HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11-17 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
November 10, 1999
URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT *** URGENT
PLEASE NOTE — CHANGE IN MEETING TIMEM
phone:
17141982-2411
nailing address:
8127
FoacDin Valley.C4 NOTICE OF MEETING
92720-8127
addreasse
Avenue
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1 oure Ellis Av Due
�unte1nVe-7 1CA
8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
92708J018
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1999 — 6:00 P.M.
hasaesr DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
Algorithms
Of 10844 Ellis Avenue
cities Fountain Valley, California 92708
Arsehom area The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
eras
Buena Park District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Cypress
Faunas. Valley F �j
UII
Gerd G,ave
en
Huntington Beach
Irvine BoAfd Secret
Le Habra
Iy
Le Pelee
Los Alamitos
Newport Beech
Orange
Reactive
eetingss
SolAn Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming M
Seel Beech
Benton
meth" STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 4:00
Wile Park Y� P•m•
Y4r6e Linde
County of orange OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 1, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, December 2, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Sanitary Districts
C"sto Mass FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 8, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
Midway Coy
Water Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, December 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
lrvno Panch @OCWD
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 15, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
-To Protect the Public Heckh and the Environment through Excellence in Metewater systier"
n
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
December "December 15, 1999 -
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
April April 26, 2000
May May 24, 2000
June June 28, 2000
July •July 19, 2000
August August 23, 2000
September September 27, 2000
October October 25, 2000
November 'November 15, 2000
*Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
N:Wq�]nOSA rdal1 Me NNofic WN9.2.d
r
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 17, 1999 — 6:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
11/17/99
Page 2
5. Closed Session
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development
Limited Partnership(Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
It is the intention of the Board of Directors to resume the regular meeting at 7,00at p
soon thereafter as possible. i
6. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
r
11/17/99
Page 3
B. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
October 27, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/99 10/31/99
Totals $5,666,282.86 $4,263,466.42
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent
Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
a. Receive, file and deny claim of Mladen Buntich Construction Company dated
October 11, 1999, in the amount of$1,157,188.00 for alleged damages in
connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3,
Contract No. 3-38-3.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 17, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on October 27, 1999 to be filed.
1 vr7199
Page 4
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
November 4, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES-
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
November 4, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon,
Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500.
d. Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo
Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing
for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,764, for a total amount
not to exceed $684,054.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re November 10, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 10, 1999 to be filed.
(Minutes will be distributed at the November 17, 1999 meeting.)
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1999.
d. Receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the
period ending September 30, 1999.
e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-22, Amending Policies Numbers B30.00,
C10.00, C20.00, C30.00, C150.00, D50.00, D60.00, D90.00 and F80.00 of
Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98.33; Adding Policies Numbers C20.10 and
C170.00 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 98-33; Ratifying any Additional
Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33; and Ratifying that All
Future Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be Made by
Resolution re Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for
Classification, Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, Policies and
Procedures Governing District Employment.
f. 1)Approve plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates
of Participation long term borrowings; and 2) Authorize the General Manager to
execute professional service agreements with PaineWebber, Inc. and Orrick,
Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the COP restructuring plan.
g. Receive and file the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
for the year ended June 30, 1999, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland
and Associates, Certified Public Accountants.
r
11/17/99
Page 5
h. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Establishing Policies and Procedures for
the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project
Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of Authority to
Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos.
OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 9843.
15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re November 9, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 9, 1999 to be filed.
(Minutes will be distributed at the November 17, 1999 meeting.)
16. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson
Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, adding
a public health element to the existing public information program for an additional
amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $275,895, with Orange
County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the
additional amount of$35,500.
17. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing
Ordinance No. OCSD-09:
a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 2, 1999.
b. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-11 is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines
Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the
revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and maintenance
expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined
service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be
adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.)
d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-11, and pass to second reading and
public hearing on December 15, 1999.
18. 1) Approve an Agreement for. a) the purchase of the 1,808.15 acre portion of Tule
Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kings County for an amount not to exceed $3,254,400;
b) a three-year option to purchase the 4026.58 acre portion of Tule Ranch/Magan
Ranch located in Kem County for an amount not to exceed $4.545,600 contingent on
obtaining all necessary permits for an open-air compost facility on Tule Ranch/Magan
11/17/99
Page 6
Ranch, or upon the District's discretion; and c) the retention of Tule Ranch/Magan
Ranch to manage a portion of the District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years for a
fee of$22.40 per wet ton on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per wet ton plus
Kern County regulatory compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an annual
amount not to exceed $2,540,000 for both Kings and Kem Counties Class B biosolids*
land application; and,
2)Approve an Agreement with the Yakima Company that provides for. a) the
reservation of 100,000 wet tons per year of capacity for compost and storage in
consideration of the payment of$1,250,000 upon the Yakima Company obtaining all
necessary permits for an open-air compost facility; b) the ability to use the Yakima
Company's land application sites for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at
$25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern County regulatory compliance fees, by the Yakima
Company on their permitted sites in Kern County during the compost site permitting and
development period for an annual amount not to exceed $775,000; c) the ability to
land apply District's-produced Class A EQ biosolids' for$25.00 per wet ton for an
annual amount not to exceed $625,000; d) the payment of a composting fee to the
Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton plus a prorated share of the annual permit fees
for ten years at an annual amount not to exceed $2,625,000; and e) the acquisition of a
Site Purchase Option to purchase all or a portion of the compost site for a price to be
determined at the time of the transaction.
19. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-24, Adopting a New Employer-Employee Relations
Resolution, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34.
20.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a.regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
11/17/99
Page 7
1. Status Report of General Counsel re proposed litigation: OCSD v.
County of Kem, at al. (Government Code Section 54956.9).
2. Confer with General Counsel re Colich Brothers, Inc. v. OCSD, Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 806799 (Government Code Section
54956.9).
3. Confer with District's Negotiator and give direction re all Employee
Bargaining Units (Government Code Section 54957.6).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
21. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
24. Adjournments
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose
of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle 714 593-7130
HiM pall genda\Bo Agendas\1999 Beard A9er s\102799.dm
The Ormtge County Sanifafion District •e' Budget Overview demands of central and northwest Orange County. The total the way in Orange County an the Sanitation District and
budgetforfsevlyear 1999-2000reflea Capital Improvement Program(CIP)pmpwed ash flow the Orange County Water District(OCWD). Together,we are
our continuing efforts to streaJn/inethe Our two treatment plants,located in fountain Valley and outlay for Total year 1999-2000 is$92A million,an increase evaluating a joint project that could be the largest water
organixadon,reduce operating tests and Huntington Beach,process about 2SO million gallons of of 27.6 percent over the prior year. reclamation project in the nation.
imreareoveralle choarcies. This rk budget wastewater each day generated by approximately 2.2 million
people in moral and northwest Orange County. The fiscal Over the next four to six years,we anticipate annual Called the Groundwater Replenishment System,the project
also reflecss one of the outcomes of our three- year 199900 proposed budget a operate,maintain and construction project expenditures from$75 to$100 million, would uke highly treated wastewater and,through advanced
yeorstrategiep/ammngefforq anexpanded manage our sewage treatment and disposal system is S44.0 In order to staff this temporary higher level of effort, technologies,produce near-distilled-qualitywater. The water
Capitallinprovemem Progrmn(C/P). million,a$1.2 million edutio,from the prior year budget. the Dinrict will utilice up to lS contract engineers during would then be pumped from fountain Valley,the proposed
Approximately 200 Capita/projxtr Will be this period. These engineers will not be employees of the treatment site.to Anaheim,the location of Water District
District,and she cost for the contractual services will spreading basins. The water would be allowed to percolate
eit/eer in Chip/canning,design or construction
be charged directly to the capital projects being into groundwater supplies and.eventually,pumped to homes
p/ratetGafucalyear. TlieseprejectsiesuranJt within the Capital Outlay Revolving fund. Relying on highly and businesses far drinking and other uses.
$927million of a$1.5billion capital mined,highly qualified contact engineen to augment
improvement plan that=11take us through ss.- ssoa permanent staff will enable us to meet our planning,design The District has proposed matching OCWD funding for this
the year 2020 and which dui/!prepare as to al" s°q° pen and(Education goals without increasing the number of full. project and has budgeted$122 million over a sat-year period.
metthe gromingnads a ojourserviarea, s sp%� time employee. By participating in the Groundwater Replenishment System
$ore s>n's ER and divining up to 100 million gallons of treated wastewater
T/Juyearf budget also includes continued s4so \B7.. Water Reclamation a day,wehope to delay the need N modify our existing ocean
iws90 Iso�9-r 1eel�c 1111-oo osu u still system or defer building a second catchall,which could
participationrat the proposed Groundwatero,aem Lou Southern California,indeed the entire State,is taking a more East SISO million or more.
Replmithment System,a water re/nmarron I focused approach to water resource management. Leading
projetwe are explming in conjunction with The cost per million gallons of wastewater treated.an
the Orange County Water District 1f industry-wide performance measurement,is expected to MEOW e e I
roalttreased,the Groundwater Repla/uhmeat remain the same in 1999.00 as the prior Dscal year projection
Sstem would take as much as 100million of$482. As depicted in the graph,the costpermillion gallons e.w���weuua,..
y mated was noticeably lower in 1997.98 than ineicher of the sez..00000 wnv.,
gallons a day ofhig/dy treateadmastemater •caw Birv1vi iizee+.000 cop
No years preceding it or the two years after. this dip is $4ne9o.000
also,through reverse osmosis,mitrofiltration attributable to the IF Hides storms that occurred in that year, o ...m". t"sz�eze:tau" ••••
andultramsyletdwaleremer,produce near- which resulted in a 6%increase in wastewater flows. s9we.47e,eoe ,s79sze.opo
distilled-quality water for drinking and other
householdura. K< Stmtegic Plan 43, How Revenue is Spent
During fiscal year 1999-2000 the District will complete a
We a"scow car year three of our Flue-Year Our revenue iupens an the cost e,providing wastewater collection,treatment and surpwal service,inducting employees'
Staffing Plan,a course ofactionfor major strategiccicmitmints and iscusthat ill edefne ourgaals, salaries and benefit,debt service,our capital Improvements and the cot of self-insurance.
operational commitments the nut and easodated financial
dewlopinga more nremnlined,eJ�tient requiremenuforthe eat can years. Summary otireaemen4 Disposal EAdministrative Expenses
organization. The plan relies on a tmriety 1998-99 vs.1999-00 Budget
aJtoou,indudingibe imp/emtntation of plant Begun in 1996,the Strategic Plan miles manyof the 1996.99 1998.99 1999.00
and office anfomatian,training ma iatrtaringly assumptions the District had previously used to develop our Passed Budget Pml•ca•a Appromed nuaaet
ve/Optit)e mOrkfOrLe,andsioning-g existing planning document. We worked with the 23 cities salulea and Wager 531.173.MO 633.D5,200 $32,123,300
in our service area and with the(enter for Demographic Parrell B.uerea 5,575,100 5R511,300 5.532,s00
admiaturrative and Operationalproredures Research at California State Onireoity,Fullerton to update Ttm S.I,nm.Mum and Union. 636,748.54) $37,493,500 $37,655,M
Chancto CORF xM Revenue Areas (I2.g30.ID0) ( 4411 M, (15.269.500)
population and land use projections,the level of building Nate OWSudades.W D,91R24o 23.oe2y00 l4lases.
There efforts,as will as others,continue fa achwity in our 470-square-mile service area and the AWMnbvuha Eapaua 332.BB0 696,700 803,300
Juan,on the Districts singular goal:to oratorio ynlume of wastewater treated. Tiv"nnrs c",d Meech Nip 1A43.0110 loesim sell
"best in class"status lJl the waslEwatea' Opening E.pese 5,376,BB0 4,834,400 4,903.100
Cmmaual5ervxu 7.036,050 6A9D,1 An 6,73BSOU
treatment industry,an industry that is Increased Capital improvement Pmressmml soma. 1.111 1.707300 IA22.300
becoming and mootorNg 2.2B2.000 2,3m.500 2.43e,becoming increasingly competitive as more and Program 6110
Repair,and Mamwnre 3.199,040 4,169,200 s.5m,300
more notes naffonmi are de bah rivafiaed Umalea 3,714,950 3,693,700 3,578.500
ag being Other 2582,060 2.164,700 2.687.70K)
Among several outcomes,the Strategic Plan identified areas Re cores and Omen (7.669,000) (7.278.300) pAssisl00)
of our collection system and in-plant treatment processes Netlt OPer Expense. 1045$00,000 g43a104,200 WIMIS000
that must be expanded or rehabilitated•to meet the growing
(g: In-sourcing Ocean Monitoring senor wastewater facilities while,at the same time,ensunng
Prograrek operational efficiency within all areas of the organization.
In 1985,the District's aeon monitoring program was out- In accordance with the stalling plan,a reduction of 24.5 full.
sourced primarily on enure perceived program objectinty as time equivalent(FTE)positions is being proposed in 1999-00,
a msult of the stringent requirements of our 301(h)waiver. 3 FEE position,below the original third year urge!of S21.5 RE. r L
This program now costs the District$1.3 million annually. Own the last No fiscal years,a total of 73 FIE positions have all
In March 1999,son determined that estimated savings of been eliminated as suf0ng was reduced from 616 FTE,to
5284,000 could be obtained each year by in-souning(train S43 Uh for 1998.99. Y
program elements and utilizing existing staff.
�. R4 Engineering Efforts r
Further investigation revealed that other agencies that have
possessed a 301(h)waiver,such as the Cityof Los Angeles, During 1996-97.the Districts Anenment and Reinvention '. �' ///t
County Sanitation District of Los Angeles,and the City of Team(BARD war formed with the goal of reducing the nor of
San Diego,all conducted in-house monitoring programs. our operations while increasing our level of el&iency,to exceed /\
However,these agencies have also implemented Quality that of the most efficient wastewater treatment facility in the /V
Assurance/Quality Control Programs(QWC Programs)to industry. Comprised of employees from all naffing levels,DART FY 1999
ensure objectivity in performing mean monitoring in house. has made significant progress toward making the District"best
1111111111111111111
These QA/Q(Programs will be developed at the District as in class." In 1997-98,DART developed a Reinvention Report
pan of the new mean monitoring in-sourcing requirements. that contain,the O&M reinvention plan and the steps to
implement thecontained
within
ting themn of
The timeline for in-souring the Ocean Monitoring Program implementation and adding the onetime savings.the
is two years. SUN began benthic field sampling In April rxommendations(cntained within this are expected
1999 and will begin conducting cowl sampling in July 1999. to generate a net fire-year return of$3.290.600,with annual T
This will bring all orean monimring field sampling in-house savings o1$1,440,000 Innaffn.
since staff already conducts required offshore water
quality surveys. A,a result.(our enhanced training program and the
implementation of workforce flexibility,(cooled with greater
The next phase of in sourcing will be database management work-practice efficiencies identified by DART,the District has
and the writing of the Ocean Monitoring Program Annual been able to reduce staffing levels primarily through attrition.
Report. Database management will be brought in-house
when the Districts Dan Warehousing Project is complete. - Strategic Goals
The writing of the annual repon will be evaluated in the
future nd a determination made as cc hat role staff and During this fiscal year we will continue to focus on five Strategic
contnnon will play in the production of the document Goals that represent our long-term commitment to excellence Executiveand establish a framework to achieve boo-fn-dau status. Summary
ummary
«f Five-Year Staling Plan These goals are as follows:
In the past,we have compared ourselves with other publicly • Consistently Employ Strategic and Tactical Resource
owned and operated wastewater treatment facilities of Planning
similar size,and the results have always been favorable. a Develop and Maintain an Effective and Efficient Workforce
However,the results of a study conducted in early 1996 were as Consistently Apply Appropriate Technology
not at reassuring. We learned that our staffing levels when
compared to privatized systems were higher,and as a result, • Consistently Deliver Excellent Health and Environmental t
we developed a Fin Yea,Staffing Plan, Protection
se Consistently Deliver an Excellent level of Service j
The plan relies primarily on normal attrition to bring us to ,
staffing levels that more closely match the levels of private
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Us,Arrnur,FDumaln Valley,G 92708-7018 ,tee Orange County Sanitation District, California
moon u,at 714462.2411 D,m,.nsdmm 1ewt
ROLL CALL 41 " lvel�
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 1111U 99 { 7 — TIME:
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... dI _
FLORY
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓ _
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................✓ —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.................. ...
�C� —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... ✓ _
DOTSON
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. t✓ —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................
�G —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... ✓
(SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON.................... —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES........................... —
(MARSHALL).................... MALILLER..................... —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ _
LUTZ
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. i✓
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ _G —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... _
(SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ✓ _
(BLAKE).............................WALKER ...........�........... —
Anders
on
`y IN/1G�4
Anderson ✓l
Kye li
✓
LudwinAll
McIntyreles
Miles
Ooten
Peterman ✓
Streed ✓
Tuchman ✓
OTHERS:
Woodruff T /�JQ�AdLr�
Andrus
03/24/99
%Vadon\d"lwp.dta'admin%BSIDIRECTOR\DirMom Roll Call.dm
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and the Agenda for the Special Board Workshop to be held on
�4 /U 199-L, was duly posted for public inspection in the main
lobby of the District's offices on ' 4akt- Ll , 199-Z. y�—
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this (' day of
199-Z.
Penny M. le, Secrete
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HAWP.DTA\ADMIN\SSWORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATIONTAHR COMMITTEEMOC
tORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
November 4, 1999
ahane:
E7141962-2411
.111n0 add.:
P.O. Bcx 8127
Fountain NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
aeraae add...:
10844 alis Avenue BOARD OF DIRECTORS
r ctaln Valley.CA
92708-7018 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
WEDNESDAY, November 10, 1999 — 5:00 P.M.
Water
Agencix DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
• 10844 Ellis Avenue
cities Fountain Valley, California 92708
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Lyprass
wanrein AllayF.gertan A Special Workshop Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Bardan crave Sanitation District will be heat the above location, time and date.
Huncingron Beach
Irvine
La Hebra
La Palma
Los Alamitos ...NNN
Newport Beach B rd Secr/lbry
Orange
Placentia
Banta Ana
Beal Beach
Btanton
Tustin
Ville Park
Yarba Linda
County of Orange
Bonita Districts
Costa Mesa
Midway City
Water Districts
Irvine Ranch
'To Protect Me Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in wastewater Systems'
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
SPECIAL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 10, 1999— 5:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
4. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
5. Presentation by staff regarding Biosolids Management Contracts: Yakima Composting
Facility and Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch
6. Adjournment
PRODUCTION & MANAGEMENT OF BIOSOLIDS IN SO. CALIFORNIA
Projected Shorfall In 6loeollda Management OPOons Due to Loss of Class a site,
Wet Tons per Day(wVd)on Annualized Basis
— Actual — Estimated —Projected
-
199C 1998 3.Q.g.Q i:QQQ 2001. 2004
PRODUCTION la alit
County of Los Angeles(3) 1.376 1.403 1,431 1.459 1,488 1.518 1,548 1,579
City of Los Angeles(2) 1.050 950 900 918 938 955 974 994
City of San Diego(1) 400 450 Soo 510 624 637 649 662
Orange County(2) 500 510 520 531 541 552 563 574
Other Agencies If 5 to 20) $@4 894 LM 1.040 1.071 1.103 1.136 1.170
TOTAL PRODUCTION $j06 A2ea 178Q AMR aeaa AT6a Am it=
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Class A:Captive Composting
Chino Basin Compost 0 100 105 110 115 120 125 130
LA City zoo 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Other Smell Projects 10 SQQ ]QQ ]QQ Ip,Q j0Q 10 10
SUB-TOTAL 110 210 215 220 225 230 235 240
%Total 3% a% 6% a% a% a% e% a%
Class A:Contractor Composting
FSan Joaquin (McCarthy) 200 200 300 400 500 800 1,000 1,000
ey Composting(Yakima) I--Parm)rs 4 Carsl'n->I 100 300 750 850
e Ranch (Magan/Orange Cry) I—Perrnls AComr'n-> JQQ am -40
rn Count • 200 200 300 400 600 1,000 2,050 2,260
Corona (Recyc/Synegr0)' 500 600 3001 400 500 500 500 500
Antelope Valley (BioGro) Q Q ----permlbiasued,Culpsobeblywl3never bebrull--->
SUB-TOTAL 700 800 Soo 800 1,100 1,500 2,550 2.750
%Table 16% 19% 14% 18% 24% 31% am 55%
Class B: Lend Application
Kern County' 2,100 2,000 1,770 1,660 1,63E 1,32E I—Banned —s
Kings County' 400 400 Soo 500 500 am Soo Soo
Riverside County3 350 400 300 300 200 150 75 0
San Diego County+ Q ]QQ JIM iN IN 100 OQ 0
SUB-TOTAL 2.850 2,960 2,720 2.610 2,385 2,075 625 500
%Total A% ae% Im ea% 51% 44% 13% 10%
Other Methods
Hyperion HERS 300 -----permanently decommissioned due to high coals a safety-------
PuenteHillsLandfill (LACSD) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Sycamore Landfill(San Diego) 0 0 500 505 629 636 640 665
Mitsubishi Cement Kiln 25 E9 2@ 25 25 2Q 25 a
SUB-TOTAL 625 325 825 830 954 961 965 990
%Total 18% a% 19% 1tt% 20% 20% 20% 20%
TOTAL MANAGEMENT M I= A3ao &M 6ea8 176E L376 G4B0
SHORTFALL 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 Soo
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1OY. 10%
Kern County does not want quantity of Imported bio ni ids to Increase;thus,awn after Class a ban,Mporn may be limited to about 2,250 west
Best case sunrise for this really in prOblemetic location;issuance II will remain open by convening W Aerated Static Pile composting melho0
,Includes 350 well of LACSD biennials applied on McCarthy Family Farm nil 150 wed of OCSD biosdists applied on Tule Ranch
3 Class B land rppicallm sites In Riverside and northern San Diego CoumN9 are gradually being lost due to housing developments
G:1Bacef.JtoltsUS501bamidR33oCol absolute Balance 11/17me
City of Los Angeles EQ Biosolids Management Proposals
November 8, 1999'
Company Technology Price (Wet Ton)
Waste Markets Landfill alternative daily cover (ADC) of $32.50
onsite alkaline-stabilized biosolids
Transitional Lime stabilization and land application $40.00 (Est.)
Environmental Corp.
Enertech "Slung Carb" liquid carbonized fuel $44.00
Environmental Inc.
California Soil Chemical stabilization/pasteurization and $23.97 -$32.70
Products land application
Terraloa Technologies Deep well injection $25.00
Saltdale Class B land application $26.50
(Slick Gardner) Chemical stabilization and land $32.50
application
San Joaquin Composting and land application $30.06 -$30.56
Composting
S na ro Com ostin and land application $35.00 Est.
Minergy Corp. Glassification and industrial use $40.00 Est.
U.S. Filter Bioset TechnologyN/A
Hondo Chemical stabilization/pasteurization and $27.00
land application
Thermo Energy I Sludge-to-oil Reactor System (STORS) N/A
Environmental Corp.
I Twelve proposals were submitted to the City of Los Angeles on November 8,
1999 in response to their request for proposals for innovative and EQ biosolids
management options. District's staff reviewed public copies of the proposals.
2 Inclusion of price in the public copies of the proposals was not required.
3 Price estimation based on unsolicited proposals received by the District.
H:Nvp.dletl W5ftero1dUk A RFP Revim.dao
Biosolids Management Financial Analysis
Status Quo
Video
Haulingane Mgmnt Reg.Comp Toal Coats (1999
Year Cost(fAvq Coats($Avt) Went) Dollars)
1999-00
2000.01 $25.50 $6.00 $31.50 $30.00
2001A2 $20.14 50.00 $32.14 $29.15
MOM $28.70 $6.00 $32.79 $28.33
2003-M $VA8 0.00 $33.46 $27.53
2004.05 $28.15 ".00 WAS $20.70
200 -06 $23.06 $6.00 SUAS $25.01
2008.07 $28.57 $6.00 $35.57 $25.28
2007-00 $30.31 $8.00 $35.31 $24.60
2008.09 $31.07 $8.00 537.07 $23.80
2009-10 $31.85 $8.00 $37.85 $2323
Averepe Pm ram Cpsl in -Yr 1BB9 E/wl
Yakima Compost Option
Based upon a maximum annual application men of 126.000 et
Ten Year Caudly Price=$1.250.000
pp
ApS cost CapacCast
ry Crean Tag coal Prem(1999 Valuo
Year Cepeclry Prko (Sag CocySlwt) (SAhI Olaer Fao (SNd) rye89 Dollare)
1099.00 $1,250,000 (See Ngatlt)
2NO-01 E27A0 $130 41.06 $0,50 $27.55 $26.23
2001-02 $20.09 $1.30 41.05 $0,60 $28.23 $26.61
2002-03 $20.79 $1.00 $1.65 $0.60 $28.93 $24.99
2003.04 $20.61 $1.30 41.05 110.50 $29.66 $24.39
2004-05 $30.24 $1.30 -$1.85 $0.60 $30.39 $23.81
2005-00 $31.00 $1.30 41.05 $0.50 $31.15 523.24
2006-07 $31.76 $1.30 41.05 $0.50 $31.02 11=41?
2007-08 $32.67 $1.30 41.65 $0.50 $32.72 $22.14
2008.00 $33.39 $1.30 41.0 $0.50 $33.53 $21.61
2009.10 SUM $1.30 -Silos $0.50 $34.36 $21.10
vpre o Propmm st - r E I wl
Title Ranch Land Purchase Option
Based upon a maximum annual application rate of 5D.000 wt(26wVecre)
call,a selected
Land PumhaseMell App.Coel Amordood Taxes SWRCB Fee. Total Coal Prs$ent Vales
Year Pd. (Saar) Land Cost ISM) (Stet) ($A-Q (INS Dollars)
100"a O8ars1,600tAc (sesumatlp (6eatba
200"1 $23.0 $4.69 $0.29 $1 $2898 $27.60
2001.02 $23.50 "All $0.30 $1 $29.56 =11,81
2002.03 $24.18 "All $0.a0 $1 $30.15 MIME
2003-N $24.77 54.69 $0.31 51 $30.77 $25.31
2004-05 $25.30 $4.60 $0.31 $1 $31.39 $24.0
200640 528.02 NAB $0.32 $1 $32.03 $23.90
2008-07 528.87 $4.00 $0.33 61 $32.69 $23.23
2007-oa Mat $4.89 $0.33 $1 $33.36 $22.50
2008.00 528.02 $4.80 50.34 $1 $E4.OS $21.95
2009.10 Sell$1.300/Ac $26.72 $469 $OaS $1 $34.76 $21.34
Weapon
Asars0 mrsm wtn -Yr1989S Iwl
All amarara5on epmsanf value calcutalbns ere Casee upon 5%learned cols
Massif Cost insulation 5925%peremium
Nate A2 Calculated®1%ofac4ad land valua. Inl0el value of E600/AcaxalatlnA®5%perennum
Note Based upon Me MOO(Year 1999)value ofE80WAC One ascala0np8 5%W annum
Biosollds Management Financial Analysis
Biosolids Annual
Reuse Program
Opgon /Disposal Cost 0
Cost($Avt)
wVyear
Land application utill9ing adedng conyacb and meaning cumenily a ddlefttled regulatory
requimmants(StaNa Quo) $26.49 $5,163,000
125,000w to Yakima•50,000 w to Tula Rana S Remaining Shale Quo $24.07 $4,694,139
Because of a fight housing supply and high demand generated by strong job growth, upward pressure on
housing prices will continue at double digit rates in 1999 before dropping back to 7.6 percent appreciation
in 2000. Recent statistics from the Real Estate Research Council suggest that housing prices in Orange
County, unlike other Southern California counties, have finally recovered all the losses incurred during the
first half of the 1990's.
The District implemented a five-year rate schedule in May 1997 that provides for gradual increases for
four of the nine Revenue Areas through 2001-02. The two Revenue Areas in need of the largest
adjustments voted to extend their increases over a ten-year period beginning In 1997-98. a move
designed to ease the immediate impact of those Increases on their residents. Pending completion of the
new strategic plan, it is anticipated that three Revenue Areas will require no change in their sewer service
user fees through 2000-01. Prior to this increase, the District had been operating without an increase In
sewer service fees over the last five years by deferring the construction of new facilities and by
reorganizing and streamlining operations which resulted in the reduction of actual staffing levels by 93
positions, or 14.9 percent of the workforce, primarily through attrition. However, rate increases became
Inevitable as the District's capital improvement and rehabilitation requirements and Certificate of
Participation debt obligations grew beyond the District's ability to pay solely from property tax proceeds.
In 1998, the District conducted an in-depth review of it's reserve policies. This review included a survey of
the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying
economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 1999, the District's
designated retained earnings totaled $376 million, and have been earmarked for the following specific
purposes In accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy:
Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 56 million
Designated For Self-Insurance 54 million
Designated For Capital Improvements 122 million
Designated For Capital Replacement&Rehabilitation 44 million
Designated For Debt Service Requirements 33 million
Designated For Rate Stabilization 67 million
Total Designated Retained Earnings $376 million
MAJOR INITIATIVES
Strategic Plan
The District is currently undergoing a major strategic planning effort that will define goals, operational
commitments and associated financial requirements for the next ten years. The strategic plan revises
many of the assumptions used to develop the District's existing planning document, including the
population and land use projections, the level of building activity within the service area and the volume of
wastewater treated.
The plan, which Is expected to be completed in the Fall of 1999, will also provide an operations and
financial plan, including a review of the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and a study
of the ocean ouffall system.
Reinvention
Based on an Operations and Maintenance(O&M)efficiency assessment conducted in the Spring of 1995,
it was determined that an additional 16 percent reduction in personnel and technology costs would have
to be achieved in order to become "best in class". Shortly following this assessment, a District's
Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed to involve employees in the implementation of
iii
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
1998
Depreciation Net
Property and Operating Net Changeto
Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed
Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (LOU) (Loss) Capital
1 $ 2,008 $ 5,696 $ 3.138 $ (2,732) $ (1,681) $ (320)
2 9,596 18,232 10,330 (7,345) 4,276 3,123
3 10,637 18,553 10,128 (51796) 8.165 1,846
5 2,661 1,980 1,902 (2,400) 1,336 464
6 1,194 3,229 1,250 297 2,440 96
7 3,024 4,362 3,850 (5,333) (1,523) (487)
11 2,167 3,517 2,327 (2,181) 782 1,109
13 - 742 312 (71) 725 653
14 - 2,604 (3,855) (3,289) (1,699)
Total $ 31.287 $ 56,291 $ 35,841 $ (29,416) $ 11.330 $ 4,786
Net Total Assets Due From Due to
Additions (Including Due Other Other Net
Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total
Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity
1 $ 6,622 $ 93,197 $ 840 $ 10,737 $ 225 $ 48,2D8 $ 31.804
2 12,235 385,590 6.768 237 52,104 126.872 251.828
3 17,010 384,084 4,885 2,177 89,669 120,251 264.918
5 3,141 87,827 299 1,144 17.039 21,687 64.072
6 295 60.146 4.740 991 23,264 16,395 42,072
7 11,016 127,931 466 4,928 14,440 26,454 94,403
11 4,373 91,163 340 4,781 6,488 24,306 60,364
13 862 22,516 148 611 2,079 3D0 21.411
14 (8,857) 72,269 8,657 1,537 6,110 1,764 67.451
Total $ 48,697 $ 1,324,723 $ 27.143 $ 27,143 $ 211,416 $ 386,237 $ 888,323
(10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures
Revenue Area No. 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1999 and 1998 of
$17,443,183 and $16,052,791, respectively. This deficit is expected to be eliminated by revised
service charges in future years.
(11)Contingencies
On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pool
(OCIP) collectively filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. At the
(Continued)
24
a
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
time the District had $454,291,774 on deposit in the OCIP. On May 2, 1995, the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California Santa Ana Division
("Bankruptcy Court"), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the OCIP
and OCIP Participants.
On May 15, 1996, the settlement agreement, as amended by the County of Orange Plan of
Adjustment, was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The Settlement provided for the District to
receive "Settlement Secured Claims" against the County. The Settlement Secured Claims are
secured by a first-priority, secured interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered
by the County from third party defendants. The District also received "Repayment Claims'. The
repayment claims are secured by a second-priority, security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries
by the County from third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an "allowed" claim in the
County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement.
Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this
litigation. A litigation fund has been formed by the OCIP participants with approximately$50 million
available to pursue litigation. The District has recorded $88,340,640 as a non-current receivable
on its June 30, 1999 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of
investments in the OCIP. Of this amount, the District estimates future OCIP distributions
approximating$60,000,000 leaving a potential unrecovered balance of$28,340,000, or 62 percent
of the deposit at the time of the bankruptcy.
(Continued)
25
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Miscellaneous Statistics
June 30, 1999
District Organization: 1 Consolidated District servicing 23 cities,unincorporated areas,
and three special districts as follows:
Revenue Area No. 1 Revenue Area No.3 Revenue Area No.7
County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange
Cities: Cities: Cities:
Orange Anaheim Irvine
Santa Ana Brea Orange
Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana
Special Districts: Cypress Tustin
Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts:
District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary
Garden Grove District
Huntington Beach
La Habra
La Patina Revenue Area No. 11
Los Alamitos County of Orange
Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach
Seal Beady
Revenue Area No.2 Stanton Revenue Area No. 13
County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange
Cities: Midway City Sanitary Cities:
Anaheim District Brea
Brea Orange
Fountain Valley Revenue Area No.5 Yoma Linda
Fullerton County of Orange
Garden Grove City of Newport Beach
La Habra Ravenue Area No. 14
Orange County of Orange
Placentia Revenue Area No.6 Cities:
Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine
Villa Park Cities: Orange
Yoma Linda Newport Beach Tustin
Special Districts: Special Districts:
Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Ranch Water
District District
Governing Body: 25 member Board of Directors.
Staff: 518.5 authorized full-time equivalent employees.
Operational Date: July 1, 1954.
Authority: Califomia Health 8 Safety Cade Section 4700 at. seq.
Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal.
Service Area: 471 square miles.
Population Served: 2,386,375
Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtrunk sewers-650 miles
Number of pumping stations-22
Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 89 million of gallons per day
Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 152 million of gallons per day
Total 241 million of gallons per day
Source: Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division.
48
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: November 17. 1999 TIME: 6:00 p.m.
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ i —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ ✓ _
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................
�� ✓ —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.....................
�/ ✓ —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... i ✓ —
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE......................
� ✓ —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE.................
J� —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... ✓ —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... a —
(SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON................... ✓ —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.........................._G ✓ —
(MARSHALL).................... MAUILLER.....................
(DALY)............................. #..............
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. �L ✓ —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... �, a —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. i ✓ —
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ v —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................
✓ ✓ —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓
(SMITH, GREG)............... SHEA........................... ✓ — —
(SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... .7 —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ...C —
— —
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER.......................
STAFF:
Anderson ✓ �M�o
Ghirelli ✓
Kyle ✓ �
Ludwin a oYoy^4
McIntyre ✓ T
Miles ✓ t j „
OatenPeterman
✓ DQG��1��
Streed
Tuchman
OTHERS:
Woodruff ✓ l�ty �u
Andrus
11/17/99
WWonWalal Wry.dla\admin0S\0lRECT0R0ractors Roll Call doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. Z
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) AAIAL ij
w
HOME ADDRESS: Z;77,J l/iEG.�.c✓w+ `„ _
(number/street)
'L/11 7 92Fra�
(city/zip code) z
TELEPHONE: / s'O'7H s✓ /
REPRESENTING: �M sd� �/rz` [/d
(self/name of or nization)
HMvo.dtMadmin\BS\FORMS\Rmuest to Smak.dw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.DATE: — AGENDA ITEM NO. -1 /7
. /, /, , ,' . , , , , , , Show-eff-NEE
5T7 NAME: (please print) �,c �c Q/�/0 (! 141
HOME ADDRESS: ov eE49'Lo S
(number/street)
(city/zip� code)) / /
TELEPHONE: 1 Yl 33 0 Z /-7— Y
REPRESENTING: *LSTYZX f7 Q�/�2�Z- �`!e_
(self/name of organization)
H-. vp.d1a1aftnXBS1F0RMSXRequest to Speak.d
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
e 5 Moec" q± ALS7`yc� %O,o l sL
n)6-
�o�i✓ r�s12oJFL
Pain u Sy„ ao pl'o. &z.
A✓ � /h .c G. qa
� t f. « l/-e- "o
H:\WP.OTAWOMINAWFORMSMGNaN FORM.D
a I A I L UY I:ALIhUKNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on "� / � . 19_&was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ����/CJ , 19.D
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /V day of
Ol�i2`t'i�r✓G�c� , 19�
Penny M. Ky4b, Secret
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
N1 W P.DTA=MIN%8S%FOR MS%F27A
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
r
November 10, 1999
7M.:
(7141962 2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
malllnr eaa,ea.:
Pp. Bo.8127 Subject: Board Letter
Founta,n Valley.CA
9272E 8127
a"at a2Gw: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
10844 Eats Avenue
Fountain valley.cA information on any of the items, please call me.
92708-7018
Laboratory Accreditation
Ma,nbe As part of the laboratory certification process of the California Health Services
Agencies Department, Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP), an audit of
a laboratory operations is performed every other year. On November 3, Mr. Tsing Zia
cities audited the Environmental Sciences Laboratory. Only two minor findings were made,
neither of which affects the quality or accuracy of the laboratory analyses. The
enahaah auditor commented very favorably on the overall lab operation and the competency of
Brea the laboratory cal staff.
Beene van rY analytical N
ypra
Fountain Fm h This completes the second phase of ELAP certification. The third phase is successful
Barden croya analysis of"unknown" performance evaluation samples, which will be received and
Haaungwn Beach analyzed sometime during the first half of 2000. These samples are similar to the
ab a "unknowns" man of us had in our chemist and biology classes in school. The
is Hahne Y chemistry 9Y
Le Pala,. difference is that the lab must pass at the level of 100% accuracy. Lab staff have
Lea Alanot. performed to that level of competence repeatedly over the past eight years of the
NewportGrga'h ELAP program.
placome
San.An. New Chair of the Senate's Committee on Environment and Public Works
seal Beach
Stanwn
r nn Senator Bob Smith (R-NH) has been appointed the new chairman of the Committee
Von Pen on Environment and Public Works to fill the vacant seat left by the late Senator John
r rh.undo Chaffee (R-RI). Members of the committee and environmental groups have noted that
County of orange the recent appointment could potentially have profound effects on environmental
policy considering Senator Smith's desire to reduce federal involvement in
sanitary Districts environmental protection.
caaw Maaa District co-sponsored Forum on Managing Public Controversy
M,dway cry
water Districts On October 20, Peter Sandman addressed public officials and staff at a forum co-
sponsored by the District, Carollo Engineers, Camp Dresser McGee and MWDOC.
Irr,ne Ranch There were about 90 participants, including several Directors. Dr. Sandman has an
article, Risk= Hazard + Outrage, Coping with Controversy about Utility Risks (ropy
attached), which is printed in a special AMSA advertising section of the October 4,
1999 Engineering News-Record. If you would like a copy of the entire section on
Utility Leadership in the New Millennium, please call Michelle Tuchman at
714 593-7120.
-To protect the Puhla,Health and the Ehr rm hh.ht&rough E+celleace n,M.. .wr SY4ems-
r
Members of the Board
Page 2
April 21, 1999
Y2K Bill Signed into Law
Earlier this year, President Bill Clinton signed the Y2K Act into law. This bill was
tracked and analyzed by ECM, and also analyzed by District's Counsel. Our analysis
shows that the bill could have several effects on the District, which are stated below.
• The Act primarily protects manufacturers of equipment excessive punitive
damages. The District already has some protection in state court, where these
cases are usually handled. This indemnification, therefore, will give the District
little new protection, while making claims against manufacturers more difficult for
the District.
• The Act does protect the District's contractors from being named as co-
defendants in a lawsuit against the District, thereby possibly isolating them from
proportionate liability.
• If the District is involved in legal actions, the plaintiff may not know the damages
are Y2K related. Under those circumstances, the District must note this to obtain
protection under the Act.
• Violations of environmental regulations are not covered by the Act. Therefore, the
District is not protected from regulatory or legal actions from Y2K induced
violations of environmental regulations.
Overall, this bill potentially could put the District slightly at risk, while benefiting
manufacturers, and provides the District with little new protection for problems related
to Y2K problems.
Odor Complaints
In the last three weeks, only two odor complaints were received, in spite of all the hot
weather. One was from a neighbor to the west of Plant 1 and after operations made
changes the neighbor called back to say that the situation was much better. The
other complaint was in the collection system and no odors were detected when an
odor circuit was taken.
Eastside Reservoir Inspection Tour
There is space available on the one-day November 22 Eastside Reservoir Inspection
Tour hosted by Director Kenny Witt of MWDOC. If you are interested in attending,
please call Lorraine Roy at MWDOC, 714 963-3058, as soon as possible.
Letters of Appreciation
We received the attached September 30 letter of thanks from the Orange County
Grand Jury, which visited the District on September 29 for a briefing on our programs.
The Grand Jury routinely visits our agency to review our operations.
Members of the Board
Page 3
April 21, 1999
On October 7, Scott Baugh held a forum that centered in large part around the issue
of the impact of stormwatedurban runnoff on beach closures and public health. Bob
Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, and Blake Anderson made a presentation and
provided technical assistance and expert testimony. Attached is an October 29. 1999
letter of appreciation from Assemblyman Baugh.
Published Articles of Interest
I've included copies of articles and other publications from various sources that you
may find interesting. There is a reading notebook of all articles of interest to the
District that is maintained by the Communications Department. It is available for
review at the Board meetings. If you are interested in a certain article, contact
Michelle Tuchman for copies.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Dona d�ntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
H WP DT UDMIMGW MLLETTERS TO THE ROPRPHP111799.000
Attachments
AMSA
UTILITY LEADERSHIP IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM -
Risk = Hazard + Outrage:
Coping with Controversy about Utility Risks
by Peter M. Sandman, Ph.D.
Assume that people are worried about sus outrage distinction is just a special The Progression of Controversy
some risk posed by your operations. case of the distinction between substance Here is the"natural history"of a typical
Tbey're worried about heavy metals in and process. In any controversy (a pro- risk controversy, in four stages. The
sewage sludge (okay,byosofids) ...or a posed rate increase, an odor problem, a controversy begins when some group
possible chlorine explosion ... or emis- contract renegotiation with the union, complains that something is dangerous.
sions from your power plant...or CO or even a dispute with an individual cus You investigate the hazard and deter-
THMs or EMFs. miner),how hot the battle gets depends mine to your satisfaction that it is low.
Every utility—sewemge, water, mere on process than on substance. So you ignore the complainers. But
power, gas—has a full portfolio of such And of course,increasing competi- people do not respond well to being
risks Some are chronic, some acute; tion means these battles matter all the ignored. They get more angry, more
some concern your neighbors, some more, since customer loyalty can be frightened. They also gain more
cus
tomers,stomers;some are genuinely dao- momentmm more members,contnbu-
gerous,sometedmially trivial.A➢repro heavily aged by a highoutrage lions,media covers That propels you
sent potential sources of risk controversy controve into the second stage. P Pe
If you're a public utility leader,the A gve skill In Stage Two,having failed to ignore
buck will ultimately stop on your desk Preventing and managing outrage, in Your critics into oblivion,You try to bury
How you manage risk will, in part, short,will be a key Bldg for utility lead-
mate them m the data You collect all the evF
define your tenure and shape your ulti- Bence you ren thatyou're right and
success. are tw in the new millennium. ThemtihWre cols,and you dmpdion them
are two points here. First c anymiica
Risk E Equals mnageme is seem to than manYutility in the hopewthat it will as ell em on appy q �p managements seem to think this works home. People
a the job
ried divide the "risk" le are The And second,the kind of commune as it would at home. People are not
rigid about into
eo two components. the cation that matters most isrt placing Pleased to be called fools. 'they get
technical side of the risk focuses d the uff pieces in the media aboutajob well more angry and more frightened,more
magnitude and probability of the cm- momentum and more power . . . and
able outcomes: tr increase in the so- done; s anticipating and responding m
cer rate, a catastrophic accident dead worries and grievances, to outrage. now You're in the third stage.
fish in the river,even a decline in prop Rusk communication, not conventional In Stage Three, having failed to
erty values.Call all this"hazard public relations,is the key.
." ignore them into oblivion,having fooled
The nontechnical side of the risk the typical risk controversy comes to bury them in the data,you now look
focuses an everything negative about the when the bazard is low and the outrage for a way to attack their motives. If
situation itself (as opposed to those out is high Captivated by the high outrage, they,professionals you all them met-
comes),Isftvoluntary or coerced,familiar the public insists the problem is sen, cenaries; if they�re amateurs you call
orezotic,dreaded ornotdreaded?Areyou ous;lulled by the low hazard,the utility them ignorant If they're on the right
trustworthy or an insists it isn't
untrustworthy,all°rlhy,responsive The utility is right about the hazard You all them fascists:i they're h the
or unresponsive?Call all this"outrage." ty left You can them radicals. If they're
andwrong abomthe outrage.The public men you all them macho; if they're
Frst Principles is right about the outrage and wrong women you call them hysterical.
Given these definitions, here is the about the hazard.And of course until the People don't like having their
Fust Law(maybe the only law) of Risk utilitydoes something to reduce the out motives attacked. Once again, anger,
Communication: outrage, not hazard rage,it has very little chance ofpersuad. fear,. momentum, and power escalate.
drives reputation.Even significant haz- mg the public that the hazard is low. Welcome to the fourth stage,
ards are usually tolerated when out In Stage Four you get a telephone
rage is low,and even insignificant baz- call from top management"nds is get
ards are usually rejected when outrage ting serious,"you are told."These Pep
is high. ple used to be just a minor irritant But
Of course whenever hazard is high, now regulators are asking awkward
you have to manage it right—for legal and . questions, newspapers are running
regulatory reasons as well as ethical and embarrassing stories, politicians we
technical reasons.But whether hazard is I thought were on our side are putting
high or not,and whether you manage it some distance between us and them.I
right or not if outrage is high you're dout are what you have to do, get
going to be in reputationaltrouble.Spyor these people off our backs!"
have to manage outrage right too. And so You end up spending mit
Most fundamentafty,the hazard-ver- lions of dollars faing the hazard that
you decided at Stage Onewas too trivial
to be worth facing.
Managing Outrage A Primer
The guidelines, for. mitigating—and not to yot The more often and your hand. Now have the grace to 4
prevmfing utrage are .deceptively apologeticalty_yat arlmowledge the -.sayso Amibufiggyourgoodbehav-:
obvious.Flve key ones: sins of ithezp.n4.tfie mole.:4ukl y "for to yom•:.Qv om�natural,goodneas;
1 Stake out the middle; not the -.others decide ifs hmeto move oD loggers skep*Rwo',Attributing it
extreme:)n a 5ght between"tem'bly 8; Acknowledge current ProbleIDs. t f¢ pregsur¢.gnx yncteases the:
dangerous"and per(ecfiysal2, the Ow;sioos, distortrdDs, and- splo` ,LTcekbnod believe _you-
wmner wit be"ternby dsmga'ous. congo)r damage aedibiTi(ynmrJ�as
But modkstly dangaobs"1,aya tbn- �mdclT�oujrlgMGeg.. .odyway `STi °gon(Egr4ai�'ao�iwniable. .
tenderlfyoafieservea$ achnsts 'LobutTdiaedrbfiitypir aac]mu� f,( e)u$ite Qte; iyagerWe w�F .
can get aivaywdh'grving you anF :WobldDs- s.rDu'solu'e? -dt Pe-q)-aletPteeVe tEe iD?
mstcad,.Izutym!wron'theabletoget '�'<6cforejrd4kouwdyWwM iffi(efo 'fjmighands.P.a7i 1oF io pt(RShe�
awaYw'ifitgwing yourseganA tsolyetthet¢+-gp'id ,beygpd. me[e Tponk'okElsdphere,{ppahbtfitlgt$.;
I Acknowledge prior misbehavior � honbly'��^'r•, t'+' 8y, UIEIU
The prerogative of deciding an ,in,.
Kk 'it R itiattr, .:
You can-.Put your wstakes behmd ,'ty Odyoq�r� +� ' .your
you belongs to your stakebokders, :untr1 a.ap4vrets forced Soo0. r`»> c5 . :. -I
.. ... ..[.a7 u. . -.a . , . . n. �...Na. •�,A� vrw J.va _Ca-l. i.yNluNwtt-fy .�.. ...... ...
Would a Simple apology suffice? ficular emphasis on sharing Control.In And once there is consensus on which
And that doesn'twork either.Your prob. fact,I sometimes take the more radical one to do, well implement it as eff-
lem was an outage problem,not a hu- position that utilities should think about ciently as we know how.But the choice
and Problem Your critics needed an abandoning Control altogether. is yours."
apology and a Community Advisory Suppose you're the water company. In no time stakeholders are taking
Panel,not a$40 million piece of equip Your job is to provide the safest,cheap you out for a beer, and ask, ryes, but
ment They re still outraged.The only est, most plentiful water you can. But confidentially,which one do you think is
Change is now you also are outraged, there are tradeoffs here. Safer, for bar You„ay have as much impacton
because you've just wasted$40 million 'Ple, may mesa more expensive the outcome this way as holding onto
on a useless piece of equipment and less plentiful the control...without the outrage.
So here is the bottom line. The Who should decide these difficult But thafs the advanced course.
proper response to a serious hazard is tradeoffs?Why not your customers?It Most of my utility clients ant quite
to mitigate the hazard. The proper is,after all,theirwater,thew money,and imagine themselves abdicating control
response to a serious outrage isn't to their health. (And your profits often altogether, defining themselves as ana-
ignore it (as in Stages One,Two, and have almost nothing to do with how lysts and implementers rather than as
Three),and isn't to mitigate the hazard these competing goals are compro. decision-makers.
(as in Stage Four).The properresponse mired.) If you Can share control met impor-
to a serious outrage is to mitigate the Similarly,should the electric power tan matters and delegate control on
outrage. supplier be the one to decide what to do unimportant matters,you'll have made
The sidebar (see "Managing about EMFs? Should the sewerage progress enough on the fifth of our five
Outrage: A Primed summarizes five authority be the one to decide how guidelines for managing outrage.
basic guidelines for managing outrage. much treatment is enough treatmenE
If you're typical of my clients,you wig If you think an,we it an example from Cost Versus itisk
find these principles simultaneously outside you field changes your mind. There are actually two seesaws in
very obvious and very counter-intuitive. Should the Pentagon be the one to action here.The one I've talked about is
Companies and agencies usually try decide which new weapons systems we power dynamics, where abandoning
to win thew battles with critics.Instead, need to build? control paradoxically increases you
I help my clients look for profitable ways influence.The other seesaw is cost ver-
to settle,sometimes even to lose. The Tables Turn sus risk.
Understanding the principles of Note that when you abandon Control, Utilities usually advocate cost Coo-
outrage management and maldng them you experience an immediate compen- trol, leaving regulators, activists, and
work isn't the challenge. The challenge sating increase in influence.This is one customers to demand more protective
is overcoming the constraints of indi- of many examples of what I sometimes risk management But suppose you
vidual psychology and organizational call 'the seesaw of risk communica- came out in favor of spending more
culture that keep you from even wanti- tion." money to achieve higher health and
ng to make them work Whichever side of the seesaw the environmental standards?
utility rides, its publics are likely to Stakeholders would soon move to
Sharing Decisions,sharing Control choose the empty seat and end up on the other seat on the Seesaw and com
All five Principles are important, but the other side."Ifs not realty up to us,"
when I advise utilities,I tend to fait par- you say. "Well tell you what we think
the eras and cons are of each option.
9
plain that you were being too profligate
with their money. Assume for the
moment that the low-cost outcome is
inevitable. Which way of getting there
is better for your utility? Warning the
tight to protect your customers less,or
losing the fight to protect them more?
A Vital Tool for the New Millemsium
Why add outrage management to your
to-do lisO When people are outraged,it
costs your utility money and the ability
to get things done. I'reventing outrage A risk communication consultant based
now is a lot cheaper than responding to in Newton Centre, MA, Peter M.
it later.And outrage management does- Sandman has uwrked with scores of
n't come naturally major companies and agencies around
Ellie most organizations, utilities the world Saxdmax's training video-
am accustomed to selling when there topes and his book on outrage maxage-
are no problems and fighting when meet an available from the American
there are problems.The key strategies Industrial H)giene Association,Fairfax,
of outrage management ran counter to VA at(703)849BM(phone)or(703)
both of these traditions. Theyre hard 2073561 flax).
enough to do when you've decided to,
impossible when you haven't His expert systems sa/tware program
More and more utilities are decid- entitled 'OUTRAGE Prediction &
ing to implement outrage management Management'it available from EMSeN
strategies. No, that's too strong. start- Corp., Golden, CO at (303) 273 M
ing to decide to.I don't know any utility, (phone) or (303) 2735070 (fax)-
municipal or investor-owned, that has Sandman can be reached dira8y at
integrated outrage management totally (617) 6300385 (phone), (617) 640
into its culture,that implements the sic 0384 (fax),or psandman®webtuxet
strategies without hesitation and with-
out fail.
But I know more and more utilities
that are well-launched, struggling,and
making real progress. And I am confi-
dent that in the early years of the new
millennium,many more utilities will dis-
cover the need to focus on outrage
management
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY
700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST•SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701.714/834-3320
September 30, 1999
Donald F. McIntyre,General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
On behalf of the 1999-2000 Orange County Grand Jury, thank you very much for
hospitality shown to us yesterday.
Please extend our appreciation to the others on your staff that spent time with us.
The information that you,Mr. Ghirelli,Mr. Anderson and Ms. Tuchman,provided was
very informative and useful.
With the people and facilities of OCSD, the majority of our county is in good hands.
Very truly yours,
1999-2000 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY
f�
William J3. Aines,Chair
EnvironmenVTransportation Committee
WBB:cj
BACAAYENIO OFFICE ^A $ +`r� BEACH TOFflCE
STATE CAPITOL Cj s Dl 18WI GE B AC BURS t99
P.O.BO, A9A9 NUMINOTON BEACH,CA 9Pfin]
SACMMENm,CA 94269-09fi) 1 nrNfJy ,YI"� t$�w tirp X(714)MJ19
t9(91 )319-2) �GYf� YA�.NNi lliG Ki1Nl4 FA%Q1Q 9CbB3$
FAx(819)J18-218)
Ir
pFl4/NAC 70 G11124L1
SCOTC R. BAUGH [OPIS-S r 0
ASSEMBLY REPUBLICAN LEADER MOZN -fzx ON°"�OcRa
ANsalSc " glaY.06rY (
17 GbylN
October 29, 1999 A `Kc&vws
Yoco III,A 1`/
Don McIntyre,General Manager rA tIS`-AQ-TT
Orange County Sanitation District 'b�5 C` 1-C-M
P.O. Box 8127 T"
Fountain Valley, California 92728
�jfcA1L•i
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
Thank you once again for the participation of Bob Gh'velli and Blake Anderson in the
forum that I hosted on October 7, 1999. The presentation and technical assistance they
offered went above and beyond what I had anticipated,but circumstances were such that
their expert testimony became an integral part of the educational forum. Both gentleman
showed the utmost professionalism,and the forum would not have been as informative
without their full participation.
But they say that no good deed goes unpunished. The forum,which centered in large
part around the issue of the impact of stormwaterlurban runoff on beach closures and public
health,also addressed the critical question:What do we do next? Some of the suggestions,
Comments and questions turned to the question of diversion. That is,specifically,diverting
dry weather stornwater flows to the OCSD treatment works. The immediate question was:
"Can the treatment system handle dry weather flows?" According to Mr. Ghirelli and Mr.
Blake, diversion was actually used to evaluate the impact that strategy would have on
bacterial counts. However, I had the distinct impression that it was done on a limited basis
and for a limited time. So, in order to gather information with the ultimate intent of crafting
legislation designed to develop solutions to this critical issue, I am formally requesting
answers to the following questions:
1.What impact would result from using the treatment system for dry weather diversions for
stormwater drains in the OCSD service area? Would the treatment works and/or the
collection and distribution system need to be expanded? What additional capital Costs would
be incurred from a dry weather flow diversion strategy? What additional operating costs
would result from such a diversion strategy? What funding strategies could be employed,
including the funding plan to pay for the limited diversion this past summer,and the potential
use of state funds in the future(either new or existing funds,or speculative funds, including
water bond funding)?
2.What similar type of Cost analysis results from evaluating diversion as a"year-round"(wet
and dry weather flow)strategy? Some members in attendance pointed out that California
had been"lucky"that it had not generally Combined its stormwater and sewerage systems
into a single system. They Compared the"West Coast experience"to the"East Coast
problems"with respect to the potential for system overload during wet weather flows. The
sum of the Comments was that a diversion strategy presents its own unique set of"issues" It
will be important for policy-makers to understand those issues and whatever information you
SE,,,,THE COMMUMTLES OF MIMiNo)cNaE CH,CYPRESS,SEAL BEACH,LO.9ALAMrOS LA AIIMA.AOSSMOOA,FOUN)Aw VALLEY
PrIMetl M R.WW PA
Don McIntyre
Page 2
could provide my of0ce on those issues would be greatly appreciated.
I recognize that this request is somewhat extensive. However, I also understand that the
OCSD is in the midst,or has recently concluded,its 20-year master plan update, and I am
hopeful generating this information will not constitute a great burden on the district. Whatever
information can be provided in a 30-day timefreme would be greatly appreciated.
Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Peter Crandall of my staff
at 916-319-2067. Thank you again for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Assembly Repu n Leader
11G
UCt-'Lb-9`! U2: Ob✓ brPTOrI, Ld Y5E3rr L` Mar5Y1
1
Dairy Farmers in California
Find Gold in Urban Sprawl
By JAMES STERNGOLD
CHINO.Calif.— Nearly four des- vel of automation and high yleMa.
odes ago,Gerona DeBoer was one of But as Mrs. Definer recounted her
many dairy farmers forced by re- success recently and time a vmimg
tintless urbanumfion to Ore the past one giant herd after another fa
farmland m ins Angeles County her I.esus. the air redolent of the i
where her Immigrant parents had aromas generated by was of than-
settled,to build a new life elsewhere. sands of Holslema W class W
hough a challenge,the move turned she said with only a touch of n s�ta4
out to be a raised blessing with unex- gin,and even a sense of relief,thmlt
peered results was all about to vamsh,driven over
Mrs Definer and many of the oth- yet again by Southern Cabfomfah
er dairy refugees eventually built urban sprawl present in the form EI
stareoh[Mart milking operations brand new shopping centers and sub,
bens In what was than a sun-baked divisions within sight of the mu*Wasteland.4D Mlles east of the spires hares. i�
of downtown ins Angeles. Inshort InSouthern California sprawl h{s s
order, they helped transform the been such a crosmnt dynw�In tqC
near desert into something few out- area's restless geometry of grow't�4 ;
aide the area had a clue about:are of ¢specialty N the post-war era,That r
the most demelywarkmd andproduc- is not always an esem➢ tomany .
five dairy rest, in the country. those whose lives are uprooted
The huge, computerised dairy In the case of the mire V
ms alb¢ I
far shoehmdld into a relatively dairy farmers,the surge of tow,arrD. .If
small area in the Chian Valley to San divlsmrm is wmaily mjecmg naW
Bernardino County would.mme to vitalaymmo,eofthestate'shrgrsi
play a msjor role In CaWornia's lit. industsma.Many of the farmers bare
Oe-mo va keep ahead of Wlaconsm are selling a mended factll i sad
several years ago w the moneys their valuable tracts of land,and ate
largest.mklk-producNg state.a'--'- using the amply profits to build evaq }
larger and tome mBclant oparetl®s
In more bucolic areas. I
Indeed. the big Increase th
values as demand for new hnoatda6
soar, D financing a trawswn
will result for most people tut
broken dreams or the end of a way
IRe but In a new generation of
efficient daictes.As a result. - r
out seems likely to substantially wld-
es as lead over Wisconsin and tbti
No.3 dairy state.New York. i
' Yeah, everything here is outdab
.ad," Mn DCBoer Sand, w *A'- .
ConWutedmt Page Ale
a
UGL-2L-ww UZ:"I
t
The spread of subdivisions in Chino. Calif., is forcing marry farmers to leave, but it is also injecting new
resources into the dairy industry. Farmers are selling valuable tracts to finance larger operations elsewhere.
Dairy Farmers Benefit From Sprawl
Continued From Page AI
stmlled through a sort,that held the
sweet-sour smell of fresh milk and
equipment that was up-16the minute
W years ago. "In this business, you
have to go forward or you're going
backward. You have to keep grow-
ing.You have to strive to get hater."
Mrs.G Hcxrr is planning to sell her
200 acres, estimated to he worth
about llINIO 0 an acre,and move her
2.000 cows to an efficient new farm J
she owns son with a about 180 miles
norlh of Tulare County,which is now
the slate's ,000 c es ingthe doirywn it,up ,�r � '
Cher The id, acres they own up .3
an
saiq cost only ahwt f2500 ifs
an acre. '.>F2f:
"What made all this possible in the ! , l
Chino Valley was the money the
formers got frnnt selling their land in
I.es Angels.-said Rider Feenstra, _
the son of a La' Angeles dotrymnn '
and the executive director al the < "
Milk Producers Cuuncd.the industry
trade group here. "The process of
urhanizatinn in Los Angeles pushes)
the land prices up sat much that n
arcelermN the growth W the mdus-
try out hire. rh•farmers fame-wnh Gennir•and Fred DcHorrydan to sill dusr!110-.t.rc farm in China.Calif.
the vapoal (it hold IN, ""IN .41. .mil eau... L.pxt rvrw.Lv....d it.,Los Anerle-s spr.twl lo'Cularr C.nnny.
t • r:o now.•
Oct-25-99 02:08P Siemon, Larsen & Marsh
949—/51—btlUq
Mc Feeasrro punted to a new ad-
ditior, to hie gfRM wall, a map of the local economy,including,among "On a lot of those farms in thej Cow freckled with red dots other things,w OR well,a tuna and a Midwest and back East• every cow
representing dairy farms, and add- cow. Her name was rotation.. has a name;' Mr. Koopman said.
ad,"They're doing the same thing all In oddillon to its density, another "They're Sort of been. It's not like
Over agoltt" quirk of the dairy Industry here aw that here.A cow's a piece of machin•
The nearby city of Ontario is abou(, that It was operated almost mti ely ery. If it's brake.we try to fill IS and
to con, the enneze[loo a/muW=y immigrants. The largest group if we can't. It gets replaced
of this area in the China Valley neat "-were Dutch, many of whom came "Today,every cow has a number
month and press ahead with the oon- before and Just after World War 11 and a page on the computer"
mmctmn of subdivisions named,in a Sad quickly adapted their northern Mrs. DeSwr said she had never
Itouch of fanciful marketing, for the European techniques to the hot,dry milked a cow by hand, and never
properties they are replacing, like climate.There were also many Par- expected to.In the factory that IS her
Cloverdale Farms and Archibald tuguese,minty tram the Acores,and hem,the employees,almost entirely
Rmch. The farmers are leaking to a handful of French Basque farmers. Lathes,manage me incessantly hurt.
the tulare, and even many of those These days, many farmers, like ming machinery.
Who"Y they intend W stay are gen- Mrs.DeBaer and her husband Fred, "It's lust a factory is what it I%"
orally unsentimmte[. still speak Dutch and visit relatives she said."If the cows don't produce
"People here wee It as past,of the In their homeland perloRcally.They milk,they go to heel."
business process,"said Fred Aglow. also have built extremely ttghaknit Dare result is;a conspicuous How of
a former Mayor of Chino who moved communities, with their own wealth to the north. Modem milking
here (rare a dairy in Los Angelo churches and Christim schools. To Plants cost about $5 million to build
County four decades ago and is now a this day. the industry in Southern in Tulare,but the farmers,and their
San Bernardino County supervisor. California Is dominated by the bankers, think nothing of construct-
-Where you have half a million mi. Dutch, and the dairy industry in Ing them.
mats now there will be 100,000 or so "These ere same of the most prof-
people in a few years. We ell under- itable times ever." said Larry Zive.
trod progreas." tonight,manager of agricultural lend-
It pman,who Sold his farm Farmers find that ing at the Citlrens Business Bacot,
hem tan year and We
spends a the biggest local farm lender here.
week a month m a big dairy he SUbdIV1S1ORS Can "Feed class are low,milk prim are
partly owns Ia New Mexico,named. high.There's a lot of money going to
It'll be a little sad to see everyone bring new vitality. these Inmates Sow."
go," Mr. Kmpman said, "but it Forms here, Mr. Zivelongid said,
makes sense Imo a bushes and usually generate$M.000 to x3OSION
environmental perspective." a month in milk sales, and low de,
There in even a sense among some northern Cemomia, toward the top fault rates have been mkdmal.
farmers Nat,good as Chino has been of the Central Valley is daminated "The risk of leading In this bos4
to them economically,the growth of by Portuguese families.As the Dutch nests ban been nominal almost zero;'
the deity Warrens was too =can. lmmigranes in China have roved to he said. "I don't know taw many
traced without enough planning.The TWare• among the first things they business you can say Net about"
torrent ratio of slam 2;cows to an hem done Is construct a new net- But now the bame are being re-
acre here is among the highest m the work of churches and sehcols. placed with handsomely dcdgned m-
i world That has created envHmmen- The last time the industry was try gates topped with sales Winners
tat coacems that in leant Some of the forced to move, it also pulled up and signs offemig battles at$200,000
farmers wW be glad to k ave behind stakes M a hurry. Joel Splmsky, a antl up. Within a mile or so of Mrs.
for mare spacious farms that. for Dndessar of geography at California Definer's (arm are new shopping
now at least, are tulles from the State University at Long Beach and centers with everything Isom a giant
nearest strbdlvlsbn. the author of a history of the dairy Ratphs supermarket in dry cleaning
"None of these farms ever should business here, said Nat as recently shops and a floras club. t
have been here realty," said Mm as 1962 the Sown of Dairy Valley,ant A huge bummed in front at a Sap
Definer,as she pointed to the berms of the centers of the industry in sus acre spread indictment bWmrdif4mla
thrown up amend many of the fields Angeles County.had 3.505 people and Smooth. proclalms: "The Comm
m an effort to contain the dangerous 85.000 cows. Valley.Worth the Wait"The former y
wash of manure and water spread by 1t was not king after that that dairy is being turned into a plowed
winter Roods. "No one Over thought rising taxes, changing policies re- community.
about the future. It was way tot garding the use of land and environ. Such grandiose projects have ec-
dense.What happened here will nev- mental concerns aver growing ma- celerated the cowry's pressure m
er happen again, anywhere in the more,piles forced the farmers to build the remaining farmers to clam up
world The county cloud their eyes their larger and more efficient oper. the envinn ment. Most of the(arms
to what wall happening In the val- alims in the Chino Valley.Today,the are surrounded by berms meom W
ley." town of Dairy Valley is caged Cent. contain the Spread of water cmtaml-
Before the development of modem tes. It has a population of 0,240 news with manure wall It good.in
refrigeration, processing and flitra. people,and no cows. the winter. The county Is Soso de,
ties methods,dairy farms needed on Initially.Regrowth of the industry manding that the dairies ship mi the .t
We closer to Nair markets,Said So m in the Chino Valley was encouraged 90a,0m tone of manure they pmduce ;,;e
Me early part of the century a big with few restrictions or erwiresmm. every year, as well as the 2 mWlm
an: in south6latom Los Angeles tall concerns. Them am now about tons of manure eminently seockplled County became home to a cluster of 880laws Sol average on each farm m "Far 25 years I restated it," eel
(arms feeding the appetites of a rap. Chino.with many having 0,000 or so, Mr.Feemlra,of the Milk Producers
idly growing metropolis compared with a national average of Council. "We finally realized we
De[rying became So important to fewer Nan 50 cows per farm. needed to take seen. responsibility
the ]we[ ecanamy that when a last The farms are operated with ma- Wlthm maybe five years,thin will b
Angeles entirety see[ was crewed In chine-like imensien and a pure bull. largely gone."
the 19"'..the business ones honored more philosophy.Asked if their cows He added: "It's a way of We for
an the emblem. On Re seal were had mines,me farmers here chuck- Neu people it's a gem.But It's not
figures representing the pillars of led - the land,It's Me business they Iola'
".I.SCAPMONTHLY UPDATE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT PLAN-
Novem er. 1999
Upcoming Meetings A Message from the Executive Director...
y I'm outraged.
5 Annual Holiday Luncheon,
Tuesday, December 7, 12:00— Last month I wrote about risk communication and Dr. Peter
2:00 p.m. —Once again, the charming Sandman and the seminar that was being held to discuss the
El Adobe de Capistrano restaurant in dynamics of outrage—that singular emotion that propels the
San Juan Capistrano will be the setting average citizen from apathetic bystander to enraged activist. The
for the annual Holiday Luncheon, workshop was challenging, fascinating, informative—and counter-
featuring the San Clemente High School intuitive. For Dr. Sandman challenged some of the very core
Madrigal singers as well as a recap of beliefs and actions of my beloved industry. I left the seminar
the events of the past year from our almost a believer, but still hesitant to fully embrace his ideas. For
committee chairs. Please contact Kris at in my rational brain, I still believed that if you just laid out the fads
the SCAP office (949.489.7676) to make of an issue, reasonableness would prevail.
reservations. Today, I stand among the true believers, because a funny thing
Board of Directors: The Board will happened on Monday. I felt the upwelling of outrage, and I
meet at the AWMA/SERRA offices in San became the enraged activist. At the excellent CASA-sponsored
SB 709 Mandatory Penalties Workshop, I listened to some of the
Juan Capistrano at 9:30 a.m. prior to best and brightest in my industry tell me that 1)certain violations
the Holiday Luncheon on December 7. of an NPDES permit will trigger an automatic $3,000 penalty; 2)
Cease & Desist Orders and compliance time schedules don't
Air Committee: The Air Committee protect you from penalties and 3)this poorly crafted piece of uh,
will meet on Tuesday, November 16, legislation, was attached as a trailer to the state's budget bill—no
from 1:00.3:00 p.m. at LACSD in committee hearings and no opportunity for commenttchange from
Whittler. folks like us.
Biosolids Committee: The Now, I can hear you thinking to yourself, "Ray, Raaay, you're
Biosolids Committee will meet Tuesday, overreacting— pull yourself together guy!" Ah, but you see, that is
November 16, from 10:00— 12:00 at the pernicious nature of outrage. When outrage is high, perceived
LACSD in Whittier. risk is high also. As I pondered the possibility of a cash-strapped
agency racking up hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for
Water Committee: The Water say, chlorine residual violations, the more outraged I became.
Committee will meet on Tuesday,
November 30, from 10:00-12:00 at Suddenly, in a moment of remarkable clarity(luckily, the
OCSD in Fountain Valley. rational part of my brain works overtime), I realized Dr. Sandman
was right. If you feel powerless and oppressed, you are outraged.
I felt a momentary kinship with the environmental and community activists, many of whom I have at times
referred to as "wackos , and I understood. If you manage the outrage, you will reduce the perception of the
hazard.
If this bill hadn't been crammed down our throats without any opportunity to comment and hadn't been so
poorly written that much is left to the interpretation of the regulators, would there have been outrage? I don't
think so. In fact, and many of you may be outraged at me for saying this, but we brought some of this on
ourselves. Every time we failed to take responsibility for our problems, or ignored or pooh-poohed the activists,
we triggered outrage. And those outraged activists have their revenge—it's called SB 709.
30290 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE 113 . SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 . PHONE (949)489 7676 . TAX (949)489-0150
Monthly Update 2 November, 1999 ,
So, where do we go from here? Are we really powerless? Of course not. A potentially untenable burden is
about to be placed on communities that can least afford it. Important issues of due process are being wiped
away, leaving Regional Boards with little discretionary ability. Our organization and others will alert reasonable
legislators who will look at these issues and want to address them. But as CASA's Bobbi Larson warned, "It's a
give and take process, and if you open it up for amendment, something else may be given away."
Unfortunately for this situation, Dr. Sandman's workshop was about preventing and reducing outrage. He also
gives one on how to provoke outrage and use it effectively. Perhaps we should have him back to give us that
one 0.
Outrageously yours,
Ray Miller
Board Of Directors Meet
Litigation Funding Update—At their October 21 meeting, the Board was advised that the $37,500 that SCAP
had advanced to CASA for legal fees associated with the Sacramento 303(d)frMDL lawsuit would be refunded
back to SCAP. CASA has decided to bill all member agencies individually to avoid the potential for double
payments if agencies belong to both CASA and SCAP.
In other news, Sacramento has proposed a settlement, but there are doubts that it will be accepted by the
SWRCB and two Regional Boards that are involved. In the NRDC Notice of Intent (NOI) litigation, no significant
involvement has been offered to POTWs (or other agencies) in the development of the Guidance Manual for
developing TMDLs. Since this involvement was a key element in the decision by POTWs to forgo a lawsuit,
reevaluation of that position is proceeding.
NPDES Permit Database —Water Committee Chair Bob Ghirelli briefed the Board on a proposal to create a
database of NPDES permit information containing all 53 member agencies' requirements. Larry Walker
Associates created a similar database of information for the Bay Area Dischargers Association in northern
California. Information regarding numeric and narrative limitations, permit issuance and renewal dates,
applicable Regional Board, etc., would be entered into a Microsoft Access database. Database information
would be available to all members, as would database search information. The initial estimated cost for this effort
is $79,456. While the Board generally endorsed the concept, they asked that the effort and cost be further
refined and brought back to them.
Salinity Coalition —Chair Ghirelli also briefed the Board on issues surrounding the Salinity Coalition and the
potential effects that local desalters and brine disposal to sewer systems and outfalls could have. Bob is
authoring an issue paper discussing these impacts; the paper will be circulated for comment by the end of the
year. The paper will be presented at the next Coalition meeting in January.
Biosoltds/Air Issues —The Board was briefed on the most recent developments on these issues; they are
discussed in greater detail further in this Update.
Water
SB709 Mandatory Penalties Workshop
Over 100 cities and special districts attended a CASA/League of Cities sponsored workshop that detailed
"What you should know about Mandatory Penalties under SB 709." This recently enacted legislation, which in
Monthly Update 3 November, 1999
previous years was vetoed by Governor Wilson, was sponsored by CaIPIRG and promoted to legislators as a
way to reign in 'polluters that are running wild and Regional Boards that aren't minding the store." Because it
was attached as a trailer to the state budget bill, tt did not go through the normal committee hearings, and
POTWs were provided minimal opportunities to comment or negotiate changes.
The law takes effect January 1, 2000 and applies to all
NPDES permit holders; it doesn't currently apply to direct On the Lighter Side
discharging industries. The bill discusses pollution prevention
issues, but the core provision is that once a violation is In a variation of the"Man bites Dog"
established, the Regional Board MUST assess penalties-they story,the Encina Wastewater Authority
have no enforcement discretion. in Carlsbad was recently featured in a
San Diego Union that had a twist on the
According to Bobbi Larson, a mandatory minimum penalty of usual odor story.
$3,000 applies to two types of violations: 'serious' and It seems that two years ago a
'repeat" The criteria for each of these is complex, and because vegetable roasting factory moved next
of the poor way the bill was constructed, many issues are left door to the sewage plant-and
undefined, unexplained and unclear. Briefly, serious violations subsequently racked up at least a dozen
include: 1) exceeding permit limits by 20% for Group II AQMD violations. The culprit: garlic.
pollutants such as cyanide, residual chlorine and certain metals; Encina General Manager, Mike Hogan
2) exceeding permit limits by 40% for Group 1 pollutants such is not complaining: "Obviously we've
as BOD, solids, nutrients, minerals, detergents (MBAS) and noticed the garlic smell at our plant site.
oils. It can be rather strong,although it
doesn't bother us."
The $3,000 penalty will be applied for each violation if: 1) it A Cut Above roasts everything from
is the first serious violation in any six month period 2) if two or zucchini to bell peppers at their plant
more violations occur within any six month period (could be a and thought their move next to the
continuous six-month period or a defined one); or 3) if a sewage plant was the ideal location.
discharger fails to perform certain tasks four or more times in However, Encina has spent millions over
any six-month period (file a report, exceeds a limit, files an the last 10 years to contain and scrub
incomplete report or exceeds toxicity limits under certain permit malodorous smells-they haven't
conditions). received a complaint in over a year.
Perhaps the most disturbing provision of the law is that these The factory is working to contain
penalties will a you have a Cease and Desist Order odors,but apparently,not everyone is
P PPY even if Y bothered by the smell,and they attribute
that provides interim limits or a time schedule for compliance, or the aroma to the sewage plant,
if you have negotiated a permit that contains limitations that
both you and the Regional Board knew were unachievable, but "We've had people say'I don't know
had received verbal confirmation from Board staff that they what you're doing down there but keep
would not pursue such violations. Because of this provision, it doing it." Hogan said.
is almost certain that several agencies will immediately be [Editor's note: Clearly there is
facing fines on January 1. Depending upon the interpretation needed research to be done in this area.
the State Board gives to determining the six-month period and perhaps W ERF could fund the study:
how continuous monitoring violations are defined, some 'The efficacy of garlic fragrance when
agencies are projecting first year violations in the some
to used to mask sewage odors."]
hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Margie Nellor of LACSD recommended, among other things, that POTWs refamiliarize themselves with their
NPDES permit requirements, and make sure that laboratory, field, engineering, operations and monitoring staff
are informed about the penalties and all staff persons and contracted businesses are very familiar with sampling
procedures and analytical methodologies. Larry Walker of LWA recommended strategies for beginning early
permit renewal negotiations.
Monthly Update 4 November, 1999 I
If you were unable to attend the workshop and would like a copy of the handouts, please contact Kris in the
office.
Risk Communication Workshop
"There's an old joke at the Sanitation District that goes something like this: 'Why is it that Anaheim got
Disneyland and Huntington Beach got the sewage treatment plant9 Well, it's because Huntington Beach got first
choice." [Blake Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District, opening remarks)
Unfortunately, as Mr. Anderson went on to say, people love clean water and hate sewage treatment plants.
Worse, in controversial situations, the logical information and arguments POTWs present seem to actually
worsen the situation. According to risk communication professor, consultant and writer, Dr. Peter Sandman,
people are normally apathetic about risk—until they are triggered by outrage to do something about the real or
imagined hazard. When outrage is high, perceived risk is also high.
In other words, people can believe something is dangerous simply because they are upset about it. Studies
have shown that there is a very low correlation between the risks that frequently kill people (disease, car
accidents) versus the ones the public is concerned about (contaminated water, airplane accidents). Outrage is
as much a part of the risk management job as hazard.
Adding to this, Sandman says, is the fact that there are four publics: 1) fanatics (usually 20 or fewer people);
2) attentives (may number in the 100s depending on the issue); 3) browsers (read newspapers and may monitor
your issue) and' 4) inattentives (the bulk of the population). Of the four, the most important public is the fanatics:
your issue is their main interest in life besides their job and family. The other three publics rely on the fanatics to
monitor your issue. If fanatics are moved to outrage, nothing you do will placate them, says Sandman, and they
will try to move the other three publics to outrage also.
How do you proactively avoid outrage? Among other things, he suggests that you have a public involvement
program that seeks out your fanatics, attentives and browsers and involves them in the important issues facing
your agency early on. Acknowledge your problems, don't keep secrets, treat them with courtesy, show
compassion for their concerns, don't bury them in data and make your interactions with them personal. Sandman
cautions that public involvement is most effective when there is no outrage; if outrage exists, there will be no
interest in public involvement because you will not be perceived as trustworthy.
How do you respond to outrage in the midst of a crisis? The following paragraphs on how Dr. Sandman's
principals were recently applied to the Huntington Beach spill situation is an effective example of this.
Avoidina Outrage in Huntington Beach
When the news about the closure of miles of some of Huntington Beach's prime beaches hit the newspapers
due to high bacterial counts, media coverage initially focused on the Orange County Sanitation District's efforts
(or lack thereof)to discover the source of the contamination, and an OCSD employee's speculation that the
cause was due to sewage. However, within days, media coverage—as well as activist statements—reflected a
very different story: that the District was doing everything it could to find the source of the problem and that
frustratingly, they were baffled as to what could be the cause. By the time the beaches were reopened, not only
were the Districts being hailed for their efforts, but the "fanatics" were defending the POTW and pointing fingers
at other parties.
During a discussion of what they learned and what worked in diffusing outrage in this crisis, OCSD's Blake
Anderson noted that as important as the technical efforts were to finding out what was wrong, it was the creation
i
]
Monthly Update 5 November, 1999
of the afternoon staff/media meetings, as well as the immediate availability of the District's communications
director, that made the difference.
"We had to have a mechanism to communicate to our people what was going on each day and we decided
that we would have to open it up to the activists/critics as well as the media,"Anderson said. "It was very difficult
to do because this was not only the first information that many of our senior staff would hear each day on our
efforts, but there was no chance to filter or make palatable the information that would be disseminated. They saw
the worst: we were often uncertain, mystified, frustrated and confused—and they saw it all. But they also saw
the amount of money we were spending, the hours and hours of staff time that everyone was putting in, and they
were able to offer their ideas and opinions freely."
Another advantage presented by the daily meetings: the media had everyone they needed to talk with in the
room at the same time. Also attending the meetings: the City Administrator and Chief of Police from Huntington
Beach; representatives from the State Parks and Recreation Department who had responsibility for many of the
miles of closed beaches; county health officials; Regional Board staff and representatives from the local
Congressman and Assemblyman's offices. The Surfrider representatives were joined by reps from Huntington
Beach homeowner associations, as well as reporters from the Orange County Register and Los Angeles Times.
If the media wanted a quote or an interview, they only had to walk across the room to get it.
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications for OCSD added: "I never wrote one press release—but I was
at the closed beach every morning by 7:00 a.m. to be available to brief the press on overnight events and to
organize the afternoon meetings. The media had my pager, office and cell phone numbers as well as my home
phone number—and was literally available 24 hours a day. Every conversation started with 'Are you on a
deadline? If I needed to find out additional information, I got back to them within 10-15 minutes. A relationship
built on trust was slowly developed—a relationship that will endure."
When asked what they would do differently, Blake said, 'We jumped to some conclusions early on [high
bacteria levels were due to human waste], that took us a lot of time and money to dispel. However, because we
did do such a thorough job of looking for every possible lead, by the time our attention turned to urban runoff as
the source of the pollution, the group was convinced that it couldn't be us."
OCSD is convinced that their openness made the difference in avoiding outrage and building relationships that
will assist them in future controversies. "It's difficult to measure the success of our approach," Blake noted. "But
it would be easy to see if it had failed."
Biosolids
Kern County
On October 12, the Kern County Board of Supervisors approved a biosolids ordinance that will phase out the
application of Class B biosolids within three years, and impose a $3.37/ton trucking impact fee on biosolids load
originating outside of the county.
LACSD, OCSD and the City of Los Angeles are reviewing the way CEOA issues were addressed for the
ordinance and evaluating their legal options. CASA may also become involved as the issue has statewide
implications.
Monthly Update 6 November, 1999,
In related news, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors will be reviewing an ordinance that would
completely ban biosolids use. The impetus for the proposal came from one of the agricultural groups involved in
the Kem County ordinance.
The Biosolids Committee will be setting up a meeting to review the implications of these actions and develop
short and long-term strategies continuing biosolids disposal options.
Synagro Update
Odor complaints are continuing to be lodged against Synagro [the successor to Recyc, Inc.) in Corona.
The County is continuing their efforts to limit the facility to 250 tpd, however Synagro has advised that they are
.not honoring the order.' Civil action is proceeding as some POTWs have received a subpoena for their records
from Riverside County.
Air
EPA Draft 1996 National Toxics Inventory
EPA has released a draft National Toxics (Emissions) Inventory for 1996. The inventory contains emission
estimates of 188 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from various sources including POTWs. The inventory
will be used by EPA in developing regulations and implementing programs mandated by the Clean Air Act.
POTWs submitted comments on the listing asking that AB2588 emissions data be used instead of the very
conservative emissions estimates used by the EPA. In addition, California POTW emissions were double
counted as both major and area sources in the inventory—even though none of the POTWs are above the Title
III toxic major source thresholds.
POTW MACT Standard
In 1998, EPA released the proposed Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standard for POTW
emissions for comment. While no control equipment was proposed for existing plants, for new or reconstructed
plants, covers on primary treatment units would be required and all covered facilities would have to be vented to
a control device. To determine MACT, however, the EPA's Water 8 model was the default model used to
determine major sources; this model overestimates emissions from POTWs. In a positive turn of events, EPA
has recently indicated to AMSA that they plan to remove this language and leave the methodology for major
sources up to the local permitting authority.
Non Sequitur
"Fall seven times, stand up eight."
-Japanese Proverb
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 27, 1999
�JN ANITgT�Oy
c 9
O y
Fcl/NQ TH �NV� OV•
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
Page 2
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on October 27, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
A John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
A Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
A Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; John Linder,
Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterrnan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Layne Baroldi; Jim
Herberg; Chuck Wnsor, Angie Anderson; Mike Moore; George Robertson; Sam Mowbry; Jim
Colston; Jeff Armstrong; Charlie McGee; Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Tom Nixon; Mary Lee; Don Hughes;
Kris Lindstrom; Leslie Moulton; Tom Dawes; Bill Knopf; Kelly Bum-Lucht; Dave Garofalo; Garry
Brown; Jon Ely; Terry Lane; Fred Cardenas; Dave Schlesinger, Augie Caires; Dan McMillan;
Jay Goldby; Jim Howell; Paul Cooley; Ed Winamer, Doug Isbell; John Lippitt
Minutes for Board Meeting j
10/27/99
Page 3
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the
following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Acencv Active Director Alternate Director
Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson' Mark Schwing
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Debay introduced special guests from San Diego who spent the day at the Sanitation
District, met with senior staff and some Directors, and attended the Steering Committee meeting
that evening to learn about the District's governance system, financial systems and operations.
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, was recognized who updated the Directors on the
beach closure incident in Huntington Beach. A final report was being prepared and would be
ready for the November lr board meeting.
OCSD and OCWD were co-hosting a reception on October 28"for former US Senator Paul
Simon and all Directors were encouraged to attend. Senator Simon was to speak regarding the
importance of responsible water-resource management and of the proposed groundwater
replenishment system.
Chair Debay then reported that 1,500 ultra-low-flush toilets were distributed on October 23n°
during the toilet giveaway program co-sponsored by the District. The toilets were given free of
charge to residents in the District's service area. The program is underwritten by the District,
OCWD, Municipal Water District and Metropolitan Water District.
It was also announced that the Planning, Design and Construction Committee would be meeting
on November 0 at the Edison Field in Anaheim due to a League of California Cities meeting
that was to be held the same evening.
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of
Commendation expressing appreciation to former Director of General Services Administration
Ed Hodges for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the
District.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager recognized the guests from San Diego and offered assistance if needed.
Mr. McIntyre then announced that Chair Jan Debay was also now president of the Orange
County Division of the League of California Cities.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
September 22, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
Page 4
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A"
and 'B', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/99 09/30/99
Totals $7.114,774.38 $4,260,360.77
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the October 27, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on September 22, 1999 to be filed.
12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the October 6, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 6, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve recommendation to
donate surplus lab equipment and supplies to the University of California, Irvine
for use by Dr. Betty Olson, with an estimated value of$5,500.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Authorize staff to negotiate an
agreement with The Yakima Company for the management of the District's
biosolids; and 2) authorize staff to negotiate with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for
the purchase of a site for long-tens management of the District's biosolids.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN,AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A
verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee, re the October 7, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on October 7, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the
Reimbursement Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District for
construction costs associated with the relocation of the sewer line for East
Garden Grove Wmtersburg Channel Improvement, Contract No. 11-17-2, for an
additional amount of$200.481.22, increasing the total amount not to exceed
$325,481.22.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
Page 5
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to
Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 8-12, with Mike Pdich&Sons, authorizing an
addition of$96,969, increasing the total contract amount to$2,489,765; 2) Ratify
Change Order No. 3 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12,with Mike
Pdich &Sons, authorizing a deduction of$99,750, decreasing the total contract
amount to$2,390,015; and 3)Accept Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12,
as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving
the Final Closeout Agreement.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve a budget amendment
of$1,107,320 for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract
No. 11-17-3, for a total project budget of$5,027,720; 2)Approve a budget
amendment of$256,852 for Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for a
total project budget of$4,329,752; 3)Approve plans and specifications for
Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil
Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20; 4)Approve Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the
plans and specifications; 5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;
and 6)Award contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for Goldenwest Street Trunk
Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor,
Contract No. 11-20, for an amount not to exceed $6,325,000.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with SPEC Services, Inc.for Standby Power
and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1,
providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of
$229,187. increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $2,350,935.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget amendment of
$6,069,661 to Area Classification Studies Implementation Plan, Plants Nos. 1
and 2, Job No. J-35,for a revised total project cost of$7,214,661.
14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the
Finance.Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the October 13, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held October 13, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers
Report for the month of September 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify the decision of the General
Manager and authorize him to waive the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
(CFCC), pursuant to District's Ordinance No. OCSD99-01, Section 305.6,
regarding issuance of the Special Purpose Discharge Permits to the City of
Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to allow urban runoff to be
discharged to the District's wastewater system for a one-year period effective
November 1, 1999.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
' Page 6
e. Directors entered into a discussion and asked questions of staff. It was then:
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-18, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures,
Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Relating tot) Adjust the Assistant General
Manager's pay range (E20) maximum from $136,680 to $148,836; 2) Move the
Director of Information Technology classification from pay range E17 ($75,876-
$119,784) to pay range E18 ($85,992-$139,464); 3) Move the Warehouse
Supervisor classification from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236) to pay range E9
($55,212-$78,156); 4) Move the Contracts & Purchasing Supervisor classification
from pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156)to pay range Ell ($60,828-$86,064);
5) Create Contracts Specialist classification at pay range E2 ($39,252-$55,488);
6) Create Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,064-
$70,848); 7) Reinstate the Safety and Emergency Response Specialist
classification at pay range E8 ($52,500-$74,292); and 8) Create Information
Technology Strategic Implementation Leader classification at pay range El
($60,828-$86,064).
15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins,Vice
Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee.
The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meetings held on September 28 and October 12, 1999 to be
filed.
16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve plans and specifications for
Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-55;2)Approve
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Ararat Construction Co., Inc. dba Ark
Construction Co. for Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-55,
for an amount not to exceed $243,000.
17. Actions re Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan,
prepared by Environmental Science Associates:
a. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, gave a brief report on the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jon Ely, representing the Southeast Neighborhood
Association of Huntington Beach of approximately 1,600 homes, requested the
comment period be given an extended deadline. Although he liked Scenario 2
for the District's treatment operational plan, he didn't think it was realistic.
Garry Brown, representing the Orange County Coastkeepers, stated his
organization was not able to respond to the EIR as they are newly organized.
Their preference, however, is for full secondary treatment.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
Page 7
Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion to extend the comment period
forthe EIR.
It was moved and seconded to extend the approval of the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan to November 17, 1999,
The motion failed with 5 aye votes and 14 nay votes.
b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the written comments
received for the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999
Strategic Plan be received and ordered filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan prepared by
Environmental Science Associates.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-19, Making Certain Findings Relative to Significant Environmental
Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999
Strategic Plan; adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and authorizing the filing of a
Notice of Determination.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-20, Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for
the 1999 Strategic Plan has been completed in compliance with CEQA.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 99-21 adopting the 1999 Strategic Plan and designating Scenario 2,
the"Preferred Alternative"as the District's new treatment operational plan.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to file a Notice of
Determination.
18. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos.
18(a)(1), (2) and (3).
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:
The Board convened in closed session at 9:15 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 18(a)(1), (2) and (3).
The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 18(a)(4), and no report was given.
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:37 p.m.,the Board reconvened in regular session.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/27/99
' Page 8
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Secretary of a Board of eoM of
Orange Coun`y Sanitation,District
HAwp.cta�genda%Board Mlnutes\1999 Board Knutes*92299.dx
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
21797 RPI/Bio Gro 9 87,394.81 Residuals Removal MO 4-26.95
21798 Blue Cross of California 176,626.02 Medical Insurance Premium
21799 Bristol Systems, Inc. 47,160.42 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
21800 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 29.119.44 12 Computer Workstations& 1 Dell Inspiron Notebook Computer
21801 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 75,736.80 Natural Gas-Spec a P-170
21802 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 42.471.50 Consulting Services-FIS Support
21803 Hewlett-Packard 60,640.65 Lab Supplies
21804 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 26,773.25 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
21805 Pacific Investment Management Co. 121,809.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95.97
21806 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 121,500.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21807 Southern California Edison 74,326.54 Power
21808 StudioVisia 25,360.00 Computer Consulting Services
21809 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 34,969.32 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21810 U.S.Geological Survey 92,000.00 Ocean Monitoring Program-Bottom Mapping
21811 Ark Construction Company 66,612.96 Construction Pi-444
21812 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 136,896.75 Construction 132-65
21813 Southern Contracting Company 201,571.00 Construction P247-1
Or 21814 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,998.58 Long Distance Telephone Service
y 21815 Great American Printing Co. 131.53 Office Supplies
.- 21816 Aearo Company 1,540.00 Safety Supplies
21817 Airborne Express 31.15 Air Freight
21818 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 1,718.47 Plumbing Supplies
21819 American Airlines 6,840.94 Travel Services
21820 American Fisheries Society 198.45 Publication
21821 American Management Association 1,425.00 Registration
21822 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 472.00 Lab Supplies
21823 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
21824 Appleone Employment Service 12,003.13 Temporary Employment Services
21825 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 610.94 Audio Video Services
21826 Awards&Trophies By Bea 42.02 Plaques
21827 AMAI/Keys Productivity Center 159.00 Registration
21828 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Service
21829 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 120.16 Telephone Service
21830 AT&T Wireless Service 4,073.36 Cellular Telephone Service
21831 AT&T Wireless Service 9,490.42 Cellular Telephone Service
21832 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
21833 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 415.02 Electrical Supplies
21834 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 3,893.18 Telephone Installation
21835 Battelle 5,162.00 Engineering Services Pi-51
Page 1 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 911118/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21836 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries
21837 Bell Pipe 8 Supply Co. 450.50 Valve Supplies
21838 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 27.76 Office Supplies
21839 Big Tex Trailers 4,635.93 20 Ft. Utility Trailer
21840 Boise Radiator Service 380.38 Truck Repairs
21841 Builders Book, Inc. 201.26 Publication
21842 Bureau of National Affairs 1,648.58 Subscription
21843 Business Objects Users Conference 795.00 Registration
21844 C.S.U.F. Foundation 8,750.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research
21845 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 9.21 Service Agreement
21846 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor
21647 Camel Corp. 10,672.46 UPS Batteries
21848 Canus Corporation 16,225.99 Fiber Optic Cable
21849 Cad R. Nelson, P.E. 250.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41
21850 Carlton V. Philips,Jr. 1,208.15 Legal Service-Porter Plating
21851 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 3,399.00 Engineering Services P1-62
21852 W.A.Chamslrom Co., Inc. 740.70 Once Supplies
21853 Chem Lab Supplies 213.35 Chemical
n 21854 City of Fountain Valley 122.47 Sewer Line Inspection 3-35R
Y 21655 Clemson University 4,770.00 Training Registration
r� 21856 Coast Fire Equipment 5.942.91 Service Agreement
21857 Cole-Partner Instrument Co. 217.17 Lab Supplies
21858 Compaq Computer Corporation 717.62 Computer Supplies
21859 Compressor Components Of California 1,293.00 Pump Supplies
21860 Connell GM Parts 49.45 Truck Supplies
21861 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 4,104.52 Electrical Supplies
21862 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 14.81 Plumbing Supplies
21863 Continental Construction 3,338.61 Service Contract- Electrical Repair
21864 Converse Consultants 159.50 Testing Services P2-65
21865 Cooper Energy Services 4,556.72 Engine Supplies
21866 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
21867 Corporate Express Imaging 321.10 Misc. Computer Supplies
21868 Corporate Express 1,020.27 Office Supplies
21869 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.94 Truck Parts
21870 Cotelligent 271.25 Professional Services-Computer
21871 County of Orange 99.00 Permit Fees
21872 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,038.80 Electrical Supplies
21873 Creative Business Concepts 375.25 Professional Service-Computer
21874 CH2M Hill 3.683.62 Professional Service-Odor Screening
21875 Confidential Mgt. Services, Inc. 552.53 Investigation Service
Page 2 of 14 ^
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21876 CPI-The Altemalve Supplier, Inc. 1,867.12 Lab Supplies
21877 CWEA Membership 45.00 Membership
21878 Dapper Tire Co. 707.94 Truck Tires
21879 David R.Woodruff,Agricultural Consultant 7,930.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Sites Soil Sampling&Analysis
21880 David's Tree Service 4,675.00 Tree Removal
21881 Debin Enterprises 3,327.32 Hot Water Boiler-Admin. Bldg.
21882 DeZurik C/O Miscu/Southwest 678.83 Valves
21883 Don Maurer 2,520.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
21884 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 197.29 Paint Supplies
21885 Electronic Transmission Smog System 20.70 Electrical Supplies
21886 Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
21887 Environmental Data Solutions Grips,L.L.0 9,600.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into.Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
21888 Environmental Express 1,616.67 Lab Supplies
21889 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,205.57 Professional Services-Legislative
21890 F. H. Pumps 1,304.03 Pump Supplies
p 21891 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 257.72 Maint. Service Agreement
& 21892 Faxpress, Inc. 2,248.63 Office Supplies
r' 21893 FedEx Corporation 155.24 Air Freight
n 21894 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
7 21895 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,448.03 Lab Supplies
w 21896 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 50.00 Concrete Cutting
21897 Fountain Valley Camera 66.67 Photo Supplies
21898 Foxboro Company 18.71 Publication
21899 Franklin Covey 794.85 Office Supplies
21900 Gamatl-Callahan Company 2,465.32 Chemicals
21901 GTE California 1,555.55 Telephone Services
21902 Gierich-Mitchell, Inc. 11,487.24 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
21903 Glenn Lukos&Associates 8,168.54 Engineering Service 241
21904 Glenn's Tackle Shop 10.45 Lab Supplies
21905 Graphic Distributors 661A6 Photographic Supplies
21906 GTE 14,427.42 Telephone Services
21907 Hach Company 1,881.77 Lab Supplies
21908 Hamilton Company 78.68 Lab Supplies
21909 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 38.15 Plumbing Supplies
21910 Hatch&10rk, Inc. 711.15 Truck Supplies
21911 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 597.30 Catering Services
21912 Hill. Inc. 348.24 Tools
21913 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 304.37 Compressor Parts
21914 Home Depot 110.25 Small Hardware
21915 City of Huntington Beach 14,638.61 Water Use
Page 3 of 14
Claims Paid From 9/1199 to 9/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21916 Industrial Air Compressor 2.801.50 Equipment Rental
21917 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmonary Mgmt 6,946.00 On-Site Pulmonary 8 Audiometric Testing
21918 StateNet 200.00 Online Service
21919 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 688.27 Lab Supplies
21920 Inside CAL/EPA 585.00 Subscription
21921 Interstate Battery Systems 205.64 Batteries
21922 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
21923 IBM Corp. 7.595.37 Maint.Agreement-AS/400
21924 IOMA's Salary Surveys 217.95 Subscription
21926 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 959.87 Safety Supplies
21926 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,605.89 Instrument Supplies
21927 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 12,486.24 Misc.Construction Services
21928 Jay's Catering 1.120.72 Catenng Services
21929 K.S. Dunbar 8 Associates 12.375.00 Engineering Services 2-41
21930 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24.971.41 Medical Insurance Premium
21931 Kelly Paper 40.74 Paper
21932 Industrial Distribution Group 963.70 Tools
r, 21933 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 319.99 Safety Supplies
21934 Lab Support 14,806.99 Temporary Employment Services
b 21935 Labeltronix 827.10 Office Supplies
21936 Voided Check - -
21937 LaserAll Corp. 820.75 Printer Service Agreement
21938 La Motte Chemical Products 377.67 Sulfide Test Kit
21939 Liebert, Cassidy 8 Frierson 97.00 Registration
21940 Long Beach Line-X 990.19 Truck Supplies
21941 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2.694.98 Architectural Services
21942 MarVac Electronics 292.16 Instrument Supplies
21943 Mc Junkin Corporation 1,293.00 Plumbing Supplies
21944 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 207.28 Tools
21945 Mesa Muffler 93.89 Truck Supplies
21946 Microsoft Corporation 2,450.00 Software
21947 Milllronics, Inc. 469.22 Electrical Supplies
21948 Mission Uniform Service 3,355.23 Uniform Rentals
21949 MotoPhoto 72.88 Photographic Services
21950 N. Glantz 8 Son 565.69 Safety Supplies
21951 National Institute of Stds 8 Technology 3,655.00 Lab Supplies
21952 National Microcemp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
21953 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21954 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
Page 4 of 14
Claims Paid From 9/1/99 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21955 Neal Supply Co. 109.74 Plumbing Supplies
21956 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 490.00 Training Registration-Computer
21957 City of Newport Beach 73.35 Water Use
21958 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14,353,37 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
21959 The Norm Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
21960 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.140.85 Office Supplies
21961 Optio Software 1.552.21 Software Maint.
21962 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 15.74 Electrical Supplies
21963 Orrick, Heninglon&Sutcliffe 2,500.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel
21964 Oxygen Service Company 981.49 Specialty Gases
21965 OCS Reprographics 2,230.21 Printing Service-Spec P-173
21966 Pacific Bell 1,846.29 Telephone Services
21967 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,533.03 Plumbing Supplies
21968 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 63.10 Mechanical Supplies
21969 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 442.80 Tires
21970 Parts Unlimited 758.35 Truck Supplies
21971 Peak Technologies 104.08 Lab Supplies
21972 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 19,114.86 Lab Supplies
K 21973 Polydyne, Inc. 12,910.91 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
Y 21974 Power Maintenance International,Inc. 1.582.20 Maintenance Agreement
21975 Power Systems Testing 900.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services
21976 Precision Industries 520.22 Mechanical Supplies
21977 Primary Source 407.87 Office Furniture
21978 Prodata 179.00 Software Maint.
21979 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
21980 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair
21981 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 355.58 Basket Strainers for Polymer Use
21982 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents
21983 RPM Electric Motors 670.07 Electric Motor Repair
21984 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2.125.35 Motor Repair
21985 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 899.43 Mechanical Supplies
21986 Sears Industrial Sales 250.68 Mechanical Supplies
21987 Second-Sun 538.02 Light Fixtures
21988 Shepherd Machinery Co. 349.37 Truck Supplies
21989 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,600.30 Tools/Hardware
21990 Slemon,Larsen&Marsh 20,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
21991 Sigma Chemical Co 2,052.18 Lab Supplies
21992 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 30.29 Plumbing Supplies
21993 SoftChoice 282.31 Software
21994 Southern California Edison Company 2,231.97 Claim Settlement
Page 5 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21995 Southern California Water 66.88 Water Use
21996 Sparklefts 5,947.46 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
21997 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 365.66 Lab Supplies
21998 Sprint 32.10 Long Distance Telephone Service
21999 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service
22000 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 530.73 Office Supplies
22001 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
22002 Sunset Industrial Pans 81.56 Mechanical Supplies
22003 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
22004 Symcas-TSG 1,668.82 Consulting Services
22005 Syscem, Inc. 2,700.00 Software Maint.
22006 SKC-West, Inc. 174.49 Safety Supplies
22007 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 814.41 Electric Cart Parts
22008 Textile Engineering Associates 5.448.92 Belt Press Supplies
22009 The Merdwood Corporation 2,795.28 Professional Services-Blosolids Land Inspection
22010 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 476.56 Mechanical Supplies
22011 Thyssen Dover Elevator 150.00 Elevator Maintenance
22012 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
ri 22013 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sates 61.42 Locks&Keys
Yl 22014 Tropical Plena Nursery, Inc. 16,800.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
a 22016 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 19.74 Truck Supplies
22016 Teksystems 13,468.75 Temporary Employment Services
22017 Ultra Scientific 89.28 Lab Supplies
22018 United Parcel Service 704.80 Parcel Services
22019 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,304.43 Plumbing Supplies
22020 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 187.91 Electrical Supplies
22021 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 12,735.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
22022 Vortex Ventures 575.75 Mechanical Supplies
22023 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10.203.28 Lab Supplies
22024 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards
22025 Water Environment Federation 888.25 Publication
22026 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 23,078.98 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22027 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3.134.23 Instrument Supplies
22028 Wyatt Date Services 269.00 Publication
22029 Xerox Corporation 6,583.00 Copier Leases
22030 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 26.86 Office Supplies
22031 Robed P.Ghirelli 190.74 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
22032 John W. Swindler 120.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22033 David Rodriguez&Nylon Computer 2,317.68 Employee Computer Loan Program
22034 Selwyn D.Mansell 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
Page 6 of 14
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22035 Orange County Sanitation District 1,694.80 Petty Cash Reimb.
22036 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 26,299.05 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
22037 Nat West Markets 66,204.88 COP Letter of Credit Fees
22038 Orange County Sanitation District 422,409.71 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22039 Orange County Water District 142,983.59 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
22040 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 108,285.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22041 Pro Logis Trust 648,496.00 Connection Fees Refund
22042 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 720.00 Registration
22043 American Telephone&Telegmph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service
22044 AWWA 480.00 Registration
22045 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22046 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22D47 Connell GM Parts 380.85 Truck Supplies
22048 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22049 Elser Constructors,Inc. 110.00 Plans&Specs Refund
22050 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
22051 GTE California 1,371.02 Telephone Services
22052 GTE Hawaii 64.27 Telephone Service-3 Way Conference Call
N 22053 Harris&Company 100.00 Registration
q 22054 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,101.87 Dues Deduction
22055 ISSA 200.00 Registration
22056 Labware, Inc. 3,500.00 Registration
22057 Lucci's 105.00 Meeting Expense
22058 MasTec Network Services 2,818.78 Communication Service
22059 Network Construction Services 2,487.00 Construction Services-VoicelData Bldg Rewiring Project
22D60 Oracle Open World 3,390.00 Registration
22061 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22062 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22063 Orange Courier 9.90 Courier Services
22064 OCFA 619.08 Dues Deduction
22065 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22066 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22067 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
22068 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 471.05 Publication
22069 Schreiber Corporation 11.044.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment
22070 Shopping.Com 158.24 Publication
22071 SkillPath Seminars 5,400.00 Training Registration
22072 Softvew Computer Products 643.94 Computer Supplies
22073 Southern California Edison 7,351.17 Power
22074 State of California 125.39 Wage Garnishment
Page 7 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22075 SETAC 465.00 Registration
22078 ThirdWave 5,940.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project
22077 Thompson industrial Supply, Inc. 118.49 Mechanical Supplies
22078 Tri-State Seminar On4he-River 165.00 Seminar Registration
22079 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
22080 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 59.01 Lab Supplies
22081 Edward M.Torres 359.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22082 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 6,000.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22083 Burch Ford 27,341.56 1999 Ford F-250 Truck
22084 Commercial Resources Tax Group 125,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin.
22085 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 188,434.40 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22086 Delta Dental 83,233.20 Dental Insurance Plan
22087 Dionex Corporation 51,389.84 Lab Supplies
22088 DMG-Maximus 66,870.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
22089 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 39,095.45 Professional Services J404
[[[777 22090 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 149,587.57 Misc.Construction Services
22091 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 90.864.23 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
22092 National Plant Services, Inc. 34.906.25 Vacuum Truck Services
ram: 22093 Orange County water District 49,852.80 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
Y 22094 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 25.096.94 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
m 22095 Southern California Edison 57.089.47 Power
22096 Tule RanchlMagan Fans 42.872.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 110,359.66 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
22098 Western States Chemical, Inc. 29,387.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22099 Advanw Constructors, Inc. 108,011.70 Construction 541-1
22100 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 245,160.40 Construction 3-35R&3-11 R
22101 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 48,475.83 Construction 3-38-1 &7-17
22102 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 61,110.00 Construction 2-34R
22103 A.M. Best Company, Inc. 177.90 Subscription
22104 A-Plus Systems 4.244.04 Notices&Ads
22105 AccuStandard, Inc. 266.25 Lab Supplies
22106 Great American Printing Co. 1,996.65 Office Supplies
22107 Aidw Systems, Inc. 81.87 Electrical Supplies
22108 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
22109 Airborne Express 26.50 Air Freight
22110 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies
22111 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 218.90 Mechanical Supplies
22112 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 4,242.62 Plumbing Supplies
22113 American Agencies 55.25 Express Lanes Use
22114 Anaheim Patio&Fireside 1,400.75 Patio Furniture
Page 8 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22115 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 200.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22116 Appleone Employment Service 16,549.31 Temporary Employment Services
22117 Applied Industrial Technology 85.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies
22118 Arcus Data Security 161.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage
22119 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,254.00 Vacuum Truck Services
22120 Awards&Trophies By Bea 363.38 Plaques
22121 Adsorbents&Desiccants Corp.of America 214.90 Electrical Supplies
22122 AMA 1,525.00 Registration
22123 ASCE Continuing Education 445.00 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs.
22124 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 53.12 Telephone Service
22125 AT&T Wireless Service 111.73 Cellular Telephone Service
22126 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 2,491.58 Telephone Installation
22127 Battery Specialties 20.04 Batteries
22128 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 24.34 Office Supplies
22129 Boot Barn 298.24 Reimbursable Safely Shoes
22130 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1,998.52 Engineering Service 3-38-1
22131 Bristol Systems, Inc. 16,495.00 Consulting Services-V2K Project
22132 Builders Book, Inc. 59.12 Publication
22133 California Chamber of Commerce 86.00 Subscription
y 22134 Caltrol, Inc. 877.52 Valves
e 22136 Conus Corporation 96.29 Fiber Optic Cable
22136 Cappo,Inc. 120.00 Registration
22137 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 530.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality
22138 Carollo Engineers 11,044.28 Engineering Services P143, P2-50&J-34-1
22139 Century Paint 95.88 Paint Supplies
22140 City of Fountain Valley 15,484.40 Water Use
22141 Coast Automatic Transmission 1,262.80 Transmission Repair
22142 Compressor Components Of California 6,969.27 Pump Supplies
22143 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 8,185.30 Electrical Supplies
22144 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 65.64 Plumbing Supplies
22145 Converse Consultants 955.63 Consulting Services P2-65
22146 Cooper Energy Services 770.99 Engine Supplies
22147 Corporate Express Imaging 2,120.52 Misc.Computer Supplies
22148 Corporate Express 1.354.49 Office Supplies
22149 Cost Containment Solutions 322.60 Worker's Comp. Services
22160 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 17.05 Truck Parts
22151 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 139.98 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
22152 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,245.95 Electrical Supplies
22153 Cylec Industries 12,002.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18
22154 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 2,401.30 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers
Page 9 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22155 David's Tree Service 10,715.00 Tree Removal
22156 Del Mar Analytical 2,228.00 Biosolids Analysis
22157 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 20.429.40 10 Computer Workstations
22158 OeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 176.65 Valves
22159 Diamond H Recognition 1.754.84 Employee Service Awards
22160 Dickson's, Inc. 9,258.00 3 Portable Air Conditioners
22161 Dovatron Manufacturing So Cal 335.00 Source Control Permit Refund
22162 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 142.24 Paint Supplies
22163 Dynalco Corp 802.00 Instrument Maint. Service
22164 Edwin M. Perkins 3,808.93 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance
22165 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 560.00 Safety Training
22166 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22167 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 23,291.72 Consulting Service-FIS V2K&Support
22168 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies
22169 Fairbanks Swiss, Inc. 258.50 Maint. Service Agreement
22170 FedEx Corporation 454.99 Air Freight
22171 Filter Supply Company 27.43 Filters
22172 Fine Science Tools, Inc. 271.01 Tools
rt 22173 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 578.74 Lab Supplies
q 22174 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,016.01 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
22175 Fountain Valley Camera 60.40 Photo Supplies
22176 Fry's Electronics 993.55 Computer Supplies
22177 Ganshl Lumber Company 130.56 Lumber/Hardware
22178 Ganafi-Callahan Company 1,386.74 Chemicals
22179 GTE California 6,347.88 Telephone Services
22180 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
22181 WW Grainger, Inc. 569.98 Compressor Supplies
22182 Graseby S.T.I. 813.61 Engine Supplies
22183 Graybar Electric Company 1.242.97 Electrical Supplies
22184 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.32 Janitorial Supplies
22185 Haaker Equipment Company 97.96 Truck Supplies
22186 Hach Company 511.42 Lab Supplies
22187 Hams&Company 100.00 Registration
22188 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 157.55 Catering Services
22189 Hewlett-Packard 208.92 Lab Supplies
22190 Hilti, Inc. 739.36 Tools
22191 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1.793.92 Compressor Parts
22192 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium
22193 Holmes 8.Narver, Inc. 2.840.17 Engineering Services 240
22194 Home Depot 195.31 Small Hardware
Page 10 of 14
n
Claim Paid From 911/99 to 911&99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22195 Hub Auto Supply 102.16 Truck Parts
22196 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 871.28 Pump Supplies
22197 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 1.374.01 Lab Supplies
22198 Imaging Plus, Inc. 456.47 Office Supplies
22199 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 48.22 Lab Supplies
22200 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use
22201 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 3,263.30 Safety Supplies
22202 J&B Auto Parts 25.86 Auto Parts&Supplies
22203 J.D. Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration
22204 Jay's Catering 568.79 Catering Services
22205 Keystone Analine Corporation 4.857.12 Chemical
22208 Industrial Distribution Group 939.22 Tools
22207 Kris Kaligian 275.00 Contractual Services-Writing
22208 Lab Support 7,193.93 Temporary Employment Services
22209 LaserAll Corp. 233.18 Printer Service Agreement
22210 La Motie Chemical Products 29.22 Sulfide Test Kit
22211 Lexis-Nexis 357.94 Books& Publications
22212 Liebert,Cassidy&Frierson 800.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
rt 22213 Line-X Protective Coatings 291.55 Truck Supplies
7 22214 Voided Check - -
22215 MarVac Electronics 49.33 Instrument Supplies
r
22218 MasTec Network Services 8,878.80 Communication Service
22217 Matt Chlor, Inc. 1,444.85 Valves
22218 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 60.55 Plumbing Supplies
22219 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 979.93 Boxes
22220 Medlin Controls Co. 1,771.84 Instrument Supplies
22221 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,061.68 Mechanical Repairs
22222 Millitronics C/O RMB Engineering 69.40 Electrical Supplies
22223 Minnesota Western 219.89 Office Supplies
22224 Mission Uniform Service 3,459.51 Uniform Rentals
22225 Monitor Labs, Inc. 3,986.58 Instrument Maint.
22226 Moreland&Associates 23,737.75 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
22227 Motion Industries 306.37 Pump Supplies
22228 MotoPhoto 167.73 Photographic Services
22229 MGD Technologies, Inc. 9,565.00 4 Temporary Flow Monitors-Beach Closure
22230 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 7,051.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
22231 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,189.81 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
22232 Ninyo&Moore 8,338.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
22233 Norms Refrigeration 173.75 Electric Parts
22234 Odor Management, Inc. 399.02 Chemical
Page 11 of 14
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22235 Office Depot Business Services Div. 531.50 Office Supplies
22236 Orange County Pump Co. 120.68 Pump Supplies
22237 The Register 137.20 Subscription
22238 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 671.53 Electrical Supplies
22239 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,165.78 Fittings
22240 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel
22241 Ortiz Fire Protection 740.00 Service Agreement
22242 Osage Systems Group 8,360.14 Computer Software
22243 Oxygen Service Company 1,037.25 Specialty Gases
22244 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 158.26 Electrical Supplies
22245 Pacific Bell 16.30 Telephone Services
22246 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
22247 Pacific Mechanical Supply 431.63 Plumbing Supplies
22248 Pagenet 1,954.49 Rental Equipment
22249 Panametrics 70.00 Battery Pack for Flow Meter
22250 Peak Technologies 1,147.62 Lab Supplies
22251 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 786.60 Filters
t,. 22252 Polydyne, Inc. 16,298.92 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22253 Praxan, Inc. 820.11 Lab Supplies
Y 22254 Primary Source 16,337.92 Office Furniture
ai 22255 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2.867.77 Mechanical Supplies
22256 Putzmeister 181.42 Pump Supplies
22257 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2.393.48 Trash Removal
22258 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
22259 Related Visual 419.61 Office Supplies
22260 Reliastar 20,581.94 Employee Medical Health Premium
22261 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,428.54 Life Insurance Premium
22262 Rosemount I Uniloc 675.05 Instrument Supplies
22263 Roto Rooter-S.O.C.#51 869.25 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs.
22264 Rudolph Dew&Assoc., L.L.C. 1,000.00 Career Consulting Service
22265 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 429.76 Motor Repairs
22266 RM Controls 86.73 Instrument Supplies
22267 RPM Electric Motors 1,948.09 Electric Motor Repair
22268 RSA Sutter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials
22269 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 5,500.00 Sewer Pipe Repair
22270 Sears Industrial Sales 128.60 Mechanical Supplies
22271 Seaventures 4,650.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
22272 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 3,450.84 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
22273 Second-Sun 99.09 Light Fixtures
22274 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 4,705.88 Tools
Page 12 of 14 °
Claims Paid From 911199 to SMS199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22275 Shepard Machinery 444.76 Tools
22276 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 105.36 Tools/Hardware
22277 Supelco, Inc. 2,714.80 Lab Supplies
22278 So.Cal.Gas Company 15,771.60 Natural Gas
22279 Soco-Lynch Corp. 1.259.90 Janitorial Supplies
22280 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 465.30 Emission Fees
22281 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 327.39 Lab Supplies
22282 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
22283 Sun-Belt Landscape &Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
22284 Sunset Industrial Pans 113.46 Mechanical Supplies
22285 Society of Environmental Toxicology&Chemistry 555.00 Registration
22286 Solar Turbines, Inc. 308.64 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
22287 SPSS,Inc. 1,621.39 Software Upgrade
22288 The Register 1,927.80 Notices&Ads
22289 Thermo Quest 525.20 Lab Supplies
22290 Thomas Bros. Maps 15,460.00 Printing
22291 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,909.82 Mechanical Supplies
22292 Thompson Publishing Group 254.00 Publication
rrt 22293 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 65.00 Locks&Keys
y 22294 Tornell&Cotten 4,493.40 Legal Service-Burge
w 22295 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 80.00 Seminar Registration
22296 Trident Data Systems 600.00 Professional Service-Network Security
22297 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 15,559.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
22298 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 83.19 Truck Supplies
22299 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,420.00 Lab Services
22300 Two Wheels One Planet 342.47 Bicycle Supplies
22301 TPC Training Systems, Inc. 431.00 Training Software
22302 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 2,189.00 Equipment Certification
22303 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters
22304 U.S.Postal Service 1,400.00 Postage
22305 Ultra Scientific 93.52 Lab Supplies
22306 United Parcel Service 57.77 Parcel Services
22307 Unocal Corporation 49.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1
22308 UCI Regents 100.00 Subscription
22309 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,509.21 Plumbing Supplies
22310 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 958.90 Electrical Supplies
22311 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 5,400.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
22312 Verne's Plumbing 135.00 Plumbing Supplies
22313 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.342.90 Vision Service Premium
22314 VCI Mechanical 1.640.00 Electrical Service
Page 13 of 14
Claims Paid From 9/1199 to 9115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22315 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 11,022.95 Lab Supplies
22316 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,953.36 Security Guards
22317 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 950.92 Wind Sock Frame
22318 William Garrett 4,725.00 Witness Fee-Cartel
22319 Witeg Scientific 437.65 Lab Supplies
22320 Xerox Corporation 6,204.47 Copier Leases
22321 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit
22322 3CMA 295.00 Membership
22323 CNA Trust 11,979.30 Construction 541-1
22324 Union Bank of California 5,386.21 Construction 3.38.1
22325 Janice Debay 184.58 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimb.
22326 Donald F. McIntyre 643.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22327 Orange County Sanitation District 14.986.27 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
22328 Orange County Sanitation District 503.11 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,790,609.26
Payroll Disbursements
15528- 15530 Directors'Paychecks $ 1,520.04 Payroll 9/1199
n 15531 - 15531 Employee Paycheck 329.29 Adjustment
b 15532- 15662 Employee Paychecks 173,876.46 Biweekly Payroll 918199
> 15663-15665 Employee Paychecks 2,873.06 Adjustment
41272.41707 Direct Deposit Statements 655,739.87 Biweekly Payroll 9/8/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 834,338.72
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,889.98 August Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 161,339.96 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
Stale Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 133.056.63 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 45.539.83 Ouarterly Liquidity Fee on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 489,826.40
Total Claims Paid 9/1199-9115199 $ 7.114.774.38
Page 14 of 14
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22329 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart E 610.00 Legal Services-I.N.S. Fees
22330 Orange County Sanitation District 433,195.95 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22331 Academic Press 45.00 Publication
22332 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 1,097.06 Ceiling Tile
22333 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 130.73 Telephone Service
22334 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22335 Cartier Corp.Training 2,600.00 Registration
22336 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22337 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 463.19 Electrical Supplies
22338 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 181.73 Plumbing Supplies
22339 1999 CWEA S.Regional Training&Safety Conference 105.00 Registration
22340 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22341 Employment Development Dept. 2,990.00 Reimbursable Unemployment Insurance
22342 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 11,350.80 Consulting Services-FIS Support
�J 22343 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
�1 22344 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
r. 22346 GTE California 983.43 Telephone Services
�. 22346 Graphic Design Book Club 31.90 Books
22347 Harbour Engineering Group 3,929.00 Pump Supplies
In 22348 Harvard Business Review 85.00 Subscription
22349 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. 88.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22350 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.116.18 Dues Deduction
22351 Irvine Ranch Water District 21.36 Water Use
22352 IBM Corp. 6,233.74 Maint.Agreement-AS1400
22353 J.D. Edwards 1.530.00 Training Registration
22354 Keystone Analine Corporation 14.144.43 Chemical
22355 MarVac Electronics 45A1 Instrument Supplies
22356 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 74.44 Tools
22357 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 44.46 Plumbing Supplies
22358 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22359 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment
22360 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 548.26 Electrical Supplies
22361 OCEA 619.08 Dues Deduction
22362 Pacific Bell 2,128.49 Telephone Services
22363 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22364 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22365 Peace Officers Council of CA 711.00 Dues Deduction
22366 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 2,907.11 Lab Supplies
22367 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 101.51 Freight
22368 Safety-Kleen 409.99 Service Agreement
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22369 Schneider Electric 410A8 Software Maint.Agreement
22370 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1.835.98 Tools
22371 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 247.22 Tools/Hardware
22372 So.Cal.Gas Company 3,535.79 Natural Gas
22373 State of California 132.26 Wage Garnishment
22374 Summit Steel 469.18 Metal
22375 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
22376 Corina M.Chaudhry 115.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22377 Chades F.Wnsor 589.48 Meefingrrraining Expense Reimb.
22378 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 675.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22379 AKM Consulting Engineers 46.103.75 Consulting Services 11-20
22380 Blue Cross of California 178,665.34 Medical Insurance Premium
22381 Camllo Engineers 59,34420 Engineering Services-Pl-36-2 8.L25-4
22382 DGA Consultants, Inc. 64.150.88 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
22383 Flo-Systems,Inc. 40,916.99 Pump Supplies
22384 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 80.538.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
22385 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 29,690.92 Belt Filter Press Supplies
`Y 22386 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 37,955.63 Misc.Construction Services
22387 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,003.66 Medical Insurance Premium
~ 22388 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 69,706.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
22389 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 236,277.70 Engineering Services J-42
22390 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 220,513.73 Lab Supplies
22391 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 112,460.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22392 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 27,906.50 Emission Fees
22393 SPEC Services, Inc. 254,895.76 Engineering Services J-33-1
22394 Tran Consulting Engineers 33,950.00 Consulting Services-Misc. Small Capital Projects
22395 Tule RanchrMagan Farms 36.146.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22396 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 45,070.50 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
22397 WoodmB,Spradlin&Smart 94,325.84 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
22398 Ark Construction Company 67,245.12 Construction P1d44
22399 KPRS Construction Services,Inc. 69,750.00 Construction P2-65
22400 Southern Contracting Company 396,676.00 Construction P247-1
22401 Systems Integrated 33,112.14 Construction Services J-31-3
22402 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,080.70 Long Distance Telephone Service
22403 A-Plus Systems 825.60 Notices&Ads
22404 Aearo Company 904.00 Safety Supplies
22406 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies
22406 Airborne Express 91.75 Air Freight
22407 American Media,Inc. 536.00 Training Materials
22408 American Express CFC Remittances 6.920.16 Purchasing Card Program
22409 American Seals West 167.01 Gaskets
Page 2 of 7
Claims Paid From 9/16199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22410 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,066.72 Training Materials
22411 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 585.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22412 Appleone Employment Service 6,361.13 Temporary Employment Services
22413 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,066.00 Vacuum Truck Services
22414 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 713.35 Waste Removal
22415 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 1.323.88 Audio Video Services
22416 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 6,950.00 Hoist
22417 Awards&Trophies By Bea 45.26 Plaques
22418 Azur Environmental 329.74 Lab Supplies
22419 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 331.75 Telephone Service
22420 AT&T Wireless Service 3.308.60 Cellular Telephone Service
22421 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 271.05 Office Supplies
22422 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,329.22 Engineering Services 3-38-1
22423 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc.Inc. 1.856.42 Compressor
22424 Bristol Systems, Inc. 19.417.92 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
22425 Brown&Caldwell 11,115.63 Engineering Services P7-37
22426 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7,016.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
22427 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 14,27524 Electrical Supplies
22428 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,895.00 Pump Supplies
rt 22429 Southern California Marine Institute 20.00 Mooring Fees-Ocean Monitoring
22430 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1,133.00 Engineering Services Pi-62
22431 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 2,778.24 Office Furniture
22432 Charles P.Crowley Co. 338.00 Instrument Parts
22433 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 142.50 Professional Services-Ergonomic
22434 Sun International 289.52 Lab Supplies
22435 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 18,360.00 Professional Services- Operafional Response Procedures
22436 Computers America, Inc. 250.67 Computer Supplies
22437 Connell GM Parts 219.01 Truck Supplies
22438 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 18,521.93 Electrical Supplies
22439 Cooper Energy Services 5,798.06 Engine Supplies
22440 Corporate Express 254.40 Office Supplies
22441 Corporate Image Maintenance, Ina 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09
22442 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 5.63 Truck Parts
22443 Colelligent 1.202.25 Professional Services-Computer
22444 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 2.051.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22445 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,092.78 Communication Equipment Repair
22446 Auditor Controller Collections 17.50 Permit Fees
22447 County Wholesale Electric Co. 498.63 Electrical Supplies
22446 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
22449 Cytec Industries 16.808.58 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
22450 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22451 CNA Consulting&Engineering 16,139.00 Professional Services-Bar Code Inventory Study
22452 CPI-The Altemative Supplier, Inc. 1,753.00 Lab Supplies
22453 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals
22464 CSMFO Career Development 550.00 Registration
22455 CWEA Membership 95.00 Membership
22456 1999 CWEA S.Regional Training&Safety Conference 1,110.00 Registration
22457 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis
22458 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 6,767.78 3 Computers&5 Monitors
22459 DeZunk C/O Misco/SouthWest 336.18 Valves
22460 Dionex Corporation 1,977.31 Lab Supplies
22461 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 473.56 Pelnt Supplies
22462 DOB Engineering,Inc. 2.620.00 Temporary Employment Services
22463 DME, Inc. 557.19 Compressor Parts
22464 Electronic Transmission Smog System 9.90 Electrical Supplies
22466 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22466 Environmental Data Solutions Grips,L.L.0 3.840.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
22467 Environmental Express 978.75 Lab Supplies
22468 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,055.87 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
22469 Fairchild Aerial Photography Collection 75.00 Photographic Service
22470 FedEx Corporation 107.26 Air Freight
22471 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 3,703.84 Plumbing Supplies
22472 Fibertron 298.15 Fiber Optic Cable
22473 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,089.32 Lab Supplies
22474 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 9.415.39 Engineering Services P-183
22475 Fountain Valley Camera 176.59 Photo Supplies
22476 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 562.50 Truck Wash Tickets
22477 FLW, Inc. 256.45 Electrical Supplies
22478 FM International,Inc. 11.956.18 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System
22479 Ganahl Lumber Company 261.99 Lumber/Hardware
22480 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,221.67 Fiberglass Repair
22481 GTE California 36.49 Telephone Services
22482 Genium Publishing Corp. 126.15 Publication
22483 Gerke Consulting 3.600.00 Registration
22484 Glenn Lukas&Associates 3.640.05 Engineering Service 2-41
22486 Graphic Distributors 2.144.23 Photographic Supplies
22486 Graseby S.T.I. 816.93 Engine Supplies
22467 Haaker Equipment Company 1,006.78 Truck Supplies
22488 Hach Company 66.11 Lab Supplies
22469 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples
22490 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 16.56 Plumbing Supplies
22491 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 386.00 Catering Services
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9/30199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22492 Hewlett-Packard 642.76 Lab Supplies
22493 Holtman Southwest Corporation 21,108.70 Maint. Services-Sewer Cleaning
22494 Home Depot 337.07 Small Hardware
22495 Hopkins Technical Products 4,397A8 Pump Supplies
22496 City of Huntington Beach 14.614.45 Water Use
22497 Hunts'Final Phase 1,445.00 Misc.Construction Services
22498 Idexx 7,788.02 Lab Supplies
22499 Infotec Santa Ana 1,200.00 Consulting Service-SMS Implementation
22600 Interstate Battery Systems 429.55 Batteries
22501 Irvine Photo Graphics 29.09 Photographic Services
22502 IBM Corp. 56.44 Printer Service Agreement
22503 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 193.43 Safety Supplies
22504 Jay's Catering 1,093.63 Catering Services
22605 Johnstone Supply 221.43 Electrical Supplies
22506 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 9,376.00 Engineering Services 2-41
22507 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 2,760.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
22508 Industrial Distribution Group 1,799.69 Toole
22509 Lab Support 11.695.06 Temporary Employment Services
22610 LaserAll Corp. 25.00 Printer Service Agreement
rt 22511 La Motte Chemical Products 130.92 Sulfide Test Kit
22512 Lee&Ro, Inc. 18,229.79 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
t^ 22513 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,580.00 Architectural Services
22514 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 7,500.00 Engineering Services 2-37
22515 Maintenance Products,Inc. 1,823.13 Mechanical Supplies
22516 MarVac Electronics 219.30 Instrument Supplies
22517 Massachusetts Ocean Technology Network 285.00 Workshop Registration
22518 MasTec Network Services 8,878.60 Communication Equipment-Cable
22519 Mc Junkln Corp--Ontario Branch 213.95 Plumbing Supplies
22520 Minarik 1,461.56 Instrument Supplies
22521 Mission Uniform Service 3.368.37 Uniform Rentals
22522 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 289.27 Publications
22523 Monitor Labs, Inc. 120.71 Instrument Maint.
22524 Morton Salt 260.29 Sall
22525 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
22526 National Safety Council 500.00 Membership
22527 Business Training&Development Services 1,000.00 Seminar Registration
22528 Neal Supply Co. 2020 Plumbing Supplies
22529 Ninyo&Moore 16.336.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98
22530 Netsol/Network Solution 11,474.61 Engineering Services-Voica/Data Cable Upgrade
22531 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.771.07 Office Supplies
22532 The Ohmart CorporationAtEGA Corp. 306.57 Instrument Supplies
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. vendor Amount Description
22533 Ortiz Fire Protection 634.00 Service Agreement
22534 Oxygen Service Company 2,433.26 Specialty Gases
22535 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 25.32 Electrical Supplies
22536 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,100.81 Plumbing Supplies
22537 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 625.48 Electrical Supplies
22538 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 185.86 Mechanical Supplies
22539 Parts Unlimited 382.35 Truck Supplies
22540 Amy Poulsen 1,012.09 Watershed Mgmt.Expert
22541 Plnnade One 2,250.00 Registration
22642 Polydyne, Inc. 24.313.51 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22543 Projects Partners 10.806.78 Temporary Employment Services
22544 Pryor Resources, Inc. 3,000.00 Training Registration
22545 Public Officials for Water Env. Reform 335.00 Conference Registration
22546 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 79.23 Mechanical Supplies
22547 Pulzmeister 130.81 Pump Supplies
22548 Quanta"Environmental Services 050.00 Analytical Service
22549 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
22550 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
r. 22551 Related Visual 1,351.67 Office Supplies
22562 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,557.36 Lire Insurance Premium
22653 Restek Corp 796.00 Training Registration
22664 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 336.16 Auto Repair
22565 Rutan&Tucker Alomeys at Law 9,581.54 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
22558 RSA Sutter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials
22557 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 480.51 Mechanical Supplies
22558 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 4,069.19 Specialty Gases
22559 Second-Sun 244.65 Light Fixtures
22560 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
22561 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 191.29 Plumbing Supplies
22562 Snap On Industrial 1,910.89 Hardware
22583 South Coast Water 20.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
22564 Sparkletts 1,908.23 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
22565 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 511.83 Janitorial Supplies
22566 Steve Casada Construction Co. 20,822.20 Construction Services-Hunt. Beach Sewer Repair
22567 Sunset Ford 342.81 Truck Supplies
22568 Super Chem Corporation 334.03 Chemicals
22569 SARBS-CWE A 320.00 Membership
22570 SCECS(S.Calif. Environmental Chemists Society) 160.00 Registration
22571 SKC-West, Inc. 889.45 Safety Supplies
22572 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 661.85 Electric Cart Parts
22573 Mag Systems 82BA5 Instrument Supplies
Page 8 of 7
Claims Paid From 9/16/99 to 9130199
Wamnt No. Vendor Amount Description
22574 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,140.90 Mechanical Supplies
22575 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance
22576 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 12.93 Locks&keys
22577 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 538.81 Truck Supplies
22578 Teksystems 16,375.00 Temporary Employment Services
22579 Ultra Scientific 239.87 Lab Supplies
22580 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 250.DD Membership
22581 United Parcel Service 570.63 Parcel Services
22582 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,289.94 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
22583 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,993.91 Plumbing Supplies
22584 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,353.90 Door Repair
22586 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 23,779.78 Lab Supplies
22586 Managememt Health Services, Inc. 9,460.00 On-Site Health Service
22587 Western Metro Unit 624.09 Filters
22588 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 14,528.25 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22589 Xerox Corporation 8,510.00 Copier Leases
22690 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 33.14 Office Supplies
22591 Zemarc Corp. 2,239.59 Pump Maint.Service
22592 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Mlcrofiltration Test Unit
22593 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 1,429.46 Construction 7.17
22594 Shabbir S. Basrai 330.30 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22595 David D.Halverson 177.75 Meeting7rmining Expense Reimb.
22596 Michael L.Heinz 1,264.22 Meelingri mining Expense Relmb.
22597 Antonino Pira 1,222.06 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimb,
22598 George L.Robertson 131.60 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb,
22599 Orange County Sanitation District 987.10 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,390,544.27
Payroll Dlabumemento
15666-15813 Employee Paychecks $ 182.807.55 Biweekly Payroll 9122/99
15814- 15816 Employee Paychecks 2.806.14 Termination&Adjustment
41708-42147 Direct Deposit Statements 684,142.81 Biweekly Payroll 9122199
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869.816.50
Total Claims Paid 9116199.9130199 $ 4,280,360.77
Page 7 of 7
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22600 Orange County Sanitation District $ 427.712.67 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22601 Southern Califomla Edison 78.885.33 Power
22602 Abeam 165.01 Hardware
22603 APEX Communications 951.28 Communication Equipment Upgrade
22604 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service
22605 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22606 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc,Inc. 53.00 Freight
22607 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22608 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 478.05 Electrical Supplies
22609 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 323.00 Plumbing Supplies
22610 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration
22611 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22612 Executive Excellence 2,500.00 Human Resources Software
22613 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,766.43 Plumbing Supplies
22614 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
22615 City of Fullerton 360.21 Water Use
22616 GTE California 1.667.40 Telephone Services
22617 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 57.10 Freight
22618 Harcourt Brace&Co.and Subsidiaries 86.82 Publication
22619 City of Huntington Beach 24.50 Water Use
22620 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.116.18 Dues Deduction
22621 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
22622 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 249.37 Safety Supplies
22623 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 20.149.86 Misc.Construction Services
22624 Jendham,Inc. 795.00 Registration
22625 Industrial Distribution Group 25.05 Tools
22626 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 435.60 Safety Supplies
22627 Lucci's 105.00 Meeting Expense
22628 LAOUG-Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership
22629 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 943.42 Tools
22630 Optio Software 2,850.00 Optio Forms Implementation
22631 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22632 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22633 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 301.55 Fittings
22634 OCEA 627.52 Dues Deduction
22835 Pacific Bell 20.14 Telephone Services
22636 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22837 Panametrics 8.70 Freight
22638 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22639 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 10/1199 to 10/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22640 Primary Source 634A8 O18ce Furniture
22641 Proficiency Capital Corporation 3,222.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
22642 Quest Software 2.170.00 Service Agreement
22643 Ryan Herce Products Corp. 64.11 Freight
22644 RE Hughes Co, Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies
22645 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1,400.00 Membership
22646 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 331.72 Tools/Hardware
22647 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
22648 Snap-On Incorporated 4,912.07 Tools
22649 State of California 130.23 Wage Garnishment
22650 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 6.452.19 COP Trustee Services
22651 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.830.90 Mechanical Supplies
22052 The Training Clinic 595.00 Workshop Registration
22653 United Way 307.83 Employee Contributions
22654 Donald F.McIntyre 426.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22655 Michael D. Moore 807.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22656 George L.Robertson 200.38 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimb.
22667 Henry R.Salgado 991.10 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22858 Michelle Tuchman 451.82 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22659 Marco Polo S.Velasco 370.64 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22660 Robert Bell&Fry's Electronics 599,26 Employee Computer Loan Program
22661 Robert Bell 8 NexCom 1,882.29 Employee Computer Loan Program
22662 Victor Ferguson&Micro Center 870.84 Employee Computer Loan Program
22663 Wayne Aegerter 8 Microbon Computers 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
22664 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 84,491.30 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
22585 Barclays Bank PLC 90,667.39 COP Letter of Credit
22666 RPI/Blo Gro 103,232.29 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
22667 Bristol Systems, Inc. 27,323.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
22668 Brown 8 Caldwell 151,927.97 Engineering Services P11-37
22669 Carollo Engineers 61.728.14 Engineering Services-P1 43,P2-50,J-25-4.J-34-1 8 J-59
22670 ClarkUft of Los Angeles 40,515.08 Shelving for New Warehouse
22671 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 38.480.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants&Y2K
22872 Converse Consultants 31,275.69 Consulting Services-Huntington State Beach Investigation
22673 Duke Energy Trading 8 Marketing,L.L.C. 94,832.40 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
22674 James Martin 8 Co. 44,557.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO 5127/98
22675 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 79,846.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95
22676 Olsson Construction,Inc. 44,013.00 Construction 11.27 8 Grading at Plant 2 Warehouse
22677 Orange County Water District 189,311.05 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
22678 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 233,994.96 Engineering Services J-42
22679 Polydyne, Inc. 30,295.25 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22680 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 126,289.00 Construction-Huntington Beach Investigation 8 Cleaning 84'Siphon
r
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011/99 to 10/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22681 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 32,791.67 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
22682 Siemens Technology 39,982.50 Air Conditioner Automation System
22683 South Coast Environmental Co. 45,903.00 Plant 2 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
22684 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 28,600.00 Weed Abatement Service
22685 Tule Ranch/Magen Forms 33,158.25 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
22686 Barnard Construction Company,Inc. 586.980.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R
22687 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 399,438.21 Construction 3.38.1
22688 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 103,401.00 Construction 2-34R
22689 Union Bank of California 44,382.01 Construction 3.38.1
22690 Union Bank of California 104,233.60 Construction 3.35
22691 Action Door Repair Corporation 191.29 Door Repairs
22682 Great American Printing Co. 282.40 Office Supplies
22693 American Airlines 8,564.36 Travel Services
22694 American Sigma, Inc. 3,396.06 Instrument Pads&Supplies
22695 Angel Scientific Products 492.38 Lab Supplies
22696 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22897 Applied Industrial Technology 84.72 Electrical Pads&Supplies
22698 Arous Data Security 117.50 OBslte Back-Up Tape Storage
22699 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 137.95 Publication
22700 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
22701 Awards&Trophies By Bea 40.14 Plaques
22702 AMSA 1,340.00 Registration
22703 AMSA 18,150.00 Membership
22704 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 45.14 Telephone Service
22705 AT&T Wireless Services 759.59 Cellular Telephone Service
22706 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
22707 Baltimore C/O K.H.Watts Co. 261.84 Electrical Supplies
22708 Banctec Inc. 1,050.08 Computer Maint.
22709 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 21.055.31 Telephone Installation
22710 Battery Specialties 441,95 Batteries
22711 Benn&Associates 1,205.00 Legal Service-541-1
22712 BloMerieux Vitek, Inc. 2.534.33 Lab Supplies
22713 Bird-B-Gone 267.63 Control Netting for Atrium in Admin. Bldg.
22714 Bolas Radiator Service 186.00 Truck Repairs
22715 Boutwell&Ennor,L.L.P. 1,000.00 Legal Services-401a Plan
22716 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 CAFR Report FY 98-99
22717 Southern California Marine Institute 10,528.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
22718 CsICOFI 150.00 Registration
22719 Cud R.Nelson,P.E. 980.00 Engineering Consultant 2.41
22720 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 681.08 Office Furniture
22721 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2.089.91 Instrument Parts
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22722 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,NA. 8,162.75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
22723 City of Garden Grove 2,270.00 Inspection Fee 3-35R
22724 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 427.22 Lab Supplies
22725 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 1.743.60 Electrical Supplies
22726 Continental Laboratory Products,Inc. 3,250.80 Lab Supplies
22727 Continental Network Services 3.533.44 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
22728 Cooper Energy Services 11,713.82 Engine Supplies
22729 Corporate Express Imaging 5.737.69 Misc.Computer Supplies
22730 Corporate Express 7,046.32 Office Supplies
22731 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 221.78 Mechanical Parts 5 Supplies
22732 Auditor Controller Collections 33.00 Permit Fees
22733 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,897.09 Electrical Supplies
22734 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
22736 CH2MHill 6,074.42 Engineering Services-J-31-4
22736 Confidential Mgt. Services, Inc. 1,541.85 Investigation Service
22737 CMTA-California Municipal Treasures Assoc. 450.00 Seminar Registration
22738 1999 CWEA SRTSC 360.00 Registration
22739 Del Mar Analytical 1.800.00 Biosolids Analysis
22740 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 19.718.24 10 Dell Computers
22741 Diamond H Recognition 437.88 Employee Service Awards
22742 Dlonex Corporation 1,642.12 Lab Supplies
22743 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 16.100.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98
22744 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 552.07 Paint Supplies
22745 DOB Engineering, Inc. 18,259.00 Temporary Employment Services
22746 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,804.65 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
22747 Eberhard Equipment 135.15 Tractor Repair
22748 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 145.00 Medical Screening
22749 Electre-Bond 5.602.27 Pump Supplies
22750 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 3,050.00 Safety Training
22751 Enchanter, Inc. 4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22752 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 12,606.99 Professional Services J-404
22753 Faxpress, Inc. 2,591.44 Office Supplies
22764 FedEx Corporation 24.36 Air Freight
22755 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 119.39 Plumbing Supplies
22756 Fibertron 298.15 Fiber Optic Cable
22757 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 880.33 Lab Supplies
22758 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering,Inc. 20.680.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
22759 Fountain Valley Camera 51 A7 Photo Supplies
22760 Future Electronics 55.76 Electrical Supplies
22761 Ganahl Lumber Company 2.272.51 Lumber/Hardware
22762 Garlock Gaskets-Technologies 2000 50.00 Registration
Page 4 of 9 -
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22763 Ganatt-Callahan Company 2,080.11 Chemicals
22764 Garvey Resources,Inc. 1,975.50 Legal Service-Kern County Ordinance
22765 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,425.12 Fiberglass Repair
22766 GTE California 1.949.05 Telephone Services
22767 Genium Publishing Corp. 20.85 Publication
22768 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 7.282.39 Belt,Filter Press Supplies
22769 Government Finance Officers Association 55.00 Subscnpfion
22770 WW Grainger,Inc. 4.552.11 Compressor Supplies
22771 Graphic Distributors 678.83 Photographic Supplies
22772 Graseby S.T.I. 7,479.10 Engine Supplies
22773 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2.436.72 Fiberglass Grating
22774 Graybar Electric Company 2,496.89 Electrical Supplies
22775 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 64.00 Janitorial Supplies
22776 GST, Inc./Micro City 23.06 Office Supplies
22777 Haaker Equipment Company 1.772.73 Truck Supplies
22778 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 15,476.82 Truk Supplies
22779 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 37AD Catering Services
22780 Hilti, Inc. 352.73 Tools
22781 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 668.55 Compressor Parts
22782 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 8,788.95 Engineering Services 2<7
22783 Home Depot 189.36 Small Hardware
22784 Hopkins Technical Products 721.80 Pump Supplies
22785 Horizon Technology 2.004.88 Lab Supplies
22786 Hub Auto Supply 593.39 Truck Parts
22787 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 1,140.35 Pump Supplies
22788 Imaging Plus,Inc. 7.25 Office Supplies
22789 Independent Rigging 120.00 Lab Supplies
22790 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental
22791 Stateflet 200.00 Online Service
22792 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 278.00 Lab Supplies
22793 Internet Corporation 327.45 Computer Supplies
22794 Interstate Battery Systems 459.02 Batteries
22795 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.99 Photographic Services
22796 IBM Corporation 1,475.55 IBM ASI400 Upgrade
22797 J&B Auto Parts 222.57 Auto Parts&Supplies
22795 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 4,009.80 Instrument Supplies
22799 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 510.00 Training Registration
22800 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 5,954.50 Misc.Construction Services
22801 Jay's Catering 160.65 Catering Services
22802 Johnstone Supply 329.87 Electrical Supplies
22803 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 13,125.00 Engineering Services 2-41
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22804 KP. Lindstrom, Inc. 6,016.95 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
22805 Kelly Paper 55.92 Paper
22806 Industrial Distribution Group 1,509.29 Tools
22807 Kris Kaligian 275.00 Contractual Services-Writing
22808 Lab Support 9,920.38 Temporary Employment Services
22809 LaserAll Corp. 724.10 Printer Service Agreement
22810 La Motte Chemical Products 575.46 Sulfide Test Kit
22811 Lexis-Nexis 343.75 Books&Publications
22812 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.88 Welding Supplies
22813 MarVac Electronics 141.79 Instrument Supplies
22814 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1.520.58 Plumbing Supplies
22815 Mellon Trust 15,405.83 Investment Custodian Bank
22816 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.373.00 Mechanical Repairs
22817 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 6,572.62 Tools&Supplies
22818 Mission Uniform Service 3.380.33 Uniform Rentals
22819 Mitchell Instrument Co. 167.00 Instruments
22820 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 8,964.37 Engineering Service 5411-1
22821 Moreland&Associates 5,564.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
22822 Morton Salt 788.80 Salt
22823 MoloPhoto 69.57 Photographic Services
22824 Museum Shops 91.68 Publication
22825 MS Abrasive Cleaning Equipment,Inc. 226.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22826 Nat West Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
22827 National Plant Services, Inc. 11,587.50 Vacuum Truck Services
22828 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 6,035.00 Training Registration
22829 Neal Supply Co. 151.60 Plumbing Supplies
22830 Network Generations,Inc. 19.890.65 Computer Supplies
22831 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1.192.00 Training Registration-Computer
22832 Newark Electronics 651.72 Instrument Supplies
22833 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,592.44 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
22834 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 17.498.80 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
22835 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,427.46 Office Supplies
22836 Orange County Vector Control District 215.08 Pest Control
22837 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 515.25 Electrical Supplies
22838 Orange Courier 87.30 Courier Services
22839 Oxygen Service Company 1,203.89 Specialty Gases
22840 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 81.46 Electrical Supplies
22841 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
22842 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4.069.50 Plumbing Supplies
22843 Pacific Southwest Group 6,503.48 Professional Service-Beach Closure
228" Pagenet 1,547.19 Rental Equipment
Page 6 of 9 -
< t
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22845 Parts Unlimited 771.34 Truck Supplies
22846 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 304.40 Filters
22847 Pinkerton Systems Integration 13,360.82 Security Card Reader System
22848 Pitney Bowes 353.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
22849 Cambridge Integrated Service 2.083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
22850 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 7,007.84 Temporary Employment Services
22851 Projects Partners 16,488.00 Temporary Employment Services
22852 PCS Express 20.00 Courier Service
22853 PFT/Alexander Service, Inc. 381.35 Instrument Supplies
22854 PRIMA-Public Risk Management Assoc. 255.00 Membership
22855 Quickstart Technologies 1,700.00 Training Registration
22856 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 199.08 Instrument Supplies
22867 Restek Corp 2,820.79 Lab Supplies
22858 Right Click Software 59.95 Publication
22859 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 8.005.56 Pump Supplies
22860 RPM Electric Motors 1.127.74 Electric Motor Repair
22861 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 457.69 Paint Supplies
22862 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 268.00 Mechanical Supplies
22863 Schwing America, Inc. 4,787.21 Pump Supplies
22864 City of Seal Beach 297.14 Water Use
22885 Second-Sun 30.56 Light Fixtures
22866 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,374.47 Tools/Hardware
22867 Sierra Automated Valve Services, Inc. 808.00 Electrical Maint.
22868 Sigma Chemical Co. 1,652.02 Lab Supplies
22869 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,510.37 Natural Gas
22870 SollChoice 1,014.67 Software
22871 Sonic Systems, Inc. 1,629.75 Computer Supplies
22872 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,241.60 Emission Fees
22873 Spectrum Geophysics 9,720.00 Professional Service-Ground Radar Study
22874 Standard&P000s 2,500.00 Analytical Services
22875 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 1,297.38 Pump Supplies
22876 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service
22877 State Board of Equalization 766.47 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee
22878 Sterling Art 174.12 Art Supplies
22879 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals
22880 Summit Steel 228.22 Metal
22881 Sunset Ford 74.78 Truck Supplies
22882 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
22883 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 445.11 Electric Cart Parts
22884 The Memwood Corporation 7,416.82 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
22885 The Orange County Register 1,530.90 Notices 8 Ads
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 1011199 to 10/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22886 Finnigan-A ThennoGuest Subsidiary 76.67 Lab Supplies
22887 Thomas Bros. Maps 1,198.15 Printing
22888 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 150.97 Mechanical Supplies
22889 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
22890 Tom Dickey 317.00 Travel Expense Reimb.
22891 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 355.65 Locks&Keys
22892 Toshiba International Corporation 2,328.89 Electrical Supplies
22893 Traffic Control Service,Inc. 14.55 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
22894 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 336.00 Lab Services
22895 TCH Associates,Inc. 4,139.55 Lab Supplies
22896 Teksystems 5,875.00 Temporary Employment Services
22897 United Parcel Service 31.31 Parcel Services
22898 V&A Consulting Engineers 6,373.51 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
22899 Valcom 57.88 Software
22900 Valley Cities Supply Company 625.62 Plumbing Supplies
22901 Valley Splicing Co. 500.00 Equipment Repair
22902 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 23.726.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
22903 Varian Chromatography Systems 2.363.93 Equipment Maint.
22904 Verne's Plumbing 12,040.00 Plumbing Supplies
22905 Village Nurseries 53.47 Landscaping Supplies
22906 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 17,922.85 Lab Supplies
22907 The Wackenhut Corporation 15.264.26 Security Guards
22908 Waters Corporation 1.354.84 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment
22909 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 64.77 Electrical Supplies
22910 Western States Chemical, Inc. 22.120.20 Caustic Soda MO B-23-95
22911 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 7,375.06 Instrument Supplies
22912 Worldview Travel 376.00 Travel Service
22913 Xerox Corporation 8,243.52 Copier Leases
22914 Advanoo Constructors, Inc. 16,361.00 Construction 641-1
22915 Advanoo Constructors,Inc. 16,498.00 Construction 541-1
22916 CNA Trust 3.540.00 Construction 541-1
22917 First Fire Systems, Inc. 174.20 Construction Contract J-57
22918 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 12,028.00 Construction 7-28
22919 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 1,975.59 Engineering Services 240
22920 Gary L.Aguirre 164.34 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimb.
22921 Stephen J.Surrill 314.86 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb.
22922 Deon M.Carrico 248.12 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb.
22923 Arnold G.Chavez 30.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22924 James E.Colston 317.94 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb.
22925 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr. 261.80 Meetingri mining Expense Reimb.
22926 Darrell S. Ennis 208.34 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimb.
Page 8 of �' -
Claims Paid From 10/1/99 to 10115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22927 Timothy D.Foley 243.46 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22928 Tom E. Gaworski 211.23 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb.
22929 John G. Gonzalez 222.76 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22930 Ingrid G. Hellebmnd 502.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22931 Roy Perrino 182.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22932 Brian K.Reed 340.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22933 Michael Reideler 257.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22934 George L. Robertson 804.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22935 Mary S.Thompson 247.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22936 Jane H.Tran 201.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22937 Joseph F.Vallone 211.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22938 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,935.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22939 Orange County Sanitation District 1,164.28 Petry Cash Reimb.
22940 James L.Wybenga 204.35 Meeling/Traming Expense Reimb.
22941 IBM Corp. 8.075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease
22942 Pinnacle One 17.375.00 Legal Service 11-17-1
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.288.367.54
Payroll Disbursements
15817-15941 Employee Paychecks $ 164.833.31 Biweekly Payroll 10/6199
15942-15943 Employee Paychecks 16,377.04 Termination&Adjustment
42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 687.979.21 Biweekly Payroll 1016/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 849.189.56
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,689.01 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 204.256.17 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
State Street Bank 8 Trust Co. of Ca. 174,780.58 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 528.725.76
Total Claims Paid 1011/99-10/15/99 $ 5,668,282.86
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 10116/99 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22943 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. $ 36,157.02 Consulting Services-FIS Support
22944 Orange County Sanitation District 425,933.06 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22945 Southern California Edison 48,150.52 Power
22946 Allied Management Resources, Inc. 750.00 Legal Service-Burge Claim
22947 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 144.60 Mechanical Supplies
22948 American Express 4,659.16 Purchasing Card Program
22949 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.28 Telephone Service
22950 Bell Pipe& Supply Co. 450.14 Valve Supplies
22951 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22952 Cad Warren&Co. 1,023.02 Insurance Claims Administrator
22953 Chinh Do 1,203.77 Vehicle Damage Claim
22954 Court Order 581.00 Wage Gamishment
22955 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 336.87 Plumbing Supplies
22956 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22957 Court Order 766.50 Wage Garnishment
22958 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 8,465.17 Plumbing Supplies
22959 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
22960 GTE California 5,262.55 Telephone Services
22961 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,116.18 Dues Deduction
22962 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use
22963 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 207.84 Safety Supplies
22964 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 6,932.00 Misc.Construction Services
22965 Maintenance Technology Corp. 940.23 Welding Supplies
22966 MarVac Electronics 201.45 Instrument Supplies
22967 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 38.25 Tools
22968 Mission Uniform Service 128.96 Uniform Rentals
22969 Motion Industries 53.09 Pump Supplies
22970 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22971 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22972 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 547.14 Electrical Supplies
22973 OCFA 629.14 Dues Deduction
22974 Pacific Bell 62.69 Telephone Services
22975 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22976 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22977 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
22978 Scott, Reilly&Whitehead 46.25 Legal Services-Human Resources Issues
22979 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 53.93 Tools
22980 Sharp Claim Services 85.00 Appraisal Service
22981 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 61.92 Tools/Hardware
Page 1 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16199 to 1O131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22982 Snap On Industdal 3,139.65 Hardware
22983 So.Cal.Gas Company 13,403.57 Natural Gas
22984 State of California 133.35 Wage Garnishment
22985 StudioVisia 19,360.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint.
22986 Summit Steel 270.9E Metal
22987 Tomell&Cotten 854.80 Legal Service-Burge Claim
22988 The Unisource Corporation 7,024.60 Office Supplies
22989 United Way 307.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22990 Gerardo Amezcua 372.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22991 Blake Anderson 531.89 Meetingriraining Expense Reimb.
22992 Catherine M. Biele 307.08 Meetingrlraining Expense Reimb.
22993 David P.Halverson 1.005.18 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
22994 Thomas A.Hunt 334.54 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
22995 William F.Webster,Jr. 997.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22996 Aerochem, Inc. 1,941.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
22997 Air Industries Corporation 7,784.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
229M Voided Check - -
22999 Anaheim General Hospital 993.39 Rewnclllation User Fee Refund
23000 Burlington Engineering, Inc. 971.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23001 Chapman Hospital 154.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23002 Chrome Technology, Inc. 435.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23003 Huntington Beach Medical Center 1,504.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23004 Continuous Coating 1,904.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23005 Coming OCA Corp. 1,076.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23006 Disc Manufacturing, Inc. 911.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23007 Electrorack Products Co., Inc. 857.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23008 Fullerton Foods/Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. 1.471.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23009 La Habra Plating 174.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23010 La Palma Intercommunity,Hospital 995.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23011 Laundedand 53.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23012 M.S. Bellows 213.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23013 Miuometals, Inc.#2 1,235.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23014 Monarch Precision Debuning Co. 1.144.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23015 Orange Container 2,933.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23016 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 3.865.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23017 Pentadyne/PentaBex, Inc. 537.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23018 Pilkington Aerospace 20,400.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23019 Pure Chem Products Co. 158.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23020 Rainbow Disposal Co, Inc. 646.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23021 Ricoh Electronics#2 2,614.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 2 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23022 RBC Transport Dynamics 169.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23023 South Bay Chrome Sales 583.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23024 St Jude Medical Center 8,512.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23025 Sunclipse, Inc. 5,017.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23026 T&P Plating Corporation 152.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23027 Taormina Industries, Inc.#4 685.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23028 United Custom Polishing&Plating 637.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23029 Universal Circuits,Inc. 1,871.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23030 Val Circuits#5 165.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23031 Y K K(USA), Inc. 1,628.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23032 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,190.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
23033 Orange County Sanitation District 18,394.78 Worker's Comp. Reimb.
23034 Robert C.Thompson 1,185.71 MeetingrTraining Expense Relmb.
23035 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 33,365.00 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
23036 Blue Cross of California 176,053.12 Medical Insurance Premium
23037 Boyle Engineering Corporation 38,682.56 Engineering Services Pl41 &7-27
23038 Bristol Systems, Inc. 30,060.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
23039 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 90,418.46 26 Computers,5 Printers,4 Monitors& 1 Server
23040 Delta Dental 41,647.47 Dental Insurance Plan
23041 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 103,601.05 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
23042 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,858.10 Medical Insurance Premium
23043 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 108,310.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
230" Orange County Water District 58,103.94 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
23045 OCB Reprographics 27,660.43 Printing Service-Spec P-173
23046 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 29,204.45 Electrical Supplies
23047 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 133,843.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23048 Polydyne, Inc. 30,982.50 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11.92
23049 Realtime Systems Corporation 79,070.00 Software Maint. Service
23050 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 220,274.70 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
23051 SPEC Services, Inc. 127,848.62 Engineering Services J-33.1
23052 Tran Consulting Engineers 60,000.00 Consulting Services-Misc. Small Capital Projects
23053 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 33,458.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
23054 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 61,565.33 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
23055 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 73,899.28 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
23056 Ark Construction Company 47,460.98 Construction Pl444
23067 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 73,368.20 Construction P2-65
23050 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 35,845.09 Construction 3.38-3.2-R-97
23059 S.S. Mechanical Corporation 112,443.27 Construction P146-2
23060 Southern Contracting Company 156,708.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
23061 Academic Press 7.76 Publication
Page 3 of 10 �'
G '
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23052 Aearo Company 137.00 Safety Supplies
23063 Air Products&Chemicals 23,458.33 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
23064 Airborne Express 47.50 Air Freight
23065 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies
23066 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 7.344.24 Manhole Frames&Covers
23067 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 19,162.40 Dispute Analysis&Report
[3068 Analysts, Inc. 2,145.84 Testing Kits
23069 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
23070 Appleone Employment Service 15,130.88 Temporary Employment Services
23071 Applied Industrial Technology 1,451.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies
23072 Arcus Data Security 106.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage
23073 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,040.00 Vacuum Truck Services
23074 Art's Disposal Service, Inc. 588.36 Waste Removal
23075 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement
23076 Awards&Trophies By Bea 197.94 Plaques
23077 American Air Filter International 1.386.62 Filter
23078 AMP Incorporated 2,085.00 Registration
23079 AMSA 335.00 Registration
23080 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 372.65 Telephone Service
23081 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 10.75 Telephone Service
23082 Battery Specialties 991.21 Batteries
23083 Bauer Compressors 2e1.74 Safety Supplies
23084 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 648.10 Office Supplies
23085 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 58.99 Publication
23086 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,128.00 Surveying Services MO a-25-97
23087 Cal-Glass,Inc. 134.69 Lab Equipment Service
23088 California Automatic Gate 270.56 Service Agreement
23089 Calpelra 890.00 Registration
23090 CalCoast-City of Huntington Beach 1.000.00 Coastal Symposium Membership
23091 Career Track 387.00 Registration
23092 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 17.75 Courier Service
23093 Century Paint 207.74 Paint Supplies
23094 Charles P.Crowley Co. 704.73 Instrument Parts
23095 Cheyenne Livestock&Products, Inc. 2.875.00 Storage Cabinets
23096 City Office Furniture, Inc. 386.77 Office Supplies
23097 ClarkLift of Los Angeles 3,695.50 Pallet Racks
23098 Clean Air Report 1,865.00 Subscription
23099 Commercial Door Company, Inc. 3.378.00 Roof Hatch
23100 Connell GM Parts 520.05 Truck Supplies
Pnne 4 of in
Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23101 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 5,093.48 Electrical Supplies
23102 Consolidated Plastics Company 122.22 Lab Supplies
23103 Continental Network Services 8,033.42 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
23104 Converse Consultants 5,227.18 Consulting Services-Huntington State Beach Investigation
23105 Cooper Energy Services 2,010.02 Engine Supplies
23106 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease
23107 Corporate Express 1,77023 Office Supplies
23108 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09
23109 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 5.749.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
23110 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 19,888.99 SARI Line Protection Reimb.
23111 County of Orange 70.00 Permit Fees
23112 County Wholesale Electric Co. 182.16 Electrical Supplies
23113 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 300.00 Conference Registration
23114 CR 8 R. Inc. 3,192.00 Container Rentals
23115 CWEA Membership 205.00 Membership
23116 David's Tree Service 14,710.00 Tree Maint. Service
23117 Del Mar Analytical 536.00 Biosolids Analysis
23118 Drexelbrook cto Patten Corporation 4.161.76 Instrument Supplies
23119 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 19.61 Paint Supplies
23120 DMG-Maximus 15,170.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
23121 JWC Environmental 5,860.66 Mechanical Maint. Service
23122 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 157.00 Medical Screening
23123 Eldridge Products 1.444.73 Instrument Maint. Service
23124 Elsevier Science 882.00 Publication
23125 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
23126 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies
23127 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 3,871.02 Software License
23128 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,153.67 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
23129 Environmental Professionals Organization 39.00 Registration
23130 Faxpress, Inc. 1,431.24 Office Supplies
23131 FedEx Corporation 429.56 Air Freight
23132 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 359.57 Plumbing Supplies
23133 Fibertron 1,841.97 Fiber Optic Cable
23134 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
23135 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,200.75 Lab Supplies
23136 Flo-Systems, Inc. 10,880.28 Pump Supplies
23137 Foothill Engineering 8 Dewatering, Inc. 20.240.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
23138 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,071.56 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium
23139 Fountain Valley Camera 75.34 Photo Supplies
23140 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 455.50 Truck Wash Tickets
Page 5 of 10
4 ,
Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23141 Fox Bay Industries 91.70 Office Supplies
23142 Fry's Electronics 990.41 Computer Supplies
23143 Ganahl Lumber Company 16.86 Lumber/Hardware
23W Garra9-Callahan Company 5,379.96 Chemicals
23145 GTE California 610.15 Telephone Services
23146 Gednge Castle 487.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
23147 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,644.74 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
23148 WW Grainger,Inc. 194.98 Compressor Supplies
23149 Graphic Distributors 270.50 Photographic Supplies
23150 Graseby S.T.I. 820.75 Engine Supplies
23151 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 637.23 Janitorial Supplies
23152 Haaker Equipment Company 3,555.97 Truck Supplies
23153 Hach Company 158.77 Lab Supplies
23154 Harcourt Brace 8 Co.and Subsidiaries 68.60 Publication
23155 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples
23156 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 72.62 Plumbing Supplies
23157 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8.Deli 114.30 Catering Services
23158 Hlld, Inc. 550.31 Tools
23159 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 3,448.17 Compressor Parts
23160 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium
23161 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 18.379.66 Engineering Services 241
23162 Home Depot 710.19 Small Hardware
23163 Hopkins Technical Products 87.12 Pump Supplies
23164 Hub Auto Supply 32.08 Truck Parts
23165 City of Huntington Beach 12,503.19 Water Use
23166 Imaging Plus,Inc. 116.50 Office Supplies
23167 Impulse 382.88 Lab Supplies
23168 Intennec Corporation 10,111.07 Computer Supplies
23169 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.71 Photographic Services
23170 Irvine Ranch Water District 23.28 Water Use
23171 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 18,402.76 Safety Supplies
23172 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 31.45 Training Expenses
23173 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 21,913.97 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
23174 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 10,398.00 Misc.Construction Services
23175 Jay's Catering 796.53 Catering Services
23176 Johnstone Supply 2,130.84 Electrical Supplies
23177 Jordan Controls 320.62 Annual Membership Renewal
23178 Kelly Paper 281.19 Paper
23179 Industrial Distribution Group 4,326.24 Tools
23180 Lab Support 11,107.02 Temporary Employment Services
Page 6 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/16/99 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23181 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 260.63 Galvanize Beams
23182 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2.519.21 Mechanical Supplies
23183 Maintenance Technology Corp. 339.07 Welding Supplies
23184 MarVac Electronics 97.06 Instrument Supplies
23186 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 702.10 Tools
23186 Mm Analytical System 2,075.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing
23187 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 2,000.00 Software Maint.Agreement
23188 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,673.45 Mechanical Repairs
23189 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 439.01 Tools&Supplies
23190 Mission Uniform Service 3.317.72 Uniform Rentals
23191 Mitchell instrument Co. 1,426-00 Instruments
23192 MotoPhoto 73.92 Photographic Services
23193 National Audio-Visual Supply 79.87 Office Supplies
23194 National Institute of Stds&Technology 735.00 Lab Supplies
23195 National Microcomp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
23196 National Plant Services, Inc 1,587.50 Vacuum Truck Services
23197 Neal Supply Co. 20.20 Plumbing Supplies
23198 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 8,344.00 Training Registration-Computer
23199 City of Newport Beach 109.48 Water Use
23200 Nicholas Chevrolet 13.95 Truck Repairs
23201 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 7.054.40 LubricanVDiesel Fuel
23202 The Norco Companies 282.40 Mail Delivery Service
23203 NAS Associates, Inc. 1,493.25 Lab Services
23204 NovaTech Lighting Systems 1.159.80 Electrical Supplies
23205 Netsol 860.80 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade
23206 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,592.22 Office Supplies
23207 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 64.41 Plumbing Supplies
23208 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.66 Electrical Supplies
23209 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Service Agreement
23210 Oxygen Service Company 2,050.86 Specialty Gases
23211 Pacific Bell 1.078.46 Telephone Services
23212 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5.933.18 Plumbing Supplies
23213 Parts Unlimited 52.06 Truck Supplies
23214 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 5,252.17 Filters
23215 Port Supply 37.71 Rope
23216 Powerware 170.41 Publication
23217 Cambndge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin.
23218 Primary Source 25025 Office Furniture
23219 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 6,607.28 Temporary Employment Services
23220 Professional Procurement Seminars 4,770.00 Training Registration
Page 7 of 10
Claims Paid From 10/116/99 to 10131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23221 Projects Partners 17,846.67 Temporary Employment Services
23222 DOS, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
23223 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
23224 R.T.Corporation 256.00 Lab Supplies
23225 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
23226 Ramco Specialty Products 823.79 Chemical
23227 Red Wing Shoes 118.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
23228 Reliastar 7.760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
23229 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,567.36 Life Insurance Premium
23230 Rosen Electrical 2,265.12 Electrical Supplies
23231 Roto Rooter-S.O.C.#51 1.354.66 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. State Beach Sewer Lines
23232 Royce Instrument Corporation 5,029.08 Instrument Supplies
23233 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,875.00 Engineering Services-Crane Safety
23234 RSA Sutter Soil Products 612.83 Soil Materials
23235 Safety-Kleen 561.29 Service Agreement
23236 Santa Ana Electric Motors 674.52 Motor Repair
23237 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 325.03 Mechanical Supplies
23238 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 725.39 Specialty Gases
23239 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 563.60 Lab Repairs
23240 Sears Industrial Sales 922.46 Mechanical Supplies
23241 Second-Sun 193.37 Light Fixtures
23242 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 343.36 Tools/Hardware
23243 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
23244 Sievers Instruments 1.491.55 Lab Supplies
23245 Supelco, Inc. 440.00 Lab Supplies
23246 So. Cal.Gas Company 602.97 Natural Gas
23247 SoftView Computer Products 208.50 Computer Supplies
23248 Southern California Edison Company 160.00 Publication
23249 Southwest Scientific Inc. 1.535.06 Instrument Supplies
23250 Sparkletts 2.016.72 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
23251 Specialty Technical Publishers, Inc. 280.75 Publication
23252 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 332.30 Lab Supplies
23253 State Water Resources Control Board 10.000.00 Annual NPDES Permit Fee
23254 Summit Steel 176.40 Metal
23255 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
23256 Sunset Industrial Parts 838.79 Mechanical Supplies
23257 Solar Turbines, Inc. 1,288.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
23258 SWRCB Accounting Office 400.00 Annual Fee
23259 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 82.21 Electric Cart Parts
23260 Teamwork!Corporate Programs 122.27 Tools
Page 8 of 10
Claims Paid From 10116M to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23261 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 64.13 Publication
23262 Tekmar-Dohrman 1.733.59 Lab Supplies
23263 Thermo Optek Corporation 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Service Agreement
23264 Thomas Bros.Maps 390.49 Printing
23265 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.573.62 Mechanical Supplies
23266 Thyssen Dover Elevator 1,439.10 Elevator Maintenance
23267 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 94.00 Locks 8 Keys
23268 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 456.99 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
23269 The Trans Company 2.830.00 Electrical Equipment Maint. Service
23270 Transcat 5,401.01 Electrical Supplies
23271 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 10,277.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
23272 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 150.80 Truck Supplies
23273 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 80.00 Lab Services
23274 Two Wheels One Planet 286.43 Bicycle Supplies
23275 TDI-Brooks International 4,550.00 Lab Supplies
23276 Teksystems 7,362.50 Temporary Employment Services
23277 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 2,455.00 Equipment Certification
23278 Ultra Scientific 341.66 Lab Supplies
23279 United Parcel Service 715.16 Parcel Services
23280 Unocal 76 65.16 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1
23281 Valley Cities Supply Company 602.62 Plumbing Supplies
232a2 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 22,267.00 Consulting Services-Software Configuration Management
23283 Veme's Plumbing 200.00 Plumbing Supplies
23264 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.373.18 Vision Service Premium
23285 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,420.71 Lab Supplies
23286 Waxie Sanitary Supply 826.80 Janitorial Supplies
23287 Western States Chemical, Inc. 8,573.18 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
23288 Xerox Corporation 11,529.00 Copier Leases
23289 Systems Integrated 10,291.88 Construction Services J-31-3
23290 Jeffrey Brown 975.98 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
23291 Pongsakdi Cady 786.06 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimb.
23292 Vladimir A. Kogan 978.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23293 Roland T. McReynolds 166.82 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb.
23294 Michael D. Moore 1,931.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23285 Adrian Renescu 1,236.57 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23296 Mahin Talebi 742.58 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb.
23297 Edward M.Tortes 1.162.89 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23298 Charles F.Wnsor 922.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23299 Moyasar T.Yahya 907.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
23300 Paula A.Zeller 456.13 Meeling/Training Expense Reimb.
Page 9 of 10
Claims Paid From 10116199 to 10/31/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
23301 Alum-A-Therm 1,186.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
23302 Orange County Sanitation District 903.54 Petty Cash Reimb.
23303 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership
23304 County of Orange 850.00 Permit Fee
23305 County of Orange 38.00 Permit Fee
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,416,262.43
Payroll Disbursements
15944. 16091 Employee Paychecks $ 174,043.45 Biweekly Payroll 10120/99
16092-16092 Employee Paycheck 98.55 Adjustment
42148-42589 Direct Deposit Statements 673,061.99 Biweekly Payroll 10120199
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 847,203.99
Total Claims Paid 10/16199-10131199 $ 4,263,466.42
Page 10 of 10
BOARD OF DIRECTORS M°MingDa,° TRBE.orD,.
nmres
AGENDA REPORT "°"'"°'^"°' 1inNoin°°'
om
Orange County Sandalion Oisincl
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: DENIAL OF CLAIM OF MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive, file and deny claim of Mladen Buntich Construction Company dated October 11, 1999,
in the amount of$1,157,188.00 for alleged damages in connection with Improvements to Miller-
Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3.
SUMMARY
The subject claim was received by the District on October 14, 1999, and is related to the
construction of the Miller-Holder Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3. District staff has been
meeting with Mladen Buntich over the course of several months in an attempt to resolve the
matter. Please refer to the attached November 1, 1999, memo from General Counsel.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memo from General Counsel dated November 1, 1999
SK:Ic
'Rtlntl,.n 0•Y�`BYO Rry 11 I.14.1.
R.. Page 7
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, October 27, 1999
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, October 27, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Don McIntyre, General Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Pal McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Jim Silva, County Supervisor Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
John Collins, Past Chair of the Board Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Directors Absent: Mike Moore, ECM Manager
None Layne Baroldi, Environmental Regulatory
Specialist
OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Tom Nixon, Counsel
Don Hughes
Ryal Wheeler
Fred Cardenas
Dave Schlesinger
Augie Caires
Dan McMillan
Jan Goldby
Jim Howell
Ed winamer
Doug Isbell
John Lippitt
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2
October 27, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the September 22, 1999 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were
approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair Debay welcomed the members of the San Diego Wastewater Management District Advisory
Committee, who spent the day with staff and Directors Eckenrode and Swan to discuss our
administrative and management policies.
Several Directors attended the October 20 Peter Sandman seminar on public outrage, and Director
Swan recommended that Mr. Sandman return to address the League of Cities as well as employees
of IRWD and other agencies. He indicated that IRWD would help pay the costs.
Chair Debay also mentioned that there has been some talk about sewering dry weather flow from the
new development planned near Crystal Cove. So far no one has contacted the District.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
A. The General Manager reported that the November 3 OMTS Committee meeting has
been cancelled. And because of a conflict with a League of Cities meeting on
November 4, the PDC Committee will meet at 5 p.m. at Edison Field.
Next month's Steering Committee agenda will have several major policy issues to
discuss, including succession planning and rate consolidation. Several changes in
executive management personnel (Mike Peterman's early departure in December
rather than January, and Ed Hodges' departure on November 1) make a discussion of
the structure of the organization essential as well.
Director Silva said that he has had several meetings regarding the problems in
Huntington Beach and that the General Manager was in attendance representing the
Sanitation District. Director Silva thanked Mr. McIntyre for his positive approach in
working with the cities and agencies on this difficult issue.
B. Report of the Assistant Manager
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported on the Huntington Beach Closure
and Urban Flow Diversion activities. Staff is completing a long list of items and
preparing the final report for presentation to the Directors in November. The county
and cities have formed a group to look at upstream sources. The Huntington Beach
special discharge permit is on tonight's Board agenda. Researchers from UCI are
investigating the channel and marshes. NWRI has provided a matching grant of
$75,000 for these studies. A panel of experts is being formed to evaluation the event
and provide recommendations should it occur again. The outfall dye test was
completed and there were no leaks. Questions have arisen, however, on background
levels of the ocean and additional studies may be recommended.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
October 27, 1999
Dave Schlesinger indicated that San Diego has also experienced some beach closures
as a result of urban water runoff. The work done around Mission Bay, however, has
eliminated the problem in that area.
Director Silva said that he represents nine cities on the Board of Supervisors and they
have all discussed the major impacts of beach closures. They are developing an MOU
for funding studies and will be looking for help from other cities.
The Regional Board has sent letters to the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach,
Newport Beach, Seal Beach and Costa Mesa putting them on notice of the possibility
for violations if storm drain discharges are determined to be the source of
contamination.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D)
A. Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority Conflicting Committee Actions
Staff requested direction from the Steering Committee on how to proceed in the
event two of the working committees made differing/conflicting recommendations
on the same issue. The Steering Committee members agreed that both
recommendations should be presented to the Board in an agenda report and the
Board members would decide which recommendation to implement.
B. Land Purchase/Lease in Central Valley—Due Diligence Update
Bob Ghirelli and Layne Baroldi updated the members on the due diligence
activities since the last Steering Committee meeting. A list of deal points has
been developed. A formal recommendation will be presented to the Board at the
November meeting. It was decided that the OMTS Committee would meet jointly
with the FAHR Committee on Wednesday, November 10, to review the issues in
detail before presenting to the Board.
C. Membership of FAHR subcommittee re Refunds for Yorba Linda Properties
Served by Septic Tanks
The FAHR Committee recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee to
consider refunds for property owners currently on septic systems. However, the
members were identified. Chair Debay appointed Tom Saltarelli as chair of the
committee, Peer Swan and Lynn Daucher as members of this Ad Hoc Committee.
Staff and legal counsel will prepare a report outlining options to present to the
Committee.
General Counsel Tom Woodruff said that he has had discussions with County
legal staff on this matter and concern was expressed about the four-year statute
of limitations. Additional legal research is ongoing in order to determine whether
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4
October27, 1999
D. The Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in November were
not reviewed.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 4 p.m.
This meeting will begin one hour earlier to allow additional time for a 6 p.m. closed session discussion
with General Counsel and the full Board on the claim of litigation re Crow-Winthrop [pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)].
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for November 17, 1999 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened at 6:16 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code
Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the
Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2 and are
maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and
Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Items Nos. 13A(1),
12A(2), 13A(3) and 13A(4). The Committee did not consider Agenda Item No. 13A(5), and no
report was given.
At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 5
October 27, 1999
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:56 p.m.
Smitted by:b :
J Tappan
ring Committee Secretary
NYI.MWMMKSIEFMI.E COYY/rIEEIVThH11f0}NO3L YYMMt6i
w
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, November 4, 1999, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation
District was held on Thursday, November 4, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the Second Floor Conference
Room at Edison Field, Anaheim, California.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
John Collins, Past Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Jack Mauller Malt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Russell Patterson Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Christina Shea
Jan Debay, Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT:
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair
Shawn Boyd, Director
Directors Absent: John Cavanaugh, Woodruff, Spradlin &Smart
Dave Olson, Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart
None
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the October 7, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
PDC Committee Minutes a
Page 2
November 4, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode asked that staff prepare a report for a future PDC Committee
meeting regarding urban runoff and how to get other agencies involved. Director Boyd reported that
he has received a letter asking the same questions on the same issue, and he will be responding and
will give the Board a comprehensive view of the status. General Manager Don McIntyre reported that
at the last City Managers meeting a committee has been formed (he is a member of the committee)
to address this issue because four Orange County cities have received letters from the Regional
Board, putting them on notice re urban runoff. The County will be obligated to do more to monitor the
quality of the water being discharged into the storm drain system.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager McIntyre did not make a report.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Director of Engineering David Ludwin did not make a report.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item.
(11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d)
a. PDC 99-51 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Robert Bein, William
Frost&Associates for the Main Entrance Traffic and Roadway
Configuration Study at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19980029, for an
amount not to exceed $49,806.
Directors expressed concern about the numerous changes to the main
entrance in the past few years.
MOTION: Staff was directed to prepare a conceptual layout for the
Committee's review in December.
1
y PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
November 4, 1999
b. PDC 99-52 (1)Approve plans and specifications for Demolition of Warehouse and
Area Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP199990065; (2)Approve
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file
bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to West-
Tech Contracting for Demolition of Warehouse and Area
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. PS19990065, for an amount not
to exceed $49,200.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve.
c. PDC 99-53 Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer
Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
d. PDC 99.54 Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job
No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of
$57,764, for a total amount not to exceed $684,054.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened in closed session at 5:12 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in
accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in
the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable
action was taken re Agenda Items Nos. 12.1.a.
At 5:35 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
e
PDC Committee Minutes d
Page 4 l
November 4, 1999
(16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
December 2, 1999, at 5 p.m.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
Submitted by: /
J a appan
D Committee Secretary
N:Wp.dtaNpendaWDCTDC99%9MINS1110499 ndmdas.doc
PDC COMMITTEE raeennglr TO'Ed
11/9/99 33/I]/99
AGENDA REPORT Item NumM Item Number
iDL99-53 13(c)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator. Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF MILLER HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SIPHON,
CONTRACT NO. 3-2-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget for Replacement of Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract
No. 3-2-1, for a total budget of$1,997,500.
SUMMARY
The Miller Holder Trunk Sewer line and siphon was built in 1961. The sewer consists of a
69-inch pipe with a triple 30-inch barrel siphon under the East Garden Grove Wintersburg
Channel.
The County of Orange owns the right-of-way and prior rights for this flood control channel.
The County of Orange has completed plans to widen and deepen the East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel. This construction project requires that Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD) relocate their existing sewer siphon and structures to avoid any interference
with the construction of the new flood control channel-widening project.
The County of Orange will add OCSD construction plans to their bid package. The County
of Orange will administer both sets of plans in one construction contract.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The total budget for siphon replacement is
estimated at$ 1,997,500.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Revenue Area 3 has sufficient reserves.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
OCSD will hire a Consultant to pat hole, perform field survey work and design a new siphon
to replace and lower the existing siphon underneath the new flood control channel.
rypanNvmlMy.UhV�Ma`8 Ebwda ReNh\1BW Batl�peMa Rep6\11WM1en 1]�c)M
R..,,,.. vmse Page 1
It is anticipated that the design can be achieved as a task under the General Managers `
small project design authority not to exceed $50,000.00.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives for this sewer work. The District has the option of
providing no coordination between OCSD and the County of Orange for the proposed
project. By coordinating the OCSD project together with the County of Orange project,
there would be less inconvenience to the public and the combined cost of both projects
should be less.
CEQA FINDINGS
The County of Orange is handling the CEQA documentation for both projects.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
RLC:jak
G:WglobaMgenda Draft ReporlslPDCl 24 AR 11 U99.Eot
1YaJanVvylWp.ChgpsMa MIp R*p UMB-M I9..R.p 111E talc)O%
R. ermse Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
REPLACEMENT OF MILLER HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SIPHON
CONTRACT NO. 3-2-1
ORIGINAL`- CURRENT- .PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK`�� .AUTHORIZED PROJECT,- ".BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET" BUDGET-,' ",INCREASE 'BUDGET ` TO DATE ' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE 70 DA7E(%)
Project Development $ 2000 $ 2,000 $ 2.000 0%
Desi n Staff $ 65,000 $ 65.000 $ 65,000 0%
Ccnsultant PSA $ 49.500 $ 49.500 $ 49.500 0%
Construction Contract $ 1,230 000 $
Construction Other $ 10.000 $
Construction Staff $ 84,500 _ $
Reimbursement of 5%
for administration costs $ 187.500
Contingency $ 369,000 $ 0%
TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 1.997,500 $ - $ 116,500 $ 116,500 $ 0%
H1wa.dlalenBUOB5 a MNTMCTS 2-1412-1 Butleat Tablexis]Mcincts
PDC COMMITTEE Mee ng Date To ad,Of Dir.
11499 I1-17-99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PLIM 13ro)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer
SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALL,
JOB NO. J-39, ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo
Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing
for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,764, for a total amount
not to exceed $684,054.
SUMMARY
Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch
Outfall, Job No. J-39, recommended that a ballast survey program be
implemented to monitor the condition of the ballast. The ballast is the protective
blanket of rock that absorbs the force of large storm waves. The ballast
protecting the 120-inch outfall was placed during construction in the early 1970s.
It was recommended that the ballast be monitored every five years and, as
needed, following events impacting the ballast, such as severe storms or
earthquakes. Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the
120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, also recommended proceeding with physical
wave tank modeling tests.
Racal Pelagos, Inc., inspected and measured the ballast rock in 1996. Several
large storms occurred during the El Nino winter of 1997-98; therefore, in
December 1998, Racal Pelagos repeated the survey. The surveys indicated that
some of the ballast appears to have moved from its original position.
Carollo Engineers' project report indicated that a median rock size of 1000
pounds would be needed to protect the near shore zone protective rock cap
(Station 27+00 to 50+00). It is also recommended that a median rock size of 700
pounds would be needed on the off shore zone (Station 50+00 to 70+00). These
recommendations were based on analytical methods.
Physical wave tank testing was conducted at Oregon State University, in July
and August 1999 that indicated that the offshore zone protective rock cap
(Station 50+00 to 70+00) can be reduced from the initially planned modeling rock
a. uses Page 1
size of 700 pounds to a median rock size of 300 pounds. Results of testing
conducted in the near shore zone (Station 27+00 to 50+00) are inconclusive due
to placement of a false bottom in an effort to recreate actual conditions and
potential model scale effects. More detail is provided under the"Additional
Information" section of this report.
Proposed Addendum No. 6 is to perform additional wave tank testing to
determine the required ballast on the near shore zone. The additional testing is
needed to determine the extent of additional ballast that will be required and the
optimal rock size to provide continued long-term use of the 120-inch outfall.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with
the original PSA, subsequent addenda, and this pending Addendum No. 6.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: coRF-D1a.)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
In March 1996, Carollo Engineers entered into an agreement with the District to
provide engineering services needed for the investigation and repair work for
continued use and reliable performance of the District's 78-inch and 120-inch
ocean outfalls, Job. No. J-39.
The Scope of Work for the outfall investigation and repair work included:
1. A study and report that analyzes securing the end gate. The study includes
preparation of plans and specifications to secure the end gate.
2. Documentation of the amount of solids/grit accumulation in the outfall diffuser
and determination of the condition of the outfalls.
3. Preparation of detailed plans and specifications for cleaning of the outfall
based on interior inspection.
4. A hydraulic analysis for both outfalls to determine flow capacity.
5. General survey and repair work needed on both outfalls.
ate. 1� Page 2
Outfall surveys were conducted by Racal Pelagos, Inc. in 1996 and in 1998
(following the 1997-98 El Nino storms) as part of the J-39 studies to determine
the condition of the ballast. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast
appears to have moved from its original position. Natural shifting of the ballast
pile due to large storm waves during the 1980s and 1990s may have caused this
movement. Although some movement was observed, the ballast system did not
appear to be in danger of immediate failure.
Recent Work Efforts
Preliminary results from the analysis conducted in the February 1998 engineering
report indicate that almost one mile of the 120-inch outfall would benefit from
additional reinforcing ballast. Initial cost estimates to reinforce the outfall from
Station 27+00 to 70+00 (the 4300-foot stretch of outfall that experiences the most
intensive wave forces) approach $13,000,000. The analysis is considered a
theoretical starting point that needs to be verified by physical laboratory testing.
In July and August 1999, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech and Dr. Charles Sollitt of
Oregon State University(OSU) conducted wave tank testing, at the O.H.
Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon in order to test two
sections of the 120-inch outfall which are proposed for rerocking. The tests were
conducted to determine the degree of stability of proposed armor rock sizes for
the two sections of the outfall.
A great deal of planning and coordination went into preparing the model tests. In
an effort to save costs in the testing program, it was decided to represent the
shallow section between Stations 27+00 and 50+00 in the model by taking the
original section tested for the deeper section from Station 50+00 to 70+00 and
surrounding it with a four foot thick false bottom. This was done rather than
rebuilding the model with smaller sized rock, which would have added an
estimated five days to the program which would have increased the costs
correspondingly.
The testing conducted on the deeper section (Station 50+00 to 70+00) indicated
that the offshore zone protective rock cap (Station 50+00 to 70+00) can be
reduced from the initially planned modeling rock size of 700 pounds to a median
rock size of 300 pounds.
The results of the testing conducted on the shallow section are inconclusive.
This section (Station 27+00 to 50+00) experiences larger forces than the deeper
section. Staff expected more rock movement in this section for this reason.
However, as the testing proceeded little movement was observed.
1� Page 3
It was concluded that the false bottom resulted in bookends" for the model
section which made the model more resistant to wave attack than would be
realized in actuality by the 120-inch outfall.
Additional Work Effort Recommended—Addendum No. 6
Staff recommends proceeding with additional wave tank testing so the work can
be completed by February 2000. The results of the testing conducted in July and
August of 1999 have demonstrated a significant savings in costs to rerock the
deeper sections (Station 50+00 to 70+00). Staff believes that additional testing
conducted on the near shore zone (Station 27+00 to 50+00) will provide
additional savings in costs to rerock this section of the ouffall that experiences
some of the largest forces due to wave action.
Carollo Engineers and their subconsultant, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech, have
worked with OSU to establish a program and schedule for additional wave tank
testing at their Corvallis, Oregon location test facility.
Carollo Engineers proposes to provide the services of Dr. Fred Raichlen again
for the planning, coordination, observations, and results evaluation of the wave
tank ballast testing at OSU. Carollo Engineers will also provide the services of
Dr. Charles Sollitt his staff, and the use of the testing facilities at OSU.
Based on the results of the additional wave tank testing, Carollo Engineers will
survey existing local rock quarries to factor in an optimum gradation solution.
Carollo Engineers will also review the results of the 1998 ballast cross section
inspection, prior to submitting the final report, which will indicate the most
effective and economical protection for the outfall.
Basis of Recommendation
1. The analysis provided in the February 1998 engineering report suggests that
almost one mile of the outfall needs to be reinforced with larger sized rocks.
Actual physical tests will refine the appropriate size of the work required and
identify the reach of outfall that needs the support. The final refined estimate
may be reduced approximately 10-30% ($1,000,000 -$4,000,000), should the
actual physical lest results indicate the need of placing smaller sized rock
and/or less rock around the outfall.
2. Results of the physical wave tank modeling conducted in the near shore zone
(Station 27+00 to 50+00) are inconclusive.
e..m.a 1� Page 4
y
ALTERNATIVES
a Option 1 — No further action
This alternative involves halting any further studies regarding the protective
ballast armor, disregarding the analysis conducted in the engineering report that
indicates the need for additional ballast, and relying on the original design and
current condition of the 120-inch ouffall to continue to protect the outfall from
wave forces well into the future. Although this option is the least expensive, it is
also the most risky approach,
a Option 2 — Use existing analysis to re-rock the 120-inch outfall
This alternative involves halting any further studies (ie., wave tank modeling),
and adopting the recommendation to re-rock the section of the 120-inch outfall
identified in the engineering report and as determined by the recent wave tank
testing. This approach is more responsive than alternative 1, and would provide
additional protection to the 120-inch outfall. However, it is not deemed to be the
most cost-effective approach.
a Option 3— Proceed with additional Wave Tank Modeling to further
investigate the need to re-rock the 120-inch outfall (recommended)
This alternative involves conducting additional physical wave tank modeling to
better define the need for additional rock. The testing will examine the unique
design of protecting the outfall by placing additional ballast over the existing
armament system, and will determine the most effective and economical
protection for the ouffall by limiting projected wave damage in the future.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
CJHJak
QW91obal%genda Draft ReporlslPDCU.39U39-Addendum6.AR 110499.dm
Re 1P Page 5
Ile-
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Investigation and Repair -Ocean Outfalls
JOB NO. J-39
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE TO DATE(%)
Distna-Design Phase $ 225,260 $ 225.260 $ 225,260 $ 225.260 $ 160,000 71%
Design
ConsultenVContmctors $ 1.049,340 $ 1,049,340 $ 714.697 $ 57.764 $ 772.461 $ 590,000 76%
Construction Contmet $ $ $ $ - $
District-Construction
Conlrect $ $ $ $ - $
Contingency $ $ $ $ - $
TOTAL $ 1,274.600 $ - $ 1.274.600 $ 939,957 $ 57,764 $ 997,721 $ 750,000 75%
GmtglopaMgeou OmR n ,,U➢O -3%49 Addendum No.6 BudgeRlEl.xlsl0lstrM
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. J-39
Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls
Total Project Budget: $1,274,600
Consultant: Carollo Enalneers. inc.
Start Dale of Project: March 1996
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs
3127196 Original Investigation and minor repair to ocean ouffalls $433.260 $433.260
PSA
10/22/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-Inch outfeil $38,310 $471,570
4/06/98 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgale repair $23.090 $494,660
8/01/98 3 Provide assistance during bid&construction of endgate repair $21,770 $516.430
3115199 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling)needed to refine $109.860 $626,290
recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the
120-Inch ocean oudall
10/1199 5 Revise the cost allocation by line item to cover additional costs incurred by $0 $626,290
Carollo Engineers.
Pending 6 Provide engineering services to conduct additional wave tank modeling $57,764 $684,054
needed to refine recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to
re-ballast the 120-inch ocean outfall
H:1wp.dtalengQ08S 8 CONTRACTSU-39LL39 PSA status report A=
FAHR COMMITTEE "1BetlngDat. T°"
u/ro/� 11/17/99
AGENDA REPORT IFAHR9 2 I[e 14(C)
FAHe9&92 Nu
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
OCTOBER1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the ALiquid Operating Monies=_ and for the ALong-Term Operating
Monies.-_ The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both
PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-
market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in
value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation
sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
e>»namaaemw ra aa•+a:r+ewmvassed,e aam a.�mmwwmia�=ra:
A„„a. 1 W 7M, Pagel
r
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a
consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is
attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and
reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values
and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio.
Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports.
Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance
with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment
Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet
budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts Oct. 31, 1999 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 12,755,013 5A
Union Bank Checking Amount 345,903 -
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,276,000 4.6
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 19,140,980 4.8
PIMCO-Lang-tern Portfolio 268.351,588 4.7
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,907 5.1
Debt Service Reserves C Trustees 32.157,314 6.1
Petty Cash 4.400 -
TOTAL $335,033,105
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
GGS:SK:Ic
\MOonWCIMy NeNn121INavnelF/Me1FliIA.Np/T,ueurefe qep I.M,bs
Page 2
ReportMonthly Treasurer's
District Fund Balances
$400,000,00.
:❖.❖a .0000 ❖:❖S ❖:❖:� :❖:❖:� •:❖:•:�
.❖.❖a .❖.00• .❖.❖a .❖.❖a :❖.❖a .❖.❖a
..... ..... !.❖.•.0 >.❖.•.o ❖.❖.o �.❖.❖.
..... ..... ..... ..... :.... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... :.... .....
....� ..... ❖.❖.0 ❖.❖.o ❖.❖.o �.❖.❖.
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... :.... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... :.... .....
..... ..... ..... .....
..... :.... ..... ..... ..... .....
Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash
0 .
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 October 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Cumm Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $19,172,765
• Mellon $19,140,980
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $19,192,758
• Mellon $19,187,693
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION OF Portfolio: 0.20
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( aiMoss)of 1%Change: $39,754
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 01y.
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 72%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.46 0.41
3 Months: 1.32 1.20
12 Months: 5.05 4.64
Year-to-Date: 4.18 3.87
Commentary
In contreA m September,barred rues rase across all maWrines in October in eonix ttse to the Fed's October 5 adoption areas inanest rare tightening"bias,"end increased inaction fears
(e.g.3-manh Treasury Bill rates rose 31 hunts points).
• The Liquid portfolio outperformed be barchmuk by 5 basis points in October.
• PIMCO's emphasis on corporates and agencies added to portfolio tatume.
PIMCO will conanue to hold high quality commercial papa and short-term notes to enhance returns.
nt,,V)N . NEYaFDLQ/wa.Mi
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 October 1999)
Long-Term Operating Monfes(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $268,822,907
• Mellon $268,351,588
Historical Cost: $272,398,646
• PIMCO $272,747,687
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.30
Of Index: 2.33
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,259,285
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 31%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance' Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
1 Month: 0.38 0.23
3 Months: 1.41 1.25
12 Months: 2.50 2.20
Year-to-Date: 2.02 2.01
Commentary
Wit interest rates rising across all maturitics in October,the bond market showed weaker returns.
The Long-Term portfolio outperformed its benchmark by IS basis points in October.
PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage.backed secusales and Corporates added to portfolio returns,as these were to best performing sectera
PIMCO will continue to emphasize mortgage-backed securities to enhance rearms.
x:i...wixvicevem..wevarnLrroszarr
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE:' 1
BASE. USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 31-OCT-1999 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
PAYABLES 499,786.25 -499,796.25 -2.580/o 0.00
TOTAL 499,796.25 499,786.25 .2.588/6 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,666,144.00 2,666,144.00 13.76% 0.00
TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,131.67 17.61% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,952,174.45 1,952,174.45 10.08% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 2,189,978.36 ZI89,978.36 11.31% 0.00
MUTUALFUNDS 43,156.75 43,156.75 0.22% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,262,635.23 10,262,635.23 52,98% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS ———————f,7_6TASA.98 9,762,848.98 50.40% 0.06
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.AGENCIES 4,689,174.00 4,689,838.00 24.21% 1,664.00
ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 906,309.00 4.68% 396.00
BANKING&FINANCE 1,949,359.25 1,925,310.25 9.94% -24,049.00
INDUSTRIAL 1,370,198.00 1,356,673.50 7.00% -13,524.50
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 511,200.00 500,000.00 2.58% -11,200.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,424,844.25 9,378,130.75 48.42% -46,713.50
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 130.75 4 . 2% 6,713.
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESMECEIVABLES 228,594.01 228,594.01 1.18% 0.00
TOTAL 228,594.01 229,594.01 1.18% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS T 222 ,3fC.6 -------------T.T9 0.00
09-Now1999 10:31:31 Ewculow Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 31-OCT-1999 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,416,287.24 19,369,573.74 100.00% 46,71330
09-Nw-1999 10:31:31 Exs jw Wwkbrwh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE. USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 31-OCT-1999 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH -38,848.74 -38,948.74 -0.01% 0.00
RECEIVABLES 21,319,402.63 21,319,402.63 7.85% 0.00
PAYABLES -48,111,903.13 48,111,903.13 -17.71% 0.00
TOTAL -26,931,349.24 -26,831,349.24 -9.88% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 25,679,645.55 25,679,645.55 9.45% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 14,935,060.83 14,835,060.83 5.46% 0.00
MUTUALFUNDS 404,715.00 404,715.00 0.15% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 40,919,421.38 40,919,421.38 15.06% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,098,072.14 14,088,072.14 5.19% 0.06
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 66,326,172.33 64,924,012.13 23.86% -1,502,160.20
U.S.AGENCIES 65,699,797.82 64,373,009.06 23.69% -1,326,788.76
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 20,256,975.00 20,498,960.00 7.54% 242,085.00
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,924,074.02 3,885,422.98 1.43% .38,651.04
FHLMC POOLS 9,414,924.17 9,289,433.95 3.42% -126,490.22
FHLMC MULTICLASS 8,444,788.79 8,336,557.94 3.07% -108,230.85
FNMA POOLS 1,686,949.82 1,693,305.41 0.62% 6,355.59
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 89,082.99 89,026.88 0.03% -56.11
ABS:CAR LOAN 603,942.00 604,206.00 0.22% 264.00
ABS:HOME EQUITY 487.349.66 486,740.47 0.18% -609.19
MUTUALFUNDS 1,000,000.00 989,900.00 0.36% -10,100.00
BANKING&FINANCE 54,047,184.00 53,824,774.50 19.81% ,222,409.50
INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 15,967,946.05 5.880A .1,062,022.95
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,986,120.00 0.73% -165,130.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,415,100.00 2.73% -82,155.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 253,659,614.60 254,263,515.37 93.58% .4,396,099.23
09-Nov4999 10.34.57 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 31-OCT-1999 FINAL
LONG TERMOPER-P/MCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 258,659,614.60 254,263,515.37 93.58% 4,3%,099.23
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,351,280.55 3,351,280.55 1.23% 0.00
TOTAL 3,351,280.55 3,35L280.55 1.23% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 1 80. ,351,280.
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 276,098,967.29 271,702,868.06 100.00% 4,3%,0".23
09-Nov-/999 /0:34:57 Fiecutive Workbench
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I
OCSF00511102 1999/10/32 RUN DATE ' 11/05/99
DISTAICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 13.13.36
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
43,156.75 DREYBUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.673 AAA 100.000 43,156.75 .42
996095247 AAA 43,156.75 .22
2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HIS COSP DISC 4.846 .000 P-1 97.609 1,952,274.45 11.02
313396NU MAT 11/02/1999 A-1♦ 1,952,174.45 9.94
900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 4.940 .000 P-1 93.563 878,069.00 8.55
38142UY30 11/03/1999 978,069.00 4.43
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 97.462 3,411,181.67 33.23
912395DR4 03102/20U0 DO 03/04/99 A-lf 3,411,181.67 13.32
500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HIS ASSN DISC 5.132 .000 P-1 99.953 499,786.25 4.86
313588HV3 MAY 11/04/1999 A-1♦ 499,706.25 2.54
800,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN DISC 5.239 .000 P-1 99.249 793,991.11 0.33
313588QQ1 MAT 12/17/1999 A-13 793,991.11 4.04
900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISC NTS 5.262 .000 P-1 99.538 896,201.00 8.33
313588NU5 MAY 11/03/1999 A-l♦ 896,201.00 4.56
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.333 .000 P-1 99.382 894,435.00 8.31
36959OYM0 12/17/1999 894,435.00 4.55
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.338 .000 P-1 99.293 893,640.00 8.30
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 893.640.D0 4.55
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.998 .034 10,262,635.23 100.00
10,262,635.23 52.24
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DENS .000 4.303 AAA 99.968 999,200.00 10.65
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO OS/18/99 AAA 999,680.00 5.09
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MINI 5.001 8.000 AA3 100.000 $11,200.00 5.33
264399DB9 B.ODOB 11/01/1991 DO 11/01/94 AA- 500,000.00 2.55
950,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 3.123 A2 1GO.031 863,753.00 9.06
118154BX4 3.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 A 850,263.50 4.33
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE l
OCSM7511102 1999/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/99
DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.36
-------------
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARXET TOTAL COST/ a TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
900,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP HIS 5.305 6.252 A2 99.991 909,657.00 9.59
3I042MIG2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DD O1/11/14 A 899,739.00 4.58
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTH #SB00110 5.653 8.421 A3 100.347 515,125.00 5.35
993SOMEPI 8.4508 01/12/2DU0 UP O1/12/95 A 501,735.00 2.55
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE COME DUE 5.815 4.848 AAA 99.734 3,600,974.00 39.34
3133M7EM2 4.835% 01/29/2000 DD 01/28/99 AAA 3,690,158.00 18.39
900,000.00 FORD HTR CR MTN i TR 00539 6.312 6.971 Al 100.701 905,913.00 9.66
345402YXI 7.020% 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 906,309.00 4.61
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS ULOGS MTV TR 00252 6.353 6.413 A3 99.I90 400,216.00 4.25
52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,160.00 2.03
500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 1.535 9.531 A3 101.282 506,445.00 5.39
46014W2 9.300% 03/15/2D00 DO 03/21/90 BBB. 506,410.00 2.58
125,000.00 FIDOVA CAP CORD 6.924 6.392 BAA1 99.741 124,361.25 1.32
318074AF0 6.3751 10/15/2000 DD 1D/11/95 A- 124,676.25 .63
_________________ ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.616 5.9B1 9,424,844.25 100.00
9,3I8,130.75 47.34
_______ _______ _______________ ---------
TOTAL 4.805 3.045 19,687,419.48 100.00
19,640,765.99 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSFO7522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE t 11/05/99
DISTRICT[ LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.13.36
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
404,715.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.673 AAA 100.000 404,715.00 .98
996085247 AAA 404,715.00 .14
6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 5.303 .000 P-1 99.575 6t511t928.00 16.O6
03018BY45 11/04/1999 6,501,928.00 2.23
5,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 5.306 .000 P-1 99.691 5,283,645.00 12.91
]42)1SYH2 11/17/1999 5,283,645.08 1.39
500,000.00 HEINS NJ CO DISC 5.308 .DDO P-1 99.472 491t360.00 1.21
42307KZ18 12/01/1999 49It360.00 .17
6,300,000.00 DO PONT DE REMOVE DISC 5.326 .000 P-1 99.514 6,269,392.50 15.32
26354BY89 11/08/1999 6,269,392.50 2.12
5,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.341 .000 P-1 99.308 5,362,605.56 13.10
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 5,362,605.56 1.82
1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.343 .000 P-1 99.689 1,694,714.41 4.14
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 1,694,714.41 .51
14,900,000.00 FEDERAL MOVE LN MW CORP DISC 26.264 .000 P-1 99.564 14,835,060.83 36.25
313396MI MAT 11/04/1999 A-1+ 14,835,060.93 5.03
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 7.370 .106 40,919,421.38 100.00
40,919,421.39 13.87
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.903 Al 99.867 1,992,800.00 .78
066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,991t340.00 .66
3t500t000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN ITR00615 .000 S.SSI Al 99.828 3,498,635.00 1.37
1712OOEOD FLTG RT OB/08/2002 DD 04/08/99 A+ 3,493,980.00 1.18
2,000,000.00 FORD MTN CA CO TERN ENHANCED .000 5.606 Al 99.812 1,990,613.60 .78
345397SCO FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/90 A 1t996t240.00 .68
3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN .000 5.596 A2 100.000 3,010,830.00 1.17
37042MVR9 MEG RT 12/13/2DOl DO 12/15/98 A 3,000,000.00 1.02
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS FADE 4
OCSF07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/99
DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 13.13.36
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE
SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOUR YIELD S-P PRICE HARKET VALUE \ TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.567 A2 I00.001 3,91B,368.50 1.55
330425GV5 FLTG AT 08/18/2003 DO OB/13/98 A 3,950,039.50 1.34
2,000,000.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NTS .000 5.453 A3 100.443 2,000,000.00 .79
42332BBKB FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DO O6/25/99 A- 2,008,860.00 .69
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINE NTH BTR 00246 .000 5.657 A3 100.680 3,000,000.00 1.18
42333NLF7 TIM RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 3,020,400.00 1.02
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CO MTN .000 5.442 A2 100.125 4,CG0o000.00 1.53
44181KEAS FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/90 A. 4,005,000.00 1.36
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN ME SR IOOSJO .000 5.233 A2 100.181 999,188.90 .39
44181KET4 PLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,001,810.00 .34
7,302,960.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.693 3.648 AAA 99.335 7,271,803.32 2.85
9128273AB 3.625% O7/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 AAA 3,257,316.50 2.46
10,546,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.322 3.541 AAA 95.312 10,267,075.00 3.95
9128212M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 AAA 30,051,698.83 3.41
4,OD0,000.00 HORGAN STANLEY NTH 4TR 00299 5.170 5.461 AA 99.609 3,997,780.00 1.56
6174SENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 A9 3,984,360.00 1.35
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.533 AAA 116.703 6,233,593.75 2.29
912810DES 11.325E 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/03 AAA 5,935,150.00 1.98
2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.314 AAA IGO.969 2,167,321.15 .83
912823X54 06.335E 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,120,349.00 .32
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.892 AAA 120.172 6,698,250.00 2.45
912810MO 11.835E 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/03 AAA 6,248,944.00 2.12
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.518 AA3 99.026 1,543,215.00 .59
046003HYS 6.500E 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,495,890.00 .51
1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.360 5.953 A3 99.240 999,730.00 .38
42333HXJO 5.350E 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 902o40O.00 .33
1,200,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.368 6.430 AAA 101.094 1,213,406.25 .43
912823Y22 06.500E 05/31/2001 DO 05/31/96 AAA 1,213,128.00 .41
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.004 6.639 A2 97.921 2,060,739.00 .33
011400GN6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,963,316.05 .63
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 5
OCSF03522202 1919/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/99
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.13.36
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __________
23,420,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.807 5.644 AAA 99.656 23,351,289.85 9.10
9128275QI 05.625% 09/30/2001 DD 09/30/99 AAA 23,349,400.80 7.91
5,000,000.00 U B TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.197 AAA 100.859 5,006,402.25 1.98
9128232L5 06.250% 02/20/2002 DO 02/29/97 AAA 5,042,950.00 1.31
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.949 6.919 A2 98.671 3,073,170.00 1.16
812400JAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 OD 07/09/97 A- 2,960,130.00 1.00
14,350,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN MIN 5.882 6.249 AAA 91.375 14,560,462.50 5.30
31364GLD9 5.910% 12/15/2008 OD 12/15/90 AAA 13,477,812.50 4.57
6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 5.982 5.856 ml 99.906 5,996,400.00 2.35
63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/90 AA- 5,994,360.00 2.03
165,394.90 PHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1534 E 5.912 5.913 99.710 664,459.18 .26
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 663,510.49 .22
15,000,00G.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN NTH 5.981 5.959 AAA 99.329 14,955,300.00 5.85
31364G2VO 5.620% 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,899,200.00 5.05
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.393 AA3 99.022 2,526,725.00 .98
59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,493,050.00 .84
3,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.069 AAA 98.868 7,497,255.00 2.91
079967AXS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 AAA 7,415,100.00 2.51
12,5U0,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BIG CORP DEBS 6.062 6.026 AAA 99.595 12,485,625.00 4.09
3134A3EHI 6.000% 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/59 AAA 12,446,875.00 4.22
2,000,000.00 SANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 6.133 6.206 A2 98.700 1,999,600.00 .33
06605TAL6 6.1250 03/15/2002 US 03/12/99 A 1,974,000.00 .63
89,083.00 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.204 RAI, 99.937 89,D82.99 .03
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 89,026.88 .03
I,OOD,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN ITN, 00004 6.201 6.263 A3 98.990 1,000,000.00 .30
73317FADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB. 989,9DO.00 .34
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 6.207 6.088 AAA 98.562 2,455,859.38 .96
3133TKKU3 6.0001 11/15/2011 AAA 2,464,050.00 .83
487,349.66 GREEN TREE CORD 99-0 CL A-1 6.290 6.298 AAA 99.875 487,349.66 .19
3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DD 09/26/99 AAA 486,740.47 .16
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSP07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DAM t 11/05/99
DISTBICTs LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME i 13.13.36
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ____-----_
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN NON 6.291 6.239 AAA 99.959 4,499,705.00 1.76
31364CWS 6.030E 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/57 AAA 4.493r655.00 1.52
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN PUMA COPI 125 6.306 6.292 AM 97.906 714.915.63 .28
IIFOI16BO VAR RT 11/01/2039 AAA 714,715.63 .24
600,000.00 FORD NTR CR MTB 4 TR 00538 6.312 6.971 Al 100.701 603,942.00 .23
345402YXI 7.020E 10/10/2000 DD 10/10/95 A 604,206.00 .20
3.319.951.18 FNLMC MULTICLKSS CM E3 A 6.316 5.989 AAA 18.610 3,323,582.23 1.26
3133TCE95 6.324E 09/15/2032 AAA 3,274,069.45 1.11
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.015 A2 99.040 2,031,960.00 .73
073902ARI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 1,990,800.00 .63
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNNA 6P MTG 6.342 6.465 AAA 92.812 5.334,375.00 2.28
OSN0606B3 6.000E 11/15/2028 AAA 5,000.350.00 1.93
5.000,000.OD LEGMAN BRUN ELMS MTH 100196 6.364 6.654 A3 99.937 5,039,450.00 1.96
52517PJD4 6.650E 11/09/2000 DO 11/08/96 A 4,996,850.00 1.69
2,000,000.00 FNLW_ MULTICLA88 CTP T11 A6 6.416 6.719 AAA 96.746 2,000,888.00 .76
3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2016 AAA 1,934,920.00 .66
21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNNA SF MTG 6.518 6.813 AAA 95.344 20,256,875.00 8.06
OIN062615 6.500E 01/15/2029 AAA 20.498.960.00 6.94
2,351,117.35 FBLMC MULTICLASS CTP HER 16205 6.540 6.909 AM 96.847 2,194,977.41 .80
3133TI7A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,041,878.65 .69
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 9.172 A2 100.052 9,103,700.00 3.56
318154BB2 9.250E 02/15/2000 A 9,076r680.00 3.03
9,270,071.19 FIRMC GROUP 1G5-0476 6.628 6.906 AAA 100.196 9,414,924.17 3.65
312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 9,288,433.95 3.15
2,199,015.99 SERA, II POOL 4080098M 6.305 6.323 AAA 100.828 2,246,097.58 .87
36225CC20 6.315E 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 2,216,215.56 .75
10,500,000.00 PBDERAL BONE IN MTG CORP DEBS 6.711 6.450 AAA 97.672 10,323,075.00 4.03
3134A31C0 6.300E 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,255,560.00 3.47
2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR HT 6.717 6.733 A2 98.391 1,992,280.00 .YJ
571748A88 6.62SE 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,967.820.00 .67
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE
OCSE07522202 1999/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/99
DISTRICT: TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 13.13.36
PAR VALUE FIX AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE EXPERT VALUE % TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.759 Al 99.129 2,995,060.00 1.16
345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 2,973,870.00 1.01
2.500,000.DO COUNTRYWIDE ROMB LEE INC NT 6.066 6.918 A3 99.021 2,498,400.00 .97
22237UAB0 6.050% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,475,525.00 .84
1,650,637.75 GUM II POOL 10080023 6.869 6.057 AM 101.125 1,677,976.44 .65
36225CA29 6.125E 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,669,207.42 .57
992,867.21 VERA POOL 00252703 6.877 6.595 AAA 98.562 972,234.19 .38
31371HU48 6.500% 09/01/2006 DO 08/01/99 AM 978.509.78 .33
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.940 AAA 140.203 4,029,030.31 1.45
912810DJ4 13.2500 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/64 AM 3,705,075.00 1.26
2.000,ODO.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.257 BM3 99.306 2,151,250.00 .78
542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 1,986,120.00 .67
970,530.37 NMP/NUNTOON PAIGE 1PC98-10 FAA 7.684 7.667 AM 97.828 957,277.91 .37
302998GE3 7.500E 11/15/2030 DD 10/21/99 AM 957,277.91 .32
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.672 6.057 258,659,614.60 100.00
254,263,515.37 86.15
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 4.724 5.943 299,579,035.98 100.00
295,182,936.75 100.00
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR SEPT 05-Oct-1999 -1.70
NA9123459 0.00
CW 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR SEPT 05-Oc1-1999 .6.80
NA9123459 0.00
CW 05-OM-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 21-Oct-1999 -0.85
99363C783 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 22-Oct-1999 -0.85
99363D732 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 22-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-Oct-1999 .0.85
99363E607 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26.Oct-1999 -0.85
99363F737 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 26-Oct-1999 0.00
PURCHASES
09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Eucutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
117,407.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oct-1999 ,117,407.64
996095247 01-Oct-1999 117,407.64
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2M67.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oc1-1999 -29,567.42
996085247 01-Oct-1999 28,567.42
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
117,407.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OG-1999 -117,407.64
996085247 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 01-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
28,567.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Otl-1999 -28,567.42
996085247 01-Oc1-1999 0.00
FC 01-00-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,342,890.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Oct-1999 -13,342,890.62
996085247 04-Ocb1999 13,342,890.62
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,342,890.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Oct-1999 -13,342,890.62
9%085247 04-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 04.OG-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,797.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 -3,797.30
996085247 05-00-1999 3,797.30
B 0.00
09-No 1999 10:07:55 Eeecutiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsO000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,797.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-00-1999 -3,797.30
996085247 05-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
9D0,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Oc1-1999 -8%,201.00
313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 05-Oct-1999 996,201.00
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.DO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Oct-1999 -996,201.00
313588NU5 MAT 11/03/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,90000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Oct-1999 -14,935,060.83
313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 05-0ct-1999 14,835,060.83
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Oct-1999 -14,835,060.93
313396NVI MAT 11/04/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 05-Oc1-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
5,565.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oc1-1999 -5,565.00
996085247 06-Oc1-1999 5,565.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
5,565.OD DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oc1-1999 -5,565.00
996085247 06-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 06-Oct-1999 0.00
09-New1999 /0:07:55 Ececuti.Warkbeec6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsO000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 06-Get-1999 -6,571,928.00
03018BY45 11/04/1999 06-Oct-1999 6,571,929.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,600,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 06-Oct-1999 -6,571,928.00
03018BY45 11/04/1999 06-0ct-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 06-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-0a-1999 -894,435.00
369591YHO 11/17/1999 06-Oa-1999 894,435.00
D GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-Oct-1999 -894.433.00
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 06-Oc1.1999 0.00
PC GENERAL ELECTRIC 06-0a-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,300,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 06-Oc1-1999 -6,269,392.50
26354BY89 11/09/1999 06-0a-1999 6,269,392.50
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,300,000.00 DUPONT DENEMOUR DISC 06-Ott-1999 -6,269,392.50
26354BY89 1[10811999 06-0a-1999 0.00
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Oa-1999 -175,500.00
996085247 07-Ott-1999 175,500.00
B 0.00
09-No 1999 10..07:55 &c wiw IVwkbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.-
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Oct-1999 -175,500.00
996085247 07.Oct-1999 0.00
FC 07.Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
165.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-W-1999 -165.33
996085247 09-00-1999 165.33
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
165.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Oct-1999 -165.33
996035247 08-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 08-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-0ct-1999 •299,934.67
313588MW2 MAT 10/12I999 09-Oct-1999 299.834.67
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
30000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Oa-1999 ,299,834.67
313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 08-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY OS-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
295,670.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Oct-1999 -295,670.60
996085247 13-Oct-1999 295,670.60
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
295,670.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Oct-1999 -295,670.60
996085247 13-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 13-0a-1999 0.00
09-No 1999 I0:07,55 &emliw WmkbeMh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
33,412.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Oct-1999 -33,412.22
996085247 15-Oct-1999 33,412.22
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
33,412.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Oct-1999 -33,412.2E
996085247 15-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
330,392.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OctI999 -530,392.87
996085247 15-Oct-1999 530,392.97
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
530.392.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-00-1999 -530.392.97
996085247 15-0ct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Oct-1999 499.712.79
313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 15-Oct-1999 499,712.78
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Oct-1999 499,712.78
313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 15-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4.321.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Oct-1999 4,321.88
996085247 18-Oct-1999 4,321.88
B 0.00
09-Now/999 10:07 55 &ecMiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocs0000loo00 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,321.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Get-1999 4,321.38
996085247 IS-Oct-1999 0.00
FC I8-oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,130.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 1wa-1999 -47.130.50
996095247 IS-Oet-1999 47,130.50
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,130.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18.Oct-1999 -47.130.50
996085247 I"d.1999 0.00
FC 18-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
5,416.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-00-1999 -5,416.25
996085247 20-Oct-1999 5,416.25
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
5,416.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASII MGMT 20.0ct-1999 -5.416.25
996085247 20.Oct-1999 0.00
FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
896,992.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Oct-1999 -896,992.96
996085247 20-Oc1-1999 896,992.96
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
896,992.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Oct-1999 .89C992.96
996085247 20-0ct-1999 0.00
FC 20.Od-1999 0.00
09-Nowl999 /0:07:55 Executive Wakbewh
Q RANGE O COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
00000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SRARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
99363C783 05.000 1021/1999 DD 10/20/ 20-Oct-1999 900,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 1020/ 20-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 20-Oa-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20.544.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .20,544.19
996085247 21-Oct-1999 20,544.19
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,544.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .20,544.19
996085247 21-Oct-1999 0.00
PC 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,484.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct.1999 -6,484A5
996085247 21-Oct-1999 6,484.15
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,484.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Oct-1999 .6,484.15
996085247 21-Oct-1999 0.00
PC 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
9936313732 05.080%10/22/1999 DD 1021/ 21-Oc1-1999 900,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
-.W—.1009 M075.5 &ecufive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
9936313732 05.080%10/22/1999 DO 10/211 21.OM-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21.Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oct-1999 -198,596.67
63743DZ87 IV08/1999 21.Oct-1999 198.596.67
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21.OU-1999 ,198,586.67
63743D787 121WI999 21-Oct-1999 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oc1-1999 ,893,640.00
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 21-Oct-1999 893,640.00
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Oc1-1999 -893,640.00
63743DZ87 12/M1999 21-Ord-1999 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
126.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-0m-1999 .126.15
996085247 22Ad.1999 126.15
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
126.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22.Oc1.1999 .126.15
9%085247 22-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 22.Ocb1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Erecu(ive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
35,981.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Oct-I999 -35,98111
996085247 22-Oct-1999 35.981.11
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
35,991.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Oct-1999 -35,991.11
996085247 22-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 22-OM-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 22-Oct-1999 -5,164,018.89
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 22-OU-1999 5,164,018.89
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
99363E607 05.020%1025/1999 DD 10221 22-Oct-1999 900,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 22-Oct-1999 -5,164,018.89
63743DZ87 12/08/1999 22-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
90D,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO - 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
99363E607 05.020561025119"DO 10221 22-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
421,430.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-00-1999 421,430.50
996095247 25-0U-1999 421,430.50
B 0.00
09-No 1999 10.07:55 Ececutm Workbench
Q ORANGE E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, /1
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
421,430.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25.Oc1-1999 421,430.50
996085247 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 -800,000.00
99363F737 05.0501/o 1012 6/1 9 9 9 DO 10/25/ 25-Oct-1999 800,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 -800.000.00
99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DD 101251 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6.120.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 -6,120.26
996085247 26-Od-1999 6,120.26
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,120.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 -6,120.26
996085247 26-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 26-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 HEINZ HI CO DISC 26-Oct-1999 497,360.00
42307KZIS 12/01/1999 26-Oct-1999 497,360.00
B MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 HEINZ HJ CO DISC 260ct-1999 497,360.00
42307KZIS 12/01/1999 26-Oct-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED[NCO 26-Od-1999 0.00
09-Nav-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsG000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 26-00-1999 -793,991.11
313598QQI MAT 12/17/1999 26-Oct-1999 793,991.11
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 26.Od-1999 -793,991.11
313589QQI MAT 12/17/1999 26-Oa-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 26-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21640.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Oct-1999 -21,640.51
996GS5247 27-Oct-1999 21,640.51
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21.640.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Oct-1999 -21,640.51
996095247 27-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 27-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,70D,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 27-Oct-1999 -1,694,714.41
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 27-Oct-1999 1,694,714.41
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 27.On-1999 -1,694,714.41
36959JYHO 11/17/1999 27-0ct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MG NY 27-Oct-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
5,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 27.Oct-1999 -5,293,645.08
74271SYH2 11/17/1999 27-0c1.1999 5,293,645.08
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
09-,V 4999 10:07.55 Exmim Wwkbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. /3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 27-Oct-1999 -5,283,645.03
74271SYH2 11/17/1999 27-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
42,712.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 2Wct-1999 42,712.92
996085247 28-Oct-1999 42,712.92
0 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
42,712.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Oct-1999 -42,712.92
996095247 28-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 28-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
39.720.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Oct-1999 -38,720.24
996085247 29-Oct-1999 38,720.24
0 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
38,720.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Oct-1999 -39,720.24
996095247 29-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 29-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-Oct-1999 -499,786.25
313588NV3 MAT 11/04119" 01-Nov-1999 499,786.25
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Sep-1999 -9,989,697.50
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2029 21-Oct4999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-Oct-1999 0.00
no-V-1999 100755 Ezeartive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Sep-1999 -11,290,000.00
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Oct-t999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 713,118.75
11 F0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 -713,118.75
BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Scp-1999 -713,119.75
I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/01/2029 25-Oct-1999 713,119.75
R GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 -713,118.75
IIFO116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Sep-1999 -5,781,250.00
OIN11606A9 6.000%10/152028 21-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF 2146 QT 29-Scp-1999 -2,457,109.38
3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 D4-Oct-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 04-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 -953,125.00
OIN0626B3 6.50OV 11/012029 22-Nov-1999 953,125.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Erecmive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINnOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oet-1999 -10.494,375.00
OIN0626B3 6.500%11/012029 22-Nov-1999 10,494,375.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 06-00-1999 -506.445.00
460146Al2 9.700%03/152000 DD 0321N 12-0ct-1999 506,445.00
0 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 0&Oct-1999 -3,637.50
460146Al2 9.700%031152000 DD 03/2119 12-0ct-1999 0.00
I 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 06-0M-1999 -510,092.50
460146Al2 9.700%03/152000 DO 03/2119 12-00-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CONY 12.0O.1999 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O9-0O.1999 -1,213,406.25
912827Y22 06.500%05212001 DD05131/ 12-00-1999 1,213,406.25
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-0ct-1999 -28,557.38
912827Y22 06.500°/.O5/312001 DO 05/311 12-00-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-00-1999 -1,241,963.63
912827Y22 06.500%05212001 DD0521/ 12.Oct-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 12-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:O7:53 - Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Od-1999 -23,351,289.85
9128275QI 05.625%09130/2001 DO 09130/ 13-Oct-1999 23,351,299.95
B BARCLAYS BANK.NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Oc1-1999 -46,811.99
9128275QI 05.625%09/302001 DO 09/30/ 13-Oct-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-Oct-1999 -23,398,101.94
912827SQ1 05.625%09/3012001 DO 09/30/ 13-Oc1-1999 0.00
FC BARCLAYS BANK NEW YORK 13-0ct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTG 12-Oct-1999 -9,968,437.50
OI1,1062683 6.500%11/152029 22-Nov-1999 9,%8,437.50
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -3,688,974.00
3133M7EW2 4.835%0128/2000 DO 01/2919 13-Oct-1999 3,688,974.00
B MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -37,269.79
3133M7EW2 4.835%01/29/2000 DO OV2819 13-Oct-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Oct-1999 -3,726,243.79
3133M7EW2 4.835%0128/2000 DO 0128/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 13-Oct-1999 0.00
09-,V 4999 10:07.55 Executive IPwkbenc6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
978,530.37 WMPlHUNTOON PAIGE SPC98-10F 13-Oct-1999 -957.277.91
302998GE3 7.500%11/15/2030 DO 10/2119 20-Oct-1999 957,277.91
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
978,530.37 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE OPC99-10 F 13.Oct-1999 -3,873.35
302998GE3 7.500%11/15/2030 DO 10/21/9 20-Oct-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
978,530.37 WMPtHUNTOON PAIGE SPC98-10F 13-0q-1999 -961,15126
302998GE3 7.500%11/152030 DO 1021/9 20-Oct-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 29-Od-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900.000,00 FORD MTR CR MTN 0 TR 00538 14-Oct-1999 ,905,913.00
345402YKI 7.020%10(102000 DO 10/10N 19-OU-1999 905,913.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00539 14-Oct-1999 -4579.50
345402YKI 7.020%I WI02000 DO 10/1019 19.Oc1-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 4 TR 00538 14-Oc1-1999 -907,492.50
345402YKI 7.020%10/102000 DO 10/10/9 19-Oct-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 19-0ct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 4 TR 00538 14.0ct-1999 -603,942.00
345402YKI 7.020%101102WO DO IW 10/9 19-Oc1-1999 603,942.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
09-No 1999 10.07.55 Executive W.,*bench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN#TR 00539 14-0c61999 .1,053.00
345402YKI 7.020%10/10/2000 DD 10/10/9 19-Oct-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN#TR 00538 I COc1-1999 -604,995.00
345402YKI 7.020%10/10/2000 DO 10/1019 19-Oct-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 19-0ct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG IB-Oct-1999 .5,734,375.00
OIN0606B7 6.000%11/15/2028 22-Nov-1999 5,734,375.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA COF1125 18-Oct-1999 -714,715.63
11F011688 6.160%11/012029 23-No,1999 714,715.63
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-Oct-1999 -124,361.25
318074AF8 6.375%10/152000 DO 10/1119 25-Oct-1999 124,361.25
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-0n-1999 -221.35
318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DO 10111/9 25-Oct4999 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 20-Oct-1999 -124,582.60
318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DO 10111/9 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-/999 /0:07:55 Executive Wo kbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 19
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURONMASFMTG 27-Oct-1999 -9,896,250.00
OIN062615 6.500%01115=9 25-Jan-2000 9,896,250.00
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTO 27-Oa-1999 -10,360,625.00
OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2029 25-Ian-2000 10,360,625.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
PAY UPS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -17,640.00
9128273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 17,640.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 .17,640.00
9129273AS 3.625%07115/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 0.00
PC 29-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
25,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -25,500.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD OI/I S/ 15-Jul-1999 25,500.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
25.500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -25.500.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 011151 15-Jul-1999 0.00
FC 29.Oct-1999 0.00
09-No 1999 10;07;55 Fs ullva Wwkbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Ott-1999 -22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/1512032 01-Oct-1999 22.50
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIT E3 A 01-00-1999 -22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-0ct-1999 0.00
FC I"c1-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11497.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Oct-1999 -11,697.01
3133T17A4 6.000'/.11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-0ct-1999 11,697.01
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11.697.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CfF SER 162 01-Oct-1999 -11,697.01
3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 18-Oct-1999 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-635,067.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 635,067.63
996085247 05-Oct-1999 -635,067.63
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-635,067.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-1999 635,067.63
996085247 05-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 05-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 /0:07:55 Erecmive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2/
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG000/o600 01-OCT-1"9-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,841,320.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oct-1999 12,941,320.50
996085247 06-Oct-1999 -12.841,320.50
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,841,320.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oct-1999 12,841,320.50
996085247 06-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 06-0ct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-285,410.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-1999 295,410.97
996085247 12-0ct-1999 -285,410.97
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-110,389.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oa-1999 110,388.17
996085247 12-Oct-1999 -110,398.17
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-285,410.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-W-1999 285,410.97
996085247 12-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 12-0ct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-110.388.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-1999 110.389.17
996085247 12-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 12-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I2-Oct-1999 97,608.72
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 12-Oct-1999 -97,609.72
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
09-Nw4999 10.07:55 Eimam IVmkbmh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-00-1999 2,085.61
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/19" 12.Oct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12.00.1999 99,694.33
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 12.Oc1-1999 0.00
PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 12.Oc1.1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 13-00-1999 4,483,100.00
313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13.Oct-1999 4,483,100.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I3.Oct-1999 91055.00
313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13.Oct.1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I3-0cb1999 4,492,155.00
313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 13-OM-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Oc1-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-8,301.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19.00-1999 9,301.39
996085247 19.Oc1.1999 -9,301.39
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-8.301.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 9,301.39
996095247 19.Oct-1999 0.00
PC 19-00-1999 0.00
09.N.v-1999 10..07:55 Ewwhe Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999 -31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-656,495.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 656,495.00
996095247 19-Oct-1999 -656,495.00
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-656,495.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-1999 656,495.00
996085247 19-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 19-w-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 390,434.89
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 -390,434.99
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 8,756.22
3133%NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oo-1999 399,191.11
313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00
PC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 19-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-0ct-1999 797,133.33
313394NOO MAT 10/22/1999 20-Oct-1999 -797,133.33
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 20-Oct-1999 2,648.45
313384NGO MAT 10/27/1999 20-Oct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10.07:55 Exenrtive Workbench
Qji ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-Oct-1999 799,781.78
313394NGO MAT 1022/1999 20-Oct-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 900,000.00
99363C783 05.000%10/21/1999 DD I020/ 21-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Oct-1999 125.00
99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 10/20/ 21-Oct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-0n4999 900,125.00
99363C783 05.000%1021/1999 DO 1020/ 21-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 900,000.00
99363D732 05.080%10/22/1999 DO 1021/ 22-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Oct-1999 127.00
99363D732 05.090%1022/1999 DD 1021/ 22-OU-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22.Oct-1999 900,127.00
99363D732 05.080%1022/1999 DD 1021/ 22-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22.Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nt 1999 10:07:55 Executive fVorkbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-24,206.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-1999 24,206.95
996095247 25-Oct-1999 -24,206.95
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-24,206.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-1999 24,206.95
996095247 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 900,000.00
99363E607 05.020% 10/25/1999 DD 10/22/ 25-Oct-1999 -900,000.00
S LEI[MAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 376.50
99363E607 05.02W.10/25/1999 DD 10/22/ 25-0ct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 25-Oct-1999 900,376.50
99363E607 05.0209/o 1025/1999 DO 10/22/ 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 25-0ct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,458,511.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 1,458,511.26
996085247 26-Oct-1999 -1,458,511.26
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,459,511.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Oct-1999 1,458,511.26
996085247 26-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 26-Oct-1999 0.00
094ov-/999 10:07:55 Exenrtive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Oct-1999 800,000.00
99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DO 10251 26-OU-1999 -800,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-00-1999 112.22
99363F737 05.050%10/26/1999 DO 10251 26-0ct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Oc1.1999 800,112.22
99363F737 05.050%1026/1999 DO 101251 2&Oct-1999 0.00
PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 26-W-1999 0.00
AXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Od-1999 11,450,156.25
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Ott-1999 -11,286,847.83
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 163,308.42
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Oct-1999 11,450,156.25
OIN0626AS 6.500%10/152029 - 21-Och1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-00-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-0a-1999 929,039.07
912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 111151 12-OU-1999 -967,825.47
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -38,786.40
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-Oa-1999 27,513.59
912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 11/151 12-0ct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
09-No 1999 /0:07:55 Ere,.1me Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcSGml0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCl'-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,900,000.00 USTREASURYNOTES 09-00.1999 956,552.66
912827D25 07.500%II/15/2001 DO 11115/ 12.Od-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 12-0ct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12-Oct-1999 3,698,974.00
3133M7EW2 4.835%01/2820W DO 0128/9 13.Oc1.1999 -3,699,104.60
S I P MORGAN SECS INC,NEW YOR -10.130.60
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3.700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12.Oc1.1999 37,269.79
3133M7EW2 4.935%01282000 DD 01/2819 13-0ct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 12-OM-1999 3,726,243.79
3133M7EW2 4.835%01282000 DO 012819 13-Oc1-1999 0.00
FC I P MORGAN SECS MC,NEW YOR 13.Oc1.1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.10.500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12.Oct-1999 9,979,921.99
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Oct-1999 -9,992,839.67
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 97,092.21
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Oc1-1999 9,979,921.98
O1N0626A5 6.500 10/152029 21-0c1-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-W-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 12.Oa-1999 19,145,293.00
31364CZY7 6.670%03272002 DD 0327/9 13-00-1999 -20,012,510.00
S BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOEIE -867.217.00
09-Nov-1999 10.07:55 W kb c6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINRASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 12-Oct-1999 56,324.44
31364CZY7 6.670%03127R002 DO 03127/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 12-Oct-1999 19.201.617.44
31364CZY7 6.670%03/27/2002 DD 03/27/9 13-Oct-1999 0.00
FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 13-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 13-Oct-1999 948,125.00
OIN0626B3 6.5009%11/012029 22-Nov-1999 -951,375.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI -3,250.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG IS-Oct-1999 5,739,990.23
OIN0606A9 6.000%10/152028 21-Oct-1999 -5,791,250.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 41,259.77
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 18-Oct-1999 5,739,990.23
OIN0606A9 6.0001A 10/15/2028 21-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA I ITN IS-Oct-1999 715,114.84
I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 -713,118.75
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 1,996.09
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA I ITH IB-Oct-1999 715,114.84
I IF0116AO VAR RT 10/012029 25-Oct-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Esecotive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG0o0I0000 0I-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 27-Oct-1999 9,914,296.89
OIN0626B3 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 -9,999,437.50
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -75,140.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 27AM-1999 10,379,531.25
OIN0626133 6.500%11/01/2029 22-Nov-1999 -10,465,125.00
S BEAR STEARNS h CO INC.NY -85,593.75
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,160.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 -47,160.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 47,212.09
PDC 51.58
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Scp•1999 47.193.00
3133TC695 6324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 -47,234.60
PD -51.60
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 47,183.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 15-Oc61999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-0ct-1999 214,369.67
3128DDQ55 TOM 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-0ct-1999 -217,719.20
PD .3,349.53
09-No 1999 /0.07:55 Exeamw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP#G5.0476 01-Oct-1999 214,369.67
3128DDQ55 7.0001/102/01/2003 DO 02/01t 01-0c1-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-44.618.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-1999 44,618.25
3133T02D5 5.9001/6 0611 V2017 01-Oct-1999 44,555.51
PD 62.74
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
44.619.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-1999 44,618.25
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-30,017.10 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Oct-1999 30,017.10
36225CAZ9 6.125%12/202026 DO 12/01t 01-Oct-1999 -30,514.26
PD 497.16
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-30,017.10 GNMA H POOL#0080023 01-0ct-1999 30,017.10
36225CAZ9 6.125%12202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,006.64 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Oct-1999 28,006.64
36225CC20 6.375%06/20/2027 OD 06101/ 01-Oct-1999 -28,619.29
PD -612.65
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,006.64 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Oct-1999 28,006.64
36225CC20 6.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 20-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nw-/999 10.07.53 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE M
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT!
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST!
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-77,449.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Oct-1999 77,449.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Oct-1999 -77,534.21
PD -94.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,205.68 FNMA POOL80252703 01-Oct-1999 3,205.68
31371 HU49 6.500%09/012006 DD 09101/ 01-0U-1999 -3,139.06
PD 66.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,205.68 FNMA POOL80252703 01.Oc1.1999 3,205.68
31371HU48 6.500%09/012006 DD 08/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00
FC 25.Oc1-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-00-1999 6,24822
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Oc1-1999 -6,248.22
PD 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 I5-Oct-1999 6,248.22
3935052Y7 6290%10/152013 DO 0826/9 15.Oct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Oct-1999 11,409.40
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/199 15.0ct-1999 -11,408.40
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15.Oc1.1999 11,408.40
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/15/9 15.Oct-1999 0.00
FC 15-Oct-1999 0.00
MATURITIES
09-Nov.1999 10.07.55 EcecWhrc Workberch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11800,000.00 IBM DISC 04-Oct-1999 1,7%,542.00
44922BX45 10/04/1999 04-Oa-1999 -1,796,542.00
MT 04-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 04-Oct-1999 13,944,560.00
74271SX42 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 -13,944,560.00
MT 04-0ct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Oct-1999 899,061.25
313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 899,061.25
MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,000.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 05-Oct-1999 12,976,946.66
36959JX57 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 42,976,946.66
MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 05-Oct-1999 1,199,584.00
42824KX55 10/05/1999 05-On-1999 -1.198,584.00
MT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-0ct-1999 894,435.00
36959JX65 10/06/1999 06-Oct-1999 -894,435.00
MT 06-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 08-OU-1999 299,650.00
31358SMSI MAT 10/09/1999 08-Oct-1999 -299,650.00
MT 08-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Now1999 10:07:55 Ececurin Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 12-Oct-1999 299,834.67
313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 12-0ct-1999 -299,934.67
MT 12-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 19.Od-1999 499,712.78
313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 19.0d-1999 -499.712.78
MT 19.0d-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 IBM DISC 21.Oct-1999 996,297.00
44922BXMS 10/21/1999 21-Oct-1999 -896,297.00
MT 21.0d-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 22-Oct-1999 5.191.366.67
313384NG0 MAT 1022119" 22-Oc1-1999 -5,181,366.67
MT 22.0d-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 25-Ou-1999 399,497.78
313588NK7 MAT 1025/99 25-0d-1999 -398,497.78
MT 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-0d-1999 6,969,200.00
02581SXT3 1027/1999 27-Od-1999 -6,969,200.00
MT 27-Od-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 15.Oct-1999 500,000.00
171205AT4 13.250%10/15/1999 15-Oct-1999 -529,010.00
MT IS-Oct-1999 .29,010.00
09-Noo-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 20-Oct-1999 900,000.00
31808CBQ4 6.190%1020/1999 DD 102M 20-Oct-1999 -901,167.30
MT 20-Oct-1999 -1,167.30
INTEREST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-Oct-1999 0.04
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-Oct-1999 0.50
996087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 01-Oct-1999 79,697.50
59018SXP4 6.375%10/01/2001 DO 10/03/9 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-0ct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 01-Ott-1999 28,125.00
37042M702 6.250%011112000 DO 01/1 IN 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Oct-1999 442.38
996085247 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-0ct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:07:55 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-0cb1999 37,719.64
996095247 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 01-0c1-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 IBM DISC 04-0ct-1999 3,458.00
44922BX45 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 04-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 04-Oct-1999 55,440.00
74271SX42 10/04/1999 04-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 04-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Oct-1999 1,939.75
313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 05-Oct-1999 23,053.34
36959JX57 10/05/1999 05-Oc1-1999 0.00
IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 05-Oct-1999 1,416.00
42824KX55 10/05/1999 05-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 05-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 06-Oct-1999 5,565.00
36959JX65 10/06/1999 06-OM-1999 0.00
IT 06-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Now 1999 1207.55 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Oa-1999 175,500.00
638581DE6 5.850%04/07/2000 DD 04/07/9 07-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 07-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 08-Oct-1999 350.00
31358SMSI MAT 10/08/1999 08-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 08-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 12-Oct-1999 165.33
313588MW2 MAT 10/12/1999 12-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 12-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 15-00-1999 33,125.00
171205AT4 13.250°A 10/15/1999 15-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 15-0n-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-00-1999 67,500.00
073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 IS-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN BTR 00299 15-Oct-1999 55,813.32
61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 15-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 15-0M-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
214,369.67 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 15-Oct-1999 55,325.95
3128DDQ55 7.000'/o 02/012003 DD 02/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT I5-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nov-1999 10:07.55 Executive Workbench
Q F ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
44,618.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15.Oct-1999 3.490.90
3133T02135 5.900%06/15/2017 01.Od-1999 0.00
IT IS-Oct-1999 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,248.22 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-0n-1999 2,597.28
3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 08/2619 15.Oc1-1999 0.00
IT 15-OU-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,408.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C IS-0ct-1999 519.20
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/15/9 15-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 15-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15.Oc1-1999 22.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15.Oc1-I999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,183.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15.Oct-1999 16,959.18
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15.0U-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 18-Ott-1999 4,321.88
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DD 05/181 18-Ou-1999 0.00
IT I8-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,697.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 I84)c1.1999 11,697.01
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/0119 01.Oct-1999 0.00
IT 18-Oc1-1999 0.00
094Now1999 10:07:55 Eeemtiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGES 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 19-Oct-1999 287.22
313396NDI MAT 10/19/1999 19-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 19-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 8TR006 20-Oct-1999 18,783.35
17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 20-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 20-Oa-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
30,017.10 GNMA It POOL#0080023 20.Oa-1999 8,578.34
36225CAZ9 6.125%12/20/2026 DO 12/01/ 01-Ott-1999 0.00
IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 20-Oct-1999 5,416.25
31808CBQ4 6.190%10/20/1999 DO 10/20/9 20-Oa-1999 0.00
IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
29,006.64 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 20-Oct-1999 11,825.75
36225CC20 6.375%0620/2027 DO 06/011 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 20-Oct-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Oct-1999 3,70100
44922BXM5 10/21/1999 21-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 21-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 22-Oct-1999 18,633.33
313384NGO MAT 1022/1999 22-Ga-1999 0.00
IT 22-Oct-1999 0.00
09-,V o-1999 10:07.55 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25�Oct-1999 10,933.33
3133TDPV2 6.5009's09/252018 25-S«1999 0.00
IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 25-Oct-1999 1,502.22
313598NKI MAT 1025/99 25-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3.205.68 FNMA POOLN0252703 25-Oct-1999 5,395.40
31371HU48 6.5001/609/012006DD08/OI/ 01-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 25-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-Oct-1999 30,900.00
02581SXT3 1027/1999 27-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 27-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 8TR 00246 28.Oct-1999 42,712.92
42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/ 28-Oct-1999 0.00
IT 28-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM PUS IN'I AD3 29-Oct-1999 -128.50
990000P34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 29-Oc1-1999 0.00
CW 29-Oct-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-00-1999 25,500.00
9128272M3 3.375%0111512007 DO 011151 0.00
CD 29-Oct-1999 0.00
09-Nm-1999 10:07:55 &x ,wl. Wark&en h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-OCT-1999-31-OCT-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST7
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Oct-1999 17,600.D0
9128273A8 3.623%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 0.00
CD 29-Oct-1999 0.00
09-NowI999 10:07.55 aze wsce Workbench
FAHR COMMITTEE Mee8n913 a To ea.ofDlr.
11/10/98 12/17/99
AGENDA REPORT Rm Number 1p N11e'bef
FMR99-83 14fd)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the 1999-00 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter
ended September 30, 1999.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the District's First Quarter Financial and
Operational Report for the period ended September 30, 1999. This report is a
consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District
through the first quarter of the 1999-00 fiscal year.
Contained within the First Quarter Financial Report and Operational Report are budget
summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also
contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and
workplan milestones identified in the 1999-00 Approved Budget and Strategic Goals
Workplan.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 27.29 percent, or$12,009,000 of
the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been expended. Net costs
have increased 14.94 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily
due to the unexpected cost of the Huntington Beach Closure totaling $750,800.
Excluding the Huntington Beach Closure cost, net joint operating expenses would be at
25.6 percent of budget.
The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1999 is $544.26 based on flows of
23,236.07 million gallons. This is $62.02, or 12.9 percent above the budgeted cost per
million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due in part to expenditures being slightly
high at 27.29 percent, but mostly due to the shortfall in flows which are 4.06 percent
below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. Excluding the Huntington
Beach Closure cost would reduce the cost per million gallons to $510.23, or 5.8 percent
above budget.
H My EbHpeM+WaN�qMa flepA\t Wd BmN�QaMa flepWlf I Whrn 1 (GI.Ox
flmW vum Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
1. 1999-00 Financial and Operational Report for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1999
µ`ry Ap Rg 11M BW Aqe eN h1110]JM1m 1y0 di
RwuE. eaBve Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE MeebngDMe ToXElds.
11110/99 11/17/99
AGENDA REPORT I"1%lumWr IMMNumbe
FAHR99-85 14(eI
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Originator: Lisa Tomko, Manager, Human Resources
SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY
RESOLUTION 98-33
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-22, Amending Policies Numbers B30.00,
C10.00, C20.00, C30.00, C150.00, D50.00, D60.00, D90.00 and F80.00 of
Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Adding Policies Numbers C20.10 and
C170.00 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 98-33; Ratifying any Additional
Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33; and Ratifying that All
Future Amendments to Exhibit A of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be Made by
Resolution re Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for
Classification, Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, Policies and
Procedures Governing District Employment.
SUMMARY
Human Resources policies and procedures are amended two times each
calendar year. The attached policies are routine updates to maintain consistent
language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) or to explain
procedures more clearly.
Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in
gray; deleted language is lined through.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
Hw.n mWew, Aqw RepeMH Memm W.a•Rq 1110. 14(e)Ex
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION a
Policy Number From To Reason
And Subject For Change
C10.00-Classifications,Positions, Policy changed to reflect Revision of 'Exhibit A- Changes per the SPMT
Salary Ranges and Wages Pay for Performance Salary Ranges'and Negobatlons.
Ment Matrix for Exempt clarification of pay for
Employees. performance per the SPLIT
Negotiations.
C20.00-Compensation Polkyremainsthe Change in wording to Clarification of salary
fame. Sections 5.6.3.2 and adjustments for
5.6.4.3 probationary employees.
C30.00-Appraisal of Performance 4.3 Professional, 4.3 Professional, Remove the words*or
Supervisory, Supervisory,Management mind bonus.
Management and EMT and EMT employees will
employees will receive a receive a performance
performance appraisal appraisal prior to any
Prior to any salary salary adjustment,
adjustment or merit
bonus.
D60.00-Insurance Polley Policy remains the Additional language under To clarify that the District
same. 5.5 Dental and 6.1 provides Insurance for 0s
Exceptions to exclude non employees only and does
employees. not include Independent
contractors.
D60.00-Benefits Option Plan(BOP) 5.1 Professional Professional employees Provision negotiated In the
employees will receive will receive$1,000 SPMT contract.
9750 annually. annually. Clarity the past practice for
6.1 Add language probationary employees.
regarding employees on
probation.
090-00-Tultion Reknbursement Tuition Assistance Tuition Reimbursement Replaces Tuillon
Pr ram Program Assistanu Polio
F90.00-Workplace Violence and Workplace Violence Workplace Violence and Include the Mou language
Weapons Polley Pdl,
y. Weapons Policy. regarding weapons I i the
policy.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Policy C10.00 Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages
2. Policy C20.00 Compensation
3. Policy C30.00 Appraisal of Performance
4. Policy D50.00 Insurance
5. Policy D60.00 Benefits Option Plan
6. Policy D90.00 Tuition Reimbursement Program
7. Policy F80.00 Workplace Violence and Weapons Policy
HM.y.EUYawWlaoaN AawW RepoftnM anN AWda Ri xWl 10Bexn Net kov
Page 2
Orange County Policy Number: C10.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17,1999
Subject: CLASSIFICATIONS, Supersedes: December 9, 1998
POSITIONS, SALARY
RANGES AND WAGES
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
use in the administration of the Districts'compensation programs.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 All Districts'employees.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
Classifications are groups of positions, regardless of location,which are alike enough in
duties and responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title, to be given the same
pay scale under similar conditions,and to require substantially the same qualifications.
Salary Ranges are the range of pay rates,from minimum to maximum, set for a pay
grade or class.
4.0 POLICY
4.1 The Districts'Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage
and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that aNewssistriets
management employees to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain
present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth
and personal merit. Every position is assigned to a salary grade based upon the
duties and responsibilities of that position and the comparative market value of
that job function. Comparisons are most generally made with organizations of
similar size and engaged in similar occupational pursuits within the geographic
area of potential recruitment. The basic salary ranges are set forth on Exhibit A.
4.2 Wage nA' to f...employees in!he Co.... , e Management Managem..nPFAfPAAiAAA1 AFOUPS Feseive annual wage aoustments. The amount ef the wage
ei�ined by the Boards and 6 distftuted equally Is all
least meet expsetal eAs to keep employees at MaFkal.
Page
4.3 Employees are awarded merit increases based upon their performance,as
determined by the performance evaluation program, and the position of their
salary within the pay range. The Merit Matrix is the tool used to determine the
actual amount of merit Increase. In addition, employees in the Supervisory and
Professional Group who at least meet expectations receive annual Cost of Living
Adjustments(COLA)to keep employees'salaries at market.The amount of the
COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI,All-Urban Consumers-LA,
Riverside,Orange County)for the month of May and is distributed as a base-
building increase.
4.4 Employees in the Executive Management and Management Groups are awarded
merit increases based upon their performance,as determined by the performance
evaluation program,and the position of their salary relative to the external market.
External market rates are determined through the use of salary surveys.The merit
increase may be distributed as base building or non-base building.
4.5 The General Manager is authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to
occupy budgeted positions and to exercise supervision over all persons in
accordance with the provisions of this policy and to terminate,for cause,the
employment of any regular full time employee employed under these provisions. All
other employees,e.g.,probationary, part-time,and limited term/temporary and
contract may be terminated at the Districts'sole discretion.
4.6 The General Manager is also authorized to employ Executive Management
employees on an"at-will"basis. Such status shall be memorialized by a written
agreement signed by the General Manager and the Executive Manager,
acknowledging that the Executive Manager shall serve at the pleasure of the General
Manager. Any Executive Management employee so employed on the date of
adoption of this policy,who has not signed an"at-will"agreement may voluntarily
elect to do so, but may not be required to do so.
4.7 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this policy or any prior Board action,the
General Manager is authorized to periodically adjust the rate of compensation of
Executive Management employees who have signed"at-will"agreements so long as
no adjustment exceeds the compensation permitted by the applicable salary range
established by the Joint Boards of Directors.
4.8 Employees who believe their position is not property classified may request e
classification study of their position through their Department Head. Classification
studies shall only be conducted twice a year in November and May.
4.8.1 Classification study requests should be submitted to Human Resources
no later than October I&for the November cycle and no later than April
1 e for the May cycle.
4.8.2 All classification study findings regarding existing classifications are
subject to approval by the General Manager;findings recommending
new job classification titles or the reclassification of an existing
classification to a different pay range are subject to approval by the
Districts'Boards of Directors.
Page 2
4.9 The D striate aFe IfeveMed by!he aFevs sAs of lhA FAHAFal Fair LaleAF Stan daPds As!,
"FLSA", and have, in aGGGFdamse with I,after study and evalual on of lhe suiies an
w thin the Exe-utive Management, Management, Supervisory and Profess anal
An the PF8V 6 ORS at the rl=SA-.
4.10 The District shall provide an investment incentive salary to the employees within
the classifications and in the amounts, as set forth in Section 4.8.1,which amounts
are based on a percentage of salary equal to the amount previously paid to
designated employees pursuant to District Policy No.C150.00, Section 7.1, effective
October 22, 1997, and repealed April 22, 1998.
4.10.1 The percentage of base salary amounts are as follows:
Executive management—6%(up to a maximum IRS amount)
Division management and supervisor—4%
Professional and confidential—3%
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Employees on the Five-Step Pay Plan
5.1.1 New Employees. Employees who successfully complete their Initial
Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment
are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step
(5.5%)effective on the first day of the pay period following completion of
the Initial Probationary Period. The Salary Review date for subsequent
annual reviews is established on the first day of a pay period following 26
weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of probation.
5.1.2 Annual Merit Increase. Employees who are not at the top of the salary
range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual
salary adjustment of up to one step(5.59/6)on their Salary Review date,
provided their performance fully meets expectations.
5.1.3 Promotional Increase. Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a
promotional increase of 5.5%,or to the base of the new range,
whichever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an
employee has not successfully completed their Promotional Probationary
Period on their Salary Review date,any adjustment resulting from that
annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period
is completed.
5.2 Executive Management, Management,Supervisory and Professional Group
Employees
5.2.1 New Employees. Employees who are hired into Executive Management,
Management, Supervisory and Professional Group positions with
"exempt"salary ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum
of the range unless their level of background,expertise or prior earnings
result in a requirement for a salary greaterthan the minimum.The
determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships
to other employees in the same classification and to employees
supervised, if any.
Page 3
5.2.1.1 Employees in"exempt range classifications serve a
Probationary Period of six months and receive a
comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that
period. Employees who successfully conclude their
probation are eligible for a salary adjustment the subsequent
July in accordance with the provisions of the Management
Performance Review Program established by separate
action of the Boards of Directors as amended from time to
time.
5.2.2 Annual Management Performance Review Procram. An annual
performance review is completed for all employees in"exempt" range
classifications in accordance with the provisions of the performance
evaluation Program. Performance based salary adjustments occur on the
first day of the first pay period in July,and may will be prorated based
upon the date of hire or promotion,
If the
employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the
performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the following July
and will be prorated based on date of hire or promotion.
5.2.3 Promotional Increases. Employees in"exempt"range classifications
who earn promotions to a new"exempt" range classification will normally
be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate
with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings,and in an
appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification
and to employees supervised.The new salary will normally represent an
increase of at least 5.5 percent. Employees in"exempt"range
classifications are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of
the Promotional Probationary Period. ff the employee's probaton period
has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary
adjustment is deferred until suel;time as PFOW OR is SUGG866fUlly
seasladed until the following July and will be prorated based on date of
promotion.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 Sections 5.2.1,5.2.2 and 5.2.3 do not apply to"at-will' Executive Management
Employees.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
8.1 Exhibit A
8.2 Fair Labor Standards Act
Page 4
ATTACHMENT "A"
m Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employed Group
Operations and Maintenance(501(
Pey
Bane minimum Maximum Classifications IFLSA Statue
2015 44,571 55.504 Lead Electrical Technician Non-Exempt
2015 44,571 55.504 Lead Instrumentation Technician Non-Exempt
2014 42,207 52,549 Electrical Technician ll Non-Exempt
2014 42.207 52,549 Instrumentation Technician 11 Non-Exempt
2013 40.775 50,776 Lead Mechanic Non-Exampt
2013 40.775 50.776 Pump Power Operator Non-Exempt
2013 40,775 50,776 Senior Plant Operator Non-Exempt
2012 41.812 52.060 Lead Collection Facilities Woduu Nan-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Machinist Non-Exempt
2011 39.304 48,949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt
2011 39,304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt
2010 39,040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt
2009 37.979 47,285 Builder Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Electrical Technician l Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47.285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt
2008 37.737 46,973 Plant Operator Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Electrical Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42.969 Instrumentation Maintenance Worker Non-Exampt
2007 34.505 42.969 Painter Non-Exempt
2007 34.605 42,969 Senior Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Nan-Exempt
2006 33,590 41.812 Mechanic Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39.040 Collection Facilities Worker 11 Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39,040 Mainumance Worker Non-Exempt
2004 30,938 38.509 Operator In Training Non-Exempt
2003 29,875 37.207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt
2002 29,490 36.700 Control Center Clark Nan-Exampl
2001 24,184 30.093 Cdlection Facilities Worker I Nan-Exempt
2000 22.882 28,502 Helper Nan-Exempt
rer Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Administrative and Clerical
Exhibit A
Pay _
Pan a Minimum Maximum Classllicallons PLSA Status
1019 44,660 55,628 Infanaation Services Technician III Non-Exempt
1017 41,714 51.940 Financial Technician Non Exempt
1015 40,806 50.540 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt
1013 38.436 47,840 Senior Storeskeeper Non-Exempt
1012 38,933 48,476 Adminlstralive Assistant Non-Exempt
1011 37,906 47,189 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt
1011 37,906 47.189 Information Services Technician ll Non-Exempt
1008 34,382 42,800 Information Services Technician l Non-Exempt
1007 33,444 41,644 Secretary Non-Exempt
1004 31,878 39,601 Senior Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
1004 31,878 39,691 Senior Office Aide Nan-Exempt
1003 31,660 39,424 Storeskeeper Non-Exempt
1002 29,370 36,556 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
1002 29,370 36,556 Office Me Non-Exempt
1002 29,370 36,556 Office Specialist Non-Exempt
1001 26,308 32,770 Office Technician Non Exempt
904 14,468 30,164 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt
903 14,468 24,812 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt
m Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Confidential
Pay
Range Mlnlmum Mexlmum Classllleetlone FLSA Sfatua
1027 42.551 52.978 Executive Assistant ll No.-Exempt
1012 38,933 48,476 Executive Assistant l Non-Exempt
1012 38,933 48,476 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt
ac Orange County Sanitation Dlsfrlct
Classifications By Employee Group
Executive Management
Pey,
Ran a Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Statue
E27 $154.596 $154.596 General Manager Exempt
E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt
E19 S87,180 $139.980 Director of Engineering Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Operations B Maintenance Exempt
E19 $87.180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of Technical Services Exempt
E18 S85,992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt
Ei8 S85,992 $139,464 Director of Information Technology Exempt
E17 $75.876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Directorol Communications Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Engineering
Pay
Bane Minimum Maximum Classifications RSA Status
1025 49,866 62A90 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt
1023 47,526 59,174 Engineering Associate Non-Exampt
102D 45,621 56,766 Canstruction Inspector Non-Exempt
1015 40,606 5Q540 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt
1009 36,893 45.935 Engineering Aide 11 Nan-Exempt
1006 33,228 41,355 Engineering Aide I Nun-Exempt
Orange County Sensation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Management
Pry
Rene Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA States
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt
E16 M.688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt
E16 ST/1668 $109,812 Emtronmental Compliance&Monitoring Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Laboratory Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt
E15 573,956 $104.616 Controller Exempt
E15 $73,956 $104,616 Financial Manager Exempt
E15 $73,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt
E15 $73,956 $104.616 Contracts&Purchasing Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 SafetWEmergency Response Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Maintenance Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Human Resources Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Operations Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technology Manager Exempt
nnmee Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Professional
I � I
flan Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
E14 $70.380 $99,600 Chief Scientist Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Assistant to Me General Manager Exempt
E13 $97.128 $94,932 Senior Engineer Exempt
E12 M948 $90.468 Senior Scientist Exempt
E12 $63,948 $90.468 Senior Regulatory Specielud Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Engineer Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt
E10 557,852 $81,948 Secretary to the Board of Directors Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.166 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt
E9 555212 $78.156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Project Specialist Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt
E9 $55,212 578,156 Scientist Exempt
E9 $55212 MASS Principal A=untant Exempt
E9 $56212 $MISS Principal Flnandal Analyst Exempt
E9 $55212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt
ES 552,500 $74,292 Associate Engineer III Exempt
E8 552,500 $74,292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt
E8 552,500 $74,292 Safety$Emergency Response Specialist Exempt
E7 M.064 $70.848 Programmer Analyst Exempt
E7 $60.064 $70,848 Computer Hardware Specialist Non-Exempt
E7 550,064 570,1t48 Telecommunications Specialist Non-Exempt
E7 550,064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt
E7 $50.064 $70.848 Contracts Administrator Exempt
E6 547,640 $67.392 Principal Laboratory 8 Research Analyst Exempt
Ell 547,640 $67.392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt
E5 545.396 $64.212 Associate Engineer ll Exempt
E5 545.396 $64.212 Senior Accountant Exempt
ES 545.396 $64.212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt
E5 $45.396 564,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt
ES 545,396 $64,212 Senior Environmental Specialist Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61,236 Safely Reprasentaave Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61.236 Programmer Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61.236 Senior Buyer Exempt
E3 $41.136 $58.260 Associate Engineer l Exempt
E2 539.252 $55,488 Contracts Specialist Exempt
El $37.284 $52.9D8 Accountant Exempt
El $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt
E1 $37284 552,90I Financial Analyst Exempt
E1 $37,284 $52.908 Management Analyst Exempt
rm Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Supervlsory
Pey
Ben a Minimum Maximum Classification FLEA SfaNa
E14 $70,380 $99.600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt
E12 $63,948 $90.468 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt
Ell 960.82E $86.064 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt
Ell $6g628 $86.064 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
Ell 661 $66.064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86.064 Contracts$Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
E9 $65,212 $78,156 Operations Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78,156 Source Control Supevsor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,166 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt
rm Orange County Sanitation District
Clauglwtlons By Employee Group
Technical Services
pay
LRenge Minimum Maximum CbulOeations FLSA Sbtus
1016 43,476 54,134 Environmental Specialist ll Non-Exempt
1016 43,476 54,134 Source Control Inspector ll Non-Exempt
1016 43,476 54,130 Senior Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
1010 37,134 46,249 Environmental Specialist l No Exempt
1010 37,134 46,249 Laboratory Analyst Nor1-Exempt
1010 37.134 46.249 Source Control Inspector I Non-Exempt
1005 32,552 40,533 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
"Non-Regular"Part Time
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Btatus
g05 13,720 33,280 Intern Non-Exampt
Orange County Policy Number: C20.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17, 1999
Subject: COMPENSATION Supersedes: October 22, 1997
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish and maintain uniform compensation
standards for all Districts'employees.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 This policy applies to all Districts'employees, as specified herein.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
4.0 POLICY
4.1 It is the policy of the Districts to apply uniform compensation standards.The
Districts'Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and
benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows Districts'
management to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present
employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and
personal merit.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Exempt Employees
5.1.1 Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within the
salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed.
5.2 Non-exempt Employees
5.2.1 Non-exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate within
the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are
employed.
Page 1
5.3 New Employees
5.3.1 New employees in classifications within employee bargaining units other
than the Professional, Supervisory, Executive Management and
Management Groups who successfully complete their Probationary
Period and are recommended for continued employment as regular
employees,are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to
one step (5.5%).
5.3.1.1 This adjustment is effective on the first day of the pay period that
follows the date of completion of the Probationary Period
(normally 26 weeks).The salary review date for subsequent
annual reviews is the first day of the first pay period following 26
weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of
probation.
5.3.1.2 The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is the
first day of that pay period following the date when probation was
successfully completed.
5.4 Reviews
5.4.1 An employee in a group other than Professional,Supervisory and
Executive Management and Management who is not at the top of the
salary range for their position is eligible for consideration of an annual
salary adjustment of up to one step(5.50/6)on their Salary Review date,
provided their performance satisfactorily meets expectations.
5.4.1.1 Annual performance reviews shall be completed on a fomx
provided by the Director of Human Resources.
5.5 Promotions
5.5.1 An employee who eams a promotion is entitled to a promotional increase
of at least 5.5%, or to the base of the new range,which ever is greater,
upon the effective date of the promotion.
5.5.1.1 If an employee has not successfully completed the promotional
probationary period on their salary review date,any adjustment
resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time
as the probationary period is completed.
5.5.1.2 A new salary review date is established for any promotion to a
classification not in the Professional,Supervisory, Executive
Management and Management Group.
5.6 E-Range Classifications
5.6.1 An employee hired into Professional, Supervisory, Executive
Management and Management Group positions with"exempt"salary
ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range
unless their level of background,expertise or prior earnings indicates a
need for a salary greater than the minimum.
Page 2
5.6.1.1 The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider
the relationship of the employee's proposed salary to that of
other employees in the same classification and to employees
supervised,it any.
5.6.2 Except for"at-wilr Executive Management employees,employees in
"exempt"range classifications serve a Probationary Period of six months
and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that
period unless otherwise provided in an individual, written employment
agreement.
5.6.2.1 An employee who successfully completes probation is eligible for
a salary adjustment according to the provisions of the
Management Performance Review Program which is in force at
the time of the review.
5.6.3 An annual performance review is completed for all employees in
"exempt" range classifications according to the provisions of the
Management Performance Review Program.
5.6.3.1 Performance-based salary adjustments for these employees
occur on the first day of the first pay period in July.
5.6.3.2 Such adjustmepAs may be PFBrated based an!he dale 8f hiFe,
PFGMOti8R, GF last salary ssFPAAA in those +n,t,R,,q where the
If the
employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the
performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the
following July and will be prorated based on date of hire or
promotion.
5.6.4 An employee in"exempt" range classifications who is promoted to a new
"exempt"range classification will normally be offered a salary below the
midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training
and expertise, prior earnings.
5.6.4.1 The promoted employee's salary should be in an appropriate
relationship to other employees in the same classification and to
employees supervised.
5.6.4.2 The new salary will normally represent an increase of least 5.5
percent,
slaseHisatien.
5.6.4.3
If the
employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the
performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the
following July and will be prorated based on date of promotion.
5.6.4.4 This section does not apply to"at-will"Executive Management
employees.
Page 3
1
5.7 Y-Rating
5.7.1 If the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a lower
paid classification as a result of a classification study,the salary of the of
the employee in that position shall remain unchanged(Y-rated)
according to the following table:
Years of Semi ea Term of If-
0-3 One Year
4-5 Two Years
6- 10 Three Years
11 -20 Four Years
21 or More Five Years
5.7.2 The Y-rate remains in effect until the salary range for the new
classification equals or exceeds the employee's Y-rated salary,or until
the term of the Y-rate expires.
5.7.2.1 If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls within the
range of the new classification,the employee shall be placed on
the step of the new range nearest but not more than the Y-rated
salary.
5.7.2.2 Employees become eligible for merit increases and range
adjustments when the Y-rate is no longer in effect.
5.7.2.3 An employee who requests a voluntary reduction is not entitled
to a Y-rate.
5.7.2.4 This section does not apply to"at-will" Executive Management
employees.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 The General Manager is authorized to offer up to three(3) weeks of annual paid
vacation to any prospective Executive Management employee if, in the judgment
of the General Manager, such offer is necessary to attract the most qualified
candidate.
6.1.1 The General Manager shall annually report all such appointments to the
Board Subcommittee having responsibility for personnel matters.
6.1.2 Salary offers beyond the midpoint of a range require prior approval by
the General Manager.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
6.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
(Attach salary range exhibits when available)
Page 4
Orange County Policy Number: C30.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: November 17, 1999
Subject: APPRAISAL OF Supersedes: October 22, 1997
PERFORMANCE
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
the appraisal of employee performance.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
1.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational
unit.
2.0 DEFINITIONS
3.0 POLICY
3.1 It is the Districts'policy and the Districts' management philosophy that
establishing an effective level of communication that offers consistent and
continuing feedback on performance expectations and achievements will provide
an environment in which our employees can perform to the best of their abilities.
A performance appraisal program has been developed to provide a structure that
will support the accomplishment of that goal. Important principles of the program
include:
3.1.1 The Districts'overall mission is enhanced by establishing a connection
between that mission and individual employees' responsibilities and
objectives.
3.1.2 Recognizing employee strengths and identifying areas that may
represent opportunities for improvement will affect current performance
as well as enhance career potential.
3.1.3 Every individual has primary responsibility for their own performance and
development.
3.1.4 The key role of the supervisor is to support an employee's efforts to
maximize their own contribution and potential.
Page 1
4.0 PROCEDURE
4.1 New employees will receive a performance appraisal at the close of their initial
probationary period to determine their suitability for continued employment with
the Districts. An evaluation should also occur midway through the probationary
period to ensure that performance expectations have been properly
communicated and established. This will also offer an opportunity for both the
employee and the supervisor to more effectively evaluate the desirability of
continuing the employment relationship.
4.2 Employees who earn promotions should similarly receive a performance
appraisal at the conclusion of the promotional probationary period.
4.3 An annual performance appraisal will be completed with each employee prior to
their anniversary date. Professional,Supervisory, Management and Executive
Management employees will receive a performance appraisal prior to any salary
adjustment er-meAR4eans.
5.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
6.1 Supervisors and managers will be notified by the Human Resources Department
of all evaluations that must be completed at least 45 days in advance of the due
dale.
7.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
Page 2
Orange County Policy Number: D50.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999
Subject: INSURANCE Supersedes: May 13, 1998
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
use in the administration of the District's insurance benefits program.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 All District employees.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
4.0 POLICY
4.1 The District shall provide medical-health insurance coverage through both health
maintenance organizations and an indemnity type group health plan, life
insurance, and disability insurance for the benefit of full-time employees.
4.2 All insurance coverage shall become effective on the first day of the month
following one full month of employment.An open enrollment period shall be held
annually in the month of June.
5.0 PLANS-PROGRAMS
5.1 Medical. The District shall contribute 100%of employee only premiums for the
medical health plans and shall contribute 80%of the employee+1 dependent
and full family premiums. Any change in insurance rates shall be shared equally
in same ratio as premiums are currently paid by the District and employees.
Before the renewal of any District's sponsored health insurance plan,the parties
agree to meet and confer as to the plan.
5.1.1 Any change In Insurance rates caused by a carrier after 11-25-96 are
subject to the applicable provisions of the various Memoranda of
Understanding approved by the Boards of Directors.
Page 1
5.2 Life. The District provides term life Insurance coverage for most employees. The
District shall pay the full premium for term life insurance as established for each
employee covered under a Memorandum of Understanding or as otherwise
agreed upon.
5.3 Short Term Disabilitv. The District shall provide a non-work related, short-term
disability indemnity plan that pays up to a maximum of$336 per week for up to
26 weeks following a fourteen calendar day waiting period. Employees may
request to receive prorated sick leave,personal leave or vacation pay to
supplement their short term disability payments in an amount such that the sum
of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay.
5.4 Long-Tenn Disabilitv. The District offers,at the employee's expense, a non-work
related, long-term disability indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of the employee's
rate of pay in effect at the time of such disability, not to exceed$5,000 per
month,following a 90-day wailing period of continuous disability. The District
provides this coverage at the District's expense after five years of employment.
5.5 Dental. The District provides a dental plan for regular,full-time employees and
their eligible dependents at no cost for employee-only coverage and$9.00 per
month for full family coverage.
employee only and$75 54 fa.full fam Di a 6 the nt r
5.5 Visi n. The District shall provide a vision insurance plan for regular,full-time
employees and their eligible dependents.
5.6 Retirino Employees. The District shall pay,for employees hired prior to July 1,
1988,two and one-half months'premium for each year of continuous service of a
retiring employee towards the premium costs of coverage for the employee and
eligible dependents under the District's medical plan.
5.6.1 The District shall enter into an agreement with the Orange County
Employee Retirement System (OCERS)to implement the retiree medical
health premium offset program established by the County of Orange
wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by$10 per month for
every year of service up to a maximum of 25 years or$250 per month.
5.7 Workers Compensation Insurance. The District's Workers Compensation
program is self-funded and administered by a third party administrator. Workers'
Compensation insurance provides coverage for injuries arising out of
employment with the District and occurring in the course of employment.
5.8 Reimbursement Account. Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code permits
employees to use pretax dollars to pay for their portion of the cost of benefits
under the plan through salary redirection arrangements.The available options
are summarized below. For complete information regarding Flexible Spending
Accounts employees must refer to the plan booklet available in the Human
Resources Department. Participation in this Program does not affect the
District's contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement System. The
amount deducted shall then be repaid to the employee through the District's
provided Reimbursement Program.
Page 2
5.8.1 Group Insurance Premium.Group insurance premiums that are paid by
salary redirection can be made on a pretax basis.
5.8.2 Medical Care Reimbursement Account.The purpose of this account is to
provide a method through which an employee can accumulate pretax
funds in a Medical Care Reimbursement Account for the purposes of
reimbursing the employee for payment of health care costs not otherwise
covered by the health and medical insurance.
5.8.3 Dependent Care Assistance Account.The purpose of this account is to
provide a method through which an employee can accumulate pretax
funds in a Dependent Care Assistance Account for the purposes of
reimbursing the employee for child care expenses or day care for a
disabled dependent.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 Contract workers are not entitled to and are ineligible to join or participate in any
benefit plans offered to those individuals listed on OCSD's payroll as regular
employees.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
7.1 No combination of disability or sick leave pay shall result in more than an
employee's regular rate of pay. Employees may not receive short-term and long-
term disability benefits at the same time. An employee who is otherwise not
eligible for District paid long-term disability may purchase such coverage at their
own expense.
7.2 In the event the District adds additional optional insurance plans, the District's
share of the premium shall be the same as for existing plans as set forth above.
In the event the District changes underwriters for existing insurance plans,the
District's share of the premium shall be the same as for existing insurance plans
as set forth above.
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
Page 3
Orange County Policy Number: D60.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999
Subject: BENEFITS OPTION PLAN Supersedes: October 22, 1997
(BOP)
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
administering the Benefits Option Plans(BOP).
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 This policy applies to employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management
and Executive Management Groups.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
The Benefits Option Plan is a provision in the District's policies that provides employees
in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups with
supplemental income that can be used for a variety of purposes as specified herein.
4.0 POLICY
4.1 It is the District's policy to allow employees in the Professional, Supervisory,
Management and Executive Management groups to participate in the BOP in
accordance with this policy.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive
Management group who have successfully completed their probationary period
are entitled to participate in the BOP. Under the provisions of the BOP,
Professional employees will receive$750$1,000 annually, and Supervisors,
Management and Executive Management employees will receive$1250 annually
to offset the cost of professional licenses,memberships,subscriptions,tuition
reimbursement and medical expenses-The Benefits Option Plan will be
distributed semi-annually in January and July of each year.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 Employees who are within their initial six-month probationary period are not
eligible for BOP.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
Policy Number: D90.00
b
Orange County Effective Date: October 22, 1997
Sanitation District
^Mf XV`
Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes:Tuition Assistance
PROGRAM
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
This program is designed to encourage self-development of District employees by
providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational
courses at accredited colleges, universities,or other approved institutions provided that
such courses are primarily for the purpose of:
• Increasing capabilities in their present positions within the District
• Preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to
advance within the District
• Updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and
beneficial to the District
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
This policy applies to all District's regular,full-time employees.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1 Qualifying Employees: regular,full-time employees who have completed their
initial probationary period.
3.2 Regular Full-time Employees:qualifying employees who regularly work an 80-
hour, biweekly pay period.
3.3 Tuition Reimbursement: a reimbursement program of eligible expense for
qualifying employees who attend, on their own time, District-approved courses at
accredited colleges, universities,or other approved institutions of the employees'
choosing.
4.0 POLICY
The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete education courses that
serve the mission and goals of the District at accredited institutions in compliance with
Section 1.0*PURPOSE,"provided that the reimbursement is within the individual
maximum and overall limits of the authorized tuition reimbursement budget.
5.0 REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Employees can be reimbursed for the following:
• Specific,job-related associate, baccalaureate, and graduate degree
programs
Page 1
• Specific,job-related courses through accredited colleges or universities
• Specific,job-related courses offered through an approved institution of study
5.2 When an employee has completed each pre-approved course with a grade of
"C"or better for undergraduate or"B"or better for graduate work, the District will
reimburse the employee the cost of tuition, books,and required fees not to
exceed$5,250 per calendar year.
Examples of eligible and ineligible expenses are:
Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses
• Tuition • Application fees
• Registration fees • Material fees
• Laboratory fees • Travel
• Parking fees • Optional student fees
• Required textbook costs • Doctoral dissertation fees
• Health fees • Masters thesis fees
6.0 PROCEDURE
6.1 Pre-Approval Process
6.1.1 Employee seeking tuition reimbursement:
6.1.1.1 Prior to the start of a course or degree program,submits to the
Education and Training Division for the semester or quarter, a
Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval Application with Sections
1,2 and 3(Manager's Review and Pre-Approval)completed.
Note: Although not required, it m advisable to submit the
completed application prior to registering for the course or
program so that approval can be determined before the
employee incurs any expenses.
6.1.1.2 If seeking pre-approval for courses in a degree program,submit
a list of approved courses prepared by the school and signed
by the employee's advisor at the beginning of the program.
Submit this list with the initial Tuition Reimbursement Pre-
Approval Application.
6.1.2 The Education and Training Division Manager:
6.1.2.1 Reviews the Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval Application.
6.1.2.2 If incomplete, returns the application to the employee with a
Status form indicating the date that the employee must correct
and return the application to the Education and Training
Division.
6.1.2.3 If approved,signs the Tuition Reimbursement Pre-Approval
Application and forwards a copy of the application and a
Tuition Reimbursement Application to the employee.
6.1.2.4 If the application is not approved, returns the application to the
employee with a Status form indicating the reason(s)for
non-approval.
Page 2
6.2 Reimbursement Process
6.2.1 Within 60 calendar days following the end of the course(s),the employee
submits the Tuition Reimbursement Application with Section 1 completed
to the Education and Training Division with the following documents
attached:
• Official record of final grade
• Receipts for tuition and eligible fees paid
• Receipts for books
6.2.2 The Education and Training Division Manager.
6.2.2.1 Reviews the Tuition Reimbursement Application and attached
documentation.
6.2.2.2 If Incomplete, returns the application to the employee with a
Status form indicating the date that the employee must correct
and return the application to the Education and Training
Division.
6.2.2.3 If approved,signs the application and forwards the approved
application to the Accounting Division and a copy to the
employee indicating reimbursement status.
6.2.2.4 If the application is not approved, returns the application to the
employee with a Status forth Indicating the reason(s)for
non-approval.
7.0 EXCEPTIONS
7.1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the
completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made.
7.2 Employees will not be reimbursed for tuition costs covered under Veterans
Administration Programs or other government sponsored programs.
7.3 Reimbursement may be authorized whenever the employee's manager and
Education and Training Division Manager determine that there is substantial
benefit to be derived by the District when an employee takes a course or
program that does not meet the requirements of Section 6.1,for example,
courses for impacted or transitional employees and/or non-credit courses.
8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.1 An employee who receives payments for formal course work through the Tuition
Reimbursement Program will be required to reimburse the District 9 the
employee voluntarily leaves the District's employment within two years of
completing the course work. The General Manager, under unusual
circumstances or on an individual basis, may waive the repayment requirement.
8.2 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee
meets the criteria specified in this policy.
Page 3
9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended. `
9.2 Sections 127 and 132J8 of the Internal Revenue Code.
raged
Orange County Policy Number: F80.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: October 27, 1999
Subject: WORKPLACE VIOLENCE AND Supersedes: December 9, 1998
WEAPONS POLICY
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 To promote a safe work environment for all employees.
1.2 To establish and maintain a workplace that is free from violence,threats of
violence, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior.
1.3 To encourage and foster a workplace that is characterized by respect and the
use of acceptable conflict resolution techniques.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 This policy applies to all District employees, regardless of their organizational
unit, on District property or off site with a District employee. Additionally,all
persons who perform any services for the District, regardless of their employment
status,are covered by this policy.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1 Workplace violence includes threats,violent behavior, harassment, intimidation
and other disruptive behavior, direct, indirect, implied or actual from any person,
and directed toward any person, occurring at a District facility or in connection
with the conduct of District business without regard to location.
4.0 POLICY
4.1 It is the District's policy to provide a safe work environment for its employees.
The District is committed to working with its employees to maintain a workplace
free from violence,threats of violence, harassment, intimidation, and other
disruptive behavior. All employees are responsible for maintaining a safe work
environment.
4.1.1 Violence,threats, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior
in the District's workplace will not be tolerated;furthermore,all reports of
these types of incidents will be seriously reviewed and will be
appropriately resolved.
4.1.2 This policy applies to all incidents involving District employees while they
are on duty, on or off plant sites,and incidents involving non-employees
perpetrating violence against District employees while they are on duty.
4.2 Available conflict resolution techniques, such as problem solving, grievance
procedures and appeals processes,will be used to appropriately resolve conflicts
that arise in our workplace.
4.3 The District strictly prohibits persons from possessing weapons including,but not
limited to,firearms,explosives, and knives,clubs and incendiary devices on
District premises, in District vehicles,in private vehicles parked on District
property,and in the possession of District employees while on duty performing
District related business assignments.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Prohibited Conduct
5.1.1 The commission or threat of an act of workplace violence, harassment,
intimidation,or other disruptive behavior is prohibited. The following
examples of such conduct,while not all-inclusive, provide an indication of
the types of behaviors that are considered unacceptable. An employee
who displaystexhibits prohibited conduct under this policy with regard to
one or more of the following may be subject to disciplinary action, up to
and including termination, after consideration of the employee's past
performance, prior discipline, length of service and work history;
5.1.1.1 Causing physical injury to another person;
5.1.1.2 Making threatening remarks,whether with intent to harm or in
jest;
5.1.1.3 Aggressive, hostile or harassing behavior that creates a
reasonable fear of injury to another person or subjects another
individual to emotional distress;
5.1.1.4 Intentionally damaging employer property or property of another
individual;
5.1.15 Possession of a weapon while on District property or while on
District business;or,
5.1.1.6 Committing acts motivated by,or related to,sexual harassment
or domestic violence.
5.1.1.7 Other acts or threats of violence as determined by the District.
5.1.2 Persons who engage in prohibited conduct may also be subject to legal
action by law enforcement authorities.
5.2 Reporting
5.2.1 If the incident involves an emergency and requires the direct intervention
of public safety personnel (i.e., law enforcement or emergency medical
services),immediately CALL extension 222.
5.2.1.1 Control Center personnel will contact emergency services via
911 and will coordinate the response of public safety personnel.
5.2.2 Any situation involving the commission or threat of violence, harassment,
intimidation,other disruptive behavior, possession of a weapon or any
other potentially dangerous situation must be promptly reported to a
supervisor or the Human Resources Department.
5.3 Risk Reduction Measures
5.3.1 Employees at Risk
5.3.1.1 Employees are expected to exercise good judgement and to
notify their supervisor or the Human Resources Department if a
co-worker,or other person on District property or business,
exhibits behavior that could be a sign of potentially dangerous
situations. Such behavior includes,but is not limited to,the
following:
5.3.1.1.1 Discussing the use of weapons as a means to
perpetrate violence against another or bringing them
to the workplace;
6.3.1.1.2 Displaying overt signs of extreme stress,
resentment, hostility or anger,
5.3.1.1.3 Making threatening statements or remarks;
5.3.1.1.4 Sudden or significant deterioration in performance;
5.3.1.1.5 Displaying irrational or inappropriate behavior.
6.3.2 Hiring
5.3.2.1 The Human Resources Department takes reasonable measures
to conduct background investigations in order to review
candidates'backgrounds and to reduce the risk of hiring
individuals with a history of violent behavior.
5.3.3 Enforcement
5.3.3.1 Threats,threatening conduct, harassment,or any other act of
aggression or violence within the District's work environments
will not be tolerated. All reports of these types of incidents will
be promptly investigated and will be appropriately resolved.
5.3.3.1.1 Any employee determined to have committed such
acts will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and
including termination.
5.3.3.1.2 Non-employees engaged in violent acts on District
premises will be reported to the proper authorities
and fully prosecuted.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 Knives traditionally used as tools and having a blade length of three and one-half
(3'/2)inches or less are only considered weapons when used or displayed in a
threatening manner.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
7.1 Post in offices.
7.2 Place in the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual and on the
Intranet.
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
8.1 Policy F10.00, Rules of Conduct
8.2 Policy B30.00, Harassment
8.4 Memorandum of Understanding for:
8.4.1 SPMT Bargaining Unit
8.4.2 Local 501 Bargaining Unit
8.4.3 OCFA Bargaining Units
8.4.3.1 Administrative and Clerical
8.4.3.2 Engineering
8.4.3.3 Technical Services
8.5 Integrated Emergency Response Plan
FAHR COMMITTEE Mee117oj a ToBa. 1r99
11no/99 11n7(99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
FMR99-86 19(n
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR RESTRUCTURING THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates of
Participation long-term borrowings.
2. Authorize the General Manager to execute professional service agreements with
PaineWebber, Inc. and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the COP
restructuring plan.
SUMMARY
This agenda item reports on the findings of additional efforts to develop and implement
improvements to the District's existing variable rate Certificates of Participation (COP)
financing program, and prepare for future borrowings in support of the District's
Strategic Plan capital improvement program. Adoption of the recommended actions will
approve a restructuring plan for the District's existing COP debt issues, and will
authorize staff to retain the investment banking firm of PaineWebber, and the bond
counsel firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to implement the restructuring plan.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
An estimated $1.4 million in long-term cost savings would be generated by the
proposed COP restructuring plan.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted. However, professional services fees would be
reimbursed by cost savings.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District has five series of Certificates of Participation (COPs) comprising a total
outstanding par amount of approximately $361 million. The following table describes
each COP in detail.
Mrm-mSpeMYammW Rq 11Msous/peMa ReR✓a111� 14m e:
R. y Page 1
EXISTING COP FINANCING PROGRAM
Outstanding Participating Debt S .Interest Rate
Par Amount Districts Structure I Mode
Series S83.300,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13,14 Junior Daily Variable Rate
Series B 18,695,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Closed Senior Fixed Rate
Series C 86.200,00 1,2,3,6,7,11 Junior Daily Variable Rate
Series 1992 129.1 10,OOC 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate m
Refunding(1)
Series 1993 43,950,00 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate m
Refunding (1)
Total $361,255,00
"As of November 1, 1999.
(1) Series 1992 and 1993 COPS refunded the Series 1986 and a portion of the Series'B*COPS.
(2)Variable rate debt swapped to a fixed rate through maturity.
The Series "A," "B," and "C" COPS were issued between 1990 and 1992 to fund a
portion of the"2020 VISION" Master Plan capital improvement program. The Series
1992 Refunding COPS refunded the 1986 COPS ($107 million) issued on behalf of
District Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The 1992 Refunding COPS also refunded approximately $38.4
million of the Series "B" COPS, issued in 1991. Another $39.7 million of the Series "B"
COPS was refunded by the 1993 Refunding COPS.
The District's five outstanding COPS are organized into a three-tier lien structure;
meaning that there are three different claims on the revenues pledged to fund debt
service payments on the COPS. The following table displays the combined debt service
cash flows for the District's five COPS through final maturity in FY 2017-18.
DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE
40
❑Closed Sr.Lim(Series B)
35 D Open Sr. Lien(Series'92&53)
30 ■Junior Lim(Scries A&C)
e 25
°0 20
S 15
10
5
0
-11 Id,, ti�ti��3 tid %"p 1�°b ti�°1 ti�g ti� tiea ti�� ti��ti tia3� ti��e ti��S ti��b tie�1 era
Fiscal Year End
H M.y.SlYpvg �Rgo %IM&wNA RrpvbMnPA-14M be
RAN noose Page 2
With the Strategic Plan capital improvement program requiring approximately $1 billion
through FY 2009-10, of which one-half the cost, or$500 million, would be financed
through long-term borrowings, the District's existing COP financing program should be
restructured to prepare for future "new money" debt issues.
The need for modernizing the District's existing debt was highlighted during recent staff
efforts to solicit banks for substitution of the Letter of Credit (LOC) for the Series "A"
COPS. Discussions with potential providers were complicated by the existing legal
documents which date back to 1986, with minor refinements included between 1990
and 1993.
In short, Letter of Credit banks expressed limited interest in providing a replacement
LOC due to the "several" nature of the Series "A" multi-district credit structure, and the
resulting legal complexities contained in the existing COP covenants.
Strategy
The modernization of the District's existing COP program can be accomplished through
a comprehensive refunding and restructuring approach that would re-align the COP
legal documents to match the District's consolidated organization structure as one
Sanitation District. Under this approach, the rating agencies would view the District as a
single credit structure. At the same time, this would not necessarily impact the
individual revenue areas within the consolidated District
The plan would include a two-step process: 1) Refund the Series"A," "B," and "C"
COPS through a single Refunding COP offering; and 2) Substitute modernized bond
documents with the swap providers for the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS.
The potential benefits to the District from modernizing the existing bond financing
documents to correspond with District consolidation include:
• Strengthen District's credit for request of formal "Aa" category ratings
• Eliminate or modify need for Letter of Credit replacement in the future
• Simplify the multiple lien levels of the COP issues
• Simplify administration of multiple COP issues
• Reduce overall borrowing costs
• Establish foundation for future borrowings to support Strategic Plan
improvements
Series "A," "B," and "C" COPs
The outstanding Series "A" and "C" variable rate COPs, and the Series "B" fixed rate
COP would be refunded through a single (approximately $190 million)Variable Rate
COP backed by a "Aa" category credit rating of the District.
The Series "A" and "C" variable rate COPs represent a junior, or subordinate, lien on
pledged debt service revenues, whereas the Series"B" fixed rate COP is a closed
senior, or prior, claim on pledged revenues.
X 1"q.E"1,•mb16aN Aqm Rg 11M&aJ Aqp Rept\11B 14m.Mc
R,,,,o- a Page 3
The advantages of combining the Series "A," "B" and "C" into a single refunding COP
include:
Only one disclosure document (Official Statement) would be needed;
• Annual debt service payments would be levelized;
Reducing borrowing costs by eliminating the Series"A" Letter of Credit; and
Simplify lien structure on pledged revenues by eliminating junior and closed
senior liens, and issuing new Refunding COPS as senior lien, on parity with the
senior lien 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS.
As a senior lien obligation, the proposed Refunding COP should receive a stand-alone
"Aa" category credit rating, and therefore not require bond insurance or a Letter of
Credit. As with all variable rate debt obligations, a liquidity facility would continue to be
required.
Overall, it is estimated that present value cost savings of more than $1.4 million would
be generated over the life of the Refunding COPs from a combination of a lower cost
liquidity facility, elimination of Letter of Credit fees, and debt service savings.
Importantly, approximately $470,000 of these savings would accrue during the first
three years following COP issuance, thereby providing recovery of costs associated
with issuing the Refunding COPs, including legal services and underwriting fees. Costs
of issuance are estimated to range from $150,000 to $225.000. A summary of the
estimated cost savings is presented in Attachment "A."
Series 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPs
The District's two existing Refunding COPS are variable rate obligations, which include
fixed interest rate swap agreements. Called "synthetic fixed rate" financings, referring to
the fixed interest rate swaps, these two Refundings represent an open senior lien on
pledged debt service revenues.
The existing legal documents with the swap providers, AIG for the 1992 COPs, and
SocGen for the 1993 COPS, and with the bond insurer (AMBAC for both COPS), would
be substituted with documents that would replicate those associated with the proposed
new Refunding COP issue. Based on initial contacts, the swap providers have
indicated their openness to consider a documents substitution. Staff will keep the
Committee informed about the status of further discussions as they take place.
Although no direct savings would be generated, the modernization of the bond
documents for the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS would further streamline the overall
debt structure for the District's existing COPS. Costs associated with preparing the legal
documents would be reimbursed from the savings discussed earlier in this report.
Finance Team and Timeline
It is proposed that investment banking and bond counsel services be retained to more
fully develop and implement the restructuring proposals discussed above. It is
requested that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee authorize
staff to engage PaineWebber and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for this project. Both
a.A.a euse Page 4
firms have developed an extensive knowledge base about the financial and legal
structures of the District's existing COP issues, together with a working knowledge of
completing similar restructurings.
In recent months, PaineWebber has demonstrated their expertise in developing and
analyzing opportunities to modernize the District's existing COP financing program.
They have been instrumental in developing the proposals discussed in this report.
PaineWebber currently serves as the remarketing agent for the District's Series "A"
variable rate COPS, and the 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS. Compensation for
PaineWebber would be negotiated and contingent upon successful completion of the
plan through underwriting fees.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has provided legal services on various matters related to
the District's existing COP financing program, and is therefore, intimately familiar with
the legal documents and structures of the District's COP issues. Most recently, they
have assisted staff efforts related to substitution of the Series "A" Letter of Credit. Costs
for legal services would be reimbursed through cost savings upon successful
completion of the plan.
Given the knowledge and experience that both firms can contribute to the proposed
restructuring plan, it is estimated that the plan can be accomplished in approximately
120 days, as illustrated by the following timeline. Staff would negotiate professional
services agreements with PaineWebber and Orrick, Herrington & Sutciffe, for execution
by the General Manager. The restructuring would be completed in advance of any
future new money debt financings. Plans for future long-term borrowings will be
addressed by separate reports to the Committee.
➢ Finalize debt service and cash flow modeling
December ➢ Initiate formal discussions with swap providers and insurer
D Develop legal documents
January ➢ Develop rating agency presentation
➢ Develop disclosure documents(Official Statement)
➢ Conduct rating agency presentations
February ➢ Conduct institutional investor presentations
➢ Finalize legal and disclosure documents
Fxecute Refunding COP issue for Series'A,"B,'and'C'
March ➢
➢ Substitute documents for Series 92 and 93 Refunding COPs
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
A. Estimated Cost Savings
KM taWaMvlav4 Ag." R. %1993e NM .R.R 111B3f ml4(q.M[
RM 87NO Page 5
ATTACHMENT A
Estimated Cost Savings
Refunding COPS
Outstanding r Cost Reduction Estimated Present -.
Par Amount Strategy Value Savin
$83,300,000 Eliminate need $1,042,000
Series A Matures 811115 for high cost credit
enhancement
$18,695,000 Refinancefized $50000
SerleslB Matures 8/1/04 rate COPS with
lower cost variable rate
debt
$86,200,000 Replace current $390,000
Series C Matures 8/1/17 hquidiryfaciliry with
lower cost facility
Totals $188,195,000 $1,482,000
Discouoted at"%
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir.
11/10/99 11/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Rem NUMW Rem NuMber
FAHR99-87 1 14(g)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT(CAFR) FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 (FAHR 98-XX)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
for the year ended June 30, 1999, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and
Associates, Certified Public Accountants.
SUMMARY
The District's independent auditors, Moreland &Associates, have completed their
examination of the District's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1999 and
have again issued an unqualified opinion. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the
results of the audit and the corresponding Auditor's report to the Committee. Michael
Moreland, Partner, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors.
This year, staff has again prepared the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that
incorporates the audited financial statements in-house. For the last five years, the
District has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This years report will
again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award.
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Auditors opinion letter, the
Auditors Report to the Committee, the Auditors Report on Compliance and on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Auditors Appropriations Limit Report are
attached.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
RMy.NaWyeNrlBaaN/yMr aepaYll�BwN♦peM FePxh111BGbn 1 �p)Ox
e,„„a, Page 1
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1999
2. Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
3. Auditor's Report to the FAHR Committee
4. Appropriations Limit Report
HM �Ap R. %IMP aN Ap Rpa'41l iG IA�p�pac
Rom- � Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE weeen9Dzte Toed.er ar.
111,0199 11117199
AGENDA REPORT Rem NumW Item Number
FAHR99-89 14(h)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Gary Streed, Director of Finance; David Ludwin, Director of
Engineering
SUBJECT: PURCHASING RESOLUTION AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award
of Purchasing Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award
of Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement said
Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12,
OCSD 98-21, and OCSD 98-43. This Resolution was approved by the PDC Committee
on October 7, 1999, on a 7:1 vote.
SUMMARY
Discussion of revisions to the Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority began
shortly after the July 1998 consolidation. A cross-discipline and cross-department team
was formed from representatives from Purchasing/Contracts, Engineering, 0&M,
Accounting and General Counsel to review, consolidate, standardize and update four
Resolutions that governed the procurement process.
The PDC Committee was assigned the first review by the Steering Committee because
most of the proposed changes involve the public works process. This includes
construction contracts and change orders for minor and major projects; professional
service agreements (PSAs) and addenda for professional engineers, architectural,
environmental, land surveying and construction management services. After three
months of discussion, revision, and additional information, the PDC Committee
approved the proposed Resolution last month on a 7:1 vote.
The FAHR Committee is being asked to approve the PDC Committee
recommendations, as well as certain other changes to the more routine procurement
process and delegation of authority.
At the last meeting, the FAHR Committee asked for some clarification of the PDC
Committee action and a review of our internal controls. The enclosed Table "1" and
Table "2" reflect the clarification, and internal controls are the subject of a separate
informational report on tonight's agenda.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
HNrpmuwwub.b naww Fe{ab\1 Wd eoan ApeNa Re«m\11 WNm t1�n1a«
n-..e vmree Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT ,
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Routine Procurements
In order to be effective, purchasing authority must be delegated into the organization.
Prior attempts to delineate this authority were accomplished by the use of position
classifications, i.e., foreman, manager, etc. However, the various departments and
divisions are organized and structured differently, and the former classification
delegations were not standard, efficient or practical throughout the entire agency.
Allowing each Department Head the ability to establish separate authority levels for
purchases under$10,000 will provide the organization with the ability to manage more
efficiently in the future.
This will be accomplished by assigning various employees to levels A, B or C, with
maximum purchase authorities of$2,000/$5,000/$10,000. Division Managers would
continue to be limited to $25,000, and Department Heads would continue to be limited
to $50,000. All purchases over$5,000 would be subject to the bidding process and
purchases below $5,000 would be bid at the Purchasing/Contract Manager's discretion.
Currently, the Board of Directors is required to approve any training or meeting
attendance outside of the United States and Canada. The proposed Resolution adds
Mexico to the destinations that may be approved at a staff level. This change would
treat meetings in all of North America in the same manner and would be consistent with
the spirit of NAFTA.
Professional Service Agreement (PSAs)
PSAs are generally within the purview of the PDC Committee and the Engineering
Department. PSAs are limited by definition to agreements with firms providing
engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management
services.
Currently, after a selection process, the General Manager may award a PSA for up to
$25,000. He may subsequently authorize an additional $50,000 in addenda, providing
no single addenda exceeds $25,000. This means that the General Manager has up to
$75,000 of authority for PSAs and addenda provided certain conditions are met.
H.1y.ObV peNa&vrE ApeMa Repv411B3]Boam naenea aepoK\119PXem taml Nc
a..;w. vmae Page 2
The proposal would increase the total authority of the General Manager to $100,000.
This amount includes the original agreement and all addenda. Certain proposal and
selection processes will continue to be required, and all PSAs and addenda approved
by the General Manager will be reported to the PDC Committee each month.
In the case where only one firm is qualified or can best perform a service, the General
Manager's authority is reduced to $50,000. All PSAs for these "specialized services"
exceeding $50,000 will be awarded by the Board of Directors.
Small Capital Proiects
In December 1997, the PDC Committee and the Board authorized a small capital
projects program. Eighteen task orders have been issued under this program, saving
an average of 2.5 months on each task order, compared with obtaining Board approval
of a separate contract for each project. This delegated authority has been key in
alleviating a backlog of projects that had built up over several years. At the end of the
contract period, each of the consultants was asked if they would extend this year's
hourly rates for an additional year. All agreed to extend the contract terms for an
additional year. The Director of Engineering can currently extend these agreements for
one year. The proposed Resolution would allow the Director of Engineering to extend
these agreements for two years, for a total of three years, with no increases in costs.
Eliminating an annual RFP and consultant selection process would save staff about 350
hours per year, or 0.17 full time equivalent staffing effort, and allow the District to lock in
favorable consulting rates for a three-year period.
The PDC Committee has also recommended an addenda authority for the General
Manager in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per task order.
Public Works Projects
Public Works Projects are subject to special provisions in the Government Code. Of
course, the proposed Resolution complies with all of these special requirements.
Currently, all Public Works Projects are awarded by the Board of Directors, and the
General Manager and the PDC Committee have some change order authority.
The proposed Resolution would allow the General Manager to award contracts up to
$100,000 and the PDC Committee to award contracts up to $200,000. Change orders
may be approved at each level, but the total contract and change order amount cannot
exceed the original authority level.
Cost Reduction Opportunities
While one of the reasons for the proposed changes is to standardize procedures and
authority levels, another is to reduce costs and save time by providing a faster, easier
process to the Engineering staff.
wr ftm g.m M R"w 11 +mm 14 r)
Rw eaoxn Page 3
An analysis of the PSAs and Public Works Contracts that were approved by either the
General Manager, the PDC Committee, or the Board from January 1998 to July 1999
was undertaken for the PDC Committee. The analysis compared the number of items
that were approved by each group under the current DOA and the proposed DOA. The
results are:
Approved By: Approved By: Number of
(Existing DOA (Proposed DOA Projects
1. Board PDC 10
2. Board General Manager 5
3. PDC General Manager 2
1. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the PDC Committee level rather
than the Board, there is a 3-week timesavings, resulting in 30-weeks of timesavings
over the past 18 months.
2. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the General Manager rather than
the Board, there is an 8-week timesavings, resulting in 10 months of timesavings
over the past 18 months.
3. For each item that is proposed to be approved by the General Manager rather than
the PDC Committee, there is a 5-week timesavings, resulting in 10 weeks of
timesavings over the past 18 months.
The total time that could have been saved over the past 18-month period that was
reviewed with the proposed Delegation of Authority is 80 weeks. Along with the
timesavings, project costs would have been reduced, since staff support and associated
costs would have been reduced proportionally to the timesavings.
For those items that are proposed to be approved by the General Manager, a
substantial amount of staff effort will be reduced since formal Agenda Reports will not
have to be prepared for presentation to the PDC Committee and Board of Directors. As
the number of capital projects increase over the next four to six years, the number of
items requiring Board action will also increase unless this proposal is approved. With
the proposed delegated levels of authority, staff will be more efficient, projects will be
completed on shorter schedules and project costs will be reduced.
The following table summarizes the savings in time and staff effort that would be
realized if the proposed Delegation of Authority is adopted.
Existing Proposed Man-hours
DOA DOA Time Saved Per Saver Per Time Saved Man-hours
Approval Approval No. of Approval Approval Total Saved Total
Level Level Projects eeks Hours (Weeks) Hours
Board PDC 10 3 2 30 20
PDC GM 2 5 7-50 10 100
Board GM 5 a 9-52 40 260
Total 90 380
HM fth OeMa�Ap Reµ %lRddmw Mew ReprY�11B3Pem�NN.Ox
Re.:.em v Page 4
Over the 18-month period reviewed, staff processed 17 approvals of either PSAs, PSA
Addenda, or construction contracts that could have been processed faster under the
proposed Delegation of Authority Resolution. A total of 80 weeks of additional project
time could have been saved with the implementation of the proposed resolution, as well
as up to 380 man-hours of staff effort.
The three enclosed workflow charts were requested by the PDC Committee in order to
better document how the proposed changes in authority levels would affect the approval
process. These charts support the previous table and indicate a substantial savings in
project schedules and staff effort. In most cases, projects that can be accelerated will
be projects that have reduced costs.
Internal Controls
The FAHR Committee requested an update on the District's internal controls. A
separate informational report is being prepared to address this request, but a summary
may be appropriate here.
In the spring and summer of 1994, KPMG Peat Marwick conducted a special
comprehensive review of our internal control systems, operating policies and
procedures, and accounting practices. This review, a supplement to the annual
financial audit, included the following areas:
1. Safeguarding of cash and investments
2. Segregation of duties
3. Employee expense policies
4. Gift acceptance Practices
5. Procurement and job order processes
6. Cash collection security
A final report was delivered to the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Board of Directors in
September 1994. KPMG Peat Marwick noted as a "significant strength" that, "The
Districts maintain effective policies and procedures over operations and maintenance
procurement"
In 1995, staff presented complete internal control, policies and procedures to the Fiscal
Policy Committee in January, March and April. These were very detailed presentations,
including accounts payable, payroll and treasury management. This special review was
required so soon after the KPMG Peat Marwick audit because many functions were
then being assumed by District staff that had been performed by County staff prior to
the County bankruptcy.
Each year a financial audit is prepared by an independent accounting firm. Financial
audits are performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements.
They are conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and
include certain test work. A separate requirement of Government Auditing Standards is
a report on the auditor's consideration of internal controls over financial reporting. It
should be noted that this review and report would not necessarily disclose all material
HNgAYVP� MA Re(p iMa-W Aq " RK 11Wll"m 11(h).Ex
Rp aaoee Page 5
weaknesses in the internal controls; their purpose is to help the auditors design a
testing program. Another part of the financial audit is the "Management Letter." This
letter from the auditor to the FAHR Committee discusses any weaknesses or areas of
concern that were discovered, evaluates potential consequences, and proposes a
solution.
In addition, staff provides a summary of all PSAs and addenda approved by the General
Manager to the PDC Committee on a quarterly basis. It is proposed that this would be
done monthly upon adoption of the new Delegation of Authority. All task orders
awarded to the small projects consultants are reported to the PDC Committee on a
quarterly basis. Staff also provides, on a monthly basis, a summary of all change
orders to construction contracts approved by the General Manager, and a "heads-up" to
the Committee on all projects where change orders are projected to be greater than
five-percent. These reports allow the PDC Committee to be fully, and continuously,
informed as to how the staff is utilizing its delegated authority.
To summarize, the Directors can be assured that management and staff have adequate
policies, procedures, practices and reviews in place to safeguard the District's assets,
and to avoid financial malfeasance.
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Current PDC Authorization vs. Proposed PDC Authorization
2. Current PDC Authorization vs. Proposed General Manager Authorization
3. Current Board Authorization vs. Proposed PDC Authorization
4. Revised Table "1"
5. Revised Table "2"
GGS:lc
R'.Y UhNpwNa MAp R" 11Ma Ap R&p %11W 14(w),�c
R..mS. v Page 6
CURRENT PDC AUTHORIZATION
VERSUS
PROPOSED GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZATION
Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 15 - 60 Total Man Hours / 6 Calendar Weeks To Complete
6 Hours-6e Hour.
AR Dneed l Reviewed/Corrected B Approved by Engineering Supervisor 8 PDC
Engineering Manager Melling
Contract Reviewed and Approved b Contncts Manager a Hours
Y 9 AR Reviewed Hoursrtedetle
Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM.
2 Hours
Board Secretary Prepares
PDC Package
Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 8 - 10 Total Man Hours / 1 Calendar Week To Complete
44 Moore
PM Prepares Noun a Haur
GM 3Hours GM
Package; contraRMexacB Package
Memo, Approvedreviewed by
Oonbad,a DOE,
Attachments y AGM,and
conger Approved
Mars
by Use GM
Week 4 I Week 2 I Week J I Week 4 I Weeks I Week 6 1 Week 7 I Week 8 I Week 9
CURRENT BOARD AUTHORIZATION
VERSUS
PROPOSED GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZATION
Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 17 - 62 Total Man Hours 19 Calendar Weeks To Complete
6Hours-50 Hours 2Hours
AR Drafted(Reviewed/Connected &Approved by Engineering Supervisor& PDC Boats
Engineering Manager Secretary Boartl Meeting
Meeting
&Hours Prepares
Contract Reviewed and Approved by Contracts Manager Aft Revlewetl/Cort¢ctetl8 Board
Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM. Package
2 Hours
Board Secretary Prepares
PDC Package
Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 8 - 10 Total Man Hours / 1 Calendar Week To Complete
44 Hours
PM Prepares 7 Hours 1 Hour
GM Contract GM
Package; Reviewed Package
Manna, and reviewed by
Contract,& Approved DOE,
A&achmants by AGM,and
Contracts Approved
Manager by the GM
Week t I Week 2 1 Week S I Week 4 I Week 5 I Week 6 I Week 7 I Week 8 I Week 9 1
CURRENT BOARD AUTHORIZATION
VERSUS
PROPOSED PDC AUTHORIZATION
Current Process with Existing DOA ----- 17 -62 Total Man Hours/9 Calendar Weeks To Complete
6 Hours-60 Hours I
AR Dro6ed I Reviewed I Coweded d Approved by Ereh vfing Supervisor 6 PDC
Engrossing Manager Board Meeting
Meeting
B Noura
Contract Redevved snd Approved by CordraGS M9aper AR Revhwed l Corrected 6
Approved by DOE,AGM,and GM.
2 Hours
Board Secretary Prepares
PDC Psekage -
Proposed Process with Proposed DOA ----- 15 -60 Total Man Hours /6 Calendar Weeks To Complete
6 Hours-60 Hours
AR Drafted I ReWewsd I Corrected 6 Approved by Engineering Supervisor 6 PDC
Enghnrhg Manager
MeeN g
CoMrecl Reviewed and A CoMrscts Manager 6 Hours
Approved W ARdbyD d , orrected ADM,
Approved M DOE,AGM,and GM.
2 Hours
Bard Secretary prepares
PDC Package
Week I I Week 2 1 Week 3 1 Week 4 1 Week 5 1 Week G I Week 7 1 Week 8 1 Week 9 1
Revised Table 1
Summary of Changes to Financial Approval Levels
Proposed
Delegated Area Current Delegation Delegation Justification
Director of Engineering Up to$50,000 per Up to$50,000 per No change from existing authority.
authority for small project each task order, no each task order, no
task orders. authority for addenda. authority for addenda.
General Manager authority No authority for Addenda not PDC Committee recommended that
for small project task order addenda. exceeding$50,000. change order or addenda authority be
addenda. granted only to General Manager.
General Manager authority Up to$25,000 for Up to$100,000 total Maintain consistency with GM's
for PSAs and addenda. original agreement per PSA, including current authority for services,
and up to$25,000 Contract and all equipment and materials.
PSAs are limited to additional for each addenda. Non-PSA purchases between $50,000
professional engineers, addendum, NTE 'Specialized Service" and $100,000 are reported to the
architectural, $50,000 total for all PSAs over$50,000 FAHR each quarter. PSA actions by
environmental, land addenda. Total of will be awarded by the the GM will be reported to the PDC
surveying and construction contract and addenda Board of Directors. monthly rather than quarterly.
management services. NTE$75,000.
General Manager authority Up to$50,000 Up to$100,000 Maintain consistency with GM's
for Public Works Contract (additions only)for (additions only)for current authority for services,
and Change Orders. each change order. each change order. In equipment and materials.
In no case may no case may change
change order order cumulative total The proposal would allow the GM to
cumulative total exceed 5% of total begin to award Public Works
exceed 5%of total Contract or$100,000, Contracts between $35,000 and
contract or$100.000, whichever is less. $100,000, and would increase the
whichever is less. Public Works single change order authority.
All Public Works Contracts less than
Contracts are $100,000 would be
awarded by the awarded by the
Board. General Manager.
Board Committee's Up to$50,000 per Up to$200,000 total Consistency with Board Committee's
authority for PSAs and original agreement per PSA, including current delegated authority of 2x the
Addenda. and up$50,000 per contract and all GM's authority.
each addenda, NTE addenda.
$100.000 total. Primarily affects PDC Committee.
Board Committee's Up to$100.000 Up to$200,000 Consistency with Board Committee's
authority for Public Works (additions only)per (additions only)per current delegated authority of 2x the
Contract and Change each additional each additional GM's authority.
Orders. change order. In no change order. In no
case may cumulative case may cumulative Allows PDC Committee to award
change order total change order total Public Works Contracts up to
exceed 10%of total exceed 10%of total $200,000 without further Board action.
contract or$200,000, Contract or$200,000,
whichever is less. whichever is less.
All PW Contracts are PDC awards contracts
awarded by the Board up to$200,000.
Board of Directors Over$50,000 each for [change
r$200,000 on Time savings due to the reduction in
authority for non-Public PSA and addenda. nal contract and the volume of small projects that
Works Contracts, PSAs Over$100,000 on $200,000 or 10% would have to be reviewed by the
and Public Works original PW contract tal Contract, Board.
Contracts. and over$100.000, or hever is less,on
10%of total contrecl, orders. Currently all PW Contracts are
whichever is less, on r$50,000 for PSA awarded by the Board.
change orders. Specialized Serv".
\VadonttletelFxp.dtafin@10bireetl uA 13010 110. .Eoe
111211999 Table 2 9:57 AM
Proposed Purchasing Resolution
Levels of Authority
November 1999
Article III Article IV Article V Article VI
Decision Professional Services Agreements(PSA) (1) Public Works Projects
Authority Supplies, Small Capital Project(2) Me or Capital Project Construction Construction Meetings,
Vesting Equipment, Specialized Professional PSA Professional PSA Projects Change Training,
Level Services Services(3) Consultant Addenda Consultant Addenda (Over$35,000) Orders Travel
Staff A up to$10,000
Bupto 5,000
C up to 2,000
Division Up to$25,000 Up to$2,000
Manager
Department Up to$50,000 Up to$50,000 Up to 2 add'I Issue RFO May negotiate Over$2,000
Head and 1 year years, no dollars and/or RFP
General Up to$100,000 Up to$50.000 Up to$50,000 Up to$100,000 Up to$100,000 Up to$100,000 Lower of 5%
Manager Including original or$100,000
PSA
Board Up to$200.000 Up to$200,000 Up to$200,000 Lower of 10%
Committee Including original or$200,000
PSA
Board Of Over$100,000 Over$50,000 Over$200,000 Over$200,000 Over$200,000 Over 10% Out of USA,
Directors unless specified or$200,000 Canada and
In annual budget - Mexico
Note(1): PSAs are limited to Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental,
Land Surveying and Construction Management Services
Note(2): Small Capital Projects are projects with Engineering-related services
estimated to amount to less than$50,000.
Note(3): Specialized Services are those only one qualified firm can best perform.
.,. _.....unnn ......e e,.� 10.25-99
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE
AWARD OF PURCHASING ORDERS AND CONTRACTS;
AWARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT CONTRACTS;
AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS;
AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT SAID
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; AND REPEALING
RESOLUTIONS NOS. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-
21, AND OCSD 98-43
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS
Section 1.01 Findings - Declaration of Intent.
ARTICLE II: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Section 2.01 Purpose and Scope.
Section 2.02 Authorizing General Manager to Establish Rules and
Guidelines.
Section 2.03 Procedure for Delegation of Authority.
ARTICLE III: PURCHASING SYSTEMS RE SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND
SERVICES
Section 3.01 Purpose and Scope.
Section 3.02 Purchasing System Adoption.
Section 3.03 Purchasing Division Delegated Authority.
Section 3.04 Requisitions.
Section 3.05 Cooperative Procurement.
Section 3.06 Purchases: Bidding Requirements.
TLW Draft No. 14:10121M91103185-CLEAN
1
Section 3.07 Purchases: Emergency.
Section 3.08 Purchases: Standardized Prices and Specialized
Services.
Section 3.09 Purchase Orders.
Section 3.10 Purchases: Encumbrances of Funds.
Section 3.11 Blanket Purchase Orders.
Section 3.12 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Greater Than
$50,000.00.
Section 3.13 Purchases Between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00.
Section 3.14 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than
$50,000.00.
Section 3.15 Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $5,000.00.
Section 3.16 Inspection and Testing.
Section 3.17 Purchases: Negotiated Contracts.
Section 3.18 Surplus Supplies, Materials, and Equipment.
Section 3.19 Sale of Real Property.
Section 3.20 Recordkeeping.
ARTICLE IV: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
Section 4.01 Purpose and Scope.
Section 4.02 Retention of Professional Technical Consultants.
Section 4.03 Small Capital Project—Defined.
Section 4.04 Small Capital Project: Approval of Plans and
Specifications.
Section 4.05 Small Capital Project: Annual Budget Approval.
TLW Draft No. 14:10121199:#103185-CLEAN
2
Section 4.06 Small Capital Project: Selection of Consultants—
Procedure.
Section 4.07 Major and Minor Capital Projects: Defined,
Section 4.08 Major Capital Project: Scope of Work.
Section 4.09 Major Capital Project: Selection of Consultants —
Procedure.
Section 4.10 Major Capital Project: Award of Professional Services
Agreements.
Section 4.11 Major Capital Project: Approval of Plans and
Specifications.
ARTICLE V: PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
Section 5.01 Purpose and Scope.
Section 5.02 Public Works: Bidding Required.
Section 5.03 Bidding Procedure: Public Works Construction
Greater Than $35,000.00.
Section 5.04 Approval of Change Orders to Construction
Agreements.
ARTICLE VI: MEETINGS (AND RELATED TRAVEL) AND TRAINING
(AND RELATED TRAVEL) EXPENDITURES
Section 6.01 Purpose and Scope.
Section 6.02 General.
Section 6.03 Policies and Procedures.
ARTICLE VII: MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.01 Noncompliance.
Section 7.02 Severability.
TLW Draft No. 14:10121/99:#103186-CLEAN
3
Section 7.03 Effective Date.
Section 7.04 Repeal of Prior Resolutions.
ARTICLE I
RECITAL OF FINDINGS
Section 1.01: Findings - Declaration of Intent.
A. California Government Code Section 54202 requires that every
local agency shall adopt policies and procedures, including bidding regulations,
governing purchases of supplies, services, and equipment, and that purchases of
supplies, services, and equipment by the local agency shall be in accordance with said
duly adopted policies.
B. California Government Code Section 54204 requires that if the
local agency is other than a city, county, or city and county, policies provided for in
Section 54202 of said Code shall be adopted by means of a written rule or regulation,
copies of which shall be available for public distribution.
C. In order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of
supplies, services, and equipment, and the letting of public works contracts at the best
possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs, together with other
relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over purchases, to clearly define
authority for the purchasing function, and to establish bidding procedures, a purchasing
system for the District, beyond what is required by said Sections of the Government
Code, is desirable and in the best public interest.
D. An effective, comprehensive organization needs an administrative
structure with support procedures that are logical, efficient, well-documented, are
understood by the organization's employees and members of the public, and that
enable timely and responsive administrative acquisition of materials, supplies, and
services. The organization should also appropriately delegate authority to those
persons and units having responsibility for these activities.
E. The Board of Directors has determined that a delegation of
authority structure provides for better training of employees which will result in improved
efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations.
ARTICLE II
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:M1031B5-CLEAN
4
Section 2.01: Purpose and Scope. In an effort to remove barriers that
prevent District employees from performing their jobs at the highest level of efficiency, a
delegation of authority structure will appropriately train the employees, and by providing
increased responsibility and ownership, will contribute to the improved efficiency and
effectiveness of the District.
Section 2.02: Authorizing General Manager to Establish Rules and
Guidelines. The General Manager of the District is hereby authorized to establish rules
and guidelines to implement Board policies and to delegate to Staff signature authority
to initiate and execute contracts or purchase orders to acquire services, including
professional services, supplies, and materials, and public works project contracts, all as
more particularly specified in Articles III through VI.
Section 2.03: Procedure for Delegation of Authority. The following
provisions establish delegated signature authority for contracts and purchase orders for
the acquisition of supplies, services, materials, equipment, and professional services.
The delegated authority for each functional management level will be established one
level higher in the absence of specifically identified authority. The General Manager's
authority is delegated to the Assistant General Manager("AGM") in the General
Manager's absence.
These procedures establish the framework and boundaries within which a
delegates can operate, and also provide Management with a mechanism to evaluate
implementation and hold the delegatee accountable for his/her actions.
Upon delegation of authority by the General Manager, each Department shall be
authorized to further delegate to respective employees within the Department. The
delegation shall be effective upon the Department Head setting forth, in writing, the
name of the delegated employee, his/her job position, and speck level of delegated
authority designated as Level A, B, or C, respectively, and filing it with the
Contracts/Purchasing Manager. The General Manager shall establish procedures to
implement further delegated authority into the organization.
For contracts and purchase orders for the acquisition of supplies, materials,
equipment, and services (excluding public works contracts governed by State law and
professional services agreements), the following signature authority is hereby
established. The functional authority level listed describes the highest level of signature
approval needed. Intermediate management approval between the initiator/requestor
and listed approval level must also be obtained.
A. Approval Levels
All items above $100,000.00 are to be approved by the Board prior to
TLW Dmft No. 16:1021I99:9103185.CLEAN
5
purchase, with the exception of emergency items, pursuant to Section 3.13. All items
between $50.000.00 and $100,000.00 are reviewed and approved by the General
Manager prior to purchase, and reported to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
All items below $50,000.00 are approved pursuant to the following delegation of
authority:
1. Items exceeding $100,000 require Board of Directors approval,
unless previously authorized by the Board for items identified in the
annual District budget.
2. Items $50,000 to $99,999 require General Manager
or Assistant General Manager approval.
3. Items $25,000 to $49,999 require Department Director approval.
4. Items $10,000 to $24,999 require Division Manager approval.
5. Items $5,000 to $9,999 require Level A approval.
6. Items $2,000 to $4,999 require Level B approval.
7. Items less than $2,000 require Level C approval.
B. Co-Signatures. In addition to the signature of the Delegated Authority:
1. To ensure that all policies and procedures governing purchase
orders and contracts are followed, all contracts or purchase orders
will be signed by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or his
designee.
2. All purchases for computer hardware, software, and communication
equipment will be pre-approved by the Information Technology
Director, or his designee.
C. Procedural Requirements. All policies and procedures adopted by the
Board of Directors or promulgated by the General Manager governing the procurement
of services, equipment, or supplies will apply, and shall be complied with.
Budgeted funds must be available prior to the acquisition of goods or
services. Upon the identification of goods or services needed that are not originally
budgeted, either a budget transfer request form must be completed demonstrating that
adequate funds are available to cover the acquisition, or the Board of Directors must
authorize a budget amendment, at which time, the item being acquired would fall into
nW Draft No. 14:1012V99*103185.CLEAN
6
the budgeted category.
ARTICLE III
PURCHASING SYSTEM RE SUPPLIES,
SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS
Section 3.01: Purpose and Scope. In order to establish efficient
procedures for the purchase of supplies, services, materials and equipment, and the
letting of public works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality
and delivery needs and other relevant factors; to exercise positive financial control over
purchases; to clearly define authority for the purchasing function; to establish bidding
procedures, pursuant to Section 54202 of the Government Code of the State of
California, a purchasing system is deemed necessary.
Section 3.02: Purchasing System Adoption. The procedures and authority
set forth in this Resolution are intended to operate in concert with and supplemental to
the delegation of authority granted by the governing Board of Directors in the adoption
of this Resolution. Full compliance with the provisions of all Articles in this Resolution is
required.
Section 3.03: Purchasing Division Delegated Authority. There is hereby
vested in the Purchasing Division (hereinafter referred to as "Purchasing"), under the
general supervision and direction of the Director of Finance, the authority for the
purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment, letting of public works
contracts and establishment of rules, procedures and administrative policies relative
thereto. The Director of Finance may delegate or assign any or all of the following
duties to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager:
A. To purchase or contract for supplies, services, materials, and
equipment required by any Department or Division, in accordance with purchasing
procedures prescribed by this Resolution; such administrative regulations as
Purchasing shall adopt for the internal management and operation of Purchasing; and
such other rules and regulations as shall be adopted by the Board of Directors.
B. To negotiate and recommend execution of contracts for the
purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment; for construction of public
works projects; and for the disposition of surplus property and by-products of the
sewage treatment process.
TLW D2fi No.14:1U21199E103185-CLEAN
7
C. To submit to General Counsel for review or approval, as necessary,
all contracts, purchase orders, and other related documents, the original executed
copies of which shall be delivered to the Board Secretary for custodianship.
D. To prepare for the District, the needed standards and
specifications of quality in supplies, services, materials, equipment, and construction at
the best cost and under the most favorable conditions, with due consideration to
delivery and other relevant factors.
E. To discourage uniform bidding and endeavor to obtain as full and
open competition as possible on all purchases and sales.
F. To prepare rules, regulations, procedures, and administrative
policies, and revisions thereto, governing the purchase of supplies, services, materials,
and equipment; for the letting of public works construction contracts in accordance with
the provisions of state law; and disposition of surplus property and by-products.
G. To prepare rules, regulations, procedures, and administrative
policies, and revisions thereto, governing the warehousing of inventories.
H. To keep informed of current developments in the field of
purchasing, including but not limited to prices, market conditions and new products.
I. To prescribe and maintain such forms as reasonably necessary to
the implementation of this Resolution and other rules and regulations of the District.
J. To develop specifications to establish minimum standards for all
purchases.
K. To supervise the inspection of all supplies, services, materials, and
equipment purchases to insure conformance with specifications.
L. To provide for transfer of surplus or unused supplies and
equipment between Departments, as needed.
M. To have custodianship and control of all inventories and surplus
property-
N. To maintain a bidders' list, vendors' catalog file, and records
needed for efficient operation of the Purchasing Division.
TLW onR No. 14AMM4103185-CLEAN
8
O. To review, approve, and maintain active insurance documents for
all District procurements.
P. To undertake such other and future duties as, in the Director's
discretion, are incidental and necessary to the conduct of the Division.
O. To revise all records to reflect the sale, transfer, or reorganization
of a supplier's business, or a change in the supplier's name for doing business, so long
as all other terms and conditions of the original agreement remain the same. In such
event of an assignment of the purchase order or contract by the supplier, the District
shall not be bound until it has given its consent in writing, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld. An amendment to the original agreement shall be prepared
authorizing and consenting to the assignment and shall be executed by the General
Manager, or his designee, on the District's behalf.
Section 3.04: Requisitions. All employees of the District who need or
require supplies, services, materials, or equipment to carry out the defined duties of
their positions, shall submit requisitions, in advance, for purchases or warehouse
requisitions to Purchasing, in accordance with the adopted rules, regulations,
procedures, and policies of the Purchasing Division. Usage of the District's
procurement cards shall be exempt from this requirement.
Section 3.05: Cooperative Procurement.
A. The District, through Purchasing, may participate in or sponsor,
conduct and/or administer a Cooperative Procurement Agreement for the acquisition of
procured items or services with any other public agency purchasing unit, in accordance
with an agreement between the District and the other public agency.
B. The District, through Purchasing, may sell to, acquire from, or use
any property belonging to another public agency, including the cooperative use of
supplies or services.
C. Participation in the County of Orange Cooperative Purchasing
Program has been expressly authorized by adoption of Board of Directors Resolution
No. OCSD 98-22.
Section 3.06: Purchases: Bidding Requirements. Except as hereinafter
provided, purchasing of supplies, services, materials, or equipment shall be by bid
procedures as set forth in this Article III, when the purchase is estimated to have a
value greater than Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars; the commodities or services
TLW Drefl No. 14:10/21199:N103195-CLEAN
9
Y
may be obtained from more than one vendor; or are not standardized as to price; and
no emergency exists.
Section 3.07: Purchases: Emergency. Whenever an emergency arises
which is, or may be a threat to the continued required operations of the wastewater
treatment plants and facilities owned by the Districts, or when purchases are
immediately necessary for the preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the
public health or safety, the Division may purchase supplies, services, materials, or
equipment required for immediate use, in an amount greater than One Hundred
Thousand $100,000.00) Dollars without observing the procedures set forth in this
Resolution. The General Manager or his designee shall advise the District Chair and/or
Vice Chair, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be ratified by the
Board of Directors at its next regular meeting.
Section 3.08: Purchases: Standardized Prices and Specialized Services.
In the purchases of supplies, services, materials, or equipment in which the items to be
purchased have a demonstrated uniformity in price, or it is determined that there is a
sole source, or the provider of services is determined to be uniquely qualified to perform
specialized services, Purchasing may make such purchases without observing the
bidding procedures of Section 3.12 below.
Section 3.09: Purchase Orders. Purchases of all supplies, services,
materials, or equipment shall be made by purchase order and may also require a formal
written contract, when determined necessary or appropriate by the
Contracts/Purchasing Manager. To ensure that all policies and procedures governing
purchase orders and contracts are followed, all contracts or purchase orders will be
executed by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or as delegated by the
Contracts/Purchasing Manager. Purchasing and employees requisitioning supplies
and equipment shall be responsible that purchase orders and requisitions are in
conformity with the spirit and intent of this Resolution and that no purchase has been
broken into smaller units to evade any requirement of this Resolution. Purchasing shall
retain, in its files, one copy of all purchase orders issued during two (2) years
preceding, on which copy of the purchase order, there shall be a list of bidders and
prices bid for the materials or equipment purchased, or if no bids or quotations were
taken or received, a full statement as to the reason therefor.
Section 3.10: Purchases: Encumbrances of Funds. Except in cases of
emergency, no purchase order shall be issued for any supplies, services, materials, or
equipment, unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation balance in the fund
against which said purchase is to be charged.
Section 3.11: Blanket Purchase Orders. The Purchasing Division may
issue annual blanket purchase orders for recurring purchases of miscellaneous supplies
TLW Dn8 No.14:ID21/99d103185-CLEAN
10
` that:
A. Because of economic considerations, the items are not carried in
stock in the District's warehouse;
B. Are stock items that have been designated as appropriate sole
source acquisitions;
C. Purchasing determines it is in the best interests of the District to
competitively bid a blanket order for inventory items; or
D. Are for miscellaneous supplies, services, materials and equipment
where such purchase of supplies, services, materials, and equipment may be procured
from a single vendor during the budget year, without observing the procedures
prescribed in Section 3.12 below, when, in its discretion, it is determined that such
blanket purchase orders are at a cost favorable to the District and will result in more
efficient procurement of such items. Blanket purchase orders shall be in conformity
with the spirit and intent of this Resolution. The Purchasing Division shall, at the
beginning of each budget year, file a list of such purchase orders and the estimated
annual amount with the Director of Finance.
Section 3.12: Bidding Procedure: Purchases Greater Than $50,000.00.
A. Award to Lowest Bidder. Except as otherwise provided in this
Article III, purchases of supplies, services, materials, and equipment of estimated value
greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars shall be by written contract or
purchase order with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder (unless a Request for
Proposal ("UP") solicitation instrument is utilized), pursuant to the procedures
prescribed herein.
B. Award Approval. Purchases of supplies, services, materials, and
equipment that have appropriate budgetary approvals shall be bid and awarded directly
by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or as delegated by the Contracts/Purchasing
Manager. Supplies, services, materials, and equipment that exceed the budgeted
amount, or effect policy recommendations or ratifications, or are sole source contracts
exceeding $100,000.00, and all public works contracts, shall require Board of Directors'
approval prior to issuance or award of a purchase order or contract.
C. Notice Inviting Bids. The notice inviting bids shall include a general
description of the articles or services to be purchased or sold, shall state where bid
forms and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for opening bids.
1. Published Notice. The notice inviting bids shall set a date
TLW Draft No. 14:10121199*103185-CLEAN
11
for the opening of bids. The notice shall be published one (1) time at least ten
(10) days before the date for the opening of the bids. Notice shall be published
In a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the District's
jurisdiction, or by electronic bulletin board procedures designed to reach the
industry or market of supply.
2. Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids, or
receive bids electronically, from all qualified, responsible prospective suppliers
whose names are on the Bidders List maintained by the District, or who have
requested their names to be added thereto.
3. Bulletin Boards. Purchasing may also advertise pending
purchases or sales by a notice posted on a public bulletin board in the
Purchasing Division Office, and by electronic bulletin board, as deemed
appropriate by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager.
D. Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by Purchasing,
bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract specifications or in the public notice
inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to the return of bid security upon the full
execution of an awarded contract or issuance of a purchase order, by the successful
bidder. A successful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to
execute the contract within the prescribed time after the notice of award of contract has
been delivered to bidder, unless the District is responsible for a delay in the prescribed
time. The Board of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to
execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the
Board of Directors awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the
lowest bidder's security equal to the difference between the low bid and the awarded
bid, shall be forfeited to the District, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
E. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed or electronically received bids
shall be submitted to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager and/or Secretary of the Board
of Directors, and shall be identified as a bid on the envelope or the electronic bulletin
board. Bids shall be opened in public by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or his
designated representative, at the time and place stated in the public notices. A
tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular
business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid
opening. In cases wherein the Request for Proposal ("RFP") instrument is utilized, all
RFP's will be opened, and only the name of the Proposer shall be read aloud at the
time and place set forth herein.
F. Rejection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may
reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If all bids are rejected, the
TLW Oral)No.14:1021M:#103185-CLEAN
12
Board of Directors, by majority vote, may declare that the materials or supplies may be
acquired at a lower cost by negotiation in the open market and authorize the purchase
in that manner.
G. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total
amount or unit price, (with quality and service being equal), and if the public interest will
not be best served by a delay of readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may
accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie
bidders at the time of the award.
H. Performance Bonds. Purchasing shall have authority to require a
faithful performance bond, a labor and materials bond and/or a warranty bond, before
entering into a contract in an amount as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the
best interests of the District. If the Purchasing Division requires any of these bonds, the
form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids and in the
contract specifications.
Section 3.13: Purchases between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsections 3.12(A) through 3.12(H) above,
Purchasing may award a contract to purchase supplies, services, materials, or
equipment in an amount greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) and less than One
Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars, without obtaining bids and following the
procedures set forth above when the Contracts/Purchasing Manager determines that:
A. By purchasing immediately, it can avoid an imminent price increase
or realize a substantial price discount that is available on a short term basis only; or
B. It can obtain supply, services, materials, or equipment immediately
that might not otherwise be available at such time as purchasing procedures could be
completed; or
C. Said contract for supplies, services, materials, or equipment has
Board of Directors' approval for multiple one (1) year renewal periods. All such contract
renewals shall require the Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager approval; or
D. The supplies, services, materials, or equipment are only available
from a sole source.
E. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may cause a threat to
the continued required operations of the treatment plants, or when purchases are
immediately necessary for preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the
TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:#103185-CLEAN
13
public health or safety.
All purchases between $50,000.00 and $100,000.00 shall be reviewed and pre-
approved by the General Manager and reported to the Board of Directors on a quarterly
basis.
Section 3.14, Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $50,000.00.
Purchases of supplies, services, materials, or equipment, of an estimated value in the
amount of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars or less on which bidding is not required
by state law, may be made by Purchasing in the open market without observing the
same procedures as prescribed by Section 3.12 above. The procedures to be used for
these purchases are as follows:
A. Minimum Number of Bids. Open market purchase shall, whenever
possible, be based on at least three (3) bids and shall be awarded to the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder, and shall be by written contract or purchase order.
B. Solicitation of Bids. Bids shall be solicited by written requests to
prospective vendors or purchasers and/or by telephone, facsimile transmission,
electronic bulletin board, and/or by public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the
Purchasing Division Offices.
C. Receipt of Bids. Bids shall be submitted to Purchasing, which shall
keep a public record of all open market orders and bids for a period of two (2) years
after the submission of bids or the placing of orders.
D. Exceptions. Purchasing may purchase supplies, services,
materials, or equipment without observing the procedures prescribed in Subparagraphs
A. B, and C above, if supplies, services, materials, or equipment are only available from
a sole source. All such purchases shall be approved by the Director of Finance, the
requesting Department Head, and the Contracts/Purchasing Manager.
Section 3.15. Bidding Procedure: Purchases Less Than $5,000.00.
Purchasing may purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment of a value in the
amount of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars or less per purchase order, without
observing the procedures prescribed in this Section when, in the Contracts/Purchasing
Manager's discretion, it is determined that observing such procedures would not result
in a lower overall cost to the District. Record of such decision shall be fully stated in the
purchase order file as to the reason therefor.
Section 3.16: Inspection and Testing. The supplies, services, materials,
and equipment delivered, and contractual services performed, shall be inspected to
determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the purchase order or
7LW Draft No.14:1021M:*103185-CLEAN
14
contract. Purchasing shall have authority to request professional services, or to require
chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries
which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with specifications.
Section 3.17: Purchases: Negotiated Contracts. Notwithstanding other
provisions of this Resolution, the Board of Directors may, when it appears in the best
interests of the District, authorize the Staff to negotiate and award a contract for
purchase of supplies, services, materials and equipment without observing the
procedures prescribed in Sections 3.12 and 3.14 above.
A. When such authorization has been granted for purchase of
supplies, services, materials, and equipment of an estimated value in the amount of
One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars or greater, the Staff shall obtain the
concurrence of the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as appropriate, prior to awarding
such purchase.
B. Whenever any contract for supplies, services, materials, or
equipment has been entered into between the District and a person or entity providing
such supplies, services, materials, or equipment, and Purchasing determines that it is in
the best interest of the District to continue said contract with such person or entity,
Purchasing may, in its discretion, negotiate an extension of such contract without
observing the bidding procedures prescribed in Sections 3.12 and 3.14 above;
provided, the contract contains provisions for subsequent extension periods; has been
approved and awarded by the Board of Directors; and/or has prior budget approval, as
provided in Section 3.12.
C. This Section shall not apply to the letting of public works
construction contracts in excess of Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars. Said
contracts shall be governed by the provisions set forth in Article V of this Resolution.
Section 3.18: Surplus Supplies, Materials, and Equipment. All
Departments and/or Divisions shall submit to Purchasing, at such times and in such
form as Purchasing shall prescribe, reports showing all supplies, materials, and/or
equipment which are no longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out.
Purchasing shall have authority, as deemed appropriate by the Contracts/Purchasing
Manager, to sell, exchange for, or trade in on new supplies, materials, and equipment,
or dispose or, as deemed appropriate, all supplies, materials, and equipment which
cannot be used by any other Department or Division, or which have become unsuitable
for District's use.
TLW Deft No.14:1021M.#103185-CLEAN
15
Section 3.19: Sale of Real Property. No real property of the District may
be sold, or any negotiations leading to such sale may be made, without prior approval
of the Board of Directors.
Section 3.20: Recordkeeping: A record of all sales or surplus property and
by-products shall also be maintained by Purchasing upon or in which is maintained the
record of the bids received for the property or by-products sold, or if bids were not taken
or received, a full explanation thereof. Such records shall be maintained for two (2)
years after the sale.
ARTICLE IV
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
Section 4.01: Purpose and Scope. The Orange County Sanitation District,
in the interest of uniformity, fairness and cost effectiveness desires to establish policies
and procedures for the selection and procurement of professional engineering,
architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services.
Section 4.02: Retention of Professional Technical Consultants. This
Resolution establishes a procedure to be followed in the seiection and retention of
Professional Technical Consultants in the areas of engineering, architecture,
environmental, land surveying, construction management services and related services.
Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or firs providing
engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those
professional services associated with research, development, design and construction,
alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of
these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform,
including studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning,
programming, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates,
inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation
and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are
excluded.
It is recognized that no two individuals or firs have equal skills, training, or
experience and that the qualities of such persons vary. Accordingly, Professional
Technical Consultants shall be selected based upon the District's discretion and opinion
TLW Draft No.14:1=1199:0103185.CLEAN
16
as to which particular consultant is best qualified to perform the work (hereinafter
referred to as "projects") in question.
For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any individual, firm,
partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice
the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or
construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will
include but not be limited to the following:
A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its
members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references
from persons of known repute.
B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be
registered in the State of California, as required by law.
C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years'
recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project.
D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at
least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the
project.
E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the
prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm.
F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local
based firm when more than one firm is being considered,
G. If the project is funded, either in whole or in part, by federal funds
that require, as a condition of establishing or maintaining eligibility for federal funds, that
firms working on the project maintain an affirmative action employment program, then
the firm selected for the project must certify to having such a program.
The District also recognizes that the scope of services and the qualifications of
consultants can differ significantly between major capital facilities projects and small
capital projects. The criteria set forth in Paragraphs C and D above may be waived by
District for small capital projects,
The procedures set forth in this Resolution shall govern the retention of such
professional consultants.
Section 4.03: Small Capital Project: Defined. "Small capital project" is
defined as a miscellaneous capital improvement or facility modification, replacement, or
TLW Draft No.14:1021/99:#103185-CLEAN
17
repair project, related to plant safety, reliability and efficiency enhancements where
professional consulting services are estimated to be in an amount not to exceed
$50,000.00 for each project.
Section 4.04: Small Capital Project:Approval of Plans and Specifications.
The Board of Directors delegates to the Director of Engineering, as Professional
Registered Engineer, the authority to approve the design, plans, and specifications for
construction of new or modified District facilities that is deemed a small capital project,
as defined in Section 4.03 above.
Section 4.05: Small Capital Project: Annual Budget Approval. Upon
approval by the Board of Directors of an annual budget, the District's Staff shall be
authorized to solicit contract proposals from professional engineering, architectural,
environmental, land surveying and construction management firms to perform the
required services for the approved small capital projects, as defined and prescribed
herein.
Section 4.06: Small Capital Project: Selection of Consultants— Procedure.
A. District's staff shall compile a master pre-approved list of 5-10 firms
having the required expertise to perform the required professional service for a small
project. The master list of firms will be selected based upon a solicitation, review of
qualifications, and Board approval. The original term of the agreement shall be for one
(1) year. Thereafter, the Department Director shall be authorized to recommend to the
General Manager, an extension of the professional consulting services agreement for
up to two (2) additional one (1)-year renewal periods, for a total of three (3) years, with
each of the parties designated on the approved master list. The professional consulting
services agreement for each party on the master list shall be forwarded to the
purchasing office. The Engineering Department Staff shall prepare the appropriate
requisition documentation to insure future payment to the consultant.
B. As a need for an individual specific project arises, the District will
implement the Agreement by issuing a task order identifying the specific project by
name and number and including the approved scope of work required of the consultant
for the project. The scope of work for any individual task order, shall not entail a cost in
excess of$50,000.00. There is a maximum annual limitation of$200,000.00 for each
individual consultant purchase order under the provisions of this Section 4.06.
C. The Department Director shall first obtain at least two (2) price
proposals from consultants before the task order is awarded to a consultant. This
requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Department Director where a
determination is made that the subject work is unique such that only one (1) consultant
is available to perform the work, or where significant time constraints or emergency
conditions dictate that one (1) consultant be solicited for a price proposal. The
TLW Draft No.16:1021I99:A107185-CLEAN
18
Department Director, or his designee, shall review the proposals specifically addressing
cost and ability to meet District schedule requirements. Based on the evaluations, the
Department Director is authorized to award the task order.
D. Once the consultant is selected for the award of a small capital
project and the task order is executed by the District, the Department Director shall
issue the notice to proceed.
E. Addenda to a particular task order shall be approved by the
General Manager. However, the amount for each addendum may not exceed
$50,000.00, and the cumulative total for all addenda may not exceed $50,000.00. The
Department Director shall issue the task order addendum in letter form.
Section 4.07: Major and Minor Capital Projects: Defined. "Major capital
project" means the construction, repair, modification, or rehabilitation of the District's
Capital Facilities, including treatment plants, trunk sewers, pump stations, ocean ouffall,
administrative and support facilities, and other facilities related to District operations,
where the cost of professional technical consulting services are estimated to be in an
amount in excess of$50,000.00 for any project. These projects may require Selection
Committee or Board approvals.
Specialty-item capital projects are defined as projects other than Small Capital
Projects, as defined in Sections 4.03 through 4.06, inclusive, where the cost of
professional technical consulting services are estimated to be in an amount more than
$50,000.00, and less than or equal to $100,000.00 and require only General Manager
approval. Requirements for Scope of Work, Proposal, Procurement and Negotiation
Agreement Continuation of Services, Agreement of Services, and Conflict of Interest
apply for both Major Capital Projects and Specialty-Item Capital Projects, with
difference only in authorization levels.
Section 4.08: Major Capital Project: Scope of Work.
A. For every project approved by the Board of Directors and for which
outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of
work.
B. The scope shall define the extent of the services and the time
required.
Section 4.09: Major Capital Project: Selection of Consultants - Procedure.
For the employment of any professional consulting services for major capital projects,
the following procedures shall apply:
7LW Draft No.14:102IM:A103185-CLEAN
19
A. Proposals - Notice Requesting. Staff shall prepare a Request for
Proposal ("RFP") or a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for the scope of work which
shall include a request for the firm's qualifications, personnel capability, demonstration
of firm's capabilities, identification of personnel assigned to the project, estimate of
number of hours for each aspect of the project, fee proposals and conflict of interest
disclaimer. The Request for Qualifications' process may be used, at Staffs discretion,
to narrow the field of firms submitting proposals on the project.
District shall maintain a comprehensive list of professional
consultants' demonstrated competence. Notice shall be mailed to all firms requesting
notice of any RFP or RFQ issued by the District. Optionally, notice may be given by
publication in professional journals or publications of general circulation.
B. Staff Screening Committee. A screening committee of at least two
(2) staff members as chosen by the Department Director shall review all submitted
proposals and prepare a recommendation for selection of the best qualified consultant
to the Selection Committee, as described in Paragraph D below.
C. Proposals - Contents. Proposals submitted shall:
1. Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the
services required.
2. Include a description of the firm's qualifications for
performing the proposed work.
3. In the case of a proposal for construction management
services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out
on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project
design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid
evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and
negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction
project.
4. Include past performance records of the firm.
5. Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work
within the time allotted.
6. Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the
project.
TLW Draft No. 14:1021/99:#103195.CLEAN
20
7. Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each
aspect of the scope of work for such personnel.
8. Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which
shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. Thereafter, it
shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. The form of the fee proposal
shall be as described in Subsections F2 and F3 below.
9. Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer.
10. Provide any other information required to property evaluate
the firm's qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to
the project.
TLW Draft No. 10:1021M:t103185.CLEAN
21
D. Selection Committee- Membership.
1. The members of the Board of Directors Standing Committee
principally responsible for the project and contract under consideration for
approval shall constitute the Selection Committee for District projects.
2. At the discretion of the District Chair, additional Directors may
be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for
specific projects.
E. Review of Proposals by Staff Committee and Selection Committee.
1. The Staff Committee shall review each proposal and the
qualifications of each firm with due consideration of office location, reputation in
the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on
similar-type projects, the project approach, understanding of the scope of work,
financial standing, number of qualified personnel and their availability for the
project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project
being considered.
2. The Staff Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of
all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide
the services sought by the District based on their demonstrated competence and
qualifications.
3. The Staff Committee, upon making a determination of the
fully qualified firms, shall rank the firms considered, in order of preference, based
upon the qualification of each, as described in Subparagraph E(1) above.
Thereafter the Committee shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified
firms. Based upon the fee proposal, the committee may recommend to the
Selection Committee or the Board of Directors an individual or firm for award of
the contract. The recommended individual or firm can be ranked lower than
firms with higher fee proposals.
4. The Selection Committee shall receive and review the
recommendation of the Staff Committee and either award or recommend to the
Board of Directors, either the approval or disapproval of the Staff
recommendation to award a contract, as authorized in Section 4.10 below.
F. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm
to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures
will be strictly adhered to:
TLW Draft No.14:10121199:k103185-CLEAN
22
1. The Staff Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that
is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Staff Committee.
2. The proposal for fees associated with the services as
submitted by the selected firm shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the
Staff Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the
scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly identified the
efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work
required.
3. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a
maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum
(fixed) fee.
4. If it is the decision of the Staff Committee to use methods for
compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum,
or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be
made by the Staff Committee in its recommendation to the Selection Committee
and the Board of Directors.
5. The Staff Committee shall review the compensation
requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as
previously established.
6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Selection
Committee and Board of Directors, shall be certified by the Staff Committee as
reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for
the firm.
7. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be
terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked firm.
B. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis,
and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with
another.
G. Continuation of Services-
1. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily
completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board determines
that it is in the best interests of the District to retain the same firm for subsequent
phases of related work, the Staff Committee or the Selection Committee may be
TUN Daft No.14:1021/994103185-CLEAN
23
authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional
work.
2. Continuation of services may arise when a firm has
completed a feasibility report or a preliminary engineering report and the services
for said work are satisfactory to the Board and the procedure of examining other
firms for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary or cost effective.
3. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be
concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and
the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply.
H. Specialized Services.
1. In the event that specialized services are required where it is
determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a
speck project for professional fees estimated to be in an amount greater than
$50,000.00, the Staff Committee will report to the Selection Committee said
findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized
firm.
2. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual
under Subparagraph H(1) above, along with the negotiated fee, shall be
presented to the Board of Directors for consideration.
I. Agreement for Services.
1. Upon approval by the Board of a negotiated agreement for
professional services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the
General Counsel.
2. The contract shall include, but not be limited to the following
terms:
(a) A statement of the scope of the project.
(b) The basis and individual elements of the fees.
(c) The basis for payment to the firm.
(d) The time limits in which the services must be performed.
TLW Draft No.14:10121994103195-CLEAN
24
(a) Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes
in the scope of work.
(f) If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the
District may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss
because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time
limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such
nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by
the Committee.
(g) For projects exceeding $50,000.00 in fees or in other
cases as determined by the District, errors and omissions insurance in an
amount recommended by the General Counsel (based upon engineering
data from the Department Director) shall be required, unless the Standing
Committee or Board of Directors, as the case may be, waives said
insurance.
For projects that involve small engineering studies where a
consultant is asked to provide a report not related or leading directly to a
design project, the General Manager (based upon engineering data from
the Department Director), in his discretion, may waive the requirement for
the consultant to provide errors and omissions/professional liability
insurance.
J. Conflict of Interest.
1. The District maintains a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant
to California Government Code Section 87100 at seq., which governs the
activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees, or agents in the
conduct of project work for the District.
2. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept
rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or
firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified fine to
provide professional consulting services to the District. Acceptance of food and
refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of
gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if
said items exceed $290.00, or the amount as fixed by Government Code Section
89503, or California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 18940-1, in a calendar
year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from
participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of
Interest Code; and provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent,
as a designated employee under the Districts Conflict of Interest Code, shall
TLW Dwft No. 14:1021/99a107185-CLEAN
25
report any amount of gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as
required by said Code.
3. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that
violates the District's Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified.
Section 4.10: Major Capital Project: Award of Professional Services
Agreements.
A. Primary Agreement. The award and execution of an agreement for
professional consulting services on behalf of the District shall be made in accordance
with the following delegations of authority:
Authorizing Authority Authorized Action
1. Department Heads Solicitation of Requests for
Qualifications ("RFQ") and Requests for
Proposals (RFP").
2. General Manager Authorization to evaluate proposals and
to execute contracts up to $100,000.
3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and
Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve Profes-
(Committees) sional Services Agreements of over
$100,000.00 up to $200,000.00.
4. Board of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff,
General Manager and Committee, and
approve Professional Services
Agreements for over $200,000.00.
B. Primary Agreement -Addenda. The award and execution of an
addendum to an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the District
shall be made in accordance with the following:
Authorizing Authority Authorized Action
1. Department Head Authority to negotiate addenda and make
recommendation to General Manager.
2. General Manager Receive recommendation of
Department Head and approve contract
TLW Draft No.14:102IM:0103185.CLEAN
26
changes in an amount up to
$100,000.00 per addendum. The total
additive value of all addenda shall not
exceed $100,000.00.
3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and
Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve contract
Committee) changes between $100,000.00 and
$200,000.00. The total additive value of
all addenda shall not exceed
$200,000.00.
4. Board of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff,
General Manager and Committee and
approve contract changes in amounts
over$200,000.00 for each change order
and cumulatively for the agreement.
Section 4.11: Major Capital Project: Approval of Plans and Specifications.
The procedure and authority for the approval of the design plans and specifications for
construction of new or modified District's major capital projects is as follows:
A. For any project with approved budget authority, the Director of
Engineering is authorized to advertise for construction bids, set a bid date, and receive
all bids.
B. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction
contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design
engineer is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the
Director of Engineering may advertise for bids, and upon receipt, the lowest responsive
bid of a responsible bidder will be submitted to the Board of Directors for approval.
C. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction
contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design
engineer, is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director
of Engineering shall submit the project to the Standing Committee for recommendation,
and based thereon, to the Board of Directors for approval.
D. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the
lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is equal to or less than the approved
construction budget for the project, the bid will be submitted to the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors, upon receipt of the bid, shall approve the plans and
specifications of the project and may award a contract.
nW Dmft No.14:10121M:01031B5-CLEAN
27
E. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the
lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is greater than the approved construction
budget for the project, Staff shall present the bid and a recommendation to the Standing
Committee for review and recommendation to the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE V
PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
Section 5.01 Purpose and Scope. Public works contracts are herein
defined as contracts with duly licensed contractors in the State of California for the
furnishing of labor, materials, equipment and permits, as deemed necessary, for the
erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal facilities, and any other public building, structure or
improvement necessary to the operation of the District, in an amount greater than
Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars, as per California Public Contracts Code
Sections 20783 at seq.
Section 5.02: Public Works: Bidding Required. When the expenditure
required for a public works construction project exceeds Thirty-Five Thousand
($35,000.00) Dollars, it shall be contracted for and let to the lowest responsible bidder,
in accordance with the provisions of California Public Contracts Code Section 20783.
Section 5.03: Bidding Procedure: Public Works Construction Greater Than
$35,000.00. Procedures for soliciting bids and awarding contracts for public works
projects for more than Thirty-Five Thousand ($35,000.00) Dollars, shall be by written
contract with the lowest responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures prescribed
herein and in accordance with applicable provisions of California Public Contracts
Code Section 20783.
A. Notice Inviting Bids. The Notice Inviting Bids shall specifically
describe the work to be performed, shall state where bid forms, Specifications, and
General and Special Provisions may be secured, and the time and place for receiving
and opening sealed bids.
1. Published Notice. The Notice Inviting Bids shall set a date
for the opening of bids. The first publication or posting of the Notice shall be at
least ten (10) calendar days before the date for the opening of the bids. The
Notice shall be published at least two (2) times, not less than five (5) days apart,
in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the District.
TLW Draft No. 14:102V99:#103185.CLEAN
28
2. Mailed Notice. Unless the work to be done is proprietary,
the Notice Inviting Bids shall be published in a public newspaper which carries
Orange County public works bid notices, not less than twenty-one (21) calendar
days before the date of opening of bids.
TLW Draft No, 14'.101211991103185-CLEAN
29
3. Bidders List. The Engineering Department may also solicit
sealed bids from all qualified, responsible, prospective suppliers whose names
are on a Bidders List that may be maintained by District.
B. Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by the Purchasing
Division, bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract Specifications and in the
public Notice Inviting Bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security, upon full
execution by the successful bidder of an awarded contract by the District. A successful
bidder shall forfeit its bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within
the prescribed time after the Notice of Award of Contract has been delivered to the
bidder, unless the District is responsible for the delay in the prescribed time. The Board
of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract,
award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the Board of Directors
awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the lowest bidder's security
equal to the difference in an.amount between the low bid and the awarded bid, shall be
forfeited to the District, and the surplus, if any, shall be retumed to the lowest bidder.
C. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the
Director of Engineering or Contracts/Purchasing Manager, or their designees, and
Secretary of the Board of Directors, and shall be identified as a bid, on the envelope.
Bids shall be opened by the Director of Engineering or Contracts/Purchasing Manager,
or their designee, in public, at the time and place stated in the public notice. A
tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular
business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid
opening.
D. Rejection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may
reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If, after the opening of bids,
all bids are rejected, the Board of Directors, on a Resolution adopted by a four-fifths
(4/5) vote, may declare that the work can be performed more economically by force
account, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in the open market and
may have the work done in a manner stated in the Resolution in order to take
advantage of this lower cost.
E. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total
amount or unit price (with quality and service being equal) and if the public interest will
not be best served by a delay or readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may
accept the one it chooses, or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie
bidders at the time of the award.
F. No Bids. If no bids are received, the District may have the work
done by force account; may readvertise for bids pursuant to the procedures herein; or
may select a contractor by negotiation.
TLW Draft No.14:10,21/99:0103185-CLEAN
30
G. Emergencies. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may be,
a threat to the continued operation of the wastewater facilities, support facilities and/or
administrative facilities operated by the District, a contract for the repair or replacement
of the public facility may be ordered by the General Manager without complying with the
provisions of this Resolution or the California Public Contracts Code. This authority is
hereby delegated to the General Manager, or his designee, by the Board of Directors
pursuant to the authority of California Public Contracts Code Section 22050. In such
event, the General Manager shall advise the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as
appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be confirmed by a four-fifths (4/5)
vote of the Board of Directors at its next regular meeting.
H. Surety Bonds. The Purchasing Division shall require a Faithful
Performance Bond and a Labor and Materials Bond. A Warranty Bond may be required
before entering into a contract in an amount up to one hundred (100%) percent of the
amount of the contract, as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best
interests of the District. The form and amount of the bond shall be described in the
Notice Inviting Bids, or in the contract Specifications.
I. Cost Records. Cost records shall be kept in the manner provided
in Sections 4000 to 4007, inclusive, of the California Government Code.
Section 5.04: Approval of Original Construction Contract Agreement and
Change Orders to Construction Agreements. The procedure and authority for the
approval of the original construction contract agreements and change orders to
construction agreements is as follows:
A. General Manager. The General Manager is authorized to approve
an original construction contract agreement in an amount not to exceed $100,000.00,
and any change order, with a total amount of the change order additions (not the net
amount of the change order), not to exceed $100,000.00, and a total cumulative
amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original
agreement amount, or$100,000.00, whichever is less.
B. Planning Design & Construction Committee. The Planning,
Design & Construction Committee is authorized to approve an original construction
contract agreement in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00, and any change order,
with a total amount of the change order additions (not the net amount of the change
order), not to exceed $200,000.00, and a total cumulative amount for all change order
additions to the agreement not to exceed 10% of the original agreement amount, or
$200,000.00. whichever is less.
TLW Draft No.14:10121199:i103195•CLEAN
31
C. Management and Staff. At such time as the Staff becomes aware
of a fact or circumstance that will likely result in total additive change orders exceeding
5% percent of the original contract amount, it shall be presented to the Planning,
Design & Construction Committee at its next regular meeting for review, consideration,
and possible action.
ARTICLE VI
MEETINGS (AND RELATED TRAVEL) AND
TRAINING (AND RELATED TRAVEL) EXPENDITURES
Section 6.01: Purpose and Scope. This Article sets forth the procedures
and scope of delegated authority by which District employees are authorized to incur
expenses for budget-approved meetings and training in furtherance of District business.
Section 6.02: General.
A. Meetings or training exceeding $500.00 will be itemized, as well as
possible, in the approved budget. It is recognized that some meetings and training
cannot be preplanned.
B. All out-of-country travel (excluding Canada and Mexico) requires
approval by the Board of Directors.
C. Meetings or training requests exceeding $2,000.00 will be
approved by the Department Director.
D. Meetings or training requests less than $2,000.00 will be approved
by the Division Manager.
E. Established approvals must be received prior to arrangements for
meetings or training being made.
Section 6.03: Policies and Procedures. All policies and procedures
governing meetings and training, such as the use of District forms and justification, will
be followed.
TLW Draft No. 141 WV99:R103185-CLEAN
32
ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.01: Noncompliance. Any transaction failing to comply with this
Resolution in any respect is voidable in the discretion of the Board of Directors, and any
employee willfully and knowingly violating any provision of this Resolution may be
subject to disciplinary action.
Section 7.02: Severability, If any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the
entire Resolution or any of the remaining portions thereof. The Board of Directors
hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution, and each section,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact
that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 7.03: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon adoption by the Board of Directors.
Section 7.04: Repeal of Prior Resolutions. Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8,
OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-21, and OCSD 98-43 are hereby repealed in their entirety.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held
, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
TLW Draft No. 14 10121199'.#103185-CLEAN
33
+ BOARD OF DIRECTORS VW,ngData I Toed.moo-.
nmisa
AGENDA REPORT Item Nu ItamNumbar
e
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Nelson
Communications Group for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, adding
a public health element to the existing public information program for an additional
amount of$71,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $275,895, with Orange
County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the
additional amount of$35,500.
SUMMARY
In June of 1999, a Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications
Group (NCG) was awarded by the Board of Directors providing for public relations
services for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the Groundwater
Replenishment System.
To enhance community education and outreach efforts for the Groundwater
Replenishment System, staff recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with NCG be approved. Addendum No. 1 provides for the addition
of a communications program specifically targeted at health and environmental
professionals. The program would work in concert with and be managed by NCG's
current program and would focus on seeking out the active involvement of university-
associated medical and environmental personnel to help lead the public health portion
of the Groundwater Replenishment System's Phase III Public Information Program.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The PSA Addendum amount and budget necessary for this project are presented in the
attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORF Water Management Projects, a)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
H.M tlhWGa,dadgard Agenda Rlp mkl adJ Road Agenda Rep dati 11 RRd-1B LLx
R-Aad.. � Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1
A major goal of the GWR System's public information program is gaining support for the
project from environmental academia and the medical/healthcare community. They are
highly credible sources on water and health issues with both the media and the public.
McDaniel Lambert, Inc. was one of the firms that submitted a proposal for Phase III of
the GWR System Public Information Program. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. was not chosen
because, while it was very strong in its area of expertise of communicating to medical
and environmental audiences, it was weaker in other areas determined vital to the
public information program.
The firm, however, offers some unique qualifications that were explored by staff and
NCG after the final Phase III selection was made. McDaniel Lambert's principals
include Mary McDaniel, an occupational physician and lawyer who would serve as
project manager, and Dr. Charles Lambert, a toxicologist who has ties and relationships
with various local universities. They bring together a unique combination of expertise,
communication skills and field experience in health, environmental relations and conflict
resolution, as well as experience and contacts within these areas in Orange County.
Additionally, Mary McDaniel is an expert and lecturer on the Peter M. Sandman
strategies for responding to community outrage and risk communications. NCG is in
agreement with the addition of the Mary McDaniel team to the overall project education
and outreach effort. For clarity and direction, staff believes NCG should manage the
science, health and environmental effort.
In August, the Joint Cooperative Committee authorized staff to solicit a proposal from
NCG to develop a communications program focused on environmental, health and
medical audiences.
ALTERNATIVES
Any alternative action would require consideration by the Joint Cooperative Committee
and the OCWD Board.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
H Mip.Em W. al Apxtla Rv VIM R %110. ldd
Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE)
Groundwater Replenishment System
JOB /CONTRACT NO. J-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASN AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%)
Pro'ea Development S 700.000 S 700.000 $ 700.0D0 S 700,000 S 700.000 $ 7W000 100%
Design Staff $ 2,349,000 $ 2.349,000 S 2.349,000 S 2.349.0D0 S 2,349,000 S 200.000 9%
Design Consultant
PSAs S 7,500.000 S 7.500.000 S 7,500,000 S 2.405.150 $ 35.500 S 2.440.650 $ 100.000 4%
Construction(Other) $ 2,653.900 $ 2.653.900 $ 2.653.900 $rS5.4
$
Construction Staff $ 9.345. 00 S 9.345,600 $ 9,345,600 $ $
Construction Contract S 86,481.500 $ 86.481.500 S 86.481,500 S
Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 12.895.000 S 12.895.000 $ S
TOTAL $ 121.925.000 $ 121.925,000 $ - $ 121,925.000 35.500001 S 5.489,650 S 1,0N, 18%
by desenawm.Wua9.t tame
Fmm R.. .E IVI rres
FAHRCOMMITTEE Maeln9Da[e roae.orwr.
11/10/99 11/1]/99
AGENDA REPORT IFm�Ru�m� Iem Number
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE
ORDINANCE
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-11, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing
Ordinance No. OCSD-09:
a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 2, 1999.
b. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1125 is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that
the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and
maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of
service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in
the comprehensive Master Plan.
C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-11 by title only and waive reading of
said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance
must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.)
d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSDA 1, and pass to second reading
and public hearing on December 15, 1999.
SUMMARY
Last month the Committee considered and approved some clarification to Ordinance
No. OCSD-09 which established the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Program for
1999-2000. While General Counsel and staff were preparing those approved
clarifications for Board consideration, we discovered additional issues. These are
described in the attached memorandum from General Counsel and are highlighted in
the proposed Ordinance through strikeout and bold typefaces.
�amiws %ag. am rdre aew^s11M emm Agwda aepw 11aane,,,Vaoc
Re.. aaaae Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
General Counsel will present an oral report at the meeting.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. General Counsel Memo
2. Draft Ordinance
Yrtl W.d1Y.y.WVp�q.�N/�.Ma Ra %'M a—,/gwry R. 111�17he
" ° ^ Page 2
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY
CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
OCSD-09
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a
management report, including financial and system facilities needs of the District,
and wishes to reaffirm the policy of the District of imposing Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges when properties, either newly connect to the District's system
or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District, and to
adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this
Ordinance.
The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby
FIND:
A. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities
entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989",
hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering
reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of
the Predecessor Districts in 1989, identifying the required future development of
District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to
all properties within the District's service areas; and,
B. That the District has undertaken, commencing in 1997, a
comprehensive update and revision of the Master Plan, which was adopted
October 27, 1999, to hereafter be known as the "Strategic Plan"; and,
C. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies,
undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial
needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and
categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the
system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total
costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate
methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain
access to the system; and,
D. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted
Ordinances, commencing in 1969, established Capital Facilities Capacity
Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or "fees" to be paid
by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system as a financial
TFN:pl:#112779:11/10199-REDLINE 1
payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the
system, and for future facilities to be constructed; and,
E. That the District's connection charge ordinances, included authority
for the District to levy an excess capacity charge upon commercial and industrial
users who discharge large quantities or high strength wastewater; and,
F. That the District(s) adopted a revised, comprehensive excess
capacity charge by ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, which ordinance(s) was
subsequently repealed November 15, 1995 pending completion of the Financial
Rates and Charges Report; and,
G. That the District on February 22, 1996 adopted a moratorium on the
collection of excess capacity charges until the Financial Rates and Charges
Report was completed and a revised Capital Facilities Charge was adopted; and,
b H. That a final report (the "Determination of Financial Rates and
Charges Report"), based upon studies and reports of District's engineering and
financial advisors, and an extensive evaluation by an Advisory Committee of
industrial, commercial, and residential users of the system (the "Rate Advisory
Committee"), was prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors to assist and
guide it in its considerations for the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09; and,
J. I. That the Report has been made available to the public and has
been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of
law; and,
lf.J. That following adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 on July 21,
1999, certain ambiguities and uncertainties were discovered, relating to the
implementation of the Ordinance. It is now appropriate, to insure ease of
administration and clarity of understanding by those persons and entities
governed by the Ordinance, that the provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 be
revised; and,
l:. K. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance
will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and
operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the
TFN:pj.#112779:11/10/99-REDLINE 2
District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or
state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities,
together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and,
M. L. That the properties upon which the fees established by this
Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection,
treatment and disposal system facilities; that the costs of owning, operating, and
maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased
regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs
will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said
property; and,
N.M. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges imposed by authority
of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide
access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as
provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and,
Q N. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as
applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis
between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the
service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and,
R.0. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment
pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section
21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Definitions
1.1 "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities
necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing,
planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property,
construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair.
1.2 "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non-
discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the
District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use
is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence
at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in
the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The Supplemental
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 6, 7, and 8 of this
Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual
basis as determined by the District.
TFN:pj:#112779:11110199-REDLINE 3
1.3 "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to
physically connect a property to the District's system, including, but not limited to
installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines and appurtenances to make the
connection, that does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and
overhead for the installation of those facilities.
1.4 "Nondiscriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same
objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non-public
users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's
facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the
proportionate share of use of those facilities.
1.5 "Predecessor Districts" means former County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, which jointly
owned and administered the property and sewerage system facilities of the
District, which consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District, as a
single entity, effective July 1, 1998.
1.6 "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the
State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county,
city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political
entity, subdivision or public corporation of this State.
Section 2: Connection Permits: Required.
A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings and
structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system
facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage
facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to
the District's facilities.
B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose
Discharge Permit under sections 305-305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or as
amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service
agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless
the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the
boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency
authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit as
authorized above may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries
of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the
issuance of such permit.
7FN:pj:#112779:11110199-REDLINE 4
There will be a nondiscriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's
sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained.
Section 3: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No
application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any
sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be
approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an
established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit
issued which establishes the category of use of said property.
Section 4: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment.
4.1 Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by
this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be
required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within
the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the
requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and
prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within
the territorial limits of the District.
4.2 Upon application of any property seeking to connect to the District's
system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and
upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California
Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property
owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a
period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid
balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and
interest shall constitute a lien on the property.
Section 5: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts.
Every person or entity newly connecting any property to the District's system
facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the
applicable category of use set forth in Table 1.
TFN:pj:#112779:11110199•REDLINE 5
TABLE 1
CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE
Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge
Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet
Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110'
Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675'
High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600'2
Single Family Residential Per Unit
5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530
4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1.475
1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130
Multi-Family Residential Per Unit
4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1.620
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275
1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910
Studio Per Unit $ 580
' Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be
$1,820;and all calculations shall be on a per square foot basis.
'The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at$1,600 per 1,000 square feet, but
shall be incrementally increased from the present amount at five(5)levels, and five(5)time
periods as follows:
Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective January 1,2000 $ 900 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective July 1,2000 $1,130 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective July 1,2001 $1,600 per 1,000 sq. ft.
A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office
of the Board Secretary of the District,and in the Building Department of each City within the
DistricL
'Low Demand connections are the following categories of users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking
Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and
other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categores.
**High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets;
Car Washes; Coin Laundnes; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food
Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in
volume to these listed categories.
—All other connections are Average demand users.
TFN:pj:C112779:11110IN-REDLINE 6
Section 6: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Sign cant
Commercial— Industrial Users—Definitions.
A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person
or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding
domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"),
or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or
Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to
obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01,
Article 3, due to having federally-or District-regulated or significant discharges.
B. An Existing SCIU is any SCIU discharger connected and
discharging to the District's system prior to My 9, 1995 January 1, 2000.
C. A New SCIU is any discharger who connects and discharges to the
District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or-#OFMY 4
3999 January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in
Subparagraph A above, but, subsequent to July 4, 4995 January 1, 2000,
increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU.
€, D. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Section 5 Table 1 above, is
25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base
use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this
Subparagraph E, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7 or Section 8
hereof.
F, E. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of
flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of July-1 4999 January 1,
2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for the fiscal year 1998-99
or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative
of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who
are deemed to be SCIUs solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste
Discharge Permit pursuant to Section 6 above, shall have a minimum baseline
established as follows: Flow — 25,000 gallons per day; BOD —150 pounds per
day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge
flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge.
TFN:pj:#112779:11110M-REDLINE 7
44. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge as prescribed
by Sections 7 and 8 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date
of this Ordinance.
l* G. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to
the SClll of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal the
District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General
Manager, or his delegated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon
extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not
representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly
period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent
basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager.
The decision of the General Manager shall be final.
Section 7. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New aad
Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to
the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for
commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIUs aad—all
shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the
base use discharge maximums, in the following amounts:
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
Section 8: Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing
Significant Commercial— Industrial Users.
A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to
and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase
of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its
established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase of
either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day,
whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization.
B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the
following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section
8A above:
TFN:pI:#11277#:11/10199-REDLINE 8
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
C. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be
calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the
User's baseline. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a
year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District.
Section 9: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures.
For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the
category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit
amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to
a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 that would be for the prior category of use
which was terminated and removed.
Section 10: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures.
In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to
which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category
of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the
District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set
forth in Table 1, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for the
prior category of use.
Section 11: Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site
Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A
charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the
District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement
Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner,
shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a
Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in
said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still
in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3 and 4 hereinabove, established for
property connecting to said facilities.
Section 12: No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
is paid for the connection of a specific parcel of property. No refund of any
charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason.
The connection permit is non-transferable to any other property.
TFN:pj:#112779:11Ho/99•REDLINE 9
Section 13: Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge
of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing
baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying
the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 7 above.
Section 14 : Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to
all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise
deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the
State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies
or tax-exempt organizations.
Section 15: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the
remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons
or other circumstances, shall not be affected.
Section 16 : Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1,
2000.
Section 17: Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-09 is hereby repealed as of
the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 18 : Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board
shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-
thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a
Regular Meeting held
Chair, Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
Thomas L. Woodruff, District Counsel
TFN:pI:*112779:1 W0199-REDLINE 10
BOARD WORKSHOP rnamnq Date Taed.of Dlr.
11110,99 11/jL
AGENDA REPORT Iem Rem Nombe
5 to
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services
Originator: Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist
SUBJECT: BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS: YAKIMA COMPOSTING
FACILITY, TULE RANCH/MAGAN RANCH
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve an Agreement for: a) the purchase of the 1,808.15 acre portion of Tula
Ranch/Magan Ranch located in Kings County for an amount not to exceed $3,254,400; b) a
three-year option to purchase the 4026.58 acre portion of Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch located
in Kern County for an amount not to exceed $4,545,600 contingent on obtaining all
necessary permits for an open-air compost facility on Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch, or upon
the District's discretion; and c) the retention of Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch to manage a
portion of the District's biosolids for a term of three (3) years for a fee of$22.40 per wet ton
on the Kings County acreage and $22.40 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory
compliance fees on the Kern County acreage for an annual amount not to exceed
$2,540,000 for both Kings and Kern Counties Class B biosolids' land application.
2. Approve an Agreement with the Yakima Company that provides for. a)the reservation of
100,D00 wet tons per year of capacity for compost and storage in consideration of the
payment of$1,250,000 upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary permits for an
open-air compost facility; b) the ability to use the Yakima Company's land application sites
for up to 100 wet tons per day of Class B biosolids at$25.00 per wet ton, plus Kern County
regulatory compliance fees, by the Yakima Company on their permitted sites in Kern County
during the compost site permitting and development period for an annual amount not to
exceed$775,000; c)the ability to land apply District's-produced Class A EO biosolids'for
$25.D0 per wet ton for an annual amount not to exceed $625,000; d)the payment of a
composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton plus a prorated share of the
annual permit fees for ten years at an annual amount not to exceed $2,625,000; and e) the
acquisition of a Site Purchase Option to purchase all or a portion of the compost site for a
price to be determined at the time of the transaction.
SUMMARY
Staff is proposing that the District's Board of Directors enter into agreements with Tula Ranch
and the Yakima Company in order to insure reliable and cost-effective long-term management
of the District's biosolids. Biosolids reuse options available for the management of the southern
California agencies' biosolids needs are becoming insufficient as a result of increased
regulatory requirements, including complete bans on Class B biosolids land application. The
action proposed is required in order to secure capacity with two viable biosolids management
options currently available.
•Definitions of Class B, Class A,and Exceptional Quality(EQ)Biosolids can be found on page 7 of this Agenda
Report.
HF ftSeaMa MA,e Repam\1BN Beaty♦ae.Re�\11aeJlam ISM
RSMW arms, Page 1
The proposal requests an initial capital investment of$3,254,400 to purchase the Kings County 1
portion of Tula Ranch for the land application of Class B biosolids. A subsequent capital
investment of 54,545,600 for acreage in Kem County is proposed to take place contingent on
Tula Ranch obtaining compost facility permits. Through this purchase, the District will obtain a
reliable, long-term biosolids reuse site and reduce its biosolids management fees from $25.00 to
$22.40 per wet ton. The proposal also requests payment of a capacity fee of$1,250,000 to the
Yakima Company in order to reserve capacity in the proposed compost facility. This payment
would only take place upon the Yakima Company obtaining all necessary site permits. This
capacity fee will be repaid to the District in the forth of reduced biosolids management fees from
$27.40 to$25.75 per wet ton applied to 100,000 wet tons per year for ten years. Alternatively,
the capacity fee would be credited toward the compost site acquisition by the District. Upon
completion of the land acquisition and the Yakima Company compost facility the District's
annual biosolids management costs are expected be stabilized at less than $5,000,000.
Financial Implications of the Proposal
Capital Investment Proposed Operation Costs Current Operation Costs
Class B land appcat on 6 EQ Class B land application)
Tula Ranch ion s Co. $3 254 400 gj2 l) per wet ton Class B E25.00 to $28.00 r wet ton
Tula Ranch Kem Co. S4,545,600 $27.40 r wet ton for EQ $
25.00 to $26.00 per wet ton
The Yakima Company $1,250,000 1 $25.75 per wet ton for EQ N/A
Pima Gro 3 Bio Gro SO I N/A 1 $25.45 to$36.00 per wet ton
Purchase and composting of District's biosolids contingent on Tula Ranch/Magan Ranch(Tula Ranch)obtaining all
necessary permits for a compost facility. Composting cost expected to be similar to that of the Yakima Company.
2 Fee repaid to the District in the form of reduced biosolids management fees from$27.40 to$25.75 per wet ton
applied to 100,000 wet tons per year for ten years(total fee reduction of$1,650.000).
3 Pima Gro and Bio Gro land application she viability in Riverside is tenuous due to increased regulatory pressure.
The District currently contracts with three biosolids management contractors Pima Gro, Bio Gro,
and Tula Ranch to land apply biosolids in Kings, Kem, Riverside, and San Diego counties.
Existing biosolids management cost range from$25.00 to$25.90 per wet ton during fair
weather, and from $28.00 to $36.00 during inclement weather,for an annual cost of
approximately$5,000,000. These contracts curen0y provide the District with reliable and
diverse biosolids management capabilities. At the time these contracts were entered, there was
an abundance of lands permitted for biosolids land application in the region and several
biosolids management companies were competing for management of the Districts biosolids.
Things have changed. Management options are no longer abundant and costs are increasing.
This abundance of permitted land and management contractors resulted in significant biosolids
management savings to the District for the past four years, as shown in the following table.
Recent contract amendments drafted in response to the increased costs of regulatory
Blosogds Reuse Cast
S7
38A $5.8
$5.8 55.5 Pro,.
SS 0 SS 0
$5 5/.8
8 $4 54.0 54.0
0
c $3
0
$2
i
St
So
9142 92-M 93-94 9495 98-96 98-97 97.0 98-99 99.00
Fiscal Year
H My EO1a9^^4+18»id 4prytlr Rea, 1999 B-W♦q Repa,4111BPllem to ft
R. a'mse Page 2
compliance are expected to increase the annual costs of the District's biosolids management to
approximately$5,000,000 per year.
Of greater concern, biosolids management capacities under these existing contracts have been
severely limited due to several regulatory developments that have either resulted in, or threaten
to cause, a significant decrease in land permitted for Class B biosolids land application in
California. The most drastic of these regulatory developments have occurred in Kern County,
where there has been a reduction in the amount of permitted land from approximately 52,000
acres in 1995 to approximately 20,000 acres today for all southern California POTWs to utilize.
The recently adopted Kem County ordinance will also significantly increase the cost of Class B
biosolids management due to new costs associated with annual permit fees, sampling and
analysis, inspection fees, vehicle license fees, transportation, and legal and consulting costs
during the next three years. We estimate that this will increase our annual cost by$1,000,000
to over$1,500,000 if all of the District's biosolids were managed in Kem County. Land
application of Class B biosolids will be banned in Kern County on January 1, 2003.
Potential regulatory developments in other counties, including Riverside County where 75%of
the District's biosolids are currently being managed, and at the state level in Sacramento, will
result in additional regulations, decreased capacity, and increased costs to manage Class B
biosolids. These regulatory developments demand that the District take immediate action to
insure reliable long-term biosolids management options. It is clear that any long-term
sustainable biosolids management program supporting biosolids recycling must be flexible and
based on producing an Exceptional Quality(EQ) biosolids product with a reliable Class B
biosolids land application as a backup management option.
To achieve this goal of producing an EQ biosolids product in the limited time available, the
OMTS Committee, at their October meeting, authorized staff to pursue proposals received from
Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company. Specifically, the OMTS Committee directed staff to
negotiate contract terms with the Yakima Company for the management of the District's
biosolids, and to negotiate with Tule Ranch for the purchase of the entire site for long-tens
management of the District's biosolids as a means to increase the District's biosolids
management options. Securing capacity at a site that can produce an EQ biosolids compost
product and property in Kings County for the land application of Class B biosolids provides the
District with insurance that its biosolids will be managed in an environmentally safe and cost-
effective manner.
What Staff is Proposing:
Staff is proposing that contracting with the Yakima Company and purchasing Tule Ranch will:
♦ Provide the District with a secure inclement weather biosolids management site in Kem and
Kings Counties,
♦ Allow for the development of possibly two permitted compost sites to achieve the District's
Strategic Plan goal of obtaining EQ biosolids,
• Provide long-tern biosolids management capability, and
♦ Control price fluctuations.
If the Districts Board of Directors decide to pursue the agreements with Tule Ranch and the
Yakima Company, the District's biosolids management program will gain management diversity
and additional capacity. The agreements will have an immediate beneficial impact on the
District's biosolids management program during the next few months while the Tule Ranch
escrow proceeds. The District's biosolids will continue to be managed under the three existing
contracts with Pima Gro and Bio Gro in Riverside County, and Tule Ranch in Kem and Kings
Counties. A benefit may be realized during this time in that the District may be able to have
MWftye,W Ape Re XIMB MAWe RerpLL\11pNlem 18 Oa1
Page 3
exclusive use of Tula Ranch's Kings County acreage that is accessible for land application
during inclement weather, and the Yakima Company's sites in Kern County. Use of these sites
would result in the District avoiding significant additional costs associated with Pima Gro's and ,
Bio Gro's inclement weather biosolids management options that would be imposed when their
normal biosolids management sites in western Riverside become saturated.
The capacity offered in Riverside County by Pima Gro and Bio Gro will continue to be relied
upon during the time required for the development of the composting facilities. It is expected
that Riverside County will continue to allow the land application of imported Class B biosolids for
at least the next year. The continued, short-term use of land application in Riverside county
may be especially important to the District if Kenn County is successful in upholding the costly
road fees, and sampling and monitoring requirements as enforceable during the next three
years that Class B biosolids can be land applied in Kern County. Upon completion of one or
both of the compost facilities, the District would no longer need to utilize Riverside County as a
management option, but may choose to maintain the ability to land apply Class B biosolids for
additional capacity. It is expected that the Yakima Company's compost facility can be permitted
and constructed within 18 months.
After completion of one or both of the Compost facilities, all of the Districts biosolids could be
properly managed by a combination of the options available at Tula Ranch and provided by the
Yakima Company. Specifically, of the 180,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids produced annually
by the District, 50,000 wet tons would be directly land applied on the Kings County portion of
Tula Ranch, and the other 130,000 wet tons could be managed by the Yakima Company
through composting, or a combination of composting at the Yakima Company and Tula Ranch
compost facilities. Both the Yakima Company and the Tula Ranch compost facilities have
adequate available acreage for the land application of the finished compost product The
acquisition of the Tula Ranch property and the biosolids management capacity offered by the
Yakima Company provides the District several benefits including wet weather biosolids
management capacity, stabilizing price fluctuation of biosolids management, potential EQ
biosolids compost sites, and acreage to manage its biosolids.
Tula Ranch
Approval of the agreement with Tula Ranch provides the District with access to 1,808.15 acres
of Class B permitted land in Kings County, and 4,026.58 acres in Kern County for the
application of Class B biosolids through January 1, 2003 and EQ biosolids thereafter.
Since the November Steering Committee meeting, staff and Districts Counsel have commenced
the drafting of a land purchase contract and biosolids management contract that will be
presented to the Board of Directors for approval at their November 17, 1999 meeting. The
contracts deal points will include:
♦ Purchase price of the 1,808.15 acres of land, located in Kings County, at$1,800 per acre
($3,254,400),
• A three-year purchase option on the 4,026.58 acres located in Kern County, exercised upon
Tula Ranch's successful permitting of a compost facility, or upon the District's discretion
compost permits are not obtained, for$1,129 per acre ($4,545,600), and immediate
imposition by the District of reasonable restrictions on the Kern County acreage that:
♦ Limits the source of biosolids that can use the land for biosolids management,
• Limits the amount of biosolids used on the site,
• Gives priority to the management of Districts biosolids on the site, and
• Authorizes the use of excess capacity that can be used by Tula Ranch for other P01 W
biosolids management contracts.
♦ The payment of 25% gross crop revenue on Kings County site to the District.
H M'V-� Wbarn,Rep Ilm2 WAD""Re4 %11W lac
Re , % Page 4
As with all biosolids management options available today, the acquisition of Tule Ranch is not
without concerns. The Kem County biosolids ordinance will place a ban on Class B biosolids
land application in three years on the Kem County portion of Tule Ranch. During the three year
period that Class B biosolids can be land applied in Kern County, significant additional
regulatory requirements will be imposed, pending the results of the agencies legal challenge.
These regulatory requirements include a Kem County road impact fee of$3.37 per wet ton,
costs associated with field and biosolids sampling and monitoring requirements, and reduction
in capacity due to existing soil nitrogen limits. These additional regulatory requirements are
estimated to add an additional $6.00 to $8.00 per wet ton to the existing management costs for
Class B biosolids land applied in Kern County. It is possible that a portion of the road impact
fee can be avoided by accessing a majority of the Tule Ranch acreage via roads in Kings and
Tulare Counties.
The Kings County portion of Tule Ranch is subject to future regulation under the State Water
Resources Control Board's(SWRCB) General Order. This regulation is in draft form and is in
the process of undergoing an environmental impact report (EIR). As currently written, the
SWRCB's proposed General Order places daily limits on vehicle miles traveled to the site,
contains dust restrictions, and imposes cumulative heavy metal limits that may limit the site's
capacity. The SWRCB plans on certifying the EIR before October 2000. Kings County is also
in the process of drafting a reasonable ordinance that is expected to allow for the continued land
application of Class B biosolids.
Another concern is the ability to permit a biosolids compost site in Kern County. Under the
existing anti-biosolids climate Tule Ranch may experience difficulty in obtaining a conditional
use permit(CUP) in Kern County and air quality permits from the Central Valley Air Pollution
Control District Upon successful permitting, additional tasks and expenses related to compost
facility design, site development costs, capital investment, and acquisition of other composting
feedstocks remain. All of these efforts are based on the continued viability of the use of Class
EQ biosolids compost in Kern County. The Districts offer to purchase the Kem County acreage
is contingent on successful completion of the permitting process and obtaining all necessary
approvals.
The Yakima Comoanv
Staff received an unsolicited offer from the Yakima Company to manage the District's biosolids
at a proposed compost facility in western Kem County. The proposed facility will be designed to
receive, store, and compost up to 600,000 tons per year of organic feed stocks, including up to
360,000 tons per year of biosolids. The Yakima Company has commitments from the owners of
29,000 acres of farmland in the area to use the finished EQ product. Since the November
Steering Committee meeting, staff has worked with the District's Counsel and the Yakima
Company to develop an agreement to be presented to the Board at their November 17, 1999
meeting. The basic proposed deal points include:
♦ Reserving 100,000 wet tons per year capacity for compost and storage at the compost site
when complete,
• Guaranteeing a minimum of 8,333 wet tons per month (100,000 wet tons per year) of
District's Class B biosolids be managed at the site after site development,
• Obtaining the ability to use Yakima Company's land application sites for up to 100 wet tons
per day of Class B biosolids at a $25.00 per wet ton plus Kern County regulatory compliance
fees on sites permitted by the Yakima Company in Kem County during the compost site
development,
♦ Land application of District's-produced EQ product for$25.00 per wet ton by the Yakima
Company,
N.hy,CplypeMal9a'E ApwNG Pepv4110.9 BNN ApeMa Ppa'6\116R`mn 18 O%
Page 5
♦ Payment of a $1.250,000 capacity fee to the Yakima Company after all necessary compost
site permits are issued to the Yakima Company, secured by a trust deed on the 320-acre
compost site property,
• Payment of a composting fee to the Yakima Company of$25.75 per wet ton (this price
reflects a credit for the payment of the $1,250,000 capacity fee in the amount of$1.65 per
wet ton for a ten year period),
♦ Payment by the District of its share of the annual permit fees, prorated over the entire
volume of biosolids received at the compost site (e.g., annual Kem County CUP, and Waste
Board permit fees, expected to be less than$0.50 per wet ton),
• Payment of the management fees will be subject to an annual adjustment for cost
fluctuations based on a mutually acceptable formula tied to a government index, and
♦ Payment of 100% of compost revenue to the District during the Yakima Company's
ownership, and a percentage of the revenue apportioned to District's percent of ownership if
the site is sold by the Yakima Company, less transportation and other direct costs.
The Yakima Company is also offering the District the right to purchase the compost facility, after
permitting and construction. The deal points for site acquisition include:
♦ An option to purchase all or half of the developed site, pending the Los Angeles County
Sanitation District's (LACSD) interest in half of the site, at a value to be determined as
follows:
• Reimbursement for all reasonable expenditures by the Yakima Company associated
with permit acquisitions, land purchase, site design, site construction, and
• Compensation for the Yakima Company's goodwill, assignment of feedstock contracts,
assignment of contracts with farmers, land application permits, farm equipment, and
permitting and development efforts by:
• A lump sum payment upon acquisition to the Yakima Company, in an amount to be
determined, but not in excess of$1,000,000, pending LACSD's interest in the site, and
♦ Payment of a$1.50 to$2.00 per wet ton of biosolids management fee above the
actual cost of biosolids composting for a period of ten years.
• Any unused portion of the $1,250,000 capacity fee would be applied toward the purchase.
Purchase of the site is proposed to commence after permitting, design, and construction, but
does not preclude exercising the option to purchase immediately after the permitting is
complete. Site design and construction by the Yakima Company is expected to cost 25%to
30% less than that contracted for by an agency, and take significantly less time to complete.
District's staff and consultants will actively provide input as to the appropriate design of the
facility in order to protect our long-term interest in the site's integrity.
If the District does not exercise the purchase option, the Yakima Company will offer the first
right of refusal to the District to purchase the site within 90 days of notice of a bona fide
purchase offer. The District would retain the ability to exercise the purchase option detailed
above the Yakima Company offers the first right of refusal. If the site is not acquired by the
District before the end of the ten-year contract,the Yakima Company would provide two
additional five-year biosolids management option periods.
Permitting is expected to take six to eight months at a cost estimated to be between $50,000
and $150,000, depending on the level of opposition to the project. Kem County Planning
Department plans on using a Negative Declaration for California Environmental Quality Act
compliance on this project The District believes that in order to make this project successful,
both the District and LACSD need to participate in the proposal. The contract has been drafted
in order to create the best possible and least complicated avenue towards this goal.
HWy traW�.eMa&uN�ywGa Rgma116�BoaN•perdu NepaLLNt WM,n 18.Co1
. a Page 6
` Concerns similar to those that may affect Tule Ranch apply to the Yakima Company's offer,
specifically, the impacts of the Kem County biosolids and the ability to permit a biosolids
compost site. The Yakima Company does not have a route to their land application site that
would avoid the use of Kern County roads. If upheld by the courts, Class B biosolids land
applied by Yakima during the next three years would be subject to the proposed $3.37 per wet
ton road impact fee.
Unfortunately, the success of permitting and constructing a Class A compost facility in Kern or
Kings Counties is yet to be determined. District's consultants in Kern County believe that both
sites will be able to obtain all of the required permits. Each site must apply to the county for a
Conditional Use Permit, the State for a solid waste facility permit, and the air pollution control
district for air quality permits, and be subject to the required public hearing and comment
process. Biosolids compost is not exempt from regulation. The federal biosolids regulation, 40
CFR Part 503, regulates biosolids composting. California's Waste Board regulates the compost
facility, and the California Department of Food and Agriculture is proposing to regulate the
compost product Local government agencies are becoming active in regulating biosolids
compost. Imperial County recently drafted a proposed biosolids ordinance that would ban the
use of EQ biosolids, including biosolids compost.
Alternatives and Concerns:
Should the District continue to wait on making a long-term commitment like this? With the rapid
deterioration of biosolids management capacity available, staff believes that the District must act
immediately in order to obtain reliable biosolids management options.
What about pursuing new biosolids management technologies? The long-term biosolids
management decision to acquire Tulle Ranch/Magan Ranch and contract with the Yakima
Company may preclude the District's ability to take advantage of current and developing
technologies for many years. Many of these technologies, including heal drying, conversion to
fuel, etc., have been around for decades but in the past have not been implemented
successfully.
What's our greatest concern regarding these proposals? The beneficial reuse of Class B
biosolids, and even EQ biosolids, is not guaranteed to be a viable option. No biosolids reuse
option is guaranteed. Class B biosolids land application in Kings County appears to be secure
under the SWRCB's proposed General Order. During the ordinance development process, the
Kem County Board of Supervisors encouraged agencies to convert Class B biosolids to EQ
biosolids for future use in Kem County. The viability of both of these options can change altered
upon the modification of the applicable regulation.
In light of these concerns, staff recommends approving the agreements with Tule Ranch and
the Yakima Company. Staff also recommends maintaining existing contracts with Bio Gro and
Pima Gro that utilize biosolids land application sites in Riverside and San Diego Counties during
the site acquisition, permitting, and development process.
'Class B biosolids are biosolids that have been processed to achieve a significant pathogen reduction(e.g., using
anaerobic digestion as performed at the District)and meets vector attraction reduction requirements.
Gass A biosolids are biosolids that have been further processed(e.g.,composting)in order to meet the most
stringent pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements.
EQ biosolids are Class A biosolids that meet the most stringent limits for pollutant concentrations.
Pathogens are disease-causing organisms, such as certain bactena,viruses, and parasdes(e.g., salmonella,fecal
coliform). Vectors are organisms,such as rodents and insects that can spread disease by carrying and transferring
pathogens.
HMy.JpUpMW\9w!IywWa ago4\16W ByN��pM�eIpW11B to.
R. a Page 7
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
H.My.CUYpeMABmE ApeMo Repx lMD-W•peeEa Rg kllB 18.M
Revee: vmw Page 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS rxebog Dm Tn Bd Mqr.
11j7 99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number IWMNumber
19
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
SUBJECT: Employer-Employee Relations Resolution
GENERAL MANAGERS RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-24, Adopting a New Employer-Employee Relations
Resolution, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34.
SUMMARY
It has been nearly 25 years since the District updated the rules and regulations
regarding the unions and negotiations. Changes in the law since 1975 make it
desirable and appropriate to update the old employment relations rules.
The primary feature of the new Resolution is that it allows only one employee
organization per bargaining unit, thus eliminating the possibility of having multiple
organizations representing employees in the same classifications and units. Section 6
of the old Resolution 75-127 allows recognition of an employee organization by any
"reasonable method". After the District adopted that Resolution, the Supreme Court
held that a public agency could restrict a bargaining unit to representation by only one
employee organization. However, in order to do so, the Court stated that the public
agency must (1) adopt an employee relations ordinance providing for exclusive
representation, and (2) hold an election among the employees. (Covina Azusa
Firefighters v. City of Azuza)
The other significant change is in the decertification procedure. Currently, a union must
receive a majority of those who vote in an election to gain exclusive recognition.
However, to decertify the same union, it would take a majority of all employees in the
group regardless of whether they voted in the election. The new resolution will change
the decertification procedure to be consistent with the recognition procedure to provide
a level playing field for all employee organizations.
The new Resolution also allows the Director of Human Resources to modify bargaining
units based on his or her own initiative, rather than only upon request of an employee
organization. Finally, it contains a "grandfather clause" so as not to disturb the rights of
existing employee organizations.
The FAHR Committee approved the Resolution in concept and directed the Human
Resources Director to "meet and consult" with the unions. The meet and consult
requirement has been completed and the resolution is now ready to be adopted.
wmmuny habemeaBwN ba+aa Rmoeieee twob•ee.aa Re�auiean. e ad
R �„ Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
BUDGETIMPACT ,
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. OCSD 99-24
H hq.EC`apsrgal&aN Al.n.R.RWIMB N Ap.ft Repb1110d11em 19 Ed
R. Page 2
w
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99
ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.
OCSD 9834
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.
OCSD 9834.
WHEREAS, Joint Resolution No. 75-127 established rules and regulations for
Employer-Employee Relations of the former County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County; and,
WHEREAS, upon consolidation of the Districts into the Orange County Sanitation
District, former Joint Resolution No. 75-127 was re-enacted without change as
Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; and
WHEREAS, changes in the laws and District practices since 1975 make it
desirable and appropriate to update the District's employment relations rules and
regulations; and
WHEREAS, State law (the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act) permits local agencies to
adopt reasonable rules and regulations for the orderly administration of labor relations
after meeting and consulting with appropriate labor organizations,
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That this Resolution upon adoption approves the rules and regulations set forth
herein for employer-employee relations and repeals Resolution No. OCSD 98-34
10W89 02 1
w
RULES AND REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
This Resolution implements Chapter 10, division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of
the State of California (Sections 3500 et seq.) captioned "Local Public Employee
Organizations", by providing orderly procedures for the administration of employer-
employee relations between the District and its employee organizations. Nothing
contained herein shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of the State law.
It is the purpose of this Resolution to provide procedures for meeting and conferring in
good faith with recognized employee organizations regarding the wages, hours and
other terms and conditions of employment of employees in appropriate units and that
are not preempted by Federal or State law. This policy is supplemented by provisions
recognizing and defining the rights of employees to join organizations of their own
choosing for the purpose of representation on matters affecting employee relations or to
represent themselves individually in dealing with the District.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
As used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
a. "Appropriate representation unit" means a group of employee classes or
positions, established in accordance with the criteria set forth in Article II, Section
6.
b. "Confidential employees" are those employees who, with authorized access,
assist and act in a confidential capacity to and for persons who formulate,
determine, and effectuate management policies with respect to labor relations.
C. "Consult'means to communicate verbally or in writing for the purpose of
presenting and obtaining views and advising of intended action.
d. "Contract employee"means an individual who works for the District pursuant to a
written contract as set forth in Policy A10.00 in the "Human Resources
Department Policies and Procedures" manual.
e. "Day"means calendar day unless expressly stated otherwise.
f. "District' means the Orange County Sanitation District.
105689 v2 2
w
g. "District representative" means any individual designated to represent the District
with regard to employer-employee relations.
h. "Regular employee" means any person employed by the District except elected
officials and temporary and contract employees.
i. "Employee organization" means any organization which includes employees of
the District and which has as one of its primary purposes representing such
employees in their employment relations with the District.
j. "Employee Relations Officer" means the Director of Human Resources or the
Director's designee.
k. "Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization" means the employee
organization which has been formally acknowledged by the District as the
exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate representation unit,
pursuant to a majority vote of the employees in such a unit. There shall be no
recognition of employee organizations other than exclusive recognition.
I. "Impasse" means the existence of unresolved differences after good faith
negotiations over an issue regarding wages, hours or other terms and conditions
of employment.
M. "Management Employee" means an employee having responsibility for
formulating, administering or managing the implementation of District policies
and programs.
n. "Mediation" means the efforts of an impartial third person, or persons, functioning
as intermediaries, to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary resolution of an
impasse.
0. "Meet and confer in good faith", or"meet and confer", means that the
representatives of Exclusively Recognized Employee Organizations and the
District shall have the mutual obligation personally to meet and confer promptly
upon request by either party and continue for a reasonable period of time in order
to exchange freely, information, opinions, and proposals, and to endeavor to
reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation, including the
mutual obligation to execute a written document incorporating any agreement
reached.
P. "Proof of Employee Support" means (1) an authorization card recently signed
and dated by an employee, or(2)a verified authorization petition or petitions
recently signed and dated by an employee, or(3) employee dues deduction
authorization, using the payroll register for the period immediately prior to the
date a petition is filed except that dues deduction authorizations for more than
one employee organization for the account of any one employee shall not be
105ea9�2 3
a
considered as proof of employee support. The only authorization which shall be
considered as proof of employee support shall be the authorization last signed by
an employee. The words "recently signed"shall mean within sixty (60) days prior
to the filing of a petition.
q. 'Professional Employees"means employees engaged in work requiring
specialized knowledge and skills attained through completion of a recognized
course of instruction, including but not limited to, attorneys, physicians, registered
nurses, engineers, architects, teachers, and the various types of physical,
chemical, and biological scientists.
r. "Resolution"means, unless otherwise specified herein, this "Employer-Employee
Relations Resolution" and any amendments thereto.
S. "Scope of Representation"means all matters relating to employment conditions
and employer-employee relations, concerning which the District is obligated by
law to meet and confer, including, but not limited to, wages, hours, and other
terms and conditions of employment; except that the parties may, by mutual
agreement, negotiate on matters of employment concerning issues upon which
negotiation is neither required nor prohibited by the law or this Resolution.
t. "Supervisory employee"means any employee having authority, in the interest of
the District, to hire, transfer, suspend, layoff, recall, promote, discharge, assign,
reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibility to direct them, or to adjust
their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action if, in connection with
the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical
nature, but required the use of independent judgment.
SECTION 3. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
a. Employees of the District shall have the right to form,join and participate in the
activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of
representation on matters within the scope of representation.
b. Employees of the District shall also have the right to refuse to join or participate
in the activities of employee organizations and shall have the right to represent
themselves individually in their employment relations with the district to the extent
permitted bylaw.
C. No employee shall be interfered with, dominated, intimidated, restrained, coerced
or discriminated against by the District because of the exercise of the rights
contained in this Resolution.
d. No employee shall be interfered with, intimidated, restrained, coerced or
discriminated against by any employee organization because of the exercise of
the rights contained in this Resolution.
IDseaevz 4
SECTION 4. MANAGMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
a. In order to insure that the District is able to carry out functions and
responsibilities imposed by law, the District has and will retain the exclusive right
to manage and direct the performance of District services, which includes,
among others, the exclusive right to:
• Determine issues of public policy; determine the mission of its
constituent departments, commissions and boards; set levels and
standards of service;
• Determine the procedures and standards of selection for
employment; direct its employees;
• Relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work, for cause
or for other lawful reasons;
• Maintain the efficiency of District operations;
• Contract out work;
• Determine the methods, means and personnel by which District
operations are to be conducted; and, exercise control and
discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its
work.
b. The District retains its right to amend, modify, or rescind any policies, practices or
agreements which impact upon wages, hours or working conditions of employees
in cases of emergency. Emergencies shall be defined as acts of God, natural
disasters, legislative acts,judicial action or other acts which are beyond the
control of the District, and which would authorize District action without meeting
and conferring under State law. If under this section the District amends,
modifies or rescinds any policy, practice or agreement, such amendment,
modification or rescission will continue only for the duration of the emergency.
ARTICLE II. EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION PROCEEDINGS
SECTION 1. FILING OF RECOGNITION PETITION BY EMPLOYEE
ORGANIZATION
An employee organization that seeks to be formally acknowledged as the Exclusively
Recognized Employee Organization representing the employees in an appropriate
representation unit shall file a statement with the Employee Relations Officer containing
the following information and documentation:
105M v2 5
a. Name and address of the employee organization.
b. Names and titles of its officers.
C. Names of employee organization representatives who are authorized to act on
behalf of the organization.
d. A statement that the employee organization has, as one of its primary purposes,
representing employees in their employment relations with the District.
e. A statement whether the employee organization is a chapter of, or affiliated
directly or indirectly in any manner, with a local, regional, state, national or
international organization, and, if so, the name and address of each such other
organization.
f. Certified copies of the employee organization's Constitution and By-Laws.
g. A designation of those persons, not exceeding two in number, and their
addresses, to whom notice sent by regular United States mail will be deemed
sufficient notice to the employee organization for any purpose.
h. The job classifications or titles of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate.
i. A statement that the employee organization has in its possession proof of
employee support to establish that thirty percent (30%) of the employees in the
unit claimed to be appropriate have designated the employee organization to
represent them in their employment relations with the District.
j. A request that the District formally acknowledge the petitioner as the Exclusively
Recognized Employee Organization representing the employees in the unit
claimed to be appropriate for the purposes of meeting and conferring in good
faith.
k. The petition, including the proof of employee support and all accompanying
documentation, shall be declared to be true, correct and complete, under penalty
of perjury, by the duly authorized officer(s)of the employee organization
executing it.
I. The District or its Employee Relations Officer may request verification of the
sufficiency of the signatures submitted in support of a petition. Such request for
verification shall be made within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the
petition.
105689 Q 6
SECTION 2. RESPONSE TO RECOGNITION PETITION
Upon receipt of the Petition, the Employee Relations Officer shall determine whether:
a. There has been compliance with the requirements of a Recognition Petition; and,
b. The proposed representation unit is an appropriate unit in accordance with
Section 6 of Article 11.
If an affirmative determination is made by the Employee Relations Officer on the
foregoing two matters, he or she shall post a notice of election setting an election date
not less than forty-five (45) days and not more than sixty (60)days after such
determination.
If either of the foregoing matters are not affirmatively determined, the Employee
Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the petitioning employee organization.
The petitioning employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition or
appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer pursuant to Article 11,
Section 8 of this Resolution.
SECTION 3. OPEN PERIOD FOR FILING CHALLENGING PETITION
Within thirty (30) days of the date the notice of election is posted, any other employee
organization may file a request to be the Exclusively Recognized Employee
Organization of employees in the same unit by filing a petition which conforms to
Section 1 of Article II.
SECTION4. ELECTION PROCEDURE
a. The Employee Relations Officer shall arrange for a secret ballot election to be
conducted by the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service or by a
mutually selected third party subject to the provisions of this Resolution. In the
event the State Mediation and Conciliation Service, or other mutually selected
third party, if any, declines or is unable to conduct the election in a timely fashion,
the election shall be conducted by the Secretary to the Board of Directors in
accordance with the election procedures specified in this Resolution. All
employee organizations who have duly submitted petitions which have been
determined to be in conformance with Section 1 of Article II shall be included in
the ballot. The ballot shall also reserve to employees the choice of no
representative. Regular and temporary employees employed in positions within
the designated appropriate unit who were so employed during the pay period
which ended at least fifteen (15)days before the date the election commences,
shall be entitled to vote in a representation election. Regular and temporary
employees who did not work during such period because of illness, vacation or
other authorized leaves of absence, and who are employed by the District in the
same unit on the date of the election shall also be eligible to vote in a
105W9 vz 7
representation election. An employee organization shall be formally
acknowledged as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the
designated appropriate unit following an election or run-off election if it received a
majority of all valid votes cast in the election. In an election involving three or
more choices, where none of the choices receives a majority of the valid votes
cast, a run-off election shall be conducted between the two choices receiving the
largest number of valid votes cast. The rules governing an initial election shall be
applicable to a run-off election.
b. Within 30 days prior to an election, the District's Employee Relations Officer will
present to the agency conducting the election, and the applicable employee
organization(s), a list of eligible voters in the appropriate unit for which the
employee organization(s) has made a satisfactory showing of interest. The
eligibility list will be kept current by the District during the month before the
election and a revised eligibility list will be presented to the applicable employee
organization(s)and the agency conducting the election on the day(s) of the
election. Either the District or the employee organization or organizations
participating in the election may challenge any name on the list of eligible voters,
Including the revised list, at any time, up to and including the day(s) of the
election. No challenges to the eligibility list may be made after the election has
concluded. The agency conducting the election shall determine who is an
eligible employee and its decision shall be final and binding.
C. Election ballots shall offer eligible employees a choice between representation by
the employee organization or organizations involved, on the one hand, and no
organization, on the other. The ballot question shall read as follows: "Do you
want [insert name of employee organization] to act as your exclusive
representative: Yes_ No " The question will be repeated where
more than one employee organization will be on the ballot. The question will be
followed by the question, "Do you want no organization? Yes_ No .11
d. There shall be no more than one representation election under this Resolution for
each designated appropriate unit, excluding run-off elections, in a 12-month
period.
e. Costs of conducting elections under this Section shall be bome in equal shares
by District and by each of the employee organizations appearing on the ballot.
f. The election will be held on the District's premises at a time and on the date
selected by the Employee Relations Officer for the election, or by mail ballots, in
the discretion of the Employee Relations Officer. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Employee Relations Officer and petitioning employee organization may agree
to a different election date so long as it is consistent with the employees' rights to
choose their representative and there is a reasonable basis for such stipulation.
105689 v2 8
g. The agency conducting the election shall also be responsible for maintaining the
voting site, the ballot box and tallying the votes at the conclusion of the election
day(s). The conducting agency shall certify the results of the election to both
parties as soon as it has counted the ballots.
h. If it is determined that an Employee Organization has received affirmative votes
from a majority of the eligible employees casting ballots in an appropriate unit,
the Employee Relations Officer shall so report to the District's Board of Directors
at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Upon receiving such a report, the Board
of Directors shall certify the employee organization as the Exclusive
Representative for the unit in which the election was held. Once such
certification is given, it may only be withdrawn If the Exclusive Representative
subsequently loses a decertification election or if the District has a good faith
belief that the Exclusive Representative no longer enjoys majority support from
eligible employees in the unit in question.
SECTION 5. PROCEDURE FOR DECERTIFICATION OF EXCLUSIVELY
RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
a. A decertification petition alleging that the incumbent Exclusively Recognized
Employee Organization no longer represents a majority of the employees in an
established unit may be filed with the Employee Relations Officer. A
decertification petition may not be filed within one (1) year after a valid election in
which the challenged Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization appeared
on the ballot, whether for decertification or certification. A decertification petition
may not be filed during the term of a valid Memorandum of Understanding except
during the open period preceding the expiration of a Memorandum of
Understanding. The open period shall be the thirty(30)day period commencing
one hundred fifty (150) days and ending one hundred twenty(120) days prior to
the expiration of a Memorandum of Understanding. A decertification petition may
be filed after a valid Memorandum of Understanding has expired. A valid
Memorandum of Understanding shall not serve as a bar to the filing of a
decertification petition for more than a three-year period. A decertification
petition may be filed by an employee or an employee organization(s), shall be
accompanied by proof of employee support, and shall conform to the extent
possible to the requirements for a petition for recognition under Section 1 of
Article II.
b. The Employee Relations Officer shall Initially determine whether the
decertification petition has been filed in accordance with the applicable provisions
of this Resolution. If, in the judgment of the Employee Relations Officer, the
decertification petition does not meet the requirements set forth in this
Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the
petitioning employee(s) or employee organization. The petitioning employee(s)
or employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition for
decertification or may appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer
105689 v2 9
a
pursuant to Article II, Section B of this Resolution. If the decertification petition
satisfies the requirements of this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer
shall so advise the petitioning employee(s) or employee organization and shall
give written notice of the petition to the challenged Exclusively Recognized
Employee Organization.
C. If a decertification petition satisfying the requirements of this Resolution is filed,
the Employee Relations Officer shall post notice of election to occur on or about
thirty(30) days after notice of the decertification petition is given pursuant to
subparagraph (b) hereof, to determine the wishes of unit employees as to
representation. A decertification election shall be conducted by secret ballot.
The ballot shall offer employees eligible to vole the choice of no representation.
Only those regular employees eligible to vote for the certification of an employee
organization shall be eligible to vote in a decertification election. If the
challenged incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization does not
receive affirmative votes from a majority of the eligible employees voting, that
employee organization shall be decertified, and the unit shall not be represented
by an employee organization until such time as a new exclusive employee
organization is recognized pursuant to this Resolution.
d. A petition for decertification of an incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee
Organization may be combined with a petition for certification of a new
Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization. A decertification election held
pursuant to this Section may be combined with an election for certification of a
new Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization held pursuant to Article II
Section 4. However, no new exclusive employee organization may be
recognized to represent an appropriately designated employee unit unless, by
majority vote, the regular employees who vote in said unit, vote to decertify the
incumbent Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization. If, pursuant to this
Section, a different employee organization is formally certified as the Exclusively
Recognized Employee Organization, such organization shall be bound by the
terms and conditions of any Memorandum of Understanding then in effect for its
remaining term.
SECTION 6. POLICY AND STANDARDS FOR DETERMINATION OF
APPROPRIATE UNITS
a. The policy objectives in determining the appropriateness of a unit shall be the
effect of a proposed unit on (1)the efficient operations of the District and its
compatibility with the primary responsibility of the District and its employees to
effectively and economically serve the public, and (2)providing employees with
effective representation based on recognized community of interest
considerations. These policy objectives require that the appropriate unit shall be
the broadest feasible grouping of positions that share an identifiable community
of interest. Factors to be considered shall be:
105659 Q 10
4
ARTICLE III. ADMINISTRATION
SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF CURRENT INFORMATION BY RECOGNIZED
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS
a. All changes in the information filed with the District by an Exclusively Recognized
Employee Organization under items (a) through (g) of the recognition petition
under Section 1 of Article II shall be submitted in writing to the Employee
Relations Officer within fourteen (14) days of such change.
b. The District shall allow a reasonable number of employee representatives of an
Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization reasonable time off without loss
of compensation or other benefits when formally meeting and conferring with
representatives of the District on matters within the scope of representation.
SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PROCEDURES
If the meet and confer process has reached impasse as defined in this Resolution,
either party may initiate the impasse procedures by filing with the other party a written
request for an impasse meeting. The impasse request shall contain a statement of the
parties' position on all issues. An impasse meeting shall be scheduled promptly by the
Employee Relations Officer. The purpose of such meeting shall be:
a. To review the position of the parties in a final effort to reach agreement on a
Memorandum of Understanding; and,
b. If the impasse is not resolved, to discuss arrangements for the utilization of the
impasse procedures provided herein.
SECTION 3. IMPASSE PROCEDURES
Impasse procedures are as follows:
a. If the parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation the dispute shall be
submitted to mediation. The mediation proceedings shall be private. The
mediator shall make no public recommendations, nor take any public position at
any time concerning the issues. If the parties agree upon mediation, all costs of
mediation shall be bome in equal shares by District and by each Exclusively
Recognized Employee Organization participating in the mediation.
b. If the parties do not agree on mediation or the selection of a mediator, or having
so agreed, the impasse has not been resolved, and unless prohibited by law, all
issues shall be submitted to the District's Board of Directors for its determination
and such action as it, in its discretion, deems to be appropriate in the public
interest. The action by the District's Board of Directors shall be final and
conclusive.
105689 vz 13
4
ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION
This Resolution shall be administered and construed as follows:
a. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to deny to any person, employee,
organization, the District or any officer or other representative of the District, the
rights, powers and authority granted by Federal or State law.
b. This Resolution shall be interpreted so as to carry out its purposes as set forth in
Article I.
SECTION 2. REPEAL OF PRIOR RESOLUTIONS
The provisions of this Resolution shall supersede and take precedence over the
provisions of any prior Resolutions, minute orders or statements of policy, adopted by
the District's Board of Directors, dealing with the same subjects and matters as are
covered herein, including, but not limited to Resolution No. OCSD 98-34.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Resolution, or the application of such provision to any persons or
circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Resolution, or the application
of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held
invalid, shall not be affected.
SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION
The Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby directed to certify to the passage of
this Resolution and thereupon and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. GRANDFATHER CLAUSE
District recognizes that the following employee organizations have been elected
pursuant to majority vote of the employees in and for the following units:
l05M Q 14
e
Orange County Employees Association - Administrative and Clerical Unit
- Technical Services Unit
- Engineering Unit
International Union of Operating - Operations, Maintenance and General
Engineers, Local 501 Services Unit
Supervisory and Professional - Supervisory Management Unit
Management Group - Professional Unit
District grants Exclusive Recognition to such employee organizations for said units until
such status is changed pursuant to this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this day of , 19
Chairman, Board of Directors
Secretary, Board of Directors
105689 v2 15
COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL
FINANCIAL
REPORT
for the Fiscal Year
ended June 30th , 1999
Orange CountySanitationDistrict, 1
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
r
r
r
Prepared By:
Department of Finance
r Accounting Division
Michael 0, White, CPA
r Controller
r
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
(THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
u
U
u
u
U
u
U
u
u
u
u
r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Table of Contents
r
For the Year Ended June 30, 1999
paw
INTRODUCTORY SECTION:
Letterof Transmittal..................................................................................................................... t
GFOACertificate of Achievement................................................................................................ bl
Boardof Directors........................................................................................................................ x
OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... A
Mapof Service Area..................................................................................................................... xi
FINANCIAL SECTION:
Independent Auditors'Report....................................................................................................... 7
Combined Financial Statements(General Purpose Financial Statements):
Combined Balance Sheets.................................................................................................. 4-5
Combined Statements of Revenues. Expenses, and Changes in
RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... 6
Combined Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................. 7
r Notes to Financial Statements............................................................................................. 8-25
Required Supplementary Information—Impact of Year 2000(Unaudited).................................. 26
Combining Financial Statements:
Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 28-29
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses,and Changes in
RetainedEarnings............................................................................................................ 30-31
Combining Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 32
r
STATISTICAL SECTION(Unaudited):
Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years.......................................................1......................... 33
,.i Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................... 34
Properly Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years.............................. 35
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property-
rLast Ten Fiscal Years .............................................................................................................. 36
Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments-
LastTen Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 37
PrincipalUsers............................................................................................................................. 38
Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses—Last Ten Fiscal Years....... 39
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 40
Bond Coverage-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 41
r Demographic Statistics- Last Ten Fiscal Years.......................................................................... 42
Property Values and Construction-Last Ten Fiscal Years......................................................... 43
Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served
by the Orange County Sanitation District................................................................................. 44
rInsurance in Force....................................................................................................................... 45
Comparison of Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses-Last Ten Fiscal Years............ 46
Biosolids Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................ 47
r Miscellaneous Statistics............................................................................................................... 48
r
w
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
(THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
'u
IuI
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
OCSD
Introductory Section
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
��
-�
0
a
s
R
O
t
-t
N
i'
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
September 10, 1999
e�
"7141962-2411
..mng.dde..: The Board of Directors of the
P.0. Box m27 Orange County Sanitation District,
nancaln valley,M Orange County, California
92728-8127
alaort address: Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the Orange County Sanitation
344 nl1$QV,CA District, Orange County. Californiafor the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. This report includes the
Fduntain vaster. ue 9 tY• Y P
92708-7018 financial position and activity of the nine individual Revenue Areas, as described within the Governmental
Structure below, as of June 30, 1999 and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the District's
Finance Department.
Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation,
Age„eniies including all disclosures, rests with the District. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed
a data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial
Vein. position and results of operations of the District All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an
understanding of the District's financial activities have been included.
Anaheim
Bred Buena Park The report presented herewith consists of three parts: (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of
LNIEaa transmittal, a Governmental Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement, a listing of the Board
Iwntem Valle, of Directors, an organization chart, and a map of the individual revenue areas; (2) a financial section
Fullerton consisting of the independent auditors' report, general purpose financial statements, and combining
canted B
H•,dtingtan Beath statements of the individual Revenue Area Funds; and (3) a statistical section consisting of pertinent
Irvine financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information about the District.
Le Habra
La Palma
Loa Manilas Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and
VewPart Beath functions controlled by the District's Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting
o-a^se Standards Board Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity". For the u
Platedua W g ty". purpose of this
Santa Ana evaluation, control was determined by the Board's responsibility for: (1) adoption of the budget and user
Seal Beach charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are
started
Teen. described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements.
Vida Park
ywba bne.
t ate of orange GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE
9.4¢ery District. The Orange County Sanitation District encompasses the Northern section of Orange County. The District
provides wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering 471 square miles and serving a
caste Mesa population of 2,386,000, or approximately 86 percent of the County's population. The District was
NbCway Cary originally incorporated in 1954 as nine separate public corporations, or districts. In April of 1998, the
W.t.r District. Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of
h-nn.Ponca; these nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange
County Sanitation District, effective July 1, 1998. This action was recommended to the Board by the
Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the
Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and
auditing processes. The boundaries of the nine previous districts will remain intact for the purpose of
-To Protect the Pubhc Health and ma Enmmnma^t through Fmeflence in Wastewater Systems-
collecting sewer user fees, at the previously established rate schedules, and will be referred to as
Revenue Areas.
The District is managed by an administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the
agencies or cifies which are serviced by the District. Each of the nine Revenue Areas has its own budget
and is responsible for the construction and maintenance of its own collection system. All Revenue Areas,
except Revenue Areas 13 and 14, receive their own share of the one-percent ad valorem property tax
levy. In addition, all Revenue Areas except Revenue Area 14, collect user fees from property owners.
Revenue Area 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District.
The purpose of the District's wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve
the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the
treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in
accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency.
The District sewerage system includes approximately 650 miles of sewers that convey wastewater
generated within the District's boundaries to the District's two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation
Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of
Huntington Beach.
Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd).
Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50 percent of
the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a
future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. u
Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined and discharged to the ocean off the I '
Huntington Beach coast through an ouffall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five U
miles long. The last mile of the ouffall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a
ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet.
u
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
Orange County represents one of the major economic centers in the state and nation. If Orange County u
was a nation, its economy would rank 3r among all countries in the world. The Anderson Center for
Economic Research at Chapman University estimates its Gross County Product at$104.9 billion for 1999,
up five percent from the prior year.
In 1998, jobs in Orange County increased by five percent, or approximately 61,000 jobs, almost double
that of the overall U.S. growth of 2.6 percent. The relatively rapid pace of Orange County's job growth is I
reflected by the fact that 1998 marked the third consecutive year that it outpaced job growth nation-wide. u
Orange County job growth is also increasing significantly faster than all other counties in California, and
by more than 50 percent over Santa Clara County — home to most of Silicon Valley. Most of the job ' 1
growth in Orange County is attributable to high-tech and other durable manufacturing employment, u
Including engineering and software development, telecommunications, medical Instruments industry, and
information technology. The Irvine Spectrum alone is home to more than 2,000 companies employing
almost 45,000 workers In fields ranging from biotechnology to clothing design.
The real gross domestic product in Orange County for 1999 is projected to replicate the prior year's 3.9
percent growth before steadily dropping to 2.6 percent In 2000. Growth in total building permit valuation in i
the county is forecasted to hit 20 percent this year before dropping back to a still strong growth rate of 10
percent in 2000. These projections by Chapman University call for a $4.1 billion of total building permit
valuation in 1999 and $4.5 billion In 2000, exceeding the previous high of$4.2 billion reached In 1988.
11
r
r
Because of a tight housing supply and high demand generated by strong job growth, upward pressure on
housing prices will continue at double digit rates in 1999 before dropping back to 7.6 percent appreciation
in 2000. Recent statistics from the Real Estate Research Council suggest that housing prices in Orange
County, unlike other Southern California counties, have finally recovered all the losses incurred during the
first half of the 1990's.
r The District implemented a five-year rate schedule in May 1997 that provides for gradual increases for
four of the nine Revenue Areas through 2001-02. The two Revenue Areas in need of the largest
adjustments voted to extend their increases over a ten-year period beginning in 1997-98, a move
r designed to ease the immediate impact of those increases on their residents. Pending completion of the
new strategic plan, it is anticipated that three Revenue Areas will require no change in their sewer service
user fees through 2000-01. Prior to this increase, the District had been operating without an increase in
sewer service fees over the last five years by deferring the construction of new facilities and by
reorganizing and streamlining operations which resulted in the reduction of actual staffing levels by 93
positions, or 14.9 percent of the workforce, primarily through attrition. However, rate increases became
inevitable as the District's capital improvement and rehabilitation requirements and Certificate of
Participation debt obligations grew beyond the District's ability to pay solely from property tax proceeds.
In 1998, the District conducted an in-depth review of it's reserve policies. This review included a survey of
the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying
economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 1999, the District's
designated retained earnings totaled $376 million, and have been earmarked for the following specific
purposes in accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy:
r
Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 74 million
Designated For Self-Insurance 57 million
,r Designated For Capital Improvements 195 million
Designated For Debt Service Requirements 33 million
Designated For Rate Stabilization 17 million
Total Designated Retained Earnings $376 million
r MAJOR INITIATIVES
Strategic Plan
r The District is currently undergoing a major strategic planning effort that will define goals, operational
commitments and associated financial requirements for the next ten years. The strategic plan revises
many of the assumptions used to develop the District's existing planning document, including the
population and land use projections, the level of building activity within the service area and the volume of
wastewater treated.
The plan, which is expected to be completed in the Fall of 1999, will also provide an operations and
r financial plan, including a review of the Districts collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and a study
of the ocean outfall system.
r
Reinvention
Based on an Operations and Maintenance(O&M)efficiency assessment conducted in the Spring of 1995,
it was determined that an additional 16 percent reduction in personnel and technology costs would have
r' to be achieved in order to become 'best in class'. Shortly following this assessment, a Districts
Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed to involve employees in the implementation of
iii
I
new work practices that would provide for the reduction in operating costs and increase the agency's
efficiency to match that of the most efficient wastewater treatment agency.
During fiscal year 1997-98, DART completed the DART Reinvention Report that contained the reinvention 1..1
and implementation plan components. The report includes DART's mission and goals and provides
recommendations for changes in the following three areas.
L�
• Business practices, which are the philosophical tenets of the organization. The business practices
describe"why"an organization performs functions in a specific manner.
• Work practices, which are the policies and procedures (the -what" and 'how') developed by the L,
organization to implement the business practices.
• Reinvention tools,which are the support systems needed by the organization and employees to apply
the business practices and work practices to their activities.
V
The following tasks were the focus of DARTs effort during fiscal year 1998-99:
Information Systems Integration -The DART Implementation Plan identifies the need to link the financial L
information system and plant automation system to the Computerized Maintenance Management System
(CMMS). To meet the identified need, a new planning and scheduling module for the CMMS has been
purchased and is currently being tested. The module will be in production in 1999-00.
Reinvention Training - Four reinvention training goals were established for fiscal year 1998-99. The
DART Reinvention Concept workshops for O&M personnel were conducted in November and December I
of 1998. Area Team training scope and consultant hiring was completed in the third quarter of 1998-99. Lj
Technical training requirements to broaden the skills of O&M personnel have been identified and were
implemented in the fourth quarter of 1998-99.- The Planning and Scheduling training will be delayed until )
fiscal year 1999-00 to coincide with the implementation of the CMMS Planning &Scheduling Module.
Area & Utility Team Implementation -The Area & Utility Teams are preparing to support the Reinvention
Automation Project(J-42). The teams will be making improvement recommendations and reviewing plant
documentation to support the automation project workshops. The teams' automation project input will
focus on optimizing the plant processes through improved control systems.
Asset Management Program - This program will develop a means to track equipment costs and use the u
cost data to make improved maintenance decisions. It is the foundation upon which the Planning and
Scheduling Program will be built Project Specialists are developing the managed maintenance criteria
(such as cost centers, process crificality and lifecycle evaluation)and entering data into the CMMS.
Warehouse & Purchasing - The Warehousing & Purchasing and O&M Divisions formed a user's group in
1998-99 to address issues associated with implementing new business practices. The user's group has I I
been tasked with developing an O&M and Warehousing & Purchasing business and work practices 1.1
improvement plan. Completed in the third quarter of 1998-99, the plan identifies project objectives and
the tasks that must be completed to align the new O&M business and work practices and the purchasing
and warehousing process.
Process Performance Measurement and Reporting - The changes in the maintenance program that are
currently under way and the development of new information tools, such as the asset management data L
warehouse, will result in an expanded performance reporting capability.
The reinvention process will begin to return benefits in the fourth year and continue through year five of I
the reinvention implementation process. Total direct and indirect implementation costs to be incurred
during this five-year period are projected to be$3,219,400. Expected savings to be generated during this I
L
iv
L
r
same time period, including one-time savings, total $6,510,000 generating a net five-year return of
$3,290,600. Annual savings of$1,440.000 are expected to be generated thereafter.
Saver Service Fees
In 1997-98, the rate advisory committee, comprised of representatives from industrial, commercial, and
r residential users, analyzed the Districts' rate structure to determine whether user fees are equitable
among residences and industry. Their review resulted in a proposal to add several non-residential user
categories that would be based upon the average flow and strength of wastewater discharged for that
r property type.
In June 1998, the Directors approved a revision of the sewer service user fee structure by expanding the
number of non-residential categodes from one to twenty-three, and basing rates on average quantity and
strength of discharge per category. The increase in the number of categories will allow for a more
equitable fee structure and may also allow for future reductions in single-family residential fees.
r SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The District received the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies Gold Award for no discharge
violations in 1998.
In August 1999, the District received the 1999 California Association of Sanitation Agencies Public
�+ Service Award (SARWG) for the agencies leadership and vision in the creation of the Santa Ana River
Watershed Group, and in fostering the watershed management approach in solving water quality
problems. SARWG specifically noted the achievement of public and private collaboration to address
,y nonpoint source issues related to dairy waste management, and its impacts on Orange County's water
quality and supply.
In September 1999, the District was awarded the City-County Communications and Marketing
Association's Silver Circle Award for "Most Creative Program With Least Dollars Spent- for the District's
public outreach efforts at the Orange County Fair.
ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS
r The District's accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and
evaluating the District's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting
- controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance
regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the
reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets.
The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the
benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and
r judgments by management. We believe that the District's internal accounting controls adequately
safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions.
Each year the District's Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. A joint works budget is first
prepared that identifies the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the
District during the year. Upon adoption, District's staff allocates the joint works budget proportionately to
each of the individual Revenue Areas and obtains individual Revenue Area budget approval. The
budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District,
or fund level. The District has adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon
purchasing standards.
r
v
r
ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS
Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the District,which are financed and operated in
a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the District to determine that the costs L
(expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a
continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are I j
evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital 64
expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the
payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the District's enterprise operations over the past two ,
fiscal years is as follows: IL'I,
Amount Percent
Summary of of Increase of Increase
Revenues and Expenses 1998-99 1997-98 Decrease Decrease
Operating revenues $67,428,617 $56,290,836 $ 11.137,781 19.79%
Operating expenses,
Including depreciation 91,855,501 85,706,557 6,148,944 7.17%
Operating income(loss) (24,426,884) (29,415,721) 4,988,837 16.96%
Non-operating income, net 32,818,175 40,746,355 (7,928,180) (19.46)% I
Net income $ 8,391,291 $ 11,330,634 $ 2,939,343 (25.94)% u
Operating revenues increased primarily because of the$11.1 million, or 19.76 percent increase in service L
charges. The increase in service charges is primarily due to(1)the decline in user fee refunds from $6.8
million in 1997-98 to only $989,000 in 1998-99, and (2)the increase in the average sewer user fee rate of
3.2 percent over the prior year. W
User fee refunds, which go back four years in most cases, are provided to commercial users who provide
documentation that their actual usage was less than what was calculated by the District's square footage formulas. The establishment of more equitable rates by the rate advisory committee have begun to limit L
the number and dollar amount of future rebates. However,the District will always be subject to rebates to
those commercial customers who can establish that their actual usage in any one year was less than the
amount that was calculated based on square footage and average use. �1
The 7.17 percent increase in net operating expenses is primarily attributable to the $6.7 million, or 18.6
percent increase in depreciation as $69.5 million of depreciable assets have been added to the balance
sheet over the prior year. Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization has actually
decreased by$500.000,or one percent, over the prior year.
The 19.46 percent, or$7.9 million decrease in net non-operating income is comprised of a$6.5 million,or
13.82 percent decrease in nonoperefing income and a $500.000, or 2.66 percent decrease in non-
operating expenses. The decrease in non-operating income includes a $9.96 million, or 35.7 percent
decrease in interest revenues and a$1.55 million, or 4.95 percent increase in property tax revenues. The
decrease in interest revenues is primarily attributable to the lower yields earned on investments over the
prior year, down 2.26 percent over the prior to 4.89 percent,and to the one-time recognition of$1.5 million
in earnings due to the increase in the fair value of investments that occurred in the prior year. The$1.55
million increase in property tax revenues is reflective of the current rebound in the real estate market as
total assessed valuations have also increased over the prior year by 2.8 percent. The 2.66 percent
decrease in non-operating expenses is primarily attributable to the decrease of $872,000 in Interest j
vi Iu,
4
r
expense over the prior year primarily due to the favorable decline in the month-to-month rates on the
District's variable rate certificates of participation debt program.
r
DEBT ADMINISTRATION
r At June 30, 1999, the District had a number of certificates of participation debt issues outstanding. These
issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, totaled $372.7 million. The District has maintained its
AA-rating from Standard and Poofs Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services.
The District's "2020 Vision" Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan proposes a 50:50 mix of pay-
as-you-go and debt financed capital improvements. In 1999-00, a $157 million of certificates of
participation debt issuance is being proposed. A total of$760 million of debt financing is forecasted over
the next ten years due to the $1,027.0 million in capital improvement requirements over the same time
period. Debt Service requirements for 1999-00 are being proposed at$41.7 million, an increase of$11.3
million,or 37.2 percent from the prior year budget and projected amounts due to the additional certificates
of participation issuance expected in the third quarter of 1999-00.
CASH MANAGEMENT
w
The District's investment portfolio, except for the District's debt service reserves, investments with the
State Local Agency Investment Fund, and overnight repurchase agreements of idle cash within the
r District's general bank account, are managed by an outside money manager, Pacific Investment
Management Company (PIMCO), who perform the daily investment activities, and by Mellon Trust, who
serve as the District's independent custodian bank. This externally managed portfolio consists of a short
w term investment pool of$18,801,000 at June 30, 1999 that has maturities out to 180 days, and a long-
term investment pool of$301,965,000 that has maturities out to five years. Investments of this externally
managed investment portfolio consist of U.S. Govemment securities, corporate bonds, and commercial
paper. Investments of the District's debt service reserves totaling$32.1 million consist of bank investment
contracts of$27.7 million with Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank, maturing out to August 1,
2013, and$4.4 million in open-ended mutual funds.
w Interest earnings for the year were $17,937,000, a decrease of$9,960,000 over the prior fiscal year total
of $27,896,000. This reduction is primarily due to the 2.26 percent decline on the average yield on
maturing investments to 4.89 percent from the prior year average of 7.15 percent, as investment balances
remained fairly close between the two fiscal years. In addition, a one-time recognition of$1.5 million in
earnings occurred in the prior year due to the increase in the fair value of investments. The decline in
interest earnings is a general result of the overall decline in the market place as PIMCO met or exceeded
all industry benchmarking requirements.
w
RISK MANAGEMENT
r
For the year ended June 30, 1999, the District was self-insured for a portion of workers' compensation
and property damage. The self-insured portion for workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per
occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit The self-insured portion for
property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess
insurance coverage to $300 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property
damage covering earthquake is $100,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside
`+ insurance coverage to $65 million. The District also maintains outside comprehensive boiler and
machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from
vii
$25,000 to $100,000. The District is insured for general liability up to $25 million per occurrence with a
self-insured portion of$100,000.
District management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1999 that would 4
materially affect the financial position of the District.
L
INDEPENDENT AUDIT
An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the District is conducted annually by
independent certified public accountants. The District selected the accounting firm of Moreland &
Associates, Inc., to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1999. The auditors' report on the
District's combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of
this report. This report renders an unqualified opinion on the District's combined financial statements for u
the year ended June 30, 1999.
CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE
IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County for the Districts'comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1998.
This was the fifth consecutive year that the Districts have received this award. In order to be awarded a h,I
Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized
comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports
must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current
comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program
requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. �l
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lj
This report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division
staff, and I would like to especially express my appreciation to Julie Pritchard who assisted in its
preparation. I would also like to thank the Districts Boards of Directors, the General Manager, and the
Director of Finance for their interest and support in conducting the financial operations of the District in a
responsible and progressive manner.
Respectfully submitted, Iu'
Michael D. White, CPA ( �
Controller IYr
F�
viii
r
r
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
r Presented to
r County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,
California
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1998
A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers
" Association of the United States and Canada to
_- government units and public employee retirement
systems whose comprehensive annual financial
r reports (CAFRs)achieve the highest
standards in government accounting
and financial reporting.
3 xo
\.../ C President
o�'I4 Dare � R • (/�L
Executive Director
r
r
ix
Ya
I�
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Board of Directors
As of June 30, 1999
AGENCY ACTIVE DIRECTOR ALTERNATE DIRECTOR I
Cities: u
Anaheim Shirley McCracken Tom Daly I
Brea Lynn Daucher Roy Moore u
Buena Park Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall `
Cypress Anna L. Piercy, Tim Keenan
Fountain Valley John Collins Laurann Cook
Fullerton Don Bankhead Jan Flory
Garden Grove Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
Huntington Beach Peter Green Dave Garofalo
Irvine Christina Shea Greg Smith
u
La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
La Palma Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
Los Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bales J�
Newport Beach Jan Debay Tom Thomson ;
Orange Mark A.Murphy Mike Spurgeon
Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
Santa Ana Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz ICJ'
Seal Beach Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
Stanton Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
Tustin Thomas R. Saharelli Jim Polls
Villa Park Russell Patterson Richard A.Freschi
Yorba Linda John M. Gullizson Gene Wisner
Samtary/Waler Districts: y
Costa Mesa Sanitary District James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
Midway City Sanitary District Joy L. Neugebauer James V. Evans
Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A. Swan Darryl Miller
County Areas:
Member of the Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith Yrl
1�
lei
y
X
U
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Organizational Chart
June 30, 1999
r
mama
r uRecroM
cexww awewxmuxr
r MMrow omu
U®Elbl
EWERILMWbW
r �
wwxwReemRm evmw wwwnw oMTRnom\ nwwlex
CEItlYNGTr MEb0.0YFe RXMIET mlNw\ TIGNLYDTI Iw111OCWG \WNCw WONCpIIM
eeYP10I111b
r
wwwEunr M XuxM XxwEe aebTwmmew IxrMwnax exTbexE\ mwlew wdxwm
rowxmunw MnuRcw roMlxmanax roxwrdXnM eeexmwM wxxxwEe ewmu bMxmu�
._ ErnTYee rowwmarwx rowxmumx roxwemana
eanimMun
r eoamer rocdwnm murc cwrouwE R.weeu wwnwwdnw ommlro
dP4TORf n1elYT. Mrl'MR {NRIe[Ilpq EpMpIMCC\ gPIX\
REReiMY ppxTENt\ WMMi W.IOiWEXO PMNW
' YXIIIB11I.11R
� WN[IIOYT:C ILWCIMAYTw MeePMP4W RIw111M1 YNPdwURM Ce101RYCnwI
MaxnouxET \wRMMa eRw.R.xmro xldrco wMbeMeM
rvEreMe YMER.R*oar
MaeM xartm.e Eunice
r xeec�uW TwMnoM awWm
MCMMIVL 6Ve1Y\
MNMWUMC dNAEWEY
r RCWXq
. . [IeCTEEIL\
pxnNYOR�MI
\IMIIIH4VIL9
Ep11XN
e[11WI.Td1
r
aROWIIY\
CM1CW
. MEMI\
xll
r
r
V
r
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Map of Service Area
June 30, 1999 r
LOS ANGELES COUNTY �e
LA HABRAry_
BREA �yry
ELL RTON Y-Im
wu,..xx 13
-' l I.1 VA" , PLACENTIA LINDA 9�F
9
J ow aenw xvc _ 2 `r�OF
9
LA UE A 5
PALM ux PA E N
P
CY RE S NAH IM VILLA O
LOS STANT N """"` PARK
0
LAMITO 6 O RANGE
3 G cxwwx.vE ' G _
g GARDEN I -
GROV
STMI ST
SE nrxn _
B red v O TUSTIINN
- - u Fo 11 sr
11 a SANTA 14
ANA „
F UNTA
VALLEY
PACIFIC `
OCEAN
HU N
BEACH I
BEACH x
i
O ro
RECLAMATION All
PLANT NO. 1 COSTP� IRVINE -.
MESA
TREATMENT a°�
PLANT
ONEWPORT N
BEACH
1989
r
9
b � �
All
r
r
r
r
r
OCSD
Financial Section
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
r
r
'r
r
iw
r
r
r
r
i
l
��
^j^11• I
ram'^
Y'
R,
3
I
r
1201 DOVE STREET,SUITE 660
��//�� � ���_//�� �� // NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660
_ Moreland &,Wdj0!%&We,*, e.Y t& (94%W 4025
1 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 570 RANCHEROS DRIVE,SUITE 260
SAN MARCOS.CA 92069
(760)]523390
September 10, 1999
The Board of Directors of the
Orange County Sanitation District
Independent Auditors'Report
We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the Orange County Sanitation District,
California (District) as of and for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, as listed in the table of contents.
These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the District's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the Combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall combined financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the District as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and cash flaws
for the years then ended in Conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated September 10,
1999, on our consideration of the District's internal Control over financial reporting and our tests of its
Compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts.
Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the Combined financial statements of the
District taken as a whole.
The year 2000 supplementary Information on page 26 is not a required part of the Combined financial
statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We
have applied certain limited procedures,which Consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the
methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However,we did not audit the
information and do not express an opinion on it. In addition,we do not provide assurance that the District is or
will become year 2000 compliant,that the District's year 2000 remediation efforts will be successful in whole or
In part, or that parties with which the District does business are or will become year 2000 Compliant.
The accompanying combining financial statements listed in the table of Contents are presented for purposes of
additional analysis and are not a required part of the Combined financial statements. The information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the Combined financial statements and, in our
opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a
whole. The statistical information listed in the table of contents was not audited by us and, accordingly, we do
not express an opinion thereon. 1
u
l�
V
L
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
1�If
lei
2
r/
.j
rl
s
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
-- COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
r
rl
.s
u
v
by
u
..i
3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT twd
Combined Balance Sheets
June 30, 1999 and 1998
u.f
1999 1998
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(note 2) $ 21.101,780 $ 25,263.084
Investments(note 2) 198.876,239 163,927,804
Receivables:
Accounts,net of allowance for unccllectibles 3,999,091 4,020,760
Accrued interest 4,379,724 5,680,898 L
Due from other governmental agencies 90,167
Total receivables 8,378,815 9,791,825
h
Inventories 4,817.568 4,394,025 N
Prepaid and other assets 813.903 307,187
Total current assets 233,988,305 203,683,925
Restricted assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(notes 2 and 4) 14,994,859 46 :Q '
Investments(note 2) 141,320,842 137,81953.
Receivables:
Accrued interest 522,258 538,821
Connection fees 1,427.960 2,061.775
Due from other governmental agencies - 158,000
Other 855.755 859,312
Total receivables 2,805,973 3,617,908
Total restricted assets 159,121,674 187,636,242 �•
Due from other governmental agencies, noncurrent(note 11) 88,340.640 88,340,640
Deferred charges 1.945,236 2,069,024
Property, plant and equipment, at cost(notes 3 and 8):
Land 7,140,674 7.140,672
Sewage collection facilities 315.363,531 319,653.231
Sewage treatment facilities 574,647,470 513,729.012
Sewage disposal facilities 90.094,215 81,830,012
General plant and administrative facilities 103,209,892 98637,497
Contruction in progress 130.968,813 156:142,014
Total property, plant and equipment 1,221,424,595 1,177.132,438
Less accumulated depreciation 417,865,344 376,288,552
Net property, plant and equipment 803,559,251 800,843,886
Excess purchase price over book value on acquired
assets(notes 5 and 8) 11,428,783 12,086.492
Other assets, at cost, less accumulated amortization 1,009,298 2,921,047
to
Total assets $ 1,299,393,187 $1,297,581,256
(Continued)
See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
4
.r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Combined Balance Sheets (Continued)
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
1999 1998
Current liabilities payable from current assets:
Accounts payable $ 6,998,462 $ 5,593,293
Accrued expenses 2,706,182 5,326,423
Other 2.213
Total current liabilities payable from current assets 9,704,644 10.921,929
r
r Current liabilities payable from restricted assets:
. _ Retentions payable 2,220,285 2,457.571
Interest payable 4,513,730 4,710,258
Deposits 2,639,643 1,817.146
...- Claims and judgments payable, current portion (note 4) 525,428 429,603
General obligation bonds payable,current portion(note 4) - 15,000
Certificates of participation payable,current portion(note 4) 12.880.000 12,105,000
Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 22.779.086 21.534,578
.r
Long-term liabilities:
-- Compensated absences(note 4) 3,237,800 3,065,600
Claims and judgments payable, noncurrent portion(note 4) 937,888 1,002,408
Arbitrage payable(note 4) 303,500
Certificates of participation payable, noncurrent portion,
net of discount(note 4) 359.854,634 372,653,677
Deferred revenue 80,408 80,408
Total long-term liabilities 364,414,230 376.802,093
r
Total liabilities 396.897,960 409,258,600
Fund equity:
Contributed capital (notes 5 and 8) 246,276.971 241.153.400
Retained earnings 656,218,256 647,169,256
Total fund equity 902,495.227 888,322,656
Total liabilities and fund equity $1.299,393,187 $1.297,581,256
rr
See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
5
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings
For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998
1999 1998
Operating revenues:
Service charges $ 67.017,670 $ 55,961464 Yr�
Permit and inspection fees 410,947 329272
1
Total operating revenues 67.428,617 5S1290,836 �I
Operating expenses other than depredation and amortization:
Salaries and benefits 4,811,246 4,131.704
Utilities 2,900 434.588
Supplies 6,392 91,713
Contractual services 1,537,793 1,166,566
Directors'fees 74,169 91,606
Meetings and training 5,617 6,357
Repairs and maintenance 3,140 138,774 t
Joint operating expense allocation,net(note 6) 42,458,381 43.211,557 ,Vr
Other 464,215 592,620
Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization 49,363,853 49,865,475 v
Operating income before depreciation and amortization 18,064.764 6,425,361 I{
Depreciation on contributed facilities - 72,036 L
Depreciation on other facilities 41,833,939 35,111,337
Amortization of excess purchase price over book value
on acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 657.709 657,709
Operating loss (24,426,884) (29.415.721)
Non-operating revenues:
Property taxes 32,836.628 31,287,109
Interest 17,937,293 27.896.829
Other 2,050.759 2,124,182
Total non-operating revenues 62,833,680 61,308,120
Non-operating expenses:
Interest 18,359.361 19,232,169
Other 1,658.144 1,329,596 ` I
Total non-operating expenses 20,015.505 20,561,765 -ieF
n
Net income 8,391,291 11.330,634
Add depreciation and amortization related to contributed equity
(notes 5 and 8) 657,709 729,746
Net increase in retained earnings 9,D49,000 12,050.379 .�
Retained earnings, beginning of year 647,169,256 635.108.877
Retained eemings,end of year $656,218,256 $647,169,256
See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements,
6
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998
1999 1998
r Cash bows from operating activities:
Operating loss $ (24.426.884) $ (29,415,721)
Adustments to reconcile operating loss to
net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation 41,833.939 35,183,373
--- Amortization 657,709 657,709
Other non-operating revenues 2,060,759 2,124,182
Other non-operating expenses (1,632,356) (1,235,955)
(Increase)decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable 21.669 9.877,911
ti Due from other governmental agencies 248,167 2,412,318
Other receivables 3.657 (724,088)
Inventories (423,543) 6.626
r, Prepaid and other assets (506,716) (143,587)
Other assets,net of amort¢ation 1,911.749 (609,450)
- Increase(decrease)in liabilities:
Accounts payable 1,405,169 (2,763,560)
Accrued expenses (2,316,741) 299,179
_ Retentions payable (237.286) 794,486
Deposits 822,497 (1,104,145)
r Other liabilities (2,213) 2,213
_ Compensated absences 172,200 250,800
Claims and judgments payable 31,305 (876.470)
r Net cash provided by operations 19,722,981 14,735,821
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
r Proceeds from property taxes 32,835,628 31,287,109
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Additions to property,plant and equipment (44,549,304) (48,768,893)
Interest paid,net of amounts capitalized (18,474,932) (20,007,881)
-- Principal payments on certificates of participation (12,105,000) (11,305,000)
Principal payments on bonds (15,000) (15,000)
Proceeds from capital contributions 6.416,095 3,550,031
Net cash used for capital and
related financing activities (68,729,141) (76,546,743)
. . Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the sale of investments 967.079.676 1,727,641.475
r Purchases of investments (1,005,529,423) (1,755.107,009)
Interest received 19,255,030 27,257,178
Net cash used for investing activities (19,194,717) (208.356)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (35,365,249) (30,732,169)
`. Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 71,461,888 102,194,057
._ Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $ 36,096,639 $ 71,461,888
r
See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
7
m
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998 I 1
Y�
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Reporting Entity u
As of June 30, 1998 the organization known as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
(Districts) included the operations of nine separate Districts operating within the County of Orange, !
California. In April of 1998, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution u
No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single
sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District. This action was
recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify
governance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline
decision-making and consolidate accounting and auditing processes.
Effective July 1, 1998, the organization became known as the Orange County Sanitation District
L
(District). All assets, liabilities, and equity of the Districts were assumed by the newly formed
District. The boundaries of the nine previous districts have been maintained for the purpose of
collecting sewer user fees at the previously established rate schedules; consequently, the District
is currently comprised of nine separate revenue areas.
The District is managed by an administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the
Agencies or Cities which are serviced by the District. The District owns and operates certain
sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County,
California. The District utilizes joint operating and capital outlay amounts to pay joint operating and
construction costs of each revenue area. These joint costs are allocated to each revenue area
based on gallons of sewage flow.
The District is independent of and overlaps other formal political jurisdictions. There are many
governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the District's jurisdiction;
however, financial information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial
statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board "
(GASS)Statement 14: J
• Each entity has an independently elected governing body.
• Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations.
• The District is neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of
any of the entities.
• Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. l '
Basis of Accounting
The District operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are rj
financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the
Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of
providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily `
through user charges. L
Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and
reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of
economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues
(Continued)
8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred.
-- Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year end. The District applies all GASB
r pronouncements currently in effect as well as Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements
and Interpretations,Accounting Principal Board Opinions and Accounting Research Bullefins of the
Committee on Accounting Procedure issued on or before November 30, 1989.
r Operating Plans
--. Each year, District staff prepares an annual operating plan which is adopted by the Board of
Directors. The annual operating plan is used to serve as a basis for monitoring financial progress,
^• estimating the levy and collection of taxes, and determining future service charge rates. During the
_ year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operation dictate.
Cash Equivalents
Investments with original maturifies of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
Investments
All investments are stated at fair value (the value at which a financial instrument could be
. - exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale).
..
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in first-out basis.
r
Property. Plant and Equipment
Outlays for property, plant, equipment, and construction in progress are recorded in the revenue
r area which will use the asset Such outlays may be for individual revenue area assets or for a
revenue area's share of joint assets.
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost except for assets acquired by contribution,
which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor, materials;
outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering,
purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general
expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period. There
were no capitalized interest costs during the fiscal years ended June 30. 1999 and 1998.
Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the assets
using the straight-line method. The District generally follows the guidelines of estimated useful
lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of Accounts for
Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 75 years. The following are estimated useful lives
for major classes of depreciable assets: Sewage collection facilities—50 years, Sewage treatment
facilities —40 years, Sewage disposal facilities—40 years, and General plant and administrative
facilities—11.5 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged
r
directly to contributed facilities.
_. Amortization
Amortization of the excess purchase price over the book value of assets acquired is provided
using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 30 years.
r
(Continued)
_- 9
L'
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT II ;
Notes to Combined Financial Statements v�r
June 30, 1999 and 1998
L+
Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective
terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates(note 4).
Restricted Assets
Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements.
Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates
of participation,joint treatment works expansion,and capital expenditures for improvements.
Interest Rate Swaps )
The District enters Into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of
certificates of participation as part of an overall financing program, These interest rate swaps are
accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is 1 I
accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap L
agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are deferred and amortized to
interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements.
Compensated Absences
The District's employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation J i
and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and : hours for
vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively.
Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave" at a rate of between 60 and 200
hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a
maximum of 400 hours.
Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the i
accompanying financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences." In determining
the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the District assumes that all employee's
accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out. 1
Claims and Judgments art
The District records estimated losses, net of any Insurance coverage under its self-insurance
program (see Self-Insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been
incurred and when the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable includes
an estimate for incurred but unreported claims. ,
Property Taxes
Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July n
1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. lY�,
The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the District in installments
during the year. Property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are
available to finance current operations. `
The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at L
time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The )
District receives a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978
period.
(Continued)
10
U
rn/
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
Self-Insurance Plans
For the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, the District was self-insured for portions of workers'
compensation, property damage, and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers'
_. compensation Is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to
the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other
.. perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $300 million for fire,
flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is
$100,000 or 5% per unit of insurance,whichever is greater,with outside insurance coverage to$65
,r million. The District also maintains outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a
$100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000.
The District is substantially self-insured for general liability coverage. During the past three fiscal
years there have been no settlements in excess of covered amounts. There were no significant
changes in insurance coverage during the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998.
District management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1999 that would
materially affect the financial position of the District.
.. _ Claims against the District are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are
charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but
,... not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies.
- Contributed Equity
'r Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend
_ existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect. Capital replacement charges
represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of
fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as
contributed equity.
Deferred Compensation Plan
r
The District offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with
Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the District to defer a
,r portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until
termination, retirement,death or for unforeseeable emergency.
During the year ended June 30, 1998, the plan was amended so that the assets of the plan are
r held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. Since the plan
assets are administered by an outside party and are not subject to the claims of the District's
general creditors, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
32, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred
Compensation Plans, the plan's assets and liabilities are not included within the District's financial
-- statements.
Eliminations and Restatements
As a result of creating a consolidated entity, inter-district receivables and payables which were
r. originally reported within the June 30, 1998 financial statements have been eliminated. Similarly,
all fiscal year 1998-99 inter-district receivables and payables have been eliminated and are not
r'
(Continued)
11
d
ti
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30. 1999 and 1998
reported within the June 30, 1999 combined financial statements. Certain reclassifications have
been made to the prior year data to conform to the current year presentation.
M
(2) Cash and Investments
The District follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held 5 I
by fiscal agents. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated to the L
various funds based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest income from cash and
investments of funds excluded from pooled cash and investments is credited directly to the related
fund.
Deposits
Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the
L
bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation. The California Government
Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by
pledging government securities equal to 110% of the deposits or by pledging first trust deed L
mortgage notes equal to 150%of the deposits.
Deposits are categorized herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board 1 j
(GASB) Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at �+
year-end.
Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the District or by its agent in the
District's name.
Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or
agent in the District's name. �,rt
Category 3- Uncollaterelized or collateralized but the pledged securities are not held in the
District's name.
Restricted investments, as classified on the balance sheet, are in reserve funds held by Chase
Bank and State Street Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 4). At June 30, 1999 and
1998, these reserve funds were limited to investments in money market mutual funds and to
deposits within bank investment contracts (BIC). Although the BIC with State Street Bank is 60
classified as Category 3, as shown below, the depositor, AIG Matched Funding Corporation, is
required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract �
if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities of AIG falls below a S&P rating of"AA-"
or below a Moody's rating of"Aa3".
Investments
Statutes authorize the District to invest in obligations of the U.S. Govemment, state and local
governmental agencies, negotiable certificates of deposits, bankers acceptances, commeroiat
paper, reverse repurchase agreements, and a variety of other investment instruments which are 1
allowable under the California Government Code section 53600 at seq.
Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASB Statement No. 3, to give an
indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at year-end.
(Continued)
12
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the District or its agent in the District's
name.
Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial
institution's trust department or agent in the District's name.
Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial
institution's trust department or agent but not in the District's name.
The District invests in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on
deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1999. the District's total demand cash
bank balance amounted to $968,889, of which $658,000 was invested in overnight repurchase
agreements.
Investments Not Subject to Categorization
Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County
Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASS Statement No. 3 does not require
,r categorization of investment pools managed by another government Also cash held by trustees
are not categorized because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open-ended
— mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the District
who are acting in accordance with agreements entered into with the District All such investments
are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by the GASB.
- The management of LAW has indicated to the District that as of June 30, 1999 the amortized cost
of the pool was$36.849,505,673 and the fair value of the pool was $36,801,515,428. Included in
LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities or similar products in the form of
- structured notes, totaling $1,524,350,000 and asset-backed securities totaling $351,942,000.
LAIF's(and the District's)exposure to risk(credit, market or legal) is not currently available.
` A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 1999, is categorized as follows:
June 30, 1999
Carrying Amount Bank
Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category
_ Demand cash accounts $ (414,202) 310,889 2
Bank Investment Contracts-
-with Chase Bank - 4,482.935 4.482.935 3
-with Slate Street Bank 23,227,WD 23,227,00D 3
Total Deposits 41( 4,202) 27,709,935 28,020.824
Investments:
v Repurchase agreement 558,000 - 3
- Cash and investments with LAW 14,770.093 8,345,691 N/A
Cash and investments with OCIP 5,673 3.770 N/A
.., U.S. Government Securities 133,175,698 75,249,572 1
Commercial Paper 6.210,824 3,509.363 1
- Corporate Bonds 65.304,394 36,899,580 1
Mutual Funds 266,641 150.606 N/A
s Cash and investments
held with fiscal agents:
-- Mutual funds 4,447,184 N/A
Total Investments 220,392,221 128,605.788
Total Carrying Amount $219.978,019 158,315,701
(Continued)
13
fr
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
Cash and cash equivalents and
investments as reported on the
combined balance sheet:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 21,101.780 14.994,859
Investments 198,876,239 141,320,842
$219,978,019 156,315,701
At June 30, 1999, the U.S. Government Securities investments included mortgage-backed
securities totaling $62,361,449, and the U.S. Government Securities and Corporate Bond
investments included floating-rate notes totaling $38,441,361. d
A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 1998 is categorized as follows:
June 30. 1998 1
Carrying Amount BankMMM
Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category
Demand cash accounts $ 858,086 (1,736,352) 503,589 2
Bank Investment Contracts-
-with Chase Commerce Bank - 4.482.958 4.482,958 3
-with State Street Bank 13,813.498 13.813,498 3
Total Deposits 658, 16,560.104 18,800,045
Investments:
Repurchase agreement 3,158,000 - 3
Cash and investments with LAIF 9.239,402 5,390,730 WA
Cash and investments with OCIP - 6.206 WA
U.S. Government Securities 126.025,114 117,453,595 1
Commercial Paper 2.562,912 1,495,333 1
Corporate Bonds 48.647,374 28,324,970 1
Cash and investments
held with fiscal agents:
Mutual funds - 14,787,398 WA
Total Investments 188,532,802 167,458,230
Total Carrying Amount $189,190,888 184,018,334
Cash and cash equivalents and
investments as reported on the
June 30, 1998 combined
balance sheet:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 26,263,084 46,198.804
Investments 163.927.804 137.819,530
$189,190.888 184.018,334
At June 30, 1998, the U.S. Government Securities, Commercial Paper, and Corporate Bond
investments included asset-backed securities totaling $32,491,064. and the Corporate Bonds
investments included floating-rate corporate notes totaling $25,646,068. At June 30, 1998, the
District's total demand cash bank balance amounted to $3,661,589. of which $3,158,000 was
invested in overnight repurchase agreements. The management of LAIF has indicated to the
District that as of June 30, 1998, the amortized cost of the pool was $31,920,000,841 and the
estimated fair value of the pool was $31,932,227,970. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are
certain derivative securities or similar products in the form of structured notes totaling
$977,100,000 and asset-backed securities totaling$388,537,000.
(Continued)
14
u
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
(3) Property, Plant, Equipment and Construction in Progress
,r Property, plant, equipment,and construction in progress, at cost, at June 30, 1999 and 1998 are as
follows:
Property, Plant and Equipment
r 1999 1998
Revenue Treatment Collection
-- Area Plant Facilities Total Total
s 1 $ 86,894,516 7,054,233 93,948,749 84,580,307
2 233,024,296 97,692,455 330,716,751 305,647,559
3 241,486,219 71,216,544 312,702,763 292,012,553
5 31,655,177 34,423,171 66,078,348 63,034,919
6 28,991,098 5,278,131 34,269,229 31,620.754
7 81,331,302 42,936,097 124,267,399 114,409,820
11 51,008,485 19,230,748 70,239,233 68,545,321
13 9,324.069 3,175,032 12,499,101 11,128,034
14 20,124,896 25,609,313 45,734.209 50,011,157
783,840.058 306,615,724 1,090,455,782 1,020.990,424
Construction in Progress
1999 1998
.. Revenue Treatment Collection
Area Plant Facilities Total Total
1 $ 10,848.613 53,503 10,902,116 15,779,389
•+ 2 27,878,518 2,086,220 29,964.738 41,474,175
_ 3 27,954,738 12,284,195 40,238.933 45,618,989
5 4,018,696 4,902,446 8,921,142 7,628.943
6 3,216,331 6,683,516 9,899,847 8,063,160
7 8,278,515 3,925,677 12,204,192 15.669,322
- - 11 5,311,169 7,979,993 13,291,162 16,422,993
13 835,164 - 835,164 1,314,441
14 1,823,267 2,888,252 4,711,519 4,170,602
- 90,165,011 40,80 3,802 130,968,813 156,142.014
Total property, plant
and equipment $874,005,069 347,419,526 1,221,424,595 1,177,132,438
r
r
(Continued)
_. 15
r
f�
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4
Notes to Combined Financial Statements r+
June 30, 1999 and 1998
I
Yr
(4) Long-Term Debt
The following is a summary of the changes in long-term debt for the year ended June 30, 1999: ' t
Balance Balance �I
July 1, June 30,
1998 Additions Deletions 1899
Arbitrage payable $ - $ 303,500 It - $ 303,500
Compensated absences 3,065.600 172,200 - 3,237800
Claims and judgments payable 1,432,011 31,305 - 1,463:316
General obligation bonds 16.000 - 15,000
Certificates of participation 386.240.000 - 12,105.000 374,135.000 1 '
Totals $390,762,611 $ 607,005 $12.120.000 $379,139,616 L
Arbitrage Payable
V
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act) substantially revised the treatment to be afforded to the
eamings on the proceeds of tax exempt debt and requires the District to calculate and remit i
rebatable arbitrage earnings to the Internal Revenue Service. Certain of the District's debt and y
interest earnings on the proceeds thereof are subject to the requirements of the Act. The Districts
liability at June 30, 1999 is$303,500,
Compensated Absences 60
The District's policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will
be paid in future years from future resources. The District's liability at June 30, 1999 is$3,237,800. Lit
Claims and Judgments Payable L
The District is self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1. The following is a
summary of the claims and judgments payable as of June 30, 1999 and 1998.
1998-99 1997-98
Claims and judgments payable at July 1 $ 1,432,011 $ 2,308,481
Claims incurred during the fiscal year 619,588 (498.450)
Payments on claims during the fiscal year (588,283) (378,020)
Claims and judgments payable at June 30 1,463,316 1,432.011 A�
Less: current portion (626.428) (429,603)
Total long-term claims and judgments payable $ 937,888 $ 1.002.408
L
General Obligation Bonds f
1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at 1°/were paid in full in January 1999. L1
The District's liability at June 30, 1999 is zero.
(Continued) Lrt
16
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
r Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
Certificates of Participation
The District issues certificates of participation in order to finance construction of the treatment
^+ facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest In the semi-
annual interest payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of
lawfully available funds of the District, All of the District's certificates of participation are 25-year
issues except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issue.
Certificates of participation at June 30, 1999 are summarized as follows:
1900-1992 Series A Certificates of Padicipalion $ 85,800,000
1990-1992 Series 8 Certificates of Participation 21,815,000
1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 88.400,000
1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 133.770,000
1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 44.350.000
- Total certifictes of participation payable 374,135,000
„d Less: current portion (12,880,000)
Less: unamortized discount (1,400,366)
Total long-term certificates of participation $ 359,854,634
r
1986 Certificates of Participation
On August 13, 1986, District Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of$117,000,000 of certificates
of participation. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was
refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of
Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasence.
- 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation
r On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of
participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the
certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The
,r weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 2.9%. Annual principal
payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991.
All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate Irrevocable letters of credit
issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 16, 2000,
_ unless terminated earlier. The District has the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at
an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium.
1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation
On May 1, 1991, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $117,555,000 of
certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The
weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 5.9%. Annual principal
— payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an
original Issue discount of$3,731,496.
V
(Continued)
r
17
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i
Notes to Combined Financial Statements Vr+
June 30, 1999 and 1998
The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate
proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$4,482,935 is being held by Texas Commerce Bank,
the trustee (note 2). In addition, Federel Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond
insurance for the certificates.
On December 3,1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was 1 I
refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of i+
Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance.
On September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was `y
refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see
below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance.
1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation
On September 1, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98,500,000 of
certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The
interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest
rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 was 2.9%.
Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993.
The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,850,000. which was
funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2).
December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation
On December 3, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$160,600,000 1
of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted
by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due
August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. '
On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange
swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55%and receive a
variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing I
agent on a notional amount of$160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for 6�
as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as
interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement.
The 20-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013.
The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 5
certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92
Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with
the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt
service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the
defeased certificates of participation are not included in the District's combined financial .L
statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt still outstanding at June 30, 1999
was$133,770,000.
N
(Continued)
18
WI
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
v
The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate
proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$13,377,000 is being held by State Street Bank, the
r trustee(note 2). In addition,AMBAC provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates.
September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation
On September 2, 1993. Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000
of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted
by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due
August 1, beginning August 1, 1995.
r
_. On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate
exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed Interest rate of 4.56%
and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the
remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is
accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is
r accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap
agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2016.
The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the
+ 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance
defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for
all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the
liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the District's combined
financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30,
1999 was approximately$44,350,000.
Annual Amortization Requirements
The annual requirements to amortize all debt related to certificates of participation as of June 30,
r 1999, including interest payments of$221,450,442, are as follows,
Certificates
Year Ending of
11 June 30, Participation
2000 $ 34,627.746
2001 34,738,246
2002 34,570,664
2003 34,931,404
2004 35,154.005
r Thereafter 421,563,377
$595,585.442
r
(Continued)
r
19
r
I ,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements lid
June 30, 1999 and 1998
L
(5) Contributed Equity
The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the years ended June 30, 1999 1
and 1998, respectively:
capital Amortization I I
contributions of
from Irvine Excess
Connection Capital Depredation Ranch Purchase
Fees Replace- on Water Price Over 1 '
Revenue Balance at EameE ment Contributed Distnd Book Value Balance at
Area No. July (Expereed) charges Facilities (note 8) (note 8) June 30
Fiscal Year Endino June 30.1999 1
1 S 5.953.135 $ 233578 $ - s - s - $ - $ 6.186.713 YI
2 55.108p47 4.074.689 141208 - - - 59.324.344
3 35.054213 2.734.075 - - - - 37,818288
5 14.830.643 178237 - - - 15,008,780 + '
6 5.450,716 97.808 - - - - 5,548.524 Y
7 18,653,650 741.342 - - - - 19.395.002
11 14.532.189 308.777 - - - - 14,8411956 I
13 8,036,818 1,135,175 - - - - 9,171,993 .)4i
14 $3.503.679 (752jill (3,110,802) (657,709) 78.982,381
Tolals $ 241.153.400 $ 8.750.874 S 141.208 $ S (3.110.802) $ (667.709) S 246,2T6.Wl
Ya
Fiscal Year EMim June 30,1998
1 $ 6.272,M $ 116,043 S (435,685) S - $ - S - S 5,953,135
2 51.9its,917 4.238.987 (1,116,457) - - - 55,tOB,M7 L
3 33.237.958 3,150,283 (1,304.028) - - - 35.054.213
5 14.366,049 629,769 (166.275) - - - 14,830,543
6 6,354,329 297,621 (121.234) - - - 5,460,716
] 19,140263 (25.176) (389,391) (72,035) - - 18,853,66o L
11 13,423,072 1,403,75E (294.639) - - - 14.532.189
13 7,384,120 697= (44564) - - - 8.036,818
14 85203,788 752,BW (238.827) (1,556,380) (667,709) 83.503.679
Toll S 236.3682Zn $ 11251,352 $ (4.180.100) $ (72.035) $ (1,556,380) $ (657,709) S 241.153.400 1�p��
(6) Joint Fund Expense Allocation ,jam.
The District utilizes joint and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs,
which are subsequently allocated to the revenue areas based on gallons of sewage flow. A I
summary of joint operating costs follows: +V
iL
i�
(Continued) L
20
L
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
1999 1998
Revenue:
Service charges $ 2,434.615 $ 3,564,837
Other 1,290,765 1,158,756
Total Revenue 3,725,280 4.713,693
r
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits 23.997,716 24,593.619
Supplies 4,691,395 5.638,556
Contractual 9.074.953 7,030,378
Repairs and maintenance 4,346,962 3,986,898
Utilities 3,317.113 2,893,535
r Other 755,623 3,882,165
Total Expenses 46,183,881 47,925,150
s, Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 42.458,381 $ 43.211,557
(7) Pension Plan
The District participates in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System (OCERS), a
cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan which is governed and administered
r by a nine member Board of Retirement OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of
the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death,
disability, and cost-of-living benefits. OCERS issues a stand-alone comprehensive annual
r financial report which can be obtained from OCERS at 2223 Wellington Avenue, Santa Ana,
California 92701.
The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was$28,726,693 for the year ended June 30, 1999;
$27,943,478 for the year ended June 30, 1998; and$27,918,636 for the year ended June 30, 1997.
The District's total payroll was $32,675,487 in 1999; $29,684,325 in 1998; and $29,483,892 in
1997.
w
Benefits
All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who refire at or after age 50 with
r ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the
retirement allowance is based upon the members age at retirement, the member's "final compen-
sation"as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under
OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on
reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits.
Contributions
r
As a condition of participation under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of
1937, members are required to contribute a percentage of their annual compensation to OCERS.
r Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%-7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%,
respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The District is required to make periodic
(Continued)
r
21
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT )
Notes to Combined Financial Statements 61
June 30, 1999 and 1998
contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered
employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will
fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they refire. The contribution
requirement for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997 were$3,576,050, $2,684,493, and
$2,876,050, respectively. This total contribution consisted of $2,729,376 from the District and
$846,674 from employees in 1999; $1,889,570 from the District and $794,923 from employees in I
1998; and $2,085,956 from the District and $790,094 from employees in 1997. The District's L�
contributions represented 9.5%, 6.8%, and 7.5% of covered payroll and employee contributions
represented 2.9%, 2.8%, and 2.8% of covered payroll for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998,
and 1997, respectively. The Distrcts contributions for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and u
1997 represented 3.98%,2.9%, and 3.2% of total contributions required of all participating entities,
respectively.
� 1
(8)Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District W
Revenue Area No. 14 'I j
The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the ICI
Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD") as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement.
IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 far an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the
Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per
day), together with a pro-rata interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day.
The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June I
30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of $19,979,000 at June
30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District
No. 14. As of June 30, 1999, $8,550,217 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book I
value was amortized. U
IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually
fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving L
fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement,
which contribution amounted to $3,110,802 in 1999 and $1,556,380 in 1998 (see note 5). The
contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet.
Revenue Area No. 5
IRWD has entered into an agreement with the District to provide funding to Revenue Area No. 5 for
the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal
facilities to be used by IRWD (the "Downcoast Agreement"). No new funding occurred in 1999 or
1998. The agreement also provides that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees Yy
related to development in the Downcoast Area(as defined in the Downcoast Agreement).
(9) Segment Information
L
The District consists of nine revenue areas which provide sewerage services and are financed
primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the revenue areas, in thousands of dollars,
are as follows for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998:
(Condnued) L
22
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
r Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r
1999
Depredation Net
Property and Operating Net Change to
Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed
Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (Loss) (Loss) Capital
r 1 $ 2,094 $ 6,604 $ 4.090 $ (2,625) $ (2.098) $ 234
2 10,085 21,645 12.549 (6,355) Z912 4,216
3 10,976 21,810 12,385 (4,824) 6.249 2,734
5 2,903 2,637 2.242 (1,775) 1,219 178
6 1,337 3.632 1,424 282 1,964 98
7 3,164 5,870 4,585 (4,075) (1,138) 741
11 2,277 4.169 Z708 (1.830) 649 309
13 - 1,043 424 82 682 1,135
14 19 2,085 (3,304) (2,048) (4,521)
r Total $ 32.836 $ 67.429 $ 42.492 $ (24.427) $ 8,391 $ 5,124
r Net Total Assets Due From Due to
Additions (Including Due Other Other Net
Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total
Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity
1 $ 4,052 $ 89,518 $ 840 $ 10.899 $ 589 $ 46,706 $ 29,939
2 12,341 389.481 6,768 2.063 57.565 122,772 258,956
3 14,673 390,080 4,885 3.321 92,844 116,606 263,902
5 4.318 89.879 299 1,041 15.482 20,884 65,469
8 4,513 62,214 4,865 991 23,835 15,922 44,134
r 7 5.480 127.310 466 5,765 13,995 25,604 94,008
11 (242) 90,784 2,565 4.665 9,210 23,633 61,322
13 757 24,419 148 747 1,985 292 23,228
r 14 (1,343) 66.736 10.193 1,537 8,778 1,716 61,539
Total S 44,549 $ 1.330,421 $ 31.029 $ 31,029 $ 224,283 $ 374,135 $ 902,495
r
r
r
r
(Continued)
23
r
i
d
I
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
49
1998
Depreciation Net
Property and Operating Net Change to V
Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed
Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (Loss) (Loss) Capital
1 $ 2,008 $ 5.696 $ 3,138 $ (2,732) $ (1,581) $ (320)
2 9,596 18,232 10,330 (7,345) 4,276 3.123
3 10,637 18,553 10,128 (5,796) 8,165 1,846
5 2,661 1,960 1,902 (2,400) 1,335 464
6 1,194 3,229 1,250 297 2,440 96
7 3,024 4,362 3,850 (5,333) (1,523) (487)
11 2,167 3,517 2,327 (2,181) 782 1,109 L
13 - 742 312 (71) 725 653
14 2.604 (3,855) (3,289) (1.699)
Total $ 31,287 $ 56.291 $ 35.841 $ (29,416) $ 11.330 $ 4.785 I,.I
Net Total Assets Due From Due to L
Additions (Including Due Other Other Net
Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total t
Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity J
1 $ 6,622 $ 93,197 $ 840 $ 10,737 $ 225 $ 48,208 $ 31,804
2 12,235 385,590 6,768 237 52,104 126,872 251,828
3 17,010 384,084 4,885 2,177 89.669 120,251 254,918 4
5 3,141 87,827 299 1,144 17,039 21,687 64,072
6 295 60,146 4,740 991 23.264 16,395 42,072
7 11,016 127,931 466 4,928 14,440 26,454 94,403 L
11 4,373 91,163 340 4,781 6,486 24,306 60,364
13 862 22,616 148 611 2.079 300 21,411
14 (6.857) 72,269 8,657 1,537 6.110 1,764 67,451 I
Total $ 48,697 $ 1,324,723 $ 27,143 $ 27,143 $ 211,416 $ 388,237 $ 888,323 (�
L
(10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures
Revenue Area No. 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1999 and 1998 of
$17,443,183 and $16,052,791, respectively. This deficit is expected to be eliminated by revised V
service charges in future years. '' I
01)Contingencies LJ
On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pools
(collectively) filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. On May 2, L'
1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division
(Continued)
24
L
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1999 and 1998
r ('Bankruptcy Court"), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the Pool and
Pool Participants.
On May 15, 1996, the settlement agreement, as amended by the County of Orange Plan of
Adjustment, was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The Settlement provided for the District to
receive 'Settlement Secured Claims' against the County. The Settlement Secured Claims are
secured by a first-priority secured interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered
by the County from third party defendants. The District also received 'Repayment Claims'. The
repayment claims are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries
'w by the County from third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an 'allowed' claim in the
County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement.
Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this
litigation. A litigation fund has been formed by the pool participants with approximately $50 million
available to pursue litigation. The District has recorded $88,340,640 as a noncument receivable
on its June 30, 1999 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of
investments in the Orange County Investment Pool. While collectibility, of the receivable from the
County cannot presently be determined, it is the opinion of District Management that the effect of
non-payment of the claims would not materially affect the financial position of the District.
.r
r
r
25
r
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT L
Required Supplementary Information(Unaudited)
Impact of Year 2000
J
The year 2000 issue is the result of shortcomings in many electronic data processing systems and other
electronic equipment that may adversely affect the District's operations. The District's management and
staff have given top priority to the District's plan to ensure that all of its computer systems will remain L
operational in light of"Year 2000' concerns. The District's year 2000 remediation plan consists of an
inventory and risk assessment of all systems, renovation and testing of systems, and implementation of
updated systems where necessary, including interfaces with systems outside of the District. In addition,the District has developed a contingency plan that will be put into effect if unforseen problems arise. L
In October 1998. the District began conducting an assessment of operational systems that affect the I
delivery of sewer services to determine if they will be adversely impacted by year 2000 software failures. Li
The assessment was completed in September 1999, and the District began testing operational systems in
January 1999. The testing will continue through December 1999. The District believes that the
operational systems should not be adversely impacted by year 2000 software failures. At June 30, 1999
the District had no material outstanding commitments related to the year 2000 assessment.
In November 1998, the District began to assess the possible effects on its operations of the year 2000
readiness of its key suppliers and subcontractors. Most of the key suppliers and subcontractors have
responded to the District's year 2000 questionnaires. Most have indicated they are in the process of
making their own year 2000 preparations and adjustments. Additionally,the District has made reasonable
inquiries in an effort to assess the compliance of those institutions responsible for transmitting debt
service payments to the holders of the District's outstanding debt. All have indicated they are or will be
year 2000 compliant.
At this time, the District is not aware of any circumstances that would impede achievement of its year V
2000 remediation plan, nor does it anticipate that the cost of addressing the year 2000 issue will have a
materially adverse impact on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. However,
because of the unprecedented nature of the year 2000 issue, its effects and the success of related
remediation efforts will not be fully determinable until the year 2000 and thereafter. The above description
of the District's year 2000 remediation plan is not a guarantee those systems and equipment (including
those of parties with which the District does business)will be year 2000 compliant
� I
H
ll
u
u
L
{J
26
U
V
J
6
I
�1
u
1
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
J
r
' I
V
Li
I
u
27
MWE MUM SANITATION M ITUCT
C.MnIn,Balance SI t
June W.1B0
NAM Compereew TOM.Nr Jul1e W.1 MB
Rawnue Ara. R.wnuo Ma. Revmun Mee Reumue Nee Rewnua Ma Rewnua Ma Rewnua Nee RevMlueNm Revenue Nas Randall
No,I No led.3 Nos Nee NO.T No.11 No.13 No.14 Ended. 100 MM
C.Aeeele:
caMaMaeMequlvelem4 S M.771 S 4.040.142 5 6.60.26T i I,7113aM 5 1,820.457 s 1,7N,091 S 1.1134,513 $ 240.053 s ND 5 5 21,101.7m S M.2N.0N
InwMne.le 8,791,00,11 4s,BB1,B00 81A15,a7 18JINNO 16.099.575 10,906.742 9,749,W0 2.2e2,410 Saw teal 163,1127A04
R.I.M.
Aarenle 575A06 1,350.640 1,OT,MB INX2 111 .120 306,66E 329.292 40,N5 MAIN - 3.BBBA81 4.020,711D
AOssasd n18resl 4NA79 I.3M481 1.313.017 172.123 177,617 4M.204 264.097 62.BB6 112.121 - 4X9.7G 5ABII.M
Due SamoMerrewnueueee eMA49 9,7111127 4A54,00 20A11 4A84.70 All 2AMa0 MAN t0.M2,B40 (31,OM.5071 - -
ouaM1ammmo,'wmmental
Weidi li
Toll lmdve9lm III'll 0,510,BW 7.2]6,6311 sm.W6 5a 'M 1218,M9 %I0,757 241MID toaM.M] (31,029A0T) 5a70A15 9.79"m
lnwnbMe 513.03 1A10.700 IAN22I 18633o 195.503 480.010 Mg SB,2W 123.328 4.517,550 4A&A25
Pm id.MGMMmeeR 06.765 3S3,2M 244,1715 31,908 33,043 02,08 all BA4S MUM 813.B0 30,18T
TOM..IaeeaM 12.20,327 81.810,M 98,912,398 18.554,725 25403,IN 2OAR020 14.21Q 7W 2.812,223 IOAM,eM (31100,197) 233.9M.W5 203tall
ReaWcleS Moo.
ceae¢ndduMequlvalanb 429.I93 6.2M.476 3AM,1M 1,1B7,MB 101,022 701,928 1a0A01 92211% M.N$ 14.09a.15% 46.196"
InvmmrenM 4.060.06 S6.i10.132 30818,975 11,0011.505 852,OW Illi 12440,813 (101,342 51131.1141 141.320.11,12 137A19=
Restaxalee:
Ad.O.Nterete 83,478 10.02 176,535 24,730 9,472 21,916 13,426 - - 522.2" Nli
Omnmtl.n lees 12AST 0421107 316.037 Mi 10,697 N.m 211,M6 68.502 - 1,42T,900 2,051,]]5
Due M1.m.Mm O.mmmi
,and. - - - I5%D00
ft., M90 276001 203.701 TOAD] wasps T7R10 BT,1M1 BSfi.T55 159Al2
TOM Onsou51n 1401223 1,112A90 1124.1173 141.344 58.213 14OA72 311,3111 89.502 2,1106,973 W7.901,
Tola11u61Ued.... 4.60.01 55.052.587 38,20,01 12.315,695 1,10,33E 7A68,1102 13,001,670 B,B63.M0 6. 01.068 150,121A74 161,5435.242
owM1pm OMxeowmmmW
ap4nUm.nondumnl B.Sa2,403 36,40A90 M,20.5,SBS 5,352,207 4.10,00 10.4113,915 8,515A53 3a72.190 1a113,013 BB.MOAW 0.340,1140
De1M1ed Ulagm 251,931 M9A0 05A1S 0S.7414 75.708 122,544 I20.733 ON 3A25 1.915,230 2A69.024
Proton'.plant and equipment,0WI:
Land WAN 1.110.117 IMSA12 2M.00 155.1110 2.0D1,650 418.7p9 40,641 4MAW - 7,140,1174 7.140.672
Bmvae...Il..11an Indiana 8,830.M1 101503.881 70087,328 341930.019 61731.1% 42.11 £0M007 NNN5 M,07,513 - 315.30,01 318,853a31
3ow.9oaaeuns,"doill 0.720.10 170.004,233 171.11013E 23,222.300 21A63A72 M,MM340 37,400,253 BApM000 14,S38,071F - 574.8all 513720.012
Sma0o disposal adopted 9.991.782 M2BB.9W 27.7114.185 3,1142.6M 3337.123 9.352=3 6.Mi.517 1,070,913 2275.516 - BQ004,215 S1AM.012
Generelplenlend
mminbm0ue Mcal5es Mill 22.702AM NATION 4,OH,60 3,7111.06 10M.147 6.404,617 4A54.794 3514,050 - 1Ma0,03 0.837,497
Cm.umanlnpmpma 10.902.110 29.984.73le 40.23090 0.921,142 9.890.047 12.204.18E 10281,18E 05,164 4711,610 IMMB.813 156.142.014
TOW prvpaM.Nanl
and aqulpmml 10d.650.686 DBO.MI,4M 352.941,011 74.9111 M,109.070 1M,471A91 80530,395 103M?65 W.445,72e - 1.221.424.595 1.117.IUAN
Leas w.umulebd deplatleX.n 36105A81 128,M. 90 IUMA13 21.470,200 12.70,820 47.946.182 21.857,BMt 3.60.181 12A0(1.750 417,805?4 378.2811553
Nalpmpe .plenlendeaulpmml W.7442M 231300AB0 225,1TM.1811 0.523,224 31AM.256 65."SADS 55.572.43E 0.649.OM 3Tp%= MA59,251 0WA43AB0
Eames pumNne pd.over
0o%I Wuameoweedemele 11A26.i53 11420.70 12JUS.AN
O6wr ovals,at dust,lass
acomulaldl amgrll2Mm S1A18 mm 2WM0 47AM am 10371 3MA91 2.220 4,721 109.20 2.921.047
Total asels $ WAIBAO S 3e9All $ 390.011D.178 S 0,079,170 5 82R10)03 S 127A10,297 S 110.783.539 S 24,419A0 S 0.738.08E S (3CO20,587) i 1.299.393.187 S 1.297.01.256
Icmlinued)
I [ [ I I I I I I L I I I I I I [ I I
OMNGE COUNTY SANITATION 015T
CeminOp 9N�Sheet(Con0nue0)
June]O Iw9
W lh CwnpveYw Tolela bl J ON W.18 W
Rewnw Me Revenue Ma Rew eMe Revenue Aron Revenue Ma Revenue Me Revenue Me Rewnw Me Revenueyea EIealk," 9
No.l Nag Ne.3 No.5 No.O Ne.] Na.tt Na.13 Na.12 E.M. tan IBW
Cu mIIBMIISee Neal.M1em
mml eeeW:
wA .pryeCle S 429.951 S I.M.nw 5 1.934A53 S 1.92e.M a 518.M a 467.918 S 244.e2e S I7.507 $ 1w,Bw S - E 8.998,452 3 5,593,M
�e.panaea MIND 848,107 812.I0 I06,31MI tw.]w 275.016 I0}31 32.I39 69,269 - 2.706.182 5,328.423
Due to OM.nwnw area. 10"897 2.083,222 3.3x1.192 1.041,3W 99a.8w 5.7W.419 I.M.2w 747.205 tba8.5w (31.020,50) -
MeI 2.213
Total cwen111eW15e.
pexWle at.wnenl
eum 11.517.M 4.251.798 611100,10 3,M2A20 11818.517 5A98,153 5,022,955 BZ]A51 1,700.533 (3t,028.5aD 91Tw,eN 10.021,929
Cumm111eb18 ea pgatee horn
roaMgM eawb:
RelenYonv peyable 137.147 WSW 72BA27 50.035 2a32N 151,0]8 (1 1e.7311 31,= - 2.2xQ285 2.457,571
lean tma0le 9w.7e0 1.047,125 1.479M1 211,13] 99.2103 215,58) MAN 917 5.M - 4.513.M 4710.251
DepaYN 41,57D 202.051 2091810 441114 38,025 159.555 310.539 I= 1,82e.685 - 2MM 1,81T.148
Qw..d)upmwla
Mabls.amenlpn08n 55.700 164,805 157,521 W.WB 22.20 WARM, 31.792 8.3w 13A50 - 525.428 129,003
Generol.b4nmbenM
MAIO.wmml peNeo 15.w0
C.NM.Ind WN nden
Nyabb,cumml peNan 1,Bw.33B n.381.35] 3.885.518 110.911 M.187 901.958 72D,231 SIM w.w3 12.880.0M 12.I05.0w
Taal umm111e HIM.
p 01.1.neMUM
mach. 2.525.795 G.N01215 04459A16 1,205A5e 923.031 11791,840 112e8,58B 31,81% 1,725,05 22.770.086 21.531.98
LOCNIp neblwe.:
COn. dIt0ebaanaea 3N.Bw +.01s.Tw e70.0a 1n.1w wx3w 33zxw 198.Sw 39A00 BZBw - 3)ai,WO 3.ws.500
C M.vN Iuwmenb pryBble,
nmlpoNOn U201 1Bn,t80 101,1w 10,BSB n2.910 W.wS w.B10 I1.N9 2e,010 - Me.. t001,b0
MlOapepryWb %90 1N.810 108.5)0 10.]N 2.810 9,3w qW0 - - - w35w
CaNAubaolpeNtlpNw .
pgeMe,nmumMpwllm.
net WBWew. 44.9,11,079 1+],980,0)0 112,38a,Bw 19,95T,w2 15.152,]19 34.541).455 22.512,626) 281.830 11658016 -wn 359,BS ]]3,0MAN
Dmenee nae n.eea 3x.iN WAS W.Iw
Tebl tom team llWllltle. 45A38R10 110,413.220 113.W,854 M131,801 15.538.025 25.023.931 23102333 332.415 !JW265 3WAIC230 376,MNI
T.llWllllles W.5R.231 130.525,239 120170."S W.Iw,73T 1S0)9,5]3 31=724 20401,877 1.191AW 5,Iw.BW 131.025,5871 30897,M 402NM
FUM epully:
C UMOAee®pIW 6.I53,713 W.M.3N VA18,2801 130w,700 5,510b24 1B?98w2 14.8W.M 9.171,983 7B,w3331 - 245,270.971 241.153.e00
RNelnW meeln9e
(..0 uleM88omJ.) 23.752.018 1901631,751 23B,w3N2 50,48).053 M,Sw,B90 70,811.571 WABDIM 14A55512 (17,4Q,183) w0,218R50 N7.102H
Total NM poly 29.aw.731 258.950.005 M.901,730 w.N8.133 II,1W,220 W,0w,5" 91,32+.882 23.227,6M 81,532175 w2.495.227 w0.M2.555
Ta4,III011me.and NM
eOMry S wA15.Ow S 389,01,33n S 3w.w0.178 S 09,870,170 S 6224,103 S IVAm,207 $ 90,783.530 S 21,419.09 S nMA2 S P1.02359T) S +,2Be,aW,lp S 1,207.561.250
29
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Charente in Featured!Eamin,
For th Year Ended June 30.1999
Wit Comperellve Tests for the Year Ended June 30,1998
Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area
No No.2 No.3 No No 6 No.1 No. 11 No.13 No, 14 19% 1990
Operi revenues,
Service clmrges E 6.561.226 S 21,424.524 $ 21.761.155 E 2,63g221 S 3,62Q402 S 5,810,848 S 4,156,386 $ 1,042,382 $ 519 $ 67,017.670 $ 55,%1.564
Permit and lnspeoll leas 43,010 219,844 48.745 2.910 5.863 59.09 12.124 210 18.764 410,947 329,272
Told l Operating revenues 61604.236 21.W.388 21,809,900 2,637,139 3,6U 265 5,070.317 4.168.512 1.042,597 19,283 67.428.617 58.290.835
Operating expenses other than
depredation and amodionlon:
Salaries and benefits 407.257 1.429,708 972.517 384,555 160.a8T 111) 2 517,359 7.579 62.442 4,611,246 4,131,704
Utilifies - 1,328 608 - - 322 107 - 535 2.900 434,568
Supplies 29 Soo 158 TO 40 5,222 no - - 6.392 91,213
Contractual sumoes 155,O77 550.459 397AU 93,628 52,921 161,437 91.845 9,241 25,953 1.531,193 1.168.556
Dlrect.a fees 3.613 11,266 28,981 2,000 3,233 8,547 1.167 2.452 8,930 24.169 91,606
Meetirga and training 150 1.435 2.657 117 145 335 54 121 702 5.617 6.357
Repairs and maintenance - - - 3,056 Ba - - - - 3.140 138,114
Joirloperefing expense
allocation.net 4,530.591 13.269.281 12,728,511 1,671,110 1,692,655 4.330.358 2,594,246 512.152 1.129.258 42,458,381 43,211.557
Other 42.402 183,861 118,OQ 15.8% 16,060 47,272 24,939 4,602 10.118 484,215 592,020
Total operating expenses
other than deprecia8on
and amadizalion 5.139,119 15,453844 14.248.991 2.170,399 1.926.805 5,380,4% 3,2 gam 53Q351 1,231,996 49.383.853 49.St 475
Oporatin Moores(lose)
Whose deprntctsfion
and amortization 1405,117 6,190,524 7.560.909 466.740 1.705.460 509,861 878.626 506.240 (1.218.113) 18.064.964 6.425,361
Daprsoistion on COMnbuted
lacililies - - - - - - - - - - 72,035
Depredation on other facilities 4,090.221 12,548,680 12,384.807 2,241.704 1,423.660 4,585.331 2,708,680 423,784 1.427,092 41.833,939 35.111,337
AnlodlSatlan of excess
purchase price over book
vatue on acquired assets 657,709 657,709 657,709
Operating Income(loss) (2,825.IN (6,358,156) (4,823.896) (1,274,964) 281.780 (4,075,470) (1,03Q03O 82,426 (3.303.514) (24,426.8841 (29,415.7211
(Continued)
r= r- r- r r- r r- r I- r- r-- r- U- r U- r- r- F-
t 1 I [ l 1 I I I I I I I I I I
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Combining Sentiment of Revenues.Expenses,and Changes In Retained Eamlrgs(ConBnued)
For the Year Ended June 30,INS
With Comparative Totals to,the Yee,Eread June 30,19911
Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Area Revenue Ares Revenue Area Revenue Area
NO No.2 No.3 No,5 No.6 No.7 No. It No.13 No.14 log large
Non-operating revenues'.
Property taxes 2.094,159 10.04.774 10,976,171 2.903.119 1.337,171 3,163,786 2,276,449 - - 32,835,028 31,287,109
lonso d 878,107 5.661,357 6,072,421 1,338,814 1,054,333 1,082,888 1.235.087 804,620 9,888 17,937.293 27.890.029
Other 74,080 210812 208719 27.324 26,120 68,694 45,438 7,911 1,391,651 2,060,759 2,124,182
Total non-operating
evemes 3,046,328 15,956,743 17.257,311 4,269,257 2,417,624 4,315,365 3,556 974 612.561 1,401,519 52,833.080 81,308,120
Noncperating expenses:
Interest 2,448,243 8,270,731 6.751,560 1,050,361 652.767 1,146.730 957,799 10,592 61,585 18,359,361 19,232,169
Other 73,160 415.538 432.561 215,094 62,575 229,180 120,504 2,363 84.541 1,656,144 1.329,596
Total nomopeeting
expenses 2,510A23 8.086,269 8,1B/,111 1,275,078 735.342 1,377,898 1.078.303 12,975 148,108 20,0t 5,S05 20.561,786
Nelincome gosq (2,098,201) 2,912,318 5,249.302 1,219.215 1,904,002 (1,138,003) 648.837 682,062 (2,048,101) 8,391,291 11,330.634
Add depredation and
amor94egon related
IOromdbuedequily - - 657709 657.709 729,745
Net In....(deaetise)
In retained earnings
(rooumuked de8dt) (2,098,2111) 2.912,318 6,240,002 1.219.215 1,064,062 (1,130,003) 616.637 662,062 (1,390,392) 9,049.000 12,060,379
Retained seminars
(eccumueted deaoi0,
beginning of year 25,850,219 198.719,433 219,634MO 49,241,43e 30,621,634 75,749.574 45,832,059 13,373,550 (16.052,7917 647,169,256 635.108,877
Retained earnings
(an umulatedde9o9),
e1M of year S 23,752,018 $199.631.751 S 226,083.02 3 50,480,1153 3 36,5115,698 S 74,611,571 $ 46,480.698 S 14,055,612 $(17.443,183) $ 656.218,255 3 647,169.2%
31
ORANGE COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICT
Combining Slelemenl of Cash Flows
For Me Year En0e6 June 30,1989
Wdh ComwlaOYe Tolels for%e Year En9a0 June 30,1NO
Rashness Me Nmmw Area 9menue Hee Nerenue Ama Revenue Ma Berme Me Pawn Ma Rewmre Me Neremn Me Etlminebq
No No,2 My less Noe No N0.11 No,13 Na 14 EMIn 'm INS
CeM any hem g .Iles agivilea'
Opaeli o. llmsl f I2.BM.tw1 1 16.358,1581 f p,B)Se9N i p,T)S,98a1 f M1,)ea f IT,m6g01 S I1.0M.03e1 f 81AM f 113w.5w1 S - S (3eeM.eael f (M.HS,]2q
Ad..0h to reca'tlb by(used
mmme Doss)
Io rrelwmprovaeE eY lusea Nlapmimc
Arnad.lion <,w0,2J1 12.510.680 13,381.807 3.201,IIN 1,02],BBO 4,565,331 x.Tp.6W <23.]61 1,I2],OB2 - e1,B33,939 35,1p3.3)3
Nnerr ryan-n 85],]09 - 667.709 w).)ea
ONaron-pendoesse ses )N,pM 210$13 31N.)19 10.3N 78.120 90.p91 L5,A16 ],wt 1.39?wl - 2.OW.)5B 2.121192
OlMrssIdecalinpwpemn (58,136) (3]8,3p8) (38].BN) (21o.)i8) 1]bw% (332.51]) (BB,J181 R.3<5) (w,313) - I1,6R,3581 (1,235.855)
Onveeu)aveeu m aaxty
ncraume rewmro 080.152) 13B.2d3 58,651 e65(1 20,3M (BSR>t) I16m2) 69] 36.35 x?689 9.8]].911
ouehameurernevuluemees - 35 (ua,3a1) - R.x28.m - (1,Si6.3591 aB95,81e
Oth hr...rporonmenlM apenoss 11.08 1?390 3;9t6 <.335 1,w6 6,Doe 1;W3 2W 16).<W - 2307 3,012.319
Olhry.bae adas Bs) vem) M,06m 12.251) M.a)91 6m MB 2 e - 3,65) (724.088)
I hba iee (33.)25) (22e.359) 05O.N0]) (12.z51) (2z,5]51 (50.18) IO,NB (8.201) 20.OSB - (Q3.813) 6,636
Repaberd.ratol N 100.m Isubw1 (15o.80z) I19.Sw1 12?8ael 102.12]I IMUD ..wel (102ez) - .911.7. I1e9.5671
O6seay.mandmn Aces, n '1W,820 550,519 561,844 71,137 1w.W1 M8,151 130.530 30.e91 91.1)0 - 1.811,)K 1609.YW1
Inwem 18pnsa)m bdlube.
rmimb pryeeb MSIM) (Seem xx,B3e ?892,512 3yo.", 08.89]I (xa0.n3) hx.]a5) p0.w81 - La5.1m (2.]81588)
I1mu0es pries (236,]511 040.o32) (]lem3) M.523) (w.9J11 1250,1601 (302.823) 1(016") 1M."06) - 13.318.741l 293.179
Repot. mNe (BB,BBi) (ta8,831) Ial868 (32.]3% 1B),080 92.85) (87.367) (B,6]31 fnes81 - (02.07 ]w.ae8
Metob 1%454.4% 28.875 x8,&d 3p% 3.)32 92.139 S'ISSem ?m 831,8(1 - B113.i8] I1,Iw.1151
omwakMrmvausuws 101944 1.838Run t.la]IBM 1103,8W1 - 0.'BMI I118.IN, IA.bJ (1) P.a86M% -
OngoeharM Izae) lead 10]31 1001 m 1nO 11501 IMI In) 12,2131 ;213
Cwnperede6easeum 6100 12.M 69,8W 0.100 30.900 (13,M% 62W I'm 3.Bm t)2,ZW 2560w
CYMe erlpllrepmanla peyWb IB13) 12.T1 1].083 9M 1].900 19.708I 1]KI 1.8]0 159, 31.308 IBML]%
NNeaMpavbeEb/(uNE
lw)oeaelbnm Lima" 7,211.312 13.e92.6w1 1.8e405e 3.me.3w 101%610 I19m2361 slew 1]491W) 19TY1961 N,M5.021
Cash Kvs from mnuptell eirp mNnfps:
ROwMhmn pr lY bses 2.094159 10.081."41 10.916,171 ;901119 1A3).1)1 3.161785 ;376,409 33.839.626 31,2e7,1CB
LWBoyshml ohya rMNeE
0nennM aeln diM:
AEiONvnlo ipmeM (<.w3.2K) (1;310.BSn ( .8M,12B) IeA161e8) (4,512,561) . .250) M;0 (]5],5)6) 1,3931 N .]O9,.a931
IdaedpebL.Waa-ra..D.Ip RAt).1 % R. 0,w ) 11,OS0]B11 (652. 1 0154. IM,60% (10,52% (01tm) (1%474,8 ) 8811
pmipelpymaeaemalbaof .nNpemn 1? e.o1 l4.099.) % 0.sma.8M1 law.usl (N];8t6) (NOW Iw3,58% 0.t0% lae.00% 01.m81
Rmlpel sil�aa (15, 4 - 15.00(1)
RacwES I-caDel
r'onUAulpns 252.9N 46eA.4M 28N.251 163.421 3W.]BB Mx.Yr1 ]82.]M ?x)1 B3] 13661E091 flM59B5 2550021
Not."iEW Ey lueM laB
opldeMrelay"fnurc'egassamue 1]7010)1 118667.3181 01973R51 ROM.,1 1<sos.1T an31M 1602.ew1 4B50)3 06295151 1®.M1411 fm U6WS
Cash Ibee Irom iMMeq Wivi mys:
%ooaCs tmnlM vab durweMeNs 36.910.2w 292.m.BM SI4,92B.181 71,Bt1,B80 55,556,802 ea,3]0.)59 62.216.750 b,YilwB 17,986.919 - W7.M6I6 1.727.641.173
Ivnws.sd inmstmeme I37,90aA5% IM0.09).5M) (M.371.71% (M,9e9,5W1 IS6.M9.66B1 (69A82.093) (65.25S66% CM37bw7) 115.183.4941 - (1.005.536423) 11)55.107.0091
Iran®,rMivq I0N.100 5.058.655 0.aM,8B2 1,3W,553 1.007.567 1.ffi.957 1.355.665 O'Dw gum 19.261.OM 27357.118
Ndwnpe.itleagWeeelml
6M4sp mdiveee MI.M1 110156.0e01 18943 IM1.tb1 9N.311 2= I1676a 11W9.w4I 2JIN I 11919m.]1)1 IM6.3561
Nn immwe(eevawe)m
oMaM osh pwrekMe (4A54.62C) (11,522,2Y1) (10.018.31% (2.0I3W) (1,SN.3Ot) (2,A 0761 I1.9)4.630) 1?Y!B (4T 231) (35.306249) (30132.169)
LYhtlq UnepMekMe.6p1"alYBV 58171M UOD&W 21164.7ea JOINT INS. 4HIJI95 4318 ?1$rn 1017M 714?YB 10319mo5]
LeM uM nMRe-p-weMds,eMWyaer S 1.M3.581 f IIA)).617 f IUIO410 f 2.01.100 f ;021.079 f 2,495.019 f 2.3 916 f 1.182.M9 S U5.405 3 - f 350 09 f ]i.L81.0M
OCSD
Statistical Section
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
r
r
r
' o
a+
u
d
N
i0
Y
Y
� f/1
l0
Y
H
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Expenses by Type
(Dollars in Thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Sim.=
$90,000
$80.000
$70,000
Most],
$50,000
S40,000
$30,000
$20.000
S10,000
1999.90 199691 1991-92 1992-93 199094 1994-95 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99
/Opemorg Expense ONon Opemft E"nse
Operating(1) Non-Operating
Personal Maint& DeprB Total Interest Total
Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Operating Expense Other Non-Oper.
1989-90 $ 19.170 $ 5,578 $ 19,224 $ 17.726 $ 61,698 $ 9,368 $ 1.048 $ 10,416
1990-91 24.170 5,483 20,711 23.520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476
1991-92 26,757 5,920 20,416 23,346 76.439 11,825 2,405 14,230
1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27.950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049
1993-94 28.886 4,589 21,599 33,988 89,062 16.964 2,414 19.378
1994-95 29.399 3,180 27.369 34,087 94.035 23.941 826 24,767
1995.96 32.660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20,731 7.648 28.379
1996-97 31,523 3.744 22,851 35,284 93,402 21.237 1,497 22.734
1997-98 28,725 3.328 22,526 35,841 90,420 19,232 1.330 20.562
1998-99 28.809 3.320 20,960 42,492 95,581 18,359 1,656 20,015
(1)-The individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses,which,for the last seven
_ fiscal years,were as follows:
Personal MalntB DeprB Total
Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Operating
1992-93 $ 24,660 $ 6,740 $ 18,923 $ - $ 50.323
1993-94 24,715 4,042 18.870 - 47,627
1994-95 25,861 2,630 22.791 - 51,282
1995-96 27,410 2,392 22,247 - 52.049
1996.97 27,194 3,073 20.339 - 50,6D6
1997-98 24,594 2,893 20.438 - 47.925
1998-99 23.998 3,317 18,869 - 46,184
Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division.
33
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT �r
Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source
(Dollars in Thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years ..
Smoot)
r
$90.000
$75,000
$60000
$45.000 -
P.
$30,0DD
$15,000
$-
1989-90 1990-91 INI-92 1992-93 1993-91 199,195 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99
■Operating Revenue ■Non-Operating Revenue ■Conldbute Capital
Operating Revenue Non-Operating Revenue
Permit 8 Federal 8 Net
Service Inspection Property Capacity State Contributed
Fiscal Year Charge(1) Fees Taxes Rights Interest Grants Other(1) Capital
1989-90 $ 23,009 $ 1,241 $ 31.122 $ 1,242 $ 18.993 $ 2,070 $ 1,887 $ 94,132
199D-91 39.712 7,429 33,395 1.172 17.279 64 3,496 15,683
1991-92 56,155 322 34,053 1,815 22,593 2,053 5,499 12,898
1992-93 71,568 456 31.054 2.228 27,569 18 3,419 9,486 L.
1993-94 73,400 540 35.854 - 33,226 - 8,751 13,471
1994-95 72.909 240 27,286 - 18,500 204 4.204 21.431
1995-96 71,362 120 29,285 - 20,209 - 4,224 4,209
1996-97 64,923 258 28,193 - 20,958 - 3.390 21.830
1997-98 59,517 329 31,287 - 27,897 - 3,283 4,785
1998-99 69,453 411 32,836 - 17,937 - 3,352 5.124
(1}The individual revenue components include a breakdown of the joint operating revenues,which,for the last
seven fiscal years,were as follows:
Operating Non- _
Revenue Operating
Service Revenue .,.
Charge Other
1992-93 $ 1.999 $ 1.740
1993-94 2.492 2.301
1994-95 2.617 2.032
1995-96 3.034 1,156
1996-97 2.652 1.023
1997-98 3,555 1,159
1998-99 2,435 1,291
Source:Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division.
34
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections
(Dollars In Thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
ase $100.000
!�
$90,000 �1r
$BO,OIq
$70,M
$60.000
$50.000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
1989-90 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
OTolal Tax and User Fee Levy ■Total Tax and User Fee Collection
Current Total Tax %of
Total Tax Tax and Percent of and User %of Total O/S Delinquen-
and User User Fee Levy Delinquent Fee Collection Delinquen- ties to Tax
Fiscal Year Fee Levy Collection Collected Collection Collection to Levy ties Levy
1989-90 $ 47.900 $ 45,024 94.00% $ 729 $ 45.753 95.52% $ 2,532 5.29 %
1990-91 72,180 68,841 95.37 845 69,686 96.54 2,774 3.84
1991-92 85,172 79,329 93.14 1.637 80,966 95.06 5,067 5.95
1992-93 92,926 86,511 93.10 2,152 88,663 95.41 5.465 5.88
1993-94 92,728 88,335 95.26 5,722 94,057 101.43 3,255 351
1994-95 91,562 86,294 94.25 2,239 88,533 96.69 2,942 3.21
1995-96 91,844 90.479 98.51 586 91,065 99.15 1,710 1.86
_ 1996-97 89,794 82.123 91.46 246 82,369 91.73 2,191 2.44
1997-98 90,953 78.881 86.71 12 78,873 86.72 3,039 3.34
1998-99 98,557 92,089 93.44 1,597 93,686 95.06 2,069 2.10
Source:Orange County Auditor-Controller's Of0ce.
35
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property
(Dollars in Millions)
Last Ten Fiscal Years r
140,000
120,000
100,000
r
80.000
00,000
40,000 -
20,000
1989.90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 199596 1996-97 1997-98 1998-N
■Se..d Property Assessed Value OUrsewred Property Assessed Value ..
Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals
Estimated Estimated Estimated Ratio of Total
Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed to
Fiscal Year Value Value Value Value Value Value EstimateclValue
1989-90 $ 98,750 $ 98,750 $ 4.422 $ 4.422 $ 103,172 $ 103,172 100%
r
1990-91 109.048 109,048 3,575 3,575 112,623 112,623 100
1991-92 116,450 116.450 4,473 4,473 120,923 120,923 100
r
1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,887 4,687 127,197 127,197 100
1993-94 124,016 124.016 3.963 3,963 127,979 127.979 100
1994-95 123,525 123,525 3,871 3,871 127,396 127,396 100 r
1995-96 122,524 122,524 3.372 3.372 125,896 125,896 100
1996-97 122,304 122,304 3.247 3,247 125,561 125,551 100 r
1997-98 125,018 125,018 3,302 3.302 128,320 128.320 100
1998-99 131,295 131.295 3,394 3,394 134,689 134.689 100
r
Source:Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office.
36
r
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments
r (per$100 of asessed value)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
r
r
Fiscal Year IM-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993.94 199445 199698 1999-97 1997-98 1998-99
Basic 1%Levy 1'00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000
.a Orange County No. 1
Bond 15R Fund-1951 0.00024 - - - - - - - - -
Orange County No.3
Bond MR Fund-1951 0.00039 - - - - - - - -
Orange County No.5
,r Bond 13R Fund-1951 0.00041 - - - - - - - -
Orange County No.5
Bond ISR Fund-1951 - - - - - - - - - -
r
Orange County No.11
Bond ISR Fund-1951 0.00008 - - - - - - - -
Bond 18R Fund-1958 0.00021 0.00015 0,013012 0.00013 0.00019 0.00019 0 OOD19 0.00010 0.00010 0.00020
Total 1.00133 1.00015 1.00012 1.00013 1.00019 I M019 1.00018 1.00010 I M010 1.0002D
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Source:County of Orange Auditor-Controllers Office.
r 37
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Principal Users
For the Year Ended June 30, 1999
r
Dean Foods
Knolls eeM 15% Kimberly Clerk
Farm .16% .75%
Sundor .16%
Rockwell .19%
AERA Energy
.21% Adohr Farms _
Disneyland .52%
.28%
Favorite Foods
.30% MCP Foods
.42%
Percentages of
Total Service
User Service Chimes Charge Revenues
Kimberly Clark $ 518,458 0.75% r,
Adohr Farms 358,870 0.52%
MCP Foods 291.377 0.42%
i.
Favorite Foods 208,902 0.30%
Disneyland 193,851 0.28%
AERA Energy 144,871 0.21%
Rockwell 134,148 0.19%
Sundor Brands 110.108 0.16% "
Knotts Berry Farm Foods 109.216 0.16%
Dean Foods 100,716 0.15%
r
$ 2,170,517 3.14%
fJ
r
r
Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division.
38
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Ratio of Annual Debt Service
for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses
Last Ten Fiscal Years
70.0%
eo.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0% AM
20.0% MEN
10.0%
0.0% x_
1999490 19 91 1991.92 1992.90 199194 1994.95 199596 1995-97 1997-9a 199a.99
Ddlan In Tnnusands
Total Operating
Expenses Ratio of Debt Service
Total Debt Exclusive of to Total Operating
Fiscal Year Principal Interest Service Depr.d Amort Expenses
1989-90 $ 2.593 $ 9,368 $ 11,961 $ 43,972 27.20%
1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50,363 23.93
1991-92 3,335 11.825 15,160 53,091 28.55
1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04
1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59
1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 55,298 63.49
199596 10,180 21,298 31,478 57,561 54.69
1996-97 10,680 20,463 31,143 54.443 57.20
1997-98 11,320 20,008 31,328 49,865 62.83
1998-99 12,120 18,475 30,595 49,364 61.98
Source:Orange County Sanitation Distdcfs Accounting Division.
39
led
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
June 30, 1999 L
1998-99 Amassed Valuation(Land B Improvements Only): $123,159,446,707(after deducting$11.529,481,052 redevelopment
incremental valuation) I
Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt (Based on redevelopment adjusted all property assessed valuation of$129,687,234,736): V
%Applicable Debt 6130M
Orange County Teeter Plan Obligations 74.57D% $ 97,183,353
Metropolitan Water District of Southern Calitoms 15.198 87,849,759 L
Irvine and Saddleback Valley Unified School Districts 99.975&11.248 1,497.753
Buena Park and Centralia School Districts 100. 7,367,978
City of Anaheim 99.051 8.766.014
City of Irvine 100. 3.430.000
Other Cities Various 1227,025
Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement Districts Various 299.938.492
Water Districts 93.776-100. 12,664.540
Yorba Linda Library District 95.525 28,958
Orange County Assessment Districts 100. 140.857.212
City of Irvine 1915 Act Bonds 100. 596,130,D00
City of Tustin 1915 Ad Bonds 100. 72.885,000
Other City 1915 Ad bonds Various 33,892,000 I I
Bonita Canyon Community Facilities Dutrd No.98-1 100. 45,000,000 LI
Irvine Unified School District Community Facilities Distinct No.86.1 99.996 114,380,425
Orange County Community Facilities District No.874 99.BW 79.732,434
City of Placentia Community Facilities District No.89-1 100. 26,845,000 Other Community Facilities Districts Various 153,701,990 L
Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt $1,783,357,933
Direct and Overlapping Other Debt: %Applicable Debt 6GO/99
Orange County General Fund Obligations 74.570% $ 1313,8 22.506
Orange County Pension Obligations 74.570 232.153.864
Orange County Transit District Authority 74.570 10,808,922
Coast Community College District Certificates of Participation 99.051 17,160,128
South Orange County Community College District Certificates of Participation 34.210 16,345,538 I
Brea-Olinda Unified School District Certificates of Participation 97.767 33,338,547 L
Santa Ana Unified School District Certificates of Participation 100. 25,607,830
Orange Unified School District Certificates of Participation 96.211 11,425.056
Other School District Certificates of Participation Various 25,262,912 I
City of Anaheim General Fund Obligations 99.051 725,756,138 L
City of Fullerton General Fund Obligations 100. 45,044,880
City of Huntington Beach General Fund Obligations 99.981 47,848.913
City of Irvine General Fund Obligations 100. 72.115000
City of Santa Ana General Fund Obligations 100. 149,526:707
Other City General Fund Obligations Various 149.546,822
Orange County Sanitation District Certificates of Participation 100. 374,135,000
Irvine Ranch Water District Certificates of Participation 98.607 56699025 ,
Orange County Water District Certificates of Participation 99.227 187:841:672 I
Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Facilities Corporation 72.051 49,794,446 L
Other Special District Certificates of Participation 100. 2,900,13
Total Direct and Overlapping Other Debt $3,047,163,906
Less: Orange County Transit District Authority(60%self-suppomng) 8,647,137
Canis County Water District Certificates of Participation(100%self-supporting) 187,841,672 u
City of Anaheim self-supporting obligations 677.168,152
Other City self-supporting obligations 3.144.599
MWDOC Water FaciRss Corporation(100'/e self-supporting) 49.794,446 j
Total Net Direct and Overlapping Other Debt S2,120,567,800 Lr
Gross Combined Total Debt $4,630,651.839(1)
Net Combined Total Debt $3,903.955,733
(1) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes,revenue,mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and iron-bonded capital New obligatioro. 1
Ratios to: Land and Improvement All Property L
Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation
Total Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt 1.32% N/A
Combined Direct Debt ($374,135,000) 0.30% 0.29% U
Gross Combined Total Debt 3.92% 3.72%
Net Combined Total Debt 3.17% 3.01%
STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 650/99: $31.841,161
Source: Calffomia Municipal Statistics.
40 L'
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Bond Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years
5.00
A
/.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
5o
00
0.50
0.00
Dollars in Thousands
0 1989 W Ill ■1991-92 01992-93 ■1993-M
0199495 ■l 0199697 01997-98 D199899
Direct Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements
Gross Operating Avail.For
Fiscal Year Revenue(l) Expenses(2) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage(3)
1989-90 $ 79.563 $ 43,972 $ 35,591 $ 2.593 $ 9.368 $ 11.961 2.98
1990.91 102.548 50,363 52,185 2.396 9.654 12.050 4.33
1991-92 122,489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11,825 15,160 4.58
_ 1992-93 132,573 54,096 78,477 6,075 11.799 17,874 4.39
1993-94 146,979 50.280 96.699 11.990 16.964 28,954 3.34
1994-95 118.695 55,298 63,397 9.670 25.439 35.109 1.81
1995-96 12l.010 57,561 63,449 10.180 21.298 31.478 2.02
1996-97 114.046 54,443 59.603 10,680 20,463 31.143 1.91
1997-98 117,599 49,865 67,734 11.320 20,008 31,328 2.16
1998-99 120,262 49.364 70.898 12,120 18,475 30.595 2.32
(1)-Including non-opere8ng revenues.
as (2)-Exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
(3)-Coverage requirements per the certificate of participation indenture agreements range
from 1.0 to 1.25. The coverage rate has stabilized around 2.0 for the last four years.
It is the Districts policy to be in compliance with all bond covenants,and the District
has the ability to raise user fees by a vole of the Board of Directors.
Source:Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division.
41
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Demogmhic Statistics
Covering The Entire County of Orange(1)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
L
(4) (2) (3)
Population Median (2) Public School (2) L
Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment
Year (In Thousands) Income Age (In Thousands) Rate
1989-90 2.325 $ 53,000 33.2 365 2.9% L
1990-91 2,411 56,380 30.4 385 4.8%
1991-92 2.512 56,346 30.4 393 4.8% 1
1992-93 2.557 54,380 30A 400 6 7% V
1993-94 2,697 54.413 32.6 402 5.8%
1994-95 2.641 55,507 32.9 412 5.5% I
1995-96 2,624 57,106 31.9 422 4.2% L.I
1996-97 2.632 59,629 32.2 443 3.5%
1997-98 2,615 60,000 30.4 458 4.2% I ';
1998-99 Z776 61,812 31.8 471 2.8% irk
L
L
1
V
L
Notes and Data Sources: L
(1)- The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59%of the total 799 square miles
that make up the boundries of the County of Orange.
(2)- Data Source-Center for Demographic Research,Califomia State University, Fullerton.
(3)- Data Source-Orange County Department of Education.
(4)- Data Source-Demographic Research Unit,Calrfomia Department of Finance.
L
L
L
L
42
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Property Value and Construction
Covering The Entire County of Orange(1)
(Dollars In Thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
v
Non-
Assessed Residential Residential
_. Property Value(2) Constr.(3) Construction(3) Total
Fiscal Calendar No.of Construction
Year Value Year Value Units Value Value(3)
1989-90 $ 141,941,723 1990 $ 1,172,651 11,976 $ 1,392,217 $ 2,564,868
r 1990-91 158,342,197 1991 797,489 6,569 1,089,116 1,886,585
1991-92 170,151,136 1992 567,121 5,943 1,032,196 1,599,317
1992-93 178,534,134 1993 496,724 6,410 1.083,716 1,580,440
r 1993-94 178,761,413 1994 560,558 12,644 1.745,301 2,305,859
1994-95 176,974,944 1995 582,712 8,300 1,295,297 1,878,009
1995-96 172,508,373 1996 760,809 10,207 1.528,835 2,289,644
r 1996-97 177,300,663 1997 1,079,687 12,251 2,007,084 3,086,771
1997-98 182,294,316 1998 1,529,491 10,050 1,852,552 3,382,043
1998-99 192.625,739 1999 1,796.024 12,991 2,313,189 4,109,213
r
r
r
,r Notes and Data Sources:
(1)- The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59%of the total 799 square
r miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange.
(2)- Orange County Auditor-Controller.
- - (3)- 'The Chapman University Economic&Business Review". All 1999 amounts are forecasts.
r
r
r
r
V
r
43
L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas
Served by the Orange County Sanitation District L
June 30, 1999
L
Population
as of
City January 1,1999 L
Anaheim 306,300
Brea 36,400
Buena Park 75,900 u
Costa Mesa 105,600
Cypress 48,500 11
Fountain Valley 56,400 U
Fullerton 126.800
Garden Grove 156,500 L'Huntington Beach 196,700
Irvine 136,600
La Habra 55,800
La Palma 16,400 L
Los Alamitos 12,050
Newport Beach 74,000
Orange 127,600 L
Placentia 49,160
Santa Ana 315,000
Seal Beach 27,200
Stanton 33,850
Tustin 66,800
Villa Park 8,625
Wesuninister 88,200 6d
Yorba Linda 61,800
23 Cities Subtotal 2,176,175 L
Unincorporated County Areas 208,200
Total 2,386,375 j
L
L
L
L
Source: Demographic Research Unit,California Department Of Finance. L
44 L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Insurance in Force
rr As of June 30, 1999
�I
Type Insurer Deductible Limit
All-Risk PnopeM Fifteen Carders
Fire and Flood $25,000 $300 Million per occurrence.
Earthquake Greater of 5%per $65 Million per occun since.
,r unit or$100,000
Boiler& Machinery The Hartford Insurance Co. $25,000 to $100 Million per occurrence.
r $100.000
Employee Dishonesty/
Faithful Performance The Hartford Insurance Co. $5.000 $1 Million per loss.
u
Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/
Faithful Performance
General Liability Self-Insured
r Excess
General Liability Sable Insurance Co. $100.000 $25 Million per occurrence
Travel&Accident The Hartford Insurance Co. -0- $100,000 per person;
$500,000 aggregate for any
one accident.
Workers'
r Compensation Self-Insured
r Excess Workers'
Compensation Reliance National Indemnity Co. $250.000 Statutory coverage for each
Each Accident accidentleach employee.
Y�
r
Source'. Orange County Sanitation District's Risk Management Office.
45
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated
With Expenses by Type INI
(Dollars in Thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
L
Millions of
Gallons of
Wastewater
Treated Total
Fiscal Per Personal Malnt Depr.& Total Interest Non- Total
Year Day Services UUIIWs &Other Amon- Operating Expense Other Operating Expenses
1989-90 .26& $ 19.170 $5.678 $19,224 $17,728 $61.698 11 9.368 $1.048 $ 10,416 $ 72,114
;.M�i flin
1990-91 24,170 5.483 20,711 23.520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 85,360
u
1991-92 26,757 5,920 20.416 23,348 76,439 11.825 2,405 14,230 90,669
1992-93 "t+• 28,924 7.235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11.799 1,260 13,049 98,835 I
4
c. Li
1993-94 ,y�'J,3 26,886 4,589 21,599 33,988 89,082 18,960 2,414 19,378 108,140
,t:e✓iid. 1
199495 ;�' 29,399 3,180 27,389 34,O87 94,036 23,8/1 an24,787 118,802 L
1995-98 + 32,660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20.731 7,648 28,379 124,132
1996-97 r 31,523 3,744 22.851 35.264 93,402 21,237 1,497 22,734 116,136 !
M1ti,r u
� n
1997-96 ."! 28,725 3,326 22,528 35,841 90,420 19,232 1,330 20,682 110,982
1998-99 124. 28,809 3,320 20,980 42,492 88,881 18,359 1,658 20,016 116,688 L
II
In 1989,the Districts completed a 30 year master plan which projected wastewater treatment flows to Increase from 275 millions of V
gallons Dar day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mgd in 1995 and out to 400 mgd in the year 2020. In order to manage the Increase in
wastewater flows,the Districts initiated a$1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan with projected debt financing costs of$1.2 billion
and future operating and maintenance costs,"eluding depreciation,of$62 million annually.
Total expenses have Increased$43.5 million,or 60.3 percent,since 1989-90 primarily as a result of the expected increases in
wastewater flows. Of this increase,depreciation expense represented 57.0 percent and debt service interest represented another
20.7 percent as a result of the capital facilities expansion that has been completed. j
As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment flows had a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to r
a ten year low of 227 mgd in 1991-92 and have since increased to 241 mgd in 1998-99. I
The sudden drop in 1991-92 influent Is attributable to a combination of factors including: U
-the state-wide recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County,but caused a
migration of existing commercial and Industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupancies.
-the So.California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes In water usage habits. u
The District has performed a master plan update to ensure that future plant capacity will match the future needs of the residents of
Orange County.
L
Source:Orange County Sanitation District.
46 L
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Biosolids Produced
Last Ten Fiscal Years
50,000
45.000
40.000
35.000
30,000
4
25,000
20,000
■1989-90 019W91 ❑INN-92 01992-93 01993-91
019N 95 ■1995 N 019%97 ■1997-98 M 1998 99
_ Fiscal Year Tonnaoe
1989-90 48.439
1990-91 44,968
1991-92 43,464
1992-93 41.964
1993-94 39.650
1994-95 40,228
1995.96 38,802
1996.97 39.387
1997-98 42,645
1998-99 41,023
Source:Orange County Sanitation District.
47
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Miscellaneous Statistics V
June 30, 1999
District Organization: 1 Consolidated District servicing 23 plies, unincorporated areas,
and three special districts as follows: y
Revenue Area No. 1 Revenue Area No.3 Revenue Area No.7
County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange
Cities: Cities: Cities: trrl
Orange Anaheim Irvine
Santa Ana Brea Orange I �
Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana y
Special Districts: Cypress Tustin
Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts:
District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary
Garden Grove District I.I
Huntington Beach
La Habra `
La Palma Revenue Area No. 11 u
Los Alamitos County of Orange
Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach 1
Seal Beach
Revenue Area No.2 Stanton Revenue Area No. 73
County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange
Cities: Midway City Sanitary Cities:
Anaheim District Brea �I
Brea Orange
Fountain Valley Revenue Area No.5 Yorba Unda
Fullerton County of Orange L
Garden Grove City of Newport Beach
Le Habra Revenue Area No. 14
Orange County of Orange
Placentia Revenue Area No.6 Cities:
Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine
Villa Park Cities: Orange I
Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin
Special Districts: Special Districts:
Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Ranch Water
District District
Governing Body: 29 member Board of Directors.
Staff: 518.5 authorized full-time equivalent employees. L
Operational Date: July 1, 1954.
Authority: California Health 8 Safety Code Section 4700 at.seq.
YV
Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal.
Service Area: 471 square miles.
Population Served: 2,386,375
Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtrunk sewers-650 miles F
Number of pumping stations-22
Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 89 million of gallons per day I.I
Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 152 million of gallons per day
Total 241 million of gallons per day
Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. lL
48 Yr
Orange County Sanitation District
Finance Department
Accounting Division
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
o(SD 10/99
FINANCIAL &
OPERATIONAL
REPORT
• F'
moil
a It
First Quarter -~
Ended
September 30, 1999
A
� f
2§. 41j
PAP
6 ryE PPP
Orange County Sanitation District, California
Table of Contents
r Section 1 - Overview........................................................................................................1
r Financial Report-
Section 2 -Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge............................................................2
Comparisonof Expenses by Department...................................................................3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category.................................................................4
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item.................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process ...........................................................8
Chart of Staffing Trends .............................................................................................9
r
Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Review
r
Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Current Year..........2
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life.............7
Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Area
.r
Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas ........................................................1
Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2
r Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3
Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review..........................................................................4
Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5
Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6
Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7
Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8
RevenueArea No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9
Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10
r
Section 5 - Self Insurance Budget Review
.. General Liability Fund Budget Review .......................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review...........................................................2
r Operational Report
Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1
r
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report
u
l�
L'
U
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
L
ll
L.i
J
L
'L
y
i
L
r
Overview
r
First Quarter Financial & Operational Report
r September 30, 1999
r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1999-00 first quarter comprehensive
financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational
accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the
general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District,
reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis
on the status of each Division's 1999-00 performance objectives as established in the
1999-00 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is
provided below.
r Joint Operating& Working Capital Budget Review. At September 30, 1999, 27.29
percent, or$12,009,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has
been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 14.94 percent, or$1,561,000 from
r the same period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1999 is $544.26 based on flows of
.+ 22,065 million gallons, or 239.84 million gallons per day. This is $62.02, or 12.86
percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due in
part to expenditures being slightly high at 27.29 percent, but mostly due to the shortfall
r in flows which are 4.06 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per
day.
r Included within the costs of Joint Operating is the cost of the Huntington Beach Closure
Project totaling $750,800. Without these costs, total net joint operating expense would
be $11,258,000, or 25.58 percent of budget, and the total cost per million gallons would
be $510.23 or 5.80 percent above budget.
r
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of September 30, 1999 include:
• Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 26.62
percent of budget through the first quarter while staffing was 21 full-time equivalents
(FTE's), or 4.0 percent below the total 519 FTE's approved in the 1999-00 budget.
Personnel costs were high in the first quarter due to (1) the distribution of annual
bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2) the early
.. retirement and associated accrual payoff for several employees, and (3) overtime
costs associated with the Huntington Beach Closure Project. Net joint operating
personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year-end.
• Retirement—First quarter expenses for retirement are at 32.73 percent, or$634,400
r of the $1,938,600 budget due to the fact that bonuses, benefit option plan
payments, and leave payoffs are now subject to the Orange County Employees'
Section 1 - Page 1
r
L
1999-00 First Quarter Review
Retirement System employer and employee contributions. This was not taken into
consideration at the time the budget was submitted for retirement expenses.
t ,
• Memberships—At the end of the first quarter, membership expense totaled
$80,525, or 44.22 percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a
majority of the District's memberships are due in the first quarter. L
• Notices& Ads— First quarter expenses for notices and ads were at 46.14 percent,
or$10,889 of the 1999-00 budget of$23,600 due to searches to fill several vacant it
positions.
• Lab Chemicals & Supplies- At the end of the first quarter, lab chemical and LI
supplies costs totaled $170,100, or 47.72 percent of the $356,400 budget. These
costs are high because of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the
months of July and August due to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. y
• Groundskeeping & Janitorial—At the end of the first quarter, groundskeeping and
janitorial costs totaled $487,400, or 33.36 percent of budget due to one-time annual Li
costs of$17,150 in tree pruning and $2,570 in weed abatement. I f
• Contractual Services— Other—First quarter expenses for other contractual services u
were at 38.70 percent, or$469,100 of the $1,212,300 budget. This high cost is a
result of engineering/consulting costs of$309,000 which have been charged to the
Huntington Beach Closure Project. LI
• Legal—At the end of the first quarter, legal expenses totaled $125,300, or 32.12 LJ
percent of budget primarily due to the unanticipated costs of $45,700 associated
with the legal issues surrounding the use of biosolids in Kern County.
• Professional Services—Audit & Accounting— First quarter expenses of $32,800 are
V
at 70.03 percent of the $46,800 budget due to the timing of the District's annual
financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year.
• Natural Gas—At the end of the first quarter, natural gas expense totaled $319,900,
or 30.93 percent of budget due to a combination of an increase in the cost per unit
of usage, accounting for approximately$16,500, and an increase in the actual units
of natural gas consumed, accounting for approximately$37,200.
• Power— First quarter expenses for electricity are at 28.62 percent of the $1,411,400 LI
budget primarily due to the increase in the cost per unit.
L�
• AQMD Operating Fees— First quarter expenses for AQMD operating fees are at
43.12 percent of the $142,000 budget due to the timing of when AQMD requires
payments. Semi-annual fees are due during the first and third quarters each fiscal
year.
u
Section 1 - Page 2
V
Overview
• Other Non-Operating Expenses —At the end of the first quarter, other non-operating
expenses totaled $18,700, or 39.37 percent of budget primarily due to a one-time
payment of $10,000 to the State Water Resources Control Board for the July 21,
1998 discharge of sewage into the Newport Bay.
Comparison of First Quarter Results with Year-End Actuals (Budget)
Last Five Years
sso
we.0 agxu
Sao �as.>s
a5g
nzn
am
3M
2.e`ffi M-97 2LA 2" UM
1st Year 1st Year let Year at Year 1st MrU.1
Ott end oar am otr etw Car etw oar Budget
As demonstrated in the graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the first quarter
has been somewhat lower than at year-end for each of the last four years. The 1999-
00 first quarter is higher than compared to the annual budget due to lower than
anticipated flows and to higher costs, mainly a result of the Huntington Beach Closure
Project.
The District budgeted $440,000 for the reappropriation of fiscal year 1998-99 funds in
the current year. Of those funds $157,500 was used for reappropriation, and the
balance of $282,500 was incorporated into the general manager's contingency account.
The general manager's contingency account was originally budgeted at $203,100 for
fiscal year 1999-00. To date, $73,200 has been applied towards the rental of the
financial information computer system, since this capital project was closed out at
August 31, 1999. This leaves a remaining balance in the general managers
contingency account of $412,400.
Section 1 - Page 3
1999-00 First Quarter Review r
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution ..
towards the gallonage charge through the first quarter 1999-00, as budgeted for 1999-
00, and as actually incurred through the first quarter 1998-99. All three charts are quite
similar showing little change among the current year first quarter actual, current year r
budget, and prior year first quarter actual.
More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 r
provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the first quarter
for the last five years; Section 2— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by
department for September 30, 1997, 1998, and 1999; Section 2— Page 4 provides a ..
summary of expenses by major category through September 30, 1999 and 1998;
Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item
through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2—pages 6 and 7 provide a summary
of expenses by line item through September 30, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 — Page 8
provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through September 30, 1999
and 1998; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including
total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions.
Capital Outlay Review.
r
$100,000,000
SaoWo,000
S80,000,000 r
$70.000,000
S60,000,000
r
$601000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
50 V
9/30199 Actual Capital Projected 1999-00 Originally Estimated
Outlay-S10,898,000 Capital Outlay- 1999-00 Capital
$92,401,500 Outlay. $92,401,500
r
As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $10,898,000,
or 11.79 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1999-00 as of September 30,
1999. Costs are proportionately low through the first quarter as most projects are still in
the design phase, but they are expected to approximate budget by year-end. _
Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay r
requirements incurred through September 30.
r
Section 1 - Page 4
Overview
" For more detailed information, Section 3 — Pages 2 through 6 provide a summary of the
construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 7
through 11 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over
" the project life.
Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At September 30, 1999, revenues from all
Revenue Areas totaled $7.1 million, or 5.07 percent of budget. Tax allocations and
subvention revenues, budgeted at$32.86 million, are only at 5.85 percent of budget, or
.. $1.9 million, and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual
Revenue Areas, budgeted at $74.3 million, is only at 0.79 percent of budget, or
$585,000. Both of these revenue sources are low because most of the property tax
apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the
property tax roll are not distributed to the District until after the first quarter of each year.
Interest revenues, budgeted at $26.8 million, are only at$4,097,000, or 15.30 percent,
due to lower than expected interest rates on investments and the impact of "marking to
market" in this environment.
r
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $41.8 million, or 22.3 percent of
budget through September 30, 1999. COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense,
budgeted at $41.7 million, are high at 40.91 percent of budget, or$17.1 million because
the first of the semi-annual interest payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal
year. Conversely, the costs incurred related to capital improvement projects (share of
.. Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are
proportionately low through the end of the first quarter at$10,898,000, or 11.79 percent
of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section.
r
Self-insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers'
Compensation and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund
., accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing
these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area
contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid,
claims administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $169,000 or 14.9 percent of budget at
September 30, while total expenses were $317,300 or 28.29 percent of budget.
Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6)
pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of September 30, 1999.
Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and
incorporated into the 1999-00 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance
measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured,
achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to
further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's
critical goals for 1999-00, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level.
r
Section 1 - Page 5
1999-00 First Quarter Review
At September 30, 1999, 75 percent of the District's performance objectives and 64% of U
the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end.
L
I
L
u
L
L
�i
L
I
V
V
II
V
L
I
L
L
L
Sectlon 1 -Pegs 8
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
- 0&M
Engineering 54%
2%
r GSA
10%
r Finance
5%
Comm.
1%
'e, Into.Tech
8%
Exec.Mgmt. Tech.Svcs. H/R
3% 17% 2%
r
Departmental Gallonage Charges
1999-00 Budget
r
Engineering
0% O&M
56%
r GSA
10%
r Finance
6%
Comm.
1%
r Info.Tech.
5%
Exec.Mgmt H/fl
3% Tech.Svcs.
r 19% 2%
r Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Three Months Ended September 30. 1998
O&M
- Engineering 81%
0%
GSA
9%
r
Finance
6%
Comm.
r 1%
Into.Tech.
3%
Exec.Mgmt.
r 2% Tech.Svcs. HIM
17% 1%
Section 2—Page 1
r
ll
1999-00 First Quarter Report
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge 1
For the Three Months Ended September 30, U
9130196 9130196 9130197 9130198 1999400 913M9
Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual W
Flow In Million Gallons 21,W7.71 22.344.81 22,896.85 23.2W.07 91,240.89 22,005,00
Flow In Million Gallons oar Day 237.04 242.88 248.80 252.57 250.DO 239.84 LI
General Manager.D.partmont 13.35 12.9 12.95 9.46 14.09 15.10 11��11
Communications 8.11 5.08 5.32 5.541 5.21 7.37
Human Resources Department 7.25 10.30 11.W 7.40 9.43 10.98 I
Finance Department u
Finance Administration 20.02 18.33 10.42 13.81 10.37 0.05
Accounting 10.14 7.46 10.70 11.01 8.16 13.68
Purchasing 8 Warehousing 7.38 4.19 5.18 6.86 8.92 0.29 J
Tout 37.54 29.95 32.35 31.70 31.45 31.02
a...ml Services Department
General Services Administration 2.74 6.50 4.15 4.25 3.31 3.33
Collection Facilities Maintenance 0.79 2.99 1.54 3.90 3.62 16.50 u
Plant Facilities Maintenance 37.73 38.36 33.46 35.03 43.03 38.01
Total 41.28 47.84 39.46 43.19 51.00 50 St
I nfomntlon Technology Department
I.T.Administration - - - 2.57 0.19 7.75 L1
Customer 8 HenauA Support 2.47 4.79 7.87 6.38 11.78 15.52
Programing 5 CaleOese 3.84 6.44 8.85 2.76 3.10 5.60
Process CM Integration 12.56 0.77 3.25 3.22 3.69 1.42
Total 18.87 14.00 17.97 10.93 24.76 33.35 led
Operations 8 Maintenance Department
Opns 8 Maint. Administration 12.88 12.92 2.32 2.10 3.33 1.80
O 8 M Process Engineering 4.81 3.60 5.24 4.42 6.17 9.15 6.1
Plant No.1 Operations - 75.55 67.00 70.73 63S2 89.05
Plant No.2 Operations - 109.80 89.13 95.07 94.91 101.65
Mechanical Malnlenence 49.69 50.63 44.88 60.83 48.80 46.46
Electrical S Instrumentation Maintenance 41.33 39.14 43.57 45.56 49.42 52.39 V
Air Ouality,8 Special Projects - 7.73 8.12 7.48 13.69
Central Generation 26.48 31.55 23.31 28.82 29.80
Plant Operations 198.56 - - - -
Total 307.05 317.12 291.47 301.14 300.53 324.30 L
Technical Samicas Department
Technical Services Administmtlan 6.25 3.96 5.33 7.33 1.29 1.26
EnWmnm rntal Compliance 5 Monitoring W.89 38.96 27.81 32.28 40.76 47.87 1
Emhonmental Sciences 1a0oralory 39.29 31.88 29.29 33.55 34.49 42.78 V
Source Coastal 0.55 2.98 3.03 8.43 2.75 11.17)
Safety 5 Emergency Response 6.58 8.23 3.56 2.74 8.53 9.37
Total 78.W 81.99 09.22 82.83 91.82 100.10
Engineering Department Irrl
Engineering Administration 0.53 0.71 - 0.02 0.05 10.78)
Planning 8 Design 0.91 2.08 0.19 0.81 0.03 0.40
Construction Management 0.44 1.77 1.11 0.41 1.97 12.47
Total 1.88 4.54 1.30 1.24 2.00 12.15 V
Total Joint Operating Expenses 511.67 523.21 481.06 499.59 530.41 WAS
Lase:Revenues (43A (36.12) (63,95) (49,92) (48.17) (49.B3I `
Net Joint Operating Exp....a 468.24 487.09 417.71 449.67 482.24 544.20 1I61'
IIsiI
irs
Section 2-Page 2
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
1999-0o
9130197 9130198 Year to Data Budget%
Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 9130199 Realized
General Manager's Department 296.624 219,871 1,286,600 333,190 25.92%
r Communications 121.848 131,107 475,200 162.626 34.22%
Human Resources Department 266,186 173,500 860,700 241,888 28.10%
Finance Department
Finance Administration 376,863 320,823 1,494,000 177.613 11.89%
Accounting 246,403 255,886 744,200 301.808 40.0%
Purchasing 8 Warehousing 118,691 159,952 631,400 204,920 32.45%
Total 740,957 736,661 2,859,600 684,341 23.81
General Services Department
General Services Administration 95,116 98,927 301,900 73,537 24.36%
Collection Fadfi ies Maintenance 42,082 9D,560 348,400 408.192 117.16%
Plant Facilities Maintenance 766,053 813,845 4.008,900 838.699 20.92%
Total 903,251 1,003,332 4.669,200 1,320.428 28.34%
Information Technology Department
I.T.Administration - 59,723 565,000 171,054 30.28%
r Customer 8 Network Support 180,228 194.696 1.075,000 408,746 38.02%
Programing 8 Database 155,957 64,207 2a2,400 124,807 44.20%
Process Cut Integration 74,498 74,795 336,400 31,256 9.29%
Total 411,683 393,622 2.268,800 735,863 32.58%
Operations 6 Maintenance Department
Opns a Maint. Administration 53,177 48,717 303,750 39,726 13.08%
0&M Process Engineering 119,976 102,743 562,550 201,789 36.87%
W Plant No. 1 Operations 115341193 1.643,542 5,804,800 1,523,498 26.25%
Plant No.2 Operations 2,040,972 2,232,304 8,659,300 2,248,050 25.96%
Mechanical Maintenance 1,027,557 1.181.034 4,452,800 1,024,987 23.02%
Electrical B Instrumentation Mtce. 997,665 1,058,637 4,509,100 1.156,092 25.54%
Air Quality 8 Special Projects 177,001 168,589 680,900 301,964 44.35%
Central Generation 723.026 641,541 2,446,700 659,502 26.95%
Total 6,673,567 6,997.087 27,419,900 7,155,594 26.10%
ed Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 126,539 182.004 665,000 27.622 4.15%
Environmental Compliance 3 Monitoring 636,652 749,979 3,719,300 1,056,358 28.40%
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 870,se1 779,480 3,147,300 944,013 29.99%
Source Contact 59.325 149,468 260,700 (26,879) (10.32%)
Safety 8 Emergency Response 81.538 63,593 595,500 206,e76 34.71%
Total 1.684,745 1,924.524 8,377,80D 2,208,790 26.36%
`+ Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 1 418 5,600 (17,138) (306.D4%)
Planning 8 Design 4.273 18.815 3.100 10,072 324.90%
ew Construction Management 25,390 9.525 179,50D 275,181 153.30%
Total 29.664 28,758 183,200 268,115 142.46%
Total Joint Operating Expenses 11,028,626 11,608,462 48,395,000 13,110,835 27.09%
Less:Revenues (1,464,240) (1,159,917) (4,395,000) (1,101,648) 25.07%
Net Joint Operating Expenses 9,584,285 10,448,545 44,000,000 12,009,167 27.29%
Section 2—Page 3
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report 60
Summary of Expenses by Major Category L
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent
u
Budget Thru Thm (Decrease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining
Description 1999-00 W30199 9130198 9 % Realized Budget
Salary,Wages&Benefits 37 655,800 10.022.092 9,649,479 372,613 3.86 26.62 27,633,708
Administrative Expenses 804,100 239,883 196.575 41.308 20.80 29.83 564,217
L
Printing&Publication 386,500 77,647 $6,183 (8,536) (9.90) 20.09 308,853
l
Tralnin9 8 Meetings ngs 991.000 194,104 94,599 99,505 705.19 19.59 796,89E y
Operating Expenses 4909,200 1,227.259 1,261.260 (34,D01) (2.70) 25.00 3,681,941
II
Contractual Services 6,737,70D 1,882,076 1.423,949 458.127 32,17 27,93 4,855,624 611
Professional Services 2,480,900 419,468 271,193 148,275 54.68 16ei 2.061,432
1I
Research B Monitoring 2.428,600 575,471 471.300 104,171 22.10 23.70 1.853,129 y
Repairs&Maintenance 5$30,400 1,078,731 677.905 400.826 59.13 19.16 4,551,669 1
Utilities 3.578,500 994400 717,766 276.634 38.54 27.79 2,684.100
Other Materials,Supplies, I
and services 2.524.900 480.021 480,463 19,568 4.25 19.01 2,044,879 (nl
Net Cost Allocation (19.732.600) (4.080,317) (3704,193) (376,124J 10.15 20.68 (15,652,283) '
4
Total Joint Operating Expense 48,395.000 13.110.835 11.608.469 1,502,366 12.94 27.09 35,284,195
Revenues 8 Offsets (4,395,000) 1 1( . 01.BMI 1( 159.917) 58,269 (5.02) 25.07 (3,293.352) I 1
Net Joint Operating Expense 44,000,000 12,009,187 10,446,552 1,560,635 14.94 27.29 31,990,813 u
Gallonage Flow(MG) 91,240.89 22,065.00 23,236.07 (1,171) (5.04) U
Gallonage Flow(MGD) 250.OD 239.84 252.57 (12,73) (5.047
Gallonage Flow(8's/MG) 482.24 5442E 449.67 94.59 21.04
I �
6L
L
L
L
Section 2-Page 4
L
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
'r For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
%
r Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase
Budget Thm n. Remaining thru (Decrease) (Decrease)
Description 1999-00 940199 9130199 Budget etim $ %
r
Inter District Sever Use 1,500,000 399,953 26.66 1,100,047 359.592 40,381 11.22
Wastehauler 425,000 94,186 22.16 330,814 116,279 (22,093) (19.00)
Sludge Disposal 900,000 182,638 20.29 717,362 177,083 5,555 3.14
Scrap Sales 25,000 - - 25,000 - - WA
Other Sales 200,000 445 0.22 199,655 625 (180) (28.80)
Rents&Leases 120.000 91.670 76.39 28,330 90.469 1,201 1.33
General Non40pereting 50,000 36.431 72.86 13,569 13,181 23,250 176.39
r
VehideB Equipment 300,000 74,480 24.82 225,540 74,055 405 0.55
Sampling Charges 325,000 102.785 31.63 222,215 124,561 (21,776) (17.48)
em Power Sales 550,000 119,080 21.65 430,920 204.072 (84,992) (41.65)
Total Joint Operating Revenues 4.395.000 1,101.648 25.07 3293,352 1,159,917 (58,269) (5.02)
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section 2-Page 5
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report 1.0
Summary of Expenses by Line Item u
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Fspeme %Expense Egeme Increase Increase I ,
Budgrt Thm Thm Renaming Thm (Decrease) (Decrease) J
Dascreflon 199900 9130M 9/309 Budget 9l3W98 9 %
Salaries,Wames.B BeneBls
Salaries&Wages 32123,300 8,372599 2606 23,750.701 8,322.466 50.133 0.6D
Employee Benefits: I
Retirement 1,938,600 634,433 3273 1.304.157 493,928 140,505 28.45 err
Croup lmuralxes 3,177,000 892234 28.08 2,254766 733.443 158,791 21.65
Tutor Rarbun;annelV - 25,753 WA (25,753) 25.600 153 0.60 �
lhn8ornfclanbl 67,200 16,584 24.68 50.616 15.612 972 6,23 y
V4bdres'Compensation 237,400 77.499 32.64 159,9DI 54,75D 22,749 41.55
Unarplofnad insurance lIZ30D 2990 266 109,310 3,680 (690) (18.75)
Total Benefits 5,532.,500 1,60,493 29.81 3,833,07 1,327,013 322,480 24.30 6d
Salaries,Milos,&Benefits 37,6M= 10.022.092 2&62 27,633.708 9,649.479 372,613 3.86
Mae Supply,&services L
Adrrinistra8ve Expenses
Merberships 182,100 80.525 4422 101575 59.423 21,102 3&61
Office Ep-Supplies 155XI 29.774 19.18 125,426 54,423 (24,649) (4529) y
OIBoaEperse-Otter 109.00D 19.038 17.47 89,962 28,624 (9,586) (33.49)
SmaOCalputerllans 250.00D 81,538 32.62 168.462 45,084 36,464 Wes
Wor Furniture,ForWres,etc 17,800 29.008 26.91 78.792 11,021 17,997 163.21
r
Prirring&Publicarton
Rep: 4r,House 2115,IDD 58.245 20.42 226,9W 55,197 3,048 5.52 i
Pnnting-Outside 67.500 6,388 9.46 61,112 22,129 (15,741) (71.13)
Wtces&Ads 23,60D 10,889 46.14 12711 6,648 4,241 63.79
Photo Processing 1O,2W 2125 20.83 8.075 2,209 (84) (3.8%
, I
Training&Meetings L
mee8ngs =M0 60.144 21.25 185,a% 4%M 1,055 2.15
Training 755,000 143,950 19.07 611.040 45.510 98.460 216M
Operating Expenses V
Chemhal Coagulants 1,37,300 zr%m 2135 1.028,022 305.954 (27,706) ( .0%
Sulfide Control 1,255A90 291,956 2325 90.844 298,688 (6,73% (LS) j
OdorContol 1,424,200 354,757 25.61 1,059,433 401,582 (30.765) (9.16) L
Chend®Is-Cogeneration Opx. 29,700 1,828 5.48 28,072 Z743 (1,115) (40.651
NSstEllar CMrnicals 17,300 6.477 37.44 1O.10 - 6.477 WA I
Caroline,Diesel&01 158,600 31,756 20.02 126.844 75.185 (43.430) (5776) V
Tools 188,300 30,511 19.13 137.789 20.661 9,850 47.67
Sole,Pamis,&Jan.Supplies 41,6OD 10.730 25.79 30.810 21,489 (10,759) (5007)
Lab Clericals&Supplies 359.000 170,77 47.36 188,e23 M172 79,905 Bill j
Otter OPeaerng supplies 147.400 40,079 27.19 l(Y7= 411104 (3.m (8.50) �r1
(Continued) .
L
�rll
Section 2-Page 6
1
L
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
`. For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase
Budget Thru Thm Remaining Thru (Decrease) (Decrease)
Description ISW99 9130199 9130199 Budget 9130M $ %
continued
`.
Contractual Services
Solids Removal 4,293,500 1,083,749 25.24 3,209,761 1,127,692 (43,943) (3.90)
Other Waste Disposal 490,700 124,553 25.38 355.137 42,626 82,037 192.91
rl Gmundskespin9&Janitorial 262,000 87,412 33.36 174,588 32.047 55.W5 172.76
Outside Lab Services 147,700 47,338 32.05 100,352 24.169 23.179 95.94
Oxygen Plant Oper 331,500 69,890 21.08 281,610 65,654 1,206 1.76
Other 1,212,300 469,124 38.70 743,176 126,841 340.283 254.11
Professional Serviras
Legal 390,DD0 125,274 32.12 264,725 120,856 4,416 3.65
Audit&Accounting 4S8DD 32,776 70.03 14,024 27,067 Sees 21.00
Engineering 465,500 59,160 12.71 406,340 27,592 31,568 114.41
Otlmr 1,571L60D 202268 12.81 1,376,342 95,656 106.602 111."
Research&Nbnitodng
Ervimnmental Monitoring 1,678,10D 455.424 27.14 1,222,676 390,980 64.444 16.48
AT Quality Monitoring 95,000 - 95,ODD 32D (320) (100.OD)
Research 655,500 120.047 18.31 WSAW $0,000 40.047 50.06
e.l Repairs B Maintenance
Materials&Services 3,809,10D 985.372 25.87 2,823,728 476,811 508.561 105.66
Svc.Mtc.Agreements 1,821,300 93.359 5.13 1,727,941 201,094 (107,7W) (53.57)
LIElides
r Telephone 247,70D 54,748 22.10 192,952 45.293 9.455 20.88
Diesel For Generators 10.OW - - 10,000 - - WA
Natural Gas 1,032.WO 319.887 30.98 71Z613 224,303 95,584 42.61
Pener 1,411,400 403,998 25.62 1,007,4D2 246,016 157.982 64.22
Water 876.900 216,767 24.81 651,133 202,154 13.613 6.73
Other Operating Supplies
Outside Equip Rental 179AM 25,712 14.32 153,866 23,297 2,415 10.37
Dal ict Equip Rental 319,400 74.195 23.23 245205 73,746 449 0.61
Insurance 1,188,000 240,649 20.26 947,351 253,397 (12,738) (5,03)
F"M 58,6DO 12,857 22.72 43,743 14,409 (1,552) (10.77)
Max,Operating Expense 185,000 46,719 25.12 139,281 36,535 10,164 27,87
ACM)Operating Fees 142,000 61,226 43.12 80,774 64,834 6,392 11.66
General Manager Contingency 405b00 - - 405,900 - - WA
r Other Non Oper Expense 47,400 Isom 39.37 28.737 4,246 14,418 339.65
Maus,5upp.&serv. 30,471,80D 7,169.050 23.63 23,302,740 5,663,183 1,505,877 26.69
Toil J.O.Requirements 68,127,600 17,191J52 25.23 50,935,448 15,312,662 1,678,490 12.27
Net Cost Allorabon (19,732,6DO) (4,080,317) 20.65 (15,652283) (3,704,193) (376,124) 10.15
Nut J.O.Requiraments 48,395,000 13,110,835 27.09 35,284,165 11,6D8,469 1,502.366 12.94
r Lass: Revenue (4,395,000) (1,101,648) 25.07 (3,293,352) (1,159,917) 58,269 (5.02)
Net J.O.Expenditures 44,000,000 12,009,187 27.29 31,990.813 10,448,552 1,560,635 14.94
ICI
Section 2-Page 7
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process
For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
Increase Increase
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 6I
9130199 9130198 $ %
Treatment Process:
Lr
Preliminary Treatment 1,031,394 949,633 81,761 8.61
Primary Treatment 1,192,076 1,133,234 58,842 5.19
Secondary Treatment 732,585 865,929 (133,344) (15.40)
Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 127,781 76,389 51,392 67.28 L
Effluent Disposal 182,523 164,757 17,766 10.78
L
Solids Handling 4,057,453 3,236,004 821,449 25.38
Cogeneration 981,933 821,983 159,950 19.46
Utilities 262,784 251,923 10,861 4.31 L
I '
Electrical Distribution 159,294 153.902 5,392 3.50 �+
Miscellaneous Buildings 1,477,070 1,492,406 (15,336) (1.03)
N
Air Quality 564,539 419,655 144,884 34.52
Laboratory 876,157 856,879 19,278 2.25 V
Source Control 1,465,246 1,185,775 279,471 23.57
Total Joint Operating Requirements 13,110,835 11,608.469 1,502,366 12.94
Less: Revenues (1,101,648) (1,159,917) 68,269 5.02
y
Net Joint Operating Expenditures 12.009,187 10,448,552 1,560,635 14.94
L
V
Ir
L
V
Section 2—Page 8
L
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
September 30, 1999
700 673
560 560
575 549
519
450
613011996 6/30/1997 6130/1998 6130/1999 9130,1999
■Actual ■Vacant
At September 30, 1999, the total head count was 507 employees, or a full time equivalency of
497,75.
r
r
Section 2—Page 9
1999-00 First Quarter Report
y
L
1-
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
u
u
L
6.1
y
L
L
Section 2—Page 10
L
CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program— FV 1999-00
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Plant t
S845575
Collection Projects
S3,707,023 "ice
Plant2
St G]0,]95
LY f 14'.
t
Equipment Items Interplant&Joint
5801,792 Facilities
]y S3,076,911
28".
Special Projects
S995,433
9%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure- S10,897,529
Revenue
Area 3 Revenue
Area 13
S4.500,176 S85,567
41%
Revenue
Area 2
Revenue S2,]15,54]
Area 1 251.
5812.205
]96
Revenue
Area 1 t
Revenue
5623,495 Revenue
Areas
Revenue Revenue
6% Area 14 S5A,971
5181,920 Area] Area 6
2aa $991.701 S408,946 5'.
9% 4%
Total Capital Improvement Funding -S10,897,529
Section 3—Page 1
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year I I
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 V
199940 199940 1999-00 1999-00
Fstlmalad Actual Remaining Projected
Outlay @9r30%) Outlay Outlay L
Revenue
System Imoroent Projects
Revenuenue vam Area 1
a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1.17 17.000 14,778 2,222 17.000
b Miscellaneous Capital Improverrente 15.000 15,0D0 15,000 L
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 1 32.000 14,778 17,222 32,000
Revenue Area 2
a Same Ana River Interceptor Realignment&Protection,241 423,800 43,014 380,788 423800
b Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210,600 2,033 20&567 210:600 L
c Aswood Subbunk Improvements,2-W 214.000 1.224 21Z776 214,000
d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,234R 1,256.0D0 502,170 753.630 1,256,0D0
a Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sfn.Abandonment,2.24-1 1,253,300 504 1.252,738 1,263,300 I
f Euclid Relief Improvements-Reach"A",252 1,700 1,082 616 1,700 y
g Miscellaneous Capital Improvements S0,000 22.214 37.766 80,0D0
h Trunk Sewer Mapping ProJed 80,400 - 80,400 80,400
1 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Saver,2-21-1 283,600 678 252,922 263,600
I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 63,800 4.112 59,688 53,800 L
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 3,827,200 577,091 3.250,109 3,827,200
Revenue Area 3
a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,338.1 4,825,9D0 1.132,959 3.892,941 4,875,900
b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Serer In Western Ave.,341 76.000 2,482 73.518 76,000 ln�
c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3-11R 219,500 252,755 (33.255) 252,755
d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,335R 3.437.600 875,320 2,562,280 3.437,800
a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 14,789 45,211 BO,ODO L
f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 89.400 6.757 83,643 89.400
g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101,a00 101,900 101,900
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3 8,810,300 2,254,082 S528,238 8,643,555
Revenue Area 6
as
a Relocation of Lido Pump Station,5<1-1 332,600 252,136 80,484 332,800
It, Replacement of Berk Bay Trunk Sewer,5<8 950.400 12,954 937,418 950,400
c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements SO,DDO 10,841 49.159 60,000
d Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 80,5m - 80,500 90,50D 60
a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,500 11,514 166.985 178,500
f Trunk Saver Mapping Project 13,400 13,400 13,40D
Sub,Total-Revenue Area 5 1.016.400 287.475 1.327,925 1,815,400
Revenue Area 6 �I
a Fakvlew Relief Sewer,6.12 858,900 140,430 718,470 858,900
b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,0D0 - 15,000 15,000
c Rehab115ation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 38.200 2.467 35.733 38,200
d Trunk Sever Mapping Projed 10,700 10,700 10,70D 1�1
Sub•Total-Revenue Am =,Sao 142,807 779,903 922,800
Revenue Area 7
a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 208,300 13,570 194,730 208,300
cq L
b Rauet Hill Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,800 918 203.582 204,800
c Tustin AiNaeaNmatrong Subbunk Sewer,7.27 14090D 28,150 112,750 140,900
d Gisler-Rsdlall Trunk Relocation,7.32 1201 100 129,800 129,90D
a Orange Trunk Improvements,7.39 55,20D 2,530 52.670 55,200 J
f Gisler-Radhlll Trunk improvements,Resch"A",736 355,800 2,633 363,167 365,800
g RA5"B"Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7.28 357,70) 30,558 327,142 357,700
h Gisler-RadhillModh Trunk Improvements,741 350,70) Z553 348,147 350700
i Miscellaneous Capital Impmvemanls 60.000 148,769 (85,769) 148:789 LI
J Sunflower Intercepter Manhole Rehab.,7.21 188,601) 15.545 173,055 188,600
k Pumpstatlon SCADA Communications Study 78,1011, - 78.100 78,100
1 Trunk Serer Mapping Project 16,100 - 16,100 16.100
Sub-Total-Revenue Am 2,155,90D 245,328 1,010,574 2,244.W9 L
Section 3-Page 2 L
L
CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program—FV 1999-00
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Plant 1
$845,575
Collection Projects 0�•
$3,7W,923
34% Plant 2
$1,470,795
14%
Equipment Items Interplant a Joint
$801,792 Facilities Special Projeets
7% $3,076,911
28%
$995,423
9%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$10,897,529
Revenue
Area Revenue
Area 13
54,500,176 $85,567
41% 1%
Revenue
Area 2
Revenue 52,715,547
Area 1 25%
5812,205
7°e
Revenue
Area 11 Revenue
$623,496 Revenue Area 5
6% Area 14 Revenue Revenue
$181,920 Area 7 Area 5 S577,971
2% 5991,701 S408,946 5%
9% 4%
Total Capital Improvement Funding-S10,897,529
Section 3—Page 1
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 LI
1999-00 199940 199MD 199940
Estimated Adual Remaining Projected
Outlay 9f10199 Outlay Outlay u
Collection Svs[em Improvement Pmiacta
Revenue Area 1
a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-17 17,000 14,778 2,222 17,000
b Macellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 15,DD0 15,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 1 32,000 14,778 17,222 32,000
Revenue Area 2
a Santa Me River Interceptor Realignment 8 Protection,241 423,800 43.014 3BD,786 423,800
b Same Ma River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210,60D 2,033 206,567 210,600 L
c Atwood Subtnmk Improvements,2-50 214,000 1,224 212,776 214,000
d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,266,000 SOZ170 763,830 1,256.0D0
e Carbon Crryn Sewer and Pump Sir.Abandonment,2.24.1 1,253,300 564 1,252,736 A" 52 1.253,3D0 L
f Eudid Relief Improvements-Reach" 2- I'm 618 1,700
g Miscellaneous Capital Improvements %BOB 22.214 37,758 60,0D0
It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 80.400 - 80.400 80,40D
I Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2.214 all 678 262,922 253,600 L
j Rehabinatlon of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 63,500 4.112 W.5118 63.800
SURTotal-Revenue A.2 3,a27,200 577.091 3,250,109 3,827,200
Revenue Area 3
a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,33 l 4,825900 1,132,959 3,692,941 4,825,900
b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave.,19-1 78,D00 2,482 73,518 76,000 L
c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3�11R 219,500 252.755 (33,255) 252.755
d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,1MR 3A37A)) $75.320 2,562,2B0 3,437,600 L
e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 6D.00D 14.789 45,211 60,000
f Rehabililallon of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 89,40D 5.757 83,643 89,400
g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101,900 101,900 101,900
SutrTotal-Revenue Am 8,810,300 2,284,052 6,326,238 8,843,555 L
Revenue Area 6
a Reocation of Lido Pump Station,541.1 332,600 252.136 80,464 332,60D
b Replacement of Back Say Trunk Sewer,546 950,400 12.984 937,416 9W.40D
c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 10.641 49,159 30,OOD
d Pumpstabon SCADA Communications Study 80,sm - 80.500 80,5m u
a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,SM 11.514 156,9as 178,5D0
f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 13,400 13,400 13,400
Sub-Total-Revenue Ama6 1.615,400 207,475 1,327,925 1,615,40D
Ravenna Ana 6 Y/
a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 8581900 140,430 718,470 858,900
b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,00g 15,000 15,0DD L
c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 38,200 2,467 35.733 38,200
d Trumc Sarver Mapping Project 10,700 10,700 10,700
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 6 522,800 142,897 779,903 922,800
Revenue Area 7
a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 208,300 13,570 194.730 205,300
b Racquet HIII Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,8W 918 2D3,682 204,600
c Tustin Airbase Armstrong Subbunk Sewer,7.27 140,900 28,15D 112.750 140,900
d Gisler-Redmll Trunk Reklcetlon,7-32 129,900 100 129.800 129,900
a Orange Trunk Improvements,7-39 55.200 2,530 52.670 55,200
f Glalar-Redhlll Trunk Improvements,Read)"A",7.36 365,800 2.633 363.167 365,800
g RA$"B"Saee(ant Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7.28 357.700 30,558 327.142 357.700
h Gleler-Redhll9Hodh Trunk Improvements,741 350.700 2,553 348.147 350,700 L
i Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 148,769 (88,789) 148,769
j Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7.21 fello0 15,545 173.055 1BB,600
k Pumpstadon SCADA Communications Study 78,100 - 78.100 78,10D
I Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 18,100 15,100 16,100
Sub-Totel-Revenue Am 2,155,900 246,328 1,910,574 2,244,669 L
Section 3-Page 2
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
•+ For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
199940 19" 1999-00 1999.00
Estineled Actual Remaining Pmleeled
r OLIUW @9/30/99 Outlay Outlay
Revalue Area 11
a Huntington Beall Sewer and Abandonment 11-23 446,200 5,031 441,169 446,2W
b Goldertaesd Trunk Sewer Replaamaa,11-17-3 2,579.300 33,430 2.545.870 2,579,3W
r c Heil Avenue Interceptor,11-20 2,565,800 74,422 2,491,378 2,565,B0
d Wamer Avenue Relief Serer, ll-M 448,000 3,795 442,205 446,0W
e Miscellaneous Capl311mpmvemerRs 6D,000 35.015 24,985 60,000
f Rehabilitaiton of Outlying Purrs Stations,2-37 57,400 3.701 53,699 57,400
r g Purltlystudon SCADA Cmmnunimtiore Study 78.100 - 78.100 78,10D
h Tnmk Sewer Mapping Project 26,800 26,800 26,800
Sub-Total-Revenue Area ll 6,259,6D0 155,394 6,104,208 6,259,600
r Revenue Area 14
a Mscelaneous Capital lmpnwerents SAOD 6.000 6.000
Sub-Total-Revenue Am 14 6.000 6,0DD 6.000
Total Collection System
r Improvement Pmlects 23.679= 3.701 19.%Z177 23,751,224
The ornem&Disposal Proiecfs
Reclamation Plant No.1
1. Preliminary Treatmend
a Heatlworks No.2 Pump Imp.&Overhaul 2D0,200 - 200,2D0 200,200
r b Sunflover P.S.DrNs Replaoanent,P162 389,800 5.313 384.487 389,800
c Grit Chamber ModiBmtions Pl-69 107,800 100 107,700 107,800
2. Porrery,Treatrnent
a PmnaryTnaVner072 MGD Expansion,Pl-37 2.440,000 312,125 2.127,875 2,440,OOD
r, It Printery Effluent Riming Automation 171,80D 8,098 163,702 171.800
3. Secondary Treatment
a Secondary TreaVroBM Expansion to 80 MGD,P1-3 2 687,200 85,839 601,361 687.200
b Rehabilitate Four Tridding Fitters.Pl-76 10,5W - 10,5D0 10,500
r c Five Tricidirg Filler Clardiers,P1-TI 10,5W - 10,5W 10,500
4. Solids Handling&Digestion
a Mechanical Seals on High Rate Digester Ma,SP-30 425.WO 6,418 418,582 425,OW
b Dek4tering Be6 Preas Rebuild 173.800 - 173,800 173.800
r 5. utility Systans
a Chemical Facility MocHns,P146-2 2,531,600 43,876 2.487,724 2,531,600
It EIectl.FaalSy Moddns&Saety Upgmdes,P1461 57,100 4,239 52,861 57,100
Transfer to Project Balm (lzsm) - (12,500) (12,500)
Alarm Beacensfor Venting of Gas Holder 12,5W - 12,5W 12,5W
6. Safety&Securby Improvements
a Seismic Retrord of Four STNCNIees, P144d 934,700 289,502 645,198 934,7W
7. Msmllaneous&Support Prtryects
r a Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-PI 1,000,000 80,070 919,9W 1,0DO,g00
Sub-Total -Reclamation Rar81 9,140,O00 535,580 8,304,420 9.140,000
r Treamrent Plant No.2
1. Prefmnnary Treadmill
a Headivoiks Pump lrryrvmt&Overhaul,SP-32 216,5W 45.242 171,258 216,500
In Rehabaf Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,OW - 2W,D00 209,000
c Headmft lmproements @ Plant 2,P2-56 527,400 9,535 517,865 527,400
Transferto Project Belau - - -
ReplacarerR of Barsc+eer,Influent Gate,P263 - - - -
2 Primary Treatrrent
r'u a RehabD&EClzrieer Sweep Mrs 68,2W - 68,2W 68,2W
Section 3-Page 3
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year V
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 199900
Saturated Actual Remaining Projected
Outlay Q9130/99 Outlay OWay
3. Secondary Treatment
a DAF.Support Ral Replamrmrt 65,0W - 65,000 65,W0
4. Solids Handling 8 Dewatering
a Devastating Batt Press Rebuild,SP37 252,3W 129,051 123.249 252,300 44
b Sludge Grinder Replacsrmnt/Rehab,SP-36 55,500 5,007 60,4W 55,500
c Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 6,441,2W 79,035 6,362.165 6,441,2W
ofG-1,G-2 Conveyor Batt Rehab 41,800 - 41,SW 41,BW L
e Souls Storage Facility at Plant 2,P2E0 4,481,5W 17,225 4.464,274 4,481,500
S. Utility Systems
a High Pressure Compraased Air System,P231 488.600 11.912 476,688 488,600
b Modifnsto Era It Control Systurna 47-1 1,546,11W 389,539 1,157,251 1,546BD0 L
c Gas Caryressm Redundancy,P2-79 439,2W - 4311 439r2W
d UNitles Rehab B Refurbishment 13,000 - 13,OW 13.000
S. Safety Impro✓emeMa
a Peak Flow Management,J-67 57,70D 6,311 51,389 57.700
7. Process Related Special Projects
a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33.400 - 33,400 33,400
S. Information Management
a DAFT Hardware and Software Upgrade.SP-21 109.600 - Ical 109,60D L
9. Kiwellarview 6 Support Pmjeds
a Warehouse @ Plant No.2,P24 W1,000 605,510 255,49D 851.000
It Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-P2 1,00D,000 158,849 841,151 1,000,000
c Tunnel Lighting B Monitoring Rehab.,J-65 312,400 20D 312,200 31Z400 U
Sub-Total -Treabrrent PlaM2 17,220,100 1,457,411 15,762,689 17,220,100
Interplant and Joint Facilities
1. Collection Facilities
a Colkiction Facilities Depot,JLO.1 1,524,300 - 1,524.300 1,524,300
b Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-2-4 69,700 15,258 44,432 59,700
c SSO Training Facifity 20,400 - 20,400 20400
d Cc OF Projects,InlowAml.Reduction,J-73 3,476.400 3,696 3,471,704 3,475:400
Transfer to Project Below (40,ODD) - (40,O00) (40.000)
Nuisance Flow Diversion Fac at Newport Dunes 40,000 6,270 33.730 40,000
a Rehab&Upgrade of Ells Ave.Pump Station,1-10 61,1 W - 61,100 61,100 1
2. Headworks U
a New Grft Augers,J52 1,073,SW 4,034 1,059,566 1,073,600
3. Secondary TreaNant
a Sec.Treabmnt Mond.6CDI Syalem Upgmtle,J31-4 34,O0D 6,074 27,926 34,000
4. Ocean Outlall System L
a Investigation and Repaid of Oman OnMall,J39 235,400 151158 220.242 235,40D
b Foster Rehab.B Refurbishment,J-59 150.800 12,063 138,737 150,8W
S. Utility systems
a Can Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 431,6W 227,591 204,0Og 431.600 U
to Can Gen Air Compmssw Controller Upgrade 25.100 - 25,100 25,10D
c Imprvto Central Generalan Stating Air system,J33 122,700 996 121,704 122,700
it Modifns of Cen Gen Waste Heat Bolem,J-64 195,W0 - 195,000 195,OW
6. FJedriml Power System
a Area Cleasifim8mu Studies,Plants 1 82,J315-1 465,3W 45,901 419,399 465,300
to Cable Tray Improvements,J47 9997W 137,9D5 851,795 999,700
c Electrical Power System Shalm,J-Dia7rema,1255 17,400 - 7Z,9W 129W 6w
tl Electrical Power System Shdies,.1-254 717,4W 145,016 572,384 71],4W
e Standby power Reliability Modlns,J33-1 4,049,700 993,015 3,056,655 4,049,700
7. Flow Management B Reliability
a Outfall Flour Meter Replacement, LW 852,5W 49 6 W3,224 85215100 L
L
Section 3-Page 4
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
it For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
199940 1999-00 199900 1999-00
Estimated Actual Remaining Projected
Outlay @9l30199 outlay outlay
8. Safety&Security lrnpnwements
a Co nfinsd Space Personnel Rebiwal System,J49 292,600 - 292,60D 292,800
b Fire Alann&Secunty System Upgmde,J57 49,300 2,061 47.239 49,300
W 9. Wometlon Management&Corrputedzation
a Warehouse Bar Code Evalua0on 112,000 16.139 95,651 112,000
b Computoraed Fec Records and Dag.Sys.,J-2&1 732.600 46,619 685,981 732,500
c Intemet Application Deveibpment 147.100 38,860 108,220 147,100
r d Nehwnk Backbone Upgrade Continuation 625,200 38,588 586,612 U52M
e Fiber Optic Upgrades 512,100 98 512,002 512,1W
I O.Mecellaneous&Support Projects
r a Modifns to Existing Mechanical System,J62 1,082,400 7,532 1,074,858 1,022,400
b Facilities Engineering Projects,FEJ 1,DD0,0D0 71,996 928,004 1,000,0D0
c Odor Control Proc RehaNRefmb.,J-71 105,0D0 8.814 98,186 105,OD0
d Tunnels Structural Integrity and Cover Rehab.,J55 378,8D0 2.583 376,217 378,800
r e Chlorine Bldg Mach Equip Demolition,J60 175,100 471 174,629 175,100
f Infometion Technology Triton,Addi9on,Ml 369.900 1,518 358,382 369,900
g Small Capital Equipment Replacement Pojed 160,000 63,448 96,552 160.OD0
11.Water Management Projects
r a Groundwater Replenishment System,J36 2,767,400 183,554 2,683,846 2,767,400
12.Plant Automation
a Plant ReinveiNONAutomatlan Project,J42 5,492,000 800,031 4,691,999 5,49$OOD
b Power Monitoring and Control Sydene,J-3-3 817,600 1.847 815,753 817,600
r SubTctal -Interplant&Joint 29,325,700 2,946,442 26.379,258 29,325,700
SYb-Total - Major projects 0.685,800 5,239.433 50,446,367 55,665,110D
Special Projects
r t Primary Treat enl
a Emulsion Poryment Make-down Unit Upgrede 100,000 - logo00 100,0D0
2. Solids Handling&Digestion
a Ball Press Automation 173.000 64 M935 173,000
r b Biosolids ClassASBng Assasonant 110,0DO - 110,000 110.000
c Siosolids Management Site Aopuisilion 50,100 - 50,10D 60.100
3. Be"&Security lmprovemeMS
a Security System Improvements 405,800 2270 403,530 405.800
r 4. Process Related Spedal Projects
a Effluent Sampler ImpMemerts 100,0D0 - 100,000 100,000
5. IntomeBon Management
a Automation Report Publishing 58,1700 - 68,000 55,000
r b CN=PrognmM n9 198,700 1.173 197,527 IM700
c Document Management 264,9W 41,288 223,612 284,9OO
d Data Integration 1,251,200 146.812 1,104,388 1,251,200
e Source Control Programming 206,2D0 24.384 181,816 206,200
r f Strategic Information Arohitedure(SIN 378,700 18,495 350,204 378,700
g Geographic lntomrelion System 187,600 2571 185,029 187.600
h Intranet Application Development 58,100 - 58.100 58,100
r I SCAM Communications-Ethernet Study 161,90D - 161,900 161,9D0
J VoloaVata Building Rev4rirg 142,100 47,779 94,321 142,100
k Nelxork Test Facility 31,800 2,182 29,618 31,800
I Year 2000 Data Change 1,365,400 365,754 999,646 1,335,400
r m WMe,a 200D Om.System Upgrade Plot 154,900 1.679 153,321 154,900
n Field Fiber Optic Temuns Standardization 266600 - 288.60D 263,600
o Replacement of lntemplent Fiber Optics 75,400 - 75.400 75,400
p Financial Infometlon System 509,800 50,658 469,142 509.800
r q Records Management Program 224,8W - 224,800 224,800
r
Section 3-Page 5
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 L
199940 1999-00 199300 1999-00
E ahvl Actual Remaining Projected
Outlay @913/99 OW, Outlay L
6. Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 446,200 4,545 441,655 446.200
b Ravislon of Standard Specifications,J44 262,200 63,899 198,301 2OZ200 L+
c ShelvinWArohMng 30,000 - 30,000 301000
d Office Equipment 7.500 - 7,500 7,500
a Portable Storage Building 9,500 - 9,500 9,500
f Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase 1 70,100 - 70,100 70,100 u
g Ocean Monitoring Dalebeca-Phase ll 50,im - 50,1m 50,100
7. Straegic B Master Planning
a Strategic Pan-Phaea3,3403 222,600 13,960 200,640 222,600
b Strategic Pan Pmgw E3R J4O4 409,500 153,532 255,958 409.500 u
e Plant 0&M Manual&SO.P.Project,Phase 1 220,00D - 220,000 220,000
6. Water Management Projects
a Water Con oration Coop-Tout Retrofit Pgm,.L72 400,000 1,622 398.378 400,000
b Watershed Consultant Servics 150,000 - 150,000 160.000 u
9. Research&Development
a Special Pmlectsfor FY1999.2000 1,397,800 1,367,000 1,245,576 -
Sub-Total-Special Project IDUZ300 842,588 9,179,732 10,000278 L
Equipment Items; Z964,200 801,792 2,152,408 2,954.200
Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 68,772,300 6,90,793 61,788,W7 68,6W,278
Construction in Progress Completed at 6130199 205,713 (206,7131 Lu�l
Total Collections,TR.et,oM
and Disposal Project 92,401.500 101897,Mo 81,603,971 92,401,500
LJ 1
L
L
Yrl
L
J
U
Section 3-Page 6
W
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Current Total
Approved W30199 Year Projected Remaining
r Project Accumulated Projected Coat at Future
Budget Cost Cost M30/00 Budget
Collection%r Wm Immoveinere Prof
Revenue Area 1
r a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab., 1.17 7,494,000 53,W3 17.000 70,503 7,423.497
b Miscellerleous Capital lmplovemenb 500,000 15,000 15,00D 4a5,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 7,996,000 53,503 32,0g0 85,503 7,908,497
Revenue Arm 2
r a Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment B Protection,241 31,438,400 318,348 423,8W 74ZI48 30,B96,252
b Santa Am River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2-31 11,853,600 - 210,SW 210.600 11,64 om
c Atwood Subtrunk lmplovemarR5,2-50 1,890,1W - 214,000 214,000 1,SM100
d Euclid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,964,700 612,W6 1,256,000 1,868,005 96,694
ry a Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Purnp Sir,Abandonment,2-24-1 2,884,900 52.149 1,253,300 1,306,449 1,379,451
f Eudid Relief Irnplovenerlb-Reach W,2-52 12,213,000 - 1,700 1.700 12,211,300
g Miscellaneous Capital Improvernenls 2,000,000 - SD,000 6D,000 1,940,000
h Trunk Sewer Mapping Pmject 124,700 - 80,400 80,400 44,3D0
r i Carbon Canyon Darn Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2-21-1 6.008.800 253,8110 263,600 4.745,200
j Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 2,634,500 87,131 63,800 150,931 2,483,569
Sub.Total-Revenue Arm2 71,812,700 1,089,034 3,827,200 4,896,834 65,915,8m
Revenue Arm 3
r a Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Systam Rmtll 1.338-1 11,636,600 1.389.965 4.825.900 6.21505 5,320,735
b Mods.To Magnolia Relief Saner In Western Ave.,3.9.1 21Z300 138,252 7Q0D0 214,252 (1,952)
c Seal Beach Bl la amPtor Manhole Rehab.,3.11R 460,000 26,277 252.755 279,032 180.955
d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,335R 10,352,000 117,833 3,437,800 3,555,433 6.798,567
r e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000,000 - 60,000 Si 1.940.000
f Rehabilitation of Outlying Purr@ Stations,237 3,689,300 121.983 89,400 211,383 3.476.917
g Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 157,900 101,900 101,9D0 56.000
Sub-Total•Revenue Am 3 28,407,100 1,794.310 8'"3,555 10.637.865 17,769,235
Revenue Arm5
a Relocation of Lido Pump Station,5-41-1 3,395,200 2,826,785 332,60D 3,159,385 236,815
b Replacement of Bad%Bay Trunk Serer,6-46 8,093.800 16,278 950,400 966,678 7.127,122
r c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000,000 - 61 SD,000 1,940,000
d Purr station SCADA CommuniCOUM Study 80,500 75,550 fleam 156.050 (76.650)
e Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 7,376,700 243,965 176,SW 422.465 6,954=5
f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 20,800 13.40D 13,40D 7,400
r Sub-Total-Revenue Arm5 20,967,000 3,162,578 1,615,40D 4,777,978 16,189,022
Revenue Arm 6
a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 3.594,900 2,789,702 S58,90D 3.648.602 (53,702)
b Miscellaneous Capital lmPmvernenta 50Q000 - 15,000 15,000 485,000
r c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 1.580,700 52ZM 38,200 90,479 1,490,221
d Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 16.600 10700 10,700 5,900
Sub'robd-Revenue Atm6 5,692,200 2.841,981 M218M 3,764,781 1.927,419
Revenue Area 7
r a Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stakes,237 8,693,900 287,530 =300 495,830 8,198,070
b Racquat Hill Purr@ Station Abandonment.7-143 204,600 - 204,600 204,600 -
c Tustin ArbaSeAnnsrong Subhunk Sawar,7-27 9,654,400 198,471 140,900 339,371 9,315,029
d Gisler-Radhill Think Relocation,7-32 5,906,500 5,934 129,900 135,834 5,770,GW
r e Orange Trunk lrrprovemeMs,739 3,942.500 - 55.20D 66,200 3,887,300
f Gister-Redhill Trunk Irrlplovanents,Reach W 736 4,025.700 - 365,800 365,80D 3,659,900
g RA-6"6'Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Repl.,7-28 417,40D 39,361 357,700 397,051 20,339
h Gisler-RatlhilVNonh Trunk Improvements.741 5,704,100 - 350,700 350,700 5.353.400
'r i MLacellaneous Capital lrriprovements 2,000,000 - 148,769 148,789 1,851,231
j Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7-21 5,412,700 77,966 188,600 265,586 5,146,134
It Pumpstation SCADA Cgmlminigdorw Study 78,100 - 78,100 78,100 -
I Trunk Sewer Mapping Pmject 24,900 16,100 16.100 8.500
wb Sub-Total-Revenue Arm7 46,064.800 60l= 22A4,689 2,8.53,931 43.210,869
r
Seclion 3-Page 7
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 LI
Current Total
Approved 613DI99 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Projected Costal Future L
Budget Cost Cost 6130100 Budget
Revenue Areal l
a Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment,l l-23 538,700 54,028 446,200 500,228 38.472
b Goidenwasl Trunk Sewer Replacement,11-17.3 3,920,400 105771 2.679,300 2,6B5,071 1,235,329
c Hall Avenue Interceptor,11-20 4,072,900 99,5W 2,565,800 2,565,365 1,407,535
d Warne Avenue Relief Sever,11-22 4,027,700 446,00D 446.000 3,581,700
e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 2,000.000 - 60,000 60,000 1,940,ODD
f Rehabllita8on of Outlying Pump Stations,237 2,371,100 78.417 57,400 135,817 2,235,283
g Pumpslation SCADA CommunIcations Study 73,100 - 78,100 78,100
h Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 41,600 25,800 28,800 14,800
Sub-Total•Revenue Area 11 17,060,500 337,781 6,259.600 6.507,361 10,463,119
Revenue Area 14 1r�
a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 200.000 6,000 6,000 194,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Amalfi 200,000 6,000 61000 194,OD0
Total Collection System ILI'
Impiovemerd Projects 198.188.300 9,869,049 23,751,224 33,620.273 164,555,027
L
Treatment lant No Protects
ReReclamationn Plant No.1
1. Preliminary Treabnant
a Headworks No.2 Pump Imp.&Ovemaul 200,200 - 200.200 2DO,200 -
b Sunflower P.S.Dme Replacement P162 407,400 18,6u 389,8DO 408,454 (1,054)
c Gin Chamber Modifications,Pi69 141,800 - 107,800 107,800 34,000
2. Primary Tre3bnent
a Primary Treahlent72MGDExpenston,P1-37 76,450,100 1,012.186 2,440,000 3,462,196 71,997,914
b Prmary Effluent Pumping Automation 171,800 11,528 171,8W 183,328 (11,528)
3. Secondary Treatment
a Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P136.2 40,800,000 39,322.288 687,200 40,OD9,488 790512
b Rehabilitate Four Trickling Filters,Pi-76 %WD,0D0 - 10,500 10,500 9,489:500 LI
c Fee Trickling FiHe Cladfiels,P1.77 11,500,0D) - 10,500 10,500 11.489.500
4. Solids Handling&Notation
a Me animl Seals on High Rate Dgesler MM,SP30 517,000 130,127 425,000 555,127 (38,127) V b Dawatering Bell Pri ss Rebuild 626,800 - 173,800 173,800 353,000
S. utility Systems
a Chemical Facility ModBns,P146-2 4,235,300 685,308 2,531,60D 3,216,908 1.018,392 I
b Elect.Facility ModNns&Safety Upgredes,P140.1 442.900 231,923 57,100 289.023 153,877 L.I
Transfer to Project Below (12.500) - (12,50D) (12,500) -
Alarm Beacons for Venting of Gas Holder 12,500 2.573 12,500 15,073 (2.573)
6. Safety&Security Improvements
a Seismic Reboflt of Four SWctunes, P1444 1,329,000 2,673,014 934,700 3,607,714 (2,278,714)
7. Miscellaneous&Support Prgeds
a Facifities Engkwsnrg Projects,FE-PI 20,000,000 6D4.362 1,000,000 1.604,352 18,396,638
SuleTobd -Reclamation Plant l 165,22Z300 44,691,953 9,140,000 53,831,953 111,390,337
TrembnaM Pled No.2 u
1. Preliminary Treabrenl
a HeradsoMS Pump fnlprvnd&Overhaul,SP-32 300.000 83,808 216,500 310,408 (10,408)
b Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,000 - 209,000 209,000 - L.(
c Headworkslmprovemens@Plare2,P266 14,708.000 42,792 627.400 670,192 14,137,808
Transfer to"ad Below - _ - -
Replacement of Ban:aeen Influent Gate,P263 - 5,032 - 5.032 (6,032)
2. Primary Treatment
a Rehab D&E Clarifier SweepArms 68,2DO - 68,20D 68.200 -
Y�
Section 3-Page 8
L'
y CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
�r For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
Current Taal
Approved W30M Year Projected Remaining
yi Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Cost Cost 8130I00 Budget
3. Secondary Treatment
a DA R Support Rail Replacement 88,000 - 65,000 65,000 -
4. Solds Handling&Digsallon
a Dmearing Belt Press Rebuild,SP-37 825,000 55,970 252.300 308.270 516,730
b Sludge Gdnder Replacementifthab,SIP-36 224,000 - 65,500 55,500 168,500
c Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 22,011.500 1,236,114 6,441,200 7,677,314 14,381,186
d G-1,G-2 Conveyor Bak Rehab 41,800 - 41,800 41,800 -
e Solids Storage Facility at Plan 2,P260 18,324,9W 693,362 4.481,500 5,174,862 13.160.038
5. Wlity Systems
a High Pressure Compressed Alr System P261 560,000 61.841 488,600 550,941 9,559
to MotllMa te Dec.&CorNol System%P247-1 2,887,900 701,005 1,546.800 2.247,805 "0'095
c Gas Compressor Redundancy.P2-79 499,800 60 439.200 439,290 60,540
d 11111&le9 Rehab&Refurbishment 1,000,000 - 13,000 13,000 987,000
V 6. Flow Management&Reliability
a Peak Flaw Management,J67 3.640,000 3,994 57,700 61,694 3,578,306
7. Process Related Spacial projects
a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33,400 - 33,400 33,400 -
& Infommtbn Management
a DAFT Hardeare and Software Upgrade,SP-21 180,000 - 109,600 109,600 70.400
9. MISMImeous&Support Projects
a WamhoaseQPlan No.2,P265 1,598,000 912,411 861,000 1,773,411 (175,411)
ar b Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-P2 20,O(Ki 525,268 1,000,000 1,525,258 18,474,732
c Tunnel Ughting&Monitoring Rehab.,J65 459,500 312.400 312,400 147,100
Sub-Tobl -Treatment Plant 87,483,000 4,331.757 17,220.100 21,551,857 65,931,143
Interplant and Joint Faeilldec
r 1. Collection Facilities
a Collection Facilities Depot,J-10.1 1,534,100 - 1,524,300 1,524,300 9,800
to Bushan Trunk Seder Rehab.,1-24 32,803,500 43,798 59,700 103,498 32,700,002
_ c SSOTRIning Facility 63,803 - 20,400 20,400 43,400
d CO-Op Projects,1n8me/01i&Reduction,J-73 150,010,000 - 3,475,400 3,475,400 146,534.600
Transfer to Project Below (40.000) - (40,000) (40,000) -
Nueence Flux DlversM Fee at Newport Dunes 40,000 - 40.000 40,000 as a Rehab&Upgrade of EMs Ave.Pump Station,1-10 1,799.500 61,100 61.100 1.735,400
2. Headworlu
a New Gn Augara,J62 1,210,000 42.097 1,073,600 1,115.697 94,303
3. Secondary Treatment
y a Sae.Treatment Monti.&Ctn System Upgrade,J-314 4,316,000 459,644 34.000 493,644 3,&22,356
4. Ocean Oubit Systems
a Irneatigation and Repaid of Ocean Outbll,J-39 1,274,600 912.464 235,400 1,147.864 126,736
b Foster Rehab.&Refurbishment.J-59 26,200,000 - 150,900 150,800 28,049.200
ar S. Utility Systems
a Can Gen Engine Alr Emission Monhaing Sys 564,200 166,166 431,600 597,786 (33.586)
b Cen Gen Ak Compressor Conuollerllpgrad8 25.100 - 25,100 25,100 -
c ImprvbCenbal GemmUon8brbrg Air System,J63 140.700 7,223 122,700 129,923 10,777
d Modea,of Can Gen Waste Hen Boilers.J64 200,000 5,879 195,000 200.979 (879)
6. Electrical Power Systems
a Am Classiecetions Studies,Pisste 1&2,J-3rM 1.145.000 594,198 465,300 1.059,498 85,502
b Cable Tray lmpmvemente,J47 12,750,000 408.711 999,700 1,408,411 11,341,589
c Electrical Power System Singbll Ia Diagrams.J-2" 3,367,500 12,900 12,9W 3,364,600
d Electrical Poser System Studies,J-254 3,215,500 967.796 717,400 1,685,195 1,530,304
e Standby Power Reliability Modfns,J-33-1 17,370.100 1,559,865 4.049,700 51609.565 11,760,535
7. Flow Management&Reliability
a Gutian Flow Meter Repbanen,J66 924.000 7,639 852.500 860,139 63,861
r
Section 3-Page 9
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life I !
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999 L.I
current Total
Approvod 110100 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Protected costal Fo me
Budget cost Cost cost at Budget
S. Safety 8 Sewriry Impmvertwna
a Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J49 423,000 23,994 292,600 316,594 106,406 1
b Fire Atanm 8 Seau6y System Upgrade,J-57 627,000 612,064 49,30D 661,364 (34,364)
9. Information Managemerd 8 CompldeaQatien
a Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 112,000 16,139 112,000 126,139 (16.139)to Computerized Fao Records and Dwg.Sys.,J-25-1 4.956,300 894,482 732,600 1.627,082 3.329,218
c Intemet Applicatw Devebpmerd 382.200 96,579 147.100 243.679 138,521 U
d Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 1,439,000 665.125 625200 1,290,325 148.675
e Fber Optic Upgrades 660.000 241,120 51$100 753220 (9309)
10. Miscellaneo s 8 Support Projects I
a Mod6ns to Existing Mechanical System,J-62 2,694,200 217.663 1,OBY,9O0 1,300,063 1,V4.137 u
b Facilities Engine n"Projects,FEJ 20,ODO,ODO 750,153 1,000,000 1.750.153 18249,047
c Odor Control Pmc.ReheWRefurb.,J-71 5.337,Oo0 - 105,000 105,000 5=000
of Tunnels Struttaal Integrity and Cover Rehab.,155 426.300 43.001 378AW 421,801 4,499 1
e Chlorine Bldg Merin Egndp Demolition,J-W 210.700 27.241 175.100 202.341 8" 6d
f Information Technology Trailers AddNon,J-61 397,100 27.416 359,900 397.316 (216)
g Small Capital Equipment Replacement project 240,000 99.728 160,000 259,728 (19,728)
11. Water Management Pmjems I
a Grountlwato RePlehabnsnt System.J-36 121,924,700 797.682 2,767,400 3,565,062 118.359.638 as,
12. Plant Automation
a Plant Reimention/Aaom lion Pmjed,J42 25.760,400 2.215,658 5,49ZOOD 7.707.666 18.OR732
b Power Monitoring and Control Systems,Ja33 4.047.300 692 817,600 818282 3229.00B
SuRToat -InterplantBJoint 45Q550,800 11,904227 29,325.700 41229,927 409,320.873 led
Sub-Total - MajorProjecls 703=101) 60.927.947 65,685,800 116.613.747 588,642,353
Special Projeels
1. Prtrmry Treatment V
a Emndshn Potyment MakeEovm Lhft Upgrade 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 -
2. Solids Handling 8 Dgestion
a Beft Press Automation 175.000 8,502 173,ODO 181,502 ASIM j
b Bmsolids ClassASSng Assessment 110.000 - 110,000 110.000 - L
c Siosolids Maragement See AcquisNon 50,100 - 50,100 50,100 -
3. Safety 8 Seventy Impovements
a Sewny System Improvements 1.33ZOW 353.499 405.800 769299 553.501 I
4. Process Related Special Projects L
a Effluent Sampler Improvements 100,000 - 100,OD0 100,000 -
5. Information Management
a Automation Report Publishing 195.000 58.579 SB.00D 116,579 78,421 I
b CMMS Programming 490,000 Z71,430 198,70D 470,130 19,870 u
c Dcmmmrt Management 800,000 296.M 254,900 551,179 2311,821
d Daa Integration 4.334,000 1,651,848 1251200 2.903,048 1,430.952
e Source CoMml Programming 576,000 304.378 2DS= 510,578 65,422 I
f Strategic Into... ArehBecove(SIA) 724,000 221,807 378.70D Ill 123.493 u
g Geographic Information System 874,000 49,857 187,600 237,457 636,543
h Intranet Application Development 23SAM 74,322 58,100 132.422 103.173
1 SCADA Communications-Ethemat Study 161.900 - 161,900 161,900 j
j VoiceJDaa Bldlding Rewiring 680,100 486,903 142,100 629,003 51,097 LI
k Network Test Facility 125.000 81.459 31AM 113259 11,741
1 Year 2000 Data Change 3,465.400 1,909.688 1,355,40D 3.275268 190,112
m Windows 2000 Ops.System Upgrade Pilot 154.90D - 154.900 154.900 - 6I
n Field Fiber Optic Termnal Standardization 324,700 82,030 268,600 3%630 (M.930)
o Replacement of lntenglard Fiber Optice 498.500 - 75,400 75,400 4Z3,100
P Financial lnlametion System 2,958,000 2.307.522 509,8130 2,817,322 140,US
q Records Management Program 266.000 - 224,800 224.S00 30200 I I
y
Section 3-Page 10 I '
u
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project LUe
r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
currenrt TOM
Approved GrW99 Year P -jeched Remaining
r Project Accanulated Projected CON at Future
Budget Coat cost 930M Budget
6. Miscellaneous 8 Suppon Pmjecs
a Scrubber Cherndcal Fcetl System Mad. 812200 113,801 446,200 659,a01 252,399
r b Revision of Standard Specifications,3-44 439,700 251.425 282,200 513.625 (73.925)
c Shelviig/Avchiving 30,000 - 30.000 30.000 -
d 0"Equipment 7,91W - 7.500 7,500 -
e portable Stoage Building 9.500 - 9.500 9,501) -
r t Cman Mondoring Database-Phased 70,100 - 70.100 70,10D
g Oman Mondoning Database-Phase It 50.100 - 50,100 50,100 -
7. Strategic 8 Master Planning
a Strategic Plan-Phase3,3403 2193,700 1,051 222600 2079,701 113.999
'N b Stategic Pan Progrem FJR J-404 1,120,10D 541.714 409,500 9512t4 168.886
c Plant O 6 M Manual 8 S.O.P.Project,Phase 1 230.000 - 220,000 220,000 10,000
8. Water Managermnt Projects
a Water Consenvabon COOp-Tgdet Reto8l PgMJ-72 4,644,OOD 252102 400.000 652,102 3.991,898
r b Watemned Consultant Semms Vill - 150,000 150,000 -
9. Research 5 Development
a Special Projects M FY 1999-20DO 1.9B7AW 1245AM 1,245AM 1220024
_ Sub-Totdl Speclsl Projects 29844,SW 11,184298 10.0D0,276 21,184,522 8.659,978
Bi ulprrerd Mann 48,984 29542W 2,964�2W 46,0004000
Total Treatment 8 DkPosal Projects 78ZOKOW 72112193 68,650276 140,71 641,302,331
combucdon in Progress Competed at 6/30/99 51,1133.5010 51,933,550 (51,833.550)
r Total Collect...,Treabncnn
and Disposal Projects still W 133,814,792 92,401,500 228,216292 754,036.806
r
Section 3—Page 11
1999-00 First Quarter Report
L
L
i
u
L
L
L
J
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
L
L
u
L
u
Section 3—Page 12
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Ooeratina Budget Review
r
199900 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Dare
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
r REVENUES:
Tax AJlocatlons/Subventions(Share of l%) 32,861.000 1,920,832 30,940,166 5.85%
Connection Fees 5.187,000 447,101 4,739,899 8.62%
„r Other Fees 74.301,000 584,974 73,716,326 0.79%
Sale of Capacity Rights 198,000 - 196,000 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 26,778,000 4,096,538 22,681,462 15.30%
,r Other Fees - 15,795 (15,795) -
TotalRevenues 139,323,000 7,064.940 132.258,060 5.07%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treabnent Plant 68,771,000 7,190,508 61,580,494 10.46%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 23,629,000 3,707,023 19,921.977 15.69%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 41,690,000 17,055,534 24,634,486 40.91%
Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 44,000,000 12,009,197 31,990,813 27.29%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,356.500 1,847,259 7,509,231 19.74%
r
Total Outlays 187,446,500 41,809,519 145,636,981 22.30%
r
Coital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
r
711799 &Atlditions Fixed Assets 9/30/99
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Areas'Construction in Progress 41,359,189 3,707,023 - 45,066212
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 68,714,703 7,190,506 - 75,905209
Sub-Total 110,073,892 10.897.529 - 120,971.421
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 2,675267 - - 2,675,267
r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 302,933,274 - - 302,933.274
Treatment Facilities 19.922 - - 19,922
Disposal Facilities 101.528 - - 101,528
r General Plant and Adrdnistrative Facilities 885,732 - 855.732
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 783,840,05E - - 783,840,058
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 44,434 - - 44,434
,r Sub-Total 1,090,500.215 - - 1,090,500215
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 1200,574,107 10,897,529 - 1,211,471,636
r
Section 4-Page 1
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Revenue Area No.1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date u
Budget Date Budget %of Budget I
REVENUES: L
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) 1,859,000 388.874 1,470,126 20A2%
Connection Fees 455.000 (45) 455.045 -0.01%
Other Fees 8,410,000 11,157 8,398,843 0,13% L
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,549,000 174,932 1,374,068 11.29% 1
Other Fees - - - - L
Total Revenues 12.273,000 574,918 11.698,082 4.68%
L
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnatrnent Plant 7,661,000 797,427 6,863.573 10.41%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 32,000 14,778 17.222 46.18% L
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 5,848,000 2,159,400 3,688,600 36.93%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,699,000 1,269,768 3,429,232 27.02%
Revenue Arm Operating&08rer Expenses 599.000 163,580 435,420 27.31% L
Total Outlays 18,839,000 4,404,953 14,434,047 23.38%
L
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L
7/1199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in P - L Progress 53,575 1a,778 68,353
Share of Joint Works Trealment Plant CIP 7,620,461 797,427 - 8.417,888
Sub-Total 7,674.036 812,205 - 8,486,241
L
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 61.398 L
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 6,903,000 - - 6,903,000
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593
General Plant and Adnunistrative Facilities 58,241 - - 58,241 L
Equity in Jant Treatment Facilities 86,894,517 - - 86,894,517
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - -
Sub-Total 93,948,749 - - g3,948,749 U
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 101.622.785 812,205 - 102,434,990
L
L
Section 4 -Page 2
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Opera t na Budget Review
1999-00 Year-To Remaining Year-ToAate
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax AllarationslSuoventions(Share of l%) 10,064,000 539,334 9,524,666 5.36%
Correction Fees 2,002,000 (315,620) 2,317,620 -15.77°h
,r OBmr Fees 23,910,000 354,599 23,555,401 148%
Sale of Cape*Rights 148,000 - 148,000 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 8,181,000 1,283,683 6,897,317 15.69%
r Other Fees - 15,051 (15,051) -
Total Revenues 44,305,000 1,877,047 42,427,953 4.241/6
r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint N6rks Treatment Plant 20,150,000 2,138,455 18,01116" 10.61%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construrbm 3,827,000 577,091 3,241 1508%
r COP/Bond Relionerd and lydenst Experse 13,188,000 5,797,912 7,390,088 43.96%
Share of Joint Woks Operating Eqeenses 13,737,000 3,871,895 9,865.105 28.19%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,688,000 549,163 2,138,847 20A3%
Total Outlays 53,590,000 12,934,507 40,655,493 24.14%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress 2,484,196 577.091 - 3,061,287
Share of Joint Works Treatrnent Plant CIP 20,435,753 2,138,456 - 22,574.209
SubTotal 22,919.949 2,715,547 - 25,635,4%
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and property Rights 517,694 - - 517,694
r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 96,923,040 - 96,9M.040
Treahrcrd Facilities - '
Cispoeal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172
r General Plant and Adrdr strative Facilities 218,549 - 218,60
Equity in Joint Treatrrerd Facilities 233,024,296 - - 233,024298
Ot er Assets at Cost less Amortization 1,125 1.125
Sub-Total 330,717,876 - - 330,717,876
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 353,637,825 2,715,547 - 356,353,372
r
r
Section 4-Page 3
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report
L
Revenue Area No.3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review L l
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Yr
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: L
Tax Alloraeons/Subventions(Sham of l%) 10,902,000 528.673 10,373,327 4A5%
Connection Fees 1,274,000 139,293 1,134,707 10.93%
Other Fees 23,013,000 86,618 22,926,382 0.38% L
Sale of Capacity Rights _ - - _
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 8,447,000 1,382,874 7,064,126 16.37% 1
Other Fees - - - - L
Total Revenues 43,636,000 2,137,458 41.498.542 4.90%
L
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 21,292,000 2,216,114 19,075,11M 10.41%
Revenue Area Trunk Serer Construction 8,810.000 2,254,052 6,525.938 25.93% L
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 12.393.000 5,194.328 7,198,674 41.91%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,196,000 3,505,605 9.690,395 26.57%
Revue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,349,000 392.713 1,956,287 16.72% L
Total Outlays 58,040,000 13,592,820 44,447,180 23.42%
L
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adusbnents Transfer to Balance L
711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress 12.323.104 2.284,062 - 14,607,168 L
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 21,177,871 2.216.114 - 23.393,985
Sub-Total 33,500,975 4,500,176 - 38,001.151 j
6.1
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 280,231 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 70,577,818 - - 70,577,818 L
Treatment Facilities 919M - - 9,M2
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28419
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 320,153 - - 320:153 u
Equity in Joint Treatrent Facilities 241,486,220 - - 241,488,220
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization _
Sub-Total 312,702,763 - - 312,702,763 V
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 346,203,738 4,500,176 - 350,703,914
II
L
Section 4- Page 4
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operatna Budget Review
r
1999-00 YearTo- Remaining Year-TcOae
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
r REVENUES:
Tax AllocafiordSubventions(Sham of 1%) 3,014,000 146,123 2,867,877 4.85%
Connection Fees 364,000 2,242 361,758 0.62%
,r 09W Fees 2,482,000 - Z46Z000 0.00%
Sale of Capacity Rights _ _ - _
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,724,000 305,729 1,418,271 17.73%
r (Other Fees _ _ _ _
Total Revenues 7,564,000 454,094 7,109,906 6.OD%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Woft Treatrrent Plant 2,785,OOD 290,496 2,494,504 10.43%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 1,615,000 287,475 1,327,525 17.80%
r COP/Band Refirement and Interest Expense 1,820,000 1.093,444 726,556 60.08%
Share of Joint Waft Operating Expenses 1,734,000 490,926 1,243,074 28.31%
r Revenue Am Operating&Other Expenses 890,500 146,474 744,026 16.45%
Total Outlays 8,844,500 2.308,815 6,535.685 26.10%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjusbreft Transfer to Balance
7/1199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r Pe nue Area Constriction in Progress 4,907,830 287,475 - 5,195,305
Share of Joint Wurks Treabrerd Plant OF 2,776,074 290.496 - 3,066,570
Sub-Total 7,683,904 577,971 - 8,261,875
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Properly Rights 69,740 - - 69,740
r Collection tines grid Punp Stations 34,299,567 - - 34,299,567
Treahnent Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347
Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115
r 0eneml Plant and Adn it istralim Facilities 39,402 - 39,402
Equity in Joint Treatrnent Facilities 31,655,177 - - 31,655.177
Other Assets at Cost Less Arrodiza8on _ _ _ -
Sub-Total 66,078,348 - - 66,078,348
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 73,762,252 577.971 - 74,340.223
r
Section 4-Page 5
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Revenue Area No.6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review y
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-Tom Li
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: 11.'I
Tax Allorations/Subventons(Sham of l%) 1382,000 60,315 1,321.685 4.36%
Connection Fees 91,000 12,149 78,851 13.359% t
Other Fees 3,593,000 25,418 3,567,582 0.71% L
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&N4soellaneous Receipts 1,481,000 222,395 1,258,605 15.02%
Other Fees - 175 (175) -
Total Revenues S547,000 320,452 6,226.548 4.89%
V
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Woft Treatment Plant 2,558,000 266,049 2,291,951 10.40%
Revenue Area Trunk Sevxr Construction 923.000 142,897 780,103 15.48% L
COPMond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,457,000 647,201 809,799 44.42%
Share of Jam V%bft Operating Expenses 1,742,000 501,811 1,240.189 28.81%
Revenue Area Operatrg&Other Expenses 262,500 66,362 196,138 25.28% L
Total Outlays 6,942,500 1,624,320 5,318,180 23.40%
Id
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustrrents Transterto Balance
L
711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: f
Revenue Area Construction in Progress 6,603.8-12 142.897 - 6,746,769 y
Steve of Jdnt Mft Treahrent Rant CIP 2,542.444 266.049 - 2.808.493
Sub-Total 9,146,316 408,946 - 9,555,262 V
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rghts 562 - - 582
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 5,153,761 - - 5,153,761 L.r
Treatment Facilities 2,653 - - Z653
Disposal Facilities 7,394 - - 7,394
General Rant and Adninishative Facilities 113,761 - - 113,761 y
Equity in Joint Treahrent Facilities 28,991,098 - - 28,991.098
Other Assets at Cost Less Armdvation _ _ _ _
Sub-Total 34,269,229 - - 34,289,229
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 43,415.50 408,946 - 43.824.491
L
L
Section 4-Page 8
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review
d 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
,r REVENUES:
Tax AlloptiorslSuhrventions(Share of l%) 3,293,000 147,150 3,145,850 4ArA
Connection Fees 384,000 170,412 193,588 46.ffi%
r Other Fees 7,367A00 77,534 7,289,488 1.050/0
Sale of(ape*Right - - - -
Interest&Msodlaravus Receipts 2,170,WD 274,350 1,895,620 12.649%
r Other Fees - 569 (589) -
Total Revenues 13,194,000 670,045 12,523,955 E08%
r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joird Wake Treatrrmt Plant 7,180,000 746,375 6,433.625 10.4(r/
r, Revenue Area Tau&Sewer Construction 2,156,000 245,325 1,910,674 11.38%
COPIBond RedrertleM and Interest Expense 3,577,000 1,1611053 2,415,347 32.489/
Share of Joint Nbdrs Operating Expenses 4,488,000 1,199,014 3,288,SW 26.729/6
r, Revenue Am Operating&Other Eqensas 1,422,500 285,659 1,136.831 20.08%
Total Outlays 18,823,500 3,638,037 15,185,463 19.33%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjustments Trarsferto Balance
T11f99 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r Revenue Am Construction in Progress 6,940,555 245,326 - 7,185,881
Share of Joint Ndks Treatrent Plats CIP 7,132,586 746,375 - 7,878,961
Sub•Total 14,073,141 991,701 - 15,064,842
r
CONPLEIED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQ IPNENT:
Land and Properly Ri" 1,578,656 - - 1,678,658
Collection lines and Pump Stations 41,248,462 - - 41,248,462
Treetrywrt Facilities - - - -
DisposalFacilities 10,782 - - 10,782
r General Plat and Admnistrative Facilities 98,197 - - 98,197
Equity In Joint Treatment Failities 81,331,301 - - 81,331,301
Other Assets at Cost Less Anortizalion 43,309 - - 43,309
r
Sub-Total 124,310,707 - - 124,310,707
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 138,383,848 991,701 - 139,375,549
r
r
Section 4- Page 7
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report 61
Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: y
Tax Allocabons/Subvendons(Share of 1%) 2,347,000 110,363 2.236,637 4.70%
Connection Fees 364,000 277.246 86,754 76.17%
Other Fees 4.693,000 27,297 4,665,703 0.58
Sale of Cape*Rights 48.000 - 48,000 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 1,810,000 267.908 1,542,092 14.80% 1 �
Other Fees - - - - G
Total Revenues 9,282,000 682.814 8,579,186 7.37%
i
OUTLAYS: v
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 4,539,000 468,102 4,070,898 10,31%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,280,000 166,394 6,104,606 2.48%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,220.000 927.506 2,292.494 28.80%
Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,688,000 723,327 1,964,673 26.91%
Revenue Area Opemting&Other Expenses 904.500 198.502 705,998 21.95% L
Total Outlays 17,611,500 2,472,831 15,138,669 14.04%
L
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Tmnsferto Balance L
711199 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/99
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construclion in Progress 7.996,081 155,394 - 8,151,475 L
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 4,473,327 468,102 - 4,941,429
Sub-Total 12.469,408 623.496 - 13,092,904
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986
Collection Unes and Pump Stations 19,050,027 - - 19,050,027 L
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 I
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 30,682 - - 30,682 L
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 51,008,485 - - 51,008,485
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - -
Sub-Total 70,239.233 - - 70,239,233 u
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 82.708,641 623,496 - 83,332,137
L
11
u
Section 4- Page 8
V
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review
r
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Dale Budget %of Budget
r REVENUES:
Tax AllocetionsrSubventions(Share of l%) - - - -
Connection Fees 273,000 161,424 111,576 59.13%
r Other Fees 853,000 - 853,000 0.00%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 732.000 129,902 602,098 17751%
r Other Fees - - _ _
Total Revenues 1,a58,000 291,326 1,566,674 15.68%
r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant 818.000 85,567 732,433 10.46%
r
Revenue Area Trunk Serer Construction - - - 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 10,766 16,234 39.87%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 532,000 146,951 385,049 2T629%
r, Revenue Am Operating&Other Expenses 27,000 10,024 16,976 37.13%
Total Outlays 1,404,000 253.308 1,150,692 18.04%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711199 &Additiore Fixed Assets 9130199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r. Revenue Area Construction in Progress - - - -
Sham of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 817,705 85.567 - 903,272
Sub-Total 817,705 85,567 - 903.272
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights - _ - _
r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3,175,032 - - 3,175,032
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - -
..' General Plant and Administrative Facilities - - - -
Equity in Joint TreabrentFacilities 9,324,069 - - 9,324,069
Other Assets at Cost Less Anprtization - _ _ -
r' Sub-Total 12,499,101 - - 12,499.101
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 13,316,806 85,567 - 13,402,373
r
r
Section 4-Page 9
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1999
Operating Budget Review L
1999410 Ybar-To- Remaining Ymr4p4kb t�
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: L
Tax AllocationslSubventiors(Share of 1%) - - - -
Connection Fees - - - -
OfirerFees - 2,051 (2,051) - u
Sale of Capacity Rights _ _ _ _
Interest&Miscellaneous Receipts 684,000 54,735 629,265 8.00%
Other Fees - - - -
Total Revenues 684,000 56,786 627,214 8.30%
OUTLAYS: L
Share of Jolts Works Treatment Plant 1,788,000 181,920 1.606,080 10.17%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,000 - 6,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 160.000 63.326 95.674 39.58% r
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,184,000 299,890 884,110 25.33%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 213,500 34,792 178,708 16.30%
Total Outlays 3,351,5C0 579,928 2,771,572 17.30%
L
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
V
7/1/99 &Additiore Fixed Asses 9/30199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Arm Construction in Progress 49,976 - - 49,976 V
Share of Joint Works Treament Plant CIP 1,738,482 181.920 - 1,920,402
Sub-Total 1,788.458 181,920 - 1,970,378
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: L
Land and Property Rights _ _
Collection Lines and Purrg Stations 25,602,567 - - 25,602.567 6.
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Piant and Administrative Facilities 6,747 - - 6,747 L
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 20,124,895 - - 20,124,895
Other Assets at Cost Less AmoNzation _ _ _ _
Sub-Total 45,734,209 - - 45,734,209 b
Tool Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 47,522,667 181,920 - 47,704,587
L
4.1
Section 4-Page 10
L
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1299-00 Through Through 1999-00 Through Increase
Budget 9/30199 9130199 Budget 9130198 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves- 1,981,193 1,592,701 2,059.473 (466,772)
r
Revenues
2. In-Lieu Premiums - - N/A - - -
3. Interest&Miscellaneous 100,000 19,120 19.12% 80,880 31,546 (12,426)
4. Allocation from Other Funds 700,000 62,667 8.95% 637,333 2.833 59,834
r 6. Total Revenues 800,000 81,787 10.22% 718,213 34,379 47.408
r
Expenses
S. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - WA - - -
r
7. Benefits/Claims 165,000 11,446 6.94% 153,555 - 11.445
r 8. Contractual Services 3,500 300 8.67% 3,200 - 300
9. Legal Services 500,000 137,146 27.43% 362,854 69,949 67,197
�r 10. Professional Services 3,000 12,000 400.00% (9,000) - 12,000
11. Supplies&Other 500 0.00% 500
12. Sub-Total Expenses 672,000 160,891 23.94% 511,109 69,949 90.942
13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 27,873 23.23% 92,127 27,873
r
14. Total Expenses 792,000 188,764 23.83% 603.236 97,822 90.942
r
15. Excess Revenue(Expenses 8,000 (108.877) -1337.21% 114,977 (83,443) (43,534)
r 16. Ending Reserves* 1,989,193 1.485,724 74.69% N/A 1,996,030 (510,306)
`+ •Includes$687,313 long term receivable due from the County of Orange.
r
r
Section 5-Page 1
r
1999-00 First Quarter Report L
Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review L
For the Three Months Ended September 30,1999
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual �+
199940 Through Through 1999-00 Through Increase
Budget W30199 9130199 Budget 9130198 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves* 520.052 812,383 563,272 249,111 V
Revenues
V
2. In-Lieu Premiums 310,000 77,500 25.00% 232,500 54,750 22,750
3. Interest&Miscellaneous 25,000 9,836 39.34% 15,164 7,990 1,846
4. Total Revenues 335,000 87,336 26.07% 247,664 62,740 24,596 y
V
Expenses
5. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - WA - - - W
6. BenefdslClaims 225,000 86,567 38.47% 138,433 66,710 19,857
7. Contractual Services 25,000 6,250 25.00% 18,750 - 8,250
S. Legal Services 27,000 5,047 18.69% 21,953 4,863 184
u
9. Professional Services 30,000 25,636 85A5% 4.364 - 25.636
10. Supplies&Other - - WA 583 (583)
�.i
11. Sub-Total Expenses 307,000 123,600 40.23% 183,500 72,156 51,344
12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 5,024 22.33% 17,476 5,430 (406)
13. Total Expenses 329,500 128,524 39.01% 200.976 77.586 50,933 1i
14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 5,500 (41.188) -748.87% 46,688 (14,846) (26,342) L.
V
15. Ending Reserves' 525,552 771,195 146.74% WA 548,426 222,769
V
Includes$139,231 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. L
L
Section 5- Page 2
1
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
General Management Administration (Division 110)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Ensure treatment cost does S483WG S544/%iG Costs above Gallonage charge due to lower
not exceed target by end of than anticipated flows and unexpected
fiscal year expenditures related to the Huntington
Beach Closure Project.
Ensure District meets 517.25 FTEs by 497.75 FTEs As of 9/30199.
adopted 3-year staffing end of fiscal year
plan
Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
with Permit Compliance
Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 10% Expenditures well under target through four-
(capital projects)CORE quarters and related to many projects being
Budget by end of year in Design phase. See Engineering Section.
_ Ensure District Performance 80% 75%Performance Performance objectives have ready been met
Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives during the first three months. Workplan
milestones met within Objectives 64%Workplan milestone tasks are behind in some areas,
targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see largely due to continued Y2K efforts and the
Milestones Summary) Huntington Beach Closure Project. Note that
with GM approval,a few scheduled workplan
tasks were delayed to next fiscal year given
appropriate justification.
District-Wide Workplan Not
Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
First Quarter
77 49 24 4 64%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled
for first quarter of FY 99/00 were completed.
A few of these tasks were deferred per the
General Manager. Please see individual
division sections for additional details on
activities behind schedule.
Section 6 -Page 1
1999-00 First Quarter Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Administration (Division 210) -
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Average Rate of Return 4.78% 5.43% The portfolios outperformed their respective
on Liquid Portfolio Index benchmarks. _
Average Rate of Return 4.54% 4.87% The portfolios outperformed their respective
on Long-temp Portfolio benchmarks.
Index _
Average Interest Rate 2.72% 2.71% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met.
Paid on variable(COP)
Borrowing
General liability cost:% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met.
Premiums compared to .60% .25%
Operating Budget _
Workers Comp insurance
cost: %premiums 1.50% 1.03% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met.
compared to Payroll
Remain at or under the $44.0 Million by $12 Million over 3 Expenses exceeded 25%'quarterly target"
net Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal months(27%total) largely due to the unanticipated expenses _
year associated with the Huntington Beach Closure
Project. We will attempt to compensate for these
unexpected costs over the next 3 quarters.
Workplan Tasks
Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6 - Page 2
Performance Objectives
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Accounting (Division 220)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Issue monthly financial First month(July) missed which is typical
reports within 10 working 92% 67% due to end-of-year processing. We expect
days this to be the only month behind schedule.
Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 0% This work to be completed in 2nd and 3rd
study quarter.
Complete Policy and 100%by year end 10% 10%progress with expectation of
Procedures Manual completion by years end.
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6 - Page 3
1999-00 First Quarter Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) -
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through Months
Maintain cycle count 97/+Accuracy 98.31% Full-year cycle counting program met
program Rating benchmark target. _
Complete by Not started Will be completed by 4th Quarter.
Implement Outreach 4/00
Program
Implement Procurement Complete by Pilot Program Pilot program initiated.
Card Program 2/00
Develop Master Contracts Complete by Initiated Project Contracts currently under tlevelopment.
for consultants/services 3/00
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data —
6 3 g 0 Unexpected retirement of O&M division-
head delayed start of tasks.
Section 6- Page 4
Performance Objectives
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT
Communications (Division 310)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target achieved,
Turnaround Time 100%of time
Board Minute Preparation 10 day 100% Target achieved.
Turnaround Time turnaround
100%of time
Photocopying Services 93%+ N/A 1 st and 3rd Quarter measurement.
Satisfaction
Graphics Services 95%* WA 1 St and 3rd Quarter measurement.
Satisfaction
Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%t 95% Benchmark target exceeded.
Rating
Workplan Tasks - - N -
1"Quarter complete Behind moot o, Summary of Data -
2 1 0 1 Have not formed special in-house cemminee.
Section 6- Page 5
1999-00 First Quarter Report
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 4201430") --
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Summary of Data .�
Months
Ensure contractor performs 80%-100%of 59%(142,000 ft) Contractor missed work days due to _
within contract guidelines 244,800 linear ft. equipment failures,personnel shortages and
for Zone 7line cleaning multiple commitments. Contractor
reorganizing and dedicating two trucks to get
back on schedule.
Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench lime 93% Target exceeded.
Pump Stations meets or
exceeds target
Ensure that collections go%+spots 57% Staff re-directed to Huntington Beach Closure
trouble spots are cleaned on Project.
maintained on schedule schedule
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 77% Target met.
Fleet Maintenance Division
meets or exceeds target
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 92o Target exceeded.
Rebuild Shop meets or _
exceeds target
Ensure planned/preventive 75%Planned& 78%Preventive Target met.
maintenance to corrective Preventive 22%Corrective
maintenance ratios meets Maintenance
targets 25%Corective
Maintenance
Workplan Tasks Not - —
11^Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
6 3 3 0 Delays on tasks due to Huntington Beach
Project and other project complications.
*Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6 -Page 6
Performance Objectives
HR & EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 510)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Address employee 90%within 3 97% Target exceeded.
development requests days
HR Department managed 90-100%of 25%expended through Target met.
within budget budget 3 months
.. Achieve 3-year staffing plan 517.25 FTFs by 497.75 FTE's through 3 This is well below our end-of-year target.
projections years end months
Ensure Department 90% 100% Target met.
achieves 90,of budget
performance objectives
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Starred Summary of Data
6 6 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6-Page 7
1999-00 First Quarter Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Technical Services Administration (Division 610) _
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Summary of Data
Months
Ensure divisions' 85%+ 81%(13 of 16) Approaches benchmark target.
performance objectives are
met.
Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 68-120% Division: 610-68%;620-111%; 630—
expenditures are managed (annualized) 120%;640-101%;650-80%. Anticipate
all budgets will be met by year's end.
Grltpl.lf�eX'�8k8ai ixk �J � .h
'SQitarter 7 a.= Complete'+ 8ehlnd a .r yk Y Summary of Data
1 0 1 0
Modified approach and Scope of Work to
internal operations study.
Section 6- Page 8
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Summary of Data
Months
Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target met.
core ocean monitoring
sampling
Ensure workplan project 95%of Deadlines 100% Target met.
milestones completed on
time.
Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met.
reports/data submitted on
time
Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met.
reported on time.
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 3 0 0
Workplan tasks completed_
Section 6- Page 9
1999-00 First Quarter Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data —'
Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 127% Target exceeded. 290 tests/FTE/month
testing productivity at/above exceeds target of 229 based on benchmark. _
Multi-agency benchmark
parameters.
Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 114% Target exceeded. 290 tests/FTE/momh
testing productivity wilhin none exceeds target of 255 based on last year.
10%of FY 98/99 in-house
productivity standard.
Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 100%on 1st analysis Target met. 2nd QA analysis not completed
on laboratory samples 1st analysis; until 11199.
100%on 2nd
Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 90.3% Internal standards established in November,
analyses established '98. Turnaround times standard met.
norm
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
r
Section 6 -Page 10
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source Control(Division 640)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data '-^ -
Maintain field inspection 2-6 monitoring 2.8 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note,
productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods
data is for 4th quarter of FY 98199.
Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal.
actions within 30 days of
non-compliance event
Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal.
permits prior to expiration
Implement Technical Complete 90+ 80%completed Program slightly behind schedule due to
Resource Program of milestones on delay in EPA's review.
time
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 1 1 0 Detailed review of draft ordinance behind
schedule due to EPA delays.
Section 6- Page 11
1999-00 First Quarter Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Safety & Emergency Response (Division 650)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 96% Customer Service remains a division
within 2 work days prionty.
Ensure Injury Incidence is 8.5 incidence 11.3 This target has not been met due to an
24%below industry rate increase in frequency of less severe
average accidents. Additional emphasis being
provided on"safe work practices.'
Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 5.6 This target has not been met due to an
Incidence Rate 42%below rate increase in frequency of accidents
industry average requiring time off. Additional emphasis
being provided on'safe work practices'
Workers Compensation $403 $21 Costs were negligible due to accidents that `.
Cost Factor 30%below did occur requiring limited medical cost
industry average payments.
Workplan Tasks Not
111 Quarter Complete Behlod Started Summary.of Data
5 5 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6- Page 12
Performance Objectives
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
(Division 7101720')
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Manage Capital Projects 80%+ 1D% Due to many projects residing in"less
CORF Budget expended by expensive"design phase,expenditures will
year's end be higher in later quarters.
Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 83% 5/6 projects bid on schedule.
established Capital
Improvement Program
schedule
Meet design project 80%+of time 84% Target met. 41/49 milestones either met or
milestones officially moved due to increased project
scope.
Meet Division 710020 JO Less than 29.39%nio Increase in 710 due to unexpected
budgets 100% 24.8o%n20 expenditures related to Huntington Beach
expended Closure Project.
Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The District has responded to 14/14 inquiries
correspondence within 30 within 30 days.
working days
Workplan Tasks Not
1" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
8 3 5 0 Various manuals and written P&P behind
schedule.
'Note that Engineering Admin. and Planning &Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 13
1999-00 First Quarter Report
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Construction Management(Division 730) _
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 3 Months —
Target Change Order costs 5% 4.28% Change order costs are always based on a
at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four
original contract amount quarters. Target has been met. —
(industry standard=7.25%)
Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 50%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a _
Occupancy in facilities days 50%-240 days running average of the preceding four
within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target was not achieved
days based on the rolling average utilizing 10
projects.
Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 3.80% Target has been met based on QC
Inspections and average no inspections.
more 10%correctable
tleficiencies
Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 96% Target has been exceeded.
within 20 days greater
Meet Division 730 JO Less than 100% 24.27% Target met.
budgets expended
Workplan Tasks Not
1^Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
7 2 3 2 Various manuals and written P&P behind —
schedule.
Section 6 - Page 14
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Administration (Division 810)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Ensure Operations $308/million $324/million gallons Exceedence due to non-recurring costs
treatment cost per million gallons treated treated and natural gas costs which will be
gallons does not exceed averaged throughout year.
target
.. Ensure O&M division 96.100% 101.1% (annualized) See above comment.
budgets managed within
appropriated expenditures
Ensure Total Injury 16.3 13.89 Target met.
Frequency Rate 25%or (or less)
more below industry
average
Ensure three-year staffing 206.25 FTEs by 202.5 FfEs Target met.
plan figures are met end of year
r Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
r
r
Section 6- Page 15
1999-00 First Quarter Report y
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Operations & Maintenance Processing Support (Divisions 820/870')
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Ensure utility, chemical, 90%-100% Total contracts Natural gas expenses increased contracts
biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 100.8%for slightly above target. _
contracts are managed 3 month period
within budget (annualized).
Ensure milestones are 80%+of time -80% Project milestones met.
completed on assigned
projects
Respond to Engineering 90%within -90% Target met.
Capital Project Review deadline
Requests
Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.028 Overhead rates for charges related to
kilowatt hour($/kWh) CenGen were lowered due to reallocation
thus positively impacting$/KWh.
Maintain theroi at .111 thernslkWh .102 therns/kWh- Within targeted parameters.
Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1
(kilowatt hour)within .106therms1kWh .1o8thenms/kWh-
targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant
Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 69% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit
Central Generation plants requirements.
within targeted limits
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
7 6 1 0 Portion of final multi-agency benchmark
report to complete.
'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 16
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 830/840)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Summary of Data
Months
Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 76% Plant 1 Target met.
Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 73%Plant 2
Process
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 43%Plant 1 Problems with emulsion
(BOD)Removal Targets in Primary 43%>at Plant 2 41%Plant 2 polymers and repairs on
Treatment Process Primary Basin J impacted Plant
1 and 2,respectively.
Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 21%Plant 1 Within targeted parameters.
total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 23%Plant 2
targets 5 hours leave
taken)
25%at Plant
Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.2%Plant 1 See above.
does not exceed targets salary 2.0%Plant 2
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
4 2 0 2 Delays pending negotiations
resolution and finalizing Y2K
projects.
Section 6 - Page 17
1999-00 First Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860) .—
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 3 Months Summary of Data
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 43% Commitment to project-related activities.
Time in Mechanical particularly Y21K,reduces direct wrench time
Maintenance Division percentages.
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 41% Commitment to project-related activities,
Time in Electrical& particularly Y21K,reduces direct wrench time
Instrumentation Division percentages.
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54%
Time/Direct Support Time Target met.
in Mechanical Maintenance
Division
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54% Target met.
Time/Direct Support Time
in Electrical&
Instrumentation Division
Ensure preventive <90% 62% Target met.
maintenance backlog in
Mechanical Maintenance is _
less than 1 DO%
Ensure preventive <90% 57% Target met.
maintenance backlog in _
Electrical&Instrumentation
is less than 100%
Workplan Tasks Not
1"Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
10 5 5 0 A few projects related to equipment
identification slightly behind schedule.
Section 6- Page 18
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Air Quality &Special Projects (Division 880)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Through
Target 3 Months Summary of Data
Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target.
deadlines
Ensure collections sulfide 80-100% On track Performance objective is on target.
control managed within
budget
Ensure PSA/contractual 80-100% On track Performance objective is on target.
services managed within
budget
Workplan Tasks Not
1�^Quarto ,u -Corgplate ' Behind Stanid Summary,of Data
3 2 1 0 Limited consultant resources has placed
one project behind schedule.
Section 6- Page 19
1999-00 First Quarter Report
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 910I93019401950•)
Performance Objective 199mo Performance
Target Through 3 Months Summary of Data
-
Resolve all help desk calls 75%within 3 70% Some calls have resulted in longer term
days commitments thus bring down average.
Plant radio, PBX and 98%+ Radio=100% Targets met,
Network"Up-time' PBX=100%
Network=99.98%
Database "Up-time' 95%+ 99.86% Target met.
Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met.
"Up-time" plants 100%=Plant 2
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
7 3 2 2 Cancellation of FIS OneWond upgrade
and delay in two other projects.
`Note that Information Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 20
Orange County Sanitation District
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
OCSD 9/30/99