HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-12-15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
December 8, 1999
Pool NOTICE OF MEETING
(7141 9 62-2411
ntl0np BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Bo. E.812T 612
Rumon Valle,CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
9272B-B127
M"EllA rcV WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
fountain Valley.G
92)B9-7n1B
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Agencies
•
crtl.. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Arehe,m
Brea
Buene Perk f
Cypress
Po.htam Velley -
artan
Gordongto B
Huntingto n Beamch Bobs d Secretafy
o-hre
Le Halite
Le Palma
Los Alamitos
",,o,Beach
Brange
Ple.enue Ten
tatively - Scheduled Uocomin Meetings
Santa Ana 9 g.
Beal Beech
Stanton
r s°n STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 15, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
un.Pen:
)'orEa Linda
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
County a1 orange SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, December 21, 1999 at 4:30 p.m.
@OCWD
sa.meary ol.erin.
co:ra Mesa STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, January 26, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Midway Gry
wearer m.erin.
frier.Bench
-Tea Protect the Pmbc Heald ordure Ennrcnment through Excellence in Wastewater systems'
a
• mo
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
April April 26, 2000
May May 24, 2000
June June 28, 2000
July •July 19, 2000
August August 23, 2000
September September 27, 2000
October October 25, 2000
November "November 15, 2000
December 'December 20, 2000
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
H:Wp.dlaWminlBVAVendM1999 Meeting NaU a WN9.2.dw
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 15, 1999 — 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
12/15/99 '
Page 2
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meetings held on
November 10 and November 17, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so
ordered by the Chair.
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 11/15/99 11/30/99
Totals $4,826,065.58 $4,848,913.81
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not
specifically removed from same, as follows:
9. Approve Consultant Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group,
Inc. for the development of 8,000 Hazardous Energy Control Procedures to be
completed by December 31, 2003, for an amount not to exceed $325,864.
10. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a five-year payment agreement for Capital
Facilities Capacity Charges for Emmanuel House in Santa Ana.
11. Approve an agreement with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, (SAWPA)
allowing the purchase of two million gallons per day of Treatment and Disposal
Capacity Rights at the District to be used for desalter brine discharge, for a total
amount due to the District of $4,493,642.20.
12/15/99
Page 3
12. (1)Approve Amendment No.1 to Cooperative Project Contracts CP-9906 (Sunset
Beach Sanitation District), CP-9908 (City of Placentia), and CP-9909 (City of Placentia)
extending the expiration dates for an additional six months; and (2) Authorize the
General Manager to approve one-time extensions of up to six months for Cooperative
Projects Program contract agreements.
13. (1) Approve plans and specifications for the New Engineering Trailer at Plant
No. 1, Job No. J-75, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum
No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation; and (4) Award a contract to Brandall Modular Corporation for New
Engineering Trailer at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-75, for an amount not to exceed
$228,000.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
14. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re December 15, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on November 17, 1999 to be filed.
16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re December 1, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 1, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve a project to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit, at no cost to
the District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an
approximate cost of$125,000 contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4%
improvement in cake solids.
d. 1)Approve a budget amendment increase of$350,000 for the mechanical
maintenance materials, supplies and services budget from $1,742,000 to
$2,092,000 for the Top-end Overhaul of Four Central Generation Engines,
Specification No. M-063, for a total project budget of$700,000; 2) Receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 3)Award a contract to Statoil
Energy, Inc. for Top-end Overhaul of Central Power Generation Engines,
Specification No. M-063 for a total amount not to exceed $677,000.
e. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation,
providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station, extending
the contract period from January 26, 2000 to June 30, 2000.
12/15/99 '
Page 4
1 �
17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
December 2, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES-
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
December 2, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve a budget of$1,113,637 for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 3-25.
d. Approve Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for
Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Studies, Job No. J-73-1, for a total amount not to
exceed $74,235.
e. Approve a budget amendment of$22,405,756 for Area Classification Studies
Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, for a revised total
project cost of$29,620,416.
f. Approve a sole source equipment purchase for the Grit Auger Replacement,
Job No. J-52.
g. (1) Approve plans and specifications for the Outfall Flow Meter Replacement,
Job No. J-66, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Authorize the
General Manager to set January 11, 2000, at 11:00 a.m., for bid opening; (3)
Authorize the Director of Engineering to publish the Notice Inviting Bids; and (4)
Approve a budget amendment of$200,000 for a total project budget of
$1,124,000.
h. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown
and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job
No. P1-37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of
$189,537 for a total amount not to exceed $3,067,279.
18. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re December 8, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 8, 1999 to be filed.
(Minutes will be distributed at the December 15, 1999 meeting.)
C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of November 1999.
d. Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the independent
audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional three-year
period, for an amount not to exceed $42,600 for FY 99/00, $44,300 for FY
00/01, and $46,000 for FY 01/02.
12/15/99
Page 5
e. Approve an agreement with California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CaIPERS) authorizing actuarial valuation to determine contribution
costs to District if the District were to enter into an agreement with CalPERS, for
an amount not to exceed $1,400.
f. Receive and file Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Final Report
dated December 1999.
19. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re November 17, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 17, 1999 to be filed.
20. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing
Ordinance No. OCSD-09:
a. Verbal report of General Counsel
b. Verbal report of Staff
C. Receive and file written comments, if any
d. Open hearing
e. Close hearing
f. Discussion by Board
g. Recommended actions:
1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-09 (The waiver
of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present); and,
2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11.
21. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-12, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by
Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the
County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04:
a. Verbal report of Staff
b. Verbal report of General Counsel.
C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-12 by title only, and waive reading of said
entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be
adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.)
12/15/99
Page 6 '
d. Motion to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-12 as an urgency
measure, to be effective immediately.
e. Approve Early Retirement Incentive Agreement with Orange County Employees
Retirement System in connection with Ordinance No. OCSD-12.
22.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee -
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los
Angeles County, et al. County of Kern, et al., Kern County Superior
Court Case No. 240163 NFT (Government Code Section 54956.9).
2. Confer with General Counsel re Burge, et al. v. Orange County
Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No.
800278 (Government Code Section 54956.9).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session
23. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
24. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
25. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
26. Adjournment
12/15/99
Page 7
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of
business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
H:kw Ala\agenda\B rd Agendas\1999 Board Agendas\102799Am
• ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: December 15, 199 TIME: 7:00 o.m.
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................�G ✓
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHFAD...................
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS....................... ✓ ✓
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... �/ —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... Ll
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE...................... 0� — —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. v-
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN.................... GL —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................
�/�/ — —
(SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON...................
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... —
(MARSHALL).....................MAULtEft"................... - —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... v — —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. y — —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... C4-� — —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. �7 _ _
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI................... —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... _
(SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN............................C G2/ — —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... — —
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... —
STAFF:
Anderson
Ghirelli Kyle
Ludwin
McInty
les
Miles re m
--
Ooten
Tomko
Streed
Tuchman
OTHERS: >W~
Woodruff ✓
Andrus
12/15/99
WadonWala I%wp Etas dmiMBSOIRECTOROirectors Roll Call.dse
• SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
m f 9 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
(pleaseprint) leaseprint)
s4c.- p11 �-Z_ nC-r
Lou u
dC5
`k
HAWP.DTA'A0MIN19SW0RMMISIGN-IN FORM. O
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Supplemental Agenda
,,for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District to be held on )OZ4 f/� /f, 19/`f was dully posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ,Qe�to , 19%i�
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /V day of
Penny Kyle,
Board of Director
Orange County Sanitation District
H:1WP.DTAIADMINMBSIFORMSIAGENDA CERTIFICATION-SUPPLEMENTALMOC
I�
r
STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.oroir.
12115/99 22115/99
AGENDA REPORT RemMm1w item Number
9rot zsmt
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Originator: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
SUBJECT: ADOPT A POLICY FOR INTERIM ACCEPTANCE OF DRY
WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy for interim acceptance into the District's treatment plants of dry
weather urban runoff
SUMMARY
The District has received a request from the Irvine Ranch Water District to divert
dry weather urban runoff from a housing development project proposed by the
Irvine Company to the OCSD's wastewater treatment facilities. Our direct
experience with this practice is limited. We have only short term operating
experience with dry weather urban runoff diversion facilities now operating in the
Dunes area of Newport Bay and at four pump stations that normally discharge
into the Talbert Channel system located within the City of Huntington Beach.
Absent a long-term policy to which we can look for advice on how to handle the
request, staff recommends the Board adopt a policy for interim acceptance of dry
weather urban runoff. Staff plans to evaluate any requests from developers
seeking to divert dry weather urban runoff into the District's treatment facilities
pursuant to that policy direction from the Board.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. Pine item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
X Not applicable(information item)
N nq.o d.,i na.ld Rga 11 aedam Agenda R.1.11 en.m zse aoc
R„..,: � Pagel
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Storm water and dry weather urban runoff are now regarded as among the
largest sources of pollution to the coastal waters of the United States. In
southern California, advances in sewage treatment have greatly reduced the
emissions of contaminants from sewage treatment plant and industrial
discharges into the ocean. As a result, emissions from dry and wet weather
urban runoff now constitute a much larger portion of the pollutant inputs to
coastal waters. Of greatest concern are water quality impairments related to
human health (safety of swimming and seafood consumption) and ecosystem
health (presence of a natural balance of species).
Recent regulatory developments have focussed greater attention on the issue of
urban runoff. Municipalities, industries, and development projects are now
required to comply with NPDES storm water permits that require implementation
of best management practices for wet weather discharges to receiving waters.
Similarly, dry weather urban runoff has come under closer scrutiny, particularly in
coastal areas throughout California, where summertime runoff flowing through
storm drains onto the beach has been linked to high bacterial counts and beach
closures. The Huntington Beach closures of this summer are just one example
of this phenomenon.
Just in the past month, the District has received inquiries from two developers,
the Irvine Company (Newport Coast) and Hearthside Homes (Bolsa Chica),
proposing to divert dry weather runoff from their developments into the Districts
system. In both of these cases, there are obvious public health and
environmental benefits to intercepting and treating the runoff from these
developed areas. For example, Los Trancos Canyon, the site of the Irvine
Company development, drains to Crystal Cove State Beach, an area that has
been posted by the Health Department with signs warning against swimming in
runoff-affected waters. Diverting runoff from the beach to the sewer system will
provide public health benefits to swimmers and other recreational users.
Similarly, the Regional Water Quality Control Board has designated this stretch
of coastline as an ASBS—area of special biological significance. Diverting runoff
that may be carrying pesticides, fertilizers, and other chemicals, away from this
area will protect and enhance water quality. At Huntington Beach this summer,
high bacteria levels on the beach returned to normal within days following the
diversion to the District's sewer system of several storm drain pump stations that
had been discharging to Talbert Channel. The beaches were subsequently
reopened and have remained so ever since.
The public policy advantages for the District to accept dry weather urban runoff
must be balanced with the need to maintain the long-term reliability of the
sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment facilities owned and operated by the
R t«p.EeYpmAa�Routl�Reperullme&u,E Ap�,W Rpan�lAPMn EU.J%
RpaeJ; Page 2
District. Staff is particularly concerned with winter hydraulic demands on our
system. Wintertime peak flows can quickly overwhelm the hydraulic capacity of
our facilities and may cause raw sewage spills. Because of this potential
problem and the drastic consequences to the environment, it is staffs position
that OCSD should not accept winter storm flows. This would include "first flush"
storm water runoff that carries the accumulated buildup of debris, bacteria, and
chemicals, from streets, rooftops, parking lots, and industrial sites. While
sewering this "first flush" has obvious advantages, the potential risk of a sudden
rain event quickly overwhelming the capacity of a sewer line and creating an
even greater environmental problem is unacceptable.
Staff proposes the Board consider a policy for interim acceptance of dry weather
urban runoff based on the following principles:
1. The proposed diversion solves a public health or environmental problem
associated with the runoff discharge that cannot be otherwise addressed
economically or practically.
2. The District will accept dry weather flows only during the period April 15
through October 15. The District will not accept wet weather runoff into the
system.
3. The quality and quantity of the discharge must not be harmful to the District's
facilities, compliance with our ocean discharge permit or other regulatory
requirements, or water reuse practices.
4. The OCSD will have sole discretionary authority to stop the discharge without
prior notice.
5. The design of the diversion structures must meet the requirements
established by the OCSD and meet the approval of OCSD prior to making the
connection and commencing operation.
6. Until a permanent policy is in place, OCSD is not prepared to commit to a
long-tens agreement with any party for acceptance of dry weather urban
runoff. In the interim, until the Board adopts a permanent policy, staff will
issue temporary special discharge permits for up to one-year duration, subject
to terms and conditions established by OCSD. The District's Board of
Directors will consider renewal of a permit following the first year of upon the
recommendation of the General Manager.
7. The District prefers that the number of diversion connections from a project to
the sewer system be kept to a minimum. A pumped diversion is the preferred
alternative method of discharge to prevent debris from entering the District's
system.
B. The project proponent must install appropriate filters or other control
technology acceptable to the District to remove grease and oil or other
objectionable substances.
9. During the term of the permit, in accordance with OCSD Ordinance Nos. 10
and 11, the District will charge an operation and maintenance fee of
approximately $400 per million gallons of diverted runoff. The District will also
N.Mp.S Yib��+N.pmqPe{nb\188BBUN AWMi NN^d\IA�Lm2U.M1c
P,.�, Page 3
0
charge a capital facilities charge of about $600 per million gallons of diverted
runoff.
10.The District will consider reducing the capital facilities charge if the project
proponent incorporates water conservation measures (above and beyond
minimum code requirements) that will reduce sewage flows from the
development to offset the volume of runoff diverted to the sewer system.
11.The District will require the implementation of best management practices and
pollution prevention strategies to minimize or eliminate dry weather runoff
from the project. At a minimum, landscaping, lawns, and common areas must
be designed to minimize or eliminate dry weather runoff and minimize or
eliminate the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and other chemicals on common
areas and lawns.
12.The District reserves the right to inspect, monitor, or otherwise gain access to
the diversion structure(s) for the purpose of verifying compliance with the
District's permit requirements.
13.Sewer connections must be made through a local sewering agency and
operation and maintenance of any facilities shall be the responsibility of the
project proponent or local sewering agency.
Staff believes the principles outlined above provide a policy basis for staff review
of runoff diversion requests during the next 12 months and that protects the
District's investment in its capital facilities. During that period, staff will be
developing a permanent policy and ordinance for handling dry weather runoff
diversions to the District's system.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A.
ATTACHMENTS
October 29, 1999 Letter from Assemblyman Scott Baugh
November 30, 1999 Letter to Hearthside Homes
December 2, 1999 Reply to Assemblyman Beugh's Letter
December 9, 1999 Letterto Irvine Ranch Water District
H+i ft�Agm Rp IM6 �R�1b M3
- v Page 4
SACRAMEMO 0IMCE ,�l � DISTRICT OMCE
STATECAPOOL zy$S¢Itt�lr}�J IE BEACHBLVO,SVn` IN
P.O.am Bf2B18 r CCC S HUNTINOTON SEACK CA 92SC]
sACRAMEm.CA w2a9a9e] �I ifornin �Egls.lAfurr (714)813+1W3
(91031&2W Y FAXUU)N3E3TS
1 M(919)31"IU
` 1214fwAc ro 4t1fRs�tt
SCOTT R. BAUGH C op%e- o NDscteDAN
ASSEMBLY REPUBLICAN LEADER MC,ZNTY/L'C
A-,.evasorf Qj1E1�S�E (
�0 on t%/d
VrtON
LA_oa, wi�
October 29, 1999
�NCN M-Atj
Don McIntyre, General Manager TN(T& L-T
Orange County Sanitation District 3,5 4 E Y-ttf LEA A
P.O. Box 8127 N"`Tt�rS p.Es SC.
Fountain Valley, California 92728 0 ��
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
Thank you once again for the participation of Bob Ghirelll and Blake Anderson in the
forum that I hosted on October 7, 1999. The presentation and technical assistance they
offered went above and beyond what I had anticipated,but circumstances were such that
their expert testimony became an integral part of the educational forum. Both gentleman
showed the utmost professionalism, and the forum would not have been as informative
without their full participation.
But they say that no good dead goes unpunished. The forum,which centered in large
part around the issue of the impact of stormwater/urban runoff on beach closures and public
health, also addressed the critical question:What do we do next? Some of the suggestions,
comments and questions turned to the question of diversion. That is, specifically,diverting
dry weather stormwater flows to the OCSD treatment works. The immediate question was:
"Can the treatment system handle dry weather flows? According to Mr.Ghirelli and Mr.
Blake, diversion was actually used to evaluate the Impact that strategy would have on
bacterial counts. However, I had the distinct impression that it was done on a limited basis
and for a limited time. So, in order to gather information with the ultimate intent of crafting
legislation designed to develop solutions to this critical issue, I am formally requesting
answers to the following questions:
1.What impact would result from using the treatment system for dry weather diversions for
stormwater drains in the OCSD service area? Would the treatment works and/or the
collection and distribution system need to be expanded? What additional capital costs would
be incurred from a dry weather flow diversion strategy? What additional operating costs
would result from such a diversion strategy? What funding strategies could be employed,
including the funding plan to pay for the limited diversion this past summer, and the potential
use of state funds in the future(either new or existing funds,or speculative funds, including
water bond funding)?
2.What similar type of cost analysis results from evaluating diversion as a year-round"(wet
and dry weather flow)strategy? Some members in attendance pointed out that California
had been"lucky"that it had not generally combined its stormwater and sewerage systems
into a single system. They compared the"West Coast experience"to the"East Coast
problems"with respect to the potential for system overoad during wet weather flows. The
sum of the comments was that a diversion strategy presents its own unique set of"issues." It
will be important for policy-makers to understand those issues and whatever information you
SERVING THE COMMUNITIES OF HUAMNOrDNS ..CYPRESS,SEAL BEACH.LOSA n VS,LA R1L.NA.ROSSMOOR.FOUMAIN VALLEY
R1nfe0.R.7r PaR91
Don McIntyre
Page 2
could provide my office on those issues would be greatly appreciated.
I recognize that this request Is somewhat extensive. However, I also understand that the
OCSD is in the midst, or has recently concluded, its 20-year master plan update,and I am
hopeful generating this information will not constitute a great burden on the district. Whatever
Information can be provided in a 30-day tlmeframe would be greatly appreciated.
Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Peter Crandall of my staff
at 916-319-2067. Thank you again for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Assembly Repu n Leader
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
November 30, 1999
Pismo: Ed Mountford
(714)SM-2411 Sr. Vice President
a,dunD w,e.,
Hearthside Homes, Inc.
Ba e"i e127 6 Executive Circle, Suite 250
�."teln Vdley,ra 9272B,B127 Irvine, CA 92614
�-..
3 101344185. SUBJECT: Dry Weather Runoff from the Warner Mesa Project
Pounsin V"Iley 04
82M.7018
This letter is in response to your letter dated November 16, 1999 regarding
the proposed diversion of dry weather runoff from the Warner Mesa Project
Ifismsisr into the Orange County Sanitation District (District) sanitary sewer system.
Ygeedes The District is committed to our mission of protecting the public health and
environment, including participation in watershed management issues such
0ish. as urban runoff.
mshern
B e,t B. The District has reviewed the information in your letter, and offers the
ovress following response:
Fc.mm Velley
FOareen
nn+l"+" afeb 1. Hearthside has proposed five points of diversion with five control valves.
te s.. n The District prefers that the number of diversion connections be kept to a
hvn.
is 1e6r
i.Pelm. dY minimum. The District will need to verify that the valve is closed and
Los al rotas locked prior to any rain events to prevent wet weather flow from entering
"'"P° aB°°ch the sanitary sewer. The connection pornt(s)will need to provide for
Po+teneB sampling, installation of a flow monitor, a lockable valve operator, and a
Sense Me
Bed eaten grate or screen to prevent debris from entering the sanitary sewer. A
pumped diversion is preferred to guarantee that no troublesome debris
vu:r. would get into the District's system.
mrn.�Ma.
ess+. .� Dr.sae 2. The District agrees that Fossil Filters, or another control technology may
be required to remove grease and oil. What type of ongoing maintenance
e.1tery Dlstritia is required for the filters, and who will be responsible?
ce.w Ms.e
hf�w on' 3. The District will accept dry weather flows only. The District will not accept
Water Districts wet weather runoff into the sanitary sewer system, including the "first
wlrv;ne a..M flush".
'r.Procsce Or WW.i4eeeh ens Me Emtr. .t cvcWh&,cfl lu.'e in we.nwaeer 51s1cmC
Ed Mountford
Page 2
November 30, 1999
4. Initial approval of the diversion will be for a 12-month period. The District's
Board of Directors will consider renewal following the first year of diversion
to determine whether a long term policy of diverting dry weather flow is
appropriate.
5. During the first year, the District will charge an O&M cost of about $400
per million gallons of diverted runoff. The District may also charge a
capital facilities charge of about $600 per million gallons.
6. The District will consider waiving the capital charges if the development
incorporates water conservation measures (above and beyond minimum
code requirements) that will reduce sewage flows from the development to
offset the estimated 15,000 gallons per day of dry weather runoff. For
example, the developer could provide horizontal axis washing machines,
low flow sink aerators, water saving water heaters, etc.
7. The District will require that landscaping and grading of common areas
and lawns be designed to minimize or eliminate dry weather runoff. The
development will also be required to minimize or eliminate the use of
potentially toxic fertilizers and pesticides on common areas and lawns.
8. The District would have, at its sole discretion, the ability to discontinue any
diversion.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Herberg in the Engineering
Dep ent at (714) 593-7310.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
DAL:JDH:jo
Fi.lwp.dt %engt720Merberg%earthsidenmof re ponse.dm
c: B. Anderson
R. Ghirelli
N. Arhontes
D. Webb, City of Huntington Beach
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
December 2, 1999
(]1N 9e24411 Honorable Scott R. Baugh
A Iwv .. Assembly Republican Leader
eo a 8127 California Slate Assembly
raerc.m wimy.M 16052 Beach Blvd., Suite 160
9272"127 Huntington Beach, CA 92647
.ra...aervc
SUBJECT: Urban Runoff Diversions
Fauneain veuey.CA
927W7ote
This letter is a partial response to your October 29, 1999 letter that requested
information regarding the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) ability to
manage urban runoff within our service area. As part of our mission to protect public
y...a. health and the environment, the District is committed to participating in watershed
s management solutions to the problem of urban runoff and beach closures.
M.
The District would like to thank you for your interest in urban runoff water quality
" issues, particularly as they affect the safety of our local beaches. The District is in the
&'+ process of developing a dry-weather urban runoff nuisance flow diversion policy.
Lam.+ However, diverting urban runoff to the sanitary sewer system is only a partial solution
rO1"'w"' Vft to this problem. Diversions are one element of a broader range of pollution
G. prevention approaches involving the development, implementation, and enforcement
of best management practices aimed at reducing the amount of bacteria, viruses.
pesticides, metals, and other toxic materials in urban runoff.
Le HWe
La Palma
Los aemros In the meantime, because of our recent experience in Huntington Beach and our
aMW desire to support the efforts of the tour and cities in the watershed, the District is
+vs PP h
vreoe+v+ developing a formal nuisance flow permitting policy to accommodate this need in the
future. In developing this policy, there are several issues that the District must
seer eaen
Aenme consider to ensure we continually live up to our mission of protecting public health
and the environment. For instance, the District has an ocean discharge permit issued
y ° jointly by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Regional Water Quality
Control Board. Maintaining compliance with the permit's discharge limits is one of the
een0y a O" . District's highest priorities. The permit has very strict limitations (in some cases
stricter than drinking water standards) that the District's treated effluent must meet
utuey Di.ur+n before i1 is discharged to the ocean.
MY Because the District's sewage treatment plants utilize a biological treatment process,
w.u+ eraeetm toxics are not completely removed from the treated waste stream. Instead, the
District depends on a highly effective industrial waste control program that limits the
1rvm aazh amount of toxic compounds that industries are allowed to discharge into the District's
sewage system. Urban runoff is known to contain toxic residential pesticides and
heavy metals that could put the District's compliance with its permit in jeopardy. As a
result, the District will need to look at inventive ways to ensure that dry-weather
nuisance flows do not jeopardize compliance with our discharge permit.
'To Protect tM NAX HeakA erM the Ene+ormem Ormgh b effen e m wastewater Systems"
Honorable Scott R. Baugh
Page 2 of 3
December 2, 1999
The District is beginning to accept dry-weather nuisance flows as evidenced by the
recent diversion of several storm drain pump stations owned by the City of Huntington
Beach. We are working with the Orange County Health Care Agency and Public
Facilities and Resources Department to identify priority storm drain "hot spots"that
should be considered for diversion into the sewer system for treatment and ocean
disposal. At this point,we have not decided on a fee structure nor water quality
discharge requirements for these diversions.
Capacity impacts were another topic you referenced in your letter. As you have
noted, the District adopted a new 20-year Strategic Plan on October 27, 1999. While
the Strategic Plan is a comprehensive planning document, it did not study collection
and treatment of dry-weather or wet-weather urban runoff. The Strategic Plan studies
did, however, quantify the existing capacity and future requirements for the District's
sewers and treatment facilities.
Generally, the District's sewers have unused capacity during the dry-weather season.
This extra capacity is designed for handling peak wet-weather flows, which are more
than twice as high as the average dry-weather sewage flow. In many cases, this
extra capacity could be used for conveying dry-weather urban runoff to the District's
treatment facilities. Similarly, the treatment plants have unused capacity during dry-
weather flows, but to a lesser degree than the sewer pipelines.
On the other hand, collection and treatment of peak wet-weather urban runoff would
most likely overwhelm the District's facilities. In recent years, municipalities in the
United States have moved away from combining storm sewers and sanitary sewers in
response to EPA requirements to eliminate wet-weather sewage spills, which are also
a cause of beach closures. In fact, the District is working cooperatively with the 23
cities in its service area to fund projects that minimize the inflow of storm water into
the sewer system during wet-weather. Finding permanent, year-round solutions to
the urban runoff problem would be a better approach than creating a combined sewer
system and the problems associated with its operation.
Due to the magnitude and complexity of this issue, we are unable to provide you with
a definitive estimate of the cost to divert nuisance flows to the sewer system.
However, we can calculate a rough-estimate cost based on a small-scale project the
District is presently constructing to divert nuisance flows entering Upper Newport Bay.
The preliminary estimate of the cost to construct a small diversion from a storm drain
to the District's sewer is roughly$100,000. Assuming that there are about 20 similar
diversions to be made throughout the District's service area, the one time cost to
divert flows would be about$2,000,000. In addition, the District's on-going capital
and operational costs for collecting and treating the flow would be roughly$1,000,000
per year.
Honorable Scott R. Baugh
Page 3 of 3
December 2, 1999
Additional studies to identify diversion points, quantify nuisance Flows to be diverted,
and verify the available sewer capacity at the point of diversion will be required to
adequately address the impacts of these diversions on the District's system. For
example, treating all the urban runoff in the District's service area would include
diverting the flows of the San Gabriel and Santa Ana Rivers along with smaller drains
located in the District's service area. These large flows could not be accommodated
by the District's system, even during dry-weather.
The District is working with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach to
develop more definitive cost estimates and will provide those to you within 60 days.
Again, thank you for your continuing interest in this issue. We look forward to
continuing to work with you and your staff on this important issue in Orange County.
Please call me at 714-593-7100 or Bob Ghirelli, the District's Director of Technical
Services, at 714-593-7400, if we may be of further assistance.
t�Donal clgere�General Manager
DFMUH/DEH:mcm
c+�o�uo*r a�ucN�[*r[n.occ
c: Jim Silva, Supervisor, County of Orange
David P. Garofalo, Mayor, City of Huntington Beach
Peter Green, Councilman, City of Huntington Beach
Ray Silver, City Administrator, City of Huntington Beach
Bob Beardsley, Public Works Director, City of Huntington Beach
Ken Smith, Deputy Director, County of Orange, PRFD
Larry Honeyboume, Orange County Health Care Agency
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Phase: December 9, 1999
(714)962-2411
mailing address;
PQ B.6127
Pouncain Valley.Cli
92726-6127 Mr. Greg Heiert7
at,«t.m,<ss: Director of Engineering
1B844 era Avan. Irvine Ranch Water District
Pouncaln Vall,G
9279E-0B1fi 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, CA 92718
SUBJECT: Diversion of Dry Weather Urban Runoff to the Orange County
Washer Sanitation District Treatment Plant
Atgencies
9 1 am pleased to respond to your recent request regarding the diversion of dry
cities weather urban runoff to the OCSD's Wastewater Treatment Facilities. You have
nnahaim inquired about the feasibility of our accepting dry weather runoff from the Los
area Trancos and Muddy Canyon drainage areas of the Newport Coast. I understand
Buena Park that this proposal is for a drainage area consisting of approximately 1500 dwelling
Founmm Valle, units, 1100 resort units, portions of golf courses and a recreation center with a
Fmlarmn stable. I further understand that the anticipated dry weather flow rate of the
Garden cave diversion will be 150 gallons per minute and that the proposal is for only the
-lonGarde Beacn 9 P P P Y dry
Irnna weather portion of the year(April 15 to October 15).
Le Habra
Las Palma
Laa A/amima Our direct experience with this practice is limited. Dry weather urban runoff
NewPnrt Beath diversion facilities are now operating in the Dunes Area of Newport Bay and at four
orange storm water um stations that normal) discharge into the Talbert Channels stem
Placanaa pump Y r9 Y
Sen.Ana located within the City of Huntington Beach. We have no long term operating
Seat Beech experience with this practice. As a result, our Board of Directors has not et
5mmm� P P Y
madn formulated a long term standing policy to which we can look for advice on how to
u°a Pan: handle your request. They do intend to formulate such a policy next year, after
Yorbe Linda
reviewing our ongoing experience with this practice. Absent along-term policy,we
:nuacy of orange intend to bring the matter to the Board of Directors next week as described more
fully below.
.miter, Districts
ccam Maas There are obvious public policy advantages to intercepting and treating runoff from
Midway cty developed areas that would otherwise impact public health and the environment
Water Districts On the other hand, if such a practice threatens the long-term reliability of the
sanitary wastewater treatment facilities to which they are diverted, then there is an
Irnne Pencn
'ID Protect the Public Heelrh and Me Environment through Excellence in Wastewater Systems'
n,.
'.�. Mr. Greg Heiertz
Page 2 i
December 9, 1999
obvious conflict of purposes that must be resolved in some way. We have found
that every proposal similar to this one does imply a considerable risk to regional
wastewater treatment facilities unless the practice is operated under highly
restrictive terms and conditions.
We are particularly concerned with winter hydraulic demands on our system.
Storms in the wet season increase demands on our wastewater treatment capacity.
We experience wintertime peak flows that are as much as 2.1 times greater than
average dry weather flows. This quickly overwhelms the hydraulic capacity of our
facilities and could cause overflows of sanitary sewage into the ocean. Because of
this potential problem and the drastic consequences to the environment, OCSD will
not accept storm flows. We are actively working to exclude all storm water-related
flows to our system including inflow and infiltration by an aggressive capital program
to repair leaking sewers and manholes. We prohibit the intentional discharge of
storm water of any kind to our facilities for the same reason. This would include
"first flush" storm water. I understand that the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service has proposed this for the Newport Coast. First flush storm water caries
with it too much hydraulic risk to our facilities. At this point, I cannot conceive of a
circumstance that would justify accepting first flush flow in light of the risks that such
a practice would imply.
While our Board of Directors has yet to develop a unified long tern policy on the
acceptance of dry weather urban runoff into the OCSD system, I believe that they
will ultimately insist that every proposal must first demonstrate an actual public
health or environmental problem that can not be otherwise reasonably solved by
another practice. From what has been related informally to us by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board,the Newport Coast projects seem to meet this
criterion. We are concerned that the practice of diverting dry weather urban flows
into our system does not unreasonably proliferate to the point that it can no longer
be managed. We are committed to maintaining our ability to monitor all future
diversions so that we can preclude the entry of storm water whenever it rains. For
this reason, I believe that our Board's long-tern policy will be highly selective and
that only those projects that are justified by a real need will be approved for
connection and operation.
In response to your inquiry, I am referring this matter to our Board of Directors,
which meets on the evening of December 15,with a recommendation that it
conditionally approve your issuance of a permit to The Irvine Company for the
discharge of dry weather urban runoff from the Muddy Creek and Trancos Canyon
drainage areas for the period of April 15 through October 15. The precise terms and
conditions of such a permit will have to meet the approval of OCSD prior to The
Irvine Company making the connection and commencing operation.
Mr. Greg Heiertz
Page 3
December 9, 1999
1 hope that this letter has served to clarify our position on this matter. Please
contact Blake Anderson or me if you have any questions
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
H n nmP Kado,..�d.,m...ez
c: Sat Tamaribuchi, The Irvine Company
Teresa Henry, Coastal Commission
Jan Debay, Chair, OCSD Board of Directors
i
W DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE
SEWER SERVICE USER FEE REFUNDS MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, December 8, 1999
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Sewer Service User Fee Refunds of the
Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, December 8, 1999 at 4
p.m., in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Director John Gullixson
Tom Saltarelli, Ad Hoc Chair Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Peer Swan
Lynn Daucher STAFF PRESENT:
Donald McIntyre, General Manager
Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
None Mike While, Controller
Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General
Manager
Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
This is the first meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee; therefore there are no minutes.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting >V
Page 2
December 8, 1999
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager did not make a report.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS— Item A
A. Consideration of policy concerning refunds of sewer service user fees paid by property
owners not connected to the sewerage system
There are some properties in the District's service area that are on septic systems that
have been charged sewer service user fees through the property tax bills issued by the
County Tax Collector. At the present time there are two policies in place regarding
refunds and credits. After discussing the options, it was decided to recommend the
following to the Board of Directors:
Consider a policy offering refunds to vested property owners not connected to the
sewerage system for sewer service user fees previously paid, plus interest.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
There is no need for additional meetings of the Ad Hoc Committee re Sewer Service User Fee
Refunds.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
i
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 3
December 8, 1999
There was no closed session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
Tappan, ActingACorfinnittee Secretary
em�,n.�aHmna we camv'rce.swasevreuarre.a�un+xew m�n.,.as
AD HOC COMMITTEE Meeting Cate To Be.of Dir.
I2/0e/99 u/I5/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
a(a) 25(c)(3)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE USER FEE REFUNDS TO NON-USERS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of policy concerning refunds of sewer service user fees paid by property
owners not connected to the sewerage system.
SUMMARY
In July 1999, the FAHR Committee and the Board considered requests for refunds of
sewer service fees incorrectly collected from property owners who were not connected
to the sewerage system. After considerable discussion, including presentations from
property owners and advice from General Counsel, the Directors adopted a policy.
The policy was to provide a credit in an amount equal to all sewer service user fees
collected for a property, plus interest (a total of$716.00), to any property connecting to
the local sewer system prior to September 1, 2003. In lieu of this credit, a property
owner would be eligible to receive a refund of fees paid by that property owner, plus
interest, back to the 1995-96 fiscal year(a maximum of$330). The refund period was
established after considering the General Counsel's report on the applicable statute of
limitations.
In September 1999, the Board considered and approved a Director's request to have
the FAHR Committee reconsider the four-year limitation for refunds. The FAHR
Committee heard further presentations by property owners and General Counsel at their
October meeting. The Committee voted to establish an ad hoc committee to review the
legal requirements and opportunities to extend the refund period beyond the current
four-year limit to include whatever period the property owner could establish having
made the payments.
Attached are excerpts from the Government Code that may be helpful. Sections 5096
and 5097 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code are appropriate, because the
sewer service user fee is collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill.
These Sections provide a four-year window for refunds. Government Code Section
53062 provides that"no statute of limitations shall apply to claims for fees paid before
January 1, 1992." General Counsel has reported that this Section provides no special
guidance for fees paid subsequent to January 1, 1992.
HA"dlaSd—dalBand Agenda a*{abA1fWewN Agenda R"pmb�l�m] gcc
Reused. a Page 1
Since July, staff has received 268 responses to the letters we mailed to known septic
tank users in Yorba Linda, and an additional 28 requests from property owners in other
cities. Of these 296 requests, only 28 were for credits to apply toward capital facilities
capacity charges. The vast majority was for the four-year, or lesser period, refunds.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The maximum refund potential is approximately $650,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Government Code Section 53082
2. Health & Safely Code Sections 5096 & 5097
H:Fwq dlaWOeMa'HwN Agenda Rep %1000 Board Agenda RapaNIXKallenn 2k.dm
RWW Baoree Paget
h
t
GOVERNMEM'CODE
§53082. Refund of sewer service fees -
(a) By.July 1,199,1, local agencies.shall refund any sewer service fees collected
for which no services were de$vered:::..:' •. , � ... .-
(b) Any sewer service fees'collected by.a,local agency from any person for
which no service has been provided shall be refunded in accordance with
subdivisions (c) and (d).
_ (c) In lases where a person paid fees as described in subdivision (a)"and is still
residing at the same-locatitin; it.shall be the responsibility of the local,agency,
upon determination that the premises is not connected to the sewer system, to
return fees in their entirety, regardless of the amount of time the fees were
wrongly collected. For the purposes of this section, if the exagt amount,of the
charges is not readily_available, the amount of the refund may be calculated by
averaging the rates paid by payersin the same classification during the time
period in which the fees were.collected.
(d) In cases where a person paid fees as described in subdivision (a) butis-not
still residing at the same location,*the payer of the fees may make a claim for a
refund to the agency collecting the fees.. -
(e)1Vo statute ojlimita[ioies.shallapply to claims forfees paid before January,
1, 1992. For fees paid on or after January 1, 1992, claims shall be filed within
180 days of the date of payment
.(f) As used in this section, "sewer service fees" means periodic fees,`' togs,
rates, rentals, or other charges imposed by local agencies for the purpose of
covering the cost to provide sewer service or to operate, maintain, repair, and
replace sewer systems and facilities, but do not include any of the following:
(1) Sewer standby_or availability. barges or assessmen c - -. ts,• _
(2) Special assessments levied in accordance with o 1.ne or a combinadan of the
Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) of the
Streets and Highways Code), the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Divi-
sion 12 (commencing with-Section 10000) of the Streets and Highways.Code);
or the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 (commencing with Section
8500) of the Streets and Highways Code).
(3) Sewer connection charges or sewer capacity charges paid in conjunction
with or as a condition of approving an application for sewer service.
Added Scats 1990 ch 1558 §3(SB 1821).Amended Stars 1991 ch 1226§8(SB 767). "
Amendments:
1991 Amendment: (1)Added "sewer service" after -Any" a the beginning of subd(b);(2)added rpm
detemunation that the premises is not mntected to the sewer system;' in the fast seotenee in subd(c); (3)
Meted the former second sentence in subd(d)which tad: "No statute of limitations as to those claims shin
apply. and(4)added subds(e)and(f). - ...
REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE
f
§ 5096. Refund of taxes under specified conditions
Any taxes paid before or after delinquency shall be refunded if they
were:
(a) Paid more than once.
(b) Erroneously or illegally collected.
(c) Illegally assessed or levied.
(d) Paid on an assessment in excess of the ratio of assessed value to the
full value of the property as provided in Section 401 by reason of the
assessor's clerical error or excessive or improper assessments attribut-
able to erroneous property information supplied by the assessee.
(e) Paid on an assessment of improvements when the improvements did
not exist on the lien date.
(f) Paid on an assessment in excess of the equalized value of the prop-
erty as determined pursuant to Section 1613 by the county board of
equalization.
(g) Paid on an assessment in excess of the value of the property as
determined by the assessor pursuant to Section 469.
§ 5097. Refund claims; Verification and filing
(a) No order for a refund under this article shall be made, except on a
claim:
(1) Verified by the person who paid the tax, his or her guardian, execu.
tor, or administrator.
(2) Filed within four years after making of the payment sought to be
refunded or within one year after the mailing of notice as prescribed in
Section 2635, or the period agreed to as provided in Section 532.1,
whichever is later.
(b) An application for a reduction in an assessment filed pursuant to
Section 1603 shall also constitute a sufficient claim for refund under
this section if the applicant states in the application that the applica-
tion is intended to constitute a claim for refund. If the applicant does
not so state, he or she may thereafter and within the period provided
in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) file a separate claim for refund of
taxes extended on the assessment which applicant applied to have
reduced pursuant to Section 1603 or Section 1604.
(c) If an application for equalization of an escape assessment is filed
pursuant to Section 1603, a claim may be filed on any taxes resulting
from the escape assessment or the original assessment to which the
escape relates within the period provided in paragraph (2) of subdivi-
sion (a)or within 60 days from the date the board of equalization makes
its final determination on the application, whichever is later.
Enacted 1939.Amended State 1963 ch 2077§4;Stats tat Ex Sess 1966 ch 147§98;Stets 1967
ch 746§2; Stats 1970 eh 540§2; Slats 1975 eh 224 § 13.5; Stab 1976 ch 499§2;Stats 1979
ch 732 §6.5; Stats 1983 ch 1224 §35.5;Stats 1994 ch 946 §26, effective September 10, 19S4;
Slats 1987 ch 1194 §23,operative July 1, 1989.
S I A IF OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on 6�& 19Lfwasduly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ULCL h ��c 191
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this -f day of
)
Penny M. Kyle, cretary
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HAW P.DTAIADM1NMST0RMS\F27A
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
y '*
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
December B, 1999 Board Secretary
rnons:
17141 962-2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
araill osastev:
Po. Box B127 Subject: Board Letter
rWntaa valley.Ck
92)2B-B12)
'onst"Bilatltliai The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
toeaa Bra Avern,e 9 Y Y 9
rwmeain Valley.nA information on any of the items, please call me.
92]09-)018
Executive Management Retreat: Preparing for the Future
rw.e.n.r Blake and I have called for a management retreat that will be conducted the last week
Agencies of January. We are using the services of a management-consulting firm to help us
• prepare for the retreat. All members of the EMT will attend a 2 1l2 training session
cities ahead of the retreat to learn some management tools that we will be applying at the
retreat and afterwards. All members of the EMT will establish self-improvement goals
anah. in the training sessions. They will also refine the goals of their individual departments
area
Buena Perk with the help of the other members of the EMT at the retreat. The retreat will be the
Plural kickoff for the budgeting, staffing, and critical goal setting processes that we
F°a"`a'" amen undertake beginning in the first quarter of eve calendar year. It is our purpose to
FaVal, 9 9 Q every Y P rP
cards.crasa integrate and coordinate all of our planning efforts into a single coherent process. We
Hurtungwa Beach hope to streamline the process at the same time.
Irene
La Habra
Le Paling Another thing we will be doing to prepare for the retreat is to interview the Steering
Loa aamnva Committee of the Board, the members of the EMT, and some of the division
Ahanat t Beach
charge managers who work for the EMT. The purpose of these interviews is to develop a
Placentia deeper understanding of what we are doing well, what we need to improve, and what
stateaW
B""ech a
Seal B critical objectives we should first undertake during the next year. Blake and I believe
e
Santa', that this retreat will be an essential first step in establishing a clear vision for the new
rva°^ leadership team that will emerge as a result of the departure of Ed Hodges, Mike
ro eerk
Pea Petennan and myself
County of Orange
One More Reason for the Ground Water Replenishment System
Barite, Districts
casra Maas The State's water supply industry met in San Diego during the first week of
MiCwey cry December. One of the major themes of the conference of the Association of
Water Districts Califomia Water Agencies (ACWA)was the uncertainty of future water supply.
Presenters concluded that we are less prepared for a drought today then any other
Irma Banah time in the recent past. Urban and agricultural demands continue to increase while
restrictions on water supply from the Colorado River and the California Bay-Delta
system also increase. This is one more reason why the water supply independence
that is provided by GWRS is so important to the welfare of Orange County. See the
attached materials that include a news article from the San Diego Union Tribune and
handouts from the ACWA meeting.
Ti,Protect rre Pualm Health and the Ennronment throbgh Eviceneace,n Wastewater Systems'
i
Members of the Board
Page 2
December 8, 1999
More Than 6,600 Low-Flow Toilets Distributed During Two-Month Period
During October and November some 6,672 ultra-low-Flush toilets were distributed free
of charge to residents in the District's service area. As part of our water-conservation
efforts, we have been helping to underwrite the cost of those toilets, along with the
Orange County Water District, the Municipal Water District of Orange County and the
Metropolitan Water District. You will recall that a toilet giveaway was held at the
District in October, and some 1,500 units were distributed. It is estimated that each
ultra-low-Bush unit will reduce the amount of influent by an average of 30 gallons per
year. The toilet giveaway program will continue through April. Below is the city-by-
city breakdown for the months of October and November:
Anaheim 1908 La Palma 5
Brea 21 Newport Beach 24
Buena Park 49 Orange 148
Fountain Valley 925 Santa Ana 2252
Fullerton 52 Seal Beach 8
Garden Grove 292 Tustin 78
Huntington Beach 603 Westminster 130
Irvine Ranch WD 107 Yorba Linda 57
La Habra 13
A BriefrnalTrainina Opportunity for Directors
The National Water Research Institute (NWRI) and the NWRI Corporate Associates,
in collaboration with the California Department of Health Services, will sponsor a two-
day symposium on ultraviolet (UV) technology Thursday and Friday, January 27
and 28, at the DoubleTree Hotel in Costa Mesa. Directors might find the first day of
the symposium of benefit, as UV will be used to treat water for the Groundwater
Replenishment System.
Ultraviolet disinfection is a term that you often hear associated with the proposed
Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) project. If you are interested in having
a much more thorough understanding of the issues regarding UV disinfection, then
this is a very good opportunity for you. Day two will dive so deeply into the technical
issues that it would probably not be useful for most directors. If you interested, look
to the conference information attached to this Board Letter. To find out more about
the symposium, please contact Michelle Tuchman, (714) 593-7120.
Members of the Board
Page 3
December 8, 1999
Manure Management Regulatory Update
Attached to this month's Board package is a recent Fresno Bee article that describes
the ongoing efforts to address the growing problem of manure management in
California's Central Valley. After successfully implementing wastewater regulations
for industry, the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) is in the process of
developing regulations for dairies, and other concentrated animal operations, in order
to prevent nitrates and salts from polluting water resources. To prepare for EPA's
efforts, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is coordinating an effort
to foster environmental stewardship among dairy operators. The SWRCB plans on
developing a program that will certify dairies meet federal criteria for waste
management. Such certification will help to assure compliance before state and
federal enforcement commences.
Biosolids Update
Kern County Litigation
The petition challenging the Kern County biosolids ordinance was filed on
November 8 in the Kern County Superior Court. A motion to transfer the case out of
Kern County will be heard on December 7. Kern County's answer to the petition on
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) causes is due on January 27.
District's counsel believes that the case will be heard starting in late February. Due to
swift hearing of CEQA-based lawsuits by the courts, counsel has recommended
against pursuing a temporary restraining order(TRO) or a stay from the enforcement
of the ordinance. Pursuit of a TRO or a stay may result in a judge, not knowledgeable
in the science supporting biosolids, blemishing the record by rejecting the TRO or the
stay. Counsel recommends complying with the ordinance under protest while the
court determines if Kern County needs to prepare an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR).
Imperial and Kings County Ordinances
Imperial County is in the process of drafting a biosolids ordinance that will ban all
forms of biosolids products, including biosolids compost. The Imperial County
Environmental Evaluation Committee will make a determination on December 23 on
the level of CEQA review necessary after which public comment will be accepted for
30 days. After the comments are reviewed, Imperial County will schedule a public
hearing on the ordinance before the ordinance is presented to the Board of
Supervisors for adoption.
Currently Kings County does not have direct regulatory authority over the two sites
where biosolids are being land applied. Due to the increase in regulatory activity
related to dairy byproducts, Kings County is in the process of developing an ordinance
Y
Members of the Board
Page 4
December 8, 1999
for the agricultural use of manure. To be consistent, Kings County wishes to develop
an ordinance for biosolids, similar to that for manure management, that will provide
them with local oversight authority. District's staff will provide technical support to
Kings County during this process.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Order and EIR
The SWRCB is in the process of reviewing numerous comments of the draft versions
of the General Order and its associated EIR. The SWRCB is expected to release a
modified General Order and a final EIR by late February. One public workshop will be
held in Sacramento in late March. The final General Order is expected to be adopted,
and the EIR certified by the SWRCB in June. Please note that the General Order will
regulate the land application of biosolids on the Kings County portion of Tule Ranch.
Yakima Compost Site and Tule Ranch Agreements
As directed by the Board on November 17, District's staff and counsel is in the
process of finalizing the contracts for biosolids management, site purchase, and
purchase options for the Yakima compost site and Tule Ranch. The local press has
noted these activities. An article by The Bakersfield Californian on the proposed
Yakima compost facility has been attached for your review. The article cites initial
opposition to the site by a resident that lives 3.5 miles from the property. The
purchase of the Kings County portion of Tule Ranch is also being researched by The
Fresno Bee. District's staff has been working with The Fresno Bee reporter in order
to provide accurate information on the site and the science supporting biosolids land
application.
Update on the California Water Bond
Voters will head to the polls this March to vote on numerous Bonds and Initiatives
including the California Water Bond (Assembly Bill 1584). As you may recall, the
District's Board of Directors supported adoption of a Water Bond that included the
"SAWPA Plan." The Bond does contain $235 million for the Southern California
Integrated Watershed Program. This money may be allocated to the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority, upon appropriation by the Legislature to the State Water
Resources Control Board. The following projects are allowed under the bond:
• Basin water banking
• Contaminant and salt removal through reclamation and desalting
• Removal of nonnative plants and the creation of new open space and wetlands
• Programs for water conservation and efficiency, and storm water capture and
management
Members of the Board
Page 5
December 8, 1999
Planning and implementation of a Flood control program to protect agricultural
operations and adjacent property to assist in abating the effects of waste
discharges.
The District will likely seek funding for the Groundwater Replenishment system under
this and other appropriate sections of the Water Band.
The bond also has $4 million as a part of its Coastal Nonpoint Source Control
Program for Huntington Beach. This provides for monies to the City of Huntington
Beach to fund multi-agency studies to establish recommendations to address coastal
nonpoint source pollution in the tidal marshes and coastal waters, and to implement
these recommendations. Agencies authorized to conduct the studies include cities,
counties, Flood control districts and sanitation districts. The District could receive
monies from this program to fund research regarding beach closures along
Huntington Beach.
The bond totals $1.97 billion, and it contains numerous other provisions that may
benefit the District and the local watershed. These provisions include the Watershed
Protection Program, Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program, Clean Water
Program, Seawater Intrusion Control, River Protection Program, Water and
Watershed Education Program, Groundwater Storage, Water Recycling Program,
Water Conservation Program, and Flood Protection Programs.
Odor and Noise Complaints
We continue to receive calls from neighbors of both treatment plants and several from
various locations in the service area. O&M staff responds to each one in an attempt
to identify and correct the problem. I'm enclosing an article from the Southeast
Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association's newsletter that discusses our Strategic
Plan and encourages homeowners to register complaints about sewage or chemical
odors. As a result, this increased awareness may result in an increase in complaints.
Sewage Trouble at the Vatican
I want to call your attention to an enclosed Wall Street Journal article on water and
wastewater at the Vatican entitled, The Sewage Trouble at the Holy See is Soaking
Investors. This points out one of the problems facing privatized wastewater
companies and the impact on profits.
Members of the Board
Page 6
December 8, 1999
Y2K Update
Attached is a December 2 memo from Patrick Miles on plans for New Year's Eve.
CHP Certificate of Achievement
The District has received a Certificate of Achievement awarded by the CA Highway
Patrol for five consecutive Satisfactory Ratings since 1991 in the biennial motor
carrier safety compliance inspection program. It is recognition for the good job our
fleet services staff does.
Published Articles of Interest
I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. A
notebook will be available at the Board meeting in the Board Room that contains
other articles of interest.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
C
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM.jt
M%WP.OT�PNlMO FME SMT EWOM 12lS WC
Attachments
SlgnUn San Ulego State/The Region — State said open to danger of drought Page 1 of 2
State said open to danger of drought
Vulnerability seen worse than in '87
By Steve La Rue
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
December 2, 1999
SAN DIEGO — Diversions of water to help restore fish, wetlands
and other environmental assets have left California more
vulnerable to drought than it was in 1987, when the state's last
severe dry spell began, urban and agricultural water leaders said
here yesterday.
"We are in much worse shape than we were in 1987," said
Stephen Hall, executive director of the Association of California
Water Agencies, representing water agencies in cities and farms.
The year 1987 marked the start of a six-year drought that killed
landscaping businesses in Southern California, caused growers
to stump avocado trees in northern San Diego County, and drove
some Northern California salmon and other fish species to the
brink of extinction.
"if we had a repeat of that drought now, we would have impacts
far in excess of what we had then," Hall said.
His comments came at the Town and Country Convention Center
in San Diego during yesterday's biannual convention of the
Association of California Water Agencies.
Population growth has played an important role, but another key
factor has been that about 1.4 million acre-feet of water each
year-- more than the cities of San Francisco, San Diego and Los
Angeles use each year together— has since been devoted to
environmental restoration, Hall said.
"The point is not that we shouldn't have allocated these supplies
to the environment. The point is that we need new supplies," he
said.
An acre-foot is about 326,000 gallons, about enough to serve the
household needs of two families of four for one year.
Jason Peltier, manager of the Central Valley Project Water Users
Association, said residents and businesses in the Silicon Valley,
hftp://www.union-trib.com/news/state/991202-0010-1 n2drought.html 1216/99
SignOn San Diego State/The Region — State said open to danger of drought Page 2 of 2
in Santa Clara County, are likely to get a taste of a future drought
even under normal conditions next year, largely because of the
environmental factor.
Much of the Silicon Valley is supplied by the project, the 1930s-
era system of dams and canals built by the federal government in
Northern and Central California.
Federal legislation by presidential candidate and former U.S.
Sen. Bill Bradley requires that about 12 percent of the project's
water be devoted to the environment. Peltier said this is one
reason the computer industry capital is likely to be scrambling for
water supplies next year. Meanwhile, he said, needed new
reservoirs are not being built.
'This will have a long-range impact on people's economic
decisions, so the cost of not doing anything can be high," Peltier
said. At the same time, he said, Central Valley Project water
supplies also are expected to be short next year for about 1
million acres of Central Valley farmland.
Barry Nelson, senior policy analyst for the Environmental
Defense Council, a nationwide environmental group, said many
water managers see building new dams as an automatic solution
in much the same way water managers did 40 years ago.
Significant shares of the state's water must now be devoted to
repairing the environmental damage that many of those earlier
dams caused, he said, including banishing salmon from the San
Joaquin River and all but eliminating one salmon run on the
Sacramento River.
"The environmental community believes improving water supply
reliability is essential for the economy," Nelson said. But he said
no overall plan for the state's water has been developed and
agreed upon by farmers, urban water users and environmental
advocates.
http:/twww.union-trib.com/news/state/991202-0010-1 n2drought.htmi 12/6199
vi 2dyM
x
sew• �1. - -.^_4 w �`�
E
I
a- •
California's Looming Water Crisis:
A Status Report
Table of Contents
• .. 'r id 1.81• Q.,d :' a-1
ITI ETUT :
1
If1
I . •
Presented by the
Association of California Water Agencies
In a state known for Its historic water wars, the past decade has been extraordinarily tumultuous for
California. A decade ago California's economy and environment were both in jeopardy from a water
system in conflict. Today. we have a clear policy choice: continued conflict or recovery for both
California's economy and environment.
Immediate Investments needed
In water system capacity:
• Shift Della management from regulatory
mandates to flexible operations for multiple
benefits.
v The late 1980s was the last period of "business as usual" for
• Complete South Delta facilities. California water inleresls.Aller years of neglect.the envi-
• Inerease Della pumping capacity, ionmenl was in serious decline and California no longer
had a viable long-term plan lot meeting its water supply,water
• Install fish barrier. quality and environmental needs.
• Install agricultural flow-control barriers. The 1990s; have witnessed a historically unprecedented environ-
• Protect water quality in the South Della. mental restoration effort,and the fisheries are rebounding.
• More than 1.4 million acre-leel of additional water in dry
• Implement groundwaterlstorage programs years has been dedicated lot environmental purposes.
south of the Della.
• Implement programs to improve water quality • $2 billion dollars has been earmarked for environmental
n and Implement
fro the Della. restoration projects.To dale more [ban 250 tesloiation proi
ecls are being implemented,promising dramatic improve-
• Develop a balanced,workable Environmental mends lot fish and wildlife.
Water Account (EWA). Unfortunately Californians have been forced to play a zero-sum
• Plan and build appropriate surface storage game.Waler gains lot lish have translated into water loss lot the
projects economy. Despite the promise of regulatory certainly of the his-
toric 1994 Bay-Della Accord.water supplies for California's urban
2
and agricultural customers continue to decline,while the popula- objectives cannot he met and could further increase demands on
lion over the last decade has increased by over 3 million people. the Della.
• Unless action is taken immediately,the next drought could lit- California Is at risk of trading one crisis
erally dry up major portions of California's agricultural econ- for another. v
omy.with no supplies available lot extended periods. While we have risen to the challenge of [lie environmental crisis �
• Even under normal weather conditions,large portions of the of the 1980s,we have not taken fire necessary actions to avert a
Central Valley will receive barely hall of their historic sup- looming water qua lily and supply crisis.While our investments in
plies. conservation and reclamation have been substantial,they will not
• In the urban economy,the Silicon Valley could lace a double be enough to stem this crisis.
hit with substantial additional losses in both slate and federal Substantial resources are already in place to help stem this cri.
sources of supply. sis.including a proposed $1.91 billion water bond on the March
For urban water users Della water quality is currently inadequate. 2000 ballot.
containing high concentrations of salts and organic compounds Slate and federal leaders must immediately commit to a program
[hat threaten public health and water management efforts.Recent which expands system capacity to assure environmental and eco
actions to protect lisheries have the potential to move water quality nomic balance lot California in the 21 sl Century,
in the wrong direction,resulting in lurlher water quality degrada-
tion.Unless this trend is reversed,public health and water quality
3
A Snapshot of the Decade's Key Water Events
C[NTRAI VALLEY PROJECT
? IMPROVEMENT ACT.
y Bill changes project purpose to
SAFE Ofi NK)NG WATER ACT'. include eavimmneuml reslora
1HM Slmrdard undergoes IM non efforts and opens the door
review [NOANG[R[0 lot water marketnrg
SP[CIESACT:
Winter RunChinook -
£ y T £ N D £ D p R Salmon listed ,
O ,
y n G
ry A�' yd{:gi d T STATE DROUGHT WATER BANK.
�\ ` @ Slate Acquires TAF of
Madel Wateare r
A { T.tEjty C`
tA' N
A R
U r [ v £
d y ,
kl
STAiE WAT[A RESOURCES i�1 -
CONTROL BOARD (�� • , �qr, !�� ��
Bay-0elm Water QualilY&Water
Rights Proceedings begin
tSrseY r "ay WAiEfl SHORTAGES: SEVER[WATER SHORTAGES.
'v �x3) Slate Water Pro ecl- Formers onl [NO OF DROUGHTIO
c I y $tale Water Pralecl � Farmers gel no water deliveries D[CIAR[
' gel 50%of requested supplies Cities get only 30%of requested supplies
r • p vc ; �"'L
BABBITIIDAVIS.
Pledge to develop Ilamewoik for EST& TWA
PORAT
BAY DELIA ACCORD
ernor Wilson&Interior Socialist Babbitt [COSYST[cosign agreement among broad array of Bay. Over $84millionin
Delta interests.Agreement promises environ. projects are Innded
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: mental restoration&water supply certainty FEDERAL FUNDING'
Delta Smell listed Congress fressap LDIRAL IUNOINC:
SINGLE authorizes S430 Congress appropriates$BS
GV6 DRY YEAR million lot CAL FED million in first installment PROP 13
5\a yesy,R 101 CALFED SL97 BIT L ION WA IF R BOND
Qualities for March 2000 hat
lot.Governor Davis pledges
320 million in nedl Year's
yV t budget to study storage 4
y t AA E
. � tl Il r � � F•x 4
q X \ t f
E A
s we et
krri. k IIF, t �i:• i ,
MOte Water
ACA[E MEN 1: n
Sete a con Contractors
ter ors
revise contract terms;
particularly retarding CALF(D BAY-0[L1A
shortages PROGRAM V7 MYo
IAUNCI1l0
CLEAN WATER ACT: Water users propose
CAI 1fO 1'Rf rIRRID
U.S.EPA proposes costly alternative wale) YES VOTE f ON PROP 204 At IIRNA]WI
water quality standards quality standards California voters CVPIAIMPIIMLNTATION CVPIAIMPUMENTAIION framework released
lot Bap Delta which with dramatically approve$995 million Interim interprets CVPIA. Interim revises program
could reduce supplies 6v reduced impacts water band CVP contractors and with dramatically hither CAI If 0 BRA[I Pf IB
up to 4 MAF environmentalists site water sit I costs DIE)
ll IASI1l
5
During the 19809, fisheries were in dire straits. The drought was
becoming more severe, while a growing population was demanding
more supply. In 1989, a crisis was developing and past solutions were
no longer viable. The state faced new problems on every front.
x
•
• • local water suppliers would soon face severe
35 shortages despite investments to stretch existing
supplies.
t Annual Winter-Run • Winter-run Chinook salmon were the first Della
30 Salmon Escapement lish listed under the Endangered Species Act.
.k p Other listings would come later.
to the Upper Sacramento River . Regulators increased restrictions on Della water
'u
25 ' projects to protect lish.
r • California no longer had a viable long-
20 term water supply plan.
0
t 5 to.
• � r , ii"� �Frr t" �p��I�tlNuvyp�.w�',`
z' tU
Pqj y pI� p-
O 1971 1416 19n 1912 190 1911 I%5 190 1217 19" t9e9 ,.'� „ u l i! A.
`�'
195190
Pardee Reservoir during severe drought.
6
The pace of water quality regulations increased dramatically.
focusing even greater concerns about the quality of Delta water.
•
Two-thirds of California's
population receives all or Federally Contaminants
120 ,
a portion of its drinking water (1986 .200 ) 99 103 107
from the Delta. (1986 2004) 66 100
•
80 Z ,
62 Q
60 �.
1 Itz 1 30 31 46 •
22 H
'1 1
tf 20 .
( l ILL x ..
1986 1987 1989 1991 1993 1998 2001 2004
1
Fisheries Are No Longer California Has Launched
In Crisis Unprecedented Restoration
Programs
The nation's most aggressive fishery restoration effort and favor-
able hydrology have significantly improved the picture for Delta Dedicated dly-year (lows for environmental purposes have been
fisheries.The populations of native fish species at risk Irom water increased by 1.4 million acre-leaf, including additional deliveries
project operations have either stabilized or are on the rise, to refuges.
Populations of Key Fisheries Are Increasing Millions of acre-feel of water and billions of dollars for habitat
� P, The return tale of tall-run Chinook salmon on the Sacramento
restoration have been dedicated to improve these fisheries.
River is among the highest in 30 years.
e Stocks of winter-run,spring-run and San Joaquin fall-run Projects Supplying Additional Flows to the Environment
Chinook salmon are also increasing.
.9mwwM[
W IUW Rla•r Rtllwn ln[IYEa:
A.P.
Fevs tletlletlstl R•[ varv.[—
n•Edllell•I •10CIIIenY flew P[M
va muuen.u•.Is•1 s...Mn.m.
Annual Fall Run Escapement m tlrv-vr W.m
m me•nmrenm•m _
� to Sacramento River and Major hlbutarles �I q•.•.Yea
400 R.La..
Mgds-1.
uN Nllunl u 6ERcI
350
M NCIcOerY
300 -
A
250
s o,r,a,�=•o II
200 a }.
150
Fapwl.[UHFI.e I.,A...Pd.
100 � Ec.,nie CV%�-
50 e.r.e..a
QR.We.WMM�
pPa uun Son JoeVn"r Pbp 1[Ilom lntluu.,
y'a 0y .u¢ru[aa dMn.m sM,Jvwuln AN.,Fluty
�) �b �1" •Innn[aefl....vob RICO...VUInn,.n1.I.E PL1
V
California Is In the Midst Of Implementing The Largest Habitat
Restoration Program Ever Conceived
CALFED 1997.1999 PROJECTS Largely as a result of the water
community's initiative. $2 Billion Is now
committed to ecosystem restoration
1 through 2010. •
a�..wl. bNo ..
oo More than 250 ecosystem Improvement
d .�Nra" projects throughout the Bay-Della •
000 °O�"�" watershed are in various stages of •
me eauan
'low °o � Implementation. Hundreds more are E
rN°OMOa" planned for implementation in the t
future.
all
<e.cw,d, jnnHx.M,
omm t®®° Funding Dedicated to
0) ;,,,„, Environmental Restoration
e1�G... mo •
L EOENO
OboN,.9 AnxN
_ OOJ 000 •9ILWNE9,o ..�., eMpiweER9KN cvru n...........I
ee9 Os0 O ® n onwi wm.�n..,.....,n.IM.a
eee G�-eioe m ®�Wa'b R,
e 09� ° oe� e®� Illy, I„�,.I.
O :yw°O p N
O ww Y e�war�uux mr.
,.1 M
n.r lru.All •
M rnniw.m.. GIMn
pO a"��o"bm e• ,..
O 0o'r"'FI°O LL
;°e •dn
U
W.. ,na.�.i.n
rwa.a.' cvru
iw..nu 1992 1993 1994 1999 199fi 1997 2010
Case Study: Butte Creek Projects - Restoring 37 Miles of Fish Habitat
:To improve fish passage for ESA-pr6lecled
migratory corridor
Project cost: $18.000,000 to dale
Western Canal Diversion - Be fore...
...and fter removal of the dam.
Project Outcome: Removed 4 dams,restored 37 miles of 20.000 spring-run Chinook salmon returned versus
hibilat on Butte Creek,constructed state-ol-1he-arl disifibu- only a few hundred in preyious years.
lion system for farmers.
10
N t,
E
t',"f i � Lr �R Spls..-y Yr rN �`'�rE�S�•�F
} , F
F4l"1..
l
Case Study: Sacramento River fish Screens - Offer Safe Passage
For Salmon
Fish screens Increase fish survival.
r � •
C
Project Purpose: To increase survival rates of migratory
fish on the Sacramento River by screening diversions. r'�" - •
L •
i � f r
a 1\
,
•
Installation of consolidated fish screens for •
Princeton-Codura. •
Project Outcome: Once fully implemented,over 75% of all diversion volume from the Sacramento River will be screened.
•� r1F.f. M,JC .:
M'4a
�6
� r E y �Ar�Tfi F fY�,
r'' FF
3A�i^�*j
:�. '' 1'� • // .Rtiy. p•'yi'X 7. �.^1( $' 1x• r 1 H�. Nh�; r4
.71
'`5`C
4 r
:
Lake Shasta
•
•
RED INO Rivers on which case study projects •
BATTLE CREEK ore occuring. r
a
CALIFORNIA'S •
SACRAMENTO VALLEY
r
SACRAMENTO
RIVER
•
+�Y^ Laka Oroville
kyf�'v •
BUTTE •
CREEK •
N
COLUSA Y
,t \
O VLRONA
13
The Bay/Delta Accord: Promises Made
In December 1994. major water exporters signed the Bay/Delta Accord. and agreed to give up
1.1 million acre-feet of dry-year water supplies in exchange for future supply certainty.
Quotes:
President Clinton:
4
,.-rhe (Bay/Delta Accord) Is an Innovative plan
that prdtects both wafer quallty;and voter
supplies... and that provides'the certainty
necessary for water users'
• q
• President Bill Clinton, Dec. 15. 1994 ' " '.'6 P
• Secretary Babbitt:
"A deal Is a deal, and If It turns out there's a
• need for additional water. It will come at the
expense of the federal government..'
SF Chronicle, Dec. 17. 1994
•
The Accord promised fisheries recovery and water supply and water
quality improvements.
14
The Bay-Delta Accord: Promises Broken
Since the Accord. fisheries have improved while water supply losses have continued to mount - despite a
string of five wet years.
• Over the past decade,Californians
have laced a zero-sum game.
• Water gains for fish have directly
translated into water losses for
California's economy.
• Especially hard-hit will be 22 million Trend in Combined CVP/SWP Drought Period Delivery Capability •
Californians and millions of acres of 99AA South of the Della
larmland that rely on water deliveries +atp p } --� Ilgak615vppL__-_-L___—_--_-_-.
[rum the Delta. °0°° ',4: of ESA,101
F.rly lmpbm.n,.Ib To 0.1. I Folur. 'k A
• Cumulative water losses to these 6A00 _ .1CVPIA,1999
hot Mco l'Ilon w
Californians now total l.4million 1A«..d,,99s I Rm.,nlalmp.m..l.n.11
acre-feel during dry years,almost moo I .1 A00AM.N R...NO.. y
Im Iem.nttl Ma ➢InlryR rFlora 111TTT'RRb���RRR
one-third of previously available p 999 proem 6cwaam
01 Funlur CVPIA Acllan.,1996
M. I u5{W6 TUA Rapulaay
dry-year supplies. A. ,,.n°:
I
• Additional proposed federal actions
threaten to nearly double these if a°° I h ^
I.
supply losses. I ;,
Aao. Supply Available
to CVP/SWP
ISO
loon I FI
I •y li�
Soo i
i A!'
0
1911 1916 Igoe I990 1991 1996 1996 1998 "M 0002 ap.
I5
What Does It Mean for the Next Drought?
Central Valley Project South-Of-Delta Customers
CVP Ag Water Service Contractors CVP Urban Customers
2500 150 .. .,w.,.�
1500 100
75
1000 E
50
• 500 L:1 �__ 25 1 L 9
0 D
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Av0 1987 1980 1969 1990 1991 1992 Avg
Agricultural customers receive LM deliveries for three Urban customers receive less than 35% of supplies lot
r
consecutive years. two consecutive years.
•
CVP Refuge Detiveries CVP Exchange Contractors
300 1000
250 p
I{{• _ 800 I[1
200 i,
y = 600
• 150 a
• 100 0 400
200
1987 1968 1989 1990 1991 1992 Avg 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Ave
Refuge deliveries increased five-fold due to implementation Deliveries to exchange contractors are relatively unaftecmd
of CVPIA and Interior administrative decisions. due to senior water rights.
16
What Does It Mean for the Next Drought?
State Water Project South-Of-Delta Customers
SWP Deliveries to Santa Clara Valley Water District SWP Deliveries to Kern County Water Agency
100 - _ _ _ _- _ _ Sw.m . .. _ _ 1200
aue,n..m.
80 IDg041
egg •,
60 ;
40 1 400 �. 1
F � I
20 200 0 0
1987 1900 1909 1990 1991 1992 Avg 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Avg
Silicon Valley economy faces a double hit:SWP cuts of Nation's fourlh-largest agricultural producing county
nearly 55% on lop of reduced CVP supplies. loses an additional 1.5 MAF of supply over the course
of the drought, A
•
SWP Deliveries to Metropolitan Water District
® Actual Deliveries During 1500
the 1987.1992 Drought •
1200
�77 Current Delivery Capability ;
Flea in a repeat of the 1987-1992 Drought 900 -
(not taking into account potential •
implementation of additional regulations) 600
,1
Actual impacts would be ago .4
more severe under pending D
federal actions. 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Avg
Southern Calilornta economy laces an addilional
halt-million acre-feel shortfall in some drought yomrs.
'Aclnal do par dnminds Invn hnnn sn6alanlydiY indnrnil dnn In nnumi,ai n
and mrycling invrtslmnnls Dimml wnl pminln,......dins al me Ihner iniLi,ilcil will 1 f
he mgniind In mpinnixh xlmagn.
II �Y
Water Supplies At Risk Even In Normal and Wet Years
The impacts of current and
¢ N , tttregulations
reduced available supplies,
._
t t • normal
conditions,by inoto than
one 11mil. Detiyery Capability Under NormaL'Hydrologic Conditions
444 II',
.�R ' I Yet ' i
.�111q-
{a
�
i I
x a'l a:i i'tt w my�. 43 9
day��yc I
�Y f. ' I x �;1 twWr asp ty j,�i 9
Y Oiau,ft, I
o dw !'Y rt
I',
AfRP.1nd new fimilv flows
18
I�
! r
FRIOAV
The Sacramento Bee
Protection of fish puts farm, Bay Area water at risk
It,N.."Vnerl h.ve mend w.ter Prny.rt np.mbrs to n ^rapine Plnnt. pinnis nM n,n In u.Pnrifr(. vn will den mean tarn III— lino ndndr
Rn Pwn FXw PnmP I•nt thin hill n'h.,they.—wily IFnn P.",,l in 1h.lot 1.In lR hnrl lMSnn.l,mTnn nM SnulM1rrn CA. wn li�n fn llv,nrnt In—.
nulA 6mm lFr 9. nni-I.Sou Jnngnin Tic—wr-Ily n wnlrr n,PPIY tn.in;nn:d fmin-Mli nil ln•I nil wank hint fnr ]hd it Urlln PnmfinP.•Inn.n l innrn
F.Rmd In pmlM . smdl tFrrnlenM IMlln,l'nlifmnie'n Primvpmmrrtr M win S.-Mntnnlq.wh."ty-ritn M miV mvnllntnmmglh,w.R within An„S.-A. •in VAII,fmm•
f.h M1nn wddenly In— in- - vl` hcr,to k.,thnnlenM lwlln smell frmm I:n. ..br mown n.p-,.I manner N 9h h I.11 lwn 6mnlim.'.10 lam —Ild ante,n.vh r.yn.ah..h•
Ihnl mill down, . . mpplln In Sao Twin,killel in In int pl.nh. the Sate wit', nn I,tln nf et•m O.p,IMA •ywr.li•m• fir lM Rtr n I— rnhnItmn rvn.M d...... I
.InnrPiin V.11, Ivan. . ml Thr.i4ulwn M1a.rrihrnl lninllhnrc IMm.ml rr wA."i,'ndl,n^I•I^P' venter Prlj 11 Fan tM Mt,"I:nl nn h ICn•Y,n thin Son l'Inn'i%%,I,,. pp
neck nM In III.Sit—V.1h,I.trr thin day wInn ter hWiviIt .rvfnN W rnx in,Ili.relative hlrkle Rvwin¢nunlF ryiinl nl impwi,Mlh re,1a1 nnA N ntr m In Fdimn Vnlln, m.v fora mmpk
q 1M•n n l.nd,L.te w.W nPnidn IM1r M•mpin,rlr:rtm which III—nI from the IM w n prnlrtl nA nl r lln, nl(ddn waln pmlrcl tnnlmm�. n pr tihly L..nnli4dncf w,lr 61'ty A
.aid71n.MnT n 4'Whwi In.ink.III,,III,,th.n ununl ..iA. thhhrw.>." t_
rue the ryni mnnlM1,f d.r.I MaM(i.4 InIw nmmll ire lin/Mn[mhnmi.wq ,Morn.,m nwwh..lm pit lvmpin, nrinm:n[Smnhern l'.Gfmui. —I. 1'hrwnnTf%Mph
For sixty days in 1999,The lillh year San Luis Storage With and Without
of a record wel period.operations to ESA Fish Protection Measures
protect the Della Smell put
California's urban and agricultural 25M June 1999 Projection
economy at risk.
• More than one-hall million acre-feel 20M '.
of San Luis Reservoir storage was
used to protect Della Smell.
1500
• Depleting San Luis Reservoir storage — Projected Opelalions
to dangerously low levels seriously a a Without ESA
1000 fish Protection Measures
jeopardiles water quality and water —
supply for The Silicon Valley. 15
500
0 J al
MAR APR MAY IUR JUL AUG SEP ° Y
19
Delta Water: For Urban Water Customers, It's An Issue Of Quality
the Della as a source of water ranks near the bottom in terms of
water quality nationwide,
• Bromide and T1IlMs both raise public health concerns
because of possible links to cancer. Both are found in lair
higher concentrations in Delta water supplies than in other
sources across The nation.
• • Ifigh concentrations of IDS impede efforts to recycle and
reuse water and degrade groundwater basins.
•
• Comparison of Delta Water Quality to National Average
• (Medians)
d
total Bromide Total
Trlhalomelhanes Ipphl Dissolved Solids
(TTIIMs)(pphl 00s1(ppm)
200 276
•
t
A
r 164
•
r,
72
4
33 5
Delta National Della Nallonal Della National
Water Average Water Average Water Average
20
Fishery Protection Actions Conflict With Drinking Water
Quality Protection
• Iligh levels of TIIM precursors and salinity are found in
untreated Della water.
• Actions required to protect lisheries are often at odds with
public health goals related to water quality.
• Failure to improve Della water quality relative to existing lev- •
els could increase demands on the Bay-Della system by up to
400.000 acre-feel annually.
•
e
A
1999 South Delta Water Quality • Regulatory agencies propose to
shift exports from spring to
'S0 Jail to protect fish. •
400 — • For example.in 1999 shilling R
350 exports from spring to fall
seoirmIj
increases IDS by 70%. q
E 30e �
H 35e
200 Liarldi Lamle=lit wplL
n IN
Spring to 6pertFalls ban
F wa S Spri
results in a degradation
5C, In export water quality
0
April May June July August September October
21
Californians expect their leaders to provide sufficient supplies of
good quality water.
Governor Gray Davis. in October
1999, signed a $1.97 bitlion water
r bond bill for the March 2000
ballol.
A1<
2
•
Recent polls document that the public supports • Proposition 204: $995 million for ecosysiern and water
investments that provide: quality approved by voters in 1996.
• Sale, reliable drinking water. • Federal funding authorization: $430 million [or
• ecosystem and other CALFED common programs.
• • Environmental protection.
• $20 million in general load FY 2000 2001 earmarked to
• Reliable water supplies to sustain the Calilornia economy.
study storage.
A We have already laid the foundation for such . Billions invested in conservation,reclamation,and soulb of-
Investments: Della storage.
• Proposition 13: $1.91 billion water bond for March 2000
ballot.
22
ACTIONS NEEDED TO AVERT THE LOOMING CRISIS
Immediate Investments In water system capacity:
• Shift Della management from regulatory mandates to flexible
operations for multiple benefits.
Complete South Della facilities.
• Increase Delta pumping capacity.
• Install fish barrier. •
• Install agricultural flow-control barriers.
• Protect water quality in the South Della. •
• Implement groundwater/storage programs south of the Della.
• Implement programs to improve water quality in and from
the Della.
Develop a balanced,workable Environmental Water Account •
(EWA).
Plan and build appropriate surface storage projects. r
r
r•
- e
For more information,contact:
Association of California Water Agencies
(916) 441-4545
23
O
�y
T
o n.
O
9 ER •
N
Ul D,
• 2 A
apC 3 z
O Z
C �
_ O
r
W 2000- A Technical Sym osium
Itratiolet (LTV) disinfection is an alternative UV disinfection,these guidelines are onh'an
VGmethod for meeting the California Wastewater interim measure.
Raclamadon Criteria in regions+%here an oxidized,
coagulated,filtered,disinfected effluent is required. pilot n`"%prekiucn tieing rapidle invaiuced, and
phut pmgranhs pointing toward successfid tends,
Guidelines have been developed for this process, based on
this s}inpersium hill help de t%ater and hvacahvater
demonstrated eyuis•alrncy of-LTV dishhfectiun to chlorine
treatment industn-address its "knowledge gaps"
disinfection as presently nuked in ss'utewaer reclamation mid prepare for the future. This need to mise the
treannent plants.
California guidelines,coupled hsith a delve to remg-
However, In light of evoking technology,and the nlze and overcome regulator'Impediments,is the
experience treatment plane operators have gained midi unpette behind UV 1O00: A Trrintirai Swuponnw.
U
The NNNTl Corporate Associates:
Black & Vcmch - tinned%/Jenks Consultants
THE\3flHNA1 h%dTIR kBN10.H IFTn'l'rk
105W Fllu Avrn�
Rmic Enginrerinc Malcohn Pirnir, Inc.
M.Rort 20865 a Camp. Presser& Mcluc. Inc. Montgomen Watu+n Americas, Inc.
Foumun vdlm,Cilitomia 92728-0865
Carollu Engineer :. I+arvyhs Engineering Science, Inc.
- CH?\I Hill - Robert Rcin,William Front
Dominguez Scrrices Corp. & Associates
Ionics. Inc. - The Irvine Companc
January 27-28, 2000
Costa Mesa, California
Sponsored by:
The National Water
Research institute
rF "�`.' S,f:. •' 'I ✓r+l)t lrtll and
Theociaclatest
Corporate Asses
In zvllaboranon with
.w.•-.•� ..•.--.. __.... _
.The California Department-:
`""-' of Health Services
LTV 2000-4 A Technical Symposium
Costa Mesa, California January 27-2S. 2000
Conference Highlights
ri or'—he naodaclTl-'Technology Symposium, SYMPOSIUM SCHEDULE
'S: 4 (i sponsored be the National Water Research Institute
{ +a� Day 1:Morning...
and the N'WRI Corporate Associates,in collaboration
with the California Department of Health Services, rill ♦Welcome.
focus on mane of the most pressing issues facing those + LTV Technology: The Setting
in the water and wastewater industry•who tram to Brief historc of the Technology's evolution:
`• " utilize this technology: li'brrr bm•r we Grrn and n•bnr mr u•rgoing?
• In light of the key accomplishments in the past i
x> ,, g P � P �� Fey technical issues within the tenter utility
years, what is the "state-of-the-art" for CT setting.
` a disinfection?
Day 1:Afternoon...
• What technical and regulatory challenges face the
application of the technology face today, and in • Wiat regulatory impediments need to be overcome
''Ir� the future? to gain broader acceptance of UV technology?
j� • To attain significant "break throughs" in the next Day 2: Morning...
five pears,what knowledge gaps need to be filled, 4. Knowledge Gaps: What's missing to enhance
and how, do we best approach these problems?
water and wastewater applications?
What current results from demonstration and
Building the roadmap to the next level.
j pilot scale projects point to new directions in the • Current Activity and Research reports.
technology?
or% To effectively revise current California UV Day 2.Aftrnoon...
Guidelines, what key requirements will need to • Status of New Product Developments.
t he met? + Revisiting the California W Guidelines
REGISTRATION: Return the completed To.r rmfrrtnu bads,will br prrpand from rin informorion promdcd orbs.
registration form to January 5,2000,to the Pkux poor rkarly aM ampkn.11 items.
National Water R"Mh Institute,P.O.Boa
20865,Fountain Valley,CA 92728-0865.
Regua atinn fees.be paid by check or purchue ` t..
onler,or an invoice can be mailed. Please make
dsccks payable to: NWIU W 2000 Svmpodum. c.mamio,w�+a�
HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS:The Md" �nixu.Zr wa.
UV 2000 Technical S)mpmmm"ill be held at
The Double Tore,Hotel,3050 Bristol Street,
Costa Mesa,Calilbmia 92626.Rrservatiom can Plan Indian your cl is of.."me.
be made by eaBing the horel at(714)540 7000 ❑ Conference Regbtndon:S225.00,indudes 2lumha and a dbmcr.
or(800)222-TREE.Rates:Single Occupancy.
S 125.00;Double Occupancy:3125.00! Room Pkan indi."you dmicr of p.r mr.
re (ions will be takm on a first come,feat ❑ Check ar purchase order endosed made pa)able ro: NVIRI W2000 Sympedam
,erst base.When making resavmotn,be sure m ❑ Plea.send invoice.
reference UV 2000.ATrrbniral Symposium/ Pkea rtn m abk form side paymmr m:
Nation.!Waam Retcardi Innirun.
Natio:ul Water Research Indmm • P.O.Boa 20865 • Fountain Villry,G 92729-0865
'Abut r.ra.n abfm aapp4abk tan."oaf (714)378-3278 . F.:(714)3783375
rv.poaq ram,oo mrh.t N
Groups want more water in Colorado River rage r or a
Need a cactus? shop
r NEWS SPORTS ENTIRTAINIAM BUSINESS TRAVEL CIASSINEOS. SHOPPING YULOWPAW
Groups want more water in Colorado
River
Associated Press
Nov. 12. 1999
WASHINGTON-By the time the Colorado River reaches the
Mexican border, the water has been dammed and diverted so
many times that the river is often little more than a trickle.
A coalition of environmentalist groups on both sides of the
border is developing a publicity and lobbying campaign to
change that. Their argument: Without a dedicated flow of
�,. water, the delta where the river meets the Gulf of California
,�. will wither and die.
, r
"What we're talking about is conservation of water where the
benefit is felt not by developers in San Diego, but by wildlife
and local communities at the river's end in the delta," said Dave
Hogan of the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the
coalition's leaders.
The idea gets a frosty reception from water officials in the
thirsty Southwest, where Colorado River water feeds the needs
of growing cities and farm fields in the deserts of Arizona,
California and Nevada.
"Some of these historical systems and habitats are going to
have to go by the wayside, or we're going to have a perpetual
zoo where man is artificially maintaining these species," said
Arizona state Sen. Herb Guenther, president of the Colorado
River Water Users Association. "Frankly, I don't think we can
afford to do that."
The coalition plans to send a letter today to officials in the
United States and Mexico, asking them to renegotiate part of a
1944 treaty spelling out each country's share of Colorado River
water. The groups are backing up the letter with newspaper
advertisements urging supporters to write to officials in both
countries.
http://www.azcentral.conVnews/1122water.shtml 11/23/1999
Groups want more water in Colorado River rage z of s
"We have to ... finish with the old selfish ways of water use
between the United States and Mexico," said Ernesto Reynoso
of the Centro Regional Estudios Ambientales y
Socioeconomicos, a Mexican group in the coalition.
The U.S. official who manages the lower reaches of the river
said he doubted there was enough water for the
environmentalists' proposal.
"I'm not sure that allocating more water to Mexico is the right
answer," said Bob Johnson of the Bureau of Reclamation. "I
would hope there are other win-win approaches to meeting
environmental needs other than allocating water supplies."
The river delta has shrunk from 3,000 square miles to 150,000
acres in the decades since dams and canals began diverting the
Colorado River's water, yet still is an important stopping place
for migrating birds, as well as a haven for endangered species
of fish, birds, plants and porpoises, Hogan said.
Sending more water to the delta will help keep those species
alive, as well as helping the gulfs shrimp and other marine life,
Hogan said.
The letter urges guaranteed flows in the river into Mexico of
nearly 230,000 acre-feet a year. That's more than two-thirds of
the 300,000 acre-feet allocated to Nevada each year. An acre-
foot is about 326,000 gallons, or about as much water as eight
people use in a year.
The 1944 treaty allocates 7.5 million acre-feet each year to
Arizona,California and Nevada and 1.5 million acre-feet to
Mexico. California's allotment is 4.4 million acre-feet, while
Arizona's is 2.8 million acre-feet.
"The goal is a noble one-to make sure there's a riparian
(stream-side)habitat that's preserved," said Arizona
Department of Water Resources spokesman Jack Lavelle. "But
when you've got an area that's growing rapidly and a river that's
already allocated at its normal capacity, I just don't know where
the water will come from."
Hogan said water users in the "water-hog" states of California,
Arizona and Nevada could install conservation measures that
would save enough water to send to Mexico.
"Joe Public who has a small lawn and wants to wash the car on
weekends isn't the problem,"Hogan said. "Massive, continued
http://www.azcentral.com/news/I 122water.shtml 11/23/1999
- Groups want more water in Colorado River Page 3 of 3
urban sprawl demanding more and more water is one of the
roots of the problem. Massively inefficient agribusiness use of
water is another root of the problem."
Guenther countered that inefficient use of water by farmers
actually helps the environment by providing enough water for
vegetation to grow on the banks of dry rivers and irrigation
canals. Guenther works for the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation
District, which provides Colorado River water to vegetable
farms in southwestern Arizona.
"This sounds really strange, but sloppy is good for the
environment," Guenther said. "With the seepage from canals
and unlined ditches and the extra flow from sewage plants,
you're creating riparian and wetland habitats."
BACK TO TOP
COALMIIMTY I At%THE Mae
HUSMS CAMICOMPIrnNG
CAPS BE&Ilam I I=I A¢ET YOUR AIATCH
EM RTAWAffM(SPORTS JTKAVFl I rORM"I HOW
Copyright 1999,Arizona Central
Search The Republic's Archives I Subs nbe to The RMu_blic
Contact us
http://www.azcentral.com/news/I 122watecshtml 11/23/1999
THE ECONOMIST
OCTOBER 30TH 1999
EUROPE
Boue to you too
r i
FRENCH is the language of haute c ti. mal feed would be illegal—unarguably so.
sirm,and with good reason.Tablier de The cu banned the use of"sewage sludge"
sapeur on the menu tempts the palate in in tlgr. But some countries contend that
ways that a"slab of nipe"never will.But bouecan be treated in ways that transform 1
French has been doing equally good set- it into something altogether nobler than �•
vicedown in thebassecuisineas well.Ani- meresludge
mals in France, Germany. Belgium and The argument rums on the treatment
Holland have been reared for years using of waste water.When it swills out ofaban
something the French all boues 116puns- mirs and rendering-plants it carries some for at(cast ao minutes so that any bacteria
tion. Now the British are clutching their animal excrement,along with all the other aredestroyed.Thuscleansed,thestuffisno
stomachs to discover that this little deli- debris for which even industrial mat pro- longer"sewage sludge"' all,butachap
acy translates, more or less,as "sewage testing finds no use.it may carry human and alorific additive for use in pig-and
sludge",flushed out of abanoirs and ren- excrement ifa single water system serves a chicken-feed.
dering-plants and sometimes even septic whole plant. Typically, it goes through The European Commission is among
tanks.In one of the European Union's an- three stages of treatment:a filtering out of those feeling queasy as it pushes its eggs
gnest internal trade disputes,many British solids from liquids:a chemical separation and bacon around the plate,It hassent out
farmers and others are demanding a ban of fats and grease:and a biological treat- a questionnaire asking eu governments to
on"sewage-fed"French mat for at last as ment of this residue making it innocuous explain,with diagrams,wanly what they
long as France maintains its ban on British enough to throw away.This last product is do with their waste water. when those
beef(seepage 66). something which all parties agree to be come back at the end of this week the com-
The precision of translation here is a "sewagesludge". mission will probablydecide robroaden its
manerofcritial dispum lfbouesd'epum- But pm-sludge countries think the fats sludge han.it will take in things which may
tion were always mere"sewage sludge"as and greases yielded up by the second stage not be illegal at the moment on a French
the British (and the Eumpan Commis- ofthedcansing processcanbeput tobener view but which might nonetheless bede-
sion)understandigthenputtingit inmani- use They an be pressurecaoked at t}jc finedas,well,disgusting.
Lawsuit challenges validity of Kern's new sludge ordinance j•kL D �-_' ' '• rage t u1 J
:1!-r � }kthr,IslickL�cmt
news VrAVJwT dbC4ifonnzn -nwno
Lawsuit challenges validity of
Kern's new sludge ordinance
Filed: 11109199
By CHRISTINE BEDELL
Califomian staff writer
e-mail:cbedell(albakersheld.com
M expected lawsuit challenging the fairness and constitutionality of Kern
County's new sludge laws was filed by six public and private agencies this
week.
The suit, filed in Kern County Superior Court Monday, seeks an
injunction against the ordinance's enforcement, saying it was based on
shallow science and would harm the environment.
The plaintiffs also want the county to set aside4he ordinance for now and
better study the safety and efficacy of applying sludge, or biosolids, on
local farmland.
If it does, the county will change its mind about sludge, said Dan Hyde,
one of the plaintiff attorneys.
"There's no question biosolids application is a safe and environmentally
sound process," Hyde said.
The lawsuit was anticipated and contained no surprises, said Kern County
Counsel Bernard Bairmann.
The county thoroughly reviewed the conflicting scientific studies of
biosolids and met all legal requirements for studying the environmental
impacts of the ordinance before the Board of Supervisors OK'd it, he
said.
The county will "aggressively defend" the ordinance,Barman said.
"We think we have the right to protect our water, our soil, the health of
our residents and Kern County agriculture," he said.
http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--I269934936.asp 11/10/99
Lawsuit challenges validity of Kern's new sludge ordinance Page 2 of 3
The ordinance, approved unanimously on Oct. 5, phases out the land
application of all but "exceptional quality" biosolids, a mix of human and
industrial waste used as fertilizer, over three years.
Kern County accepts one-third of the sludge generated in California. In
recent years, it has accepted 1 million tons of Class B biosolids annually.
Scientists are split on its safety.
Those suing Kern are: the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los
Angeles County; Orange County Sanitation District; city of Los Angeles;
California Association of Sanitation Agencies; Southern California
Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works; and Responsible Biosolids
Management Inc.
Their lawyers contend Kern should have completed an environmental
impact report as the California Environmental Quality Act requires for
projects with a potentially significant adverse environmental effect.
The ban would result in, they say, a loss of farmland enriched by
biosolids, the increased use of pesticides and the use of alternative sludge
disposal options that are more harmful.
The county exceeded its authority, disrupted interstate commerce and
otherwise endangered the welfare of Southern California communities
that apply their sludge in Kern County, the lawsuit said.
It also said the ordinance's $3.37- per-ton impact fee to mitigate Kern's
infrastructure damage from the transportation of sludge was a tax that
should have been submitted to voters.
"To suggest the ban of biosolids in Kern County wouldn't result in
significant impacts is silly," said Bakersfield attorney Mark Jones,who
represents Responsible Biosolids Management.
In an FIR, Kern County would have had to identify alternatives to the
Southern California generators bringing biosolids here,Barman said.
That's not only impossible but inappropriate, he said: "What they do with
the stuff is not our problem."
He also called "interesting" how the lawsuit dwelled on how difficult and
environmentally unfriendly it would be for generators to find alternative
sludge-disposal options. "Of the 26 pages of the petition, (attorneys
spend)nine or ten pages pointing out how bad biosolids are,"Barman
said.
Supervisor Jon McQuiston said he's comfortable with the level of
http://v w .bakersfield.com/top/i--I269934936.asp 11/10/99
Lawsuit challenges validity of Kern's new sludge ordinance Page 3 of 3
scientific study Kem County conducted before approving the phase-out.
He criticized the plaintiffs for suing when they didn't conduct an
environmental impact report before trucking biosolids up north.
"It seems somewhat odd they're concerned about our CEQA processes
when there's no suggestion they did any level of study before bringing it
to Kern County,"McQuiston said.
Jones said the attorneys have not thoroughly discussed or decided
whether to attempt to move the case out of Kern County and before
judges not beholden to voters here.
He believes local judges can be thoughtful and impartial, he said.
Neither has the group formally asked the court to set aside Kern County's
ordinance while the legal case moves forward, Hyde said.
Getting the court to weigh in on the key part of the case—whether Kern
County met all CEQA requirements—should come"expeditiously,"
Hyde said.
® O
e.� ma m ep root
GM�amo 1999,The B"Mafietl GlibmYn Email tlw r
Fec"cvtetl Press WovroM Netiw�Princv PM'w SkaemeN
http://www.bakersfield.com/topfi-1269934936.asp 11/10/99
YW W UV, . JYUb'U 661G wljr,G.OIL luic. Page I of 2
41 Buyers Cruide
local news Or RibrrsUdb Ciblanuan - no.,.
Bid to move sludge case hinges on
rules
Filed: 12107199
By FRED LUDWIC
Californian staff writer
e-mail: Budwig(obakersfield.com
Attorneys on both sides of a lawsuit over Kem County sludge rules held
a rural-vs:urban debate Tuesday in the bid to move the case to another
county.
A Kern County judge started the hearing by saying he was leaning
toward sending the case to Tulare County,drawing objections from
attorneys with the agencies who brought the suit. Those biosolids
generators and appliers, which include Los Angeles city, suggested
sending it to San Francisco.
That didn't sit well with Kern's attorneys.
Judge Gary Friedman took the points under consideration and said he
expects to make a ruling within the next week.
The debate was prompted by the plaintiffs claims that public comments
and publicity over the issue will keep them from getting a fair trial in
Kern.They are challenging the county ordinance phasing out all but
"exceptional quality"biosolids over the next three years.
The human and industrial wastes are often sold to farmers to use as
fertilizer on non-food crops.
Tulare would not be a fair choice to the plaintiffs because it has a sludge
regulation of its own, said Thomas Nixon, attorney for the Orange
County Sanitation District.
Nixon said San Francisco has the advantage of good airport access. But
Mike Hogan, the attorney hired to represent Kem,said officials don't
want the case heard in a heavily urban area.
"It's a question of whose ox is being gored," Hogan said.
A venue change generally is mandatory in disputes between public
agencies. But Kern officials argued Tuesday against any move, saying
http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1267523441.asP 12/8/1999
u... ...u....�e,uugu..mc nuigcn uu lumb Page 2 of 2
one is not permitted when entities assert a statewide interest in the case,
as the plaintiffs are doing.
Kent officials have also said they would prefer to bring in ajudge to the
case from another county, rather than moving the proceedings, to save
costs.
The plaintiffs want Kem's Oct. 5 ordinance rescinded and another
environmental review conducted.
A judge, not ajury, would decide whether the environmental study was
sufficient.
® ® O
back back to top home
CopyriphM 1M.The Bakemrreld Caldomian I Email the Webma�ter
Associated Press Polly Statem_enl
http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1267523441.asp 12/8/1999
tresnobee.com I King of Kings f age 1 of J
Cleaning up
California's dairy Industry casts a wary eye as federal watchdogs move in to monitor
manure management.
By Last! A. Maxwell
The Fresno Bee
Before local watchdogs fired off lawsuits, before the state attorney general sent warnings, the federal
EPA was already taking charge. Citing success in cleaning up factories and sewage, the government's
environmental police agency is now targeting its next mess: manure.
As California's dairies churn out billions of dollars in milk products, the Environmental Protection Agency
and the Department of Agriculture are zeroing in on pollution from existing 'factory-style" animal
operations in a renewed effort to clean up the nation's water supplies.
Their mandate: more environmental accountability from operators ranging from dairymen to hog farmers.
Dairy farmers with 700 or more milk cows must prove to regulators that manure is not sullying surface
and groundwater. Because of their size, more than half of California's 2,246 dairies will be required to
submit detailed plans on how they manage waste, and reveal everything from the number of cows they
milk to how many gallons of wastewater is used to irrigate crops on their farms.
For decades, dairies kept a low profile among environmental regulators, who spent their efforts clamping
down on pollution from other sources. But spills from a number of animal farms in the last five years are
now prompting attention.
The dramatic change in the dairy industry -from mom-and-pop farms to huge operations such as the
Chamberlain Ranch plan proposed by J.G. Boswell Co. - also triggered concerns.
"We've dealt with pollution from factories and sewage," says Dan Meer, a Clean Water Act enforcer with
the EPA. "Now, we've got to manage what's coming out of the back end of animals."
In most states, animals' hind-end products have ended up in rivers and streams. But in California,
protecting groundwater - a precious resource in a thirsty state -worries officials.
Cow manure from dairies is rich in nitrates and salt. If mishandled, environmental experts say it can seep
into groundwater and threaten drinking water. The problem stems from leaky dairy storage ponds that
hold millions of gallons of waste and from overusing manure as fertilizer on crops.
'This is a real environmental problem that we need to head off at the pass," says Laura Bose, an EPA
groundwater specialist.
The EPA will be the ultimate enforcer of the rules, Bose says, but it will delegate most of the work to
state officials who will review waste management plans and inspect dairies. Inspections will start in 2005.
Convincing dairy operators to trust the EPA will be difficult. Says Meer: "It's like starting at ground zero.
file:l/C:\TEMP\cleaningup_print.htm 12/1/99
fresnobee.com j King of Kings Page 1 ots
The industry is very secretive and holds information very close to the vest. It's been difficult to get past
their suspicions of our interest."
Some view the EPA's invasion as blatant duplication of what state regulators already do. Says Bob
Feenstra, executive director of the Southern California-based Milk Producers Council: "What we're
seeing is EPA sort of assuming the role of the regional water quality control board, and I'm not real
happy about that."
But Bose counters: "Dairymen need to be more aware of what they are doing environmentally. We need
to make sure that new dairies are built in the right place."
Kings County dairyman George Longfellow agrees that proper location "is just common sense. Of course
you don't build a dairy on the edge of town. A problem dairy gives us all a big black eye."
But in the central San Joaquin Valley, restricting milk cows to the right place may be precisely the
problem: Counties are wildly inconsistent in their rules for new dairies:
n In Fresno County, planners do not require special permits for locating in certain agricultural zones,
relying on state agencies for environmental studies. Planners simply check zoning policy and, if a
proposal is within the rules, dairymen only need building permits to start construction.
n Merced County scrutinizes plans for dairies only when they are proposed near residences.
Environmental studies are prepared and the planning commission makes the final decision. Dairies
planned for sparsely populated areas get "over the counter" permits from the county within a few days.
n Kings and Tulare counties, where some of largest dairy herds are found, have the most stringent rules
in the state. No new dairies, regardless of size or location, are built without approval from planning
commissions. First, planners study the impacts on water, air and health, consulting with agencies such
as the California Department of Fish and Game and mosquito abatement districts. Planners then present
their findings to planning commissioners who approve or deny the project.
Even so, Kings and Tulare counties are working to tighten dairy regulations. Tulare was close to adding
dairy guidelines to its general plan but was stalled when the state attorney general filed two lawsuits
against the county over proposed dairies. The lawsuits, now settled, are forcing officials to broaden
environmental studies of dairies.
Kings County officials say a new approach to dairies is on their agenda.
"I don't think state and federal regulations fit all the dairy operations in Kings County," says county
planning director Bill Zumwalt. "Localized regulations can do it much better."
qqq
In all counties, once a dairy is running, environmental oversight is left mainly to the state's regional water
quality control boards.
To prepare for the EPA, a coalition of state agencies, led by the State Water Resources Control Board in
Sacramento, is working on fostering more environmental stewardship among dairy operators.
file://C:ITEMPIcleaningup_print.htm 12/l/99
fresnobee.com I King of Kings Page 3 of 3
The plan is to "certify" dairies that meet stale and federal regulations. To be certified, dairymen can take
classes from University of California Cooperative Extension experts on how to protect the environment.
Then, dairymen will work with "evaluators" who determine whether the dairy is properly managing its
waste.
The California Dairy Quality Assurance Program does not establish new rules for dairies or introduce
other enforcement measures, says Jack Hodges, who heads the program.
"This is really to help the dairymen out with compliance before inspectors from the regional boards or
EPA show up," he says.
"The federal government has significantly raised the priority of this across the nation. We need to not
only be aware, but we need to take action."
file://C:\TEMP\cleaningup_print.htm 12/1199
Compost plant seeks home in Kern Page I of 3
Fttd�t our MAKERSF E D Sk.
�Imuexidt
local news or EtWtstielO Qtdifarnim .aama
Compost plant seeks home in
Kern
Filed: 12103199
By CHRISTINE BEDELL
Californian staff writer
email:cbede1l0bakersfield.c0m
A composting plant that could be the first of many to come as a result of
new county sludge regulations is proposed for north of Bakersfield.
A Washington state biosolids management company is seeking permits
for a facility to treat waste from several Southern California agencies.
The project would accept Class B biosolids and cook them until they
meets "exceptional quality" sludge standards. Kern County has passed an
ordinance that, in three years,would ban the spreading of anything less
than exceptional-quality sludge—which,through cooking and treating,
is considered safe enough for use in household gardens.
The project is slated for 320 acres one-half mile north of 7lh Standard
Road and on the east side of Magnolia Avenue. An environmental
review of the proposal is just getting under way.
"Assuming the Kern County ordinance goes into effect,it behooves us
generators to go to(other options) for managing the material," said Mike
Moore, manager of environmental compliance and monitoring for the
Orange County Sanitation District.
Public hearings on the conditional-use permit request from The Yakima
Co.Inc. are about five months away, so the county hasn't yet notified
people around the site of it.
One who has heard about it—Marta Haag, whose family owns 240
acres of farmland 31 fJ2 miles east of Magnolia—already disapproves.
She and her husband,Ed,share the usual waste-facility concerns: odors,
flies and truck traffic.
http://www.bakersfield.com/bakti--i267867876.asp 12/6/99
Compost plant seeks home in Kern Page 2 of 3
The proposal has scared off one potential land buyer,Maria Haag said.
"We're absolutely not happy about it," she said of the project.
The environmental review should reveal if fear is warranted.
Biosolids generators need new options for disposing their waste because
of a new county ordinance that bans land application of Class B sludge
beginning in three years.
The site could handle more than 1 million cubic yards of material,
including various kinds of green waste and biosolids, in its first phase.
But not all the material would be on site at one time, Yakima said.
The Yakima Co. is already under contract with Southern California
agencies to dispose of their waste on two major Kern County farms. So
the sludge the plant would treat wouldn't add to Kern's importation
totals.
The agencies whose waste would go to the plant are: County Sanitation '
Districts of Los Angeles County;Orange County Sanitation District;
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works; Camrosa Water
District in Camarillo;Camarillo Sanitation District;plus the cities of
Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley, Santa Paula and Filmore.
Several of them have filed a lawsuit to halt enforcement of Kern's sludge
phase-out until the rules' environmental consequences are better studied.
Until a judge rules on the request,they're operating under the assumption
that the ordinance will stand.
In fact,The Yakima Co. probably would have built the composting
facility even if the ban weren't approved,said President Jim Willett.
It's difficult in the winter to incorporate Class B biosolids into the
ground and within 24 hours of its arrival, as required, he said.
"Remember,two years ago, that wet weather?" Willett asked. "I never
forgot it."
County Planning Director Ted lames said Kern is likely to see more
requests of this kind as the ban nears. "Will we see more composting
facilities in the county?" he asked. "Probably so."
® ® Q
bUk twck to lop nenr
http://www.bakersfield.comfbak/i--1267867876.asp 12/6/99
OCSD Report
Challenged by
SEHBNA
he Orange County Sanitation
District's Enwrunmemal Im-
pact Report (EIR) for its
long-range strategic plan was released in
June.The new strategic plan outlines future
plans at its Huntington Beach sewage plant
which will affect the operations and whu is
built there for years to crime.
SEHBNA challenged the adequacy of
the EIR report in front of the Huntington
Beach City Council,hoping to influence the
city's response.and at OCSD's public hear.
ing.Out main concerns are the current and
future levels of odors and chemical emis-
sions. We believe thin more money can be
found within the OCSD's$1.5 billion bud.
get to eliminate odor and chemical leaks at
the plant.
In light of the recent high ocean bacteria
levels and increased regulations on sewage
release looming, we believe the EIR's sce.
nano may be unrealistic because increased
regulations man increased treatment facili.
ties will be needed and increased odors are
likely.SEHBNA wants our beach clean but
we also want OCSD to tun facilities without
leaking chemicals and odors into our
airSechrmlogically it can do this, but it
needs to budget the money.
As required by law.OCSD responded to
our comments in written form but offered
little substantive information. Additionally.
OCSD refused to extend the comment pe.
nod past 45 days, as we requested. stating that "few requests to do so were received.'
In faa,the Air Quality Management District
did rat respond to the environmental report
becauu it did not have enough dme to
review it.
Your comments are needed. Every time
you register a complaint, it is a vote for
change. Residents who witness any sewage
or chemical odors in your neighborhood are,
urged to call the OCSD's direct line. 71C
593-7625.
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section I Page # I Date Subject
At first, the utility didn't worry much "Il'snot like we havea real conflict with
that the Vatican wasn't paying for the ser• Acea." insists the Rev. P. Ciro Benedet-
The Sewage Trouble vice.Making money wasn't among Aces's Jim,deputy director of the Holy See press
At the Holy See priorities."Since the ancient Romans,wa- office. "But this has to be resolved on a
ter was en here as a gift of God,some, state-to•state level. The Vatican simply
y se thing not to be really charged tor;' says doesn't open talks with individual firms."
Is Soaks Investors Maurszio Del.Re, who ran Acea's water "Thank God, it's the Italian foreign
ng works for nearly two decades,ending last ministry and not us directly who have to
. . . year. negotiate with the Vatican."says Mr.Cuc-
Under a Treat the Vatican Tag of Profit cia, Aces's CEO. Not that there's much
R linter the stock market.In early IBM. commotion mere,either.Ministry officials
Gets Free Water: Getting Acea which alsopmvides electricity,lured point to the Italian Republic's Embassy to
new profltrminded management to roll out the Holy See,located in a rustic mansion
Rid of Waste Costs Money on the opposite side of Rome from the Vat-
a1999 initial public offermg.The Vatcan'S ican,asthepoutofronmmforthesesensi-
sewerage bill, totted up r over me years, five talks "But,"an Italian diplomat says,
stood sewage ro.7emjut sprang "For me, min not.BY of THE vTaovnacw whenw had to
repavesprang ran of the blue somelike we have Working groups or
w.ff TICA relTY Here's a dirty secret when we
Acea'srehief financial
thcial officer,
somethingthRo meeting muniihality—municipality—which
Vhe Holy CITY—Here's i dirty secret recalled Acea's chief financial officer, At the Rome municipality—which will
fl the Holy See: Every time someone Isidore Ljoin a,who left to company this have to pay most n me Vatican's bill if
iceCher toilet go downth d aAcea SpA week to join a fledgling telerommunica• the controversy tine[ resolved—officialst
ice melt money go down me drain. boas busmen. are even more reticent. "I'm in constant
That's because this sovereign state, The City of Rome,which mill owns 51% contact with a lot of people at the Van-
.vhich sits on a tiny hilltop in downtown of Acea,role to the rescue.The municipal• can—and we have spoken about every-
tume, dmsn't want to pay its sewerage ityguaranteedallof the Vatican's pmlila thing but Aces's problem;' says Paolo
dlls totheltalian utility.At stake:Twenty- debts,which means that, if the Holy See GenWoni, commissioner for intema-
hme million eums(623.2 million)and ris- doesn't pay up, Roman taxpayers will tional relations and the jubilee. "This is
ng,Acea says. "And it's not lace we ran carry the burden. But the Vatican's new not something ever discussed by the city
of them OH," laments Chief Executive sewerage bills, 23 million euros at last council,either."
•aolo Curtis. "This is an extremely deli- count,are Acea's liability alone.And that There's also a question of historical jus-
ate issue. We're talking aboutmterm- has me Vatican in hot water with AM20S face.The papal state ran Rome and much
ional relations." investors. of central Italy for centuries, until
While diplomacy is involved,it's also a "I certainly hope they pay up,' says Giuseppe Garibaldi's troops stormed the
rassly secular dispute.invoking mterna- Stefano Fablani,who manages 500.000 an, city and annexed it to the young Italian
Tonal law, the Holy See insists that Italy Planar Turn to FLgerAg.Column f Kingdom of the House of Savoy in 1870.
ay these bills. Meanwhile, Acea keeps __ _ Over the centuries, Mr. Del Re says, the
ddingto the total. Continued From Firm Page popes who ruled Rome actually birth a big
I Duce's Legacy ros in Acea shares as part of his equity port part of Aces's current water facilities.The
For the sewage quagmire, blame the folio at Zenit Fond!SGR In Milan."Having last concession issued by the papal mate to
029lateran Treaty,signed by Italy's fan- age
of this kind Isn't good for the im- Supply water services in Rome, to com-
ist Lateran Benito Mussolini,and Cards- age of both Acea and the Vatican." pany called Acquit Pia Antics Marcia SpA,
at Pietro Gasparri,secretary of state fin The dispute is particularly embarrass- expired in 1965.And only in 1999 did Acqua
ape Pius M. The treaty, which esmtr ing becauseome ari
d the Vatican are Marcia, now a publicly traded real-estate
shed the Vatican as a separate country, Preparing for the influx of 29 million company. settle its legal dispute with
overns relations between Acea and the tourists and pilgrims during next year's Rome,which bas transferred the conces-
ipalenclave's 500bdtl citizens. lion
bash.Italy is spending 1.5 bil- Sion to Acea.
lion euros on the city's face lift and on me
Roman sewage was dumped directly While it's crystal clear that the Holy See
,to the Tiber.No one imagined that that jubilee celebrations,whiU will be cooMi- doesn't have to pay for fresh water,nobody
:fight cost money,m noted with me Vatican.Article 6 of the fat- knows exactly who d a now that 49%of
The Holy See, in a statement saran[
an Treaty specified that the Italian snits Acea stock it traded on the Italian Ex-
tids year, described Aces's demands W
vit supply the Vatican,which lacks its change a t, the
vn water resoumas, tree clean water— Pay up as a "misunderstanding." Before m effect, me Holy Seems fresh water is
ithout specifying who would pick u the 1998, the Vatican argued, Rome's sewer
p p p age bill was terhticaay a form of tax—and atg Paid for r. e Vatican,with
hit And
t for waste disposal. Nearly 50 years me Vatican shouldn't bepayingataxtoan- Il'salot o(weter.TheVatican.wlthitslux-
ter, as; Tiber water tamed into a toxic other state.However,the Holy See also left urious garden;closed to the public.sucks
xktail,Italy adopted law making waste the door open for a peaceful solution.Asa up en estimated 192.5 million cubic feet of
iter treatment mandatory.Acea,then an water a year,enough for a town of 60,000
conciliatory gesture. it picked Area over
m of Rome's municipal government, competitors to provide public lighting for People.
lift a network of sewage treatmantplants St.Peter's Cathedral.And,at a recent in- inc"Belination
a practicing ldbeto fideCat with he fast
id plugged the Vatican drains into the inclination would be to side Mot the Holy
stem.Most of that sewage now flows to formal meeting with Acea executives,peat See," says Palrixio Pazzagaa, who man-
e Roma Sud plant,a sprawling complex the present say,a cardinal indicated that ages 1.5 million earns worth of Acea's stock
uth of the capital that pumps 297.5 cubic the Holy See might yet agree m pay post- as part of an investment food in Rome.
!t of waste water per second through a fS98 hills' - "But, In this case, my interest as an m-
ryrinth of concrete reservoirs and bio- vestor prevails."
,rical purification tanks.
December 2, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Distribution
FROM: Patrick B. Miles
Director of Information Technology
SUBJECT: Y2K Event Staff Pay Structure and Family Member Attendance
As we move closer to completing our comprehensive Y2K planning effort, clarification
requirements pertaining to staff pay structure and family member attendance for the rollover
weekend is necessary.
On the evening of December 31", On-site staff members assigned to the Plant 1 facility are
required to check-in at the Plant 1 Control Center, Room 225 by 6:00 p.m. Plant 2 On-site staff
members are required to check-in at the Plant 2 Operations Center Training Room by 6:00 p.m.
Staff members will only be compensated for hours worked and no one should anticipate leaving
before 6:00 a.m., January 1, 2000. Please review the attached spreadsheet for details
pertaining to the compensation package.
On December 31", dinner will be served at both facilities until 7:00 p.m. Family members are
invited to attend, but must leave file facilities by 8:00 p.m. Should family members decide to
attend the dinner, it is required that they provide their own transportation, as it is mandatory that
staff members not leave their duties after they check-in. Please RSVP with Fawn Elizondo,
Communications Department, extension 7125, by December 8' should your family members
decide to attend to ensure that there are provisions available to everyone. On-site staff
members have already been taken into consideration and do not have to RSVP.
On-call staff members are invited to attend the December 31"dinner and are required to RSVP
with Fawn Elizondo by the same December 81h deadline. On-call staff members will not be
compensated while participating in the dinner meal festivities. On-call staff members assigned
to the Plant 1 facility are required to check-in at the Plant 1 Control Center, Room 225, on
January 1'at 6:00 a.m. Plant 2 On-call staff members are required to check in at the Plant 2
Operations Center Training Room at 6:00 a.m. as well.
Should anyone require any further clarification, please contact me at extension 7280.
PBM: fw
H:\wP.ftVt%I0Vnilea\Y2K Evert stall Pay sbucture and Femi)y Member AaendaMe.doc
Time Frame Staff Compensation Requirements
Regularly • $250.00' . Staff will work their
6:00 P.M. on Friday, December Operations scheduled staff . Time and one-half a normal shift.
31, 1999,through 6:00 A.M. on Additional Onsite • $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
January 1, 2000 Staff . Time and one-half pay provide response
assistance.
Additional Onsite . $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
Maintenance Staff . Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Regularly . $250.00' . Must be able to
Scheduled . Time and one-half pay if respond within 1 hour
Standby called in to respond. of being called.
Additional Onsite . $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
GSA Staff . Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Regularly . $250.00' . Must be able to
Scheduled . Time and one-half pay if respond within 1 hour
Stan by called in to respond. of being called.
Additional Onsite . $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
Other Support Staff . Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Staff
Standby . $250.00' Must be able to
. Time and one-half pay it respond within 1 hour
called in to respond. of being called.
Regularly . $250.00' • Staff will work their
6:00 A.M. on Saturday, Operations scheduled staff . Time and one-half pay normal shift.
January 1, 2000, through 6:00 Additional Onsite . $250.00' • Staff will be onsite to
P.M. Staff Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Additional Onsite . $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
Maintenance Staff . Time and one-halt pay provide assistance.
Regularly . $250.00' . Must be able to
Scheduled . Time and one-half pay if respond within 1 hour
Standby called in to respond. of being called.
Additional Onsite • $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
GSA Staff Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Regularly . $250.00' . Must be able to
Scheduled . Time and one-half pay if respond within 1 hour
Standby called in to respond. of bein called.
Additional Onsite • $250.00' . Staff will be onsite to
Other Support Staff . Time and one-half pay provide assistance.
Staff Standby . $250.00' . Must be able to
. Time and one-half pay if respond within 1 hour
called in to respond. of being called.
Employees assigned to work the Y2K event will receive one$250 incentive.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
hereby awards this.
-� 0014 .iA�. W 1M,13 CeMcate of Achievement
wl.�.� �. PaoVoly .DI54lAYE9
lu �LfcEC 563oP, n�i �• �`!`(94 to
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVE
4 FOUNTAIN VALLEY
J5 Consecutive Satisfactory Ratings Since SEPTEMBER 10, 1991
There is established in the California Vehicle`Code-a biennial motor carrier safety
compliance inspection program to beconductedby;the California Highway Patrol.
That program, known as the Biennial Inspection of Terminals (BIT) Program,
requires all motor carriers operating trucks fromlerminals located in California to
undergo an inspection of each operational terminal to rate their compliance with
applicable laws and regulations relating to motor carrier safety.
This is to certify that this terminal has achieved consecutive satisfactory safety
compliance ratings as indicated above. The'California Highway Patrol
congratulates this terminal on this meritorious achievement and recognizes
the commitment to highway safety demonstrated by the personnel responsible
for the operation of this terminal
` _ /
COMMISSIONER
11-16-W 742 DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
WPNII IIPJ 10PlOR
V
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
SPECIAL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 10, 1999
AHIAk
TgT�oy
a �
o ti
�r
w�i ti
FCr/NQ TH EH���o�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Special Workshop
11/10/99
Page 2
ROLL CALL
A Special Workshop of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
was held on November 10, 1999, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. The roll
was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
A Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
A Brian Donahue Harty Dotson
A Norman Z Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing
A Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
A Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
A Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; John Linder,
Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Layne Baroldi; Mike
Moore; Mike White; Ryal Wheeler
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Nixon, Assistant General Counsel; Don Hughes; Toby Weissert
Minutes for Special Workshop
11/10/99
Page 3
STAFF PRESENTATION RE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS
Layne Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist, reviewed the District's current biosolids
management contracts. Utilizing slides, Mr. Baroldi also went over the various options and deal
points with regard to possible acquisition of the Tule Ranch/Magan Farm, and an agreement
with the Yakima Company for biosolids land application.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
(1,A
Secretary of thel3bard bT D' cto of
Orange Countlf'Sanitation ' tnct
H:\wp.dta\agendMBoard Minu es\l 999 Board Minutes\09 %.dw
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
NOVEMBER 17, 1999
�JN A H l Tql� y
2 � 9
c
m
VWV h
Q T EN��P��
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
v 11/17/99
Page 2
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on November 17, 1999, at 6:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Lauren Cook
X Lyn Daucher Roy Moore
X Brian Donahue Harty Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
A Peter Green Dave Garofalo
X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
A Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
Shirley McCracken X Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
A Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia on Bates
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Doug Stewart; Patrick Miles; Bob
Ooten; Mike Petenan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Layne Baroldi;
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel;
5. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9, to consider the item listed on the agenda as Item No. 5(a)(1).
Minutes for Board Meeting
11/17/99
Page 3 9
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:
The Board convened in closed session at 6:10 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item No. 5(a)(1).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:19 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
RECESS
The Chair declared a recess at 7:19 p.m.
RECONVENE
The Chair reconvened the meeting at 7:24 p.m.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Debay reminded the Directors that the December Board meeting would be held on
Wednesday, December 15'", one week earlier than usual due to the holiday. In addition, she
reported that no committee meetings are scheduled for January other than the Steering
Committee on January 26".
It was then reported that CASA's mid-year meeting is scheduled for January 20" through the
22ntl. Any Director interested in attending was directed to contact Jean Tappan, the General
Manager's assistant
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of
Commendation expressing appreciation to Director of Human Resources Mike Peterman for his
contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
October 27, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratty payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 0/1 15/99 10/31/99
Totals $5,666,282.86 $4,263.465.42
Minutes for Board Meeting
11/17/99
v Page 4
CONSENT CALENDAR
10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and deny claim of Mladen
Buntich Construction Company dated October 11, 1999, in the amount of$1,157,188.00
for alleged damages in connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System,
Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the November 17, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
October 27, 1999 to be filed.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A
verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee, re the November 4, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on November 4, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget for
Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total
budget of$1,997,500.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 6 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and
Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering
services in the amount of$57,764, for a total amount not to exceed$684,054.
14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the November 10, 1999
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 10, 1999 to be fled.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers
Report for the month of October 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the First Quarter
Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 1999.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-22, Amending Policies Numbers B30.00, C10.00, C20.00, C30.00,
C150.00, D50.00, D60.00, D90.00 and F80.00 of Exhibit A of Resolution No.
Minutes for Board Meeting
11/17/99
Page 5
OCSD 98-33;Adding Policies Numbers C20.10 and C170.00 to ExhibitA of
Resolution No. 98-33; Ratifying any Additional Amendments to Exhibit A of
Resolution No. OCSD 98-33; and Ratifying that All Future Amendments to
Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be Made by Resolution re Human
Resources Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for Classification,
Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, Policies and Procedures Governing
District Employment.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve plan to restructure
and modernize the District's existing Certificates of Participation long tens
borrowings; and 2)Authorize the General Manager to execute professional
service agreements with PaineWebber, Inc. and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to
implement the COP restructuring plan.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and accept the
District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)for the year ended
June 30, 1999, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates,
Certified Public Accountants.
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-23, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of
Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts;
Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of Authority to Implement
Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8,
OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98-43.
15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Vice
Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee.
The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 9, 1999 to be filed.
18. Item removed.
17. Actions to Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
Orange County Sanitation District,Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and
Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-09:
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, gave a brief report on the ordinance, and
spoke in support of the FAHR Committee's recommendation that the District adopt the
ordinance based on a commercial user's 98/99 baseline flow. Supplemental charges
would only apply if the user increased their flow from the 98/99 baseline. It was felt that
this approach puts all industrial users on an equal footing and would be easier for staff to
administer.
Perry Shokouhi of Allstyle Apparel, Inc. was then recognized who spoke in support of the
ordinance as drafted.
Minutes for Board Meeting
11/17/99
v Page 6
Brian Keating, Facilities Manager of Kimberly Clarke in Fullerton, spoke to the Directors
and requested that they support the ordinance as drafted.
a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file General
Counsel's memo dated November 2, 1999.
Director Bankhead opposed.
b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Make finding that adoption of
Ordinance No. OCSD-11 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be
used to meet operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued
maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as
set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
Director Bankhead opposed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Ordinance
No. OCSD-11 was read by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance
No. OCSD-11, and pass to second reading and public hearing on December 15,
1999.
Director Bankhead opposed.
18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Approve an Agreement for a)the
purchase of the 1,808.15 acre portion of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kings
County for an amount not to exceed $3,254,400; b) a three-year option to purchase the
4026.58 acre portion of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kern County for an amount
not to exceed$4,545,600 contingent on obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air
compost facility on Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch, or upon the District's discretion; and c)
the retention of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a portion of the District's biosolids
for a term of three (3) years for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage
and $22.40 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern
County acreage for an annual amount not to exceed $2,540,000 for both Kings and Kern
Counties Class B biosolids` land application; and,
2)Approve an Agreement with the Yakima Company that provides for. a) the reservation
of 100,000 wet tons per year of capacity for compost and storage in consideration of the
payment of$1,250,000 upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary permits for
an open-air compost facility; b)the ability to use the Yakima Company's land application
sites for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at$25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern
County regulatory compliance fees, by the Yakima Company on their permitted sites in
Kern County during the compost site permitting and development period for an annual
amount not to exceed $775,000; c) the ability to land apply District's-produced Class A
EQ biosolids'for$25.00 per wet ton for an annual amount not to exceed $625,000; d)
the payment of a composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton plus a
prorated share of the annual permit fees for ten years at an annual amount not to
Minutes for Board Meeting
11/17/99
Page 7
exceed$2,625,000; and e) the acquisition of a Site Purchase Option to purchase all or a
portion of the compost site for a price to be determined at the time of the transaction.
19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-24.
Adopting a New Employer-Employee Relations Resolution, and Repealing Resolution
No. OCSD 98-34.
20. General Counsel reported a need for a dosed session, as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9,to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos.
18(a)(1), (2) and(3).
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:
The Board convened in dosed session at 9:00 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 20(a)(1) and (2). The
Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 20(a)(3), and no report was given.
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 9:12 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
Secr�eta�ry of a Board 9f irectors of
Orange County Sanita" District
HA .dta�agendarBoard vinNes�i 999 Board Minw"092299.doo
E ,
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22600 Orange County Sanitation District 8 427,712.67 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22601 Southern California Edison 78.885.33 Power
22602 Abesce 165.01 Hardware
22603 APEX Communications 951.28 Communication Equipment Upgrade
22604 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service
22605 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22606 Brenner-Fledler B Assoc,Inc. 53.00 Freight
22607 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22608 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 478.05 Electrical Supplies
22609 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 323.60 Plumbing Supplies
22610 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration
22611 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22612 Executive Excellence 2,600.00 Human Resources Software
22613 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,766.43 Plumbing Supplies
22614 Friend of the Court 339.60 Wage Garnishment
22615 City of Fullerton 380.21 Water Use
22616 GTE California 1,667.40 Telephone Services
N, 22617 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 67.10 Freight
r* 22618 Harcourt Brace&Co.and Subsidiaries 86.82 Publication
22619 City of Huntington Beach 24,50 Water Use
22620 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.116.18 Dues Deduction
22621 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
22622 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 249.37 Safety Supplies
22623 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 20,149.86 Misc.Construction Services
22624 Jendham,Inc. 795.00 Registration
22625 Industrial Distribution Group 25.05 Tools
22626 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 436.60 Safety Supplies
22627 Luccrs 105.00 Meeting Expense
22628 LAOUG-Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership
22629 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 943.42 Tools
22830 Optic Software 2.850.00 Optlo Forms Implementation
22631 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22632 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22633 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 301.55 Fittings
22634 OCFA 627.52 Dues Deduction
22635 Pacific Bell 20.14 Telephone Services
22636 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22637 Panametrics 8.70 Freight
22638 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22639 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 10/1199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22640 Primary Source 634.48 Office Furniture
22641 Proficiency Capital Corporation 3,222.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
22642 Quest Software 2.170.00 Service Agreement
22643 Ryan Heroo Products Corp. 64.11 Freight
22644 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies
22645 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1,400.00 Membership
22646 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 331.72 Tools/Hardware
22647 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
22648 Snap-On Incorporated 4.912.07 Tools
22649 State of California 130.23 Wage Garnishment
22650 Stale Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 6,452.19 COP Trustee Services
22651 Thompson Industrial Supply, Ina 2.830.90 Mechanical Supplies
22652 The Training Clinic 595.00 Workshop Registration
22653 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
22654 Donald F.McIntyre 426.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22655 Michael D.Moore 807.18 MeetingrFraining Expense Reimb.
22656 George L. Robertson 200.38 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb.
22657 Henry R.Salgado 991.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22658 Michelle Tuchman 451.82 Meefing/fraining Expense Reimb.
it 22659 Maroo Polo S.Velasco 370.64 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb.
y 22660 Robert Bell&Fry's Electronics 599.26 Employee Computer Loan Program
ti 22661 Robert Bell&NexCom 1,882.29 Employee Computer Loan Program
22662 Victor Ferguson&Micro Center 870.84 Employee Computer Loan Program
22663 Wayne Aegerter&Microtron Computers 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
22664 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 84,491.30 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
22665 Barclays Bank PLC 90.667.39 COP Letter of Credit
22666 RPI/Bio Gro 103.232.29 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
22667 Bristol Systems,Inc. 27,323.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
22668 Brown&Caldwell 151,927.97 Engineering Services Pl-37
22669 Carollo Engineers 61,728.14 Engineering Services-P"3, P2-50,J-25-4,J-34-1 &J-59
22670 ClarkLift of Los Angeles 40,515.06 Shelving for New Warehouse
22671 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 38,480.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K
22672 Converse Consultants 31.275.69 Consulting Services-Huntington Stale Beach Investigation
22673 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 94.832.40 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
22674 James Martin&Co. 44.557.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO 527/98
22675 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 79,846.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
22676 Olsson Construction,Inc. 44.013.00 Construction 11-27&Grading at Plant 2 Warehouse
22677 Orange County Water District 189,311.05 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
22676 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 233.994.96 Engineering Services J42
22679 Polydyne, Inc. 30,295.25 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22680 Sancen Engineering,Inc. 126.289.00 Construction-Huntington Beach Investigation&Cleaning 84'Siphon
Page 2 of 9 ® ..
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22681 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 32,791.67 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
22682 Siemens Technology 39,982.50 Air Conditioner Automation System
22683 South Coast Environmental Co. 45,903.00 Plant 2 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
22684 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 28,600.00 Weed Abatement Service
22685 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 33,158.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22686 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 586,980.00 Construction 3.35R&3.11R
22687 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 399,438.21 Construction 3-38-1
22688 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 103,401.00 Construction 2.34R
22689 Union Bank of California 44,382.01 Construction 3-38.1
22690 Union Bank of California 104,233.60 Construction 3-35
22691 Action Door Repair Corporation 191.29 Door Repairs
22692 Great American Printing Co. 282.40 Office Supplies
22693 American Airlines 8.564.35 Travel Services
22694 American Sigma, Inc. 3.395.06 Instrument Parts&Supplies
22695 Angel Scientific Products 492.38 Lab Supplies
22696 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22697 Applied Industrial Technology 84.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies
22696 Arcus Data Security 117.50 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage
22699 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 137.96 Publication
rt 22700 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
22701 Awards&Trophies By Bea 40.14 Plaques
22702 AMSA 1.340.00 Registration
22703 AMSA 18.150.00 Membership
22704 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 45.14 Telephone Service
22705 AT&T Wireless Services 759.59 Cellular Telephone Service
22706 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
22707 Baltimore C/O K.H.Watts Co. 261.84 Electrical Supplies
22708 Banctec Inc. 1,050.06 Computer Maint.
22709 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 21,055.31 Telephone Installation
22710 Battery Specialties 441.95 Batteries
22711 Benn&Associates 1,205.00 Legal Service-541-1
22712 BioMedeux Vitek, Inc. 2.534.33 Lab Supplies
22713 Bird-B-Gone 267.63 Control Netting for Atrium in Admin. Bldg.
22714 Boise Radiator Service 185.00 Truck Repairs
22715 Boutwell&Ennor,L.L.P. 1.000.00 Legal Services-401a Plan
22716 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 CAFR Report FY 98-99
22717 Southern California Marine Institute 10,528.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
22718 CaICOFI 150.00 Registration
22719 Cad R. Nelson, P.E. 980.00 Engineering Consultant 241
22720 Centrepointe Commercial Intedors 681.08 Office Furniture
22721 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2,089.91 Instrument Parts
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 10/1199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22722 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas, N.A. 8,162.75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
22723 City of Garden Grove 2,270.00 Inspection Fee 3-35R
22724 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 427.22 Lab Supplies
22725 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,743.60 Electrical Supplies
22726 Continental Laboratory Products,Inc. 3,250.80 Lab Supplies
22727 Continental Network Services 3,533.44 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
22728 Cooper Energy Services 11,713.82 Engine Supplies
22729 Corporate Express Imaging 5,737.69 Misc.Computer Supplies
22730 Corporate Express 7,046.32 Office Supplies
22731 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 221.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22732 Auditor Controller Collections 33.00 Permit Fees
22733 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,897.09 Electrical Supplies
22734 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
22735 CH2MHill 6,074.42 Engineering Services-J-31-4
22736 Confidential Mgt. Services, Inc. 1,541.85 Investigation Service
22737 CMTA-California Municipal Treasures Assoc. 450.00 Seminar Registration
22738 1999CWEASRTSC 360.00 Registration
22739 Del Mar Analytical 1.800.00 Biosolids Analysis
22740 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 19.718.24 10 Dell Computers
n 22741 Diamond H Recognition 437.88 Employee Service Awards
q 22742 Dionex Corporation 1,642.12 Lab Supplies
,rn 22743 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 16,100.00 Painting Mainl.Services MO 4-22-98
22744 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 552.07 Paint Supplies
22745 DDB Engineering,Inc. 18,259.00 Temporary Employment Services
22746 DGA Consultants, Inc. 3,804.65 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
22747 Eberhard Equipment 138.15 Tractor Repair
22748 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 145.00 Medical Screening
22749 Electra-Bond 5,682.27 Pump Supplies
22750 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 3.050.00 Safety Training
22761 Enchanter, Inc. 4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22752 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 12,606.99 Professional Services J-40-4
22753 Faxpress, Inc. 2.591.44 O6ice Supplies
22754 FedEx Corporation 24.36 Air Freight
22755 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 119.39 Plumbing Supplies
22756 Fibertron 298A5 Fiber Optic Cable
22767 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 880.33 Lab Supplies
22768 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering, Inc. 20,680.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
22769 Fountain Valley Camera 51.47 Photo Supplies
22760 Future Electronics 55.76 Electrical Supplies
22761 Ganahl Lumber Company 2.272.51 Lumber/Hardware
22762 Garlock Gaskets-Technologies 2000 80.00 Registration
Page 4 of 9 v •,
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22763 GarraB-Callahan Company 2,080.11 Chemicals
22764 Garvey Resources, Inc. 1,975.50 Legal Service-Kern County Ordinance
22765 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,425.12 Fiberglass Repair
22766 GTE California 1,949.05 Telephone Services
22767 Genium Publishing Corp. 20.85 Publication
22768 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 7,282.39 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
22769 Government Finance Officers Association 55.00 Subscription
22770 WW Grainger, Inc. 4.552.11 Compressor Supplies
22771 Graphic Distributors 678.83 Photographic Supplies
22772 Graseby S.T.I. 7.479.10 Engine Supplies
22773 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2,436.72 Fiberglass Grating
22774 Graybar Electric Company 2,496.89 Electrical Supplies
22775 Great Westem Sanitary Supplies 64.00 Janitorial Supplies
22778 GST, Inc./Micro City 23.06 Office Supplies
22777 Haaker Equipment Company 1,772.73 Truck Supplies
22778 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 15,476.82 Truck Supplies
22779 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 37.40 Catering Services
22780 HIM. Inc. 352.73 Toole
N, 22781 Hoemiger Service, Inc. 658.55 Compressor Parts
rt 22782 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 8,788.95 Engineering Services 2-41
�,;' 22783 Home Depot 189.36 Small Hardware
rn 22784 Hopkins Technical Products 721.80 Pump Supplies
22786 Horizon Technology 2,004.66 Lab Supplies
22786 Hub Auto Supply 593.39 Truck Parts
22787 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 1.140.35 Pump Supplies
22788 Imaging Plus,Inc. 7.25 Office Supplies
22789 Independent Rigging 120.00 Lab Supplies
22790 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental
22791 S1ateNet 200.00 Online Service
22782 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 278.00 Lab Supplies
22793 Intermec Corporation 327.45 Computer Supplies
22794 Interstate Battery Systems 459.02 Batteries
22795 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.99 Photographic Services
22796 IBM Corporation 1,475.55 IBM AS1400 Upgrade
22797 J&B Auto Parts 222.57 Auto Parts&Supplies
22798 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 4,009.80 Instrument Supplies
22799 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 510.00 Training Registration
22800 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 5,954.50 Misc.Construction Services
22801 Jay's Catering 160.55 Catering Services
22802 Johnstone Supply 329.87 Electrical Supplies
22803 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 13,125.00 Engineering Services 241
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22UK K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 6.016.96 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
22805 Kelly Paper 55.92 Paper
22806 Industrial Distribution Group 1,509.29 Tools
22807 Kris Kaligian 275.00 Contractual Services-Writing
22808 Lab Support 9,920.38 Temporary Employment Services
22809 LaserAll Corp. 724.10 Printer Service Agreement
22810 La Mode Chemical Products 575.46 Sulfide Test Ka
22811 Lexis-Nexis 343.75 Books 8 Publications
22812 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.88 Welding Supplies
22813 MarVac Electronics 141.79 Instrument Supplies
22814 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1,520.56 Plumbing Supplies
22815 Mellon Trust 15,405.83 Investment Custodian Bank
22816 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.373.00 Mechanical Repairs
22817 Mission Abrasive 5 Janitorial Supplies 8,572.62 Toots&Supplies
22818 Mission Uniform Service 3.380.33 Uniform Rentals
22819 Mitchell Instrument Co. 167.00 Instruments
22820 Moffatt 8 Nichol Engineers 8,964.37 Engineering Service 5-41-1
22821 Moreland&Associates 6,564.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
F,- 22822 Morton Salt 788.80 Salt
rr 22823 MotoPhoto 69.57 Photographic Services
22624 Museum Shops 91.68 Publication
o` 22825 MS Abrasive Cleaning Equipment, Inc. 226.48 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
22826 NatWest Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
22827 National Plant Services,Inc. 11.587.50 Vacuum Truck Services
22828 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 6,036.00 Training Registration
22829 Neal Supply Co. 151.60 Plumbing Supplies
22830 Network Generations.Inc. 19,890.65 Computer Supplies
22831 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1,192.00 Training Registration-Computer
22832 Newark Electronics 851.72 Instrument Supplies
22833 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 10.592.44 Lubricent/Diesel Fuel
22834 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 17.498.80 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
22835 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.427.46 Office Supplies
22836 Orange County Vector Control District 215.08 Pest Control
22837 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 515.26 Electrical Supplies
22838 Orange Courier 87.30 Courier Services
22839 Oxygen Service Company 1.203.89 Specialty Gases
22840 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 81.46 Electrical Supplies
22841 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
22842 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4.069.50 Plumbing Supplies
22843 Pacific Southwest Group 6,503.48 Professional Service-Beach Closure
22844 Pagenet 1,547.19 Rental Equipment
Page 6 of 9 c
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22845 Parts Unlimited 771.34 Truck Supplies
22846 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 3D4.40 Filters
22847 Pinkerton Systems Integration 13,360.82 Security Card Reader System
22848 Pitney Bowes 353.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
22849 Cambridge Integrated Service 2.083.33 Worker's Camp. Claims Admin.
22850 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 7,007.84 Temporary Employment Services
22851 Projects Partners 15,406.00 Temporary Employment Services
22852 PCs Express 20.00 Courier Service
22853 PFT/Alexander Service, Inc. 381.35 Instrument Supplies
22054 PRIMA-Public Risk Management Assoc. 255.00 Membership
22855 Quickstart Technologies 1.700.00 Training Registration
22856 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 199.08 Instrument Supplies
22857 Restek Corp 2,820.79 Lab Supplies
22858 Right Click Software 59.95 Publication
22859 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 8,005.56 Pump Supplies
22860 RPM Electric Motors 1.127.74 Electric Motor Repair
22861 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 457.69 Paint Supplies
22862 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 268.00 Mechanical Supplies
H. 22863 Schwing America,Inc. 4.787.21 Pump Supplies
rr 22864 City of Seal Beach 297A4 Water Use
b 22865 Second-Sun 30.56 Light Fixtures
22866 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,374.47 Tools/Hardware
22867 Sierra Automated Valve Services,Inc. 808.00 Electrical Maint.
22866 Sigma Chemical Co. 1,652.02 Lab Supplies
22869 So.Cal.Gas Company 1.510.37 Natural Gas
22870 SoftChoice 1,014.67 Software
22871 Sonic Systems, Inc. 1,629.75 Computer Supplies
22872 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,241.60 Emission Fees
22873 Spectrum Geophysics 9,720.00 Professional Service-Ground Radar Study
22874 Standard&Poors 2,500.00 Analytical Services
22875 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 1,297.38 Pump Supplies
22876 Starbuck Truck Refinishing,Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service
22877 State Board of Equalization 766.47 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee
22878 Sterling Art 174.12 Art Supplies
22879 Strata International,Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
22880 Summit Steel 228.22 Metal
22881 Sunset Ford 74.78 Truck Supplies
22882 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
22883 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 445.11 Electric Cart Parts
22884 The Meniwood Corporation 7,416.82 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
22885 The Orange County Register 1,530.90 Notices&Ads
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22886 Finnigan-A ThermoOuest Subsidiary 76.57 Lab Supplies
22887 Thomas Bros. Maps 1,198.15 Printing
22888 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 150.97 Mechanical Supplies
22889 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
22890 Tom Dickey 317.00 Travel Expense Reimb.
22891 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 355.65 Locks&Keys
22892 Toshiba International Corporation 2,328.89 Electrical Supplies
22893 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 14.55 Traffic Safely Equipment Rental
22894 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 336.00 Lab Services
22895 TCH Associates, Inc. 4,139.55 Lab Supplies
22896 Teksystems 5.875.00 Temporary Employment Services
22897 United Parcel Service 31.31 Parcel Services
22898 V&A Consulting Engineers 6,373.51 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
22899 Valcom 57.88 Software
22900 Valley Cities Supply Company 625.62 Plumbing Supplies
22901 Valley Splicing Co. 500.00 Equipment Repair
22902 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 23,726.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
22903 Varian Chromatography Systems 2.363.93 Equipment Maint.
N, 22904 Veme's Plumbing 12.040.00 Plumbing Supplies
rT 22905 Village Nurseries 53.47 Landscaping Supplies
9' 22906 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 17,922.65 Lab Supplies
cD 22907 The Wackenhut Corporation 15,264.26 Security Guards
22908 Waters Corporation 1.354.84 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment
22909 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 54.77 Electrical Supplies
22910 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 22,120.20 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22911 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 7,375.06 Instrument Supplies
22912 Worklview Travel 376.00 Travel Service
22913 Xerox Corporation 8.243.52 Copier Leases
22914 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 16,361.00 Construction 5-41-1
22915 Advance Contactors, Inc. 15.496.00 Construction 541-1
22916 CNA Trust 3.540.00 Construction 5-41-1
22917 First Fire Systems, Inc. 174.20 Construction Contract J-57
22918 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 12.028.00 Construction 7-28
22919 NCCI Enterprises,Inc. 1,975.59 Engineering Services 240
22920 Gary L.Aguirre 164.34 Meetingrrraining Expense Relmb.
22921 Stephen J.Bunill 314.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22922 Deon M.Carrico 248.12 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22923 Arnold G.Chavez 30.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22924 James E.Colston 317.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22925 Ronald L. DewiB,Jr. 261.80 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
22926 Darrell S.Ennis 208.34 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
Page 8 of 9 .� .,
Claims Paid From 10/1/99 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22927 Timothy D.Foley 243.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22928 Tom E.Gsworskl 211.23 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb.
22929 John G.Gonzalez 222.70 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
22930 Ingrid G. Hellebrand 502.30 Meeling/rralning Expense Reimb.
22931 Roy Perrino 182.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22932 Brian K.Reed 340.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22933 Michael Reideler 257.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22934 George L. Robertson 804.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22935 Mary S.Thompson 247.08 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimb.
22936 Jane H.Tran 201.99 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb.
22937 Joseph F.Vallone 211.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22938 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1.935.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22939 Orange County Sanitation District 1,164.28 Party Cash Reimb.
22940 James L.Wybenga 204.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22941 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
22942 Pinnacle One 17,375.00 Legal Service 11.17.1
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.288.307.54
Payroll Disbursements
rr 15817.15941 Employee Paychecks $ 164,833.31 Biweekly Payroll 1016199
9' 15942- 15943 Employee Paychecks 16,377.04 Termination 8 Adjustment
42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 667.979.21 Biweekly Payroll 1016/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 849,189.56
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,689.01 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 204,256.17 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 174.780.68 September Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments It 528,725.76
Total Claims Paid 1011/99 .10115199 $ 5,666,282.86
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 10/18/99 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22943 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. $ 36.157.02 Consulting Services-FIS Support
22944 Orange County Sanitation District 425.933.06 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22946 Southern California Edison 48.150.52 Power
22946 Allied Management Resources, Inc. 750.00 Legal Service-Burge Claim
22947 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 144.60 Mechanical Supplies
22946 American Express 4,659.16 Purchasing Card Program
22949 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.28 Telephone Service
22950 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 450.14 Valve Supplies
22951 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22952 Carl Warren&Co. 1,023.02 Insurance Claims Administrator
22953 Chinh Do 1,203.77 Vehicle Damage Claim
22954 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22955 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 338.87 Plumbing Supplies
22958 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22957 Court Order 766.50 Wage Garnishment
22958 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 8,465.17 Plumbing Supplies
22959 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
r* 22980 GTE California 5.262.55 Telephone Services
tp 22961 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,116.18 Dues Deduction
22962 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use
22963 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 207.84 Safety Supplies
22964 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 6,932.00 Misc. Construction Services
22965 Maintenance Technology Corp. 940.23 Welding Supplies
22966 MarVac Electronics 201.45 Instrument Supplies
22967 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 38.25 Tools
22968 Mission Uniform Service 128.96 Uniform Rentals
22969 Motion Industries 53.09 Pump Supplies
22970 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22971 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22972 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 547.14 Electrical Supplies
22973 OCEA 629.14 Dues Deduction
22974 Pacific Bell 62.69 Telephone Services
22975 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22976 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment
22977 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
22978 Scott, Reilly&Whitehead 46.25 Legal Services-Human Resources Issues
22979 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 53.93 Tools
22980 Sharp Claim Services 85.00 Appraisal Service
22981 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 61.92 Tools/Hardware
Page 1 of 10 .. •�
Claims Paid From 10116/99 to 10131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22982 Snap On Industrial 3,139.65 Hardware
22983 So. Cal.Gas Company 13,403.57 Natural Gas
22984 Stale of California 133.35 Wage Garnishment
22985 StudioVisia 19,360.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint.
22986 Summit Steel 270.98 Metal
22987 Tomell&Cotten 854.80 Legal Service-Burge Claim
22988 The Unisource Corporation 7,024.80 Office Supplies
22989 United Way 307.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22990 Gerardo Amezcua 372.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22991 Blake Anderson 531.89 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22992 Catherine M. BIele 307.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22993 David P. Halverson 1.005,18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22994 Thomas A. Hunt 334.54 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22995 William F.Webster,Jr. 997.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22996 Aerochem, Inc. 1.941.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
22997 Air Industries Corporation 7.784.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
22998 Voided Check - -
22999 Anaheim General Hospital 993.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
rt 23000 Burlington Engineering, Inc. 971.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23001 Chapman Hospital 154.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23002 Chrome Technology, Inc. 435.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23003 Huntington Beach Medical Center 1.504.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23004 Continuous Coating 1.904.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23005 Coming OCA Corp. 1.076.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23006 Disc Manufacturing, Inc. 911.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23007 Electrorack Products Co.,Inc. 857.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23008 Fullerton Foods/Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. 1.471.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23009 La Habra Plating 174.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23010 La Palma Inlercommunily Hospital 995.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23011 Launderiand 53.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23012 M.S. Bellows 213.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23013 Micrometals, Inc. 92 1,235.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23014 Monarch Precision Debuning Co. 1,144.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23015 Orange Container 2,933.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23016 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 3,865.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23017 Pentadyne/Penta0ex,Inc. 537.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23018 Pllkington Aerospace 20,400.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23019 Pure Chem Products Co. 158.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23020 Rainbow Disposal Co, Inc. 646.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23021 Ricoh Electronics#2 2.614.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 2 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16199 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23022 RBC Transport Dynamics 169.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23023 South Bay Chrome Sales 583.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23024 St Jude Medical Center 8.512.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23025 Sunclipse, Inc. 5,1 17.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23026 T&P Plating Corporation 152.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23027 Taormina Industries, Inc.#4 685.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23028 United Custom Polishing&Plating 637.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23029 Universal Circuits,Inc. 1.871.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23030 Val Circuits#5 165.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23031 Y K K(USA),Inc. 1.628.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23032 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,190.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
23033 Orange County Sanitation District 18,394.78 Worker's Comp. Reimb.
23034 Robert C.Thompson 1.185.71 Meating?raining Expense Reimb.
23035 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 33.365.00 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
23036 Blue Cross of California 176.053.12 Medical Insurance Premium
23037 Boyle Engineering Corporation 38,682.56 Engineering Services P1 41 &7-27
23038 Bristol Systems, Inc. 30.060.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
23039 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 90,418.46 26 Computers,5 Printers,4 Monitors& 1 Server
�r 23040 Delta Dental 41,647.47 Dental Insurance Plan
tp 23041 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 103,601.05 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
w 23042 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,858.10 Medical Insurance Premium
23043 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 108,310.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
23044 Orange County Water District 58,103.94 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
23045 OCB Reprographics 27,660.43 Printing Service-Spec P-173
23M P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 29,204.45 Electrical Supplies
23047 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 133,843.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23048 Polydyne, Inc. 30,982.50 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
23049 Realtime Systems Corporation 79,070.00 Software Maint. Service
23050 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 220.274.70 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
23051 SPEC Services, Inc. 127,848.62 Engineering Services J-33-1
23052 Tran Consulting Engineers 60,000.00 Consulting Services-Misc. Small Capital Projects
23053 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 33,458.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23054 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 61,565.33 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
23055 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 73,899.28 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
23056 Ark Construction Company 47,460.96 Construction Pi-444
23057 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 73,368.20 Construction P2-65
23058 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 35,845.09 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
23059 S.S. Mechanical Corporation 112,443.27 Construction P1 46-2
23060 Southern Contracting Company 156,708.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
23061 Academic Press 7.76 Publication
Page 3 of 10 '° "�
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23062 Aearo Company 137.00 Safety Supplies
23063 Air Products&Chemicals 23,458.33 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
23064 Airborne Express 47.50 Air Freight
23065 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies
23066 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 7,344.24 Manhole Frames&Covers
23067 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 19,152.40 Dispute Analysis& Report
43068 Analysts, Inc. 2,145.84 Testing Kits
23069 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
23070 Appleone Employment Service 15,130.88 Temporary Employment Services
23071 Applied Industrial Technology 1.451.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies
23072 Arcus Data Security 106.80 Ofisite Back-Up Tape Storage
23073 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,040.00 Vacuum Truck Services
23074 Art's Disposal Service, Inc. 558.36 Waste Removal
23075 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement
23076 Awards&Trophies By Bea 197.94 Plaques
23077 American Air Filter International 1.388.62 Filler
23078 AMP Incorporated 2,085.00 Registration
N. 23079 AMSA 335.00 Registration
23080 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 372.65 Telephone Service
23081 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 10.75 Telephone Service
a 23082 Battery Specialties 991.21 Batteries
23083 Bauer Compressors 261.74 Safety Supplies
23084 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobelt Crafts) 648.10 Office Supplies
23085 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 58.99 Publication
23086 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,128.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
23087 Cal-Glass, Inc. 134.69 Lab Equipment Service
23088 California Automatic Gate 270.56 Service Agreement
23089 Calpelra 890.00 Registration
23090 CalCoast-City of Huntington Beach 1,000.00 Coastal Symposium Membership
23091 Career Track 387.00 Registration
23092 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 17.75 Courier Service
23093 Century Paint 207.74 Paint Supplies
23094 Charles P. Crowley Co. 704.73 Instrument Parts
23095 Cheyenne Livestock&Products, Inc. 2,875.00 Storage Cabinets
23096 City Office Furniture,Inc. 386.77 Office Supplies
23097 ClarkLift of Los Angeles 3,895.50 Pallet Racks
23098 Clean Air Report 1,665.00 Subscription
23099 Commercial Door Company, Inc. 3,378.00 Roof Hatch
23100 Connell GM Parts 520.05 Truck Supplies
Pane 4 of 1n
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23101 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 5,093.48 Electrical Supplies
23102 Consolidated Plastics Company 122.22 Lab Supplies
23103 Continental Network Services 8,033.42 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
23104 Converse Consultants 5.227.18 Consulting Services-Huntington State Beach Investigation
23105 Cooper Energy Services 2,010.02 Engine Supplies
23106 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1,28220 Copier Lease
23107 Corporate Express 1.770.23 Office Supplies
23108 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09
23109 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 6,749.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
23110 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 19,888.99 SARI Line Protection Reimb.
23111 County of Orange 70.00 Permit Fees
23112 County Wholesale Electric Co. 182.16 Electrical Supplies
23113 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 300.00 Conference Registration
23114 CR 8 R, Inc. 3.192.00 Container Rentals
23115 CWEA Membership 205.00 Membership
��pIII 23116 David's Tree Service 14.710.00 Tree Maint. Service
23117 Del Mar Analytical 536.00 Biosolids Analysis
23118 Drexelbrook Go Patten Corporation 4,161.76 Instrument Supplies
rr 23119 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 19.61 Paint Supplies
Ui23120 DMG-Maximus 15,170.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
23121 JWC Environmental 6,880.88 Mechanical Maint. Service
23122 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 157.00 Medical Screening
23123 Eldridge Products 1,444.73 Instrument Maint. Service
23124 Elsevier Science 802.00 Publication
23125 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
23126 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies
23127 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 3.871.02 Software License
23128 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,153.67 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
23129 Environmental Professionals Organization 39.00 Registration
23130 Faxpress, Inc. 1,431.24 Office Supplies
23131 FedEx Corporation 429.56 Air Freight
23132 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 359.67 Plumbing Supplies
23133 Fibertron 1,841.97 Fiber Optic Cable
23134 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
23135 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,200.75 Lab Supplies
23130 Flo-Systems, Inc. 10,880.28 Pump Supplies
23137 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering, Inc. 20.240.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
23138 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,071.56 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
23139 Fountain Valley Camera 75.34 Photo Supplies
23140 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 455.50 Truck Wash Tickets
Page 5 of 10 •�
Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23141 Fox Bay Industries 91.70 Office Supplies
23142 Fry's Electronics 990.41 Computer Supplies
23143 Ganahl Lumber Company 16.86 Lumber/Hardware
23144 Garratt-Callahan Company 5,379.96 Chemicals
23145 GTE California 610.15 Telephone Services
23146 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
23147 Gieriich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,644.74 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
23148 W W Grainger,Inc. 194.98 Compressor Supplies
23149 Graphic Distributors 270.50 Photographic Supplies
23150 Greseby S.T.I. 820.75 Engine Supplies
23151 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 637.23 Janitorial Supplies
23152 Haaker Equipment Company 3,666.97 Truck Supplies
23153 Hach Company 158.77 Lab Supplies
23154 Harcourt Brace&Co.and Subsidiaries 66.60 Publication
23155 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples
23156 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 72.62 Plumbing Supplies
23157 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 114.30 Catering Services
23158 Hilo, Inc. 550.31 Tools
rr 23159 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 3,448.17 Compressor Pans
mr 23160 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium
a. 23161 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 18,379.66 Engineering Services 2-41
23162 Home Depot 710.19 Small Hardware
23163 Hopkins Technical Products 87.12 Pump Supplies
23164 Hub Auto Supply 32.08 Truck Parts
23186 City of Huntington Beach 12.503.19 Water Use
23166 Imaging Plus, Inc. 115.50 Office Supplies
23167 Impulse 382.88 Lab Supplies
23168 Intermec Corporation 10,111.07 Computer Supplies
23169 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.71 Photographic Services
23170 Irvine Ranch Water District 23.28 Water Use
23171 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 18.402.75 Safety Supplies
23172 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 31.45 Training Expenses
23173 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 21,913.97 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
23174 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 10.398.00 Misc. Construction Services
23175 Jay's Catering 796.53 Catering Services
23176 Johnstone Supply 2.130.84 Electrical Supplies
23177 Jordan Controls 320.62 Annual Membership Renewal
23178 Kelly Paper 201.19 Paper
23179 Industrial Distribution Group 4,326.24 Tools
23180 Lab Support 11,107.02 Temporary Employment Services
Page 6 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16199 to 10131199
warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23181 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 260.63 Galvanize Beams
23182 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,619.21 Mechanical Supplies
23183 Maintenance Technology Corp. 339.07 Welding Supplies
23184 MarVac Electronics 97.06 Instrument Supplies
23185 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 702.10 Tools
23186 Mec Analytical System 2,076.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
23187 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 2.000.00 Software Mainl.Agreement
23188 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,673.45 Mechanical Repairs
23189 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 439.01 Tools&Supplies
23190 Mission Uniform Service 3,317.72 Uniform Rentals
23191 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,426.00 Instruments
23192 MotoPholo 73.92 Photographic Services
23193 National Audio-Visual Supply 79.87 Office Supplies
23194 National Institute of Bids&Technology 735.00 Lab Supplies
23195 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automaton
{{{qqq 23196 National Plant Services, Inc. 1,587.50 Vacuum Truck Services
23197 Neal Supply Co. 20.20 Plumbing Supplies
23198 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 8,344.00 Training Registration-Computer
rt 23199 City of Newport Beach 109.48 Water Use
tp 23200 Nicholas Chevrolet 13.95 Truck Repairs
23201 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 7,054.40 LubricantlDiesel Fuel
23202 The Norco Companies 282.40 Mail Delivery Service
23203 NAB Associates, Inc. 1,493.25 Lab Services
23204 NovaTech Lighting Systems 1,159.80 Electrical Supplies
23205 Netsol 860.80 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade
23206 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,592.22 Office Supplies
23207 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 64.41 Plumbing Supplies
23208 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.66 Electrical Supplies
23209 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Service Agreement
23210 Oxygen Service Company 2.050.86 Specialty Gases
23211 Pacific Bell 1,078.46 Telephone Services
23212 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5,933.18 Plumbing Supplies
23213 Parts Unlimited 52.06 Truck Supplies
23214 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 5,252.17 Filters
23215 Port Supply 37.71 Rope
23216 Powerware 170.41 Publication
23217 Cambridge Integrated Service 2.083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin.
23218 Primary Source 260.25 Office Furniture
23219 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 6,507.28 Temporary Employment Services
23220 Professional Procurement Seminars 4,770.00 Training Registration
Page 7 of 10 a �,
Claims Paid From 10116/99 to 10131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23221 Projects Partners 17,B46.67 Temporary Employment Services
23222 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
23223 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
23224 R.T.Corporation 256.00 Lab Supplies
23225 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
23226 Ramoo Specialty Products 823.79 Chemical
23227 Red Wing Shoes 116.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
23228 Reliastar 7,760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
23229 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,557.36 Life Insurance Premium
23230 Rosen Electrical 2.265.12 Electrical Supplies
23231 Rota Rooter-S.O.C.#51 1,354.66 Clean&Video Tape Hunt.Stale Beach Sewer Lines
23232 Royce Instrument Corporation 5.029.08 Instrument Supplies
23233 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,875.00 Engineering Services-Crane Safety
23234 RSA Sutter Soil Products 612.83 Soil Materials
23235 Safety-Kleen 561.29 Service Agreement
23236 Santa Ana Electric Motors 674.52 Motor Repair
23237 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 325.03 Mechanical Supplies
23238 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 725.39 Specialty Gases
N 23239 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 563.60 Lab Repairs
23240 Sears Industrial Sales 922.46 Mechanical Supplies
oa 23241 Second-Sun 193.37 Light Fixtures
23242 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 343.36 Tools/Hardware
23243 Siemon,Larsen &Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
23244 Sievers Instruments 1,491.55 Lab Supplies
23245 Supelco,Inc. 440.00 Lab Supplies
23246 So. Cal. Gas Company 602.97 Natural Gas
23247 SoBView Computer Products 208.50 Computer Supplies
23248 Southern California Edison Company 160.00 Publication
23249 Southwest Scientific Inc. 1,535.06 Instrument Supplies
23250 Sparkletts 2,016.72 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
23251 Specialty Technical Publishers,Inc. 260.75 Publication
23252 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 332.30 Lab Supplies
23253 State Water Resources Control Board 10,000.00 Annual NPDES Permit Fee
23254 Summit Steel 176.40 Metal
23255 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4.420.00 Landscape Maint.
23256 Sunset Industrial Parts 838.79 Mechanical Supplies
23257 Solar Turbines, Inc. 1.268.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23258 SWRCB Accounting Office 400.00 Annual Fee
23259 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 82.21 Electric Cart Parts
23260 Teamwodd Corporate Programs 122.27 Tools
Page 8 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23261 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 64.13 Publication
23262 Tekmar-Dohnnan 1.733.59 Lab Supplies
23263 Thermo Optek Corporation 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Service Agreement
23264 Thomas Bros. Maps 390.49 Printing
23265 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,573.62 Mechanical Supplies
23266 Thyssen Dover Elevator 1,439.10 Elevator Maintenance
23267 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 94.00 Locks 8 Keys
23268 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 458.99 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
23269 The Trans Company 2,830.00 Electrical Equipment Maint. Service
23270 Transcat 5,401.01 Electrical Supplies
23271 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 10,277.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
23272 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 150.80 Truck Supplies
23273 Truesdall Laboratories, Inc. 80.00 Lab Services
23274 Two Wheels One Planet 286.43 Bicycle Supplies
23275 TDI-Brooks International 4,550.00 Lab Supplies
23276 Teksystems 7,362.50 Temporary Employment Services
23277 TRW EMCICalibration Services 2,455.00 Equipment Certification
23278 Ultra Scientific 341.66 Lab Supplies
n 23279 United Parcel Service 715.16 Parcel Services
if 23280 Unocal 76 65.16 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1
W 23281 Valley Cities Supply Company 602.62 Plumbing Supplies
23282 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 22,267.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
23283 Veme s Plumbing 200.00 Plumbing Supplies
23284 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.373.18 Vision Service Premium
23285 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7.420.71 Lab Supplies
23286 Waxie Sanitary Supply 825.80 Janitorial Supplies
23267 Western States Chemical, Inc. 8,573.18 Caustic Soda MO 6-23-95
23288 Xerox Corporation 11.529.00 Copier Leases
23289 Systems Integrated 10.291.88 Construction Services J-31-3
23290 Jeffrey Brown 975.98 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
23291 Pongsakdi Cady 766.06 Meetingri mining Expense Reimb.
23292 Vladimir A. Kogan 978.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23293 Roland T. McReynolds 156.82 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
23294 Michael D. Moore 1.931.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23295 Adrian Renescu 1,236.57 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimb.
23296 Mahin Talebi 742.58 MeelinglTraining Expense Reimb.
23297 Edward M.Torres 1.162.89 Meeling/Training Expense Reimb.
23296 Charles F.Winsor 922.01 Meeling?raining Expense Reimb.
23299 Moyasar T.Yahya 907.81 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb.
23300 Paula A. Zeller 456.13 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
Page 9 of 10 o er
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23301 Alum-A-Them 1,186.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23302 Orange County Sanitation District 903.54 Petty Cash Relmb.
23303 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership
23304 County of Orange 850.00 Permit Fee
23305 County of Orange 38.00 Permit Fee
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,418,262.43
Payroll Disbursements
15944. 16091 Employee Paychecks $ 174,043.45 Biweekly Payroll 10/20/99
18092-16092 Employee Paycheck 98.55 Adjustment
42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 673,061.99 Biweekly Payroll 10/20/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 847,203.99
Total Claims Paid 10116199.10131/99 $ 4,263,466.42
Y
pN
l
O
Page 10 of 10
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I TOBG.of oil.
z Is/sg
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item r9umber
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
\YpmbYetMy..U1Kn\}M,WI.s\'MFRES`tfvn WFC Ea
aw„e.. sense Page 1
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/1/99 -- 11/15/99 & 11/16/99 — 11/30/99.
BA
11etEpbala�vy.UI�VnV3Pe'4N�aM9FRE5Ylfmfp9q pK
Page 2
Claims Paid From 1111199 to 11115M
Warrant NO. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
23305 First Fire Systems,Inc. $ 35,745.05 Construction Contract J-57
23307 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 71,181.55 Construction 7-17
23308 Orange County Sanitation District 411,363.44 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
23309 Southern California Edison 62,966.70 Power
23310 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,256.42 Long Distance Telephone Service
23311 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 14,443.49 Construction Pl-36-1
23312 Ponton Industries 24,351.48 Lab Parts&Supplies
23313 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service
23314 AT&T Wireless Service 4,686.45 Cellular Telephone Service
23315 AT&T Wireless Services 616.91 Cellular Telephone Service
23316 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
23317 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
23318 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
23319 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,071.19 Electrical Supplies
23320 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 353.80 Plumbing Supplies
23321 CWEA Membership 66.00 Membership
23322 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
23323 Robert C.Dixon 1,192.25 Legal Service-Kem County Ordinance
23324 Emech Design,Inc. 5,381.00 Instrument Supplies
23325 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
23326 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 1.936.29 Plumbing Supplies
23327 Franchise Tax Board 113.25 Wage Garnishment
23328 Friend of the Court 339.60 Wage Garnishment
23329 GTE California 741.83 Telephone Services
23330 L.Kevin Hadrian 1.249.39 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23331 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 222.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23332 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Loral 501 1,101.87 Dues Deduction
23333 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
23334 League Of Ca Cities 320.00 Meeting Expense
23336 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 82.68 Tools
23336 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,827.20 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23337 Network Catalyst, Inc. 21.364.11 Computer Supplies
23338 City of Newport Beach 13.87 Water Use
23339 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
23340 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Gamishment
23341 OCEA 620.43 Dues Deduction
23342 Pacific Bell 17.20 Telephone Services
23343 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
23344 Parker Hannifin Corporation 299.86 Mechanical Supplies
23345 Parkhouse Tire Co. 290.53 Tires
23346 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From 1111/99 to 11115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23347 Peace Officers Council of CA 774.00 Dues Deduction
23348 Reliastar 10.465.38 Employee Mediwl Health Premium
23349 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,272.43 Tools
23350 Shasta Electric LP. 10.722.00 Construction Services-Security Gate Relocation
23351 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,509.45 Tools/Hardware
23352 Siemon, Larsen 8 Marsh 2.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
23353 Snap-On Tools 54.62 Tools
23354 State of California 134.39 Wage Garnishment
23355 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,636.87 Mechanical Supplies
23356 Toro Aire,Inc. 19,986.55 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies
23357 Union Bank of California 83826 Banking Services
23358 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
23359 UC Regents 410.00 Registration
23360 Robert M. Bell 73.05 Meeting/Training Expense Remo.
23361 Rebecca A.Brooks 641-10 Meet ngrfraining Expense Reimb.
23362 Mark Castillo 1,172.93 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
23363 Robed P.Ghirelli 138.62 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb.
23364 L.Kevin Hadden 636.39 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimb.
23365 Samuel L.Mowbray 1,139.43 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
23366 Fred J.O'Brien 615.09 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
23367 John W.Swindler 838.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23368 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,305,00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
23369 Kaynar Mfg. Div.of Kaynar Tech. 2.851.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23370 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership
23371 Brown 8 Caldwell 180.974.26 Engineering Service P1-37
23372 Camp Dresser 8 McKee, Inc. 71,216.00 Engineering Service JA0-3
23373 Carollo Engineers 87.685.47 Engineering Service J-39
23374 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 27,487.03 12 Computers 81 Computer Workstation
23375 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 102,327.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4.22-98
23376 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 34,084.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
233T7 Orange County Water District 59.018.30 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
23378 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 124.762.06 Engineering Services J-42
23379 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 128.608.02 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
23380 Pm Logis Trust 60,899.00 Connection Fee Refund
23381 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 39,224.19 Construction Pi-37
23382 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 76,340.07 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
23383 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 294,692.40 Construction 3-36R&3-11R
23394 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 354,789.75 Construction 3.38-1
23386 Mike Prlich 8 Sons 82.491.50 Construction 6-12
23386 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 66,291.63 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
23387 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 150.959.00 Construction 7-28
23388 Union Bank of California 39,421.09 Construction 3-38-1
Page 2 of 8 a, -
Claims Paid From 11/1199 to 11115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23389 Union Bank of California 32.743.60 Construction 3-35
23390 A-Plus Systems 1,223.04 Notices 8 Ads
23391 Great American Printing Co. 431.93 Office Supplies
23392 Air Cold Supply 62.02 Air Conditioner Repairs
23393 Air Products 8 Chemicals 23,756.44 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
23394 Aladdin House 323.56 Window Blinds
23395 American Airlines 5.099.59 Travel Services
23396 American Industrial Hygiene Association 2,584.00 Training Materials
23397 American Management Association 396.00 Registration
23398 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 495.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
23399 APPleone Employment Service 7.239.03 Temporary Employment Services
23400 Applied Industrial Technology 664.37 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
23401 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal
23402 ABL,Inc. 199.00 Subscription
23403 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 8,500.00 Professional Services-Flaw Monitoring Project
23404 ASR Analysis 320.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1
23405 Boise Radiator Service 505.19 Truck Repairs
23406 Bristol Systems,Inc. 15,680.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
23407 Buena Park Community Hospital 482.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23408 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1,645.22 Publication
23409 C.F.Tool 350.00 Tools
23410 Calif Centrifugal Pump 517.20 Pump Supplies
23411 Carl Warren 8 Co. 958.95 Insurance Claims Administrator
23412 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 3,426.65 Office Furniture
23413 City of Fountain Valley 890.00 Fire Dept. Permit Fee
23414 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 1,748.53 Professional Services-Ergonomic
23415 Clement-Tyme 134.69 Ride Share Incentive Prizes
23416 Coast Fire Equipment 123.88 Service Agreement
23417 Cole-Pamner Instrument Co. 187.32 Lab Supplies
23418 Collins 8 Aikman Flomcoverings, Inc. 2.130.04 Carpet
23419 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 13,900.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants 8 Y2K
23420 Compliance Technology 94.05 Instrument Repair
23421 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 815.78 Electrical Supplies
23422 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 274.95 Plumbing Supplies
23423 Continental Network Services 1,821.70 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
23424 Controlco 588.84 Electrical Supplies
23425 Converse Consultants 1.331.00 Consulting Service 3-38-3
23426 Cooper Energy Services 1,815.87 Engine Supplies
23427 Core Laboratories, Inc. 600.00 Lab Testing
23428 Corporate Express 1,750.00 Office Supplies
23429 County Wholesale Electric Co. 9,300.93 Electrical Supplies
23430 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 1111199 to 11115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23431 Cydus Envirosystems,Inc. 19.991.40 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
23432 Cytec Industries 11.891.45 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
23433 CAPPO Conference Registration 175.00 Registration
23434 DataCard Services 160.00 Equipment Maint.
23435 David's Tree Service 6,790.00 Tree Maint.Service
23436 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis
23437 Dexon Computer,Inc. 21,120.00 6 DEC Computer Workstations
23438 Diamond H Recognition 715.82 Employee Service Awards
23439 Diehl,Evans&Co.,L.L.P. 380.00 Seminar Registration
23440 Direct Satellite Services 1,490.00 2 Satellite Dishes
23441 Doubletres Hotel 105.00 Registration
23442 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 331.87 Paint Supplies
23443 DGA Consultants,Inc. 6,948.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
23444 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription
23445 DTSC(Dept.of Toxic Substances Control) 560.00 Hazardous Waste Fee
23446 Employers Group 2,563.00 Membership
23447 Enchanter, Inc. 1,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
23448 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 9,146.92 Consulting Services-FIS Support
23449 Environmental Express 1.646.12 Lab Supplies
23450 Environmental Resources Associates 945.90 Lab Supplies
23451 FedFx Corporation 122.85 Air Freight
23452 Filler Supply Company 527.54 Fillers
23453 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 104.74 Lab Supplies
23454 Flo-Systems, Inc. 14,164.94 Pump Supplies
23455 Fountain Valley Camera 64.68 Photo Supplies
23466 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 128.01 Paint Supplies
23457 Frys Electronics 2,402.67 Computer Supplies
23458 FM International,Inc. 14,200.21 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System
23459 General Electric Supply Company 4,304.33 Electric Parts
23460 Ganahl Lumber Company 82.55 Lumber/Hardware
23461 GarraB-Callshan Company 1,410.99 Chemicals
23462 GTE California 1,371.02 Telephone Services
23463 Gednge Castle 1,060.09 Lab Supplies
23464 Glenn Lukos 8 Associates 6,998.60 Engineering Service 2-41
23465 Government Finance Officers Association 245.90 Publications
23466 WW Grainger, Inc. 264.62 Compressor Supplies
23467 Greseby STI 1.267.81 Engine Supplies
23468 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 232.48 Janitorial Supplies
23469 Chair-Pak, USA 3,000.00 Engineedng Service- CAD Draeing Manual
23470 GBC(General Binding Corp) 712.23 Printing Service
23471 Hach Company 158.77 Lab Supplies
23472 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 1IM199 to 11/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23473 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 307.25 Plumbing Supplies
23474 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 23.44 Truck Supplies
23475 Hewlett-Packard 1,610.87 Lab Supplies
23476 Hilti,Inc. 2,618.02 Tools
23477 Home Depot 626.17 Small Hardware
23478 Hub Auto Supply 0.70 Truck Parts
23479 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 10.761.35 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
23480 StateNet 200.00 Online Service
23481 Information Resources 125.00 Human Resources Service
23482 Interstate Battery Systems 526.84 Batteries
23483 InQ Educational Materials, Inc. 72.05 Training Supplies
23484 Irvine Photo Graphics 34.62 Photographic Services
23485 J&B Auto Parts 151.38 Auto Parts&Supplies
23486 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 3,332.55 Instrument Supplies
23487 J.D.Edwards Ward Solutions Company 6,177.16 Training Expenses
23488 J&A Aerial Lift Service, Inc. 597.71 Equipment Maint.
23489 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 20,320.76 Construction Service-H. B.Contamination Clean Up Efforts
23490 Jay's Catering 2,362.26 Catering Services
23491 Ards Suspension Service 80.00 Truck Repairs
23492 Johnstone Supply 2,441.74 Electrical Supplies
23493 Gerald R.Jones 8,549.54 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99
23494 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 11,042.19 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
23495 Keystone Analine Corporation 4,938.40 Chemical
23496 Industrial Distribution Group 1,638.62 Tools
23497 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 23.55 Safety Supplies
23498 Lab Support 3,303.38 Temporary Employment Services
23499 La Motte Chemical Products 121.54 Sulfide Test Ka
23500 Lexis-Nexis 349.10 Books&Publications
23501 Liebert,Cassidy 8 Frierson 4,740.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
23502 The Light House 49.88 Electrical Supplies
23503 Line-X Protective Coatings 512.38 Truck Supplies
23504 Lucci's 95.00 Meeting Expense
23505 Maintenance Technology Corp. 318.55 Welding Supplies
23506 MarVac Electronics 305.23 Instrument Supplies
23507 MasTec Network Services 10.714.37 Communication Equipment-Plant 2 Warehouse
235DB McKinley Transport LTD. 457.69 Freight
23509 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2.280.18 Tools
23510 Mission Uniform Service 3,697.68 Uniform Rentals
23511 Mitchell Instrument Co. 476.00 Instruments
23512 MotoPhoto 121.22 Photographic Services
23513 National Plant Services,Inc. 22,035.86 Vacuum Truck Services
23514 Neat Supply Co. 124.03 Plumbing Supplies
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 11/1199 to 11/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23515 Nicholas Chevrolet 23.96 Truck Repairs
23518 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,687.92 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
23517 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 6,926.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
23518 Northern Hydraulics,Inc. 12.194.41 Electrical Supplies
23519 Offce Depot Business Services Div. 1.183.91 Office Supplies
23620 Orange County Forum 35.00 Registration
23621 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 435.51 Electrical Supplies
23522 Osage Systems Group 500.00 Computer Software
23523 Oxygen Service Company 1,260.32 Specialty Gases
23524 DAG 2,030.00 Government Exlranet Service
23525 OCB Reprographics 1,359.02 Printing Service-Spec P-173
23526 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 75.34 Electrical Supplies
23627 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
23528 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,967.09 Plumbing Supplies
23529 Pacificare of Ca. 1,566.84 Health Insurance Premium
23530 Panametrics 12,586.37 Lab Supplies
23531 Pads Unlimited 171.78 Truck Supplies
23532 Peak Technologies 399.52 Lab Supplies
23533 Peter M.Sandman, Ph.D. 20,000.00 Professional Service-Communication Seminar
23534 Polydyne,Inc. 19,825.37 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
23535 Power Electra Supply Co., Inc. 44.12 Electrical Supplies
23636 Primary Source 515.65 Office Furniture
23537 O Air-Calif. Div. Pump Engineering 61.89 Pump Supplies
23538 R.S.Means Company,Inc. 98.05 Publication
23539 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
23540 Regents of University of California 1,445.00 Registration
23541 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 834.76 Auto Repair
23642 Safety-Kleen 5,583.37 Service Agreement
23543 Safetycere Inc. 210.11 Safety Supplies
23644 Santa Ana Electric Motors 1.308.90 Motor Repair
23545 Schwing America, Inc. 992.33 Pump Supplies
23546 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 419.06 Specialty Gases
23547 See-Bird Electronic, Inc. 1,269.15 Lab Repairs
23548 Second-Sun 501.75 Light Fixtures
23649 Shepard Machinery 207.02 Tools
23550 Sigma Chemical Co. 3,632.36 Lab Supplies
23551 Snap On Industrial 3,167.86 Tools
23552 SoftChoice 12,523.79 Software
23553 Sopp Chevrolet 23,377.77 1999 Chevrolet 3500 Utility Truck
23554 Southern California Edison 6,491.42 Power
23556 Southern Califomia Water 109.40 Water Use
23556 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co., Inc. 671.67 Pump Supplies
Page 6 of
Claims Paid From 11/1199 to 11115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23557 Steel Structures Technology Center, Inc. 640.DD Registration
23558 StudioVisia 15.120.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint.
23559 Summit Steel 49.51 Metal
23560 Sunset Ford 282.79 Truck Supplies
23561 Sunset Industrial Parts 251.29 Mechanical Supplies
23562 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
23563 By Nielson Service, Inc. 816.00 Lab Calibration Service
23564 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1.070.92 Electric Cart Parts
23565 The Meniwood Corporation 3,047.05 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
23566 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.264.02 Mechanical Supplies
23567 Time Motion Tools 45.67 Tools
23568 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
23569 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 32.33 Locks&Keys
23570 Tomell&Cotten 598.10 Legal Services-Burge Claim
23571 Toshiba International Corporation 140.23 Electrical Supplies
23572 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 17.19 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
23673 Transcat 8,371.14 Electrical Supplies
23574 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 367.15 Truck Supplies
23575 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 762.59 Truck Supplies
23576 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 528.00 Lab Services
23577 Tule Ranch/Magan farms 17,110.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23578 Two Wheels One Planet 178.67 Bicycle Supplies
23579 TDI-Brooks International 11,550.00 Lab Supplies
23580 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262,75 Filters
23681 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
23582 Ultra Scientific 527.40 Lab Supplies
23583 United Parcel Service 41.21 Parcel Services
23584 Valley Cities Supply Company 1.407.44 Plumbing Supplies
23585 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 6,000.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
23586 Vortex Industries, Inc. 450.D0 Door Repair
23587 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,155.19 Lab Supplies
23688 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,512.56 Security Guards
23589 Water Policy Report 625.00 Publication
23590 Wayne Electric Co. 577.79 Electrical Supplies
23591 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 60.47 Electrical Supplies
23592 Western City 63.00 Subscription
23583 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 15.330.71 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
23594 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 6.333.85 Instrument Supplies
23595 Xerox Corporation 11,555.48 Copier Leases
23596 YCA&Associates 745.00 Registration
23597 3T Equipment Company 3,473.15 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23598 Advance Constructors, Inc. 8.451.50 Construction 541-1
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 11/1199 to 11115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23599 CNA Trust 938.50 Construction 541-1
23600 Blake Anderson 474.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23801 Barbara A.Collins 364.26 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23602 Mark A, Esquer 907.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23603 Michelle R.Hetherington 1.143.50 Meelingri mining Expense Reimb.
23604 David A. Ludwin 974.60 Meelifitimining Expense Reimb.
23605 Donald F.McIntyre 2.610.34 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23606 Patrick B.Miles 2,672.73 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimb.
23607 Robert Ooten 3.372.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23508 Frank R. Steiger 1.005.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23609 Douglas M.Stewart 779.78 Meetingri'mming Expense Reimb.
23610 Michelle Tuchman 996.50 Meetingrimming Expense Reimb.
23611 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1.170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23612 Mary Sue Thompson and Gateway 1,774.65 Employee Computer Loan Program
23613 Orange County Sanitation District 16.951.17 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
23614 Orange County Sanitation District 1.751.84 Petty Cash Reimb.
23615 Gary L.Welman 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
23616 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,435,166.13
Payroll Disbursements
16218-16233 Employee Paychecks $ 6,643.63 Termination 8 Adjustment
16234-17027 Employee Paychecks 166,308.84 Biweekly Payroll 11/3199
43033-43476 Direct Deposit Statements 676,170.00 Biweekly Payroll 11/3/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 849.120.47
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,674.46 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 211,559.19 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 180,545.33 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 541,778.98
Total Claims Paid 11/1/99-11/16199 $ 4.826.065.58
Page 8 of 8
Claims Paid From 11116/99 to 11131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
23617 Orange County Sanitation District $ 416,271.09 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
23618 Southern California Edison 30,724.64 Power
23619 American Express 8,516.95 Purchasing Card Program
23620 American Management Association 200.00 Membership
23621 ASS Group Inc. 95.00 Publication
23622 Voided Check - -
23623 ASCE Continuing Education 6,385.00 Registration
23624 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 145.24 Telephone Service
23625 AT&T Wireless Service 190.08 Cellular Telephone Service
23626 Burlington Northern&Santa Fe Railway Co. 2,532.18 Pipe Line License Agreement 3-38-1
23627 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
23626 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
23629 City of Cypress 3.212.55 Manhole Repair
23630 City of Fountain Valley 15.647.28 Water Use
23631 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
23632 CompEd Solutions 308.00 Registration
23633 Creative Power Management 7.700.00 Consulting Service-66kV Substation
23634 CAPPO Conference Registration 75.00 Registration
23635 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 1,138.93 3 Dell 4GB Hard Drives
23636 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
23637 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
23638 Flo-Systems,Inc. 235.69 Pump Supplies
23639 Friend ofthe Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
23640 GTE California 6,976.40 Telephone Services
23641 Global Knowledge 1,095.00 Registration
23642 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 75A3 Plumbing Supplies
23643 Home Depot 229.31 Small Hardware
23644 Howard Ridley Company 11,295.00 Electrical Supplies
23645 HR Press 33.00 Training Supplies
23646 Industrial Air Compressor 3,561.57 Equipment Rental
23647 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,116.18 Dues Deduction
23648 Irvine Ranch Water District 20.08 Water Use
23649 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 14.412.21 Safety Supplies
23650 ISA Orange County Section 40.00 Registration
23651 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,583.16 Tools
23652 National Safety CncllWestem Region 542.16 Publication
23653 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
23654 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
23655 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1.101.83 Fittings
23666 OC-American Society for Training&Development 20.00 Membership
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From 11116199 to 11131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23657 OCEA 620.43 Dues Deduction
23658 Pacific Bell 1,035.04 Telephone Services
23659 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
23660 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
23661 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction
23662 Professional Procurement Seminars 300.00 Training Registration
23663 Ouickstart Technologies 3,400.00 Training Registration
23664 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,510.51 TooleMardware
23665 Snap-On Tools 1,578.31 Tools
23666 Snap-On Tools 3,380.68 Tools
23667 So.Cal.Gas Company 18,810.35 Natural Gas
23668 State of California 132.78 Wage Garnishment
23669 Summit Steel 1,472.55 Metal
23670 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 32.66 Mechanical Supplies
23671 Trenchless Technology 600.00 Seminar Registration
23672 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
23673 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1,326.25 Lab Supplies
23674 WEF Membership 225.00 Membership
23675 YCA&Associates 745.00 Registration
23676 James P. Benzie 575.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23677 Kelly J.Christensen 161.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23678 Adrian Renewu 577.30 Mesting/Training Expense Reimb.
23679 Mahin Talebi 511.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23680 Michael I.Zedek 618.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23681 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 111,205.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
23662 Blue Cross of California 171.511.52 Medical Insurance Premium
23663 Commercial Resources Tax Group 250,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin.
23684 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 53.250.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K
23665 Delta Dental 41,647.47 Dental Insurance Plan
23686 DDB Engineering, Inc. 34,859.49 Temporary Employment Services
23687 Environmental Data Solutions Grps,L.L.0 25,920.00 Professional Services-Air Duality Info.Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project
23688 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,389.05 Medical Insurance Premium
23689 Mac Analytical System 32,647.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
23690 National Plant Services, Inc. 59,725.00 Vacuum Truck Services
23691 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 36.347.20 Lubrimnt/Diesel Fuel
23692 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 69.048.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23693 Primary Source 37.356.79 Office Furniture
23694 Projects Partners 36.850.91 Temporary Employment Services
23695 Sanwn Engineering,Inc. 195,000.00 Construction-Coast Trunk Siphon
23696 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 59.145.69 Oman Monitoring MO 6-8-94
23697 Taylor-Dunn 25.268.04 Electric Cart Parts
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From 11/16/99 to 11/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23698 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 34,696.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23699 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 852,294.36 Standby Engine Generators J-33-1
23700 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 53,267.22 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
23701 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 101.319.61 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
23702 Ark Construction Company 28,193.76 Construction PI44-4
23703 S.S. Mechanical Corporation 99,366.63 Construction P146-2
23704 Southern Contracting Company 337,644.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
23705 A-Plus Systems 588.00 Notices&Ads
23706 Great American Printing Co. 172.87 Office Supplies
23707 Advanced Cooling Technologies 535.00 Electrical Testing Service-Gas Dryers#1 
23706 Aeam Company 402.00 Safety Supplies
23709 Air Cold Supply 38.79 Air Conditioner Repairs
23710 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies
23711 Airborne Express 79.75 Air Freight
23712 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 410.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
23713 Appleone Employment Service 7,560.56 Temporary Employment Services
23714 Applied Industrial Technology 490.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies
23715 Arcus Data Security 100.80 O6site Back-Up Tape Storage
23716 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 507.00 Vacuum Truck Services
23717 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 1,265.08 Waste Removal
23718 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal
23719 Atlantis Pool Care 250.05 Service Agreement
23720 Awards&Trophies By Bea 91.77 Plaques
23721 AT&T Wireless Services 720.52 Cellular Telephone Service
23722 Boyle Engineering Corporation 12,135.47 Engineering Services 3-38-1 &7-7-1
23723 Bristol Systems,Inc. 8,555.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
23724 Brown&Caldwell 7.924.76 Engineering Service J-35-1
23725 Bush&Associates, Inc. 3,095.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
23726 C&H Distributions 287.96 Lab Supplies
23727 Cal-Glass, Inc. 200.42 Lab Equipment Service
23726 California Auto Collision 616.39 Tmdc Repair
23729 California Relocation Services,Inc. 675.00 Moving Services
23730 CalTrans 24.00 Publication
23731 Canus Corporation 16.230.99 Fiber Optic Cable
23732 Carton V. Philips,Jr. 135.00 Legal Service-Porter Plating
23733 Carollo Engineers 10,979.87 Engineering Services-P143,P2-50&J-59
23734 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 6,385.90 Office Furniture
23735 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,169.43 Instrument Parts
23736 Compressor Components Of California 2,586.00 Pump Supplies
23737 Consolidated Elect Distributors, Inc. 4.348.91 Electrical Supplies
23738 Continental Exhibitions,Inc. 2.612.50 Registration
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 11/16199 to 11131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23739 Confinental-McLaughlin 253.83 Hardware
23740 Converse Consultants 667.00 Consulting Services-P2-65
23741 Cooper Energy Services 1.654.21 Engine Supplies
23742 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
23743 Cost Containment Solutions 1,805.83 Worker's Comp.Services
23744 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 172.80 Truck Parts
23745 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 150.73 Communication Equipment Repair
23746 County Of Orange 6,300.00 Manhole Repair
23747 County Wholesale Electric Co. 47.35 Electrical Supplies
23748 Crane America Services, Inc. 15.228.48 Office Supplies
23749 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 1.132.70 Lab Supplies
23750 CR&R. Inc. 1,565.00 Container Rentals
23751 CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership
23752 Daily Pilot 268.75 Notices 8 Ads
23753 Dart Controls, Inc. 1.954.62 Instrument Supplies
23764 David R.Woodruff,Ag Consultant 1,020.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Sites Soil Sampling 8 Analysis
23755 Del Mar Analytical 1.220.00 Biosolids Analysis
23756 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 96.98 Lab Supplies
23757 DeZunk C/O Misco/SouthWest 1.267.14 Valves
23758 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 96.76 Paint Supplies
23759 DGA Consultants, Inc. 8,616.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
23760 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 75.00 Medical Screening
23761 Electra-Bond 1,777.88 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
23762 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
23763 Executive Software 3.771.25 Software Maim.Agreement
23764 FedEx Corporation 83.32 Air Freight
23765 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 4.356.27 Plumbing Supplies
23766 Fibertron 1,073.73 Fiber Optic Cable
23767 Filter Supply Company 287.55 Fifters
23768 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
23769 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 349.84 Lab Supplies
23770 Flo-Systems,Inc. 103.05 Freight
23771 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,005.66 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
23772 Fountain Valley Camera 51.77 Photo Supplies
23773 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 156.57 Paint Supplies
23774 Fry's Electronics 654.40 Computer Supplies
23775 General Electric Supply Company 2,766.94 Electric Parts
23776 Ganahl Lumber Company 148.27 Lumber/Hardware
23777 Garraft-Callahan Company 728.39 Chemicals
23778 GTE California 83.50 Telephone Services
23779 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 4.784.52 Belt,Filter Press Supplies
Page 4 of 8
e,
Claims Paid From 11116199 to 11/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23780 Global Knowledge 1,095.00 Registration
23781 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
23782 WW Grainger,Inc. 55.66 Compressor Supplies
23783 Graphic Intelligence Agency, Inc. 435.75 Registration
23784 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 6,952.07 Plumbing Supplies
23785 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 2,669.00 Truck Supplies
23786 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 275.80 Catering Services
23787 Hilti,Inc. 132.96 Tools
23788 HlTech Services 980.00 Primary Clarifier Video Inspection
23789 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 5,380.26 Compressor Parts
23790 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 18,806.73 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning
23791 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium
23792 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 24,259.97 Engineering Services 241
23793 Home Depot 368.82 Small Hardware
23794 Hydrotex 1,768.79 Lube Oil
23795 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1.813.49 Office Supplies
23796 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 75.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23797 Information Resources 325.00 Human Resources Service
23788 Receiver General for Canada-NRC 2,012.90 Lab Supplies
23799 Intergraph Corporation 13,880.35 Software Maint.Agreement
23800 Interstate Battery Systems 658.78 Batteries
23801 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade
23802 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1,968.12 Instrument Supplies
23803 J&A Aerial Lift Service,Inc. 157.50 Equipment Maint.
23804 James Martin&Co. 6,370.00 Professional Services-Data Warehouse Application
23805 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 11.698.23 Misc.Construction Services
23806 Jay's Catering 675.77 Catering Services
23807 Jim's Suspension Service 50.00 Truck Repairs
23808 Johnstone Supply 146A8 Electrical Supplies
23809 JLM Contracting 16.063.85 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair
23810 JPR Systems,Inc. 3.062.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23811 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 7.350.00 Engineering Services 2-41
23812 Kelly Paper 13.45 Paper
23813 Industrial Distribution Group 842.93 Tools
23614 Lab Support 8,696.91 Temporary Employment Services
23815 LaserAll Corporation 8.844.12 Printer Service Agreement
23816 Lee&Ro,Inc. 14,408.23 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12.8-94
23817 Lexis-Nexis 367.50 Books&Publications
23818 Gerald R.Jones 4,321.10 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
23819 Maintenance Technology Corp. 350.53 Welding Supplies
23820 MarVac Electronics 09.78 Instrument Supplies
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 11116199 to 11131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23521 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 813.26 Tools
23822 Mid Cities Honda 807.05 Portable Generator
23823 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 7.564.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
23824 Mission Uniform Service 3.718.23 Uniform Rentals
23825 Mitchell Instrument Co. 97.00 Instruments
23826 Moffatt 8 Nichol Engineers 4,040.07 Engineering Service 5-41-1
23827 National Micr000mp Services 2,045.D0 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
23828 Netsol/Network Solution 1,M5.00 Engineering Services-VoicelDato Cable Upgrade
23829 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,511.50 Office Supplies
23830 Opfio Software 1.600.00 Software Modification
23831 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 17.54 Plumbing Supplies
23832 Oxygen Service Company 1,441.36 Specialty Gases
23833 OCB Reprographics 11.05 Pnnfing Service-Spec P-173
23834 On-Line Electronics, Inc. 373.51 Electrical Supplies
23835 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 49.78 Electrical Supplies
23836 Pacific Bell 54.88 Telephone Services
23037 Pacific Mechanical Supply 355.79 Plumbing Supplies
23838 Pagenet 1.768.06 Rental Equipment
23839 Pallets B Accessones 3,335.94 Pallets
23840 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 1,471.46 Engineering Services J-42
23841 Parts Unlimited 175.51 Truck Supplies
23842 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 162.03 Filters
23843 PetroOuip 59.40 Lab Supplies
23844 Polydyne,Inc. 13,190.74 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
23845 Port Supply 255.98 Rope
23846 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 83.39 Electrical Supplies
23847 Precision Industries 20.26 Mechanical Supplies
23848 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
23849 Primavera 10.154.21 Software
23850 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 11.612.88 Temporary Employment Services
23851 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 159.01 Mechanical Supplies
23652 PCS Express 271.55 Courier Service
23853 Professionals In Human Resources Assoc. 90.00 Membership
23864 Quanta"Environmental Services 950.00 Analytical Service
23855 R. L.Abbott 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
23856 Resume Systems Corporation 6,000.00 Professional Service-V2K Testing Procedures
23867 Reish Marine Studies,Inc. 1,240.00 Ocean Monitoring
23858 Reliastar 7,712.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
23859 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,606.36 Life Insurance Premium
23860 Rockwell Engineering 8 Equipment Co. 4,824.97 Pump Supplies
23561 Rotor Rooter-N.O.C.#11 625.00 Video Tape Hunt.State Beach Sewer Lines
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 11/16/99 to 11131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23862 RPM Electric Motors 260.93 Electric Motor Repair
23863 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 168.62 Mechanical Supplies
23684 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1.691.04 Specialty Gases
23865 Seagate Software 850.00 Registration
23866 Seawsual Consulting,Inc. 3.610.00 Professional Services-Ocean Oudall Instrumentation
23867 Sensorex 273.01 Instrument Supplies
23868 Sheppard, Mullin.Richter&Hampton 10.00 Registration
23869 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.198.05 Tools/Hardware
23870 Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. 14,782.50 Air Conditioner Automation System
23871 Supelco,Inc. 2,342.68 Lab Supplies
23872 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration
23873 Society for Human Resource Management 160.00 Membership
23874 SoftMew Computer Products 653.45 Computer Supplies
23875 Southern California Edison 15.000.48 Parer
23876 Southwest Scientific,Inc. 1,318.91 Instrument Supplies
23877 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
23878 Summit Steel 113.77 Metal
23879 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
23880 Sunset Industrial Parts 595.30 Mechanical Supplies
23881 Super Ice Corporation 126.59 Lab Supplies
23882 Swains Electric Motor Service 213.88 Motor Repair
23803 Solar Turbines,Inc. 623.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23884 The Merhvood Corporation 9.403.20 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
23885 The Orange County Register 3.132.00 Notices&Ads
23886 Third Wave 5,502.60 Professional Services-Document Management Project
23887 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 450.00 Biosolids Analysis
23888 Titan Power,Inc. 409.75 Gas Compressor Maint.
23869 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 102.95 Locks&Keys
23890 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 3.800.00 Water Truck Rental
23891 Transcat 5,402.08 Electrical Supplies
23892 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 5.82 Truk Supplies
23893 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 530.00 Lab Services
23894 TDI-Brooks International 22,750.00 Lab Supplies
23895 Teksystems 9,575.00 Temporary Employment Services
23898 United Parcel Service 494.41 Parcel Services
23897 Unocal Corporation 13.06 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1
23898 US Commposting Council 250.00 Membership
23899 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,570.71 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
23900 Valley Ciites Supply Company 119.06 Plumbing Supplies
23901 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 18,608.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
23902 Vapex, Inc. 1,209.00 Pump Supplies
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 11116199 to 11131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23903 Village Nurseries 64.84 Landscaping Supplies
23904 Vision Service Plan{CA) 7.373.18 Vision Service Premium
23905 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,887.62 Lab Supplies
23906 Wayne Electric Co. 190.08 Electrical Supplies
23907 Weather Services International 3,459.00 Software Maint.-Weather for Windows
23908 Western States Chemical, Inc. 17,552.07 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
23909 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 1,998.07 Instrument Supplies
23910 Xerox Corporation 2,781.42 Copier Leases
23911 Yokogawa Corp.of America 285.78 Instrument Supplies
23912 Dawn M.McKinley 318.14 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23913 Henry R.Salgado 820.15 MeetingRraining Expense Reimb.
23914 Use L.Tomko 612.52 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb.
23915 Yu-Li Tsai 859.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23916 Allied5ignal Substrate Technology 17,653.38 Lab Services
23917 Orange County Sanitarian District 1,483.90 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,006,629.41
Payroll Disbursements
16234-16372 Employee Paychecks $ 175,679.00 Biweekly Payroll 11/17/99
43477-43922 Direct Deposit Statements 666,605.40 Biweekly Payroll 11/17/99
Total Payroll Disbursements 4F 842.284.40
Total Claims Paid 11116199.11/31/99 $ 4,848,913.81
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS McMngDate ronsae.
2 15199
AGENDA REPORT em NumEv Item Numbe
9
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Terri Josway, Safety and Emergency Response Manager
Simon Watson, Acting Maintenance Manager
SUBJECT: Development of Hazardous Energy Control Safety Procedures.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Consultant Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group,
Inc. for the development of 8,000 Hazardous Energy Control Procedures to be
completed by December 31, 2003 and for an amount not to exceed $325,864.
SUMMARY
There are approximately 10,000 pieces of equipment in the plants and pump stations
identified that could cause serious injury or death if improperly isolated from the energy
source. For this reason, a critical component of all work activities for the Operations
and Maintenance Department and the Engineering Department is following safe work
practices. In particular, the safe work practices include the control of hazardous energy
or what is commonly called Lockout/Tagout. There are 8 types of hazardous energy
that may be encountered at the District. The types of energy include electrical,
mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, gravity, thermal, chemical, and radiation. Hazardous
energy control procedures are necessary to ensure employees and contractors avoid
injuries that may result from the unexpected or uncontrolled startup of equipment. Both
federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations require that
equipment-specific energy control procedures be developed and utilized by employers
to properly protect employees and contractors. Basically, our challenge is to establish
procedures and protocol for thousands of devices regarding how we lock them out to
avoid accidental start-up and how we lag them so other workers know what equipment
or process is locked out, who locked it out, and when will the lockout end. This has to
be done every time a hazardous piece of equipment is approached for maintenance or
modification.
The procedure development process was started during FY 1997-98 and work
continued through FY 1998-99. The District has expended a total of$200,000 on
consulting services for hazardous energy control procedure development ($100,000
each fiscal year). To date, 2,172 procedures were developed for the Computerized
Maintenance Management System. The cost during the initial phase of the project
included procedure development and the following tasks:
Develop procedure templates and standards (Electrical, Instrumentation, and
Mechanical Maintenance)
• Trained staff in the use of the templates to accurately collect technical
information
• Developed a temporary software database storage system
• Converted 800 existing to be compatible with the new software
• Conducted a pilot program for moving temporarily stored procedures to the
new software
• Revised approximately 1,000 procedures to add data collected in the
Reinvention Automation Project (J-42).
During FY 1999-00, an additional $100,000 was budgeted in the Joint Operating
Budget. It has been determined by Finance that this work should be budgeted from the
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. The $100,000 budgeted in the FY 1999-00 Joint
Operating Budget will not be expended for this work.
With the above issues resolved, there are approximately 8,000 additional hazardous
energy control procedures that need to be developed. Staff recommends awarding a
Consultant Services Agreement to Communications Performance Group, Inc. to
complete the remaining 8,000 procedures. Communications Performance Group, Inc.
was initially awarded the project because of its approach to the project and its cost,
which was approximately 60% lower than the other consultant submitting a proposal (a
third firm was non-responsive). Communications Performance Group, Inc. has an
understanding of the District's processes and facilities, familiarity with the District's staff
and key subject matter experts, and experience performing the development of the
initial 2,172 procedures. The development cost for the remaining 8,000 procedures is
$40.73 per procedure and the total cost to finish the project is $325,864. The project
will be completed over the next three years because the data collection is dependent on
the Reinvention Automation Project (J-42). If possible, the time from will be accelerated
to complete the remaining hazardous energy control procedures and make them
available for the field staff.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Fiscal Year Budget Funds Funds Project
Budgeted Expended Status/Comments
1997-98 Joint $100,000 $100,000 Approximately 650
Operating procedures were
developed. The format
for the templates was
revised; loop tag
numbering was changed;
issues associated
importing the procedures
into the Computerized
Maintenance
Management System
were resolved.
N'wy.M•psrge\9nq ApxW Repxb\1BBBBn,J ApeMa Re�4\1Mhm Bhc
+•'�•� Page 2
Fiscal Year Budget Funds Funds Project
Budgeted Expended Status/Comments
V 1998-99 Joint $100.000 $100,000 Approximately 1,522
Operating procedures were
developed.
1999-00 Joint $100,000 NA It was determined that
Operating this project should be
funded through the CORF
instead of JO because of
the long-term benefits
derived from the work
product. The approved
$100,000 will not be
expended for Hazardous
Energy Control
Procedure Development.
1999-00 Capital $325,864 NA Requesting approval to
Outlay proceed with this project
Revolving
Fund
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: 53240 Joint Operating Budget)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The project was originally budgeted in the Joint Operating Budget. It was determined
that it would be more appropriate to fund this project through the Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund. The project will be phased over the next four years will be completed
by December 2003. The first year of this project (approximately $100,000)will be
funded through the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget for Facilities Engineering
Projects FE-J. (Budget Book Page 126). This project will be budgeted during the next
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget cycle.
H\ey,YjyppMaWmp AWp RI III&N1pm0i Rlpub\IA?'dm BJ¢
RebeC_ \� Page 3
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
January 2, 1990 was the effective date of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Y
Administration standard 29 CFR 1910.147, Control of Hazardous Energy. Prior to that
time, the Occupational Health Administration relied on the General Duty Clause of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act to ensure that employers safeguard their
maintenance and service employees. California Occupational Safety and Health
Administration incorporated the federal requirements into Title 8, §3314 Cleaning,
Repairing, Servicing and Adjusting Prime Movers, Machinery and Equipment. This rule
addresses the practices and procedures that are necessary to disable machinery or
equipment and to prevent the release of potentially hazardous energy while servicing or
maintenance activities are being performed. The procedures are often referred to as
lockout/tagout procedures because of the requirement to isolate the equipment using
locks and tags.
Historically, the District has not sufficiently documented the activities associated with
de-energizing equipment. The quality of training a new employee or transferred
employee received was dependent on the memory of the "experienced" employee. In
1993, the District started to address the issue of developing hazardous energy control
procedures. Initially field staff attempted to document the steps for isolating equipment
but it was recognized that a standard format was needed, and a system had to be
developed to minimize the future administrative efforts necessary to keep the
procedures up to date. The procedures need to be updated whenever process changes
or improvements occur, equipment and loop tag numbering change, and/or experience
from accident investigations. It was determined that a long-term solution would be to
incorporate the procedures into the Computerized Maintenance Management System
so that when a work order is issued for a preventive maintenance task, an associated
lockout/tagout procedure will be printed via the Computerized Maintenance
Management System.
The hazardous energy control project was started during FY1997-98 and continued
through FY 1998-99. This project was identified as a District Critical Goal during FY
1997-98. The development and use of hazardous energy control procedures is a
cornerstone in the Districts safety program. Field staff is potentially exposed to various
types of hazardous energy on a daily basis. With the use of written procedures, proper
lockout/tagout devices, and training, staff can safely accomplish the work activities
necessary to operate the treatment plants and pump stations.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Select another consultant to develop the remaining 8,000 hazardous energy control
procedures. This is not recommended because of the delay in resuming the project
to write the remaining procedures and make them available to staff. This would
cause a delay in providing written procedures that identify safe work practices. When
the project was started in 1997, the selected contractor's cost was 60% lower than
the other contractor that submitted a proposal. The District would continue to be out
""ftlape,Mvl WAp Rep %lMB M♦P.R.�11]BWRm 9..
RM.eB. 1. Page 4
of compliance with Title 8, §3314 for a longer period of time. Staff has been trained
on the current method of data collection and awarding the project to another
V consultant could increase the time and cost to finish the project.
2. Do not continue the development of the hazardous energy control procedures. This
is not recommended because the District would not be in compliance with Title 8,
§3314 and would be subject to citations by the California Occupational Safety and
Health Administration. Since the need to develop and utilize the procedures has
been document, failure to develop hazardous energy control procedures could be
classified as a Willful Violation. A Willful Violation is usually issued when there is
evidence that an employer is aware that an unsafe or hazardous condition existed
and did not make reasonable effort to eliminate the condition. Although there is no
fine or penalty assessed to a public agency for failure to comply, there is a
significant risk that these citations would be used as evidence in civil or criminal
proceedings arising from serious work related injuries or death. Furthermore, there
is the potential for negative publicity in widely read safety and health publications
such as Safety and Health (National Safety Council Journal). If this project is not
completed, the District would not have the written procedures to ensure that staff
follows safe work practices when working on machinery and equipment.
CEOA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
Three hazardous energy control procedures (Lockoutffagout Procedures) are included
as examples of the work that has already been completed. The applicable procedure
would be utilized whenever staff is required to work on this equipment.
TW/tlj
Miwy.EmNpeMY1BPN Agenda Racla11M 2enN Agenda FeyJ 1R Bd¢
p�. 1� Page 5
v
LockouVTagout Procedure Page 1
12/01/1999 9:18
LockouUTagout Procedure Number 1iBSpMp103AB
Lockout/Tagout Procedure for STANDBY PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMP
REQUIRED PESONNEL (to perform lockout(tagout)
Operators 1
Maintenance Technicians)
Others 0
REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
Tags 18
Padlocks 18
The number of tags and padlocks maV vary when group lacks are used.
TYPES OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
Electrical
Mechanical
ChemicaVSludge
Hydraulic
Grady
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel of this shutdown and LOTO
procedure.
SHUTDOWN AND ISOLATION
Shut down, lock, and tag the following equipment in the order listed:
Seq # Isolation Description Loop Tag No LTN Description Location LOTO Req.
1 D"nergize IIBSTUB103AB STANDBY PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMMM405 Y
2 Attempt to start IIBSWTRI03AB STANDBY PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMP N
3 Deenergize IIBSLOS103AB STOP,LOCKOUT Y
0
VERIFICATION IIBSBVI03BE BALL VALVE SIDE OF PRV Y
Verify that the equipment to be worked on is shut down, locked, and tagged by
performing the following. Also verify that stored energy has been released from
the piping system to be worked on.
Seq # Verification Descrpition Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
Work may now be performed on the equipment
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel that the equipment is ready to
be returned to service.
RESTORATION TO SERVICE
As directed, remove locks and tags from the following equipment and return to 'in
service' status:
Seq # Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
1 I lBSBVI03BE BALL VALVE(INLET SIDE OF PRV)
7 11BSLOS103AB STOP,LOCKOUT
8 11BSTU8103AB STANDBY PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMP AAA-405
LockoutITagout Procedure Peg`
12/01/1999 9:18
SIGNOFFS
Notifications have been completed.
ID# Technician Signature—Div.—Date
The system or process is properly shut down, isolated, locked, tagged, and
verified safe for work to begin.
ID# Technician Signature Div. Date
ID# Operator
d
Lockout/Tagout Procedure Page 1
12/O3/1999 9:19
LockoutlTagout Procedure Number 15CRGDR206MB
LOckout(Tagout Procedure for GRINDER,SLUDGE(DIGESTER#12)
REQUIRED PESONNEL(to perform IockouVtagout)
O erators 1
Maintenance Techniciansl
Others 0
REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
Tags 10
Padlocks to
The number of tags and padlocks may vary when 11roup locks are used.
TYPES OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
Electrical
Mechanical
ChemicallSludge
Hydraulic
Gravity
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel of this shutdown and LOTO
procedure.
SHUTDOWN AND ISOLATION
Shut down, lock, and tag the following equipment in the order listed:
Seq # Isolation Description Loop Tag No LTN Description Location LOTO Req.
1 De�ergize 15CSFBK206HAA SLUDGE GRINDER NO.12A(12).D DA440A y
2 Aftempt to start 15CSMfR2D6HAA SLUDGE GRINDER NO.12A(12).D N
3 De-energize 15CSLOS206MM SWITCH,LOS,#12A SLUDGE GRINRCP-12 y
4 Close 15CRPV206HC PLUG VALVE y
5 Close 15CRPV20SHF PLUG VALVE y
VERIF0G�ATION ISCRBV20SHB SLUDGE DRAIN VLV SUCTION SIDE y
Verify that the equipment to be worked on is shut down, locked, and tagged by
performing the following. Also verify that stored energy has been released from
the piping system to be worked on.
Seq # Verification Descrpition Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
Work may now be performed on the equipment
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel that the equipment is ready to
be returned to service.
RESTORATION TO SERVICE
As directed, remove locks and tags from the following equipment and return to 'in
service' status:
Seq # Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
1 15CRBV20SHB SLUDGE DRAIN VLV SUCTION SIDE OF GRINDER#12
2 15CRPV2D6HF PLUG VALVE
3 15CRPV206HC PLUG VALVE
4 15CSLOS206HAA SWITCH,LOS.#I2A SLUDGE GRINDER#12 DIGESTER LCP-12
5 15CSFBK206HAA SLUDGE GRINDER NO.12A(12).DIGESTER NO.12 DA-440A
W
Lockout/Tagout Procedure Page 2
12/Ol/1999 9:18
SIGNOFFS
Notifications have been completed.
ID# Technician Signature—Div.—Date
The system or process is properly shut down, isolated, locked, tagged, and
verified safe for work to begin.
ID# Technician Signature—Div.—Date
ID# Operator
LockoutifTagout Procedure Pap 1
12/01/1999 9:17
Lockout(Tagout Procedure Number 15CRPMP207H
LOckout/Tagout Procedure for #12 HOT WATER RECIRC PUMP
REQUIRED PESONNEL (to perform IockouUtagout)
Operators 1
Maintenance Technicians 1
Others g
REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
Tags 10
Padlocks 10
The number of tags and padlocks may vary when group locks are used.
TYPES OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
Electrical
Mechanics]
Chemical/Sludge
Hydraulic
Gravity
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel of this shutdown and LOTO
procedure. _
SHUTDOWN AND ISOLATION
Shut down, lock, and tag the following equipment in the order listed:
Seq # Isolation Description Loop Tag No LTN Description Location LOTO Req.
1 Deenergize 15CWrUB207H HOT WATER RECIRCULATION PUM91D411 Y
2 Attempt to staid 15CWMTR207H HOT WATER RECIRCULATION PUMP D N
3 De-energize 15CWLOS207H STOP,LOCKOUT y
4 Close 15CRGV207HC GATE VALVE y
5 Close 15CRGLV207H GLOBE VALVE y
VERIFICATION
Verify that the equipment to be worked on is shut down, locked, and tagged by
performing the following. Also verify that stored energy has been released from
the piping system to be worked on.
Seq # Verification Descrpition Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
Work may now be performed on the equipment
NOTIFICATIONS
Notify Operations and all other affected personnel that the equipment is ready to
be returned to service.
RESTORATION TO SERVICE
As directed, remove locks and tags from the following equipment and return to 'in
service' status:
Seq # Loop Tag No LTN Description Location
2 15CRGLV207H GLOBE VALVE
3 15CRGV207HC GATE VALVE
4 15CWLOS207H STOP.LOCKOUT
5 15CWTUB207H HOT WATER RECIRCULATION PUMP DIGESTER NO. 12 DA411
Lockout/Tagout Procedure Page 2
12/01/1999 9:17
SIGNOFFS
Notifications have been completed.
ID# Technician Signature Div. Date
The system or process is properly shut down, isolated, locked, tagged, and
verified safe for work to begin.
ID# Technician Signature—Div.—Date
ID# Operator
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Rd.of Dir.
Wrsiee
AGENDA REPORT Item NumEe Item NumEe
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE PAYMENT AGREEMENT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve and authorize the General Manager to enter into a five-year payment
agreement for Capital Facilities Capacity Charges for Emmanuel House in Santa Ana,
SUMMARY
The recently approved Ordinance No. OCSD-11, adopting capital facilities capacity
charges, provides for a base charge to be collected by the local sewering agency when
building permits are issued. Section 4.2 authorizes the Board of Directors to approve
an installment payment agreement for a period not to exceed five years at an interest
rate not to exceed ten percent per annum. The charges and interest shall constitute a
lien on the property.
Mercy House Transitional Living Centers, Inc., is developing a 21-room residential care
facility in Santa Ana. Because the Sanitation District charges are $10,988.83, the
developer has asked if payments could be made over time.
Staff has contacted the city staff, as well as Director McGuigan from Santa Ana, and
has been encouraged to grant this request. Therefore, staff recommends the Directors
approve a five-year payment agreement and authorize the General Manager to execute
the agreement.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Total capital facilities capacity charges for this facility are $10,988.33.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
v,.m,uwnn eexmzioumm a ro.m..R.w+.�PF�YADF e:
....a: ermve Page 1
R
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
Collect capital facilities capacity charges prior to certificate of occupancy.
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
\MEmWY14.y.EYNnU1V<Yne�BwNd 01ec Rep. PF.,CC ,Agrgx
RM YA09
Page 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MBetlngD� T't8di
21
AGENDA REPORT IMM NuMber term emev
i
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
SUBJECT: SAWPA AGREEMENT FOR DESALTER BRINE CAPACITY RIGHTS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve an agreement with the Santa Ana Regional Watershed Project Authority
(SAWPA) allowing the purchase of two (2) million gallons per day of Treatment and
Disposal Capacity rights at OCSD to be used for desalter brine discharge. Total
amount due to OCSD based on this agreement is $4,493,642.20.
SUMMARY
Since 1972, the District has provided treatment and disposal services for some
"non-reclaimable" wastewater from the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency
(SAWPA). After 24 years, the Agreement was modified in 1996. Among the significant
changes was the ability to purchase capacity in one million gallon per day (MGD)
increments of average flow compared to five MGD of Peak flow capacity. Furthermore,
payment for plant operations and maintenance would be based upon sewage quantity
and strength (vs. quantity only per the original agreement).
Based on the intent of the 1996 agreement, in April of 1999 the Board approved a
recommendation to negotiate a purchase price of two million gallons capacity for
SAWPA-generated desalter brine. During those negotiations, it was agreed by the
agencies' staff that the purchase price should be based on expected flow and estimated
BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) strength for brine waste. To develop the appropriate
BOD and SS concentration estimates, testing was done at the Arlington Desalter. The
testing outcomes, in conjunction with flows, resulted in a cost formula shown in
Paragraph F., Section 1 of the attached agreement. The formula results in a cost of
$2,626,007.60 for one million gallons per day of brine capacity. Note this cost1MGD
reflects a reduced price compared to "full-strength" flows because brine waste
discharge has significantly lower concentrations of BOD and SS than found in typical
industrial or commercial wastewater.
Although the total cost of 2 MGD of brine capacity is calculated at $5,252,015.20,
SAWPA will receive a credit, calculated at $758,373, from a prior capacity purchase that
has gone unused. The credit results in a total agreement cost of$4,493,642.20.
L\%MP AHR SAWPA 12-154x
R"„..,. v Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY '
The total agreement cost of $4,493,642.20 will be paid in full by August 1, 2000 with half
paid within 30 days of the agreement's execution.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVES
No equitable cost-effective alternatives available.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. SAWPA/OCSD Agreement for Purchase Price of Brine Capacity Rights
GM:gm
CAMMP AHR SAW Al2-15 Mc
R—. YA'B9 Page 2
i
AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE PURCHASE PRICE FOR,
AND THE PURCHASE OF, A 2.0 MGD WASTEWATER
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL CAPACITY RIGHT FOR
DESALTER BRINE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this
day of , 1999. by and between:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT,
a public agency, hereinafter referred to as
"OCSD";
AND
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT
AUTHORITY, a joint powers public agency,
hereinafter referred to as "SAWPA".
OCSD and SAWPA are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "Parties".
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to that certain Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Agreement dated July 24, 1996, between the Parties (the "Agreement"), SAWPA
possesses an ultimate Treatment and Disposal Right of 30 MGD (as those terms
are defined in the Agreement), pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms
and conditions specified therein; and
B. Pursuant to the Agreement, SAWPA has exercised its purchase
rights and acquired and presently owns 9 MGD of capacity defined as a
Treatment and Disposal Right; and
C. SAWPA is presently implementing two groundwater desalting
projects, commonly known as the "Chino Desalter" and the "Temescal Desalter,
TLWs :12/I99:11112479/112463 1
which will produce, as a by-product of operation, brine which is proposed to be
treated and disposed of under the terms of this Agreement; and
D. OCSD has expressed a desire to promote, and participate in,
groundwater reclamation in SAWPA's Santa Ana River Interceptor ("SARI")
Service Area. In furtherance of that desire, OCSD has offered to establish a
modified Treatment and Disposal Right Charge for wastewater treatment and
disposal capacity for desalter brine, as an incentive to the implementation of the
above-described desalter projects; and
E. SAWPA has expressed a desire to purchase an initial increment of
wastewater Treatment and Disposal Right capacity of 2.0 MGD for desalter brine;
and
F. OCSD has adopted a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge ("CFCC")
payable by all dischargers into the District's system.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
Section 1: Purchase Price for Brine Capacity. OCSD and SAWPA
hereby acknowledge and agree that SAWPA may, by this Agreement and
hereafter, purchase Treatment and Disposal Rights for the disposal of brine
generated by groundwater reclamation projects within SAWPA's SARI Service
Area, at a price established by the following formula, or as hereafter amended
due to adopted adjustments of the District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charge:
For 1 MGD
Assumptions Unit of Measure One-Time Rate Brine Capacilv
Flow = 1,000,000 Per gallons/day $ 2.39/gpd $2,389,886.55
BOD = 20 mg/L Per pound/day $680.35/#/day $ 113,481.97
SS = 18 mg/L Per pound/day $816.94/#/day $ 122,639.11
$2,626,007.63
TLW:smm:1211/9911124791112463 2
Application of the foregoing formula generates the purchase price of
$2,626,007.63 per each million gallons of capacity.
Section 2: Purchase and Sale of Increment of Capacity. Subject to all
of the terms and conditions of the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Agreement dated July 24, 1996, except as otherwise expressly provided for in
Section 1 herein, OCSD hereby sells, and SAWPA hereby purchases, 2.0 MGD
Treatment and Disposal Right, to be utilized solely for the disposal of brine
generated by the Chino Desalter, the Temescal Desalter, and other groundwater
reclamation projects within SAWPA's SARI Service Area.
Section 3: Purchase Price. The purchase price of the Treatment and
Disposal Right conveyed hereunder shall be $4,493,642.20 ($5,252,015.20
minus $758,373.00 [credit from prior capacity purchase]), based upon the
formula set forth in Section 1 above. One-half of this purchase price
($2,246,821.10) shall be payable in full within thirty (30)days of execution of this
Agreement, with the balance due on or before August 1, 2000.
Section 4: Applicability of 1996 Agreement. OCSD and SAWPA
acknowledge and agree that solely because of the nature of the brine discharge,
its costs of treatment, and the indirect benefits to OCSD, and the residents of
Orange County, a reduced purchase price for Treatment and Disposal Rights is
appropriate. It is the intent of the parties that all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall be applicable to the parties and to the brine discharge from
SAWPA to the OCSD system.
TLWamm921119911124791112463 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
By
Chair, Board of Directors
By
Secretary of the Board of Directors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
Thomas L. Woodruff
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT
AUTHORITY
By
Chairman of the Commission
TLW: M:12/1/99:#112479;112463 4
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Rd.of Mr.
17JISM
AGENDA REPORT item N"nber '�naNin°ef
Orange County Sanitation Distri
FROM: David Lud irector of Engineering
Originator. Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS, EXTENSIONS TO CONTRACT
EXPRIATION DATES, JOB NO. J-73
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve Amendment No.1 to Cooperative Project Contracts CP-9906 (Sunset
Beach Sanitation District), CP-9908 (City of Placentia), and CP-9909 (City of Placentia)
extending the expiration dates for an additional six months; and (2)Authorize the
General Manager to approve one-time extensions of up to six months for Cooperative
Projects Program contract agreements.
SUMMARY
The District implemented the Cooperative Projects Program last year. The program
provides funds to the local agencies for projects reducing or eliminating inflow and
infiltration (W) to the sewer collection system. During the first year, the District required
that the local agencies satisfy several conditions, including the adoption of a grease
ordinance per the Uniform Plumbing Code, to receive funding. These requirements
caused the local agencies unanticipated delays to their projects. Currently, three
program contracts either have expired or will expire prior to the project completion.
The language in the existing contracts does not allow for contract extensions. The
Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee recently reviewed the matter during
its November 9, 1999 meeting. The Committee directed Staff to seek Board approval of
the authority for the General Manager to extend these contracts by up to six months at
his discretion-
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The current program contracts that either have expired or will expire prior to the
project's completion include CP-9906 (Sunset Beach Sanitation District), CP-9908 (City
of Placentia), and CP9909 (City of Placentia), totaling $105,000. Proposed Amendment
No. 1 extends the contract period only and does not change the dollar amounts allowed
by the contract.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Une hem:Section 8, Page 102)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
a..a.n e40aa` Page 1
The contracts are included in the 1999-2000 CORF budget under Job No. J-73. The
total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is $149,990,000 and
will be spent over the next 20 years on projects reducing I&I throughout the District.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This item has been reviewed by the Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee
and is recommended for approval by the Board. The Cooperative Projects Guidance
Review Committee consists of nine members, as follows: District Directors McGuigan,
Ferryman, and Anderson; District General Manager, Don McIntyre, and Engineering
Supervisor, Jim Herberg; Garden Grove City Manager, George Tindall; Huntington
Beach City Administrator, Ray Silver; and Midway City Sanitation District General
Manager, Del Boyer.
The contract terms for all future contracts will be modified to allow for the General
Manager to extend the terms of the Contracts by up to six months. This will allow for
some flexibility of the program and avoid numerous contract extensions requiring Board
action.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not grant the General Manager the ability to extend these contracts. However, these
funds are required to make improvements to reduce I&I throughout the District's service
area. It is likely that these improvements will not be made without this District funding.
CEOA FINDINGS
This action is categorically exempt.
ATTACHMENTS
None
JDH:JB:jak
G:M91obaM9ende Drell ReporlsUoM BoardsU.73 AR 121599.dea
e�om Page 2
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, December 15, 1999-7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has '..
been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion
and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
25. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any:
a. Authorizing consideration of Items 25 (b)(1-2) and (c)(1-3) listed below which arose
subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to
authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2).
b. 1. Verbal report of Staff
2. Adopt a policy for interim acceptance into the District's treatment plants of dry
weather urban run-off.
C. 1. Verbal report of Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Sewer Service User Fee Refunds
re December 8, 1999 meeting.
2. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SEWER SERVICE USER FEE REFUNDS
MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the
draft Ad Hoc Committee re Sewer Service User Fee Refunds Minutes for the
meeting held on December 8, 1999 to be filed
3. Adopt a policy offering refunds to vested property owners not connected to the
sewerage system for sewer service user fees previously paid, plus interest.
WeadMalaTwp.dta�admiMBS%G9T"pplemeM I agerala boiler.doc
1
Draft
MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, December 8, 1999, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on December B, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: Directors Absent:
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Mark A. Murphy
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair
Shawn Boyd
John M. Gullixson STAFF PRESENT:
Shirley McCracken
James W. Silva Don McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human
John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Patrick Miles, Director of Information
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Technology
Don Hughes Mike White, Controller
Ryal Wheeler Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Judy Bucher, Human Resources Analyst
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
r
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 2
December 8, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the November 10, 1999
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair reminded the Directors that the next Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee meeting would be held on February 9, 2000 at 5:00 p.m.
Director Saltarelli then reported that the Ad Hoc Committee re Sewer Service User Fee meeting,
held prior to the FAHR meeting on December 8, 1999,was recommending the Board to consider
adopting a policy offering refunds including interest to the vested property owners not connected
to the sewerage system for sewer service user fees previously paid.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager had no report.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager reported that requests have been received from two developers,
The Irvine Company for the Newport Coast development and Hearthside Homes for the Bolsa
Chica development, to divert dry weather urban runoff. There are public health reasons and
environmental benefits to capture and treat the runoff from these areas but the policy of
accepting dry weather urban runoff must be balanced with the need to maintain the long-term
reliability of the treatment facilities. This issue will be further discussed by the Steering
Committee on December 1Vh.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
The Director of Finance had no report.
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications was not present.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel briefly reported on the OCIP bankruptcy issue and the remaining funds that are to be
distributed.
b
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
December 8, 1999
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-d)
a. FAHR99-91: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
November 1999: The Treasurers Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee
meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in
conformance with the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
b. FAHR99-92: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report.
C. FAHR99-93: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of November 17,
1999.
d. FAHR99-94: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report
for the period July 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 12(a) through (d) under Consent Calendar.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e)
a. FAHR99-95: Consideration of 2000-01 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policies, and
Calendar.
Mike White, Controller, reviewed the proposed budget assumptions, policies and
calendar.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to have this item brought back to the
next meeting of the FAHR Committee.
b. FAHR99-96: Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the
independent audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional
three-year period, for an amount not to exceed $42,600 for FY 99/00, $44,300 for
FY 00/01, and $46,000 for FY 01102.
Following discussion among the Directors, the motion was amended to authorize
staff to solicit bids from certified public accounting firms to include Moreland and
Associates, for a three year period with two one-year extension options at the
District's discretion.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carded to approve amended
recommendation.
C. FAHR99.97: Approve an agreement with California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CalPERS) authorizing actuarial valuation to determine contribution costs
to District if the District were to enter into an agreement with CaIPERS, for an
amount not to exceed $1,400.
1
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 4
December 8, 1999
Directors entered into a discussion on the merits of this valuation. The Directors
agreed that the agreement and report should be handled by General Counsel.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to approve staffs recommendation.
d. FAHR99-98: Receive and file status report on septic tank search, and authorize
FAHR Committee Chair to send follow-up letter.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
e. FAHR99-99: Receive and file Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Final Report
dated December 1999.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
(14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS
a. FAHR99-100: Y2K Year End Project Status Report
Director of Information Technology, Patrick Miles, gave a brief report on the
District's Y2K readiness.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were no supplemental agenda items.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for February 9, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:46 p.m.
Submitted
b
.�/G�
Penny FAHR K e ilt 4secretary
119wp dtaWPnda%FAHRIFehr99LV9minslIO1399 FAHR MIN.&c
lfr
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Togo or .Dir.
t2/is gg
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nymber
Orange County Sanitation District G6f
FROM: David Ludwin irector of Engineering
Originator: Brian Bingman, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: NEW ENGINEERING TRAILER AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-75
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve plans and specifications for the New Engineering Trailer at Plant
No. 1, Jab No. J-75, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a contract to Brandall Modular
Corporation for New Engineering Trailer at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-75, for an
amount not to exceed $228,000.
SUMMARY
This project will provide the following:
• New triple-wide modular office facility including eleven offices, two
cubicles, one photocopier area, and two restrooms.
• All required trenching, piping, wiring, and associated utility work to
provide a complete office facility.
The Engineering Department has increased their number of staff with contract
employees. The contract employees' offices are currently spread-out within the
Administration Building. In several areas, employees are double stacked in
offices due to lack of space. The addition of the Engineering Trailer will allow all
Design Engineering employees to be collocated within the Administration
Building and the new modular office facility. Bringing all the staff together is
necessary for adequate communication and supervision of the staff. The trailer
is to be located adjacent to the Administration Building and behind the Human
Resources Building. The contractor will have 90 calendar days from the date of
the contract approval to complete the construction.
The plans and specifications for Job No. J-75 were completed in October 1999.
In-house staff designed the project. The plans and specifications were bid on
November 9, 1999.
a .W:mm Page 1
l
Project Budget $344,300
Construction Budget $300,000
Engineer's Estimate $300,000
Low Responsible Bid $228,000
High Bid $336,100
Number of Bids 7
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See the attached Budget Information Table. The Board of Directors is being
asked to authorize $228,000 for the construction contract and $16,900 for
construction staff support.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Sedion 8—Page 126—Facilities Eng.)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Strategic Plan recommends many new facilities be designed and
constructed relatively quickly. To help in that effort, nine contract employees
have been retained. The Design Engineering Division does not have enough
office space to seat all of the contract employees. On a temporary basis, office
space was borrowed from Operations and Maintenance and Source Control.
ALTERNATIVES
The only alternative is to leave the contract employees where they are and not
add the new trailer. This alternative is not recommended because there is
insufficient office space for the long-term seating of the contract employees.
Each of the impacted departments needs these borrowed spaces for their
personnel.
CEQA FINDINGS
There are no CEQA requirements for the trailer facility.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Bid Tabulation
BEB:jak
G.WglobaMgenda DraR ReporlsVoiM SoardsV-75 AR 121599=
R—. � Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
NEW ENGINEERING TRAILERS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-75
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ $ $ $ 0%
Design Staff $ 19,100 $ 19,100 $ - $ 19,100 $ 19,100 $ - $ 19,100 $ 1,872 10%
Consultant PSA N/A $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
Construction Contract $ 300,000 $ 300.000 $ 300.000 $ - $ 228,000 $ 228,000 $ 0%
Construction Staff $ 16,900 $ 16,900 $ - $ 16,900 $ - $ 16,900 $ 16,900 0%
Construction Other $ 8,300 $ 8,300 $ - $ 8,300 $ 8,300 $ 8,300 $ 0%
$ $ $ 0%
Contingency $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ 0%
TOTAL $ 344,300 $ 344.300 $ - $ 344.300 $ 27,400 $ 244,900 $ 272.300 $ 1,872 1
h\v oltskogeudgsl Table
Fo m Revisal IVl719a
November9, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDUM 1:
BID TABULATION
NEW ENGINEERING TRAILERS AT PLANT NO. 1
Job No. J-75
Engineers Estimate: $300,000 Construction Contract Budget: $300,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. BRANDALL MODULAR CORPORATION $ 228,000
2. SPACE LEASING COMPANY $ 288,321
3. RESUN LEASING INC. $ 293,849
4. ADAMS/MALLORY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. $ 297.690
5. MOD CRAFT, INC. $ 301,861
6. ATEK CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 333,000
7. PROFILE STRUCTURES, INC. $ 336,100
8. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid
is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to BRANDALL MODULAR
CORPORATION in the bid amount of$22 000 as the lowest and best bid.
J
vid A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
H:1wp.dt3%en91JO8S 8 CONTPACTSU-75-New Design Eng.TrailersW5 Bid Tab.doo
Revised 05119198
OCSD . P.O.Bm 8127 . Founbin Vagey,CA 9272"127 . (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MIM�S OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, November 17, 1999
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 4 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Jim Silva, County Supervisor Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager
Mike Pelerman, Director of Human Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the October 27, 1999 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2
November 17, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager asked Blake Anderson and Tom Woodruff to update the members on the
recent ruling re the Orange County bankruptcy. The District should receive about 95 cents back for
every dollar invested in the pool, and the remaining funds should be available in about four weeks.
Blake Anderson mentioned that there may be a legislative bill introduced by Slate Senator Pulanco on
behalf of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District that would prevent counties from banning
ordinances on biosolids land applications.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that in the Directors Board meeting folders is a memo with
additional information on the bankruptcy. He also discussed several items that are on the Board's
agenda for closed session, as well as recently submitted construction claims.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-B)
A. Recommend adopting a Financial Plan to consolidate bookkeeping and rate-
setting practices for the District as follows:
1. Combine the assets and liabilities for the separate Revenue Areas into
one Revenue Area.
2. Adopt one Financial Plan.
3. Adopt one user fee rate for Revenue Areas 1-13.
4. Continue to fund Revenue Area 14 by contract with the Irvine Ranch
Water District.
The rate consolidation issue was discussed at length. The main concern was
how to address the area formerly known as Revenue Area 7, which is a very old
system and has been identified as needing extensive repaidrehabilitation. IRWD
has expressed an interest in taking over these lines by changing its boundary for
sewering to include this section of Irvine/Tustin, which is already receives water
service from IRWD. The portion in Santa Ana would be included within Santa
Ana's revenue area. The impacts of removing this area from the District service
area on the overall rates in the other revenue areas will be researched and
presented to the Steering Committee at the December Steering Committee
meeting. The issue of of RA 7 reserves would also have to be considered, as well
as considering rate consolidation for all revenue areas except 7 and 14.
B. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the working committees at their
December meetings were reviewed with no changes.
v
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
November 17, 1999
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 15, 1999 at 5 p.m.
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 15, 1999 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened at 5:25 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6, to discuss the issue of succession planning. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file
with the Board Secretary. The minutes of the Joint Board will report on the actions when they
are approved.
At 5:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
j
mitted by:
Tappan
ying Committee Secretary
N Wp GbbpuN TEEM/ COMYIiiEFDW 9011170 SC Mimile+tac
'r
Draft
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1999 - 5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on December 1, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Others Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Dr. Stephen Weisberg
James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Roger D. Griffin
John Collins, Past Board Chair
Jan Debay, Board Chair Staff Present:
Peter Green
Joy Neugebauer Don McIntyre, General Manager
Anna Piercy Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Charles E. Sylvia Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Paul Walker Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Directors Absent: Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Don Bankhead Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist
Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair George Robertson, Senior Scientist
Simon Watson, Acting O&M Maintenance Manager
Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the October 6, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance ,
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
December 1, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair Pat McGuigan reminded the Directors that the committee would be dark in January.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager gave no report
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson reported there was continued interest in dry weather run-off diversion. Inquiries
have been received from the developers of the Boise Chica and Crystal Cove areas. This issue
has been referred to the Steering Committee for further discussion.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Patrick Miles gave no report.
(9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Bob Ooten reported that the Operations and Maintenance Report, which is one of three required
reports by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, was available for review. Information
contained in the report includes the District's history, how the District operates and special
projects currently under process.
(10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Bob Ghirelli reported that the first monthly report of the Technical Services Department was
included with the Directors' agenda package. This report was modeled after the monthly
Operations and Maintenance report.
Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist, briefly updated the Directors on the Kern County biosolids
litigation. The petition challenging the Kern County biosolids ordinance was filed on November
81" in the Kern County Superior Court. A motion to transfer the case out of Kem County will be
heard on December 7' . Kern County's answer to the petition on the California Environmental
Quality Act(CEQA) causes is due on January 27' . District's counsel believes that the case will
be heard starting in late February. Due to swift hearing of CEQA-based lawsuits by the courts,
counsel has recommended against pursuing a temporary restraining order as it may result in a
judge, not knowledgeable in the science supporting biosolids, blemishing the record by rejecting
the restraining order or the stay. Counsel recommends complying with the ordinance under
protest while the court determines if Kern County needs to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report(EIR).
Imperial County is in the process of drafting a biosolids ordinance that will ban all fortes of
biosolids products, including biosolids compost. The Imperial County Environmental Evaluation
Committee will make a determination on the level of CEQA review necessary on December 23r°,
after which public comment will be accepted for 30 days. After the comments are reviewed,
Imperial County will schedule a public hearing on the ordinance before the ordinance is
presented to the Board of Supervisors for adoption.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
December 1, 1999
Currently Kings County does not have direct regulatory authority over the two sites where
biosolids are being land applied. Due to the increase in regulatory activity related to dairy
byproducts, Kings County is in the process of developing an ordinance for the agricultural use of
manure. To be consistent, Kings County wishes to develop an ordinance for biosolids, similar to
that for manure management, that will provide them with local oversight authority. District's staff
will provide technical support to Kings County during this process.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
(12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-c)
a. OMTS99-41: Approve a project to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit, at no
cost to the District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-
01 at an approximate cost of$125,000 contingent upon the achievement
of at least a 4% improvement in cake solids.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
b. OMTS99-42 1) Approve a budget amendment increase of$350,000 for the mechanical
maintenance materials, supplies and services budget from$1,742,000 to
$2,092,000 for the Top-end Overhaul of Four Central Generation
Engines, Specification No. M-063, for a total project budget of$700,000;
2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 3) Award a
contract to Statoil Energy, Inc. for Top-end Overhaul of Central Power
Generation Engines, Specification No. M-063 for a total amount not to
exceed $677,000.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
C. OMTS99-43: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Pickens Fuel
Corporation, providing for payment for the operation of the CNG
Refueling Station, extending the contract period from January 26, 2000 to
June 30, 2000.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
(13) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-d)
a. OMTS99-44 Y2K Year End Project Status Report
Patrick Miles gave a brief update on the District's Y2K testing on various
systems. This project included an update in emergency procedures. On
December 31 at 6:00 p.m., the incident command system will be
activated.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
December 1, 1999
b. OMTS99-45 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project activity update.
Dr. Stephen Weisberg, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water
Research Project(SCCWRP), spoke to the Directors regarding
SCCWRP's activities.
C. OMTS99-46 Offshore Ocean Monitoring Program Update
George Robertson, Senior Scientist, spoke to the Directors regarding the
District's ocean monitoring program. The District is currently having a
toxicity compliance problem and staff believes ammonia is the problem.
Staff is working to resolve this problem.
d. OMTS99-47 Secondary Treatment Operational Plan—Level of Treatment
Bob Dolan reported that the newly adopted Strategic Plan changed the
10-year policy of treating wastewater to a 50/50 primary to secondary
treatment blend. The policy in the Strategic Plan allows the District to
reduce the secondary treatment blend to achieve a balanced
environmental strategy and meet permit limits. A plan has been
developed that would reduce secondary treatment 20 mgd per day initially
and in 10 mgd monthly increments there after while maintaining
compliance with all permit limits. There is a toxicity issue that needs to be
resolved with regulators before the operational plan will be implemented.
Directors entered into discussion and asked questions regarding the
testing methods and how often the testing methods are utilized. Concern
was expressed by the Directors that reducing the treatment in increments
of 10 mgd per month was too much. Quarterly sampling is done for
benthos and water quality is tested on a monthly basis. Directors were
concerned that damage could be done to the environment before test
results were received.
(14) CLOSED SESSION
There was no dosed session.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
December 1, 1999
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
February 2, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
Submitted by:
�CG'G2�
Penny Kyle
Operations, intena and Technical Services
Committee Secretary 6
H:1wp.Na�Benda\OMTS\1999MInUMH060D MNutw,dw
OMTS COMMITTEE MTng Date TOBd ew.
21199wis AGENDA REPORT loam nDmte Item Num
/�.le1 r
OM759441
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance `1-P
Originator: Mark Esquer, O & M Process Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: BELT FILTER PRESS RETROFIT UNIT TRIAL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a project to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit, at no cost to the
District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an approximate cost
of$125,000, contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4-percent improvement in
rake solids.
SUMMARY
The District operates twenty-three belt filter presses, eight at Plant No. 1 and fifteen at
Plant No. 2. The belt presses remove water from anaerobically digested sludge to
produce biosolids. The more water that we successfully remove from the biosolids, the
less tons of biosolids we must haul away. The District produces approximately 190,000
wet tons of biosolids annually, which is hauled and beneficially recycled by application
to agricultural land in the Kem, Riverside and San Diego Counties. The contracted cost
for biosolids management ranges from $25.00 - $25.90 per wet ton and the annual
biosolids management contract budget is approximately $4,850,000. This belt filter
press technology was developed in the mid-1970's. While we have been able to
improve its dewatering performance through operational changes, there is a limit to
what our operators can achieve.
Recognizing this, the original equipment manufacturer, Ashbrook Corporation, has
proposed that the District install and evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit to
enhance the solids content of dewatered biosolids. This unit consists of an additional
four rollers (for a total of twelve) that assist in squeezing more water out of the solids.
The proposal stipulates that the manufacturer will provide and install a retrofit unit on
one of the belt presses for a six-month evaluation period at no cost to the District. The
retrofit would be installed within 30 to 60 days from Notice to Proceed. The District
would agree to purchase the retrofit trial unit at a cost of approximately $125,000 if the
unit is successful in enhancing the solids content by at least 4%.
The current biosolids produced at the District have a total solids content of about 22-
23%. Increasing the solids content by 4% will reduce the current biosolids hauling cast
by approximately $653,200 per year. A capital equipment outlay of$3,450,000 for
twenty-three units, including a 20% contingency, would have a simple payback of 5.3
years.
X'Yg�x GENDlS WWeI,Press ReiMnOWS COMMT£V
e...en RMa„ Page 1
Approximately five years ago, the District had trialed a similar retrofit unit on a pilot
scale. That pilot unit was successful in achieving an increase in solid content by over
4%. However, the design of the retrofit unit required significant expenditures to modify
the belt press structure. The additional expense associated with modifying the structure
and associated belt press equipment made the full-scale application economically
infeasible. The vendor has since redesigned the unit in order to reduce the cost and
required building modifications.
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the new equipment and determine the ultimate
project cost. If this project proves successful, a more comprehensive project may be
proposed to install retrofit units on the 22 remaining belt presses.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The vendor will supply all parts and install the retrofit unit for evaluation purposes at no
cost to the District. With the successful completion of this test, a line item to fund the
procurement of the retrofit unit will be included in the 2000-01 CIP budget.
The belt press retrofit is feasible at this time due to the recent increases in biosolids
disposal costs and the reduction in the retrofit equipment cost.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The purchase of the retrofit unit is not expected to occur during the current fiscal year.
Funding for this project will be proposed for the Year 2000-01 CIP budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Proposal dated August 12, 1999 from the manufacturer's representative.
MAE:ct/pjm
HWq.MeW Wftp..MGENDASMMTSIBO Pre»R.W.1 OMTS GOMMRTEE2d.
R--d WWS Page 2
•
GIERLIC14.NLTCHEtl-INC.
August 12, 1999
Mr, Bob Ooten
C.S.D.O.C.
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Subject: Hi Solids Retrofit for Winklepress
Dear Bob:
Confirming our telephone conversation of 8-10-99, Ashbrook Corporation and Gierlich-
Nlitchell, Inc. would like to offer the Sanitation Districts the following proposal for
evaluation of our M-Solids Retrofit unit for the 8 roll Winklepresses.
Ashbrook Corporation expects at least a 4% point improvement of your solids by using
the Hi-Solids Retrofit.
Ashbrook Corporation has authorized G.MI. to make the following offer to you:
Ashbrook Corporation will supply all the necessary parts along with a factory-
trained serviceman to install the M-Solids Retrofit. This would be on a test basis
at no costs to the Sanitation Districts. We would however, like an agreement that
if after six months of operation, the Hi-Solids Retrofit Kit proves to provide the
additional 4%points Ashbrook guarantees, that the Sanitation Districts agrees to
purchase this Retrofit Kit at the cost of approximately S125,000.00.
If a longer test period would be preferred by the Districts, I am sure this can be worked
out.
If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please give me a call.
Very truly yours.G ����� CHEL/� ✓
I' NLtchell
IM/cm
P.O. Box 933, 227 WEST GRAND AVENGE,EL SEGUNDO. CALIFORNIA 90245 (310) 414-0150 FAX (310) 322-9311
OMTS COMMITTEE Meetlng Dae To ed.or wr.
rzri/ss rz/is/ev
AGENDA REPORT Item Numher Item hum
_ _ onmv9-az
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Simon Watson, Acting O & M Maintenance Manager
SUBJECT: TOP-END OVERHAUL OF CENTRAL GENERATION ENGINES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve a budget amendment increase of$350,000 for the mechanical maintenance
materials, supplies and services budget from $1,742,000 to $2,092,000 for the Top-end
Overhaul of four Central Generation Engines, Specification No. M-063, for a total project
budget of$700,000
2. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation
3. Award a contract to Statoil Energy, Inc. for Top-end Overhaul of Central Power Generation
Engines, Specification No. M-063 for a total amount not to exceed $677,000.
SUMMARY
The District operates and maintains central generation facilities at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2.
There are three internal combustion-driven generators at Plant No. 1 and five at Plant No. 2.
The primary role of the Central Generation plants is to satisfy the requirement for the reliable
supply of electricity for plant equipment. The Central Generation plants are the primary source
of electricity and thermal energy for the treatment plants, while Southern Califomia Edison
provides the backup source. The reliable operation of the Central Generation plants is key to
assuring smooth operation of the process plants and to the prevention of sewage spills.
Various maintenance procedures are routinely scheduled for these large engines. Normally,
top-end overhauls are scheduled to be performed at 25,000 to 30,000 hours of operation. The
major tasks of a top-end overhaul include: removing, completely rebuilding and reinstalling all
cylinder heads; inspecting and taking measurements of all cylinder liners, pistons and bearings;
and replacing various gaskets, hoses and seals. District and vendor staff inspected the engines
at 25,000 hours of operation and determined that the top-end overhaul procedure could be
delayed until the equipment had 40,000 hours of operation. The four engines that are
recommended for overhaul are either now approaching or have exceeded 40,000 hours.
This project was budgeted for$350,000 as part of the Mechanical Maintenance $1.748,100
Materials, Supplies and Services budget. The $350,000 estimate was based on quotes from
two local suppliers, Thomason Mechanical and Cooper Energy Services. The budget number
was not based on a detailed specification. Staff reviewed the 25,000 hour inspection report,
routine scheduled inspections, and information gathered from other agencies that have similar
engines and have completed "top-end overhauls", and decided to write a detailed specification.
The detailed specification included extra work beyond what was budgeted. The items in the
scope of work causing the cost increase include: 1) Two District employees will not assist with
the overhaul, allowing the employees to continue working on core business and not have an
impact on the vendor performing the work; 2) Parts that are not normally replaced in the engine
Page 1
heads will be replaced based on the inspection reports; and 3) Requirement for minimum
experience for performing top-end overhauls on Cooper LSVB engines. The detailed scope of
work was written to provide a "tum-key" overhaul project that still maintains or improves the
current engine reliability and reduces the chance of unforeseen cost additions that other
agencies have experienced associated with this type of work.
The bid process resulted in the receipt of four bids from the following vendors:
Exline, Inc $1,019,342.00
Cooper Energy Services $ 759,344.00
Thomasom Mechanical Corp.$ 732,000.00
Statoil Energy, Inc. $ 677,000.00
The project is scheduled to require about four months to complete or one engine per month.
Staff has cleared this project with all affected field staff.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff recommends awarding a contract to Statoil, Inc. for the top-end overhaul of four Central
Power Generation engines plus a $23,000 contingency for a total amount not to exceed $700,000.
In addition, staff requests a budget amendment increase for the Mechanical Maintenance
Materials, Services and Supplies budget from $1,748,000 to$2,098,000 for the top,-end
overhaul of four Central Power Generation engines.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The additional $350,000 for the project will come from funds not spent in the current Joint
Operating Budget. If the remaining Joint Operating funds are not adequate to cover the cost,
District reserves will be used.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Bid Tabulation
SW:pjm
H:Wip.dtaWmWlO agnanteOWS COMMITTEEIO&M Agenda Reporls\199M120199 Topend Overhaul of Cancan Eigines.doc
Page 2
BID PRICE TABULATION
TOP END OVERHAUL OF CENTRAL GENERATION ENGINES
SPECIFICATION NO. M-063
Bid Opening: November 4, 1999
1. BIDDER: EXLINE, INC.
Totals
Plant 1: Top end overhaul of each 12 cylinder Total Plant 1:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 12-SGC engine No. 2
and 3 $444,188.00
Plant 2: Top end overhaul of each 16 cylinder Total Plant 2:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 16-SGC engine No. 3
and 5 $574,145.00
Total Lump Sum
for four (4) engines, in accordance with Attachment A, Scope of Work $1,019,342.00
2. BIDDER: THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP.
Totals
Plant 1: Top end overhaul of each 12 cylinder Total Plant 1:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 12-SGC engine No. 2
and 3 $320,000.00
Plant 2: Top end overhaul of each 16 cylinder Total Plant 2:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 16-SGC engine No. 3
and 5 $412,000.00
Total Lump Sum
for four(4) engines, in accordance with Attachment A, Scope of Work $ 732,000.00
3. BIDDER: COOPER ENERGY SERVICES
Totals
Plant 1: Top end overhaul of each 12 cylinder Total Plant 1:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 12-SGC engine No. 2
and 3 $333,410.00
Plant 2: Top end overhaul of each 16 cylinder Total Plant 2:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 16-SGC engine No. 3
and 5 $425,934.00
Total Lump Sum
for four(4) engines, in accordance with Attachment A, Scope of Work $ 759,344.00
4. BIDDER: STATOIL ENERGY/PAXTON, L.P.
Totals
Plant 1: Top end overhaul of each 12 cylinder Total Plant 1:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 12-SGC engine No. 2
and 3 $317,000.00
Plant 2: Top end overhaul of each 16 cylinder Total Plant 2:
Cooper-Bessemer LSVB 16-SGC engine No. 3
and 5 $360 000.00
Total Lump Sum
for four(4) engines, in accordance with Attachment A, Scope of Work $677,000.00
5. BIDDER: MARATHON MARINE - NO RESPONSE
6. BIDDER: DUTHIE POWER SERVICES - NO RESPONSE
\VtppO Ial%. .M vnVWBIWV TERSIBID PRIDE TABULATIONErc
OMTS COMMITTEE Meebrl Dvsoe roBtl.or r.
wu / rJ 9f
AGENDA REPORT Item Nu be ItrYn Numb
orm599-03 i/ /r 1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Oaten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Mark Esquer, Manager, Process Engineering
SUBJECT: PICKENS CONTRACTOR CONTRACT FOR OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) STATIONS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation, providing
for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station, extending the contract
period from January 26, 2000 to June 30, 2000.
SUMMARY
In January 1999, the District entered into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation
for the operation and maintenance of the compressed natural gas fueling station. The
initial contract is for a twelve-month period that expires on January 26, 2000. Due to
construction and implementation delays, Pickens did not assume responsibility for the
operation and maintenance of the station until April 1999. Staff is requesting a contract
extension with Pickens to June 30, 2000 in order to evaluate the operation and
maintenance by the service provider and to assess the proforma analysis of the facility.
An extension would provide time for 0&M to develop a plan for increased use of the
station and would allow a more complete evaluation of the station and possible
altematives.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The present contract, beginning in April 1999, with Pickens for O&M is a monthly
maintenance fee of$900, plus a $0.10 per gallon administrative fee for card
management and billing. These fees are budgeted through the current fiscal year. The
average cost to operate and maintain the facility is approximately $1,100 per month
from April start-up through August 31. The revenue is low because the solids handling
trucks are not currently using the station and the station has not been included in CNG
directories.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: es, Division 410)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
HN OLL`aABSTluM6 SiY93tl!➢G M121ry TMC
R... 1111� Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A primary reason for the construction of the CNG station was OCSD's participation in an
AQMD grant for conversion of biosolids hauling trucks from diesel only to combination
diesel/CNG vehicles. Due to new ownership of the five converted vehicles, the trucks
are not yet purchasing CNG from the District. We are currently working with Pima Gro
to encourage the current owners to operate the vehicles as alternative fuel vehicles.
This will address the environmental goal of the project and also increase the usage of
the CNG station.
ALTERNATIVES
Go out to bid for new contract for operation and maintenance of the station or shut down
the station.
CEQA FINDINGS
NA
ATTACHMENTS
NA
BAC:ct/pjm
H Nw MSwWwIlnskWTS Frssoma m$M 121%.tt me
R..„.e 1111� Page 2
r
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, December 2, 1999, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation
District was held on Thursday, December 2, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present: Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Steve Anderson Bob Ooten, Director of Operations&
John Collins, Past Chair Maintenance
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Russell Patterson John Linder, Construction Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Directors Absent: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
Lynn Daucher Kathy Miles, Project Manager
Christina Shea Chuck Hodge, Project Manager
Jack Mauller Morris Ying, Project Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
OTHERS PRESENT:
Duane Jensen, Carollo Engineers
Jim Burror
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the November 4, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
u
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 2
December 2, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson reported that planning requests have been received
for dry weather urban runoff flow permits, similar to that granted to Huntington Beach. Staff is
developing guidelines and procedures for conditional short-term permits for discussion and
review by the Steering Committee. Staff will include fair share operating costs to be paid by the
applicants.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Director of Engineering reported that November 29 was the closing date for challenges to the
Strategic Plan EIR. No challenges were received.
There are now nine contract employees assisting with the CIP program. New temporary office
facilities have been designed for behind the FIR Building. Director Swan cautioned staff about
potential legal ramifications of hiring temporary employees to work full time. Staff will discuss this
with legal counsel to make sure all releases have been received, and a report will be made to the
Board.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information only item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and
the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%.
(11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT
Information only item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the PSA and Addenda Report. The
format has changed and this will be a monthly report from now on, rather than a quarterly report.
r
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
December 2, 1999
(12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-g)
a. PDC 99-55 Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-44-4 (Rebid), with Ark
Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$56,368, and a
time extension of 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract
amount to $688,400.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the
staff recommendation.
b. PDC 99-56 Approve a budget of$1,113,637 for Orange-Western Subtrunk
Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
C. PDC 99-57 Approve Professional Services Agreement with ADS
Environmental Services for Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Studies, Job
No. J-73-1, for a total amount not to exceed $74,235.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
d. PDC99-58 Approve a budget amendment of$22,405,756 for Area
Classification Studies Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2,
Job No. J-35, for a revised total project cost of$29,620,416.
Staff was requested to bring back a report from Terri Josway,
Safety Manager, and a representative of Legal Counsel to review
the plan for implementing J-35 and to discuss potential interim
risks during the implementation period. Staff was also requested
to investigate the insurance implementations of the project and to
report to the Committee on these topics.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
e. PDC99-59 Approve a sole source equipment purchase for the Grit Auger
Replacement, Job No. J-52.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
f. PDC99-60 (1)Approve plans and specifications for the Outfall Flow Meter
Replacement, Job No. J-66, on file at the offices of the Board
Secretary; (2)Authorize the General Manager to set January 11.
2000, at 11:00 a.m., for bid opening; (3) Authorize the Director of
Engineering to publish the Notice Inviting Bids; and (4) Approve a
budget amendment of$200,000 for a total project budget of
$1,124,000.
PDC Committee Minutes ,
Page 4
December 2, 1999
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duty carried to recommend
approval.
g. PDC99-61 Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and
Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, providing for additional
engineering services in the amount of$189,537 for a total amount
not to exceed$3,067,279.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
(13) INFORMATION ITEMS
h. PDC99-62. Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-60.
Doug Stewart provided an update on the status of the project. The estimated
construction cost remains the same as last reported to the PDC in April 1999. Reasons
for the cost increase from the pre-design cost estimate were discussed.
I. Year 2000 Date Compliance Proiect—Year-end Status Report.
Patrick Miles reported that the project is at 29 days and counting downward. The
milestone dates were met and no major problems experienced. The project cost is
about $2.75 million. Mr. Miles reported on the major accomplishments. The Incident
Command System will be activated on December 31. The contingency plan is in place
and staff will be available to handle any anomalies that may happen on
December 31/January 1.
(14) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
December 2, 1999
(18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
February 3, 2000, at 5 p.m.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m.
Submitted by:
J a Tappan
D Committee Secretary
N:Wp.dlalagenft%PUdPDC99\99MINS1120299 minuft.d=
PDC COMMITTEE Mee ng Dae TOBd.or Dir.
12/02/99 12/15/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
Puev9-st ;� Ccl
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Lut rector of Engineering
Originator: ria I Thomas, Contract Project Manager
SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-25
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget of$1,113,637 for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 3-25.
SUMMARY
The Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer will provide a relief by-pass between the
existing Orange-Western Subtrunk and the Knott Interceptor Sewer. It will also allow for
future expansion and development at Knott's Berry Farm in the City of Buena Park
(City).
Construction plans for the project were prepared in 1990 by NBS Lowry, but the sewer
was not constructed due to a street construction moratorium in affect within the City.
Bypass relief is still needed for this sewer. Due to the anticipated opening of Knott's
Berry Farm's new water theme park next summer, the construction now needs to
proceed. The plans need to be updated to meet current District and City standards.
It is requested to establish a new budget from Revenue Area 3 reserves. The
construction for this project should start during the year 2000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The total budget for the relief sewer is
estimated at $1,113,637.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
%�banmau+a910Ma genda Dmneeporew 25 1202m.ax
Remsee. WOW Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Orange County Sanitation District (District)will update plans in-house without a
separate Engineering Consultant. Upsizing the entire Orange-Western Subtrunk would
be much more expensive.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives for this sewer work.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was covered under the 1983 Updated and Consolidated Master Plans of
Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11 and its supporting Program Environmental Impact
Report (PEIR). The PEIR was approved by the Districts' Board on February 8, 1984
and the Notice of Determination was filed on April 17, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
BKT:jo:jak
�mamumauimipaoarnaema Oren Reoonawocoas 120299aw
ae„x,. �n9a Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
CONSTRUCTION OF ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 3-25
ORIGINAL CURRENT. .PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET ` REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET' INCREASE BUDGET - TO DATE' - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $ 0%
Desi n Staff $ 42,024 $ 42,024 $ 42,024 0%
Consultant PSA $ $ 0%
Construction Contract $ 900.000 $ 0%
Construction Other $ $ 0%
Construction Staff $ 81,613 $ 0%
Contin en $ 90,000 $ 0%
TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 1,113,637 $ - $ 42,024 $ 42,024 $ 0%
h:Wm.dtalang\ 25 SWael Table
Form ReWsed 1T17M
PDC COMMITTEE Maau"g Dau To 8d.of Dil
faovss fvis
AGENDA REPORT al> NumEer Iem Num y
m 9-s 4l
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Lu i irector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION STUDIES, JOB NO. J-73-1,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ADS
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Service Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for Sanitary
Sewer Evaluation Studies, Job No. J-73-1, for a total amount not to exceed $74,235.
SUMMARY
The District is beginning an aggressive campaign to reduce rain dependant infiltration
and inflow (I&I) as part of the implementation of the District's Strategic Plan. The goal
of the I&I element in the Strategic Plan is to reduce wet weather peaking at the District's
two wastewater treatment facilities by 20%.
During the development of the Strategic Plan, Camp Dresser and McKee (CDM) and
ADS Environmental Services identified three areas that appear to have significant I&I.
These three "hot spots'were recommended for a more detailed Sanitary Sewer
Evaluation Studies (SSES). The SSES work will investigate possible causes of wet-
weather peaking and identify potential solutions. The SSES report will provide
estimates of I&I flow at the three "hot spots" and the cost to make repairs to mitigate MI.
This project has been reviewed by the Cooperative Projects Guidance Review
Committee and is recommended for approval by the Planning Design and Construction
Committee (PDC). The Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee consists of
nine members, as follows: District Directors McGuigan, Ferryman, and Anderson;
District General Manager, Don McIntyre, and Engineering Supervisor, Jim Herberg;
Garden Grove City Manager, George Tindall; Huntington Beach City Administrator, Ray
Silver; and Midway City Sanitation District General Manager, Del Boyer. This SSES
project is the first of several studies and projects that are planned to be brought forward
for approval from the Cooperative Projects Guidance Review Committee over the next
several years.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The proposed Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is a new contract. Please refer
to the attached Budget Information Table.
R, ;MM Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT r
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section s, Page 102)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The proposed PSA fee of$74,235 is included in the 1999-2000 CORF budget under
Job No. J-73. The total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is
$149,990,000 and will be spent over the next 20 years on projects reducing I&I
throughout the District. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District currently owns and maintains approximately 3% of the sewers within the
entire service area. As identified in the Strategic Plan, a majority of the wet weather
peaking is caused by I&I occurring in the local agencies' sewer systems. Of the
Strategic Plan I&I monitoring sites, the top three"hot spots" are recommended for
follow-up SSES work.
Of the three SSES areas, two are within the City of Yorba Linda local sewer system and
one is within the City of Newport Beach local sewer system. The SSES work will
employ manhole inspections, flow isolation tests, and smoke testing. The tests should
identify the sources and causes of I&I measured during the District's 1998 flow
monitoring program. These projects will serve as pilot projects, providing the District
with experience and information on cost effective I&I mitigation.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not conduct the SSES work at this time. This alternative would not allow for the
immediate implementation of the I&I reducing measures identified in the Strategic Plan.
Ultimately, the no-action alternative could hinder the long-term goal of reducing I&I by
20% and cause additional treatment costs avoided in the Strategic Plan.
CECIA FINDINGS
This project is categorically exempt.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Proposal Letter from ADS Environmental Services dated October 25, 1999
JDH:JB:jak
G?ntglobal'Agenda Draft Report TDCV-7}1 AR 120299.dw
RwbM: a Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION STUDIES FOR THREE (3) COLLECTION AREAS
JOB NO. J-73-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $ 0%
Design Stall $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 3.578 1%
Consultant PSA $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ 74,235 $ 74.235 0%
Construction Contract $ $ $ 0%
Construction(Other) $ 149.170.000 $ 149.170.000 $ 149.170,000 $ 2,235,156 $ 2,235,156 0%
Construction Staff $ $ $ 0%
Contingency $ $ $ 0%
TOTAL $ 149.990.000 $ 149,990.000 $ - $ 149.990.000 $ 2,575,156 $ 74,235 $ 2.649.391 $ 3,578 0%
R\wp dIa%ngVamis%Wget lable
Fmm Revised IW17/6e
f A a
------ iNV IRCNYH..HL HHHVICHH --- - -
October 25, 1999
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attention: Mr. James Burror, P.E.
Subject: Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study-Fee Proposal
Ladies and Gentlemen:
ADS Environmental Services is pleased'to submit our fee proposal for your Sanitary
Sewer Evaluation Study for three (3) collection areas in the OCSD Service Area. This
proposal is for the entire scope of work as described in the Request for Proposal and is
as follows.
Orange County Sanitation District
Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study
Fee Proposal
Burdened labor $20,060
'Overhead at 180% $36,108
Profit (includes overhead and $ 5,617
burdened labor) at 10%
Subtotal $61,785
Direct costs, not to exceed $12,450
Total, not to exceed $74,235
'This overhead rate applies to SSES projects only
A unit cost breakdown is as follows:
e Manhole Inspection: $65/manhole
H Smoke Testing: $0.16llinear foot
H Flow Isolations: $175/flow isolation
A complete fee breakdown is attached in spreadsheet form. If you have any questions,
please call me at(619) 571-0045.
Very truly yours,
ADS Environmental Services
C
Jeff Berk, P.E.
Project Director
ANA%EL JOHNSON INC.COMPANY
4820 Mercury Street,Suite C•San Diego.CA 92111-1426•Phone:858.5714)045•Fax:858-277-98M
Orange County Sanitation District
Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey _
Hours MVV
Title PD PM PE FM FR FA ADM Total
Task No. Task Description Rate $ 46 $ 31 $ 35 $26 $20 $ 16 $ 11 Cost
1.0 Manhole Inspection(427 manholes)
1.1 Kick-off Meeting 4 4 $ 308
1.2 Mobilization 4 4 6 6 $ 444
1.3 Manhole Inspection(427 manholes) 4 16 16 192 192 $ 8.008
1.4 Data Base Entry 32 $ 352
Subtotal ae 81 241 01 2Fr—fWF79-8F-32 9,
2.0 Smoke Testing(91.230 IQ
2.1 Kick-off Meeting 4 4 $ 308
2.2 Public Notification 16 16 It 576
2.3 Mobilization 4 4 B 8 $ 516
2.4 Smoke Testing(91,230 11) 4 12 16 64 64 $ 3,276
2.5 Data Base En l 16 $ 176
Subtotal ae 01 201 881 BE 6
3.0 Flow Isolations(48 Flow Isolations)
3.1 Klck-off Meeting 4 4 $ 308
3.2 Mobilization 2 2 4 4 $ 258
3.3 Flow Isolations(48) 2 4 4 a 40 40 $ 2,004
3,4 Data Base En l a $ 88
Subtotal ae k(l 61 101 41 101441 8 $ 2,65
4.0 SSES Report
4.1 Draft Report 4 8 40 4 $ 1,876
4.2 Final Report 4 6 16 4 $ 974
4.3 Presentation 4 4 6 $ 588
Subtotal as 4.0 121 181541 ol ol 01 8 ,4J9
PD PM PE 1 FM FIR FA ADM
T-wi P.j..t Cost Summary 1 341 7211 BBI 501133D 3301 84 20,060
Overhead 180% 38,108
Subtotal $ 58,168
Profit 10% It 5,617
Subtotal $ 61,785
Direct Casts
Printing $ 1,500
Smoke Bombs $ 950
Subsistence(lodging 5 Per Diem) $ a,000
Pennhs $ 2,000
2.450
Grand Total $ 74,235 �„
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dare To ad.of Dir.
11/7l99 iz/rs/ss
AGENDA REPORT 're'""""tief 'I PDC99-5 e
Orange County Sanitation Di
FROM: David Lu irector of Engineering
Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget amendment of$22,405,756 for Area Classification Studies
Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, for a revised total project
cost of$29,620,416.
SUMMARY
The recently completed Area Classification Study of both plants has provided the
District with a uniform documentation system showing potential fire and explosion
hazard locations throughout the plants. The study identified many conditions that
met code requirements at the time of construction, but are now in violation of
today's code requirements. The study evaluated various options to bring all
facilities into compliance with the latest OSHA/code standards.
Compliance with hazardous location installation requirements is mandated for all
facilities by the National Electric Code (NEC). Electrical hazardous area
requirements under the NEC are retroactive and so must be applied to existing
facilities. Potentially hazardous areas must be built using special methods and
materials. Implementation of these projects will provide the District with full
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) compliance identified in the Area
Classification Study.
This Agenda Report establishes the budget for the following projects:
• J-35-4 Fire Protection/Detection/Gas Detection $ 3,826,557
• J-35-5 Ventilation Modifications $ 2,972,343
• J-35-6 Electrical Retrofit $15,606,856
Total $ 22,405,756
Staff originally created five projects to implement the study recommendations.
The Board has approved the initial budget of$6,069,664 for two projects J-35-2
and J-35-3 on October 27, 1999. Upon the urging of the Planning Design and
Construction Committee (PDC), Staff recommends acceleration of projects
Page 1
J-35-4, J-35-5, J-35-6 and requests budget approval of$22,405, 756. Staff will
also accelerate the project implementation by consolidating the five projects into
one design with two construction contracts.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The funds for these projects are not contained in the FY 1999-00 Capital
Improvement Budget. The costs of remedial projects that resulted from
recommendations of this study were not budgeted for this fiscal year because
they were unknown at the time the budget was prepared.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
While these are unbudgeted projects, sufficient funds exist in the Capital
Improvement Program budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Area classification is defined as establishing boundaries where different
possibilities for an explosion exist. A hazardous location is normally defined as a
location where fire or explosion hazards exist due to the presence of flammable
gases or vapors, flammable liquids, etc. Class 1, Division 1 is a location where
an explosive mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist under normal operating
conditions. Class 1, Division 2 is a location where an explosive mixture of gas,
vapor, etc., and air can exist under abnormal conditions such as accidental
rupture of a vessel or container, or failure of a ventilating system.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) published a recommended
practice entitled NFPA 820 in 1992. This document provided nationally
recognized criteria for fire protection for wastewater treatment and collection
facilities. The document was changed in 1995 from a recommended practice to
a mandatory standard.
Job No. J-35-1 is the Area Classification Study itself, which was approved by the
Board on September 23, 1998. The Area Classification Study identified and
documented the hazardous locations by creating area classification drawings.
Code deficiencies in the plants were noted. Alternative solutions to code
violations were examined and the most cost-effective design was selected for
implementation. The recommended course of action for the full compliance with
NFPA 820 is charted in the Final Report for the Area Classification Study.
a.m.e. m Page 2
Five projects have been created to fully implement NFPA 820:
• J-35-2 Gas Piping Relocation and Physical Separation at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-3 Administrative Controls Program
• J-35-4 Fire Protection/ Detection System, and Combustible Gas System at
Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-5 Ventilation Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-6 Electrical Retrofit at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
Job No. J-35-2 will relocate the low-pressure digester gas piping in the tunnels at
Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to aboveground racks, thereby eliminating potential gas leaks
inside the tunnels. It will also physically separate classified areas from
unclassified areas.
Job No. J-35-3 will develop an administrative controls program for fire prevention
and protection at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This will conform to NFPA 820
requirements and provide on-going control of the fire and safety systems.
Job No. J-35-4 provides the systems necessary to detect gas leaks and fires.
This will provide advance safety warning to personnel at Plant Nos. 1 and 2.
Job No. J-35-5 improves the ventilation system's ability to remove potential
explosive gases throughout the classified areas at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This will
reduce the requirements for special equipment and installations methods and
increase personnel safety.
Job No. J-35-6 will replace the existing general-purpose equipment and common
installations with special equipment and special installation methods. This will
reduce the explosion hazard by the elimination of ignition sources within areas
potentially containing gases at explosive concentrations.
Implementation of the above-mentioned projects will provide the District with full
compliance with NFPA 820 as well as other NFPA regulations identified in the
Area Classification Study J-35-1.
The Board approved budgets for J-35-2, Gas Piping Relocation/ Physical
Separation and J-35-3, Administrative Control Program on October 27, 1999.
Upon the urging of the PDC, staff re-evaluated the project schedule.
Consequently, the following changes have been made to the proposed
implementation plan:
1) This Agenda Report requesting additional funds for the project is
submitted to the Board of Directors for approval now rather than
waiting for the normal budget cycle.
2) The five projects will be combined into a single Professional Services
Agreement(PSA)for design. This will reduce coordination issues and
allow all projects to begin at the same time.
,,,, Page 3
3) The design will produce two construction contracts, one for Plant 1 and
one for Plant 2. Using one contractor for all sub-projects will reduce
coordination problems and allow a shortened schedule.
Staff believes restructuring the projects as indicated will result in a shorter
schedule with minimal cost increase. The following implementation schedule is
structured according to the urgency of the remedial modifications:
Days to Complete Start Date End Date
J-35-2 580 December 1999 April 2002
J-35-3 750 December 1999 June 2002
J-35-4 575 December 1999 April 2002
J-35-5 505 December 1999 December 2001
J-35-6 605 December 1999 May 2002
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives to the mandated Area Classifications Studies are available. This
project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safety requirements as
defined by the National Electric Code.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table -Jab No. J-35 Summary
2. Budget Information Table -Job No. J-35-4
3. Budget Information Table- Job No. J-35-5
4. Budget Information Table- Job No. J-35-6
MY:jak:jo
G9nI91obaM9en0a Draft ReportsXPDCU35 AR 120299.00c
n W:a Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Fire Protection/ Detection / Gas Detection
JOB NO. J-35-4
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ $
Design Staff $ 120,223 $ 120.223 $
Consultant PSA $ 414,594 $ 414,594 $
Construction Contract $ 2.340,536 $ 2,340.536 $
Construction(Other) $ 7.389 $ 7.389 $
Construction Staff $ 306,057 $ 306.057 $
Contingency $ 637.760 $ 637,760 $
TOTAL $ - $ - $ 3,826.557 1 $ 3,826,557 1 1$ $ - $ - S
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Ventilation Modifications
JOB NO. J-35-5
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%(
Project Development $ - $ $
Design Staff $ 96.967 $ 96,9fi7 $
Consultant PSA $ 321.865 $ 321.865 $
Construcion Contract $ 1.810,656 $ 1.810,656 $
Construction(Otheo $ 6,848 $ 6,848 $
Constmclion Staff $ 240.616 $ 240.616 $
Contingency $ 495,390 $ 495.390 $
TOTAL $ - $ - $ 2.972,343 1 $ 2,972.343 1 $ - $ - $ - $
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Electrical Retrofit
JOB NO. J-35-6
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTTTASN AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ $
Design Staff $ 440.936 $ 440.936 $
Consultant PSA $ 1.693.400 S 1.693,400 $
Construction Contract $ 9,648,0D0 $ 9,648,000 $
Construction(Other) $ 14,847 $ 14,847 $
Construction Staff $ 1.208,530 $ 1.208.530 $
Contingency $ 2,601.143 $ 2,601,143 $
TOTAL $ - $ - $15.606,8561 $15,606.856 $ - S - $ - $
PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Dak 7o ea.or mr.
r2291 9 12/15/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ikm Nu
PdC94-S9 /7� )
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwr irector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate
SUBJECT: GRIT AUGER REPLACEMENT, JOB NO. J-52
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a sole source equipment purchase.
SUMMARY
In September 1996, the Board approved the purchase and installation of a new
grit removal system for testing. The system showed promise in reducing
operation and maintenance costs and providing more reliable service. The test
system has been highly successful in reducing costs and improving the removal
of grit by over 60 percent. After the initial installation, maintenance has been
reduced by nearly 90 percent. Since the acceptance period, there have been no
equipment failures. This project will install similar systems at both facilities.
CGvL Engineers prepared the plans and specifications. The installation of this
equipment will be publicly advertised and bid. A pre-negotiated equipment
purchase price of$407,900 is listed as a separate line item in the bid documents.
This project will be brought back to the Board for award of a construction contract
to the low construction bidder.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The budget for construction of Job
No. J-52 is $903,200. The engineer's cost construction opinion is $820,249,
including the equipment purchase.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section e, Page too)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
arneee: ,ondee Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Headworks at both plants have a process where grit, rocks, and other heavy
items are removed, placed into dumpsters, and taken to landfills for disposal.
The grit chamber is an area where the wastewater velocity is slowed to a point
where the heavy constituents are settled to the bottom of the structure. The
system relies upon the grit auger equipment to remove the settled material from
the structure. If this system is not in service, then the heavy materials are carried
through the treatment process and accumulate in the digesters. When excessive
grit is placed in the digesters, the amount of volume available for the destruction
of solids in the digesters is reduced, making the system inefficient.
The existing grit auger system was put in service approximately 30 years ago at
Plant No. 2 and 10 years ago at Plant No. 1. Both systems have become
inefficient and a severe maintenance problem. Repairs are frequent and costly.
Frequently, more than one grit auger is out of service and grit is carried over into
the digesters.
In September 1996, the Board approved the purchase, installation and testing of
a new grit removal system that showed promise in reducing operation and
maintenance costs and providing more reliable service. The test system has
been highly successful in reducing costs and improving the removal of unwanted
grit by over 60 percent. After the initial installation, maintenance has been
reduced by 90 percent.
This project will install two additional systems at Plant No. 2 and replace the
remaining two systems at Plant No. 1. This project also includes upgrades to the
test system as well as permanent access walkways, automation, and remote
monitoring from the Control Centers. Upon equipment failure, the system will
automatically actuate valves to divert the wastewater around the effected grit
chamber. This feature will relieve maintenance staff from entering a confined
space to remove accumulated grit and will protect the mechanical equipment
from unnecessary damage.
The construction plans and specifications require the successful contractor to
purchase the equipment from Giedich-Mitchell Incorporated at a specific price
listed in the bid documents. The equipment purchase cost was negotiated by
Staff with the equipment supplier. By having the contractor supply and install the
system, the equipment warranty is provided and supported by the contractor.
This procurement is sole source because this equipment has unique features not
found on other equipment. The equipment is similar to the chain and flight
system used to remove sludge from primary and secondary clarifiers. The
equipment purchase price of$407,900, including sales tax, is listed as a
separate line item in the bid documents and is based on the price paid for the
test equipment.
Page 2
Staff recommends approval of a sole source equipment purchase and installation
through a construction contractor, approval of plans and specifications, setting an
anticipated bid date of January 4, 2000, and authorizing the Director of
Engineering to advertise the Notice Inviting Bids.
ALTERNATIVES
None, the system must be improved to lower operation and maintenance costs.
CEQA FINDINGS
Grit Auger Replacement was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989
Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19,1989 and the Notice of
Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
JRH:jak
GmlglobaMgenda Dmft Reporte%PDCU-52 AR 120299.doo
a.. : ,aas'oe Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
GRIT REMOVAL SYSTEM
JOB NO. J-52
'ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT7TASK-` AUTHORIZED PROJECT -BUDGET- REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET. '.INCREASE BUDGET: � TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Proect Development $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 100%
Desi n Staff $ 7.500 $ 7.500 $ 7.500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7.000 93%
V
A $ 33.000 $ 33,000 $ 33000 $ 28,000 $ 28.000 $ 28,000 100%
Contract $ 903,200 $ 903.200 $ 903.200 $ 0%
Other $ 74.000 $ 74.000 $ 74.000 $ 0%
Staff $ 94,100 $ 94,100 $ 94,100 $ 0%
$ 97.600 $ 97.600 $ 97,600 $ 0%$ 1.210.0001 $ 1,210.000 $ - $ 1.210.000 $ 36,100 $ - $ 36.100 $ 35.600 99%
h:\".Elabn94o5s con"dsV-50BUE9et Taek Sole Sou"AR
1e118199
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 8d.or Di .
I212M 17/15/%
AGENDA REPORT Item Number ItemN m
Orange County Sanitation Di 'ct -
FROM: David Lud ' i t rector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Hams, Principal Engineering Associate
SUBJECT: OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT, JOB NO. J-66
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve plans and specifications for the Outfall Flow Meter Replacement, Job
No. J-66, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2)Authorize the General
Manager to set January 11, 2000, at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; (3)Authorize the
Director of Engineering to publish the Notice Inviting Bids; and (4)Approve a
budget amendment of$200,000 for a total project budget of$1,124,000.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for the Outfall Flow Meter Replacement, Job
No. J-66, were completed in November of 1999. Tran Consulting Engineers
performed the design. The current cost of construction opinion, $714,000
exceeds the budgeted amount by$200,000. The increase in cost is due to
geotechnical conditions that were unanticipated when the original construction
budget was developed.
Upon approval of this budget amendment, the project will be advertised for public
bidding. The project will be brought back before the Board of Directors for
awarding a construction contract to the lowest responsive bidder.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District operates and maintains a pumping system that discharges treated
effluent five miles into the ocean. The associated piping system includes a
\1[ppgMYp1N1(�ppyNytlpe Qall F[ppp1POQ1daM IA3%.0%
In>II� Page 1
i
120-inch outfall pipe, sampling equipment, and a flow meter. Discharge permits
require continuous monitoring and recording of total flow of effluent entering the
ocean. The existing flow meter is located underground in a highly confined
space and maintenance cannot be performed without a confined space entry
permit. Also, due to the piping configuration, the meter provides inaccurate flow
data during those periods when additional outfall pumps are started. The design
also includes modifications to eliminate this problem.
This project will install a new outfall flow meter in an underground structure. The
open structure is designed to be safely entered for maintenance, eliminating the
need for confined space entry. Instrumentation is provided to transmit flow
information to the existing computer monitoring system.
A preliminary design report was completed evaluating alternatives to the outfall
flow meter problems. The report recommended the type of flow meter,
placement, and other associated items. A preliminary budget was developed
according to this report. During the detailed design phase, the consultant, Tran
Consulting Engineers, required an additional soil survey to obtain additional
information for the structural design. This report by a geotechnical engineer
determined that a much more substantial foundation than was originally
envisioned is required. The unknown geotechnical condition included poor sandy
soil that is subject to liquefaction during an earthquake, and the relatively close
proximity to the Newport-Inglewood fault system. The design engineers
subsequent cost of construction opinion, now taking into account a modified
foundation, is $200,000 more than the preliminary estimate which is $514,000.
ALTERNATIVES
None. This project should proceed due to the difficulties associated with
maintenance of the existing flow meter facility.
CEQA FINDINGS
Outfall Flow Meter Replacement was included in the Programmatic EIR for the
1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19,1989 and the Notice
of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
JRH:jak
G1nlglobalkAgenda Draft ReportsTDCU-66 AR 120299.dm
,WaI1WaW1NI01MaIM,1.0W1 R,,.A CV AR 12019AX
loa„,.s Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT
JOB NO. J-66
ORIGINAL CURRENT -PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS - THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
'.PROJECTITASK - `AUTHORIZED PROJECT ':BUDGET .`' REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET' . -INCREASE'"- BUDGET -TO DATE : REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Pro ect Development $ $
Design Staff $ 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 6,748 15%
E
$ 57,200 $ 57,200 $ 57,200 $ 57,200 $ 57.200 $ 50,127 88%
act $ 514,000 $ 514,000 $ 200,000 $ 714,000 $r $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $
$ 135,700 $ 135.700 $ 135,700 $
Contingency $ 145.100 1 $ 146,1001 $ 145.100 is
TOTAL $ 924,000 1 $ 924,000 $ 200,000 1 $ 1,124,0001 1 $ 102,200 1 $ - $ 102,200 $ 56,875 56%
H-.".dwwngUOBS S CO ITRACTSU-66yJ66 AR Budget Info Ta6Ie.xislDistdcts
PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date Tosa.ofDlr.
12-02-99 12-15-99
AGENDA REPORT ipmN961er it�N r
Orange County Sanitation District _
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer
SUBJECT: DESIGN OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS AND RELATED FACILITIES,
JOB. NO. 131-37, ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT (PSA)WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and
Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job. No. P1-37,
providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$189,537 for a total
amount not to exceed $3,067,279.
SUMMARY
The District's Strategic Plan requires additional primary treatment capacity to be in
place at Plant No. 1 by 2003. In September 1998, a Professional Services Agreement
(PSA) was issued to Brown and Caldwell for design and construction support services
for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for$1,993,000.
Addendum No. 1, which was approved In April 1999, increased the contract amount
$863,185, for a total PSA amount of$2,856,185. When the original PSA was approved,
the Scope of Work included studies for optimizing the Plant No. 1 primary treatment
process. Options that were found to be cost-effective in the studies were added to the
design Scope of Work through Addendum No.1.
Addendum No. 2, which was approved in November 1999, increased the contract
amount $21, 557, for a total PSA amount of$ 2,877,742. This additional work involved
an investigation of high rate clarifiers located throughout Canada and Europe.
Proposed Addendum No. 3 adds the following project elements:
• Design and construction support efforts to fully automate existing primary
clarifiers 6-15 for unattended operations
• Design of additional foul air equipment needed to improve odor control
throughout primary clarifiers 6-15
• Construction support services involved with additional work added in
Addenda Nos. 1-3
The cost for Addendum No. 3 is $189,537, for a total PSA amount of$3,067,279.
a .W:eao•e Page 1
r
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the
PSA, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, and this pending Addendum No. 3.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: Section s—Page 68)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The original budget for this project was $38,450,000, based on preliminary estimates
developed in the 1989 Master Plan. In the 1999-00 budget, the total budget for this
project was revised to $75,410,000. This total budget amount includes design and
construction costs necessary to build primary clarifiers 16-31 and related facilities. It
also includes design and construction costs associated with the recommended
improvements which were approved by the Board via Addendum Not. The original
project concept did not include costs associated with:
• Design and construction support efforts to fully automate existing primary
clarifiers 6-15 for unattended operations
• Design of additional foul air equipment needed to improve odor control
throughout primary clarifiers 6-15
• Construction support services involved with additional work added in
Addenda Nos. 1-3
The cost for Addendum No. 3 is $189,537, for a total PSA amount of$3,067,279. The
proposed PSA fee of$3,067,279 is included in the 1999-2000 CORF Budget. As a
result, a budget increase is not necessary. Please refer to the attached Budget
Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
In September 1998, the District issued a PSA to hire Brown and Caldwell for
preliminary design studies, final design, and services during construction for Primary
Clarifiers 16-31. This project includes design of an additional 96-mgd of primary
treatment facilities and improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers No. 6-15. The
96-mgd is based on recommendations in the Strategic Plan, and will provide capacity to
the year 2010. The need for this additional capacity is independent of decisions
regarding implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System or level of
treatment.
wawa: emne Page 2
c In January 1999, Brown and Caldwell submitted the Final Project Report, which
included results of preliminary design studies which were conducted in an effort to
1 optimize the operation and maintenance of all primary clarifiers and related facilities at
Plant No. 1.
In April 1999, the Board approved Addendum No. 1, in an amount of$863,185, for
additional design services needed to add the following project element to the original
scope of work:
1) Centralized primary sludge thickening system
2) Trickling filter feed from P1-37 primary clarifiers
3) Primary influent flow distribution system
4) Primary scum handling
5) Modifications of existing primary clarifiers
In August 1999, Primary Treatment Workshop#1 was held, as a result of the plant
automation and re-invention efforts conducted in Job No. J-42. It was decided that it
would be timely, cost effective, and appropriate to include the automation needs of
primary clarifiers 6-15 to Job No. P1-37. Upon completion of Job No. P1-37, primary
clarifiers 6-31 (P1-33 & P1-37)will have the ability to be operated remotely for
unattended operations. This additional work effort is included in this Addendum No. 3.
In November 1999, the General Manager approved Addendum No. 2, in an amount of
$21, 557, to investigate and evaluate the application of high rate clarifiers in lieu of
conventional primary clarifiers, as recommended by the District's Value Engineer.
In November 1999, District's staff completed an investigation of odor problems
associated with the primary clarifiers at Plant No.1. The investigation included a
television inspection of the foul air duct system and flow measurements taken through
the plant. It was decided to recommend inclusion of the necessary improvements to
Job No. P1-37. The recommended improvements are included via Addendum No. 3.
ALTERNATIVES
Not proceeding with Addendum No. 3, Job No. P1-37 (NO ACTION). The no action
alternative could eliminate the implementation of process improvements necessary to
reduce foul air release from the primary clarifiers at plant Nc.1. It also would delay the
plant automation needs of primary clarifiers 6-15, which will be needed in the future.
This may result in increased odor complaints, higher operation and maintenance costs,
and higher future capital costs.
CEQA FINDINGS
Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19,1989, and Notice of Determination
filed on July 20, 1989.
ft.W. � Page 3
ATTACHMENTS ,
1. Budget Information Table A
2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
3. Proposal Letter from Brown and Caldwell dated November 3, 1999
CJH:jak
G:NtgbbaMgeM Deft Repoft\PDMP1-37-120299ARPDC.doc
e Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities
Job No. P1-37
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT - BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 100%
Design Staff $ 817.500 $ 817,500 $ 817.500 $ 817,500 $ 200,000 24%
Consultant PSA $ 3,170,000 $ 3,170,000 $ 2,877,742 $ 189,537 $ 3.067.279 $ 1,300,000 42%
Construction Contract $ 55.419,800 $ 55.419,800 $
Construction(Other $ 287,070 $ 287,070 $
Construction Staff $ 3,467,000 $ 3,467,000 $
Contingent $ 12,228.730 $ 12,228,730 $
TOTAL $ 38.450.000 $ 75.450,100 $ - [$ 75,450,100 1 1 $ 3,755.242 1$ 189,537 $ 3,944,779 $ 1.560,000 1 40%
H:WpdtaW9U0BS 8 COW CTSW1-3TIP1-37 Budpl Tad .B4C.ADD k3.x1sjM16ds
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. P1-37
Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities
Total Project Budget: $ 75,450,100
Consultant: Brown and Caldwell
Start Date of Project: September 1998
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
9/23/98 Original PSA Provide engineering services for 96-MGD Primary $1,993,000 $1,993,000
Clarifiers and Related Facilities
4/28/99 1 Provide engineering services for: (1) rehabilitation of $863,185 $2,856,185
existing primary clarifiers; (2) centralized sludge
collection and transfer facilities (3) modification to
Influent distribution structure; and (4) installation of
trickling filter feed line
11/15/99 2 Provide engineering services needed to conduct an $21,557 $2,877,742
evaluation of high rate clarifiers as recommended by
the Value Engineer
Pending 3 Provide engineering design services necessary to $189,537 $3,067,279
improve odor control and automate the P1-33
clarifiers. Provide construction support services
involved with additional work added in Addenda
Nos. 1-3
Hiwp.d1MangU08S S CONTRACTSW 7-37W7-37 PSA SbUn Repod.S&C.Add 83.doc
1113=9
Revind 05114198
- ImM.Co 92E0E
Te119+91E IC70
Fax.19a9N74f940
November 3, 1999
Mr.David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Orange County Sanitation District
E-.mnmr-w fv"e-r,,a r.rsA,-9 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,California 92708 12/17141-021
Subject: Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities
Job No.P1-37,Addendum No.3
Dear Mr.Ludwin:
As discussed,we are requesting a revision to our contract to include additional scope
items in Job No.P1-37.These items were suggested by the District's staff.
1. Change design of the existing P1-33 facilities to be fully automated for
unattended operation.
Modifying the design of the existing scum collectors, gates, stun pumping
stations and polymer feed system was included in our scope of work by
Addendum No. 1.This work will include changing the design of the
remaining Pl-33 facilities (ten sludge collectors, four sump pumping stations,
and agitation air blowers) to be fully automated for unattended operation
with remote control Capabilities.The revised design will include preparation
of the following items for the foregoing facilities:
1. PLC programming and SCADA HIM configuration to District's
standards (PLC programming will be done by a subconsultant).
2. P&IDs showing all instruments and instrument signal lines and
interlocks.
3. Control diagrams.
4. Instrument loop diagrams to District's standards.
5. PLC I/O listing and PLC rack loading diagrams.
The con for engineering services for changing the design of the remaining
PI-33 facilities will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $31,179
Direct Costs 515,000
Profit $2,026
Total 548,205
,N"\jossv7141u01971 «
Mr.David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 3, 1999
Page 2
2. Modifications to the existing P1-33 odor control system.
The OCSD staff had suggested several modifications and/or improvements
to the existing P1-37 odor control system. These improvements were
summarized in a memorandum from Ed Torres to Chuck Hodge. As
requested,Brown and Caldwell reviewed the OCSD staffs suggestions and
submitted our response on October 1, 1999. Subsequently,the District has
agreed to include the following items in Project P1-37:
a. Remove existing covers from influent channels,effluent channels,spliner
box and effluent launders and replace with new interlocking type
aluminum coven.
b. Redesign the foul air ducts for P1-33 clarifiers to prevent water from
entering into the foul air system.
c. Design condensate collection and pumping system for unattended
operation.
The cost for the engineering services for designing modifications to the existing Pl-
33 odor control system will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $31,321
Direct Costs 500
Profit 2,036
Total $33,857
3. Design modifications to the existing P1-33 facilities.
This work will include providing washroom facilities in the Primary Clarifier
Control Building and making improvements to existing P1-33 sludge
collector drives.
The cost for engineering services for this task will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $11,628
Direct Costs 50
Profit 756
Total $12,434
4. Provide construction support services for the additional scope items
identified in Addendum No. 1 and Addendum No. 3.
The following additional items were included in our scope of work for the
construction of primary clarifiers and related facilities.
,\a \pb,\17141\101953a 3d
• Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E.
November 3, 1999
Page 3
Addendum No. 1:
1. Centralized sludge thickening system.
2. Trickling filter feed pipeline.
3. New primary influent flow distribution system.
4. Primary scum collection and pumping system.
5. Rehabilitation of existing primary treatment facilities.
Addendum No. 3:
1. Redesign P1-33 electrical/instrumentation system for unattended
operation.
2. Modifications to the existing P1-33 odor control system.
3. Design modifications to the existing facilities.
This item will include the following tasks to provide services during construction for
the additional items inducted in Addendum No. I and Addendum No. 3:
Task 1. Review and approve shop drawings submitted by the
contractor.
Task 2. Furnish consultation and advise District's staff in clarifying the
plans and specifications (assumed 60 hours).
Task 3. Assist District in startup,initial operation and shutdown of the
facilities (assumed 70 hours).
Task 4. Prepare formal revisions to construction documents for change
orders as directed by the District (assumed 64 hours).
Task 5. Revise the construction plans to prepare the record drawings.
Task 6. Update existing O&M manuals to reflect changes in PI-33
facilities.
Task 7. Provide operation and maintenance training(assumed 80
hours).
pA"\job,\V NI\1019SY,dd ldm
Ivir.David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 3, 1999
Page 4
The cost for providing construction support services is:
Direct
1 Labor&Overhead Costs Profit Total
Task 1 1 528,642 $200 $1,8621 530,7C4
Task 2 1 6,840 50 444 7,334
Task 3 7,980 1,000 518 9,498
Task 4 6,270 50 407 6,727
Task T 8,949 50 581 9,580
Task 6 23,085 500 1,5CO 25,083
Task 7 6 811 1,0001 442 8,253
Total 1 ••$88,5771 1 $2,8501 1 $5,7541 597,181
5. Miscellaneous additions and deletions to the scope of work.
These items include miscellaneous changes during the design and
development of Project P 1-37. These changes include:
■ Deletion of gravity sludge line from Primary Clarifiers 1 through 5.
■ Deletion of the new scrubber. The work was put on hold in
October, 1999.
■ Adding new MCC at the polymer facility.
■ Modifying all e:dsting inlet diffusers at P133 clarifiers.
■ Adding new ferric chloride storage system.
The cost for the miscellaneous engineering services is:
Deletions Additions I Difference
Labor and Overhead 1 $15,6741 1 $13,665 <$2,009>
Direct Costs 50 50
Profit 1019 888 <$131>
Total $16:743 $14,603 <$2,140>
,\"\jobs\I7NI\Ial9nndd 3.d
• Mr.David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 3, 1999
Page 5
The summary of change items is:
Direct
Labor&Overhead Costs Profit Total
Item $31,179 $15000 $2,026 $48,205
Item 2 31,321 500 2,036 33,857
Item 3 11,628 50 756 12,434
Item 4 88,577 2,850 5,754 97,181
Item 5 < 009> <131> <2,140>
Total 1 1 $160,6961 1 $18,4001 1 $10,441 $189,537
The total cost for the work included in Addendum No. 3 is$189,537.
We would be pleased to discuss this estimate with you at your convenience. Please
call me or Azee Malik if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Robert M.Finn
Vice President
AMRF.rug
Attachment
p\"\jobs\17141\101953 add J m
FAHR COMMITTEE MeedngDate TOJGBQs.
12/08/99 12/15/99
AGENDA REPORT Rem NumberIb m ofNumber
j
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
NOVEMBER1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the ALiquid Operating Monies=_ and for the ALong-Term Operating
Monies.=_ The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both
PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-
market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in
value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation
sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
MM tlhYeerde .A,.d.R."k' 6R .Ap..J.FepoN11%TXem 181r1.tl.
R,,,,,, 1WIM Page 1
Y
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a
consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is
attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and
reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values
and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio.
Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports.
Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance
with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment
Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet
budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts Nov. 30, 1999 Yield I%)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 4,255.013 5.5
Union Bank Checking Amount 343,830 —
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 13,867.000 4.8
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 19,244,003 4.5
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 269,315,570 4.5
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,907 5.1
Debt Service Reserves C Trustees 32.155,302 6.1
Petty Cash 4,400 —
TOTAL $339.187,025
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
GGS:SK:Ic
M Avp.Ob� W4p Repo\iMGoW AWE R@ppp%I] m1W)Mc
R�. W17197 Page 2
Prepared by Finance, 12(/199, 1:38 PM
Monthly Treasurer's Report
District Fund Balances
$400,000,000
$300,000,000
$200,000,000
$100,000,000
$0
Jun, 99 Jul, 99 Aug, 99 Sep, 99 Oct, 99 Nov, 99
®PIMCO-Long-term 0PIMCO-Short-term
®Debt Service Reserves 0LAIF
l3 Bank Accts ■Petty Cash
M Dist i i GO Bond Fund
G:texmi.dtaVrn122201geggi%FinanmXmonthly treasurers report
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 November 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $19,286,268
• Mellon $19,244,003
Historical Cast:
• PIMCO $19,285,692
• Mellon $19,280,617
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $29,187
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 72%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
1 Month: 0.42 0.40
3 Months: 134 1.20
12 Months: 5.05 4.67
Year-to-Date: 4.61 4.28
Commentary
Imerest rotes rose minus all maturities in November in response to the 25 basis point Fed Funds rate increase on November 16o(e.g.3-month Treasury Bill roses rose 21 basis points).
The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmerk by 2 basis points in November.
PIMCO's emphasis on corporsaes end agencies added m portfolio rctums.
PIMCO will continue to hold high quality commercial paper and short-term notes to enhance rctums,
x:t..wwame_.uecnsFd uattw xrr
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 November 1999)
Long-Term Operating Monies(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $269,332,804
• Mellon $269,315,570
Historical Cost: $273,517,481
• PIMCO $274,018,117
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.25
Of Index: 2.37
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( aintloss)of 1%Change: $6,141,799
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 08/6
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 31%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averse Portfolio Credit Quality; "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Retum(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.30 0.16
3 Months: 1.57 1.21
12 Months: 2.74 2.55
Year-to-Date: 2.33 2.17
Commentary
With interest rates rising across all mamrlties again in November,the bond market wndnued to show weektt rctums.
The Long-Term portfolio outpttformed its benchmark by 14 basis points in November.
PIMCO's emphuis on mongege.backed securities,egenciu,end wrpumtm added to ponfollo returns,as these were the best performing sectors.
1 . PIMCO will continue to cone siee mortgage-backed securities to enhance mums.
H:l..Ir1hN ffl...WEY/SFD 4TIIaa.RPT
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 1
BASE. USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 30-NOV-1999 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,688,423.92 Z688,423.92 13.829/o 0.00
TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,181.67 17.53% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,486,396.11 2,496,396.11 12.79% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 1,698,510.11 1,689,510.11 8.68% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 92,461.43 92,461.43 0.48% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,366,973.24 10,366,973.24 53.28% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 10,366,973.24 10,366,971N 53.28% 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.AGENCIES 4,688,174.00 4,692,574.00 24.12% 4,400.00
ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 905,580.00 4.65% -333.00
BANKING&FINANCE 1,949,359.25 1,924,170.75 9.89% -25,188.50
INDUSTRIAL 1,370,198.00 1,354,705.00 6.96% -15,493.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 8,913,644.25 9,877,029.75 45.63% -36,614.50
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 8,913,644.25 45.63% 36,614SO
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 212,274.92 212,274.92 1.09°A 0.00
TOTAL 212,274.92 212,274.92 1.09% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 212,274.92 212,274.92 1.09% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,492,892.41 19,456,277.91 100.00% -36,61450
07-Dec-1999 11:19:34 £xe..0w Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-NOV-1999 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINtLOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 7,607.46 7,607.46 0.00% 0.00
RECEIVABLES 53,826.27 53,826.27 0.021/6 0.00
PAYABLES -26.790,634.38 -26,790,634.38 -9.82% 0.00
TOTAL -26,729.200.65 .26,729,200.65 -9.79% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 20,706,52237 20,706,522.37 7,59% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 7,165,614.00 7,165,614.00 2.63% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 13,012,927.85 13,012,927.85 4.77% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 40,985,064.22 40,885,064.22 14.98% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �,86757 14,155-,863.511 5.19% 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 66,410,142.33 64,638,699.04 23.68% -1,771,444.29
U.S.AGENCIES 66,510,402.41 65,408,679.15 23.97% .1,101,723.26
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 20,256,875.00 20,431,665.00 7.49% 174.790.00
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,827,614.21 3,796,652.35 1.39% -30,961.96
FHLMC POOLS 9,277,150.99 9,115,425.99 3.34% -161,725.00
FHLMC MULTICLASS 9,347,102.86 8,223,852.83 3.01% -123,250.03
FNMA POOLS 970,358.64 973,917.40 0.36% 3,559.76
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 78,602.22 78,552.71 0.03% 49.51
ABS:HOME EQUITY 465,766.73 464,746.70 0.17% -1,020.03
MUTUAL FUNDS I1000,000.00 988,540.00 0.36% -11,460.00
BANKING&FINANCE 56,039,764.00 55,770,906.00 20.43% -268,958.00
INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 15,922,340.60 5.83% -1,107,628.40
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,958,180.00 0.72% -193,070.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,387,650.00 2.71% -109,605.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 259,862,253.39 255,159,706.77 93.49% .4,702,546.62
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 259,862,253.39 255,159,706.77 93.49% -4,70 , . 2
07-Dee-1999 11:21:41 &ecuti"Wwkbench
Q r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-NOV-1999 FINAL
LONG TERAtOPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,617,718.50 3,617,718.50 1.33% 0.00
TOTAL 3,617,718.50 3,617,718.50 1.33% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,617,719.50 3,617,718.50 1.33% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 277,635,835.06 272,933,288.84 100.00% 4,702,546.62
07-Dec-1999 11:21:41 E<e wm WP ,kbenM
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
OCSF01511102 1999/11/30 RUN DATE : 12/03/99
DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 13.00.19
PAR VALUE YIM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 0 TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
92,461.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HURT .000 5.341 AAA 1DO.000 92,461.43 .89
99608524I AAA 92,461.43 .48
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 97.462 3,411,191.67 32.90
912395DK4 03/02/2000 DO 03/04/99 A-1+ 3,411,181.67 17.73
000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN DISC 5.239 .000 P-1 99.249 793,991.11 3.65
31358SWI MAT 12/17/1999 A-2+ 793,991.11 4.13
900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DISC 5.252 .000 P-1 99.391 894,519.00 8.62
313588QNS MAT 12/15/1999 A-1+ 894,519.00 4.65
903,000.00 HIKE INC DISC 5.326 .000 99.514 898,612.92 8.66
6541D3K66 12/01/1999 898,612.92 4.67
9DO,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.338 .000 P-1 99.293 093,640.00 8.62
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 893,64D.00 4.64
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MIG CORP DISC 5.431 .000 P-1 99.456 2,486,396.11 23.9E
313396QN9 HAT 12/10/1199 A-1+ 2,486,396.11 12.9E
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.493 .000 P-1 99.575 096,171.00 8.64
3695938F3 12/15/1991 096,171.00 4.66
________ _______ _________________ _________
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.123 .086 10,366,973.24 100.00
10,366,973.24 53.89
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DENS .000 4.007 AAA 99.953 999,200.00 11.25
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/10/99 AAA 999,530.00 5.19
900,000.00 GENERAL MISS ACCEP CORP MEN .ODD 6.253 A2 99.959 909,657.00 10.13
31042N2G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 A 899,631.00 4.67
B50,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC HTS 5.258 7.125 A2 100.000 863,753.00 9.57
318154BX4 7.1258 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 A 850,O0G.00 4.42
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN HIM BSB00130 5.653 8.436 A3 100.171 515,125.DO 5.64
893SOMPI 8.45D4 01/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 A 500,855.00 2.60
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2
MSF07512102 1999/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/03/95
DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.08.19
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
3,300,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BK CONS BUD 5.815 4.044 AAA 99.812 3,688,974.00 41.6D
3133M7EN2 4.835% 01/20/2000 DO 01/28/99 AAA 1,693,044.00 19.19
900,000.00 FORD MR CR MIN 9 TR 00538 6.312 6.977 Al 100.620 905,913.00 10.20
345402YKI 3.0201 10/10/2000 DO 10/10/95 A 905,580.00 4.31
400.0D0.00 LEMMAN NEWS SLOGS MTN TR 00252 6.353 6.413 A3 99.399 400,216.00 4.49
52513PLMI 6.400% 09/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 A 399.196.0D 2.03
500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO HT 6.535 9.610 A3 100.941 S06.445.00 5.18
460146A.32 9.300% 03/15/2000 DD 03/21/90 BBB. 504,705.00 2.62
125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 6.924 6.401 BAA1 99.591 124,361.25 1.40
319074AFS 6.335% 10/15/2000 DO 10/11/95 A- 124,488.75 .65
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.905 5.810 6,913,644.25 100.00
0,833,029.3S 46.12
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL 4.492 3.055 19,280,117.49 100.00
19,244,002.99 100.00
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
MSF07522202 1999/11/30 RUN DATE 1 12/03/19
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME S 13.00.19
PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ I TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
13,012,927.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGHT .000 5.341 AAA 100.000 13,012,927.85 31.82
996095247 AAA 13,012,927.85 4.40
7,200,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN RED CORP DISC 5.235 .000 P-1 99.522 7,165,614.00 17.52
313396QE6 MAT 12/03/1999 A-1a 1,165r614.00 2.42
6,400,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 5.209 .000 P-1 99.634 6.316r517.18 15.59
02225BZ37 12/03/1999 6.3]6,S7].78 2.15
500,000.00 HEINE NJ CO DISC 5.308 .000 P-1 99.402 497.360.00 1.21
42307KZ18 12/01/1999 497r360.0D .13
5,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.341 .000 P-1 99.308 5,362,605.56 13.11
63743DE07 12/08/1999 5,362,605.56 1.01
000,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 5.372 .000 P-I 99.599 796,790.00 1.94
74271SZDO 12/13/1999 396.790.00 .23
7,700,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 5.469 .000 P-1 99.652 7,673,189.03 18.36
04271S8A6 12/10/1599 7,673,189.03 2.59
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2.393 2.513 40,885,064.22 100.00
40,885,064.22 13.81
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 INSURERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.802 Al 99.892 1,992,800.00 .78
0663650M4 PLTG RT 05/11/2003 OD 05/11/98 A- 1,993.840.00 .67
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST .000 6.109 AAA 100.840 715,400.00 .20
11P0116C6 VAR RT 12/25/2028 AAA 736,132.00 .25
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN IM00615 .000 5.555 Al 99.859 3,498,635.00 1.36
171200EBO FLTG RT 08/09/2002 DO 04/08/98 A4 3,495,065.00 1.18
2,000,000.00 FORD SITE CA CO GLOBAL NTS .000 6.226 Al 99.500 1,992,580.00 .13
345397RV3 FLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,990,000.00 .63
2,000,000.00 FORD MEN CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 6.213 Al 99.828 1o998,613.60 .78
3453918CB FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,996,560.00 .67
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4
MSF07532202 1999/11/3D RUN DATE 12/03/99
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.08.19
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
3,000,000.00 GENERAL MINE ACCEP MTH .000 5.51E A2 100.312 3,010,830.00 1.17
31042MVR9 FLTG RT 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 A 3,009,360.00 1.02
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS RICHE CORD NTS .000 5.568 A2 99.988 3,918,768.50 1.54
3704250V5 FLTG RT 00/10/2003 DO 00/17/98 A 3,949,526.00 1.33
2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS .000 5.450 A3 100.510 2,000,000.00 .78
423329BKB FLTG RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 2,010,200.00 .68
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTH 9TR 00246 .000 5.650 A3 100.656 3,000,000.00 1.18
43333HLF1 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/27/99 A- 3,019,680.00 1.02
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO HER .000 5.440 A2 100.152 4.DOO,000.00 1.57
44181KXA5 PLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 A 4,006,080.00 1.35
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MEN SR $00570 .000 5.730 A2 100.242 999,188.90 .39
44101K0T4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DD 09/04/98 A 1,002,420.00 .34
7,337,330.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.697 3.654 AAA 99.203 1.314,173.11 2.85
9128273AD 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 AAA 1.278,852.48 2.46
10,595,700.00 U0 TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.721 3.546 AAA 95.187 10,316,675.00 3.95
9128212M3 3.3150 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 10.085.720.96 3.41
4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MEN #TR 00299 5.170 5.476 MY 99.703 3,991.788.00 1.56
61745EMLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DD 04/15/99 Ai 3,988,120.00 1.35
5,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.602 AAA 115.859 6,233,593.75 2.27
912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/83 AAA 5:192,950.00 1.96
2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.338 AAA 100.578 2,161.321.15 .82
912822X54 06.375% 09/30/2001 OD 09/30/96 AAA 2,112,138.00 .71
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.958 AAA 119.250 6,698,250.DO 2.43
91281ODGO 11.875% I1/15/2003 DO 10/05/93 AAA 6.201.ODO.OD 2.09
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES COMP N A SR HIS 5.650 6.544 AA3 99.323 1,543,215.00 .58
046003HYD 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 AA- 1,489,845.00 .50
1:000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.760 5.869 A3 97.970 999,730.00 .38
42333HKJO 5.1500 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 979.100.00 .33
1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.768 6.450 AAA 100.781 1,213,406.25 .47
912027Y22 06.500% 05/31/2001 DO 05/31/96 AAA 1,209,378.00 .41
YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 5
OCSF07S22202 1911/11/30 RUN DATE 12/03199
DIBTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME , 13.00.19
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 6-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
3,OOS,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTH 5.804 6.606 A2 17.012 2,060,739.00 .76
B124000S 6.5401 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,961,130.60 .66
23,430,000.00 U s TREASURY NOIEB 5.800 5.664 AAA 99.312 23,351,289.85 9.12
912627SQ1 05.625% 09/30/2001 DO D9/30/99 AAA 23,269,801.60 3.96
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.221 AAA 100.469 5,O86,402.25 1.96
9128272L5 06.250% 02/20/2002 DO 02/28/97 AAA 5,023,450.DO 1.70
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTH 5.849 6.327 A2 98.562 3,073,170.00 1.15
e1240Q3AI 6.630E 07/D9/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 2,956,660.00 1.00
14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MYV ASSN HIM 5.882 6.204 AAA 90.859 14,560,462.50 5.25
31364GLO9 5.710% 12/15/20DB DO 12/15/98 AAA 13t401,303.50 4.53
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CRAR207!TR N C MTN 5.892 5.856 AA 99.890 5,996,400.OD 2.34
638583DE6 5.SS01 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/90 AA- 5,993,400.00 2.02
_ 620,983.90 PBLNC MULTICL MTG P/C 1534 E 5.912 5.924 95.593 620,110.53 .24
3133702D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 618,456.40 .21
15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN MIN 5.981 5.867 AAA 99.203 14,955,300.00 5.93
31364G2V0 5.8201 07/19/2001 DD 07/19/99 AAA 14,880,450.00 5.03
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.415 AA3 99.383 2,526,725.00 .97
59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,494,575.00 .04
1,613,647.35 GMMA II POOL 10080023 6.005 6.042 AAA 101.375 1,640,373.39 .64
36225CAE9 6.125% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,635,035.00 .55
7,500,000.00 BEL.LSOUTE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.091 AAA 98.502 7,497,255.00 2.99
0)986)AK5 6.000% 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/90 AAA 7,387,650.00 2.50
12,500,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LN HTG CORE DBMS 6.062 6.032 AAA 99.470 12,485,625.00 4.87
3134A3EM1 6.000E 07/20/2001 DD O7/20/59 AAA 12,433,750.00 4.20
2,000,000.00 BANKSOSTVN CORP SR EYE 6.133 6.220 A2 98.437 1,999,600.00 .11
06605TAL6 6.125% 03/1S/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 2,969,540.00 .67
98,602.23 FIFTH THIRD BS AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.204 AAA 99.937 78,602.22 .03
31677EAM 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 1B,551.91 .03
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC HIM ITR 00004 6.201 6.272 A3 90.854 1,000,000.00 .30
73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 HER. 188,540.00 .33
YLDAMI. YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSF07522202 1999/11/30 RUN DATE 12/03/99
DISTRICV LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.08.19
PAR VALUE YTM AT CEMENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ODOM YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL
2,500,000.00 PMLNC NULTICLASS CTF 2146 W 6.203 6.101 AAA 90.343 2,455,859.38 .96
3133TKKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,458,575.00 .83
6,250,000.00 CONNIT TO PON GUM SF MTG 6.295 6.053 AAA 99.125 5,818,359.38 2.42
OIN0606CS 6.000% 12/15/2028 AAA 6,195,312.50 2.09
465,766.73 OMEN TREE COUP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.3D4 AAA 99.381 465,766.73 .18
3935052Y3 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/90 AAA 464,746.70 .16
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MIN 6.291 6.259 AAA 99.531 4,480,705.00 1.05
31364CWS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,478,895.00 1.51
3,266,672.18 FELMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.039 AAA 98.496 3,270,244.95 1.26
3133MR95 6.324% 08/15/2032 AAA 3,217,541.43 1.09
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEAMS COS INC 6.330 6.645 A2 98.607 2,031,960.00 .73
073902AHI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 1,972,140.00 .63
5,000,000.00 LEGMAN BROS RLDGS M2G 100196 6.364 6.650 A3 99.835 5,039,450.00 1.95
52513PJD4 6.6501 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 A 4,993,750.00 1.69
2,000,000.00 FMLRC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.738 AAA 16.464 2,000,888.00 .75
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,929,200.00 .65
21,500,000.00 CONMIT TO PON GUM SP HTG 6.518 6.840 AAA 95.031 20,256,875.00 8.00
OIN062615 6.5008 01/15/2029 AAA 20,431,665.00 6.90
2,312,872.94 FBLHC NULTICLASS CTF SEA 1620E 6.533 3.004 AAA 85.669 2,206,733.00 .99
3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AM 2,024,249.62 .69
9,000,000.00 PEILIP BEMIS COS NT 6.593 9.198 A2 100.567 9,903,790.00 3.54
318154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 A 9,051,030.00 3.06
9,134,425.60 FHLMC GROUP IGS-0476 6.629 0.015 AAA 91.392 9,290,150.99 3.59
3120DD0SS 7.0000 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 9,115,425.99 3.08
2,140,419.16 GNMA II POOL 1080009M 6.705 6.315 AAA 100.953 2,187,240.82 .84
36225CC20 6.335% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AM 2,160,817.35 .33
10,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG COUP ONES 6.711 6.421 AAA 92.109 10,323.075.00 4.03
3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/01/99 AAA 10,301,445.00 3.49
2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 NCLENHAN COS INC SR NT 6.313 6.783 A2 93.666 1,992,280.00 .36
571748MO 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,953,32D.00 .16
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i J
MSF07522202 1999/11/30 RUN DATE 12/03/99
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RON TIMB 13.DO.19
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY HONEST TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
3,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.706 Al 90.736 2,995,000.00 1.16
345397SS3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 2,962,080.00 1.00
2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE BORE LEE INC NT 6.866 6.959 A3 99.433 2,498,400.00 .96
22237UABS 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,460,925.00 .93
990,951.96 FNMA POOL #0252703 6.817 6.614 AAA 98.201 970,358.64 .38
31371HU40 6.500% 09/01/2006 DD 08/01/99 AAA 973,917.40 .33
2,500,000.00 U B TREASURY BONDS 6.906 9.035 AAA 146.656 4,029,030.31 1.43
912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 AAA 3,666,400.00 1.24
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 3.512 8.375 SAA3 97.909 2,151,250.00 .I6
542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/20/93 A- 1,958,180.00 .66
977,983.10 WMP/RUNTODN PAIGE 0000-111SO 7.684 9.663 AAA 97.828 951,742.53 .33
30299BG23 7.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 956:742.53 .32
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.538 6.067 259,862,253.39 100.00
255,159,706.77 86.19
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL 4.491 5.932 300.747.317.61 100.00
296,044,730.99 100.00
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSO00010000 01-NOV-1999 -30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR OCT 02-Nov-1999 -6.80
NA9123459 0.00
CW 02-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR OCT 02-Nov-1999 -6,80
NA9123459 0.00
CW 02-Nov-1999 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 30-Nov-1999 -0.85
99364FS12 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 30-Nov-1999 0.00
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-Oc1-1999 499,786.25
313588NV3 MAT 11/04/1999 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
20,52L97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 -20.521.97
996095247 01-Nov-1999 20.521.97
B 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/IASS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
20.521.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 -20,521.97
996095247 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10,992.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-1999 -10,992.09
996095247 02-Nov-1999 10,"2.09
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10,992.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-N0v-1999 -10,992.09
996085247 02-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 02-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.543.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-1999 -1,543.20
996095247 02-No,1999 1,543.20
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,543.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-1999 -1,543.20
996085247 02-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 02-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Nov-1999 -1,989,001.11
313396QH9 MAT 12/10/1999 02-Nov-1999 1,989,001.11
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Nov-1999 -1,989,001.11
313396QH9 MAT 12/10/1999 02-Nov-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 02-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-7999 11:04:44 &x cwt. Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,810.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-1999 -13,810.94
996085247 03-Nov-1999 13,910.94
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,810.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-1999 -13,810.94
996085247 03-Nov-1999 0.00
PC 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,968.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-1999 -6,868.08
996085247 03-Nov-1999 6,868.09
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,868.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-1999 -6.868.09
996085247 03-Nov-1999 0.00
PC 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
903,000.00 NIKE INC DISC 03-Nov-1999 -899,612.92
6541D3Z66 12/W1999 03-Nov-1999 898,612.92
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
903,000.00 NIKE INC DISC 03-Nov-1999 -898,612.92
6541D3Z66 12/06/1999 03-Nov-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,00o.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Nov-1999 -0%,519.00
313588QNS MAT 12/15/1999 03-Nov-1999 894,519.00
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 HveculNe Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSGOWI0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINB.OSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Nov-1999 -894,519.00
313588QN8 MAT 12/15/19" 03-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,605.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-1999 -2,605.00
996095247 04-Nov-1999 Z605.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,605.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-1999 -2,605.00
996085247 04-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov4999 ♦97,395.00
313396QH9 MAT 12/10/1999 04-Nov-1999 497,395.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-1999 -497,395.00
313396QH9 MAT 12/10119" 04-Nov-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,500,000.00 HEINZ H I CO DISC 04-Nov-1999 -M454,166.66
42307KYV3 1129/1999 04-Nov-1999 12,454,166.66
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,500,000.00 HEINZ H I CO DISC 04-Nov-1999 .12,454,166.66
42307KYV3 1129/1999 04-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MORGANI P SECS-FIXED INCO 04-Nov-1999 0.00
07-De,1999 11:04:44 E,ec.i ve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-1999 -9,255,594.75
313396QE6 MAT 12/07/1999 04-Nov-1999 9,255,594.75
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY O.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-No,1999 -9,255,584.75
313396QE6 MAT 12/07/1999 04-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,400,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 08-Nov-1999 -6,376,577.78
02225BZ37 12/03/1999 08-Nov-1999 6,376,577.78
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,400,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 08-Nov-1999 -6,376,577.78
02225BZ37 12/03/19" 09-Nov-1999 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 08-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,567.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Nov-1999 -92.567.95
996085247 12-Nov-1999 92,567.95
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,567.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Nov-1999 -92,567.95
996085247 12-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 12-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
924,062.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-1999 -924,062.88
996095247 15-Nov-1999 924,062.88
B 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Eeeculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
924,062.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-1999 -924,062.88
996095247 15-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,137.44 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-Nov-1999 -24,137.44
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 15-Nov-1999 24,137.44
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 PROCTER d GAMBLE DISC 16-Nov-1999 -796,790.00
74271SZD0 12/13/1999 16-Nov-1999 796,790.00
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 16-Nov.1999 -796,790.00
74271 SZDO 12/13/1999 16-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 16-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,829.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-1999 -3,829.00
996085247 17-Nov-1999 3,829.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,829.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-1999 -3,829.00
996085247 17-Nov-1999 0.00
PC 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
15,101.52 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-Nov-1999 -15,101.52
996087094 VAR RT DD 06(26/1997 17-Nov-1999 15,101.52
B 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Eieculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-1999 -30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Nov-1999 -896,171.00
369591ZF3 12115/1999 17-Nov-1999 $96,171.00
B GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC V-Nov-1999 496,171.00
369591ZF3 12/15/1999 17-Nov-1999 0.00
PC GENERAL ELECTRIC 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,700,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 17-Nov-1999 -7,673,199.03
74271 SZA6 12/10/1999 17-Nov-1999 7,673,199.03
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE PENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,700,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 17-Nov-1999 -7,673,199.03
74271SZA6 12/10/1999 17-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,488.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Nov-1999 4,488.54
996085247 18-Nov-1999 4,488.54
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,489.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Nov-1999 -4,488.54
996085247 18-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 18-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
15,101.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Nov-1999 -15,101.52
9%085247 18-Nov-1999 15,101.52
B 0.00
07-Don1999 11:04:44 Executive Wohbend,
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
15,101.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Nov-1999 -15,101.52
996085247 18-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 18-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
56,217.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-1999 -56,217.98
996085247 19-Nov-1999 56,217.98
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
56,217.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-1999 -56,217.99
996085247 19-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 19-Nov-1999 0,00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
40,065.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-1999 40,065.03
996085247 22-Nov-1999 40,065.03
B 0,00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
40,065.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-1999 40,065.03
996085247 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,140.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Nov-1999 -1,140.62
996085247 23-Nov-1999 1,140.62
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,140.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Nov-1999 -1,140.62
996095247 23-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 23-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Woekb..h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG06010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,126.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-1999 -18,126.71
996085247 26-Nov-1999 18,126.71
H 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
18,126.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-1999 -18,126.71
996085247 26-14ov-1999 0.00
FC 26-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Nov-1999 .12,800,000.00
993641`512 05.670°A I1/30/1999 DO 1129/ 29-Nov-1999 12,800,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29.Nov-1999 -12,800,000.00
993641`512 05.6705/.11/30/1999 DO 11291 29.Nov-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 29-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,841,015.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-1999 -12,941,015.15
996085247 30-Nov-1999 12,841,015.15
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,941,015.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-1999 -12,841,015.15
9%085247 30-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 30-Nov-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 953,125.00
OIN0626133 6.500%11/012029 22-Nov-1999 -953,123.00
BC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Eeecuiwe Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,00000 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 -10,494,375.00
OIN0626B3 6.500%I1/012029 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
395,040.89 GNMA POOL 00509944 04-00-1999 -376,523.35
36211 DP53 6.500%06/152029 DO 06/01/ 22-Nov-1999 376,523.35
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
395,040.89 GNMA POOL#0509944 04.Oct-1999 -1,497.86
36211DP53 6.500%06IM029 DD 06/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0,00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
395,040.89 GNMA POOL#0509944 04-0d-1999 -379,021.21
3621IDP53 6.500%06/152029 DD 06/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,596,21 GNMA POOL00471550 04-Od-1999 -31,068.26
36209GZP5 6.500%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 31,068.26
B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
32,5%.21 GNMA POOL#0471550 04-Oct-1999 -123.59
36209GZP5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,596.21 GNMA POOL#0471550 04-Oct-1999 -31,191.85
36209GZP5 6.500%03/152029 DD 03/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-De 1999 11:04:44 Fsecwwe IVorkbe.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
572,457.41 GNMA POOL80464503 04-Ou-1999 -545,623.47
36208YAC3 6.500%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 545,623.47
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
572,457.41 GNMA POOL80464503 04-Oct-1999 -2,170.57
36208YAC3 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
572,457.41 GNMA POOL80464503 04-Oc1-1999 -547,794.04
36208YAC3 6.500'/.01/152029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 12-Oct-1999 9,968,437.50
OIN0626113 6.500%11/152028 22-Nov-1999 -9,968,437.50
BC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
359,169.30 GNMA POOLM0495869 12-Oct-1999 -340,986.54
3621DL2AO 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 340,986.54
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
359,169.50 GNMA POOLA0495869 12-Oct-1999 -1,361.85
362101.20 6.5005/01/152029DD01/OU 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
359,169.50 GNMA POOL#0495869 12-Oct-1999 -342,348.39
3621OL2AO 6.500'/.01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dee-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workb r.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,566.27 GNMA POOL90495894 12-Oct-1999 -570,162.60
362101,3117 6.500Yo01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 570,162.60
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,566.27 GNMA POOL#0495894 12-Oct-1999 -2,277.15
362101,317 6.500%01/152029DD01/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,566.27 GNMA POOL#0495894 12-Oct-1999 -572,439.75
3621OL3117 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
206,934.41 GNMA POOL#0496128 12-Oct-1999 -196,458.36
36210MD99 6.500Ye01/152029DD01/OI/ 22-Nov-1999 196,458.36
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
206,934.41 GNMA POOL#0496128 12-Oct-1999 -784.63
36210MD99 6.500%01/152029DD01/OI/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
206,934.41 GNMA POOL#0496128 12-0ct-1999 -197,242.99
36210MD99 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
282,236.96 GNMA POOL#0496137 12-OM-1999 -267,948.62
36210ME16 6.500%01/152029DDOi/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 267,948.62
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
07-Dec-1999 /1:04:44 Executive IVo kkwh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
292,236.86 GNMA POOL80496137 12-Oct-1999 -1,070.15
36210MEJ6 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
292,236.86 GNMA POOL80496137 12-Oct-1999 -269,018.77
36210ME36 6.500%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
559,369.80 GNMA POOL80496200 12-Oct-1999 -531,051.70
36210MGH8 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 531,051.70
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
559,369.90 GNMA POOL80496200 12-Oct-1999 -2,120.94
36210MGH8 6.5000/03/152029 DO 03/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
559,369.80 GNMA POOL90496200 12-Oct-1999 -533,172.64
36210MGH8 6.5W%O3/15/2029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
362,313.13 GNMA POOL80496960 12-Oc1-1999 -343,971.03
36210NB57 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 343,971.03
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
362,313.13 GNMA POOL80496960 12-Oct-1999 -1,373.77
36210NB57 6.500%02/152029 DO 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAVULOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
362,313.13 GNMA POOL80496960 12.Oc1.1999 -345,344.80
362IONB57 6.500%02IM029 DO 02101/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,427.27 GNMA POOLB0497525 12-0d-1999 -439,016.89
36210NVS5 6.500%01/152029DD01101/ 22-Nov-1999 439,016,89
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PBACO
462,427.27 GNMA POOL80497525 12-Od-1999 .1.753.37
36210NVS5 6.500%01/152029 DO 011011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
111 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,427.27 GNMA POOL 00497525 12-Oe61999 440,770.26
36210NVS5 6.500%01/152029 DD 0001/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC.NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
359.494.36 GNMA POOL90469883 12-On-1999 -340,345.58
36209ESUI 6.50ML 01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 340,345.58
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
359,494.36 GNMA POOL 90469993 12-Oc1-1999 .1,359.29
36209E6UI 6.500%01/15/2029 DD OIPoI/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
III 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
358.494.36 GNMA POOLA0469883 12-W-1999 -341,704.87
36209E6111 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 Em dw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-19"-30-NOV-1"9
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
651,041.21 GNMA POOL 90469986 12.Oct-1999 ,618,082.25
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029 DO 011011 22-Nov-099 618,082.25
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
651,041.21 GNMA POOLN0469886 12-Od-1999 -2,468.53
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
651.041.21 GNMA POOL 40469896 12-0ct-1999 -620,550.79
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/0U 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
564,555.13 GNMA POOL 00469892 12-OU-1999 -535,974.53
36209E7D8 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 535,974.53
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC MG NEW VOR 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
564,555.13 GNMA POOL40469892 12-Oc1-1999 -2,140.60
36209E7D8 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
564.555.13 GNMA POOLN0469892 12-Oct-1999 -538,115.13
36209E7D8 6.500%01/152029DDOIPoI/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
58,972.58 GNMA POOLN0458988 12-Oct-1999 -55,892.16
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029 DD 01N01/ 22-Nov-1999 55,892.16
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
07-Dm 1999 11,04.44 am,ty Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SNARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
58,972.58 GNMA POOL80458988 12-Oct-1999 -223.23
36208R2V5 6.5W/o01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
58,872.58 GNMA POOL80458988 12-Oc1-1999 -56,115.39
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DD01/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
402,580.30 GNMA POOL80458995 12.Oc1.1999 -382,199.67
36208R3C6 6.500Ya02/152029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 382,199.67
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
402,580.30 GNMA POOL N0458995 12-Oct-1999 -1,526.45
36208R3C6 6.500%0211312029 DO 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
402,390.30 GNMA POOL80458995 12-Oct-1999 -383,726.12
36208R3C6 6.5000%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
496,005.40 GNMA POOL80465274 12-Oct-1999 -470,895.13
36208Y2F5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 470,895.13
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
496,005.40 GNMA POOL#0465274 12-Oct-1999 -1,880.69
36208Y2F5 6.500%03/15/2029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Erecurm Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
496,005.40 ONMA POOL80465274 12.Oct-1999 -472,775.82
36208Y2F5 6.500%03/152029 DO 03101/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC MG NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
178,720.23 ONMA. POOLN0434219 12.Oct-1999 -169,672.52
36207KK82 6.500%03/152029 DO 03101/ 22-Nov-1999 169,672.52
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
178,720.23 GNMA POOL80434219 12.Oct-1999 -677.65
36207KK82 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
178,720.23 ONMA POOL80434219 12.Oc1.1999 -170,350.17
36207KK82 6.500%031M029 DO 0N011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC MC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
879.834.20 ONMA POOL40466454 12.Oct-1999 -935,292.59
36209BE38 6.500%03/1512029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 835,292.59
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
879,834.20 ONMA POOL80466454 12-Oct-1999 -3,336.04
36209BE38 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
I 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
879,834.20 ONMA POOL80466454 12.Oct-1999 -838,628.63
36209BE38 6.500%03/152029 DO 03101/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
393,762.77 GNMA POOL 80468574 12-Oct-1999 -364,334.79
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 364,334.78
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC MC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
393,762.77 GNMA POOLT0468574 12-Oct-1999 -1,455.10
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
383,762.77 GNMA POOL80468574 12-Oct-1999 -365,789.88
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,765.30 GNMA POOLk0498342 12-0ct-1999 -31,106.56
3621OPS70 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 31,106.56
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,765.30 GNMA POOL#0498342 12-0c1-1999 .124.24
36210PS70 6.500%02/152029 DD 02/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32,765.30 GNMA POOLB0498342 12-Oct-1999 -31.230.80
3621OPS70 6.500%02/152029 DO 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
399,334.49 GNMA POOL#0498342 12-0ct-1999 -379,118.13
3621OPS70 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 22-Nov-1999 379,119.18
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC NEW YOR 0.00
07-Dee-1999 I1:04.44 Execwive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
399,334.49 GNMA POOL#0498342 12-Oct-1999 -1,514.14
3621OPS70 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
399,334.49 GNMA POOL#0498342 12-Oct-1999 -380,632.32
36210PS70 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
616,137.93 GNMA POOL#0499497 12-Oct-1999 -584,945.95
36210Q3E0 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 584,945.95
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
616,137.93 GNMA POOL60499497 12-Oct-1999 -2,336.19
36210Q3E0 6.500^/a01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
616,137.93 GNMA POOL#0499497 12-Oct-1999 -587,292.14
3621OQ3EO 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE RK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
233,596.52 GNMA POOL#0499521 12-Oct-1999 -221,770.70
3621OQ4E9 6.500%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 221,770.70
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
233,596.52 GNMA POOL#0499521 12-Oct-1999 -885.72
1621OQ4E9 6.501.01/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nw-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
07-Dec-/999 /I:04:44 Etecmive Workbench
Q _ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSOo0010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATFJ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
233,596.52 GNMA POOL 80499521 12-Oct-1999 -222,656.42
36210Q4E9 6."MOI/15/2029DD02PoI/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
637,587.62 GNMA FOOL N0499558 12.Oct-1999 -605,309.75
36210Q5T5 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 605,309.75
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
637.587.62 GNMA POOL80499558 12-Oct-1999 -2,417.52
36210QSTS 6.500%02/15/2029 DD 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
637,397.62 GNMA POOL40499558 12.Oct-1999 -607,727.27
36210QSTS 6.500%02/15/2029 DD 02J01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,563.92 GNMA POOL N0312997 12-On-1999 -439,146.62
3621IG3E1 6.500%07/152029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 439,146.62
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,563.92 GNMA POOLM0512997 12-00-19" -1,733.89
3621103EI 6.50D%07/152029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,563.92 GNMA POOL N0512997 12-0a-1999 440,900.51
3621IG3EI 6.500%07/152029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07.Dec-1999 11:04:44 Eeeeutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OC G00010000 01-NOV-1999 -30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
499,999.02 GNMA POOL80514314 12-Oct-1999 -474,696.57
362111K30 6.500%07/152029 DO 07/011 22-Nov-1999 474,696.57
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
499,999.02 GNMA POOLN0514314 12.Oct-1999 -1,895.93
36211JK30 6.500%07/152029DD07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
ID 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
499,999.02 GNMA POOLN0514314 12.00-1999 -476,582.40
3621lIK30 6.500%07/152029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
74,909.52 GNMA POOL80483340 12-Oct-1999 -71,117.23
36209V4Z4 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 71,117.23
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC MC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
74,909.52 GNMA POOLN0483340 12.Oct-1999 -294.03
36209V4Z4 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
74,909.52 GNMA POOL80483340 12-OM-1999 -71,401,26
36209V4Z4 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
325,175.14 GNMA POOL#0496959 12.Oct-1999 -308,713.15
36210A5T0 6.500%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 308,713A5
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
07-Dec-/999 11204:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
32.5,175.14 GNMA POOL#0486958 12-Oct-1999 -1,232.96
36210A5T0 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
111 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
325,175.14 GNMA POOL60486958 12-Oct-1999 -309,946.11
36210A5T0 6.500%0 2/1 52 02 9 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
297,452.84 GNMA POOL#0488332 12-Oct-1999 -282,394.29
36210CPR8 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 282.394.29
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
297,452.94 GNMA POOL#0489332 12-Oct-1999 -1,127.94
36210CPR8 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
297,452.84 GNMA POOL#0489332 12-Oct-1999 -293,522.13
36210CPR8 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
61,193.95 GNMA POOL#0490379 12-Oc1-1999 -59,096.01
36210EXG9 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 59,096.01
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
61,193.95 GNMA POOL#0490379 12-Oct-1999 -232.03
36210EX09 6.50OP/o 03/152029 DD 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
07-Dec-/999 /1:04:44 Evecmm Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
0CSTJ00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOGDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/!JOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
61,193.95 GNMA POOL80490379 12-Od-1999 -58,328.04
36210EXG9 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
51,406.64 GNMA POOL80493482 12-Oc1-1999 48,804.18
362IOJFXI 6.500%03/152029 DD03/01/ 22Nov-1999 48,804.18
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC.NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
51,406.64 GNMA POOL#0493492 12-Oc1-1999 -194.92
36210JFX I 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
III 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
51,406.64 GNMA POOL 90493492 12-Oc1-1999 48,999.10
36210JFXI 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 1843cb1999 -5,734,375.00
OIN0606B7 6.000%11/15/2028 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS A CO,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA COFI 125 19-Oct1999 -714,915.63
11170116118 6.160%11/012029 23-Nov-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Nov-1999 -5,818,359.38
OIN0606C5 6.000%12/152028 20-Dec-1999 5,818,359.38
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 E'eculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocs0000l0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
GCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH DIST 04-Nov-1999 -715,400.00
IIFOI I6C6 VAR RT 12/252028 22-Dec-1999 715,400.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 08-Nov-1999 -1,992,590.00
345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 12-Nov-1999 1,992,580.00
B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 09-Nov-1999 -29,134.17
345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 12-Nov-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 08-Nav-1999 -2,020,714.17
345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/131 12-Nav-1999 0.00
FC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 12-Nov-1999 0.00
PAY UPS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
34,370.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -34,370.00
9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DD 07/151 15-Jul-1999 34,370.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
34,370.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I5-Jul-1999 -34,370.00
9128273AB 3.625%07/152002 DD 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 0.00
FC 30-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Ereeu m Wo kbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999 -30-NOV-1999
OCSIYCONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIMON/ SET"fL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
49,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -49,600.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/151 15-Jul-1999 49,600.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
49,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -49,600.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jul-1999 0.00
FC 30-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,755.59 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-1999 -11,755.39
31331717A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Nov-1999 11,755.59
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,755.59 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-1999 -i 1,755.59
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 11101/9 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 16-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
14.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Nav-1999 -14.50
3133TC695 6.324%081152032 01-Nov-1999 14.50
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-NovA999 -14.50
3133TCE95 6.324%0&152032 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 09-Nov-1999 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
07-Dec-1999 11 04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,579.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 1,379.97
996085247 01-Nov-1999 -1,579.97
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,579.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 1,579.97
996085247 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-209,751.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-1999 209,751.41
996085247 04-Nov-1999 -209,751.41
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-209,751.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-1999 209,751.41
996085247 04-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-76,577.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-1999 76,577.79
996085247 08-Nov-1999 -76,577.78
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,577.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-1999 76,577.79
996085247 08-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 08-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-Nov-1999 2,089,970.75
313396QE6 MAT 12/07119" 12-Nov-1999 -2.089.970.75
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
07-Dro1999 11:04:44 Erecwive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-Nov-1999 2,373.00
313396QE6 MAT 12/07/1999 12-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-Nov-1999 2,092,343.75
313396QE6 MAT 12/07/1999 12-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.24,137.44 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-Nov-1999 24,137.44
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 16-Nov-1999 -24.137.44
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,163,562.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-1999 163,562.56
996085247 16-Nov-1999 -163,562.56
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,163,562.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-1999 163,562.56
996085247 16-N0v-1999 0.00
FC 16-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,673,189.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-1999 673.199.03
996085247 17-Nov-1999 ,673,199.03
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-673,189.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-1999 673,199.03
996085247 17-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 17-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 1/:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.15,101.52 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCF I8-Nov-1999 15,101.52
996087094 VAR RT DD 0626/1997 18-Nov-1999 -15,101.52
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-270,778.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-1999 270,778.38
996085247 29-Nov.1999 -270.778.38
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-270,779.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-1999 270,778.38
996085247 29-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 29-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Nov-1999 12,800,000.00
99364F512 05.670%1 1/3 0119 9 9 DO 11291 30-14ov-1999 -12,800,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,900.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Nov-1999 2,016.00
99364F512 05.670%11/30/1999 DD 111291 30-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Nov-1999 12,802,016.00
99364F512 05.670-A 1 113 0/1 9 9 9 DD 1129/ 30-Nov-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 30-Nov-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Oct-1999 -948,125.00
OIN0626133 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 951,375.00
SC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 3,250.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 E<emlive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG000l0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-395,040.89 GNMA POOL80509944 13-Oct-1999 374,548.14
36211DP53 6.500%06/152029 DO 06MU 22-Nov-1999 -376,523.35
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY -1,975.21
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,395,040.89 GNMA POOL 80509944 13-Oc1-1999 1,497.86
3621IDP53 6.500%06/152029 DD 06/0V 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-395,040.89 GNMA POOL80509944 13-Oct-1999 376,046.00
3621IDP53 6.500%06/152029 DO 06101/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,596.21 GNMA POOL80471550 13-OU-1999 30,905.28
36209GZP5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 31,068.26
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY -162.98
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,596.21 GNMA POOL 80471550 13-Od-1999 123.59
362090ZP5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32.596.21 GNMA POOLA0471550 13-Oct-1999 31,028.87
36209GZP5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-572,457.41 GNMA POOL M64503 13-Oct-1999 542,761-18
36208YAC3 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -545,623A7
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY -2,862.29
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Ew .ufi Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-572,457.41 GNMA POOL#0464503 13-Ou-1999 2,170.57
36208YAC3 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-572,457.41 GNMA POOL#0464503 13-Oct-1999 544,931.75
36208YAC3 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/0U 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 27-Oe1-1999 -9,914,296.98
OIN0626B3 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 9,999,437.50
SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 75,140.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 27-0tt-1999 -1%379,531.25
OIN062683 6.500%11/012029 22-14ov-1999 10,465,125.00
SC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY $5,593.75
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-233,596.52 GNMA POOL40499521 27-Oct-1999 220,566.21
3621OQ4E9 6.500%01/152029 DO 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -221,770.70
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,204.49
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-233,596.52 GNMA POOL80499521 27-Oc1-1999 385.72
3621OQ4E9 6.500%01/152029DD02/01/ 22-Nuv-1999 0.00
15 OAO
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-233,596.52 GNMA POOL 90499521 27-0a-1999 221,451.93
3621OQ4E9 6.500%01/152029 DD 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 1I:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SCTTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-637,597.62 GNMA POOL 80499558 27-Oa-1999 60ZO22.19
36210Q5T5 6.500%02/132029 DO 02/011 22-Nov-1999 -605.309.75
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -3.287.56
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-637,587.62 GNMA POOL 00499558 27-Oct-1999 2,417.52
36210Q5T5 6.500%02/15/2029 DD 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-637,S87.62 GNMA POOLi0499558 27-Oct-1999 604,439.71
36210Q5T5 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nav-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-462,563.92 GNMA POOL40512997 27-Oct-1999 436,761.53
3621IG3E1 6.500%07115/2029 DO 07101/ 22-Nov-1999 439,146.62
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,395.09
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,563.92 GNMA POOLW0512997 27-Oct.1999 1,753.89
3621103E1 6.500%07/I52029 DO 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
462,563.92 GNMA POOLN0512997 27-Oct-1999 438,515.42
36211G3EI 6.500%07/1512029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-499,999.02 GNMA POOLM0514314 27-Oct-1999 472,108.45
362IIIE30 6.500%07/15/2029 DO 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 474,686.57
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .2,578.12
07-Deo-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
499,999.02 GNMA POOL80514314 27.Oc1-1999 1,895.83
3621 lIK30 6.500%07/15/2029 DD 07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-499,999.02 GNMA POOL80514314 27.Oc1.1999 474,004.28
362111K30 6.500%07/15/2029DD07/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-297,452.84 GNMA POOL#0489332 27.Oc1-1999 280,860.55
36210CPR8 6.S00%01/132029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 -282,394,29
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1.533.74
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-297,452.84 GNMA POOL40488332 27.Oob1999 1,127.84
36210CPR8 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-297,452,84 GNMA POOLM0488332 27.0U-1999 281,988.39
36210CPR8 6.500%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0,00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-61,193,95 GNMA POOL40490379 27.Oc1.1999 57,780.47
36210EXG9 6.500%03/I52029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -58,09&01
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -315.54
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.61,193.95 GNMA PDOL80490379 27.Om-1999 232.03
36210EXG9 6.500%03/15/2029 DO 03MIl 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Etecwm Wwkbenc6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRU'TION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIWLOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-61,193.95 GNMA POOL80490379 27-Oct1999 59,012.50
36210EXG9 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 O.OD
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-51,406.64 GNMA POOL80493482 27-Oe41999 49,539.11
362101FXI 6.50D%03/152029 DO 031011 22-Nov-1999 48,904.19
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -265.07
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-51,406.64 GNMA POOL N0493482 27.Oc1.1999 194.92
36210IFXI 6.5000A 03/152029 DD 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-51,406.64 GNMA POOL80493482 27-Oc1-1999 48,734.03
36210JFXI 6.500%03/152029 DD 031011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-359,169.50 GNMA P001,80495869 27-Ocb1999 339,134.58
3621OL2AO 6.500%01/152029DDOIAI/ 22-Nov-1999 -340,986.54
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,851.96
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-359,169.50 GNMA POOL80495869 27-Oc1.1999 1,361.85
3621OL2AO 6.500%01/152029DD01/OI/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-359,169.50 GNMA POOL80495869 27.OU-1999 340,496.43
3621012A0 6.500%0I/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-/999 11:04:44 Executive WV ,kbe h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DFSCRWrION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,566.27 GNMA POOL00495894 27-Oct-1999 567,065.93
36210L3B7 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/0V 22-Nov-1999 -570,162,60
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -3,096.67
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
- W,566.27 GNMA POOL80495894 27-OG-1999 2,277.15
3621OL397 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6W,566.27 GNMA POOL90495894 27-Oct-1999 569,343.09
362101.3117 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-362,313.13 GNMA POOL80496960 27-Oct-1999 342,102.95
362IONB57 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -343,971.03
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,869.18
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-362.313.13 GNMA POOL 00496960 27-Oct-1999 1,373.77
362IONB57 6.500%02/152029 DO 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-362,313.13 GNMA POOL 00496960 27-Oct-1999 343,476.62
362IONB57 6.5W%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 QW
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-462,427.27 GNMA POOL80497525 27-Oct-1999 436,632.50
36210NVS5 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/0It 22-Nov-1999 -439,016.99
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,384.39
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Wo kbexh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIKH.OSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-462.427.27 GNMA POOL#0497525 27-00.1999 1,753.37
36210NVS5 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4Q,427.27 GNMA POOL#0497525 27-0ct-1999 439,385.87
36210NVS5 6.500%01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,765.30 GNMA POOL80498342 27-Oct-1999 30,937.61
3621OPS70 6.500%02/152029 DO 02JOI/ 22-Nov-1999 -31,106.56
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .169.95
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32,765.30 GNMA POOL 80498342 27.OU-1999 124.24
3621OPS70 6.500%07115/2029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-32.765.30 GNMA POOL80498342 27-00.1999 31,061.85
3621OPS70 6.500%0 211 5/202 9 DO 021011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-399,334.49 GNMA POOL#0499342 27.Oct-1999 377,059.11
3621OPS70 6.500%0202029 DO 02J01/ 22-Nov-1999 -379.119.18
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,059.07
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-399,334.49 GNMA POOLN0498342 27.00-1999 1,514.14
3621OPS70 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11.:04.44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-399,334.49 GNMA POOL#0498342 27-Oc1-1999 379,573.25
3621OPS70 6.500%02/152029 DD 07J01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-616,137.93 GNMA POOLW0499497 27-Oct-1999 581,768.99
3621OQ360 6.500Yo01/152029 DO 0 UOU 22-1,1ov-1999 -584,945.95
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -3,176.96
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-616,137.93 GNMA POOL#0499497 27-Oct.1999 2,336.19
36210Q3E0 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-616,137.93 GNMA POOLN0499497 27-Oct-1999 584,105.18
36210Q3E0 6.5001/601/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-178,720.23 GNMA PGOLA0434219 27-Oct-1999 168,750.99
36207KK82 6.5009/9 03/152029 DD 03101/ 22-Nov-1999 -169,672.52
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -921.53
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-178.720.23 GNMA POOL#0434219 27-Oct-1999 677.65
36207KK82 6.50091.03/152029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-178,720.23 GNMA POOLN0434219 27-0ct-1999 169,428.64
36207KK82 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,872.58 GNMA POOLOO458998 27-0ct-1999 55,588.59
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DDOINI/ 22-Nov-1999 -55,992.16
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -303.57
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-53,872.58 GNMA POOL80458988 27-Oct-1999 223.23
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DDOI/01/ 22-Nov.1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-59,972.59 GNMA POOL80458988 27-Oct-1999 55,811.82
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov.1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,206,934.41 GNMA POOLN0496128 27-Oct-1999 195,391.35
36210MD99 6.5005/.01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -196,458.36
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .1,067.01
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-206,934.41 GNMA POOL 80496128 27-Oct-1999 784.63
36210MD99 6.500%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-206,934.41 GNMA POOL80496128 27-Oct-1999 196,175.98
36210MD99 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-292,236.86 GNMA POOL80496137 27-Oct-1999 266,493.34
36210ME16 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -267,948.62
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .1,455.28
07-Dec-/999 11:04:44 &ocmiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000lo000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINIL M
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-292,236.96 GNMA POOL80496137 27-Oc1-1999 1,070.13
36210ME16 6.500%01/152029DDOI/01l 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,282,236.96 GNMA POOL#0496137 27.0eb1999 267,563.49
36210ME16 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-559,369.80 GNMA POOL804%200 27-Oc1.1999 528,167.45
36210MGHS 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -531,051.70
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,884.25
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-559,369.80 GNMA POOLOO496200 27.OU-1999 2.120.94
36210MGHS 6.500%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-559,369.80 GNMA POOL804%200 27-0d-1999 530,289.39
36210MGHS 6.500%03J152029DD031OI/ 22-Nov4999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-651,041.21 GNMA POOL#0469886 27-Oc1-1999 614,725.32
36209E6X5 6.500%01/I541029DDO1/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -619,082.25
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -3.356.93
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-651,04111 GNMA POOL80469886 27-Oc1-1999 2,468.53
36209E6X5 6.500%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Deo1999 11:04:44 Exeanive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRR"170N/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,872.58 GNMA POOL80458988 27-W-1999 55.598.59
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DDOINI/ 22-Nov-1999 -55,892.16
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -303.57
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-59,872.59 GNMA POOL80458988 27-00-1999 22323
36208R2V5 6.500%01/152029DDOINI/ 22-Nov-I999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,872.58 GNMA POOL40458988 27-W-1999 55.811.92
36208RIV5 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-206,934.41 GNMA POOL80496128 27-Oc1-1999 195,391.35
3621OMD99 6.500%01/152029DD0Il0I/ 22-Nov-1999 -196,45&36
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,D67.01
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-206,934.41 GNMA POOLB0496128 27-Od-1999 794.63
3621OMD99 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,206,934.41 GNMA POOLY0496128 27.OU-1999 196,175.98
3621OMD99 6.500%01/152029DDOI/Ol/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-282,236.86 GNMA POOL804%131 27-Oct1999 266,493.34
36210ME16 6.500%OVW029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -267,948.62
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,455.28
07-21e 4999 1I:04,44 Executive Workbench
Q F ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,292,236.86 GNMA POOL80496137 27-0ct-1999 1,070.15
36210ME36 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-282,236.96 GNMA POOLN0496137 27.Oct-1999 267,563.49
36210ME36 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-559,369.80 ONMA POOL#0496200 27-Oct-1999 529,167.45
36210MOH8 6.500%03/152029 DD 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -531,051.70
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,894.25
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-359,369.90 ONMA POOL 804%200 27.Oct-1999 2,120.94
36210MONS 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-559,369.80 ONMA POOLk04%200 27.Oct-1999 530,288.39
36210MGHS 6,500%03/15/2029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,651,041.21 ONMA POOL80469986 27.Oct-1999 614,725.32
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -619.082.25
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -3,356.93
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-651,041.21 GNMA POOL#0469986 27.Oct-1999 2.468.53
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Dec-1999 I/:04:44 Eeecutfve Workbexh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG0001000o 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DAT& AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAUWI.OSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,651,041.21 GNMA POOLN0469886 27-0a-1999 617,193.95
36209E6X5 6.500%01/152029DD01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,564,555.13 GNMA POOLN0469892 27-W-1999 533,063.54
36209E7D8 6.500%0U152029DD01/0U 22-14 v 1999 -535,974.53
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2910.99
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-564,555.13 GNMA POOLN0469892 274)d.1999 Z140.60
36209E7D8 6.5011PA01/152029DDO1/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-564.555.13 GNMA POOLN0469992 27-Oa-1999 535,204.14
36209E7D8 6.500%01/15/2029 DD 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-74,909.52 GNMA POOLN0483340 27-Oc1-1999 70,730.97
36209V4Z0 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/0V 22-Nov-1999 -71,117.23
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -386.26
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-74,909.52 GNMA POOLN0483340 27-00-1999 284.03
36209V4Z4 6.500%01/152029DD0V0U 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-74,909.52 GNMA POOL90483340 27.00-19" 71,015.00
36209V4Z4 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDA7ED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATIV COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-325,175.14 GNMA POOL80486958 27-W-1999 307,036.46
36210AST0 6.500%02b15/2029DD021OI/ 22-Nov-1999 -3011,713.15
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,676.69
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-325,175.14 GNMA POOL80486958 27-0ct-1999 1.23196
36210A5T0 6.500%02b15/2029 DD 02/01/ - 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-325,175.14 GNMA POOL80486958 27-Oct-1999 30&269.42
36210A5T0 6.500%02n52029DD071011 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,383,762.77 GNMA POOL80468574 27-Oct-1999 362,356.00
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DD OI/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 -364,334.78
8 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -1,978.78
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-393,762.77 GNMA POOLOD468574 27-0n-1999 1,455.10
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-383,762.77 GNMA POOL80468574 27-Oct-1999 363,811.10
36209DQ31 6.500%01/152029 DD OI/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-358,494.36 GNMA POOL 80469883 27-Oct-1999 338,497.10
36209E6U1 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -340,345.58
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .1,848.48
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 Eeecutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 41
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsa000/0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-358,494.36 GNMA POOL#0469883 27-Oct-1999 1,359.29
36209E6UI 6.500%01115/2029 DO 01/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-359,494.36 GNMA POOLd0469883 27-Oc1-1999 339.856.39
36209E6U1 6.500%01/15/2029 DD 01/0l/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-402,580.30 GNMA POOL80458995 27-Oct-1999 380,123.87
36208R3C6 6.500°h02/15/2029DD02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -382,199.67
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,075.80
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-402,580.30 GNMA POOL80458995 27-Oct-1999 1,526.45
36208R3C6 6.5000A 0211512029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-402,590.30 GNMA POOL80458995 27-Oct-1999 381,650.32
36208R3C6 6.500%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4%,005.40 GNMA PGOL80465274 27-Oct-1999 468,337.60
3620RY2F5 6.500Yo03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 470,895.13
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -2,557.53
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
496,005.40 GNMA POOLW0465274 27-Oct-1999 1,880.69
36208Y21`5 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 Evecutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4%,005.40 GNMA POOLW0465274 27-Oct-1999 470,218.29
36208Y2F5 6.500%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-879,834.20 GNMA POOL80466454 27-0a-1999 830,755.95
36209BE38 6.500%03/132029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 -835,292.59
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 4,536.64
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-879,834.20 GNMA POOLN0466454 27-Oa-1999 3,336.04
36209BE38 6.500%03/IS/2029DD03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-879,834.20 GNMA POOLB0466454 27-Oct-1999 834,091.99
36209BE38 6.500%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 27-Oad999 10,379,531.25
OIN062663 6.500%11101/2029 22-Nov-1999 -10,484,375.00
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -104,943.75
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000-00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 27-Oct-1999 10,379,531.25
OIN0626B3 6."0%11/01,7029 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Nov-1999 5,823,730.47
OIN0606B7 6.000%11/152029 22-Nov-1999 -5,734,375.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 89,355.47
07-Dec-/999 11:04:44 Ementive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 04-Nov-1999 5,823,730.47
OIN060687 6.000%11/152023 22-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA COF1125 04-Nov-1999 715,856.23
IIFO116B8 VAR RT 11/01/2029 23-Nov-1999 -714,715.63
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 1,140.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA COR 125 04-Nov-1999 715,856.25
I IFO116B8 VAR RT 11/012029 23-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-60Q000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 9 TR 00538 10-Nov-1999 604,979.00
345402YKI 7.020%1011020DO DO 10110/9 16-Nov1999 -603,942.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 936.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600.000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00538 10-Nov-1999 4,212.00
345402YKI 7.020%10/102000 DO 10/10/9 16-Nov-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00538 10-Nov-1999 609,090.00
345402YKI 7.0200%10/102000 DD 10110/9 16-Nov-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I6-Nov-1999 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Wodbencb
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 44
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NO V-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
77,449.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-0c1-1999 -77,449.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01.Oct-1999 77,534.21
PDC 84.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-77,464.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Oc1-1999 77,464.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Oc1-1999 -77,548.72
PD -84.72
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-77,46000 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Oct-1999 77,464.00
3133TCE95 6.324%09/152032 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-19,99 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-44,411.10 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Nov-1999 44,411.10
3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Nov-1999 44,348.65
PD 62.45
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-44,411.10 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Nov-1999 44,411.10
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-135,653.59 FHLMC GROUP 805-0476 01-Nov-1999 135,653.59
3128DDQ55 7.0000,602/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-1999 -137,773.18
PD -2,119.59
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-135,653.59 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Nov-1999 135,653.59
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Ereculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsG0o010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,915.35 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Nov-1999 1,915.35
31371HU48 6.500%09/01/2006 DO 08/01/ 01-Nov-1999 -1,875.55
PD 39.80
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,915.35 FNMA POOLP0252703 01-Nov-1999 1,915.35
31371HU48 6.5009/609/012006DD08/01/ 01-Nov-1999 0.00
PC 26-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-36,990.40 GNMA II POOL#0090023 01-Nov-1999 36,990.40
36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-1999 .37,603.05
PD -612.63
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.36.990.40 GNMA 11 POOL 00080023 01-Nov-1999 36,990.40
36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DD 12/011 01-Nov-1999 0.00
PC 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-57,5%.83 GNMA 11 POOL W080088M 01-Nov-1999 57,596.93
36225CC20 6.375%06/202027 DD 06/01/ 01-Nov-1999 -58,856.76
PD -1,259.93
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.57,596.93 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Nov-1999 57,596.83
36225CC20 6.375%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 22-Nov-I999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
53,279.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01.Nov.1999 53,279.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Nov-1999 .53,337.27
PD .58.27
07-Dec.1999 11:04:44 Esecwa.Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 46
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-547.27 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 01-Nov-1999 547.27
302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 102" 01-Nov-1999 -535.39
PD 1 L89
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,480.77 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-1999 10,480.77
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Nov-1999 -10,480.77
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,490.77 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-1999 10,480.77
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03115/9 15-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-21,582.93 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Nov-1999 21,582.93
3935052Y7 6.290Ye 10/152013 DO 0826/9 15-Nov-1999 -21,592.93
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-21,582.93 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Nov-1999 21,582.93
3935052Y7 6.290%1 011 5 201 3 DD 0926/9 15-Nov-1999 0.00
FC 15-Nov-1999 0.00
MATURITIES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Nov-1999 1,952,174.45
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/19" 02-Nov-1999 -1,952,174.45
MT 02-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Deo1999 11:04.44 Executive Wmkbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 47
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC N 03-Nov-1999 896,201.00
313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 03-Nov-1999 ,896,201.00
MT 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 03-Nov-1999 878,069.00
38142UY30 11/03/1999 03-Nov-1999 -878,069.00
MT 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 04-Nov-1999 499,786.25
313589NV3 MAT 11/04/1999 04-Nov-1999 499,786.25
MT 04-Nov.1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 04-Nov-1999 6,571,928.00
03019BY45 11/04/1999 04-Nov-1999 .6,571,928.00
MT 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-1999 14,835,060.83
313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 04-Nov.1999 -14,835,060.83
MT 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,300,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-Nov-1999 6,269,392.50
26354BY89 11/08/1999 08-Nov-1999 -6,269,392.50
MT 08-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Nov-1999 894,435.00
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 17-Nov-1999 -894,435.00
MT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 /1:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 48
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
00c00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Nov-1999 1,694,714.41
369593YH0 11/17/1999 17-Nov-1999 -1,694.714.41
MT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 17-Nov-1999 5,283,645.09
74271SYH2 11/17/1999 17-Nov-1999 -3.283,645.08
MT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,500,000.00 HEINZ H I CO DISC 29-Nov-1999 12.454.166.66
42307KYV3 I U29/1999 29-Nov-1999 -12,454.166.66
MT 29-Nov-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP IST&REFM 01-Nov-1999 500,000.00
264399DB9 8.000%11/01/1999 DO 11/0119 01-Nov-1999 -511,200.00
MT 01-Nov-1999 -11,200.00
INTEREST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST&REF M 01-Nov-1999 20,000.00
264399DB9 9.000%11/01/1999 DO 11/01/9 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 6,271.73
996085247 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 01-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Execvlive Wwkb..h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 49
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-1999 308.22
996095247 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MIN WTR 00004 01-Nov-1999 32,550.00
73317PADI &200%04/302001 DO 04/21/9 30-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR#00570 02-Nov-1999 13,807.98
44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/012001 DO 09/04/ 02-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 02-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Nov-1999 47,825.55
3133%NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 02-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 02-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 03-Nov-1999 3,799.00
313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 03-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 03-Nov-1999 21,931.00
39142UY30 11/03/1999 03-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 03-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 04-Nov-1999 28,072.00
0301 SBY45 H104/1999 04-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 04-Nov-1999 0.00
07-1)eo1999 11:04.44 Exenrcive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 50
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 04-Nov-1999 213.75
313588NV3 MAT 11/04/1999 04-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-1999 64,939.17
313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 04-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 04-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-Nov-1999 30,607.50
26354BY89 H10911999 08-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 08-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 09-Nav-1999 14.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Oc1-1999 0.00
IT 09-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 13-Nov-1999 28,545.83
066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05111/ 11-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 13-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Nov-1999 65,563.50
81240QGW6 6.540%02/202003 DO 0220/9 15-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Nov-1999 308,750.00
912SIODGO 11.875%11/15/2003 DO 101051 15-No,1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 /1:04:44 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 51
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Nov-1999 165,625.00
912810D14 13.250%05/I52014 DO 051151 15-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.OD FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS IS-Nov-1999 29,061.67
345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 13-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
135,653.59 FHLMC GROUP 8G5.0476 15-Nov-1999 54,075.46
3129DDQ55 7.000Ye 02/01/2003 DD 021011 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
44,411.10 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-Nov-1999 3,271.32
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,490.77 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-1999 460.26
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/1519 15-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
77,464.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Nov-1999 16,746.01
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-od-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
21,582.93 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Nov-1999 2,554.51
3935052Y7 6.2909A 10/15/2013 DO 0926/9 15-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04.44 Eremtiw Wa kbexh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 51
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000loo00 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLJDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 15-No,1999 12,500.00
3133TKKU3 6.000%I1/152011 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 15-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,755.59 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF SER 162 16-Nov-1999 11,755.59
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 16•Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTRO06 17-Nov-1999 15,101.52
17120QESO FLTG RT 08/092002 DO 04/08/ 15-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Nov-1999 5,285.59
36959JYHO 11/17119" 17-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Nov-1999 5,565.00
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 17-Nov-1999 0.00
1T 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,300,000.00 PROCFER&GAMBLE DISC 17-Nov-1999 16,354.92
74271SYH2 11/17/1999 17-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 17-Nov-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 18-Nov-1999 4,488.54
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/182000 DD 05/18/ 18-Nov-1999 0.00
1T 18-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Executive Wmkbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-Nav-1999 56,217.98
370425QV5 FLTG RT 09/182003 DD 08/17/ 18-Nov-1999 0.00
IT I8-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
36,990.40 GNMA II POOL#0080023 22-Nov-1999 8,425.13
36225CAZ9 6.125%1220/2026 DO IWOU 01-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 22-Nav-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57,596.83 GNMA II POOL#080088M 22-Nov-1999 11,676.96
36225CC20 6-375%06202027 DD 06/01/ 01-Nov-1999 0.00
1T 22-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CfF T11 A6 26-Nov-1999 10,933.33
3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 25-Oc1-1999 0.00
IT 26-Nov.1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,915.35 FNMA POOL#0252703 26-Nov-1999 5.378.03
31371 HU48 6.500%09/012006 DD 09/011 01-Nov-1999 0.00
1T 26-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 29-Nov-1999 29,221.62
345397SCB FLTG FIT 09272006 DO 0827/ 27-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 29-Nov-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
12,500,000.00 HEINZ H I CO DISC 29-Nov-1999 45,833.34
42307KYV3 1129/1999 29-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 29-Nov-1999 0.00
07-Dec-1999 11:04:44 Ezecwive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 54
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-NOV-1999-30-NOV-1999
OM-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Nov-1999 39.000.00
912827Y22 06.500%05/31/2001 DD05/31/ 30-Nov-1999 0.00
IT 30-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Nov-1999 49,600.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 0.00
CD 30-Nov-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Nov-1999 34,370.00
9128273A8 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 07/15/ 0.00
CD 30-Nov-1999 0.00
07-De 1999 11:04:44 EveculNe Workbench
FAHR COMMITTEE Mel2 wngq a
9 TO aG.1O Dr.
AGENDA REPORT item Numbs Item Numbb
FAHR99-96 18(d)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: Extension of Professional Services Contract for the Audit of the District's
Annual Financial Statements
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the independent audit of the
District's financial statements for an additional three years, for an amount not to exceed
$42,600 for FY 99/00, $44,300 for FY 00/01, and $46,000 for FY 01/02.
SUMMARY
In February 1995, after a competitive selection process, Moreland &Associates were
awarded the contract to audit the District over the next four years through the year
ended June 30, 1998. The audit fee for the first year of the contract was for $38,000
with a four percent escalator each year over the next three years of the agreement
through June 30, 1998. Al that time, Moreland & Associates were not only deemed to
be the most qualified firm, but were also the low bidder. In February of this year, the
Committee approved the extension the contract with Moreland & Associates to perform
the audit for the year ended June 30, 1999.
Moreland & Associates are requesting to extend their services for an additional three
years through the year ended June 30, 2002 (see the attached proposal letter). They
propose to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 2000 at the same rate that
was charged for the last year of their contract, $42,600. A four-percent escalator would
be applied over the final two years of the extension.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Total all-inclusive maximum prices to audit the District's financial statements for the
three years ending June 30, 2002:
2000 $42,600
2001 $44,300
2002 $46,000
H"ftWg + Mkg� Ra %IMB Ap�
RMr.e: MW Page 1
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item) This item is not applicable to the current year's
J. O. Budget, but is to be budgeted each year over the next three years.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District has benefited from the services of Moreland &Associates over the last five
years. They have provided the District with a high level of service at reasonable cost as
their fees were the lowest proposed during the last competitive bid process. Auditors
often bid under the assumption that, after proving their competency and their ability to
deliver services at a high level, they might be provided the opportunity to extend the
auditing contract period. The practice of extending contracts for auditing services is
very common in local government and GFOA's Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and
Financial Reporting text references the use of auditors for a ten-year period although
they make no recommendations on this matter. Additional points to consider include:
• The Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 has just been
issued that will require the District to conform to the new Governmental Accounting
Reporting Model by the year ended June 30, 2001. Moreland &Associates
expertise lies in Governmental Accounting and Auditing Standards. Their
knowledge of both the District and the new reporting requirements would provide for
a smooth transition from the general purpose financial statements currently being
issued to the new basic financial statement format required in 2000-01.
• Moreland &Associates has developed extensive knowledge about the District that
would be a benefit to the organization through the preparation of official statements
and bond comfort letters as we go forward into the bond market.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Authorize staff to retain Moreland & Associates to conduct the independent audit of
the District's financial statements for one additional year for an amount not to
exceed $44,300.
2. Open the selection process and solicit bids from other certified public accounting
firms. Attached to this agenda report is a request for proposal to solicit bids for
auditing services over the next five years should the Committee choose to select
this alternative.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposal letter from Moreland &Associates.
2. Moreland & Associates' Orange County Client List including first year of
engagement.
N Hq tlulaWnEa�aN apenGa ReWR116W R:uN•pane Repwu111WAem 1NE�.Oa1
R-n d1" Page 2
MI COVE STREET.SUITE SBB
Moreland &.Wado"a&j,, 9 (�E9NP�R SCN CA IFORNb 926fi
CERnREC PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS SM RANCHEROS DRIVE.SUITE M
SAN AIARCQS.CA 92069
(M)T52-3=
November 22, 1999
Mr. Michael D. White,Controller
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92827-8127
Dear Mr. White:
In accordance with your request, we are submitting this letter proposal to extend our
existing agreement for auditing services with the Orange County Sanitation District to
cover either the year ending June 30, 2000, or the three years ending June 30, 2002. The
scope of audit work as described in our original proposal of audit services will remain
unchanged.
As you consider a one or three year extension of our agreement,we ask that you consider
the cost to District personnel in dealing with a new auditor's information needs. Also,
consider the greater efficiency, thoroughness and commitment provided by an
experienced auditor who already has a knowledge and appreciation of your systems and
procedures.
If you chose to extend our agreement for one year, the hourly rates and maximum fees
will increase 4% to cover increased salary and other costs. This will result in total audit
fees for the year ending June 30, 2000 of$44,300. if you chose to extend our agreement
for three years, the hourly rates and maximum fees will remain unchanged the first year.
Hourly rates and maximum fees will increase 4% in the second and third year. This will
result in fees for the three years as follows:
Fiscal Year Ending Maximum
June 30 Fees
2000 $42,600
2001 44,300
2002 46,000
Mr.Michael D.White,Controller
Orange County Sanitation District
November 22, 1999
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity to continue as auditors for the Orange County Sanitation
District. We would be pleased to discuss with you at your convenience the contents of
this letter or any other matters you may wish to discuss. Please let us know if you require
any additional information.
Very truly yours,
MORELAND&ASSOCIATES,INC..
Michael C.Moreland,Partner
MCMatf
• I M i OOVE SmEET.SUIT M
NEW W'RT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 9a=
Moreland &,daaocia4.d-, Jn&.. t9.9Iv1�
CERTIFIEOFUBUCACCOUNTANTS 570 aANCNEROSD .SUITEM
smM cos.CA 9ZM
QW)752 3
November 24, 1999
Mr. Michael D. White,Controller
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92827-8127
Dear Mr. White:
In accordance with your request, we are providing you with a list of the governmental
audit clients we currently serve in Orange County, and the year in which we were first
selected as the auditors.
Year We Were First
Client Name Selected as Auditors
California Avocado Commission 1979
City of Fountain Valley 1986
City of Fullerton 1990
Irvine Ranch Water District 1999
Orange County Fire Authority 1995
Orange County Sanitation District 1995
Orange County Cities Risk Management Authority 1993
City of San Juan Capistrano 1999
City of Stanton 1994
City of Tustin 1995
City of Yorba Linda 1986
We would be pleased to provide any additional information you may require.
Very truly yours,
MORELAND&ASSOCIATES,INC.
Michael C. Moreland,Partner
MCM:xf
FAHR COMMITTEE MetlnpD TO d•apr•
32-9-99 12-15-99
AGENDA REPORT Rem NUM 11=.N=b
_ FAHF99-97 •.f(� t
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomkc, Acting Director of Human Resources
Originator: Judy Bucher, Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(CALPERS) VALUATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve an agreement with California Public Employees' Retirement System
(CaIPERS) authorizing actuarial valuation to determine contribution costs to the
District if the District were to enter into an agreement with CaIPERS, for an
amount not to exceed $1,400.
SUMMARY
From time to time, the District seeks information from other retirement systems
regarding contribution rates, benefits and benefit formulas in order to compare
these factors with our current retirement plan, the Orange County Employees
Retirement System (OCERS).
The process requires an actuarial valuation to be performed to determine
contribution costs if the District were to enter into an agreement with CaIPERS.
CaIPERS performs actuarial valuations for a benefit/age factor of 2% at age 50,
55 and 60. We are requesting two separate valuations to be made by CaIPERS
for comparison: 2% at age 55 and 2% at 60.
In addition to pension benefits and contribution costs, the District is seeking
information on other benefits available to CaIPERS employees and retirees,
including optional health plans. Authorization by our Board of Directors is
required for CaIPERS to go forward with the necessary valuations.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The cost of each actuarial valuation is $700. We are requesting that CaIPERS
perform the two valuations for a total cost of$1,400.00.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Hem: Other Professional Services)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
XMq.MYprM�1F.W11FW WdW,1FIJ1e0GW.Os
Pagel
r
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
Leave the Orange County Employees Retirement System in place and not
compare contribution rates or benefits with CalPERS.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Contract of Public Employees Retirement System for an actuarial valuation.
Attachments and exhibits.
H%w Eh 98W AHWaa2N9aI HRW27 O¢
Rw YO` 99 Page 2
CAPERS
Actuarial & Employer Services Division
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf- (916) 326-3240
(916) 326-3420 FAX (916) 326-3005
September29, 1999
Reply to Section 105
Ms. Judy Bucher
Human Resources Analyst/Benefits
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Ms. Bucher.
Enclosed are three copies of a contract for the actuarial valuations requested. This
contract authorizes development of the actuarial valuation reports. To proceed with the
valuations:
1. Have an authorized individual sign and date each copy of the contract.
2. Return two copies (with original signatures) to this office.
The agency will be billed after the results have been forwarded. Please do not remit
payment Prior to receipt of the billing invoice. Your request will be processed in the
order in which it was received by CaIPERS, we appreciate your patience.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 326-3712.
Sincerely,
Debbie LaPerle
Employer Representative
Public Agency Contract Services
DP:db
Enclosures
PER3-CON-1 (Rev.3/99)
California Public Employees' Retirement System
Lincoln Plaza -400 P Street - Sacramento, CA 95814
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM ,
Actuarial and Employer Services Division
Public Agency Contract Services j
P.O.Box 942709
Sacramento,CA 94229-2709
(916)326-3420
CONTRACT
OFTHE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WITH THE
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENTSYSTEM
FOR AN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS STATED HEREIN
By this AGREEMENT made this day of 19 in
accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Public Employees Retirement Law by and
between the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District hereinafter referred to as
Public Agency, and the Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafterreferredto as Board,Public Agency and Board agree as follows:
A. Public Agency herewith retains the services of said Board to perform the valuations
required by Section 20466 of the Public Employees Retirement Law for the purpose of
determinationby the Board of Administration of the Public Employees'Retirement System
of the contributions to be made by Public Agency if a contract is entered into with said
Board which provides for benefits as described in the attached"Exhibit".
B. Public Agency will pay $1,400.00 to the Retirement System upon completion of the
actuarial valuatioa such fee being based on the number of membership categories involved
C. Any and all data and information requested by the Board from Public Agency for use in
compilation of this valuation shall be furnished upon request. The actuarial tables and
procedures to be used in the valuation shall be in accordance with the tables approved by
said Board of Administration. Board shall have sole control of the valuation and its
judgement in the determination thereof shall be final and conclusive. All work sheets and
final results and reports.the product of the valuation,shall be and remain the property of the
Board.
Witness our hands the day and year first above written.
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF DIRECOTRS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENTSYSTEM OFTHE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BY BY
KENNETH W.MARZION,CHIEF
ACTUARIAL&EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION TITLE
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM
yoIuufm Cmlw
JTAS-CON-eAtR".rm(t
=1 ERS
V Actuarial & Employer Services Division
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf- (916)326-3240
(916) 326-3420 FAX(916) 658-1586
MISCELLANEOUS
Following is a summary of benefits and exclusions which are included in all contracts and a display
of benefits and benefit formulas which will be utilized in the actuarial calculation for your agency.
Retirement law provides the following benefits in each contract:
Three highest years final compensationavemge*
Pre-RetirementDeath Benefit- 1957 Survivor Benefit*
Post-RetirementDeath Benefit-$500lump sum payment*
You are permitted to contract with PERS by category. This means that you are not required to
include Police and Fire and Miscellaneous. However,all employees in a covered category must be
members of the Retirement System unless they are specifically excluded by the Government Code
as follows:
The appointment or employment contract fixes a term of full-time,continuous employment
of six months or less.
Employees serving on a part-time basis where his position requires service for less than an
average of 20 hours a week.
Persons in employment which, in the opinion of the board, is on a seasonal, limited-term,
on-call, emergency, intermittent, substitute, or other irregular basis until the employee
works more than 125 days or 1,000 hours within the fiscal year.
CETA employees hired after July 1, 1979, if they are in positions that would otherwise
qualify then as PERS miscellaneous members (non-safety). CETA employees hired into
safety positions such as policemen or firemen are not excluded from CalPERS membership.
*Please refer to the CalPERS booklet.
PERS-CON-19M
(R,w. 1/96)
California Public Employees' Retirement System
Lincoln Plaza-400 P Street-Sacramento,CA 95814
a
EXHIBIT '
DATE: September 29. 1999 LOCAL FIELD OFFICE:
Orange Regional Office
500 North State College Blvd.
Suite 750
Orange,CA 92868
(714)935.2625
FAX: 935-2628
AGENCYNAME: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MISCELLANEOUS
MODIFIED FULL/SUPP
SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE NO
Effective Date
Exclusions
RETIREMENT COVERAGE
Formula 2%@ 55 Full
Account Code H4
Prior Service% 0%
Member Contribution Rate 7%
OPTIONAL BENEFITS NO
POSITIONS EXCLUDED FROM CALPERS MEMBERSHIP YES
SAFETYEMPLOYEES
LOCAL SYSTEM NO
Money Transferred to Employees Account NO
Employer Money Transferred NO
InactivesTransferred -NO
Retirees Transferred NO
PERS-CON-19M
(Rc,1196)
.=�PERS
Actuarial & Employer Services Division
P.O. Box 942709 -
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf- (916)326-3240
(916) 326-3420 FAX (916) 658-1586
MISCELLANEOUS
Following is a summary of benefits and exclusions which are included in all contracts and a display
of benefits and benefit formulas which will be utilized in the actuarial calculation for your agency.
Retirement law provides the following benefits in each contract:
Three highest years final compensationaverage*
Pre-Retirement Death Benefit- 1957 Survivor Benefit*
Post-RetirementDeath Benefit- $500 lump sum payment*
You are permitted to contract with PERS by category. This means that you are not required to
include Police and Fire and Miscellaneous. However,all employees in a covered category must be
members of the Retirement System unless they are specifically excluded by the Government Code
as follows:
The appointment or employment contract fixes a term of full-time,continuous employment
of six months or less.
Employees serving on a part-time basis where his position requires service for less than an
average of 20 hours a week.
Persons in employment which, in the opinion of the board, is on a seasonal, limited-term,
on-call, emergency, intermittent, substitute, or other irregular basis until the employee
works more than 125 days or 1,000 hours within the fiscal year.
CETA employees hired after July 1, 1979, if they are in positions that would otherwise
qualify then as PERS miscellaneous members (non-safety). CETA employees hired into
safety positions such as policemen or firemen are not excluded from CalPERS membership.
*Please refer to the CalPERS booklet.
PERS-CON-19M
(Rev. U96)
California Public Employees' Retirement System
Lincoln Plaza-400 P Street-Sacramento,CA 95814
EXHIBIT
DATE: September 29, 1999 LOCAL FIELD OFFICE:
Orange Regional Office
500 North State College Blvd.
Suite 750
Orange,CA 92868
(714)935-2625
FAX: 9352628
AGEN&NAME: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MISCELLANEOUS
MODIFIED FULLISUPP
SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE NO
Effective Date
Exclusions
RETIREMENT COVERAGE
Formula 2%Qa 60Full
Account Code 00
Prior Service% 00/a
Member Contribution Rate 7%
OPTIONAL BENEFITS NO
POSITIONS EXCLUDED FROM CALPERS MEMBERSHIP YES
SAFETY EMPLOYEES
LOCAL SYSTEM NO
Money Transferred to Employees Account NO
Employer Money Transferred NO
Inactives Transferred NO
Retirees Transferred NO
PERS-CON-19M
(Rm 1/96)
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Board
II/DB/99 12/15/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
FAHR9 W IM C- )
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Michael D. Moore, Manager of Environmental
Compliance and Monitoring
SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH CLOSURE
INVESTIGATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Final Report dated
December 1999.
SUMMARY
The District participated in a lead role in the investigation of the Huntington
Beach contamination that caused Huntington Beach closures during the summer
of 1999. The District incurred significant costs as a result of our due diligence
efforts in proving the contamination was not due to any of the our facilities
(ouffall, discharge plume, trunklines). The beach closure, which lasted from the
Fourth of July weekend to the Labor Day weekend, required thorough
investigative and support efforts that resulted in significant Engineering,
Technical Services, General Services, Communications and Administrative
costs. The level of District effort, overall costs, and cost allocations have been
summarized at the various Committee meetings.
The Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Final Report associated with this
agenda item documents the investigation of beach contamination from the
District's perspective. It explains the strategies that staff used to eliminate the
District's suspected facilities. Strategies included surfzone and offshore bacterial
monitoring, area sewer lines CCTV inspections, and an outfall dye test. Special
studies were also performed by the District to attempt to show that urban runoff
was a reasonable potential source.
The District has concluded that none of its facilities contributed to the beach
contamination during the summer of 1999. However, the direct link between
Huntington Beach area storm channels and Santa Ana River urban runoff could
not be concretely established, although circumstantial evidence was
encountered. The County of Orange and its Board of Supervisors are organizing
a watershed management plan and interagency task force to follow-up up on this
and other urban runoff issues.
KY ,ft�`F...�AHRBiNd.
Rs:l ,see Page 1
Copies of the final report will be sent to the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and others who participated in the
investigation. A copy of the final report's executive summary is attached.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Thus far, based on purchase orders and other data, it is estimated the District
has spent nearly $1.5 million on all efforts related to the Huntington Beach
closure investigation and Coast Trunkline siphon rehabilitation (Table 1). Project
expenses and labor being proposed for allocation to Revenue Area 11 include
the siphon rehabilitation, all Area 11 sewer line cleaning, and all Area 11 CCTV
inspections. The siphon rehabilitation and some of the cleaning associated with
the siphon project should be capitalized. The other costs to be shared among all
the Revenue Areas include the outfall dye test and general contamination
investigations (monitoring wells, hydropunching, urban runoff studies, and
surfzone and offshore monitoring). These general investigations allowed the
District to demonstrate its facilities were not the cause of the contamination and
suggested other probable sources.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
This is an information item only.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Table 1: Updated Agency Costs for Huntington Beach Closure Investigation
Activity OCSD $ Revenue Area 11 Capitalized?
vs. Joint Cost
DISTRICT COSTS
Coast Trunk Si hon Pro ect
Flow Monitoring Studies $ 18,06 RA11
Siphon Leak Inv.&Cleaning• $ 382,078 est. RA11 Some
ca nanZed
Siphon Debris Hauling $ 7,5 RA11
Diversion Structure $ 121458 est. RA11
Siphon Engineering &Retrofit $ 195.0 est. RA11 Capitalize
SUB-TOTAL $ 724.178
*Inc. Newland area cleaning
Vicinfty Characteristics Research
Ground Penetrating Radar 1 $ 9,7201 1 Joint
H.M ft pwMYFN1IKNNPWa MRMW..
RM ,wW Page
iffidft'60ble 11 , Updated Agency Costs for Huntin
Activity OCSD$ Revenue Area 11 Capitalized?
vs.Joint Cost
Beach Surveying 8 Hydropunching $ 81.00 est. Joint
Archived Dow Review 8 Aerial Photo $ 7.07 est. Joint
Talbert Marsh Study 8 Correlations $ 48.14 est. Joint
Outfall Dye Pro ect 9 82.389 est. Joint
SUB-TOTAL $ 228,32
Sewer efty1citill
CCTV/Clean Huntington State Beach $ 27,590 Reimbursable
Area
CCTV/Clean Lower District 11 5.928 RAI I
Other line cleaning services $ 11941 1 RAII
Sewer Repair Services for Slate Perks 20822 1 Reimbursable
Potholino beside Lines 24.000 est. I RA11
SUB-TOTAL 90281
Full loaded Sample Costs thm 11/8 93,17 Joint
Enchanter Boat $ 2800 Joint
SUB-TOTAL $ 95,976
2UKAdministrative Cogit
Documents Mapping, etc. $ 1 274 Joint
Accumulated Staff Time (thm 9130) $ 411,000 est. Reflective of Project
Phase[Joint+ RAI1
si hon
SUB-TOTAL $ 412,274
Other Agency Costs to the District
Outstanding Reimbursement from State Parks
Listed Jurisdiction
GRAND TOTAL FOR DISTRICTvill $ 1499,363
OTHER AGENCY COSTS
City of Huntington Beach $ 335,133
State of California,Department of $ 121,869
Parks and Recreation
County of Orange, Environmental $ 75,959
Health
County of Orange, Flood Control $ 28,555
PFRD
SUB-TOTAL $ 561,516
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS•ALL �� $iii�,OQQli8i68,
AGENCIES
HM ,ft peMa1FAHMFehRdBe AHRMWb
Rw ' m Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
Not Applicable.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not Applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Attachment A— Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Final Report
Executive Summary
DEH
H 1vq E¢
Re 1� Page 4
4
V
Investigation into Bacterial Contamination
at Huntington City Beach/Huntington State Beach
Executive Summary
The Orange y eat A ency's CHCA) Officer d a
onion of Hu tin ton tat Beachc�n Jul 999, d e to elevated I vets of total
coliform, feuI colifor an terrfCocci yacte that ted a fi gerprint
indicative of sewage nta matid CI c nlin ed throu hou the summer,
impacting up to six the ight mileeof late an cit beaches in Huntington
Beach. The ast section o beach was reopene on eptember 3, 99.
The initial beach closure triggered a three-month risk-based source investigation
led by the Orange County Sanitation District(District). Other agencies actively
involved included OCHCA, the California State Department of Parks and
Recreation (Sate Parks), the City of Huntington Beach, and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 8 (RWQCB).
In developing a risk-based investigation, the District and OCHCA primarily
focused on potential sources of human sewage that were in close proximity to
the contaminated beach area. Sources were assigned priorities based on their
potential to contain human fecal contamination and its potential concentration of
fecal coliform. This report examines those possible sources and describes the
investigation of each from the District's perspective.
Initial Investigative Activities
Several weeks prior to the beach closure, the District's surfzone-monitoring had
identified bacterial levels that were above normal, but within acceptable limits.
Consequently, water-quality testing was performed along a transect (picketline)
approximately one mile offshore. This testing evaluated the possibility that the
District's ocean discharge (Priority 1) could be moving onshore. The results of
those tests were negative.
Subsequent to the beach closure in July 1999, the District initialed closed circuit
television (CCTV) inspections of the Huntington Beach State Parks' sewer lines
(Priority 1), the District's Coast Trunkline(Priority 1), and other nearby facilities.
A small break found in a State Parks' sewer line was repaired, but the elevated
bacteria levels continued on the beach. In order to CCTV a portion of the
District's Coast Trunkline that dips 45 feet below the two power plant cooling
water pipes, the inverted siphon structure (Priority 1), a 265-foot portion of the
line was pumped dry and cleaned of debris. The cleaning took hundreds of man-
hours, and over 165 cubic yards of debris were removed. The siphon was later
downsized as an improvement project to reduce debris build-up. The CCTV
inspection showed that the siphon was in excellent condition and in no way
contributed to elevated bacteria levels on the beach. CCTV inspections of other
sewer lines in this service area (Revenue Area 11) revealed only one section of
damaged pipe (approximately one and one-half miles inland), and that pipe was
ES-2
U
quickly repaired. No exfiltralion from District sewers was discovered during any
of the CCTV inspections.
Another offshore survey conducted in August 1999 was performed to affirm that
the nearshor7ngthis
of th ccc Is in-se�v a 120= (Priority
1) was not the f th beach ntamjha on. N ne of the offish re samples
collected dur s rve d sinificagd(tl el vate of bact ria, while
several of th rr ntly monitored syrf�ene tatio s did.
Other Inves iTechnologies
With the integrity of the Coast Trunkline, the inverted siphon, the State Parks'
restrooms, and all ancillary sewer lines confirmed; the District employed other
investigative efforts to locate the source of contamination. State-of-the-art
technologies including ground penetrating radar, sonar, and infrared imaging;
were used to search for unmapped pipes or other anomalies that could be
transporting contaminated water to the beach. None were found.
The District also conducted extensive groundwater sampling in an attempt to
locate pockets of contaminated groundwater. Site-specific samples were taken
near sewer lines, in front of two trailer parks, and at an abandoned hazardous
waste site, but no elevated bacterial levels were found.
An extensive document search and aerial photo review was performed to identify
possible source sites from the historical records, but no significant sources were
discovered that had not already been identified and were under investigation.
The ocean water intake and outlet outfalls from the power plant (Priority 3), the
power plant onsite facilities (Priority 4), and the dewalering at a construction site
(Priority 4)were examined. None of the sources was implicated.
The Effect of Urban Runoff
After eliminating possible onshore or offshore sources of sewage contamination,
the investigation began to look at urban runoff (Priority 2) in late August 1999.
This source was not investigated earlier because the closest urban runoff outlet
to beach area where the contamination was first detected was nearly 8,000 feet
away. It must also be noted that as time progressed the profile of the bacteria
found at the beach changed. While high levels of total coliform, fecal coliform,
and enterococci were found initially; over time only high levels of enterococci
persisted. Enterococci levels disproportionately higher than total and fecal
coliform levels suggest a higher probability of contamination from urban runoff
rather than sewage.
In this part of the investigation, three-storm water pump stations operated by the
City of Huntington Beach and one operated by the County of Orange were tested
and found to contain very high levels of all three indicator bacteria. A study of
the channels and the marsh was initiated because these pump stations delivered
ES-2
urban runoff to the flood control channels upstream of the Talbert Marsh, and
that runoff eventually entered the surfzone.
The marsh study demonstrated (with citrus fruit) a water transport mechanism
from the mo h Talb �7ischaitergrsl
t h as of nlemin
However, be ause pu p anon re st ped the day efore the
study wasp rformed, t w ofsiblin bact the p mp stations
to the contaminated
b ach After the diyersi�n ba eria levels at t e beach did
subside. �,
The District also coordinated two other interagency sampling programs designed
to further examine bacteria levels in the water exiting Talbert Marsh and the
Santa Ana River. An overnight sampling event at the mouth of the marsh and
another at the mouth of the river were performed in September 1999. Again, the
studies did not show a direct link between a source and the beach contamination,
but some potential upstream sources were identified for further study.
$100.000 Dye Studv
Throughout the summer all tests performed around the District's outfall system
indicated that neither the 120-inch diameter outfall (Priority 1), nor the out-of-
service 78-inch diameter oulfall (Priority 1), leaked. Therefore, they were not
contributing factors to the bacterial contamination on the beach. In addition, all
water quality tests performed offshore indicated that the discharge plume (Priority
1)was not moving onshore. The definitive study confirming the integrity of the
outfall system, a $100,000 dye test, was performed in late September 1999.
The Impact of AB411
As noted earlier, the first section of beach was closed on July 1, 1999 and the
last section of beach was reopened on September 3, 1999. It was the Health
Care Officer's decision to keep the beach closed for this extended period of time
because indicator bacteria levels above AB 411 limits were intermittent,
unpredictable, and initially suspected of being from sewage. The fact that a
direct link between a source of contamination and the beach could not be found
also played a role in the Health Officer's decision.
Analysis of historical bacteriological monitoring data showed that if AB 411
standards had been implemented one year earlier, portions of the District-
monitored beaches would have exceeded the single-sample water quality
standards 143 times instead of twelve times under the old regulations.
Orange County was the first coastal region to experience a beach closure of this
size and duration as the result of AB 411 and urban runoff. This experience
demonstrated the need for interagency cooperation, open communication with
the public, and a strategy on for performing source investigations.
ES-3
Today, a task force of local cities and agencies, legislators, and citizen groups
has been formed to establish funding sources, investigation protocols, and
mitigation measures to be used as these types of incidents arise in the future.
The District i n in t surfzon monitor s eek.
9 e�eY
Occasionally indicato be eria lev Is exc a B 41 standards, a d the Health
Officer conti ues to p st t i idual tatio s. A ity stud designed to
examine the otential ran port mgchan' b cter a through the albeit
Marsh, sto water ann I syste a the Sa a Ana River has baenfunded.
ES-4
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
November 17, 1999, 2:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 2:30 p.m. on
November 17, 1999. Members of the Committee present were:
OCSD OCWD
Director John Collins, Vice Chair Director Iry Pickier, Chair
Director Norm Eckenrode Director Philip L. Anthony
Director Peer Swan Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. (absent)
General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alt General Manager William Mills Jr., Alt.
Staff and others in attendance were:
Thomas M. Dawes, Project Manager:
OCSD OCWD Others
Blake Anderson Director Kelly E. Rowe Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp Dresser McKee, Inc.
David Ludwin Debra Burris Dick Comeille, Camp Dresser McKee, Inc.
Wendy Sevenandt Andy Czomy Brenda Deeley, Nelson Communications Group
Doug Stewart John Kennedy David G. Argo, Black&Veatch
Michelle Tuchman Cindy Gehman Bob Finn, Brown &Caldwell
Jill Everhart Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers
Clark Ide
Judy-Rae Kadsen
Greg Leslie
Julia Norman
Ron Wildennuth
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting
held November 9, 1999 were approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Interim Proved Development Phase Budget
GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes presented the staff report and recommendations
for refining GWR System costs and alternatives. Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp Dresser McKee,
Inc., provided an overview of previous and present cost estimates and summarized the
recommendations for refining cost estimates and determining cost reduction alternatives as
requested by the Committee at their November 9 meeting. The Committee discussed the
discrepancies between past and present cost estimates. The Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc.
proposal, dated November 15, 1999, prepared in response to the Committee's November 9,
1999 directive, was discussed. The proposal estimated the cost of the work requested at
$302,100 including $179,600 of in-scope, in-sequence work; $48,900 of in-scope, out-of-
scope work; and $73,600 in out-of-scope work and rive to seven weeks were necessary to
do the work. The Committee wanted to minimize expenditures until the cost refinement was
completed and decided that the work should be done by December 21, 1999. Ms. Kellene
Bum-Luchl, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. team leader, said this could be accomplished. At
the December 21 meeting, the Committee will decide how the project will continue. After
discussion, the Committee took the following action.
Upon motion by Director Collins, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, with
Director Swan voting "No;' the Committee authorized proceeding with the work in
accordance with the Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. November 15, 1999 proposal and
directed staff and consultants to report results to the Committee at the December 21
meeting. Said report to identify cost reducing alternatives and provide a unit cost for
the produced water. In addition, the Committee placed a total cap of$400,000 for the
next month for GWR System expenditures, which includes the $302,100 Camp Dresser
& McKee, Inc. effort.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for December 21, 1999 at 4:30 p.m. at the
Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Me .gDae ToBtlofdr.
2115199
AGENDA REPORT Ian Numbe Item Numbe
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE ORDINANCE
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing
Ordinance No. OCSD-09:
a. Verbal report of General Counsel
b. Verbal report of Staff
C. Receive and file written comments, if any
d. Open hearing
e. Close hearing
f. Discussion by Board
g. Recommended actions:
1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-09 (The waiver of
the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present); and,
2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11.
SUMMARY
Last month the Committee considered and approved some clarification to Ordinance
No. OCSD-09 which established the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Program for
1999-2000. While General Counsel and staff were preparing those approved
clarifications for Board consideration, we discovered additional issues. These are
described in the attached memorandum from General Counsel and are highlighted in
the proposed Ordinance through strikeout and bold typefaces.
\MEmYYle1\y.OhYptlalMN.venEa Repv6\1%90urE/.peMa Rppv611$dPgrE II E¢
R.r..a, ermse Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY a
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has ,iot been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
General Counsel will present an oral report at the meeting.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. General Counsel Memo
i 2. Letter from Kimberly-Clark dated 12/01/99
Draft Ordinance
WonndaalM ftU2�e&eaN Aaenda Rep %IIM Board Agenda Reph11A M.11dw
R—. v Page 2
Full rton Mill
December 1, 1999
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Members:
The Fullerton Mill of Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc. ("Kimberly-Clark") has reviewed the
proposed revisions to the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (OCSD Ordinance No.-1 1,
11/10/99—redline, the"Proposed Ordinance"). Kimberly-Clark appreciates that OCSD
has clarified the Proposed Ordinance in regard to the obligation of existing users to pay
for additional flow and loadings—above the baseline. Kimberly-Clark has the following
comments and recommendations concerning the Proposed Ordinance.
First, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is a one-time charge (Section 1.2),while the
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is an annual charge (Section 1.2). Can
the Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge also be paid as a one-time charge,
instead of annually? During the past four years of rate development, several participants
have raised the question of a one time up front charge, versus an ongoing annual fee.
Kimberly-Clark supports a policy that would allow commercial or industrial users the
option to"buy capacity". For example, if an expansion invokes the Supplemental Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, a user could be given a single payment option (buying
capacity up front)determined by the District at the time of expansion. Kimberly-Clark
recommends that this method be considered as a payment option. The Proposed
Ordinance could be changed by the addition of language that authorizes the District
Manager to determine and assess a "one-time Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge in lieu of an annual charge." This approach is similar to the way many utilities
handle capacity issues, and could offer some flexibility to business while having virtually
no impact on the District.
Second, Section 6.E of the Proposed Ordinance states that for an existing Significant
Commercial— Industrial User("SCIU")"the baseline shall be based upon the discharge
for the fiscal year 1998-1999, or upon such other discharge data which the District
determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage
system". At the Board of Directors meeting on November 17, 1999, two options were
discussed concerning baseline years: 1995 or fiscal 1998-1999. As part of an ongoing
water conservation and pollution prevention program, Kimberly-Clark has been reducing
its flow and loadings to OCSD for several years. For example, Kimberly-Clark has
reduced its flow by 23%, reduced its BOD loadings by 54%, and reduced its TSS
discharges by 28% between the 1994-1995 fiscal year and the 1998-1999 fiscal year. If
the District selects only the 1998-1999 fiscal year as the baseline, the investment of
Kimberly-Clark,and others committed to water use reductions,will not be appropriately
recognized. To recognize the value of such flow and loading reductions in deferring an
expansion of OCSD facilities, the proposed Ordinance should allow companies to elect
either the 1998-99 baseline or the 1995 baseline.
WMbw .-C:%A C.oronretion 2(x1l Fnv nr»n,wPnrro Avwxm- F.11n,ton.Cdb¢m,»92631-5396 17141 773.75M
Orange County Sanitation District
December 1, 1999
Page 2
Third, it will be difficult for Kimberly-Clark and other large users to measure "the increase
of discharge flow of 25,000 gallon per day or 25% per day over its established baseline
authorization,whichever is lesser." (Proposed Ordinance Section 8.A) For example,
Kimberly-Clark's flow meter has as accuracy of+1-5%,which for our flow rate equals
approximately 75,000 gallons per day. A true change in the flow rate of 25,000 gallons
per day can be measured, but only over an extended period. We propose a threshold of
the lesser of 75,000 gallons or 25% per day.
Overall, Kimberly-Clark believes that Proposed Ordinance-11 is a significant
improvement over Ordinance-09. We request consideration of the foregoing comments
and recommendations prior to adoption of Proposed Ordinance-11.
Please feel free to contact me at(714)680-7401 to discuss further any of these issues.
Since y,
E ward J. oers
Mill Manag
EJB:kb
copy: Donald McIntyre -OCSD
Jim Wybenga- OCSD
Don Bankhead -City of Fullerton
Jim Armstrong - City of Fullerton
Gene Hill- K-C Roswell
Peter Lennon
Art Siket
ORDINANCE NO. OCSDA 1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY
CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
OCSD-09
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a
management report, including financial and system facilities needs of the District,
and wishes to reaffirm the policy of the District of imposing Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges when properties, either newly connect to the District's system
or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District, and to
adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this
Ordinance.
The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby
FIND:
A That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities
entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989",
hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering
reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of
the Predecessor Districts in 1989, identifying the required future development of
District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to
all properties within the District's service areas; and,
B. That the District has undertaken, commencing in 1997, a
comprehensive update and revision of the Master Plan, which was adopted
October 27, 1999, to hereafter be known as the "Strategic Plan"; and,
C. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies,
undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial
needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and
categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the
system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total
costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate
methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain
access to the system; and,
D. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted
Ordinances, commencing in 1969, established Capital Facilities Capacity
Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges' or "fees" to be paid
by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system as a financial
TLW:pj.#1 13037'11/1%9-CLEAN 1
payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the
system, and for future facilities to be constructed; and,
E. That the District's connection charge ordinances, included authority
for the District to levy an excess capacity charge upon commercial and industrial
users who discharge large quantities or high strength wastewater; and,
F. That the District(s) adopted a revised, comprehensive excess
capacity charge by ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, which ordinance(s) was
subsequently repealed November 15, 1995 pending completion of the Financial
Rates and Charges Report; and,
G. That the District on February 22, 1996 adopted a moratorium on the
collection of excess capacity charges until the Financial Rates and Charges
Report was completed and a revised Capital Facilities Charge was adopted; and,
H. That a final report (the "Determination of Financial Rates and
Charges Report"), based upon studies and reports of District's engineering and
financial advisors, and an extensive evaluation by an Advisory Committee of
industrial, commercial, and residential users of the system (the "Rate Advisory
Committee"), was prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors to assist and
guide it in its considerations for the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09; and,
I. That the Report has been made available to the public and has
been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of
law; and,
J. That following adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 on July 21,
1999, certain ambiguities and uncertainties were discovered, relating to the
implementation of the Ordinance. It is now appropriate, to insure ease of
administration and clarity of understanding by those persons and entities
governed by the Ordinance, that the provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 be
revised; and,
K. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance
will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and
operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the
District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or
state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities,
together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and,
L. That the properties upon which the fees established by this
Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection,
treatment and disposal system facilities; that the costs of owning, operating, and
maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased
TLW:pJ*113037.1 MGM-CLEAN 2
regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs
will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said
property; and,
M. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges imposed by authority
of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide
access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as
provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and,
N. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as
applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis
between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the
service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and,
0. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the
California Environmental Ouality Act from further environmental assessment
pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section
21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Definitions
1.1 "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities
necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing,
planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property,
construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair.
1.2 "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non-
discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the
District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use
is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence
at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in
the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The Supplemental
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 6, 7, and 8 of this
Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual
basis as determined by the District.
1.3 "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to
physically connect a property to the District's system, including, but not limited to
installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines and appurtenances to make the
connection, that does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and
overhead for the installation of those facilities.
TLW:pl:N113037:11116199-CLEAN 3
1.4 "Nondiscriminatory' means that the Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same
objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non-public
users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's
facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the
proportionate share of use of those facilities.
1.5 "Predecessor Districts' means former County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, which jointly
owned and administered the property and sewerage system facilities of the
District, which consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District, as a
single entity, effective July 1, 1998.
1.6 "Public agency' means the United States or any of its agencies, the
State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county,
city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political
entity, subdivision or public corporation of this State.
Section 2: Connection Permits: Required.
A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings and
structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system
facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage
facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to
the District's facilities.
B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose
Discharge Permit under sections 305-305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or as
amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service
agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless
the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the
boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency
authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit as
authorized above may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries
of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the
issuance of such permit.
There will be a nondiscriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's
sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained.
Section 3: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No
application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any
sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be
approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an
TLW:pi:p11 W37:1 IIIW99-CLEAN 4
established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit
issued which establishes the category of use of said property.
Section 4: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment.
4.1 Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by
this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be
required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within
the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the
requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and
prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within
the territorial limits of the District.
4.2 Upon application of any property seeking to connect to the District's
system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and
upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California
Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property
owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a
period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid
balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and
interest shall constitute a lien on the property.
Section 5: vital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts.
Every person or entity newly connecting any property to the District's system
facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the
applicable category of use set forth in Table 1.
TABLE 1
CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE
Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge
Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet
Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110'
Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675'
High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600' 3
' Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be
$1,820; and all calculations shall be on a per square foot basis.
'The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at$1,600 per 1,000 square feet, but
shall be incrementally increased from the present amount at five(5) levels, and five(5)time
periods as follows:
Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675 per 1,000 sq.ft.
Effective January 1, 2000 $ 900 per 1,000 sq.ft.
Effective July 1,2000 $1,130 per 1,000 sq.ft.
TLW:pl.#113037:11/i N99-CLEAN 5
Single Family Residential Per Unit
5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530
4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475
1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130
Multi-Family Residential Per Unit
4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275
1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910
Studio Per Unit $ 580
Section 6: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant
Commercial — Industrial Users— Definitions.
A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person
or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding
domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"),
or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or
Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to
obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01,
Article 3, due to having federally- or District-regulated or significant discharges.
B. An Existing SCIU is any SCIU discharger connected and
discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000.
Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective July 1,2001 $1,600 per 1,000 sq.ft.
A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office
of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the
District.
*Low Demand connections are the following Categories of users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking
Structures; RV Storage; Churches;Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and
other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories.
"High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets;
Car Washes; Coin Laundries:Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food
Processing Facilities;Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow Is similar in
volume to these listed categories.
—All other connections are Average demand users.
TLW:pl:ett3037:1 VIVO-CLEAN 6
C. A New SCIU is any discharger who connects and discharges to the
District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after
January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in
Subparagraph A above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or
BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU.
D. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Section 5 Table 1 above, is
25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base
use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this
Subparagraph E, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7 or Section 8
hereof.
E. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of
flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The
baseline shall be based upon the discharge for the fiscal year 1998-99 or upon
such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the
users actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are
deemed to be SCIUs solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste
Discharge Permit pursuant to Section 6 above, shall have a minimum baseline
established as follows: Flow — 25,000 gallons per day; BOD —150 pounds per
day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge
flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge.
F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge as prescribed
by Sections 7 and 8 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date
of this Ordinance.
G. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to
the SCIU of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal the
District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General
Manager, or his delegated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon
extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not
representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly
period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent
basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager.
The decision of the General Manager shall be final.
Section 7. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New
Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for commercial — industrial
use category properties, all New SCIUs shall pay a Supplemental Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS,
exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the following amounts:
TLW:pjJl 13037:11116/99-CLEAN 7
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
Section 8: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing
Significant Commercial — Industrial Users.
A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to
and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase
of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd°), or 25% per day over its
established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase of
either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day,
whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization.
B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the
following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section
8A above:
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
C. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be
calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the
User's baseline. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a
year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District.
Section 9: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures.
For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the
category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit
amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to
a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 that would be for the prior category of use
which was terminated and removed.
Section 10: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures.
In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to
which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category
of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the
District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set
forth in Table 1, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for the
prior category of use.
TLW#111W37]1HCJ99-CLEAN 8
Section 11: Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site
Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A
charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the
District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement
Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner,
shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a
Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in
said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still
in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3 and 4 hereinabove, established for
property connecting to said facilities.
Section 12: No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
is paid for the connection of a specific parcel of property. No refund of any
charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason.
The connection permit is non-transferable to any other property.
Section 13: Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge
of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing
baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying
the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 7 above.
Section 14 : Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to
all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise
deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the
State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies
or tax-exempt organizations.
Section 15: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the
remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons
or other circumstances, shall not be affected.
Section 16 : Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1,
2000.
Section 1 : Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-09 is hereby repealed as of
the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 18 : Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board
shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law.
TLW:pjV113037:11HN99-CLEAN 9
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held December 15, 1999.
Chair, Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
Thomas L. Woodruff, District Counsel
TLW:pgf113037.1 IlISM-CLEAN 10
STEERING COMMITTEE oa� To d.mDr.
u-.Ig rz-rsss
AGENDA REPORT Iem NumW Rem Numbe
n
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources
Originator: Judy Bucher, Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-12, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by
Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the
County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04:
a) Verbal report of Staff
b) Verbal report of General Counsel
c) Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-12 by title only, and waive reading of said
entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be
adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present).
d) Motion to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-12 as an urgency measure
to be effective immediately.
e) Approve Early Retirement Incentive Agreement with Orange County Employees
Retirement System in connection with Ordinance No. OCSDA 2.
SUMMARY
The Board has approved all Early Retirement Incentive Programs for each of the last
five fiscal years. During those five years, 41 employees have retired early. Five of
those positions were refilled externally. From the positions deleted or refilled internally,
the District saved or will save $9.2 million from fiscal year 1994-95 through fiscal year
2001-02. Staff believes that it would again be prudent to offer this program because of
the significant savings and accelerated attrition that has been demonstrated.
Staff has inventoried the positions where the incumbent employees are eligible to
participate in this program. We have concluded that, due to changes of organization
and the method of providing services, no impairment to District's operations would result
from the approval and implementation of this program.
At least six employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement. If this
program is adopted, eligible employees with a minimum of ten year of service and 50
years of age would be granted two additional years of service credit for retirement
purposes, provided they retire from employment between January 1, 2000 and March
31, 1999.
,tee=e,Mv�Id N..a.w IIM emb ewwn.onw,mwrnxax
A,.,� Page 1
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
t
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance
Spreadsheet"Early Retirement Analysis"
YNenWY1Vy.CyYpnC\BwJlyniGFtoa\1BWP O�perW R�porbllHiNn]I.Cril
e,A.,: ermce Page 2
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY
RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICT
EMPLOYEES, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 31641.04
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District has previously
adopted Resolutions and Ordinances approving Early Retirement Incentive Programs for all
eligible District employees, as authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04; and
WHEREAS, previously adopted Incentive Programs were, as provided by law, for a fixed
period of time, each of which has now expired; and
WHEREAS, District's Management has reported to the Board the desirability of
implementing a further Early Retirement Incentive Program due to the implementation of changes
in the manner of performing District services and the savings of money and other economic
benefits that will Flow to the District by the retirement of eligible employees; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that changes in the manner of
performing District services, and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees
retire early, will exceed the total actuarial costs of the additional service credit granted to those
who retire under this Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does
hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: California Government Code Section 31641.04, as a component provision
of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, is hereby adopted and deemed applicable to
all regular, full-time employees, by the Board of Directors, upon the adoption of this Ordinance.
Section 2: All regular, full-time employees of the Orange County Sanitation District
who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees
Retirement System, shall be granted two (2) additional years of service credit for retirement
benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular employment of the District during the period of
January 1, 2000 through and including March 31, 2000.
Section 3: The General Manager of the District, or his designee, is authorized to
execute any and all contracts or other documents, and to transfer all required funds to the
Orange County Employees Retirement System, in order to implement the authorized actions
provided for herein.
Section 4: The total cost savings resulting from the retirement of employees in
positions which are subsequently filled at a lower level, or when the position is held vacant for a
period of time, shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted to
those employees who retire, together with the related paid leave payoff costs.
z iw
r 1 1
Section 5: District shall pay to the Orange County Employees Retirement System the
actuarially-determined cost of this Early Retirement Incentive Program over a period not to
exceed five (5)years, and on such other terms and conditions as shall be set forth in a mutually
agreed upon written contract between the District and the Board of Retirement of the Orange
County Employees Retirement System,
Section 6: This Ordinance is enacted as an urgency measure to take effect
immediately in order to preserve and enhance the public welfare, in that the District has not fully
recovered from all losses suffered in the bankruptcy of the County of Orange in 1995, and the
savings of money through reduced employee compensation will partially off-set losses suffered
and incurred directly by the District, and whose full recovery is otherwise unknown at this time.
Section 7: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Section The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by
law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District at a regular meeting held December 15, 1999.
Jan DeBay, Chair, Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
ATTEST:
Penny Kyle, Secretary of the Board of
Directors, Orange County Sanitation District
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
wso-rm
TS46' ' 2
Early Retirement Amlyals
are rare
O Mawn AroadBaku N,,w n Eaw wm Nw Bnnuel Saul a TMM
ROM i 554. fia3 LDe19Gl Fa90fl CBVBW Q=3, tl�1®
&bMM 5y195 5.2B1 mm O o fl. II 10,W2 M,300 W.ID2 0.3R - 1M,BW
B Mpr 39195 AaXI 8g8M Debted 51,a02 - 1i,3OS 17,118 - - - 0.1 0
Bu04m fi�mini 51= 'AM%W4 Oelew 31.W - 8,797 a0.8W M,10
Fmmn00 Starer 391la5 50W WWI DBIMed 31,227 - 15,5W 2B,7W W.52< W.W1 W,W4 W,O W,Wa W,Wa 327,M7
Fweman Y3195 5,017 W,58a ONetee 31,7W - 12.3W 17,870 M.SM a9.5M M.SB� e9,5M M,SM 19.5M 327,718
McMMeld"p a9695 8.01) 2.2D1 DNwed 41,0WNIJ96 low012M 19.174 W.201 W.2W 0.3W W,20e W.2W 0.2M 380,627
9uNOM 80.85 Mopwm 2B.5W 3aI.8W 21N,7W W,30 1WOW 3738M 2M,1M 1W813 1W,613 1W,813 10.813 1,3W,01
Smbr Stwallmepw WMIS 3.61E 13.770 RAW 228W
HR AW 3RB,90 3.07 M,3M Dwrlm n,412 - - 11,091 21,9W M,3M M,381 M,Ma M.M1 M,381 251,BW
Opw&W 1/15la6 5,105 arm Dorm 45.8W - - 2B,W8 15.4W 61,2W 81.2m 166,051
Oper Super 1R596 5,105 81,2W NwNd M,787 - - 28.W8 22,173 a1,TB0 61,253 al.= 61,2W 61,263 W.Ml
m"Mw Wm 6.132 73,581 OdMeO M.TS I8,398 31,OW 73,SM 73.564 n.SM T3.5M 73,W 4x0.325
si.wwal 95B6 Ropwm 23,W) 2M.2M 169,231 NBC 0,W1 2a.M8 210.1W im..3W 179.m 179,2W 1.1W,00
&.0 trap. NIal6 51399 M,)W cello 37,8W W,BW 27.10 M,)W 04,788 81,765 M,7W 342.06
&.MMOOpwelar 3Tla7 4,231 5R777 13Me1M 30.2118 - 12160 20.aW W,)7) 50,777 W.777 W,)7) 236,2W
F.. NH97 1.651 W.BW RWW lntemey 33.314 - 23,2M 1208 W,We W,BW W,BW Wm 2W,2W
&.Cww1rlrap. =197 1,7M W.03 NIMM M,B91 - I4,2W 32.83E WIM AM
Opw Bupw VM7 5,M7 64,017 Rollo Nemelly M25/ - - - 26,805 2S.M3 64,0e7 Wall M,W7 M,Oai Walla
Melmwunw Mpr MT91 8,317 75,799 Delned 0.214 - - - 282W W,SW 75,7W 75.7% 75M 75,799 m0a)
Sr.MeM Oparww M71W 4.419 W,BBS O m 32.130 - 131M7 21,735 m.m W90 53,80 O.BW 2W,W3
&.Mbep . W70 S.W Wm Denbo 39,729 law M,871 W,SBS W,585 W,595 W,595 3W,01
DOnYr warolw 2nY91 4,01 0.527 minim 3i'm - - 13,M3 21,590 Nsal
taa6 MepeeMp 1Ita97 4,1W M.297 Oelmwd 2R1W M.501 19,W1 49,297 M387 M.3W M,297 2W873
&.Q Millar 2,788 M.a Rnilbd . 19,955 - - 09,9W) - (19.9W)
&.9,,o w1w 4,11♦ M,BW Re fled 29,737 - - - (29,737) (20.7371
EiwI ,Mw 97m ),tat W.BW RMlbd bbme0y S120 - - M.70 36,706 W,9W W,9W W,9W W.B89 423,M5
&.M.Mn. MIMI, 5.158 051166 Now rem - - te.m 26,118 Wpae W,MB 55.1B8 mm W4,618
Iran Twit ll mW a,2W 51,018 DNwaB M.02 12,756 20.W6 51,018 51,018 51,018 51,010 237,414
SUI90 lW97 Ropnm 0 20 785.1M 473,312 276,772 2)1,59/ 745,203 BW.471 BW.471 688,171 3,381,072
dM.ebpedalbl mini 2.08 W,191 D wd 21,1,18 W,114 - (27,240) 14.315 38.491 W491 M,M1 91578
Fiplmer mini 5.1xe 64.63a O m M,69a 49.999 (32,830) 27,7M W,01 W,891 W,Oa 30 m
FmNhc Awl U1798 3.m 47,064 Ratio WemeSy 28,W2 27,619 - - - 05,0m 19.022 OAM 17,061 47,0114 141,1161
Complbnoes mmu, VIM 6,548 79.W1 O w Mam 327M 31,761 78.W1 78,W1 78.581 3W.244
S k,Rhl W-M Pmglmn 19.1M 229.710 1M.9W 113,132 (43,192) Wm M.770 W9.710 229,770 7M,9W
Smwbw 7/5MB9 3,3W M.a29 RMIb0lM ally 24,080 aaM - - (12.910) 1B,310 43,429 0,129 54,258
Buyer 71W98 3.8M 138W RAW 3m - - (3,203) (3200)
IIE Tol,M n S m 4,516 S0.7W O wl 11,217 25.= - - - (20.3W) 23633 W.TW W1W 113,W9
C,,weliww supeout 373199 5.01 65,774 RMOea lMemaM M.1W 49,90 - (33556) 26584 0,774 W.774 124.576
Flmrn lTopOnl o 3latla9 4,328 51,9M O wf W,BM 19,899 - - - - (37.015) M,992 51.9M 51.938 W,W3
&.Opnwtw 39199 4,M9 W,BW Rolled inl Uy O.OM 49.990 - - (M m) 21,772 W,6W W.BW WNS
Sr.Opewlw 3la199 1,4W W.BW Rollo W.Ily 32.OM 19,9W (M,02) 21,772 O,WB W,WB 0,W8
Leo DMlwlbraW r mini 4,3M 52,OW Rowl W.Ily 31,111E 49,999 - - - - (W,9W) 21.WI 52,OW 52,OW W,118
Conmmalan lmpolor SO1la9 4,732 KIM Row Ma31 - - - - 4.i32 4,732
C,weOww Su .r b'11la9 4,9W W.WS Rollo MomeAy M.075 19,999 (46257) 21.2W W.675 50.875 W.6M
Suwwel 9aW Rupwm ".SW S 'nil 292,IW 378,193 (258. M) 175,2W 10,562 IM,50 70,721
&.Emir.S'awlid 79,99 5,03a W,a0.3 R011o .11Y M,9W M,9B9 - 5,375 24,414 W1U, 0.1B3
NMpw 7MW 31W 37.241 ReNol Woody 22.191 3a141 ls,m 37.20 W.M1
S t*, leSW prppwm 81W W.817 W,1W 49,W9 M,519 39,47 67,817 178,b0
yowl Cow 1.mm.818 511,92a
Nat Saw,Barin9a 65,2W 723,W0 8M80 70.0 98 M I,482,018 1.7M.2W 1,794470 ).618.129
Beim 6arinpa 18.90 58.10 1M.929 1M.811 197,90) 2W.10 318.OW masm 1,545.957
Tphl NO ut.,B B .oR SaHiga WIW 281.799 7M572 BMBW 1,187.70 1.778.09 2.O ..3M 2.15a1M ti185.
Fi R�