No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-09-22 `" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 15, 1999 peen (7143 982-2411 .Ill.,add,...: NOTICE OF MEETING RO.Box 8127 Flaunted Valley,CA 9272E-8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS streee.ddr.u: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 0 B44 Ellie Avenue Foan ain92 Valley,CA WEDNESDAY, September 22, 1999 — 7:00 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Meember Agencies Fountain Valley, California 92708 foli • titles Anaheim Bray, The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Buena Perk Cypress District will be held at the above location, time and date. Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beech Irvine Le g d Secr is Anent Loa Alamitos Newport Beech O Placentiae.c. Santa Ana Tentatively - Scheduled UDcomina Meetings Seat Beach Stanton moan vole Park JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Verb. Linde SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, September 28, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. county of orange @OCWD units" Districts STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. costa Mesa OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 6, 1999 at 5:00 m. Midway city P Water Districts PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, October 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 13, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, October 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 27, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. "To Protect the Public Health and the Envmnment through Excellence in Westawater Systems" ,�eo BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November 'November 17, 1999 December `December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 April April 26, 2000 May May 24, 2000 June June 28, 2000 July 'July 19, 2000 August August 23, 2000 September September 27, 2000 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month Hlwpdt dmin%BSNgenda%1999 Me NNdic WN9.2.dm AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 1999 -7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09/22/99 Page 2 w 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on August 25, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 08/15/99 08/31/99 Totals $9,249.062.41 $4.596,896.84 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 09/22/99 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 22, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the special meeting held on August 19, 1999 and the Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 25, 1999 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re September 1, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 1, 1999 to be filed. C. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program for an amount not to exceed $825,000 for each of the next five years. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-16, Supporting the Best Management Practices for Water Conservation. e. 1) Approve a budget amendment of$139,000 for Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, increasing the total project cost not to exceed $703,200; and 2)Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC), providing for additional engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring system for eight Central Generation System engines, for an additional amount of$62,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $404,500. f. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc., for an Anoxic Gas Flotation Process Demonstration, including the design and construction of a test facility and ongoing support for a one-year test, for an amount not to exceed $318,000, and an additional contingency of$32,000. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re September 2, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES - NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 2, 1999 to be filed. 09/22/99 Page 4 C. (1) Ratify Change Order 4 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing a credit of$38,134, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,423,631; and (2) accept Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Fleming Engineering, Inc. d. 1) Ratify Change Order 2 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, with First Fire Systems, Inc., authorizing a credit of$3,260 and a time extension of 79 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $357,450.49; and (2) accept Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. (1)Approve a budget increase of$42,196 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, for a total revised project budget of$6,386,196, and (2) ratify Change Order 8 to Improvements to Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$35,191 and 26 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$5,269,546. f. (1) Approve Addendum 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, providing for additional construction support services, for an additional amount of$27,687, increasing the total contract amount to not to exceed $515,632; and (2) and approve a budget amendment of$27,687, increasing the total project budget to $5,259,687. g. Approve Addendum 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, P.C., for Electrical Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$91,848, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,077,376. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re September 8, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 8, 1999 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1999. d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. e. Accept Purchase of New Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) as complete. f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-17, Amending District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. 09/22/99 Page 5 ,r g. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Gerald Jones for services re Reinvention Automation Project(Job No. J42) in the amount of$67.50 per hour plus actual travel expenses for a two-year period, in an amount not to exceed $123,500 per year. h. Consideration of request by Director Gullixson to have staff, General Counsel and the FAHR Committee reevaluate and conduct further studies relating to granting refunds to Yorba Linda (and other areas) property owners of sewer service charges paid by property owners for parcels not connected to the District's system. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re August 24, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 24, 1999 to be filed. 16. Authorize Environmental Science Associates to prepare and circulate the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan in compliance with CEQA requirements. 17. (1)Approve plans and specifications for High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to R. Fox Construction, Inc. for High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61, for an amount not to exceed $201,700. 18. Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 98-21, for purchase orders issued in connection with the Huntington Beach closure for Investigation of Coast Trunk Siphon (Specification No. P-188), in an amount not to exceed $455,000. 19. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 09/22/99 Page 6 1. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the Board is deciding whether to initiate litigation concerning regulation of biosolids (Government Code Section 54956.9(c). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Orange County Bankruptcy litigation— County of Orange v. Merrill Lynch, et al. (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 20. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 21. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 22. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 23. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 H.Wp.dla�gerMa rd Ager sal gag Beard AWe s`ag22gg.dm ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: September 22, 1999 TIME: 7:00 P.M. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON............. ......� ✓ — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD.................... �L — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ � — (COOK) ............................ COLLINS.................... .. (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... i — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... �_ �L — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... ✓ _,L — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. Ll — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN.................... `/ — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... —✓ _L — (WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON..................... — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ _ (MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. ✓ (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. . (FRESCHI)....................... PATTERSON................. CL (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. — i — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... . (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... ✓ — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... _ (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... — STAFF: tto Anderson ✓ `/,, Ghirelli Hod es (zQ Tgrtla J.udwiFr- ✓ Vim"`'' McIntyre / Miles Ooten Peterman Streed Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus �„y�/( 03/24/99 N:1wp.tlla�atlmin�BSIDIRECTORIOlredan:Rao Gall.tloc SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) 3e, n u Cj F Yf wood5l - cost, AeSA SRh blS'R'ICT HAWRDTAUWINSSV-0RMSlM-INFO M.DOC � e, �!'fi to 9.ea/97 COMMISSION ON BUILDING FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY INTERIM REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AUGUST 2, 1999 SEP� OF TN EUI1Ek� lC W = O r D Cq LIFORO' STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS.TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS.Ge.e BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY 990 9'Street,Suite 2450 Saaamenta,CA 95614-2719 (916)323-5400 FAX(916)323.5400 August 2, 1999 Dear Governor Davis: It is with great pleasure that we submit to you the interim findings and recommendations of the Commission on Building for the 21st Century. While this is an interim report,we believe that it represents a balanced and cohesive approach to the challenge of investing in the infrastructure of California for the new millennium. Our goal is to inform you with these interim findings and recommendations as you begin your dialogue with the Legislature on immediate bond and financing priorities. Formulated and developed by each committee after considerable fact-finding and deliberation, this report has been approved and endorsed by the entire Commission. The Commission adhered to your direction given at the outset of this process to preserve California's quality of life, maintain its economic prosperity, and live within our means. Moreover, we believe this report is consistent with your vision that all Californians share in the prosperous future that a strong infrastructure and public investment program will provide. Through these investments and strategies, we will: • increase the availability and affordability of housing,so that our citizens can afford to live within reasonable distance of their place of employment; • increase mobility and reduce congestion for commuters, through enhanced travel options in heavily traveled corridors; • sustain the high quality and reliability of our water supply for the state's residents, industries, and agriculture; • preserve our urban heritage park lands and recreational areas,so that Californian's can enjoy their beauty and seek refuge from the urban environment; and • embark on providing universal access to information technology for the youth of our state who embody our future. This Commission recognizes that these investments and strategies are not a panacea. It will take a sustained financial commitment to reverse the effects of the past inaction. We recognize that this is a complex and challenging undertaking. We applaud your courage and foresight in initiating programs that will benefit generations to come. We will continue this important work with the Commission to develop a long-range vision consistent with our May 1999 report. We will also continue to report our progress to you and complete a final report recommendations by December 2000, MARIA CONTRERAS-S ET,SecretaryUFRUZ M.BUSTAMANTE Business,Transportation and Lieutenant Governor Housing Agency FACILITIES COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Facilities Committee has analyzed infrastructure needs in a multitude of areas including coups,hospitals,museums,prisons,veteranti homes,housing,schools,and universities,and reviewed such issues as public building safety and retrofit,and public building capacity. In general, this committee notes the past fifteen years of under- investment in these critical components of Califomia s infrastructure. The Committee also considered the fact that educational facilities received substantial funding with approval of a$9.2 billion bond in November 1998 and that your recent initiative for a new prison was approved by the Legislature. Consequently, the committee did not consider these facilities for a year 20W state bond(although these facilities needs should be considered high priorities in the future). Based on the evidence of significant needs in particular areas,the committee makes the following recommendations: FINDING/RECOMMENDATION I Ensuring Housing Availability for All Californians Housing comprises an integral pan of economic development. High housing costs and the unavailability of housing constitute one of the biggest obstacles for California businesses,schools and government in recruiting the qualified,high caliber employees they need. California faces one of the highest housing costs in the nation. Eleven out of 25 cities with the highest cost-of-living in the nation are in this state. Because of these high costs,working Californians find themselves increasingly unable to afford a home and home ownership in California has now dropped to the second lowest level in the nation. Not only does a housing affordability gap exist,so does a rent affordability gap. California has fallen behind in supplying adequate and affordable housing to meet its citizens'needs. Finance mechanisms that provide housing forCalifomia's families are key to maintaining the State's economic prosperity and quality of life. Thus,this committee recommends at least a$750 million to$1 billion General Obligation housing bond proposal be placed on the year 2000 ballot. The committee believes the use of General Obligation bonds are an appropriate option to enable California to provide loans to first time homebuyers and assistance for teachers, firefighters, and police, so they can afford to live in the communities they serve. The uses of such General Obligation bonds are also appropriate to fund senior housing,seasonal worker housing and housing to lift the homeless into safe and secure surroundings. Together,these actions would also enhance the private sector's ability to build sufficient housing for California's future workers. Other funding methods,such as public/private partnerships and tax incentives,should also be used to increase housing resources. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 2 Facility Maintenance,Rehabilitation and Retrofitting Californians are entitled to live in, work in and visit safe buildings, yet funding for building maintenance,rehabilitation and retrofitting has been severely reduced in the past two decades. Existing buildings should be well maintained to preserve the State's earlier capital investments, and should be upgraded to meet the challenges of crime prevention and natural disasters, to ensure safety and capacity. It will take major investments to address these needs. Federal, state and local resources provided by previous legislation will soon be exhausted. Many of these funds come from local tax revenue and bond proceeds. Governor Davis has responded by addressing the substantial deferred maintenance backlog through the budget proms. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 3 Hospital Needs California should provide quality medical facilities and essential services for its citizens. Many hospitals in California have aged considerably and need to be rehabilitated. seismically retrofitted or replaced. After the Northridge Earthquake, SB 1953 was enacted requiring hospitals to submit retrofit evaluations to the state by 2001. Many nonprofit hospitals may not be able to afford retrofitting. Unless adequate funds are made available, California hospitals may not be able to do the rehabilitation or replacement required so that important medical services can continue to be provided for their communities. The first phase of hospital retrofit is due as of 2008 and is estimated to cost $10 billion, though better cost estimates should be available when evaluations are submitted in 2001. The committee is deferring its recommendations until this data is available. A variety of funding mechanisms should be explored to meet retrofit and replacement costs to ensure that no community is left without needed hospital care. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 4 Establishment of Criteria for Bond Priorities The committee will be studying and analyzing appropriate criteria and the context for assessing other key and critical California infrastructure needs through the fall and winter. Public facilities should be considered for bond financing in light of the State's overall infrastructure needs. A portion of bond proceeds could also be dedicated to increase public/private sector partnerships in meeting public infrastructure needs. In considering proposals for a year 2000 bond,the various types of public facilities were evaluated using the following criteria: 1)convincing evidence of current need;2)effect on public health and safety; 3)economic impact:4)impact on Californian's quality of life;5)availability of other funding sources;and 6)appropriateness of bond financing. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 5 Planning In its work over the last several months, the committee has come to appreciate the complexity of attempting to evaluate,compare,and prioritize the wide variety of state and local facility needs. Though the committee received valuable information from a variety of experts and interested parties, it is apparent that the State would benefit if decision-makers had a comprehensive inventory of its facilities needs and options for financing those needs. The State should develop a long-range capital plan that identifies its infrastructure needs, establishes priorities, and presents funding mechanisms to implement the plan. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Preservation and enhancement of California's natural resources are vital to maintaining a quality of life that will continue to attract industries and businesses to California. The information received to date is sufficient to make the following recommendations as immediate bonding priorities. These findings and recommendations presented below represent just a beginning for a comprehensive program to be developed over the next sixteen months. Recognizing there are other bond needs destined for the 2IXX1 ballot,we recommend S3 billion be allocated for resources, including water,parks,and open space. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 1 State Water and Environmental Needs An abundant supply of high quality water is the lifeblood of California,is crucial for all future conservation efforts, and there are many issues associated with ensuring its continuance. The State relies heavily on the San Francisco Bay/Delta water projects to supply the needs of its cities and farmland. Ecological issues associated with the Delta water system, including fisheries protection and salt water intrusion must be addressed with solutions that provide both flexibility and greatest economic return for the investment. Watersheds have to be protected to allow natural cleansing processes to occur and for wildlife habitat. Ensuring the safety and reliability of California's water supply also presents a pressing problem. Wastewater needs to be treated before it is released into the environment or before it can be recycled to reduce demand for pristine supplies.Older solid waste disposal sires pose environmental hazards as toxic chemicals seep into groundwater. Underground storage tanks must be leak proof to protect local aquifers. The state will have to address all these needs and many other water and resource issues to ensure an adequate supply of quality water in the next century. Other environmental priorities include cleaning up the toxic waste left over from past practices and in improving air quality. Urban areas,trying to attract inftll development must contend with remediating brownfield sites that are the legacy of past industrial usage. The majority of the State's population resides in air basins that are in non-attainment status for federal and state air quality standards. These needs could have serious consequences for the health of California's citizens unless they are addressed soon. The Department of Water Resources, State Water Resource Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency and CALFED estimate that short term needs to address these issues totals approximately S8.0 billion. Federal funding comprises one of the critical keys to helping narrow the gap between these needs and available funds. However,this funding must be matched with State and local resources. Of the $8.0 billion in needs, federal and local sources can supply approximately $2.7 and $1.3 billion respectively. Pay-as-you-go sources and already approved bond measures,including Proposition 204 funds,provide approximately$1.2 billion more. The State Infrastructure Bank and the Governor's enhanced commitment to torrent budget funding are available to localities to meet some of this water infrastructure need. We also must recognize that other methods of financing are available and need to be evaluated and,where appropriate,implemented if the State's water needs are to be met. This committee recommends that the Governor consider advancing a water bond up to $2 billion to address these critical water development,water reliability and water quality needs. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 2 State Natural Resource Needs California's enhanced quality of life depends on the condition and accessibility of its parks, open spaces, and natural resources. The quality and availability of these resources are a major pan of the decision making process for industries seeking to relocate. After over a decade of neglect and disrepair we must set as one of our highest priorities the rebuilding and expansion of precious resources and the reversal of the decline of California's quality of life. Quality parks and natural resources are lubricants for the State's economic engine because of their ability to attract tourism and new businesses. It is important to maintain and expand our state park system and local park and recreation facilities. Urban parks are also important to enhance our cities. The State's conservancies provide an invaluable service in preserving open space in areas impacted by development such as in the Coachella Valley,Santa Monica Mountains,San Joaquin Valley,and Lake Tahoe. The Coastal Conservancy has been instrumental in preserving public access to the State's beaches. In addition to providing view-sheds and public access, these conservancies also preserve habitat and ecosystems. More than 12 years have passed since parks and open space preservation have been supported through a State bond. As a consequence, the State Departments of parks and Recreation, Fish and Game, Forestry and Fire Protection, Conservation, and Boating and Waterways, in addition to the State Conservancies and the California Conservation Corp,have been hard pressed to keep abreast with the consequences of population growth, increased demand for services and urban encroachment. Responding to the State's natural resources needs is estimated to cost approximately $5.6 billion. Some of this need can certainly be met through federal,local,or pay-as- you-go sources of funds,as well as the generous support from land trusts and other private sources. There are three competing measures in the Legislature,Assembly Bill 18,Senate Bill 2,and Senate Bill 57:that propose to fund various components of the shortfall. To respond to this shortfall,this committee recommends a bond proposal of up to$2 billion to be placed on the year 2000 ballot. In conclusion,this committee recommends a combined amount of up to$3 billion in bonding priorities to reverse the decline in Califomia's quality of life. However,this committee must also note that providing this amount of funding does not cure the State's environmental problems. It is not possible to do so even within a single decade. Developing and funding the solutions must be pan of a long-term plan that provides a reliable and continuous source of funding which can be programmed towards identified needs,including ongoing funding for operations and maintenance of existing facilities and deferred maintenance. This committee will continue to define and scope the parameters of such a plan as pan of its mission. TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION Keeping current with technological innovation is the key to ensuring a high standard of quality of life for Californians by remaining economically competitive. The State must take active steps to prevent the creation of a "digital divide" between its citizens by ensuring that all Californians have universal access to the benefits of the technological revolution. The process of developing those steps creates many opportunities for the State. In exploring these opportunities, the members of this committee have heard testimony from educators and information technology expens on the subjects of using technology to improve education and rural medical care, relieving transponation congestion,and bringing government services closer to the public. This committee has also heard presentations from financial advisors, industry leaders, and legislators on innovative financing techniques, creating incentives to stimulate telecommunications industry investment within the state, and current legislative initiatives.The larger task of defining how these opportunities can be realized still remains before this committee. The following findings and recommendations are an initial step towards achieving that goal. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION Technology and Educational Infrastructure- Wiring the Schools The Technology Committee is exploring the development of goats and criteria towards a common approach to accomplish universal access to information technology by the educational community. This initiative has multiple dimensions as follows:Hardware /Conductivity, Training, Systems Support, Learning Environment, Professional Development, Evaluation, and Partnerships. The task of defining these dimensions requires industry,communities and the State to consider human resource,application, hardware,and software issues. Fortunately,various levels of government and the private sector have shown leadership in working towards these goals.Nationally,the Federal E-Rate program offers financial assistance for limited types of technological infrastructure. The State has moved forward in these areas through programs such as the Digital High School Program,which provides funding and technical assistance for bringing high schools into the information age and through Proposition I A funding. At the local level,Orange County uses video technology to develop educational skills for teachers and staff. Mendocino County has developed a comprehensive program that integrates technology directly into the civic and leaming environment. Private industry has contributed by providing hardware, software,and training at reduced or no cost through charitable programs. These efforts and programs,though valuable and pioneering,must be integrated into a comprehensive strategy to be effective. This strategy must ensure that all of the State's students,regardless of location or economic status,have access to technological benefits so that they are universally prepared for the challenges of the next century. Defining this strategy is the primary focus of this committee. It will accomplish this task through a three-part process as follows: I.) Surveying educational institutions, the private sector, and other organizations to determine where gaps exist in coordination and integration in the dimensions described above. 2.) Developing criteria,goals,and objectives that will guide the State and educational institutions in developing standards for universal technological access by the educational community. 3.) Recommending a financial strategy that will contain elements that maximize use of public and private funds and take advantage of innovative financing techniques. Although this committee will maintain a primary focus on technological innovation in educational infrastructure, it will continue to examine opportunities to realize similar gains for California in increasing access to governmental services and fostering electronic commerce. This committee will continue to define opportunities for innovation and, where possible,seek to make recommendations for their implementation. However,it must also be recognized that the process is a much larger undertaking that will involve a dialogue among all levels of government, industry, and the State c citizens. That dialogue cannot begin soon enough. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An efficient multimodal transportation system is integral to California as we move into the next century. Building upon the Governor's leadership in the budget response to transportation needs and in responding to his priorities of reducing congestion,shortening commute times for our citizens and increasing our productivity,the following interim recommendations will accelerate progress towards a 21 st century transportation system. These recommendations will improve the quality of life for California's families. While the current transportation environment is fraught with deficiencies, we believe great strides can be made to provide all of our citizens with equitable access and viable alternatives forcommuting and traveling throughout the State. The findings below will also be used as a framework by this committee to analyze transportation issues and alternative solutions,as it develops a course of action that will provide congestion relief, sustain economic growth,and improve the quality of life in California. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION I Transportation System Needs Senate Resolution 8,prepared by the California Transportation Commission,identified significant transportation system needs over the next ten years. These needs exist on our streets and roads,state highways,and public transit systems. In addition,the response to SR 8 demonstrated the near term need for strategic investment in goods movement, including enhanced seaport and airport access,and border infrastructure improvements. The needs include maintenance, rehabilitation,and capital expansion to meet existing and future demand. It is unclear at this time how many of these needs can be addressed through conventional and innovative transportation funding techniques. However,it is clear that a bond measure for these purposes may be an appropriate priority in the future. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 2 Rail and Ferries The State of California has invested a significant amount of capital funds over the last 15 years to construct and improve upon a well-designed passenger rail system. As the population continues to increase and the State's economy continues to grow,the State must continue to invest in the existing rail system to stem and actually reduce the growing congestion. In the San Francisco Bay area,ferries are an emerging and valuable strategy for reducing congestion on bridges. This committee recommends that a bond measure of$500 million to $1 billion be placed on the 2000 ballot to support a program of increased investment in capital projects that will improve California's passenger rail and ferry systems and help relieve congestion in well-traveled commuter corridors. The program should invest in projects that increase capacity and streamline operations on existing commuter corridors and that provide additional equipment to meet the needs of expanded capacity. The result of such an investment could increase rail and ferry service frequencies and reliability,reduce commute trip times,and improve safety and service quality for commuters. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 3 Local Transportation Finance Local transportation sales taxes are a significant flexible source of funding that should be preserved. Eighteen counties have enacted local sales taxes for transportation that have contributed over$30 billion in revenues for projects and programs. However, 16 of these counties will lose this valuable funding tool as their authorizing measures expire over the next 10 years. Given current state constitutional requirements mandating a supermajority vote to replace these taxes, it is unlikely that they will be renewed. We recommend that the Legislature approve a measure to accomplish the goal outlined in this recommendation for submission to the voters in the year 2((R). FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 4 Project Priorities California is faced with many conflicting transportation priorities that compete for scarce transportation funds. To maximize the return on our investment,in terms of mobility, economic,and environmental benefits,a uniform process for determining critical projects should be developed that is performance based. The act of determining such a system, including categories of measurement and appropriate performance indicators,will be a lengthy process and require input from all key transportation stakeholders. This committee believes this will require additional discussion before a final recommendation can be made. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 5 Federal Innovative Financing Techniques Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle Bonds(GARVEEs)provide a useful tool whereby the State can accelerate projects that have significant potential for a high return on investment. However,GARVEEs involve a Lade-off between increased cost for debt service,cost savings for inflation,and economic benefits of early project development. Given the current balances in the State Highway Account,the ability to use incremental advance construction funding techniques, and current high availability of federal obligation authority, this technique may not be required at this time. However, to maximize State flexibility to respond to changing conditions,the state should have the authority to issue such bonds to finance worthy projects. Any GARVEE authorization for project funding, should protect individual county shares,require a comprehensive cost benefit analysis,and protect the credit worthiness of the State. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 6 Use of Federal Trust Funds Due to delays in local project delivery,unused obligation authority levels have increased to the point where the State must take steps to ensure that it will be able to expend all of its available federal funds. Caltrans,the California Transportation Commission, and regional and local agencies must relieve project delivery backlogs and increase the flow of funds through the State Highway Account. FINDING/RECOMMENDATION 7 High Speed Rail High Speed Rail offers a long-term prospect for improving transportation options between major markets in California at an estimated cost of$20 billion to$30 billion dollars. Any recommendation in this area is premature until the High Speed Rail Authority completes its alignment,mode of service,and financial analysis. This committee will continue to monitor this effort and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)Mag-Lev Study. Commission Chair Secretary Maria Contreras-Sweet Commission Co-Chair Lieutenant Govemor Cruz M.Bnstamante Commissioners Dr.Richard Atkinson Bill Haack- Bob Balgenorth --► Gan•Hunt Dr.Joseph Barkett Bruce Karat- Don Benninghoven Senator Bettv Karnetre Bruce Blanning Jim Kellogg Keith Brackpool Don Ko11 Eli Broad George Marcus Ron Burkle Dianne McKenna James W. Callaway Eliseo Medina John Case Assemblywoman Peter Chernin Carole Migden Lein Coleman Mike Paparian Dave Condit Norm Pattiz Martha Dias-As_kena:v Art Pulaski Dr. Thomas A.Dillon Audrev Rice Oliver Phil DiNapoli Tom Savles Don Doser Sam Schuchat Dr.Steve Erie Gordon Smith Gary Fazzino Lester Snow Chief Justice Steven Szalav Ronald M. George Ronald N. Tutor Jim Ghielmetti Erik Vink Sam Ginn Max Warren Gene Hale Richard Ziman Jerry Halfisev v , - e r kLg�1r • �' ' iF' �r r Y'Y-S rr r � 4��. •'h C - - - G t.yY� Sx� iI SF 4.. � • •k LP �1� �rrj �� •� rW��IL r � � � r• • ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9e � w September 15, 1999 -hunt: (714)982-2411 Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary wing addrena: Presiding Judge of the Superior Court va Boa 8127 700 Civic Center Drive West is ra,a,ta;n Val",r 92]28-812] Santa Ana, CA 92701 E street address: 10844 Ellis Aerus SUBJECT: Grand Jury Report"Coastal Water Quality and Urban Runoff in 92]08-]018 Orange County" This letter is in response to the Findings from the Orange County's Grand Jury Walter Report"Coastal Water Quality and Urban Runoff in Orange County." Specifically, Atecies the Orange County Sanitation District(Hereinafter District) is required to respond to Findings"1" and "2"as listed in the report. The District has reviewed the report, and t Cities the following comments are submitted in response to its Findings. The District Anaheim appreciates the opportunity to respond to the report, and the Grand Jury should be a'44 commended for addressing this important and timely issue of coastal water quality evens Park j and urban runoff.Lypress ( rwnrem cagey i m deo- The District is a legislatively created special district mandated to provide sewage w ngzon saaM collection and treatment in the northern and central Orange County area. The Le Habra District's service area includes the following local cities:Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, La Patna Cypress, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Habra, La i � f Bey,"' ; No Palma, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, f orange Villa Park, Westminster, and Yorba Linda. r an.Ana j Sesl eeaon, Wastewaters are also received from the following entities: Unincorporated areas of Tustin Orange County, Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Irvine Ranch Water District, ✓Ma Parr; Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer District, Midway City Sanitary District, Santa ro'he Lvid. Ana Watershed Project Authority, Sunset Beach Sanitary District, U.S. Marine Corps I Gnmy of Orange Air Station El Toro, U.S. Marine Corps Air Facility Tustin, Naval Weapons Station P Seal Beach, and Air Forces Reserve Center Los Alamitos. tenter, Glstritts Gs. Mass The District provides wastewater collection, treatment and disposal for 2.2 million Mldwa, D1y residents. The District maintains two wastewater treatment plants located in Water Districts Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach that process an average dry-weather flow of 240 million gallons per day(MGD). The District operates 650 miles of sanitary t ' ^°Fie h sewers and 21 pump stations to transport sewage to the treatment plants. The upstream member agencies operate a total of 5050 miles of sanitary sewers and 100 pump stations. The treated wastewater is discharged to the Pacific ocean through a 10'diameter outfall pipe running along the ocean floor away from the mouth of the Santa Ana River. The outfall diffuser discharges at a depth of 200 feet below sea level at a distance of 4.5 miles from the shoreline. t I - "ro Pretatt Me Pudic Hearts and Me E.e,.am Mrough Eacel ence,n WBsleweter Syxems' I Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 2 of 10 September 15, 1999 Finding 1 of the Grand Jury Report: Historically, nonpoint source pollution received little emphasis and it continues to be a major source of ocean pollution. Many programs addressing ocean pollution have been initiated by agencies and organizations in the county but there is insufficient coordination of effort both within the county and between Orange County and adjacent counties. While the District does not have responsibility over stormwater flows, the agency works to integrate its activities with the community on a watershed basis. The District uses three mechanisms to coordinate action on stormwater issues: its ocean discharge permit, participation in watershed organizations to integrate its activities in the Santa Ana River and Newport Bay watersheds, and the use of stormdrain diversions into the sewer system. There are also important regulatory developments, discussed below, that will focus attention on this issue of urban runoff and stormwater flows. Ocean Discharge Permit The District operates under a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES)jointly issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX (EPA) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). This permit is based, in part, on an extensive monitoring program that was developed with much public input. It is composed of three sections: core monitoring, regional monitoring and special studies. The core monitoring program assures protection of local beaches from the influence of the District's effluent plume by monitoring seventeen shoreline locations at least five times per week during the recreational season (Memorial Day through Labor Day). The monitoring is done using three bacteriological indicators, and it is coordinated with the Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA) monitoring program. Both agencies monitor for Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform and Enteroccocus, as required by the Department of Health Services and the State Water Resources Control Board (SW RCB). All of our data is transferred to the OCHCA on a weekly basis, and it is provided to them immediately upon any indication that beach standards are not met for the protection of swimming. The OCHCA has worked with the District and the RWQCB to establish this shoreline monitoring program. See a further discussion below on the recent beach closures along Huntington Beach. Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 3 of 10 September 15, 1999 The District also participates in Regional Monitoring with the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP). The District is a founding member of SCCWRP, and we have worked closely with the project for many years. Most recently, the District has worked with SCCWRP on important regional monitoring studies including the 1994 and 1998 Southern California Bight studies (the Bight includes the coastal area from northern Baja California up to Ventura County). Also, the District participated in the Santa Monica Bay Epidemiological Study and a recent Bacteriological Study that included stormdrain outlets along the Bight. All of these projects have contributed significantly to a further understanding of the impacts from stormwater and urban runoff along the Southern California Coast. The District's ocean discharge permit also contains a requirement for Special Studies to gain a further understanding of the local water quality conditions. Ongoing studies include Plume Tracking and a greater understanding of the oceanographic conditions in Newport Canyon. The Plume Tracking study will help us to better understand the movement of the District's wastewater plume in the offshore waters. And a study of Newport Canyon (which begins directly offshore from the Newport Beach pier) is designed to assess if there are any impacts in the canyon from the District's effluent plume. Both of these studies are important to the issue of stormwater as the District seeks to distinguish any impacts from its operations from other discharges into local waters. Ongoing Watershed Activities The District participates with the following agencies and organizations over watershed issues: The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the State Water Resources Control Board (SW RCB)the Orange County Health Care Agency, the Newport Bay Coordinating Council, the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (SARWG), the Orange County Water Task Force, the Water Advisory Committee of Orange County, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Geological Survey, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The District's activities related to stormwater and urban runoff include: • A close working relationship with the Orange County Healthcare Agency to provide and exchange important data on bacteriological indicators along local beaches. I Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 4 of 10 September 15, 1999 • The development of a dry-weather diversion of stormwater/urban runoff from "The Dunes" Beach area in upper Newport Bay into the District's sanitary sewer system. This is discussed further below. • Provided scientific expertise to the Department of Health Services (DHS) in the development of beach posting and closure requirements pursuant to Assembly Bill 411 (1997) by Howard Wayne. • Have provided testimony to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) on the development of new criteria for the protection of beach swimming and recreation. Part of these discussions have been about the need to coordinate regulatory requirements between DHS and the SWRCB in order to maximize resources and assure consistency. • Participant and author in the Santa Monica Bay Epidemiological Study to develop new standards for beach swimmer health protection. • Participant in the SCCW RP study of beaches and stormwater outlets to beaches for bacteriological indicators. • Participant in two (2) Southern California Bight studies in conjunction with SCCW RP and numerous other public entities during 1994 and 1998. • Founding member of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group, a self-selected (voluntary)organization designed to pool resources and influence to resolve water quality, water quantity, endangered species, open space, flood control, agricultural and other issues of concern in the Santa Ana River Watershed. For this project, the District received the prestigious 1999 Public Service Award by the California Association of Sanitation Agencies. • The Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) is ajoint project of the District and Orange County Water District (OCWD) to implement large-scale water reclamation and defer the construction of a second ocean ouffall. The project will augment the District's capacity to store and dispose of flows during peak winter storms by diverting up to 100 mgd of secondary wastewater to the OCW D. The highly treated secondary wastewater, now discharged to the ocean, would undergo advanced water treatment; microfiltration, reverse osmosis and disinfection. The purified water will meet all state and federal drinking water standards. Recycled water from the project will be used to support the seawater intrusion barrier and the groundwater basin recharge, including future landscape Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 5 of 10 September 15, 1999 irrigation and industrial applications. The project would create a new, safe and reliable water supply to meet increase water demands projected for Orange County. • Participation in a Beach Closure Prevention Sub-committee with the SW RCB and other agencies to review Best Management Practices and Asset Management Programs to reduce local beach closures. • Inflow and Infiltration Reduction —A program established with local agencies (cities and sanitary districts)within the District's service area. The program provides funding for local agencies to repair and/or replace aging facilities that will result in reduced inflow and infiltration (1/1) entering the District system. The District's co-fund projects sponsored by the local agencies by either contributing up to 50% matching funds or by a combination of contribution and low interest loans. Under the program, local agencies submit project proposals for District funding. The proposals are evaluated for funding by the District Guidance Review Committee (Committee); a committee made of city representatives, District Directors, and local agency staff. During FY 98-99, the first year of the Cooperative Projects Program, approximately$3 Million in funding request were received. Under full-implementation of the overall program, the District is anticipating a 20% reduction in rainfall induced 1/1 by the year 2020. • The District provides training and assistance in Spill Response Procedures for local cities and other interested parties. This program was included the Water Environment Federation's national publication. The District maintains one of the best records on preventing spills from its sewer system. For the last ten years,on average, the District has had less than one beach closure per year caused by a spill from the District's system. The District remains committed to working with the local community including residents, agencies, and other organizations on a watershed basis to improve overall water quality and address other environmental concerns. Dry-Weather Diversions of Storrnwater/Urban Runoff The District recently participated in a study of microbiological indicators along the shoreline running from Point Conception down to Baja California (The Southern California Bight). The study found that increased levels of bacteria indicators were about ten times more likely to occur in stormdrain outlets than the portions of Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 6 of 10 September 15, 1999 beaches not impacted by runoff. The Study was published in SCCWRP's annual report. These and other studies have helped to raise concerns about the impacts from runoff upon recreational waters. Due to these concerns about urban runoff, the District is evaluating placing some stormdrain/urban runoff sites into the District's sewer system. Combined sewer and flood control systems are common in the Eastern United States, and separate sanitary sewer systems are common in the West. However, more agencies with separate sanitary sewer systems are beginning to accept dry-weather stormdrain flows in order to help prevent impacts to local beaches from urban runoff. The District is working on three diversion projects as discussed below. The District operates under an NPDES ocean discharge permit issued by the EPA and RWQCB. This permit has strict effluent limits for conventional and toxic pollutants. There is concern that untreated dry-weather urban runoff may contain high levels of some toxic pollutants such as metals and pesticides. Also, spills of flammable compounds could cause a hazardous condition in the sewer system. The District's collection, treatment and outfall systems have limited capacities. It is important that the District does not exceed the capacities of any of these systems since that could endanger the public health and the environment. Any diversion project must have a monitoring program and operational requirements to assure protection of the District's systems and compliance with the District's ocean discharge permit. The Dunes Beach in Upper Newport Bay has had repeated problems meeting bacteriological standards for swimming. The main suspect causing failure to meet standards is a local stormdrain. The District, in consultation with the OCHCA and the RWQCB has agreed to divert these flows into the District's sewer system during the dry-weather season (approximately April through October of each year). There is currently a temporary diversion in place, and the District, in conjunction with the City of Newport Beach and local property owners, is developing a more permanent diversion structure. The District has also received a proposal from the Newport Beach Surfrider Chapter to divert dry-weather flows from the Santa Ana River into the District's emergency outfall. This is a 78"diameter outfall structure that has not been used since the current 10' diameter outfall began service in 1971. The 78"diameter outfall extends 1.5 miles offshore from the mouth of Santa Ana River, and testing has confirmed that it remains available for emergency high flow conditions. The District's ocean discharge permit limits the use of this second outfall to emergency situations. The Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 7 of 10 September 15, 1999 RWQCB and EPA would need to approve its use for urban runoff flows. The Surfrider proposal has also been submitted to the County of Orange for their review. The District will contact both the County of Orange and the Surfrider for further action after it has completed its review of the proposal. Typically, dischargers to the District's system will apply for a permit to discharge through the District's Source Control Division. The Source Control Division has not yet developed specific requirements or guidelines for the discharge of stormwater/urban runoff into the District's system. The primary concerns are the presence of toxic pollutants, capacity of the sewer system, and wet-weather flows. These issues, along with treatment and capacity costs, will be reviewed by the District in establishing requirements for stormwater/urban runoff discharges. Recent Beach Closures in Huntington Beach The District has been spearheading an investigation into the recent closures of beaches along Huntington Beach. The District's monitoring program detected bacteriological indicator levels in excess of swimming/recreational standards. These numbers were immediately reported to the OCHCA, and the OCHCA began closing beaches in early July 1999. The District increased its shoreline monitoring program in coordination with the OCHCA, and it also began an exhaustive investigation into the source of the bacteria. Initially, the District was concerned that the high bacteria levels were caused by a leak from the District's sewer system. In response to this concern, the District inspected all of its local facilities to assure their integrity. All of the inspections established that there were no leaks, breaks, or failures in the sewer system. The District has participated with numerous local agencies, federal agencies, elected officials, consultants, and academics to research the cause of the high bacteria levels. To date, the District has spent in excess of$1.2 million on the investigation, and the source or sources of the high bacteria levels have not been located. This District continues to work cooperatively to solve this problem and prevent future beach closures. Due to suspicions about the presence of bacteria in stormwater/urban runoff flows into the Talbert Marsh, the District has worked with the City of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to divert flows from their stormdrain systems into the District's sewer system. These diversions will continue on an emergency basis until October 1999, the end of the dry-weather season. As a part of the overall investigation, the Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 8 of 10 September 15, 1999 future need for these diversions will be evaluated. At this time, it has not conclusively been determined if these stormdrain outlets caused or contributed to the high bacteria levels along the beach. It is too early to determine how important the use of stormdrain diversions into local sewer systems will be to improving beach conditions. The District will evaluate each proposal for a diversion on a case by case basis to determine if and when Flows can be accepted into its system. The District strongly supports maintaining open beaches along Orange County's coast, and we recognize the beach as our most important local resource. The District will bring its resources and technical expertise to bear in support of this commitment. Regulatory Developments The are current regulatory developments that will impact controls on Stormwater and urban runoff. The first is Califomia's Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program. The revised draft was published on July 2, 1999, and it is due to be adopted by the SW RCB and California Coastal Commission this autumn. The program contains a strategy, implementation plan and management measures to control polluted runoff. The program is scheduled to run from 1998-2013. Another important development is a proposed regulation by EPA regarding Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) [See 64 Federal Register 46011, August 23, 1999.1. TMDLs are the sum of all allowable discharges of a particular pollutant to an identified water body. When waters do not meet standards for protection, they are listed as impaired and require the development of TMDLs. TMDLs must consider discharges from point sources and nonpoint sources in their development. This will help to focus attention on impairments associated with stormwater and urban runoff, where appropriate. EPA reports that a majority of impaired waters are polluted by nonpoint sources. Finding 2 of the Grand Jury Report: Although there is agreement that the average citizen is a significant contributor to nonpoint source pollution, not enough has been done to enlist the cooperation of the public in eliminating the sources of the problem. There is also inadequate information reaching the public concerning the correct disposal of pollutants. The District agrees that the public needs more and better information about the relationship between their actions and urban runoff. While the primary focus of the Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 9 of 10 September15, 1999 District's public information efforts center on our operations, responsibilities and permitting for industrial facilities, we also include the problem of urban runoff in our presentations and printed materials. The District provides tours of our facilities in Fountain Valley to thousands of people each year. Most tours are given to local school children, but other visitors include residents, local officials, other wastewater treatment workers, and foreign visitors. The tours include an explanation of our operations as well as information about other agencies such as those responsible for stormwater Flows, flood control, hazardous waste disposal, and trash collection. Most visitors are indeed, surprised to learn that the County's sanitary sewer and storm drain systems are separate entities. There is a general belief that"everything is treated," including substances dumped in the gutter. To help dispel this misconception, the District includes a discussion of urban runoff in our tour presentation. Printed materials about urban runoff are included in our information packets along with watershed management posters that are distributed upon request to schools. The District also participates in the Orange County Fair each year. This is an important outreach tool that reaches tens of thousands of local residents in our service area. The Fair provides an excellent opportunity to explain the District's operations and planned activities to the interested public on an individual basis. And residents are interested in many of our activities including water reclamation, water conservation, industrial permitting, water quality monitoring, and how our facilities operate. Visitors to the booth are also told how they can help protect the environment by responsibly disposing of household waste. The Fair has consistently proven to be an effective communications tool to reach the public with information about the agency. The District also maintains an Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. The agency continues to improve the site to provide the public detailed information about our agency and its operations. The site also provides important links to other sites, including the County of Orange, that may be of Interest to those looking for information about the disposal of wastes. The District is participating in a pilot project with the EPA and RWQCB to post real-time beach closure and advisory Information and historic bacteriological monitoring data on the Internet. The District provides this information to the OCHCA, and the OCHCA forwards It to the SWRCB and EPA for posting. This site is in development and not yet available for public viewing. Once it goes live, it will be accessible through the EPA's Internet site at www.eoa.eov or by linking from the District's web site. Beach conditions are also available through the environmental organization Health the Bay at www.healthebay.ore. Honorable Kathleen E. O'Leary Page 10 of 10 September 15, 1999 Closing Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important document, Coastal Water Quality and Urban Runoff in Orange County. The report is timely and raises important issues about the impact on local waters from stormwater/urban runoff. The District recommends that the County of Orange, as the lead agency on the municipal storm water permit, prioritize the storm drains and other freshwater outlets, in consultation with the city co-permittees and OCHCA, that are problematic (i.e., causing chronic beach closures, postings, etc.). Based in this prioritization, the County should submit a proposal to OCSD for sewering (or otherwise managing) dry-weather flows. The Orange County Sanitation District remains committed to working with local partners on a watershed basis to resolve water quality and other environmental issues. If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact James Colston from my staff at 714-593-7458. Dontald F. Mcln General Manager DFM/JC:mcm H.Xwp.dt9Ms%3550%350LLeMeu3 dnd Jury Report Response FlnalAm c: Jan Debay Board Chair Board Members County of Orange, PF&RD EMT J. Colston ECM Files 9ii� The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act of 1999 Assembly Bill 1584 (Machodo/Costa) Enrolled to Governor on September 10, 1999 OCSD/SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED BENEFITS Southern California Integrated Watershed Program [See attached excerpts] $235 million This money is allocated to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority,upon appropriation by the Legislature to the State Water Resources Control Board. The following projects are allowed under the project: • Basin water banking • Contaminant and salt removal through reclamation and desalting • Removal of nonnative plants and the creation of new open space and wetlands • Programs for water conservation and efficiency,and storm water capture and management • Planning and implementation of a flood control program to protect agricultural operations and adjacent property to assist in abating the effects of waste discharges. Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program (Huntington Beach) [See $4 million attached excerpts] Provides for monies to the City of Huntington Beach,upon appropriation by the Legislature,to fund multiagency studies to establish recommendations to address coastal nonpoint source pollution in the tidal marshes and coastal waters,and to implement these recommendations. Agencies authorized to conduct the studies include cities,counties,flood control districts and sanitation districts. Watershed Protection Program (statewide) $90 million Grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to assist local agencies in implementing multi-objective watershed plans that help restore fragile ecosystems by controlling or eliminating pollution,reducing flooding, controlling erosion,improving water quality;60%of funds to be spent in six- county area of Southern California;earmarks$35 million for grants to small communities;transfers$2 million to Pajaro River Watershed Flood Prevention Authority,$5 million to Clover Creek Flood Protection and Environmental Enhancement Project,$2 million for Clear Lake watershed and$1 million for Russian River watershed. Non-Point Source Pollution Control Program $100 million Grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for local projects that protect the beneficial uses of water through the control of non-point source pollution;60%of funds to be spent in six-county area of Southern California; transfers$10 million for research and mitigation to protect water quality from pesticides;$5 million can be used for loans to finance concoction of projects designed to manage animal nutrients from animal feeding operations. Clean Water Program $100 million Grams and low-interest loans to aid in construction or implementation of projects under the Clean Water Act including$30.5 million for loans pursuant to Clean Water Act,$34 million for grants for construction of water treatment works m small communities,$35.5 million(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for treatment works in Manteca,Stockton,Tracy and Grange Cove and$7 million to local agencies for groundwater remediation projects. Coastal Non-Point Source Pollution Control $90 million Grants and low-interest loans(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to aid in construction or implementation of projects to improve water quality at public beaches;60%of funds to be spent in sin-county area of Southern California;earmarks S4 million(subject to appropriation of the Legislature)to City of Huntington Beach to study biological contaminants in tidal and coastal marshes and$3 million(subject to appropriation of the Legislature)for environmental and engineering studies for the San Diego Regional Conveyance Facility by the San Diego County Water Authority. Water Recycling Program $40 million Provides grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)and loans for public agencies to build facilities to produce and deliver recycled water, transfers unallocated funds from prior bond acts(approximately$70 million) into new program;60%of funds to be spent in six-county area of Southern California;contains language to encourage the SWRCB to expedite the review and processing of agreements to carry out purposes of program and provides for progress report to Legislature. Water Conservation Program $155 million Provides grants and loans(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to build and/or improve infrastructure to conserve water used for both urban($30 million)and agricultural purposes($35 million)and groundwater recharge facilities($30 million);provides grants for projects in economically- disadvantaged areas for the repair,replacement,restoration or rehabilitation of existing water distribution systems($60 million);transfers unallocated funds from Proposition 204. Flood Control Subventions S45 million Funds state's share of the nonfederal costs of local flood protection projects authorized as of January 1,2000,in specified counties;also contains language indicating that the state's share of nonfederal costs of projects adopted and authorized after January 1,2001,shall not exceed that portion of nonfederal costs authorized pursuant to specified provisions in Water Code. WATER QUALITY/WATERSHED BENEFITS Sate Drinking Water Program $70 million Loans and grants for undertaking infi istmcture improvements and related actions to meet safe drinking water standards;leverages five federal dollars for every state dollar. Seawater Intrusion Control $25 million Provides loans(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to control seawater intrusion;transfers unallocated funds from Proposition 204. River Protection Program $95 million Provides funding(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for the acquisition 2 and restoration of riparian habitat,rivcrine aquatic habitat and other lands in close proximity to rivers and streams;requires that 60%of funds be used for projects new metropolitan areas;earmarks$10 million for the San Joaquin River Parkway Conservancy and$2.5 million for the Kem River Parkway Project. Coastal Watershed Salmon Habitat Program $25 million Provides funding(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to protect,restore, acquire and enhance habitat for salmon;may be used to leverage funds,wben available. Water and Watershed Education Program $8 million Provides funding(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for various watershed education programs including the San Joaquin Valley Water Institute at California State University at Fresno($3 million),Delta Science Center(S2 million)and Watershed Science Laboratory in the North Delta($3 million) WATER SUPPLY BENEFITS Groundwater Storage $200 million Grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for feasibility studies, project design or construction of facilities for groundwater storage projects; ups feasibility studies at$200,000 and construction projects at$50 million; priority given to projects with available third-party funds(excluding CVP Restoration Fund);no less than 40%of funds in subaccount to be expanded for studies,projects and facilities within watersheds of Central Valley. Bay/Delta Multi-Purpose Water Mgmt. Program $250 million Provides funding(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for projects identified in the CALFED EIR/EIS as a Stage I Action: $17 million for treatment facilities or to relocate discharge facilities for agricultural drainage, S40 million to control waste discharges contributing to low dissolved oxygen, $120 million for fish screens in the Delta,$40 million for permanent barriers in the Delta,$17 million for controlling abandoned mine drainage and$16 million for permanent barrier at Grantline Canal. Interim Reliable Water Supply and Water Quality Infrastructure and Management Program $180 million Loans and grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for programs or projects located outside the Delta including: new or expansion of existing groundwater storage and recovery projects,for acquiring rights to use storage in existing reservoirs,for facilitating improved water treatment,water transfers and exchanges for water supply and quality improvements and for state-of-the-art agricultural water conservation programs;priority given to projects that: can be completed prior to March 8,2009,provide near-term benefits,improves water quality and protects water levels at San Luis Reservoir,includes public-private partnerships and are sponsored by a public agency with water supplies that we being or would be impacted by Delta- related shortages and water quality degradation. Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watershed Program $15 million Provides funds(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for improving and rehabilitating the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds and the water quality of Lake Elsinore. 3 FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS Floodplain Mapping Program $5 million Provides funds(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)to assist local land use planning to avoid or reduce future flood risks by mapping newly identified floodplains and revising outdated maps. Flood Protection Corridor Program $70 million Provides grants to local agencies(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for the acquisition,restoration,enhancement and protection of real property for flood protection,agricultural land preservation and wildlife habitat protection; earmarks$1 million for technical assistance to cities and counties; earmarks$5 million for the City of Santee for flood protection projects. Delta Levee Rehabilitation Program $30 million Fonds the Delta Levee Maintenance Subvention Program($IS million)and special flood protection projects on specified Delta islands($15 million). Urban Streams Restoration $25 million Grants(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for small flood protection and erosion control projects that typically include work by community conservation corps. Capital Area Flood Protection $20 million Partially funds state's share of the costs of federally-authorized flood management projects in Sacramento County(subject to appropriation by the Legislature). San Lorenzo River Flood Control $2 million Fonds state's share of the costs of federally-authorized flood management projects in the Santa Cruz region(subject to appropriation by the Legislature). Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program $90 million Provides funds(subject to appropriation by the Legislature)for flood protection projects($70 million)and fish and wildlife enhancements($20 million)along the Yuba and Feather Rivers and the Colusa Drain;allocates$2.6 million to pay for state's share of levee repairs in Sutter County. Arroyo Pasajero Watershed Program $5 million Funds(subject to appropriation by Legislature)flood control projects protecting the California Aqueduct in the area of the Arroyo Pasajem Crossing. 4 P [EXCERPTS FROM AB 1584] AMENDED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 3, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 26, 1999 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 12, 1999 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 27, 1999 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE1999-2090 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1584 Introduced by Assembly Member Machado and Senator Costa (Principal coauthors: Assembly.Members Cardoza and Florez) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Calderon,Kuehl,Strom-Martin,and Thomson) (Coauthor:Senator Ortiz) February 26, 1999 An act to amend Sections 13480, 14058,and 78621 of,to add Division 26(commencing with Section 79000)to, to add and repeal Section 1812.6 of, and to repeal and add Sections 78626, 78648.12,and 78675 of,the Water Code,relating to financing a safe drinking water,water quality,flood protection, and water reliability program,by providing the funds necessary therefor through the issuance and sale of bonds of the State of California and by providing for the handling and disposition of those funds,and declaring the urgency thereof,to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1594, as amended,Florez. Safe Drinking Water,Clean Water,Watershed Protection,and Flood Protection Act.Under existing law,various bond acts have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water projects,facilities,and programs. This bill would enact the Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water,Watershed Protection,and Flood Protection Act which,if adopted,would authorize,for purposes of financing a safe drinking water,water quality,flood protection,and water reliability program,the issuance,pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law,of bonds in the amount of$1,970,000,000. The bill would also provide for the use of prescribed bond funds,and funds repaid to the state pursuant to certain loan contracts,for specified programs established by this act The bill would require the Secretary of State to submit the bond act to the voters at the March 7, 2000, statewide direct primary election. The bill would amend a provision relating to the calculations of the interest rate to be applied to certain loans from the State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund. The bill would require the Imperial Irrigation District, the Coachella Valley Water District, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to sign and adopt a prescribed quantification agreement on or before October 15, 1999, and, if the districts do not do so, would require the Governor or his sole designee to promulgate a quantification settlement by January 1, 2000, as specifted. The bill would impose specified duties on the Governor with respect to the agreement or settlement. 9 The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2/3 . Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as jollows: SECTION 1. Division 26 (commencing with Section 79000) is added to the Water Code,to read: DIVISION 26. SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION, AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT CHAPTER 1. SHORT TITLE 79000. This division shall be known and may be cited as the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000. CHAPTER2. DEFINITIONS 79005. Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in this chapter govern the construction of this division. 79006. "Bay-delta" means the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary. 79007. "Board" means the State Water Resources Control Board. 79008. "CALFED" refers to the consortium of state and federal agencies with management and regulatory responsibilities in the bay-delta that are developing a long-term solution to water management, environmental, and other problems in the bay-delta watershed. 79009. "Clean Water Act' means the federal Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.),and includes any amendments thereto. 79010. "Committee" means the Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection,and Flood Protection Finance Committee created by Section 79212. 79011. "Delta" means the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. 79012. "Department" means the Department of Water Resources. 79013. "Fund" means the Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Bond Fund created by Section 79019. CHAPTER 3. SAFE DRINKING WATER,CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION,AND FLOOD PROTECTION BOND FUND 79019. The proceeds of bonds issued and sold pursuant to this division shall be deposited in the Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Bond Fund,which is hereby created. CHAPTER 6. WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM Article 5. Southern California Integrated Watershed Program 79104.20. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following: (a)The Santa Ana Watershed is experiencing increased water demands due to significant population growth that has caused undue infrastructure dependence and strain on imported water supplies. P (b)Regional programs have been developed to address the problems facing the watershed. These programs have four main elements, as follows: (1) Storage of more than one million acre-feet of water from wet years in groundwater storage basins. (2) Conservation, including water use efficiency and reclamation, that results in the substantial development of new usable supplies. (3)Desalting and treatment of brackish water to allow poor quality water to be reclaimed and used. (4)Enhancement of native habitat along the river and its tributaries. (c)The water supply programs proposed by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority will develop significant new water supply and storage capabilities,thereby reducing the imported water needs of urban southern California, especially during dry years. 79104.22. (a)There is hereby created in the account the Santa Ana River Watershed Subaccount. (b)For purposes of this article, "subaccount" means the Santa Ana River Watershed Subaccount created by subdivision(a). 79104.24. The sum of two hundred thirty-five million dollars ($235,000,000) is hereby transferred from the account to the subaccount. 79104.26.The money in the subaccount,upon appropriation by the Legislature to the board,may be used by the board for allocation to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for all of the following projects for the purposes of rehabilitating and improving the Santa Ana River Watershed: (a)Basin water banking in one or more of the following basins: Chino, Colton, Orange County,Riverside, San Bernardino,and San Jacinto. (b)Contaminant and salt removal through reclamation and desalting in Orange County, San Jacinto, or other basins in the watershed. (c) Removal of normative plants, and the creation of new open space and wetlands. (d)Programs for water conservation and efficiency, and storm water capture and management. (e)Planning and implementation of a flood control program to protect agricultural operations and adjacent property and to assist in abating the effects of waste discharges into waters of the state, consistent with the requirements of Section 13442. 79104.30. It is the intent of the Legislature to urge the federal government to allocate funds for projects to improve the Santa Ana River Watershed to match the state's financial commitment to the projects described in this article. 79104.32. It is the intent of the Legislature that the expenditure of the funds under this article be made through a broad-based watershed stakeholder process. 79104.34.Not more than 3 percent of the total amount deposited in the subaccount may be used to pay costs incurred by the board in connection with the administration of this article. CHAPTER 7. CLEAN WATER AND WATER RECYCLING PROGRAM Article 5. Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program 79148.7. Notwithstanding any otherprovision of this article, the sum ojfour million dollars ($4,000,000), upon appropriation by the Legislature to the board, shall be allocated by i the board to the City of Huntington Beach to fund multiagency studies to establish recommendations to address coastal nonpoint source pollution in the tidal marshes and coastal waters, and to implement those recommendations. Agencies authorized to conduct the studies and implement the recommendations may include, but need not be limited to, municipal and county governments,flood control districts, and sanitation districts. Curt Pringle & Associates� public relations*consulting•government a0airs September 20, 1999 Don McIntyre Genral Manager, O.C. Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear As you probably have already heard, on Friday, September 10, 1999 the State Legislature passed a $1.9 billion dollar water bond measure designed to address California's water needs. The bond, expected to be signed by Governor Davis, will be headed for the March 2000 ballot for a statewide vote. By passing a resolution in favor of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) plan and through the active involvement of many groups on behalf of Southern California interests, collectively we were able to secure $250 million dollars specifically earmarked to fund watershed replenishment projects along the Santa Ana River benefiting Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and parts of Los Angeles Counties. Specifically, the bond provides dedicated funding for Orange County groundwater replenishment, Chino Basin clean-up and conjunctive use, Santa Ana River Corridor open space, Santa Ana River water resources and habitat enhancement, and Santa Ana River Wetlands Development including Newport Bay Wetlands Projects to name just a few. Additionally, $45 million in flood- subvention monies was earmarked in the bond with a major share coming to Orange County. Furthermore, because most other items within the bond are not specifically earmarked, other water projects throughout the Southland may still apply for dollars in the general fund of the bond. In all, the water bond is the most money Southern California, and Orange County in particular, has ever received in a bond package for water projects and water storage. On behalf of SAWPA, we sincerely appreciate your support for Southern California water projects and in particular, SAWPA's specific proposal. Indeed, together with many other agencies and city governments throughout Southern California, your hard work proved effective in helping to ensure Southern California's clear voice in the statewide water discussions as well as the region's economic stability and quality of life we have all come to enjoy. 2532 dupont drive a irvine, california 92612-1254 ph:949/474-4090 a far: 949/474-4082 *e-mail: email C&curtpringle.com SAWPA support Page 2 Thank you again for your support of the SAWPA plan. Please let me or Bill Guzik of my office know to whom I should address future information regarding water-related issues. We can be reached at (949) 474-4090. I look forward to hearing from you and continuing to work with you on water and other important issues affecting our community. Si rely�"y��/� Cu t Pring}€\ 1 4 'te - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 15, 1999 (714)962 2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors milling addroc PO a 8127 Subject: Board Letter Foul valley.CA 92728 612) .viit:dd„ii: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 10844 Ell Avenue Fountain valley.CA information on any of the items, please call me. 92708 7018 Update on Huntington Beach Contamination Investigation M.ml» The investigation into the cause of the high bacterial counts along Huntington Beach Agencies continues. A thorough cleaning and visual inspection ruled out the siphon portion of • the District's Coast Trunk Sewer as a possible source of the beach contamination. In titles late August, attention was focused on urban runoff from upstream drainage channels that flow through Talbert Marsh and onto the beach. Several storm drain pump Aral stations and a construction dewatering project that discharged into the Talbert Buena Pa k Channel were rerouted and connected to the District's sewer system in late August. Cy,. During the week prior to Labor Day Weekend the bacterial indicator counts dropped FDuntain Uelley back to normal and, as a result, the Orange County Health Care Agency reopened the Fullerton Garden Grove entire stretch of beach from the mouth of the Santa Ana River to Goldenwest Avenue Harlington Beach that had been closed. rnne Le Pyu b La Palma During the first week in September, however, some of the bacteria standards were L.Alamrtoe 'Again exceeded and a stretch of Huntington State Beach was posted (but not closed). NewPorc raeath nge The Health Care Agency intends to post warning signs rather than close the beach Orange 9 oY P 9 9 ( ) Morenoa when a standard is exceeded because they no longer believe the Contamination is San.Are sewage-related. However, more beach closures are a possibility if the current surf- SealBeech Stanton zone monitoring or other testing reveals a possible link to a sewage source. Daily e. bacteria counts are shown on the District's website, www.ocsd.com. Additional work una Park Verb. Linde by the District, City of Huntington Beach, and others, is planned to investigate the storm drains in the area along with the Talbert Marsh and Santa Ana River as County of Orange possible conduits for the contamination on the beach Sanitary Districts As the District continues to participate in a lead role in the investigation of the Cuath Maaa Huntington Beach closure project, we continue to incur costs associated with our due Midway City diligence efforts. The beach closure, which lasted from the Fourth of July weekend to Cos„r Districts the Labor Day weekend, has required thorough investigative and support efforts that have resulted in significant Engineering, Technical Services, General Services, Irnne Parch Communications and Administrative costs. The level of District effort has been reported in some depth at the various Committee meetings as summarized above; however, the overall costs have not yet been discussed in any detail as estimates changed rapidly. As we begin to demobilize from our emergency-stance to a longer term planning mode, our ability to estimate the incurred costs has improved. Thus far, based on purchase orders and other preliminary data, it is estimated the District has spent$1.2 million on all efforts related to the Huntington Beach closure project. -To Protect the Pu06c Health and Me Erotronment through Ercellerce in"clareaser Systems' Members of the Board Page 2 September 15, 1999 These are categorized as follows: • $535,000 related to siphon cleaning, leak investigation, and engineering/construction for pipe downsizing. $100,000 for initial Coast Trunk diversion of the siphon structure. $147,000 for line cleaning, Closed Circuit Televising (CCTV), and minor collection system repairs related to the beach closure investigation. • $118,000 for research related to flow monitoring, beach hydropunching, and ground-penetrating radar(GPR) studies. $90,000 for an Outfall Dye Study(underway). $34,000 for a Talbert Marsh study conducted by University of Southern California staff. • $62,000 in research vessel and associated in-house laboratory sampling costs (largely lab staff time). $7,000 in aerial photography and contracted document research. • $106,000 in District staff time. These project costs will increase, though (likely) not dramatically, as we continue to refine our data and conduct further research into the source of the problem. We are working cooperatively with the involved agencies to develop an equitable cost-sharing plan related to this on-going project. Until such time when we are able to confirm one or more sources for the Huntington Beach closure project, or unless future policy direction dictates otherwise, current project expenses are being allocated to Revenue Area 11. At minimum, siphon cleaning, remodeling and rehabilitation will be permanently allocated to Revenue Area 11. We will be in a position to provide more financial details at the October FAHR Committee and Board meetings. Wastewater Agencies Comment on State-wide EIR on Biosolids The nearly two-year process for the State Water Resources Control Board to write a programmatic EIR has reached an important milestone. The deadline for public comments on the draft EIR has closed. Staff from the Sanitation District has been very much involved in the process. A copy of the comments that were recently submitted to the SWRCB is attached. The comments were submitted jointly by CASA (California Association of Sanitary Agencies), Tri-TAC(a technical advisory committee to the State Water Resources Control Board), and SCAP (the Southern California Alliance of POTWs). Two of the three signatures were those of our own staff members who chair these groups, Mike Moore and Layne Baroldi. Members of the Board Page 3 September 15, 1999 EPA Supports Our Opposition to Class B Biosolids Ban in Kern County The EPA has sent a letter to the Planning Department of Kern County. EPA indicates that the existing practice of using Class B biosolids from the municipal wastewater treatment plants in southern California on agricultural land in Kern County is not only appropriate, but has several significant environmental advantages as compared to other biosolids management alternatives. A copy of the letter is included. AB 71 Signed by California Governor Creating an immediate leap forward for the natural gas vehicle industry and clean fuel industry advocates in general, California Governor Gray Davis signed AB 71 (Cunneen) into law. The bill was co-sponsored by the CNGVC and State's electric vehicle coalition (CalETC). AS 71 will allow qualifying vehicles to use HOV lanes without a restriction on vehicle occupancy. Bottom line: if you drive an alternate fuel vehicle, you will be entitled to drive in the carpool lane by yourself. Distinctive decals are being developed to identify qualifying vehicles to law enforcement personnel and other motorists. The incentive becomes available on July 1, 2000, providing the Department of Motor Vehicles time to implement a decal issuing and verification system, and sunsets in 2007, ...And the Rubber Chicken Circuit Begins As expected, we are receiving requests to discuss our observations about the Huntington Beach incident. Charlie McGee spoke extemporaneously to a group of coast pollution experts that were coincidentally assembled at a national conference in San Diego in early September. Blake Anderson has been asked by SCAG's Energy and Environment Committee to address the public policy implications of this summer's incident at the Committee's October 7 regularly scheduled meeting. Regulatory and operating agencies at the national, state and southern California levels are watching Huntington Beach with considerable interest. They love a mystery and they want to understand the implications of the tougher beach standards that California enacted with AB 411. They want to use our real world experience to struggle with the contradictory objectives of public health protection, reasonable beach access, and affordable public infrastructure. California Water Bond Ready for Governor's Signature and March 2000 Ballot The California Senate and Assembly have approved a $1.7 billion bond measure that, if signed by Governor Davis, will appear on the March 2000 ballot. As the directors will recall, you authorized a resolution of support at the July Board Meeting. Our support, along with similar resolutions from 40 other entities in Orange County, helped to get the bill successfully through both houses of the legislature. The bill contains money for a number of water quality and reliability initiatives here in our Santa Ana Members of the Board Page 4 September 15, 1999 River watershed, including money for correcting the impact of urban non-point source runoff on Huntington Beach, and $37 million for the GWRS project. As of this writing, staff has not obtained the specific language of the bill, but will do so prior to the Steering Committee and Board Meetings of September 22, 1999. Full text copies of the bill will be provided in your agenda folders Wednesday night, along with a short synopsis of the bill's most significant features. Staff will also brief the Steering Committee on the bill's main features and will report on whether we believe the bill is sufficiently earmarked to maintain the support of this Board. The July resolution of support required that projects for Orange County and the Santa Ana River watershed by specifically earmarked and that the overall amount of the bill be apportioned between northern and southern California based on population. SCAP Monthly Update Also attached is SCAP's monthly newsletter, which contains several articles of interest. The Kiplinger Washington Letter's Report on Water I have attached a copy of the August 20 Kiplinger Washington Letter that discusses water-related issues nationwide. SB 709 Workshop for POTWs and Storm Water NPDES Permit Holders CASA and the League of Cities is putting on a workshop for POTWs and storm water NPDES permit holders on the new RWOCB enforcement requirements mandated by SB 709. Staff associated with negotiating our permits, permit compliance issues, preparation of DMRs, enforcement response, etc. are candidates to attend this training. Jean Tappan is coordinating a single response from the agency with the list of names of people who will attend. Send her your list of names. She also has the flyer about the So Cal session scheduled for Monday, Nov 1, Ontario Airport Marriott Hotel, 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. SCAOMD to Tackle Diesel Toxicity on Par with Ozone Programs Expanding its role into new territory, the South Coast Air Quality Management District is crafting a sweeping strategy to reduce the health threat people face from breathing diesel exhaust and other carcinogenic chemicals polluting the air. The ambitious plan, already under attack from the trucking industry [prior to its release], could lead to Members of the Board Page 5 September 15, 1999 the nation's first comprehensive regulations for battling airborne toxic substances. The SCAOMD board is expected to formally direct its staff to complete work on the outline for new and revised rules, which would rival in scale the agency's massive strategy to combat ozone, the primary ingredient in smog. SCAOMD intends to use an obscure, 12-year-old state law that grants the authority to regulate public and commercial fleets of more than 15 vehicles. Unlike the situation with ozone, the SCAQMD faces no federal or state mandates to clean up toxic air pollutants. Last year, the California Air Resources Board declared diesel soot a cancer-causing pollutant and is trying to figure out how to reduce the threat. "This would put the SCAQMD ahead of the tune," said Felicia Marcus, the EPA's regional administrator. "It is very encouraging"- From the LA Times, 9/10/99 Regional Board Addresses Waste Discharge Requirements for Animal Feeding Operations Attached is a letter dated September 10, 1999 that addresses the Regional Board's recent adoption of Order No. 99-11 and the Cease and Desist Order No. 99-65. This is a major step in protecting the regional groundwater basin and watershed. Newspaper Clippings on File in Communications Department The number of newspaper clippings that have been part of this monthly packet has become overwhelming and has increased our photocopying and mailing costs. To combat this problem, yet meet your information needs, we have established a Directors Reading File in the Communications Department. Staff will continue to Gip newspaper articles of interest On a daily basis and will be happy to send you copies of items you may request. In addition, beginning this month, two folders marked "Directors Reading File"will be placed on the back table prior to a Board meeting and at all committee meetings. Please feel free to look through the file. Copies of newspaper articles can be obtained by contacting Suzanne Smith of the Communications Department, 714 593-7123. Odor Complaints During the past month we received four odor complaints about Plant 2 and two about Plant 1. Staff made changes as necessary, which corrected the problems. District to Host Peter Sandman, Risk Communications Expert You may have heard about Peter M. Sandman, Ph.D., a national authority on communicating risk and managing public outrage. He's spoken at several industry conferences, including AMSA. The District will be sponsoring a day-long workshop Members of the Board Page 6 September 15, 1999 featuring Dr. Sandman on Wednesday, October 20, at Huntington Beach City Council Chambers. As a Director, you will receive one free registration. The cost of registration for all other attendees will be $95, which includes lunch. We are contacting several other public agencies that might want to co-sponsor this event with us. Huntington Beach was selected because the Council Chamber can seat 200. Save- the-date cards have already been mailed, with registration brochures to be mailed on September 22. For further information, contact Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, 714 593-7120. Out of the Office I will be out of the office between October 4 and October 24, on vacation—followed by a conference in Washington, DC. Blake Anderson will be in charge during my absence. If you need to contact me, my assistant Jean Tappan has my itinerary. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald ntyre General Manager DFM:jt N% Go1Av.wImcrApGM1EREnS TO Me 6wxmseo ooc Attachments 00 Tri =TAC SCAP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE Or PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS September 10, 1999 Todd Thompson State Water Resources Control Board 901 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 SUBJECT: Comments on the Draft Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements and the Draft Environmental Impact Report Dear Mr. Thompson, The California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), Tri-TAC, and the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP), (collectively, the Associations) are California-based associations of public wastewater collection and treatment agencies. CASA represents 87 member agencies, both large and small, that collectively serve some 15 million Californians. Tri-TAC is a technical advisory committee representing California municipal wastewater management agencies that together treat and reclaim more than two billion gallons of wastewater each day. Tri-TAC is sponsored by the League of Cities, CASA, and the California Water Environment Association. SCAP is a non-profit professional organization representing 52 member agencies in southern California. The Associations' mission is to work with regional, state, and federal regulatory agencies on matters relating to publicly- owned treatment works (POTWs). Their goal is to improve the overall effectiveness of environmental programs and ensure that regulations affecting POTWs in California are reasonable and in the public's best interest. The Associations appreciate this opportunity to review and comment on the Statewide Biosolids General Order and its associated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This letter is being sent to demonstrate the Associations' support for the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) effort to develop a reasonable, science-based General Order that will allow for the continued land application of biosolids in an environmentally safe manner without overly burdensome regulatory requirements. Todd Thompson ' Page 2 September 10, 1999 Biosolids reuse has been shown to be a positive environmental force that is strongly encouraged by the USEPA and environmental groups that look at the whole environmental picture. It is the only fertilizer/soil amendment application process that requires agronomic rates of nitrogen application to prevent groundwater nitrate contamination - one of the major water quality issues in California. Biosolids reuse reduces the waste of organic matter and rapid filling of our landfills. The SWRCB should continue to support responsible biosolids reuse with science-based efforts such as the General Order and EIR. The Associations agree strongly with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that "[a]rgument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts which do not contribute to, or are not caused by, physical impacts on the environment, is not substantial evidence. Substantial evidence shall include facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts." The Associations strongly believe that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that biosolids land application will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Associations believe that the Final EIR should conclude that the opponent's concerns related to biosolids land application are based on distorted/inaccurate public perception and not scientific facts. According to CEQA, the SWRCB's regulatory requirements in the General Order must be based on substantial evidence and not on negative public perception of biosolids recycling. Thus, all references to public perception concerns should be deleted from the Draft General Order. The SWRCB should refrain from imposing requirements without a scientific basis except where science may not apply and best professional judgment would be appropriate. For instance, best professional judgment may be appropriate for establishing requirements related to nuisance prevention, such as buffer zones and housekeeping requirements. Any subjective requirements should also be avoided. The Associations continue to recommend that the SWRCB limit the applicability of the General Order to only Class A and Class B biosolids, and adopt a waiver process for Exceptional Quality (EQ) biosolids similar to that adopted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. As currently written, the Draft General Order will subject the use of biosolids compost and other EQ biosolids "products" to this permit, potentially resulting in a marketing disadvantage for those high quality products. Such an economic disadvantage may ultimately thwart efforts to create and reuse higher quality biosolids. If the SWRCB intends to maintain this overly inclusive approach, the potential environmental impact of increased regulation of EQ biosolids needs to be studied as a part of the EIR scoping process. Todd Thompson Page 3 September 10, 1999 The Associations, on behalf of their member agencies, respectfully submit the attached comments on the Draft General Order and the Draft EIR for your consideration during the development of the General Order and Final EIR. Should you have any questions, please contact Layne Baroldi at (714) 593-7456. ' �Zaynf T. Baroldi Michael D. Moore Ann Briggs CASA Land Subcommittee Tri-TAC Land Committee SCAP Biosolids Committee Chair Co-Chair Co-Chair LB:wh H:%WP.DTA%TS'aM5 9AROLDILWIR&ag.DOC c: James M. Stubchaer, SWRCB Board Chair Mary Jane Forster, SWRCB Board Member John W. Brown, SWRCB Board Member Arthur G. Baggett, Jr., SWRCB Board Member Michael D. Rushton, Jones and Stokes Michael F. Dillon, CASA Executive Director Steven Majoewsky, CASA President Phil Bobel, Tri-TAC Chair Michael D. Moore, Tri-TAC Land Committee Co-Chair Robert Gillette, Tri-TAC Land Committee Co-Chair Layne T. Baroldi, CASA Land Committee Chair Ann Briggs, SCAP Biosolids Committee Co-Chair Mike Sullivan, SCAP Biosolids Committee Co-Chair Gt�art�c i �ARo�O( �6. M• MwrZ A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ��Wn► REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Simi San Francisco,CA 94105 SEP 10 Glenn A. Barnhill Special Projects Division Chief Planning Department,Resource Management Agency 2700"M"Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield,CA 93301-2323 Re: Consultation Process on Proposed Negative Declaration for Biosolids Ordinance (County of Kern (R0027)) Dear Mr. Barnhill: This letter summarizes the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) comments on Kern County's proposed biosolids ordinance. USEPA supports local oversight of biosolids application and we believe County agencies are best placed to implement biosolids regulations. However,we also believe the beneficial use of biosolids is an extremely important part of wastewater management,and local ordinances should encourage responsible use. Therefore we urge you to consider adopting a biosolids ordinance that is not unduly restrictive, given the many levels of protection already present in Kern County. We have outlined some of those levels of protection below. USEPA incorporated numerous safety factors into our biosolids standards in 40 CFR 503, such as evaluating the risk to someone who eats 200 milligrams per day of biosolids every day for 70 years. While there have been no documented cases of environmental problems when biosolids are applied in compliance with the standards,a number of recently published papers challenge the standards under various worst-case scenarios(for example uptake of pollutants from high metal-content biosolids by leafy vegetable food crops in highly acidic soils).In most cases, the exposure pathways in question were not the limiting pathways for the pollutants,and even if the numbers used in these pathway are revised,these would not become the limiting pathway and our final pollutant limits would not change. While USEPA's standards address reasonable worst case scenarios,there are a number of additional degrees of safety now in place in Kern County: -Kern County's original ordinance allows for application of biosolids meeting the"ceiling concentration"(cable 1)pollutant limits. The biosolids now being applied in Kern County have I pollutant concentrations well under both the ceiling concentration limits and the more stringent (Table 3)limits required for"exceptional quality"biosolids. In fact,most have concentrations that are less than 113 of the exceptional quality (Table 3)limit. These low concentrations are due to effective industrial pretreatment programs which have succeeded in removing significant amounts of metals from waste streams,prior to discharge to the municipal sewer system. -all the biosolids now being applied in Kem County meet the "exceptional quality"criteria for vector attraction reduction (vector attraction reduction is achieved before leaving the wastewater treatment plant). -the soils in Kem County are not highly acidic, so concerns raised regarding pollutant migration in highly acidic soils are not relevant here. -in most of the areas where biosolids are being applied,there is a large depth to groundwater, so even if biosolids were overapplied,they would not threaten groundwater. -biosolids are being applied to land used for feed and fiber crops, as opposed to food crops. Most of the land receiving biosolids are very marginal and will never be used for food crops such as leafy vegetables. -USEPA's site and harvesting restrictions for Class B biosolids (those that have achieved a significant level of pathogen reduction but not complete pathogen elimination)were designed to to account for rates of pathogen die-off in moist,humid areas of the country. The and conditions in Kem County should ensure much more rapid pathogen die-off rates. The proposed ordinance would only allow for application of "exceptional quality" biosolids; i.e. biosolids which meet three criteria: the most stringent pollutant concentrations in 40 CFR 503 (fable 3), a vector attraction reduction (VAR) level achieved at the wastewater treatment plant (as opposed to in the field), and"Class A" (complete)pathogen reduction. As noted above, all the biosolids now being applied on unincorporated lands in Kem County meet the Table 3 pollutant criteria, and it is the goal of our Office's pretreatment program to see these levels upheld. While your original ordinance would have allowed biosolids exceeding these limits, we would look favorably on an ordinance which requires biosolids to meet the Table 3 limits. The treatment plants applying biosolids in Kem County also run their stabilization processes to meet VAR criteria at the plant. To achieve the third criterion for"exceptional quality biosolids", biosolids which have already been treated at the wastewater plant to significantly reduce pathogens to"Class B"levels must be treated further to fully reduce pathogens to"Class A"levels. (This has traditionally been done by composting or long-term drying,but there are several other processes on the market now.) Obviously, Class A levels must be achieved if the product is going to be used directly on food crops or in a home garden. However, when biosolids are used for non-food crops in areas not used by the general public,the environmental costs of achieving Class A levels may outweigh the benefits in the following ways: . i transport of biosolids to compost or other treatment facilities operations and then from the facility to the land application areas substantially increases overall vehicular traffic. -most Class A treatment processes reduce nitrogen levels considerably,reducing the fertilizer value of the biosolids. - a few Class A processes actually add metals or other pollutants as part of the treatment process, increasing the concentration in the final product. - some Class A processes consume significant amounts of energy. If Kern County chooses to ban application of Class B biosolids, the Southern California municipalities now applying in Kem County will have to choose between treatment to Class A or other more expensive and environmentally questionable alternatives: hauling further distances (in many cases, through Kern County),or adding organic,nitrogen-rich material to landfills. Biosolids which are Class B with respect to pathogens and which are otherwise exceptional quality are now being used to enhance marginal agricultural lands in Kern County. If the farmers do not have access to these biosolids,they may opt to reclaim lands with manures or other waste-derived soil amendments that do not receive the same level of regulatory oversight, or choose not to reclaim these marginal areas. We urge you to consider an ordinance which allows for Class B, otherwise exceptional quality biosolids on sites subject to approval by the County's Resource Management Agency (RMA). In deciding whether to approve a site for use of Class B biosolids, the RMA could then factor in the criteria of concern, such as whether public access restrictions are adequate,if the land will be used for food crops in the near future or ever, if there is shallow groundwater at the site, if there are endangered or threatened species in the vicinity that would be adversely impacted by the application, and whether there are aesthetic concerns at the site in question. The RMA has already put a considerable amount of work into an ordinance that would address these question, and this effort should be continued. As you know,the California State Water Resources Control Board is now developing a General Order for Biosolids that will also provide additional degrees of safety for biosolids applications. It addresses tracking for background soils quality, nutrient balancing, addressing _ plant phytotoxicity and impacts to special status biological species, and provides the means to ensure public access restrictions. Our office is sending the RMA and the County Counsel our database on pollutant levels, pathogen and vector attraction reduction and toxic organic pollutants in biosolids which are applied in Kern County, and would be glad to assist the County in any way with obtaining data on these treatment plants' biosolids operations and quality,and on their compliance with the Federal standards. - I would be glad to discuss this issue further with you at your convenience. I can be reached at(415)744-1905. Technical questions can be addressed to Lauren Fondahl of my staff at (415) 744-1909. Sincerely,11/ ,,f/J�//(�/ �C7"— `�^ 'Me2,,t Daniel A.Meer,Chief Office of Clean Water Act Compliance cc: Jim Stahl,Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Raymond Kearney,City of Los Angeles Blake Anderson, Orange County Sanitation Districts Paul Giboney,Kern Food Growers Against Sewage Sludge Karen Miller,US Fish and Wildlife Service I>,-(V20 C r r , �,- PMONTHLY UPDATE SOUTHERN CAUFORNIAALLIN CE OF PUBLICLY ONINED TREATMENT WORKS Seotem er. 1999 Upcoming Meetings A Message from the Executive Director... Air Quality Meeting—Wednesday, And in the end, it was $60 worth of oranges and September 15, 1999 from 10 a.m. to grapefruit that provided the final clues that solved the 12 noon at LACSD. mystery. Board of Directors —TBA Most of our membership is probably aware that several miles of beaches in Huntington Beach —'Surf City" —had Biosolids Committee —TBA been closed to the public since July 1. Many of you are also aware that, up until a few days ago, a leaking sewer system Water Issues Committee —TBA was the primary suspect in a conundrum that baffled some of the best brains in sewerdom. As those of you that live or work in Orange Country already know, this issue bumped coverage of the proposed El Toro Airport off the front page. And that's no small feat since the money spent by both sides of the airport issue is starting to equal its actual construction cost. But I digress. In the paragraphs following this column, OCSD's Blake Anderson provides a summary of what occurred during these last three months, which for much of it, must have seemed like"The Huntington Beach Witch Project" - supernatural forces must have been at work because they kept looking and looking and couldn't find any problem with the sewer system. Obviously, a lot more than $60 was spent trying to find the source of the problem, which as we go to press, does seem to be because of non-point sources flowing out of the Talbert Marsh. Much of this cost, however, such as cleaning and inspecting sewer lines, is money well spent in that a very thorough cleaning and inspection benefits everyone. But for the merchants whose business was decimated by the lack of beachgoers, and for the City, which has seen its image as the premier beach sports center tarnished, there is no comfort in that thought. And for OCSD, an organization that is an acknowledged leader in our industry and is respected for its extensive work with environmental groups, it must seem a particularly cruel blow to have "guilty until proven innocent" accepted without question by most of those observing the situation. Upon examination, it is the introduction of AB411 that caused this to go from a small beach closure over a matter of perhaps days, to one which lasted for two months and encompassed miles of shoreline during the most popular time period of the year. There is then, as Blake notes, two legitimate questions to be raised: What set of standards are appropriate to maintain public health and maintain reasonable public access to their beaches? The District and other ocean discharging POTWs are getting together to question whether AB 411 needs to be amended. The second question is: Should dry weather nuisance flows be diverted into the sanitary sewer system along the coast? And while many of you will read the following story and grin at the irony of oranges being so intrinsic to solving the mystery of the polluted beach; I also find great irony that the bugs that will affect us the most this year may not be those that lurk in the recesses of our computers. No, it is the ones that lurk in 3029D RANCHO 1AEJ0 ROAD,SUITE 113 . SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO.CA 92675 . PHONE 19191 4 8 9-76 7 6 . FAX (94914890150 Monthly Update 2 September, 1999 poorly constructed legislation and in the ubiquitous runoff that fouls the mouths of creeks and rivers throughout the Southland that may end up being the greater concern. Entomologically yours, Ray Miller Water Most Beaches Reopened — Non-Point Pollution Caused Closure As we went to press, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Orange County Sanitation District and a member of SCAP's Board of Directors, supplied us with this account of the events surrounding the extended closure of a large portion of the beach in Huntington Beach: Beginning in mid-June, elevated bacteria levels were seen along a portion of the beach near the outlet of the Santa Ana River. At first, because of the total and fecal coliform levels, it looked like the profile of a sewage problem. OCSD then began a wide scale investigation, initially concentrating on the sewage system serving the State Park system (beach restrooms, restaurants). Failing to find a problem here, but still realizing increasing bacteria (enterococcus) counts, officials from the Orange County Department of Health Services began closing portions of the beach on July 1 — by the end of August, 4.5 miles of the beach were restricted. The search was expanded to include the City's local sewer system and then ultimately, the District's 84" coastal main line that runs parallel to Pacific Coast Highway. To examine this line, the District diverted flow through a temporary bypass they constructed, and used physical and closed circuit television inspection. Again, nothing was found. In the course of the investigation, the District would use, in addition to the above two techniques, groundwater analysis and ground penetrating radar to conduct inspections of an ever widening area of the collection system. The conclusion: the systems examined were sound and incapable of leaking. During the last week of August, attention turned to the Talbert Marsh, which drains into the ocean in the vicinity of where the high bacteria counts occurred. Four things then happened: ♦ Discovered high bacteria counts from stormwater pump stations operated by the City of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange. • Construction dewatering from a nearby hotel project increased flow to the marsh by t million gallons per day. ♦ In June, the County of Orange redredged the exit channel from the marsh, allowing it to empty into the surf zone. ♦ Using $60 worth of oranges and grapefruit, OCSD demonstrated that the ocean currents brought flow from this area right to the center of the hot spot of highest bacterial readings. Monthly Update 3 September, 1999 Temporarily, the construction dewatering flow and the non-point nuisance flows are being diverted to the District's system. Since that time, bacterial counts are down to the cleanest levels in months. Another issue that played a major role in the situation was AB411. This legislation, which requires health officials to not only post a warning if even a single water sample exceeds standards for total or fecal coliform or enterococcus, also provides that the beach be closed if sewage is suspected as the cause of a high reading. It should be noted that at the time the majority of beaches were closed, the total and feral coliforms levels had dropped significantly, however the level and distribution of enterococcus levels continued to grow. To provide some measure of the effect of AB411. OCSD examined sampling results from June 1998 through August 1999. While that analysis had not been completed by press time, preliminary indications were that under the old standards, there would have been 5 exceedances. Had AB411 standards been applied effective June 1998, there would SCAP Welcomes New Members have been 100 exceedances. Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Proposed NPDES Permitting Subcommittee Meets at Agency, the City of Riverside and Inland CASA Meeting Empire Utilities Agency were welcomed into the SCAP family. Water Chair Bob Ghirelli arranged for several SCAP Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater member agency representatives to meet with Larry Walker Agency will be represented by Steve (Larry Walker&Associates) on August 12, to discuss the Schindler. formation of a permitting subcommittee similar to one that was set up within the Bay Area Dischargers Authority. LWA The City will be represented by Gail designed and implemented a computer database that Briggs McPherson. catalogues the varying types and sizes of discharges, watersheds and receiving waters, expiration and renewal Inland Empire Utilities Agency will be dates and permit conditions that are contained within the represented by Rich Atwater. NPDES permits received by their member agencies. Welcome! Bob noted that the SCAP area covers 6 RWQCBs in Southern California, and many POTWs are often left to their own devices to deal with complex issues with their Regional Board. The Subcommittee would provide a forum for the people with responsibility for negotiating and ensuring permit compliance. An opportunity to team with others, share ideas and strategies and reduce complexity would also be provided. Members in attendance were very supportive of this concept and a proposal will be developed further to be brought to the Board of Directors for their consideration. Small Victory Won in State 303(d1f305(b) Lawsuit The lawsuit that challenges the validity of the Impaired Water Body Listing (303d) and Water Quality Assessment Reports (305b) moved ahead in our favor when the judge denied a request by environmental interveners who asked that the previous 305(b) reports from 1975 be included in the Administrative Record. The judge said that each report stood alone and could not be placed in the record en mass. Monthly Update 4 September, 1999 Motions for Summary Judgement have been filed on two issues: The first concerns the "underground regulations" issue, where we contend that the State's use of informal guidelines violated the Administrative Procedures Act. The second questions whether the State followed Clean Water Act requirements when producing the 305(b) Report. Biosolids Synagro Obtains Court Permission to Temporarily Continue to Operate Biosolids Facilitv Last month, Synagro Technologies was ordered to cease the importation of biosolids and bulking agents to their Riverside County facility due to odor complaints received from residents of a nearby housing development. Several SCAP member agencies send their biosolids to this site for processing. Under a 1996 Conditional Use Permit negotiated with the Riverside County Department of Co-Chairs Appointed to Biosolids Committee Environmental Health's Local Enforcement Agency, Synagro agreed to reduce or cease operations at Anne Briggs of Eastern Municipal Water District and their site in the event LEA staff substantiated that the Mike Sullivan of Los Angeles County Sanitation odors complained of by the residents originated at District have agreed to act as co-chairs of the SOAP their facility. On July 13, Synagro had been ordered Biosolids Committee. to reduce operations from 500 tons per day of Anne can be reached at(909) 928-3777 and Mike biosolids received, down l0 250 tpd; by July 27, 1999 is available at (562) 699-7411 x2824. Thank you they were down to 0. Anne and Mlkel Synagro disobeyed the order and kept accepting biosolids; filing a request for a restraining order against the County. On August 3, a temporary restraining order was granted, allowing them to resume their 500 tpd operations. At an August 31 hearing however, the Judge reduced this level down to 2501pd, but delayed his final decision. The final decision is expected within 30 days. Draft Statewide Biosolids EIR Review Comments Due November 9 Comments on the draft Statewide Biosolids EIR, which assesses the environmental impacts of the revised waste discharge requirements being proposed by the SWRCB for land application of biosolids in California, are due at the state by Tuesday, November 9. SCAP members are working with CASA/Tri- TAC to coordinate comments on the draft document. The draft EIR identifies "environmentally superior alternatives"and recommends extensive mitigation measures in order to reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Public hearings have been conducted on the EIR in Palmdale, Bakersfield and Sacramento. The meetings were sparsely attended. However, opposition to biosolids applications was voiced at all meetings. Kem County Biosolids Ordinance Status A public hearing on the Negative Declaration for the proposed Biosolids Ordinance will be held on Tuesday, October 5 by the Kern Board of Supervisors. There is the possibility that the Board could take action on October 12 to approve the Biosolids Ordinance, which would severely restrict the type of biosolids that can be applied, and impose significant new fees. SCAP Biosolids Committee members are reviewing options they can pursue to address these issues. Monthly Update 5 September, 1999 Air New Wrinkle in Risk Management Program A recently enacted Senate bill (S880) affects three areas of the federal RMP regarding accidental releases of hazardous materials: ♦ Propane removed from Risk Management List —While propane is no longer on the federal list, digester gas may still be covered due to CalARP regulations (up to OES and/or the local AAs); definitely covered under OSHA's PSM program. ♦ To reduce the risk from terrorist obtaining sensitive information, data submitted in the RMP will not be available under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for one year. ♦ Each facility covered by the RMP regulations must hold a public meeting by February 1, 2000 to describe and discuss the local implications of the RMP that was submitted on June 21, 1999. The facility operator must certify to the FBI by June 5, 2000 that such a meeting has been held. SCAP Portable Equipment Permitting Workshop Explains Key Issues Portable equipment, that is any equipment that is not attached to a foundation or that doesn't remain at a single location for more than 12 consecutive months and is self-propelled, is subject to regulation by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). This includes non-road engines such as outdoor power equipment, recreational, farm, construction, and lawn and garden equipment; as well as marine vessels, locomotives and aircraft. Also included are land-based Part 89 diesel engines and small <25 hp spark ignition engines (large spark-ignition engines are not regulated, however units larger than 50 hp that were manufactured prior to 1990 will not be allowed to be used at all). The CARB statewide program issues permits that are valid for three consecutive years and covers engines and equipment separately, and requires that CARB be notified when the engine is moved, even to another spot within your facility. Because new and old engines must meet the most stringent standards, it is anticipated that retrofits or replacements will be required. It was noted that any units larger than 50 hp should be registered with CARB to avoid permitting issues with the SCAQMD. The cost of permitting these engines through the state is 1/3 the AQMD's fee. Also noted was that if SCAQMD has already permitted an engine of yours, and you operate it longer than five consecutive days at a single location, it may trigger an environmental justice action against your agency. Copies of the presentation handouts from the workshop are available from the SCAP office. Non Sequitur "You can employ men and hire hands to work for you, but you must win their hearts to have them work with you." - Tioho THE KIPLINGER WASHINGTON LETTER Cimd",d makiy m bwima limb Al 1923—Hd.T6,Na 33 THE KIPUNGER WASHWGTON EDITORS 1729 H SL,NW,Wad:mgmo DC 20D06-3939 Dear Client: Washington, Aug. 20, 1999 Droughts come 6 go, but water issues will constantly get tougher. r Water is a big concern for industry: Agriculture. Paper mills. Food processing. Electric power. Residential development. Chemicals. Cost and availability issues ripple through the national economy. I 1 Water will cost more. ..up about 6% a year over the next 10 years. Why? Rising demand due to population growth and the steady flow i of Americans to water-guzzling suburbs and water-short Sunbelt states. By 2020, the U.S. will use about 9 billion more gallons of water per day. Shrinking supplies as salt water seeps into coastal aquifers and as environmental fears curb new dam construction, end use of old ones. Aging infrastructure will need $325 billion in upgrades by 2020. And costly Rov't regulations: Safe drinking water standards. Fish and wildlife protections. Preservation of scenic rivers. And more. Conflicts over water will escalate in both number and intensity. Farmers will be squaring off against users who want to tap "their" water. Environmentalists vs. developers. State vs. state. Rural vs. urban. Fla. and the West will be the focus of the most-heated fights. A dozen Fla. counties, Calif., Colo., Nev., Ariz. are already embroiled. i Mid- and S.E. Atlantic, New England, Southern Plains will be next as periodic droughts and escalating environmental curbs strain supplies. Water shortages will curb growth in some Sunbelt communities. Public waterworks will be sold or outsourced.. .operations shifted to private companies rather than having govlt agencies do needed upgrades. Private operators figure they can consolidate several smaller utilities, capture efficiencies of scale and turn a profit despite regulated rates. Contractors service Atlanta and other cities, and most N.J. residents. Some private firms are betting on the future deregulation of water and opportunities for profit. . .following path of natural gas, electricity. Tiered fees will catch on. Higher for peak seasons, big users. iAnd water trading, both on an emergency basis and routinely. Surplus areas will bank, sell and ship water to regions with shortfalls. Plus interlocking water-supply networks, similar to power grids, which will allow easy transfers of water, especially within water basins. Reuse of water will be encouraged, even rewired, by local govIts. Capturing, purifying storm water. Separate pipelines for recycled water. New conservation and reuse technologies will emerge, be adopted. Better filters to catch impurities. Desalinating using electrodialysis. Water purification with ultraviolet radiation and use of bioremediation. Low-pressure drip irrigation. Cleaning systems that use air, not water. Bottom line: Big changes in how water is used, sold, regulated. M1 bMPx/Nalslmx®mbWewgbPMl�pWxw,7„",�, ad6011�'I aall6[ @6m0154se6i,Fa�iT pM1xlVbla"m lma nexx x"xw oc�®wwbx,a,m,"wam FAeaa YIN1"lfNl: a.mlflda2 i4 ffi1a®1& Nawsa Ya.AumP"M1 xppxwMut rar m,r.usm FwN xb,@Rpiwmn:s Ml9N wcYA'q"mi Strong demand for U.S. waterworks equipment abroad. . .good market for everything from pumps and drilling gear to water treatment supplies. In Latin America, Mexico, Peru and Ecuador are among countries with big plans to improve their water systems. Also, Trinidad 6 Tobago. In the Middle East, Saudi Arabia wants new desalination plants ready by 105. Bahrain seeks recycling. Syria plans irrigation systems. And elsewhere. . .India will be focused on wastewater treatment.. Ditto for Spain and Indonesia. Algeria will up spending on irrigation. Bottled-water sales will sumo 10% this year to $4.3 billion. . . over 13 gallons per American per year. Gains will be about 7% annually now to 104. It's the fastest-growing part of U.S. beverage industry. U.S. bottled-water exports will tog $100 million in a few years, from $80 million now. Top customers: Canada, Japan, Bahamas, Bermuda, Colombia, Brazil, Hong Kong, Singapore and S. Korea. Long-term growth will be in Asia and Latin America as incomes in those areas rise. An u date on Drospects for key in American economies: Me co will lead the region, gg about 3.5% next year. That will fo ow 3% expansion in 199, ks largely to trade w U.S. and U.S. investment in auto, car partsparel and electroni plants. Brazil i Pullingout of a recon. ..will grow 2% X in 2000. Devaluation is bo ting exports of fards, electronic , aerospace. Ar entina w 1 sta in the souown 3% in '9 and a 1% drop in 2000. Investors try about Oct. eions and po Bible devaluation. Russia and China oast of a neliance. .exchanging bear hugs. Raises concern about a coa tion aimedount ing U.S. interests.Both resent rise in .S. owerce iet Union bit the dust. And they strongly opposed NAT action slavia's Kosovo province. China doesn't want similar "oude inrence" in Taiwan or Tibet.Russia has the same concerns ae i deaith rebels in the Caucasus.But lop -standin disa ree tl chill their relationshi despite warm official pronouncements Border disputes are unsettled, Chinese are migrating to Siberia a R sians fear a stronger China. Russia's weakness makes it play unacc armed second fiddle to China. Trade between the two a ittan considering the potential of a resource-rich Russia and a labor-rich inn. Deals with the U.S. dwarf China's trade with Ru is, which is too oor to buy from anyone. Fact is economic ealit kegs both f m becoming too hostile. Outlook for wiZe, sales and services is ad this year. The ski indu will boost advertisingto em sagging sales. It will be targets to 35-to-50-y ear- olds, who pack t ick wallets. Snowboard will lead a ui went sales. ..dowahil ski sales flat. New twin-tipped erformance skis and supershort skis wil gain market. Cross ount skim will be strong, including re rt packages. But weak a pment sales...folks renting or staying with wh they have. S bile sales will be off a ain.. .the fourth year a row. UnZ—Good d will dip below 230,000 this winter, down from 260,0 in '97. nowblower sales million, half what was spent in '9 '96. deals for winter clothing shoppers because of compecit n ampliers. Nearly everything will be waterproof and breathable. New fabrics will make for warmer, lighter and easier-to-store garments. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region 'Winston H.Hkkaz inn el Admen: evplly-wwswce.a govi-.w9c68 Cm'mvs Se.'je, 3737 Main Soot S.lw500,81venode,Cali fomia 93501-3339C�p �S En r"onal'. Phone(909)1824130 3 FAX(909)791 fi388 P'h""oa — 13oMD Lo t-rEL -GN taV"l _y AcSg - V 111=0 September 10, 1999 Assembly Member Scott Baugh Assembly Member Ken Maddox 67' Assembly District 68' Assembly District State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Assembly Member Lou Correa Assembly Member Marilyn Brewer 69'n Assembly District 70"Assembly District State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Assembly Member Bill Campbell Assembly Member Dick Ackerman 710 Assembly District 72ne Assembly District State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Assembly Member Patricia Bates 73' Assembly District Stale Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: NPDES ORDER NO. 99.11, GENERAL WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFOs) WITHIN THE SANTA ANA REGION Dear Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen: Thank you for your August 19, 1999 letter concerning the consideration of tentative Board Order No. 99-11, general waste discharge requirements for concentrated animal feeding operations (mainly dairies) within the Santa Ana Region, by the Regional Board on August 20, 1999. We appreciate your interest in this very important matter, and we applaud the commitment expressed in your letter of ensuring that the water being consumed by your constituents and neighbors is of the highest quality possible. The Regional Board adopted Order No. 99-11 and Cease and Desist Order No. 99-65 at their meeting on August 20". Order No. 99-11 contains a number of important provisions necessary to bring the Chino Basin dairy industry into compliance with the California Environmental Protection Agency Honorable Members of the Assembly - 2 - September 10. 1999 Santa Ana Region Basin Plan and state and federal law. The Order includes a prohibition on the use of manure within the Santa Ana Region wherever ambient water quality does not meet the water quality standards established in the Basin Plan (necessary for the Order to be in compliance with the California Water Code). It also includes a requirement that all CAFOs within the Region must prepare and implement an approved Engineered Waste Management Plan that identifies how each facility will retain waste products on site in conformance with Order No. 99-11. Another provision of the Order is that all manure generated at each facility must be removed within 180 days of being removed from corrals. In addition, Order No. 99-65 requires that previously stockpiled dairy wastes be removed from facilities by the end of 2001. Order No. 99-11 contains a number of provisions that have been included in previous dairy waste discharge requirements, as well as a number of new requirements. The industry has not established a very good track record of compliance with previous discharge requirements, and we expect that this new Order will provide additional challenges to CAFO operators. However, there should be no question that the Order, as adopted, is necessary for compliance with both federal and state laws. In fact, at the hearing to consider Order No. 99-11. both the Western United Dairymen and the Milk Producers Council expressed support for the Order, with the exception of the 2-year requirement to remove previously stockpiled manure from facilities. Over the years, dairies have increased the concentrations of dairy animals per acre within the basin to the point where they no longer have adequate acreage to properly manage their waste products. The following information illustrates that point. Data included in monitoring reports that the CAFOs are required to transmit to the Regional Board revealed that during 1997, the number of dairies in the Chino Basin declined by ten percent. However, during that same period, the number of dairy cattle within the basin actually increased by ten percent. Further, for about one-third of the Chino Basin dairies, the absence of adequate flood control infrastructure makes compliance with water quality regulations very difficult. This situation has come about with the intense development in the Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga areas, from which storm water runoff is tributary to the dairy area. As these areas have developed, flood control infrastructure has lagged far behind. The local jurisdictions have begun to take some steps to rectify this situation, but much more needs to be done before enough storm water runoff is diverted from the dairy areas to allow storm water management control at all individual facilities to become effective. Finally, staff appreciates the Legislature's augmentation of resources for the State and Regional Boards to address our backlog of inspections. This will allow us to provide increased compliance assistance to CAFOs, and appropriate enforcement, when necessary. Again, thank you for your interest in this very important matter. Please California Environmental Protection Agency j Rnn d'd Pr.Re. Honorable Members of the Assembly - 3 - September 10, 1999 contact me at (909) 782-3284 with any questions or comments concerning CAFOs within the Santa Ana Region. Sincerely, Ger'84 J. Thibeault Executive Officer cc. Regional Board Winston Hickox, Cal/EPA Walt Pettit, Executive Director, SWRCB Alexis Strauss, U.S. EPA Dan Meer, U.S. EPA Bob Feenstra, Milk Producers Council Gary Conover, Western United Dairymen John Borges, Western United Dairymen B2Bill ills, Orange County Water District v Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District V) California Environmental Protection Agency 101 Rrcickd Papn BOARD OF DIRECTORS MebngDaW To ad.of Dr. 9/22/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Nu.W !e R rn L Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A 14aM'Vaalwp OaVnS}VUW[Ne1VRFILEStlaimspnq We asu.a ExAe Page 1 ATTACHMENTS a 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 8/1/99 — 8/15/99 & 8/16/99—8/31/99. BA NMmWYa1Wp.CteNn41'PUWnEpe�WPFILESYIebnepeN.bc nerleen erxAe Page 2 Claims Paid From 811199 to 8116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 21194 RPI/Bio Gro 8 120.056.30 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 21195 Bristol Systems,Inc. 30.997.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 21196 Burch Ford 70,408.80 4 1999 Ford Taunts LX 21197 Carollo Engineers 67.431.53 Engineering Services-P2-43.3,J-254&Document Mgmt.Project 21198 Cooper Energy Services 68,459.38 Engine Supplies 21199 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 71,151.30 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 21200 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,179.84 Medical Insurance Premium 21201 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 36,722.63 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 21202 Lincoln-Recp Fullerton OPCO,L.L.C. 83,412.94 Connection Fee Refund 21203 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 49,991.77 LubricantlDiesel Fuel 21204 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 60,715.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21205 Ryland Homes Group of Southern CA 91.922.00 Connection Fee Refund 21206 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 97,319.75 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 21207 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 56,500.00 Research Project 21208 Southern California Edison 72,694.33 Power 21209 Stang Industrial Products 59,779.70 Digester Cleaning Monitor System 21210 SPEC Services, Inc. 259,159.24 Engineering Services J-33-1 21211 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 69.334.72 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21212 Union Dodge 43,756.20 2 1999 Dodge Quad Cab 21213 V&A Consulting Engineers 27,640.53 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 21214 Ark Construction Company 41,952.29 Construction P1-444 21215 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 248,768.40 Construction P2-65 21216 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2.031.27 Long Distance Telephone Service 21217 A Tint of Glass 75.00 Window Tinting 21218 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 172.50 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 21219 Air Liquids America Corporation 3,477.36 Specialty Gasses 21220 Airborne Express 21.75 Air Freight 21221 Allied Electronics,Inc. 183.99 Electrical Supplies 21222 Allied Supply Company 6.069.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 21223 Allied Systems/Supply Co. 5.384.19 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 21224 American Airlines 12.968.39 Travel Services 21225 American Computer&Comm. 149.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 21226 Ponton Industries 377.13 Instrument Parts&Supplies 21227 Analysts,Inc. 1,660.69 Testing Kits 21228 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 600.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 21229 Applied Industrial Technology 101.70 Electrical Parts&Supplies 21230 Amror Vac Sweeping Service 520.00 Vacuum Truck Services 21231 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal 21232 Associated Readymix Concrete 334.83 Concrete 21233 ASR Analysis 890.00 Vibration Analysis 5-41-1 Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21234 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Service 21235 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 21.66 Telephone Service 21236 AT&T Wireless Service 3,970.37 Cellular Telephone Service 21237 AT&T Wireless Service 3,012.06 Cellular Telephone Service 21238 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 21239 Barnes&Noble Books 146.68 Publication 21240 Battelle-Northwest 14,816.00 Contract Services-Soil Testing 21241 Battery Specialties 1,374.12 Batteries 21242 BicMerleux Vitek, Inc. 10,935.24 Lab Supplies 21243 BioSpheriwl Instruments, Inc. 201.65 Instrument Mainl. 212" Black Box Corporation 835.65 Computer Supplies 21245 Boise Radiator Service 86.00 Truck Repairs 21246 Brizina&Associates 136.42 Lab Supplies 21247 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1.780.00 Pump Supplies 21248 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 727.91 Service Agreement 21249 California Automatic Gate 149.48 Service Agreement 21250 California Relocation Services, Inc. 236.25 Moving Services 21251 Calolympic Safety 90.63 Safety Supplies 21252 Airgas Dry Ice 43.10 Lab Supplies 21253 Centropointe Commercial Interiors 1.684.82 Office Furniture 21254 Charles P.Crowley Co. 131.52 Instrument Parts 21255 City of Fountain Valley 15.648.88 Water Use 21256 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 1,760.69 Professional Services-Ergonomic 21267 Cole Scientific 77.34 Lab Services 21258 Compensation&Benefit Assn of San Diego 685.00 Subscription 21259 Compressor Components Of California 1,293.00 Pump Supplies 21280 Computers America,Inc. 1,607.76 Computer Supplies 21261 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,387.71 Electrical Supplies 21262 Continental-McLaughlin 94.57 Hardware 21283 Corporate Express 2,317.44 Office Supplies 21264 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,995.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 21265 Cotelligent 2.320.75 Professional Services-Computer 21268 County of Orange 35.00 Permit Fees 21267 County Wholesale Electric Co. 408.40 Electrical Supplies 21208 Cytec Industries 2.413.39 Anionic Polymer Spec.No. 9798-18 21269 CEM Corporation 1,425.60 Lab Supplies 21270 CMS, Inc. 4.364.60 Investigation Service 21271 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 140.46 Lab Supplies 21272 CR&R,Inc. 1.910.00 Container Rentals 21273 CWEA Membership 1.235.00 Membership 21274 Day-Timers,Inc. 27.74 Office Supplies Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From BMI99 to 8116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21275 Del Mar Analytical 3,306.00 Biosolids Analysis 21278 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 3,231.43 2 Computer Workstations 21277 Delta Foam Products 118.18 Lab Supplies 21278 DeZurlk C/O Misco/SouthWest 7,631.39 Valves 21279 Don Meurer 8.300.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 21280 DMG-Maximus 2,200.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan 21281 Electronic Transmission Smog System 18.90 Electrical Supplies 21282 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 21283 Environmental Resources Associates 1,032.80 Lab Supplies 21284 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,321.32 Professional Services-Legislative 21285 Fast Company 19.75 Subscription 21286 Faxpress, Inc. 258.98 Office Supplies 21287 FedEx Corporation 190.46 Air Freight 21288 Fibertron 5,679.64 Fiber Optic Cable 21289 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 8,720.49 Lab Supplies 21290 Forma Systems,Inc. 6.280.00 Professional Services-Geographical Information System Project 21291 Fountain Valley Camara 13.74 Photo Supplies 21292 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 352.50 Truck Wash Tickets 21293 Franklin Covey 62.60 Office Supplies 21294 Fry's Electronics 388.56 Computer Supplies 21295 City of Fullerton 358.11 Water Use 21296 General Electric Supply Company 174.74 Electric Parts 21297 Garratt-Callahan Company 2.395.55 Chemicals 21298 Gates Fiberglass Installers 998.87 Fiberglass Repair 21299 GTE California 1,807.05 Telephone Services 21300 Gefinge Castle 487.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 21301 Gierich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,892.32 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 21302 Glenn's Tackle Shop 724.55 Lab Supplies 21303 WW Grainger,Inc. 1,180.36 Compressor Supplies 21304 Graybar Electric Company 425.62 Electrical Supplies 21305 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 733.01 Janitorial Supplies 21308 Hacker Equipment Company 812.11 Truck Supplies 21307 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 21308 Harvard Business Review 95.00 Subscription 21309 Hatch 8 Kirk,Inc. 176.63 Truck Supplies 21310 Hewlett-Packard 1,712.73 Lab Supplies 21311 HIM,Inc. 381.66 Toole 21312 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 450.00 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning 21313 Home Depot 26.64 Small Hardware 21314 Hopkins Technical Products 310.93 Pump Supplies 21315 City of Huntington Beach 11.686.89 Water Use Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21316 Imaging Plus,Inc. 487.23 Office Supplies 21317 StateNet 400.00 Online Service 21318 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 188.27 Lab Supplies 21319 Irvine Photo Graphics 5.58 Photographic Services 21320 Irvine Ranch Water District 22.64 Water Use 21321 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 157.76 Safety Supplies 21322 Jay's Catering 466.04 Catering Services 21323 Jensen Instrument Co. 910.62 Instrument Supplies 21324 Johnstone Supply 2,453.37 Electrical Supplies 21325 Joint Instrumentation Committee 180.00 Registration 21326 Kabbara Engineering 3,446.60 Professional Services-Traffic Control 21327 Industrial Distribution Group 3,166.91 Tools 21328 Lab Support 3,994.94 Temporary Employment Services 21329 LaserAll Corp. 1,149.51 Printer Service Agreement 21330 Lee&Ro,Inc. 7,177.36 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 21331 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1.868.44 Architectural Services 21332 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 16,117.38 Engineering Services 2-37 21333 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,519.21 Mechanical Supplies 21334 Mandolin Publishing 195.00 Subscription 21335 Mar Vac Electronics 41.07 Instrument Supplies 21338 MasTec Network Services 5.000.00 Communication Service 21337 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1,085.47 Plumbing Supplies 21338 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.118.54 Tools 21339 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 6,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch Site Study 21340 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 684.99 Mechanical Repairs 21341 Mission Uniform Service 3,566.52 Uniform Rentals 21342 Motion Industries 324.73 Pump Supplies 21343 MotoPhoto 75.15 Photographic Services 21344 Nasco 292.54 Instrument Supplies 21345 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services 21346 Neal Supply Co. 2,476.30 Plumbing Supplies 21347 Oceans'99 495.00 Subscription 21348 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,726.93 Office Supplies 21349 Optic Software 15.575.00 Document Design Service 21350 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 124.94 Plumbing Supplies 21351 Orange County Vector Control District 1.578.82 Pest Control 21352 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 134.29 Electrical Supplies 21353 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 457.01 Fillings 21354 Osftech 309.00 Computer Supplies 21355 Oxygen Service Company 1.580.29 Specialty Gases 21358 OCB Reprographics 20,818.42 Printing Service-Spec P-173 Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 811/99 to 0/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21357 Pacific Bell 18.93 Telephone Services 21358 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 21359 Padflc Mechanical Supply 214.59 Plumbing Supplies 21360 Parkhouse Tire Co. 2,162.13 Tires 21361 Parts Unlimited 837.57 Truck Supplies 21362 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 8,899.28 Engineering Service-Sewer Repair 21363 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,182.18 Filters 21364 Pius Hut of America,Inc. 291.00 Catering Services 21366 Polydyne,Inc. 24,203.08 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 21368 Powerware 34.72 Publication 21367 Primary Source 12,408.68 Office Furniture 21366 Quad Knopf,Inc. 1,209.40 Professional Services-Tule Ranch Site Study 21389 COS,L.L.C. 258.82 Investment Management Program Service 21370 Reliastar 7.808.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 21371 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.041.16 Life Insurance Premium 21372 Remedy Temp 3,138.54 Temporary Employment Services 21373 RPM Electric Motors 1,165.07 Electric Motor Repair 21374 IRS Hughes Co, Inc. 65.72 Paint Supplies 21375 Safelite Glass Corp. 362.78 Auto Supplies 21376 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 296.58 Mechanical Supplies 21377 Schwing America,Inc. 8,794.19 Pump Supplies 21378 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 490.00 Lab Repairs 21379 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 5,060.86 Professional Services-Ocean OuHall Instrumentation 21380 Second-Sun 803.92 Light Fixtures 21381 Sewer Equipment Co.of Florida, Inc. 1,003.50 Sewer Pipe Supplies 21382 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 898.77 Toole 21383 Shepherd Machinery Co. 349.37 Truck Supplies 21384 Shopping.Com 28.41 Communication Equipment 21385 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 37.00 Tools/Hardware 21386 Siemon, Larsen 8 Marsh 1.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 21387 Supelco,Inc. 1,260.48 Lab Supplies 21388 Smith Pipe 3 Supply,Inc. 185.32 Plumbing Supplies 21389 So.Col.Gas Company 640.97 Natural Gas 21390 SoftView Computer Products 399.30 Computer Supplies 21391 SoltCholce 3,463.55 Software 21392 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 310.20 Emission Fees 21393 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 1,012.64 Meter 21394 Starbuck Truck Refinishing,Inc. 606.00 Painting Service 21395 State Board Of Equalization 288.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 21396 StudioVisia 13,520.00 Computer Consulting Services 21397 Summit Steel 2,117.44 Metal Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 811199 to 8115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21398 Sunset Ford 159.30 Truck Supplies 21399 Sunset Industrial Parts 22.61 Mechanical Supplies 21400 Solar Turbines, Inc. 1,539.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 21401 Taylor-Dunn 6,412.88 Electric Cart Parts 21402 Telemedia, Inc. 797.75 Training Software 21403 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis 21404 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 199.60 Mechanical Supplies 21405 Time Wainer Communications 40.47 Cable Services 21406 Tony's Look&Safe Service&Sales 28.02 Locks&Keys 21407 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 80.00 Seminar Registration 21408 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 1,800.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 21409 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 252.91 Truck Supplies 21410 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 130.00 Lab Services 21411 Ultra Scientific 216.73 Lab Supplies 21412 Union Bank of California 1,443.73 Banking Services 21413 United Parcel Service 42.92 Parcel Services 21414 Unocal 76 92.59 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 21415 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 350.00 Registration 21416 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,340.86 Plumbing Supplies 21417 Veme's Plumbing 460.00 Plumbing Supplies 21418 Village Nurseries 48.99 Landscaping Supplies 21419 VCl Mechanical 385.00 Line Leak Detector Installation 21420 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,723.30 Lab Supplies 21421 Waters Corporation 495.00 Subscription 21422 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 5,990.90 Safety Supplies 21423 Western States Chemical, Inc. 17,660.77 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 21424 Wiley-VCH Veriag GmbH 135.96 Publication 21425 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 7,759.91 Instrument Supplies 21426 Xerox Corporation 15,035.18 Copier Leases 21427 3T Equipment Company 16,283.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 21428 Brown&Caldwell 21.408.85 Engineering Service Pt-37 21429 Systems Integrated 5,115.75 Construction Services J-31-3 21430 Thomas M.Flanagan 158.23 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 21431 Roland T. McReynolds 274.59 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21432 Daniel R.Tremblay 1.684.95 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 21433 County of Orange 465.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 21434 Orange County Sanitation District 1,472.91 Petty Cash Reimb. 21435 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 374.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee 21436 Orange County Sanitation District 455,176.36 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 21437 A-Plus Systems 4,977.32 Notices&Ads 21438 American Training Resources,Inc. 479.49 Training Materials Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/1/99 to 8/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21439 American Telephone 6 Telegraph Corp. 47.78 Telephone Service 21440 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 21441 Builders Book, Inc. 290.87 Publication 21442 Caesars Palace 1,657.89 Membership 21443 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 214" Colvis Industries 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 21445 CASA 180.00 Conference Registration 21446 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 22.38 Lab Supplies-Freight 21447 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 21448 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 21449 GTE California 539.42 Telephone Services 21450 Oak Fabco/Industrial Steam 2.828.92 Pump Supplies 21451 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Loral 601 1.702.89 Dues Deduction 21452 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety DM. 862.48 Safety Supplies 21453 Mar Vac Electronics 34.21 Instrument Supplies 21454 Mid-West Associates 13,024.34 Pump Supplies 21455 MSA-C/O Geoff Cobbeft 160.00 Membership 21456 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 200.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 21457 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 490.00 Training Registration-Computer 21458 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 21459 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 21460 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 338.38 Fittings 21461 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe 2.000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 21462 OCEA 609.02 Dues Deduction 21483 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 21464 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 21465 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction 21466 Red Valve Company, Inc. 2,160.05 Mechanical Supplies 21467 So.Cal.Gas Company 367.26 Natural Gas 21468 Southern California Edison 9,239.75 Power 21469 Southern California Edison 7,835.35 Power 21470 Sparling Instruments.Inc. 250.00 Meter 21471 State of California 142.10 Wage Garnishment 21472 Summit Steel 554.67 Metal 21473 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 21474 1999 Energy Efficiency Forum 890.00 Membership 21475 Layne T.Baroldi 245.73 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 21476 David A.Ludwin 460.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 21477 Douglas M.Stewart 545.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 21478 Jonathan K.Thomsic 190.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21479 Charles F.Winsor 1,007.67 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 811199 to 0115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21480 James L.Wybenga 248,07 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 21481 Orange County Sanitation District 3,941.00 Workers Camp. Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,823,713.41 Payroll Disbursements 15181 -15370 Employee Paychecks $ 257,420.31 Biweekly Payroll 8/11199 40397-40833 Direct Deposit Statements 644.732.08 Biweekly Payroll 8/11199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 902,152.37 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 151,140.59 August Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 161,339.98 August Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 133.056.63 August Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 2,509,554.79 Semiannual Principal&Interest Payment an 1990-92 Series A COP Chase Bank of Texas National Association 361.528.76 Semiannual Principal&Interest Payment on 1993 COP State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 2,206,575.90 Semiannual Principal&Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C COP Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 5,523,196.63 Total Claims Paid 811199-8115199 $ 9,249,062.41 Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 8M 6/99 to 8131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 21482 Great American Printing Co. $ 3,029.59 Tools 21483 Aldco Systems, Inc. 2,487.30 Electrical Supplies 21484 Air Cold Supply 42.68 Air Conditioner Repairs 21486 Air Products&Chemicals 23,451.95 0&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 21486 Alrbome Express 89.70 Air Freight 21487 Alabama Poultry&Egg Association 150.00 Registration 21488 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 108.00 Subscription 21489 Allied Supply 3,555.00 Registration 21490 Ambience Unlimited 200.00 Raggedy Ann&Andy-Kids Day 21491 American Compensation Assoc. 25.00 Membership 21492 American Public Works Association 100.00 Membership 21493 Anchor Paving 2,400.00 Manhole Repair 21494 Anicom, Inc. 1,265.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 21495 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 21496 Appleone Employment Service 8,344.50 Temporary Employment Services 21497 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 487.00 Vacuum Truck Services 21498 Arrs Disposal Service, Inc. 928.72 Waste Removal 21499 Atiands Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 21500 ABB Go Harold Wells Associates 4,501.39 Electrical Parts&Supplies 21601 AMA 395.00 Registration 21502 Westland Engineering C/O API BASCO 1,195.55 Mechanical Supplies 21503 ASAE 210.50 Publication 21504 ASR Analysis 782.00 Vibration Analysis 5-41-1 21505 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 44.91 Telephone Service 21606 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 760.00 Electrical Equipment Maint. 21507 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 2,150.00 Telephone Installation 21508 Barclays Law Publishers 60.00 Subscription 21509 Battery Specialties 632.79 Batteries 21510 Bauer Compressors 1,247.62 Safety Equipment Testing 21511 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 19.45 Lab Supplies 21512 Beta Technology,Inc. 2.580.37 Electrical Parts&Supplies 21513 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 20,645.42 Engineering Services-Can Gen Operating Philosophy Study 21514 Brinderson Corp. 2.170.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 21515 Bristol Systems,Inc. 11.603.76 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 21516 Business Objects Users Conference 1.690.00 Registration 21517 Buy.Com 2.608.76 Computer Supplies 21518 BOC Edwards 803.36 Lab Supplies 21519 Cal Protection 989.00 Electrical Services 21520 California Automatic Gale 1.657.28 Service Agreement 21521 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 6.229.78 Legal Service-Cartel Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16/99 to 8131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21622 Carleton Engineers 8 Consultants, Inc. 2.668.50 Engineering Services-Air Quality 21523 Carlton V. Philips,Jr. 90.00 Legal Service-Porter Plating 21524 Centrepointe Commercial Interlors 2,752.90 Office Furniture 21525 Chemical Transfer Company, Inc. 47.20 Freight 21526 Cincinnati Incorporated 3,001.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 21527 Compu Master 249.00 Registration 21528 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 38.18 Electrical Supplies 21529 Converse Consultants 2,894.80 Consulting Services 6-12 21530 Corporate Express 1,520.64 Office Supplies 21531 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 21532 Coat Containment Solutions 424.90 Worker's Comp.Services 21533 Cotelllgent 480.00 Professional Services-Computer 21634 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1,796.43 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 21535 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 802.46 Communication Equipment Repair 21536 County Wholesale Electric Co. 22.09 Electrical Supplies 21537 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 21538 CEM Corporation 311.40 Lab Supplies 21539 CH2MHIII 8,881.00 Engineering Services-Sulfide Control Demonstration Project 21540 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5.928.00 CCTV Inspection of Beach Sewers 21541 CR 5 R, Inc. 1.260.00 Container Rentals 21542 CWEA Annual Conference 220.00 Conference Registration 21543 Daily Pilot 100.00 Notices 8 Ads 21544 Dee Jaspers&Assoc. 4,543.46 Legal Services-Cartel 21545 Del Mar Analytical 248.00 Biosolids Analysis 21546 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 21.334.51 10 Computer Workstations 21547 DaZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 129.30 Valves 21548 Doorl America 670.00 Permit Fee Refund 21540 Thyssen Dover Elevator 2,532.67 Elevator Maintenance 21560 Embarcadero Technologies,Inc. 2.282.75 Software Maint.Agreement 21651 Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 21662 FedFx Corporation 76.57 Air Freight 21553 Flbertron 755.00 Fiber Optic Cable 21554 Fidelity Graphic Products 48.00 Office Supplies 21656 First American Title Insurance Company 400.00 Legal Service-Documentation 21556 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,484.90 Lab Supplies 21557 Flo-Systems, Inc. 585.97 Pump Supplies 21558 Forestry Suppliers 52.57 Lab Supplies 21559 Fountain Valley Camera 81.08 Photo Supplies 21560 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 695.00 Truck Wash Tickets 21561 Fry's Electronics 707.98 Computer Supplies 21562 Ganahl Lumber Company 400.09 Lumber/Hardware Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 8116199 to 8131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21663 GTE California 6.455.46 Telephone Services 21564 Gigs Information Group, Inc. 15,099.00 Membership 21565 Glenn's Tackle Shop 74.27 Lab Supplies 21566 Graseby S.T.I. 566.00 Engine Supplies 21567 Greylur Electric Company 5.261.46 Electrical Supplies 21568 H.R.Macklin&Sons, Inc. 4.000.00 Professional Service-Land Appraisal 21569 Hamilton Company 277.20 Lab Supplies 21570 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 21671 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 3.081.36 Maim.Services-Sewer Cleaning 21572 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium 21573 Home Depot 246.19 Small Hardware 21574 Horizon High Reach 3,900.00 Safety Compliance Training 21575 Hydrotex . 4,476.69 Luba Oil 21576 Industrial Air Compressor 778.22 Equipment Rental 21577 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 219.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 21578 Information Resources 710.00 Personnel Services 21579 Irvine Photo Graphics 34.73 Photographic Services 21680 Irvine Ranch Water District 47.46 Water Use 21581 IBM Corp. 2,093.80 Maint.Agreement 21582 IBM Corporation 10,000.00 Professional Service-Internet Vulnerability 21583 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. $05.68 Safety Supplies 21584 ISATECH11999 525.00 Registration 21585 ISI lnfortext 1,652.80 Subscription 21586 J&B Auto Parts 45.06 Auto Parts&Supplies 21687 J.O'Brien Company, Inc. 854.22 Computer Supplies 21588 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 1,530.00 Registration-Technical Integration&Upgrade 21689 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 1,199.25 Misc.Construction Services 21590 Jay's Catering 2.712.84 Catering Services 21591 Jobs Available, Inc. 515.20 Notices&Ads 21592 Johnstone Supply 20.50 Electrical Supplies 21593 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 2.082.33 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 21594 Kelly Paper 78.34 Paper 21595 Industrial Distribution Group 683.07 Tools 21596 Lab Support 8,138.47 Temporary Employment Services 21597 Labware, Inc. 1.500.00 Registration 21598 LaserAll Corp. 50.00 Primer Service Agreement 21599 Lee Valley Tools 877.85 Tools 21600 L.euis-Nexis 474.03 Books&Publications 21601 Linkage, Inc. 5,680.00 Training Registration 21602 Long Beach Line-X 1,059.59 Truck Supplies 21603 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 300.00 Architectural Services Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16/99 to 8131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21604 Los Angeles Times 603AO Notices&Ads 21605 Luca's 95.00 Meeting Expense 21606 Maintenance Technology Corp. 350.66 Welding Supplies 21607 McGarry Central 1,209.00 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement 21608 Medlin Controls Co. 563.80 Instrument Supplies 21609 Mission Uniform Service 3,585.07 Uniform Rentals 21610 Mitchell Instrument Co. 3,061.00 Instruments 21611 Moreland&Associates 1,180.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 21612 Motion Industnes 292.36 Pump Supplies 21613 MotoPhoto 236.15 Photographic Services 21614 National Plant Services, Inc. 17,036.00 Vacuum Truck Services 21615 Network Installation Corporation 1.830.40 Office Equipment Earthquake Reinforcement 21618 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 804.02 LubncanUDiesel Fuel 21617 Ninyo&Moore 1,661.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 21616 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 21619 NAB Associates, Inc. 1.447.00 Lab Services 21620 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.062.50 Office Supplies 21621 OhmarUVEGA Corp. 3,865.46 Instrument Maint. Service 21622 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 12.29 Plumbing Supplies 21623 Orange County Sanitation District 9,359.09 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 21624 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 33825 Electrical Supplies 21625 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 21826 Oxygen Service Company 1.328.64 Specialty Gases 21627 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 210.11 Electrical Supplies 21628 Pacific Bell 47.84 Telephone Services 21629 Pacific Mechanical Supply 287.99 Plumbing Supplies 21830 Pagenst 1,652.84 Rental Equipment 21631 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,844.00 Filters 21632 Petco Animal Supplies,Inc. 32.28 Lab Supplies 21633 Polydyne, Inc. 22,138.77 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 21634 Port Supply 163.78 Rope 21635 Power Lift Corporation 1,100.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training 21636 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental 21637 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin. 21638 Quad Knopf,Inc. 2,131.30 Professional Services-Tule Ranch Site Study 21639 Quality Building Supply 264.40 Landscaping Supplies 21640 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 21641 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 21642 Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. 334.98 Lab Supplies 21643 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,084.94 Life Insurance Premium 21644 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 195.00 Registration Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16199 to 8131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21645 RPM Electric Motors 5,818.65 Electric Motor Repair 21646 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 684.99 Paint Supplies 21647 Saratoga Institute 927.93 Publication 21648 Schneider Electric 5.296.60 Software Maint.Agreement 21649 Schwing America, Inc. 333.88 Pump Supplies 21650 Scientific Refrigeration 2,244.65 Refrigerator Repair 21651 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 180.37 Specialty Gases 21652 City of Seal Beach 126.68 Water Use 21653 Sears Industrial Sales 530.14 Mechanical Supplies 21654 Second-Sun 411.99 Light Fixtures 21655 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 214.51 Tools 21656 Shepherd Machinery Co. 157.36 Truck Supplies 21657 Sheraton Harbor 713.02 Registration 21658 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 3.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 21659 Sierra Automated Valve Services, Inc. 959.01 Plumbing Supplies 21660 SkillPath Seminars 198.00 Training Registration 21661 Voided Check - - 21662 Snap-On Incorporated 92.94 Tools 21663 So.Cal.Gas Company 14.474.94 Natural Gas 21664 SoftView Computer Products 126.57 Computer Supplies 21665 SoftChoice 282.31 Software 21666 South Coast Water 50.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 21667 Starbuck Truck Refinishing,Inc. 1,060.50 Painting Service 21668 Voided Check - - 21669 Sun-Belt Landscape 6 Maintenance 6,945.00 Landscape Maint. 21670 Sunset Industrial Parts 623.02 Mechanical Supplies 21671 Technomic Publishing Company,Inc. 64.13 Publication 21672 The Register 108.00 Notices 8 Ads 21673 Thermo LabSystems,Inc. 6,550.00 Lab Equipment Maint. 21674 Thomas M.Dawes 4,760.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 21675 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 473.21 Mechanical Supplies 21678 Tomell 8 Cotten 250.00 Legal Services-Cartel 21677 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 520.00 Seminar Registration 21678 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 180.00 Lab Services 21679 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,886.20 Lab Supplies 21680 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Fitters 21681 Ultra Scientific 232.46 Lab Supplies 21682 Underground Service Alert of So. Calif. 25.00 Membership 21683 United Parcel Service 120.08 Parcel Services 21684 Unocal 76 30.90 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 21685 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 2.308.02 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16/99 to 8/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21686 Valley Cities Supply Company 76.14 Plumbing Supplies 21687 Verve's Plumbing 5,860.00 Plumbing Supplies 21688 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 14,716.08 Vision Service Premium 21689 VCI Mechanical 600.00 Electrical Service 21690 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,529.30 Lab Supplies 21691 The Wackenhut Corporation 11,928.05 Security Guards 21692 Waters Corporation 4,269.75 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment 21693 Waxie Sanitary Supply 1,389.26 Janitorial Supplies 21694 WeBec'99 e40.00 Registration 21695 Wells Supply Company 173.48 Plumbing Supplies 21696 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 10.074.02 Instrument Supplies 21697 Xerox Corporation 5,535.87 Copier Leases 21698 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 213.24 Office Supplies 21699 Yokogawa Corp.of America 285.38 Instrument Supplies 21700 3CMA 480.00 Registration 21701 Nicholas J.Arhontes 307.44 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 21702 Robert M.Bell 120.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 21703 Pongsakdi Cady 120.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21704 Jerry F.Evangelista 370.40 Meeting/Training Expense Relmb. 21705 Chuck Hodge 1,144.92 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21706 Andrei loan 602.53 Meeting/Training Expense Relmb. 21707 Kathleen T. Millea 560.00 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb. 21708 Sharon Nelius 1,145.05 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 21709 So Coast Air Quality Management District 327.80 Registration-Rideshare Program 21710 Henry Lorimer&Fry's Electronics 2,909.24 Employee Computer Loan Program 21711 Jim Elo&Micro Center 2,207.51 Employee Computer Loan Program 21712 League Of California Cities 25.00 Registration 21713 Orange County Sanitation District 932.18 Petty Cash Reimb. 21714 Bernard Construction Company, Inc. 105,982.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R 21715 Voided Check - - 21716 Cooper Energy Services 26,903.50 Engine Supplies 21717 Delta Dental 41,949.91 Dental Insurance Plan 21718 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 425,269.19 Construction 3-38-1 &7-17 21719 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 63,828.28 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 21720 James Martin&Co. 171,658.16 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO 5/27/98 21721 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 93,281.19 Fame Chloride MO 9-27-95 21722 Mike Prlich&Sons 111,835.00 Construction 6-12 21723 Palnewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 21724 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 35,252.29 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21725 Reilastar 26,088.64 Employee Medical Health Premium 21726 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 260,055.00 Construction 2-34R Page a of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16199 to 8131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21727 Southern California Edison 41,696.37 Power 21728 SCAP 31,226.59 BRSC Assessment Fee&Kem County Expert Witness Expense 21729 Voided Check - - 21730 The Trans Company 25,873.58 Electrical Supplies 21731 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 41,979.62 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21732 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 137,290.65 Construction 3-38-1 21733 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 40,256.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 21734 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 54.336.81 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 21735 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 46,875.41 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 21738 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 77,674.40 Legal Services MO 7-28-95 21737 Reliastar 11,754.92 Employee Medical Health Premium 21738 Boyle Engineering Corporation 25,304.82 Engineering Services 3-38-1 &7-27 21739 Brown&Caldwell 260,761.40 Engineering Services J-35-1 &Pl-37 21740 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 48,842.25 Professional Services J40-4 21741 Orange County Sanitation District 409.218.28 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 21742 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 178,828.82 Engineering Services J42 21743 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 67,267.22 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 21744 Abeam 621.36 Hardware 21746 Airgas Dry Ice 3.10 Lab Supplies 21746 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group, Inc. 8,500.00 Training Registration 21747 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 653.54 Valve Supplies 21748 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 21749 BNI Building News 720.00 Registration 21750 Carollo Engineers 7,650.19 Engineering Services P1-36-2 21751 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 21752 Consolidated Elect.Distributors.Inc. 1,852.88 Electrical Supplies 21753 Consulting Psychologists Press 377.19 Training Supplies 21754 Diane Kilpatrick 611.07 Wage Garnishment 21755 DGA Consultants, Inc. 24,495.08 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 21758 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 900.00 Training Registration 21757 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 21758 Gartner Group,Inc. 23,400.00 Research Advisory Service 21759 Government Finance Officers Association 450.00 Financial Reporting Review Fee 21760 Harbour Engineering Group 11,700.00 Pump Supplies 21761 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 4.595.55 Engineering Services P144 21762 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 346.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 21763 Infotec Santa Ana 900.00 Registration 21764 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,688.58 Dues Deduction 21765 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 51.64 Safety Supplies 21766 ISATECH/1999 175.00 Registration 21767 Laraine Pipoly and the Law Offices of Mark Plummer 12.000.00 Claim Settlement Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 8/16199 to 8131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21768 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. $9.03 Engineering Services 2-37 21769 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.429.01 Tools 21770 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2,390.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 21771 Oceans'99 100.00 Registration 21772 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 21773 Orange County Forum 30.00 Registration 21774 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 21775 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 3.521.69 Electrical Supplies 21776 OCS Reprographics 35.56 Printing Service-Spec P-173 21777 OCEA 612.26 Dues Deduction 21778 Pacific Bell 79.28 Telephone Services 21779 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 21780 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 21781 Peace Officers Council of CA $10.00 Dues Deduction 21782 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4.796.60 Tools/Hardware 21783 Snap-On Incorporated 13.36 Tools 21784 So.Cal.Gas Company 6.44 Natural Gas 21785 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 12,956.95 Emission Fees-Plant 1 21788 State of California 134.06 Wage Garnishment 21787 Textile Engineering Associates 510.18 Belt Press Supplies 21788 Foxboro Company 19.76 Instrument Supplies 21789 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,346.40 Mechanical Supplies 21790 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 40.00 Seminar Registration 21791 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 21792 Blake Anderson 283.79 Mesting/Training Expense Reimb. 21793 City of Huntington Beach 100.00 Permit Fee-Job No.J-33-1 21794 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 18,867.17 Emission Fees-Plant 2 21795 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 137,290.65 Construction 3-38-1 21796 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 17,900.00 Professional Services- Contingency Plans 8 Procedure Project Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,733,385.29 Payroll Disbursements 15371 -15504 Employee Paychecks $ 183,988.48 Biweekly Payroll 8/25199 15505.15506 Employee Paychecks 16,278.58 Adjustment&Termination 40634.41271 Direct Deposit Statements 657,938.87 Biweekly Payroll 8125/99 15507-16527 Directors'Paychecks 5,305.62 Payroll 8127199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 863,511.55 Total Claims Paid 8116199-8131199 $ 4,596,896.84 Page 8 of 8 DRAFT MINUTES OF SPECIAL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, August 19, 1999 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, August 19, 1999 at 3:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Pal McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee North Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: (via teleconferencing) Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Peer Swan, Vice Chair Jim Silva, County Supervisor (2) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 4:02 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss two issues as follows: 1. Confer with General Counsel re Orange County Bankruptcy litigation—County of Orange v. Merrill Lynch, at al. (Government Code Section 54956.9). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS) litigation v. County of Orange, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 791315 (Government Code Section 54956.9) Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time that the approved action becomes final re Action Item No. 2(1). No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 2(2). At 4:50 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (3) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m. Submitted byr-, I 44*Tappan "ring Committee Secretary .. v 1 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES COMBINED MEETING Wednesday, August 25, 1999 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, August 25, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Tom Nixon, Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart Peer Swan, Vice Chair Mike Moore, OCSD Employee Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Layne Baroldi, OCSO Employee Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Jeff Bauer, Paine Webber John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Don Hughes, Director Silva's Office Jim Silva, County Supervisor Ryal Wheeler, OCSD Employee Kris Lindstrom, Environmental Consultant Directors Absent: Joseph Grindstraff, SAWPA Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Don McIntyre, General Manager Directors Present: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources John Collins, Committee Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Peer Swan, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Jim Herberg, Planning Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Peter Green, Director (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the July 21, 1999 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were approved as drafted. Director Swan abstained. V Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 2 August 25, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Jan Debay congratulated Director Swan on his election to the MWD Board, which is effective September 13, 1999. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. Update on Huntington State Beach Closure. General Manager Don McIntyre reported that the publicity about the beach closure and our efforts has been accurate because of Director of Communication Michelle Tuchman's efforts. So far the articles have been better than expected. Mr. McIntyre announced that television coverage is expected at tonight's Board meeting. About $350,000 has been expended to dale on the investigation. Staff will be requesting emergency funding from the Board for modifications to the Coast Trunk sewer-line siphon. Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli described the background of the beach closure and ongoing and planned activities in the effort to identify the source. The beach is now closed from the Santa Ana River to Golden West Street. Representatives from the City of Huntington Beach staff, Stale Parks, Orange County Health Care Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board and OCSD staff are meeting daily. A list of action items has been developed. The City of Huntington Beach is taking a more active role and looking more closely at their facilities. A new State law that went into effect on July 1 establishes lower limits for various contaminates along the coast. This may result in more frequent and longer closures than would have been imposed prior to July 1. B. SAWPA and the State Water Bond Issue. Joseph Grindstaff, Executive Director of the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency (SAWPA) made a presentation on the SAWPA Plan and how it relates to the State Water Bond Issue and what changes are being considered for the Agency. The Santa Ana River watershed is the largest watershed and the largest water supply in southern California. Therefore, impacts on the watershed affect everyone in the basin. The goal of the SAWPA Plan is to have three year supply of water stored in the basin. Mr. Grindstaff described the projects necessary to reach that goal. Chair Debay mentioned as a 'heads up'that the resolution of support for the GWR System Project was presented at the last Newport Beach City Council meeting and there were several dissenters who tied it to growth enhancement. Another issue is how SAWPA should manage the broader responsibilities of the agency. One suggestion has been having a Board representative from the County's Board of Supervisors of each of the three counties in the Santa Ana basin. Copies of the overviews were requested by Chair Debay. 7 Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 3 August 25, 1999 (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Financial Consolidation of Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and for a Single User Fee Rate Structure. This item was moved to the September Steering Committee meeting. B. City of Brea Request for Contribution for Sewer Line Construction to Serve Bexley Neighborhood Annexation. Gary Streed discussed the letter request from the City of Brea. The County and City will be putting in funds and the homeowners will form an assessment district. The request is for the Sanitation District to providing additional funding and to waive connection fees because these homeowners have been paying user fees through their property taxes. This would decrease the homeowners' costs from $600 to $300 per year. Staff was asked to prepare a report outlining the options available before a policy decision is made. There are other areas in the County that are in this same situation and in the past the District has not helped to fund those connections, either through discounted or waived connection fees. There is some concern that this could be construed as gifts of public funds. This will be presented to the Steering Committee before forwarding to the FAHR Committee. Director Silva will check with County staff to find out how the County will be funding this program with the City of Brea. C. The list of agenda items scheduled to be reviewed by the Working Committees in September were reviewed. (9) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair John Collins did not make a report. (10) COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES DISCUSSION ITEM A. The Public Comment Period for the Draft EIR on the Strategic Plan ended on August 16. There were 23 responses. A synopsis of the comments was prepared by staff and presented to the Committee members. The Southeast Huntington Beach Homeowners Assn. has requested that the comment period be extended so that they could address the issues impacting their neighborhood in more detail, specifically odor control and noise. Staff prepared a response sheet to the homeowners that addresses their concerns, and the Ad Hoc Committee members agreed that an extension was not necessary. A decision will be forthcoming on whether to hold a special meeting to review the final document. The Directors will be notified as soon as the decision is made. Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 4 August 25, 1999 (11) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications or supplemental agenda items. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 5 p.m. This will be a combined meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee to review the draft Final EIR that is scheduled to be considered at the October 27, 1999 regular Board Meeting. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:15 p.m. in Closed Session to discuss three items, as follows: 1) General Manager's Performance Evaluation for 1996-1999, (Govemment Code Section 54957); 2) Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Ltd. Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C); and 3) Consider initiating litigation concerning regulation of biosolids (Government Code Section 54956.9(c). Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of a future Board Meeting will report on the actions when they are approved. At 6:57 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. ubmitied by: Tappan t ering Committee Secretary rnwr.er.�.wmunrEmw cavwmeeocawwawm scw+ra.ro,.ma Y v Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING AUGUST 25, 1999 OJ�t ANITgl�O 'Lls O c 9 O y �WV'V H ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 q'. Minutes for Board Meeting 9 08/25/99 v Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on August 25, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill A James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater A Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts A Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman;Wendy Sevenandt; Layne Baroldi; Paula Zeller, Brian Singman; Jim Hams; Jim Herberg; John Linder, Ryal Wheeler, Sam Mowbray; Mike Moore; Charlie McGee OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Tom Nixon; Alternate Director Dave Garofalo; Congressman Dana Rohrbacher, Paul Healy; Ray Silver, Don Hughes; Kris Lindstrom; Don Schulz; Irwin Haydock; p Minutes for Board Meeting t 08/25/99 y Page 3 REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair advised Directors that the committees would resume meeting in September. Chair Debay then reported on the CASA Conference that was held in August, and encouraged Directors to attend these conferences. The next conference will be held in Palm Springs in January. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager recognized Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, who spoke to the Directors on the Huntington Beach closure. Mr. Ghirelli reviewed the various measures and processes the District had undergone to try to identify where the bacteria was coming from, and all testing was negative. The District tested all restroom sewer laterals, found one line break and fixed it. The bacteria levels were spreading and as of August 25", the Healthcare Agency dosed more of Huntington Beach, from the Huntington Beach pier to Golden West Avenue. When the reports came back negative, staff decided to then further ocean samples along the outfall and back towards the power plant in a triangular shape. All samples came back clear and @ has been determined the outfall is not the source of contamination. Staff is continuing to monitor the surf zone as well as offshore monitoring. For the last two weeks a contractor and staff have been cleaning out the siphon in the Coast Trunk Sewer so that the siphon can be monitored by closed circuit TV. Initial inspection indicates that the siphon has no visual cracks or holes and no water is seeping in. Mr. Ghirelli then outlined the next steps the District would be undertaking to resolve the problem: infrared Flyover and visual inspection; possible dye study; additional sampling and hydropunching along side of the outfall pipe; sample testing of Talbert Marsh; and further inspection of the construction site on Pacific Coast Highway in Huntington Beach. Directors entered into a discussion and asked questions of staff. Mr. Ghirelli stated that effective July 26, 1999 new health standards came into effect due to AB 411. Congressman Dana Rohrbacher was then recognized who offered his support and assistance in obtaining state and federal assistance and coordination. General Manager Don McIntyre staled that assistance would be needed in the future in diverting dry weather storm drain Flows to the District's treatment plant Staff requested that an emergency item be added to the agenda requesting authority for $300,000 to modify the siphon on the Coast Trunk Sewer and insert a slip line inside the siphon. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Finding that the following matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and there is a need to take immediate action thus requiring it to be added to the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), to wit: award of a contract to modify the Coast Trunk Sewer, and, Minutes for Board Meeting 08/25/99 v Page 4 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board finds and resolves that there presently exists a great public health hazard in the surf zone of the ocean in that high levels of bacteria, indicative of human waste and other sewage, have been discovered and the District's adjacent Coast Trunk Sewer needs modification to insure against any spill or discharge from the sewer system; and that the public interest and necessity require immediate expenditure of public monies to safeguard life, health and property; and that a contract be awarded for construction of said modifications without notice and soliciting sealed bids, as authorized pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20783. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the General Manager be authorized to issue an emergency purchase order for a construction contract to include staff time and contingency in an amount not to exceed$300,000 for Coast Trunk Siphon Modification Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-4. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported that with respect to the Montrose matter of litigation, on August 19, 1999, the United States District Court approved and entered as a Judgement, the Amended Consent Decree. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 21, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 07/15/99 07/31/99 Totals $4,779.505.54 $18.805,393.44 Director Leyes abstained. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the August 25, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 21, 1999 to be filed. 12. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. Minutes for Board Meeting 08/25/99 Page 5 The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on July 26 and August 12, 1999 to be filed. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1999. 14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Amendment No. 5 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of District's Residual Solids with Pima Gm Systems, Inc., extending the contract term from 04/01/00 to 06/30/00 with two additional one-year extensions and increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from $21.92 to$25.90 for fair weather management, and $33.70 for inclement weather management for an annual amount not to exceed$1,993,000; and, (2) Approve Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of District's Residual Solids with the Bio Gro division of Wheelabrator Water Technologies, Inc., extending the contract term from 04/26/00 to 06/30/02 and increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from$21.45 to$25.45 for fair weather management and from $29.00 to $36.00 for inclement weather management, for an annual amount not to exceed $1,775,000; and, (3)Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Management of Biosolids with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms, extending the contract term from 12/02/01 to 06/30/04 and increasing the costs per ton of biosolids managed from $22.40 to $25.00, for fair weather management and $28.00 for inclement weather management for an annual amount not to exceed $1,371,000. 15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L, M. N, and 0 at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-39, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, for a total amount not to exceed $9,647,600. 16. Ordinance No. OCSD-10, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Perittee Charges for Use: A brief report was given by General Counsel regarding the proposed ordinance. OPEN HEARING: The Chair declared the hearing opened at 8:29 p.m. No correspondence was received and no objections in other fors were received on this Ordinance. No persons requested to speak to the Board on this issue. CLOSE HEARING: The Chair declared the hearing closed at 8:30 p.m. Minutes for Board Meeting 08/25/99 Page 6 MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD- 10, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Pennittee Charges for Use, by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-10, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Pennittee Charges for Use. 17. General Counsel reported a need for a dosed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos. 17(a)(1), (2), (3), (4). (5) and (6). General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), upon a two- thirds' vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE: That evaluation of the General Manager's performance be added to the agenda as Item No. 17(a)(7). CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in dosed session at 8:31 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the ClosedSession held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with Califomia Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1), (2). (3), (4), and (5). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 17(a)(6), and no report was given. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:30 p.m.,the Board reconvened in regular session. 17(a) 7. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-15, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Relating to Compensation of the General Manager. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. r /9 Secretary of the'�oard of D' tors of Orange Coun amtation District H1wpAtMapendalBortd Minotea11999 Board Minutm=2599400 Claims Paid From 711y99 to 711SMS Warrant No. Vendor Amount Deacription Accounts Payable-Warrants 20564 Carollo Engineers E 151,919.24 Engineering Services-P11-36.2,P2.60,J-25.4 8 J-34-1 20565 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 37,200.00 Lab Supplies 20566 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 39.476.69 11 Notebook Computers, 1 HP Printer 814 RAM Kits 20567 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 35.508.00 Painting Maint.Services MO4-22-98 20568 Glerlich-Mitchell,Inc. 39,895.67 Belt, Filler Press Supplies 20569 James Martin 8 Co. 99,650.00 Professional Services-Data Integration Project MO W7/98 20570 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 34,956.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 20671 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 42,791.90 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 20572 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 52,403.77 Engineering Services 2-37 20573 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 31.177.98 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 20574 Polydyne,Inc. 37,135.40 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 20575 Reliastar 25,059.61 Employee Medical Health Premium 20576 Rockwell Engineering 8 Equipment Co. 28,126.25 Pump Supplies 20577 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 74.460.76 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 20578 United HeallhCare 127,735.41 Medical Health Insurance 20571 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 32.148.39 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 20580 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 30,980.71 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 20581 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 731,384.93 Construction 7-17 rr 20582 KPRS Consimctlon Services,Inc. 148,145.40 Construction P2-65 q 20583 Southern Contracting Company 40,265.00 Construction P2-47-1 20584 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 2,326.14 Long Distance Telephone Services 20585 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 116.53 Long Distance Telephone Services 20586 Adamson Industries 1.753.31 Lab Supplies 20687 Advanced Sealing 8 Supply Co., Inc. 1,687.49 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 20588 Aldco Systems,Inc. 14,611.80 Electrical Supplies 20589 Air Cold Supply 634.82 Air Conditioner Repairs 20590 Air Products 8 Chemicals 22,894.98 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 20591 Airborne Express 118.25 Air Freight 20592 American Airlines 2.767.00 Travel Services 20593 American Society for Training 8 Dev. 61.90 Registration 20594 American Training Resources,Inc. 425.81 Training Matedals 20595 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 20596 Applied Industrial Technology 214.75 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 20597 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 540.00 Vawum Truck Services 20598 Arl s Disposal Service,Inc. 968.46 Waste Removal 20599 Asbury Environmental Services 245.00 Waste Oil Removal 20600 Atlantis Pool Care 612.56 Service Agreement 20601 Audio Video Supply,Inc. 58.37 Video Supplies 20602 Aurora Data Systems 4,449.95 MSDS Scanning 8lndexing Services Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 711199 to 7/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20603 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 346.08 Filters 20604 Awards&Trophies By Bea 554.37 Plaques 20605 ACT Group, Inc. 400.00 Service Agreement-Office Equipment 20606 AMA 3,900.00 Registration 20607 American Industrial 628.04 Chemicals-Pest Control 20608 APEX Communications 951.28 Communication Equipment Upgrade 20609 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Services 20610 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 430.55 Telephone Services 20611 AT&T Wireless Service 3,538.03 Cellular Telephone Service 20612 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 1,897.14 Cellular Telephone Services 20613 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 20614 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 672.20 Electrical Supplies 20615 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 1,457.04 Telephone Installation 20616 Bentley Systems, Inc. 5,252.81 Software Maint. 20617 BioVir Laboratories 1,313.29 Lab Supplies 20618 Boznanski&Co., Inc. 1,600.00 Appraisal Services-Porter Plating 20619 Bristol Systems,Inc. 19,902.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 20620 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,163.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 20621 Cal-Glass, Inc. 81.89 Lab Equipment Service N 20622 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,245.00 Pump Supplies y 20623 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc. 393.56 Service Agreement ry 20624 Caltrol,Inc. 1,299.25 Valves 20625 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 2,266.00 Engineering Services Pi-62 20626 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 614.70 Office Furniture 20627 Charles P. Crowley Co. 365.58 Instrument Parts 20628 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 527.97 Office Supplies 20629 Sun International 405.95 Lab Supplies 20630 Connell GM Parts 34.52 Truck Supplies 20631 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3,370.42 Electrical Supplies 20632 Consolidated Plastics Company 193.78 Lab Supplies 20633 Contractors Equipment Co. 203.38 Equipment Repair 20634 Converse Consultants 10,778.60 Consulting Services P2-65 20635 Corporate Express 579.92 Office Supplies 20636 Cotelligem 8,610.00 Professional Services-Computer 20637 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 4,312.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20638 County of Orange 518.94 Communication Service Agreement 20639 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,209.10 Electrical Supplies 20640 CAPIO:Calif Assoc of Public Info OBds 60.00 Membership 20641 CH2MHill 2,399.40 Engineering Services-Microfiltrafion Project 20642 CH2MHill 8,503.77 Engineering Services-J-31 Page 2 of 8 m Claims Paid From 711199 to 7115M Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20643 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 483.50 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer 20644 CPI-The ARemative Supplier,Inc. 1,361.53 Lab Supplies 20645 CR&R,Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 20646 CWEA-TCP 30.00 Membership 20647 Dapper Tire Co. 1,779.71 Truck Time - 20648 David's Tres Service 1,950.00 Tree Removal 20649 Del Mar Analytical 1,004.00 Biosolids Analysis 20660 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 1,775.57 Valves 20651 Diamond H Recognition 2,642.08 Employee Service Awards 20652 Dickson's. Inc. 797.35 Electrical Supplies _ 20653 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 871.15 Paint Supplies 20654 DGA Consultants,Inc. 16,605.87 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 20655 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,333.00 Medical Screening 20656 Electra-Bond 4,773.33 Mechanical Supplies-Belt Filter Press Rollers 20657 Employers Group 230.00 Registration Fees 20658 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 20659 Environmental Sampling Supply 240.62 Lab Supplies 20680 Fairbanks Swiss, Inc. 3,934.36 Maim.Service Agreement 20661 FedEx Corporation 180.91 Air Freight n 20662 Fibertron 1,422.00 Fiber Optic Cable 20663 Finnigan MAT Western Region 218.83 Freight W 20664 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 2,070.70 Lab Supplies 20665 Forma Systems, Inc. 3.008.00 Professional Services-Geographical Infonnation System Project 20668 Fountain Valley Camera 82.53 Photo Supplies 20667 FLW Service Corp.South 167.33 Instrument Supplies 20068 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 309.13 Road Base Materials 20869 Ganahl Lumber Company 798.85 Lumber/Hardware 20670 GTE California 2,353.96 Telephone Services 20671 George Yardley Co. 1.929.67 Lab Supplies 20872 Glenarm Companies, Inc. 294.00 Publication 20673 Governmental Accounting Side Board 95.00 Subscription 20874 WAN Grainger,Inc. 195.65 Compressor Supplies 20675 Graseby STI 2.882.01 Engine Supplies 20676 Graybar Electric Company 650.81 Electrical Supplies 20677 Great American Printing Co. 579.26 Printing Service 20678 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 289.33 Janitorial Supplies 20679 Haaker Equipment Company 601.61 Truck Supplies 20680 Hamilton Company 49.83 Lab Supplies 20681 Harold Primrose Ica 96.00 Ica 20882 Harting&Associates 2,790.00 Professional Services-Process Control Software Standards Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 711199 to 7115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20683 Herb's Blacklorest Bakery& Deli 292.48 Catering Services 20684 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 248.25 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 20685 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 421.81 Compressor Parts 20686 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 20,352.88 Mainl.Services-Sewer Cleaning 20687 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 11.810.50 Engineering Services 2-40 20688 Home Depot 556.45 Small Hardware 20689 City of Huntington Beach 11,886.80 Water Use 20690 Idexx 5,238.09 Lab Supplies 20691 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,567.64 Office Supplies 20692 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental 20693 Integra Biosciences, Inc. 69.44 Lab Supplies 20694 Integration Technologies 1,590.00 Training Registration 20695 Intergraph Corporation 862.00 Software 20696 Interstate Battery Systems 286.35 Batteries 20697 Irvine Photo Graphics 5.58 Photographic Services 20698 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 20699 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 20700 ISI lnfonext 2.070.00 Service Agreement-Communication Equipment 20701 J.G.Tucker and Son. Inc. 2,681.95 Instrument Supplies rt 20702 James Engineering, Inc. 3,397.00 Consulting Services-Benchmarking Project y 20703 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services a 20704 Jay's Catering 510.09 Catering Services 20705 Johnstone Supply 381.37 Electrical Supplies 20706 Kalmar Promotions 1,458.60 Printing 20707 Industrial Distribution Group 2,365.40 Tools 20708 Labware, Inc. 4.600.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 20709 Lexis-Nexis 501.86 Books&Publications 20710 Maintenance Technology Corp. 74.03 Welding Supplies 20711 Mar Vac Electronics 11.53 Instrument Supplies 20712 Masune Company 136.65 Safety Supplies 20713 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 2.003.38 Plumbing Supplies 20714 McBain Instruments 560.00 Lab Supplies 20715 McGraw-Hill,Inc. 635.61 Publication 20716 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 216.66 Tools 20717 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 1,298.76 Auto Parts&Supplies 20718 Mec Analytical System 650.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 20719 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 18,363.78 Software Maint.Agreement 20720 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5,617.53 Mechanical Repairs 20721 Mission Uniform Service 2.132.29 Uniform Rentals 20722 Morgan Company 455.00 Truck Repair Page 4 of 8 c Claims Paid From 711199 to 7115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20723 M.J.SchM&Associates, Inc. 1,928.00 Professional Services-Corrosion 20724 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 20725 National Plant Services, Inc. 1,170.00 Vacuum Truck Services 20726 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 15.910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 20727 Newark Electronics 263A3 Instrument Supplies 20728 City of Newport Beach 145.35 Water Use 20729 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 20,635.58 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 20730 Northwestern Carbon 3,095.00 Filters 20731 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.461.75 Office Supplies 20732 Oracle Corporation 15,150.00 Training Registration 20733 Oracle Corporation-Support/Sales 5,107.35 Software 20734 Oracle Store 99.99 Publication 20735 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 91.61 Plumbing Supplies 20736 Orange County Forum 30.00 Registration 20737 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 155.66 Electrical Supplies 20738 Oxygen Service Company 1,524.01 Specialty Gases �J 20739 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 1,422.30 Electrical Supplies $ 20740 Pacific Bell 123.38 Telephone Services �* 20741 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service n 20742 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5.145.62 Plumbing Supplies q 20743 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 17,724.68 Software u+ 20744 Parts Unlimited 503.26 Truck Supplies 20745 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 5.523.23 Lab Supplies 20748 Petce Animal Supplies, Inc. 202.91 Lab Supplies 20747 Phipps&Bird 4,231.02 Electrical Supplies 20748 Pinkerton Systems Integration 22,898.19 Security Card Reader System 20749 Primary Source 204.90 Office Furniture 20750 Pump Engineering 2,197.04 Pump Supplies 20751 Pulzmeister 298.19 Pump Supplies 20752 Duantema Environmental Services 950.00 Analytical Service 20753 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 20764 Ralnin Instrument Co.,Inc. 2,595.90 Lab Supplies 20755 Refrigeration Supplies Distributor 67.03 Electrical Supplies 20756 Risk Sciences 2.000.00 Professional Services-Basin Plan Amendment 20757 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 313.68 Paint Supplies 20758 Schanels Waste Water Products, Inc. 1.100.00 Chemical-Tank Cleaning 20769 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 334.15 Lab Repairs 20760 Secend-Sun 194.09 Light Fixtures 20761 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1.049.04 Tools 20762 Shopping.Com 622.31 Communication Equipment Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 711199 to 7115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20763 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,121.40 Tools/Hardware 20764 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 20765 Supelco,Inc. 1,537.12 Lab Supplies 20766 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 1,163.65 Plumbing Supplies 20767 Solti Computer Products 238.16 Computer Supplies 20768 SoftChoice 5,162.00 Software 20769 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 7,996.90 Emission Fees 20770 Southern California Water 66.88 Water Use 20771 Spex Cedprep,Inc. 121.63 Lab Supplies 20772 Standard and Poore Corp. 1,000.00 COP Contract Service 20773 Summit Steel 53.37 Metal 20774 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 6,463.00 Landscape Maint. 20775 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 20776 SCAP 10,200.00 Consulting Service-Joint Accidental Release Prevention Program 20777 Ten Hoeve Bros.,Inc. 967.38 Instrument Supplies 20778 The Texacon Company 149.76 Mechanical Supplies 20779 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. 7,500.00 Pipeline License Fees 20780 The Mentwood Corporation 4,034.99 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 20781 The Ralph Hernandez Company 20,964.00 Construction-Concrete Installation rr 20782 The Register 2.068.20 Notices&Ads y 20783 Think Earth Environmental Education 7,000.00 Membership a 20754 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,246.91 Mechanical Supplies 20786 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 20786 Tony's Look&Safe Service&Sales 70.23 Locks&Keys 20787 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 11.730.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 20788 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 321.84 Truck Supplies 20789 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 440.00 Lab Services 20790 Teksystems 2,887.50 Temporary Employment Services 20791 The Unisource Corporation 6,633.70 Office Supplies 20792 United Parcel Service 11.00 Parcel Services 20793 Valley Cities Supply Company 919.93 Plumbing Supplies 20794 The Vantage Group, LL.C. 9,272.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 20795 Veme's Plumbing 8.200.00 Plumbing Supplies 20796 Village Nurseries 34.81 Landscaping Supplies 20797 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,448.88 Vision Service Premium 20798 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 7.213.14 Lab Supplies 20799 The Wackenhut Corporation 6.083.04 Security Guards 20800 Ward/Davis Communication 1,680.00 Registration 20801 Waters Corporation 1,761.69 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment 20802 Weed Instruments, Inc. 675.00 Software Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 7/1/99 to 7/15/99 a . Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20803 Wells Supply Company 7,794.59 Plumbing Supplies 20804 Western States Chemical, Inc. 20,583.18 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 20805 Wiztec Inc. 312.48 Computer Supplies 20806 Water Environment Federation 179.00 Software 20807 Xerox Corporation 8,803.64 Copier Leases 20808 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit 20B09 First Fire Systems, Inc. 23,026.81 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 20810 Denise A.Bell 596.11 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 20811 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 248.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 20812 William J.Lloyd 976.85 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 20813 County of Orange 330.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 20814 Ernest Yeboah 8 Advanced Computer 8 Tech. 1,206.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 20815 Orange County Sanitation District 1,432.10 Petty Cash Reimb. 20816 Philip F.Cordova 250.00 Meeting/Training Expense 20817 Employee Activity Committee 4.900.00 Employee Activity Budgeted Expense 20818 Voided Check - - 20819 Ron DeWitt and Compuxpress 1,746.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 20820 Delta Dental 37.259.20 Dental Insurance Plan �,. 20821 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 64,650.00 Computer Based Training Software r' 20822 Orange County Sanitation District 461,353.38 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 20823 Southern California Edison 30,836.08 Power 20824 State Board Of Equalization 33,014.00 Sales Tax Return 20825 Court Order 540.15 Wage Garnishment 20826 Carlton V.Phillips,Jr. 2.992.24 Legal Services-Porter Plating 20B27 Carlton V. Phillips,Jr. 1,348.51 Legal Services-Porter Plating 20828 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 20829 Court Trustee 1.048.66 Wage Garnishment 20830 CASA 720.00 Conference Registration 20831 CSMFO 00.00 Registration 20832 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 20833 Ecological Society of America 900.00 Printing 20834 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 20835 Glenn Lukos 8 Associates 1,511.15 Engineering Service 2-41 20836 Industrial Steam 692.18 Pump Supplies 20837 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,731.51 Dues Deduction 20838 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 294.20 Tools 20839 MAP(Management Action Program) 2,600.00 Training Registration 20840 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 677.98 Plumbing Supplies 20e41 Orange County Business Council 10,000.00 Membership 20842 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 711/99 to 7/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20843 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 2DB44 OCEA 823.51 Dues Deduction 20845 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 20846 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 20847 Peace Officers Council of CA $19.00 Dues Deduction 20848 DOS, L.L.C. 810.34 Registration 20849 Rosen Electrical 561.71 Electrical Supplies 20850 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 252.92 Tools 20851 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 3.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 20852 Snap-On Incorporated 1,546.94 Tools 2D853 So.Cal.Gas Company 14,361.40 Natural Gas 2DB54 Sough Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 13,773.20 Emission Fees 2DB55 Southern California Edison 7,382.81 Power 20856 Peer A.Swan 2,627.66 Meefing/fraining Expense Reimb. 20857 United Way 307.53 Employee Contributions 20858 WeBec'99 2,600.00 Registration {y 20859 Nicholas J.Amontes 178.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 20860 Donald F.McIntyre 528.74 Meeting/training Expense Reimb. 20861 Robert Oaten 981.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 20862 Orange County Sanitation District 16,260.50 Workers Comp. Reimb. y Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.246.398.20 0a Payroll Disbursements 14705.14881 Employee Paychecks $ 141,556.35 BOP 8 Termination 14882- 15013 Employee Paychecks 167,943.65 Biweekly Payroll 7114199 38627-39519 Direct Deposit Statements 640,641.43 Biweekly Payroll 7114199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 950,141.33 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 151.902.50 July Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase Bank of Texas National Association 232,952.86 July Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits Slate Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 198.110.65 July Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 582,966.01 Total Claims Paid 711/99-7115199 $ 4,779,605.54 Page 8 of 8 e Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 20863 Ashbrook Corporation $ 89,349.53 Belt Press Rollers 20864 RPI/Bio Gro 107,872.46 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 20865 City of Newport Beach 1,667,493.00 Construction Reimbursement Agreement 5-41 20866 Cooper Cameron Corporation 32,810.47 Engine Supplies 20867 County of Orange 35,400.83 Reimbursement Agreement-SARI Line 2D868 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 58.317.54 4 Computer Workstations&27 RAM Upgrades 20869 DGA Consultants, Inc. 57,961.64 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 2DB70 DMG-Maximus 66.870.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit 20871 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 56,519.48 Computer Based Training Software 20872 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 65,569.62 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 20873 National Plant Services, Inc. 45,489.41 Vacuum Truck Services 20874 NETG(National Education Training Group) 27,476.25 Computer Based Training Software 20875 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 275,000.00 Annual Membership 20876 Thermo Quest 82,199.08 Lab Supplies 20877 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 183,289.79 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 20878 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 43,290.65 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 20879 Water Environment Research Foundation 71,760.00 Subscription 20880 Western States Chemical, Inc. 38,145.68 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 20881 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 140,373.13 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 rt '0 20882 Advance Constructors, Inc. 90,613.80 Construction 5-41-1 r 20883 Ark Construction Company 164,232.67 Construction P1-444 N 20884 Brown 8 Caldwell 32,164.53 Engineering Services J-35-1 20885 Mike Pdich&Sons 362,298.00 Construction 6-12 20886 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 171,680.75 Engineering Services J-42 20887 Sancen Engineering, Inc. 71.775.00 Construction 2-34R 20888 Orange County Sanitation District 72,686.31 Worker's Camp.Reimb. 20889 A-Plus Systems 893.76 Notices&Ads 20890 Abeam 478.88 Hardware 20891 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 1,013.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20892 Aearo Company 475.00 Safety Supplies 20893 Air Liquide America Corp. 299.32 Specialty Gasses 20894 Air Products&Chemicals 355.63 Lab Supplies 20895 Airborne Express 54.25 Air Freight 20896 Allen Press, Inc. 101.00 Printing Service 20897 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 20898 Appleone Employment Service 7,014.73 Temporary Employment Services 20899 Applied Industrial Technology 126.07 Electrical Parts&Supplies 20900 Datavault 101.50 Offshe Back-Up Tape Storage 20901 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 494.00 Vacuum Truck Services 20902 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 322.82 Waste Removal Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20903 Awards&Trophies By Bea 235.43 Plaques 20904 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 1.000.00 Professional Services-Flow Monitoring Project 20905 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 39.89 Telephone Services 20906 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 1.529.86 Telephone Installation 20907 Battery Specialties 663.05 Batteries 20908 Beckman Coulter,Inc. 1.171.00 Lab Services 20909 Bolt Tech 93.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20910 Brinderson Corp. 602.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 20911 Bristol Systems, Inc. 10,380.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 20912 Brown&Caldwell 2,428.82 Engineering Services J-35-1 20913 Builders Book, Inc. 7.23 Publication 20914 Bureau Of Business Practice 218.20 Publication 20915 California Tattoo Manufacturing Co., Inc 1,238.07 Printing Service 20916 Cappo, Inc. 190.00 Conference Registration 20917 Carl R.Nelson,P.E. 830.00 Engineering Consultant 20918 Carl Warren&Co. 1,311.89 Insurance Claims Administrator 20919 Carcllo Engineers 3,845.50 Engineering Services-Document Management Project 20920 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 9,084.00 Engineering Services Pl-62 20921 Chem Lab Supplies 504.27 Chemical rt 20922 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 26.86 Office Supplies 20923 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 9,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Program N 20924 Computers America,Inc. 797.02 Computer Supplies 20925 Connell GM Parts 341.81 Truck Supplies 20926 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 289.00 Electrical Supplies 20927 Continental-McLaughlin 481.28 Hardware 20928 Copelce Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 20929 Corporate Express Imaging 181.02 Computer Supplies 20930 Corporate Express 1.491.73 Computer Supplies 20931 Cost Containment Solutions 1,163.28 Worker's Camp.Services 20932 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1,012.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20933 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,399.32 Electrical Supplies 20934 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 20935 Cytec Industries 11,780.25 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 20936 CEM Corporation 499.55 Lab Supplies 20937 CEPA Company 1,140.04 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 20938 CNA Consulting&Engineering 16.139.00 Professional Services-Bar Code Inventory System 20939 CR&R, Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 20940 CA Utilities Emergency Assn., Inc. 538.12 Membership 20941 CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership 20942 Daily Pilot 62.50 Notices&Ads 20943 Del Mar Analytical 3,140.00 Biosolids Analysis Page 2 of 9 0 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20944 DeZudk C/O Misco/SouthWest 22.817.82 Valves 20945 Don Maurer 3.150.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 20946 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 20947 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 160.00 Medical Screening 20948 Enchanter, Inc. 7,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 20949 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 10.986.94 Consulting Services-HIS Imp].&Support 20950 Environmental Express 1,626.12 Lab Supplies 20951 Environmental Resources Associates 1,205.50 Lab Supplies 20952 EMED Graphic Communications 5,567.48 Indentification Tags 20953 FedEx Corporation 445.98 Air Freight 20954 Filter Supply Company 21.11 Filters 20965 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,870.68 Lab Supplies 20956 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,191.04 Pump Supplies 20957 Fluid Dynamics 910.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental 20958 Fountain Valley Camera 50.26 Photo Supplies 20959 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 285.83 Paint Supplies 20960 Franklin Covey 48.49 Office Supplies 20961 Fry's Electronics 1,156.71 Computer Supplies c 20962 Ganahl Lumber Company 112.79 Lumber/Hardware n 20963 GTE California 7,558.10 Telephone Services 20964 George Yardley Co. 781.94 Lab Supplies Ww 20965 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 5.652.98 Belt. Filter Press Supplies 20966 Glass Tech Supplies Inc. 3.175.18 Lab Supplies 20967 Glenn Lukos&Associates 6,735.26 Engineering Service 2-41 20968 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 20969 Graseby STI 1.883.94 Engine Supplies 20970 Great American Printing Co. 62.44 Printing Service 20971 Harbour Engineering Group 5,744.20 Pump Supplies 20972 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 543.54 Truck Supplies 20973 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 59.00 Catering Services 20974 Hewlett-Packard 1,616.37 Lab Supplies 20975 Hilton San Diego Resort 624.62 Registration 20976 Hoemiger Service, Inc. 1,067.96 Compressor Parts 20977 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 24,274.10 Maim.Services-Sewer Cleaning 20978 The Holman Group 1,429.94 Employee Assistance Program Premium 20979 Home Depot 791.68 Small Hardware 20980 Hub Auto Supply 108.39 Truck Parts 20981 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental 20982 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 203.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20983 Intelligence Press,Inc. 945.00 Subscription 20984 International Mascot Corporation 745.00 OC Fair Uniform Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20985 Interstate Battery Systems 219.70 Batteries 20986 Intuitive Technology Corporation 6,270.00 Software Maint.Agreement 20987 Irvine Photo Graphics 16.71 Photographic Services 20988 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.64 Water Use 20989 IBM Corporation 1,630.00 IBM AS/400 Y2K Testing 20990 IBM Corporation 1.520.00 Training Registration 20991 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,810.90 Be"Supplies 20992 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 922.02 Instrument Supplies 20993 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,039.45 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 20994 Jays Catering 1.073.72 Catering Services 20995 Judith Learner 590.10 Training Registration 20996 Joint Instrumentation Committee 90.00 Registration 20997 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 6,875.00 Engineering Services 241 20998 K.P. Undstrom,Ina 9,478.69 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 20999 Katmar Promotions 1,941.66 Printing 21000 Industrial Distribution Group 938.18 Tools 21001 Kodax 150.00 Registration 21002 Komax Systems,Inc. 220.00 Electrical Supplies 21003 Krone, Inc. 818.77 Electrical Supplies 21004 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 62.97 Safety Supplies 21005 Lab Support 8,804.66 Temporary Employment Services a 21006 LaserAll Corporation 711.83 Printer Service Agreement 21007 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,850.00 Architectural Services 21008 Maintenance Technology Corp. 338.83 Welding Supplies 21009 Mar Vac Electronics 62.38 instrument Supplies 21010 Matt Chlor, Inc. 831.02 Valves 21011 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 43.00 Plumbing Supplies 21012 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 562.87 Tools 21013 Mec Analytical System 650.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 21014. Mesa Muffler 278.30 Truck Supplies 21016 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 2.436.54 Software Maint.Agreement 21016 Mid-West Associates 6,915.92 Pump Supplies 21017 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 17.147.78 Mechanical Repairs 21018 Mission Janitorial 154.95 Janitorial Supplies 21019 Mission Uniform Service 4,709.58 Uniform Rentals 21020 Moreland&Associates 7,87825 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 21021 MotoPhoto 9.75 Photographic Services 21022 Municipal Treasurers'Association 222.00 Membership 21023 Nasco 237.83 Instrument Supplies 21024 National Micr000mp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 21025 Institute for National Measurement 881.95 Lab Supplies Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7137/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21026 Neal Supply Co. 48.49 Plumbing Supplies 21027 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 552.44 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 21028 Ninyo&Moore 1,044.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 21029 The Norco Companies 145.00 Mail Delivery Service 21030 NAS Associates, Inc. 1.591.50 Lab Services 21031 Network Solutions Group 4,880.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 21032 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,190.92 Office Supplies 21033 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 148.17 Plumbing Supplies 21034 Orange County Forum 450.00 Registration 21035 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 182.52 Electrical Supplies 21036 Orr Safety 9.550.52 Safety Supplies 21037 Oxygen Service Company 2.758.19 Specialty Gases 21038 OCB Reprographics 2.153.87 Printing Service-Spec P-173 21039 County of Orange 83.50 Permit Fees 21040 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 158.28 Electrical Supplies 21041 Pacific Bell 1,106.14 Telephone Services 21042 Pacific Mechanical Supply 374.64 Plumbing Supplies 21043 Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. 4.592.17 Software 21044 Pagenet 1,483.73 Rental Equipment rr 21045 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,532.83 Time 21046 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 700.38 Janitorial Supplies 21047 Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. 202.91 Lab Supplies 21048 Pitney Bowes 407.83 Postage Machine Service Agreement 21049 Polydyne,Inc. 24,431.33 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 21060 Positive Formulators,Inc. 272.68 Chemicals-Pest Control 21051 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 21052 Quickstad Technologies 15.20 Training Registration Remaining Balance 21053 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 21054 Reliastar 24,750.07 Employee Medical Health Premium 21055 Remedy Temp 5,421.82 Temporary Employment Services 21056 Rosemount Analytical Inc. 568.62 Instrument Supplies 21057 RM Controls 287.73 Instrument Supplies 21058 RPM Electric Motors 1,026.69 Electric Motor Repair 21059 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1,187.94 Soil Materials 21060 Safety-IOeen 409.99 Service Agreement 210SI Laidiaw Environmental Services 5,135.00 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 21062 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 11.36 Mechanical Supplies 21063 Schaners Waste Water Products,Inc. 13,602.60 Chemical-Tank Cleaning 21064 Schwing America.Inc. 1,676.56 Pump Supplies 21065 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,409.20 Specialty Gases 21066 Second-Sun 458.89 Light Fixtures Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 7/16199 to 7131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21087 Secretary of State 6.50 Publication 21068 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 903.11 Tools 21089 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 124.67 Plumbing Supplies 21070 So.Cal.Gas Company 571.11 Natural Gas 21071 South Coast Water 3.232.50 Water Softener Equipment 21072 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 785.77 Lab Supplies 21073 Sprint 38.25 Long Distance Telephone Service 21074 St. Lucie/CRC/Lewis Publishers 73.55 Publication 21075 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 47.52 Pump Supplies 21076 State Board of Equllization 811.98 Underground Storage Tank Fee 21077 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 21078 Summit Steel 1,980.06 Metal 21079 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 21080 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,295.65 Mechanical Supplies 21081 Super Chem Corporation 1,212.19 Chemicals 21082 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 208.88 Electric Cart Parts 21083 Textile Engineering Associates - 20.347.51 Belt Press Supplies 21084 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 15.272.36 Mechanical Supplies 21085 Top Hat Productions 482.56 Catering Services rt 21088 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 200.00 Seminar Registration 21087 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 272.56 Truck Supplies 21088 Truesdall Laboratories,Inc. 352.00 Lab Services Ch 21089 Teksystems 13,605.00 Temporary Employment Services 21090 U.S. Filter Corporation 2,525.50 Filters 21091 United Parcel Service 2,019.86 Parcel Services 21092 Valley Cities Supply Company 5,251.71 Plumbing Supplies 21093 Valley Splicing Co. 1,000.00 Equipment Repair 21094 Veme's Plumbing 917.34 Plumbing Supplies 21095 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8,308.73 Lab Supplies 21096 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,188.88 Security Guards 21097 Waters Corporation 9,149.16 Service Agreement-Lab Equipment 21098 Weftec'99 2,185.00 Registration 21 D99 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 6.271.05 Instrument Supplies 2110o WEF-Registration Dept. 193.32 Publication 21101 WEF Publications 231.00 Publication 21102 WESTCAS 2,200.00 Membership 21103 Xerox Corporation 8,166.97 Copier Leases 21104 Zymark Corporation 2,160.00 Lab Supplies 21105 Zenon Environmental Systems 4,000.00 Equipment Rental-Microfiltration Test Unit 21106 CNA Trust 10,068.20 Construction 5-41-1 21107 Nicholas J.Arhontes 590.00 Meefingrrraining Expense Reimb. Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7131199 r Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 2110E Catherine M.Biete 280.20 Meefing/Training Expense Relmb. 21109 Arnold G.Chavez 150.00 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb. 21110 Barbara A.Collins 439.76 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimb, 21111 Mark A. Esquer 255.65 Meeling[Training Expense Reimb. 21112 Thomas M.Flanagan 339.99 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 21113 L.Kevin Hadden 189.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21114 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 838.15 Meefingrrreining Expense Reimb. 21115 Sharon Nelius 178.00 Mestingri mining Expense Reimb. 21116 Michael L.Fetterman 1,452.83 Training Expense Reimb. 21117 Carolyn L.Thompson 112.31 V2K Expense Reimb. 21118 Simon L.Watson 378.64 MeefingrTraining Expense Reimb. 21119 Janice Debay 550.00 Meefingrimining Expense Reimb. 21120 JAMS/ENDISPUTE 7.600.00 Legal Services-United Technologies 21121 Orange County Sanitation District 513.89 Petty Cash Reimb. 21122 Robert F.Driver Associates 1,001.742.00 All Risk Property&Excess Liability Insurance 21123 Orange County Sanitation Distinct 442.550.15 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 21124 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 21,628.14 Consulting Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 21125 American Geophysical Union 603.00 Notices&Ads 21126 American Management Association 596.00 Registration 21127 Bay Area Dischargers Association 126.00 Training Registration 21128 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 21129 Bureau of Nafional Affairs 1.155.14 Publication J 21130 California Automatic Gate 85.00 Service Agreement 21131 California Journal 39.95 Subscription 21132 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 21133 Consolidated Freightways 337.50 Freight 21134 Court Trustee 1,200.64 Wage Garnishment 21135 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 2,102.20 HP Printer 21136 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 21137 Division of Chemical Health&Safety 700.00 Registration 21138 Elsevier Science 150.00 Publication 21139 Excal Visual Communications 604.75 Training Supplies 21140 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 21141 Infotec Santa Ana 1,125.00 Registration 21142 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,702.89 Dues Deduction 21143 IBM Corporation 798.07 Maint.Agreement 21144 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 971.19 Safety Supplies 21145 ITA Inc.-Toshiba Accessories 15.00 Publication 21146 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 240.00 Consulting Services 21147 LaserAll Corporation 381.01 Printer Service Agreement 21148 Lorman Education Services 179.00 Registration Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116199 to 7131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21149 Maintenance Technology Corp. 589.87 Welding Supplies 21150 Mar Vac Electronics 43.44 Instrument Supplies 21151 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 787.94 Tools 21152 M.J.Schiff 8 Associates, Inc. 481.50 Professional Services-Corrosion 21153 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,125.00 Training Registration-Computer 21154 Numatic Engineering 23.13 Publication 21155 Office Depot Business Services Div. 591.98 Office Supplies 21156 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 21157 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 21158 Orange County Water District 1,500.00 Meeting Registration 21159 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 943.02 Electrical Supplies 21160 Oxygen Service Company 235.20 Specialty Gases 21161 OC-American Society for Training 8 Development 80.00 Membership 21162 OCB Reprographics 2.021.08 Printing Service-Spec P-173 21163 OCFA 623.51 Dues Deduction 21164 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 211115 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 21166 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction 21167 Recommended Resources 48.97 Publication N: 21168 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 2,005.72 Mechanical Supplies 21169 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 201.03 Specialty Gases 21170 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 79.20 Tools 21171 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 337.22 Tools/Hardware 21172 SkillPath Seminars 297.00 Training Registration 21173 Snap-On Incorporated 3,139.65 Tools 21174 Spintex Company, Inc. 6.928.08 Janitorial Supplies 21175 State of California 134.05 Wage Garnishment 21176 Sun Healthcare Group 3,050.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 21177 SWRCB Accounting Office 10,000.00 Admin. Fee-Newport Beach Spill 21178 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,796.09 Mechanical Supplies 21179 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 200.00 Seminar Registration 21180 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 21181 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 21182 ULI-the Urban Land Institute 25.00 Registration 21183 Victor Technology 13.37 Office Supplies 21184 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 350.70 Lab Supplies 21185 Water Environment Federation 705.00 Publication 21186 Shabbir S. Bassi 340.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 21187 David M.Chafe 291.61 Meeting/lraining Expense Reimb. 21188 Kelly J.Christensen 366.75 Meeting/iraining Expense Reimb. 21189 Theodore M.Mauter - 411.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. Page 8 of c ., Claims Paid From 7/16199 to 7131199 ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 21190 Portia A. Mina 2.392.49 Employee Computer Loan Program 21191 City of Huntington Beach 1,070.00 Permit Fee-Job No.P2-60 21192 County of Orange 240.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 21193 County of Orange 7,247.96 Sewer Service Fees Admin. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 6,265,500.84 Payroll Disbursements 15014-15038 Directors'Paychecks $ 8,087.19 Payroll 7/16/99 15039-15041 Employee Paychecks 69,275A5 Termination&IDEA 15042-15179 Employee Paychecks 181,471.81 Biweekly Payroll 728/99 15180-15180 Employee Paycheck 49.524.53 Termination 39960-40396 Direct Deposit Statements 653,560.50 Biweekly Payroll 728199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 961,919.48 Wire Transfer Payments Societe Generale It 56.036.30 2199-7199 LOC Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 3,620,729.71 Semiannual Principal&Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series B COP State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 7,901,207.11 Semiannual Principal&Interest Payment on 1992 Advance Refund Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 11,577,973.12 Y ro Total Claims Paid 7116f99-7131199 $ 18.805.393.44 b Page 9 of 9 t Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 1, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Daniel Cozad James Ferryman, Vice Chair Mary Lee Don Bankhead John Collins, Past Board Chair Staff Present: Jan Debay, Board Chair Joy Neugebauer Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Anna Piercy Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Charles E. Sylvia Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Kenneth Blake, Alternate Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark Esquer, Engineering Manager Directors Absent: Dave Halverson, Engineer Peter Green Mike Moore, ECM Manager Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the July 7, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 September 1, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The members were provided with information from EPA on Y2K activities in the wastewater treatment industry. The District was asked to report on its Y2K activities and this information was included as one of the three cited case studies. Chair McGuigan also announced that a closed session will not be necessary at tonight's meeting. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson updated the members on the Kem County Biosolids Ordinance and the District's response per CEOA requirements. Staff will be meeting with LA City Sanitation and LA County Sanitation District representatives to refine the responses. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Ed Hodges explained the results of the water conservation program's toilet exchange program and the proposed program for this next year. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles explained how the District became involved in the EPA Y2K Case Study, and pointed out that there are other websites that might be of interest listed in the handout. Director Collins suggested that a press release be distributed on this. Mr. Miles then updated the members on the status of the Y2K program. Mr. Miles also provided an update on the data warehouse program. It appears that savings will be in the range of$134,000 in staff time alone. The District's permanent website will be on line this month. (10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Mark Esquer, reporting for Bob Ooten, reported that for the last four months 50% secondary final effluent flow was not achieved, though we have not been out of compliance nor was our permit conditions violated. Procedures have been made to bring the flow back to the 50% level. With the data warehouse system, monthly reports to the committee will now be prepared at the push of a button. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 September 1, 1999 (11) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli discussed the confidential memo regarding Gammon Ranch and explained the conclusion. The problem resulted from application methods rather than the product, and Pima Gro has negotiated a settlement with the farmer. Mr. Ghirelli also updated the members on ongoing activities related to the Huntington Beach closure. He explained the current thinking of why this problem surfaced. It appears to be from the Talbert Channel. However, while the source of the contamination may never be well defined, the focus of the investigation has shifted to urban runoff. The impacts of AB411 (the State beach monitoring and standards law)were also discussed. Staff will be developing a dry- weather run-off treatment policy for consideration by the Committee at a future meeting. A final report on the investigation with recommendations will be prepared. (12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. OMTS99-28: Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC) for a multi- agency Water Use Efficiency Program for an amount not to exceed $825,000 for each of the next five years. Motion: Moved, seconded, amended and duly carried to approve stairs recommendation in concept. Staff will provide more detailed cost breakdown and analysis, specifically addressing administrative costs of the program. b. OMTS99-29: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-_,Adopt Best Management Practices for Water Conservation that are cost effective to the District. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. c. OMTS99-30 1) Approve a budget amendment of$139,000 for Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, increasing the total project cost not to exceed $703,200; and 2) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC), providing for additional engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring system for eight Central Generation System engines, for an additional amount of$62,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $404,500. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 September 1, 1999 d. OMTS99-31 Approve an agreement with Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc., for an Anoxic Gas Flotation Process Demonstration, including the design and construction of a test facility and ongoing support for a one-year test, for an amount not to exceed $350,000. Staff was asked to provide periodic status reports on this project. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (14) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items ac) a. OMTS99-32: Results of Central Generation Operating Philosophy Study Mark Esquer reported on the results of the study and the recommendations. The major change would be to operate 4 engines at Plant 2 rather than 3. b. OMTS99-33: Proposed Changes in SAWPA Governance and Watershed Management along the Santa Ana River Watershed Dan Cozad, SAWPA spokesperson, discussed the role of SAWPA in the watershed, as well as alternative governance structures being considered by its Board. He also discussed the water bond that is currently being considered in Sacramento. The members questioned who would be administering the money, and forwarded additional discussion on representation to the Steering Committee, as well as discussion of specific issues. c. OMTS99-34: Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch Purchase Layne Baroldi discussed the current status of this proposed purchase. Staff was directed to continue due diligence on the Kings County section and not on the Kern County portion, and to continue to negotiate with Mr. Magan. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Blake Anderson was asked when the money from the Orange County bankruptcy would be received. The latest indication is after October 6. The Directors will be advised when the exact date is known. e Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 September 1, 1999 (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (19) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for October 6, 1999 at 5 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m. Submitted by: a Tappan Ag Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services mmittee Secretary H:\wp.dla�dmin0S)MTS\090199 mjmu s.d. OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date ToxOrd. 9/91r99 9122M AGENDA REPORT IWn Number Item Number OMr599-28 12(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: WATER CONSERVATION COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program for an amount not to exceed $825,000, for each of the next five years. SUMMARY In July, staff brought forward, to the OMTS committee, an update on the District's water conservation program. During the presentation, staff advised that in October 1998, the General Manager was authorized by the Board to enter into an agreement with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program. Under the terns of the agreement, the District was to provide a total of$183,000 in funding for three countywide programs. The Water Use Efficiency Steering Committee (WUESC) is comprised of the following agencies: City of Anaheim OCSD Coastal MWD Southern California Water Company South East Regional Reclamation Authority IRWD OCWD MWDOC The WUESC has developed a new water conservation program that should encourage greater participation in replacing inefficient toilets. It is estimated that 900,000 residential toilets could be replaced in Orange County creating annual savings of approximately 25,000 acre feet per year, approximately 25 mgd. The new program would provide the ULF toilets at no cost to the consumer. For this fiscal year, the WUESC is proposing an Ultra-Low-Flush (ULF)toilet program that would allow area residents to replace old toilets at no cost. The program would be financed with existing funds that are currently being provided by the Metropolitan Water District ($60 per toilet) and additional funds from the Orange County Water District(OCWD) ($15 per toilet)and the Orange County Sanitation District ($15 per toilet). The District is currently contributing $10 per toilet. This money along with the $60 per toilet being contributed by MWD,would completely pay for new ULF toilets for area residents. The WUESC estimates that 55,000 toilets per year could be given away at an estimated cost of $825,000 per year to the District. The program would run for five years. Because the toilets would reduce water consumption, the flow to the treatment plants would be less; thus the District would realize a decrease in costly capital monies to build infrastructure and treatment KM ft�MApa,e.A�%1900e 4Aos R*o 12(c)me Page facilities. Attachment A shows the economic benefits to OCSD. This program shows a simple payback within the first quarter of fiscal year 2004/2005. In August, this issue was brought forward to the MWDOC Board of Directors. The MWDOC Board has agreed to contribute a maximum of$3.3 million toward this project, (this equates to $60/toilet). Also in August, the OCWD board agreed to fund $825,000 per year($15/toilet), with the stipulation that the District also provide$825,000 per year($15/toilet), see attached staff report. This issue was also brought forward to the August 17, 1999 Guidance Review Committee meeting. As a result, the Guidance Review Committee has requested that staff present this item to the OMTS with their recommendation that the District participate in this program in the amount of$825,000.00 per year for each of the next 5 years. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this item. Background Historically, the District has been committed to the objectives of water reuse and water conservation. Water reuse (reclamation) efforts have been focused on a cooperative association with the Orange County Water District (OCWD). Additionally,water agencies within the District's service area have actively developed and operated water conservation programs in response to the need to prudently manage California's limited water resources. The District first dealt with these issues in its 1989 Master Plan (volume 3) and is dedicating another entire volume of the soon to be released Strategic Plan. In November 1996, the California Urban Water Agencies and the Environmental Water Caucus established principles supporting the joint development and advancement of an urban water conservation framework as part of the CALFED Water Use Efficiency Common Program, The Water Use Efficiency Common Program proposed several strategies to promote more efficient allocation and use of water from the Bay-Delta watershed. Urban water conservation is one of these strategies. Efforts to improve urban water use efficiency in California have been underway for some time. The 1991 signing of the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California greatly advanced urban water management by providing water agencies a consensus-based framework in which to implement water conservation Best Management Practices (BMP). There are 14 identified and accepted BMP's available today. BMP 2 deals with Residential Plumbing Retrofit; BMP 6 deals with High-Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs; BMP 9 deals with Conservation Programs for Commercial, Industrial, and Institution Accounts; and BMP 14 deals with the Residential Ultra Low Flush Toilet(ULFT) Replacement Programs. The Water Use Efficiency Common Program that the District is involved in with MWDOC addresses an approach that staff believes best addresses a total of 8 of the14 BMP's. OCSD Economic Benefits The reduction of wastewater flows can, (1) reduce operating costs for the collection, treatment, and outfall systems; and (2) delay and or reduce future capital improvements. The primary source of cost savings is from delaying the need for and/or reducing the size of capital improvements. The secondary source of savings is from reduced energy consumption and other operations and maintenance savings from chemicals and labor. xwn.eu*.nennnrtsiawao.w R.2on.is.q� 28..Page2 Volume 7 of the District's Strategic Plan deals with the issue of Water Reuse and Water Conservation. Attachment C to that document is a June 1997 survey of Programs and Potential Benefits to the District. In that report Camp Dresser McKee (CDM) noted that, "Combining the projected cost savings per gallon for capital construction and energy, the total expected benefit to the District is$112,755 per mgd per year of reduced, sustainable flows. This converts to approximately$0.113 per gallon/day per year of reduced flow." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY $400,000.00 was allocated for water conservation in this years CIP budget. Staff believes that this program will cost$825,000 and is requesting that$425,000 be transferred from the $3.5 million Cooperative Projects Program to supplement this shortfall. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line item: Section 8, Pages 204 and 207) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff budgeted $400,000 under the Water Management portion in this year's fiscal CIP budget (Section 8, page 207)and $3,475,400 under the Cooperative Projects Inflow/Infiltration Program (Section 8, page 204). Staff anticipated that$2,257,656 would be required to complete this year's Cooperative Projects Program, leaving $1,217,744 in funds available for other cooperative projects programs. With a transfer of$425,000 from the Cooperative Projects Program budget to the Water Management program there present a minimal effect on the budget. ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Simple Payback Analysis (Attachment A) 2. MWDOC Agenda Item Submittal, dated July 14, 1999 (Attachment B) EEH: pjm Kwvemb.wwr�rsieee.+w�wws�eyero.w�rsao-ze.e:Fege 3 Attachment A Conceptual Residential Toilet Retrofit Program 10-year simple payback anaylsis OCSD Service Area A B C D E IF H 1 J Fiscal Existing New Year-end Cumulative Year-end Cumulative Annual Cumulative Economic Year Toilets Toilets Toilets Yr-end Reduction Cost Savings Cost Savings Contribution Contribution Analysis3 (B+C=D) gallons' (E x$0.113=F)3 (G-I =J) 1997/1998 0 14,875 14,875 461.571 $ 62.158 $ 52,158 $ 98,200 $ 98,200 $ (46.042) 1998/1999 14,875 12.253 27.128 841,782 95,121 147.279 150,000 248,200 $ (100,921) 1999/2000 27,128 55,000 82,128 2,548,432 287,973 435,252 825,000 1,073,200 $ (637.948) 2000/2001 82,128 55,000 137.128 4,255,082 480,824 916.076 825,000 1,898,200 $ (982,124) 2001/2002 137,128 55,000 192,128 5,961,732 673,676 1,589,752 825,000 2.723,200 $ (1,133.448) 20022003 192,128 55,D00 247,128 7,668,382 866,527 2.456.279 825,000 3.548,200 $ (1,091,921) 20032004 247,128 55,000 302,128 9,375,032 1.059,379 3.515,657 825,000 4.373,200 $ (857,543) 20042005 302,128 302.128 9,375,032 1,059,379 4,576.036 4,373.200 $ 201,836 20052006 302.128 302,128 9,375,032 1.059,379 5,634,415 4.373,200 '$ 1,261,215 20062007 302,128 302,128 9.375,032 1,059,379 6,693,793 4,373,200 $ 2,320,593 'This value is a combination of actual single-family(63%)and multi-family(37%)retrofits or 31.03 gallons per day per toilet savings based upon fixture count data provided by MWDOC 3 This value assumes avoided costs for capital and O8M of$0.113/gallon per Volume 7 of the District's Strategic Plan 3 Economic Analysis does not include a cost figure for lost opportunity cost ATTACHMENT B WATER ISSUES COMMITTEE MEETING July 14, 1999 -- AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 FIVE YEAR ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILET CONSERVATION PROGRAM COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Contingent upon approval of participation by the Orange County Sanitation District, authorize financial participation with the Metropolitan Water District and Orange County Sanitation District in a five-year Ultra-Low-Flush Toilet conservation program to allow area residents to replace old toilets at no cost, at a cost to OCWD of $15 per toilet (not to exceed $825,000 per year to OCWD), the cost of which will be offset by a decrease in the necessary MWD replenishment water purchases in the future. v AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting date: July 14, 1999 Budgeted: N/A Program/Line Item No.: N/A To: Water Issues Cte/Bd of Directors Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: N/A Staff Contact: John C. Kennedy CEQA Compliance: N/A SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSERVATION PROGRAM SUMMARY The Water Use Efficiency Steering Committee (WUESC) is proposing an Ultra-Low-Flush (ULF) toilet program that would allow area residents to replace old toilets at no cost. The program would be financed with existing funds that are currently being provided by the Metropolitan Water District ($60 per toilet) and additional funds from the District ($15 per toilet) and the Orange County Sanitation District ($15 per toilet). The committee estimates that 55,000 toilets per year (savings of 1 ,700 afy) could be replaced at an estimated cost of $825,000 per year to the District. The program would run for five years. Because the toilets would reduce water consumption, groundwater production would be less, thus the District would realize a decrease in necessary MWD replenishment water purchases in the future. The annual net savings to the District are estimated at approximately $88,000. The recently completed Water Master Plan assumed that the OCWD service area would conserve an additional 30,000 afy by the year 2020 through local and regional efforts. This program would conserve approximately 8,500 afy (five years x 1 ,700 afy). The Orange County Sanitation District has agreed to contribute a maximum of $825,000 per year. The program has also been reviewed by the Producers Technical Advisory Committee. The program would have no impact on the Replenishment Assessment. RECOMMENDATION Consider adoption of proposed conservation program and agendize action for consideration at the July 21 Board meeting. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS Existing OCWD Conservation Program The District's existing conservation program was established in 1996 and encourages the producers to install ULF toilets and low flow shower heads. The program is structured in a manner that allows the producer to pump above the Basin Production Percentage (BPP) without incurring the Basin Equity Assessment (BEA). The amount of pumping above the r BPP is based upon the amount of water conserved. The District realizes savings from the program in the form of reduced MWD replenishment water purchases. However the District does not receive BEA revenues for production above the BPP resulting in a net neutral financial impact. Details of the existing program are provided as attachment A. Existing ULF toilet program The existing ULF program is administered by the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC). Residents are required to pay $20 per toilet. The program receives a $60 per toilet subsidy from MWD and a $10 per toilet subsidy from OCSD. This program is beginning to experience less participation and will eventually exist at a low level. In addition the WUESC believes that the local water districts should be more aggressive in replacing inefficient toilets. Proposed ULF program The WUESC is comprised of the following members and supporting staff: Ed Aghjayan, Chair City of Anaheim Blake Anderson OCSD Ron Van Blarcom Coastal MWD Kirk Brewer Southern California Water Company Dave Caretto South East Regional Reclamation Authority Paul Jones IRWD Don McIntyre OCSD Bill Mills OCWD Stan Sprague MWDOC The committee has developed a new program that should encourage greater participation in replacing inefficient toilets. It is estimated that 900,000 residential toilets could be replaced in Orange County creating an annual savings of approximately 25,000 afy. The new program would provide the ULF toilets at no cost to the consumer. The committee is requesting the OCWD and the Orange County Sanitation District to both contribute $15 per toilet for the new program. The Sanitation District currently contributes $10 per toilet. This money along with the $60 per toilet being contributed by MWD, would completely pay for new ULF toilets for area residents. Financial Impact to OCWD The District would financially benefit from the new program. Assuming that each toilet only last a minimum of 10 years and at 6% interest, the annual cost to the District is approximately $112,000 per year. Groundwater production would be decreased by approximately 1,275 afy, which would reduce required MWD replenishment water purchases saving the District approximately $200,000 per year. The resulting net saving for OCWD is approximately $88,000 per year. If approved the District would receive monthly bills from MWDOC based upon the amount of toilets retrofitted. Using annual retrofit estimates, OCWD would pay MWDOC 25% of the District's estimated program cost at the beginning of each water year. Each monthly bill would then be reduced 25%. An end of year reconciliation would adjust the final monthly invoice. Because the District's annual water budget is determined using the five year average annually overdraft calculation, the District would initially incur expenses from the program before any savings (reduced water purchases) were realized. Staff would issue small amounts of commercial paper if necessary to initially fund the program and would repay the debt with the eventually program savings. George Martin from the City of Anaheim and Joe Berg from the Municipal Water District of Orange County will make a presentation to the Committee. PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S) OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date Tn]Lerd. 9/01/99 9/R/99 AGENDA REPORT Imm Numtw Rem Number 0 ,T599-29 12(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR WATER CONSERVATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-16, Supporting Best Management Practices for Water Conservation. Summary The CALFED Bay-Delta program is the driving force for water conservation in California. This program is a collaboration between federal and state agencies to develop a long-term solution to water supply and environmental problems affecting the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta estuary (the Bay-Delta). The Bay-Delta is critical to California's water supply as it provides two-thirds of the state's drinking water. Because many of the environmental problems affecting the Bay-Delta are associated with the rate at which the Bay-Defta's water is used for drinking and irrigation water, the CALFED program strongly supports water conservation and efficient water use as part of any long-term solution. In 1991, the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California (MOU) was created and signed by more than 145 retail and wholesale water agencies throughout the State. They include: 1. City of Anaheim 2. Capistrano Beach Water District 3. Coastal Municipal Water District 4. El Toro Water District 5. City of Fullerton 6. City of Garden Grove 7. Irvine Ranch Water District 8. Los Alisos Water District 9. Mesa Consolidated Water District 10. Moulton Niguel Water District 11. Municipal Water District of Orange County 12. County of Orange 13. Orange County Water District 14. San Juan Capistrano Water Services 15. Southern Califomia Water Company 16. South Coast Water District 17. Trabuco Canyon Water District 18. Water Advisory Committee of Orange County As part of the MOU, these agencies have agreed to implement the Best Management Practices (BMP's) as they pertain to water conservation. These BMP's include 14 water use efficiency programs that reduce consumption and thereby increase supply reliability. The BMP's include: rvWn1NYlV.p.W`+i�•BwN A,w q 11M& �F� \31QI. Paget 1. Residential Indoor and Outdoor Water Use Surveys 2. Residential Plumbing Fixture Retrofits 3. Distribution System Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair 4. Metering with Commodity Rates 5. Landscape Irrigation Budgets 6. High Efficiency Clothes Washers 7. Public Information 8. School Education 9. Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Audits and Incentives 10. Wholesale Water Agency Assistance 11. Conservation Pricing 12. Water Conservation Coordinator 13. Water Waste Prohibitions 14. Ultra-Low-Flush Toilets These BMP guidelines only require those measures that are cost effective for a local agency to be implemented. Attached for your guidance and information is a chart that shows where the District is relative to the implementation of the BMPs. Today, these BMPs are recognized throughout the world as a solid framework to advance the efficient use of our valuable water resources. CALFED has included a Water Use Efficiency Element in their Bay-Delta Solution to ensure increased efficient use of water exported from the Bay-Delta area. By proactively implementing BMPs in Orange County, we can directly influence the final CALFED solutions that are developed. On August 17, 1999, staff met with the Guidance Review Committee to discuss this issue. Staff believes that if the District is requiring our member cities to adhere to the BMPs as a requirement for them to participate in the Cooperative Projects Program, then the District should also be held to a similar standard. Staff believes that the attached chart clearly indicates that we are currently implementing all BMPs that we believe are cost effective. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Since the guidelines only require those measures that are cost effective for a local agency to be implemented, adoption of the BMPs will have little to no fiscal impact on the District. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line item: page ) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A n.ev,u.n�wy Aep Re, vh%1999 R.po,amww.o ulm ma Paget V CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMEWS Resolution No. OCSD 99-16 EEH: fw \YWovWOhlMy EbdpmEaWnaN Aga aRepd %IMe fd ApeMa Re1wb\LUdBNmn 12(0,dl Page v Orange county sanitation Clearer California Urban Water Conservation Council Memorandum of Understanding Signatory Requirements for BMPS: -OCSD would participate in BMPS where it is cost-effective. BMP OCSD Involvement' CICSD Meets BMP? 1 Water Survey Programs for Single None currently. Potential contribution to increase No. Family Residential and Multi-Family number of surveys conducted annually. MWDOC Residential Customers currently spends about$375,000 per year. A Cost/benefit analysis would need to be done to determine If OCSD should be involved. 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofits OCSD has contributed$40,000 to the Focus on Yes. OC Water Future Study 3 System Water Audits, Leak Not applicable to OCSD. This BMP is geared N/A Detection and Repair solely toward retail water purveyors 4 Metering With Commodity Rates for OCSO Source Control Program requires large Yes. All New Connections and Retrofit of water users to pay user fees based on flow Existing Connections volume. New rate structure is designed to charge in proportion to flow and strength for commercial and residential users. 5 Large Landscape Conservation None. Outdoor use for landscaping doesn't N/A Programs and Incentives impact OCSD flows or costs. e High Efficiency Washing Machine None currently. OCSD Could fund washing No. Rebate Programs machine rebates similar to ultra low flush toilet (ULFT)program. MWDOC will be proposing OCSD fundino contribution. 7 Public Information Programs OCSD has worked with MWDOC to market Yes. ULFTs and has participated in public outreach efforts. 8 School Education Programs OCSD outreach such as OC Fair. Yes. 9 Conservagon Programs for OCSD Source Control Division has been working No. Commercial, Industrial, and with MWDOC to develop a commercial/industrial Institutional Accounts water conservation program. MWDOC will propose expanding residential toilet retrofit program to include commercial/industrial applications. 10 Wholesale Agency Assistance OCSD has provided funding and coordination with Yes. Programs MWDOC, such as toilet retrofit funding. 11 Conservation Pricing OCSD user and connection fees are charged in Yes. Proportion to sewage flow. 12 Conservation Coordinator OCSO has assigned staff to work on Yes. Conservation. 13 Water Waste Prohibition This applies to retail agencies in droughts. N/A 14 Residential ULFT Replacement OCSO participates in ULFT retrofit rebates. Yes. Programs 8/24/19992:30 PM waterconsbmps 4 RESOUTION NO, OCSD 99-16 SUPPORTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR WATER CONSERVATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SUPPORTING THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR WATER CONSERVATION WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("Districr) has long supported, and continues to support, the policy of water conservation; and, WHEREAS, in 1997, the California Urban Water Conservation Council adopted the Best Management Practices for Water Conservation ("BMP's"). These BMP's assure the safe and beneficial use of water conservation when properly managed in accordance with the California Urban Water Conservation Council's Memorandum of Understanding, and, WHEREAS, the District supports and implements the BMP's found in the California Urban Water Conservation's Memorandum of Understanding, in order to promote a standard of excellence for applying water conservation practices; and, WHEREAS, as part of the District's Cooperative Projects Program, the Guidance Review Committee has required that all Cities and Special Districts within the District's service area shall adopt the BMP's for water conservation, and, WHEREAS, the District maintains a diverse program of water conservation consistent with the District's mission to protect public health and the environment through excellence in wastewater systems, and WHEREAS, the District desires to promote the continuance of water conservation in its service area in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and is sensitive to the needs of the communities involved. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Board of Directors supports the policy of water conservation. 1 Section 2: That the Board of Directors supports the Best Management Practices for Water Conservation, as adopted by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. Section 3: That the Board of Directors supports the use of the Best Management Practices, as they apply to water conservation at its Treatment Plant Facilities and throughout the District's service area. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 22, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H:�.p.dlsadMn\ss\R s iW .s iesswcsDs 16.da 2 OMTS COMMITTEE NeWng Date To ad.Br dr. 911/99 9/27/99 AGENDA REPORT 1emNumt 1BmNumba OMT599-30 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager, Air Quality & Special Projects SUBJECT: INSTALLATION OF PARAMETRIC EMISSIONS MONITORING SYSTEM ON THE CENTRAL GENERATION SYSTEM ENGINES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve a budget amendment of$139,000 for Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, increasing the total project cost not to exceed $703,200; and 2) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC), providing for additional engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an additional amount of$62,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $404,500. SUMMARY The District currently operates and maintains Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems that measure Oxides of Nitrogen emissions from each of the eight Central Generation System (CGS) engines. Due to aging equipment, lack of vendor support, and Y2K reliability issues, the monitoring system is placing the District in risk of non- compliance with our SCAQMD permit conditions and the cost of maintaining the monitoring system has been steadily increasing. In response to these concerns, Staff conducted a study in fiscal year 1997/98 to evaluate replacement options. The results of the study recommended replacement with a Parametric Emission Monitoring System. The new monitoring system utilizes engine- operating parameters to determine NOx emissions from the engines. Installation of the new monitoring system will provide the District with several advantages over the present system. The advantages include annual 0&M savings; reliable and accurate compliance determination; a diagnostic tool for evaluating engine health and performance; and future flexibility to monitor other pollutants as required. The study also recommended the use of a new technology that utilizes the output from Fiber Optic Pressure Sensors. The sensors are installed in each engine cylinder to determine emissions. This technology offers considerable cost savings in maintenance of the engines (>$150,000 per year in savings compared to the present system) and provides the necessary emissions determination accuracy that can meet SCAQMD's new stringent standard. In September 1998 the Board authorized $522,500 for the design, installation and startup of the new monitoring system on all eight CGS engines. In June 1999, Staff \VW,WO1My.CbYp�klewE Ag��%lM BUN Apm HepN�12(m) Rw . MW Page 1 received Budget approval in the 1999/00 CIP to install the new monitoring system on all eight CGS engines at a cost of$564.200. This included $342,000 to Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC) for engineering and installation services, $95,000 to a source testing firm for emissions measurement, $43,000 for internal labor and materials, $8,700 for permits, $47,500 in contingency funds for contract services and $28,000 for previous years planning and studies. The technology being installed was new and the regulatory certification requirements for the new monitoring systems at that time were undefined. In order to better define the costs, Staff proposed designing, installing and certifying on one engine first and then proceeding with the remaining seven engines. This phased approach would enable us to ensure that the technology works and accurately define certification and installation costs for the remaining engines. Staff has completed installation and certification testing on the one engine. The technology is working accurately and reliably. Staff has also prepared cost estimates for installing the new monitoring system on the remaining seven engines. In order to complete the work on the remaining engines the engineering consultant's (AETC) contract will need to be increased to cover the remaining work due to a better definition of the actual scope based on the one engine's installation. However, no additional contractual services funds are required since funds previously authorized in September 1998 for emissions source testing and contingency are available. The past budgets for in-house labor for regulatory coordination, consultant support during installation, startup and certification, and portions of the monitoring system materials installation will exceed original estimates. The project has taken considerably more in house staff support than originally estimated. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project was budgeted in the 1999/00 Construction Projects CIP budget at total project cost of$564,200. Based on the costs experienced with the installation of the new monitoring equipment on the first engine the budget scope can be better defined. The estimated total project cost for installation of the monitoring system on all eight engines is now$703,200, an increase of$139,000. This includes $404,500 for consultant services to conduct studies, design, installation and certification of the monitoring system, $80,000 for emissions source testing, $15,350 for permits, and $203,350 for internal labor, materials and previous years planning and studies. A breakdown of the project costs is listed in Table 1. \Y JanWael Mq Gelapenm'GMiSIBddApeMa gepwl5epenl'eMMiSW-MI Oa q- d\oee Page 2 Table 1 - Cost Summary v' Cost Estimate Difference Revised Costs AETC Consultant $342 000 $62 500 $404 500 SourceTest/Permits $95,000 ($15000) $80.000 Contingency $47,500 ($47,500) $0 Contractual $484,500 $0 $484,500 Services Subtotal Internal Labor& $43,000 $132.350 $175,350 Materials Permits $8700 $6,650 $15350 97/98 Studies $28 000 $0 $26 000 Project Budget 98/99 $564,200 $139,000 $703,200 Based upon a $703,200 total project costs and $150,000 annual saving compared to labor and parts for the old monitoring system, payback period for the project is under 4.5 years. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) X This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff request authorization for a supplemental appropriation to the authorized 1999/00 CIP budget to cover increased material costs, and increased staff support costs from $564,200 to $703,200. Staff support from Maintenance, the Special Projects Division and Information Technology have been substantially more than originally estimated. More maintenance and materials to install the fiber optic infrastructure for the monitoring system and significantly more staff time associated with permitting and certification of the monitoring system were not anticipated. Additionally, staff request an authorization increase of$62,500 in the consultants (AETC) cost to increase fees from $342,000 to $404,500 to support completion of the installation of the new emission monitoring equipment. ALTERNATIVES None, due to the need to have a fully functional, permittable, low maintenance emission monitoring system. CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS None \VMa,W,Yttry EmY,p4a10YtA1 WBApeMv Re ��--� Re.YM, Wow Page 3 OMTS COMMITTEE Memng Ceee To ad.of or. 09/01/99 09/22ry9 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Hem Number OWS99+31 12(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager, Air Quality & Special Projects SUBJECT: ANOXIC GAS FLOTATION (AGF) PROCESS DEMONSTRATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an agreement with Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc., for an Anoxic Gas Flotation Process Demonstration, including design and construction of a test facility and ongoing support for a one-year test, for an amount not to exceed $318,000 and an additional contingency of$32,000. SUMMARY The purpose of anaerobic digestion at the District is to stabilize (treat) organic solids produced in the primary and secondary treatment processes to prepare the solids for land disposal. Stabilization is a process whereby the solids are heated, mixed, and retained in a digester while bacteria break dawn the solids, which kills pathogens and produces digester gas. The purpose of the Anoxic Gas Flotation (AGF) system, which is a proprietary process from Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc. (Cyclus) is to modify conventional anaerobic digestion to improve the solids destruction, increase digester capacity, and increase digester gas production. The AGF process uses a unique flotation device to separate and concentrate the solid material in a digester. The solids are put back into the digester for further stabilization. Subsequently, digested solids also can be heated to a higher temperature (pasteurized) and further digested at conventional temperatures in a second vessel. This overall process is called "2-stage AGF," and it increases the overall solids destruction and digester gas yield and produces Class A biosolids. By increasing the amount of time the solids stay in the digesters, the conversion of solids to methane gas is enhanced without sacrificing the overall throughput of sludge to the digesters. The net effects are to increase the solids destruction and biogas production and to decrease the amount of residual solids that must be dewatered and disposed of. Since AGF digesters operate with higher solids concentrations than conventional digesters, expansion costs for new digesters and associated solids handling facilities to meet future higher influent flows can be reduced or avoided. X hry tlh*�Agw ReV�1WR WApy MpabVAYVd1Am 12H.Ee[ R«;,,.. WIM Page 1 Based on existing AGF performance data (as noted in the Background section below) and appropriate District operating data, a performance and cost analysis shows that with single stage AGF, the District's current annual solids operating costs would be reduced by $1.0 million, or about 15%. If 2-stage AGF were used, the annual savings would be $2.1 million. Over 20 years, the present value of these operating cost savings could equal $12 million and $26 million, respectively. At the projected year 2020 solids production, these annual savings would approximately double. A preliminary analysis also indicates that no new digesters, belt presses, or biosolids processing or storage facilities would be needed to meet the projected year 2020 flows if AGF proved usable. Taken together, the present value of the construction and operating cost savings would approach $200 million over the 20 years. The projected cost to install AGF technology is $9-18 million depending upon whether single stage or 2-stage AGF is used. Staff recommends demonstrating the 2-stage AGF process on District solids before committing to a full-scale implementation program. A process demonstration program is proposed that would use a pilot plant constructed for that purpose. The pilot plant would be designed with the flexibility to continue as a general purpose digestion test facility after the AGF tests were completed. After a one-year test of the AGF process, the proprietary equipment would be returned to the vendor, leaving a fully functional two-stage digester pilot plant for the District's continuing use. The cost for the pilot plant and the vendor's involvement in the AGF test would be less than $318,000. The total project cost, including District maintenance, laboratory, and project management charges, is estimated at $387,000 over three fiscal years (1999-2000 through 2001-2002). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY A not-to-exceed contract for $318,000 is being requested. The final cost will be less than this amount because Cyclus will repurchase the AGF separator at the end of the test period for a mutually agreeable price. The cost elements for the project are shown below. Cyclus (engineering, equipment, 1-year project support) $ 318,000 Additional installation costs (piping and electrical) $ 21,000 Laboratory $ 7,000 Div. 880 project management and analysis $ 35.000 Contingency(10% of internal costs) $ 6.000 Total $ 387,000 N\W 0M11W^LHaN�YniG PeWb\IKB 6vitl IgnL R�pyb'ttWW,„\'mI.C% R- &1^ Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (FY 99-00 tine item: CLP. Smtion s,P9 14) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable(information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Backaround The AGF process has been used for several years in industry(for example, treating potato processing waste in Idaho). An earlier version of the process was tested in a small pilot plant for one year by King County DNR (Seattle Metro), and the Southwest Suburban Sewer District (SSSD) currently is operating a small full-scale (0.5 MGD) plant. After two months' operation at steady stale, the SSSD plant is showing that the AGF separator is working as expected, the biogas production has increased as predicted, and less polymer and electricity are being used than was predicted. In addition, the solids loading capacity of the belt presses has been more than doubled, and the dewatered cake solids content has increased from 18.6% to 24.5%. Significant Impacts If it performs as expected, adding the AGF process to the District's digesters would significantly reduce or eliminate the need to build any more digesters, belt presses, or biosolids storage facilities to meet the year 2020 flow predictions. This would eliminate capital costs of$161 million. Digester modifications to meet the year 2020 solids flows are estimated to cost $8 million for single stage AGF or $17 million for 2-stage AGF. In addition, the AGF process would reduce annual operating costs by as much as $3.6 million (at the year 2020 flows). The present value of the savings over 20 years would approach $200 million. Table 1 presents the breakdown of expected annual savings (in 1999 dollars)for both AGF options. Table 1. ANNUAL OPERATING SAVINGS Single Stage AGF 2-Stage AGF Category 1 "432,000 $ 20 1999 2020 Biosolids disposal $ 1415,000 $ 3,161.000 $ 4,426 000 Gas production $ 48.000 E 700 000 $ 882,000 Chemical use $ 55000 $ 000 E 72,000 Energyuse $ 1135 000 $ 1,718 000 E 1 422,000Total Savin s $ 1773 000 E 2120 000 E 3 814,000 N:Iwy.®�,9orE 12M 6s x. am Page 3 f Proiect Scope A test of the AGF process in a specially-designed pilot plant at Plant 1 is recommended. The vendor has completed the conceptual design of a suitable pilot plant that would include a primary digester, an AGF solids separator, a second-stage AGF system, and a gas handling system. Using two 2000-gallon vessels, the facility would process up to 400 gal/day of primary, secondary, or mixed sludge. A contract with the vendor not to exceed $318,000 is recommended for the pilot plant design, construction, and start-up, and on-going engineering support services for a one-year test program. Eliminating the second stage could reduce the equipment cost by about $60,000. This option is not recommended for several reasons. The re-digestion step substantially increases the overall AGF process performance and a cost analysis shows that it would nearly double the operating cost savings achieved by the District with full-scale AGF. Also, the second stage is needed to research production of a Class A biosolids product, which is becoming increasingly important to the District. The evaluation of this technology to produce a Class A biosolids is being coordinated with the District's overall evaluation of alternative management strategies for our sludge and/or biosolids. Finally, eliminating the second digester vessel would limit the facility to single-stage digestion tests after the AGF tests were completed. This would remove much of the pilot plant's flexibility, eliminating the capability to test two- stage (or parallel single-stage) digester configurations. ALTERNATIVES 1. Conduct a demonstration of the AGF process at District facilities. This will verify the process performance and benefits that have been projected by the vendor. If the AGF claims are confirmed and the process subsequently is implemented, the District has the potential to avoid major capital construction projects and significantly reduce the annual solids management costs. 2. Do not test the AGF process. This will save the cost of the project, but there is no other way to obtain comparable data to determine the performance of the AGF facilities at the District. 3. Test other processes to improve digester efficiency or decrease the residual solids dewatering costs. Other digester variations (e.g., high temperature thermophilic digestion) and dewatering options (e.g., centrifuges; fired biosolids dryers) exist and are the subjects of continuing investigation by the District. However, none of them offer the combination of digester efficiency improvement and dewatering improvement that will both reduce the District's operating costs and reduce the capital construction needed to meet the projected flow increases HM ,ftUyW�Map RRpnh%IM8 M•peMv RgpbtlBBWbm 12M. Rabet souse Page 4 over the next 20 years. In this respect, the AGF process is unique, and because it is a proprietary process, no competitive vendor to Cyclus exists. CECA FINDINGS CEQA requirements are not applicable to this project. ATTACHMENTS None. RJO/EMT/jpb H ley.O1� MApdLL+Rq 11�B W AWi Rgvn�12M aoc R. W. Page 5 e, DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, September 2, 1999, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, September 2, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum was not present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Steve Anderson Gary Streed, Director of Finance John Collins, Past Chair Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jack Mauller John Linder, Construction Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Lynn Daucher Jeff Shubik, Project Manager Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Russell Patterson Christina Shea OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Board Chair Mary Lee Daniel Cozad (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the July 1, 1999 PDC Committee meeting will be considered at the September 22, 1999 regular Board meeting. v PDC Committee Minutes f Page 2 September 2, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode stated that because of the lack of a quorum the agenda items would be discussed and then forwarded to the Directors at the September 22, 1999 regular Board meeting for consideration. Director Eckenrode also stated that he would like to see more cooperation between agencies as experienced during the recent beach closure and he suggested a recommendation be forwarded to FAHR Committee that funds be included in next year's budget for these types of activities. No action was taken on this suggestion. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson reported that"It ain't us." It appears that the recent contamination is the result of discharges into the Talbert Channel from several Huntington Beach urban water pumping stations. Diversions are in place to put this flow into the sewer system for the next 45 days. This includes the dewatering flow from the hotel construction site on Pacific Coast Highway. The only portion of the beach that is closed is between the river mouth and Brookhurst The City of Huntington Beach is attempting to characterize the water in the Talbert Channel and is continuing to look for other sources. The OC Health Care Agency and OCSD will continue to sample the surfzone twice daily. Recovery and assignment of costs was discussed. This will be presented to the FAHR Committee and a recommendation will be forwarded to the Board for a decision at a future meeting. Mr. Anderson also updated the members on the bankruptcy. Director Swan had requested information on when the funds would be disbursed. It appears that this will occur on October 5 or 6, after Judge Ryan releases the litigation receipts. OCIP representatives have filed declarations and these will be taken under consideration by Judge Ryan and could delay disbursements. Staff is working on strategies to prevent Kem County from banning biosolids. There is a hearing on October 5 and only the attorneys will be giving oral testimony. Staff was directed to continue to follow the State Water Resources Control Board's draft Biosolids EIR, specifically addressing the dust issue. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin introduced Matt Smith, the new Engineering Supervisor. The draft of the Final EIR is being finalized and will be ready for review by the Ad Hoc Committee by the middle of the month. A determination will be made on when to schedule this meeting at the September 8 FAHR Committee meeting. At the last PDC Committee meeting, the members asked to be updated on staff activities regarding the GWRS project. Jim Herberg reported that two advisory teams have been formed, consisting of staff members from OCWD and OCSD, that will address technical and management issues. Schedules and outlines for deliverables have been developed. ' PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 September 2, 1999 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS The Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5% were not reviewed. (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-f) Because of a lack of a quorum, these items will be considered at the September 22, 1999 regular Board Meeting. Staff briefed the Directors on these items and comments and/or changes are noted following each item. a. PDC 99.39 (1) Ratify Change Order 4 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing a credit of $38,134, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,423,631; and (2) accept Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Fleming Engineering, Inc. Construction Manager John Linder indicated that this is an adjustment of engineers quantities change order and the project is complete. b. PDC 99-40 (1) Ratify Change Order 2 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57,with First Fire Systems, Inc., authorizing a credit of$3,260 and a time extension of 79 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $357,450.49; and (2) accept Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Staff will revised the agenda report before submitting to the Board to include the current contract completion date and the actual completion date. C. PDC 99-41 (1) Approve a budget increase of$42,196 to Improvements to Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, for a total revised project budget of$6,386,196, and (2) ratify Change Order 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3. with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$35,191 and 26 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $5,269,546. John Linder slated that this contract is complete and the City of La Habra will be paying about $550,000 for street work performed by the contractor. That street work did delay the project and liquidated damages have been calculated. The contractor, Mladen Buntich, has submitted a claim for additional costs because of the delays. Staff will be negotiating with the City and the contractor to resolve the claim. PDC Committee Minutes r Page 4 September 2, 1999 d. POC 99-42 (1) Approve Addendum 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, providing for additional construction support services, for an additional amount of$27,687, increasing the total contract amount to not to exceed $515,632; and (2) and approve a budget amendment of$27,687, increasing the total project budget to $5,259,687. John Linder reported that the requested cost is for additional support from the designer because of job delays. a. PDC 99-43 Approve Addendum 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, P.C., for an additional amount of$91,848 and a total amount not to exceed $2.077,376 for Electrical Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4. Doug Stewart and Jeff Shubik described the changes that necessitated this addendum, including collecting additional electrical field information, and enhancing the data base to include the new tagging system provided by Job No. J-42. f. PDC 99-35 Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-XX, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement said Policies and Procedures; and Repeal Resolution Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 9843. Director Collins asked that this item be returned to the PDC Committee in October with additional information. Staff will develop a Flow chart that details how an item is process now and the time it takes staff to prepare this item and the impact on the project timeline, and also as proposed in the revised Delegation of Authority resolution. The item will be pulled from the September 8, 1999 FAHR Committee Agenda. (12) INFORMATION ITEMS a. OMITS 99-33 Discussion of Proposed Changes in SAWPA Governance and Watershed Management along the Santa Ana River Watershed Daniel Cozad, SAWPA representative, described the process of deciding what needs to be done to address the issues surrounding the Santa Ana River watershed and the responsibilities of the SAWPA Board. The alternatives to the governance process were described. One option includes creating a new organization that will be supported by the SAWPA staff. Members of the new organization that provide funds would be voting members. A second option would create an advisory committee. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 September 2, 1999 Mr. Cozad also updated the members on the State water bond that is being considered by the legislators. Director Swan suggested that a recommendation be made to SAWPA that a written agreement be executed that provides for listed projects that prove to be non-viable b. PDC 99-44 Status Report on the Temporary Staffing Program for the Engineering Department David Ludwin announced that there are five temporary engineers on staff. Additional interviews will be scheduled. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Collins complimented staff on their efforts in addressing the issues surrounding the beach closure, with a special thank you to Michelle Tuchman for handling the press in such a professional manner under very stressful conditions. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. (17) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 7, 1999, at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:54 p.m. Submitted by: JICL e n Tappan Committee Secretary H:Mp.dtaagendaTDC)PDC99W,MIN5N90299 minO AX PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Me To a9 9/31/d.Of Dir. 9/]/999 AGENDA REPORT ItemNumW Hem Number Hem l3(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Manager SUBJECT: ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 7-17 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing a credit of$38,134, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,423,631; and (2)Accept Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Fleming Engineering, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 4 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities to Contract No. 7-17. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per calendar day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date August 21, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date April 27, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Dale May 24, 1999 Actual Completion Date May 24, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $1.317,530. Previous Authorized Changes 144,235. This Change (Deduct) (38,134.) Change Orders to Date 106,101. Percentage Increase 8.05% Amended Contract Price $1,423,631. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 5, Item b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 7-17, Orange Park Acres Trunk Sewer Replacement, consists of the construction of a new gravity sewer with manholes and upgrading the existing 12-inch sewer to a 21-inch sewer from Orange Park Boulevard to 400-feet beyond Meads Avenue. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The contract is 100% complete. The construction contract was awarded to Fleming Engineering Inc. on June 24, 1998. The following table summarizes the Change Order: ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Adjustment of Engineers $(38,134) 0 Other Quantities Total Change Order No. 4 $ 38,134 This item adjusts the contract bid items to the actual quantities incorporated into the work. See the attached change order for more information. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order SK:Ic %tobaWatal\nlglobaMgenda Draft RepodsTDC\7-17C0"RSepLdoc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7-17 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 100% Consultant PSA I $ 23.968 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 $ 36 660 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 100% Construction Contrail 1 $ 702000r461,765 $ 1,461,785 $ 1,461,765 $ 38134 $ 1423,631 $ 1,315521 93% Construction Other $ b Construction Staff $ 38,400 $ 177.175 $ 177 175 $ 177175 $ 60.345 34% Contin enc b bTOTAL $ 773.968 $ - $ 1,685,200 $ 1,685.200 $ (38,134) $ 1,647,066 $ 1.423,631 86% CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7-17 ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 8121/98 $ 1,317,530.00 $ 1,317,530.00 0.00% 250 250 CO NO. 1' 3/10/99 $ 33,291.00 $ 1,350,821.00 2.53% 10 260 CO NO. 2' 618/99 $ - $ 1,350,821.00 2.53% 0 260 CO NO. 3 7121/99 $ 110,944.00 $ 1,461,765. 12 10.95% 17 277 CO NO, 4 PENDING $ (38,134.00) $ 1,423,631.00 8.05% 0 277 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 a - Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Flemina Enaineerino, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: September 22. 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17 Counsultant: Bovle Enaineerino Corporation Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $(38. 334.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCTIONS Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 4. L.F. 21-inch VCP 260 249.00 11.00 330 (3,630.00) 5. L.F. 42-inch Casing 30 0.00 30.00 1.100 (33,000.00) 6. V.F. 60-inch ID MH 230 225.80 4.20 358 (1,504.00) Total Deduction $(38,134.00) TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(38,134.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement Contract No 7-17 Counsultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 21, 1998 Original Contract Time: 250 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: April 27, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Day Total Contract Time Extension: 27 Calendar Day Revised Contract Time: 277 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 24, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,317,530.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 144,235.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (38,134.00) Amended Contract Price $ 1,423,631.00 ' Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17 Counsultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Dale: September 22, 1999 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Mee11 Date To Sd.of Dir. 9/7/99 su99 AGENDA REPORT IMMNumbC IlemNumber PDC99-Q Item 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Project Manager SUBJECT: FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADES JOB NO. J-57 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, with First Fire Systems, Inc. authorizing a credit of$3,260, and a time extension of 79 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $357,450.49; and (2) Accept Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Change Order No. 2 includes one item of deleted work and a time extension to Job No. J-57. There are no errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $50 per day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date April 27, 1998 Original Contract Completion Dale January 21, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date May 14, 1999 Actual Completion Date May 14, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $354,341.49 Previously Authorized Changes 6,369.00 This Change (Delete) (3,260.00) Change Orders to Date 3,109.00 Percentage Increase 0.88% Amended Contract Price $357,450.49 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CIP, Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities, Item 2c) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) R�: wove Pagel ADDITIONAL INFORMATION , Job No. J-57, Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, includes installation of new fire alarm equipment in the Administration Building, Control Center, Operations Center, Laboratory, Human Resources Building and other buildings with network connectivity and integration into the security system. Lee and Ro prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to First Fire Systems on February 24, 1998. The contract is complete. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Delete Security System Integration $ 3 260 0 Design Change 2 Additional Contract Time For 79 Other Software Delays TOTAL— Change Order No. 2 $3,260 79 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no rework or consultant reimbursement associated with this change order. Software delays are a result of the manufacturer, Edwards System Technology's (EST), delays in getting the latest software version into the market. All of the equipment and software on the project is manufactured by EST and provided by the Contractor in accordance with a pre-purchase agreement entered into by the District and EST prior to the bid. At the time of the bid, the latest version of the software was to be available by late1998. This would allow for a timely completion of the project. As time progressed, the delivery date for the software was extended. Staff and Contractor agreed to delay the completion of the project and wait for the new software. The District did this in order to save reprogramming costs once the new version is available. The latest version adds significant functionality, as well as reduced administration time and system diagnostics. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA requirements. A notice of exemption was filed on March 17, 1993. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Change Order Status Report Change Order DF:Ic G:NiglobaKAgenda Draft ReportSTDCU-57 COA AR.dot R.n..a aaoso Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADES JOB NO. J-57 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECWTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - $ 828 $ 828 $ 828 $ 828 $ 828 100% Design Staff $ 1540 $ 13,321 $ 13,321 $ 13,321 Is 13,321 $ 13,321 100% Consultant PSA is - $ $ $ $ 0% Construction Contract $ 335,000 $ 360,710 $ 360.710 $ 360710 $ 3,260 $ 357,450,49 $ 357257 100% Construction Other ' $ 133,000 $ 166,383 $ 166,383 $ 166,383 $ 166.383 $ 151,176 91% Construction Staff" $ 37,460 $ 108,758 $ 108,758 $ 108,758 $ 100,758 $ 88.977 82% Conlin enc $ - $ $ $ $ - $ 0% TOTAL 1 $ 507.000 $ 650,000 $ - $ 650,000 1 $ 650,000 $ (3,260)1 $ 646,740 1 $ 611,559 1 95% Note-"Construction(Other)"category includes costs within budget designated for Information Technology to install Fiber Optic network backbone. Note-"Construction Staff category includes all costs not specifically associated with other categories(e.g. training, legal fees, testing contractor's, etc.) h:Mp.d W%enggebs..¢57WudgenCO 2 Budget Table.Ns Form Revised 1W171ea CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades Job No. J-57 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 2/24/1998 $ 354,314.49 $ 354.341.49 0.00 270 270 CO NO. 1 5/26/1999 $ 6.369.00 $ 360.710.49 1.80 35 305 CO NO. 2 Pending $ (3,260.00) $ 357,450.49 (0.88) 79 384 hAwp.dta%eng%jobs..1j-571C0 Status Report.xis �0 Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. First Fire Systems, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57 Consultant: Lee and Ro Engineers Amount of this Change Order~(Deduct) ($3.260.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — DELETE SECURITY SYSTEM INTEGRATION This change order item deletes the work, including labor, materials, equipment and services, for programming and integration of the new EST3 Fire Alarm System with the CASI-Rusco existing security system interface. This work is described in Detailed Specification 64-0304 and identified in the Construction Agreement as Item No. 28 in Exhibit"A", Schedule of Prices. This integration will be provided by CASI-Rusco in the future. This item was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3.260.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL CONTRACT TIME FOR SOFTWARE DELAYS This change order item adds time to the contract due to delayed delivery of the manufacturer's software revisions. All of the equipment is provided under a pre-purchase agreement between the District and the manufacturer. At the time of bid, the manufacturer stated the latest version of the software would be available in late-1998, which would allow for a timely completion of the project. In January 1999 it became apparent that the software was not going to be made available according to schedule. Staff, together with the Contractor, decided to delay the completion in order to implement the project with the newer software. The District did this in an effort to save staff time to reprogram the system at a later date. This item is a time extension only and negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 64 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 79 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($ 3,260.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 79 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. First Fire Systems, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Uporades. Job No. J-57 Consultant: Lee and Ro Enoineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 79 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 27, 1998 Original Contract Time: 270 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 21, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 79 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 114 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 384 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 14, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: May 14, 1999 Original Contract Price $ 354,341.49 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 6,369.00 This Change (Deduct) $ (3,260.00) Amended Contract Price $ 357.450A9 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: First Fire Systems, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57 Consultant: Lee and Ro Engineers Board Authorization Dale: September 22, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: First Fire Systems, Inc. Contractor Date H kwp.cta\engUOBS 8 CONTRACTSU-57\CO2.doc PDCCOMMITTEE neetmgDx ToBd.OUX- 912M 9,22/99 AGENDA REPORT IWM Number Item Number PDC99-41 13(e) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Specialist SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER TO IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, AND CITY OF LA HABRA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE AT IMPERIAL HIGHWAY/IDAHO STREET INTERSECTION, PROJECT NO. 2-R-97 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company authorizing an addition of$85,191 and 26 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $5,269,546, and (2)Approve a budget increase of$42,196 to Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, for a total revised project budget of$6,386,196. SUMMARY Change Order No. 8 includes seven items of added work to Contract No. 3-38-3. Items 2 and 6 are design changes and Items 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7 are changed conditions. There are 26 days time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The budget for this project is increased from $6,344,000 to $6,386,196 to provide additional funds for this change order. Contract Start Date October 1, 1997 Original Contract Completion Date November 24, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 8 Current Contract Completion Date March 9, 1999 Actual Completion Date June 9, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 92 Liquidated Damages Assessment $69,000 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $4,587,000 Previous Authorized Change $ 597,355 This Change Order (add) $ 85,191 Change Orders to Date $ 682,546 Percentage Increase 14.88% Amended Contract Price $5,269,546 HMp.IXabpw-0a MAp Pepsr %IM6v Ige "R@px mtxelda e,„,a, 1. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. , ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The cost for this construction contract task has overrun the current budget. Funds for this cost overrun are being provided by remaining contingency funds and by the request for an addition of$42,196 for the project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 3-38-3, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, and Project No. 2-R-97, City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn Lane at Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, consists of constructing a new trunk sewer with manholes in Imperial Highway from Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard. The new sewer varies in size from 24-inches to 39-inches. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The construction contract was awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction, Inc. in August 1997. The job is 100% complete. The following table summarizes the change order: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Undisclosed Utilities $ 6,563.00 3 Changed Condition 2 Modify Lateral MH Conn. $ 4,260.00 2 Design Change 3 Maintain Target Store Access $ 15,250.00 6 Changed Condition 4 Additional Work $ 13,515.00 5 Changed Condition 5 Undisclosed Encasement $ 14,000.00 1 Changed Condition 6 City of La Habra Changes $ 23,815.00 9 Design Change 7 Install Traffic Sig. Loos $ 7,788.00 0 Changed Condition Total $85,191.00 26 These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS N/A G NIpbNNpxMa Pall Repp4+^pR'118.'1C09I.R Ox RaxaN + Page 2 ATTACHMENTS ✓ Change Order Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report SK:Ic cwmrca.a,wpm.raama.onn wo��onxxawan.ae R. ,� Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer, et al Contract 3-38-3, et al ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET(t) INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Pro)ecl Development $ $ Design Staff $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 125.000 1 $ 125.000 $ 105.000 $ 105.000 $ 104,000 99% Construction Contract 1 $ 3.000,000 $ 5,184,355 $ 85,191 $ 5,269,546 $ 5,184.355 $ 85191 $ 5.269.546 $ 5.183,843 98% Construction Other $ $ Construction Staff $ 200,000 $ 941.650 $ 941,650 $ 941.650 $ 941,650 $ 912.058 100% Contingency $ 42,995 S 42995 E 8 TOTAL $ 3,250,000 1 $ 6,344,000 $ 42,196 $ 6,386,196 $ 6,281,005 $ 85,191 $ 6,366,196 $ 6,249,901 98% (1) The contraction contract budget includes $330,856 for Project No. 2-R-97 which will be reimbursed by the City of La Habra h:Wp.ftWng1t msWudgM WWe Form Revised 1V1 7198 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Contract No. 3-38-3, et al APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS( (DAYS) CONTRACT 1011/97 $ 4,587,000 S 4,587,000 0.00% 420 420 CO NO. 1• 3/19/98 $ 46,831 $ 4,633,831 1.02% 0 420 CO NO. 2• 4/21198 $ 35,562 $ 4,669,393 1.80% 7 427 CO NO. 3•• 6/24/98 $ 49,488 $ 4,718,881 2.88% 0 427 CO NO.4 8127/98 $ 353,988 $ 5,072,869 10.59% 46 473 CO NO. 5•• 1018/98 $ 39,889 $ 5,112,758 11.46% 9 482 CO NO. 6• 10/10/98 $ - $ 5,112,758 0.00% 0 482 CO NO. 7 5/26/99 $ 71,597 $ 5,184,355 13.02% 17 499 CO N08 Pending $ 115,191 $ 5,269,546 14.88% 26 525 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 ••Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 &3 :co hngste w Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: September 22. 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3, And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Riaht- Tum Lane At The Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $85.191.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES This item is for providing labor, equipment and materials to make repairs to and compensate the Contractor for delays encountered for the following unmarked utilities: • A 3-inch electrical conduit at Station 253+40 damaged during excavation delayed pipe laying until repairs to the conduit could be made. • A 10-inch concrete pipe crossing the trench at Station 261+35 delayed shoring installation while the Contractor investigated whether the pipe could be removed. • A 6-inch waterline crossing the trench at Station 263+63 delayed the pipe installation. The Contractor was directed to provide support for the pipe. • A 10-inch tar wrapped steel pipe was found which delayed the pipe installation. The pipe was hot tapped to determine ils content. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-30) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,563.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - MODIFICATION OF LATERAL MANHOLE CONNECTION This item compensates the Contractor for providing labor, equipment, and materials to modify the existing 48-inch manhole located to the right of Station 264+75. This eliminated a planned 48- inch I.D. manhole that would have severely impacted a local business. The modification resulted in reducing two bid items by$9,218 for a net credit of$4,958. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-23) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,260.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: September 22. 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3. And City of La Habra Street improvements For An Eastbound Right- Turn Lane At The Imperial Hiahwavlldaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97 ITEM 3- MAINTAIN ACCESS TO TARGET STORE BEYOND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS DURING THE HOLIDAYS This item is to compensate the contractor for maintaining the three driveway entrances for customer access to Target Store, thereby reducing the impact of construction during the Christmas holidays. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-31) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,250.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days ITEM 4 -ADDITIONAL WORK NOT COVERED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS This item compensates the Contractor for additional work performed and delays due to changed conditions. Included are; • While installing the bore pit at Station 254+40, an adjacent light standard was in jeopardy of being damaged due to the close proximity of the shoring piles. The Contractor was directed to remove, store and reinstall the light standard after completion of the bore. • Pour one-sack slurry to support sewer lateral at Station 260+88. • In the vicinity of Station 265+60, backfill material over the adjacent Imperial Trunk Sewer was poorly consolidated and caved into the Miller-Holder sewer trench. This caused considerable delay in the installation of the beam and plate shoring on the north side of the trench. • Provide and install an adapter coupling from an 8-inch steel pipe to the 8-inch VCP on an existing drop manhole at Station 180+22. • Provide for the removal of a concrete encasement at Station 201+00 not shown on the plans and the resulting delay. • Install stop logs at manhole Station 159+97 which was not a part of this contract, but was done under the direction of District personnel. • Provide assistance to the City of La Habra maintenance crew after they damaged the Contractors bypass set-up at manhole Station 188+92. Work involved retrieving sewer line plug, resetting the plug, and temporary bypass pumping upstream until the plug reset. This will be back charged to the City. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FC03383-32) Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1015" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3 And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Right- Turn Lane At The Imperial Hinhwav/Idaho Street Intersection, Proiect No. 2-R-97 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,515.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF UTILITY ENCASEMENT The Contractor found a utility encased in concrete located over the new 21-inch sewer line at Station 266+20. The plans show no concrete encasement and utilities 4-feet east of the sewer. The item is to compensate the Contractor for the delay and the removal of interfering concrete and the replacement of the concrete encasement. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 9-6(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-33) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days ITEM 6- CITY OF LA HABRA APPROVED FIELD CHANGE ORDERS This item is to compensate the Contractor for additional labor, equipment, and materials to perform work for a design change, pertaining to the plans prepared by the City for Project No. 2-R-97, and will be back charged to the City • Remove concrete overburden at catch basin in SE Quadrant of Idaho/imperial and abandoned concrete traffic pole pedestal in the SW quadrant of Idaho/Imperial. Relocate new traffic pole from planned location and install new pedestrian crossing push-button post. • Place extra striping for traffic detour on Idaho north of Imperial. • Furnish and apply color coating material on the concrete retaining wall and retaining curb parallel to the right turn pocket. • To make corrections in the cross gutter drainage on Idaho Street, additional asphalt grinding and clean-up, which extended the work day and delayed the completion of the surface paving. • Install additional conduit and pull box connection and coordinate with Edison for traffic signal shutdown to complete installation on Idaho. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-25, 28, 34, and 35) v Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3. And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Riaht- Tum Lane At The Imperial HighwaylIdaho Street Intersection Project No. 2-R-97 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,815.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days ITEM 7 - INSTALL ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LOOPS This item compensates the Contractor for installing additional traffic loops from Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard that were not shown in the Contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's farce account pursuant to Section ID-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,788.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Day TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $85,191.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 26 Calendar Days `a Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: September 22, 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3, And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound MOM- Turn Lane At The Imperial HighwaylIdaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97 The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 26 day time extension is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: October 1, 1997 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 24, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 26 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 105 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 525 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 9, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 92 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: June 9, 1999 Original Contract Price $4,587,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 597,355.00 This Change Changes (Add) $ 85,191.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,269,546.00 u Page 6 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: September22. 1999 Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract No. 3-38-3. And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Right- Turn Lane At The Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97 Board Approval Date: September 22, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meed,, Me ToBd.aDr. 9-z-99 B-zz-99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC99-42 I3(r) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$27,687 increasing the total project budget to $4,259,687, and (2) Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, providing for additional construction support services, for an additional amount of$27,687, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $515,632. SUMMARY The Professional Service Agreement (PSA) between Boyle Engineering and the District includes consultant support services to District staff during the construction phase of this contract. The completion of this contract has been delayed by electrical changes, additional work associated with the installation of an underground fuel tank, and pump vibration and cavitation problems. These delays have extended the time period for consultant construction support services. As a result, additional funds in the projected amount of$27,687 are required to provide for consultation and advice from Boyle Engineering to the District to complete the project. Additionally, a budget increase of$27,687 is requested to cover Addendum No. 5. Staff projections indicate budget funds will be insufficient at contract completion. An additional budget increase will be requested in a future change order for staff labor and overhead costs associated with the project delays, and to cover change order work. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table, BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line Item:Zone 7, Item b; Zone 14, Item a) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total agreement amount shown in the Professional Services Agreement Status Report provides services for the previous Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations Project, Project No. 7-14, and the subject project. Project No. 7-14 is complete. The proposed Consultant PSA budget shown on the Budget Information Table is for services provided on this project only. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project adds a permanent generator building and outfits the second half of the Main Street Pump Station with five new pumps and motors and two variable frequency drives (VFDs). The existing side of the station will receive two new VFDs. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The construction contract was awarded to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. on April 23, 1997. The contract is 97% complete. The original agreement between Boyle Engineering and the District, dated February 14, 1990, was in the amount of$216,168. Four addenda have been added since, increasing the total amount to $487,945. Three of these four addenda were added during the design phase, and one was added at the beginning of construction. The original completion date of the construction contract was June 27, 1998. The contract has been delayed, with completion projected to be September 30, 1999. The majority of the delays can be attributed to electrical changes, unforeseen permit requirements associated with the installation of an underground fuel tank, and resolution of pump vibration and cavitation problems. The District has been utilizing Boyle Engineering for consultation and advice during the construction phase. Additional funds in the amount of$27,687 are required to continue to receive Boyle's services until the projected contract completion date. This amount will compensate Boyle Engineering for additional consultation and advice to the District during the final phase of construction, witnessing of final testing, and preparation of record drawings. The requested budget increase of$27,687 will provide funds for Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Service Agreement with Boyle Engineering. At this time, 94% of the current budget has been expended. Staff projections place budget expenditures at 107% of the current budget at the expected contract completion date of September 30, 1999. The majority of these additional costs will cover electrical change orders with associated delays. Other additional costs stem from smaller changes including work on existing valves and the installation of corrosion protection for existing force mains. Additional staff labor, overtime, and associated overhead costs are required for District's construction management efforts during the extended contract period. An additional budget increase will be requested in a future change order to provide for projected additional funds needed to complete the contract. ALTERNATIVE None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1998 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 30, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table PSA Status Report MB:Ic G intglobaRAgenda Draft ReportsTMAR 7.7.1 Aeeentlum No.5 to PSA and Budget Incnamdoc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1 a� i;; i n ORI¢INAL ,') CURRENT "PROPOSED PROP056 FUNDS - THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROFICT/TASK- RUTHORIZEO• �PROJECT,-; t-BUDGET REVISED I- AUTHORREDTO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED s BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION?* TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Stag $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ - $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83.000 1 100% Consultant PSA $ 212,000 $ 360,351 $ 27.687 $ 388,038 ' $ 360,351 $ 27,887 $ 388,038 $ 360,251 93% Construction Contract $ 690.000 $ 2,656,974 $ - $ 2.656,974 - $ 2.656,974 $ - $ 2,656,974 $ 2,473,731 93% Construction(Other) $ $ Construction Staff $ 265.000 $ 1.131,675 $ - $ 1,131,675 $ 1,131,675 $ - $ 1,131.675 $ 1,076,380 95% Contingency $ - $ - $ $ TOTAL $ 1,250,000 $ 4,232,000 $ 27,687 $ 4.259,687 $ 4,232,000 $ 27,687 1 $ 4.259,687 $ 3,993.362 1 94% 'Does not include amount for Project 7-14 which is included in original PSA Budget Into TaareM AR For ADD No.s To PSAwW Budge M eu, Form Re dsud lWiMS Professional Services Agreement Status Report Contract No. 7-7-1 Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Total Project Budget: $ 4,232,000' Consultant: Boyle Engineering Start Date of Project: February 14, 1990 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 2/14/90 Original PSA Design of Improvements to Main Street Pump $ 216,168 $ 216,168 Station 2/8/95 1 Design of New Code And Other Technical $ 99,420 $ 315,588 Requirements 5/22/96 2 Reconfiguration of Generator Building to Fit $ 24,710 $ 340,298 Existing Site Reconfiguration of Lay-Out And Design of New $ 23,700 $ 363,998 4/24/97 3 Discharge Header Piping 7/30/97 4 Construction Support Services $ 123,947 1 $487,945 Pending 5 Additional Construction Support Services $ 27,687 $ 515,632 1, Current Budget for Project 7-7-1. 2. Professional Services for both Project No.7.7-1 and Project No.7.14, Project 7-14 is cornplete. Wadon\datal\wp.dtawngVOBS&CONTRACTSV-74 Won CO Agenda RepodsV-7-1 Addendum 5 to PSA Status Repoft doc 08/19/99 Revised 05114/98 PDC COMMITTEE MeetlngUzte Toad.otDir. 9/1/99 9/27/99 AGENDA REPORT tNm Number Irem NumWr PDC99-43 13(c) Orange County Sanitabon District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jeff Shubik, Project Manager SUBJECT: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM STUDIES, JOB NO. J-25A GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Electrical Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$91,848, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,077,376. SUMMARY In July 1998, the original Professional Services Agreement (PSA) was awarded to Carollo Engineers, P.C. to identify and analyze problems in the existing electrical distribution systems at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, and to recommend cost-effective solutions. The scope of work required the Consultant to obtain electrical equipment information from OCSD. This information is to be entered and maintained in an electrical equipment database that the Consultant is developing for the project. In gathering this data, it has been determined that certain electrical equipment information is not readily available from existing sources. Additional information needs to be collected in the field to perform the analysis of the electrical distribution system required in this contract. The proposed Addendum No. 2 to the existing PSA will provide for the additional data collection. The proposed Addendum No. 2 will also modify the J-25-4 database to allow the use of equipment lag numbers. This feature is required to make the database consistent with the new lag numbering system being developed in Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention and Automation Project. Staff recommends that Carollo Engineers, P.C. be authorized to perform the necessary additional services in Addendum No. 2. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed Addendum No. 2 amount will not exceed $91,848. The total contract price for professional services of this project will not exceed $2,077,376. \NtlmWYlY.ypeVYnd•�W R.� 13W1�1 a.H..e. ermae Page 1 The attached Budget Information Table reflects the re-allocation of available contingency funds. The total project budget of$3,171,000 remains unchanged. Costs for design and construction projects that will result from J-25-4 recommendations have not been budgeted because they are unknown at this time. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (F'ss-oo Budget, section a, page 204, Project J-25-4) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In July 1998, the original Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for professional services was awarded to Carollo Engineers, P.C. to identify and analyze problems in the existing electrical distribution systems at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, and to recommend cost-effective solutions. To analyze the systems, Carollo is to build a system model and perform calculations. The electrical equipment information for the model is collected from existing OCSD sources and entered in a database that the Consultant is developing for the project. This J-254 database is intended for long-term use by OCSD staff. In January 1999, the General Manager approved Addendum No. 1 to the existing agreement, in the amount of$9,577, to enhance the J-254 database requirements. The enhancement provided: - Eliminating constraints caused by the database set-up on system stability analysis in Job No. J-33-3, Power Monitoring and Control Systems - Cheaper database management due to quicker navigation within the database and quicker data entry - Less training required for OCSD staff and Consultants The proposed Addendum No. 2 includes two tasks: 1. Additional Field Data Collection The results of Consultant's search for equipment information from existing sources have helped Staff determine that certain data is not available. The missing information has to be collected in the field to complete the analysis. 2. Equipment Database Enhancement The enhancement will allow users to search the J-254 database using equipment tag numbers. This is necessary to make the database suitable for the upcoming OCSD transition to the new tag numbering system being developed in Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention and Automation Project. G NtDineaMenda o,.n RamftP 6U 254U 25 Md 2AR MM do Re . � Page 2 Staff has negotiated with the Consultant the addendum scope, cost and schedule. The overall project schedule will be extended by two months, with completion by August 2000. Staff recommends that Carollo Engineers, P.C. be authorized to perform the necessary additional services in Addendum No. 2 for an amount not to exceed $91,848. The total contract price for professional services of this project will not exceed $2,077,376. ALTERNATIVES No cost-effective alternatives to the additional data collection and database enhancement are available. Delays in authorization of Addendum No. 2 will render the project database invalid and incompatible with the new tagging system. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report JS:jak:gc 0 M9bMNQe 0. ft R�2 b 2.Vt 6�Ad.M Revue, eaose Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Electrical Power System Studies Job No. J-25-4 ORIGINAL,: `CURRENT PROPOSED ' PROPOSED : .FUNDS ' " - +>,'' THIS 1" PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED LyF,JtOJECT AUTHORIZED PROJECT: BUDGET,� • REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE 'EXPENDED +' . " BIi111,° ,BUDGET;? INCREASE BUDGET- TO DATE ' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE , TO DATE(%) x< Proect Development $ 145000 $ 145,000 $ - $ 145,000 $ 145,000 $ - $ 145,000 $ 108,000 74% Design Staff $ 615,000 $ 402,348 $ 402,348 $ 402.348 $ - $ 402.348 $ 98,000 24% Consultant PSA $ 1,500 000 $ 1.985,528 $ 91.848 $ 2,077,376 $ 1.985,528 $ 91,848 $ 2,077,376 $ 730,000 35% Construction Contract Construction Other $ 5,900 $ - $ 5,900 $ 5,900 $ - $ 5,900 $ 5,900 100% Construction Staff ConUngency $ 632,224 $ 91,848 $ 540,378 1 $ 632,224 $ 91,848 $ 540,376 $ 0% TOTAL $ 2,260,000 $ 3,171,000 1 $ - 1 $ 3.171,000 $ 3,171,000 1 $ $ 3,171,000 1$ 941,900 30% D:NiplobeaAWau DWI Repons%PDCU-25 11 254ADD 02 Bu4pe1 Teble-v2.x1slD1sldc1e Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-25-4 Electrical Power System Studies Total Project Budget: $3,171,000.00 Consultant: Carollo Engineers, P.C. Start Date of Project: August 1, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/22/98 Original PSA Electrical Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4 $1 975,951.00 $1,975,951.00 01/25/99 Addendum, Electrical Equipment Database Enhancement $9,577.26 $1,985,528.26 pending Addendum 2 Additional Electrical Equipment Data Collection $91,848.00 $2,007,376.26 The General Manager approved Addendum No. 1 in January 1999. Reference "Additional Information" in this Agenda Report. JS:js G.Wglobal%genda Draft RepoftTDCV-254PSA Status Repon-v2.doc 08/12/99 Revlssed OW14198 s Y� t DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, September 8, 1999, 5 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on July 14, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Don Hughes Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler Shawn Boyd Daniel Cozad, SAWPA Representative John M. Gullixson Shirley McCracken STAFF PRESENT: Mark A. Murphy Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John J. Collins, Past Board Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Mike Peternan, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Directors Absent: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Jan Debay, Board Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations 8 Maintenance James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor John Swindler, IT Manager Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEN No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. e e Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting t Page 2 September 8, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the July 14, 1999 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting, as drafted. Director Gullixson abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Blake Anderson provided an update on the beach closure and ongoing activities. A report will be prepared for the Board that addresses both the cost accounting and technical issues, along with recommendations. Mr. Anderson also reported that OCIP member agencies are vigorously opposing the payment of additional fees to the County of Orange litigation firm. Proceeds should be distributed in October. a. Presentation on SAWPA Governance and Water Bond Issue. Daniel Cozad, SAWPA representative, described the existing SAWPA governance structure and proposed alternatives to more clearly represent the various agencies and stakeholders in issues impacting the Santa Ana River watershed. He also described the projects included in the water bond that, if passed by the State legislators, will be presented to the voters next year. The Directors expressed concern about having agreements in place with the various recipients to ensure that the identified funding is forwarded by SAWPA. The issue of representation will be discussed by the Steering Committee. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that property tax and user fee revenues to be received from the County exceed the amounts estimated in the budget. He also reported on the status of the 176 requests from Yorba Linda residents for refunds or credits. There were also 10 requests from residents in other areas of the County. A discussion followed on reconsidering the Board decision at a future meeting. Mr. Streed said that the last account with the County Treasurer has been closed. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 September 8, 1999 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications had no report. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-e) a. FAHR99-63: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of August 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. b. FAHR99-64: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of August 17, 1999. C. FAHR99-65: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the Period April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. d. FAHR99-66: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. e. FAHR99-67: Receive and file FY 1998/99 End of Year Operational Report. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(a) through 12(e) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. FAHR99-57: The Delegation of Authority Resolution was pulled from the agenda at the request of staff. b. FAHR99.68: Update on FIS Implementation and Completion Mike White gave a brief report on the history of the project. After discussion, the members approved the recommendation to close out the project. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to accept the J. D. Edwards Financial Information System and close project#5401200. Director Mark Murphy abstained because of a possible conflict of interest. C. FAHR99-69: Approve 401(a) Plan Maximum Contribution. The General Manager explained that the action pertains only to the General Manager's contract. There is no additional cost to the District. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 September 8, 1999 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve 401(a) Plan Maximum Contribution. d. FAHR99-70: Approval of consultant contract with retired employee Gerald Jones re Planning and Implementation of DART Re-engineering Program. Director of Human Resources Mike Peterman explained that the DART reinvention process is in the implementation stage and Mr. Jones' expertise and experience is critical to the success of the program in terms of continuity and vision. No decision has been made on filling the vacant position at this time. The ordinance allows the FAHR Committee to waive the requirement that restricts employing retired employees for one year. Staff was directed to include a statement in the contract that only actual travel expenses would be reimbursed. Director Collins asked that the language in the ordinance be revised to remove reference to the"Joint Chairman." Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve consultant contract with retired employee Gerald Jones re Planning and Implementation of DART Re- engineering Program. Director Swan opposed. (14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR99-61: Data Warehouse Demonstration Information Technology Manager John Swindler demonstrated the data warehouse and how information is collected and retrieved. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no supplemental agenda items. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Director Gullixson asked that the credit and refund of user fees policy be reconsidered at a future meeting, and that General Counsel provide the statutes that limit refunds beyond four years. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for October 13, 1999 at 5 p.m. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 September 8, 1999 (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 19(A)(1) and (2) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. At 7 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:02 p.m. Submitted by: �lon Tappan V ling FAHR Committee Secretary N MO��^�^�SKA�'�mB4G FPNF MW Js FAHIR COMMITTEE n«nn9oate ToX.ads, 09/09/99 09/22/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Nym r & Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the Liquid Operating Monies and the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolios. Sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The District's portfolios contain no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H 1Wp.ftTn 1W AkTr@seFapoMPME R.mrra. ,d,TM7 Page 1 R ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of August 1999 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts Aug.31, 1999 Yield(14) State of Calif.LAIF $ 5,238,008 5.3 Union Bank Checking Account 545,719 — Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 301,000 4.4 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18,969.365 4.5 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 289.886,766 4.6 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 10.810 4.9 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,195.839 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 — TOTAL $347.151,907 ALTERNATIVES None. CEOA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Portfolio Detail Transaction Report GGS:SK:lc H.M MCVM3I4 Vr aaveepolN, M.Y R.m IWI?W Paget ReportMonthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances 11 0 111 i�i�i�i�i� i���i�i�i i�i�00i �i�i�i�i •���•�•��� i�i0����� i�0000 !�JOOJ i�i�i�i�i� i•0000 'i'i•:':' ':':':':' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !i�.�i�i�� !�•�•�.i•1 1����i���i •�.�.�.i.� !i�i�.�i�1 !.�i�i�i�i D. u LAW OBankAccts M Petty Cash GI Dist 11 GO Bond Fund G:\excel.dta\finx2220\geggi\Finance\monthly treasurers report MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1999) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: Met ,t $18,973,706 MellonO $18,969,365 .Irstorical PIMCOost: $19,055,052 • Mellon $19,055,069 15.11 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.24 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $44,160 15.IA REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 00/0 15.15 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 50% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.39 0.40 3 Months: 1.24 1.16 12 Months: 5.10 4.65 Year-to-Date: 3.23 3.04 H.t..IELNANCEU10WOZAF MVLELIQ0809 UT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1999) Long-Term Operating Monies (203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: pp��M� $290,426,401 Mellon0 $289,886,766 Historical Cost: $295,998,155 • PIMCO $296,330,392 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.40 Of Index: 2.39 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $7,049,669 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 22% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" See Note 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: I Month: 0.15 0.20 3 Months: 0.43 0.60 12 Months: 3.21 3.30 Year-to-Date: 0.75 0.95 HA..(FINANCE@101KOZ4KISAMPLEL-7O899.KPT NOTE: On July 30, 1999,$13 million was withdrawn to fund the District's semi-annual debt services payments. Consistent with the District's policy of preservation of principal,PIMCO liquidated Commercial Paper and U.S.Treasury Notes for the withdrawal. Medium-term Corporate Notes were not liquidated to ensure preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. As a result,the portfolio contained 31.9%in medium-umn Corporate Notes; 1.90/9above the diversification IimiL PIMCO has undertaken appropriate steps to restore proper sector diversification. Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' -I BASE- USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-AUG-1999 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,653,904.00 2,653,904.00 13.92% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THN IYR 3,411,181.67 3,411,181.67 17.76% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,440,218.06 2,440,219.06 12.71% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS TIIN IYR 896,476.50 896,476.50 4.67% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 116,792.32 116,792.32 0.61% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,519,572.55 9,518,572.55 49.57% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 8,5 49.57°e 016 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 4,698,304.60 4,683,916.00 24.39% -14,389.60 BANKING&FINANCE 3,463,239.30 3,413,213.00 17.77% .50,026.30 INDUSTRIAL 963,753.00 851,853.00 4.44% -11,900.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 511,200.00 501,810.00 2.61% -9,390.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,536,496.90 9,450,792.00 49.21% .85,704.90 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES �7,53 , 1�U.99,450,792.00i31i% 5, 6d.95 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 234.426.98 234,426.98 1,22% 0.00 TOTAL 234,426.98 234,426.98 1.22% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS "9 234,426.9i 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,289,4%.43 19,203,791.53 100.00% -85,704.90 07Sep-1999 15:44:44 &ecudw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-1999 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 79,650.00 79,650.00 0.03% 0.00 PAYABLES -27,612,753.13 -27,612.753.13 -9.42% 0.00 TOTAL -27,533,103.13 -27,533,103.13 -9.39% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 28,283,131.89 28,283,131.89 9.65% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 691,400.77 691,400.77 0.24% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 29,974,532.66 28,974,532.66 9.88% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,441,429.53 1,441,429.53 0.49% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 61,157,053.38 59,113,936.03 20.16% -2,043,117.35 U.S.AGENCIES 110,749,363.71 109,328,318.21 36.95% -2,421,045.50 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 5,658,203.13 5,720,687.50 1.95% 62,484.37 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,047,396.48 3,992,335.92 1.36% -55,060.56 FHLMC POOLS 10,039,541.95 9,874,016.16 3.37% ,165,525.79 FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,202,994.40 6,075,858.05 2.07% -127,136.35 FNMA POOLS 712,206.25 712,206.25 0.24% 0.00 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 113,572.62 113,536.29 0.04% -36.33 ADS:HOME EQUITY 500, 00.00 499,215.00 0.17% -785.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 987,620.00 0.34% -12,380.00 BANKING&FINANCE 68,030,156.85 67,652,641.20 23.08% -377,515.65 INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 16,048,085.75 5A7% -981,883.25 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,931,580.00 0.66% -219,670.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,395,300.00 2.52% -101,955.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 294,888,962.77 288,445,336.36 98.39% -6,443,626.41 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2 .77 288,445,336.3 98.39% OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 07-Sep-1999 13:46:37 Executive Workbench Q I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-1999 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,292,948.69 3,29Z948.69 1.12% 0.00 TOTAL 3,292,948.69 3,292,948.69 1.12% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,292,948.69 1.12% —.Ia NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 299,623}40.99 293,179,714.58 100.00% -C443,626.41 07-Sep-1999 15:46:37 Exec.f1w Workbench o Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAG`E.I . I BASE.' USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-1999 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 79,650.00 79,650.00 0.03% 0.00 PAYABLES -27,612,753.13 -27,612,753.13 -9.42% 0.00 TOTAL .27,533,103.13 -27,533,103.13 -9.39% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 28,283,131.89 29,283,131.89 9.65% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 691,400.77 691,400.77 0.24% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 28,974,532.66 28,974,532.66 9.88% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,441,429.53 1,441,429.53 0.49% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 61,157,053.38 59,113,936.03 20.16% -2,043,117.35 U.S.AGENCIES 110,749,363.71 108,328,318.21 36.95% -2,421,045.50 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 5,658,203.13 5,720,687.50 1.95% 62,484.37 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,047,396.48 3,992,335.92 1.36% -55,060.56 FHLMC POOLS 10,039,541.95 9,874,016.16 3.37% -165,525.79 FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,202,994.40 6,075,858.05 2.07^A -127,136.35 FNMA POOLS 712,206.25 712,206.25 0,24% 0.00 ASSETBACKED SECURITIES 113.572.62 113,536.29 0.04% -36.33 ABS:HOME EQUITY 500,000.00 499,215.00 0.17% -785.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 987,620.00 0.34% -12,380.00 BANKING&FINANCE 68,030,156.85 67,65Z641.20 23.08% -377,515.65 INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 16,048,085.75 5.47% -981,883.25 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,931,580.00 0.66% -219,670.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,395,300.00 2.52% -101,955.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 294,888,962.77 288,445,336.36 98.39% -6,443,626.41 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 294JM,962.77 298,44V36.36 98.39% 44J, OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 07Sep-1999 15:46.37 &c wiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-1999 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,292,948.69 3,292,948.69 1.12% 0.00 TOTAL 3,292,948.69 3,292,948.69 1.12% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,292,948.69 3,292,948.69 1.121/6 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 299,623,340.99 293,179,714.58 100.00% -6,443,626.41 07Sep-1999 15:46.37 Eeecullee Wa kbewh YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 1999/08/31 RUN DATE t 09/02/99 DISTRICT. LIOUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.57.29 .....vm..vvv=vvvv= v..vm.......mm...0.....v===.===v=mmm=save=m..... PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY RAMAT TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOON YIELD RATING PRICE RAREST VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ _______ ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 116,792.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 5.110 AAA I00.000 116,792.32 1.22 996095247 AAA 116.792.32 .12 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL DONE LN MID CORP DISC 4.846 .000 P-1 93.609 2,440,218.06 25.63 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 A-1♦ 2,440,218.06 12.06 500,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 4.901 .000 P-1 93.933 051.400.00 9.25 61166BWO 09/23/1999 881.400.00 4.65 900,000.00 GOLONAN SACHS LP DISC 4.940 .000 P-1 97.S63 93B4O69.00 9.22 38142UY30 11/03/1999 878,069.00 4.63 3,500,000.00 U B TREASURY BILLS 5.094 .000 P-1 92.462 3,411,101.67 35.83 912395DE4 03/02/2000 OD 03/04/99 A-lf 3,411,181.67 13.98 900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 5.241 .000 P-1 99.609 896,476.50 9.41 313588LY9 MAT 09/20/1999 A-1R 896,476.50 4.23 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.333 .000 P-1 99.382 094,435.00 9.39 36959SX65 10/04/1999 894,435.00 4.32 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.854 .116 9,518.572.55 100.00 9,510,572.55 50.19 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL DOW LN STG CORP OEM .000 4.703 AAA 99.953 999.200.00 10.59 3134A3RT5 MID AT 05/19/2000 DO 05/10/99 AAA 999,530.00 S.27 3.300,000.00 FEDERAL DONE LN BE CONS SUN 4.060 4.855 ARA 99.528 3,699,104.60 38.98 3133M7EM2 4.935\ 01/28/2000 DD O1/28/99 AAA 3,684,366.00 11.42 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF HIG 5.001 3.931 AA3 100.362 511,200.00 5.30 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 AA- 501,B10.00 2.65 500,000.00 CHRYSLER PINL CO LLC 5.119 13.134 Al 100.861 529,010.00 5.33 131205AT4 13.250\ IO/IS/1999 A+ 504,405.00 2.61 850,000.00 PHILLIP "MIS CO INC NTS 5.259 7.1I0 A2 100.219 863.753.00 9.01 718154BX4 3.125% 12/01/1199 DO 12/01/12 A 851t851.00 4.49 YLDANAL FIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 2 OCSF03511102 1999/OB/31 RUN DATE t 09/02/19 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __-_______ 100,000.00 GENERAL NTRS ACCEP CORP NTN 5.305 6.266 A2 100.060 901,657.00 9.52 3)062N)G2 6.2508 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 A 900,612.00 6.75 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC RATS 5.363 7.621 A2 100.050 303.930.00 3.13 033902AP3 3.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/14 A 300,150.00 1.59 500.000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN NIP ISB00IIO 5.653 8.396 A3 100.760 515,125.00 5.33 893SOMEPI 8.650% 01/12/2000 DO 01/12/15 A 503.B60.00 2.66 900,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP NTN TR 00039 5.932 6.185 BRAI 100.078 901.263.30 1.53 31808CBQ6 6.1901 10/20/1991 DD 10/20/97 A- 900,702.00 6.35 300,000.00 LEBMAN RACE RIDGE NIN IR 00327 6.666 8.056 A3 101.168 306.350.00 3.21 52517PPOS 8.250% 05/15/2000 DO 10/16/90 A 303,504.00 1.60 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6.266 5.931 9,536,196.90 100.00 9,450,792.00 41.83 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.476 3.050 19.055.069.65 100.00 18,969,366.55 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 MSP09522202 1999/08/31 RUN DATE 09/02/59 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET "LOB 4 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 691,400.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOST .000 5.169 AAA 100.000 691,400.00 2.38 996095247 AAA 691,400.27 .22 2,200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 5.296 .000 P-1 99.698 2,193,352.33 0.56 34539UW99 09/05/1999 2,193,352.33 .69 12,200,000.00 SAM LEE CORP DISC 5.231 .000 P-1 99.595 12,150,562.09 41.93 8D311BWM9 09/21/1999 12,150,562.89 3.83 14,000,000.00 IBM DISC 5.233 .000 P-1 99.566 13,939,216.67 48.10 44922BMH7 09/17/2999 13,939,216.67 4.39 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.923 .300 28,974,532.66 100.00 20,974,532.61 9.13 PIKED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORD GLOBAL LIT .000 5.299 Al 99.926 1,992,000.00 .69 066365DM4 FLTG AT 05/11/2001 DO 05/11/18 A- 1,998,560.00 .63 .00 CHASE NAMHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO ll/15/95 AAA .00 .00 3,500,0D0.00 CHRYSLER PIN MTN .000 5.000 Al 99.812 3,498,635.00 1.21 17120QEBO FLTG AT 08/08/2002 DO 04/00/98 A4 3,493,420.00 1.10 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CA CO TERN ENHANCED .000 5.606 Al 95.812 1,998,613.60 .69 3453975CO FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,996,240.00 .63 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MIRE ACCEP MTN .000 5.585 A2 100.187 3,010,930.00 1.04 37042NVR9 FLTG AT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/98 A 3,005,610.00 .95 3,950,000.00 GENERAL NTRB ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.501 A2 100.103 3,910.060.50 1.33 37042SQVS PLIG AT 08/18/2003 DD 00/17/98 A 3,954,068.50 2.25 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS .000 5.454 A3 100.430 2,000,000.00 .69 423320BKO FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DO D6/35/99 A- 2,006,600.00 .63 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN ITR 00246 .000 5.220 A3 100.711 3,000,000.00 1.04 42333HLF1 FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 3,021,330.00 .95 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 4 MBF07522202 1999/08/31 RUN DATE 1 09/02/99 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 1 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY HARELY TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD RATING PRICE M XEY VALUE 0 TOTAL 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO HTN .00D 5.434 A2 100.275 4,000,000.00 1.39 44181KZAS FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO D6/24/90 A 4,011,000.00 1.26 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN HTN SR 900530 .000 5.343 A2 100.006 999,IBB.90 .34 44181KXT4 FLTG RT 00/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,000,060.00 .32 .00 STUDENT LN NXTG ASSN 1992-1 Al .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 30442GAX2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 AAA .00 .00 7,264,250.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.658 3.659 AAA 99.094 7,241,093.I7 2.49 9128273AB 3.6251 07/15/28D3 OD 07/15/97 AAA 7,198,435.90 2.23 10,490,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.324 3.529 AAA 95.625 10,211,075.00 3.40 9128232H3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AAA 10,031,159.13 3.16 0,500,000.00 V S TREASURY NOTES 4.139 6.191 AAA 100.953 9,034,223.67 2.93 9128232G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 AAA 8,581,005.00 2.30 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN KM 4.943 6.622 AAA 100.715 20,DI2,51D.OD 6.63 31364CXY7 6.630% 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 AAA 19,136,610.00 6.03 7,000,000.00 NORGAN STANLEY HTN HER 00299 5.170 5.164 RAI 99.334 6,996,129.00 2.42 61745ENLI PLTG AT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 Al 6,981,380.00 2.20 5,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.474 AAA 117.422 6,233,593.75 2.03 912810DE5 11.125% 08/25/2003 DO 07/05/83 AAA 5,831,10O.00 1.65 2,100,000.00 U R TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.303 AAA 101.141 2,167,321.15 .33 912827954 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,123,961.00 .63 900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 3.243 AAA 103.484 967,825.47 .32 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 AAA 931,356.00 .29 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY ROTES 5.402 6.190 AAA 100.56, 5,637,692.23 1.92 9128273GS 06.2501 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/93 AAA 5,553,295.00 1.35 5,200,000.DO U S TREASURY BONDS 5.610 9.814 AAA 121.000 6,690,250.00 2.18 912010WO 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/03 AAA 6,292,000.00 1.98 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.554 AA 99.192 1,543,215.00 .51 046003HY0 6.500E 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,497,580.00 .47 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.360 5.830 A3 97.822 999,730.00 .33 42333HKJO 5.750% 01/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 978,220.00 .31 YLDAMA , YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 5 OCSM7522202 1991/08/31 RUN DATE : 09/02/99 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING ROM TIME i 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ ---------------------------- _______ _______ ------- -------- ------------ __________ 3,700,000.00 V 5 TREASURY MOTES 5.783 6.396 AAA 101.625 3,810,555.70 1.30 9128232N1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 AAA 3,760,125.00 1.18 2,005,000.00 HEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MEN 5.004 6.139 A2 99.515 2,060,739.00 .66 B124000N6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 A- 1,975,225.75 .62 5,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.181 AAA 101.016 5,006,402.25 1.35 91282721,5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 AAA 5e050'BU0.00 1.59 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP RATS 5.049 6.681 A2 99.234 3,073.370.00 1.03 81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 2,972r020.00 .94 14,750,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL BIG ASSN MEN 5.882 6.290 AAA 90.281 14,560,462.50 4.64 31364GLD9 5.710% 12/15/2008 DD 12/15/99 AAA 13,390,197.50 4.22 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C HIM 5.882 5.860 "1 99.828 51996,400.00 2.09 63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/98 AA- 5,989,680.00 1.89 754,939.30 FMLHC MULTICL MYG P/C 1524 E 5.112 5.919 99.718 753,777.80 .26 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 752,710.65 .24 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ASKS MTN 5.901 5.860 AAA 99.312 14,955,300.00 5.26 31364G2V0 5.820% 07/19/2001 DD 02/19/9% AAA 14,096,800.00 4.69 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH MOTES 5.995 6.410 AA 99.455 2,526,725.00 .86 59018SKP4 6.3358 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/57 AA- 2,486,375.00 .28 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.095 AAA 98.604 7,497,255.00 2.56 039663AY5 6.000% 06/15/2002 OD 06/15/98 AAA 7,395,300.00 2.33 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP RATS 6.032 3.024 A2 100.716 1,283,862.50 .43 3704250PO 7.125% 05/01/2002 UP 05/01/99, A 1,250,950.00 .40 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MYER ACCEP CORP RPM 6.046 6.638 A2 100.328 1,018,520.00 .34 37042MKI 6.300% 04/30/2001 UP 04/25/91 A 1,003,280.00 .32 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTG CORP DEBS 6.062 6.028 AAA 99.530 14,982,750.00 S.17 3134A3EM1 6.000% 07/20/2001 DD 07/20/99 AAA 14o929,500.00 4.20 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTM 4TR 00343 6.110 6.119 A3 99.859 2,500,000.00 .86 52517PQG9 PLTG AT O7/15/2002 DD 07/12/99 A 2,496,475.00 .39 2,000,000.00 BAMKBOSION CORP SR EYE 6.133 6.203 A2 98.692 1,999,600.00 .68 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A- 1,973,440.00 .62 YLDAML YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OC6Po3522202 1999/08/31 RUN DATE , 09/02/99 DISTRICT, LUNG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME x 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT WALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE RAREST VALUE 9 TOTAL 1,000,000.00 FIRST USA BR NA RTN ISR 00002 6.164 6.186 AA2 99.009 999,100.00 .34 33744CAB1 6.125% 06/25/2001 DD 06/23/99 AA- 99D,030.00 .31 113,572.63 FIFTH THIRD BR AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.202 AAA 99.968 113,572.62 .03 31633EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 113,536.29 .04 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MN ITR 00004 6.201 6.239 A3 98.762 1,000,000.00 .34 73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB. 987,620.00 .31 500,000.00 OMEN THEN CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.210 6.30D AAA 99.843 500,000.00 .13 3935052Y3 6.290% 10/15/2013 OD 08/26/99 AAA 499,215.00 .16 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN WN 6.291 6.249 AAA 99.703 4,488,705.00 1.55 31364CRV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AM 4,406,635.00 1.41 3,444,561.18 PHLMC NULTIC4A63 CTF E3 A 6.316 6.020 AAA 90.663 3,448,328.60 1.13 3133WE95 6.3241 00/15/2032 AAA 3,398,507.40 1.03 2,000,000.00 SEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.042 A2 98.659 2,031,960.00 .68 073902ANI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 1,973,190.00 .62 5,000,000.00 LBHHAN ERGS MUCH MTN 600196 6.364 6.169 A3 99.31E 5,039,450.00 1.32 52517PJD4 6.650% 11/09/2000 DO 11/08/96 A 4,905,900.00 1.57 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.756 A2 99.914 1,317,619.35 .45 093902AW8 6.350% 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 A 1,303,833.70 .41 2,000,000.00 PHLNC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.355 AAA 96.232 2,000,089.00 .16 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,924,640.00 .61 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR OHM SP MTG 6.532 6.555 AM 91.531 5,658,203.13 1.90 OIN060692 6.00% 9/15/2028 AM 5,720,607.50 1.80 2,327,0B1.40 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF DER 1620E 6.545 3.091 AM 84.615 2,172,641.46 .68 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AM 1,969,645.71 .62 730,000.00 CONNIT TO FUR FNMA 11TH 6.555 6.534 AAA 93.563 712,206.25 .24 IIFOI1693 VAR RT 09/01/2029 AM 712,206.25 .22 22,500,000.00 CONNIT TO FOR GNMA SF HTG 6.563 6.B90 AM 94.344 21,242,343.75 3.35 01N062698 6.500% 01/15/2029 AAA 21,227,400.00 6.69 0,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN NTN 6.533 6.506 AM 100.594 8,012,576.00 2.38 31364CBD9 6,625% 04/10/2001 DD 04/18/96 AAA 0,047,520.00 2.54 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I OC6POIS22202 1999/O8/31 RUN DATE 01/02/11 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY BARNEY TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 9.000.000-.00 PNILIP NORRIS COS RT 6.593 9.128 A2 101.339 9,903,780.00 3.16 318154BB2 1.250% 02/15/2000 A 9,120,420.00 2.83 9,805,067.46 PNLMC GROUP 465-0436 6.628 7.009 AAA 99.888 10,039,541.95 3.42 312001,055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/9B AAA 9,874,016.16 3.11 2,261,073.85 GNBA II POOL 4080088H 6.705 6.842 AM 100.484 2.310.534.84 .78 3622WC20 6.835% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 ARA 2r232.017.45 .22 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL IBM LN MYG CORD DEAN 6.711 6.453 AAA 93.562 10,323,075.00 3.55 3134A3TC0 6.3001 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,244,010.00 3.23 2,000,000.00 BARSN 6 BCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.703 A2 98.771 1,192,200.00 .68 571749MO 6.6251 06/15/2004 DO O6/14/99 AA- 1,975,420.00 .62 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.909 Al 98.398 2,995,080.00 1.02 345393SJ3 6.200% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/91 A 2,951,940.00 .13 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC BTN SR 00024 6.I90 6.124 AA 96.506 2,900,000.00 1.00 12560PA14 5.9101 11/10/2003 DO 11/09/18 A4 21895,180.00 .11 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE RUNE LN6 INC NT 6.866 6.167 A3 99.323 2,499,400.00 .05 22237UASS 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2.458.035.00 .33 1,I08.563.55 GNMA II POOL #0080023 6.B69 6.952 AM 100.680 1.136,961.64 .59 36225CMI 3.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 RAN LI20.3I8.4I .54 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CORP NT 6.074 6.315 A2 95.015 964,650.00 .32 441912GFS 6.000% 05/01/2004 DO 04/30/99 A 950.150.00 .30 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.903 AAA 148.828 4.029.030.31 1.2E 912810W4 13.2508 05/15/2014 DD 05/15/04 AAA 3.320.300.00 1.17 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 3.512 9.490 HAA3 96.599 2,151,250.00 .66 542671CT3 9.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/13 A- 1.93Ir5BO.00 .61 TOTAL PIKED INCURS SECURITIES 4.614 6.130 294,608,962.33 100.00 288.445,316.36 90.83 Yllmu," YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 0 OCSF07522202 1999/OB/31 RUN DATE 09/02/99 DISTRICT. ICNO-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE : 10.57.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY PRESET TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE NARNET VALUE 0 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __--__---- -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 6.615 6.100 323,063,495.43 100.00 319:610,069.02 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: • 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR 7-99 06-Aug-1999 -9.35 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR 7-99 06-Aug-1999 -1.70 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 19-Aug-1999 -0.85 9936IM668 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 19-Aug-1999 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 157,969.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 -157,968.32 996085247 02-Aug-1999 157,968.32 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 157,968.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 -157,%8.32 996085247 02-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 02-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Erecutiw Wo kbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,760,997.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 -8,760,997.39 996085247 02-Aug-1999 8,760,997.39 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,760,997.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 -8,760,997.39 996085247 02-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 02-Aug-1999 &00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,400,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 02-Aug-1999 -9,391,979.67 29101DV96 08/09/1999 03-Aug-1999 9,391,978.67 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,400,000-00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 02-Aug-1999 -9,391,978.67 29IOlDV96 08/09/1999 03-Aug-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 03-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Aug-1999 -13.072,162.50 36959JVQ3 08/23/1999 09-Aug-1999 13,072,162.50 B GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-Aug-1999 -13,072,162.50 36959JVQ3 09/23/1999 09-Aug-1999 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC 09-Aug-1999 OAO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,066.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Aug-1999 -26,066.67 996085247 I]-Aug-1999 26,066.67 B 0.00 07-&p-/999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: •3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,066.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Aug-1999 -26,066.67 996085247 11-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 11-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,225.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-1999 -12,225.00 996095247 16-Aug-1999 12,225.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,225.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-1999 -12,225.00 996085247 16-AugA999 0.00 FC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,234,785.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-1999 -2,234,785.56 996085247 16-Aug-1999 2,234,785.56 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,234,795.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-1999 .2,234,785.56 996085247 16-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,903.70 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-Aug.1999 .3,903.70 996087094 VAR RT DD 06/26/1997 16-Aug-1999 3,903.70 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,903.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Aug-1999 .3,903.70 996085247 17-Aug-1999 3,903.70 B 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.'01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINfLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,903.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Aug-1999 -3,903.70 9%085247 17-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 17-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4.292.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Aug-1999 A,292.64 996085247 18-Aug-1999 4,292.64 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,292.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Aug-1999 A,292.64 996093247 18-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,492.23 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-Aug-1999 -14,482.23 996087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 18-Aug-1999 14,482.23 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 IBM DISC I9-Aug-1999 -13,939,216.67 44922BWH7 09/17/1999 IS-Aug-1999 13,939,216.67 B IBM CREDIT CORP 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 IBM DISC IS-Aug-1999 -13,939,216.67 44922BWH7 09/17/1999 18-AugA999 0.00 FC IBM CREDIT CORP I9-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I8-Aug-1999 -2,100,000.00 99361 M668 04.8600/e08/19/1999 DO 08/18/ 18-Aug-1999 2,100,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: •5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-Aug-1999 -2,100,000.00 99361M668 04.860Ye08/19/1999 DO 08/18/ 18-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC I9-Aug-1999 -2,193,352.33 34539UW99 09/09/1999 19-Aug-1999 2,193,352.33 B FORD MOTOR CREDIT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 19-Aug-1999 -2,193,352.33 34539UW99 09/09/1999 19-Aug-1999 0.00 FC FORD MOTOR CREDIT 19-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 211,292.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-1999 -211,282.45 996085247 20-Aug-1999 211,292.45 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 211,282.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-1999 -211.282.45 996095247 20-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 20-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,200,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 23-Aug-1999 -12,150,562.89 80311BWM9 09/21/1999 24-Aug-1999 12,150,562.99 B FIRST CHICAGO CAP MKTS INC, 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 12,200,000.00 SARA LEE CORP DISC 23-Aug-1999 -12,150.562.99 80311BWM9 09/21/1999 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC FIRST CHICAGO CAP MKTS INC, 24-Aug-1999 0.00 074ep-1999 16:01:06 Eiecudw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,523.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Aug4999 -3,523.50 996085247 24-Aug-1999 3,523.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,523.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Aug-1999 -3,523.50 996085247 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 24-Aug4999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 292,069.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Aug-1999 -292,069.05 996085247 24-Aug-1999 292,069.05 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 292,069.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Aug-1999 -292,069.05 996085247 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 24-Aug-1999 -896,476.50 313588LY9 MAT 09/20/1999 24-Aug-1999 896,476.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 24-Aug-1999 -896,476.50 313588LY9 MAT 09/20/1999 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,673.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Aug-1999 4,673.95 996085247 25-Aug-1999 4,673.95 B 0.00 07Sep-1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' ` 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,565.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Aug-1999 -5,565.00 996085247 25-Aug-1999 5,565.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,673.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Aug-1999 4,673.95 996085247 25-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 25-Au0999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,565.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Aug-1999 -5,565.00 996095247 25-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Aug-1999 -994,435.00 36959JX65 10/06/1999 25-Aug-1999 894.435.00 B GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Aug-1999 -894,435.00 36959JX65 10/06/1999 25-Aug-1999 0.00 PC GENERAL ELECTRIC 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,306.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Aug-1999 -26,306.27 996095247 27-Aug-1999 26,306.27 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,306.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Aug-1999 -26,306.27 996085247 27-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 27-Aug-1999 0.00 07Sep1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,255.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Aug-1999 -2,255.83 996085247 31-Aug-1999 2,255.93 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,255.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Aug-1999 -2,255.83 996085247 31-Aug4999 0.00 FC 31-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 328,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Aug4999 -328,125.00 996085247 31-Aug-1999 328,125.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 329,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Aug-1999 -328,125.00 996095247 31-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 31-Aug4999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 31-Aug-1999 -3,411,181.67 912795DK4 03/02/2000 DO 03/04/99 31-Aug-1999 3,411,181.67 B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 31-Aug-1999 -3,411,181.67 912795DK4 ONO2/2000 DD 03/04/99 31-Aug-1999 0.00 FC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 31-Aug-1999 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 13.3u1-1999 718,82L88 IIFO11665 VAR RT 08/012029 25-Aug-1999 -718,821.88 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-Seµ1999 16.01:06 ErecutNe Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: •9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 1 ITH DIST 13-Jul-1999 -718,821.98 I IF011685 VAR RT 08/01/2029 25-Aug-1999 718,821.98 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH DIST 13-Jul-1999 -718,821.98 11 F011695 VAR RT 08/012029 25-Aug-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-1ul-1999 5,861,328.13 OIN060684 6.00%8115/2028 24-Aug-1999 -5,861,329.13 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Jul-1999 10,135,781.25 OING62680 6.500%08/152029 24-Aug-1999 -10,135,781.25 BC LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Jul-1999 -5,961,328.13 OIND60684 6.00%8/152028 24-Aug-1999 5,861,328.13 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-1ul-1999 -5,861.328.13 OIN060694 6.00%8/152028 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,010.45 GNMA POOL#0470242 14-1ul-1999 -313,736.65 36209FLX5 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 24•Aug-1999 313,736.65 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Exec u.Wwkb.x h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOUDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,010.45 GNMA POOL80470242 14-Jul-1999 -1,349.70 36209FLX5 6.500%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,010.45 GNMA POOLd0470242 14-Jul-1999 -315,086.35 36209FLX5 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-AugA999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 328,826.36 GNMA POOL#0472936 14-Jul-1999 -317,420.20 36209ILRO 6.5009/6 05/152029 DID 05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 317A20.20 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 328.826.36 GNMA POOLM0472936 14-Jul-1999 -1,365.54 36209JLRO 6.500%05/152029DD05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 329,926.36 GNMA POOL80472936 144ul-1999 -319,785.74 362091LR0 6.500%05/152029DD05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 259.705.79 GNMA POOL#0492723 14-Jul-1999 -249,731.93 36210HLC4 6.500%04/152029 DO 041011 24-Aug-1999 249,731.93 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 258,705.79 GNMA POOL80492723 14-Jul-1999 -1,074.35 36210HLC4 6.500%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Exec dw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocs000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLiDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 259,705.79 GNMA POOLN0492723 14-Jul-1999 -250,806.28 36210HLC4 6.500%04/152029 DD 04/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 911,532.00 GNMA POOLM0493503 14-Ju1-1999 -979,913.23 36210JOL6 6.5000/08/152029 DD 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 879,913.23 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 911,532.00 GNMA POOLM0493503 14-Jul-1999 -3,785.39 36210JGL6 6.500%08/152029DD08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 911,532.00 GNMA POOLN0493503 14-lu1-1999 -883,698.62 36210JGL6 6.5000/a 08/152029 DD 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 88,567.40 GNMA POOL 90494334 14-Jul-1999 -95,495.22 3621OKEFS 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 85,495.22 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 88,567.40 GNMA POOL#0494334 14-Jul-1999 -367.80 36210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 98,567.40 GNMA POOL#0494334 14-Jul-1999 -85,863.02 36210KEF8 6.500%02/152029 DO 021011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-5eµ1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 371,690.56 GNMA POOL N0494334 14-Jul-1999 -358,787.99 36210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029 DD 02/011 24-Aug-1999 358,787.89 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 371,680.56 GNMA POOL80494334 14-Jul-1999 -1,543.51 36210KEF6 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 371,680.56 GNMA POOL#0494334 14-1ul-1999 -360,331.40 3621OKEFB 6.5000/.02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 532,330.09 GNMA POOL80494334 14-1ul-1999 -513,864.89 16210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 513.864.89 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 532,330.09 GNMA POOL#0494334 14-Jul-1999 -2,210.65 3621OKEF8 6.300%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 532,330.09 GNMA POOL#0494334 14-1ul-1999 -516,075.54 36210KEF8 6.50091.02/152029 DD 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 235,166.45 GNMA POOL80494821 14-Jul-1999 -227,009.11 36210KVN2 6.500%05/15/2029 DD OS/01/ 24-Aug-1999 227,009.11 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITYID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 235,166.45 GNMA POOL#0494821 144u1-1999 -976.59 36210KVN2 6.500%05/152029 DD 051011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 235,166.45 GNMA POOLR0494821 14-Jul-1999 -227,985.70 36210KVN2 6.500%05/152029 DO 0510V 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS MG NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 370,478.44 GNMA POOL#0495894 14-Jul-1999 -357,627.47 36210L3B7 6.500%01/152029 DD 011011 24-Aug-1999 357,627.47 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 370,478.44 GNMA POOL80495894 14-Jul-1999 -1,539.51 362101,3137 6.500%01/152029DD01/0l/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 370,478.44 GNMA POOL#0495894 14-Jul-1999 -359,165.98 36210L3B7 6.500%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 232,602.90 GNMA POOL#0498391 14-Jul-1999 -224,534.49 36210PUQ5 6.500%02/152029 DD 02101/ 24-Aug-1999 224,534.49 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 232,602.90 GNMA POOL80498391 14-1ul-1999 -965.95 36210PUQ5 6.500%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 18 0.00 07Srp1999 16:01:06 Ece wm ft kbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 232,602.90 GNMA POOL#0498391 14-Jul-1999 -225,500.44 36210PUQ5 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 557,917.69 GNMA POOL#0498534 14-Jul-1999 -538,469.39 3621 OPY73 6.500%06/15/2029 DO 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 539,469.39 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 557,817.69 GNMA POOL#0498534 14-Jul-1999 -2,316.49 3621OPY73 6.50D%06/15/2029 DO 06/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 557,817.69 GNMA POOL80498534 14-Jul-1999 -540,784.88 3621OPY73 6.500%06/IS/2029 DO D6/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 697,833.54 GNMA POOL80499674 14Jul-1999 -673,627.44 36210RCK4 6.50D%02/1 52 0 2 9DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 673,627.44 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 697,933.54 GNMA POOL#0499674 14-Jul-1999 -2,897.95 36210RCK4 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 697,833.54 GNMA PGOL80499674 14-Jul-1999 -676,525.39 36210RCK4 6.500°/h02/152029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16..01:06 EYeeurm Wwkb.n h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 671,273.14 GNMA POOL#0501389 144u1-1999 -647,988.35 36210S7A0 6.500%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 647,988.35 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 671,273.14 GNMA POOL#0501389 14-Jul-1999 -2,787.65 36210S7A0 6.500%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 671,273.14 GNMA POOL#0501389 14-Jul-1999 -650,776.00 36210S7A0 6.500%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.98 GNMA POOL#0502573 14-Jul-1999 -649,385.01 36210WS3 6.500%07/15/2029 DO 07101/ 24-Aug-1999 649,385.01 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.98 GNMA POOL#0502573 14-Jul-1999 -2,793.66 36210UJS3 6.500%07/15/2029 DD 07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.98 GNMA POOL90502573 14-Jul-1999 -652,178.67 3621OUJS3 6.500%07/15/2029DD07/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS D4C,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 248,992.62 GNMA POOL#0502720 14-Jul-1999 -240,355.69 36210UPD9 6.5001/607/1512029 DD 07/OI/ 24-Aug-1999 240,355.69 B LEHMAN BROS MC,NJ 0.00 07-Sep-/999 I6:01:06 ExeculNe Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 248,992.62 GNMA POOL80502720 14-Jul-1999 -1,034.01 36210UPD9 6.500%07/152029DD07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 248,992.62 GNMA POOL W0502720 14-Jul-1999 -241,389.70 36210UPD9 6.5000/007/15/2029DD07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS MC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 359,600.93 GNMA POOLN0502732 14-Jul-1999 -347,127.27 36210UPR8 6.500Yo07/152029 DD 071011 24-Aug-1999 347,127.27 B LEHMAN BROS INC.NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 359,600.93 GNMA POOLN0502732 14-1ul-1999 -1,493.34 36210UPR8 6.500"/e07/152029 DO 07/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 359.600.93 GNMA POOL#0502732 14-Jul-1999 -348,620.61 36210UPRS 6.500%0 711 5202 9 DO 07/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 270,020.03 GNMA POOLN0505576 14-Jul-1999 -260,653.71 3621OXT98 6.500°A 04/152029 DD 041011 24-Aug-1999 260,653.71 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 270,020.03 GNMA POOLN0505576 14-Jul-1999 -1,121.33 3621OXT98 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 07-S.,1999 16.01:06 E wiv Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000JWW 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 270,020.03 GNMA POOL80505576 14-Jul-1999 -261,775.04 36210XT98 6.500%04/152029 DD 04/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NI 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 299,014.48 GNMA POOL00506895 14-Jul-1999 -288,642.42 36211 ACV 6.500%05/15/2029 DD 05101/ 24-Aug-1999 288,642.42 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 299,014.48 GNMA POOL80506895 14-Jul-1999 -1,241.74 36211 AC87 6.500%05/152029 DD 05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 299,014.48 GNMA POOL40506895 14-1ul-1999 -299,994.16 3621 IAC87 6.500%05/152029 DD 05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 442,281.73 GNMA POOL 80509960 14-Jul-1999 426,940.08 36211 DQM5 6.300%06/152029 DO 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 426,940.09 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 442,291.73 GNMA POOL80509960 14-Jul-1999 -1,836.70 36211 DQM5 6.500%06/152029 DD 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 442,281.73 GNMA POOL80509960 14-Jul-1999 429,776.79 36211 DQM5 6.500%061152029 DD 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-SW-1999 16:01:06 E.,cuuw Wwk6cncA Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,050.00 GNMA POOL#0481620 14-Jul-1999 -482,704.52 36209UAV8 6.500%08/152029 DO 08/01/ 24-AugA999 482,704.52 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,050.00 GNMA POOL40481620 14-Jul-1999 .2,076.60 36209UAV8 6.500°.508/152029DDOg/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,050.00 GNMA POOL#0481620 14-Jul-1999 -484,781.12 36209UAV8 6.5005e08/152029 DD 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS MC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,265.99 GNMA POOL#0486958 14-Jul-1999 ,291,781.04 36210ASTO 6.500%021152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 291,781.04 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,265.89 GNMA POOL#0486958 14-Jul-1999 -1,255.24 3621OA5TO 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,265.89 GNMA POOL#0486959 14-Jul-1999 -293,036.28 3621OA5TO 6.5009/.0211512029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS D4C,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 327,379.50 GNMA POOL#0486958 14-Jul-1999 -316,023.52 3621OA5TO 6.500%021152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 316,023.52 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 07-&e 1999 16:0/:06 EYecutiw Wwkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: -19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 327,379.50 GNMA POOLN0486958 14-Jul-1999 -1,359.53 36210A5TO 6.500%02/1512029 DD 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 327,379.50 GNMA POOLW0486958 14-Jul-1999 -317,383.05 3621OA5TO 6.500%02/152029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-19919 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 297,915.02 GNMA POOL 90490170 14-1ul-1999 -287,581.09 36210EQXO 6.500%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 287,581.09 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 297,915.02 GNMA POOLA0490170 14-1u1-1999 -1,237.17 36210EQX0 6.500%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 113 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 297,915.02 GNMA POOLk0490170 14-Jul-1999 -289,818.26 36210EQXO 6.500%04/152029DD04/OI/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 303,408.46 GNMA POOL80492485 14-Jul-1999 -292,883.98 36210HCWO 6.500%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 292,883.98 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 303,408.46 GNMA PGOL80492485 14-Ju1-1999 -1,259.99 36210HCWO 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 07-&p-1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 303,408.46 GNMA POOL#0492485 14-1ul-1999 -294,143.97 36210HCW0 6.500%0 411 5/2 02 9 DD 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 492,401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 14-1ul-1999 -475,320.90 36210AST0 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 475,320.90 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 492.401.06 GNMA POOL#0486958 14-Jul-1999 -2,044.83 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 492.401.06 GNMA POOL#0486958 14-1ul-1999 -477,365.73 36210AST0 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 403,169.89 GNMA POOLW0482943 14-Jul-1999 -389,184.93 36209VP40 6.500%01/152029DD01/0l/ 24-Aug-1999 389,184.93 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 403,169.99 GNMA POOL M0482943 14-Jul-1999 -1,674.27 36209VP40 6.500%0 111 52 0 2 9 DO 01/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 111 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 403,169.89 GNMA POOL80482943 14-Jul-1999 -390,859.20 36209VP40 6.500%01115/2029DD01/0l/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07Sep-1999 16:01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-1u1-1999 -11,59I,250.00 OIN062680 6.500%08/15/2029 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-Aug-1999 -11,362,500.00 OIN062698 6.500%09/15/2028 21-Sep-1999 11,362,500.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 05-Aug-1999 -304,350.00 52517PPQ8 8.150%05/152000 DO 10/16/9. 10-Aug-1999 304,350.00 B LEHMAN BROS MC,NJ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 05-Aug-1999 -11,995.42 52517PPQB 8.150Ya05115/2000 DO 10/16(9 10-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 05-Aug-1999 -316.235.42 52517PPQS 8.150%05/152000 DO 10116/9 10-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS ING NJ 10-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-Aug-I999 -9,879,843.75 OIN062699 6.500%09/152029 21-Sep-1999 9,879,843.75 E DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 09-Aug-1999 -5,658,203.13 OIN060692 6.00%9/152028 21-Sep-1999 5,658,203.13 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-&p-1999 16.0106 &s cutme Waskbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH I I-Aug-1999 -712,206.25 11F011693 VAR RT 09/012029 23-Sep-1999 712,206.25 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000-00 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 13-Aug-1999 500,000.00 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 082619 26-Aug-1999 500,000.00 B MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 13-Aug-1999 -500,000.00 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 08/26/9 26-Aug-1999 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIT E3 A 01-Aug4999 -3.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Aug-1999 3.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Aug-1999 .3.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,581.02 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Aug-1999 -11,581.02 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Aug-1999 11,581.02 PU 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16:01.:06 Erecudve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000lW00 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,581.02 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Aug-1999 -11,581.02 3133T17A4 6.0001/o 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 17-Aug-1999 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 304u1-1999 4,188,356.67 313396KQ5 MAT08119/1999 30-Jul-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,191,978.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Aug-1999 8,191,978.67 996085247 03-Aug-1999 -8,191,978.67 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9.191,978.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Aug-1999 8,191,978.67 996085247 03-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 03-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-1999 9.35 996095247 06-Aug-1999 -9.35 S 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -9.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-1999 9.35 9%085247 06-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 06-Aug-1999 0.00 07Sep-1999 16:01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSLI-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-1999 1.70 996085247 06-Aug-1999 -1.70 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-1999 1.70 996085247 06-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 06-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -272,162.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Aug-1999 272,162.50 996085247 09-Aug-1999 ,272,162.50 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -272,162.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Aug-1999 272,162.50 996085247 09-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -316,235.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-AugA999 316,235.42 996095247 10-Aug-1999 -316,235.42 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -316,235.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Aug-1999 316,235.42 996095247 10-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 10-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,903.70 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-Aug-1999 3,903.70 996087094 VAR RT DO 0626/1997 17-Aug-1999 -3,903.70 S 0.00 07Sep-1999 16.01:06 Execu iw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST! TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,154,071.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Aug-1999 2,154,071.30 996085247 19-Aug-1999 -2,154,071.30 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,154,071.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Aug-1999 2,154,071.30 996085247 18-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,492.23 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 19-Aug-1999 14,492.23 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 19-Aug-1999 -14,482.23 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -78,597.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Aug-1999 78,587.45 996085247 19-Aug-1999 -78,587.45 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -78,587.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Aug-1999 79,587.45 996085247 19-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 19-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-Aug-1999 2,100,000.00 99361M668 04.860%08/19/1999 DO 09/181 19-Aug-1999 -2,100,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-Aug-1999 283.50 99361 M668 04.960%09/19/1999 DD OS/19/ 19-Aug-1999 0.00 is 0.00 07-Sep1999 /6:01:06 &ecwiw FV rkbencR Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-Aug-1999 2,100,283.50 9936IM668 04.860%08/19/1999 DO 08/18/ 19-Aug-1999 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NJ 19-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-AugA999 500,000.00 996095247 26-Aug-1999 ,500,000.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Aug-1999 500,000.00 996085247 26-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 26-Aug-1999 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Jul-1999 8,279,661.89 912827Z54 06.375%09/30/2001 DD 09/301 02-Aug-1999 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 02-AugA999 11,375,625.00 OIN062680 6.500%08/1512029 24-Aug-1999 -11,591,250.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY ,215,625.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 02-Aug-1999 11,375,625.00 OIN062680 6.500%08/15/2029 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -403,169.89 GNMA POOL 90482943 06-Aug-1999 379,798.64 36209VP40 6.5009/o 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -389,184.93 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -9.386.29 07-.Sep-/999 16.01:06 Ececutiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -403,169.89 GNMA POOL#0492943 06-Aug-1999 1,674.27 36209VP40 6.500%01/15/2029 DO 011011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 1s 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,403,169.89 GNMA POOL#0492943 06-Aug-1999 381,472.91 36209VP40 6.500%01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302,265.89 GNMA POOL#0436958 06-Aug-1999 284,743.91 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02101/ 24-Aug-1999 ,291,791.04 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR .7,037.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302.265.99 GNMA POOL#0496959 06-Aug-1999 1,255.24 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302.265.89 GNMA POOL80486958 06-Aug-1999 285,999.15 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -327,379.50 GNMA POOL#0486959 06-Aug-1999 308.401.72 36210A5T0 6.500°A02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 -316,023.52 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR .7,621.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -327,379.50 GNMA POOL80486958 06-Aug.1999 1,359.53 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02101/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Sep1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -327,379.50 GNMA POOL 90486958 06-Aug-1999 309,761.25 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -092,401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 06-Aug-1999 463,857.19 36210ASTO 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -475,320.90 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -11,463.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 492,401.06 GNMA POOLN0486958 06-Aug-1999 2,044.83 36210A5T0 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 15 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -492,401.06 GNMA POOL80486958 06-Aug-1999 465,902.02 36210A5T0 6.5009/9 02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 26-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -249.992.62 GNMA POOL#0502720 06-Aug-1999 234,558.83 36210UPD9 6.500%07/15/2029 DO 07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -240,355.69 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -5,796.86 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -248,992.62 GNMA POOLR0502720 06-Aug-1999 1,034.01 36210UPD9 6.500%07/15/2029DD07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -248,992.62 GNMA POOL#0502720 06-Aug-1999 235,592.84 36210UPD9 6.500%07/15/2029 DO 071011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 25-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 I6:01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -325,010.45 GNMA POOL#0470242 06-Aug-1999 306,170.00 36209FLX5 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -313,736.65 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -7,566.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -325,010.45 GNMA POOL#0470242 06-Aug-1999 1,349.70 36209FLX5 6.500%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 24-AugA999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -325,010.45 GNMA POOL#0470242 06-Aug.1999 307,519.70 36209FLX5 6.500%04/15/2029 DD 04/011 24-AugA999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -328,826.36 GNMA POOL N0472936 06-Aug-1999 309,764.71 36209JLRO 6.500%05/152029 DO 051011 24-Aug4999 -317,420.20 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -7,655.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -328,826.36 GNMA POOL#0472936 O6-Aug-1999 1,365.54 36209JLRO 6.5009/605/15/2029 DO 051011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -329,826.36 GNMA POOL#0472936 06-Aug-1999 311,130.25 36209JLRO 6.500%05/15/2029 DO 051011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE RK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,050.00 GNMA POOL 00481620 06-Aug-1999 471,062.73 36209UAV8 6.500%09/152029 DO 08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 482,704.52 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -11,641.79 07-Sep-/999 16.01:06 Executive IPwkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,050.00 GNMA POOL80481620 06-Aug-1999 2,076.60 36209UAV8 6.500%08/15/2029DD08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,050.00 GNMA POOL80481620 06-Aug-1999 473,139.33 36209UAVS 6.500%08H52029DD08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,915.02 GNMA POOL#0490170 06-Aug-1999 280,645.26 36210EQXO 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/011 24-Aug-1999 -287,581.09 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -6,935.83 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,915.02 GNMA POOL80490170 06-Aug-1999 1,237.17 36210EQXO 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,915.02 GNMA POOLg0490170 06-Aug-1999 281,882.43 36210EQXO 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -303.408.46 GNMA POOL#0492495 06-Aug-1999 295,820.25 36210HCW0 6.5000A 04/152029 DD 04/011 24-Aug-1999 -292,983.98 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -7,063.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -303,408.46 GNMA POOLND492485 06-Aug-1999 1,259.99 36210HCWO 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 07Seµ1999 16.01:06 Executive Wwkb.-u Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 303.409.46 GNMA POOL80492485 06-Aug.1999 287,080.24 36210HCWO 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug.1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -258,705.79 GNMA POOL#0492723 06-Aug-1999 243,708.94 36210HLC4 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 24-Aug.1999 -249.731.93 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -6,022.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,258,705.79 GNMA POOL80492723 06-Aug-1999 1,074.35 36210HLC4 6.500%04/152029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -258,705.79 GNMA POOL#0492723 06-Aug-1999 244,783.29 36210HLC4 6.500%04/152029 DO 04/0U 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -911,532.00 GNMA POOL 00493503 06-Aug-1999 $59,691.63 362101GL6 6,500%08/152029 DO 08/011 24-Aug-1999 479,913.23 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -21,221.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -911,532.00 GNMA POOL80493503 06-Aug-1999 3,783.39 3621010L6 6.500%08/152029DD08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -911,532.00 GNMA POOL80493503 06-Aug-1999 862,477.02 3621WGL6 6.500%0S/152029DD08/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Execmiw Wmkb..h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -532,330.09 GNMA POOL#0494334 06-Aug-1999 501,471.58 36210KEF8 6.500%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -513,864.89 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR .12,393.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,532,330.09 GNMA POOL80494334 06-Aug-1999 2,210.65 36210KEF8 6.5001%02/192029 DO 021011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -532,330.09 GNMA POOLA0494334 06-Aug-1999 503,682.23 36210KEF8 6.5009/602/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-I999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -88,567.40 GNMA POOL 00494334 06-Aug-1999 83,433.26 36210KEF8 6.5009A02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 45,495.22 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -2,061.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .88,567.40 GNMA POOL 90494334 06-Aug-1999 367.80 36210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -88,567.40 GNMA POOLd0494334 06-Aug-1999 83,801.06 36210KEF8 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug.1999 0.00 PC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -371,680-56 GNMA POOL#0494334 06-Aug-1999 350,134.70 36210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 24-Aug-1999 -358,787.89 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR .8,653.19 07-Sep4999 16:01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -371,680.56 GNMA POOL80494334 06-Aug-1999 1,543.51 36210KEF8 6.500%02115/2029 DD 02/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -371,630.56 GNMA POOL#0494334 06-Aug-1999 351,679.21 36210KEF8 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -235,166.45 GNMA POOLd0494821 06-Aug-1999 221,534.14 36210KVN2 6.5001/ 05/15/2029DD05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -227,009.11 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -5,474.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -235,166.45 GNMA POOL80494821 06-Aug-1999 976.59 36210KVN2 6.500%05/152029DD05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -235,166.45 GNMA POOL 00494921 06-Aug-1999 222,510.73 36210KVN2 6.500%05/15/2029 DD 05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -370,478.44 ONMA POOL80495894 06-Aug-1999 349,002.27 3621OL387 6.5000/o01/15/2029DDOI/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -357,627.47 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -8,625.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -370,479.44 GNMA POOL#0495894 06-Aug-1999 1,539.51 36210L3B7 6.500%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Executive Wmkbmh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -370,478.44 GNMA POOLN0495894 06-Aug-1999 350,540.78 36210L3B7 6.50W .01/15/2029DD01/0l/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -232,602.90 GNMA POOL80498391 06-Aug-1999 219,119.20 36210PUQ5 6.500%02/152029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -224,534.49 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -5,415.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -232,602.90 GNMA POOL#0498391 06-Aug-1999 965.95 36210PUQS 6.500%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -232,602.90 GNMA POOLg0498391 06-Aug-1999 220,085.15 36210PUQ5 6.500%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -697,833.54 GNMA POOL#0499674 06-Aug-1999 657,381.00 36210RCK4 6.500%0 211 52 02 9 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -673,627.44 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -16,246.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -697,833.54 GNMA POOL#0499674 06-Aug-1999 2,897.95 36210RCK4 6.500%02/152029 DO 021011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -697,933.54 GNMA POOL#0499674 06-Aug-1999 660,279.95 36210RCK4 6.5001/.02/152029 DO 02/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Exeeur/ve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -671,273.14 GNMA POOL#0501389 06-Aug-1999 632,360.28 36210S7A0 6.500%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -647,998.35 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -15,628.07 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -671,273.14 GNMA POOL80501389 06-Aug-1999 2,787.65 36210S7A0 6.500%03/152029DD03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -671,273.14 GNMA POOL#0501389 06-Aug-1999 635,147.93 36210S7A0 6.5000/.03/152029 DO 03/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.99 GNMA POOL#0502573 06-Aug-1999 633.723.24 36210U1S3 6.500%07/152029 DD 07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -649,385.01 S DEUTSCHE BE.SEC INC,NEW YOR -15,661.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.98 GNMA POOL#0502573 06-Aug-1999 2,793.66 36210U1S3 6.500Ye07/152029 DO 07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 672,719.98 GNMA POOL#0502573 06-Aug-1999 636,516.90 36210U1S3 6.500%07/152029DD07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -359,600.93 GNMA POOL 80502732 06-Aug-1999 339,755.31 36210UPR8 6.500%0 711 5 2 0 29 DO 07AH/ 24-Aug-1999 -347,12727 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -8,371.96 07-Sep-1999 16:01:06 &ecutwe II'wkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTFUCT PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -359,600.93 GNMA POOL#0502732 06-Aug-1999 - 1,493.34 36210UPRS 6.500%07/15/2029 DO 07/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -359,600.93 GNMA POOL#0502732 06-Aug-1999 340,248.65 36210UPR8 6.500%07/152029 DO 071011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,020.03 GNMA POOL80505576 06-Aug-1999 254,367.31 3621OXT98 6.500%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -260,653.71 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -6,286.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,020.03 GNMA POOL80505576 06-Aug-1999 1,121.33 36210XT98 6.500%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,020.03 GNMA POOL80505576 06-Aug-1999 255,488.64 3621OXT98 6.500%04/15/2029 DO 04/011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC MC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -299,014.48 GNMA POOL60506895 06-Aug-1999 281,690.98 36211AC87 6.500%05/152029DD05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -298.642.42 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -6,%1.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -299,014.48 GNMA POOL#0506895 06-Aug-1999 1,241.74 3621IAC87 6.500^/05/152029 DD 05/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16.01:06 Execwive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -299,014.48 GNMA POOL 00506893 06-Aug-1999 292,922.72 36211AC87 6.500%05/15/2029 DO 051011 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -442,291.73 GNMA POOL#0509960 06-Aug-1999 416,643.21 36211DQM5 6.500%06/152029 DO 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -426.940.08 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -10,296.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -442,281.73 GNMA POOL#0509960 06-Aug-1999 1,836.70 36211 DQM5 6.500%06/152029 DO 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -442,281.73 GNMA POOL80509960 06-Aug-1999 418,479.91 36211 DQM5 6.500%06/152029 DO DOI/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -557,917.69 GNMA POOL#0499534 06-Aug-1999 525,481.70 36210PY73 6.500%06/152029 DO 06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 -538,469.39 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -12,986.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -557,817.69 GNMA POOL00498534 06-Aug-1999 2,316.49 3621OPY73 6.500%06/152029DD06101/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 Is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -557,817.69 GNMA POOL80498534 WAug-1999 527,798.19 3621OPY73 6.500%06/15/2029DD06/01/ 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-/999 16:01:06 &ecmm Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 09-Aug-1999 5,664,062.50 OIN060694 6.00%8/152028 24-Aug-1999 -5,861,328.13 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -197,265.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 09-Aug4999 5,664,062.50 OIN060684 6.00%8/15/2028 24-Aug-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH DIST II-Aug-1999 712,662.50 I IF011685 VAR RT 08/01/2029 25-Aug-1999 -718,821.88 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -6,159.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA I ITH DIST II-Aug-1999 712,662.50 111`011685 VAR RT 08/012029 25-Aug-1999 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,650,054.66 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 13-Aug-1999 3,621,538.61 78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/252005 DD 0320/9 I&Aug-1999 -3,608,563.80 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 12,974.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,650,054.66 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 13-Aug-1999 12,112.98 78442GAK2 VAR RT 1025/2005 DO 0320/9 18-Aug-1999 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,650,054.66 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 13-Aug-1999 3,633,651.59 78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/252005 DD 0320/9 18-Aug-1999 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 18-Aug-1999 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 07-Sep-/999 /6.-0I:06 Execmive Warkbe.M Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G00010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 96,578.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-1u1-1999 -96,579.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Jul-1999 96,694.13 PDC 105.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .96,582.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jul-1999 96,582.00 3133TCE95 6.324%09/152032 01-3u1-1999 -96,687.64 PD -105.64 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -96,582.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-1ul-1999 96,592.00 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-1u1-1999 0.00 PC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -243,922.45 FHLMC GROUP OGS-0476 01-Aug-1999 243,922.45 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-1999 -247,733.74 PD -3,811.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -243,922.45 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Aug-1999 243,922.45 3129DDQ55 7.0000/.02/01/2003 DD 02/011 01-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,560.55 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 01-Aug-1999 57,560.55 36225CAZ9 7.000%1 212 02 0 2 6 DD 12/01/ 01-Aug-1999 -58,513.90 PD -953.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,560.55 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Aug-1999 57,560.55 36225CAZ9 7.000%121202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 20-Aug-1999 0.00 07Sep1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .45,035.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Aug-1999 45,035.25 3133T02D5 5.900%06115/2017 01-Aug-1999 .44,971.92 PD 63.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,035.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Aug-1999 45,035.25 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -79,650.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Aug-1999 79,650.00 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Aug-1999 .79,737.12 PD .87.12 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -131,994.14 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Aug-1999 131,994.14 36225CC20 6.875%06/20/2027 DD 06101/ 01-Aug-1999 -134,881.51 PD -2,887.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -131,994.14 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Aug-1999 131,994.14 36225CC20 6.875%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 20-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK.AUTO TR 96A C 15-Aug-1999 13,481.54 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1519 15-Aug-1999 .13,481.54 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,481.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR%A C 15-Aug-1999 13.481.54 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1519 15-Aug-1999 0.00 PC 16-Aug-1999 0.00 MATURITIES 07-Sep-1999 16::01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. •41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 03-Aug4999 1,195,296.67 19121EV34 0&103/1999 03-Aug-1999 -1,195,296.67 MT 03-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 09-Aug-1999 399,214.45 03018BV97 08/09/1999 09-Aug-1999 -399,214.45 MT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,400,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 09-Aug-1999 9,391,979.67 29101DV96 08/09/1999 09-Aug-1999 -9,391,979.67 MT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 09-Aug-1999 2,987,433.44 74271SV93 08/09119" 09-Aug-1999 -2,987,433.44 MT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10.200,000.00 IBM DISC 18-Aug-1999 10,158,505.83 45920EVJ7 08/18/1999 18-Aug-1999 10,158,505.83 MT 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-Aug-1999 13,072,162.50 36959JVQ3 09/23119" 23-Aug-1999 -13,072,162.50 MT 23-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 24-Aug-1999 889,090.00 313588KV6 MAT 08/24/19" 24-Aug-1999 -889,080.00 MT 24-Aug-1999 0.00 07ST-1999 16:01:06 Eeecmiv Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-AUG-1999 -31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,00no GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Aug-1999 894,803.25 36959JVRI 08/25/1999 25-Aug-1999 -894,803.25 MT 25-Aug-1999 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP NT 01-Aug-1999 150,000.00 173034DQ9 9.750%08/01/1999 01-Aug-1999 -151,663.50 MT 01-Aug-1999 -1,663.50 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Aug-1999 3,300,000.00 912827R20 06.875%08/31/1999 DO 09131/ 31-Aug-1999 -3,308,636.72 MT 31-Aug-1999 -8,636.72 CORPORATE ACTIONS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -793,974.67 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL 16-Aug-1999 793,974.89 161614AE2 5.900%11/152001 DO 11/15/9 16-Aug-1999 0.00 FC 16-Aug-I999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -793,974.67 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL 16-Aug-1999 793,974.89 161614AE2 5.9009/6 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/9 16-Aug-1999 -792,330.90 CAL 1,643.99 INTEREST 07Sep-/999 16.01:06 &ecuiiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ,43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-Aug-1999 0.03 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-Aug-1999 7.99 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-Aug-1999 265,625.00 912827206 06.250%01/31/2002 DO 01/31/ 31-Jul-1999 oho IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP NT 02-Aug-1999 7,312.50 173034DQ9 9.750%08/01/1999 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 655.79 996085247 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 800570 02-Aug-1999 13,005.42 441SIKZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/041 02-Aug4999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-1999 7,174.21 996035247 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 02-Aug-1999 0.00 074ep-1999 16.01:06 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 03-Aug-1999 4,713.33 19121EV34 08/03/1999 03-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 03-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 09-Aug4999 785.55 03Oi8BV97 09/09/1999 09-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,400,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 09-Aug-1999 8,021.33 29101DV96 08/09/1999 09-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 09-Aug-1999 12,566.56 74271SV93 08/09/1999 09-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 09-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 1 I-Aug4999 26,066.67 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05111/ 11-Aug-1999 0.00 IT II-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 16-Aug-1999 12,225.00 52517PPQ8 8.150%05/152000DD 10/16M 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 000196 16-Aug-1999 166,250.00 52517PID4 6.650%11/OS/2000 DD 11/08/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 07S¢p-1999 16:01:06 Executiw WoAknch Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. -45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-Aug4999 416,250.00 718154BB2 9.250%02/152000 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 16-Aug-1999 99,450.00 91240QJAI 6.6300/007/09/2002 DO 07/09/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-Aug-1999 278.125.00 912810DE5 11.125%09115/2003 DO 07/05/ 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,700,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL 16-Aug-1999 3,903.70 161614AE2 5.900%11/15/2001 DO 11/15/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 243,922.45 FHLMC GROUP SG5-0476 16-Aug-1999 59,085.89 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-I999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,035.25 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 16-AugA999 3,932.71 3133T02D5 5.900°/h06/15/2017 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 96,582.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 16-Aug-1999 19,037.89 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Jul-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16:0/.:06 Execwiv Wo kbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-Aug-1999 3.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/15/2032 01-Jul-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,491.54 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Aug-1999 657.94 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/15/9 15-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 16-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,581.02 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 17-Aug-1999 11,581.02 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 17-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-Aug-1999 51,493.78 370425QV5 FLTG RT 09/18/2003 DO 08/17/ 18-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,200,000A0 IBM DISC 18-Aug-1999 41,494.17 4592DEVJ7 08/18/1999 IS-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 18-Aug-1999 4,292.64 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/19/2000 DO 051191 18-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 18-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FM MTN 20-Aug-1999 14,482.23 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/081 20-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 20-Aug-1999 0.00 07Sep-1999 16.01:06 EcecWiv¢Workbench © ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ,47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCsG00010p00 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,560.55 GNMA 11 POOL 00080023 20-Aug-1999 9,014.59 36225CAZ9 7.000%12202026 DD 1210V 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 20-Aug-1999 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 131,994.14 ONMA 11 POOL 0080088M 20-Aug-1999 12,713.17 36225CC20 6.875%06/202027 DO 06101/ 01-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 20-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 24-Aug-1999 10,92000 313588KV6 MAT OI24/1999 24-Aug-1999 0,00 IT 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-Aug-1999 27,83Z50 369591VQ3 0824/1999 23-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 24-Aug-1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Aug-1999 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 C500%0925/2018 25-1u1-1999 0.00 IT 25-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000,00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Aug-1999 5.196.75 36959JVRI 0825/1999 25-Aug-1999 000 IT 25-Aug-I999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 27-Aug-I999 26,306.27 345397SC8 FLTG RT 09272006 DO 0827/ 27-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 27-Aug-I999 0.00 O7.Sep1999 16:01:06 Fiecu w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAOE.. 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-1999-31-AUG-1999 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Aug-1999 171,875.00 9128273G5 06.250%0 813 1/20 02 DO 09/02/ 31-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 31-Aug4999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Aug-1999 156,250.00 9128272L5 06.250%02/20002 DO 02/28/ 31-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 31-Aug-1999 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Aug-1999 113,437.50 912827R20 06.975%08/31/1999 DO 09131/ 31-Aug-1999 0.00 IT 31-Aug-1999 0.00 07-Sep-1999 16:01:06 Emullm Wyk may. FAHR COMMITTEE MeebngDa� I Toad. 09/08/99 Ds/m99 AGENDA REPORT Number I Mbyj Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 1999 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H:Mp. �10Wou4WUNxylmMgmlRepN&9l dx w.u.e_ „� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are four comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of March 31, 1999, and June 30, 1999. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period April 1 through June 30, 1999. Portfolio Performance Summary Quarter Ended June 30.1999 Liquid Operating Monies °at) Long-Term Operating Monies(%) Total Rate Total Rate o of Return Benchmark(' Return Benchmark"' 3 Months 1.2 1.1 0.1 0.2 fi Months 2.3 2.2 0.5 0.6 9 Months 3.7 3.4 1.1 1.2 12 Months 5.2 4.7 5.0 4.9 Since inception 30 Sept 95 5.5 5.1 GA 6.1 Market Value per PIMCO 30 June 99 $19.0M $305.9M Average Quality "AA.- "AAA" Covent Yield(%) 5.26 6.21% Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 5.32 5.90 uarterty Deposits(WN,tlrawals) Estimated Annual Income $1.om lilaom (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt 1-5 Year Bond Index Market Recap Interest rates rose sharply during the second quarter of 1999 as continued rapid growth in the U.S. economy, and signs of recovery in overseas markets, heightened concern that the Federal Reserve would boost interest rates to prevent a resurgence in inflation. A I". BVmg1c..,. Q..r lylmM9MrRep 9A9 dx R--d 11566 Page 2 On the last day of the quarter, the Fed raised the federal funds rate 25 basis points, from 4.75% to 5.00%, in a pre-emptive move to control inflation. Rising interest rates created an unfavorable setting for bonds in the second quarter, affecting all fixed income market sectors. Rates rose across the entire Treasury yield curve, driven largely by the belief of investors that the Fed would raise interest rates. As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the Historical Yield Curve, the yield on the 30-year Treasury benchmark jumped 34 basis points when compared to the end of the first quarter 1999 (5.62%), ending the second quarter at 5.96%. Yields on 10- year Treasury bonds ended the quarter at 5.78%, a climb of 56 basis points from the end of the first quarter (5.23%). Shorter rates showed similar significant increases. The 3-month Treasury rate increased by 31 basis points (from 4.46%to 4.77%); the 6-month rate jumped a full 51 basis points (from 4.52 % to 5.03%); and the 1-year rate rose 36 basis points (from 4.70%to 5.06%). For the Long-Tenn Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted maturity or duration slightly above the duration index (2.4 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing holdings in mortgage-backed bonds, investment grade corporate notes, and U.S. Agency securities. The performance of the portfolio lagged its benchmark by ten basis points for the second quarter(0.10%vs. 0.20%). Generally, the slight under-performance of the Long-Term portfolio in the short- tern was due to: First, the above-index duration maintained by PIMCO, which detracted from returns on the margin as yields rose, especially in June. Since bond prices and yields move in opposite directions, bond prices fell as yields rose. In June, the price decline was greater than the income earned on the bonds, and total return declined for the quarter. Second, PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage and corporate holdings, as these investment sectors under-performed the index during the month of June. In the long-term, by comparison, PIMCO has outperformed the index by 29 basis points on an annualized basis since inception of the investment program in September 1995. For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO used a duration posture slightly above index (approximately 130 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing slightly longer short-term U.S. Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate commercial paper than the index. This added returns to the portfolio, which slightly outperformed its benchmark (1.2%vs. 1.1%) for the second quarter. Market Outlook Forecasts from PIMCO report that economic expansion will continue, though at a slower pace, as higher interest rates begin to slow consumer and investment spending. Moderating growth and relatively low inflation will keep interest rates near their current levels over the coming months, making yield more important than price movement in determining portfolio returns. x w.auwna,w�,.,a�n-n� �w�,%osmc Page 3 The PIMCO investment strategy targets portfolio duration slightly above index to take advantage of higher yields provided by longer maturity securities. PIMCO indicates that they will emphasize short maturity holdings in investment-grade corporates and adjustable rate mortgage securities, and longer maturity holdings in U.S. Agency debentures and high-quality asset backed and mortgage backed securities. The attached letter from PIMCO provides a more detailed description of second quarter market conditions, portfolio returns, future market outlook, and their recommended investment strategy for the District's Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio. Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Tarn Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies($M) Monies(9M) 30 June 98 18.1 311.5 30 Sept.98 18.4 282.8 31 Dec.98 18.6 304.5 L31 rd1 Ma99 18.8 305.8 30 June 99 19.0 305.9 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Four Comparative Bar Charts 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph 6. PIMCO Letter dated August 26, 1999 SVK:Ic H:bn��1PlmehlpueepRybrvM�mlaepv1493.Eec aewee: 1� Page 4 Prepared by Finance,8117199, 3:07 PM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 iii -- " " iii - iii - ... iii ... ♦.♦ ♦.♦ iii iii iii $200,000,000 iii iii - iii - - iii iii iii iii ••• ♦•♦ ♦•♦ ♦. ... ♦.♦ ..♦ ♦ ♦.♦ $150,000,000 ��� +�� iii - ��i iii iii iii ••• ��• ��� $100,000,000 **+ iii iii iii ... •.• •.• $50,000,000 iii i.i iii - ----- $0 30 Jun 98 30 Sep 98 31 Dec 98 31 Mar 99 30 Jun 99 10 Liquid Operating Monies ® Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\FinanceVnvestmgmtprogram Prepared by Finanoe, 8/17/99, 2:53 PM OCSD Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio 100 Investment Diversification 100100 . 90 80 ,^ 70 60 O 3/31/99 a 50 ® 6/30/99 40 a 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dta\fin\22201geggi\FinanceWortfolio short term Prepared by Finance, 8/17/99, 2:52 PM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 90 80 70 605454 ❑ 3/31/99 50 ® 6/30/99 40 a 30 2s 20 11 10 a 00 00 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:lexcel.dla\fin\2220\geggilFinancelPortfolio long term graph Prepared by Finance, 8/26/99, 10:17 AM OCSD Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 70 60 .. ❑ 3/31/99 50 43 ® 6/30/99 a40 32 39 30 21 22 20 10 3 3 0 A1/P1 AAA AA A G:\excel.Cla\M\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio short term e'^r . Prepared by Finance, 8/26/99. 10:17 AM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 74 70 70 60 ❑ 3/31/99 50 ® 6/30/99 ate`) 40 a 30 20 19 20 10 8 2 2 0 A1/P1 AAA AA A G:texcel.dta\flnt22201geggi\FinancetPortfolio long term graph Prepared by Finance, 8/5/99, 8:54 AM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 6.50 6.25 6.00 5.75 5.50 9 5.25 5.00 4.76 4.50 4.25 4.00 E E 5 S 5 5 5 S 5 5 ea of t31-De�98 6 31-Mar-99 t3Jun-99 G:\exoel.dlaVin122201geggAFlnance91ls1orimiTREASURYyleldcume r PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY 840 Newton,Curler Drive Post Colo.Boa W 30 Newport Beach August 26, 1999 Calihvn4936i9.6a30 949 • 640.3031 Fax • 919 • 720-1376 Mr.Gary Streed Director of Finance Orange County Sanitation District 108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Dear Gary: I would like to take this opportunity to review events in the bond market during the second quarter and to describe the investment strategy that PIMCO utilized on behalf of the Sanitation District during the period. Finally,I would like to describe PIMCO's current economic outlook and the manner in which our economic outlook,combined with relative value opportunities in the bond market, lead to our investment strategy going forward. Bond Market Review: Concern that the continued health of the U.S.domestic economy would spark inflation and lead the Federal Reserve Board to tighten monetary policy caused interest rates to rise all across the maturity spectrum during the second quarter. U.S. interest rates rose by an average forty basis points in three-month to one-year Treasury bills. Rates rose by an average fifty-three basis points in two-year to ten-year Treasury notes. Rates rose by thirty-four basis points in the longest maturity thirty-year Treasury bond to end the period at 5.96 percent. Not surprisingly,given the dramatic rise in interest rates,the bond market turned in relatively poor performance over the period. The Merrill Lynch Govemment(Corporate bond index,the index against which PIMCO is measured for the Sanitation District's long-term portfolio, returned 0.22 percent for the quarter. (The 0.22 percent total return is the sum of the price return on the bonds in the index and the coupon return of the bonds in the index.) The increase in yields,which occurred over the period,led to a negative price return for the index of-1.269 percent. The coupon income of 1.497 percent for the index offset the price losses and led to the 0.22 percent total return for the period. As you recall,the Merrill index is made up of all existing Treasury bonds with maturities between one and five years,all agencies bonds with maturities between one and five years,and all investment-grade corporate bonds of the same maturities. The index is created on a market-value weighted basis so that Treasuries represent sixty-one percent of the index,agencies represent approximately fifteen percent of the index,and corporate bonds represent twenty-four percent of the index. Returns vary by security type. In the second quarter,for example,the total return of the Treasury component of the index was 0.26 percent return. The total return of the agency and corporate component of the index were 0.31 and 0.15 percent,respectively. Pacific Investment Management Company is a general partnership whose partners are PIMCO Management Inc.and PIMCQ Advisors LY Mr.Gary Streed Orange County Sanitation District August 26, 1999 Page Two OCSD's Second Ouarter Return: As an active bond manager,PIMCO has three weapons within its strategic arsenal. The first strategy,duration, is the price sensitivity of the portfolio to changes in interest rates. Because price and yield changes move in opposite directions,we would choose to have an above-index duration posture if we forecasted a decline in interest rates. Likewise,we would choose to have a below-index duration posture if we forecasted an increase in interest rates. (Our duration strategy in the OCSD-Long term portfolio is limited to+/- .45 years around the index.) The second strategy,curve or maturity mix, involves investing more heavily in that segment of the yield curve that is expected to outperform. If,for example,PIMCO's outlook called for interest rates to decline more extensively in two-to-five year maturities than in other segments of the yield curve,we would invest more heavily in the intermediate segment of the curve. The final strategy,sector/issue selection,involves overweighting or underweighting a sector of the bond market. If,for example, PIMCO expected investment-grade corporates to outperform Treasuries, we would overweight the corporate sector. The extent of our overweight or underweight is limited by our desire to preclude any single strategy from significantly impacting return in the event that our outlook is wrong. During the second quarter,PIMCO's strategy for the OCSD Long-Term portfolio was to have a slightly longer-than-index duration posture in expectation of a modest decline in yields. Our duration was never more than 0.15 years above the duration of the index so that the cost of this strategy in terms of performance was less than five basis points. Our curve strategy was to have a broader-than-index exposure to maturities across the yield curve. This posture was modestly positive as rates rose the most in one to five year maturities. Finally,our sector strategy was to have greater-than-index exposure to agency debentures,corporate bonds and mortgage securities. For example,we held sixteen percent in agency securities rather than the fifteen percent represented in the index. We also held thirty-two percent in corporates securities as opposed to the twenty-four percent represented in the index. Finally,we held eighteen percent of mortgage securities that have no weighting in the Merrill 1-5 government/corporate index. While our decision to overweight agency securities proved positive,our sector strategy detracted from performance overall. The yield advantage to Treasuries available through corporates and mortgages failed to offset the price losses on these securities as credit spreads widened slightly over the period. The net result of our strategies over the quarter was to achieve a A percent total return underperforming the index by A percent. Clearly,while we strive to outperform the index every quarter,our true value is longer-term in nature. Since inception of our relationship,PIMCO has outperformed the index by 29 basis points on an annualized basis. Outlook andSdaleev: During our secular forum that occurred in May, PIMCO shifted our long-term outlook to neutral from our previous bullish stance and expect 30-year Treasury yields to remain within a 5 percent to 6.5 percent band over the next three years. Inflation will remain new 2 percent. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY ,j Mr. Gary Streed Orange County Sanitation District August 26, 1999 Page Three Outlook and StrateEV: (Continued) The 17-year bull market in bonds, during which Treasury yields plunged from more than 15 percent in 1981 to below 5 percent last year, occurred within an environment of economic growth, rising productivity and disinflation driven by the spread of capitalism worldwide. There are now fewer countries left to embrace capitalism, and we do not see other major economic, political or social trends that will drive rates much below the bottom of our secular range. Meanwhile, disinflationary, forces such as global excess capacity and productivity enhancements created by new technologies will limit rate increases. Our range-bound interest rate forecast is based on the view that forces of deflation and inflation are roughly in balance: • The global economy is safer than last year,when weak Asian economies,currency devaluations and falling commodity prices raised the specter of global deflation. • Fiscal stimulus and more than 300 separate central bank emings calmed financial markets and produced signs of recovery in Japan and several Pacific Rim countries. • Global reflation is unlikely due to excess supply and structural impediments to growth in Europe and Japan. • Inflexible labor markets in Europe will prevent assimilation of growth-producing new technologies,while Japan's high savings rates will frustrate fiscal and monetary stimulus. • The direction and momentum of the U.S.stock market will strongly influence our forecast. If recent gains in stocks continue,enhanced consumer confidence will lead to faster growth. A stronger economy would induce the Fed to tighten and push interest rates toward the top of our range. Economic expansion will continue,though at a slower pace,as higher interest rates reduce growth in consumer and investment spending. While the Fed may tighten further to help cool the economy, the central bank will not embark on a protracted series of rate hikes such as last occurred in 1994. Compared to 1994, real interest rates are higher, inflation is lower and recent monetary stimulus has been less substantial. Inflation will trend upward due to a leveling off of commodity prices after recent declines, but global excess capacity and technology-driven productivity gains will limit these increases. Moderating growth and relatively low inflation will keep interest rates near current levels over the next few months, making yield more important than price movement in determining portfolio returns. Prudent alternatives for generating extra yield include: premiums from written options; securities with embedded options such as mortgages;and higher-quality below-investment grade PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY j Mr.Gary Streed Orange County Sanitation District August 26, 1999 Page Four Outlook and Stratepy: (Continued) and emerging market bonds. (We do not use options, below investment-grade securities or emerging market bonds in the OCSD portfolios.) In terms of the OCSD Long-Term portfolio, we will embark upon a slightly greater-than-index duration posture as opportunities allow. Recent rate moves have pushed yields to near to the top of our secular range. The duration extension will be extremely modest as we anticipate only a modest decline in yields. In terms of our curve strategy,we will maintain our broader-than-index posture as this allows us to minimize exposure to the segment of the curve most impacted by changes in monetary policy. In terms of sector, we will maintain our weighting to the mortgage sector anticipating that the yield enhancement available through these securities will allow us to add to total portfolio return. We will add to short-maturity corporate holdings to take advantage of the yield enhancement potential available in these bonds while avoiding significant price deterioration in the event that corporate spreads widen further. Our minimal overweight of agency debentures will also be maintained given their narrow yield advantage to Treasuries. Gary, I hope this information proves useful. I look forward to chatting with you in the near future. Sincerely, 2 Rita J. Seymour Vice President RJS:ci Copy: Steve Kozak Joseph Fournier PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY FAHR COMMITTEE M ngDate TO ad.ofDir. 09/08/99 09/22/99 AGENDA REPORT IDem Number Ihm NumOer FMR99-68 14(e1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Prepared by: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: COMPLETION OF J. D. EDWARDS FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Purchase of New Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) as complete. SUMMARY Staff has implemented the following applications from the J. D. Edwards World classic proprietary software: general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable and cash receipts, fixed assets, job cost, budgeting, payroll, human resources, purchasing, inventory and warehousing, sales order, and address book. All of the functionality required of these applications as specified within the original request for proposals has been provided. After further analysis of the software, the contract management application was not implemented due to the relatively low value of benefits expected to be received. Implementation costs to date are within the original contract award to J. D. Edwards, IBM, and Enterprise Technologies of$1.485 million. Migration to the J. D. Edwards OneWorld client/server software has not been completed. To date, approximately $152,000 has been incurred in Enterprise Technology consulting services for OneWorld migration out of a total budget of $163,000 with few productive benefits being obtained. These costs are primarily due to addressing OneWorld software shortcomings and are amounts paid to Enterprise Technology while attempting to make the software operational. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Total Board approval for the purchase of the hardware, software and implementation of the financial information system through IBM, J. D. Edwards, and Enterprise Technology was $1,485,000. No additional funds are being requested with this action. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) N:ewau`pwr\mMa Her Rgws\loweab Aperq n.pau`uroaanmi INq.aec R~ 1�7 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION At the July 24, 1996 meeting, the Joint Board of Directors authorized the General t Manager to execute a contract for a new financial information system with J. D. Edwards and approved the purchase of the hardware from the California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS)for a combined amount not to exceed $1,485,000. At the February 11, 1998 FAHR Committee Meeting, the Committee approved the assignment of the implementation portion of the financial information system contract for the remaining software applications consisting of fixed assets, contract management, and inventory management, and for the conversion to the J. D. Edwards OneWorld operating platform to Enterprise Technologies, because J. D. Edwards could no longer provide a local client implementation project manager and implementation team. This assignment was made without increasing the original $1,485,000 approved by the Board for the purchase of the hardware, software, and implementation of the financial information system through IBM and J. D. Edwards. To date, hardware, software, and implementation costs have totaled $1,479,000. Implementation of the various applications were completed as follows: Projected Completion Date Actual Phase Applications As of October 1996 Completion Date Phase I Payroll/H.R. Benefits January 1, 1997 January 3, 1997 Budgeting February 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 Phase II General Ledger July 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 Accounts Payable " Cash Receipts/Acccunts Receivable " Fixed Assets February 1, 1998 Phase III Purchasing September 30, 1997 November 1, 1997 Inventory Management-Phase I-Admin. " Inventory Management-Phase II-08M Not Originally Identified March 1, 1998 Job Cost July 1, 1997 Contract Management Not Completed Phase IV One World Conversion/Migration June 30, 1998 Not Completed The assignment of the implementation services to Enterprise Technologies resulted in a consulting service agreement with Enterprise Technologies, for time and materials, in an amount not to exceed $276,000 that expired on August 1, 1999. Through July 31, $274,383 had been expended against this service agreement, as follows: v+.mw�aMmso,m nvam aamm++vsa s"ab�ve.aa aev�'oaeahem+afel aoc Page 2 ' Enterprise Technologies Estimated Project Costs Incurred Budget Budget To Date World Installation: Inventory $ 3,000 $ 5,500 Purchasing 10.375 15,875 Sales Order 23,000 28,198 Fixed Assets 14,000 16,388 Contract Management 10,000 GUAR/AP Support 4.000 15.015 Project Management 18,520 29,890 Data Conversion 11,719 11,800 Project Contingency 19,000 Total World 113,614 122,666 OneWorld Installation: Specific Consulting123,543 151,717 Project Contingency 39,500 Total OneWorid 163,043 151 717 Grand Total $276,657 $274,383 Implementation of the Contract Management module was not completed because the functionality of the J. D. Edwards World system was developed to meet the needs of the private sector. The module lacked the functionality to properly monitor contracts in accordance with the purchasing requirements of the State of California Government and Public Contract Codes, as well as the District's internal purchasing policies. Instead, Purchasing staff has developed a computer program within Microsoft Access that monitors contracts, insurance, and procurement bond requirements with internal resources. Migration to the J. D. Edwards OneWorld client/server software has not been completed because the software has not matured to the paint that it can be installed efficiently while retaining all of the functionality currently available in the installed World classic software applications. To date, approximately$152,000 has been incurred in Enterprise Technology consulting services for OneWorld migration, out of a total budget of $163,000, with only the OneWorld Accounts Receivable module being placed into production. These costs are primarily due to addressing OneWorld software shortcomings and are amounts paid to Enterprise Technology for attempting to make the software operational. In our agreement with J. D. Edwards, we purchased the World classic software, all of the functionality required within our original request for proposal, and the right to migrate to the OneWorld software. At the time we negotiated the software license agreement, J. D. Edwards was making no assurances as to functionality of the OneWorld software. Staff recommended J. D. Edwards because of their established World product, the cost difference to the second proposal, and the urgent need to upgrade the District's outmoded 1979 system. We advised the Board that no governmental OneWorld Kb .ft,w NA Rq 11M Bo Age n.wa�ufel ac R„ . 10 Page 3 installations were complete, and that there was some uncertainty about the ultimate development of the project. Excerpts from the recommendation presentation are attached. Enterprise Technologies has submitted a proposal to complete the migration of the Financial Suite of applications (General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Fixed Assets, Job Cost, and Budget) to OneWorld at an estimated additional cost of$96,000. However, this proposal is based on time and materials without any assurances that additional funds won't be needed. No firm dollar estimate can be provided at this time for completing the OneWorld Distribution Suite (Purchasing, Warehousing and Inventory, and Sales Order) or the OneWorld Human Resource/Payroll Suite. The benefits lost by not completing the migration to OneWorld include: • The OneWorld software is more user-friendly, especially to those users outside of the Finance Department. The OneWorld software resembles a Microsoft product with its point and click, drop down menus, and graphical interface. The World classic software requires IBM keyboard knowledge and the use of function keys. • The OneWorld software provides the District with more alternatives when selecting a hardware platform and an operating platform since the product virtually runs on any hardware platform and will run on an Oracle operating system. • Information within the OneWorld software can more easily be uploaded/downloaded into Microsoft personal computer applications such as Excel and Access. • The OneWorld Software is designed to support e-commerce and will ultimately support web browser access. Ecommerce could provide us the opportunity to pay our vendors electronically. A web browser access would allow employees to complete timesheets on-line that would automatically feed into the payroll module. • Ultimately, J. D. Edwards will be discontinuing support of the World classic software and we may be forced to implement OneWorld or a whole new financial information software package from another vendor. ALTERNATIVES 1) Extend the consulting services agreement with Enterprise Technologies through December 31, 1999, to complete the implementation of the OneWorld Financial Suite applications for time and materials, in an amount not to exceed $96,000. Direct staff to solicit additional consulting service proposals for the implementation of the OneWorld Distribution Suite and Payroll/Human Resource Suite following the completion of the OneWorld Financial Suite implementation. 2) Direct the Information Technology Department to continue to monitor the development of the J. D. Edwards OneWorld software. At some time in the future when the Information Technology Department believes that the software has matured sufficiently to be implemented with few modifications, direct staff to solicit proposals for implementation of the J. D. Edwards OneWorld software. H:Vxp.tlGbpetlaWeN�Rmka Re,wLL11Ba3 PmE Igerda Re�atiWf/dJlem 1Rfe)E¢ ReAUJ_ 1� 7 Page 4 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Excerpts from FIS selection presentation to FAHR Committee GGS:MWD:Ic w�..pammw��.m r,w�Amaa�+we m.m noe�a.RepomNe»+bm iaPo)ao� Page 5 +Mitting Vendors ♦ Bi-Tech (Chico, CA) ♦ JD Edwards (Denver, CO) ♦ Pentamation (Bethlehem, PA) ♦ PeopleSoft (Walnut Creek, CA) ♦ SCT (Lexington, KY) • BiTech is a vendor going through a platform migration from HP3000/Image to UNWInfonnix. Also going thru an acquisition. Having problems adapting a higher ed product to local gov't— particularly Orange County Transit. • JD Edwards has the largest local gov't installed base of the five. A long standing IBM/AS-400 product now moving to new Client/Server version off of AS400. • Pentamation has no West Coast offices, very casual marketing in this area. Did not aggressively pursue this account, possibly a timing issue, possibly strategic. • PeopleSoft is a fast growing Human Resource system specialist with a relatively new Financial system product suite. They have a large number of commercial (private sector) installations, but are just beginning to penetrate the local government market with no currently operating Califomia sites. • SCT is a consulting company, systems integrator, and software developer with a long history in college/university but with a checkered history in local government. It is an Oracle-based product but targets mostly small to medium accounts. d unary: JD Edwards ♦ IBM AS/400 based solution called `World Vision' ♦ Offered to migrate to their new Client/Server version called `One World' ♦ Good references, high `RESPONSIBILIT'Y' score ♦ Conservative on contractual issues ♦ Carefully studied CSDOC prior to submitting proposal • The IBM AS/400 is the largest installed midrange system in the world • Because AS/400 is considered by most to be a proprietary platform, they have decided to move to an open-system, client/server version of their product called One World. • The question is whether they can tranfer all of their well-developed functional knowledge to a new platform and what the impact of trying to support a huge installed base on the legacy AS/400 platform while migrating the product to an new platform and replicating all of the mature AS/400 features. • Their legal conservatism will mean tough contract negotiations because they do not want to commit to specific contract deliverables. 3 +hical Comparison s � NM•YI,1� 1 -- V • Flexibility The ME and PeopleSoft potential solutions are both speculative at this point. Properly implemented, PS could surpass JDE in functionality, but it would depend on CSDOC's level of effort and commitment of resources. 2D FAHR COMMITTEE Meetln9Dal, T0081 1Dir. o9/oe/99 o9/zz/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR99-69 14(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 401(a) PENSION PLAN MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-17, Amending District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. SUMMARY Effective January 1, 1998, the Board of Directors has approved an "Executive's Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust," more commonly called a 401(a) Plan. The only executive who is eligible to participate in this plan is the General Manager, Don McIntyre. All amounts deposited into this plan are offset by an equal reduction of the General Manager's salary. The Internal Revenue Code has established limits for financial participation in these plans. In this case, the maximum participation is established by the IRC as $30,000 per calendar year. The IRC also requires the amount of participation to be expressed as a percentage of"Participant's Compensation for the Plan Year." Because the plan was finalized well into 1998, and because the General Manager had a specific participation level in mind, the participation percentage was established at 7.55% for 1998. Now that the General Manager's performance review for 1999 has been completed, and his 1999 compensation can be determined, it is appropriate to revise the participation percentage in order to allow the maximum participation. The attached resolution, prepared by General Counsel, modifies the participation percentage to reflect the request of the General Manager. Participation amounts are offset by equal reductions in the salary of the General Manager. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. tine hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) KM ftWeen"P Hie R"y IMB mApe ReparLLMY'8. Am I'M Ex Reeae, y Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the change. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 99-17 GGS:Ic N,.v ao�c•b•ao,m�w�+v.w-+"we m,m.wro+A.oaswwmm,.m� Page 2 L V RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-17 AMENDING DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District, on October 29, 1998, adopted an Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, as authorized by United States Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a); and WHEREAS, Article 4, Section 4.1 of said Plan provides for the District, as Employer, to contribute a fixed percentage of the Participating Employee's compensation to the Plan; and WHEREAS, District desires to change the percentage of its contribution for the current Plan Year. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: Section 41 of Article 4 of the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust is hereby amended to read: '4.1 Employer Contributions—The Employer shall contribute 21.2% of the Participant's Compensation for the Plan Year to the Plan. For this purpose, 'Compensation' shall mean 'Compensation'as defined in Section 2.6 hereof, provided, however, any elective deferrals (as defined in Section 402(g)(3) of the Code), or amounts which are not includible in the gross income of the Employee by reason of Section 125 or 457 of the Code shall not be included in Compensation. Employer contributions shall be paid to the Trustee following the end of the Plan Year for which the contributions are made." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 22, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary FAHR COMMITTEE meenn9 Dare Ta B�Nm 9/B/999/AGENDA REPORT IMmNumWrFA' R9&70 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR FORMER EMPLOYEE, GERALDJONES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Gerald Jones in the amount of $67.50 per hour plus actual travel expenses, for a two-year period in an amount not to exceed $123,500 per year. SUMMARY For several years, the District has been implementing programs aimed at reinventing the way operations are managed. Gerald Jones has been a leader in many critical areas of the reinvention effort including reconciliation of the maintenance database with the asset and tagging information developed by the Reinvention Automation Project, and the planning and scheduling interface with the warehouse, purchasing, maintenance database and the financial database. These projects are at the core of our reinvention efforts as they pertain to running the plants at optimal efficiency. The District has completed one phase of the reinvention program, but there are still at least two years to go until completion. Mr. Jones has decided to retire and move to Las Vegas, however he is willing to continue to work as a professional consultant to help us complete the reinvention work. In Mr. Jones' proposal he would travel to the District every other week and work a four-day workweek (a copy of his proposal is attached). He has proposed an hourly rate of$67.50 plus actual travel expenses. Mr. Jones' current hourly rate plus benefits is $53.85. It is essential that we maintain Mr. Jones' involvement with the project to ensure the project's continuity and schedule are maintained. The alternative would be to use outside consultants at a $140 hourly rate. This recommendation is being brought forward to the Finance and Human Resources Committee because District policy prohibits hiring former employees as consultants for a period of one year from the termination date (see attached policy B80.5.2). However, the FAHR Committee on a case-by-case basis may MM ..N enda�,d n0enaa Repv,4,1RW a 1a Hamm Reryb�14(y).dx R—.ad dense Page 1 waive the prohibitions of this policy if it is determined to be in the District's best interests (BS0.5.5). PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Contract cost approximately$123,500 per year including expenses. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has not been budgeted, but there are sufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Use outside consultants at a $140 hourly rate. 2. Use existing staff to manage the project. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Exhibits A and B M\rq.UbYpMv M A,d.R.a 11. .I1.n Pe�'W .M U(11 d- R. � Page 2 Ex4tEir A r" Orange County Policy Number: B80.00 - Sanitation District Effective Date: October 22, 1997 Subject: EMPLOYMENT OF FORMER Supersedes: EMPLOYEES Approved by: LYt�Yr� 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for employing former employees. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all former employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to employ former employees in accordance with the procedures, provisions and conditions of this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 The General Manager may,with the written approval of the Joint Chairman, employ on a part-time, as-needed basis, a retired staff member when such person possesses knowledge and expertise of unique and particular benefit to the Districts and when the services are required. The length of service performed in any one year shall be limited in accordance with the provisions prescribed by the Orange County Employees'Retirement System(currently 120- day maximum). 5.1.1 Such part-time service shall be compensated at the same current hourly rate of the retired employee's position classification,or if no such classification exists,at a rate not to exceed that paid for the most comparable classification. The refired employee shall not be entitled to receive any benefits otherwise payable to the District employees. In the event any employment under this provision involves work assignments outside of Orange County,the current expense reimbursement policy established for regular employees will apply. Page 1 5.2 If any former employee commences doing business wherein the employee, his/her spouse,or members of his/her immediate family are sole proprietors,or majority or controlling shareholders or owners of a corporation, partnership or other business entity,such business shall not be retained as an Independent contractor or consultant to provide service directly to the Districts for a period of one year after leaving Districts' employment. Thereafter,said business entity shall be allowed to contract with the Districts upon compliance with all resolutions and regulations of the Districts then in effect, relating to the procurement of services. 5.3 If any former employee becomes employed by any firm or business entity in which the former employee, his/her spouse or members of his/her immediate family own less than the majority or controlling Interest in said entity,said entity shall not be prohibited from contracting with the Districts. However,the former employee shall not perform work on Districts'projects for a period of one year after leaving Districts'employment; nor shall such former employee contact Districts'officers or employees for the purpose of attempting to Influence any Districts'decision, Including but not limited to,the award of contract,Issuance of permits, or compromise of administrative civil penalties,for a like period of one year. Said services shall be obtained only in accordance with all rules and procedures of the Districts relating to procurement 5.4 Any Districts'employee who receives an offer of employment or a request to discuss potential employment from any person or business entity performing services for the Districts shall report such contact to his or her immediate supervisor,who shall decide whether any change in assignment is necessary or appropriate while the offer or discussions are pending. 5.5 The prohibkions of this policy may be waived by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Boards of Directors it,on a case-by-case basis, it is determined to be in the best Interests of the Districts to do so. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 2 August 23, 1999 mo MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance FROM: Gerald Jones O & M Maintena ce Manager SUBJECT: Reinvention Project Work Items and Proposed Rates Bob, I have reviewed reinvention work in progress and identified the following projects that have goals and objects associated with them for fiscal year 1999-2000. The goals and objectives have been assigned to the project specialists and supervisory staff in the maintenance divisions. The goals and objectives are subject to change based on schedule changes and have been provided as an attachment to this memorandum. The reinvention projects are an out growth of the work that was completed last fiscal year. A list of the projects follows: ♦ Reconciliation of the CMMS database with the asset and tagging information developed by the Reinvention Automation Project (J-42). • Task analysis on assets in the CMMS database (post reconciliation) ♦ Activity Code and Parts List development for. Identified equipment(post task analysis). • O&M support for equipment tagging project to be implemented through the Reinvention Automation Project (procedures, methods and QA-QC for project). ♦ Planning & Scheduling and Warehouse & Purchasing business interface development. • Planning & Scheduling and CMMS & Financial Information System Integration project (continued development). • Expansion of existing Performance Measurement and Standards reporting. The majority of the projects listed above are in some way dependent on the Reinvention Automation Project schedule. It is also true that O&M support and completion of reinvention work must also stay on schedule to accommodate the work being performed by the Reinvention Automation Project. These interdependencies can be discussed at your convenience. OCSD a P.O.Boa 8127 a Fountain Valley,CA 927284127 a(714)962-2411 - � i Page 2 August 23, 1999 Schedules and milestones for these projects can be provided as required to assist with determining the resource requirements and the duration of each of the work efforts. The schedules and task lists developed to date have been the basis of the attached goals and objectives. I have assigned O&M resources to each of the projects. The resources may have to be reallocated between the projects based on core business and reinvention project priorities. I expect the reinvention process to be completed in approximately three more years. Additional resources will be required in specialty areas of the projects. I have identified five areas that will require these resources. ♦ Mark Esquer will have to contribute some 0&M technical support staff time to assist me with looking at the life cycle replacement program. ♦ Nick Arhontes will have to provide support for flow-charting and policy and procedure development required to complete the equipment rebuild reinvention process. • O&M field personnel to perform task analysis and provide raw data and task information for activity codes and parts lists development. ♦ Consultant Support for formalizing the policy and procedure for the new business practices. • Doug Stewart and the individual that replaces me as the O&M Maintenance Manager must work together to insure that the Reinvention Automation Project and the O&M Reinvention efforts stay on track. The information in this memorandum provides a general overview of the work to be completed. After reviewing the project management requirement and the resources available (eight project specialists) for the project I believe it will take a minimum of half time commitment on my part to effectively manage the process. I would recommend a four day ten hour per day work schedule. The four-day schedule would be Monday through Thursday. I would travel to the Orange County Sanitation District plant sight every other week or as scheduled work activities require my presence. This schedule is consistent with the project specialists assigned to the project and will reduce my travel expenses. I would charge an hourly rate of$67.50 for all on site and off site hours worked. This rate would not include travel The travel expenses for the proposed four-day workweek are approximate) $700.00 p r week. U Bob; if you need any additional information let me know. Attachment GRJ:jmf H:1wp.dta\om1 60NonesW EMCS\RCMOOTEN.doc C: Don McIntyre Blake Anderson . Maintenance Division Goals FY 1999-2000 Objective 1 Reconcile Instrumentation equipment and tagging information from the Reinvention Automation Project (J-42) with CMMS Information for preliminary, primary and secondary treatment plant processes. The reconciled CMMS databases must contain all equipment records for the process area and have all records identified for deletion removed from the database (use defined reconciliation procedures). Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J-42 database for the identified process areas and deliver the databases in a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by December 31, 1999. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J-42 database for the Identified process areas and deliver the databases in a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by November 30,1999. Resources needed: The assistance of the Asset Management Group #1 personnel and the CMMS Support Group. Objective 2 Reconcile instrumentation equipment and tagging information from the Reinvention Automation Project(J42)with CMMS Information for digestion process areas at both plant facilities and the effluent pumping process at plant 2. The reconciled CMMS databases must contain all equipment records for the process area and have all records Identified for deletion removed from the database(use defined reconciliation procedures). Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J42 database for the process areas which have been Identified and deliver the databases in a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by March 31,2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J42 database for the identified process areas and deliver the databases in a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by February 28,2000. The reconciled CMMS databases must contain all equipment records for the process area and have all records Identified for deletion removed from the database (use defined reconciliation procedures). Resources needed: The assistance of the Asset Management Group #1 personnel and the CMMS Support Group. Continued Section 5. Future Performance Objectives (Continued) a Objective 3 Reconcile instrumentation equipment and tagging Information from the Reinvention Automation Project (J-42) with CMMS Information for the Central-Generation facilities and plant utilities at both plant facilities. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J-42 database for the identified process areas and deliver the databases In a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by June 30,2000, Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the reconciliation of the CMMS database with the J42 database for the identified process areas and deliver the databases in.a spreadsheet format to Maintenance supervision by May 31,2000. Resources needed: The assistance of the Asset Management Group #1 personnel and the CMMS Support Group. Objective 4 Provide QAIQC for the Equipment Tagging Project associated with the Reinvention Automation Project. Duties will Include verification of the installation of tags for the equipment in each process area of the plant facilities. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the OA/QC of the Instrumentation equipment for each of the plant process areas within 45 days after the last tags have been Installed. To verify QAIQC has been completed provide a spreadsheet that Identifies-the process area equipment and the date the field Installation of the tags was verified. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the QAIQC of the instrumentation equipment for each of the plant process areas within 15 days after the last tags have been Installed. To verify CA/QC has been completed provide a spreadsheet that identifies the process area equipment and the date the field Installation of the tags was verified. Resources needed: The assistance with project oversight by Dale Brooks and the other members of the Asset Management Group#1. Continued -Objective 5 Working with the Planning & Scheduling and Warehouse& Purchasing Users Group expand the f existing project plan to define the tasks required and approach to be taken to reclassify inventory,standardize nomenclature and determine where equipment and parts cross- referencing information should reside. 4 Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the task definition and the approach to be taken to reclassify inventory, standardize nomenclature and determine where equipment and parts cross-referencing will reside by September 30, 1999. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the task definition and the approach to be taken to reclassify inventory,standardize nomenclature and determine where equipment and parts crass-referencing will reside by August 31, 1999. Resources needed: Assistance of assigned project specialists, maintenance supervisors, purchasing personnel and warehouse personnel in completing the planning process. Objective 6 Working with the P&S and W&P Users Group, develop a process that defines how the O&M planning and scheduling process will function with warehouse and purchasing, Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete development of a process flow chart and responsibility table defining the required steps and responsible party for each step in the process by December 31, 1999. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete development of a process flow chart and responsibility table defining the required steps and responsible party for each step in the process by November 30, 1999, Resources needed: Assistance of assigned project specialists, maintenance supervisors, purchasing personnel and warehouse personnel in completing the planning process. Continued Section 5. Future Performance Objectives (Continued) Objective 7 Complete the testing of the planning and scheduling module for functionality. - Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the testing of the planning and scheduling module in the CMMS by September 30, 1999. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the testing of the planning and scheduling module in the CMMS by August 31, 1999. Resources needed: Assistance of the CMMS Support Group and I.T. Department as required to review the module. Objective 8 As a member of the Asset Management Group#2 develop the maintenance planning and scheduling program. The development will be under the direction of the Maintenance Division supervision and subject to their review. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the development of the planning and scheduling program for fourth quarter Implementation by March 31,2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the development of the planning and scheduling program for fourth quarter implementation by February 28,2000. Resources needed: Asset Management Group#2 will provide timely development for review by maintenance supervision. Maintenance supervision will provide prompt review in support of the development process. Section 5. Future Performance Objectives (Continued) Objective 9 Implement the planning and scheduling program for the preliminary and primary treatment plant process areas at both plant facilities. - Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Implement the planning and scheduling program as defined by June 30, 2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Implement the planning and scheduling program as defined by May 31,2000. Resources needed: The maintenance divisions must complete the detailed task analysis and develop the parts list for the preliminary treatment and primary treatment process areas to facilitate the program Implementation. Objective 10 Setup a file system that will accommodate approximately three thousand (3000) O&M manual data forms,with the associated tables of contents,with a total sheet count of approximately ten thousand (10,000). Arrange data forms by the engineering projectjob number and in the proper sequence. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the project by June 30,2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the project by March 31, 2000. Resources needed: Assistance of the Office Technician (Moira Sullivan) and the assigned project specialist(Dale Brooks). Continued ,c Section 5. Future Performance Objectives (Continued) ` Objective 11 Write a policy and procedure handbook for the O&M Library system. The policy and procedure handbook will Include criteria for book placement,book appearance, proper database operation and proper database use. Also Integrate the equipment tag data collection procedure into the handbook. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the policy and procedure handbook for the O&M Library system by June 30,2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the policy and procedure handbook for the O&M Library system by March 31,2000. Resources needed: Assistance of consultant with writing draft handbook. Objective 12 Develop and Implement the O&M Library database system. Support the Information Technology group In the development of the Web based client Interface for check in and check out capabilities. Increase the repository of data entries to 2700 during fiscal year 1999-2000,with a minimum of 500 data entries being completed in the first quarter. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the 2700 data entries by June 30,2000 Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the 2700 data entries by March 31,2000. Resources needed: Assistance of the Office Specialist(Moire Sullivan) Project Specialist(Dale Brooks)and the assigned Information Technology group personnel. Objective 13 Perform a detailed analysis of the equipment level maintenance tasks for the Instrumentations and electrical equipment In the preliminary, primary and secondary treatment plant processes. 1 The evaluation will be subject to following the criteria established for the managed malatenance program. The work will Include verifying codes, verifying maintenance strategy, determining maintenance Interval, establishing task time and Identifying the need for activity codes and parts lists. Equipment requiring maintenance will then be scheduled Into the annual maintenance program Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the analysis of the Identified equipment for preliminary treatment by September 30, 1999, analysis of primary treatment by December 31, 1999 and secondary treatment by March 31, 2000. Provide a spreadsheet listing the equipment,results of the analysis and the maintenance schedule determined. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the analysis of the Identified equipment for preliminary treatment by August 31, 1999, analysis of primary treatment by November 30, 1999 and secondary treatment by February 28, 2000. Provide a spreadsheet listing the equipment,results of the analysis and the maintenance schedule determined. Resources needed: Joe Tucker and Asset Management Group #1 will deliver reconciled databases for each process area Identified at the beginning of the fiscal year quarter that they are due for analysis. Any deviation of the schedule will result in shifting due dates by the appropriate time frame. Objective 14 Develop or modify the activity codes and parts lists for the Instrumentation and electrical equipment in the preliminary and primary treatment processes that were identified during the maintenance task analysis. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the activity codes and parts lists for the subject equipment and enter them Into the CMMS by June 30,2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the activity codes and parts lists for the subject equipment and enter them into the CMMS by April 30,2000. Resources needed: Joe Tucker and Asset Management Group #1 will deliver reconciled databases for each process area Identified at the beginning of the fiscal year quarter that they are due for analysis and the analysis must be completed on schedule. Any deviation of the schedule will result in shifting due dates by the appropriate time frame. W Continued II ' Y Objective 15 Complete the field walk-down with the J-42 consultants and review loop drawings for the preliminary,primary,secondary,digestion,effluent pumping, central generation and utilities at both plant facilities. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete the walk-down and loop drawing reviews for the preliminary, primary and secondary facilities at both plants by September 30, 1999. Complete the walk-down and loop drawing reviews for digestion at both plant facilities and effluent pumping at plant 2 by March 31,2000. Complete the walk down and loop drawing reviews for the central generation facilities and utilities at both plant facilities by June 30, 2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete the walk-down and loop drawing reviews for the preliminary, primary and secondary facilities at both plants by August 31,1999. Complete the walk-down and loop drawing reviews for digestion at both plant facilities and effluent pumping at plant 2 by February 28, 2000. Complete the walk down and loop drawing reviews for the central generation facilities and utilities at both plant facilities by May 31,2000. Resources needed: The engineering department and Reinvention Automation Project(J42) consultant must stay on schedule or the time frames to provide assistance will be adjusted as required to support the new project schedule. Objective 16 Provide personnel to support the Y2K effort. The support will include personnel for contingency planning,re-medlation,work-around and testing of Imbedded systems and continuous evaluation of newly purchased equipment to ensure Y2K compliance. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Complete contingency planning support by September 30,1999. Complete Imbedded systems work and testing for the plant process and pump station equipment by December 31,1999. Complete the evaluation and documentation of newly purchased equipment to determine If it is Y2K compliant by March 31, 2000. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Complete contingency planning support by August 31, 1999. Complete imbedded systems work and testing for the plant process and pump station equipment by November 30, 1999. Complete the evaluation and documentation of newly purchased equipment to determine if it is Y2K compliant by February 28,2000. Resources needed: Direction and support of Y2K O&M project manager and Y2K consultant. Continued ^ uu1 Section 5. Future Performance Objectives (Continued) 0 Objective 17 Assist Safety and Emergency Response Division with the Hazardous Energy Control procedure development. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: Assist Safety and Emergency Response personnel and the consultant with development of lockout and tagout procedures. Complete 75 procedures each quarter In the Mechanical division. Work with the CMMS Support Group to ensure procedures are properly entered into CMMS each quarter. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: Assist Safety and Emergency Response personnel and the consultant with development of lockout and tagout procedures. Complete 100 procedures each quarter in the Mechanical division. Work with the CMMS Support Group to ensure procedures are properly entered Into CMMS each quarter. Resources needed: Division personnel under the direction of front line supervision will provide necessary technical Input to the lockout and tagout procedures. Safety and Emergency Response and consultant will develop final draft documents. The CMMS Support Group will provide resources to enter the templates Into the CMMS database. Objective 18 Provide the oversight necessary to ensure that the Instrumentation/Electrical Division Budget remains within projected limits for fiscal year 1998/99. Measurement Standards for Meets Expectations: The Instrumentation/Electrical Division overall budget will fall within the fiscal year 1998/99 bottom line number. Measurement Standards for Exceeds Expectations: No more than two single line Items of the Instrumentation/Electrical Division budget with a total budget amount in excess of$2,000 for fiscal year 1998199 shall exceed the budgeted amount by more than ten percent while maintaining overall budget within fiscal year 1998/99 limits. Resources needed: The Instrumentation/Electrical Division Supervision must work together to ensure line item expenditures are properly posted and review of line Item status must be completed on a regular basis to ensure errors are not included when costs are posted by finance. \lradonldatailwp.dta\om1990gonaslPRIVATMFV1999-2000 Gcalswalnt.Goals 1999-2000.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS WmngDx I Toed.ofDir. 09/27 99 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe I rem Number an) Orange County Sanitation Distract FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: POLICY REGARDING REFUND AND CREDIT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of request by Director Gullixson to have staff, General Counsel and the FAHR Committee reevaluate and conduct further studies relating to granting refunds to Yorba Linda (and other areas) property owners of sewer service charges paid by property owners for parcels not connected to the District's system. SUMMARY Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated September 15, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS General Counsel's Memo dated 9/15/99 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 24, 1999, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on August 24, 1999. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors John Collins, Vice Chairman, Norman Eckenrode, Peer Swan, and General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alternate; OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony, Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr., and Iry Pickler, Chairman. OCWD Alternate member General Manager Mills was not in attendance. OCSD General Counsels Thomas L. Woodruff and Brad Hogin, and OCWD General Counsel Clark Ide were present. Staff attending were Tom Dawes, GWR System Project Manager; OCSD staff: Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli, Planning Manager Jim Herberg, Director of O&M Bob Ooten, Director of Finance Gary Streed, and Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman. OCWD staff: Associate General Manager John Kennedy, Senior Engineer Greg Leslie, Engineering Manager Mike Markus, Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth, Administrative Assistant Jill Everhart, and Recording Secretary Judy-Rae Karlsen. Others in attendance included OCWD Directors Kelly Rowe, Jerry King, Wes Bannister, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. staff: Kellene Burn-Lucht and Dick Corneille; and Brenda Deeley representing Nelson Communications Group. 1 . Minutes of previous meeting Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held August 12, 1999 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1 . Status Report (Discussion of this item was advanced on tonight's agenda) GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes provided a status update on the following Grant proposals: California Water Resources Planning Grant, California Energy Commission Research Grant, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant. Mr. Dawes provided a list of potential expenditures affecting the GWR System budget. The Committee concurred with his recommendations for the following expenditures: • Issuance of a Task Order to RMW Contractors not to exceed the amount of $15,000 (rather than the $25,000 to $40,000 originally estimated) to assist with the Bureau of Reclamation's additional Cultural Resources requirements. • Issuance of Request for Proposals for an Ultra Violet (UV) specialist to assist with acquiring Department of Health Services approval and certification of UV disinfection equipment. Consultant Reports: Brenda Deeley of Nelson Communications Group presented a summary of public relations activities; and Kellene Burn-Lucht of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. reported on the August 12 meeting of the Technical Advisory Team Captains and the Management Advisory Team and noted that the Management Advisory Team will be meeting on Wednesday, September 22, 1999. 2. GWRS Project Governance GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes provided an in-depth analysis of governance options for Committee review. He reviewed and clarified the financial status of both Districts and outlined projected GWR System goals for each District. Following discussion, Chairman Pickler directed staff to draft a comprehensive operating agreement and procedure manual defining daily operational/governance issues that will satisfy the requirements of both Districts and requested that this item be agendized for discussion in October. 3. Directors Comments It was the consensus of the Committee to review the publicity piece, which aired on the COX television channel entitled, "The water is good, you can drink it." Staff was directed to obtain a copy of the videotape for Board review prior to the next GWR System Joint Committee meeting. Dr. Leslie was commended for his performance in the documentary. Director Anthony announced that Director Swan was recently elected to the Metropolitan Water District Board of Directors. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for September 28, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date T0013d gr. g/zz sg AGENDA REPORT Item NumO Rem umtw 7� Orange County Sanitation District / FROM: David LudvJ Diltor of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize Environmental Science Associates to prepare and circulate the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan in compliance with CEQA requirements. SUMMARY Since 1989, the District has been operating under the 1989 Master Plan Program Environmental Impact Report. The recently completed Strategic Plan developed a revised operational plan and capital improvement program through 2020. A draft program EIR (DEIR) has been prepared for the Strategic Plan as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The DEIR public review and comment period was from June 23, 1999 through August 16, 1999. A public hearing was held in conjunction with the July 21, 1999 Board meeting. Three members of the public addressed the Board at the hearing. Written comments were received from 23 individuals, interest groups, and public agencies. Staff is seeking authorization to prepare and circulate the final program EIR (FEIR) for the Strategic Plan, including responses to all comments received in writing and at the public hearing. Certification of the FEIR by the Board of Directors is scheduled for October 27, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) cxgae.npwa,onn n.pw.wm m.,sy.wu+uaw.eec R. MWoe Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following is a overview of the Strategic Plan EIR process: Circulation of Notice of Preparation October 1997 Advisory Committee (PAC 2) Workshop June 17, 1999 Board Workshop June 19, 1999 Board Authorization for Circulation of Draft EIR June 23, 1999 Draft EIR Public Review Period June 29—August 16, 1999 Public Hearing July 21, 1999 Board Authorization for Preparation of Final EIR September 22, 1999 Final EIR Distribution October 5, 1999 EIR Certification October 27, 1999 Staff and Consultants will prepare responses to all public comments upon Board authorization to prepare the FEIR. Prior to finalizing the FEIR for public circulation, the Ad Hoc Committee Re Strategic Plan will review the public comments on the DEIR and proposed responses to be included in the FEIR. Resolutions for certification of the FEIR will be prepared and reviewed by General Counsel. The FEIR is scheduled for circulation to the public on October 5, 1999. Board members will receive copies of the complete Final EIR for review prior to the October 27, 1999 meeting. The FEIR consists of the DEIR togetherwith an attachment containing responses to public comments. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the FEIR be circulated to the public for a minimum of 10 days prior to Certification. ALTERNATIVES Not approving preparation of the FEIR. If preparation of the FEIR is not authorized, new projects identified by the Strategic Plan that were not included in the 1989 Master Plan EIR would be delayed and incur additional costs for preparation of individual EIRs or Negative Declarations. CEQA FINDINGS Board certification of the Strategic Plan FEIR is scheduled for October 1999. ATTACHMENTS None G NIpIOGMpenOa aaM1 PeprtaVnnl6 aiGaYd61 B]]6U.J¢ aa„a. . Page 2 17 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date Toatl.of Dir. 9-22-99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item umber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud tor of Engineering Originator: Jim Harris, Project Manager SUBJECT: HIGH PRESSURE COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-61 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to R. Fox Construction, Inc. for High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61,for an amount not to exceed $201,700. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Job No. P2-61 were completed in May 1999. The project designer was Hilbert & Associates. The current engineer's estimate is $210,000 and the budget is $260,500. This project will replace existing plant air compressors that have reached the end of their useful mechanical life. Maintenance staff installed the compressors in the early 1970's. Due to the age of the equipment, maintenance staff can no longer repair or support the equipment due to the lack of spare parts. This design includes the installation of two new high efficiency compressors, associated piping, and support equipment. This project will reduce overall electrical and water consumption, compressor maintenance costs, and increase the life of equipment throughout the facilities. On August 24, 1999 six bids were received ranging from $253,544 to the low bid of$201,700 submitted by R. Fox Construction, Inc. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to R. Fox Construction, Inc. Construction completion is scheduled for April 2000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The Board is being asked to authorized $201,700 for the construction contract, $86,032 for Construction Inspection Staff, and $75,000 for programming support and implementation by Process Control Integration Staff. G.WooE endaG ft Rep Ui nl9 rds12E194S990M ReN . W010 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section a,page 10) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In the early 1970's, the District's Maintenance staff purchased and installed two used reciprocating air compressors at Plant No. 2. The plant air system is critical for providing compressed air for process control, instrumentation, tools, and other miscellaneous uses. The equipment has provided many years of service, but due to its age and the lack of spare parts, the Maintenance staff can no longer keep the equipment available. The primary concern is the compressors are introducing water and oil into the air system and are fouling instrumentation and other equipment causing excessive use of staff time to clean and repair critical systems. Currently, the plant air compressors are out of service. Maintenance staff has rented two temporary compressors to serve the plant. The new design will remove the existing obsolete equipment and provide a new permanent facility. A secondary problem is the one time use of plant water for cooling the existing equipment. The water is then wasted to drain and returned to the plant process. This is a waste of water and energy. The new compressors and dryers are designed to be self-contained and have no need for exterior cooling. In December 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Hilbert& Associates to design the compressor replacement. This project is the first design provided by this consultant. The completed design includes the use of high efficiency screw type compressors, strainers, and air dryers to preclude contamination of the plant air system. On August 24, 1999 six bids were received ranging from $253,544 to the low bid of$201,700 submitted by R. Fox construction, Inc., based in Tustin. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to R. Fox Construction, Inc. Construction completion is scheduled for April 2000. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives. G:MyWYVgvgad Wy nl BOMA 41 0339BAx aemw: eaGm Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS The project includes the replacement of existing equipment and was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19,1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation JRH.,jo:jak G:M�o0B�4pQEe PN FepM1NGrM1&wEf1P16t&33AB<rc ermm Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE HIGH PRESSURE COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-61 �.`s'ORIGINALI�� "CURRENT' `PROPOSED PROPOSED' , °FUNDS.-' 7 THIS ' " PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED IP[tO,I TFTASIC t :AUTHORIZED. PROJECT' BUDGET. REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION 'TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED IVY, 't Fd„ BUDGET: ' BUDGEf'" INCREASE. BUDGET-; TODATE � •REQUEST -I . AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%). Project Development $ 1.310 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 $ 1.310 $ 460 35% Design Staff $ 37.760 $ 37,760 $ 37,760 $ 37.760 $ 37,760 $ 10,000 26% Consultant PSA $ 55,000 $ 55.000 $ 55.0001 $ 42,990 $ 42.990 $ 42.000 98% Construction Contract $ 260.500 $ 260,500 $ 200.500 $ 201,700 $ 201,700 0% Construction Other $ 751000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75.000 $ 75,000 0% Construction Stag $ 88032 $ 86,032 $ 86,032 $ 86,032 $ 86,032 $ 2.590 0% Contingency $ 44,398 $ 44398 $ 44398 $ 0% TOTAL $ 500.000 $ 660,000 $ - $ 560,000 1 $ 82,060 $ 362,732 $ 444,792 $ 55,050 12% Kl pxltalengU=S S CONTRACTSWM14AR Cmwty lw Bid Budget TaelexlatDicldcta August 24, 1999 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION High Pressure Compressed Air System at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-61 Engineers Estimate: $210,000 Construction Contract Budget: $260,500 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. R. Fox Construction, Inc. $ 201,700 2. Margate Construction, Inc. $ 213,300 3. S.S. Mechanical Corp. $ 222,996 4. MMC Inc. $ 224,101 5. Olsson Construction $ 227,900 6. Kovaleff Mechanical Services, Inc. $ 253,544 7. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to R. Fox Construction, Inc., in the bid amount of$201,700 as the lowest and best bid. zxjaz�-� David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H:\wp.dlelengVOBS 8 CONTRACTW2-61 kp2-61 Bid Tab doc Revised 05/1W98 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 . Founi in Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 952-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng DMe To Bd.of Dr. s/31ros AGENDA REPORT Rem Number ItemNumbu IB Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Patmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: HUNTINGTON BEACH CLOSURE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 98-21, for purchase orders issued in connection with the Huntington Beach closure for Investigation of Coast Trunk Siphon (Specification No. P-188), in an amount not exceed $455,000. SUMMARY This item is a notification of the General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 98-21 for Purchase Orders in Excess of$100,000 each. Three Purchase Orders in excess of$100,000 were issued to Contractors to support the beach closure incident. The Purchase Orders were issued with "not to exceed" amounts as the magnitude of the work to complete the investigation was not known at the time when the work began. These purchase orders were issued under sole source agreements due to the events surrounding the beach closure and the concern for safety hazards to the general public (high coliform counts). Securing multiple vendor bids, purchase approval and processing, installation, cleaning and testing of the sewer lines could not be completed by normal methods in time to support the wide scale investigation requirements. The afore mentioned were considered emergency items and have been approved by the General Manager. All work associated with the three purchase orders are expected to be completed by the end of September 1999. A summary of the Purchase Orders follows. Purchase Orders Description of Purchase Order Purchase Order (Vendors) Amount Jamison Engineering . Testing of State Beach sewers $200,000 . Hydrotest of siphon . Installation by bypass system . Finish cleaning of siphon and confined space entry Sancon Engineering . Heavy siphon cleaning, bucket method $130,000 . Leak Investigation Foothill Engineering . Supervised installation by bypass system $125,000 and Dewatering . Furnish, maintain and monitor four pumps and approximately 1400 feet of 120•inch ie \4Ma,W.alWp.tluYp.A.Vlwm b.Me B.pw.N WG Bum A.-d.R,,. l 1e. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line tlem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In June, 1999 high coliform counts were observed for about a mile of the Huntington State Beach from north of Brookhurst Street to north of Newland Street. As a result, the Orange County Health Care Agency decided to close the beach during the July 41b holiday and beyond. Presently, the County Health Officer has elected to continue posting health advisory signs along approximately 2 1/2 miles of the beach from the Santa Ana River north. To identify the source of the problem, the District investigated the condition of laterals serving the State Beach and the connection to the District trunkline. One break in the State owned line was found and repaired. However, the high bacteria counts remained. Subsequently, the District redirected its investigation efforts to the Coast Trunk Siphon to inspect for possible leaks. Prior to performing a closed circuit Tying of this siphon, Staff had to expend a considerable amount of time cleaning the Coast Trunk Siphon of tons of grit, which required the installation of a bypass pumping system. The investigation results indicated that the Coast Trunk Sewer is not leaking. ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None BP lac 1Ye6anWeblMp.E, gs mf Mftende flepu klMB WAg.M Rec WAwn 18E Homed � Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for he Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on d , 19 9, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on S , 19Py. n/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this�day of Penny M. Kyle,Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H:\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on 6- e.l7 -221— , 19f, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ( GC , 19-112 Z� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of Penny M. KyW, Secretarl Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HA W P.DTMADMMIBS\FORMS\F27 A