HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-10-27 CORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
October21, 1999
paena:
17141 9 62-2411
calling allergist NOTICE OF MEETING
PC. Bae8121
Founc3Valley,CA
2728-812] BOARD OF DIRECTORS
".a aEereaa: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 Ellie Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA
9210E-7018 WEDNESDAY, October 27, 1999 — 7:00 P.M.
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
ayene.c Fountain Valley, California 92708
•
Cities
Anaheim
Brae The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
Buena Perk District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
HununBton Beech
ine
La Pe rd Secretor
L.Peen.
Lee AIaision
Newport Fission
Cnge
Placetontia
Santa Ana Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Vigo Park JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
Yore. ❑nde SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, October 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.
county or orange @OCWD
sanitary Districts STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 27, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
costa Moss OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 3, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Midway City
water Districts PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 4, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Irvine Flanch
FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 10, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 17, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
"To Protect the Pubbc Huu,,one me En. Wastewater Syetams-
S?
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
October October 27, 1999
November *November 17, 1999
December `December 15, 1999
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
April April 26, 2000
May May 24, 2000
June June 28, 2000
July 'July 19, 2000
August August 23, 2000
September September 27, 2000
October October 25, 2000
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
H1wy.dt8\ ftnXBS%ge \1999 MOWDV NoticaWW 0.2. o
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 27, 1999 — 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
r
10/27/99 r
Page 2
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
September 22, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the
Chair.
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/99 09/30/99
Totals $7,114,774.38 $4,260,360.77
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent
Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
1on7/99
Page 3
•, NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re October 27, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO
ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering
Committee Minutes for the Combined Steering Committee and Ad Hoc
Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on September 22,
1999 to be filed.
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re October 6, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 6, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve recommendation to donate surplus lab equipment and supplies
to the University of California, Irvine for use by Dr. Betty Olson, with an
estimated value of$5.500.
d. 1) Authorize staff to negotiate and enter into a 10-year agreement with
The Yakima Company for the management of the District's biosolids, in an
amount to be determined prior to District's October board meeting; and 2)
authorize staff to negotiate with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for the purchase of a
site for long-term management of the District's biosolids.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
October 7, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES-
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
October 7, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Orange
County Flood Control District for construction costs associated with the
relocation of the sewer line for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
Improvement, Contract No. 11-17-2, for an additional amount of$200,481.22,
increasing the total amount not to exceed $325,481.22.
d. 1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. B-12, with
Mike Priich & Sons, authorizing an addition of$96,969, increasing the total
contract amount to$2,489,765; 2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Fairview Relief
Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, with Mike Pdich & Sons, authorizing a deduction of
$99,750, decreasing the total contract amount to $2,390,015; and 3) Accept
Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, as complete, authorizing execution of
the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
10/27/99
Page 4
e. 1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,107,320 for Goldenwest Street Trunk
Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, for a total project budget of
$5,027,720; 2) Approve a budget amendment of$256,852 for Heil Avenue
Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for a total project budget of$4,329,752; 3)
Approve plans and specifications for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No.
11-20; 4) Approve Addenda Nos. 1'and 2 to the plans and specifications; 5)
Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 6) Award contract to
Ken Thompson, Inc., for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement,
Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for an
amount not to exceed $6,325.000.
f. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC
Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment
Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, providing for additional engineering services for
an additional amount of$229,187, increasing the total contract amount not to
exceed $2,350,935.
g. Approve a budget amendment of$6,069.661 to Area Classification Studies
Implementation Plan, Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, for a revised total
project cost of$7,214.661.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re October 13, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 13, 1999 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 1999.
d. Ratify the decision of the General Manager and authorize him to waive the
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC), pursuant to District's Ordinance
No. OCS099-01, Section 305.6, regarding issuance of the Special Purpose
Discharge Permits to the City of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to
allow urban runoff to be discharged to the District's wastewater system for a
one-year period effective November 1, 1999.
e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-18, Amending Human Resources Policies and
Procedures, Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Relating tot)Adjust the Assistant
General Manager's pay range (E20) maximum from $136,680 to $148,836; 2)
Move the Director of Information Technology classification from pay range E17
($75,876-$119,784) to pay range E18 ($85,992-$139,464); 3) Move the
Warehouse Supervisor classification from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236) to
pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156); 4) Move the Contracts & Purchasing
Supervisor classification from pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156) to pay range
E11 ($60,828-$86,064); 5) Create Contracts Specialist classification at pay
range E2 ($39,252-$55,488); 6) Create Contracts Administrator classification at
pay range E7 ($50,064-$70,848); 7) Reinstate the Safety and Emergency
Response Specialist classification at pay range E8 ($52,500-$74,292); and 8)
10/27/99
Page 5
Create Information Technology Strategic Implementation Leader classification at
pay range E11 ($60,828-$86,054).
15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re September 28 and October 12, 1999 meetings.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meetings held on September 28 and October 12,
1999 to be filed.
16. 1) Approve plans and specifications for Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1
&2, Job No. J-55; 2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications;
3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a contract to
Ararat Construction Co., Inc. dba Ark Construction Co. for Tunnel Structural
Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-55, for an amount not to exceed $243,000.
17. Actions re Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan,
prepared by Environmental Science Associates:
a. Verbal staff report
b. Receive and file written comments.
C. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999
Strategic Plan.
d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-19, Making Certain Findings Relative to
Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental
Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan; adopting a Statement of Overriding
Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination.
e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-20, Certifying the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan has been completed in compliance
with CEQA.
f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-21 adopting the 1999 Strategic Plan and
designating Scenario 2, the "Preferred Alternative"as the District's new
treatment operational plan.
9. Direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination
10/27/99
Page 6
18.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At sugh time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Status Report of General Counsel re proposed litigation: OCSD v.
County of Kem, at al. (Government Code Section 54956.9).
2. Confer with General Counsel re Colich Brothers, Inc. v. OCSD, Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 806799 (Government Code Section
54956.9).
3. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development
Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)).
4. Confer with District's Negotiator and give direction re all Employee
Bargaining Units (Government Code Section 54957.6).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
19. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
22. Adjournments
10/27/99
Page 7
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of
business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
H,Wp Ma\agenEaGwo Age s\1999 Board AgeMs\10I199.tl
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.orD r.
Ion m
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Numbr
v
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Project Manager
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-4
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of the following actions regarding Certification of the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the1999 Strategic Plan:
a. Verbal staff report.
b. Receive and file written comments.
C. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for
the 1999 Strategic Plan.
d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-19, Making Certain Findings
Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft
Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan;
adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and authorizing the
filing of a Notice of Determination.
e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-20, Certifying the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan has been
completed in compliance with CEQA.
f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-21 adopting the 1999 Strategic
Plan and designating Scenario 2, the "Preferred Alternative" as the
District's new treatment operational plan.
g. Direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination
SUMMARY
This item is the certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR) for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan will replace the 1989
Master Plan with a revised operational plan and capital improvement program
through 2020. Certification of the EIR is required, prior to implementation of the
"Preferred Alternative". The"Preferred Alternative" includes:
• Upsize collection system
Page 1
• Provide level of treatment to meet requirements of 1998 Ocean Discharge r
Permit
• Participate in Phase 1 of the GWR System
• Use in-plant storage to mitigate peak flows
• Rely on 78-inch outfall for emergency discharge (once every 3 years in 2020)
• Pursue water conservation and inflow/infiltration reduction
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem:)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District has completed the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for
the 1999 Strategic Plan as required by the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The Draft Program EIR was circulated for public comment for 48 days
(45 days required by CEQA), and the comment period closed August 16, 1999.
Within the public review period, a public hearing was conducted by the Board of
Directors on July 21,1999, at which time, three members of the public spoke.
Twenty-three written comments were received from individuals, interest groups,
and public agencies throughout the comment period. Responses to the three
oral comments received at the public hearing and the 23 written comments have
been prepared and included in the Final EIR. The Final EIR was circulated on
October 5, 1999, to all that received the Draft EIR, or had made written and/or
oral comments. The Board of Directors received the Draft Program EIR at the
September 22 Board Meeting and the Final EIR was mailed by separate letter in
early October (If a Director needs an additional copy of either the Draft or Final
EIR, please contact Jim Herberg, 714-593-7310). CEQA requires a ten-day
circulation of the Final EIR. As of this writing, we have not received any
comments on the Final EIR; if any comments are received, they will be reported
at the October 27 meeting.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Item "b, c, and d° in the General Manager's Recommendation in this report
includes the CEQA Actions for this project.
Page 2
yr ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. OCSD 99-19 (with Attachment "A, B, and C)
Resolution No. OCSD 99-20
Resolution No. OCSD 99-21
AA:
WadonWatat%vp.dta%agenda%Boara Agenda RepuNaN BBB Board Agenda RepoMtt gB9Vtem 17AM
Page 3
v
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-19
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL
PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN;
ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM: ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS: AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR THE DRAFT PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN ("THE PROJECT"); ADOPTING
A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM;
ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS; AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD), hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval of the
1999 Strategic Plan, a master plan for new facilities through the year 2020, herein
referred as the Strategic Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the District is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Strategic Plan, pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA
Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the Strategic Plan's environmental impacts objectively, the
District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and altematives
associated with the Strategic Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the District has consulted with other public agencies and the general
public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as required by
CEQA; and,
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1999, the District held a duly-noticed public hearing to
provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the
Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the District has objectively evaluated the comments from public
agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and,
v
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program
EIR, either in full or in summary, together with the Districts responses to significant
environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process, have been
included in the Final Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR, Technical
Appendix, and the Response to Comments have been presented to the members of the
District Board of Directors for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and
commitment to, the Strategic Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
1. That the proposed Strategic Plan Final Program EIR has identified a number of
significant or potentially significant environmental effects. These impacts are
identified in the Final Program EIR.
2. That the Board of Directors do further find that changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which avoid or substantially
lessen significant environmental effects, all identified in the Final Program EIR.
3. That the Draft Program EIR includes findings concerning the Scenario 2, the
"Preferred Alternative"; significant unavoidable adverse impacts; significant impacts
reduced to less than significant levels by mitigation measures incorporated into the
Strategic Plan, attached as Attachment A.
4. That the District will implement mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to
less-than significant levels as identified as Attachment B.
5. That the Board of Directors hereby makes Findings of Fact concerning the Project
Alternatives, identified as Attachment C.
6. That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the Notice of
Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of
CEQA and the District's CEOA procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 27, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
WmdonWwa1\wp.dta�adminaSVIe Maro11999WCSD99-19.dw
2
0
ATTACHMENT A
FINDINGS CONCERNING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
The Preferred Alternative in the 1999 Strategic Plan is Treatment Scenario 2—providing
sufficient secondary treatment to meet the needs of the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR)
System Project being undertaken jointly by the District and the Orange County Water District
(OCWD)and maintaining compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES)permit requirements for ocean discharge. In order to meet the treatment goals of this
Scenario,the Strategic Plan identifies capital improvements for both the collection system and the
treatment plants. In conjunction with the Preferred Alternative,the District may be required to
use the existing 78-inch diameter outfall to accommodate emergency peak flows in excess of
current discharge capacity. Attachment A provides detailed discussion of the rationale for
choosing the Preferred Alternative over other alternatives analyzed.
Level of Treatment: Treatment Scenario 2 would provide the level of treatment necessary to
meet the NPDES permit conditions and the California Ocean Plan,which embodies State of
California regulatory requirements for ocean discharges. All wastewater would receive advanced
primary treatment with a percentage also receiving secondary treatment prior to ocean discharge.
In coordination with OCWD,50-80 mgd average daily flow and up to 100 mgd peak wet weather
flow of secondary effluent would be diverted from OCSD to the GWR System. The amount of
secondary treatment in the ocean discharge would be governed by needs of the GWR System and
by the NPDES permit limits.
Treatment Plant Expansion: Under Treatment Scenario 2,all proposed additional treatment
facilities would be located within the existing property boundaries of the District's Reclamation
Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2. Figures 3-7 through 3-11 in the DEIR illustrate the
treatment plant expansion. Treatment Scenario 2 would require the least number of new facilities
of any of the alternatives analyzed.
Ocean Discharge:The existing 120-inch diameter outfsIl has adequate capacity to accommodate
average dry weather flows to the year 2020 as shown in Figure 3-2 of the DEIR. The outfall
would also accommodate most wet weather flows using the combination of peak wet weather
management measures outlined on page S-16 of the DEIR. The existing 1204nch diameter
outfall's rated capacity of 480 mgd has been exceeded on five separate occasions since its
installation in 1971,reaching 550 mgd during a storm event in 1995. During each event,the
outfall was able to accommodate all the effluent without requiring emergency discharge at either
of the alternative two discharge points. Due to increased development and projected population
growth within the service area,peak wet weather flows are estimated to reach 775 mgd by the
year 2020(see Section 3.4). To reconcile the discharge capacity deficiencies during peak flow
OCMR 1 .99-0X AvssM A A-1 F A196 M
V
periods,the District will implement several measures to alleviate peak wet weather flow(DEIR
S-16). As a last resort,the District would use the existing 78-inch diameter outfall for infrequent
peak flow discharges. Modeling of wet weather flows in the system indicate that the need or
probability of use for the 78-inch to handle peak wet weather flow is greater today(three times in
five years)than it will be under the preferred project in the future(one time in three years). This
is due in part to the hydraulic relief provided by the GWR System,significantly reducing the need
for peak wet weather discharges to the near-shore.
Collection System: Baud on the modeled pipeline deficiencies by the year 2020 within the
system,OCSD proposes to replace and rehabilitate pipelines to meet future needs and prevent
overflows. In addition,five pump stations were determined to be in need of equipment upgrades.
Nearly 47 miles of pipeline replacements(separated into 32 individual projects)am planned
almost exclusively within developed city streets. Open trench and jack-and-bore construction
would be employed. Specific collection system projects are summarized in Table 3-19 of the
Draft PEIR.
Biosolids Program:The Strategic Plan recommends no immediate changes in the method of
biosolids processing and beneficial reuse(or disposal as needed),however,a number of studies of
the system are proposed. The Strategic Plan outlines several process changes which could
potentially increase biosolids quality and operational efficiency. None of these technologies are
recommended for immediate implementation,but the District will continue to play an active role
in researching new technologies and monitoring studies performed nation-wide. The District will
need to find additional land applications sites for the projected increase in biosolids. The District
will continue to research the possibility of acquiring land dedicated to biosolids recycling.
FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE
ADVERSEIMPACTS
The FPEIR indicates that the project would result in six significant unavoidable impacts
attributable to the project. As described below in the findings for each of these impacts,there are
either no feasible mitigation measures or the feasible mitigation measures would only partially
mitigate the impact and the residual effect would remain significant. It is hereby determined that
these impacts are acceptable for the reasons specified in Statement of Overriding Considerations.
OCEAN DISCHARGE/MARINE ENVIRONMENT(PEIR CHAPTER 5.0)
Pathogen Levels from Peak Wet Weather Discharge(Impact 5-9):Effluent discharge to
the 78-inch outfall at a rate of once every three years would result in significant impacts to
levels of pathogens in the nearshore waters used for water-contact activities or where
shellfish are harvested. Use of the 78-inch diameter outfall would require short-term
closure of the beach to human use.
Cumulative Pathogen Levels from Peak Wet Weather Discharge(Impact 5-13): Use of
the 78-inch outfall for peak wet weather discharges would contribute to significant
OGSDP ].-W9A A A-2 FSAI9 M
cumulative pollutant loads(particularly pathogens)to the nearshore environment during
wet weather events in combination with non-point source pollution.
TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION (PEIR CHAPTER 6.0)
Noise Impacts from Construction(Impact 6.41): Construction activities related to the
proposed treatment plant improvements at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant
No. 2 would intermittently and temporarily generate noise levels above existing ambient
levels in the project vicinity. -
Air Quality Impacts from Construction(Impact 6.5-1): Project development under any
of the six project scenarios would generate short-term emissions of air pollutants, including
dust and criteria pollutants from demolition,construction and/or restoration activities.
Air Quality Impacts from Mobile Sources (Impact 6.5-3): Emissions at both treatment
plants under any of the project scenarios would continue to result from mobile sources.
Mobile sources are projected to exceed the SCAQMD nitrous oxides significance threshold
of 55 Ibs/day.
Cumulative Air Quality Impacts from Construction Projects(Impact 6.11-1):
Cumulative impacts to air quality and noise could occur as a result of treatment facility
construction activities coupled with the construction of the GWR System treatment
facilities.
SECONDARY EFFECTS OF GROWTH
Secondary Effects of Growth(Impact 11-2): The OCSD Strategic Plan would
accommodate planned growth in the Service Area. Implementation of planned growth
would result in secondary environmental effects. The effects of planned growth have been
identified and addressed in the EIRs for Regional Plans,General Plans for Service Area
cities,and associated Specific Plans. Some of the secondary effects of growth which have
been identified as significant and unavoidable include air quality and traffic congestion.
FINDINGS
Based on the FPEIR and the entire record before the OCSD Board,the Board finds that there is
no feasible mitigation measure that will reduce the impacts presented above to less than
significant levels. Nonetheless,the District is adopting the mitigation measures presented in the
Mitigation and Monitoring/Reporting Program included as Attachment B. Specific economic,
legal,social,technological,or other considerations justify approval of the project notwithstanding
these impacts as more fully described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations.
ocsoa ..ssux.Av., A A-3 rsAisswu
9
FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS REDUCED TO
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS BY MITIGATION MEASURES
INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT
The FPEIR identifies significant impacts,that are reduced to a"less than significant"level by the
inclusion in the project approval of the mitigation measures identified in the FPEIR. It is hereby
determined that these significant environmental impacts of the project will be avoided or
substantially lessened by the inclusion of the identified mitigation measures,which are presented
in the MMRP in Attachment B.
OCEAN DISCHARGE/MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Oil and Grease Levels(Impact 5-3): Oil and Grease effluent levels would comply with
numeric permit limits under Scenarios 1,2,and 5 but would potentially create observable
floating particles which would be a permit violation.
Brine Added to Discharge(Impact 5-5): Increased discharge of brine under any scenario
but particularly under Scenarios 2,4,and 6 with the GWR System would reduce initial
dilution and increase metals concentrations. This could result in potentially significant
toxicity impacts.
Outfall Cleaning(Impact 5.11): Clean out of the existing 120-inch outfall, if needed,to
remove accumulated sediments and debris would move sediments into the marine
environment,which could result in short-term water quality and sediment impacts affecting
marine organisms.
New 120-Inch Diameter Outfall(Impact 5.12):laying pipeline for the new outfall
would result in the permanent loss of hundreds of thousands of square feet of soft-bottom,
benthic habitat. Adjacent communities would be temporarily disrupted by increased
sedimentation. Disturbance of bottom sediment may result in the short-term release of
contaminants into the water column.
TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION
Construction Impacts to Neighboring Land Uses(Impact 6.1-1): Expansion of the
OCSD treatment facilities,as proposed under Scenarios 2 and 4,would require the
construction of additional facilities at Reclamation Plant No. I and at Treatment Plant No.
2. Project construction would result in short-tern disturbance of adjacent land uses.
Visual Impacts Impact(6.1-3): Expansion and operation of the proposed facilities for
both Scenarios 2 and 4 could adversely alter existing visual character of the site with
installation of tall structures and the removal of trees. In additional project implementation
could introduce new sources of light and glare.
Traffic Impacts from Construction(Impact 6.2-1): Periods of peak construction will
increase traffic along local access streets.
ocso aooiw�vs.ox.am.nm�mA A4 ssAIs
Local Traffic Impacts from Operations (Impact 6.2-2):Additional traffic would be
generated from the ongoing operations of the facilities at Reclamation Plant No. I and
Treatment Plant No. 2. Sources of new traffic include chemical truck deliveries,trips by
new District's employees,and increased biosolids hauling truck trips.
Regional Traffic Impacts from Operation(Impact 6.2-3):Increased biosolids and
chemical truck trips would impact regional transportation systems including freeways,
especially 1405 and I-5.
Birds Nests(Impact 6.3-1): Removal of trees on the treatment plant sites during
construction could impact nesting birds. This impact is considered less than significant
with mitigation.
Noise Impacts from Operations(Impact 6.4-2): Operation of proposed new equipment at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 would generate noise levels above
existing ambient levels in the project vicinity.
Noise Impacts to Workers (Impact 6.4-3):Workers at Reclamation Plant No. I and
Treatment Plant No. 2 may be exposed to excess noise levels from the operation of new
facilities.
Air Quality Impacts from Operations (Impact 6.5-2): Emissions at both treatment plants
under any of the project scenarios would continue to result from stationary sources.
Increasingly restrictive air quality regulations are anticipated in the near future to comply
with federal air quality standards,making air emissions permits for new and modified
equipment more difficult to obtain.
Air Quality Impacts from Central Generation System-CGS(Impact 6.5.4):Modifying
the current CGS or adding new power-generating equipment would require South Coast Air
Quality Management District(SCAQMD)permit modifications. Energy requirements
greater than the permitted CGS capacity of IS megawatt would require permit
modifications.
Odor Impacts (Impact 6.5-5):The project under each of the treatment scenarios could
generate objectionable odors in the project vicinity and in other areas located downwind
from the treatment facilities.
Seismic Hazards(Impact 6.6-1): Project facilities,under any of the treatment scenarios,
would be located in areas susceptible to primary and secondary seismic hazards
(groundshaking, liquefaction,settlement). Damage to facilities could result in the event of
a major earthquake.
Sewage Spills from Seismic Hazards(Impact 6.6.2): Groundshaking could cause spills
of raw sewage,causing a significant impact to public health.
OCSD Rmlwim 99Ox Amlvrcn+/ A-5 GSAI9 u
9
Erosion during Construction(Impact 6.7-1): Construction of any of the treatment system
scenarios could result in an increase in erosion and siltation into surface waters.
Construction could also result in chemical spills(e.g., fuels,oils,or grease)to stormwater,
and increase turbidity and decrease water quality in waters of the U.S.
Dewatering(Impact 6.7-2): Pile driving and excavation activities at Reclamation Plant
No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2 may encounter groundwater, and local dewatering may be
required.
Flood Hazards (Impact 6.7-3): Reclamation Plant No 1. and Treatment Plant No. 2 are
located in the 100-year floodplain of the Santa Ana River. New facilities proposed under
any of the scenarios considered would expose structures and people to a 100-year flood
event and/or effects of a tsunami.
Hazardous Materials (Impact 6.9-1): Increasing quantities of hazardous materials stored
on site could impact public health in the event of a catastrophic spill or explosion.
Increasing liquid oxygen storage could increase the hazard.
Growth-Inducement(Impact 11-1): By removing wastewater treatment capacity as one
barrier to growth,the District would have indirect, growth-inducement potential to support
planned development within the Service Area that is consistent with and within the levels
of development approved in the adopted General Plans.
COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Construction Impacts to Neighboring Land Uses (Impact 7.1-1): Construction activities
associated with the trunk sewer systems would involve the rehabilitation and replacement
of existing pipelines. Construction activities would result in short-term disturbance of
adjacent land uses.
Traffic Impacts from Construction(Impact 7.2-1): Construction activities during
trenching in city streets will impact traffic circulation during construction period.
Biology (Impact 7.3-1): Based on conceptual alignment information for OCSD's proposed
collection system projects, construction of the collection pipeline system improvements
would occur in previously disturbed,developed areas,primarily public streets. No impact
to biological resources would occur if projects occur within paved areas. However,if final
project alignments are revised to include an undeveloped area or open space, potential
impacts to biological resource could occur; in these cases OCSD would conduct additional
CEQA evaluations as needed to clarify and address impacts to biological resources.
Noise Impacts from Construction (Impact 7.4-1): Construction activities related to the
proposed collection system improvements would intermittently and temporarily generate
noise levels above existing ambient levels in the project vicinity.
OCSD Rmlww"A-0 AY .e .A A-6 UAI%W36
Air Quality Impacts from Construction(Impact 7.5-1):The proposed improvements to
OCSD's collection systems would generate short-tens emissions of air pollutants,
including dust and criteria pollutants,from excavation,installation and/or replacement
activities. This is considered a short-term significant impact that would cease at the
completion of construction activities. Construction emission impacts are estimated to occur
for an average of three to four weeks within one block of any given property.
Seismic Hazards(Impact 7.6-1): Project facilities would be located in areas susceptible to
primary and secondary seismic hazards(groundshaking,liquefaction, settlement). Damage
to facilities could result in the event of a major earthquake.
Erosion from Construction(Impact 7.7-1):Construction activities could result in erosion
and siltation into nearby surface waters,leading to degradation of water quality or flooding
hazards. Construction could also result in chemical spills(e.g.,fuels,oils, or grease)to
stormwater,and increase turbidity and decrease water quality in waters of the U.S.
Impacts to Emergency Services During Construction(Impact 7.8-1): Construction of
the collection pipeline system could result in short-term disruption of emergency services
in the vicinity of the project area.
Public Safety During Construction(Impact 7.8-2): Constmction of the collection system
projects would create a public safety hazard in the vicinity of the construction area.
Utilities Relocation(Impact 7.8-3):Construction of the collection pipeline system could
result in short-term disruption of utility service and may require utilities relocation.
Aesthetics(Impact 7.9-1): Project implementation could result in short-tern visual
impacts resulting from construction activities. Less than Significant after Mitigation
Measures.
Cultural Resources from Construction(Impact 7.10.1): Implementation of the proposed
collection system improvements may affect known, significant archaeological resources.
Cultural Resources from Construction (Impact 7.10-2): Implementation of the proposed
collection system improvements may affect unknown,potentially significant archeological
resources. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Cumulative Construction Impacts(Impact 7.11-1): Construction activities of the
collection system projects in conjunction with other projects would result in short-term
cumulative impacts. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
BIOSOLIDS MANGEMENT
Traffic Impacts from Biosolids Trucks (Impact 8-2): The projected increase in residual
solids volumes would increase truck traffic on local roadways.
OCSDRmIW."9 l(,Au ,e A A-7 aSAt9 36
Noise Impacts from Increased Truck Traffic (Impact 8-3):The projected increase in
residual solids volumes and related truck traffic would increase ambient noise levels at
nearby sensitive receptor locations.
Cumulative Impacts to Regional Biosolids Applications(Impact 8-5):The projected
increase in biosolids production from POTWs in the Southern California region could
present a cumulative impact on the availability of land application sites.
FINDINGS
Based on the Final PEIR and the entire administrative record,the Board finds that changes or
alterations have been incorporated into the project which will substantially lessen the significant
effects as identified above,thereby reducing potential effects to less than significant levels. The
District adopts the mitigation measures included in the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
included in Attachment B.
Based on the Final PEIR and the entire administrative record before the OCSD Board,the Board
finds that the Mitigation Measure 6.5-If would not be feasible based on economic and technical
considerations and could create additional impacts. The mitigation measure will therefore not be
adopted.
The mitigation measure was included in the Draft PEIR as follows:
Mitigation Measure 6.5-1f: Trucks should be washed off prior to leaving the
construction site.
It is infeasible to wash construction trucks off prior to the trucks leaving construction sites.
Facilities and space are generally not available,nor is it feasible to capture and potentially treat
the wash-water runoff which would be generated from washing numerous large construction
vehicles. Mud and water generated by washing operations would be tracked onto City streets and
create potential safety and aesthetic impacts.The additional time and costs associated with such
activities on the construction sites are also infeasible.
The other measures designed to reduce dust emissions 6.5-la through 6.5-le are adequate to
reduce the potential impact to less-than-significant levels. Therefore,Mitigation Measure 6.5-If
will not be included in the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program and will not be adopted as
part of these findings.
Finally,based on the Final PEIR and the entire administrative record before the OCSD Board,the
Board finds that the Impact 6.74 is not a significant impact. The Draft PER identified the
impact as follows:
Impact 6.74: Construction and long-term operation of the proposed improvements to
both treatment plants would increase the area of impervious surface and result in an
incremental increase in surface runoff in these areas. Less than Significant with
Mitigation Measures.
OCSDR—]..fl XAvuMemA A-g MAI% 36
Since the District collects and treats surface runoff within the two treatment plant sites,the
increase in impervious area created by additional facilities would not significantly increase storm
water runoff. As a result,impacts associated with increased storm water nmoff would not be
anticipated.The District finds that this impact is less than significant. No mitigation measures
would be necessary to address this impact.
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
SUMMARY OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requires a decision-maker, in this case the
OCSD Board of Directors,to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable
environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the Board of Directors
allows the occurrence of significant effects through approval of a project,it must state its specific
reasons for so doing in writing. Such reasons are included in the"statement of overriding
considerations"
Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines establishes the following requirements for a statement of
overriding considerations:
(a) CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance,as applicable,the economic,legal,
social,technological or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable
environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific
economic, legal, social,technological or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects,the adverse environmental effects may be
considered"acceptable."
(b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant
effects,which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened,
the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final
EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations
shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
(c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations,the statement should be
included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of
determination. This statement does not substitute for,and shall be in addition to,findings
required pursuant to Section 15091.
The Orange County Sanitation District(hereafter referred to as"District"or"OCSD')adopts and
makes the following statement of overriding considerations regarding the remaining unavoidable
impacts identified within the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR).
to adopting this Resolution,the District's Board of Directors acknowledges that it has weighed
the benefits of the identified Preferred Alternative,treatment Scenario 2 against the adverse
significant impacts that have not been avoided or substantially lessened to less-than-significant
levels through mitigation.
The OCSD Board of Directors hereby determines that the benefits of the Preferred Alternative of
the 1999 Strategic Plan outweigh the unmitigated adverse impacts and the project should be
orsnxm1�mesaC,Av.remm+A A-9 rsAls m
approved. The OCSD Board of Directors finds that to the extent that the identified significant
adverse impacts have not been avoided or substantially lessened,there are specific economic,
legal, social,technological or other considerations which support approval of the project.
SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Unavoidable or potentially unavoidable significant environmental effects of the project identified
in the Final EIR/EIS and Findings of Significant Impacts include the following:
Effluent discharge to the 78-inch diameter outfall at a rate of once every three years would
result in elevated levels of pathogens in the near-shore waters during brief wet weather
events significantly impacting beneficial uses and prompting beach closures. (Impact 5-9)
These infrequent near-shore discharges in conjunction with non-point source discharges in
the region would create a cumulative significant impact to beneficial uses. (Impact 5-13)
Construction activities related to the proposed treatment plant improvements at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 would intermittently and temporarily
generate noise levels above existing ambient levels in the project vicinity(Impact 6.4-1)
Construction and demolition activities related to the proposed treatment plant
improvements would generate short-term emissions of air pollutants. (Impact 6.5-1)
Mobile-source air emissions would continue to result from operations at both treatment
plants. Mobile sources are projected to exceed the SCAQMD nitrous oxides significance
threshold of 55 Ibs/day. (Impact 6.5-3)
Cumulative impacts to air quality and noise could occur as a result of treatment facility
construction activities coupled with the construction of the GM%System treatment
facilities. (Impact 6.11-1)
The OCSD Strategic Plan would continue to accommodate planned growth in the Service
Area. Implementation of planned growth would insult in secondary environmental effects,
some of which have been identified as significant including air quality and traffic.
(Impact 11-2)
ADOPTION OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The District specifically adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations and finds that:a)as
part of the approval provisions,the Preferred Alternative has eliminated or substantially lessened
all significant effects on the environment where feasible;b)other mitigation measures to mitigate
the secondary effects of growth associated with the project are within thejurisdiction of other
public agencies,and,c)the remaining unavoidable impacts of the project are acceptable in light
of the environmental,economic,legal,social,technological,and other considerations set forth
herein, because the benefits of the project outweigh the significant and adverse impacts.
The District finds that each of the overriding considerations set forth below constitutes a separate
and independent ground for finding that the benefits of the Preferred Alternative of the Strategic
Plan outweigh its significant adverse environmental impacts and is an overriding consideration
OCSDRe Wim99Lx.Atl ,,M A A-10 ESA/96 M
warranting approval of the Preferred Alternative. These matters are supported by substantial r
evidence in the record.
BENEFITS
The adoption of the Preferred Alternative of the Strategic Plan will enable the District to provide
sanitary sewer collection services and wastewater treatment for the projected population of the
Service Area through the year 2020,protecting public health and safety. The District finds that
the benefits of safe and reliable wastewater collection and treatment overrides the significant
concoction and operational impacts associated with the Preferred Alternative.
Participation in the GWR System would contribute substantially to the responsible management
of water resources in the Southern California region by recycling 60 to 100 million gallons per
day of highly treated effluent for groundwater recharge. The District finds that implementation of
the GWR System would significantly reduce the frequency of need for near-shore discharges to
the 78-inch outfall during peak wet weather events.
The District finds that the economic,technological,and environmental benefits of using the
existing 78-inch diameter near-shore outf dl for infrequent peak wet weather discharge would
override the temporary significant impacts to near-shore beneficial uses. Use of the 78-inch
diameter outf dl for infrequent peak wet weather discharges would occur in lieu of concocting a
new$150-200 million deepwater outfall. A new deep-water outfall would constitute a significant
capital expense for a facility needed for infrequent peak wet weather discharges. The additional
dry weather capacity would far exceed anticipated need. By delaying the installation of a new
I20-inch diameter outfall parallel to the existing outfall,the District will avoid adverse
construction impacts to the coastal and marine environments in addition to avoiding significant
expense.
The cities serviced by the District(DEIR page 2-1 Table 2-I)and the County of Orange
acknowledge the economic benefits including jobs,increased sales revenue,and increased
property tax revenue derived from the implementation of their General Plans and associated
specific plans. The cities and County also acknowledge social benefits derived from
implementation of their General Plans and associated specific plans, including increases in
housing opportunities within the city and the region,increases in affordable housing, increases in
each city's contribution to its fair share of the regional housing opportunities, and provision of a
mix of housing types. The District finds that the benefits of continued sanitary sewer service
commensurate with forecast regional demand override the significant secondary effects of
growth.
QMMP1 mknp of Fm-Atnclunent Ad.
ocsosa IW."ax AveamxmA A-11 ESAI96 M
v
ATTACHMENT B.
MITIGATION MONITORINGIREPORTING PROGRAM
OG9D& 1 .9 AmcM1mentA A-12 UA/9b M
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MARINE ENVIRONMENT/OCEAN DISCHARGE
Impact 5-3. Oil and Grease effluent levels would comply with numerical permit limits under Scenarios 1,2,and 5 but would potentially create observable
floating particles which would be a permit violation. This impact would be mitigated through monitoring and treatment to achieve and maintain
compliance.
Measure 5-3a: Oil and Grease.The District shall monitor receiving water in accordance with its current NPDES permit monitoring requirement and,if
floating particulates from the discharge are observed in surface receiving water,the District shall modify its treatment process to reduce oil and grease in
the effluent. Treatment modifications that may be implemented to address this issue include: increasing the level of secondary effluent in the discharge
blend, and employing new and/or additional chemical processes(new polymer)to increase oil and grease removal.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Incorporate surface water observations Publish results with annual monitoring Monthly,beginning when
in monthly marine monitoring program program report submitted to the RWQCB. OCSD treatment level is changed.
focused above ZID as well as down-
current.
2. Establish methods of increasing
treatment in order to be prepared to
eliminate floatables if necessary.
Measure 5-3b: Local Grease Ordinance. The District shall work with its member agencies to encourage adoption of local ordinances for improved source control
of oil and grease.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Board of Directors to pursue source Board to adopt source control politics. On-going
control policy actions. OCSD
OCSD SIrLegic Plm B- 1 ESA 196UM
Mitigation Mm..,and R,p ,,P.,— O0.ober 1999
ATTACIfMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Impact 5-5. Increased discharge of brine under any scenario but particularly under Scenarios 2,4, and 6 with the GWR System would reduce initial
dilution and increase metals concentrations. This could result in potentially significant toxicity impacts. Potentially significant.
Measure 5-5: Brine Effect Studies. Study and monitor the effect of brine and adjust treatment and/or brine addition as needed to maintain NPDES
permit effluent quality compliance.
a) Conduct a pilot study of the effect of increased brine discharge to OCSD effluent on effluent quality to demonshale NPDES permit compliance. Prior to start-up of
full operation of the GWR System Project,OCSD will test effluent quality with the addition of the GWR System project brine concentrate in accomlance with the
acute and chronic toxicity testing procedures required in the Dishict's NPDES permit. This will allow the District to corifimt the potential compliance with the
NPDES permit.
b) During GWR System operation,OCSD will continue its effluent quality testing and ocean monitoring in compliance with its NPDES permit I this testing or -
monitoring indicates the occurrence of or potential for noncompliance with effluent toxicity standards,the District will implement measures to achieve and
maintain NPDES compliance, including:
• brine dilution
• brine treatment
• toxicity identification evaluation and appropriate source comml measures
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate contract to study brine toxicity. Include status of contract and study At adoption of findings.
2. Based on study results, identify further results in Annual Operations And OCSD and OCWD
actions. Maintenance Report.
Impact 5-9: Effluent discharge to the 7E-inch outfall at a rate of once every three years would result in significant impacts to levels of pathogens in the
nearshore waters used for water-contact activities or where shellfish are harvested.
Measure 5-9a: Pathogen Reduction. Pathogen reduction in the wet weather discharge would partially mitigate the impact of wet weather discharge to
the nearshore area by reducing the pathogen levels and thereby reducing the health risk. Disinfection could reduce pathogen levels but it is not
recommended by the RWQCB based on cost and the potential for residual chlorine in the discharge to have an adverse impact to marine organisms.
Alternative methods of pathogen removal appropriate for wet weather flow treatment are under development and include filtration processes. The
District will continue to evaluate new technologies for pathogen reduction and will implement those that prove to be feasible, effective,and cost-
effective. Even with some level of pathogen reduction, beach closure would still probably be required,thus the impact to beach use would remain
significant and unavoidable during these infrequent events.
OCSD Smueaic Plm B-2 aSA'Wwm
Miuyoen Morvimin8 aeP•mina R9pem O .k'19"
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Continue research of pathogen Include status and results of research in On-going.
reduction technologies, in particular, Annual Operations And Maintenance OCSD
micro-filtration. Report.
Impact 5-11: Removal of accumulated sediments in the existing 120-inch outfall, if needed, would move sediments into the marine environment,which
could result in short-term water quality and sediment impacts affecting marine organisms.
Measure 5-Il: Outfall Cleaning. If necessary,the District will develop plans to clean out the outfall using appropriate methods approved by the
RWQCB to protect water quality in accordance with regulations. The plan will include methods to contain Boatables and disperse the sediments so that
impacts to benthic communities and water quality are minimized.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Submit clean-out methods to RWQCB Include status and results of methods in
prior to implementation. Annual Operations And Maintenance OCSD Prior to clean-out
Report.
Impact 5-12. Laying pipeline for any new outfall would result in the permanent loss of hundreds of thousands of square feet of soft-bottom, benthic habitat.
Adjacent communities would be temporarily disrupted by increased sedimentation. Disturbance of bottom sediment may result in the short-term release of
contaminants into the water column. Potentially significant but can be mitigated.
Measure 5-12: Outfall Siting. The District would conduct additional detailed,site-specific studies for the siting of a new second 120-inch ocean
outfall. These studies would clarify the extent of marine resources that would be affected by construction and identified appropriate mitigation measures
to minimize the area of disturbance.
OCSD SUtl &Plm 13.3 ESA I96W36
Mirigetion MoNbring and Reporting Program 0n.E r 1999
ATTACHMENT B. MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate feasibility and design studies Include status and methods in Annual
prior to construction. Operations And Maintenance Report. OCSD Prior to construction
2. Prepare appropriate CEQA
documentation of proposed project.
3. Implement mitigation measures
identified in subsequent CEQA
documentation.
Impact 5-13: Use of the 78-inch outfall for peak wet weather discharges would contribute to significant cumulative pollutant loads(particularly pathogens)
to the nearshore environment during wet weather events in combination with non-point source pollution. Significant.
Measure 5-13: Pathogen Reduction. To mitigate the cumulative contribution from use of the 78-inch outPAll,the District will implement Mitigation
Measure 5-9, above to provide additional pathogen reduction as allowed and/or required by the RWQCB.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Continue research of pathogen Include status and results of methods in
reduction technologies,in particular, Annual Operations And Maintenance OCSD On going
micro-filtration. Report.
Treatment Plant
Land Use
Impact 6.1-1. Expansion of the OCSD treatment facilities,as proposed under Scenarios 2 and 4, would require the construction of additional facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and at Treatment Plant No. 2. Project construction would result in short-term disturbance of adjacent land uses. Less than
Significant with Mitigation Measures.
O DsV.'ic Plm B-4 ESAI9 36
mfiae=Mo nm and!Up naH em 0dGkr 1999
ATfACHMZNT R. MTITGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 6.1-1a: Construction Hours. The District's standard specifications provide construction hours of work between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM,except
for emergency or special circumstances requiring that work be done during low-Flow periods.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight Prior to and during construction
and construction ordinances in for administrative record. OCSD
construction specifications.
2. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6.1-1 b: Construction Notification. The District shall post informational signs outside plant when major projects are being constructed.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Post notices near job site outside plant Maintain record of distribution for Prior to construction
property administrative record. OCSD
Impact 6.1-3. Expansion and operation of the proposed facilities for both Scenarios 2 and 4 could adversely alter existing visual character of the site with
installation of tall structures and the removal of trees. In additional project implementation could introduce new sources of light and glare. Less than
Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.1-3a: Implement Landscaping Master Plan. The District will implement the Urban Design Element of the Strategic Plan in order to
improve the visual appearance of the site. Recommendations from the Landscape Master Plans (of the Urban Design Element) include the development
of buffer zones, planting of trees at the perimeter of the plants along sensitive visual corridors (e.g. Santa Ana bikeway),and maintaining and enhancing
the appearance of existing buffer zones.
OCSDStr gic P1m B-5 ESA196Df36
Mitigmion M....,and Reporting Odo r19"
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM -
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Comply with Urban Design Plan. Maintain Urban Design plan for On going
administrative record. OCSD
Measure 6.1-3b: Erterior Lighting.The District will install permanent exterior lighting on new facilities to point away from neighboring residential
areas as possible to minimize visible light sources.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Comply with Urban Design Plan. Maintain Urban Design Plan and record Prior to and after construction
2. Conduct nighttime survey after new of nighttime inspection for administrative OCSD
construction to confirm less than record.
significant impact.
Traffic
Impact 6.2-1: Periods of peak construction will increase traffic along local access streets. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures,
Measure 6.2-1: Contractor Coordination. For each major project or construction period,the District would complete a detailed construction schedule
and notify the Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach of construction. Construction vehicles shall be run on a schedule to minimize track traffic
on arterial highways.
WSDSvt4c Plx B-6 ESA/56 m
M SWw Mop M W Rrywting W= O ,IM
ATfACHWNT B, MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Require traffic control plan for Ensure that construction vehicle traffic Prior to and during construction
construction projects. complies with traffic control plan. OCSD
2. Notify affected cities of construction
schedule. Provide record of construction oversight.
3. Provide construction oversight.
Impact 6.2-2: Additional traffic would be generated from the ongoing operations of the facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2.
Sources of new traffic include chemical truck deliveries,trips by new District's employees,and increased biosolids hauling truck trips. Less than
Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.2-2a: Ride•Sharing Program. The Districts will continue the existing ride-sharing program to encourage employees to join a carpool and
use transit.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
Include status of rideshare program in Annually
Operation and Maintenance Annual OCSD
Report.
Measure 6.2-2b: Traffic Management Chemical delivery trucks and screenings and grit and biosolids disposal trucks will avoid operating during peak
traffic hours when possible.
OCSD a'...4.Mn B-7 ss /i M
F*se.sm MONioneg® R.P.MP .m oadRr lass
A7TACHMENTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. The District will develop a preferred Prepare a record of hauling schedule. At hauler's contract renewal
truck-hauling schedule avoiding peak OCSD
traffic hours.
2. Thereafter the District will attempt to
comply with the schedule whenever
possible.
3. The District will incorporate this
preferred schedule when renewing
contracts with haulers and chemical
deliverers.
Impact 6.2-3: Increased biosolids and chemical truck trips would impact regional transportation systems including freeways,especially 1405 and 1-5. Less
than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.2-3: Biosolids Transport. The District shall artange for the transport of biosolids by trucks during off-peak travel hours when possible to
reduce truck travel times and minimize impacts to the regional transportation system.
O SD Svu &Ple B-8 E5A 1%WA6
M,.-M.,ti ..g and Rep .,Pmgem Onohe 1919
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. The District will develop a preferred Prepare a record of hauling schedule. At hauler's contract renewal
truck-hauling schedule avoiding peak OCSD
traffic hours.
1 Thereafter the District will attempt to
comply with the schedule whenever
possible.
3. The District will incorporate this
preferred schedule when renewing
contracts with haulers.
Impact 6.3-1: Removal of trees on the treatment plant sites during construction could impact nesting birds. This impact is considered less than significant
with mitigation.
Measure 6.3-1: Nesting Birds. Prior to the removal of healthy trees on site,a biologist knowledgeable of birds will survey the trees to determine if active nests are
present. If nests of sensitive species are present,tree removal will be scheduled to avoid the nesting season.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include tree surveys in construction Maintain record of biologist survey OCSD Prior to and during construction
specifications for on-site construction recommendations and record of District
projects. adherence with recommendations.
MSD Se.&M. B-9 ESA/96W36
Mitigetim Mo,tiW,ing mG Rspw4ng Pmgrem CttoLe,1999
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Noise
Impact 6.4-1: Construction activities related to the proposed treatment plant improvements at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 would
intermittently and temporarily generate noise levels above existing ambient levels in the project vicinity. Significant and Unavoidable.
Measure 6.4-1a: Construction Hours. The District's standard specifications provide construction hours of work between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM,
except for emergency or special circumstances requiring that work be done during low-flow periods.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
2. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight Prior to and during construction
and construction ordinances in for administrative record. OCSD
construction specifications.
3. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6.4-lb: Muffled Equipment. All equipment used during construction shall be muffled and maintained in good operating condition. All
internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be fitted with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight Prior to and during construction
and construction ordinances in for administrative record. OCSD
construction specifications.
2. Include noise reduction procedures in
construction specifications
3. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6.4-1c: Pile-Driving Noise Reduction. OCSD shall consult with an acoustical engineer to evaluate other alternatives for mitigating impacts
from extensive pile driving activities when necessary.
ocsDs4 gm Plm B- 10 ESA/96W36
M UgWm Movmnn and Repmwg Pmgun 0.o ,1999
ATTACfUWZNT I, MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate contract with qualified engineer Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction
to reduce noise impacts. for administrative record.
2. Incorporate wise eduction solutions.
3. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6.4-1d: Alternatives for Foundations. OCSD Will evaluate the use of alternative foundation designs to avoid a need for pilings where cost-effective
and technically feasible.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include preference to avoid pilings Maintain record of design specifications. OCSD Prior to project design
where possible in project design
specifications.
Measure 6.4-le: Construction Notification. Nearby sensitive receptors affected by construction shall be notified conceming the project timing and
construction schedule,and shall be provided with a phone number to call with questions or complaints.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Prepare and distribute notifications. Maintain record of notification OCSD Prior to construction
distribution list.
Measure 6.4-IL• Pile Driving Noise Reduction. Noise-reduction measures will be implemented such as acoustic insulation or by other means during
the construction period at Reclamation Plant No. 1 to reduce a nuisance condition to the closest residences when pile driving is taking place.
ocso Strtlyi.K. B- 11 ESA/%WM
Miuratim MaNbring mA Repenieg Pmpun Oaoher 1999
ATTACHMENTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include noise reduction procedures in Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction
construction specifications for administrative record.
2. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6A-1g: Noise Reduction. The District will require construction contractors to include methods to reduce noise and elevated activity impacts to nearby wildlife
when working on the southern and southeastem border of Treatment Plant No. 2.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include noise reduction procedures in Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction
construction specifications for administrative record.
2. Conduct wildlife sensitivity training
during morning tail-gate meetings.
3. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 6.4-Ih: Exterior Lighting. The District will install permanent exterior lighting on new facilities to point away from the wetland areas
adjacent to Plant No. 2 as possible to minimize light sources permanently shining on the adjacent habitats.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include lighting design in construction Conduct periodic evening surveys to OCSD Prior to and during construction
specifications. observe lights.
MWWtr &PIM B-12 ESA/%ed%
M d,W=Mm,,wdaepmlinpP W Im
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Impact 6.4-2: Operation of proposed new equipment at Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2 would generate noise levels above existing
ambient levels in the project vicinity. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.4.2a: Noise Performance Standard. OCSD shall establish a performance noise standard for operational noise at Reclamation Plant No. I
and Treatment Plant No. 2. The performance standard shall apply to the property line of each plant and shall prohibit hourly average noise levels in
excess of 55 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.and 50 dBA between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.,as required by the Fountain
Valley and Huntington Beach Noise Ordinances. Available mitigation to achieve the performance standard consists of locating noise sources away from
sensitive receptors, installation of acoustical enclosures around noise sources,installation of critical application silencers and sequential mufflers for
exhaust noise, installation of louvered vents,directing vent systems away from nearby residences,and constructing soundwalls at the property lines.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of noise complaints for OCSD On-going
and construction ordinances in administrative record.
standard operational procedures.
2. Implement noise reduction procedures
when possible.
3. Consider operational noise when _
locating new equipment.
Measure 6.4-2b: Community Liaison. The District will assign a community liaison for odor and noise complaints.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
L Meet with community groups. Maintain record of meetings with OCSD On-going
2. Develop tasks and assignments for community groups.
liaison.
3. Periodically review effectiveness of
community liaison program.
OCSDSUu We Plm I - 13 ESAI9 36
AtitiSwmi Mwtibnry mE Repwtin8 PnPM Onobee 1999
ATTACHMENT B. MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Impact 6.4-3:Workers at Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2 may be exposed to excess noise levels from the operation of new facilities.
Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.4-3: Noise Control. Noise control measures shall be incorporated into the design of the facility. Once the facility is operational,a certified
industrial hygienist or other qualified individual shall measure the noise levels to which workers are exposed. If the OSHA 8-hour time weighted average
exposure for any worker exceed the 85 dBA threshold,a hearing conservation program must be initiated and appropriate administrative and engineering
controls must be put in place to protect workers.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include noise control measures in Include noise assessment results in annual OCSD Annually
design of new equipment. Operations and Maintenance Report.
2. Conduct noise assessments on site and
on the perimeter to quantify impacts to
workers and neighborhood to respond
to complaints.
Air Ouslity
Impact 6.5-1: Project development under any of the six project scenarios would generate short-term emissions of air pollutants, including dust and criteria
pollutants,from demolition,construction and/or restoration activities. Significant and Unavoidable.
Measure 6.5-1s: Equipment Emissions. General contractors shall maintain equipment engines in proper tune and operate construction equipment so as
to minimize exhaust emissions. Such equipment shall not be operated during second stage smog alerts.
Measure 6.5-1 b: Truck Emissions. During construction,trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues shall be kept with their engines off,when
not in use,to reduce vehicle emissions. Construction activities shall be phased and scheduled to avoid emissions peaks,and discontinued during second-
stage smog alerts.
Measure 6.5-1c: Dust Control. General contractors should use reasonable and typical watering techniques to reduce fugitive dust emissions. All
unpaved demolition and construction areas shall be wetted as necessary during excavation and construction,and temporary dust covers shall be used to
reduce dust emissions and meet SCAQMD District Rule 403.
Measure 6.5-Id: Soil Binders. Soil binders shall be spread on site,unpaved roads,and parking areas when needed.
OCSDStr Stc PI® B- 14 ESAI% M
M 48 nn Mcwb gmdR pa nr Pm m Wn im
ATfACHMENTR, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 6.5-1e: Ground Cover. Ground cover shall be reestablished following completion of construction activities through seeding and watering if
needed.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include air emissions restrictions and Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction.
standard operating procedures for for administrative record.
construction work in contract
specifications.
2. Include dust reduction measures listed
in mitigation measures in contract
specifications.
3. Conduct oversight of construction
activities to ensure scope of work is
carried out.
Impact 6.5-2: Emissions at both treatment plants under any of the project scenarios would continue to result from stationary sources. Increasingly
restrictive air quality regulations are anticipated in the near future to comply with federal air quality standards,making air emissions permits for new and
modified equipment more difficult to obtain. This impact would be less than significant with mitigation measures.
Measure 6.5-2a: Non-Combustion Air Emissions. The District will research ways of reducing NO,and air toxics emissions from stationary sources,
including non-combustion sources to meet future emission reductions that will be imposed by the SCAQMD.
Measure 6.5-2b: Future Air Emission Reductions. The District will comply with existing and future air quality regulations including SCAQMD
Rules and permit requirements. As air quality regulations become more restrictive in the South Coast Air Basin coinciding with increased operational
demand,the District will be required to reduce emissions through process modifications or by implementing new control technologies.
OCSDSum .Pix B- 15 - ESNIP 36
Mi.M�mdaep gPm Ondar IM
ATTACHMENT E, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate research on innovative control Maintain record of air emission data. OCSD Annually.
technology.
2. Provide SCAQMD with mandated Include status and results of air emissions
emissions reports to verify compliance. research in annual Operations and
Maintenance Report.
Impact 6.5-3: Emissions at both treatment plants under any of the project scenarios would continue to result from mobile sources. Mobile sources are
projected to exceed the SCAQMD nitrous oxides significance threshold of 55 Ibs/day. This would result in a significant impact to air quality.
Measure 6.5-3a: Ride-Sharing Program. The District will maintain its ride-share programs to reduce commuter traffic and air quality impacts.
Measure 6.5-3b: Use of CNG. The District will complete the implementation of compressed natural gas(CNG)stations and encourage contractors to
employ CNG-powered engines on residual solids haul trucks through contract incentives where possible.
Measure 6.5-3c: Alternative Fuels for Trucks. Alternative fuels shall be considered for biosolids haul trucks including low NO,emitters.
Measure 6.5-3d: Transportation Alternatives. The District shall initiate research on alternative methods of transporting biosolids to land application
sites including electric vehicles and rail.
OCSDStrtl crlm B- 16 ESA 1%W36
Mitigctirn MaMon�and Repwtieg Row Ottolcr 1999
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORMG/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate research on innovative control Include status of rideshare program in
technology,alternative fuels,and Operation and Maintenance Annual OCSD On going
biosolids hauling methods. Report.
2. Provide SCAQMD with mandated
emissions reports to verify compliance. Include status of research in alternative
3. Include in contracts and requests for fuels and biosolids haul methods in
qualifications from haulers that CNG is Operation and Maintenance Annual
available and encouraged. Report.
Impact 6.5-4: Modifying the current CGS or adding new power-generating equipment would require SCAQMD permit modifications. Energy
requirements greater than the permitted CGS capacity of 18 MW would require permit modifications. Less Than Significant impact with Mitigation.
Measure 6.5-4a: Energy Purchases. The District will purchase energy from off-site sources if air emissions permit modifications are denied.
Measure 6.54b: Clean-Burning Engines. The District will continue to research clean-buming engines for the CGS, in an effort to increase power
output while reducing criteria and toxic pollutants.
Measure 6.5-4c: Install BACf. The District will install Best Available Control Technology if necessary to comply with SCAQMD Rules.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Initiate research on innovative control Maintain record of air emission data. OCSD Annually.
technology.
2. Provide SCAQMD with mandated Include status and results of air emissions
emissions reports to verify compliance. research in annual Operations and
Maintenance Report.
OCSD StrWgic Mx B- 17 63AI9aMI6
MiuWiw Madbri��vdaepwYryrrogem Odohr 1999
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Impact 6.5-5: The project under each of the treatment scenarios could generate objectionable odors in the project vicinity and in other areas located
downwind from the treatment facilities. Less Than Significant after Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.5-5a: Odor Control. The District will evaluate the need for odor control equipment for future facilities to reduce fugitive foul odors and
include odor control when necessary. The District will also periodically review air emissions from existing solids handling to determine if odor control is
necessary.
Measure 6.5-5b: Dewalering Odor Control. When dewatering is required during excavation,the District shall provide odor control systems to reduce
construction odor impacts when necessary.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1_ Maintain odor control technology. Include odor complaints in annual OCSD Annually.
2. Provide odor control on new facilities Operations and Maintenance Report.
as needed.
Measure 6.5-5c: Community Liaison. The District will assign a community liaison for odor and noise complaints.
Measure 6.5-5d: Odor Complaint Follow-Up The District will follow-up with copies of odor complaint analysis to complainant and/or neighborhood
groups including the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association representative.
Measure 6.5-5e: Pre-Design Coordination. The District will maintain pre-design coordination on future projects at its treatment plants with interested
parties including cities and neighborhood associations.
Measure 6.5-5f. Community Outreach. The District will establish regular community outreach meetings with neighbors.
0051)5VWg1c Plm B- 18 ESA/96W36
Mi,.e Mmtib,and Reporting Program On r1999
ATTACHMENTR, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
L Meet with community groups to Maintain record of meetings with OCSD On-going
choose community liaison and periodic community groups.
meeting schedule.
2. Develop tasks and assignments for
liaison.
3. Periodically review effectiveness of
community liaison program.
4. Provide odor and noise complaint
information to community groups.
Geoloev
Impact 6.6-1: Project facilities, under any of the treatment scenarios,would be located in areas susceptible to primary and secondary seismic hazards
(groundshaking, liquefaction,settlement). Damage to facilities could result in the event of a major earthquake. Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures.
Measure 6.6-1 a: Geatechnical Evaluations. During the project design phase for all facilities,the District will perform design-level geotechnical
evaluations. The geotechnical evaluations will include subsurface exploration and review of seismic design criteria to ensure that design of the facilities
meet seismic safety requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
Site-specific testing for soils susceptible to liquefaction would be conducted. If testing results indicates that conditions are present that could result in
significant liquefaction and damage to project facilities,appropriate feasible measures will be developed and incorporated into the project design. The
performance standard to be used in the geotechnical evaluations for mitigation liquefaction hazards will be minimization of the hazards. Measures to
minimize significant liquefaction hazards could include the following:
• Densification or dewatering of surface or subsurface soils.
• Concoction of pile or pier foundations to support pipelines and/or buildings.
• Removal of material that could undergo liquefaction in the event of an earthquake and replacement with stable material.
Recommendations of the geotechnical report will be incorporated into the design and construction of proposed facilities.
=DS."4 cplan B- 19 ESA/96 U
MitiBetion Movbnng and Rep icgp Vm Oclobn 1999
ATTACHMENTA MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 6.6-Ib: Seismic Safety. The District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or
exceed seismic,design standards in the most recent edition of the California Building Code.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include design-level geotechnical Maintain record of specifications for OCSD Prior to construction
evaluations in specifications prior to administrative record.
construction.
2. Include in specifications compliance
with California Building Code
Impact 6.6-2: Groundshaking could cause spills of raw sewage, causing a significant impact to public health. Less than Significant impact with Mitigation
Measures.
Measure 6.6-2a: Spill Prevention. The District will implement the Spill Prevention Containment and Countermeasures Plan(SPCC).
Measure 6.6-2b: Spill Containment. OCSD chemical facilities will be designed with secondary containment, such as berms,to contain and divert toxic
chemicals from wastewater flows and isolate damaged facilities to reduce contamination risks.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Implement and update SPCC plan. Maintain record of SPCC for OCSD As needed.
administrative record.
Hvdroloev
Impact 6.7-1: Construction of any of the treatment system scenarios could result in an increase in erosion and siltation into surface waters. Construction
could also result in chemical spills(e.g.,fuels,oils, or grease)to stormwater,and increase turbidity and decrease water quality in waters of the U.S. Less
than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
CCSO Svu&PI- B-20 ESAI9 36
F Uge=WwW ingand Rc MPmgmm Cdo 'IM
ATTACHMENT B. MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 6.7-1 a: Best Management Practices. The District will implement Best Management Practices (BMPs)as outlined in the SWMP.
Measure 6.7-lb: Storm Water Management. The District will train construction and operation employees in storm water pollution prevention
practices. Individual contractors performing construction at each treatment facility shall be required to comply with provisions of the SWMP.
Measure 6.7-1c: Storm Drain Inspection. The District will inspect and maintain all on-site storm water drains and catch basins on plant property
regularly.
Measure 6.7-Id: Regional Board. The District will apply the SARWQCB's recommended BMPs during construction and operation as specified in the
SWMP.
Measure 6.7-1e: Construction Site Storm Water. For construction involving disturbance greater than five acres of land,the District will incorporate
into contract specifications the following requirements:
The District will comply with the RWQCB requirements of the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction
Activity. The District will require that the contractor implement control measures that are consistent with the General Permit and with the
recommendations and policies of the RWQCB. This would include submitting a Notice of Intent and site map to the RWQCB,developing a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan,and implementing site-specific best management practices to prevent sedimentation to surface waters.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Implement BMPs. Maintain compliance with SWMP for OCSD As needed.
2. Implement SWMP. administrative record.
3. Periodically update SWMP.
4. Implement mitigation measures listed Maintain record of site inspections.
above.
5. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Impact 6.7-2: Pile driving and excavation activities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 may encounter groundwater,and local
dewatering may be required. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.7-2a: Groundwater Dewatering. Construction contractors will comply with the District's Dewatering Specifications.
Measure 6.7-2b: Dewatering Discharge. Water from dewatering operations will be disposed of in a suitable manner in conformance with the NPDES
permit, as approved by the RWQCB.
OCSDS.em .Plm B-21 ESA I96M36
Miugni.M.m.n .and RlP ,Pager 0n.M,19"
ATTACHMENT B, MrrIGAT1ON MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Update dewatering procedures Maintain record of dewatering procedures OCSD During construction.
periodically. for administrative record
2. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Maintain record of site inspections.
Impact 6.7-3: Reclamation Plant No 1. and Treatment Plant No. 2 are located in the 100-year flocdplain of the Santa Ana River. New facilities proposed
under any of the scenarios considered would expose structures and people to a 100-year flood event and/or effects of a tsunami. Less than Significant With
Mitigation Measures,
Measure 6.7-3a: Chemical Spills During Floods. The District shall construct and maintain secondary containment berms to protect against release of
toxic chemicals in an event of a spill from flooding.
Measure 6.7-3b: Coordination with COE. The District shall coordinate with the Army Corp of Engineers to ensure levees located adjacent to
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 continue to provide adequate protection for a 100-year flood event.
Measure 6.7-3c: Hazard Awareness Notification. The District shall adhere to the Emergency Contingency Plan and the Flood Protection Plan to
minimize the affects of flooding and tsunamis to Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.2. These measures shall include hazard awareness
notifications to neighborhoods downstream from Reclamation Plant No. 1.
Measure 6.7-3d: Flood Protection.The District shall adhere to Orange County's flood protection program as implemented by the Orange County Flood
Control District.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Comply with programs listed in Maintain record of communication with OCSD On going.
mitigation measures. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
County Flood Control District for
administrative record.
OCSn Suueye Plan B -22 ESAI%NM
MiuyJion Ma�tibnng and Repo�inp Pmpun Oaoxr im
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Hazardous Materials
Impact 6.9-1: Increasing quantities of hazardous materials stored on site could impact public health in the event of a catastrophic spill or explosion.
Increasing liquid oxygen storage could increase the hazard. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 6.9-1s: Worker Safety Training. Worker safety training shall emphasize hazards of liquid oxygen and stored methane. Routine safety
measures including hazard communication shall be adapted and strictly enforced in hazardous areas. Hazard training and communication shall include
laboratory operations and routine process chemical use.
Measure 6.9-1b: Oxygen Facility Safety. If additional liquid oxygen storage facilities are installed,the District shall research explosion and fire
potential to determine explosion arc perimeters. If neighboring land uses are not adequately distant, the District shall reconfigure the oxygen storage
facility to remove explosion hazards on neighboring land uses.
Measure 6.9-Ic: Risk Management Program. Liquid oxygen operations shall be included in the District's Risk Management Program.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Maintain and periodically update Risk Maintain training records, medical OCSD On going.
Management Program. records,notification records, and safety
2. Maintain and periodically update record for administrative record.
worker safety program.
3. Implement mitigation measures listed
above.
4. Conduct monthly and annual safety
inspections.
Cumulative
Impact 6.11-1: Cumulative impacts to air quality and noise could occur as a result of treatment facility construction activities coupled with the construction
of the GWR System treatment facilities. Significant unavoidable.
Measure 6.11-la: Construction Coordination with OCWD. Coordinate construction activities with OCWD to minimize PMIG emissions, construction
vehicle exhaust, and cumulative noise impacts during excavation and pile driving activities.
OCSDSvuegiv Plu, B -23 ESA I96 M
Miligenm M..nng and Rip 'Pm'— Odoa r1999
ATTACHMENT R, MMGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include air emissions restrictions and Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction.
standard operating procedures for for administrative record.
construction work in contract
specifications.
2. Conduct oversight of construction
activities to ensure scope of work is
carried out.
Growth-Inducement
Impact II-I: By removing wastewater treatment capacity as one barrier to growth,the District would have indirect,growth-inducement potential to
support planned development within the Service Area that is consistent with and within the levels of development approved in the adopted General Plans.
Less the Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 11-1a: Phased Construction. The project's phased design helps minimize growth inducement potential. The Strategic Plan allows for the
incremental expansion of treatment capacity,allowing Service Area cities to reevaluate and revise long-term needs before completing full"build out."
Measure l l-lb: Lower Flow Projections. The District revises its Strategic Plan periodically allowing the treatment facilities to best meet the actual
needs of the Service Area. The implementation of this Strategic Plan was based on a projected decrease influent flow and serves to decrease anticipated
capacity requirements. Future revisions every five years will assist the District in maintaining service for reasonably foreseeable planned growth levels.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Phase construction of new facilities as Begin update Strategic Plan in 2004. OCSD Begin in 2004.
outlined in the Strategic Plan.
2. Review and incorporate growth
predictions every five years.
3. Update Strategic Plan periodically.
Impact 11-1: The OCSD Strategic Plan would accommodate planed growth in the Service Area. Implementation of planned growth would result in
secondary environmental effects. The effects of planned growth have been identified and addressed in the EIRs on Regional Plans,General Plans for
ocso scamyanm B-24 Esni Num
MitirtlimMeeiuring mJ Repmling ITopem Oa ,IM
ATTACHMZNTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Service Area cities,and associated Specific Plans. Some of the secondary effects of growth which have been identified as significant and unavoidable
include air quality and traffic congestion.
Measure I I-2: Growth Mitigation Measures. OCSD does not have the authority to make land use and development decisions,nor does it have the
authority or jurisdiction to address many of the identified significant,secondary effects of planned growth. Authority to implement such measures lies
with the County and cities which enforce local,state,and federal regulations through the permit process. Other agencies with authority to require
mitigation or with responsibility to implement measures to mitigate the effects of planned growth include regional and state agencies such as the South
Coast Air Quality management District(SCAQMD),Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB), California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG),California Department of Health Services(DHS),California Department of Transportation(Caltrans),and federal agencies including U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service(USFWS),U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA),and the U.S. Corps of Engineers(USACE).
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Phase construction of new facilities as Begin update Strategic Plan in 2004. OCSD Begin in 2004.
outlined in the Strategic Plan.
2. Review and incorporate growth
predictions every five years.
3. Update Strategic Plan periodically.
Collection System
Land Use
Impact 7.1-1: Construction activities associated with the trunk sewer systems would involve the rehabilitation and replacement of existing pipelines.
Construction activities would result in short-temr disturbance of adjacent land uses. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.1-1a: Construction Hours. The District will comply with local ordinances and restrict construction activities to daylight hours or m
specified in encroachment permits.
Measure 7.1-lb: Construction Notification. The District shall post notices or provide notification of construction activities to adjacent property owners
(including homeowners and adjacent businesses)at least 72 hours in advance of construction and provide a contact and phone number of a District staff
person to be contacted regarding questions or concerns about construction activity.
Measure 7.1-1c: Emergency Services Access. The District shall coordinate with officials of adjacent fire station,the Fountain Valley Regional Hospital
as well as other hospital to ensure that 24-hour emergency access is available.
DCSD Str Stc Plm B-25 ESA/% M
MNg m MmwnnB and Reporting P Fm Octo4 Ira
ATTACHMINT B. MTTTGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.1-1d: Covered Trenches. To minimize disruption of access to driveways to adjacent land uses,the District or its contractor(s)shall maintain
steel-trench plates at the construction sites to restore access across open trenches. Construction trenches in streets will not be left open after work hours.
Measure 7.1-le: Signage. The District shall provide temporary signage indicating that businesses are open.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local Maintain record of signage, business and OCSD Prior to and during construction
concoction ordinances in construction fire department notifications, inspections,
specifications including site safety and concoction schedule.
during non concoction hours.
2. Include the preparation and distribution
of notifications prior to construction
activities in wntract specifications.
3. Include 24-hour emergency access in
contract specifications.
4. Maintain record of communication
with local authorities.
5. Include signage for impacted
businesses in contract specifications.
6. Conduct periodic construction site
inspections.
Traffic
Impact 7.2.1: Construction activities during trenching in city streets will impact traffic circulation during construction period. Less than Significant with
Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.2-1 a: Traffic Control Plans. Traffic:control plans will be prepared by a qualified professional engineer,prior to the construction phase of
each sewer line project as implementation proceeds.
Measure 7.2-Ib: Alternative Routes. Traffic control plans will consider the ability of alternative routes to carry additional traffic and identify the least
disruptive hours of construction site truck access routes,and the type and location of warning signs, lights and other traffic control devices. Consideration
will be given to maintaining access to commercial parking lots,private driveways and sidewalks,bikeways and equestrian trails,to the greatest extent
feasible.
mm Suu .Plm B-26 ESA/M"M
A,ti mM*mWe Band acpv nP gm rlao Im
ATTACHMENT& MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.2-1c: Encroachment Permits. Encroachment permits for all work within public rights-of-way will be obtained from each involved agency
prior to commencement of any construction. Agencies involved include Caltrans,the Orange County Planning and Development Services(PDS)
(Development Services Section)and the various cities where work will occur. The District will comply with traffic control requirements,as identified by
Caltrans and the affected local jurisdictions.
Measure 7.2-Id: Traffic Control Plans. Traffic control plans will comply with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook and/or the Manual of Traffic
Controls as determined by each affected local agency,to minimize any traffic and pedestrian hazards that exist during project construction.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Contract with qualified traffic control Maintain traffic control plan,permits,and OCSD Prior to and during concoction
engineer to prepare Control Plan for construction schedule and methods for
each construction project. administrative record.
2. Ensure that issues highlighted in
mitigation measures are included in Maintain record of site inspections
Control Plan. including post-construction inspections.
3. Include within contract specifications
the acquisition of all necessary
encroachment permits.
4. Review list of required permits and
verify adequacy prior to concoction.
5. Conduct periodic site inspections
including postoompletion inspection.
Measure 7.2-1e: Traffic Disruption Avoidance. The construction technique for the implementation of the proposed sewer lines,such as tunneling,cut
and cover with partial street closure,or cut and cover with full street closure, shall include consideration of the ability of the roadway system, both the
street in question and alternate routes,to carry existing traffic volumes during project construction. If necessary,adjacent parallel streets will be selected
as alternate alignments for the proposed sewer improvements. As required by local jurisdictions,trunk sewers will be jacked under select major
intersections,to avoid traffic disruption and congestion.
Measure 7.2-1f: Street Closures Public streets will generally be kept operational during construction,particularly in the morning and evening peak
hours of traffic. Lane closures will be minimized during peak traffic hours.
Measure 7.2-1g: Roadway Restoration. Public roadways will be restored to a condition mutually agreed to between the District and local jurisdictions
prior to concoction.
=Dfttl icmw B-27 ESA/9 36
Mitigrtim Moubrirg c6 P.egming Pmpun Dndcr 1999
ATTACHWNT R. MMGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.2-Ih: Sewer Construction Coordination. The Districts will attempt to schedule construction of relief facilities to occurjointly with other
public works projects already planned in the affected locations,through careful coordination with all local agencies involved.
Measure 7.2-1i: Emergency Services. Emergency service purveyors will be contacted and consulted to preclude the creation of unnecessary traffic
bottlenecks that will seriously impede response times. Additionally, measures to provide an adequate level of access to private properties shall be
maintained to allow delivery of emergency services.
Measure 7.2-1 j: OCTA Coordination. OCTA will be contacted when construction affects roadways that are part of the OCTA bus network.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include adherence to the Traffic Maintain traffic control plan,permits,and OCSD Prior to and during construction
Control Plan in contract specifications construction schedule and methods for
2. Contact local authorities listed in administrative record.
mitigation measures and maintain
record of communication. Maintain record of site inspections
3. Conduct periodic site inspections including post-oonstruction inspections.
including post-completion inspection.
Measure 7.2-Ik: Railroad Encroachment Procedures. This measure is applicable to the following collection systems improvements: Lower Santa
Ana River Interceptor Improvements,Newhope-Placentia Trunk Replacement,and Gisler-Redhill System Improvements—B. To reduce impacts to
railroad rights-of-way,the District is required to follow the Right-of-Way Encroachment Approval Procedures—SCRRA Form No. 36. The procedures
for temporary encroachment calls for 1)the submittal of a written statement on the reason and location of the encroachment; 2)a completed and executed
SCRRA Form No. 6, Right-of-Entry Agreement; 3)plan check,inspection,and flagging fees;and 4)insurance certificates as described in the Right-of-
Entry Agreement. Per SCRRA Form No. 6,the District must comply with the rules and regulations of this agreement at all times when working on
SCRRA property,including those outlined in the"Rules and Requirements for Construction at Railway Property, SCRRA Form No. 37"and General
Safety Regulations for Construction/Maintenance Activity on Railway Property",
OCSDSvucgic Plan B-28 aSAf9 36
Miugetim Monibn�mdaepoNnB Rogrun 0.a ,IM
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Include application for SCRRA Maintain encroachment permit OCSD and SCRRA Prior to and during construction
encroachment permit in contract application and permit for administrative
specifications record.
2. Contact SCRRA prior to project
design.
Measure 7.1-11: Trails and Bikeways. Short term construction impacts and closures to locally designated trails and bikeways, as found in the County's
Master Plan of Regional Riding and Hiking Trails (RANT)and Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan(CBSP),shall be mitigated with detours,signage,
Bagmen and reconstruction as appropriate. Long term impacts such as permanent trail link closures should be mitigated with provisions for new rights-of-
way for trails and/or bikeways and reconstruction.
Measure 7.2-Im: County of Orange Coordination. Any construction plans that could potentially impact regional riding and hiking trails or Class I
bikeways shall be submitted to the County's Division of Harbors, Beaches and Parks/Trails Planning and Implementation for review and approval prior to
project construction activities.
Measure 7.2-1n: Trails Restoration. Regional Riding and Hiking Trails and Class I Bikeways impacted by construction activities shall be restored to
their original condition after project construction.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Include adherence with County of Maintain construction design for OCSD and SCRRA Prior to and during construction
Orange RRHT and CBSP in contract administrative record.
specifications.
2. Contact County of Orange prior to
designing detours.
WSDSVY .Plan B-29 FSA/96.36
A4,.m Mo,tibring end Reporting PW. .no r1999
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Biology
Impact 7.3-1: Based on conceptual alignment information for OCSD's proposed collection system projects,construction of the collection pipeline system
improvements would occur in previously disturbed,developed areas,primarily public streets. No impact to biological resources would occur if projects
occur within paved areas. However,if final project alignments are revised to include an undeveloped area or open space,potential impacts to biological
resource could occur; in these cases OCSD would conduct additional CEQA as needed to clarify and address impacts to biological resources.
Measure 7.3-1: Additional CEQA Review. If in the future,as OCSD develops the design of each specific collection system project for implementation,
a project alignment includes unpaved, undeveloped park or open space area,OCSD will conduct additional CEQA review as needed to clarify and address
potential impacts to biological resources.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Biological surveys will be conducted Maintain record of previous condition for OCSD Prior to and during construction
for construction activities in previously each construction site for administrative
undisturbed locations. record.
Noise
Impact 7.4-1: Construction activities related to the proposed collection system improvements would intermittently and temporarily generate noise levels
above existing ambient levels in the project vicinity. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.4-1a: Hours of Construction. Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. and as necessary to
comply with local ordinances. Any nighttime or weekend construction activities would be subject to local permitting.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight Prior to and during construction
and construction ordinances in for administrative record. OCSD
construction specifications.
2. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
0C9D Sv"ic P1= B -30 ESA19.m
Mitiptl,m Motibrinp and Repmti,yfloQsm October 1999
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.4-1 b: Noise Control. All equipment used during construction shall be muffled and maintained in good operating condition. All internal
combustion engine driven equipment shall be fitted with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction
and construction ordinances in for administrative record.
construction specifications.
2. Include noise reduction procedures in
construction specifications
3. Provide construction oversight to
ensure scope of work is carried out.
Measure 7.4-1c: Pile-Driving Noise Reduction. Contractors shall use vibratory pile drivers instead of conventional pile drivers where feasible and
effective in reducing impact noise from shoring ofjack-pit locations in close proximity to residential areas,where applicable.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include preference to avoid pilings Maintain record of design specifications. OCSD Prior to project design
where possible in project design
specifications.
Measure 7.4-1d: Construction Notification. Sensitive receptors affected by pipeline replacement projects, and manhole rehabilitation activities shall be
notified concerning the project timing and construction schedule, and shall be provided with a phone number to call with questions or complaints.
CCSD S4Y &Plm B-31 EM/96.36
M ,,g =MomwnngmdR pt &Rog= 00.obn 19W
ATTACHMENT& MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
L Prepare and distribute notifications. Maintain record of notification OCSD Prior to construction
distribution list.
Air Ouality
Impact 75-1: The proposed improvements to OCSD's collection systems would generate short-term emissions of air pollutants,including dust and criteria
pollutants,from excavation, installation and/or replacement activities. This is considered a short-term significant impact that would cease at the completion
of concoction activities. Construction emission impacts are estimated to occur for an average of three to four weeks within one block of any given
property. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.6-1a: Dust Control. The District shall require the contractors to implement a dust abatement program that would reduce fugitive dun generation to lessen
impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.The dust abatement program could include the following measures:
• Water all active construction sites at least twice daily.
• Cover all trucks having soil,sand,or other loose material or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
• Apply water as necessary,or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at concoction sites.
• Sweep daily(with water sweepers)all paved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.
• Sweep daily(with water sweepers)if visible soil material is carried into adjacent streets.
• Water twice daily or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed soil stockpiles.
• Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Conduct mitigation measures to reduce Maintain record of construction methods OCSD Prior to and during construction
concoction air emissions. for administrative record.
2. Conduct periodic construction site
inspections. Maintain record of site inspections for
administrative record.
Measure 7.5-lb: Exhaust Emissions. Contractors shall maintain equipment engines in proper working order and operate construction equipment so as
to minimize exhaust emissions. Such equipment shall not be operated during first or second stage smog alerts.
CCSDSuslegic Plm B-32 Hs r96 M
MUp6m MomW gmd Rep ngP V= Mohr 19"
ATTACHMENT R. MMGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.5-1c: Truck Emissions Reductions. During construction,trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues shall be kept with their engines
off,when not in use,to reduce vehicle emissions. Construction activities shall be discontinued during second-stage smog alerts.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include air emission reduction Maintain record of construction OCSD Prior to construction
mitigation measures in construction specifications and site inspections for
specifications. administrative record.
2. Conduct periodic site inspections to
verify adherence to mitigation
measures.
Geoloev
Impact 7.6-1: Project facilities would be located in areas susceptible to primary and secondary seismic hazards(groundshaking,liquefaction,settlement).
Damage to facilities could result in the event of a major earthquake. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.6-1a: Seismic Safety. The District will design and concoct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or
exceed seismic,design standards in the most recent edition of the California Building Code.
Measure 7.6-lb: Soils Survey. Soils surveys shall be conducted to determine the liquefaction potential along the collection system improvements route.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Use design criteria to reduce seismic Maintain record of concoction OCSD Prior to construction
hazards. specifications and geotechnical
2. Contract with qualified geologist to information.
conduct geotechnical evaluations prior
to construction.
WSD fttlgic R= B-33 EM/96 M
Wg4m),Ic mi,,=daep~ 0ade/1999
ATTACHMENTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Hvdrolotry
Impact 7.7-1: Construction activities could result in erosion and siltation into nearby surface waters, leading to degradation of water quality or flooding
hazards. Construction could also result in chemical spills (e.g., fuels,oils, or grease)to stormwater, and increase turbidity and decrease water quality in
waters of the U.S. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.7-1a: Contractor BMPs. Construction contractors will implement Best Management Practices to prevent erosion and sedimentation to avoid
significant adverse impacts to surface water quality.
Measure 7.7-lb: Storm Season Restrictions. In addition, open-trench installation of pipelines across open drainage channels and the interplant
connector shall be limited to the dry season.
Measure 7.7-1c: County of Orange Coordination. The District shall coordinate with the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department
(Orange County Flood Control District) Planning Section to ensure compatibility and joint use feasibility with existing and future projects.
Measure 7.7-1 d: Waterway Protection. The District shall incorporate into contract specifications the requirement that the contractor(s)enforce strict
on-site handling rules to keep construction and maintenance materials out of receiving waters. The rules will include measures to:
• Store all reserve fuel supplies only within the confines of a designated construction staging area.
• Refuel equipment only within designated construction staging area.
• Regularly inspect all construction vehicles for leaks.
Measure 7.7-le: Spill Prevention. The District shall incorporate into contract specifications the requirement that the contractor(s)prepare a Spill
Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan. The plan would include measures to be taken in the event of an accidental spill.
Measure 7.7-If: Spill Containment. The District shall incorporate into contract specifications the requirement that the construction staging areas be
designed to contain contaminants such as oil,grease, and fuel products so that they do not drain towards receiving waters or storm drain inlets. If heavy-
duty construction equipment is stored overnight adjacent to a potential receiving water,drip pans will be placed beneath the machinery engine block and
hydraulic systems.
OCSDSua io Plan B-34 ESAI%.36
Mitigetiw Norvwnng mE R<pmtiry Program oaohr 1Wi
ATTACHMENT& MITIGATION MONITI)MG/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
L Implement BMPs of State-wide Maintain compliance with SWMP and OCSD On going
SWPPP. SPCC for administrative record.
2. Prepare construction SWPPP for sites Including annual reports to the SWRCB.
greater than 5 acres.
3. Implement existing SWMP and SPCC. Maintain record of site inspections and
4. Periodically update SWMP and SPCC. sample analysis results.
5. Provide adequate spill prevention and
surface water management SOPs in
contract specifications.
6. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Measure 7.7-Ig: Flood Control Facilities. The District will contact the Orange County Flood Control District prior to excavation activities involved
with the construction of the interplant connector to ensure the integrity of the flood control system along the Santa Ana River.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Contract with qualified engineer to Maintain reports for administrative OCSD Prior to construction of interplant
assess structural impacts to SAR levee record. connector.
prior to construction of interplant
connector. Maintain record of site inspections.
2. Periodically inspect construction site.
Public Services
Impact 7.8-1: Construction of the collection pipeline system could result in short-term disruption of emergency services in the vicinity of the project area.
Less than significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.8-1a: Traffic Control Plan Notifications. The contractor shall provide a copy of the Traffic Control Plan to the Sheriffs Department local
police departments and fire departments prior to construction. The District shall provide 72-hour notice of construction to the local service providers of
individual pipeline segments.
CCSDSV i.Plm B-35 ESA/9W 36
Mingo me MONbnngend Reportinghagrem Onobee 1999
ATTACHMENT B. MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.8-lb: Emergency Facility Access. Access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities must be maintained on a 24-hour basis and at
least one access to medical facilities shall be available at any one time during construction. The District shall notify appropriate officials at the impacted
medical facility regarding construction schedule.
Measure 7.8-1c: Trench Openings. Trenches shall be promptly backfilled after pipeline installation. If installation is incomplete,steel trench plates
shall be used to cover open trenches.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include site safety measures in contract Maintain record of notifications for OCSD During construction
specifications. administrative record.
2. Notify local authorities of construction
schedule. Maintain record of site inspections.
3. Maintain access to emergency facilities
during construction activities including
during non-work hours.
4. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Impact 7.8-2: Construction of the collection system projects would create a public safety hmrd in the vicinity of the construction area. Less than
Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.8-2a: Pedestrian Safety. Construction contractors shall ensure that adequate barriers would be established to prevent pedestrians from
entering open trenches of an active construction area. Warnings shall also be posted sufficient distances from the work area to allow pedestrians to cross
the street at controlled intersections rather than having to jaywalk.
Measure 7.8-2b: Equipment Security. Construction contractors shall be responsible for providing appropriate security measures,including the
provision of security guards, for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for the project.
Measure 7.8-2c: Construction Refuse. Construction contractors shall dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations. Contractors shall
not be permitted to dispose of construction debris in residential or business containers.
OC9D S4xeaie Plcn B-36 a6A/960336
Mitigetim Mooibnn8 m6acWnfNPm®+� 0.o '19"
ATTACHMENT R, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include site safety measures in contract Maintain specifications for administrative OCSD Prior to and during construction.
specifications. record.
2. Include waste disposal methods in
construction specifications. Maintain record of site inspections.
3. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Impact 7.8-3: Construction of the collection pipeline system could result in short-teml disruption of utility service and may require utilities relocation.
Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.8-3a: Utility Search. A detailed study identifying utilities along the pipeline routes shall be conducted during the design stages of the project.
For segments with adverse impacts the following mitigations shall be implemented.
• Utility excavation or encroachment permits shall be required from the appropriate agencies. These permits include measures to minimize utility
disruption. The District and its contractors shall comply with permit conditions and such conditions shall be included in construction contract
specifications.
• Utility locations shall be verified through field survey.
• Detailed specifications shall be prepared as part of the design plans to include procedures for the excavation,support,and fill of areas around utility
cables and pipes. All affected utility services would be notified of the District's construction plans and schedule. Arrangements shall be made with
these entities regarding protection, relocation,or temporary disconnection of services.
Measure 7.8-3b: Utility Conflicts. In order to reduce potential impacts associated with utility conflicts, the following measures should be implemented
in conjunction with 7.8-3a.
• Disconnected cables and lines would be promptly reconnected.
• The District shall observe Department of Health Services (DHS)standards which require a 10-foot horizontal separation between parallel sewer and
water mains; (2)one foot vertical separation between perpendicular water and sewer line crossings. In the event that the separation requirements
cannot be maintained, the District shall obtain DHS variance through provisions of water encasement,or other means deemed suitable by DHS;and (3)
encasing water mains in protective sleeves where a new sewer force main crosses under or over an existing sewer main.
Measure 7.8-3c: Protect Utilities. The construction contractor shall comply with District requirements and specification to protect existing utility lines.
DCSD Svc ,.c Plan B-37 ES/I%.36
M fi,.-Mo,tianng end Reporting Program Wno r1W,
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING I REPORTING PROGRAM
Measure 7.8-3d: Agency Coordination. The District should coordinate with the Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department,Orange
County Flood Control District, Planning Section, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Municipal Water District of Orange County,Coastal
Municipal Water District,and Orange County Water District,and affected jurisdictions to ensure compatibility and joint use feasibility with existing
future projects.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
I. Implement mitigation measures listed Maintain specifications for administrative OCSD Prior to and during construction.
above. record.
2. Include underground utility surveys in
construction specifications. Maintain record of site inspections.
3. Coordinate with local authorities to
minimize utility disruption.
4. Periodically inspect construction sites.
Measure 7.8-3e: Identify Abandoned Oil Wells. Prior to construction,the District shall identify existing and abandoned oil production wells within the
project arm using the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil,Gas,and Geothermal Resources(DOGGR),District I well location maps.
Access to identified non-abandoned oil wells will be maintained. Previously abandoned wells identified beneath proposed structures or utility corridors
may need to be plugged to current DOGGR specifications including adequate gas venting systems.
Measure 7.8-3f: Abandon Wells. Should construction activities uncover previously unidentified oil production wells,the DOGGR will be notified,and
the well will be abandoned following DOGGR specifications for well abandonment. -
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include existing and abandoned oil Maintain specifications for administrative OCSD Prior to and during construction.
well surveys in construction record.
specifications.
2. Coordinate with Department of Maintain record of oil well discoveries
Conservation to expedite search. and searches for the administrative record.
=DSVe .e Plu 13-38 ESA/9 36
M 8ti mMm nns Md Repm "J"V= oaob'19"
ATTACHAIENTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTINGPROGRAM
Aesthetics
Impact 7.9-1: Project implementation could result in short-term visual impacts resulting from construction activities. Less than Significant after Mitigation
Measures.
Measure 7.9-1a: Construction Site Restoration.The District shall ensure that its contractors restore disturbed areas along the pipeline alignment to a
condition mutually agreed to between the District and local jurisdictions prior to construction such that short-term construction disturbance does not result
in long-term visual impacts.
Measure 7.9-lb: Construction Housekeeping. Construction contractors shall be required to keep construction and staging areas orderly, free of trash
and debris.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include construction site house- Maintain specifications for administrative OCSD Prior to and during construction.
keeping measures in contract record.
specifications.
1 Conduct post-construction site Maintain record of site inspections.
inspections.
Cultural Resources
Impact 7.10-1: Implementation of the proposed collection system improvements may affect known,significant archaeological resources. Less than
Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.10.1: Archaeological Surveys. During project design,within the area of the 6 recorded archaeological sites within proposed project
alignments,a qualified archaeologist shall conduct a subsurface testing program to determine whether intact significant deposits exist in the excavation
area. Shall testing indicate that areas of significant deposits do exist,the deposits would be preserved in place,if feasible. If preservation in place is not
feasible,a Data Recovery Plan would be prepared to address the removal of those deposits and would be implemented before the beginning of
construction. The Plan would define how and when mechanical and manual excavation would be conducted,the anticipated volume of recovered soils,
artifact analysis,cataloging and curation,and monitoring and reporting requirements. For the three sites where human remains have been recorded(CA-
ORA-85, CA-ORA-87,and CA-ORO-300),the District would enter into a written agreement between an archaeological consultant,to be retained by the
District,and a Native American representative prior to construction in the vicinity of these sites. This agreement would specify terms as to the treatment
and disposition of the human remains,and shall define"associated burial goods"with reference to Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94,5097.98,and
5097.99 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5.
OCSD soft®.P1. B-39 E 1.36
AGUSNm M.wbaog and atPmY.e Nv6tm Octdn 1999
ATTACHMENTB, MITIGATIONMONRORING1 REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Contract with a qualified archaeologist Maintain construction specifications for OCSD Prior to and during concoction.
to conduct pre-construction site administrative record.
surveys in area with a high probability
of cultural resources. Maintain record of site inspections.
2. Include necessary actions in
specifications shall archaeological
artifacts be discovered during
concoction activities.
3. Conduct post-construction site
inspections.
Impact 7.10-2: Implementation of the proposed collection system improvements may affect unknown,potentially significant archeological resources. Less
than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.10-2a:Archaeological Resources. Subsurface construction has a low to very high potential for exposing significant subsurface cultural
resources. Due to the likelihood of encountering cultural resources,the District shall implement the following prior to project construction:
• Language shall he included in the General Specifications section of any subsurface construction cataracts alerting the contractor to the potential for
subsurface cultural resources and trespassing on known or potential resources adjacent to the project.
• Prior to construction,contractors and District staff will receive an archaeological orientation from a professional archaeologist regarding the types of
resources which may be uncovered and how to identify these resources during construction activities. The orientation shall also cover procedures to
follow in the case of any archaeological discovery.
Measure 7.10.2b: Cultural Resources. If cultural resources are encountered at any time during project excavation,concoction personnel would avoid
altering these materials and their context until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the situation. Project personnel would not collect or retain cultural
resources. Prehistoric resources include,but are not limited to,chert or obsidian flakes,projectile points,mortars,and pestles;and dark, friable soil
containing shell and bone,dietary debris,heat-affected rock, or human burials. Historic resources include stone or adobe foundations or walls;structures
and remains with square nails;and refuse deposits(glass,metal,wood ceramics),often found in old wells and privies.
Measure 7.10-2c: Human Remains Alert. In the event of accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the County Coroner would be
notified immediately and construction activities shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage
Commission would be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission shall be adhered to in the treatment and
disposition of the remains.
OCSDStr egivAm B-4B ESAI9 36
Miuguim Mmim gmdaepo MPS De96a 19"
ATTACHMENT A. MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
L Implement the mitigation measures Maintain construction specifications for OCSD Prior to and during construction.
listed above. administrative record.
2. Contract with a qualified archaeologist
to conduct pre-construction site Maintain record of site inspections.
surveys for areas with a high
probability of cultural resources.
3. Include necessary actions in
specifications shall archaeological
artifacts be discovered during
construction activities.
Cumulative
Impact 7.11-1: Construction activities of the collection system projects in conjunction with other projects would result in short-term cumulative impacts.
Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 7.11-1a: Coordinate Construction. The District will continue to coordinate construction activities with the county and city public works and
planning departments and other local agencies to identify overlapping pipeline routes,project areas,and construction schedules. To the extent feasible,
construction activities shall be coordinated to consolidate the occurrence of short-term construction-related impacts.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Coordinate with local authorities prior Maintain record of communication and OCSD Prior to construction.
to final design. outreach with local authorities for
2. Conduct coordination incentives with administrative record.
local jurisdictions.
Measure 7.11-1b: Recycling. To reduce cumulative impacts related to solid waste,the District shall make all practicable efforts to recycle where
feasible.
O DSV ,e M- B-41 ESA196 36
Mitigetim,Me�dunr�g and Repining Rogrun O..M 109
ATTACHMENT B, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Where feasible,include recycling Maintain record of soils hauling. OCSD Prior to construction.
measures in construction contracts.
2. Conduct site surveys to ensure scope of Maintain record site surveys for
work is followed. administrative record.
Biosolids
Impact 8-2:The projected increase in residual solids volumes would increase truck traffic on local roadways. Less than Significant with Mitigation.
Measure 8.2: Trucking Impact Reduction. The District shall limit truck trips associated with the transport of residual solids to off-peak hours when
possible as a means of reducing truck travel times and minimizing congestion impacts to the regional transportation system.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include preferred schedule in contracts Maintain record of contract for OCSD On going
with haulers. administrative record.
Impact 8-3: The projected increase in residual solids volumes and related truck traffic would increase ambient noise levels at nearby sensitive receptor
locations. Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures.
Measure 8-3a: Truck Noise Reduction. The District shall limit truck trips associated with the transport of residual solids at Treatment Plant No. 2 to
non-noise sensitive(daytime)and non-peak hour periods as a means of reducing exposure of residences to truck-related noise whenever possible.
Measure 8-3b: Biosolids Transport. The District shall investigate options for reducing the number of biosolids truck trips at Treatment Plant No. 2.
The study could focus on evaluating such practices as using underground pipelines to pump biosolids from Plant 2 up to Plant 1.
OGSe S..&Plm B-42 ESA 196.36
Mitigaim Mmwms and R.pwt�P V m Oa.b,19"
ATTACHMENTB, MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Include preferred schedule in contract Maintain record of contract for OCSD On going
with haulers. administrative record.
Impact 8-5: The projected increase in biosolids production from POTWs in the Southern California region could present a cumulative impact on the
availability of land application sites. Less than Significant with Mitigation.
Measure 8-5a: Biosulids Application Sites. The District will continue to research land application sites in the region and consider the management
options including the acquisition of dedicated application sites.
Measure 8-5b: Biosolids Land Application. The District will continue to coordinate with other POTWs in the region to cooperatively research
innovative ways to solve land availability issues.
MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY MONITORING SCHEDULE
1. Continue research and efforts to Maintain record of research and efforts OCSD On going
increase land application. for administrative record.
2. Coordinate with POTWs in the region.
C 1TEMPNMRP tar Resolution aa-eX-Anachment B.Eoc
OCSDSeu cPlan B-43 ESA/96W36
M ug0 9a Mowwnns and Rcp np Pmpem O .o r1999
ATTACHMENT C.
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCERNING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
aev.m.ssx�A A-13 F4Afs m
ATTACIMENT C
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCERNING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guidelines Section 15091 as
amended January 1, 1999,the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)upon review of the
Final Environmental Impact Report(FEIR),including the comments and responses therein,and
based on all the information and evidence in the records,hereby makes the Findings set herein:
CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR"describe a range of reasonable alternatives
to the project or to the location of the project,which would feasibly attain most of the basic
objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of
the project..."(CEQA Guidelines 15126.6(a)If a project alternative will substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects of a proposed project,the decision maker should not approve
the proposed project unless it determines that specific economic, legal,social,technological,or
other considerations make the project infeasible. The findings with respect to alternatives to the
project identified in the EIR are described in this section.
REASONABLE RANGE OF ALTERNATIVES
The EIR analyzed a reasonable range of alternatives. Since the EIR constitutes a program-level
analysis of the District's long-term(2000)planning for it's entire system,alternatives are
considered for several different elements of OCSD's Strategic Plan. These elements include level
of treatment,plant expansion,peak wet weather management,collection system improvements,
water reclamation/reuse through the co-sponsorship program between OCSD and the Orange
County Water District(OCWD)for Phase 1 of the Groundwater Water Replenishment(GWR)
System Project,ocean disposal facilities,and residual solids/biosolids management.
Table 1 provides a matrix of the alternatives considered for each program element. The key
alternatives considered in this EIR,the six alternative treatment scenario and two altemative
discharge options,are evaluated at equal level of detail and are discussed in the main body of the
EIR. As described in the PEIR,the level of treatment alternatives analyzed include the following:
Action Scenarios
Scenario 1: NPDES Permit Compliance without GWR System Project. Provide a level
of treatment necessary to meet the NPDES permit conditions and the California Ocean
Plan. All wastewater would receive advanced primary treatment with a percentage also
receiving secondary treatment prior to ocean discharge. Under this Scenario, the GWR
OCSDamlmm X.AU C C-1 ESAIM06
System would not be implemented, thereby increasing the percentage of secondary effluent
available for ocean discharge. The amount of secondary treatment would be governed by
the NPDES permit limits.
• Scenario 2: NPDES Permit Compliance with GWR System Project. Provide the level
of treatment necessary to meet the NPDES permit conditions and the California Ocean
Plan. All wastewater would receive advanced primary treatment with a percentage also
receiving secondary treatment prior to ocean discharge. In coordination with OCWD, 50-
80 mgd average daily flow and up to 100 mild peak wet weather flow of secondary effluent
would be diverted from OCSD to the GWR System. The amount of secondary treatment in
the ocean discharge would be governed by needs of the GWR System and by the NPDES
permit limits.
• Scenario 3: Full Secondary Treatment without GWR System Project. Provide full
secondary treatment to all wastewater prior to ocean disposal. Under this Scenario, the
GWR System project would not be implemented. The capacity for secondary treatment
within both Plants I and 2 would be increased to accommodate projected peak flows. The
existing facilities would be optimized through flow diversions to minimize the construction
of new facilities.
• Scenario 4: Full Secondary Treatment with GWR System Project. Provide full
secondary treatment to all wastewater prior to ocean disposal. In coordination with
OCWD, 50-80 mgd average daily flow and up to 100 mgd peak wet weather flow of
secondary effluent would be diverted from OCSD to the GWR System. The capacity for
secondary treatment within both Plants 1 and 2 would be increased to accommodate
projected peak flows. The existing facilities would be optimized through flow diversions to
minimize the construction of new facilities.
No Proiect/Existing Conditions
• Scenario 5: 50:50 Blend without GWR System Project. Maintain the level of treatment
currently provided. All wastewater would receive advanced primary treatment with about
50 percent also receiving secondary treatment prior to ocean discharge. Under this
Scenario, the GWR System would not be implemented.
• Scenario 6: 50:50 Blend with GWR System Project. Maintain the level of treatment
currently provided. All wastewater would receive advanced primary treatment. In
coordination with OCWD, 50-80 mgd average daily flow and up to 100 mgd peak wet
weather flow of secondary effluent would be diverted from OCSD to the GWR System.
Half of the remaining ocean discharge would require secondary treatment.
SUMMARY OF COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES
DEIR Chapter 9.0,Alternatives describes other alternatives to the Preferred Project considered
during development of the Strategic Plan,shown on Table ES-10. DEIR Chapter 9.0 compares
the potential environmental impacts of the various project alternatives to those of the Preferred
Strategic Plan Alternative. Inmost cases,the alternatives for each of these system components
have similar construction and operation impacts and the same mitigation requirements. All
alternatives share the same three significant unavoidable impacts:
OCSD nm 9 X.A�C C-2 BSA f 966n6
• Significant noise, vibration and air quality impacts during construction at the treatment
plants.
• Significant air quality emissions from increased mobile sources (i.e., vehicles for deliveries
and hauling).
• Some of the secondary effects of growth planned by the cities and County land use agencies
within the District have been determined to be significant and unavoidable by those
agencies. These impacts include, but are not limited to, traffic congestion, air quality
impacts, and loss of open space.
Except for these significant unavoidable impacts that are common to each alternative,the impacts
associated with each alternative can be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. Thus,the
alternatives are not clearly distinguished by the number or type of significant impacts they
generate. The distinction among the alternatives is the degree of impact. Compared to the
Preferred Ateemative(Scenario 2),the alternatives do result in more or less of some of the
impacts.
Table ES-11 presents a brief summary of the key characteristics and impacts of each alternative.
Scenarios 1 and 2 require construction and operation of the fewest additional facilities,and
provide the least amount of secondary treatment facilities. Scenarios 3 and 4, Full Secondary,
require most additional facilities and provide the most secondary treatment(100 percent for all
flows). Scenario 2 and Scenario 4 bracket the low end and high end of the range of possible
project changes and therefore are the focus of the EIR analysis to assess the range of potential
impacts and benefits. Scenarios 5 and 6 represent the District's current policy to provide
sufficient secondary treatment facilities to maintain a 30:50 blend of primary and secondary
effluent for ocean discharge. The proposed actions and impacts of Scenarios 5 and 6 fall in
between those described for Scenarios 2 and 4. As illustrated in Table ES-11,the six treatment
scenario alternatives pose environmental impact tradeotfs regarding cross-media impacts to land,
air and water resources.
ocso amwm wox.A•.,amm.c C-3 esArsewss
TABLE ES-10: ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Treatment Level I Peak Wet Weather Residuals
Alternative Collection System Effluent Quality Water Reuse now Management Ocean Disposal Ma ement
PREFERRED • "Bees Case" - •Scenario 2-Produce Continue existing • Implement 13 mgd • Use existing 120- Continue existing
ALTERNATIVE Upsizing existing a blend of primary muse programs: emncrvalion by 2020. inch outfa8. beneficial reuse
trunk sewers. and secondary GAP and Telben • Implement 20% 1/1 • Use 78-inch outfa8 program for land
•Manhole rehab- effluent that meets saltwater intension reduction. for infrequent wet application of
ilitation. NPDES permit barrier. • Utilize and maximize weather discharge biosolld,to the
requirements for Implement GWR existing in-plant at an estimated extent possible.
ocmn discharge. System-Phase 1. storage. frequency of once Continue current
•Increase secondary • Participate in GIVES- every 3 years by program of landfill
treatment capacity to Phase 1. the year 2020, disposal for grit and
support GWR • Use 78-inch outfa8 for screenings.
System. infrequent wet wencher
discharge.
NO PROJECT •Similar collection •Produce a bland of 50 Continue existing • Comma and use a • Use existing 120- Continue beneficial
ALTERNATIVE projects to those of percent primary and use programs: new 120-inch motall. inch outfa8. now(land
(1989 Strategic Plan) Preferred Alternative. 50 percent secondary GAP and Talbert • Construct a one, application)of
effluent for ocean saltwater intrusion second 1204neh biosolida to the
discharge(Scenarios barrier. aNfall. extent possible.
5 and 6). • Continue landfill
disposal for grit and
.creenion.
Other Options •Construct Super •Produce 100 percent, • Do trot implement • Increase wastewater Connotes a new, Disposal of all
Studied Sewers: full secondary effluent GWR System. influent reductions 120-inch outfa8. bimolids in a
Super Bustard for ocean discharge through increased landfill.
Super SARI (Scenario,3 and d). conservation and Ifl
Super Newhope flow reduction beyond
Super Euclid that included in the
Preferred Altmssa&e.
• Increase storage at the • Comma a
•Construct upstream Wastewater Trestmenl parallel, 15,000-
storage facilities. Plants(W WTPs). foot barrel to the
existing 120-inch
outfa8 that
connects to the
diffboa-action.
• (Sce also Collection Discharge to the
System ahemath cs Santa Ana River
and Disposal for peak wet
altematfves,which weather emergency,
contribute to peak wd discharge.
weather flow
mane ent).
MSD geoNfim 99Ux.Aaah sstC C4 BA/96a136
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the Strategic Plan are:
(1) To plan for wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facilities to serve the needs of
the OCSD service area through 2020;
(2) To ensure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharge permit conditions,
including the requirements of the 301(h) modified (secondary treatment waiver) National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit for discharge;
(3) To recommend projects that meet the community's needs, protect public health, are
technically feasible, and are cost effective and environmentally responsible; and
(4) To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling.
PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
The Preferred Alternative in the 1999 Strategic Plan is Treatment Scenario 2—providing
sufficient secondary treahnent to meet the needs of the GWR System Project(Phase i for 50-80
mgd and 100 mild of peak flow)and maintaining compliance with NPDES permit requirements
for ocean discharge. In order to meet the treatment goals of this scenario,the Strategic Plan
identifies capital improvements for both the collection system and the treatment plants. In
conjunction with the preferred alternative,the District may be required to use the existing 78-inch
diameter outfall to accommodate emergency peak flows in excess of current discharge capacity.
Level of Treatment: Treatment Scenario 2 would provide the level of treatment necessary to
meet the NPDES permit conditions and the California Ocean Plan. All wastewater would receive
advanced primary treatment with a percentage also receiving secondary treatment prior to ocean
discharge. In coordination with OCWD, 50-80 mild average daily flow and up to 100 mild peak
wet weather flow of secondary effluent would be diverted from OCSD to the GWR System. The
amount of secondary treatment in the ocean discharge would be governed by needs of the GWR
System and by the NPDES permit limits.
Treatment Plant Expansion: Under treatment Scenario 2,all proposed additional treatment
facilities would be located within the existing property boundaries of the District's Reclamation
Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2. Figures 3-7 through 3-I 1 in the DEIR illustrate the
treatment plant expansion. Treatment Scenario 2 would require the least number of new facilities
of any of the alternatives analyzed.
Ocean Discharge:The existing 120-inch diameter outfall has adequate capacity to accommodate
dry weather flows to the year 2020 as shown in Figure 3-2 of the DEIR. The outfall would also
accommodate most wet weather flows using the combination of peak wet weather management
measures outlined on page S-16 of the DEIR. The existing I20-inch diameter outfall's rated
capacity of 480 mgd has been exceeded on five separate occasions since its installation in 1971,
reaching 550 mgd during a storm event in 1995. During each event,the outfall was able to
OCSD am 9 X.�C C-5 M/%&B6
accommodate all the effluent without requiring emergency discharge at either of the alternative
two discharge points. Due to increased development and projected population growth within the
service area,peak wet weather flows are estimated to reach 775 mgd by the year 2020(see
Section 3.4). To reconcile the discharge capacity deficiencies during peak flow periods,the
District will implement several measures to alleviate peak wet weather flow(DEIR S-16). As a
last resort,the District would use the existing 78-inch diameter outfall for infrequent peak flow
discharges. Modeling of wet weather flows in the system indicate that the need or probability of
use for the 78-inch to handle peak wet weather flow is greater today(three times in five years)
than it will be under the preferred project in the future(one time in three years). This is due in
part to the hydraulic relief provided by the GWR System,significantly reducing the need for peak
wet weather discharges to the near-shore.
Collection System: Based on the modeled pipeline deficiencies by the year 2020 within the
system,OCSD proposes to replace and rehabilitate pipelines to meet future needs and prevent
overflows. In addition,five pump stations were determined to be in need of equipment upgrades.
Nearly 47 miles of pipeline replacements(separated into 32 individual projects)are planned
almost exclusively within developed city streets. Open trench andjack-and-bore construction
would be employed.
Biosolids Program: The Strategic Plan recommends no immediate changes in the method of
biosolids processing or disposal,however,a number of studies of the system are proposed. The
Strategic Plan outlines several process changes which could potentially increase biosolids quality
and operational efficiency. None of these technologies are recommended for immediate
implementation,but the District will continue to play an active role in researching new
technologies and monitoring studies performed nation-wide. The District will need to develop
additional land applications for the projected increase in biosolids. The District will continue to
research land acquisitions dedicated to biosolids recycling.
NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE
The No Project Alternative for the OCSD strategic planning efforts would be continued
implementation of the District's existing adopted program from the 1989 Master Plan,including
continued treatment in accordance with the 50:50 blend policy and continued collection system
improvement and plant expansion to accommodate planned growth service needs. The CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15126.6(e)(3)(A)and(13)indicate that the No Project Alternative in certain
cases can be considered as the continuation of previously approved planning policies. In fight of
this CEQA guidance,this analysis has not considered the termination of capital improvements
planned in the 1989 Master Plan as an alternative,
Treatment Level: Treatment Scenarios 5 and 6,50:50 blend of advanced primary and secondary
effluent,represent the No Project Alternative in terms of treatment level. Scenario 6 incorporates
the GWR System Project Phase 1, Scenario 5 does not. Under the No Project Alternative the
District would continue this treatment level,which would comply with its current NPDES permit
for ocean discharge.
OCSD am 9 X.AWmmmlC C-6 BTAl9
Collection System: Under the No Project Alternative, OCSD would continue to improve the
collection system to eliminate conveyance deficiencies and handle wet-weather flows. About
half of the collection system projects included in the 1999 Strategic Plan are the same as those
previously analyzed and adopted as part of the 1989 Master Plan. Under the No Project
Alternative,collection system projects would have similar temporary community disruption
impacts as those proposed in the Preferred Alternative,although fewer trunk sewers would be
worked on. The District now has more current and accurate information about the collection
system deficiencies and therefore has identified additional projects to improve the system. Under
the No Project Alternative,without these additional system improvements,the risk of a sewage
spill within the collection system would increase,posing both a human health and environmental
health concern.
Water Reclamation:With respect to water reuse,the adopted 1989 Master Plan also
recommended the District's active participation in and expansion of water reuse projects. That
plan considered options for upstream,satellite water reclamation plants with local distribution
systems to support non-potable reuse throughout the service area. These options are no longer
under consideration. The GWR System Project concept had not been developed at the time of the
1989 Master Plan. However,given the District's adopted policy to support additional reuse, it is
reasonable to assume that under the No Project Altemative,the District would still participate
with OCWD in the development and implementation of the GWR System Project.
Ocean Discharge/Peak Wet Weather Management: With respect to ocean discharge and peak
wet-weather management,the 1989 Master Plan recommended construction of a second 120-inch
outfall as part of the longterm program. Therefore, under the No Project Alternative,the District
would continue to evaluate the timing and need for implementing this program component and
would initiate design studies when appropriate. Hydraulic modeling conducted by the District for
the Strategic Plan indicates that the 78-inch diameter outfall may be needed for hydraulic relief
during peak wet weather events under current conditions. In fact,the frequency of need is
statistically greater under current conditions than under projected conditions in the year 2020.
Implementation of the GWR System would provide hydraulic relief, significantly delaying the
need for peak wet weather discharges to the near-shore.
Biosolids Management: Under the No Project Alternative,the bicsolids management program
would be essentially the same. The Strategic Plan does not propose significant changes to the
current biosolids management policies.
Findings
The No Project Alternative is hereby rejected for the following reasons:
I. The No Project Alternative as described on page 9-6 of the DER would not avoid the
significant impacts to land-side resources associated with the Preferred Alternative
including air quality, energy resources, and land acreage for biosolids applications. In
fact, this alternative would involve concoction and operation of more treatment facilities
at the District's two plants, resulting in greater land-side impacts than the preferred
DCSD Rml 9 .A--C C-7 F IM06
project. As discussed on page 10-8 of the DEIR, the No Project Alternative would
consume greater amounts of energy and emit more air pollutants than the Preferred
Alternative. larger quantities of biosolids would be produced under the No Project
Alternative requiring more land acreage for biosolids recycling. In addition, the No
Project Alternative would result in the same three land-side significant unavoidable
impacts (summarized in Section V, above) as the preferred project. Under the No
Project Alternative, treatment Scenario 5 or 6 would be implemented. Table ES-I1 in the
Executive Summary provides a comparison between treatment scenarios. The No Project
Alternative generally results in greater land-side impacts than Scenarios 1 and 2 and less
than Scenarios 3 and 4. The No Project Alternative would provide higher quality effluent
to the ocean discharge. However, the Preferred Alternative would not create a
significant impact to the marine environment that would be reduced or eliminated by the
No Project Alternative. The Preferred Alternative would provide adequate treatment to
comply with the existing NPDES permit.
2. The No Project Alternative would not reduce the current potential need for emergency
discharge to the 78-inch diameter outfall. This near-shore discharge is identified as a
significant unavoidable impact due to the potential for beach closures (DEIR Table S-2,
Impact 5-9). Under the No Project Alternative, the significant unavoidable impact would
remain until a new 120-inch diameter outfall were constructed.
3. The No Project Alternative would require the installation of the new 120-inch diameter
outfall to avoid frequent emergency discharges to the 78-inch diameter outfall under peak
wet weather conditions. Installation of this parallel outfall could adversely impact the
marine environment during construction. Although the Preferred Alternative allows for
the possibility that the 120-inch diameter outfall may be needed in the distant future and
acknowledges that these impacts could occur (DEIR page 3-38 and 9-10), additional
methods of reducing peak wet weather discharges are provided. As described on page S-
16 of the DEIR, methods to reduce the need for excess discharge to the 78-inch diameter
outfall would include flow reduction via water conservation, inflow and infiltration
reduction, in-plant equalization storage, the GWR System, and stormwater detention
storage on site. These measures are not explicitly outlined or planned under the No
Project Alternative.
4. Impacts from the upgrade and rehabilitation of the collection system under the No Project
Alternative would be similar to the Preferred Alternative. However, the additional
projects identified under the Preferred Alternative would reduce the risk of overflows or
leaks within the collection system. The Preferred Alternative would therefore have fewer
potential impacts to public health and safety than the No Project Alternative(DEIR page
9-6).
5. Implementation of the GWR-System would be as likely to occur under the No Project
Alternative as under the Preferred Alternative. Therefore, the water reuse project would
not be a factor in distinguishing the Preferred Alternative from the No Project
Alternative. Either treatment Scenario 5 (no GWR)or 6 (with GWR) is considered to be
the No Project Alternative as described in the DEIR on page 3-9.
OCSD nm 9 X.Au,dmm C C-8 FSA/%0n6
6. Under the No Project Alternative, a new 120-inch diameter outfall would be constructed
to accommodate project peak wet weather flows. The construction of the new outfall
would be the most costly alternative (DEIR page 3-41). The Preferred Alternative would
reduce the need for the new outfall through the implementation of wet weather
management methods described on page S-16 of the DEIR.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES STUDIED
FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT
The 1999 Strategic Plan analyzes the alternative of providing full secondary treatment for all
wastewater flow(Scenarios 3 and 4). The alternative would require additional treatment facilities
within the foot-print of the existing treatment plants and use more energy, increase air emissions,
and create greater quantities of residual solids for reuse or disposal. The alternative would
provide greater treatment than currently required under the 1998 NPDES permit. However,the
District's 301(h) waiver NPDES permit requires that full secondary treatment be analyzed.
Findings
This alternative was rejected since it would not avoid significant impacts of the project:
1. Full secondary treatment would not avoid the significant unavoidable impacts associated
with the Preferred Alternative including beach closure during discharges to the near-shore
78-inch diameter outfall. Table S-1 of the DEIR provides a comparison of the treatment
alternatives. Although full secondary treatment provides for higher quality effluent to the
ocean discharge, marine monitoring results suggest that impacts to the marine
environment would not be significant under treatment Scenario 2. In addition, treatment
Scenario 2 would maintain full compliance with the District's NPDES permit.
2. Full secondary treatment would require the construction of the greatest number of new
treatment facilities of all alternatives analyzed. The additional treatment facilities would
create greater operational impacts to energy resources, air quality, and biosolids reuse
and disposal facilities as discussed in Chapter 10 of the DEIR.
3. Construction impacts from treatment facility construction would be greater under this
alternative. As indicated in Tables 3-2 and 3-3,the Preferred Alternative (Scenario 2)
would require the least amount of new treatment facilities. Impacts associated with Full
Secondary Scenarios 3 and 4 would include greater air emissions from energy
consumption and mobile sources, greater energy requirements, potentially new air
emissions permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),
need for greater amount of land for biosolids recycling applications, and greater
construction impacts including air emissions, noise, and traffic impacts to surrounding
neighborhoods (DEIR Chapter 10).
4. The costs associated with the construction and operation of full secondary treatment
facilities are significantly greater than with other treatment alternatives. Treatment
Scenario 2, the Preferred Alternative, would be the least costly alternative.
=D Rmr Wax,Aer —C C-9 BA I9 16
PEAK WET WEATHER MANAGEMENT
As discussed on page 5-16 of the DEIR, several strategies were considered to reduce projected
peak wet weather flows to the ocean outfall:
• Flow reduction via water conservation of up to 13 mgd by 2020.
• Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) flow reduction of extraneous water entering the collection
system by up to 20% (about 80 mgd)by 2020.
• Utilize and maximize existing in-plant storage(7 mg).
• Participate in GWR System - Phase 1 (100 mgd peak wet weather flow diversion for
reuse).
• Add stormwater detention storage at the treatment plants.
• Use the 78-inch outfall for infrequent wet weather discharges, only when the capacity
provided by all of the above measures is exceeded.
In addition to these projects,the District considered several storage and discharge options to
increase discharge capacity to accommodate peak wet weather including:
• Construction of a new 120-inch deepwater outfall
• Construction of a parallel barrel for the existing 120-inch outfall that ties into the diffuser
• Discharge to the Santa Ana River
• Increased storage at the treatment plants (beyond 7 MG)
As discussed in EIR Chapter 9,Alternatives,only construction of the a new 120-inch decpwater
outfall is a feasible alternative for peak wet weather flow management. This option would
eliminate the need for use of the 78-inch outfall and avoid the need for beach closure. As with
the existing 120-inch outfall,effluent discharge from the deepwater location would not affect the
near-shore environment and necessitate beach closure. Implementation of the GWR System will
significantly delay the need for a new deepwater outfall. The remaining options were eliminated
due to questions of feasibility.
CONSTRUCT A NEW I20-/NCH OUTFALL
The 1999 Strategic Plan analyzes the installation of an additional 120-inch diameter outfall
extending four to five miles from shore, parallel to the existing outfall. The outfall would provide
adequate discharge capacity to meet projected peak wet weather flow volumes well past the year
2020. In addition,the outfall would eliminate the significant unavoidable impacts created by
peak wet weather discharges to the near-shore through the 78-inch diameter outfall. Due to the
elimination of these significant impacts including the need for beach closure,the installation of
the new 120-inch diameter outfall was considered to be the environmentally superior peak wet
weather discharge alternative(DEIR page 5-16). The construction of a new 120-inch cutfall is
the only option studied by the District that would eliminate the significant and unavoidable
impact(as denoted in the DEIR Summary Table S-2)of beach closure during a peak wet weather
event. Even full secondary treatment would not eliminate this impact due to the need to
WSD Rao 9 X,A--B-.0 C-10 MA/9%R6
discharge periodically to the near-shore just as with the other treatment scenarios. However, the
new outfall option was not included within the Preferred Alternative for reasons discussed below.
Findings
This alternative was rejected since it would not meet the third project objective of proposing
"projects that meet the community's needs...and are cost effective and environmentally
responsible." The following issues highlight this deficiency:
1. Installation of a new parallel 120-inch diameter ourfall could adversely impact the marine
environment during construction. Additional impact analysis would be required prior to
implementation. Although the Preferred Alternative allows for the possibility that the
120-inch diameter outfall may be needed in the distant future and acknowledges that
impacts could occur(DEIR page 3-38 and 9-10), additional methods of reducing wet
weather discharges are provided. As described on page 5-16 of the DEIR, methods to
reduce the need for excess discharge to the 78-inch diameter outfall would include flow
reduction via water conservation, inflow and infiltration reduction, in-plant equalization
storage, the GWR System, and stormwater detention storage on site.
2. The additional discharge capacity provided by a new outfall at this time would far exceed
average daily needs. With a new outfall, the District would have discharge capacity well
beyond projected needs in year 2020. The excess of discharge capacity would be a
growth inducing element of the system, that would not be sized in accordance with
planned land use and projected demand. For peak wet weather management purposes, a
new outfall would only be needed an estimated once every three years. The DEIR
acknowledges that the 120-inch outfall may be necessary, particularly if the GWR System
is not implemented. However, the Preferred Alternative implements actions including the
GWR System to avoid creating significant new discharge capacity solely for peak wet
weather needs.
3. The concoction of the new outfall would be the most costly alternative (estimated at
$150-200 million)and one of the most expensive hydraulic wet-weather relief options
considered. A new deep water outfall would constitute a significant capital expense for a
facility needed for infrequent peak wet weather discharges. The additional dry weather
capacity would far exceed anticipated need. The Preferred Alternative reduces the need
for the new outfall through the implementation of wet weather management methods
described on page 5-16 of the DEIR. At this time, economics render this alternative
economically infeasible.
CONSTRUCT ON-SITE STORAGE
As a means to accommodate peak wet weather flows without increasing discharge capacity,the
1999 Strategic Plan analyzed the installation of peak wet weather storage tanks within the plant
sites. These storage tanks would be able to provide temporary storage of untreated wastewater
until the treatment plants and discharge facilities were able to accommodate the additional flow.
eCM a..ewm W()X.Amlmmt C C-11 MA 19 36
Findings
This option was rejected because it coated additional significant environmental impacts or is
infeasible for the following reasons:
1. The necessary size of the tanks would create significant visual impacts to the surrounding
areas. As discussed on page 9-12 of the DEIR, on-site equalization storage could also
create odor, aesthetics, and public safety impacts on local neighborhoods. The Preferred
Alternative would avoid these impacts.
2. Underground tanks would be infeasible due to the shallow groundwater levels. As
discussed on page 9-12 of the DEIR, due to engineering restraints, the tanks would not
have enough storage capacity to be effective. This option was eliminated from
consideration as a result.
CONSTRUCT A I5,000-FOOT BARREL PARALLEL TO EXISTING OUTFALL
As a means of providing additional peak wet weather disposal capacity,the 1999 Strategic Plan
considered the installation of a 15,000-foot barrel running ring on the ocean floor, parallel to the
existing 120-inch outfall. The barrel would act as a post-treatment storage chamber during
periods of increased flow,providing approximately 150 million gallons per day(mgd)additional
discharge capacity. Total discharge capacity would be 633 mgd with this option.
Findings
This alternative was rejected since it would not meet project objectives:
1. As discussed on page 9-12 of the DEIR, the increased discharge capacity of 150 mgd
combined with the existing 480 mgd would not meet the projected 775 mgd peak wet
weather flow by the year 2020. As a result,this option was eliminated from
consideration.
2. In addition, costs and construction impacts would be significant considering that
subsequent peak wet weather relief facilities would be necessary in addition to the
15,000-foot barrel. The Preferred Alternative would avoid these impacts.
USE THE SANTA ANA RIVER FOR PEAK WET WEATHER DISCHARGE
As a means of providing peak wet weather disposal capacity,the 1999 Strategic Plan considered
using the Santa Ana River weirs to dispose treated wastewater during peak flow events into the
River at Treatment Plant No. 2.
Findings
This alternative was rejected since it would not meet project objectives:
DCM Rml t .AOA$mmtC C-12 6A 1W 36
1. The perceived impacts to water quality and beneficial uses of the Santa Ana River and the
near shore ocean environment removed this option from consideration (DEIR page 9-I1).
2. The NPDES permit identifies this disposal location as an extreme emergency discharge
location only. This option may have required requesting revisions to the permit from the
RWQCB. The Preferred Alternative would avoid these impacts.
COLLECT/ON SYSTEM
Construct Super Sewers in the Collection System
The 1999 Strategic Plan analyzes the possibility of installing extra large sewer segments along
key trunk aligmnents to reduce the need for up-sizing sewers throughout the trunk system. These
"super-sewers"would provide hydraulic relief to certain areas of a trunk system and,in theory,
reduce the need for multiple sewer up-sizing construction areas.
Findings
This alternative was rejected since it would not meet project objectives:
I. After further analysis,the installation of the super-sewers did not appear to provide
enough hydraulic relief to eliminate the need for additional up-sizing up-stream. The
super sewer alternative would not reduce impacts associated with the base-case sewer
upgrades identified as the preferred alternative (DEIR page S-17).
2. The construction impacts associated with the installation of super sewers would be
concentrated in one place for longer periods, unduly impacting certain areas. The
construction impacts would be greater than with the Preferred Alternative (DEIR page S-
17).
Construct Up-Stream Equalization Storage in the Collection System
As a means to accommodate peak wet weather flows without increasing discharge capacity,the
1999 Strategic Plan analyzed the installation of peak wet weather storage facilities upstream of
the treatment plants. These storage tanks would be able to provide temporary storage of untreated
wastewater until the treatment plants and discharge facilities were able to accommodate the
additional flow.
Findings
This option was rejected because it would create additional significant impacts for the following
reasons:
1. The installation of up-stream storage tanks would create additional impacts to
neighborhoods, involving visual impacts, odor, and public safety issues. The Preferred
Alternative would eliminate these impacts (DEIR page 9-12).
O Dam w X,Ae ,C C-13 FSA/% 6
2. The costs associated with acquiring the amount of land needed and constructing
adequately safe storage facilities was not justified by the perceived need for additional up-
stream storage. The Preferred Alternative would eliminate these impacts (DEIR page 9-
12).
C:\TE FiWt�s AlWc Itvcs-Avchmcni C.d
OCSD Rm 9 X.A�C C-14 MA 1 9 36
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-20
CERTIFYING FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CERTIFYING THE
FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval of a master
plan, described as the 1999 Strategic Plan, hereinafter referred to as "Strategic Plan";
and,
WHEREAS, District is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Strategic Plan, pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA
Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the Strategic Plan's environmental impacts objectively, the
District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives
associated with the Strategic Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the District has consulted with other public agencies and the general
public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as required by
CEQA; and,
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1999, the District held a duly-noticed public hearing, to
provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the
Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the District has objectively evaluated the comments from public
agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program
EIR, either in full or in summary, in response to significant environmental concerns
raised in the review and consultation process, have been included in the Final Program
EIR; and,
WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR, the
Technical Appendix, and the Response to Comments have been presented to the
members of the District Board of Directors for review and consideration prior to the final
approval of, and commitment to, the Strategic Plan.
1
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That the Board of Directors hereby certifies that the Final Program EIR on the
1999 Strategic Plan has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEOA
Guidelines, and District's CEOA procedures, and that the Board of Directors has
reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Program EIR prior to
approval of, or commitment to, the Strategic Plan, and that the Final Program EIR,
consisting of the Draft Program EIR, the Technical Appendix, and the Response to
Comments, reflects the District's independent judgment and analysis; and
That the contents of the administrative record are incorporated by reference and
made part of the record supporting these findings and the actions taken by the District in
certifying the Final Program EIR and approving the project:
1. The Final Program EIR and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference
in the Final Program EIR.
2. All testimony, documentary evidence and all correspondence submitted to or
delivered to the District in connection with the meetings, workshops and public
hearings at which the Draft Program EIR or Final Program EIR was considered by
the District.
3. All testimony, documentary evidence, and correspondence of the Rate Advisory
Committee (RAC) and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) in which the Draft
Program EIR or Final Program EIR was considered.
4. All staff reports, memoranda, maps, slides, letters, minutes of meetings and other
documents relied upon or prepared by OCSD staff and consultants relating to the
project.
5. All District files in connection with the Orange County Water District's Groundwater
Replenishment System Environmental Impact Report(November 1998).
6. Any other documents specified by Public Resources Code section 21167.6(e).
The District is the custodian of the administrative record, including all CEOA documents
and the other background documents and materials, which constitute the record of the
proceedings upon which the District Board of Directors' decision to certify the Final
Program EIR and approve the project are based. The administrative record is located at
the OCSD administrative offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California,
92708.
2
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 27, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
MSwp.dIMadminSSXRe oM(onstl 99MOCS09920.doo
3
RESOLUTION NO. OCSO 99-21
ADOPTION OF THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN AND SCENARIO NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING THE 1999 STRATEGIC
PLAN AND SCENARIO NO. 2
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
hereinafter referred to as 'Districr, will adopt a new master plan, described as the
1999 Strategic Plan, hereinafter referred to as "Strategic Plan"; and,
WHEREAS, the "District" will also adopt a new treatment level, described as
Scenario No. 2 of the 1999 Strategic Plan, hereinafter referred to as "Preferred
Alternative"; and,
WHEREAS, District is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Strategic Plan and the Preferred Alternative, pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA" , the State of
California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the Strategic Plan and the Preferred Alternative's
environmental impacts objectively, the District has prepared a Draft Program
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the significant environmental impacts,
mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the Strategic Plan and the
Preferred Alternative; and,
WHEREAS, the District has consulted with other public agencies and the general
public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as required by
CEQA; and,
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1999, the District held a duly-noticed public hearing, to
provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the
Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the District has objectively evaluated the comments from public
agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR for the Strategic Plan and
the Preferred Alternative; and,
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program
EIR, either in full or in summary, in response to significant environmental concerns
raised in the review and consultation process, have been included in the Final Program
EIR for the Strategic Plan; and,
WHEREAS, said Strategic Plan and the Preferred Alternative have been
presented to the members of the Board of Directors of District for review and
consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Strategic Plan and
the Preferred Alternative.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,
1
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts the 1999 Strategic Plan and
Scenario 2 as the "Preferred Alternative" of the 1999 Strategic Plan, and that the
Strategic Plan will replace the 1989 Master Plan with Scenario 2 as the revised
operational plan through year 2020, and that the Board of Directors has reviewed and
considered the information contained in the 1999 Strategic Plan prior to approval of, or
commitment to, Scenario 2, and that the Scenario 2 of the 1999 Strategic Plan reflects
the District's independent judgment and analysis. Scenario 2, referred hereto as the
Preferred Alternative includes:
• Upsize collection system
• Provide level of treatment to meet requirements of 1998 Ocean
Discharge Permit
• Participate in Phase 1 of the GWR System
• Use in-plant storage to mitigate peak flows
• Rely on 78-inch outfall for emergency discharge (once every 3 years
in 2020)
• Pursue water conservation and inflowlnfiltration reduction
The Strategic Plan is a comprehensive 20-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled
"1999 Strategic Plan; hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed engineering
reports, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying the
required future development of District and jointly owned facilities for providing sewer
service to all properties with the District service area;
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting held October 27, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
HAwp.&al ditM8 Res Mo=X199910CSD9&21.d=
2
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 10/27/99 TIME: 7:00 PM
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................
_,� �G —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................
� —
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS....................... ✓ _y,G —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... ✓ �L —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... ✓ _ 7 —
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE.....................
sd� —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �G —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................
_/` ✓ —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................
_� —
(SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON..................... _l` —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... —
(MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... a— a, _
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ �L —
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ �L —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................
�/ —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... a—
(SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... �L ✓ —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ i —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ✓ ✓
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER.......................
..
STAFF: d`.4 ' �
Anderson
Kyleli �i�4a4H
Kyle
Ludwin Awe,-"
McIntyre La'( C�Miles
Ooten
Peterman
Streed
Tuchman
OTHERS
Woodru .ff
Andrus
03/24/99 %wro v X
\YadonWatat\wp.EtaWdmin\BSIOIRECTOR\Dlrmtom Rotl Call.dw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. R�KS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 1011 7 AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: Z Z 10 2
(number/street)
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
H:wp.olawFwn s%FORMwRequest to Speak.°oc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES. /DATE: � �'^'Z1 AGENDA ITEM NO. //-7
NAME: (please print) NN I �Ot
HOME ADDRESS: dl'5wy el—
(number/street)
(city/zip co (e)
TELEPHONE: �9 72 -�`St7
REPRESENTING: O� ('.�zr/n V
(self/name of organization) 7—
H:\wp.Ma\admin)RSFORMSVtequ to Speak.doc
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
/1) a 4 I,?9 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
e oJE
2 2ownJ (�C 957 �
S
eS
H:=P.DTAI DMINWTORMMIGN-IN FORM.DDG
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
October 27, 1999—7:00 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is
appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
3. a. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re
appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows:
City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director
Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson' Mark Schwing
b. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to
preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
HAwp.dla%agendaSoard Agenc!W1999 Board Agenc!W102799supplemental.doo
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on 19ZZ was duly posted
posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this c�/ day of
Penny M. K , Secrets
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HAW P.DTA\ADMIMBS\F0R MS\F27A
9
D
cam
October 19, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Doug Cook -De
Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Earthquake of October 16, 1999
On October 16, 1999 at 2:46 AM, the two Orange County Sanitation District's
Treatment Plants and associated Pump Stations experienced an earthquake centered
in the Mojave Desert with a 7.1 magnitude. Due to the distance from the earthquake's
epicenter, the effects on the two plants and pump stations were limited in nature. For
this reason, the ICS (Incident Command System) was not established, however some
standby personnel were called in to support existing scheduled operations staff.
The earthquake's effects at Plant No. 1 were primarily from Edison voltage disruptions,
causing #1 MSP (Main Sewer Pump) to shut off(re-started). At Plant No. 2, damage
was limited to the failure of a digester hi-rate mixing pump (taken out of service by
staff). In the Collections System, one pump shut down at Lido Pump Station (re-
started). Overall, staff at both plants reacted very professionally to the event, doing so
safely and carefully, ensuring that there were no process or service problems.
DC:II
CATEMPVloenl Memo October 16.doc
C: File
OCSD a P.O.Box 8127 a Fountain Valley,CA 92726-8127 0(714)962d411
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
October 21, 1999
vv.•s:
alai 962-2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
In.111, dd...:
P.O.Box 8127 Subject: Board Letter
Founteln valley.CA
M72B-B127
""Ltl°na, The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
low a;;e id.nae Y Y 9
Fa.dan ve;ky.(I information on any of the items, please call me.
a270B-701B
Biosolids Regulation Attacked in National Press
err Articles published in the October 7, 1999 edition of USA Today and the
Alsatian September 27, 1999 edition of TIME magazine have questioned the adequacy of the
e Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) biosolids regulation. Specifically, the
cities articles claim that EPA's rule is not protective of human health in that it allows for the
excessive discharge of toxic metals, pathogens, and organic chemicals. It appears
area that that Dr. David Lewis, an EPA 'WhistlebloweP scientist, spawned these articles. Dr.
Bvana Perk Lewis recently presented anti-biosolids testimony in Kem County and gave the official
C)Pre s Kern County staff report regarding the County's biosolids ordinance.
F..h.,h Valley
Fuearmn
Gardah G.. In response to these articles, USA Today published rebuttals by EPA on October 7,
Han[ingmn Beach 1999 and the Water Environment Federation WEF on October 13, 1999. EPA and
( )
Le Habra WEF stress the adequacy of the federal regulations for the protection of human
L.Palma health. EPA and WEF stated that the recent review of the federal biosolids regulation
Loa Alemimh b National Academy of Science verifies the safe of biosolids reuse.
Newport Beach Y Y safety
@enge
Platen. TIME has yet to publish a rebuttal. Copies of both of these anti-biosolids articles and
Sartre Ana
Baal Beach the rebuttals have been attached for your review.
Stchw
iuSPn Ville Park Now It's Imperial County
mroe ones
Do.., ar ar.nr. We have gotten word that the Imperial County Board of Supervisors will consider a
ban on the use of all biosolids at its meeting of October 26. Staff, working with other
California wastewater treatment agencies, intends to resist the ordinance.
eanitary Districts
C"ere Wee Y2K Coordinating Plan Training
Midway cery
vaur Districts Over the past six months, staff has been working with Communications Performance
Group to develop plans and emergency operating procedures for Y2K preparation.
1M1ra Ranch Staff will be trained on the plans in November. The Incident Command System (ICS)
refresher training will take place on November 9, 1999, for personnel who will be on
staff from 6 p.m. (12131199) through 6 a.m. (01101/00). A tabletop Y2K event will be
held on November 10 to test the Y2K Coordinating Plan, various Department/Division
Contingency Plans, and emergency operating procedures.
-7.Protect Me P W c Health and the Erra aht through ExceNenca in Waarasmar Syarems'
Members of the Board
Page 2
October 21, 1999
State Legislation Update
The California Legislature recessed in September, and Governor Davis had 30 days
to veto all enrolled legislation. Below are brief descriptions of some of the legislation
of interest to the District's operations. Detailed information about the proposed Water
Bond was provided to the full Board at the September meeting.
Assembly Bill 538 (Wayne) was passed as a follow-up bill to AB 411, the bill that
resulted in the development of the beach closure standards used during the
Huntington Beach closure and investigation. AS 538 would require the State Water
Resources Control Board, in conjunction with the Department of Health Services, to
develop protocols for use in investigating storm drains that produce exceedances of
bacteriological standards. Based on the District's experiences in dealing with the
Huntington Beach investigation, staff expects to provide information to the State on
developing its investigation procedures. This bill may prove to be very important for
agencies that conduct beach monitoring along coastal California.
Senate Bill 709, originally authored as AS 50 (Migden), requires minimum mandatory
penalties of$3,000 for effluent violations by POTWs and other NPOES dischargers.
Although the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and other
associations worked to get appropriate amendments to this bill, it was pushed through
as a budget trailer bill before the much needed amendments could be introduced into
the legislation. At the time that the Governor signed the legislation, he expressed a
desire to have follow-up legislation drafted to improve the bill, but the author
continues to resist any changes to the legislation. There is concern among POTWs
that this legislation could result in substantial penalties for some municipalities.
CASA and the League of California Cities are hosting a workshop on the legislation
on November 1, 1999 in Ontario to discuss its implementation and impact.
Legislative Hearings on AB411
The Assembly Committee on Natural Resources held an interim hearing on October 6
in San Diego to examine the results of the statewide beach water quality monitoring
established by AB411. By the end of the hearing it was clear from the testimony of
public health officials, environmental groups, and regulators, that the program to test
coastal waters and notify the public of the results has been effective. There was
general agreement that the implementing regulations adopted by the State
Department of Health Services need to be fine-tuned to provide guidance to local
health officials for making decisions about when to reopen a beach once it has been
closed or posted. Assemblyman Scott Baugh held a public forum on this same topic
on October 7 in Huntington Beach. Blake Anderson and Bob Ghirelli presented an
overview of the source investigation at Huntington Beach this summer and answered
questions from the audience. The sense of this meeting was that the science behind
the bill is sound and that better criteria are needed to clarify what it takes to get a
beach reopened.
Members of the Board
Page 3
October 21, 1999
News on Those Pesky Guys Wanting Our$49 Million
On October 7, Judge Gary Taylor heard arguments from those that want our money
and from those that don't want to give it up. The firm of Hannigan, Mercer and
Bennett has suggested at the eleventh hour that Orange County and the participants
in the Orange County Investment Pool should agree to a fee enhancement of$49
million. While we would all agree that the firm has done a remarkable job of
recovering a large portion of our collective loss from those Wall Street firms that
participated in the decisions that led to the bankruptcy, we disagree that the firm
deserves more than the already very generous hourly fees they were paid along the
way. Judge Taylor heard extensive arguments in a three-hour session in front of his
bench. Patrick Shea, the attorney for the Orange County Investment Pool Committee
has outlined the highlights of the session in the letter, which is attached.
Correspondence Received on Behalf of Staff
Our Collections staff continues to help other agencies as evidenced by the attached
September 13 letter from the City of Garden Grove.
We also received a copy of a letter from Midway City Sanitary District commending
General Counsel's staff on their regular litigation report
Water Bond Package
Included in the attachments is a September 23 letter from P. Joseph Grindstaff,
General Manager of SAWPA, thanking all whom assisted in getting the Water Bond
issue approved by the Governor and on the March 2000 ballot. This bond, if
approved by the voters, will provide funding for many important projects in the Santa
Ana River Watershed that will help improve the quality of the groundwater and the
discharges to the Santa Ana River. Staff will be working with SAWPA to reach
agreement on funding issues.
Municipal Treasurers' Association Award
The Municipal Treasurers'Association has recognized the District for having its
written investment policy certified. The Association's Investment Policy Certification
Program was instituted in an effort to assist state and local governments interested in
drafting or improving upon an existing investment policy. A written investment policy
is only certified when the Association's Investment Policy Review Team
acknowledges that the policy has met all criteria set forth in the Program. This is the
second award for the District.
National Award from 3CMA
We are pleased to announce that the District received a second place award for our
participation at the Orange County Fair in nationwide competition sponsored by the
City-County Communications and Marketing Association (3CMA). The award was
Members of the Board
Page 4
October 21, 1999
presented in the category of Most Effective Public Outreach Program for Least Dollars
Spent. With entries received from hundreds of cities and public agencies throughout
the country, competition is always stiff. Judges cited our use of humor and innovative
approach to educating the public about our wastewater collection, treatment and
disposal services. 3CMA is associated with the International City Managers
Association.
Odor Complaints
With the recent hot weather, we continue to receive odor complaints. O&M staff
responded to five calls in the past months. Several of these were outside the
treatment plants and the Collections staff installed gas flaps on manholes in an
attempt to stem odors.
Published Articles of Interest
I want to remind you that a reading notebook is available for your review that contains
articles published in the past month pertaining to issues of importance to the District.
This is maintained by the Communications Department and if you would like copies of
articles or have articles that you would like included in the notebook, please call
Michelle Tuchman at 714 593.7120.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
1"614�11 �
Don McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
M MP mA4NWMGMOFMLLE RS Tot MMPYV.\pPSS.COC
Attachments
v
Copyright 1999 Gannett Company. Inc.
USA TODAY
October 7. 1999.Thursdui. FINAL EDITION
SECTION:NEWS:
Pg. 18A
LENGTH: $27 words
HEADLINE:Faced with evidence of health treat,EPA looks the other wac
BODY:
Early in the morning of Nov. 24. 1995.Joanne Marshall woke to find her 26-yearold son.Shavne Conner.gasping
for breath.Though an ambulance rushed hum to die hospital.hie later died from respiratory distress.
Comer's death wasjust one of several medical problems that neighbors in Greenland.N.H..had experienced in the
month after cocks started dumping seiiage sludge—residue heft over from wastewater treatment plants—on a nearby
field.
Did sludge contribute to Conner's death?Did it cause the death of l l-year-old Tony Behun?He died in 1994 shortly
after riding his motorcycle through a Pennsylvania field rectal coated with sewage sludge. And has it killed famh
ua annls,as some fanners allege?So far.no clear link has been established between the deaths and sludge.There are
only troubling questions about the possible health effects of exposure to sewage sludge.
At the very least,however.these deaths call for an aggressive investigation. Instead.lite Environmental Protection
Agency has been circling the wagons.It was an EPA rule in 1993 that allowed about 2 million metric tons of sludge to
be used throughout the country as a cheap.often free,fertilizer. And since then,the agency has fallen into the disturbing
but familiar pattern it follows when its rules ton into trouble: It bmshes off complaints,downplays uncertainties in the
science and attacks critics.
When asked about Shame Comer's death,for instance.the EPA brandishes a letter written by the town's medical
curnmerjust days after Comher's death.The letter.released by the agency, says the death"ins not the result of the use
of such fertilizer."
But that preliminary conclusion is hardly definitive. As the letter states.the examiner's finding was based in pan on
the assumption,denied by the family,that others"were completely unaffected"by the sludge And it was.the examiner
noted,based on assurances that sludge was"safe to use."
The final autopsy report issued several months haler and obtained by USA TODAY left the cause of death an open
question,and the firmly has since sued the sludge company.
The EPA hasn't handled the science question any better.
Under EPA n lies,sludge—a noxious brew containing pollutants and pathogens—can be recycled as fertilizer if it's
cleaned to specified levels and used under certain restrictions.The EPA insists dal lite science behind these rates
guarantees safety.
However,the EPA's own scientists raised doubts about the science as die rule was drafted.according to memos
obtained by USA TODAY.The EPA adhnited to some of these weaknesses in 1993 by calling for extensive follow-up
research.
9
Meanwhile,other studies have raised red nags. A 1999 study by Cornell University's Wasic Management Institute.
for instance,concluded that EPA sludge odes"do not appear adequately protective of hutmn heallh."It found that
many European countries lave far tougher sludge standards Ilan the U.S.
As a exult.critics contend the rules are too loose and that toxic metals,pathogens and organic dtunic is can escape,
Ming a potential hazard to nearby people and annals. Several local governments lave banned or restricted sludge on
farms. Yet when critics raise their voices. the EPA has attacked.Examples:
•When EPA scientist David Lewis saved complaining about the safety of the sludge mles a few rears ago.EPA
officials tried to discredit his research.according to Lewis.who has filed a whisileblower complaint against the agency.
• When California community activist Jane Beswick started sounding alarm bells. Alan Rubin.an official in the
EPA's Office of Water,fired off an ominous letter utning Besvick that her efforts to ban sludge use could prompt
regulators to look closely m fanners'use of manure and fertilizers.
And when act attacking critics.One agency has been busv promoting sludge use. Over the past three rears, for
example,it has spent almost$70.000 on grants to the Water Enviromnem Federation for a sludge"public acceptance
campaigr,"according to the Federal Assistance Award Data System.
This is not One fern Ome One EPA has been accused of shoddy science or attacks on critics. It recently had to reverse
course on a gas additive. And last June,senml EPA officials complained of One hostile treatment whistlebhmvers
receive inside llte agency.
Now members of the House and Senate are pressing EPA chief Carol Browner to explain the apparent manhandling
of sludge critics inside and outside the agency.
But first We EPA should explain why it has failed to live up to its 1993 pledge"to more aggressively to address any
problems uidi sewage-sludge use should the evidence warrant."
In the end,sludge may prove perfectly safe.But by its behavior so tar.the EPA has given the public little reason to
feel confident.
GRAPHIC: GRAPHIC.B/W.Suzy Parker.USA TODAY,Source: Comell Waste Management Institute(Bar graph.
Illustration)
r
Copyright 1999 Time Inc.
Time
September 27. 1999
SECTION:NOTEBOOK;Pg, 26
LENGTH:262 words
HEADLINE:Environment;
Fight over Sludge Stars to Get Dim
BYLINE: Arnold Mann/Wasldngton
BODY:
Environmental Protection Agency chief CAROL BROWNER is in for an angry letter from some Congressmen this
week. At issue: "serious, perhaps even illegal"behavior on the part of EPA senior scientist ALAN RUBIN.author of -
the 503 Sludge Rule,which declared municipal wastes safe for spreading in forests and farmlands.
What Representative JOE KNOLLENBERG(R.,Mich.),House science committee chair JAMES
SENSENBRENNER(k,Wis.),Senator JAMES INHOFE(R.,Okla.)and others want to know is,Has Rubin been
engaging in"threatening and harassing"telephone oils and a-mails to the residences of and-sludge activists Helaine
Shields,Jane Beswick and others?Did Rubin attempt to bribe a waste-treatment-company executive to get him to
"refrain from raising concerns"about sludge transportation and mop insisting it be mansponed as hazardous waste?Has
Rubin been distributing"selected,preliminary"risk data that appeared to discredit sludge-toxicity findings by EPA
scientist David Lewis?The agency has come under fire for Ionizing its scientists who question regulations. Now the
intimidation may have spread. "I mum be on to something,or he wouldn't be coming at me like this."says California
dairy farmer and anti-sludger Beswick,who got eight letters from Rubin,one accompanied by a note: "Jane:Ask not for
whom the bell tolls;it tolls for thee!"
Rubin,contacted by TIME,denied all charges.He says he regularly sends communications to those who oppose EPA
policy, not to harass or threaten but to inform.
—By Arnold Mann/Washington
GRAPHIC: COLOR PHOTO:PAUL EFLAND—U OF GEORGIA,Lewis,with sludge
r
Copyright 1999 Gmucm Company. Inc.
USA TODAY
October 7. 1999.Thursday. FINAL EDITION
SECTION:NEWS:
Pg. 1SA
LENGTH:403 words
HEADLINE:EPA sludge standards are tough
BYLINE:Chuck Fox
BODY:
Thirty years ago.thousands of American cities dumped Weir raw sewage directly into our nation's rivers,lakes and
bays. What has happened since then is an American success story.
As a nation. we have cleaned up our waterways and made them safer for recreation and seafood harvest. Countess
American waterways--as well as the economies of the neighboring cities--have experienced a renaissance.
The Great Lakes support much more boating and fishing. In Boston
Harbor,beaches have reopened.The Chesapeake Bay is vastly cleaner mid healthier. _
Each year,76%of American farnilies plan Weir vacations near We water.
When sewage is removed from water.those wastes become sludge.The Envimnmental Protection Agency works
with local governments to ensure that sludge is safely managed.Local governments make the decision whether to
recycle the sludge as a fertilizer,incinerate it or bury it in a landfill.
Only sewage sludge that meets the strongest safery tests can be approved for use as fen0izer.and it is used on less
than 1%u of the nation's agricultural land.
The EPA sets tough health standards for all disposal options.and backs them up with strong enforcement actions that
hold treatment plants accountable.
The National Academy of Sciences has reviewed current practices,public health concerns and regulatory standards,
and has concluded that"the use of these materials in the production of crops for human consumption,when practiced in
accordance with existing federal guidetnes and regulations,presents negligible risk to the consumer,to crop production
and to the enviromnem."
Additionally,the EPA continually seeks out new,credible science that might lead in to improved standards.
Although cities decide how best to manage their sludge,the EPA is obligated to provide[lie public with educational
informatory based on the best science.about the safe recycling and disposal of sludge.
Additionally, the EPA is constantly vigilant about emsuring the quality of sludge-control programs.
We constantly investigate all concerns raised about our own program and We programs in local communities.
Our goals are simple:to clean up America's rivers,lakes and bays,and to ensue that sludge is managed in
scientifically proven methods that provide for the full protection of public health and the environment
,
a
Copyright 1999 Game((Company. Inc.
USA TODAY
October 13. 1999, Wednesday, FINAL EDITION
SECTION:NEWS;
Pg. 16A
LENGTH: 368 words
HEADLINE: Well-managed biosolids should not be a health threat
BODY:
The Water Environment Federation(WEF)is concerned about an Oct.7 editorial suggesting that recycling the solid
byproducts of the wastewater treatment process may pose a"health treat"("Faced with evidence of health threat,EPA
looks the other way,"Our View,Environmental safety debate).
WEF believes that the land application of these solids,as prescribed by extensive Environmental Protection Agency
regulations,is currently the best scientifcally-supported alternative for managing them.
WEF has a 70-year tradition of protecting die environment and public health by providing scientifically-supported
technical information to those who safeguard the nation's water resources.The 40.000 water-quality professionals who
are WEF members work to ensure tat:
—Wastewater returned to our nation's waterways is clean:
-•And solids removed and treated during the cleansing process are managed in a safe and environmentally sound
manner.
EPA regulations governing biosolids are widely recognized as the product of landmark, scientific rule making,
backed by 40 years of research and analysis demonstrating the safely of proper biosolids recycling.The process
included an exhaustive review of data by nationally respected scientists independent of the EPA--as well as extensive
public involvement.
In addition to the EPA the Department of Agriculture.We Food and Drug Administration and the National Research
Council have endorsed biosolids recycling in accordance with EPA regulations as safe for use in the production of food
crops.These documented findings refute unsupported allegations and innuendo that have been the subject of media
speculation.
WEF knows of no scientific research or event that demonstrates or suggests any detrimental effects of properly
managed biosolids on human health or the environment.
WEF would be eager to review any such information.Meanwhile,recycling has proved to be the most socially and
environmentally responsible solution for managing these byproducts of producing cleaner water.
Albert C. Gray,Ph.D.
Deputy executive director
Tedmical programs
Water Environment Federation
♦ Oct-11-11 0146aa Frm-PILLSBURY $0 ♦ T-553 P.02 F-010
( ATtOQa ATIAW
101 W.a aMag.y.=I=
SlJlaafin[.LL4TYINIw 91101J419
il1DHpNE(919)rT1.�m FNC(619)➢b1991
M.diwn&
Sutra LLP
W1 SIR�0m1eR(fmsL
(60)Sym
:m_Pcnuwmv".
October 15, 1999
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS'DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In Re Country of Orange-Hennigan,Mercer&Benuett Boons Request
Dear Pool Participant:
On October 7, 1999.the undersigned appeared before United Sums District Court Judge
Gary Taylor on behalf of the Pool Participans to oppose Hennigan Mercer and Beret's
("HMB")motion for a S49 million enhancrmeot of the$26 million in fees it has already received
respecting their representation of our Litigation Representative,Tom Hayes. Representative
Hayes also opposed the motion,represented by attorney,Gerald McMahon of Seltzer Caplan
Wilkins&McMahon,as did the County of Orange,represented by Ass(srant County Counsel
Tom Egan.
Judge Taylor was well prepared and had given susranrW Thought To the many issues
presented in The motion. He posed dozens,of questions to both sides before hearing oral
argument from counsel. Broadly categorized,the questions included: (1)procedural aspects of
the case(i.e.were all interested parties before the court,would the parries agree that the district
court had jurisdiction over the matter,was a jury trial required to resolve the fee dispute);(2)the
legal issues presented(i.e.how the bee agreement entered into between Tom Hayes and HMB
should be mtexprowd,whether payment of The bonus conflicted with provisions of the California
Constitution,the legal effect of HMB soliciting Tom Hayes and Pool Participants to modify the
fee agteereem to provide for a partial contingency fee is 1997 and 1998);and(3)factual
questons at issue(tbe exact terms of the proposed modifications of the fee agreement,whether
Pool Pamcipanrs and the County had been informed of the terms of the fee aagrecmc+ter and what
the County and Pool Participants assessment was of HMB's performance).
The hearing consumed over tbree bows. There were several issues of note. Judge Taylor
appeared interested in discerning the munnoas and understanding of HMB and Mr.Hayes when
entering ima the fee agreement m July of 1996. Pool Parncipams,the parry ultimately paying
HMB's fees and which bore The risk of litigating these matters by fronting the$50 million
Sn MX30 IAtu)Ct16 a Tom swr¢M®m sr` ID V IEY Wwp0101 W TSZYO
50019352W
Oct-15-35 0 5:2 Tom From-PILLSBURY SO ♦ T-553 P.03 F-010
Orange County Investment Pool
Participants'Distribution List .. ._.... .... . ,,.... „._. . �.... .. ,-_.. .... . _ __-
October 15, 1999 °
Page 2
litigation fund,argued that HMB was understood to be retained on an hourly fee basis. Also,to
the extent the contract language in the fee agreement could be read otherwise,such other
compensation was discretionary to the Representative and he had refused w approval any
requested bonus.
Judge Taylor also questioned whether the fee agreement preserved Tom Hayes'
discretion to approve litigation spending as provided under the Plan. I argued that the Plan,
drafted by HMB,provided Mr.Hayes with discretion with respect to all aspects of the litigation
cases,subject to review by a judge on an-abuse of discretion"basis. The disputed 1996 fee
agreement acknowledges That it was entered into pursuant to the Plan,and therefore mast be read
in harmony with the Pian's-provisions.-Further,the earlier conduct by HMB cons ri ing the.fee-
agreement toto request a discretionary request of Hayes for any changes in hourly fees
demonstrated that HMB understood Mr.Hayes' approval was necessary to adjust their fee,both
regarding hourly billing rates and also when they sought his approval to modify the fee
agreemem to provide for a partial wrtingency fee.
There was also an issue as to whether under the case law cited in the briefs,the court
could disregard W.Hayes' denial of The bonus and instead award HMB a-reasonable fee,"
which could include a bonus amount. I argued that the Plan contemplated that all decisions
regarding the litigation spending were to be decided by Mr.Hayes,subject to corm review only
on an abuse of discretion basis. Therefore,it was the court's responsibility only to determine
whether Mr.Hayes abused his discretion in denying HMB's requested S49 million bonus
Neither the Plan am the fee agreement contemplated that the court or any other third party(such
as retired Judge John Davies who provided a supporting dechnomon to HMS's fee motion)could
set a"reasonable fee"ar the end of HMS's services Whether Mr.Hayes had exercised his
reasonable judge me nt in good faith in denying the fee eriluooce memt was the only issue left
unresolved
At the conclusion of the hearing,Judge Taylor indicated he would issue a written opinion
with his ruling,bin did not say when it could be announced. I will advise you of the court's
decision
Thank you for your continued support of the Committee-
Sincerely,
Patrick C.Shea
w: Orange County Official Investment Pool
Participants Coammice and Counsel
W.Thomas W.Hayes
somvrsah
0
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Ert
13803 NEWHOPE STREET, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92843
:LZ 776L-Ae oPA ! WW
GARDEN GROVE UI'N D J , PECctLkIa —�
PFM l v1.wL�� aw : lN
� Zbf'0aN �o�r e•-Aao
September 13, 1999
/ aw E S dfF t�A kS r5 A�i, wdt lPAD
Mc Nick ArhonEe� 4J
Manager- Collection Facilities Operations and Maintenance
Orange County Sanitation District q�Lot'Y4
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-7018
Dear Mr. Arhontes:
The City of Garden Grove Utilities Division would like to thank you for all of the
assistance offered by your agency earlier this month. On September 4, 1999,
your employees assisted with the severe blockage located at Knott Street and
Belgrave Avenue in Garden Grove. The next day, OCSD crews responded to an
overflow on Brookhurst Street on our behalf. On September 7, Walt Williams and
crew continued to offer their assistance in resolving the blockage at Knott Street
and Belgrave Avenue.
We were impressed and greatly assisted by the field expertise and equipment
availed by your agency. We look forward to continue working together in the
future.
Sincerely,
"4,i'I'L
Terry E. Lane
Utilities Services Manager
Board or Directors
Grace P. Epperson
r James V. Evans
Joy L. Neugebauer
Russell C. Paris
Margie L. Rice
September 13, 1999
General Manager
Del Boyer
Woodruff, Spradlin& Smart
701 So. Parker, Suite 7000
Orange, CA 92866-4720
Gentlemen:
We wish to commend Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart for the litigation report
recently provided to the Orange County Sanitation District. District
representative, Joy L. Neugebauer, informed our Board of the exemplary report at
our September 7" meeting and complimented both the completeness and format of
the report.
The Board of Directors of the Midway City Sanitary District sincerely appreciates
the professional services provided to this organization by the Law Office of
Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart. As always, it is a pleasure to be associated with
your firm.
James. V. Evans Joy L. Neugebauer
President Secretary
\pt: Don McIntyre, General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
14451 Cedarvrood Avenue • Westminster,California 92683 • (714) 893-3553 • Fax(714) 8.91.8624
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
I COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY
CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
SAWPA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER
P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF
September 23, 1999
Don McIntyre
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127
Dear Don:
On behalf of everyone involved with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority,I
would like to thank you for your time and energy in helping to secure our project's
funding in the water bond package.
As you are aware,the bond includes $250 million for increasing regional water
storage, developing new supplies, improving local water quality and improving the
Santa Ana basin's wildlife habitat. These projects,when fully funded, will create
1.3 million acre-feet of new water storage and 300,000 acre-feet of annual yield,
making the region completely self-sufficient during times of drought. The bond's
flood control provisions will protect watershed residents from the perils of Santa
Ana river flooding.
Without the strong regional support furnished by you,our friends in the
Legislature,and other actively interested groups both in and out of the SAWPA
service area,we could never have achieved this important step. Your forward
thinking and active leadership has been instrumental in helping to secure long-term
water reliability and flood safety for the watershed.
I will keep you informed and updated as the SAWPA project progresses. Again,
thank you for your invaluable assistance.
Sincerely,
P. J ph Grindstaff
eral Manager
11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503 •(909)785-5411
Administration FAX(909)785-7076 s Planning FAX(909)352-3422
S
2
_ e
M,pp
Lf
l
I: 7
i
i byk=Yimmmir
Ally 3upq sWggn:Iw atl}o aouespe to lurid ay of ugof my .taimpui aaien 3utllunp agi )o suopou
sa3ueya ailew of paawd not op%I sansst.talt alp}o auo -lldw! ylleag atlgnd aqi}o maue slow s!auo otsl
OS •aq itl3tw smimin3ai uwn} legn no uopmuo}u! •euaiaeg lo}punoa3 gut
10 sasea Rios to imp uu!uyap Am 3ut.sey inoyl!.0 -p=q eaq mi imp alnlannseyu!3u!3e pm awuasw sR -
stromaap3mllewWft,sAes iagnH'slueldaalendui vans swawala 9uwn3ao AlIzinim ItumsAs auua^pua � .
-lluup}o saoieaado agl ao}so3ualleg3 asod osle twpq ayi idnasp imp sleitwaga -amMic apptgaaq porn
-113aa to sa3uega pueaimim to samenpe 3umuuuoj Alap!mayl'wntplodsoidlu puerple!3 se tans sagoaa k4w
�0! IVII lou pue sapp!gaag qi!.n -lw we sansst ylleaq atgnd 3ulutool ayi 3uowy
Pla!} ayi asnop Alle mg PIno3 noA 3tions oS m%imp ,�Poo3 Ala!e}51 Jalem del mo}o]Sow y3noyl mna
lurid a Se q painoi miens mau asagl }o auo ao} spe imig!u3!s uimw aaien del yl>.n sansm tpleaq none
Apea atp }o auo •Lsp-ns IpI of pauilmil am galy.u] -nq ayi•mou sa3ualleya lummy1p 3utie4 aa,am joy
sapp!yaatl 01 luels!su slow ag of m!wls lurid .nau s!wa19oad aU,,sip UOgO 0161 Ul}o pp 403 am
3upeaaa we aM„-sirs aagnH,:rind auo sasu9 ga!y.n '}o pu ia3 of deaya pue dsea m%inp pnls ayi„
mows 01 anupma of swans sapla!gaaq}o amayi„ •sai%Ppqun agl u!p!oydq pue walota se
•uo!ll!q lad sped autl}o lttu!l s;bua3y saswn oulaq-aaien tans 3ulmmwll Allmil!n'a Aanl
uopaaload lwwwumtnua agl paaaxa amen 3u! -uaa ayi u!Apea tPleaq aggnd of uooq snopwwane
,4uup to aupam}o slanal'AllmosmS •mi.3.m imp ut wam waumaai}o spotlaw asoyi•ssaawd agi oiu!
aaien 3utllwp}o aainos.Leuiud ayi'�alen aae}ans.siw pampoalu!mom sinlitugaai uotlaa}UlslP'Allr^luang
OWI AMA Si! sptg} 43tt04l]uuna Galen unwS St aUr •leualew DIUe3lo°I pue aturlim Paweiion anowm
-wle yll&t walgad ayy•sal+iunm uwdwna lwasas of wartmolga pue mi ip} vwnwuaw!pas 'uati ">
.iq pauueq uaaq set asn,A! qunotu mna „llaq nam„ ...-eiral— '(sapped paitmnun prime of aalem ayi �•. .
s eawwy se-umou>f-uo®a.i Rips-zi ay1 moy3nwyl wuq a3le43 aae}ans anq!wd e.tlgm lua3e poluuya •llli
pass Alap!m.st,ga!gm-.'awzwle so,tms-sapp!glaq--_a3ulpnd) notielnaml}-yltm-3upws-sassaacud}o
}o am Paseaaaur ayi ltuxle patwmm st Dale aagnH--sauas a y3n0iy1 lnd sl aalem 3wlluup Silpotdii-
•pound 1ey13manp ahem}o stwW 000'9}o a3eaane ,-o'Q'Uoy9u.4ma u' pa-03
uzButso,lol tptww e£1$•inoge Aedmovogm.slawoi -asuapa somnosall lwniag2tp ao;.iamom aotuase
-sm aoj allay airs luaaaad Zr ai lwaaad 01 a of saiel 'Uos1O llu3 sRes„'vagddnsaaiex a3lel agi}o iwa
-wwl leyy'mllpw 5l.$p:neumsa uelsoa ll!.nlueldayl . -.wd 06 umP MO-JO atw s lmP PU V'I RM PIJOtA
of siwuwanoatiuq lies=aq inq•'saaumq aldulnw 3upu ants p;mw;wacl seq aaiem Aen.atp u!sa9uey3 Rol
-ua le 3utilool srAuedworstl.):,•aagnH sles„lmwwax -ew Am ums l,wneg am i3V3upluuQaatetA a}eS
Rol simpugs aatoi.q_8uglas pue sa wojd asotu Sul agl}o Aaesiantuue LPSZ aqi s!aeais!tll P^0--sieaA
w-� pdo u,�.si ossassaaotd leiotwu-alapaed ln!sSgd ._ Sr lsel ag1 nano:aaless.3unluup3u!39nl lnage
aqi t fd^wyi s!eual3eq.agl-3uu —}o A—auo„ Aan} pue punos}o-wl a Uaag s aaagi g3^°glIV,,
sawuaq.Agjaofann!sodpaisaianeq otlmao uoni fw _ •s.teai 00l,lsowle
lueldsuwi nu{{iR lwnaadoy autatp m 3uplw sipped w uaa9 uaxl I,uSYti Iptgm}o sa>Iq atp imulleatl Gal
se yans''sapu;no up waisis aummor qi!. a1doad of ' •ea in twpnlonu e}o flung-ati of m!xauy pal seq
sttoa4uep6lpgaadsa am stustue lio .ur asayi left sT sp[u}° IfV•Utalq°id 3wseanof tm sr'elaalaeg aoq
ya!t{m}aatw'suosrazlea .--i=Winoqumow3w 'aequo,ga!q-,wnianpseyu!auti— epuehai-
-uawl u am in%reim aq „tuna uo spwwew uaaq 3utiluup_3tlgnd w wasmd.was&P=t.p=Rana auo
a,.equagise3uo1s ,ptmoleruaaganegimp-q—!ur_—otts-!—tls punofanet£owaisAs-3utua s-I-tld-
'wn!patldsoidiaa poor elpaet3 srtpns euatiegaleutwlla—dn-alen3mpesul sagoaalutaag3noi nsauue a�ayy
oi.uogs'sulaauoa utewNjaq^H)o au0;•.xoulnull - .•pllen sR aalen8unluupinogetuaiumspllgndagI
Rgnd - , .Lnittm sup}o
ois-Isu.ul mopnpas leluawanu! that anetq alatp 3muu"agile pam spoyaw awes agi Aq-patteala
quo lulod legs woai•s3utgi asogt lie pip Aagl lade ills %AeP.Lana Raft Aagi aaien dot atl letlt mount.
as}esAlgegaewaa se�s aaiessatli;,,.•sA�aapH m Pallaogs aq Plnom Algegold lstinaaiem ...
-hies pueaaiesi3tttiluupaggndulslttautantitdtu!wanp papioq-}o sueaao 3uts Pulp of wiletaneq .
.iluewud tpleltl atlgndurapeui s7ltautaauespe pomp . watp }O Auelnl •laleit aand an} isanll a m,,
-1103 aim uati p--,AUmugsgns p--u!A-m-d _uaaq aneq sueauawy 'mou awls awos 20.
xa a}ll 'S16C m 5981 woai,.•Ailawua)l ut-00 jai
-rM alpns!no-r plo--A-6£r agt}o lip-d'aagnH:
aa�onn aaiy�loay 'lauoap ao� j
tin ay-1 asiai of 6uiuui6aq si aiignd ay1 puo ,Gnjuaa
Isol ay-1 ui yanul pa6uoy-7 you soy IuawIoaal -JaJoM
developed or do you take action on move it?" Removing some of the newly con,it's very costly to do. Say some util-
what you know today?Your instinct is to discovered chemical,anJ lowering the at- its has 3,000 miles of waster mains and
protect the public, but it dues require ceptable levels that can be contained in they replace 30 miles a year.That's pretty
decision-making in a less-than-certain drinking water likely will require more s costly at$75 to 5150 a four.We are talk.
environment phisticated equipment than that in use ing about digging...and its not gerring
Contributing to that less-than-certain in many planes today.Gikkm worms. done at the level it should be.We have
emmomnent is the speed at which the And that will require money.If the Fin- to pick up the pace."
Environmental Protection Agency works. vironmental Protection Agency's top So what price then is the public going
For example, while the agency was di- water administrator, Chuck Fox, has his to be willing its pay for clean water?
rested by Congress 23 years ago
in review and rewe the maxi- America will spend more than $300 billion over
mum allowable levels of arsenic,
hhamssed done. deadlihe nes the next 20 years to upgrade treatment plants.
has missed three deadlines
since 1976,and doesn't plan to
issue a revised standard until January way,some of char money will come from "Ultimately,"Gildan says,"it's the pub-
2000. Increasing pressure,on the agency Washington."I really do see the reed to Its: that will have to decide whether its
is a report from the National Academy provide adequate funding as one of the worth a$2 m$5 increase in rates to m-
of Sciences that says the agency's 50 principal challenges we face as a nation move trace contaminants from water.
parrs per billion limit on the amount of in achieving our artier quality goals.Wa- Public education would assist this debate,
arsenic in drinking water mutt be low- ter quality is my mission,and clean water setting side by side what risks you're alk-
ered immediately. issme of the values that Americans have," ing about in an educated manner and not
"The agency's standard for arsenic in he says. "But it's also something tat re. in a fearful manner,like'Oh my God,my
surface water is around 20 parts per tril. quires a significant mwstment." water is terrible;but a discussion of what
lion.That's 2A00 times better than the A needs survey conducted by the the contaminant levels really mean."
standard for drinking water Essentially, agency estimates that America will spend Such a discussion could begin w early
it means you couldn't pan rap water into more than$300 Whom over the nett 20 as this October when the Environmental
the sounce water ifyou follow the agency's years to upgrade treatment plants in an Protection Agency will begin requiring
advice,"says Olson."des bizarre." effurr to improve water quality.Thom ex- water treatment operators w provide cm-
Ansennic is a particular problem in the peruses may go up as regulations change. summer with lists of the contaminants in
Southwest and northern net sates such "We estimate them is a significant gap their drinking water.
as Minnesom and Wisconsin, says Remy in terms ofarmual expenditures,"Smays. "I expect that this will have the same
Sachowiak, a technical sales manager "It'sagap that might be approaching more kind of effect on drinking water that the
for US Filter. "Arsenic is a common than$1 billion,though I expect m have toxics release inventory has had," says
element—the 20th most common ele- a better estimate by fall." David Rowe,a senior attorney for the En-
ment in the earth's crust," notes Still, Huber and Olson say the Envi. vironmentab Defense Fund. That 1986
Stachhowiak."An erriesalso the 12th most strummed Protection Agency ham't yet federal law required public disclosure of
common element in our body But it is taken into account how much it will cox emissions of about 600 chemicals from
a carcinogen and long-term exposure to to revamp America's aging water deliv- the nation's estimated 23,000 industrial
high levels of arsenic increases the risk ery system. One probhe t is that mineral facilities.In the last 10 years,there's been
of cancer" deposits that have accumulated over the 50 percent:reduction in emissions of the
How then to explain the delays on to years can breed bacteria chemicals on that list,Rowe says.
Environmental Protection Agency's part? "Infrastructure replacement and re- "That's an enormous drop in
One reason u that the agency tries to in- newel is a huge requirement that today pollution...[whe rl the law says you don't
dude stakeholders in every step of the de- is underfunded across America," says have to reduce it all,you just have to re-
velopment of new regulations in an at- Huber. "For water utilities, the delivery port it,"Rowe says."It seems to be more
tempt to cote odes that will withstand system often is 70 percent or more of the effective in bulk than all the laws that
scrutiny by scientists and the corms,since capital investment that a utility has to ordered specific emissions be cut"
the agency frequently is sued. make,but many of our w itersystems have Olson says public pressure is the untold
The other reason?Money. Arsenic is been around a long time and that buried stay in the water industry. "There is a
"a very high-cot item to treat," says infrastructure will not perform and last real brewing revolution in how water is
Sachowiak. And that's to remove just forever." delivered to people in the United Sates,"
one chemical, but the list grows longer As Olson puts it,"What it means is that he says "I drink the public demand for
every year. were living on the investments of our the change is growing.People already are
"As technology gets better,we're able great-grandparents...and that deferred voting with thew pocketbooks,switching
Loderectthumgstlimyouneverknewwere modernization is going to start hitting wbomledwaterand buyingfltersferthew
in the water,"says Phillip Gildan, head soon."Hitting right in the wallet- taps Clearly, people are dissatisfied with
of public infrastructure group of "If you can expect buried water system the quality of their tap water We dunk
Greenberg,Timing,P.A.,located in Palm inGasmscnme to butt 100 years,you should that most city cap wrier in the United
Beach,Fla-"But jnat because you can de- replace about 1 percent of the pipes a Sates is relatively safe. But there are a
tea it,does it mean that you have m re- year,"Huber says."When you book at the lot of qualfiers in that statement" era
54 August h999 Unlay Barmen
O
4
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 22, 1999
�oJN y ANITgr�oy
o �
�Y
Fcl'NQ TH ENV`Q��
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
v.
Minutes for Board Meeting
09/22/99
Page 2
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on September 22, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
A Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
X Brian Donahue Harty Dotson
X Norman Z Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
A Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
A Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
A Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; John Linder, Patrick
Miles; Bob Dolan; Mike Peternan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Layne Baroldi; Jim Herberg;
Chuck Winsor, Ed Torres
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Mary Lee; Joseph Berg; Don Hughes;
Kris Lindstrom
o
Minutes for Board Meeting
09/22/99
Page 3
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Debay reported that eight cities have held presentations on the Groundwater
Replenishment System project, and resolutions of support are being adopted.
It was also reported that the November and December Steering Committee and Board meetings
would be held on the third Wednesday—November 17�and December 161".
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager referred to items placed in the Directors'folders, which induded a letter
from Curt Pringle regarding the water bond issue, a report of the Commission on Building for the
210Century, and our response dated September 15"to the Orange County Grand Jury
regarding Coastal Water Quality and Urban Runoff in Orange County.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel, reported that the litigation was fully concluded on the Lou
Sangermano matter. All petitions by Mr. Sangermano for further appellate review were denied.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
August 25, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A'
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 08/15/99 08/31/99
Totals $9,249.062.41 $4,596,896.84
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was
presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the September 22,
1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on August 25, 1999 to be filed.
12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the September 1, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
Minutes for Board Meeting
09/22/99
Page 4
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 1, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to
enter into an agreement with the Municipal Water District of Orange County
(MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program for an amount not to
exceed$825,000 for each of the next five years.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD
99-16, Supporting the Best Management Practices for Water
Conservation.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Approve a budget amendment
of$139,000 for Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central
Generation System engines, increasing the total project cost not to exceed
$703200; and 2)Approve agreement with Advanced Engine Technology
Corporation (AETC), providing for additional engineering services to design,
install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring system for eight Central
Generation System engines in the amount of$269,256, for a total project cost of
$393,628, and an additional contingency of$10,872 for an overall amount not to
exceed $404,500.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services
Agreement with Cydus Envirosystems, Inc., for an Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
Demonstration, induding the design and construction of a test facility and
ongoing support for a one-year test, for an amount not to exceed$318,000, and
an additional contingency of$32,000.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A
verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee, re the September 2, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on September, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order 4 to
Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming
Engineering, Inc., authorizing a credit of$38,134, decreasing the total contract
amount to$1,423,631; and (2) accept Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement,
Contract No. 7-17, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Fleming
Engineering, Inc.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Ratify Change Order2 to Fire
Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, with First Fire Systems,
Inc., authorizing a credit of$3,250 and a time extension of 79 calendar days,
decreasing the total contract amount to$357,450.49; and (2) accept Fire Alarm
and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, as complete, authorizing execution
of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
1
Minutes for Board Meeting
09/22/99
Page 5
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget increase of
$42,196 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3,
Contract No. 3-38-3, for a total revised project budget of$6,386,196, and (2)
ratify Change Order 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Reach 3,
Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, authorizing an
addition of$85,191 and 26 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to
$5,269,546.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addendum 5 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, providing for
additional construction support services, for an additional amount of$27,687,
increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $515,632; and (2) and
approve a budget amendment of$27,687, increasing the total project budget to
$4,259,687.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, P.C., for Electrical
Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4, providing for additional engineering
services, for an additional amount of$91,848, increasing the total amount not to
exceed $2,077,376.
14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Mark Leyes, Vice Chair of the
Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the September 8, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held September 8, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of August 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly
Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 1999 through
June 30, 1999.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Purchase of New Financial
Information System (Specification No. P-172) as complete.
Director Mark Murphy abstained.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD
99-17, Amending District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services
Agreement with Gerald Jones for services re Reinvention Automation Project
(Job No. J-42) in the amount of$67.50 per hour plus actual travel expenses for a
two-year period, in an amount not to exceed $123,500 per year.
Director Peer Swan opposed.
Minutes for Board Meeting
09/22/99
Page 6
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Consideration of request by
Director Gullixson to have staff, General Counsel and the FAHR Committee
reevaluate and conduct further studies relating to granting refunds to Yorba Linda
(and other areas) property owners of sewer service charges paid by property
owners for parcels not connected to the District's system.
15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment
System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 24, 1999 to be
filed.
16. Following a brief report given by Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, it was:
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Authorize Environmental Science
Associates to prepare and circulate the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for
the Strategic Plan in compliance with CEQA requirements.
17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for
High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61; (2) Receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to R. Fox Construction,
Inc. for High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61, for an
amount not to exceed $201,700.
18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify use of General Manager's
Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 98-21, for purchase orders
issued in connection with the Huntington Beach closure for Investigation of Coast Trunk
Siphon(Specification No. P-188), in an amount not to exceed $455,000.
19. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos.
19(a)(1), (2) and (3).
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:
The Board convened in dosed session at 7:56 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 19(a)(1), (2)and (3).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:26 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m.
G
Secretary of trr , Board of ectors of
Orange CoudG Sanitatio istrict
H:wp.dtalnpenc!MBoard MInuteau999 Board M1nutmM2299.doo
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115M
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
21194 RPI/Bio Gro 6 120,056.30 Residuals Removal MO 4.26.95
21195 Bristol Systems, Inc. 30,997.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
21196 Burch Ford 70,408.80 41999 Ford Taunus LX
21197 Carollo Engineers 67,431.53 Engineering Services-P2.43.3,J-25-4 8 Document Mgmt. Project
21198 Cooper Energy Services 68.459.38 Engine Supplies
21199 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 71,151.36 Natural Gas-Spec It P-170
21200 Kaiser Foundation Hearth Plan 25.179.84 Medical Insurance Premium
21201 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 36,722.63 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
21202 Lincoln-Recp Fullerton OPCO,L.L.C. 83,412.94 Connection Fee Refund
21203 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 49,991.77 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
21204 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 60,715.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21205 Ryland Homes Group of Soulhem CA 91,922.00 Connection Fee Refund
21206 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 97,319.75 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94
21207 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 58,500.00 Research Project
21208 Southern California Edison 72.594.33 Power
21209 Stang Industrial Products 59,779.70 Digester Cleaning Monitor System
21210 SPEC Services,Inc. 269,159.24 Engineering Services J-33-1
21211 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 69,334.72 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21212 Union Dodge 43,756.20 21999 Dodge Quad Cab
21213 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 27,640.53 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
21214 Ark Construction Company 41,962.29 Construction P1-44-4
21215 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 248,756.40 Construction P2-65
21216 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 2,031.27 Long Distance Telephone Service
21217 ATint of Glass 75.00 Window Tinting
21218 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 172.50 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
21219 Air Uquide America Corporation 3,477.36 Specialty Gasses
21220 Airborne Express 21.75 Air Freight
21221 Allied Electronics,Inc. 183.99 Electrical Supplies
21222 Allied Supply Company 6.069.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21223 Allied Systems/Supply Co. 5.384.19 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
21224 American Airlines 12,968.39 Travel Services
21226 American Computer 8 Comm. 149.00 Computer Equipment Maint.
21226 Ponton Industries 377.13 Instrument Parts 8 Supplies
21227 Analysts,Inc. 1.060.69 Testing Kits
21228 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 000.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
21229 Applied Industrial Technology 101.70 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
21230 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 520.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21231 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal
21232 Associated Readymix Concrete 334.83 Concrete
21233 ASR Analysis 890.00 Vibration Analysis 5-41-1
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21234 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Service
21235 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 21.66 Telephone Service
21236 AT&T Wireless Service 3,970.37 Cellular Telephone Service
21237 AT&T Wireless Service 3.012.96 Cellular Telephone Service
21238 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
21239 Barnes&Noble Books 145.68 Publication
21240 Battelle-Northwest 14,815.00 Contract Services-Soil Testing
21241 Battery Special0es 1,374.12 Batteries
21242 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 10,935.24 Lab Supplies
21243 BloSpherical Instruments, Inc. 201.65 Instrument Maint.
21244 Black Box Corporation 835.65 Computer Supplies
21245 Boise Radiator Service 85.00 Truck Repairs
21246 Brizina&Associates 136.42 Lab Supplies
21247 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,780.00 Pump Supplies
21248 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 727.91 Service Agreement
21249 California Automatic Gate 149.48 Service Agreement
21250 California Relocation Services, Inc. 236.25 Moving Services
21251 Calolympic Safety 90.83 Safety Supplies
21252 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies
21253 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 1.684.82 Office Furniture
21264 Charles P.Crowley Co. 131.52 Instrument Parts
21255 City of Fountain Valley 15,548.88 Water Use
21256 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 1.760.69 Professional Services-Ergonomic
21257 Cole Scientific 77.34 Lab Services
21258 Compensation&Benefit Assn of San Diego 585.00 Subscription
21259 Compressor Components Of California 1.293.00 Pump Supplies
21260 Computers America, Inc. 1.607.76 Computer Supplies
21261 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,387.71 Electrical Supplies
21262 Continental-McLaughlin 94.57 Hardware
21263 Corporate Express 2.317.44 Office Supplies
21264 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,995.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899.09
21265 Cotelligenl 2,320.75 Professional Services-Computer
21266 County of Orange 35.00 Permit Fees
21267 County Wholesale Electric Co. 408.40 Electrical Supplies
21268 Cylec Industries 2.413.39 Anionic Polymer Spec.No. 9798-18
21269 CEM Corporation 1.425.60 Lab Supplies
21270 CMS,Inc. 4.364.60 Investigation Service
21271 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 140.46 Lab Supplies
21272 CR&R.Inc. 1,910.00 Container Rentals
21273 CWEA Membership 1,235.00 Membership
21274 Day-Timers,Inc. 27.74 Office Supplies
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115199
wartant No. Vendor Amount Description
21275 Del Mar Analytical 3,306.00 Biosolids Analysis
21276 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 3,231.43 2 Computer Workstations
21277 Delta Foam Products 118.18 Lab Supplies
21278 DeZudk C/O Misco/South West 7,631.39 Valves
21279 Don Maurer 6,300.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
21280 DMG-Maximus 2200.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan
21281 Electronic Transmission Smog System 18.90 Electrical Supplies
21282 Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
21283 Environmental Resources Associates 1.032.80 Lab Supplies
21284 ENS Resources,Inc. - 4,321.32 Professional Services-Legislative
21285 Fast Company 19.75 Subscription
21286 Faxpress, Inc. 256.98 Office Supplies
21287 FedEx Corporation 190.46 Air Freight
21288 Fibedron 5,679.64 Fiber Optic Cable
21289 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 8,720.49 Lab Supplies
21290 Forma Systems, Inc. 5,280.00 Professional Services-Geographical Information System Project
21291 Fountain Valley Camera 13.74 Photo Supplies
21292 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 352.50 Truck Wash Tickets
21293 Franklin Covey 62.60 Office Supplies
21294 Fry's Electronics 388.56 Computer Supplies
21295 City of Fullerton 358.11 Water Use
21296 General Electric Supply Company 174.74 Electric Parts
21297 Garraa-Callahan Company 2.395.55 Chemicals
21298 Gates Fiberglass Installers 998.67 Fiberglass Repair
21299 GTE California 1.807.05 Telephone Services
21300 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
21301 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,892.32 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
21302 Glenn's Tackle Shop 724.55 Lab Supplies
21303 WW Grainger,Inc. 1,180.35 Compressor Supplies
21304 Graybar Electric Company 425.62 Electrical Supplies
21305 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 733.01 Janitorial Supplies
21308 Haaker Equipment Company 612.11 Truck Supplies
21307 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples
21308 Harvard Business Review 95.00 Subscription
21309 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 176.63 Truck Supplies
21310 Hewlett-Packard 1,712.73 Lab Supplies
21311 HIM,Inc. 381.65 Tools
21312 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 450.00 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning
21313 Home Depot 26.64 Small Hardware
21314 Hopkins Technical Products 310.93 Pump Supplies
21315 City of Huntington Beach 11,686.89 Water Use
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21316 Imaging Plus, Inc. 487.23 Office Supplies
21317 StateNet 400.00 Online Service
21318 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 188.27 Lab Supplies
21319 Irvine Photo Graphics 5.58 Photographic Services
21320 Irvine Ranch Water District 22.64 Water Use
21321 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 157.76 Safety Supplies
21322 Jay's Catering 468.04 Catering Services
21323 Jensen Instrument Co. 910.62 Instrument Supplies
21324 Johnstone Supply 2.453.37 Electrical Supplies
21325 Joint Instrumentation Committee 180.00 Registration
21326 Kabbara Engineering 3,448.60 Professional Services-Traffic Control
21327 Industrial Distribution Group 3,166.91 Tools
21328 Lab Support 3.994.94 Temporary Employment Services
21329 LaserAll Corp. 1.149.51 Printer Service Agreement
21330 Lee&Ro,Inc. 7,177.36 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
21331 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,868.44 Architectural Services
21332 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 16,117.38 Engineering Services 2-37
21333 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,519.21 Mechanical Supplies
21334 Mandolin Publishing 195.00 Subscription
21335 Mar Vac Electronics 41.07 Instrument Supplies
21336 MasTec Network Services 5,000.00 Communication Service
21337 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1,085.47 Plumbing Supplies
21338 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,118.54 Tools
21339 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 6,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch Site Study
21340 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 684.99 Mechanical Repairs
21341 Mission Uniform Service 3.666.62 Uniform Rentals
21342 Motion Industries 324.73 Pump Supplies
21343 MotoPhoto 75.15 Photographic Services
21344 Nasco 292.54 Instrument Supplies
21345 National Plant Services,Inc. 3,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21346 Neal Supply Co. 2.476.30 Plumbing Supplies
21347 Oceans'99 496.00 Subscription
21348 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,726.93 Office Supplies
21349 Optio Software 16.575.00 Document Design Service
21350 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 124.94 Plumbing Supplies
21351 Orange County Vector Central District 1,578.82 Pest Control
21352 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 134.29 Electrical Supplies
21353 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 467.01 Fittings
21364 Ositech 309.00 Computer Supplies
21355 Oxygen Service Company 1.580.29 Specialty Gases
21358 OCB Reprographics 20,818.42 Printing Service-Spec P-173
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 W 8115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21357 Pacific Bell 18.93 Telephone Services
21358 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
21359 Pacific Mechanical Supply 214.59 Plumbing Supplies
21360 Parkhouse Tire Co. 2,162.13 Tires
21361 Parts Unlimited 837.57 Truck Supplies
21362 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 8,899.28 Engineering Service-Sewer Repair
21363 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2.162.18 Filters
21364 Pizza Hut of America,Inc. 291.00 Catering Services
21365 Polydyne,Inc. 24.203.06 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
21366 Powerware 34.72 Publication
21367 Primary Source 12.406.68 Office Furniture
21368 Quad Knopf,Inc. 1.209.40 Professional Services-Tule Ranch Site Study
21369 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
21370 Reliastar 7,808.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
21371 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,041.16 Life Insurance Premium
21372 Remedy Temp 3,138.54 Temporary Employment Services
21373 RPM Electric Motors 1,165.07 Electric Motor Repair
21374 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 65.72 Paint Supplies
21375 Safelite Glass Corp. 362.78 Auto Supplies
21376 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 296.58 Mechanical Supplies
21377 Schwing America,Inc. 8.794.19 Pump Supplies
21378 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 490.00 Lab Repairs
21379 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 6,080.66 Professional Services-Ocean Oudall Instrumentation
21380 Second-Sun 603.92 Light Fixtures
21381 Sewer Equipment Co.of Florida, Inc. 1.003.50 Sewer Pipe Supplies
21382 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 898.77 Tools
21383 Shepherd Machinery Co. 349.37 Truck Supplies
21384 Shopping.Com 28.41 Communication Equipment
21385 Shureluck Sales a Engineering 37.00 Tools/Hardware
21386 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
21387 Supelco,Inc. 1,260.48 Lab Supplies
21388 Smith Pipe 8 Supply,Inc. 185.32 Plumbing Supplies
21389 So.Cal.Gas Company 640.97 Natural Gas
21390 Sofi1lew Computer Products 399.30 Computer Supplies
21391 SoaChoice 3,463.55 Software
21392 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 310.20 Emission Fees
21393 Spading Instruments, Inc. 1,012.84 Meter
21394 Starbuck Truck Refinishing,Inc. 606.00 Painting Service
21396 State Board Of Equalization 288.00 Hazardous Waste Fee
21396 StudioVisia 13,520.00 Computer Consulting Services
21397 Summit Steel 2,117.44 Metal
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 811/99 to 8115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21398 Sunset Ford 159.30 Truck Supplies
21399 Sunset Industrial Parts 22.61 Mechanical Supplies
21400 Solar Turbines, Inc. 1.539.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21401 Taylor-Dunn 6,412.88 Electric Cart Parts
21402 Telemedia, Inc. 797.75 Training Software
21403 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis
21404 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 199.60 Mechanical Supplies
21405 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
21408 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 28.02 Locks&Keys
21407 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 80.00 Seminar Registration
21408 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 1.800.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
21409 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 252.91 Truck Supplies
21410 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 130.00 Lab Services
21411 Ultra Scientific 216.73 Lab Supplies
21412 Union Bank of California 1.443.73 Banking Services
21413 United Parcel Service 42.92 Parcel Services
21414 Unocal 76 92,59 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
21415 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 350.00 Registration
21416 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,340.86 Plumbing Supplies
21417 Verne's Plumbing 460.00 Plumbing Supplies
21418 Village Nurseries 40.99 Landscaping Supplies
21419 VCI Mechanical 385.00 Line Leak Detector Installation
21420 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,723.30 Lab Supplies
21421 Waters Corporation 495.00 Subscription
21422 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 5,990.90 Safety Supplies
21423 Western States Chemical,Inc. 17,660.77 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
21424 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 135.96 Publication
21425 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 7,759.91 Instrument Supplies
21426 Xerox Corporation 15.035.18 Copier Leases
21427 3T Equipment Company 15,283.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21428 Brown&Caldwell 21,408.85 Engineering Service Pl-37
21429 Systems Integrated 5,115.75 Construction Services J-31-3
21430 Thomas M.Flanagan 158.23 Meeting/Training Expense Relmb.
21431 Roland T.McReynolds 274.59 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
21432 Daniel R.Tremblay 1,684.95 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
21433 County of Orange 465.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
21434 Orange County Sanitation District 1,472.91 Petty Cash Reimb.
21435 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 374.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee
21438 Orange County Sanitation District 455.176.36 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
21437 A-Plus Systems 4,977.32 Notices&Ads
21438 American Training Resources, Inc. 479.49 Training Materials
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8I15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description'
21439 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 47.76 Telephone Service
21440 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
21441 Builders Book, Inc. 290.87 Publication
21442 Caesars Palace 1,657.89 Membership
21443 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
21444 Colvis Industries 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
21445 CASA 180.00 Conference Registration
21446 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 22.36 Lab Supplies-Freight
21447 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
21448 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
21449 GTE California 539.42 Telephone Services
21450 Oak Fabco/Industrial Steam 2,828.92 Pump Supplies
21451 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,702.89 Dues Deduction
21452 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 862.48 Safety Supplies
21453 Mar Vac Electronics 34.21 Instrument Supplies
21454 Mid-West Associates 13,024.34 Pump Supplies
21455 MSA-C/O Geoff Cobbett 160.00 Membership
21456 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 200.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
21457 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 490.00 Training Registration-Computer
21458 Orange County Family Support 498.60 Wage Garnishment
21459 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
21460 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 338.38 Fittings
21461 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel
21482 OCEA 809.02 Dues Deduction
21463 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
21464 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
21465 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
21466 Red Valve Company,Inc. 2,160.05 Mechanical Supplies
21467 So.Cal.Gas Company 367.26 Natural Gas
21468 Southern California Edison 9,239.75 Power
21469 Southern California Edison 7,835.35 Power
21470 Sperling Instruments, Inc. 250.00 Meter
21471 State of California 142.10 Wage Garnishment
21472 Summit Steel 554.67 Metal
21473 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
21474 1999 Energy Efficiency Forum 890.00 Membership
21475 Layne T.Baroldi 245.73 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
21476 David A. Ludwin 460.00 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimb.
21477 Douglas M.Stewart 545.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
21478 Jonathan K.Thomsic 190.41 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
21479 Charles F.Winsor 1.007.67 MeeBngfTraining Expense Reimb.
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21480 James L.Wybenga 248.67 Meeting/training Expense Reimb.
21481 Orange County Sanitation District 3,941.00 Workers Comp Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,823,713.41
Payroll Disbursements
15181 - 15370 Employee Paychecks $ 257.420.31 Bkveekly Payroll 8/11199
40397-40833 Direct Deposit Statements 644,732.06 Biweekly Payroll 8/11/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 902.152.37
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 151,140.59 August Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 161,339.96 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 133.056.63 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 2,509,554.79 Semiannual Principal 8 Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A COP
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 381,528.76 Semiannual Principal 8 Interest Payment on 1993 COP
Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 2,206,575.90 Semiannual Principal 8 Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C COP
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 6,523,196.63
Total Claims Paid 811199-8/15199 $ 9,249,062.41
Page 8 of 8
Claims Paid From 8/16199 to 8131/99 r
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
21482 Great American Printing Co. $ 3.029.59 Tools
21483 Aldoo Systems,Inc. 2,487.30 Electrical Supplies
21484 Air Cold Supply 42.68 Air Conditioner Repairs
21485 Air Products&Chemicals 23.451.95 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
21486 Airborne Express 89.70 Air Freight
21487 Alabama Poultry&Egg Association 150.00 Registration
21488 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 108.00 Subscription
21489 Allied Supply 3,556.00 Registration
21490 Ambience Unlimited 200.00 Raggedy Ann&Andy-Kids Day
21491 American Compensation Assoc. 25.00 Membership
21492 American Public Works Association 100.00 Membership
21493 Anchor Paving 2.400.00 Manhole Repair
21494 Anicam,Inc. 1,265.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies
21495 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
21496 Appleone Employment Service 8,344.50 Temporary Employment Services
21497 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 487.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21498 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 926.72 Waste Removal
21499 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
21600 ABB rIo Harold Wells Associates 4,601.39 Electrical Parts&Supplies
21501 AMA 395.00 Registration
21502 Westland Engineering C/O API BASCO 1,195.55 Mechanical Supplies
21503 ASAE 210.50 Publication
21504 ASR Analysis 782.00 Vibration Analysis 5-41-1
21505 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 44.91 Telephone Service
21506 Bailey.Fisher&Porter Company 760.00 Electrical Equipment Maint.
21507 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 2,150.00 Telephone Installation
21508 Barclays Law Publishers 60.00 Subscription
21509 Battery Specialties 632.79 Batteries
21510 Bauer Compressors 1,247.62 Safety Equipment Testing
21511 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 19A5 Lab Supplies
21512 Beta Technology, Inc. 2,580.37 Electrical Parts&Supplies
21613 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 20,545.42 Engineering Services-Can Gen Operating Philosophy Study
21514 Brinderson Corp. 2,170.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
21516 Bristol Systems, Inc. 11,603.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
21516 Business Objects Users Conference 1,590.00 Registration
21517 Buy.Com 2,608.75 Computer Supplies
21518 BOC Edwards 803.36 Lab Supplies
21519 Cal Protection 989.00 Electrical Services
21520 California Automatic Gate 1,667.28 Service Agreement
21521 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 6,229.78 Legal Service-Cartel
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From 8116199 to 8131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21522 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 2,668.50 Engineering Services-Air Quality
21523 Carlton V. Philips,Jr. 90.00 Legal Service-Porter Plating
21524 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 2.752.90 Office Furniture
21525 Chemical Transfer Company, Inc. 47.20 Freight
21526 Cincinnati Incorporated 3.001.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21527 Compu Master 249.00 Registration
21628 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 38.18 Electrical Supplies
21529 Converse Consultants 2.894.80 Consulting Services 6-12
21630 Corporate Express 1,520.64 Office Supplies
21531 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09
21532 Cost Containment Solutions 424.90 Worker's Camp.Services
21633 Cotelligent 480.00 Professional Services-Computer
21534 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1,796.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21535 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 802.46 Communication Equipment Repair
21536 County Wholesale Electric Co. 22.09 Electrical Supplies
21537 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
21638 CEM Corporation 311.40 Lab Supplies
21539 CH2MHill 8,881.00 Engineenng Services-Sulfide Control Demonstration Project
21540 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5.928.00 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers
21541 CR&R, Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals
21542 CWEA Annual Conference 220.00 Conference Registration
21543 Daily Pilot 100.00 Notices&Ads
21644 Dee Jaspers&Assoc. 4.543.46 Legal Services-Cartel
21545 Del Mar Analytical 248.00 Biosolids Analysis
21546 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 21.334.51 10 Computer Workstations
21547 DeZunk C/O Misco/SouthWest 129.30 Valves
21548 Doon America 670.00 Permit Fee Refund
21549 Thyssen Dover Elevator 2,532.67 Elevator Maintenance
21550 Embarcedero Technologies, Inc. 2.262.75 Software Maint.Agreement
21551 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
21552 FedEx Corporation 75.57 Air Freight
21553 Fibertron 755.00 Fiber Optic Cable
21564 Fidelity Graphic Products 48.00 Office Supplies
21555 First American Title Insurance Company 400.00 Legal Service-Documentation
21556 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,484.90 Lab Supplies
21557 Flo-Systems, Inc. 585.97 Pump Supplies
21558 Forestry Suppliers 52.57 Lab Supplies
21559 Fountain Valley Camera 81.08 Photo Supplies
21560 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 695.00 Truck Wash Tickets
21561 Fry's Electronics 707.98 Computer Supplies
21582 Ganahl Lumber Company 400.09 Lumber&12rdware
Page 2 of 8 .,
Claims Paid From 8/16199 to 8131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21683 GTE California 6,465.46 Telephone Services
21554 Gigs Information Group,Inc. 15,099.00 Membership
21565 Glenn's Tackle Shop 74.27 Lab Supplies
21566 Graseby S.T.I. 566.00 Engine Supplies
21567 Graybar Electric Company 5.251.46 Electrical Supplies
21568 H, R. Macklin&Sons,Inc. 4,000.00 Professional Service-Land Appraisal
21569 Hamilton Company 277.20 Lab Supplies
21570 Harold Primrose Ice 98.00 Ice For Samples
21571 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 3,081.35 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning
21572 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium
21573 Home Depot 246.19 Small Hardware
21574 Horizon High Reach 3.900.00 Safety Compliance Training
21575 Hydrotex 4.476.69 Lube Oil
21576 Industrial Air Compressor 776.22 Equipment Rental
21577 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 219.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21578 Information Resources 710.00 Personnel Services
21579 Irvine Photo Graphics 34.73 Photographic Services
21580 Irvine Ranch Water District 47.46 Water Use
21581 IBM Corp. 2,093.80 Maim.Agreement
21582 IBM Corporation 10,000.00 Professional Service-Internet Vulnerability
21583 Aligns Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 805.68 Safety Supplies
21584 ISATECH/1999 525.00 Registration
21585 ISI lnfortext 1,652.80 Subscription
21686 J&B Auto Parts 45.06 Auto Parts&Supplies
21587 J.O'Brien Company,Inc. 854.22 Computer Supplies
21588 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 1.530.00 Registration-Technical Integration&Upgrade
21689 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 1,199.25 Misc.Construction Services
21590 Jay's Catering 2,712.84 Catering Services
21591 Jobs Available, Inc. 515.20 Notices&Ads
21592 Johnstone Supply 20.50 Electrical Supplies
21593 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 2,082.33 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
21594 Kelly Paper 76.34 Paper
21595 Industrial Distribution Group 683.07 Tools
21596 Lab Support 8,138.47 Temporary Employment Services
21597 Labware, Inc. 1.500.00 Registration
21598 LaserAll Corp. 50.00 Printer Service Agreement
21599 Lee Valley Tools 877.85 Tools
21600 Lexis-Nexis 474.03 Books&Publications
21601 Linkage,Inc. 5,680.00 Training Registration
21602 Long Beach Line-X 1,059.59 Truck Supplies
21603 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. 300.00 Architectural Services
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 8116199 to 8/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21604 Los Angeles Times 603,40 Notices 8 Ads
21605 Lucd's 95.00 Meeting Expense
21606 Maintenance Technology Corp. 350.66 Welding Supplies
21607 McGarry Central 1.209.00 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement
21608 Medlin Controls Co. 563.80 Instrument Supplies
21609 Mission Uniform Service 3,565.07 Uniform Rentals
21610 Mitchell Instrument Co. 3,061.00 Instruments
21611 Moreland 6 Associates 1,160.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
21612 Motion Industries 292.36 Pump Supplies
21613 MotoPhoto 236.15 Photographic Services
21614 National Plant Services,Inc. 17.036.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21615 Network Installation Corporation 1,830.40 Office Equipment Earthquake Reinforcement
21816 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 804.02 LubricantlDiesel Fuel
21617 Ninyo 8 Moore 1,661.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
21518 The Noroo Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
21619 NAS Associates, Inc. 1.447.00 Lab Services
21620 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.062.50 Office Supplies
21621 OhmarWEGA Corp. 3,865.46 Instrument Mart. Service
21622 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 12.29 Plumbing Supplies
21623 Orange County Sanitation District 9.359.09 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
21624 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 338.25 Electrical Supplies
21625 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe 2.000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel
21826 Oxygen Service Company 1,328.64 Specialty Gases
21627 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 210.11 Electrical Supplies
21628 Pacific Bell 47.84 Telephone Services
21629 Pacific Mechanical Supply 287.99 Plumbing Supplies
21630 Pagenet 1.662.84 Rental Equipment
21631 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1.844.00 Filters
21632 Petoo Animal Supplies,Inc. 3228 Lab Supplies
21633 Polydyne, Inc. 22,138.77 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
21634 Port Supply 163.78 Rope
21635 Power Lift Corporation 1,100.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training
21636 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental
21637 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin.
21638 Quad Knopf,Inc. 2,131.30 Professional Services-Tule Ranch Site Study
21639 Quality Building Supply 264.40 Landscaping Supplies
21640 R. L.Abboll 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
21641 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
21642 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 334.98 Lab Supplies
21643 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,084.94 Life Insurance Premium
21644 Rockhursl College Continuing Education 195.00 Registration
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 8116199 to 8131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21645 RPM Electric Motors 5,818.65 Electric Motor Repair
21646 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 684.99 Paint Supplies
21647 Saratoga Institute 927.93 Publication
21648 Schneider Electric 5,296.50 Software Maim.Agreement
21649 Schwing America,Inc. 333.88 Pump Supplies
21650 Scientific Refrigeration 2,244.65 Refrigerator Repair
21651 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 180.37 Specialty Gases
21662 City of Seal Beach 126.68 Water Use
21653 Sears Industrial Sales 530.14 Mechanical Supplies
21654 Second-Sun 411.99 Light Fixtures
21655 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 214.51 Tools
21656 Shepherd Machinery Co. 157.36 Truck Supplies
21657 Sheraton Harbor 713.02 Registration
21658 Siemon, Larsen 8 Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
21669 Siena Automated Valve Services, Inc. 959.01 Plumbing Supplies
21660 SkillPath Seminars 198.00 Training Registration
21661 Voided Check - -
21662 Snap-On Incorporated 92.94 Tools
21663 So.Cal.Gas Company 14,474.94 Natural Gas
21664 SofiView Computer Products 126.57 Computer Supplies
21665 SoftChoice 282.31 Software
21666 South Coast Water 50.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
21667 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1.060.50 Painting Service
21668 Voided Check - -
21669 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 6,945.00 Landscape Maim.
21670 Sunset Industrial Parts 623.02 Mechanical Supplies
21671 Technomic Publishing Company,Inc. 64.13 Publication
21672 The Register 108.00 Notices 8 Ads
21673 Thermo LabSystems, Inc. 6,550.00 Lab Equipment Maint.
21674 Thomas M.Dawes 4,760.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97
21675 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 473.21 Mechanical Supplies
21676 Tomell B Cotten 250.00 Legal Services-Cartel
21877 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 520.00 Seminar Registration
21678 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 160.00 Lab Services
21679 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,685.20 Lab Supplies
21680 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters
21681 Ultra Scientific 232.46 Lab Supplies
21682 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 26.00 Membership
21683 United Parcel Service 120.08 Parcel Services
21684 Unocal 76 30.90 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38.1
21685 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 2,308.02 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 6/16/99 to 8131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21686 Valley Cities Supply Company 76.14 Plumbing Supplies
21687 Verve's Plumbing 5.860.00 Plumbing Supplies
21688 Vision Service PlarF(CA) 14.716.08 Vision Service Premium
21689 VCI Mechanical 600.00 Electrical Service
21690 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,529.30 Lab Supplies
21691 The Wackenhut Corporation 11,928.05 Security Guards
21692 Waters Corporation 4.259.75 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment
21693 Waxie Sanitary Supply 1.389.26 Janitorial Supplies
21694 We0ec'99 640.00 Registration
21895 Wells Supply Company 173.48 Plumbing Supplies
21696 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 10,074.62 Instrument Supplies
21697 Xerex Corporation 5,535.87 Copier Leases
21698 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 213.24 Office Supplies
21699 Yokogavaa Corp.of America 285.38 Instrument Supplies
21700 3CMA 480.00 Registration
21701 Nicholas J.Arhontes 307.44 Meetinglrraining Expense Reimb.
21702 Robert M.Bell 120.110 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb.
21703 Pongsakdi Cady 120.00 Meeting/rreining Expense Reimb.
21704 Jerry F. Evangelista 370.40 Meeting/training Expense Reimb.
21705 Chuck Hodge 1,144.92 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
21706 Andrei loan 602.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
21707 Kathleen T. Millea 560.00 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb.
21708 Sharon Nelius 1.145.05 Meeting/naming Expense Reimb.
21709 So Coast Air Quality Management District 327.80 Registration-Rideshare Program
21710 Henry Lorimer&Fry's Electronics 2,909.24 Employee Computer Loan Program
21711 Jim Elo&Micro Center 2,267.51 Employee Computer Loan Program
21712 League Of California Cities 25.00 Registration
21713 Orange County Sanitation District 932.18 Petty Cash Reimb.
21714 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 105.962.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R
21715 Voided Check - -
21716 Cooper Energy Services 26.903.50 Engine Supplies
21717 Delta Dental 41,949.91 Dental Insurance Plan
21718 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 425,269.19 Construction 3-38-1 &7-17
21719 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 53,826.28 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
21720 James Martin&Co. 171,668.15 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO 5/27/98
21721 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 93,281.19 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
21722 Mike Pdich&Sons 111,835.00 Construction 6-12
21723 Pamewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarkefing Agreement
21724 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 35,252.29 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21726 Reliastar 25,088.54 Employee Medical Health Premium
21726 Sarkon Engineering,Inc. 260.055.00 Construction 2-34R
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 8118/99 to 8131199 I
Werrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21727 Southern California Edison 41,690.37 Power
21728 SCAP 31,226.69 BRSC Assessment Fee&Kim County Expert Witness Expense
21729 Voided Check - -
21730 The Trans Company 25,873.58 Electrical Supplies
21731 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 41,979.62 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21732 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 137,290.65 Construction 3-38-1
21733 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 40,256.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
21734 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 54.336.81 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
21735 Western States Chemical,Inc. 46,875.41 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
21738 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 77,674.40 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
21737 Reliestar 11,754.92 Employee Medical Health Premium
21738 Boyle Engineering Corporation 25,304.62 Engineering Services 3-38-1 &7-27
21739 Brown&Caldwell 250,781.40 Engineering Services J-35-1 &Pi-37
21740 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 48.842.25 Professional Services J-40-4
21741 Orange County Sanitation District 409,218.28 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
21742 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 178,828.82 Engineering Services J42
21743 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 67.267.22 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21744 Abesco 521.36 Hardware
21745 Airgas Dry Ice 3.10 Lab Supplies
21746 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group,Inc. - 8,500.00 Training Registration
21747 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 653.54 Valve Supplies
21748 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
21749 BNI Building News 720.00 Registration
21750 Camilo Engineers 7.660.19 Engineering Services P1-36-2
21751 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
21752 Consolidated Elect, Distributors,Inc. 1,852.86 Electrical Supplies
21753 Consulting Psychologists Press 377.19 Training Supplies
21754 Diane Kilpatrick 611.07 Wage Garnishment
21755 DGA Consultants,Inc. 24,495.08 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
21756 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 900.00 Training Registration
21757 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
21758 Gartner Group, Inc. 23,400.00 Research Advisory Service
21759 Government Finance Officers Association 450.00 Financial Reporting Review Fee
21760 Harbour Engineering Group 11,700.00 Pump Supplies
21761 Holmes&Newer,Inc. 4.595.55 Engineering Services Pt-44
21762 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 346.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
21763 Infotec Santa Ana 900.00 Registration
21764 Ind Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 601 1.688.58 Dues Deduction
21765 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 51.64 Safety Supplies
21766 ISATECH/1999 175.00 Registration
21767 Laraine Pipoly and the Law Offices of Mark Plummer 12,000.00 Claim Settlement
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 8116199 to 8131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21768 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 69.03 Engineering Services 2-37
21769 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,429.01 Tools
21770 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2.390.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
21771 Oceans'99 100.00 Registration
21772 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
21773 Orange County Forum 30.00 Registration
21774 Orange County Marshal 65.00 Wage Garnishment
21775 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 3,521.69 Electrical Supplies
21776 OCB Reprographics 35.56 Printing Service-Spec P-173
21777 OCEA 612.26 Dues Deduction
21778 Pacific Bell 79.28 Telephone Services
21779 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
21780 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
21781 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
21782 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 4,798.60 Tools/Hardware
21783 Snap-On Incorporated 13.36 Tools
21784 So.Cal. Gas Company 6.44 Natural Gas
21785 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 12,956.95 Emission Fees-Plant 1
21786 State of California 134.05 Wage Garnishment
21787 Textile Engineering Associates 510.18 Bell Press Supplies
21788 Foxboro Company 19.76 Instrument Supplies
21789 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4.346.40 Mechanical Supplies
21790 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 40.00 Seminar Registration
21791 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
21792 Blake Anderson 283.79 Meefing/rraining Expense Reimb.
21793 City of Huntington Beach 100.00 Permit Fee-Job No.J-33-1
21794 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 18,867.17 Emission Fees-Plant 2
21795 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 137.290.66 Construction 3-38-1
21796 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 17,900.00 Professional Services- Contingency Plans 8 Procedure Project
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,733,385.29
Payroll Disbursements
15371 - 15504 Employee Paychecks $ 183.988.48 Biweekly Payroll 825/99
15505- 15506 Employee Paychecks 16,278.58 Adjustment 8 Termination
40834-41271 Direct Deposit Statements 657,938.87 Biweekly Payroll 825199
15507- 15527 Directors'Paychecks 5,305.62 Payroll 827199
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 863,511.55
Total Claims Paid 8116199-8/31/99 $ 4,596,896.84
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MmUng Date To ed.aDir.
10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Nomber I im.Nurr e
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECA FINDINGS
N/A
\4a]n,Wala1\wp.ElaY V3PaWMga\K9FILES4JaMepaiaEa
aw;,ae. arnrea Page 1
ATTACHMENTS
t
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 9/1/99 -- 9/15/99 & 9/16/99 — 9/30/99.
BA
madcnmin�.a.dlavm@2MW dgeWFLLESWa,msp d d o
R.,.,. e 8 Page 2
R �
Claims Paid From 9/1199 to 9115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
21797 RPI/Bio Gro E 87.394.81 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
21798 Blue Cross of California 176.826.02 Medical Insurance Premium
21799 Bristol Systems, Inc. 47,160.42 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
21800 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 29,119.44 12 Computer Workstations& 1 Dell Inspiron Notebook Computer
21801 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 75,736.80 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
21802 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 42,471.50 Consulting Services-FIS Support
21803 Hewlett-Packard 60,640.65 Lab Supplies
21804 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 26,773.25 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
21805 Pacific Investment Management Co. 121,809.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95-97
21806 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 121,500.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21807 Southern California Edison 74,326.54 Power
21808 StudioVisia 25.360.00 Computer Consulting Services
21809 Tule RanchlMagan Farms 34,969.32 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
21810 U.S. Geological Survey 92,000.00 Ocean Monitoring Program-Bottom Mapping
21811 Ark Construction Company 66,612.96 Construction P1444
21812 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 136.896.75 Construction P2-65
21813 Southern Contracting Company 201,571.00 Construction P247-1 -
21814 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,998.58 Long Distance Telephone Service
21815 Great American Priming Co. 131.53 Office Supplies
21816 Aearo Company 1,540.00 Safety Supplies
21817 Airborne Express 31.15 Air Freight
21818 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 1.718.47 Plumbing Supplies
21819 American Airlines 6.840.94 Travel Services
21820 American Fisheries Society 198.45 Publication
21821 American Management Association 1,425.00 Registration
21822 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 472.00 Lab Supplies
21823 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
21a24 Appleone Employment Service 12,003.13 Temporary Employment Services
21825 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 610.94 Audio Video Services
21826 Awards&Trophies By Bea 42.02 Plaques
21827 AMAI/Keye Productivity Center 159.00 Registration
21828 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Service
21829 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 120.16 Telephone Service
21830 AT&T Wireless Service 4,073.36 Cellular Telephone Service
21831 AT&T Wireless Service 9,490.42 Cellular Telephone Service
21832 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
21833 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 415.02 Electrical Supplies
21834 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 3,893.18 Telephone Installation
21835 Battelle 5,162.00 Engineering Services Pi-51
Page 1 of 14
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21836 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries
21837 Bell Pipe 8 Supply Co. 450.50 Valve Supplies
21838 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 27.76 Office Supplies
21839 Big Tex Trailers 4,635.93 20 Ft. Utility Trailer
21840 Boise Radiator Service 380.36 Truck Repairs
21841 Builders Book, Inc. 201.26 Publication
21842 Bureau of National Affairs 1,648.58 Subscription
21843 Business Objects Users Conference 795.00 Registration
21844 C.S.U.F.Foundation 8,750.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research
21845 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 9.21 Service Agreement
21846 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor
21847 Camall Corp. 10.672.46 UPS Batteries
21848 Canus Corporation 16,225.99 Fiber Optic Cable
21849 Cad R.Nelson, P.E. 250.00 Engineering Consultant 241
21850 Carlton V. Philips,Jr. 1,208.15 Legal Service-Porter Plating
21851 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 3,399.00 Engineering Services Pl-62
21852 W.A.Chamstrom Co.,Inc. 740.70 Office Supplies
21853 Chem Lab Supplies 213.35 Chemical
21854 City of Fountain Valley 122.47 Sewer Line Inspection 3-35R
21855 Clemson University 4.770.00 Training Registration
21856 Coast Fire Equipment 5.942.91 Service Agreement
21857 Cole-Pamrer Instrument Co. 217.17 Lab Supplies
21868 Compaq Computer Corporation 717.62 Computer Supplies
21859 Compressor Components Of California 1,293.00 Pump Supplies
21860 Connell GM Pads 49.45 Truck Supplies
21861 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4.1 D4.52 Electrical Supplies
21862 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 14.81 Plumbing Supplies
21863 Continental Construction 3,338.61 Service Contract-Electrical Repair
21864 Converse Consultants 159.50 Testing Services P2-65
21865 Cooper Energy Services 4,556.72 Engine Supplies
21866 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
21867 Corporate Express Imaging 321.10 Misc. Computer Supplies
21868 Corporate Express 1.020.27 Office Supplies
21869 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.94 Truck Pads
21870 Cotelligent 271.25 Professional Services-Computer
21871 County of Orange 99.00 Permit Fees
21872 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,038.80 Electrical Supplies
21873 Creative Business Concepts 375.25 Professional Service-Computer
21874 CH2M Hill 3.683.62 Professional Service-Odor Screening
21875 Confidential Mgt.Services, Inc. 552.53 Investigation Service
Page 2 of 14 ♦ �.
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21876 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 1.867.12 Lab Supplies
21877 CWEA Membership 45.00 Membership
21878 Dapper Tire Co. 707.94 Truck Tires
21879 David R.Woodruff,Agricultural Consultant 7,930.00 Professional Service-Siosolid Sites Soil Sampling&Analysis
21880 David's Tree Service 4.675.00 Tree Removal
21881 Debin Enterprises 3.327.32 Hot Water Boiler-Admin. Bldg.
21882 DeZur k C/O MiscolSouthWest 678.83 Valves
21883 Don Maurer 2,520.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
21884 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 197.29 Paint Supplies
21885 Electronic Transmission Smog System 20.70 Electrical Supplies
21886 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
21887 Environmental Data Solutions Grps, L.L.0 9,600.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
21888 Environmental Express 1,616.67 Lab Supplies
21889 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,205.57 Professional Services-Legislative
21890 F. H. Pumps 1,304.03 Pump Supplies
21891 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 257.72 Maint. Service Agreement
21892 Faxpress, Inc. 2,248.63 Office Supplies
21893 FedEx Corporation 155.24 Air Freight
21894 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
21895 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 9,448.03 Lab Supplies
21896 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 50.00 Concrete Cutting
21897 Fountain Valley Camera 66.67 Photo Supplies
21898 Foxboro Company 18.71 Publication
21899 Franklin Covey 794.85 Office Supplies
21900 Garrad-Callahan Company 2.465.32 Chemicals
21901 GTE California 1,555.55 Telephone Services
21902 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 11,487.24 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
21903 Glenn Lukos&Associates 8,168.54 Engineering Service 241
21904 Glenn's Tackle Shop 10.45 Lab Supplies
21905 Graphic Distributors 661.16 Photographic Supplies
21906 GTE 14,427.42 Telephone Services
21907 Hach Company 1.881.77 Lab Supplies
21908 Hamilton Company 78.68 Lab Supplies
21909 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 38.15 Plumbing Supplies
21910 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 711.15 Truck Supplies
21911 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 597.30 Catering Services
21912 Hilt!, Inc. 348.24 Tools
21913 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 304.37 Compressor Parts
21914 Home Depot 110.25 Small Hardware
21915 City of Huntington Beach 14,638.61 Water Use
Page 3 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9M 5199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21916 Industrial Air Compressor 2.801.50 Equipment Rental
21917 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary Mgmt 6,946.00 On-Site Pulmonary&Audlometric Testing
21918 StateNet 200.00 Online Service
21919 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 688.27 Lab Supplies
21920 Inside CAL/EPA 585.00 Subscription
21921 Interstate Battery Systems 205,64 Batteries
21922 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
21923 IBM Corp. 7,595.37 Maint.Agreement-AS/400
21924 IOMA's Salary Surveys 217.95 Subscription
21925 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 959.87 Safety Supplies
21926 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1.606.89 Instrument Supplies
21927 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 12,488.24 Misc. Construction Services
21928 Jay's Catering 1.120.72 Catering Services
21929 K. S. Dunbar&Associates 12.375.00 Engineering Services 2-41
21930 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24.971.41 Medical Insurance Premium
21931 Kelly Paper 40.74 Paper
21932 Industrial Distribution Group 963.70 Tools
21933 Lab Safely Supply, Inc. 319.99 Safety Supplies
21934 Lab Support 14,806.99 Temporary Employment Services
21935 Labeltronix 827.10 Office Supplies
21936 Voided Check - -
21937 LaserAll Corp. 820.75 Printer Service Agreement
21938 La Molts Chemical Products 377.67 Sulfide Test Kit
21939 Lieber,Cassidy&Frierson 97.00 Registration
21940 Long Beach Line-X 990.19 Truck Supplies
21941 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2,694.98 Architectural Services
21942 MarVac Electronics 292.16 Instrument Supplies
21943 Mc Junkin Corporation 1.293.00 Plumbing Supplies
21944 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 207.28 Tools
21945 Mesa Muffler 93.89 Truck Supplies
21946 Microsoft Corporation 2.450.00 Software
21947 Milltronics, Inc. 489.22 Electrical Supplies
21948 Mission Uniform Service 3.355.23 Uniform Rentals
21949 MotoPhoto 72.88 Photographic Services
21950 N. Glantz&Son 565.69 Safety Supplies
21951 National Institute of Bids&Technology 3,655.00 Lab Supplies
21952 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
21953 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services
21954 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
Page 4 of 14 w
l'
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21955 Neal Supply Co. 109.74 Plumbing Supplies
21956 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 490.00 Training Registration-Computer
21957 City of Newport Beach 73.35 Water Use
21958 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14.353.37 LubricantlDiesel Fuel
21959 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
21960 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,140.85 Office Supplies
21961 Optio Software 1.552.21 Software Maint.
21962 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 15.74 Electrical Supplies
21963 Orrick, Herrington& Sutcliffe 2,500.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel
21964 Oxygen Service Company 981.49 Specialty Gases
21965 OCB Reprographics 2,230.21 Printing Service-Spec P-173
21966 Pack Bell 1.845.29 Telephone Services
21967 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,633.03 Plumbing Supplies
21968 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 63.10 Mechanical Supplies
21969 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 442.80 Tires
21970 Parts Unlimited 758.35 Truck Supplies
21971 Peak Technologies 104.08 Lab Supplies
21972 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 19.114.86 Lab Supplies
21973 Polydyne, Inc. 12,910.91 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
21974 Power Maintenance International, Inc. 1,58220 Maintenance Agreement
21975 Power Systems Testing 900.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services
21978 Precision Industries 620.22 Mechanical Supplies
21977 Primary Source 407.87 Office Furniture
21978 Prodata 179.00 Software Maint.
21979 COS, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
21980 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair
21981 Ryan Herce Products Corp. 355.58 Basket Strainers for Polymer Use
21982 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services- Design Documents
21983 RPM Electric Motors 670.07 Electric Motor Repair
21984 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2,125.35 Motor Repair
21985 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 899.43 Mechanical Supplies
21986 Sears Industrial Sales 250.68 Mechanical Supplies
21987 Second-Sun 538.02 Light Fixtures
21988 Shepherd Machinery Co. 349.37 Truck Supplies
21989 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,600.30 Tools/Hardware
21990 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 20.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
21991 Sigma Chemical Co 2.052.18 Lab Supplies
21992 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 30.29 Plumbing Supplies
21993 SoftChoice 282.31 Software
21994 Southern California Edison Company 2,231.97 Claim Settlement
Page 5 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
21995 Southern California Water 66.88 Water Use
21996 Sparkletts 5,947.46 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
21997 Spex Cedprep, Inc. 365.66 Lab Supplies
21998 Sprint 32.10 Long Distance Telephone Service
21999 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 1,212.00 Painting Service
22000 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 530.73 Office Supplies
22001 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
22002 Sunset Industrial Parts 81.56 Mechanical Supplies
22003 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
22004 Symcas-TSG 1,668.82 Consulting Services
22005 Syscom, Inc. 2,700.00 Software Maint.
22006 SKC-West, Inc. 174.49 Safety Supplies
22007 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 814.41 Electric Cart Parts
22008 Textile Engineering Associates 5,448.92 Belt Press Supplies
22009 The Meniwood Corporation 2,795.28 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
22010 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 476.56 Mechanical Supplies
22011 Thyssen Dover Elevator 150.00 Elevator Maintenance
22012 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
22013 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 61.42 Locks&Keys
22014 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 16,800.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
22015 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 19.74 Truck Supplies
22016 Teksystems 13,468.75 Temporary Employment Services
22017 Ultra Scientific 69.28 Lab Supplies
22018 United Parcel Service 704.80 Parcel Services
22019 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,304.43 Plumbing Supplies
22020 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 187.91 Electrical Supplies
22021 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 12,735.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
22022 Vortex Ventures 575.75 Mechanical Supplies
22023 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10,203.28 Lab Supplies
22024 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards
22025 Water Environment Federation 888.25 Publication
22026 Western States Chemical, Inc. 23.078.98 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22027 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3.134.23 Instrument Supplies
22028 Wyatt Data Services 269.00 Publication
22029 Xerox Corporation 6,583.00 Copier Leases
22030 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 26.66 Office Supplies
22031 Robert P.Ghirelli 190.74 MeetingRreining Expense Reimb.
22032 John W. Swindler 120.00 Meeting/training Expense Reimb.
22033 David Rodriguez&Nyton Computer 2,317.68 Employee Computer Loan Program
22034 Selwyn D.Mansell 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
Page 6 of 14 w
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22035 Orange County Sanitation District 1,694.80 Petty Cash Reimb.
22036 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 26,299.05 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
22037 Nat West Markets 66,204.88 COP Letter of Credit Fees
22038 Orange County Sanitation District 422.409.71 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22039 Orange County Water District 142,983.59 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
22040 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 108,286.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22041 Pro Logis Trust 648.496.00 Connection Fees Refund
22042 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 720.00 Registration
22043 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 11.07 Telephone Service
22044 AWWA 480.00 Registration
22045 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22046 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
22047 Connell GM Parts 380.85 Truck Supplies
22048 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22049 Elser Constructors,Inc. 110.00 Plans&Specs Refund
22050 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
22051 GTE California 1,371.02 Telephone Services
22052 GTE Hawaii 64.27 Telephone Service-3 Way Conference Call
22053 Hams&Company 100.00 Registration
22054 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,101.87 Dues Deduction
22055 ISSA 200.00 Registration
22056 Labware, Inc. 3.500.00 Registration
22057 Lucci's 105.00 Meeting Expense
22058 MasTec Network Services 2,818.78 Communication Service
22059 Network Construction Services 2.487.00 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project
22060 Oracle Open World 3,390.00 Registration
22061 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22062 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
22063 Orange Courier 9.90 Courier Services
22064 OCEA 619.08 Dues Deduction
22065 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22066 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22067 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
22068 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 471.05 Publication
22069 Schreiber Corporation 11,044.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment
22070 Shopping.Com 158.24 Publication
22071 SkillPath Seminars 5.400.00 Training Registration
22072 SoftView Computer Products 643.94 Computer Supplies
22073 Southern California Edison 7,351.17 Power
22074 State of California 125.39 Wage Garnishment
Page 7 of 14
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22075 SETAC 465.00 Registration
22076 ThlydWave 5,940.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project
22077 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 118.49 Mechanical Supplies
22078 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 165.00 Seminar Registration
22079 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
220M VWR Scientific Products Corporation 59.01 Lab Supplies
22081 Edward M.Torres 359.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22082 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 6,000.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22083 Burch Ford 27,341.56 1999 Ford F-250 Truck
22084 Commercial Resources Tax Group 125,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin.
22085 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 180,434.40 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22088 Delta Dental 83,233.20 Dental Insurance Plan
22087 Dionex Corporation 51.389.84 Lab Supplies
22088 DMG-Maximus 66,670.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
22089 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 39.096.45 Professional Services J404
22090 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 149,587.57 Misc. Construction Services
22091 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 90.864.23 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
22092 National Plant Services, Inc. 34,906.25 Vacuum Truck Services
22093 Orange County Water District 49,852.80 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
22094 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 25,096.94 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
22095 Southern California Edison 57,069.47 Power
22096 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 42.672.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 110.359.66 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
22098 Western States Chemical, Inc. 29.387.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
22099 Advanco Constructors, Inc, 108.011.70 Construction 541-1
22100 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 245,160.40 Construction 3-35R&3-11R
22101 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 48.475.83 Construction 3-38-1 &7-17
22102 Sancen Engineering, Inc. 61,110.00 Construction 2-34R
22103 A.M. Best Company, Inc. 177.90 Subscription
22104 A-Plus Systems 4,244.04 Notices&Ads
22105 AccuStandard, Inc. 268.25 Lab Supplies
22106 Great American Printing Co. 1.996.65 Office Supplies
22107 Aidco Systems, Inc. 81.87 Electrical Supplies
22108 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
22109 Airborne Express 28.50 Air Freight
22110 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies
22111 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 218.90 Mechanical Supplies
22112 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 4.242.62 Plumbing Supplies
22113 American Agencies 55.25 Express Lanes Use
22114 Anaheim Patio&Fireside 1,400.75 Patio Furniture
Page 8 of 14 n
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9116/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22115 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 200.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22116 Appleone Employment Service 16,649.31 Temporary Employment Services
22117 Applied Industrial Technology 85.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies
22118 Arcus Data Security 161.50 OfIsite Back-Up Tape Storage
22119 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,254.00 Vacuum Truck Services
22120 Awards&Trophies By Bea 363.38 Plaques
22121 Adsorbents&Desiccants Corp, of America 214.90 Electrical Supplies
22122 AMA 1,525.00 Registration
22123 ASCE Continuing Education 445.00 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs.
22124 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 53.12 Telephone Service
22125 AT&T Wireless Service 111.73 Cellular Telephone Service
22126 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 2.491.56 Telephone Installation
22127 Battery Specialties 20.04 Batteries
22128 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobeti Crafts) 24.34 Office Supplies
22129 Boot Barn 298.24 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
22130 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1.998.52 Engineering Service 3-38-1
22131 Bristol Systems, Inc. 16,495.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
22132 Builders Book, Inc. 59.12 Publication
22133 California Chamber of Commerce 88.00 Subscription
22134 Caltrol, Inc. 877.52 Valves
22135 Canus Corporation 96.29 Fiber Optic Cable
22136 Cappo, Inc. 120.00 Registration
22137 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 530.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality
22138 Caroilo Engineers 11,044.28 Engineering Services P7-43,P250&J-34-1
22139 Century Paint 95.88 Paint Supplies
22140 City of Fountain Valley 15,484.40 Water Use
22141 Coast Automatic Transmission 1.262.80 Transmission Repair
22142 Compressor Components Of California 6,969.27 Pump Supplies
22143 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 8,185.30 Electrical Supplies
22144 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 65.64 Plumbing Supplies
22146 Converse Consultants 955.63 Consulting Services P2-65
22146 Cooper Energy Services 770.99 Engine Supplies
22147 Corporate Express Imaging 2,120.52 Misc. Computer Supplies
22148 Corporate Express 1.354.49 Office Supplies
72149 Cost Containment Solutions 322.60 Worker's Comp. Services
22150 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 17.05 Truck Parts
22151 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 139.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22162 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,245.95 Electrical Supplies
22153 Cytec Industries 12,002.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18
22154 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 2,401.30 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers
Page 9 of 14
Claims Paid From 911/99 to 9/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22155 David's Tree Service 10.715.00 Tree Removal
22156 Del Mar Analytical 2,228.00 Biosolids Analysis
22157 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 20.429.40 10 Computer Workstations
22158 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 176.65 Valves
22159 Diamond H Recognition 1.754.84 Employee Service Awards
22160 Dickson's, Inc. 9,258.00 3 Portable Air Conditioners
22161 Dovatron Manufacturing So Cal 335.00 Source Control Permit Refund
22162 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 142.24 Paint Supplies
22163 Dynalco Corp 802.00 Instrument Maint. Service
22164 Edwin M. Perkins 3,808.93 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance
22165 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 550.00 Safety Training
22166 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22167 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 23.291.72 Consulting Service-FIS Y2K&Support
22168 Environmental Resources Associates 943.70 Lab Supplies
22169 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 258.50 Maint. Service Agreement
22170 FedEx Corporation 454.99 Air Freight
22171 Filter Supply Company 27.43 Fillers
22172 Fine Science Tools, Inc. 271.01 Tools
22173 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 578.74 Lab Supplies
22174 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,016.01 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
22175 Fountain Valley Camera 60.40 Photo Supplies
22176 Fry's Electronics 993.55 Computer Supplies
22177 Ganahl Lumber Company 130.56 Lumber/Hardware
22178 Garratt-Callahan Company 1,386.74 Chemicals
22179 GTE California 6,347.88 Telephone Services
22180 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
22181 WW Grainger, Inc. 569.96 Compressor Supplies
22182 Graseby S.T.I. 813.61 Engine Supplies
22183 Graybar Electric Company 1.242.97 Electrical Supplies
22184 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.32 Janitorial Supplies
22185 Haaker Equipment Company 97.96 Truck Supplies
22186 Hach Company 511.42 Lab Supplies
22187 Hams&Company 100.00 Registration
22188 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 157.55 Catering Services
22189 Hewlett-Packard 208.92 Lab Supplies
22190 Hilti, Inc. 739.36 Tools
22191 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1,793.92 Compressor Parts
22192 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium
22193 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 2,840.17 Engineering Services 2-40
22194 Home Depot 195.31 Small Hardware
Page 10 of 14 . -
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22195 Hub Auto Supply 102.16 Truck Parts
22196 Hydrokinetics Pump&Process Equipment 671.28 Pump Supplies
22197 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 1,374.01 Lab Supplies
22198 Imaging Plus, Inc. 456.47 Office Supplies
22199 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 48.22 Lab Supplies
22200 Irvine Ranch Water District 28.10 Water Use
22201 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 3,263.30 Safety Supplies
22202 J &B Auto Parts 25.86 Auto Parts&Supplies
22203 J.D.Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration
22204 Jays Catering 568.79 Catering Services
22205 Keystone Analine Corporation 4.857.12 Chemical _
22206 Industrial Distribution Group 939.22 Tools
22207 Kris Kaligian 276.00 Contractual Services-Writing
22208 Lab Support 7.193.93 Temporary Employment Services
22209 LaserAll Corp. 233.18 Printer Service Agreement
22210 La Motte Chemical Products 29.22 Sulfide Test Kit
22211 Lexis-Nazis 357.94 Books&Publications
22212 Liebert, Cassidy&Frierson 800.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
22213 Line-X Protective Coatings 291.55 Truck Supplies
22214 Voided Check - -
22215 MarVac Electronics 49.33 Instrument Supplies
22216 MasTec Network Services 8.878.60 Communication Service
22217 Matt Chlor, Inc. 1.444.85 Valves
22218 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 60.55 Plumbing Supplies
22219 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 979.93 Boxes
22220 Medlin Controls Co. 1,771.84 Instrument Supplies
22221 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14.061.68 Mechanical Repairs
22222 Millitronics CIO RMB Engineering 69.40 Electrical Supplies
22223 Minnesota Western 219.89 Office Supplies
22224 Mission Uniform Service 3.459.51 Uniform Rentals
22225 Monitor Labs, Inc. 3,988.58 Instrument Maint.
22226 Moreland&Associates 23,737.75 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
22227 Motion Industries 308.37 Pump Supplies
22228 MotoPhoto 187.73 Photographic Services
22229 MGD Technologies, Inc. 9.565.00 4 Temporary Flow Monitors-Beach Closure
22230 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 7,051.00 Registration-Mechanical Training
22231 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11.189.81 LubricantlDiesel Fuel
22232 Ninyo&Moore 6,338.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
22233 Norms Refrigeration 173.75 Electric Parts
22234 Odor Management, Inc. 399.02 Chemical
Page 11 of 14
Claims Paid From W1199 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22235 Office Depot Business Services Div. 531.50 Office Supplies
22236 Orange County Pump Co. 120.68 Pump Supplies
22237 The Register 137.20 Subscription
22238 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 671.53 Electrical Supplies
22239 Orange Valve& Fitting Company 1,165.78 Fittings
22240 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 2.000.00 Professional Service- Bond Counsel
22241 Ortiz Fire Protection 740.00 Service Agreement
22242 Osage Systems Group 8.360.14 Computer Software
22243 Oxygen Service Company 1,037.25 Specialty Gases
22244 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 158.26 Electrical Supplies
22245 Pacific Bell 16.30 Telephone Services
22246 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
22247 Pacific Mechanical Supply 431.63 Plumbing Supplies
22248 Pagenet 1,954.49 Rental Equipment
22249 Panamehics 70.00 Battery Pack for Flow Meter
22250 Peak Technologies 1,147.62 Lab Supplies
22251 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 786.60 Filters
22252 Polydyne, Inc. 16,298.92 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22253 Praxair, Inc. 820.11 Lab Supplies
22254 Primary Source 16,337.92 Office Furniture
22255 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2,867.77 Mechanical Supplies
22256 Putzmeister 181.42 Pump Supplies
22257 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
22258 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
22259 Related Visual 419.61 Once Supplies
22260 Reliastar 20,581.94 Employee Medical Health Premium
22261 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,428.54 Life Insurance Premium
22262 Rosemount!Uniloc 675.05 Instrument Supplies
22263 Roto Rooter-S.O.C.#51 859.25 Clean&Video Tape Hunt. Beach State Concession Bldgs.
22264 Rudolph Dew&Assoc., L.L.C. 1,000.00 Career Consulting Service
22265 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 429.76 Motor Repairs
22266 RM Controls 86.73 Instrument Supplies
22267 RPM Electric Motors 1,948.D9 Electric Motor Repair
22266 RSA Sulter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials
22269 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 5,500.00 Sewer Pipe Repair
22270 Sears Industrial Sales 128.60 Mechanical Supplies
22271 Seaventures 4,650.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
22272 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 3,450.84 Professional Services-Ocean Ouffall Instrumentation
22273 Second-Sun 99.09 Light Fixtures
22274 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 4,705.88 Tools
Page 12 of 14 -
Claims Paid From 9M199 to 9119/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22275 Shepard Machinery 444.78 Tools
22276 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 105.36 Tools/Hardware
22277 Supeloo, Inc. 2,714.80 Lab Supplies
22278 So. Cal.Gas Company 15,771.60 Natural Gas
22279 Soco-Lynch Corp. 1,259.90 Janitorial Supplies
22280 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 465.30 Emission Fees
22281 Spex Cedprep, Inc. 327.39 Lab Supplies
22282 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
22283 Sun-Bell Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
22284 Sunset Industrial Parts 113.46 Mechanical Supplies
22285 Society of Environmental Toxicology&Chemistry 555.00 Registration
22286 Solar Turbines, Inc. 308.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22287 SPSS,Inc. 1,621.39 Software Upgrade
22288 The Register 1.927.80 Notices&Ads
22289 Thermo Quest 525.20 Lab Supplies
22290 Thomas Bros. Maps 15.460.00 Printing
22291 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.909.82 Mechanical Supplies
22292 Thompson Publishing Group 254.00 Publication
22293 Tony's Lock&Safe Service& Sales 65.00 Locks&Keys
22294 Tomell&Cotten 4,493.40 Legal Service-Burge
22295 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 80.00 Seminar Registration
22296 Trident Data Systems 600.00 Professional Service-Network Security
22297 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 15,559.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
22298 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 83.19 Truck Supplies
22299 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 2,420.00 Lab Services
22300 Two Wheels One Planet 342.47 Bicycle Supplies
22301 TPC Training Systems, Inc. 431.00 Training Software
22302 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 2.189.00 Equipment Certification
22303 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters
22304 U.S. Postal Service 1,400.00 Postage
22305 Ultra Scientific 93.52 Lab Supplies
22306 United Parcel Service 57.77 Parcel Services
22307 Unocal Corporation 49.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1
22308 UCI Regents 100.00 Subscription
22309 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,509.21 Plumbing Supplies
22310 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 958.90 Electrical Supplies
22311 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 5.400.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
22312 Veme's Plumbing 135.00 Plumbing Supplies
22313 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.342.90 Vision Service Premium
22314 VCI Mechanical 1,640.00 Electrical Service
Page 13 of 14
Claims Paid From 911199 to 9116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22315 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 11.022.95 Lab Supplies
22316 The Wackenhut Corporation 2.953.36 Security Guards
22317 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 950.92 Wind Sock Frame
22318 William Garrett 4,725.00 Witness Fee-Cartel
22319 Witeg Scientific 437.65 Lab Supplies
22320 Xerox Corporation 6,204.47 Copier Leases
22321 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit
22322 3CMA 295.00 Membership
22323 CNA Trust 11,979.30 Construction 5-41-1
22324 Union Bank of California 5,386.21 Construction 3-38-1
22325 Janice Debay 184.58 Meetingri mining Expense Reimb.
22326 Donald F. McIntyre 643.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22327 Orange County Sanitation District 14,986.27 Workers Comp. Reimb.
72328 Orange County Sanitation District 503.11 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,790,609.26
Payroll Disbursements
15528- 15530 Directors'Paychecks $ 1.520.04 Payroll 9/1/99
15531 -15531 Employee Paycheck 329.29 Adjustment
15532- 15662 Employee Paychecks 173,876.46 Biweekly Payroll 9/8/99
15663-15665 Employee Paychecks 2,873.06 Adjustment
41272-41707 Direct Deposit Statements 655,739.87 Biweekly Payroll 9/8199
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 834,338.72
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 149,889.98 August Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 161,339.96 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 133.056.63 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 45,539.83 Quarterly Liquidity Fee on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 489.826.40
Total Claims Paid 9/1199-9115/99 $ 7,114,774.38
Page 14 of 14
Claims Paid From 91IW99 to 2130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
22329 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $ 610.00 Legal Services-I.N.S. Fees
22330 Orange County Sanita0on District 433.196.95 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
22331 Academic Press 45.00 Publication
22332 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 1,097.05 Ceiling Tile
22333 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 130.73 Telephone Service
22334 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
22335 Cartier Corp.Training 2,600.00 Registration
22336 Court Order 681.00 Wage Garnishment
22337 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 463.19 Electrical Supplies
22338 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 181.73 Plumbing Supplies
22339 1999 CWEA S.Regional Training&Safety Conference 105.00 Registration
22340 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
22341 Employment Development Dept. 2,990.00 Reimbursable Unemployment Insurance
22342 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 11,350.80 Consulting Services-FIS Support
22343 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
22344 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
22345 GTE California 983.43 Telephone Services
22346 Graphic Design Book Club 31.90 Books
22347 Harbour Engineering Group 3,929.00 Pump Supplies
22348 Harvard Business Review 85.00 Subscription
22349 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 88.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22350 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,116.18 Dues Deduction
22351 Irvine Ranch Water District 21.36 Water Use
22362 IBM Corp. 6,233.74 Maint.Agreement-AS1400
22353 J.D. Edwards 1,630.00 Training Registration
22364 Keystone Analine Corporation 14,144.43 Chemical
22355 MarVac Electronics 46.41 Instrument Supplies
22356 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 74.44 Tools
22357 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 44.46 Plumbing Supplies
22358 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
22369 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment
22360 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 548.26 Electrical Supplies
22361 OCFA 619.08 Dues Deduction
22362 Pacific Bell 2,128.49 Telephone Services
22363 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
22364 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
22365 Peace Officers Council of CA 711.00 Dues Deduction
22366 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 2,907.11 Lab Supplies
22367 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 101.51 Freight
22368 Safety-Kleen 409.99 Service Agreement
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22369 Schneider Electric 410.46 Software Maint.Agreement
22370 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1.835.98 Tools
22371 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 247.22 Tools/Hardmm
22372 So.Cal.Gas Company 3.535.79 Natural Gas
22373 State of California 132.26 Wage Garnishment
22374 Summit Steel 469.18 Metal
22375 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
22376 Conna M.Chaudhry 115.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22377 Charles F.Winsor 589.48 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb.
22378 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 675.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
22379 AKM Consulting Engineers 46,103.75 Consulting Services 11-20
22380 Blue Cross of California 178,685.34 Medical Insurance Premium
22381 Carollo Engineers 59,344.20 Engineering Services-P1-36-2&J-254
22382 DGA Consultants, Inc. 64.150.88 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
22383 Flo-Systems, Inc. 40,916.99 Pump Supplies
22384 Foothill Engineering&Dewatering, Inc. 80,538.00 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure
22385 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 29,690.92 Belt, Filter Press Supplies
22386 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 37,965.53 Misc.Construction Services
22387 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,003.66 Medical Insurance Premium
22388 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 69,705.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
22389 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 236277.70 Engineering Services J42
22390 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 220,513.73 Lab Supplies
22391 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 112,460.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22392 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 27.906.50 Emission Fees
22393 SPEC Services, Inc. 254,895.76 Engineering Services J-33-1
22394 Tran Consulting Engineers 33.950.00 Consulting Services-Misc.Small Capital Projects
22395 Tule RanchlMagan Fans 36.146.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
22386 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 45.070.50 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
22397 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 94,325.84 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
22398 Ark Construction Company 67,245.12 Construction Pl444
22399 KPRS Construction Services,Inc. 69.750-00 Construction P2-65
22400 Southern Contracting Company 396,676.00 Construction P247-1
22401 Systems Integrated 33.112.14 Construction Services J-31-3
22402 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,080.70 Long Distance Telephone Service
22403 A-Plus Systems 825.60 Notices&Ads
22404 Aearo Company 904.00 Safety Supplies
22405 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies
22406 Airborne Express 91.75 Air Freight
22407 American Media,Inc. 536.00 Training Materials
22408 American Express CFC Remittances 6,920.16 Purchasing Card Program
22409 American Seals West 167.01 Gaskets
Page 2 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22410 American Training Resources, Inc. 1.086.72 Training Materials
22411 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 585.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
22412 Appleone Employment Service 6,361.13 Temporary Employment Services
22413 Amor Vac Sweeping Service 1,066.00 Vacuum Truck Services
22414 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 713.36 Waste Removal
22415 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 1.323.88 Audio Video Services
22416 Auto Shop Equipment Co., Inc. 6,950.00 Hoist
22417 Awards&Trophies By Bea 4526 Plaques
22418 Azur Environmental 329.74 Lab Supplies
22419 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 331.75 Telephone Service
22420 AT&T Wireless Service 3.308.80 Cellular Telephone Service
22421 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 271.05 Office Supplies
22422 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,329.22 Engineering Services 3-38-1
22423 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc. Inc. 1,056.42 Compressor
22424 Bristol Systems,Inc. 19.417.92 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
22425 Brown&Caldwell 11.115.63 Engineering Services P1-37
22426 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7.016.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
22427 BEC-Building Electronic Controls,Inc. 14,276.24 Electrical Supplies
22428 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,895.00 Pump Supplies
22429 Southern California Marine Institute 20.00 Mooring Fees-Ocean Monitoring
22430 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1.133.00 Engineering Services Pl-62
22431 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 2.778.24 Office Fumiture
22432 Charles P.Crowley Co. 338.00 Instrument Parts
22433 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 142.50 Professional Services-Ergonomic
22434 Sun International 289.52 Lab Supplies
22435 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 18.360.00 Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures
22436 Computers America, Inc. 250.67 Computer Supplies
22437 Connell GM Parts 219.01 Truck Supplies
22438 Consolidated Elect, Distributors,Inc. 18.521.93 Electrical Supplies
22439 Cooper Energy Services 5.798.06 Engine Supplies
22440 Corporate Express 254AO Office Supplies
22441 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.110.00 Custodial Services Spec.No. 9899-09
22442 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 5.63 Truck Parts
22443 Cotelligent 1,202.25 Professional Services-Computer
22444 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 2,051.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
22445 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,092.78 Communication Equipment Repair
22446 Auditor Controller Collections 17.50 Permit Fees
22447 County Wholesale Electric Co. 496.63 Electrical Supplies
22448 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
22449 Cytec Industries 16,808.58 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
22450 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 75.00 Conference Registration
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22451 CNA Consulting&Engineering 16,139.00 Professional Services-Bar Code Inventory Study
22452 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 1.753.00 Lab Supplies
22453 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals
22454 CSMFO Career Development 550.00 Registration
22455 CWEA Membership 95.00 Membership
22456 1999 CWEA S. Regional Training&Safety Conference 1,110.00 Registration
22457 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis
22458 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 6,767.78 3 Computers&5 Monitors
22459 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 336.18 Valves
22460 Dionex Corporation 1,977.31 Lab Supplies
22461 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 473.58 Paint Supplies
22462 DDB Engineering,Inc. 2,520.00 Temporary Employment Services
22463 DME,Inc. 557.19 Compressor Parts
22464 Electronic Transmission Smog System 9.90 Electrical Supplies
22465 Enchanter,Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
22466 Environmental Data Solutions Grps, L.L.0 3.840.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info. Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
22467 Environmental Express 978.75 Lab Supplies
22468 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,055.87 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
22469 Fairchild Aerial Photography Collection 75.00 Photographic Service
22470 FedEx Corporation 107.28 Air Freight
22471 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 3.703.84 Plumbing Supplies
22472 Fibertron 298.16 Fiber Optic Cable
22473 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,089.32 Lab Supplies
22474 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 9,415.39 Engineering Services P-183
22475 Fountain Valley Camera 176.59 Photo Supplies
22476 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 562.50 Truck Wash Tickets
22477 FLW, Inc. 256.45 Electrical Supplies
22478 FM International,Inc. 11,956.18 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System
22479 Ganahl Lumber Company 281.99 Lumber/Hardware
22480 Gates Fiberglass Installers 6,221.67 Fiberglass Repair
22481 GTE California 35.49 Telephone Services
22482 Genium Publishing Corp. 126.15 Publication
22483 Gerke Consulting 3.500.00 Registration
22484 Glenn Lukos&Associates 3,640.05 Engineering Service 2-41
22485 Graphic Distributors 2.144.23 Photographic Supplies
22486 Graseby S.T.I. 816.93 Engine Supplies
22487 Haaker Equipment Company 1,005.78 Truck Supplies
22488 Hach Company 66.11 Lab Supplies
22489 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples
22490 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 16.56 Plumbing Supplies
22491 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 386.00 Catering Services
Page 4 of 7 •
Claims Paid From 9/16199 to 9130199 ^
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22492 Hewlett-Packard 842.76 Lob Supplies
22493 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 21,108.70 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning
22494 Home Depot 337.07 Small Hardware
22495 Hopkins Technical Products 4,397.46 Pump Supplies
22496 City of Huntington Beach 14,614.45 Water Use
22497 Hunts'Final Phase 1,445.00 Misc.Construction Services
22498 Idexx 7,788.02 Lab Supplies
22499 Infuse Santa Ana 1,200.00 Consulting Service-SMS Implementation
22500 Interstate Battery Systems 429.55 Batteries
22501 Irvine Photo Graphics 29.09 Photographic Services
22502 IBM Corp. 56.44 Printer Service Agreement
22503 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 193.43 Safety Supplies
22504 Jays Catering 1,093.63 Catering Services
22505 Johnstone Supply 221.43 Electrical Supplies
22506 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 9,375.00 Engineering Services 2-41
22507 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 2,760.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
22508 Industrial Distribution Group 1,799.69 Toole
22509 Lab Support 11,695.66 Temporary Employment Services
22510 LaserAli Corp. 25.00 Printer Service Agreement
22511 La Motte Chemical Products 130.92 Sulfide Test Kit
22512 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 18,229.79 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
22513 Lord Fleming Architects.Inc. 1,580.00 Architectural Services
22514 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 7.500.00 Engineering Services 2-37
22515 Maintenance Products,Inc. 1,823,13 Mechanical Supplies
22616 MarVac Electronics 219.30 Instrument Supplies
22617 Massachusetts Ocean Technology Network 285.00 Workshop Registration
22518 MasTec Network Services 8,878.80 Communication Equipment-Cable
22519 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontarlo Branch 213.96 Plumbing Supplies
22620 Minank 1,481.56 Instrument Supplies
22521 Mission Uniform Service 3,358.37 Uniform Rentals
22522 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 269.27 Publications
22523 Monitor Labs,Inc. 120.71 Instrument Maint.
22524 Morton Salt 260.29 Salt
22526 National Microcemp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
22526 National Safety Council 500.00 Membership
22527 Business Training 8 Development Services 1.000.00 Seminar Registration
22528 Neal Supply Co. 20.20 Plumbing Supplies
22529 Ninyo&Moore 18,336.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
22630 Netsol/Network Solution 11,474.61 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade
22531 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,771.07 Office Supplies
22532 The Ohmart CorporatbnIVEGA Corp. 305.57 Instrument Supplies
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22533 Ortiz Fire Protection 634.00 Service Agreement
22534 Oxygen Service Company 2.433.26 Specialty Gases
22535 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 25.32 Electrical Supplies
22536 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,100.81 Plumbing Supplies
22537 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 625.48 Electrical Supplies
22538 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 185.86 Mechanical Supplies
22539 Parts Unlimited 382.35 Truck Supplies
22540 Amy Poulsen 1,012.09 Watershed Mgmt.Expert
22541 Pinnacle One 2.260.00 Registration
22542 Polydyne,Inc. 24,313.51 Canonic Polymer MO 3-11-92
22543 Projects Partners 10,80(5.78 Temporary Employment Services
22544 Pryor Resources, Inc. 3,0D0.00 Training Registration
22545 Public Officials for Water Env. Reform 335.00 Conference Registration
22546 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 79.23 Mechanical Supplies
22547 Putrmeister 130.81 Pump Supplies
22648 Ouantemi Environmental Services 950.D0 Analytical Service
22549 DOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
22550 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
22551 Related Visual 1.351.57 Office Supplies
22552 Rehastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,557.36 Life Insurance Premium
22563 Reslek Corp 796.D0 Training Registration
22654 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 336.16 Auto Repair
22555 Rutan&Tucker Atomays at Law 9,581.64 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
22556 RSA Sutter Soil Products 593.97 Soil Materials
22557 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 480.51 Mechanical Supplies
22658 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 4.669.19 Specialty Gases
22559 Second-Sun 244.55 Light Fixtures
22560 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 4.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
22561 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 19129 Plumbing Supplies
22562 Snap On Industrial 1,910.89 Hardware
22563 South Coast Water 20.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
22564 Sparkletts - 1,90823 Onnking Water/Cooler Rentals
22565 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 511.83 Janitorial Supplies
22566 Steve Casada Construction Co. 20.822.20 Construction Services-Hunt. Beach Sewer Repair
22567 Sunset Ford 342.81 Truck Supplies
22568 Super Chem Corporation 334.03 Chemicals
22569 SARBS-CWEA 320.00 Membership
22570 SCECS IS.Calif. Environmental Chemists Society) 160.00 Registration
22571 SKC-West, Inc. 889.45 Safety Supplies
22572 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 581.85 Electric Cart Parts
22573 Mag Systems 826A5 Instrument Supplies
Page 8 of 7 ..
Claims Paid From 9116199 to 9130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
22574 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,140.90 Mechanical Supplies
22575 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1.331.10 Elevator Maintenance
22576 Tony's Look&Safe Service&Sales 12.93 Locks&Keys
22677 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 538.81 Truck Supplies
22578 Teksystems 15,375.00 Temporary Employment Services
22579 Ultra Scientific 239.87 Lab Supplies
22580 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 250.00 Membership
22581 United Parcel Service 570.63 Parcel Services
22582 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,289.94 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
22583 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,993.91 Plumbing Supplies
22584 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1.353.90 Door Repair
22585 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 23,779.78 Lab Supplies
22586 Managememt Health Services, Inc. 9.460.00 On-Site Health Service
22587 Western Metro Unit 624.09 Filters
22688 Western States Chemical, Inc. 14.528.25 Causfic Soda MO 8-23-95
22589 Xerox Corporation 8,510.00 Copier Leases
22590 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 33.14 Office Supplies
22591 Zemarc Corp. 2.239.59 Pump Maint.Service
22592 Zenon Environmental Systems 4.000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit
22593 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 1.429.46 Construction 7-17
22594 Shabbir S. Bassi 330.30 Meeting/i'mining Expense Reimb.
22596 David D. Halverson 177.75 Meetingrimining Expense Reimb.
22596 Michael L. Heinz 1,284.22 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
22597 Antonin Pira 1.222.08 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb.
22598 George L.Robertson 131.60 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb.
22599 Orange County Sanitation District 987.10 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.390.54427
Pavroll Disbursements
15666-15813 Employee Paychecks $ 182.807.55 Buveekly Payroll 9/22/99
15814-15816 Employee Paychecks 2,868.14 Termination&Adjustment
41708-42147 Direct Deposit Statements 684,142.81 Biweekly Payroll 9/22/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869,816.50
Total Claims Paid 9116/99.9/30/99 $ 4,260,360.77
Page 7 of 7
DRAFT
MINUTES OF COMBINED AD HOC AND
STEERING COMMITTEES MEETING
Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 4:30 p.m.
A meeting of the combined Ad Hoc/Steering Committees of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Wednesday. September 22, 1999 at 4:30 p.m., in the
District's Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Don Hughes
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Kris Lindstrom
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Leslie Moulton
North Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Tom Dawes
Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Layne Baroldi
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Charlie McGee
Jim Silva, County Supervisor Ryal Wheeler
Directors Absent:
None STAFF PRESENT:
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Directors Present: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
John Collins, Committee Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor
Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager
Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Angie Anderson, Principal Engineering Associate
Peter Green, Director
Directors Absent:
None
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the August 25, 1999 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were
approved as drafted.
r
Minutes of the Combined Meeting of
the Ad HocJSteering Committees
Page 2
September 22, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair John Collins did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering was not present.
(7) AD HOC COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Jim Herberg reported on the District's response to comments received on the Draft
Program EIR. He reviewed the more significant comments, which pertained to level of
treatment, use of the 78-inch outfall, marine environment and public health impacts and
treatment facilities impacts.
B. Mr. Herberg and the consultants, Kris Lindstrom and Leslie Moulton, outlined the actions
that the Directors will consider at the October 27 Board Meeting regarding the
Certification of the Final Program EIR. These include: 1)Approving a resolution
certifying the EIR meets CEOA rquireements; 2)Adopt the findings; 3)Approve the
mitigation and monitoring program; 4)Adopt the Statement of overriding considerations;
and 5) Approve the preferred alternative for level of treatment. There is a 30-day period
wherein the EIR may be challenged but only by those who previously participated in the
process.
There was a discussion of changing the 50/50 primary/secondary blend and how best to
describe the impacts.
—End of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting***
(8) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF SPECIAL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
The minutes of the August 19, 1999 Special Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(9) REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair Jan Debay did not make a report.
(10) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre asked staff to report on several issues.
A. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, updated the members on the Huntington
Beach closure. The entire State Beach is posted, though samples are running clean.
Sampling has been reduced to once per day between the Santa Ana River mouth and
the Huntington Beach pier, and three times a week on either side of this stretch of
beach. A dye test will be performed on the outfall on September 30 to confirm that there
are no breaks or leaks in the near-beach section and to track the plume to confirm that it
Minutes of the Combined Meeting of
the Ad Hoc/Steering Committees
Page 3
September 22, 1999
is not reaching the shoreline. Other tests are underway. A contingency plan is being
developed on what to do with the currently diverted urban runoff from the Huntington
Beach pump stations after October 15. The siphon retrofit should be done by the end of
September.
A final report is being prepared on the investigation and activities of the past three
months. A panel of national experts will review the report to critique what was done and
provide recommendations to try to avoid this type event in the future.
Staff will be making a factual presentation on what was done at a forum on AB 411 on
October 7. Staff was asked to stay for the entire meeting. Blake Anderson will be
making a presentation to a SCAG committee on this issue.
Meetings with other agency representatives have been reduced to once a week, on
Thursdays.
All bacteria monitoring results are being posted on our websile.
Expenditures to date are $1.228 million, with $736,000 for all of the work involving the
siphon including the investigations, cleaning, bypass and capital costs.
A discussion of press coverage followed. Director Collins expressed disappointment
that some other agencies still appear to be assigning fault to the District.
B. Blake Anderson discussed a synopsis of the State Water Bond, which was recently
passed by the legislature. The governor has not yet signed it. Staff will be working with
SAWPA on a written agreement on how the projects in the Santa Ana River Plan will be
funded and to develop a plan to reallocate funds for projects that do not go forward.
Director Peer Swan asked for a matrix that outlines 1) how much money will be received
by SAWPA; 2) how much money should Orange County projects receive; and 3) how
much money is eligible in other sections of the bond and who has to approve dispersal
of those funds. The Steering and FAHR Committees will review the information before
presenting to the Board.
C. Bob Ghirelli reported that staff is evaluating two proposals for biosolids disposal. The
recommendation to proceed with negotiations will be brought to the OMTS Committee if
the due diligence proves the project(s)viable. The Kem County Board of Supervisors
are scheduled to consider a negative declaration on the biosolids ordinance on October
5 and may consider the ordinance at their October 12 meeting. General Counsel
provided written comments on the negative declaration. The Directors will be asked to
consider a legal challenge to the negative declaration in closed session at tonight's
regular Board meeting.
D. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that the Register will be
publishing an article on sewer infrastructure throughout the county, and may be
discussing the results of a District survey done with the cities in 1998.
Mrs. Tuchman also announced that eight cities have passed resolutions of support for
the GWRS project.
Minutes of the Combined Meeting of
the Ad Hoc/Steering Committees
Page 4
September 22, 1999
E. General Manager McIntyre mentioned that the City of Brea has again requested that the
District participates in a project that would sewer 17 homes in the Bexley Avenue
Neighborhood that are now on septic tanks. Because this will continue to be a problem
throughout the service area, Mr. McIntyre recommended that staff meet with County of
Orange representatives to develop a cost-sharing formula to encourage property owners
to connect to the sewer system. Several members expressed concern about the
concept and the committee did not reach a decision.
F. Blake Anderson updated the members on the timing for the distribution of the remaining
bankruptcy litigation proceeds. Because of the request for additional fees by the
litigation firth, the distribution will be delayed to mid-November. When Judge Taylor
makes his decision on the request, Judge Ryan will then move on the distribution of
funds to the claimants.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff announced that the State Supreme Court denied the Sangernano
petition for appeal.
He also indicated that there are questions on the intent of Section 6 of the recently adopted ordinance
regarding the capital facilities charge for significant industrial users. A report will be prepared for the
FAHR Committee next month that will contain recommended language for a clarifying amendment.
(12) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C)
A. Approve the policy and procedure for allowing the Board of Directors the option of
receiving their compensation and mileage reimbursement through ACH electronic
deposit into their own bank accounts (Payroll direct deposit).
Motion: Moved, seconded and approved provided the program is optional.
B. Financial Consolidation of Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and for a Single
User Fee Rate Structure.
This Rem was moved to a future meeting.
C. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to be presented to Committees in October.
There were no changes.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were no other business, communications or supplemental agenda items.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
Minutes of the Combined Meeting of
the Ad Hoc/Steering Committees
Page 5
September 22, 1999
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 27, 1999 at 5 p.m.
(17) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m.
Submitted by:
Je Tappan
St a ing Committee Secretary
Nbp.C��Vp$eYGM% D$CAN Minutia Es
a
a
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1999 -5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on October 6, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Others Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Shane Magan
James Ferryman, Vice Chair
Don Bankhead Staff Present:
John Collins, Past Board Chair
Jan Debay, Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Peter Green Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Joy Neugebauer Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Charles E. Sylvia Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Paul Walker Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist
Directors Absent: Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager
Lauri Bluestein, CAT Member
Anna Piercy Rich Schlegel, CAT Member
Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the September 1, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair Pat McGuigan announced that Agenda Item 14(a) would be an information item—formal
action would be required by the FAHR Committee.
t
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
October 6, 1999
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not in attendance.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson updated the members on the actions taken yesterday by the Kern County
Board of Supervisors on the Biosolids Ordinance. The Supervisors voted 5-0 to proceed with
the biosolids ordinance, which bans Class B biosolids in three years, imposes road fees and
provides for set-backs near schools. Tom Nixon represented OCSD at the hearing and spoke
to the need for an EIR, the serious constitutional and legal flaws of the ordinance. The
Supervisors heard a briefing by its staff regarding concerns about biosolids, which were already
addressed on several occasions over the last two years. Despite the overwhelming scientific
information that is a matter of record, the Supervisors cited the uncertainty of the science
supporting the federal regulation, their desire to be absolutely pro-active of public health and the
environment, and the evidence provided by others that biosolids are not risk free as reasons for
proceeding with the ordinance as drafted.
A challenge to the CEOA Negative Declaration and the ordinance will be filed after it is
presented to the Directors for consideration at the next Board meeting.
Imperial County is considering an ordinance that will ban all biosolids. At this time the District
does not haul biosolids to Imperial County.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The Director of General Services was not in attendance.
(9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Patrick Miles reported that the offsite testing of the FIS system went problem-free, as did the
testing of the SCADA plant automation system. Y2K testing of cen-gen will be done this month.
An 'early warning'system is being put in place to"follow the sun"and track any problems as
they occur around the globe, starting in the western Pacific. This is a state-wide effort.
(10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Bob Ooten reported that the format for the monthly report would be changing. Key data from
other departments will be included. Flows remain low, and staff is expecting another La Nina
winter based on predictions.
(11) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Bob Ghirelli updated the members on ongoing activities related to the Huntington Beach
closure. A final report on the investigation with recommendations will be prepared.
(12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
October 6, 1999
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-b)
a. OMTS99-35 Approve recommendation to donate surplus lab equipment and supplies
to the University of California, Irvine for use by Dr. Betty Olson, with an
estimated value of$5,500.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend this
item.
b. OMTS99-36 1)Authorize staff to negotiate and enter into a 10-year agreement with
The Yakima Company for the management of the District's biosolids, in
an amount to be determined prior to District's October board meeting; and
2) authorize staff to negotiate with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for the
purchase of a site for long-term management of the District's biosolids.
After a presentation by Layne Baroldi and much discussion, the OMITS
Committee members voted to approve the staff recommendation with
several changes.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that 1)
Authorize staff to negotiate and recommend to the Board a 10-year
agreement with The Yakima Company for the management of the
District's biosolids, subject to ratification by the Board, in an amount to be
determined prior to District's October board meeting; and 2) authorize
staff to negotiate with Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for the purchase of a site
for long-term management of the District's biosolids.
(14) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-c)
a. OMTS99-37 Authorize staff to waive the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge regarding
issuance of the Special Purpose Discharge permits to the City of
Huntington Beach and the County of Orange for sewering of urban runoff
for a one-year period effective November 1, 1999.
Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, explained the action that
will be presented to the FAHR Committee at its next meeting. The OMTS
Committee made an advisory motion to recommend that the FAHR
Committee approve the item.
b. OMTS99-38 Overview of Operational Research
Ed Torres, Manager of Air Quality/Special Projects Division, gave an
overview of the operational research program that is planned for the fiscal
year. He described the types of research projects that are planned for
evaluation by staff.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and approved to receive and file the
Operational Research Program report
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
October 6, 1999
C. OMTS99-39 State of the District—Employee Audit
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, and Laurie Bluestein,
Communication Action Team member, explained the results of the State
of the District Employee Audit. This was the fourth such audit and for the
first time the results were mostly positive. Director Debay suggested that
in future audits a question be included on anticipated retirement.
(15) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session
(16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
Michelle Tuchman announced that the District is sponsoring a seminar on October 20 with Peter
Sandman on managing public perception. All Directors are encouraged to attend at no cost
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(19) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
November 3, 1999 at 5 p.m.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:33 p.m.
Submitted by:
Je n Tappan
A ' g Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
H1wp.da�geMa\OMTS\19991MinNm%10E9 Minulmdw
OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To BU.of Dir.
10/6/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nu ber
oKrs993s is 1'c-I
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert Ghireili, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manager
SUBJECT: Donation of Surplus Lab Equipment and Supplies to UC Irvine, Dr. Betty
Olson
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve recommendation to donate surplus lab equipment and supplies to the
University of California, Irvine for use by Dr. Betty Olson, with an estimated value of
$5,500.
SUMMARY
The General Manager is requesting approval of a donation of surplus equipment and
supplies to Dr. Betty Olson, a professor of Environmental Microbiology at UCI. These
items were part of the now-closed Molecular Microbiology Laboratory at OCSD, and
were not disposed of during the sale of surplus equipment in 1996. They are a bench-
top refrigerated centrifuge, a spectrophotometer, and various surplus disposable
supplies. The items were purchased in 1993 through 1995 at an original price of
approximately$42,000. The current estimated resale value is $5,500.
This donation will support research that is of interest to both OCSD and UCI into
identification of E.coli of human, as opposed to animal, origin.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In 1996, several pieces of surplus laboratory instrumentation, originally purchased for
use in the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, were disposed of in a public bidding and
sale process. Two instruments were excluded from that sale: a bench-top refrigerated
centrifuge (Beckman model CS-6R, OCSD tag 10797) and an ultraviolet/visible light
\wOmVaY1M.y.Ob�aymwl0MrS1 WTAvmEa Ra�reai3aEo1
R—. Pagel
spectrophotometer(Beckman model DU 7400, OCSD tag 06915). It has since been
determined that this equipment is not useful for routine lab work at OCSD. The original
cost was, respectively, $12,000 and approximately $25,000 for a total of$37,000. This
equipment is now approximately 7 years old and has a current value estimated to be
$5,000 or less.
In addition to the equipment, several cases of various supplies used in the Molecular
Microbiology Laboratory were not sold, and are now surplus. They cannot be used for
the work currently performed by the Laboratory. The estimated purchase price of these
supplies is estimated to be $5,000, and the resale price is less than $500.
Dr. Betty Olson, a professor of Environmental Microbiology at the University of
California, Irvine, has inquired whether the District would be willing to donate the
equipment and supplies for use in her laboratory. The District informally and formally
collaborates with Dr. Olson in several areas of common research. In particular, Dr.
Olson is performing research on identification of the coliform bacterium, Escherichia soli
(E. coli), which is specific to humans. This research can potentially help differentiate E.
coli of human origin from other warm-blooded animals. One of the scientists in the
District's Laboratory, Dr. Yu-Li Tsai, performs research in this area in Dr. Olson's
laboratory on his day-off. This donation of equipment and supplies will aid in the
continuation of this research, and is in conformance with both state law and District
policy.
ALTERNATIVES
Declare the equipment and supplies surplus and sell them at public auction.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not Applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
None.
\MUanWemlNq N1apmEeICMISIPdN.penJu PePoa PeOMi59d-M d.1
Pence! aa�Po Page 2
OMTS COMMITTEE WeungMe TOW.ofN
10/6/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Numter Ite N b
oMM99-36 is tit)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services
Originator: Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist
SUBJECT: BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS: YAKIMA COMPOSTING
FACILITY, TULE RANCH/MAGAN RANCH
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Authorize staff to negotiate and enter into a 10-year agreement with The Yakima
Company for the management of the District's biosolids, in an amount to be determined
prior to District's October board meeting. and 2) authorize staff to negotiate with Tule
Ranch/Magan Ranch for the purchase of a site for long-term management of the
District's biosolids.
SUMMARY
At the September 1,1999 OMITS Committee meeting, staff reported that the due diligence efforts
on Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch resulted in a recommendation not to pursue the 4,026 acre Kem
County portion of the property and to continue evaluating the 1,808 acres located in Kings
County.
On September 16, 1999, staff received an unsolicited offer from the Yakima Company to
manage the District's biosolids at a proposed compost facility in western Kem County. The
proposed facility will be designed to receive, store, and compost up to 600,000 tons per year of
organic feed stocks, including up to 360,000 tons per year of biosolids. Approximately 260,000
tons per year of the biosolids capacity remains available. The Yakima Company has
commitments from the owners of 29,000 acres of farmland in the area to use the finished
product.
Staff is presently evaluating these proposals and will present a verbal report at the October 6,
1999 OMTS Committee meeting.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
rv,m.mu,w mwamnwrs,ww+wa.wwdnaeenae*�wieed
n.u..e naaoe Pagel
ALTERNATIVES
Continue to rely on District's contractors for the land application of biosolids, and issue a
Request for Proposal for alternate biosolids management options.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A.
ATTACHMENTS
hadonWalai\wp.do\agenda\OMM1999 genda Repads\October\OMTSW36.dot
\Y✓ImWM1IMp AaVpMYCMISIG6U/.peMM.Pepr6KMc4MMlNPN MI
e...aa arm9e Page 2
09/27/1999 12:12 925-263-7458 W TERTEOn PARTNERS PAGE el
u
The Yakima Company 800-375-8343
r o H=1164 425-712-0985
Fdm= t con 96020-1164 FAX 425-712-8257
September 27, 1999
Layne T.Bacoldi
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 9270284018
Sl1BI: LHrM OFI rmW FOR EQ BIosom)S MANAGEbeNT SIRVKES CON1RACr BASED ON
NEW BioscLw9 Com,osEENG FAaLiry ON 320-ACRE StM mr WmERN KERN COUNTY
Dear Layne:
As you are:aware,The Yakima Company has recently filed a Notice of latcut(NOI)with the Kern
County Plaaniug Department for obtaining a General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for
building and operating a Biosolids Storage/Composting Facility(the"Facility)on a 320-acre site east
of the Buttonwillow Iand and Cattle Company(BLACCO) firm. Aspruposcd,the Facility will be
permitted and designed to receive, store and compost up to 500,000 tons per year of organic feed
stocks,including up to 360,000 wet tons per year(wt/y) of municipal wastewater treatment biosolids.
Project Stains& Ural Support .
The attached 13-page Project Overview describes the Facility in more detail This document was
submitted to the Kern County Planning Department along with theNOI forms prepared for us by Fred
Porter at Porter Robertson/Civil Engneers in Bakersfield. We have also provided a copy of this
document to each of the five members of the Board of Supervisors inKum County. A"Project
Application Review Committee"meeting was held on August 24, 1999. The initial reviews of our
proposal by county staff at the PARC meeting and subsequintly by the Rem County Solid Waste
Management Committee on September 10,.1999,were very favorable and supportive of our project.
We have explained to the county staff and to the Supervisors that the purpose of our project is to
support existing levels of biosofids beneficial use land application operations on nonfood cropland in
the county; and that this project is not intended to increase the quantity of biosolids coming into the
county. As evidence of the local interest and support for our project, we have received product use
commitments for 350,000 tons per year of compost from the 12,000 acre BLACCO farm and the
27,000 acre Twisselman Snake Ranch farm. These farms,which predominately grow,cotton and grain
for animal feed, are located within 25 miles of the pmjca site.
Indeed, a key advantage of our project is Yakima's dose association with BLACCO and the Tracy
family. The Tracys are fifih generation farmers in Kern County. Yakima pioneered the use of
biosolids in Kem County by conducting a successful"crop improvement research project"in
cooperation with Cal Poly San Luis Obispo University on marginal farmland on the BLACCO farm in
1994. This project led to the initiationof a 60,000 wr/year Class direct land application project on
9,400 permitted acrcv of nonfood cropland on the BLACCO farm in 1995. Over the last five years,
Yakima has land applied over 250,000 wt of biosolids on the BLACCO farm without any incidents,
09/27/1999 12:12 925-283-7458 UATERTEOI PARTNER" PAGE 82 '
Layne T.Bmoldi
WM2
September 27, 1999
complaints, or public controversies. The Tracys have been and remain strong supporters of biosolids
beneficial use on nonfood cropland in Kern County.
To obtain further local support for the permitting and construction its Biosolids Storag*Composting
Facility, Yakima has obtained.green waste supply commitments from several local cities, including
Taft, Shafter, Wasco and Delano. These cities are glad to have a place where they can take their green
wastes and receive landfill diversion credits under AB 939. These cities have indicated that they will
write letters of aupport for our projecL Yakima is currently negotiating with the Kern County Solid
Waste Authority to receive construction and demolition wood waste and green waste from the county
landfill in addition to green waste from the City of Bakersfield's landfill.
Another advantageous feature of Yakima's Facility is its location between a new large dairy and the
City of Sha ier's recently expanded North of the River wastewater treatment plant. This location was
chosen among several alternative sites to ensure that our&cWty was compatible with adjacent land
uses, and visa versa. To promote good relations with the neighboring wastewater treatment plant,we
have offered,and the plant has accepted, a proposal by which we will take the plain's bicsolids, and
the plant will take any excess site runoffwater that we generate.
Timing and Schedule
Yakima has moved ahead with the land acquisition,preliminary design, and submittal of a NOI for this
project at this time boom=the new State Water Rcsources Control Board General Order for Biosolids
will likely talc;effect within the nets 12 months. As you know,this new General Order will
effectively prohibit winter time field operations in Kem County. Thus. Yakima and all other biosofids
contractors operating in Kern County will be required to divert all arriving biosolids in winter months
to a permitted biosolids storage and/or composting facility. This project is intended to provide
Yakima that capability. Moreover,ifthe eurent proposed Biosolids Ordinance in Kem County is
enacted in early 2000 as now expected, Class B land application will be prohibited in the county after
December 31, 2002. However,EQ compost is exempted from this ordinance. Thus, the only way
Yakima will be able to oominue to operate on the BLACCO farm and to supply organic soil
amendments to the Twiss 1p man farm after December 31,2000, will be by composting Class B
biosolids into EQ product
Since it will take Yakima at least six months for permitting(mcluding.affrcmation by the California
Integrated Waste Management Board ofKem Couirty's issuance of a solid waste facilities permit)and
she months for construction, we must move ahead now to have an operational facility by November
2000. Our plan is to follow the permitting precedents set by San Joaquin Composting—including the
approval San Joaquin recently obtained from the CIWMB for wintertime storage of Class B biosolids.
Proposed Contmet Terms
We are currently soliciting customers for this new Biosolids Stomge(Compostiog Facility and hereby
offer the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)the opportunity to enter into an EQ BiosoLms
MANAGnu.Nl'SEIMCES AGREEMErri (the"Agreement")with The Yakima Company. The purpose
of the Letter of Intent is to set out the basic terms for such an agreement The mutually accepted basic
terms are as follows:
1. Upon execution of the Agreement, OCSD may supply Yaldma with 100 wt/day of biosolids which
Yakima will land apply as Class Bon Yakima's e3dsting permitted Class B sites in Kern County.
' 09/27/1999 12:12 925-283-7458 WATEIMCH PARTNERS PAGE 83
d Jayne T,Baoldi
page 3
SWWMb t27,1999
OCSD will pay Yakima$25.00/wt for providing such service. In addition, OCSD will directly pay
(or reimburse Yakima for)all fees and charges imposed by Kern County on Class B land
application.
2. Yakima will reserve 125,000 wt(y of biosolids storage/composting capacity for OCSD's exclusive
use for a period often(10)years, commencing upon startup of the Facility.
3. After execution of the Agreement and upon receipt by Yakima of all required permits, approvals
and authorization for constructing and operating the Facility, OCSD will pay Yakima$1,560,000
million in cash as prepayment of RRZMVED CAPACITY CoDeM61ENf FEES for the fast 10 years
of operation of the Facility. In consideration of advancing these funds to Yakima, Yakima will
issue OCSD a credit of $1"65/wt for all OCSD biosolids received at the Facility for a period of
ten(10)years,commencing upon startup ofthc Facility.' .
4. In consideration of prepaying the RESERVED CAPACZrY CombmthEWT FEES w specified above,
Yakima will grant OCSD alien on the real property comprising the Facility(i.a.,the land
improvements,and buildings)on a co-equal basis with any other creditors. Furthermore, should
Yakima wish to sell tho Facility to an unaffiliated entity during tbo term of the Agreement. Yakima
will first give OCSD the opportunity to acquire tho Facility. This"first purchase option"right shall
remain m effect for a ninety(90)day period following written notification by Yakima to OCCSD
of the proposed sale of the Faeflity and disclosure of all pertinent terms. If OCSD fails to exorcise
its purchase option in the ninety(90)day period,the option shell expire and Yakima shall be free to
sell the Facility.
5. Upon completion and startup the Facility. OCSD shall supply, Yakima will accept and compost
into EQ pmduM a Minimum of 10,500 wt/menth of iltwatered(200%no 35%solids)OCSD Class
B biosolids. For all quantities of Class B biosolids tbat Yakima accepts and compost into EQ
product,Yakima will charge OCSD a BASE COMFOSMGFEE of. $27 40/wt. (NOTE:Wiith the
$1.65/wt"edit that OCSD will receive over the last tar(10)years of upamation of the Facility,
OCCSD net price for EQ service will be: 5.75
6. In addition to Class B biosolids, OCSD may supply Yakima with dewatered(209/a to 350/9)EQ
biosolids as all or pet of the Minimum of 10,500 wt/momh of biosolids that OCSD is required to
supply Yakima Yakima will directly land apply my Class A biosolids supplied by OCSD on
nonfood cropland on the BLACCO(or adjacent farms used by Yakima)in accordance witb all
local, state and federal rules and regulation governing such operations, including temporarily
storing the material at the Facility during periods ofwat weather. For all quantities of Class A
biosolids that Yakima accepts and directly land applies,Yakima will charge OCSD a BASE LAND
A"LICAnoNFIrEOP.
7. The BASE CowosmGVEE and the BAuE LAND ArrI.twiciNYEE will be subject to
adjustment as follows; .
IL Yakima will peas on to its customers all fees and assessments,if any, imposed by Kern
county or any other governmental agency under Yakima's Conditional Use Permit and
Solid Waste Facilities Permit for the Facility on prorated basis,and
b. The BASE PROCUSSING FEE will be subject to anmal adjustment for general cost
increases based on a mutually acceptable formula tied to a government index.
09/27/1999 12:12 925-283-7450 WATERTE6i PARTNERS PAGE 84 11'
Iayae T,Bmoldi - V
Page 4
scptvaecr27. 1999
S. In addition to the Minimum of 10,500 wt/mouth of biosolids that OCSD is obligated to supply
Yakima,OCSD shall supply Yakima all quantities of OCSD biosolids that are diverted for any
reason from all direct land application,operations that OCSD(m contractors engaged by OCSD)
conducts in Kern County and King County during the term of Yaldma's Agreement with OCSD.
9. Yakima shag issue a credit to OCSD in the amount of all revenues received by Yakima from the
sales ofEQ product,less transportation and other direct costs(e.g., laboratory analyses) incurred
by Yakima in connection with such sales: -
10.Yakima will acquire the project site and will design, build, own,and operate the biosolids
storagrJeompost facility as generally described in the Project Overwew at its cost
11.Under all service options set forth in the Agreement,Yakima will provide, at its cost, all labor,
materials(including bulking agents), egmpm=% supervision, management,and capital necessary
Sor. (i)transporting OCSD's biosolids from the Fountain Valley and/or the Huntington Beach
treatment plants to the Facility site or the direct land application sites in Kern County;(ii)storing
and composting the biosolids into EQ product(iii)spreading, incorporating, distributing or giving
away the biosolids or EQ product
ro duct to end-users;and(rv).complying with act rules,regulations, and
permit ralterMems goveimn g such operations.
12. Yakima will keep the Facility site and equipment that Yakima uses in all facets of its operations in
good working order and appearance in according with industry practices.
13. Yakima will bear and pay'all taxes,fees and assessments(other than those identified in Paragraph
7.a above)that are assessed on its real property, equipment,operations, and profits.
14.Yakima reserves the right to contract with other agencies and to use and operate the Facility and
Yakima's land application activities as Yakima so chooses,so,long as Yakima maintains the ability
to take and process up to 125,000 wt/y of OCSD biosolids.
15.All biosolids supplied by OCSD shall meet the Table 3 metal limits and the Class B pathogen
requirements set forth in the 40 CFR 503 regulations.
16. Yakima will comply with all customary insurance,bonding,reporting,record keeping, inspection, ,
site visit,training, and loading procedures generally applicable to OCSD's biosolids contractors.
17. The Agreement shall become effective upon execution by Yakima'and OCSD. Upon execution of
the Agreement,Yakima shall provide OCSD with Class B direct land application service in
accordance with price and terms set forth in Paragraph t above. The Agreement shall be and
remain in effect for an initial term of ten(10)years beginning upon completion and startup of the
Facility. Upon completion and startup ofthe Facility,Yakima shall provide OCSD with EQ
service in accordance with price and terms set forth in Paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 above. The
initial term shall be followed by two(2)five-year renewal terms, which may be exercised by
mutual agreement of the parties.
if OCSD staff accepts these basic terms and wishes to recommend and present them the OCSD Board
of Directors as the basis for receiving authority for staff to negotiate and conclude a new EQ
BiosOLIDsMANACF-NlEm SERvims AccatloiawNr with Yakinik please sign below and return a
signed copy of thus Latter of Intent to Yakima by October t.: 19".
09/27/1999 12:12 925-283-7450 WATEMEO7 PARTNERS PAGE 05
I LayinT Baroldi -
page 5
Septaeber 27, 1999
if Yalu=does trot receive a signed copy ojlhis Letter or baent by,staff by October 1, 1999, this offer
shall expire, and it wi11 no longer be tro Iable jot accepaiiwe by OCSD.
We understand that, once signed, this Letter of Intent will be.presented first to the Technical Services
Committee of the OCSD Board of Directors. If approved by the Technical Services Committee, this
Letter of Intent will then be presented to the fldl Board of Directors for its approval and authorization
for staff to prepare:and enter into a contract with Yakima We understand these further approvals will
be sought in October 1999. Therefor, once signed by staff,this Letter of Intent will expire unless
OCSD Board of Directors' approval is obtained on or before Qctober 31, 1999 to enter an EQ
IROSOIAIs MANAGENffivr SERVICES ACRMff.Nr with Yakima on the terms set out herein
If Board approval is obtained on or before October 31, 1999,-the parties will proceed immediately to
negotiate the definitive terms of the EQ BmsoLros MANACE6vwr Smvlct9 AGREEMENT based on
the term set forth in this letter.
Both parties understand, agree, and acknowledge that this Letter of Intent is non-binding and shall
have no legal effect on either patty. Neither party shall be liable for any direct, indirect,
consequential, incidental or special damages,howsoever occurring. Furthermore, each part shall
bear, pay and be responsible for its cost for proceeding with the negotiation of the EQ B10SOLMS
MANAGEbmvT SERVICiez AGRMKE T without recourse to or re®bursement by the other party.
We look forward to working with you in concluding the EQ 0I0SOI.ID6 MANACENWiT SERVICES
AGREEMENT and becoming OCSD's principal biosolids maoagcmcat services contractor.
Sincerely,
Jim Willett
Owner and Presider
Accepted by QCSD Staff
for Ft mm®datioa and Presentation to
The Board of Directors of
The Orange County Sanitation District
By:
Its:
Date.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, October 7, 1999, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation
District was held on Thursday, October 7, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Steve Anderson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
John Collins, Past Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Jack Mauller Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
Russell Patterson Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer
Christina Shea Moms Ying, Project Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Jim Mullins, Project Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Laurie Bluestein, Communication Action Team
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Directors Absent:
OTHERS PRESENT:
None
Bob Finn, Brown &Caldwell
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the September 2, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
PDC Committee Minutes '
Page 2
October 7, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present at the meeting.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson updated the members on the actions taken yesterday by the Kem County Board
of Supervisors on the Biosolids Ordinance. The Supervisors voted 5-0 to proceed with the
biosolids ordinance, which bans Class B biosolids in three years, imposes road fees and
provides for set-backs near schools. Tom Nixon represented OCSD at the hearing and spoke to
the need for an EIR, and the serious constitutional and legal flaws of the ordinance. The
Supervisors heard a briefing by its staff regarding concerns about biosolids, which were already
addressed on several occasions over the last two years. Despite the overwhelming scientific
information that is a matter of record, the Supervisors cited the uncertainty of the science
supporting the federal regulation, their desire to be absolutely pro-active of public health and the
environment, and the evidence provided by others that biosolids are not risk free as reasons for
proceeding with the ordinance as drafted.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Director of Engineering David Ludwin asked Jim Herberg to report on the status of the Strategic Plan
Final EIR and the Groundwater Replenishment System project. The final EIR package is being
mailed this week, and copies of the responses, mitigation measures, and overriding considerations
that will be presented to the Board at the October 27 regular meeting are also included in the
package. Mr. Herberg also updated the Committee members on the GWRS project activities during
the past month.
Mr. Ludwin reported that material containing asbestos was found in the old Board Room ceiling during
the seismic retrofit of the Administration Building and it was removed during the October 2-3
weekend. Air monitoring was done throughout the building, which indicated no airborne asbestos
fibers. A change order will be coming for this additional work.
The Coast Trunk siphon repair work is nearing completion. Site restoration work is remaining.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present at the meeting.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information item. The Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the report of Construction
Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%were reviewed.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
October 7, 1999
(11) QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSAs AND ADDENDA
Information item. The Quarterly PSAs and Addenda Report was reviewed.
(12) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY
Information item. There were no comments on this report.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-1)
a. PDC 99-35 Adopt Resolution No. 99-XX, Establishing Policies and Procedures
for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public
Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services
Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement said Policies
and Procedures; and Repeal Resolution Nos. OCSD 98.8, OCSD
98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98-43.
The Committee reviewed the Bow charts that were prepared to
show how a project moves through the approval process with
anticipated project time and manhour savings with the proposed
Delegation of Authority changes. The Directors asked that the
approval of addenda to small project task orders be assigned to
the General Manager.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this item. Director Swan opposed the motion.
b. PDC 99-45 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with
the Orange County Flood Control District for construction costs
associated with the relocation of the sewer line for East Garden
Grove Wintersburg Channel Improvement, Contract No. 11-17-2,
for an additional amount of$200,481.22, increasing the total
amount not to exceed $325,481.22.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this item.
c. PDC 99-46 1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 6-12, with Mike Prlich & Sons, authorizing an addition of
$96,969, increasing the total contract amount to$2,489,765; 2)
Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No.
6-12, with Mike Prlich & Sons, authorizing a deduction of$99,750,
decreasing the total contract amount to $2,390,015; and 3)Accept
Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No.6-12, as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final
Closeout Agreement.
h
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 4
October 7, 1999
Director Collins pointed out that five of the change order items
were a result of utilities not shown on the plans. He asked staff to
try to ensure that the designer does a better job of researching
these lines.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this item.
d. PDC 99.47 1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,107,320 for Goldenwest
Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, for a total
project budget of$5,027,720;2)Approve a budget amendment of
$256,852 for Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for a
total project budget of$4,329,752; 3)Approve plans and
specifications for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement,
Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No.
11-20; 4)Approve Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and
specifications; 5) Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation; and 6)Award contract to Ken Thompson, Inc.,
for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract
No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, for
an amount not to exceed $6,325.000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this item.
e. PDC 99-48 Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
with SPEC Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability
Improvements to Treatment Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1I,
providing for additional engineering services for an additional
amount of$229,187, increasing the total contract amount not to
exceed $2,350,935.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this item.
f. PDC 99-49 Approve a budget amendment of$6,069,661 to Area Classification
Studies Implementation Plan, Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35,
for a revised total project cost of$7,214,661.
Jon Thomsic made a presentation on the Hazardous Area
Classification Study and Implementation Plan to bring the
treatment plants into compliance with NFPA 820. The study
recommended five projects for implementation, two of which staff
has determined should be implemented immediately. The other
three projects will be included in future budget cycles. The
Committee members expressed concern about the safety of the
workers until all of the work is done. Director Swan suggested that
staff contact the District's insurance carrier to review the report to
see if implementing these changes would result in reduced
premiums.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
October 7, 1999
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval of this Item.
(14) INFORMATION ITEMS
a. PDC 99-50 State-of-the-District Employee Audit
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, and Laurie
Bluestein, Communication Action Team member, explained the
results of the State of the District Employee Audit. This was the
fourth such audit and for the first time the results were mostly
positive.
b. OUTS 99-37 Authorize staff to waive the Capital Facilities Charge regarding
issuance of the Special Purpose Discharge permits to the City of
Huntington Beach and the County of Orange for sewering of urban
runoff, for a one-year period effective November 1, 1999.
Bob Ghirelli reported on the forum held by Assemblyman Baugh in
Huntington Beach on AS 411, which was effective in July and
provided for new testing protocols for testing beach water quality.
Further clarification has been requested from the State. There was
also some discussion on the District's move from 50150 discharge.
The investigation into the Huntington Beach closure is being closed
out. The District's sewer system, treatment plants and outfall have
been cleared as possible sources. The final report is being
prepared, which will include costs, potential for reimbursement and
next steps. The District is now taking a supporting role, with the
Flood Control District and the cities taking the lead.
The action to waive the Capital Facilities Connection Charge and to
issue a Special Purpose Discharge Permit to the City of Huntington
Beach and the County of Orange for a one-year period will be
presented to the Board at its next meeting. Director Lynn Daucher
stated that Huntington Beach and the County should prove that
they are performing due diligence in reducing flow, and that after
the one-year period, the issue should be revisited. The Strategic
Plan should also be reviewed to evaluate the impact of the
additional flow. An interagency group will be formed to consider all
the issues of dry weather urban storm drain flows.
(15) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
PDC Committee Minutes '
Page 6
October 7, 1999
(16) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
(19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
November 4, at 5 p.m.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
C Committee tecletary
Htwp.tll genda�DCTDC99\ MIN5\IW799minWe dx
PDC COMMITTEE W6,n7gr Tosd.ofDir.
307/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT 1a Numbv 1l mNumb
rDe99-N /3 Ce
Orange County Sanitation Dlstrietr
FROM: David Lu J11rector of Engineering
Originator: Bud Palmquist, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER REPLACEMENT AT
WINTERSBURG CHANNEL, CONTRACT NO. 11-17-2
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Orange County
Flood Control District for construction costs associated with the relocation of the sewer
line for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Improvement, Contract No. 11-17-2,
for an additional amount of$200,481.22, increasing the total amount not to exceed
$325,481.22.
SUMMARY
The Orange County Flood Control District ("District") and the Orange County Sanitation
District ("Sanitation District") entered into a Reimbursement Agreement on September
16, 1997, for Revenue Area No. 11. The Reimbursement Agreement is to pay the
Orange County Flood Control District for the construction of a new 39-inch sewer pipe
under the improvements to the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel in Goldenwest
Street, including administration, inspection, and other associated costs. An existing
15-inch sewer had to be relocated and maintained in service during construction of the
new 39-inch line. Addendum No. 1 for$200,481.22 is for five items of additional
change order work, plus 15 percent of total construction costs for administration and
inspection ($42,454.07), and an adjustment due to the bid amount of$250,000 versus
the original engineer's estimate of$125,000. The original Engineer's Estimate was
based on a standard opencut installation. The actual bid and installation was based on
hand digging through the existing piling for the street bridge and included a complicated
bypass system which had to be installed to allow for the construction of the new 39-inch
sewer line.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Amendment No. 1 is to add $200,481.22 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the
Orange County Flood Control District for a total agreement amount of$325,481.22.
G Wgla W M andx Den Rep ftVM11A712 AR.dO
RMsed: � Page 1
Summary of Reimbursement Amounts
Initial Agreement $125,000.00
Amendment No. 1 $200,481.22
Total Agreement Amount $325,481.22
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (1998-1999 Budget, Zone 11, Line b)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives. The work has been completed and Addendum No. 1 reflects
the final accounting for Agreement No. D97-022.
CEOA FINDINGS
The Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was
filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Final Accounting for Agreement No. D97-022
BP:Ic
c ln19loW Wanda Draft R.p ftwMl14L]AR dot
Rm x Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Relocation of 15-Inch Trunk Sewerline at East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Improvement
Contract No. 11-17-2
� 1 qC{ L 3
„� M ym ORIGJNAI,a' kCURkENT PROPOSED fiPROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
iP 'E MASK.1' �UJkIOR12ED PROJECT° BUDGETS' REVISED AUTHORIZED .AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
5"��+BUDGET' BUOOET- INCRF-AS,�.° BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Y tt
Project Development $ 2,000 It 2,000 $ 808 $ 2,808 $ 2.808 $ 2.808 $ 2,808 100%
Design Staff 1 $ 45.300 $ 45,300 1 $ (6,000) $ 39,300 1 $ 50.000 $ (10,700) $ 39,300 $ 9,205 230/6
Consultant PSA $ 19.700 $ 19,700 $ 19.700 $ 19.700 $ 19,700 $ 15,200 77%
Construction Contract $ 376,000 $ 376,000 It (50,518) $ 325,482 $ 125.000 $ 200,482 $ 325.482 $ 125,235 38%
Construction(Other) $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 41000) $ $
Construction Staff $ 25,000 $ 25,000 .;: $ 25,000 It 25.000 $ 17,358 69%
Contingency $ 44,700 $ 44,700 $ 34.700) $ 10,000 i' $ 10,000 It 10,000 0%
TOTAL $ 491.700 $ 491.700 $ (69.410) It 422.290 $ 19d,700 $ 227.590 $ 422,290 $ 169.804 40%
h k\ dtawngvome9 deet lehle
F.R moj 1N17M
P pv by Je Tu
PFRD Acm Nn S.nkas
M"14,ION
Final Accounting - Agreement D97-022
Agreement D97-022 executed on September 16, 1997. is by and between the Orange County Flood Control District
and the Orange County Sanitation District No. 11. Agreement D97-022 called for the relocation of Sanitation
District's 15'trunk sewer line as part of the East Garden Grove Wntersburg Channel Improvement
from 411 meters downstream of Goldenwest Street to 349 meters upstream of Goldenwest Street-Contract
Agreement No. D98-063.
Deposit per Agreement D97-022
Invoice#189914 dated 0323198 $ 125,000.00
D.O. 72839 dated 07/03/98
Actual Costs Per Progress Report No.12
Bid Item 025 Relocate Sewerline $ 256,000.00
Contract Change Order No. 1:
1. Increase sewer pipe diameter from 36"to 39" $ 3,311.44
2. Lower sewer line below the flow line elevations 1,000.00
3. Increase manhole size of four manholes from 72"to 84" 13,288.00
4. Replace damaged 15"sewer VCP line at manhole 11.518.18
5. Modify approved traffic control plans for sewer work 3,909.53
Subtotal $ 33.027.15
TOTAL $ 283,027.15
Summary
Deposit $ 125,000.00
Less:Actual Costs 283,027.15
Less: 15%of Total Costs for Administration and Inspection 42,454.07
Amount Due to County $(200,01.22)
i�ltus�a rtoudtllvas
zb :a tiny cE us c�a
PDC COMMITTEE Necbng Drt ra edaf Mr.
!o-7-gg !o-n-gg
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number R N(
Px qR-y
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-12
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, with Mike
Prlich & Sons, authorizing an addition of$96,969, increasing the total contract amount
to $2,489,765; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 6-12, with Mike Prlich & Sons, authorizing a deduction of$99,750, decreasing the
total contract amount to $2,390,015; and (3) Accept Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 6-12, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving
the Final Closeout Agreement.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 2 includes six items of added work to Contract No. 6-12. Change
Order No. 3 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities to Contract No. 6-12. There are
five changed conditions associated with these change orders. There is no time
extension associated with these change orders. Liquidated damages on this contract
are $1,000.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
Contract Start Date August 25, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date September 29, 1999
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3
Current Contract Completion Date October 9, 1999
Actual Completion Date July 2, 1999
Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $2,277,796.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 115,000.00
This Change (CO No. 2, Add) $ 96,969.00
This Change (CO No. 3, Deduct) $ (99,750.00)
Change Orders To Date $ 112,219.00
Percentage Increase To Date 4.93 %
Final Contract Price $ 2,390,015.00
The addition for Change Order No. 2 and the deduction for Change Order No. 3
combine to a net deduction of$(2,781). This deduction reduces the current
Construction Contract amount from $2,392,796 to the final Contract price of$2,390,015.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 6 Item c)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contract No. 6-12, Fairview Relief Sewer, includes the installation of 7,714 feet of sewer
pipe and associated manholes in the City of Costa Mesa. Boyle Engineering
Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to
Mike Prlich & Sons on June 24, 1998. The contract is 100% complete.
The following summarizes Change Order No. 2:
Item Description r$44,488
Days Type
No.
1 Change from Jacking to Open-Cut 0 Other
and Manhole Elimination
2 Repair of Exisitin Sewer 0 Chan ed Condition
3 Replacement of Manhole Drop 0 Changed Condition
Connection
4 Installation of Additional Lateral 0 Changed Condition
Pi e
5 Removal of Steel Vent Pipes $1,3491 0 1 Changed Condition
6 Additional Work due to Caliche $18,395 0 Changed Condition
Soil
Total —Change Order No. 2 $96,9691 0
Item No. 1 reflects a Contractor requested change in construction method from jacking
to open-cutting. This change eliminated the need for a new manhole. The original
costs per the Schedule of Prices for jacking and manhole construction were $66,000.
The adjusted costs for open-cutting and the eliminated manhole are $51,350. These
costs combine to a net credit of$(14,650) for the District.
c N,plod @nda DIad Rep ftV UR o-n cot,coa COA.M dz
R..,a.d 1 a 1 Page 2
The following summarizes Change Order No. 3:
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Adjustment of Engineer's $(99,750) 0 Other
Quantities
Total—Change Order No. 3 1 $ 99,750 0
This item adjusts the contract bid items to the actual quantities incorporated into the
work. See attached Change Order No. 3 for more information.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA requirements have been met for the Fairview Relief Sewer under Notice of
Determination filed on July 20, 1998.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order No. 2
4. Change Order No. 3
MB:Ic
o:x,�mmnre.oa.u.nnepemw¢uas,zcm,cw,con oaw.ax
A 1 � Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 6-12
!! r 4✓, Oj11GINAL ;'2 CURRENT PROPDSED� PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED '. ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROAECTRASK AUTH15RIZED ' FROACT '-BUDGET" REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION.. TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET- INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE. TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 17,000 $ 17.000 8 17,000 - $ 17,000 $ 17.000 $ 4.796 28%
Design Staff I It 9.120 $ 174,450 It 174,450 1 $ 174,450 1 $ 174,450 $ 36,502 21%
Consultant PSA $ 69.880 $ 117,229 $ 117,229 $ 117,229 $ - $ 117,229 $ 52.207 45%
L
tract $ 2,209,000 $ 2,392,796 $ (2,781) $ 2,390,015 $ 2,392,796 $ (2,781) $ 2,390,015 $ 2.298,358 96%
her)' $ - $ $ $ - $ 277,111 100%
ff $ 72,000 $ 390.737 $ - $ 390.737 $ 390,737 $ - $ 390,737 $ 258,994$ 285.300 $ 502.688 $ 2.781 $ 505,469 $$ 2.662.300 $ 3.594,900 $ - $ 3,594,900 $ 3,092,212 $ (2,781) $ 3.089.431 $ 2.927,968 95%
$277,111 charge is for phase 1 of the Fairview Relief Sewer(33"VCP from Baker to Paularino Channel).
It was bid and constructed with 14-1-1A(Baker-Gisler Interceptor), but charged to this job.
C0812-02,CO 243 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Fm RevisMi V99
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 6-12
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 6/24/98 $ 2,277,796.00 $ 2,277,796.00 400 400
CO NO. 1 6123/99 $ 115,000.00 $ 2,392,796.00 5.05% 10 410
CO NO. 2 Pending $ 96,969.00 S 2,489,765.00 9.31% 0 410
CO NO. 3 Pending $ (99,750.00) $ 2,390,015.00 4.93% 0 410
H:hvp.dt@WgUobs and Contracts\64=haige Order No.1\C01 Chrgstatrepat
Page 1 of 4 W
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor Mike Prlich &Sons C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: August 30, 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Corporation
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (8eduet) $96,969.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —CHANGE FROM JACKING TO OPEN-CUT AND MANHOLE ELIMINATION
This Rem is for a change of construction method from jacking to open-cutting with the elimination of a
manhole. Open-cutting reduced the traffic impact and expedited the project. The manhole at Station
59+95 became unnecessary due to a sewer-anglepoint elimination with open-cutting. The costs for
this item are total costs to install the sewer between Stations 58+90 and 59+80. However, the costs
are offset in Change Order No. 3 by reducing the originally scheduled quantities for sewer jacking and
manhole construction. The net credit for this change amounts to $14,650. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 612-3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $51,350.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—REPAIR OF EXISTING SEWER
This item is for a bypass installation and the repair of an existing 18-inch sewer at Station 52+85. The
Contractor had damaged the existing sewer, which was shown incorrectly on the drawings. The work
consisted of a bypass installation to contain the sewage, and repair work. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 612-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,934.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3—REPLACEMENT OF MANHOLE DROP CONNECTION
This Rem is for the removal and replacement of an undisclosed manhole drop connection. During
replacement work of an existing manhole located in the intersection Fairview Road/Princeton Drive the
Contractor discovered a drop connection not shown on the contract drawings. The work consisted of
flow containment, concrete removal, and the installation of a new drop. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,453.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
d Page 2 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Mike Priich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: August 30, 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 4—INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL LATERAL PIPE
This item is for the installation of additional 8-inch lateral pipe at Station 26+06 to connect a new
manhole to an existing sewer. The distance from the new manhole to the existing sewer connection
point was further than shown on the contract drawings. The original work was included in the
Schedule of Prices as a lump sum. Therefore, the additional cost for this item was negotiated with the
contractor. The work consisted of excavating, shoring, bedding and pipe placement, and backfill. This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,488.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5— REMOVAL OF STEEL VENT PIPES
This item is for the removal of abandoned steel pipes at Station 59+50. The pipes were not shown on
the contract drawings. The work consisted of concrete and pipe removal, and material hauling and
dumping. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,349.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 6—ADDITIONAL WORK DUE TO CALICHE SOIL
This item is for additional time spent digging through caliche soil layers along the new sewer alignment
south of the Fair Drive/Fairview Road intersection. Caliche is a hard soil deposit, which requires extra
efforts and special equipment to penetrate. The caliche was not disclosed in the soils reports nor
mentioned elsewhere in the contract documents. The costs are comprised of additional labor and
special dumping fees for the caliche. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $18,395.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $96,969.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: August 30, 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer. Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time
to perform the work is required for this change order, and that no direct, indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: August 25, 1998
Original Contract Time: 400 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: September 29, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 10 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 410 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 9, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None
Actual Final Completion Date: July 2, 1999
Original Contract Price $ 2,277,796.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 115,000.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 96,969.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,489,765.00
Page 4 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: October 27 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Board Authorization Date: October 27, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Re co mended by:
C nstruction Manager Date
App
(� 'S Director of Engineering Dal
Accepted by:
MIKE PRLICH & SONS
Contractor Date
H:Wp.d1," 10B6 6 CONTRACT616121CO2,Cos,Close Cu=612-02.tl
Page 1 of 4 `(
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
103" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Pdich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: Auoust 30. 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Enoineerino Corporation
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $(99.750.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
DEDUCTIONS
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
5. V.F. 72-inch ID MH 169 165 4 600 (2,400.00)
6. V.F. 60-inch ID MH 76 61 15 550 (8,250.00)
9. L.F. 48-inch Casing 110 17 93 650 (60,450.00)
10. SO.FT. Slurry Seal 147.000 0 147.000 0.25 (36,750.00)
13. 2 Ea. Support Wall 2 0 2 2,000 (4,000.00)
14. CU.YD. Encasement 50 0 50 100 (5,000.00)
20. CU.YD. Bedding 200 0 200 22 (4,400.00)
Total Deduction $ (121,250.00)
✓ Page 2 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Pdich &Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: Aucust 30. 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ADDITIONS
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
4. L.F. 24-inch VCP 2,773 2.778 5 220 1,100.00
12. SO.FT. Add. Asphalt 19,300 24,400 5,100 4 20,400.00
Total Addition $21,500
TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(99,750.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: August 30, 1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time
to perform the work is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: August 25, 1998
Original Contract Time: 400 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: September 29, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 10 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 410 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 9, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None
Actual Final Completion Date: July 2, 1999
Original Contract Price $ 2,277,796.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 115,000.00
Change Order No. 2 S 96,969.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (99,750.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 2,390,015.00
'y Page 4 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 27,1999
Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No 6-12
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Board Authorization Date: October 27, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Rec;mended by:
Co struction Manager Date
Ap rovid y:
- /) S
Director of Engineering Data
Accepted by:
MAKE PRLIC�H�B SONS
C'tractor Date /
WadWdatal Mp.00mngVOBa&CONTRAOTS^S121CO2,CO3,Close OWT0512-03.dw
PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date To Bd.of De.
10/7/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Ne1nbe Rem Number
FDC9 t Y� /3 ce)
Orange County Sanitation Di!bx
FROM: David Lu i hector of Engineering
Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT
NO. 11-17-3, HEIL AVENUE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT
NO. 11-20
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve a budget amendment of$1.107,320 for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, for a total project budget of$5,027,720;
(2) Approve a budget amendment of$256,852 for Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract
No. 11-20, for a total project budget of$4,329,752; (3) Approve plans and specifications
for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil
Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20; (4)Approve Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans
and specifications; (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (6)
Award a contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20,
for an amount not to exceed $6,325,000.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement,
Contract No. 11-17-3, Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, were completed in
August, 1999. This combined project was designed by AKM Consulting Engineers.
Contract Nos. 11-17-3 and 11-20 provide for the replacement of an existing sewer and
for a new sewer. The plans and specifications for this project, Goldenwest Street Trunk
Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract
No. 11-20, were bid on August 31, 1999. Contract No. 11-17-3 includes the
construction of,the storm drain and street improvement projects for the City of
Huntington Beach. Contract No. 11-20 only includes the construction of a new trunk
sewer on Heil Avenue. The combined project budget, including the City of Huntington
Beach work, is as follows:
Project Budget (Proposed) $9,357,472
Current Construction Budget $5,566,200
Current Engineer's Estimate $5,500,000
Low Responsible Bid $6,325,000
High Bid $15,091,203
Number of Bids 4
6VVb MgvM p ft RepvY 11-1741RO W.w]L
R~, erxi,re Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The current construction budget for Contract
No. 11-17-3, not including the two City of Huntington Beach cash contract projects, is
$2,443,800. The revised construction budget for Contract No. 11-17-3, which includes
the City of Huntington Beach storm drain/street projects, is $3,523,248. The current
construction budget for Contract No. 11-20 is $2,544,900. The revised construction
budget for Contract No. 11-20 is $2,801,752. Total combined new project budget is
$9,357,472.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1999-00 Budget
Revenue Area 11, Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Page 210)(1999-00 Budget
Revenue Area 11. Heil Avenue Interceptor, Page 210)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contract No. 11-17-3
This project is to abandon an existing 15-inch VCP sewer and replace it with a new
39-inch VCP or RCP sewer with local city sewer connections on Goldenwest Street
from Heil Avenue to Slater Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. This project also
includes two City of Huntington Beach cash contracts for the installation of a new 48-
inch storm drain along with street improvements from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue.
The City of Huntington Beach will reimburse Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)
for their storm drain and street improvement work in this project, in the amount of
$557,441. OCSD will reimburse the City of Huntington Beach in the amount of$20,000
for a portion of the street improvement paving that OCSO would have installed if the
City were not repairing Goldenwest Street. The street repair is included in this project.
Contract No. 11-20
This project is to install a new 30-inch VCP or RCP interceptor sewer on Heil Avenue
from Goldenwest Street to Springdale Street in the City of Huntington Beach. There is
no city work involved in this job.
Conclusion
Both projects, Contract No. 11-17-3 and Contract No. 11-20, were bid together along
with the City of Huntington Beach work within the contract limits. OCSD will be the
administrator for both OCSD sewer projects and the City's two projects. OCSD will
receive an administration/ construction management fee from the City of Huntington
Beach in the amount of$27,872, which is 5 percent of the City's construction costs.
GYglWaMg@Ma Dr8 R.tt110a,,.,l-3MM7"f. ]W,
R—. � Page 2
ALTERNATIVES
t
There are no cost effective alternatives for the sewer work. The District has the option
of providing no coordination between OCSD and the City of Huntington Beach for the
proposed projects. By coordinating both of the OCSD projects and the two City of
Huntington Beach projects together, there would be less inconvenience to the public.
CEQA FINDINGS
Both projects are included in the 1989 Master Plan/EIR. The final EIR was approved on
July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 11-17-3)
2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 11-20)
3. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
RLC:jak
GWphpNeymW pyIAN�MGdtl.�]dMOQ1W.m3 WI
enusa Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement
Contract No. 11-17-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
FROJECT7TASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEI%)
Project Oevelopment $ 5.000 $ 2,900 $ 2,900 S 2.900 $ - S 2.900 S 2,898 100%
Design Set! $ 100.000 $ 174!"0 S 174.440 $ 174.440 $ - $ 174."0 $ 78.221 45%
Consultant PSA $ 85.000 S 03,000 S 83,000 S 63.000 $ - $ 63.000 $ 64740 78%
Construction Contract $ 2.000,000 $ 2,443,800 $ 522,007 S 2.955.807 S 2,965,807 S 2.965.807 0%
Construction toglep S 8.160 $ 8,160 $ SAW $ 8.160 0%
Construction Staff $ 300.000 S 602,700 S 602,700 $ 602,585 $ 002.585 0%
Contingency $ 240,000 S 585,400 S 585,400 $ 0%
District Reimbursement to City
of Huntington Beach Street
Improvements $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 2D.000 $ 20,000
Reimbursement from City of
HB,5%of Constr.Cools for
AdminlConstr.Mgmt.Fee $ 27.875 ' $ 27.872 $ 27,872 $ 27,572 $ 27,672
mm msemen rom yo
HB for Storm DnIin/Slreet
improvement construction
projects in our contrail 1 1 $ 577.500 ' $ 55T441 1 $ 557,441 is 557." $ 557,441 0%
TOTAL S 2,730.000 1 $ 3.920.400 $ 1,107.320 1 $ 5,027,720 S 260.340 S 4.181.865 $ 4,442205 S 145.859 3%
•Amount not induced in current project total budget.
••Amounts now included In proposed revised budget.
HWdaW OBSaCo CTSV1-17J411.179M lNoId.wt mlBwpa ieek
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Heil Avenue Interceptor
Contract No. 11-20
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Design Staff $ 150.000 $ 185,660 $ 185,660 $ 185.660 $ 185.660 $ 61,381 33%
Consultant PSA $ 315.000 $ 90.640 $ 90,640 $ 90,640 $ 90,640 $ 76,138 84%
Construction Contract $ 2.000.000 $ 2,544,900 $ 256.852 $ 2.801.752 $ 2.801.752 $ 2,801.752 0%
Construction Staff $ 685.000 $ 615.400 $ 615,400 $ 615.400 $ 615.400 0%
Contingency $ 636,300 $ 636.300 0%
TOTAL $ 3.150.000 $ 4,072,900 $ 256,852 $ 4.329.752 $ 276.300 $ 3.417,152 $ 3,693452 $ 137,519 4/s
H%"dal NWBS S CONTRACTS%l1.20411-20 Budget Tads rev i AslDwIwcts
n
August 31, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 2
BID TABULATION
Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement
Contract No. 11-17-3
and
Heil Avenue Interceptor
Contract No. 11-20
and
City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, Goldenwest Storm Drain Improvements
from the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel (C05) Channel to the Intersection of
Goldenwest Street and Norma Drive, Cash Contract No. 1042
and
City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, Goldenwest Pavement Rehabilitation from
Slater Avenue to Warner
Cash Contract No. 1103
Engineer's Estimate: $5,500,000.00 Construction Contract Budget: $5,500,000.00
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Ken Thompson, Inc. $ 6,325,000
2. Albert W. Davies, Inc. $ - 7,276,553
3, Steve Bubalo Construction Co. $ 8,086.082
4. Clarke Contracting Corp. $ 15,091.203
5. $
6. $
7. $
8. S
9. $
10. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I, therefore, recommend award to KEN THOMPSON,INC. in the bid amount of$6,325,000 as the
lowest and best bid.
*Corrected amount. ALBERT W. DAVIES, INCAfteorred total was$7,466,553
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
H1wp.dWa ngU0BS 8 CONTRACT&I1-17-3111-17-3 Bid Tab.dw
Revised 05/19/98
OCSD • P.O.Bar 8127 • Fountain valley.CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411
PDC COMMITTEE Meetln/99"t To0/27/99 .
10/7/99 10127/99
AGENDA REPORT RemNumbu IIemNum r
Item Nu 4 3
Orange County Sanitation DiXct
FROM: David Ludector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Mullins, Project Manager
SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO
TREATMENT PLANTS 1 & 2, JOB NO. J-33-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC
Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment
Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, providing for additional engineering services for
an additional amount of$229,187, increasing the total contract amount not to
exceed $2,350,935.
SUMMARY
In September 1998, the original Professional Services Agreement (PSA) was
awarded to SPEC Services, Inc. to design standby power and reliability
improvements to the power systems of Plant Nos. 1 and 2. In the course of
performing this work, situations have arisen which require additional
authorization of funds.
1. Selected motor control centers (MCC's) at both plants are being upgraded
or replaced because of inadequate ratings for reasons described under
Additional Information. Four additional work elements are required to
support the MCC replacement.
2. At Plant 2 Central Generation, generator control wiring revisions are being
made to increase Cengen reliability. Additional field verification work is
required due to lack of as-built information.
3. The Plant 2 Headworks Standby Power Bldg. is being constructed under
an accelerated schedule to be ready for Y2K. The equipment for this
facility is being pre-purchased by authorization of the Board in May 1999;
the construction contract was awarded in June 1999. Additional work is
required to implement the accelerated schedule.
Staff recommends that SPEC Services, Inc. be authorized to perform the
necessary additional services in Addendum No. 1.
GMWIl ryeneaU Repa,d`AY1 lAR IMM Ez
R. . ° w Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The proposed Addendum No. 1 amount will not exceed $229,187. The total
contract price for professional services for this project will not exceed
$2,350,935. See the attached budget table. The amount of the addendum,
$229,187, will be taken from the current contingency amount of$2,248,652 and
added to the budgeted amount of$2,121,748 for the Design PSA for a revised
total PSA amount of$2,350,935.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (FY99-00 Budget,section a, pg 116, Proj J-33-1)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In September 1998, the original Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for
professional services was awarded to SPEC Services, Inc. to perform preliminary
and final design work on selected portions of the power distribution systems of
Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The Scope of Work (SOW) includes fifteen different items of
work concerning electrical equipment replacement. Three scope items require
additional work to be authorized.
A. Motor Control Center Upgrades
This scope item involves upgrading or replacing 35 existing Motor Control
Centers (MCC's)which were identified in a previous study as requiring
replacement. There are four additional work elements needed to support the
MCC replacement:
1. An effort is being made to standardize the layout and control wiring
of all new MCC's being installed to anticipate increased automation
of plant processes under J-42. The MCC's being installed under
J-33-1 will incorporate this concept. This standardization is beyond
the original SOW for SPEC Services, Inc. and affects all design
aspects of MCC replacement. An additional $49,000 is necessary
to conform 35 MCC's to the new standards.
2. Replacement of MCC's requires that as-built information of all
motor control circuits be obtained in order to ensure that the design
of the replacement equipment matches the existing control
functions wire-for-wire and device-for-device. The original SOW
assumed this information was available for all motor control circuits.
Unfortunately, Staff has determined that the documentation for
many control circuits is incorrect. The Consultant must check all
G NtoW 4ge Pafl Rep WCCV lMIWM ,.
Rex. =7M Page 2
y
questionable control circuits. The scope of this project, Project J-42
or Project J-25-4 does not cover this work. The cost for field
verification by SPEC Services, Inc. is $38,205.
3. Two MCC's at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment have existing built-
in eddy-current clutch motor drives. The original scope of work was
based on reusing these drives with the new MCC's. Staff has
determined that reuse is unfeasible due to the obsolescence of the
drives and space restrictions in the equipment room. The obsolete
drives should be replaced. The design work required to replace the
six eddy-current clutch drives and motors is $55,000.
4. One MCC is located in the Plant No. 2 Dewatering Bldg. where
work is being done on the Digester Rehab Project P2-39. The
scope of work for the design of this MCC must be changed to
accommodate the new equipment being added in P2-39. The
original scope of work was written before this addition. This design
change requires $12,576 of additional effort.
B. Central Generation Control Power Reconfiguration
The SOW requires SPEC Services, Inc. to reconfigure the engine control power
circuits in order to enhance reliability of the Cengen facility. At present, control
power for all five of the engine control systems are connected to one
Uninterruptible Power System (UPS). The failure of that UPS causes the entire
Cengen facility to go down. Reconfiguration of the control power will eliminate
the single point of failure. Accurate as-built information on the existing wiring
does not exist, so design of the new control power system cannot be completed.
A cost of$11,082 is required to obtain accurate as-built information.
C. Accelerated Completion of Plant 2 Headworks Standby Power Facility
The original scope item was to design a permanent Standby Power Facility
dedicated to the Plant 2 Headworks to replace the existing trailer-mounted
generators. The design and construction was originally scheduled for completion
in 2001. The project was accelerated to be complete before January 1, 2000.
The equipment for this facility is being pre-purchased by authorization of the
Board in May 1999; the construction contract was awarded in June 1999. SPEC
Services' support is required during the prepurchase process for preparation of
purchase specifications, review of shop drawings, and technical guidance at
vendor meetings. Schedule acceleration was not considered in the original
scope of work. The cost for the additional support is $12,788.
G:MI cWMgB WR Wp lAF 1W7WA%
w W:W7= Page 3
r
Q
D. Plant 2 Headworks Power Reliability Evaluation
Carollo Engineers performed a Headworks Reliability Evaluation Study as part of
the Power System Studies Project J-254 in April 1999. The study recommends
rearrangement of the existing 480Volt sewage pump feeders and adding two
transformers and 480Volt switchgear to the existing equipment. This
rearrangement will provide full operational flexibility and reliability. The J-33-1
scope of work was written before the Carollo study was performed. The cost of
the additional design work is $50,536.
Staff has negotiated the addendum scope, cost, and schedule with the
Consultant. The project design schedule will be extended by two months, with
completion in February 2000.
Staff recommends that SPEC Services, Inc. be authorized to perform the
necessary additional services in Addendum No. 1 for an amount not to exceed
$229,187. The total contract price for professional services of this project will not
exceed $2,350,935.
ALTERNATIVES
No cost-effective alternatives to the work are available. Delays in authorization
of Addendum No. 1 will delay completion of the overall project.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
JCM:jak
GMIpIWeMgeM 02 Pepvb XWW tAR 100M.d.
Ra : w7m Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS
JOB NO. J-33-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 1.030,600 $ 1.030,600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1.030,600 $ 1,030.600 100%
Design Staff $ 1,371,000 $ 1.371,000 $ 808.600 $ 808,600 $ 274,356 34%
Consultant PSA $ 2,121.748 1 $ 229,187 $ 2.350.935 $ 2,121,748 $ 229,187 $ 2,350.935 $ 1.212,159 1 52%
Construction Contract $ 9.240.000 $ 9,240,000 $ g2,590.000 $ 2,590,000 $ 352,000 14%
Construction(Other) $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ $ 15,000 $ 2,040 14%
Construction Staff $ 1.139.000 $ 1,139.000 $ $ 250,000 $ 34,000 14%
Contingency $ 2,248.652 $ (229,187) $ 2,019,465 $ $ - $ 0%
TOTAL $ 15.391,000 $ 17,206.000 $ - $ 17,206,000 $ 6.815.948 $ 229,187 $ 7.045,135 $ 2.905.155 41%
h.wy.4la"rn 72ovnwsaj-s 1.
epee lbsUp xb
Fp Rew M=7M
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. J-33-1
Standby Power and Reliability Improvements
To Treatment Plants 1 and 2
Total Project Budget: $17,206,000
Consultant: SPEC Services, Inc.
Start Date of Project: September 23, 1998
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
9/23/98 Original PSA Standby Power& Reliability Improvements, $2,121,748.00 $2,121,748.00
Job. No. J-33-1
Pending Addendum 1 Additional Work on MCC's, Cengen Controls, Plant $229,187.00 $2,350,935.00
2 Headworks Standby Facility
JMJM
H:\wp.dtalenpt7204nu0insU.33.1U-33-1 PSA Slat Rpt.dx 09/27/99
Revised 0511 U88
PDC COMMITTEE M ngDQ To ad.wur.
10/7/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT IA0Erq' I "°"
Orange County Sanitation Disrij
FROM: David LudLAirector of Engineering
Originator: Moms Ying, Project Manager
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2,
JOB NO. J-35
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget amendment of $6,069,661 to Area Classification Studies
Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, for a revised total project
cost of$7,214,661.
SUMMARY
The recently completed Area Classification Study of both plants has provided the
District with a uniform documentation system showing potential fire and explosion
hazard locations throughout the plants. The study identified many conditions that
met code requirements at the time of construction but are now in violation of
today's code requirements. The study evaluated various options to bring all
facilities into compliance with the latest OSHA/code standards.
Compliance with hazardous location installation requirements is mandated for all
facilities by the National Electric Code. Electrical hazardous area requirements
are retroactive and so must be applied to existing facilities. Potential for areas
with explosions must be built with special methods and materials.
Implementation of the projects will provide the District with full National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) compliance identified in the Area Classification
Study. Full implementation will enhance safety at Plant Nos. 1 and 2.
Staff has created five projects to implement the study recommendations:
• J-35-2 Gas Piping Relocation/Physical Separation $ 5,522,903
• J-35-3 Administrative Control Program $ 546.758
Subtotal $ 6,069,661
• J-35-4 Fire Protection/Detection/Gas Detection $ 3,826,557
• J-355 Ventilation Modifications $ 2,972.343
• J-35-6 Electrical Retrofit $15.606.856
Total $28,475,416
Only projects J-35-2 and J-35-3 are scheduled to begin this fiscal year.
Therefore, this Agenda Report establishes a budget of$6,069,661 for these two
G Nlp'.oGaMgenaa p.I P•pahp -..R 11MW
R. % Page 1
implementation projects. The remaining projects will be budgeted and
scheduled for completion over the next five years.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The funds for these projects are not contained in the FY 1999-00 Capital
Improvement Budget. The costs of remedial projects that resulted from
recommendations of this study were not budgeted for this fiscal year because
they were unknown.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
While these are unbudgeted projects, sufficient funds are available in CORF
budget reserve and can be transferred to fund the recommended projects.
Future fiscal year CORF budgets will incorporate the remaining projects.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Area classification is defined as establishing boundaries where different
possibilities for an explosion exist. A hazardous location is normally defined as a
location where fire or explosion hazards exist due to the presence of flammable
gases or vapors, flammable liquids, etc. Division 1 is a location where an
explosive mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist under normal operating
conditions. Division 2 is a location where an explosive mixture of gas, vapor,
etc., and air can exist under abnormal conditions such as accidental rupture of a
vessel or container or failure of a ventilating system.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) published a recommended
practice entitled NFPA 820 in 1992. This document provides nationally
recognized criteria for fire protection for wastewater treatment and collection
facilities. The document was changed in 1995 from a recommended practice to
a mandatory standard.
District Staff has examined the requirements of NFPA 820 and recommends full
implementation of this standard to provide the recommended safety features.
Further, Staff recommends the existing plant infrastructure be upgraded to
comply with NFPA 820. The recommended vehicle for implementation is Area
Classification Studies for Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35. Job No. J-35-1 is the
Area Classification Study itself, which was approved by the Board on
September 23, 1998. The Area Classification Study identified and documented
the hazardous locations by creating area classification drawings. Code
deficiencies in the plants were noted. Alternative solutions to code violations
were examined and the most cost-effective design was selected for
G:NlpbbvAly�nA 0.ft ReOUK'PO -M AR WW.d.
Rom.. same Page 2
y implementation. The recommended course of action for the full compliance with
NFPA 820 is charted in the Final Report for the Area Classification Study. Five
projects have been recommended with two projects (J-35-2 and J-35-3) being
recommended to start this fiscal year.
• J-35-2 Gas Piping Relocation and Physical Separation at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-3 Administrative Controls Program
• J-35-4 Fire Protection/ Detection System, and Combustible Gas System at
Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-5 Ventilation Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
• J-35-6 Electrical Retrofit at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
Job No. J-35-2 will relocate the low-pressure digester gas piping in the tunnels at
Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to aboveground racks, thereby eliminating potential gas leaks
inside the tunnels. It will also physically separate classified areas from
unclassified areas.
Job No. J-35-3 will develop an administrative controls program for fire prevention
and protection at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This will conform to NFPA 820
requirements and provide on-going control of the fire and safety systems.
Job No. J-35-4 provides the systems necessary to detect gas leaks and fires.
This will provide advance safety warning to personnel at Plant Nos. 1 and 2.
Job No. J-35-5 improves the ventilation system's ability to remove potential
explosive gases throughout the classified areas at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This will
reduce the requirements for special equipment and installations methods and
increase personnel safety.
Job No. J-35-6 will replace the existing general-purpose equipment and common
installations with special equipment and special installation methods. This will
reduce the explosion hazard by the elimination of ignition sources within areas
potentially containing gases at explosive concentrations.
Implementation of the above-mentioned projects will provide the District with full
compliance with NFPA 820 as well as other NFPA regulations identified in the
Area Classification Study J-35-1. Full implementation will significantly enhance
the safety at Plant Nos. 1 and 2.
G+�•e�a.•a o-.n nepu•con�ss iw+mre�.a:
• �^•^ Page 3
a
The implementation schedule is structured around the urgency of remedial
modifications.
Days to Complete Start Date End Date
J-35-2 580 October 1999 February 2002
J-35-3 1,035 November1999 January 2004
J-35-4 575 October 2000 January 2003
J-35-5 505 October2001 October2003
J-35-6 605 October 2001 March 2004
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives to the mandated Area Classifications Studies are available. This
project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safety requirements as
defined by the National Electric Code.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table - Job No. J-35 Summary
Budget Information Table—Job No. J-35-2
Budget Information Table —Job No. J-35-3
MY:jak:jo
o:bgbb vy.Wad x.pn.wocu.ss u11m1w
Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Area Classification Studies and Implementation Plan
JOB NO.J-35 Summary
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECMASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
J-35-1 Project Development $ 1,000.000 S 1.145.000 S 1.145.000 S 1.145,000 S 1.145,000 S 602.784 53%
J-35-2.3 Design Staff S 218.314 S 218,314 $
J-35-2,3 Coms Rant PSA S 953,740 5 953,740 $
J-35-2,3 Construction Ca.IreQ S 3A43.800 $ 3.442.800 $
J-35-2,3 ConsWtlion(Other) $ 14.357 S 14.357 $
J-35-2,3 Construdion Slaty $ 470.261 S 470.261 S
J-35-2,3 CnntiNencr $ 970.189 $ 970.189 S
J-35 TOTAL S 1.000.000 $ 1,145.000 S 6.069.561 $ 7,214,661 $ 1.145.000 $ - S 1.145000 $ 602.784 53%
Notes:J-35.1 is the Area Classification Studies and J-35-2 and 3 are the Implementation Plan.
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Gas Piping Relocation/ Physical Separation
JOB NO. J-35-2
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ $
Design Staff $ 166.405 $ 166.405 $
Consultant PSA $ 698,740 $ 598.740 S
Construction Contract $ 3,392,600 $ 3.392,800 $
Construction(Other) $ 8.463 S 8,463 $
Construction Staff $ 436,011 $ 436,011 $
Contingency $ 920,484 $ 920.484 $
TOTAL 8 - $ - $ 5.522,903 $ 5,522,903 $ - $ $ - $
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Administrative Control Program
JOB NO. J-35-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ - $
Design Staff $ 51,909 $ 51.909 $
Consultant PSA IS 355,000 $ 355,000 Is -
Construction Contract $ 50,000 $ 50.000 $
Construction(Other) $ 5,894 $ 5.894 $ -
Construction Staff $ 34,249 $ 34,249 $
Contingency $ 49.705 $ 49,705 $
TOTAL $ - $ - $ 546.758 1 $ 546.758 1 1 $ - $ - $ - $
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on October 13, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Don Hughes
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Toby Weissert
Shawn Boyd Dan Cassidy
John M. Gullixson Gerald Nichols
Shirley McCracken John Newham
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Dave Briney
John J. Collins, Past Board Chair
STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Jan Debay, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Mark A. Murphy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Mike While, Controller
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager
Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst
Greg Mathews, Assistant to General Manager
Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager
Laurie Bluestein, Communications Action Team
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
r
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ,
Page 2
October 13, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1999
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting, as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson updated the members on the actions taken by the Kem County Board of
Supervisors on the Biosolids Ordinance. The Supervisors voted 5-0 to proceed with the biosolids
ordinance, which bans Class B biosolids in three years on agricultural land in the unincorporated
portions of Kem County imposes road fees and provides for setbacks from groundwater,
neighbors and schools. They also filed a negative declaration in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act with respect to any environmental impacts of the ordinance adoption
Staff and General Counsel are preparing to file a challenge to the CEQA action and to the
ordinance itself. The Board of Directors will be asked to authorize the flings at its next meeting
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Director of Finance Gary Streed referred to the handouts for the Directors that evening. A
revised table was provided for Item 13(a)— Delegation of Authority, a redlined copy of proposed
Ordinance No. OCSD-11, Item 13(b), and copies of letters from the Yorba Linda Water District
regarding Item 13(d).
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources had no report.
(1(l) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications reported that the District's Orange County Fair Program was the
recipient of the City-County Communications and Marketing Association's (3CMA) Silver Circle
Award for"Most Creative Public Outreach Program With Least Dollars Spent".
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel gave the Directors an update on the OCIP's response to the request for additional
legal fees from attorneys representing the County on the bankruptcy issue.
4
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
October 13, 1999
(11-1) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli gave an update to the Directors regarding various options
to manage Class A and B biosolids and possibility of purchasing land in Kings County and Kern
County.
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-e)
a. FAHR99-71: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
September 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR
Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy,
and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
b. FAHR99-72: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of September 21,
1999.
C. FAHR99-73: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report.
d. FAHR99-74: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in
amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with District's purchasing policies.
e. FAHR99.75: Receive and file information related to District costs incurred for
Huntington Beach Closure Project, Subledger#09810318.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 12(a) through 12(e) under Consent Calendar.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e)
a. FAHR99-76: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99- , Establishing Policies and
Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public
Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of
Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions
Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98-43.
The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion and asked questions of staff.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to continue this item to the November
10 FAHR meeting and request staff to report on internal control process as it
relates to the issuance of professional services agreements.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ,
Page 4
October 13, 1999
b. FAHR99-77: Ratify the decision of the General Manager and authorize him to
waive the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC), pursuant to District's
Ordinance No. OCSD99-01, Section 305.6, regarding issuance of the Special
Purpose Discharge Permits to the City of Huntington Beach and the County of
Orange to allow urban runoff to be discharged to the District's wastewater system
for a one-year period effective November 1, 1999.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
C. FAHR99-78:Adopt Resolution No, OCSD 99- , Amending Human Resources
Policies and Procedures, Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Relating tot) Adjust the
Assistant General Manager's pay range (E20) maximum from $136,680 to
$148,836; 2) Move the Director of Information Technology classification from pay
range E17($75,876-$119,784)to pay range E18 ($85,992$139,464); 3) Move the
Warehouse Supervisor classification from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236) to pay
range E9($55,212-$78,156); 4) Move the Contracts & Purchasing Supervisor
classification from pay range Eg ($55,212-$78,156) to pay range Ell ($60,828-
$86,064); 5) Create Contracts Specialist classification at pay range E2 ($39,252-
$55,488); 6) Create Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7
($50,064-$70,848); 7) Reinstate the Safety and Emergency Response Specialist
classification at pay range ES ($52,500-$74,292); and 8) Create Information
Technology Strategic Implementation Leader classification at pay range Ell
($60,828-$86,064).
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carded to approve staffs recommendation.
Director Gullixson also requested that staff provide a listing of all employees
wages and benefits.
d. FAHR99-79: Directoes request to reconsider District's Policy regarding Refund
and Credit for Sanitary Sewer Service Charges.
The Directors entered into a discussion regarding the legality of extending the
time frame in which property owners could request a refund of user fees
erroneously paid in previous years. Director Gullixson referred the Directors to
copies of letters from Yorba Linda Water District that were provided that evening.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to forth an Ad Hoc Committee to do
further study on the District's current policy of refund of user fees and the legality
of extending the time frame in which property owners could request a refund of
those user fees paid erroneously
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 5
October 13, 1999
e. FAHR99-80: Proposed Ordinance Revisions for Capital Facilities Capacity
Charges
General Counsel gave a brief report regarding the need to incorporate the
revisions to Ordinance No. OCSD99-09. The intent of the ordinance when
adopted was to have existing dischargers only pay an additional capital facilities
capacity charge (CFCC) at that time when they expanded their use or facility and
increased their discharge of flow, SOD or suspended solids. A revision of the
ordinance is deemed necessary to clarify certain ambiguities.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to include proposed ordinance
revisions for capital facilities capacity charges in proposed Ordinance No.
OCSD99-11.
(14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS
a. FAHR99-81: State of the District— Employee Audit
Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman gave a brief report on a survey of
employees completed each year to track changes in employee morale, attitude
and perceptions, and to determine the effectiveness of the District's existing
communications programs.
Directors requested that in the future the title of the report not use the word audit.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were no supplemental agenda items.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for November 10, 1999 at 5 p.m.
(18) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the items that are specified as
Item 18(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:02 p.m.
1
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 6
October 13, 1999
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda
Item No. 18(a)(1).
At 7:29 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m.
Submi d by:
Penny Kyl
FAHR Co Litt 4Secretary
H.Wp.d/alapendalOAHRWaha9l99m'nsl101399 FAHR MIN.doc
FAHR COMMITTEE ""no Taxaa.
101,3/99 10/21/:
AGENDA REPORT IemNumtr IemMum
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
SEPTEMBER1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are related to
slight variations in pricing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate
date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
H.,mw
R. ,o„q, Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of September 1999 is attached.
The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements
for the next six months.
On September 3, 1999, $25 million was withdrawn from the Long-Term
Operating Monies portfolio to fund the District's current and projected cash flow
requirements.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts Sept 30, 1999 Yield I%)
State of Calif. LAIF $21,338,008 5.0
Union Bank Checking Account 376.873 —
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,523,000 4.6
PIMCO—Short4erm Portfolio 19,056.870 4.5
PIMCO-Long-temr Portfolio 288.201,643 4.5
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,862 5.0
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32.157,300 6.2
Petty Cash 4.400 —
TOTAL $343,659,958
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
N r.n edn,reio��..�.Nm.n,saaen.ssn.w+-sww ea
Ft. ranAr Page 2
° ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
GGS:SK:lc
�: IMM Page 3
Prepared by Finance, 1
ReportMonthly Treasurer's
es
District Fund Balanc
.4 11 111 111
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII_ IIIIIIIIII
1 1 1 11 11 / •-•y-•y rrwv wrrw
1 •iii�� ������ ���� ����� ���-�1 �����
13 li
6 '
nk Accts M Petty Cash
13 Dist 11 GO Bond Fund
G:�excel.dtakfin\2220\geggi\Finance\monthly treasurers report
MONTHLY REPORT "
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
lNVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 September 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $19,074,336
Mellon $19,056,870
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $19,138,408
• Mellon $19,138,422
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.19
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $36,646
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 54%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return C%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.46 0.39
3 Months: 1.34 1.18
12 Months: 5.04 4.63
Year-to-Date: 3.70 3.44
Commentary
In sharp contrast to July and August,human mica fell mass nil maturities in September(e.g.3-month Treasury Bill rates fell 11 bais points).
• The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 7 basis points.
• PIMCO's emphasis on corporates and agencies added to portfolio returns.
PIMCO will matinee to cmphssiu high quality commercial paper and short-term notes.
N:m,.V'1NANC6I...uup13 D i u0w9 MT
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
LNVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 September 1999)
Long-Term Operating Mantes(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $268,523,761
• Mellon $268,201,643
Historical Cost: $272,419,649
• PIMCO $272,803,456
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.31
Of Index: 2.36
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $6,265,653
15.1A REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 29%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.93 0.81
3 Months: 1.20 1.12
12 Months: 2.28 2.30
Year-to-Date: 1.69 1.77
Commentary
With interest rates falling across all maturities in September,the bond madtet showed stronger mumu.
The Lang-Term ponfolio outperformed its benchmark by 12 basis points.
PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage-backed securities and corpomtes added to ponfolio manna,M these were the best performing sectors.
PIMCO will eontinue to emphasize mortgage-backed securities.
N.'I,WINA Vllal. IREnS£DLM'.RPT
O
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ` 1
BASE USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 30SEP-1999 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMC0
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,669,801.00 2,668,901.00 13.83% 0.00
TREASURY BILLS-LESS T14N IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,181.67 17.67% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,440,218.06 2,440,2HI06 12.64% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN 1 YR 1,197,711.25 1,197,711.25 6.21% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 92,077.30 92,077.30 0,48% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,809,989.28 9,809,989.28 50.83% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,809,989.28 9,809,98918 ----------- 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.AGENCIES 4,698,304.60 4,690,430.00 24.30% -7,874.60
BANKING&FINANCE 3,255,175.30 3,203,901.00 MAD% 51,274.30
INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 851,589.50 4.41% -12,163.50
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 511,200.00 500,960.00 2.60% .10,240.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,328,432.90 9,246,880.50 47.91% -81,552.40
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2 A32.90 -81,552.40
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 243,756.22 243,756.22 1.26% 0.00
TOTAL 243,756.22 243,756.22 1.261/6 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 243,7 .22 03,756.22 1.26% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,382,178.40 19,300,626.00 100.00% -81,.552.40
08-0cf-1999 10:44:55 Execvfive W.,"ewh
Q r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 1
BASE USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-SEP-1999 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
RECEIVABLES 47,160.50 47,160.50 0.02% 0.00
PAYABLES -30,121,165.63 -30,121,165.63 -11.12% 0.00
TOTAL -30,074,005.13 -30,074,005.13 •I I.10% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 36,885,832.66 36,895,932.66 13.62% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 4,881,597.78 4,881,597.78 1.80% 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THN IYR 5,978,500.00 5,978,500.00 2.21% 0.00
MUTUALFUNDS 294,505.70 294,505.70 0.11% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 48,040,436.14 48,040,436.14 17.73% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 17,966 1.01 17,9 ,431.01 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 4Z686,161.70 41,321,861.20 15.25% -1,364,300.50
U.S.AGENCIES 79,008,957.90 76,996,923.74 28.42% -2,022,034.16
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 26,950,937.50 27,313,775.00 10.08% 362,837.50
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,983,207.57 3,951,513.13 1.46% -31,694A4
FHLMC POOLS 9,632,643.37 9,317,644.43 3.51% -114,998.94
FHLMC MULTICLASS 9,566,878.53 8,563,460.85 3.16% -3,417.68
FNMA POOLS 1,688,492.00 1,695,804.42 0.63% 7,312.42
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 100,491.39 100,459.24 0.04% -32.15
ABS:HOME EQUITY 493,597.98 493,286.91 0.18% -310.97
MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 993,300.00 0.37% -6,700.00
BANKING&FINANCE 54,047,184.00 53,857,025.50 19.88% -190,158.50
INDUSTRIAL. 17,029,969.00 16,022,557.80 5.91% -1,007,411.20
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,995,000.00 0.74% -156,250.00
UTILITY.TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,422,600.00 2.74% -74,655.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 254,837,025.94 250,235,212.22 92.37% 4,601,813.62
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5•&7 250,235,212.22 7% -4,601,81
08-oa-1999 10:47:51 &emti.Wo kbe rch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PA Ge ' 2
BASE USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-SEP-1999 FINAL
LONG TERMOPER-PIUCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 2,710,858.93 2,710,858.93 1.00% 0.00
TOTAL 2,710,858.93 2,710,858.93 1.00% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,710,858.93 2,710,858.93 1.00% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 275,514315.78 270,912,502.16 100.00% 401,813M
08-Oe1-1999 10:47.51 Ewculm Workbench
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
OCSF07511102 1991/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/06/99
DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 15.26.00
PAN VALUE YTN AT COMMENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
92,003.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT .000 4.982 AAA 100.000 92,OII.30 .93
996085247 AAA 92,0II.30 .48
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN RIG COMP DISC 4.046 .DOD P-1 97.609 2,440,218.06 24.87
313396NT6 MAY 11/02/1999 A-l+ 2,440,218.06 12.80
900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACKS LP DISC 4.940 .000 P-1 93.563 878,069.00 8.95
30142UY30 11/03/1999 878,061.00 4.61
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 97.462 3,411,181.17 34.77
912795DK4 03/02/2000 DO 03/04/99 A-14 3,411,181.67 1I.90
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MEG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.181 .000 P-1 99.785 898,061.25 9.15
313580MP7 MAY 10/05/1999 A-1s 898,061.25 4.71
300,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MEG ASSN DISC 5.256 .000 P-1 99.883 299,650.00 3.05
313588MBI MAY IO/D8/1999 A-I+ 299,65D.00 1.57
900,000.00 IBM DISC 5.312 .000 P-1 99.589 896,297.00 9.13
44922BXM5 10/21/1999 896,297.00 4.30
900,000.00 GENERAL BLEC CAP DISC 5.333 .000 P-1 99.392 094,435.00 9.11
36959JX65 10/06/1999 894,435.00 4.69
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.930 .038 9,809,989.29 100.00
9,809,989.28 51.46
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN RED CORP DEBS .000 4.I03 AAA 99.568 999,200.00 10.81
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/16/99 AAA 999,680.00 5.25
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BOB 4.960 4.840 AAA 99.350 3,699,104.60 39.91
3133H7EN2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO 01/28/99 AAA 3,690,750.00 19.37
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORD 1ST 6 REF MTG 5.001 2.985 AA3 100.192 511,200.00 5.41
264399DB9 8.000E 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 AA- 500,960.00 2.63
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 13.221 Al 100.218 529,010.00 5.41
131205AT4 13.250E 10/15/1999 A9 501,090.00 2.63
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2
MSF07511102 1999/05/30 RUN DATE S 10/06/99
DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUM TIMC S 15.26.08
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 6-P PRICE MIUKET VALUE 9 'TOTAL
_____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ _________-
850,000.00 PHILLIP MONNIE CO INC NTS 5.258 2.112 A2 100.187 863,753.00 9.20
218154BX4 3.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 A 851,569.50 4.42
900,000.00 GENERAL WAS ACCEP CORD MTN 5.305 6.249 A2 100.014 905,657.00 9.73
32042M2G2 6.250% 01/21/2000 DO 01/11/94 A 900,121.00 4.72
500,000.00 TRAESAMERICA FIN MTM 4SSDOIIO 5.653 9.404 AT 100.544 515,125.00 5.43
8935OMEPI 8.450% 02/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 A 502,720.00 2.64
900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 5.922 6.188 BAA1 100.029 9D1,162.30 9.73
31809CS04 6.190E 10/20/1999 DO 10/20/97 A- 900,261.00 4.22
400,000.00 LENMAN BROS NLDGS MTN TR 00252 6.353 6.405 A3 99.926 400,216.00 4.32
52517PLMI 6.4004 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,704.00 2.10
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.235 5.832 9,320.432.9D 100.00
9.246.880.5D 48.53
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL 4.552 3.234 19,139,422.18 100.00
19,056,969.78 100.00
1
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
MSF07522202 1999/09/30 RUN DATE 10/06/99
DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 15.26.08
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
294,505.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.982 AAA 100.000 294,SOS.I0 .61
996085241 AAA 294,505.70 .10
6,000,000.00 FEDERAL MORE LN BE CONS DISC 5.319 .000 P-1 99.642 5,979,500.00 12.44
313384HGO HAT 20/22/1909 A-1♦ 5,978,500.00 2.00
4,900,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MINI ASSN DISC MT 5.220 .DOO P-1 99.624 4,881,507.79 10.16
313588NK2 MAT 10/25/99 A-14 4,081,597.78 1.64
14.000.000.D0 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 5.301 .000 P-1 99.604 13,944,560.00 29.02
74271SX42 10/04/1999 13,944,560.00 4.68
I.00D,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 5.303 .000 99.560 6,969,200.00 14.50
02581SKT3 1D/23/1999 6,969,200.00 2.34
1,200,000.00 HENLETT PACKARD DISC 5.316 .000 P-1 99.982 1,198.584.DO 2.49
42824KX55 10/05/1999 1,198,584.00 .4D
13,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAT CP DISC 5.329 .000 P-1 59.823 12,976,946.66 29.01
36959JX57 10/05/1999 12,976,946.66 4.35
1,800,000.00 IBM DISC 5.330 .000 P-1 99.808 1.796,542.00 3.73
44522BX45 10/04/1999 1.196,542.00 .60
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.207 .058 48,040,436.14 100.00
48,040,436.14 16.11
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.907 Al 99.806 1.992.900.00 .I9
066365DN4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/90 A- 1,996,120.00 .67
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MEN IM00615 .000 5.530 Al 99.828 3,498,635.00 1.39
1712DQESO FLTG RT 00/08/2002 DD 04/09/98 A. 3,493,980.00 1.17
2,000,000.00 FORD MTN CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.606 Al 99.812 1,998,613.60 .99
3453975CS FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/18 A 1,996,240.00 .63
3,000,000.00 GENERAL HERE ACCEP MTN .000 5.595 A2 100.015 3,010,030.00 1.19
33042WVR9 FLTG RT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/98 A 3,000,450.00 1.01
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 4
OCSF07522202 1999/09/30 RUN DATE 10/06/99
DISTRIM LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMC 15.26.08
PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MAMET VALUE 1 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________--
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.510 A2 99.949 3,918.768.50 1.57
37042SOV5 PLTG RT 00/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 A 3,947,985.50 1J2
2,000,000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS .000 5.459 A3 100.334 2,000,000.00 .80
423328DRS PLTG RT 06/25/2002 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,006,680.00 .67
3100D.D00.00 HELLER PINL MTN ITR 00246 .000 5.530 A3 100.598 3,000,000.00 1.20
42333RLP7 PLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 3,013.940.00 1.01
4,000,000.00 SOUSENOLO FIN CO MTD .000 5.444 A2 100.0I9 4,000,000.00 1.59
441BIRZAS FLTG NY 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 A 4,003,160.00 1.34
1,000,000.00 NOUSESOLD PIN NTN SR /00570 .000 5.743 A2 100.014 999,198.90 .39
44183EZT4 FLOG RT 08/01/2001 DO 0 t04/9B A 1.000.140.00 .34
.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 .000 AM .000 .DO .00
9I28233G5 06.2501 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 AAA .00 .00
3.205,320.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.690 3.651 AAA 91.297 1.262,163.22 2.89
9128273AS 3.6251 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 AM 7,234,104.20 2.43
10.520,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.323 3.534 AM 95.500 10,241,575.00 4.01
9128232M3 3.3351 O1/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AM 20,043.173.00 3.37
19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ADDS 117N 4.943 6.600 AAA 101.062 20,012,510.00 7.67
31364CZY7 6.6301 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 AM 39r201.7BO.00 6.44
4,000,000.00 NORGAN STANLEY HTH IM 00299 5.170 5.481 AA3 99.609 3,993.788.00 1.59
6174SENLI MW RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 Al 3,984,360.00 1.34
5,000,000.00 U S YREMURY BONDS 5.234 9.461 AM 117.594 6.233.593.35 2.34
912BIODE5 11.125% O6/15/2003 DO 07/05/03 AM 5,879.700.00 1.93
2,100,000.00 U 6 TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.291 MA 101.320 2,161.321.15 .85
912827Z54 06.3751 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,127,800.00 .71
900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 3.241 AAA 103.578 967.825.47 .37
912827D25 03.5001 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 MA 932,202.00 .31
5,200,000.00 U 8 TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.790 AM 121.297 6,690,250.00 2.52
912810WO 11.8751 11/15/2003 DO 10/O5/83 AM 6o303.444.00 2.11
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR SYR 5.650 6.511 AA3 99.832 1,543,215.00 .59
046003WO 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO O7/11/97 M- 1,497,480.00 .50
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSF07522202 1999/09/30 RUN DATE t 10/06/99
DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE , 15.26.00
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MONET VALUE % TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
1,000,000.00 HELLER FIMAMCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.853 43 98.246 999,730.00 .39
42333HKJ0 5.350% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 982,460.00 .33
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD MTN 5.804 6.663 A2 90.156 2,060,739.00 .DB
0124000N6 6.5401 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,968,027.80 .66
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.812 6.174 AAA 101.234 5,086,402.25 2.02
9128272LS 06.2504 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 AAA 5,061,700.00 1.90
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.849 6.701 A2 98.937 3,073,170.00 1.18
81240OJAI 6.630% 07/05/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 2,968,110.00 1.00
14,7SO,ODO.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 5.882 6.215 AAA 91.835 14,560.462.50 5.41
31364GLD9 5.7106 22/15/2000 DO 12/15/98 AAA 13,551,562.50 4.54
61000,000.00 HATIONSBARK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 5.082 5.850 AAI 100.000 5,996,400.00 2.35
63858JOE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/98 AA- 6,000,000.00 2.01
710,013.15 PMLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.911 99.812 709,014.69 .28
3133T02D5 5.900% D6/15/2017 708,670.33 .24
15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN MTN 5.981 5.044 AAA 99.594 14,955,300.00 5.92
3136492V0 5.8200 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,939,100.00 5.01
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.380 AA3 99.919 2,526,725.00 .99
59018SKP4 6.3350 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,497,975.00 .04
7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.063 AAA 98.969 7,497,255.00 2.96
079867AXS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/9B AAA 7,422,600.00 2.49
12,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN MTG CORP DEBS 6.062 6.019 AAA 99.610 I2,495,625.00 4.93
3134A36M1 6.00D4 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/99 AAA 12,461,250.00 4.18
2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR HTS 6.133 6.186 A2 99.009 11999,600.00 .79
06605TAL6 6.1251 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A- 1,98D,I80.00 .66
100,491.40 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.202 AAA 99.968 100,491.39 .04
31633EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/16 100,459.24 .03
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 6.201 6.242 A3 99.330 11000,000.00 .39
13317YADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB. 993,300.00 .33
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLA98 CTF 2146 OT 6.207 6.108 AAA 98.234 2,455,059.38 .98
3133TKKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,455,B59.38 .82
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSP07522202 1999/D9/30 RUN DATE : 10/06/99
DISTRICTt TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 15.26.08
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT NODDY HARKEY TOTAL COST/ t TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE BARNEY VALUE t TOTAL
_____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
493,597.80 GREEN THEN CORD 99-0 CL A-1 6.290 6.214 AM 99.937 493,597.08 .19
3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DD O8/26/99 AAA 493,206.11 .13
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN MIN 6.291 6.226 AAA 100.062 4,408,705.00 1.39
31364CXVS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,502,790.00 1.51
6,250,000.00 CONNIT TO PUR GNM SP BIG 6.301 6.464 AAA 92.02E 5,78I,250.00 2.31
OIN06D6A9 6.000% 10/15/2028 AM 5,801,750.00 1.95
3,397,400.68 FNLNC HULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 5.838 AAA 101.752 3,401,116.46 1.38
3133WE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 AAA 1,456,923.14 1.16
2,OOD,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.780 A2 99.438 2,031,960.00 .39
023902AH1 6.050% 04/15/2003 A 1,988,760.00 .63
5,000,000.00 LBNNAN BROS ELMS NTH 100196 6.364 6.642 A3 100.125 5,039,450.00 2.00
52513PJD4 6.650% 12/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 A S,D06,250.00 1.69
2,000,0U0.00 FHLHC MULTICLRSS CTF III A6 6.496 6.694 AAA 93.100 2,00D,080.00 .TY
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,942,000.00 .65
2,339,420.34 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF HER 1620Y 6.542 6.896 AM 87.009 2,183,280.40 .81
3133TVA4 6.O001 ll/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AM 2,035,506.24 .68
22,SU0,000.00 CONNIT TO PUR GERA SF NTG 6.564 6.799 AM 95.609 21,169,687.50 6.59
0IN0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2029 AM 21,512,025.00 7.21
730,000.00 CONNIT TO PUR IBM IITN 6.533 6.526 AM 97.680 713,118.75 .28
IIFO216AO VAR RT 10/01/2029 AM 313,11e.75 .24
9,OU0,000.00 PHILIP M ARIA COS NT 6.593 9.142 A2 101.176 9,903,790.00 3.63
218154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 A 9,105,840.00 3.05
9,404,448.86 PHLHC GROUP IGS-0436 6.628 6.936 AAA 100.350 9,632,643.37 3.80
3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/20D3 DO 02/01/90 AM 9,517,644.43 2.19
2,226,022.63 GNMA II POOL /080080M 6.705 6.309 AAA 101.047 2,274,716.87 .89
36225CC20 6.335t 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 AM 2,249,329.09 .35
10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN BIG CORP USES 6.311 6.425 AM 98.043 10,323,075.00 4.11
3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 OD O6/01/99 AM 10,294,935.00 3.45
2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNM COS INC SR NT 6.317 6.690 A2 99.029 1,992,260.00 .39
571748MO 6.625% 06/15/2004 OD 06/14/99 M- 1,980,580.00 .66
YLIMNAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3
MSP07522202 1999/09/30 RUN DATE , 10/06/99
DISTRICT, TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 15.26.00
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY BARNET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
3,000,000.00 FORD MM CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.339 6.730 Al 99.438 2,995,080.00 1.19
345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 2,983,140.00 1.00
2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOS INC NT 6.866 6.923 A3 90.949 2,498,400.00 .98
22237UAB0 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,473,725.00 .83
1,680,654.85 GNMA 3I POOL 10000023 6.869 6.911 AAA 101.281 1,708,490.70 .68
36225CAE9 0.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,702,184.04 .57
996,072.89 FNMA POOL 00252703 6.877 6.599 AAA 98.656 975,373.25 .39
31371HU48 6.500% 09/01/2006 OD 09/01/99 AAA 9B2,605.67 .33
2,500,000.00 U 8 TREASURY BONDS 6.906 B.971 AAA 149.266 4,029,030.31 1.49
912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 AAA 3,731,650.00 1.25
2,000,000.00 SANG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.221 BAA3 99.750 2,151,250.00 .79
54267ICT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 A- 1,995,000.00 .69
________ _______ _________________ _________
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.530 6.141 254,833,025.84 100.00
250,235,212.22 83.89
________ _______ _________________ _________
TOTAL 4.549 5.960 302,677,461.98 100.00
298,275,648.36 100.00
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN 03-Sep-1999 -25,000,000.00
NA9123459 ADMINISTRATOR 0.00
CW 03-Sep-1999 0.00
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR AUGUST 02-Sep-1999 -1.70
NA9123459 0.00
CW 02-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR AUGUST 02-Sep-1999 -L70
NA9123459 0.00
C W 02-Sep4999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 16-Sep-I999 -0.85
99362E418 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 0.00
CW 16-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 17-Sep-1999 -0.85
99362F258 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 17-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-Sep-1999 .0.85
99362F902 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 20-Sep-1999 0.00
08-0ct-1999 10:26:35 Executtve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 21-Sep-1999 -0.85
99362G926 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 22-Sep-1999 -0.95
993621-1585 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00
CW 22-Sep-1999 0.00
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
21,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Sep-1999 -21,125.00
9%085247 01-Sep-1999 21,125.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
21,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Sep-1999 -21,125.00
996085247 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 01-Sep4999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
140,175-25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Sep-1999 -140,175.25
996085247 01-Sep-1999 140,175.25
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
140,175.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 015ep-1999 -140,175.25
996085247 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 01-Sep-1999 0.00
08.Oct-1999 f016.35 Ezecutiw Wo kbe.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PALE: 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
749.71 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 03-Sep-1999 -749.71
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 03-Sep-1999 749.71
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,490.55 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 03-Sep-1999 -3,480.55
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 03-Sep-1999 3,480.55
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
749.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Sep-1999 -749.71
996095247 07-Sep-1999 749.71
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
749.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Sep-1999 -749.71
996085247 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,610,443.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Sep-1999 -14,610,443.17
996085247 07-Sep-1999 14,610,443.17
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,610,443.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Scp-1999 -14,610.443.17
996085247 07-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 PROCPER&GAMBLE DISC 07-Scp-1999 -13,944,560.00
74271SX42 10/04/1999 07-Sep-1999 13,944,560.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS h CO,NY 0.00
08.Oeh1999 10.26:35 Eeeculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01SEP-1999 -30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 07-Scp-1999 -13,944,560.00
74271 SX42 10/04/1999 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 07-Sep-1999 -299,030.17
02680KWV6 09/29/1999 07-Sep-1999 299,030.17
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 AMERITECH COPP DISC 07-Sep-1999 -299,030.17
02680KWV6 09/29/1999 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,900,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 09-Sep-1999 -3,888,646.67
80311BWV9 0929/1999 09-Sep-1999 3,888,646.67
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,900,000.00 SAP LEE CORP DISC 09-Sep-1999 -3,888,646.67
80311BWV9 0929/1999 09-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 09-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
761,873.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Scp-1999 -761,873.21
996085247 15-Sep-1999 761,873.21
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
761,973.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Sep-1999 -761,873.21
9%085247 15-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 l0:16.'35 Execiam Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ' 5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,061.98 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-Sep-1999 -8,061.98
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 15-Sep-1999 8,06L98
B A.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 15-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362E418 05.1009/.09/1&1999 DO 09/15/ 15-Sep-1999 400,000.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CONY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 15-Sep-1999 -400,000.00
99362E418 05.100%09/16/1999 DO 09/15/ 15-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
55.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-1999 -55.82
9%085247 16-Sep-1999 55.82
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,462.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I6-Sep-1999 -8,462.29
996085247 16-Sep-1999 8,462.29
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
55.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I6-Sep-1999 -55.82
996085247 16-Sep-1999 0.00
FC I&Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,462.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-1999 -9,462.29
996085247 16-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 16-Sep-1999 0.00
08-0ct-/999 I0:2635 Fiecuti.Workberrch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsGppploppp 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOWDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE CAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,75L03 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-Sep-1999 -14,751.03
9%087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 16-Sep-1999 14,751.03
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Sep-1999 A00.000.00
99362F258 05.125%09/17/1999 DO 091161 16-Sep.1999 400,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362F258 05.125%09/17/1999 DO 091161 16-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 16-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57,144.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-1999 -57,144.63
996095247 17-Sep4999 57,144.63
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57,144.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-1999 -57,144.63
996085247 17-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 17-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
56.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-1999 -56.09
996085247 17-Sep4999 56.09
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
56.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-1999 -56.09
996095247 17-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 17-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oet-1999 10:16.85 Executive Wwkbe mh
Qr ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362F902 05.050%0920/1999 DO 09/17/ 17-Sep-1999 400,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362F902 05.050%0920/1999 DD 09/17/ 17-Scp-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 17-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,493.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-I999 .6,483.90
996085247 20-Sep-1999 6,483.90
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,483.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-1999 -6,483.90
996085247 20-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
93,692.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-1999 -83,692.67
996085247 20-Sep.1999 93,692.67
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
83,692.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-1999 -83,692.67
996095247 20-Sep4999 0.00
FC 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Sep-1999 ,400,000.00
99362G926 05.150%09/21/1999 DO 09/201 20-Sep-1999 400,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
08-Oct-I999 /0.26:35 Lxecutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Sep-1999 -400.000.00
99362G926 05.150%0921/1999 DD 0920/ 20-Sep-1999 0.00
PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20Scp-1999 -898,061.25
313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 20-Sep-1999 898,061.25
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Sep-1999 -898,061.25
313588MP7 MAT 10/05/1999 20-Sep-1999 0.00
PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 20-Scp-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
56.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Scp-1999 -56.37
996085247 21-Sep-1999 56.37
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
56.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Sep-1999 -56.37
9%085247 21-Scp-1999 0.00
PC 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
186,075.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Sep-1999 -186,075.19
996085247 21-ScpA999 186,075.19
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
186,075.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Sep-1999 -186,075.19
996085247 21-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 21-Sep-1999 0.00
08--0ct-/999 1016:35 Executive IVorkbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Sep-1999 400,000.00
993621-1585 05.040%09/22/1999 DD 09/21/ 21-Sep-1999 400,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Sep-1999 400.000.00
993621-1585 05.040%09/22/1999 DO 09/21/ 21-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Sep-1999 -1,796,542.00
44922BX45 10/04/1999 21-Sep-1999 1,796,542.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Sep-1999 -1,796,542.00
44922BX45 10/04/1999 21-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Sep4999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,703.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-1999 -3,703.00
996095247 23-Sep-1999 3,703.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,703.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Scp-1999 -3,703.00
996085247 23-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
203,446.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-1999 -203,446.96
996085247 23-Sep-1999 203,446.96
B 0.00
08-Oc1-1999 10.26..35 &,,wtw IfWbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
203,446.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-1999 -203.446.86
996095247 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 23-Scp-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 IBM DISC 23-Sep-1999 -896,297.00
44922BXM5 10/21/1999 23-Sep-1999 $96,297.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 IBM DISC 23-Sep-1999 -896,297.00
44922BXM5 1021/1999 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 23-Sep-1999 -12,976,946.66
36959JX57 10/05/1999 23-Sep-1999 12,976,946.66
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP CP DISC 23-Sep-1999 -12,976,946.66
36959JX57 [010511999 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
55,698.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-1999 -55,698.32
996085247 24-Sep-1999 55,698.32
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
55,698.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-1999 -55,698.32
996085247 24-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 24-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Ocr-1999 10:16:35 &ecrnlve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. H
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 27-Sep-1999 -1,198,584.00
42924KX55 10/05/1999 27-Sep-1999 1,198,584.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 HEWLETT PACKARD DISC 27-Sep-1999 -1,198,584.00
42824KX55 10/05/1999 27-Sep-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-Sep-1999 -6,969,200.00
02581SXT3 10/27/1999 27-Sep-1999 6,969,200.00
B AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 27-Sep-1999 -6,969,200.00
02581SXT3 10/27/1999 27-Sep-1999 0.00
PC AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 27-Sep-1999 -5,978,500.00
313384NGO MAT 10/22/1999 27-Sep-1999 5,978,500.00
B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 27-Sep-1999 -5,978.500.00
313384NGO MAT 10/22/1999 27-Sep-1999 0.00
PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 29-Sep-1999 -4,981,597.78
313588NK7 MAT 10,25/99 29-Sep-1999 4,881,597.78
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 29-Sep-1999 -4,891,597.78
313588NK7 MAT 10/25/99 29-Sep-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,556.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-1999 -6,556.25
996085247 30-Sep-1999 6,556.25
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,556.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-1999 -6,556.25
996085247 30-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 30-Scp4999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
66,937.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-1999 -66,937.50
996085247 30-Sep-1999 66,937.50
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
66,937.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-I999 -66,937.50
996085247 30-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 30-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 30-Sep-1999 -299,650.00
313588MSI MAT 10/08/1999 30-Sep-1999 299,650.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 30-Sep-1999 -299,650.00
31358SMSI MAT 10/08/1999 30-Sep-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Sep-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
08-Oct-1999 10:16:35 Execwire Workbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: '13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000/a000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 14-Jul-1999 475,320.90
3621OA5TO 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 475,320.90
BC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-492.401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 14-Jul-1999 2,044.83
36210A510 6.5000/.02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
IBC 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 144ul-1999 477,365.73
3621OA5TD 6.500%02/152029DD02101/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
FCC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL80508706 14-Jul-1999 475,320.84
36211CDK5 6.500%08/1512029 DO OW01/ 24-Aug-1999 475,320.84
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL80508706 14-Jul-1999 -2,044.83
36211CDK5 6.500%0 811 52 0 2 9 DD 08/01/ 24-Aug.1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL80508706 14-Jul-1999 -477,365.67
36211CDK5 6.500%09/152029 DO 08/OU 24-Aug-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 28-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Aug-1999 -11,362,500.00
OING62698 6.5009/609/152028 21-Sep-1999 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oca1999 10.26.35 Ecewive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-Aug-1999 -9,879,843.75
OING62699 6.500%09/152029 21-Sep-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 09-Aug-1999 -5,658,203.13
OIN060692 6.00%9/15/2028 21-Sep-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Scp-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH I I-Aug-1999 -712,206.25
I IFOI 1693 VAR RT 09/01/2029 23-Sep-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Sep-1999 -9,889,687.50
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-Oct-1999 9,889,687.50
B DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Sep-1999 -11,280,000.00
OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152029 21-0ct-1999 11,280,000.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
996,072.89 FNMA POOL#0252703 02-Scp-1999 -975,373.25
31371HU48 6.5005/6 09/01/2006 DD 09/01/ 23-Sep-1999 975.373.25
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
996,072.89 FNMA POOL#0252703 02-Sep-1999 -3.956.62
31371HU48 6.500%09/012006 DO 09/01/ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
08-Oct4999 10.46..35 Erecntive W.,kkmh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
996,072.99 FNMA POOL#0252703 02-Sep-1999 -979,329.87
31371HU48 6.5001/.09/012006 DO 09/01/ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
730,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA I ITH 10SCP-1999 -713,118.75
11 FBI 16AO VAR RT I0/012029 25-OM-1999 713,118.75
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Sep-1999 -5,781,250.00
OIN0606A9 6.000%10/15/2029 21-Ou-1999 5,781,250.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
40000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 002 17-Sep-1999 400,216.00
52517PLMI 6.400%0 813 02 0 0 0 DO 092619 22-Sep-1999 400,216.00
B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 002 17-Sep-1999 -2,631.11
52517PLM I 6.400°/.081302000 DO 0926/9 22-Sep-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 002 17-Sep-1999 -402,847.11
52517PLM1 6.4000/.08/302000 DO 0926/9 22-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 29-Sep-1999 -2,455.959.39
3133TKKU3 6.0005:11/152011 04-Oa-1999 2,455,859.38
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
08-Oa-1999 10:26:35 E'e wwo Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 29-Sep-1999 -1,250.00
3133TKKU3 6.0001/6111152011 04-OG-1999 0.00
IB 0.00
PAY UPS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
30.500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-1u1-1999 -30,500.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 01/151 15-1ul-1999 30.300.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
30,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-1ul-1999 -30,500.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jul-1999 0.00
FC 30-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21,070.DO US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-1999 -21,070.00
9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DD 07/15/ 15-Jul-1999 21,070.D0
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21,070.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 154ul-1999 -21,070.00
9129273AB 3.625%0 711 5 2 00 2 DO 07/1 S/ 15-Jul-1999 0.00
PC 30-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep.1999 -57.00
3133TCE95 6.324%081152032 01-SCP-1999 57.OD
PU 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 Executive;V ekbmM
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: "17
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 -57.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 13-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,639.94 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Sep-1999 -11,633.94
3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11101/9 01-Sep-1999 IL638.94
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,638.94 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Sep-1999 -11,638.94
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11101/9 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 1.70
996095247 03-Sep-1999 -1.70
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 1.70
996085247 03-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 03-Sep-I999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-756,152.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 756,152.26
996085247 03-Sep-1999 -756,152.26
S 0.00
08-Oc1-1999 10:26.35 Eeemoi.Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-756,152.26 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 756.152.26
996085247 03-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 03-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.14,000,000.00 IBM DISC 03-Sep-1999 13,939,216.67
449228WH7 09/17/1999 03-Sep-1999 -13,939.216.67
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 IBM DISC 03-Sep-1999 31.927.77
449228WH7 09/17/1999 03-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 IBM DISC 03-Sep-1999 13,971,144.44
44922BWH7 09/17/1999 03-Sep-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,300.000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 03-Sep-1999 10,259,262.11
80311BWM9 09/21119" 03-Scp-1999 .10,258,262.11
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,300,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 03-Sep-1999 14,442.89
80311BWM9 0921/1999 03-Sep-1999 0.00
Is o.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.10,300,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 03-Sep-1999 10,272,705.00
80311BWM9 0921119" 03-Sep.1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03Sep-1999 0.00
08-Ocl-1999 10:26:35 &eculiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PASE. '19
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-749.71 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 07-Sep-1999 749.71
9%087094 VAR RT DO 06(1WI997 07-Sep-1999 -749.71
S 0-00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.3.480.55 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 07-Sej�1999 3.480.55
9%087094 VAR RT DO 06r2611997 07-Sep4999 -3,480.55
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,688,646.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Sep-1999 1,698,646.67
996085247 09-Sep.1999 -1.688,646.67
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,698,646.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Sep-1999 1,688,646.67
996085247 09-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 09-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Sep-1999 1.50
996085247 14-Sep-1999 -1.50
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Sep-1999 1.50
996085247 14-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 14-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-60,707.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Sep-1999 60,707.50
996085247 15-Sep-1999 -60,707.50
S 0.00
08-Ocl-1999 10.-26.-35 Ereculive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
oCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-60,707.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Sep-1999 60,707.50
996085247 15-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,061.98 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-Sep-1999 8,061.98
996087094 VAR RT DO 0W6f1997 1&Sep-1999 -8,061.98
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 16-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362E418 05.100%09/16/1999 DO 09/15/ 16-Sep-1999 -400,000.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 16-Sep-1999 56.67
99362E418 05.100°009/16/1999 DD 09/151 16-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 16-Sep-1999 400,056.67
99362E418 05.100%09/16/1999 DD 091151 16-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,751.03 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-Sep-1999 14,751.03
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 17-Sep-1999 44,751.03
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362F258 05.125%09117/1999 DD 09/161 17-Sep-1999 400,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
08-Go-1999 10.06.35 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '21
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Sep-1999 56.94
99362F258 05.125%0 911 7/1 9 9 9 DO 09/16/ 17-Scp-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Sep-1999 400,056.94
99362F258 05.125%09/17/1999 DD 09/16/ 17-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 11-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362F902 05.050%0920/1999 DD 09/17/ 20-Scp-1999 ,400,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Sep-1999 169.33
993621`902 05.0501%0920/1999 DD 09/17/ 20-Scp-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Sep-1999 400,168.33
99362F902 05.050%09/20/1999 DD 09/17/ 20-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 20-Sep-I999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Sep-1999 400,000.00
99362G926 05.150-A 0921/1999 DO 0920/ 21-Sep-1999 400,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Sep-1999 57.22
99362G926 05.150%0921/1999 DO 0920/ 21-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
08.0c1-1999 10:16:35 aecutive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 22
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITYID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-SwI999 400,057.22
99362G926 05.150560921/1999 DO 09/20/ 21Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
.2,791.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22Sep-1999 2,791.96
996085247 22-Sep-1999 -2,791.96
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,791.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22Sep-1999 2,791.96
996085247 22-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 22-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22Sep-1999 400,000.00
993621-1585 05.040-A 0922JI999 DO 09211 22-Sep-1999 -400,000,00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22Sep-1999 56.00
9936211585 05.040%092L1999 DO 0921/ 22-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Sep-1999 40g056.00
993621-1585 05.040%0922/1999 DO 0921/ 22-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 22-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13.432,982.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27Sep-1999 13,432,982.24
996085247 27-SWI999 -13,432,982.24
S 0.00
08-0c1-1999 10.26.35 Eeeculm Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. '23
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,432,982.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27Sep4999 13,432,982.24
996085247 27-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,463-71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Sep-1999 11,463.71
996085247 28-Sep-1999 .11,463.71
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,46171 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Sep-1999 11,463.71
996085247 28-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 28-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-681,597.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Sep-1999 681,597.78
996085247 29-Sep.1999 ,681,597.78
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-691,597.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Sep-1999 691,597.78
996085247 29-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 29-Sep-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.06 GNMA POOL40486958 06-Aug-1999 -463,857.19
36210A5TO 6.500%02/15/3029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 475,320.90
SC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 11,463.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.06 GNMA POOL 80486958 06-Aug-1999 -2,044.83
36210AM 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/OI/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
ISC 0.00
08-0ct-/999 I026:35 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 24
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSDCONSOL/DATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.06 GNMA POOL#0486958 06-Aug-1999 465,902.02
3621OA5TO 6.500%021152029 DO 02/0I/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
FCC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL#0508706 06-Aug-1999 463,857.13
3621 ICDK5 6.500%0911 5/2 02 9 DO 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 475,320.94
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -11,463.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL#0508706 06-Aug-1999 2,044.93
36211CDK5 6.500%08/152029 DO 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
492,401.00 GNMA POOL#0508706 06-Aug-1999 465,901.96
36211CDK5 6.500%09/152029 DO 08/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 28Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Sep4999 11,294,062.50
OIN062699 6.5000A 09/152029 21-Sep4999 -11,329,250.00
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -35.187.50
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURONMASFMTG 02-Sep.1999 11,294,062.50
OIN062698 6.500%09/15/2029 21-Sep-1999 0,00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Scp-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Sep-1999 9,901,992.19
OIN062698 6.500%09/152029 21-Sep-1999 .9,913,093.75
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR .11,101.56
08-0ct-1999 10:26,35 Ereculiw 01 ekbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAI E: -25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
=&CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Sep-1999 9,901,992.19
OIN062698 6.500%09/15/2029 21-Sep-1999 0.00
PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.3,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 3,770,820.31
9128272W 1 06.500%05/312002 DO 06/02/ 07-Sep-1999 -3.810,555.78
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C -39,735.47
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES - 03-Sep-1999 65,05328
9128272W I 06.500%05/312002 DO 06MV 07-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 3,835,873.59
9128272 W I 06.500%05/312002 DD 06/02/ 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-I999 5,572,187.50
9128273GS 06.250%09/31/2002 DD 09/02/ 07-Sep-1999 -5.677,682.23
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -105,494.73
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 6,610.58
9128273GS 06250%081312002 DD 09/02/ 07-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 5,578,798.08
9128273GS 06.250eA 08/312002 DO 09/021 07-Sep-1999 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10:26:35 Exeewi.Weekkwh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG COPP DEB 03-Sep-1999 2,489,000.00
3134A3ZMI 6.000%07/202001 DD 07/20/9 07-Sep-1999 -2,497,125.00
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -9,125.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Sep-1999 19,583.33
3134A3ZMI 6.00D%0720/2001 DO 0720/9 07-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,50D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Sep-1999 2,507,583.33
3134A3ZMI 6.000%07202001 DD 0720/9 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-Sep-1999 9,067,200.00
31364CBD9 6.625%041192001 DO 04/18/9 07-Sep-1999 -9.012,576.00
S BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK 54.624.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-81000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-Sep-1999 204,638.89
31364CBD9 6.625%04/182001 DD04/18N 07-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-Sep-1999 8,271,838.89
31364CBD9 6.625%04/182001 DD04119M 07-Sep-1999 0.00
PC BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 8,601,601.56
9128272G6 D6.250%0113 12 0 02 DO 01131/ 07-Sep-1999 -9,034,223.67
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 432,622.11
08-Od-1999 10.26.35 Eee wiv Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page '27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSO00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 54,857.34
9128272G6 06.250%01/312002 DD 011311 07-SepA999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Sep-1999 8,656,458.90
9128272G6 06.250%0 1/3 120 0 2 DO 01/31/ 07-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 713,689.06
I IF011693 VAR RT 09/012029 23-Sep-1999 -712,206.25
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 1,482.91
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH 10-Sep-1999 713,689.06
II1`011693 VAR RT 09/012029 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6.250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 15-Sep-1999 5,787,109.38
OIN060692 6.00%9/15/2029 21-Sep-1999 -5,658,203.13
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 128,906.25
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
A250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 15-Sep-1999 5,787,109.38
OIN060692 6.000/.9/15/2029 21-Sep-1999 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 20-Sep-1999 1,002,590.00
37042WGKI 6.700%04/302001 DO 042519 23-Sep-1999 -1,019,520.00
S BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK -15,930.00
08-Pet-1999 10.26.35 ar miw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 20-Sep-1999 32,011.11
37042WGKI 6.700%04/30/2001 DD 04/25/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 20-Sep-1999 1,034,601.11
37042WGKI 6.700%04/30/2001 DO 04/2" 23-Sep-1999 0.00
PC BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 20-Sep-1999 1,260,362.50
370425QFO 7.125%05/01/2001 DD 05101/9 23-Sep-1999 -1,283,862.50
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NI -23,500.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 20-Sep-1999 35,130.21
370425QFO 7.125%05/01/2001 DD 05/01/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 20-Sep-1999 1,295,492.71
370425QFO 7.125%05101/2001 DO 05/01/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 23-Scp-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD F N CORP NT 20-Sep4999 959,340.00
441812GF5 6.000%05/01/2004 DD 04/3019 23-Sep-1999 -964,650.00
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC MC,NEW YOR -5,310.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM CORP NT 20-Sep-1999 23,833.33
441812GF5 6.000%05/01/2004 DO 04/30/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26:35 &ecwiw IV"kbeech
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999 -30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 20-Sep-1999 993,173.33
441812GF5 6.000%05/01/2004 DO 04/3019 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 FIRST USA BK NA MTN#SR 0000 20-Sep-1999 994,970.00
33744CAB I 6,125%06/252001 DO 0623N 23-Sep-1999 -999,100.00
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -4,130.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 FIRST USA BK NA MTN#SR 0000 20-Sep4999 15.312.50
33744CABI 6.125%06/252001 DO 0623/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11000,000.00 FIRST USA BK NA MTN#SR 0000 20-Sep-1999 1,010,282.50
33744CAB1 6.125%06252001 DD 0623/9 23-Scp-1999 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 20-Sep4999 1,307,818.80
073902AW8 6.750%05/012001 DD 0426/9 23-Sep-1999 -1,317,619.35
S BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK -9,800.55
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 20-Sep4999 34,745.63
073902AWS 6.750%05/012001 DO 042619 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 20-Sep-1999 1,342,564.43
073902AWS 6.750%05/012001 DD 042619 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC BARCLAYS BANK,NEW YORK 23-Scp-1999 0.00
08-Oc1-1999 10.26.35 amai.Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 20-Sep-1999 2,875,800.00
12560PAZ4 5.910%11/10/2003 DD 11/09/9 23-Sep-1999 -2,900,880.00
S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY -25,080.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 20-Sep-1999 65,502.50
12560PAZ4 5.910%11/102003 DO 11/09/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 20-Sep-1999 2,941,302.50
12560PAZ4 5.910%11/102003 DO 11/09/9 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN 8TR 00343 20-Sep-1999 2,504,300.00
52517PQG9 FLTG RT 0 711 52 0 0 2 DD 07/121 23-Sep-1999 -2,500,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 4,300.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN 8TR 00343 20-Sep-1999 30,974.31
52517PQG9 FLTG RT 07/152002 DO 071121 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN MTR 00343 20-Sep-I999 2,535,274.31
52517PQG9 FLTG RT 07/15/2002 DO 07/12/ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 8TR 00299 20-Sep-1999 2,984,100.00
61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 23-Sep-1999 -2,998.341.00
S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY -14,241.00
08-0cl-1999 10:26:35 Encu&v IPurk&e h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: -31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN kTR 00299 20-Sep-1999 31,850.00
61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN BTR 00299 20-Sep-1999 3,015,950.00
61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 23-Sep-1999 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 27-Scp-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 27-Sep-1999 303,150.00
52517PPQB 8.150%05/152000 DO 10/16/9 30-Sep-1999 -304.350.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ -1,200.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 27-Sep-1999 3.056.25
52517PPQ6 8.150%05/152000 DO 10/16M 30-Sep-1999 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 27-Sep-1999 306,206.25
52517PPQ8 S.150%05/15/2000 DO 10/1619 30-Sep-1999 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 30-Scp-1999 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
79,650.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Aug-1999 -79,650.00
3133TCE95 6.324%09/15/2032 01-Aug-1999 79,737.12
PDC 87.12
08-Oct-1999 10:26:35 Executive ft kbencb
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG00olo00o 01-SEP-1999-3OSEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-79,707.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Aug-1999 79,707.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Aug-1999 -79,794.18
PD .87.18
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-79,707.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CPF E3 A 01-Aug-1999 79,707.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 OI-Aug-1999 0.00
PC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,491.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR%A C 15-Aug-1999 -13,481.54
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO WON 15-Aug-1999 13,481.54
PDC 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR%A C 15-Aug-1999 -13,481.54
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03115/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00
FCC 16-Aug-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,491.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Aug4999 13,481.54
31677EAA4 6.200-/e09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Aug-1999 -13,481.54
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR%A C 15-Aug-1999 13,481-54
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Aug-1999 0.00
PC 14-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,638.60 FHLMC GROUP SGS-0476 01-Sep-1999 400,638.60
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/O1/ 01-Sep-1999 406,898.58
PD .6,259.98
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 Esecutiv¢IVorkb¢nch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: -33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSGo0010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
AOO,638.60 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Sep-1999 400,638.60
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/011 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-44.826.15 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Sep-1999 44,826.15
3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Sep-1999 -44,763.11
PD 63.04
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
A4,826.15 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Sep-1999 44.826.15
3133TO2D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPCR-PIMCO
-27,908.70 GNMA II POOL#0080023 O"CP-1999 27,908.70
36225CAZ9 7.000%12202026 DD 12/011 01-Sep-1999 -28,370.94
PD -462.24
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-27,908.70 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Sep-1999 27,908.70
36225CAZ9 T000%1220/2026 DD 12/01/ 01-Scp-1999 0.00
FC 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-35,051.22 GNMA II POOL N080099M 01-Sep-1999 35,051.22
36225CC20 6.875%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Sep-1999 .35,817.97
PD -766.75
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-35,051.22 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Sep-1999 35,051.22
36225CC20 6.875%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Sep-1999 0.00
FC 20-Sep-1999 0.00
08-0cl-/999 10:26.35 Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,160.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Sep-1999 47,160.50
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Sep-1999 47,212.08
PD -51.59
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,402.12 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Sep-1999 6,402.12
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 0826/9 15-Sep-1999 -6,402.12
PO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6.402.12 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Sep-1999 6,402.12
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 091260 15-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,091.23 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C I5-Sep-1999 13,091.23
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Sep-1999 -13,081.23
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,081.23 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Sep-1999 13,081.23
31677EAA4 6.200"/009/012001 DD 03/15/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
PC 23-Sep-1999 0.00
MATURITIES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2.200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 09-Sep-1999 2,193,352.33
34539UW99 09/09/1999 09-Sep-1999 -2,193,352.33
MT 09-Sep4999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 &x cwiv ft kbe.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 20-Sep-1999 896,476.50
313588LY9 MAT 09/20/1999 20-Sep-1999 -996,476.50
MT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 21-Sep-1999 1,892,300.78
80311BWM9 0921/1999 21-Sep-1999 -1,892,300.78
MT 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-P1MCO
-900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 23-Sep-1999 881,400.00
61166BWPS 09/23/1999 23-Sep-1999 -881,400.00
MT 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 29-Sep-1999 299,030.17
02680KWV6 0929/1999 29-Sep-1999 -299,030.17
MT 29-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,900,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 29-Sep-1999 3,899,646.67
80311 BWV9 0929/1999 29-Sep-1999 -3,888,646.67
MT 29-Sep-1999 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 15-Sep-1999 300 000.00
073902AP3 7.625%09/15/1999 DD 09/21/9 15-Sep-1999 -303,930.00
MT 15-Sep-1999 -3,930.00
INTEREST
08-0ca1999 1026:35 &ecutzw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000I000O 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Aug-1999 657.94
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/15/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00
ITC 16-Aug-1999 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-Sep-1999 0.25
996087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT OI-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FM MTN#SHOO]1 01-Sep-1999 21,125.00
893SOMEPI 8.450%01/122000 DO 01112/9 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 01-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 01-Sep-1999 140,175.00
31364CXV5 6.230%03/012002 DO 03/03/9 OI-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 01-Sep-I999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 749.71
996085247 01-Sey-1999 0.00
IT 03-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-1999 3,480.55
996095247 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 03-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 09-Sep4999 6,647.67
34539UW99 09/09/1999 09-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 09-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26:35 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
57.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CfF E3 A 13-Sep-1999 57.00
3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Aug-1999 0.00
IT 13-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 14-Sep-1999 656.44
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 0311519 15-Aug-1999 0.00
IT 14-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP MTN TR 00039 15-Sep-1999 27,855.00
31808CBQ4 6.190%1020/1999 DD 1020/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Scp-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 15-Scp-1999 11,437.50
073902AP3 7.625%09/15/1999 DO 0921/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 15-Sep-1999 62,270.83
06605TAL6 6.125%03/152002 DO 03/12/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 15-Sep-1999 82,000.00
542671CT7 8.2001/o 0311 52 02 3 DD 032819 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,639.60 FHLMC GROUP OG5-0476 15-Sep-1999 57,663.01
3129DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 Ermoti.Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSO-CONSOGDA7ED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
44,826.15 FULMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-Sep-1999 3,711.29
3133T02DS 5.900%06/152017 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
79,707.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A IS-Sep-1999 17,393.31
3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Aug-1999 0.00
IT I5-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,638.94 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 15-Sep-1999 11,638.94
3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,402.12 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Sep-1999 1,659.86
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 0926/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 15.Sep.1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 17-Sep-1999 42,393.60
37042WVR9 FLTG RT 12/172001 DO 12/15/ 17-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 17-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN STR006 20-Sep-1999 14,751.03
17120QE80 FLTG RT08N82002 DO 04/081 20-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
27,908.70 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-Sep-1999 8,720.79
36225CAZ9 7.000%12202026 DO 121011 01-Sep4999 0.00
IT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
08-0ct-/999 10:26.33 Ewmti.Wo kbeMh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: -39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 20-Sep-1999 3,523.50
313588LY9 MAT 09/20/1999 20-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
35,051.22 GNMA 11 POOL 0080088M 20-Sep-1999 12,011.96
36225CC20 6.875%06202027 DO 06/011 01-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 20-Sep-1999 4,377.67
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 0 511 8 20 0 0 DD 05/I81 IB-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 20-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,900,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 21-Sep-1999 7,699.22
80311BWM9 0921/1999 21-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 21-Sep-1999 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 23-Sep-1999 18,600.00
61166BWPS 0923/1999 23-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,081.23 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 23-Sep-1999 596.79
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 23-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN 24-Sep-1999 55,698.32
44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06242003 DD 06241 24-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 24-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10.26.35 Erecuriw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-SEP-1999-30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 27-Sep-1999 28.750.00
42333HKJO 5.7501/6 09/252001 DO 0925/9 25-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,060,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 27-Sep-1999 10,833.33
3133TDPV2 6.500%09252013 25-AugA999 0.00
IT 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 27-Sep-1999 633,650.00
31364CZY7 6.670%03272002 DO 0327/9 27-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPF-R-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 27-Sep-1999 28,604.72
423328BKS FLTG RT 06252001 DO 06251 25-Sep4999 0.00
IT 27-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 29-Sep4999 969.93
02680KWV6 0929/1999 29-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 29-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,900,DD0.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 29-Sep-1999 11,333.33
80311BWV9 0929/1999 29-Scp-1999 0.00
IT 29-Sep-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 304ep-1999 66,937.50
912827Z54 06.375%09/30/20DI DD 09/30/ 30-Sep-1999 0.00
IT 30-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-1999 10:26:35 Exenam Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '41
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000/0000 01-SEP-1999 -30-SEP-1999
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Scp-1999 30,500.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 01/151 0.00
CD 30-Scp-1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Sep-1999 21,070.00
9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DD 07/151 0.00
CD 30-Sep-1999 0.00
08-Oct-I999 10.26.35 Executive;V ekbemA
FAHR COMMITTEE MOng oxe I Toad.of dr.
10113M 10/D/99
AGENDA REPORT Mm NUMW I Hem Numbe
FaNae¢n lntdr
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services
Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
SUBJECT: SPECIAL DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND COUNTY OF ORANGE TO SEWER URBAN RUNOFF
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify the decision of the General Manager and authorize him to waive the Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC), pursuant to District's Ordinance No. OCSD 99-01,
Section 305.6, regarding issuance of the Special Purpose Discharge Permits to the City
of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to allow urban runoff to be discharged to
the District's wastewater system for a one-year period effective November 1, 1999.
SUMMARY
The City of Huntington Beach (City) and County of Orange (County)operate four pump stations
at various locations in the City of Huntington Beach. The pump stations collect urban runoff,
and in the past discharged to the Talbert Channel, which flows into the Pacific Ocean. On
August 30, 1999, as part of the ongoing investigation of the shoreline contamination, the District
agreed to reroute the flow from the four pump stations to the sewer system. The dry weather
flow from the pump station is estimated to be 800,000 to 1,000,000 gallons per day (gpd).
Recent analyses of the discharge have shown that the runoff does not contain any constituents
at levels in violation of the District's discharge limits and prohibitions.
Preliminary results of the beach closure investigation suggest that the runoff from the pump
stations discharging to the Talbert Channel may have contributed to the cause of the recent
shoreline contamination. To mitigate the impact of the discharges, in accordance with Sections
203 and 305 of the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01, the District plans to issue Special
Purpose Discharge (SPD) permits to the City and the County to allow the discharges from the
above-mentioned pump stations to the sewer system. The SPD permits will be issued for
discharges during summer or winter dry weather conditions, starting November 1, 1999, for a
period of one year. As part of the permit conditions, the City and County will be required to
measure the flow, BOD and TSS, and provide these measurements to the District on a monthly
basis. In addition, the City and County will be required to implement provisions to interrupt
discharge to the sewer system on an emergency basis, especially during high-flow storm events
when there is a potential for the capacity of the sewer system to be exceeded.
In accordance with District's Ordinance Nos. OCSD-01 and OCSD-10, the District plans to
charge the City and County for the actual operations and maintenance (O&M) cost associated
with the discharges from the pump stations. The O&M charge is calculated at approximately
$420 per million gallons per day, based on the District's current understanding of the urban
runoff characteristics. However, the District proposes that the Capital Facility Capacity
Charges (CFCC)for the discharge from the pump stations to the sewer system be waived. As
per District's Ordinance OCSD-09, applying the full CFCC is estimated at$660 per day per
million gallons.
\Ya3„bY1Yrp.JM1\pY,N1BnN/ywga flpY4\1GC9 Qora/.ieMa Fegx6�l�Msn 11�E�tlX
Page 1
Staff recommends that the CFCC be waived for one year during the term of the SPD permits,
because staff is planning to work with the City, County and others to develop long-term
solutions to mitigate the negative impact of these discharges on the shoreline, which have
resulted in the recent beach closures. At this time, the only practical alternative available to the
City and County is to discharge the flow from the pump stations to the sewer system.
To avoid confusion or misunderstanding and to allow for the "waiver", the staff is concurrently
recommending the amendment of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 by deleting the reference to
"Special Purpose Discharge Permit" as part of the mandatory imposition of a CFCC. The
provisions in existing Ordinance OCSD-01 (Section 305.6)will still allow for the imposition of a
CFCC in any given rase, at the discretion of the General Manager. As noted above, in this
rase it is the staff recommendation that the CFCC not be imposed and staff seeks the Boards'
concurrence with the decision of the General Manager.
Since the decision to sewer the urban runoff from the pump stations was made to mitigate the
potential impact on the environment and public health, staff recommends that the City and
County be granted a waiver of the CFCC for a period of only one year. Following one year of
discharge, the project will be re-evaluated.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
1Vtlm`NdIYq. A"p Rl 11WB W Apemh Ryob110diJMn 14(0W
Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE Mee ngD&e To ad.orar.
10/13/99 10/27/99
AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbv ftemNumba
14(e)
Fm Numa 1Ne)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: PAY STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-18, Amending Human Resources Policies and
Procedures, Resolution No. OCSD 99-33 Relating to 1)Adjust the Assistant
General Manager's pay range (E20) maximum from $136,680 to $148,836;
2) Move the Director of Information Technology classification from pay range E17
($75,876-$119,784) to pay range E18 ($85,992-$139,464); 3) Move the
Warehouse Supervisor classification from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236) to
pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156); 4) Move the Contracts & Purchasing
Supervisor classification from pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156) to pay range El
($60,828-$86,064); 5) Create Contracts Specialist classification at pay range E2
($39,252-$55,488); 6) Create Contracts Administrator classification at pay range
E7 ($50,064-$70,848); 7) Reinstate the Safety and Emergency Response
Specialist classification at pay range E8 ($52,500-$74,292); and 8) Create
Information Technology Strategic Implementation Leader classification at pay
range E11 ($60,828-$86,064).
SUMMARY
From time to time, pay structures need to be adjusted. Pay structure
adjustments include the increase of pay ranges, the movement of classifications
to different pay ranges, and the development or elimination of classifications.
Structure adjustments are usually made in response to changes in the external
market or in response to internal organizational changes. Staff has identified
eight areas of the exempt pay structure in need of modification. The proposed
structure adjustments will not result in any individual salary increases. The
recommended modifications are as follows:
1. The pay range maximum for the Assistant General Manager (AGM)
position ($136,660) is currently$3,300 per year less than the highest-level
department head pay range maximum ($139,980). It is recommended that
the AGM's pay range maximum be raised to $148,836, or 6.3% above the
department head pay range, to eliminate the inequity that exists between
the AGM pay range and the department head pay range.
2. In June of 1999, an Executive Management Salary Survey was
conducted. The results of the survey showed the average market rate for
the position of Director of Information Technology at $123,660. The
gMtlBaN A�Hpw %IMB MAWW PM ��WWlxn tN�tex
m Page 1
a
w
`r
maximum of the District's pay range for that position is $119,784. The
average market rate for the Director of Information Technology is above
the maximum of the District's pay range for that position. It is
recommended that the position be moved from pay range E17, with a
maximum of$119,784, to pay range E18, with a maximum of$139,464 so
that the incumbent's salary may, in the future, be allowed to advance
toward market.
3. All incumbents classified in supervisory classifications at the District are
expected to perform comparable level of duties including planning and
administering approved budget allocations, hiring, evaluating and
disciplining staff, and recommending dismissal of staff when necessary.
The supervisory classifications fall into pay ranges E9 to El with the
exception of the Warehouse Supervisor classification, which falls into pay
range E4. To create internal equity between the Warehouse Supervisor
classification and all of the other supervisory classifications, it is
recommended that the Warehouse Supervisor classification be moved
from pay range E4 ($43,248-$61,236)to pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156).
4,5,6. Approximately two years ago, the Purchasing Division took over many
contract management duties formerly performed by Woodruff, Spradlin &
Smart. Due to the exceptional increase in the District's reliance on
outsourcing of services, consultant contracting, and insurance & bond
review and the recent reorganization of public works from Engineering to
Purchasing, it is recommended that:
A. The Contracts/Purchasing Supervisor classification be moved
from pay range E9 ($55,212-$78,156)to El ($60,828-$86,064)
to recognize the higher-level contract management duties and
to bring the position to the pay range of other comparable
classifications.
B. A Contracts Specialist classification be created at pay range E2
($39,252-$55,488)to support the contract management function
as there are no existing classifications comparable to this
proposed classification. The average market rate for a Contracts
Specialist, according to the 1999/2000 Watson Wyatt Data
Services Salary Survey, is$47,000. The midpoint, or market
reference point, of pay range E2 is $47,364. Please see the
attached classification description, Attachment 1.
C. A Contracts Administrator classification be created at pay range
E7 ($50,064-$70,848) to support the contract management
function as there are no existing classifications comparable to
this proposed classification. The average market rate for a
Contracts Administrator, according to the 1999/2000 Watson
w,..e. erevoe Page 2
Y1
Wyatt Data Services Salary Survey, is $60,300. The midpoint,
or market reference point, of pay range E7 is $60,456. Please
see the attached classification description, Attachment 2.
7. In July of 1997, the requirements of the Safety and Emergency Specialist
position were modified to include Professional Engineering Registration.
As a result, the incumbent was reclassified to Engineer and the Safety and
Emergency Specialist classification was deleted from the salary schedule.
The requirements of the position have been modified once again;
Professional Engineering Registration is no longer a requirement of the
position. It is recommended, therefore, that the Safety and Emergency
Specialist classification be re-instated at its original pay range E8
($52,500-$74,292). Please see the attached classification description,
Attachment 3.
B. Finally, a new classification of Information Technology(IT) Strategic
Implementation Leader is being proposed at pay range El ($60,828-
$86,064). The new classification is necessary to slot up to three
individuals who are critical to the IT strategic development of the
organization and who have unique understanding of District processes,
procedures, and proprietary software training. Without the position at level
Ell, we cannot retain our IT project leaders. Please see the attached
classification description, Attachment 4, as well as an Internet article on
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Attachment 5.
The Salary Schedule has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and
is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 6.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
This item has not been budgeted.
Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
RMp.OYbRmMe.A Rsv IM wiJ�peMaReyLL�Igprywn��IOr he
R,,;,,, � Page 3
k
ATTACHMENTS
1. Contracts Specialist classification description.
2. Contracts Administrator classification description.
3. Safety and Emergency Response Specialist classification description.
4. IT Strategic Implementation Leader classification description.
5. Internet article on Enterprise Resource Planning Systems.
6. Salary Schedule with recommended modifications.
H1 ld� 4 Rep IiMB MAppMe�\1lVAbm 14(e)Jx
R.v � Page 4
A11ALWIEN'1' 1
No. 1416
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Contracts Specialist Page: 1 of 2
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
Under general direction, manages projects in coordination with staff, legal counsel, and outside
contractors. Participates in the development and fulfillment of contract requirements in accordance with
Districts' policies and local, state and federal regulations. The work requires knowledge of the concepts,
practices and procedures of contract administration. The work is reviewed by the Contracts and
Purchasing Supervisor at critical points of assigned projects for soundness of technical analysis and to
determine if desired overall objectives and deadlines have been achieved.
EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
Performs activities concerned with contracts, service agreements, grants, proposals and bids for
purchase or sale of equipment, materials, products or services in a multi-department organization
participating in engineering, construction, maintenance, research and testing, quality control,
computerization/automation, chemical procurement, and specialized professional services.
Reviews and/or prepares bids, contract stipulations, process specifications, liability and insurance
requirements, bonds, and faithful performance warranties and assures conformity and compliance with
District's policies, procedures, and service provision expectations.
Reviews contract content including material, equipment, and/or service costs, performance
requirements, compliance with insurance and bonding requirements and delivery schedules to ensures
completeness and accuracy.
Coordinates and approves contract change orders, amendments, addendums and extensions.
Advises departments of contractual rights and obligations under approved terms and conditions.
Negotiates contracts with vendors, direct contract purchases, and interface with service providers to
expedite timely completion of contract agreements.
Maintains comprehensive contractual records and periodically monitors progress of all goods and
service agreements, from inception through completion, to enforce milestones, deliverables and post-
contract warranties.
Formalizes contract and purchasing process through development of Standard Operating Procedures
manual.
No. 1416
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Contracts Specialist Page: 2 of 2
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
BS in related field. Two years of related experience. Understanding of contract administration
principles and associated legal requirements and engineering/construction contract administration.
Experience in soliciting bids and proposals. Strong verbal and written communication skills. Excellent
computer skills including recent use of MS Office programs and preferably JDEdwards FIS experience.
LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
None
DM 10/99
H:Iwp.dtaUA5101mckinley%ClassDescriptionslFI NANCEIcontrspec.ID.doc
ATTACHMENT 2
n No. 1414
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Contracts Administrator Page: 1 of 2
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
Under general direction, manages Public Works projects in coordination with Engineering staff, legal
counsel, and outside contractors. Participates in the development and fulfillment of contract
requirements in accordance with Districts' policies and local, state and federal regulations. The work
requires advanced knowledge of the concepts, practices and procedures of contract administration. The
work is reviewed by the Contracts and Purchasing Supervisor at critical points of assigned projects for
soundness of technical analysis and to determine if desired overall objectives and deadlines have been
achieved.
EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
Performs activities concerned with contracts, service agreements, grants, proposals and bids for
purchase or sale of equipment, materials, products or services in a multi-department organization
participating in engineering, public works construction, maintenance, research and testing, quality
control, computerization/automation, chemical procurement, and specialized professional services.
Reviews and/or prepares bids, contract stipulations, process specifications, liability and insurance
requirements, bonds, and faithful performance warranties and assures conformity and compliance with
District's policies, procedures, and service provision expectations.
Reviews, approves and administers contract content including material, equipment, and/or service
costs, performance requirements, compliance with insurance and bonding requirements, liquidated
changes and delivery schedules to ensures completeness and accuracy.
Coordinates, approves and administers contract change orders, amendments, addendums, extensions,
stop notices and releases and close-out agreements.
Advises departments of contractual rights and obligations under approved terms and conditions and
resolves dispute resolutions of parties.
Negotiates contracts with vendors, direct major contract purchases, and interface with service providers
to expedite timely completion of contract agreements.
Maintains comprehensive contractual records and periodically monitors progress of all goods and
service agreements, from inception through completion, to enforce milestones, deliverables and post-
contract warranties.
n No. 1414
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANrrATION DismcTs OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Contracts Administrator Page: 2 of 2
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
BS in related field. Four years of related experience. Understanding of engineering/construction and
public works contract administration, contract administration principles and knowledge of legal
requirements for public works and capital projects. Experience in soliciting bids and proposals. Strong
verbal and written communication skills. Excellent computer skills including recent use of MS Office
programs and preferably JDEdwards FIS experience.
LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
None
DM 10/99
H:\wp.dta\hr\510Mckinley\ClassDescriptions\FINANCE\wntmdmin.jD.doc
ATTACHMENT 3
n No. 8212
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE SPECIALIST Page: 1 of 2
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
Under general direction, develops and administers safety and emergency response programs in
accordance with Districts' policies and local, state and federal regulations on occupational health and
safety and environmental management of hazardous substances. The work requires technical
knowledge of safety, industrial hygiene, environmental engineering and regulatory compliance. The
work is reviewed by the Safety Manager at critical points of assigned projects for soundness of
technical analysis and to determine If desired overall objectives and deadlines have been achieved.
EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
Develops and implements a Hazardous Substances Management Program including policies and
procedures for storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, for waste
minimization and pollution control. Investigates and provides technical support on hazardous
substance spills, site assessments and remediation projects. Based on findings, recommends
corrective or preventive action to control or eliminate risks.
Develops and implements an Integrated Emergency Response Program. Obtains the resources to
effectively respond to an emergency or disaster, including equipment and supplies as well as consulting
support during the development of the program. In conjunction with the Safety Manager, prepares and
presents program recommendations to the Board for approval. In the event of an emergency, acts as
incident commander to direct and coordinate actions of Districts' personnel to mitigate releases and
spills.
Represents the Districts with other agencies such as the Orange County Emergency Management
Organization, local fire agencies and the Orange County Healthcare Agency to coordinate hazard
substance, emergency response and disaster preparedness programs, to develop interagency mutual
aid agreements and to share information for the purpose of improving compliance.
Reviews Federal, State and Local proposed and existing hazardous substance, emergency response
and disaster preparedness related legislation for impact on Districts' programs. Prepares and provides
comments on proposed regulations on behalf of the Districts.
Provides administrative and technical direction in the development of other Health and Safety
programs. Provides input and support to Districts' safety meetings. Acts as a resource to Districts'
personnel on safety and emergency response issues. Maintains required hazardous substance,
emergency response and disaster preparedness related documentation.
No. 8212
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISPRICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE SPECIALIST Page: 2 of 2
Develops program objectives for and designs and conducts employee training programs on handling,
storage and transportation of hazardous substances, IERP and other employee safety programs to
promote employee sensitivity to safe working conditions and practices, emergency preparedness and
proper use of safety equipment. Develops and/or recommends the purchase of training materials.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
BS in Safety, Industrial Hygiene or related field or equivalent experience. Five years experience in
safety and health program development and regulatory compliance; HAZWOPER and FEMA/OES
training. Strong verbal and written communication skills; broad knowledge of CAL-OSHA, OSHA and
EPA regulations and fire codes; proficient with PC-based software including spreadsheet and word
processing and data base. Proven leadership skills in the event of an emergency.
LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
None
DM 10199
H:\wp.dta\hn510Mckinley\ClassDescdptions\H RISFTYSPEC.PD
ATTACHMENT 4
No. 5111
Date: 10/27/99
Revised:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Information Technology Strategic Implementation Leader Page: I of I
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
Under general direction, manages IT projects in coordination with staff and outside contractors.
Participates in the development and fulfillment of contract requirements in accordance with District
policies and local, state and federal regulations. The work requires knowledge of the concepts,
practices and procedures of project management and contract administration. Responsible for the
strategic direction of projects like the Financial Information System (FIS).
EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
For assigned projects, defines projects in terms of project goals, scope of work, resources needed,
manpower requirements, schedules and budgets.
Prepares job plans and related documents.
Organizes and coordinates the implementation of assigned projects, identifies project participates,
identifies and assigns tasks and resources required for each task and establishes project milestones.
Participates in the selection of contractors for outside services when required.
Evaluates technologies and processes, reviews and evaluates research reports, technical literature,
performs process and economic calculations and makes recommendations to management.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Bachelor's degree in related field and five years of related experience. Proven leadership skills.
Experience in soliciting bids and proposals. Strong verbal and written communication skills. Excellent
computer skills including recent use of MS Office programs and preferably JD Edwards FIS experience.
LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
None
ATTACHMENT 5
GUIDE TO ENTERPRISE COMPUTING
Government Out of the Box
Long a fixture for business, all-in-one
enterprise resource planning systems are
beginning to move into the public sector.
BY ELLEN PERLMAN
httolhvww.noveminn.toMTem.h[m
It doesn't take a million-dollar software package to
make sure school buses get regular oil changes. But keeping the big yellow buses
lumbering around the Houston Independent School District is just one of dozens of
maintenance tasks that must be done regularly,and tracking all of that work has gotten a lot
easier since the district began using its new computerized management system last
September.
The Houston schools' high-tech system does much more than keep the buses running.
School officials can find out, up to the minute,how much money they have remaining in
thew budgets.Cafeteria managers no longer have to send out their lunch menus three weeks
in advance and stack inventory for long periods oftime;they now can order on Monday for
the next week's pizza and lunch-meat delivery.The process for paying vendors and logging
payments received has become smoother and easier.
Before the new system went online, the school district struggled with archaic computer
systems that had been put in place in 1983. Most information was disseminated on paper,
which was time-consuming and made it difficult to track transactions and activities.
Because budgeting was highly centralized and it would take five days to get a paper copy
of spending activity,individual schools were forced to keep their own"shadow"budgets.It
would do no good to see on paper that there was$800 left to spend when three requisitions
remained in transit in the system.
Then the Houston school district discovered that its financial system was not going to make
it through the millennium:It was not Year 2000 compliant Instead of trying to upgrade the
old programs,officials decided to spend$8 million for software and consulting services to
install an "enterprise-wide" system. The new system puts PCs on principals' desks,
connects individual schools with central offices and allows principals to take over the
business of managing and ro ming their individual schools better. The district now has
much more efficient systems-systems that communicate with each other—for inventory
management,preventive maintenance,financials,funds management,and accounts payable
and receivable. School employees can tap into a mother lode of information on thew own
PCs.
That ability to connect departments and functions electronically order one system bas
increasing appeal not just for school systems bra for many cities, counties and states that
one implementing or considering, what bas come to be known in the past few years as
"enterprise resource planning," or ERP. No matter how disparate the constituents or
programs, certain activities take place in all agencies. Employees have to be paid, goods
' have to be purchased and funds have to be managed.
Private-sector companies have been installing ERP systems for decades. In the past few
years, governments have bean getting into the game, buying ERP packages to do general
ledger, payroll, budgeting, accounting and asset management. In 1999, governments
accounted for 3.7 percent of meal industry licensing revenues, according to the market
research firm AMR Research Inc.
Governments of all sizes have been investing in enterprise systems, from Tuolumne
County,California,and Boulder County,Colorado, to the states of Florida and Louisiana.
A large growth arm is in mid-size governments with operating budgets of$100 million or
so and 500 to 1,000 employees.The vendors most prevalent in the government market are
J.D. Edwards, Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP, which supplied the Houston school district's
system.
Like the Houston schools, many government EPP purchasers have been motivated by the
Year 2000 problem. But even without the looming specter of Y2K failures, many
government officials know that systems put in place in the 1970s and 1980s are nearing or
have surpassed their useful lives, don't manipulate or share data well, and need to be
replaced. Technology has changed so rapidly in recent years that they are fording they are
being held back by cumbersome legacy technologies, particularly as they look to do
business on the Web.
INFORMATION MINING
Experts in the field of information technology caution that enterprise-wide systems are not
for everyone. Governments should think long and hard and analyze what thew needs are
before jumping in and buying these new systems, which can be expensive and time-
consuming to implement and maintain. Bringing an ERP system online can take from six
months to two years."There are a lot of nightmare stories in the market about the amount
of time it takes to implement and the costs,"says Ellen Zidar,a senior research analyst with
GarmerGroup,an information technology research and consulting company.
But them also can be a tremendous amount of benefit to the systems. Users can mine for
information more quickly and easily even across department lines. Governments can
reduce or eliminate duplicative tasks such as keying in names and addresses in one agency
that have already been input by another. And these systems can analyze and use stored
information in a way mainframes are unable to.For instance,if there is a huge upward blip
in expenditures in an agency,there are tools to analyze why. With a mainframe system, a
department manager typically has in request a financial report that can take days to arrive.
It might take several reports to figure out where the unusual expenditure was. The new
system can drill down to a detailed level within minutes.
In the past few years, enterprise software companies have started catering to government,
modifying thew products to adapt them to governments' particular needs. Before that
process began, governments that implemented such systems bought a product created for
the commercial sector and adapted it themselves. "A lot of governments are stuck with
software primarily designed for business that was modified in handle the eccentrichies of
government," says John Sobleskie, deputy chief financial officer in the Wayne County,
Michigan,Department of Environmental Operations.
Kansas started using enterprise-wide software in 1995 and had to make about Z500
modifications to the system to reflect the public-sector environment. Since that initial
installation,Kansas has upgraded its package to a government-specific version,which has
enabled the state to keep subsequent modifications to a minimum. The state pays annual
maintenance fees to its vendors and receives upgrades as they are released.
I
The text trend on the horizon is toward incorporating Web technology into enterprise-wide
systems. That, for instance, would enable traveling government employees to access
needed data or do expense reports from the road. Citizens and businesses could get
licenses, pay taxes, check invoices or the states of payments on a system that integrates
information from may agencies. Texas school districts are able to go onto the Web,plug
in a password and request money from the Texas Education Agency,which began using an
enterprise-wide system in 1997.
At the other end of the implementation scale, many governments have been postponing
decisions on large new computer projects, concentrating instead on making it through the
year 2000 intact. That waiting game, which a lot of businesses have been playing as well,
has contributed to some slowdown in the market for enterprise systems. But as in Houston,
the Y2K specter has also worked the other way, contributing to some governments'
decisions to buy the systems in the late 1990s.
The millennium bug was one of the factors in Montana's decision several years ago to
spend $16.5 million for the hardware, software and implementation for an ERP system.
The state rolled out the first phase--budget development—in August 1999,and added asset
management two months later, In May of this year,the state cut the first paychecks for its
12,000 employees from the new human resources component.
Previously, government managers in Montana had to cope with a lot of different systems
that operated in disjointed ways. For instance, the state had several different computer
systems for processing the purchase of an automobile. One took care of the purchase
transaction.Another paid the vendor.A thud recorded the purchase on the books as a fixed
use.Each system was developed by and for the individual agencies,and at different times.
They did not share information readily with each other,and the financial information from
the separate systems often conflicted.The new software from PeopleSoft takes care of the
whole process as one on the same system. "It reduces data entry and reduces the errors of
data entry,"says David Ashley,project director for Montana's system.
Another plus for Montana is that agency employees develop skills that are easily
transferable between agencies since they all learn to use the same computer system. An
employee from the purchasing department, for example, no longer enters a whole new
world if he takes ajob with accounts payable.
RISKS AND COMPLEXITIES
At the same time as they look at the benefits of these systems, governments have to be
careful to look at the risks and the complexities. Some governments have made purchase
decisions without expending the effort to figure out just what it is they want out of such a
system—a recipe for disappointment down the road. "It's management by magazine
cover," says Robert Charette, president of ITABHI Corp., a Spotsylvania, Virginia,
consulting company specializing in managing business and technology risks for
governments and telecommunications companies."They say, 'Everyone is doing it, so we
ought to have ERP.'It's being touted as the cure for the common cold."
A lot of what a government wants to get out of an ERP system might be accomplished with
policy changes or management decisions reorganizing the way jobs are performed,
Chwette believes. Even when an enterprise-wide system is the answer,the actual hardware
and software are only pieces of a much larger project. More important is how, and how
much, governments plan to change their operations so they mesh with the new computer
system.
Governments planning to move to ERP have to thoroughly analyze what they are doing
now and understand bow the new system would achieve the same results.Or they have to
decide to change the way they do business to match the way the new system Works. The
option is available to customize the new system so it mimics the old way of doing things,
but it often doesn't make sense to highly modify the software and then have to do it all over
again in 18 months when the vendor comes our with an upgrade. "It's important not to
modify unless you have to,"says Don Heiman,chief information technology officer in the
Kansas Department of Administration."It's much better to stay vanilla."
But running a software package in a pure-vanilla state is usually not possible. Most
governments have unique requirements, such as a legislative mandate or a personnel
provision that a union bargained for. In large part due to the customization involved, the
first time Kansas went through an upgrade to its enterprise software, it took a year and
Heiman's entire 10-person staff to install the new version at the same time it had to
maintain the old.
In Wayne County, the road maintenance department has worked for years with a custom-
designed off-line system that tracks the deparhnent's costs. When the new J.D. Edwards
enterprise system was proposed, the department insisted on using a lot of the existing
system's procedures odes and numbers it was used to.The county and the vendor had to
figure out how to configure the system the best way to accommodate those needs."It took a
significant amount of time to meet the requirements of the road department and convince
them this was going to do the job for them,"says Sobleskie.But he is enthusiastic about the
benefits that will come down the road.
BUILDING ON WORKFLOW
The enterprise system that the Texas Education Agency began using two years ago has
vastly improved the efficiency of the organization, according to Bill Monroe, chief of
operations. It has enabled an agency that was downsized from 1,200 people to 800 to
administer$12 billion in funds and manage an $18 billion stock and bond portfolio. But
only about a third of the effort to implement the Texas agency project came from the
computer programmers.The rest fell on accounting,purchasing and other staff people who
were going to use it.
The system is built on electronic workflow.Employees previously had systems that did not
communicate.Therefore,with the new system,they had to figure out who was going to get
what in the electronic process and how to set up the system accordingly."They have to get
together and decide a common language on how they're going to operate," Monroe says.
"There are an awful lot of decisions that have to be made."
Although the Texas Education Agency did that painstaking work, it still ended up giving
itself a grade of C for knowing what the roles and responsibilities of everyone using the
system were going to be when the system went live,Monroe says. When the system finally
came online, for instance, the agency wasn't sure whose job it was to process all the
purchase orders to move them to accounts payable. "The tools were all there, but the
implementation was so fast,"says Monroe."There was not so much focus on how we were
going to use the tools."
The agency also gave itself a C for not being ready with a'perf r mance tuning team"when
the system went live. If 100 people happened to request financial information at the same
time, the response was not as quick as people expected. While the agency could not have
foreseen that kind of performance issue,it should have had people ready to deal with such
problems,Momroe thinks."We didn't know to have a performance tuning team ready,"he
says."We didn't understand we needed to tune."
Other parts of the Texas agency's implementation fared better. In areas such as
contingency planning and bringing in an "all star" team of technicians to implement the
system,for example,the agency gave itself grades of B+and A+,respectively.
I
RICH AND POOR
Because so much investigation into a government's business processes is required for a
successful ERP implementation, it takes the average governmental organization about a
year from when the analysis begins to when a decision is made to go forward with a
project.
When the implementation goes forward, there is both a'fich mans"and a"poor man's"
approach,says Ashley in Montana.Under the rich man's approach, there is enough project
money to hire people to implement and run the system full-time. The advantage is that
government employees don't have to be pulled off their regular jobs or try to do two jobs at
once.
With the poor man's approach, existing government employees are used as much as
possible to implement the new system, maintain it, and train other workers in its use. The
advantage, besides cost savings, is that employees are sensitive to the needs of their
agencies and can improve how the system is implemented. In addition, employees have a
chance to become as knowledgeable on the new system n they were on the legacy system
right from the start,positioning them to return to their home agencies to utilize the system
and help others. In Montana, 10 different agencies contributed 32 state employees to serve
on the implementation project,and the agencies continued to pay their salaries.
That kind of freeing of resources can be hard to do, however. Wayne County started
replacing its clunky old systems with the enterprise-wide package in January 1998. But
implementation is going slower than county officials thought it would. They originally
expected it to be finished October 1,but they didn't have enough people with enough time
to meet that goal. The people helping to implement the system also are continuing to do
their regular jobs."I didn't have the manpower to take people off and throw them on this
and do nothing else,"Sobleskie says.
Whether the rich man's or poor man's approach is used, few governments have the
resources to do the entire job themselves. Most of the time, they will have to look to a
systems integrator to manage the implementation job. Governments also have to take into
account ongoing maintenance costs. Even in the commercial world, which has been doing
this a lot longer than the government sector and often has more money to spend on
technical staff,companies are finding they can't maintain the systems on their own. "It's a
hot technology for outsourcing,"says GarmerGroup's Zidar.
But governments that have made it through the arduous process of getting an enterprise.
wide system in place, such ar the school district in Houston,have been only too happy to
bid goodbye to the old, inefficient ways of doing things. "It was a lot of work," says the
school district's controller,Melinda Gatrah,'butit was worth the price."
Copyright 01999,Congressional Quarterly.Ina.
Reproduction in any form without the written permission
of the publisher is prohibited.Governing and
City&State are registered trademarks
of Congressional Quarterly,Inc.
Attachment 6
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Aominlstrabw and Clerical
E%hibltA
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Status
1019 44,650 55.628 Information Services Technician III Non-Exempt
1017 41,714 51,940 Financial Technician Non-Exempt
1015 40,605 50,540 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt
1013 38,436 47,840 Senior Storeskeeper Non-Exempt
1012 38,933 48,476 Administrative Assistant Nan-Exempt
1011 37,906 47,189 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt
1011 37,906 47,189 Information Services Technician II Non-Exempt
1008 34.382 42,800 Information Services Technician I Non-Exempt
1007 33.444 41,644 Secretary Non-Exempt
1004 31,878 39,691 Senior Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
1004 31,878 39,691 Senior OMce Aide NomExempt
1003 31,680 39,424 Sloreskeaper NomExempt
1002 29,370 36,556 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
1002 29,370 36,556 Office Ake Non-Exempt
1002 29,370 36,556 OMce Specialist Non-Exempt
1001 26,308 32,770 Office Techniclan Non-Exempt
904 14,466 30,164 Storeskeeper Assistant Nan-Exempt
903 14,468 24.812 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt
1mrM Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Engineering
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Cbssificatlons FLEA Sbtus
1025 49,866 62,090 Senior Constmobon lnspe r Non-Ecempl
1023 47,526 59.174 Engineenng Assodab Non-Exempt
1020 45,621 56.786 ConstWion lnspecbr Nan-Exempt
1015 40.606 50,540 Engineer Aide III Non-Exempt
1009 36.893 45.935 Engineering Me It Non-Exempt
1006 33,228 41,355 Engineenng Aide l Non-Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Clasa10catlons By Employee Group
Technical Services
pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications IFLEA BMWs
1018 43,476 54,134 Environmental Specialist ll Non-Exempt
1018 43,476 64,134 Source Control Inspector ll Non-Exempt
1018 43,476 54,134 Senior Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
1010 37,134 46,249 Emironmenlel Specialist l Non-Exempt
1010 37,134 46,249 Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
1010 37,134 46,249 Source Control Inspector l Non-Exempt
1005 32,552 40,533 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt
nree Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Operations and Maintenance(501)
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
2015 44,571 55,504 Lead Electrical Technician Non-Exempt
2015 44,571 55,504 Lead Instrumentation Technician Non-Exempt
2014 42,M7 52,549 Electrical Technician ll Non-Exemyl
2014 42,207 52,549 Instrumentation Technician II Non-Exempt
2013 40,775 50.776 Lead Mechanic Non-Exempt
2013 40,n5 50.776 Pump Power Operator Non-Exempt
2013 40,T75 50,776 Senior Plant Operator Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Machinist Non-Exempt
2011 39,304 48,949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt
2011 39,304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt
2010 39,040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47285 Budder Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,286 Electrical Technician l Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Instrumentation Technician 1 Non-Exempt
2008 37,737 46,973 Plant Operator Non-Exempt
2007 34,605 42,959 Electrical Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,605 42,959 Instrumentation Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Painter Non-Exempt
2007 34,605 42,969 Senior Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exemix
2006 33,590 41,812 Mechanic Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39,040 Colecion Factl'Nes Worker II Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39,040 Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2004 30,938 38,509 Operator In Training Non-Exempt
2003 29,875 37,207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt
2002 29,490 36,700 Control Center Clerk Non-Exempt
2001 24,184 30,093 Collection Facilities Worker I Non-Exempt
20M 22,582 28,502 Helper Non-Exempt
m.m Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Professional
Rage Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Status
E14 $70,380 $99,600 Chief Scientist Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Assistant to the General Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Senior Engineer Exempt
E12 $63,948 $90,468 Senior Scientist Exempt
E12 $63.948 $90.468 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt
Ell $60.828 $86.064 Engineer Exempt
Ell $60,828 -_ $86,054 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt-
E10 $57.852 $81.948 Secretary to the Board of Directors Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Protect Specialist Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt
E9 555.212 $78,156 Scientist Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Accountant Exempt
E9 555,212 $78,158 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt
E8 $62.500 $74,292 Associate Engineer III Exempt
E8 $52,500 $74,292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt
__.
ES 552,500 '..' $7/.292- Safety S.Emergency Response Specialist .Exempt
E7 $5D,064 $70,848 Programmer Analyst Exempt
E7 $50,064 $70,848 Computer Hardware Specialist NomExempt
E7 $WOU $70,848 Telecommunications Specialist Non-Exempt
E7 $50.06'1 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt
E7 &0 064 $70,848 comma.Administrator 'Exempt _... :
EB 547,640 $67,392 Principal Laboratory B Research Analyst Exempt
E6 $47,640 $67.392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt
E5 $46,396 $54,212 Associate Engineer II Exempt
E5 $45.3% $64.212 Senior Accountant Exempt
E5 $45.396 $64.212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt
ES $46,396 $54,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt
E5 $45,396 $64.212 Senior Environmental Specialist Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61,236 Safety Representative Exempt
E4 543,248 $61.236 Programmer Exempt
E4 543,248 $81,236 Senior Buyer Exempt
E3 $41,136 $58,280 Associate Engineer I Exempt
Qss ,2b2 . 455,488� ,C'onaeas Speaalbt -_ ` Exempt- _...'
El $37.284 $52.908 Accountant Exempt
--
El $37,284 $52.908 Buyer Exempt
El $37,284 $52,908 Financial Analyst Exempt
E1 $37.284 $52,908 Management Analyst Exempt
m re Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Supervisory
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA SbWe
E14 570.380 $99,6W Engineering Supervisor Exempt
E13 567.128 $9e,932 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt
E12 563,948 $90,468 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt
Ell 560,828 586,064 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 E86,054 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 586.064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60.828 $86,064 Contracts B Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,1% Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Operations Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78,1W Source Control Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78,156 Supervising Construction inspector Exempt
EA S54211 S28?66 Contracts S Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt
64 $43�24. $61.i36 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt
uuaAe
imrm Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Management
Pay
Range Mlnimum Maximum Cleaai8eatione FLEA Status
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt
E16 $77.688 $109.812 Engineering Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109.812 Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring Manager Exempt
E16 $77.608 $109,812 Laboratory Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109.812 Source Control Manager Exempt
EIS 573,956 $104.616 Controller Exempt
E15 $73.956 $104.616 Financial Manager Exempt
E1S $73.956 $104.616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt
E16 $73,956 $104.616 Contracts$Purchasing Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Safety/Emergency Response Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Maintenance Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 Human Resources Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Operations Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Information Technology Manager Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Executive Management
Pay
Rang. Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Sb1us
E27 $154,596 $154,596 General Manager Exempt
E20 $95.676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt
E20 $95,676 5738Ai80 Assistant General Manager Exempt
E19 $87.180 5739.980 Director of Engineering Exempt
E19 $87.180 $139,980 Director of Operations B Maintenance Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of Technical Services Exempt
E18 $85.992 $139.464 Director of Finance Exempt
E16 $85.902 $139,464 Director of Information Technobgy Exempt
W SS,Az6 Su6.784 Director of Information Technology Exempt
E17 $75,676 $119.794 Director of Human Resources Exempt
E13 $67.128 594,932 Director of Communications Exempt
emro Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Confidential
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Slatua
1027 -62.551 52.978 Executive Assistant ll Nor Exempt
1012 38.933 48.076 Executive Assistant l NonExempt
1012 38.933 48,476 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
"Non-Regular'Part Time
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classigeatlons FLSA Status
905 15,720 33,29D Intern NOn-Exempt
w
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
September 28, 1999,5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System
was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m,on September 28, 1999. Members of the
Committee present were:
OCSD OCWD
Director John Collins,Acting Chair Director Iry Pickier(absent)
Director Norm Eckenrode Director Philip L.Anthony
Director Peer Swan Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.
General Manager Donald F. McIntyre,Alt General Manager William Mills Jr.,Alt
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Blake Anderson Director Wes Bannister Kellene Bum-Lucht,Camp Dresser McKee Inc.
Brad Hogin Director Jerry King Dick Corneille,Camp Dresser McKee Inc.
Wendy Sevenandt Director Kelly E.Rowe Brenda Deeley,Nelson Communications Group
Michelle Tuchman Thomas M.Dawes Larry Tenney,Nelson Communications Group
Jill Everhart Jeff Bower,Paine Webber
Clark Ids
Judy-Rae Karlsen
John Kennedy
Greg Leslie
Ron Wildermuth
Cindy Gehman
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion duly made,seconded and carried,the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held
August 24, 1999 were approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Amendment No. 1 with Nelson Communications Grouo
GWR System project manager Tom Dawes provided the Committee with information supporting the staff
recommendation for additional funds to enhance community education and increase the range of outreach
efforts by Nelson Communications Group. Prior to the vote, Director Eckenrode expressed his desire to
include local science teachers within the communication network.The following action was then taken.
1
1
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,the Committee
recommended that the Boards authorize issuance of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$71,000
to Task Order No.200917 to Nelson Communications Group for addition of public health
information element to the existing Public Information Program,bringing the total amount of the
Task Order to$275,895.
2. Ultra Violet Disinfection Assistance
Mr. Dawes reported that the CH2M-Hill stag has the necessary insight and experience with UV disinfection
processes to obtain the necessary approval from the California Department of Health Services for the
pending Tile 22 application and assist with developing testing protocols. After discussion,the following
action was then taken.
Upon motion by Director Collins, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,the Committee
authorized issuance of a Task Order to CH2M-Hill not to exceed the amount of$94,000 for
professional assistance with obtaining approval of California Department of Health Services Title
22 application and the development of testing protocols.
3. Additional Contract Employee Services
Mr.Dawes reported the immediate need for additional stag and recommended the employment of the
following engineers, 1)Project Engineer Tama S. Snow, P.E., under a One-Year Limited Term Employment
Agreement, and 2)Debra L. Burris,dba DOB Engineering, under a Task Order. He recommended a salary
rate of$75 per hour for both positions.The following action was then taken.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,the Committee
recommended that the Board:
1) Approve and authorize execution of a One-Year Limited Term Employment Agreement with
Tama S.Snow, P.E., in the capacity of Project Engineer at a rate of$75 per hour; and
2) Authorize the issuance of Task Order to Debra L. Burris, P.E., dba DOB Engineering for
professional services at a rate of$75 per hour in an amount not to exceed$112,500.
4. Status Report
Mr.Dawes summarized the current status of ongoing projects. He informed the Committee of potential
funding opportunities with the California Energy Commission and stag provided updates on Public
Information activities, Project Development activities, and the GWR System Benefit Analysis. The
Committee concurred with the stag recommendation to schedule meetings on October 12 and 26,
November 9, and December 14,to be held in the OCWD Boardroom at 5:30 p.m.
Mr. Dawes reported on possible upcoming expenditures required for the following: 1) Building several
display models, 2)Acquiring additional geological data in the area surrounding Harbor Avenue; and
3) OCSD required"Brine Effect'study. The Committee directed staff to provide a detailed cost estimate
prior to the next Joint Board Committee.
5. General Manaaers'Comments
General Manager Mills reported that the District had prepared a resolution expressing appreciation to
Senator Packard for his support in recent government proceedings. He suggested the Board of OCSD
might also consider this gesture of support Mr.Mills summarized recent government activities and
financial appropriations for Southern California agencies.
General Manager McIntyre stated that OCSD is still in the process of resolving the current Huntington
Beach ocean contamination problem. OCSD Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman invited the
Committee to an upcoming OCSD seminar on'Risk Management' by Peter Soloman, being held on
October 20 in the Huntington Beach City Council Chambers.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for October 12, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County
Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
October 12, 1999, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on
October 12, 1999. Members of the Committee present were:
OCSD OCWD
Director John Collins, Vice Chair Director Iry Pickler, Chair
Director Norm Eckenrode Director Philip L. Anthony
Director Peer Swan Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.
General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alt (absent) General Manager William Mills Jr., Alt.
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Blake Anderson Director Wes Bannister Dick Comeille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc.
Jim Herberg Director Kelly E. Rowe Brenda Deeley, Nelson Communications Group
Thomas M. Dawes Steve Tedesco, ASL
Jill Everhart Jeff Haden, Brown 8 Caldwell
Clark Ida
Judy-Rae Kadsen
Greg Leslie
John Kennedy
Cindy Gehman
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, with Director Pickler abstaining, the Minutes
of the Joint Committee meeting held September 28, 1999 were approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Communications Plan
GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes requested Brenda Deeley, Nelson
Communications Group to provide the Committee with an informative report on current
Public Relations activities. Ms. Deeley outlined the Crisis Communication Plan and
discussed the recommended approach to be used in the event of a crisis situation.
Ms. Deeley also notified the Committee of an upcoming reception and discussion with former
Senator Paul Simon being held from 2:00-3:00 p.m., at OCWD on October 28, 1999.
2. Santa Ana River Report
Mr. Dawes outlined the plan for the Santa Ana River pipeline. Mr. Dick Corneille,
representing Camp Dresser& McKee, highlighted the pipeline alignment plan, with
obstacles, challenges and options for alternative pipeline placements. Mr. Carl Nelson
presented the Committee with possible plans for the pipeline corridor through the Riverview
Golf Course.
3. Status Report
Mr. Dawes summarized the current status of ongoing projects and provided information on
future projects and potential cost estimates. He reported that OCWD received a check in the
amount of$75,000 from the State Department of Water Resources Planning Grant. Mr.
Corneille reviewed Project Development activities and Associate General Manager John
Kennedy reported on the MWD strategic planning progress.
4. Report of General Manager
Chief Operational Officer Blake P. Anderson reported that OCSD was offering an upcoming
seminar on Crisis Management, and mentioned that the Huntington Beach seawater
contamination crisis was determined to be caused by urban runoff.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for October 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.
e
BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeeangDare Tn Bd.of Dtr.
Io 7
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numter
Orange County Sanitation Distr R
FROM: David Ludwi , irector of Engineering
Originator: Sejal Patel, Project Manager
SUBJECT: TUNNEL STRUCTURAL REHABILITATION AT PLANT
NOS. 1 & 2, JOB NO. J-55
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve plans and specifications for Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant
Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-55; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specification; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award
construction contract to Ark Construction Company for Tunnel Structural
Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-55, for an amount not to exceed
$243,000.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for Job No. J-55 were completed in January 1999. The
project designer was RMS Engineering and Design, Inc.
Due to a failure of a tunnel cover at Plant No. 2, the Safety Division requested that a
review of other tunnels that are subject to vehicle traffic be conducted to determine
the condition of the structures. This project will provide structural rehabilitation and
cover repair of six existing process tunnels at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 where they are
located under a plant access road.
The plans and specifications for this project, Tunnel Stuctural Rehabilitation at Plants
No. 1 & 2, Job No. J-55, were bid on October 19, 1999. Construction completion is
scheduled for March 31, 2000.
Project Budget $426,300
Construction Budget $300,000
Engineer's Estimate $299,000
Low Responsible Bid $243,000
High Bid $447,154
Number of Bids 7
Page 1
1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The budget request authorizes $243,000
for construction contract and $44,900 for the total estimated cost for staff inspection
and construction management.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (1999-00 Budget, Section 8, Page 12, Tunnel
Structural Integrity and Cover Repair)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The failure of a removable tunnel access cover raised the concern about the
structural integrity of the older pipe tunnels located at the District's plants.
Consequently, the Safety Division requested that a review of tunnels that are subject
to vehicle traffic be made to determine the condition of the structures.
In 1998, RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. was hired to inspect and analyze the
existing tunnels, and determine what, if any, modifications to the structures are
necessary. The study identified the following tunnels that need structural
rehabilitation:
• Tunnels 3, 5, and 6 at Plant No. 1
• Lindstrom Tunnel, Freisen Tunnel, and Headman Tunnel at Plant No. 2
As recommended by the design consultant, this project will construct the following:
1. Demolition of the existing removable tunnel top slabs;
2. Installation of new removable concrete covers;
3. Relocation and/or removal and re-installation of piping, conduits, and lights;
4. Disposal of demolished material off-site;
5. Re-construction of a concrete beam inside Tunnel No. 5 at Plant No. 1
6. Removal and re-installation of guardrails at Plant No. 1;
7. Removal and replacement of pavement at edges of tunnels needed to
replace covers; and
8. Repair of cracks by routing and sealing.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives considering safety.
Page 2
Y
CEQA FINDINGS
Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 & 2 was included in the
Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on
July 19,1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Budget Information Table
2) Bid Tabulation
SP:jak
c:nreiownnpendo men RepoftUoint Bwrdsu-esv-ss AR1 D2799.doo
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
TUNNEL STRUCTURAL REHABILITATION AT PLANTS NO. 1 & 2, JOB NO. J-55
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTTTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 0%
Design Staff $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 3,000 30%
Consultant PSA $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ - $ $ 37,000 $ - $ 37,000 $ 29.000 78%
Constmetion Contract $ 300,000 $ 300.000 $ - $ - $ - $ 243,000 $ 243.000 E 0%
Construction Staff is 44,900 $ 44,900 $ - $ $ 44.900 $ 44,900 0%
Construction Other $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - E 0%
E 0%
Contingency $ 34,400 S 34,400 S - $ S - $ 0%
TOTAL $ 426,300 $ 426.300 $ - $ $ 47,000 $ 287,900 S 334,900 $ 32,000 68%
Budget Table
i
October 19, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 1
BID TABULATION
Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plants No. 1 8 2
Job No. J-55
Engineer's Estimate:$299,000 Construction Contract Budget: $300,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Ark Construction Company $ 243,000.00
2. Margate Construction, Inc. $ 273,600.00
3. Adams/Mallory Construction Co., Inc. $ 278,884.00
4. Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. $ 282,604.00
5. S.S. Mechanical Corp. $ 313,790.00
6. Zondiros Corporation $ 325,000.00
7. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. $ 447,154.00
8. $
9. $
10. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid
is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to ARK CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY in the bid amount of$243,000.0 s the lowest and best bid.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
H:Y p.dla`engUOBB s Corrrw.CTW-55u-55 Bid Tab.mo
Revised a5!1999