsletter was distributed. She noted that it would be ready for mail out by the end of next week. 3. Introduction of Mary McDaniel of McDaniel Lambert who will be translating hydrology, technical, and engineering information into information for the medical community. Dick Corneille's (CDM) report included: 1. A short presentation on the cost comparison between the GWR System and West Basin Municipal Water District's "Chevron" Project showing that the bid price for the Chevron project is very comparable to the current estimate for the GWR System; and 2. Advised that 20 of the 32 DIMs are presently being worked on comprised of 10 to 60 pages each. Each DIM goes through the respective Technical Advisory Team before proceeding to the Management Advisory Team. Mr. Dawes reported that: 1. The name of the conveyance pipeline along the Santa Ana River would be called the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline. 2. OCSD would be having their quarterly workshop on Saturday, March 25 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and would be inviting OCWD Board of Directors to that workshop. The subject will be the Groundwater Replenishment System. 3. Staff has received verbal reports from both the County of Orange and the Army Corps of Engineers that the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline alignment has been preliminarily approved. 4. Staff received verbal news that the $315,000 SCE grant for the demonstration work for trickling filters/microfiltration process was denied. 9. General Managers Comments Don McIntyre requested that more directors serve in the role of alternate committee members rather than the general managers of each agency as alternates. He suggested that three alternates from each agency be selected and attend the GWR System meetings. Staff was directed to prepare an agenda item in this regard for the GWR System Minutes February 24, 2000 Page 5 of 5 next meeting. Blake Anderson suggested that each agency come with three names to the next meeting. Bill Mills said that he would be going to Washington, DC next week to seek approval of continued federal support from the Bureau of Reclamation for the project. 10.Directors Comments Director Anthony wanted to know if everything is on schedule, with Mr. Dawes confirming that it is. Director Swan asked about the AWi site, which is still under review. The Directors also requested a DIM schedule updatelstatus report. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for March 20, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebna Dale To ad.of Dir. 3/22/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe I[emN C Orange County Sanitation Distn FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Team Leader SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $172,649 for a total amount not to exceed $4,982,950. Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District have equal shares for the addendum in the amount of$86,324.50 and for the Professional Services Agreement in the total amount of $2,491,475. SUMMARY The recommended action is being forwarded to the Board of Directors from the Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on February 24, 2000. The Orange County Water District Board approved this item at their March 15, 2000 meeting. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: GWR System, J-36, Section a, Page 214) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Refer to the attached Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Agenda Report dated February 22, 2000. Page 1 i ALTERNATIVES There are no cost-effective alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS Environmental Impact Report for GW R System was certified on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal WTS.,jak GnntglabeMgenda Draft RepatWolnt BcardMR J-36 Add 1 to CDM 032200.doc »e ear Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURETO EXPENDEDTO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%) Project Development $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700.000 $ 553,345 $ 553,345 $ 400.900 72% Cesi n Staff $ 2,349.000 $ 2.349.000 $ 2,349.000 $ 2,349,000 $ 2,349,000 $ 180.000 8% Design Consultant PSAs $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 2.533,290 E 66,325 $ 2,719,615 Construction(Other) $ 2,853,900 $ 2,653,900 $ 2,653,900 $ $ Construction Staff $ 9,345,600 $ 9.345,600 $ 9,345,6001 $ $ Construction Contract $ 66,481,500 $ 66.481.500 $ 88.481,500 $ $ Contingency $ 12,895,000 $ 12,895.000 $ 12,895,000 $ $ TOTAL Ill 121.925.000 $ 121.925.000 $ - $ 121,925,000 $ 5.535,635 $ 86.325 $ 5.621,960 $ 680,900 1 10% M Nvp tlla4naVOBa A COMRACTSVdEIiIJB BUDGET TABLE 40038 for AEEmOum I,y14]014 0. Professional Services Agreement Status Report GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PHASE Total Project Budget: $121,925,000 Consultant: 7,500,000 Start Date of Project: May 1994 Date Addendum Description Cost* Accumulated Costs Provide engineering services for the Project July 15, Original Development Phase of the Groundwater 1999 PSA Replenishment System consisting of preparing desi n memoranda to the 30% design level. $ 4,810,300 Proposed 1 $ 172,649 $ 4,982,950 'The full amount of the PSA is reported. OCSD will contribute 50% of the total amount shown. 14adonXdata1%wp.dtalengU08S S CONTRACTSU-36XPSA Status Rapod.doc 02/23100 Revised 05/14/98 4 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: February 22,2000 Budgeted: N/A Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Cost Estimate: $172,649 System Cooperative Committee General Counsel Approval: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. Project Report Approved: Yes Donald F. McIntyre CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC. SUMMARY On January 17, 2000 Committee members authorized staff to negotiate Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM). The PSA, approved in July 1999, provided for the CDM Team to perform the GWR System Project Development Phase. In October 1999, the Committee received a preliminary cost estimate that indicated a higher capital cost. As a result, the Committee authorized cost containment work on November 9, 1999 and November 17, 1999. As a result of the cost containment work, the Committee approved a new project budget and scope changes on December 21, 1999. Amendment No. 1 adding $172,649 includes (1) all costs for the cost containment work, (2) engineering charges for changes, additions and deletions to the project approved by the Committee as a result of the cost containment work and (3) costs for out-of-sequence work and restart charges as a result of stopping regular work because of the cost containment work. RECOMMENDATION Recommend that the OCWD and OCSD Boards approve Amendment No. 1 adding $172,649 and providing changes to the Scope of Work, increasing the total contract price to an amount not to exceed $4,982,950. BACKGROUND As a result of higher preliminary capital cost estimates presented to the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) in October 1999, the JCC directed a series of actions to (1) provide further review of costs; (2) find ways to lower costs; and (3) stop all unrelated work on the project until a satisfactory solution to the first two was found. On November 9, 1999, the JCC requested CDM to submit a cost proposal to accomplish CDM Amendment No. 1 February 22, 2000 Page 2 of 4 these goals. The cost containment proposal, dated November 15, 1999, was approved by the JCC on November 17, 1999. The November 17 action provided the following authority and limits: • Continue in-scope, in-sequence work $179,600 • Perform in-scope, out-of-sequence work $48,900 • Perform out-of-scope work $73,600 Total $302,100 The cost containment work was completed and approved by the JCC on December 21, 1999. The new capital cost for the project is estimated at $356 million and the annual operating and maintenance charges are estimated at $21.6 million. On January 17, 2000 the JCC authorized staff to negotiate Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM to account for the cost of the cost containment work and the changes to the Scope of Work, which resulted. These costs may be grouped as follows: Item Amount • Out-of scope work $70,358 • Out-of-sequence work $47,133 • Project restart costs $69,079 • New changes to the Scope of Work 13 921 Total $172,549 Staff has negotiated these changes and recommends that the JCC recommend that the OCWD and OCSD Boards approve Amendment No. 1 adding $172,649 and Scope of Work changes to the existing contract limit of$ 4,810,301 for a new, not to exceed total of$4,982,950. There is no change in previously authorized hourly rates. DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS 1. Out-of-Scope Work This category refers only to the out-of-scope efforts for the cost containment work. On November 17, 1999, the JCC authorized $73,600 for sixteen (16) separate studies necessary to find ways to reduce project costs, all listed in the CDM November 15, 1999 proposal. The final actual cost for this work was $70,358. The cost containment work identified additional scope changes, which are discussed in detail under Item 4, below. Subtotal $70,358 CDM Amendment No. 1 February 22, 2000 Page 3 of 4 2, Out-of-Sequence Work On November 17, 1999, the JCC authorized eleven (11) separate out-of-sequence work items, with a total estimated not to exceed cost of $48,900. The actual cost of the work was $47,133. This work will have to be redone later when the Design Information Memoranda are complete. Subtotal $47,133 3. Project Restart and Schedule and Schedule Extension Costs Stopping most of the work incurs restart and project management costs. The completion date has to be extended about six (6) weeks; so added project management charges will be incurred for the longer project. a) Cost to restart project, including stop and start all subconsultants, new schedules and subconsultant scope changes: $28,400 b) Costs for schedule extension, consisting of adding project management charges for six weeks, and delay of the $100lday possible liquidated damages to after December 31, 2000. $40,679 Subtotal $69,079 4. New Changes to the Scope of Work These charges include all cost for changes to the Scope of Work as approved by the JCC on December 21, 1999. These are both cost additions and cost deletions to the project. CDM Amendment No. 1 _ February 22, 2000 Page 4 of 4 Phase I Project Development Engineering Charges Add Deduct a.) Reduction in barrier pipelines, number of wells and number of easement documents. $56.722 b.) Deletion of laboratories, WPERC facilities. (Work on architectural character and site plan rendering of AWi facilities is not deleted.) $266,719 c.) Elimination of granulated activated carbon facilities and standby power for RO and product water pump station. $24,430 d.) Additional costs for new outlet to SAR at Garfield Avenue, including piping, pumping facilities, t1V facilities and chemical facilities. A new DIM on associated technical issues will be prepared. $66,700 e.) Added costs for sound attenuation studies, now that canopies will replace buildings for certain equipment. $31,502 f.) Added costs for additional work on influent and product water plants, due to changing operating criteria. $52,320 g.) Groundwater Computer Model. In order to better phase construction the model was expanded and additional"layers' added. Added costs are: $67,778 h.) Allowance for 50% increase (from 2 to 3 per month) in formal meetings with CDM Project Director and Project Manager. $25,920 i.) Allowance for added engineering costs to protect certain facilities such as the laboratories and associated utility services,which would have been replaced. $9,980 j.) Allowance for added cost to replace gaseous chlorine to GAP treatment facilities to allow use of GWR System sodium hypochlorite system, thereby eliminating gaseous chlorine from the site. $31,795 k.) Added cost to carry forward four(4) preliminary designs (rather than two)for MF treatment to allow more bidding opportunities. $47,955 Total $333,950 $347,871 Net (deduct) ($13,921) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeb.9 Date TGad.Gr DR. 03/22/00 AGENDA REPORT em"umbe tt/4�m°e Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Lud lrector of Engineering Originator: Kathy Millea, Project Manager SUBJECT: SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve the plans and specifications for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to JW Contracting Corporation for the Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to exceed $10,428,440. SUMMARY This project is for the construction of a new solids storage and truck loading facility at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for the Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, were completed in January 2000. Carollo Engineers performed the design. The Engineers estimate is $12,500,000. On March 7, 2000, five bids were received ranging from $10,948,400 to the low bid of$10,428,440, submitted by JW Contracting Corporation. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to JW Contracting Corporation. Construction completion is scheduled for August 2002. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 199"0,Section 6, Page 10: Treatment and Disposal Projects,Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility,Job No. P2-60.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) GtnpbpMAy tla pan Rryg4UW eaaMY380-OL2a0.Oz aewea:remsa Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In February 1998, the Board of Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Carollo Engineers for the design of a solids storage and truck loading facility at Plant No. 2. The Engineer's estimate is $12,500,000 and is within the current project budget adopted for FY 1999-2000. Because the Engineers estimate is not greater than the approved construction budget, Board approval of the plans and specifications was not required prior to advertising the project for bids. Staff did, however, provide the PDC Committee with a project update in December 1999 before advertising for bids. On March 7, 2000, five bids were received ranging from $10,948,400 to the low bid of$10,428,440, submitted by JW Contracting Corporation. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to JW Contracting Corporation. Construction completion is scheduled for August 2002. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed; recommendation is to award to the lowest responsive bidder. CEQA FINDINGS Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1) Budget Information Table 2) Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3) Bid Summary KTM: G^ntglobaPAgenda D2/t Repro %Joint 8ods\P2-60-032200.dm G Nlyma�gpYLL'9 p/1 Re{vYbWll BOYEsYl�.OR3W hY n.wee:axm Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADNG FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-60 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJF_C7(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT!- `':DUDG ET ` REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET '.BUDGET INCREASE , `.BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - $ - $ - IS - $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Design Staff $ 290.000 $ 313,000 $ - $ 313.000 $ 313.000 $ - $ 313,000 $ 240.000 77% Consultant PSA $ 482.000 $ 1.115.000 $ - $ 1.115,000 $ 862.885 $ - $ 882,885 $ 726.592 82% Construction Contract $ 2,970.000 $ 12.500,000 $ $ 12.500.000 $ - $ 10.428.440 $ 10.428,440 $ 0% Construction (Other) $ 250,000 $ 340,000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 340.000 $ - $ 340,000 $ 0% Construction Staff $ 998,000 $ 1,123,600 $ $ 1,123,600 $ 1,093,150 $ - $ 1,093,150 $ 0% Contingency $ - $ 2,933.300 $ $ 2.933,300 $ - $ - 1 $ - 0% TOTAL $ 4.990.000 $ 18.324.900 $ - $ 18.324.900 '�. $ 2.629,035 $ 10,428,440 $ 13,057,475 1 $ 966,592 7% in vp dudengUors connassenidgel table MAR21)(MBoar0 Form Revised 12117911 March 7, 2000 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1,2,3, &4 BID TABULATION SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60 Engineer's Estimate: $12,500,000 Construction Contract Budget: $12,500,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. J.W. Contracting Corporation $ 10,428,440 2. Kiewit Pacific Company $ 10,488,000 3. J. F. Shea $ '10,533,434 4. Margate Construction $ 10,802,908 5. C.W. Roan $ 10,948,400 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to J.W. CONTRACTING CORP. in the bid amount of$10,428,440 as the lowest and best bid. 'Corrected amount. J.F. Shea's incorrect total was $10,533,534. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H1wp.dtatengWBS&CONTRACTST2-801P2-80 Bid Tab.dw Revised 05119198 OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60 J.W.CONTMCTING COMPANY KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY J.F.SHEA Item App—Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Pace Pace Price Price Price Pace 1 1 Lump Sum $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 35.000.00 $ 35,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 7,441,000.00 $ 7,441,000.00 $7,993,240.00 $ 7,993,240.00 $7,752,834.00 $ 7,752,834.00 3 1 Lump Sum $ 2.452.000.00 $ 2.452.000.00 $2,100.000.00 $ 2,100,000.00 $2.186.000.00 $ 2,186,000.00 4 11'800 OF $ 25.00 $ 295,000.00 $ 18.00 $ 212,400.00 $ 30.00 $ 354.000.00 5 3,020 OF $ 22.00 $ 66.440.00 $ 18.00 $ 54,360.00 $ 30.00 $ 90.600.00 6 1 Lump Sum $ 9,000.00 $ 9.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,D00.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,D00.00 7 1 Lump Sum $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000.00 $ 40.000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.D0 $ 45.000.00 Be. 1 Lump Sum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,0D0.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 8b. 1 Lump Sum $ 10.000.001 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 8c. 24 FA $ 1.000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 24.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 24.000.00 ad. 8 FA $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 86. 1 Lump Sum $ 1.000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 10,383,440.6oi $ 10,475,000.00. $`110,528,434.00 A.Total of Bid Items 1-8 Inclusive 1$-10,383;440:00i $'._10,475.000.00' $.'10,526,434.00 u are s :.. All Risk 1 Lump Sum $ 45,000.00 !$ '45,000.00 $ 13,00000 $ '. 13,000.00. $ 5,000.00 .$ 5,000.00 Lump Sum Base Bid(Total Amount A 8 e) 4 10,428.440.00- $ 10,488,000.00, :$ 10,533,434.00 Add(*)or Delete W for Alternate $ 6D0,000.00 i$:,-i G00;000:00 $ 600,000.00 $.:�,t 60b.oao+& $ 706.839.00 706;839f00 Adjusted Bid if Alternate Selected $,11,028,440.00 '$ 11',088,000.00 :$.10,538,434.00 TOTAL ADJUSTED BID :$. 10,428;44(N00J $�.`10;488,000.00' $'10.533.434.00 J.W.CONTRACTING COMPANY KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY J.F.SHEA -CddeCled amdeM J F.SM1ea's inepfeCl Iola)was 11 g,53J,5b. H kwp dialengriormvlSid D %P280 Base Bid Summary 1 Of 2 03/08/2000 BID SUMMARY Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. C.W.ROEN CONSTRUCTION CO. Item Approx Oty Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 25,000.00 S 25,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 7,837,000.00 $ 7,837,600.00 $7,992,000.00 $ 7,992,000.00 3 1 Lump Sum $ 2,500,000.DO $ 2,500,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 4 11.800 OF $ 19.40 $ 228.920.00 $ 20.00 $ 236,ODO.00 5 3,020 OF $ 19.40 S 58,588.00 $ 20.00 $ 60,400.00 6 1 Lump Sum $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 7 1 Lump Sum 3 42,800.00 S 42,800.00 $ 50.000.00 S 50,000.00 Be. 1 Lump Sum $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 80. 1 Lump Sum $ 10,000.00 3 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 8c. 24 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 1,D00.00 $ 24,000.00 8d. B F $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.000.00 se. 1 LumpSum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1000.00 50m ( L$716,752,908:00 $ 10,923,400.00 A.Total of Bid Items 1-8 Inclusive L$a1A752,968`,00 $; 10,9231400.00 u ers M AIIRisk 1 Lump Sum $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000.OU $ 25,000.00 Lump Sum Base Bid(Total Amount A&B $. 10,946,400.00 dtl(+1rDeletet.1forAlternateAdlusted Bid if Alternate Selected $ 10,948,400.00 TOTAL ADJUSTED BID $ 10,948,400.00 MIIRGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. C.W.ROEN CONS TRUCTION CO. N9wp.dtaa,n,Vi si8id D XP2-63 ease Bid Semma,y 2 Of 2 03/08/2000 F CDM Amendment No. 1 a February 22, 2000 Page 5 of 4 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS November 9, November 17, December 21, 1999 and January 17, 2000. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeng Dace TO Bd of Elm 031i2/a0 AGENDA REPORT iremNumber "em/N6be, Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION OF, AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE USER FEE RATE FOR, REVENUE AREAS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 AND 13 (REVENUE AREAS 7 AND 14 TO CONTINUE CURRENT REVENUE PROGRAM) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION The General Manager recommends rate and financial consolidation when the Directors have sufficient information to decide. SUMMARY At the last FAHR Committee meeting the Directors agreed that the proposal had merit and should be pursued. They directed staff to present information to the Board, in lieu of a weekend workshop, in order to determine if additional information was required. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Minimal costs, other than staff time. Financial and rate consolidation results in overall lower user fees. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our service paradigm to a regional focus and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a basic change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically, this change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate Revenue Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one user fee rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee structure, and Revenue Area 14 would continue to be funded by the existing contracts with the Irvine Ranch Water District. v w auv �,a¢ne�nxRsanrmoovnaneoamriotoo.aimuo..mc R¢vi5¢E' PR098 Page 1 There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy. • Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified • Auditing is simplified • Issuing long-term financing is simplified • Staffing and financing costs are reduced • Establishing sewer service fees is simplified There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into consideration. • Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers. • Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users. • Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRW D and receives no property tax or user fees directly from property owners. • Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid "cash"for most of their share of facilities. • Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets. See attached Staff Report. ALTERNATIVES Some Directors may agree that the annual sewer service user fee in RA 1 is higher than may be appropriate, but may not yet be willing to consolidate the fees. A potential alternative is for the other RA's to compensate RA 1 for the assessed value and property tax lost to regional governmental tax-exempt properties. In order for the average assessed value per EDU in RA 1 to equal the average, $3,563,463,200 would need to be added to the RA 1 assessed value. At the equivalent tax rate in RA 1, that additional value would generate $983,337. Using the assessed value per capita method, the additional property taxes would be $1,861,197. If RA 1 had additional revenues of this amount, the 1999-2000 annual user fee for a SFR could have been reduced from $110.04 to $84.70. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Staff Report with exhibits. R+ro.duun�+muene�nRmrena000uunewdR"casamdw,.aac Re.+ved MOM Page 2 March 15, 2000 STAFF REPORT Proposed Rate Structure In 1947 a blue-ribbon panel recommended the creation of individual Sanitation Districts to serve all of Orange County. In 1954 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 joined together to own and operate treatment and disposal facilities. Between 1954 and 1979 these Districts established annual budgets and property tax rates in order to provide necessary sewage collection treatment and disposal services. The individual property tax rates were a function of both financial need and property assessed valuation. The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 changed the funding process. No longer were the Districts able to establish property tax rates sufficient to meet their needs. In fact, the Districts had no control over property tax rates. Additionally, assessed values were reduced for many parcels and future assessed value growth was limited. In 1979, in an effort to develop a permanent tax allocation method to implement Proposition 13, the State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 8. Basically, AB 8 allocates the total "1% basic levy" collected within the County, adjusted first for redevelopment agencies, to each of the taxing agencies in the same ratios as those agencies received property taxes in 1979-80. Since both the ratios and the 1% rate are fixed, the only property tax variable is assessed value. Because the various Sanitation Districts had a pay-as-you-go philosophy and differing capital and operating funding needs in the late 1970's, they had differing property tax rates. The result of all of this is differing "effective tax rates" in each of the current Revenue Areas as follows: R/A 1998-99 AV Effective Tax Rate Tax Allocation 1 $ 6,513,664,662 .00027595 $1,797,414 2 35,082,620,856 .00028162 9,879,842 3 33,838,165,681 .00031991 10,825321 5 10.871,149,227 .00026484 2.879.152 6 5.934,887,167 .00022281 1,322,326 7 16.034,002,091 .00019568 3,137 591 11 9,021,892,230 .00024819 2.239,175 13 2,796,831.476 0 0 14 14,495,514,969 0 0 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Proposed Rate Structure Page 2 March 15, 2000 "Supplemental" User Fees In 1979 the Board of Directors adopted a Revenue Program. Such a program was a requirement of the Federal Clean Water Act and of the Districts' participation in the Clean Water Grant program. The Revenue Program provided that property taxes would continue to be the basic revenue source for the Districts. All industrial users and large commercial users would pay an additional charge based upon their actual quantity and strength of sewage discharged to our system. Finally, as property tax and other revenues became insufficient to fund the costs of operating, maintaining, rehabilitating and constructing necessary sewerage facilities, a"supplemental" user fee was authorized for all users. The need for these supplemental user fees did not arise in each of the Districts at the same time or in the same magnitude. The following schedule indicates the initiation date and rate, the current rate, and the 1999-2000, if the proposal had been in effect. The amounts shown are the annual rates for a single-family residence; different rates are charged for multi-family and for non-residential users. District or Proposed Revenue Implementation Initial 1999.2000 1999-2000 Area Date SFR Rate SFR Rate Rate 1 1984 $26.40 $110.04 $76.00 2 1990 55.00 76.00 76.00 3 1989 30.36 76.00 76.00 5 1982 26.40 87.50 76.00 6 1983 26.40 80.00 76.00 7 1991 40.00 66.00 76.00 11 1988 26A %00 76.00 13 1985 70.00 100.00 76.00 14 1 WA WA I WA I WA Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our focus to a regional viewpoint and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a basic change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically,this change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate Revenue Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one user fee rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee structure while other issues are resolved over the next year or two. Revenue Area 14 would continue to be funded by existing contracts with the Irvine Ranch Water District. Proposed Rate Structure Page 3 March 15, 2000 There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy. • Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified • Auditing is simplified • Issuing long-term financing is simplified • Staffing and financing costs are reduced • Establishing sewer service fees is simplified There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into consideration. • Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers. • Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users. • Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRWD and receives no property tax or user fees directly from property owners. • Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid 'bash"for most of their share of facilities. • Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets. Issues Outstanding Debt All of the Revenue Areas have issued some certificates of participation (COPS)to pay for collection and treatment facilities. The annual principal and interest payments are made from property taxes. User fees are used for some of the COP service in Revenue Area 1, and for all of it in Revenue Areas 13 and 14. The outstanding CON in Revenue Areas 13 and 14 amount to $1,998,245. This debt could be sold to the District thereby taking it off the books of RA 13 and 14, along with an equal amount of cash, and puffing it on the books of the District. In this manner the current debt service of the District would continue to be paid from property taxes. Since Revenue Areas 13 and 14 receive no property taxes and would have no outstanding COPS, they would not be participating. Future COPs would be issued by the District, and principal and interest payments would be made from future user fees. Cash Reserves and Net Assets While we all prefer to measure our economic or financial position by considering our cash and other assets, a more proper measure for the District would be net assets. In our case, net assets is the sum of our cash reserves and fixed assets, less the sum of accumulated depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities. The distribution of net assets is shown in the following table: Proposed Rate Structure Page 4 March 15, 2000 R/A NET ASSETS Total Per Per$100 R/A Net Assets Capita Per MGD Per EDU 1947 AV 1 $35,927 871 $ 159 $10 $ 494 $55 2 263,057,403 426 26 984 75 3 265 754.909 371 27 945 79 5 65 881 509 1,264 53 2,361 61 6 43 303,875 403 33 993 73 7 97,507 794 614 30 953 61 11 62853,871 532 31 1,232 70 13 21 1414,474 758 55 2,573 2 AVG I $422 $27 li $1,001 $3,865 $72 Prooertv Taxes We have previously discussed the differing shares of the property tax basic levy allocated to the individual Revenue Areas. One additional consideration is the total amount of the 1% basic levy. This tax levy is a result of Proposition 13, which limited the total basic property tax within the State to 1% of the assessed value. The base year assessed value was established as the value in 1975, thus removing four years of increased value from the tax roll. The District's service area includes a wide variety of property development, use, and value. There are very high value properties and very low value properties. There are properties with the 1975 value and there are properties developing and selling today. There are even properties with no assessed value. Whatever the assessed value,the District receives an average of 2.7% of the 1% basic levy. That is $27 a year for an assessed value of$100,000. Revenue Area 1 has the majority of the parcels with no assessed valuation, and which pay no property taxes. This is because the County seat and several State and Federal facilities are located in that area. It also has a concentration of some of the older homes and businesses in the County. The average assessed value in RA 1 is less than half of the average value per capita in RA 2-13, and only 64% of the average value per EDU. Clearly RA 1 receives a disproportionately low share of the property tax, because of this low assessed value, while providing a disproportionately large share of regional services such as courts, jails and county administration for our service area. Revenue Area 7 Revenue Area 7 includes parts of the cities of Tustin, Irvine, Orange, Newport Beach and Santa Ana, as well as some major unincorporated areas. In 1986, the District took over the responsibility for local sewer service from the Seventh and Seventieth Sewer Maintenance Districts which were administered by the County. This action made then District 7 unique amongst the Sanitation Districts; it became the only District (Revenue Proposed Rate Structure Page 5 March 15, 2000 Area) that is responsible for maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of local sewers. Local sewers are generally owned and operated by a city, sanitary district or water district. This is the case in all of the other Revenue Areas and in some parts of Revenue Area 7. The areas generally and loosely described as City of Tustin, Irvine Business Center, and unincorporated areas comprise the former Sewer Maintenance Districts. In these area, which includes the Tustin Air Base, Revenue Area 7 is responsible for approximately 200 miles of local, small-diameter sewers. There are several issues to be resolved involving these local sewers. Ultimately these local sewers will need to be rehabilitated or repaired. A 1998 review by RW Beck, an engineering firm, projected costs of$40 million between 2038 and 2040 without regard for inflation. Currently, these projected costs have not been included in the adopted annual sewer service user fees. In order to have these funds available when needed, an additional $9 would need to be added to the current annual SFR user fee. The impact on fees, if the funds are not accumulated in advance, would be an additional $185 per SFR in the first year, decreasing to $117 and $78 in the following years. Much of these former Sewer Maintenance Districts receive water service from the Irvine Ranch Water District. This includes all of the Irvine Business Center, parts of Tustin, and unincorporated areas. Additionally, the Tustin Air Base is scheduled to be served by the IRWD. The IRWD has proposed that local sewer service responsibilities be transferred from Revenue Area 7 to the IRWD wherever IRWD provides water service. This would be consistent with the rest of the IRWD service area and with Revenue Area 14. One of the reasons the Sanitation Districts assumed this local service responsibility in 1986 was to protect the property taxes. Approximately 48% and 67% of the property taxes would have been diverted to the Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF), if the Sewer Maintenance Districts remained intact or if responsibilities were transferred to the cities. Staff has been able to reconstruct the property tax, user fee, and local sewer maintenance costs since 1986, but is still researching the allocation of joint works treatment operations and capital improvements. Preliminary estimates indicate there may be some residual funds available to begin to fund the rehabilitation and replacement needs discussed earlier. Of course, if the local sewer responsibilities were transferred to IRWD, then the accumulated funds and future taxes would be transferred along with the fixed assets. While these local sewer related issues are being discussed, negotiated and resolved, staff recommends that Revenue Area 7 be excluded from the proposed consolidation of assets, liabilities and user fees. Once these issues are resolved and Revenue Area 7 is like the rest of the District, or there is a method to fund and account for local sewer rehabilitation and replacement, it will be appropriate to reconsider the final step of Proposed Rate Structure Page 6 March 15, 2000 consolidation. Many believe that recent actions and current proposals at the USEPA will ultimately require the OCSD to assume responsibility for all local sewers. Revenue Area 14 The Irvine Ranch Water District provides local sewer service to all of Revenue Area 14. There are several agreements and contracts dating back to 1985 that contain the details of the IRW D connection to the District. In the simplest of terms, the IRWD is billed directly for the Revenue Area 14 share of operating, maintenance, capital improvement, and certificate of participation costs. Treatment plant O&M and capital costs are based upon actual flows. Neither the alternative nor the proposal is expected to change any of the provisions of the existing agreements. Neither the alternative nor the proposal includes collecting Revenue Area 14 user fees on the property tax bill. Alternative Proposal Some Directors may agree that the annual sewer service user fee in RA 1 is higher than may be appropriate, but are not yet willing to consolidate the fees. A potential alternative is for the other RA's to compensate RA 1 for the assessed value and property tax lost to regional governmental tax-exempt properties. In order for the average assessed value per EDU in RA 1 to equal the average, $3,563,463,200 would need to be added to the RA 1 assessed value. At the equivalent tax rate in RA 1, that additional value would generate$983,337. Using the assessed value per capita method, the additional property taxes would be $1,861,197. If RA 1 had additional revenues of this amount, the SFR annual user fee could be reduced from $110.04 to $84.70 as shown in the following table. 1999-2000 Prop Tax Revised RAfl281,300 SFR Rate Reimb/EDU 3FR RATE 1 $110.04 25.64 $84.70 2 76.00 2.13 78.13 3 76.00 2.13 78.135 87.50 2.13 89.636 80.00 2.13 82.137 66.00 2.13 68.1311 90.00 2.13 92.13 13 8.400 100.00 2.13 102.13 14• 23,800 84.03 2.13 86.126 'RA 14 EDU and Rate are estimated from average daily flow and$2 milron per year mnfrbution. Proposed Rate Structure Page 7 March 15, 2000 Attachments Several worksheets and graphs are enclosed with this report. They are intended to provide background information requested by the Committee and to stimulate discussion at the meeting. Each is briefly described with bullet points in the following sections. Exhibit A: Revenue Area Representation • When current fees were established the vote was by District. Each Director voted only on the fees in the District which included the Director's city. • Since the 1998 consolidation, all of the Directors vote for all of the Revenue Areas, whether or not that Director's city is included in the Revenue Area. • A vote to change fees now requires a two-thirds vote of all of the Directors, or 17 votes. • This schedule provides an idea of how many people and cities are affected by rate decisions. Exhibit B: Analysis of Net Assets • Net assets is a better measure of current economic health than simply "reserves" or cash balances. Net assets is the sum of current cash balances and fixed assets, less the sum of depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities. • The ranking of Revenue Areas by net assets can be based on several variables. Just using the total is too simplistic and misleading because of the varying sizes of the Revenue Areas. • The chart shows net assets for each Revenue Area on the basis of per capita, per flow in million gallons a day, per acre of land and per$100 of assessed value. • The blue highlights show that ranking by each of the variables produces a different Revenue Area with the highest value. This indicates that the relationship between net assets and user fees may not be a good decision criteria as selecting the variable alters the result. Exhibit C: Previously Adopted Supplemental User Fees • The first user fee was adopted in 1982 in District 5. Other Districts adopted fees as their financial situations required, until all had user fees in 1991. • Regular, routine and required fee increases were apart of the Financial Plan adopted in 1990. Proposed Rate Structure Page 8 March 15, 2000 • Rate increases were deferred from 1991 to 1997 because of the poor economy. • In 1992-93 fees were increased as an urgency measure to replace property taxes anticipated to be confiscated by the State. District 11 did not increase fees at this time. • In 1997 Districts 1 and 11 adopted 10-year rate increases and Districts 2 through 7 adopted 5-year rate increases after considerable study and evaluation of alternatives. • When the Districts consolidated on July 1, 1998, the new District adopted the previously approved rate increases through 2001-02 for each of the Revenue Areas. The remaining 5 years of adjustments for Revenue Areas 1 and 11 were not adopted. • The adoption of a revised rate structure for 1998-1999 after the Rate Advisory Committee and Strategic Plan process allowed for some minor rate decreases in order for the program to be "revenue neutral." • No Board actions are required to implement the previously adopted rates or slightly reduced rates for 2000-01 and/or 2001-02. Exhibit D: Average Daily Flow • Most costs at the District are based upon or caused by wastewater flow. The O&M projected for each year depend upon flow projections. Lower flows will result in lower user fee projections. A portion of the Capital Improvement Program is for additional capacity, based upon flow projections. • Strategic Plan flow projections were based upon population projections, city general plans, and history. • Current flows are somewhat below the Strategic Plan estimates. Projected flows in the year 2020 remain unchanged. • Average daily flow is variable and difficult to project. • Higher average flow years may correspond to higher rainfall years. • Higher than average rainfall was experienced in 1994-95 and 1997-98. • Higher than average flows were also experienced in 1994-95 and 1997-98. • The increased flows seem to be proportional to the rainfall. • Higher than average flows in 1996-97 are not explained by rainfall. Proposed Rate Structure Page 9 March 15, 2000 Exhibit E: SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown • Many factors affect user fee calculations, including costs and revenues. • All current revenue streams are projected to continue. • User fees are for three main categories of casts: Operations & Maintenance, Capital Improvements and Rehabilitation, and Debt Service. • New debt financing requires increased fees, but less than pay-asyou-go. • Summary schedule for 1999-2000, 2003-04 and 2008-09 shows that the majority of increased user fees will be used for the capital improvement program and debt service. Exhibit F: Proiected SFR User Fees Charts • There are individual graphics for four alternatives. • Alternative 1 is the status quo. Each Revenue Area adopts its own fees based upon its own needs. This alternative raises the most fees. • Alternative 2 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years. Fees above the average are then maintained until the average reaches their level. By 2013-14, all Revenue Areas will have the same fee. This alternative avoids fee increases for several years after 2002-03 in Revenue Areas 1, 5, 11 and 13. • Alternative 3 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years also. In 2002-03 all Revenue Areas adopt the same fee. This alternative results in reduced fees for users in Revenue Areas 1, 3, 5, 11 and 13; approximately 1.2 million people. • Alternative 4 implements the unified consolidated rate immediately in 2000-01, unless the previously adopted rate is lower. In that case,the previously adopted rates are implemented until they reach the average. All Revenue Areas are paying the same rate in 2001-02. This alternative results in rate decreases in 2000-01 for Revenue Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, 11 and 13, approximately 1.3 million people. Exhibit G: Annual SFR Sewer User Fees • This schedule summarizes the four alternatives. • No fees are currently adopted for 2002-03. Potentially fees will increase for some or all of our 2.2 million users. • The proposed annual sewer fees are shown by year for each alternative and each Revenue Area. Proposed Rate Structure Page 10 March 15, 2000 • The lowest fee is highlighted for each year, for each alternative, and each Revenue Area. • All of the consolidation alternatives result in lower average fees than those from retaining separate revenue areas. • Population estimates are also provided to help gauge the impact of the changes. • Alternative 4 provides immediate rate reduction to approximately 1.3 million users. Exhibit H: One District Excluding 7 & 14 One Rate Cash Flow Projections • Provides "detail'to support earlier summary of User Fee Breakdown. • O&M Expense, line 9, is based on current cost per mg and projected flows. • Capital Outlay, line 10, is from Strategic Plan. • COP Services, line 11, assumes 25-year debt shown on line 4 at 6.5%. Repaying $100,000,000 adds approximately$11.00 to the annual user fee. • Annual SFR User Fees are shown on line 17 and calculate the amounts on line 1. • Schedule assumes property taxes, line 3, will continue to be allocated to District. • Schedule reflects Alternative 4, the lowest rates. Other alternatives would raise more fees. GGS:lc V4 dmWatal\wp.dWNAn%210kcmne\FAHRTah2000War%BwrdSRConeRAs.doe 03/01/2000 11:59 AM Revenue Area Representation Population Description 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Jan 1, 1999 Est Population, 2000 228,965 656,434 749,953 61,119 111,470 169,146 128,774 46,072 Anaheim x x x 306,298 Brea x x x 38.388 Buena Park x 75,869 Costa Mesa x X X 105,608 Cypress x 48,517 Fountain Valley x x 56,445 Fullerton x x 126,757 Garden Grove x x 156,534 Huntington Beach x X 196,660 Irvine x 136,577 La Habra x x 55,805 La Palma x 16,395 Los Alamitos x 12,031 Newport Beach X x x 73,965 Orange X X x x 127,603 Placentia x 49,127 Santa Ana X x x x 314,990 Seal Beach X 27,192 Stanton X 33,853 Tustin x x 66,834 Villa Park X 6,630 Westminster x 86,248 m Yorba Linda X x 61,839 S W D G:bxcel.dtaNnW Uatreed!Qty Fees except 7 02/29/2000 6:35 PM Analysis of Net Assets Assets Minus Liabilities Includino COPS Shadlne Indicates Hiohest Value Net Assets Per R4 Total Capita MGD Acre $100 AV 1 35,927,871 159 10 2,983 55 2 263,057,403 426 26 3,874 75 3 265,754,909 371 27 4,068 79 5 65,881.509 1,153 53 5.600 61 6 43,303,875 403 33 4,414 73 7 97,507,794 614 30 4,362 61 11 62,853,871 533 31 6,205 70 13 21,614,474 758 55 947 2 Wtd Avg 422 27 3.865 72 m x x m W G^et<oel.deNn12101stree W-00 bWgOlTrue consolidation Net Assets OW912000 245 PM Previously Adopted Supplemental user Fees Revised Structlite' 84-85 85- 86-07 87_88 88_89 89_90 90_91 91-92 92-93' 93-94 94=95 95-96 96-97 2LO 9&99'.moo•: 9900 00-01 01-02 ANNUAL SFR FEES 1 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 34.32 45.00 55.00 75.00 83.24 83.24 53.24 83.24 83.24 91.36 100.27 ' 96.41 110.04 120.77 132.55 2 65.00 60.00 71.52 71.52 71.52 71.62 71.52 73.00 75.00 74.00 76.00 80.00 82.00 3 30.36 50.00 60.00 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 75.00 MOD 75.50 76.001 78.00 80.00 5 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 26.40 45.00 55.00 75.00 96.75 96.75 95.75 96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75 $4.50 87.50 87.50 87.60 6 26.40 26.40 29.04 31.68 38.02 49.00 55.00 MOD 76.47 76.47 76.47 76.47 78.47 78.00 80.00 79.00 80.00 84.00 86.00 7 40.00 50.D9 50.09 50.09 50.09 50.09 55.00 60.00 60.00 66.00 73.00 80.00 11 26.40 40.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 MOD 80.00 80.00 , MOD 101.25 113.91 13 70.00 70.00 70.00 78.40 78.40 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 WO.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Rates Unchanged from year of implementation: 'Rates were originally adopted equal to 1991-92 'RAC rate stucture Dist 1:1984,Dist 5: 1982.Dist 6: 1983,Dist 13: 1985 but increased in response to State tax confiscation allowed decrease for SFR X 2 W 1 n G:lexcel.dta1fin1210MtreadWW d copy%EXCELDTAWae Hist osrzMM Average Daily Flow Actual Thru 1998-99 Growth Projection Thru 2019-20 450 400 - --- - -- - - - -- -- 350 300 A I7 L d a 250 c 0 m c 200 0 150 100 50 0 X 2 W Fiscal Year Ened June 30 1 0 —�-1955 Actual —1955 Linear —1992 Linear -L -CDM Projections +Modified CDM Projections M,Mplanfl.hist B pr.LChadl 4,0 PM 02/E9/2000 Page 1 of 1 SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown All Revenue Areas Except 7 and 14 A E J K 1999-2000 Estimates 2003-04 Estimates 2008-M Estimates 10 Year Ref Total Per EDU Total Per EDU Total Per EDU Total 1 Operations 8 Maintenance 2 Collection System O&M 7,720,500 10.26 8,359,000 10.96 9,231,000 11.89 84,560,500 3 Treatment Plant OBM 38,328,000 50.95 40,641,000 53.27 45.276,000 68.33 412,430,000 4 Total O&M Expense 46,048,500 61.21 49,000.000 64.23 54,607,000 70.23 496,990.500 5 Permitted User Fees (5,591,000) (7.43) (6,176,000) (8.10) (6,987,000) (9.00) (62,675.000) 6 Interest Income 20,164,000 6.80 17,301,000 22.68) (16,368,000) 21.09 (184,609,000) 7 Net OBM Expense 20,293,500 26.97 25.523,000 33AS 31.152.000 40.14 249,706,500 8 Capital Improvements 9 Collection System CIP 21,467,100 28.53 26,793,100 35.12 12.812.000 16.51 171,440,000 10 Treatment Plant CIP 59,803,000 79.49 65.641,100 86.04 59,101,000 76.14 704.045,100 11 Total Capital lmprovemt 81,270,100 108.03 92.434,200 121.16 71,913.000 92.65 875.485.100 12 Connection Fees (4,823,000) (6.41) (4,847,000) (6.35) (4,877.000) (6.28) (48.600.000) 13 Capacity Sales,SAWPA 0 0.00 (6,045,000) (7.92) 0.00 (17,591,000) 14 From Savings or New COPS 42,238,000 56.14 63,190,000 82.83) 52,680,000 67.88 (597,642,000) 15 Net Capital Outlay 34,209,100 45.47 18,352,200 24.06 14,346.000 18.48 211,852.100 16 Debt Service 17 COP Service 32.238,000 42.85 52,976,000 69.44 70,560,000 90.91 633,966,000 18 Property Taxes (29.568,000) (39.30) (32,004,000) (41.95) (35,337,000) (45.53) (323,757,000) 19 Net COP Service 2,670,000 3.55 20,972,000 27.49 35,223,000 45.38 210,108,000 20 Raised by General User Fees 57,172,600 76.00 64,847,200 85.00 80,721,000 104.00 671,666,600 21 No.of Equiv Dwelling Units 752,320 762,920 776,170 22 Average Daily Flow(mgd) 240 0.000319 283 0.000345 293 0.000377 23 New Borrowing 72,000,000 92.78 495,000,000 Revenue Area 99-00 Budget x7814_Use Fee Analysis 11:27 AM RI � �� Projected SFR User Fees $180 $160 - $140 L $120 - $100 - $80 Q $60 $40 $20 m x $0Im ILLU LL[L[l E Jillill iiiiiiii LLLLLLI] [iLLLW 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 = 1 =2 = 3 EM5 = 6 07 = 11 = 13 - One Rate o�.z9'onu Rate Chad(3)Chad 1 9,58 AM Projected SFR User Fees $180 $160 $140 $120 m m m- (D a) U- $100 FD D $80 m c Q $60 $40 $20 IBM m x 0 W x 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 -, T W E= 11=2 = 3M15 =6O7 = 11 = 13 - OneRatej 0snen000 Revenue Area9 00 Budget X7814.xle Chart 1 10:09AM Projected SFR User Fees $180 �- $160 $140 $120 j m- a� L- $100 � $80 - c Q $60 $40 $20 m x $0 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 =1 T AL 01 02 =3 O5 =6 O7 = 11 = 13 —One Rate 02 29 20M Revenue Area 99-00 Budget X7614> ChM 1-1 10,27 AM 03/01/2000 12:33 PM Annual SFR Sewer User Fees Already Adopted Fees vs. "One-Rate"Alternatives Shading Represents Lowest Rate Alternative Description 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Est Population, 2000 228,985 656,434 749,953 61,119 111,470 169.146 128,774 46,072 Adopted Fees 1999-2000 110.04 76.00 77.00 87.50 80.00 66.00 90.00 100.00 2000-01 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00 2001-02 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00 Alt 1 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00 Alt 2 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00 Alt 3 00-01 Fees 120.77 80.00 78.00 87.50 82.00 73.00 101.25 100.00 Alt 4 00-01 Fees 78.00 78.00 78.00 78.00 78.00 73.00 78.00 78.00 Alt 1 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00 Alt 2 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 60.00 113.91 100.00 Alt 3 01-02 Fees 132.55 82.00 80.00 87.50 84.00 80.00 113.91 100.00 Alt 01-02 Fees 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 No Fees Adopted Alt 1 02-03 Fees 145.47 84.00 82.00 87.50 86.00 87.00 123.00 100.00 All 2 02-03 Fees 132.55 82.50 82.50 87.50 84.00 82.50 113.91 100.00 Alt 3 02-03 Fees 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 m Alt 02-03 Fees 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 82.50 x 2 Co 07 G:becel.EtaViM210WreatlV3kck Veatch Survey 2000 031012000 12 45 PIA Orange County Sanitation District One District Excluding 7 & 14, One Rate Cash Flow Projections No Adopted Rates Adopted In 1997 R.I. Preferred Preliminary Palmer, Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary 10 Year Rol De�Deen 19%.00 244491 20)1 02 o2a3 4144 04-05 05�06 0667 07-0 at,0s L Revenues: 1 General User Foes 57,176,320 58,687,860 60,609,600 62,122275 64,618.200 66.957.375 69.901 73,232.650 76,578,480 50.721,6110 671.672.290 2 Permitted User Fees 5.591,000 5.732.000 5.877.000 6,025.0% 6.176.0% 6=000 6,40.9,000 6,651,000 6,817,M 6,987,000 62,675,000 3 Property Tawas 29.568,000 30.159.000 30.761,000 31977,0% 32.004,000 32.644,000 33.298.000 33,955,000 34,644,000 35,337,000 323,757,000 4 New COP Issues - 126.000,000 - 127,000,000 - 100.000,000 - 70,0%.000 - 72,0110,000 495,000,000 5 Interest Revenues 20,164,000 21,686,000 20,250,000 16,3 .= 17,301,000 17.262.000 18.073.000 17.M.9 17267.M 16,369,000 184,609,000 6 Connection Fees 4923,000 4.629,000 4.8215,1)00 4,641,000 4.847.000 4.M.000 4,059.000 4,865,000 4,871,000 4,877,000 48.=).000 7 Other Revenues(Ind IRWD) 571E1 8.610.00e) 3.142000 110 7.196,000 1,155,000 1159000 7208,000 116]00) 1.167000 W.m.00o 8 Revenues 114 .320 255.913,660 125.474,600 251.462 ]5 1323n.200 229.251.375 1W.786.020 213,009,650 141,04 W 217,457.680 1,675,375260 Requirements'. 9 Oper&Meet,Erp 46,046500 45.7n.000 d6.515.000 41,905,000 49.000.0001 50,M.M 51,192,000 52293.000 53.398.01)) 54,507.000 4%,990,500 10 Capital Outlays,Ind GWR6 61,270.000 126.006.000 125.6159% 127,774,000 92.433,0110 58,474,M 55231,000 67,062.000 69.623.0D0 71.913.000 615,436,0W 11 COP service is 5%,25 yr) 32,235,000 37,375,000 42.263,0% 47,684,000 52,976,000 5].1]9,%0 61.594,000 64,467,000 67,529,000 70,560900 533.565.000 12 Order Rearinmt,me 6975000 2975,000 2.975,000 975A00 975.000 975000 975.000 975.000 975,000 975,000 19750,0% 13 Requirements 1%.531,500 212173000 217.674.000 224330.000 1%984,0% 166.722.000 160,992.000 154,797,000 191,525,000 197.9155oto 1,926991,5% 14 Revenues Requiremente 7.971,820 K),74 ,W (92,19 ,400) 27.124,275 (0.011.81 62.529.375 (35.205,950) 29,012,65) (50,10Q5m) 19,502.650 (50.716240) Accumulated Funds. 15 Beginning of Year 344,953,000 352.924.020 398.665.480 304.466.080 301,590.355 20,578,555 331107,930 295,901,950 324,914,600 274,734p50 344953,000 16 End of Year 352924820 30665460 Jp4,d%,OBO 331590.355 268578555 331107930 295 WI 950 324.914.600 274734.060 294,236760 294.236.7W sewer service Use,Fees: 17 Avg SFR Annual User Fee $76.00 $7890 $80.00 $82.50 $85.00 $87.50 $91.00 $95.00 $99.00 $104.00 10 Porconlage Clunga (328%) 263% 2.%% 3,13% 3.03% 2.94% 4,00% 4.40111& 421% 5.05% 19 Equivalent Dwelling Units 752,320 754970 757,620 760,270 762,920 765,570 768,220 770.870 ]73.520 776,170 20 SFR Connection Feel $1,820 $1820 $1,BM $1.820 $1.620 $t.620 $1,820 $1,520 11I.M $I.W0 Prot Avg Daily Flea(m8d) 250 245 251 257 263 20 275 281 267 29$ COP Coverage Ratios 21 Senne Lien.Min 1.25 6.59 3,61 297 2W 255 2.23 2.18 2.34 2,13 2.13 22 Joe.Lien,Min 100 3.19 1.72 138 1.17 1.16 1.00 097 1,02 0,93 0.92 m 23 Sr Additional Bonds,1 25 659 361 2.97 2.56 2.56 2.23 2.18 2.34 2.13 2,13 x 24 Jr Additional Bonds,100 526 238 172 1,32 129 099 0.94 1.04 0.87 906 as an G'.`ozcel.dWYm21OW9-00 BudgeuRevenue Area 99-W Budget%7&14 One DisM 7 8 14,one late