Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11-17 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 10, 1999 URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT PLEASE NOTE — CHANGE IN MEETING TIMEM phone: 17141982-2411 nailing address: 8127 FoacDin Valley.C4 NOTICE OF MEETING 92720-8127 addreasse Avenue BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 oure Ellis Av Due �unte1nVe-7 1CA 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92708J018 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1999 — 6:00 P.M. hasaesr DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Algorithms Of 10844 Ellis Avenue cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 Arsehom area The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation eras Buena Park District will be held at the above location, time and date. Cypress Faunas. Valley F �j UII Gerd G,ave en Huntington Beach Irvine BoAfd Secret Le Habra Iy Le Pelee Los Alamitos Newport Beech Orange Reactive eetingss SolAn Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming M Seel Beech Benton meth" STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 4:00 Wile Park Y� P•m• Y4r6e Linde County of orange OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 1, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, December 2, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts C"sto Mass FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 8, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. Midway Coy Water Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, December 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. lrvno Panch @OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 15, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. -To Protect the Public Heckh and the Environment through Excellence in Metewater systier" n BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting December "December 15, 1999 - January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 April April 26, 2000 May May 24, 2000 June June 28, 2000 July •July 19, 2000 August August 23, 2000 September September 27, 2000 October October 25, 2000 November 'November 15, 2000 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month N:Wq�]nOSA rdal1 Me NNofic WN9.2.d r AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 17, 1999 — 6:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 11/17/99 Page 2 5. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership(Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session It is the intention of the Board of Directors to resume the regular meeting at 7,00at p soon thereafter as possible. i 6. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel r 11/17/99 Page 3 B. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on October 27, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/99 10/31/99 Totals $5,666,282.86 $4,263,466.42 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Receive, file and deny claim of Mladen Buntich Construction Company dated October 11, 1999, in the amount of$1,157,188.00 for alleged damages in connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 17, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 27, 1999 to be filed. 1 vr7199 Page 4 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re November 4, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES- NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 4, 1999 to be filed. C. Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500. d. Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,764, for a total amount not to exceed $684,054. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re November 10, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 10, 1999 to be filed. (Minutes will be distributed at the November 17, 1999 meeting.) C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1999. d. Receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 1999. e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-22, Amending Policies Numbers B30.00, C10.00, C20.00, C30.00, C150.00, D50.00, D60.00, D90.00 and F80.00 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98.33; Adding Policies Numbers C20.10 and C170.00 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 98-33; Ratifying any Additional Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33; and Ratifying that All Future Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be Made by Resolution re Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for Classification, Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, Policies and Procedures Governing District Employment. f. 1)Approve plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates of Participation long term borrowings; and 2) Authorize the General Manager to execute professional service agreements with PaineWebber, Inc. and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the COP restructuring plan. g. Receive and file the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 1999, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. r 11/17/99 Page 5 h. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 9843. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re November 9, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 9, 1999 to be filed. (Minutes will be distributed at the November 17, 1999 meeting.) 16. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, adding a public health element to the existing public information program for an additional amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $275,895, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the additional amount of$35,500. 17. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-09: a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 2, 1999. b. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-11 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-11, and pass to second reading and public hearing on December 15, 1999. 18. 1) Approve an Agreement for. a) the purchase of the 1,808.15 acre portion of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kings County for an amount not to exceed $3,254,400; b) a three-year option to purchase the 4026.58 acre portion of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kem County for an amount not to exceed $4.545,600 contingent on obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air compost facility on Tule Ranch/Magan 11/17/99 Page 6 Ranch, or upon the District's discretion; and c) the retention of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a portion of the District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an annual amount not to exceed $2,540,000 for both Kings and Kem Counties Class B biosolids* land application; and, 2)Approve an Agreement with the Yakima Company that provides for. a) the reservation of 100,000 wet tons per year of capacity for compost and storage in consideration of the payment of$1,250,000 upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air compost facility; b) the ability to use the Yakima Company's land application sites for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at $25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees, by the Yakima Company on their permitted sites in Kern County during the compost site permitting and development period for an annual amount not to exceed $775,000; c) the ability to land apply District's-produced Class A EQ biosolids' for$25.00 per wet ton for an annual amount not to exceed $625,000; d) the payment of a composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton plus a prorated share of the annual permit fees for ten years at an annual amount not to exceed $2,625,000; and e) the acquisition of a Site Purchase Option to purchase all or a portion of the compost site for a price to be determined at the time of the transaction. 19. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-24, Adopting a New Employer-Employee Relations Resolution, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34. 20. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a.regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 11/17/99 Page 7 1. Status Report of General Counsel re proposed litigation: OCSD v. County of Kem, at al. (Government Code Section 54956.9). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Colich Brothers, Inc. v. OCSD, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 806799 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with District's Negotiator and give direction re all Employee Bargaining Units (Government Code Section 54957.6). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 21. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 24. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle 714 593-7130 HiM pall genda\Bo Agendas\1999 Beard A9er s\102799.dm The Ormtge County Sanifafion District •e' Budget Overview demands of central and northwest Orange County. The total the way in Orange County an the Sanitation District and budgetforfsevlyear 1999-2000reflea Capital Improvement Program(CIP)pmpwed ash flow the Orange County Water District(OCWD). Together,we are our continuing efforts to streaJn/inethe Our two treatment plants,located in fountain Valley and outlay for Total year 1999-2000 is$92A million,an increase evaluating a joint project that could be the largest water organixadon,reduce operating tests and Huntington Beach,process about 2SO million gallons of of 27.6 percent over the prior year. reclamation project in the nation. imreareoveralle choarcies. This rk budget wastewater each day generated by approximately 2.2 million people in moral and northwest Orange County. The fiscal Over the next four to six years,we anticipate annual Called the Groundwater Replenishment System,the project also reflecss one of the outcomes of our three- year 199900 proposed budget a operate,maintain and construction project expenditures from$75 to$100 million, would uke highly treated wastewater and,through advanced yeorstrategiep/ammngefforq anexpanded manage our sewage treatment and disposal system is S44.0 In order to staff this temporary higher level of effort, technologies,produce near-distilled-qualitywater. The water Capitallinprovemem Progrmn(C/P). million,a$1.2 million edutio,from the prior year budget. the Dinrict will utilice up to lS contract engineers during would then be pumped from fountain Valley,the proposed Approximately 200 Capita/projxtr Will be this period. These engineers will not be employees of the treatment site.to Anaheim,the location of Water District District,and she cost for the contractual services will spreading basins. The water would be allowed to percolate eit/eer in Chip/canning,design or construction be charged directly to the capital projects being into groundwater supplies and.eventually,pumped to homes p/ratetGafucalyear. TlieseprejectsiesuranJt within the Capital Outlay Revolving fund. Relying on highly and businesses far drinking and other uses. $927million of a$1.5billion capital mined,highly qualified contact engineen to augment improvement plan that=11take us through ss.- ssoa permanent staff will enable us to meet our planning,design The District has proposed matching OCWD funding for this the year 2020 and which dui/!prepare as to al" s°q° pen and(Education goals without increasing the number of full. project and has budgeted$122 million over a sat-year period. metthe gromingnads a ojourserviarea, s sp%� time employee. By participating in the Groundwater Replenishment System $ore s>n's ER and divining up to 100 million gallons of treated wastewater T/Juyearf budget also includes continued s4so \B7.. Water Reclamation a day,wehope to delay the need N modify our existing ocean iws90 Iso�9-r 1eel�c 1111-oo osu u still system or defer building a second catchall,which could participationrat the proposed Groundwatero,aem Lou Southern California,indeed the entire State,is taking a more East SISO million or more. Replmithment System,a water re/nmarron I focused approach to water resource management. Leading projetwe are explming in conjunction with The cost per million gallons of wastewater treated.an the Orange County Water District 1f industry-wide performance measurement,is expected to MEOW e e I roalttreased,the Groundwater Repla/uhmeat remain the same in 1999.00 as the prior Dscal year projection Sstem would take as much as 100million of$482. As depicted in the graph,the costpermillion gallons e.w���weuua,.. y mated was noticeably lower in 1997.98 than ineicher of the sez..00000 wnv., gallons a day ofhig/dy treateadmastemater •caw Birv1vi iizee+.000 cop No years preceding it or the two years after. this dip is $4ne9o.000 also,through reverse osmosis,mitrofiltration attributable to the IF Hides storms that occurred in that year, o ...m". t"sz�eze:tau" •••• andultramsyletdwaleremer,produce near- which resulted in a 6%increase in wastewater flows. s9we.47e,eoe ,s79sze.opo distilled-quality water for drinking and other householdura. K< Stmtegic Plan 43, How Revenue is Spent During fiscal year 1999-2000 the District will complete a We a"scow car year three of our Flue-Year Our revenue iupens an the cost e,providing wastewater collection,treatment and surpwal service,inducting employees' Staffing Plan,a course ofactionfor major strategiccicmitmints and iscusthat ill edefne ourgaals, salaries and benefit,debt service,our capital Improvements and the cot of self-insurance. operational commitments the nut and easodated financial dewlopinga more nremnlined,eJ�tient requiremenuforthe eat can years. Summary otireaemen4 Disposal EAdministrative Expenses organization. The plan relies on a tmriety 1998-99 vs.1999-00 Budget aJtoou,indudingibe imp/emtntation of plant Begun in 1996,the Strategic Plan miles manyof the 1996.99 1998.99 1999.00 and office anfomatian,training ma iatrtaringly assumptions the District had previously used to develop our Passed Budget Pml•ca•a Appromed nuaaet ve/Optit)e mOrkfOrLe,andsioning-g existing planning document. We worked with the 23 cities salulea and Wager 531.173.MO 633.D5,200 $32,123,300 in our service area and with the(enter for Demographic Parrell B.uerea 5,575,100 5R511,300 5.532,s00 admiaturrative and Operationalproredures Research at California State Onireoity,Fullerton to update Ttm S.I,nm.Mum and Union. 636,748.54) $37,493,500 $37,655,M Chancto CORF xM Revenue Areas (I2.g30.ID0) ( 4411 M, (15.269.500) population and land use projections,the level of building Nate OWSudades.W D,91R24o 23.oe2y00 l4lases. There efforts,as will as others,continue fa achwity in our 470-square-mile service area and the AWMnbvuha Eapaua 332.BB0 696,700 803,300 Juan,on the Districts singular goal:to oratorio ynlume of wastewater treated. Tiv"nnrs c",d Meech Nip 1A43.0110 loesim sell "best in class"status lJl the waslEwatea' Opening E.pese 5,376,BB0 4,834,400 4,903.100 Cmmaual5ervxu 7.036,050 6A9D,1 An 6,73BSOU treatment industry,an industry that is Increased Capital improvement Pmressmml soma. 1.111 1.707300 IA22.300 becoming and mootorNg 2.2B2.000 2,3m.500 2.43e,becoming increasingly competitive as more and Program 6110 Repair,and Mamwnre 3.199,040 4,169,200 s.5m,300 more notes naffonmi are de bah rivafiaed Umalea 3,714,950 3,693,700 3,578.500 ag being Other 2582,060 2.164,700 2.687.70K) Among several outcomes,the Strategic Plan identified areas Re cores and Omen (7.669,000) (7.278.300) pAssisl00) of our collection system and in-plant treatment processes Netlt OPer Expense. 1045$00,000 g43a104,200 WIMIS000 that must be expanded or rehabilitated•to meet the growing (g: In-sourcing Ocean Monitoring senor wastewater facilities while,at the same time,ensunng Prograrek operational efficiency within all areas of the organization. In 1985,the District's aeon monitoring program was out- In accordance with the stalling plan,a reduction of 24.5 full. sourced primarily on enure perceived program objectinty as time equivalent(FTE)positions is being proposed in 1999-00, a msult of the stringent requirements of our 301(h)waiver. 3 FEE position,below the original third year urge!of S21.5 RE. r L This program now costs the District$1.3 million annually. Own the last No fiscal years,a total of 73 FIE positions have all In March 1999,son determined that estimated savings of been eliminated as suf0ng was reduced from 616 FTE,to 5284,000 could be obtained each year by in-souning(train S43 Uh for 1998.99. Y program elements and utilizing existing staff. �. R4 Engineering Efforts r Further investigation revealed that other agencies that have possessed a 301(h)waiver,such as the Cityof Los Angeles, During 1996-97.the Districts Anenment and Reinvention '. �' ///t County Sanitation District of Los Angeles,and the City of Team(BARD war formed with the goal of reducing the nor of San Diego,all conducted in-house monitoring programs. our operations while increasing our level of el&iency,to exceed /\ However,these agencies have also implemented Quality that of the most efficient wastewater treatment facility in the /V Assurance/Quality Control Programs(QWC Programs)to industry. Comprised of employees from all naffing levels,DART FY 1999 ensure objectivity in performing mean monitoring in house. has made significant progress toward making the District"best 1111111111111111111 These QA/Q(Programs will be developed at the District as in class." In 1997-98,DART developed a Reinvention Report pan of the new mean monitoring in-sourcing requirements. that contain,the O&M reinvention plan and the steps to implement thecontained within ting themn of The timeline for in-souring the Ocean Monitoring Program implementation and adding the onetime savings.the is two years. SUN began benthic field sampling In April rxommendations(cntained within this are expected 1999 and will begin conducting cowl sampling in July 1999. to generate a net fire-year return of$3.290.600,with annual T This will bring all orean monimring field sampling in-house savings o1$1,440,000 Innaffn. since staff already conducts required offshore water quality surveys. A,a result.(our enhanced training program and the implementation of workforce flexibility,(cooled with greater The next phase of in sourcing will be database management work-practice efficiencies identified by DART,the District has and the writing of the Ocean Monitoring Program Annual been able to reduce staffing levels primarily through attrition. Report. Database management will be brought in-house when the Districts Dan Warehousing Project is complete. - Strategic Goals The writing of the annual repon will be evaluated in the future nd a determination made as cc hat role staff and During this fiscal year we will continue to focus on five Strategic contnnon will play in the production of the document Goals that represent our long-term commitment to excellence Executiveand establish a framework to achieve boo-fn-dau status. Summary ummary «f Five-Year Staling Plan These goals are as follows: In the past,we have compared ourselves with other publicly • Consistently Employ Strategic and Tactical Resource owned and operated wastewater treatment facilities of Planning similar size,and the results have always been favorable. a Develop and Maintain an Effective and Efficient Workforce However,the results of a study conducted in early 1996 were as Consistently Apply Appropriate Technology not at reassuring. We learned that our staffing levels when compared to privatized systems were higher,and as a result, • Consistently Deliver Excellent Health and Environmental t we developed a Fin Yea,Staffing Plan, Protection se Consistently Deliver an Excellent level of Service j The plan relies primarily on normal attrition to bring us to , staffing levels that more closely match the levels of private Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Us,Arrnur,FDumaln Valley,G 92708-7018 ,tee Orange County Sanitation District, California moon u,at 714462.2411 D,m,.nsdmm 1ewt ROLL CALL 41 " lvel� BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 1111U 99 { 7 — TIME: (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... dI _ FLORY (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓ _ (COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................✓ — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.................. ... �C� — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... ✓ _ DOTSON (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. t✓ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... �G — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... ✓ (SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON.................... — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES........................... — (MARSHALL).................... MALILLER..................... — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ _ LUTZ (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... — (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. i✓ (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ _G — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... _ (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ✓ _ (BLAKE).............................WALKER ...........�........... — Anders on `y IN/1G�4 Anderson ✓l Kye li ✓ LudwinAll McIntyreles Miles Ooten Peterman ✓ Streed ✓ Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: Woodruff T /�JQ�AdLr� Andrus 03/24/99 %Vadon\d"lwp.dta'admin%BSIDIRECTOR\DirMom Roll Call.dm STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and the Agenda for the Special Board Workshop to be held on �4 /U 199-L, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the District's offices on ' 4akt- Ll , 199-Z. y�— IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this (' day of 199-Z. Penny M. le, Secrete Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HAWP.DTA\ADMIN\SSWORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATIONTAHR COMMITTEEMOC tORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 4, 1999 ahane: E7141962-2411 .111n0 add.: P.O. Bcx 8127 Fountain NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP aeraae add...: 10844 alis Avenue BOARD OF DIRECTORS r ctaln Valley.CA 92708-7018 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WEDNESDAY, November 10, 1999 — 5:00 P.M. Water Agencix DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES • 10844 Ellis Avenue cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 Anaheim Brea Buena Park Lyprass wanrein AllayF.gertan A Special Workshop Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Bardan crave Sanitation District will be heat the above location, time and date. Huncingron Beach Irvine La Hebra La Palma Los Alamitos ...NNN Newport Beach B rd Secr/lbry Orange Placentia Banta Ana Beal Beach Btanton Tustin Ville Park Yarba Linda County of Orange Bonita Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch 'To Protect Me Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in wastewater Systems' AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SPECIAL WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 10, 1999— 5:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 4. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 5. Presentation by staff regarding Biosolids Management Contracts: Yakima Composting Facility and Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch 6. Adjournment PRODUCTION & MANAGEMENT OF BIOSOLIDS IN SO. CALIFORNIA Projected Shorfall In 6loeollda Management OPOons Due to Loss of Class a site, Wet Tons per Day(wVd)on Annualized Basis — Actual — Estimated —Projected - 199C 1998 3.Q.g.Q i:QQQ 2001. 2004 PRODUCTION la alit County of Los Angeles(3) 1.376 1.403 1,431 1.459 1,488 1.518 1,548 1,579 City of Los Angeles(2) 1.050 950 900 918 938 955 974 994 City of San Diego(1) 400 450 Soo 510 624 637 649 662 Orange County(2) 500 510 520 531 541 552 563 574 Other Agencies If 5 to 20) $@4 894 LM 1.040 1.071 1.103 1.136 1.170 TOTAL PRODUCTION $j06 A2ea 178Q AMR aeaa AT6a Am it= MANAGEMENT OPTIONS Class A:Captive Composting Chino Basin Compost 0 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 LA City zoo 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Other Smell Projects 10 SQQ ]QQ ]QQ Ip,Q j0Q 10 10 SUB-TOTAL 110 210 215 220 225 230 235 240 %Total 3% a% 6% a% a% a% e% a% Class A:Contractor Composting FSan Joaquin (McCarthy) 200 200 300 400 500 800 1,000 1,000 ey Composting(Yakima) I--Parm)rs 4 Carsl'n->I 100 300 750 850 e Ranch (Magan/Orange Cry) I—Perrnls AComr'n-> JQQ am -40 rn Count • 200 200 300 400 600 1,000 2,050 2,260 Corona (Recyc/Synegr0)' 500 600 3001 400 500 500 500 500 Antelope Valley (BioGro) Q Q ----permlbiasued,Culpsobeblywl3never bebrull---> SUB-TOTAL 700 800 Soo 800 1,100 1,500 2,550 2.750 %Table 16% 19% 14% 18% 24% 31% am 55% Class B: Lend Application Kern County' 2,100 2,000 1,770 1,660 1,63E 1,32E I—Banned —s Kings County' 400 400 Soo 500 500 am Soo Soo Riverside County3 350 400 300 300 200 150 75 0 San Diego County+ Q ]QQ JIM iN IN 100 OQ 0 SUB-TOTAL 2.850 2,960 2,720 2.610 2,385 2,075 625 500 %Total A% ae% Im ea% 51% 44% 13% 10% Other Methods Hyperion HERS 300 -----permanently decommissioned due to high coals a safety------- PuenteHillsLandfill (LACSD) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Sycamore Landfill(San Diego) 0 0 500 505 629 636 640 665 Mitsubishi Cement Kiln 25 E9 2@ 25 25 2Q 25 a SUB-TOTAL 625 325 825 830 954 961 965 990 %Total 18% a% 19% 1tt% 20% 20% 20% 20% TOTAL MANAGEMENT M I= A3ao &M 6ea8 176E L376 G4B0 SHORTFALL 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 Soo 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1OY. 10% Kern County does not want quantity of Imported bio ni ids to Increase;thus,awn after Class a ban,Mporn may be limited to about 2,250 west Best case sunrise for this really in prOblemetic location;issuance II will remain open by convening W Aerated Static Pile composting melho0 ,Includes 350 well of LACSD biennials applied on McCarthy Family Farm nil 150 wed of OCSD biosdists applied on Tule Ranch 3 Class B land rppicallm sites In Riverside and northern San Diego CoumN9 are gradually being lost due to housing developments G:1Bacef.JtoltsUS501bamidR33oCol absolute Balance 11/17me City of Los Angeles EQ Biosolids Management Proposals November 8, 1999' Company Technology Price (Wet Ton) Waste Markets Landfill alternative daily cover (ADC) of $32.50 onsite alkaline-stabilized biosolids Transitional Lime stabilization and land application $40.00 (Est.) Environmental Corp. Enertech "Slung Carb" liquid carbonized fuel $44.00 Environmental Inc. California Soil Chemical stabilization/pasteurization and $23.97 -$32.70 Products land application Terraloa Technologies Deep well injection $25.00 Saltdale Class B land application $26.50 (Slick Gardner) Chemical stabilization and land $32.50 application San Joaquin Composting and land application $30.06 -$30.56 Composting S na ro Com ostin and land application $35.00 Est. Minergy Corp. Glassification and industrial use $40.00 Est. U.S. Filter Bioset TechnologyN/A Hondo Chemical stabilization/pasteurization and $27.00 land application Thermo Energy I Sludge-to-oil Reactor System (STORS) N/A Environmental Corp. I Twelve proposals were submitted to the City of Los Angeles on November 8, 1999 in response to their request for proposals for innovative and EQ biosolids management options. District's staff reviewed public copies of the proposals. 2 Inclusion of price in the public copies of the proposals was not required. 3 Price estimation based on unsolicited proposals received by the District. H:Nvp.dletl W5ftero1dUk A RFP Revim.dao Biosolids Management Financial Analysis Status Quo Video Haulingane Mgmnt Reg.Comp Toal Coats (1999 Year Cost(fAvq Coats($Avt) Went) Dollars) 1999-00 2000.01 $25.50 $6.00 $31.50 $30.00 2001A2 $20.14 50.00 $32.14 $29.15 MOM $28.70 $6.00 $32.79 $28.33 2003-M $VA8 0.00 $33.46 $27.53 2004.05 $28.15 ".00 WAS $20.70 200 -06 $23.06 $6.00 SUAS $25.01 2008.07 $28.57 $6.00 $35.57 $25.28 2007-00 $30.31 $8.00 $35.31 $24.60 2008.09 $31.07 $8.00 537.07 $23.80 2009-10 $31.85 $8.00 $37.85 $2323 Averepe Pm ram Cpsl in -Yr 1BB9 E/wl Yakima Compost Option Based upon a maximum annual application men of 126.000 et Ten Year Caudly Price=$1.250.000 pp ApS cost CapacCast ry Crean Tag coal Prem(1999 Valuo Year Cepeclry Prko (Sag CocySlwt) (SAhI Olaer Fao (SNd) rye89 Dollare) 1099.00 $1,250,000 (See Ngatlt) 2NO-01 E27A0 $130 41.06 $0,50 $27.55 $26.23 2001-02 $20.09 $1.30 41.05 $0,60 $28.23 $26.61 2002-03 $20.79 $1.00 $1.65 $0.60 $28.93 $24.99 2003.04 $20.61 $1.30 41.05 110.50 $29.66 $24.39 2004-05 $30.24 $1.30 -$1.85 $0.60 $30.39 $23.81 2005-00 $31.00 $1.30 41.05 $0.50 $31.15 523.24 2006-07 $31.76 $1.30 41.05 $0.50 $31.02 11=41? 2007-08 $32.67 $1.30 41.65 $0.50 $32.72 $22.14 2008.00 $33.39 $1.30 41.0 $0.50 $33.53 $21.61 2009.10 SUM $1.30 -Silos $0.50 $34.36 $21.10 vpre o Propmm st - r E I wl Title Ranch Land Purchase Option Based upon a maximum annual application rate of 5D.000 wt(26wVecre) call,a selected Land PumhaseMell App.Coel Amordood Taxes SWRCB Fee. Total Coal Prs$ent Vales Year Pd. (Saar) Land Cost ISM) (Stet) ($A-Q (INS Dollars) 100"a O8ars1,600tAc (sesumatlp (6eatba 200"1 $23.0 $4.69 $0.29 $1 $2898 $27.60 2001.02 $23.50 "All $0.30 $1 $29.56 =11,81 2002.03 $24.18 "All $0.a0 $1 $30.15 MIME 2003-N $24.77 54.69 $0.31 51 $30.77 $25.31 2004-05 $25.30 $4.60 $0.31 $1 $31.39 $24.0 200640 528.02 NAB $0.32 $1 $32.03 $23.90 2008-07 528.87 $4.00 $0.33 61 $32.69 $23.23 2007-oa Mat $4.89 $0.33 $1 $33.36 $22.50 2008.00 528.02 $4.80 50.34 $1 $E4.OS $21.95 2009.10 Sell$1.300/Ac $26.72 $469 $OaS $1 $34.76 $21.34 Weapon Asars0 mrsm wtn -Yr1989S Iwl All amarara5on epmsanf value calcutalbns ere Casee upon 5%learned cols Massif Cost insulation 5925%peremium Nate A2 Calculated®1%ofac4ad land valua. Inl0el value of E600/AcaxalatlnA®5%perennum Note Based upon Me MOO(Year 1999)value ofE80WAC One ascala0np8 5%W annum Biosollds Management Financial Analysis Biosolids Annual Reuse Program Opgon /Disposal Cost 0 Cost($Avt) wVyear Land application utill9ing adedng conyacb and meaning cumenily a ddlefttled regulatory requimmants(StaNa Quo) $26.49 $5,163,000 125,000w to Yakima•50,000 w to Tula Rana S Remaining Shale Quo $24.07 $4,694,139 Because of a fight housing supply and high demand generated by strong job growth, upward pressure on housing prices will continue at double digit rates in 1999 before dropping back to 7.6 percent appreciation in 2000. Recent statistics from the Real Estate Research Council suggest that housing prices in Orange County, unlike other Southern California counties, have finally recovered all the losses incurred during the first half of the 1990's. The District implemented a five-year rate schedule in May 1997 that provides for gradual increases for four of the nine Revenue Areas through 2001-02. The two Revenue Areas in need of the largest adjustments voted to extend their increases over a ten-year period beginning In 1997-98. a move designed to ease the immediate impact of those Increases on their residents. Pending completion of the new strategic plan, it is anticipated that three Revenue Areas will require no change in their sewer service user fees through 2000-01. Prior to this increase, the District had been operating without an increase In sewer service fees over the last five years by deferring the construction of new facilities and by reorganizing and streamlining operations which resulted in the reduction of actual staffing levels by 93 positions, or 14.9 percent of the workforce, primarily through attrition. However, rate increases became Inevitable as the District's capital improvement and rehabilitation requirements and Certificate of Participation debt obligations grew beyond the District's ability to pay solely from property tax proceeds. In 1998, the District conducted an in-depth review of it's reserve policies. This review included a survey of the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 1999, the District's designated retained earnings totaled $376 million, and have been earmarked for the following specific purposes In accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy: Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 56 million Designated For Self-Insurance 54 million Designated For Capital Improvements 122 million Designated For Capital Replacement&Rehabilitation 44 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 33 million Designated For Rate Stabilization 67 million Total Designated Retained Earnings $376 million MAJOR INITIATIVES Strategic Plan The District is currently undergoing a major strategic planning effort that will define goals, operational commitments and associated financial requirements for the next ten years. The strategic plan revises many of the assumptions used to develop the District's existing planning document, including the population and land use projections, the level of building activity within the service area and the volume of wastewater treated. The plan, which Is expected to be completed in the Fall of 1999, will also provide an operations and financial plan, including a review of the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and a study of the ocean ouffall system. Reinvention Based on an Operations and Maintenance(O&M)efficiency assessment conducted in the Spring of 1995, it was determined that an additional 16 percent reduction in personnel and technology costs would have to be achieved in order to become "best in class". Shortly following this assessment, a District's Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed to involve employees in the implementation of iii r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 1998 Depreciation Net Property and Operating Net Changeto Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (LOU) (Loss) Capital 1 $ 2,008 $ 5,696 $ 3.138 $ (2,732) $ (1,681) $ (320) 2 9,596 18,232 10,330 (7,345) 4,276 3,123 3 10,637 18,553 10,128 (51796) 8.165 1,846 5 2,661 1,980 1,902 (2,400) 1,336 464 6 1,194 3,229 1,250 297 2,440 96 7 3,024 4,362 3,850 (5,333) (1,523) (487) 11 2,167 3,517 2,327 (2,181) 782 1,109 13 - 742 312 (71) 725 653 14 - 2,604 (3,855) (3,289) (1,699) Total $ 31.287 $ 56,291 $ 35,841 $ (29,416) $ 11.330 $ 4,786 Net Total Assets Due From Due to Additions (Including Due Other Other Net Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity 1 $ 6,622 $ 93,197 $ 840 $ 10,737 $ 225 $ 48,2D8 $ 31.804 2 12,235 385,590 6.768 237 52,104 126.872 251.828 3 17,010 384,084 4,885 2,177 89,669 120,251 264.918 5 3,141 87,827 299 1,144 17.039 21,687 64.072 6 295 60.146 4.740 991 23,264 16,395 42,072 7 11,016 127,931 466 4,928 14,440 26,454 94,403 11 4,373 91,163 340 4,781 6,488 24,306 60,364 13 862 22,516 148 611 2,079 3D0 21.411 14 (8,857) 72,269 8,657 1,537 6,110 1,764 67.451 Total $ 48,697 $ 1,324,723 $ 27.143 $ 27,143 $ 211,416 $ 386,237 $ 888,323 (10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures Revenue Area No. 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1999 and 1998 of $17,443,183 and $16,052,791, respectively. This deficit is expected to be eliminated by revised service charges in future years. (11)Contingencies On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) collectively filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. At the (Continued) 24 a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 time the District had $454,291,774 on deposit in the OCIP. On May 2, 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California Santa Ana Division ("Bankruptcy Court"), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the OCIP and OCIP Participants. On May 15, 1996, the settlement agreement, as amended by the County of Orange Plan of Adjustment, was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The Settlement provided for the District to receive "Settlement Secured Claims" against the County. The Settlement Secured Claims are secured by a first-priority, secured interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered by the County from third party defendants. The District also received "Repayment Claims'. The repayment claims are secured by a second-priority, security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an "allowed" claim in the County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement. Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this litigation. A litigation fund has been formed by the OCIP participants with approximately$50 million available to pursue litigation. The District has recorded $88,340,640 as a non-current receivable on its June 30, 1999 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of investments in the OCIP. Of this amount, the District estimates future OCIP distributions approximating$60,000,000 leaving a potential unrecovered balance of$28,340,000, or 62 percent of the deposit at the time of the bankruptcy. (Continued) 25 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Miscellaneous Statistics June 30, 1999 District Organization: 1 Consolidated District servicing 23 cities,unincorporated areas, and three special districts as follows: Revenue Area No. 1 Revenue Area No.3 Revenue Area No.7 County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange Cities: Cities: Cities: Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea Orange Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana Special Districts: Cypress Tustin Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts: District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary Garden Grove District Huntington Beach La Habra La Patina Revenue Area No. 11 Los Alamitos County of Orange Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach Seal Beady Revenue Area No.2 Stanton Revenue Area No. 13 County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange Cities: Midway City Sanitary Cities: Anaheim District Brea Brea Orange Fountain Valley Revenue Area No.5 Yoma Linda Fullerton County of Orange Garden Grove City of Newport Beach La Habra Ravenue Area No. 14 Orange County of Orange Placentia Revenue Area No.6 Cities: Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine Villa Park Cities: Orange Yoma Linda Newport Beach Tustin Special Districts: Special Districts: Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Ranch Water District District Governing Body: 25 member Board of Directors. Staff: 518.5 authorized full-time equivalent employees. Operational Date: July 1, 1954. Authority: Califomia Health 8 Safety Cade Section 4700 at. seq. Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal. Service Area: 471 square miles. Population Served: 2,386,375 Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtrunk sewers-650 miles Number of pumping stations-22 Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 89 million of gallons per day Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 152 million of gallons per day Total 241 million of gallons per day Source: Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division. 48 ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: November 17. 1999 TIME: 6:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ i — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ ✓ _ (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓ (COOK) ............................ COLLINS....................... �� ✓ — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... �/ ✓ — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... i ✓ — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE...................... � ✓ — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. J� — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... ✓ — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... a — (SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON................... ✓ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.........................._G ✓ — (MARSHALL).................... MAUILLER..................... (DALY)............................. #.............. (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. �L ✓ — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... �, a — (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. i ✓ — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ v — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ ✓ — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ (SMITH, GREG)............... SHEA........................... ✓ — — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... .7 — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ...C — — — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson ✓ �M�o Ghirelli ✓ Kyle ✓ � Ludwin a oYoy^4 McIntyre ✓ T Miles ✓ t j „ OatenPeterman ✓ DQG��1�� Streed Tuchman OTHERS: Woodruff ✓ l�ty �u Andrus 11/17/99 WWonWalal Wry.dla\admin0S\0lRECT0R0ractors Roll Call doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) AAIAL ij w HOME ADDRESS: Z;77,J l/iEG.�.c✓w+ `„ _ (number/street) 'L/11 7 92Fra� (city/zip code) z TELEPHONE: / s'O'7H s✓ / REPRESENTING: �M sd� �/rz` [/d (self/name of or nization) HMvo.dtMadmin\BS\FORMS\Rmuest to Smak.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.DATE: — AGENDA ITEM NO. -1 /7 . /, /, , ,' . , , , , , , Show-eff-NEE 5T7 NAME: (please print) �,c �c Q/�/0 (! 141 HOME ADDRESS: ov eE49'Lo S (number/street) (city/zip� code)) / / TELEPHONE: 1 Yl 33 0 Z /-7— Y REPRESENTING: *LSTYZX f7 Q�/�2�Z- �`!e_ (self/name of organization) H-. vp.d1a1aftnXBS1F0RMSXRequest to Speak.d SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) e 5 Moec" q± ALS7`yc� %O,o l sL n)6- �o�i✓ r�s12oJFL Pain u Sy„ ao pl'o. &z. A✓ � /h .c G. qa � t f. « l/-e- "o H:\WP.OTAWOMINAWFORMSMGNaN FORM.D a I A I L UY I:ALIhUKNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on "� / � . 19_&was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ����/CJ , 19.D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /V day of Ol�i2`t'i�r✓G�c� , 19� Penny M. Ky4b, Secret Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District N1 W P.DTA=MIN%8S%FOR MS%F27A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r November 10, 1999 7M.: (7141962 2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors malllnr eaa,ea.: Pp. Bo.8127 Subject: Board Letter Founta,n Valley.CA 9272E 8127 a"at a2Gw: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 10844 Eats Avenue Fountain valley.cA information on any of the items, please call me. 92708-7018 Laboratory Accreditation Ma,nbe As part of the laboratory certification process of the California Health Services Agencies Department, Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP), an audit of a laboratory operations is performed every other year. On November 3, Mr. Tsing Zia cities audited the Environmental Sciences Laboratory. Only two minor findings were made, neither of which affects the quality or accuracy of the laboratory analyses. The enahaah auditor commented very favorably on the overall lab operation and the competency of Brea the laboratory cal staff. Beene van rY analytical N ypra Fountain Fm h This completes the second phase of ELAP certification. The third phase is successful Barden croya analysis of"unknown" performance evaluation samples, which will be received and Haaungwn Beach analyzed sometime during the first half of 2000. These samples are similar to the ab a "unknowns" man of us had in our chemist and biology classes in school. The is Hahne Y chemistry 9Y Le Pala,. difference is that the lab must pass at the level of 100% accuracy. Lab staff have Lea Alanot. performed to that level of competence repeatedly over the past eight years of the NewportGrga'h ELAP program. placome San.An. New Chair of the Senate's Committee on Environment and Public Works seal Beach Stanwn r nn Senator Bob Smith (R-NH) has been appointed the new chairman of the Committee Von Pen on Environment and Public Works to fill the vacant seat left by the late Senator John r rh.undo Chaffee (R-RI). Members of the committee and environmental groups have noted that County of orange the recent appointment could potentially have profound effects on environmental policy considering Senator Smith's desire to reduce federal involvement in sanitary Districts environmental protection. caaw Maaa District co-sponsored Forum on Managing Public Controversy M,dway cry water Districts On October 20, Peter Sandman addressed public officials and staff at a forum co- sponsored by the District, Carollo Engineers, Camp Dresser McGee and MWDOC. Irr,ne Ranch There were about 90 participants, including several Directors. Dr. Sandman has an article, Risk= Hazard + Outrage, Coping with Controversy about Utility Risks (ropy attached), which is printed in a special AMSA advertising section of the October 4, 1999 Engineering News-Record. If you would like a copy of the entire section on Utility Leadership in the New Millennium, please call Michelle Tuchman at 714 593-7120. -To protect the Puhla,Health and the Ehr rm hh.ht&rough E+celleace n,M.. .wr SY4ems- r Members of the Board Page 2 April 21, 1999 Y2K Bill Signed into Law Earlier this year, President Bill Clinton signed the Y2K Act into law. This bill was tracked and analyzed by ECM, and also analyzed by District's Counsel. Our analysis shows that the bill could have several effects on the District, which are stated below. • The Act primarily protects manufacturers of equipment excessive punitive damages. The District already has some protection in state court, where these cases are usually handled. This indemnification, therefore, will give the District little new protection, while making claims against manufacturers more difficult for the District. • The Act does protect the District's contractors from being named as co- defendants in a lawsuit against the District, thereby possibly isolating them from proportionate liability. • If the District is involved in legal actions, the plaintiff may not know the damages are Y2K related. Under those circumstances, the District must note this to obtain protection under the Act. • Violations of environmental regulations are not covered by the Act. Therefore, the District is not protected from regulatory or legal actions from Y2K induced violations of environmental regulations. Overall, this bill potentially could put the District slightly at risk, while benefiting manufacturers, and provides the District with little new protection for problems related to Y2K problems. Odor Complaints In the last three weeks, only two odor complaints were received, in spite of all the hot weather. One was from a neighbor to the west of Plant 1 and after operations made changes the neighbor called back to say that the situation was much better. The other complaint was in the collection system and no odors were detected when an odor circuit was taken. Eastside Reservoir Inspection Tour There is space available on the one-day November 22 Eastside Reservoir Inspection Tour hosted by Director Kenny Witt of MWDOC. If you are interested in attending, please call Lorraine Roy at MWDOC, 714 963-3058, as soon as possible. Letters of Appreciation We received the attached September 30 letter of thanks from the Orange County Grand Jury, which visited the District on September 29 for a briefing on our programs. The Grand Jury routinely visits our agency to review our operations. Members of the Board Page 3 April 21, 1999 On October 7, Scott Baugh held a forum that centered in large part around the issue of the impact of stormwatedurban runnoff on beach closures and public health. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, and Blake Anderson made a presentation and provided technical assistance and expert testimony. Attached is an October 29. 1999 letter of appreciation from Assemblyman Baugh. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles and other publications from various sources that you may find interesting. There is a reading notebook of all articles of interest to the District that is maintained by the Communications Department. It is available for review at the Board meetings. If you are interested in a certain article, contact Michelle Tuchman for copies. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Dona d�ntyre General Manager DFM:jt H WP DT UDMIMGW MLLETTERS TO THE ROPRPHP111799.000 Attachments AMSA UTILITY LEADERSHIP IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM - Risk = Hazard + Outrage: Coping with Controversy about Utility Risks by Peter M. Sandman, Ph.D. Assume that people are worried about sus outrage distinction is just a special The Progression of Controversy some risk posed by your operations. case of the distinction between substance Here is the"natural history"of a typical Tbey're worried about heavy metals in and process. In any controversy (a pro- risk controversy, in four stages. The sewage sludge (okay,byosofids) ...or a posed rate increase, an odor problem, a controversy begins when some group possible chlorine explosion ... or emis- contract renegotiation with the union, complains that something is dangerous. sions from your power plant...or CO or even a dispute with an individual cus You investigate the hazard and deter- THMs or EMFs. miner),how hot the battle gets depends mine to your satisfaction that it is low. Every utility—sewemge, water, mere on process than on substance. So you ignore the complainers. But power, gas—has a full portfolio of such And of course,increasing competi- people do not respond well to being risks Some are chronic, some acute; tion means these battles matter all the ignored. They get more angry, more some concern your neighbors, some more, since customer loyalty can be frightened. They also gain more cus tomers,stomers;some are genuinely dao- momentmm more members,contnbu- gerous,sometedmially trivial.A➢repro heavily aged by a highoutrage lions,media covers That propels you sent potential sources of risk controversy controve into the second stage. P Pe If you're a public utility leader,the A gve skill In Stage Two,having failed to ignore buck will ultimately stop on your desk Preventing and managing outrage, in Your critics into oblivion,You try to bury How you manage risk will, in part, short,will be a key Bldg for utility lead- mate them m the data You collect all the evF define your tenure and shape your ulti- Bence you ren thatyou're right and success. are tw in the new millennium. ThemtihWre cols,and you dmpdion them are two points here. First c anymiica Risk E Equals mnageme is seem to than manYutility in the hopewthat it will as ell em on appy q �p managements seem to think this works home. People a the job ried divide the "risk" le are The And second,the kind of commune as it would at home. People are not rigid about into eo two components. the cation that matters most isrt placing Pleased to be called fools. 'they get technical side of the risk focuses d the uff pieces in the media aboutajob well more angry and more frightened,more magnitude and probability of the cm- momentum and more power . . . and able outcomes: tr increase in the so- done; s anticipating and responding m cer rate, a catastrophic accident dead worries and grievances, to outrage. now You're in the third stage. fish in the river,even a decline in prop Rusk communication, not conventional In Stage Three, having failed to erty values.Call all this"hazard public relations,is the key. ." ignore them into oblivion,having fooled The nontechnical side of the risk the typical risk controversy comes to bury them in the data,you now look focuses an everything negative about the when the bazard is low and the outrage for a way to attack their motives. If situation itself (as opposed to those out is high Captivated by the high outrage, they,professionals you all them met- comes),Isftvoluntary or coerced,familiar the public insists the problem is sen, cenaries; if they�re amateurs you call orezotic,dreaded ornotdreaded?Areyou ous;lulled by the low hazard,the utility them ignorant If they're on the right trustworthy or an insists it isn't untrustworthy,all°rlhy,responsive The utility is right about the hazard You all them fascists:i they're h the or unresponsive?Call all this"outrage." ty left You can them radicals. If they're andwrong abomthe outrage.The public men you all them macho; if they're Frst Principles is right about the outrage and wrong women you call them hysterical. Given these definitions, here is the about the hazard.And of course until the People don't like having their Fust Law(maybe the only law) of Risk utilitydoes something to reduce the out motives attacked. Once again, anger, Communication: outrage, not hazard rage,it has very little chance ofpersuad. fear,. momentum, and power escalate. drives reputation.Even significant haz- mg the public that the hazard is low. Welcome to the fourth stage, ards are usually tolerated when out In Stage Four you get a telephone rage is low,and even insignificant baz- call from top management"nds is get ards are usually rejected when outrage ting serious,"you are told."These Pep is high. ple used to be just a minor irritant But Of course whenever hazard is high, now regulators are asking awkward you have to manage it right—for legal and . questions, newspapers are running regulatory reasons as well as ethical and embarrassing stories, politicians we technical reasons.But whether hazard is I thought were on our side are putting high or not,and whether you manage it some distance between us and them.I right or not if outrage is high you're dout are what you have to do, get going to be in reputationaltrouble.Spyor these people off our backs!" have to manage outrage right too. And so You end up spending mit Most fundamentafty,the hazard-ver- lions of dollars faing the hazard that you decided at Stage Onewas too trivial to be worth facing. Managing Outrage A Primer The guidelines, for. mitigating—and not to yot The more often and your hand. Now have the grace to 4 prevmfing utrage are .deceptively apologeticalty_yat arlmowledge the -.sayso Amibufiggyourgoodbehav-: obvious.Flve key ones: sins of ithezp.n4.tfie mole.:4ukl y "for to yom•:.Qv om�natural,goodneas; 1 Stake out the middle; not the -.others decide ifs hmeto move oD loggers skep*Rwo',Attributing it extreme:)n a 5ght between"tem'bly 8; Acknowledge current ProbleIDs. t f¢ pregsur¢.gnx yncteases the: dangerous"and per(ecfiysal2, the Ow;sioos, distortrdDs, and- splo` ,LTcekbnod believe _you- wmner wit be"ternby dsmga'ous. congo)r damage aedibiTi(ynmrJ�as But modkstly dangaobs"1,aya tbn- �mdclT�oujrlgMGeg.. .odyway `STi °gon(Egr4ai�'ao�iwniable. . tenderlfyoafieservea$ achnsts 'LobutTdiaedrbfiitypir aac]mu� f,( e)u$ite Qte; iyagerWe w�F . can get aivaywdh'grving you anF :WobldDs- s.rDu'solu'e? -dt Pe-q)-aletPteeVe tEe iD? mstcad,.Izutym!wron'theabletoget '�'<6cforejrd4kouwdyWwM iffi(efo 'fjmighands.P.a7i 1oF io pt(RShe� awaYw'ifitgwing yourseganA tsolyetthet¢+-gp'id ,beygpd. me[e Tponk'okElsdphere,{ppahbtfitlgt$.; I Acknowledge prior misbehavior � honbly'��^'r•, t'+' 8y, UIEIU The prerogative of deciding an ,in,. Kk 'it R itiattr, .: You can-.Put your wstakes behmd ,'ty Odyoq�r� +� ' .your you belongs to your stakebokders, :untr1 a.ap4vrets forced Soo0. r`»> c5 . :. -I .. ... ..[.a7 u. . -.a . , . . n. �...Na. •�,A� vrw J.va _Ca-l. i.yNluNwtt-fy .�.. ...... ... Would a Simple apology suffice? ficular emphasis on sharing Control.In And once there is consensus on which And that doesn'twork either.Your prob. fact,I sometimes take the more radical one to do, well implement it as eff- lem was an outage problem,not a hu- position that utilities should think about ciently as we know how.But the choice and Problem Your critics needed an abandoning Control altogether. is yours." apology and a Community Advisory Suppose you're the water company. In no time stakeholders are taking Panel,not a$40 million piece of equip Your job is to provide the safest,cheap you out for a beer, and ask, ryes, but ment They re still outraged.The only est, most plentiful water you can. But confidentially,which one do you think is Change is now you also are outraged, there are tradeoffs here. Safer, for bar You„ay have as much impacton because you've just wasted$40 million 'Ple, may mesa more expensive the outcome this way as holding onto on a useless piece of equipment and less plentiful the control...without the outrage. So here is the bottom line. The Who should decide these difficult But thafs the advanced course. proper response to a serious hazard is tradeoffs?Why not your customers?It Most of my utility clients ant quite to mitigate the hazard. The proper is,after all,theirwater,thew money,and imagine themselves abdicating control response to a serious outrage isn't to their health. (And your profits often altogether, defining themselves as ana- ignore it (as in Stages One,Two, and have almost nothing to do with how lysts and implementers rather than as Three),and isn't to mitigate the hazard these competing goals are compro. decision-makers. (as in Stage Four).The properresponse mired.) If you Can share control met impor- to a serious outrage is to mitigate the Similarly,should the electric power tan matters and delegate control on outrage. supplier be the one to decide what to do unimportant matters,you'll have made The sidebar (see "Managing about EMFs? Should the sewerage progress enough on the fifth of our five Outrage: A Primed summarizes five authority be the one to decide how guidelines for managing outrage. basic guidelines for managing outrage. much treatment is enough treatmenE If you're typical of my clients,you wig If you think an,we it an example from Cost Versus itisk find these principles simultaneously outside you field changes your mind. There are actually two seesaws in very obvious and very counter-intuitive. Should the Pentagon be the one to action here.The one I've talked about is Companies and agencies usually try decide which new weapons systems we power dynamics, where abandoning to win thew battles with critics.Instead, need to build? control paradoxically increases you I help my clients look for profitable ways influence.The other seesaw is cost ver- to settle,sometimes even to lose. The Tables Turn sus risk. Understanding the principles of Note that when you abandon Control, Utilities usually advocate cost Coo- outrage management and maldng them you experience an immediate compen- trol, leaving regulators, activists, and work isn't the challenge. The challenge sating increase in influence.This is one customers to demand more protective is overcoming the constraints of indi- of many examples of what I sometimes risk management But suppose you vidual psychology and organizational call 'the seesaw of risk communica- came out in favor of spending more culture that keep you from even wanti- tion." money to achieve higher health and ng to make them work Whichever side of the seesaw the environmental standards? utility rides, its publics are likely to Stakeholders would soon move to Sharing Decisions,sharing Control choose the empty seat and end up on the other seat on the Seesaw and com All five Principles are important, but the other side."Ifs not realty up to us," when I advise utilities,I tend to fait par- you say. "Well tell you what we think the eras and cons are of each option. 9 plain that you were being too profligate with their money. Assume for the moment that the low-cost outcome is inevitable. Which way of getting there is better for your utility? Warning the tight to protect your customers less,or losing the fight to protect them more? A Vital Tool for the New Millemsium Why add outrage management to your to-do lisO When people are outraged,it costs your utility money and the ability to get things done. I'reventing outrage A risk communication consultant based now is a lot cheaper than responding to in Newton Centre, MA, Peter M. it later.And outrage management does- Sandman has uwrked with scores of n't come naturally major companies and agencies around Ellie most organizations, utilities the world Saxdmax's training video- am accustomed to selling when there topes and his book on outrage maxage- are no problems and fighting when meet an available from the American there are problems.The key strategies Industrial H)giene Association,Fairfax, of outrage management ran counter to VA at(703)849BM(phone)or(703) both of these traditions. Theyre hard 2073561 flax). enough to do when you've decided to, impossible when you haven't His expert systems sa/tware program More and more utilities are decid- entitled 'OUTRAGE Prediction & ing to implement outrage management Management'it available from EMSeN strategies. No, that's too strong. start- Corp., Golden, CO at (303) 273 M ing to decide to.I don't know any utility, (phone) or (303) 2735070 (fax)- municipal or investor-owned, that has Sandman can be reached dira8y at integrated outrage management totally (617) 6300385 (phone), (617) 640 into its culture,that implements the sic 0384 (fax),or psandman®webtuxet strategies without hesitation and with- out fail. But I know more and more utilities that are well-launched, struggling,and making real progress. And I am confi- dent that in the early years of the new millennium,many more utilities will dis- cover the need to focus on outrage management ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST•SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701.714/834-3320 September 30, 1999 Donald F. McIntyre,General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. McIntyre: On behalf of the 1999-2000 Orange County Grand Jury, thank you very much for hospitality shown to us yesterday. Please extend our appreciation to the others on your staff that spent time with us. The information that you,Mr. Ghirelli,Mr. Anderson and Ms. Tuchman,provided was very informative and useful. With the people and facilities of OCSD, the majority of our county is in good hands. Very truly yours, 1999-2000 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY f� William J3. Aines,Chair EnvironmenVTransportation Committee WBB:cj BACAAYENIO OFFICE ^A $ +`r� BEACH TOFflCE STATE CAPITOL Cj s Dl 18WI GE B AC BURS t99 P.O.BO, A9A9 NUMINOTON BEACH,CA 9Pfin] SACMMENm,CA 94269-09fi) 1 nrNfJy ,YI"� t$�w tirp X(714)MJ19 t9(91 )319-2) �GYf� YA�.NNi lliG Ki1Nl4 FA%Q1Q 9CbB3$ FAx(819)J18-218) Ir pFl4/NAC 70 G11124L1 SCOTC R. BAUGH [OPIS-S r 0 ASSEMBLY REPUBLICAN LEADER MOZN -fzx ON°"�OcRa ANsalSc " glaY.06rY ( 17 GbylN October 29, 1999 A `Kc&vws Yoco III,A 1`/ Don McIntyre,General Manager rA tIS`-AQ-TT Orange County Sanitation District 'b�5 C` 1-C-M P.O. Box 8127 T" Fountain Valley, California 92728 �jfcA1L•i Dear Mr. McIntyre: Thank you once again for the participation of Bob Gh'velli and Blake Anderson in the forum that I hosted on October 7, 1999. The presentation and technical assistance they offered went above and beyond what I had anticipated,but circumstances were such that their expert testimony became an integral part of the educational forum. Both gentleman showed the utmost professionalism,and the forum would not have been as informative without their full participation. But they say that no good deed goes unpunished. The forum,which centered in large part around the issue of the impact of stormwaterlurban runoff on beach closures and public health,also addressed the critical question:What do we do next? Some of the suggestions, Comments and questions turned to the question of diversion. That is,specifically,diverting dry weather stornwater flows to the OCSD treatment works. The immediate question was: "Can the treatment system handle dry weather flows?" According to Mr. Ghirelli and Mr. Blake, diversion was actually used to evaluate the impact that strategy would have on bacterial counts. However, I had the distinct impression that it was done on a limited basis and for a limited time. So, in order to gather information with the ultimate intent of crafting legislation designed to develop solutions to this critical issue, I am formally requesting answers to the following questions: 1.What impact would result from using the treatment system for dry weather diversions for stormwater drains in the OCSD service area? Would the treatment works and/or the collection and distribution system need to be expanded? What additional capital Costs would be incurred from a dry weather flow diversion strategy? What additional operating costs would result from such a diversion strategy? What funding strategies could be employed, including the funding plan to pay for the limited diversion this past summer,and the potential use of state funds in the future(either new or existing funds,or speculative funds, including water bond funding)? 2.What similar type of Cost analysis results from evaluating diversion as a"year-round"(wet and dry weather flow)strategy? Some members in attendance pointed out that California had been"lucky"that it had not generally Combined its stormwater and sewerage systems into a single system. They Compared the"West Coast experience"to the"East Coast problems"with respect to the potential for system overload during wet weather flows. The sum of the Comments was that a diversion strategy presents its own unique set of"issues" It will be important for policy-makers to understand those issues and whatever information you SE,,,,THE COMMUMTLES OF MIMiNo)cNaE CH,CYPRESS,SEAL BEACH,LO.9ALAMrOS LA AIIMA.AOSSMOOA,FOUN)Aw VALLEY PrIMetl M R.WW PA Don McIntyre Page 2 could provide my of0ce on those issues would be greatly appreciated. I recognize that this request is somewhat extensive. However, I also understand that the OCSD is in the midst,or has recently concluded,its 20-year master plan update, and I am hopeful generating this information will not constitute a great burden on the district. Whatever information can be provided in a 30-day timefreme would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Peter Crandall of my staff at 916-319-2067. Thank you again for your assistance. Sincerely, Assembly Repu n Leader 11G UCt-'Lb-9`! U2: Ob✓ brPTOrI, Ld Y5E3rr L` Mar5Y1 1 Dairy Farmers in California Find Gold in Urban Sprawl By JAMES STERNGOLD CHINO.Calif.— Nearly four des- vel of automation and high yleMa. odes ago,Gerona DeBoer was one of But as Mrs. Definer recounted her many dairy farmers forced by re- success recently and time a vmimg tintless urbanumfion to Ore the past one giant herd after another fa farmland m ins Angeles County her I.esus. the air redolent of the i where her Immigrant parents had aromas generated by was of than- settled,to build a new life elsewhere. sands of Holslema W class W hough a challenge,the move turned she said with only a touch of n s�ta4 out to be a raised blessing with unex- gin,and even a sense of relief,thmlt peered results was all about to vamsh,driven over Mrs Definer and many of the oth- yet again by Southern Cabfomfah er dairy refugees eventually built urban sprawl present in the form EI stareoh[Mart milking operations brand new shopping centers and sub, bens In what was than a sun-baked divisions within sight of the mu*Wasteland.4D Mlles east of the spires hares. i� of downtown ins Angeles. Inshort InSouthern California sprawl h{s s order, they helped transform the been such a crosmnt dynw�In tqC near desert into something few out- area's restless geometry of grow't�4 ; aide the area had a clue about:are of ¢specialty N the post-war era,That r the most demelywarkmd andproduc- is not always an esem➢ tomany . five dairy rest, in the country. those whose lives are uprooted The huge, computerised dairy In the case of the mire V ms alb¢ I far shoehmdld into a relatively dairy farmers,the surge of tow,arrD. .If small area in the Chian Valley to San divlsmrm is wmaily mjecmg naW Bernardino County would.mme to vitalaymmo,eofthestate'shrgrsi play a msjor role In CaWornia's lit. industsma.Many of the farmers bare Oe-mo va keep ahead of Wlaconsm are selling a mended factll i sad several years ago w the moneys their valuable tracts of land,and ate largest.mklk-producNg state.a'--'- using the amply profits to build evaq } larger and tome mBclant oparetl®s In more bucolic areas. I Indeed. the big Increase th values as demand for new hnoatda6 soar, D financing a trawswn will result for most people tut broken dreams or the end of a way IRe but In a new generation of efficient daictes.As a result. - r out seems likely to substantially wld- es as lead over Wisconsin and tbti No.3 dairy state.New York. i ' Yeah, everything here is outdab .ad," Mn DCBoer Sand, w *A'- . ConWutedmt Page Ale a UGL-2L-ww UZ:"I t The spread of subdivisions in Chino. Calif., is forcing marry farmers to leave, but it is also injecting new resources into the dairy industry. Farmers are selling valuable tracts to finance larger operations elsewhere. Dairy Farmers Benefit From Sprawl Continued From Page AI stmlled through a sort,that held the sweet-sour smell of fresh milk and equipment that was up-16the minute W years ago. "In this business, you have to go forward or you're going backward. You have to keep grow- ing.You have to strive to get hater." Mrs.G Hcxrr is planning to sell her 200 acres, estimated to he worth about llINIO 0 an acre,and move her 2.000 cows to an efficient new farm J she owns son with a about 180 miles norlh of Tulare County,which is now the slate's ,000 c es ingthe doirywn it,up ,�r � ' Cher The id, acres they own up .3 an saiq cost only ahwt f2500 ifs an acre. '.>F2f: "What made all this possible in the ! , l Chino Valley was the money the formers got frnnt selling their land in I.es Angels.-said Rider Feenstra, _ the son of a La' Angeles dotrymnn ' and the executive director al the < " Milk Producers Cuuncd.the industry trade group here. "The process of urhanizatinn in Los Angeles pushes) the land prices up sat much that n arcelermN the growth W the mdus- try out hire. rh•farmers fame-wnh Gennir•and Fred DcHorrydan to sill dusr!110-.t.rc farm in China.Calif. the vapoal (it hold IN, ""IN .41. .mil eau... L.pxt rvrw.Lv....d it.,Los Anerle-s spr.twl lo'Cularr C.nnny. t • r:o now.• Oct-25-99 02:08P Siemon, Larsen & Marsh 949—/51—btlUq Mc Feeasrro punted to a new ad- ditior, to hie gfRM wall, a map of the local economy,including,among "On a lot of those farms in thej Cow freckled with red dots other things,w OR well,a tuna and a Midwest and back East• every cow representing dairy farms, and add- cow. Her name was rotation.. has a name;' Mr. Koopman said. ad,"They're doing the same thing all In oddillon to its density, another "They're Sort of been. It's not like Over agoltt" quirk of the dairy Industry here aw that here.A cow's a piece of machin• The nearby city of Ontario is abou(, that It was operated almost mti ely ery. If it's brake.we try to fill IS and to con, the enneze[loo a/muW=y immigrants. The largest group if we can't. It gets replaced of this area in the China Valley neat "-were Dutch, many of whom came "Today,every cow has a number month and press ahead with the oon- before and Just after World War 11 and a page on the computer" mmctmn of subdivisions named,in a Sad quickly adapted their northern Mrs. DeSwr said she had never Itouch of fanciful marketing, for the European techniques to the hot,dry milked a cow by hand, and never properties they are replacing, like climate.There were also many Par- expected to.In the factory that IS her Cloverdale Farms and Archibald tuguese,minty tram the Acores,and hem,the employees,almost entirely Rmch. The farmers are leaking to a handful of French Basque farmers. Lathes,manage me incessantly hurt. the tulare, and even many of those These days, many farmers, like ming machinery. Who"Y they intend W stay are gen- Mrs.DeBaer and her husband Fred, "It's lust a factory is what it I%" orally unsentimmte[. still speak Dutch and visit relatives she said."If the cows don't produce "People here wee It as past,of the In their homeland perloRcally.They milk,they go to heel." business process,"said Fred Aglow. also have built extremely ttghaknit Dare result is;a conspicuous How of a former Mayor of Chino who moved communities, with their own wealth to the north. Modem milking here (rare a dairy in Los Angelo churches and Christim schools. To Plants cost about $5 million to build County four decades ago and is now a this day. the industry in Southern in Tulare,but the farmers,and their San Bernardino County supervisor. California Is dominated by the bankers, think nothing of construct- -Where you have half a million mi. Dutch, and the dairy industry in Ing them. mats now there will be 100,000 or so "These ere same of the most prof- people in a few years. We ell under- itable times ever." said Larry Zive. trod progreas." tonight,manager of agricultural lend- It pman,who Sold his farm Farmers find that ing at the Citlrens Business Bacot, hem tan year and We spends a the biggest local farm lender here. week a month m a big dairy he SUbdIV1S1ORS Can "Feed class are low,milk prim are partly owns Ia New Mexico,named. high.There's a lot of money going to It'll be a little sad to see everyone bring new vitality. these Inmates Sow." go," Mr. Kmpman said, "but it Forms here, Mr. Zivelongid said, makes sense Imo a bushes and usually generate$M.000 to x3OSION environmental perspective." a month in milk sales, and low de, There in even a sense among some northern Cemomia, toward the top fault rates have been mkdmal. farmers Nat,good as Chino has been of the Central Valley is daminated "The risk of leading In this bos4 to them economically,the growth of by Portuguese families.As the Dutch nests ban been nominal almost zero;' the deity Warrens was too =can. lmmigranes in China have roved to he said. "I don't know taw many traced without enough planning.The TWare• among the first things they business you can say Net about" torrent ratio of slam 2;cows to an hem done Is construct a new net- But now the bame are being re- acre here is among the highest m the work of churches and sehcols. placed with handsomely dcdgned m- i world That has created envHmmen- The last time the industry was try gates topped with sales Winners tat coacems that in leant Some of the forced to move, it also pulled up and signs offemig battles at$200,000 farmers wW be glad to k ave behind stakes M a hurry. Joel Splmsky, a antl up. Within a mile or so of Mrs. for mare spacious farms that. for Dndessar of geography at California Definer's (arm are new shopping now at least, are tulles from the State University at Long Beach and centers with everything Isom a giant nearest strbdlvlsbn. the author of a history of the dairy Ratphs supermarket in dry cleaning "None of these farms ever should business here, said Nat as recently shops and a floras club. t have been here realty," said Mm as 1962 the Sown of Dairy Valley,ant A huge bummed in front at a Sap Definer,as she pointed to the berms of the centers of the industry in sus acre spread indictment bWmrdif4mla thrown up amend many of the fields Angeles County.had 3.505 people and Smooth. proclalms: "The Comm m an effort to contain the dangerous 85.000 cows. Valley.Worth the Wait"The former y wash of manure and water spread by 1t was not king after that that dairy is being turned into a plowed winter Roods. "No one Over thought rising taxes, changing policies re- community. about the future. It was way tot garding the use of land and environ. Such grandiose projects have ec- dense.What happened here will nev- mental concerns aver growing ma- celerated the cowry's pressure m er happen again, anywhere in the more,piles forced the farmers to build the remaining farmers to clam up world The county cloud their eyes their larger and more efficient oper. the envinn ment. Most of the(arms to what wall happening In the val- alims in the Chino Valley.Today,the are surrounded by berms meom W ley." town of Dairy Valley is caged Cent. contain the Spread of water cmtaml- Before the development of modem tes. It has a population of 0,240 news with manure wall It good.in refrigeration, processing and flitra. people,and no cows. the winter. The county Is Soso de, ties methods,dairy farms needed on Initially.Regrowth of the industry manding that the dairies ship mi the .t We closer to Nair markets,Said So m in the Chino Valley was encouraged 90a,0m tone of manure they pmduce ;,;e Me early part of the century a big with few restrictions or erwiresmm. every year, as well as the 2 mWlm an: in south6latom Los Angeles tall concerns. Them am now about tons of manure eminently seockplled County became home to a cluster of 880laws Sol average on each farm m "Far 25 years I restated it," eel (arms feeding the appetites of a rap. Chino.with many having 0,000 or so, Mr.Feemlra,of the Milk Producers idly growing metropolis compared with a national average of Council. "We finally realized we De[rying became So important to fewer Nan 50 cows per farm. needed to take seen. responsibility the ]we[ ecanamy that when a last The farms are operated with ma- Wlthm maybe five years,thin will b Angeles entirety see[ was crewed In chine-like imensien and a pure bull. largely gone." the 19"'..the business ones honored more philosophy.Asked if their cows He added: "It's a way of We for an the emblem. On Re seal were had mines,me farmers here chuck- Neu people it's a gem.But It's not figures representing the pillars of led - the land,It's Me business they Iola' ".I.SCAPMONTHLY UPDATE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT PLAN- Novem er. 1999 Upcoming Meetings A Message from the Executive Director... y I'm outraged. 5 Annual Holiday Luncheon, Tuesday, December 7, 12:00— Last month I wrote about risk communication and Dr. Peter 2:00 p.m. —Once again, the charming Sandman and the seminar that was being held to discuss the El Adobe de Capistrano restaurant in dynamics of outrage—that singular emotion that propels the San Juan Capistrano will be the setting average citizen from apathetic bystander to enraged activist. The for the annual Holiday Luncheon, workshop was challenging, fascinating, informative—and counter- featuring the San Clemente High School intuitive. For Dr. Sandman challenged some of the very core Madrigal singers as well as a recap of beliefs and actions of my beloved industry. I left the seminar the events of the past year from our almost a believer, but still hesitant to fully embrace his ideas. For committee chairs. Please contact Kris at in my rational brain, I still believed that if you just laid out the fads the SCAP office (949.489.7676) to make of an issue, reasonableness would prevail. reservations. Today, I stand among the true believers, because a funny thing Board of Directors: The Board will happened on Monday. I felt the upwelling of outrage, and I meet at the AWMA/SERRA offices in San became the enraged activist. At the excellent CASA-sponsored SB 709 Mandatory Penalties Workshop, I listened to some of the Juan Capistrano at 9:30 a.m. prior to best and brightest in my industry tell me that 1)certain violations the Holiday Luncheon on December 7. of an NPDES permit will trigger an automatic $3,000 penalty; 2) Cease & Desist Orders and compliance time schedules don't Air Committee: The Air Committee protect you from penalties and 3)this poorly crafted piece of uh, will meet on Tuesday, November 16, legislation, was attached as a trailer to the state's budget bill—no from 1:00.3:00 p.m. at LACSD in committee hearings and no opportunity for commenttchange from Whittler. folks like us. Biosolids Committee: The Now, I can hear you thinking to yourself, "Ray, Raaay, you're Biosolids Committee will meet Tuesday, overreacting— pull yourself together guy!" Ah, but you see, that is November 16, from 10:00— 12:00 at the pernicious nature of outrage. When outrage is high, perceived LACSD in Whittier. risk is high also. As I pondered the possibility of a cash-strapped agency racking up hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for Water Committee: The Water say, chlorine residual violations, the more outraged I became. Committee will meet on Tuesday, November 30, from 10:00-12:00 at Suddenly, in a moment of remarkable clarity(luckily, the OCSD in Fountain Valley. rational part of my brain works overtime), I realized Dr. Sandman was right. If you feel powerless and oppressed, you are outraged. I felt a momentary kinship with the environmental and community activists, many of whom I have at times referred to as "wackos , and I understood. If you manage the outrage, you will reduce the perception of the hazard. If this bill hadn't been crammed down our throats without any opportunity to comment and hadn't been so poorly written that much is left to the interpretation of the regulators, would there have been outrage? I don't think so. In fact, and many of you may be outraged at me for saying this, but we brought some of this on ourselves. Every time we failed to take responsibility for our problems, or ignored or pooh-poohed the activists, we triggered outrage. And those outraged activists have their revenge—it's called SB 709. 30290 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE 113 . SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 . PHONE (949)489 7676 . TAX (949)489-0150 Monthly Update 2 November, 1999 , So, where do we go from here? Are we really powerless? Of course not. A potentially untenable burden is about to be placed on communities that can least afford it. Important issues of due process are being wiped away, leaving Regional Boards with little discretionary ability. Our organization and others will alert reasonable legislators who will look at these issues and want to address them. But as CASA's Bobbi Larson warned, "It's a give and take process, and if you open it up for amendment, something else may be given away." Unfortunately for this situation, Dr. Sandman's workshop was about preventing and reducing outrage. He also gives one on how to provoke outrage and use it effectively. Perhaps we should have him back to give us that one 0. Outrageously yours, Ray Miller Board Of Directors Meet Litigation Funding Update—At their October 21 meeting, the Board was advised that the $37,500 that SCAP had advanced to CASA for legal fees associated with the Sacramento 303(d)frMDL lawsuit would be refunded back to SCAP. CASA has decided to bill all member agencies individually to avoid the potential for double payments if agencies belong to both CASA and SCAP. In other news, Sacramento has proposed a settlement, but there are doubts that it will be accepted by the SWRCB and two Regional Boards that are involved. In the NRDC Notice of Intent (NOI) litigation, no significant involvement has been offered to POTWs (or other agencies) in the development of the Guidance Manual for developing TMDLs. Since this involvement was a key element in the decision by POTWs to forgo a lawsuit, reevaluation of that position is proceeding. NPDES Permit Database —Water Committee Chair Bob Ghirelli briefed the Board on a proposal to create a database of NPDES permit information containing all 53 member agencies' requirements. Larry Walker Associates created a similar database of information for the Bay Area Dischargers Association in northern California. Information regarding numeric and narrative limitations, permit issuance and renewal dates, applicable Regional Board, etc., would be entered into a Microsoft Access database. Database information would be available to all members, as would database search information. The initial estimated cost for this effort is $79,456. While the Board generally endorsed the concept, they asked that the effort and cost be further refined and brought back to them. Salinity Coalition —Chair Ghirelli also briefed the Board on issues surrounding the Salinity Coalition and the potential effects that local desalters and brine disposal to sewer systems and outfalls could have. Bob is authoring an issue paper discussing these impacts; the paper will be circulated for comment by the end of the year. The paper will be presented at the next Coalition meeting in January. Biosoltds/Air Issues —The Board was briefed on the most recent developments on these issues; they are discussed in greater detail further in this Update. Water SB709 Mandatory Penalties Workshop Over 100 cities and special districts attended a CASA/League of Cities sponsored workshop that detailed "What you should know about Mandatory Penalties under SB 709." This recently enacted legislation, which in Monthly Update 3 November, 1999 previous years was vetoed by Governor Wilson, was sponsored by CaIPIRG and promoted to legislators as a way to reign in 'polluters that are running wild and Regional Boards that aren't minding the store." Because it was attached as a trailer to the state budget bill, tt did not go through the normal committee hearings, and POTWs were provided minimal opportunities to comment or negotiate changes. The law takes effect January 1, 2000 and applies to all NPDES permit holders; it doesn't currently apply to direct On the Lighter Side discharging industries. The bill discusses pollution prevention issues, but the core provision is that once a violation is In a variation of the"Man bites Dog" established, the Regional Board MUST assess penalties-they story,the Encina Wastewater Authority have no enforcement discretion. in Carlsbad was recently featured in a San Diego Union that had a twist on the According to Bobbi Larson, a mandatory minimum penalty of usual odor story. $3,000 applies to two types of violations: 'serious' and It seems that two years ago a 'repeat" The criteria for each of these is complex, and because vegetable roasting factory moved next of the poor way the bill was constructed, many issues are left door to the sewage plant-and undefined, unexplained and unclear. Briefly, serious violations subsequently racked up at least a dozen include: 1) exceeding permit limits by 20% for Group II AQMD violations. The culprit: garlic. pollutants such as cyanide, residual chlorine and certain metals; Encina General Manager, Mike Hogan 2) exceeding permit limits by 40% for Group 1 pollutants such is not complaining: "Obviously we've as BOD, solids, nutrients, minerals, detergents (MBAS) and noticed the garlic smell at our plant site. oils. It can be rather strong,although it doesn't bother us." The $3,000 penalty will be applied for each violation if: 1) it A Cut Above roasts everything from is the first serious violation in any six month period 2) if two or zucchini to bell peppers at their plant more violations occur within any six month period (could be a and thought their move next to the continuous six-month period or a defined one); or 3) if a sewage plant was the ideal location. discharger fails to perform certain tasks four or more times in However, Encina has spent millions over any six-month period (file a report, exceeds a limit, files an the last 10 years to contain and scrub incomplete report or exceeds toxicity limits under certain permit malodorous smells-they haven't conditions). received a complaint in over a year. Perhaps the most disturbing provision of the law is that these The factory is working to contain penalties will a you have a Cease and Desist Order odors,but apparently,not everyone is P PPY even if Y bothered by the smell,and they attribute that provides interim limits or a time schedule for compliance, or the aroma to the sewage plant, if you have negotiated a permit that contains limitations that both you and the Regional Board knew were unachievable, but "We've had people say'I don't know had received verbal confirmation from Board staff that they what you're doing down there but keep would not pursue such violations. Because of this provision, it doing it." Hogan said. is almost certain that several agencies will immediately be [Editor's note: Clearly there is facing fines on January 1. Depending upon the interpretation needed research to be done in this area. the State Board gives to determining the six-month period and perhaps W ERF could fund the study: how continuous monitoring violations are defined, some 'The efficacy of garlic fragrance when agencies are projecting first year violations in the some to used to mask sewage odors."] hundreds of thousands of dollars. Margie Nellor of LACSD recommended, among other things, that POTWs refamiliarize themselves with their NPDES permit requirements, and make sure that laboratory, field, engineering, operations and monitoring staff are informed about the penalties and all staff persons and contracted businesses are very familiar with sampling procedures and analytical methodologies. Larry Walker of LWA recommended strategies for beginning early permit renewal negotiations. Monthly Update 4 November, 1999 I If you were unable to attend the workshop and would like a copy of the handouts, please contact Kris in the office. Risk Communication Workshop "There's an old joke at the Sanitation District that goes something like this: 'Why is it that Anaheim got Disneyland and Huntington Beach got the sewage treatment plant9 Well, it's because Huntington Beach got first choice." [Blake Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District, opening remarks) Unfortunately, as Mr. Anderson went on to say, people love clean water and hate sewage treatment plants. Worse, in controversial situations, the logical information and arguments POTWs present seem to actually worsen the situation. According to risk communication professor, consultant and writer, Dr. Peter Sandman, people are normally apathetic about risk—until they are triggered by outrage to do something about the real or imagined hazard. When outrage is high, perceived risk is also high. In other words, people can believe something is dangerous simply because they are upset about it. Studies have shown that there is a very low correlation between the risks that frequently kill people (disease, car accidents) versus the ones the public is concerned about (contaminated water, airplane accidents). Outrage is as much a part of the risk management job as hazard. Adding to this, Sandman says, is the fact that there are four publics: 1) fanatics (usually 20 or fewer people); 2) attentives (may number in the 100s depending on the issue); 3) browsers (read newspapers and may monitor your issue) and' 4) inattentives (the bulk of the population). Of the four, the most important public is the fanatics: your issue is their main interest in life besides their job and family. The other three publics rely on the fanatics to monitor your issue. If fanatics are moved to outrage, nothing you do will placate them, says Sandman, and they will try to move the other three publics to outrage also. How do you proactively avoid outrage? Among other things, he suggests that you have a public involvement program that seeks out your fanatics, attentives and browsers and involves them in the important issues facing your agency early on. Acknowledge your problems, don't keep secrets, treat them with courtesy, show compassion for their concerns, don't bury them in data and make your interactions with them personal. Sandman cautions that public involvement is most effective when there is no outrage; if outrage exists, there will be no interest in public involvement because you will not be perceived as trustworthy. How do you respond to outrage in the midst of a crisis? The following paragraphs on how Dr. Sandman's principals were recently applied to the Huntington Beach spill situation is an effective example of this. Avoidina Outrage in Huntington Beach When the news about the closure of miles of some of Huntington Beach's prime beaches hit the newspapers due to high bacterial counts, media coverage initially focused on the Orange County Sanitation District's efforts (or lack thereof)to discover the source of the contamination, and an OCSD employee's speculation that the cause was due to sewage. However, within days, media coverage—as well as activist statements—reflected a very different story: that the District was doing everything it could to find the source of the problem and that frustratingly, they were baffled as to what could be the cause. By the time the beaches were reopened, not only were the Districts being hailed for their efforts, but the "fanatics" were defending the POTW and pointing fingers at other parties. During a discussion of what they learned and what worked in diffusing outrage in this crisis, OCSD's Blake Anderson noted that as important as the technical efforts were to finding out what was wrong, it was the creation i ] Monthly Update 5 November, 1999 of the afternoon staff/media meetings, as well as the immediate availability of the District's communications director, that made the difference. "We had to have a mechanism to communicate to our people what was going on each day and we decided that we would have to open it up to the activists/critics as well as the media,"Anderson said. "It was very difficult to do because this was not only the first information that many of our senior staff would hear each day on our efforts, but there was no chance to filter or make palatable the information that would be disseminated. They saw the worst: we were often uncertain, mystified, frustrated and confused—and they saw it all. But they also saw the amount of money we were spending, the hours and hours of staff time that everyone was putting in, and they were able to offer their ideas and opinions freely." Another advantage presented by the daily meetings: the media had everyone they needed to talk with in the room at the same time. Also attending the meetings: the City Administrator and Chief of Police from Huntington Beach; representatives from the State Parks and Recreation Department who had responsibility for many of the miles of closed beaches; county health officials; Regional Board staff and representatives from the local Congressman and Assemblyman's offices. The Surfrider representatives were joined by reps from Huntington Beach homeowner associations, as well as reporters from the Orange County Register and Los Angeles Times. If the media wanted a quote or an interview, they only had to walk across the room to get it. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications for OCSD added: "I never wrote one press release—but I was at the closed beach every morning by 7:00 a.m. to be available to brief the press on overnight events and to organize the afternoon meetings. The media had my pager, office and cell phone numbers as well as my home phone number—and was literally available 24 hours a day. Every conversation started with 'Are you on a deadline? If I needed to find out additional information, I got back to them within 10-15 minutes. A relationship built on trust was slowly developed—a relationship that will endure." When asked what they would do differently, Blake said, 'We jumped to some conclusions early on [high bacteria levels were due to human waste], that took us a lot of time and money to dispel. However, because we did do such a thorough job of looking for every possible lead, by the time our attention turned to urban runoff as the source of the pollution, the group was convinced that it couldn't be us." OCSD is convinced that their openness made the difference in avoiding outrage and building relationships that will assist them in future controversies. "It's difficult to measure the success of our approach," Blake noted. "But it would be easy to see if it had failed." Biosolids Kern County On October 12, the Kern County Board of Supervisors approved a biosolids ordinance that will phase out the application of Class B biosolids within three years, and impose a $3.37/ton trucking impact fee on biosolids load originating outside of the county. LACSD, OCSD and the City of Los Angeles are reviewing the way CEOA issues were addressed for the ordinance and evaluating their legal options. CASA may also become involved as the issue has statewide implications. Monthly Update 6 November, 1999, In related news, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors will be reviewing an ordinance that would completely ban biosolids use. The impetus for the proposal came from one of the agricultural groups involved in the Kem County ordinance. The Biosolids Committee will be setting up a meeting to review the implications of these actions and develop short and long-term strategies continuing biosolids disposal options. Synagro Update Odor complaints are continuing to be lodged against Synagro [the successor to Recyc, Inc.) in Corona. The County is continuing their efforts to limit the facility to 250 tpd, however Synagro has advised that they are .not honoring the order.' Civil action is proceeding as some POTWs have received a subpoena for their records from Riverside County. Air EPA Draft 1996 National Toxics Inventory EPA has released a draft National Toxics (Emissions) Inventory for 1996. The inventory contains emission estimates of 188 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from various sources including POTWs. The inventory will be used by EPA in developing regulations and implementing programs mandated by the Clean Air Act. POTWs submitted comments on the listing asking that AB2588 emissions data be used instead of the very conservative emissions estimates used by the EPA. In addition, California POTW emissions were double counted as both major and area sources in the inventory—even though none of the POTWs are above the Title III toxic major source thresholds. POTW MACT Standard In 1998, EPA released the proposed Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standard for POTW emissions for comment. While no control equipment was proposed for existing plants, for new or reconstructed plants, covers on primary treatment units would be required and all covered facilities would have to be vented to a control device. To determine MACT, however, the EPA's Water 8 model was the default model used to determine major sources; this model overestimates emissions from POTWs. In a positive turn of events, EPA has recently indicated to AMSA that they plan to remove this language and leave the methodology for major sources up to the local permitting authority. Non Sequitur "Fall seven times, stand up eight." -Japanese Proverb Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 27, 1999 �JN ANITgT�Oy c 9 O y Fcl/NQ TH �NV� OV• ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on October 27, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo A John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater A Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts A Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; John Linder, Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterrnan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Layne Baroldi; Jim Herberg; Chuck Wnsor, Angie Anderson; Mike Moore; George Robertson; Sam Mowbry; Jim Colston; Jeff Armstrong; Charlie McGee; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Tom Nixon; Mary Lee; Don Hughes; Kris Lindstrom; Leslie Moulton; Tom Dawes; Bill Knopf; Kelly Bum-Lucht; Dave Garofalo; Garry Brown; Jon Ely; Terry Lane; Fred Cardenas; Dave Schlesinger, Augie Caires; Dan McMillan; Jay Goldby; Jim Howell; Paul Cooley; Ed Winamer, Doug Isbell; John Lippitt Minutes for Board Meeting j 10/27/99 Page 3 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Acencv Active Director Alternate Director Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson' Mark Schwing REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Debay introduced special guests from San Diego who spent the day at the Sanitation District, met with senior staff and some Directors, and attended the Steering Committee meeting that evening to learn about the District's governance system, financial systems and operations. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, was recognized who updated the Directors on the beach closure incident in Huntington Beach. A final report was being prepared and would be ready for the November lr board meeting. OCSD and OCWD were co-hosting a reception on October 28"for former US Senator Paul Simon and all Directors were encouraged to attend. Senator Simon was to speak regarding the importance of responsible water-resource management and of the proposed groundwater replenishment system. Chair Debay then reported that 1,500 ultra-low-flush toilets were distributed on October 23n° during the toilet giveaway program co-sponsored by the District. The toilets were given free of charge to residents in the District's service area. The program is underwritten by the District, OCWD, Municipal Water District and Metropolitan Water District. It was also announced that the Planning, Design and Construction Committee would be meeting on November 0 at the Edison Field in Anaheim due to a League of California Cities meeting that was to be held the same evening. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to former Director of General Services Administration Ed Hodges for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager recognized the guests from San Diego and offered assistance if needed. Mr. McIntyre then announced that Chair Jan Debay was also now president of the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 22, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 Page 4 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and 'B', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/99 09/30/99 Totals $7.114,774.38 $4,260,360.77 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the October 27, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 22, 1999 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the October 6, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 6, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve recommendation to donate surplus lab equipment and supplies to the University of California, Irvine for use by Dr. Betty Olson, with an estimated value of$5,500. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with The Yakima Company for the management of the District's biosolids; and 2) authorize staff to negotiate with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for the purchase of a site for long-tens management of the District's biosolids. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN,AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the October 7, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 7, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District for construction costs associated with the relocation of the sewer line for East Garden Grove Wmtersburg Channel Improvement, Contract No. 11-17-2, for an additional amount of$200.481.22, increasing the total amount not to exceed $325,481.22. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 Page 5 d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 8-12, with Mike Pdich&Sons, authorizing an addition of$96,969, increasing the total contract amount to$2,489,765; 2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12,with Mike Pdich &Sons, authorizing a deduction of$99,750, decreasing the total contract amount to$2,390,015; and 3)Accept Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,107,320 for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, for a total project budget of$5,027,720; 2)Approve a budget amendment of$256,852 for Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for a total project budget of$4,329,752; 3)Approve plans and specifications for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20; 4)Approve Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications; 5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 6)Award contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for an amount not to exceed $6,325,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC Services, Inc.for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of $229,187. increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $2,350,935. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget amendment of $6,069,661 to Area Classification Studies Implementation Plan, Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35,for a revised total project cost of$7,214,661. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance.Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the October 13, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held October 13, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of September 1999. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify the decision of the General Manager and authorize him to waive the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC), pursuant to District's Ordinance No. OCSD99-01, Section 305.6, regarding issuance of the Special Purpose Discharge Permits to the City of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to allow urban runoff to be discharged to the District's wastewater system for a one-year period effective November 1, 1999. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 ' Page 6 e. Directors entered into a discussion and asked questions of staff. It was then: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-18, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures, Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Relating tot) Adjust the Assistant General Manager's pay range (E20) maximum from $136,680 to $148,836; 2) Move the Director of Information Technology classification from pay range E17 ($75,876- $119,784) to pay range E18 ($85,992-$139,464); 3) Move the Warehouse Supervisor classification from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236) to pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156); 4) Move the Contracts & Purchasing Supervisor classification from pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156)to pay range Ell ($60,828-$86,064); 5) Create Contracts Specialist classification at pay range E2 ($39,252-$55,488); 6) Create Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,064- $70,848); 7) Reinstate the Safety and Emergency Response Specialist classification at pay range E8 ($52,500-$74,292); and 8) Create Information Technology Strategic Implementation Leader classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86,064). 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins,Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on September 28 and October 12, 1999 to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve plans and specifications for Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-55;2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Ararat Construction Co., Inc. dba Ark Construction Co. for Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-55, for an amount not to exceed $243,000. 17. Actions re Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan, prepared by Environmental Science Associates: a. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, gave a brief report on the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jon Ely, representing the Southeast Neighborhood Association of Huntington Beach of approximately 1,600 homes, requested the comment period be given an extended deadline. Although he liked Scenario 2 for the District's treatment operational plan, he didn't think it was realistic. Garry Brown, representing the Orange County Coastkeepers, stated his organization was not able to respond to the EIR as they are newly organized. Their preference, however, is for full secondary treatment. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 Page 7 Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion to extend the comment period forthe EIR. It was moved and seconded to extend the approval of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan to November 17, 1999, The motion failed with 5 aye votes and 14 nay votes. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the written comments received for the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan be received and ordered filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan prepared by Environmental Science Associates. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-19, Making Certain Findings Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan; adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-20, Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan has been completed in compliance with CEQA. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-21 adopting the 1999 Strategic Plan and designating Scenario 2, the"Preferred Alternative"as the District's new treatment operational plan. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination. 18. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos. 18(a)(1), (2) and (3). CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 9:15 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 18(a)(1), (2) and (3). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 18(a)(4), and no report was given. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:37 p.m.,the Board reconvened in regular session. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/27/99 ' Page 8 ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Secretary of a Board of eoM of Orange Coun`y Sanitation,District HAwp.cta�genda%Board Mlnutes\1999 Board Knutes*92299.dx Claims Paid From 911199 to 9/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 21797 RPI/Bio Gro 9 87,394.81 Residuals Removal MO 4-26.95 21798 Blue Cross of California 176,626.02 Medical Insurance Premium 21799 Bristol Systems, Inc. 47,160.42 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 21800 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 29.119.44 12 Computer Workstations& 1 Dell Inspiron Notebook Computer 21801 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 75,736.80 Natural Gas-Spec a P-170 21802 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 42.471.50 Consulting Services-FIS Support 21803 Hewlett-Packard 60,640.65 Lab Supplies 21804 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 26,773.25 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 21805 Pacific Investment Management Co. 121,809.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95.97 21806 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 121,500.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21807 Southern California Edison 74,326.54 Power 21808 StudioVisia 25,360.00 Computer Consulting Services 21809 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 34,969.32 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21810 U.S.Geological Survey 92,000.00 Ocean Monitoring Program-Bottom Mapping 21811 Ark Construction Company 66,612.96 Construction Pi-444 21812 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 136,896.75 Construction 132-65 21813 Southern Contracting Company 201,571.00 Construction P247-1 Or 21814 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,998.58 Long Distance Telephone Service y 21815 Great American Printing Co. 131.53 Office Supplies .- 21816 Aearo Company 1,540.00 Safety Supplies 21817 Airborne Express 31.15 Air Freight 21818 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 1,718.47 Plumbing Supplies 21819 American Airlines 6,840.94 Travel Services 21820 American Fisheries Society 198.45 Publication 21821 American Management Association 1,425.00 Registration 21822 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 472.00 Lab Supplies 21823 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 21824 Appleone Employment Service 12,003.13 Temporary Employment Services 21825 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 610.94 Audio Video Services 21826 Awards&Trophies By Bea 42.02 Plaques 21827 AMAI/Keys Productivity Center 159.00 Registration 21828 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Service 21829 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 120.16 Telephone Service 21830 AT&T Wireless Service 4,073.36 Cellular Telephone Service 21831 AT&T Wireless Service 9,490.42 Cellular Telephone Service 21832 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 21833 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 415.02 Electrical Supplies 21834 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 3,893.18 Telephone Installation 21835 Battelle 5,162.00 Engineering Services Pi-51 Page 1 of 14 Claims Paid From 911199 to 911118/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21836 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries 21837 Bell Pipe 8 Supply Co. 450.50 Valve Supplies 21838 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 27.76 Office Supplies 21839 Big Tex Trailers 4,635.93 20 Ft. Utility Trailer 21840 Boise Radiator Service 380.38 Truck Repairs 21841 Builders Book, Inc. 201.26 Publication 21842 Bureau of National Affairs 1,648.58 Subscription 21843 Business Objects Users Conference 795.00 Registration 21844 C.S.U.F. Foundation 8,750.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 21845 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 9.21 Service Agreement 21846 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 21647 Camel Corp. 10,672.46 UPS Batteries 21848 Canus Corporation 16,225.99 Fiber Optic Cable 21849 Cad R. Nelson, P.E. 250.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 21850 Carlton V. Philips,Jr. 1,208.15 Legal Service-Porter Plating 21851 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 3,399.00 Engineering Services P1-62 21852 W.A.Chamslrom Co., Inc. 740.70 Once Supplies 21853 Chem Lab Supplies 213.35 Chemical n 21854 City of Fountain Valley 122.47 Sewer Line Inspection 3-35R Y 21655 Clemson University 4,770.00 Training Registration r� 21856 Coast Fire Equipment 5.942.91 Service Agreement 21857 Cole-Partner Instrument Co. 217.17 Lab Supplies 21858 Compaq Computer Corporation 717.62 Computer Supplies 21859 Compressor Components Of California 1,293.00 Pump Supplies 21860 Connell GM Parts 49.45 Truck Supplies 21861 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 4,104.52 Electrical Supplies 21862 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 14.81 Plumbing Supplies 21863 Continental Construction 3,338.61 Service Contract- Electrical Repair 21864 Converse Consultants 159.50 Testing Services P2-65 21865 Cooper Energy Services 4,556.72 Engine Supplies 21866 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 21867 Corporate Express Imaging 321.10 Misc. Computer Supplies 21868 Corporate Express 1,020.27 Office Supplies 21869 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.94 Truck Parts 21870 Cotelligent 271.25 Professional Services-Computer 21871 County of Orange 99.00 Permit Fees 21872 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,038.80 Electrical Supplies 21873 Creative Business Concepts 375.25 Professional Service-Computer 21874 CH2M Hill 3.683.62 Professional Service-Odor Screening 21875 Confidential Mgt. Services, Inc. 552.53 Investigation Service Page 2 of 14 ^ Claims Paid From 911199 to 9116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21876 CPI-The Altemalve Supplier, Inc. 1,867.12 Lab Supplies 21877 CWEA Membership 45.00 Membership 21878 Dapper Tire Co. 707.94 Truck Tires 21879 David R.Woodruff,Agricultural Consultant 7,930.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Sites Soil Sampling&Analysis 21880 David's Tree Service 4,675.00 Tree Removal 21881 Debin Enterprises 3,327.32 Hot Water Boiler-Admin. Bldg. 21882 DeZurik C/O Miscu/Southwest 678.83 Valves 21883 Don Maurer 2,520.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 21884 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 197.29 Paint Supplies 21885 Electronic Transmission Smog System 20.70 Electrical Supplies 21886 Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 21887 Environmental Data Solutions Grips,L.L.0 9,600.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into.Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project 21888 Environmental Express 1,616.67 Lab Supplies 21889 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,205.57 Professional Services-Legislative 21890 F. H. Pumps 1,304.03 Pump Supplies p 21891 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 257.72 Maint. Service Agreement & 21892 Faxpress, Inc. 2,248.63 Office Supplies r' 21893 FedEx Corporation 155.24 Air Freight n 21894 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription 7 21895 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,448.03 Lab Supplies w 21896 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 50.00 Concrete Cutting 21897 Fountain Valley Camera 66.67 Photo Supplies 21898 Foxboro Company 18.71 Publication 21899 Franklin Covey 794.85 Office Supplies 21900 Gamatl-Callahan Company 2,465.32 Chemicals 21901 GTE California 1,555.55 Telephone Services 21902 Gierich-Mitchell, Inc. 11,487.24 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 21903 Glenn Lukos&Associates 8,168.54 Engineering Service 241 21904 Glenn's Tackle Shop 10.45 Lab Supplies 21905 Graphic Distributors 661A6 Photographic Supplies 21906 GTE 14,427.42 Telephone Services 21907 Hach Company 1,881.77 Lab Supplies 21908 Hamilton Company 78.68 Lab Supplies 21909 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 38.15 Plumbing Supplies 21910 Hatch&10rk, Inc. 711.15 Truck Supplies 21911 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 597.30 Catering Services 21912 Hill. Inc. 348.24 Tools 21913 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 304.37 Compressor Parts 21914 Home Depot 110.25 Small Hardware 21915 City of Huntington Beach 14,638.61 Water Use Page 3 of 14 Claims Paid From 9/1199 to 9/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21916 Industrial Air Compressor 2.801.50 Equipment Rental 21917 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmonary Mgmt 6,946.00 On-Site Pulmonary 8 Audiometric Testing 21918 StateNet 200.00 Online Service 21919 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 688.27 Lab Supplies 21920 Inside CAL/EPA 585.00 Subscription 21921 Interstate Battery Systems 205.64 Batteries 21922 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 21923 IBM Corp. 7.595.37 Maint.Agreement-AS/400 21924 IOMA's Salary Surveys 217.95 Subscription 21926 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 959.87 Safety Supplies 21926 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,605.89 Instrument Supplies 21927 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 12,486.24 Misc.Construction Services 21928 Jay's Catering 1.120.72 Catenng Services 21929 K.S. Dunbar 8 Associates 12.375.00 Engineering Services 2-41 21930 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24.971.41 Medical Insurance Premium 21931 Kelly Paper 40.74 Paper 21932 Industrial Distribution Group 963.70 Tools r, 21933 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 319.99 Safety Supplies 21934 Lab Support 14,806.99 Temporary Employment Services b 21935 Labeltronix 827.10 Office Supplies 21936 Voided Check - - 21937 LaserAll Corp. 820.75 Printer Service Agreement 21938 La Motte Chemical Products 377.67 Sulfide Test Kit 21939 Liebert, Cassidy 8 Frierson 97.00 Registration 21940 Long Beach Line-X 990.19 Truck Supplies 21941 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2.694.98 Architectural Services 21942 MarVac Electronics 292.16 Instrument Supplies 21943 Mc Junkin Corporation 1,293.00 Plumbing Supplies 21944 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 207.28 Tools 21945 Mesa Muffler 93.89 Truck Supplies 21946 Microsoft Corporation 2,450.00 Software 21947 Milllronics, Inc. 469.22 Electrical Supplies 21948 Mission Uniform Service 3,355.23 Uniform Rentals 21949 MotoPhoto 72.88 Photographic Services 21950 N. Glantz 8 Son 565.69 Safety Supplies 21951 National Institute of Stds 8 Technology 3,655.00 Lab Supplies 21952 National Microcemp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 21953 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services 21954 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training Page 4 of 14 Claims Paid From 9/1/99 to 9116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21955 Neal Supply Co. 109.74 Plumbing Supplies 21956 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 490.00 Training Registration-Computer 21957 City of Newport Beach 73.35 Water Use 21958 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14,353,37 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 21959 The Norm Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 21960 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.140.85 Office Supplies 21961 Optio Software 1.552.21 Software Maint. 21962 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 15.74 Electrical Supplies 21963 Orrick, Heninglon&Sutcliffe 2,500.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 21964 Oxygen Service Company 981.49 Specialty Gases 21965 OCS Reprographics 2,230.21 Printing Service-Spec P-173 21966 Pacific Bell 1,846.29 Telephone Services 21967 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,533.03 Plumbing Supplies 21968 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 63.10 Mechanical Supplies 21969 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 442.80 Tires 21970 Parts Unlimited 758.35 Truck Supplies 21971 Peak Technologies 104.08 Lab Supplies 21972 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 19,114.86 Lab Supplies K 21973 Polydyne, Inc. 12,910.91 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 Y 21974 Power Maintenance International,Inc. 1.582.20 Maintenance Agreement 21975 Power Systems Testing 900.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services 21976 Precision Industries 520.22 Mechanical Supplies 21977 Primary Source 407.87 Office Furniture 21978 Prodata 179.00 Software Maint. 21979 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 21980 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair 21981 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 355.58 Basket Strainers for Polymer Use 21982 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents 21983 RPM Electric Motors 670.07 Electric Motor Repair 21984 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2.125.35 Motor Repair 21985 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 899.43 Mechanical Supplies 21986 Sears Industrial Sales 250.68 Mechanical Supplies 21987 Second-Sun 538.02 Light Fixtures 21988 Shepherd Machinery Co. 349.37 Truck Supplies 21989 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,600.30 Tools/Hardware 21990 Slemon,Larsen&Marsh 20,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 21991 Sigma Chemical Co 2,052.18 Lab Supplies 21992 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 30.29 Plumbing Supplies 21993 SoftChoice 282.31 Software 21994 Southern California Edison Company 2,231.97 Claim Settlement Page 5 of 14 Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21995 Southern California Water 66.88 Water Use 21996 Sparklefts 5,947.46 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 21997 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 365.66 Lab Supplies 21998 Sprint 32.10 Long Distance Telephone Service 21999 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service 22000 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 530.73 Office Supplies 22001 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 22002 Sunset Industrial Pans 81.56 Mechanical Supplies 22003 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 22004 Symcas-TSG 1,668.82 Consulting Services 22005 Syscem, Inc. 2,700.00 Software Maint. 22006 SKC-West, Inc. 174.49 Safety Supplies 22007 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 814.41 Electric Cart Parts 22008 Textile Engineering Associates 5.448.92 Belt Press Supplies 22009 The Merdwood Corporation 2,795.28 Professional Services-Blosolids Land Inspection 22010 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 476.56 Mechanical Supplies 22011 Thyssen Dover Elevator 150.00 Elevator Maintenance 22012 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services ri 22013 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sates 61.42 Locks&Keys Yl 22014 Tropical Plena Nursery, Inc. 16,800.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 a 22016 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 19.74 Truck Supplies 22016 Teksystems 13,468.75 Temporary Employment Services 22017 Ultra Scientific 89.28 Lab Supplies 22018 United Parcel Service 704.80 Parcel Services 22019 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,304.43 Plumbing Supplies 22020 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 187.91 Electrical Supplies 22021 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 12,735.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 22022 Vortex Ventures 575.75 Mechanical Supplies 22023 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10.203.28 Lab Supplies 22024 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards 22025 Water Environment Federation 888.25 Publication 22026 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 23,078.98 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 22027 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3.134.23 Instrument Supplies 22028 Wyatt Date Services 269.00 Publication 22029 Xerox Corporation 6,583.00 Copier Leases 22030 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 26.86 Office Supplies 22031 Robed P.Ghirelli 190.74 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 22032 John W. Swindler 120.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22033 David Rodriguez&Nylon Computer 2,317.68 Employee Computer Loan Program 22034 Selwyn D.Mansell 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Page 6 of 14 Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22035 Orange County Sanitation District 1,694.80 Petty Cash Reimb. 22036 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 26,299.05 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 22037 Nat West Markets 66,204.88 COP Letter of Credit Fees 22038 Orange County Sanitation District 422,409.71 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 22039 Orange County Water District 142,983.59 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 22040 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 108,285.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 22041 Pro Logis Trust 648,496.00 Connection Fees Refund 22042 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 720.00 Registration 22043 American Telephone&Telegmph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service 22044 AWWA 480.00 Registration 22045 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 22046 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 22D47 Connell GM Parts 380.85 Truck Supplies 22048 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 22049 Elser Constructors,Inc. 110.00 Plans&Specs Refund 22050 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 22051 GTE California 1,371.02 Telephone Services 22052 GTE Hawaii 64.27 Telephone Service-3 Way Conference Call N 22053 Harris&Company 100.00 Registration q 22054 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,101.87 Dues Deduction 22055 ISSA 200.00 Registration 22056 Labware, Inc. 3,500.00 Registration 22057 Lucci's 105.00 Meeting Expense 22058 MasTec Network Services 2,818.78 Communication Service 22059 Network Construction Services 2,487.00 Construction Services-VoicelData Bldg Rewiring Project 22D60 Oracle Open World 3,390.00 Registration 22061 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 22062 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 22063 Orange Courier 9.90 Courier Services 22064 OCFA 619.08 Dues Deduction 22065 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 22066 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 22067 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction 22068 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 471.05 Publication 22069 Schreiber Corporation 11.044.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment 22070 Shopping.Com 158.24 Publication 22071 SkillPath Seminars 5,400.00 Training Registration 22072 Softvew Computer Products 643.94 Computer Supplies 22073 Southern California Edison 7,351.17 Power 22074 State of California 125.39 Wage Garnishment Page 7 of 14 Claims Paid From 911199 to 9/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22075 SETAC 465.00 Registration 22078 ThirdWave 5,940.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project 22077 Thompson industrial Supply, Inc. 118.49 Mechanical Supplies 22078 Tri-State Seminar On4he-River 165.00 Seminar Registration 22079 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 22080 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 59.01 Lab Supplies 22081 Edward M.Torres 359.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22082 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 6,000.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 22083 Burch Ford 27,341.56 1999 Ford F-250 Truck 22084 Commercial Resources Tax Group 125,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. 22085 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 188,434.40 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 22086 Delta Dental 83,233.20 Dental Insurance Plan 22087 Dionex Corporation 51,389.84 Lab Supplies 22088 DMG-Maximus 66,870.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit 22089 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 39,095.45 Professional Services J404 [[[777 22090 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 149,587.57 Misc.Construction Services 22091 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 90.864.23 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 22092 National Plant Services, Inc. 34.906.25 Vacuum Truck Services ram: 22093 Orange County water District 49,852.80 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 Y 22094 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 25.096.94 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 m 22095 Southern California Edison 57.089.47 Power 22096 Tule RanchlMagan Fans 42.872.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 22097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 110,359.66 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 22098 Western States Chemical, Inc. 29,387.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 22099 Advanw Constructors, Inc. 108,011.70 Construction 541-1 22100 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 245,160.40 Construction 3-35R&3-11 R 22101 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 48,475.83 Construction 3-38-1 &7-17 22102 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 61,110.00 Construction 2-34R 22103 A.M. Best Company, Inc. 177.90 Subscription 22104 A-Plus Systems 4.244.04 Notices&Ads 22105 AccuStandard, Inc. 266.25 Lab Supplies 22106 Great American Printing Co. 1,996.65 Office Supplies 22107 Aidw Systems, Inc. 81.87 Electrical Supplies 22108 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 22109 Airborne Express 26.50 Air Freight 22110 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies 22111 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 218.90 Mechanical Supplies 22112 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 4,242.62 Plumbing Supplies 22113 American Agencies 55.25 Express Lanes Use 22114 Anaheim Patio&Fireside 1,400.75 Patio Furniture Page 8 of 14 Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22115 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 200.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 22116 Appleone Employment Service 16,549.31 Temporary Employment Services 22117 Applied Industrial Technology 85.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 22118 Arcus Data Security 161.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 22119 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,254.00 Vacuum Truck Services 22120 Awards&Trophies By Bea 363.38 Plaques 22121 Adsorbents&Desiccants Corp.of America 214.90 Electrical Supplies 22122 AMA 1,525.00 Registration 22123 ASCE Continuing Education 445.00 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs. 22124 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 53.12 Telephone Service 22125 AT&T Wireless Service 111.73 Cellular Telephone Service 22126 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 2,491.58 Telephone Installation 22127 Battery Specialties 20.04 Batteries 22128 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 24.34 Office Supplies 22129 Boot Barn 298.24 Reimbursable Safely Shoes 22130 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1,998.52 Engineering Service 3-38-1 22131 Bristol Systems, Inc. 16,495.00 Consulting Services-V2K Project 22132 Builders Book, Inc. 59.12 Publication 22133 California Chamber of Commerce 86.00 Subscription y 22134 Caltrol, Inc. 877.52 Valves e 22136 Conus Corporation 96.29 Fiber Optic Cable 22136 Cappo,Inc. 120.00 Registration 22137 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 530.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 22138 Carollo Engineers 11,044.28 Engineering Services P143, P2-50&J-34-1 22139 Century Paint 95.88 Paint Supplies 22140 City of Fountain Valley 15,484.40 Water Use 22141 Coast Automatic Transmission 1,262.80 Transmission Repair 22142 Compressor Components Of California 6,969.27 Pump Supplies 22143 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 8,185.30 Electrical Supplies 22144 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 65.64 Plumbing Supplies 22145 Converse Consultants 955.63 Consulting Services P2-65 22146 Cooper Energy Services 770.99 Engine Supplies 22147 Corporate Express Imaging 2,120.52 Misc.Computer Supplies 22148 Corporate Express 1.354.49 Office Supplies 22149 Cost Containment Solutions 322.60 Worker's Comp. Services 22160 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 17.05 Truck Parts 22151 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 139.98 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 22152 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,245.95 Electrical Supplies 22153 Cylec Industries 12,002.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18 22154 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 2,401.30 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers Page 9 of 14 Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22155 David's Tree Service 10,715.00 Tree Removal 22156 Del Mar Analytical 2,228.00 Biosolids Analysis 22157 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 20.429.40 10 Computer Workstations 22158 OeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 176.65 Valves 22159 Diamond H Recognition 1.754.84 Employee Service Awards 22160 Dickson's, Inc. 9,258.00 3 Portable Air Conditioners 22161 Dovatron Manufacturing So Cal 335.00 Source Control Permit Refund 22162 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 142.24 Paint Supplies 22163 Dynalco Corp 802.00 Instrument Maint. Service 22164 Edwin M. Perkins 3,808.93 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 22165 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 560.00 Safety Training 22166 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 22167 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 23,291.72 Consulting Service-FIS V2K&Support 22168 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies 22169 Fairbanks Swiss, Inc. 258.50 Maint. Service Agreement 22170 FedEx Corporation 454.99 Air Freight 22171 Filter Supply Company 27.43 Filters 22172 Fine Science Tools, Inc. 271.01 Tools rt 22173 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 578.74 Lab Supplies q 22174 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,016.01 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 22175 Fountain Valley Camera 60.40 Photo Supplies 22176 Fry's Electronics 993.55 Computer Supplies 22177 Ganshl Lumber Company 130.56 Lumber/Hardware 22178 Ganafi-Callahan Company 1,386.74 Chemicals 22179 GTE California 6,347.88 Telephone Services 22180 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 22181 WW Grainger, Inc. 569.98 Compressor Supplies 22182 Graseby S.T.I. 813.61 Engine Supplies 22183 Graybar Electric Company 1.242.97 Electrical Supplies 22184 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.32 Janitorial Supplies 22185 Haaker Equipment Company 97.96 Truck Supplies 22186 Hach Company 511.42 Lab Supplies 22187 Hams&Company 100.00 Registration 22188 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 157.55 Catering Services 22189 Hewlett-Packard 208.92 Lab Supplies 22190 Hilti, Inc. 739.36 Tools 22191 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1.793.92 Compressor Parts 22192 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium 22193 Holmes 8.Narver, Inc. 2.840.17 Engineering Services 240 22194 Home Depot 195.31 Small Hardware Page 10 of 14 n Claim Paid From 911/99 to 911&99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22195 Hub Auto Supply 102.16 Truck Parts 22196 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 871.28 Pump Supplies 22197 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 1.374.01 Lab Supplies 22198 Imaging Plus, Inc. 456.47 Office Supplies 22199 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 48.22 Lab Supplies 22200 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use 22201 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 3,263.30 Safety Supplies 22202 J&B Auto Parts 25.86 Auto Parts&Supplies 22203 J.D. Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration 22204 Jay's Catering 568.79 Catering Services 22205 Keystone Analine Corporation 4.857.12 Chemical 22208 Industrial Distribution Group 939.22 Tools 22207 Kris Kaligian 275.00 Contractual Services-Writing 22208 Lab Support 7,193.93 Temporary Employment Services 22209 LaserAll Corp. 233.18 Printer Service Agreement 22210 La Motie Chemical Products 29.22 Sulfide Test Kit 22211 Lexis-Nexis 357.94 Books& Publications 22212 Liebert,Cassidy&Frierson 800.00 Professional Service-Human Resources rt 22213 Line-X Protective Coatings 291.55 Truck Supplies 7 22214 Voided Check - - 22215 MarVac Electronics 49.33 Instrument Supplies r 22218 MasTec Network Services 8,878.80 Communication Service 22217 Matt Chlor, Inc. 1,444.85 Valves 22218 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 60.55 Plumbing Supplies 22219 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 979.93 Boxes 22220 Medlin Controls Co. 1,771.84 Instrument Supplies 22221 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,061.68 Mechanical Repairs 22222 Millitronics C/O RMB Engineering 69.40 Electrical Supplies 22223 Minnesota Western 219.89 Office Supplies 22224 Mission Uniform Service 3,459.51 Uniform Rentals 22225 Monitor Labs, Inc. 3,986.58 Instrument Maint. 22226 Moreland&Associates 23,737.75 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 22227 Motion Industries 306.37 Pump Supplies 22228 MotoPhoto 167.73 Photographic Services 22229 MGD Technologies, Inc. 9,565.00 4 Temporary Flow Monitors-Beach Closure 22230 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 7,051.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 22231 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,189.81 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 22232 Ninyo&Moore 8,338.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 22233 Norms Refrigeration 173.75 Electric Parts 22234 Odor Management, Inc. 399.02 Chemical Page 11 of 14 Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22235 Office Depot Business Services Div. 531.50 Office Supplies 22236 Orange County Pump Co. 120.68 Pump Supplies 22237 The Register 137.20 Subscription 22238 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 671.53 Electrical Supplies 22239 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,165.78 Fittings 22240 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 22241 Ortiz Fire Protection 740.00 Service Agreement 22242 Osage Systems Group 8,360.14 Computer Software 22243 Oxygen Service Company 1,037.25 Specialty Gases 22244 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 158.26 Electrical Supplies 22245 Pacific Bell 16.30 Telephone Services 22246 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 22247 Pacific Mechanical Supply 431.63 Plumbing Supplies 22248 Pagenet 1,954.49 Rental Equipment 22249 Panametrics 70.00 Battery Pack for Flow Meter 22250 Peak Technologies 1,147.62 Lab Supplies 22251 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 786.60 Filters t,. 22252 Polydyne, Inc. 16,298.92 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 22253 Praxan, Inc. 820.11 Lab Supplies Y 22254 Primary Source 16,337.92 Office Furniture ai 22255 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2.867.77 Mechanical Supplies 22256 Putzmeister 181.42 Pump Supplies 22257 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2.393.48 Trash Removal 22258 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 22259 Related Visual 419.61 Office Supplies 22260 Reliastar 20,581.94 Employee Medical Health Premium 22261 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,428.54 Life Insurance Premium 22262 Rosemount I Uniloc 675.05 Instrument Supplies 22263 Roto Rooter-S.O.C.#51 869.25 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs. 22264 Rudolph Dew&Assoc., L.L.C. 1,000.00 Career Consulting Service 22265 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 429.76 Motor Repairs 22266 RM Controls 86.73 Instrument Supplies 22267 RPM Electric Motors 1,948.09 Electric Motor Repair 22268 RSA Sutter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials 22269 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 5,500.00 Sewer Pipe Repair 22270 Sears Industrial Sales 128.60 Mechanical Supplies 22271 Seaventures 4,650.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 22272 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 3,450.84 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 22273 Second-Sun 99.09 Light Fixtures 22274 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 4,705.88 Tools Page 12 of 14 ° Claims Paid From 911199 to SMS199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22275 Shepard Machinery 444.76 Tools 22276 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 105.36 Tools/Hardware 22277 Supelco, Inc. 2,714.80 Lab Supplies 22278 So.Cal.Gas Company 15,771.60 Natural Gas 22279 Soco-Lynch Corp. 1.259.90 Janitorial Supplies 22280 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 465.30 Emission Fees 22281 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 327.39 Lab Supplies 22282 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 22283 Sun-Belt Landscape &Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 22284 Sunset Industrial Pans 113.46 Mechanical Supplies 22285 Society of Environmental Toxicology&Chemistry 555.00 Registration 22286 Solar Turbines, Inc. 308.64 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 22287 SPSS,Inc. 1,621.39 Software Upgrade 22288 The Register 1,927.80 Notices&Ads 22289 Thermo Quest 525.20 Lab Supplies 22290 Thomas Bros. Maps 15,460.00 Printing 22291 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,909.82 Mechanical Supplies 22292 Thompson Publishing Group 254.00 Publication rrt 22293 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 65.00 Locks&Keys y 22294 Tornell&Cotten 4,493.40 Legal Service-Burge w 22295 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 80.00 Seminar Registration 22296 Trident Data Systems 600.00 Professional Service-Network Security 22297 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 15,559.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 22298 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 83.19 Truck Supplies 22299 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,420.00 Lab Services 22300 Two Wheels One Planet 342.47 Bicycle Supplies 22301 TPC Training Systems, Inc. 431.00 Training Software 22302 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 2,189.00 Equipment Certification 22303 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters 22304 U.S.Postal Service 1,400.00 Postage 22305 Ultra Scientific 93.52 Lab Supplies 22306 United Parcel Service 57.77 Parcel Services 22307 Unocal Corporation 49.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1 22308 UCI Regents 100.00 Subscription 22309 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,509.21 Plumbing Supplies 22310 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 958.90 Electrical Supplies 22311 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 5,400.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 22312 Verne's Plumbing 135.00 Plumbing Supplies 22313 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.342.90 Vision Service Premium 22314 VCI Mechanical 1.640.00 Electrical Service Page 13 of 14 Claims Paid From 9/1199 to 9115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22315 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 11,022.95 Lab Supplies 22316 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,953.36 Security Guards 22317 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 950.92 Wind Sock Frame 22318 William Garrett 4,725.00 Witness Fee-Cartel 22319 Witeg Scientific 437.65 Lab Supplies 22320 Xerox Corporation 6,204.47 Copier Leases 22321 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit 22322 3CMA 295.00 Membership 22323 CNA Trust 11,979.30 Construction 541-1 22324 Union Bank of California 5,386.21 Construction 3.38.1 22325 Janice Debay 184.58 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimb. 22326 Donald F. McIntyre 643.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22327 Orange County Sanitation District 14.986.27 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 22328 Orange County Sanitation District 503.11 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,790,609.26 Payroll Disbursements 15528- 15530 Directors'Paychecks $ 1,520.04 Payroll 9/1199 n 15531 - 15531 Employee Paycheck 329.29 Adjustment b 15532- 15662 Employee Paychecks 173,876.46 Biweekly Payroll 918199 > 15663-15665 Employee Paychecks 2,873.06 Adjustment 41272.41707 Direct Deposit Statements 655,739.87 Biweekly Payroll 9/8/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 834,338.72 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,889.98 August Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 161,339.96 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation Stale Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 133.056.63 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 45.539.83 Ouarterly Liquidity Fee on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 489,826.40 Total Claims Paid 9/1199-9115199 $ 7.114.774.38 Page 14 of 14 Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 22329 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart E 610.00 Legal Services-I.N.S. Fees 22330 Orange County Sanitation District 433,195.95 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 22331 Academic Press 45.00 Publication 22332 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 1,097.06 Ceiling Tile 22333 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 130.73 Telephone Service 22334 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 22335 Cartier Corp.Training 2,600.00 Registration 22336 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 22337 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 463.19 Electrical Supplies 22338 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 181.73 Plumbing Supplies 22339 1999 CWEA S.Regional Training&Safety Conference 105.00 Registration 22340 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 22341 Employment Development Dept. 2,990.00 Reimbursable Unemployment Insurance 22342 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 11,350.80 Consulting Services-FIS Support �J 22343 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription �1 22344 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment r. 22346 GTE California 983.43 Telephone Services �. 22346 Graphic Design Book Club 31.90 Books 22347 Harbour Engineering Group 3,929.00 Pump Supplies In 22348 Harvard Business Review 85.00 Subscription 22349 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. 88.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 22350 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.116.18 Dues Deduction 22351 Irvine Ranch Water District 21.36 Water Use 22352 IBM Corp. 6,233.74 Maint.Agreement-AS1400 22353 J.D. Edwards 1.530.00 Training Registration 22354 Keystone Analine Corporation 14.144.43 Chemical 22355 MarVac Electronics 45A1 Instrument Supplies 22356 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 74.44 Tools 22357 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 44.46 Plumbing Supplies 22358 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 22359 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 22360 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 548.26 Electrical Supplies 22361 OCEA 619.08 Dues Deduction 22362 Pacific Bell 2,128.49 Telephone Services 22363 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 22364 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 22365 Peace Officers Council of CA 711.00 Dues Deduction 22366 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 2,907.11 Lab Supplies 22367 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 101.51 Freight 22368 Safety-Kleen 409.99 Service Agreement Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22369 Schneider Electric 410A8 Software Maint.Agreement 22370 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1.835.98 Tools 22371 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 247.22 Tools/Hardware 22372 So.Cal.Gas Company 3,535.79 Natural Gas 22373 State of California 132.26 Wage Garnishment 22374 Summit Steel 469.18 Metal 22375 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 22376 Corina M.Chaudhry 115.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22377 Chades F.Wnsor 589.48 Meefingrrraining Expense Reimb. 22378 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 675.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 22379 AKM Consulting Engineers 46.103.75 Consulting Services 11-20 22380 Blue Cross of California 178,665.34 Medical Insurance Premium 22381 Camllo Engineers 59,34420 Engineering Services-Pl-36-2 8.L25-4 22382 DGA Consultants, Inc. 64.150.88 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 22383 Flo-Systems,Inc. 40,916.99 Pump Supplies 22384 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 80.538.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure 22385 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 29,690.92 Belt Filter Press Supplies `Y 22386 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 37,955.63 Misc.Construction Services 22387 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,003.66 Medical Insurance Premium ~ 22388 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 69,706.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 22389 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 236,277.70 Engineering Services J-42 22390 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 220,513.73 Lab Supplies 22391 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 112,460.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 22392 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 27,906.50 Emission Fees 22393 SPEC Services, Inc. 254,895.76 Engineering Services J-33-1 22394 Tran Consulting Engineers 33,950.00 Consulting Services-Misc. Small Capital Projects 22395 Tule RanchrMagan Farms 36.146.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 22396 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 45,070.50 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 22397 WoodmB,Spradlin&Smart 94,325.84 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 22398 Ark Construction Company 67,245.12 Construction P1d44 22399 KPRS Construction Services,Inc. 69,750.00 Construction P2-65 22400 Southern Contracting Company 396,676.00 Construction P247-1 22401 Systems Integrated 33,112.14 Construction Services J-31-3 22402 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,080.70 Long Distance Telephone Service 22403 A-Plus Systems 825.60 Notices&Ads 22404 Aearo Company 904.00 Safety Supplies 22406 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies 22406 Airborne Express 91.75 Air Freight 22407 American Media,Inc. 536.00 Training Materials 22408 American Express CFC Remittances 6.920.16 Purchasing Card Program 22409 American Seals West 167.01 Gaskets Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 9/16199 to 9130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22410 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,066.72 Training Materials 22411 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 585.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 22412 Appleone Employment Service 6,361.13 Temporary Employment Services 22413 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,066.00 Vacuum Truck Services 22414 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 713.35 Waste Removal 22415 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 1.323.88 Audio Video Services 22416 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 6,950.00 Hoist 22417 Awards&Trophies By Bea 45.26 Plaques 22418 Azur Environmental 329.74 Lab Supplies 22419 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 331.75 Telephone Service 22420 AT&T Wireless Service 3.308.60 Cellular Telephone Service 22421 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 271.05 Office Supplies 22422 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,329.22 Engineering Services 3-38-1 22423 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc.Inc. 1.856.42 Compressor 22424 Bristol Systems, Inc. 19.417.92 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 22425 Brown&Caldwell 11,115.63 Engineering Services P7-37 22426 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7,016.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 22427 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 14,27524 Electrical Supplies 22428 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,895.00 Pump Supplies rt 22429 Southern California Marine Institute 20.00 Mooring Fees-Ocean Monitoring 22430 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1,133.00 Engineering Services Pi-62 22431 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 2,778.24 Office Furniture 22432 Charles P.Crowley Co. 338.00 Instrument Parts 22433 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 142.50 Professional Services-Ergonomic 22434 Sun International 289.52 Lab Supplies 22435 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 18,360.00 Professional Services- Operafional Response Procedures 22436 Computers America, Inc. 250.67 Computer Supplies 22437 Connell GM Parts 219.01 Truck Supplies 22438 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 18,521.93 Electrical Supplies 22439 Cooper Energy Services 5,798.06 Engine Supplies 22440 Corporate Express 254.40 Office Supplies 22441 Corporate Image Maintenance, Ina 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 22442 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 5.63 Truck Parts 22443 Colelligent 1.202.25 Professional Services-Computer 22444 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 2.051.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 22445 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,092.78 Communication Equipment Repair 22446 Auditor Controller Collections 17.50 Permit Fees 22447 County Wholesale Electric Co. 498.63 Electrical Supplies 22446 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 22449 Cytec Industries 16.808.58 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 22450 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22451 CNA Consulting&Engineering 16,139.00 Professional Services-Bar Code Inventory Study 22452 CPI-The Altemative Supplier, Inc. 1,753.00 Lab Supplies 22453 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 22464 CSMFO Career Development 550.00 Registration 22455 CWEA Membership 95.00 Membership 22456 1999 CWEA S.Regional Training&Safety Conference 1,110.00 Registration 22457 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis 22458 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 6,767.78 3 Computers&5 Monitors 22459 DeZunk C/O Misco/SouthWest 336.18 Valves 22460 Dionex Corporation 1,977.31 Lab Supplies 22461 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 473.56 Pelnt Supplies 22462 DOB Engineering,Inc. 2.620.00 Temporary Employment Services 22463 DME, Inc. 557.19 Compressor Parts 22464 Electronic Transmission Smog System 9.90 Electrical Supplies 22466 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 22466 Environmental Data Solutions Grips,L.L.0 3.840.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project 22467 Environmental Express 978.75 Lab Supplies 22468 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,055.87 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 22469 Fairchild Aerial Photography Collection 75.00 Photographic Service 22470 FedEx Corporation 107.26 Air Freight 22471 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 3,703.84 Plumbing Supplies 22472 Fibertron 298.15 Fiber Optic Cable 22473 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,089.32 Lab Supplies 22474 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 9.415.39 Engineering Services P-183 22475 Fountain Valley Camera 176.59 Photo Supplies 22476 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 562.50 Truck Wash Tickets 22477 FLW, Inc. 256.45 Electrical Supplies 22478 FM International,Inc. 11.956.18 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 22479 Ganahl Lumber Company 261.99 Lumber/Hardware 22480 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,221.67 Fiberglass Repair 22481 GTE California 36.49 Telephone Services 22482 Genium Publishing Corp. 126.15 Publication 22483 Gerke Consulting 3.600.00 Registration 22484 Glenn Lukas&Associates 3.640.05 Engineering Service 2-41 22486 Graphic Distributors 2.144.23 Photographic Supplies 22486 Graseby S.T.I. 816.93 Engine Supplies 22467 Haaker Equipment Company 1,006.78 Truck Supplies 22488 Hach Company 66.11 Lab Supplies 22469 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 22490 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 16.56 Plumbing Supplies 22491 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 386.00 Catering Services Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9/30199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22492 Hewlett-Packard 642.76 Lab Supplies 22493 Holtman Southwest Corporation 21,108.70 Maint. Services-Sewer Cleaning 22494 Home Depot 337.07 Small Hardware 22495 Hopkins Technical Products 4,397A8 Pump Supplies 22496 City of Huntington Beach 14.614.45 Water Use 22497 Hunts'Final Phase 1,445.00 Misc.Construction Services 22498 Idexx 7,788.02 Lab Supplies 22499 Infotec Santa Ana 1,200.00 Consulting Service-SMS Implementation 22600 Interstate Battery Systems 429.55 Batteries 22501 Irvine Photo Graphics 29.09 Photographic Services 22502 IBM Corp. 56.44 Printer Service Agreement 22503 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 193.43 Safety Supplies 22504 Jay's Catering 1,093.63 Catering Services 22605 Johnstone Supply 221.43 Electrical Supplies 22506 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 9,376.00 Engineering Services 2-41 22507 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 2,760.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 22508 Industrial Distribution Group 1,799.69 Toole 22509 Lab Support 11.695.06 Temporary Employment Services 22610 LaserAll Corp. 25.00 Printer Service Agreement rt 22511 La Motte Chemical Products 130.92 Sulfide Test Kit 22512 Lee&Ro, Inc. 18,229.79 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 t^ 22513 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,580.00 Architectural Services 22514 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 7,500.00 Engineering Services 2-37 22515 Maintenance Products,Inc. 1,823.13 Mechanical Supplies 22516 MarVac Electronics 219.30 Instrument Supplies 22517 Massachusetts Ocean Technology Network 285.00 Workshop Registration 22518 MasTec Network Services 8,878.60 Communication Equipment-Cable 22519 Mc Junkln Corp--Ontario Branch 213.95 Plumbing Supplies 22520 Minarik 1,461.56 Instrument Supplies 22521 Mission Uniform Service 3.368.37 Uniform Rentals 22522 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 289.27 Publications 22523 Monitor Labs, Inc. 120.71 Instrument Maint. 22524 Morton Salt 260.29 Sall 22525 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 22526 National Safety Council 500.00 Membership 22527 Business Training&Development Services 1,000.00 Seminar Registration 22528 Neal Supply Co. 2020 Plumbing Supplies 22529 Ninyo&Moore 16.336.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 22530 Netsol/Network Solution 11,474.61 Engineering Services-Voica/Data Cable Upgrade 22531 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.771.07 Office Supplies 22532 The Ohmart CorporationAtEGA Corp. 306.57 Instrument Supplies Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199 Warrant No. vendor Amount Description 22533 Ortiz Fire Protection 634.00 Service Agreement 22534 Oxygen Service Company 2,433.26 Specialty Gases 22535 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 25.32 Electrical Supplies 22536 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,100.81 Plumbing Supplies 22537 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 625.48 Electrical Supplies 22538 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 185.86 Mechanical Supplies 22539 Parts Unlimited 382.35 Truck Supplies 22540 Amy Poulsen 1,012.09 Watershed Mgmt.Expert 22541 Plnnade One 2,250.00 Registration 22642 Polydyne, Inc. 24.313.51 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 22543 Projects Partners 10.806.78 Temporary Employment Services 22544 Pryor Resources, Inc. 3,000.00 Training Registration 22545 Public Officials for Water Env. Reform 335.00 Conference Registration 22546 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 79.23 Mechanical Supplies 22547 Pulzmeister 130.81 Pump Supplies 22548 Quanta"Environmental Services 050.00 Analytical Service 22549 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 22550 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services r. 22551 Related Visual 1,351.67 Office Supplies 22562 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,557.36 Lire Insurance Premium 22653 Restek Corp 796.00 Training Registration 22664 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 336.16 Auto Repair 22565 Rutan&Tucker Alomeys at Law 9,581.54 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 22558 RSA Sutter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials 22557 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 480.51 Mechanical Supplies 22558 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 4,069.19 Specialty Gases 22559 Second-Sun 244.65 Light Fixtures 22560 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 22561 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 191.29 Plumbing Supplies 22562 Snap On Industrial 1,910.89 Hardware 22583 South Coast Water 20.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 22564 Sparkletts 1,908.23 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 22565 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 511.83 Janitorial Supplies 22566 Steve Casada Construction Co. 20,822.20 Construction Services-Hunt. Beach Sewer Repair 22567 Sunset Ford 342.81 Truck Supplies 22568 Super Chem Corporation 334.03 Chemicals 22569 SARBS-CWE A 320.00 Membership 22570 SCECS(S.Calif. Environmental Chemists Society) 160.00 Registration 22571 SKC-West, Inc. 889.45 Safety Supplies 22572 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 661.85 Electric Cart Parts 22573 Mag Systems 82BA5 Instrument Supplies Page 8 of 7 Claims Paid From 9/16/99 to 9130199 Wamnt No. Vendor Amount Description 22574 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,140.90 Mechanical Supplies 22575 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 22576 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 12.93 Locks&keys 22577 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 538.81 Truck Supplies 22578 Teksystems 16,375.00 Temporary Employment Services 22579 Ultra Scientific 239.87 Lab Supplies 22580 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 250.DD Membership 22581 United Parcel Service 570.63 Parcel Services 22582 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,289.94 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 22583 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,993.91 Plumbing Supplies 22584 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,353.90 Door Repair 22586 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 23,779.78 Lab Supplies 22586 Managememt Health Services, Inc. 9,460.00 On-Site Health Service 22587 Western Metro Unit 624.09 Filters 22588 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 14,528.25 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 22589 Xerox Corporation 8,510.00 Copier Leases 22690 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 33.14 Office Supplies 22591 Zemarc Corp. 2,239.59 Pump Maint.Service 22592 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Mlcrofiltration Test Unit 22593 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 1,429.46 Construction 7.17 22594 Shabbir S. Basrai 330.30 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22595 David D.Halverson 177.75 Meeting7rmining Expense Reimb. 22596 Michael L.Heinz 1,264.22 Meelingri mining Expense Relmb. 22597 Antonino Pira 1,222.06 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimb, 22598 George L.Robertson 131.60 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb, 22599 Orange County Sanitation District 987.10 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,390,544.27 Payroll Dlabumemento 15666-15813 Employee Paychecks $ 182.807.55 Biweekly Payroll 9122/99 15814- 15816 Employee Paychecks 2.806.14 Termination&Adjustment 41708-42147 Direct Deposit Statements 684,142.81 Biweekly Payroll 9122199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869.816.50 Total Claims Paid 9116199.9130199 $ 4,280,360.77 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 22600 Orange County Sanitation District $ 427.712.67 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 22601 Southern Califomla Edison 78.885.33 Power 22602 Abeam 165.01 Hardware 22603 APEX Communications 951.28 Communication Equipment Upgrade 22604 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service 22605 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 22606 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc,Inc. 53.00 Freight 22607 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 22608 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 478.05 Electrical Supplies 22609 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 323.00 Plumbing Supplies 22610 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration 22611 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 22612 Executive Excellence 2,500.00 Human Resources Software 22613 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,766.43 Plumbing Supplies 22614 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 22615 City of Fullerton 360.21 Water Use 22616 GTE California 1.667.40 Telephone Services 22617 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 57.10 Freight 22618 Harcourt Brace&Co.and Subsidiaries 86.82 Publication 22619 City of Huntington Beach 24.50 Water Use 22620 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.116.18 Dues Deduction 22621 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 22622 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 249.37 Safety Supplies 22623 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 20.149.86 Misc.Construction Services 22624 Jendham,Inc. 795.00 Registration 22625 Industrial Distribution Group 25.05 Tools 22626 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 435.60 Safety Supplies 22627 Lucci's 105.00 Meeting Expense 22628 LAOUG-Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership 22629 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 943.42 Tools 22630 Optio Software 2,850.00 Optio Forms Implementation 22631 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 22632 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 22633 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 301.55 Fittings 22634 OCEA 627.52 Dues Deduction 22835 Pacific Bell 20.14 Telephone Services 22636 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 22837 Panametrics 8.70 Freight 22638 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 22639 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 10/1199 to 10/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22640 Primary Source 634A8 O18ce Furniture 22641 Proficiency Capital Corporation 3,222.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 22642 Quest Software 2.170.00 Service Agreement 22643 Ryan Herce Products Corp. 64.11 Freight 22644 RE Hughes Co, Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies 22645 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1,400.00 Membership 22646 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 331.72 Tools/Hardware 22647 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 22648 Snap-On Incorporated 4,912.07 Tools 22649 State of California 130.23 Wage Garnishment 22650 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 6.452.19 COP Trustee Services 22651 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.830.90 Mechanical Supplies 22052 The Training Clinic 595.00 Workshop Registration 22653 United Way 307.83 Employee Contributions 22654 Donald F.McIntyre 426.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22655 Michael D. Moore 807.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22656 George L.Robertson 200.38 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimb. 22667 Henry R.Salgado 991.10 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22858 Michelle Tuchman 451.82 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22659 Marco Polo S.Velasco 370.64 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22660 Robert Bell&Fry's Electronics 599,26 Employee Computer Loan Program 22661 Robert Bell 8 NexCom 1,882.29 Employee Computer Loan Program 22662 Victor Ferguson&Micro Center 870.84 Employee Computer Loan Program 22663 Wayne Aegerter 8 Microbon Computers 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 22664 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 84,491.30 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 22585 Barclays Bank PLC 90,667.39 COP Letter of Credit 22666 RPI/Blo Gro 103,232.29 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 22667 Bristol Systems, Inc. 27,323.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 22668 Brown 8 Caldwell 151,927.97 Engineering Services P11-37 22669 Carollo Engineers 61.728.14 Engineering Services-P1 43,P2-50,J-25-4.J-34-1 8 J-59 22670 ClarkUft of Los Angeles 40,515.08 Shelving for New Warehouse 22671 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 38.480.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K 22872 Converse Consultants 31,275.69 Consulting Services-Huntington State Beach Investigation 22673 Duke Energy Trading 8 Marketing,L.L.C. 94,832.40 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 22674 James Martin 8 Co. 44,557.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO 5127/98 22675 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 79,846.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95 22676 Olsson Construction,Inc. 44,013.00 Construction 11.27 8 Grading at Plant 2 Warehouse 22677 Orange County Water District 189,311.05 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 22678 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 233,994.96 Engineering Services J-42 22679 Polydyne, Inc. 30,295.25 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 22680 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 126,289.00 Construction-Huntington Beach Investigation 8 Cleaning 84'Siphon r Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 1011/99 to 10/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22681 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 32,791.67 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 22682 Siemens Technology 39,982.50 Air Conditioner Automation System 22683 South Coast Environmental Co. 45,903.00 Plant 2 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 22684 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 28,600.00 Weed Abatement Service 22685 Tule Ranch/Magen Forms 33,158.25 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 22686 Barnard Construction Company,Inc. 586.980.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R 22687 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 399,438.21 Construction 3.38.1 22688 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 103,401.00 Construction 2-34R 22689 Union Bank of California 44,382.01 Construction 3.38.1 22690 Union Bank of California 104,233.60 Construction 3.35 22691 Action Door Repair Corporation 191.29 Door Repairs 22682 Great American Printing Co. 282.40 Office Supplies 22693 American Airlines 8,564.36 Travel Services 22694 American Sigma, Inc. 3,396.06 Instrument Pads&Supplies 22695 Angel Scientific Products 492.38 Lab Supplies 22696 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 22897 Applied Industrial Technology 84.72 Electrical Pads&Supplies 22698 Arous Data Security 117.50 OBslte Back-Up Tape Storage 22699 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 137.95 Publication 22700 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 22701 Awards&Trophies By Bea 40.14 Plaques 22702 AMSA 1,340.00 Registration 22703 AMSA 18,150.00 Membership 22704 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 45.14 Telephone Service 22705 AT&T Wireless Services 759.59 Cellular Telephone Service 22706 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 22707 Baltimore C/O K.H.Watts Co. 261.84 Electrical Supplies 22708 Banctec Inc. 1,050.08 Computer Maint. 22709 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 21.055.31 Telephone Installation 22710 Battery Specialties 441,95 Batteries 22711 Benn&Associates 1,205.00 Legal Service-541-1 22712 BloMerieux Vitek, Inc. 2.534.33 Lab Supplies 22713 Bird-B-Gone 267.63 Control Netting for Atrium in Admin. Bldg. 22714 Bolas Radiator Service 186.00 Truck Repairs 22715 Boutwell&Ennor,L.L.P. 1,000.00 Legal Services-401a Plan 22716 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 CAFR Report FY 98-99 22717 Southern California Marine Institute 10,528.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 22718 CsICOFI 150.00 Registration 22719 Cud R.Nelson,P.E. 980.00 Engineering Consultant 2.41 22720 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 681.08 Office Furniture 22721 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2.089.91 Instrument Parts Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22722 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,NA. 8,162.75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 22723 City of Garden Grove 2,270.00 Inspection Fee 3-35R 22724 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 427.22 Lab Supplies 22725 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 1.743.60 Electrical Supplies 22726 Continental Laboratory Products,Inc. 3,250.80 Lab Supplies 22727 Continental Network Services 3.533.44 Service Contract-Electrical Repair 22728 Cooper Energy Services 11,713.82 Engine Supplies 22729 Corporate Express Imaging 5.737.69 Misc.Computer Supplies 22730 Corporate Express 7,046.32 Office Supplies 22731 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 221.78 Mechanical Parts 5 Supplies 22732 Auditor Controller Collections 33.00 Permit Fees 22733 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,897.09 Electrical Supplies 22734 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 22736 CH2MHill 6,074.42 Engineering Services-J-31-4 22736 Confidential Mgt. Services, Inc. 1,541.85 Investigation Service 22737 CMTA-California Municipal Treasures Assoc. 450.00 Seminar Registration 22738 1999 CWEA SRTSC 360.00 Registration 22739 Del Mar Analytical 1.800.00 Biosolids Analysis 22740 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 19.718.24 10 Dell Computers 22741 Diamond H Recognition 437.88 Employee Service Awards 22742 Dlonex Corporation 1,642.12 Lab Supplies 22743 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 16.100.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 22744 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 552.07 Paint Supplies 22745 DOB Engineering, Inc. 18,259.00 Temporary Employment Services 22746 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,804.65 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 22747 Eberhard Equipment 135.15 Tractor Repair 22748 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 145.00 Medical Screening 22749 Electre-Bond 5.602.27 Pump Supplies 22750 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 3,050.00 Safety Training 22751 Enchanter, Inc. 4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 22752 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 12,606.99 Professional Services J-404 22753 Faxpress, Inc. 2,591.44 Office Supplies 22764 FedEx Corporation 24.36 Air Freight 22755 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 119.39 Plumbing Supplies 22756 Fibertron 298.15 Fiber Optic Cable 22757 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 880.33 Lab Supplies 22758 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 20.680.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure 22759 Fountain Valley Camera 51 A7 Photo Supplies 22760 Future Electronics 55.76 Electrical Supplies 22761 Ganahl Lumber Company 2.272.51 Lumber/Hardware 22762 Garlock Gaskets-Technologies 2000 50.00 Registration Page 4 of 9 - Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/15/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22763 Ganatt-Callahan Company 2,080.11 Chemicals 22764 Garvey Resources,Inc. 1,975.50 Legal Service-Kern County Ordinance 22765 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,425.12 Fiberglass Repair 22766 GTE California 1.949.05 Telephone Services 22767 Genium Publishing Corp. 20.85 Publication 22768 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 7.282.39 Belt,Filter Press Supplies 22769 Government Finance Officers Association 55.00 Subscnpfion 22770 WW Grainger,Inc. 4.552.11 Compressor Supplies 22771 Graphic Distributors 678.83 Photographic Supplies 22772 Graseby S.T.I. 7,479.10 Engine Supplies 22773 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2.436.72 Fiberglass Grating 22774 Graybar Electric Company 2,496.89 Electrical Supplies 22775 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 64.00 Janitorial Supplies 22776 GST, Inc./Micro City 23.06 Office Supplies 22777 Haaker Equipment Company 1.772.73 Truck Supplies 22778 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 15,476.82 Truk Supplies 22779 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 37AD Catering Services 22780 Hilti, Inc. 352.73 Tools 22781 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 668.55 Compressor Parts 22782 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 8,788.95 Engineering Services 2<7 22783 Home Depot 189.36 Small Hardware 22784 Hopkins Technical Products 721.80 Pump Supplies 22785 Horizon Technology 2.004.88 Lab Supplies 22786 Hub Auto Supply 593.39 Truck Parts 22787 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 1,140.35 Pump Supplies 22788 Imaging Plus,Inc. 7.25 Office Supplies 22789 Independent Rigging 120.00 Lab Supplies 22790 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental 22791 Stateflet 200.00 Online Service 22792 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 278.00 Lab Supplies 22793 Internet Corporation 327.45 Computer Supplies 22794 Interstate Battery Systems 459.02 Batteries 22795 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.99 Photographic Services 22796 IBM Corporation 1,475.55 IBM ASI400 Upgrade 22797 J&B Auto Parts 222.57 Auto Parts&Supplies 22795 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 4,009.80 Instrument Supplies 22799 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 510.00 Training Registration 22800 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 5,954.50 Misc.Construction Services 22801 Jay's Catering 160.65 Catering Services 22802 Johnstone Supply 329.87 Electrical Supplies 22803 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 13,125.00 Engineering Services 2-41 Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22804 KP. Lindstrom, Inc. 6,016.95 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 22805 Kelly Paper 55.92 Paper 22806 Industrial Distribution Group 1,509.29 Tools 22807 Kris Kaligian 275.00 Contractual Services-Writing 22808 Lab Support 9,920.38 Temporary Employment Services 22809 LaserAll Corp. 724.10 Printer Service Agreement 22810 La Motte Chemical Products 575.46 Sulfide Test Kit 22811 Lexis-Nexis 343.75 Books&Publications 22812 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.88 Welding Supplies 22813 MarVac Electronics 141.79 Instrument Supplies 22814 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1.520.58 Plumbing Supplies 22815 Mellon Trust 15,405.83 Investment Custodian Bank 22816 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.373.00 Mechanical Repairs 22817 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 6,572.62 Tools&Supplies 22818 Mission Uniform Service 3.380.33 Uniform Rentals 22819 Mitchell Instrument Co. 167.00 Instruments 22820 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 8,964.37 Engineering Service 5411-1 22821 Moreland&Associates 5,564.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 22822 Morton Salt 788.80 Salt 22823 MoloPhoto 69.57 Photographic Services 22824 Museum Shops 91.68 Publication 22825 MS Abrasive Cleaning Equipment,Inc. 226.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 22826 Nat West Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 22827 National Plant Services, Inc. 11,587.50 Vacuum Truck Services 22828 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 6,035.00 Training Registration 22829 Neal Supply Co. 151.60 Plumbing Supplies 22830 Network Generations,Inc. 19.890.65 Computer Supplies 22831 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1.192.00 Training Registration-Computer 22832 Newark Electronics 651.72 Instrument Supplies 22833 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,592.44 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 22834 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 17.498.80 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 22835 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,427.46 Office Supplies 22836 Orange County Vector Control District 215.08 Pest Control 22837 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 515.25 Electrical Supplies 22838 Orange Courier 87.30 Courier Services 22839 Oxygen Service Company 1,203.89 Specialty Gases 22840 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 81.46 Electrical Supplies 22841 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 22842 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4.069.50 Plumbing Supplies 22843 Pacific Southwest Group 6,503.48 Professional Service-Beach Closure 228" Pagenet 1,547.19 Rental Equipment Page 6 of 9 - < t Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22845 Parts Unlimited 771.34 Truck Supplies 22846 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 304.40 Filters 22847 Pinkerton Systems Integration 13,360.82 Security Card Reader System 22848 Pitney Bowes 353.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 22849 Cambridge Integrated Service 2.083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 22850 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 7,007.84 Temporary Employment Services 22851 Projects Partners 16,488.00 Temporary Employment Services 22852 PCS Express 20.00 Courier Service 22853 PFT/Alexander Service, Inc. 381.35 Instrument Supplies 22854 PRIMA-Public Risk Management Assoc. 255.00 Membership 22855 Quickstart Technologies 1,700.00 Training Registration 22856 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 199.08 Instrument Supplies 22867 Restek Corp 2,820.79 Lab Supplies 22858 Right Click Software 59.95 Publication 22859 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 8.005.56 Pump Supplies 22860 RPM Electric Motors 1.127.74 Electric Motor Repair 22861 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 457.69 Paint Supplies 22862 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 268.00 Mechanical Supplies 22863 Schwing America, Inc. 4,787.21 Pump Supplies 22864 City of Seal Beach 297.14 Water Use 22885 Second-Sun 30.56 Light Fixtures 22866 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,374.47 Tools/Hardware 22867 Sierra Automated Valve Services, Inc. 808.00 Electrical Maint. 22868 Sigma Chemical Co. 1,652.02 Lab Supplies 22869 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,510.37 Natural Gas 22870 SollChoice 1,014.67 Software 22871 Sonic Systems, Inc. 1,629.75 Computer Supplies 22872 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,241.60 Emission Fees 22873 Spectrum Geophysics 9,720.00 Professional Service-Ground Radar Study 22874 Standard&P000s 2,500.00 Analytical Services 22875 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 1,297.38 Pump Supplies 22876 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service 22877 State Board of Equalization 766.47 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 22878 Sterling Art 174.12 Art Supplies 22879 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals 22880 Summit Steel 228.22 Metal 22881 Sunset Ford 74.78 Truck Supplies 22882 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 22883 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 445.11 Electric Cart Parts 22884 The Memwood Corporation 7,416.82 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 22885 The Orange County Register 1,530.90 Notices 8 Ads Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22886 Finnigan-A ThennoGuest Subsidiary 76.67 Lab Supplies 22887 Thomas Bros. Maps 1,198.15 Printing 22888 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 150.97 Mechanical Supplies 22889 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 22890 Tom Dickey 317.00 Travel Expense Reimb. 22891 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 355.65 Locks&Keys 22892 Toshiba International Corporation 2,328.89 Electrical Supplies 22893 Traffic Control Service,Inc. 14.55 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 22894 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 336.00 Lab Services 22895 TCH Associates,Inc. 4,139.55 Lab Supplies 22896 Teksystems 5,875.00 Temporary Employment Services 22897 United Parcel Service 31.31 Parcel Services 22898 V&A Consulting Engineers 6,373.51 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 22899 Valcom 57.88 Software 22900 Valley Cities Supply Company 625.62 Plumbing Supplies 22901 Valley Splicing Co. 500.00 Equipment Repair 22902 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 23.726.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management 22903 Varian Chromatography Systems 2.363.93 Equipment Maint. 22904 Verne's Plumbing 12,040.00 Plumbing Supplies 22905 Village Nurseries 53.47 Landscaping Supplies 22906 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 17,922.85 Lab Supplies 22907 The Wackenhut Corporation 15.264.26 Security Guards 22908 Waters Corporation 1.354.84 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment 22909 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 64.77 Electrical Supplies 22910 Western States Chemical, Inc. 22.120.20 Caustic Soda MO B-23-95 22911 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 7,375.06 Instrument Supplies 22912 Worldview Travel 376.00 Travel Service 22913 Xerox Corporation 8,243.52 Copier Leases 22914 Advanoo Constructors, Inc. 16,361.00 Construction 641-1 22915 Advanoo Constructors,Inc. 16,498.00 Construction 541-1 22916 CNA Trust 3.540.00 Construction 541-1 22917 First Fire Systems, Inc. 174.20 Construction Contract J-57 22918 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 12,028.00 Construction 7-28 22919 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 1,975.59 Engineering Services 240 22920 Gary L.Aguirre 164.34 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimb. 22921 Stephen J.Surrill 314.86 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb. 22922 Deon M.Carrico 248.12 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb. 22923 Arnold G.Chavez 30.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22924 James E.Colston 317.94 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb. 22925 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr. 261.80 Meetingri mining Expense Reimb. 22926 Darrell S. Ennis 208.34 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimb. Page 8 of �' - Claims Paid From 10/1/99 to 10115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22927 Timothy D.Foley 243.46 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22928 Tom E. Gaworski 211.23 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 22929 John G. Gonzalez 222.76 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 22930 Ingrid G. Hellebmnd 502.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22931 Roy Perrino 182.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22932 Brian K.Reed 340.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22933 Michael Reideler 257.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22934 George L. Robertson 804.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22935 Mary S.Thompson 247.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22936 Jane H.Tran 201.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22937 Joseph F.Vallone 211.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22938 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,935.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 22939 Orange County Sanitation District 1,164.28 Petry Cash Reimb. 22940 James L.Wybenga 204.35 Meeling/Traming Expense Reimb. 22941 IBM Corp. 8.075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 22942 Pinnacle One 17.375.00 Legal Service 11-17-1 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.288.367.54 Payroll Disbursements 15817-15941 Employee Paychecks $ 164.833.31 Biweekly Payroll 10/6199 15942-15943 Employee Paychecks 16,377.04 Termination&Adjustment 42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 687.979.21 Biweekly Payroll 1016/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 849.189.56 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,689.01 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 204.256.17 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank 8 Trust Co. of Ca. 174,780.58 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 528.725.76 Total Claims Paid 1011/99-10/15/99 $ 5,668,282.86 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 10116/99 to 10/31/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 22943 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. $ 36,157.02 Consulting Services-FIS Support 22944 Orange County Sanitation District 425,933.06 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 22945 Southern California Edison 48,150.52 Power 22946 Allied Management Resources, Inc. 750.00 Legal Service-Burge Claim 22947 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 144.60 Mechanical Supplies 22948 American Express 4,659.16 Purchasing Card Program 22949 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.28 Telephone Service 22950 Bell Pipe& Supply Co. 450.14 Valve Supplies 22951 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 22952 Cad Warren&Co. 1,023.02 Insurance Claims Administrator 22953 Chinh Do 1,203.77 Vehicle Damage Claim 22954 Court Order 581.00 Wage Gamishment 22955 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 336.87 Plumbing Supplies 22956 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 22957 Court Order 766.50 Wage Garnishment 22958 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 8,465.17 Plumbing Supplies 22959 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 22960 GTE California 5,262.55 Telephone Services 22961 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,116.18 Dues Deduction 22962 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use 22963 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 207.84 Safety Supplies 22964 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 6,932.00 Misc.Construction Services 22965 Maintenance Technology Corp. 940.23 Welding Supplies 22966 MarVac Electronics 201.45 Instrument Supplies 22967 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 38.25 Tools 22968 Mission Uniform Service 128.96 Uniform Rentals 22969 Motion Industries 53.09 Pump Supplies 22970 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 22971 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 22972 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 547.14 Electrical Supplies 22973 OCFA 629.14 Dues Deduction 22974 Pacific Bell 62.69 Telephone Services 22975 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 22976 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 22977 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction 22978 Scott, Reilly&Whitehead 46.25 Legal Services-Human Resources Issues 22979 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 53.93 Tools 22980 Sharp Claim Services 85.00 Appraisal Service 22981 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 61.92 Tools/Hardware Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid From 10/16199 to 1O131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 22982 Snap On Industdal 3,139.65 Hardware 22983 So.Cal.Gas Company 13,403.57 Natural Gas 22984 State of California 133.35 Wage Garnishment 22985 StudioVisia 19,360.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint. 22986 Summit Steel 270.9E Metal 22987 Tomell&Cotten 854.80 Legal Service-Burge Claim 22988 The Unisource Corporation 7,024.60 Office Supplies 22989 United Way 307.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22990 Gerardo Amezcua 372.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22991 Blake Anderson 531.89 Meetingriraining Expense Reimb. 22992 Catherine M. Biele 307.08 Meetingrlraining Expense Reimb. 22993 David P.Halverson 1.005.18 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 22994 Thomas A.Hunt 334.54 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 22995 William F.Webster,Jr. 997.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 22996 Aerochem, Inc. 1,941.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 22997 Air Industries Corporation 7,784.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 229M Voided Check - - 22999 Anaheim General Hospital 993.39 Rewnclllation User Fee Refund 23000 Burlington Engineering, Inc. 971.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23001 Chapman Hospital 154.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23002 Chrome Technology, Inc. 435.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23003 Huntington Beach Medical Center 1,504.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23004 Continuous Coating 1,904.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23005 Coming OCA Corp. 1,076.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23006 Disc Manufacturing, Inc. 911.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23007 Electrorack Products Co., Inc. 857.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23008 Fullerton Foods/Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. 1.471.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23009 La Habra Plating 174.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23010 La Palma Intercommunity,Hospital 995.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23011 Laundedand 53.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23012 M.S. Bellows 213.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23013 Miuometals, Inc.#2 1,235.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23014 Monarch Precision Debuning Co. 1.144.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23015 Orange Container 2,933.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23016 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 3.865.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23017 Pentadyne/PentaBex, Inc. 537.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23018 Pilkington Aerospace 20,400.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23019 Pure Chem Products Co. 158.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23020 Rainbow Disposal Co, Inc. 646.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23021 Ricoh Electronics#2 2,614.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23022 RBC Transport Dynamics 169.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23023 South Bay Chrome Sales 583.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23024 St Jude Medical Center 8,512.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23025 Sunclipse, Inc. 5,017.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23026 T&P Plating Corporation 152.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23027 Taormina Industries, Inc.#4 685.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23028 United Custom Polishing&Plating 637.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23029 Universal Circuits,Inc. 1,871.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23030 Val Circuits#5 165.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23031 Y K K(USA), Inc. 1,628.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23032 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,190.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 23033 Orange County Sanitation District 18,394.78 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 23034 Robert C.Thompson 1,185.71 MeetingrTraining Expense Relmb. 23035 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 33,365.00 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 23036 Blue Cross of California 176,053.12 Medical Insurance Premium 23037 Boyle Engineering Corporation 38,682.56 Engineering Services Pl41 &7-27 23038 Bristol Systems, Inc. 30,060.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 23039 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 90,418.46 26 Computers,5 Printers,4 Monitors& 1 Server 23040 Delta Dental 41,647.47 Dental Insurance Plan 23041 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 103,601.05 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 23042 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,858.10 Medical Insurance Premium 23043 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 108,310.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 230" Orange County Water District 58,103.94 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 23045 OCB Reprographics 27,660.43 Printing Service-Spec P-173 23046 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 29,204.45 Electrical Supplies 23047 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 133,843.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 23048 Polydyne, Inc. 30,982.50 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11.92 23049 Realtime Systems Corporation 79,070.00 Software Maint. Service 23050 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 220,274.70 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 23051 SPEC Services, Inc. 127,848.62 Engineering Services J-33.1 23052 Tran Consulting Engineers 60,000.00 Consulting Services-Misc. Small Capital Projects 23053 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 33,458.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 23054 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 61,565.33 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 23055 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 73,899.28 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 23056 Ark Construction Company 47,460.98 Construction Pl444 23067 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 73,368.20 Construction P2-65 23050 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 35,845.09 Construction 3.38-3.2-R-97 23059 S.S. Mechanical Corporation 112,443.27 Construction P146-2 23060 Southern Contracting Company 156,708.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1 23061 Academic Press 7.76 Publication Page 3 of 10 �' G ' Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23052 Aearo Company 137.00 Safety Supplies 23063 Air Products&Chemicals 23,458.33 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 23064 Airborne Express 47.50 Air Freight 23065 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies 23066 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 7.344.24 Manhole Frames&Covers 23067 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 19,162.40 Dispute Analysis&Report [3068 Analysts, Inc. 2,145.84 Testing Kits 23069 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 23070 Appleone Employment Service 15,130.88 Temporary Employment Services 23071 Applied Industrial Technology 1,451.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 23072 Arcus Data Security 106.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 23073 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,040.00 Vacuum Truck Services 23074 Art's Disposal Service, Inc. 588.36 Waste Removal 23075 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement 23076 Awards&Trophies By Bea 197.94 Plaques 23077 American Air Filter International 1.386.62 Filter 23078 AMP Incorporated 2,085.00 Registration 23079 AMSA 335.00 Registration 23080 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 372.65 Telephone Service 23081 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 10.75 Telephone Service 23082 Battery Specialties 991.21 Batteries 23083 Bauer Compressors 2e1.74 Safety Supplies 23084 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 648.10 Office Supplies 23085 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 58.99 Publication 23086 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,128.00 Surveying Services MO a-25-97 23087 Cal-Glass,Inc. 134.69 Lab Equipment Service 23088 California Automatic Gate 270.56 Service Agreement 23089 Calpelra 890.00 Registration 23090 CalCoast-City of Huntington Beach 1.000.00 Coastal Symposium Membership 23091 Career Track 387.00 Registration 23092 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 17.75 Courier Service 23093 Century Paint 207.74 Paint Supplies 23094 Charles P.Crowley Co. 704.73 Instrument Parts 23095 Cheyenne Livestock&Products, Inc. 2.875.00 Storage Cabinets 23096 City Office Furniture, Inc. 386.77 Office Supplies 23097 ClarkLift of Los Angeles 3,695.50 Pallet Racks 23098 Clean Air Report 1,865.00 Subscription 23099 Commercial Door Company, Inc. 3.378.00 Roof Hatch 23100 Connell GM Parts 520.05 Truck Supplies Pnne 4 of in Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23101 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 5,093.48 Electrical Supplies 23102 Consolidated Plastics Company 122.22 Lab Supplies 23103 Continental Network Services 8,033.42 Service Contract-Electrical Repair 23104 Converse Consultants 5,227.18 Consulting Services-Huntington State Beach Investigation 23105 Cooper Energy Services 2,010.02 Engine Supplies 23106 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 23107 Corporate Express 1,77023 Office Supplies 23108 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 23109 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 5.749.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 23110 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 19,888.99 SARI Line Protection Reimb. 23111 County of Orange 70.00 Permit Fees 23112 County Wholesale Electric Co. 182.16 Electrical Supplies 23113 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 300.00 Conference Registration 23114 CR 8 R. Inc. 3,192.00 Container Rentals 23115 CWEA Membership 205.00 Membership 23116 David's Tree Service 14,710.00 Tree Maint. Service 23117 Del Mar Analytical 536.00 Biosolids Analysis 23118 Drexelbrook cto Patten Corporation 4.161.76 Instrument Supplies 23119 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 19.61 Paint Supplies 23120 DMG-Maximus 15,170.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit 23121 JWC Environmental 5,860.66 Mechanical Maint. Service 23122 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 157.00 Medical Screening 23123 Eldridge Products 1.444.73 Instrument Maint. Service 23124 Elsevier Science 882.00 Publication 23125 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 23126 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies 23127 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 3,871.02 Software License 23128 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,153.67 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 23129 Environmental Professionals Organization 39.00 Registration 23130 Faxpress, Inc. 1,431.24 Office Supplies 23131 FedEx Corporation 429.56 Air Freight 23132 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 359.57 Plumbing Supplies 23133 Fibertron 1,841.97 Fiber Optic Cable 23134 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription 23135 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,200.75 Lab Supplies 23136 Flo-Systems, Inc. 10,880.28 Pump Supplies 23137 Foothill Engineering 8 Dewatering, Inc. 20.240.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure 23138 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,071.56 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium 23139 Fountain Valley Camera 75.34 Photo Supplies 23140 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 455.50 Truck Wash Tickets Page 5 of 10 4 , Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23141 Fox Bay Industries 91.70 Office Supplies 23142 Fry's Electronics 990.41 Computer Supplies 23143 Ganahl Lumber Company 16.86 Lumber/Hardware 23W Garra9-Callahan Company 5,379.96 Chemicals 23145 GTE California 610.15 Telephone Services 23146 Gednge Castle 487.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 23147 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,644.74 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 23148 WW Grainger,Inc. 194.98 Compressor Supplies 23149 Graphic Distributors 270.50 Photographic Supplies 23150 Graseby S.T.I. 820.75 Engine Supplies 23151 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 637.23 Janitorial Supplies 23152 Haaker Equipment Company 3,555.97 Truck Supplies 23153 Hach Company 158.77 Lab Supplies 23154 Harcourt Brace 8 Co.and Subsidiaries 68.60 Publication 23155 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 23156 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 72.62 Plumbing Supplies 23157 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8.Deli 114.30 Catering Services 23158 Hlld, Inc. 550.31 Tools 23159 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 3,448.17 Compressor Parts 23160 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium 23161 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 18.379.66 Engineering Services 241 23162 Home Depot 710.19 Small Hardware 23163 Hopkins Technical Products 87.12 Pump Supplies 23164 Hub Auto Supply 32.08 Truck Parts 23165 City of Huntington Beach 12,503.19 Water Use 23166 Imaging Plus,Inc. 116.50 Office Supplies 23167 Impulse 382.88 Lab Supplies 23168 Intennec Corporation 10,111.07 Computer Supplies 23169 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.71 Photographic Services 23170 Irvine Ranch Water District 23.28 Water Use 23171 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 18,402.76 Safety Supplies 23172 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 31.45 Training Expenses 23173 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 21,913.97 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 23174 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 10,398.00 Misc.Construction Services 23175 Jay's Catering 796.53 Catering Services 23176 Johnstone Supply 2,130.84 Electrical Supplies 23177 Jordan Controls 320.62 Annual Membership Renewal 23178 Kelly Paper 281.19 Paper 23179 Industrial Distribution Group 4,326.24 Tools 23180 Lab Support 11,107.02 Temporary Employment Services Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23181 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 260.63 Galvanize Beams 23182 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2.519.21 Mechanical Supplies 23183 Maintenance Technology Corp. 339.07 Welding Supplies 23184 MarVac Electronics 97.06 Instrument Supplies 23186 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 702.10 Tools 23186 Mm Analytical System 2,075.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 23187 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 2,000.00 Software Maint.Agreement 23188 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,673.45 Mechanical Repairs 23189 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 439.01 Tools&Supplies 23190 Mission Uniform Service 3.317.72 Uniform Rentals 23191 Mitchell instrument Co. 1,426-00 Instruments 23192 MotoPhoto 73.92 Photographic Services 23193 National Audio-Visual Supply 79.87 Office Supplies 23194 National Institute of Stds&Technology 735.00 Lab Supplies 23195 National Microcomp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 23196 National Plant Services, Inc 1,587.50 Vacuum Truck Services 23197 Neal Supply Co. 20.20 Plumbing Supplies 23198 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 8,344.00 Training Registration-Computer 23199 City of Newport Beach 109.48 Water Use 23200 Nicholas Chevrolet 13.95 Truck Repairs 23201 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 7.054.40 LubricanVDiesel Fuel 23202 The Norco Companies 282.40 Mail Delivery Service 23203 NAS Associates, Inc. 1,493.25 Lab Services 23204 NovaTech Lighting Systems 1.159.80 Electrical Supplies 23205 Netsol 860.80 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 23206 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,592.22 Office Supplies 23207 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 64.41 Plumbing Supplies 23208 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.66 Electrical Supplies 23209 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Service Agreement 23210 Oxygen Service Company 2,050.86 Specialty Gases 23211 Pacific Bell 1.078.46 Telephone Services 23212 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5.933.18 Plumbing Supplies 23213 Parts Unlimited 52.06 Truck Supplies 23214 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 5,252.17 Filters 23215 Port Supply 37.71 Rope 23216 Powerware 170.41 Publication 23217 Cambndge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin. 23218 Primary Source 25025 Office Furniture 23219 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 6,607.28 Temporary Employment Services 23220 Professional Procurement Seminars 4,770.00 Training Registration Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid From 10/116/99 to 10131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23221 Projects Partners 17,846.67 Temporary Employment Services 23222 DOS, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 23223 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 23224 R.T.Corporation 256.00 Lab Supplies 23225 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 23226 Ramco Specialty Products 823.79 Chemical 23227 Red Wing Shoes 118.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 23228 Reliastar 7.760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 23229 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,567.36 Life Insurance Premium 23230 Rosen Electrical 2,265.12 Electrical Supplies 23231 Roto Rooter-S.O.C.#51 1.354.66 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. State Beach Sewer Lines 23232 Royce Instrument Corporation 5,029.08 Instrument Supplies 23233 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,875.00 Engineering Services-Crane Safety 23234 RSA Sutter Soil Products 612.83 Soil Materials 23235 Safety-Kleen 561.29 Service Agreement 23236 Santa Ana Electric Motors 674.52 Motor Repair 23237 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 325.03 Mechanical Supplies 23238 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 725.39 Specialty Gases 23239 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 563.60 Lab Repairs 23240 Sears Industrial Sales 922.46 Mechanical Supplies 23241 Second-Sun 193.37 Light Fixtures 23242 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 343.36 Tools/Hardware 23243 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 23244 Sievers Instruments 1.491.55 Lab Supplies 23245 Supelco, Inc. 440.00 Lab Supplies 23246 So. Cal.Gas Company 602.97 Natural Gas 23247 SoftView Computer Products 208.50 Computer Supplies 23248 Southern California Edison Company 160.00 Publication 23249 Southwest Scientific Inc. 1.535.06 Instrument Supplies 23250 Sparkletts 2.016.72 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 23251 Specialty Technical Publishers, Inc. 280.75 Publication 23252 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 332.30 Lab Supplies 23253 State Water Resources Control Board 10.000.00 Annual NPDES Permit Fee 23254 Summit Steel 176.40 Metal 23255 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 23256 Sunset Industrial Parts 838.79 Mechanical Supplies 23257 Solar Turbines, Inc. 1,288.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 23258 SWRCB Accounting Office 400.00 Annual Fee 23259 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 82.21 Electric Cart Parts 23260 Teamwork!Corporate Programs 122.27 Tools Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid From 10116M to 10/31/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23261 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 64.13 Publication 23262 Tekmar-Dohrman 1.733.59 Lab Supplies 23263 Thermo Optek Corporation 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Service Agreement 23264 Thomas Bros.Maps 390.49 Printing 23265 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.573.62 Mechanical Supplies 23266 Thyssen Dover Elevator 1,439.10 Elevator Maintenance 23267 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 94.00 Locks 8 Keys 23268 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 456.99 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 23269 The Trans Company 2.830.00 Electrical Equipment Maint. Service 23270 Transcat 5,401.01 Electrical Supplies 23271 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 10,277.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 23272 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 150.80 Truck Supplies 23273 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 80.00 Lab Services 23274 Two Wheels One Planet 286.43 Bicycle Supplies 23275 TDI-Brooks International 4,550.00 Lab Supplies 23276 Teksystems 7,362.50 Temporary Employment Services 23277 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 2,455.00 Equipment Certification 23278 Ultra Scientific 341.66 Lab Supplies 23279 United Parcel Service 715.16 Parcel Services 23280 Unocal 76 65.16 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1 23281 Valley Cities Supply Company 602.62 Plumbing Supplies 232a2 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 22,267.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management 23283 Veme's Plumbing 200.00 Plumbing Supplies 23264 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.373.18 Vision Service Premium 23285 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,420.71 Lab Supplies 23286 Waxie Sanitary Supply 826.80 Janitorial Supplies 23287 Western States Chemical, Inc. 8,573.18 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 23288 Xerox Corporation 11,529.00 Copier Leases 23289 Systems Integrated 10,291.88 Construction Services J-31-3 23290 Jeffrey Brown 975.98 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 23291 Pongsakdi Cady 786.06 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimb. 23292 Vladimir A. Kogan 978.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23293 Roland T. McReynolds 166.82 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 23294 Michael D. Moore 1,931.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23285 Adrian Renescu 1,236.57 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23296 Mahin Talebi 742.58 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb. 23297 Edward M.Tortes 1.162.89 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23298 Charles F.Wnsor 922.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23299 Moyasar T.Yahya 907.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 23300 Paula A.Zeller 456.13 Meeling/Training Expense Reimb. Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10/31/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 23301 Alum-A-Therm 1,186.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 23302 Orange County Sanitation District 903.54 Petty Cash Reimb. 23303 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership 23304 County of Orange 850.00 Permit Fee 23305 County of Orange 38.00 Permit Fee Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,416,262.43 Payroll Disbursements 15944. 16091 Employee Paychecks $ 174,043.45 Biweekly Payroll 10120/99 16092-16092 Employee Paycheck 98.55 Adjustment 42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 673,061.99 Biweekly Payroll 10120199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 847,203.99 Total Claims Paid 10/16199-10131199 $ 4,263,466.42 Page 10 of 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS M°MingDa,° TRBE.orD,. nmres AGENDA REPORT "°"'"°'^"°' 1inNoin°°' om Orange County Sandalion Oisincl FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: DENIAL OF CLAIM OF MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and deny claim of Mladen Buntich Construction Company dated October 11, 1999, in the amount of$1,157,188.00 for alleged damages in connection with Improvements to Miller- Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3. SUMMARY The subject claim was received by the District on October 14, 1999, and is related to the construction of the Miller-Holder Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3. District staff has been meeting with Mladen Buntich over the course of several months in an attempt to resolve the matter. Please refer to the attached November 1, 1999, memo from General Counsel. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from General Counsel dated November 1, 1999 SK:Ic 'Rtlntl,.n 0•Y�`BYO Rry 11 I.14.1. R.. Page 7 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, October 27, 1999 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, October 27, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Pal McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Jim Silva, County Supervisor Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources John Collins, Past Chair of the Board Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Directors Absent: Mike Moore, ECM Manager None Layne Baroldi, Environmental Regulatory Specialist OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Tom Nixon, Counsel Don Hughes Ryal Wheeler Fred Cardenas Dave Schlesinger Augie Caires Dan McMillan Jan Goldby Jim Howell Ed winamer Doug Isbell John Lippitt (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 October 27, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the September 22, 1999 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Debay welcomed the members of the San Diego Wastewater Management District Advisory Committee, who spent the day with staff and Directors Eckenrode and Swan to discuss our administrative and management policies. Several Directors attended the October 20 Peter Sandman seminar on public outrage, and Director Swan recommended that Mr. Sandman return to address the League of Cities as well as employees of IRWD and other agencies. He indicated that IRWD would help pay the costs. Chair Debay also mentioned that there has been some talk about sewering dry weather flow from the new development planned near Crystal Cove. So far no one has contacted the District. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. The General Manager reported that the November 3 OMTS Committee meeting has been cancelled. And because of a conflict with a League of Cities meeting on November 4, the PDC Committee will meet at 5 p.m. at Edison Field. Next month's Steering Committee agenda will have several major policy issues to discuss, including succession planning and rate consolidation. Several changes in executive management personnel (Mike Peterman's early departure in December rather than January, and Ed Hodges' departure on November 1) make a discussion of the structure of the organization essential as well. Director Silva said that he has had several meetings regarding the problems in Huntington Beach and that the General Manager was in attendance representing the Sanitation District. Director Silva thanked Mr. McIntyre for his positive approach in working with the cities and agencies on this difficult issue. B. Report of the Assistant Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported on the Huntington Beach Closure and Urban Flow Diversion activities. Staff is completing a long list of items and preparing the final report for presentation to the Directors in November. The county and cities have formed a group to look at upstream sources. The Huntington Beach special discharge permit is on tonight's Board agenda. Researchers from UCI are investigating the channel and marshes. NWRI has provided a matching grant of $75,000 for these studies. A panel of experts is being formed to evaluation the event and provide recommendations should it occur again. The outfall dye test was completed and there were no leaks. Questions have arisen, however, on background levels of the ocean and additional studies may be recommended. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 October 27, 1999 Dave Schlesinger indicated that San Diego has also experienced some beach closures as a result of urban water runoff. The work done around Mission Bay, however, has eliminated the problem in that area. Director Silva said that he represents nine cities on the Board of Supervisors and they have all discussed the major impacts of beach closures. They are developing an MOU for funding studies and will be looking for help from other cities. The Regional Board has sent letters to the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Seal Beach and Costa Mesa putting them on notice of the possibility for violations if storm drain discharges are determined to be the source of contamination. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D) A. Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority Conflicting Committee Actions Staff requested direction from the Steering Committee on how to proceed in the event two of the working committees made differing/conflicting recommendations on the same issue. The Steering Committee members agreed that both recommendations should be presented to the Board in an agenda report and the Board members would decide which recommendation to implement. B. Land Purchase/Lease in Central Valley—Due Diligence Update Bob Ghirelli and Layne Baroldi updated the members on the due diligence activities since the last Steering Committee meeting. A list of deal points has been developed. A formal recommendation will be presented to the Board at the November meeting. It was decided that the OMTS Committee would meet jointly with the FAHR Committee on Wednesday, November 10, to review the issues in detail before presenting to the Board. C. Membership of FAHR subcommittee re Refunds for Yorba Linda Properties Served by Septic Tanks The FAHR Committee recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee to consider refunds for property owners currently on septic systems. However, the members were identified. Chair Debay appointed Tom Saltarelli as chair of the committee, Peer Swan and Lynn Daucher as members of this Ad Hoc Committee. Staff and legal counsel will prepare a report outlining options to present to the Committee. General Counsel Tom Woodruff said that he has had discussions with County legal staff on this matter and concern was expressed about the four-year statute of limitations. Additional legal research is ongoing in order to determine whether Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 October27, 1999 D. The Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in November were not reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 4 p.m. This meeting will begin one hour earlier to allow additional time for a 6 p.m. closed session discussion with General Counsel and the full Board on the claim of litigation re Crow-Winthrop [pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)]. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for November 17, 1999 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:16 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Items Nos. 13A(1), 12A(2), 13A(3) and 13A(4). The Committee did not consider Agenda Item No. 13A(5), and no report was given. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 October 27, 1999 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:56 p.m. Smitted by:b : J Tappan ring Committee Secretary NYI.MWMMKSIEFMI.E COYY/rIEEIVThH11f0}NO3L YYMMt6i w DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, November 4, 1999, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, November 4, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the Second Floor Conference Room at Edison Field, Anaheim, California. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Past Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Jack Mauller Malt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Russell Patterson Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Christina Shea Jan Debay, Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Shawn Boyd, Director Directors Absent: John Cavanaugh, Woodruff, Spradlin &Smart Dave Olson, Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart None (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 7, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. PDC Committee Minutes a Page 2 November 4, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode asked that staff prepare a report for a future PDC Committee meeting regarding urban runoff and how to get other agencies involved. Director Boyd reported that he has received a letter asking the same questions on the same issue, and he will be responding and will give the Board a comprehensive view of the status. General Manager Don McIntyre reported that at the last City Managers meeting a committee has been formed (he is a member of the committee) to address this issue because four Orange County cities have received letters from the Regional Board, putting them on notice re urban runoff. The County will be obligated to do more to monitor the quality of the water being discharged into the storm drain system. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager McIntyre did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin did not make a report. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. PDC 99-51 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost&Associates for the Main Entrance Traffic and Roadway Configuration Study at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19980029, for an amount not to exceed $49,806. Directors expressed concern about the numerous changes to the main entrance in the past few years. MOTION: Staff was directed to prepare a conceptual layout for the Committee's review in December. 1 y PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 November 4, 1999 b. PDC 99-52 (1)Approve plans and specifications for Demolition of Warehouse and Area Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP199990065; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to West- Tech Contracting for Demolition of Warehouse and Area Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. PS19990065, for an amount not to exceed $49,200. MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve. c. PDC 99-53 Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500. MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. d. PDC 99.54 Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $57,764, for a total amount not to exceed $684,054. MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 5:12 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Items Nos. 12.1.a. At 5:35 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. e PDC Committee Minutes d Page 4 l November 4, 1999 (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 1999, at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. Submitted by: / J a appan D Committee Secretary N:Wp.dtaNpendaWDCTDC99%9MINS1110499 ndmdas.doc PDC COMMITTEE raeennglr TO'Ed 11/9/99 33/I]/99 AGENDA REPORT Item NumM Item Number iDL99-53 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF MILLER HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SIPHON, CONTRACT NO. 3-2-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500. SUMMARY The Miller Holder Trunk Sewer line and siphon was built in 1961. The sewer consists of a 69-inch pipe with a triple 30-inch barrel siphon under the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel. The County of Orange owns the right-of-way and prior rights for this flood control channel. The County of Orange has completed plans to widen and deepen the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel. This construction project requires that Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) relocate their existing sewer siphon and structures to avoid any interference with the construction of the new flood control channel-widening project. The County of Orange will add OCSD construction plans to their bid package. The County of Orange will administer both sets of plans in one construction contract. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The total budget for siphon replacement is estimated at$ 1,997,500. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Revenue Area 3 has sufficient reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCSD will hire a Consultant to pat hole, perform field survey work and design a new siphon to replace and lower the existing siphon underneath the new flood control channel. rypanNvmlMy.UhV�Ma`8 Ebwda ReNh\1BW Batl�peMa Rep6\11WM1en 1]�c)M R..,,,.. vmse Page 1 It is anticipated that the design can be achieved as a task under the General Managers ` small project design authority not to exceed $50,000.00. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives for this sewer work. The District has the option of providing no coordination between OCSD and the County of Orange for the proposed project. By coordinating the OCSD project together with the County of Orange project, there would be less inconvenience to the public and the combined cost of both projects should be less. CEQA FINDINGS The County of Orange is handling the CEQA documentation for both projects. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table RLC:jak G:WglobaMgenda Draft ReporlslPDCl 24 AR 11 U99.Eot 1YaJanVvylWp.ChgpsMa MIp R*p UMB-M I9..R.p 111E talc)O% R. ermse Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF MILLER HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SIPHON CONTRACT NO. 3-2-1 ORIGINAL`- CURRENT- .PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK`�� .AUTHORIZED PROJECT,- ".BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET" BUDGET-,' ",INCREASE 'BUDGET ` TO DATE ' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE 70 DA7E(%) Project Development $ 2000 $ 2,000 $ 2.000 0% Desi n Staff $ 65,000 $ 65.000 $ 65,000 0% Ccnsultant PSA $ 49.500 $ 49.500 $ 49.500 0% Construction Contract $ 1,230 000 $ Construction Other $ 10.000 $ Construction Staff $ 84,500 _ $ Reimbursement of 5% for administration costs $ 187.500 Contingency $ 369,000 $ 0% TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 1.997,500 $ - $ 116,500 $ 116,500 $ 0% H1wa.dlalenBUOB5 a MNTMCTS 2-1412-1 Butleat Tablexis]Mcincts PDC COMMITTEE Mee ng Date To ad,Of Dir. 11499 I1-17-99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PLIM 13ro) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-39, ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,764, for a total amount not to exceed $684,054. SUMMARY Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, recommended that a ballast survey program be implemented to monitor the condition of the ballast. The ballast is the protective blanket of rock that absorbs the force of large storm waves. The ballast protecting the 120-inch outfall was placed during construction in the early 1970s. It was recommended that the ballast be monitored every five years and, as needed, following events impacting the ballast, such as severe storms or earthquakes. Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, also recommended proceeding with physical wave tank modeling tests. Racal Pelagos, Inc., inspected and measured the ballast rock in 1996. Several large storms occurred during the El Nino winter of 1997-98; therefore, in December 1998, Racal Pelagos repeated the survey. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast appears to have moved from its original position. Carollo Engineers' project report indicated that a median rock size of 1000 pounds would be needed to protect the near shore zone protective rock cap (Station 27+00 to 50+00). It is also recommended that a median rock size of 700 pounds would be needed on the off shore zone (Station 50+00 to 70+00). These recommendations were based on analytical methods. Physical wave tank testing was conducted at Oregon State University, in July and August 1999 that indicated that the offshore zone protective rock cap (Station 50+00 to 70+00) can be reduced from the initially planned modeling rock a. uses Page 1 size of 700 pounds to a median rock size of 300 pounds. Results of testing conducted in the near shore zone (Station 27+00 to 50+00) are inconclusive due to placement of a false bottom in an effort to recreate actual conditions and potential model scale effects. More detail is provided under the"Additional Information" section of this report. Proposed Addendum No. 6 is to perform additional wave tank testing to determine the required ballast on the near shore zone. The additional testing is needed to determine the extent of additional ballast that will be required and the optimal rock size to provide continued long-term use of the 120-inch outfall. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the original PSA, subsequent addenda, and this pending Addendum No. 6. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: coRF-D1a.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In March 1996, Carollo Engineers entered into an agreement with the District to provide engineering services needed for the investigation and repair work for continued use and reliable performance of the District's 78-inch and 120-inch ocean outfalls, Job. No. J-39. The Scope of Work for the outfall investigation and repair work included: 1. A study and report that analyzes securing the end gate. The study includes preparation of plans and specifications to secure the end gate. 2. Documentation of the amount of solids/grit accumulation in the outfall diffuser and determination of the condition of the outfalls. 3. Preparation of detailed plans and specifications for cleaning of the outfall based on interior inspection. 4. A hydraulic analysis for both outfalls to determine flow capacity. 5. General survey and repair work needed on both outfalls. ate. 1� Page 2 Outfall surveys were conducted by Racal Pelagos, Inc. in 1996 and in 1998 (following the 1997-98 El Nino storms) as part of the J-39 studies to determine the condition of the ballast. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast appears to have moved from its original position. Natural shifting of the ballast pile due to large storm waves during the 1980s and 1990s may have caused this movement. Although some movement was observed, the ballast system did not appear to be in danger of immediate failure. Recent Work Efforts Preliminary results from the analysis conducted in the February 1998 engineering report indicate that almost one mile of the 120-inch outfall would benefit from additional reinforcing ballast. Initial cost estimates to reinforce the outfall from Station 27+00 to 70+00 (the 4300-foot stretch of outfall that experiences the most intensive wave forces) approach $13,000,000. The analysis is considered a theoretical starting point that needs to be verified by physical laboratory testing. In July and August 1999, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech and Dr. Charles Sollitt of Oregon State University(OSU) conducted wave tank testing, at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon in order to test two sections of the 120-inch outfall which are proposed for rerocking. The tests were conducted to determine the degree of stability of proposed armor rock sizes for the two sections of the outfall. A great deal of planning and coordination went into preparing the model tests. In an effort to save costs in the testing program, it was decided to represent the shallow section between Stations 27+00 and 50+00 in the model by taking the original section tested for the deeper section from Station 50+00 to 70+00 and surrounding it with a four foot thick false bottom. This was done rather than rebuilding the model with smaller sized rock, which would have added an estimated five days to the program which would have increased the costs correspondingly. The testing conducted on the deeper section (Station 50+00 to 70+00) indicated that the offshore zone protective rock cap (Station 50+00 to 70+00) can be reduced from the initially planned modeling rock size of 700 pounds to a median rock size of 300 pounds. The results of the testing conducted on the shallow section are inconclusive. This section (Station 27+00 to 50+00) experiences larger forces than the deeper section. Staff expected more rock movement in this section for this reason. However, as the testing proceeded little movement was observed. 1� Page 3 It was concluded that the false bottom resulted in bookends" for the model section which made the model more resistant to wave attack than would be realized in actuality by the 120-inch outfall. Additional Work Effort Recommended—Addendum No. 6 Staff recommends proceeding with additional wave tank testing so the work can be completed by February 2000. The results of the testing conducted in July and August of 1999 have demonstrated a significant savings in costs to rerock the deeper sections (Station 50+00 to 70+00). Staff believes that additional testing conducted on the near shore zone (Station 27+00 to 50+00) will provide additional savings in costs to rerock this section of the ouffall that experiences some of the largest forces due to wave action. Carollo Engineers and their subconsultant, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech, have worked with OSU to establish a program and schedule for additional wave tank testing at their Corvallis, Oregon location test facility. Carollo Engineers proposes to provide the services of Dr. Fred Raichlen again for the planning, coordination, observations, and results evaluation of the wave tank ballast testing at OSU. Carollo Engineers will also provide the services of Dr. Charles Sollitt his staff, and the use of the testing facilities at OSU. Based on the results of the additional wave tank testing, Carollo Engineers will survey existing local rock quarries to factor in an optimum gradation solution. Carollo Engineers will also review the results of the 1998 ballast cross section inspection, prior to submitting the final report, which will indicate the most effective and economical protection for the outfall. Basis of Recommendation 1. The analysis provided in the February 1998 engineering report suggests that almost one mile of the outfall needs to be reinforced with larger sized rocks. Actual physical tests will refine the appropriate size of the work required and identify the reach of outfall that needs the support. The final refined estimate may be reduced approximately 10-30% ($1,000,000 -$4,000,000), should the actual physical lest results indicate the need of placing smaller sized rock and/or less rock around the outfall. 2. Results of the physical wave tank modeling conducted in the near shore zone (Station 27+00 to 50+00) are inconclusive. e..m.a 1� Page 4 y ALTERNATIVES a Option 1 — No further action This alternative involves halting any further studies regarding the protective ballast armor, disregarding the analysis conducted in the engineering report that indicates the need for additional ballast, and relying on the original design and current condition of the 120-inch ouffall to continue to protect the outfall from wave forces well into the future. Although this option is the least expensive, it is also the most risky approach, a Option 2 — Use existing analysis to re-rock the 120-inch outfall This alternative involves halting any further studies (ie., wave tank modeling), and adopting the recommendation to re-rock the section of the 120-inch outfall identified in the engineering report and as determined by the recent wave tank testing. This approach is more responsive than alternative 1, and would provide additional protection to the 120-inch outfall. However, it is not deemed to be the most cost-effective approach. a Option 3— Proceed with additional Wave Tank Modeling to further investigate the need to re-rock the 120-inch outfall (recommended) This alternative involves conducting additional physical wave tank modeling to better define the need for additional rock. The testing will examine the unique design of protecting the outfall by placing additional ballast over the existing armament system, and will determine the most effective and economical protection for the ouffall by limiting projected wave damage in the future. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report CJHJak QW91obal%genda Draft ReporlslPDCU.39U39-Addendum6.AR 110499.dm Re 1P Page 5 Ile- BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Investigation and Repair -Ocean Outfalls JOB NO. J-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE TO DATE(%) Distna-Design Phase $ 225,260 $ 225.260 $ 225,260 $ 225.260 $ 160,000 71% Design ConsultenVContmctors $ 1.049,340 $ 1,049,340 $ 714.697 $ 57.764 $ 772.461 $ 590,000 76% Construction Contmet $ $ $ $ - $ District-Construction Conlrect $ $ $ $ - $ Contingency $ $ $ $ - $ TOTAL $ 1,274.600 $ - $ 1.274.600 $ 939,957 $ 57,764 $ 997,721 $ 750,000 75% GmtglopaMgeou OmR n ,,U➢O -3%49 Addendum No.6 BudgeRlEl.xlsl0lstrM Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-39 Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls Total Project Budget: $1,274,600 Consultant: Carollo Enalneers. inc. Start Dale of Project: March 1996 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3127196 Original Investigation and minor repair to ocean ouffalls $433.260 $433.260 PSA 10/22/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-Inch outfeil $38,310 $471,570 4/06/98 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgale repair $23.090 $494,660 8/01/98 3 Provide assistance during bid&construction of endgate repair $21,770 $516.430 3115199 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling)needed to refine $109.860 $626,290 recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-Inch ocean oudall 10/1199 5 Revise the cost allocation by line item to cover additional costs incurred by $0 $626,290 Carollo Engineers. Pending 6 Provide engineering services to conduct additional wave tank modeling $57,764 $684,054 needed to refine recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-inch ocean outfall H:1wp.dtalengQ08S 8 CONTRACTSU-39LL39 PSA status report A= FAHR COMMITTEE "1BetlngDat. T°" u/ro/� 11/17/99 AGENDA REPORT IFAHR9 2 I[e 14(C) FAHe9&92 Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the ALiquid Operating Monies=_ and for the ALong-Term Operating Monies.-_ The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to- market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) e>»namaaemw ra aa•+a:r+ewmvassed,e aam a.�mmwwmia�=ra: A„„a. 1 W 7M, Pagel r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts Oct. 31, 1999 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 12,755,013 5A Union Bank Checking Amount 345,903 - Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,276,000 4.6 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 19,140,980 4.8 PIMCO-Lang-tern Portfolio 268.351,588 4.7 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,907 5.1 Debt Service Reserves C Trustees 32.157,314 6.1 Petty Cash 4.400 - TOTAL $335,033,105 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report GGS:SK:Ic \MOonWCIMy NeNn121INavnelF/Me1FliIA.Np/T,ueurefe qep I.M,bs Page 2 ReportMonthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances $400,000,00. :❖.❖a .0000 ❖:❖S ❖:❖:� :❖:❖:� •:❖:•:� .❖.❖a .❖.00• .❖.❖a .❖.❖a :❖.❖a .❖.❖a ..... ..... !.❖.•.0 >.❖.•.o ❖.❖.o �.❖.❖. ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ....� ..... ❖.❖.0 ❖.❖.o ❖.❖.o �.❖.❖. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash 0 . MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1999) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Cumm Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $19,172,765 • Mellon $19,140,980 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $19,192,758 • Mellon $19,187,693 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION OF Portfolio: 0.20 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( aiMoss)of 1%Change: $39,754 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 01y. 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 72% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.46 0.41 3 Months: 1.32 1.20 12 Months: 5.05 4.64 Year-to-Date: 4.18 3.87 Commentary In contreA m September,barred rues rase across all maWrines in October in eonix ttse to the Fed's October 5 adoption areas inanest rare tightening"bias,"end increased inaction fears (e.g.3-manh Treasury Bill rates rose 31 hunts points). • The Liquid portfolio outperformed be barchmuk by 5 basis points in October. • PIMCO's emphasis on corporates and agencies added to portfolio tatume. PIMCO will conanue to hold high quality commercial papa and short-term notes to enhance returns. nt,,V)N . NEYaFDLQ/wa.Mi MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1999) Long-Term Operating Monfes(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $268,822,907 • Mellon $268,351,588 Historical Cost: $272,398,646 • PIMCO $272,747,687 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.30 Of Index: 2.33 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,259,285 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 31% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance' Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.38 0.23 3 Months: 1.41 1.25 12 Months: 2.50 2.20 Year-to-Date: 2.02 2.01 Commentary Wit interest rates rising across all maturitics in October,the bond market showed weaker returns. The Long-Term portfolio outperformed its benchmark by IS basis points in October. PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage.backed secusales and Corporates added to portfolio returns,as these were to best performing sectera PIMCO will continue to emphasize mortgage-backed securities to enhance rearms. x:i...wixvicevem..wevarnLrroszarr Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE:' 1 BASE. USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-OCT-1999 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS PAYABLES 499,786.25 -499,796.25 -2.580/o 0.00 TOTAL 499,796.25 499,786.25 .2.588/6 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,666,144.00 2,666,144.00 13.76% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,131.67 17.61% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,952,174.45 1,952,174.45 10.08% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 2,189,978.36 ZI89,978.36 11.31% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 43,156.75 43,156.75 0.22% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,262,635.23 10,262,635.23 52,98% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS ———————f,7_6TASA.98 9,762,848.98 50.40% 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 4,689,174.00 4,689,838.00 24.21% 1,664.00 ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 906,309.00 4.68% 396.00 BANKING&FINANCE 1,949,359.25 1,925,310.25 9.94% -24,049.00 INDUSTRIAL 1,370,198.00 1,356,673.50 7.00% -13,524.50 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 511,200.00 500,000.00 2.58% -11,200.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,424,844.25 9,378,130.75 48.42% -46,713.50 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 130.75 4 . 2% 6,713. OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESMECEIVABLES 228,594.01 228,594.01 1.18% 0.00 TOTAL 228,594.01 229,594.01 1.18% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS T 222 ,3fC.6 -------------T.T9 0.00 09-Now1999 10:31:31 Ewculow Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-OCT-1999 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,416,287.24 19,369,573.74 100.00% 46,71330 09-Nw-1999 10:31:31 Exs jw Wwkbrwh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE. USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-OCT-1999 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -38,848.74 -38,948.74 -0.01% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 21,319,402.63 21,319,402.63 7.85% 0.00 PAYABLES -48,111,903.13 48,111,903.13 -17.71% 0.00 TOTAL -26,931,349.24 -26,831,349.24 -9.88% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 25,679,645.55 25,679,645.55 9.45% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 14,935,060.83 14,835,060.83 5.46% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 404,715.00 404,715.00 0.15% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 40,919,421.38 40,919,421.38 15.06% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,098,072.14 14,088,072.14 5.19% 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 66,326,172.33 64,924,012.13 23.86% -1,502,160.20 U.S.AGENCIES 65,699,797.82 64,373,009.06 23.69% -1,326,788.76 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 20,256,975.00 20,498,960.00 7.54% 242,085.00 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,924,074.02 3,885,422.98 1.43% .38,651.04 FHLMC POOLS 9,414,924.17 9,289,433.95 3.42% -126,490.22 FHLMC MULTICLASS 8,444,788.79 8,336,557.94 3.07% -108,230.85 FNMA POOLS 1,686,949.82 1,693,305.41 0.62% 6,355.59 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 89,082.99 89,026.88 0.03% -56.11 ABS:CAR LOAN 603,942.00 604,206.00 0.22% 264.00 ABS:HOME EQUITY 487.349.66 486,740.47 0.18% -609.19 MUTUALFUNDS 1,000,000.00 989,900.00 0.36% -10,100.00 BANKING&FINANCE 54,047,184.00 53,824,774.50 19.81% ,222,409.50 INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 15,967,946.05 5.880A .1,062,022.95 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,986,120.00 0.73% -165,130.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,415,100.00 2.73% -82,155.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 253,659,614.60 254,263,515.37 93.58% .4,396,099.23 09-Nov4999 10.34.57 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-OCT-1999 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P/MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 258,659,614.60 254,263,515.37 93.58% 4,3%,099.23 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,351,280.55 3,351,280.55 1.23% 0.00 TOTAL 3,351,280.55 3,35L280.55 1.23% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 1 80. ,351,280. NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 276,098,967.29 271,702,868.06 100.00% 4,3%,0".23 09-Nov-/999 /0:34:57 Fiecutive Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I OCSF00511102 1999/10/32 RUN DATE ' 11/05/99 DISTAICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 13.13.36 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 43,156.75 DREYBUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.673 AAA 100.000 43,156.75 .42 996095247 AAA 43,156.75 .22 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HIS COSP DISC 4.846 .000 P-1 97.609 1,952,274.45 11.02 313396NU MAT 11/02/1999 A-1♦ 1,952,174.45 9.94 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 4.940 .000 P-1 93.563 878,069.00 8.55 38142UY30 11/03/1999 978,069.00 4.43 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 97.462 3,411,181.67 33.23 912395DR4 03102/20U0 DO 03/04/99 A-lf 3,411,181.67 13.32 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HIS ASSN DISC 5.132 .000 P-1 99.953 499,786.25 4.86 313588HV3 MAY 11/04/1999 A-1♦ 499,706.25 2.54 800,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN DISC 5.239 .000 P-1 99.249 793,991.11 0.33 313588QQ1 MAT 12/17/1999 A-13 793,991.11 4.04 900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISC NTS 5.262 .000 P-1 99.538 896,201.00 8.33 313588NU5 MAY 11/03/1999 A-l♦ 896,201.00 4.56 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.333 .000 P-1 99.382 894,435.00 8.31 36959OYM0 12/17/1999 894,435.00 4.55 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.338 .000 P-1 99.293 893,640.00 8.30 63743DZ87 12/08/1999 893.640.D0 4.55 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.998 .034 10,262,635.23 100.00 10,262,635.23 52.24 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DENS .000 4.303 AAA 99.968 999,200.00 10.65 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO OS/18/99 AAA 999,680.00 5.09 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MINI 5.001 8.000 AA3 100.000 $11,200.00 5.33 264399DB9 B.ODOB 11/01/1991 DO 11/01/94 AA- 500,000.00 2.55 950,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 3.123 A2 1GO.031 863,753.00 9.06 118154BX4 3.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 A 850,263.50 4.33 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE l OCSM7511102 1999/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/99 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.36 ------------- PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARXET TOTAL COST/ a TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL 900,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP HIS 5.305 6.252 A2 99.991 909,657.00 9.59 3I042MIG2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DD O1/11/14 A 899,739.00 4.58 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTH #SB00110 5.653 8.421 A3 100.347 515,125.00 5.35 993SOMEPI 8.4508 01/12/2DU0 UP O1/12/95 A 501,735.00 2.55 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE COME DUE 5.815 4.848 AAA 99.734 3,600,974.00 39.34 3133M7EM2 4.835% 01/29/2000 DD 01/28/99 AAA 3,690,158.00 18.39 900,000.00 FORD HTR CR MTN i TR 00539 6.312 6.971 Al 100.701 905,913.00 9.66 345402YXI 7.020% 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 906,309.00 4.61 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS ULOGS MTV TR 00252 6.353 6.413 A3 99.I90 400,216.00 4.25 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,160.00 2.03 500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 1.535 9.531 A3 101.282 506,445.00 5.39 46014W2 9.300% 03/15/2D00 DO 03/21/90 BBB. 506,410.00 2.58 125,000.00 FIDOVA CAP CORD 6.924 6.392 BAA1 99.741 124,361.25 1.32 318074AF0 6.3751 10/15/2000 DD 1D/11/95 A- 124,676.25 .63 _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.616 5.9B1 9,424,844.25 100.00 9,3I8,130.75 47.34 _______ _______ _______________ --------- TOTAL 4.805 3.045 19,687,419.48 100.00 19,640,765.99 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSFO7522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE t 11/05/99 DISTRICT[ LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.13.36 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 404,715.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.673 AAA 100.000 404,715.00 .98 996085247 AAA 404,715.00 .14 6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 5.303 .000 P-1 99.575 6t511t928.00 16.O6 03018BY45 11/04/1999 6,501,928.00 2.23 5,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 5.306 .000 P-1 99.691 5,283,645.00 12.91 ]42)1SYH2 11/17/1999 5,283,645.08 1.39 500,000.00 HEINS NJ CO DISC 5.308 .DDO P-1 99.472 491t360.00 1.21 42307KZ18 12/01/1999 49It360.00 .17 6,300,000.00 DO PONT DE REMOVE DISC 5.326 .000 P-1 99.514 6,269,392.50 15.32 26354BY89 11/08/1999 6,269,392.50 2.12 5,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.341 .000 P-1 99.308 5,362,605.56 13.10 63743DZ87 12/08/1999 5,362,605.56 1.82 1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.343 .000 P-1 99.689 1,694,714.41 4.14 36959JYHO 11/17/1999 1,694,714.41 .51 14,900,000.00 FEDERAL MOVE LN MW CORP DISC 26.264 .000 P-1 99.564 14,835,060.83 36.25 313396MI MAT 11/04/1999 A-1+ 14,835,060.93 5.03 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 7.370 .106 40,919,421.38 100.00 40,919,421.39 13.87 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.903 Al 99.867 1,992,800.00 .78 066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,991t340.00 .66 3t500t000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN ITR00615 .000 S.SSI Al 99.828 3,498,635.00 1.37 1712OOEOD FLTG RT OB/08/2002 DD 04/08/99 A+ 3,493,980.00 1.18 2,000,000.00 FORD MTN CA CO TERN ENHANCED .000 5.606 Al 99.812 1,990,613.60 .78 345397SCO FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/90 A 1t996t240.00 .68 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN .000 5.596 A2 100.000 3,010,830.00 1.17 37042MVR9 MEG RT 12/13/2DOl DO 12/15/98 A 3,000,000.00 1.02 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS FADE 4 OCSF07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/99 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.36 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOUR YIELD S-P PRICE HARKET VALUE \ TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.567 A2 I00.001 3,91B,368.50 1.55 330425GV5 FLTG AT 08/18/2003 DO OB/13/98 A 3,950,039.50 1.34 2,000,000.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NTS .000 5.453 A3 100.443 2,000,000.00 .79 42332BBKB FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DO O6/25/99 A- 2,008,860.00 .69 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINE NTH BTR 00246 .000 5.657 A3 100.680 3,000,000.00 1.18 42333NLF7 TIM RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 3,020,400.00 1.02 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CO MTN .000 5.442 A2 100.125 4,CG0o000.00 1.53 44181KEAS FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/90 A. 4,005,000.00 1.36 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN ME SR IOOSJO .000 5.233 A2 100.181 999,188.90 .39 44181KET4 PLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,001,810.00 .34 7,302,960.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.693 3.648 AAA 99.335 7,271,803.32 2.85 9128273AB 3.625% O7/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 AAA 3,257,316.50 2.46 10,546,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.322 3.541 AAA 95.312 10,267,075.00 3.95 9128212M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 AAA 30,051,698.83 3.41 4,OD0,000.00 HORGAN STANLEY NTH 4TR 00299 5.170 5.461 AA 99.609 3,997,780.00 1.56 6174SENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 A9 3,984,360.00 1.35 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.533 AAA 116.703 6,233,593.75 2.29 912810DES 11.325E 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/03 AAA 5,935,150.00 1.98 2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.314 AAA IGO.969 2,167,321.15 .83 912823X54 06.335E 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,120,349.00 .32 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.892 AAA 120.172 6,698,250.00 2.45 912810MO 11.835E 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/03 AAA 6,248,944.00 2.12 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.518 AA3 99.026 1,543,215.00 .59 046003HYS 6.500E 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,495,890.00 .51 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.360 5.953 A3 99.240 999,730.00 .38 42333HXJO 5.350E 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 902o40O.00 .33 1,200,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.368 6.430 AAA 101.094 1,213,406.25 .43 912823Y22 06.500E 05/31/2001 DO 05/31/96 AAA 1,213,128.00 .41 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.004 6.639 A2 97.921 2,060,739.00 .33 011400GN6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,963,316.05 .63 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 5 OCSF03522202 1919/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/99 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.13.36 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __________ 23,420,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.807 5.644 AAA 99.656 23,351,289.85 9.10 9128275QI 05.625% 09/30/2001 DD 09/30/99 AAA 23,349,400.80 7.91 5,000,000.00 U B TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.197 AAA 100.859 5,006,402.25 1.98 9128232L5 06.250% 02/20/2002 DO 02/29/97 AAA 5,042,950.00 1.31 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.949 6.919 A2 98.671 3,073,170.00 1.16 812400JAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 OD 07/09/97 A- 2,960,130.00 1.00 14,350,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN MIN 5.882 6.249 AAA 91.375 14,560,462.50 5.30 31364GLD9 5.910% 12/15/2008 OD 12/15/90 AAA 13,477,812.50 4.57 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 5.982 5.856 ml 99.906 5,996,400.00 2.35 63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/90 AA- 5,994,360.00 2.03 165,394.90 PHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1534 E 5.912 5.913 99.710 664,459.18 .26 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 663,510.49 .22 15,000,00G.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN NTH 5.981 5.959 AAA 99.329 14,955,300.00 5.85 31364G2VO 5.620% 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,899,200.00 5.05 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.393 AA3 99.022 2,526,725.00 .98 59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,493,050.00 .84 3,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.069 AAA 98.868 7,497,255.00 2.91 079967AXS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 AAA 7,415,100.00 2.51 12,5U0,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BIG CORP DEBS 6.062 6.026 AAA 99.595 12,485,625.00 4.09 3134A3EHI 6.000% 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/59 AAA 12,446,875.00 4.22 2,000,000.00 SANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 6.133 6.206 A2 98.700 1,999,600.00 .33 06605TAL6 6.1250 03/15/2002 US 03/12/99 A 1,974,000.00 .63 89,083.00 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.204 RAI, 99.937 89,D82.99 .03 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 89,026.88 .03 I,OOD,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN ITN, 00004 6.201 6.263 A3 98.990 1,000,000.00 .30 73317FADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB. 989,9DO.00 .34 2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 6.207 6.088 AAA 98.562 2,455,859.38 .96 3133TKKU3 6.0001 11/15/2011 AAA 2,464,050.00 .83 487,349.66 GREEN TREE CORD 99-0 CL A-1 6.290 6.298 AAA 99.875 487,349.66 .19 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DD 09/26/99 AAA 486,740.47 .16 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSP07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DAM t 11/05/99 DISTBICTs LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME i 13.13.36 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ____-----_ 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN NON 6.291 6.239 AAA 99.959 4,499,705.00 1.76 31364CWS 6.030E 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/57 AAA 4.493r655.00 1.52 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN PUMA COPI 125 6.306 6.292 AM 97.906 714.915.63 .28 IIFOI16BO VAR RT 11/01/2039 AAA 714,715.63 .24 600,000.00 FORD NTR CR MTB 4 TR 00538 6.312 6.971 Al 100.701 603,942.00 .23 345402YXI 7.020E 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 604,206.00 .20 3.319.951.18 FNLMC MULTICLKSS CM E3 A 6.316 5.989 AAA 18.610 3,323,582.23 1.26 3133TCE95 6.324E 09/15/2032 AAA 3,274,069.45 1.11 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.015 A2 99.040 2,031,960.00 .73 073902ARI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 1,990,800.00 .63 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNNA 6P MTG 6.342 6.465 AAA 92.812 5.334,375.00 2.28 OSN0606B3 6.000E 11/15/2028 AAA 5,000.350.00 1.93 5.000,000.OD LEGMAN BRUN ELMS MTH 100196 6.364 6.654 A3 99.937 5,039,450.00 1.96 52517PJD4 6.650E 11/09/2000 DO 11/08/96 A 4,996,850.00 1.69 2,000,000.00 FNLW_ MULTICLA88 CTP T11 A6 6.416 6.719 AAA 96.746 2,000,888.00 .76 3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2016 AAA 1,934,920.00 .66 21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNNA SF MTG 6.518 6.813 AAA 95.344 20,256,875.00 8.06 OIN062615 6.500E 01/15/2029 AAA 20.498.960.00 6.94 2,351,117.35 FBLMC MULTICLASS CTP HER 16205 6.540 6.909 AM 96.847 2,194,977.41 .80 3133TI7A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,041,878.65 .69 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 9.172 A2 100.052 9,103,700.00 3.56 318154BB2 9.250E 02/15/2000 A 9,076r680.00 3.03 9,270,071.19 FIRMC GROUP 1G5-0476 6.628 6.906 AAA 100.196 9,414,924.17 3.65 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 9,288,433.95 3.15 2,199,015.99 SERA, II POOL 4080098M 6.305 6.323 AAA 100.828 2,246,097.58 .87 36225CC20 6.315E 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 2,216,215.56 .75 10,500,000.00 PBDERAL BONE IN MTG CORP DEBS 6.711 6.450 AAA 97.672 10,323,075.00 4.03 3134A31C0 6.300E 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,255,560.00 3.47 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR HT 6.717 6.733 A2 98.391 1,992,280.00 .YJ 571748A88 6.62SE 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,967.820.00 .67 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE OCSE07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/99 DISTRICT: TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.36 PAR VALUE FIX AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE EXPERT VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.759 Al 99.129 2,995,060.00 1.16 345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 2,973,870.00 1.01 2.500,000.DO COUNTRYWIDE ROMB LEE INC NT 6.066 6.918 A3 99.021 2,498,400.00 .97 22237UAB0 6.050% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,475,525.00 .84 1,650,637.75 GUM II POOL 10080023 6.869 6.057 AM 101.125 1,677,976.44 .65 36225CA29 6.125E 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,669,207.42 .57 992,867.21 VERA POOL 00252703 6.877 6.595 AAA 98.562 972,234.19 .38 31371HU48 6.500% 09/01/2006 DO 08/01/99 AM 978.509.78 .33 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.940 AAA 140.203 4,029,030.31 1.45 912810DJ4 13.2500 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/64 AM 3,705,075.00 1.26 2.000,ODO.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.257 BM3 99.306 2,151,250.00 .78 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 1,986,120.00 .67 970,530.37 NMP/NUNTOON PAIGE 1PC98-10 FAA 7.684 7.667 AM 97.828 957,277.91 .37 302998GE3 7.500E 11/15/2030 DD 10/21/99 AM 957,277.91 .32 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.672 6.057 258,659,614.60 100.00 254,263,515.37 86.15 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.724 5.943 299,579,035.98 100.00 295,182,936.75 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR SEPT 05-Oct-1999 -1.70 NA9123459 0.00 CW 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR SEPT 05-Oc1-1999 .6.80 NA9123459 0.00 CW 05-OM-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 21-Oct-1999 -0.85 99363C783 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 22-Oct-1999 -0.85 99363D732 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 22-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-Oct-1999 .0.85 99363E607 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26.Oct-1999 -0.85 99363F737 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 26-Oct-1999 0.00 PURCHASES 09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Eucutive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 117,407.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oct-1999 ,117,407.64 996095247 01-Oct-1999 117,407.64 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2M67.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oc1-1999 -29,567.42 996085247 01-Oct-1999 28,567.42 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 117,407.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OG-1999 -117,407.64 996085247 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 01-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 28,567.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Otl-1999 -28,567.42 996085247 01-Oc1-1999 0.00 FC 01-00-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,342,890.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Oct-1999 -13,342,890.62 996085247 04-Ocb1999 13,342,890.62 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,342,890.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Oct-1999 -13,342,890.62 9%085247 04-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 04.OG-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,797.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 -3,797.30 996085247 05-00-1999 3,797.30 B 0.00 09-No 1999 10:07:55 Eeecutiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,797.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-00-1999 -3,797.30 996085247 05-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9D0,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Oc1-1999 -8%,201.00 313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 05-Oct-1999 996,201.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.DO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Oct-1999 -996,201.00 313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,90000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Oct-1999 -14,935,060.83 313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 05-0ct-1999 14,835,060.83 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Oct-1999 -14,835,060.93 313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 05-Oc1-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,565.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oc1-1999 -5,565.00 996085247 06-Oc1-1999 5,565.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,565.OD DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oc1-1999 -5,565.00 996085247 06-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 06-Oct-1999 0.00 09-New1999 /0:07:55 Ececuti.Warkbeec6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 06-Get-1999 -6,571,928.00 03018BY45 11/04/1999 06-Oct-1999 6,571,929.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 06-Oct-1999 -6,571,928.00 03018BY45 11/04/1999 06-0ct-1999 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 06-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-0a-1999 -894,435.00 369591YHO 11/17/1999 06-Oa-1999 894,435.00 D GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-Oct-1999 -894.433.00 36959JYHO 11/17/1999 06-Oc1.1999 0.00 PC GENERAL ELECTRIC 06-0a-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,300,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 06-Oc1-1999 -6,269,392.50 26354BY89 11/09/1999 06-0a-1999 6,269,392.50 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,300,000.00 DUPONT DENEMOUR DISC 06-Ott-1999 -6,269,392.50 26354BY89 1[10811999 06-0a-1999 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Oa-1999 -175,500.00 996085247 07-Ott-1999 175,500.00 B 0.00 09-No 1999 10..07:55 &c wiw IVwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Oct-1999 -175,500.00 996085247 07.Oct-1999 0.00 FC 07.Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-W-1999 -165.33 996085247 09-00-1999 165.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Oct-1999 -165.33 996035247 08-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 08-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-0ct-1999 •299,934.67 313588MW2 MAT 10/12I999 09-Oct-1999 299.834.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Oa-1999 ,299,834.67 313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 08-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY OS-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 295,670.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Oct-1999 -295,670.60 996085247 13-Oct-1999 295,670.60 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 295,670.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Oct-1999 -295,670.60 996085247 13-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 13-0a-1999 0.00 09-No 1999 I0:07,55 &emliw WmkbeMh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 33,412.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Oct-1999 -33,412.22 996085247 15-Oct-1999 33,412.22 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 33,412.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Oct-1999 -33,412.2E 996085247 15-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 330,392.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OctI999 -530,392.87 996085247 15-Oct-1999 530,392.97 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 530.392.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-00-1999 -530.392.97 996085247 15-0ct-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Oct-1999 499.712.79 313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 15-Oct-1999 499,712.78 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Oct-1999 499,712.78 313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 15-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4.321.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Oct-1999 4,321.88 996085247 18-Oct-1999 4,321.88 B 0.00 09-Now/999 10:07 55 &ecMiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocs0000loo00 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,321.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Get-1999 4,321.38 996085247 IS-Oct-1999 0.00 FC I8-oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,130.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 1wa-1999 -47.130.50 996095247 IS-Oet-1999 47,130.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,130.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18.Oct-1999 -47.130.50 996085247 I"d.1999 0.00 FC 18-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,416.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-00-1999 -5,416.25 996085247 20-Oct-1999 5,416.25 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,416.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASII MGMT 20.0ct-1999 -5.416.25 996085247 20.Oct-1999 0.00 FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 896,992.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Oct-1999 -896,992.96 996085247 20-Oc1-1999 896,992.96 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 896,992.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Oct-1999 .89C992.96 996085247 20-0ct-1999 0.00 FC 20.Od-1999 0.00 09-Nowl999 /0:07:55 Executive Wakbewh Q RANGE O COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 99363C783 05.000 1021/1999 DD 10/20/ 20-Oct-1999 900,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 1020/ 20-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 20-Oa-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20.544.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .20,544.19 996085247 21-Oct-1999 20,544.19 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,544.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .20,544.19 996085247 21-Oct-1999 0.00 PC 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,484.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct.1999 -6,484A5 996085247 21-Oct-1999 6,484.15 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,484.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .6,484.15 996085247 21-Oct-1999 0.00 PC 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 9936313732 05.080%10/22/1999 DD 1021/ 21-Oc1-1999 900,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 -.W—.1009 M075.5 &ecufive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 9936313732 05.080%10/22/1999 DO 10/211 21.OM-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21.Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oct-1999 -198,596.67 63743DZ87 IV08/1999 21.Oct-1999 198.596.67 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21.OU-1999 ,198,586.67 63743D787 121WI999 21-Oct-1999 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oc1-1999 ,893,640.00 63743DZ87 12/08/1999 21-Oct-1999 893,640.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oc1-1999 -893,640.00 63743DZ87 12/M1999 21-Ord-1999 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 126.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-0m-1999 .126.15 996085247 22Ad.1999 126.15 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 126.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22.Oc1.1999 .126.15 9%085247 22-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 22.Ocb1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Erecu(ive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,981.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Oct-I999 -35,98111 996085247 22-Oct-1999 35.981.11 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,991.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Oct-1999 -35,991.11 996085247 22-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 22-OM-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 22-Oct-1999 -5,164,018.89 63743DZ87 12/08/1999 22-OU-1999 5,164,018.89 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 99363E607 05.020%1025/1999 DD 10221 22-Oct-1999 900,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 22-Oct-1999 -5,164,018.89 63743DZ87 12/08/1999 22-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 90D,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO - 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 99363E607 05.020561025119"DO 10221 22-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 421,430.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-00-1999 421,430.50 996095247 25-0U-1999 421,430.50 B 0.00 09-No 1999 10.07:55 Ececutm Workbench Q ORANGE E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, /1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 421,430.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25.Oc1-1999 421,430.50 996085247 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 -800,000.00 99363F737 05.0501/o 1012 6/1 9 9 9 DO 10/25/ 25-Oct-1999 800,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 -800.000.00 99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DD 101251 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6.120.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 -6,120.26 996085247 26-Od-1999 6,120.26 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,120.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 -6,120.26 996085247 26-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 26-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 HEINZ HI CO DISC 26-Oct-1999 497,360.00 42307KZIS 12/01/1999 26-Oct-1999 497,360.00 B MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 HEINZ HJ CO DISC 260ct-1999 497,360.00 42307KZIS 12/01/1999 26-Oct-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED[NCO 26-Od-1999 0.00 09-Nav-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 26-00-1999 -793,991.11 313598QQI MAT 12/17/1999 26-Oct-1999 793,991.11 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 26.Od-1999 -793,991.11 313589QQI MAT 12/17/1999 26-Oa-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 26-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21640.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Oct-1999 -21,640.51 996GS5247 27-Oct-1999 21,640.51 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21.640.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Oct-1999 -21,640.51 996095247 27-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 27-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,70D,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 27-Oct-1999 -1,694,714.41 36959JYHO 11/17/1999 27-Oct-1999 1,694,714.41 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 27.On-1999 -1,694,714.41 36959JYHO 11/17/1999 27-0ct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MG NY 27-Oct-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 5,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 27.Oct-1999 -5,293,645.08 74271SYH2 11/17/1999 27-0c1.1999 5,293,645.08 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 09-,V 4999 10:07.55 Exmim Wwkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. /3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 27-Oct-1999 -5,283,645.03 74271SYH2 11/17/1999 27-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,712.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 2Wct-1999 42,712.92 996085247 28-Oct-1999 42,712.92 0 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,712.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Oct-1999 -42,712.92 996095247 28-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 28-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39.720.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Oct-1999 -38,720.24 996085247 29-Oct-1999 38,720.24 0 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 38,720.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Oct-1999 -39,720.24 996095247 29-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 29-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-Oct-1999 -499,786.25 313588NV3 MAT 11/04119" 01-Nov-1999 499,786.25 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Sep-1999 -9,989,697.50 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2029 21-Oct4999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-Oct-1999 0.00 no-V-1999 100755 Ezeartive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Sep-1999 -11,290,000.00 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Oct-t999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 713,118.75 11 F0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 -713,118.75 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Scp-1999 -713,119.75 I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/01/2029 25-Oct-1999 713,119.75 R GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 -713,118.75 IIFO116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Sep-1999 -5,781,250.00 OIN11606A9 6.000%10/152028 21-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF 2146 QT 29-Scp-1999 -2,457,109.38 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 D4-Oct-1999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 04-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 -953,125.00 OIN0626B3 6.50OV 11/012029 22-Nov-1999 953,125.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Erecmive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINnOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oet-1999 -10.494,375.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/012029 22-Nov-1999 10,494,375.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 06-00-1999 -506.445.00 460146Al2 9.700%03/152000 DD 0321N 12-0ct-1999 506,445.00 0 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 0&Oct-1999 -3,637.50 460146Al2 9.700%031152000 DD 03/2119 12-0ct-1999 0.00 I 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 06-0M-1999 -510,092.50 460146Al2 9.700%03/152000 DO 03/2119 12-00-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CONY 12.0O.1999 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O9-0O.1999 -1,213,406.25 912827Y22 06.500%05212001 DD05131/ 12-00-1999 1,213,406.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-0ct-1999 -28,557.38 912827Y22 06.500°/.O5/312001 DO 05/311 12-00-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-00-1999 -1,241,963.63 912827Y22 06.500%05212001 DD0521/ 12.Oct-1999 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 12-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:O7:53 - Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Od-1999 -23,351,289.85 9128275QI 05.625%09130/2001 DO 09130/ 13-Oct-1999 23,351,299.95 B BARCLAYS BANK.NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Oc1-1999 -46,811.99 9128275QI 05.625%09/302001 DO 09/30/ 13-Oct-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Oct-1999 -23,398,101.94 912827SQ1 05.625%09/3012001 DO 09/30/ 13-Oc1-1999 0.00 FC BARCLAYS BANK NEW YORK 13-0ct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTG 12-Oct-1999 -9,968,437.50 OI1,1062683 6.500%11/152029 22-Nov-1999 9,%8,437.50 B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -3,688,974.00 3133M7EW2 4.835%0128/2000 DO 01/2919 13-Oct-1999 3,688,974.00 B MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -37,269.79 3133M7EW2 4.835%01/29/2000 DO OV2819 13-Oct-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -3,726,243.79 3133M7EW2 4.835%0128/2000 DO 0128/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 13-Oct-1999 0.00 09-,V 4999 10:07.55 Executive IPwkbenc6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 978,530.37 WMPlHUNTOON PAIGE SPC98-10F 13-Oct-1999 -957.277.91 302998GE3 7.500%11/15/2030 DO 10/2119 20-Oct-1999 957,277.91 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 978,530.37 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE OPC99-10 F 13.Oct-1999 -3,873.35 302998GE3 7.500%11/15/2030 DO 10/21/9 20-Oct-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 978,530.37 WMPtHUNTOON PAIGE SPC98-10F 13-0q-1999 -961,15126 302998GE3 7.500%11/152030 DO 1021/9 20-Oct-1999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 29-Od-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000,00 FORD MTR CR MTN 0 TR 00538 14-Oct-1999 ,905,913.00 345402YKI 7.020%10(102000 DO 10/10N 19-OU-1999 905,913.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00539 14-Oct-1999 -4579.50 345402YKI 7.020%I WI02000 DO 10/1019 19.Oc1-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 4 TR 00538 14-Oc1-1999 -907,492.50 345402YKI 7.020%10/102000 DO 10/10/9 19-Oct-1999 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 19-0ct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 4 TR 00538 14.0ct-1999 -603,942.00 345402YKI 7.020%101102WO DO IW 10/9 19-Oc1-1999 603,942.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 09-No 1999 10.07.55 Executive W.,*bench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN#TR 00539 14-0c61999 .1,053.00 345402YKI 7.020%10/10/2000 DD 10/10/9 19-Oct-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN#TR 00538 I COc1-1999 -604,995.00 345402YKI 7.020%10/10/2000 DO 10/1019 19-Oct-1999 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 19-0ct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG IB-Oct-1999 .5,734,375.00 OIN0606B7 6.000%11/15/2028 22-Nov-1999 5,734,375.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA COF1125 18-Oct-1999 -714,715.63 11F011688 6.160%11/012029 23-No,1999 714,715.63 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-Oct-1999 -124,361.25 318074AF8 6.375%10/152000 DO 10/1119 25-Oct-1999 124,361.25 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-0n-1999 -221.35 318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DO 10111/9 25-Oct4999 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-Oct-1999 -124,582.60 318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DO 10111/9 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-/999 /0:07:55 Executive Wo kbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURONMASFMTG 27-Oct-1999 -9,896,250.00 OIN062615 6.500%01115=9 25-Jan-2000 9,896,250.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTO 27-Oa-1999 -10,360,625.00 OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2029 25-Ian-2000 10,360,625.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -17,640.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 17,640.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 .17,640.00 9129273AS 3.625%07115/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 0.00 PC 29-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -25,500.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD OI/I S/ 15-Jul-1999 25,500.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25.500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -25.500.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 011151 15-Jul-1999 0.00 FC 29.Oct-1999 0.00 09-No 1999 10;07;55 Fs ullva Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Ott-1999 -22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/1512032 01-Oct-1999 22.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIT E3 A 01-00-1999 -22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-0ct-1999 0.00 FC I"c1-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11497.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Oct-1999 -11,697.01 3133T17A4 6.000'/.11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-0ct-1999 11,697.01 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11.697.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CfF SER 162 01-Oct-1999 -11,697.01 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 18-Oct-1999 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -635,067.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 635,067.63 996085247 05-Oct-1999 -635,067.63 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -635,067.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 635,067.63 996085247 05-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 05-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 /0:07:55 Erecmive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000/o600 01-OCT-1"9-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,841,320.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oct-1999 12,941,320.50 996085247 06-Oct-1999 -12.841,320.50 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,841,320.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oct-1999 12,841,320.50 996085247 06-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 06-0ct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -285,410.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-1999 295,410.97 996085247 12-0ct-1999 -285,410.97 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -110,389.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oa-1999 110,388.17 996085247 12-Oct-1999 -110,398.17 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -285,410.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-W-1999 285,410.97 996085247 12-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 12-0ct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -110.388.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-1999 110.389.17 996085247 12-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 12-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I2-Oct-1999 97,608.72 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 12-Oct-1999 -97,609.72 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 09-Nw4999 10.07:55 Eimam IVmkbmh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-00-1999 2,085.61 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/19" 12.Oct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12.00.1999 99,694.33 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 12.Oc1-1999 0.00 PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 12.Oc1.1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 13-00-1999 4,483,100.00 313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13.Oct-1999 4,483,100.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I3.Oct-1999 91055.00 313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13.Oct.1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I3-0cb1999 4,492,155.00 313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13-OM-1999 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Oc1-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -8,301.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19.00-1999 9,301.39 996085247 19.Oc1.1999 -9,301.39 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -8.301.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 9,301.39 996095247 19.Oct-1999 0.00 PC 19-00-1999 0.00 09.N.v-1999 10..07:55 Ewwhe Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -656,495.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 656,495.00 996095247 19-Oct-1999 -656,495.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -656,495.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 656,495.00 996085247 19-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 19-w-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 390,434.89 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 -390,434.99 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 8,756.22 3133%NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oo-1999 399,191.11 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00 PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 19-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-0ct-1999 797,133.33 313394NOO MAT 10/22/1999 20-Oct-1999 -797,133.33 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 20-Oct-1999 2,648.45 313384NGO MAT 10/27/1999 20-Oct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10.07:55 Exenrtive Workbench Qji ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-Oct-1999 799,781.78 313394NGO MAT 1022/1999 20-Oct-1999 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 900,000.00 99363C783 05.000%10/21/1999 DD I020/ 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 125.00 99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 10/20/ 21-Oct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-0n4999 900,125.00 99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 1020/ 21-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 900,000.00 99363D732 05.080%10/22/1999 DO 1021/ 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 127.00 99363D732 05.090%1022/1999 DD 1021/ 22-OU-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22.Oct-1999 900,127.00 99363D732 05.080%1022/1999 DD 1021/ 22-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22.Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nt 1999 10:07:55 Executive fVorkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -24,206.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-1999 24,206.95 996095247 25-Oct-1999 -24,206.95 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -24,206.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-1999 24,206.95 996095247 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 900,000.00 99363E607 05.020% 10/25/1999 DD 10/22/ 25-Oct-1999 -900,000.00 S LEI[MAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 376.50 99363E607 05.02W.10/25/1999 DD 10/22/ 25-0ct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 900,376.50 99363E607 05.0209/o 1025/1999 DO 10/22/ 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 25-0ct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,458,511.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 1,458,511.26 996085247 26-Oct-1999 -1,458,511.26 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,459,511.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 1,458,511.26 996085247 26-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 26-Oct-1999 0.00 094ov-/999 10:07:55 Exenrtive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Oct-1999 800,000.00 99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DO 10251 26-OU-1999 -800,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-00-1999 112.22 99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DO 10251 26-0ct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Oc1.1999 800,112.22 99363F737 05.050%1026/1999 DO 101251 2&Oct-1999 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 26-W-1999 0.00 AXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Od-1999 11,450,156.25 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Ott-1999 -11,286,847.83 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 163,308.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 11,450,156.25 OIN0626AS 6.500%10/152029 - 21-Och1999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-00-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-0a-1999 929,039.07 912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 111151 12-OU-1999 -967,825.47 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -38,786.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Oa-1999 27,513.59 912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 11/151 12-0ct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 09-No 1999 /0:07:55 Ere,.1me Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSGml0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCl'-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 USTREASURYNOTES 09-00.1999 956,552.66 912827D25 07.500%II/15/2001 DO 11115/ 12.Od-1999 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 12-0ct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12-Oct-1999 3,698,974.00 3133M7EW2 4.835%01/2820W DO 0128/9 13.Oc1.1999 -3,699,104.60 S I P MORGAN SECS INC,NEW YOR -10.130.60 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3.700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12.Oc1.1999 37,269.79 3133M7EW2 4.935%01282000 DD 01/2819 13-0ct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12-OM-1999 3,726,243.79 3133M7EW2 4.835%01282000 DO 012819 13-Oc1-1999 0.00 FC I P MORGAN SECS MC,NEW YOR 13.Oc1.1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .10.500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12.Oct-1999 9,979,921.99 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Oct-1999 -9,992,839.67 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 97,092.21 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Oc1-1999 9,979,921.98 O1N0626A5 6.500 10/152029 21-0c1-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-W-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 12.Oa-1999 19,145,293.00 31364CZY7 6.670%03272002 DD 0327/9 13-00-1999 -20,012,510.00 S BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOEIE -867.217.00 09-Nov-1999 10.07:55 W kb c6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINRASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 12-Oct-1999 56,324.44 31364CZY7 6.670%03127R002 DO 03127/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 12-Oct-1999 19.201.617.44 31364CZY7 6.670%03/27/2002 DD 03/27/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 13-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 13-Oct-1999 948,125.00 OIN0626B3 6.5009%11/012029 22-Nov-1999 -951,375.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI -3,250.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG IS-Oct-1999 5,739,990.23 OIN0606A9 6.000%10/152028 21-Oct-1999 -5,791,250.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 41,259.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 18-Oct-1999 5,739,990.23 OIN0606A9 6.0001A 10/15/2028 21-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA I ITN IS-Oct-1999 715,114.84 I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 -713,118.75 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 1,996.09 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA I ITH IB-Oct-1999 715,114.84 I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Esecotive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG0o0I0000 0I-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 27-Oct-1999 9,914,296.89 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 -9,999,437.50 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -75,140.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 27AM-1999 10,379,531.25 OIN0626133 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 -10,465,125.00 S BEAR STEARNS h CO INC.NY -85,593.75 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,160.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 -47,160.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 47,212.09 PDC 51.58 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Scp•1999 47.193.00 3133TC695 6324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 -47,234.60 PD -51.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 47,183.00 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 0.00 PC 15-Oc61999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-0ct-1999 214,369.67 3128DDQ55 TOM 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-0ct-1999 -217,719.20 PD .3,349.53 09-No 1999 /0.07:55 Exeamw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP#G5.0476 01-Oct-1999 214,369.67 3128DDQ55 7.0001/102/01/2003 DO 02/01t 01-0c1-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -44.618.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-1999 44,618.25 3133T02D5 5.9001/6 0611 V2017 01-Oct-1999 44,555.51 PD 62.74 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44.619.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-1999 44,618.25 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,017.10 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Oct-1999 30,017.10 36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01t 01-Oct-1999 -30,514.26 PD 497.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,017.10 GNMA H POOL#0080023 01-0ct-1999 30,017.10 36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,006.64 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Oct-1999 28,006.64 36225CC20 6.375%06/20/2027 OD 06101/ 01-Oct-1999 -28,619.29 PD -612.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,006.64 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Oct-1999 28,006.64 36225CC20 6.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nw-/999 10.07.53 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE M PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT! SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST! TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -77,449.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Oct-1999 77,449.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Oct-1999 -77,534.21 PD -94.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,205.68 FNMA POOL80252703 01-Oct-1999 3,205.68 31371 HU49 6.500%09/012006 DD 09101/ 01-0U-1999 -3,139.06 PD 66.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,205.68 FNMA POOL80252703 01.Oc1.1999 3,205.68 31371HU48 6.500%09/012006 DD 08/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00 FC 25.Oc1-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-00-1999 6,24822 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Oc1-1999 -6,248.22 PD 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 I5-Oct-1999 6,248.22 3935052Y7 6290%10/152013 DO 0826/9 15.Oct-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Oct-1999 11,409.40 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/199 15.0ct-1999 -11,408.40 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15.Oc1.1999 11,408.40 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/15/9 15.Oct-1999 0.00 FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00 MATURITIES 09-Nov.1999 10.07.55 EcecWhrc Workberch Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11800,000.00 IBM DISC 04-Oct-1999 1,7%,542.00 44922BX45 10/04/1999 04-Oa-1999 -1,796,542.00 MT 04-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 04-Oct-1999 13,944,560.00 74271SX42 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 -13,944,560.00 MT 04-0ct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Oct-1999 899,061.25 313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 899,061.25 MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,000.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 05-Oct-1999 12,976,946.66 36959JX57 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 42,976,946.66 MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 05-Oct-1999 1,199,584.00 42824KX55 10/05/1999 05-On-1999 -1.198,584.00 MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-0ct-1999 894,435.00 36959JX65 10/06/1999 06-Oct-1999 -894,435.00 MT 06-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 08-OU-1999 299,650.00 31358SMSI MAT 10/09/1999 08-Oct-1999 -299,650.00 MT 08-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Now1999 10:07:55 Ececurin Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 12-Oct-1999 299,834.67 313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 12-0ct-1999 -299,934.67 MT 12-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 19.Od-1999 499,712.78 313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 19.0d-1999 -499.712.78 MT 19.0d-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 IBM DISC 21.Oct-1999 996,297.00 44922BXMS 10/21/1999 21-Oct-1999 -896,297.00 MT 21.0d-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 22-Oct-1999 5.191.366.67 313384NG0 MAT 1022119" 22-Oc1-1999 -5,181,366.67 MT 22.0d-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 25-Ou-1999 399,497.78 313588NK7 MAT 1025/99 25-0d-1999 -398,497.78 MT 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-0d-1999 6,969,200.00 02581SXT3 1027/1999 27-Od-1999 -6,969,200.00 MT 27-Od-1999 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 15.Oct-1999 500,000.00 171205AT4 13.250%10/15/1999 15-Oct-1999 -529,010.00 MT IS-Oct-1999 .29,010.00 09-Noo-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 20-Oct-1999 900,000.00 31808CBQ4 6.190%1020/1999 DD 102M 20-Oct-1999 -901,167.30 MT 20-Oct-1999 -1,167.30 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-Oct-1999 0.04 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-Oct-1999 0.50 996087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 01-Oct-1999 79,697.50 59018SXP4 6.375%10/01/2001 DO 10/03/9 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-0ct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 01-Ott-1999 28,125.00 37042M702 6.250%011112000 DO 01/1 IN 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oct-1999 442.38 996085247 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-0ct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-0cb1999 37,719.64 996095247 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 01-0c1-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 IBM DISC 04-0ct-1999 3,458.00 44922BX45 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 04-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 04-Oct-1999 55,440.00 74271SX42 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 04-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Oct-1999 1,939.75 313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 05-Oct-1999 23,053.34 36959JX57 10/05/1999 05-Oc1-1999 0.00 IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 05-Oct-1999 1,416.00 42824KX55 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-Oct-1999 5,565.00 36959JX65 10/06/1999 06-OM-1999 0.00 IT 06-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Now 1999 1207.55 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Oa-1999 175,500.00 638581DE6 5.850%04/07/2000 DD 04/07/9 07-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 07-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 08-Oct-1999 350.00 31358SMSI MAT 10/08/1999 08-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 08-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 12-Oct-1999 165.33 313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 12-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 12-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 15-00-1999 33,125.00 171205AT4 13.250°A 10/15/1999 15-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 15-0n-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-00-1999 67,500.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 IS-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN BTR 00299 15-Oct-1999 55,813.32 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 15-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 15-0M-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 15-Oct-1999 55,325.95 3128DDQ55 7.000'/o 02/012003 DD 02/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT I5-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nov-1999 10:07.55 Executive Workbench Q F ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,618.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15.Oct-1999 3.490.90 3133T02135 5.900%06/15/2017 01.Od-1999 0.00 IT IS-Oct-1999 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-0n-1999 2,597.28 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 08/2619 15.Oc1-1999 0.00 IT 15-OU-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C IS-0ct-1999 519.20 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/15/9 15-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 15-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15.Oc1-1999 22.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Sep-1999 0.00 IT 15.Oc1-I999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15.Oct-1999 16,959.18 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Sep-1999 0.00 IT 15.0U-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 18-Ott-1999 4,321.88 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DD 05/181 18-Ou-1999 0.00 IT I8-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,697.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 I84)c1.1999 11,697.01 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/0119 01.Oct-1999 0.00 IT 18-Oc1-1999 0.00 094Now1999 10:07:55 Eeemtiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGES 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 287.22 313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 19-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 8TR006 20-Oct-1999 18,783.35 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 20-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 20-Oa-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,017.10 GNMA It POOL#0080023 20.Oa-1999 8,578.34 36225CAZ9 6.125%12/20/2026 DO 12/01/ 01-Ott-1999 0.00 IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 20-Oct-1999 5,416.25 31808CBQ4 6.190%10/20/1999 DO 10/20/9 20-Oa-1999 0.00 IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,006.64 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 20-Oct-1999 11,825.75 36225CC20 6.375%0620/2027 DO 06/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Oct-1999 3,70100 44922BXM5 10/21/1999 21-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 21-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 22-Oct-1999 18,633.33 313384NGO MAT 1022/1999 22-Ga-1999 0.00 IT 22-Oct-1999 0.00 09-,V o-1999 10:07.55 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25�Oct-1999 10,933.33 3133TDPV2 6.5009's09/252018 25-S«1999 0.00 IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 25-Oct-1999 1,502.22 313598NKI MAT 1025/99 25-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.205.68 FNMA POOLN0252703 25-Oct-1999 5,395.40 31371HU48 6.5001/609/012006DD08/OI/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-Oct-1999 30,900.00 02581SXT3 1027/1999 27-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 27-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 8TR 00246 28.Oct-1999 42,712.92 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/ 28-Oct-1999 0.00 IT 28-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM PUS IN'I AD3 29-Oct-1999 -128.50 990000P34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 29-Oc1-1999 0.00 CW 29-Oct-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-00-1999 25,500.00 9128272M3 3.375%0111512007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 29-Oct-1999 0.00 09-Nm-1999 10:07:55 &x ,wl. Wark&en h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST7 TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Oct-1999 17,600.D0 9128273A8 3.623%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 0.00 CD 29-Oct-1999 0.00 09-NowI999 10:07.55 aze wsce Workbench FAHR COMMITTEE Mee8n913 a To ea.ofDlr. 11/10/98 12/17/99 AGENDA REPORT Rm Number 1p N11e'bef FMR99-83 14fd) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 1999-00 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 1999. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended September 30, 1999. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District through the first quarter of the 1999-00 fiscal year. Contained within the First Quarter Financial Report and Operational Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1999-00 Approved Budget and Strategic Goals Workplan. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 27.29 percent, or$12,009,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been expended. Net costs have increased 14.94 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily due to the unexpected cost of the Huntington Beach Closure totaling $750,800. Excluding the Huntington Beach Closure cost, net joint operating expenses would be at 25.6 percent of budget. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1999 is $544.26 based on flows of 23,236.07 million gallons. This is $62.02, or 12.9 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due in part to expenditures being slightly high at 27.29 percent, but mostly due to the shortfall in flows which are 4.06 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. Excluding the Huntington Beach Closure cost would reduce the cost per million gallons to $510.23, or 5.8 percent above budget. H My EbHpeM+WaN�qMa flepA\t Wd BmN�QaMa flepWlf I Whrn 1 (GI.Ox flmW vum Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS 1. 1999-00 Financial and Operational Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1999 µ`ry Ap Rg 11M BW Aqe eN h1110]JM1m 1y0 di RwuE. eaBve Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE MeebngDMe ToXElds. 11110/99 11/17/99 AGENDA REPORT I"1%lumWr IMMNumbe FAHR99-85 14(eI Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Originator: Lisa Tomko, Manager, Human Resources SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-22, Amending Policies Numbers B30.00, C10.00, C20.00, C30.00, C150.00, D50.00, D60.00, D90.00 and F80.00 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Adding Policies Numbers C20.10 and C170.00 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 98-33; Ratifying any Additional Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33; and Ratifying that All Future Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be Made by Resolution re Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for Classification, Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, Policies and Procedures Governing District Employment. SUMMARY Human Resources policies and procedures are amended two times each calendar year. The attached policies are routine updates to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Hw.n mWew, Aqw RepeMH Memm W.a•Rq 1110. 14(e)Ex Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION a Policy Number From To Reason And Subject For Change C10.00-Classifications,Positions, Policy changed to reflect Revision of 'Exhibit A- Changes per the SPMT Salary Ranges and Wages Pay for Performance Salary Ranges'and Negobatlons. Ment Matrix for Exempt clarification of pay for Employees. performance per the SPLIT Negotiations. C20.00-Compensation Polkyremainsthe Change in wording to Clarification of salary fame. Sections 5.6.3.2 and adjustments for 5.6.4.3 probationary employees. C30.00-Appraisal of Performance 4.3 Professional, 4.3 Professional, Remove the words*or Supervisory, Supervisory,Management mind bonus. Management and EMT and EMT employees will employees will receive a receive a performance performance appraisal appraisal prior to any Prior to any salary salary adjustment, adjustment or merit bonus. D60.00-Insurance Polley Policy remains the Additional language under To clarify that the District same. 5.5 Dental and 6.1 provides Insurance for 0s Exceptions to exclude non employees only and does employees. not include Independent contractors. D60.00-Benefits Option Plan(BOP) 5.1 Professional Professional employees Provision negotiated In the employees will receive will receive$1,000 SPMT contract. 9750 annually. annually. Clarity the past practice for 6.1 Add language probationary employees. regarding employees on probation. 090-00-Tultion Reknbursement Tuition Assistance Tuition Reimbursement Replaces Tuillon Pr ram Program Assistanu Polio F90.00-Workplace Violence and Workplace Violence Workplace Violence and Include the Mou language Weapons Polley Pdl, y. Weapons Policy. regarding weapons I i the policy. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Policy C10.00 Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages 2. Policy C20.00 Compensation 3. Policy C30.00 Appraisal of Performance 4. Policy D50.00 Insurance 5. Policy D60.00 Benefits Option Plan 6. Policy D90.00 Tuition Reimbursement Program 7. Policy F80.00 Workplace Violence and Weapons Policy HM.y.EUYawWlaoaN AawW RepoftnM anN AWda Ri xWl 10Bexn Net kov Page 2 Orange County Policy Number: C10.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17,1999 Subject: CLASSIFICATIONS, Supersedes: December 9, 1998 POSITIONS, SALARY RANGES AND WAGES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the Districts'compensation programs. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All Districts'employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Classifications are groups of positions, regardless of location,which are alike enough in duties and responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title, to be given the same pay scale under similar conditions,and to require substantially the same qualifications. Salary Ranges are the range of pay rates,from minimum to maximum, set for a pay grade or class. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The Districts'Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that aNewssistriets management employees to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and personal merit. Every position is assigned to a salary grade based upon the duties and responsibilities of that position and the comparative market value of that job function. Comparisons are most generally made with organizations of similar size and engaged in similar occupational pursuits within the geographic area of potential recruitment. The basic salary ranges are set forth on Exhibit A. 4.2 Wage nA' to f...employees in!he Co.... , e Management Managem..nPFAfPAAiAAA1 AFOUPS Feseive annual wage aoustments. The amount ef the wage ei�ined by the Boards and 6 distftuted equally Is all least meet expsetal eAs to keep employees at MaFkal. Page 4.3 Employees are awarded merit increases based upon their performance,as determined by the performance evaluation program, and the position of their salary within the pay range. The Merit Matrix is the tool used to determine the actual amount of merit Increase. In addition, employees in the Supervisory and Professional Group who at least meet expectations receive annual Cost of Living Adjustments(COLA)to keep employees'salaries at market.The amount of the COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI,All-Urban Consumers-LA, Riverside,Orange County)for the month of May and is distributed as a base- building increase. 4.4 Employees in the Executive Management and Management Groups are awarded merit increases based upon their performance,as determined by the performance evaluation program,and the position of their salary relative to the external market. External market rates are determined through the use of salary surveys.The merit increase may be distributed as base building or non-base building. 4.5 The General Manager is authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy budgeted positions and to exercise supervision over all persons in accordance with the provisions of this policy and to terminate,for cause,the employment of any regular full time employee employed under these provisions. All other employees,e.g.,probationary, part-time,and limited term/temporary and contract may be terminated at the Districts'sole discretion. 4.6 The General Manager is also authorized to employ Executive Management employees on an"at-will"basis. Such status shall be memorialized by a written agreement signed by the General Manager and the Executive Manager, acknowledging that the Executive Manager shall serve at the pleasure of the General Manager. Any Executive Management employee so employed on the date of adoption of this policy,who has not signed an"at-will"agreement may voluntarily elect to do so, but may not be required to do so. 4.7 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this policy or any prior Board action,the General Manager is authorized to periodically adjust the rate of compensation of Executive Management employees who have signed"at-will"agreements so long as no adjustment exceeds the compensation permitted by the applicable salary range established by the Joint Boards of Directors. 4.8 Employees who believe their position is not property classified may request e classification study of their position through their Department Head. Classification studies shall only be conducted twice a year in November and May. 4.8.1 Classification study requests should be submitted to Human Resources no later than October I&for the November cycle and no later than April 1 e for the May cycle. 4.8.2 All classification study findings regarding existing classifications are subject to approval by the General Manager;findings recommending new job classification titles or the reclassification of an existing classification to a different pay range are subject to approval by the Districts'Boards of Directors. Page 2 4.9 The D striate aFe IfeveMed by!he aFevs sAs of lhA FAHAFal Fair LaleAF Stan daPds As!, "FLSA", and have, in aGGGFdamse with I,after study and evalual on of lhe suiies an w thin the Exe-utive Management, Management, Supervisory and Profess anal An the PF8V 6 ORS at the rl=SA-. 4.10 The District shall provide an investment incentive salary to the employees within the classifications and in the amounts, as set forth in Section 4.8.1,which amounts are based on a percentage of salary equal to the amount previously paid to designated employees pursuant to District Policy No.C150.00, Section 7.1, effective October 22, 1997, and repealed April 22, 1998. 4.10.1 The percentage of base salary amounts are as follows: Executive management—6%(up to a maximum IRS amount) Division management and supervisor—4% Professional and confidential—3% 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Employees on the Five-Step Pay Plan 5.1.1 New Employees. Employees who successfully complete their Initial Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%)effective on the first day of the pay period following completion of the Initial Probationary Period. The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is established on the first day of a pay period following 26 weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of probation. 5.1.2 Annual Merit Increase. Employees who are not at the top of the salary range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step(5.59/6)on their Salary Review date, provided their performance fully meets expectations. 5.1.3 Promotional Increase. Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional increase of 5.5%,or to the base of the new range, whichever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an employee has not successfully completed their Promotional Probationary Period on their Salary Review date,any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. 5.2 Executive Management, Management,Supervisory and Professional Group Employees 5.2.1 New Employees. Employees who are hired into Executive Management, Management, Supervisory and Professional Group positions with "exempt"salary ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range unless their level of background,expertise or prior earnings result in a requirement for a salary greaterthan the minimum.The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised, if any. Page 3 5.2.1.1 Employees in"exempt range classifications serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period. Employees who successfully conclude their probation are eligible for a salary adjustment the subsequent July in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program established by separate action of the Boards of Directors as amended from time to time. 5.2.2 Annual Management Performance Review Procram. An annual performance review is completed for all employees in"exempt" range classifications in accordance with the provisions of the performance evaluation Program. Performance based salary adjustments occur on the first day of the first pay period in July,and may will be prorated based upon the date of hire or promotion, If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the following July and will be prorated based on date of hire or promotion. 5.2.3 Promotional Increases. Employees in"exempt"range classifications who earn promotions to a new"exempt" range classification will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings,and in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised.The new salary will normally represent an increase of at least 5.5 percent. Employees in"exempt"range classifications are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of the Promotional Probationary Period. ff the employee's probaton period has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until suel;time as PFOW OR is SUGG866fUlly seasladed until the following July and will be prorated based on date of promotion. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Sections 5.2.1,5.2.2 and 5.2.3 do not apply to"at-will' Executive Management Employees. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Exhibit A 8.2 Fair Labor Standards Act Page 4 ATTACHMENT "A" m Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employed Group Operations and Maintenance(501( Pey Bane minimum Maximum Classifications IFLSA Statue 2015 44,571 55.504 Lead Electrical Technician Non-Exempt 2015 44,571 55.504 Lead Instrumentation Technician Non-Exempt 2014 42,207 52,549 Electrical Technician ll Non-Exempt 2014 42.207 52,549 Instrumentation Technician 11 Non-Exempt 2013 40.775 50,776 Lead Mechanic Non-Exampt 2013 40.775 50.776 Pump Power Operator Non-Exempt 2013 40,775 50,776 Senior Plant Operator Non-Exempt 2012 41.812 52.060 Lead Collection Facilities Woduu Nan-Exempt 2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt 2012 41,812 52,060 Machinist Non-Exempt 2011 39.304 48,949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt 2011 39,304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt 2010 39,040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt 2009 37.979 47,285 Builder Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47,285 Electrical Technician l Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47.285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt 2008 37.737 46,973 Plant Operator Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42,969 Electrical Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42.969 Instrumentation Maintenance Worker Non-Exampt 2007 34.505 42.969 Painter Non-Exempt 2007 34.605 42,969 Senior Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Nan-Exempt 2006 33,590 41.812 Mechanic Non-Exempt 2005 31,348 39.040 Collection Facilities Worker 11 Non-Exempt 2005 31,348 39,040 Mainumance Worker Non-Exempt 2004 30,938 38.509 Operator In Training Non-Exempt 2003 29,875 37.207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt 2002 29,490 36.700 Control Center Clark Nan-Exampl 2001 24,184 30.093 Cdlection Facilities Worker I Nan-Exempt 2000 22.882 28,502 Helper Nan-Exempt rer Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Administrative and Clerical Exhibit A Pay _ Pan a Minimum Maximum Classllicallons PLSA Status 1019 44,660 55,628 Infanaation Services Technician III Non-Exempt 1017 41,714 51.940 Financial Technician Non Exempt 1015 40,806 50.540 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt 1013 38.436 47,840 Senior Storeskeeper Non-Exempt 1012 38,933 48,476 Adminlstralive Assistant Non-Exempt 1011 37,906 47,189 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt 1011 37,906 47.189 Information Services Technician ll Non-Exempt 1008 34,382 42,800 Information Services Technician l Non-Exempt 1007 33,444 41,644 Secretary Non-Exempt 1004 31,878 39,601 Senior Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt 1004 31,878 39,691 Senior Office Aide Nan-Exempt 1003 31,660 39,424 Storeskeeper Non-Exempt 1002 29,370 36,556 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt 1002 29,370 36,556 Office Me Non-Exempt 1002 29,370 36,556 Office Specialist Non-Exempt 1001 26,308 32,770 Office Technician Non Exempt 904 14,468 30,164 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt 903 14,468 24,812 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt m Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Confidential Pay Range Mlnlmum Mexlmum Classllleetlone FLSA Sfatua 1027 42.551 52.978 Executive Assistant ll No.-Exempt 1012 38,933 48,476 Executive Assistant l Non-Exempt 1012 38,933 48,476 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt ac Orange County Sanitation Dlsfrlct Classifications By Employee Group Executive Management Pey, Ran a Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Statue E27 $154.596 $154.596 General Manager Exempt E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt E19 S87,180 $139.980 Director of Engineering Exempt E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Operations B Maintenance Exempt E19 $87.180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of Technical Services Exempt E18 S85,992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt Ei8 S85,992 $139,464 Director of Information Technology Exempt E17 $75.876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Directorol Communications Exempt Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Engineering Pay Bane Minimum Maximum Classifications RSA Status 1025 49,866 62A90 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt 1023 47,526 59,174 Engineering Associate Non-Exampt 102D 45,621 56,766 Canstruction Inspector Non-Exempt 1015 40,606 5Q540 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt 1009 36,893 45.935 Engineering Aide 11 Nan-Exempt 1006 33,228 41,355 Engineering Aide I Nun-Exempt Orange County Sensation District Classifications By Employee Group Management Pry Rene Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA States E16 $77,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt E16 M.688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt E16 ST/1668 $109,812 Emtronmental Compliance&Monitoring Manager Exempt E16 $77,688 $109,812 Laboratory Manager Exempt E16 $77,688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt E15 573,956 $104.616 Controller Exempt E15 $73,956 $104,616 Financial Manager Exempt E15 $73,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt E15 $73,956 $104.616 Contracts&Purchasing Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94.932 SafetWEmergency Response Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Maintenance Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Human Resources Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Operations Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technology Manager Exempt nnmee Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Professional I � I flan Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status E14 $70.380 $99,600 Chief Scientist Exempt E13 $67.128 $94.932 Assistant to Me General Manager Exempt E13 $97.128 $94,932 Senior Engineer Exempt E12 M948 $90.468 Senior Scientist Exempt E12 $63,948 $90.468 Senior Regulatory Specielud Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Engineer Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt E10 557,852 $81,948 Secretary to the Board of Directors Exempt E9 $55,212 $78.166 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 555212 $78.156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Project Specialist Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt E9 $55,212 578,156 Scientist Exempt E9 $55212 MASS Principal A=untant Exempt E9 $56212 $MISS Principal Flnandal Analyst Exempt E9 $55212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt ES 552,500 $74,292 Associate Engineer III Exempt E8 552,500 $74,292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt E8 552,500 $74,292 Safety$Emergency Response Specialist Exempt E7 M.064 $70.848 Programmer Analyst Exempt E7 $60.064 $70,848 Computer Hardware Specialist Non-Exempt E7 550,064 570,1t48 Telecommunications Specialist Non-Exempt E7 550,064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt E7 $50.064 $70.848 Contracts Administrator Exempt E6 547,640 $67.392 Principal Laboratory 8 Research Analyst Exempt Ell 547,640 $67.392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt E5 545.396 $64.212 Associate Engineer ll Exempt E5 545.396 $64.212 Senior Accountant Exempt ES 545.396 $64.212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt E5 $45.396 564,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt ES 545,396 $64,212 Senior Environmental Specialist Exempt E4 $43.248 $61,236 Safely Reprasentaave Exempt E4 $43.248 $61.236 Programmer Exempt E4 $43.248 $61.236 Senior Buyer Exempt E3 $41.136 $58.260 Associate Engineer l Exempt E2 539.252 $55,488 Contracts Specialist Exempt El $37.284 $52.9D8 Accountant Exempt El $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt E1 $37284 552,90I Financial Analyst Exempt E1 $37,284 $52.908 Management Analyst Exempt rm Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Supervlsory Pey Ben a Minimum Maximum Classification FLEA SfaNa E14 $70,380 $99.600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt E13 $67,128 $94.932 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt E12 $63,948 $90.468 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt Ell 960.82E $86.064 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt Ell $6g628 $86.064 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt Ell 661 $66.064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86.064 Contracts$Purchasing Supervisor Exempt E9 $55,212 $78.156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt E9 $65,212 $78,156 Operations Supervisor Exempt E9 $55,212 $78,156 Source Control Supevsor Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,166 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt rm Orange County Sanitation District Clauglwtlons By Employee Group Technical Services pay LRenge Minimum Maximum CbulOeations FLSA Sbtus 1016 43,476 54,134 Environmental Specialist ll Non-Exempt 1016 43,476 54,134 Source Control Inspector ll Non-Exempt 1016 43,476 54,130 Senior Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt 1010 37,134 46,249 Environmental Specialist l No Exempt 1010 37,134 46,249 Laboratory Analyst Nor1-Exempt 1010 37.134 46.249 Source Control Inspector I Non-Exempt 1005 32,552 40,533 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group "Non-Regular"Part Time Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Btatus g05 13,720 33,280 Intern Non-Exampt Orange County Policy Number: C20.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17, 1999 Subject: COMPENSATION Supersedes: October 22, 1997 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish and maintain uniform compensation standards for all Districts'employees. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all Districts'employees, as specified herein. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the policy of the Districts to apply uniform compensation standards.The Districts'Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows Districts' management to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and personal merit. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Exempt Employees 5.1.1 Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed. 5.2 Non-exempt Employees 5.2.1 Non-exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed. Page 1 5.3 New Employees 5.3.1 New employees in classifications within employee bargaining units other than the Professional, Supervisory, Executive Management and Management Groups who successfully complete their Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment as regular employees,are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%). 5.3.1.1 This adjustment is effective on the first day of the pay period that follows the date of completion of the Probationary Period (normally 26 weeks).The salary review date for subsequent annual reviews is the first day of the first pay period following 26 weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of probation. 5.3.1.2 The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is the first day of that pay period following the date when probation was successfully completed. 5.4 Reviews 5.4.1 An employee in a group other than Professional,Supervisory and Executive Management and Management who is not at the top of the salary range for their position is eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step(5.50/6)on their Salary Review date, provided their performance satisfactorily meets expectations. 5.4.1.1 Annual performance reviews shall be completed on a fomx provided by the Director of Human Resources. 5.5 Promotions 5.5.1 An employee who eams a promotion is entitled to a promotional increase of at least 5.5%, or to the base of the new range,which ever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. 5.5.1.1 If an employee has not successfully completed the promotional probationary period on their salary review date,any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. 5.5.1.2 A new salary review date is established for any promotion to a classification not in the Professional,Supervisory, Executive Management and Management Group. 5.6 E-Range Classifications 5.6.1 An employee hired into Professional, Supervisory, Executive Management and Management Group positions with"exempt"salary ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range unless their level of background,expertise or prior earnings indicates a need for a salary greater than the minimum. Page 2 5.6.1.1 The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider the relationship of the employee's proposed salary to that of other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised,it any. 5.6.2 Except for"at-wilr Executive Management employees,employees in "exempt"range classifications serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period unless otherwise provided in an individual, written employment agreement. 5.6.2.1 An employee who successfully completes probation is eligible for a salary adjustment according to the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program which is in force at the time of the review. 5.6.3 An annual performance review is completed for all employees in "exempt" range classifications according to the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program. 5.6.3.1 Performance-based salary adjustments for these employees occur on the first day of the first pay period in July. 5.6.3.2 Such adjustmepAs may be PFBrated based an!he dale 8f hiFe, PFGMOti8R, GF last salary ssFPAAA in those +n,t,R,,q where the If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the following July and will be prorated based on date of hire or promotion. 5.6.4 An employee in"exempt" range classifications who is promoted to a new "exempt"range classification will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings. 5.6.4.1 The promoted employee's salary should be in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised. 5.6.4.2 The new salary will normally represent an increase of least 5.5 percent, slaseHisatien. 5.6.4.3 If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the following July and will be prorated based on date of promotion. 5.6.4.4 This section does not apply to"at-will"Executive Management employees. Page 3 1 5.7 Y-Rating 5.7.1 If the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a lower paid classification as a result of a classification study,the salary of the of the employee in that position shall remain unchanged(Y-rated) according to the following table: Years of Semi ea Term of If- 0-3 One Year 4-5 Two Years 6- 10 Three Years 11 -20 Four Years 21 or More Five Years 5.7.2 The Y-rate remains in effect until the salary range for the new classification equals or exceeds the employee's Y-rated salary,or until the term of the Y-rate expires. 5.7.2.1 If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls within the range of the new classification,the employee shall be placed on the step of the new range nearest but not more than the Y-rated salary. 5.7.2.2 Employees become eligible for merit increases and range adjustments when the Y-rate is no longer in effect. 5.7.2.3 An employee who requests a voluntary reduction is not entitled to a Y-rate. 5.7.2.4 This section does not apply to"at-will" Executive Management employees. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 The General Manager is authorized to offer up to three(3) weeks of annual paid vacation to any prospective Executive Management employee if, in the judgment of the General Manager, such offer is necessary to attract the most qualified candidate. 6.1.1 The General Manager shall annually report all such appointments to the Board Subcommittee having responsibility for personnel matters. 6.1.2 Salary offers beyond the midpoint of a range require prior approval by the General Manager. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 6.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS (Attach salary range exhibits when available) Page 4 Orange County Policy Number: C30.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17, 1999 Subject: APPRAISAL OF Supersedes: October 22, 1997 PERFORMANCE Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for the appraisal of employee performance. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 1.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational unit. 2.0 DEFINITIONS 3.0 POLICY 3.1 It is the Districts'policy and the Districts' management philosophy that establishing an effective level of communication that offers consistent and continuing feedback on performance expectations and achievements will provide an environment in which our employees can perform to the best of their abilities. A performance appraisal program has been developed to provide a structure that will support the accomplishment of that goal. Important principles of the program include: 3.1.1 The Districts'overall mission is enhanced by establishing a connection between that mission and individual employees' responsibilities and objectives. 3.1.2 Recognizing employee strengths and identifying areas that may represent opportunities for improvement will affect current performance as well as enhance career potential. 3.1.3 Every individual has primary responsibility for their own performance and development. 3.1.4 The key role of the supervisor is to support an employee's efforts to maximize their own contribution and potential. Page 1 4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 New employees will receive a performance appraisal at the close of their initial probationary period to determine their suitability for continued employment with the Districts. An evaluation should also occur midway through the probationary period to ensure that performance expectations have been properly communicated and established. This will also offer an opportunity for both the employee and the supervisor to more effectively evaluate the desirability of continuing the employment relationship. 4.2 Employees who earn promotions should similarly receive a performance appraisal at the conclusion of the promotional probationary period. 4.3 An annual performance appraisal will be completed with each employee prior to their anniversary date. Professional,Supervisory, Management and Executive Management employees will receive a performance appraisal prior to any salary adjustment er-meAR4eans. 5.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 6.1 Supervisors and managers will be notified by the Human Resources Department of all evaluations that must be completed at least 45 days in advance of the due dale. 7.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 2 Orange County Policy Number: D50.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999 Subject: INSURANCE Supersedes: May 13, 1998 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's insurance benefits program. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District shall provide medical-health insurance coverage through both health maintenance organizations and an indemnity type group health plan, life insurance, and disability insurance for the benefit of full-time employees. 4.2 All insurance coverage shall become effective on the first day of the month following one full month of employment.An open enrollment period shall be held annually in the month of June. 5.0 PLANS-PROGRAMS 5.1 Medical. The District shall contribute 100%of employee only premiums for the medical health plans and shall contribute 80%of the employee+1 dependent and full family premiums. Any change in insurance rates shall be shared equally in same ratio as premiums are currently paid by the District and employees. Before the renewal of any District's sponsored health insurance plan,the parties agree to meet and confer as to the plan. 5.1.1 Any change In Insurance rates caused by a carrier after 11-25-96 are subject to the applicable provisions of the various Memoranda of Understanding approved by the Boards of Directors. Page 1 5.2 Life. The District provides term life Insurance coverage for most employees. The District shall pay the full premium for term life insurance as established for each employee covered under a Memorandum of Understanding or as otherwise agreed upon. 5.3 Short Term Disabilitv. The District shall provide a non-work related, short-term disability indemnity plan that pays up to a maximum of$336 per week for up to 26 weeks following a fourteen calendar day waiting period. Employees may request to receive prorated sick leave,personal leave or vacation pay to supplement their short term disability payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay. 5.4 Long-Tenn Disabilitv. The District offers,at the employee's expense, a non-work related, long-term disability indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of the employee's rate of pay in effect at the time of such disability, not to exceed$5,000 per month,following a 90-day wailing period of continuous disability. The District provides this coverage at the District's expense after five years of employment. 5.5 Dental. The District provides a dental plan for regular,full-time employees and their eligible dependents at no cost for employee-only coverage and$9.00 per month for full family coverage. employee only and$75 54 fa.full fam Di a 6 the nt r 5.5 Visi n. The District shall provide a vision insurance plan for regular,full-time employees and their eligible dependents. 5.6 Retirino Employees. The District shall pay,for employees hired prior to July 1, 1988,two and one-half months'premium for each year of continuous service of a retiring employee towards the premium costs of coverage for the employee and eligible dependents under the District's medical plan. 5.6.1 The District shall enter into an agreement with the Orange County Employee Retirement System (OCERS)to implement the retiree medical health premium offset program established by the County of Orange wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by$10 per month for every year of service up to a maximum of 25 years or$250 per month. 5.7 Workers Compensation Insurance. The District's Workers Compensation program is self-funded and administered by a third party administrator. Workers' Compensation insurance provides coverage for injuries arising out of employment with the District and occurring in the course of employment. 5.8 Reimbursement Account. Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code permits employees to use pretax dollars to pay for their portion of the cost of benefits under the plan through salary redirection arrangements.The available options are summarized below. For complete information regarding Flexible Spending Accounts employees must refer to the plan booklet available in the Human Resources Department. Participation in this Program does not affect the District's contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement System. The amount deducted shall then be repaid to the employee through the District's provided Reimbursement Program. Page 2 5.8.1 Group Insurance Premium.Group insurance premiums that are paid by salary redirection can be made on a pretax basis. 5.8.2 Medical Care Reimbursement Account.The purpose of this account is to provide a method through which an employee can accumulate pretax funds in a Medical Care Reimbursement Account for the purposes of reimbursing the employee for payment of health care costs not otherwise covered by the health and medical insurance. 5.8.3 Dependent Care Assistance Account.The purpose of this account is to provide a method through which an employee can accumulate pretax funds in a Dependent Care Assistance Account for the purposes of reimbursing the employee for child care expenses or day care for a disabled dependent. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Contract workers are not entitled to and are ineligible to join or participate in any benefit plans offered to those individuals listed on OCSD's payroll as regular employees. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 No combination of disability or sick leave pay shall result in more than an employee's regular rate of pay. Employees may not receive short-term and long- term disability benefits at the same time. An employee who is otherwise not eligible for District paid long-term disability may purchase such coverage at their own expense. 7.2 In the event the District adds additional optional insurance plans, the District's share of the premium shall be the same as for existing plans as set forth above. In the event the District changes underwriters for existing insurance plans,the District's share of the premium shall be the same as for existing insurance plans as set forth above. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 3 Orange County Policy Number: D60.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999 Subject: BENEFITS OPTION PLAN Supersedes: October 22, 1997 (BOP) Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for administering the Benefits Option Plans(BOP). 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management Groups. 3.0 DEFINITIONS The Benefits Option Plan is a provision in the District's policies that provides employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups with supplemental income that can be used for a variety of purposes as specified herein. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to allow employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups to participate in the BOP in accordance with this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management group who have successfully completed their probationary period are entitled to participate in the BOP. Under the provisions of the BOP, Professional employees will receive$750$1,000 annually, and Supervisors, Management and Executive Management employees will receive$1250 annually to offset the cost of professional licenses,memberships,subscriptions,tuition reimbursement and medical expenses-The Benefits Option Plan will be distributed semi-annually in January and July of each year. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Employees who are within their initial six-month probationary period are not eligible for BOP. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Policy Number: D90.00 b Orange County Effective Date: October 22, 1997 Sanitation District ^Mf XV` Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes:Tuition Assistance PROGRAM Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE This program is designed to encourage self-development of District employees by providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational courses at accredited colleges, universities,or other approved institutions provided that such courses are primarily for the purpose of: • Increasing capabilities in their present positions within the District • Preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to advance within the District • Updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED This policy applies to all District's regular,full-time employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualifying Employees: regular,full-time employees who have completed their initial probationary period. 3.2 Regular Full-time Employees:qualifying employees who regularly work an 80- hour, biweekly pay period. 3.3 Tuition Reimbursement: a reimbursement program of eligible expense for qualifying employees who attend, on their own time, District-approved courses at accredited colleges, universities,or other approved institutions of the employees' choosing. 4.0 POLICY The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete education courses that serve the mission and goals of the District at accredited institutions in compliance with Section 1.0*PURPOSE,"provided that the reimbursement is within the individual maximum and overall limits of the authorized tuition reimbursement budget. 5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Employees can be reimbursed for the following: • Specific,job-related associate, baccalaureate, and graduate degree programs Page 1 • Specific,job-related courses through accredited colleges or universities • Specific,job-related courses offered through an approved institution of study 5.2 When an employee has completed each pre-approved course with a grade of "C"or better for undergraduate or"B"or better for graduate work, the District will reimburse the employee the cost of tuition, books,and required fees not to exceed$5,250 per calendar year. Examples of eligible and ineligible expenses are: Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses • Tuition • Application fees • Registration fees • Material fees • Laboratory fees • Travel • Parking fees • Optional student fees • Required textbook costs • Doctoral dissertation fees • Health fees • Masters thesis fees 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Pre-Approval Process 6.1.1 Employee seeking tuition reimbursement: 6.1.1.1 Prior to the start of a course or degree program,submits to the Education and Training Division for the semester or quarter, a Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval Application with Sections 1,2 and 3(Manager's Review and Pre-Approval)completed. Note: Although not required, it m advisable to submit the completed application prior to registering for the course or program so that approval can be determined before the employee incurs any expenses. 6.1.1.2 If seeking pre-approval for courses in a degree program,submit a list of approved courses prepared by the school and signed by the employee's advisor at the beginning of the program. Submit this list with the initial Tuition Reimbursement Pre- Approval Application. 6.1.2 The Education and Training Division Manager: 6.1.2.1 Reviews the Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval Application. 6.1.2.2 If incomplete, returns the application to the employee with a Status form indicating the date that the employee must correct and return the application to the Education and Training Division. 6.1.2.3 If approved,signs the Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval Application and forwards a copy of the application and a Tuition Reimbursement Application to the employee. 6.1.2.4 If the application is not approved, returns the application to the employee with a Status form indicating the reason(s)for non-approval. Page 2 6.2 Reimbursement Process 6.2.1 Within 60 calendar days following the end of the course(s),the employee submits the Tuition Reimbursement Application with Section 1 completed to the Education and Training Division with the following documents attached: • Official record of final grade • Receipts for tuition and eligible fees paid • Receipts for books 6.2.2 The Education and Training Division Manager. 6.2.2.1 Reviews the Tuition Reimbursement Application and attached documentation. 6.2.2.2 If Incomplete, returns the application to the employee with a Status form indicating the date that the employee must correct and return the application to the Education and Training Division. 6.2.2.3 If approved,signs the application and forwards the approved application to the Accounting Division and a copy to the employee indicating reimbursement status. 6.2.2.4 If the application is not approved, returns the application to the employee with a Status forth Indicating the reason(s)for non-approval. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made. 7.2 Employees will not be reimbursed for tuition costs covered under Veterans Administration Programs or other government sponsored programs. 7.3 Reimbursement may be authorized whenever the employee's manager and Education and Training Division Manager determine that there is substantial benefit to be derived by the District when an employee takes a course or program that does not meet the requirements of Section 6.1,for example, courses for impacted or transitional employees and/or non-credit courses. 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 An employee who receives payments for formal course work through the Tuition Reimbursement Program will be required to reimburse the District 9 the employee voluntarily leaves the District's employment within two years of completing the course work. The General Manager, under unusual circumstances or on an individual basis, may waive the repayment requirement. 8.2 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee meets the criteria specified in this policy. Page 3 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended. ` 9.2 Sections 127 and 132J8 of the Internal Revenue Code. raged Orange County Policy Number: F80.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999 Subject: WORKPLACE VIOLENCE AND Supersedes: December 9, 1998 WEAPONS POLICY Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To promote a safe work environment for all employees. 1.2 To establish and maintain a workplace that is free from violence,threats of violence, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior. 1.3 To encourage and foster a workplace that is characterized by respect and the use of acceptable conflict resolution techniques. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District employees, regardless of their organizational unit, on District property or off site with a District employee. Additionally,all persons who perform any services for the District, regardless of their employment status,are covered by this policy. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Workplace violence includes threats,violent behavior, harassment, intimidation and other disruptive behavior, direct, indirect, implied or actual from any person, and directed toward any person, occurring at a District facility or in connection with the conduct of District business without regard to location. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to provide a safe work environment for its employees. The District is committed to working with its employees to maintain a workplace free from violence,threats of violence, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior. All employees are responsible for maintaining a safe work environment. 4.1.1 Violence,threats, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior in the District's workplace will not be tolerated;furthermore,all reports of these types of incidents will be seriously reviewed and will be appropriately resolved. 4.1.2 This policy applies to all incidents involving District employees while they are on duty, on or off plant sites,and incidents involving non-employees perpetrating violence against District employees while they are on duty. 4.2 Available conflict resolution techniques, such as problem solving, grievance procedures and appeals processes,will be used to appropriately resolve conflicts that arise in our workplace. 4.3 The District strictly prohibits persons from possessing weapons including,but not limited to,firearms,explosives, and knives,clubs and incendiary devices on District premises, in District vehicles,in private vehicles parked on District property,and in the possession of District employees while on duty performing District related business assignments. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Prohibited Conduct 5.1.1 The commission or threat of an act of workplace violence, harassment, intimidation,or other disruptive behavior is prohibited. The following examples of such conduct,while not all-inclusive, provide an indication of the types of behaviors that are considered unacceptable. An employee who displaystexhibits prohibited conduct under this policy with regard to one or more of the following may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination, after consideration of the employee's past performance, prior discipline, length of service and work history; 5.1.1.1 Causing physical injury to another person; 5.1.1.2 Making threatening remarks,whether with intent to harm or in jest; 5.1.1.3 Aggressive, hostile or harassing behavior that creates a reasonable fear of injury to another person or subjects another individual to emotional distress; 5.1.1.4 Intentionally damaging employer property or property of another individual; 5.1.15 Possession of a weapon while on District property or while on District business;or, 5.1.1.6 Committing acts motivated by,or related to,sexual harassment or domestic violence. 5.1.1.7 Other acts or threats of violence as determined by the District. 5.1.2 Persons who engage in prohibited conduct may also be subject to legal action by law enforcement authorities. 5.2 Reporting 5.2.1 If the incident involves an emergency and requires the direct intervention of public safety personnel (i.e., law enforcement or emergency medical services),immediately CALL extension 222. 5.2.1.1 Control Center personnel will contact emergency services via 911 and will coordinate the response of public safety personnel. 5.2.2 Any situation involving the commission or threat of violence, harassment, intimidation,other disruptive behavior, possession of a weapon or any other potentially dangerous situation must be promptly reported to a supervisor or the Human Resources Department. 5.3 Risk Reduction Measures 5.3.1 Employees at Risk 5.3.1.1 Employees are expected to exercise good judgement and to notify their supervisor or the Human Resources Department if a co-worker,or other person on District property or business, exhibits behavior that could be a sign of potentially dangerous situations. Such behavior includes,but is not limited to,the following: 5.3.1.1.1 Discussing the use of weapons as a means to perpetrate violence against another or bringing them to the workplace; 6.3.1.1.2 Displaying overt signs of extreme stress, resentment, hostility or anger, 5.3.1.1.3 Making threatening statements or remarks; 5.3.1.1.4 Sudden or significant deterioration in performance; 5.3.1.1.5 Displaying irrational or inappropriate behavior. 6.3.2 Hiring 5.3.2.1 The Human Resources Department takes reasonable measures to conduct background investigations in order to review candidates'backgrounds and to reduce the risk of hiring individuals with a history of violent behavior. 5.3.3 Enforcement 5.3.3.1 Threats,threatening conduct, harassment,or any other act of aggression or violence within the District's work environments will not be tolerated. All reports of these types of incidents will be promptly investigated and will be appropriately resolved. 5.3.3.1.1 Any employee determined to have committed such acts will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. 5.3.3.1.2 Non-employees engaged in violent acts on District premises will be reported to the proper authorities and fully prosecuted. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Knives traditionally used as tools and having a blade length of three and one-half (3'/2)inches or less are only considered weapons when used or displayed in a threatening manner. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 Post in offices. 7.2 Place in the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual and on the Intranet. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Policy F10.00, Rules of Conduct 8.2 Policy B30.00, Harassment 8.4 Memorandum of Understanding for: 8.4.1 SPMT Bargaining Unit 8.4.2 Local 501 Bargaining Unit 8.4.3 OCFA Bargaining Units 8.4.3.1 Administrative and Clerical 8.4.3.2 Engineering 8.4.3.3 Technical Services 8.5 Integrated Emergency Response Plan FAHR COMMITTEE Mee117oj a ToBa. 1r99 11no/99 11n7(99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FMR99-86 19(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR RESTRUCTURING THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates of Participation long-term borrowings. 2. Authorize the General Manager to execute professional service agreements with PaineWebber, Inc. and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the COP restructuring plan. SUMMARY This agenda item reports on the findings of additional efforts to develop and implement improvements to the District's existing variable rate Certificates of Participation (COP) financing program, and prepare for future borrowings in support of the District's Strategic Plan capital improvement program. Adoption of the recommended actions will approve a restructuring plan for the District's existing COP debt issues, and will authorize staff to retain the investment banking firm of PaineWebber, and the bond counsel firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the restructuring plan. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY An estimated $1.4 million in long-term cost savings would be generated by the proposed COP restructuring plan. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. However, professional services fees would be reimbursed by cost savings. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District has five series of Certificates of Participation (COPs) comprising a total outstanding par amount of approximately $361 million. The following table describes each COP in detail. Mrm-mSpeMYammW Rq 11Msous/peMa ReR✓a111� 14m e: R. y Page 1 EXISTING COP FINANCING PROGRAM Outstanding Participating Debt S .Interest Rate Par Amount Districts Structure I Mode Series S83.300,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13,14 Junior Daily Variable Rate Series B 18,695,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Closed Senior Fixed Rate Series C 86.200,00 1,2,3,6,7,11 Junior Daily Variable Rate Series 1992 129.1 10,OOC 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate m Refunding(1) Series 1993 43,950,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate m Refunding (1) Total $361,255,00 "As of November 1, 1999. (1) Series 1992 and 1993 COPS refunded the Series 1986 and a portion of the Series'B*COPS. (2)Variable rate debt swapped to a fixed rate through maturity. The Series "A," "B," and "C" COPS were issued between 1990 and 1992 to fund a portion of the"2020 VISION" Master Plan capital improvement program. The Series 1992 Refunding COPS refunded the 1986 COPS ($107 million) issued on behalf of District Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The 1992 Refunding COPS also refunded approximately $38.4 million of the Series "B" COPS, issued in 1991. Another $39.7 million of the Series "B" COPS was refunded by the 1993 Refunding COPS. The District's five outstanding COPS are organized into a three-tier lien structure; meaning that there are three different claims on the revenues pledged to fund debt service payments on the COPS. The following table displays the combined debt service cash flows for the District's five COPS through final maturity in FY 2017-18. DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE 40 ❑Closed Sr.Lim(Series B) 35 D Open Sr. Lien(Series'92&53) 30 ■Junior Lim(Scries A&C) e 25 °0 20 S 15 10 5 0 -11 Id,, ti�ti��3 tid %"p 1�°b ti�°1 ti�g ti� tiea ti�� ti��ti tia3� ti��e ti��S ti��b tie�1 era Fiscal Year End H M.y.SlYpvg �Rgo %IM&wNA RrpvbMnPA-14M be RAN noose Page 2 With the Strategic Plan capital improvement program requiring approximately $1 billion through FY 2009-10, of which one-half the cost, or$500 million, would be financed through long-term borrowings, the District's existing COP financing program should be restructured to prepare for future "new money" debt issues. The need for modernizing the District's existing debt was highlighted during recent staff efforts to solicit banks for substitution of the Letter of Credit (LOC) for the Series "A" COPS. Discussions with potential providers were complicated by the existing legal documents which date back to 1986, with minor refinements included between 1990 and 1993. In short, Letter of Credit banks expressed limited interest in providing a replacement LOC due to the "several" nature of the Series "A" multi-district credit structure, and the resulting legal complexities contained in the existing COP covenants. Strategy The modernization of the District's existing COP program can be accomplished through a comprehensive refunding and restructuring approach that would re-align the COP legal documents to match the District's consolidated organization structure as one Sanitation District. Under this approach, the rating agencies would view the District as a single credit structure. At the same time, this would not necessarily impact the individual revenue areas within the consolidated District The plan would include a two-step process: 1) Refund the Series"A," "B," and "C" COPS through a single Refunding COP offering; and 2) Substitute modernized bond documents with the swap providers for the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS. The potential benefits to the District from modernizing the existing bond financing documents to correspond with District consolidation include: • Strengthen District's credit for request of formal "Aa" category ratings • Eliminate or modify need for Letter of Credit replacement in the future • Simplify the multiple lien levels of the COP issues • Simplify administration of multiple COP issues • Reduce overall borrowing costs • Establish foundation for future borrowings to support Strategic Plan improvements Series "A," "B," and "C" COPs The outstanding Series "A" and "C" variable rate COPs, and the Series "B" fixed rate COP would be refunded through a single (approximately $190 million)Variable Rate COP backed by a "Aa" category credit rating of the District. The Series "A" and "C" variable rate COPs represent a junior, or subordinate, lien on pledged debt service revenues, whereas the Series"B" fixed rate COP is a closed senior, or prior, claim on pledged revenues. X 1"q.E"1,•mb16aN Aqm Rg 11M&aJ Aqp Rept\11B 14m.Mc R,,,,o- a Page 3 The advantages of combining the Series "A," "B" and "C" into a single refunding COP include: Only one disclosure document (Official Statement) would be needed; • Annual debt service payments would be levelized; Reducing borrowing costs by eliminating the Series"A" Letter of Credit; and Simplify lien structure on pledged revenues by eliminating junior and closed senior liens, and issuing new Refunding COPS as senior lien, on parity with the senior lien 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS. As a senior lien obligation, the proposed Refunding COP should receive a stand-alone "Aa" category credit rating, and therefore not require bond insurance or a Letter of Credit. As with all variable rate debt obligations, a liquidity facility would continue to be required. Overall, it is estimated that present value cost savings of more than $1.4 million would be generated over the life of the Refunding COPs from a combination of a lower cost liquidity facility, elimination of Letter of Credit fees, and debt service savings. Importantly, approximately $470,000 of these savings would accrue during the first three years following COP issuance, thereby providing recovery of costs associated with issuing the Refunding COPs, including legal services and underwriting fees. Costs of issuance are estimated to range from $150,000 to $225.000. A summary of the estimated cost savings is presented in Attachment "A." Series 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPs The District's two existing Refunding COPS are variable rate obligations, which include fixed interest rate swap agreements. Called "synthetic fixed rate" financings, referring to the fixed interest rate swaps, these two Refundings represent an open senior lien on pledged debt service revenues. The existing legal documents with the swap providers, AIG for the 1992 COPs, and SocGen for the 1993 COPS, and with the bond insurer (AMBAC for both COPS), would be substituted with documents that would replicate those associated with the proposed new Refunding COP issue. Based on initial contacts, the swap providers have indicated their openness to consider a documents substitution. Staff will keep the Committee informed about the status of further discussions as they take place. Although no direct savings would be generated, the modernization of the bond documents for the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS would further streamline the overall debt structure for the District's existing COPS. Costs associated with preparing the legal documents would be reimbursed from the savings discussed earlier in this report. Finance Team and Timeline It is proposed that investment banking and bond counsel services be retained to more fully develop and implement the restructuring proposals discussed above. It is requested that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee authorize staff to engage PaineWebber and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for this project. Both a.A.a euse Page 4 firms have developed an extensive knowledge base about the financial and legal structures of the District's existing COP issues, together with a working knowledge of completing similar restructurings. In recent months, PaineWebber has demonstrated their expertise in developing and analyzing opportunities to modernize the District's existing COP financing program. They have been instrumental in developing the proposals discussed in this report. PaineWebber currently serves as the remarketing agent for the District's Series "A" variable rate COPS, and the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS. Compensation for PaineWebber would be negotiated and contingent upon successful completion of the plan through underwriting fees. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has provided legal services on various matters related to the District's existing COP financing program, and is therefore, intimately familiar with the legal documents and structures of the District's COP issues. Most recently, they have assisted staff efforts related to substitution of the Series "A" Letter of Credit. Costs for legal services would be reimbursed through cost savings upon successful completion of the plan. Given the knowledge and experience that both firms can contribute to the proposed restructuring plan, it is estimated that the plan can be accomplished in approximately 120 days, as illustrated by the following timeline. Staff would negotiate professional services agreements with PaineWebber and Orrick, Herrington & Sutciffe, for execution by the General Manager. The restructuring would be completed in advance of any future new money debt financings. Plans for future long-term borrowings will be addressed by separate reports to the Committee. ➢ Finalize debt service and cash flow modeling December ➢ Initiate formal discussions with swap providers and insurer D Develop legal documents January ➢ Develop rating agency presentation ➢ Develop disclosure documents(Official Statement) ➢ Conduct rating agency presentations February ➢ Conduct institutional investor presentations ➢ Finalize legal and disclosure documents Fxecute Refunding COP issue for Series'A,"B,'and'C' March ➢ ➢ Substitute documents for Series 92 and 93 Refunding COPs ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS A. Estimated Cost Savings KM taWaMvlav4 Ag." R. %1993e NM .R.R 111B3f ml4(q.M[ RM 87NO Page 5 ATTACHMENT A Estimated Cost Savings Refunding COPS Outstanding r Cost Reduction Estimated Present -. Par Amount Strategy Value Savin $83,300,000 Eliminate need $1,042,000 Series A Matures 811115 for high cost credit enhancement $18,695,000 Refinancefized $50000 SerleslB Matures 8/1/04 rate COPS with lower cost variable rate debt $86,200,000 Replace current $390,000 Series C Matures 8/1/17 hquidiryfaciliry with lower cost facility Totals $188,195,000 $1,482,000 Discouoted at"% FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir. 11/10/99 11/27/99 AGENDA REPORT Rem NUMW Rem NuMber FAHR99-87 1 14(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT(CAFR) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 (FAHR 98-XX) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 1999, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. SUMMARY The District's independent auditors, Moreland &Associates, have completed their examination of the District's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1999 and have again issued an unqualified opinion. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding Auditor's report to the Committee. Michael Moreland, Partner, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors. This year, staff has again prepared the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that incorporates the audited financial statements in-house. For the last five years, the District has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This years report will again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Auditors opinion letter, the Auditors Report to the Committee, the Auditors Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Auditors Appropriations Limit Report are attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT RMy.NaWyeNrlBaaN/yMr aepaYll�BwN♦peM FePxh111BGbn 1 �p)Ox e,„„a, Page 1 ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1999 2. Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 3. Auditor's Report to the FAHR Committee 4. Appropriations Limit Report HM �Ap R. %IMP aN Ap Rpa'41l iG IA�p�pac Rom- � Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE weeen9Dzte Toed.er ar. 111,0199 11117199 AGENDA REPORT Rem NumW Item Number FAHR99-89 14(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Gary Streed, Director of Finance; David Ludwin, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: PURCHASING RESOLUTION AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchasing Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-21, and OCSD 98-43. This Resolution was approved by the PDC Committee on October 7, 1999, on a 7:1 vote. SUMMARY Discussion of revisions to the Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority began shortly after the July 1998 consolidation. A cross-discipline and cross-department team was formed from representatives from Purchasing/Contracts, Engineering, 0&M, Accounting and General Counsel to review, consolidate, standardize and update four Resolutions that governed the procurement process. The PDC Committee was assigned the first review by the Steering Committee because most of the proposed changes involve the public works process. This includes construction contracts and change orders for minor and major projects; professional service agreements (PSAs) and addenda for professional engineers, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. After three months of discussion, revision, and additional information, the PDC Committee approved the proposed Resolution last month on a 7:1 vote. The FAHR Committee is being asked to approve the PDC Committee recommendations, as well as certain other changes to the more routine procurement process and delegation of authority. At the last meeting, the FAHR Committee asked for some clarification of the PDC Committee action and a review of our internal controls. The enclosed Table "1" and Table "2" reflect the clarification, and internal controls are the subject of a separate informational report on tonight's agenda. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A HNrpmuwwub.b naww Fe{ab\1 Wd eoan ApeNa Re«m\11 WNm t1�n1a« n-..e vmree Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT , ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Routine Procurements In order to be effective, purchasing authority must be delegated into the organization. Prior attempts to delineate this authority were accomplished by the use of position classifications, i.e., foreman, manager, etc. However, the various departments and divisions are organized and structured differently, and the former classification delegations were not standard, efficient or practical throughout the entire agency. Allowing each Department Head the ability to establish separate authority levels for purchases under$10,000 will provide the organization with the ability to manage more efficiently in the future. This will be accomplished by assigning various employees to levels A, B or C, with maximum purchase authorities of$2,000/$5,000/$10,000. Division Managers would continue to be limited to $25,000, and Department Heads would continue to be limited to $50,000. All purchases over$5,000 would be subject to the bidding process and purchases below $5,000 would be bid at the Purchasing/Contract Manager's discretion. Currently, the Board of Directors is required to approve any training or meeting attendance outside of the United States and Canada. The proposed Resolution adds Mexico to the destinations that may be approved at a staff level. This change would treat meetings in all of North America in the same manner and would be consistent with the spirit of NAFTA. Professional Service Agreement (PSAs) PSAs are generally within the purview of the PDC Committee and the Engineering Department. PSAs are limited by definition to agreements with firms providing engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. Currently, after a selection process, the General Manager may award a PSA for up to $25,000. He may subsequently authorize an additional $50,000 in addenda, providing no single addenda exceeds $25,000. This means that the General Manager has up to $75,000 of authority for PSAs and addenda provided certain conditions are met. H.1y.ObV peNa&vrE ApeMa Repv411B3]Boam naenea aepoK\119PXem taml Nc a..;w. vmae Page 2 The proposal would increase the total authority of the General Manager to $100,000. This amount includes the original agreement and all addenda. Certain proposal and selection processes will continue to be required, and all PSAs and addenda approved by the General Manager will be reported to the PDC Committee each month. In the case where only one firm is qualified or can best perform a service, the General Manager's authority is reduced to $50,000. All PSAs for these "specialized services" exceeding $50,000 will be awarded by the Board of Directors. Small Capital Proiects In December 1997, the PDC Committee and the Board authorized a small capital projects program. Eighteen task orders have been issued under this program, saving an average of 2.5 months on each task order, compared with obtaining Board approval of a separate contract for each project. This delegated authority has been key in alleviating a backlog of projects that had built up over several years. At the end of the contract period, each of the consultants was asked if they would extend this year's hourly rates for an additional year. All agreed to extend the contract terms for an additional year. The Director of Engineering can currently extend these agreements for one year. The proposed Resolution would allow the Director of Engineering to extend these agreements for two years, for a total of three years, with no increases in costs. Eliminating an annual RFP and consultant selection process would save staff about 350 hours per year, or 0.17 full time equivalent staffing effort, and allow the District to lock in favorable consulting rates for a three-year period. The PDC Committee has also recommended an addenda authority for the General Manager in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per task order. Public Works Projects Public Works Projects are subject to special provisions in the Government Code. Of course, the proposed Resolution complies with all of these special requirements. Currently, all Public Works Projects are awarded by the Board of Directors, and the General Manager and the PDC Committee have some change order authority. The proposed Resolution would allow the General Manager to award contracts up to $100,000 and the PDC Committee to award contracts up to $200,000. Change orders may be approved at each level, but the total contract and change order amount cannot exceed the original authority level. Cost Reduction Opportunities While one of the reasons for the proposed changes is to standardize procedures and authority levels, another is to reduce costs and save time by providing a faster, easier process to the Engineering staff. wr ftm g.m M R"w 11 +mm 14 r) Rw eaoxn Page 3 An analysis of the PSAs and Public Works Contracts that were approved by either the General Manager, the PDC Committee, or the Board from January 1998 to July 1999 was undertaken for the PDC Committee. The analysis compared the number of items that were approved by each group under the current DOA and the proposed DOA. The results are: Approved By: Approved By: Number of (Existing DOA (Proposed DOA Projects 1. Board PDC 10 2. Board General Manager 5 3. PDC General Manager 2 1. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the PDC Committee level rather than the Board, there is a 3-week timesavings, resulting in 30-weeks of timesavings over the past 18 months. 2. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the General Manager rather than the Board, there is an 8-week timesavings, resulting in 10 months of timesavings over the past 18 months. 3. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the General Manager rather than the PDC Committee, there is a 5-week timesavings, resulting in 10 weeks of timesavings over the past 18 months. The total time that could have been saved over the past 18-month period that was reviewed with the proposed Delegation of Authority is 80 weeks. Along with the timesavings, project costs would have been reduced, since staff support and associated costs would have been reduced proportionally to the timesavings. For those items that are proposed to be approved by the General Manager, a substantial amount of staff effort will be reduced since formal Agenda Reports will not have to be prepared for presentation to the PDC Committee and Board of Directors. As the number of capital projects increase over the next four to six years, the number of items requiring Board action will also increase unless this proposal is approved. With the proposed delegated levels of authority, staff will be more efficient, projects will be completed on shorter schedules and project costs will be reduced. The following table summarizes the savings in time and staff effort that would be realized if the proposed Delegation of Authority is adopted. Existing Proposed Man-hours DOA DOA Time Saved Per Saver Per Time Saved Man-hours Approval Approval No. of Approval Approval Total Saved Total Level Level Projects eeks Hours (Weeks) Hours Board PDC 10 3 2 30 20 PDC GM 2 5 7-50 10 100 Board GM 5 a 9-52 40 260 Total 90 380 HM fth OeMa�Ap Reµ %lRddmw Mew ReprY�11B3Pem�NN.Ox Re.:.em v Page 4 Over the 18-month period reviewed, staff processed 17 approvals of either PSAs, PSA Addenda, or construction contracts that could have been processed faster under the proposed Delegation of Authority Resolution. A total of 80 weeks of additional project time could have been saved with the implementation of the proposed resolution, as well as up to 380 man-hours of staff effort. The three enclosed workflow charts were requested by the PDC Committee in order to better document how the proposed changes in authority levels would affect the approval process. These charts support the previous table and indicate a substantial savings in project schedules and staff effort. In most cases, projects that can be accelerated will be projects that have reduced costs. Internal Controls The FAHR Committee requested an update on the District's internal controls. A separate informational report is being prepared to address this request, but a summary may be appropriate here. In the spring and summer of 1994, KPMG Peat Marwick conducted a special comprehensive review of our internal control systems, operating policies and procedures, and accounting practices. This review, a supplement to the annual financial audit, included the following areas: 1. Safeguarding of cash and investments 2. Segregation of duties 3. Employee expense policies 4. Gift acceptance Practices 5. Procurement and job order processes 6. Cash collection security A final report was delivered to the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Board of Directors in September 1994. KPMG Peat Marwick noted as a "significant strength" that, "The Districts maintain effective policies and procedures over operations and maintenance procurement" In 1995, staff presented complete internal control, policies and procedures to the Fiscal Policy Committee in January, March and April. These were very detailed presentations, including accounts payable, payroll and treasury management. This special review was required so soon after the KPMG Peat Marwick audit because many functions were then being assumed by District staff that had been performed by County staff prior to the County bankruptcy. Each year a financial audit is prepared by an independent accounting firm. Financial audits are performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements. They are conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and include certain test work. A separate requirement of Government Auditing Standards is a report on the auditor's consideration of internal controls over financial reporting. It should be noted that this review and report would not necessarily disclose all material HNgAYVP� MA Re(p iMa-W Aq " RK 11Wll"m 11(h).Ex Rp aaoee Page 5 weaknesses in the internal controls; their purpose is to help the auditors design a testing program. Another part of the financial audit is the "Management Letter." This letter from the auditor to the FAHR Committee discusses any weaknesses or areas of concern that were discovered, evaluates potential consequences, and proposes a solution. In addition, staff provides a summary of all PSAs and addenda approved by the General Manager to the PDC Committee on a quarterly basis. It is proposed that this would be done monthly upon adoption of the new Delegation of Authority. All task orders awarded to the small projects consultants are reported to the PDC Committee on a quarterly basis. Staff also provides, on a monthly basis, a summary of all change orders to construction contracts approved by the General Manager, and a "heads-up" to the Committee on all projects where change orders are projected to be greater than five-percent. These reports allow the PDC Committee to be fully, and continuously, informed as to how the staff is utilizing its delegated authority. To summarize, the Directors can be assured that management and staff have adequate policies, procedures, practices and reviews in place to safeguard the District's assets, and to avoid financial malfeasance. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Current PDC Authorization vs. Proposed PDC Authorization 2. Current PDC Authorization vs. Proposed General Manager Authorization 3. Current Board Authorization vs. Proposed PDC Authorization 4. Revised Table "1" 5. Revised Table "2" GGS:lc R'.Y UhNpwNa MAp R" 11Ma Ap R&p %11W 14(w),�c R..mS. v Page 6 CURRENT PDC AUTHORIZATION VERSUS PROPOSED GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZATION Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 15 - 60 Total Man Hours / 6 Calendar Weeks To Complete 6 Hours-6e Hour. AR Dneed l Reviewed/Corrected B Approved by Engineering Supervisor 8 PDC Engineering Manager Melling Contract Reviewed and Approved b Contncts Manager a Hours Y 9 AR Reviewed Hoursrtedetle Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM. 2 Hours Board Secretary Prepares PDC Package Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 8 - 10 Total Man Hours / 1 Calendar Week To Complete 44 Moore PM Prepares Noun a Haur GM 3Hours GM Package; contraRMexacB Package Memo, Approvedreviewed by Oonbad,a DOE, Attachments y AGM,and conger Approved Mars by Use GM Week 4 I Week 2 I Week J I Week 4 I Weeks I Week 6 1 Week 7 I Week 8 I Week 9 CURRENT BOARD AUTHORIZATION VERSUS PROPOSED GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZATION Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 17 - 62 Total Man Hours 19 Calendar Weeks To Complete 6Hours-50 Hours 2Hours AR Drafted(Reviewed/Connected &Approved by Engineering Supervisor& PDC Boats Engineering Manager Secretary Boartl Meeting Meeting &Hours Prepares Contract Reviewed and Approved by Contracts Manager Aft Revlewetl/Cort¢ctetl8 Board Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM. Package 2 Hours Board Secretary Prepares PDC Package Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 8 - 10 Total Man Hours / 1 Calendar Week To Complete 44 Hours PM Prepares 7 Hours 1 Hour GM Contract GM Package; Reviewed Package Manna, and reviewed by Contract,& Approved DOE, A&achmants by AGM,and Contracts Approved Manager by the GM Week t I Week 2 1 Week S I Week 4 I Week 5 I Week 6 I Week 7 I Week 8 I Week 9 1 CURRENT BOARD AUTHORIZATION VERSUS PROPOSED PDC AUTHORIZATION Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 17 -62 Total Man Hours/9 Calendar Weeks To Complete 6 Hours-60 Hours I AR Dro6ed I Reviewed I Coweded d Approved by Ereh vfing Supervisor 6 PDC Engrossing Manager Board Meeting Meeting B Noura Contract Redevved snd Approved by CordraGS M9aper AR Revhwed l Corrected 6 Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM. 2 Hours Board Secretary Prepares PDC Psekage - Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 15 -60 Total Man Hours /6 Calendar Weeks To Complete 6 Hours-60 Hours AR Drafted I ReWewsd I Corrected 6 Approved by Engineering Supervisor 6 PDC Enghnrhg Manager MeeN g CoMrecl Reviewed and A CoMrscts Manager 6 Hours Approved W ARdbyD d , orrected ADM, Approved M DOE,AGM,and GM. 2 Hours Bard Secretary prepares PDC Package Week I I Week 2 1 Week 3 1 Week 4 1 Week 5 1 Week G I Week 7 1 Week 8 1 Week 9 1 Revised Table 1 Summary of Changes to Financial Approval Levels Proposed Delegated Area Current Delegation Delegation Justification Director of Engineering Up to$50,000 per Up to$50,000 per No change from existing authority. authority for small project each task order, no each task order, no task orders. authority for addenda. authority for addenda. General Manager authority No authority for Addenda not PDC Committee recommended that for small project task order addenda. exceeding$50,000. change order or addenda authority be addenda. granted only to General Manager. General Manager authority Up to$25,000 for Up to$100,000 total Maintain consistency with GM's for PSAs and addenda. original agreement per PSA, including current authority for services, and up to$25,000 Contract and all equipment and materials. PSAs are limited to additional for each addenda. Non-PSA purchases between $50,000 professional engineers, addendum, NTE 'Specialized Service" and $100,000 are reported to the architectural, $50,000 total for all PSAs over$50,000 FAHR each quarter. PSA actions by environmental, land addenda. Total of will be awarded by the the GM will be reported to the PDC surveying and construction contract and addenda Board of Directors. monthly rather than quarterly. management services. NTE$75,000. General Manager authority Up to$50,000 Up to$100,000 Maintain consistency with GM's for Public Works Contract (additions only)for (additions only)for current authority for services, and Change Orders. each change order. each change order. In equipment and materials. In no case may no case may change change order order cumulative total The proposal would allow the GM to cumulative total exceed 5% of total begin to award Public Works exceed 5%of total Contract or$100,000, Contracts between $35,000 and contract or$100.000, whichever is less. $100,000, and would increase the whichever is less. Public Works single change order authority. All Public Works Contracts less than Contracts are $100,000 would be awarded by the awarded by the Board. General Manager. Board Committee's Up to$50,000 per Up to$200,000 total Consistency with Board Committee's authority for PSAs and original agreement per PSA, including current delegated authority of 2x the Addenda. and up$50,000 per contract and all GM's authority. each addenda, NTE addenda. $100.000 total. Primarily affects PDC Committee. Board Committee's Up to$100.000 Up to$200,000 Consistency with Board Committee's authority for Public Works (additions only)per (additions only)per current delegated authority of 2x the Contract and Change each additional each additional GM's authority. Orders. change order. In no change order. In no case may cumulative case may cumulative Allows PDC Committee to award change order total change order total Public Works Contracts up to exceed 10%of total exceed 10%of total $200,000 without further Board action. contract or$200,000, Contract or$200,000, whichever is less. whichever is less. All PW Contracts are PDC awards contracts awarded by the Board up to$200,000. Board of Directors Over$50,000 each for [change r$200,000 on Time savings due to the reduction in authority for non-Public PSA and addenda. nal contract and the volume of small projects that Works Contracts, PSAs Over$100,000 on $200,000 or 10% would have to be reviewed by the and Public Works original PW contract tal Contract, Board. Contracts. and over$100.000, or hever is less,on 10%of total contrecl, orders. Currently all PW Contracts are whichever is less, on r$50,000 for PSA awarded by the Board. change orders. Specialized Serv". \VadonttletelFxp.dtafin@10bireetl uA 13010 110. .Eoe 111211999 Table 2 9:57 AM Proposed Purchasing Resolution Levels of Authority November 1999 Article III Article IV Article V Article VI Decision Professional Services Agreements(PSA) (1) Public Works Projects Authority Supplies, Small Capital Project(2) Me or Capital Project Construction Construction Meetings, Vesting Equipment, Specialized Professional PSA Professional PSA Projects Change Training, Level Services Services(3) Consultant Addenda Consultant Addenda (Over$35,000) Orders Travel Staff A up to$10,000 Bupto 5,000 C up to 2,000 Division Up to$25,000 Up to$2,000 Manager Department Up to$50,000 Up to$50,000 Up to 2 add'I Issue RFO May negotiate Over$2,000 Head and 1 year years, no dollars and/or RFP General Up to$100,000 Up to$50.000 Up to$50,000 Up to$100,000 Up to$100,000 Up to$100,000 Lower of 5% Manager Including original or$100,000 PSA Board Up to$200.000 Up to$200,000 Up to$200,000 Lower of 10% Committee Including original or$200,000 PSA Board Of Over$100,000 Over$50,000 Over$200,000 Over$200,000 Over$200,000 Over 10% Out of USA, Directors unless specified or$200,000 Canada and In annual budget - Mexico Note(1): PSAs are limited to Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services Note(2): Small Capital Projects are projects with Engineering-related services estimated to amount to less than$50,000. Note(3): Specialized Services are those only one qualified firm can best perform. .,. _.....unnn ......e e,.� 10.25-99 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE AWARD OF PURCHASING ORDERS AND CONTRACTS; AWARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT CONTRACTS; AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS; AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT SAID POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98- 21, AND OCSD 98-43 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01 Findings - Declaration of Intent. ARTICLE II: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Section 2.01 Purpose and Scope. Section 2.02 Authorizing General Manager to Establish Rules and Guidelines. Section 2.03 Procedure for Delegation of Authority. ARTICLE III: PURCHASING SYSTEMS RE SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES Section 3.01 Purpose and Scope. Section 3.02 Purchasing System Adoption. Section 3.03 Purchasing Division Delegated Authority. Section 3.04 Requisitions. Section 3.05 Cooperative Procurement. Section 3.06 Purchases: Bidding Requirements. TLW Draft No. 14:10121M91103185-CLEAN 1 Section 3.07 Purchases: Emergency. Section 3.08 Purchases: Standardized Prices and Specialized Services. Section 3.09 Purchase Orders. Section 3.10 Purchases: Encumbrances of Funds. Section 3.11 Blanket Purchase Orders. Section 3.12 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Greater Than $50,000.00. Section 3.13 Purchases Between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00. Section 3.14 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $50,000.00. Section 3.15 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $5,000.00. Section 3.16 Inspection and Testing. Section 3.17 Purchases: Negotiated Contracts. Section 3.18 Surplus Supplies, Materials, and Equipment. Section 3.19 Sale of Real Property. Section 3.20 Recordkeeping. ARTICLE IV: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS Section 4.01 Purpose and Scope. Section 4.02 Retention of Professional Technical Consultants. Section 4.03 Small Capital Project—Defined. Section 4.04 Small Capital Project: Approval of Plans and Specifications. Section 4.05 Small Capital Project: Annual Budget Approval. TLW Draft No. 14:10121199:#103185-CLEAN 2 Section 4.06 Small Capital Project: Selection of Consultants— Procedure. Section 4.07 Major and Minor Capital Projects: Defined, Section 4.08 Major Capital Project: Scope of Work. Section 4.09 Major Capital Project: Selection of Consultants — Procedure. Section 4.10 Major Capital Project: Award of Professional Services Agreements. Section 4.11 Major Capital Project: Approval of Plans and Specifications. ARTICLE V: PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS Section 5.01 Purpose and Scope. Section 5.02 Public Works: Bidding Required. Section 5.03 Bidding Procedure: Public Works Construction Greater Than $35,000.00. Section 5.04 Approval of Change Orders to Construction Agreements. ARTICLE VI: MEETINGS (AND RELATED TRAVEL) AND TRAINING (AND RELATED TRAVEL) EXPENDITURES Section 6.01 Purpose and Scope. Section 6.02 General. Section 6.03 Policies and Procedures. ARTICLE VII: MISCELLANEOUS Section 7.01 Noncompliance. Section 7.02 Severability. TLW Draft No. 14:10121/99:#103186-CLEAN 3 Section 7.03 Effective Date. Section 7.04 Repeal of Prior Resolutions. ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01: Findings - Declaration of Intent. A. California Government Code Section 54202 requires that every local agency shall adopt policies and procedures, including bidding regulations, governing purchases of supplies, services, and equipment, and that purchases of supplies, services, and equipment by the local agency shall be in accordance with said duly adopted policies. B. California Government Code Section 54204 requires that if the local agency is other than a city, county, or city and county, policies provided for in Section 54202 of said Code shall be adopted by means of a written rule or regulation, copies of which shall be available for public distribution. C. In order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, services, and equipment, and the letting of public works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs, together with other relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, and to establish bidding procedures, a purchasing system for the District, beyond what is required by said Sections of the Government Code, is desirable and in the best public interest. D. An effective, comprehensive organization needs an administrative structure with support procedures that are logical, efficient, well-documented, are understood by the organization's employees and members of the public, and that enable timely and responsive administrative acquisition of materials, supplies, and services. The organization should also appropriately delegate authority to those persons and units having responsibility for these activities. E. The Board of Directors has determined that a delegation of authority structure provides for better training of employees which will result in improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations. ARTICLE II DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:M1031B5-CLEAN 4 Section 2.01: Purpose and Scope. In an effort to remove barriers that prevent District employees from performing their jobs at the highest level of efficiency, a delegation of authority structure will appropriately train the employees, and by providing increased responsibility and ownership, will contribute to the improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District. Section 2.02: Authorizing General Manager to Establish Rules and Guidelines. The General Manager of the District is hereby authorized to establish rules and guidelines to implement Board policies and to delegate to Staff signature authority to initiate and execute contracts or purchase orders to acquire services, including professional services, supplies, and materials, and public works project contracts, all as more particularly specified in Articles III through VI. Section 2.03: Procedure for Delegation of Authority. The following provisions establish delegated signature authority for contracts and purchase orders for the acquisition of supplies, services, materials, equipment, and professional services. The delegated authority for each functional management level will be established one level higher in the absence of specifically identified authority. The General Manager's authority is delegated to the Assistant General Manager("AGM") in the General Manager's absence. These procedures establish the framework and boundaries within which a delegates can operate, and also provide Management with a mechanism to evaluate implementation and hold the delegatee accountable for his/her actions. Upon delegation of authority by the General Manager, each Department shall be authorized to further delegate to respective employees within the Department. The delegation shall be effective upon the Department Head setting forth, in writing, the name of the delegated employee, his/her job position, and speck level of delegated authority designated as Level A, B, or C, respectively, and filing it with the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. The General Manager shall establish procedures to implement further delegated authority into the organization. For contracts and purchase orders for the acquisition of supplies, materials, equipment, and services (excluding public works contracts governed by State law and professional services agreements), the following signature authority is hereby established. The functional authority level listed describes the highest level of signature approval needed. Intermediate management approval between the initiator/requestor and listed approval level must also be obtained. A. Approval Levels All items above $100,000.00 are to be approved by the Board prior to TLW Dmft No. 16:1021I99:9103185.CLEAN 5 purchase, with the exception of emergency items, pursuant to Section 3.13. All items between $50.000.00 and $100,000.00 are reviewed and approved by the General Manager prior to purchase, and reported to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. All items below $50,000.00 are approved pursuant to the following delegation of authority: 1. Items exceeding $100,000 require Board of Directors approval, unless previously authorized by the Board for items identified in the annual District budget. 2. Items $50,000 to $99,999 require General Manager or Assistant General Manager approval. 3. Items $25,000 to $49,999 require Department Director approval. 4. Items $10,000 to $24,999 require Division Manager approval. 5. Items $5,000 to $9,999 require Level A approval. 6. Items $2,000 to $4,999 require Level B approval. 7. Items less than $2,000 require Level C approval. B. Co-Signatures. In addition to the signature of the Delegated Authority: 1. To ensure that all policies and procedures governing purchase orders and contracts are followed, all contracts or purchase orders will be signed by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or his designee. 2. All purchases for computer hardware, software, and communication equipment will be pre-approved by the Information Technology Director, or his designee. C. Procedural Requirements. All policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Directors or promulgated by the General Manager governing the procurement of services, equipment, or supplies will apply, and shall be complied with. Budgeted funds must be available prior to the acquisition of goods or services. Upon the identification of goods or services needed that are not originally budgeted, either a budget transfer request form must be completed demonstrating that adequate funds are available to cover the acquisition, or the Board of Directors must authorize a budget amendment, at which time, the item being acquired would fall into nW Draft No. 14:1012V99*103185.CLEAN 6 the budgeted category. ARTICLE III PURCHASING SYSTEM RE SUPPLIES, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS Section 3.01: Purpose and Scope. In order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, services, materials and equipment, and the letting of public works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs and other relevant factors; to exercise positive financial control over purchases; to clearly define authority for the purchasing function; to establish bidding procedures, pursuant to Section 54202 of the Government Code of the State of California, a purchasing system is deemed necessary. Section 3.02: Purchasing System Adoption. The procedures and authority set forth in this Resolution are intended to operate in concert with and supplemental to the delegation of authority granted by the governing Board of Directors in the adoption of this Resolution. Full compliance with the provisions of all Articles in this Resolution is required. Section 3.03: Purchasing Division Delegated Authority. There is hereby vested in the Purchasing Division (hereinafter referred to as "Purchasing"), under the general supervision and direction of the Director of Finance, the authority for the purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment, letting of public works contracts and establishment of rules, procedures and administrative policies relative thereto. The Director of Finance may delegate or assign any or all of the following duties to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager: A. To purchase or contract for supplies, services, materials, and equipment required by any Department or Division, in accordance with purchasing procedures prescribed by this Resolution; such administrative regulations as Purchasing shall adopt for the internal management and operation of Purchasing; and such other rules and regulations as shall be adopted by the Board of Directors. B. To negotiate and recommend execution of contracts for the purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment; for construction of public works projects; and for the disposition of surplus property and by-products of the sewage treatment process. TLW D2fi No.14:1U21199E103185-CLEAN 7 C. To submit to General Counsel for review or approval, as necessary, all contracts, purchase orders, and other related documents, the original executed copies of which shall be delivered to the Board Secretary for custodianship. D. To prepare for the District, the needed standards and specifications of quality in supplies, services, materials, equipment, and construction at the best cost and under the most favorable conditions, with due consideration to delivery and other relevant factors. E. To discourage uniform bidding and endeavor to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases and sales. F. To prepare rules, regulations, procedures, and administrative policies, and revisions thereto, governing the purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment; for the letting of public works construction contracts in accordance with the provisions of state law; and disposition of surplus property and by-products. G. To prepare rules, regulations, procedures, and administrative policies, and revisions thereto, governing the warehousing of inventories. H. To keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, including but not limited to prices, market conditions and new products. I. To prescribe and maintain such forms as reasonably necessary to the implementation of this Resolution and other rules and regulations of the District. J. To develop specifications to establish minimum standards for all purchases. K. To supervise the inspection of all supplies, services, materials, and equipment purchases to insure conformance with specifications. L. To provide for transfer of surplus or unused supplies and equipment between Departments, as needed. M. To have custodianship and control of all inventories and surplus property- N. To maintain a bidders' list, vendors' catalog file, and records needed for efficient operation of the Purchasing Division. TLW onR No. 14AMM4103185-CLEAN 8 O. To review, approve, and maintain active insurance documents for all District procurements. P. To undertake such other and future duties as, in the Director's discretion, are incidental and necessary to the conduct of the Division. O. To revise all records to reflect the sale, transfer, or reorganization of a supplier's business, or a change in the supplier's name for doing business, so long as all other terms and conditions of the original agreement remain the same. In such event of an assignment of the purchase order or contract by the supplier, the District shall not be bound until it has given its consent in writing, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. An amendment to the original agreement shall be prepared authorizing and consenting to the assignment and shall be executed by the General Manager, or his designee, on the District's behalf. Section 3.04: Requisitions. All employees of the District who need or require supplies, services, materials, or equipment to carry out the defined duties of their positions, shall submit requisitions, in advance, for purchases or warehouse requisitions to Purchasing, in accordance with the adopted rules, regulations, procedures, and policies of the Purchasing Division. Usage of the District's procurement cards shall be exempt from this requirement. Section 3.05: Cooperative Procurement. A. The District, through Purchasing, may participate in or sponsor, conduct and/or administer a Cooperative Procurement Agreement for the acquisition of procured items or services with any other public agency purchasing unit, in accordance with an agreement between the District and the other public agency. B. The District, through Purchasing, may sell to, acquire from, or use any property belonging to another public agency, including the cooperative use of supplies or services. C. Participation in the County of Orange Cooperative Purchasing Program has been expressly authorized by adoption of Board of Directors Resolution No. OCSD 98-22. Section 3.06: Purchases: Bidding Requirements. Except as hereinafter provided, purchasing of supplies, services, materials, or equipment shall be by bid procedures as set forth in this Article III, when the purchase is estimated to have a value greater than Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars; the commodities or services TLW Drefl No. 14:10/21199:N103195-CLEAN 9 Y may be obtained from more than one vendor; or are not standardized as to price; and no emergency exists. Section 3.07: Purchases: Emergency. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may be a threat to the continued required operations of the wastewater treatment plants and facilities owned by the Districts, or when purchases are immediately necessary for the preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the public health or safety, the Division may purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment required for immediate use, in an amount greater than One Hundred Thousand $100,000.00) Dollars without observing the procedures set forth in this Resolution. The General Manager or his designee shall advise the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be ratified by the Board of Directors at its next regular meeting. Section 3.08: Purchases: Standardized Prices and Specialized Services. In the purchases of supplies, services, materials, or equipment in which the items to be purchased have a demonstrated uniformity in price, or it is determined that there is a sole source, or the provider of services is determined to be uniquely qualified to perform specialized services, Purchasing may make such purchases without observing the bidding procedures of Section 3.12 below. Section 3.09: Purchase Orders. Purchases of all supplies, services, materials, or equipment shall be made by purchase order and may also require a formal written contract, when determined necessary or appropriate by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. To ensure that all policies and procedures governing purchase orders and contracts are followed, all contracts or purchase orders will be executed by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or as delegated by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. Purchasing and employees requisitioning supplies and equipment shall be responsible that purchase orders and requisitions are in conformity with the spirit and intent of this Resolution and that no purchase has been broken into smaller units to evade any requirement of this Resolution. Purchasing shall retain, in its files, one copy of all purchase orders issued during two (2) years preceding, on which copy of the purchase order, there shall be a list of bidders and prices bid for the materials or equipment purchased, or if no bids or quotations were taken or received, a full statement as to the reason therefor. Section 3.10: Purchases: Encumbrances of Funds. Except in cases of emergency, no purchase order shall be issued for any supplies, services, materials, or equipment, unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation balance in the fund against which said purchase is to be charged. Section 3.11: Blanket Purchase Orders. The Purchasing Division may issue annual blanket purchase orders for recurring purchases of miscellaneous supplies TLW Dn8 No.14:ID21/99d103185-CLEAN 10 ` that: A. Because of economic considerations, the items are not carried in stock in the District's warehouse; B. Are stock items that have been designated as appropriate sole source acquisitions; C. Purchasing determines it is in the best interests of the District to competitively bid a blanket order for inventory items; or D. Are for miscellaneous supplies, services, materials and equipment where such purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment may be procured from a single vendor during the budget year, without observing the procedures prescribed in Section 3.12 below, when, in its discretion, it is determined that such blanket purchase orders are at a cost favorable to the District and will result in more efficient procurement of such items. Blanket purchase orders shall be in conformity with the spirit and intent of this Resolution. The Purchasing Division shall, at the beginning of each budget year, file a list of such purchase orders and the estimated annual amount with the Director of Finance. Section 3.12: Bidding Procedure: Purchases Greater Than $50,000.00. A. Award to Lowest Bidder. Except as otherwise provided in this Article III, purchases of supplies, services, materials, and equipment of estimated value greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars shall be by written contract or purchase order with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder (unless a Request for Proposal ("UP") solicitation instrument is utilized), pursuant to the procedures prescribed herein. B. Award Approval. Purchases of supplies, services, materials, and equipment that have appropriate budgetary approvals shall be bid and awarded directly by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or as delegated by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. Supplies, services, materials, and equipment that exceed the budgeted amount, or effect policy recommendations or ratifications, or are sole source contracts exceeding $100,000.00, and all public works contracts, shall require Board of Directors' approval prior to issuance or award of a purchase order or contract. C. Notice Inviting Bids. The notice inviting bids shall include a general description of the articles or services to be purchased or sold, shall state where bid forms and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for opening bids. 1. Published Notice. The notice inviting bids shall set a date TLW Draft No. 14:10121199*103185-CLEAN 11 for the opening of bids. The notice shall be published one (1) time at least ten (10) days before the date for the opening of the bids. Notice shall be published In a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the District's jurisdiction, or by electronic bulletin board procedures designed to reach the industry or market of supply. 2. Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids, or receive bids electronically, from all qualified, responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on the Bidders List maintained by the District, or who have requested their names to be added thereto. 3. Bulletin Boards. Purchasing may also advertise pending purchases or sales by a notice posted on a public bulletin board in the Purchasing Division Office, and by electronic bulletin board, as deemed appropriate by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. D. Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by Purchasing, bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract specifications or in the public notice inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to the return of bid security upon the full execution of an awarded contract or issuance of a purchase order, by the successful bidder. A successful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within the prescribed time after the notice of award of contract has been delivered to bidder, unless the District is responsible for a delay in the prescribed time. The Board of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the Board of Directors awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the lowest bidder's security equal to the difference between the low bid and the awarded bid, shall be forfeited to the District, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. E. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed or electronically received bids shall be submitted to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager and/or Secretary of the Board of Directors, and shall be identified as a bid on the envelope or the electronic bulletin board. Bids shall be opened in public by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or his designated representative, at the time and place stated in the public notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid opening. In cases wherein the Request for Proposal ("RFP") instrument is utilized, all RFP's will be opened, and only the name of the Proposer shall be read aloud at the time and place set forth herein. F. Rejection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If all bids are rejected, the TLW Oral)No.14:1021M:#103185-CLEAN 12 Board of Directors, by majority vote, may declare that the materials or supplies may be acquired at a lower cost by negotiation in the open market and authorize the purchase in that manner. G. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, (with quality and service being equal), and if the public interest will not be best served by a delay of readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the award. H. Performance Bonds. Purchasing shall have authority to require a faithful performance bond, a labor and materials bond and/or a warranty bond, before entering into a contract in an amount as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the District. If the Purchasing Division requires any of these bonds, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids and in the contract specifications. Section 3.13: Purchases between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsections 3.12(A) through 3.12(H) above, Purchasing may award a contract to purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment in an amount greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) and less than One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars, without obtaining bids and following the procedures set forth above when the Contracts/Purchasing Manager determines that: A. By purchasing immediately, it can avoid an imminent price increase or realize a substantial price discount that is available on a short term basis only; or B. It can obtain supply, services, materials, or equipment immediately that might not otherwise be available at such time as purchasing procedures could be completed; or C. Said contract for supplies, services, materials, or equipment has Board of Directors' approval for multiple one (1) year renewal periods. All such contract renewals shall require the Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager approval; or D. The supplies, services, materials, or equipment are only available from a sole source. E. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may cause a threat to the continued required operations of the treatment plants, or when purchases are immediately necessary for preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:#103185-CLEAN 13 public health or safety. All purchases between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00 shall be reviewed and pre- approved by the General Manager and reported to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. Section 3.14, Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $50,000.00. Purchases of supplies, services, materials, or equipment, of an estimated value in the amount of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars or less on which bidding is not required by state law, may be made by Purchasing in the open market without observing the same procedures as prescribed by Section 3.12 above. The procedures to be used for these purchases are as follows: A. Minimum Number of Bids. Open market purchase shall, whenever possible, be based on at least three (3) bids and shall be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, and shall be by written contract or purchase order. B. Solicitation of Bids. Bids shall be solicited by written requests to prospective vendors or purchasers and/or by telephone, facsimile transmission, electronic bulletin board, and/or by public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the Purchasing Division Offices. C. Receipt of Bids. Bids shall be submitted to Purchasing, which shall keep a public record of all open market orders and bids for a period of two (2) years after the submission of bids or the placing of orders. D. Exceptions. Purchasing may purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment without observing the procedures prescribed in Subparagraphs A. B, and C above, if supplies, services, materials, or equipment are only available from a sole source. All such purchases shall be approved by the Director of Finance, the requesting Department Head, and the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. Section 3.15. Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $5,000.00. Purchasing may purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment of a value in the amount of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars or less per purchase order, without observing the procedures prescribed in this Section when, in the Contracts/Purchasing Manager's discretion, it is determined that observing such procedures would not result in a lower overall cost to the District. Record of such decision shall be fully stated in the purchase order file as to the reason therefor. Section 3.16: Inspection and Testing. The supplies, services, materials, and equipment delivered, and contractual services performed, shall be inspected to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the purchase order or 7LW Draft No.14:1021M:*103185-CLEAN 14 contract. Purchasing shall have authority to request professional services, or to require chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with specifications. Section 3.17: Purchases: Negotiated Contracts. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Resolution, the Board of Directors may, when it appears in the best interests of the District, authorize the Staff to negotiate and award a contract for purchase of supplies, services, materials and equipment without observing the procedures prescribed in Sections 3.12 and 3.14 above. A. When such authorization has been granted for purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment of an estimated value in the amount of One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars or greater, the Staff shall obtain the concurrence of the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as appropriate, prior to awarding such purchase. B. Whenever any contract for supplies, services, materials, or equipment has been entered into between the District and a person or entity providing such supplies, services, materials, or equipment, and Purchasing determines that it is in the best interest of the District to continue said contract with such person or entity, Purchasing may, in its discretion, negotiate an extension of such contract without observing the bidding procedures prescribed in Sections 3.12 and 3.14 above; provided, the contract contains provisions for subsequent extension periods; has been approved and awarded by the Board of Directors; and/or has prior budget approval, as provided in Section 3.12. C. This Section shall not apply to the letting of public works construction contracts in excess of Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars. Said contracts shall be governed by the provisions set forth in Article V of this Resolution. Section 3.18: Surplus Supplies, Materials, and Equipment. All Departments and/or Divisions shall submit to Purchasing, at such times and in such form as Purchasing shall prescribe, reports showing all supplies, materials, and/or equipment which are no longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out. Purchasing shall have authority, as deemed appropriate by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, to sell, exchange for, or trade in on new supplies, materials, and equipment, or dispose or, as deemed appropriate, all supplies, materials, and equipment which cannot be used by any other Department or Division, or which have become unsuitable for District's use. TLW Deft No.14:1021M.#103185-CLEAN 15 Section 3.19: Sale of Real Property. No real property of the District may be sold, or any negotiations leading to such sale may be made, without prior approval of the Board of Directors. Section 3.20: Recordkeeping: A record of all sales or surplus property and by-products shall also be maintained by Purchasing upon or in which is maintained the record of the bids received for the property or by-products sold, or if bids were not taken or received, a full explanation thereof. Such records shall be maintained for two (2) years after the sale. ARTICLE IV PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS Section 4.01: Purpose and Scope. The Orange County Sanitation District, in the interest of uniformity, fairness and cost effectiveness desires to establish policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. Section 4.02: Retention of Professional Technical Consultants. This Resolution establishes a procedure to be followed in the seiection and retention of Professional Technical Consultants in the areas of engineering, architecture, environmental, land surveying, construction management services and related services. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or firs providing engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform, including studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning, programming, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are excluded. It is recognized that no two individuals or firs have equal skills, training, or experience and that the qualities of such persons vary. Accordingly, Professional Technical Consultants shall be selected based upon the District's discretion and opinion TLW Draft No.14:1=1199:0103185.CLEAN 16 as to which particular consultant is best qualified to perform the work (hereinafter referred to as "projects") in question. For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California, as required by law. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local based firm when more than one firm is being considered, G. If the project is funded, either in whole or in part, by federal funds that require, as a condition of establishing or maintaining eligibility for federal funds, that firms working on the project maintain an affirmative action employment program, then the firm selected for the project must certify to having such a program. The District also recognizes that the scope of services and the qualifications of consultants can differ significantly between major capital facilities projects and small capital projects. The criteria set forth in Paragraphs C and D above may be waived by District for small capital projects, The procedures set forth in this Resolution shall govern the retention of such professional consultants. Section 4.03: Small Capital Project: Defined. "Small capital project" is defined as a miscellaneous capital improvement or facility modification, replacement, or TLW Draft No.14:1021/99:#103185-CLEAN 17 repair project, related to plant safety, reliability and efficiency enhancements where professional consulting services are estimated to be in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for each project. Section 4.04: Small Capital Project:Approval of Plans and Specifications. The Board of Directors delegates to the Director of Engineering, as Professional Registered Engineer, the authority to approve the design, plans, and specifications for construction of new or modified District facilities that is deemed a small capital project, as defined in Section 4.03 above. Section 4.05: Small Capital Project: Annual Budget Approval. Upon approval by the Board of Directors of an annual budget, the District's Staff shall be authorized to solicit contract proposals from professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management firms to perform the required services for the approved small capital projects, as defined and prescribed herein. Section 4.06: Small Capital Project: Selection of Consultants— Procedure. A. District's staff shall compile a master pre-approved list of 5-10 firms having the required expertise to perform the required professional service for a small project. The master list of firms will be selected based upon a solicitation, review of qualifications, and Board approval. The original term of the agreement shall be for one (1) year. Thereafter, the Department Director shall be authorized to recommend to the General Manager, an extension of the professional consulting services agreement for up to two (2) additional one (1)-year renewal periods, for a total of three (3) years, with each of the parties designated on the approved master list. The professional consulting services agreement for each party on the master list shall be forwarded to the purchasing office. The Engineering Department Staff shall prepare the appropriate requisition documentation to insure future payment to the consultant. B. As a need for an individual specific project arises, the District will implement the Agreement by issuing a task order identifying the specific project by name and number and including the approved scope of work required of the consultant for the project. The scope of work for any individual task order, shall not entail a cost in excess of$50,000.00. There is a maximum annual limitation of$200,000.00 for each individual consultant purchase order under the provisions of this Section 4.06. C. The Department Director shall first obtain at least two (2) price proposals from consultants before the task order is awarded to a consultant. This requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Department Director where a determination is made that the subject work is unique such that only one (1) consultant is available to perform the work, or where significant time constraints or emergency conditions dictate that one (1) consultant be solicited for a price proposal. The TLW Draft No.16:1021I99:A107185-CLEAN 18 Department Director, or his designee, shall review the proposals specifically addressing cost and ability to meet District schedule requirements. Based on the evaluations, the Department Director is authorized to award the task order. D. Once the consultant is selected for the award of a small capital project and the task order is executed by the District, the Department Director shall issue the notice to proceed. E. Addenda to a particular task order shall be approved by the General Manager. However, the amount for each addendum may not exceed $50,000.00, and the cumulative total for all addenda may not exceed $50,000.00. The Department Director shall issue the task order addendum in letter form. Section 4.07: Major and Minor Capital Projects: Defined. "Major capital project" means the construction, repair, modification, or rehabilitation of the District's Capital Facilities, including treatment plants, trunk sewers, pump stations, ocean ouffall, administrative and support facilities, and other facilities related to District operations, where the cost of professional technical consulting services are estimated to be in an amount in excess of$50,000.00 for any project. These projects may require Selection Committee or Board approvals. Specialty-item capital projects are defined as projects other than Small Capital Projects, as defined in Sections 4.03 through 4.06, inclusive, where the cost of professional technical consulting services are estimated to be in an amount more than $50,000.00, and less than or equal to $100,000.00 and require only General Manager approval. Requirements for Scope of Work, Proposal, Procurement and Negotiation Agreement Continuation of Services, Agreement of Services, and Conflict of Interest apply for both Major Capital Projects and Specialty-Item Capital Projects, with difference only in authorization levels. Section 4.08: Major Capital Project: Scope of Work. A. For every project approved by the Board of Directors and for which outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work. B. The scope shall define the extent of the services and the time required. Section 4.09: Major Capital Project: Selection of Consultants - Procedure. For the employment of any professional consulting services for major capital projects, the following procedures shall apply: 7LW Draft No.14:102IM:A103185-CLEAN 19 A. Proposals - Notice Requesting. Staff shall prepare a Request for Proposal ("RFP") or a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for the scope of work which shall include a request for the firm's qualifications, personnel capability, demonstration of firm's capabilities, identification of personnel assigned to the project, estimate of number of hours for each aspect of the project, fee proposals and conflict of interest disclaimer. The Request for Qualifications' process may be used, at Staffs discretion, to narrow the field of firms submitting proposals on the project. District shall maintain a comprehensive list of professional consultants' demonstrated competence. Notice shall be mailed to all firms requesting notice of any RFP or RFQ issued by the District. Optionally, notice may be given by publication in professional journals or publications of general circulation. B. Staff Screening Committee. A screening committee of at least two (2) staff members as chosen by the Department Director shall review all submitted proposals and prepare a recommendation for selection of the best qualified consultant to the Selection Committee, as described in Paragraph D below. C. Proposals - Contents. Proposals submitted shall: 1. Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the services required. 2. Include a description of the firm's qualifications for performing the proposed work. 3. In the case of a proposal for construction management services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project. 4. Include past performance records of the firm. 5. Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted. 6. Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the project. TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:#103195.CLEAN 20 7. Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each aspect of the scope of work for such personnel. 8. Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. The form of the fee proposal shall be as described in Subsections F2 and F3 below. 9. Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer. 10. Provide any other information required to property evaluate the firm's qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. TLW Draft No. 10:1021M:t103185.CLEAN 21 D. Selection Committee- Membership. 1. The members of the Board of Directors Standing Committee principally responsible for the project and contract under consideration for approval shall constitute the Selection Committee for District projects. 2. At the discretion of the District Chair, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for specific projects. E. Review of Proposals by Staff Committee and Selection Committee. 1. The Staff Committee shall review each proposal and the qualifications of each firm with due consideration of office location, reputation in the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on similar-type projects, the project approach, understanding of the scope of work, financial standing, number of qualified personnel and their availability for the project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project being considered. 2. The Staff Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide the services sought by the District based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications. 3. The Staff Committee, upon making a determination of the fully qualified firms, shall rank the firms considered, in order of preference, based upon the qualification of each, as described in Subparagraph E(1) above. Thereafter the Committee shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified firms. Based upon the fee proposal, the committee may recommend to the Selection Committee or the Board of Directors an individual or firm for award of the contract. The recommended individual or firm can be ranked lower than firms with higher fee proposals. 4. The Selection Committee shall receive and review the recommendation of the Staff Committee and either award or recommend to the Board of Directors, either the approval or disapproval of the Staff recommendation to award a contract, as authorized in Section 4.10 below. F. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures will be strictly adhered to: TLW Draft No.14:10121199:k103185-CLEAN 22 1. The Staff Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Staff Committee. 2. The proposal for fees associated with the services as submitted by the selected firm shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the Staff Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. 3. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee. 4. If it is the decision of the Staff Committee to use methods for compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Staff Committee in its recommendation to the Selection Committee and the Board of Directors. 5. The Staff Committee shall review the compensation requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Selection Committee and Board of Directors, shall be certified by the Staff Committee as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the firm. 7. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked firm. B. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis, and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with another. G. Continuation of Services- 1. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board determines that it is in the best interests of the District to retain the same firm for subsequent phases of related work, the Staff Committee or the Selection Committee may be TUN Daft No.14:1021/994103185-CLEAN 23 authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional work. 2. Continuation of services may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a preliminary engineering report and the services for said work are satisfactory to the Board and the procedure of examining other firms for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary or cost effective. 3. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. H. Specialized Services. 1. In the event that specialized services are required where it is determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a speck project for professional fees estimated to be in an amount greater than $50,000.00, the Staff Committee will report to the Selection Committee said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. 2. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual under Subparagraph H(1) above, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board of Directors for consideration. I. Agreement for Services. 1. Upon approval by the Board of a negotiated agreement for professional services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. 2. The contract shall include, but not be limited to the following terms: (a) A statement of the scope of the project. (b) The basis and individual elements of the fees. (c) The basis for payment to the firm. (d) The time limits in which the services must be performed. TLW Draft No.14:10121994103195-CLEAN 24 (a) Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. (f) If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the District may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. (g) For projects exceeding $50,000.00 in fees or in other cases as determined by the District, errors and omissions insurance in an amount recommended by the General Counsel (based upon engineering data from the Department Director) shall be required, unless the Standing Committee or Board of Directors, as the case may be, waives said insurance. For projects that involve small engineering studies where a consultant is asked to provide a report not related or leading directly to a design project, the General Manager (based upon engineering data from the Department Director), in his discretion, may waive the requirement for the consultant to provide errors and omissions/professional liability insurance. J. Conflict of Interest. 1. The District maintains a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 at seq., which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees, or agents in the conduct of project work for the District. 2. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified fine to provide professional consulting services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $290.00, or the amount as fixed by Government Code Section 89503, or California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 18940-1, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the Districts Conflict of Interest Code, shall TLW Dwft No. 14:1021/99a107185-CLEAN 25 report any amount of gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. 3. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District's Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 4.10: Major Capital Project: Award of Professional Services Agreements. A. Primary Agreement. The award and execution of an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the District shall be made in accordance with the following delegations of authority: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Heads Solicitation of Requests for Qualifications ("RFQ") and Requests for Proposals (RFP"). 2. General Manager Authorization to evaluate proposals and to execute contracts up to $100,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve Profes- (Committees) sional Services Agreements of over $100,000.00 up to $200,000.00. 4. Board of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee, and approve Professional Services Agreements for over $200,000.00. B. Primary Agreement -Addenda. The award and execution of an addendum to an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the District shall be made in accordance with the following: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Head Authority to negotiate addenda and make recommendation to General Manager. 2. General Manager Receive recommendation of Department Head and approve contract TLW Draft No.14:102IM:0103185.CLEAN 26 changes in an amount up to $100,000.00 per addendum. The total additive value of all addenda shall not exceed $100,000.00. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve contract Committee) changes between $100,000.00 and $200,000.00. The total additive value of all addenda shall not exceed $200,000.00. 4. Board of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee and approve contract changes in amounts over$200,000.00 for each change order and cumulatively for the agreement. Section 4.11: Major Capital Project: Approval of Plans and Specifications. The procedure and authority for the approval of the design plans and specifications for construction of new or modified District's major capital projects is as follows: A. For any project with approved budget authority, the Director of Engineering is authorized to advertise for construction bids, set a bid date, and receive all bids. B. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering may advertise for bids, and upon receipt, the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder will be submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. C. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer, is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering shall submit the project to the Standing Committee for recommendation, and based thereon, to the Board of Directors for approval. D. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the bid will be submitted to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors, upon receipt of the bid, shall approve the plans and specifications of the project and may award a contract. nW Dmft No.14:10121M:01031B5-CLEAN 27 E. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, Staff shall present the bid and a recommendation to the Standing Committee for review and recommendation to the Board of Directors. ARTICLE V PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Section 5.01 Purpose and Scope. Public works contracts are herein defined as contracts with duly licensed contractors in the State of California for the furnishing of labor, materials, equipment and permits, as deemed necessary, for the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and any other public building, structure or improvement necessary to the operation of the District, in an amount greater than Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars, as per California Public Contracts Code Sections 20783 at seq. Section 5.02: Public Works: Bidding Required. When the expenditure required for a public works construction project exceeds Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars, it shall be contracted for and let to the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the provisions of California Public Contracts Code Section 20783. Section 5.03: Bidding Procedure: Public Works Construction Greater Than $35,000.00. Procedures for soliciting bids and awarding contracts for public works projects for more than Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars, shall be by written contract with the lowest responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures prescribed herein and in accordance with applicable provisions of California Public Contracts Code Section 20783. A. Notice Inviting Bids. The Notice Inviting Bids shall specifically describe the work to be performed, shall state where bid forms, Specifications, and General and Special Provisions may be secured, and the time and place for receiving and opening sealed bids. 1. Published Notice. The Notice Inviting Bids shall set a date for the opening of bids. The first publication or posting of the Notice shall be at least ten (10) calendar days before the date for the opening of the bids. The Notice shall be published at least two (2) times, not less than five (5) days apart, in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the District. TLW Draft No. 14:102V99:#103185.CLEAN 28 2. Mailed Notice. Unless the work to be done is proprietary, the Notice Inviting Bids shall be published in a public newspaper which carries Orange County public works bid notices, not less than twenty-one (21) calendar days before the date of opening of bids. TLW Draft No, 14'.101211991103185-CLEAN 29 3. Bidders List. The Engineering Department may also solicit sealed bids from all qualified, responsible, prospective suppliers whose names are on a Bidders List that may be maintained by District. B. Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by the Purchasing Division, bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract Specifications and in the public Notice Inviting Bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security, upon full execution by the successful bidder of an awarded contract by the District. A successful bidder shall forfeit its bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within the prescribed time after the Notice of Award of Contract has been delivered to the bidder, unless the District is responsible for the delay in the prescribed time. The Board of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the Board of Directors awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the lowest bidder's security equal to the difference in an.amount between the low bid and the awarded bid, shall be forfeited to the District, and the surplus, if any, shall be retumed to the lowest bidder. C. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Director of Engineering or Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or their designees, and Secretary of the Board of Directors, and shall be identified as a bid, on the envelope. Bids shall be opened by the Director of Engineering or Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or their designee, in public, at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid opening. D. Rejection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If, after the opening of bids, all bids are rejected, the Board of Directors, on a Resolution adopted by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, may declare that the work can be performed more economically by force account, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in the open market and may have the work done in a manner stated in the Resolution in order to take advantage of this lower cost. E. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price (with quality and service being equal) and if the public interest will not be best served by a delay or readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may accept the one it chooses, or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the award. F. No Bids. If no bids are received, the District may have the work done by force account; may readvertise for bids pursuant to the procedures herein; or may select a contractor by negotiation. TLW Draft No.14:10,21/99:0103185-CLEAN 30 G. Emergencies. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may be, a threat to the continued operation of the wastewater facilities, support facilities and/or administrative facilities operated by the District, a contract for the repair or replacement of the public facility may be ordered by the General Manager without complying with the provisions of this Resolution or the California Public Contracts Code. This authority is hereby delegated to the General Manager, or his designee, by the Board of Directors pursuant to the authority of California Public Contracts Code Section 22050. In such event, the General Manager shall advise the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be confirmed by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the Board of Directors at its next regular meeting. H. Surety Bonds. The Purchasing Division shall require a Faithful Performance Bond and a Labor and Materials Bond. A Warranty Bond may be required before entering into a contract in an amount up to one hundred (100%) percent of the amount of the contract, as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the District. The form and amount of the bond shall be described in the Notice Inviting Bids, or in the contract Specifications. I. Cost Records. Cost records shall be kept in the manner provided in Sections 4000 to 4007, inclusive, of the California Government Code. Section 5.04: Approval of Original Construction Contract Agreement and Change Orders to Construction Agreements. The procedure and authority for the approval of the original construction contract agreements and change orders to construction agreements is as follows: A. General Manager. The General Manager is authorized to approve an original construction contract agreement in an amount not to exceed $100,000.00, and any change order, with a total amount of the change order additions (not the net amount of the change order), not to exceed $100,000.00, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original agreement amount, or$100,000.00, whichever is less. B. Planning Design & Construction Committee. The Planning, Design & Construction Committee is authorized to approve an original construction contract agreement in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00, and any change order, with a total amount of the change order additions (not the net amount of the change order), not to exceed $200,000.00, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 10% of the original agreement amount, or $200,000.00. whichever is less. TLW Draft No.14:10121199:i103195•CLEAN 31 C. Management and Staff. At such time as the Staff becomes aware of a fact or circumstance that will likely result in total additive change orders exceeding 5% percent of the original contract amount, it shall be presented to the Planning, Design & Construction Committee at its next regular meeting for review, consideration, and possible action. ARTICLE VI MEETINGS (AND RELATED TRAVEL) AND TRAINING (AND RELATED TRAVEL) EXPENDITURES Section 6.01: Purpose and Scope. This Article sets forth the procedures and scope of delegated authority by which District employees are authorized to incur expenses for budget-approved meetings and training in furtherance of District business. Section 6.02: General. A. Meetings or training exceeding $500.00 will be itemized, as well as possible, in the approved budget. It is recognized that some meetings and training cannot be preplanned. B. All out-of-country travel (excluding Canada and Mexico) requires approval by the Board of Directors. C. Meetings or training requests exceeding $2,000.00 will be approved by the Department Director. D. Meetings or training requests less than $2,000.00 will be approved by the Division Manager. E. Established approvals must be received prior to arrangements for meetings or training being made. Section 6.03: Policies and Procedures. All policies and procedures governing meetings and training, such as the use of District forms and justification, will be followed. TLW Draft No. 141 WV99:R103185-CLEAN 32 ARTICLE VII MISCELLANEOUS Section 7.01: Noncompliance. Any transaction failing to comply with this Resolution in any respect is voidable in the discretion of the Board of Directors, and any employee willfully and knowingly violating any provision of this Resolution may be subject to disciplinary action. Section 7.02: Severability, If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the entire Resolution or any of the remaining portions thereof. The Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 7.03: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the Board of Directors. Section 7.04: Repeal of Prior Resolutions. Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-21, and OCSD 98-43 are hereby repealed in their entirety. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held , 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary TLW Draft No. 14 10121199'.#103185-CLEAN 33 + BOARD OF DIRECTORS VW,ngData I Toed.moo-. nmisa AGENDA REPORT Item Nu ItamNumbar e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, adding a public health element to the existing public information program for an additional amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $275,895, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the additional amount of$35,500. SUMMARY In June of 1999, a Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications Group (NCG) was awarded by the Board of Directors providing for public relations services for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the Groundwater Replenishment System. To enhance community education and outreach efforts for the Groundwater Replenishment System, staff recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with NCG be approved. Addendum No. 1 provides for the addition of a communications program specifically targeted at health and environmental professionals. The program would work in concert with and be managed by NCG's current program and would focus on seeking out the active involvement of university- associated medical and environmental personnel to help lead the public health portion of the Groundwater Replenishment System's Phase III Public Information Program. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA Addendum amount and budget necessary for this project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORF Water Management Projects, a) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H.M tlhWGa,dadgard Agenda Rlp mkl adJ Road Agenda Rep dati 11 RRd-1B LLx R-Aad.. � Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 A major goal of the GWR System's public information program is gaining support for the project from environmental academia and the medical/healthcare community. They are highly credible sources on water and health issues with both the media and the public. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. was one of the firms that submitted a proposal for Phase III of the GWR System Public Information Program. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. was not chosen because, while it was very strong in its area of expertise of communicating to medical and environmental audiences, it was weaker in other areas determined vital to the public information program. The firm, however, offers some unique qualifications that were explored by staff and NCG after the final Phase III selection was made. McDaniel Lambert's principals include Mary McDaniel, an occupational physician and lawyer who would serve as project manager, and Dr. Charles Lambert, a toxicologist who has ties and relationships with various local universities. They bring together a unique combination of expertise, communication skills and field experience in health, environmental relations and conflict resolution, as well as experience and contacts within these areas in Orange County. Additionally, Mary McDaniel is an expert and lecturer on the Peter M. Sandman strategies for responding to community outrage and risk communications. NCG is in agreement with the addition of the Mary McDaniel team to the overall project education and outreach effort. For clarity and direction, staff believes NCG should manage the science, health and environmental effort. In August, the Joint Cooperative Committee authorized staff to solicit a proposal from NCG to develop a communications program focused on environmental, health and medical audiences. ALTERNATIVES Any alternative action would require consideration by the Joint Cooperative Committee and the OCWD Board. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table H Mip.Em W. al Apxtla Rv VIM R %110. ldd Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE) Groundwater Replenishment System JOB /CONTRACT NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASN AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%) Pro'ea Development S 700.000 S 700.000 $ 700.0D0 S 700,000 S 700.000 $ 7W000 100% Design Staff $ 2,349,000 $ 2.349,000 S 2.349,000 S 2.349.0D0 S 2,349,000 S 200.000 9% Design Consultant PSAs S 7,500.000 S 7.500.000 S 7,500,000 S 2.405.150 $ 35.500 S 2.440.650 $ 100.000 4% Construction(Other) $ 2,653.900 $ 2.653.900 $ 2.653.900 $rS5.4 $ Construction Staff $ 9.345. 00 S 9.345,600 $ 9,345,600 $ $ Construction Contract S 86,481.500 $ 86.481.500 S 86.481,500 S Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 12.895.000 S 12.895.000 $ S TOTAL $ 121.925.000 $ 121.925,000 $ - $ 121,925.000 35.500001 S 5.489,650 S 1,0N, 18% by desenawm.Wua9.t tame Fmm R.. .E IVI rres FAHRCOMMITTEE Maeln9Da[e roae.orwr. 11/10/99 11/1]/99 AGENDA REPORT IFm�Ru�m� Iem Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE ORDINANCE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-09: a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 2, 1999. b. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1125 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSDA 1, and pass to second reading and public hearing on December 15, 1999. SUMMARY Last month the Committee considered and approved some clarification to Ordinance No. OCSD-09 which established the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Program for 1999-2000. While General Counsel and staff were preparing those approved clarifications for Board consideration, we discovered additional issues. These are described in the attached memorandum from General Counsel and are highlighted in the proposed Ordinance through strikeout and bold typefaces. �amiws %ag. am rdre aew^s11M emm Agwda aepw 11aane,,,Vaoc Re.. aaaae Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION General Counsel will present an oral report at the meeting. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. General Counsel Memo 2. Draft Ordinance Yrtl W.d1Y.y.WVp�q.�N/�.Ma Ra %'M a—,/gwry R. 111�17he " ° ^ Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-09 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a management report, including financial and system facilities needs of the District, and wishes to reaffirm the policy of the District of imposing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly connect to the District's system or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989", hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, identifying the required future development of District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District's service areas; and, B. That the District has undertaken, commencing in 1997, a comprehensive update and revision of the Master Plan, which was adopted October 27, 1999, to hereafter be known as the "Strategic Plan"; and, C. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system; and, D. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or "fees" to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system as a financial TFN:pl:#112779:11/10199-REDLINE 1 payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed; and, E. That the District's connection charge ordinances, included authority for the District to levy an excess capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge large quantities or high strength wastewater; and, F. That the District(s) adopted a revised, comprehensive excess capacity charge by ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, which ordinance(s) was subsequently repealed November 15, 1995 pending completion of the Financial Rates and Charges Report; and, G. That the District on February 22, 1996 adopted a moratorium on the collection of excess capacity charges until the Financial Rates and Charges Report was completed and a revised Capital Facilities Charge was adopted; and, b H. That a final report (the "Determination of Financial Rates and Charges Report"), based upon studies and reports of District's engineering and financial advisors, and an extensive evaluation by an Advisory Committee of industrial, commercial, and residential users of the system (the "Rate Advisory Committee"), was prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors to assist and guide it in its considerations for the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09; and, J. I. That the Report has been made available to the public and has been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of law; and, lf.J. That following adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 on July 21, 1999, certain ambiguities and uncertainties were discovered, relating to the implementation of the Ordinance. It is now appropriate, to insure ease of administration and clarity of understanding by those persons and entities governed by the Ordinance, that the provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 be revised; and, l:. K. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the TFN:pj.#112779:11/10/99-REDLINE 2 District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and, M. L. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal system facilities; that the costs of owning, operating, and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and, N.M. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and, Q N. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and, R.0. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Definitions 1.1 "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. 1.2 "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 6, 7, and 8 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis as determined by the District. TFN:pj:#112779:11110199-REDLINE 3 1.3 "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including, but not limited to installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines and appurtenances to make the connection, that does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. 1.4 "Nondiscriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non-public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. 1.5 "Predecessor Districts" means former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, which jointly owned and administered the property and sewerage system facilities of the District, which consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District, as a single entity, effective July 1, 1998. 1.6 "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of this State. Section 2: Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under sections 305-305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit as authorized above may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. 7FN:pj:#112779:11110199-REDLINE 4 There will be a nondiscriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. Section 4: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. 4.1 Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. 4.2 Upon application of any property seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 5: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity newly connecting any property to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth in Table 1. TFN:pj:#112779:11110199•REDLINE 5 TABLE 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110' Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675' High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600'2 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1.475 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1.620 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910 Studio Per Unit $ 580 ' Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $1,820;and all calculations shall be on a per square foot basis. 'The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at$1,600 per 1,000 square feet, but shall be incrementally increased from the present amount at five(5)levels, and five(5)time periods as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective January 1,2000 $ 900 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective July 1,2000 $1,130 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective July 1,2001 $1,600 per 1,000 sq. ft. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District,and in the Building Department of each City within the DistricL 'Low Demand connections are the following categories of users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categores. **High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundnes; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. —All other connections are Average demand users. TFN:pj:C112779:11110IN-REDLINE 6 Section 6: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Sign cant Commercial— Industrial Users—Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Article 3, due to having federally-or District-regulated or significant discharges. B. An Existing SCIU is any SCIU discharger connected and discharging to the District's system prior to My 9, 1995 January 1, 2000. C. A New SCIU is any discharger who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or-#OFMY 4 3999 January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraph A above, but, subsequent to July 4, 4995 January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU. €, D. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Section 5 Table 1 above, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subparagraph E, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7 or Section 8 hereof. F, E. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of July-1 4999 January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for the fiscal year 1998-99 or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIUs solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit pursuant to Section 6 above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow — 25,000 gallons per day; BOD —150 pounds per day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. TFN:pj:#112779:11110M-REDLINE 7 44. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge as prescribed by Sections 7 and 8 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. l* G. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the SClll of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his delegated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 7. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New aad Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIUs aad—all shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the following amounts: Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 Section 8: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial— Industrial Users. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 8A above: TFN:pI:#11277#:11/10199-REDLINE 8 Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 C. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 9: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 10: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for the prior category of use. Section 11: Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3 and 4 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 12: No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other property. TFN:pj:#112779:11Ho/99•REDLINE 9 Section 13: Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 7 above. Section 14 : Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations. Section 15: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 16 : Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2000. Section 17: Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-09 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 18 : Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two- thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Thomas L. Woodruff, District Counsel TFN:pI:*112779:1 W0199-REDLINE 10 BOARD WORKSHOP rnamnq Date Taed.of Dlr. 11110,99 11/jL AGENDA REPORT Iem Rem Nombe 5 to Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS: YAKIMA COMPOSTING FACILITY, TULE RANCH/MAGAN RANCH GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve an Agreement for: a) the purchase of the 1,808.15 acre portion of Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kings County for an amount not to exceed $3,254,400; b) a three-year option to purchase the 4026.58 acre portion of Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kern County for an amount not to exceed $4,545,600 contingent on obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air compost facility on Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch, or upon the District's discretion; and c) the retention of Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a portion of the District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an annual amount not to exceed $2,540,000 for both Kings and Kern Counties Class B biosolids' land application. 2. Approve an Agreement with the Yakima Company that provides for. a)the reservation of 100,D00 wet tons per year of capacity for compost and storage in consideration of the payment of$1,250,000 upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air compost facility; b) the ability to use the Yakima Company's land application sites for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at$25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees, by the Yakima Company on their permitted sites in Kern County during the compost site permitting and development period for an annual amount not to exceed$775,000; c)the ability to land apply District's-produced Class A EO biosolids'for $25.D0 per wet ton for an annual amount not to exceed $625,000; d)the payment of a composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton plus a prorated share of the annual permit fees for ten years at an annual amount not to exceed $2,625,000; and e) the acquisition of a Site Purchase Option to purchase all or a portion of the compost site for a price to be determined at the time of the transaction. SUMMARY Staff is proposing that the District's Board of Directors enter into agreements with Tula Ranch and the Yakima Company in order to insure reliable and cost-effective long-term management of the District's biosolids. Biosolids reuse options available for the management of the southern California agencies' biosolids needs are becoming insufficient as a result of increased regulatory requirements, including complete bans on Class B biosolids land application. The action proposed is required in order to secure capacity with two viable biosolids management options currently available. •Definitions of Class B, Class A,and Exceptional Quality(EQ)Biosolids can be found on page 7 of this Agenda Report. HF ftSeaMa MA,e Repam\1BN Beaty♦ae.Re�\11aeJlam ISM RSMW arms, Page 1 The proposal requests an initial capital investment of$3,254,400 to purchase the Kings County 1 portion of Tula Ranch for the land application of Class B biosolids. A subsequent capital investment of 54,545,600 for acreage in Kem County is proposed to take place contingent on Tula Ranch obtaining compost facility permits. Through this purchase, the District will obtain a reliable, long-term biosolids reuse site and reduce its biosolids management fees from $25.00 to $22.40 per wet ton. The proposal also requests payment of a capacity fee of$1,250,000 to the Yakima Company in order to reserve capacity in the proposed compost facility. This payment would only take place upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary site permits. This capacity fee will be repaid to the District in the forth of reduced biosolids management fees from $27.40 to$25.75 per wet ton applied to 100,000 wet tons per year for ten years. Alternatively, the capacity fee would be credited toward the compost site acquisition by the District. Upon completion of the land acquisition and the Yakima Company compost facility the District's annual biosolids management costs are expected be stabilized at less than $5,000,000. Financial Implications of the Proposal Capital Investment Proposed Operation Costs Current Operation Costs Class B land appcat on 6 EQ Class B land application) Tula Ranch ion s Co. $3 254 400 gj2 l) per wet ton Class B E25.00 to $28.00 r wet ton Tula Ranch Kem Co. S4,545,600 $27.40 r wet ton for EQ $ 25.00 to $26.00 per wet ton The Yakima Company $1,250,000 1 $25.75 per wet ton for EQ N/A Pima Gro 3 Bio Gro SO I N/A 1 $25.45 to$36.00 per wet ton Purchase and composting of District's biosolids contingent on Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch(Tula Ranch)obtaining all necessary permits for a compost facility. Composting cost expected to be similar to that of the Yakima Company. 2 Fee repaid to the District in the form of reduced biosolids management fees from$27.40 to$25.75 per wet ton applied to 100,000 wet tons per year for ten years(total fee reduction of$1,650.000). 3 Pima Gro and Bio Gro land application she viability in Riverside is tenuous due to increased regulatory pressure. The District currently contracts with three biosolids management contractors Pima Gro, Bio Gro, and Tula Ranch to land apply biosolids in Kings, Kem, Riverside, and San Diego counties. Existing biosolids management cost range from$25.00 to$25.90 per wet ton during fair weather, and from $28.00 to $36.00 during inclement weather,for an annual cost of approximately$5,000,000. These contracts curen0y provide the District with reliable and diverse biosolids management capabilities. At the time these contracts were entered, there was an abundance of lands permitted for biosolids land application in the region and several biosolids management companies were competing for management of the Districts biosolids. Things have changed. Management options are no longer abundant and costs are increasing. This abundance of permitted land and management contractors resulted in significant biosolids management savings to the District for the past four years, as shown in the following table. Recent contract amendments drafted in response to the increased costs of regulatory Blosogds Reuse Cast S7 38A $5.8 $5.8 55.5 Pro,. SS 0 SS 0 $5 5/.8 8 $4 54.0 54.0 0 c $3 0 $2 i St So 9142 92-M 93-94 9495 98-96 98-97 97.0 98-99 99.00 Fiscal Year H My EO1a9^^4+18»id 4prytlr Rea, 1999 B-W♦q Repa,4111BPllem to ft R. a'mse Page 2 compliance are expected to increase the annual costs of the District's biosolids management to approximately$5,000,000 per year. Of greater concern, biosolids management capacities under these existing contracts have been severely limited due to several regulatory developments that have either resulted in, or threaten to cause, a significant decrease in land permitted for Class B biosolids land application in California. The most drastic of these regulatory developments have occurred in Kern County, where there has been a reduction in the amount of permitted land from approximately 52,000 acres in 1995 to approximately 20,000 acres today for all southern California POTWs to utilize. The recently adopted Kem County ordinance will also significantly increase the cost of Class B biosolids management due to new costs associated with annual permit fees, sampling and analysis, inspection fees, vehicle license fees, transportation, and legal and consulting costs during the next three years. We estimate that this will increase our annual cost by$1,000,000 to over$1,500,000 if all of the District's biosolids were managed in Kem County. Land application of Class B biosolids will be banned in Kern County on January 1, 2003. Potential regulatory developments in other counties, including Riverside County where 75%of the District's biosolids are currently being managed, and at the state level in Sacramento, will result in additional regulations, decreased capacity, and increased costs to manage Class B biosolids. These regulatory developments demand that the District take immediate action to insure reliable long-term biosolids management options. It is clear that any long-term sustainable biosolids management program supporting biosolids recycling must be flexible and based on producing an Exceptional Quality(EQ) biosolids product with a reliable Class B biosolids land application as a backup management option. To achieve this goal of producing an EQ biosolids product in the limited time available, the OMTS Committee, at their October meeting, authorized staff to pursue proposals received from Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company. Specifically, the OMTS Committee directed staff to negotiate contract terms with the Yakima Company for the management of the District's biosolids, and to negotiate with Tule Ranch for the purchase of the entire site for long-tens management of the District's biosolids as a means to increase the District's biosolids management options. Securing capacity at a site that can produce an EQ biosolids compost product and property in Kings County for the land application of Class B biosolids provides the District with insurance that its biosolids will be managed in an environmentally safe and cost- effective manner. What Staff is Proposing: Staff is proposing that contracting with the Yakima Company and purchasing Tule Ranch will: ♦ Provide the District with a secure inclement weather biosolids management site in Kem and Kings Counties, ♦ Allow for the development of possibly two permitted compost sites to achieve the District's Strategic Plan goal of obtaining EQ biosolids, • Provide long-tern biosolids management capability, and ♦ Control price fluctuations. If the Districts Board of Directors decide to pursue the agreements with Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, the District's biosolids management program will gain management diversity and additional capacity. The agreements will have an immediate beneficial impact on the District's biosolids management program during the next few months while the Tule Ranch escrow proceeds. The District's biosolids will continue to be managed under the three existing contracts with Pima Gro and Bio Gro in Riverside County, and Tule Ranch in Kem and Kings Counties. A benefit may be realized during this time in that the District may be able to have MWftye,W Ape Re XIMB MAWe RerpLL\11pNlem 18 Oa1 Page 3 exclusive use of Tula Ranch's Kings County acreage that is accessible for land application during inclement weather, and the Yakima Company's sites in Kern County. Use of these sites would result in the District avoiding significant additional costs associated with Pima Gro's and , Bio Gro's inclement weather biosolids management options that would be imposed when their normal biosolids management sites in western Riverside become saturated. The capacity offered in Riverside County by Pima Gro and Bio Gro will continue to be relied upon during the time required for the development of the composting facilities. It is expected that Riverside County will continue to allow the land application of imported Class B biosolids for at least the next year. The continued, short-term use of land application in Riverside county may be especially important to the District if Kenn County is successful in upholding the costly road fees, and sampling and monitoring requirements as enforceable during the next three years that Class B biosolids can be land applied in Kern County. Upon completion of one or both of the compost facilities, the District would no longer need to utilize Riverside County as a management option, but may choose to maintain the ability to land apply Class B biosolids for additional capacity. It is expected that the Yakima Company's compost facility can be permitted and constructed within 18 months. After completion of one or both of the Compost facilities, all of the Districts biosolids could be properly managed by a combination of the options available at Tula Ranch and provided by the Yakima Company. Specifically, of the 180,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids produced annually by the District, 50,000 wet tons would be directly land applied on the Kings County portion of Tula Ranch, and the other 130,000 wet tons could be managed by the Yakima Company through composting, or a combination of composting at the Yakima Company and Tula Ranch compost facilities. Both the Yakima Company and the Tula Ranch compost facilities have adequate available acreage for the land application of the finished compost product The acquisition of the Tula Ranch property and the biosolids management capacity offered by the Yakima Company provides the District several benefits including wet weather biosolids management capacity, stabilizing price fluctuation of biosolids management, potential EQ biosolids compost sites, and acreage to manage its biosolids. Tula Ranch Approval of the agreement with Tula Ranch provides the District with access to 1,808.15 acres of Class B permitted land in Kings County, and 4,026.58 acres in Kern County for the application of Class B biosolids through January 1, 2003 and EQ biosolids thereafter. Since the November Steering Committee meeting, staff and Districts Counsel have commenced the drafting of a land purchase contract and biosolids management contract that will be presented to the Board of Directors for approval at their November 17, 1999 meeting. The contracts deal points will include: ♦ Purchase price of the 1,808.15 acres of land, located in Kings County, at$1,800 per acre ($3,254,400), • A three-year purchase option on the 4,026.58 acres located in Kern County, exercised upon Tula Ranch's successful permitting of a compost facility, or upon the District's discretion compost permits are not obtained, for$1,129 per acre ($4,545,600), and immediate imposition by the District of reasonable restrictions on the Kern County acreage that: ♦ Limits the source of biosolids that can use the land for biosolids management, • Limits the amount of biosolids used on the site, • Gives priority to the management of Districts biosolids on the site, and • Authorizes the use of excess capacity that can be used by Tula Ranch for other P01 W biosolids management contracts. ♦ The payment of 25% gross crop revenue on Kings County site to the District. H M'V-� Wbarn,Rep Ilm2 WAD""Re4 %11W lac Re , % Page 4 As with all biosolids management options available today, the acquisition of Tule Ranch is not without concerns. The Kem County biosolids ordinance will place a ban on Class B biosolids land application in three years on the Kem County portion of Tule Ranch. During the three year period that Class B biosolids can be land applied in Kern County, significant additional regulatory requirements will be imposed, pending the results of the agencies legal challenge. These regulatory requirements include a Kem County road impact fee of$3.37 per wet ton, costs associated with field and biosolids sampling and monitoring requirements, and reduction in capacity due to existing soil nitrogen limits. These additional regulatory requirements are estimated to add an additional $6.00 to $8.00 per wet ton to the existing management costs for Class B biosolids land applied in Kern County. It is possible that a portion of the road impact fee can be avoided by accessing a majority of the Tule Ranch acreage via roads in Kings and Tulare Counties. The Kings County portion of Tule Ranch is subject to future regulation under the State Water Resources Control Board's(SWRCB) General Order. This regulation is in draft form and is in the process of undergoing an environmental impact report (EIR). As currently written, the SWRCB's proposed General Order places daily limits on vehicle miles traveled to the site, contains dust restrictions, and imposes cumulative heavy metal limits that may limit the site's capacity. The SWRCB plans on certifying the EIR before October 2000. Kings County is also in the process of drafting a reasonable ordinance that is expected to allow for the continued land application of Class B biosolids. Another concern is the ability to permit a biosolids compost site in Kern County. Under the existing anti-biosolids climate Tule Ranch may experience difficulty in obtaining a conditional use permit(CUP) in Kern County and air quality permits from the Central Valley Air Pollution Control District Upon successful permitting, additional tasks and expenses related to compost facility design, site development costs, capital investment, and acquisition of other composting feedstocks remain. All of these efforts are based on the continued viability of the use of Class EQ biosolids compost in Kern County. The Districts offer to purchase the Kem County acreage is contingent on successful completion of the permitting process and obtaining all necessary approvals. The Yakima Comoanv Staff received an unsolicited offer from the Yakima Company to manage the District's biosolids at a proposed compost facility in western Kem County. The proposed facility will be designed to receive, store, and compost up to 600,000 tons per year of organic feed stocks, including up to 360,000 tons per year of biosolids. The Yakima Company has commitments from the owners of 29,000 acres of farmland in the area to use the finished EQ product. Since the November Steering Committee meeting, staff has worked with the District's Counsel and the Yakima Company to develop an agreement to be presented to the Board at their November 17, 1999 meeting. The basic proposed deal points include: ♦ Reserving 100,000 wet tons per year capacity for compost and storage at the compost site when complete, • Guaranteeing a minimum of 8,333 wet tons per month (100,000 wet tons per year) of District's Class B biosolids be managed at the site after site development, • Obtaining the ability to use Yakima Company's land application sites for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at a $25.00 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees on sites permitted by the Yakima Company in Kem County during the compost site development, ♦ Land application of District's-produced EQ product for$25.00 per wet ton by the Yakima Company, N.hy,CplypeMal9a'E ApwNG Pepv4110.9 BNN ApeMa Ppa'6\116R`mn 18 O% Page 5 ♦ Payment of a $1.250,000 capacity fee to the Yakima Company after all necessary compost site permits are issued to the Yakima Company, secured by a trust deed on the 320-acre compost site property, • Payment of a composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton (this price reflects a credit for the payment of the $1,250,000 capacity fee in the amount of$1.65 per wet ton for a ten year period), ♦ Payment by the District of its share of the annual permit fees, prorated over the entire volume of biosolids received at the compost site (e.g., annual Kem County CUP, and Waste Board permit fees, expected to be less than$0.50 per wet ton), • Payment of the management fees will be subject to an annual adjustment for cost fluctuations based on a mutually acceptable formula tied to a government index, and ♦ Payment of 100% of compost revenue to the District during the Yakima Company's ownership, and a percentage of the revenue apportioned to District's percent of ownership if the site is sold by the Yakima Company, less transportation and other direct costs. The Yakima Company is also offering the District the right to purchase the compost facility, after permitting and construction. The deal points for site acquisition include: ♦ An option to purchase all or half of the developed site, pending the Los Angeles County Sanitation District's (LACSD) interest in half of the site, at a value to be determined as follows: • Reimbursement for all reasonable expenditures by the Yakima Company associated with permit acquisitions, land purchase, site design, site construction, and • Compensation for the Yakima Company's goodwill, assignment of feedstock contracts, assignment of contracts with farmers, land application permits, farm equipment, and permitting and development efforts by: • A lump sum payment upon acquisition to the Yakima Company, in an amount to be determined, but not in excess of$1,000,000, pending LACSD's interest in the site, and ♦ Payment of a$1.50 to$2.00 per wet ton of biosolids management fee above the actual cost of biosolids composting for a period of ten years. • Any unused portion of the $1,250,000 capacity fee would be applied toward the purchase. Purchase of the site is proposed to commence after permitting, design, and construction, but does not preclude exercising the option to purchase immediately after the permitting is complete. Site design and construction by the Yakima Company is expected to cost 25%to 30% less than that contracted for by an agency, and take significantly less time to complete. District's staff and consultants will actively provide input as to the appropriate design of the facility in order to protect our long-term interest in the site's integrity. If the District does not exercise the purchase option, the Yakima Company will offer the first right of refusal to the District to purchase the site within 90 days of notice of a bona fide purchase offer. The District would retain the ability to exercise the purchase option detailed above the Yakima Company offers the first right of refusal. If the site is not acquired by the District before the end of the ten-year contract,the Yakima Company would provide two additional five-year biosolids management option periods. Permitting is expected to take six to eight months at a cost estimated to be between $50,000 and $150,000, depending on the level of opposition to the project. Kem County Planning Department plans on using a Negative Declaration for California Environmental Quality Act compliance on this project The District believes that in order to make this project successful, both the District and LACSD need to participate in the proposal. The contract has been drafted in order to create the best possible and least complicated avenue towards this goal. HWy traW�.eMa&uN�ywGa Rgma116�BoaN•perdu NepaLLNt WM,n 18.Co1 . a Page 6 ` Concerns similar to those that may affect Tule Ranch apply to the Yakima Company's offer, specifically, the impacts of the Kem County biosolids and the ability to permit a biosolids compost site. The Yakima Company does not have a route to their land application site that would avoid the use of Kern County roads. If upheld by the courts, Class B biosolids land applied by Yakima during the next three years would be subject to the proposed $3.37 per wet ton road impact fee. Unfortunately, the success of permitting and constructing a Class A compost facility in Kern or Kings Counties is yet to be determined. District's consultants in Kern County believe that both sites will be able to obtain all of the required permits. Each site must apply to the county for a Conditional Use Permit, the State for a solid waste facility permit, and the air pollution control district for air quality permits, and be subject to the required public hearing and comment process. Biosolids compost is not exempt from regulation. The federal biosolids regulation, 40 CFR Part 503, regulates biosolids composting. California's Waste Board regulates the compost facility, and the California Department of Food and Agriculture is proposing to regulate the compost product Local government agencies are becoming active in regulating biosolids compost. Imperial County recently drafted a proposed biosolids ordinance that would ban the use of EQ biosolids, including biosolids compost. Alternatives and Concerns: Should the District continue to wait on making a long-term commitment like this? With the rapid deterioration of biosolids management capacity available, staff believes that the District must act immediately in order to obtain reliable biosolids management options. What about pursuing new biosolids management technologies? The long-term biosolids management decision to acquire Tulle Ranch/Magan Ranch and contract with the Yakima Company may preclude the District's ability to take advantage of current and developing technologies for many years. Many of these technologies, including heal drying, conversion to fuel, etc., have been around for decades but in the past have not been implemented successfully. What's our greatest concern regarding these proposals? The beneficial reuse of Class B biosolids, and even EQ biosolids, is not guaranteed to be a viable option. No biosolids reuse option is guaranteed. Class B biosolids land application in Kings County appears to be secure under the SWRCB's proposed General Order. During the ordinance development process, the Kem County Board of Supervisors encouraged agencies to convert Class B biosolids to EQ biosolids for future use in Kem County. The viability of both of these options can change altered upon the modification of the applicable regulation. In light of these concerns, staff recommends approving the agreements with Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company. Staff also recommends maintaining existing contracts with Bio Gro and Pima Gro that utilize biosolids land application sites in Riverside and San Diego Counties during the site acquisition, permitting, and development process. 'Class B biosolids are biosolids that have been processed to achieve a significant pathogen reduction(e.g., using anaerobic digestion as performed at the District)and meets vector attraction reduction requirements. Gass A biosolids are biosolids that have been further processed(e.g.,composting)in order to meet the most stringent pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. EQ biosolids are Class A biosolids that meet the most stringent limits for pollutant concentrations. Pathogens are disease-causing organisms, such as certain bactena,viruses, and parasdes(e.g., salmonella,fecal coliform). Vectors are organisms,such as rodents and insects that can spread disease by carrying and transferring pathogens. HMy.JpUpMW\9w!IywWa ago4\16W ByN��pM�eIpW11B to. R. a Page 7 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS H.My.CUYpeMABmE ApeMo Repx lMD-W•peeEa Rg kllB 18.M Revee: vmw Page 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS rxebog Dm Tn Bd Mqr. 11j7 99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number IWMNumber 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Employer-Employee Relations Resolution GENERAL MANAGERS RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-24, Adopting a New Employer-Employee Relations Resolution, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34. SUMMARY It has been nearly 25 years since the District updated the rules and regulations regarding the unions and negotiations. Changes in the law since 1975 make it desirable and appropriate to update the old employment relations rules. The primary feature of the new Resolution is that it allows only one employee organization per bargaining unit, thus eliminating the possibility of having multiple organizations representing employees in the same classifications and units. Section 6 of the old Resolution 75-127 allows recognition of an employee organization by any "reasonable method". After the District adopted that Resolution, the Supreme Court held that a public agency could restrict a bargaining unit to representation by only one employee organization. However, in order to do so, the Court stated that the public agency must (1) adopt an employee relations ordinance providing for exclusive representation, and (2) hold an election among the employees. (Covina Azusa Firefighters v. City of Azuza) The other significant change is in the decertification procedure. Currently, a union must receive a majority of those who vote in an election to gain exclusive recognition. However, to decertify the same union, it would take a majority of all employees in the group regardless of whether they voted in the election. The new resolution will change the decertification procedure to be consistent with the recognition procedure to provide a level playing field for all employee organizations. The new Resolution also allows the Director of Human Resources to modify bargaining units based on his or her own initiative, rather than only upon request of an employee organization. Finally, it contains a "grandfather clause" so as not to disturb the rights of existing employee organizations. The FAHR Committee approved the Resolution in concept and directed the Human Resources Director to "meet and consult" with the unions. The meet and consult requirement has been completed and the resolution is now ready to be adopted. wmmuny habemeaBwN ba+aa Rmoeieee twob•ee.aa Re�auiean. e ad R �„ Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT , ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 99-24 H hq.EC`apsrgal&aN Al.n.R.RWIMB N Ap.ft Repb1110d11em 19 Ed R. Page 2 w RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99 ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 9834 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 9834. WHEREAS, Joint Resolution No. 75-127 established rules and regulations for Employer-Employee Relations of the former County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, upon consolidation of the Districts into the Orange County Sanitation District, former Joint Resolution No. 75-127 was re-enacted without change as Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; and WHEREAS, changes in the laws and District practices since 1975 make it desirable and appropriate to update the District's employment relations rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, State law (the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act) permits local agencies to adopt reasonable rules and regulations for the orderly administration of labor relations after meeting and consulting with appropriate labor organizations, NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That this Resolution upon adoption approves the rules and regulations set forth herein for employer-employee relations and repeals Resolution No. OCSD 98-34 10W89 02 1 w RULES AND REGULATIONS ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This Resolution implements Chapter 10, division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Sections 3500 et seq.) captioned "Local Public Employee Organizations", by providing orderly procedures for the administration of employer- employee relations between the District and its employee organizations. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of the State law. It is the purpose of this Resolution to provide procedures for meeting and conferring in good faith with recognized employee organizations regarding the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment of employees in appropriate units and that are not preempted by Federal or State law. This policy is supplemented by provisions recognizing and defining the rights of employees to join organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on matters affecting employee relations or to represent themselves individually in dealing with the District. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: a. "Appropriate representation unit" means a group of employee classes or positions, established in accordance with the criteria set forth in Article II, Section 6. b. "Confidential employees" are those employees who, with authorized access, assist and act in a confidential capacity to and for persons who formulate, determine, and effectuate management policies with respect to labor relations. C. "Consult'means to communicate verbally or in writing for the purpose of presenting and obtaining views and advising of intended action. d. "Contract employee"means an individual who works for the District pursuant to a written contract as set forth in Policy A10.00 in the "Human Resources Department Policies and Procedures" manual. e. "Day"means calendar day unless expressly stated otherwise. f. "District' means the Orange County Sanitation District. 105689 v2 2 w g. "District representative" means any individual designated to represent the District with regard to employer-employee relations. h. "Regular employee" means any person employed by the District except elected officials and temporary and contract employees. i. "Employee organization" means any organization which includes employees of the District and which has as one of its primary purposes representing such employees in their employment relations with the District. j. "Employee Relations Officer" means the Director of Human Resources or the Director's designee. k. "Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization" means the employee organization which has been formally acknowledged by the District as the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate representation unit, pursuant to a majority vote of the employees in such a unit. There shall be no recognition of employee organizations other than exclusive recognition. I. "Impasse" means the existence of unresolved differences after good faith negotiations over an issue regarding wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment. M. "Management Employee" means an employee having responsibility for formulating, administering or managing the implementation of District policies and programs. n. "Mediation" means the efforts of an impartial third person, or persons, functioning as intermediaries, to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary resolution of an impasse. 0. "Meet and confer in good faith", or"meet and confer", means that the representatives of Exclusively Recognized Employee Organizations and the District shall have the mutual obligation personally to meet and confer promptly upon request by either party and continue for a reasonable period of time in order to exchange freely, information, opinions, and proposals, and to endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation, including the mutual obligation to execute a written document incorporating any agreement reached. P. "Proof of Employee Support" means (1) an authorization card recently signed and dated by an employee, or(2)a verified authorization petition or petitions recently signed and dated by an employee, or(3) employee dues deduction authorization, using the payroll register for the period immediately prior to the date a petition is filed except that dues deduction authorizations for more than one employee organization for the account of any one employee shall not be 105ea9�2 3 a considered as proof of employee support. The only authorization which shall be considered as proof of employee support shall be the authorization last signed by an employee. The words "recently signed"shall mean within sixty (60) days prior to the filing of a petition. q. 'Professional Employees"means employees engaged in work requiring specialized knowledge and skills attained through completion of a recognized course of instruction, including but not limited to, attorneys, physicians, registered nurses, engineers, architects, teachers, and the various types of physical, chemical, and biological scientists. r. "Resolution"means, unless otherwise specified herein, this "Employer-Employee Relations Resolution" and any amendments thereto. S. "Scope of Representation"means all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee relations, concerning which the District is obligated by law to meet and confer, including, but not limited to, wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment; except that the parties may, by mutual agreement, negotiate on matters of employment concerning issues upon which negotiation is neither required nor prohibited by the law or this Resolution. t. "Supervisory employee"means any employee having authority, in the interest of the District, to hire, transfer, suspend, layoff, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but required the use of independent judgment. SECTION 3. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES a. Employees of the District shall have the right to form,join and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on matters within the scope of representation. b. Employees of the District shall also have the right to refuse to join or participate in the activities of employee organizations and shall have the right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with the district to the extent permitted bylaw. C. No employee shall be interfered with, dominated, intimidated, restrained, coerced or discriminated against by the District because of the exercise of the rights contained in this Resolution. d. No employee shall be interfered with, intimidated, restrained, coerced or discriminated against by any employee organization because of the exercise of the rights contained in this Resolution. IDseaevz 4 SECTION 4. MANAGMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES a. In order to insure that the District is able to carry out functions and responsibilities imposed by law, the District has and will retain the exclusive right to manage and direct the performance of District services, which includes, among others, the exclusive right to: • Determine issues of public policy; determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set levels and standards of service; • Determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment; direct its employees; • Relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work, for cause or for other lawful reasons; • Maintain the efficiency of District operations; • Contract out work; • Determine the methods, means and personnel by which District operations are to be conducted; and, exercise control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work. b. The District retains its right to amend, modify, or rescind any policies, practices or agreements which impact upon wages, hours or working conditions of employees in cases of emergency. Emergencies shall be defined as acts of God, natural disasters, legislative acts,judicial action or other acts which are beyond the control of the District, and which would authorize District action without meeting and conferring under State law. If under this section the District amends, modifies or rescinds any policy, practice or agreement, such amendment, modification or rescission will continue only for the duration of the emergency. ARTICLE II. EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION PROCEEDINGS SECTION 1. FILING OF RECOGNITION PETITION BY EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION An employee organization that seeks to be formally acknowledged as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization representing the employees in an appropriate representation unit shall file a statement with the Employee Relations Officer containing the following information and documentation: 105M v2 5 a. Name and address of the employee organization. b. Names and titles of its officers. C. Names of employee organization representatives who are authorized to act on behalf of the organization. d. A statement that the employee organization has, as one of its primary purposes, representing employees in their employment relations with the District. e. A statement whether the employee organization is a chapter of, or affiliated directly or indirectly in any manner, with a local, regional, state, national or international organization, and, if so, the name and address of each such other organization. f. Certified copies of the employee organization's Constitution and By-Laws. g. A designation of those persons, not exceeding two in number, and their addresses, to whom notice sent by regular United States mail will be deemed sufficient notice to the employee organization for any purpose. h. The job classifications or titles of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate. i. A statement that the employee organization has in its possession proof of employee support to establish that thirty percent (30%) of the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate have designated the employee organization to represent them in their employment relations with the District. j. A request that the District formally acknowledge the petitioner as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization representing the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate for the purposes of meeting and conferring in good faith. k. The petition, including the proof of employee support and all accompanying documentation, shall be declared to be true, correct and complete, under penalty of perjury, by the duly authorized officer(s)of the employee organization executing it. I. The District or its Employee Relations Officer may request verification of the sufficiency of the signatures submitted in support of a petition. Such request for verification shall be made within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the petition. 105689 Q 6 SECTION 2. RESPONSE TO RECOGNITION PETITION Upon receipt of the Petition, the Employee Relations Officer shall determine whether: a. There has been compliance with the requirements of a Recognition Petition; and, b. The proposed representation unit is an appropriate unit in accordance with Section 6 of Article 11. If an affirmative determination is made by the Employee Relations Officer on the foregoing two matters, he or she shall post a notice of election setting an election date not less than forty-five (45) days and not more than sixty (60)days after such determination. If either of the foregoing matters are not affirmatively determined, the Employee Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the petitioning employee organization. The petitioning employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition or appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer pursuant to Article 11, Section 8 of this Resolution. SECTION 3. OPEN PERIOD FOR FILING CHALLENGING PETITION Within thirty (30) days of the date the notice of election is posted, any other employee organization may file a request to be the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization of employees in the same unit by filing a petition which conforms to Section 1 of Article II. SECTION4. ELECTION PROCEDURE a. The Employee Relations Officer shall arrange for a secret ballot election to be conducted by the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service or by a mutually selected third party subject to the provisions of this Resolution. In the event the State Mediation and Conciliation Service, or other mutually selected third party, if any, declines or is unable to conduct the election in a timely fashion, the election shall be conducted by the Secretary to the Board of Directors in accordance with the election procedures specified in this Resolution. All employee organizations who have duly submitted petitions which have been determined to be in conformance with Section 1 of Article II shall be included in the ballot. The ballot shall also reserve to employees the choice of no representative. Regular and temporary employees employed in positions within the designated appropriate unit who were so employed during the pay period which ended at least fifteen (15)days before the date the election commences, shall be entitled to vote in a representation election. Regular and temporary employees who did not work during such period because of illness, vacation or other authorized leaves of absence, and who are employed by the District in the same unit on the date of the election shall also be eligible to vote in a 105W9 vz 7 representation election. An employee organization shall be formally acknowledged as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the designated appropriate unit following an election or run-off election if it received a majority of all valid votes cast in the election. In an election involving three or more choices, where none of the choices receives a majority of the valid votes cast, a run-off election shall be conducted between the two choices receiving the largest number of valid votes cast. The rules governing an initial election shall be applicable to a run-off election. b. Within 30 days prior to an election, the District's Employee Relations Officer will present to the agency conducting the election, and the applicable employee organization(s), a list of eligible voters in the appropriate unit for which the employee organization(s) has made a satisfactory showing of interest. The eligibility list will be kept current by the District during the month before the election and a revised eligibility list will be presented to the applicable employee organization(s)and the agency conducting the election on the day(s) of the election. Either the District or the employee organization or organizations participating in the election may challenge any name on the list of eligible voters, Including the revised list, at any time, up to and including the day(s) of the election. No challenges to the eligibility list may be made after the election has concluded. The agency conducting the election shall determine who is an eligible employee and its decision shall be final and binding. C. Election ballots shall offer eligible employees a choice between representation by the employee organization or organizations involved, on the one hand, and no organization, on the other. The ballot question shall read as follows: "Do you want [insert name of employee organization] to act as your exclusive representative: Yes_ No " The question will be repeated where more than one employee organization will be on the ballot. The question will be followed by the question, "Do you want no organization? Yes_ No .11 d. There shall be no more than one representation election under this Resolution for each designated appropriate unit, excluding run-off elections, in a 12-month period. e. Costs of conducting elections under this Section shall be bome in equal shares by District and by each of the employee organizations appearing on the ballot. f. The election will be held on the District's premises at a time and on the date selected by the Employee Relations Officer for the election, or by mail ballots, in the discretion of the Employee Relations Officer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employee Relations Officer and petitioning employee organization may agree to a different election date so long as it is consistent with the employees' rights to choose their representative and there is a reasonable basis for such stipulation. 105689 v2 8 g. The agency conducting the election shall also be responsible for maintaining the voting site, the ballot box and tallying the votes at the conclusion of the election day(s). The conducting agency shall certify the results of the election to both parties as soon as it has counted the ballots. h. If it is determined that an Employee Organization has received affirmative votes from a majority of the eligible employees casting ballots in an appropriate unit, the Employee Relations Officer shall so report to the District's Board of Directors at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Upon receiving such a report, the Board of Directors shall certify the employee organization as the Exclusive Representative for the unit in which the election was held. Once such certification is given, it may only be withdrawn If the Exclusive Representative subsequently loses a decertification election or if the District has a good faith belief that the Exclusive Representative no longer enjoys majority support from eligible employees in the unit in question. SECTION 5. PROCEDURE FOR DECERTIFICATION OF EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION a. A decertification petition alleging that the incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization no longer represents a majority of the employees in an established unit may be filed with the Employee Relations Officer. A decertification petition may not be filed within one (1) year after a valid election in which the challenged Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization appeared on the ballot, whether for decertification or certification. A decertification petition may not be filed during the term of a valid Memorandum of Understanding except during the open period preceding the expiration of a Memorandum of Understanding. The open period shall be the thirty(30)day period commencing one hundred fifty (150) days and ending one hundred twenty(120) days prior to the expiration of a Memorandum of Understanding. A decertification petition may be filed after a valid Memorandum of Understanding has expired. A valid Memorandum of Understanding shall not serve as a bar to the filing of a decertification petition for more than a three-year period. A decertification petition may be filed by an employee or an employee organization(s), shall be accompanied by proof of employee support, and shall conform to the extent possible to the requirements for a petition for recognition under Section 1 of Article II. b. The Employee Relations Officer shall Initially determine whether the decertification petition has been filed in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Resolution. If, in the judgment of the Employee Relations Officer, the decertification petition does not meet the requirements set forth in this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the petitioning employee(s) or employee organization. The petitioning employee(s) or employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition for decertification or may appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer 105689 v2 9 a pursuant to Article II, Section B of this Resolution. If the decertification petition satisfies the requirements of this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer shall so advise the petitioning employee(s) or employee organization and shall give written notice of the petition to the challenged Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization. C. If a decertification petition satisfying the requirements of this Resolution is filed, the Employee Relations Officer shall post notice of election to occur on or about thirty(30) days after notice of the decertification petition is given pursuant to subparagraph (b) hereof, to determine the wishes of unit employees as to representation. A decertification election shall be conducted by secret ballot. The ballot shall offer employees eligible to vole the choice of no representation. Only those regular employees eligible to vote for the certification of an employee organization shall be eligible to vote in a decertification election. If the challenged incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization does not receive affirmative votes from a majority of the eligible employees voting, that employee organization shall be decertified, and the unit shall not be represented by an employee organization until such time as a new exclusive employee organization is recognized pursuant to this Resolution. d. A petition for decertification of an incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization may be combined with a petition for certification of a new Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization. A decertification election held pursuant to this Section may be combined with an election for certification of a new Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization held pursuant to Article II Section 4. However, no new exclusive employee organization may be recognized to represent an appropriately designated employee unit unless, by majority vote, the regular employees who vote in said unit, vote to decertify the incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization. If, pursuant to this Section, a different employee organization is formally certified as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization, such organization shall be bound by the terms and conditions of any Memorandum of Understanding then in effect for its remaining term. SECTION 6. POLICY AND STANDARDS FOR DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE UNITS a. The policy objectives in determining the appropriateness of a unit shall be the effect of a proposed unit on (1)the efficient operations of the District and its compatibility with the primary responsibility of the District and its employees to effectively and economically serve the public, and (2)providing employees with effective representation based on recognized community of interest considerations. These policy objectives require that the appropriate unit shall be the broadest feasible grouping of positions that share an identifiable community of interest. Factors to be considered shall be: 105659 Q 10 4 ARTICLE III. ADMINISTRATION SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF CURRENT INFORMATION BY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS a. All changes in the information filed with the District by an Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization under items (a) through (g) of the recognition petition under Section 1 of Article II shall be submitted in writing to the Employee Relations Officer within fourteen (14) days of such change. b. The District shall allow a reasonable number of employee representatives of an Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits when formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the District on matters within the scope of representation. SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PROCEDURES If the meet and confer process has reached impasse as defined in this Resolution, either party may initiate the impasse procedures by filing with the other party a written request for an impasse meeting. The impasse request shall contain a statement of the parties' position on all issues. An impasse meeting shall be scheduled promptly by the Employee Relations Officer. The purpose of such meeting shall be: a. To review the position of the parties in a final effort to reach agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding; and, b. If the impasse is not resolved, to discuss arrangements for the utilization of the impasse procedures provided herein. SECTION 3. IMPASSE PROCEDURES Impasse procedures are as follows: a. If the parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation the dispute shall be submitted to mediation. The mediation proceedings shall be private. The mediator shall make no public recommendations, nor take any public position at any time concerning the issues. If the parties agree upon mediation, all costs of mediation shall be bome in equal shares by District and by each Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization participating in the mediation. b. If the parties do not agree on mediation or the selection of a mediator, or having so agreed, the impasse has not been resolved, and unless prohibited by law, all issues shall be submitted to the District's Board of Directors for its determination and such action as it, in its discretion, deems to be appropriate in the public interest. The action by the District's Board of Directors shall be final and conclusive. 105689 vz 13 4 ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION This Resolution shall be administered and construed as follows: a. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to deny to any person, employee, organization, the District or any officer or other representative of the District, the rights, powers and authority granted by Federal or State law. b. This Resolution shall be interpreted so as to carry out its purposes as set forth in Article I. SECTION 2. REPEAL OF PRIOR RESOLUTIONS The provisions of this Resolution shall supersede and take precedence over the provisions of any prior Resolutions, minute orders or statements of policy, adopted by the District's Board of Directors, dealing with the same subjects and matters as are covered herein, including, but not limited to Resolution No. OCSD 98-34. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Resolution, or the application of such provision to any persons or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Resolution, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION The Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby directed to certify to the passage of this Resolution and thereupon and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. SECTION 5. GRANDFATHER CLAUSE District recognizes that the following employee organizations have been elected pursuant to majority vote of the employees in and for the following units: l05M Q 14 e Orange County Employees Association - Administrative and Clerical Unit - Technical Services Unit - Engineering Unit International Union of Operating - Operations, Maintenance and General Engineers, Local 501 Services Unit Supervisory and Professional - Supervisory Management Unit Management Group - Professional Unit District grants Exclusive Recognition to such employee organizations for said units until such status is changed pursuant to this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this day of , 19 Chairman, Board of Directors Secretary, Board of Directors 105689 v2 15 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT for the Fiscal Year ended June 30th , 1999 Orange CountySanitationDistrict, 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 r r r Prepared By: Department of Finance r Accounting Division Michael 0, White, CPA r Controller r u u u u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) u U u u U u U u u u u r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents r For the Year Ended June 30, 1999 paw INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letterof Transmittal..................................................................................................................... t GFOACertificate of Achievement................................................................................................ bl Boardof Directors........................................................................................................................ x OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... A Mapof Service Area..................................................................................................................... xi FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors'Report....................................................................................................... 7 Combined Financial Statements(General Purpose Financial Statements): Combined Balance Sheets.................................................................................................. 4-5 Combined Statements of Revenues. Expenses, and Changes in RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... 6 Combined Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................. 7 r Notes to Financial Statements............................................................................................. 8-25 Required Supplementary Information—Impact of Year 2000(Unaudited).................................. 26 Combining Financial Statements: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 28-29 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses,and Changes in RetainedEarnings............................................................................................................ 30-31 Combining Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 32 r STATISTICAL SECTION(Unaudited): Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years.......................................................1......................... 33 ,.i Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................... 34 Properly Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years.............................. 35 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property- rLast Ten Fiscal Years .............................................................................................................. 36 Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments- LastTen Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 37 PrincipalUsers............................................................................................................................. 38 Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses—Last Ten Fiscal Years....... 39 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 40 Bond Coverage-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 41 r Demographic Statistics- Last Ten Fiscal Years.......................................................................... 42 Property Values and Construction-Last Ten Fiscal Years......................................................... 43 Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the Orange County Sanitation District................................................................................. 44 rInsurance in Force....................................................................................................................... 45 Comparison of Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses-Last Ten Fiscal Years............ 46 Biosolids Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................ 47 r Miscellaneous Statistics............................................................................................................... 48 r w u u u u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 'u IuI u u u u u u u u u OCSD Introductory Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999 �� -� 0 a s R O t -t N i' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 10, 1999 e� "7141962-2411 ..mng.dde..: The Board of Directors of the P.0. Box m27 Orange County Sanitation District, nancaln valley,M Orange County, California 92728-8127 alaort address: Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the Orange County Sanitation 344 nl1$QV,CA District, Orange County. Californiafor the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. This report includes the Fduntain vaster. ue 9 tY• Y P 92708-7018 financial position and activity of the nine individual Revenue Areas, as described within the Governmental Structure below, as of June 30, 1999 and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the District's Finance Department. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, Age„eniies including all disclosures, rests with the District. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed a data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial Vein. position and results of operations of the District All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the District's financial activities have been included. Anaheim Bred Buena Park The report presented herewith consists of three parts: (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of LNIEaa transmittal, a Governmental Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement, a listing of the Board Iwntem Valle, of Directors, an organization chart, and a map of the individual revenue areas; (2) a financial section Fullerton consisting of the independent auditors' report, general purpose financial statements, and combining canted B H•,dtingtan Beath statements of the individual Revenue Area Funds; and (3) a statistical section consisting of pertinent Irvine financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information about the District. Le Habra La Palma Loa Manilas Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and VewPart Beath functions controlled by the District's Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting o-a^se Standards Board Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity". For the u Platedua W g ty". purpose of this Santa Ana evaluation, control was determined by the Board's responsibility for: (1) adoption of the budget and user Seal Beach charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are started Teen. described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. Vida Park ywba bne. t ate of orange GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE 9.4¢ery District. The Orange County Sanitation District encompasses the Northern section of Orange County. The District provides wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering 471 square miles and serving a caste Mesa population of 2,386,000, or approximately 86 percent of the County's population. The District was NbCway Cary originally incorporated in 1954 as nine separate public corporations, or districts. In April of 1998, the W.t.r District. Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of h-nn.Ponca; these nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District, effective July 1, 1998. This action was recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and auditing processes. The boundaries of the nine previous districts will remain intact for the purpose of -To Protect the Pubhc Health and ma Enmmnma^t through Fmeflence in Wastewater Systems- collecting sewer user fees, at the previously established rate schedules, and will be referred to as Revenue Areas. The District is managed by an administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the agencies or cifies which are serviced by the District. Each of the nine Revenue Areas has its own budget and is responsible for the construction and maintenance of its own collection system. All Revenue Areas, except Revenue Areas 13 and 14, receive their own share of the one-percent ad valorem property tax levy. In addition, all Revenue Areas except Revenue Area 14, collect user fees from property owners. Revenue Area 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The purpose of the District's wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency. The District sewerage system includes approximately 650 miles of sewers that convey wastewater generated within the District's boundaries to the District's two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd). Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50 percent of the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. u Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined and discharged to the ocean off the I ' Huntington Beach coast through an ouffall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five U miles long. The last mile of the ouffall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet. u ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK Orange County represents one of the major economic centers in the state and nation. If Orange County u was a nation, its economy would rank 3r among all countries in the world. The Anderson Center for Economic Research at Chapman University estimates its Gross County Product at$104.9 billion for 1999, up five percent from the prior year. In 1998, jobs in Orange County increased by five percent, or approximately 61,000 jobs, almost double that of the overall U.S. growth of 2.6 percent. The relatively rapid pace of Orange County's job growth is I reflected by the fact that 1998 marked the third consecutive year that it outpaced job growth nation-wide. u Orange County job growth is also increasing significantly faster than all other counties in California, and by more than 50 percent over Santa Clara County — home to most of Silicon Valley. Most of the job ' 1 growth in Orange County is attributable to high-tech and other durable manufacturing employment, u Including engineering and software development, telecommunications, medical Instruments industry, and information technology. The Irvine Spectrum alone is home to more than 2,000 companies employing almost 45,000 workers In fields ranging from biotechnology to clothing design. The real gross domestic product in Orange County for 1999 is projected to replicate the prior year's 3.9 percent growth before steadily dropping to 2.6 percent In 2000. Growth in total building permit valuation in i the county is forecasted to hit 20 percent this year before dropping back to a still strong growth rate of 10 percent in 2000. These projections by Chapman University call for a $4.1 billion of total building permit valuation in 1999 and $4.5 billion In 2000, exceeding the previous high of$4.2 billion reached In 1988. 11 r r Because of a tight housing supply and high demand generated by strong job growth, upward pressure on housing prices will continue at double digit rates in 1999 before dropping back to 7.6 percent appreciation in 2000. Recent statistics from the Real Estate Research Council suggest that housing prices in Orange County, unlike other Southern California counties, have finally recovered all the losses incurred during the first half of the 1990's. r The District implemented a five-year rate schedule in May 1997 that provides for gradual increases for four of the nine Revenue Areas through 2001-02. The two Revenue Areas in need of the largest adjustments voted to extend their increases over a ten-year period beginning in 1997-98, a move r designed to ease the immediate impact of those increases on their residents. Pending completion of the new strategic plan, it is anticipated that three Revenue Areas will require no change in their sewer service user fees through 2000-01. Prior to this increase, the District had been operating without an increase in sewer service fees over the last five years by deferring the construction of new facilities and by reorganizing and streamlining operations which resulted in the reduction of actual staffing levels by 93 positions, or 14.9 percent of the workforce, primarily through attrition. However, rate increases became inevitable as the District's capital improvement and rehabilitation requirements and Certificate of Participation debt obligations grew beyond the District's ability to pay solely from property tax proceeds. In 1998, the District conducted an in-depth review of it's reserve policies. This review included a survey of the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 1999, the District's designated retained earnings totaled $376 million, and have been earmarked for the following specific purposes in accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy: r Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 74 million Designated For Self-Insurance 57 million ,r Designated For Capital Improvements 195 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 33 million Designated For Rate Stabilization 17 million Total Designated Retained Earnings $376 million r MAJOR INITIATIVES Strategic Plan r The District is currently undergoing a major strategic planning effort that will define goals, operational commitments and associated financial requirements for the next ten years. The strategic plan revises many of the assumptions used to develop the District's existing planning document, including the population and land use projections, the level of building activity within the service area and the volume of wastewater treated. The plan, which is expected to be completed in the Fall of 1999, will also provide an operations and r financial plan, including a review of the Districts collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and a study of the ocean outfall system. r Reinvention Based on an Operations and Maintenance(O&M)efficiency assessment conducted in the Spring of 1995, it was determined that an additional 16 percent reduction in personnel and technology costs would have r' to be achieved in order to become 'best in class'. Shortly following this assessment, a Districts Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed to involve employees in the implementation of iii I new work practices that would provide for the reduction in operating costs and increase the agency's efficiency to match that of the most efficient wastewater treatment agency. During fiscal year 1997-98, DART completed the DART Reinvention Report that contained the reinvention 1..1 and implementation plan components. The report includes DART's mission and goals and provides recommendations for changes in the following three areas. L� • Business practices, which are the philosophical tenets of the organization. The business practices describe"why"an organization performs functions in a specific manner. • Work practices, which are the policies and procedures (the -what" and 'how') developed by the L, organization to implement the business practices. • Reinvention tools,which are the support systems needed by the organization and employees to apply the business practices and work practices to their activities. V The following tasks were the focus of DARTs effort during fiscal year 1998-99: Information Systems Integration -The DART Implementation Plan identifies the need to link the financial L information system and plant automation system to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). To meet the identified need, a new planning and scheduling module for the CMMS has been purchased and is currently being tested. The module will be in production in 1999-00. Reinvention Training - Four reinvention training goals were established for fiscal year 1998-99. The DART Reinvention Concept workshops for O&M personnel were conducted in November and December I of 1998. Area Team training scope and consultant hiring was completed in the third quarter of 1998-99. Lj Technical training requirements to broaden the skills of O&M personnel have been identified and were implemented in the fourth quarter of 1998-99.- The Planning and Scheduling training will be delayed until ) fiscal year 1999-00 to coincide with the implementation of the CMMS Planning &Scheduling Module. Area & Utility Team Implementation -The Area & Utility Teams are preparing to support the Reinvention Automation Project(J-42). The teams will be making improvement recommendations and reviewing plant documentation to support the automation project workshops. The teams' automation project input will focus on optimizing the plant processes through improved control systems. Asset Management Program - This program will develop a means to track equipment costs and use the u cost data to make improved maintenance decisions. It is the foundation upon which the Planning and Scheduling Program will be built Project Specialists are developing the managed maintenance criteria (such as cost centers, process crificality and lifecycle evaluation)and entering data into the CMMS. Warehouse & Purchasing - The Warehousing & Purchasing and O&M Divisions formed a user's group in 1998-99 to address issues associated with implementing new business practices. The user's group has I I been tasked with developing an O&M and Warehousing & Purchasing business and work practices 1.1 improvement plan. Completed in the third quarter of 1998-99, the plan identifies project objectives and the tasks that must be completed to align the new O&M business and work practices and the purchasing and warehousing process. Process Performance Measurement and Reporting - The changes in the maintenance program that are currently under way and the development of new information tools, such as the asset management data L warehouse, will result in an expanded performance reporting capability. The reinvention process will begin to return benefits in the fourth year and continue through year five of I the reinvention implementation process. Total direct and indirect implementation costs to be incurred during this five-year period are projected to be$3,219,400. Expected savings to be generated during this I L iv L r same time period, including one-time savings, total $6,510,000 generating a net five-year return of $3,290,600. Annual savings of$1,440.000 are expected to be generated thereafter. Saver Service Fees In 1997-98, the rate advisory committee, comprised of representatives from industrial, commercial, and r residential users, analyzed the Districts' rate structure to determine whether user fees are equitable among residences and industry. Their review resulted in a proposal to add several non-residential user categories that would be based upon the average flow and strength of wastewater discharged for that r property type. In June 1998, the Directors approved a revision of the sewer service user fee structure by expanding the number of non-residential categodes from one to twenty-three, and basing rates on average quantity and strength of discharge per category. The increase in the number of categories will allow for a more equitable fee structure and may also allow for future reductions in single-family residential fees. r SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS The District received the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies Gold Award for no discharge violations in 1998. In August 1999, the District received the 1999 California Association of Sanitation Agencies Public �+ Service Award (SARWG) for the agencies leadership and vision in the creation of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group, and in fostering the watershed management approach in solving water quality problems. SARWG specifically noted the achievement of public and private collaboration to address ,y nonpoint source issues related to dairy waste management, and its impacts on Orange County's water quality and supply. In September 1999, the District was awarded the City-County Communications and Marketing Association's Silver Circle Award for "Most Creative Program With Least Dollars Spent- for the District's public outreach efforts at the Orange County Fair. ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS r The District's accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the District's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting - controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and r judgments by management. We believe that the District's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Each year the District's Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. A joint works budget is first prepared that identifies the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the District during the year. Upon adoption, District's staff allocates the joint works budget proportionately to each of the individual Revenue Areas and obtains individual Revenue Area budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, or fund level. The District has adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. r v r ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the District,which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the District to determine that the costs L (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are I j evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital 64 expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the District's enterprise operations over the past two , fiscal years is as follows: IL'I, Amount Percent Summary of of Increase of Increase Revenues and Expenses 1998-99 1997-98 Decrease Decrease Operating revenues $67,428,617 $56,290,836 $ 11.137,781 19.79% Operating expenses, Including depreciation 91,855,501 85,706,557 6,148,944 7.17% Operating income(loss) (24,426,884) (29,415,721) 4,988,837 16.96% Non-operating income, net 32,818,175 40,746,355 (7,928,180) (19.46)% I Net income $ 8,391,291 $ 11,330,634 $ 2,939,343 (25.94)% u Operating revenues increased primarily because of the$11.1 million, or 19.76 percent increase in service L charges. The increase in service charges is primarily due to(1)the decline in user fee refunds from $6.8 million in 1997-98 to only $989,000 in 1998-99, and (2)the increase in the average sewer user fee rate of 3.2 percent over the prior year. W User fee refunds, which go back four years in most cases, are provided to commercial users who provide documentation that their actual usage was less than what was calculated by the District's square footage formulas. The establishment of more equitable rates by the rate advisory committee have begun to limit L the number and dollar amount of future rebates. However,the District will always be subject to rebates to those commercial customers who can establish that their actual usage in any one year was less than the amount that was calculated based on square footage and average use. �1 The 7.17 percent increase in net operating expenses is primarily attributable to the $6.7 million, or 18.6 percent increase in depreciation as $69.5 million of depreciable assets have been added to the balance sheet over the prior year. Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization has actually decreased by$500.000,or one percent, over the prior year. The 19.46 percent, or$7.9 million decrease in net non-operating income is comprised of a$6.5 million,or 13.82 percent decrease in nonoperefing income and a $500.000, or 2.66 percent decrease in non- operating expenses. The decrease in non-operating income includes a $9.96 million, or 35.7 percent decrease in interest revenues and a$1.55 million, or 4.95 percent increase in property tax revenues. The decrease in interest revenues is primarily attributable to the lower yields earned on investments over the prior year, down 2.26 percent over the prior to 4.89 percent,and to the one-time recognition of$1.5 million in earnings due to the increase in the fair value of investments that occurred in the prior year. The$1.55 million increase in property tax revenues is reflective of the current rebound in the real estate market as total assessed valuations have also increased over the prior year by 2.8 percent. The 2.66 percent decrease in non-operating expenses is primarily attributable to the decrease of $872,000 in Interest j vi Iu, 4 r expense over the prior year primarily due to the favorable decline in the month-to-month rates on the District's variable rate certificates of participation debt program. r DEBT ADMINISTRATION r At June 30, 1999, the District had a number of certificates of participation debt issues outstanding. These issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, totaled $372.7 million. The District has maintained its AA-rating from Standard and Poofs Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services. The District's "2020 Vision" Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan proposes a 50:50 mix of pay- as-you-go and debt financed capital improvements. In 1999-00, a $157 million of certificates of participation debt issuance is being proposed. A total of$760 million of debt financing is forecasted over the next ten years due to the $1,027.0 million in capital improvement requirements over the same time period. Debt Service requirements for 1999-00 are being proposed at$41.7 million, an increase of$11.3 million,or 37.2 percent from the prior year budget and projected amounts due to the additional certificates of participation issuance expected in the third quarter of 1999-00. CASH MANAGEMENT w The District's investment portfolio, except for the District's debt service reserves, investments with the State Local Agency Investment Fund, and overnight repurchase agreements of idle cash within the r District's general bank account, are managed by an outside money manager, Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO), who perform the daily investment activities, and by Mellon Trust, who serve as the District's independent custodian bank. This externally managed portfolio consists of a short w term investment pool of$18,801,000 at June 30, 1999 that has maturities out to 180 days, and a long- term investment pool of$301,965,000 that has maturities out to five years. Investments of this externally managed investment portfolio consist of U.S. Govemment securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Investments of the District's debt service reserves totaling$32.1 million consist of bank investment contracts of$27.7 million with Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank, maturing out to August 1, 2013, and$4.4 million in open-ended mutual funds. w Interest earnings for the year were $17,937,000, a decrease of$9,960,000 over the prior fiscal year total of $27,896,000. This reduction is primarily due to the 2.26 percent decline on the average yield on maturing investments to 4.89 percent from the prior year average of 7.15 percent, as investment balances remained fairly close between the two fiscal years. In addition, a one-time recognition of$1.5 million in earnings occurred in the prior year due to the increase in the fair value of investments. The decline in interest earnings is a general result of the overall decline in the market place as PIMCO met or exceeded all industry benchmarking requirements. w RISK MANAGEMENT r For the year ended June 30, 1999, the District was self-insured for a portion of workers' compensation and property damage. The self-insured portion for workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $300 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is $100,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside `+ insurance coverage to $65 million. The District also maintains outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from vii $25,000 to $100,000. The District is insured for general liability up to $25 million per occurrence with a self-insured portion of$100,000. District management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1999 that would 4 materially affect the financial position of the District. L INDEPENDENT AUDIT An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the District is conducted annually by independent certified public accountants. The District selected the accounting firm of Moreland & Associates, Inc., to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1999. The auditors' report on the District's combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report. This report renders an unqualified opinion on the District's combined financial statements for u the year ended June 30, 1999. CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for the Districts'comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1998. This was the fifth consecutive year that the Districts have received this award. In order to be awarded a h,I Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. �l ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lj This report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division staff, and I would like to especially express my appreciation to Julie Pritchard who assisted in its preparation. I would also like to thank the Districts Boards of Directors, the General Manager, and the Director of Finance for their interest and support in conducting the financial operations of the District in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, Iu' Michael D. White, CPA ( � Controller IYr F� viii r r Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting r Presented to r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers " Association of the United States and Canada to _- government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial r reports (CAFRs)achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. 3 xo \.../ C President o�'I4 Dare � R • (/�L Executive Director r r ix Ya I� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Board of Directors As of June 30, 1999 AGENCY ACTIVE DIRECTOR ALTERNATE DIRECTOR I Cities: u Anaheim Shirley McCracken Tom Daly I Brea Lynn Daucher Roy Moore u Buena Park Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall ` Cypress Anna L. Piercy, Tim Keenan Fountain Valley John Collins Laurann Cook Fullerton Don Bankhead Jan Flory Garden Grove Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater Huntington Beach Peter Green Dave Garofalo Irvine Christina Shea Greg Smith u La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian La Palma Paul Walker Kenneth Blake Los Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bales J� Newport Beach Jan Debay Tom Thomson ; Orange Mark A.Murphy Mike Spurgeon Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill Santa Ana Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz ICJ' Seal Beach Shawn Boyd Paul Snow Stanton Brian Donahue Harry Dotson Tustin Thomas R. Saharelli Jim Polls Villa Park Russell Patterson Richard A.Freschi Yorba Linda John M. Gullizson Gene Wisner Samtary/Waler Districts: y Costa Mesa Sanitary District James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry Midway City Sanitary District Joy L. Neugebauer James V. Evans Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A. Swan Darryl Miller County Areas: Member of the Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith Yrl 1� lei y X U r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Organizational Chart June 30, 1999 r mama r uRecroM cexww awewxmuxr r MMrow omu U®Elbl EWERILMWbW r � wwxwReemRm evmw wwwnw oMTRnom\ nwwlex CEItlYNGTr MEb0.0YFe RXMIET mlNw\ TIGNLYDTI Iw111OCWG \WNCw WONCpIIM eeYP10I111b r wwwEunr M XuxM XxwEe aebTwmmew IxrMwnax exTbexE\ mwlew wdxwm rowxmunw MnuRcw roMlxmanax roxwrdXnM eeexmwM wxxxwEe ewmu bMxmu� ._ ErnTYee rowwmarwx rowxmumx roxwemana eanimMun r eoamer rocdwnm murc cwrouwE R.weeu wwnwwdnw ommlro dP4TORf n1elYT. Mrl'MR {NRIe[Ilpq EpMpIMCC\ gPIX\ REReiMY ppxTENt\ WMMi W.IOiWEXO PMNW ' YXIIIB11I.11R � WN[IIOYT:C ILWCIMAYTw MeePMP4W RIw111M1 YNPdwURM Ce101RYCnwI MaxnouxET \wRMMa eRw.R.xmro xldrco wMbeMeM rvEreMe YMER.R*oar MaeM xartm.e Eunice r xeec�uW TwMnoM awWm MCMMIVL 6Ve1Y\ MNMWUMC dNAEWEY r RCWXq . . [IeCTEEIL\ pxnNYOR�MI \IMIIIH4VIL9 Ep11XN e[11WI.Td1 r aROWIIY\ CM1CW . MEMI\ xll r r V r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Map of Service Area June 30, 1999 r LOS ANGELES COUNTY �e LA HABRAry_ BREA �yry ELL RTON Y-Im wu,..xx 13 -' l I.1 VA" , PLACENTIA LINDA 9�F 9 J ow aenw xvc _ 2 `r�OF 9 LA UE A 5 PALM ux PA E N P CY RE S NAH IM VILLA O LOS STANT N """"` PARK 0 LAMITO 6 O RANGE 3 G cxwwx.vE ' G _ g GARDEN I - GROV STMI ST SE nrxn _ B red v O TUSTIINN - - u Fo 11 sr 11 a SANTA 14 ANA „ F UNTA VALLEY PACIFIC ` OCEAN HU N BEACH I BEACH x i O ro RECLAMATION All PLANT NO. 1 COSTP� IRVINE -. MESA TREATMENT a°� PLANT ONEWPORT N BEACH 1989 r 9 b � � All r r r r r OCSD Financial Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999 r r 'r r iw r r r r i l �� ^j^11• I ram'^ Y' R, 3 I r 1201 DOVE STREET,SUITE 660 ��//�� � ���_//�� �� // NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660 _ Moreland &,Wdj0!%&We,*, e.Y t& (94%W 4025 1 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 570 RANCHEROS DRIVE,SUITE 260 SAN MARCOS.CA 92069 (760)]523390 September 10, 1999 The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Independent Auditors'Report We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the Orange County Sanitation District, California (District) as of and for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, as listed in the table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the District's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall combined financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the District as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and cash flaws for the years then ended in Conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated September 10, 1999, on our consideration of the District's internal Control over financial reporting and our tests of its Compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts. Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the Combined financial statements of the District taken as a whole. The year 2000 supplementary Information on page 26 is not a required part of the Combined financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We have applied certain limited procedures,which Consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However,we did not audit the information and do not express an opinion on it. In addition,we do not provide assurance that the District is or will become year 2000 compliant,that the District's year 2000 remediation efforts will be successful in whole or In part, or that parties with which the District does business are or will become year 2000 Compliant. The accompanying combining financial statements listed in the table of Contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the Combined financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the Combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information listed in the table of contents was not audited by us and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon. 1 u l� V L (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 1�If lei 2 r/ .j rl s ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT -- COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS r rl .s u v by u ..i 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT twd Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 1999 and 1998 u.f 1999 1998 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents(note 2) $ 21.101,780 $ 25,263.084 Investments(note 2) 198.876,239 163,927,804 Receivables: Accounts,net of allowance for unccllectibles 3,999,091 4,020,760 Accrued interest 4,379,724 5,680,898 L Due from other governmental agencies 90,167 Total receivables 8,378,815 9,791,825 h Inventories 4,817.568 4,394,025 N Prepaid and other assets 813.903 307,187 Total current assets 233,988,305 203,683,925 Restricted assets: Cash and cash equivalents(notes 2 and 4) 14,994,859 46 :Q ' Investments(note 2) 141,320,842 137,81953. Receivables: Accrued interest 522,258 538,821 Connection fees 1,427.960 2,061.775 Due from other governmental agencies - 158,000 Other 855.755 859,312 Total receivables 2,805,973 3,617,908 Total restricted assets 159,121,674 187,636,242 �• Due from other governmental agencies, noncurrent(note 11) 88,340.640 88,340,640 Deferred charges 1.945,236 2,069,024 Property, plant and equipment, at cost(notes 3 and 8): Land 7,140,674 7.140,672 Sewage collection facilities 315.363,531 319,653.231 Sewage treatment facilities 574,647,470 513,729.012 Sewage disposal facilities 90.094,215 81,830,012 General plant and administrative facilities 103,209,892 98637,497 Contruction in progress 130.968,813 156:142,014 Total property, plant and equipment 1,221,424,595 1,177.132,438 Less accumulated depreciation 417,865,344 376,288,552 Net property, plant and equipment 803,559,251 800,843,886 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 11,428,783 12,086.492 Other assets, at cost, less accumulated amortization 1,009,298 2,921,047 to Total assets $ 1,299,393,187 $1,297,581,256 (Continued) See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 4 .r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Balance Sheets (Continued) June 30, 1999 and 1998 r 1999 1998 Current liabilities payable from current assets: Accounts payable $ 6,998,462 $ 5,593,293 Accrued expenses 2,706,182 5,326,423 Other 2.213 Total current liabilities payable from current assets 9,704,644 10.921,929 r r Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: . _ Retentions payable 2,220,285 2,457.571 Interest payable 4,513,730 4,710,258 Deposits 2,639,643 1,817.146 ...- Claims and judgments payable, current portion (note 4) 525,428 429,603 General obligation bonds payable,current portion(note 4) - 15,000 Certificates of participation payable,current portion(note 4) 12.880.000 12,105,000 Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 22.779.086 21.534,578 .r Long-term liabilities: -- Compensated absences(note 4) 3,237,800 3,065,600 Claims and judgments payable, noncurrent portion(note 4) 937,888 1,002,408 Arbitrage payable(note 4) 303,500 Certificates of participation payable, noncurrent portion, net of discount(note 4) 359.854,634 372,653,677 Deferred revenue 80,408 80,408 Total long-term liabilities 364,414,230 376.802,093 r Total liabilities 396.897,960 409,258,600 Fund equity: Contributed capital (notes 5 and 8) 246,276.971 241.153.400 Retained earnings 656,218,256 647,169,256 Total fund equity 902,495.227 888,322,656 Total liabilities and fund equity $1.299,393,187 $1.297,581,256 rr See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 5 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 1999 1998 Operating revenues: Service charges $ 67.017,670 $ 55,961464 Yr� Permit and inspection fees 410,947 329272 1 Total operating revenues 67.428,617 5S1290,836 �I Operating expenses other than depredation and amortization: Salaries and benefits 4,811,246 4,131.704 Utilities 2,900 434.588 Supplies 6,392 91,713 Contractual services 1,537,793 1,166,566 Directors'fees 74,169 91,606 Meetings and training 5,617 6,357 Repairs and maintenance 3,140 138,774 t Joint operating expense allocation,net(note 6) 42,458,381 43.211,557 ,Vr Other 464,215 592,620 Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization 49,363,853 49,865,475 v Operating income before depreciation and amortization 18,064.764 6,425,361 I{ Depreciation on contributed facilities - 72,036 L Depreciation on other facilities 41,833,939 35,111,337 Amortization of excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 657.709 657,709 Operating loss (24,426,884) (29.415.721) Non-operating revenues: Property taxes 32,836.628 31,287,109 Interest 17,937,293 27.896.829 Other 2,050.759 2,124,182 Total non-operating revenues 62,833,680 61,308,120 Non-operating expenses: Interest 18,359.361 19,232,169 Other 1,658.144 1,329,596 ` I Total non-operating expenses 20,015.505 20,561,765 -ieF n Net income 8,391,291 11.330,634 Add depreciation and amortization related to contributed equity (notes 5 and 8) 657,709 729,746 Net increase in retained earnings 9,D49,000 12,050.379 .� Retained earnings, beginning of year 647,169,256 635.108.877 Retained eemings,end of year $656,218,256 $647,169,256 See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements, 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 1999 1998 r Cash bows from operating activities: Operating loss $ (24.426.884) $ (29,415,721) Adustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation 41,833.939 35,183,373 --- Amortization 657,709 657,709 Other non-operating revenues 2,060,759 2,124,182 Other non-operating expenses (1,632,356) (1,235,955) (Increase)decrease in assets: Accounts receivable 21.669 9.877,911 ti Due from other governmental agencies 248,167 2,412,318 Other receivables 3.657 (724,088) Inventories (423,543) 6.626 r, Prepaid and other assets (506,716) (143,587) Other assets,net of amort¢ation 1,911.749 (609,450) - Increase(decrease)in liabilities: Accounts payable 1,405,169 (2,763,560) Accrued expenses (2,316,741) 299,179 _ Retentions payable (237.286) 794,486 Deposits 822,497 (1,104,145) r Other liabilities (2,213) 2,213 _ Compensated absences 172,200 250,800 Claims and judgments payable 31,305 (876.470) r Net cash provided by operations 19,722,981 14,735,821 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: r Proceeds from property taxes 32,835,628 31,287,109 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Additions to property,plant and equipment (44,549,304) (48,768,893) Interest paid,net of amounts capitalized (18,474,932) (20,007,881) -- Principal payments on certificates of participation (12,105,000) (11,305,000) Principal payments on bonds (15,000) (15,000) Proceeds from capital contributions 6.416,095 3,550,031 Net cash used for capital and related financing activities (68,729,141) (76,546,743) . . Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of investments 967.079.676 1,727,641.475 r Purchases of investments (1,005,529,423) (1,755.107,009) Interest received 19,255,030 27,257,178 Net cash used for investing activities (19,194,717) (208.356) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (35,365,249) (30,732,169) `. Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 71,461,888 102,194,057 ._ Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $ 36,096,639 $ 71,461,888 r See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 7 m ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 I 1 Y� (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity u As of June 30, 1998 the organization known as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) included the operations of nine separate Districts operating within the County of Orange, ! California. In April of 1998, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution u No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District. This action was recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and auditing processes. Effective July 1, 1998, the organization became known as the Orange County Sanitation District L (District). All assets, liabilities, and equity of the Districts were assumed by the newly formed District. The boundaries of the nine previous districts have been maintained for the purpose of collecting sewer user fees at the previously established rate schedules; consequently, the District is currently comprised of nine separate revenue areas. The District is managed by an administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the Agencies or Cities which are serviced by the District. The District owns and operates certain sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County, California. The District utilizes joint operating and capital outlay amounts to pay joint operating and construction costs of each revenue area. These joint costs are allocated to each revenue area based on gallons of sewage flow. The District is independent of and overlaps other formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the District's jurisdiction; however, financial information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board " (GASS)Statement 14: J • Each entity has an independently elected governing body. • Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. • The District is neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. • Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. l ' Basis of Accounting The District operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are rj financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily ` through user charges. L Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues (Continued) 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred. -- Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year end. The District applies all GASB r pronouncements currently in effect as well as Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements and Interpretations,Accounting Principal Board Opinions and Accounting Research Bullefins of the Committee on Accounting Procedure issued on or before November 30, 1989. r Operating Plans --. Each year, District staff prepares an annual operating plan which is adopted by the Board of Directors. The annual operating plan is used to serve as a basis for monitoring financial progress, ^• estimating the levy and collection of taxes, and determining future service charge rates. During the _ year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operation dictate. Cash Equivalents Investments with original maturifies of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Investments All investments are stated at fair value (the value at which a financial instrument could be . - exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale). .. Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in first-out basis. r Property. Plant and Equipment Outlays for property, plant, equipment, and construction in progress are recorded in the revenue r area which will use the asset Such outlays may be for individual revenue area assets or for a revenue area's share of joint assets. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor, materials; outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period. There were no capitalized interest costs during the fiscal years ended June 30. 1999 and 1998. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The District generally follows the guidelines of estimated useful lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 75 years. The following are estimated useful lives for major classes of depreciable assets: Sewage collection facilities—50 years, Sewage treatment facilities —40 years, Sewage disposal facilities—40 years, and General plant and administrative facilities—11.5 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged r directly to contributed facilities. _. Amortization Amortization of the excess purchase price over the book value of assets acquired is provided using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 30 years. r (Continued) _- 9 L' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT II ; Notes to Combined Financial Statements v�r June 30, 1999 and 1998 L+ Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates(note 4). Restricted Assets Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates of participation,joint treatment works expansion,and capital expenditures for improvements. Interest Rate Swaps ) The District enters Into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of certificates of participation as part of an overall financing program, These interest rate swaps are accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is 1 I accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap L agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements. Compensated Absences The District's employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation J i and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and : hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave" at a rate of between 60 and 200 hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the i accompanying financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences." In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the District assumes that all employee's accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out. 1 Claims and Judgments art The District records estimated losses, net of any Insurance coverage under its self-insurance program (see Self-Insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been incurred and when the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable includes an estimate for incurred but unreported claims. , Property Taxes Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July n 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. lY�, The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the District in installments during the year. Property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance current operations. ` The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at L time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The ) District receives a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 period. (Continued) 10 U rn/ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r Self-Insurance Plans For the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, the District was self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' _. compensation Is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other .. perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $300 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is $100,000 or 5% per unit of insurance,whichever is greater,with outside insurance coverage to$65 ,r million. The District also maintains outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The District is substantially self-insured for general liability coverage. During the past three fiscal years there have been no settlements in excess of covered amounts. There were no significant changes in insurance coverage during the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. District management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1999 that would materially affect the financial position of the District. .. _ Claims against the District are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but ,... not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. - Contributed Equity 'r Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend _ existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect. Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. Deferred Compensation Plan r The District offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the District to defer a ,r portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until termination, retirement,death or for unforeseeable emergency. During the year ended June 30, 1998, the plan was amended so that the assets of the plan are r held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. Since the plan assets are administered by an outside party and are not subject to the claims of the District's general creditors, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 32, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans, the plan's assets and liabilities are not included within the District's financial -- statements. Eliminations and Restatements As a result of creating a consolidated entity, inter-district receivables and payables which were r. originally reported within the June 30, 1998 financial statements have been eliminated. Similarly, all fiscal year 1998-99 inter-district receivables and payables have been eliminated and are not r' (Continued) 11 d ti ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30. 1999 and 1998 reported within the June 30, 1999 combined financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year data to conform to the current year presentation. M (2) Cash and Investments The District follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held 5 I by fiscal agents. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated to the L various funds based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest income from cash and investments of funds excluded from pooled cash and investments is credited directly to the related fund. Deposits Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the L bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation. The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by pledging government securities equal to 110% of the deposits or by pledging first trust deed L mortgage notes equal to 150%of the deposits. Deposits are categorized herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board 1 j (GASB) Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at �+ year-end. Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the District or by its agent in the District's name. Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or agent in the District's name. �,rt Category 3- Uncollaterelized or collateralized but the pledged securities are not held in the District's name. Restricted investments, as classified on the balance sheet, are in reserve funds held by Chase Bank and State Street Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 4). At June 30, 1999 and 1998, these reserve funds were limited to investments in money market mutual funds and to deposits within bank investment contracts (BIC). Although the BIC with State Street Bank is 60 classified as Category 3, as shown below, the depositor, AIG Matched Funding Corporation, is required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract � if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities of AIG falls below a S&P rating of"AA-" or below a Moody's rating of"Aa3". Investments Statutes authorize the District to invest in obligations of the U.S. Govemment, state and local governmental agencies, negotiable certificates of deposits, bankers acceptances, commeroiat paper, reverse repurchase agreements, and a variety of other investment instruments which are 1 allowable under the California Government Code section 53600 at seq. Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASB Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at year-end. (Continued) 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the District or its agent in the District's name. Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institution's trust department or agent in the District's name. Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institution's trust department or agent but not in the District's name. The District invests in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1999. the District's total demand cash bank balance amounted to $968,889, of which $658,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. Investments Not Subject to Categorization Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASS Statement No. 3 does not require ,r categorization of investment pools managed by another government Also cash held by trustees are not categorized because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open-ended — mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the District who are acting in accordance with agreements entered into with the District All such investments are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by the GASB. - The management of LAW has indicated to the District that as of June 30, 1999 the amortized cost of the pool was$36.849,505,673 and the fair value of the pool was $36,801,515,428. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities or similar products in the form of - structured notes, totaling $1,524,350,000 and asset-backed securities totaling $351,942,000. LAIF's(and the District's)exposure to risk(credit, market or legal) is not currently available. ` A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 1999, is categorized as follows: June 30, 1999 Carrying Amount Bank Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category _ Demand cash accounts $ (414,202) 310,889 2 Bank Investment Contracts- -with Chase Bank - 4,482.935 4.482.935 3 -with Slate Street Bank 23,227,WD 23,227,00D 3 Total Deposits 41( 4,202) 27,709,935 28,020.824 Investments: v Repurchase agreement 558,000 - 3 - Cash and investments with LAW 14,770.093 8,345,691 N/A Cash and investments with OCIP 5,673 3.770 N/A .., U.S. Government Securities 133,175,698 75,249,572 1 Commercial Paper 6.210,824 3,509.363 1 - Corporate Bonds 65.304,394 36,899,580 1 Mutual Funds 266,641 150.606 N/A s Cash and investments held with fiscal agents: -- Mutual funds 4,447,184 N/A Total Investments 220,392,221 128,605.788 Total Carrying Amount $219.978,019 158,315,701 (Continued) 13 fr ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $ 21,101.780 14.994,859 Investments 198,876,239 141,320,842 $219,978,019 156,315,701 At June 30, 1999, the U.S. Government Securities investments included mortgage-backed securities totaling $62,361,449, and the U.S. Government Securities and Corporate Bond investments included floating-rate notes totaling $38,441,361. d A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 1998 is categorized as follows: June 30. 1998 1 Carrying Amount BankMMM Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category Demand cash accounts $ 858,086 (1,736,352) 503,589 2 Bank Investment Contracts- -with Chase Commerce Bank - 4.482.958 4.482,958 3 -with State Street Bank 13,813.498 13.813,498 3 Total Deposits 658, 16,560.104 18,800,045 Investments: Repurchase agreement 3,158,000 - 3 Cash and investments with LAIF 9.239,402 5,390,730 WA Cash and investments with OCIP - 6.206 WA U.S. Government Securities 126.025,114 117,453,595 1 Commercial Paper 2.562,912 1,495,333 1 Corporate Bonds 48.647,374 28,324,970 1 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents: Mutual funds - 14,787,398 WA Total Investments 188,532,802 167,458,230 Total Carrying Amount $189,190,888 184,018,334 Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the June 30, 1998 combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $ 26,263,084 46,198.804 Investments 163.927.804 137.819,530 $189,190.888 184.018,334 At June 30, 1998, the U.S. Government Securities, Commercial Paper, and Corporate Bond investments included asset-backed securities totaling $32,491,064. and the Corporate Bonds investments included floating-rate corporate notes totaling $25,646,068. At June 30, 1998, the District's total demand cash bank balance amounted to $3,661,589. of which $3,158,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. The management of LAIF has indicated to the District that as of June 30, 1998, the amortized cost of the pool was $31,920,000,841 and the estimated fair value of the pool was $31,932,227,970. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities or similar products in the form of structured notes totaling $977,100,000 and asset-backed securities totaling$388,537,000. (Continued) 14 u ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r (3) Property, Plant, Equipment and Construction in Progress ,r Property, plant, equipment,and construction in progress, at cost, at June 30, 1999 and 1998 are as follows: Property, Plant and Equipment r 1999 1998 Revenue Treatment Collection -- Area Plant Facilities Total Total s 1 $ 86,894,516 7,054,233 93,948,749 84,580,307 2 233,024,296 97,692,455 330,716,751 305,647,559 3 241,486,219 71,216,544 312,702,763 292,012,553 5 31,655,177 34,423,171 66,078,348 63,034,919 6 28,991,098 5,278,131 34,269,229 31,620.754 7 81,331,302 42,936,097 124,267,399 114,409,820 11 51,008,485 19,230,748 70,239,233 68,545,321 13 9,324.069 3,175,032 12,499,101 11,128,034 14 20,124,896 25,609,313 45,734.209 50,011,157 783,840.058 306,615,724 1,090,455,782 1,020.990,424 Construction in Progress 1999 1998 .. Revenue Treatment Collection Area Plant Facilities Total Total 1 $ 10,848.613 53,503 10,902,116 15,779,389 •+ 2 27,878,518 2,086,220 29,964.738 41,474,175 _ 3 27,954,738 12,284,195 40,238.933 45,618,989 5 4,018,696 4,902,446 8,921,142 7,628.943 6 3,216,331 6,683,516 9,899,847 8,063,160 7 8,278,515 3,925,677 12,204,192 15.669,322 - - 11 5,311,169 7,979,993 13,291,162 16,422,993 13 835,164 - 835,164 1,314,441 14 1,823,267 2,888,252 4,711,519 4,170,602 - 90,165,011 40,80 3,802 130,968,813 156,142.014 Total property, plant and equipment $874,005,069 347,419,526 1,221,424,595 1,177,132,438 r r (Continued) _. 15 r f� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4 Notes to Combined Financial Statements r+ June 30, 1999 and 1998 I Yr (4) Long-Term Debt The following is a summary of the changes in long-term debt for the year ended June 30, 1999: ' t Balance Balance �I July 1, June 30, 1998 Additions Deletions 1899 Arbitrage payable $ - $ 303,500 It - $ 303,500 Compensated absences 3,065.600 172,200 - 3,237800 Claims and judgments payable 1,432,011 31,305 - 1,463:316 General obligation bonds 16.000 - 15,000 Certificates of participation 386.240.000 - 12,105.000 374,135.000 1 ' Totals $390,762,611 $ 607,005 $12.120.000 $379,139,616 L Arbitrage Payable V The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act) substantially revised the treatment to be afforded to the eamings on the proceeds of tax exempt debt and requires the District to calculate and remit i rebatable arbitrage earnings to the Internal Revenue Service. Certain of the District's debt and y interest earnings on the proceeds thereof are subject to the requirements of the Act. The Districts liability at June 30, 1999 is$303,500, Compensated Absences 60 The District's policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources. The District's liability at June 30, 1999 is$3,237,800. Lit Claims and Judgments Payable L The District is self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1. The following is a summary of the claims and judgments payable as of June 30, 1999 and 1998. 1998-99 1997-98 Claims and judgments payable at July 1 $ 1,432,011 $ 2,308,481 Claims incurred during the fiscal year 619,588 (498.450) Payments on claims during the fiscal year (588,283) (378,020) Claims and judgments payable at June 30 1,463,316 1,432.011 A� Less: current portion (626.428) (429,603) Total long-term claims and judgments payable $ 937,888 $ 1.002.408 L General Obligation Bonds f 1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at 1°/were paid in full in January 1999. L1 The District's liability at June 30, 1999 is zero. (Continued) Lrt 16 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 Certificates of Participation The District issues certificates of participation in order to finance construction of the treatment ^+ facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest In the semi- annual interest payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available funds of the District, All of the District's certificates of participation are 25-year issues except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issue. Certificates of participation at June 30, 1999 are summarized as follows: 1900-1992 Series A Certificates of Padicipalion $ 85,800,000 1990-1992 Series 8 Certificates of Participation 21,815,000 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 88.400,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 133.770,000 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 44.350.000 - Total certifictes of participation payable 374,135,000 „d Less: current portion (12,880,000) Less: unamortized discount (1,400,366) Total long-term certificates of participation $ 359,854,634 r 1986 Certificates of Participation On August 13, 1986, District Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of$117,000,000 of certificates of participation. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasence. - 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation r On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The ,r weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 2.9%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate Irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 16, 2000, _ unless terminated earlier. The District has the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium. 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation On May 1, 1991, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $117,555,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 5.9%. Annual principal — payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an original Issue discount of$3,731,496. V (Continued) r 17 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i Notes to Combined Financial Statements Vr+ June 30, 1999 and 1998 The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$4,482,935 is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2). In addition, Federel Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. On December 3,1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was 1 I refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of i+ Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. On September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was `y refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation On September 1, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98,500,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 2.9%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,850,000. which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2). December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation On December 3, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$160,600,000 1 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. ' On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55%and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing I agent on a notional amount of$160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for 6� as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 20-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013. The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 5 certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the District's combined financial .L statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt still outstanding at June 30, 1999 was$133,770,000. N (Continued) 18 WI ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 v The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$13,377,000 is being held by State Street Bank, the r trustee(note 2). In addition,AMBAC provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation On September 2, 1993. Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1995. r _. On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed Interest rate of 4.56% and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is r accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2016. The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the + 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the District's combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1999 was approximately$44,350,000. Annual Amortization Requirements The annual requirements to amortize all debt related to certificates of participation as of June 30, r 1999, including interest payments of$221,450,442, are as follows, Certificates Year Ending of 11 June 30, Participation 2000 $ 34,627.746 2001 34,738,246 2002 34,570,664 2003 34,931,404 2004 35,154.005 r Thereafter 421,563,377 $595,585.442 r (Continued) r 19 r I , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I Notes to Combined Financial Statements lid June 30, 1999 and 1998 L (5) Contributed Equity The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the years ended June 30, 1999 1 and 1998, respectively: capital Amortization I I contributions of from Irvine Excess Connection Capital Depredation Ranch Purchase Fees Replace- on Water Price Over 1 ' Revenue Balance at EameE ment Contributed Distnd Book Value Balance at Area No. July (Expereed) charges Facilities (note 8) (note 8) June 30 Fiscal Year Endino June 30.1999 1 1 S 5.953.135 $ 233578 $ - s - s - $ - $ 6.186.713 YI 2 55.108p47 4.074.689 141208 - - - 59.324.344 3 35.054213 2.734.075 - - - - 37,818288 5 14.830.643 178237 - - - 15,008,780 + ' 6 5.450,716 97.808 - - - - 5,548.524 Y 7 18,653,650 741.342 - - - - 19.395.002 11 14.532.189 308.777 - - - - 14,8411956 I 13 8,036,818 1,135,175 - - - - 9,171,993 .)4i 14 $3.503.679 (752jill (3,110,802) (657,709) 78.982,381 Tolals $ 241.153.400 $ 8.750.874 S 141.208 $ S (3.110.802) $ (667.709) S 246,2T6.Wl Ya Fiscal Year EMim June 30,1998 1 $ 6.272,M $ 116,043 S (435,685) S - $ - S - S 5,953,135 2 51.9its,917 4.238.987 (1,116,457) - - - 55,tOB,M7 L 3 33.237.958 3,150,283 (1,304.028) - - - 35.054.213 5 14.366,049 629,769 (166.275) - - - 14,830,543 6 6,354,329 297,621 (121.234) - - - 5,460,716 ] 19,140263 (25.176) (389,391) (72,035) - - 18,853,66o L 11 13,423,072 1,403,75E (294.639) - - - 14.532.189 13 7,384,120 697= (44564) - - - 8.036,818 14 85203,788 752,BW (238.827) (1,556,380) (667,709) 83.503.679 Toll S 236.3682Zn $ 11251,352 $ (4.180.100) $ (72.035) $ (1,556,380) $ (657,709) S 241.153.400 1�p�� (6) Joint Fund Expense Allocation ,jam. The District utilizes joint and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which are subsequently allocated to the revenue areas based on gallons of sewage flow. A I summary of joint operating costs follows: +V iL i� (Continued) L 20 L r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r 1999 1998 Revenue: Service charges $ 2,434.615 $ 3,564,837 Other 1,290,765 1,158,756 Total Revenue 3,725,280 4.713,693 r Expenses: Salaries and benefits 23.997,716 24,593.619 Supplies 4,691,395 5.638,556 Contractual 9.074.953 7,030,378 Repairs and maintenance 4,346,962 3,986,898 Utilities 3,317.113 2,893,535 r Other 755,623 3,882,165 Total Expenses 46,183,881 47,925,150 s, Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 42.458,381 $ 43.211,557 (7) Pension Plan The District participates in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System (OCERS), a cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan which is governed and administered r by a nine member Board of Retirement OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death, disability, and cost-of-living benefits. OCERS issues a stand-alone comprehensive annual r financial report which can be obtained from OCERS at 2223 Wellington Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92701. The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was$28,726,693 for the year ended June 30, 1999; $27,943,478 for the year ended June 30, 1998; and$27,918,636 for the year ended June 30, 1997. The District's total payroll was $32,675,487 in 1999; $29,684,325 in 1998; and $29,483,892 in 1997. w Benefits All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who refire at or after age 50 with r ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement allowance is based upon the members age at retirement, the member's "final compen- sation"as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. Contributions r As a condition of participation under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, members are required to contribute a percentage of their annual compensation to OCERS. r Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%-7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%, respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The District is required to make periodic (Continued) r 21 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ) Notes to Combined Financial Statements 61 June 30, 1999 and 1998 contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they refire. The contribution requirement for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997 were$3,576,050, $2,684,493, and $2,876,050, respectively. This total contribution consisted of $2,729,376 from the District and $846,674 from employees in 1999; $1,889,570 from the District and $794,923 from employees in I 1998; and $2,085,956 from the District and $790,094 from employees in 1997. The District's L� contributions represented 9.5%, 6.8%, and 7.5% of covered payroll and employee contributions represented 2.9%, 2.8%, and 2.8% of covered payroll for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively. The Distrcts contributions for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and u 1997 represented 3.98%,2.9%, and 3.2% of total contributions required of all participating entities, respectively. � 1 (8)Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District W Revenue Area No. 14 'I j The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the ICI Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD") as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement. IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 far an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per day), together with a pro-rata interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June I 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of $19,979,000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1999, $8,550,217 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book I value was amortized. U IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving L fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement, which contribution amounted to $3,110,802 in 1999 and $1,556,380 in 1998 (see note 5). The contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. Revenue Area No. 5 IRWD has entered into an agreement with the District to provide funding to Revenue Area No. 5 for the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal facilities to be used by IRWD (the "Downcoast Agreement"). No new funding occurred in 1999 or 1998. The agreement also provides that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees Yy related to development in the Downcoast Area(as defined in the Downcoast Agreement). (9) Segment Information L The District consists of nine revenue areas which provide sewerage services and are financed primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the revenue areas, in thousands of dollars, are as follows for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998: (Condnued) L 22 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r 1999 Depredation Net Property and Operating Net Change to Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (Loss) (Loss) Capital r 1 $ 2,094 $ 6,604 $ 4.090 $ (2,625) $ (2.098) $ 234 2 10,085 21,645 12.549 (6,355) Z912 4,216 3 10,976 21,810 12,385 (4,824) 6.249 2,734 5 2,903 2,637 2.242 (1,775) 1,219 178 6 1,337 3.632 1,424 282 1,964 98 7 3,164 5,870 4,585 (4,075) (1,138) 741 11 2,277 4.169 Z708 (1.830) 649 309 13 - 1,043 424 82 682 1,135 14 19 2,085 (3,304) (2,048) (4,521) r Total $ 32.836 $ 67.429 $ 42.492 $ (24.427) $ 8,391 $ 5,124 r Net Total Assets Due From Due to Additions (Including Due Other Other Net Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity 1 $ 4,052 $ 89,518 $ 840 $ 10.899 $ 589 $ 46,706 $ 29,939 2 12,341 389.481 6,768 2.063 57.565 122,772 258,956 3 14,673 390,080 4,885 3.321 92,844 116,606 263,902 5 4.318 89.879 299 1,041 15.482 20,884 65,469 8 4,513 62,214 4,865 991 23,835 15,922 44,134 r 7 5.480 127.310 466 5,765 13,995 25,604 94,008 11 (242) 90,784 2,565 4.665 9,210 23,633 61,322 13 757 24,419 148 747 1,985 292 23,228 r 14 (1,343) 66.736 10.193 1,537 8,778 1,716 61,539 Total S 44,549 $ 1.330,421 $ 31.029 $ 31,029 $ 224,283 $ 374,135 $ 902,495 r r r r (Continued) 23 r i d I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 49 1998 Depreciation Net Property and Operating Net Change to V Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (Loss) (Loss) Capital 1 $ 2,008 $ 5.696 $ 3,138 $ (2,732) $ (1,581) $ (320) 2 9,596 18,232 10,330 (7,345) 4,276 3.123 3 10,637 18,553 10,128 (5,796) 8,165 1,846 5 2,661 1,960 1,902 (2,400) 1,335 464 6 1,194 3,229 1,250 297 2,440 96 7 3,024 4,362 3,850 (5,333) (1,523) (487) 11 2,167 3,517 2,327 (2,181) 782 1,109 L 13 - 742 312 (71) 725 653 14 2.604 (3,855) (3,289) (1.699) Total $ 31,287 $ 56.291 $ 35.841 $ (29,416) $ 11.330 $ 4.785 I,.I Net Total Assets Due From Due to L Additions (Including Due Other Other Net Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total t Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity J 1 $ 6,622 $ 93,197 $ 840 $ 10,737 $ 225 $ 48,208 $ 31,804 2 12,235 385,590 6,768 237 52,104 126,872 251,828 3 17,010 384,084 4,885 2,177 89.669 120,251 254,918 4 5 3,141 87,827 299 1,144 17,039 21,687 64,072 6 295 60,146 4,740 991 23.264 16,395 42,072 7 11,016 127,931 466 4,928 14,440 26,454 94,403 L 11 4,373 91,163 340 4,781 6,486 24,306 60,364 13 862 22,616 148 611 2.079 300 21,411 14 (6.857) 72,269 8,657 1,537 6.110 1,764 67,451 I Total $ 48,697 $ 1,324,723 $ 27,143 $ 27,143 $ 211,416 $ 388,237 $ 888,323 (� L (10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures Revenue Area No. 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1999 and 1998 of $17,443,183 and $16,052,791, respectively. This deficit is expected to be eliminated by revised V service charges in future years. '' I 01)Contingencies LJ On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pools (collectively) filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. On May 2, L' 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division (Continued) 24 L r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1999 and 1998 r ('Bankruptcy Court"), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the Pool and Pool Participants. On May 15, 1996, the settlement agreement, as amended by the County of Orange Plan of Adjustment, was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The Settlement provided for the District to receive 'Settlement Secured Claims' against the County. The Settlement Secured Claims are secured by a first-priority secured interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered by the County from third party defendants. The District also received 'Repayment Claims'. The repayment claims are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries 'w by the County from third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an 'allowed' claim in the County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement. Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this litigation. A litigation fund has been formed by the pool participants with approximately $50 million available to pursue litigation. The District has recorded $88,340,640 as a noncument receivable on its June 30, 1999 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of investments in the Orange County Investment Pool. While collectibility, of the receivable from the County cannot presently be determined, it is the opinion of District Management that the effect of non-payment of the claims would not materially affect the financial position of the District. .r r r 25 r L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT L Required Supplementary Information(Unaudited) Impact of Year 2000 J The year 2000 issue is the result of shortcomings in many electronic data processing systems and other electronic equipment that may adversely affect the District's operations. The District's management and staff have given top priority to the District's plan to ensure that all of its computer systems will remain L operational in light of"Year 2000' concerns. The District's year 2000 remediation plan consists of an inventory and risk assessment of all systems, renovation and testing of systems, and implementation of updated systems where necessary, including interfaces with systems outside of the District. In addition,the District has developed a contingency plan that will be put into effect if unforseen problems arise. L In October 1998. the District began conducting an assessment of operational systems that affect the I delivery of sewer services to determine if they will be adversely impacted by year 2000 software failures. Li The assessment was completed in September 1999, and the District began testing operational systems in January 1999. The testing will continue through December 1999. The District believes that the operational systems should not be adversely impacted by year 2000 software failures. At June 30, 1999 the District had no material outstanding commitments related to the year 2000 assessment. In November 1998, the District began to assess the possible effects on its operations of the year 2000 readiness of its key suppliers and subcontractors. Most of the key suppliers and subcontractors have responded to the District's year 2000 questionnaires. Most have indicated they are in the process of making their own year 2000 preparations and adjustments. Additionally,the District has made reasonable inquiries in an effort to assess the compliance of those institutions responsible for transmitting debt service payments to the holders of the District's outstanding debt. All have indicated they are or will be year 2000 compliant. At this time, the District is not aware of any circumstances that would impede achievement of its year V 2000 remediation plan, nor does it anticipate that the cost of addressing the year 2000 issue will have a materially adverse impact on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. However, because of the unprecedented nature of the year 2000 issue, its effects and the success of related remediation efforts will not be fully determinable until the year 2000 and thereafter. The above description of the District's year 2000 remediation plan is not a guarantee those systems and equipment (including those of parties with which the District does business)will be year 2000 compliant � I H ll u u L {J 26 U V J 6 I �1 u 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS J r ' I V Li I u 27 MWE MUM SANITATION M ITUCT C.MnIn,Balance SI t June W.1B0 NAM Compereew TOM.Nr Jul1e W.1 MB Rawnue Ara. R.wnuo Ma. Revmun Mee Reumue Nee Rewnua Ma Rewnua Ma Rewnua Nee RevMlueNm Revenue Nas Randall No,I No led.3 Nos Nee NO.T No.11 No.13 No.14 Ended. 100 MM C.Aeeele: caMaMaeMequlvelem4 S M.771 S 4.040.142 5 6.60.26T i I,7113aM 5 1,820.457 s 1,7N,091 S 1.1134,513 $ 240.053 s ND 5 5 21,101.7m S M.2N.0N InwMne.le 8,791,00,11 4s,BB1,B00 81A15,a7 18JINNO 16.099.575 10,906.742 9,749,W0 2.2e2,410 Saw teal 163,1127A04 R.I.M. Aarenle 575A06 1,350.640 1,OT,MB INX2 111 .120 306,66E 329.292 40,N5 MAIN - 3.BBBA81 4.020,711D AOssasd n18resl 4NA79 I.3M481 1.313.017 172.123 177,617 4M.204 264.097 62.BB6 112.121 - 4X9.7G 5ABII.M Due SamoMerrewnueueee eMA49 9,7111127 4A54,00 20A11 4A84.70 All 2AMa0 MAN t0.M2,B40 (31,OM.5071 - - ouaM1ammmo,'wmmental Weidi li Toll lmdve9lm III'll 0,510,BW 7.2]6,6311 sm.W6 5a 'M 1218,M9 %I0,757 241MID toaM.M] (31,029A0T) 5a70A15 9.79"m lnwnbMe 513.03 1A10.700 IAN22I 18633o 195.503 480.010 Mg SB,2W 123.328 4.517,550 4A&A25 Pm id.MGMMmeeR 06.765 3S3,2M 244,1715 31,908 33,043 02,08 all BA4S MUM 813.B0 30,18T TOM..IaeeaM 12.20,327 81.810,M 98,912,398 18.554,725 25403,IN 2OAR020 14.21Q 7W 2.812,223 IOAM,eM (31100,197) 233.9M.W5 203tall ReaWcleS Moo. ceae¢ndduMequlvalanb 429.I93 6.2M.476 3AM,1M 1,1B7,MB 101,022 701,928 1a0A01 92211% M.N$ 14.09a.15% 46.196" InvmmrenM 4.060.06 S6.i10.132 30818,975 11,0011.505 852,OW Illi 12440,813 (101,342 51131.1141 141.320.11,12 137A19= Restaxalee: Ad.O.Nterete 83,478 10.02 176,535 24,730 9,472 21,916 13,426 - - 522.2" Nli Omnmtl.n lees 12AST 0421107 316.037 Mi 10,697 N.m 211,M6 68.502 - 1,42T,900 2,051,]]5 Due M1.m.Mm O.mmmi ,and. - - - I5%D00 ft., M90 276001 203.701 TOAD] wasps T7R10 BT,1M1 BSfi.T55 159Al2 TOM Onsou51n 1401223 1,112A90 1124.1173 141.344 58.213 14OA72 311,3111 89.502 2,1106,973 W7.901, Tola11u61Ued.... 4.60.01 55.052.587 38,20,01 12.315,695 1,10,33E 7A68,1102 13,001,670 B,B63.M0 6. 01.068 150,121A74 161,5435.242 owM1pm OMxeowmmmW ap4nUm.nondumnl B.Sa2,403 36,40A90 M,20.5,SBS 5,352,207 4.10,00 10.4113,915 8,515A53 3a72.190 1a113,013 BB.MOAW 0.340,1140 De1M1ed Ulagm 251,931 M9A0 05A1S 0S.7414 75.708 122,544 I20.733 ON 3A25 1.915,230 2A69.024 Proton'.plant and equipment,0WI: Land WAN 1.110.117 IMSA12 2M.00 155.1110 2.0D1,650 418.7p9 40,641 4MAW - 7,140,1174 7.140.672 Bmvae...Il..11an Indiana 8,830.M1 101503.881 70087,328 341930.019 61731.1% 42.11 £0M007 NNN5 M,07,513 - 315.30,01 318,853a31 3ow.9oaaeuns,"doill 0.720.10 170.004,233 171.11013E 23,222.300 21A63A72 M,MM340 37,400,253 BApM000 14,S38,071F - 574.8all 513720.012 Sma0o disposal adopted 9.991.782 M2BB.9W 27.7114.185 3,1142.6M 3337.123 9.352=3 6.Mi.517 1,070,913 2275.516 - BQ004,215 S1AM.012 Generelplenlend mminbm0ue Mcal5es Mill 22.702AM NATION 4,OH,60 3,7111.06 10M.147 6.404,617 4A54.794 3514,050 - 1Ma0,03 0.837,497 Cm.umanlnpmpma 10.902.110 29.984.73le 40.23090 0.921,142 9.890.047 12.204.18E 10281,18E 05,164 4711,610 IMMB.813 156.142.014 TOW prvpaM.Nanl and aqulpmml 10d.650.686 DBO.MI,4M 352.941,011 74.9111 M,109.070 1M,471A91 80530,395 103M?65 W.445,72e - 1.221.424.595 1.117.IUAN Leas w.umulebd deplatleX.n 36105A81 128,M. 90 IUMA13 21.470,200 12.70,820 47.946.182 21.857,BMt 3.60.181 12A0(1.750 417,805?4 378.2811553 Nalpmpe .plenlendeaulpmml W.7442M 231300AB0 225,1TM.1811 0.523,224 31AM.256 65."SADS 55.572.43E 0.649.OM 3Tp%= MA59,251 0WA43AB0 Eames pumNne pd.over 0o%I Wuameoweedemele 11A26.i53 11420.70 12JUS.AN O6wr ovals,at dust,lass acomulaldl amgrll2Mm S1A18 mm 2WM0 47AM am 10371 3MA91 2.220 4,721 109.20 2.921.047 Total asels $ WAIBAO S 3e9All $ 390.011D.178 S 0,079,170 5 82R10)03 S 127A10,297 S 110.783.539 S 24,419A0 S 0.738.08E S (3CO20,587) i 1.299.393.187 S 1.297.01.256 Icmlinued) I [ [ I I I I I I L I I I I I I [ I I OMNGE COUNTY SANITATION 015T CeminOp 9N�Sheet(Con0nue0) June]O Iw9 W lh CwnpveYw Tolela bl J ON W.18 W Rewnw Me Revenue Ma Rew eMe Revenue Aron Revenue Ma Revenue Me Revenue Me Rewnw Me Revenueyea EIealk," 9 No.l Nag Ne.3 No.5 No.O Ne.] Na.tt Na.13 Na.12 E.M. tan IBW Cu mIIBMIISee Neal.M1em mml eeeW: wA .pryeCle S 429.951 S I.M.nw 5 1.934A53 S 1.92e.M a 518.M a 467.918 S 244.e2e S I7.507 $ 1w,Bw S - E 8.998,452 3 5,593,M �e.panaea MIND 848,107 812.I0 I06,31MI tw.]w 275.016 I0}31 32.I39 69,269 - 2.706.182 5,328.423 Due to OM.nwnw area. 10"897 2.083,222 3.3x1.192 1.041,3W 99a.8w 5.7W.419 I.M.2w 747.205 tba8.5w (31.020,50) - MeI 2.213 Total cwen111eW15e. pexWle at.wnenl eum 11.517.M 4.251.798 611100,10 3,M2A20 11818.517 5A98,153 5,022,955 BZ]A51 1,700.533 (3t,028.5aD 91Tw,eN 10.021,929 Cumm111eb18 ea pgatee horn roaMgM eawb: RelenYonv peyable 137.147 WSW 72BA27 50.035 2a32N 151,0]8 (1 1e.7311 31,= - 2.2xQ285 2.457,571 lean tma0le 9w.7e0 1.047,125 1.479M1 211,13] 99.2103 215,58) MAN 917 5.M - 4.513.M 4710.251 DepaYN 41,57D 202.051 2091810 441114 38,025 159.555 310.539 I= 1,82e.685 - 2MM 1,81T.148 Qw..d)upmwla Mabls.amenlpn08n 55.700 164,805 157,521 W.WB 22.20 WARM, 31.792 8.3w 13A50 - 525.428 129,003 Generol.b4nmbenM MAIO.wmml peNeo 15.w0 C.NM.Ind WN nden Nyabb,cumml peNan 1,Bw.33B n.381.35] 3.885.518 110.911 M.187 901.958 72D,231 SIM w.w3 12.880.0M 12.I05.0w Taal umm111e HIM. p 01.1.neMUM mach. 2.525.795 G.N01215 04459A16 1,205A5e 923.031 11791,840 112e8,58B 31,81% 1,725,05 22.770.086 21.531.98 LOCNIp neblwe.: COn. dIt0ebaanaea 3N.Bw +.01s.Tw e70.0a 1n.1w wx3w 33zxw 198.Sw 39A00 BZBw - 3)ai,WO 3.ws.500 C M.vN Iuwmenb pryBble, nmlpoNOn U201 1Bn,t80 101,1w 10,BSB n2.910 W.wS w.B10 I1.N9 2e,010 - Me.. t001,b0 MlOapepryWb %90 1N.810 108.5)0 10.]N 2.810 9,3w qW0 - - - w35w CaNAubaolpeNtlpNw . pgeMe,nmumMpwllm. net WBWew. 44.9,11,079 1+],980,0)0 112,38a,Bw 19,95T,w2 15.152,]19 34.541).455 22.512,626) 281.830 11658016 -wn 359,BS ]]3,0MAN Dmenee nae n.eea 3x.iN WAS W.Iw Tebl tom team llWllltle. 45A38R10 110,413.220 113.W,854 M131,801 15.538.025 25.023.931 23102333 332.415 !JW265 3WAIC230 376,MNI T.llWllllles W.5R.231 130.525,239 120170."S W.Iw,73T 1S0)9,5]3 31=724 20401,877 1.191AW 5,Iw.BW 131.025,5871 30897,M 402NM FUM epully: C UMOAee®pIW 6.I53,713 W.M.3N VA18,2801 130w,700 5,510b24 1B?98w2 14.8W.M 9.171,983 7B,w3331 - 245,270.971 241.153.e00 RNelnW meeln9e (..0 uleM88omJ.) 23.752.018 1901631,751 23B,w3N2 50,48).053 M,Sw,B90 70,811.571 WABDIM 14A55512 (17,4Q,183) w0,218R50 N7.102H Total NM poly 29.aw.731 258.950.005 M.901,730 w.N8.133 II,1W,220 W,0w,5" 91,32+.882 23.227,6M 81,532175 w2.495.227 w0.M2.555 Ta4,III011me.and NM eOMry S wA15.Ow S 389,01,33n S 3w.w0.178 S 09,870,170 S 6224,103 S IVAm,207 $ 90,783.530 S 21,419.09 S nMA2 S P1.02359T) S +,2Be,aW,lp S 1,207.561.250 29 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Charente in Featured!Eamin, For th Year Ended June 30.1999 Wit Comperellve Tests for the Year Ended June 30,1998 Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area No No.2 No.3 No No 6 No.1 No. 11 No.13 No, 14 19% 1990 Operi revenues, Service clmrges E 6.561.226 S 21,424.524 $ 21.761.155 E 2,63g221 S 3,62Q402 S 5,810,848 S 4,156,386 $ 1,042,382 $ 519 $ 67,017.670 $ 55,%1.564 Permit and lnspeoll leas 43,010 219,844 48.745 2.910 5.863 59.09 12.124 210 18.764 410,947 329,272 Told l Operating revenues 61604.236 21.W.388 21,809,900 2,637,139 3,6U 265 5,070.317 4.168.512 1.042,597 19,283 67.428.617 58.290.835 Operating expenses other than depredation and amodionlon: Salaries and benefits 407.257 1.429,708 972.517 384,555 160.a8T 111) 2 517,359 7.579 62.442 4,611,246 4,131,704 Utilifies - 1,328 608 - - 322 107 - 535 2.900 434,568 Supplies 29 Soo 158 TO 40 5,222 no - - 6.392 91,213 Contractual sumoes 155,O77 550.459 397AU 93,628 52,921 161,437 91.845 9,241 25,953 1.531,193 1.168.556 Dlrect.a fees 3.613 11,266 28,981 2,000 3,233 8,547 1.167 2.452 8,930 24.169 91,606 Meetirga and training 150 1.435 2.657 117 145 335 54 121 702 5.617 6.357 Repairs and maintenance - - - 3,056 Ba - - - - 3.140 138,114 Joirloperefing expense allocation.net 4,530.591 13.269.281 12,728,511 1,671,110 1,692,655 4.330.358 2,594,246 512.152 1.129.258 42,458,381 43,211.557 Other 42.402 183,861 118,OQ 15.8% 16,060 47,272 24,939 4,602 10.118 484,215 592,020 Total operating expenses other than deprecia8on and amadizalion 5.139,119 15,453844 14.248.991 2.170,399 1.926.805 5,380,4% 3,2 gam 53Q351 1,231,996 49.383.853 49.St 475 Oporatin Moores(lose) Whose deprntctsfion and amortization 1405,117 6,190,524 7.560.909 466.740 1.705.460 509,861 878.626 506.240 (1.218.113) 18.064.964 6.425,361 Daprsoistion on COMnbuted lacililies - - - - - - - - - - 72,035 Depredation on other facilities 4,090.221 12,548,680 12,384.807 2,241.704 1,423.660 4,585.331 2,708,680 423,784 1.427,092 41.833,939 35.111,337 AnlodlSatlan of excess purchase price over book vatue on acquired assets 657,709 657,709 657,709 Operating Income(loss) (2,825.IN (6,358,156) (4,823.896) (1,274,964) 281.780 (4,075,470) (1,03Q03O 82,426 (3.303.514) (24,426.8841 (29,415.7211 (Continued) r= r- r- r r- r r- r I- r- r-- r- U- r U- r- r- F- t 1 I [ l 1 I I I I I I I I I I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combining Sentiment of Revenues.Expenses,and Changes In Retained Eamlrgs(ConBnued) For the Year Ended June 30,INS With Comparative Totals to,the Yee,Eread June 30,19911 Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area NO No.2 No.3 No,5 No.6 No.7 No. It No.13 No.14 log large Non-operating revenues'. Property taxes 2.094,159 10.04.774 10,976,171 2.903.119 1.337,171 3,163,786 2,276,449 - - 32,835,028 31,287,109 lonso d 878,107 5.661,357 6,072,421 1,338,814 1,054,333 1,082,888 1.235.087 804,620 9,888 17,937.293 27.890.029 Other 74,080 210812 208719 27.324 26,120 68,694 45,438 7,911 1,391,651 2,060,759 2,124,182 Total non-operating evemes 3,046,328 15,956,743 17.257,311 4,269,257 2,417,624 4,315,365 3,556 974 612.561 1,401,519 52,833.080 81,308,120 Noncperating expenses: Interest 2,448,243 8,270,731 6.751,560 1,050,361 652.767 1,146.730 957,799 10,592 61,585 18,359,361 19,232,169 Other 73,160 415.538 432.561 215,094 62,575 229,180 120,504 2,363 84.541 1,656,144 1.329,596 Total nomopeeting expenses 2,510A23 8.086,269 8,1B/,111 1,275,078 735.342 1,377,898 1.078.303 12,975 148,108 20,0t 5,S05 20.561,786 Nelincome gosq (2,098,201) 2,912,318 5,249.302 1,219.215 1,904,002 (1,138,003) 648.837 682,062 (2,048,101) 8,391,291 11,330.634 Add depredation and amor94egon related IOromdbuedequily - - 657709 657.709 729,745 Net In....(deaetise) In retained earnings (rooumuked de8dt) (2,098,2111) 2.912,318 6,240,002 1.219.215 1,064,062 (1,130,003) 616.637 662,062 (1,390,392) 9,049.000 12,060,379 Retained seminars (eccumueted deaoi0, beginning of year 25,850,219 198.719,433 219,634MO 49,241,43e 30,621,634 75,749.574 45,832,059 13,373,550 (16.052,7917 647,169,256 635.108,877 Retained earnings (an umulatedde9o9), e1M of year S 23,752,018 $199.631.751 S 226,083.02 3 50,480,1153 3 36,5115,698 S 74,611,571 $ 46,480.698 S 14,055,612 $(17.443,183) $ 656.218,255 3 647,169.2% 31 ORANGE COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICT Combining Slelemenl of Cash Flows For Me Year En0e6 June 30,1989 Wdh ComwlaOYe Tolels for%e Year En9a0 June 30,1NO Rashness Me Nmmw Area 9menue Hee Nerenue Ama Revenue Ma Berme Me Pawn Ma Rewmre Me Neremn Me Etlminebq No No,2 My less Noe No N0.11 No,13 Na 14 EMIn 'm INS CeM any hem g .Iles agivilea' Opaeli o. llmsl f I2.BM.tw1 1 16.358,1581 f p,B)Se9N i p,T)S,98a1 f M1,)ea f IT,m6g01 S I1.0M.03e1 f 81AM f 113w.5w1 S - S (3eeM.eael f (M.HS,]2q Ad..0h to reca'tlb by(used mmme Doss) Io rrelwmprovaeE eY lusea Nlapmimc Arnad.lion <,w0,2J1 12.510.680 13,381.807 3.201,IIN 1,02],BBO 4,565,331 x.Tp.6W <23.]61 1,I2],OB2 - e1,B33,939 35,1p3.3)3 Nnerr ryan-n 85],]09 - 667.709 w).)ea ONaron-pendoesse ses )N,pM 210$13 31N.)19 10.3N 78.120 90.p91 L5,A16 ],wt 1.39?wl - 2.OW.)5B 2.121192 OlMrssIdecalinpwpemn (58,136) (3]8,3p8) (38].BN) (21o.)i8) 1]bw% (332.51]) (BB,J181 R.3<5) (w,313) - I1,6R,3581 (1,235.855) Onveeu)aveeu m aaxty ncraume rewmro 080.152) 13B.2d3 58,651 e65(1 20,3M (BSR>t) I16m2) 69] 36.35 x?689 9.8]].911 ouehameurernevuluemees - 35 (ua,3a1) - R.x28.m - (1,Si6.3591 aB95,81e Oth hr...rporonmenlM apenoss 11.08 1?390 3;9t6 <.335 1,w6 6,Doe 1;W3 2W 16).<W - 2307 3,012.319 Olhry.bae adas Bs) vem) M,06m 12.251) M.a)91 6m MB 2 e - 3,65) (724.088) I hba iee (33.)25) (22e.359) 05O.N0]) (12.z51) (2z,5]51 (50.18) IO,NB (8.201) 20.OSB - (Q3.813) 6,636 Repaberd.ratol N 100.m Isubw1 (15o.80z) I19.Sw1 12?8ael 102.12]I IMUD ..wel (102ez) - .911.7. I1e9.5671 O6seay.mandmn Aces, n '1W,820 550,519 561,844 71,137 1w.W1 M8,151 130.530 30.e91 91.1)0 - 1.811,)K 1609.YW1 Inwem 18pnsa)m bdlube. rmimb pryeeb MSIM) (Seem xx,B3e ?892,512 3yo.", 08.89]I (xa0.n3) hx.]a5) p0.w81 - La5.1m (2.]81588) I1mu0es pries (236,]511 040.o32) (]lem3) M.523) (w.9J11 1250,1601 (302.823) 1(016") 1M."06) - 13.318.741l 293.179 Repot. mNe (BB,BBi) (ta8,831) Ial868 (32.]3% 1B),080 92.85) (87.367) (B,6]31 fnes81 - (02.07 ]w.ae8 Metob 1%454.4% 28.875 x8,&d 3p% 3.)32 92.139 S'ISSem ?m 831,8(1 - B113.i8] I1,Iw.1151 omwakMrmvausuws 101944 1.838Run t.la]IBM 1103,8W1 - 0.'BMI I118.IN, IA.bJ (1) P.a86M% - OngoeharM Izae) lead 10]31 1001 m 1nO 11501 IMI In) 12,2131 ;213 Cwnperede6easeum 6100 12.M 69,8W 0.100 30.900 (13,M% 62W I'm 3.Bm t)2,ZW 2560w CYMe erlpllrepmanla peyWb IB13) 12.T1 1].083 9M 1].900 19.708I 1]KI 1.8]0 159, 31.308 IBML]% NNeaMpavbeEb/(uNE lw)oeaelbnm Lima" 7,211.312 13.e92.6w1 1.8e405e 3.me.3w 101%610 I19m2361 slew 1]491W) 19TY1961 N,M5.021 Cash Kvs from mnuptell eirp mNnfps: ROwMhmn pr lY bses 2.094159 10.081."41 10.916,171 ;901119 1A3).1)1 3.161785 ;376,409 33.839.626 31,2e7,1CB LWBoyshml ohya rMNeE 0nennM aeln diM: AEiONvnlo ipmeM (<.w3.2K) (1;310.BSn ( .8M,12B) IeA161e8) (4,512,561) . .250) M;0 (]5],5)6) 1,3931 N .]O9,.a931 IdaedpebL.Waa-ra..D.Ip RAt).1 % R. 0,w ) 11,OS0]B11 (652. 1 0154. IM,60% (10,52% (01tm) (1%474,8 ) 8811 pmipelpymaeaemalbaof .nNpemn 1? e.o1 l4.099.) % 0.sma.8M1 law.usl (N];8t6) (NOW Iw3,58% 0.t0% lae.00% 01.m81 Rmlpel sil�aa (15, 4 - 15.00(1) RacwES I-caDel r'onUAulpns 252.9N 46eA.4M 28N.251 163.421 3W.]BB Mx.Yr1 ]82.]M ?x)1 B3] 13661E091 flM59B5 2550021 Not."iEW Ey lueM laB opldeMrelay"fnurc'egassamue 1]7010)1 118667.3181 01973R51 ROM.,1 1<sos.1T an31M 1602.ew1 4B50)3 06295151 1®.M1411 fm U6WS Cash Ibee Irom iMMeq Wivi mys: %ooaCs tmnlM vab durweMeNs 36.910.2w 292.m.BM SI4,92B.181 71,Bt1,B80 55,556,802 ea,3]0.)59 62.216.750 b,YilwB 17,986.919 - W7.M6I6 1.727.641.173 Ivnws.sd inmstmeme I37,90aA5% IM0.09).5M) (M.371.71% (M,9e9,5W1 IS6.M9.66B1 (69A82.093) (65.25S66% CM37bw7) 115.183.4941 - (1.005.536423) 11)55.107.0091 Iran®,rMivq I0N.100 5.058.655 0.aM,8B2 1,3W,553 1.007.567 1.ffi.957 1.355.665 O'Dw gum 19.261.OM 27357.118 Ndwnpe.itleagWeeelml 6M4sp mdiveee MI.M1 110156.0e01 18943 IM1.tb1 9N.311 2= I1676a 11W9.w4I 2JIN I 11919m.]1)1 IM6.3561 Nn immwe(eevawe)m oMaM osh pwrekMe (4A54.62C) (11,522,2Y1) (10.018.31% (2.0I3W) (1,SN.3Ot) (2,A 0761 I1.9)4.630) 1?Y!B (4T 231) (35.306249) (30132.169) LYhtlq UnepMekMe.6p1"alYBV 58171M UOD&W 21164.7ea JOINT INS. 4HIJI95 4318 ?1$rn 1017M 714?YB 10319mo5] LeM uM nMRe-p-weMds,eMWyaer S 1.M3.581 f IIA)).617 f IUIO410 f 2.01.100 f ;021.079 f 2,495.019 f 2.3 916 f 1.182.M9 S U5.405 3 - f 350 09 f ]i.L81.0M OCSD Statistical Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999 r r r ' o a+ u d N i0 Y Y � f/1 l0 Y H ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Sim.= $90,000 $80.000 $70,000 Most], $50,000 S40,000 $30,000 $20.000 S10,000 1999.90 199691 1991-92 1992-93 1990­94 1994-95 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 /Opemorg Expense ONon Opemft E"nse Operating(1) Non-Operating Personal Maint& DeprB Total Interest Total Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Operating Expense Other Non-Oper. 1989-90 $ 19.170 $ 5,578 $ 19,224 $ 17.726 $ 61,698 $ 9,368 $ 1.048 $ 10,416 1990-91 24.170 5,483 20,711 23.520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 1991-92 26,757 5,920 20,416 23,346 76.439 11,825 2,405 14,230 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27.950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 1993-94 28.886 4,589 21,599 33,988 89,062 16.964 2,414 19.378 1994-95 29.399 3,180 27.369 34,087 94.035 23.941 826 24,767 1995.96 32.660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20,731 7.648 28.379 1996-97 31,523 3.744 22,851 35,284 93,402 21.237 1,497 22.734 1997-98 28,725 3.328 22,526 35,841 90,420 19,232 1.330 20.562 1998-99 28.809 3.320 20,960 42,492 95,581 18,359 1,656 20,015 (1)-The individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses,which,for the last seven _ fiscal years,were as follows: Personal MalntB DeprB Total Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Operating 1992-93 $ 24,660 $ 6,740 $ 18,923 $ - $ 50.323 1993-94 24,715 4,042 18.870 - 47,627 1994-95 25,861 2,630 22.791 - 51,282 1995-96 27,410 2,392 22,247 - 52.049 1996.97 27,194 3,073 20.339 - 50,6D6 1997-98 24,594 2,893 20.438 - 47.925 1998-99 23.998 3,317 18,869 - 46,184 Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. 33 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT �r Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years .. Smoot) r $90.000 $75,000 $60000 $45.000 - P. $30,0DD $15,000 $- 1989-90 1990-91 INI-92 1992-93 1993-91 199,195 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99 ■Operating Revenue ■Non-Operating Revenue ■Conldbute Capital Operating Revenue Non-Operating Revenue Permit 8 Federal 8 Net Service Inspection Property Capacity State Contributed Fiscal Year Charge(1) Fees Taxes Rights Interest Grants Other(1) Capital 1989-90 $ 23,009 $ 1,241 $ 31.122 $ 1,242 $ 18.993 $ 2,070 $ 1,887 $ 94,132 199D-91 39.712 7,429 33,395 1.172 17.279 64 3,496 15,683 1991-92 56,155 322 34,053 1,815 22,593 2,053 5,499 12,898 1992-93 71,568 456 31.054 2.228 27,569 18 3,419 9,486 L. 1993-94 73,400 540 35.854 - 33,226 - 8,751 13,471 1994-95 72.909 240 27,286 - 18,500 204 4.204 21.431 1995-96 71,362 120 29,285 - 20,209 - 4,224 4,209 1996-97 64,923 258 28,193 - 20,958 - 3.390 21.830 1997-98 59,517 329 31,287 - 27,897 - 3,283 4,785 1998-99 69,453 411 32,836 - 17,937 - 3,352 5.124 (1}The individual revenue components include a breakdown of the joint operating revenues,which,for the last seven fiscal years,were as follows: Operating Non- _ Revenue Operating Service Revenue .,. Charge Other 1992-93 $ 1.999 $ 1.740 1993-94 2.492 2.301 1994-95 2.617 2.032 1995-96 3.034 1,156 1996-97 2.652 1.023 1997-98 3,555 1,159 1998-99 2,435 1,291 Source:Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division. 34 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years ase $100.000 !� $90,000 �1r $BO,OIq $70,M $60.000 $50.000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $ 1989-90 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 OTolal Tax and User Fee Levy ■Total Tax and User Fee Collection Current Total Tax %of Total Tax Tax and Percent of and User %of Total O/S Delinquen- and User User Fee Levy Delinquent Fee Collection Delinquen- ties to Tax Fiscal Year Fee Levy Collection Collected Collection Collection to Levy ties Levy 1989-90 $ 47.900 $ 45,024 94.00% $ 729 $ 45.753 95.52% $ 2,532 5.29 % 1990-91 72,180 68,841 95.37 845 69,686 96.54 2,774 3.84 1991-92 85,172 79,329 93.14 1.637 80,966 95.06 5,067 5.95 1992-93 92,926 86,511 93.10 2,152 88,663 95.41 5.465 5.88 1993-94 92,728 88,335 95.26 5,722 94,057 101.43 3,255 351 1994-95 91,562 86,294 94.25 2,239 88,533 96.69 2,942 3.21 1995-96 91,844 90.479 98.51 586 91,065 99.15 1,710 1.86 _ 1996-97 89,794 82.123 91.46 246 82,369 91.73 2,191 2.44 1997-98 90,953 78.881 86.71 12 78,873 86.72 3,039 3.34 1998-99 98,557 92,089 93.44 1,597 93,686 95.06 2,069 2.10 Source:Orange County Auditor-Controller's Of0ce. 35 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (Dollars in Millions) Last Ten Fiscal Years r 140,000 120,000 100,000 r 80.000 00,000 40,000 - 20,000 1989.90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 199596 1996-97 1997-98 1998-N ■Se..d Property Assessed Value OUrsewred Property Assessed Value .. Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals Estimated Estimated Estimated Ratio of Total Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed to Fiscal Year Value Value Value Value Value Value EstimateclValue 1989-90 $ 98,750 $ 98,750 $ 4.422 $ 4.422 $ 103,172 $ 103,172 100% r 1990-91 109.048 109,048 3,575 3,575 112,623 112,623 100 1991-92 116,450 116.450 4,473 4,473 120,923 120,923 100 r 1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,887 4,687 127,197 127,197 100 1993-94 124,016 124.016 3.963 3,963 127,979 127.979 100 1994-95 123,525 123,525 3,871 3,871 127,396 127,396 100 r 1995-96 122,524 122,524 3.372 3.372 125,896 125,896 100 1996-97 122,304 122,304 3.247 3,247 125,561 125,551 100 r 1997-98 125,018 125,018 3,302 3.302 128,320 128.320 100 1998-99 131,295 131.295 3,394 3,394 134,689 134.689 100 r Source:Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office. 36 r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments r (per$100 of asessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years r r Fiscal Year IM-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993.94 199445 199698 1999-97 1997-98 1998-99 Basic 1%Levy 1'00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 .a Orange County No. 1 Bond 15R Fund-1951 0.00024 - - - - - - - - - Orange County No.3 Bond MR Fund-1951 0.00039 - - - - - - - - Orange County No.5 ,r Bond 13R Fund-1951 0.00041 - - - - - - - - Orange County No.5 Bond ISR Fund-1951 - - - - - - - - - - r Orange County No.11 Bond ISR Fund-1951 0.00008 - - - - - - - - Bond 18R Fund-1958 0.00021 0.00015 0,013012 0.00013 0.00019 0.00019 0 OOD19 0.00010 0.00010 0.00020 Total 1.00133 1.00015 1.00012 1.00013 1.00019 I M019 1.00018 1.00010 I M010 1.0002D r r r r r r r r r Source:County of Orange Auditor-Controllers Office. r 37 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Principal Users For the Year Ended June 30, 1999 r Dean Foods Knolls eeM 15% Kimberly Clerk Farm .16% .75% Sundor .16% Rockwell .19% AERA Energy .21% Adohr Farms _ Disneyland .52% .28% Favorite Foods .30% MCP Foods .42% Percentages of Total Service User Service Chimes Charge Revenues Kimberly Clark $ 518,458 0.75% r, Adohr Farms 358,870 0.52% MCP Foods 291.377 0.42% i. Favorite Foods 208,902 0.30% Disneyland 193,851 0.28% AERA Energy 144,871 0.21% Rockwell 134,148 0.19% Sundor Brands 110.108 0.16% " Knotts Berry Farm Foods 109.216 0.16% Dean Foods 100,716 0.15% r $ 2,170,517 3.14% fJ r r Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. 38 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses Last Ten Fiscal Years 70.0% eo.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% AM 20.0% MEN 10.0% 0.0% x_ 1999490 19 91 1991.92 1992.90 199194 1994.95 199596 1995-97 1997-9a 199a.99 Ddlan In Tnnusands Total Operating Expenses Ratio of Debt Service Total Debt Exclusive of to Total Operating Fiscal Year Principal Interest Service Depr.d Amort Expenses 1989-90 $ 2.593 $ 9,368 $ 11,961 $ 43,972 27.20% 1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50,363 23.93 1991-92 3,335 11.825 15,160 53,091 28.55 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04 1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59 1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 55,298 63.49 199596 10,180 21,298 31,478 57,561 54.69 1996-97 10,680 20,463 31,143 54.443 57.20 1997-98 11,320 20,008 31,328 49,865 62.83 1998-99 12,120 18,475 30,595 49,364 61.98 Source:Orange County Sanitation Distdcfs Accounting Division. 39 led ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt June 30, 1999 L 1998-99 Amassed Valuation(Land B Improvements Only): $123,159,446,707(after deducting$11.529,481,052 redevelopment incremental valuation) I Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt (Based on redevelopment adjusted all property assessed valuation of$129,687,234,736): V %Applicable Debt 6130M Orange County Teeter Plan Obligations 74.57D% $ 97,183,353 Metropolitan Water District of Southern Calitoms 15.198 87,849,759 L Irvine and Saddleback Valley Unified School Districts 99.975&11.248 1,497.753 Buena Park and Centralia School Districts 100. 7,367,978 City of Anaheim 99.051 8.766.014 City of Irvine 100. 3.430.000 Other Cities Various 1227,025 Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement Districts Various 299.938.492 Water Districts 93.776-100. 12,664.540 Yorba Linda Library District 95.525 28,958 Orange County Assessment Districts 100. 140.857.212 City of Irvine 1915 Act Bonds 100. 596,130,D00 City of Tustin 1915 Ad Bonds 100. 72.885,000 Other City 1915 Ad bonds Various 33,892,000 I I Bonita Canyon Community Facilities Dutrd No.98-1 100. 45,000,000 LI Irvine Unified School District Community Facilities Distinct No.86.1 99.996 114,380,425 Orange County Community Facilities District No.874 99.BW 79.732,434 City of Placentia Community Facilities District No.89-1 100. 26,845,000 Other Community Facilities Districts Various 153,701,990 L Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt $1,783,357,933 Direct and Overlapping Other Debt: %Applicable Debt 6GO/99 Orange County General Fund Obligations 74.570% $ 1313,8 22.506 Orange County Pension Obligations 74.570 232.153.864 Orange County Transit District Authority 74.570 10,808,922 Coast Community College District Certificates of Participation 99.051 17,160,128 South Orange County Community College District Certificates of Participation 34.210 16,345,538 I Brea-Olinda Unified School District Certificates of Participation 97.767 33,338,547 L Santa Ana Unified School District Certificates of Participation 100. 25,607,830 Orange Unified School District Certificates of Participation 96.211 11,425.056 Other School District Certificates of Participation Various 25,262,912 I City of Anaheim General Fund Obligations 99.051 725,756,138 L City of Fullerton General Fund Obligations 100. 45,044,880 City of Huntington Beach General Fund Obligations 99.981 47,848.913 City of Irvine General Fund Obligations 100. 72.115000 City of Santa Ana General Fund Obligations 100. 149,526:707 Other City General Fund Obligations Various 149.546,822 Orange County Sanitation District Certificates of Participation 100. 374,135,000 Irvine Ranch Water District Certificates of Participation 98.607 56699025 , Orange County Water District Certificates of Participation 99.227 187:841:672 I Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Facilities Corporation 72.051 49,794,446 L Other Special District Certificates of Participation 100. 2,900,13 Total Direct and Overlapping Other Debt $3,047,163,906 Less: Orange County Transit District Authority(60%self-suppomng) 8,647,137 Canis County Water District Certificates of Participation(100%self-supporting) 187,841,672 u City of Anaheim self-supporting obligations 677.168,152 Other City self-supporting obligations 3.144.599 MWDOC Water FaciRss Corporation(100'/e self-supporting) 49.794,446 j Total Net Direct and Overlapping Other Debt S2,120,567,800 Lr Gross Combined Total Debt $4,630,651.839(1) Net Combined Total Debt $3,903.955,733 (1) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes,revenue,mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and iron-bonded capital New obligatioro. 1 Ratios to: Land and Improvement All Property L Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation Total Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt 1.32% N/A Combined Direct Debt ($374,135,000) 0.30% 0.29% U Gross Combined Total Debt 3.92% 3.72% Net Combined Total Debt 3.17% 3.01% STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 650/99: $31.841,161 Source: Calffomia Municipal Statistics. 40 L' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Bond Coverage Last Ten Fiscal Years 5.00 A /.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 5o 00 0.50 0.00 Dollars in Thousands 0 1989 W Ill ■1991-92 01992-93 ■1993-M 0199495 ■l 0199697 01997-98 D199899 Direct Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements Gross Operating Avail.For Fiscal Year Revenue(l) Expenses(2) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage(3) 1989-90 $ 79.563 $ 43,972 $ 35,591 $ 2.593 $ 9.368 $ 11.961 2.98 1990.91 102.548 50,363 52,185 2.396 9.654 12.050 4.33 1991-92 122,489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11,825 15,160 4.58 _ 1992-93 132,573 54,096 78,477 6,075 11.799 17,874 4.39 1993-94 146,979 50.280 96.699 11.990 16.964 28,954 3.34 1994-95 118.695 55,298 63,397 9.670 25.439 35.109 1.81 1995-96 12l.010 57,561 63,449 10.180 21.298 31.478 2.02 1996-97 114.046 54,443 59.603 10,680 20,463 31.143 1.91 1997-98 117,599 49,865 67,734 11.320 20,008 31,328 2.16 1998-99 120,262 49.364 70.898 12,120 18,475 30.595 2.32 (1)-Including non-opere8ng revenues. as (2)-Exclusive of depreciation and amortization. (3)-Coverage requirements per the certificate of participation indenture agreements range from 1.0 to 1.25. The coverage rate has stabilized around 2.0 for the last four years. It is the Districts policy to be in compliance with all bond covenants,and the District has the ability to raise user fees by a vole of the Board of Directors. Source:Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division. 41 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Demogmhic Statistics Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) Last Ten Fiscal Years L (4) (2) (3) Population Median (2) Public School (2) L Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment Year (In Thousands) Income Age (In Thousands) Rate 1989-90 2.325 $ 53,000 33.2 365 2.9% L 1990-91 2,411 56,380 30.4 385 4.8% 1991-92 2.512 56,346 30.4 393 4.8% 1 1992-93 2.557 54,380 30A 400 6 7% V 1993-94 2,697 54.413 32.6 402 5.8% 1994-95 2.641 55,507 32.9 412 5.5% I 1995-96 2,624 57,106 31.9 422 4.2% L.I 1996-97 2.632 59,629 32.2 443 3.5% 1997-98 2,615 60,000 30.4 458 4.2% I '; 1998-99 Z776 61,812 31.8 471 2.8% irk L L 1 V L Notes and Data Sources: L (1)- The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59%of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundries of the County of Orange. (2)- Data Source-Center for Demographic Research,Califomia State University, Fullerton. (3)- Data Source-Orange County Department of Education. (4)- Data Source-Demographic Research Unit,Calrfomia Department of Finance. L L L L 42 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Property Value and Construction Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years v Non- Assessed Residential Residential _. Property Value(2) Constr.(3) Construction(3) Total Fiscal Calendar No.of Construction Year Value Year Value Units Value Value(3) 1989-90 $ 141,941,723 1990 $ 1,172,651 11,976 $ 1,392,217 $ 2,564,868 r 1990-91 158,342,197 1991 797,489 6,569 1,089,116 1,886,585 1991-92 170,151,136 1992 567,121 5,943 1,032,196 1,599,317 1992-93 178,534,134 1993 496,724 6,410 1.083,716 1,580,440 r 1993-94 178,761,413 1994 560,558 12,644 1.745,301 2,305,859 1994-95 176,974,944 1995 582,712 8,300 1,295,297 1,878,009 1995-96 172,508,373 1996 760,809 10,207 1.528,835 2,289,644 r 1996-97 177,300,663 1997 1,079,687 12,251 2,007,084 3,086,771 1997-98 182,294,316 1998 1,529,491 10,050 1,852,552 3,382,043 1998-99 192.625,739 1999 1,796.024 12,991 2,313,189 4,109,213 r r r ,r Notes and Data Sources: (1)- The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59%of the total 799 square r miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2)- Orange County Auditor-Controller. - - (3)- 'The Chapman University Economic&Business Review". All 1999 amounts are forecasts. r r r r V r 43 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the Orange County Sanitation District L June 30, 1999 L Population as of City January 1,1999 L Anaheim 306,300 Brea 36,400 Buena Park 75,900 u Costa Mesa 105,600 Cypress 48,500 11 Fountain Valley 56,400 U Fullerton 126.800 Garden Grove 156,500 L'Huntington Beach 196,700 Irvine 136,600 La Habra 55,800 La Palma 16,400 L Los Alamitos 12,050 Newport Beach 74,000 Orange 127,600 L Placentia 49,160 Santa Ana 315,000 Seal Beach 27,200 Stanton 33,850 Tustin 66,800 Villa Park 8,625 Wesuninister 88,200 6d Yorba Linda 61,800 23 Cities Subtotal 2,176,175 L Unincorporated County Areas 208,200 Total 2,386,375 j L L L L Source: Demographic Research Unit,California Department Of Finance. L 44 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Insurance in Force rr As of June 30, 1999 �I Type Insurer Deductible Limit All-Risk PnopeM Fifteen Carders Fire and Flood $25,000 $300 Million per occurrence. Earthquake Greater of 5%per $65 Million per occun since. ,r unit or$100,000 Boiler& Machinery The Hartford Insurance Co. $25,000 to $100 Million per occurrence. r $100.000 Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance The Hartford Insurance Co. $5.000 $1 Million per loss. u Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance General Liability Self-Insured r Excess General Liability Sable Insurance Co. $100.000 $25 Million per occurrence Travel&Accident The Hartford Insurance Co. -0- $100,000 per person; $500,000 aggregate for any one accident. Workers' r Compensation Self-Insured r Excess Workers' Compensation Reliance National Indemnity Co. $250.000 Statutory coverage for each Each Accident accidentleach employee. Y� r Source'. Orange County Sanitation District's Risk Management Office. 45 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type INI (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years L Millions of Gallons of Wastewater Treated Total Fiscal Per Personal Malnt Depr.& Total Interest Non- Total Year Day Services UUIIWs &Other Amon- Operating Expense Other Operating Expenses 1989-90 .26& $ 19.170 $5.678 $19,224 $17,728 $61.698 11 9.368 $1.048 $ 10,416 $ 72,114 ;.M�i flin 1990-91 24,170 5.483 20,711 23.520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 85,360 u 1991-92 26,757 5,920 20.416 23,348 76,439 11.825 2,405 14,230 90,669 1992-93 "t+• 28,924 7.235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11.799 1,260 13,049 98,835 I 4 c. Li 1993-94 ,y�'J,3 26,886 4,589 21,599 33,988 89,082 18,960 2,414 19,378 108,140 ,t:e✓iid. 1 199495 ;�' 29,399 3,180 27,389 34,O87 94,036 23,8/1 an24,787 118,802 L 1995-98 + 32,660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20.731 7,648 28,379 124,132 1996-97 r 31,523 3,744 22.851 35.264 93,402 21,237 1,497 22,734 116,136 ! M1ti,r u � n 1997-96 ."! 28,725 3,326 22,528 35,841 90,420 19,232 1,330 20,682 110,982 1998-99 124. 28,809 3,320 20,980 42,492 88,881 18,359 1,658 20,016 116,688 L II In 1989,the Districts completed a 30 year master plan which projected wastewater treatment flows to Increase from 275 millions of V gallons Dar day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mgd in 1995 and out to 400 mgd in the year 2020. In order to manage the Increase in wastewater flows,the Districts initiated a$1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan with projected debt financing costs of$1.2 billion and future operating and maintenance costs,"eluding depreciation,of$62 million annually. Total expenses have Increased$43.5 million,or 60.3 percent,since 1989-90 primarily as a result of the expected increases in wastewater flows. Of this increase,depreciation expense represented 57.0 percent and debt service interest represented another 20.7 percent as a result of the capital facilities expansion that has been completed. j As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment flows had a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to r a ten year low of 227 mgd in 1991-92 and have since increased to 241 mgd in 1998-99. I The sudden drop in 1991-92 influent Is attributable to a combination of factors including: U -the state-wide recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County,but caused a migration of existing commercial and Industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupancies. -the So.California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes In water usage habits. u The District has performed a master plan update to ensure that future plant capacity will match the future needs of the residents of Orange County. L Source:Orange County Sanitation District. 46 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Biosolids Produced Last Ten Fiscal Years 50,000 45.000 40.000 35.000 30,000 4 25,000 20,000 ■1989-90 019W91 ❑INN-92 01992-93 01993-91 019N 95 ■1995 N 019%97 ■1997-98 M 1998 99 _ Fiscal Year Tonnaoe 1989-90 48.439 1990-91 44,968 1991-92 43,464 1992-93 41.964 1993-94 39.650 1994-95 40,228 1995.96 38,802 1996.97 39.387 1997-98 42,645 1998-99 41,023 Source:Orange County Sanitation District. 47 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Miscellaneous Statistics V June 30, 1999 District Organization: 1 Consolidated District servicing 23 plies, unincorporated areas, and three special districts as follows: y Revenue Area No. 1 Revenue Area No.3 Revenue Area No.7 County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange Cities: Cities: Cities: trrl Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea Orange I � Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana y Special Districts: Cypress Tustin Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts: District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary Garden Grove District I.I Huntington Beach La Habra ` La Palma Revenue Area No. 11 u Los Alamitos County of Orange Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach 1 Seal Beach Revenue Area No.2 Stanton Revenue Area No. 73 County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange Cities: Midway City Sanitary Cities: Anaheim District Brea �I Brea Orange Fountain Valley Revenue Area No.5 Yorba Unda Fullerton County of Orange L Garden Grove City of Newport Beach Le Habra Revenue Area No. 14 Orange County of Orange Placentia Revenue Area No.6 Cities: Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine Villa Park Cities: Orange I Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin Special Districts: Special Districts: Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Ranch Water District District Governing Body: 29 member Board of Directors. Staff: 518.5 authorized full-time equivalent employees. L Operational Date: July 1, 1954. Authority: California Health 8 Safety Code Section 4700 at.seq. YV Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal. Service Area: 471 square miles. Population Served: 2,386,375 Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtrunk sewers-650 miles F Number of pumping stations-22 Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 89 million of gallons per day I.I Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 152 million of gallons per day Total 241 million of gallons per day Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. lL 48 Yr Orange County Sanitation District Finance Department Accounting Division (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 o(SD 10/99 FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT • F' moil a It First Quarter -~ Ended September 30, 1999 A � f 2§. 41j PAP 6 ryE PPP Orange County Sanitation District, California Table of Contents r Section 1 - Overview........................................................................................................1 r Financial Report- Section 2 -Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge............................................................2 Comparisonof Expenses by Department...................................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category.................................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item.................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process ...........................................................8 Chart of Staffing Trends .............................................................................................9 r Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Review r Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Current Year..........2 r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life.............7 Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Area .r Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas ........................................................1 Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2 r Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review..........................................................................4 Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5 Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6 Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7 Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8 RevenueArea No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10 r Section 5 - Self Insurance Budget Review .. General Liability Fund Budget Review .......................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review...........................................................2 r Operational Report Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1 r r 1999-00 First Quarter Report u l� L' U This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L ll L.i J L 'L y i L r Overview r First Quarter Financial & Operational Report r September 30, 1999 r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1999-00 first quarter comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1999-00 performance objectives as established in the 1999-00 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. r Joint Operating& Working Capital Budget Review. At September 30, 1999, 27.29 percent, or$12,009,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 14.94 percent, or$1,561,000 from r the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1999 is $544.26 based on flows of .+ 22,065 million gallons, or 239.84 million gallons per day. This is $62.02, or 12.86 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due in part to expenditures being slightly high at 27.29 percent, but mostly due to the shortfall r in flows which are 4.06 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. r Included within the costs of Joint Operating is the cost of the Huntington Beach Closure Project totaling $750,800. Without these costs, total net joint operating expense would be $11,258,000, or 25.58 percent of budget, and the total cost per million gallons would be $510.23 or 5.80 percent above budget. r Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of September 30, 1999 include: • Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 26.62 percent of budget through the first quarter while staffing was 21 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 4.0 percent below the total 519 FTE's approved in the 1999-00 budget. Personnel costs were high in the first quarter due to (1) the distribution of annual bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2) the early .. retirement and associated accrual payoff for several employees, and (3) overtime costs associated with the Huntington Beach Closure Project. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year-end. • Retirement—First quarter expenses for retirement are at 32.73 percent, or$634,400 r of the $1,938,600 budget due to the fact that bonuses, benefit option plan payments, and leave payoffs are now subject to the Orange County Employees' Section 1 - Page 1 r L 1999-00 First Quarter Review Retirement System employer and employee contributions. This was not taken into consideration at the time the budget was submitted for retirement expenses. t , • Memberships—At the end of the first quarter, membership expense totaled $80,525, or 44.22 percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a majority of the District's memberships are due in the first quarter. L • Notices& Ads— First quarter expenses for notices and ads were at 46.14 percent, or$10,889 of the 1999-00 budget of$23,600 due to searches to fill several vacant it positions. • Lab Chemicals & Supplies- At the end of the first quarter, lab chemical and LI supplies costs totaled $170,100, or 47.72 percent of the $356,400 budget. These costs are high because of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the months of July and August due to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. y • Groundskeeping & Janitorial—At the end of the first quarter, groundskeeping and janitorial costs totaled $487,400, or 33.36 percent of budget due to one-time annual Li costs of$17,150 in tree pruning and $2,570 in weed abatement. I f • Contractual Services— Other—First quarter expenses for other contractual services u were at 38.70 percent, or$469,100 of the $1,212,300 budget. This high cost is a result of engineering/consulting costs of$309,000 which have been charged to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. LI • Legal—At the end of the first quarter, legal expenses totaled $125,300, or 32.12 LJ percent of budget primarily due to the unanticipated costs of $45,700 associated with the legal issues surrounding the use of biosolids in Kern County. • Professional Services—Audit & Accounting— First quarter expenses of $32,800 are V at 70.03 percent of the $46,800 budget due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year. • Natural Gas—At the end of the first quarter, natural gas expense totaled $319,900, or 30.93 percent of budget due to a combination of an increase in the cost per unit of usage, accounting for approximately$16,500, and an increase in the actual units of natural gas consumed, accounting for approximately$37,200. • Power— First quarter expenses for electricity are at 28.62 percent of the $1,411,400 LI budget primarily due to the increase in the cost per unit. L� • AQMD Operating Fees— First quarter expenses for AQMD operating fees are at 43.12 percent of the $142,000 budget due to the timing of when AQMD requires payments. Semi-annual fees are due during the first and third quarters each fiscal year. u Section 1 - Page 2 V Overview • Other Non-Operating Expenses —At the end of the first quarter, other non-operating expenses totaled $18,700, or 39.37 percent of budget primarily due to a one-time payment of $10,000 to the State Water Resources Control Board for the July 21, 1998 discharge of sewage into the Newport Bay. Comparison of First Quarter Results with Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years sso we.0 agxu Sao �as.>s a5g nzn am 3M 2.e`ffi M-97 2LA 2" UM 1st Year 1st Year let Year at Year 1st MrU.1 Ott end oar am otr etw Car etw oar Budget As demonstrated in the graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the first quarter has been somewhat lower than at year-end for each of the last four years. The 1999- 00 first quarter is higher than compared to the annual budget due to lower than anticipated flows and to higher costs, mainly a result of the Huntington Beach Closure Project. The District budgeted $440,000 for the reappropriation of fiscal year 1998-99 funds in the current year. Of those funds $157,500 was used for reappropriation, and the balance of $282,500 was incorporated into the general manager's contingency account. The general manager's contingency account was originally budgeted at $203,100 for fiscal year 1999-00. To date, $73,200 has been applied towards the rental of the financial information computer system, since this capital project was closed out at August 31, 1999. This leaves a remaining balance in the general managers contingency account of $412,400. Section 1 - Page 3 1999-00 First Quarter Review r Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution .. towards the gallonage charge through the first quarter 1999-00, as budgeted for 1999- 00, and as actually incurred through the first quarter 1998-99. All three charts are quite similar showing little change among the current year first quarter actual, current year r budget, and prior year first quarter actual. More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 r provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the first quarter for the last five years; Section 2— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for September 30, 1997, 1998, and 1999; Section 2— Page 4 provides a .. summary of expenses by major category through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2—pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Capital Outlay Review. r $100,000,000 SaoWo,000 S80,000,000 r $70.000,000 S60,000,000 r $601000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 50 V 9/30199 Actual Capital Projected 1999-00 Originally Estimated Outlay-S10,898,000 Capital Outlay- 1999-00 Capital $92,401,500 Outlay. $92,401,500 r As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $10,898,000, or 11.79 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1999-00 as of September 30, 1999. Costs are proportionately low through the first quarter as most projects are still in the design phase, but they are expected to approximate budget by year-end. _ Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay r requirements incurred through September 30. r Section 1 - Page 4 Overview " For more detailed information, Section 3 — Pages 2 through 6 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 7 through 11 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over " the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At September 30, 1999, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $7.1 million, or 5.07 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at$32.86 million, are only at 5.85 percent of budget, or .. $1.9 million, and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, budgeted at $74.3 million, is only at 0.79 percent of budget, or $585,000. Both of these revenue sources are low because most of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are not distributed to the District until after the first quarter of each year. Interest revenues, budgeted at $26.8 million, are only at$4,097,000, or 15.30 percent, due to lower than expected interest rates on investments and the impact of "marking to market" in this environment. r Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $41.8 million, or 22.3 percent of budget through September 30, 1999. COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at $41.7 million, are high at 40.91 percent of budget, or$17.1 million because the first of the semi-annual interest payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal year. Conversely, the costs incurred related to capital improvement projects (share of .. Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are proportionately low through the end of the first quarter at$10,898,000, or 11.79 percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. r Self-insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers' Compensation and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund ., accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $169,000 or 14.9 percent of budget at September 30, while total expenses were $317,300 or 28.29 percent of budget. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of September 30, 1999. Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and incorporated into the 1999-00 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 1999-00, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level. r Section 1 - Page 5 1999-00 First Quarter Review At September 30, 1999, 75 percent of the District's performance objectives and 64% of U the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. L I L u L L �i L I V V II V L I L L L Sectlon 1 -Pegs 8 J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 - 0&M Engineering 54% 2% r GSA 10% r Finance 5% Comm. 1% 'e, Into.Tech 8% Exec.Mgmt. Tech.Svcs. H/R 3% 17% 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges 1999-00 Budget r Engineering 0% O&M 56% r GSA 10% r Finance 6% Comm. 1% r Info.Tech. 5% Exec.Mgmt H/fl 3% Tech.Svcs. r 19% 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three Months Ended September 30. 1998 O&M - Engineering 81% 0% GSA 9% r Finance 6% Comm. r 1% Into.Tech. 3% Exec.Mgmt. r 2% Tech.Svcs. HIM 17% 1% Section 2—Page 1 r ll 1999-00 First Quarter Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge 1 For the Three Months Ended September 30, U 9130196 9130196 9130197 9130198 1999400 913M9 Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual W Flow In Million Gallons 21,W7.71 22.344.81 22,896.85 23.2W.07 91,240.89 22,005,00 Flow In Million Gallons oar Day 237.04 242.88 248.80 252.57 250.DO 239.84 LI General Manager.D.partmont 13.35 12.9 12.95 9.46 14.09 15.10 11��11 Communications 8.11 5.08 5.32 5.541 5.21 7.37 Human Resources Department 7.25 10.30 11.W 7.40 9.43 10.98 I Finance Department u Finance Administration 20.02 18.33 10.42 13.81 10.37 0.05 Accounting 10.14 7.46 10.70 11.01 8.16 13.68 Purchasing 8 Warehousing 7.38 4.19 5.18 6.86 8.92 0.29 J Tout 37.54 29.95 32.35 31.70 31.45 31.02 a...ml Services Department General Services Administration 2.74 6.50 4.15 4.25 3.31 3.33 Collection Facilities Maintenance 0.79 2.99 1.54 3.90 3.62 16.50 u Plant Facilities Maintenance 37.73 38.36 33.46 35.03 43.03 38.01 Total 41.28 47.84 39.46 43.19 51.00 50 St I nfomntlon Technology Department I.T.Administration - - - 2.57 0.19 7.75 L1 Customer 8 HenauA Support 2.47 4.79 7.87 6.38 11.78 15.52 Programing 5 CaleOese 3.84 6.44 8.85 2.76 3.10 5.60 Process CM Integration 12.56 0.77 3.25 3.22 3.69 1.42 Total 18.87 14.00 17.97 10.93 24.76 33.35 led Operations 8 Maintenance Department Opns 8 Maint. Administration 12.88 12.92 2.32 2.10 3.33 1.80 O 8 M Process Engineering 4.81 3.60 5.24 4.42 6.17 9.15 6.1 Plant No.1 Operations - 75.55 67.00 70.73 63S2 89.05 Plant No.2 Operations - 109.80 89.13 95.07 94.91 101.65 Mechanical Malnlenence 49.69 50.63 44.88 60.83 48.80 46.46 Electrical S Instrumentation Maintenance 41.33 39.14 43.57 45.56 49.42 52.39 V Air Ouality,8 Special Projects - 7.73 8.12 7.48 13.69 Central Generation 26.48 31.55 23.31 28.82 29.80 Plant Operations 198.56 - - - - Total 307.05 317.12 291.47 301.14 300.53 324.30 L Technical Samicas Department Technical Services Administmtlan 6.25 3.96 5.33 7.33 1.29 1.26 EnWmnm rntal Compliance 5 Monitoring W.89 38.96 27.81 32.28 40.76 47.87 1 Emhonmental Sciences 1a0oralory 39.29 31.88 29.29 33.55 34.49 42.78 V Source Coastal 0.55 2.98 3.03 8.43 2.75 11.17) Safety 5 Emergency Response 6.58 8.23 3.56 2.74 8.53 9.37 Total 78.W 81.99 09.22 82.83 91.82 100.10 Engineering Department Irrl Engineering Administration 0.53 0.71 - 0.02 0.05 10.78) Planning 8 Design 0.91 2.08 0.19 0.81 0.03 0.40 Construction Management 0.44 1.77 1.11 0.41 1.97 12.47 Total 1.88 4.54 1.30 1.24 2.00 12.15 V Total Joint Operating Expenses 511.67 523.21 481.06 499.59 530.41 WAS Lase:Revenues (43A (36.12) (63,95) (49,92) (48.17) (49.B3I ` Net Joint Operating Exp....a 468.24 487.09 417.71 449.67 482.24 544.20 1I61' IIsiI irs Section 2-Page 2 J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999-0o 9130197 9130198 Year to Data Budget% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 9130199 Realized General Manager's Department 296.624 219,871 1,286,600 333,190 25.92% r Communications 121.848 131,107 475,200 162.626 34.22% Human Resources Department 266,186 173,500 860,700 241,888 28.10% Finance Department Finance Administration 376,863 320,823 1,494,000 177.613 11.89% Accounting 246,403 255,886 744,200 301.808 40.0% Purchasing 8 Warehousing 118,691 159,952 631,400 204,920 32.45% Total 740,957 736,661 2,859,600 684,341 23.81 General Services Department General Services Administration 95,116 98,927 301,900 73,537 24.36% Collection Fadfi ies Maintenance 42,082 9D,560 348,400 408.192 117.16% Plant Facilities Maintenance 766,053 813,845 4.008,900 838.699 20.92% Total 903,251 1,003,332 4.669,200 1,320.428 28.34% Information Technology Department I.T.Administration - 59,723 565,000 171,054 30.28% r Customer 8 Network Support 180,228 194.696 1.075,000 408,746 38.02% Programing 8 Database 155,957 64,207 2a2,400 124,807 44.20% Process Cut Integration 74,498 74,795 336,400 31,256 9.29% Total 411,683 393,622 2.268,800 735,863 32.58% Operations 6 Maintenance Department Opns a Maint. Administration 53,177 48,717 303,750 39,726 13.08% 0&M Process Engineering 119,976 102,743 562,550 201,789 36.87% W Plant No. 1 Operations 115341193 1.643,542 5,804,800 1,523,498 26.25% Plant No.2 Operations 2,040,972 2,232,304 8,659,300 2,248,050 25.96% Mechanical Maintenance 1,027,557 1.181.034 4,452,800 1,024,987 23.02% Electrical B Instrumentation Mtce. 997,665 1,058,637 4,509,100 1.156,092 25.54% Air Quality 8 Special Projects 177,001 168,589 680,900 301,964 44.35% Central Generation 723.026 641,541 2,446,700 659,502 26.95% Total 6,673,567 6,997.087 27,419,900 7,155,594 26.10% ed Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 126,539 182.004 665,000 27.622 4.15% Environmental Compliance 3 Monitoring 636,652 749,979 3,719,300 1,056,358 28.40% Environmental Sciences Laboratory 870,se1 779,480 3,147,300 944,013 29.99% Source Contact 59.325 149,468 260,700 (26,879) (10.32%) Safety 8 Emergency Response 81.538 63,593 595,500 206,e76 34.71% Total 1.684,745 1,924.524 8,377,80D 2,208,790 26.36% `+ Engineering Department Engineering Administration 1 418 5,600 (17,138) (306.D4%) Planning 8 Design 4.273 18.815 3.100 10,072 324.90% ew Construction Management 25,390 9.525 179,50D 275,181 153.30% Total 29.664 28,758 183,200 268,115 142.46% Total Joint Operating Expenses 11,028,626 11,608,462 48,395,000 13,110,835 27.09% Less:Revenues (1,464,240) (1,159,917) (4,395,000) (1,101,648) 25.07% Net Joint Operating Expenses 9,584,285 10,448,545 44,000,000 12,009,167 27.29% Section 2—Page 3 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report 60 Summary of Expenses by Major Category L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent u Budget Thru Thm (Decrease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining Description 1999-00 W30199 9130198 9 % Realized Budget Salary,Wages&Benefits 37 655,800 10.022.092 9,649,479 372,613 3.86 26.62 27,633,708 Administrative Expenses 804,100 239,883 196.575 41.308 20.80 29.83 564,217 L Printing&Publication 386,500 77,647 $6,183 (8,536) (9.90) 20.09 308,853 l Tralnin9 8 Meetings ngs 991.000 194,104 94,599 99,505 705.19 19.59 796,89E y Operating Expenses 4909,200 1,227.259 1,261.260 (34,D01) (2.70) 25.00 3,681,941 II Contractual Services 6,737,70D 1,882,076 1.423,949 458.127 32,17 27,93 4,855,624 611 Professional Services 2,480,900 419,468 271,193 148,275 54.68 16ei 2.061,432 1I Research B Monitoring 2.428,600 575,471 471.300 104,171 22.10 23.70 1.853,129 y Repairs&Maintenance 5$30,400 1,078,731 677.905 400.826 59.13 19.16 4,551,669 1 Utilities 3.578,500 994400 717,766 276.634 38.54 27.79 2,684.100 Other Materials,Supplies, I and services 2.524.900 480.021 480,463 19,568 4.25 19.01 2,044,879 (nl Net Cost Allocation (19.732.600) (4.080,317) (3704,193) (376,124J 10.15 20.68 (15,652,283) ' 4 Total Joint Operating Expense 48,395.000 13.110.835 11.608.469 1,502,366 12.94 27.09 35,284,195 Revenues 8 Offsets (4,395,000) 1 1( . 01.BMI 1( 159.917) 58,269 (5.02) 25.07 (3,293.352) I 1 Net Joint Operating Expense 44,000,000 12,009,187 10,446,552 1,560,635 14.94 27.29 31,990,813 u Gallonage Flow(MG) 91,240.89 22,065.00 23,236.07 (1,171) (5.04) U Gallonage Flow(MGD) 250.OD 239.84 252.57 (12,73) (5.047 Gallonage Flow(8's/MG) 482.24 5442E 449.67 94.59 21.04 I � 6L L L L Section 2-Page 4 L J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item 'r For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 % r Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase Budget Thm n. Remaining thru (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 1999-00 940199 9130199 Budget etim $ % r Inter District Sever Use 1,500,000 399,953 26.66 1,100,047 359.592 40,381 11.22 Wastehauler 425,000 94,186 22.16 330,814 116,279 (22,093) (19.00) Sludge Disposal 900,000 182,638 20.29 717,362 177,083 5,555 3.14 Scrap Sales 25,000 - - 25,000 - - WA Other Sales 200,000 445 0.22 199,655 625 (180) (28.80) Rents&Leases 120.000 91.670 76.39 28,330 90.469 1,201 1.33 General Non40pereting 50,000 36.431 72.86 13,569 13,181 23,250 176.39 r VehideB Equipment 300,000 74,480 24.82 225,540 74,055 405 0.55 Sampling Charges 325,000 102.785 31.63 222,215 124,561 (21,776) (17.48) em Power Sales 550,000 119,080 21.65 430,920 204.072 (84,992) (41.65) Total Joint Operating Revenues 4.395.000 1,101.648 25.07 3293,352 1,159,917 (58,269) (5.02) r r r r r r r r r r Section 2-Page 5 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report 1.0 Summary of Expenses by Line Item u For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Fspeme %Expense Egeme Increase Increase I , Budgrt Thm Thm Renaming Thm (Decrease) (Decrease) J Dascreflon 199900 9130M 9/309 Budget 9l3W98 9 % Salaries,Wames.B BeneBls Salaries&Wages 32123,300 8,372599 2606 23,750.701 8,322.466 50.133 0.6D Employee Benefits: I Retirement 1,938,600 634,433 3273 1.304.157 493,928 140,505 28.45 err Croup lmuralxes 3,177,000 892234 28.08 2,254766 733.443 158,791 21.65 Tutor Rarbun;annelV - 25,753 WA (25,753) 25.600 153 0.60 � lhn8ornfclanbl 67,200 16,584 24.68 50.616 15.612 972 6,23 y V4bdres'Compensation 237,400 77.499 32.64 159,9DI 54,75D 22,749 41.55 Unarplofnad insurance lIZ30D 2990 266 109,310 3,680 (690) (18.75) Total Benefits 5,532.,500 1,60,493 29.81 3,833,07 1,327,013 322,480 24.30 6d Salaries,Milos,&Benefits 37,6M= 10.022.092 2&62 27,633.708 9,649.479 372,613 3.86 Mae Supply,&services L Adrrinistra8ve Expenses Merberships 182,100 80.525 4422 101575 59.423 21,102 3&61 Office Ep-Supplies 155XI 29.774 19.18 125,426 54,423 (24,649) (4529) y OIBoaEperse-Otter 109.00D 19.038 17.47 89,962 28,624 (9,586) (33.49) SmaOCalputerllans 250.00D 81,538 32.62 168.462 45,084 36,464 Wes Wor Furniture,ForWres,etc 17,800 29.008 26.91 78.792 11,021 17,997 163.21 r Prirring&Publicarton Rep: 4r,House 2115,IDD 58.245 20.42 226,9W 55,197 3,048 5.52 i Pnnting-Outside 67.500 6,388 9.46 61,112 22,129 (15,741) (71.13) Wtces&Ads 23,60D 10,889 46.14 12711 6,648 4,241 63.79 Photo Processing 1O,2W 2125 20.83 8.075 2,209 (84) (3.8% , I Training&Meetings L mee8ngs =M0 60.144 21.25 185,a% 4%M 1,055 2.15 Training 755,000 143,950 19.07 611.040 45.510 98.460 216M Operating Expenses V Chemhal Coagulants 1,37,300 zr%m 2135 1.028,022 305.954 (27,706) ( .0% Sulfide Control 1,255A90 291,956 2325 90.844 298,688 (6,73% (LS) j OdorContol 1,424,200 354,757 25.61 1,059,433 401,582 (30.765) (9.16) L Chend®Is-Cogeneration Opx. 29,700 1,828 5.48 28,072 Z743 (1,115) (40.651 NSstEllar CMrnicals 17,300 6.477 37.44 1O.10 - 6.477 WA I Caroline,Diesel&01 158,600 31,756 20.02 126.844 75.185 (43.430) (5776) V Tools 188,300 30,511 19.13 137.789 20.661 9,850 47.67 Sole,Pamis,&Jan.Supplies 41,6OD 10.730 25.79 30.810 21,489 (10,759) (5007) Lab Clericals&Supplies 359.000 170,77 47.36 188,e23 M172 79,905 Bill j Otter OPeaerng supplies 147.400 40,079 27.19 l(Y7= 411104 (3.m (8.50) �r1 (Continued) . L �rll Section 2-Page 6 1 L J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item `. For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase Budget Thru Thm Remaining Thru (Decrease) (Decrease) Description ISW99 9130199 9130199 Budget 9130M $ % continued `. Contractual Services Solids Removal 4,293,500 1,083,749 25.24 3,209,761 1,127,692 (43,943) (3.90) Other Waste Disposal 490,700 124,553 25.38 355.137 42,626 82,037 192.91 rl Gmundskespin9&Janitorial 262,000 87,412 33.36 174,588 32.047 55.W5 172.76 Outside Lab Services 147,700 47,338 32.05 100,352 24.169 23.179 95.94 Oxygen Plant Oper 331,500 69,890 21.08 281,610 65,654 1,206 1.76 Other 1,212,300 469,124 38.70 743,176 126,841 340.283 254.11 Professional Serviras Legal 390,DD0 125,274 32.12 264,725 120,856 4,416 3.65 Audit&Accounting 4S8DD 32,776 70.03 14,024 27,067 Sees 21.00 Engineering 465,500 59,160 12.71 406,340 27,592 31,568 114.41 Otlmr 1,571L60D 202268 12.81 1,376,342 95,656 106.602 111." Research&Nbnitodng Ervimnmental Monitoring 1,678,10D 455.424 27.14 1,222,676 390,980 64.444 16.48 AT Quality Monitoring 95,000 - 95,ODD 32D (320) (100.OD) Research 655,500 120.047 18.31 WSAW $0,000 40.047 50.06 e.l Repairs B Maintenance Materials&Services 3,809,10D 985.372 25.87 2,823,728 476,811 508.561 105.66 Svc.Mtc.Agreements 1,821,300 93.359 5.13 1,727,941 201,094 (107,7W) (53.57) LIElides r Telephone 247,70D 54,748 22.10 192,952 45.293 9.455 20.88 Diesel For Generators 10.OW - - 10,000 - - WA Natural Gas 1,032.WO 319.887 30.98 71Z613 224,303 95,584 42.61 Pener 1,411,400 403,998 25.62 1,007,4D2 246,016 157.982 64.22 Water 876.900 216,767 24.81 651,133 202,154 13.613 6.73 Other Operating Supplies Outside Equip Rental 179AM 25,712 14.32 153,866 23,297 2,415 10.37 Dal ict Equip Rental 319,400 74.195 23.23 245205 73,746 449 0.61 Insurance 1,188,000 240,649 20.26 947,351 253,397 (12,738) (5,03) F"M 58,6DO 12,857 22.72 43,743 14,409 (1,552) (10.77) Max,Operating Expense 185,000 46,719 25.12 139,281 36,535 10,164 27,87 ACM)Operating Fees 142,000 61,226 43.12 80,774 64,834 6,392 11.66 General Manager Contingency 405b00 - - 405,900 - - WA r Other Non Oper Expense 47,400 Isom 39.37 28.737 4,246 14,418 339.65 Maus,5upp.&serv. 30,471,80D 7,169.050 23.63 23,302,740 5,663,183 1,505,877 26.69 Toil J.O.Requirements 68,127,600 17,191J52 25.23 50,935,448 15,312,662 1,678,490 12.27 Net Cost Allorabon (19,732,6DO) (4,080,317) 20.65 (15,652283) (3,704,193) (376,124) 10.15 Nut J.O.Requiraments 48,395,000 13,110,835 27.09 35,284,165 11,6D8,469 1,502.366 12.94 r Lass: Revenue (4,395,000) (1,101,648) 25.07 (3,293,352) (1,159,917) 58,269 (5.02) Net J.O.Expenditures 44,000,000 12,009,187 27.29 31,990.813 10,448,552 1,560,635 14.94 ICI Section 2-Page 7 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 Increase Increase Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 6I 9130199 9130198 $ % Treatment Process: Lr Preliminary Treatment 1,031,394 949,633 81,761 8.61 Primary Treatment 1,192,076 1,133,234 58,842 5.19 Secondary Treatment 732,585 865,929 (133,344) (15.40) Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 127,781 76,389 51,392 67.28 L Effluent Disposal 182,523 164,757 17,766 10.78 L Solids Handling 4,057,453 3,236,004 821,449 25.38 Cogeneration 981,933 821,983 159,950 19.46 Utilities 262,784 251,923 10,861 4.31 L I ' Electrical Distribution 159,294 153.902 5,392 3.50 �+ Miscellaneous Buildings 1,477,070 1,492,406 (15,336) (1.03) N Air Quality 564,539 419,655 144,884 34.52 Laboratory 876,157 856,879 19,278 2.25 V Source Control 1,465,246 1,185,775 279,471 23.57 Total Joint Operating Requirements 13,110,835 11,608.469 1,502,366 12.94 Less: Revenues (1,101,648) (1,159,917) 68,269 5.02 y Net Joint Operating Expenditures 12.009,187 10,448,552 1,560,635 14.94 L V Ir L V Section 2—Page 8 L J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents September 30, 1999 700 673 560 560 575 549 519 450 613011996 6/30/1997 6130/1998 6130/1999 9130,1999 ■Actual ■Vacant At September 30, 1999, the total head count was 507 employees, or a full time equivalency of 497,75. r r Section 2—Page 9 1999-00 First Quarter Report y L 1- L This Page Left Intentionally Blank u u L 6.1 y L L Section 2—Page 10 L CIP Review Capital Improvement Program— FV 1999-00 For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Plant t S845575 Collection Projects S3,707,023 "ice Plant2 St G]0,]95 LY f 14'. t Equipment Items Interplant&Joint 5801,792 Facilities ]y S3,076,911 28". Special Projects S995,433 9% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure- S10,897,529 Revenue Area 3 Revenue Area 13 S4.500,176 S85,567 41% Revenue Area 2 Revenue S2,]15,54] Area 1 251. 5812.205 ]96 Revenue Area 1 t Revenue 5623,495 Revenue Areas Revenue Revenue 6% Area 14 S5A,971 5181,920 Area] Area 6 2aa $991.701 S408,946 5'. 9% 4% Total Capital Improvement Funding -S10,897,529 Section 3—Page 1 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year I I For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 V 199940 199940 1999-00 1999-00 Fstlmalad Actual Remaining Projected Outlay @9r30%) Outlay Outlay L Revenue System Imoroent Projects Revenuenue vam Area 1 a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1.17 17.000 14,778 2,222 17.000 b Miscellaneous Capital Improverrente 15.000 15,0D0 15,000 L Sub-Total-Revenue Area 1 32.000 14,778 17,222 32,000 Revenue Area 2 a Same Ana River Interceptor Realignment&Protection,241 423,800 43,014 380,788 423800 b Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210,600 2,033 20&567 210:600 L c Aswood Subbunk Improvements,2-W 214.000 1.224 21Z776 214,000 d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,234R 1,256.0D0 502,170 753.630 1,256,0D0 a Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sfn.Abandonment,2.24-1 1,253,300 504 1.252,738 1,263,300 I f Euclid Relief Improvements-Reach"A",252 1,700 1,082 616 1,700 y g Miscellaneous Capital Improvements S0,000 22.214 37.766 80,0D0 h Trunk Sewer Mapping ProJed 80,400 - 80,400 80,400 1 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Saver,2-21-1 283,600 678 252,922 263,600 I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 63,800 4.112 59,688 53,800 L Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 3,827,200 577,091 3.250,109 3,827,200 Revenue Area 3 a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,338.1 4,825,9D0 1.132,959 3.892,941 4,875,900 b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Serer In Western Ave.,341 76.000 2,482 73.518 76,000 ln� c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3-11R 219,500 252,755 (33.255) 252,755 d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,335R 3.437.600 875,320 2,562,280 3.437,800 a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 14,789 45,211 BO,ODO L f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 89.400 6.757 83,643 89.400 g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101,a00 101,900 101,900 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3 8,810,300 2,254,082 S528,238 8,643,555 Revenue Area 6 as a Relocation of Lido Pump Station,5<1-1 332,600 252,136 80,484 332,800 It, Replacement of Berk Bay Trunk Sewer,5<8 950.400 12,954 937,418 950,400 c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements SO,DDO 10,841 49.159 60,000 d Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 80,5m - 80,500 90,50D 60 a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,500 11,514 166.985 178,500 f Trunk Saver Mapping Project 13,400 13,400 13,40D Sub,Total-Revenue Area 5 1.016.400 287.475 1.327,925 1,815,400 Revenue Area 6 �I a Fakvlew Relief Sewer,6.12 858,900 140,430 718,470 858,900 b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,0D0 - 15,000 15,000 c Rehab115ation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 38.200 2.467 35.733 38,200 d Trunk Sever Mapping Projed 10,700 10,700 10,70D 1�1 Sub•Total-Revenue Am =,Sao 142,807 779,903 922,800 Revenue Area 7 a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 208,300 13,570 194,730 208,300 cq L b Rauet Hill Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,800 918 203.582 204,800 c Tustin AiNaeaNmatrong Subbunk Sewer,7.27 14090D 28,150 112,750 140,900 d Gisler-Rsdlall Trunk Relocation,7.32 1201 100 129,800 129,90D a Orange Trunk Improvements,7.39 55,20D 2,530 52.670 55,200 J f Gisler-Radhlll Trunk improvements,Resch"A",736 355,800 2,633 363,167 365,800 g RA5"B"Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7.28 357,70) 30,558 327,142 357,700 h Gisler-RadhillModh Trunk Improvements,741 350,70) Z553 348,147 350700 i Miscellaneous Capital Impmvemanls 60.000 148,769 (85,769) 148:789 LI J Sunflower Intercepter Manhole Rehab.,7.21 188,601) 15.545 173,055 188,600 k Pumpstatlon SCADA Communications Study 78,1011, - 78.100 78,100 1 Trunk Serer Mapping Project 16,100 - 16,100 16.100 Sub-Total-Revenue Am 2,155,90D 245,328 1,010,574 2,244.W9 L Section 3-Page 2 L L CIP Review Capital Improvement Program—FV 1999-00 For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Plant 1 $845,575 Collection Projects 0�• $3,7W,923 34% Plant 2 $1,470,795 14% Equipment Items Interplant a Joint $801,792 Facilities Special Projeets 7% $3,076,911 28% $995,423 9% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$10,897,529 Revenue Area Revenue Area 13 54,500,176 $85,567 41% 1% Revenue Area 2 Revenue 52,715,547 Area 1 25% 5812,205 7°e Revenue Area 11 Revenue $623,496 Revenue Area 5 6% Area 14 Revenue Revenue $181,920 Area 7 Area 5 S577,971 2% 5991,701 S408,946 5% 9% 4% Total Capital Improvement Funding-S10,897,529 Section 3—Page 1 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 LI 1999-00 199940 199MD 199940 Estimated Adual Remaining Projected Outlay 9f10199 Outlay Outlay u Collection Svs[em Improvement Pmiacta Revenue Area 1 a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-17 17,000 14,778 2,222 17,000 b Macellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 15,DD0 15,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 1 32,000 14,778 17,222 32,000 Revenue Area 2 a Santa Me River Interceptor Realignment 8 Protection,241 423,800 43.014 3BD,786 423,800 b Same Ma River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210,60D 2,033 206,567 210,600 L c Atwood Subtnmk Improvements,2-50 214,000 1,224 212,776 214,000 d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,266,000 SOZ170 763,830 1,256.0D0 e Carbon Crryn Sewer and Pump Sir.Abandonment,2.24.1 1,253,300 564 1,252,736 A" 52 1.253,3D0 L f Eudid Relief Improvements-Reach" 2- I'm 618 1,700 g Miscellaneous Capital Improvements %BOB 22.214 37,758 60,0D0 It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 80.400 - 80.400 80,40D I Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2.214 all 678 262,922 253,600 L j Rehabinatlon of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 63,500 4.112 W.5118 63.800 SURTotal-Revenue A.2 3,a27,200 577.091 3,250,109 3,827,200 Revenue Area 3 a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,33 l 4,825900 1,132,959 3,692,941 4,825,900 b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave.,19-1 78,D00 2,482 73,518 76,000 L c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3�11R 219,500 252.755 (33,255) 252.755 d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,1MR 3A37A)) $75.320 2,562,2B0 3,437,600 L e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 6D.00D 14.789 45,211 60,000 f Rehabililallon of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 89,40D 5.757 83,643 89,400 g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101,900 101,900 101,900 SutrTotal-Revenue Am 8,810,300 2,284,052 6,326,238 8,843,555 L Revenue Area 6 a Reocation of Lido Pump Station,541.1 332,600 252.136 80,464 332,60D b Replacement of Back Say Trunk Sewer,546 950,400 12.984 937,416 9W.40D c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 10.641 49,159 30,OOD d Pumpstabon SCADA Communications Study 80,sm - 80.500 80,5m u a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,SM 11.514 156,9as 178,5D0 f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 13,400 13,400 13,400 Sub-Total-Revenue Ama6 1.615,400 207,475 1,327,925 1,615,40D Ravenna Ana 6 Y/ a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 8581900 140,430 718,470 858,900 b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,00g 15,000 15,0DD L c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 38,200 2,467 35.733 38,200 d Trumc Sarver Mapping Project 10,700 10,700 10,700 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 6 522,800 142,897 779,903 922,800 Revenue Area 7 a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 208,300 13,570 194.730 205,300 b Racquet HIII Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,8W 918 2D3,682 204,600 c Tustin Airbase Armstrong Subbunk Sewer,7.27 140,900 28,15D 112.750 140,900 d Gisler-Redmll Trunk Reklcetlon,7-32 129,900 100 129.800 129,900 a Orange Trunk Improvements,7-39 55.200 2,530 52.670 55,200 f Glalar-Redhlll Trunk Improvements,Read)"A",7.36 365,800 2.633 363.167 365,800 g RA$"B"Saee(ant Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7.28 357.700 30,558 327.142 357.700 h Gleler-Redhll9Hodh Trunk Improvements,741 350.700 2,553 348.147 350,700 L i Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 148,769 (88,789) 148,769 j Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7.21 fello0 15,545 173.055 1BB,600 k Pumpstadon SCADA Communications Study 78,100 - 78.100 78,10D I Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 18,100 15,100 16,100 Sub-Totel-Revenue Am 2,155,900 246,328 1,910,574 2,244,669 L Section 3-Page 2 L CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year •+ For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 199940 19" 1999-00 1999.00 Estineled Actual Remaining Pmleeled r OLIUW @9/30/99 Outlay Outlay Revalue Area 11 a Huntington Beall Sewer and Abandonment 11-23 446,200 5,031 441,169 446,2W b Goldertaesd Trunk Sewer Replaamaa,11-17-3 2,579.300 33,430 2.545.870 2,579,3W r c Heil Avenue Interceptor,11-20 2,565,800 74,422 2,491,378 2,565,B0 d Wamer Avenue Relief Serer, ll-M 448,000 3,795 442,205 446,0W e Miscellaneous Capl311mpmvemerRs 6D,000 35.015 24,985 60,000 f Rehabilitaiton of Outlying Purrs Stations,2-37 57,400 3.701 53,699 57,400 r g Purltlystudon SCADA Cmmnunimtiore Study 78.100 - 78.100 78,10D h Tnmk Sewer Mapping Project 26,800 26,800 26,800 Sub-Total-Revenue Area ll 6,259,6D0 155,394 6,104,208 6,259,600 r Revenue Area 14 a Mscelaneous Capital lmpnwerents SAOD 6.000 6.000 Sub-Total-Revenue Am 14 6.000 6,0DD 6.000 Total Collection System r Improvement Pmlects 23.679= 3.701 19.%Z177 23,751,224 The ornem&Disposal Proiecfs Reclamation Plant No.1 1. Preliminary Treatmend a Heatlworks No.2 Pump Imp.&Overhaul 2D0,200 - 200,2D0 200,200 r b Sunflover P.S.DrNs Replaoanent,P162 389,800 5.313 384.487 389,800 c Grit Chamber ModiBmtions Pl-69 107,800 100 107,700 107,800 2. Porrery,Treatrnent a PmnaryTnaVner072 MGD Expansion,Pl-37 2.440,000 312,125 2.127,875 2,440,OOD r, It Printery Effluent Riming Automation 171,80D 8,098 163,702 171.800 3. Secondary Treatment a Secondary TreaVroBM Expansion to 80 MGD,P1-3 2 687,200 85,839 601,361 687.200 b Rehabilitate Four Tridding Fitters.Pl-76 10,5W - 10,5D0 10,500 r c Five Tricidirg Filler Clardiers,P1-TI 10,5W - 10,5W 10,500 4. Solids Handling&Digestion a Mechanical Seals on High Rate Digester Ma,SP-30 425.WO 6,418 418,582 425,OW b Dek4tering Be6 Preas Rebuild 173.800 - 173,800 173.800 r 5. utility Systans a Chemical Facility MocHns,P146-2 2,531,600 43,876 2.487,724 2,531,600 It EIectl.FaalSy Moddns&Saety Upgmdes,P1461 57,100 4,239 52,861 57,100 Transfer to Project Balm (lzsm) - (12,500) (12,500) Alarm Beacensfor Venting of Gas Holder 12,5W - 12,5W 12,5W 6. Safety&Securby Improvements a Seismic Retrord of Four STNCNIees, P144d 934,700 289,502 645,198 934,7W 7. Msmllaneous&Support Prtryects r a Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-PI 1,000,000 80,070 919,9W 1,0DO,g00 Sub-Total -Reclamation Rar81 9,140,O00 535,580 8,304,420 9.140,000 r Treamrent Plant No.2 1. Prefmnnary Treadmill a Headivoiks Pump lrryrvmt&Overhaul,SP-32 216,5W 45.242 171,258 216,500 In Rehabaf Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,OW - 2W,D00 209,000 c Headmft lmproements @ Plant 2,P2-56 527,400 9,535 517,865 527,400 Transferto Project Belau - - - ReplacarerR of Barsc+eer,Influent Gate,P263 - - - - 2 Primary Treatrrent r'u a RehabD&EClzrieer Sweep Mrs 68,2W - 68,2W 68,2W Section 3-Page 3 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Summary of Capital improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year V For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 199900 Saturated Actual Remaining Projected Outlay Q9130/99 Outlay OWay 3. Secondary Treatment a DAF.Support Ral Replamrmrt 65,0W - 65,000 65,W0 4. Solids Handling 8 Dewatering a Devastating Batt Press Rebuild,SP37 252,3W 129,051 123.249 252,300 44 b Sludge Grinder Replacsrmnt/Rehab,SP-36 55,500 5,007 60,4W 55,500 c Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 6,441,2W 79,035 6,362.165 6,441,2W ofG-1,G-2 Conveyor Batt Rehab 41,800 - 41,SW 41,BW L e Souls Storage Facility at Plant 2,P2E0 4,481,5W 17,225 4.464,274 4,481,500 S. Utility Systems a High Pressure Compraased Air System,P231 488.600 11.912 476,688 488,600 b Modifnsto Era It Control Systurna 47-1 1,546,11W 389,539 1,157,251 1,546BD0 L c Gas Caryressm Redundancy,P2-79 439,2W - 4311 439r2W d UNitles Rehab B Refurbishment 13,000 - 13,OW 13.000 S. Safety Impro✓emeMa a Peak Flow Management,J-67 57,70D 6,311 51,389 57.700 7. Process Related Special Projects a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33.400 - 33,400 33,400 S. Information Management a DAFT Hardware and Software Upgrade.SP-21 109.600 - Ical 109,60D L 9. Kiwellarview 6 Support Pmjeds a Warehouse @ Plant No.2,P24 W1,000 605,510 255,49D 851.000 It Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-P2 1,00D,000 158,849 841,151 1,000,000 c Tunnel Lighting B Monitoring Rehab.,J-65 312,400 20D 312,200 31Z400 U Sub-Total -Treabrrent PlaM2 17,220,100 1,457,411 15,762,689 17,220,100 Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Collection Facilities a Colkiction Facilities Depot,JLO.1 1,524,300 - 1,524.300 1,524,300 b Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-2-4 69,700 15,258 44,432 59,700 c SSO Training Facifity 20,400 - 20,400 20400 d Cc OF Projects,InlowAml.Reduction,J-73 3,476.400 3,696 3,471,704 3,475:400 Transfer to Project Below (40,ODD) - (40,O00) (40.000) Nuisance Flow Diversion Fac at Newport Dunes 40,000 6,270 33.730 40,000 a Rehab&Upgrade of Ells Ave.Pump Station,1-10 61,1 W - 61,100 61,100 1 2. Headworks U a New Grft Augers,J52 1,073,SW 4,034 1,059,566 1,073,600 3. Secondary TreaNant a Sec.Treabmnt Mond.6CDI Syalem Upgmtle,J31-4 34,O0D 6,074 27,926 34,000 4. Ocean Outlall System L a Investigation and Repaid of Oman OnMall,J39 235,400 151158 220.242 235,40D b Foster Rehab.B Refurbishment,J-59 150.800 12,063 138,737 150,8W S. Utility systems a Can Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 431,6W 227,591 204,0Og 431.600 U to Can Gen Air Compmssw Controller Upgrade 25.100 - 25,100 25,10D c Imprvto Central Generalan Stating Air system,J33 122,700 996 121,704 122,700 it Modifns of Cen Gen Waste Heat Bolem,J-64 195,W0 - 195,000 195,OW 6. FJedriml Power System a Area Cleasifim8mu Studies,Plants 1 82,J315-1 465,3W 45,901 419,399 465,300 to Cable Tray Improvements,J47 9997W 137,9D5 851,795 999,700 c Electrical Power System Shalm,J-Dia7rema,1255 17,400 - 7Z,9W 129W 6w tl Electrical Power System Shdies,.1-254 717,4W 145,016 572,384 71],4W e Standby power Reliability Modlns,J33-1 4,049,700 993,015 3,056,655 4,049,700 7. Flow Management B Reliability a Outfall Flour Meter Replacement, LW 852,5W 49 6 W3,224 85215100 L L Section 3-Page 4 L CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year it For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 199940 1999-00 199900 1999-00 Estimated Actual Remaining Projected Outlay @9l30199 outlay outlay 8. Safety&Security lrnpnwements a Co nfinsd Space Personnel Rebiwal System,J49 292,600 - 292,60D 292,800 b Fire Alann&Secunty System Upgmde,J57 49,300 2,061 47.239 49,300 W 9. Wometlon Management&Corrputedzation a Warehouse Bar Code Evalua0on 112,000 16.139 95,651 112,000 b Computoraed Fec Records and Dag.Sys.,J-2&1 732.600 46,619 685,981 732,500 c Intemet Application Deveibpment 147.100 38,860 108,220 147,100 r d Nehwnk Backbone Upgrade Continuation 625,200 38,588 586,612 U52M e Fiber Optic Upgrades 512,100 98 512,002 512,1W I O.Mecellaneous&Support Projects r a Modifns to Existing Mechanical System,J62 1,082,400 7,532 1,074,858 1,022,400 b Facilities Engineering Projects,FEJ 1,DD0,0D0 71,996 928,004 1,000,0D0 c Odor Control Proc RehaNRefmb.,J-71 105,0D0 8.814 98,186 105,OD0 d Tunnels Structural Integrity and Cover Rehab.,J55 378,8D0 2.583 376,217 378,800 r e Chlorine Bldg Mach Equip Demolition,J60 175,100 471 174,629 175,100 f Infometion Technology Triton,Addi9on,Ml 369.900 1,518 358,382 369,900 g Small Capital Equipment Replacement Pojed 160,000 63,448 96,552 160.OD0 11.Water Management Projects r a Groundwater Replenishment System,J36 2,767,400 183,554 2,683,846 2,767,400 12.Plant Automation a Plant ReinveiNONAutomatlan Project,J42 5,492,000 800,031 4,691,999 5,49$OOD b Power Monitoring and Control Sydene,J-3-3 817,600 1.847 815,753 817,600 r SubTctal -Interplant&Joint 29,325,700 2,946,442 26.379,258 29,325,700 SYb-Total - Major projects 0.685,800 5,239.433 50,446,367 55,665,110D Special Projects r t Primary Treat enl a Emulsion Poryment Make-down Unit Upgrede 100,000 - logo00 100,0D0 2. Solids Handling&Digestion a Ball Press Automation 173.000 64 M935 173,000 r b Biosolids ClassASBng Assasonant 110,0DO - 110,000 110.000 c Siosolids Management Site Aopuisilion 50,100 - 50,10D 60.100 3. Be"&Security lmprovemeMS a Security System Improvements 405,800 2270 403,530 405.800 r 4. Process Related Spedal Projects a Effluent Sampler ImpMemerts 100,0D0 - 100,000 100,000 5. IntomeBon Management a Automation Report Publishing 58,1700 - 68,000 55,000 r b CN=PrognmM n9 198,700 1.173 197,527 IM700 c Document Management 264,9W 41,288 223,612 284,9OO d Data Integration 1,251,200 146.812 1,104,388 1,251,200 e Source Control Programming 206,2D0 24.384 181,816 206,200 r f Strategic Information Arohitedure(SIN 378,700 18,495 350,204 378,700 g Geographic lntomrelion System 187,600 2571 185,029 187.600 h Intranet Application Development 58,100 - 58.100 58,100 r I SCAM Communications-Ethernet Study 161,90D - 161,900 161,9D0 J VoloaVata Building Rev4rirg 142,100 47,779 94,321 142,100 k Nelxork Test Facility 31,800 2,182 29,618 31,800 I Year 2000 Data Change 1,365,400 365,754 999,646 1,335,400 r m WMe,a 200D Om.System Upgrade Plot 154,900 1.679 153,321 154,900 n Field Fiber Optic Temuns Standardization 266600 - 288.60D 263,600 o Replacement of lntemplent Fiber Optics 75,400 - 75.400 75,400 p Financial Infometlon System 509,800 50,658 469,142 509.800 r q Records Management Program 224,8W - 224,800 224,800 r Section 3-Page 5 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 L 199940 1999-00 199300 1999-00 E ahvl Actual Remaining Projected Outlay @913/99 OW, Outlay L 6. Miscellaneous&Support Projects a Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 446,200 4,545 441,655 446.200 b Ravislon of Standard Specifications,J44 262,200 63,899 198,301 2OZ200 L+ c ShelvinWArohMng 30,000 - 30,000 301000 d Office Equipment 7.500 - 7,500 7,500 a Portable Storage Building 9,500 - 9,500 9,500 f Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase 1 70,100 - 70,100 70,100 u g Ocean Monitoring Dalebeca-Phase ll 50,im - 50,1m 50,100 7. Straegic B Master Planning a Strategic Pan-Phaea3,3403 222,600 13,960 200,640 222,600 b Strategic Pan Pmgw E3R J4O4 409,500 153,532 255,958 409.500 u e Plant 0&M Manual&SO.P.Project,Phase 1 220,00D - 220,000 220,000 6. Water Management Projects a Water Con oration Coop-Tout Retrofit Pgm,.L72 400,000 1,622 398.378 400,000 b Watershed Consultant Servics 150,000 - 150,000 160.000 u 9. Research&Development a Special Pmlectsfor FY1999.2000 1,397,800 1,367,000 1,245,576 - Sub-Total-Special Project IDUZ300 842,588 9,179,732 10,000278 L Equipment Items; Z964,200 801,792 2,152,408 2,954.200 Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 68,772,300 6,90,793 61,788,W7 68,6W,278 Construction in Progress Completed at 6130199 205,713 (206,7131 Lu�l Total Collections,TR.et,oM and Disposal Project 92,401.500 101897,Mo 81,603,971 92,401,500 LJ 1 L L Yrl L J U Section 3-Page 6 W CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Current Total Approved W30199 Year Projected Remaining r Project Accumulated Projected Coat at Future Budget Cost Cost M30/00 Budget Collection%r Wm Immoveinere Prof Revenue Area 1 r a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab., 1.17 7,494,000 53,W3 17.000 70,503 7,423.497 b Miscellerleous Capital lmplovemenb 500,000 15,000 15,00D 4a5,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 7,996,000 53,503 32,0g0 85,503 7,908,497 Revenue Arm 2 r a Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment B Protection,241 31,438,400 318,348 423,8W 74ZI48 30,B96,252 b Santa Am River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2-31 11,853,600 - 210,SW 210.600 11,64 om c Atwood Subtrunk lmplovemarR5,2-50 1,890,1W - 214,000 214,000 1,SM100 d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,964,700 612,W6 1,256,000 1,868,005 96,694 ry a Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Purnp Sir,Abandonment,2-24-1 2,884,900 52.149 1,253,300 1,306,449 1,379,451 f Eudid Relief Irnplovenerlb-Reach W,2-52 12,213,000 - 1,700 1.700 12,211,300 g Miscellaneous Capital Improvernenls 2,000,000 - SD,000 6D,000 1,940,000 h Trunk Sewer Mapping Pmject 124,700 - 80,400 80,400 44,3D0 r i Carbon Canyon Darn Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2-21-1 6.008.800 253,8110 263,600 4.745,200 j Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 2,634,500 87,131 63,800 150,931 2,483,569 Sub.Total-Revenue Arm2 71,812,700 1,089,034 3,827,200 4,896,834 65,915,8m Revenue Arm 3 r a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Systam Rmtll 1.338-1 11,636,600 1.389.965 4.825.900 6.21505 5,320,735 b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Saner In Western Ave.,3.9.1 21Z300 138,252 7Q0D0 214,252 (1,952) c Seal Beach Bl la amPtor Manhole Rehab.,3.11R 460,000 26,277 252.755 279,032 180.955 d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,335R 10,352,000 117,833 3,437,800 3,555,433 6.798,567 r e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000,000 - 60,000 Si 1.940.000 f Rehabilitation of Outlying Purr@ Stations,237 3,689,300 121.983 89,400 211,383 3.476.917 g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 157,900 101,900 101,9D0 56.000 Sub-Total•Revenue Am 3 28,407,100 1,794.310 8'"3,555 10.637.865 17,769,235 Revenue Arm5 a Relocation of Lido Pump Station,5-41-1 3,395,200 2,826,785 332,60D 3,159,385 236,815 b Replacement of Bad%Bay Trunk Serer,6-46 8,093.800 16,278 950,400 966,678 7.127,122 r c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000,000 - 61 SD,000 1,940,000 d Purr station SCADA CommuniCOUM Study 80,500 75,550 fleam 156.050 (76.650) e Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 7,376,700 243,965 176,SW 422.465 6,954=5 f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 20,800 13.40D 13,40D 7,400 r Sub-Total-Revenue Arm5 20,967,000 3,162,578 1,615,40D 4,777,978 16,189,022 Revenue Arm 6 a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 3.594,900 2,789,702 S58,90D 3.648.602 (53,702) b Miscellaneous Capital lmPmvernenta 50Q000 - 15,000 15,000 485,000 r c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 1.580,700 52ZM 38,200 90,479 1,490,221 d Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 16.600 10700 10,700 5,900 Sub'robd-Revenue Atm6 5,692,200 2.841,981 M218M 3,764,781 1.927,419 Revenue Area 7 r a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stakes,237 8,693,900 287,530 =300 495,830 8,198,070 b Racquat Hill Purr@ Station Abandonment.7-143 204,600 - 204,600 204,600 - c Tustin ArbaSeAnnsrong Subhunk Sawar,7-27 9,654,400 198,471 140,900 339,371 9,315,029 d Gisler-Radhill Think Relocation,7-32 5,906,500 5,934 129,900 135,834 5,770,GW r e Orange Trunk lrrprovemeMs,739 3,942.500 - 55.20D 66,200 3,887,300 f Gister-Redhill Trunk Irrlplovanents,Reach W 736 4,025.700 - 365,800 365,80D 3,659,900 g RA-6"6'Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Repl.,7-28 417,40D 39,361 357,700 397,051 20,339 h Gisler-RatlhilVNonh Trunk Improvements.741 5,704,100 - 350,700 350,700 5.353.400 'r i MLacellaneous Capital lrriprovements 2,000,000 - 148,769 148,789 1,851,231 j Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7-21 5,412,700 77,966 188,600 265,586 5,146,134 It Pumpstation SCADA Cgmlminigdorw Study 78,100 - 78,100 78,100 - I Trunk Sewer Mapping Pmject 24,900 16,100 16.100 8.500 wb Sub-Total-Revenue Arm7 46,064.800 60l= 22A4,689 2,8.53,931 43.210,869 r Seclion 3-Page 7 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 LI Current Total Approved 613DI99 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Costal Future L Budget Cost Cost 6130100 Budget Revenue Areal l a Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment,l l-23 538,700 54,028 446,200 500,228 38.472 b Goidenwasl Trunk Sewer Replacement,11-17.3 3,920,400 105771 2.679,300 2,6B5,071 1,235,329 c Hall Avenue Interceptor,11-20 4,072,900 99,5W 2,565,800 2,565,365 1,407,535 d Warne Avenue Relief Sever,11-22 4,027,700 446,00D 446.000 3,581,700 e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000.000 - 60,000 60,000 1,940,ODD f Rehabllita8on of Outlying Pump Stations,237 2,371,100 78.417 57,400 135,817 2,235,283 g Pumpslation SCADA CommunIcations Study 73,100 - 78,100 78,100 h Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 41,600 25,800 28,800 14,800 Sub-Total•Revenue Area 11 17,060,500 337,781 6,259.600 6.507,361 10,463,119 Revenue Area 14 1r� a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 200.000 6,000 6,000 194,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Amalfi 200,000 6,000 61000 194,OD0 Total Collection System ILI' Impiovemerd Projects 198.188.300 9,869,049 23,751,224 33,620.273 164,555,027 L Treatment lant No Protects ReReclamationn Plant No.1 1. Preliminary Treabnant a Headworks No.2 Pump Imp.&Ovemaul 200,200 - 200.200 2DO,200 - b Sunflower P.S.Dme Replacement P162 407,400 18,6u 389,8DO 408,454 (1,054) c Gin Chamber Modifications,Pi69 141,800 - 107,800 107,800 34,000 2. Primary Tre3bnent a Primary Treahlent72MGDExpenston,P1-37 76,450,100 1,012.186 2,440,000 3,462,196 71,997,914 b Prmary Effluent Pumping Automation 171,800 11,528 171,8W 183,328 (11,528) 3. Secondary Treatment a Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P136.2 40,800,000 39,322.288 687,200 40,OD9,488 790512 b Rehabilitate Four Trickling Filters,Pi-76 %WD,0D0 - 10,500 10,500 9,489:500 LI c Fee Trickling FiHe Cladfiels,P1.77 11,500,0D) - 10,500 10,500 11.489.500 4. Solids Handling&Notation a Me animl Seals on High Rate Dgesler MM,SP30 517,000 130,127 425,000 555,127 (38,127) V b Dawatering Bell Pri ss Rebuild 626,800 - 173,800 173,800 353,000 S. utility Systems a Chemical Facility ModBns,P146-2 4,235,300 685,308 2,531,60D 3,216,908 1.018,392 I b Elect.Facility ModNns&Safety Upgredes,P140.1 442.900 231,923 57,100 289.023 153,877 L.I Transfer to Project Below (12.500) - (12,50D) (12,500) - Alarm Beacons for Venting of Gas Holder 12,500 2.573 12,500 15,073 (2.573) 6. Safety&Security Improvements a Seismic Reboflt of Four SWctunes, P1444 1,329,000 2,673,014 934,700 3,607,714 (2,278,714) 7. Miscellaneous&Support Prgeds a Facifities Engkwsnrg Projects,FE-PI 20,000,000 6D4.362 1,000,000 1.604,352 18,396,638 SuleTobd -Reclamation Plant l 165,22Z300 44,691,953 9,140,000 53,831,953 111,390,337 TrembnaM Pled No.2 u 1. Preliminary Treabrenl a HeradsoMS Pump fnlprvnd&Overhaul,SP-32 300.000 83,808 216,500 310,408 (10,408) b Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,000 - 209,000 209,000 - L.( c Headworkslmprovemens@Plare2,P266 14,708.000 42,792 627.400 670,192 14,137,808 Transfer to"ad Below - _ - - Replacement of Ban:aeen Influent Gate,P263 - 5,032 - 5.032 (6,032) 2. Primary Treatment a Rehab D&E Clarifier SweepArms 68,2DO - 68,20D 68.200 - Y� Section 3-Page 8 L' y CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life �r For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 Current Taal Approved W30M Year Projected Remaining yi Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost 8130I00 Budget 3. Secondary Treatment a DA R Support Rail Replacement 88,000 - 65,000 65,000 - 4. Solds Handling&Digsallon a Dmearing Belt Press Rebuild,SP-37 825,000 55,970 252.300 308.270 516,730 b Sludge Gdnder Replacementifthab,SIP-36 224,000 - 65,500 55,500 168,500 c Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 22,011.500 1,236,114 6,441,200 7,677,314 14,381,186 d G-1,G-2 Conveyor Bak Rehab 41,800 - 41,800 41,800 - e Solids Storage Facility at Plan 2,P260 18,324,9W 693,362 4.481,500 5,174,862 13.160.038 5. Wlity Systems a High Pressure Compressed Alr System P261 560,000 61.841 488,600 550,941 9,559 to MotllMa te Dec.&CorNol System%P247-1 2,887,900 701,005 1,546.800 2.247,805 "0'095 c Gas Compressor Redundancy.P2-79 499,800 60 439.200 439,290 60,540 d 11111&le9 Rehab&Refurbishment 1,000,000 - 13,000 13,000 987,000 V 6. Flow Management&Reliability a Peak Flaw Management,J67 3.640,000 3,994 57,700 61,694 3,578,306 7. Process Related Spacial projects a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33,400 - 33,400 33,400 - & Infommtbn Management a DAFT Hardeare and Software Upgrade,SP-21 180,000 - 109,600 109,600 70.400 9. MISMImeous&Support Projects a WamhoaseQPlan No.2,P265 1,598,000 912,411 861,000 1,773,411 (175,411) ar b Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-P2 20,O(Ki 525,268 1,000,000 1,525,258 18,474,732 c Tunnel Ughting&Monitoring Rehab.,J65 459,500 312.400 312,400 147,100 Sub-Tobl -Treatment Plant 87,483,000 4,331.757 17,220.100 21,551,857 65,931,143 Interplant and Joint Faeilldec r 1. Collection Facilities a Collection Facilities Depot,J-10.1 1,534,100 - 1,524,300 1,524,300 9,800 to Bushan Trunk Seder Rehab.,1-24 32,803,500 43,798 59,700 103,498 32,700,002 _ c SSOTRIning Facility 63,803 - 20,400 20,400 43,400 d CO-Op Projects,1n8me/01i&Reduction,J-73 150,010,000 - 3,475,400 3,475,400 146,534.600 Transfer to Project Below (40.000) - (40,000) (40,000) - Nueence Flux DlversM Fee at Newport Dunes 40,000 - 40.000 40,000 as a Rehab&Upgrade of EMs Ave.Pump Station,1-10 1,799.500 61,100 61.100 1.735,400 2. Headworlu a New Gn Augara,J62 1,210,000 42.097 1,073,600 1,115.697 94,303 3. Secondary Treatment y a Sae.Treatment Monti.&Ctn System Upgrade,J-314 4,316,000 459,644 34.000 493,644 3,&22,356 4. Ocean Oubit Systems a Irneatigation and Repaid of Ocean Outbll,J-39 1,274,600 912.464 235,400 1,147.864 126,736 b Foster Rehab.&Refurbishment.J-59 26,200,000 - 150,900 150,800 28,049.200 ar S. Utility Systems a Can Gen Engine Alr Emission Monhaing Sys 564,200 166,166 431,600 597,786 (33.586) b Cen Gen Ak Compressor Conuollerllpgrad8 25.100 - 25,100 25,100 - c ImprvbCenbal GemmUon8brbrg Air System,J63 140.700 7,223 122,700 129,923 10,777 d Modea,of Can Gen Waste Hen Boilers.J64 200,000 5,879 195,000 200.979 (879) 6. Electrical Power Systems a Am Classiecetions Studies,Pisste 1&2,J-3rM 1.145.000 594,198 465,300 1.059,498 85,502 b Cable Tray lmpmvemente,J47 12,750,000 408.711 999,700 1,408,411 11,341,589 c Electrical Power System Singbll Ia Diagrams.J-2" 3,367,500 12,900 12,9W 3,364,600 d Electrical Poser System Studies,J-254 3,215,500 967.796 717,400 1,685,195 1,530,304 e Standby Power Reliability Modfns,J-33-1 17,370.100 1,559,865 4.049,700 51609.565 11,760,535 7. Flow Management&Reliability a Gutian Flow Meter Repbanen,J66 924.000 7,639 852.500 860,139 63,861 r Section 3-Page 9 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life I ! For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 L.I current Total Approvod 110100 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Protected costal Fo me Budget cost Cost cost at Budget S. Safety 8 Sewriry Impmvertwna a Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J49 423,000 23,994 292,600 316,594 106,406 1 b Fire Atanm 8 Seau6y System Upgrade,J-57 627,000 612,064 49,30D 661,364 (34,364) 9. Information Managemerd 8 CompldeaQatien a Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 112,000 16,139 112,000 126,139 (16.139)to Computerized Fao Records and Dwg.Sys.,J-25-1 4.956,300 894,482 732,600 1.627,082 3.329,218 c Intemet Applicatw Devebpmerd 382.200 96,579 147.100 243.679 138,521 U d Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 1,439,000 665.125 625200 1,290,325 148.675 e Fber Optic Upgrades 660.000 241,120 51$100 753220 (9309) 10. Miscellaneo s 8 Support Projects I a Mod6ns to Existing Mechanical System,J-62 2,694,200 217.663 1,OBY,9O0 1,300,063 1,V4.137 u b Facilities Engine n"Projects,FEJ 20,ODO,ODO 750,153 1,000,000 1.750.153 18249,047 c Odor Control Pmc.ReheWRefurb.,J-71 5.337,Oo0 - 105,000 105,000 5=000 of Tunnels Struttaal Integrity and Cover Rehab.,155 426.300 43.001 378AW 421,801 4,499 1 e Chlorine Bldg Merin Egndp Demolition,J-W 210.700 27.241 175.100 202.341 8" 6d f Information Technology Trailers AddNon,J-61 397,100 27.416 359,900 397.316 (216) g Small Capital Equipment Replacement project 240,000 99.728 160,000 259,728 (19,728) 11. Water Management Pmjems I a Grountlwato RePlehabnsnt System.J-36 121,924,700 797.682 2,767,400 3,565,062 118.359.638 as, 12. Plant Automation a Plant Reimention/Aaom lion Pmjed,J42 25.760,400 2.215,658 5,49ZOOD 7.707.666 18.OR732 b Power Monitoring and Control Systems,Ja33 4.047.300 692 817,600 818282 3229.00B SuRToat -InterplantBJoint 45Q550,800 11,904227 29,325.700 41229,927 409,320.873 led Sub-Total - MajorProjecls 703=101) 60.927.947 65,685,800 116.613.747 588,642,353 Special Projeels 1. Prtrmry Treatment V a Emndshn Potyment MakeEovm Lhft Upgrade 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 - 2. Solids Handling 8 Dgestion a Beft Press Automation 175.000 8,502 173,ODO 181,502 ASIM j b Bmsolids ClassASSng Assessment 110.000 - 110,000 110.000 - L c Siosolids Maragement See AcquisNon 50,100 - 50,100 50,100 - 3. Safety 8 Seventy Impovements a Sewny System Improvements 1.33ZOW 353.499 405.800 769299 553.501 I 4. Process Related Special Projects L a Effluent Sampler Improvements 100,000 - 100,OD0 100,000 - 5. Information Management a Automation Report Publishing 195.000 58.579 SB.00D 116,579 78,421 I b CMMS Programming 490,000 Z71,430 198,70D 470,130 19,870 u c Dcmmmrt Management 800,000 296.M 254,900 551,179 2311,821 d Daa Integration 4.334,000 1,651,848 1251200 2.903,048 1,430.952 e Source CoMml Programming 576,000 304.378 2DS= 510,578 65,422 I f Strategic Into... ArehBecove(SIA) 724,000 221,807 378.70D Ill 123.493 u g Geographic Information System 874,000 49,857 187,600 237,457 636,543 h Intranet Application Development 23SAM 74,322 58,100 132.422 103.173 1 SCADA Communications-Ethemat Study 161.900 - 161,900 161,900 j j VoiceJDaa Bldlding Rewiring 680,100 486,903 142,100 629,003 51,097 LI k Network Test Facility 125.000 81.459 31AM 113259 11,741 1 Year 2000 Data Change 3,465.400 1,909.688 1,355,40D 3.275268 190,112 m Windows 2000 Ops.System Upgrade Pilot 154.90D - 154.900 154.900 - 6I n Field Fiber Optic Termnal Standardization 324,700 82,030 268,600 3%630 (M.930) o Replacement of lntenglard Fiber Optice 498.500 - 75,400 75,400 4Z3,100 P Financial lnlametion System 2,958,000 2.307.522 509,8130 2,817,322 140,US q Records Management Program 266.000 - 224,800 224.S00 30200 I I y Section 3-Page 10 I ' u CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project LUe r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 currenrt TOM Approved GrW99 Year P -jeched Remaining r Project Accanulated Projected CON at Future Budget Coat cost 930M Budget 6. Miscellaneous 8 Suppon Pmjecs a Scrubber Cherndcal Fcetl System Mad. 812200 113,801 446,200 659,a01 252,399 r b Revision of Standard Specifications,3-44 439,700 251.425 282,200 513.625 (73.925) c Shelviig/Avchiving 30,000 - 30.000 30.000 - d 0"Equipment 7,91W - 7.500 7,500 - e portable Stoage Building 9.500 - 9.500 9,501) - r t Cman Mondoring Database-Phased 70,100 - 70.100 70,10D g Oman Mondoning Database-Phase It 50.100 - 50,100 50,100 - 7. Strategic 8 Master Planning a Strategic Plan-Phase3,3403 2193,700 1,051 222600 2079,701 113.999 'N b Stategic Pan Progrem FJR J-404 1,120,10D 541.714 409,500 9512t4 168.886 c Plant O 6 M Manual 8 S.O.P.Project,Phase 1 230.000 - 220,000 220,000 10,000 8. Water Managermnt Projects a Water Consenvabon COOp-Tgdet Reto8l PgMJ-72 4,644,OOD 252102 400.000 652,102 3.991,898 r b Watemned Consultant Semms Vill - 150,000 150,000 - 9. Research 5 Development a Special Projects M FY 1999-20DO 1.9B7AW 1245AM 1,245AM 1220024 _ Sub-Totdl Speclsl Projects 29844,SW 11,184298 10.0D0,276 21,184,522 8.659,978 Bi ulprrerd Mann 48,984 29542W 2,964�2W 46,0004000 Total Treatment 8 DkPosal Projects 78ZOKOW 72112193 68,650276 140,71 641,302,331 combucdon in Progress Competed at 6/30/99 51,1133.5010 51,933,550 (51,833.550) r Total Collect...,Treabncnn and Disposal Projects still W 133,814,792 92,401,500 228,216292 754,036.806 r Section 3—Page 11 1999-00 First Quarter Report L L i u L L L J This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L L u L u Section 3—Page 12 L Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Ooeratina Budget Review r 199900 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Dare Budget Date Budget %of Budget r REVENUES: Tax AJlocatlons/Subventions(Share of l%) 32,861.000 1,920,832 30,940,166 5.85% Connection Fees 5.187,000 447,101 4,739,899 8.62% „r Other Fees 74.301,000 584,974 73,716,326 0.79% Sale of Capacity Rights 198,000 - 196,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 26,778,000 4,096,538 22,681,462 15.30% ,r Other Fees - 15,795 (15,795) - TotalRevenues 139,323,000 7,064.940 132.258,060 5.07% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treabnent Plant 68,771,000 7,190,508 61,580,494 10.46% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 23,629,000 3,707,023 19,921.977 15.69% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 41,690,000 17,055,534 24,634,486 40.91% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 44,000,000 12,009,197 31,990,813 27.29% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,356.500 1,847,259 7,509,231 19.74% r Total Outlays 187,446,500 41,809,519 145,636,981 22.30% r Coital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance r 711799 &Atlditions Fixed Assets 9/30/99 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Areas'Construction in Progress 41,359,189 3,707,023 - 45,066212 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 68,714,703 7,190,506 - 75,905209 Sub-Total 110,073,892 10.897.529 - 120,971.421 r COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 2,675267 - - 2,675,267 r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 302,933,274 - - 302,933.274 Treatment Facilities 19.922 - - 19,922 Disposal Facilities 101.528 - - 101,528 r General Plant and Adrdnistrative Facilities 885,732 - 855.732 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 783,840,05E - - 783,840,058 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 44,434 - - 44,434 ,r Sub-Total 1,090,500.215 - - 1,090,500215 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 1200,574,107 10,897,529 - 1,211,471,636 r Section 4-Page 1 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Revenue Area No.1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date u Budget Date Budget %of Budget I REVENUES: L Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) 1,859,000 388.874 1,470,126 20A2% Connection Fees 455.000 (45) 455.045 -0.01% Other Fees 8,410,000 11,157 8,398,843 0,13% L Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,549,000 174,932 1,374,068 11.29% 1 Other Fees - - - - L Total Revenues 12.273,000 574,918 11.698,082 4.68% L OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tnatrnent Plant 7,661,000 797,427 6,863.573 10.41% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 32,000 14,778 17.222 46.18% L COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 5,848,000 2,159,400 3,688,600 36.93% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,699,000 1,269,768 3,429,232 27.02% Revenue Arm Operating&08rer Expenses 599.000 163,580 435,420 27.31% L Total Outlays 18,839,000 4,404,953 14,434,047 23.38% L Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L 7/1199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in P - L Progress 53,575 1a,778 68,353 Share of Joint Works Trealment Plant CIP 7,620,461 797,427 - 8.417,888 Sub-Total 7,674.036 812,205 - 8,486,241 L COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 61.398 L Collection Lines and Pump Stations 6,903,000 - - 6,903,000 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 General Plant and Adnunistrative Facilities 58,241 - - 58,241 L Equity in Jant Treatment Facilities 86,894,517 - - 86,894,517 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - - Sub-Total 93,948,749 - - g3,948,749 U Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 101.622.785 812,205 - 102,434,990 L L Section 4 -Page 2 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Opera t na Budget Review 1999-00 Year-To Remaining Year-ToAate Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax AllarationslSuoventions(Share of l%) 10,064,000 539,334 9,524,666 5.36% Correction Fees 2,002,000 (315,620) 2,317,620 -15.77°h ,r OBmr Fees 23,910,000 354,599 23,555,401 148% Sale of Cape*Rights 148,000 - 148,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 8,181,000 1,283,683 6,897,317 15.69% r Other Fees - 15,051 (15,051) - Total Revenues 44,305,000 1,877,047 42,427,953 4.241/6 r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint N6rks Treatment Plant 20,150,000 2,138,455 18,01116" 10.61% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construrbm 3,827,000 577,091 3,241 1508% r COP/Bond Relionerd and lydenst Experse 13,188,000 5,797,912 7,390,088 43.96% Share of Joint Woks Operating Eqeenses 13,737,000 3,871,895 9,865.105 28.19% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,688,000 549,163 2,138,847 20A3% Total Outlays 53,590,000 12,934,507 40,655,493 24.14% r Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress 2,484,196 577.091 - 3,061,287 Share of Joint Works Treatrnent Plant CIP 20,435,753 2,138,456 - 22,574.209 SubTotal 22,919.949 2,715,547 - 25,635,4% COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and property Rights 517,694 - - 517,694 r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 96,923,040 - 96,9M.040 Treahrcrd Facilities - ' Cispoeal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172 r General Plant and Adrdr strative Facilities 218,549 - 218,60 Equity in Joint Treatrrerd Facilities 233,024,296 - - 233,024298 Ot er Assets at Cost less Amortization 1,125 1.125 Sub-Total 330,717,876 - - 330,717,876 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 353,637,825 2,715,547 - 356,353,372 r r Section 4-Page 3 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Revenue Area No.3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review L l 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Yr Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: L Tax Alloraeons/Subventions(Sham of l%) 10,902,000 528.673 10,373,327 4A5% Connection Fees 1,274,000 139,293 1,134,707 10.93% Other Fees 23,013,000 86,618 22,926,382 0.38% L Sale of Capacity Rights _ - - _ Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 8,447,000 1,382,874 7,064,126 16.37% 1 Other Fees - - - - L Total Revenues 43,636,000 2,137,458 41.498.542 4.90% L OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 21,292,000 2,216,114 19,075,11M 10.41% Revenue Area Trunk Serer Construction 8,810.000 2,254,052 6,525.938 25.93% L COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 12.393.000 5,194.328 7,198,674 41.91% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,196,000 3,505,605 9.690,395 26.57% Revue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,349,000 392.713 1,956,287 16.72% L Total Outlays 58,040,000 13,592,820 44,447,180 23.42% L Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adusbnents Transfer to Balance L 711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress 12.323.104 2.284,062 - 14,607,168 L Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 21,177,871 2.216.114 - 23.393,985 Sub-Total 33,500,975 4,500,176 - 38,001.151 j 6.1 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 280,231 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 70,577,818 - - 70,577,818 L Treatment Facilities 919M - - 9,M2 Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28419 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 320,153 - - 320:153 u Equity in Joint Treatrent Facilities 241,486,220 - - 241,488,220 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization _ Sub-Total 312,702,763 - - 312,702,763 V Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 346,203,738 4,500,176 - 350,703,914 II L Section 4- Page 4 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operatna Budget Review r 1999-00 YearTo- Remaining Year-TcOae Budget Date Budget %of Budget r REVENUES: Tax AllocafiordSubventions(Sham of 1%) 3,014,000 146,123 2,867,877 4.85% Connection Fees 364,000 2,242 361,758 0.62% ,r 09W Fees 2,482,000 - Z46Z000 0.00% Sale of Capacity Rights _ _ - _ Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,724,000 305,729 1,418,271 17.73% r (Other Fees _ _ _ _ Total Revenues 7,564,000 454,094 7,109,906 6.OD% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Woft Treatrrent Plant 2,785,OOD 290,496 2,494,504 10.43% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 1,615,000 287,475 1,327,525 17.80% r COP/Band Refirement and Interest Expense 1,820,000 1.093,444 726,556 60.08% Share of Joint Waft Operating Expenses 1,734,000 490,926 1,243,074 28.31% r Revenue Am Operating&Other Expenses 890,500 146,474 744,026 16.45% Total Outlays 8,844,500 2.308,815 6,535.685 26.10% Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjusbreft Transfer to Balance 7/1199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: r Pe nue Area Constriction in Progress 4,907,830 287,475 - 5,195,305 Share of Joint Wurks Treabrerd Plant OF 2,776,074 290.496 - 3,066,570 Sub-Total 7,683,904 577,971 - 8,261,875 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Properly Rights 69,740 - - 69,740 r Collection tines grid Punp Stations 34,299,567 - - 34,299,567 Treahnent Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347 Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115 r 0eneml Plant and Adn it istralim Facilities 39,402 - 39,402 Equity in Joint Treatrnent Facilities 31,655,177 - - 31,655.177 Other Assets at Cost Less Arrodiza8on _ _ _ - Sub-Total 66,078,348 - - 66,078,348 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 73,762,252 577.971 - 74,340.223 r Section 4-Page 5 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Revenue Area No.6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review y For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-Tom Li Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: 11.'I Tax Allorations/Subventons(Sham of l%) 1382,000 60,315 1,321.685 4.36% Connection Fees 91,000 12,149 78,851 13.359% t Other Fees 3,593,000 25,418 3,567,582 0.71% L Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&N4soellaneous Receipts 1,481,000 222,395 1,258,605 15.02% Other Fees - 175 (175) - Total Revenues S547,000 320,452 6,226.548 4.89% V OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Woft Treatment Plant 2,558,000 266,049 2,291,951 10.40% Revenue Area Trunk Sevxr Construction 923.000 142,897 780,103 15.48% L COPMond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,457,000 647,201 809,799 44.42% Share of Jam V%bft Operating Expenses 1,742,000 501,811 1,240.189 28.81% Revenue Area Operatrg&Other Expenses 262,500 66,362 196,138 25.28% L Total Outlays 6,942,500 1,624,320 5,318,180 23.40% Id Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustrrents Transterto Balance L 711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: f Revenue Area Construction in Progress 6,603.8-12 142.897 - 6,746,769 y Steve of Jdnt Mft Treahrent Rant CIP 2,542.444 266.049 - 2.808.493 Sub-Total 9,146,316 408,946 - 9,555,262 V COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rghts 562 - - 582 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 5,153,761 - - 5,153,761 L.r Treatment Facilities 2,653 - - Z653 Disposal Facilities 7,394 - - 7,394 General Rant and Adninishative Facilities 113,761 - - 113,761 y Equity in Joint Treahrent Facilities 28,991,098 - - 28,991.098 Other Assets at Cost Less Armdvation _ _ _ _ Sub-Total 34,269,229 - - 34,289,229 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 43,415.50 408,946 - 43.824.491 L L Section 4-Page 8 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review d 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget ,r REVENUES: Tax AlloptiorslSuhrventions(Share of l%) 3,293,000 147,150 3,145,850 4ArA Connection Fees 384,000 170,412 193,588 46.ffi% r Other Fees 7,367A00 77,534 7,289,488 1.050/0 Sale of(ape*Right - - - - Interest&Msodlaravus Receipts 2,170,WD 274,350 1,895,620 12.649% r Other Fees - 569 (589) - Total Revenues 13,194,000 670,045 12,523,955 E08% r OUTLAYS: Share of Joird Wake Treatrrmt Plant 7,180,000 746,375 6,433.625 10.4(r/ r, Revenue Area Tau&Sewer Construction 2,156,000 245,325 1,910,674 11.38% COPIBond RedrertleM and Interest Expense 3,577,000 1,1611053 2,415,347 32.489/ Share of Joint Nbdrs Operating Expenses 4,488,000 1,199,014 3,288,SW 26.729/6 r, Revenue Am Operating&Other Eqensas 1,422,500 285,659 1,136.831 20.08% Total Outlays 18,823,500 3,638,037 15,185,463 19.33% Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Trarsferto Balance T11f99 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: r Revenue Am Construction in Progress 6,940,555 245,326 - 7,185,881 Share of Joint Ndks Treatrent Plats CIP 7,132,586 746,375 - 7,878,961 Sub•Total 14,073,141 991,701 - 15,064,842 r CONPLEIED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQ IPNENT: Land and Properly Ri" 1,578,656 - - 1,678,658 Collection lines and Pump Stations 41,248,462 - - 41,248,462 Treetrywrt Facilities - - - - DisposalFacilities 10,782 - - 10,782 r General Plat and Admnistrative Facilities 98,197 - - 98,197 Equity In Joint Treatment Failities 81,331,301 - - 81,331,301 Other Assets at Cost Less Anortizalion 43,309 - - 43,309 r Sub-Total 124,310,707 - - 124,310,707 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 138,383,848 991,701 - 139,375,549 r r Section 4- Page 7 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report 61 Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: y Tax Allocabons/Subvendons(Share of 1%) 2,347,000 110,363 2.236,637 4.70% Connection Fees 364,000 277.246 86,754 76.17% Other Fees 4.693,000 27,297 4,665,703 0.58 Sale of Cape*Rights 48.000 - 48,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,810,000 267.908 1,542,092 14.80% 1 � Other Fees - - - - G Total Revenues 9,282,000 682.814 8,579,186 7.37% i OUTLAYS: v Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 4,539,000 468,102 4,070,898 10,31% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,280,000 166,394 6,104,606 2.48% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,220.000 927.506 2,292.494 28.80% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,688,000 723,327 1,964,673 26.91% Revenue Area Opemting&Other Expenses 904.500 198.502 705,998 21.95% L Total Outlays 17,611,500 2,472,831 15,138,669 14.04% L Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Tmnsferto Balance L 711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construclion in Progress 7.996,081 155,394 - 8,151,475 L Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 4,473,327 468,102 - 4,941,429 Sub-Total 12.469,408 623.496 - 13,092,904 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 Collection Unes and Pump Stations 19,050,027 - - 19,050,027 L Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 I General Plant and Administrative Facilities 30,682 - - 30,682 L Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 51,008,485 - - 51,008,485 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - - Sub-Total 70,239.233 - - 70,239,233 u Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 82.708,641 623,496 - 83,332,137 L 11 u Section 4- Page 8 V Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review r 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Dale Budget %of Budget r REVENUES: Tax AllocetionsrSubventions(Share of l%) - - - - Connection Fees 273,000 161,424 111,576 59.13% r Other Fees 853,000 - 853,000 0.00% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 732.000 129,902 602,098 17751% r Other Fees - - _ _ Total Revenues 1,a58,000 291,326 1,566,674 15.68% r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 818.000 85,567 732,433 10.46% r Revenue Area Trunk Serer Construction - - - 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 10,766 16,234 39.87% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 532,000 146,951 385,049 2T629% r, Revenue Am Operating&Other Expenses 27,000 10,024 16,976 37.13% Total Outlays 1,404,000 253.308 1,150,692 18.04% r Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711199 &Additiore Fixed Assets 9130199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: r. Revenue Area Construction in Progress - - - - Sham of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 817,705 85.567 - 903,272 Sub-Total 817,705 85,567 - 903.272 r COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights - _ - _ r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3,175,032 - - 3,175,032 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - ..' General Plant and Administrative Facilities - - - - Equity in Joint TreabrentFacilities 9,324,069 - - 9,324,069 Other Assets at Cost Less Anprtization - _ _ - r' Sub-Total 12,499,101 - - 12,499.101 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 13,316,806 85,567 - 13,402,373 r r Section 4-Page 9 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 Operating Budget Review L 1999410 Ybar-To- Remaining Ymr4p4kb t� Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: L Tax AllocationslSubventiors(Share of 1%) - - - - Connection Fees - - - - OfirerFees - 2,051 (2,051) - u Sale of Capacity Rights _ _ _ _ Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 684,000 54,735 629,265 8.00% Other Fees - - - - Total Revenues 684,000 56,786 627,214 8.30% OUTLAYS: L Share of Jolts Works Treatment Plant 1,788,000 181,920 1.606,080 10.17% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,000 - 6,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 160.000 63.326 95.674 39.58% r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,184,000 299,890 884,110 25.33% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 213,500 34,792 178,708 16.30% Total Outlays 3,351,5C0 579,928 2,771,572 17.30% L Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance V 7/1/99 &Additiore Fixed Asses 9/30199 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Arm Construction in Progress 49,976 - - 49,976 V Share of Joint Works Treament Plant CIP 1,738,482 181.920 - 1,920,402 Sub-Total 1,788.458 181,920 - 1,970,378 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: L Land and Property Rights _ _ Collection Lines and Purrg Stations 25,602,567 - - 25,602.567 6. Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Piant and Administrative Facilities 6,747 - - 6,747 L Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 20,124,895 - - 20,124,895 Other Assets at Cost Less AmoNzation _ _ _ _ Sub-Total 45,734,209 - - 45,734,209 b Tool Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 47,522,667 181,920 - 47,704,587 L 4.1 Section 4-Page 10 L Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 1299-00 Through Through 1999-00 Through Increase Budget 9/30199 9130199 Budget 9130198 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves- 1,981,193 1,592,701 2,059.473 (466,772) r Revenues 2. In-Lieu Premiums - - N/A - - - 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 100,000 19,120 19.12% 80,880 31,546 (12,426) 4. Allocation from Other Funds 700,000 62,667 8.95% 637,333 2.833 59,834 r 6. Total Revenues 800,000 81,787 10.22% 718,213 34,379 47.408 r Expenses S. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - WA - - - r 7. Benefits/Claims 165,000 11,446 6.94% 153,555 - 11.445 r 8. Contractual Services 3,500 300 8.67% 3,200 - 300 9. Legal Services 500,000 137,146 27.43% 362,854 69,949 67,197 �r 10. Professional Services 3,000 12,000 400.00% (9,000) - 12,000 11. Supplies&Other 500 0.00% 500 12. Sub-Total Expenses 672,000 160,891 23.94% 511,109 69,949 90.942 13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 27,873 23.23% 92,127 27,873 r 14. Total Expenses 792,000 188,764 23.83% 603.236 97,822 90.942 r 15. Excess Revenue(Expenses 8,000 (108.877) -1337.21% 114,977 (83,443) (43,534) r 16. Ending Reserves* 1,989,193 1.485,724 74.69% N/A 1,996,030 (510,306) `+ •Includes$687,313 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. r r Section 5-Page 1 r 1999-00 First Quarter Report L Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual �+ 199940 Through Through 1999-00 Through Increase Budget W30199 9130199 Budget 9130198 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves* 520.052 812,383 563,272 249,111 V Revenues V 2. In-Lieu Premiums 310,000 77,500 25.00% 232,500 54,750 22,750 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 25,000 9,836 39.34% 15,164 7,990 1,846 4. Total Revenues 335,000 87,336 26.07% 247,664 62,740 24,596 y V Expenses 5. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - WA - - - W 6. BenefdslClaims 225,000 86,567 38.47% 138,433 66,710 19,857 7. Contractual Services 25,000 6,250 25.00% 18,750 - 8,250 S. Legal Services 27,000 5,047 18.69% 21,953 4,863 184 u 9. Professional Services 30,000 25,636 85A5% 4.364 - 25.636 10. Supplies&Other - - WA 583 (583) �.i 11. Sub-Total Expenses 307,000 123,600 40.23% 183,500 72,156 51,344 12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 5,024 22.33% 17,476 5,430 (406) 13. Total Expenses 329,500 128,524 39.01% 200.976 77.586 50,933 1i 14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 5,500 (41.188) -748.87% 46,688 (14,846) (26,342) L. V 15. Ending Reserves' 525,552 771,195 146.74% WA 548,426 222,769 V Includes$139,231 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. L L Section 5- Page 2 1 Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE General Management Administration (Division 110) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Ensure treatment cost does S483WG S544/%iG Costs above Gallonage charge due to lower not exceed target by end of than anticipated flows and unexpected fiscal year expenditures related to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. Ensure District meets 517.25 FTEs by 497.75 FTEs As of 9/30199. adopted 3-year staffing end of fiscal year plan Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. with Permit Compliance Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 10% Expenditures well under target through four- (capital projects)CORE quarters and related to many projects being Budget by end of year in Design phase. See Engineering Section. _ Ensure District Performance 80% 75%Performance Performance objectives have ready been met Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives during the first three months. Workplan milestones met within Objectives 64%Workplan milestone tasks are behind in some areas, targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see largely due to continued Y2K efforts and the Milestones Summary) Huntington Beach Closure Project. Note that with GM approval,a few scheduled workplan tasks were delayed to next fiscal year given appropriate justification. District-Wide Workplan Not Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data First Quarter 77 49 24 4 64%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled for first quarter of FY 99/00 were completed. A few of these tasks were deferred per the General Manager. Please see individual division sections for additional details on activities behind schedule. Section 6 -Page 1 1999-00 First Quarter Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Administration (Division 210) - Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Average Rate of Return 4.78% 5.43% The portfolios outperformed their respective on Liquid Portfolio Index benchmarks. _ Average Rate of Return 4.54% 4.87% The portfolios outperformed their respective on Long-temp Portfolio benchmarks. Index _ Average Interest Rate 2.72% 2.71% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. Paid on variable(COP) Borrowing General liability cost:% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. Premiums compared to .60% .25% Operating Budget _ Workers Comp insurance cost: %premiums 1.50% 1.03% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. compared to Payroll Remain at or under the $44.0 Million by $12 Million over 3 Expenses exceeded 25%'quarterly target" net Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal months(27%total) largely due to the unanticipated expenses _ year associated with the Huntington Beach Closure Project. We will attempt to compensate for these unexpected costs over the next 3 quarters. Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Section 6 - Page 2 Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting (Division 220) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Months Summary of Data Issue monthly financial First month(July) missed which is typical reports within 10 working 92% 67% due to end-of-year processing. We expect days this to be the only month behind schedule. Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 0% This work to be completed in 2nd and 3rd study quarter. Complete Policy and 100%by year end 10% 10%progress with expectation of Procedures Manual completion by years end. Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Section 6 - Page 3 1999-00 First Quarter Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) - Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data Target Through Months Maintain cycle count 97/+Accuracy 98.31% Full-year cycle counting program met program Rating benchmark target. _ Complete by Not started Will be completed by 4th Quarter. Implement Outreach 4/00 Program Implement Procurement Complete by Pilot Program Pilot program initiated. Card Program 2/00 Develop Master Contracts Complete by Initiated Project Contracts currently under tlevelopment. for consultants/services 3/00 Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data — 6 3 g 0 Unexpected retirement of O&M division- head delayed start of tasks. Section 6- Page 4 Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications (Division 310) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target achieved, Turnaround Time 100%of time Board Minute Preparation 10 day 100% Target achieved. Turnaround Time turnaround 100%of time Photocopying Services 93%+ N/A 1 st and 3rd Quarter measurement. Satisfaction Graphics Services 95%* WA 1 St and 3rd Quarter measurement. Satisfaction Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%t 95% Benchmark target exceeded. Rating Workplan Tasks - - N - 1"Quarter complete Behind moot o, Summary of Data - 2 1 0 1 Have not formed special in-house cemminee. Section 6- Page 5 1999-00 First Quarter Report GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (Divisions 4201430") -- Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Summary of Data .� Months Ensure contractor performs 80%-100%of 59%(142,000 ft) Contractor missed work days due to _ within contract guidelines 244,800 linear ft. equipment failures,personnel shortages and for Zone 7line cleaning multiple commitments. Contractor reorganizing and dedicating two trucks to get back on schedule. Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench lime 93% Target exceeded. Pump Stations meets or exceeds target Ensure that collections go%+spots 57% Staff re-directed to Huntington Beach Closure trouble spots are cleaned on Project. maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 77% Target met. Fleet Maintenance Division meets or exceeds target Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 92o Target exceeded. Rebuild Shop meets or _ exceeds target Ensure planned/preventive 75%Planned& 78%Preventive Target met. maintenance to corrective Preventive 22%Corrective maintenance ratios meets Maintenance targets 25%Corective Maintenance Workplan Tasks Not - — 11^Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 3 3 0 Delays on tasks due to Huntington Beach Project and other project complications. *Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6 -Page 6 Performance Objectives HR & EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Divisions 510) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Address employee 90%within 3 97% Target exceeded. development requests days HR Department managed 90-100%of 25%expended through Target met. within budget budget 3 months .. Achieve 3-year staffing plan 517.25 FTFs by 497.75 FTE's through 3 This is well below our end-of-year target. projections years end months Ensure Department 90% 100% Target met. achieves 90,of budget performance objectives Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Starred Summary of Data 6 6 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Section 6-Page 7 1999-00 First Quarter Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Technical Services Administration (Division 610) _ Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Summary of Data Months Ensure divisions' 85%+ 81%(13 of 16) Approaches benchmark target. performance objectives are met. Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 68-120% Division: 610-68%;620-111%; 630— expenditures are managed (annualized) 120%;640-101%;650-80%. Anticipate all budgets will be met by year's end. Grltpl.lf�eX'�8k8ai ixk �J � .h 'SQitarter 7 a.= Complete'+ 8ehlnd a .r yk Y Summary of Data 1 0 1 0 Modified approach and Scope of Work to internal operations study. Section 6- Page 8 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Summary of Data Months Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target met. core ocean monitoring sampling Ensure workplan project 95%of Deadlines 100% Target met. milestones completed on time. Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met. reports/data submitted on time Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met. reported on time. Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 3 3 0 0 Workplan tasks completed_ Section 6- Page 9 1999-00 First Quarter Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data —' Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 127% Target exceeded. 290 tests/FTE/month testing productivity at/above exceeds target of 229 based on benchmark. _ Multi-agency benchmark parameters. Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 114% Target exceeded. 290 tests/FTE/momh testing productivity wilhin none exceeds target of 255 based on last year. 10%of FY 98/99 in-house productivity standard. Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 100%on 1st analysis Target met. 2nd QA analysis not completed on laboratory samples 1st analysis; until 11199. 100%on 2nd Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 90.3% Internal standards established in November, analyses established '98. Turnaround times standard met. norm Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. r Section 6 -Page 10 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control(Division 640) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data '-^ - Maintain field inspection 2-6 monitoring 2.8 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods data is for 4th quarter of FY 98199. Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. actions within 30 days of non-compliance event Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prior to expiration Implement Technical Complete 90+ 80%completed Program slightly behind schedule due to Resource Program of milestones on delay in EPA's review. time Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 1 1 0 Detailed review of draft ordinance behind schedule due to EPA delays. Section 6- Page 11 1999-00 First Quarter Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Safety & Emergency Response (Division 650) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 96% Customer Service remains a division within 2 work days prionty. Ensure Injury Incidence is 8.5 incidence 11.3 This target has not been met due to an 24%below industry rate increase in frequency of less severe average accidents. Additional emphasis being provided on"safe work practices.' Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 5.6 This target has not been met due to an Incidence Rate 42%below rate increase in frequency of accidents industry average requiring time off. Additional emphasis being provided on'safe work practices' Workers Compensation $403 $21 Costs were negligible due to accidents that `. Cost Factor 30%below did occur requiring limited medical cost industry average payments. Workplan Tasks Not 111 Quarter Complete Behlod Started Summary.of Data 5 5 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Section 6- Page 12 Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Division 7101720') Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Manage Capital Projects 80%+ 1D% Due to many projects residing in"less CORF Budget expended by expensive"design phase,expenditures will year's end be higher in later quarters. Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 83% 5/6 projects bid on schedule. established Capital Improvement Program schedule Meet design project 80%+of time 84% Target met. 41/49 milestones either met or milestones officially moved due to increased project scope. Meet Division 710020 JO Less than 29.39%nio Increase in 710 due to unexpected budgets 100% 24.8o%n20 expenditures related to Huntington Beach expended Closure Project. Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The District has responded to 14/14 inquiries correspondence within 30 within 30 days. working days Workplan Tasks Not 1" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 8 3 5 0 Various manuals and written P&P behind schedule. 'Note that Engineering Admin. and Planning &Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6- Page 13 1999-00 First Quarter Report ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Construction Management(Division 730) _ Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data Target Through 3 Months — Target Change Order costs 5% 4.28% Change order costs are always based on a at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four original contract amount quarters. Target has been met. — (industry standard=7.25%) Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 50%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a _ Occupancy in facilities days 50%-240 days running average of the preceding four within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target was not achieved days based on the rolling average utilizing 10 projects. Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 3.80% Target has been met based on QC Inspections and average no inspections. more 10%correctable tleficiencies Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 96% Target has been exceeded. within 20 days greater Meet Division 730 JO Less than 100% 24.27% Target met. budgets expended Workplan Tasks Not 1^Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 7 2 3 2 Various manuals and written P&P behind — schedule. Section 6 - Page 14 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Administration (Division 810) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Ensure Operations $308/million $324/million gallons Exceedence due to non-recurring costs treatment cost per million gallons treated treated and natural gas costs which will be gallons does not exceed averaged throughout year. target .. Ensure O&M division 96.100% 101.1% (annualized) See above comment. budgets managed within appropriated expenditures Ensure Total Injury 16.3 13.89 Target met. Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) more below industry average Ensure three-year staffing 206.25 FTEs by 202.5 FfEs Target met. plan figures are met end of year r Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A r r Section 6- Page 15 1999-00 First Quarter Report y OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Operations & Maintenance Processing Support (Divisions 820/870') Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data Ensure utility, chemical, 90%-100% Total contracts Natural gas expenses increased contracts biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 100.8%for slightly above target. _ contracts are managed 3 month period within budget (annualized). Ensure milestones are 80%+of time -80% Project milestones met. completed on assigned projects Respond to Engineering 90%within -90% Target met. Capital Project Review deadline Requests Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.028 Overhead rates for charges related to kilowatt hour($/kWh) CenGen were lowered due to reallocation thus positively impacting$/KWh. Maintain theroi at .111 thernslkWh .102 therns/kWh- Within targeted parameters. Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 (kilowatt hour)within .106therms1kWh .1o8thenms/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 69% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit Central Generation plants requirements. within targeted limits Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data 7 6 1 0 Portion of final multi-agency benchmark report to complete. 'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6-Page 16 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 830/840) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Summary of Data Months Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 76% Plant 1 Target met. Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 73%Plant 2 Process Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 43%Plant 1 Problems with emulsion (BOD)Removal Targets in Primary 43%>at Plant 2 41%Plant 2 polymers and repairs on Treatment Process Primary Basin J impacted Plant 1 and 2,respectively. Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 21%Plant 1 Within targeted parameters. total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 23%Plant 2 targets 5 hours leave taken) 25%at Plant Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.2%Plant 1 See above. does not exceed targets salary 2.0%Plant 2 Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 4 2 0 2 Delays pending negotiations resolution and finalizing Y2K projects. Section 6 - Page 17 1999-00 First Quarter Report - OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860) .— Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 3 Months Summary of Data Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 43% Commitment to project-related activities. Time in Mechanical particularly Y21K,reduces direct wrench time Maintenance Division percentages. Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 41% Commitment to project-related activities, Time in Electrical& particularly Y21K,reduces direct wrench time Instrumentation Division percentages. Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54% Time/Direct Support Time Target met. in Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54% Target met. Time/Direct Support Time in Electrical& Instrumentation Division Ensure preventive <90% 62% Target met. maintenance backlog in Mechanical Maintenance is _ less than 1 DO% Ensure preventive <90% 57% Target met. maintenance backlog in _ Electrical&Instrumentation is less than 100% Workplan Tasks Not 1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 10 5 5 0 A few projects related to equipment identification slightly behind schedule. Section 6- Page 18 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Air Quality &Special Projects (Division 880) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Through Target 3 Months Summary of Data Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target. deadlines Ensure collections sulfide 80-100% On track Performance objective is on target. control managed within budget Ensure PSA/contractual 80-100% On track Performance objective is on target. services managed within budget Workplan Tasks Not 1�^Quarto ,u -Corgplate ' Behind Stanid Summary,of Data 3 2 1 0 Limited consultant resources has placed one project behind schedule. Section 6- Page 19 1999-00 First Quarter Report INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT (Divisions 910I93019401950•) Performance Objective 199mo Performance Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data - Resolve all help desk calls 75%within 3 70% Some calls have resulted in longer term days commitments thus bring down average. Plant radio, PBX and 98%+ Radio=100% Targets met, Network"Up-time' PBX=100% Network=99.98% Database "Up-time' 95%+ 99.86% Target met. Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met. "Up-time" plants 100%=Plant 2 Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 7 3 2 2 Cancellation of FIS OneWond upgrade and delay in two other projects. `Note that Information Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6-Page 20 Orange County Sanitation District (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 9/30/99