Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-07-21 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT July 15, 1999 URGENT "" URGENT •" URGENT '"' URGENT "' URGENT PLEASE NOTE - CHANGE IN MEETING TIMEM 'Mna: (714)962-2411 mNIIM aG2ral Pounean velle81 cn NOTICE OF MEETING 92728-8127 '4 109E`ll;A r. BOARD OF DIRECTORS `°"92 o9--7 a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WEDNESDAY, JULY 21. 1999 - 6:30 P.M. Idea DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 0 10844 Ellis Avenue citlaa Fountain Valley, California 92708 Anahalm Brea The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation 8uene Perk District will be held at the above location, time and dale. Cypress Fountain Valley - F"I rt Garden Gm Grove Huntington Beach Irene Board Secretary La Habra Le Palma Los Alernims Newport Beach Grange Pla`aA Tentatively - Scheduled (Jcomi Meetings sane Ana 8�9 seal seann 9 anon r sun Will; Perk PUBLIC HEARING RE ORDINANCE nrbe L;nea NO. OCSD-09, CAPITAL FACILITIES eoawtr or Orange CAPACITY CHARGES - Wednesday,July 21, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING RE DRAFT PROGRAM ■a"Ito^ oletriote EIR FOR STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, July 21, 1999 at 8:00 p.m. Lode Mo. Midway Dry JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT water olatrleea SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, July 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Ir.ine Ranch JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Thursday,August 12. 1999 at 5:00 p.m. @OCSD COMBINED STEERING COMMITTEE AND AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, August 25, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. -To Protect Me Publm HeaIN and me Fnnronmenp through Excellence in Abr awatar SW-ma- mm BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November "November 17, 1999 December *December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 April April 26, 2000 May May 24. 2000 June June 28, 2000 July July 26, 2000 August August 23, 2000 •Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\Hgenda\1999 Meeting Notices\MN7.2.doc AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JULY 21, 1999— 6:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR 7:00 AND 8:00 P.M. (Agenda Item Nos. 19 & 20) 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 07/21/99 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on June 23, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 06/15/99 06/30/99 Totals $4.548,054.08 $5,996,941.26 CONSENTCALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 9. (1) Receive and file petitions from each of the 44 property owners to annex 39.39 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Lemon Heights (Annexation No. OCSD-4—Haigh Annexation); (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-12, authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District; and (3)Approve Sewer Service Agreement with each of the 44 property owners of Annexation No. OCSD-4—Haigh Annexation. 10. (1) Receive and File Petition for Writ of Mandate, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 811565; and, (2) Authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. 07/21/99 Page 3 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re July 21, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chairwill order the draft Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 23, 1999 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re July 7, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 7, 1999 to be filed. C. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Enterprise Technologies to provide technical and consulting support for the District's Financial Information System (FIS) end-users, in an amount not to exceed $121,200, for a five-month period beginning August 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-13, Supporting a State of California Water Bond Issue Containing Specific Funding Language for the Santa Ana River and Orange County Projects. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re July 1, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES - NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 1, 1999 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order 3 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$110,944 and 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,461,765. d. (1) Approve Amendment No. 3 in the amount of$257,648 to the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for the Relocation and Modification to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for construction costs; and (2) Approve a budget increase of$176,786 for the Relocation and Modifications to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for added construction costs, for a total revised project budget of$2,302,666. 07/21/99 Page 4 e. (1)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with ti Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. JA2, providing for additional miscellaneous services in the amount of $80,537, for a total amount not to exceed $4,480,437; and (2) Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for tagging services in the amount of$616,393, for a total amount not to exceed $5,096,830. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re July 14, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 14, 1999 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of June 1999. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-14, Authorizing the District's Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest District's Funds; Adopting District's Investment Policy Statement and Performance Benchmarks; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-40. e. Item removed from agenda f. 1) Receive and file letter dated June 23, 1999 from Gerald Nichols requesting the District to waive sewer connection fees for himself and three neighbors for four residential homes located in Yorba Linda; 2) Receive and file letter dated July 12, 1999 from Arthur Newsham; 3) Deny the request of Gerald Nichols to waive sewer connection fees for himself and three neighbors for four residential homes located in Yorba Linda; 4) Approve a credit toward capital facilities capacity charges (connection fees) for the four parcels equal to the dollar amount of prior sewer service fees improperly collected, plus interest at a rate equivalent to the 90 day Treasury Bill; 5) Direct staff to: a. Request an updated listing from the Yorba Linda Water District on property addresses not connected to the local sewer system within Revenue Area No. 2; b. Identify those property owners from this listing whose sewer service fee has not already been removed from the County property tax roll, and contact them for verification of information; c. Remove these addresses from the County property tax roll for future sewer service fee billings after receiving confirmation of no connection from the property owners; o7/21/99 Page 5 d. Implement a method to receive connection information from the City so that properties are reinstated to the tax roll when connected. 6) Transfer funds equivalent to the amount determined in 2 above for all parcels improperly charged, in order to provide credits toward capital facility capacity charges for a period of 4 years; 7) Direct staff to develop a program for obtaining information on property addresses throughout the rest of the District boundaries, except for Revenue Area 14, that are also not connected to the local sewer service system and attempt to verify this information with the property owner for the purpose of removing these properties from the County property tax roll to eliminate future service fee billings; 8) Notify all current property owners who are identified as not being connected to the sewer system, but who have paid annual sewer service user fees, that the annual sewer service fee will be removed from future property tax bills so long as they remain unconnected, and that they are entitled to either. a) a credit against capital facilities capacity charges incurred during the next four years, or b) a refund of sewer service fees, plus interest, paid over the previous four years or for as long as they can establish ownership of the parcel, whichever is less. g. 1) Authorize Contracts/ Purchasing Manager to proceed with a pilot procurement card program with selected staff utilizing the American Express procurement card program for a six-month period effective August 1, 1999; and, 2) Authorize the Contracts/ Purchasing Manager to implement a full-scale procurement program if said program suggests benefits of costs savings and staff time. 16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on June 16 and June 21, 1999 to be filed. 17. 1)Approve in concept Resolution No. OCSD 99-_,Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations re contents of Resolution No. OCSD 99-_; and 3) Return to the Board for final adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 99-_with any recommended modifications. 07n1/99 Page 6 18. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-10, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance , No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Permittee Charges for Use: a. Receive and file Staff Report b. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated July 14, 1999 C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-10 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-10, and pass to second reading and public hearing on August 25, 1999. THIS ITEM IS SET TO COMMENCE AT 7:00 P.M. 19. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-04: a. Receive and file report of Staff b. Receive and file report of General Counsel C. Verbal report of General Counsel d. Verbal report of Staff e. Receive and file written comments, if any f. Open hearing g. Close hearing h. Discussion by Board i. Recommended actions 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-04, by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-09, to be effective September 1, 1999. THIS ITEM IS SET TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 20. Consideration of the following actions relative to public review of Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan: a. Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan. b. Receive and file report of General Counsel C. Verbal report of Staff d. Verbal report of General Counsel e. Receive and file written comments, if any f. Open hearing o7nvss • Page 7 g. Close hearing h. Discussion by Board i. Recommended action 1. Continue to the October 27, 1999 Regular Board Meeting for consideration of the Final Environmental Impact Report. 21. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c). 4. Confer with General Counsel re Robert Burge, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 5. Confer with General Counsel re Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 811565 (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 22. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting on21/99 Page 8 23. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 24. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 25. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 \YadonAalalNw Aar gendaSwrd Agendas\l9 Board Agendas`0721W dM ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: July 21, 1999 TIME: 6:30 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................i (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓ �� — (COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................i i (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... a� ezi — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY........................... — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE.....................y ✓ (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. y ✓ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN..:................ ✓ ✓ (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... (WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON................... — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ (MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... . — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ �L — — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. JL ✓ — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... 6Lc Q- — (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. I/ ✓ — — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. �� ✓ — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ �L — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. J/ 1L — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ v — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... ✓ ✓ _ (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... mac — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA.........................✓ �L — (BLAKE).......-----.------..... WALKER....................... ✓ ✓ — — STAFF: Anderson ✓ V t Ghirelli ✓ v Hodges ca McIntyreKyle Ludwin les ✓ �� Miles n ten Pe ✓ u�M Peterman Streed Tuchman G✓ OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus 03/24/99 H:Nap.dlaWdmin0STlRECT0R01rttlom Roll Call.doc SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rJ�dl I qq BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) lcr Pee/11-1 n11;sA 5- D, a. e P J C rol/o Eh i f Si! 4 F /j/,gwsH,q, 6 8,44C, r✓ rna s ESA w� n� �I wA.� L�✓ k— ,,.+ aJF a ��. JF � Q SEf1/3i 1 4-F k4e, zt sc FF �1pa� A\ �AChC: Ccr �puvtdtt HAWRDTAIADMINISSWORMSZIGMN MRM.DOO REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. / . . . . . . nn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 22 REPRESENTING: Se ( y-- (self/name of organization) \trail AatatW.p.dtatadmin\aStFORMSVtequeat to Speak.do REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. IC�� NAME: (please print) M cX..a�cy HOMEADDRESS: -7zi�i� �yra,nlr�JJeW (number/street) 1-Ir a` (-q 'l (city/zip\code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) \4etlonWatalW p.dta%dmin\BS\FORMS\Requant to Speak.doe REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: j AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) C4aljrS /2/'/z::L024 HOME ADDRESS: IO)l A Coffin MA+ mtj (number/street)b (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: .Ctl- f (self/name of organization) NadonWatai Wp.dta\adminOStFORMS\Regoeat to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7 Z/ 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) EL HOME ADDRESS: ZZ10Z Qoc leper-h Larl>° (nu\Jumber/street) 1 J 1rJ6 1oN 9 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: W'ry'E 614)'n"I �S&G cuoKlc (4,�N y�9 A) SouTi£.}5T Y-11r/IJ6rM (36" lu4+ `erl REPRESENTING: 9 (self/name of /'organization) \ -I- SELF l Z-D ) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: �I �'"2� AGENDA ITEM NO. 2G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) T�C5 v'� 1 :;, HOME ADDRESS: LkW2" (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: 'Sur kC. C c - (self/name of organization) Hiwp.dtaWminWT0RMSRequeel to Speak doo REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2Q ♦ f 1 1 1 Y I f f f 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 1 Ii 1 1 1 1 1 Y 1 Y 1 1 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 5 k;4 L nc L� (number/street) Hunt .9:4 9z6K7 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 4 9-53q Y REPRESENTING: (selUname of organization) H:Nxp.dta1adminSST0RMMRequeat to Speak.doo REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7 — a l — y AGENDA ITEM NO. - 21 4 8 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS (number/street) 005-z3 "M�f (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7 L� ' REPRESENTING: `kpcJ �✓^��r°� (self/name of organization) WYadmn lWp.EtaladmhM3ST0RMS\Requeet to Speak.doc r_ at 7rai/99/Spzw ( 7nld July 19, 1999 From: Arthur D. Newsbam 5321 Grandview Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92886 714-777-6089 TO: Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District SUBJECT: Item p15f on Agenda for July 21,1999 Meeting of Board of Directors. Subject: Sewer Connection Pee Waiver Request From City of Yorba Linda Homeowners Speaking on behalf of the subject City of Yorba Linda homeowners, I consider the PARR Committee's recommendation to provide the credit specified in subparagraph 6) of Agenda item 15f) to be an adequate compromise with respect to our specific request. However as a member of a broader group of homeowners within Yorba Linda and the overall area serviced by the Orange County Sanitation District I hereby express dissatisfaction with the refund schedule as presented in subparagraph 8)b) of agenda item k15f. This refund approach is based upon OCSD Ordinance No. 226 titled •AD Ordinance..................Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges" with an effective date of January 16, 1998. A careful review of paragraphs 3 and d of the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section contained in the subject PARR Committee Agenda Report indicates that in 1990 the OCSD Finance Department was aware of the over- collection of sewer fees. At the same time the OCSD Finance Department also had in their possession all data necessary to correct the error for Yorke. Linda homeowners. This is discussed in my letter dated July 12,1999 which is referenced in subparagraph 2) of this agenda item. Obviously the OCSD Finance Department'a possession of this data was not brought to the attention of the Board of Directors prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 226. Once implemented this ordinance limited to 6 years OCSD's financial liability for the over-collection of fees. Through tax year 1999-00 OCSD has erroneously over-collected approximately $460,000 or about $46,000 per year from Yorba Linda residents. Implementing Ordinance No. 226 in 199E immediately gave the OCSD a windfall equal to the fees for the first 6 years or approximately $170,000 from Yorba Linda alone. Presently this windfall increases over $47,000 for each year the refund is delayed. These amounts are undoubtedly several times higher when the entire area served by the Orange County Sanitation District is considered. Thus Ordinance No. 226 provided a significant hidden incentive for the OCSD Finance Department not to implement corrective action. It is only happening now because our waiver request exposed the problem. The District should not be rewarded and homeowners should not be penalized by the application of ordinance No. 226 to an error that the District could and should have corrected prior to implementing the ordinance. If the Board of Directors approves subparagraph B)b) as presented they are effectively rewarding the OCSD for failure to take timely corrective action and financially punishing innocent homeowners who choose not to connect to the OCSD system. In closing I respectfully request that the Board of Directors consider the following actions: 1) Remove in its entirety subparagraph 8) from Agenda item #15f and refer it back to the PARR committee. This will not delay the overall implementation because it will require considerable time to complete the effort identified in subparagraphs 5) through 7) . 2) Approve Agenda item #15f as modified. 3) Request an expedited schedule for the completion of subparagraphs 5) through 7) and an estimate when refunds could be available. Thank you Art Nawaham - 7/�/*q, - OCSD City and Agency - Collection Facilities O&Msurvey FY `9 748 Orange County Sanitation District - General Services Administration OCSD City and Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey FY `97-- 198 j N S A N 1 Tq T�o� Q � z O� �riNG� E ENv�Q, Orange County Sanitation District General Services Administration .m Orange County Sanitation District City and Member Agency Collection Facilities 1998 O&M Survey Executive Summary ., This booklet contains the results of the second year of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Collection Facilities Operations and Maintenance (O&M Survey). This survey is part of an ongoing outreach program conducted by the OCSD General Services Administration Department. As a part of this survey, we formally meet with those responsible for the daily O&M of the satellite collection systems operated by our member cities and agencies. This allows us .. to become more knowledgeable of regional assets and issues affecting owners and operators of these public facilities. This effort was conducted under the direction of Nick Arhontes, OCSD's Manager of Collection Facilities O&M. The fallowing OCSD staff members contributed to the development and implementation of this year's effort: Patrick McNelly, Sr. Management Analyst, GSA; Mike McCusker, Planner, Collection Facilities O&M, GSA; and Adriana Renescu, Senior Engineer, Technical Services Department. A standard questionnaire similar to last year's was developed for consistency and was sent to all cities and agencies. The survey was used as a guideline for discussion during follow-up meetings. This year, an electronic database was developed to track survey responses, and to provide an ongoing record of regional assets and issues. This database will continue to be updated and improved in the future as more complete information becomes available. This booklet contains a summary of the results of this year's survey. Missing or incomplete data is indicated where no response, "not available at this time" or an incomplete was given to a survey question. The data is current as of the end of Fiscal Year 1997-98 and was gathered in the failtwinter of 1998/99. As more agencies continue to gain access to e-mail, improved communications will be realized. Because of the success of this effort, it has been scheduled as an annual event. It also supports the Strategic Plan of the OCSD Collection Facilities O&M Division. A copy of this information is being sent only to OCSD Directors, and the cities and agencies that participated, with our thanks and gratitude for participating. All questions/comments/suggestions and recommendations for next year's (FY 98/99) summary and survey should be forwarded to Nick Arhontes, 714-593- 7210; e-mail (narhontes@ocsd.com), or FAX at 714-962-3071. , V r Orange County Sanitation District City and Member Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey Definitions of Fields in Questionnaire and Spreadsheet Data 1. City: Name of city or agency interviewed. In some cases, the city and the sewer agency furnishing local services were interviewed at the same time. 2. Address: The mailing address of the city/agency. 3. Agency Contact: The supervisor responsible for the maintenance of the city/agency local sewer collection system. 4. Telephone: The agency contact's telephone number. 5. E-mail: The contact's e-mail address if available. 6. FAX: Contact's FAX number. 7. Miles of Sanitary Sewer? Estimated total miles of local sanitary sewer operated in their service area. Does not include any service laterals if lateral responsibility is included. OCSD regional sewers are not included. 8. Feet of Force Main? The estimated total miles of force main operated in their service area. 9. Sewer Line Diameter: The various sizes of sewers operated by the agency. 10. Major Changes Last Year: A description of any major changes made this past year (length, size, new sewer, abandoned sewers, pump stations, etc.) 11. Maintenance Schedule: The maintenance schedule for cleaning sanitary sewer lines. 12. Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff or contractor. 13. Maintenance Equipment—Smaller than 15" The type of equipment used for cleaning small diameter sewer lines. 14. Maintenance Equipment—15" or Larger: The type of equipment used for cleaning 15-inch or larger sewer lines. Hydro or Jetter is a common term for r describing high-pressure hydroflushers. Combos are combination machines that simultaneously flush at high pressure and vacuum sewer debris for disposal. Combos are the preferred equipment for effective cleaning. Both are effective up to about 15-inch pipe sizes. 15. Unique Maintenance Procedures/Equip: A description of any unique procedures or equipment used for sewer maintenance or to improve service. 16. Number of Field Staff? How many field staff in the city/agency sanitary sewer maintenance organization. 17. Storm Drain Maintenance? Does the sanitary sewer maintenance staff maintain the storm drain system too. 18. Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? What other types of maintenance does the city/agency sanitary sewer staff perform. 19. Organizational Chart? Did the city/agency provide an organizational chart of their maintenance organization? 20. CWEA Collection Worker Certification? Does the city/agency sanitary sewer maintenance staff use the California Water Environment Association (CWEA) Collection System Maintenance certification program. 21. Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Does the city/agency use closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection of the sanitary sewer lines? 22. %, CCTV Total System? How much of the city/agency sanitary sewer system has been inspected using CCTV. 23. %, CCTV Inspected Last Year? How much of the city/agency sanitary sewer system was inspected last year using CCTV. 24. How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? Estimated number of locations where higher frequency sewer cleaning is necessary to prevent blockages and potential spills. Grease seems to be the most common problem substance. 25. Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? The number of months (cycle time) between cleaning events at the same trouble spot location. This varies by type of problem and location. 26. How Many Siphons? Common name for inverted siphons. These are "dips" between manholes that allow the sewer line to go under another private or public facility such as a storm drain, flood channel, creek, river, high-pressure natural gas line, etc. 27. Siphon Cleaning Frequency?The number of months (cycle time) between cleaning events at the same siphon location. 28. Types of Pump Stations: Pump Stations include two types as follows: a. Dry Pit: Number of pump stations where the pumps, motors, and other equipment is in a dry space for ease of maintenance. Sewage is held in a separate wetwell. b. Submersible: Number of pump stations where the pumping systems are in a common structure that also contains the sewage. Maintenance work is subject to Confined Space Entry permits and procedures. 29. Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Stations Yes or No. No means that a contractor has this responsibility. 30. Name of Contractor that Maintains your Pump Stations: The name of the contractor that maintains your pump stations if staff does not do this. 31. Pump Station Monitoring: This is a description of how the city/agency monitors their pump station operating conditions. This can include daily visits, remote telemetry, on-site telemetry, etc. 32. Pump Station Maintenance Routine: This is a description of the city/agency pump station maintenance routine, frequency, and any special maintenance procedures. 33. Pump Station Problems per Month: The approximate number of pump station problems per month. 34. Describe Your Pump Station Problems: These could include computer failures, telemetry problems, mechanical problems, etc. 35. Describe Your Force Main Problems: This could include breakage, odors, leaks, etc. 36. Describe Your Odor Problems: This is a description of the sources and locations of odor problems in the city/agency sanitary sewer system, and what methods or solutions are used to reduce or eliminate odors. 37. Odor Complaints per Month: How many odor complaints does the city/agency get each month from any source. 38. Manhole Inspections?Yes means that the city/agency or contractor does at least a visual inspection of manholes during sewer cleaning. 39. Use Manhole Inspection Forms?Yes means that the city/agency or contractor uses an inspection form designed for this purpose. ® 41). Maintain Laterals to Property Lines? Do you do any lateral maintenance to customer property lines? 41. Maintain Laterals to Home/Business? Do you do any lateral maintenance to the home or business? 42. How Many Lateral Connections? The approximate number of lateral connections the city/agency takes flow from. .d 43. Sewer Debris Disposal Program: The normal method the city/agency uses for disposing materials removed from the sanitary sewer following sewer cleaning. "Contractor" means that the firm doing the cleaning takes it somewhere. 44. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Were cities and agencies aware of the OCSD sewer debris disposal program at Plant No. 2. Extra copies of the procedure were provided during interviews. 45. Do You Use This Service?Yes means that the city/agency uses the specifically designed site at Plant No. 2. This is where OCSD deposits the debris we remove from the sewers and pump stations we clean. All debris handled at the Plant No. 2 location is disposed of in an approved manner. City/agency dumping of debris into the regional trunk system can contribute to odors and possible increased cleaning needs. 46. Do You Do Your Own Manhole Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Some cities/agencies do their own dig and replace for sewer repair when needed. Most contract this service out. Some utilize trenchless technology. Some cities replace manhole frame and cover sets, or adjust to new street surfaces with their own crews. Yes means that one or the other, or both of these maintenance activities are done in-house. No means that this is contracted out. 47. Other Responsibility for This? Who provides this service? 48. Do You Require Traffic Permits for Manhole Frame and Cover Maintenance? No means that a traffic control permit is not required when OCSD is doing manhole frame and cover repair on OCSD sewers within city/agency boundaries. Yes means that the city/agency requires OCSD to get a traffic permit before adjusting frames and covers on OCSD sewers within city/agency boundaries. 49. City Requirement for Manhole Finish For Frame and Cover Repair: This question refers to the city/agency code requirement for manhole finish and frame cover repair or the name of the city/agency contact. s a: Asphalt Cap? This is one finishing method for frame and cover adjustment or replacement. b: Concrete Finishing to Grade? Some cities are finding that plain or black pigmented concrete provides for better service Irfe than the traditional method of finishing the concrete frame "collar" 1 Yz to 2 inches low and topping with an asphalt cap to match the existing asphalt pavement. 50: Sewer Complaints per Month (approximately): The following performance categories were surveyed and include the most typical d performance indicators. a: Stoppages: Number of service interruptions and back-up of the local city/agency sewers, typically caused by grease, debris, roots or collapse. Does not include stoppages in private systems. b: Spills: Number of sewer complaints about overflows of any quantity, regardless of cause, in the city/agency sanitary sewer collection system. c: Odors: Number of complaints with responses and investigations due to odor problems from any source. d: Laterals: Number of responses made by staff or contractor to customer reported lateral-related problems of any type. Includes "false alarm" responses where the private lateral is blocked and the local sewer is flowing normally. e: Frame and Cover: Number of complaints realted to rattling, broken, vandalized or damaged covers or loose frames. f: Other: Other types of complaints not related to the above issues. 51: Describe Your Sewage Spill Response Procedures: This question refers to the city/agency sewage spill response procedures. This should be a written policy including such items as containment, control, clean-up methods and contact to regulators as required. A review of current regulations and OCSD practice was done during the interview. 52: How Many Sewage Spills Did You Have Last Year?Actual sanitary sewer overflows of any quantity in the period from July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1998. 53: Do You Have a Documented Maintenance System? Does the city/agency have a method for planning and documenting work performed on the sewer system? 54: Is it Computerized? Is the Maintenance Management System automated on some type of computerized database? 55: Have You Had Recent Problems From Commercial/industrial Customers? This would include any recent events/problems due to discharges from commercial/industrial customers such as high maintenance, sewer back-up, debris build-up, chemical problems, etc. 56: Did You Need Help From OCSD's Source Control Division Last Year? This is a Yes or No answer. 57: If Yes, Who Did You Contact and Work With? The name (if known) of the OCSD Source Control Division contact person that assisted you. d 58: Were You Satisfied With Their Help? In all cases where the OCSD Source Control was contacted, the answer was Yes. 59: Does Another Group (Besides the Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues: The name of the city/agency staff member or department responsible, such as Code Enforcement. 60: Do You Have a Grease Discharge Ordinance? Yes means that the city/agency has a local ordinance dealing with grease. 61: Do You Require Grease Traps? Does the city/agency require that grease traps or interceptors be installed at the time of new construction, service connection, or as part of the permit renewal process on targeted customers such as restaurants? Typically another city department handles this responsibility. 62: Grease Trap Inspection Program? If Yes to the previous question, does the city/agency have a regular inspection program for grease traps or interceptors? s 63: Sewer Mapping? Does the city/agency have at least a paper-based mapping system for the use of staff or contractor during sewer maintenance or for planning purposes? 64: Up to Date? Is the sewer mapping system up-to-date? 65: Is it Computerized? Is the mapping system automated now, or are there plans to automate it soon as part of a GIS program? 66: Describe Recent I& Problems: Describe any known inflow or infiltration problems where groundwater or rain-related runoff during the FY 97/98 El Niho on the city streets impacts the sewer system, including wet-weather m related spills. OCSD's Hydraulic Strategic Plan was discussed. 67: Contact for Long-Range Planning: The name of the person, department or contractor who handles long-range sanitary sewer system planning for the city/agency. 68: Comments? Any additional comments, questions or requests. 69: Miles of Each Size of Sewer You Operated in FY 1997-98? Where s available, the number of miles and diameter of each sewer line in the city/agency sanitary sewer systems. Excluded are OCSD regional sewers and private sewers in condo/business complexes, etc. m .o d Anaheim 400 E.Vermont Anaheim,CA 92806-6601 Agency Contact: Rod Hallock-Louie Vecchione Title: Sanitation Superintendent-Maint. Superintendent Telephone: 714-765-6881 E-Mail: Fax: 714-765-6842 Mlles of Sanitary Sewer? 503 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 6'to 30" Major Changes Last Year: Normal growth and capital improvements .. Maintenance Schedule: 18 months; 30,60, 90-day lists Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Vector Hydrojet than 16" ` Maintenance Equipment-15"or Vector Hydrojet Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Manhole cover removal tool Number of Field Staff? 13 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance No Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes %CCTV Total System? 50 %CCTV Inspected Lest Year? .5% m Now Many Sewer Trouble Spots? Not Totaled Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Various How Many Siphons? 80(Est.) Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 4-Private property Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains Jimni Systems(for private owners) Your Pump Stations: .d Pump Station Monitoring: N/A v Anaheim 400 E.Vermont Anaheim,CA 92805.5601 Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 s Month: _ Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: None, except 3-5 per month from storm drains Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No _+ Maint.Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? Unknown Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Grease is broken up in jetting and flows downline. Small amounts of grit and shale are drained and hauled with street sweepings. Large amounts are hauled to OCSD. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes s, Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Contact Dave Nelson (714) 765-5916 ` Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 0 Spills: 1 Odors: 0 Laterals: 35 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Written policy Response Procedures: d Anaheim 400 E.Vermont Anaheim, CA 92805-6601 How Many Sewage Spills Did 3 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No m Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No ,m From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the Code Enforcement-John Poole (714) 765-5190 Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No w Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I &i Problems: 40 manholes in Anaheim Hills were hydro plugged and sealed with Aquapoxy. m, Contact for Long-Range Planning? Ralph Harp, P,W. Engineer(714)765-5176 Comments? Interested in CMMS .m �^ Miles of Each Size of Beware you Operated in FY 1997198? Diametem Miles: m a Brea 545 N. Berry Brea,CA 92821-3107 Agency Contact: Jerry Mesa Title: Supervisor Telephone: 714-990-7697 E-Mail: jerrym@ci.brea.ca.us Fax: 714-671-1493 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 76.5 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 6", 8", V'. 15" Major Changes Last Year: Old private wastewater disposal site steel pipe of8ine Maintenance Schedule: Yearly; Monthly trouble spots Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor-Empire Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydrojet by contractor than 15" Maintenance Equipment-16" or Hydrojet Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? None Number of Field Staff? 1 `m Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Oversee Contractor Responsibilities? e Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes % CCTV Total System? 100 % CCTV Inspected Last Year? 100 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 100 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 2 " Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 1- Brianvood: six hom Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes `y Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Local light only Brea 545 N.Berry Brea, CA 92821-3107 Pump Station Maintenance Cleaning/Deodorizer Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A -' Problems: Describe Your Force Main Debris in mains;cleaned by contractor 'm Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Odor caused by debris;we clean by jetting and than deodorize Odor Complaints per Month: 2 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to HomelBusiness? No How Many Lateral Connections? 10,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Contractor does cleaning Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 2 Spills: 1 Odors: 2 Laterals: 3 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Contain spill; call contractor, report. Response Procedures: .„ Brea 545 N. Berry Brea, CA 92821-3107 How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No From Commercialfindustrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? e Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the No Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No m Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Minor infiltration; inflow at two manholes at Imperial and Berry. Contact for Long-Range Planning? John Hogan, Engineering Department Comments? Installing a cleaning system for street sweepers; GIS-Kellen Haluza (714)990-7657;wants info on CWFA certification and trenchless methods. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? ,® Diameters 8 Mlles: Diameters 10 Miles: Diameters 15 Miles: ® Diameters 6 Miles: Buena Park 8701 Page St.-P.O. Box 5009 Buena Park, CA 90622-5009 m Agency Contact: Frank M. Heldman Title: Water/Sewer Superintendent Telephone: 714-562-3705 E-Mail: scondev@buenapark.com Fax: 714-562-369 d Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 250 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 6"to 21" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Between 3 to 4 years because we clean and TV both Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydrojetting than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or Hydrojetting Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Hydrojetting with rotating nozzle or rotating chain cutter Number of Field Staff? 3 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? TV sewer mains, laterals, emergency repairs, manhole frame and nslb cover repair, clean siphon hot spots, vapor root contracts, sewer lining Organizational Chart? (;oer}tracts, sewer manhole contracts CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes •CCTV Total System? 100 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 25 ^� How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 12 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 12 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 3-Private Does Staff Maintain Your Pump N/A Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: N/A a, Buena Park 8701 Page St.-P.O. Box 6009 Buena Park,CA 90622-5009 Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Odor problems caused by sewer backups. Unplug lines and wash down debris into manholes. Other odor problems are from OCSD manholes. _ Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to HomelBusiness? No How Many Lateral Connections? 18,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: The city has a dump site equipped with separation tanks to separate solid debris from liquid. The liquid waste is then returned to the sewer - - system via separation tanks. m Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Sam ice? No ® Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Coordinated through John Hogan, Engineering. (714) 990-7657 1L Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: <2 Spills: 0 Odors: <1 Laterals: <1 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: <3 Describe Your Sewago Spill Isolate the spill, vacuum sewer spill and unplug the main. Notify Response Procedures: appropriate agencies if required, e.g., in excess of 1,000 gallons. Buena Park 8701 Page St. -P.O. Box 5009 Buena Park, CA 90622-5009 How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes ,e Maintenance System? Is It Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems No m From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the No Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I &I Problems: None Contact for Long-Range Planning? Frank Heldman-Water/Sewer Superintendent Comments? Grease issues; long-term insituform user, interested in rehab demos, staff training, piggy-back on POs. Software for CMMS and CCTV a Mlles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 19971987 Diameters 6" Miles: 60 Diameters 8" Miles: 180 Diameters 10 Miles: 4 Diameters 12 Miles: 2 Diameters 15 Miles: 2 Diameters 21 Miles: 2 ,�. Costa Mesa Sanitary District P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 .y Agency Contact: Rob Hamers Title: Manager/District Engineer Telephone: 949-631-1731 E-Mail: I.d.thompson@worldnet.att.net ® Fax: 949-548-6516 d Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 325 Feet of Force Main? 24,813 Sewer Line Diameter 8"to 30"Gravity;4"to 18"Force Main Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Yearly plus trouble spot list d, Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff - Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Two combo bucks-Vactors than 16" d Maintenance Equipment-15"or Flushing with 8"sand nozzle Larger Unique Maint Procedums/Equip? Hydrogen peroxide to control odor; Plug Away, grease cutting head, roolcutter Number of Field Staff? 5 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance NIA Responsibilities? m Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No e Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes %CCTV Total System? 95 CCTV Inspected Last Year? 1 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 30 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Weekly How Many Siphons? 10 'a Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Weekly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 1 Submersible: 19 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes a' Stations? ._ Name of Contractor that Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: 24-hr a day telemetry plus a daily visual check of each station. Costa Mesa Sanitary District P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Pump Station Maintenance Visual upon arrival—Recommended maintenance schedule-Pump Routine: Hours recorded—Daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly-Panel box inspected; other maintenance items are scheduled at regular intervals. Pump Station Problems per 2 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Air pressure regulator switches Problems: Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Odors at a few pump stations; neutralize with hydrogen peroxide; summertime, maybe two per week. Odor Complaints per Month: Eight per month in the summer Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 25,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Keep flushing down line; sometimes landfill; will start using OCSD program soon. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Contractor Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? m Stoppages: 1 Spills: <1 Odom: Two per week- Laterals: 4 'a Frame and Cover: ummer only Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Contain, call, control, cleanup Response Procedures: Cypress 5275 Orange Ave. Cypress, CA 90630-2957 Agency Contact: Kamran Dadbeh-Bob Campbe Title: Associate Engineer/Street Maint. Supervisor Telephone: 714-229-6756 d E-Mail: Kdadbeh@ci.cypress.ca.us Fax: 714-229-0154 d Mlles of Sanitary Sewer? 87 Feet of Force Main? 2,000 Sewer Line Diameter 8", 10", 12", 15" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Every two years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff(was contractor- Walker) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Jetter truck and vacuum trailer .< than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or NIA Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? CCTV inspection(co-own CCTV equipment with City of Seal Beach); testing ENZ nozzles. Number of Field Staff? 2 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Mies? ance Responsibilities? Storm drain maintenance/street sweeping m Organizational Chart? N/A CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No d Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes _ %CCTV Total System? 0 %CCTV Inspected Last Year? None How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 34 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 11 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 2 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Inspect the control panel and keep a daily log of the pump's elapsed time meters. G Cypress 5275 Orange Ave. Cypress,CA 90630-2957 Pump Station Maintenance We check the station every day and have electronic devices to tell Routine: when service is needed. We lubricate compressors monthly and inspect check-valves monthly. Pump Station Problems per 0 Q Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: We check and clean manholes and lines, and seal lids. Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? N/A Sewer Debris Disposal Program: We would like to use OCSD facility. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes - Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? G Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole 49 Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes ® Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? �.. Stoppages: 1 Spills: 1 Odors: 1 Laterals: 1 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Go out and block off storm drains and unplug line, and pump sewage Response Procedures: back into manhole and then disinfect area: follow up with report. Cypress 5275 Orange Ave. Cypress, CA 90630-2957 How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes ,e Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems Staff(was contractor- Walker) From Commercial/industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's Yes Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and Unknown Work With? a, Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group (Besides the City Code Enforcement division Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? " Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: None noticed, but known perched water zones Contact for Long-Range Planning? Karmen Dadpeh-(714)229-6756 Comments? Need OCSD assistance with trouble spots at Moody and Lincoln, and Cerritos and Florence;wants information on educational and training classes. Miles of Each Sae of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 8 Miles: 78.8 Diameters 10 Miles: 4.61 Diameters 12 Miles: 1.96 Diameters 15 Miles: 1.59 ±± Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92708-4736 r_ Agency Contact: James Sharp/Pat Danahy Title: Asst. Superintendent/Crew Leader Telephone: 714-593-4493 y E-Mail: Fax: 714-965-3252 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 130 Feet of Force Main? 100 Sewer Line Diameter 8. 10", 12", 15', 18", 21", 24" Major Changes Last Year: Added approximately (1)one mile of 8-inch VCP Maintenance Schedule: 18 months Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck v than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or Combo Truck Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Tree Removal Program: Selected trees that are major causes of root problems in sewers are removed and replaced with trees with fewer noninvasive roots. Four standard trees are used per written policy. Number of Field Staff? 3 r Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Asphalt maintenance/concrete/sign maintenance Responsibilities? r_ Organizational Chan.? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Cenif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes %CCTV Total System? 33 •CCTV Inspected Last Year? 10 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 27 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly .. How Many Siphons? 9 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 2 Submersible: 0 r Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? _ Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: r' Pump Station Monitoring: SCADA;daily preventive maintenance ,y Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92708-4736 r Agency Contact: James Sharp/Pat Danahy Title: Asst Supenntendent/Crew Leader Telephone: 714-593-4493 E-Mail: Fax: 714-965-3252 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 130 Feet of Force Main? 100 Sewer Line Diameter 8", 10", 12", 15", 18",21",24" Major Changes Last Year: Added approximately(1)one mile of 8-inch VCP Maintenance Schedule: 18 months Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment- 15" or Combo Truck - Larger Unique Maint ProcedureslEquip? Tree Removal Program: Selected trees that are major causes of root problems in sewers are removed and replaced with trees with fewer noninvasive roots. Four standard trees are used per written policy. Number of Field Staff? 3 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? Asphalt maintenance/concrete/sign maintenance Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Cenif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? 33 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 10 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 27 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 9 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 2 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes d Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: ® Pump Station Monitoring: SCADA; daily preventive maintenance ti Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92706-4736 Pump Station Maintenance Daily visual inspection;weeldy maintenance Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station One last year due to a power failure Problems: - Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Manholes adjacent to OCSD; odor controlled using plugs d Odor Complaints per Month: 2 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No ,y Maint. Laterals to HomelBusiness? No How Many Lateral Connections? 16,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Use OCSD Plant No. 2 disposal site Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes ,e Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for No -- Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Notify City Engineer/Inspector Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 0 Spills: 0 Odors: 2 Laterals: 0 'y Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Contain, vacuum, sanitize, report(as appropriate) Response Procedures: Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 927084736 How Many Sewage Spills Did 0 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No From Commercialllndustrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No w Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who DM You Contact and N/A Work With? ,m Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the Fountain Valley Fire Department Haz Mat Team Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle m Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? ® Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No U Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Plugged manhole covers to prevent inflow; no problems ,e Contact for Long-Range Planning? Jeff Sinn -(714) 5934441 Comments? Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997/98? m Diameters 8 Miles: 100 Diameters 10 Miles: 10 Diameters 12 Miles: 7 m Diameters 15 Miles: 5 Diameters 18 Miles: 3 G Diameters 21 Miles: 3 Diameters 24 Miles: 2 Fullerton 303 W. Commonwealth Fullerton, CA 92832-1710 Agency Contact: Don Boyles-Dan Dim Title: Maintenance Supervisor/Crew Leader Telephone: 714-738-6308 E-Mall: DanD@ci.Fullerton.ca.us Fax: 714-738-3100 e Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 360 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 4"to 33" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Every 5 years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Malntenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or Staff/Contractor as needed Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? None Number of Field Staff? 3 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Street maintenance; storm drains <1% of the time Responsibilities? ti Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes % CCTV Total System? 10 % CCTV Inspected Last Year? >1% How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 55 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 10 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump N/A c Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: N/A ti y Fullerton 303 W.Commonwealth Fullerton, CA 92832-1710 Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Minor, also algae in flood control channels: Richman and Malvern; Orangethorpe and Highland Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maim. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 26.000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: OCSD-Plant No.2 c' Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes w Do You do Your Own Manhole N/A - Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? �v Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Contact Dave Langstaff(714)738-6858 in Traffic Engineering or Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Fullerton P.D. Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? m Stoppages: 4 Spills: 3 Odors: 0 Laterals: 11 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill No Response Response Procedures: ,y Fullerton 303 W.Commonwealth Fullerton, CA 92832.1710 ® How Many Sewage Spills Did 36 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes a, Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems ,r From Commercialllndustrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No r Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? w Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Sesides the NIA Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? N/A Computerized? No Describe Recent I&I Problems: None a Contact for Long-Range Planning? Ron Wallin-Engineer-738-8853 Comments? Two-year testing using"First and Last' roach control;grease problems at Summit House restaurant and at Harbor and Orangethorpe; approximately 50%of problems are due to roots,40%grease, 10% other. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1887188? Diameters Miles: m re Garden Grove 13902 Newhope St Garden Grove, CA 92843-3717 a Agency Contact: Boyd Conkle Title: Utilities Superintendent Telephone: 714-7415395 E-Mail: debrad@ch.ci.garden-grove.ca.us Fax: 714£38-9906 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 400 Feet of Force Main? 8,700 Sewer Line Diameter 6", 8", 10", 12", 18", 24" Major Changes Last Year: Only minor changes this year Maintenance Schedule: Being developed Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Vector truck,jetter, and guides than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or N/A Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Degreaser, 350 roots, tackle mats, plug-away, and super IO Number of Field Staff? 4 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Lift station maintenance and public relations Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? N/A • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 3 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 65 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 150 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 2 Submersible: 2 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains Staff has contractor help Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Electrical maintenance, visual inspection, and observation while pumps are operating. Garden Grove 13902 Newhope St Garden Grove, CA 92843-3717 Pump Station Maintenance Yearly electrical maintenance; yearly control maintenance; monthly Routine: generator set maintenance;twice weekly site visits. Pump Station Problems per 1-2 G Month: Describe Your Pump Station Monthly control problems; mechanical problems twice a year. Problems: Describe Your Force Main Techlte pipe failures Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Chronic odor problems around a lift station. G Odor Complaints per Month: One per month; no specific procedure identified at this time. Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? Some Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? Some How Many Lateral Connections? 34.000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: OCSD program U Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes - Do You Use This Service? Yes Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractor Do You Require Tragic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Contact Engineer(Jim Smith) Finish Fmme and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes a, Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 2 Spills: 3 Odom: 2 Laterals: 2 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill We use the three C's Response Procedures: u ve Garden Grove 13902 Newhope St Garden Grove, CA 92843-3717 How Many Sewage Spills Did 13 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Informal Log s, Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No G From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No d Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A _ Does Another Group (Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? No Up to date? No Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Wet weather caused ground settling, which caused a techite sewer force main to break. ,.. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Jim Smith-City Engineer Comments? Do you have a model grease ordinance? Can we gel a copy of your cleaning specifications? We'd like to know your procedures for m cleaning large sewer mains. Need information about education and training programs. Would like to go on dd"long with OCSD cleaning crews. Miles of Each Sae of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters Not known at this point;will be Miles: determined by Master Plan. +i c, Huntington Beach 17371 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647-6202 ee Agency Contact: Jerry Dilks Title: Crew Leader Telephone: 714-375-5054 E-Mail: " Fax: 714-375-5099 4 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 676.6 Feet of Force Main? 34.320 ,a Sewer Line Diameter 8", 10", 12", 15", 27" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller 2 Jetters, 1 Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or Jetters Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? 4" storm drain nozzles, 6"siphon nozzles, Calcium cutter, Diamond-tip �i lateral cutter Number of Field Staff? 13 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Minor rehabs Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes - CWEA Collection Worker Certif7 Yes d Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes •CCTV Total System? 21 •CCTV Inspected Last Year? 30 ^' How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 130 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Bimonthly/Semi-Annually How Many Siphons? 27 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly/Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 26 Submersible: 2 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes 'F Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Telemetered H w Huntington Beach 17371 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647-6202 Pump Station Maintenance Daily Routine: Pump Station Problems per 3 = Month: Describe Your Pump Station Computer Failures, Check-valve problems (cleaning), Power outages Problems: v, Describe Your Force Main Breakage, age Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Stormwater, pump stations, seal maintenance, masking agent used Odor Complaints per Month: 10 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Fortes? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 44,100 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Take to OCSD- Plant No 2 "^ Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes ,4 Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: .5 Spills: 5 Odors: 1 Laterals: 10 Frame and Cover: 2 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Call outs from police department. Response time is about 15 to 20 Response Procedures: minutes Huntington Beach 17371 Gothard Street Huntington Beach,CA 92647-6202 How Many Sewage Spills Did 5 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes ,., Maintenance System? Is It Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems Some at Heil and Algonquin streets due to offshore oil production From Commercial/Industrial platform Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who DM You Contact and NIA Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?NIA Does Another Group(Besides the NIA Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle .. Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? 14 Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes,on new facilities Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I&I Problems: Flooded streets; Many old broken pipes; High surf; Flooded storm drains; Rain Contact for Long-Range Planning? Bob Eichblaft-Engineering Comments? Working with OCSD Air Quality group on some storm drain problems near Plant No. 2. Also, continue intermittent odor problems from d+ naturally occurring marsh gasses near Plant No. 2. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 8 Miles: 514 Diameters 10 Miles: 22 Diameters 12 Miles: 17 .. Diameters 15 Miles: 15 Diameters 27 . Miles: 0.5 r p� Irvine Ranch Water District 3512 Michelson Dr. Irvine,CA 92612-1757 r Agency Contact: A.T. Kilani Title: Collection System Manager Telephone: 949-453-5749 E-Mail: .. Fax: 949-476-2854 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 525 Feet of Force Main? 38,000 Sewer Line Diameter 6"to 61" Major Changes Last Year: Built two new dry-pit pump stations. CIP of one sewer lift station. Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Two combos and two hydro trucks than 16" Maintenance Equipment-15"or N/A Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? We inspect areas of our agency's existing lines and keep records to keep track of conditions, repairs needed, and root and water infiltration to prevent any spills or serious problems from happening. H Number of Field Staff? 7 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? Maintain pump stations and repair service lines. m Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Cer if? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes %CCTV Total System? 25 %CCTV Inspected Last Year? 25 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 26 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Now Many Siphons? 13 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 9 Submersible: 2 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractor that Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: .. Pump Station Monitoring: SCADA: Manual inspections and record keeping 1O Irvine Ranch Water District 3512 Michelson Dr. Irvine, CA 92612-1757 Pump Station Maintenance Check on pumping efficiency; check on generator status and Routine: operations(once a month test); test bubbler system and high-level float alarm; test switches and controls; drain compressor Pump Station Problems per 1 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Usually from intrusion Problems: Describe Your Force Main We have had one force main break in the past six months;this was Problems: the first problem we have had with force mains due to footing from Describe Your Odor Problems: Bdokboth trunklines-we seal lids with silicone; Odor from our pump stations-we treat with bioxide to eliminate the problem. Odor Complaints per Month: 2 Manhole Inspections ? Yes a Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? Yes Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 150,000 m Sewer Debris Disposal Program: We dump debris and it is separated at the headworks. After dumping and separation,we dispose of grit into a special dumpster for disposal. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractors Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 1 Spills: 0 Odors: 3 Laterals: 3 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Contain flow from source using vector or sandbags. We then clear the Response Procedures: stoppage and clean the area. Then we report the spill to the proper agencies in accordance with our spill response form. Irvine Ranch Water District 3512 Michelson Dr. Irvine,CA 92612-1757 How Many Sewage Spills Did 1 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes d Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems Grease ,e From Commercialllndustrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? s, Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the No Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle ,a Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I&I Problems: Inflow problem at University lift station Contact for Long-Range Planning? Mike Hoolihan(949)453-5533(For GIS also) Comments? Debris problems with new alleged self-cleaning wet-well at University pump station; Interested in using OCSD for root foaming. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997/98? Diameters 6"to 12" Miles: 460 Diameters 16'to61" Miles: 65 La Habra 621 W. Lambert Rd. La Habra, CA 90631-6755 Agency Contact: Rich Moody Title: Water Maintenance Supervisor Telephone: 562-905-9792 E-Mail: Fax: 562-691-1626 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 127 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 4"to 30" Major Changes Last Year: None m Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Walker) Malntenace Equipment-Smaller Jetting than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or N/A Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? None Number of Field Staff? 0.5 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Water Maintenance Responelbilitles? m Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No O° Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes CCTV Total System? 0 CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 71 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 0 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: N/A c La Habra 621 W. Lambert Rd. La Habra, CA 90631-6755 Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A 6' Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: N/A Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections ? No . Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Mainz. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 12,667 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Wash it down with the Flow Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No e, Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole ' Finish Frame and Cover Repair: ° Asphalt Cap? Yes ,d Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 6 Spills: 1 Odors: 3 Laterals: 3 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 1 -Roaches Describe Your Sewage Spill 1. Receive complaint. 2, Water Maintenance Division responds. 3. Response Procedures: Emergency call to our sewer contractor if problem with city's main line. �` 4. Contain spill and report to appropriate agencies. o La Habra 621 W. Lambert Rd. La Habra, CA 90631-6755 How Many Sewage Spills Did 10 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems Contractor(Walker) ® From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No _ Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the NIA Sower Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No d Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I& I Problems: Bedford/Superior-Near Harbor Contact for Long-Range Planning? Majdi Ataya-City Engineer Comments? TV area near Imperial/Euclid for offset Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 4" Miles: .02 Diameters 6" Miles: 4.1 Diameters 8" Miles: 105 Diameters 10" Miles: 8 Diameters 12" Miles: 5.4 �+ Diameters 14" Miles: .04 Diameters 15" Miles: 1.09 Diameters 18" Miles: .57 G Diameters 24" Miles: 7.8 Diameters 27"-30" Miles: .14 m La Palma 7622 Walker St. La Palma,CA 90623-1721 m m Agency Contact: [smile Noorbaksh Title: Director of Public Works Telephone: 714-523-1140 E-Mall: Fax: 714-523-2141 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 33 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 4"to 24" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Every two years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? N/A Maintenace Equipment-Smaller N/A m than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or N/A Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? N/A Number of Field Staff? 0 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? se Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Cerdf? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? No %CCTV Total System? 0 %CCTV Inspected Last Year? N/A How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 0 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? N/A How Many Siphons? N/A Siphon Cleaning Frequency? N/A Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 .� Does Staff Maintain Your Pump N/A Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains NIA Your Pump Stations: m Pump Station Monitoring: N/A m La Palma 7822 Walker St. La Palma,CA 90623-1721 Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 d Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: N/A Odor Complaints per Month: NIA Manhole Inspections ? NIA Use Manhole Inspection Forms? N/A Maint Laterals to Property Lines? N/A d Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? NIA How Many Lateral Connections? N/A d Sewer Debris Disposal Program: N/A Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Concrete Finishing to Grade? Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: Spills: Odors: Laterals: Frame and Cover: Other: Describe Your Sewage Spill Response Procedures: d La Palma 7822 Walker St. La Palma, CA 90623-1721 How Many Sewage Spills Did N/A You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented N/A Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? N/A Have You Had Recent Problems From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's N/A Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge N/A Ordinance? ® Do You Require Grease Traps? N/A Grease Trap Inspection Program? N/A Sewer Mapping? N/A Up to date? N/A Computerized? N/A Describe Recent I & I Problems: N/A ® Contact for Long-Range Planning? Comments? -- Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? Diameters Not Available Miles: Midway City Sanitary District 14451 Cedarwood Ave. Westminster, CA 92683-5318 Agency Contact: Del Boyer Title: General Manager Telephone: 714-893-3553 E-Mall: Fax: 714-891-8624 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 168 Feet of Force Main? 3610 s, Sewer Line Diameter 8", 10", 12", 15', 18" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combos than 15" Maintenance Equipment- 15"or Combos Larger Unique Maint ProcedureslEquip? N/A Number of Field Staff? 5 ® Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Building and yard maintenance Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes CCTV Total System? 15 CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 20 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 16 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 3 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Telephone warning system and scheduled visits. Midway City Sanitary District 14451 Cedarwood Ave. Westminster, CA 926835318 m Pump Station Maintenance Visit pump stations Monday and Friday; routine maintenance is Routine: included in visits. Pump Station Problems per .5 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Packing, degreasing wet well,electrical and pumps Problems: Describe Your Force Main None in the past five years ® Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Most odor problems occur at connections to OCSD trunks. We seal our manholes and use liquid deodorizer a Odor Complaints per Month: One Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint.Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 27.000 .m Sewer Debris Disposal Program: We have a yard sump in our maintenance yard. ^' Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No ® Do You do Your Own Manhole Some Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractor Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 5 Spills: 2 Odors: 1 Laterals: 0 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill After hours, we are notified by cellular phone. Staff is on call. One Response Procedures: staff member goes to the site and calls additional staff with equipment as necessary. The blockage is removed, spill kept out of storm drains, appropriate agency notified. Midway City Sanitary District 14451 Cedarwood Ave. Westminster,CA 92683-5318 How Many Sewage Spills Did 15, You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No Maintenance System? Is It Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No s, From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? s, Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the NIA Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle d Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No " Sewer Mapping? No Up to date? No Computerized? No Describe Recent I&I Problems: We experienced 13 El Nino, ground water infiltration related sewer failures between March 4, 1998 and July 1, 1998. These sewer failures were accompanied by sinkholes in streets. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Del Boyer Comments? Residential grease blockage problems. Undersized Flood control channel at Cedarwood near District headquarters. High water table in .d the Northwest area of the city. e Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997/987 ,r Diameters 8 Miles: 164 Diameters 10"to 18" Miles: 4 sv Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Agency Contact: Ed Burt Title: Utilities Supervisor Telephone: 949644-3011 E-Mail: eburt@city-newport-beach.ca.us Fax: 949646-5204 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 200 Feet of Force Main? 105,600 Sewer Line Diameter 4", 6 ,8", 10", 12-, 14", 1 V' Major Changes Last Year: 11,262 R of 8-inch sewer pipe; 1,940 it of 6-inch HDPE(Force Main replacement);abandonment of 47th Street pump station Maintenance Schedule: Every two years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Malntenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or Hydrooleaning and root cutter Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Two combo trucks; one hydro flusher, one small rodder for laterals Number of Field Staff? 9 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Training; distribution problem; and oil, gas, street light and storm drain Responsibilities? G emergency situations Organizational Chart? Yes CWE4 Collection Worker Certif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes CCTV Total System? 20 CCTV Inspected Last Year? 5 m' How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 100 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly and quarterly How Many Siphons? 3 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pk: 20 Submersible: 3 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes ® Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains NIA Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: SCADA; FSK(Frequency Shift Key); RTC; Pulse Duration- P/D Newport Beach P.O. Box 1763 Newport Beach,CA 92658-8915 Pump Station Maintenance Weekly inspections; pump teardown every two years. Routine: Pump Station Problems per 1 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Power failures at substationslsubfeeders Problems: Describe Your Force Main Odor problems Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Submersible pump station-enzymes and chemical used to reduce odors. Odor Complaints per Month: 5 Manhole Inspections ? Yes 6' Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? Yes Maint.Laterals to Home/Business? Yes How Many Lateral Connections? 23,262 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Disposal station/general services ._. Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? No Do You Use This Service? No m, Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? No ,G Concrete Finishing to Grade? Yes Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 2 Spills: <1 Odors: 1 Laterals: 5 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Contain,vacuum,clear blockage;written policy, contact, report Response Procedures: Orange 637 W.Struck Ave. Orange,CA 92867-6444 ® Agency Contact: Phil Pierce Title: Street Maintenance Division Manager Telephone: 714-532-6487 E-Mail: G Fax: 714-532-6444 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 305 Feet of Force Main? 0 „ Sewer Line Diameter 6 , 8", 10", 12",16% 18",21",24" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually .�, Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Walker) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller HydroJetter than 15" .z Maintenance Equipment-15"or Hydro-Jetter Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? NIA Number of Field Staff? 2 a' Stom Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes CW FA Collection Worker Cer0f? No e Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes •CCTV Total System? 40 •CCTV Inspected Last Year? 30 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 50 -- Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 1 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Monthly inspections and service by contractor d Orange 637 W.Struck Ave. Orange, CA 92867-6444 a Pump Station Maintenance Monthly inspections and service by contractor Routine: Pump Station Problems per .5 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Two to three per year- pump failure (pumps were replaced) -- Problems: m Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Have not had any major odor problems. When they occur, the system area is flushed. Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections ? Yes m Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 35,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Contractor responsibility Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes -- Do You Use This Service? No m. Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole c' Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Concrete Finishing to Grade? Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 7 Spills: .5 Odors: .5 Laterals: 10 Frame and Cover: .5 Other: 0 - Describe Your Sewage Spill Person on call responds and provides diking if necessary. Calls Response Procedures: contractor to relieve stoppage. Notifies appropriate agencies. ® Contractor provides clean-up. Orange 637 W.Struck Ave. Orange,CA 92867-6444 How Many Sewage Spills Did 6-10 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems Yes From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's Yes Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and Unknown Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group (Besides the Code Enforcement Staff- Frank Harlan Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No w Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I& I Problems: Two to three locations in the city were infiltrated: City Yard area; Tustin and Walnut-replaced manhole cover. All problems were caused by storm water inflow. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Roger Hohnbaum-Asst. City Engineer-744-5544 Comments? GIS contact-George Lang r+ Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 6 Miles: 34.406 Diameters 8 Miles: 219.541 Diameters 10 Miles: 9.751 Diameters 12 Miles: 21.825 Diameters 15 Miles: 9.908 Diameters 18 Miles: 4.521 Diameters 21 Miles: 1.756 Diameters 24 Miles: 2.041 Diameters 15 PVC Miles: .324 Diameters 18 PVC Miles: .483 ,a Placentia 401 E. Chapman Ave Placentia, CA 92870-6101 Agency Contact: Chris Becker Title: Director of Public Works Telephone: 714-993-8245 E-Mail: cbecker@plamntia.org Fax: 714-961-0283 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 22 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameters: 8", 10", 12;', 15", 18",21" Major Changes Last Year: Some new housing tracts;almost built out. Maintenance Schedule: Every three years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Walker) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydmjet Truck than 16" Maintenance Equipment- 15" or Hydmjet Truck Larger Unique Maint ProcedureslEquip? Weekly use of liquid bacterialenzyme in eight trouble spots Number of Field Staff? 0 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? ® Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif9 No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? No • CCTV Total System? 0 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 G How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 10 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 6 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump N/A Stations? - Name of Contractorthal Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: N/A Placentia 401 E.Chapman Ave Placentia, CA 92870-6101 .. Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 e Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: One or two per year due to stoppages; cleaned by hydrojeding Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections? No '® Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Malnt Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? No Data Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Done by contractor w Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes - Do You Use This Service? No ,y Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? d Other Responsibility for This? Contractor(Gentry)Co. -L.A. County Area Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Malnt? City Requirement for Manhole Call Tom Risher(714)993-8131 for more information Finish Frame and Cover Repair. Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? w Stoppages: 12 Spills: .5 Odors: 0 Laterals: 0 `tl Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 -- Describe Your Sewage Spill City has a sewage spill response contingency plan that outlines the Response Procedures: first responder duties and the duties of supervisory personnel. Placentia 401 E. Chapman Ave Placentia,CA 92870-6101 ® Now Many Sewage Spills Did 6-10 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes ,e Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No w From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? ,a Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group(Besides the Planning Department-Code Enforcement Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle m Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sower Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: No major problems G Contact for Long-Range Planning? Art Burgner-Engineering Services Manager Comments? Interested in CWEA certification program and OCSD cleaning specifications and manhole inspection forms. w Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? G Diameters 10 Miles: 4.56 Diameters 12 Miles: 3.36 Diameters 15 Miles: 0.61 Diameters 18 Miles: 0.38 Diameters 21 Miles: 0.065 Diameters 08 Miles: 13.03 Rossmoorl Los Alamitos Area Sewer District 3243 Katella Ave. P.O.Box 542 Los Alamitos, CA 90720-2336 Agency Contact: Sandra Montez Title: General Manager Telephone: 562-431-2223 E-Mall: SLMontez@aol.com Fax: 562-430-3691 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 54 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 8", 10", 12", 15, 18 Major Changes Last Year: Orangewood Project-a construction project to build approximately 2,500 feet of 18"sewer connection the Los Alamitos Armed forces Reserve Base with a main trunk sewer line in Los Alamitos Boulevard by OCSD. Maintenance Schedule: Annually e Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Empire) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydrojet than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or Hydrojet Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? N/A Number of Field Staff? 0 c' Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? 0 Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No e" Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? 60 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 7 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 6 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Semi-Annually How Many Slptwns? 1 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Yearly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump N/A d Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: N/A s, Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer District 3243 Katella Ave. P.O. Box 542 Los Alamitos, CA 90720-2336 m Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 p Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: N/A d Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint.Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 7,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Done by contractor Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No _ Other? Sower Complaints per Month? m Stoppages: 0 Spills: 0 Odors: 0 Laterals: 0 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill On 24-hour call-usually notified by the police department. Contact Response Procedures: Empire Pipe Cleaning-they respond within 1/2 hour. Rossmoorl Los Alamitos Area Sewer District 3243 Katella Ave. P.O. Box 542 Los Alamitos, CA 90720-2336 How Many Sewage Spills Did 0 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No m From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? ,�. Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle d, Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? G Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I& I Problems: None h� Contact for Long-Range Planning? Boyle Engineering Comments? Recently conducted a survey of all restaurants, seeking information on grease interceptor installations. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? w Diameters 10 Miles: 1.8 _ Diameters 12 Miles: 2.5 Diameters 15 Miles: 0.3 e Diameters 18 Miles: 0.9 Diameters 8 Miles: 48.8 w Santa Ana 220 S. Daisy Ave, M-85 Santa Ana, CA 927034334 Agency Contact: Ray Burk Title: Senior Civil Engineer Telephone: 714-647-3317 E-Mail: m Fax: 714-647-3345 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 450 Feet of Force Main? 100 Sewer Line Diameter 8"to 24" Major Changes Last Year: Minimal projects last year Maintenance Schedule: Annually .� Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydrojet than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or Hydrojet -- Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Used a chain head to remove hard calcium deposits in approximately c' 2,500 linear feet of sewer Number of Field Staff? 4 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? o Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No m Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? 2 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 1 c' How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 38 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 20 `9 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit; 2 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: SCADA system Santa Ana 220 S. Daisy Ave,M-85 Santa Ana,CA 92703.4334 Pump Station Maintenance Maintained routinely by water systems operators; they inspect stations Routine: at least weekly and perform routine scheduled maintenance on all equipment. Pump Station Problems per G Month: Describe Your Pump Station Less than 1 or 2 a year. Mainly due to equipment malfunctions, pump Problems: and motor wear and tear related. Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Odor problems are mostly realted to storm drains. Debris is removed from catch basins and channels are cleaned. Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections ? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maim.Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 45.000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Grease and debris are broken up and flushed to larger OCSD trunk sewers. Larger obstructions, like wood and bricks are removed. m° Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A P Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole N/A Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? No Concrete Finishing to Grade? Yes Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? m Stoppages: 5 Spills: 1 Odors: 5 Laterals: 3 ® Frame and Cover: 4 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill We respond Immediately with cleaning crew and other forces to berm Response Procedures: and contain spill. After clog is removed, any spilled sewage is disposed of. If spill Is large,we call for vacuum truck for disposal. We then notify authorities. Santa Ana 220 S. Daisy Ave, M-85 Santa Ana, CA 92703-4334 How Many Sewage Spills Did 3 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is It Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems o From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's Yes Source Control Division Last Year? m If Yes,Who Did You Contact and Mike Zedek Work With? e Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group(Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle ,o Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to dater Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: No spills, but sewage lift station at Bristol and Seagerstrom was e, pushed to the limit of its capacity due to high inflow. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Ray Burk-714-647-3317 Comments? No sewer maintenance fee as yet Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? e, Diameters Miles: 0 ,a Seal Beach 211 8th St- Seal Beach, CA 90740-6305 Agency Contact: Steve Stockett Title: Public Works Supervisor Telephone: 562-431-2527 E-Mall: Fax: 562431-4067 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 45 Feet of Force Main? 20,724 Sewer Line Diameter 4 ,8",8", 10", 12", 15", 16", 24" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually .� Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Walker) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydrocleaning 4 than 15" Maintenance Equipment- 15"or Contracted out If needed Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? Share CCTV equipment with the City of Cypress w Number of Field Staff? 3 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? Pump Station, Building Maintenance, and Signal Maintenance Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No a Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes •CCTV Total System? i •CCTV Inspected Last Year? 1 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 17 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 1 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Yearly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 3 Submersible: 6 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractor that Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Daily inspections and monitoring, take readings w �• Seal Beach 211 eth St. Seal Beach, CA 90740-6306 r. Pump Station Maintenance Low maintenance; maintained as required Routine: N Pump Station Problems per 1 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Mechanical Problems: a Describe Your Force Main Hydrogen sulfide odors Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Hydrogen sulfide, treated with chemicals Odor Complaints per Month: Less than one Manhole Inspections ? Yes S Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 4,350 ,z Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Done by contractor Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No �+ Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes „y Concrete Finishing to Grade? Yes Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? a Stoppages: 1 Spills: 1 Odors: 1 Laterals: 1 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Call Contractor; Confine spill; vacu-olean; clean up debris, bleach Response Procedures: area; report to authorities r+ N ,d Seal Beach 211 8th St. - Seal Beach,CA 90740-6305 Pump Station Maintenance Low maintenance; maintained as required Routine: Pump Station Problems per 1 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Mechanical Problems: Describe Your Force Main Hydrogen sulfide odors Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Hydrogen sulfide;treated with chemicals Odor Complaints per Month: Less than one Manhole Inspections ? Yes e Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No ® Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 4,350 w Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Done by contractor Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes - Do You Use This Service? No Q, Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? Yes Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? w Stoppages: 1 Spills: 1 Odors: 1 Laterals: 1 d Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Call Contractor, Confine spill;vacu-clean;clean up debris; bleach Response Procedures: area; report to authorities w Seal Beach 211 8th St. Seal Beach,CA 90740-6305 How Many Sewage Spills Did 3 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No d Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No ® From Commercial/Industrial Customers? -- Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and WA Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?NIA Does Another Group (Besides the NIA Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? ti Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No, but desired Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? No Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Infiltration through old joints; inflow through manhole covers; curb-to-curb water in some areas. c, Contact for Long-Range Planning? Steve Badum, City Engineer-562-431-2527 ext. 317 Comments? AKM Engineers doing a rate study and Master Plan. Old Orangeburg pipe farm houses to property line. Main P.S. flows during rains go to 1.8-2 MGD from normal 1.1 MGD. ® Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 4 Miles: 1 Diameters 6 Miles: 7.7 Diameters 8 Miles: 25.7 Diameters 10 Miles: 0.8 Diameters 12 Miles: 1.4 Diameters 15 Miles: 1 Diameters 18 Mlles: 1.4 Diameters 24 Miles: 1.3 Stanton _ 7800 Katella Ave Stanton, CA 90680-3123 r Agency Contact: Mike Kim Title: Public Works Director/City Engineer Telephone: 714-379-9222 ext. 204 E-Mail: Fax: 714-890-1443 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 60 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 8", 12", 15", 21", 24" Major Changes Last Year: None v Maintenance Schedule: Semi-Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck u than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or Combo Truck Larger Unique Malnt Procedures/Equip? N/A Number of Field Staff? 2 Storrs Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Street maintenance and storm drain maintenance. Responsibilities? w Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? 0 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 10 0 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 12 's Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit; 0 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains Contractor Your Pump Stations: �^ Pump Station Monitoring: Daily w vy Stanton 7800 Katella Ave Stanton,CA 90680-3123 r Pump Station Maintenance Daily inspection of manhole and electrical panel. Switch vacuum Routine: pumps weekly. Clean wet well every six months. Pump Station Problems per 0 a Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main None ® Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: None Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? N/A Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Dispose at OCSD if needed Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No c, Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractors a. Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes, No fee Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole e Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? ti Stoppages: 0 Spills: 0 Odors: 1 Laterals: 0 ®' Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 1 Describe Your Sewage Spill Containment; removal and clean-up Response Procedures: I� Stanton 7800 Katella Ave Stanton,CA 90680-3123 e How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and NIA Work With? W Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle s Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No ` Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? No Computerized? No Describe Recent I& I Problems: Several streets were flooded curb-to-curb; New storm drain should K„ alleviate problems. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Mike Kim Comments? Problem with the City of Anaheim discharging directly into a 10- 12 -inch city owned sewer at Western Avenue which adds flow to city .« system. Redeveloper issues relating to laterals. Flow monitoring by OCSD crews may be desired. Mlles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997/98? P Diameters 8 Mlles: Unknown Diameters 12 Miles: Unknown Diameters 15 Miles: Unknown Diameters 21 Miles: Unknown Diameters 24 Miles: Unknown m Sunset Beach Sanitary District P.O. Box 1185 Sunset Beach,CA 90742-1185 .e Agency Contact: Ray E. Lewis Title: District Engineer Telephone: 949-497-1580 E-Mail: Fax: 949497-4905 — Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 6.3 Feet of Force Main? 1D95 Sewer Line Diameters: 4",6", 8", 10"VCP gravity;6"Cast Iron and PVC force mains Major Changes Last Year: Installed new parallel force main at Warner Ave and PCH; 245 linear feet of 6-inch PVC Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(National Plant Service) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15' or N/A Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? N//A Number of Field Staff? 0 Storm Drain Maintenance? No OtherStaff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes % CCTV Total System? 100-in 1977 % CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? Several Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 1 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 2 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No ' Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: —� Pump Station Monitoring: Complete instrumentation adjacent to pump stations at ground level Sunset Beach Sanitary District P.O. Box 1185 Sunset Beach,CA 90742-1185 Pump Station Maintenance Monthly Routine: r.� Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: None v� Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections 7 Yes v Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No .,, Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 875 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: We use OCSD Plant No. 2 disposal site Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes v Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractor w Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? No o-L Concrete Finishing to Grade? Yes Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? e Stoppages: 0 Spills: 0 Odors: 0 Laterals: 0 Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill N/A Response Procedures: w Sunset Beach Sanitary District P.O. Box 1185 Sunset Beach, CA 90742.1185 How Many Sewage Spills Did 0 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems Grease from restaurants From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group (Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? No Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? No Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Flows increased approximately 40%during the El Nino last year. .:, Contact for Long-Range Planning? Ray E. Lewis, District Engineer Comments? District has spent approx $500,000 during the past three years updating systems(pump stations, force mains, instrumentation, etc.) The District needs OCSD financial assistance in controlling the infiltration problem. The sewer system was built in 1936. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? Diameters 10 Miles: 1.88 Diameters 8 Miles: 2.06 Diameters 6 Miles: 0.76 u Diameters 4 Miles: 1.58 ,y Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780-3715 .. Agency Contact: Tim Serlet Title: Director of Public Works Telephone: 714-573-3152 E-Mall: Fax: 714-734-8991 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 35.54 Feet of Force Main? 0 Sewer Line Diameter 4"to 27" Major Changes Last Year: Residential on east side in IRWD's service area Maintenance Schedule: Every 18 months Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? OCSD by agreement Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-16"or Balling methods Larger Unique Malnt Procedures/Equip? HydroVapomoter, Gas gaps, Cable rig equipment for cleaning medium and large diameter pipes, Manhole sealing, Bio-degreaser Number of Field Staff? N/A Storm Drain Maintenance? No _ Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? .. Organizational Chart? N/A CWFA Collection Worker Certtf? N/A r Do You Use CCTV Inspection? N/A %CCTV Total System? 1 %CCTV Inspected Last Year? 5 '-' How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 44 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly How Many Siphons? 8 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Quarterly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 0 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: .> Pump Station Monitoring: N/A v Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780-3715 ® Pump Station Maintenance N/A Routine: Pump Station Problems per N/A Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: N/A w Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? N/A Sewer Debris Disposal Program: OCSD Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes Do You do Your Own Manhole N/A Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole ® Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? G Stoppages: 2 Spills: 1 Odors: 0 Laterals: 2 Frame and Cover: 1 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill OCSD uses the 5 C's and written reporting to regulatory agencies as Response Procedures: necessary. y Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin,CA 92780-3715 How Many Sewage Spills Did 6 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes r Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems OCSD by agreement e From Commercial/industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's Yes r Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and Various Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group (Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I& I Problems: Rain-related inflow in some areas G Contact for Long-Range Planning? Tim Serlet Comments? Contact Nick Arhontes (OCSD)714-593-7120 for O&M details; footage for Assessment District Seven(AD7)Is not Included in the totals this year. Sewers built and operated by AD7 are not included in the totals. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? Diameters 6" Miles: .04 Diameters 8" Miles: 32.5 Diameters 10" Miles: 2.08 w Diameters 12" Miles: .24 Diameters 15" Miles: .42 d Diameters 18" Miles: .23 Diameters 21" Miles: .03 Unincorporated Area 7 and Irvine Business Complex 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Agency Contact: Nick Arhontes Title: Manager, Collection Facilities O&M Telephone: 714-593-7120 y E-Mail: narhontes@ocsd.com Fax: 714-962-3071 a Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 152.72(Excludes Area 7) Feet of Force Main? 6,083 Sewer Line Diameter 4"to 27' Major Changes Last Year: Preliminary design for pump station improvements; design of Armstrong sewer in the Irvine Business Complex; abandoned Racquet Hill pump station and drained flow to IRWD HATS line. Maintenance Schedule: Every 18 months ,.� Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff and Contractor(Pro Pipe) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Trucks than 15" ® Maintenance Equipment-16"or Balling methods Larger Unique Maint ProcedureslEquip? Cable-rigged winch trucks for balling methods on medium and large ® lines; hydro-vaporooter truck for root foaming Number of Field Staff? 3.5 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Staff Maintenance Pump stations Responsibilities? m Organizational Chart? Yes CWFA Collection Worker Certif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? 3 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 1 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 5 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Every nine weeks How Many Siphons? 4 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Every nine weeks Types of Pump Stations: Dry Ph: 3 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: Leased phone line telemetry data monitoring to a 24-hr control/dispatch center in Fountain Valley'CRISP data management software Unincorporated Area 7 and Irvine Business Complex 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Pump Station Maintenance Preventive maintenance schedule on all mechanical, electrical, and Routine: instrumentation components;daily, weekly, monthly,quarterly, semi-annual,and annual maintenance schedules Pump Station Problems per 2 Month: Describe Your Pump Station Utility power, phone lines, pump ragging Problems: Describe Your Force Main None on these due to short mains Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Grease and low-velocity related odor problems in IBC gravity system Odor Complaints per Month: Two per month in the summer Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Fonns? Yes Maint Laterals to Property Lines? Yes Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? N/A Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Dump Combo trucks at OCSD Plant No. 2 Aware of OCSO Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? Yes Do You do Your Own Manhole Some Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Contractor Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes ,r Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: 1 Spills: <1 Odors: <1 Laterals: <1 Frame and Cover: <t Other: <1 Describe Your Sewage Spill Five C's per water policy: Control, contact, contain, calculate, cleanup Response Procedures: ,m Unincorporated Area 7 and Irvine Business Complex 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 How Many Sewage Spills Did 8 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented Yes Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? Yes Have You Had Recent Problems Yes .. From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's Yes Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and Various Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?Yes Does Another Group (Besides the No Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Per Uniform Plumbing Code in new facilities Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? Yes Describe Recent I & I Problems: Minor. Some inflow problems due to street runoff. Utilize manhole vent plugs in problem areas. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Chuck Winsor/Jim Herbelg in Engineering Comments? N/A Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997/98? Diameters N. Miles: 0.41 Diameters 6" Miles: 0.65 Diameters 8" Miles: 124.47 Diameters 101, Miles: 8.53 Diameters 12" Miles: 4.44 6' Diameters 15' Miles: 12.88 Diameters 161, Miles: 0.01 ,z Diameters 181, Miles: 0.78 Diameters 21" Miles: 0.08 Diameters 24"and 27" Miles: 0.35/0.12 Villa Park 17866 Santiago Blvd. Villa Park,CA 928614105 m Agency Contact: Fred Maley Title: City Manager Telephone: 714-998-1500 E-Mail: cityhall@ci.villa-park.ca.us Fax: 714-998-1508 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 27 Feet of Force Main? 0 a, Sewer Line Diameter 6", 8", 12"and 12"VCP Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Every two years Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Contractor(Walker) Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Hydroflusher than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15"or NIA Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? None Number of Field Staff? 0 in Sewer Maintenance m Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance Responsibilities? Street sweeping, landscape maintenance, minor street maintenance Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? No Do You Use CCTV Inspection? No %CCTV Total System? 0 %CCTV Inspected Last Year? 0 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 4 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Yearly or as needed How Many Siphons? 0 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? N/A Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pk: 0 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains M. E. Frederick Your Pump Stations: 19 Pump Station Monitoring: Periodic visual examination-no telemetry m m .d Villa Park 17866 Santiago Blvd. Villa Park,CA 92861.4105 Pump Station Maintenance Our contractor determines the routine Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Rare odor problems are solved by adding bleach to the manhole. r Odor Complaints per Month: 0 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No td Malnt. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 2,000 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Contractor disposes of debris and grease Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole No Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? .d Other Responsibility for This? Contractor Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair. Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: <t Spills: 0 Odors: 41 Laterals: <1 Frame and Cover: <t Other: <1 Describe Your Sewage Spill Sewer spills are handled by our contractor or city staff in an m Response Procedures: emergency. Small spills are mopped up with absorbent materials and disposed of in the trash. Large spills are contained and disposed of by the contractor or the County fire department. .e Villa Park 17856 Santiago Blvd. Villa Park,CA 92861-4105 How Many Sewage Spills Did 3 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No .m Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems Some grease from shopping center From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? ® Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle ,e Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge No Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? No Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent I & I Problems: Minor problems at Serrano and Banyan Contact for Long-Range Planning? City Manager or City Engineer Gary Johnson Comments? Approximately 55 more homes until buildout shared ownership with City of Orange in sewer line to handle future City of Orange Flows e^ from the east. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated In FY 1997198? Diameters 6 Miles: 0.5 Diameters 8 Miles: 22 Diameters 10 Miles: 0.5 ® Diameters 12 Miles: 4 Westminster 8200 Westminster Blvd. Westminster, CA 92683-3366 Agency Contact: Manvan Youssef Title: Public Works Director Telephone: 714-8 98-3311 E-Mail: Fax: 714-8954499 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? See Midway Cities SO Feet of Force Main? See Midway Cities SO s, Sewer Line Diameter See Midway Cities SO Major Changes Last Year: Housing tract with approximately 100 new units Maintenance Schedule: See Midway Cities SD — Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? See Midway Cities SD Maintenace Equipment-Smaller See Midway Cities SD than 15" m Maintenance Equipment-16" or See Midway Cites SO Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? See Midway Cites SD Number of Field Staff? N/A Storm Drain Maintenance? Westminster Staff Other Staff Maintenance Westminster Staff Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? Westminster Staff CWEA Collection Worker Certif? N/A Do You Use CCTV Inspection? See Midway Cities Sanitary District CCTV Total System? N/A CCTV Inspected Last Year? N/A 'ID How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? N/A Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? N/A How Many Siphons? N/A ® Siphon Cleaning Frequency? N/A Types of Pump Stations: Dry PiL• 3 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump NO ® Stations? Name of Contractor that Maintains WA Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: WA s, Westminster 8200 Westminster Blvd. Westminster, CA 92683-3366 ® Pump Station Maintenance See Midway Cities SD Routine: Pump Station Problems per See Midway Cities SD Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: N/A Odor Complaints per Month: Manhole Inspections? NIA Use Manhole Inspection Forms? N/A Maint Laterals to Property Lines? N/A ,b Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? N/A Now Many Lateral Connections? See Midway Cities SD Sewer Debris Disposal Program: See Midway Cities SD Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? N/A ,® Do You do Your Own Manhole NIA Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole See Midway Cities Sanitary District Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: N/A Spills: N/A Odors: N/A Laterals: N/A Frame and Cover: N/A Other: N/A Describe Your Sewage Spill Report all spills to Midway Cities Sanitary District for action. Response Procedures: Westminster 8200 Westminster Blvd. Westminster,CA 926833366 How Many Sewage Spills Did N/A You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented N/A d, Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? N/A Have You Had Recent Problems See Midway Cities SD From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No .e source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? m Do You Require Grease Traps? N/A Grease Trap Inspection Program? N/A Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? N/A Computerized? No Describe Recent I&I Problems: Minor issues by Chestnut(County channel)because flap gates closed. This channel is on an Orange County hot list for upgrade. Contact for Long-Range Planning? Marwan Youseff for land use and General Plan Comments? Midway Cities Sanitary District owns and operates the City of Westminster sewer system. Orange County Fire Authority can act as d a first responder on spills. All sewer plan checks are done by Midway Cities SD; Connection fees to OCSD. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY t 997/98? Diameters Miles: ea m r Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Ave. Yorba Linda,CA 92886-3364 Agency Contact: Jack Baecker Title: Public Works Superintendent Telephone: 714-961-7170 E-Mail: Fax: 714-986-1010 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 43 Feet of Force Main? 450 Sewer Line Diameter 8"to 18"(90% = 8" lines) Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Yorba Linda Water District Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" ® Maintenance Equipment-15' or Combo with large nozzle cleaner Larger Unique Maint ProcedureslEquip? N/A Number of Field Staff? 0 Storm Drain Maintenance? Yes Other Staff Maintenance N/A Responsibilities? Organizational Chart? No CWEA Collection Worker Certif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? <1 • CCTV Inspected Last Year? N/A How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 2 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 2 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 1 Does Stiff Maintain Your Pump No Stations? Name of Contractorthat Maintains Yorba Linda Water District Your Pump Stations: Pump Station Monitoring: See Yorba Linda Water District @, Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92886-3364 Pump Station Maintenance See Yorba Linda Water District Routine: Pump Station Problems per 0 a Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: Describe Your Force Main N/A Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: See Yorba Linda Water District Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? N/A Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No m Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 5,908 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: See Yorba Linda Water District ^" Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No ,r Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? Other Responsibility for This? Do You Require Traffic Permits for Yes Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair: Asphalt Cap? Yes Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: Spills: Odors: 1 Laterals: Frame and Cover: Other: See Yorba Linda Describe Your Sewage Spill See Yorba Linda Water District Water District Response Procedures: m Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Ave. Yorba Linda,CA 92886-3364 How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented N/A Maintenance System? Is it Computerized? N/A Have You Had Recent Problems Yorba Linda Water District From Commercial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the See Yorba Linda Water Distbct Sewer Maintenance Staff) Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? N/A Sewer Mapping? N/A Up to date? N/A Computerized? NIA Describe Recent I & I Problems: N/A ® Contact for Long-Range Planning? See Yorba Linda Water District Comments? Our system is maintained by the Yorba Linda Water District and is made up of primarily residential service hook-ups with few problems. ® Detailed map available at OCSD showing service areas. Send a copy of OCSD cleaning specs when available. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997198? Diameters 8" Miles: 40 Diameters 101, Miles: 1.0 Diameters 12" Miles: 0.9 Diameters 15' Miles: 0.6 Diameters 18, Miles: 0.5 s, Yorba Linda Water District 4622 Plumosa Dr. Yorba Linda,CA 92886.2416 Agency Contact: Lee Cory Title: Operations Superintendent Telephone: 714-701-1481 E-Mail: d Fax: 714-528-7027 Miles of Sanitary Sewer? 120 Feet of Force Main? 529 Sewer Line Diameter 6"to 21" Major Changes Last Year: None Maintenance Schedule: Annually Who Does Your Sewer Cleaning? Staff Maintenace Equipment-Smaller Combo Truck than 15" Maintenance Equipment-15" or Combo truck with large nozzle cleaner Larger Unique Maint Procedures/Equip? None Number of Field Staff? 3 Storm Drain Maintenance? No Other Stag Maintenance Responsibilities? Water maintenance repairs, stand-by, etc. Organizational Chart? Yes CWEA Collection Worker Certif? Yes Do You Use CCTV Inspection? Yes • CCTV Total System? N/A • CCTV Inspected Last Year? 10 How Many Sewer Trouble Spots? 9 Trouble Spot Cleaning Frequency? Monthly How Many Siphons? 13 Siphon Cleaning Frequency? Monthly Types of Pump Stations: Dry Pit: 0 Submersible: 1 Does Staff Maintain Your Pump Yes Stations? Name of Contractor that Maintains N/A Your Pump Stations: m Pump Station Monitoring: An alarm system for high level or pump failure is set up on the computer. A physical inspection is conducted once a week. Every month, floating debris is removed out of the wet well, and pumps are back-flushed if needed. ,., Yorba Linda Water District 4622 Plumose Dr. Yorba Linda,CA 92886-2416 Pump Station Maintenance See previous question Routine: Pump Station Problems per None Current e. Month: Describe Your Pump Station N/A Problems: m Describe Your Force Main None Problems: Describe Your Odor Problems: Flushing the lines regularly corrects most of the problems Odor Complaints per Month: 1 Manhole Inspections? Yes Use Manhole Inspection Forms? No Maint Laterals to Property Lines? No Maint. Laterals to Home/Business? No How Many Lateral Connections? 10,795 Sewer Debris Disposal Program: Empty truck in large OCSD trunk line. Remaining debris is mixed with dirt and sent to a disposal site. m Aware of OCSD Disposal Program? Yes Do You Use This Service? No Do You do Your Own Manhole Yes Frame and Cover Adjustment or Replacement? ti. Other Responsibility for This? N/A Do You Require Traffic Permits for No Manhole Frame and Cover Maint? City Requirement for Manhole Finish Frame and Cover Repair. Asphalt Cap? Yes a, Concrete Finishing to Grade? No Other? Sewer Complaints per Month? Stoppages: <1 Spills: <t Odom: 1 Laterals: 1 `tl Frame and Cover: 0 Other: 0 Describe Your Sewage Spill Following notification, crew responds to site with Combination Truck. Response Procedures: Crew leader makes assessment and directs crew in corrective action, m containment, cleanup, and reporting. m Yorba Linda Water District 4622 Plumose Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92886-2416 How Many Sewage Spills Did 2 You Have Last Year? Do You Have a Documented No ,y Maintenance System? Is It Computerized? No Have You Had Recent Problems No, but would like a list of industrial dischargers that OCSD maintains r From Commemial/Industrial Customers? Did You Need Help From OCSD's No m Source Control Division Last Year? If Yes,Who Did You Contact and N/A Work With? ,d Were You Satisfied With Their Help?N/A Does Another Group(Besides the N/A Sewer Maintenance Staff)Handle Point Source Issues? Do You Have a Grease Discharge Yes Ordinance? ' Do You Require Grease Traps? Yes Grease Trap Inspection Program? Yes m Sewer Mapping? Yes Up to date? Yes Computerized? No Describe Recent 181 Problems: None known Contact for Long-Range Planning? YLWD Engineering Department-Chuck Gray Comments? Our system is primarily residential,with few major problems. Need a program to get parcels off of septic tanks. 20%of parcels may be on .d septic tanks? See map of service area boundaries. Miles of Each Size of Sewers you Operated in FY 1997/98? Diameters V. Miles: 15.7 Diameters 8" Miles: 98.4 Diameters 12" Miles: 3.3 Diameters 18" Miles: 0.7 Diameters 151, Miles: 1.8 a+ Diameters 24" Miles: 0.4 H H H H H fl H H H H H H H H H H H I H OCSD Member City/Agency Collection System Survey - 1998 City/Agency: Address: Agency Contact: Title: FAX: Telephone: e-mail: la. How many miles of sanitary sewer lines are in your system in 1998? 1b. How many feet of force main are included? 1c. Describe any major changes you made this past year(length, size, new sewers, abandoned sewers, etc.) 2a. What are the diameters of the sanitary sewer lines you operated in 1998? 2b. How many miles of each diameter sewer line are there in your collection system? 3a. What is the maintenance schedule for cleaning your sanitary sewer lines? 3b. Who cleans your sanitary sewer lines? Staff:_ Contractor— (Name: 1 4a. What type of equipment is used for cleaning your sanitary sewer lines? 4b. How are you cleaning pipes greater than 15 inches in diameter? f1wpAWNguN1ebn 11y\1999 Survey Fo.11999 Survey Fo"As 1 H [ fl fl H fl 1 fl B fl 1 H H 1 fl l fl 1 fl 4c. Describe any unique procedures and/or equipment used in your sewer maintenance routine. 5a. How many field staff are in your sanitary sewer maintenance group? 5b. Does your staff maintain the storm drain system too? Yes_ No_ 5c. Can you provide us with an organizational chart of your sewer maintenance organization? Yes_ No 6a. Are these staff involved in other maintenance activities? Yes_ No_ 6b. If Yes, what type? 6c. Does your sanitary sewer staff have CWEA Collection Worker certification? Yes_ No 7a. Do you use CCTV inspection for your sanitary sewer lines? Yes_ No_ 7b. What percent of your sanitary sewer lines were inspected using CCTV last year? 7c. What percent of your total sanitary sewer system (in footage) has been inspected using CCTV? 8a. How many sanitary sewer trouble spots are there in your system? 8b. How often do you clean them? 8c. How many siphons are there in your system today? 8d. How often do you clean them? 9a. How many and what type of sewage pump stations do you have? 9b. Dry-pit— 9c. Submersible_ 9d. Who maintains them? Staff_ Contractors_ 9e. Explain how you monitor your pump station operating conditions. 9f. Explain your pump station maintenance routine. fAW.dW%gsaW1Olmcm11yX1998 Suwy Foam\1998 Survey FonAs 2 H l H H fl fl H fl fl fl H H fl fl H H H 1 fl 9g. Approximately how many pump station problems you have each month? Describe these. gh. Describe any problems you have with force mains. t0a. Describe any odor problems in your system and how you resolve them. 10b. How many odor complaints do you get per month?_ 11a. Do you perform manhole inspections during the sewer cleaning process? Yes:_ No: 11 b. Do you document manhole inspections on a form designed for this purpose? Yes: _ No: 12a. Do you maintain laterals to customer property lines? Yes:_ No: 12b. Do you maintain them to the home or business? Yes: _ No: _ 12c. Approximately how many lateral connections do you currently take flow from? 13a. How do you dispose of sewer debris and grease from sewer cleaning? 13b. Do you know about the OCSD sewer debris disposal program? Yes:_ No:_ 13c. Are you using this service? Yes: _ No: 14. Does your staff do your own pipe repair, and manhole frame and cover adjusting or replacement? Yes: No: 15. Do you require traffic permits for OCSD to replace OCSD manhole frames and covers in your city? Yes: No: f:hvp.elal9n\410Yncne1tyF1998 Survey Foam%1998 Survey FomAs 3 9 A H A A A H H H H A H A B A A A A A 16a. What do your city codes require for manhole finish frame and cover repair? 16b. Asphalt cap_ 16c. Concrete finishing to grade_ 16d. Other (specify) 17. How many sewer related complaints do you receive per year on the average? (list number of complaints per month for each category) Stoppages_ Odors_ Spills_ Lateral problems_ Frame and cover problems_ Other 18a. Describe your sewage spill response procedures. 18b. How many sewage spills (any size) did you have in FY97/98? (July 1, 1997 thru June 30, 1998) 1-5 6-10 11-15 15 + 19a. Do you have a documented Maintenance Management System? Yes_ No 19b. Is it computerized? Yes_ No 20a. Have you had any recent problems/events due to discharges from commercial/industrial customers such as high maintenance, back-up, debris build up, etc? If Yes, please explain. 20b. Have you needed to ask support from OCSD's Source Control Division last year? Yes_ No 20c. If so, who did you contact and work with? 20d. If so, were you satisfied with their response and help? Yes_ No_ 20e. Is there another group in your agency (besides the sewer maintenance staff) that handles point-source issues (commercial, industrial, business, etc?) Yes_ No 1:\wp,dla\gsaW l 0V cnelly\1998 Survey Foun\1998 Survey Form.xls 4 1 I 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 fl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 20f. Do you have a grease discharge ordinance in your agency/city? Yes_ No 20g. Do you require grease trapsfinterceptors? Yes_ No_ 20h. If yes, do you have an inspection/maintenance program for these? Yes_ No 21a. Do you have a sewer mapping system? Yes_ No 21 b. Is it up to date? Yes_ No_ 21c. Is it computerized? Yes_ No 22. Describe your Infiltration/Inflow problems in last year's (El Nino) wet weather, including wet weather related spills. 23a. Do you use trenchless technologies_or new construction_in sewer rehabilitation work? 23b. Would you be interested in attending a workshop on trenchless technologies? Yes_ No_ 24a. Are you aware of the OCSD Cooperative Projects Program? Yes_ No_ 24b. Do you know if your city/agency is planning on submitting a project this year? Yes_ No_ 25. Who is your city/agency's contact for long-range sanitary sewer system planning? 26. Comments: f:vap.dtalgsa1410%mme(1y11998 Survey FormN998 Survey Form.vls 5 OCSD Contacts Nick Arhontes Ph: 714-593-7210 _ Manager, Collection Facilities O&M FAX: 714-962-3071 E-Mail: narhontes@ocsd.com Mike McCusker Ph: 714-593-7212 Planner, Collection Facilities O&M FAX: 714-962-3071 E-Mail: mmcusker@ocsd.com Patrick McNally Ph: 714-593-7163 Senior Management Analyst, GSA FAX: 714-962-3071 E-Mail: pmcnelly@ocsd.com _ Adrian Renescu Ph: 714-593-7435 Senior Engineer, Technical Services Dept. FAX: 714-962-6957 E-Mail: arenescu@ocsd.com m Orange County Sanitation District, P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 1 ATTENTION: CITY OFFICIALS AT THE UPCOMING LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1999 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AT THE SAN JOSE CONVENTION CENTER OCTOBER 10-12 KEYNOTE SESSION: THE REBUILD AMERICA COALITION HEAR THE MESSAGE FROM THE REBUILD AMERICA COALITION, THE STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS REGARDING THE NEED FOR STEWARDSHIP OF OUR AGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE DRAMATIC EFFECT NEGLECT HAS UPON THE HEALTH OF A ECONOMY AS WELL AS QUALITY OF LIFE. SPONSORED BY THE LEAGUE AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION Rehulld.doc a/07/14/99 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE REBUILD AMERICA COALITION CONCURRENT KEYNOTE SESSION MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 9-10 AM (EXPECT 400 APPROX. ATTENDEES) PROPOSED SYNOPSIS OF SESSION FOR CONFERENCE BROCHURE: Our nation has faced major challenges, such as hunger, crime, drugs, education, health care and the environment. However, until recently, we have continued to avoid another major problem — our failure to properly manage our massive investment in the infrastructure. Municipal governments across the nation are beginning to face this challenge to our economic health, as well as our quality of life. Infrastructure may be defined as "Capital Assets Owned by a Municipality that Require On-Going Maintenance and Eventual Replacement". This Session will discuss the Rebuild America Coalition's goal of encouraging various sectors of government to become better stewards of the infrastructure — a valuable asset. ReWid Am No 711 V99 1�a0 boa AA q/-7i/vY July 12, 1999 From, Arthur D. Nowsham 5321 Grandview Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92886 716-777-6089 TO: FANS. Committee SUBJECT: Item 813d FAHR99-58 on FAHR Committee Meeting Agenda for July 14,1999. Sewer Connection Fee Waiver Request From City of Yorba Linda Homeowners Speaking on behalf of my three neighbors and myself, I hereby express disagreement with the GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION as well as the ALTERNATIVES provided in the final section of the FARR Committee Agenda Report prepared by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Director of Finance. Point N1. Examination of Attachment R to the Agenda Report indicates that this Notice of Public Hearing was bulk mailed in March or April 1990 and was not enclosed with the property tax bill. The notice did not highlight the significance of not being connected to the sewer. Its focus was to notify the public of OCSD'S intent to use the property tax rolls to collect a sewer charge for providing sewer service to all properties within the area!phen included as Attachment B to the Agenda Report the Finance Department blocked out and used an arrow to highlight the section of the public notice that related to properties not connected to the sewer. Obviously the OCSD knew numerous homeowners in Sanitation District No. 2 were not connected to the sewer system and should have made an effort to exclude them when implementing an arbitrary cost-saving approach for the collection of a new sewer charge. The OCSD made no effort to notify homeowners when mailing the property tax billings in late 1990 or in subsequent years. Point R2. When in 1990 the OCSD Finance Department received a request for tax exemption they, as stated in paragraph 1 on page 3 of the Agenda Report, "requested verification from the Yorba Linda Water District that these parcels were in fact not connected to the local mower system. Due to the number of calls that Yorba Linda Water District was receiving from the District's Finance Department, they provided a computer listing of all property addressee within Yorba Linda that were not connected. . . Finance staff then used this listing as a verification tool against all written requests. . .... At this point in 1990 the OCSD Finance Department had all the information necessary to correct the error on the property tax rolls and recognized their responsibility for implementing the necessary corrections. Very simply the Yorba Linda Water District list eliminated any need for individual written requests. ,x ���� i ,,�ui�., ��ti� �;.� , �..�-m,[� �J�1,� td-i.1re,,...� Based on paragraph 2 on page 3 of the Agenda Report over 74 percent (662/890) of the affected homeowners in Yorba Linda have still not been removed from the Revenue Area No.2 sewer taxation roll. Using the calculations in Paragraph 3 on page 3 of the Agenda Report, this yields over $460,000 that the OCSD Finance Department will have collected through tax year 1999-00 by intentionally not taking corrective action. Furthermore, they were also aware that their initial approach to identifying Yorba Linda homeowners who should not be taxed was only 25 percent effective. Corrective action should have been taken in 1990 not 19991 Point M3. The accounting practice of the OCSD Finance Department should be held to a standaid that is at least equivalent to that imposed on an Orange County property tax payer by the County Treasurer- Tax Collector. For late payment of the property tax bill to Which the sewer fee was arbitrarily added, a 10 percent penalty, a $10 annual cost fee and 1.5 percent interest compounded monthly on the unpaid balance are charged. The value of the improperly charged sewer fee with penalties, coat fees and interest compounded over 9 years exceeds my sewer connection fee ($1860) as recommended in paragraph 2 on page 3 of the Agenda Report. In a different venue, the penalties could be even higher if the over-collection was determined to be intentional based on demonetrated knowledge of improper fee collection and for over 9 years refusing to implement corrective action. Point q4. Based on California law all rights and privileges to n property are transferred to the new property owner unless specifically identified in the Grant Deed. The Revenue Area No. 2 sewer taxation fee is not normally referenced or inferred on the Grant Deed. It is not identified on our Grant Deeds. Therefore any and all refunds or benefits go to the current property owner. With regard to correcting the overall problem, I applaud the OCSD Finance Department's recommendation to identify homeowners who are not connected to a local sewer system. However the Finance Department's self-assessment is expectedly superficial and consequently the recommended and alternative corrective action proposals for financial compensation fall far short of a fair resolution. The implementation of it. 3 from the ALTERNATIVES Section of the Agenda report is a good start. This alternative recommendation should be augmented with appropriate penalties as well as interest and should include an option to waive the sewer connection fee for a homeowner who connects to the local sewer within a reasonable time (12 months) . In closing, please review the letter addressed to the Chairperson of the OCSD Board of Directors from the Yorba Linda Water District. This letter requests that the sewer hookup fee for the four subject properties be waived. Please recommend implementation of this request. Thank you Art Newsham I YORBA LINDA 46M PLUMOSA DRIVE - P.O.BOX 309,YORBA LINDA,CALIFORNIA 928850309 U WATER DISTRICT PHONE:pulm-YLWD FAX:Q141701M13 July 12, 1999 Ms.Jan Debay, Chairperson ._ Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Subject: Sewer Connection Fee Waiver Dear Ms.Debay: On July 8, 1999,Mr. Art Newsham appeared before the Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors on behalf of himself,and his neighbors on Grandview Avenue in the City of Yorba Linda. Mr.Newsham requested this District's assistance in recovering sewer maintenance fees they paid even though the property is not connected to the sewer system. The Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors discussed the matter at length and voted unanimously to request that the Orange County Sanitation District 1)waive the sewer connection fees for the four residential homes located on Grandview Avenue;or alternative 2)apply the fees paid by each parcel,with interest,to the current property owner as a credit toward future sewer connection fees. Your consideration of this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Yorba Linda Water District Arthur C. Kom, / President cc Mr. John Gullixson,Mayor,City of Yorba Linda Don McIntyre,General Manager,Orange County Sanitation District BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARK ABRAMOWITZ PAUL R.ARMSTRONG SETTR.BARBRE MICHAEL J.BEVERAGE ARTHUR C.KORN GENERAL MANAGER(SECREfARY BUSINESS MANAGERIAUDITOR WILLIAM J.ROBERTSON BEVERLY META ' vV Vwe a ra�av aMaar�. �Ia�ea alaV a a.V. i. .l .�V • .rr v• • rr�.r ..��.....�. NOTICE OF PUSUC HEARING Notice is hereby given pursuant to California Health and Salary user fan This fee has been set at$55 per year(E4S8 a mouth)for Code Section 5473.1 of a public hearing to be held q'County remdec` 333 per year for apartment;and mobile banter, and SanSanitation Dlsthtlt No. 2 0l Orange County, ld-,California at $39 per 1,000/sq.It of building space Per year for commedal and m. an Wednesday,N umburt el customer with larger discharg"' User fees are act 7:30p. day,April 18, 1990 at the Orange Public used far new development Fees for new development are paid far Ubrary,located a[101 North Center Street,Orange,Cardomia. by the developer connecting to the eewer system. Said hearing is to be held for the purpose of reviewing written reports pertaining to the providing of sewer service for all City ongoing goal is to maintain elTective and efficient wastewater properties within County Sanitation District No.2, and to con- mamgementsesvicea Thecliallenges wemustcontinuallyfa®are sider public commends regarding use of the Cowry of Orange increasing service demands as population grows,and increasingly property tax roll for billing of District sewer service charges for stringent environmental regulations. The fees reDect the sewer collection,treatment and disposal services for the fiscal unmediate financial needs of your District,and will be reviewed year commencing July 1, 1990. and acUvated sa needed to continue protecting public health and nor limcmus envbonmmt PROPOSED BILLING AND COLLECTION METHOD te e Act sea cwa,w s -- . 7 County Sanitation District No. 2 is proposing to collect its sewer s r` k service use fee as a separate line item on the mnml property tax: �b brill. Useof this nmxeaaste8ective alternative method would allow the Districts sad its cuammers to save the sits of producing, 9E. reading and bandlmg separate utility bills for diced Payments lip •pro^tp .' "". `°''+°, S Every property owner within the District receive, an ennual property taitbinfrom the CauntyTa:Colleetar. Caldarnia8eaith and Safety Coda Section 6473 allows the District to pit=cu•sewer nwm o,vv a osarfmontbisbMmaaepar n meffem,thuaprovidingtheuser with the mweniense of including payment for District No. 2 sewerage service with property tar payments n6' tl Therefore, effective with the milling year beginning July 1, 1990, n the Board of Directors of District No. 2 a proposing to use this hining method to help keep the met of service down. The above s' noticed public hearing is to convder the Proposal to use the property tax bid to wn➢ the amuatsewer user fro imdead of a separate direct and more cosily hIIlmg method. 1[ FU ETHER INFORMATIMPUBLICWORKSHOPS The question and answer semen of this notice attempts to address some of the questions you may have In ndditian,two workshops have been scheduled where staff will provide mare detailed information and will be available to answer any additional Wastewater Item yaw home or business is collected by your local questions(see bank side of mailer for to—dons). street sewer system,which is mainta=ed by ymn•city w aanitary district The street sewers flow into large interceptor sewers in year axes owned by County Sanitation District Na 2. District Na. 2, the shaded area of the map,is one of nine Districts that make up the DISTRICT NO.2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, OPERATING FUND which serve the metropolitan area of the ai RESERVE d DEFICIT PROJECTION county.These Distride jsinttyown mdoperste the regional sewage treatment plants in 39 Fountain Valley and Huntington Bess+ The Do'B5E5 Sanitation Districts are charged with m protecting public health and the environment M cypRYoven a 9EVENUE The Sanitation Derriere operations are t 0 regulated by federal and state envuanmental L m DEFICIT agencies. In recent yeas,these agencies have RESERVES adopted and ice o p Posed IDora stringent laws end N 15 regulations m protect aor environment In order m comply with the new gal^ new t advanced sewage treatment faalidw meting to Otpetsm REVENUE hundreds of million of dollars, have been constructed The additional facilities have s rvsultod in increased operating ccerts 0 Rising testa and decreasing reserves, were ar.a6 98-99 e9.90 90.91 91.92 s.v 919e forcing District No.2 into a Swrdal crisis by FISCAL YEAR 1990 (see graph). To continue providing the high lovel of service you are accustomed to, District No.2 recently adopted a sewer service $3� QUULTIONS and ANSWERS ' T .2 1. Q Who B I fool I NOSY be eremq from the S. Q is tear money to be used for Upending owes? the gym"m scmnmeama more q. A It You property tot cws edmNebeol glomh? ? sewer System.Ym are exempt.Simply A No.Now sews When are funded by 0 alach a copy a youmx bD m substamlal connection fees pact by e letter atucplaratbn end men E mtlM dMelopere of new con1eldw PMISCIS oretnge County S&Wanon DlMIo9,Beet and are connected to the seem. pppglll 11M.FWASIM Vaitey. CA 8. Q Can one district borrow frore another Don 8212&81 adjacent eLddd 11e1 may be mote 2. a lot pay a enable,for sews Service anox9ePy made? 1� ! $ an MY wont bill.to tlde a duplicate A W.Each a line districts is asepazoe hbyS O charge? WRY.The money bebp0lo the FIB .T#ls- A No.The sews ser0m charge You FICA' property owners of that dLcoa alone pay tla you mrvesctiattotlMbcol vrd came be laa�oans dtbkta. 0 sbem sawem operated end mabamned 7. Q I M%Vg cool under Propwmon 13 any o by ties city or a local sw9tary corks, khctease in loxes required voter @5 Tlwk¢ewer ayalem cauheos to tea apprao. District No.2 trunk sawn sysmm.The A The use fees da M require a vde MOM No.2 fee will be used Is pay for 'der Proposition 13.11 Is fee of use, a Yam■ Ma OlmdsY regional Wyk sews ad M a tax.Wow follutloo control the regional"M-M ad ctpmel rogu mbFu manared by the real located In FoaWatn Valley end Enviraaeental PrnlaebM Agency(EPA) ea�a Numagtm veadn ma baapm ad ad 5tme heeahbws tagtlre usb ryRY'771 heo end eefay ospose a Wu meat conarn pu01b lesamh Marxi o. woemwaer. The tees wW pFMm sufficient tuna to 2, Q I already pay a Maps to yes mabWnm mum roses manared requeemaw, my art big.WhymWlar MOnge? protect ma heooh of One public end keep A The dsrga You currently Pay m your lea ouwoeradean. NJ is la repayment of bons Bees many 8. Q Are Owe aherways to corset mass years no to pay for construction of Imo wkhsa treating town on sot tax some of rile mceNes you are noes'Meng, bW The new charges won Pry for operating, ♦ Yes.The Dtbict could establish maintaining and rehaN kming the sepiwW&M bri and coseslon t6� eatmlg sewerage eye=facill bUlIng ystemsmaaagmWkq suM 4. O ono doyou mum by rehablNmbnT bgNFng systems ward Yave37e the lase A Marry 96gmaa6 a Ilk sows"M cons 15 to M percent ter ths Malaga crosbmmd more then 3O years ago twaneownW. end may delerbr e w calll as they gro We wan Mdnndthayfa a'M pass, vYwn.aa gaLLbruorwYb arWhw+'•—scaS� mgkbg yMVimpowemPda W tlMdM sxM4ng D ealR II,PalenbndaidlaQmLL knee and pump matlo s. WORKSHOP NO.1 WORKSHOP N0.2 wbran Yuseum coaxer Back.Bwloeng 301 North Pomace AvamM 201 tick&¢mad Y stye FWbnm Cara Placwnca H $ TIIESDAY.YANDN 1],11MO 7Aa PY TNUBSDAY,MASCN 22.is9O 7:00 PY p PUBLIC HEARING P Y m orange 6 1 North Center Straot 10 Cloy at Orange WEONERMY,APNLL 18,10O 7.3O PM ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Board secretary l ( oo July 15, 1999P1e5 no tat,=1) phone: 0141962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors milling address: PO. en.ate) Subject: Board Letter Fountain Valle,CA 92)28-812) '4ieci°°r"" The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 10844streeEllis Avenue Y Y 9 Fountain volley,ca information on any of the items, please call me. 92]ae-)ate Delay on Board Consideration of California Water Bond Resolution of Su000rt Manager The Steering Committee and the OMTS Committee have been briefed on the Agencies, proposed California Water Bond. It is now in the form of Assembly and Senate bills • awaiting further action after the summer recess. If approved by the legislature and Cities the Governor, the State's voters will consider a bond issue during the March 2000 primary election. As currently drafted, the bills provide $1.8 billion for water, Anelami groundwater, riparian and wetlands related projects in the form of loans and grants. Brea Buena Park gvraaa In their present forms, where and how the money is to be spent is not enumerated— Fountain Valley with the minor exception of some flood protection for the Bay Delta area. For most of Fullerton P P Y Garden crave the state, broad programmatic categories are described in the bills. All of the projects Handngron Beach which the Santa Ana River Watershed and Orange County stakeholders have Irvine expressed interest could fit within these programmatic categories. Joe Grindstaff, Le Habra P P 9 9 Lo Palli General Manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, has been the Loa Alamitos principal spokesman for our region, proposing projects totaling $430 million. Newport Beech Orange However, without specific language in the California Water Bond or other form of Pleceno. assurances, there is no certainty that Orange County and the Santa Ana River Bents Ana Watershed will receive an equitable and proportional share of the bond's proceeds. seen Beach 9 P P Swanton iOSe, The OMTS Committee has approved a conditional resolution of support and placed it tens Perk on this month's agenda for consideration b the Board. The resolution seeks specific roVa nark 9 Y P earmarks for the Santa Ana River watershed and Orange County. Although staff has county of orange received some conflicting advice regarding the need for earmarking, it is apparent that some form of earmarking is in the best interest of Southern California water users. sanitary Districts costs Mo. Midway city Huntington State Beach Closure Water Olstrli is Based on data from OCSD's sudzone monitoring program, the Orange County Health Irvine Ranch Care Agency (OCHCA) closed nearly a mile of Huntington State Beach on July 1, 1999. Because the closure was due to suspected sewage contamination, the District had a video inspection contractor at the beach to check the integrity of the Huntington State Beach on-site sewers and the OCSD Regional sewer lines in the vicinity. By 'To Protect the Publ,e Hoesch and the Envroment ehraogh Excellence in Malyhyster Sye[ems' Members of the Board Page 2 July 15, 1999 July 9, with less than half of the state-owned sewerage system inspected, a significant line separation was located in the lateral from the State Park's Restroom #7. This restroom is near the intersection of Magnolia and Coast Highway and approximately 1,000 feet from surtzone monitoring station 9N. Station 9N is the surfzone station that is exceeding monitoring limits. It is anticipated that the video inspection of the state-owned facilities will be completed before July 16. State Parks is contracting with the District to repair the broken sewer pipe at Restroom#7. The District will utilize one of its pre-qualified small-diameter repair contractors to accomplish this work. OCSD will also provide the State with an inspector. Costs for video inspection, cleaning, repair and the inspectors time will be reimbursed. If the Notice to Proceed is received, repair could begin as soon as July 16 and only take a few days. Because this separation may not be the only source of contamination, OCHCA will keep the beach closed until this fix is complete, and monitoring demonstrates bacteria levels at the beach have returned to background. Video inspection of the OCSD Regional trunk line should be completed by July 22. Newport Dunes Nuisance Flow Diversion The Regional Water Quality Control Board issued an Administrative Civil Liability (ACL) against the District requiring a payment of$50,000 as the result of the July 1998 sewage spill into Newport Harbor when a contractor punctured a District pressure main. Staff has negotiated an administrative resolution to the matter, which includes the District taking the lead on a project to divert summer flows from a storm drain that empties underwater at the swimming beach at the Newport Dunes Resort. An interim diversion pump system was put into place. The nuisance Flow is now being put into a sewer at the boat wash ramp. A Sanitation District and City of Newport Beach team is currently evaluating a permanent system that includes debris separation and gravity re-routing of the flow to the local sewer. Bacteria levels have decreased to the point where the Orange County Health Care Agency has opened the swimming beach. Because these new facilities need to be located on private property, Hyatt Hotel and Dunes Resort staff will be brought into the discussions. A preliminary design, with consensus of all stakeholders, is expected by the end of July. A consulting engineer will be retained to provide final design and construction documents. Members of the Board Page 3 July 15, 1999 Ford AFV Sales Up This Year as Automaker Continues to Lead Industry Ford Motor Company announced on Monday that U.S. fleet sales of its alternative fuel vehicles rose more than 24 percent for the 1999 model year. To highlight the significance of these figures, Ford compared its AFV sales pace with the entire industry's sale of light trucks, which grew 7 percent over the same period. 'These figures prove that Ford is dedicated to marketing and selling vehicles that reduce smog-forming emissions and greenhouse gases,' says Ron Robbins, Executive Director of North American Fleet Marketing. "While still low volume numbers, we want to highlight the fact that customer acceptance of these vehicles continues to grow. That's why we are in the AFV market for the long haul." Ford currently offers more alternatives in AFVs than any other automaker in the world. In the U.S., Ford offers 11 alternative fuel cars and light trucks that run on natural gas, propane, ethanol or electricity. In a related story, on Tuesday, after inviting German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder to drive a zero emission Ford P2000 HFC fuel cell car, Ford Chairman William Clay Ford, Jr. declared Ford a leader in the"Clean Revolution.""While my great- grandfather was a leader in the first industrial revolution, 1 want Ford Motor Company to be a leader in the second industrial revolution -the Clean Revolution," said Mr. Ford at the opening of Ford's new $35M European advanced research center. 'To achieve his vision, Henry Ford had declared customers could have whatever color they wanted, as long as it was black. To achieve my vision, I am declaring customers can have any vehicle they want, as long as it is green."— Ford State of the County's Wastewater Infrastructure Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the 1998 Member City/Agency Wastewater Collection Facilities O&M Survey. The information in the booklet was gathered from a survey that staff sent last fall to the manager of your agency's wastewater collection system and from follow-up meetings with your staff. If you have any questions, please contact Nick Arhontes at 714.593.7210. Kern County Biosolids Ordinance Kern County released its final Draft Ordinance (Ordinance) on May 13, 1999. The Ordinance allows the continued land application of Class B biosolids for three years, albeit under onerous regulatory requirements. During this three-year period, costs associated with additional soil and biosolids monitoring and road mitigation fees Members of the Board Page 4 July 15, 1999 required in the ordinance would result in an increase in biosolids management costs of approximately$8.00 per ton. At the end of three years, the Ordinance bans the land application of Class B biosolids in Kern County. Attorneys representing the Los Angeles County Sanitation District, City of Los Angeles and the District submitted CEQA-based comments on the Ordinance. These comments strongly recommend that Kem County must prepare an environmental impact report due to the significant environmental effects of the proposed ban. The District submitted numerous technical comments, CEQA-based comments, and provided volumes of documents supporting the land application of Class B biosolids. It was also recommended that Kern County defer its CEQA review pending the findings of the State Water Resources Control Board statewide biosolids EIR. Kem County staff is in the process of preparing an initial study to determine the level of CEQA review necessary for the Ordinance. Their decision on the level of review required should be made by mid-July. Kem County staff has indicated that they will perform a mitigated negative declaration. Such a decision by Kem County is expected to be challenged. Certification of the mitigated negative declaration is expected to be made by the Kern County Board of Supervisors at their September 1999 meeting. The final Ordinance is scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2000. Statewide Draft EIR for Biosolids Land Application The Statewide Biosolids Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR)was released on June 25, 1999. The purpose of the Draft EIR is to inform the public about impacts or potential impacts of the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) proposed General Order regulating the land application of biosolids. The General Order will establish a notification and permit review process for persons and public entities intending to land apply biosolids. The General Order also defines discharge prohibitions, discharge and application specifications, transportation and storage requirements, and general procedures and provisions to which all land appliers would be required to adhere. The Draft EIR identifies"environmentally superior alternatives" and recommends mitigation measures beyond that existing in the proposed General Order in order to reduce potential impacts to less than significant. With a few exceptions, the proposed General Order and the mitigation measures suggested in the Draft EIR would allow for the continued land application of Class B biosolids in California under a rigorous, science-based regulation . The General Order does not preempt local or county ordinances. The SWRCB will produce a Final EIR to address comments on issues raised by interested parties and individuals. District staff will provide comments on the proposed General Order and Draft EIR. The Executive Summary of the Draft EIR is attached for your review. Copies of the complete version of the Draft EIR, including the proposed General Order, are also Members of the Board Page 5 July 15, 1999 available. Public hearings to solicit additional public input have been scheduled on August 16, in Palmdale, August 17, in Bakersfield, and August 23, in Sacramento. The EIR must be certified by the SWRCB by October 2000 in order to comply with a court order. If you have any questions, please call Layne Baroldi at 714.593.7456. Odor Control Summer Readiness Plan The collection and treatment of wastewater results in the generation of odors, specifically in the form of hydrogen sulfide. The District has a well-established program of controlling odors, which include chemical treatment both in the collection systems and at the treatment plants. Approximately 20% of Operation & Maintenance's (O&M) budget is spent on controlling sulfides and odors. Even with our well-defined odor control program, odors still occur which are offensive to our surrounding neighbors. The greatest incident of odor complaints typically occurs during the summer season due to higher wastewater temperatures. Because of this staff developed an Odor Control Summer Readiness Plan (Plan). The purpose of this Plan is to provide the O&M staff with guidance on how to operate and maintain the odor control facilities during the peak odor season. In addition, the Plan documents steps taken throughout the year to reduce the impact of odors during the warmer season. As an example, staff developed and implemented a management plan this past year for sealing odorous manholes and storrndrains at both plants, which has significantly reduced fugitive odors. In addition to documenting what has already been accomplished, the Plan also describes future work that is planned to achieve higher levels of odor control. An example is a study to evaluate the effects of wastewater flow rate and chemical pretreatment on odor emissions from Plant 1's trickling fillers. The trickling filters are an occasional source of odors to residents west of the treatment plant and currently there is no odor control for this process. Staff within the plants odor control team will develop the Plan. The team is comprised of O&M field and technical support staff. Southern California Water Committee (SCWD) Declares Position on CALFED The SCWC has recently taken a position on a desired outcome of the CALFED process. As you will recall, CALFED is a multi-year, multi-agency effort that is attempting to reconcile the competing needs of water in the Sacramento/Bay Delta area of California. I have attached a "SCWC Telegram" that outlines its position. Incidentally, we recently joined SCWC and intend to become involved in the substantive public policy discussions that SCWC addresses as part of its charter. Members of the Board Page 6 July 15, 1999 Newport Submarine Canyon Numerous submarine canyons are found along the continental shelf off mainland southern California. Canyons can both facilitate the transport of sediment and organic matter across the continental shelf and serve as sites of sediment deposition and contaminant accumulation. In addition, they can be the focal point of localized upwelling, bringing subsurface waters to, or nearer, the surface. The District's outfall is sited between two such canyons—the San Gabriel and Newport Canyons. Newport Canyon is of particular interest because the head of the canyon begins within about 500 feet from shore adjacent to the Newport Pier and the canyon cuts across the shelf. The water depth at the canyon head is about 12 feet and is accessible to swimmers, surfers, and other water contact users. Evidence that the Newport Canyon has been impacted by the District's effluent has been found in both water quality measurements (e.g., salinity and fecal coliform bacteria) and sediment geochemistry(sewage tracers). For example, a study done in 1992—1993 found fecal coliform bacteria at depth within the canyon. The presence of subsurface bacteria coupled with an increasing gradient to our outfall indicated that the outfall was the probable source. In addition, the Newport Canyon contains an interim (scheduled to be permanent) EPA dumpsite (LA3) that has received dredge material from the Upper Newport Bay and Dana Point Harbor and may receive dredge materials from other dredging projects. The District needs to gain a better understanding of the hydrodynamics of the two canyons within our study area. This is especially true of the Newport Canyon since it cuts across the continental shelf and may act as a conduit of water and effluent to and from the shelf. Presently the District has several monitoring projects that are looking at conditions near and within the Newport Canyon. Our continued shoreline and expanded offshore microbiological monitoring should provide better tracking of the wastewater plume. Associated with these efforts are more focused special studies, such as the Plume Tracking Strategic Process Study where we will measure the size and location of the plume under various oceanographic conditions. We are also studying sediment and contaminant transport to and within the canyon from the District's outfall and from the LA3 dumpsite. In particular we are interested in evaluating how impacts from the LA3 dumpsite commingle with District's effluent effects. Finally, the geography of the Newport Canyon has been poorly characterized. This is due to the sparseness of water depth data coupled with the very narrow and steep features of the Newport Canyon. This past spring, the District was a sponsor of a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) ocean floor-mapping project of the San Pedro Shelf that included the Newport Canyon. Results from this study have, among other things, v " Members of the Board Page 7 July 15, 1999 shown that the Newport Canyon is actually a complex of 20 canyons and that the main arm is actually two canyons that join into a single canyon about 3000 feet from shore. Our special studies will provide the District with better and more reliable water quality information and depth data and improve our understanding of the movement of our plume near Newport Canyon. Dairy Washwater Pilot Project Background The Chino Basin dairy area is located upstream from the Prado Dam in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The approximately 300,000 dairy cows in this area produce about 5.1 million tons of corral manure (33% solids) a year. Dairy manure contains salts of which about half are not plant nutrients. The soil and groundwater are potentially exposed every year to about 380,000 tons of total salts from corral manure over the entire dairy area. Portions of these salts are dissolved in dairy washwater, which is typically plumbed to a holding pond and then used as irrigation water. Approximately 16.5 million gallons of washwater are disposed in this manner throughout the Chino Basin Dairy area every day. This daily activity adds over 169 tons of salts and nutrients to the soils and groundwater(about 62,000 tons of salts per year). Land application of manure and washwater in excess of agronomic needs over the years has caused the pollution of the overlying soil and the Chino groundwater basin with salts, including nitrates. Because the Santa Ana River, in part, feeds from the groundwater basin, the river has undergone a gradual degradation of its water quality. Occasional spills of washwater and storm runoff is also cause of major concem as the Santa Ana River is the source of about 75% of the drinking water used in Orange County. Objective In order to reduce the salt load into the groundwater and into the River, the Dairy Washwater Pilot Project is studying the feasibility of diverting up to 500,000 gallons per day of pretreated dairy wastewater to the existing Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) trunkline. Each of the sewer connections will be equipped with a monitoring port, flow totalizer, and a gate valve to deny any access to the sewer of dairy wastewater during heavy downpours. Initially the project has plans to sewer seven dairies, three in Riverside County and four in San Bernardino County to gather more data on the actual salt impact of dairy washwater to the environment and to assess the best pretreatment options. Based on this assessment, more dairies could follow in the future. Members of the Board Page 8 July 15, 1999 Progress Report Several meetings have been held among the project team members comprised of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), OCSD, and the operators of the seven dairies interested in participating in the project. Two of the seven dairies were monitored in April for three days each in order to establish an expected influent water quality based on existing pretreatment systems at a typical Chino dairy. Staff from SAWPA, IEUA, and OCSD has held several meetings to coordinate efforts regarding permitting, billing, financing, and engineering aspects of the project. All planning and design aspects of the project were completed before the target date of July 1, 1999. However, dairy operators so far have been reluctant to commit to the projected connection expenses. These costs average in the range of$37,000 and $52,000. The dairy operators, through the Milk Producers Council, are also in the process of placing the on-site construction portions of the project up for bid. For our next meeting with dairy operators, staff has prepared a comparison table, which will illustrate the benefits of being connected to the SARI line especially in light of recent RWOCB manure spreading prohibitions. We hope that this information, along with the results from the bid, will help the interested dairies decide whether to connect to the District's sewer system. Legislative Update I am enclosing a copy of CASA's July 2 Legislative Update. Item II, Bill to Increase Directors'Compensation, has a direct impact on the Board. At last report, it was moving without opposition through the committees. AS 1450: Currently there is proposed legislation, AS 1450, that would allow air pollution control districts (APCDs) to regulate biosolids composting and would invite requirements for unreasonably costly controls based on the assumption of nuisance potential. It will also create a new environmental crime. This crime would be based on the emission of any air pollutant or substance "that causes injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to a considerable number of persons or the public,"from biosolids composting. AS 1450 has been written specifically to target biosolids composting; meanwhile, other activities such as green waste, agricultural waste, wood chip, and manure composting, which may have similar emissions, would be unaffected. District staff prepared a letter for the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) opposing this bill. If approved, the bill would create another layer of regulatory oversight for biosolids management (the state Integrated Waste Management Board currently regulates composting operations) and invite costly air quality controls based on the assumption of nuisance potential. Michael Moore, the District's compliance manager, attended the Senate Committee on Environmental Y Members of the Board Page 9 July 15, 1999 Quality during the hearing of AB 1450 on July 12, 1999 to provide expert testimony and support for CASA's position. Due to strong opposition, the bill was pulled from the meeting agenda, and will be rescheduled for a separate hearing. Safe and Healthy Communities Initiative This proposed initiative would require a two-thirds vole of the people to approve a County of Orange project, such as a jail, waste landfill or airport. I've been advised that OCWD's General Counsel believes that it would not apply to the GWR System since it is not a 'county' project. OCSD Booth Wins Overall Best of Show at O.C. Fair For the first time since we have been participating at the Orange County Fair, the Sanitation District booth was awarded a First Place ribbon for Overall Best of Show. We also received three other First Place ribbons for excellence in Education, in Interactive Program (computer information), and in Friendly, Knowledgeable Personnel, A Fourth Place ribbon was awarded for Theme and Decorations. The theme of this year's Fair is Join the Rush, a solute to the Gold Rush Days. Our booth was titled "OCSD— Protecting Orange Countys Golden Coast" and featured a full-size outhouse and a full-size replica of our outfall. Two computer terminals, one with a program specially designed for children, gave booth visitors a virtual tour of the plant. Visitors could also play"Wastewater Jeopardy,"which tested their knowledge of our processing systems. An aquarium, filled with specimens of marine life, was included in our 20' x 20' booth, as was the tabletop model of the treatment plant. On judging day our District mascot Clean Water Willie (Fawn Elizondo) and Operator Joe (Jim Herberg)welcomed children into our booth. Ingrid Hellebrand of the Communications Department is responsible for coordinating our O.C. Fair efforts. She and the entire Fair Committee, along with all employees who contributed their time, should be praised for their award-winning efforts. Directors are encouraged to slop by our booth, which is located in the Orange County Building. Legislators' Day a Bio Success Assemblyman Dick Ackerman and individuals representing every elected official from both the Sacramento and the Washington, D.C. delegations attended the District's Annual Legislators' Day on June 25. They, along with nearly 60 other guests, heard y Members of the Board Page 10 July 15, 1999 presentations on California water issues, Orange County growth and infrastructure needs, and how the District will meet those future demands as outlined in our Strategic Plan. Guests also heard updates on the Chino Basin dairy situation and on our proposed Groundwater Replenishment System. A bus tour of the plant followed the two-hour presentations. Special thanks go to guest speakers MET Board member Jerry King, OCWD General Manager Bill Mills, and to Jim Silva. We received many positive comments from those attending Legislators' Day and plan on holding a similar event next year. Recent Odor Complaints Wastewater treatment and solids handling processes at the two plants generate odors, most commonly in the forth of hydrogen sulfide. Even with the extensive facilities we have to control odors, odors still occasionally occur which are offensive to our surrounding neighbors. Several odor complaints were received during the period of June 18 through July 12. A brief discussion of the complaints, suspected causes and steps taken to resolve the problems are provided below. The Fountain Valley facility received one odor complaint on June 18, The complainant described the odor as smelling like sauerkraut. Operations staff implemented the Odor Evaluation Procedure, which consisted of investigating all potential odor-generating processes at the plant and documenting whether or not they were the source of odor. All processes were identified as operating normally. Staff visited the resident who complained of the odor and no odors were detected at that time. Based upon our investigation, staff is unsure whether or not we were the source of the odor compliant. The Huntington Beach facility received three odor complaints during this time period. The first came at 9 a.m. July 2. The caller indicated that the odor was nauseating. At 5:15 p.m. that same day the South Coast Air Quality Management District inspected the plant because of a series of odor complaints received the Air Quality Management District from residents across from Plant 2. The plant was thoroughly checked by Operations staff. The source of odor was identified as a load of material collected from the primary basins at the Fountain Valley plant and then transported to the Huntington Beach Plant drying beds for dewatering. The material was immediately transported offsite for disposal. After the incident, staff reviewed and corrected the procedure on handling similar material in the future to eliminate odors. Members of the Board Page 11 July 15, 1999 On July 7 the plant received an odor complaint at 7:20 in the evening. The caller indicated that the odor was a plant odor. Operation staff completed the Odor Evaluation Procedure. The investigation revealed that the bleach chemical feed system had malfunctioned and was not delivering bleach to the scrubbers for odor control. Staff suspected that the lack of bleach in the odor scrubbers could have resulted in the odor complaint. However, there is no way to be absolutely sure this was the source of odor. Staff corrected the problem to the bleach feed system. Increased Property Assessments Result in Hioher Revenues Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reports that the higher property assessments will increase the District's revenue by approximately $720,000 over the budgeted $32.9 million. The 1999-2000 budget assumed a 5% increase; however, the assessments actually rose 7.3%. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. 455/ Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt M\WP.OTANOMIMOMWFMLLE RS TO ME RPW' MWOOL Attachments v Executive Summary Introduction The California State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB)is proposing to adopt a General Order(GO)for General Waste Discharge Requirements for the Discharge of Biosolids to Land for Use in Agricultural,Silvicultural,Horticultural,and Land Reclamation Activities in California. (The entire teat of the proposed GO is included in Appendix A.) Biosolids are defined as sewage sludge that has been treated,tested,and shown to be capable of being used beneficially as a soil amendment for agriculture, silviculture,horticulture,and land reclamation. The GO would establish a notification and permit review process applicable to all persons and public entities intending to apply biosolids to land for the purposes stated above. The GO defines discharge prohibitions, discharge and application specifications,transportation and storage requirements, and general procedures and provisions to which all land appliers would be required to adhere. Purpose of the Statewide Program EIR The purpose of this statewide program environmental impact report(EIR)is to comply with a Superior Court order by evaluating the environmental impacts of the SWRCB's adoption and implementation of a GO that would allow the issuance of general WDRs for land application of biosolids. The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requires that state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before taking action on those projects (Pub. Res. Code 21000 et seq.). The project analyzed in this document is the SWRCB's discretionary action on the GO;the underlying activity associated with this action is the land application of biosolids. CEQA also requires that each public agency mitigate or avoid,wherever feasible,the significant environmental effects of projects it approves or implements. An EIR is an informational document used in state, regional,and local planning and decision-making processes to meet the requirements of CEQA. A program EIR is an EIR that is prepared for a series of actions that can be characterized as one large program,in this case the issuance of statewide regulations governing conduct of a continuing program (14 CCR 15168). CaIJ'a SW'wae R...C.n 8o J.M.190 r .,W Wane Dillhmg Re9nnmem,Joe Bi-mi&La AP Ha - D.flMa wilt PmV.ElR ES-2 Executive Summary Background on Biosolids Generation, Disposal, and Reuse Treatment of municipal wastewater typically generates two waste streams: a liquid component and a solid or semisolid component. The liquid component,commonly referred to as offluent,usually is discharged to surface waters or percolation ponds or is used as irrigation water on some types of land. The solid or semisolid component,commonly referred to as sewage sludge,is treated to varying degrees and is typically incinerated, stored in drying beds or ponds,disposed of in landfills,or reused as a soil amendment on some types of land. The GO being considered by the SWRCB would apply to sewage sludges treated and tested to meet the definition of biosolids presented above. More than 50%of the biosolids generated in the United States are reused through some form of land application(Goldstein 1998). Land application of biosolids is currently regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)under Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 503,(mown as the Part 503 regulations),which were adopted in 1993. Part 503 regulates the final use of biosolids by controlling the permissible levels of various constituents of concern,including the level of pathogen reduction,the degree of vector attraction reduction, and the concentration of pollutants in the biosolids. The Part 503 regulations apply to the generator of the biosolids,however, not the applies The GO would apply to dischargers of biosolids rather than biosolids generators, The Part 503 regulations establish two pathogen reduction standards for land- applied biosolids: Class A biosolids are treated sufficiently for all pathogens to be essentially eliminated,and Class B biosolids have been treated sufficiently for the level of pathogens to be substantially reduced but not completely removed. No single state agency regulates land application of biosolids in California;biosolids recycling projects may involve oversight by the SWRCB,the nine regional water quality control boards(RWQCBs),the California Integrated Waste Management Board (IWMB), the California Air Resources Board,and the California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA). The California Department of Health Services(DHS)acknowledges biosolids recycling efforts in its Manual of Good Practice for Landspreading Sewage Sludge(California Department of Health Services 1983). The IWMB has classified biosolids as a solid waste and thus exercises jurisdiction over biosolids use and disposal. The IWMB is responsible for regulating biosolids composting practices(14 California Code of Regulations [CCR],Division 7, Chapter 5),which requires recycling agencies to submit a permit application through the IWMB tiered permitting program. The IWMB designates a local agency in each county as the local enforcement agency(LEA),which sets standards and enforces solid waste regulations. Some counties have made land application of biosolids exempt from solid waste regulations,and others specify where and how disposal of biosolids can be conducted. Some counties have banned the land application of biosolids entirely. J.38,1999 Cdlifr aSwe WamReawexer Comml Bomd Gerd Wane Dlxhm ,RegoircmmrJorBioroad,LmtlApplicaHm Drcft&&M&Prog M v Executive Summary ES-3 In an effort to streamline the RWQCB application and permitting process for the use of biosolids,the Central Valley and[ahontan RWQCBs developed separate general waste discharge requirements (WDRs) (also called GOs) for biosolids land application in 1995 and adopted their programs after approving negative declarations under CEQA. Public agencies subsequently petitioned the SWRCB to set aside the RWQCB actions. During the interim before the SWRCB decision,biosolids application projects were permitted for approximately 50,000 acres under the Central Valley GO. The SWRCB remanded the Central Valley RWQCB GO in April 1996 as a result of legal challenges to the negative declaration but allowed for the continued land application of biosolids on sites for which permit coverage had been filed before April 1, 1996. In May 1996,a CEQA-based lawsuit was filed by the Central Delta and South Delta Water Agencies in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento,seeking that the SWRCB's interim permission for biosolids land application be rescinded under the GO unless an EIR is prepared. On Jane 12, 1997,the Superior Court decided that the SWRCB exceeded its authority in allowing the limited number of land application projects to proceed, On September 12, 1997,the Superior Court judge allowed for the continued application of biosolids on the subject sites and ordered the SWRCB to develop this statewide EIR for land application of biosolids within approximately a 3-year timeframe(by October 2000). The lahoman GO was also subsequently remanded by the SWRCB,but no sites were permitted under this GO at that time. Existing and Projected Biosolids Land Application in California The methods available for biosolids management,and particularly land application of biosolids,ate determined primarily by the quality of the generated product. Sewage sludges removed in municipal wastewater treatment plants can be treated to produce biosolids of sufficient quality for use as soil amendments or can be disposed of using the alternatives mentioned below. The three primary methods for reuse and disposal of biosolids are land application, surface disposal in a landfill,and incineration. Quantity of Biosolids Generated in California The California Association of Sanitary Agencies(CASA),a nonprofit organization of municipal utilities,conducted statewide surveys in 1988, 1991,and 1998 to estimate the quantity of biosolids generated and the uses of those biosolids (California Association of Sanitary Agencies 1991, 1999). The 1988 and 1991 CASA survey results are derived from a database of 120 publicly owned treatment works(POTWs)in California. CASA concluded that daily sludge disposal was 1,025 dry tons per day(TPD)in 1988; 1,610 dry TPD in 1991;and 1,842 dry TPD in 1998(not all of the 120 POTWs submitted Califon aSwie WmerResoamee Comm(Road Jura 18,190 Gereml Warw Dirchmge RequlrememrJarBiorolidrLmdAppiiradm Dregi S�mewtde Pro pam Fla ES-4 Executive Summary survey results). More than 70%of this material is generated at 10 POTWs that have wastewater flows in excess of 50 million gallons per day(mgd). The Los Angeles RWQCB region generates the greatest percentage (nearly 50a/o)of sludge among the nine RWQCB areas,followed in order by the Central Valley, San Francisco Bay,and Santa Ana regions. Disposal and Reuse Methods Most of the biosolids being reused in California are generated in the Los Angeles and Orange County areas,as well as in the other large urban centers of the state (San Diego, the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento). Much of this material is transported a considerable distance by truck for land application. The counties supporting the largest amounts of biosolids reuse are Kem, Kings, Merced, San Diego,Riverside,and Solano. Biosolids disposal and reuse methods in California include landfills, land application, composting,onsite storage and incineration. The 1988 CASA survey results estimates that approximately 60%of the biosolids generated in California were disposed of in landfills; the percentage decreased to approximately 45%by 1991. Land application and composting accounted for 18.7%and 21.7%,respectively, of biosolids rouse in 1991,and both uses had increased considerably from what was reported in 1988. The combined onsite storage and incineration of biosolids remained stable from 1988 to 1991 at approximately 14%of the total generated quantities. The 1998 information indicates a huge increase in land application,with nearly 68%of the material reported through the survey going to this reuse option. As a result,the percentage being disposed of in landfills was reduced to 9.1%. Incineration was the selected method of disposal for 5.6%,and 6.9%remained in onsite storage. The GO regulates the use of biosolids for agriculture,horticulture,silviculture,and land reclamation. In general,the most common land application practice for biosolids is spreading and incorporation into agricultural lands. In California,horticultural use typically involves Class A Exceptional Quality biosolids that have been composted with various types of green waste. The use of biosolids for horticulnual activities could include large-scale landscape plantings such as road medians,parks, and golf courses and as a planting or potting medium in large nursery operations. Currently,no large-scale silvicultural uses(commercial tree farming operations)of biosolids are under way in California. Silvicultural uses are common in other parts of the country,however,including the Pacific Northwest. Additionally,land reclamation is not currently a major biosolids reuse option in Califomia. The major use that would fall into this category is incorporation into final cover material at landfills. This use is not considered a disposal method because it is intended to increase the productivity of the cover soils. Other land reclamation uses could include incorporation into suface materials June 28,,1999 Callfo asrwe WWmReswmes Comro Barra Genrrd Wane Dh hinge RegWmmems/orBiwollarLmWAPPBealrm Drys Macwlh Pmxm = Executive Summary ES-5 at mining reclamation sites or soil borrow areas when subsoil material with low growing potential is exposed at the surface. Future Biosolids Activity in California Future biosolids production can be estimated based on population projections and per capita generation rates. Statistics were compiled from the California Department of Finance and CASA for use in this EB2. Based on census information,the population in urban areas in 1990(the date for which census data and CASA survey data most closely coincide)was 29.8 million(California Department of Finance 1998a),and this figure is expected to increase by approximately 42.3%to 42.4 million by 2015 (Califomia Department of Finance 1998b). Based on the 1991 CASA estimate of biosolids generation (1,610 dry TPD)and assuming that the rate of per capita biosolids generation remains similar until 2015,the total estimated production of biosolids is expected to increase to 2,329 dry TPD. If the percentage of biosolids that are land applied remains constant in the next 15 years,the amount of material being land applied would be 1,579 dry TPD in 2015, with an annual total of 576,690 dry tons. General Order Program Objectives The goal of the GO is to provide a clear and consistent regulatory process that is adequately protective of environmental resources,streamlines the permitting process for land application of biosolids,and includes policies and procedures that ensure continued refinement of biosolids disposal practices and protection of the environment. Therefore, the GO is intended to: ♦ comply with Section 13274 of the California Water Code and the judicial order by the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento by adopting statewide general WDRs for the discharge of dewatered,treated,or chemically fixed sewage sludge(biosofids)for beneficial use as a fertilizer and/or soil amendment; ♦ provide a regulatory framework for biosolids application to land that can be used by individual RWQCBs to act on Notices of Intent(NOls)filed by potential dischargers in a manner that avoids or mitigates potentially adverse environmental effects;and ♦ provide a flexible regulatory framework that allows implementation of a biosolids disposal program for land application operations at the regional level and contains requirements that are based on sound science and best professional judgment. Cahf. is Sim,Wmer Rerour,ee Comrd Bond Jme 28,19" Gerrrd Wane DJ,h ge Regdremem,Jorelw,lldr LmidAP W dm Dry(54mM&Progm = ES-6 Executive Summary Description of General Order Overview The proposed GO was developed to provide a single regulatory framework for the land application of biosolids in California and to streamline the permitting process that each RWQCB was forbiosolids application projects. Provisions of the GO are based largely on the federal Pan 503 regulations to ensure that the state regulation incorporates the extensive health risk assessments and scientific review that went along with developing the federal regulation. Baseline criteria that were established under the Pan 503 regulations must be met under the GO and associated general WDRs. This section generally describes the principal permit conditions and procedures of the GO. Applicability For the purposes of the GO,biosolids are defined as only those sewage sludges produced at municipal wastewater treatment plants that meet the requirements of the Pan 503 regulations. Unstabilized sewage sludge,septage,and wastes that do not meet the Part 503 regulations or are determined to be hazardous under Title 22,Division 4.5, Chapter 11,Article 3 of the CCR would not be regulated under the GO. Under the GO,the discharger is primarily defined as the landowner but may also include an individual,business,or organization involved in the generation,transportation,and application of biosolids. The discharger would be legally responsible for implementing and complying with the provisions of the general WDRs issued by the RWQCB in accordance with the GO. A biosolids application project that is permitted under a single NOI must involve less than 2,000 acres of land that receive biosolids,and all application sites must be within 20 miles of each other. In addition,each landowner involved with a biosolids application project must file a separate NOI and pay a separate filing fee. A permitted project for which the GO is applicable may involve a single application of biosolids or repeated applications. The identification of permitted activities under the GO does not preempt or supersede the authority of local agencies to prohibit,restrict,or control bicsolids reuse. The discharger is responsible for making inquiries about permitted uses and obtaining applicable local permits and authorizations. J.28,19" Carofo a&ms wmw CmmWBoard C.m Wan Dirchar RegWre Mfm Bk Wid Lm APpl.1. Dra tSIdmih PwSr ERf Euecutive Stamm" ES-7 An important component of the GO is the requirement that each biosolids application project operator,before applying any biosolids,must prepare and submit an NOI for the area in which the biosolids are to be applied. The appropriate RWQCB would than review information contained in the NOI and,if it finds the information to be adequate,issues a Notice of Applicability under the general WDRs of the GO along with discharge monitoring requirements. A complete NOI includes a preapplication report that provides the RWQCB with specific information relating to each field or distinct application area. An annual filing fee is required for each year that the project is operating and is based on the threat to water quality and complexity of the project as identified in 23 CCR 2200. Biosolids projects encompassing an area of 40-2,000 acres would be designated a Category B threat to water quality and given a Category`b"complexity raring. Biosolids projects of less than 40 acres would be classified a Category BI threat to water quality and given a Category`b"complexity rating. Relationship of the GO to Part 503 Regulations Some of the minimum standards established under the Part 503 regulations are applicable to the proposed GO program: ♦ Biosolids must be treated to reduce potential disease-causing pathogens. 4 Class A biosolids have been treated sufficiently that pathogens are essentially eliminated;Class A hiosolids must be monitored for bacteria growth at the time of use. ♦ Class B biosolids have been treated sufficiently that pathogens are mbstmtially reduced,but not completely eliminated. Land application of biosolids that meets Class B criteria is restricted by the following conditions: — food crops with harvested parts that touch the soil cannot be harvested for 14 months after biosolids application; — food crops with harvested parts below the soil cannot be harvested for 20 months after application if biosolids remain on the land surface for 4 months or longer before being incorporated into the soil; — food crops with harvested parts below the soil cannot be harvested for 38 months after application if biosolids remain on the land surface for less than 4 months before being incorporated into the soil; CatiJorda&me WmeeReaomcee Comm Bond Ime)8.1999 Ge.e WaneD,.hro8e Rega/rememaJosBioroadaLandAppllcanoa D,111&a,wW,Program EBt ES-8 Executive Summary — food and fiber crops cannot be harvested for 30 days after biosolids application; — animals cannot be grazed on the site within 30 days of biosolids application; — turf cannot be harvested for 12 months after biosolids application if the site is likely to have extensive public exposure (e.g.,golf courses,parks); — public access to land that is likely to have extensive public exposure is not allowed for 12 months affix biowtids application; — grazing of milking animals used for producing unpasteurized milk for human consumption is prevented for at least 12 months if the field is used as pasture; and — public access to land that is unlikely to have extensive public exposure is not allowed for 30 days after biosolids application. The Part 503 regulations also outline several alternative chemical and physical treatment processes and management practices that the biosolids must undergo to reduce vector attraction. Biosolids must be treated to meet at least Class B criteria for pathogen reduction and vector reduction levels before they can be applied to land. The material quality of biosolids that are to be applied to land under the GO must comply with minimum standards for concemons of 10 metals,nine of which are regulated under the Part 503 regulations(see the discussion below in "Discharge Prohibitions of the GO"and"Discharge Specifications of the GO'). Restrictions on pollutant addition levels are described in"Discharge Specifications in the GO". Discharge Prohibitions of the GO The GO contains prohibitions that apply to all land application projects that request authorization. In general,biosolids must not be applied under the following conditions: i the biosolids to be discharged cannot contain any chemical at a concentration in excess of the federal or state regulatory limits for classification as a hazardous waste; 4 the biosolids carmot be discharged except as allowed at authorized storage, processing,and land application sites; Jane 18,1999 Cahfm a&we WavReaomeer Cared Bored Genmd Wane Di dwr RgW..wfo BioaoBdeLmdAPPBmdmn Dnft Stm ideProgram FJR Executive Summary ES-9 i no application is permitted until the RWQCB has issued a Notice of Applicability, a set of individual WDRs, or a waiver of WDRs; ♦ no application is permitted if the discharge would cause or threaten to cause pollution or create a nuisance as defined by Section 13050 of the California Water Code; f no application is permitted that would cause a violation of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act(Health and Safety Code Section 25249.5); 4 no application is permitted to areas not specified in the applicant's NOI; 4 no application is permitted to surface waters or drainage comes; f no application is permitted when the application rate would exceed the nitrogen requirements of the vegetation or the rates that would degrade groundwater unless specifically authorized(appilcaton in excess of nitrogen requirements may be allowed for land reclamation sites if a certified agronomist,registered agricultural engineer,or registered civil engineer demonstrates that application would not degrade the quality of underlying groundwater); i no surface water runoff resulting from irrigation of the site is permitted within 30 days of application unless a sufficient buffer of grass(more than 33 feet)is present to prevent biosolids fiom being carried in runoff from the application site; 4 no application is permitted to frozen or water-saturated ground or during periods of ram heavy enough to cause nmoff from the site; ♦ no application or incorporation into the soil is permitted when wind may reasonably be expected to cause airborne particulates to drift from the site; ♦ no application is permitted in areas subject to erosion or washout offsite; and ♦ discharge of biosolids with pollutant concentrations greater than specified levels is prohibited. Cali/orr.&WV Wmer Beraocer Comrd Bond J.M,,J999 Geend Wax D4ohmgs RegairemrmeforBiorolidilarddpp6aabm Dr l&l d,P.V.M ES-10 Executive Summary Discharge Specifications of the GO The GO contains specifications for the quantity and quality of biosolids that are allowed to be land applied. Most of these specifications are similar to the requirements of the Part 503 regulations and include the following: i Biosolids must be treated to meet Part 503 standards for vector reduction and be treated to either the Class A or Class B level of pathogen reduction standards. ♦ Cumulative lifetime metals loading limits for a given application site shall not exceed specified levels (including background soil levels and levels in applied biosolids). 4 Biosolids application rates shall not exceed the agronomic rate for nitrogen for the crop being planted except as allowed for reclamation sites or biosolids research projects. 4 Following incorporation of biosolids into the soil,tilling practices must minimize erosion of the site resulting from wind,stormwater, and irrigation water. ♦ If the slope of the application site is greater than 10%,an erosion control plan must be prepared by a qualified erosion control specialist. 4 For Class B biosolids,the harvesting period for crops is restricted as described in the Part 503 regulations. In addition,the location of application is specified with respect to property lines,municipal and agricultural supply wells,public roads, surface waters, agricultural buildings,and residential buildings. Storage and Transportation The GO specifies conditions for the storage and transportation of biosolids. Major conditions of the GO include the requirement for biosolids to be transported in covered, leakproof vehicles;drivers must carry a copy of an approved spill response plan and be trained with regard to the proper response to accidents or spill events. The GO defines storage as placement of biosolids on the ground or in nonrnobile containers for more than 7 consecutive days at an intermediate site other than the place of generation and/or processing. If biosolids are to be stored at the application site,the operator must prepare and implement an RWQCB-approved storage program. Biosolids must not be stored for longer than 7 consecutive days;storage areas must be covered between October 1 and April 30 during periods of runoff-producing precipitation;public access to storage areas June 28,19" Cdffo Smre WmerRno .Comrd Bo Generd Warre Dlxhr eReWimmeme/orBtomaa,Lm Appllcalron DrysrdewhkprogramBBr Executive Summary ES-11 must be restricted; and control measures should be implemented to prevent Icachate into the soil, surface mnoff, and washout from floods. Provisions The GO contains 20 general conditions and procedures that must be followed by the discharger. The general provisions are summarized under the following categories of responsibilities: ♦ Obtaining,maintaining,and terminating coverage under the GO: An NOI must be submitted for each biosolids source and discharge site. Specific agencies, adjacent residents,and adjacent landowners identified in the GO and any local agency with jurisdiction over the application site must be notified. The RWQCB must be notified in advance of any transfer of the project to another party. The RWQCB must be notified of project completion through submittal of a Notice of Termination and a Final Discharge and Monitoring Program report. Provisions of the general WDRs issued by the RWQCB are severable. f Chain of responsibility: Individual property owners and companies responsible for biosolids discharges and site operations are primarily accountable for compliance and enforcement actions under the GO. The discharger is responsible for informing all biosolids haulers using the land application site of the conditions contained in the GO. Individual property owners are responsible for applicable crop selection, Property access, and harvesting restrictions under the GO. 4 Monitoring,reporting,and record keeping: The preapplication form that is attached to the GO describes the general reporting requirements and specific groundwater monitoring requirements(if deemed necessary). Groundwater monitoring would generally be required if the depth to groundwater at the disposal site is less than 25 feet and biosolids would be applied to the site more than twice in a 5-year period. If required, one upgradient and two downgradient wells must be monitored annually at each application site to evaluate water level,pH,total dissolved solids,sodium, chloride,nitrate,and total nitrogen levels. The discharger is responsible for implementing the requirements of the GO and for site operations and conducting the required monitoring programs. Sampling must be conducted using approved methods,accurate and properly calibrated equipment, and certified laboratories. Information that must be recorded includes the quantity Caksf a&t Wdm Ramareee Comm&Ba d lane 1$1999 Gererd Wa Dimhmge Requirementsforsiomlid%Lm Appllcafim Dr*bYm i&ProgramEBt ES-12 Executive Summary of biosolids applied at each site along with its nitrogen content,crops grown,and total pollutant loading. The discharger must notify the RWQCB of any noncompliance with the GO within 24 hours. The discharger must keep monitoring records for at least 3 years. Annual monitoring reports submitted to the RWQCB must be signed and certified by the discharger or a duly authorized representative. General Order Exclusion Areas The proposed GO specifies several areas of the state within which biosolids application projects under the GO cannot be permitted. Generally,the exclusion areas are unique or valuable public resources,jurisdictional waters or preserves,or state-designated management areas. The general areas excluded from this GO are the following: i the Lake Tahoe Basin; 4 the Santa Monica Mountains Zone; 4 the California Coastal Zone; f the area within 0.25 mile of a wild and scenic river; ♦ the jurisdictional Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta; i Suisun Marsh; ♦ the area under the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission;and i several specific areas within the jurisdiction of the Lahontan RWQCB,including the Antelope Hydrologic Unit above 3,500 feet, areas in the Mojave River Planning Area,the Hilton Creek/Crowley Lake areas,and areas of the Mono-Owens Planning Area. These areas are not included in the analysis of this EIR. Alternatives to the Proposed Project J.'28•19" CYIl/alld-&XI=Rnmoaea Cawid Bawd C.nr,W Wm Dlrchm RrgWnm .fbrBlo 1&Lm.IANI,i a. D.ft&d *P.V.BBt Executive Summary ES-13 In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6,an EIR must describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project,or to the location of the project,that would feasibly attain most of the basic pmject objectives of the proposed project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project,and must evaluate the comparative merits of these alternatives. An EIR does not need to consider every conceivable alternative to a project; rather,it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision malting and public participation. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(d)allows for alternatives to be analyzed in lesser detail than the proposed project The alternatives to the proposed project were developed to comply with CEQA and are based on input received during the public scoping period. The No-Project Alternative was developed to comply with CEQA- The Modified General Order Alternative is included because it would achieve the project's objectives and would result in reduced impacts compared with the proposed project Although the land Application Ban Alternative would not meet the project's basic objectives,it was included in the alternatives analysis to respond to issues identified during the public seeping period. Impacts of the Proposed General Order Table ES-1 (at the end of this chapter)presents a summary of project impacts and mitigation measures under the proposed project. Details of the mitigation measures can be found in each relevant technical chapter. Additionally,a mitigation monitoring program is included in Chapter 15,`Mitigation Monitoring Program'. Environmentally Superior Alternative CEQA requires that the lead agency identify the environmentally superior alternative among those evaluated in the EIR that are within the reasonable range of alternatives. The Modified General Order Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative because it reduces the potential for significant environmental effects when compared to the proposed GO and it is within the reasonable range of alternatives. The Modified GO would include various additional discharge requirements that take into account some of the unusual conditions that exist in regions of California that might receive land-applied biosolids. It also contains the requirements for some additional data and technical analysis to be available to the RWQCB staff when evaluating individual land application permits. Under the Modified General Order Alternative,potential impacts related to water quality, land productivity(including trace elements and heavy metals in sails),soil emsion, crop Catifw S.,Wser Rer.,r Cmard Basil J.ra.im C. W".Dlrahmge Requirememr/or BloulidrLmdAPPBcotlm Dryfi Sa Id,Pn M ES-14 Esecutive Summary contamination,public health risk,land use compatibility,reduced visual quality,potential loss of special-status plant and wildlife species or biologically unique or sensitive natural communities, air quality emissions exmiling significance thresholds for air districts, exposure of sensitive receptors to noise,and disturbance of significant cultural resources would not occur because measures have been incorporated into the design of this alternative to avoid these impacts. Other CEQA-Required Impact Conclusions Cumulative Impacts State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires that an EIR discuss cumulative impacts of a proposed project when the incremental effects of an individual project would be considerable viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of current projects,and the effects of probable future projects. Additionally,the State CEQA Guidelines state that when a lead agency is examining a project with an incremental effect that is not cumulatively considerable,a lead agency need not consider the effect significant but shall briefly describe its basis for reaching that conclusion. Land application of biosolids could contribute to less-than-significant cumulative impacts for biological resources,air quality,and transportation and a significant cumulative impact for groundwater. Cumulative impacts on these resources are discussed in Chapter 13. Growth-Inducing Impacts State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(d)requires an EIR to include a discussion of the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth,or the construction of additional housing,either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment The land application of biosolids would not be growth inducing because it would not foster economic or population growth or remove any obstacles to growth in California. Land application of biosolids is an existing activity in California and would not induce growth as a result of adopting the proposed GO. J. 19" Ca) -Slone Wxw Berm .Cm Bared Ge-,d W"x Duhmge Beq�,JorBmhdlL AppH.Wj. D.*SidM*Pm EtB Executive Summary ES-15 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts CEQA requires that an EEL identify my significant and unavoidable impacts of the proposed project Implementation of the GO would not result in my significant and unavoidable impacts. Irreversible Commitment of Resources and Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126 requires that an EEL include a discussion of my irreversible commitment of resources that would occur as a result of project implementation. Irreversible commitment of resources would occur as a result of implementing the proposed project. nose msomces include fossil fuels,labor,and energy required for transporting and spreading biosolids. CEQA also requires that an EEL identify my significant irreversible environmental changes that could result from the project. Although there is the potential for accidental spills of biosolids to occur during transportation of the biosolids to the application site,the GO requires that biosolids be transported in covered,leakproof vehicles;therefore, accidental spills of biosolids resulting from transporting biosolids to a site are unlikely because of the measures incorporated into the GO. If spills did occur,it would be unlikely that an irreversible environmental change would occur. Additionally,land application of biosolids would generally occur on lands that are currently in agricultural production. It is unlikely that significant amounts of land would be converted from nonagricultural to agricultural land use (or to silvicultural,horticultural,or land reclamation use)as a result of this project. Known Areas of Controversy State CEQA Guidelines Section 15123(b)requires that an EEL identify areas of controversy known to the lead agency,including issues raised by other agencies and the public. The following are known areas of controversy for regulating the land application of biosolids expressed during the scoping and preparation of this EIR Validity of Scientific Data Used during the Formulation of Part 503 Regulations. Numerous comments were received during the scoping process for the draft EEL regarding the validity of the scientific data used by EPA when formulating the Part California Stone Wmer Ra.o .Control Bound June 28.1999 Gemr Waste Disahorge Re9wmmemrfoeBiosolidsL=dAP 1'cahm Drcft Stan ,&ProgramEIR ES-16 Executive Summary 503 regulations. These concems,including those expressed in the Cornell Waste Management htstitute's 1999 working paper(Cornell Waste Management Institute 1999) have been reviewed and taken into consideration in preparing the impact analyses in this EIR The proposed GO includes land application controls that are more stringent than those included in the Part 503 regulations to account for uausual conditions that may exist in California and differences of opinion that may exist about the adequacy of the Part 503 regulations. Reduced Property Values where Land Application Occurs. Issues were raised during the scoping process for the draft EIR regarding the potential for reduced property values on and adjacent to sites where land application occurs. Potential property value effects have not been addressed in this EIR,as they would be an economic rather than an environmental effect. Property value effects are considered speculative at this time. Loss of Crop Value as a Result of Public Perception. Another known area of controversy raised during the scoping process for the draft EIR was the potential for a decrease m crop value resulting from the public perception of biosolids being applied to the soil where these crops were grown. Additionally,concom was raised that crop value would be reduced for land adjacent to parcels where biosolids land application has occurred because the public or food processors could believe that the crops were grown on soil containing biosolids or were contaminated by the adjacent site when biosolids have been used. This issue has been addressed in Chapter 4, "Land Productivity"with regard to the productive value of the land. The potential economic effects are not discussed because they are considered speculative and would not result in a physical change in the environment Increase in Operation Costs. Concerns were raised about the GO's effect on operating costs at POTWs. If POTW costs me increased to meet additional treatment and reuse restrictions,the cost to the general public for wastewater treatment might also increase. Although the cost of biosolids treatment and management might increase to meet all of the terns of the GO,the economic effects have not been predicted in this EIR because they are not considered environmental impacts. Availability of RWQCB Resources to Adequately Monitor and Enforce the 60. Several comments received during the scoping process for the draft EIR related to the availability of the RWQCBs to adequately monitor and enforce the GO. The RWQCBs are the state enforcement agency charged with regulating the land application of biosolids. Members of the public and agency staff indicated that both funds and staffing resources would be needed for the RWQCBs to adequately administer this additional regulatory program. Much of the public concern regarding the viability of the GO has related to its reliance on strung monitoring and enforcement actions. J�mr 18.Im CWf.' Slwe Wmn Re.,,C..I.I Bo Grand Wa Dl hmxe Rrquire.If.rBl.r fidrLmtlApp4cdlon Drft&M lhPo EIR Executive Summary ES-17 Significance of Certain Nigh-Profile,Widely Publicized Human Diseases. Several comments also were received regarding certain high-profile,widely publicized human diseases,such as AIDS,hepatitis, "mad cow"disease,hormone inhibitors,and Legionnaire's disease. Chapter 5, "Public Health",discusses the potential for these diseases to occur as a result of implementing the proposed GO. Because there is not a large body of research regarding the ability of these diseases to be transmitted specifically in biosolids,the public health risks are considered speculative and the potential for these risks will continue to be studied. General Public Acceptance of Reusing Human Waste. Another known area of controversy is the public acceptability of reusing human waste. Although human waste has been used as a resource by various cultures worldwide for thousands of years,the potential public health risk and the tendency to remove this material from today's modem society will continue to make land application a controversial action. The agencies and associations interested in maintaining the resource value of biosolids are attempting to change public perception through education and additional research. Required Permits and Approvals State CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 states that an EIR must include a list of the agencies that expect to use the EIR in their decision making and a list of the approvals required to implement the project. In order for the proposed GO to be implemented,the SWRCB would adopt the GO and certify the Ea With the exception of the RWQCBs, no other agencies would use the EIR for decision making purposes. No other permits or approvals would be required. Cal aStme W&nReammva Cum Bawd J.A 1999 Gemral Wane Diachmge RequIrememrforBio+alidrLmdAPplieaHcn DroJt Sane wlh Program EIR �ww8wdaplwamrS rfrrp -MAf uogoalf�YPm7rPlforol Mmwl^bayaBmyxlQauoM lwauaJ pwgNum°J rawmusaomM amrs opu^J.4°J 666I'BZ a°^! [W WnS 2ARn"X3 91-S3 Table ES-I. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the California State Water Resources Control Board General Waste Discharge Requirement for Biosolids Land Application Level of Level of Significance Significant before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Soils, Hydrology,and Water Quality Changes to etdsting drainage patterns or Less than None required Less than increase in surface runoff significant significant Changes in groundwater supply and Less flan None required Less than hydrology significant significant Potential degradation of surface water from Less than None required Less than nutrients in biosolids significant significant Potential degradation of groundwater from Less than None required Less than nutrients significant significant Potential degradation of surface water and Less than None required Less than groundwater from trace elements in biosolids significant significant Potential degradation of surface water and Less than None required Less than groundwater from synthetic organic significant significant compounds in biosolids ----------_-_----------__________-_ _____________________ Land Productivity Changes in physical soil properties and Less than None required Less than resulting effects on productivity significant significant Changes in soil fertility and salinity and Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than resulting effects on productivity significant with the pre-application report significant Level of Level of Significance Significant before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Changes in trace elements and heavy metal Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than plain toxicity in soils and resulting effects on significant with the pre-application report significant productivity Changes in amount of synthetic organic Less than None required Less than compounds in soils and resulting effects on significant significant agricultural productivity Changes in grazing-land productivity Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than significant with the pre-application report significant 4-2: Extend grazing restriction period to allow for SOC biodegradation Increases in sod erosion rates and resulting Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than effects on production significant with the pre-application report significant Changes in famdand classification Less than None required Less than significant significant Effect on agricultural lands caused by public Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than concerns about cmp contamination from significant with the pre-application report significant biosolids applications 4-2: Extend giving restriction period to allow for SOC biodegradation 4-3:Tick and identify biosolids application sites Changes in soil nutrient properties and Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than resulting effects on productivity for significant with the pre-application report significant silvicultuml activities Potential soil degradation at recreation-area Less than None required Less than apploication sites significant significant Level of Level of Significance Significant: before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Potential soil degradation Potentially 4-1:Provide soil-and site-screening information Less than significant with the pre-application report significant 4-2: Extend grazing restriction period to allow for SOC biodegradation .__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Public Health Potential for increased incidence of disease Lms than 5-1:Review manual of good practices Less than resulting from direct contact with pathogenic significant (recommended) significant organisms at biosohds land application sites Potential for increased incidence of disease Less than None required Less than resulting from direct human contact with significant significant pathogenic organisms in irrigation mmoff from biosohds land application sites Potential for increased incidence of disease Potentially 5-2: Extended grazing restriction period to allow Less than resulting from ingestion of pathogenic significant for pathogen reduction significant organisms in crops grown on land application sites or animals fed with crops grown on land application sites Potential for inceased incidence of chronic Less than None required Less than human disease resulting from ingestion of significant significant biosolids-derived metals in crops grown on land application sites or animals fed with crops grown on land application sites Potential for increased risk of chronic disease Less than None required Less than resulting from ingestion of biosohds-der ved significant significant organic compounds in food,soils,animals, dairy products,or wildlife Potential for increased incidence of disease Less than None required Less than resulting from ingestion of groundwater significant significant contaminated by biosolidsderived pollutants orpathogens Level of Level of Significance Significant before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Potential for increased incidence of acute or Less than None required Less than chronic disease resulting from human significant significant exposure to aerosols and wind-blown particulates from biosolids stockpiling, composting,or land application Potential for increased risk of disease Less than None required Less than resulting from contact with biosolids spilled significant significant during transport from point of generation to application site ____________________________________________ Land Use and Aesthetics Application of biosolids in a manner and/or in Less than None required Less than locations in conflict with local land use plans significant significant and ordinances,including future planned land uses Application of Class B biosolds at locations Potentially 6-1: Require setbacks form areas defined as Less than that may conflict with existing land uses in significant having a high potential for public exposure significant urban areas;recreation areas;or other sensitive areas,including schools,hospitals, and recreation/public assembly areas Reduced visual quality resulting from truck Significant 10-2: Control fugitive dust form unpaved roads Less than transport of biosolids through residential significant and/or recreational areas 11-1:Avoid the use of haul route new residential lands Reduced visual quality resulting from land Potentially 10-2:Control fugitive dust from unpaved roads Less than application activities adjacent to schools, significant significant hospitals,or recreationtpublic assembly areas Reduced visual quality resulting form spillage Significant 6-2:Require the maintenance of biosolids Less than of biosolids on public roads transport trucks after biosolids are loaded in the significant tacks .__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Biological Resources Level of Level of Significance Significanc before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Reduction in the number of a special-status Significant 7-1:Modify pre-application report and provide Less than plant or wildlife species biological information significant Substantial disturbance of biologically unique Significant 7-2:Modify pre-application report and provide Less than or sensitive natural communities information on biologically unique or sensitive significant natural communities Potential for physiological effects of biosolids less than None requited Less than application on wildlife significant significant _____—________________________________________________________________________________ Fish Potential for acute toxicity to fish from Potentially 8-1:Increase setback from enclosed water bodies if Less than leaching of biosolids constituents from significant pupfish are present significant application sites to surface waters Potential for reduced fisheries productivity Potentially 4-1:Provide sail-and site-screening information Less than resulting from runoff and emsion significant with the pre-application report significant Traffic Potential increase in traffic resulting from the Less than None required Less than transport of biosolids significant significant Deterioration of roadway surfaces Less than None required Less than significant significant Potential for roadway safety hazards resulting Less than None required Less than from accidental spills significant significant Air Quality Generation of NOx and PM10 from biosolid Potentially 10-1:Property maintain vehicles in good operating Less than transport vehicles and biosolids spreaders for significant condition and limit truck travel on paved roads to significant vehicle travel exceeding 4,800 VMT per day 4,800 VMT and/or 67 VMT per day on unpaved roads 10-2:Control fugitive dust from unpaved roads Level of Level of Significance Significant before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Exposure of sensitive receptors to odors Less than None required Less than significant significant Biosolids drift associated with windblown Less than None required Less than biosolids significant significant ______ _______________________________ ______________________________________________ Noise Exposure of noise-sensitive land uses to noise Significant 11-1: Avoid the use of haul routs near residential Less tban resulting from the transport of biosolids land uses significant Exposure of wise-sensitive land uses to noise Less than Now required Less than from the land application of biosolids significant significant Cultural Resources Damage to or destruction of cultural resources Significant 12-1: Conduct a cultural resources investigation Less than on lands net previously disturbed by significant agricultural activities Damage to or destruction of unknown cultural Significant 12-2: Comply with slate laws regarding Less than resources on lands currently in agricultural disposition of Native American burials,if such significant production remains are found ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cumulative Impacts Curnulauve nitrate contamination of potentially 13-1:Minimize contribution to groundwater Less than groundwater significant nitrate contamination from hand application of significant biosolids conducted under the GO 13-2:Reduce Sources of Nitrate Contamination Cumulative loss of special-status plant and Less than None required Less than wildlife species or the loss or disturbance of significant significant biologically unique or sensitive natural communities Level of Level of Significance Significant before a after Impact Mitigation Mitigation Measure Mitigation Cumulative increase in NO,and PM IO Less than None required Less than emissions significant significant Cunndative deterioration of madways Less flan None required Less than significant significant CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES 0 925 L Street,Suite 1400 Sacramento,CA 95814 TEL:(916)446-0388-FAX:(916)448-4809 July 2, 1999 TO: CASA Member Agencies (Please share with your Board Members) CASA Attorneys FROM: Mike Dillon Bobbi Larson RE: Legislative Update I. Budget and "Trailer Bills" - For the first time since 1986,the State Budget will be enacted into law by the July 1",constitutional deadline. The Senate met the Legislature's deadline of June 15'",passing the Budget on a strong bi-partisan vote of 36 "ayes"to 3 "noes,"thus putting pressure on the Assembly to act favorable. The following day the Assembly passed the Budget on a vote of 69"ayes" to 10"noes." Accompanying the Budget are two dozen"trailer bills"that contain language to implement the various programs contained in the Budget. AB 1661-Todakson,for example,provides$150 million in one-time local government relief,being provided to cities,counties,and special districts. $75 million will be distributed gn a per capita basis(primarily to cities)and$75 million which will be distributed to local governments in proportion to their ERAF property tax shifts. Less than$7 million is estimated to be available to special districts state-wide,thus any return to CASA members will be quite minimal. While the newspapers have reported amounts ranging from$700-$800 million in "local government relief,"the largest amount($425 million)has been set aside for an"infrastructure bank"to make loans available for a multitude of local government projects. Other major expenditures include$100 million for the COPS Program, and$50 million to "back fill" cities for the cost of booking fees,and$150 million to pay the school's share of property tax administration costs to counties. This latter provision,as well as$234 million to cap or"freeze" ERAF next year,are also included in the budget,but they are contingent upon voter approval of a constitutional amendment that would be developed by the Legislature and placed on the November,2000 ballot. The purpose of the constitutional amendment is to restructure local government financing. H. Bill To Increase Directors' Compensation At the May meeting in Sacramento,there was a strong showing of support at the General Session for a proposal brought by Orange County Sanitation Districts,to increase compensation for directors of county sanitation districts and sanitary districts. Since the deadline for introduction of legislation in this Session had already been passed,the only means of accomplishing this task was to find an appropriate bill,and a willing author,to in our proposed amendments to the sanitary and sanitation district acts. It is also necessary,if the bill has a particular sponsor,to obtain permission of the sponsor. Recently, Senator Dave Kelley,and the sponsors of his SB 631,the San Diego County Water Authority,graciously allowed us to include our amendments in the Senator's measure. SB 631 will allow Sanitary and Sanitation districts,by ordinance,to increase directors' compensation in an amount not to exceed five percent(5"/u)per year since the last adjustment(1986). It also increases the current 6 days per month to no more than ten days per month. These provisions parallel those of most water districts. SB 631 recently passed the Assembly Water,Parks,and Wildlife Committee. Because of our amendments it has also been"double referred" to the Assembly Local Government Committee. If we are successful in the Assembly,the bill will then be returned to the Senate for concurrence of our assembly amendments. III. Contract Retention 10 % to 5% In the last two Legislative Sessions,bills were introduced which would limit the amount of funds that a public entity may hold in"retention"on public works projects to 5%of the contract price. The bills were supported by the major unions and contractor associations. Despite the strong opposition of CASA,ACWA,the League of Cities,CSAC,and various local government entities,the measures were sent to the Governor with bi-partisan support. The bills,which also included State Government and the Universities,were subsequently vetoed by Governor Wilson. His veto message stated "As a public manager,I believe it is reasonable to ask public agencies to manage public works projects according to the same standards,criteria and level of professionalism as is practiced in the private sector. It would be irresponsible of me,however,to tie the hands of public agencies with statutory restrictions and expect a similar performance standard." This year,AB 806-Keeley,a measure similar to those of prior years,is moving through the Legislature with resounding bi-partisan support and will shortly be on the Governor's desk. Governor Davis,unlike Governor Wilson, received a lot of support in his election from the unions supporting AB 806. Speculation is that he will likely sign the bill. IV. Commissions.Commissions,and More Commissions... The Assembly Speaker's Local Government Commission and the Commission on Local Governance for the 210 Century have been tackling the issues of local government structure,finance,and service delivery for several months. CASA is scheduled to appear before the Commission on Local Governance(also known as the "Hertzberg Commission")on July 23 in Fresno. Meanwhile,the Speaker's Commission recently invited Senator Steve Peace to appear before them to highlight the local government provisions contained in this year's State Budget. Senator Peace reviewed the"SCA Proposal"contained in this year's Local Government trailer bill,which would direct the legislature to draft a senate constitutional amendment(SCA)to cap the growth on the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund(ERAF)and address the fiscalizaton of land use by considering major overhauls in the stateviocal tax structure,and local government responsibility and service delivery. If approved by 2/3rds of the Legislature,the SCA would be placed on the November 2000 ballot. Said Senator Peace, "We embraced an SCA concept only because we needed a 2/3rds vote on it to gain the support of the legislature. The Governor is nervous about an SCA because it doesn't require his signature. But I have spent the last several days convincing the Governor's staff that we won't put any work product forward that he isn't supportive of." If the Governor signs the trailer bill, it is rumored that hearings would begin during the summer on formulating this legislation. Peace added, "I think with the influx of new local government related officials in the legislature,the desire is there. This is ready to be engaged." To add to the long list of local government exploration groups,is the Little Hoover Commission,who held a hearing on June 24 to examine the role of special districts. A briefing paper on the hearing stated that the "Commission is interested in assessing the govemance,accountability and efficiency of the nearly 3,000 independent special districts in California. Since most of the controversies surrounding special districts involve independent districts-those that are governed by independently elected boards-those will be the focus of the Commission's review." The Commission heard testimony from those ranging from Fred Silva(foormer Constitution Revision Commission Executive Director),Dr. Stephen Morgan(USC Professor),and Harry Ehrlich(President,California Special District Association). The Commission has announced that they will "hold another hearing in August where it will look at several special district case studies. The Commission will hear from witnesses involved in controversies surrounding a Southern California water replenishment district, representatives of fire districts engaged in consoli dction talks,and water districts that have successfully consolidated." We will continue to keep you informed as to the progress of these three groups...and others. V. Waste Discha=Fees SB 390-Alpert,as introduced,contained a number provisions, including changes to current law relating to civil liability for intentionally or negligently violating discharge orders. In the Senate Appropriations Committee, amendments were placed in the bill which eliminated the current$10,000 per discharger cap on NPDES permit fees. Instead,the SWRCB would be allowed to charge the "actual cost"of issuing the permit. As reported in the last legislative update,this action caused CASA to strongly oppose the measure. After a series of meetings with Senator Alpert,key legislative staff,and others,we have been successful in getting the current$10,000 cap restored. In the meantime,discussions will probably continue this Fall regarding a needs analysis and any potential changes to the fee structure. VI. Michael Abramson Assumes New Position The board of directors of the West Contra Costa Wastewater District announced the resignation of District Manager Michael Abramson, effective June 15, 1999. He is leaving the district and going to the city of Fresno, where he will assume the position of Assistant Director of Public Utilities for Water and Wastewater. Michael has served on our CASA Legislative Committee the past several years,and has been one of our most active contributors on legislative issues. In a recent conversation with Michael,he said he will miss his participation in CASA,but hopes to "stay in touch." We wish him the very best in his new position. enaamo.624 Y2K grounds LOT flights -Jul. 18, 1999 rage -i oT z Captainslog. 0 k stock quote search In M r Home News Markets 8, InVeslbngV Services VSiteindex News deals world business: Europe companies Y2K grounds LOT flights technology , world business Polish airline cancels all Jan. 1 flights to europe avoid 'possibility of complications' lookahead ' •.rr r asia July 13,1999:e:55 a.m.ET emerging markets WARSAW(Reuters)- Poland's national airline stories time zones LOT Monday said it would ground all its planes global quotes on Jan. 1, 2000 to avoid millennium bug y2K r°seeclel a°asn; small business problems, in what is thought to be the first industrywatch mass cancellation in Europe due to Y2K Alrl'rwa su9er Y2K lRlers economy worries. -Mann 3l 1999 business unusual "The management has decided to cancel all sites biz buzz flights on this sensitive day because of the a �oT cal.n nmN.a head of the curve possibility of complications or problems with the special reports airline's infrastructure," company spokeswoman news in brief Monks Krajczynska told Reuters. Krajczynska did not identify specific areas of Markets& Investing concern and said flights on LOT's fleet of personal finance modem Boeing and other jets will resume track your stocks service on Jan. 2. broker center "We want to be mistake-free and that's why us markets we are taking this step," she said. LOT flies to world markets most major eastern and western European bonds & rates capitals, North America, and has a large charter currencies operation that ferries Poles to holiday continued destinations. Services She estimated the state-owned company's broker center losses from the one-day grounding would be bond center minimal because of the small number of power shopper travelers on New Years Day. travel center The year 2000, or Y2K, problem arises from watch CNNfn video the inability of some computers and computer search In video systems to recognize the date 2000, since they Gips were programmed to read only the last two continued digits of a year. Site Index The glitch may cause computers to search malfunction or shut down, a potentially site map disastrous occurrence if it hits air traffic help management systems or equipment on-board how do 17 jet aircraft. continued Many large European and North American airlines and airports have said they were http://cnnfn.com/1999/07/13/europe/Wires/lot_wg/ 7/13/99 itn grounos w r mgncs - uui. io, raaa raga < confident their safety and computer checks made it safe for them to fly to most destinations on New Year's Day. In Asia, national carrier Vietnam Airlines has canceled all its Flights just before the start of the year 2000 to ensure there are no millennium bug complications, while Indonesia's PT Garuda has indicated it might not fly on New Year's Day. Officials from several major Western airlines have said they will be flying when the clock strikes midnight on Dec. 31 to allay public fears about flying through the date rollover.® Copyright 1999 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Copyright 4D1999 CNN Amedca, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. http://cnnfn.com/1999/07/13/europe/wires/lot_wg/ 7/13/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Lv� Name of Paper Section Page # Date —r h C4S{ LII„s�SubCecc tn vv�t�'`'�' L r�2 ev�(A2n� G sFlu `�`l Im fojmc ciL 's se,)er s s Sewers rank No. 1 on committee's survey ■ Infrastructure panel last week's meeting shows. M Undersized and deteriorated members give arks a plenty of work remains to be - - -- - sewer lines carry "substantial" 9r P done before the group makes a 'lliBkaurfirdml.Theresalot consequences, such as ground low priority on their list. �� decision about priodtizing abrs fefinal � to contamination and backed-up .. roughly$1.3 billion in WFastruc- toilets,he said. Eacta Bw-YtHurOA lure needs over the next 20 years. done., Other concerns ranking high b,�,� This is our first cut,' UW Ha�ow on the list include improving Chairman Dick Harlow safd. flood control facilities, residential HUNTINGTON BEACH — 'There's a lot more refinement Chairman of Huntington streets, sidewalks and curbs, the Makin sure our toilets Bush that needs to be done.' Beafh's inftartmcture 9 Y report states. Maintainingnew old properly tops the a co ms of the City consultant Gary Dysart CO1"n'm� parks and constructing low new ones pile's mars report committee, a isn't surprised system improving mesthe ranked relatively low according preliminary report presented at pile's sewer system means so I much to the committee members, to the report. Los Angeles Times Find rage r or Z News IShen x p Wednesday, July 7, 1999 Sewage Lines Suspect in Beach Contamination By H.G. REZA �luntington State Beach, already closed nearly a week, will remain shut until authorities trace the source of a bacterial contamination found in the water. Monica Mazur, environmental specialist at the Orange ADVERTISEMENT County Health Care Agency, said video cameras will be placed today inside sewer lines leading from the public restrooms to determine if sewage is leaking from the pipes. 'We've found elevated bacteria levels but aren't sure about the source. It could possibly be sewage," Mazur said. She said the same problem occurred in 1996 at Boise Chica State Beach, and authorities used video cameras inside the sewer lines to pinpoint the problem. In that case, engineers found 40 cracks and separations in the sewer lines that served the restrooms, she said. The closure, which began July 1, will continue until the source of the contamination is found and eliminated, Mazur said. Beach Still Closed The Orange County Health Care Agency has closed a mile-long stretch of Huntington State Beach because of high bacteria counts. The nearby city beach remains open. Sources: California Department of Parks and Recreation, City of Huntington Beach. Copyrin 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stones about: SEA, OCEAN POLLUTION—ORANGE COUNTY, HUNTINGTON STATE BEACH.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. News oo Site Index pp .../Fndcgi?action=View&VdkVgwKey=%2E%2E%2F%2E%2E%2Fvol7%2FCNS%5FDAYS%2F9907 7/12/99 bomeming In the vvater raye i ui o News __ _ co Site Index pp �l 61LUR HEALTH HELP rs ANN Monday, July 12, 1999 Something in the Water . Viruses, bacteria and disease may lurk invisibly where you swim. It's enough to make you sick. By JANE E. ALLEN, Times Health Writer �'.icture the solitary surfer on the perfect wave. _ Alone? Not really. A host of nasty creatures too small to be seen share that water. ADVERTISEMENT The next time you plan a cooling splash in the ocean, a r r dip at a lake or a swim at an indoor pool with water slides and fountains, remember you could have company that leaves you with a medical memento of your visit. On the other hand, the rate at which occasional Looking beachgoers and other bathers get sick from water they g 1or a inhale or swallow is probably fairly low, although no one new or used has gotten a handle on the precise rate. The risk rises with exposure. Surfers—those inveterate water lovers—are continuously exposed to the microscopic zoo that thrives in the sea. Despite warnings to stay out of the water for 72 hours after a storm, surfers usually lake their chances when waves are churning brown and murky with urban runoff. "If you're on the beach and you see perfect barrels firing offshore, it can be the color of cappuccino and you're going to put on your wetsuit and go," says Steve Hawk of San Clemente, a writer and former editor of Surfer magazine. Ask him about skin problems and other waterborne illnesses and he responds: "I've had them all." Water supports not only native marine creatures, but other invaders that wend their way there, invisibly carried by people or pets who take a plunge. If you could peer into a drop of water where people are at play, you might find tiny round or rod-shaped bacteria that make their usual home in the guts of humans and animals. Or tiny, roundish viruses from human waste. That drop could also contain weakened forms of polio excreted by people who have just been vaccinated. And perhaps tiny plants called phytoplankton in toxic red tides that may http://www.latimes.conVHOME/NEWS/HEALTH/t000062124.htmi 7/12/99 Something in the Water rage z or o trigger reactions in swimmers, fishermen or passersby on piers who inhale sea spray. Health officials post signs and close beaches when tests show that levels of biologic pollutants are unsafe. They monitor total coliform—a group of bacteria that come from soil, plants, animals and humans—as well as fecal coliform, most of which is the common gut-dweller e. coli, along with the ball-shaped enterococci, another intestinal bug that often enters the ocean through storm drains. These three "indicator" bacteria don't often produce illness, but at sufficient concentrations they can indicate the presence of other microorganisms that can make you sick. "Any time you see water flowing across the beach, you shouldn't swim in it or within 50 yards of that area upcoast or downcoast. If you see a storm drain that's flowing, you shouldn't swim next to it," says Charles McGee, microbiology laboratory supervisor for the Orange County Sanitation District. The agency monitors 17 miles of coastline in Orange County from Memorial Day through Labor Day. On July 1, health officials closed a mile of Huntington State Beach because of high bacteria; they have been searching for a suspected sewage source. Lakes and dams are other potential trouble spots for illnesses spread by people who use recreational waters as toilets. Even indoor pools, where you might expect chlorination to annihilate anything dangerous, can pose a threat to lifeguards who sit about 8 feet above the surface. Bacteria killed by the chemicals hover in sprays and can hitch a ride deep into the lungs with every breath, triggering inflammation and scarring. Indoor and outdoor pools pose a more general hazard to swimmers when chlorine isn't sufficient to kill microorganisms. Pathogens Collect Near the Water's Surface So choose your wet playgrounds carefully. Some of the biggest concentrations of bacteria and viruses are 1 to 2 feet below the surface of the water, where some people "slyly and unbeknownst to their swimming partners" are relieving themselves or coughing up material that finds "little tidal recesses where it sort of collects, as flotsam and jetsam will do," says Dr. Mark Renneker of San Francisco, founder of the Surfer's Medical Association. Renneker suspects these bacteria are responsible for more cases of illness than environmental scientists and doctors ever hear about. He hypothesizes that bacteria and viruses are causing "subclinical" infections, which may make someone feel slightly sick, but not bad enough to http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/HEALTH/t000062124.html 7112/99 Something in the Water rage o gt o seek care. Jed Alan Fuhrman, a marine biology professor at USC, looks at the viruses—called enteroviruses—that can cause intestinal and neurological symptoms. They include hepatitis, which causes liver infection; Coxsackie, which can cause an inflammation of the membrane around the brain called meningitis; and rotavirus, which is responsible for severe diarrhea. He tests water at piers and where storm drains empty to see if viral concentrations are sufficient to be detected. Researchers know little about those viruses other than that they can "live longer in water than bacteria and can cause symptoms at lower densities than bacterial densities." Heal the Bay, a not-for-profit coastal advocacy group in Santa Monica, this year began offering a weekly report card to help beachgoers judge which waters might be unhealthy. The report card, posted on the Internet (httm//www.healthebay.org) grades water quality at 250 locations from the Orange-San Diego County line to the Santa Barbara County line near San Luis Obispo. It Pays to Monitor Water Safety Reports Some beach-lovers are aware that a day at the shore might be followed by a day in bed with an upset stomach, and they choose their spots accordingly. Brian LaRuffa, manager of Harbor Surf Shop in Seal Beach, is one such person. He's suffered irritated, burning eyes and an intestinal infection called gastroenteritis after surfing polluted waters off jetties at the mouths of the Santa Ana River at Newport Beach and the San Gabriel River at Seal Beach. After a decade of surfing almost daily, he's become more cautious. LaRuffa favors surfing Huntington Beach or other parts of Newport Beach instead of the waves behind his shop: "I won't go out here,just because of pollution. I can't afford to get sick. It isn't worth it to me." Despite a decade of monitoring and efforts to clean up the water, Mark Gold, Heal the Bay's executive director, laments the fact that"a day at the beach probably poses as much of a health risk as it did 10 years ago." However, he says, the risk of a major sewage spill occurring during dry weather is much lower because of improvements in sewage treatment plants and sewage systems. The worst problems come when swimmers venture close to storm drains, according to a study Gold co- authored that appears in the July issue of the journal Epidemiology. The work, led by USC epidemiologist Robert Haile, is based on a 1995 survey of thousands of hfp:/Avww.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/HEALTH/1000062124.htmi 7/12/99 Something in the Water rage v or q swimmers at three Santa Monica beaches who dunked their heads while swimming. Those who swam near storm drains were twice as likely to suffer gastrointestinal and respiratory problems, fever and sore throats as those who kept at least 400 yards away. The study also found: Bacterial counts were higher at ankle depth than at chest depth, which means children who play in the shallows are at higher risk. High bacterial counts occurring as much as 100 yards from a flowing storm drain, and sometimes even farther. Intestinal viruses existing in almost every storm drain the researchers sampled, even though storm drains are separate from sewage systems. Freshwater and Pools Can Also be Hazardous Jack Petralia, director of environmental protection in the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, also monitors three freshwater swim areas: Castaic Lake in Castaic, Santa Fe Dam in Irwindale and Puddingstone Lake in San Dimas. "We've had more trouble with illness in freshwater bathing [areas] because we get so many people in them. You put 1,000 people in a small body of water with no chlorination, and if somebody is sick in there and has diarrhea, they can get everybody around them sick." During the 1985 Labor Day weekend, 68 people became ill with shigellosis, a form of dysentery, contracted while bathing at Santa Fe Dam, but there hasn't been a similar outbreak since then. For the last few years, L.A. County has pumped chlorine solution underneath the sand at the three freshwater swim areas on weekends. There have been no major reports of illness since the program began. Petralia says public swimming pools generally are safe, except when someone loses bowel control in the water. In that case, county authorities request the pool close for 24 to 48 hours. As a rule, Petralia advises that if pool water is cloudy, "don't go in." Indoor swimming pools with waterfalls, slides, sprays and spouts pose a health hazard that has become known as "lifeguard lung" since it was first identified in 1989. Dr. Cecile Rose, an associate professor of medicine at National Jewish Medical and Research Center in Denver, coined the phrase after finding inflamed nodules in the lungs of career lifeguards at a municipal pool. The first patient was a competitive bicyclist who "had gone from winning races to losing races."The granulomatous pneumonitis in his lungs was comparable to hftp://www.latimes.conVHOME/NEWS/HEALTH/t000062124.htmi 7112/99 Sometmng in the water rage o or o "farmer's lung,"found in farmers exposed to moldy hay. Rose found the disorder in other young, otherwise fit lifeguards who had been diagnosed with asthma, flu, mononucleosis, even anxiety or malingering. The pool where they all worked had fountains and other features that produced an aerosol rich with bacteria killed by the chlorine. The more the lifeguards breathed in this mixture, the more their likelihood of developing the immune reaction. An ozone-based disinfection system installed at the pool has prevented recurrences, although Rose has seen similar cases of pneumonitis in hot tub users. So far, she says the "preponderance of evidence" indicates outdoor pools aren't a problem because the aerosols are diluted quickly by the air. Despite the plethora of pathogens in untreated coastal waters, Renneker says there are relatively few outbreaks of disease at the ocean, which he attributes to generally high standards of water treatment and low rates of many diseases in this country. As for that lone surfer, well, Renneker predicts that as coastal science blossoms, experts will identify a host of microbes that cause disease—and perhaps discover at the same time that surfers and others who are exposed regularly "actually develop a kind of immunity" that lets them feel as though they are alone riding those California waves. Hazards in a Drop of Water High concentrations of bacteria such as enlerocwcci and fecal coliform, viruses from human waste, and the phytoplankton that cause "red tide" may pose health risks for swimmers and surfers. Areas of high risk: • Near storm drains or river outlets • In shallower water(ankle deep) • In high-use freshwater bathing areas .Where pool water is cloudy Coovriaht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: WATER POLLUTION, OCEAN POLLUTION, SWIMMING, SURFING, B C , PUBLIC HEALTH, PUBLIC SAFE-TY. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. hftp:/twww.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/HEALTH/t000062124.html 7112/99 i GARDEN GROVE y ►Pate increases:The City Council will consider a proposed trash and sewer rate increase at a meeting at 7 p.m.Wednesday at the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Ave. Residents could pay up to$153 more each year for services,de- pending on which past of town they live in.City officials said the rate increases are necessary to operate and make repairs to the deteriorating systems,and to start a reserve account.Op- ponents will turn in petitions to try to stop the proposal. Fax hems to dty editor at (714)825-0434,or e-mail to doseupinIink.freedom.wm. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section I Page # Date Subject I�de �e�dot.� '�� S, 5 ��1�99 Ass2wlbly fell jlotl- Thursday,July 1, 1999 cityside Clean water activists sound off on bill ■The California Public offenders of the slate's clean Regional Water Duality Control Interest Research Groupwater laws. Board. It still pays to pollute," said 'It doesn't just apply le 61g(aryo- While the environmental lobbies for AssemblyIQrsten Armstrong, a spokes- '♦ woman for the Washington,D.C.- ftaiam.ll applies to Bvetruady.' 9roustr main tern, th are large Bill 1104 from citypier. based California Public interest Industrial polluters,the proposed P Curt a t exec d law also would ptmfsh individual Research support Croup. the S ant executive officer at homeowners and small business- EBoti BtN-YBrmoA In support of its claim, the the Santa Ana Regional Water es,he warned. group released a study last month Qml' Control Board "It doesn't just a to�a documenting 6.674 violations of corporations,' e said Pit applies HUNTINGTON REACH — the Clean Water Act between toeverybody." An environmental group spoke 1997 and 1999. Of Nose, only 44 "It's a nice symbol,right there, A few years ago, the agency out last week across the state, violations,or less than l%,result. of the ocean we're protecting," look action against individual including a press conference at ed in fines. Armstrong said. homeowners who had failed to the city's pier, to urge Governor The study did not consider Although imposing mandatory connect their septic tanks to the Gray Dave to sign into law a bill polluters in Orange County — penalties on polluters may sound local sewer system. Although lire aimed at beefing up fines for just Los Angeles, San Diego and good N theory,agen I-chergad law allowed 'huge- fines to be water polluters. the Central Valley — but the with -regulating water quality imposed, the water board dedd- n enacted,Assembly Bill 1104 environmentalists decided Surf need neribidty to enforce bona- ed to give the homeowners a Will establish, among other City would make a great back. don standards tu a fair wag said break because they made rela. things, mandatory minimum drop for a presentation of Neu Curt Beruhtold, assistant ezecv- tively little Income, Berchtold penalties for serious and repeat findings. live officer of the Santa Ana said. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times h�1�Fru 63R 711hq 11-1- . S,re T-lets l�sti HUNTINGTON BEACH Maahg sure tolbu flush ptopeft taps the cc ens of the city's Infra- structure Committee, a preliminary report presented at last week's meet- ing shows. But plenty of work re- mains-to be done before the group makes a foul decision on monitoring about $12 billion in infrastructure needs over the next TO years City consultant Gary Dysart isi t sur- prised that improving the city s sewer system means so much to the committee members. Undersized and detenorated sewer lines carry substantial consequences. such as ground contamination and backed- up toilets,he said. Other high-ranking concerns In- clude improving flood control facili- ties, residential streets, sidewalks and curbs,the report states. Main- tanning old parks and constructing new ones ranked relatively low. —Eros Ben-Yehuda,f110 W-7172.Ezr. 13 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings j Name of Paper Section Page # Date L Subject orange County Register f�e{Y GI3L/5 fUt,o LAGUNA BEACH Neighboring cities and the county have been checking how the city handles storm- drain runoff. During the summer,Laguna diverts runoff into its sewer system. This helped the city avoid at least three beach closures this year.The Board of Su- pervisors recently approved SM,000 for water-quality projects that could include Laguna-style diversion in other cities. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times Me+r� [38� Iv�zS'g I s4A+e W�4e c_ Tco;e ct Water Plan Needs a Boost For five years, federal and state agencies water supply. Without Cal-Fed, cities, farms have worked—sometimes struggled—with and environmental watchdogs are likely to farmers, environmentalists and urban water turn to the courts and regulators to settle agencies toward a sweeping plan to restore their disputes. That is no way to make such the environment of the Sacramento-San Joa- important,sweeping policy. qum Delta and also assure a steady supply of Neither Davis nor Babbitt was on hand Fri- high-quality water to cities and farms south day when officials released their report on of the delta.As one participant described the Cal-Fed proposals over the next seven years, process last Friday,it has been"slow,painful, costing an estimated$5 billion.A Babbitt as- onerous and debilitating." But the working sistant and Mary Nichols, Davis' resources forum known as Cal-Fed is about to make secretary, were present and strongly en- real decisions that will affect the environment dorsed the plan.But the perception among in- and water use in California for decades. siders is that commitment from the top is Unfortunately, the process appears to be weakening. losing momentum and the vigorous support Friday's event came as state and federal of- of key political leaders just when it needs ficials grappled with an environmental crisis them most.The closer Cal-Fed comes to mak- that forced them to severely cut back pump. ing real choices—new water storage reser mg from the delta.An unusual concentration voirs,for example, or increased conservation of the endangered delta smelt was being or both—the more contentious the debate is sucked into the giant pumps and an unaccept- likely to become.The next six months will be able number of the fish was killed. critical to the future of the process. That is Critics of Cal-Fed said the smelt incident why federal and slate leaders, particularly showed that five years of state and federal ef- Gov. Gray Davis, Interior Secretary Bruce forts to improve delta operations haven't Babbitt and President Clinton, need to give worked But Cal-Fed leaders said the problem Cal-Fed a strong vote of confidence right was exactly the sort that the project outlined now. Friday a designed to prevent. The Cal-Fed The State Water Project, which draws its leaders had it right Without Cal-Fed,Califor supplies from the delta,is a major purveyor of nia condemns itself to a bitter new round of water to 16 million Southern Californians via water battles.But if Cal-Fed is to succeed,Da- the Metropolitan Water District A healthy vis and Clinton need to demonstrate their coo- delta is vital to the quality and reliability of mitment to the only realistic solution to Call- Southern California's domestic and industrial fomia's constant water problems. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings ===Namaper Section Page # Date Subject Times M ction II g e 6Datei i }D x i c s z c w. a -�rer Deal Could Angeles Beach. covering s� Niles, lies at the mouth of the Los Angeles and San Gabriel riven. Stertll Hfliter With eO1° uW into of dO''� Managemerrt End ��y of cities fintoS InP the twoBay rivers, and then into San Pedro Say.potter- Underterms of me proposed loon of loran waterways has been a lispute Over longstanding problem compound- �me,LLost Argelegs Long onal 'ling'the problem is pollution geaer- WBterQualllyCadml Board,the •• cited by theporlsofLas Angeles and city must draft a storm water r•s-eO � T O(r "Wing Snch and fir oil refineries in n. management program.It mpunes: :11 iK`7{7L1L'11 11"if "WLaid week, Lo`ngBe '% last week, Long Beach officials •Control of Illegal discharges of r.�• were overjoyed when the em hun- Pollutants. �pp��7ff;;IASP a righter regulations on any new r3lecar�1W.P S mental organization Heal the Bay largescale residential or gave the citys beaches nearly commercial cunsuucaon. _ Enclung a three-year fight over straight A's in its grading system, Including preparation of storm fhfylementation of the federal but the regional water board has water mmgation plans by . ;Cogan Water Act•the city of Long identified a host of pollution prob- developersend retention of water Beach has reached a tentative lams linked to the rivers, flood onsae In 25%ofany newly ..:agteememwithstatewater officials control charnels and San Pedro landscaped areas. over a plan to deal with toxic storm and Alamitos bays, a creation ofa monhoring Aster plaguing Santa Monica and State water officials my that program to detect more than 170 '.'. ariPedrabays. pollutants commonly found in digerent pollutants entering .','The' proposed plain, expected to storm water include pathogens, waterways.Including oil.&ease, be ratified at a meeting of the Los heavy metals,pesticides,herbicides _ bacteria,kcal murder and Angeles Regional Water Quality and synthetic organic compounds hydrocarbons. emitrol Board on Wednesday, has such as fuels, waste o8, solvents. a Annual storm water reports the agreement of all sides in the lubricants and grease, all of which detailing levels of water Quality. * :11ailly dispute. pose a health threat to humans and a Establishment of a public "Acceptance of the agreement endanger Aquatic ecosystems. Intimation campaign almedm would settle a lawsuit filed by Long Under the proposed deal, which developers,residents and • '-Beach that has held up full Imple- goes further than the ongiml agree- schoolchildren. .,:menation of a rountywide storm moot.Long Beach would be required ::;,water cleanup plan. The plan was to draft a norm water management i'Initially approved in 1996 and Program that rover;such things as .-,agreed to by 84 cities, including mitigation of runoff for new commer- Santa Monica and]ors Angeles,as coal and residential construction.and _,,Wepa Los Angeles County. a program to identify and crack . Designed to handle Will cue down on illegal duschargas't®ahation threatening 70 miles of ,(p5 Angeles County coastline. It oils for such things as Periodic - .,_washing of grease and oil from Raking lots and educating business 3operaWrs and others on ways to avoid releasing pollutants into n"rm dons. - Some of the 84 cities that had signed the original storm wafer plan adopted a waitand-see atti- tude. after it was challenged by pong Beach,earimnmentalest cril• ti gy � Beach's opposition gave # m these cities who wanted to slow the program down" said Da- Heckman,an attorney with the Angeles office of the Natural urces Defense Counted. "Here we are, three years into a permit el nW a five-year term,and it is still notfullydeveloped" nws ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP' NA:K-w YOUR AO-IL:qr* Wednesday,June 23, I VILLA PARK he Serrano Water District has given the county money to invest, RELATED El making the Villa Park utility the first public agency since the bankruptcy to entrust its funds voluntarily with the county. B I O.C.SECTIONS MAIN PAGE Corwright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved NEWS BY y COMMUNITY O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. SPORTS PREPSPORTS BUSINESS SO CAL LIVING CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES I10VERTISEMEW WWr urvao n.a U How low can we go? Iw—s - oo le n ex ti Go httpJ/www.latimcs.wm4iOMEINEWSIORANGE/t000056539.htm] 623/99 News F FGo ie n ex FG0 g"'iggeital ORANGE COUNTY NEWS FIELP` 1 MAK'F V1V- - A0 :�r.l Wednesday,June 23, 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY By ELLEN MCCARTY,(714)965-7172.EAT. 15 fficials with the Orange County Water District have completed a RELATED study that shows the district will be able to move Santa Ana River water from Anaheim to Santiago Creek in Orange,where it will O.C.C.SEC I� I)•5 seep into the ground-water basin.The process could save up to$750,000 worth of river water per year that is otherwise discharged into the ocean, MAIN PAGE according to the Fountain Valley-based district.The Santiago Creek NEWS BY Recharge study found that the creek has the capacity to save up to 3,000 COMMON ffl' acre-feet of water per year during high-water years—enough water for 15,000 Orange County residents. The study found that recharging the SPORTS aquifers in Santiago Creek was effective and did not have any negative effects on subsurface conditions,including ground water quality. PREPSPORTS BUSINESS Convrteht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved SO CAL LIVING yy O SearchRANG COUNTY of theWATER Last gt1es7WA fm —ORstories about: CALENDAR ORANGE COUNTY WAU13LIC TR KS.WATER—ORANGE d to look f st GE COUNTY e e PUBLIC WORKS.You will om be Merged to look for CAI-ENpAR stories,only to retrieve one. WEEKEND HOME DESIGN Co T.V.TIMES ADVERTIgQAENT rntrrarl Yrn h How low can we go? ews --� Oo ie n ex _ 00 http://www.latimes.com/HOMEJNEWS/0RANGE/t000056517.hhnl 623199 Page 1 of 1 McIntyre, Donald From: Hodges, Ed Sent: Tuesday,July 06, 1999 4:46 PM To: McIntyre, Donald Subject: FW: CNGVC Update (AS 71) FYI. Don't want to see you get blindsided. Ed Hodges Director of General Services Administration Direct Une: 714-593-7200 Fax: 714-962-8379 e-mail: ehodges@ocsd.com --0riginal Message— From:Bill Fairbaim Imaillo:bfairbaim n cslifngv.orgl Sent:Tuesday,July 06, 1999 4:43 PM To:Undiwlosed.Recipicnts(amail.c .corn Subject:CNGVC Update(AB 71) AS 71 PASSES SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE— HOV lane access for fleet and private ILEVs moved a major step closer to reality Tuesday when it passed it's last legislative policy hurdle,the Senate Transportation Committee.The initial committee vote was 8.1 with the role left open to three additional members. Author Assemblyman Jim Cunneen was compelled by the committee to accept two amendments that do not substantively reduce its effect or intent, but one amendment may make implementation more difficult.The committee declined to establish a new ILEV license plate, citing a long-standing but often ignored committee policy against creation of new"special interest"license plates. (Ironically,the committee approved a new Ronald Reagan commemorative plate only an hour before.)This change will likely result in the creation of a new, DMV produced and issued decal similar to the federal EPA ILEV decals. Each qualifying vehicle's registration slip is also likely to bear an ILEV identifier. The less consequential amendment to the bill is a sunset date, after 7 or 8 years,to be determined by agreement between the author and committee staff. Steve Kedh, CEO of InfoSeek, made a personal appeal for AS 71. CNGVC's Greg Vlasek testified in support of the license plate approach and also exhibited to the committee ILEV labels provided by Honda. Other witnesses in support were CaIETC,American Lung Association, SCAQMD, BAAQMO, GM, SOCal Edison and Union of Concerned Scientists. Only the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority testified in opposition. Thanks are due to Dave Modisette and CaIETC for close work with the author to frame strategy. Thanks are due to all CNGVC members and others who wrote or called committee members. When amendment language is ironed out,the bill proceeds to Senate Appropriations where it stands a strong chance of passage due to its minimal cost to the State. 7/7/1999 McIntyre, Donald From: Miles, Patrick Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 11:02 AM To: Y2K Steering Committee Cc: EMT; Information Technology Subject: D.C. Prepares for Y2K System Failures This information should not be a surprise if you either read or saw the 60 Minutes piece on Y2K. Let me know if you are not familiar with the story and 1 will send you a copy. The District government, recognizing that its year 2000 repair program likely will not be completed on time, is planning a massive New Years Eve mobilization of emergency personnel and other staff to ensure that critical city services are not interrupted if computer systems fail. Police will be stationed at more than 120 locations across the city,working 12-hour shifts,to take walk-in requests for emergency services. Twenty-one 'warming centers;each supplied with food,water and cots,will open. School crossing guards will be on call, ready to replace traffic lights at major intersections.And D.C. General Hospital will have extra staff members-as many as 175-on site. These are just a few of the 88 contingency and emergency plans the District is feverishly working to put in place by the end of the year. Similar efforts are underway across the United States among governments and private companies, but in the District, officials have acknowledged the city is so far behind on its Y2K fix that it may have to rely on some of thew'work-around'techniques. "Because we began late,there may be things that suffer an interruption that we did not completely get to;said D.C. Chief Technology Officer Suzanne J. Peck."Within our agencies ... in some function, a handful may fall temporarily' Officials are confident that most of these plans-even those that will be put into effect regardless of any system failure- will not be needed, and that even in the District, Y2K will be one of the century's most hyped nonevents. The D.C. Water and Sewer Authority,for example,will spend more than $1 million to rent several locomotive size generators to ensure that water will Bow if the electricity goes out. The Public Works Department will ensure that the city has 87,000 gallons of vehicle fuel available, double the normal supply. Extra truck pans, backup generators and other supplies also are on order. Plans have even been ma r trash collection crews(they would work day and night),tree maintenance(complaints would be taken at the Reevc micipal Center on 14th Street NW) and rat patrol (private exterminators would be used). There's more on the story below: httD/A~.washinatonpost.comAvo-sw/business/londterrn/v2k/v2k.htm Thanks, Patrick B. Miles Dhectw of Infomeflon Technology Onrnte County Sanllerbn District (714)5 7280 Office (714)343.1730 Cellular/Pager pmika®ocsd.com 1 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES. 0 0 925 L Street,Suite 1400 Sacramento,CA 95814 TEL:(916)446.0388-FAX:,91614484808 June 24, 1999 TO: CASA Member Agencies CASA Attorneys FROM: Mike Dillon RE: Capistrano Beach Water District v.Taj Development Corporation A significant decision,favorable to all sewer and water agencies, has recently been handed down by the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District,Division Three, in a case entitled Cgpistrano Beach Water District v. Taj Development Corporation, et al. At issue in the case was the applicability of the Fees Mitigation Act that was adopted into law as AB 1600(with some later amendments), and found in Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. As described below, the Court has held that the provisions of that Act are not applicable to sewer and water agencies when they adopt and impose connection fees upon property owners. The history of connection fees and related statewide statutes has been of utmost concern, and required active involvement by the CASA Attorney's Committee for many years. Members of the Committee have assisted in the drafting of original legislation,and prepared briefs and other presentation materials when undesirable provisions were offered for consideration. It has been a long-standing opinion of the Attorney's Committee that the statutory provisions in Section 66000 are not applicable to sewer and water agencies because these agencies do not "approve development projects". Such approval is a land use power granted solely to cities and counties, and the issuance of a connection permit, and required payment of a connection or capital facilities capacity charge, is only incidental and not part of the land use approval process. This Court of Appeal decision squarely held that our interpretation has been,and is, correct. There is a secondary holding in the case,which is of near equal value and importance. The Court held that there are no provisions within those Chapters of the Code requiring a refund of the fees collected; specifically,connection charges, if they are not used by the sewer and water agencies applicable to cities who impose certain development fees as a condition of approval of a development project. This is a very important ruling because our Member Agencies,and other water agencies, have struggled with the segregation of accounting requirements that might otherwise be required by these Sections of the Code. The case originated out of Capistrano Beach Water District, which,effective January 1, 1999, was consolidated into our member agency, South Coast Water District. Capistrano Beach had imposed a connection fee,which had been paid. However, upon the lapse of five years, the developer of the hotel demanded a refund of the fees on the basis that the District could not prove that it had expended the fees which it paid to the District,or could cite they they had been used for facilities specifically and directly benefitting the hotel. The developer requested a refund, which the District denied. The recent decision,of course,affirms the District's position, and no refund is required. The case was originally handled by counsel for Capistrano Beach Water District. To provide separate legal briefing related to the impacts of SB 1760-Haynes(Chapter 644, 1998 Statutes), which amended Section 66013,the Court of Appeal's counsel requested assistance from Tom Woodruff, General Counsel for South Coast Water District,who has been an active member of the Attorneys' Committee dealing with the original AB 1600 and SB 1760. Tom assisted in the preparation of the supplemental brief to the Court of Appeal and provided much of the legislative historical background that had been prepared and put together by himself and the CASA Attorneys. capbeach.mem _. . �,. . . .. . -a- . ... _ [Previous Doc l ext Doc NEWS Thursday, June 24, 1999 NEWS B LOGS A Natural Perspective PQL[CE S P SPORTS ■ Better storm drain system key to cleaner oceans COMMgNITY FORUM CALENDAR he people of northern Orange County will be spending at CWEEK MOMS least$1.5 billion over the next two decades to upgrade our sewage treatment facilities. Writing that out in numerals is DAMYPILOT impressive: $1,500,000,000. That's a lot of zeros. The people who will actually do the spending are the folks at the Orange County Sanitation District. This is an independent district that provides sewage treatment service for most of Orange County north of the El Toro "Y." They are good at what they do. Beach closures from sewage spills are fairly common along the Southern California coast. South Orange County has some other, small sanitation districts that caused beach closures in recent years, and Los Angeles has them regularly. But this district has never had such an event. In fact, it is one of the most highly honored districts of its type in the country. Later this summer, the district's board of directors will vote on a massive plan to upgrade our sewers and treatment facilities. Part of the overall program will be an enormous water reclamation project that will recycle treated water and pump it back underground. The main purpose is to reduce Orange County's dependence on high-priced— and low-quality-- Colorado River water. A side benefit is that by reclaiming the water, the district won't have to pump as much waste water out to sea. Sewage treatment separates the water from most of the solid waste. These solids— euphemistically referred to as "biosolids" — are trucked out to cotton fields and used as fertilizer. This is the environmentally friendly thing to do with them. Up until five or six years ago, they were simply dumped in the landfill. The treated waste water then gets pumped out to sea through a 5-mile-long pipeline. That water is a long way from pure. It still contains microscopic dissolved solids to the extent of about /searchcgi?action=View&VdkVgwKey=%2E%2E%2Fo/a2E%2Eo/QFvol7%2FCNS%5FDA 6/24/1999 17,000 tons per year. This material winds up being dispersed in the ocean water. The major choice facing the district is how much money to spend—in addition to the$1.5 billion— to reduce the amount of these dissolved solids in the discharge water. For-an additional $400 million, that annual tonnage could be cut from 17,000 to 8,000. It's important to remember that the district's waste water discharge is not associated with any negative impact on human health. It's true that surfers frequently come down with infections from bacteria in the water.But the source of this contamination is not the sewer system. It is the storm drain system. Most storm drains, unlike sewers, are operated by the county, not a special district, and are overseen by the county's board of supervisors. These drains discharge into shallow water right at the shoreline. It is bacteria in the runoff from these drains that makes it a bad idea to go into the ocean during or right after a rainstorm. The storm runoff also carries with it enormous amounts of ugly debris that costs us a small fortune to remove from our harbors, wetlands, and beaches. Treated sewage discharge is a minor issue compared with storm runoff. Does sewage discharge affect fish or other marine life? The sanitation district spends more than $1 million a year on biological monitoring and the results are pretty clear: fish and other creatures, even right near the outfall pipe, are abundant and they are free of disease and chemical contamination. What we say is this: the people of Orange County ought to spend the additional $400 million. But the money ought to be put where it will do the most good, and that is cleaning up the storm drain system, rather than buying more sewage treatment than is really necessary. The ocean has been good to us. Now it's our turn to be good to the ocean. VIC LEIPZIG and LOU MURRAY are Huntington Beach residents and environmentalists. They can be reached at vicleipvg(allaol.com . Feedback to hbindy(nlearthlink.net o. a om a co ISitsindex Wool [Previous Docl —W Doc] .../searchcgi?action=View&VdkVgwKey=%2E%2E°/o2F%2E%2E%2Fvol7%2FCNS%5FDA 6/24/1999 ews �o ie n ex ca II I COMMENTARY HELP Mon ay. one 21. 1999 Saving Water © e"Water Conservation Efforts Begin to Pay Off in Southland."June I5: Saving 9 billion gallons of water a year with new toilets is good,but it represents only about 1%of the water used by urban Southern California.One inch of rainfall overjust the city of Los Angeles is ADVERTSEMEK about twice that much water. The real potential for conserving water is more outside the house than inside the house.The automatic sprinkler systems that operate even when it - is raining are perhaps our biggest waste of water.Ten or more times as much water as with new toilets can be conserved if irrigation of plantings were applied only according to need. Soil improvement can help achieve that,as too much water runs off soil instead of into soil. N ARTHUR WALLACE Los Angeles CoyynBht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved cSearch the archives rithe Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will notM charged to look for stories,only to rtaieve one. �77:=- GO I n BX GO http://www.latimes.com/HOMENEWSICOMMENT/1000055687.hml 6/21199 [News __.. j GO I Itex F1: GO • / + e e ORANGE QOUNTY NEWS HELP?. Monday,June 21, 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH By ERONBEN-YENUDA,(714)965.7172..EX! 13 he city faces the greatest risk in Orange County of water RELATED Ej contamination from a gas additive called methyl tertiary-butyl ether,Public Works Director Robert Beardsley said,yet . . ECTI NS government agencies responsible for supervising the cleanup effort are dragging then feet.That's what prompted him to ask the City Council MAIN PAGE recently to pass a resolution demanding that immediate action be taken to NEWS BY eliminate the suspected carcinogen,which leaks from underground storage COMMUNITY Woks and threatens water supplies.The council passed the resolution. 'There should be a higher level of concern for the problem,'Beardsley SPORTS said. PREPS CoovriaIn 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved BUSINESS SO CAI.LIVING O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: WATER POLLUTION—ORANGE COUNTY HUNTINGTONnIYT VCAI-- CALENDAR PUBLIC ORKS.You will not be charge to look for stories,only m remeve one. CALENDAR WEEK-END HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT 777... a>�►,�n [News ,:G GO Ie ❑ eX 'F GO bttp://www.latimm.com/HOMENEWS/ORANGE/t000055712.html 6/21/99 newsI Home Page _._-�- m oCfYRlafaRCota THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER f REIP I SEARCH CaliforniaIrTLY HOMEPAGE TODAY'S NEYS Sewage floods park after Y2K test goes :„;�1ia Cation awry -fond ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE PUBLIC WORKS: Four million gallons flow from a CLASSIFIED FINANCE manhole in Van Nuys during a simulated power failure. COOLM NS rxEws CRIME a COURTS June 18, 1999 EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT �ER TRAVEL FUN It GAMES The Associated Press HEALTH a FITNESS USERTYONLINE LMNG It SHOPPING LOS ANGELES—A water reclamation plant malfunctioned during a POLmCS a Y2K test and spilled 4 million gallons of sewage into a San Fernando GOVERNMENT Valley park,authorities said. REAL ESTATE SCIENCE a TECHNOLOGY The effluent flowed out of a manhole near the Donald C.Tillman plant in vROMOMOTIONS Van Nuys between about 10 p.m. Wednesday and 12:30 a.m.Thursday, SPORTS a RECREATION said Linda Aparicio,a spokeswoman for the city Department of Public WEATHER Works. The effluent flowed about 100 yards into a park.Crews worked through the night to vacuum up the spill,but Los Angeles County health officials recommended that a portion of the park remain closed for two days as a precaution,Aparicio said. The sewage system was back in operation by Thursday morning. The spill occurred while the plant was testing a Year 2000 problem scenario in which power failed and an emergency generator kicked in. The generator worked,but a gate to a western San Fernando Valley sewage line that was closed during the test failed to reopen,Aparicio said. "Our computers did not tell us that gate was closed,"she said."No one knew that sewage was backing up from our west main Malt." It was unclear whether the problem was related to the test or was coincidental,Aparicio said. al newaPamr In Orai caunty.Caninniii Regisfier' Ceeneconneinae Orati,am ny RLguler Please aen0 mmmaMa M ggjH er®I nkaeedom mm hnp://www.ocregister.com/news/califomia/18spill.sh=l 6/IM9 [News GC 19 It ex n., GG ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP i-=—. aparlmentsrmm LosAngeles _ Take a Virtual Tour. GO] Thursday,,June 17, 1999 IRVINE By TARJQ MAL/K. (949) 764-4312 esidents will pay the same price for water this year if,as expected, RELATED the Irvine Ranch Water District Board of Directors adopts its final budget June 28.Officials held the first of two workshops Monday O.C.SE TIONS to discuss the district's budget. The district hasn't raised its service charges since 1992,and the cost of water has remained constant since 1994, MAIN PAGE spokesman Dave Ferguson said. NEWS BY Although the district's annual expenses continue to rise,it has managed COMMUNITY to keep prices stable by staff reorganization and cost containment,said Paul D.Jones,the district's general manager. "We've been able to eliminate 5 1/2 SPORTS positions without layoffs by combining responsibilities,'he said. PREP SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved BUSINESS .I SO CAL LIVING 0 Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT,WATER--ORANGE COUNTY,UTILITY CALENDAR RATES.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT MI ews Go le n ex � Go http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000054617.hml 6/17/99 orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper I section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times I NEWPORT BEACH FlndIngs from an 31month Inns& gatlon conclude that the Orange County Sanitation 1Nstrict was re- sponsiblefor a massive sewage spill into Newport Harbor last summer during construction of the Arches Bridge. A report by the California Water Control Hoard places r spmtsibility directly on the dsr trict's shoulders and calls for a matnmum of SM OD01n fines. The Spill occurred July 22when a construction worker struck a 24- inch teener line, spewing about 100,000 gallant of raw sewage onto Pacific Coast Highway and a park- ing lot adjacent to Arches Bridge. —Gres Aidi no.(oral 574,uus �'I _ __ _=_ �"M � r. r.p dr ...,�vql ' 4 -�.r•p� �pp�•nnr�q.r .-y. I i CLIENT Orange County Sanitation District Ar1N Michelle Tuchm p._6n NMS 7/49620356 "I'l KF7 Radio TIr,1E 6:02 am LSTE 611"9 I;E 621199 i KEN GALLAGHER: More sewage will be flushed into the ocean in Orange County. Let's go live to KFI's Jay Lawrence. He says the growing population in the county is putting pressure on the sewer system. i JAYLAWRENCE: Well,right nowtheSaoftationDistricrtllpcharges about 17,OOOrmetric.0a "W �- water into the sea annually, and officials say it's a higher level of purity than what's required. However,under a new proposal, the district wants to up the amount of poop by 3,000 metric tons and allow dirtier water to be flushed into the ocean Officials say the increase is needed because by the year 2020 800,000 more people are expected to move into the county. They also say the dirtier water will not affect marine life, and there's no threat to swimmers or surfers because the pipes are 200-feet deep and five miles off the coast. Live in Orange County, Jay Lawrence,KFI News. r I C;:Er4l Orange County Sanitation District e7;•i Michelle Tuchman 3p„ News 716 962 0356 _:ai KNX Radio I1111 6:11 am fG=:iE 6118M T.i: 621/99 LINDA NUNFZ: In Orange County, they're preparing for an increase in population, and the Sanitation District says that means 17% more waste will be discharged into the ocean. By 2020, about 800,000 more l people are expected to move into north and central Orange County. That means a total of 20,000 metric tons of sewage would be dumped into the ocean-each yea.--- But environmental engineers claim it would not affect marine life because Orange County already cleans its waste water to a higher level of purity than the law requires. r I V it Orange County Sanitation DiStrict Michelle Tuchman r Lf" Ncws 7149620356KFWB Radio i•.i= 6:51 am ..;[ 6/1 R/99 6/21199 DAN AVEY: Environmentalists in Orange County are worried about a measure that could mean a sharp rise in the amount of waste dumped in the ocean. i The environmental impact report says the proposal would alsoael-the County Sanitation District dump waste -- - - water that's slightly dirtier than what's allowed now. Consultants hired by the county say the change would not present a danger to marine life. Proponents say they need increased allowance as the population continues to grow in the north county area. ' � I Suez Lyonnaise to Bid $4. 1 Billion for U.S. Firm position In water-treatment services. It Is offer one-stop shopping for energy,water In buying Nalco,Suez Lyonnaise would Nalco Deal Would Propel the second U.S.acquisition in this field by and waste management to Its Industrial also assume its debts outstanding totaling Suez Lyonnaise this month:Less than two customers. $496 million. The Nalco acquisition cmtltl French Utility to No. I weeks ago,the company splashed out$415 Nalco would be a choice target for this slightly dilute Suez's earnings per share In million to buy Pittsburgh-based water- strategy because the company has more 2000, but people with knowledge of the In Treatment of Water treatment company Calgon Corp.Also this than 45,000 industrial customers in 120 transaction say It would increase earnings month, a consortium led by Suez Lyon- countries in a broad variety of businesses. per share from 2001 onward.In a full year, naise agreed to pay$957 million for 42%of Nalco posted 1998 sales of$1.57 billion and the transaction could produce savings of By Tuomas Kamm Chile's state-owned water utility Empress profit of$37.9 million,which Included a$180 $100 million. Staff Reporter of THE WJv.STREET Joaaxu. Metropolitan de Obras Sanitarian,which million reorganization charge.Nithoutthat Both Suez Lyonnaise and Its main rival, PARTS—Continuing its American shop. supplies five million customers in Santi- charge,Nalco's net would have been$154.9 fellow French utility Vivendi SA, have ping spree,French utility Suez Lyonnaise ago,the capital. million. People familiar with the Industry competed with each other in make big U.S. desEaux SA is set to announce today that it News Conference Scheduled say Nalco has looked for an Industrial part- acquisitions In recent months. Even as Is launching a$4.1 billion tender offer for ner m branch out Into new services. E.J. Suez Lyonnaise was expanding, Vivendl Suez Lyounaisehadnoofflclalmmment shelled out$970 million this month to bu Nalco Chemical Co., according to people on the Nalco transaction,but has scheduled Moone remain ief execu- Y familiar with the transaction. live,scowould remain in his Job if the transac- Superior Services Inc.,a Milwaukee waste- familiar March, s news conference for this afternoon. A [ton is management company. Under terms of the bid,which people fa- spokesman for Nalco also declined to com- Pco'ssThedeain tendered p io and - March, mlllar with the transaction say is recom- ment, beyond pointing to a statement is- 50.190 of Nalco's shares being tendered and CA p.,a paid water-treatment billion for U-S. Filter mended by the Naperville,Ill based com- sued by the company last Thursday saying approval by U.S.ant itrnst authorities. p'senio/rritnduslryn official saidthe pany's board eM management, Suez Ly- it was in talks with an unspecified company Acquisitions to Boost Sales French companies appear to be trying to onnaise will offer$53 a share for Nalco,the about"a possible business combination." For Suez Lyonnaise, buying Nalco capitalize on a wave of privatization of wa- world's leading producer of watertreat- The transaction is part of Suez Lyon- would significantly Increase its size In the ter distribution by U.S.municipalities that ment chemicals. The offer represents a naise's strategy of growing In its core busi- water business, giving it critical mass in is causing a shakeout in the Industry In the 24% premium over Nalco's closing price nesses of energy, water and waste man- the U.S.and European markets.The acqui- U.S."It's not abnormal that when there's Friday on the New York Stock Exchange of agement and expanding Its international sition of Nalco and Calgon would Increase movement In the world's No.1 market,the $42.50. Over a longer term, It is a much presence,particularly in the U.S.market. Suez Lyonnalse's annual sales In the water world's two top water companies, which higher premium, as Nalco's shares have By gaining control of Nalco, Suez Lyon. business to 7.4 billion euros ($7.72 billion) happen to be French, are on the move, gained 227.in the past 10 days. naise Chairman Gerard Mestrallet is also from 5.12 billion eum previously.Suez Ly- too,"the executive said. If completed,the transaction would pro- hoping to further advance his aim of build- onnaise posted 1999 sales of31.36 billion an- —Susan Carey in Chicago pal Suez Lyonnaise into the world's leading inga "multiservice utility" that seeks to ros and profit of one billion euros. contributed to this article. [News • s! .- '0310M ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS HELP`Jh Wednesday, une 16, 1999 County Closes Books on Bankruptcy Story ■Finances:Dropping last lawsuit from 1994 debacle clears way for it and cities, schools and other agencies to split$860.7 million recouped in settlements. By E SCOTT RECKARD,JEAN O.PASCO. Times Staff Writers ore than four years after its financial meltdown caused the nation's RELATED in municipal bankruptcy,Orange County on Tuesday dropped its final lawsuit from the debacle,clearing the way for 200 cities, E ISN'T ON schools,other agencies and the county itselfto split up S860.7 million. N W BY The money,generated from other lawsuits by the county,will nearly crr make whole most of the investments in the county treasury and is far more than most observers had predicted.It will be released this fall,bringing to a SPORTS close a fiasco that shook Well Street and undermined investors'faith in what had been considered an ultra-safe municipal bond market. PREP SPORTS Losses from longtime county Treasurer Robert L.Citron's bad bets on low interest rates also prompted predictions that public services would be BUSINES devastated in one of America's wealthiest counties. But by cutting its budget,diverting funds from roads and beaches and LIFE&STYLE taking on a whopping$I I billion in new debt,the cash-strapped county CALENDAR and its wealthy transit agency repaid bondholders in full--though a year late—and kept other agencies from calla se. CALENDAR Rising interest rates in 1994 caused the county to lose more than$1.6 WICEND billion in two investment pools administered by Citron.Schools,cities and other agencies had poured$7 billion into the pools.At the time of the HOME DESIGN bankruptcy,the pools heldjust 77 cents of every dollar invested. Schools—the top priority in the cowry's bankruptcy escape plan—will COMMENTARY have recovered 97%of their investments once they receive thew share of proceeds from the lawsuit settlements,county officials said.Cities and T.V.TIMES public agencies will recover 93%.But the comfy's own funds will get back just 35 cents for every dollar of losses,according to figures provided by Tom Beckett,public finance manager for the county. The$860.7-million recovery,including nearly$450 million from Citron's main brokerage,Merrill Lynch&Co.,"vastly exceeded what AOVE"SEMEW anyone expected"at the county,schools and cities when the litigation began,said J.Michael Hennigan,one of the county's lead lawyers. Investment experts too were left"slack jawed"by the success of the suit,said Zane Mann,publisher of the California Municipal Bond Advisor. News Mann initially had called the suits nonsense,joking that the county would do better suing the psychics and astrologers that Citron had consulted rather than the county's broken,lawyers,accountants and bond raters. .4iNOWNED The county settled Tuesday with the bond-rating service Standard& MERCEDES Poots.It had sued S&P for more than S2 billion,accusing the firm of BUAL!IY breach of contract and professional misconduct in failing to sound the alarm about Citron's strategies in 1993 and 1994,when S&P gave is highest ratings to the county's bonds. S&P Admits Nothing in'Very Taken Settlement' In the end,S&P admitted no wrongdoing and agreed to refund just S 140,000,representing a partial repayment of fees it charged the county for rating services in 1994.The amount is a"very token settlement"amounting to a fraction of the firm's yearly legal fees in the case,noted Jahn C.Coffee, a Columbia University specialist in securities law. The county decided to seek a settlement after a series of adverse legal hap://www.latimes.com/liOME/NEWS/ORANGEIBUSTNESS/topaory.htmi 6/16/99 rulings that would have made it much more difficult to win a major judgment against the ratings firm. Despite S&P's victory,the county's total recovery"far exceeds the norm in securities litigation,"Coffee said,adding that it is particularly impressive given Citron's recklessness before the bankruptcy and guilty plea to fraud charges afterward County lawyers calculated that if the extra earnings from Citron's aggressive investments in 1992 and 1993 are subtracted from the losses of more than S 1.6 billion in 1994,the net loss is about$900 million—less than the amount recovered by the lawsuits. The county's law firm,Hannigan,Mercer&Bennett of Los Angeles,had reached a$21-million settlement earlier this month with the other remaining defendants, 12 Wall Street firms that had extended Citron credit or sold him volatile securities. But those and all the other recovered funds likely would have been tied up for months or even years while the S&P case dragged on,officials said. Attorneys from the firm met with representatives of the county and other agencies to discuss the S&P suit—a"very difficult case that was going to take a very,very long time,"said Hannigan,the county lawyer. .we had collected this amazing sum of money that in all probability was going to have to await the resolution of this case before it could be distributed,"Hannigan said."There was near-unanimous support for the proposition that we had gone far enough,succeeded enough. . ..It's like a football game. You're not just playing against one person." Former California Treasurer Thomas W.Hayes,who oversaw the lawsuits on behalf of invasion in the county pools,said the U.S.district and bankruptcy courts in Santa Ana will probably take about 120 days,or until October,to give final biasing to the settlements. "1 don't anticipate anybody trying to slow this down,"he said. "I'm just happy to have it resolved.The people of Orange County are getting back quite a bit of money,and I just want to see it distributed now." County and OCTA Teamed Up for Bailout The county shouldered most of the financial burden for the treasury collapse.County officials recognized that the only way to mollify irate investors was by repaying most of what they'd lost,giving priority to schools. They hoped to persuade voters in June 1995 to approve a half-cent increase in the county sales tax,but wound up borrowing heavily when that failed,and diverting state transit funds,property taxes and motor vehicle license fees that otherwise would have gone to the county and the Orange County Transportation Authority. By allowing transit funds to be diverted to repay$202 million in new bonds,the transportation authority also took on a large share of the bailout. But that money aside,the authority will have recovered 92%when the settlements are distributed. Former authority executive director Stan Oftelie,who chaired a committee of pool creditors after the bankruptcy,said the county's settlement of the final lawsuit took many officials by surprise. Public agencies around the county haven't plugged the settlement money into their budgets because no one knew when it would become available,he said. "There s a saying that the world doesn't end with a bang,it ends with a whimper,"Oftelie said."There are still a few more steps before the process is over." A Pleasant Surprise for Several Agencies Anaheim officials were among thou surprised by the settlement,said city spokesman Bret Colson. Because Anaheim had large budget reserves,the bankruptcy never interfered with major projects or day-to-day operations.But the recovered money"will allow us to more fully fund projects on the west side of the city in addition to replenishing our reserves,"Colson said. Previous defendants who settled with the county include auditor KPMG Peat Marwick LLP(MOM which paid S61.4 million;Wall Street firms Morgan Stanley,Dean iner($69.6 million),Credit Suisse First Boston ($32.5 million)and Nomura Securities International($47.9 million),and law firms LeBoeuf,Lamb,Green&MacRae(S45 million)and Brown& Wood(p1MM(S23 million).None admitted any wrongdoing. http.,//www.latimm.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/BUSTNESSttopstory.html 6116M The$860.7 million also includes$27.7 million that Merrill Lynch paid to settle a criminal investigation by then-Dist.Any Mike Capizzi,again without admitting wrongdoing,and$25.8 million in interest accumulated on payments so far. The resolution of the county's suits leaves one significant lawsuit remaining:a separate action against Merrill Lynch filed by 14 cities and agencies that,unlike other investors in the county treasury,chose not to surrender to the county their right to sue the brokerage. Their attorneys have suggested the suit could recover perhaps$50 million in losses,costs, interest and damages. It is pending in Contra Costa County Superior Court. A Merrill Lynch spokesman declined to discuss prospects for a settlement. Michael Kahn,a lawyer for the cities and agencies suing the brokerage, said there are no settlement talks,adding that he will push for the earliest possible trial when the two sides remm to court next month. "We've gotten most of our money,but we want all of our money,"Kahn said."Our clients believe that Merrill Lynch's behavior should be exposed to the public,and when ajury hears the full story,they will be appalled." Of the total recovered in the county's suits,$9.7 million will go to Hayes,the former state treasurer overseeing the lawsuits.The formula to pay Hayes,devised by the agencies that lost money,called for him to get nothing until settlements totaled$200 million,and then 1 1/2%of anything overthat. Times staff writer Greg Hernandez also contributed to this report. • rr Financing the Bankruptcy Orange County emerged from its 1994 bankruptcy in 1996,but will continue paying for it well into the next century.The county borrowed about$I billion to restore most losses suffered by the 200 agencies that lost money when two county investment pools collapsed.Status of the debt, which won't be repaid until 2026.Dollar amounts in millions: Program:Recovery Certificates of Participation Total borrowed:$760.8 1999-2000 payment:$62.5 Repayment due:2026 Revenue Source:Diverted state transit dollars that would have gone to the Orange County Transportation Authority,plus property tax revenues that would have gone to the commy's parks department,flood control district and redevelopment agency.Diversions and in 2016. rr• Program:Series A Recovery Bonds Total borrowed:$279.8 I999-2000 payment:$14.5 Repayment due:2015 . Revenue source: State motor-vehicle license fees that otherwise would be available to the county general fund.County intends to use proceeds from the bankruptcy lawsuits to pay$247.5 million still owed on the bonds. • r • Program: Special Financing Authority Revenue Bonds Total borrowed:$155 1999-2000 payment:$7.5 Repayment due:2014 Revenue source:Delinquent property taxes.related penalties/interest Source:County of Orange;Graphics repotting by JEAN O.PASCO/ Los Angeles Times qCo ri t 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved o Search the archives of the Los Angcics Times for similar stories abom: SETTLEMENTS.BANKRUPTCY,ORANGE COUNTY—FINANCES, SECURITIESINDUSTRY—bullb ST ARD&DOORS CORP. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/BUSINESS/topstory.hmrl 6/Ifr/99 news MM91stWr THE ORANGE cOUNTY REGISTER ' HELP E SEARCH top stories HOMEPAGE TODAY NEWS An ugly chapter draws to a close F""P'°' :Fmnt ma -Nation A4M O.C. BANKRUPTCY: The county's settlement of the last AUTOMOTTIIVE remaining lawsuit in the case is small in numbers but CLASSIFIED FINANCE large in meaning. COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME a COURTS .tune 16, 1999 EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAINMENT& By RONALD CAMPBELL •RAveL The Orange County Register FUN&GAMES HEALTH A FITNESS U&ERTYONLINE Orange County declared peace in in war on Well Street Tuesday,writing LIVING&SHOPPING an end to the county bankruptcy. GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE The county dropped its last remaining lawsuit,against bond-rating agency SCIENCE A TECHNOLOGY Standard&Pools,for a token S 140,000. SERVICES a PROMOTIONS SPORTS&RECREATION The settlement clears the way for the payment of SS30 million in legal WEATHER settlements to the county,lout cities and schools. By the counry's own reckoning,hers about enough money—coupled with former county Treasurer Robert L.Citron's excessive profits in the early 1990s—to wipe clean the losses taxpayers suffered when Citron's investment pool imploded in December 1994.It is so much money,in fact, that there was little chance ajudge would award the county more. "We were cooked in our own juices,"county attorney J. Michael Hennigan said. Still,the county's attorneys had hoped for more.A year ago,they were seeking$2 billion from Standard&Poor's. Even after the rating agency won a crucial pretrial motion a few months ago,the county still was hoping for$500 million. But m the courtroom odds lengthened and local governments grew impatient for the money they had already won,the attorneys decided to settle. "We were motivated to not tie up these funds,"Hennigan said. "The cost of continued litigation and holding these funds win really critical,"said Irvine City Manager Paul Brady Jr. Standard&Poor s General Counsel Kenneth M.Victor hailed the settlement as"a complete business and legal victory."The county made no effort to contradict hum. The$140,000 payment is less than the county's legal team spent in a typical week in 1997,the last year for which records are available. The payment is"better than nothing,"Hennigan said."They said, Not a http://www.ocmgister.com/news/oclit0l 6w.shtml 6/16/99 penny,not a penny;and they finally got to a penny." S&P characterized the payment as a refund of the money Orange County paid for bond ratings in 1994. Vittor described the payment as a"customer relations issue,"stemming from what he called the county's"fundamental misunderstanding"of S&P's job. Other,much larger firms paid tens,even hundreds of millions of dollars to buy peace with the county.But the law and timing favored S&P. S&P differed from the other Wall Street defendants. Merrill Lynch,which eventually settled for 5437 million,had sold the county billions of dollars in high-risk securities.Auditor KPMG Peat Marwick,which paid $75million,had missed warning signs in the county's books.Bond counsel LeBoeuf Lamb Greene&MacRae,which paid S45 million,had supervised the county's inaccurate bond disclosures. S&P's"offense"was to give high ratings to county bonds.The county argued that if S&P had done a good job and issued lousy ratings,the county would never have sold the bonds. S&P wrapped itself in the First Amendment,declaring its one-or two-lener bond ratings"the world's shortest editorials." In March,U.S.District Judge Gary L.Taylor ruled that the First Amendment did indeed protect S&P.The county would have to prove that S&P acted with "actual malice"when it gave high marks to county bonds. The county appealed,arguing that Taylors decision"substantially raises the bar on the county's burden of proof."The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Taylor. Meanwhile,settlements from other defendants were piling up and creating a legal headache for the county. For well over a year,attorneys for the county and its foes have been arguing over whether the county could collect more than it lost.The county argued that there was no limit,"but candidly,"Hennigan said,"it's not a powerful argument." Then there was the question ofjust how much the county lost. The comay's attorneys had argued that the taxpayers lost S1.6billion to $1.8billion when Citron's investments went bad in late 1994. But the taxpayers had won big in the early 1990s when Citron's risky bets were still paying off.The county calculated those"excess earnings"—the difference between what Citron earned and a prudent investor would have earned—at$1 billion.Merrill Lynch put the excess earnings at$1.5 billion. By the country's reckoning,its net loss was in the neighborhood of 5800 million to$900 million. Total settlements to date:$860million. Had the county taken the S&P case to trial,Brady said,"we could end up not getting any more than we got already." http://www.ocregister.com/news/oclitO l 6w.shtml 6/16199 Taylor must approve the S&P settlement before the county can begin dividing the$830 million pot among 200 local agencies.The agencies already have split about$30 million that Merrill Lynch paid in 1997 to settle a civil complaint by the Orange County district attorney. Former state Treasurer Thomas Hayes,who directed the county's legal strategy,will collect$9.9 million for his effort.When the county and other local agencies hired him three years ago,they agreed to pay him 1.5 percent of any settlements orjudgments after the first$200 million. County Executive Officer Jan Mitten neier and she hoped"that Standard &Poor's will be able to put this litigation behind them and take a more objective look at our bond rating."S&P is the only major bond-rating agency that has not restored the county s coveted investment-grade rating. Vittor said that before S&P rates another Orange County bond it will require the county to declare, in writing,that S&P's ratings are protected by the First Amendment. l newspaper in uninge county.caliromia lfteyis6er Copwigat teas me 0uzWe count'apiemr Please send..mends 10 aveo alen@Imkeeeapm ram hmp://www.ocregister.com/news/oclitO l 6w.shtml 6116/99 11 w / FRONT PAGE HELP.) Get the Force... Fn ay, une I , I 9 Y2K Test Sends Sewage Flowing Into Park,Street By MIGUEL BUSTH.LO,KARIMA A.HAYNES.PA TRICK MCGREEVY. Times Staff Writers 13 ailing concerns about the city's ability to handle the year 2000 computer problem,a test of the emergency system at a sanitation plant went awry Wednesday night,spilling about 4 million gallons of untreated sewage into part of the Sepulveda Dam Recreation Area before ADVERTIaEMEW officials could stop it. ® Officials t the San Fernando Valley plant had been testing a backup electricity system in anticipation of a possible Y2K power outage when they learned from a park ranger shortly after midnight that sewage was gushing from a maintenance hole in the 2,100-acre recreation area. City and commercial crews largely succeeded in corralling the stream of sewage flowing into the recreation area and kept it away from the Los Angeles River,a nearby golf course and a popular Japanese garden where r, i f two weddings are scheduled for this weekend. (/► Workers toiled through the night with high-powered vacuum cleaners to ,a , remove the waste from park grass.Street sweepers with water hoses cleared ti raw sewage from the street.As a precaution, 10 acres of Woodley Avenue �t4, Park,a grassy picnic area,were closed for the weekend. ■�, But health officials any the spill posed little danger to the public.The ,. bacteria from any remaining sewage will be burned off by the sun's •*�rj`� ultraviolet reys,experts say. "If there is skin contact,generally the worst that could happen isjust a rash,"said lack Petralia,director of the county Bureau of Environmental Protection. "We brought some sppecialists out who said the best thing we can do is let the sun bum off all of Ne bacteria,"said Steve Soboroff,president of the city Parks Commission. Meanwhile,the odor"wasn't pleasant,that's for sure,"said Caroline Piligm,who lives in Van Nuys,across the freeway from the treatment plant. The smell,she said,lingered into Thursday night. The spill occurred when a gate controlling the transfer of sewage from a large pipeline was mistakenly closed during the test,backing up sewage to street level for about two hours.Officials traced the malfunction to a programmer's error made in 1985. Judy Wilson,director of the city Sanitation Bureau,said she has ordered a review of the computer programs for all gates in the city sewer system. City officials said the problem can be fixed quickly and should not present a threat when computer clocks strike 12 a.m.Jan. 1. "I have every confidence that once we figure out what the logic problem is with this gate,we can fix it very easily,"Wilson said."It just underscores the importance of doing real-time testing rather than tabletop exercises." Mayor Richard Riordan also gave assurances that the problems will be addressed.Los Angeles has been testing Y2K readiness for two years and has experienced some minor glitches. "I have instructed the bureau to thoroughly investigate the circumstances so that when they conduct future tests we can avoid repeating similar occurrences,"Riordan said."Overall,the city is confident that its critical systems will be ready and operational for Y2K rollover,and we are continuing our contingency plans." The Y2K problem stems from the use of two digits to represent years in computer programming.In 2000,computer systems could became confused over the date"00,"which could be read as either 1900 or 2000,resulting in malfunctions or miscalculations. http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/FRONT/t000054865.htm1 6118/99 The sewage spill,which the city estimates will cost less than$100,000 to clean up,has worried some environmental groups. Mark Gold of Heal the Bay,a Santa Monica envronmental group,said he has talked with the city about fears over trouble at the massive Hyperion sewage treatment plant.A malfunction there could dump sewage into Santa Monica Bay. Gold said the spill at the much-smaller Donald C.Tillman Water Reclamation Plant,which treats about 65 million gallons of sewage a day, is a sign that the city's preparations may not be well planned. Officials at Tillman had not placed any monitors at the surface during the testing,not was there any electronic warning that the gate malfunctioned. "So you're doing this test at midnight and you don't have people on the surface?"Gold said. "That doesn't sound like good planning to me.There definitely is a lot of concern,because of the complex,technical nature of these plants.A lot can go wrong." Curtis Paxton,the planes assistant manager,said no one was assigned to monitor the park,checking for spills,because"we hadn't had any trouble before." John Norton,the official in charge of enforcement and compliance issues for the Some Water Resources Control Board,said the Tdiman spill was the first Y2K failure among waste-water punts in California.State water officials have the power to fine local agencies and arc monitoring Y2K compliance by sewage treatment plants in hopes of avoiding spills next year. "That's one of the things that the state[Environmental Protection Agency]and the state water board are concerned about,"Norton said. "We want them to test for Y2K,but also to be very cautious about doing so. We don't want to create problems;we want to solve them." Word of the sewage spill spread quickly through the community of expert consultants on the Y2K computer glitch. As private companies and government agencies test their computers for potential problems,experts say,some are getting more than they bargained for.At the Peach Bottom nuclear power pplant in Pennsylvania,for instance, computers crashed for seven hours in Febmary during Y2K testing.In Perth,Australia,large los&of chemicals were mistakenly dumped into the water during a Y2K test. "The good news is that they're actually out there looking at all the angles,and they're actually finding roblems prior to Y2K,"said Rich Cowles,a consultant for the state of califamia as well as private corporations."The bad news is that it shows problems exist." Kevin Corcoran,the project manager for Los Angeles'year 2000 program,said 134 of the city's 147 major computer systems are in compliance and the rest will meet that goal by Sept 30.Corcoran said those systems do not include smaller computer networks. The spill at Tillman began during testing for an electric power outage— one of the possible troubles that could result from the Y2K bug. At 9:40 p.m.city Department of Water and Power crews shut off electricity to the plant,and operators turned on emergency diesel-powered generators,Paxton said. The master computer went off for a few minutes during the transition from city electricity to generator power.When the computer came back,it sent a"fail/close"message between 9:45 p.m.and 10 p.m.to an underground gate that controls the flow of raw sewage. The mistaken closure caused row sewage to back up in an 8-foot- diameter pipe called the Additional Valley Outfall Relief Sewer.The computer controlling the gate did not notify plant workers that it had closed. The city park ranger notified plant operators,who went to the park, found the backup and at 12:15 a.m.redirected the flow,Paxton said.Plant officials then ordered the cleanup. Paxton blamed the mishap on a glitch in the computer program that had been in the system since the plant opened in 1985.It had never been detected during previous tests or power failures. By coincidence,Woodley Avenue Park had been among the sites the city considered for an official millennium celebration for 100,000 people on New Yeats Eve. Times staff writers Agnes Diggs,Irene Garcia,Annette Kondo,Hilary http:/Aw .latitnes.coni/HOMEINEWS/FRONT/t000054865.htmi 6/19/99 MacGregor and Martha L. Willman contributed to this story. San Fernando Valley Sewage Spill Four million gallons of raw sewage spilled into Woodley Avenue Park in the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area late Wednesday night after a computer malfunction at the adjacent Donald C.Tillman Water Reclamation Plant.Officials at the plant had been conducting tests of a backup power system in preparation for the year 2000 earn user problem when a gate to a major sewer pipe closed without warning because of a programming error. +Coovrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights ReservedO Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: LOS ANG_ELES BUREAU OF SANITATION,ENVIRONMENT—LOS ANGEL S,SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS,EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS. W TESTS,MISTAKES, EWAS GE SPILLS,EQUIPMENT FAILURE,nM only DAM RECREAT�N AREA.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. .. 81N8 y GO IE n..eX. 7— GO http://www.latimes.com/liOMEINEWS/FRONT/1000054865.hml 6/18/99 ___ _ .._ _._. . . ..... ..... .........� rage i of News p Site Index -0 • 1 ORANGE COUNTY" NEWS Saturday, June 19, 1999 How's the Water? Find Out Weekly ■ Beach Reports Begin, Assigning Grades for Contamination. Quality's Excellent in Most Places,Flunks in a Few By DAVID REYES, Times StaJfWriter ost of Orange County's beaches get top ratings for water RELATED _. .._ quality, but a number of critical places, particularly off Seal Beach, have high levels of bacteria, according to the O.C.SECTIONS environmental group Heal the Bay. MAIN PAGE In the first of its planned weekly reports on beach water conditions Friday, Heal the Bay also gave failing grades to the NEWS BY water--but only after measurable rainfall--at South County's COMMUNITY Doheny State Beach and several river mouths and storm drain sites. SPORTS Among beaches receiving high grades for low levels of PREP SPORTS pollution were those in San Clemente, Laguna Beach and Newport Beach at 38th Street. BUSINESS "For the most part, Orange County did well with 90% of its beaches getting good marks in dry weather," said Mark Gold, SO CAL LIVING the group's executive director. CALENDAR The advocacy group uses county health figures for coliform and other bacteria and converts them into simple letter grades CALENDAR from A to F, with lower grades indicating high amounts of fecal WEEKEND bacteria and a high risk of contracting illness. HOME DESIGN Typically, information supplied by the county Health Care Agency is technical and makes no sense to the average beach COMMENTARY user, Gold said. "We get information in raw data form, and it tells you total T.V. TMES coliform was 800 and fecal count was 200," he said. "But what is that going to mean to John Q. Public? Well, based on our experience, we take that information and basically translate it to what the public can understand." The simplified version, the first to include a pollution report ADVERTISEMENT card for the county's 42-mile coast, is designed to offer a quick glimpse each Friday at beach conditions. The group has provided similar report cards for the past nine years on Los Angeles County beaches. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/OP,ANGF/t000055163,htn l 6/19/1999 ..".�.. ...... ..... .. ....y rage t or j , For years, Orange County surfers and swimmers have complained about swimming in beaches polluted by river and extCard W+SA storm drain runoff. Those areas have high amounts of fecal coliform, which is an indicator of sewage and filth. Online Balance In the case of Seal Beach, the water is severely affected by Transfers. San Gabriel River runoff, the advocacy group reported. 2.9% intro APR. Seal Beach Lifeguard Lt. Ross Pounds said the low grade "doesn'tsurprise me." But he liked hearing about the grade. "I applaud Heal the Bay's efforts,"Pounds said, "especially for me as someone who works year-round in these waters." The findings echo the warnings that health officials in Orange and Los Angeles counties have issued in recent years: Avoid swimming at beaches near storm drains, channels and rivers, roughly 100 yards from the mouth. Studies have emphasized that the advice applies even during dry weather. The grades come as county health officials fight additional testing required by state law and as the county's largest sanitation district reveals that waste discharged into the ocean will likely increase 17%and that the water will get dirtier. In April, health officials in Orange and San Diego counties blocked standardized testing for ocean pollution at California's beaches. O6cials said they were not convinced that more stringent standards were necessary to protect the public's health. A testing program was supposed to begin by April 1, but the dispute held up even agreement on what the regulations should be.Regulations have yet to be submitted for final approval, said Jack S. McGurk, environmental management chief at the state Department of Health Services. Larry W. Honeyboume, program chief of Orange County's Water Quality Section, could not be reached Friday. Meanwhile, the Orange County Sanitation District, which serves 2.2 million customers, has proposed an increase in the amount of waste discharged into the ocean to keep pace with the expected population rise, said Linda Tuchman, a district spokeswoman. The district discharges 17,000 metric tons of waste water a year and has proposed to raise that figure to 20,000 metric tons, a level already allowed under the district's federal permit. An environmental impact report on the proposal is done but must be approved by the district's board before it can be publicly released, Tuchman said. The earliest release date is June 29, she said. Gold said the weekly tests will be available year-round on his group's Web site(www.healthebay. org/baymap). With Friday's addition of Orange County beaches, the environmental group has more than 250 monitoring sites along the coast, from San Clemente to Santa Barbara County. "The beach report card," Gold said, "provides essential information to protecting the public health of more than 100 http://www.latiuses.com/HOMB/NEWS/OPANGE/t000055163.htmi 6/19/1999 ..v..n .uc 1.atn: rtuu Uut vreexry Page 3 of 3 million annual visitors to Southern California beaches." rR • Sample Water Readings Bacteria levels in water off Seal Beach and Doheny State Beach were ranked among the unhealthiest by Heal the Bay, an environmental group. In general, most county beaches received A+grades during dry weather, but dropped near rivers and storm drains, especially after rain washed bacteria and debris into the ocean. Here is a sample of sites graded during dry and wet weather: R_f Dry Wet Seal Beach at First Street: F F at Eighth Street: D F Sunset Beach at 14th Street: A+F at Broadway: A+ A+ Huntington Beach at Bolsa Chica: A+C Huntington Beach at Bluffs: A+ A+Huntington Beach State Beach at Jack's snack bar: A A Santa Ana River Jetty: A+F Newport Beach at 38th Street: A+A+Corona del Mar: A+A+Crystal Cove State Park at Pelican Point: A+A+ Salt Creek: A+A+Laguna Beach at Main Beach: A+A+Doheny State Beach at North Beach: C A+Doherty State Beach south of San Juan Creek F F San Clemente at lifeguard building: A+ A+ For a complete list, see Web site: http7//www.healthebay.org/baym NOTE: Grades are based on water samples, taken by city and county health officials between May 14 and June 10, that measure levels of three bacteria: total coliform, fecal coliform and enterococcus. High levels of these bacteria indicate that other bacteria, such as e. coli, are present in large enough quantities to present a health risk. The grade does not include measuring for toxins or trash. Source: Heal the Bay Cwyfi t 1999 Los Angeles Times. An Rights Reserved d Search the archives of the Los Angel.Times for similar stories about: ENVIRONNMNT—ORANGE COUNTY,OCEAN POLLUTION BEACHES,STATISTICS.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ews " Go Sne Index O http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINFWS/ORANGE/t000055163.html 6/19/1999 TelegramSOW CALIFORNIA Business/Labor/Water Leaders Coalition PROMOTMG INVESTb1FTT EV C1LUVP,VL4'S WATER F'UTVRE Agricdm id Council ofCalifomia Jog 25, 1999 Amooabm of California Water Agencies a"Area Council Statement ofBusiness Labor- Altriculture and Water Leaders Celifomie Budding Iadavtry Amidac ion On CALFED D Rel ere: _— Califomid Business Pmperow Association The carrem crisis in Delta Pumping operations underscam the vital California Chamber oft..,,monvo, necessity of CALFED moving forward more aggressively to resolve the Calif®a Council fo<Faoirmoffital and water Supply,water quality and environmental conflicts in the Delta The Economic Belarca fact that Sao Joaquin Valley growers and Silicon Valley industry are facing California.Fa®Borman Federation water shortages and water quality impacts—drought-Ue conditions during Cahfomia Manufacturers Association a fifth consecutive wet year—is unacceptable. In addition,due to the current pumping restrictions,all Calidbrina water users who depend on the California state Council of laborers Delta now share the risk of reduced waterS Plies next Year. rma of Central Valley Project water Associdtim the weather. Coming Water District California's water system is overburdened and needs ®provemenLs. Friant Water Users Authority Rem County water Agency CALFED must take this opportunity to translate this draft doci man Ion Angela Arm Chamba of n,,,,,,erce into immediate actions that will avert such crises in the short-term, and Mmop h m water District of southern provide long-term assurances that California's water supply and water California quality needs will be met along with eaviro®emal improvements. Equally Mountain Counties Water Raomces Associati® vital will be mustering the political leadership necessary to make decisions Municipal water District of Orange County and implement solutions. North Delia water Agency In light of recent evems,the participating federal agencies in CALFED Orange County Blism Council must make credible conmti man to meeting the needs of all water interests San Diego County water Authority and work within a cooperative and proactive framework as untended by the Bay-Delia Accord,rather es than relying on rigid regulatory approach to water AQuthorityyu Exchange Contractors problems in the Deter. Sao Lute a:Deht Mcndom Water Anthony . Water supplies for cities and farmers must be increased by at lean Santa Clara Volley water Diaoia 200,000 acre-feet within the fast few years of the CALFED program., South®California water Committee and by 400,000 acte-feet by the end of Stage 1. State water Contractors . CALFED must move forward to implement measures that will improve St.eliton East water District fisheries and protect the®viro®rffi while improving water quality and Tohama Colum Canal Authority water supply. Tulare Late Basin water Storage District . CALFED must move forward during the year 2000 on the South Delta coat®Growers Association improvements that will increase both the water supply and reliability for wetlands water District Delta-dependent water users. Wheeler Ridge-Mancaps Water Storage District 3500 Porsche Way a Suite 201 •Ontario,California 91764 MORE 909-980-4700 Fair: 909-980-2628 I • CALFED must identify suitable locations for additional off-mean water storage,and pursue their development. • CALFED must implement viable groundwater storage and conjunctive use projects to increase the available water supply in the near-term. • CALFED must dement programs to improve the quality of Delta source waters without reducing the available water supply. Nearly five years after signing the Bay-Delta Accord, and four years into its comprehensive planning process for a Delta solution,there is no reason for further delay. We know the problems and we understand the solutions. It's tune to begin implementing them. s J Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING JUNE 23, 1999 oJNt, ANlTgr� cL of N Q � O y 1�N4 TH EN��R ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on June 23, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson A Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo X John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans A Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager; Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Petemtan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Jim Herberg; Doug Stewart; Mike White; Jean Tappan; Jim Mullins; John Linder OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Michael Moms; Kris Lindstrom; Tom Dawes; Brett Barbra; Gerald Nichols; Art Newsham; Susan Whittaker, Steve Shelton; Mark Dace; Barbara Templeton; Art Perry; Terry Lane; Tony Henrich; E. LaBahn; Richard Corneille Minutes for Board Meeting O6/23/99 Page 3 ELECTION OF CHAIR The General Counsel briefly reviewed the provisions of the District's Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Chair and Vice Chair. Nominations were then called for the post of Chair, whereupon Director Jan Debay was then nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Jan Debay as the Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR It was announced that the election of the Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District was in order. Nominations were then called for the post, whereupon Director Peer A. Swan was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Peer A. Swan as the Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Chair Debay appointed Director John Collins as the Chair pro tem upon her leaving the meeting for personal obligations. PUBLIC COMMENTS Gerald Nichols spoke to the Directors on behalf of his neighbors and himself regarding a request for waiver of sewer connection fees, and the District's denial of said request. He was concerned that they had been paying sewer user fees for approximately ten years even though they are not connected to the system. He stated that the District continued to assess the user fees even though the District knew no connection existed for many property owners throughout Orange County. Director Gullixson then requested that this matter be agendized for the July 14, 1999 FAHR Committee Meeting and the July 21, 1999 Board Meeting with a report from staff on this item. Brett Barbra, a Director of the Yorba Linda Water District, was then recognized who spoke in support of the District's proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09, and more equitable rates of establishing sewer service charges. REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair urged all Directors to attend the District's Legislators' Day on June 250. Discussion items will include water issues in California and Orange County's role; Orange County growth projections and infrastructure needs; the District's strategic planning efforts through 2020; update on Santa Ana River watershed activities; and the Groundwater Replenishment System. Chair Debay then reported that a public hearing on the revised capital facilities capacity charge ordinance was scheduled for the July 21, 1999 regular board meeting at 7:00 p.m. A public hearing is also required by CEOA on the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report, and the Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 n Page 4 Finance Committee suggested that it be held the same evening to avoid holding a separate, special meeting on the EIR. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) That the regular board meeting on July 21, 1999 be held at 6:30 p.m. in order to conduct regular business; (2) hold the capital facilities capacity charge ordinance public hearing at 7:00 p.m.; and (3) hold the public hearing for the Strategic Plan EIR at 8:00 p.m. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager announced that the District has received for the third year in a row the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA)for the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for 1998-99. Mr. McIntyre then presented the award to the District's Controller, Mike White. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 26, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Shea abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 05/15/99 05/31/99 Totals $3,685,956.85 $4,154,668.05 Directors Leyes, Shea and Walker abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR 10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-07, selecting the annual change in California per Capital Personal Income as the cost-of- living adjustment factor, and establishing $50,026,000 as the annual GANN Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1999-00 for the Orange County Sanitation District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 5 11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-08, Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures made in advance for 1999-00 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Term Financing. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 13. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the June 23, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 26, 1999 to be filed. 14. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan, re the May 27, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on May 27, 1999 to be filed. 15. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the June 2, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held June 2, 1999 to be filed, as corrected. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley for the provision of vehicle fueling services; and authorize the General Manager to execute on behalf of the District. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Phase 3 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc.for$218,500 for the period July 1999 to February 2000. 16. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the June 3, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held June 3, 1999 to be filed, as corrected. Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 6 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Mod cations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$326,366 and 328 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$14,027,424; (2)Approve a budget amendment of $1,112,258 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of $21,118,358; (3) Accept Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System - Modifications at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-38.5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Moderations at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12,with Mike Priich&Sons authorizing an addition of$115,000 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,392,796. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, providing for additional construction support services in the amount of $37,502, for a total amount not to exceed $375,056. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Converse Consultants, law/Crandall, and Ninyo &Moore, providing for geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment and materials testing services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-182, for an amount not to exceed$150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extensions ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with DGA Consultants, Inc., Bush & Associates, Inc., and Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc., providing for surveying services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-183,for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extensions ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 7 ' In. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers; Krieger&Stewart, Inc.; Lee& Ro, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc.; and Tran Consulting Engineers, for professional engineering services related to (small projects)for Facilities Engineering Consulting Services for an amount not to exceed $160,000 each, for a total of$800,000. 17. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the June 9, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held June 9, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of May 1999. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file 1999/00 Strategic Goals Workplans. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period June 25, 1999 to May 15, 2000, in an amount not to exceed$890,250. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-186) to the following support staffing firths for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agencv • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems- IT Personnel • Lab Support- Laboratory personnel 2)Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firths, as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. Minutes for Board Meeting O6/23/99 o Page 8 g. A discussion was entered into by and among all Directors regarding the establishment of sanitary service charges for all revenue areas for fiscal year 1999.00. A substitute motion was made and seconded to establish sewer service fees within Revenue Area 1 at the rate of$108.59 per year. The motion failed by a vote of 8 ayes and 12 nayes. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-09, Approving a Report on Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Establishing the Amount of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for All Revenue - Areas for Fiscal Year 1999410; and Directing the County Auditor to Add Such Charges to the 1999-00 Secured Tax Roll. The motion was approved by a vote of 13 ayes and 7 nays. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Receive and file letter dated May 12, 1999 from Legacy Partners, requesting a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels paid in December 1998 and January 1999, and a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for two parcels to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates, in the amount of$183,896.00; 2) Deny request for partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels/permits paid in December 1998 and January 1999; and, 3)Approve request to grant fee reduction for two parcels/permits to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve proposed Operating, Capital, DebtlCOP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 1999-00, as follows: Joint Works OperatingNVorking Capital $44,000,000 Worker's Compensation Self-Insurance 330,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 792,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 68,771,000 Collection System Operating 9,356,500 Collection System Capital Improvement 23,629,000 Debt/COP Service 41,690,000 j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve in concept Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations re contents of Resolution No. OCSD 99-_; and, 3) Return to the Board for final adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 99- with any recommended modifications at the regular meeting of July 21, 1999. Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 9 ° 18. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins re the June 16, 1999 and June 21, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held May 25, 1999 to be filed. C. Directors entered into a discussion regarding the governance and economic impacts of the Groundwater Replenishment System. A motion was then made to refer the item to the PDC Committee and FAH Committee for governance and finance issues. A straw vote was taken on whether to vote on the original motion tonight without further discussion. The vote was 13 ayes and 7 nays. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for engineering services for the Project Development phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed$4,810,300,with Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)and Orange County Water District(OCWD) having equal shares in the amount of$2,405,150;2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Separation Processes, Inc.,for engineering services in connection with Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed$403,280, with the OCSD and OCWD having equal shares in the amount of$201,640; and, 3)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cad R. Nelson for professional services in connection with Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $53,000, with OCSD and OCWD having equal shares in the amount of$26,500. It was further moved to have the governance issues and financial issues be referred to the Steering Committee, PDC Committee and FAHR Committee for further discussion. The motion passed with 13 aye votes and 6 nay votes. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Chair pro lem Collins appointed Director Tom Saltarelli to assume the Chair pro tem for the balance of the meeting. 19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Authorize circulation of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan for public comment in compliance with CEQA requirements; 2)Authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; 3) Fix July 21. 1999 at 8:00 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office, as the dale, time and place for public hearing on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; and, 4) Establish August 16, 1999 as the final date for which all Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 10 comments must be received on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan. 20. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve plans and specifications for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to Matthew and Stewart Co., Ina for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, for an amount not to exceed$129,796. 21. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Southern Contracting Company,for an amount not to exceed $1,290,000. 22. Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and File Staff Report MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ordinance No. OCSD-09 was read by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-09, and pass to second reading and public hearing on July 21, 1999. 23. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No.OCSD 99-10, Temporarily Suspending the Provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-04 re Capital Facilities Connection Charges. Director Ferryman opposed. 24. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-11, Directing the County Tax Collector to Include Sanitary Sewer Service Charges on the 1999-00 Property Tax Bills and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-36. 25. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos. 25(a)(1), (2) and (3). General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), upon a two-thirds'vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE: That the matter of claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership be added to the agenda as Item No. 25(a)(4), for discussion. Minutes for Board Meeting 06/23/99 Page 11 ° CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 9:06 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54955.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time the action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 25(a)(2). No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 25(a)(1), (3) and (4). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:52 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:52 p.m. n Secretary o(t a Board of irectors of Co un Orange y Sanitatio District HAwp.dla\agenda%3wrd Mlnulea\l 999 Board Minulw\W2399.dm Claims Paid From 511199 to 6116/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 19316 National Plant Services,Inc. $ 128,026.25 Vacuum Truck Services 19317 Orange County Sanitation District 405,226.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 19318 Southern California Edison 48,492.89 Power 19319 Voided Check - - 19320 Ponton Industries 13,946.57 Instrument Parts&Supplies 19321 Voided Check - 19322 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 19323 BNI Building News 1,920.00 Registration 19324 Career Track Seminars MS2 79.00 Seminar Registration 19325 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registration 19326 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 19327 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,016.50 Electrical Supplies 19328 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 15.65 Plumbing Supplies 19329 Cooper Energy Services 3,000.00 Registration 19330 County Wholesale Electric Co. 902.05 Electrical Supplies 19331 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 19332 CWEA Annual Conference 115.00 Conference Registration y 19333 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment a 19334 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment :- 19335 Freight Masters 41.10 Freight 19336 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 19337 GTE California 59.64 Telephone Services 19338 Home Depot 55.00 Small Hardware 19339 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 19340 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 77.17 Safety Supplies 19341 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 517.44 Safety Supplies 19342 Lessons in Leadership 11.063.00 Registration 19343 Maintenance Technology Corp. 694.86 Welding Supplies 19344 Matt Chlor, Inc. 2,610.61 Valves 19345 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 882.81 Plumbing Supplies 19346 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 579.83 Tools 19347 Motion Industries 55.14 Pump Supplies 19348 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association 50.00 Membership 19349 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 19350 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19351 OCB Reprographics 81.84 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19352 OCEA 615.07 Dues Deduction 19353 Pacific Bell 18.35 Telephone Services 19354 Court Order 40.00 Wage Gamishment Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 5116/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19355 Court Ord" 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19356 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 19357 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 400.31 Tools/Hardware 19358 ThirdWave 19.656.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project 19359 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 411.31 Mechanical Supplies 19360 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 19361 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,719.00 Lab Supplies 19362 Nicholas J.Amontes 133.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19363 Barclays Bank PLC 87.710.85 COP Letter of Credit 19364 RPIBio Gro 78.651.15 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 19365 Bristol Systems,Inc. 27,255.33 Consulting Services-V2K Project 19366 Brown&Caldwell 151.000.87 Engineering Services Pl-37&J-35-1 19367 Carollo Engineers 113,320.04 Engineering Services P7-36-2,J-25-4&J-39 19368 Finnigan MAT Western Region 59,882.06 Lab Instrument-Gas Chromatograph 19369 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 42.512.83 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19370 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 125,185.84 Engineering Services J-42 19371 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 96,282A2 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 19372 Third Wave 36.930.17 Professional Services-Document Management Project ro '-' 19373 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 99,450.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 H y 19374 Ark Construction Company 82,873.28 Construction Pi-444 r!, 19375 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 29.497.95 Construction P2-65 19376 Southern Contracting Company 31.458.00 Construction P2-47-1 19377 Vortex Industries, Inc. 516.00 Door Repair 19378 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,963.31 Long Distance Telephone Services 19379 AccuStandard, Inc. 73.25 Lab Supplies 19380 Advanced Cooling Technologies 850.00 Electrical Service 19381 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 1.535.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19382 Aidco Systems, Inc. 4.374.60 Electrical Supplies 19393 Air-Weigh 62.19 Publication 19384 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 19385 Airgas Lyons Safety 635.08 Safety Supplies 19386 All American Asphalt 9,364.52 Street Repair-Baker St.&Arroyo Ave. 19387 American Compensation Assoc. 160.00 Membership 19388 American Management Association Int'I. 159.00 Registration 19389 American National Standards Institute 116.00 Safety Supplies 19390 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 330.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 19391 Apex Training&Development 119.95 Publication 19392 Appleone Employment Service 2.742.67 Temporary Employment Services 19393 Applied Industrial Technology 1.752.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19394 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 617.00 Vacuum Truck Services Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 5115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19474 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 1,569.75 Software Licenses 19475 City of Huntington Beach 14,477.93 Water Use 19476 HR Solutions, Inc. 742.75 Human Resources Participation Survey 19477 Imaging Plus, Inc. 16,359.57 (1)HP large Format Printer with Accessories 19478 StateNet 165.00 Online Service 19479 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 3.45 Truck Supplies 19480 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 19481 ISCO C/O MRC Technology 4,633.25 20 Sampler Batteries 19482 Island Press 40.61 Ceiling Tile 19483 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 19484 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 465.39 Safety Supplies 19485 J&B Auto Parts 386.93 Auto Parts&Supplies 19486 James Martin&Co. 15,65&00 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 19487 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 2,026.47 Misc. Construction Services 19488 Jay's Catering 1,054.20 Catering Services 19489 Jobtrak 90.00 Notices&Ads �x 19490 Johnstone Supply 1,014.48 Electrical Supplies 19491 K.P. Lindstrom 8.182.92 Envir. Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 y 19492 Kelly Paper 49.89 Paper y 19493 Industrial Distribution Group 214.76 Tools N 19494 Krieger&Stewart, Inc. 6.492.00 Professional Services Pl-64 19495 KADY International 2,500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental 19496 Lab Support 5,492.81 Temporary Employment Services 19497 Labware, Inc. 4,000.00 Registration 19498 LaserAll Corporation 910.73 Service Agreement 19499 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Books&Publications 19500 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 534.00 Architectural Services 19501 Los Angeles Freightliner 363.94 Meter 19502 Mar Vac Electronics 23.32 Instrument Supplies 19503 Marcy Rothenberg 1,485.00 Professional Services-Writer for the Internet Project 19504 Marinovich Trawl Co., Inc. 1,650.00 Trawl Net 19505 Masune Company 67.65 Safety Supplies 19506 MasTec Network Services 4,953.62 Electrial Supplies 19507 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 9,190.86 Tools 19508 Mee Analytical System 650.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 19509 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10,800.00 Mechanical Repairs 19510 Mission Uniform Service 3,153.08 Uniform Rentals 19511 Motion Industries 167.21 Pump Supplies 19512 MotoPholo 83.95 Photographic Services 19613 MPS Photographic Services 1,218.89 Photographic Services Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 5/1199 to 6115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19514 National Mlcrocomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 19515 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 19516 City of Newport Beach 36.61 Water Use 19517 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 12,094.79 LubricantlDiesel Fuel 19518 NAS Associates, Inc. 1.131.75 Lab Services 19519 NARC Register 275.00 Registration 19520 Network Solutions Group 2,970.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 19521 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,780.71 Office Supplies 19522 Interior Resources and/or Off Pavilion 560.00 Office Furniture 19523 Olsson Construction, Inc. 5,650.00 Construction P2-55 19524 Oracle Corporation-Support/Sales 2,692.69 Software 19525 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 558.92 Electrical Supplies 19526 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,049.51 Fittings 19527 Oxygen Service Company 1,333.71 Specialty Gases 19528 OCB Reprographics 104.95 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19529 OCCABA 45.00 Membership-Orange County Compensation& Benefits Assoc. 19530 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 333.72 Electrical Supplies 19531 Pacific Mechanical Supply 98.55 Plumbing Supplies H 19532 Panametncs 10,878.92 Meter y 19533 Parker Motion 8 Controls Sales 370.98 Mechanical Supplies a, 19534 Pads Unlimited 168.21 Truck Supplies 19535 Penman&Duncan 5,230.16 Legal Services-OCSD No. 3 vs. United Technologies 19536 Petco Animal Supplies 332.91 Lab Supplies 19537 Pickard Design 2,867.66 Publication-Central Power Generation Brochure 19538 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 19,828.48 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 19539 Pinkerton Systems Integration 4,727.70 Secunty Card Reader System 19540 Polydyne, Inc. 12,121.32 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19541 Power Pumps, Inc. 76.13 Pump Supplies 19542 PC Expanders 5,573.00 Document Scanner 19543 Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. 498.02 Lab Supplies 19544 Red Nang Shoes 233.61 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 19545 Regents of University of Calif. 145.00 Registration 19546 Remedy 3,542.66 Temporary Employment Services 119547 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 844.59 Motor Repairs 19548 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 4.499.51 Basket Strainers for Polymer Use 19549 RPM Electric Motors 2.058.90 Electric Motor Repair 19550 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 655.49 Paint Supplies 19551 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 260.50 Mechanical Supplies 19552 Second-Sun 360.08 Light Fixtures 19553 Sentex Systems, Inc. 5,963.52 Instrument Maint. Services Page 6 of 8 ' Claims Paid From 611199 to 6f15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19654 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 2.257.12 Tools 19555 Shasta Electric LP 659.36 Construction Services-Security Gate Arm Foundation Improvement 19556 Shureluck Sales&Engineenng 504.39 ToolslHardware 19557 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 19,493.82 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19558 Snap-On Technical Training 816.00 Registration 19559 Southern California Edison 6,049.18 Power 19560 Southern California Water 128.84 Water Use 19561 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 19562 Summit Steel 53.37 Metal 19563 Sunset Ford 487.54 Truck Supplies 19564 Textile Engineering Associates 6,875.90 Valves 19565 The Mernwood Corporation 8,703.71 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 19566 The Register 1.339.20 Notices&Ads 19567 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,154.11 Mechanical Supplies 19568 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 19569 Tongs Lock&Safe Service&Sales 139.78 Locks&Keys 19570 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 162.70 Truck Supplies 19571 Teksystems 12,000.00 Temporary Employment Services '+ 19572 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters N y 19573 U.S. Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 19574 Unocal Corporation 25.89 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 19575 Valley Cities Supply Company 822.00 Plumbing Supplies 19576 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 97.62 Electrical Supplies 19577 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 10.880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 19578 Veme's Plumbing 385.00 Plumbing Supplies 19579 Village Nurseries 82.30 Landscaping Supplies 19580 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 21,298.82 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 19581 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 3,388.59 Lab Supplies 19582 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,083.04 Security Guards 19583 Waxie Sanitary Supply 714.71 Janitorial Supplies 19584 West Group 285.64 Subscription 19585 Western States Chemical, Inc. 15,742.48 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 19586 Whessoe Varec Go Pacific Process Equip. 5.361.85 Valves 19587 Will Scientific 1,392.61 Lab Supplies 19588 Wyatt Data Services 658.00 Publication 19589 Xerox Corporation 12,962.04 Copier Leases 19590 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 99.16 Office Supplies 19591 Yeats Appliance Dolly Mfg 17.51 Mechanical Supplies 19592 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 599.03 Training Expense Reimb. - 19593 Layne T.Baroldi 245.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19594 Mark Castillo 144.00 Training Expense 19595 Chloe D. Dec 110.60 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19596 Michael D. Moore 298.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19597 Moire E.Sullivan 242.62 Training Expense Reimb. 19598 John W.Swindler 176.00 Meeting Expense 19599 Karen A.Tumbaugh 560.52 Employee Computer Loan Program 19600 County of Orange 405.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19601 Orange County Sanitation District 11,750.61 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 19602 Orange County Sanitation District 1,389.17 Petty Cash Reimb. 19603 Vortex Industries, Inc. 44,231.27 Fiberglass Doors Installation Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,358,877.72 Payroll Disbursements 13825-13957 Employee Paychecks $ 167.991.87 Biweekly Payroll 5/5199 13958-13958 Employee Paycheck 5,367.40 Termination 37306-37746 Direct Deposit Statements 630,743.52 Biweekly Payroll 5/5/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 804.102.79 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 151,691.57 May Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 202.864.14 May Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits m State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. $ 168,420.63 May Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 522,976.34 H a � Total Claims Paid 511199-511519 9 $ 3,685,956.85 Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 5116/99 to 5/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 19604 Orange County Sanitation District $ 396.021.94 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 19605 Southern California Edison 44,974.57 Power 19606 SAWPA 35,000.00 Nitrogen&Total Dissolved Solids Task Force 19607 Abesco 1,006.16 Hardware 19608 Alaska Sea Grant Program 70.00 Publication 19609 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 308.92 Mechanical Supplies 19610 American Society for Training&Development 139.00 Membership 19611 The Assoc.of Records Managers&Admin. 50.00 Membership 19612 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 19613 Builders Book, Inc. 378.86 Publication 19614 Buy.Com 34.09 Computer Supplies 19615 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registre0on 19616 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 19617 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 19618 CSMFO 80.00 Meeting Expense s 19619 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment m 19620 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment H 19621 GTE California 6.287.05 Telephone Services m 19622 Herb's Bladdorest Bakery&Deli 203.75 Catering Services �- 19623 Information Resources 250.00 Personnel Services 19624 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 19625 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 86.13 Safety Supplies 19626 Jay's Catering 53.67 Catering Services 19627 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 237.30 Safety Supplies 19628 Catherine W. Landis 55.59 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19629 Los Angeles Times 176.42 Notices&Ads 19630 Nor AM Productions,Inc. 395.00 Publication 19631 Orange County Family Support 761.50 Wage Garnishment 19632 Orange County Forum 160.00 Membership 19633 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19634 OCEA 596.57 Dues Deduction 19635 Pacific Bell 48.08 Telephone Services 19636 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 19637 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19638 Peace Officers Council of CA 619.00 Dues Deduction 19639 Remedy Temp 2,948.25 Temporary Employment Services 19640 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 5.499.53 Tools/Hardware 19641 Shannon,Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19642 So. Cal.Gas Company 14,407.29 Natural Gas Page 1 of 8 Claims Peal From 5116199 to 6131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amours Description 19843 Sun Healthcare Group 1.887.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund III United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 19645 Water Environment Federation 49.50 Publication 19646 Richard A. Castillon 690.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19647 James R. Davidson 347.64 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19648 Mike J. Herrera 1,227.54 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19649 Andrei loan 282.64 Training Expense Reimb. 19650 Robert Ooten 840.96 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19651 Ken A. Sakamoto 518.37 Training Expense Reimb. 19652 Yvonne L. Schwab 345.72 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19653 Robert J.Thiede 463.14 Training Expense Reimb. 19654 Michael I.Zedek 363.08 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19655 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design 12,500.00 Human Resources Service 19656 Bieck&Veatch L.L.P. 58,028.00 Engineering Services P1-46-2 19657 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 77,225.50 Engineering Services J- 0-3 19658 Carollo Engineers 64,363.76 Engineering Services P2-60 19659 Delta Dental 37,533.76 Dental Insurance Plan 19660 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 54.128.00 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 y 19661 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 30.982.10 Consulting Services-FIS Impl. &Support tr 19662 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 43.130.81 Construction Services-Lab Gas Line Rehab. i„ 19663 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 49,137.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19664 Lee&Ro, Inc. 26.280.61 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 19665 Voided Check - - 19666 Pacific Investment Management Co. 121.663.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 19667 Pacifiwre of Ca. 37.709.39 Health Insurance Premium 19668 Painewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 19669 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 156,603.83 Engineering Services J-42 19670 Pima Gm Systems, Inc. 28,322.02 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19671 Slemon, Larsen&Marsh 37.508.18 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19672 SPEC Services, Inc. 105.787.69 Engineering Services J-33-1 19673 United Healthcare 258,881.30 Medical Health Insurance 19674 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 46,594.60 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 19675 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 68,685.75 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 19876 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 125,487.90 Construction 5.41-1 19677 Mike Prlich&Sons 382,896.00 Construction 6-12 19678 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 45,481.88 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 19679 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 46,389.78 Engineering Services 2-40 19680 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 134,640.00 Construction 2-34R 19681 A-Plus Systems 2,387.28 Notices&Ads 19682 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1,250.00 Software Subscription Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19683 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 2,506.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19684 Aearo Company 2,424.00 Safety Supplies 19685 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 19686 Airborne Express 219.00 Air Freight 19687 Appleone Employment Service 8,564.35 Temporary Employment Services 19688 Applied Industrial Technology 597.65 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19689 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,130.00 Vacuum Truck Services 19690 Asbury Environmental Services 813.00 Waste Oil Removal 19691 Audio Video Supply, Inc. 345.27 Door Repair 19692 Awards&Trophies By Bea 882.81 Plaques 19693 ACIUGIES Workshop 25.00 Registration 19694 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson 395.00 Registration 19695 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Services 19696 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 28.41 Telephone Services 19697 AWSI 230.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 19698 Battery Specialties 247.39 Batteries 19699 Bongard Communications, Ltd. 116.00 Printing Service w 19700 Boot Bam 118.42 Reimbursable Safety Shoes H 19701 Bristol Systems, Inc. 22,767.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project ro 19702 Brown&Caldwell 3,667.15 Engineering Services Pt-37 19703 Burke Engineering Co. 1,862.16 Electrical Supplies 19704 Buy.Com 5,571.82 Computer Supplies 19705 BNI Building News 1,096.67 Publication 19706 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 19707 Cabot, Inc. 1.247.15 Valves 19708 Cad Warren&Co. 150.57 Insurance Claims Administrator 19709 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 197.24 Office Furniture 19710 Charles P.Crowley Co. 349.31 Instrument Parts 19711 Chemical Transfer Company, Inc. 59.00 Freight 19712 City of Fountain Valley 11,951.88 Water Use 19713 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registration 19714 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 57.77 Lab Supplies 19715 Compressor Components Of California 1.583.93 Pump Supplies 19716 Computers America, Inc. 12,622.89 Computer Supplies 19717 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1.233.50 Electrical Supplies 19718 Converse Consultants 627.70 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93 19719 Convey Development 340.00 Software Maint. 19720 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1.583.26 Engine Supplies 19721 Copalco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copper Lease 19722 Corporate Express 1,402.49 Office Supplies Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 5/16/99 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19723 Cost Containment Solutions 170.58 Workers Comp. Services 19724 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 375.89 Truck Parts 19725 Costco Wholesale Membership 35.00 Membership 19726 County of Orange 612.50 Permit Fees 19727 County of Orange 627.56 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19728 County Wholesale Electric Co. 510.52 Electrical Supplies 19729 CR 8 R,Inc. 2.835.00 Container Rentals 19730 Damon S.Williams Associates,L.L.C. 8.975.52 Professional Services-Benchmarking Study 19731 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 9,895.72 (1)Dell Computer Workstation, (1)HP Printer 817 Drives 19732 De2urik C/O Misco/South West 13,802.14 Valves 19733 Diamond H Recognition 323A2 Employee Service Awards 19734 Dover Elevator Company 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 19735 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 1,211.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 19736 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1.083.84 Paint Supplies 19737 DGA Consultants, Inc. 16,410.28 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 19738 E.V. Holt Construction 3,500.00 Auto Shop Engine Analyzer 19739 Employment Development Dept. 2,536.84 Reimbursable Unemployment Insurance N 19740 Enchanter, Inc. 6.300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 Hl 19741 Environmental Express 531.75 Lab Supplies t°f 19742 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 910.20 Lab Supplies c 19743 Executive Excellence 5,000.00 Human Resources Service 19744 ENS Resources, Inc. 8,381.38 Professional Services-Legislative 19745 Faxpress, Inc. 1.616.25 Office Supplies 19746 FedEx Corporation 217.66 Air Freight 19747 Fibertron 328.87 Fiber Optic Cable 19748 Filter Supply Company 8,111.34 Filters 19749 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 658.32 Lab Supplies 19750 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1.610.15 Pump Supplies 19751 Fluid Handling Systems 1.720.36 Internet Service 19752 Fountain Valley Camera 34.38 Photo Supplies 19753 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 122.84 Paint Supplies 19754 Franklin Covey 1,889.45 Office Supplies 19755 Fry's Electronics 250.87 Computer Supplies 19756 FLW Inc. 816.23 Electrical Supplies 19757 FLW Service Corp. South 209.72 Instrument Supplies 19758 G. E. Supply 5,819.36 Electric Parts 19759 Ganahl Lumber Company 29.32 Lumber/Hardware 19760 Gardner-Denver r10 Misco 81.02 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 19761 GanaB-Callahan Company 1,926.03 Chemicals Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 6/16199 to 6131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19762 GTE California 677.62 Telephone Services 19763 Goldenwest Window Service 1.798.00 Window Cleaning Service 19764 WWGrainger, Inc. 239.27 Compressor Supplies 19765 Graphic Distributors 89.22 Photographic Supplies 19766 Graseby STI 367.52 Engine Supplies 19767 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 147.40 Janitorial Supplies 19768 GBC(General Binding Corp) 996.69 Office Supplies 19769 Westmark Sales, Inc.IGLI International 762.00 Instrument Supplies 19770 Hacker Equipment Company 3,125.85 Truck Supplies 19771 Harbour Engineering Group 11,441.40 Pump Supplies 19772 Harold Primrose Ice 112.00 Ice 19773 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 168.28 Plumbing Supplies 19774 Harting 8 Associates 3,540.00 Professional Services-Process Control Software Standards 19775 Hatch 8 Kirk Inc. 985.00 Truck Supplies 19776 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 797.10 Catering Services 19777 Hilton, Famkopf 8 Hobson, L.L.C. 2,035.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 19778 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,009.36 Maint.Services-Sewer Cleaning pr 19779 Home Depot 165.98 Small Hardware y 19780 Hub Auto Supply 109.79 Truck Parts m 19781 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 271.59 Truck Supplies u 19782 Intellisys Group, Inc. 161.63 Computer Supplies 19783 Irvine Ranch Water District 46.82 Water Use 19784 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,209.93 Safety Supplies 19785 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 2.040.00 Training Expenses 19786 Jays Catering 1,157.71 Catering Services 19787 Yokogawa Corporation of America 1,801.99 Instrument Supplies 19788 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 23,590.07 Medical Insurance Premium 19789 Industrial Distribution Group 425.73 Tools 19790 Lab Support 3,600.00 Temporary Employment Services 19791 Lessons in Leadership 299.00 Registration 19792 Leybold Vacuum Products, Inc. 200.80 Lab Supplies 19793 Linkage, Inc. 5,330.53 Registration 19794 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2,470.00 Architectural Services 19795 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 1,846.90 Engineering Services 2-37 19796 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.950.46 Welding Supplies 19797 Mar Vac Electronics 1.62 Instrument Supplies 19798 MasTec Network Services 4,683.70 Communication Service 19799 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 116.20 Plumbing Supplies 19800 Mee Analytical System 650.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 19801 Mesa Muffler 127.75 Truck Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From SM6/99 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19802 Mission Abrasive Supplies 478.41 Tools&Supplies 19803 Mission Uniform Service 3,224.60 Uniform Rentals 19804 Mitchell Instrument Co. 70.00 Instruments 19805 Monitor Labs, Inc. 978.93 Instrument Maint. 19806 Motion Industries 94.94 Pump Supplies 19807 MotoPhoto 36.02 Photographic Services 19808 MPS Photographic Services 5.93 Photographic Services 19809 MSA C/O Mag Systems 159.03 Safety Supplies 19810 National Fire Protection Association 450.00 Membership 19811 National Information Data Center 48.90 Publication 19812 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 19813 Nautical Software 49.00 Software 19814 Network Construction Services 6,891.93 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project 19816 Network Solutions, Inc. 4,400.00 Communication Cables @ Plant 1 Gates 19816 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 980.00 Training Registration-Computer 19817 Nextel Communications 892.20 Cellular Phones&Air Time 19818 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 738.72 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 19819 Office Depot Business Services Div. 626.78 Office Supplies y 19820 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 403.70 Plumbing Supplies 19821 Ortiz Fire Protection 1,203.00 Service Agreement a, 19822 Oxygen Service Company 2,501.82 Specialty Gases 19823 OCB Reprographics 387.94 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19824 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 317.04 Electrical Supplies 19825 Pacific Bell 1,044.28 Telephone Services 19826 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,878.31 Plumbing Supplies 19827 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 987.60 Mechanical Supplies 19828 Pagenet 1,871.84 Rental Equipment 19829 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 149.75 Tires 19830 Parts Unlimited 369.76 Truck Supplies 19831 Penn State 535.00 Registration 19832 Perkin Elmer Service 1,719.74 Lab Supplies 19833 Permaseal 409.71 Lube Oil 19834 Pinkerton Systems Integration 4,60.03 Security Card Reader System 19835 Polydyne,Inc. 22.430.89 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19836 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 585.42 Electrical Supplies 19837 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 19838 Public Financial Management,Inc. 2,500.00 Financial Advisor Services 19839 PIHRA 100.00 Notices&Ads 19840 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,32422 Trash Removal 19841 Randolph Austin Co. 13227 Lab Supplies Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 5/31199 ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19842 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 721.14 Electrical Supplies 19843 Remedy Temp 2,377.60 Temporary Employment Services 19844 RBF Engineers 260.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 19845 Robinson Fertilizer Co., Inc. 1,330.78 Groundskeeping Supplies 19846 RPM Electric Motors 599.32 Electric Motor Repair 19847 IRS Hughes Co, Inc. 559.92 Paint Supplies 19848 Safelite Glass Corp. 173.01 Auto Supplies 19849 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 370.65 Mechanical Supplies 19850 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 191.79 Specialty Gases 19851 Sears Industrial Sales 675.37 Mechanical Supplies 19852 Seaventures 5,270.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 19853 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 6,897.87 Professional Services-Ocean Ouaall Instrumentation 19854 Second-Sun 951.64 Light Fixtures 19855 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 195.64 Tools 19856 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,829.54 Tools/Hardware 19857 Sloan Electric Company 15,635.46 Motor Repairs 19858 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 221.28 Plumbing Supplies m 19859 SoftChoice 951.68 Software y 19860 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 150.00 Emission Fees ee 19861 Sparklefts 2,070.94 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 19862 Sprint 44.70 Long Distance Telephone Service 19863 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 917.91 OBics Supplies 19864 Street Smart Professional Equipment 862.00 Safety Equipment 19865 StudloVisla 1.890.00 Computer Consulting Services 19866 Summit Steel 1.110.91 Metal 19867 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Mainl. 19868 Sunset Ford 264.81 Truck Supplies 19869 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals 19870 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 19871 Thomas M. Dawes 3,315.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 19872 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,658.02 Mechanical Supplies 19873 Tony's Lock&Safe Service& Sales 271.50 Locks&Keys 19874 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 1,042.75 Truck Supplies 19875 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 132.46 Truck Supplies 19876 Temystems 6.040.00 Temporary Employment Services 19877 TPC Training Systems 11.286.62 Training Software 19878 United Parcel Service 517.15 Parcel Services 19879 V&A Consulting Engineers 4,987.84 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 19880 Valley Cities Supply Company 326.64 Plumbing Supplies 19881 Veme's Plumbing 2,557.56 Plumbing Supplies Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19882 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,448.88 Vision Service Premium 19883 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,971.94 Lab Supplies 19884 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards 19885 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 2.69 Electrical Supplies 19886 Western States Chemical, Inc. 20,284.99 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 19887 Westrux International 60.75 Truck Supplies 19888 Windows NT Administrator Report 178.00 Subscription 19889 WESTCAS 160.00 Registration 19890 Xerox Corporation 2.412.18 Copier Leases 19891 Xetex Incorporated 144.00 Electrical Supplies 19892 Zenon Environmental Systems 24.000.00 Professional Service-Biosolids Site 19893 CNA Trust 13,943.10 Construction 541-1 19894 Joven E.Alop 653.50 Training Expense Reimb. 19895 Marcus D.Dubois 1.781.27 Training Expense Reimb. 19896 Victor M.Ferguson 798.02 Training Expense Reimb. 19897 Robert P.Ghirelli 236.00 Training Expense Reimb. 19898 L.Kevin Hadden 464.57 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19899 Rick J. Hannappel 556.40 Training Expense Reimb. y 19900 James D. Herberg 198.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. m 19901 Donald F. McIntyre 1,512.64 Meeting Expense Reimb. w 19902 Michelle Tuchman 548.62 Communications Expense Reimb. 19903 Environmental Lab Accreditation Program 3,119.00 Lab Certification 19904 Orange County Sanitation District 1,594.51 Petty Cash Reimb. 19905 Richard D. Plescia 632.51 Employee Computer Loan Program 19906 County of Orange 675.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19907 Blue Cross of California 132,000.00 Medical Insurance Premium Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.317.427.94 Payroll Disbursements 13959- 14091 Employee Paychecks $ 172,993.84 Biweekly Payroll 5/19/99 14092- 14114 Directors'Paychecks $ 7.493.87 Payroll 5/17/99 14115- 14115 Employee Paycheck 18,775.09 Termination 37747-38186 Direct Deposit Statements 637,977.31 Biweekly Payroll 5119/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 837.240.11 Total Claims Paid 5116/99-5/31/99 $ 4,154,668.05 Page 8 of 8 _ , BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mee n9 Date TOBditf Dlr. 7/21/99 AGENDA REPORT Item NV ber Item Number Orange County Sanitation District X FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A 1Ytlm`bI�1M'p EI�YnV3PF16gpa1W➢FILEa4LimL0ebda anldee. erase Page 1 ATTACHMENTS r 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 6/1/99 -- 6/15/99 & 6/16199 —6/30/99. BA Na3TVeu1\xydeVnV3%aYYige1YRFRE54h'mspaq We aam.e. w.wsa Page 2 4 � ' Claims Paid From 611199 to 6116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 19908 Orange County Sanitation District $ 391,731.04 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 19909 Orange County Water District 83,759.59 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 19910 Southern California Edison 50,576.65 Power 19911 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 81,660.32 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19912 American Sigma, Inc. 3.62 Instrument Supplies-Freight 19913 AT&T Wireless Service 1.975.63 Cellular Telephone Service 19914 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 19915 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 19916 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 19917 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 19918 Filter Supply Company 24.00 Filters 19919 Fish 2000 225.90 Lab Supplies 19920 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 19921 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.774.44 Dues Deduction 19922 IOMXs Report on Hourly Compensation 207.95 Subscription 19923 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 917.17 Safety Supplies 19924 Lessons in Leadership 100.00 Training Registration 19925 Maintenance Technology Corp. 615.85 Welding Supplies 19926 National Academy Press 66.81 Publication 19927 Orange County Family Support 761.50 Wage Garnishment 19928 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19929 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction 19930 Pacific Mechanical Supply 165.25 Plumbing Supplies 19931 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 19932 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19933 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 19934 Pryor Resources, Inc. 79.00 Training Registration 19935 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 643.92 Paint Supplies 19936 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 147.07 Mechanical Supplies 19937 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 564.39 Tools 19938 Showcase Corporation 107.75 Publication 19939 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 891.79 Tools/Hardware 19940 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,929.10 Emission Fees 19941 Summit Steel 1,023.93 Metal 19942 Thermo Oplek Corporation 8.92 Lab Equipment Maint. Service 19943 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 432.00 Biosolids Analysis 19944 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 119.83 Mechanical Supplies 19945 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 230.00 Membership 19946 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions Page t of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 19947 Water Environment Research Foundation 42,21 Publication 19948 Wyatt Data Services 389.00 Publication 19949 WESTCAS 25.00 Registration 19950 Layne T. Baroldi 154.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19951 Barbara A. Collins 113.44 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19952 Mark A. Esquer 206.88 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19953 Danny S. Evangelista 1.130.19 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19954 Michael L. Heinz 175.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19955 George L. Robertson 672.85 Training Expense Reimb. 19956 Richard L. Spencer 850.00 Training Expense Reimb. 19957 Robert J.Thiede 1.122.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19958 Carolyn L.Thompson 218.84 Office Supplies Expense Reimb. 19959 Brown&Caldwell 111,585.39 Engineering Services P1-37&J-35.1 19960 Carollo Engineers 55.581.15 Engineering Services 131-43,1132-50&J-25-4 19961 County Wholesale Electric Co. 29.113.47 Electrical Supplies 19962 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 158,248.00 Painting Maim.Services NO 4-22.98 19963 DGA Consultants, Inc. 29.179.94 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 19964 Gieriich-Mitchell, Inc. 30,797.89 Pump Supplies 19965 James Martin&Co. 117.257.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 19966 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 81.033.97 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19967 Nat West Markets 86,861.33 COP Letter of Credit Fees 19968 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 219,929.36 Engineering Services J42 19969 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 33,598.57 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19970 Polydyne, Inc. 31,696.20 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19971 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 249,187.88 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 19972 Sopp Chevrolet 73.192.42 2 Chevrolet Utility Trucks 19973 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 87,424.51 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19974 TPC Training Systems 70,757.44 Training Software 19975 UCI Irvine 33.814.00 Training Registration 19976 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 27.692.16 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification Now 044 19977 Ark Construction Company 75.568.32 Construction Pl444 19978 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 216,769.50 Construction P2-65 19979 Margate Construction 90,080.75 Construction P141, P248&P2-50 19980 AT&T Corporation 2,309.93 Long Distance Telephone Services 19981 A-Plus Systems 1,081.92 Notices&Ads 19982 Abeam 184.53 Hardware 19983 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 10,517.56 Engine Testing J-19 19984 Advanced Seating&Supply Co., Inc. 2,001.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19985 PJr Cold Supply 123.35 Air Conditioning Parts 19986 PJr Liquids America Corp. 718.78 Specialty Gasses Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 6/1/99 to 6116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19987 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89 19988 Airborne Express 43.25 Air Freight 19989 American Airlines 4,278.67 Travel Services 19990 Andys Salvage Pick Up 995.00 Construction Services-Material Removal 19991 Angel Scientific Products, Inc. 490.88 Lab Supplies 19992 Appleone Employment Service 6,078.74 Temporary Employment Services 19993 Applied Industrial Technology 579.17 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19994 Asbury Environmental Services 95.00 Waste Oil Removal 19995 ABB Automation Inc. 807.28 Instrument Parts&Supplies 19996 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 4,000.00 Professional Services-Flow Monitoring Project 19997 AAF International 1,278.98 Mechanical Supplies 19998 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 270.62 Telephone Services 19999 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 9.07 Cellular Telephone Service 20000 ATCC:American Type Culture Collection 57.75 Lab Supplies 20001 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 342.70 Electrical Supplies 20002 Battery Specialties 145.46 Batteries 20003 Bilco 941.47 Safety Supplies 20004 Bristol Systems, Inc. 21,472.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 20005 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,600.00 Surveying Services MO6-25-97 20006 Calif Centrifugal Pump 20,372.85 Pump Supplies 20007 Caltrol, Inc. 56.77 Valves 20008 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 6,798.00 Engineering Services P1-62 20009 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas, N.A. 6.890.00 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 20010 Cincinnati Incorporated 7,081.99 Tools 20011 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 1,542.82 Office Supplies 20012 Computers America, Inc. 5.370.40 Computer Supplies 20013 Condenser&Chiller Services, Inc. 4,889.70 Condenser Coils 20014 Connell GM Parts 7.85 Truck Supplies 20015 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 11.650.77 Electrical Supplies 20016 Consolidated Plastics Company 107.72 Lab Supplies 20017 Consumers Pipe& Supply Co. 46.53 Plumbing Supplies 20018 Converse Consultants 18.070.30 Consulting Services P2-65&6-12 20019 Cooper Energy Services 166.54 Engine Supplies 20020 Corporate Express 1,463.84 Office Supplies 20021 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 20022 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 175.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20023 County of Orange 105.00 Permit Fees 20024 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 244.85 Lab Supplies 20025 D'Angelo Company, Inc. 404.43 Valves 20026 Dee Jasper and Associates 3,358.04 Legal Service-Cartel Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6116/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 20027 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis 20028 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 7,316.01 1 Computer Workstation&4 Sony Monitors 20029 Don Maurer 2,555.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 20030 Dover Elevator Company 2.663.10 Elevator Maintenance 20031 Norman Eckenrode 117.14 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20032 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 4,400.00 CPR/First Aid Training 20033 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 20034 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 910.20 Lab Supplies 20035 Mark A. Esquer 361.65 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20036 ELG Environmental Construction 9,655.00 Cleaning Service-Fuel Tanks 20037 ENS Resources, Inc. 67.27 Professional Services-Legislative 20038 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 676.23 Maint. Service Agreement 20039 Faxpress, Inc. 1,854,32 Once Supplies 20040 FedEx Corporation 114.88 Air Freight 20041 Fibertron 196.80 Fiber Optic Cable 20042 Filter Supply Company 390.58 Filters 20043 Filterline Corporation 341.32 Filters 20044 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 164.02 Lab Supplies 20045 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,736.24 Pump Supplies 20046 Fountain Valley Camera 253.27 Photo Supplies 20047 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 493.99 Truck Wash Tickets 20048 Fry's Electronics 601.16 Computer Supplies 20049 City of Fullerton 116.48 Water Use 20050 FM Intemational, Inc. 7.425.00 Engineering Services J-25-1 20051 G. E.Supply 1.476.18 Electric Parts 20052 Gamatt-Callahan Company 693.37 Chemicals 20053 GTE California 4,216.33 Telephone Services 20054 George T. Hall 21.55 Electrical Supplies 20055 W W Grainger, Inc. 1,259.04 Compressor Supplies 20056 Graseby STI 4,693.26 Engine Supplies 20057 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 754.25 Instrument Supplies 20058 Haaker Equipment Company 33.23 Truck Supplies 20059 Harting&Associates 4,710.00 Professional Services-Process Control Software Standards 20060 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 646.66 Truck Supplies 20061 Herb's Blackforast Bakery&Deli 29.75 Catering Services 20062 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 4,345.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 20063 Holmes& Narver, Inc. 6,519.97 Engineering Services Pt-444 20064 Home Depot 223.26 Small Hardware 20065 Hopklns Technical Products $7.12 Pump Repair Page 4 of 8 .0 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20066 City of Huntington Beach 14,501.97 Water Use 20067 Idexx 785.03 Lab Supplies 20068 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,447.81 Office Supplies 20069 Industrial Air Compressor 2,801.50 Equipment Rental 20070 Industrial Electronic Repair, Inc. 499.88 Instrument Supplies 20071 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 25.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20072 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 217.67 Lab Supplies 20073 Interstate Battery Systems 439.40 Batteries 20074 Irvine Photo Graphics 362.92 Photographic Services 20075 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 20076 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 20077 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 1,768.07 Safety Supplies 20078 J &B Auto Parts 69.56 Auto Parts&Supplies 20079 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1.504.17 Instrument Supplies 20080 Jays Catering 95.30 Catering Services 20081 Jim's Suspension Service 75.00 Truck Repairs 20082 Johnstone Supply 1,229.50 Electrical Supplies 20083 Knowledge Point 421.55 Software Training 20084 Industrial Distribution Group 269.92 Tools 20085 Krieger& Stewart, Inc. 8.00 Professional Services Pl-64 20086 KADY International 2.500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental 20087 Lab Support 1.901.25 Temporary Employment Services 20088 Labware, Inc. 22,000.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 20089 LeserAll Corporation 371.53 Service Agreement 20090 Law Office of Rayehe Mazarei 2.800.00 Legal Service-Immigration 20091 Lee&Ro, Inc. 2,096.78 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 20092 Lexis-Nexis 679.72 Books&Publications 20D93 Mantek 323.76 Safety Supplies 20D94 Mar Vac Electronics 233.16 Instrument Supplies 20095 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 180.72 Plumbing Supplies 20096 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 108.95 Tools 20097 Mec Analytical System 1,360.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 20098 Medlin Controls Co. 220.45 Instrument Supplies 20099 Meeting Planners Plus 5,000.00 Professional Services 20100 Mellon Trust 16.486.13 Investment Custodian Bank 20101 Metier, Inc. 1,200.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project 20102 Mid-West Associates 4,609.40 Pump Supplies 20103 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 12,007.53 Mechanical Repairs 20104 Mission Uniform Service 3,702.99 Uniform Rentals - 20105 Mitchell Instrument Co. 803.00 Instruments Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 6/1/99 to 6/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20108 Morton Salt 720.15 Sah 20107 MotoPhoto 90.86 Photographic Services 20108 MJ Schiff&Associates, Inc. 2,829.30 Professional Services-Corrosion 20109 MPS Photographic Services 19.94 Photographic Services 20110 National Institute of Bids&Technology 911.00 Lab Supplies 20111 National Microcomp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 20112 National Seminars Group 395.00 Training Registration 20113 Neal Supply Co. 328.10 Plumbing Supplies 20114 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 9,458.23 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 20115 Ninyo&Moore 1,137.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 20116 Norcel Controls Incorporated 1,493.11 Instrument Supplies 20117 The Norco Companies 119.00 Mail Delivery Service 20118 Office Depot Business Services Div. 153.82 Office Supplies 20119 Olsson Construction, Inc. 8,800.00 Construction-Fiber Optic Cable&Access Ramp Project 20120 Orange County Forum 30.00 Meeting Expense 20121 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 360.29 Electrical Supplies 20122 Orange Volvo&Fitting Company 957.09 Fittings 20123 Oxygen Service Company 839.32 Specialty Gases 20124 OCB Reprographics 3.465.21 Printing Service-Spec P-173 20125 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,255.26 Electrical Supplies 20126 Pacific Bell 20.30 Telephone Services 20127 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 20128 Pacific Mechanical Supply 22,401.94 Plumbing Supplies 20129 Pacific Pans and Controls, Inc. 4.064.28 Software 20130 Pantone 71.53 Publication 20131 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 840.49 Lab Supplies 20132 Perna Pure, Inc. 201.28 Filter 20133 Palm Animal Supplies 29.06 Lab Supplies 20134 Power Lift Corporation 2,525.00 Training Registration 20135 Primary Source 887.04 Office Furniture 20136 Primavera 1,975.97 Software 20137 Pulsafeeder, Inc. 4.189.08 Pump Supplies 20138 Quickstan Technologies 1.495.00 Training Registration 20139 R. L.Abbott&Associates 12,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 20140 Randolph Austin Co. 513.03 Lab Supplies 20141 Remedy Temp 3,817.88 Temporary Employment Services 20142 Restek Corp 524.93 Lab Supplies 20143 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 380.04 Auto Repair 20144 Rosemount/Uniloc 1,262.00 Instrument Supplies 20145 RPM Electric Motors 931.45 Electric Motor Repair Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20146 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 1.028.36 Paint Supplies 20147 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2,323.62 Motor Repair 20148 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 66.27 Mechanical Supplies 20149 Schemers Waste Water Products,Inc. 4,376.50 Chemical-Tank Cleaning 20160 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1.772.00 Specialty Gases 20151 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 362.25 Lab Repairs 20152 Second-Sun 274.18 Light Fixtures 20153 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 289.76 Tools 20154 Shepherd Machinery Co 1,147.47 Truck Supplies 20155 Supelco, Inc. 1,745.47 Lab Supplies 20156 Soco-Lynch Corp. 987.85 Janitorial Services 20157 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 175.60 Emission Fees 20158 Southern California Edison 5,918.38 Power 20159 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 68.19 Lab Supplies 20160 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 20161 Summit Steel 2,958.48 Metal 20162 Sunset Ford 4.18 Truck Supplies 20163 SKC-West, Inc. 859.74 Safety Supplies 20164 Telebyte Technology, Inc. 758.47 Security System Equipment 20165 ThirdWave 12,500.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project 20166 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 715.19 Mechanical Supplies 20167 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 20168 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 278.50 Locks 8 Keys 20169 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 200.70 Truck Supplies 20170 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 3,052.00 Lab Services 20171 TCH Associates, Inc. 900.86 Lab Supplies 20172 Teksystems 15.120.00 Temporary Employment Services 20173 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 4.181.46 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 20174 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,139.74 Plumbing Supplies 20175 The Ventage Group, L.L.C. 14,457.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 20176 Vector Resources 7.785.30 Cable Installation 20177 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10.276.37 Lab Supplies 20178 The Wackenhut Corporation 6.083.04 Security Guards 20179 Warrington Labs, Inc. 213.00 Service Agreement 20180 Western States Chemical, Inc. 14,893.05 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 20181 JPR Systems Inc.clo Whessoe Varec, Inc. 98.62 Valves 20182 Witeg Scientific 354.22 Lab Supplies 20183 Xerox Corporation 8,372.77 Copier Leases 20184 3 Com Corporation 4,000.00 Training Registration 20185 Bradley H. Cagle 876.38 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20186 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 738.56 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20187 Dionne Kardos 272.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20188 Miriam Loyo 382.34 Training Expense Reimb. 20189 Michael D.Moore 151.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20190 Antonino Pira 1,376.87 Training Expense Reimb. 20191 Julie A. Pritchard 831.58 Training Expense Reimb, 20192 Henry R. Salgado 971.17 Training Expense Reimb. 20193 SkillPath Seminars 295.00 Training Registration 20194 Moyasar T.Yahya 935.85 Training Expense Reimb. 20195 Orange County Sanitation District 2,409.46 Petty Cash Reimb. 20196 Mark Castillo 1,677.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20197 Lockheed Martin 9,000.00 Mail Delivery Service Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,138,846.95 Payroll Disbursements 14116-14249 Employee Paychecks $ 172.128.03 Biweekly Payroll 612199 14250- 14250 Employee Paycheck 16,500.01 Termination 38187-38626 Direct Deposit Statements 615.364.18 Biweekly Payroll 612199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 803,992.22 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 152.235.83 June Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase Bank of Texas National Association 243.178.35 June Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 209.800.73 June Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 605,214.91 Total Claims Paid 611/99-6115/99 $ 4,548,054.08 Page 8 of 8 ,c' Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 20198 Voided Check $ - - 20199 Orange County Sanitation District 459,187.97 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 20200 Southern California Edison 44,966.44 Power 20201 Orange County Sanitation District 37,474.43 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 20202 Awards&Trophies By Bea 48.49 Plaques 20203 AMAXeye Productivity Center 159.00 Registration 20204 AMA/Padget-Thompson 149.00 Seminar Registration 20205 American Landscape&Supply 1.794.04 2 Concrete Picnic Tables 20206 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 103.95 Telephone Services 20207 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 20208 Voided Check - - 20209 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 20210 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 2,6T7.24 Electrical Supplies 20211 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment - 20212 CWEA 45.00 Membership 20213 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 20214 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 20215 GTE California 4.800.22 Telephone Services 20216 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 25.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 20217 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 20218 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.10 Water Use 20219 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,163.00 Safety Supplies 20220 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,078.54 Tools 20221 Orange County Family Support 761.50 Wage Garnishment 20222 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 20223 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 75.68 Electrical Supplies 20224 OCEA 633.57 Dues Deduction 20225 Pacific Bell 48.75 Telephone Services 20226 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 20227 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 20228 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 20229 City of Seal Beach 67.59 Water Use 20230 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 34.37 Tools 20231 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 441.82 Tools/Hardware 20232 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 20233 Sievers Instruments 800.00 Registration 20234 So.Cal.Gas Company 12,956.35 Natural Gas 20235 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 261.54 Mechanical Supplies 20236 U.S. Postal Service 2,200.00 Postage Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid From 6/16/99 to 6130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20237 United Way 307.83 Employee Contributions 20238 Blake Anderson 2,000.70 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20239 Layne T. Baroldi 464.20 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20240 Michael D. Moore 793.35 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20241 Robert Dolan 1,253.55 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20242 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 30,353.00 Engine Testing J-19 20243 RPIBio Gro 113,207.10 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 20244 Brown&Caldwell 103,485.45 Engineering Services Pt-37 20245 County Wholesale Electric Co. 26,560.09 Electrical Supplies 20246 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 65,797.76 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 20247 DGA Consultants, Inc. 41,822.27 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 20248 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 146,770.60 Professional Services JAO< 20249 JLM General Contracting&Environ. Svcs. 31,380.54 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair 20250 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 91.973.52 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 20251 Lee&Ro, Inc. 36,224.22 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12.8-94 20252 National Water Research Institute 50,000.00 Membership 20253 Oracle Corp 40.328.15 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 20254 Pacificare of Ca. 34.757.01 Health Insurance Premium 20255 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 25,661.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 20256 Racal Palagos, Inc. 32,120.00 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Survey 20257 Volded Check - - 20258 Schreiber Corporation 97,500.00 3 MGD Fuuy Filter Test Unit Installment 20259 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 91.082.21 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 20260 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 26,444.94 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 20281 Western States Chemical, Inc. 34,189.04 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 20262 WesTach clo Pacific Process 49,051.03 Primary Basin Equipment Test Unit-Cage Drive Mechanism 20263 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 95,762.36 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 20264 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 116,582.09 Construction 3.38-1 &7-17 20265 Mike Pdich&Sons 499,375.00 Construction 6-12 20266 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 73,499.00 Construction 3.38-3,2-R-97 20267 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 108.045.00 Construction 2-34R 20288 Aearo Company 1,008.00 Safety Supplies 20269 Aidco Systems, Inc. 8,869.51 Electrical Supplies 20270 Air Cold Supply 190.20 Air Conditioner Repairs 20271 Air Liquids America Corp. 937.27 Specialty Gasses 20272 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 6-8-89 20273 Airborne Express 162.75 Air Freight 20274 Allied Systems/Supply Co. 16,837.81 Plumbing Supplies 20275 American Seals West 894.76 Gaskets 20276 Analysts, Inc. 850.99 Testing Kits Page 2 of 10 c Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6/30/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20277 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 490.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 20278 Appleone Employment Service 8.575.39 Temporary Employment Services 20279 Applied Industrial Technology 2,106.60 Electrical Parts&Supplies 20280 Associated Vacuum Tech., Inc. 149.11 Filter 20281 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 20282 Awards&Trophies By Bea 176.36 Plaques 20283 Azur Environmental 917.16 Lab Supplies 20284 AWSI 199.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 20285 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 5.066.98 Telephone Installation 20286 Barnes&Noble Books 273.11 Publication 20287 Battery Specialties 719.34 Batteries 20288 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 221.97 Valve Supplies 20289 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 499.76 Office Supplies 20290 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 1,083.12 Lab Supplies 20291 Bloomberg L.P. 5,268.98 Financial Monitoring MO 4.14-93 20292 Bolas Radiator Service 65.00 Truck Repairs 20293 Brinderson Corp. 8,800.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 20294 Bristol Systems, Inc. 11,637.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 20295 Brooks Instrument Div. 284.62 Instruments 20296 C.Wells Pipeline Materials, Inc. 415.92 Plumbing Supplies 20297 C.S.U.F. Foundation 8,750.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 20298 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 406.22 Service Agreement 20299 California Comfort Vans 3,663.50 Interior Modifn. 20300 California Hazardous Services, Inc. 3.400.00 Fuel Tank Cleaning 20301 Calolympic Safety 424.10 Safety Supplies 20302 Caltrol, Inc. 440.02 Valves 20303 Career Track 99.00 Registration 20304 Carollo Engineers 22,836.18 Engineering Services P1-36-2 20305 Charles P. Crowley Co. 649.47 Instrument Parts 20306 City of Santa Ana 1.420.00 Manhole &Landscaped Medians Rehab. 20307 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 5,086.27 Professional Services-Ergonomic 20308 Coast Fire Equipment 300.00 Service Agreement 20309 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg, 41.97 Office Supplies 20310 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 729.07 Lab Supplies 20311 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 18,180.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Program 20312 Computers America, Inc. 1,544.97 Computer Supplies 20313 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,422.79 Electrical Supplies 20314 Converse Consultants 230.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 20315 Cooper Cameron Corporation 149.56 Engine Supplies 20316 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20317 Corporate Express 987.40 Office Supplies 20318 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 20319 Cost Containment Solutions 552.34 Worker's Comp. Services 20320 County of Orange 570.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 20321 Culligan of Orange County 3.893.50 Soft Water Service 20322 Cummins Allison Corp. 918.90 Maintenance Agreement 20323 CEPA Company 1,010.00 Equipment Mart. Service 20324 CH2MHill 6,452.24 Engineering Services J-31-4 20325 CR&R, Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 20326 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads 20327 Datavault 177.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 20328 Dee Jasper and Associates 250.00 Legal Service-Cartel 20329 Del Mar Analytical 1,856.00 Bicsolids Analysis 20330 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 17,364.78 2 Computer Workstations,4 H.P. Printers&Misc. Supplies 20331 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 3,667.81 Valves 20332 Diamond H Recognition 94.75 Employee Service Awards 20333 Discount Audio 4,259.02 Communication Equipment 20334 Don Maurer 3,150.00 Consulting Service-Oeean Monitoring Program 20335 Robert F. Driver Associates 753.00 Travel Insurance MO 6-10-92 20336 DME, Inc. 116.60 Compressor Parts 20337 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,093.00 Medical Screening 20338 Electra-Bond 17,132.25 Mechanical Supplies-Belt Filter Press Rollers 20339 Darrell S. Ennis 121.04 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20340 Environmental Data Solutions Grps, L.L.0 8.340.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info. Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project 20341 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.256.22 Professional Services-Legislative 20342 F.H. Pumps 1,264.99 Pump Supplies 20343 FedEx Corporation 60.67 Air Freight 20344 Filter Supply Company 5,820.33 Filters 20345 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 1,236.35 Lab Supplies 20346 Flo-Systems, Inc. 12,746.72 Pump Supplies 20347 Fluid Dynamics 910.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental 20348 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17.936.43 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium 20349 Fountain Valley Camera 107.65 Photo Supplies 20350 Fountain Valley Palms, Inc. 647.58 Paint Supplies 20351 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 344.00 Truck Wash Tickets 20352 Franklin Covey 106.40 Office Supplies 20353 Franklin Covey Co. 189.00 Training Registration 20354 Fred Pryor Seminars 195.00 Training Registration 20355 Fry's Electronics 1,565.15 Computer Supplies Page 4 of 10 e Claims Paid From 6/16/99 to 6130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20356 FM International, Inc. 2,400.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 20357 G.E.Supply 1,274.68 Electric Parts 20358 Ganshl Lumber Company 141.18 Lumber/Hardware 20359 GTE California 987.62 Telephone Services 20360 Geomattix Consultants 21.037.71 Legal Services-Cartel 20361 Global Engineering&Management 7,740.00 Consul0ng Services-Asset Management Program 20362 WW Grainger, Inc. 1,322.52 Compressor Supplies 20363 Graseby STI 145.56 Engine Supplies 20364 Great American Printing Co. 97.36 Printing Service 20365 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 77.92 Janitorial Supplies 20366 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 1,734.78 Instrument Supplies 20367 GMF Sound, Inc. 232.85 Audio System Maim.-Tour Bus 20368 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 529.78 Plumbing Supplies 20369 Harting&Associates 3,870.00 Primary Basin Equipment Test Unit-Cage Drive Mechanism 20370 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 251.05 Truck Supplies 20371 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 279.50 Catering Services 20372 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 2,059.97 Compressor Parts 20373 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 450.00 Maint Services-Sewer Cleaning 20374 Home Depot 857.53 Small Hardware 20375 Hopkins Technical Products 87.12 Pump Supplies 20376 Hub Auto Supply 329.05 Truck Parts 20377 Huni s Final Phase 481.50 Misc. Construction 20378 Hydrotex 10.744.06 Lube Oil 20379 Idexx 1,342.51 Lab Supplies 20380 Imaging Plus, Inc. 220.78 Once Supplies 20381 Industrial Shoe Co. 1.195.49 Safety Supplies 20382 StateNet 165.00 Online Service 20383 Innoven0ons, Inc. 2,245.25 Computer Troubleshooting Equipment 20384 Instashred Security Services 90.00 Destruction of Termination Files 20385 institute for Research&Technology 7,000.00 IRTA Grant-Pollution Prevention Center 20386 Intergraph Corporation 10,785.00 Software 20387 Irvine Ranch Water District 23.92 Water Use 20388 Ism, Inc 6.094.63 Lab Supplies 20389 IOMA's Salary Surveys 227.95 Subscription 20390 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 57.18 Safety Supplies 20391 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 5,600.36 Instrument Supplies 20392 J. H. Hall&Associates 147.40 Paint Supplies 20393 J.D.Edwards 4,590.00 Training Registration 20394 James Martin&Co. 387.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 20395 Jay's Catering 582.58 Catering Services Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20396 Jim's Suspension Service 45.00 Truck Repairs 20397 Johnstone Supply 651.49 Electrical Supplies 20398 K.P. Lindstrom 7,282.80 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 20399 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 23.209.10 Medical Insurance Premium 20400 Kelly Paper 24.29 Paper 20401 Industrial Distribution Group 688.81 Tools 20402 Kris Keligian 1,02500 Contractual Services-Publication 20403 Lab Support 4.217.40 Temporary Employment Services 20404 Le Motte Chemical Products 51.12 Sulfide Test Kit 20405 League of Ca. Cities,Orange County Div. 540.00 Membership 20406 Lieben,Cassidy&Frierson 860.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 20407 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2,322.08 Architectural Services 20408 Mar Vac Electronics 19.78 Instrument Supplies 20409 Marcy Rothenberg 630.00 Professional Services-Writer for the Internet Project 20410 The Marketing Group, Inc. 7,848.51 Lab Supplies 20411 MasTec Network Services 9,562.92 Communication Service 20412 Matt Chlor, Inc. 1.267.25 Valves 20413 Mc Junkin Corporation 2.970.61 Plumbing Supplies 20414 Donald F. McIntyre 854.27 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20415 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 452.98 Tools 20416 Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. 608.00 Electrical Maint. 20417 Mesa Muffler 138.52 Truck Supplies 20418 Mission Uniform Service 3,452.97 Uniform Rentals 20419 Mitchell Instrument Co. 956.00 Instruments 20420 Motion Industries 1.200.95 Pump Supplies 20421 MotoPhoto 62.00 Photographic Services 20422 Natural Fuels Corporation 150.00 Publication 20423 Network Construction Services 352.00 Construction Services-VolcelDeta Bldg Rewiring Project 20424 Network Solutions, Inc. 480.0D Shop Bldgs Voice/Data Migration Services 20425 Nlckey Petroleum Co., Inc. 20,888.25 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 20426 Northwestern Carbon 1,434.55 Filters 20427 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,144.35 Office Supplies 20428 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 3.79 Plumbing Supplies 20429 The Orange County Register 31.38 Subscription 20430 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 258.54 Electrical Supplies 20431 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 174.17 Fittings 20432 Oxygen Service Company 1,048.91 Specialty Gases 20433 OCB Reprographics 6.589.61 Printing Service-Spec P-173 20434 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,892.04 Electrical Supplies 20435 Pacific Bell 1,042.02 Telephone Services Page 6 of 10 �' Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 6130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20436 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4,437.50 Plumbing Supplies 20437 Pagenet 2,453.10 Rental Equipment 20438 Parts Unlimited 88.27 Truck Supplies 20439 Peak Technologies 1,486.89 Lab Supplies 20440 Pinkerton Systems Integration 7.893.22 Security Card Reader System 20441 Polydyne, Inc. 18,584.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 2D442 Power Lift Corporation 850.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training 20443 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin. 20444 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 687.59 Mechanical Supplies 20445 PC Magazine 34.97 Subscription 20446 Qulckstart Technologies 1.495.00 Training Registration 20447 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,324.22 Trash Removal 20448 Ralnln Instrument Co., Inc. 119.48 Lab Supplies 20449 Rapidpdnt 91.90 Office Supplies 20450 Realtime Systems Corporation 1.000.00 Integration&Support Services 20451 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,041.16 Life Insurance Premium 20462 Remedy Temp 4,184.92 Temporary Employment Services 20453 Restek Corp 176.64 Lab Supplies 20454 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 478.88 Auto Repair 20455 RPM Electric Motors 12,835.25 Electric Motor Repair 20456 RS Hughes Cc, Inc. 82.10 Paint Supplies 20457 Satellite Glass Corp. 323.25 Auto Supplies 20458 Laidlaw Environmental Services 713.00 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 20459 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 6,500.00 Construction-Pipe Repair 20460 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 178.34 Specialty Gases 20461 Seal Service&Sales Co., Inc. 218.19 Mechanical Supplies 20462 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 5,234.33 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 20463 Second-Sun 2,059.34 Light Fixtures 20464 Shopping.Com 54e.43 Computer Supplies 20465 Sierra Automated Valve Services, Inc. 2,333.28 Plumbing Supplies 20466 Supelco,Inc. 1,533.32 Lab Supplies 20467 SkIIIPath Seminars 149.00 Training Registration 20468 So.Cal. Gas Company 9,270.94 Natural Gas 20469 SoftChoice 12,416.10 Software 20470 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 16,958.00 Emission Fees 20471 Southern California Marine Institute 962.50 Equipment Rental-Ocean Monitoring Vessel 20472 Southern California Water Committee 750.00 Membership 20473 Specialty Technical Publishers, Inc. 320.75 Subscription 20474 Spex Cedprep, Inc. 865.30 Lab Supplies 20475 Spoolmasler 368.91 Cable Reel Dispenser Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid From 6/16199 to 6130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20478 Sprint 39.60 Long Distance Telephone Service 20477 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 42.32 Pump Supplies 20478 Suncor Marine&Industrial 71.12 Lab Supplies 20479 Sunset Industrial Parts 858.75 Mechanical Supplies 20480 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 20481 Taylor-Dunn 364.48 Electric Cart Parts 20482 Foxboro Company 877.45 Instrument Supplies 20483 The Merriwood Corporation 7,162.19 Professional Services-Siosolids Land Inspection 20484 The Register 891.00 Notices&Ads 20485 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 490.56 Mechanical Supplies 20486 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 23.71 Locks&Keys 20487 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 40.00 Seminar Registration 20488 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 140.30 Truck Supplies 20489 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,370.00 Lab Services 20490 Two Wheels One Planet 54.90 Bicycle Supplies 20491 Teksystems 6,040.00 Temporary Employment Services 20492 Ultra Scientific 1,024.77 Lab Supplies 20493 The Unisource Corporation 877.90 Office Supplies 20494 United Parcel Service 714.69 Parcel Services 20495 Unocal Corporation 103.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 20496 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 200.00 Membership 20497 U-Line 87.82 Office Supplies 20498 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,162.91 Plumbing Supplies 20499 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 16,320.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 20500 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,387.94 Door Repair 20501 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5,167.64 Lab Supplies 20502 The Wackenhut Corporation 5.950.85 Security Guards 20503 Weftec'99 1,060.00 Registration 20504 Western Sandblasting Company 600.00 Sandblasting 20505 Xerox Corporation 10,641.03 Copier Leases 20506 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 10,347.30 Construction 541-1 20507 CNA Trust 1,149.70 Construction 541-1 20508 Systems Integrated 9,094.35 Construction Services J-31.3 20509 Bleks Anderson 175.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20510 Kelly J.Christensen 250.00 Meeting Expense 20511 Linda D. Contreras 206.39 Notary Membership Reimb, 20512 Chuck Hodge 421.13 Meeting Expense Reimb, 20513 David A. Ludwin 258.73 Meeting Expanse Reimb. 20514 James L.Wybenga 250.00 Meeting Expense 20515 Jefrey Key&Compuxpress 1,813.44 Employee Computer Loan Program Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6/30199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20516 Ludolph Lommer&Micro Center 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 20517 Orange County Sanitation District 1,128.50 Petty Cash Reimb. 20518 County of Orange 21.15 Administrative Fees 20519 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 64,650.00 Computer Based Training Software 20520 Orange County Sanitation District 404,240.30 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 20521 Snap-On Incorporated 42,042.41 Tools 20522 Southern California Edison 53,942.62 Power 20523 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson 159.00 Registration 20524 City of Orange 75.00 Permit Fee 20525 Claim Jumper Restaurant 100.00 Luncheon Meeting Expense-O. C. Fair Appreciation 20526 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 389.28 Electrical Supplies 20527 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 321.57 Plumbing Supplies 20528 Control Techniques Drives, Inc. 35.00 Publication 20529 Court Order 611.07 Wage Gamishment 20530 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 20531 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 24,861.30 Consulting Services-FIS Impl. &Support 20532 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 20533 Government Finance Officers Association 55.00 Subscription 20534 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 109.91 Plumbing Supplies 20535 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,760.13 Dues Deduction 20536 Mar Vac Electronics 198.90 Instrument Supplies 20537 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 98.32 Tools 20538 National Seminars Group 433.68 Training Registration 20539 Operation Technology,Inc. 2,055.87 Software Maint. 20540 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 20541 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 1,352.16 Electrical Supplies 20542 OCEA 642.82 Dues Deduction 20543 Postmaster 194.00 Post Office Box Rental 20544 Quest Software 483.80 Publication 20545 RJN Group, Inc. 9.000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 20546 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 383.52 Tools/Hardware 20547 SMIIPath Seminars 295.00 Training Registration 20548 Foxboro Company 19.31 Instrument Supplies 20549 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.803.05 Mechanical Supplies 20550 Trainers Assoc of Southern California 60.00 Membership 20551 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 20552 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 20553 Weftec'99 590.00 Registration 20554 WEF-Registration Dept. 1,255.00 Meeting Registration 20555 WEFTEC'99 Housing 150.00 Meeting Expense Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 6130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 20556 Xerox Corporation 44.79 Equipment Lease 20557 Laurie S. Bluestein 953.75 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20558 Richard A. Castillon 183.00 Publication Expense Reimb. 20559 Robert P. Ghirelli 1,406.09 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20560 John W. Swindler 1.406.40 Meeting Expense Relmb. 20561 Daniel R.Tremblay 133.35 Meeting Expense Reimb. 20562 Rachelle Newton 203.92 Claim-Vehicle Damage 20563 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 27,877.38 Consulting Services-FIS Support 8 CMMS/FIS Integration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,008,295.10 Payroll Disbursements 14251 - 14389 Employee Paychecks $ 188.536.91 Biweekly Payroll 6/16199 14390-14546 Employee Paychecks 242.280.69 Reim and Termination Paychecks 14547-14570 Directors'Paychecks 6,892.46 Payroll 6/22199 14571 -14704 Employee Paychecks 174,295.71 Biweekly Payroll 6/30199 38627-39519 Direct Deposit Statements 1,306,832.76 Biweekly Payrolls'6116199&6130/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,918,838.52 Wire Transfer Payments Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. $ 71,807.64 Quarterly Liquidity on Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 71,807.64 Total Claims Paid SM6199.6/30199 $ 5,996,941.26 Page 10 of 10 ,� , BOARD OF DIRECTORS Nmsno Daft ro BE.ofar. �1z 19 AGENDA REPORT IMMNumber I 1e NUMbe B Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Joe Rycraw, Principal Engineer Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-4, HAIGH ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petitions from each of the 44 property owners to annex 39.39 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity of Lower Lake Drive and Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Lemon Heights (Annexation No. OCSD-4— Haigh Annexation); (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-12, authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District; and (3)Approve Sewer Service Agreement with each of the 44 property owners of Annexation No. OCSD-4—Haigh Annexation. SUMMARY When the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (now Orange County Sanitation District— OCSD) were first formed, many areas within the overall service area were outside of any incorporated city. At that time, for a parcel to be served and provided sewer service, it either had to be sponsored by a local sewering agency, or be annexed to one of the several districts in existence at that time. Many areas, such as the unincorporated Lemon Heights area of former District No. 7, still have parcels that have never annexed to any District and therefore cannot receive sewer service. This proposed annexation solves the sewer service problem for 44 property owners. About one year ago, Tom Haigh, developer of Tract No. 8622, was asked by the surrounding homeowners to join in his annexation and sewering system process. Mr. Haigh is developing a tract of seven homes in the Lemon Heights area. There are 44 property owners and 57 parcels included in this annexation. Some of the owners plan to connect immediately, while others plan to connect later, as public sewers are completed. Each parcel owner, who is not currently connecting to the new sewer system being constructed, has paid a $1,000 deposit per parcel towards the annexation fees. The balance of the annexation fees and the capital facilities capacity charge would be paid by these property owners at the time a connection permit is issued for connection to the sewer system. Those property owners that have chosen to connect to the sewer system now, will pay all annexation and capital facilities capacity charges at this time. wedolmltll o=m gwda�ld Poem RlpftNls a Pd Aceda eeoommeaee.,,a da Page 1 The Sewer Service Agreement will: (1) Provide the mechanism for all the property owners to share in the cost of the construction and the ownership of all commonly owned sewer facilities being currently constructed on private property, which are necessary to connect to the District sewer system. (2) Allow each of the property owners to proportionally share in the annexation fee and permit cost. (3) Allow each property owner to either pay in full at this time, the required annexation fee or pay the balance due at the time the owner applies for a connection permit to the District's sewer system. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B. 8; a tax exchange for annexing properties, approved by the Board of Directors on March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee that includes the following: $2,500.00 Extraordinary District Processing Fee $6,000.00 LAFCO Processing Fee $1,200.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $153,745.02 District Annexation Acreage Fee $38.00 Calif. Environmental Quality Act Fee 3 861.00 Area-Wide Planning Study Fee $167.344.02 Total Annexation Fee PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION It is more efficient for the District to process one large annexation than 44 separate annexations. Furthermore, each property owner benefits from the savings of being able to spread out the six portions of the annexation fees over 44 participants, thus reducing the overall fees per parcel. ,�.eommv,e ne 1,.. o.,e a1111.eon,e Raw.Weem—aaw Page 2 ALTERNATIVES No viable alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Legal Description — Exhibit "A" 2. Map — Exhibit —"B" RJR:jak:jo:jak:gc 1Yadon\data1\wp.dtaragendM5oard Agenda Repoft%1999 Board Agenda ReporW079Ntern 9.dot 1YMmba9l Y.y.OlaYpeNalO.vk lnntla Re{ab\1B3d BivN l.pdWi RepvbV']LdM e.M Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-4 HAIGH ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I That Portion of Block 14 of Irvine's Subdivision, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 1 Page 2 88 of Miscellaneous Maps. records of Orange County, California, in the county of Orange, State 3 of California described as follows: 4 Beginning at the most Easterly comer of Parcel 4 of that certain Parcel Map recorded in Book 5 119 pages 39 and 40 of Parcel Maps, Records of said County, said point also being the most 6 easterly comer of the Nelson Annexation No. 74 to Orange County Sanitation District No. 7; 7 thence South 39047'21"West 81.89 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence along the 8 Southwesterly and Northerly boundary of said Annexation No. 74 through its various courses to 9 a point on the Westerly right-of-way of said Lower Lake Drive, 30.00 feet West of Centerline; 10 said point being the easterly terminus of that certain course in said Annexation No. 74 shown as 11 North 65004'00"East 1.09 feet; thence leaving said boundary of said Annexation No. 24, along 12 the Existing Sanitation District No. 7 Boundary per East Lemon Heights North 50020'30" West 13 783.70 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of Lot 20 of Tract 694, said line also being its 14 . northeasterly prolongation and the southeasterly line of Tract 9399; thence along said 15 northwesterly line South 39°38'00"West 1166.86 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 16 20; thence along said southerly line South 66038'50"East 234A5 feet thence continuing along 17 said southerly line North 84°15'507East 71.56 feet to a point of the westerly line of Tract 8622; 18 thence along said westerly line South 5044'10"East 102.48 feet thence continuing along said 19 westerly line South 19°46'00"West 171.92 feet;thence continuing along said westerly line South 20 24'57'00"West 65.10 feet to a point on the boundary of the southerly line of Lot 26 of Tract 694; 21 thence along said boundary through the following courses: South 88008'10"East 59.56 feet; 22 South 20017'40"West 148.00 feet; South 2047'10"East 32.47 feet North 79015'20"Ea9 124.61 23 feet South, 79035'10"East 86.83 feet; South 64'22'407East 47.39 feet; South 36031'20"East 24 115.68 -feet, South 23'22'50"East 110.43 feet; South 28°59'50"East 71.40 feet South 25 12047'40"East 69.30 feet; South 17°40'50"West 163.25 feet; North 57003'30"East 98.44 feet; 26 North 77'57'10"East 308.65 feet; thence leaving said boundary of the southerly line of Lot 26, 27 along the westerly line of Instrument No. 19960282720, North 2'22'1 l"East 260.23 feet to a 28 point on the southerly line of Instrument No. 86-322047; thence along said southerly line North 29 94152'I I"East 195.71 to a point on the southerly prolongation of the centerline of Lot Y per 30 Tract 694, thence along said prolongation and centerline of said Lot Y, said centerline also being Page I of 2 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-4 HAIGH ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I the centerline of East Lemon Heights Drive,North 29°44'40"East 85.88 feet; thence leaving said 2 centerline of Lot Y and East Lemon Heights Drive, South 41°07'30" East 83.04 feet to the most 3 southerly corner of Parcel I of Tract Map 694; comer being a point on the southeasterly line of 4 said Parcel 1, said line also being the southerly prolongation of the boundary of Parcel 1 of Lot 5 Line Adjustment 78-13, thence along said southeasterly line and said prolongation the following 6 courses: South 2°14'28"West 113.89 feet; North 63054'40"East 181.30 feet; North 7 48002'00"East 111.04 feet; North 61037136"West 117.16 feet; thence leaving said boundary of 8 Parcel 1, along the boundary of Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment 78-13, through the following 9 courses: North 0°3614"East 190.53 feet; South 45033'30"East 71.68 feet; South 85021'00"East 10 112.13; thence leaving said boundary, along the easterly line of Parcel 1 of Lot Line Adjustment 11 92-034, through the following courses: North 5°19'40"East 133.34 feet; North 5028'25"East 12 74.49 feet; North 14°56'15'West 67.00 feet; North 22049'43"West 33.79 feet to the True Point 13 of Beginning 14 Said Annexation containing 39.392 Acres oFAOFESSl044 15 Attached and Made part of is a map,designated as Exhibit'B" w -.1601 1 16 W I No.013195 m 17 Pre d by: E�.3131MI s 18 �0f CAL\F��' 19 G.Bart Stryker,R.C.E. 13195 (Exp. 3/31/01) 20 21 This proposal does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office 22 Dated this day of 1998. 23 By 24 John Canas,County Surveyor Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT IB" ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-s HAIGH ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT v r r�Prmrpsm'ppw�Nrq �RSHD pp�q m. :. yPwum.PB 'i Bur uru �t, r,N ' BM;n BMw nRR"{Y •• �. '. BR�� LL �1Ii 4� RN Ir � Tur rBn Epvn wvmnBm�m ' yyIInn nr.Bu Bs rBIpN .OIITP 'B�'CP �BT4yy V / � Pr)PRTVC" ' u rmq LL P wn!n� MIMO Br R l IS0.u'L u0 RrnmG ]q cqn NSm�qrP.5"R�A O clA1 In•I IY.O.9ff ,, YR[ � •M1O BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mee RO Drte TO Bd.I on d AGENDA REPORT iem NumCe Iem NumEv to Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, NORMAN PARSONS V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and File Petition for Writ of Mandate, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 811565, and, (2) Authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see General Counsel's memo dated July 15, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS General Counsel's memo dated July 15, 1999 M"Nalpxga 4ApenCe Re{v %IM& WAp Repm6NiB 10 E¢ R„. a Page 1 Y DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES COMBINED MEETING Wednesday, June 23, 1999 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, June 23, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: - Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Don Hughes Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Kits Lindstrom Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Leslie Moulton Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Ryal Wheeler John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Mike Pelerman, Director of Human Resources Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Committee Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications North Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Peter Green, Director Directors Absent: Peer Swan, Vice Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Chair Jan Debay reported that Director Peer Swan was in Washington, DC, seeking support for the OCWD/OCSD Groundwater Replenishment System project. OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fwu ain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962.2411 B Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 2 June 23, 1999 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the May 26, 1999 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. The minutes of the May 27, 1999 meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Debay did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that a dosed session would be required to discuss labor negotiations. He distributed a report on flow projections and the new connection fee calculations to provide additional background information before the public hearing on July 21. A. Update on CRWOCB Action re July 1998 Newport Beach Spill. The Regional Board today issued Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 as a result of the spill in Newport Beach in July 1998. A copy was provided to the Directors. Bob Ghirelli explained that our concems were addressed in the letter and the waiver, which if signed by August 6 would eliminate the District's right to contest the decision. The complaint charges the District with strict liability and levies a fine of$50,000. The Board would accept a payment of$10,000 and suspend $40,000 if a flow mitigation project, such as the one underway at the Newport Dunes, was completed. This was the decision of the Executive Director and did not require Regional Board consideration. Staff was directed to prepare a cover letter to accompany the waiver and to continue to meet with the Executive Director in an effort to provide additional protection against future claims. Staff will provide a status report to the Directors at future meetings. S. Status Report re Park Place—Michelson Pump Station. General Manager McIntyre reported on a meeting held this week with CWDLP legal staff on the connection fee matter. A fax was received prior to the meeting with additional demands. General Counsel wanted to review the documents cited in the letter. He also discussed the permit history for the parcel, which began when the Fluor Corporation originally developed it. The letter also included a proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Tolling Agreement. Staff was directed to develop a position paper and present it to the Steering Committee. Y ' Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 3 June 23, 1999 Blake Anderson reported on the $1.8 billion State Water Bond scheduled to be presented to voters in March 2000. Previous water bond issues did not provide much funding for projects that would benefit Orange County, and the Directors said that to make it worthy of support they would like to see specific Orange County projects earmarked in the bond. Blake reported that the SAWPA Executive Director is sponsoring the SAWPA plan, which would provide$430 million for projects that would provide direct improvement to the water resources throughout Orange County. Mr. McIntyre reported that the State budget contains $1.2 million of tax refund for Orange County special districts. At this time, the amount to be returned to the District is not known. The due diligence on Kem/King County property is taking longer than expected. A report will be presented to the Committees and the Board in September, and the impacts of the revised biosolids ordinance on operating the land as a biosolids disposal site will be included. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Organization Restructuring. Gary Streed explained the organizational chart that was included in the Agenda Report was a slide that was presented to the FAHR Committee to help visualize the text portion of the budget, but it was not presented to the other committees. While the proposed changes are included in the budget, no decision will be made to proceed with the changes until the Steering Committee reviews it. This issue will be a regular report at future Steering Committee meetings. B. Budoet Issues Raised at the June 9 1999 FAHR Committee Meeting. Gary Streed explained the changes that will be made to the budget as a result of concems and questions raised at the last FAHR Committee meeting. He also reported that it is his goal to have the 2000-01 budget ready for committee review in May next year. C. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in July. David Ludwin indicated that the Purchasing Contracts and Delegation of Authority resolution will also be presented to the PDC Committee at its July 1 meeting. (9) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair John Collins said that the Saturday workshop on the Strategic Plan was extremely helpful and asked if it could be presented again for those Directors who were unable to attend, either one on one with staff or with a make-up session. Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees ) Meeting Page 4 June 23, 1999 (10) COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES DISCUSSION ITEM A. Jim Herberg reported that the EIR will be released on June 29 and a public hearing is scheduled for July 21. Because there already is a public hearing scheduled for 7 p.m. on the revised connection fee ordinance, staff is requesting that the EIR public hearing be scheduled for 8 p.m. Staff recommended that the regular meeting start at 6,30 to conduct routine business. Chair Debay will poll the Directors at the Board meeting, and if approved, the adjourned meeting will start at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 21, 1999. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that because of comments made at the PAC 2 meeting held last week and recent articles that appeared in the newspapers, she provided the media with the press release on the EIR earlier than scheduled. (11) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY It was moved, seconded and approved to add discussion of labor negotiations with 501 and OCFA and litigation matters to closed session. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for July 21, 1999 at 5 p.m. The Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan will attend to discuss items of mutual interest. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:30 p.m. in Closed Session to discuss labor negotiations and significant exposure of litigation against the District. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of a future Board Meeting will report on the actions when they are approved. At 6:57 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Y Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 5 June 23, 1999 ('IS) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. ubmilte�i e n Tappan Bring Committee Secretary HWp GkWjpVeISiEEPoMG LOMMrtiEEWJunRp ngg Sf MinN ,dw i a �m Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, JULY 7, 1999 - 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on July 7, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Staff Present: James Ferryman, Vice Chair Don Bankhead Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Past Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Jan Debay, Board Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Peter Green Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Joy Neugebauer Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Anna Piercy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Charles E. Sylvia John Swindler, IT Manager Paul Walker Directors Absent: None (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 July 7, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the June 2, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved, as corrected. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair McGuigan reminded the Directors that the committee would be dark for the month of August. Director Peer Swan reported that the Planning, Design and Construction Committee discussed the governance of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee at their last meeting. They will be recommending to the Board in July to continue making a full report to the full Board each month but to include a monthly report to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported that the Court of Appeals had overturned the lower court decision on Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680. He referred to General Counsel's memo that was mailed to the Directors last week for further information. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION The Director of General Services Administration briefly reported on the Y2K fueling plan with the City of Fountain Valley. He also discussed Pickens Fuel Corporation and legislation they are trying to get passed requiring cities to buy natural gas-powered vehicles for police departments. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology briefly discussed a report being prepared by EPA discussing best in class for Y2K preparation that would be distributed nationally. The report will cite Orange County Sanitation District as one of the models for this report. ' Mr. Miles also reported that Congress had passed legislation limiting frivolous lawsuits in connection with Y2K issues. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 July 7, 1999 (10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Operations and Maintenance monthly report was discussed. Director Swan asked that data on Workers Comp be reported on and that the District use Driver to perform evaluation/analysis of safety data. Director Swan recommended using more data graphs and less data tables to capture long term Vends such as five years of safety data and 12 to 15 months of data to see Vends. An explanation of how a goal of 47.5%for wrench time was reached was established and how wrench time is calculated. Also discussed was the fine particulates disposal to the ocean and that at the present flow and BOO discharge the secondary treatment could only be turned down 10 to 15 mgd, which would increase the ocean discharge of fine particulates to about 18,000 metric tans per year, somewhat less than the strategic plan estimates of over 19,000 metric tons. (11) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirelli, reported on the Huntington Beach closure due to high bacteria levels and discussed methods of testing being done by the District, Orange County Healthcare Agency, the City of Huntington Beach, and the State Parks and Recreation Department to determine where the problem was. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, also reported that initially there was very little media coverage of the beach closure. While the Register was first to announce the closure on July 2, the Times, the Huntington Beach Independent, KCAL—Channel 9 News and CNN ran subsequent stories the following week. Mr. Ghirelli briefly updated the Directors on the Kern County issue and reported that the District's recommendation for the purchase of Tule Ranch would be coming forward in September. (12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. o (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-b) a. OMTS99-23: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Enterprise Technologies to provide technical and consulting support for the District's Financial Information System (FIS) end-users, in an amount not to exceed $121,200, for a five-month period beginning August 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. Directors entered into a lengthy discussion about retaining highly- trained and skilled employees, and directed staff to develop a policy with regard to this issue. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 July 7, 1999 b. OMTS99-24: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Supporting a California Water Bond Containing Spec Funding Language for the Santa Ana River and Orange County Projects. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staff's recommendation. (14) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-c) a. OMTS99-25: Water Conservation Cooperative Projects Program Update Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, updated the Directors on this project. b. OMTS99-26: Electricity Energy Conservation in District Wastewater Treatment Plants Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported on this issue. c. OMTS99-27: Data Warehouse Demonstration John Swindler, Information Technology Manager, reported on this issue. (15) CLOSED SESSION Chair McGuigan reported to the Committee the need for a dosed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, in order to add one item needing immediate attention that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816. She reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b), upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to add an item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b), the Committee convened in dosed session at 7:52 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the dosed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken regarding this item. At 8:00 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 July 7, 1999 (16) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT (19) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for September 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., at Plant No. 2. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. Kyl Operations, intenance a Technical Services Committee Secretary H.\wp.dta�genda\OWS\1999Winal \7-7-99 Minutm doc OMITS COMMITTEE Meeting Da a To BE.of Ur. AGENDA REPORT ib:m Number item Number OMTS99-23 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick B. Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Mike Herrera, Information Technology SUBJECT: ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGIES - HELP DESK SUPPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Enterprise Technologies to provide technical and consulting support for the District's Financial Information System (FIS) end-users, in an amount not to exceed $121,200, for a five-month period beginning August 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. SUMMARY The JD Edwards Financial Information System (FIS) has played an integral part in providing District staff the ability to interact within its software capabilities. The Information Technology (IT) department has had in its employment two JD Edwards experts who have provided technical and consulting support to District staff. On June 17, 1999, Danny Evangelista, one of the JD Edwards experts terminated his employment. IT expects to lose the other expert, Ruth Kennedy, who will go on maternity leave for eight months beginning July 8, 1999. Her anticipated return date is March 2000. In order to provide continued technical and consulting support for JD Edwards end- users, Information Technology would like to expand Enterprise Technologies' existing Help Desk role for a five month period from approximately 8/1/99 to 12/31/99. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff is recommending utilizing the two consultants for a period of 22 weeks as follows: Item Rate HoursM/eek Number of Weeks Total Mario Alvarado $125/hour 24 22 $ 66,000 Michael Martinez $100/hour 16 22 $ 35,200 Contingency —20% n/a n/a 2$ 0,000 Total $121,200 \YVEmWab1 WplbWpsgelBoeN rae^ee RaW6\t Wd BnM/peMa ReWrY'O]YWMn\�Itrab R. erp9s Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT 1 ® This item has been budgeted. (99-00 JO Other Professional Services) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Duties In general, all duties are Help Desk-related but may include additional tasks and responsibilities as directed by Information Technology staff. The following is a non- exhaustive list of typical tasks: JD Edwards Software Tasks • World and One World configuration and administration—ensure that these products are functioning for user access. • Customization of modules per department specifications. Upgrade of World and One World software as needed. • Assist in testing software in a development environment, and migrate upgraded software into production environment. • Change/add/delete users. • Set up users to access World and/or One World software from workstations. • Deployment of software on user workstations. • Create reports for users as needed using World Writer or modifying canned Dream Writers per user specifications. • Assist users in becoming familiar with functions within World and One World. • Account Number access for user's submitting requisitions. • Setup approval route codes for authorization of requisitions. • Provide Help Desk support with all aspects pertaining to the AS400, JD Edwards software, and third party software on the AS400. AS/400 Tasks • Backup and restore functions, tape management. • Hardware support - disk management, modem support. • Hardware upgrade/changes as needed. • Software support— PTF installation, O/S support, maintenance, upgrades. • Third party software support, maintenance, administration — Oracle gateway, DBU software, Showcase Strategy, Netsoft software. • AS400 administration—user management, print functions, performance monitoring, TCP/IP connectivity. • Troubleshoot any problems with the hardware and software. General • Provide guidance and advice for Y21K testing. • Create and present knowledge transfer sessions. \NEmVahlY Eybpsga Mr ends flegK11 Wd Byrd N. Rep N`O1BdJlen 19�q.dR flnieN. BaBSB Page 2 ,d ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS �wao�emn e.e�t+ame.ao.n nm"RepmnMM man Axna Re ftWMe tic)ee: R> , Page 3 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeeng Dare To 8d.of Mr. 7/7/99 7/21/099 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMI599-24 Brill Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Originator: James Colston, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring SUBJECT: Resolution of Support for Proposed California Water Bond Initiative Provided That The Initiative Contains Funding for Local Projects GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-13, Supporting A California Water Bond Containing Specific Funding Language Designated for Santa Ana River and Orange County Projects SUMMARY On June 23, 1999, the District's Steering Committee heard a presentation regarding the proposed California water bond. If adopted by the legislature and Governor, the bond issue would be considered by the State's voters during the March 2000 primary election. As currently drafted the initiative would provide nearly $2 billion for water related activities in the form of loans and grants. The final version of the bill may be different depending upon the outcome of future negotiations in the Legislature. In the present version of the Bill monies are assigned to project categories. Specific projects or regions are not enumerated. In order to assure that funds are available for local projects specific language should be provided in the bill. There is ample opportunity for specific language to be added to the Bill, either on the floors of the two houses or in conference committee. Local agencies have developed a list of local projects to be included in the bond initiative. These projects include $63 million for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR). The Steering Committee recommended that the Board support the legislation provided that it includes funding for proposed Santa Ana River Watershed projects. A resolution of support is attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A 1YaeonbaYlMym uvMm�ewie npmaa RepomnevB Bono Rge^m Re, WB4 —ta(e)ea R�,.�. Brxiae Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Local Agencies are working to include $430 million to a proposed State water bond tentatively scheduled to be considered by the State's voters in the March 2000 primary election. These monies would be used for local projects including the GWR, Newport Bay wetlands improvement, Arundo donax removal in the Santa Ana River, flood control grants in the dairy area, Prado wetlands improvement, and groundwater desalting and conjunctive use in the upper basin. Because these projects will support the GWR and reduce southern California's dependence on imported water, the General Manager recommends adoption of the attached resolution in support of the water bond with the local projects included in the bond issue. The Water Advisory Committee of Orange County, Orange County Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, and the Orange County Board of Supervisors have taken positions of support for the Water Bond. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS See attached resolution: Supporting A California Water Bond Containing Specific Funding Language Designated for Santa Ana River and Orange County Projects �meonw.�tw,vanoa�a.awb pe.aa Repwn��eBc Bsm names Re�RNt6PM1wn tMal� RmiseO. YN9B Page 2 V RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-13 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SUPPORTING A CALIFORNIA WATER BOND CONTAINING SPECIFIC FUNDING LANGUAGE FOR THE SANTA ANA RIVER AND ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTS WHEREAS, the water resources of California are limited and a great need exists for additional water recycling and storage; and WHEREAS, the CALFED process and the Colorado River 4.4 Plan may limit the availability of water imports to southern California during dry years; and the population in the Orange County Sanitation District's service area is projected to grow by 800,000 new residents by the year 2020; and WHEREAS, agencies within the Santa Ana River Watershed have proposed programs that will provide basin water banking to store groundwater, thereby reducing dependence on imported water and surface storage facilities; and provide contaminant removal and cleanup of water needed for recharge or direct use thereby creating additional annual water supply by using reclamation and groundwater desalting in Orange County and other basins in the watershed; and WHEREAS, these programs will also provide watershed restoration benefiting water supply and water quality, while improving habitat in the watershed and alleviating impacts of significant native habitat loss, wetlands, and open space due to urban development and non-native plant species such as Arundo donax, and WHEREAS these programs will also provide water conservation and efficiency to decrease dependence on water imported into the watershed by funding projects that implement best management practices to conserve valuable water resources; and WHEREAS, these programs will provide flood control and management to solve flooding and drainage problems in areas of heavy agriculture that have endangered livestock and property, degraded surface waters, impacted threatened and endangered species, and impaired beneficial uses; and WHEREAS, these programs will require significant capital funds from general obligation bonds, loans, grants or other local, state and federal funds to provide funding for coordinated water supply, water quality, and habitat improvement projects in the Santa Ana Watershed; and WHEREAS, the California Legislature has begun preparing and will soon begin deliberations on a Bill preliminarily titled the Costa-Machado Safe, Clean; Reliable, 1 9 Water Supply and Flood Protection Act intended for the March 2000 primary election ballot; and WHEREAS, the draft Bill contains language to provide funding for safe drinking water protection, flood protection in the Bay Delta, watershed protection, non-point source controls, water recycling, agricultural water conservation, groundwater recharge facilities, and water system rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District supports these coordinated programs in the Santa Ana River Watershed and Orange County and supports the activities required to pursue funding for these projects from multiple sources including the aforementioned Bill. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Section 1. That the Orange County Sanitation District encourages the Legislature and the Governor to place a water bond on the March 2000 ballot that provides funding for projects to improve southern California's water reliability; provided that funding from the water bond should be apportioned between northern and southern California based upon the state population; and further provided that projects benefiting Orange County and the Santa Ana River Watershed should be specifically named and funded therein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 21, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H1wp.Ma�dminlBSVt Ulom:1199910=99.13.dw 2 Y DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, July 1, 1999, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, July 1, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. A tour of the odor control scrubbers preceded the business portion of the meeting to look at what would be involved in the tagging process for J42 (Agenda Item 13A.). (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Past Chair Bob Dolan, Director of Operations & Lynn Daucher Maintenance Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Jack Mauller Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Russell Patterson Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Directors Absent: Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Christina Shea Simon Watson, Maintenance Supervisor Bob Chenowith, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Lee Badertscher, Lee & Ro Dennis Kasper, Parsons Engineering Science Don Greek, DGA Consultants (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. u PDC Committee Minutes V Page 2 July 1, 1999 (3) PUBLICCOMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the June 3, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the issue of compensation for Directors has been included in Senate Bill 61, which is currently in the Assemblys Local Government Committee. There appears to be no opposition at this time. The members' recommendation that the number of compensated meetings be increased from 6 to 10 will be forwarded to the FAHR Committee for future consideration. The Appellate Court reversed the Sangennano decision. Bob Ghirelli reported that a portion of Huntington Beach Stale Beach Park, between Brookhurst and Newland, has been Gosed by the Orange County Health Care Agency because of high bacterial counts. Preliminary testing points to raw sewage. Staff is unsure where the source may be. The OCSD lines in the area will be televised beginning Wednesday, July 7. There are also twelve restrooms in the Gosed section and those lines will also be checked. Local sewer lines on the other side of Pacific Coast Highway will also be checked. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported that a recommendation for support of the State Water Bond is going through the OMTS Committee. Several cities within the District's service area have already passed resolutions of support. Staff is recommending support with some language including specific projects in Orange County. Director Debay mentioned that there is a CASA meeting scheduled for August 11-14 in San Diego and recommended that the Directors attend if at all possible. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 July 1, 1999 (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering Dave Ludwin reported that a purchase order has been issued for the standby generation equipment for the headworks. The schedule calls for delivery in October and on- line December 1. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL There was no report. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (11) QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSAs AND ADDENDA The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly PSAs and Addenda Report. There were no PSAs and five addenda this past quarter. (12) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTMTY The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly Report on task orders that were issued and announced that contracts were renewed with five firms for the next year. This program has been very successful and effective over the past year. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. PDC 99-35 Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-XX, A Resolution of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchasing Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98,43 After a presentation by Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, and discussion, it was moved, seconded and approved (5 yeas, 4 nos). However, the Committee members asked that case studies be prepared showing the process (flow chart) and follow-up for oversight, and re-agendize for the September PDC Committee meeting. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 July 1, 1999 b. PDC 99-36 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratty Change Order 3 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$110,944 and 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,461,765. c. PDC 99-37 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Amendment No. 3 in the amount of$257,648 to the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for the Relocation and Modification to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for construction costs; and (2)Approve a budget increase of $176,786 for the Relocation and Modifications to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Paeific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for added construction costs, for a total revised project budget of$2,302,666. d. PDC 99-38 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional miscellaneous services in the amount of$80,537, for a total amount not to exceed $4,480,437; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-41, providing for tagging services in the amount of $616,393, for a total amount not to exceed $5,096,830. (14) INFORMATION ITEMS a. Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Program Elements, Governance and Other Issues Staff asked for direction on what additional information should be presented to the Directors to help them make informed decisions on the GWR System project. The issues of concern appear to be form of governance, status of the health risk assessment, economics and cash flow, and providing updates on the various elements to the PDC Committee and at the Board meetings. Staff will add a routine item to the PDC Committee agenda to provide a status report on the project and discussion points of interest. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 July 1, 1999 (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Staff will add the GWR System Program as a routine report/discussion item to all future agendas. (19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The PDC Committee will not meet in August. The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 2 at 5 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: n Tappan Committee Secretary H.'Np,calage TDCTDC99199MINS070199 mfnu .dw PDC COMMITTEE "� D1e TOB° °ra` /1Z tlzr/� AGENDA REPORT Hem Num HemNum� Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Manager SUBJECT: ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 7-17 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$110,944 and 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,461,765. SUMMARY Change Order No. 3 includes five items of added work to Contract No. 7-17. There is a 17 calendar-day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per calendar day and there are no bonus provisions. This change order is for Board approval as the amount exceeds the General Manager and PDC Committee approval authority. Contract Start Date August 21, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date April 27, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date May 24, 1999 Actual Completion Date NIA Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $1,317,530. Previous Authorized Changes 33,291. This Change (Add) 110.944. Change Orders to Date 144,235. Percentage Increase 10.95% Amended Contract Price $1,461,765. BUDGETIMPACT � r ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 5, Item b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 7-17, Orange Park Acres Trunk Sewer Replacement, consists of the construction of a new gravity sewer with manholes and upgrading the existing 12-inch sewer to a 21-inch sewer from Orange Park Boulevard to 400-feet beyond Meads Avenue. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The contract is 100% complete. The construction contract was awarded to Fleming Engineering Inc. in August 1998. The following table summarizes the Change Order: ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Eliminate bore and open cut for $15,192 1 Design Change pipe replacement. 2 Protect the 2-inch gas line 14, 576 2 Changed Condition adjacent to the new sewer line. 3 Replace two 24-inch corrugated 5,030 0 Changed Condition metal pipe storm drains. 4 Recompaction of cave-in area 65,211 14 Changed Condition ad acent to new sewer line. 5 Additional width and thickness of 10,935 0 Changed Condition asphalt pavement. TOTAL — Change Order No. 3 1 $110,944 17 All of the items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. See the attached change order for more information. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. H1wp.dta\agenda%Board Agenda Reports11999 Board Agenda Reports`D799Vten,14(c).doc ATTACHMENTS 1 Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order SK:Ic HAwpAte'agendatBoerd Agenda RepartsN 999 Board Agenda ReportsZ799Wem Nc),doc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7-17 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - $ Design Staff $ 9,6131 $ 9.600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 100% Consultant PSA $ 23,968 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 $ 36,660 100% Construction Contract $ 702.000 $ 1,350.821 $ 110,944 $ 1.461,765 $ 1.350,821 $ 110,944 $ 1,461,765 $ 1,306,788 89% LConstmction $ $ $ 38,400 $ 168,210 $ 8,965 $ 177.175 $ 168,210 $ 8,965 $ 177.175 $ 177,175 100% $ 119,909 $ (119,909) $ - $$ 773.968 $ 1.685.200 $ - $ 1,685.200 $ 1,565.291 $ 119,909 $ 1,685.200 $ 1,530,223 91% budgeebl-CO#3 Pagel CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT ORANGE PARK ACRES TRUNK REPLACEMENT CONTRACT NO. 7.17 ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS( CONTRACT 8/21198 $ 1,317,530.00 $ 1,317,530.00 0.00% 250 250 CO NO. 1' 3110199 $ 33,291.00 $ 1,350,821.00 2.53% 10 260 CO NO. 2` 8/8/99 1,350,821.00 2.53°/ 0 260 CO NO. 3 PENDING $ 110,944.00 $ 1,461,765.00 10.95% 17 277 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Flemina Engineering, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: July 21, 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(9eduGt) $110.944.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ELIMINATE BORE AND OPEN CUT FOR PIPE PLACEMENT This item compensates the Contractor for open cutting and placing 30 linear feet of 21-inch Vitrified Clay Pipe in lieu of 30 linear feet of 36-inch steel casing bore shown on the contract drawings. Existing abutment piles for the OCEMA Bridge were too closely spaced to allow boring to place a 36-inch steel casing. As a result Bid Item No. 5 in the amount of$33,000 will be deleted from the contract in the Adjustment of Engineers Quantities. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 717-2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,192.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - PROTECT THE 2-INCH GAS LINE ADJACENT TO THE NEW SEWER LINE This item compensates the Contractor for protecting the 2-inch gas line running parallel to the new sewer line where it falls within the trench from Station 62+81 to Station 69+70. The original contract drawings show the gas line eight-feet to the right and parallel to the new sewer. The actual gas line alignment crossed over the new pipeline in several locations between the stations above. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 717-2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,576.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - REPLACE TWO 24-INCH CMP STORM DRAINS This item compensates the Contractor for removing and replacing two 24-inch CMP stone drains crossing the sewer trench at Station 72+10. Replacement was necessary because the bottom half of the corrugated metal pipes were deteriorated beyond salvage. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(3) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 717-5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,030.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Flemino Enoineerina. Ine, C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: July 21, 1999 Job: Oranae Park Acres Trunk Replacement, Contract No. 7-17 ITEM 4- RECOMPACTION OF CAVE-IN AREAS ADJACENT TO NEW SEWER LINE This item compensates the Contractor for replacement and recompaction of poorly compacted backfll over the existing sewer pipe (owned by the City of Orange) running parallel to the new sewer installation from Station 55+00 to Station 61+00 and 69+70 to 71+90. During the pipeline excavation, the right trench wall remained upright while the left trench wall caved-in. The Contractor investigated and found very low consolidation of the back(II material over the existing sewer line. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8) of the General Provisions. (Reference General Provisions Section 21-3400, Foundation in Poor Soil) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $65.211.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 5-ADDITIONAL WIDTH AND THICKNESS OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT This item compensates the Contractor for the increase in asphalt pavement thickness and extended width of the pavement on portions of Randall Street and Meads Avenue. The County permit required the asphalt replacement thickness to match the existing A.C. plus 1-inch. The detailed specifications show existing A.C. pavement to be 3-inches thick. The actual thickness varies up to 15-inches in several areas. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference Detailed Specification Sections 111 and 112) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,935.00 TIME EXTENSIONS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $110,944.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 17 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: July 21. 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement Contract No. 7-17 The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 17 calendar day extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 21, 1998 Original Contract Time: 250 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: April 27, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 17 Calendar Day Total Contract Time Extension: 27 Calendar Day Revised Contract Time: 277 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 24, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,317,530.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 33,291.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 110,944.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,461,765.00 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: July 21 1999 Job: Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement Contract No. 7-17 Board Authorization Date: July 21, 1999 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Memng Date Tn 11ill:r. mro9 nxr/99 AGENDA REPORT Mm Number 1O Number PDC99.37 19(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: RELOCATION AND MODIFICATIONS TO SEWERS FOR THE WIDENING OF NEWPORT BOULEVARD AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 5-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Amendment No. 3 in the amount of$257,648 to the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach for the Relocation and Modification to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for construction costs: and (2)Approve a budget increase of$176,786, for the Relocation of Modifications to Sewers, for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Contract No. 5-41, for added construction costs, for a total revised project budget of$2,302,666. SUMMARY The City of Newport Beach (City) and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) entered into a Reimbursement Agreement on December 18, 1996, for Revenue Area Nos. 5 and 6. The Reimbursement Agreement is to pay the City for design engineering, city administration, construction management and construction costs to relocate existing OCSD sewer facilities. Relocation of sewer facilities was required because of the construction of the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Newport Arches Bridge Widening project. There have been two other Amendments to this project. Amendment No. 1 and No. 2 was approved at the Board meeting on June 24, 1998. Amendment No. 3 for$257,648 is for 7 items of additional change order work associated with the work. The net budget increase of$176.786 is needed for OCSD design and construction staff costs and increase construction costs in addition to the available contingency money. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Amendment No. 3 is to add $257,648 to the agreement with the City for a total agreement of$1,925,141. Summary of Reimbursement Amounts Initial Agreement $397,540 Amendment No. 1 $466.650 Amendment No. 2 $803,303 Amendment No. 3 $257,648 Total Agreement Amount $1.925.141 NYgepl�pMtlrVbd�pxW Fryu4\Ippe BwN ApwMa NpaWO)YPWn H(d)_Js Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1998-99 Budget, Zane 5, Line C,current budget is$2.125,880.00) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 3 in the amount of$257,648, for additional construction change orders for Revenue Area's No. 5 and 6. Staff recommends a total net budget increase in the amount of$176,786, which includes: $30,250 to OCSD staff design costs, $38,475 to OCSD construction management funds and $257,648 for Amendment No. 3 less contingency funds of$86,760 for Revenue Area No. 6, and $62,827 for Revenue Area No. 5 for added construction costs. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Amendment No. 3 provides additional funds to install a blow-off manhole with piping and the relocation of existing OCSD sewer facilities and miscellaneous change order items on Pacific Coast Highway due to the added construction of a box culvert drainage project for Caltrans. This work was added by Caltrans and installed at this time, at the request of the City so that Pacific Coast Highway would not have to be reopened in the future. Caltrans wanted the box culvert drainage project to be completed and operable before the upcoming winter season begins. This will now close out this project. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives. Amendment No. 3 must be approved to finish relocating District sewer facilities before the State of California and Department of Transportation box culvert drainage project and the widening of the Newport Arches Bridge is completed. Work is already authorized and commenced by the City. CEQA FINDINGS The City is administering CEQA procedures as part of the intersection improvement project. ATTACHMENT Budget Information Table RLC:jak H:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\1999 Board Agenda Reports\0799\Item 14(d).doc .M pllpeMYAVN Ap,...e IIM By./g .Pe{chlp]%M,n NW . R.,e.a. � Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Relocation and Modifications to Sewers for the Widening of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway Contract No. 5.41 AMENDMENT NO. 3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED [REVENUE JECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) AREA 6 MSN $ 18.000.00 $ 58,191.00 $ 58,191.00 $ 58.191.00 $ 58.191.00 0% UE AREA 5 N(MSN) $ 9.540.00 $ 38.643.00 $ 38,643.00 $ 38,643.00 $ 38,643.00 0% OCSD STAFF DESIGN 1 $ 22,500.00 $ 135,60D.00 $ 30.250.00 $ 165,850.00 S 135.600.00 $ 30.250.00 $ 165,850.00 $ 134,257 81% OCSD STAFF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $ 32,500.00 $ 153.200.00 $ 38,475.00 $ 191,675.00 $ 153.200.00 $ 38,475.00 $ 191,675.00 $ 151,468 79% CITY OF NEWPORT ADMINISTRATION 1 $ 20.000.00 $ 94,793.00 $ 94.793.00 $ 94,793.00 $ 94.793.00 0% REVENUE AREA 6 CONSTRUCTION $ 210,000.00 $ 863,002.00 $ 149.435.00 $ 1,012,437.00 $ 863.002.00 $ 149.435.00 $ 1,012,437.00 $ 214.600 21% REVENUE AREA 5 CONSTRUCTION $ 160.000.00 $ 632.864.00 $ 108.213.00 $ 741.077.00 $ 632.864.00 $ 108,213.00 $ 741.077.00 $ 155,400 21% REV.AREA 6 OCSD DESIGNICONST. CONTINGENCY $ 86,760.00 $ 86,760.00 $ 0% REV.AREA 5 OCSD DESIGN/CONST. CONTINGENCY $ 62.827.00 $ 62.827.00 $ 0% TOTAL $ 472.540.00 1 $ 2,125,880.00 $ 176,786.00 $ 2,302,666.00 $ 1,976,293.00 $ 326,373.00 $ 2,302,666.00 1 $ 655,725 28% H9wpdUbn9WMS 8 CD TRACTSW1V�1budgeUEle3.vblDleiticU PDC COMMITTEE Me ngoi[! roaa.aw. 7/r/9a 7/C2rNa AGENDA REPORT """""nW Hemr bw ror99-38 14(U Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jonathan K Thomsic, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NO. 2 AND ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE PLANT AUTOMATION & REINVENTION PROJECT, JOB NUMBER J42 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation & Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42 providing for additional miscellaneous services in the amount of$80,537, for a total amount not to exceed $4,480,437. and (2) Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science for Plant Automation & Reinvention Project, Job No. JA2 providing for tagging services in the amount of$616,393 for a total amount not to exceed $5,096,830. SUMMARY Addendum No. 2, Additional Miscellaneous Services Jab Number J-42 is the Plant Automation & Reinvention Project. Phase 1 consists of extensive plant control system documentation culminating in a series of eight reinvention workshops. The contract with the workshop facilitator is to be extended to cover the remaining seven reinvention workshops in Phase 1. Five other unanticipated, additional tasks have been identified in the course of work on the project. The cost of the unanticipated work is $80,537. Contingency funds within the existing project budget will be used to complete this work. Addendum No. 3. Plant Tagging Services An essential element of asset management is consistent, unique instrument and equipment identification. Currently several independent identification schemes coexist in the plants. Many instruments and equipment items are not identified in the field. This addendum will synchronize all the identification databases by creating a single, permanent identification number. It will mark approximately 37,000 field items with the new identification number. The need for consistent tags was recognized during the contract negotiations with Parsons and was added to the scope of work subsequent to the receipt of proposals. The scope and cost for tagging was initially negotiated into the contract. The tagging clauses were stripped out of the contract when Parsons and the Board reverted to the original contract price and scope of work during the award of the original contract. M M'plY\p ,W19, N/p,C fle{a6Nppp BiWC ApNd�RRpoN`O)ORllem l�l�ra: R. Page 1 Five tasks have been identified to accomplish this work. The cost for plant tagging services is $988,393, consisting of$372,000 in Staff costs and $616,393 in Consultant costs. Contingency funds within the existing project budget will be used to complete this work. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE. There are two entries in the ADDENDUM 3 to JOB J-42 table; $372,000 in Design and $616,393 in Consultant PSA. The Design dollars will fund internal CMMS labor for reconciliation. The Consultant PSA dollars will fund field work to install the tags. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: CAA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Addendum No. 2, Additional Miscellaneous Services Six unanticipated tasks have been identified in the course of work on J-42, the Plant Automation & Reinvention Project: Professional Facilitator The original J-42 contract funded the first workshop (Workshop 1) for each of eight process areas. The workshops are brainstorming sessions designed to identify automation and reinvention projects. The brainstorming process is attended by about 40 District personnel from Operations, Maintenance, Information Technology, and Engineering. Original consultant proposals suggested the use of a professional facilitator to optimize the workshop working environment. Using a facilitator to expedite the meeting will reduce workshop costs by reducing the number of hours for the District personnel involved in the workshop. Workshop 1, for the preliminary area, utilized a facilitator authorized by the General Manager as Addendum 1. The consensus opinion of those that attended was that the facilitator reduced costs while enhancing the quality of the workshop. The Parsons contract does not include the service of this facilitator for the remaining seven workshops. This addendum provides funds for a facilitator for each of the remaining seven Workshop Vs. The facilitator was selected by a three-member team consisting of a training supervisor, the District project manager, and the Parsons project manager. The detailed Scope of Work is included as an attachment to this agenda report. The cost for the facilitator is $64,239. X by.ebbpxqBaN�p�M RgerR1B%Bw,C Rpxtl RWabW)Wlbm 1�1)%� R . vioae Page 2 Drawing Database Modifications The existing Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) is incompatible with the J42 drawing database. The drawing numbers used in the selected software need to be modified to fit into the CMMS database. The cost for this work is $3,438. Drawing Connector Modifications "Drawing connectors" are pointers from a pipe on one drawing to its continuation on another drawing. The normal format for the drawing connectors is a unique, serial number. These numbers must be kept in a table so the number is not inadvertently reused. The table is difficult to use and is subject to many errors. A drawing connector scheme using drawing numbers instead of unique serial numbers allows "self-naming" drawing connectors; a table is not needed. The use of self-naming drawing connectors will result in shorter drawing times coupled with a dramatic increase in accuracy. Parsons must modify the drawing program to use drawing numbers instead of unique serial numbers to solve this problem. Total cost to modify the existing drawing connector scheme and revise the existing drawing connectors is $1,656. Reimbursement For Delays Due To Hardware And Software Problems Parsons incurred additional work and overtime costs resulting from delays arising from District software and hardware problems. The total cost of recovery from hardware and software problems is $6,742. Parsons will be reimbursed for costs totaling $5,542; SFI (Strategic Frameworks, Inc.) will be reimbursed for costs totaling $1,200. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) QA/QC includes work with the workshop 1 facilitator to develop the agenda and content of the seven remaining workshops and quality review of the other tasks listed above. The cost for additional QA/QC is $728. Project Management The Project Management task includes creation of a contract for the Workshop facilitator and management of the other tasks listed above. The cost for additional project management is $2,214. Fee The fee for this portion of the project is calculated at 10% of the addendum value and is $1,520. N xpem\.p.w�b iye^m aew++\lwe mob yewcneeoaelown.m 1�(el me Ne „ Page 3 The total cost of the unanticipated work is$80,537. Contingency funds within the existing project budget will be used to complete this work. Following is a summary table showing the tasks to be performed with the associated cost: Item Description Cost 1. A professional facilitator is needed to expedite the first $64,239 workshop for each of the remaining seven process areas 2. The drawing database must be modified to $3,438 accommodate the Computerized Maintenance Management System 3. The drawing connectors must be modified to expedite $1,656 drawing page cross-references 4. The Consultant must be reimbursed for cumulative work $6,742 delays due to hardware and software startup problems 5. Quality Control/Quality Assurance is required for $728 activities 1 through 4 6. Project Management is required to support activities 1 $2,214 th row h 5 Fee at 10% $1,520 TOTAL: $80,537 Addendum No. 3. Plant Tagging Services An essential element of asset management is consistent, unique instrument and equipment tags. The same identifier needs to be used in the field, in the process control databases, by all documentation, and in the asset management database. The District has allowed several independent identification systems to coexist. Consequently, there are at least six different identifiers used for an instrument or equipment item. Many instruments and equipment items are not identified at all in the field. A universal, permanent instrument and equipment tag number used consistently in all databases and on all equipment is one goal of Job No. J-42, the Plant Reinvention/Automation Project. There are several cost savings associated with universal instrument and equipment tags: 1. Permanent tags reduce mistakes when identifying items for repair or replacement. 2. LOCKOUT/TAGOUT procedures can refer to the permanent tag instead of lengthy descriptions, reducing procedure time and increasing safety. 3. SCADA alarms can refer to specific permanent tags reducing the time required to locate the device. 4. Permanent tags are required to reap the benefits of asset management to minimize asset life costs. H My Pa�IgenOe Pe IIM po •peMepepneMWLm 1e(e�0i pemef: � Page 4 5. Permanent tags reduce the design costs associated with upgrading, modifying or demolishing an asset. The need for consistent tags was recognized during the contract negotiations with Parsons and was added to the scope of work subsequent to the receipt of proposals. The scope and cost for tagging was initially negotiated into the contract. The tagging clauses were stripped out of the contract when Parsons and the Board reverted to the original contract price and scope of work during the award of the original contract. Ajoint OCSD/Consultant effort is required to complete the permanent tagging of instrumentation and equipment for the treatment plants. As part of the original contract, Parsons will deliver to the District permanent tag assignments for instruments and equipment. Five tasks are required to complete the instrument and equipment tagging for both treatment plants, as follows, Initial Meetings. Workshop and Procedures Parsons will conduct a series of 4 to 6 meetings with the District to create specific written procedures for the tagging effort. Parsons will develop tagging criteria, methods for interfacing with the CMMS, select appropriate tag material and mounting, and address information change management. The cost for the initial meetings, workshops and procedures is $35,818 for Parsons and $48,920 for District labor. The total cost for the initial effort is $84,738. CMMS Database Analysis The CMMS group will receive initial permanent tag number assignments from Parsons. The group will "reconcile"the information gathered in the plant with their own records. Parsons will provide additional information as required to support the CMMS effort. The reconciled information will be fed to Parsons to generate the permanent field tags. The cost for the CMMS database analysis with reconciliation is $323,080 and consists of District labor only. Purchase/Prepare Tags Parsons will check each of the field instruments and equipment to determine the type of tag required. Parsons will order the tags and prepare them for final installation. The cost to purchase and prepare the tags is $62,241 for labor and $83,090 for materials. Install Taos Parsons will install the tags on the proper instruments and equipment. Parsons will remove all existing temporary and superceded tags. Parsons will retag instruments and equipment that are changed during the course of the contract. The cost for installing tags is $346,794. H1 ft4genGWcaitl Ap ReW %1B gm Agenda ReWftWMN M1<(e(.0% Rmi . aao,,,g Page 5 Installation Documentation Parsons will conform and update the CMMS information to reflect the actual installations. Parsons will prepare a list of the new tag numbers with all of the existing numbers for future cross-reference. The cost of the installation documentation is $42,182. The quantity of tags is estimated at 37,000. The not-to-exceed cost of Parsons tagging services is $616,393. The estimated District labor cost is $372,000. The total cost is $988,393. Staff has created an independent plan with cost estimate for this project. The Staff plan assumed the District would hire temporary help to supplement District personnel. The Staff plan cost estimate was $59,681 (7.5%) less than the Parsons proposal but required a longer schedule with a significant District labor commitment of 4,033 hours. The plan was rejected because the District does not have the necessary additional labor resources. Following is a summary table showing the tasks to be performed with the associated cost: Item Description Parson $$ OCSD $$ 1. District and Parsons will create procedures, 35,818 48.920 conduct meetings and hold workshops to establish the nature of the work and of the identification numbers 2. District staff will receive permanent tag 0 323,080 numbers from Parsons and reconcile the internal databases 3. Parsons will investigate field conditions, 62,241 0 prepare special tags and field tag packages 4. Parsons will install the tags 346,794 0 5. District and Parsons will remove superceded 42.182 0 tags and finalize the effort 6. Stainless steel tags, a tag production 83,090 0 machine, and miscellaneous other direct costs will be purchased Fee at 9.5% 46,268 0 TOTAL: $616,393 $372,000 GRAND TOTAL: $988,393 ALTERNATIVES Addendum No. 2. Additional Miscellaneous Services All alternatives result in higher costs and/or are not feasible. H'..y.n.Wega�beae.ea Reo %IMacne Aqe Reoubneeanem,a(e)ax R...e: aaaaa Page 6 Addendum No. 3. Plant Tagging Services One alternative is to continue the present practice of inconsistent identification coupled with diverse identification systems. It will become more difficult to identify field equipment and correlate database entries as District information management becomes more detailed. Asset management will be more complicated and subject to error without a permanent identifications system. The District will not reap efficiencies from rapid equipment identification. CEQA FINDINGS Both addenda are exempt from CEQA requirements per CEQA Section 15262. ATTACHMENTS PSA Status Report Budget Information Table for Addendum 2 Budget Information Table for Addendum 3 JKT:jo:jak MeanWemlM9Jh1sYaNel9wN belle HeMeeiM B NAg.M Re V]BBUIen le(e)Gx q,,,e, arm Page 7 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-42 Plant Reinvention/Automation Project Total Project Budget: $25,760,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 27, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs J-42 is the Plant Reinvention and Automation Project that will Original increase plant automation to an optimum level. It is a capital 5/27/98 PSA project that will implement physical changes to the plant process $4,383,400 $4,383,400 control systems and equipment to support both Operations and Maintenance 4/1199 1 Provide facilitator for Area 10/20 Workshop 1 $16,500 $4,399,900 Pending 2 Additional Miscellaneous Services $80,537 $4,480.437 Pending 3 Plant Tagging Services $616,393 $5,096,830 4 5 N lxy.GGbBeMdlB�uN A,-d.R.1 11 BBBB Hft-d.R.I.W .B 1e1.)Oac Raird: P/1N BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT REINVENTION I AUTOMATION PROJECT ADDENDUM 2 to JOB J-42 PROJECT ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED /TASK AUTHOR- PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOR- AUTHOR- TOTAL EXPEND- EXPENDED IZED BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET IZED TO IZATION AUTHOR- ITURE TO DATE(%) BUDGET DATE REQUEST IZATION TO DATE Project $185,180 $185,180 $185,180 $185,180 $185,180 $151,773 82% Development Design $2,961,531 $2.961,531 $2,961,531 $2,961,531 $2,961,531 $305,253 10% Staff Consultant $4,383,400 $4,399.900 S80,537 $4,480,437 $4,399,900 $80,537 S4,480,437 $1.005,954 22% PSA Construction $8,696,472 $8,696,472 $8.696,472 0% Contract Construction $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 0% (Other) Construction $4,030,000 $4,030,000 $4,030,000 0% Staff Contingency $4,903,417 $4,886,917 $(80,537) $4,8061380 TOTAL $25,760,000 $25,760,000 $25,760,000 $7.546,611 $80,537 $7,627,148 $1.462,980 21% H MygdpwMa`BvrE ApaMa Rapt%IMB MAgx aRapwb`O1B mta(a)goc RerlaM. NA' BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT REINVENTION / AUTOMATION PROJECT ADDENDUM 3 to JOB J-42 PROJECT ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED [TASK AUTHOR- PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOR- AUTHOR- TOTAL EXPEND- EXPENDED IZED BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET IZED TO IZATION AUTHOR- ITURE TO DATE(%) BUDGET DATE REQUEST IZATION TO DATE Project $185,180 $185,180 $185,186 $185,180 $185.180 $151,773 82% Development Design $2,961,531 $2,961.531 $372,000 $3.333.531 $2,961,531 $372,000 $3,333,531 $305,253 8% Staff Consultant $4,383.400 $4,480,437 $616.393 $5.096,830 1 $4,480,437 $616,393 $5,096.830 $1.005.954 20% PSA Construction $8.696,472 $8.696.472 $8,696,472 0% Contract Construction $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 0% (Other) Construction $4,030,000 $4,030,000 $4,030,000 0% Staff Contingency $4.903,417 $4.886,917 S(988,393) $3.898,524 TOTAL $25,760,000 $25,840,537 1 $25,840,537 $7,627,148 $988.393 $8,615,541 1,462.980 20% N 1wp atlao. aaeoa,a na<ne.ae.omnw5 em,e eDeneo R.pomw)emn.m 11"a« FnirM bAl DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND _HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, July 14, 1999, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on July 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Don Hughes Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Gerald Nichols Shawn Boyd Arthur Newsham John M. Gullixson Steve Sheldon Shirley McCracken Russ Behrens Mark A. Murphy Tom Dawes James W. Silva Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Directors Absent: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Mike Peterrnan, Director of Human Resources Jan Debay, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Bob Doter, Director of Operations & Maintenance Mike White, Controller Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor John Swindler, IT Manager Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. OCSD . P.O.Bo[ 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-6127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 June 9, 1999 c (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Russ Behrens spoke to the Directors regarding the on-going issue with Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership and the Michelson Pump Station. He staled he was now representing Crow Winthrop and requested that negotiations be reopened for a possible equitable solution instead of costly litigation. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the June 9, 1999 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting, as corrected and revised. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported on the Huntington Beach closure due to high bacterial counts in the water that began on July 1. Staff has discovered a break in one of the State Beach restroom laterals, which is probably the reason for the bacteria problem. Measures are underway to repair the break but further monitoring is continuing to make sure there are no other breaks. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Anderson reported on a draft resolution regarding water bond issues that was reviewed by the OMITS Committee and would be going to the full Board for adoption. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance stated that the rolling agenda incorrectly noted there would be no November 10, 1999 meeting. At this time the FAHR Committee is still scheduled to meet on November 10, 1999. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, reported there has been a lot of media activity recently. With regard to the Huntington Beach closure, the Register was first to announce the closure on July 2. The Times, the Huntington Beach Independent, KCAL— Channel 9 News and CNN ran subsequent stories the following week. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 June 9, 1999 It was further reported that ABC had interviewed Charlie McGee, Laboratory Supervisor, regarding a paper he had co-authored on organics in the surf zone. Ms. Tuchman then announced the District's booth at the Orange County Fair had received four first-place blue ribbons for Overall Best of Show, Knowledgeable Friendly Personnel, Most Educational and Most Interactive. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Mr. Woodruff advised the Committee that Senator Kelly was authoring a bill with regard to Directors' compensation. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- D) A. FAHR99-51: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of June 1999: The Treasurers Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. B. FAHR99-52: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR99-53: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of June 23, 1999. D. FAHR99-54: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with District's purchasing policies. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A) through 12(D) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- F) A. FAHR99-55: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99- , Authorizing the District's Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest District's Funds; Adopting District's Investment Policy Statement and Performance Benchmarks; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-40. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 June 9, 1999 B. FAHR99-56: Approve agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) in connection with transferring assets and service responsibility for Park Place (Michelson Station) Service Area to IRWD. This item was removed from the agenda by staff without discussion or action. C. FAHR99-57: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts;Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98-43. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to refer this item to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for resolution of their concems and then bring back to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee in September, 1999. D. FAHR99-58: Mr. Art Newsham and Mr. Gerald Nichols addressed the Committee and presented their request and arguments in support of receiving a full waiver of any sewer connection fee for every parcel in the Yorba Linda area that has paid service charges since 1990, even though not connected to the District's system. After considerable discussion among Directors, including a report and opinion from General Counsel, the Committee took the following actions: MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED to recommend to the Board of Directors that the request of the homeowners for a full waiver of connection charges be denied. FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED to recommend to the Board of Directors that it approve, in concept, the District's refund of monies erroneously paid by property owners that were not connected to the District's system, subject to the specific terms, as approved and as described below. FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED to recommend to the Board of Directors that the District also pay to the qualifying property owners, interest at a rate equal to the U.S. Treasury 90-day rate, on the sums to be refunded. FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED to recommend to the Board of Directors that the District provide written notice of an offer to each affected property owner determined to have erroneously paid sewer service charges to the District; that for a period of four(4)years, ending September 1, 2003, the District will, at the election of the property owner, either. (a) refund in cash, plus interest thereon, the amount paid to the District as sewer service charges by the current property owner for the past four(4)years, or the number of years that the current owner has owned the property and paid the charges, whichever is lesser, or(b) apply an amount equal to the total amount of sewer service charges paid for each parcel, plus interest thereon, by all property owners since 1990-91, as a credit against the amount of sewer capital facilities capacity Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 June 9, 1999 charges (connection charges) to be paid to the District at the time of connecting to the District's system. FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED that the Staff be directed to: a) Request an updated listing from the Yorba Linda Water District on property addresses not connected to the local sewer system within Revenue Area No. 2; b) Identify those property owners from this listing whose sewer service fee has not already been removed from the County property tax roll, and contact them for verification of information; c) Remove these addresses from the County property tax roll for future sewer service fee billings after receiving confirmation of no connection from the property owners; d) Implement a method to receive connection information from the City so that properties are reinstated to the tax roll when connected; and, FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED that Staff be directed to develop a program for obtaining information on properly addresses throughout the rest of the District boundaries, except for Revenue Area 14, that are also not connected to the local sewer service system and attempt to verify this information with the property owner for the purpose of removing these properties from the County property tax roll to eliminate future service fee billings. E. FAHR99-59: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-10, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Permittee Charges for Use. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. F. FAHR99-60: 1)Authorize Contracts/ Purchasing Manager to proceed with a pilot procurement card program with selected staff utilizing the American Express procurement card program for a six-month period effective August 1, 1999; and, 2)Authorize the Contracts/ Purchasing Manager to implement a full-scale procurement program if said program suggests benefits of costs savings and staff time. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. However, staff was directed to bring the pilot program results back to the FAHR Committee before proceeding with implementation of a full-scale program. r Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 June 9, 1999 (14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR99-61: Data Warehouse Demonstration No presentation was given on this item. b. FAHR99-62: Groundwater Replenishment System Governance Review Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, gave a brief report on the development and direction of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Gary Streed, Director of Finance, answered Director Shawn Boyd's questions regarding the District's Letter of Credit for the Series A COP issue. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Director Swan requested reports be prepared on several issues, including how the District is financed, letters of credit, budgets, special issues related to Revenue Areas 13 and 14, etc. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for September 8, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 19(A)(1), (2), (3) and (4) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:53 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 7 June 9, 1999 At 8:48 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:48 p.m. Submjtted by: Penny M. l e FAHR Committee Sedetary KAI.ftapaibWNM'NVPoIYOm V714N FAM MM Jz . 1 FAHRCOMMITTEE MeebngDate Tok8d 07/14/99 07/21/99 AGENDA REPORT IRm Number Item Number FAHR99-51 ISM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of June 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) baGMWY1Yry Eb1psW08NN IyxW.Rpx611gy Bu,E�01"W Rpv6D1BiJMn 151Cr0% Page 1 r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of June 1999 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the Distrid's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts June 30, 1999 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $23,115,784 5.1 Union Bank Checking Account 1,012.063 — Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 658.096 4.1 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18,801,279 44 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 301,965.297 4.5 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 10,443 4.9 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,196,605 6.2 Petty Cash 4.400 — TOTAL $377.763,967 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report GGS:SK:lc H:Mq.EbYpanG1F�XTFM,W,YOKNIRBL31.Ox R. 1041w Page 2 District Fund Balanc unuuq ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII muum \\\ \\\\ \\\\ NE®R \\\\ \\\\ ..... ..... >.... :.... :.... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ,.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ;.... ..... ..... ..... :.... ,.... :.... ..... ,.... ,.... :.... ..... :.... ..... ,.... ,.... :.... ;.... ..... ..... ,.... .,... ..... ,.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ,.... ..... ,.... ,.... ..... ,.... ..... ..... ..... ..... >.... ..... :.... ..... ,.... ,.... F : 11 MONTHLY REPORT " - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 June 1999) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PIN $18817,995 Me11onO $18:801,279 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $18,870,532 • Mellon $18,874,584 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of 1%Change: $43,776 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 46% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return (0/9) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.36 0.37 3 Months: 1.15 1.12 12 Months: 5.20 4.71 Year-to-Date: 2.33 2.23 H.L..LFINANCELZ101KOZIKISAMPLELIQ0699..UT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 June 1999) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: ��,{ $302,126,973 Mellon $301,965,297 Historical Cost: • IMCO $307,242,484 • Mellon $307,519,013 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.41 Of Index: 2.40 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $7,373,316 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 16% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 00/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.15 0.29 3 Months: 0.06 0.23 12 Months: 4.97 4.93 Year-to-Date: 0.48 0.64 H.L tFINANCEIIIOIKOZIKLMMPLEL.7D699.RPT OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USDA 30-JUN-1999 HB1300 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD -----------"'---------------- ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,655,253.00 2,655,253.00 13.95% 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN IYR 3,350,799.17 3,350,799.17 17.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2,440,218.06 2,440,218.06 12.82% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 689,080.00 889,080.00 4.67% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 151,289.68 151,289.68 0.79% 0.00 7,022.97 4.64 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,486,639.91 9,486,639.91 49.84% 0.00 7,022.97 0.07 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. AGENCIES 4,698,304.60 4,686,247.00 24.62% -12,057.60 225,945.00 4.82 BANKING a FINANCE 2,409,385.50 2,370,579.00 12.45% -38,806.50 202,250.00 8.53 INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 853,187.50 4.48% -10,565.50 60,562.50 7.30 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 1,416,501.00 1,404,626.00 7.38% -11,875.00 105,700.00 7.53 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 9,387,944.10 9,314,639.50 48.93% -73,304.60 594,457.50 6.38 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 234,646.51 234,646.51 1.23% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 234,646.51 234,646.51 2.23% 0.00 0.00 0.00 eeee�----__w— ----- n===== -�__�� =-eee__________ ___ NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 29,109,230.52 19,035,925.92 100.00% -73,304.60 601,480.47 3.16 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-JUN-1999 HB1100 8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 70,083.50 70,083.50 0.02% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -16,669,018.75 -16,669,010.75 -5.45% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 7,064,935.02 7,064,935.02 2.31% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 265,858.08 265,959.08 0.09% 0.00 12,341.32 4.64 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -9,268,142.15 -9,268,142.15 -3.03% 0.00 12,341.32 -0.13 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 130,515,238.67 127,722,916.26 41.779 -2,792,322.41 8,106,343.76 6.35 U.S. AGENCIES 49,222,790.50 47,850,001.50 15.65% -1,364,789.00 3,058,155.62 6.39 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 15,943,125.00 16,014,546.88 5.24% 71,422.88 1,057,500.00 6.60 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,412,971.33 4,372,212.69 1.43% -40,758.64 299,814.65 6.66 FHLMC POOLS 10,695,984.15 10,585,246.16 3.46% -110,737.99 737,200.14 6.96 FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,469,569.36 6,386,795.55 2.09% -82,773.81 397,761.20 6.23 FNMA POOLS 725,893.75 718,137.50 0.23% -7,756.25 42,113.70 5.86 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 141,834.92 142,012.22 0.05% 177.30 8,793.77 6.19 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 3,995,792.99 4,020,314.97 1.311 24,521.98 231,000.18 5.75 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 990,720.00 0.32% -9,280.00 62,000.00 6.26 BANKING a FINANCE 66,985,401.04 66,817,010.92 21.85% -168,470.22 3,697,629.61 5.53 INDUSTRIAL 17,029,969.00 16,161,509.35 5.29% -868,455.65 1,295,027.00 8.01 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 1,992,540.00 0.65% -150,710.00 164,000.00 8.23 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,451,475.00 2.448 -45,780.00 450,000.00 6.04 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ---------- ------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 316,797,155.71 311,233,438.90 201.78% -5,553,716.81 19,607,339.63 6.30 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,822,853.28 3,822,853.28 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,822,853.28 3,822,853.28 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----;77777,...... ----;;..<......... -7;;7;;; ----Fee...=.a-- - ---------------- -sees-- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 311,341,866.89 305,788,150.03 100.004 -5,553,716.81 19,619,680.95 6.42 Page 1 YLUANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCSF07511102 1999/06/30 RUN DAM t 07/00/99 DISMICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.01.13 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY ERNEST TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE HAREM VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 151,289.6E DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM .000 4.531 AAA 100.000 151,289.60 1.59 996005247 151,289.68 .80 3,400,000.00 US TREASURY BILLS 4.597 .000 P-1 98.553 3,350,799.17 35.32 912395CN9 D9/0911999 DO 03/11/99 3,350,799.17 10.82 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP DISC 4.846 .ODO P-1 9I.609 2,440,215.06 25.72 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 2,440,210.06 12.98 900,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL HUG ASSN DISC NT 4.859 .ODD P-1 98.787 089,080.00 9.37 313588RV6 MAT 00/24/1999 889,080.00 4.03 900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 4.901 .000 P-1 90.933 881,400.00 9.29 61166BWO D9/23/1999 861,400.00 4.69 900,000.DO GOLDNER SACHS LP DISC 4.940 .000 P-1 97.563 878,069.00 9.25 38142UY30 11/03/1999 870,069.00 4.63 900,000.OD GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 4.983 .000 P-1 99.532 895,784.00 9.44 369593UFS 07/15/1999 895,784.D0 4.36 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.617 .114 9,486,639.91 100.00 9,486,639.91 50.45 FIXED INCONE SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN RED CORE DENS .000 4.IO2 AAA 99.953 999,200.00 10.73 3134AIRT5 FLTG RT 05/10/2000 DO 05/10/99 999,530.00 5.32 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN AS CONS RUN 4.860 4.052 AAA 99.641 3,699,104.60 39.S7 3133N3EW2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DD 01/28/99 3,686,717.00 19.61 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 5.001 7.935 AA3 100.819 511,200.00 5.41 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 504,095.00 2.60 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.980 Al 102.084 529,010.00 5.47 111205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 520,420.00 2.71 050,000.00 PHILLIP NORRIS CO INC NTS 5.259 7.098 A2 100.375 863,I53.00 9.15 716154BX4 3.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 853,187.50 4.54 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSM7511102 1999/06/30 RON DATE : 0I/0I/99 DISTRICTf LIQUID OPERATING RON TIMB 13.01.13 PER VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MAREET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOON YIELD RATING PRICE ERNEST VALUE 3 TOTAL 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRE ACCEP CORD NIB 5.305 6.234 A2 100.252 909,637.00 9.68 33042MIG2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DD O1/11/94 902,268.00 4.80 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 5.363 1.595 A2 100.391 303,930.00 3.23 D73902AP3 3.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/94 301,173.00 1.60 150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP MT 5.364 9.I20 Al 100.312 151,663.50 1.61 173034D09 9.750% 08/01/1999 150,460.00 .80 900,000.00 LONG IBLAED LTG CO USE 5.429 7.296 BAA3 100.059 905,301.00 9.66 54267ICE6 9.300% 07/15/1999 DD 07/21/52 900,531.00 4.79 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MEN 98800110 5.653 9.346 A3 101.250 515,125.00 5.43 093SOMPI 9.450% 01/12/2000 DD 01/12/95 506,250.00 2.69 TOTAL FIXED INCOMB SECURITIES 4.226 5.932 9,307,944.10 100.00 9,314,639.50 49.54 TOTAL 4.381 3.627 18,074,564.01 100.00 10,901,279.41 100.00 YLDAAAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 OCSF07522202 1999/06/30 RUN DATE t 07/D7/99 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 13.01.13 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT QUALITY MAREET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MEANT! VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASE 6 CASH EQUIVAI3RTS 265,858.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE NGHT .000 4.531 AAA 100.OD0 265,85B.08 3.62 996085247 265,858.08 .08 1,000,000.00 FORD HIS CH. CO DISC 4.840 .000 P-1 90.752 987,518.88 13.49 34539WS9 07/26/1999 901,S1B.88 .31 2,100,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE CO DISC 4.851 .000 P-1 99.557 1,095,129.75 14.93 74271SUGO 06/03/1999 1,095,129.75 .34 2,700,000.00 ANERITHCH CORP DISC 4.999 .000 P-2 99.626 2,689,915.50 39.69 02680RUL0 07/20/1999 2,689,915.50 .94 400,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DIM 5.108 .000 P-1 99.450 397,790.67 5.42 62008OV30 08/03/1999 397,798.67 .12 1,900,000.00 SHARRON ELEC CO DISC 6.067 .ODD P-1 99.314 1,894,572.22 25.84 29101DU97 07/09/1999 1,894,572.22 .59 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.662 .333 7,330,793.10 100.00 7,330,793.20 2.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANANAS TR SY CORP GLOBAL HT .000 5.825 Al 99.488 1,992,800.00 .63 066365DN4 MW AT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 1,989,360.00 .62 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN HER .000 5.002 Al 99.906 3,498,635.00 1.12 17120QERD FLTG RT O8108/2002 DD 04/08/90 3,496,710.00 1.10 2,000,000.00 FORD HER CA CO THAN ENHANCED .000 5.114 Al 99.796 1,998,613.60 .64 345397SCB PLED RT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/90 1,995,920.00 .63 3,000,000.00 GENERAL NTRS ACCEP HIS .000 5.530 A2 100.312 3,010,830.00 .96 39042NVR9 MID AT 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 3,009,360.00 .94 3,950,000.00 GENERAL RUES ACCEP CORP HER .000 5.523 A2 99.636 3,918,768.50 1.26 370425OV5 MW AT O6/18/2003 DD 00/17/90 3,935,622.00 1.24 4,000,000.00 MLLER FINANCIAL INC ATE .000 .010 A2 100.000 4,000,000.00 1.20 423328BR8 FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 4,000,000.00 1.26 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 4 OCSP07522202 1999/06/30 RON DATE 07/07/99 DISTRICTi LONG-TERN OPERATING ROD TIME 1 13.01.13 PAN VALUE YT34 AT CONSENT QUALITY HASSET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MEANT VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 3,000,000.00 FELLER FIRL EYE 4TR 00246 .D00 5.239 A3 100.359 3,000,000.00 .96 42333ELF7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 3,010,740.00 .95 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO RYE .000 5.455 A2 99.896 4,000,000.00 1.28 44181RSA5 MID AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/90 3,995,440.00 1.25 1,000,OOD.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN EYE SR 400570 .000 5.762 A2 99.684 999,188.90 .32 44181RST4 FLTG RT 09/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 996,840.00 .31 4,041,736.17 STUDENT LN NEW ASSN 1997-1 Al .000 5.746 AAA 99.47D 3,995,792.99 1.29 78442GAR2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,020,314.97 1.26 7,262,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.698 3.664 AAA 98.937 7,239,343.10 2.30 9120273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/90 7,185,299.63 2.26 10,487,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.324 3.520 AAA 95.875 10,208,475.00 3.23 9128272N3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 10,054,890.63 3.16 8,500,000.OD U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 6.157 AAA 101.516 9,034,223.67 2.77 9128212G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 8,628,860.00 2.31 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN ME 4.943 6.525 AAA 102.219 20,012,510.00 6.24 31364CXY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DD 03/27/97 19,421,610.00 6.10 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PON DNNA SF HOG 5.025 6.402 AAA 93.719 5,900,701.25 1.89 OIN060676 6.000% 00/15/2029 5,857,437.50 1.84 7,000,00D.00 HORGAN STANLEY ETN EYE 00299 5.130 5.151 RA3 99.984 6,996,129.00 2.24 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 6,998,880.00 2.20 S,OOO,OOO.OD U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.320 AAA 119.266 6,233,593.75 1.91 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 5,963,300.00 1.97 31,500,000.00 U S TREASURY M0MS 5.294 6.232 AAA 101.641 32,509,817.31 10.20 912827E54 06.375% 09/30/2001 DD 09/30/96 32,016,915.00 10.05 17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 7.200 AAA 104.172 18,390,684.02 5.32 912020D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 17,013,412.00 5.59 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.402 6.147 AAA 101.672 5,607,662.23 1.79 9120273GS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 51591,960.00 1.06 11,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.456 5.542 AAA 99.234 11,918,309.15 3.39 912827482 05.500% 05/31/2003 DD 05/31/98 11,808,846.00 3.71 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 O BF07522202 1999/06/30 RUN DATE S 07/07/99 DISTRICTS TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 1 13.01.13 PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY HAMLET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE E TDTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 5,200,000.00 U 8 TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.662 AAA 122.906 6,698,250.00 2.05 9128100GO 11.875E 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,391,112.00 2.01 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR SIR 5.650 6.470 AA3 100.469 1,543,215.00 .48 046003HYS 6.500E 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,507,035.00 .47 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH 5.742 5.964 AAA 99.375 725,893.75 .23 IIFO11677 VAR AT O7/01/2029 718,137.50 .23 1,DDO,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.760 5.610 A3 98.838 999,730.00 .31 42333MJ0 5.750E 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/96 998,360.00 .31 13,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.703 6.356 AAA 102.266 13,491,427.21 4.30 9128272WI 06.500E 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 13,396,046.00 4.21 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD MIN 5.004 6.594 A2 99.167 2,060,739.00 .63 01240QGN6 6.540E 02/20/2003 DO D2/20197 1,908,699.35 .62 5,000,DOD.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.150 AAA 101.500 5,086,402.25 1.63 9128272L5 06.250E 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 5,075,000.00 1.59 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.049 6.646 A2 99.765 3,073,170.00 .96 812400JAI 6.630E 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 2,992,950.00 .94 14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MIN 5.992 6.127 AAA 93.187 14,560,462.50 4.41 31364GLD9 5.710E 12/15/2008 OD 12/15/98 13,745,092.50 4.31 6,000,000.00 NATIDNSNANK CRAR2AITS N C HIS 5.992 5.963 KA1 99.781 5,996,400.00 1.92 63858JDE6 5.850E 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 5,966,860.00 1.88 845,119.95 FBLNC MULTICL HTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.900 100.000 843,931.49 .27 3133T02D5 5.900E 06/15/2017 845,119.95 .27 907,750.53 CHASE MANRATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 5.957 5.890 AAA 100.027 905,079.19 .29 161614AE2 5.900E 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 908,003.62 .29 2,500,000.00 MERILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.359 AA 100.254 2,526,725.00 .80 590186KP4 6.375E 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 2,506,350.00 .79 7,500,000.00 BELL90UTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.039 AAA 99.353 7,497,255.00 2.39 079967MS 6.000E 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 7,451,475.00 2.34 1,250,000.00 GENERAL HIRE ACCEP CORP HIS 6.032 7.026 A2. 101.413 1,283,862.50 .40 370425QF0 7.125E 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/97 1,267,662.50 .40 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6 OCSM7522202 1999/06/30 RUN DATE 07/07/99 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.01.13 PAR VALUE YTN AT CONSENT QUALITY MEANT TOTE COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE ERRANT VALUE E TOTAL 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTN 6.046 6.652 A2 100.718 1,018,520.00 .32 37042MGR1 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,007,180.00 .32 2,000,000.00 BANNBOSTON CORD SR NTS 6.133 6.183 A2 99.060 11999,600.00 .63 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 1,981,20D.00 .62 1,000,000.00 FIRST USA M NA MTN 4SR 00002 6.164 6.131 M2 99.903 999,100.00 .32 33744CA211 6.1251 06/25/2001 DD 06/23/99 999,030.00 .31 141,834.93 FIFER TRIM BE AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.192 AAA 100.125 141,834.92 .04 31677EM4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 142,012.22 .04 1,000,000.00 POPUTAR INC NTN FOR 00004 6.201 6.250 A3 99.072 1,DOO,000.00 .31 73317PAD1 6.2001 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 990,720.00 .31 2,500,000.00 UMAN BROS BLDGS MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.393 BM1 100.105 2,509,175.00 .80 52537PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 2,5D2,625.00 .79 4,500,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG MAN NTN 6.291 6.163 AAA 101.094 4,400,705.00 1.46 31364CYV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,549,230.00 1.43 3,620,789.68 PRIM MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.077 AM 99.028 3,624,749.87 1.15 3133ME95 6.324% 08/15/2032 3,585,595.60 1.13 2,000,000.00 BEM STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.755 A2 99.930 2,031,960.00 .64 073902"1 6.750E 04/15/2003 1,998,600.00 .63 5,000,000.00 LENNAN BOOS BLDGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.652 ARA1 99.968 5,039,450.D0 1.60 52517POD4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 4,998,400.00 1.57 10,500,OOD.00 COMMIT TO POR GNMA SF RIG 6.392 6.719 AM 96.734 10,142,343.75 3.26 OIN062672 6.500E 07/15/2029 10,157,109.30 3.19 1,3D5,000.00 BEM STEARNS COS INC SR ETA 6.425 6.715 A2 100.514 1,317,619.35 .42 073902ANS 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 1,311,707.70 .41 2,000,000.00 FELNC NULTICIASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.646 MA 97.804 2,000,088.00 .62 3133MPV2 6.500% 09/25/2010 1,956,080.00 .61 2,304,676.94 PRIM EULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.551 6.913 AAA 88.064 2,140,537.00 .65 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 2,029,599.00 .64 0,000,000.00 FEDERAL MTL MTG AMR ETN 6.577 6.533 MA 101.406 9,012,576.00 2.60 31364CBM 6.6251 04/18/2001 DD 04/18/96 0,112,480.00 2.55 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t I OCSF0I522202 1999/06/30 RUN DATE t 07/07/99 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE f 13.01.13 PM VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE NAREET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 9,000,000.00 PBILIP NORRIS COS NT 6.593 9.071 A2 101.968 9,903,780.00 2.94 110154882 9.250% 02/15/2000 9,1II,120.00 2.88 10,531,430.55 FBLNC GROUP 4G5-0406 6.628 6.964 AM 100.511 10,695,904.15 3.40 3126DDQ55 7.0000 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/90 10,585,246.16 3.32 2,512,917.15 GNNA II POOL BO8OO88N 6.705 6.830 AM 100.656 2,567,887.21 .01 36225CC20 6.8750 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 2,529,401.89 .79 2,000,000.00 MEER 6 RCLEMAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.616 A2 100.13I 1,992,280.00 .64 57174BAB0 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 2,002,740.00 .63 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP IOC RTN SR 00024 6.I90 6.063 M3 97.476 2,900,880.00 .93 12560PAE4 5.910% 11/10/2003 DD 11/09/90 2,924,280.00 .92 2,500,000.00 COUNTAYNIDE ROM LEE INC NT 6.866 6.049 A3 100.017 2,490,400.00 .80 22237UABB 6.050% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 2,500,425.00 .78 1,815,022.80 GNRA II POOL #0080023 6.869 6.894 AM 101.531 1,845,084.12 .59 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 1.842,SID.B0 .58 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 6.325 AAA 151.859 4,029,030.31 1.21 912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2D14 DD 05/15/04 3,791,475.00 1.19 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.231 BM3 99.620 2,151,250.00 .64 542671CT7 8.2001 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 1,992,540.00 .63 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.460 6.021 316,787,155.71 100.00 311,233,438.90 97.74 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 4.461 6.009 324,117,948.01 100.00 310,564,232.00 100.00 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LASS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES BLOCK OF 5 04-JUN-1999 -4.25 -4.25 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- -4.25 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES BLOCK OF 4 04-JUN-1999 -3.40 -3.40 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- -3.40 0.00 0.000000 CN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 14-JUN-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000 NA9123459 99359V456 ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES is-JUN-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000 99359E051 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000 CN 04.470% 06/18/1999 DO 06/17/99 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS DISC 18-JUN-1999 -5,496,409.72 -5,496,409.72 99.934722 02581STP6 06/23/1999 18-JUN-1999 5,496,409.72 5,496,409.72 99.934722 B AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS DISC is-JUN-1999 -5,496,409.72 -5,496,409.72 99.934722 02581STP6 06/23/1999 18-JUN-1999 -5,496,409.72 0.00 99.934722 PC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 23-JUN-1999 -2,689,915.50 -2,689,915.50 99.626500 0268OKULO 07/20/1999 23-JUN-1999 2,689,915.50 2,689,915.50 99.626500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 2,700,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 23-JUN-1999 -2,689,915.50 -2,689,915.50 99.626500 0268OKULO 07/20/1999 23-JUN-1999 -2,689,915.50 0.00 99.626500 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 04-JUN-1999 -398,113.89 -398,113.89 99.528472 29101DU97 07/09/1999 04-JUN-1999 398,113.89 398,113.89 99.528472 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 04-JUN-1999 -398,113.89 -398,113.89 99,528472 29101DU97 07/09/1999 04-JUN-1999 -398,113.89 0.00 99.528472 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 22-JUN-1999 -1,496,458.33 -1,496,458.33 99.763888 29101DU97 07/09/1999 22-JUN-1999 1,496,458.33 1,496,450.33 99.763888 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 EMERSON ELEC CO DISC 22-JUN-1999 -1,496,458.33 -1,496,458.33 99.763888 29101DU97 07/09/1999 22-JUN-1999 -1,496,458.33 0.00 99.763888 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 22-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JUN-1999 -895,784.00 -895,784.00 99.531556 36959JUF8 07/15/1999 11-JUN-1999 895,784.00 895,784.00 99.531556 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JUN-1999 -895,784.00 -895,784.00 99.531556 36959JUF8 07/15/1999 11-JUN-1999 -895,784.00 0.00 99.531556 PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 24-JUN-1999 -397,798.67 -397,798.67 99.449666 62008BV38 08/03/1999 25-JUN-1999 397,798.67 397,798.67 99.449666 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 24-JUN-1999 -397,798.67 -397,799.67 99.449666 62008BV38 08/03/1999 25-JUN-1999 -397,798.67 0.00 99.449666 PC MORGAN STANLEY a CO INC, NY 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE CO DISC 03-JUN-1999 -1,095,129.75 -1,095,129.75 99.557250 74271SU60 06/03/1999 03-JUN-1999 1,095,129.75 1,095,129.75 99.557250 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE CO DISC 03-JUN-1999 -1,095,129.75 -1,095,129.75 99.557250 74271S000 06/03/1999 03-JUN-1999 -1,095,129.75 0.00 99.557250 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 03-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-JUN-1999 -3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 100.000000 993590788 04.610% 06/07/1999 DD 06/04/99 04-JUN-1999 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 100.000000 e LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-JUN-1999 -3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 100.000000 993590788 04.610% 06/07/1999 DO 06/04/99 04-JUN-1999 -3,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359V456 04.690% 06/14/1999 DD 06/11/99 11-JUN-1999 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359V456 04.690% 06/14/1999 DD 06/11/99 11-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359ZO51 04.470% 06/18/1999 DO 06/17/99 17-JUN-1999 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359ZOSI 04.470% 06/10/1999 DO O6/17/99 17-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 17-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30,281.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-JUN-1999 -30,281.25 -30,281.25 1.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 30,281.25 30,281.25 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30,281.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-JUN-1999 -30,281.25 -30,281.25 1.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 -30,281.25 0.00 1.000000 PC O1-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 981,064.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-JUN-1999 -981,064.44 -981,064.44 1.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 981,064.44 981,064.44 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 981,064.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-JUN-1999 -961,064.44 -981,064.44 1.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 -961,064.44 0.00 1.000000 FC O1-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-JUN-1999 -32.57 -32.57 1.000000 996085247 02-JUN-1999 32.57 32.57 1.000000 e ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-JUN-1999 -32.57 -32.57 1.000000 996085247 02-JUN-1999 -32.57 0.00 1.000000 PC 02-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 482.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-JUN-1999 -482.28 -482.28 1.000000 996085247 03-JUN-1999 482.28 482.28 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCSG0001UO MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 482.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-JUN-1999 -482.28 -482.28 1.000000 996085247 03-JUN-1999 -482.28 0.00 1.000000 FC 03-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,001,149.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JUN-1999 -3,001,149.10 -3,001,149.10 1.000000 996085247 07-JUN-1999 3,001,149.10 3,001,149.10 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,002,149.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JUN-1999 -3,001,149.10 -3,001,149.10 1.000000 996085247 07-JUN-1999 -3,001,149.10 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,216.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JUN-1999 -4,216.00 -4,216.00 1.000000 996085247 11-JUN-1999 4,216.00 4,216.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,216.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JUN-1999 -4,216.00 -4,216.00 1.000000 996085247 11-JUN-1999 -4,216.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 208,578.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JUN-1999 -208,578.98 -208,578.98 1.000000 996085247 14-JUN-1999 208,578.98 208,578.98 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 208,578.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JUN-1999 -208,578.98 -208,578.98 1.000000 996085247 14-SUN-1999 -208,578.98 0.00 1.000000 FC 14-SUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,273,622.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JUN-1999 -1,273,622.64 -1,273,622.64 1.000000 996085247 15-JUN-1999 1,273,622.64 1,273,622.64 1.000000 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,273,622.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JUN-1999 -1,273,622.64 -1,273,622.64 1.000000 996085247 15-JUN-1999 -1,273,622.64 0.00 1.000000 PC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,D00.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-JUN-1999 -900,000.00 -900,000.00 1.000000 996085247 16-JUN-1999 900,000.00 900,000.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-JUN-1999 -900,000.00 -900,000.00 1.000000 996085247 16-JUN-1999 -900,000.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 16-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,051.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-JUN-1999 -4,051.53 -4,051.53 1.000000 996085247 18-JUN-1999 4,051.53 4,051.53 1.000000 e -- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,051.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-JUN-1999 -4,051.53 -4,051.53 1.000000 996095247 18-JUN-1999 -4,051.53 0.00 1.000000 PC is-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 155,344.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JUN-1999 -155,344.36 -155,344.36 1.000000 996085247 21-JUN-1999 155,344.36 155,344.36 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 155,344.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JUN-1999 -155,344.36 -155,344.36 1.000000 996085247 21-JUN-1999 -155,344.36 0.00 1.000000 PC 21-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,529,235.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-JUN-1999 -1,529,235.36 -1,529,235.36 1.000000 Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996065247 23-JUN-1999 1,529,235.36 1,529,235.36 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,529,235.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-JUN-1999 -1,529,235.36 -1,529,235.36 1.000000 996095247 23-JUN-1999 -1,529,235.36 0.00 1.000000 FC 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,355.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JUN-1999 -34,355.33 -34,355.33 1.000000 996085247 25-JUN-1999 34,355.33 34,355.33 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,355.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JUN-1999 -34,355.33 -34,355.33 1.000000 996085247 25-JUN-1999 -34,355.33 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,757.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-JUN-1999 -13,757.41 -13,757.41 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 16-JUN-1999 13,757.41 13,757.41 1.000000 B 16-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-KAY-1999 -6,011,718.75 -6,011,718.75 96.197500 O1N060660 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -6,011,718.75 0.00 96.187500 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 07-KAY-1999 -6,011,710.75 -6,011,718.75 96.107500 O1H060668 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 6,011,718.75 6,011,718.75 96.187500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-MAY-1999 6,011,710.75 6,011,718.75 96.187500 OIN060668 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -6,011,718.75 -6,011,719.75 96.187500 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-JUN-1999 -5,800,781.25 -5,800,781.25 92.812500 OIN060676 6.0001 07/15/2029 22-JUL-1999 5,900,781.25 5,800,781.25 92.812500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 98.375000 01NO62664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 98.375000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 98.375000 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 98.375000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 98.375000 01NO62664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 98.375000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 98.375000 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 98.375000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 98.375000 OIN062664 6.5001 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 0.00 98.375000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 -10,142,343.75 -10,142,343.75 96.593750 OIN062672 6.500% 07/15/2029 22-JUL-1999 10,142,343.75 10,142,343.75 96.593750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -2,236,960.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 11FO11669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,236,968.75 0.00 100.312500 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 2,008,750.00 2,008,750.00 100.437500 11F011669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,008,750.00 -2,008,750.00 100.437500 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,270,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 1,275,556.25 2,275,556.25 100.437500 1IF011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -1,275,556.25 -1,275,556.25 100.437500 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNHA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -733,193.75 -733,193.75 100.437500 11F011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -733,193.75 0.00 100.437500 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN 4 SR 00042 03-JUN-1999 -2,997,450.00 -2,997,450.00 99.915000 12560MBT4 6.500% 06/14/2002 DO O6/08/99 08-JUN-1999 2,997,450.00 2,997,450.00 99.915000 B DONALDSON, LUFKIN 6 JENRETTE- ----------- O.DO 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN 4 SR 00042 03-JUN-1999 -2,997,450.00 -2,997,450.00 99.915000 12560MBT4 6.500% 06/14/2002 DO O6/08/99 08-JUN-1999 -2,997,450.00 0.00 99.915000 FC DONALDSON, LUFKIN s JENRETTE, 08-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 15-JUN-1999 -2,900,880.00 -2,900,880.00 96.696000 12560PAZ4 5.910% 11/10/2003 DO 11/09/98 18-JUN-1999 2,900,880.00 2,900,880.00 96.696000 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 15-JUN-1999 -18,715.00 -18,715.00 96.696000 12560PAZ4 5.910% 11/10/2003 DO 11/09/98 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 96.696000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN SR 00024 15-JUN-1999 -2,919,595.00 -2,919,595.OD 96.696000 12560PAZ4 5.910% 11/10/2003 DO 11/09/98 18-JUN-1999 -2,919,595.00 0.00 96.696000 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 19-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 0CSG000300 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 11-JUN-1999 -2,498,400.00 -2,498,400.00 99.936000 22237UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 24-JUN-1999 2,498,400.00 2,498,400.00 99.936000 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 17-JUN-1999 -2,498,400.00 -2,498,400.00 99.936000 22237UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO O6/24/99 24-JUN-1999 -2,498,400.00 0.00 99.936000 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 367,725.46 FNMA POOL 00096647 11-MAY-1999 -369,334.26 -369,334.26 100.437500 31363EHY4 5.839% 09/01/2028 DO 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 369,334.26 369,334.26 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- O.DO 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 367,725.46 FNMA POOL #0086647 11-MAY-1999 -1,355.34 -1,355.34 100.437500 31363EHY4 5.839% 09/01/2028 DO 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 367,725.46 FNMA POOL #0086647 11-MAY-1999 -370,689.60 -370,689.60 100.437500 31363EHY4 5.839% 09/01/2028 DO 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 -370,689.60 0.00 100.437500 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 D.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 329,940.55 FNMA POOL #0115740 11-MAY-1999 -331,384.04 -331,384.04 100.437500 31364SPZ0 6.131% 12/D1/2030 DO 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 331,384.04 331,384.04 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 329,940.55 FNMA POOL #0115740 11-MAY-1999 -1,209.97 -1,209.97 100.437500 31364SPZ0 6.131% 12/01/2030 DO 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 329,940.55 FNMA POOL #0115740 11-MAY-1999 -332,594.01 -332,594.01 100.437500 31364SPZ0 6.131% 12/01/2030 DO 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 -332,594.01 0.00 100.437500 Page 10 OCSGUOOIUO MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TN100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PINCO 270,026.41 FNMA POOL #0313769 11-14AY-1999 -271,207.78 -271,207.78 100.437500 31374GON0 5.905% 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 271,207.78 271,207.78 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 270,026.41 FNMA POOL 10313769 11-MAY-1999 -998.01 -998.01 100.437500 31374GOWO 5.9051 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.437500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 270,026.41 FNMA POOL #0313769 11-MAY-1999 -272,205.79 -272,205.79 100.437500 31374GON0 5.905% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 -272,205.79 0.00 100.437500 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 11000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,433.99 FNMA POOL 10417840 11-MAY-1999 -303,757.04 -303,757.04 100.437500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DO 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 303,757.04 303,757.04 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,433.89 FNMA POOL #0417840 11-MAY-1999 -1,111.80 -1,111.80 100.437500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DO 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.437500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 302,433.89 FNMA POOL 10417840 11-KAY-1999 -304,869.84 -304,868.84 100.437500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DD 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 -304,868.84 0.00 100.437500 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FIRST USA BK MA MTN /SR 00002 18-JUN-1999 -999,100.00 -999,100.00 99.910000 33744CAB1 6.125% 06/25/2001 DO 06/23/99 23-JUN-1999 999,100.00 999,100.00 99.910000 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FIRST USA BE NA MTN #SR 00002 18-JUM-1999 -999,100.00 -999,100.00 99.910000 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 33744CAB1 6.125% 06/25/20D1 DO 06/23/99 23-JUN-1999 -999,100.00 0.00 99.910000 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 18-JUN-1999 -3,010,830.00 -3,010,830.00 100.361000 37042WVR9 FLTG RT 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 23-JUN-1999 3,010,830.00 3,010,830.00 100.361000 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COR - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 18-JUN-1999 -2,765.00 -2,765.00 100.361000 37042WVR9 FLTG AT 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.361000 IB 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN is-JUN-1999 -3,013,595.00 -3,013,595.00 100.361000 37042WVR9 FLTG AT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/98 23-JUN-1999 -3,013,595.00 0.00 100.361000 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-JUN-1999 -4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 100.000000 423328BKB FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 25-JUN-1999 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 100.000000 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-JUN-1999 -4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 100.000000 423328BK8 FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 25-JUN-1999 -4,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 09-JUN-1999 -1,992,280.00 -1,992,280.00 99.614000 57174BABB 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 14-JUN-1999 1,992,280.00 1,992,280.00 99.614000 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 09-JUN-1999 -1,992,280.00 -1,992,280.00 99.614000 571748AB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 14-JUN-1999 -1,992,280.00 0.00 99.614000 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 14-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUN-1999 -22.00 -22.00 100.000000 31337CE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUN-1999 22.00 22.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUN-1999 -22.00 -22.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUN-1999 -22.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,466.02 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JUN-1999 -11,466.02 -11,466.02 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.0001 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JUN-1999 11,466.02 11,466.02 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,466.02 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SEA 1620E O1-JUN-1999 11,466.02 11,466.02 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JUN-1999 -11,466.02 -11,466.02 100.000000 PUC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,466.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JUN-1999 -11,466.01 -11,466.01 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JUN-1999 11,466.01 11,466.01 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,466.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JUN-1999 -11,466.01 -11,466.01 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JUN-1999 -11,466.01 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX MT 15-JAM-1999 -74,200.00 -74,200.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 74,200.00 74,200.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -74,200.00 -74,200.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.3751 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -74,200.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 30-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: QED O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,450.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -51,450.00 -51,450.00 100.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 51,450.00 51,450.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,450.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -51,450.DO -51,450.00 100.000000 9128273AO 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -51,45D.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 30-JUN-1999 D.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-JUN-1999 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 100.000000 993590788 04.610% 06/07/1999 OD 06/04/99 07-JUN-1999 -3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-JUN-1999 1,152.50 1,152.50 100.000000 99359Q788 04.610% 06/07/1999 DO 06/04/99 07-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-JUN-1999 3,001,152.50 3,001,152.50 100.000000 993590788 04.610% 06/07/1999 DO O6/04/99 07-JUN-1999 3,001,152.50 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 07-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-JUN-1999 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359V456 04.690% 06/14/1999 DD 06/11/99 14-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-JUN-1999 859.83 859.83 100.000000 99359V456 04.690% 06/14/1999 DD O6/11/99 14-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST _ OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-JUN-1999 2,200,859.83 2,200,059.83 100.000000 99359V456 04.690% 06/14/1999 DO 06/11/99 14-JUN-1999 2,200,859.83 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 14-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-JUN-1999 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 100.000000 99359Z051 04.470% 06/18/1999 DD 06/17/99 18-JUN-1999 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-JUN-1999 273.11 273.17 100.000000 99359Z051 04.470% 06/18/1999 DO O6/17/99 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-JUN-1999 2,200,273.17 2,200,273.17 100.000000 99359Z051 04.470% 06/18/1999 DO O6/17/99 18-JUN-1999 2,200,273.17 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,677.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-JUN-1999 1,093,677.89 1,093,677.89 1.000000 996085247 03-JUN-1999 -1,093,677.89 -1,093,677.89 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,677.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-JUN-1999 1,093,677.89 1,093,677.89 1.000000 996085247 03-JUN-1999 1,093,677.89 0.00 1.000000 FC 03-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,529.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JUN-1999 31,529.61 31,529.61 1.000000 996085247 04-JUN-1999 -31,529.61 -31,529.61 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,529.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JUN-1999 31,529.61 31,529.61 1.000000 996085247 04-JUN-1999 31,529.61 0.00 1.000000 FC 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30.JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JUN-1999 4.25 4.25 1.000000 996085247 07-JUN-1999 -4.25 -4.25 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JUN-1999 4.25 4.25 1.000000 996085247 07-JUN-1999 4.25 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,997,450.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JUN-1999 2,997,450.00 2,997,450.00 1.000000 , 996085247 DB-JUN-1999 -2,997,450.00 -2,997,450.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,997,450.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JUN-1999 2,997,450.00 2,997,450.00 1.000000 996085247 08-JUN-1999 2,997,450.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 08-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 10-JUN-1999 144.48 144.48 1.000000 996085247 10-JUN-1999 -144.48 -144.48 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-JUN-1999 144.48 144.48 1.000000 996085247 10-JUN-1999 144.48 0.00 1.000000 FC 10-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,186,242.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-JUN-1999 2,186,242.59 2,186,242.59 1.000000 996085247 17-JUN-1999 -2,186,242.59 -2,186,242.59 1.000000 $ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,186,242.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-JUN-1999 2,186,242.59 2,186,242.59 1.000000 996085247 17-JUN-1999 2,186,242.59 0.00 1.000000 PC 17-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSO-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,564.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-JUN-1999 32,564.49 32,564.49 1.000000 996085247 18-JUN-1999 -32,564.49 -32,564.49 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,564.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-JUN-1999 32,564.49 32,564.49 1.000000 996085247 18-JUN-1999 32,564.49 0.00 1.000000 FC 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -96,458.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JUN-1999 96,458.33 96,458.33 1.000000 996085247 22-JUN-1999 -96,458.33 -96,458.33 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -96,458.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JUN-1999 96,458.33 96,458.33 1.000000 996095247 22-JUN-1999 96,458.33 0.00 1.000000 PC 22-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,653,034.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-JUN-1999 1,653,034.02 1,653,034.02 1.000000 996085247 24-JUN-1999 -1,653,034.02 -1,653,034.02 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,653,034.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-JUN-1999 1,653,034.02 1,653,034.02 1.000000 996085247 24-JUN-1999 1,653,034.02 0.00 1.000000 FC 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,757.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-JUN-1999 13,757.41 13,757.41 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 17-JUN-1999 -13,757.41 -13,757.41 1.000000 S 17-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 O.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-JUN-1999 5,807,373.05 5,007,373.05 92.917968 OIN060660 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -6,011,718.75 -6,011,718.75 92.917968 Page 17 OCSGO00100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -204,345.70 -204,345.70 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-JUN-1999 -5,807,373.05 -5,807,373.05 92.917968 O1N060668 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 6,011,718.75 6,011,718.75 92.917968 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 204,345.70 204,345.70 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-JUN-1999 5,807,373.05 5,807,373.05 92.917968 O1NO60668 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -6,011,718.75 -6,011,718.75 92.917969 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -204,345.70 -204,345.70 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-JUN-1999 5,807,373.05 5,807,373.05 92.917968 O1N060668 6.000% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 5,807,373.05 0.00 92.917968 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 10,156,289.06 96.726562 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 96.726562 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -173,085.94 -173,085.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 -10,156,289.06 -10,156,289.06 96.726562 O1N062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 96.726562 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ -- 173,085.94 173,D85.94 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 10,156,289.06 96.726562 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 96.726562 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -173,085.94 -173,085.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 10,156,289.06 96.726562 O1N062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 0.00 96.726562 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 -10,156,289.06 -10,156,289.06 96.726562 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 01N062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 96.726562 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 173,085.94 173,085.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 -10,156,289.06 -10,156,289.06 96.726562 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,156,289.06 0.00 96.726562 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNHA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 10,156,289.06 96.726562 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 96.726562 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -173,085.94 -173,085.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 10,156,289.06 96.726562 O1N062664 6.5001 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,156,289.06 0.00 96.726562 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,270,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 -1,273,968.75 -1,273,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR AT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 1,274,323.64 1,274,323.64 100.312500 SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 354.89 354.99 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,238,584.83 2,238,584.83 100.3125.00 SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 1,616.08 1,616.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 IIF0I1669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,238,594.83 -2,238,584.83 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -1,616.08 -1,616.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 IIF011669 VAR AT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,230,584.83 2,238,584.83 100.312500 SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 1,616.08 1,616.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 19 0CSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORA GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 1IF011669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,237,656.21 -2,237,656.21 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -687.46 -687.46 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 1IF011669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,236,968.75 O.OD 100.312500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-MAY-1999 -726,378.52 -726,378.52 99.503906 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 733,091.21 733,091.21 99.503906 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 6,712.69 6,712.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-MAY-1999 726,378.52 726,378.52 99.503906 1IF011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -732,810.28 -732,810.28 99.503906 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -6,431.76 -6,431.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-MAY-1999 -726,378.52 -726,378.52 99.503906 IIF0I1669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 732,810.28 732,810.28 99.503906 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 6,431.76 6,431.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-MAY-1999 726,378.52 726,378.52 99.503906 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -732,506.29 -732,506.29 99.503906 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -6,127.77 -6,127.77 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-MAY-1999 726,378.52 726,378.52 99.503906 IIF0I1669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 726,378.52 0.00 99.503906 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN 4 SR 00042 15-JUN-1999 2,994,240.00 2,994,240.00 99.808000 12560MBT4 6.500% 06/24/2002 DO O6/08/99 18-JUN-1999 -2,997,450.00 -2,997,450.00 99.808000 S BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- -3,210.00 -3,210.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ' O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN 1 SR 00042 15-JUN-1999 5,416.67 5,416.67 99.808000 12560MBT4 6.500% 06/14/2002 DD 06/08/99 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.800000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 CIT GROUP INC MTN 1 SR 00042 15-JUN-1999 2,999,656.67 2,999,656.67 99.808000 12560MBT4 6.500% 06/14/2002 DD O6/08/99 18-JUN-1999 2,999,656.67 0.00 99.808000 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -367,725.46 FNMA POOL #0086647 14-MAY-1999 368,874.60 368,874.60 100.312500 31363EHY4 5.839% 09/01/2028 DO 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 -369,334.26 -369,334.26 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -459.66 -459.66 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -367,725.46 FNMA POOL 10086647 14-14AY-1999 1,355.34 1,355.34 100.312500 31363EHY4 5.839% 09/01/2028 DO 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.312500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -367,725.46 FNMA POOL #0086647 14-MAY-1999 370,229.94 370,229.94 100.312500 31363EHY4 5.939% 09/01/2020 DD 12/01/89 24-JUN-1999 370,229.94 0.00 100.312500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -329,940.55 FNMA POOL 10215740 14-MAY-1999 330,971.61 330,972.61 100.312500 31364SPZ0 6.1311 12/01/2030 DD 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 -331,384.04 -331,384.04 -100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -412.43 -422.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -329,940.55 FNMA POOL #0115740 14-MAY-1999 1,209.97 1,209.97 100.312500 31364SPZ0 6.1311 12/01/2030 DD 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.312500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -329,940.55 FNMA POOL #0115740 14-MAY-1999 332,181.58 332,181.58 100.312500 31364SPZ0 6.1311 12/01/2030 DD 03/01/91 24-JUN-1999 332,181.58 0.00 100.312500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,026.41 FNMA POOL #0313769 14-MAY-1999 270,870.24 270,870.24 100.312500 31374GON0 5.905% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 -271,207.78 -271,207.78 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -337.54 -337.54 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,026.41 FNMA POOL #0313769 14-MAY-1999 998.01 998.01 100.312500 31374GON0 5.905% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.312500 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270,026.41 FNMA POOL #0313769 14-MAY-1999 271,868.25 271,868.25 100.312500 31374GOWO 5.905% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-JUN-1999 271,868.25 0.00 100.312500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302,433.89 FNMA POOL #0417840 14-MAY-1999 303,379.00 303,379.00 100.312500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DO 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 -303,757.04 -303,757.04 100.312500 S BEAR STEAMS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -378.04 -378.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302,433.89 FNMA POOL #0417840 14-MAY-1999 1,111.80 1,111.80 100.312500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DO 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.312500 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -302,433.89 FNMA POOL /0417840 14-MAY-1999 304,490.80 304,490.80 100.312500 31379FEM2 6.001% 12/01/2027 DO 04/01/98 24-JUN-1999 304,490.80 0.00 100.312500 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 18-JUN-1999 3,050,340.00 3,050,340.00 101.678000 37042RK04 8.625% 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 23-JUN-1999 -3,227,070.00 -3,227,070.00 101.678000 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- -176,730.00 -176,730.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 18-JUN-1999 58,937.50 58,937.50 101.678000 37042RK04 8.6251 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 101.678000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000DOO Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS RASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS is-JUN-1999 3,109,277.50 3,109,277.50 101.678000 37042RK04 8.625% 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 23-JUN-1999 3,109,277.50 0.00 101.678000 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 22-JUN-1999 4,007,264.00 4,007,264.00 100.181600 42333HJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DD 04/07/98 25-JUN-1999 -4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 100.181600 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 7,264.00 7,264.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 22-JUN-1999 14,056.67 14,056.67 100.181600 42333HJN3 FLTG AT 06/01/2000 DD 04/07/98 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 100.181600 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 22-JUN-1999 4,021,320.67 4,021,320.67 100.181600 42333HJN3 FLTG AT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 25-JUN-1999 4,021,320.67 0.00 100.181600 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-JUN-1999 3,064,453.13 3,064,453.13 102.148437 9128272N1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 04-JUN-1999 -3,089,639.82 -3,089,639.82 102.148437 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -25,186.69 -25,186.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-JUN-1999 2,131.15 2,131.15 102.149437 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.148437 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-JUN-1999 3,066,584.28 3,066,584.28 102.140437 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 04-JUN-1999 3,066,584.28 0.00 102.148437 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 2,775,937.50 2,775,937.50 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 -2,804,308.04 -2,804,309.04 99.140625 Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LASS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -28,370.54 -28,370.54 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 7,573.77 7,573.77 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.140625 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 -2,775,937.50 -2,775,937.50 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 2,804,308.04 2,804,308.04 99.140625 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 28,370.54 28,370.54 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 -7,573.77 -7,573.77 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.140625 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 11000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 2,775,937.50 2,775,937.50 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 -2,804,308.04 -2,804,308.04 99.140625 S GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY -28,370.54 -28,370.54 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 7,573.77 7,573.77 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.140625 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 o.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1999 2,783,511.27 2,783,511.27 99.140625 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DD 05/31/98 18-JUN-1999 2,783,511.27 0.00 99.140625 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -110,815.95 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JUN-1999 110,815.95 110,815.95 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JUN-1999 -110,586.53 -110,586.53 100.000000 PD ----------- 229.42 229.42 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -110,915.95 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JUN-1999 110,815.95 110,815.95 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JUN-1999 110,815.95 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -283,081.49 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JUN-1999 283,081.49 283,081.49 100.000000 3128DDOSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-JUN-1999 -287,504.64 -267,504.64 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,423.15 -4,423.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -293,081.49 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JUN-1999 283,081.49 283,081.49 100.000000 3128DD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-JUN-1999 283,081.49 0.00 100.000000 FC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 03,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-APR-1999 -83,364.00 -83,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 83,455.18 83,455.18 100.000000 PDC ----------- 91.18 91.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-APR-1999 -83,364.00 -03,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -83,364.00 0.00 100.000000 FCC 11-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 80,370.50 FNLHC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-MAY-1999 -80,370.50 -80,370.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 90,450.40 80,458.40 100.000000 PDC ----------- 87.90 87.90 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-MAY-1999 83,364.00 83,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 -93,455.18 -83,455.10 100.000000 PD ----------- -91.18 -91.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -03,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-MAY-1999 83,364.00 83,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324► 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 83,364.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 10-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -80,392.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-MAY-1999 80,392.50 80,392.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 -80,480.43 -80,480.43 100.000000 PD -- -87.93 -87.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -80,392.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-MAY-1999 80,392.50 90,392.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 80,392.50 0.00 100.000000 FC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70,083.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-JUN-1999 70,083.50 70,083.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUN-1999 -70,160.15 -70,160.15 100.000000 PD ----------- -76.65 -76.65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,456.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-JUN-1999 45,456.45 45,456.45 100.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JON-1999 -45,392.53 -45,392.53 100.000000 PD ----------- 63.92 63.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,456.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-JUN-1999 -45,456.45 -45,456.45 100.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JUN-1999 45,392.53 45,392.53 100.000000 PDC ----------- -63.92 -63.92 1.000000000 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,456.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-JUN-1999 45,456.45 45,456.45 1DD.000000 3133TO205 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JUN-1999 -45,392.53 -45,392.53 100.0000D0 PD ----------- 63.92 63.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,456.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-JUN-1999 45,456.45 45,456.45 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JUN-1999 45,456.45 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,461.01 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JUN-1999 15,461.01 15,461.01 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JUN-1999 -15,461.01 -15,461.01 100.000000 PD - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 26 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,461.01 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-JUN-1999 15,461.01 15,461.01 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JUN-1999 15,461.01 0.00 100.000000 FC 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,030.90 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-JUN-1999 28,030.90 28,030.90 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JUN-1999 -29,495.16 -28,495.16 100.000000 PD ----------- -464.26 -464.26 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,030.90 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-JUN-1999 28,030.90 28,030.90 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JUN-1999 28,030.90 0.00 100.000000 PC 21-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,591.74 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-JUN-1999 100,591.74 100,591.74 100.000000 36225CC20 6.675% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 -102,792.18 -102,792.18 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,200.44 -2,200.44 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,591.74 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-JUN-1999 -100,591.74 -100,591.74 100.000000 36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 102,792.18 202,792.18 100.000000 PDC ----------- 2,200.44 2,200.44 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102,919.64 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-JUN-1999 102,919.64 102,919.64 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 -105,171.01 -105,171.01 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,251.37 -2,251.37 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 102,919.64 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-JUN-1999 -102,919.64 -102,919.64 100.000000 36225CC20 6.9751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 105,171.01 105,171.01 100.000000 PDC ----------- 2,251.37 2,251.37 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102,919.65 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 01-JUN-1999 102,919.65 102,919.65 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 -105,171.02 -105,171.02 100.000000 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN ]ASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PD ----------- -2,251.37 -2,251.37 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102,919.65 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-JUN-1999 102,919.65 102,919.65 100.000000 36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-JUN-1999 102,919.65 0.00 100.000000 FC 21-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 16-JUN-1999 897,338.00 897,338.00 100.000000 02581STG6 06/16/1999 16-JUN-1999 -997,338.00 -897,338.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 16-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS DISC 23-JUN-1999 5,496,409.72 5,496,409.72 100.000000 02581STP6 06/23/1999 23-JUN-1999 -5,406,409.72 -5,496,409.72 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 22-JUN-1999 1,394,026.67 1,394,026.67 100.000000 07815KTN5 06/22/1999 22-JUN-1999 -1,394,026.67 -1,394,026.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 22-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 24-JUN-1999 796,144.00 796,144.00 100.000000 07915KT08 06/24/1999 24-JUN-1999 -796,144.00 -796,144.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC ll-JUN-1999 198,266.67 198,266.67 100.000000 19121ETB9 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 -198,266.67 -198,266.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-JUN-1999 297,080.00 297,080.00 100.000000 26354BT44 06/04/1999 04-JUN-1999 -297,080.00 -297,080.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD ' O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ SASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 11-JUN-1999 893,892.75 893,992.75 100.000000 39142UTB8 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 -893,892.75 -893,992.15 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 IBM DISC 25-JUN-1999 395,126.44 395,126.44 100.000000 45920ETR2 06/25/1999 25-JUN-1999 -395,126.44 -395,126.44 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-,TUN-1999 1,267,293.94 1,287,293.94 100.000000 63743DTB7 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 -1,287,293.94 -1,287,293.94 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC is-JUN-1999 397,668.00 397,668.00 100.000000 74271STJ4 06/18/1999 18-JUN-1999 -397,668.00 -397,668.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 11-JUN-1999 693,895.42 693,895.42 100.000000 90328BTB7 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 -693,895.42 -693,895.42 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 16-JUN-1999 2,662.00 2,662.00 0.000000 02581STG6 06/16/2999 16-JUN-1999 2,662.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS DISC 23-JUN-1999 3,590.28 3,590.28 0.000000 02581STP6 06/23/1999 23-JUN-1999 3,590.26 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 22-JUN-1999 5,973.33 5,973.33 0.000000 07615KTN5 06/22/1999 22-JUN-1999 5,913.33 0.00 0.000000 Page 29 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TMIDD BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 22-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 24-JUN-1999 3,856.00 3,856.00 0.000000 07815KT08 06/24/1999 24-JUN-1999 3,856.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 15-JUN-1999 225,000.00 225,000.00 0.000000 079867AX5 6.000% 06/15/2002 DD O6/15/98 15-JUN-1999 225,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 110,815.95 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JUN-1999 5,008.00 51008.00 0.000000 161614AE2 5.9001 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-JUN-1999 5,008.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 16-JUN-1999 13,757.41 13,757:41 0.000000 171200ESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-MAY-1999 13,757.41 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 11-JUN-1999 1,733.33 1,733.33 0.000000 19121ETB9 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 1,733.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-JUN-1999 2,920.00 2,920.00 0.000000 26354BT44 06/04/1999 04-JUN-1999 2,920.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 283,D81.49 FHLMC GROUP #G5-0476 15-JUN-1999 63,084.65 63,084.65 0.000000 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-JUN-1999 63,084.65 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 17-MAY-1999 -19,577.20 -19,577.20 0.000000 Page 30 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -19,577.20 0.00 0.000000 ITC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 10-JUN-1999 19,432.72 19,432.72 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.3241 O0/15/2032 01-APR-1999 19,432.72 0.00 0.000000 IT 10-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 80,392.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-JUN-1999 19,018.71 19,018.71 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% O8/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 19,010.71 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-JUN-1999 22.00 22.00 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 22.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-JUN-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-MAY-1999 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,456.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-JUN-1999 4,370.66 4,379.66 0.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JUN-1999 4,378.66 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,466.01 FHIMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 17-JUN-1999 11,466.01 11,466.01 0.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-JUN-1999 11,466.01 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DERR 18-JUN-1999 4,051.53 4,051.53 0.000000 3134A3RT5 FLTG AT 05/10/2000 DO 05/18/99 18-JUN-1999 4,051.53 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 31 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------""--------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -------------""- 14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 15-JUN-1999 421,112.50 421,112.50 0.000000 31364GLD9 5.710% 12/15/2008 DO 12/15/98 15-JUN-1999 421,112.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,461.01 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-JUN-1999 812.69 812.69 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-JUN-1999 812.69 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 28,030.90 GNMA II POOL #0080023 21-JUN-1999 9,407.25 9,407.25 0.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JUN-1999 9,407.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 102,919.65 GNMA II POOL 0090088H 21-JUN-1999 14,986.56 14,986.56 0.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD O6/01/97 01-JUN-1999 14,986.56 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 11-JUN-1999 6,107.25 6,107.25 0.000000 38142UT88 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 6,107.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN O1-JUN-1999 53,564.44 53,564.44 0.000000 42333HJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 01-JUN-1999 53,564.44 0.00 0.000000 IT O1-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN 24-JUN-1999 53,768.88 53,768.68 0.000000 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 24-JUN-1999 53,768.88 0.00 0.000000 IT 24-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 400,000.00 IBM DISC 25-JUN-1999 4,873.56 4,873.56 0.000000 45920ETR2 06/25/1999 25-JUN-1999 4,873.56 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 32 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-JUN-1999 12,706.06 12,706.06 0.000000 63743DTB7 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 12,706.06 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 950,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS O1-JUN-1999 30,281.25 30,281.25 0.000000 718154BX4 7.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 01-JUN-1999 30,281.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC is-JUN-1999 2,332.00 2,332.00 0.000000 74271STJ4 06/18/1999 18-JUN-1999 2,332.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 11-JUN-1999 6,104.58 6,104.58 0.000000 90328BTB7 06/11/1999 11-JUN-1999 6,104.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-MAY-1999 -30,900.00 -30,900.00 0.000000 9128272H3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -30,900.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0,00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-HAY-1999 30,900.00 30,900.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 28-MAY-2999 30,900.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 05/28/99 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-JUN-1999 74,200.00 74,200.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 74,200.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O1-JUN-1999 523,250.00 523,250.00 0.000000 9128272NI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 31-MAY-1999 523,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT O1-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 33 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST OCSD-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1999 - 30-JUN-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,420.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-MAY-1999 -21,420.00 -21,420.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -21,420.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-MAY-1999 21,420.00 21,420.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 28-MAY-1999 21,420.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 05/28/99 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,450.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-JUN-1999 51,450.00 51,450.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 51,450.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-JUN-1999 404,250.00 404,250.00 0.000000 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 31-MAY-1999 404,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-JUN-1999 482.28 482.28 0.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 482.28 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT D3-JUN-1999 1,451.86 1,451.86 0.000000 996085247 01-JUN-1999 1,451.86 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-JUN-1999 32.57 32.57 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-JUN-1999 32.57 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-JUN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 34 FAHR COMMITTEE Me ng Date To.B9. 07/IS/99 07/21/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR99-SS I 15(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-14, Authorizing the District's Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest District's Funds; Adopting District's Investment Policy Statement and Performance Benchmarks; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-40. SUMMARY This agenda item presents the annual review of the District's Investment Policy Statement to the FAHR Committee for consideration in the Committee's capacity as the oversight committee for the Investment Policy (Section 16.2). With adoption of the attached Resolution, the Board of Directors would readopt the District's current Investment Policy Statement, portfolio performance benchmarks, and monitoring and reporting requirements. The District's Investment Policy Statement is recommended for adoption for 1999-00, with no policy changes from 1998-99. The submitted Investment Policy Statement has received the Investment Policy Certification of Excellence Award from the Municipal Treasurer's Association of the United Stales and Canada. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A R 1w /.pond.Rep.I.a rd isle dx R-.ed +. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable(information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's current Investment Policy Statement was reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee (FAHR) on July 15, 1998, and adopted by the Board of Directors on July 29, 1998 (Resolution No. 98-40). The Investment Policy governs the investment activities of Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO), the District's external money manager, on behalf of the District. On May 28, 1999, the District's Investment Policy Statement received the Investment Policy Certification of Excellence Award from the Municipal Treasurer's Association of the United States and Canada. A copy of the letter of certification is included in the Investment Policy Statement. The District received its first Award of Excellence for the Investment Policy Statement in December 1996. The attached Investment Policy document consists of the Policy Statement itself, and the following eight appendices: A. Summary of Investment Authorization B. Treasury Management Procedures C. Investment Manager Certification D. Investment Pool Questionnaire (LAIF) E. Board Resolution No. OCSD-99-XX F. Sample Monthly& Quarterly Investment Program Monitoring Reports G. Sections of the California Government Code Pertinent to Investing Public Funds H. Glossary of Investment Terms Annual Review of Investment Pollcv The Investment Policy includes the requirement that the District shall review its Investment Policy annually (Sections 1.2 and 16.1). Likewise, Section 53646 of the California Government Code (the"Code") requires local agencies to review their investment policy annually, and readopt their policy at a public meeting. "�w.ae�a. e.ao.m naem a.wm+ase aw,a nv. e.a.w�.maan.m+s�mmc R-x ,. Page 2 Y This staff report presents the annual review of the District's Investment Policy Statement to the FAHR Committee for consideration in the Committee's capacity as the oversight committee for the District's investment program (Section 16.2). With adoption of the attached Resolution, the Board of Directors would readopt the District's current Investment Policy Statement, portfolio performance benchmarks, and monitoring and reporting requirements. Annual Delegation of Investment Authority Effective January 1, 1997, Section 53607 of the Code states that governing boards of local agencies may only delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest agency funds to the agency's Treasurer for a one-year period. With adoption of the attached Resolution, the Board of Directors would renew its delegation of investment authority to the Director of Financefrreasurer for a one-year period in compliance with the requirements of Section 53607. Each year, the Board of Directors will consider similar actions along with the annual reconsideration of the District's Investment Policy. Ongoing Monitoring Program Staff continues to monitor pending legislative and regulatory proposals in the public finance area for their potential impact on the District's existing financial programs. For example, the California Government Code (the'Code") currently allows local agencies to invest up to 15% of their portfolio in commercial paper, and an additional 15% may be so invested provided that the dollar-weighted average maturity does not exceed 31 days. AB 343, introduced in February 1999, proposes revisions to the Code which would permit local agencies to invest up to 40% of their portfolio in commercial paper, delete the maturity requirement; and specify that no more than 10% of commercial paper investments may be issued by a single corporation. At present, AB 343 remains in the Senate Local Government Committee. Staff will monitor the progress of this proposal, and should the bill be approved by the Legislature, staff will analyze the potential benefits and risks of the final statute with respect to the District's investment in commercial paper. Another bill, AB 1423, introduced in February, proposes revisions to the Code which would require local agencies to submit copies of their 2n° and 0 quarterly investment reports to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission, and require the Commission to maintain comprehensive information on local agency investments of public funds. At present, AB 1423 remains in the Senate Local Government Committee. If the proposal is enacted, staff will comply with the requirements. N.1 Mn4,P"MeWmN Av...A^V^b11WB m. ne""4a R"gMVI .,m 15(Qd. R—."e. lase Page 3 a A third bill, AB 530, introduced in February, proposes revisions to the Code which would allow local agency treasurers, upon approval of the local legislative body, to enter into "securities lending agreements." These agreements are similar to reverse repurchase agreements and possess leverage and credit risk factors. At present, AB 530 remains in the Senate Local Government Committee. Participating in these agreements would require a future change to our Investment Policy. If these legislative proposals are adopted by the Legislature in the current session, and signed by the Governor, they would become effective on January 1, 2000. Staff will continue to keep the Committee informed of the status of these proposals as they may develop. The only change that staff can implement without a modification of the Investment Policy is AB 1423. No changes are proposed. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Orange County Sanitation District's 1999-00 Investment Policy Statement 2. Resolution No. OCDS 99-14 H Avp.CroV0eMe1PaN/ige H.Mft%I88B Age a RepwbW)Bdllem 15(E1.J¢ R. 1rs Page 4 r t RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-14 AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS FUNDS. AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98.40 .. ... . . ........ WHEREAS, on July 29, 1998, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 98-40, readopting the District's Investment Policy Statement, and establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the Board of Directors may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest District's funds to the Treasurer for a one-year period; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the District is required to review its Investment Policy annually and readopt its Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific monitoring and reports. NOW,THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the authority of the Board of Directors to invest or reinvest District's surplus funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories, as provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the District's Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the date this Resolution is adopted, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. v Section 2: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy Statement of the Orange County Sanitation District, as set forth in Exhibit °A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt the following specific performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the District's Investment Policy: LIQUID OPERATING MONIES: The Short-Tenn Operating Fund will be compared to the three month T-Bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES: The Long-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 4: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit"B. and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5: That Resolution No. OCSD 98-40 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held July 21, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H\WP.DTAWDMIWSWESOLLMONS\19W00509914.DOC FAHR COMMITTEE NeetlR9oaoe rem.moo-. 071"10l 07/21/99 AGENDA REPORT 1WMNumber aem Number FAHR99-0 is(f) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: SEWER CONNECTION FEE WAIVER REQUEST FROM CITY OF YORBA LINDA HOMEOWNERS FAHR COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION Following a presentation from homeowner Arthur Newsham and considerable discussion, the FAHR Committee modified staffs recommendation to the following: 1) Deny the request of Gerald Nichols to waive sewer connection fees for himself and three neighbors for four residential homes located in Yorba Linda; 2) Approve a credit toward capital facilities capacity charges (connection fees)for the four parcels equal to the dollar amount of prior sewer service fees improperly collected, plus interest at a rate equivalent to the 90 day Treasury Bill. 3) Direct staff to: a. request an updated listing from the Yorba Linda Water District on property addresses not connected to the local sewer system within Revenue Area No. 2; b. identify those property owners from this listing whose sewer service fee has not already been removed from the County property tax roll, and contact them for verification of information; c. remove these addresses from the County property tax roll for future sewer service fee billings after receiving confirmation of no connection from the property owners; d. implement a method to receive connection information from the City so that properties are reinstated to the tax roll when connected. 4) Transfer funds equivalent to the amount determined in 2 above for all parcels improperly charged, in order to provide credits toward capital facility capacity charges for a period of 4 years. 5) Direct staff to develop a program for obtaining information on property addresses throughout the rest of the District boundaries, except for Revenue Area 14, that are also not connected to the local sewer service system and attempt to verify this H:Nw,E gggel Ape RepMklMp W AOema Repartsb)BPXem 15ft Rs , erm45 Page 1 information with the property owner for the purpose of removing these properties from the County property lax roll to eliminate future service fee billings. r 6) Notify all current property owners who are identified as not being connected to the sewer system, but who have paid annual sewer service user fees, that the annual sewer service fee will be removed from future property lax bills so long as they remain unconnected, and that they are entitled to either: a) a credit against capital facilities capacity charges incurred during the next four years, or b) a refund of sewer service fees, plus interest, paid over the previous four years or for as long as they can establish ownership of the parcel, whichever is less. SUMMARY On June 23, 1999, Gerald Nichols submitted a letter to the Board of Directors requesting that sewer connection fees be waived for his property and the property of three of his neighbors, all located on Grandview Avenue in the city of Yorba Linda, who are now attempting to connect to the local sewer system (see Attachment A). Mr. Nichols contends that because he and his neighbors have been paying the annual sewer service fee for the last ten years, which is collected as a separate line item on the County of Orange property tax bill, that the sewer connection fee should be waived. Mr. Nichols also is requesting an immediate and equitable solution for the other residents of the City of Yorba Linda who are exempt from the payment of these fees because they are not connected to a local sewer. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In fiscal year 1990-91, The County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County(now referred to as Revenue Area No. 2 since the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation XM OhAp.M.� Aga Re} %IMG-q ApeMa Reyab`LlW11pn 1W qx R. v Page 2 Districts as of July 1, 1998) initiated a residential sewer service fee of$55.00 per year s that was collected as a separate line item on the County of Orange (County) property tax bill. This fee was increased in 1991-92 to $60.00, in 1992-93 to $71.52, in 1997-98 to $73.00, in 1998-99 to $74.00, and will increase in 1999-00 to $76.00 per year. All property owners within the service area of the Orange County Sanitation District (District) with developed property, except for Revenue Area 14, are assessed sewer service fees which are collected through the County property tax bill (Revenue Area 14 collects sewer service fees directly from the Irvine Ranch Water District). The charges placed on the County property tax bill assume all developed parcels throughout the District boundaries are connected to the local sewer systems because most are connected, and the County Assessor's database does not include sewer connection information. The 1990 public notice that was mailed to every property owner within Revenue Area No. 2 (see Attachment B), declared that property owners were exempt from this fee if the property wasn't connected to the local sewer system. These property owners were requested to provide a letter of explanation in order for the District to waive the current fee and overlay the County's property tax roll database information in order to eliminate future billings. This was highlighted as question number one in the Q&A section of the notice. As requests to have the sewer service fee removed from the County's property tax bill began to come in, the Finance Department requested verification from the Yorba Linda Water District that these parcels were in fact not connected to the local sewer system. Due to the number of calls that Yorba Linda Water District was receiving from the District's Finance Department, they provided a computer listing of all property addresses within Yorba Linda that were not connected to the local sewer system (a copy of this listing was attached to the letter submitted by Mr. Nichols and is included in Attachment A). Finance staff then used this listing as a verification tool against all written requests that were subsequently received. The Yorba Linda Water District listing contains 890 property addresses that purportedly are not connected to the local sewer system. Of these addresses, 219 have been eliminated from the user fee program as a result of the written request from the property owner and another nine have subsequently been connected to the local sewer system. The amount of fees collected from each of the four residences located on Grandview since 1990-91 total $619.60. An additional $76.00 is expected to be collected in 1999-00, the fiscal year in which the connection permits are expected to be issued. If each of these property owners can provide proof of ownership back to 1990-91, the District will offset the sewer connection fee of each of these four homes by the total of past sewer fees paid as well as the 1999-00 assessment, or a total of$695.60 each. The sewer connection fee to be charged will be the lesser of the current rates or the proposed rates that, if passed, will be effective September 1, 1999. These rates range from $1,130 to $2,360, depending on the number of bedrooms within these homes. Staff will also be requesting an updated listing from the Yorba Linda Water District on property addresses not connected to the local sewer system within Revenue Area H kwdtabgeneaBooM Age Reg %lM mre Age Me Fewan]eanem 1510.ecc R-.ee: a Page 3 No. 2. From this listing, staff will identify those owners whose sewer service fees have not already been removed from the County property tax bill and contact them for v verification of information. After receiving confirmation, these addresses will be removed from the County property tax roll for future sewer service fee billings. Staff is also proposing to develop a program for obtaining information on property addresses throughout the rest of the District boundaries, except for Revenue Area 14, that are also not connected to the local sewer service system, and attempt to verify this information with the property owner for the purpose of removing these properties from the County property tax roll to eliminate future service fee billings. ALTERNATIVES 1. Upon verification of user fees paid by each of the four requesting property owners, grant a credit to be applied to the sewer connection fees or provide a refund equal to the amount of sewer service fees paid, but limited to the last four years. 2. Issue refund checks to these four property owners, and all others, as far back as proof of ownership can be established, for each year user fees were collected on the property tax bill in error because the properties were not connected to the local sewer. 3. Apply credit or issue refunds to current property owners, without regard to proof of ownership, for entire period fees were collected but service was not provided (1990-91 to 1998-99). CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Attachment A- Letter by Gerald Nichols dated June 23, 1999. 2. Attachment B- County Sanitation District No. 2's Notice of Public Hearing for April 18, 1990. 3. Letter by Arthur Newsham dated July 12, 1999 H.M ft� gendal WAgmC Repa,bIMB-W ApeMa ROKo 07B lem 15{B d= Remed-. a Page 4 ATTACHMENT A Y June 23, 1999 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Board Members: I am here on behalf of my 3 neighbors and myself(NewshanJYurges, Autovino, Loft).We are in the process of voluntarily installing sewer on our private street and connecting to the public system. The sewer line in our area of Grandview Ave was constructed in February of 1972 and the remaining pad of Grandview in 1974. In a letter dated May 26, 1999 to Mr. Daniel Ludwin,we requested a waiver of the sewer connection fee. Our reason for the waiver was due to the fact that our properties are being assessed the'OC SANI#2 USER FEE" for at least 10 years. We, obviously, wouldn't be charged this fee unless we had paid the fee to conned to the sewer at some previous time. We each received a response from Mr. Ludwin, dated June 8, 1999,denying our request and stating current ordinance does not allow staff to waive fees. The ordinance did allow for a refund up to four years, if we could prove we had paid the yearly assessments and should not have. While an ordinance may or may not allow"stall to waive the connection fee, the sewer connection fee can and has been waived because of wrongfully collecting yeady user fees and it has been done recently, according to sanitation district personnel. Since our request was denied,we have been doing more research into the "CC SANI#2 USER FEE" on our yearly tax bills from the county. We have spoke with the city of Yorba Linda, Yorba Linda Water District, County Assessor, County Auditor, and several employees at your Sanitation District. This initially was to see if we had paid to conned at some previous time. Once I was directed to the Sanitation District about this fee,it took about 1 minute for your employee to determine I was wrongfully being billed. I inquired how it was determined so quickly and was told there was a list indicating who was not connected to the sewer in Yorba Linda. I asked if there was some way to find out if my property had ever paid a connection fee and was told that the information was at the front desk. I visaed your offices last week to check about the connection fee and to verity in person what I had been told on the phone. I was unable to determine anything more about the connection fee, but did confirm the existence of a list of people not connected to the sewer in Yorba Linda. Sanitation District management is aware of this list and that homeowners in several other areas of the county, are being incorrectly charged yearly fees for sewer use when not connected to a sewer. It is unclear how long and how many owners have been overcharged, but is dearly in excess of 10 years in Yorba Linda with the Sanitation District's knowledge. More research will need to be done to determine how long this has really gone on,but I have been informed that some people in parts of the county have paid for 25 years in error. P Yorba Linda Water District mated this list of service address'not connected to the sewer system so the Sanitation District could correct its records in April of 1990. As of last week, no effort has been made by the Sanitation District to make these corrections. Sanitation district personnel confirm they have this list, have had discussions about n and no effort has been made or is planned to correct the erroneous billing of homeowners. In fact,the Sanitation District has taken the approach that the service address must realize they are being overcharged, figure out who is doing it and prove that they,themselves, paid it. Only then,would the Sanitation District refund the current year and 4 previous years per state law, regardless of now long the had knowingly been overcharging the owner. The Yorba Linda Water District list contains neatly 1000 service addresses in Yorba Linda,that originally were being billed the yearly assessment. It has been estimated, by the Sanitation District,that 60-70 percent of these owners are still paying the yearly assessment even though they are not connected to the sewer. Based on these numbers,the Sanitation District has over collected approximately a Half Million Dollars from Yorba Linda residents alone. Even if the allowed refunds were given to the 3D40%who have connected or realized the districts error over the last 10 years, more than $300,000 would have been over collected from Yorba Linda owners. This number is just based on one city and just since this list was specifically done to correct this problem nearly 10 years ago. This problem may have existed since the sewer lines were installed in the early 70's. I have been told that over collection is taking place in several other cities such as Brea,Placentia, Orange, and Santa Ana. Countywide,we easily could be talking about several million dollars in negligent over collection in the last 10 years. Exactly why our problem wasn't corrected 10 years ago I don't know. Certainly the yearly assessment would have been increased to cover the reduce number of service address'. Ina county of more than 2.5 million,the yearly increase couldn't be more than$.25 for a 10,000 household error. That would be 10 cities with the same size problem as Yorba Linda. The state ordinance allowing for refunds for four years would seem to no longer apply. That ordinance is for an unintentional error or mistake. This is a case of knowingly and purposely not correcting an over collection for which you were advised of nearly ten years ago. It could easily be conceived that the refund should be 4 years back from when you were advised to correct the problem. What we want is clear. We want our sewer connection fee waived due to gross negligence of the Sanitation District. We also want an immediate and equitable solution for the other residents of Yorba Linda,who should not have been paying the assessment. We feel this is reasonable, because the Sanitation District decided to nothing and continue to collect money that wasn'trightfully theirs. I have enclosed copies of the letters to and from the Sanitation District and the Yorba Linda Water District list. We respectfully request a written response waiving our sewer connection fee as soon as possible,50 we can proceed with our project. Sincerely, Gerald Nichols 5335 Grandview Ave Yorba Linda, CA 92886 f� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i . : June 8, 1999 pl. 'ntn9622an .xr�aY�c Ro ea.e,n Gerald A. and Diane Nichols 0- ;z 5335 Grandview Avenue ,_.v.......: Yorba Linda, CA 92886 10s"er a ��"p e SUBJECT: Orange County Sanitation District Connection Fees I have received your request dated May 26, 1999 to waive the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSO) connection fee. You stated that you have not been connected to the sewer, but have been paying OCSD user ma. fees. Our current ordinance does not allow staff to waive connection fees, but it era. does provide for a refund for up to four tax years. If you wish to obtain a F„ V.�, refund, please submit a request and documentation of the user fees paid, gene such as copies of property tax bills. Upon verification of user fees paid, we can issue a refund or provide credit towards the current OCSD connection fee of$2,360. la Hab+ If you have any questions, please call me at (714) 593-7300. o�,pe Pieuiroa smxo� rmm cur vert David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering ( DAL:gc 1`lYra nl.Hab H.Wp.dlalani;M(Wu %ETTERS06MI?Nidmis.dac d �6M Mnse .ay oa c: Patricia Haley, City of Yorba Linda Gary Slreed Iwrr acacn r�. r. 4 S# 4 �' "lo Pra'Kt Ne PUOIic✓6eR/,en0 Ne E�.+mnmenl[NvvgAFicell[rr[a,n WeStewdtN$y5[Bm5 May 26, 1999 P Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 Attn: Mr. David Luctmn Director of E gneenng Subject:Request for Waiver of Orange County Sanitation District Sewer Hookup Fees Dear Sir. We. the undersigned Yorba Linda residents,are. at our own expense, in the process of extending the existing Yorba Linda Water District sewer system to serve our respective properties. As part of the hookup fee for each parcel, the City of Yorba Linda is required to collect $2,360.00 for the Orange County Saritation District. Each parcel has been assessed an OC Sari 02 User Fee via the Orange County property tax rolls without receiving sewer service. Because of this assessment, we hereby request that the sewer hw u p fee be waived fa the fc1lowirlg properties: 1. Parcel Number 348-141 -06.Tax Rate Area 25-003 5321 Grandview Ave.,Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Owners of Record: Arthur D. Newsham and Betty J.Yurges 2. Parcel Number 348-141 -07:Tax Rate Area 25-003 5325 Grandview Ave.,Yorba Linda, CA 928W Owners of Record: Rodney W.and Margaret T.Loft 3. Parcel Number 348.141 •08;Tax Rate Area 25.003 6335 Grandview Ave.,Yorba Linda,CA 92886 Owners of Record: Gerald A and Diane Nichols 4. Parcel Number 348-141 -06;Tax Rate Area 25-003 530 Grandview Ave.,Yorba Linda,CA 92886 Owners of Record: Daniel J.and Kathy A..Autovira This waiver is requested because each of the above properties has already been paying the annual OCSD User F-ee. The attached provides copies of the Secured Property Tax Big for each of the identified parcels showing the User Fee charges. Annual assessment at this hookup fee effectively assumes that the necessary initial hoolalp fee has already been addressed for the subject properties. Therefore, we hereby request that the Orange County Sanitation District inform the City of Yorba Linda,in writing,that the subject Ice be waived for each of the identified parcels g additional information is required please contact Arthur Newsham at telephone no.(714)777-4089. Thank you 1 , _ct?� Gerald Arthur D. ewsham Rodney W.L Gerald A Nichols Daniel J.AUtwiro 5321 Grandview 5325 Grandview 5335 Grandview 5369 Grandview RI Betty J, Mar I T.L iane Nichols A4 wino 5321 ahindOiew 5325 Grandview 6335 Grandview 5369 Grandview Attachments(4) fPAGE 1 14: 47: S 27 APO 1990 ACCC.'-iMTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . . . . , . SERVICE ADBR .. . .. . . CITY 6 STATE . . . . . . . ZIP 4559= Ul GO;ODTUCY-MEATIDWS -7796ROSE R lURBA- INOA-CA-"'-"- 92686-- --- T✓ 59767-0 01 00300 LESTER D. FOSTER 3812 ROSE DR YORDA LINDA CA 92686 41914-0 01 ; 00600 YORBA LINDA FEED 3702 ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . , 56635- HUNTER W1 BASHA AVEYO R11 LINDA 92686 56635-0 Ot 01MO RDANUTAICHM HUNTER f60B2 WABA" VE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 92--1 �1—�1TJ301iICHARD�WOB1tB92�Ja ASH-AVE'- ORBAti INDA-CA-----92686-------- - 33633-0 Ol 01074 LOUZS STEALING I690I CHESTNUT ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 47335-0 of 01078 AHA ZACHAtt�6BSI CHESTNUT'ST—YOROA LINDA CA 92686 01 01080 R A iICMARDIOK 16871 CHESTNUT ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 13023-0 01 2500 KHAM TRAN 16871 CHESTNUT ST YORDA LINDA CA 92686 u 3IIT7=Y--07�2300�OflREST'MATFZECO-"-�6Y 0"flOSE'DR '1'pRO A-LSNOA'CA- --"-' -92686-- - -- ---' ----- 29722-0 01 02600 NANCY KVANCZ 3620 ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 41899-0 O1 D2700 TREVOR HUGHES 3562 ROBE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 F. 3Bi9-�280D?fA]f-AO55�5327105E�R 22253-0 01 02900 PATRICIA LEWIS 3342 ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 27376-0 Ol 03100 BAILEY MCCUNE 16e22 BLAKE ROAD YORBA LINDA CA 92686 .-26T1U=0—�L 03200ZXRI SIOPHERTMUFF- 31V ROSE-DR--'—NORBAtINDA-CA---- --926t16- -------111A�\\1- ---- - 00 JOB,-CONNETf�755 MAUNA LOA�vT BREA CA - 01 03700 LOBERTRRAI M. BEN80N 3745 MAUNA LOA BREA CA -- 69 03 03700 LORRAIZ- KELSO 3743 MAUNA LOA ST BREA CA 2 13- --03B00-MICHAEL�ERO--�]35TIAVNA�9AST- 'BflEA"CA"'— - 92 - 879-0 1 03900 ROBERT BRADY 3725 MAUNA LOA BREA CA 9 823-0 04000 JAMES BAIRD 3715 MAUNA LOA ST BREA CA 9 y - 200-CRR7D-BECH ]30�w RtaR 1 111Nm,:A 153-0 01 08300 DAVID VARON 3740 UNA LOA ST BREA 9 40-0 Ol 400 JACK TOLFORD 375 MAUNA LOA ST BR 9 'DAN IEL-DOTT6--' 0-MAUNAYOA- A ----'---� I--- - -- 61-0 01 OB ARD CIRCELLI 7 MAUNA LOA ST A CA 9 t 43-1 Ol OB700 SIZEMORE 3790 AUNA LOA BREA CA 1 3=0—OI�BBOO�A TAA 525-A E-D L'ACENTIA�A 0 38-0 Ol OBEID FAI SAL 2509 ROS PLACENTIA CA 0 04-0 01 OS012 LOWELL BE 2501 PLACENTIA CA 0 32=0—'OT -0981ACARY SUR ER -110 IENA -AVE-TLACENTIA'CA------'"--"" '- 0 -----"---"--- 79-0 01 OBB16 WILLIAI OLDE ADMENADE VE PLACENTIA CA 0 13-0 OI OB81B WHOM INGRAM ROMENADC A PLACENTIA CA 0 90=(ti--OT �BB20-NM TIALPAKO D ENAOE'TVE' �L'ACENTIAI - 0 - -- ]t-O 01 OBB22 AN CASE 10]7 P DE AV ACENTIA CA O I-0 01 OBB24 AVMONO P R 1069 PROM AVE PL NTIA CA O O�--O7��BB AYTA 061-PROM EN AA E-'PCAC IA A- 0- 1 -"--- ----- --'---' 9-0 O1 O 28RT NERT 1033 PROMENADE PLACE, CA 9 0 3-0 01 BB30 - AMMERSMITH 1043 PROMENADE AV CENTIA 9 0 ol "BBB AL HAT 03TPROMENA➢ETVE TIAYA 0- 4-0 Ot OB ERT C. PINCH 1044 PROMENADE AVE PLA CA 9 0 4 2-0 01 36 FRED J SEOLAK 1056 PROMENADE AVE PIACEN 9, -2 - O'i- 3B3B­DEORCE-E-HACKER--"-106B TROMENADE-AVE-" "PLACENTIA "- ""'----"'9 - - - -- -------- 4 17-0 08840 LARRY ROBERTSON 1080 PROMENADE AVE PLACENTIA CA 9 0 2 06-0 08842 EDWARD JOHN50N 1092 PROMENADE AVE PLACENTIA CA 9 0 79-1 Ardiwi 0884W-L WRENCE-WOELFEL-�1ID2-PROMENADE-AVE-P-ACENTIA-CA'- - "� - -- - -- - -- - -- 60- 01 08846 HAROLD N BENXAM 1108 PROMENADE AVE PLACENTIA CA PAGE 3 14:47: 50 27 APR 1990 ACCOM76. . ROUTE READ SEO NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY 6 STATE . . . . ... ZIPTour 6 442]I-0 04 i 00146 H.J. VAN PATTEN 16672 C0LDEN AVE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 31-LATHROP-DR—YORB Dk'CA - 926B 46912-0 04 05000 JOEL STORSTEEN 16641 LATHROP DR TOAD A LINDA CA 92686 15412-0 04 05100 HOWARD W. SHAVER 16631 LATHROP ➢R YORBA LINDA CA 92686 Zb7 - - - DO"'TONY7tIETRERII-16 "ASfANCHURY—YORBA NDAYA-- �12686 63145-9 -04 ,•'t 05500 MUTT E. LEE ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ' •;1 ' ] . 23395-0 ...04 T06300 L. P...MORGAN . .16661.LDIE ST ;1- YORDA LINDA CA 92686 . D-MARJ[IRT'T�NA DRBA-Of DR-GA�26Bh w4 .� 0110, 33113-0 OS - .-160 HELEN ADAMS 4411 PROSPECT. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1 - ➢B/8-PROOp"�583T"RIONTENCALF'CN�'ORBA-t1N0AYA-92686 34456-0 05 150 DON SEAMAN 4441 LARD LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 32812-0 05 185 MALCOLM WATKINS 4417 LARD LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 772-0 03 �95 RAMONP0E5�-4462 LARO'CN -YORBA'"LINDA-CA -92686 64972-0 0] _ 200 BAMON PETEp50N 4480 LARD LN YOROA LINDA CA 92686 63253-0 OS 200 BOVD COPENHAVEfl 44B0 LABO LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 XER 16892 NIGHTINGALE LN'YORBA LINDA'CA —9268 49021-0 OS 000 CBEGD 0 FOX 16992 NIGHTINGALE LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 49021-0 OS 1000 TON] SMDDVAL 16892 NIGHTINGALE LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -E-ROBINSON—lb9341N1CHTINCALE"QrYOROA-LINDAYA --92686 26096-0 05 1100 CLAUDE KASTENHOLI 16932 NIGHTINGALE LN YORBA LINDA CA 926B6 61663-0 -OS • • 1300 DENNIS HOGAN - 4471 PROSPECT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 2B.S3.u Do TCD NZR31N- TORDAZ DRYAD 260 55765-0 OS 1450 WILLIAM BURSE 4451 PALOMINO LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56122-0 05 1800 WILLIAM WEBSTER 4376 PALAMINO LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 710RK ATCHIRMtT>—4400 OALAMTNST YOROA LINDA-CA — 92686- 20899-0 ,OS 3000 MARK LLE CRAVENS - 4392 ➢SMOND ST YORDA LINDA CA 92686 40066-0 OS 3000 MICHELLE CNO---- ' 4392 OSMOND 6T YORDA LINDA CA 92686 22499-0 0.05 JIGO3200 RONALD TAYN0�7/2-OSMONDST YONOA'LINDA CA WE86 17164-0 05 3300 RONALD TAYL011 42M DSMOM ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 3 64-0 OS 3300 ROGER HALL 4282 DSMOND ST YORBA L1NOA CA 92686 �1906 4=0-05 4WD :SOON ' 17221 BASTANCHURY—YORBA-LINDA CA' '--92686 20089-0 _ • ,05 4000 FREO OSBOBNE = 17221 DABTANCHUpV YORBA LINDA CA 92686 l 36319-0 05 4100 HMMI 6AKAMOTO 17351 DASTANCHURY • YORDA LINDA CA 92686 15749-0 051T7WICOSNAY----T70 -1- ' =FTC—FOR➢AZ7NDAZA�2686- 64762-0 05 \ 5000 RUDY RANCEL 4102 PROSPECT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 31696-0 OS 5100 LYMAN CRALLE 4121 PROSPECT VORDA LINDA CA 92686 46946-0 05 OLOA GREEN ER'-4181 PROSPECT AVE CA ---92686 45637-0 05 5250 0 A GREEN 4201 PROSPECT AVE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 25637-G OS •5250 MIKE GARLAND 4201 PROSPECT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ` 00 U. M.ER"HAM 4202 MERSTARCHORV YORBA LINDA CA 92606 29899-0 OS 5450 U. I BA6HAM 4182 MERIEMA LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 29899-0 OS 5450 DAVID J AL-RAYESS 4182 MERIENDA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 30O-DOOCC7lS-G-BflINE9-47'6ZYIERIENDA�BAZYNDAZA -92686 PACE 4 14:47:02 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ EEO NAME .. ... . . SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY 6 STATE . . . . .. . ZIP U. 1-427MER IENDA YORBA-t,71MA CA- --92686 12262-0 05. 5600 LESTER KAT➢IB '{ '4122 MERIENDA " YORBA LINDA°CA 92686 46183-0 ' 03 ,5650 JAMES R MANVILLE 16➢131� BASTANCHURY YORDA LIMA CA 92686 - 700-CREO-TTTCO0.�-lE8T1-9ASTMiCMURY--y'ORBA-ttNDA-OA --9B6B 42535-0 OS ; 5800 HELENE 6 RUFRAN„'- 17122 MARDA .. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 62389-0 05 5850 C. C._GREEN 17126 HABRA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 9W�"'-05 -;;5900'C-CC+OREEM"�77 YJt'MARDA-�VE'-�YORBA-1:lNBA-CA -- --92bBb - — 't. [. 1 ..! ` r %�iliP wll l �. .eYDb!` Y t 'kK',' i 1S1M.I1. lY4'b5.44;; 'C�`s.' F '3. "+S• \ $ 't�... � 'r« ..IO1U7L vi/JU1D'1'I"iT{s✓�il �'+%!ET1.J3 19615-0 06 00300 cARV REE6E 17272 MARDA;. - �- YORBA LINDA CA 92686 IOIBO-0 06 00700 WENDELL. SOLESBEE 4131 SECOND ST VORBA LINDA CA 92686 ' 1 0=0— 06 05000-REBECCA-OLSCN ,+4232-VALIX"I]h.---:YORBA' . 62152-0 } ':.`06 ' ..OP100 TERRY BEAT < i L 4082;VM:LEY VIEW ' "YOIIBA.LINDA CA > 1 :9260¢; 1 _�+ y.;.• 69460-0 ::.06 :.3434 OCCUPANL:vN)<!f I +.•: ; ABPENOLON :DfE [ "YORBA-LINDA'M 926Im . PCB-➢EA�r/S51-EL— !AWN—VORBA-G7}BlA-CA�26B 32603-0 06. 03435 FRANCIS E ROM 4401 RUSTIC,RD VORBA LINDA CA 92686 .. a ..1- 1 26434-0 ,07 '005DO GUINOLAFF MARLIBA .; , 17691 IMPERIAL HWY YDRDA LINDA CA - - � _ 92686 22 CAA9AtOMA-------VORDA-GiIIDN-- a 9268 NES 50428-0 07 00700 VINCENT M JO 17651 IMPERIAL HWY YOROA LINDA CA 92686 23500-0 07 02100 BASIL LEWIS, 4122 CASA COMA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 3500=r------07�2100 ARYL— -"LEY----^013T'CASAt'OMA -YOROA-t1NDA-CA—^—f--•^'-92686---�--�— 51754-0 07 02700 EOWIWOREINER ,:4062 CASA LOMA YORDA LINDA CAS.' - 92686 - 32500-0 07 08700 MAURINE A VOCEL 17611,BASTANCHURY " YORBA LINOA�CA 92686 v - gTOOD�IIASTRNLNORY-Dt1M=H'OROR-t1NDAtt -9B6B _ 12784-0 07 08900 D. W. TODD 17971 BASTANCHURY YORDA LINDA CA 92686 37310-0 07 09400 RENA FINE 17997 OAK LEAF LANE YORDA LINDA CA 92686 .i 98=0--07'—'D9500-OMPANT SOYEUREKA �/QRBArtINDA-CA— -92686 61378-0 -''07 09600 N SPENCER ':BASTANCHURY YORDA LINDA CA fl•'f 499D9-0 UB 03900 KIM ZERBY - 9262 EUREKA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 8938�--OB—"99300�AABARA"JENSEN—^43D]�Lt1MOSA .'YORBArtINDA-CA -92686 - 29206-0 OB 04300 ELIZABETH V. .O'CRADY 4361 PLUMOSA, ' YORBA LIMA-CA '92686 - 41671-0 OS 04900 LIVINGSTON RICHARDS .18272 BASTANCHURY.:. YORBA LINDA:CA 92686 7 - BIFUO "ETT'C-SHAD B2B AS ANCMURY—YOROAt1NDR-CA- 92606 26830-0 08 05500 PHIL BENHAM 10254 BASTANCHURY VORDA LINDA CA 92686 20416-0 08 03700 PAM GIBBS 16245 BASTANCHURY VORBA LINDA CA 926116 592T=0 0B———­D5BOOTRTMlR-BA=CM­T825I-BASTANCMURY—YCRBAYtINDA-CR —92686 27439-0 09 .05900 SCENE GRAN T'l1 18241f BASTANCHURY YORBA LINDA:CA 292606 61144-0 08 :..06000 6 T MILLAReµ[; b `.181611BASTANCHURY.;, YORBA LINDA CA_. ..( 92686 P KUUEN 1 ASTCE IST4 BASTANCHURY----YORBA"tINDA-CA —9268 26063-0 OB 06130 PETER KARAOINES 18103 BASTANCHURY YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57016-0 OS 06133 PETER KARAOINES 18LOL BASTANCHURY YORBA LINDA CA 92686 --063D0-AARRET!TBCHLVTT .. .. 1ST"1 BASTANCHURY-.. ,YORBA--TMAtC - 9268�- _ 55498-0 08 06400 TOM NAKAMINE 181LI BASTANCHURY 2"YORBA LINDA CA 92686 37532-0 '.+'OB 06500 SELIIYN RAMSAY '18071 BASTANCHURY;.,,:YORBA LINDA.CA 92686 0-RRERNANIIE210025tA5TANCNURY—Y'ORBAYINOAZA '-92606 34385-0 OB 06700 RICHARD L DENICK 18021 BASTANCHURY YORDA LINDA CA 92686 12932-0 08 - - 06800 CHRIS DANIEL 18007 BASTANCHURY-- VORBA LINDA CA 92606 PACE 5 _ 14:47:54 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BED NAME .. . . .. . SERVICE ADDR . .. . . . . CITY 6 STATE . . ..... ZIP -' _ D-DDNAID�T'CEE 45TIIDHIO- YORHA-L'1NDA'CA^--. 269 17932-0` - ` 09 r. ems-07500 RONNY.C.;ANDERSON 4242 AVOCADO YORBA LINDA SA 7 92686 x 19141-0(. ,.. .: 'O9, .�} r ,;: 07600 TIMOTHY HENSHAN';.__::4240 AVOCADO YORBA.LINDA.CA 92686. 00-J.RMEOTOE�M8 VOCNDD--YORDAT D/r'M ---- s 08000 BETTY MERCURO, -. --._.4291 AVOCADO YORBALINDA CA . . :. 92686. 11137-0 09 08100 ROBERT E RECORD 4295 AVOCADO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 O"0HE REDERICK-^-4297' VOCADO '-YORBA-L- CA-CA '92686 11467-0 A Oq COB300.JUDY.LANKFORD t4293'AVOCADO :YORBA LINDA CA 92686 40231-0'� .j,49, � .OB400.MICHAEI_`aBROSAMER 1i?_.�,4303 AVOCADO "YORBA LINDA.CA x.'. 92686,.., y �s�i:' � -W7323=0------99 `OBE00-E0RiN1cR'IYRTCRZ—`L3TtYNOCAD0 Y0R0AtTN0P'CA 926H 37639-0 09 13050 C.H.. STANGER ,r 4362 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 65578-0 09 33100 ROBERT HAHN < 4362 LAKE - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 Z2343- 00'OAME3-MOONCE---4332-MEV1EH------YORBA-L-INDA-CA --7--92686 44377T0 09 '° _ 1340D OFRALli 'J AUDISS 4352 LAREVIEN YORBA LINDA;CA. 92686 '66OSB-0' ra09. �° 13410.MIKE'ELLIOTT... 4322 LAlE;VIEN YORBA LINDA CA, i 926866=78 %y 400-OCCUPANTAIUr--4242 LAKEVIEW YORDA'LIMA-CA . 926E 24706-0 09 13600 OCCUPANT 4242 LAKEVIEN YORBA LIMA CA 92686 24706-0 09 13600 HELLS FApCO TRIED N. I047I Bg6TANCHURY YORBA LTNOq CA - 92686 ILA 800-cccup ATICE 4391-LAKEVIEW YORBA LIMA-CA -Y2991-0�w.09 s.i.,pa 3850 OCCUPANT.'�.e ...g3Bl LAKEVIEH YORBA LIMA CA-, _.-;--� 92686 61612-0 10 0200D HOWARD BA%TER 4551 ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 S0 Y, —02I05'OTHOOSMAN -4575-ROSE'DR YORBA INDA-:A 92686-- 11]91-1 30 09100 WILLIAM CROW . 16651 MALCOLM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 r 11791-2 - 10 09100 STEPHANIE NEELD .16651 MALCOLM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 00'TTAR9-CRI`D•BECI T6EBGl1AtCOLT1VS—YORBAY"[NOA-CA-92686 17929-0 10 10000 DAVID DUNCAN 4839 ROSE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57169-0 10 10100 NGUYEN THINH 4841 ROSE DRIVE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -I552 - 0C/ NVTDS R000R`.....: 15721TA"ItLrt"PL—YORBA-LTMAY 92686,- 62827-0 . 10 102" CHUCK- MORENOA4 Alt '16701 CAMILLE YORBA LINDA CA 926B6 - C 20653-0 10 - .:(30300 MARK.W HILL a. i 7 4892 OEM LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92606 Iuv6'-O to B 14515-0 10 10500 DAVID LLOYD 4883 GEM LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52900-0 10 10600 LARRY E BURTT 4901 GEM LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . .. E1-tlf: YORBAY:INDAY 9268 .._ 13162-0 : 10 10800 JERALD SIMS 4931 OEM LN - - YORBA LINDA CA 92666 35140-0 -.! 10 109M EDNA L.:- BO%..tid•t4 .4941 OEM LANE:. YORBA LINDA CA. .92686 N 94S0EM'LN—�IORBg7.'[NOAY'A9268 27124-0 t0 11100 SHARON M PRIEBE 4942 GEM LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 3248B-0 10, 11200 LANCE DROWEN 4932 GEM LANE' YOREA LINDA CA 92686 EMITNET'-1'ORBA'CINDR-Cq92686- e 23245-0 30 '. T1 `y11400-NARY.CVPRIEN 5 .'4911:'ROSE DR.WU T ! YORBA LINDA:CA 92686 14]BS-0 - 10, %.X'. -'11500'WILLIM 'D�HROWN J, ..:4931,•.ROSE DR: F+J! 7 j'ORBA LINDA CA .T '.92686 1 10i DR o A R �26e 26731-1 10 11600 R MARKS 4941 ROSE DR. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 43396-0 10 12900 RAYMOND MOON 1"62 CAMILLE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 23458-0 to 30DUTCNY7SPRI01.5 ICLFPL—YmBAZLlNDA A R613 32467-0 - 10 17700 GORDON WILSO 46665 ROSE DR PL "YORBA LINDA CA 92686 32935-0 10 17700 OCRDON-NtLSON 4622 ROBEpi ' - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 48853-0 10 18100 RAYMOND A RAUSCH 4611 PROSPECT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -60860-0 10 18200 FRANK MCGILL 4619.PROSPECT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1'nSL 6 144 47;56 27 APR 1990 ACCOIA4T8.. HOUTE READ no NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDS . . . . . . . CITY b STATE . . . . . .. SIP , .0730 WARD-11ARRE —4542-SANTE-FE--YOROA-7NOA-CA --------- �. •29274-0 11 1910D„BNIRLEY',R7CHARDSON 4661 SANTA FE '. YORBA LINDA CA. 72686 + n,:G rttr iHAls- 5, .,.c v'„ in t 1 .i,NRtlw•4.7 Y4�'Cu„ :f'. ; 61147-0 12 06000 RICHARD NOCK 4041 COLLINS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 -43TI3=0--� 0-GATES-tYOM---173BB�L�AOON+^-,'YDRSA-t INDAy.M-- -926B 35116-0 12 1230D FRANK PRONE '.:4631 VALLEY VIEW YORDA,LINDA,CA[. 92686 ' 1' 354B1-O...; .SQ ' +i?,112500 LOU19 H. 'NEUBHAFER + VALLEY VIEN,!i l '.:YOR➢A LINDA CA?... 92686 ' :.I .- - O-RAND1tICNOLt^-4S91-BSflODAY 'YDRAO I INDA-CA -9E6B6 15373-0 12 16000 YOW SHIUN CHI➢U 17472 EL CAJON YORBA LINDA CA 92686 •! 58865-0 12 16000 DORIS PATTERSO�N 17472 EL' CAJON YORBA.LINDfA.CA 92686 ., - •; 1.•: 1I, .. $Y"N%Oi'.lG ..k.;. 1Y.Y. `P'a?RSBEA•+ I, ' . r1 !. 51019-0 13 00900 JOE MENLO 491E CASA LOMA YORDA LINDA.CA 92686 44291-0 13 03100 THOMAS R OTIS 4054 CASA LOMA YORDA LINDA CA 92666 .3005=0--- 3�3900710NA -R7 RAVY�-17032tERENE-DR ORBA- 7INRA-CA;- -92686 ,.r 36451-0 13 tt. 06B00 JOHN ,LINGER 1 "' 17:12 MEADDNVIEW 1 'VORBA LINOA'CA 92686 t 61624-0 13 ,,06900 WM 'Al _6DANIEL,f A ,, I7832 MEADOWVIEM, YORDA LINDA:CA '.. - 192686 E-MACCFaW785271EADONtlTBW--YOROA-LYNOA-M9EbB 42850-0 13 07.00 CARY MADISON 4662 WOODHAVEN YORDA LINDA CA 92666 , 11470-0 13 00300 IRVING 8 CAULKING 4652 CASA LOMA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 , TT470 1 . '.1✓1.; 'W: b: CC LUrP,A;YN1:T�;A.tyr.1-4r5 '•6' u2s lC A.lShAa'-TtdO1AM;AH VA, . . :.:Y.YO'ORNB AArttp.1NDA1-'.0 rA.,A-- --7 +2668t46 0 1349 09700.J OB L 9268 .5.00 aIN,A 6 -. ;--•- • . 39527-0 14 03500 FERDINAND STAUMOM 19101 AVOLINDA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 7 •o -4093b= i0360v RICNARD-VENTDRA�'19081-AAV=NDA--^-YORBA-LYNDA-C --92686-- - 22615-o v.74 4 �'03710 JOHN DUHON + �' :iBOb1:AVOLINDA ( YORDA LINDA.CA ' 't 92686 . 0641-0.. ;'14 y1,ra03B00 EVOENE ELY 18091 AVOLINDA; pal •..YORBA L1NOA,CA T;. �, 92686 OO-MApL�JpERL7140---I8021TVOCITIDgyy'OR9A-t INDA-CM•--'�9Q686 042 AVOLINDA Y 11890-0 14 04300 F. T. BOONE 18OROA LINDA CA 92686 17296-0 14 04400 CARL IIRSCHKY 18062.AVOLINDA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 T3934T7'4�^ Oi500'ROBERT,'.'CVSIWN- HOB?AVOCINCAT, ^,-YORDp-tiND r tQ68 27Ba 1-o -14. !r y04600 BRUCE,BAINy L :Y 18102 AVOLINDA N" YORDA LINDA�CA:n ,. ! 92686 �+ ' • 1 14605-0 14 - ,}k'07890� A.A.ADAMSA R5C1 Av.nL.'4742.PLUMOSA;CHUStf '� YORDA LINOA.CA.: r y 92686 Z9 - 900�ERAL➢INE�OSTER—iH272-AVOLYMOA--.,ORBp-L'TNOAYA� 92" 46555-0 14 13000 ARNOLD COUNTS 4836 OLINDA-..'. YORDA LINDA CA 92686 28990-0 14 13300 DR. R. -C. COCHRAN 4902 OLINDA YMBA LINDA CA 92686 2548 - .;+ 9007DAVE KMMTIRB-4752 Y AIN-B ,',IrV'-YOROA-LINDA CA -9Q6B 25486-17 ! ' 1��y�[a ,iS90D,JOHN WOANEq �'h, .,.4752 W11N 8Tr^.,!y ''e:; YORDA LINUA.CA. 92686'r 19" -0 -l4• � 1 1t •:16200.RONALO iJ:HLURAN , ," '/ 4732 NA IN 1..! 'N' X! :YOROA LINDA,CA.; 1 . i 92686 �y 63274 0 14 17900 BRANDT�UCKS, 4722-MARK AVE. , LINDA CA 9268(r�--�3 R9716-0 14 1850D JAMES K .➢UCMAr 4911 SHAW AVE. - YOR➢A LINDA CA 92686 29716-0 M 1116D JAME9 E .LE, jA 4911 SHAW LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 ti1720 �3�r-IH60V"R'AAL-iEEAeT-4921"SHAN-LANE?'�YOROp-LYH➢AYA . . "'-'92686- 6I720 ,1:{' . 14*' •''18600 PAULIMERTFELDER 1 4921.SHAW'LANE i'A I I - YORBA LINDA CA:.. 92686 44143-0 14 `119000 CHARLES E.ROGERS j.4872 SHAW LANE 4, `YORDA LINDA CA. - 92686 I17 - E9-WACREA—BS2' .-- -.. . IORDA-tIN➢AtA '-92686 39499-0 14 19100 PAUL H ROSS' 4891 PARK PL:. YORDA LINDA CA 92686 IB577-0 14' 19400 WILLIAM N LUTES 4921 PARK,PLACE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1 21 BA7NDA-CR --9 686 ,I��T,i,� ,,�'IR„t�i� �;r�+ % �IA,+B_ 1 1 x ! i ry 1 s •' I s �',•1Ri 'sic^'+•srs-n+•v+r.,.-.r..v.•....•...r.n-Ie..+,.1...�•n^,..•.... ... . . . . . . . �/ O 'PAGE 7 . . 14:47t 58 27 APR 1"0 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BED NAME .. . . .. . SERVICE ADDR .... . . . CITY 6 STATE . . ... .. TIP CCUPATlr 131-YDRBA-MMOA—l•ORBA-LINDR'CA —�268 „ 53551-0.� 14 21700„STEVEN A CASTALES 10141 ,YCRBA LINDA, YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 6 pry OD-O 28105-O.Ly c,11 inl 22600„O;�PV,.• .HOUSE Vo •. LEMON STREET � YOROA LINDA CA .. '92686 ZZ.— ---�a^�—aa7a0-o--v-/10 � 0— YGRBA-tMA-0�S6B6 /5682-0'10 "'' 14 22800 C. H. EICHLER 4852 EUREKA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . , 10765-0 14 22900 0. V. HOUSE'. 4682 EUREKA, VORSA LINDA CA 92686 r a1T+.•`9A•S,' 44A', !Io r'+IJ}`i,r.J j;et I <r�rC s-ktN ,: r. :: 1 ^- : . .. -_ _ ` M.0 . ,i3AeIV dd { 1 M, I ..:., Fl .., - .. � rY�'s •.'r',}.1 3 .H.Yr r, ,r Pq B•5,T00' 0..Mi40..�87TSCHO —t VO;rR BA-IZINJ DA- R �26B 2 -01 01 WUARV 4826 100 Y.L SER 62 � i !'�: xw♦•.rtM �1r 'J SCHOOL-BT YORBA LINDA CA 92686 42931-0 15 03200 OCCUPANT., 18471 YORBA-LINDA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 0 4 �1933 0350➢TAKMEW PRDFT lA-4952vAtENCTA '(ORBA'L'INDA-CA— 2686 °53962-0 1 ¢5 I w' 03600 LAKEVIEW.;PROF PLAZA-,4961 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 .. • 17581-➢ ,>' Ir,¢5j')15K,! ' , 0380D NATHAN'MOISEDFFh Y l;'4932 VALENC IA .�)YORBA LIN➢A.CAfA - .92686' No� 9ITAKEVIEW YORBA-t)NOA-cq 92686 55435-0 15 - 04300 JOHN ADOT 4801 LAKEVIEW VORBA LINDA CA .+ 92686 12523-0 15 04500 JEFF ROSS ARROYO ST YORDA LINDA CA 92686 bD0-JEFF-ROSST-., T^-4B6V�IACENCIAti'ORBA-L-IN➢A-CA - -9268 -33769-0 r •"1�Y5." 04900 4EOROE A-SULLIVAN4801 LAKEVIEW .YORBA LINDA CA 92666 59992-0 •15 5' 05150.ANTHONY,.FRI8CO 4802 LAKEVIEW YORDA LINDA CA 92686 FiSEN'YOIIIOND008T-479Z-CIIKEVIEA— VORBA-rINOAYR--T26B pWJ 311833-0 15 05200 ROBERT COMET 18551 ALTRUDY LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 MJ 32B60-0 15 05300 ALAN D RIES 18597 ALTRUDY LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 a - - 90tTCORNEICA-MEYER—ZBb02-/1LTRV0YZTI—'�'ORBgTINDA�A-----�2686 67429-0 15 05600 EASTON CRAWFORD 4672 LAKEVIEW - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 32530-0 .- 15 05603 WALTER,CHRISTENSEN 4682 LAKEVIEW VORBA LINDA CA .92686 - 00-OEORCE Fr-CO M2-B-CAKEVIEIi—'"'YORDA-taMAYA�68 41236-0 13 06000 MAX LONOWITH 10552 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 41236-1 13 06000 HELEN LONOWITH 18552 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �Z9 - 12 U5MU-SAM C-CATIMH------18382'TIRrENTE-E YQRBA7.7NOA-CA 92686— — 55426-0 ':15 ` "06400 RICHARD R LOVEJOY 4663 AVOCADO ul ;; ;YORBA LINDA CA A26B6 37436d 15? , J •:.r06500 TRAVIS FINDLV -1661 AVOCADO YORBA LINDA CA { 92686 'y pE6TEMETER '59 TVOCADO-------YORBAYINOA--" 92686 < 37I59-0 15 06700 CEORCE J LOEFFERT AVOCADO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 43099-0 '15 06800 ,8 8 RICHARDSON AVOCADO 1, ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 .w ,y A lV��IRK'JORNS017—�8732-BEN-=MOND— ORBAZYNOA-CA �26B , BRENT WALLIMSFORD +i ASBI LAKEVIEW ;VOROA LINDA]1420-0' `.17800 y • W.✓ • .. fJ D• '.T. �rl 't BUar • •J' ''49J1, t.CC 1. ' '.vr „i: (,A• .! n. 1070E-0 16 0020D CALVARY BAPT, CHURCH .0002,AVOCADO YORDA LIMA CA 92686 i TO - 00-u .CCOPAT7f ip�7002-AVOCABly VOR➢A'M .92686 35929-0* ]6"'^ ' '00300 NI LLIAM H LAND 1 r, A972 AVOCADO :�YOROA LINDA ,CA .92686 _. I° y. �•. .„ .34660-0' 36 ,r(•,+'•• 1.00400 NAMES GREEN A962,AVOCADO. ,VOflBA.LINDA ,CA ... .-. .1. .. . oCADO�'OROA'1:-INDAZA�9:`6E6 50290-0 36 \' .00500 LEM VAN NATTA 4892 AVOCADO YORDA LIMA CA 92686 65293-0 '16 00600 ROBERT WILLIAMS 18762 DE VILLE DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �3694 - ff"D➢UCLTSBOCIr�1B7B2�EVSLZFOP--'/OROA-72M ZA --92686 .. -66322-0 ^ ;:16 ' 00800 R. SCOTT SMITH 113802 DEVILLE of 'YORBA LIMA CA 50938-0 '.'U6 00900 ERIC HELMLE 18922.DE VILLE DR YORDA LINDA CA 92686 627 RICHAR C.CR 18793 DEVIRFDR—YORDA LINDA CA .92686 - 28057-0 n.- 16 -•'. .. 01100 RICHARD C.CRNM , 18773 BE ➢R. YORBA LINDA CA 92666 _ 20087-0 .16 O1Z00 D WILLUM90N ]8773 DE VILLE RD YORDA LINDA CA 92686 4s� O 1•AOL D 14:45:01 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ EEG NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDS . . . . ... CITY 6 STATE ....... IYP 300"CRATC-W�AHL 1873t'OE-VItLE DR—YORBA-tINOA-M 4a542-0 _ 16 01700 8EN COLAMARINO - 80752'HAVEN LN YORBA LINDA CA 44542-1 - 16 - 01700 COLDNELL BANKER';-, a. 18732 HAVEN W -YORBA LINDA CA O'TICOARVEY-'CtARK 2 752-HAVEMtN—�IOROA-tITID 12916-0 16 '` 01800 RAY GARDNER 18762 HAVEN LANE YUBA LINDA CA 92686 12916-1 16 01800 MICHAEL BALLINGER 10762 HAVEN LANE YUBA LINDA CA 92696 eA 21754-0 ' 16 - , 02000 MELINDA LINDLEY : 18792"HAVEN LANE YORBA LINDA-CA 92686 . ' ' 66418-0 16 ;.02100 PATRICK FLANICAN ;-•j138B02:HAVEN.LANE ,'.1,�• PORDA LINDA CA 92686 - 30'YtINA S t8 801"HAVEN LAW VORBA LIMA CA - —92686 42943-0 16 025DO NINA ILSO 10781 HAVEN LANE YDRBA LINDA CA W686 27047-0 - 16 023D0 DAN NILBON' IW7 HAVEN W YORBA LINDA CA 92686 '183310�b—^'026OOtt'"FItEVDEN8ER0ER 19751 MVEN-LANE--YORBA-L-INDA-CA 92686— - `18331-0 16 . 02700 DONALO 'J.,.BIMMONB -`ii1B791 'HAVEN,LANE YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 23362-0 - 16 .02920 FRANK MUTH . .7,.,. :.4712_FREDERICK ;1.... YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - -• ERTRAM-CMRM 469.FREDER7Ck'--YOPBA-tTNDA-CA— 9268 19357-0 16 03000 JEFFERSON 0 LOCKWOOD 4692 AVOCADO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 21319-0 16 03100 JOHN C NARFIELD 4682 AVOCADO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 � — IS 03200BRRBARATBE BEY --AVOCDO — VORBALM A 2686 5bZ4D E � —( ; VORBA LINDA"CA 926865 ' SS :,-' 4662AVOCADO - 1 37171-1 16 03400 MICHAEL VARANELLI f" 4652 AVOCADO -- <, YORBA LINDA CA 92686 I . 500-RA4MOND-SPENCO—4692-AVOCADO--YORDA-LiN➢A-CA '9268 35866-0 16 03505 JOHN E. BURK 18812 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 50537-0 16 03600 JAMES C. SELLERS YORBA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 —52M3--O- ----- 0D�OHN'CASSIDY,. '19782'0R1£NTE�ORBA-tYNMA A- --92686— - 57796-0 36 03800 RONAL➢ HE➢B• 18792 HUMMINGBIRD YORBA LINDA CA 92686 16213-0 16 - 03900 JERRY CLAY.TON 18802 HUMMINGBIRD W YORBA LINDA CA_' 92686 O'TAOM�701 YORBA-LANE—YORBArtINDA-CA 92686 — 60971-0 16 04050 B DAVID ETTE11 4727 YORBA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 60979-0 16 04050 MARK FORTNEY 4727 YORBA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 0-STEVENBERMA N ' .4741-1'ORBA-LANE—YORBA-LINDA-CA '92686 26050-0 16 04150 NM 6IL8ERMANN "-4742 YORBA LANE YORBA LINDA-CA - 92686 33866-0 16 04200 JOHN L BR04M.,_ 't ..4722 YORBA-W ;� YORBA LINDA CA'. 92686 4 ullba-v 16 p-VALTER-Bl1E�-Y'ORBAYN—y'ORDA-UNDA-CA 9268 54172-0 16 04400 FRED BRICKNER 4712 YUBA LANE YGRDA LINDA CA 92686 12445-0 16 04500 FRANK L RICKER 4702 YORBA W YORBA LINDA CA 92686 A - BA GROA-LYNDA-CA —92686 53251-0 - 16 „9. 047DO NILLIAM F.DAVIS :r�4632`YOPBA LANE1 .�„ YORBA LIMA CA 92686 . 48412-0 - 16 04B00 FRANK ATIET : -.10820 OR IENIE_OR:, YORBA.LINDA-CA 92686 -J - i900-FANOALT-=RIDOF'-7B9B2'ORIENTE—YORBA-LINDA-TA�268 2741" 16 03200 D L SAGMILLER 4741 OHIO YORSA LINDA CA 92686 49435-0 16 05300 S. J. NHITESELL 4731 N. OHIO ST. YORDA LIMA CA 92686 500-RICL]'AM�fYER5 i"7 Hll) DRBA--IMA-CA�--92686 E 27031-0 1�., 05,700 ERIC A HELMLE IBBB1 YDRBA LINDA YORBA LINDA CA -x- 92686 -. 35768-0 16 05800 CEO. R. DELAND YORSA LINDA-BLVD., YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 W FRIEND OF-COBAVITCH 19045'YORBA'LINDA-'—YORDA LINDA"YA 9268 66338-0 16 0640D FRIEND BF LUBAVITCN 49045 . DHI LINDA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52207-0 16 U640D RM. B. BUPOIC 4942 N. OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 T409 S00-JERAYTTOMAl�—i932'OHIO'3TPEE'f--YOPBA�L'INDA-:A —9268 22528-0 - 16 06600 LESLIE F. : DECKER' 4912 OHIO ST: 1 YUBA LINDA CA 92686 ;/ _ 34439-0 16 06700 CEORGE BTUTESMAN .-488B'OHIO ST YUBA LINDA CA 92686 bTlOO-ADOCP"OR 9268 5B375-0 16 06900 NUELL C. LUNDE 4072 CHID ST. YUBA LINDA CA 92686 46424-0 16 07000 D. B. LUNDE 4862 OHIO YUBA LINDA CA 92686 'M ID W0-LYNNIANE—YORBA-=NDA-CA '92686 �� O 'PAGE -9 14:46:03 27 AM 19" ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BED NAME . . . I . . . SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY W STATE ... . ... ZIP V7I9SDON-KRPAT1 ---cYNNZTNEZ07'Y- YORBA-CJNDA-CA�2686-- _ -37042-0 16 07800 CARL E. SCHY 19032 ORO VERDE LA YORRA LINDA CA 92686 .-51073-0 16 08100 DR. R. SCHNELL 19082 ORA.VERDE YORBA LINDA CA 92686. P{2-1 1b .BSSO NI CL 1�011 OEN2— 1-2S RO ERDB—YORBA't INDA-CA '-92686 47248-0 16 08600 ROBERT J LANDERS 19031 ORO VERDE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 29254-0 16 08700 LEON J FARROUI 19021 ORO VERDE YORDA LINDA CA 92686 0"UBEN7RODRTOpE7-------2907COR1ENTE-- YORBA-L-INDA-CA�268 1 46929-0 16 09200 JUDY A. HEMPHILL 19111 ORIENTE" YORBA LINDA CA: �. - 92686 " •• « 56159-0 16 - 09250 HOWARD A TOWNSEND 'ORIENTE - YORDA LINDA CA 92686 - • 'S ! 4Dblb-o 16 00-ED-R 29077-RTEN 1-DR--YOROA'CINOA-CA ---92686 48619-0 16 09420 DONALD WALLS 18995 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 43012-0 16 09WO WILLIAM TAYLOR 18991 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 40092-0 � 16 09700-WILLIAM OONE2 ' 'S. 45%-VALLEGITD - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 25706-D 11 5 09910 FRANK VILARDi I8992 VILLA TERRACE VORBA LINDA CA 92686 « 990-PFILLTP ROBSI---10997-VI=A-TERRACE-'YORBA-LYNDA-CAI 92686 1 21043-0 16 09995 JACK HAMLETT 18991 VILLA TERRACE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1 14437-0 16 10000 ROBERT P KENNEDY 18971 VILLA TERRAC YORBA LINDA CA 92686 IODICEDRARD-MIL1ER 1961-VICLA71ERRAC-YCIMAr 1NDA-CA --92686 47590-0 16 10500 GEORGE HANINGER 4581 VALLECITO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 28309-0 16 10700 JOHN C LCRAND 4598 DANITA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 22340-0 16 lu/bu WARREN ROBBER45H8'DANTTA'CARE—YORBA-L"INDA-CA --92b8b- 26668-0 16 10800 DAVID FREEMAN 4562 DANITA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 38707-0 16 10900 WILLIAM C F AU 4532 DANITA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -SBb00-0 36 13100 ROBEORY-CARDOZA-4502-DANITA LANE-' YORBA LINDA-CA --92686 22450-0 16 11100 ROB ERT A KILLBKE- 4351 DANITA LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 224SD-0 16 .11200 T. B. MC KENNEV - .4351 DANITA LANE - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 00-WM. F. MOOR-4771-DANITA LANE—YORBA LIMA-CA 9269 - 53161-0 l6 11500 WM. F. MOORE 1881 DORIEN LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 4UH70-0 16 1150D RICHARD 9 6PAIIq OW I8811 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 NRD J.D6VSRIW 18771'"ORIENTE * YORSA LINDA'CA /2686- 57067-0 16 11600 RICNARD J,DAVER[N 10771 ORIENTE * YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . 4 S 27200-0 •17 00200 M. K. GENTRY 19411 YORDA LINDA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ` jwB4D-O 1/ 025D�BAAID>:Y-T KTTT--1940T BATINDA--YMBAY- WN A 92686 19441-0 17 00300 PRESBYTERY LS RNCHOB 19301 YORDA LINDA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52648-0 17 00390 L. R. PEVER TERI PALM - - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - -3 - UD413 JEROME�EST--T93g2 Sly-ST'- ORDA-YNDAYA 2686 23059-0 17 00425 NORMAN SPERLING 19350 EASY ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 33328-0 17 00500 W R LARGE 19370 EASY ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 057D-DATTBAEi( I9]69-EASY'6'T -YORBA-L-INOAtA- —92686 19996-0 17 00530 CHRISTINA FULTON 19363 EASY ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 58909-0 17 00"0 M GENE PARKER 19353 EASY ST YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 . ( , 24163-0 17 00550 PAM RANDALL 19320 MICKEL LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 11"1-0 17 006M WILLIS A FOGLER 193B2 MICKEL LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 5411 - RADTA9SA7i --T93B4-HILKEC'CANE-YORDAT NDAZA "-926V6 - 56338-0 17 00620 FRANK BR I TTELL 19390 MICKLE LANE - >YORBA LINDA CA 92686. 53716-0 17 00625 FRANK BRITTELL 19390 MICKEL LANE I YORDA LINDA CA 92686 45 B AIIT.-WOEFINGER'"19388-MTCKET-CW11-1'ORBA-'OMATA '-926B i 16993-0 17 00700 ROSEMARIE WARREN 19393 NICKEL LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 29063-0 17 00710 DOUGLAS R MACMILLAN 19373 MICKEL LANE YORBA LINDA CA 92beb B72TALM----------1ORBA"LIIIDAYA �26BI �O U PACE 10 14:.49.05 27 APR 1"0 ACCOUNT6. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . . . .. . SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY 6 STATE 71P �SSST-a—T/ OOBOO�M-MCCORMCK--9742-PP4t -1'ORBA- :INDA-CA— 92686 61984-0 17 0095D DR STANLEY A KALLER 4732 PALM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 2686 31699-D 17 00967 MARY T. PERRY 19270 COUNTRY WOOD YORBA LINDA CA 92686 23572-0 17 00975 H.E. LAMANCE 4720 PALM YORBA LINDA CA 92666 - 0�"AMES' WINS-4720-FALYI ORBA't71NA-CA— 14992-0 17 0098D H.E. �LAMANCE 1 - 4720 PALM r - YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 f 1499Z-1 17 - ^. b09B0 4AMES_2RWIN 1 {� "47M PALM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 4 `475R "ONACO'F-'AEI41'-7592TAtl1 YORBk-LifmA-CAS--9268 32926-0 17 { 01100 FRED NICKELSON 19414 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 31621-0 17 01200 WALTER TAMULINAS 19416 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 OOrti120'CVIB�'IONAL2"-19420-0R 1ENTC—�_ YORBA�-INOA-CA =^26B6 204" 17" 01400-JOHN VIERRA - - gY,)A424",OR[EME YORBA.LINDA CA f - - 92686 It 47101-0 17 "01500 EDWARD W. .VAN VL1ET,;•19432`OR IENTE 4 -YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . r... H E YORBAtTNOAy:A 26-6 12532-0 17 01920 OEOROE ORIBMER 19321 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 26363-0 17 01925 KEITH VAN HOESEN 19311 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 2000-STEVE7IARRISON--459,tPALM VORDA-LiNOA-CA—�—^ 21226-0 17 " ' 02150 CARA CRIMES 4542 PALM YORBA LINDA CA ` - •¢' I0938-0 17 02170 HOWARD JACOBS ,19406 VIA D CABALLO YDRBA LINDA CA 220D-DPNNT-MACCOR t94t6-41A-DklSABACLEr-YORBA-t1NDA-CA � .CI y � ,�•�CY '^ :n;.•'i 42370-0 17 02200 LORRAINE C BRIAN 4542 PALM YORBA LINDA CA r 4 47600-0 17 02210 JIM BOSTICK 19464 VIA D CADALLO YORBA LINDA CA I� Q U^C Qpu -54283��7-02300-ROBERT'W JOHNSMN 436W1A-DLL-CABA—YORBA't INDA-tA 23928-0 17 '02400 KENT RUESTER 19444 VIA D CABALLO YORBA LINDA CA v { y} C 66034-0 17 02420ANTHONY FERRARO 19459 VIA D CABALLO YDRBA LINDA CA 49�!]A"D-CAOAL'CO—YOIIBA't1NDA�A . .,.'rr"°I 45730-0 17 02550 ALLEN BRIAN 19439 VIA D CABALLO YDRBA LINDA CA 39898-0 17 02600 IRIS PREVTT 1942Y VIA DE CABAL YORBA LINDA CA CJ. •' ♦�i.` �O84i=0—TT�02S�O-0ENNIBTMOVSE 9419�JIA'DECCAB-- vORBA-t1NDA­CA'^--� 31903-0 17 02640R P COOPER 19332 VIA D L CIELO YDRBA LINDA CA 61726-0 17 02700 ROBERT H DALE 19332 VIA DE LA Cl VORBA LINDA CA �632 - NZDRRICAN— 19372-VIA 0 L C'IELO YORBA LINDA"CAr—� Py, 1 1� •7 20329-0 17 02800 EOUARD SEAY 19372 VIA D L CIELO YORBA LINDA CA I qI 1 'y i• Cv ,�_ 20329-0 17 OZBOo DDUDLAB DODKE 4502 S. PALM YORBA LINDA CA9 BSVSTANLtYPA1iCOH6K7--44BZ-PAt7fY0RBA-LYNDA­:A V . ` 38854-0 17 . ,. . „.�02900 FRED R. HEXER ,';4452 PALM,'':tlrt YORBA LINDA CA • �q?,> > .r r 32620-0 -17 D3000 ARTHUR OEROES �,4431 PALM DR. YDRBA LINDA CA �. 1'1rl�J'R9,.1. : . 00—f.ALRVPATTBON�4iBf"PALl1 "'VORBArt7N0A�:A� /PML �. f f'1r'0•.1 I8230-0 17 03300 MOON KVI KO VIA DEL CABALLO YORBA LINDA CA . �, :�j�tr•. t2' . 16358-0 17 03400 ROLANO E BIOONOER 19179 VIA DL CABAL YORBA LINDA CA 37I00��7�U.wu T NOR-CA�T ' 19411-0 17 07605 SV6AN KAlIN ' L•:19161 VIA'DELCABA VDRDA LINDA CAS L 21019-0 '17 ,: 03610 JONN F.MC CAR711Y �. ;IY9171 VIE.DELCABAL " YORBA LINDA CA. - 92686[ - -VEL-%=A�-'V RRA tTNOA��268 65443-0 17 •1. 037DO JOSEPH SAVOY 19152 VIA DEL CADA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57193-0 17 03720 T. ASCHERIN t91B4 VIA 0 CABALLO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 34 - a, 2686 L,• ]1960-0 17 03850 N ARNETT. MD' -' - '.19141 LA PRADERA YORDA LINDA CA - 92686 �• 29398-0 17 03900 DEANNA MORALES 19131 LA PRADERA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 In 71ZFPRAOEIiA�'ORBR-L-INDAYA --�2686 44050-1 17 04050 RICK PIPKIN 19111 LA PRADERA YORDA LINDA CA 92686 L LI 31519-0 17 04100 E L MORTON 19100 LA PRADERA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 V 2596I-0____r7--7-U47SD'RAYMCND-A-. VIIaF----19IT0-VA-PRRDER0---MBAt-1NDA-CA 92686 AGE If 14:48:07 27 APR 14M .000LINTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . . .. . . SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY L STATE . .. . . . . ZIP ZOIrRAYMDRD-T1EWi91202TTflADERA-1'ORBA��TIDA'tA--'92686 ,3464-0 17 04300 HAROLD MCOEE 19140 LA PRADERA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 3840-0 17 04400 DONALD MARGHBURN 19172 LA PRADERA YDRDA LINDA CA 92666 R-mR R8 4515YTAEM-DR'--7.ORBA-L MA-CA�268 ,1404-0 17 04600 WILLIAM J FOX 19235 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 8939-0 17 04650 JEAN JOHNSTON 19211 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 IS B00TAN'BHEflMATr—Y91TI-ORZENTE YORBAtiINDA-CA ��—J 2686 69ffi-D -17 �: 049008ECKY ICNPTOWSKI 19151 ORIENTE'" YORBA LINDA CA ;.`. 92686 Z103-0 '17 - *05100 GEORGE MARRO 19136 ORIENTE DR YDRDA LINDA CA - 926%31 ' EANY-------19 �--132-ORIEMTEYORBA-LINDA- A �26B f4172-0 17 05200 JACK H. CHURCHNILL 19162 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 4006-0 17 05300 MIKE MANZAND 19182 ORIENTE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 RTI237U 11 -9540D-SALPH-ANDERSON 19222ii IENTE—�•ORBA-LYNOA-CA-----"'-9Z68 l8381-0 17 05600 HELEN A CR 9 4671 8 PALM E YORBA LINDA CA 92686 _ D0"KARENA�OONO-19191 SKYVIVE.-1'ORDA LIMA CA—r 926Bh 25687-0 17 05900 MICHA BROWN 19191 SKYVIEW KNOL YDRDA LINDA CA 92686 1 44478-0 17 05900 MICHAEL BECKNER 19171 BKWIEW 14NOL VORDA LINDA CA 92686 ,qzLl-1 17 6100-HAROLD20.ZR--T9141-SKYVIEW'KNOLt YORBA LINDA-CA— 9268b 17267-0 17 06130 HAROLD J. ENOEBRET80 19172 SKYVIEW KNOL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 27267-0 17 06150.OENNIS M NiLETBCHMEfl 19172 BNYVIEW YOROA LINDA CA 92686 2�KYVIEW KNOL-1'URBA LINDA CA 92686 47920-0 17 06350 MARRY W. JENSEN 19198 SKYVIEW KNOL YORBA LINDA CA 92696 1 17920-0 17 06350 MARK JAGWBIAK 19198 SKYVIEW KNOL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 SDOO F.T7-QAD�741TAI.H YORBA LINDA CA -92686--� J6044-0 17 • , 06600 B. M.'WINGER 2 4751 ,PALM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1 56044-0 . 17 06600 JOHN WIMSER - 4]51 .PALM -YOA LINDA CA 92686 ONTIIEYERB-477TALT�ORBRBA NDA-CA —9268 Y3 135-0 17 600 IRENE WALKER 477 LINDA ] 8 PALM YORBA LINDA CA 92686 18 0 317-0 17 6900 J K SCARBOROUCH 4779 PM YORBA LINDA CA 92606 - O-COOIE�RTTZ�7]3-PAIM]7YORBAY-[NDA-CA -92686-- 17116-0 [ 17 07100 M. R. WILDMAN . 4771 PALM - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 25703-0 17 : GROW JIM GRIME 19283 PALM VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 N9 00JAMES A STRAN.9�717T[A1tENICEZiA1'ORBAY'1NOq�R 926Btr i]931-0 ,..,,19 1130D JAMES A STRAND ' 5122 TORIDA WAY YORBA LINDA CA '" 92686 17014-0 19 L2400 ROBERT E SOULEA IN 3071.TDRIDA WAY YORDA L1NDA.c ` `. 92686 S - CUPART--------BOENA-VZST7—YORBA7CZNUA CA "'—"9268 19759-0 19 27B34 OCCUPANT JEFFERSON LOT 2 YORBA LINDA CA 92686 b 43741-0 19 27835 DAVE HILL 5562 JEFFERSON YDRDA LINDA CA 92686 3 - O 8A' C 2-- 19715-2 20 22300 DAVID LAWBON 5311 RICHFIELD RD VORBA LINDA CA 92686 L2535-0 20 22710 ROBERT NOBLE 5441 RICHFIELD RD YORBA LINDA CA 92686 f RO CHRIS H FLA 17743NE�'ORBA-CINDA�kT'�26H 44674-0 GO . r 23000 PEG TOMPKINS 17591. BUr.VISTA YORBA LINDA CA�"�',., � 92686 39235-0 21 100 FRANCES M GIBBON 5531 HIGHLAND VORSA LINDA CA 926861 1 r=NDA-M �26H .l = 14:48.09 27 APR IV90 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME ....... SERVICE ADDR . . . . . . . CITY 6 STATE ZIP T"—�500'RAYTARREOl7 7300-RItHF1EtD-flD--YORBA-I.YNOA-CA --926B6- 62311-0 21 10050 JACK ROSS 5039 EUREKA YORBA LIMA CA 92686 15595-0 -r 21 10110 JIM BENAVIDEZ HIGHLAND YORDA LIMA CA - 92686 21-: t0900-30MN'BENSON 391-M. VIVAID YDRBA-L-It�q-Cq— -0268 28162-1 21+' 115GO OCCUPANT 5501 HIGHLAND YORBA LIMA CA 92686 55909-0 21 12500 ROBERT JONES 5122 RICHVIELD RO YORBA LIMA CA 92686 909-T—..'1---'--12500 AYMOND-PgOI! ^"SM-RtCHFIELI) RD—VORBA-LINDA-CA 92686- 36235-0 21 12900 ROBERT L. CAFROL 5050jRICHPIELD ROA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 18346-0 21 1,2900 'DEWY JAOUES 17662 Y01BA LINDA I YORBA LINDA CA 92686 17662-YORBAY-INDA—%ORSA-L-IMA-CA 268 69441-0 21 14=5 OCCUPANT SDGI SIESTA LANE YORBA LIMA CA 92686 93T21 M500'ROBT—(. ANTXORNE ,�.9061-81EBTA-LANE—^-YORBA-L-INDA-tA - —92686- 65989-0 21 - 14600;OARY R MOLMES I ^`SOSI'81ESTA LANE "' YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56572-0 21 14700 VINCE.MORENO ' I; A.5111i61E6TALN.. ,, t�YORBA LINDA CA 92686 A -- ----AYA--9268 46496-0 21 14900 NAYNE L BLAIR 3131 SIESTA IN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 16987-0 21 15000 NM R MILLS JR D141 SIESTA LN YORDA LIMA CA 92686 5518-0 21 15200 DOUGLAS LAUERRT-5121'EUREKA-E%T—YORBA LINDA-CA -- 52933-0 21 ,' 15200 KENNETH MAPES. � - 5DS2.SUREKA a YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52933-U 21 15300 KENNETH MAPEB. JR� ' SOB2.61ESTA LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 0-'LORN SS--3062'SIESTA LN---YORBA-LIMA CA--9268 29815-0 21 15600 JOHELL a ONDON 5032 EUREKA LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 51922-0 21 156D0 JOHN F. CONDON, JR 5041 EUREKA YORBA LINOA CA 92686 —b3401-0 —21�900 ALERT 0. - 5241, S. HIGHLAND --�'ORBA-L-INDA CA ----92686-- 13401-0 21 16200 AWARD L. INGSTON 5211 -E. HIGHLAND - VDABA LINDA CA 92686' 13636-0 21 16200 HOWARD LIVIN08T0N - 5211 EUREKA YDRBA LINDA CA 92686' 00-W. V. iRuiz Rflll1—�5231 HIGHL'AND--YORBA LINDA CA 92686 40253-0 21 16600 W. V. RUII 5305 HIGHLAND AVE. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 4B253-0 21 16600 WALTER MCDONALD 8305 HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 l5877=0-----21 I7800,BARBARA :DLMINO�^27775 ACMFIELSA YORBA LINDA'CA, —'--92686--- 13741-0 21 17800 BARBARA OAKS %:17773 APPALOOSA YORBA LINDA`CA 92686 1374f-1 21 'y 17900 GREGORY FETTER 1 .: 'i 17773 APPALOOSA YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 W.N.M. OR-- 1T/BJYWPAI:GMA--YORBA-t7N0A'CA 9261i 24205-0 22 00200 KENNETH.'L„STICNTBR 18063 GLAIR DR " ` ..YDRBA LINDA -CA 92686 ^ 42955-0 22 00300 HALTER MAJER ?4 :� 062 BLAIR DR YORBA LIMA CA 92686 03MFORRESTTODINIP 32686 --� 49793-0 22 00315 GARY E FRYE 3211 S. HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 61744-0 22 00320 DORIS SHELLEY 5221 HICHLMO AVE YORBA LIMA CA 92686 -M539-0 22 T)0330-OAYCE-w-RATCMEN TOMCRND YOR8q'tSN,A-CA---------------92686 53339-1 ?2 00330 VINCE MA60N 3225 HIGHLAND ; 'YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 - r 29248-0 22, 00335.ROB KNAOCB ^"- 3222H10HLNi0 • 'YDRBA LINDA CA - 92686 52270-0 22�00335 40M H IESZL2'H1Di�1ND BA�[INOAYA -9268 12118-0 22 00360 ROBE T LI 5142 HIGHLAND YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 12I18-0 22 00360 ROBERT LINO 5142 HIGHLAND VOIBA LINDA CA 92686 32158 0--22�-0D365-RICHARD KEYIINAA08-3072 HIONLAND—�ORBA L'IMA'CA---- 92686 t 47293-0 22 00390 RICHARD KEYING ,.5043 HIGHLAND N YORBA LIMA CA 92686 f 47293-0 22 - Oo390 PAMw-- FINufrCTFLOP —ST S. HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 "209 - 71 M"9EW YORBA LIMA- CA --9268 36445-0 22 00400 ANDRE C C1Ale 5071 MT VIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686 SU 36NS-1 22 00400 ANDRE CIAIB 307/ MT VIEW YORDA LINDA CA _ 92686 VIC PAGE 13 14:413: 12 27 APR 1990 ,ACCOUIITS. . ROUTE READ SE0 NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDR . .. . . . . CITY 6 STATE ... . .. . ZIP 3WM--Z 22�041VFOBERT1iElR —3 B"TtiIEW-1'ORBAYYNDA-CA 92686- 21349-0 22 00413 CHARLES DANGLEIS - 10092 BLAIR DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 33247-0 22 00420 0 RICHARD ELLIOTT. 18042 BLAIR DR. YORSA LINDA CA 92686 �g>17�p 22�DD925-DAO-- -NEB ' *J —EOREKA YCRBAtIND� �92613 39053-0 22 00430 JUAN J FATTORI 18093 BLAIR DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 49150-0 22 00440 JOSEPH BURKE 16022 YORBA LINDA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �093Sp �2�0445�TER8 �80327YCRBA-LINDA- ORBAYINDA-CA 92686 69451-0 22 455 OCCUPANT HICHIAND YORDA LINDA CA 92686 19891-0 04700,9TEVE HYAMS LAKEVIEW :. YORBA LINDA CA 68 18100-0 22 05400 FRED W. KOEHNIKE 18291 SHOOK LANE YORBA LIMA CA ^ 92686 43765-0 22 05500 HALTER OOLDSBERRY 18271 SHOOK LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 27592-0 22 CECIL WM. CANN, .. 5381 DANIA PLAZA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 29542-0 22 - - 06100 RICHARD SAVAGE 5372 DANZA PLAZA YORBA LINDA CA 92686' -V ad ORBAY NDA-CI---------------Y26Bb 43681-0 22 06300 TOM BASNICK 18222 SHOOK LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 i 42490-0 22 06400 CHONG MANG 5351 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 74332-U-----—22 ORBA"CINDAYC — 92613 22780-0 22 06600 LOUIS ARNDT 5371 S. LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 22780-1 22 06600 CENTURY 21 ACHIEVERS 5371 S. LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92606 ky RBAT NDA-CA �26Bb 63773-0 22 06900 JAMES BELAND 18142 HUTCHINGS YORBA LINDA CA 92686 61849-0 22 07WO RONALD BRANGWYN 18123 HUTCHINGS DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �M 7300TONALO'RAEL 342TLAKEVrEW —1ORBA-tINDA-CA-92686 0 53089-0 22 07400 RICHARD A SAVAGE 5391 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 58231-0 22 07500 JAMES M PENCE..: 5441 LAKEVIEW AVE. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . IER DRBA CMM CA 92686 58864-0 22 07700 JOHN NEWMAN 5505 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 207L4-0 22 07730 WILLIAM W. MINTER 18191 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 12817-0 7735ZIICLZAM-E-VISREA�SIHi�UEtU1+i5TA--1'ORBA'tYNOAY'A--�2686 S 62848-0 22 07739 DAVID E PRUHS — 18175 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 . 30595-0 22 .07740 RONALD OIBONEY 18171 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 "4 EBER PET`TEY 18431 BUENA VISTA.--YORBA LIMA CA -'9268 210"-0 22 OB000 WALTER PETTEY 18365 BUENA VISTA. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 21064-0 22 OSI00 WALTER AUFDERHEID 18365 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 8200 HYRON-FICCER3'42BT11%E9TEHVORDA�'1NOAYA92b8 21715-0 22 ' OB300 LADD 0 MORRIS 18361 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 38866-0 22 08300 FRANK A RODRIGUEZ 18271 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 33 RRSON----- -BUENA-9IST ORBA-LINDA-CA 92619 33916-1 22 08600 DENNIS DUNBAR 18261 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 35893-0 22 08700 ALLISON SQUIRES 18251 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92666 47 SBDD-HENRY-RUDRIOUEZ-----TM49-BUENA�ISTA—YOROA-"M➢ A�2686 16300-0 . -22 - OB900 CHARLES CARMELO 1B211 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 13231-0 22 09WO WILLIAM VANCE 5542 LAKEVIEW YORSA LINDA CA 92686 35212-0 22 0,00 MRK-l)­CIXRK---------3S22ZTKE9IER YORBATINDA-CA 92696 17326-0 22 09200 HOWARD FACER 5502 LAKEVIEW YORSA LIMA CA 92686 LSO 3=66-0 22 09300 CANDICE WICKWIRE 5466 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 1 - 4400 JORFrMETTR—�4b-i�JhV1Ef> TORBA�-i4IDAZA926B -PAGE - 14 14:4B: 14 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDR ...... . CITY L STATE .. ..... ZIP �96W THOMANNA. COVR--3462'LAKEVIEN YORBA'LINDA CAS---92686 64417-0 22 - 09700 THOMA6 A. COVEY '. 3442�LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 64417-0 22 ( 09700 ALE% LE66IG;:� ' S492 lAKEVIEN ` YORBA LINDA CA 92686 L17-0 22T 09900'JACK HOLMWK1N9-- 0434 LAKEVIEW YORBA LIMA-CA —92686 44662-0 22 10000 JACK UGLAS 3452 LAKEVIEW YORDA LINDA CA 92686 44662-0 22 10000 V. DOUOLA6 MC GILL 9492 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 OM - 0400 ROONALD h D—.-�7422L-tAKEV1EW—YORBA 2606-- 2994 — 34261-0 22 - 104DO FRANCI M GRAHAM .5926 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ' 39261-0 � 22 �• -%lOSDOFRANC I9CO. NICVA rTM',:5372;LAREVIEW AYE. YORBA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 B-0 22' -1070D JOE J.PUOM'r'�-� 3352 LAAKEVIEW=liV!-=-YORBA-LINDA-CA 926E 50197-0 22 10000 CAR J. PUERTO 5342 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 9019]-O 22 10800 CARY 6AV08H 5342 LAKEVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686 28-1 -22--11000 OFRAN `^6320 AREVIETr—YORBA-LINDA CA '--92686 24484-1 22 11000 OFRAN SH[PMAN y ,:3314 LAKEVIEW VORBA LIMA CA 92686 24489-0 - 22 °11002�LYNN.UALA9ZEK (i , Cy 5314 LAKEVIEW ' (� '.,•;(YORBALINDA CA .1 T'v l' 92686' 264 TIKI TORCHLAYORBA-LINDA 22 11300 ELLEN J BI890NETTE, 5244 TIKI TORCH LA YORBA LINDA CA .� 92686 63064-D 22 1/900 FREO PpCINELL/ 5294 TIKI TORCH YORBA LINDA CA 92686 A - 00 MANYYAM UENTES08--5202-7YKY TORCH-LA YCABA LIM CA -92686 $5558-0 22 11700 JAMES BREENTES. 5201 TIKI TORCH LA 1', :YORBA LINDA CA. 92686 55958-0 . 22 11]OO-JAMEB GREEN 5254-rtttt TORCH LN;r;YCRBq LINDA CA B � • 92686 TLFAR'-5232' LAKEVIERCNtN-"YORBArtINDA-CA�- 9268 21547-0 22 11910 RHDNDA FOX 5232 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 21947-1 22 11910 ANTHONY TOSONI 5232 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 bT�22 '/2000-R]CNARO"MgCIB:PN-tlN-:J222TANEVI ENyORBAYYNDA y.'A. --926D6------ 37957-0 22 12100 RUBY MAISE , 5232 S. LAKEVIEW YORD4 LINDA CA " 92686 ., 60469-0 22 . 12200 SERGIO DAY LA. ' 9202 LAREVIEW YORDA LINDA CA 92686• 575H3-O dd T2300 LZ7I"1111RTA-U VI I 5192-rAKEVIt DRBA-LINDA-Cp —�2696 22324-0 22 12500 UJAOAR 8 UV 5184 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57871-0 22 12600 VINCENT J ROHALY 5172 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -Z•3IZ8� 22—�2619THDMAS-I"ATES—Y8452 HADY-KNOLL---YDRBA'L1NDA-CA----92686- 62344-0 - 22 12620 JOHN MILLER ?.` ' 18472:SHADY KNOLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 26200-0 ..22 12623 JAMES CUNNINONAM -. 10461 SHADY KNBLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -26200=I-32�Td6297tARO7E"CONREITE—te4b1'3NADY'KNDCL-1'OROAYYNDA�:A - 9261 26200-2 22 12629 JAMEB CUNNINGHAM IB461 SHADY KNOLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 14047-0 22 12630 HAROLD M FOULER 18451 SHADY KNOLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -74I93��22-^-"�'�T2700-pCENNZigRN00 2'-tAKEV1EH---YORBA-LiNOA-CA�T-926B S9t47-0 1 22 AY ' ;.12800 MARR R BILL,I n rl1D :S 42 LAI{EVIEN VORBA LINDA CA y'.Y�i } 92686 " .. ..r Blfi i 37159-0 23 00277 DR JOHN SC14MIDT 510Y SUMMIT DR YORDA LINDA CA 92686 -l9SSl--03 -�0300'LLVYDTANpR1r-1B8627'ORBgT1NDA—YORBAYYNOAYp-----9265 17269-0 23', 00700,ANTONIO ZARAGOZA ,:'{�IB911 CAMINO VERGE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 55795-0 23 00800 DANIEL J WILLIAMS ."IBB9I CAMINO VERDE YORDA LINDA CA 92686 269 fr 17578-0 23 01000 JAMEB P. GUARDIA 18851 CAMINO VERDE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 45307-0 23 01050 MARSH L HOVIVIAN 10841 CAMINO VERDE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 -023OiIHO-ALV719-A OACH—�HB92-@MINO'VERDE--YORBA-L'INDAY.A�2686 31477-0 23 ° 01200 R A OBERJUERGE ' 10047 VIA SERENO YORBA LINDA CA 92686' 52237-0 23 01400 ROBERT J SCHLOSSER 18972 CAMINO VERDE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �LIHL=1�"23 606 35749-0 23 01600 RAYMOND METZGER 5151 $0. OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92606 2 47713-0 23 01700 RICHARD E.HEYING 18931 VIA SERENO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 29S7I=0 23-"�ISDO-WAlTB-VCHAAC '1B902 TAMTN3I+EROE—YORBA' -INDA-CA— — 92686 . PAGE 15 14:48: 16 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME .. .... . SERVICE ADOR . . . . . .. CITY 6 STATE . . . . ... ZIP TEDS5�23�T90O-BOYDTCBANIEC'�E9TIVTATiEAENO-1'ORBA-CINOA-C —'268 48439-0 23 02WO RICHARD H HARMB 1BB71 VIA SEREND VORBA LINDA CA 92686 60445-0 23 - 02200 LAWRENCE J TEMBERCER 1BS41 VIA SERENO YORDA LINDA CA 92686 .':P•l1 � MOO BELAERTl1:S1HEECOCR 16860'VIA'SEREND YORBA-LINDA CA— 9268 44753-0 23 02400 BELL BIRLBAE 1B860 VIA SERENO YORDA LINDA CA 92686 44733-0 23 02300 PAUL L HUNTER 1BBB0 VIA SERENO YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 Ilabb-. AW KOHITZER 4' 18932'VIA'SERENO—YORBA-L-IMA-CA --9268 23221-0 23102600 F W KONITZER ai4"` ' 18932 VIA 9EREN0 VORBA LIMA CA 92686 45037-0 -23 ' 1 - 02700 J. C. ROWETT- _ 9241.OHIO BT. YDRBA LINDA CA . 92686 46YD4-u di D�ORN-VECAZOOE7-72ITS9HID YORBAYINDA-CA —9268 53527-0 23 03400 FRANK LETTANO 5335 OHIO ST. YDRBA LINDA CA 926B6 38713-0 23 03500 RICHARD LICANO 18902 VIA ENCANTO YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 5743 6U0-BROCE-FARRAR Z8B921IA-ENCANTO--YORBA-LINDA-CA- —'---92686 25696-0 r 23 037M GORDON.HEHAFFY 18891 VIA ENCANTO YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 1;n. 11 25696-I -23 - '03700 RONALD W STAVERT. 1y.18891 VIA ENCANTO- -YDRBA LINDA CA 92686,'. a77JW-0 23 BOO�IOOOFORO'CR01�-1Tf9fI'91A-ENCANTO—YDRBA-l'INDA-SA -'12686 :=— 3YS26-0 23 04000 FOSTER SMITH 5401 S. OHIO YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 39826-1 23 04WO THUMB C TEKALVE 5401 S. CHID YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 4100-RDNAM-OAAONER--5372-MTVIE{ ORBA-�t1NDA-CA 92686 17143-0 23 . 04200 STEVEN HOBSON - 5350 MT VIEW YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 i� 1 21013-0 . 23 04310 FRED SMITH . 5320•MT VIEW YDRBA LINDA CA . 92686 • q`._4. VZO0"liT-VIER ORBA-MNDR�A 26I BBBBBC 37333-0 23 04400 KENNETH BARTON 3320 DOUOLAS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 [!, 39373-0 23 04500 ALLEN C MILLER 5330 DOUGLAS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 �} 35020=I------ OROAYINDA-CA ----92686 , ---- F 29819-1 .23 04700 RICHARD PROSSER 3362.LINDFORD LANE YDRBA LINDA CA - 92686 28330-0 23' - - 04800 LED STUDER 5374 DOUGLAS LN YONBA LINDA CA _ .. 92686 EJ 900-R.—C. A /260 65470-0 23 04950 CARLOS 0. AGUIRRE 3345 DOUGLAS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 30328-0 23 05000 C H ANDERSON 5350 DOUGLAS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 3 - f00-ERNESTLCHOTORENA R-333I-DOUGCA9W---YORBA "WDA-CA /2686 1TI25-0 23 '1 05200 REGINA JENSEN 5323 DOUGLAS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 33IB1-O 23 03210 RONALD D. SMITH - 5296 NORCRIS LANE YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 1. 126E 37015-0 23 05214 PAUL RIEKER 5266 NORCRIS LN YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 13774-0 23 05216 JAMES DIETZ 5246 NORCRIS LN YORDA LINDA CA 92686 3779 lW-r CENT-1JEEHE1TlID-5226TIORCHISLWi ., RBA-CINOA-CA —9268 L�H 65302-0 23 -05220 FREDERICK HUTCHISON 5221 ;NORCR/8 LANE, _ YORBALINDA-CA 92686 12109-0 23 :. , •. ,05222 ALBERT SANCHEZ 5241 NDRCRIS LANE YORDA LINDA CA . : 92686 M1S =627-023 0522W-MVCES-R-T A RTCl 261-RORCRTS-tN -YDRBA MA-00 9268 �. 24200-0 23 0523D JANICE TEDFORD 5230 TEDFORD WAY YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 46234-0 23, 05300 BARBARA MC CREDIE 5221 TEDFORD WAY YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 "UM ESO CCEN-DCANKENSHTP-5225-TEOFDRD-9A ORBWI:INDA-CA--�2686 24718-0 23 �'05400 ROBERT CUMMINGS 5231 TEDFORD WAY - YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 26659-0 23 `- \ 05500 RONALD K MU"ER --5216 TEDFORD.WAY -. _.YORBA LINDA CA "' 92686- 55459_-2� —65b-OD�I7CRAEC�{IIECDS 524I�EOFOItO'ZiR��ORBA-L710)AZ1� 92686 1 r 12918-0 23 03650 DONALD E JOHNSON 3279 TEDFORD WAY YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 14338-0 23 05700 LEONARD ALVISO 5275 TEDFORD WAY YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 l '- 9B00-RO6ETUGL2EClIANA-32BZ'IfrOIEfT YDRBA-LINDA-CA-- 92643 109SI-0 23 03900 VICTOR DE Wm 3162 MT VIEW ' YDRBA LINDA CA - 92696 1307E-0 23 " 06100'J. N. CAVE 5302 MT.. VIEW VORBA LINDA CA 92686 5 - C-BONOWrT2-----.1429T"T.OS-AL:MB RBA-LIMA-IM —9268 19471-0 23 06600 MICHAEL MONCRIEF 5201 LOB ALTOS YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 t1359-0 23 06700 40SEPH JORDAN 5211 LOB ALTOS VORBA LINDA CA 92686 r2 i -------3f4T-tOB-AtTOST-------YURl3 INDA CA 92660 - 14:40: 18 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDR .. . .. . . CITY 6 STATE ZIP 297=U-------23- u69o0-DENMS ICIC 519Tt05"ALTOB�ORDA- NDA-CA '92686 25303-0 23 07000 CARRIE SMELTZER 5116 LOS ALTOS . YORBA LINDA CA 92686 37307-0 .23 07100 DAN A CADDIS -3146 LOS ALTOS } ',. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 T7 ' 8-AtTOB—'y'ORBArttNDA-CA 9268 40975-0 23� 07300 TODD LEVERICH 5182 LOS ALTOS YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56623-0 23 07400 HENRY H MUIR 5194 LOS ALTOS YORBA LINDA CA 92666 52-��3-�]500"Yt]CHAET=OELIICA—�206-L09'AtTOB , YORBA-LYNOA - --- 2696 2BOB4-0 23 07530 ➢AVID WITTEN 5262 LOS ALTOS YORBA LINDA CA 92686 33 - 319""IEN 1'ORBA-t-INDA-CA- 92686 52012-0 23 07700 M. J. REED 5192 MOUNTAIN VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57619-0 23 07800 MARK SANDOVAL 5422 MT VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 89=0--23 0BOOO NANCYbCSEN.- 5380-8-0HS0'BTREB-YOR BA-L-tNDA-CA - -92686- 47884-0 23. 08100 L W FICKLER: 5392 OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 19343-0 23 08300 'C ARL J. ,EHLERT „ .5362 OHIO.T YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 232-8--ONT0'81. YDROA -.1- CA 926B 12743-0 23 08900 GERTRUDE DANKER 5132 B. OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52786-0 23 O6915 R. D. SCHURR $122 S. OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 5"-`U--23-0WOG71ANUEC7VERA ;, J552-,ll IEW VORBA--LINDA-CA ---- 92686 33]43-0 - 23 ° 10100 ALLAN WALLACE 19071 COUNTRY CLUBYORBA LINDA CA 92686 28858-0 23 - 10400 CHARLES E:MEEMAN 5402 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 H998YIONTEC1TObR--'Y0118A�-tNOA-M �7268 22669-0 23 11900 JAMES 0 BRIDGES 18940 VISTA REAL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56563-0 23 12700 DWIGHT 0 TRIPLETT 18921 VISTA REAL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 OOTOLDWEL1=BANKER--1B92Y lI -RBAL--YORBA-L-INDA�A—' 92686 — 46756-0 23 - 13000 CAROLE SMITH 5122 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 54514-0 23 13400 JOHN A. SKDGMAN 5052 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 92686 36433-0 23 13500 JACK HARRIS 18721 WINDY KNOLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 55144-0 23 13600 DEMOINE MCCARTY 10711 WINDY KNOLL YORBA LINDA CA 92686 --2938 - STERYJ:�OORNTER�J243-DRANDVIEW—YORBA-L-INOA-CA -�2686 41386-0 23 14550 BANGOR-KOVACS} 18961'GORDON LANE-. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 36118-0 - 23 15400 PETER.DAY " -5321 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �4i9 RANDVIEW�ORDA-LINDA-tW — 2686 33623-0 23 15350 RICHARD FORDE 5333 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56479-0 23 15600 DANIEL AUTOVINO 5369 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92606 -247iS=0�71OOTRAN DEC-OIOROIO-5371-CRANDVIEW '-YORBA-"NDA-CA -92686 62203-0 23 15900 DONALD W ASTA I ^, 5373 GRANDVIEW .L YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - 38767-0 23 16000 JEANNE,GRA00 - 5375 GRANDVIEW !'! '.' YORBA LINDA CA ` 92686 -72B73=0----23—"MO0-TRCiPE1-SCNCZNOER 87I-COUNTRY'CCOB-YORBA-LTNDA-CA 9268 40004-0 23 16340 PAUL N KINAR 5462 MT VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 16636-0 24\ 20050 H 6 T MAHOTKA 5162 FAIRWAY VIEW VORBA LINDA CA 92686 1-0 25 20000 BRUCE BURMASTER 17732 BUENA VISTA' YORBA LINDA CA 92686 0 8-BOVNA-VIST ORBAYYNOAtA 92696 ' 20092-0 23 20900 EDWARD DANIEL 17774 BUENA VISTA VORBA LINDA CA 92686 ' 3302E-0 25 -21WO ARNOLD MONREAL 17772 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 LI�j PAGE -17 14:48:20 27 APR 19% ACCDVNTB. . ROUTE READ BED NAME . . . . . .. SERVICE ADDR . . .. . . . CITY 6 STATE . . . . . .. ZIP RN-KAAOUES--556T HLTND------YORBA- :INDA-CA —92686 54481-0 "26 - 00200-HAL N HIBBARD 5671 HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 56464-0 26: 00300 DUFF WERTZ 5681 HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA " 92686 - _ � f•' -;H.' 720�I.YLFFTiEpERItItBON—tTBbt-ANNA'?IgATERO—'IORBA"tINDAYA �)26B 49270-0 26 00710 LARRY BAKER 170" ANNA MARIE RD YORBA LIMA CA 92666 14164-0 26 01000 ORRIN R. SHATTUCK ANNA MARIE RD YORBA LINDA CA 92686 wo IIOC-SHAG AFL— 73YNIVHtMND--YORDA-LINDA-CA —9269 66949-0 26 " .01200 JAMES COLLINS :"5741 HIGHLAND AVE. ., YORBA LIMA CA , 92686 . S .1��". t+-d•.�;z.. < 30079-0 -21 01300 MICHAEL STYER ,j;3771 .HIGHLAND .ay YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ANK-5795-R=KCAND--�YORBA-LYNDA-CA—�26B6 47296-1 26 01500 MIKE ELLIOTT 5811 HIGHLAND 'YORBA LINDA CA 92686 32455-0 26 01600 STANLEY P SHIELDS 5799 HIGHLAND VORBA LINDA CA 92686 730-OCEN-HAROWICK17932 A-RANCHERO- %ORBA- INDA-CA —' 92606-T NBB3-O '26 - ; • :-01733 OLEN"HARDWICK' 17952 VIA RANCHERO 'YORBA LIMA CA ( - 92686 : F h•i ( } `;183]6-/ ." 26. `_ .':01733 LISA VAN OINI{El..i - 17962'V 1A,RANCMERO MBA LI NOA.CA . •92686 . UORRI 92686 - - I3B28-0 - 26 01745 J THEODORE BALLARD 17982 VIA RANCHERO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 46270-0 26 01800 JIM MATYCH 5013 HIGHLAND AVE VORBA LINDA CA 92686 �01928 BARTLEY ORENZER--'- 6019 NUTMEG P09q— YUBA LIMA-CA� 9268 13711-0 26 -01950 CHRIS T MULL 6099 NUTMEG YORBA LINDA CA 92686 "9 "'•±• " 35950-0 26 01950 CHfl 18 TRECHTEA 6082 HIGHLAND 'YORRA LINDA CA 92686 s BECK 6062 HIGHLAND— VORBA LINDA-CA 9268 63400-0 26 02100 MARTIN NDYT 6D12 HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 20605-0 26 02100 CHARLES O STUENE 6012 HIGHLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 —60753-0 26 02300'JOSEPH ACOB6ENN5922 5 HIGHLAND YORBA'LINDA CA -92686---- i0753-0 26 02300 JOSEPH.N HOLDREN 5792 6 HIGHLAND VORBA LINDA CA 92686 N9 —36D33=0--27-----VD300-JOECAIRSCHER—_ --lB1B2-BVENAI+ISTA--'DRBAYYNDK CA— '-9269tr 14482-0 27 00400 ARTHUR DIETRICH 10202 BUENA VISTA YORBA LIMA CA 92686 f.: - 31783-0 27 00600 R 8 MCDONALD 5641 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 D-RAYE- SBBT-CAKEOIERYORBA-LYNDAtA -92686 47647-0 27 DOWD MARY VAN SCHAIK 5883 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 i 25276-0 27 01050 ROBERT VENTURA 5B85 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 —12799- ATNr-JOHNSON 595TLAKEVIE —' ORBA-LINDA-CA----92686 24793-0 27 01200 KATHLEEN SAVANT ' - 5893 LAKEVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686. ' '•� 58711-0 27 01400 WILLIAM P.SWIFT 5981 S. LAKEVIEW YORBA LIMA CA .92686 ROCE-RILEV---------5971-BZAKEVIEH—YDRBA-t7M CA 92611 42571-0 27 01799 RELIANCE PLASTERING 1BIB2 ORCHARD DR YUBA LIMA CA 92686 56332-0 27 02050 DONALD MCCORMICK 6050 LAKEVIEW YUBA LIMA CA 92686 36 -I w... D20 CAR50- OC-DANDULDS 6050-CAKEVIEW--YOflBA- MA-GA —�2606 , 60673-0 27 021M GREG METRANGA 6032 LAKEVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 39106-0 . 27 02200 GALLEY All HAYNES --1.6006 LAKEVIEW . -YORBA LINDA CA .:92686 p -O `\.... DA-t7 686 20065-0 27 02250 RDBENT A SITTER 1B242 TIMBERLANE YORBA LIMA CA 92686 37402-0 27 02300 LILLIAN HEATING 18252 TIMBERLANE VORBA LIMA CA 92686 62835­0 0240D-CRARLEUL;ESSEN—'�1D262TIMBERLTNE-D�YORBA'tYNDA-CA— 92696 :M : 31042-0 27 02425 JOSEPH LRMPHEAR : 18272 TIMBERLANE :YORBA LINDA CA - ` '92686 ]]038-0 2/ 02450 VELORZS ROBISON 18282 TIMBERLANE YUBA LINDA CA 92686 i y �• I 4 + FFIB292TIMBERCARE—YORBATINDAZA --92686 61286-0 27 02500 JOHN DYAS 18312 TIMBERLANE YORBA LIMA CA 92686 1 37057-0 27 02600 FRANK BAILOR 18332 TIMBERLANE YORBA LINDA CA 92686 3a 27DD�WiE971?TAASiWL7-18333.1TMBIFCIBJ�YOIIBATI B PAGE 16 14:48:22 27 APR 1990 • ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE BEAD BEG NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDS . . . . .. . CITY i STATE .. . . . .. ZIP ASLE-PMVATEER—IH33I-➢OS-CASA-DR. — MDA-'1NDA-CA --92686 39016-D 02900 DONALD'H-ADAMS 18321'.DOS CASA DR. YORBA LIMA CA ' 92666 r 15793-0 .'27iF- :'03000.ROBERT,K BpSLEY 18291.TIMBERLANE D YORBA LINDA CA 92686 IO ERCANC-D—YORHA-tiIIDA-CA — 9268 21151-1 27 03100 VAN ENDRESEN - 10322 TIMBERLANE D YORBA LINDA CA 92686 t • 21151-2 27 031DO BREN➢A LOVIN 18322 TIMBERLANE D YDRBA LIMA CA 92686 . . . ... D ^'IBM 3-TIMBERtAN�VORBA-L-INDA-CA' �2686 . T30 RAYNAEL'MALM➢ER - 61132-0 27:. ¢' +'03130 PAY Ny AELA70RE8 'd8310,TIMSERLANE {q' YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 . f� r 63231-0 „03140 WAYHE tii-GRIFFIN •', 18314:;TIMSERLANE y.w;., YDRBA LINDA* CA a 92686 r u;. O'FAANC2H CASTTTIA�28281 TIMBERLANE YORBA-L INDA-CA�-9268 21457-0 - 27 03200 STEPHEN CABTRD IB271 TIMBERLANE YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 t 21457-0 27 03300 RTEPXEN F-MNWRO 18271 TIMBERLANE YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 r 99B IH2SY?IMBERt NE-DTVORBA-LINDA-CA'-- —9268 - 32065-0 27.,.1^e' ;03500°.N14L SEM!@Mtw6t1 . ;y 1822f.TIMBER LN ^u .YDRBA LINDA CA iP�1.3 3 . 92686;'' iy � �. rrt 1 •t i� �. . A 57331-0 h� 27:'a', Fn :0360081IIOEMI SRBIANRIIA15B425LAKEVIE11 � tYDgBA I;IIDIA.:CA nyy 92686 '. a. y .J.14... ;.. .•..i BIT-O-28 00200-BROCE-MAXNBM ,75253 MT VIEW09-- YORBA-L�INDA-CA— 9268 12805-0 2B 00400 JOHN ND J N ',0251 MT VIEW YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 34798-0 2B 00400 RAYMOND J NIXONIZO " ` - 5251 MT VIEW YDRBA iINOA CA 92686 B�0600 RICLYAM-BRAT��J2 5 MT.VIEW--YORBA LIMA CAS-92686 5714 B-0 20 00625 KLAUS p C ATK[N8 5271 MT. ETEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57148-0 28 00625 KLAU9 WENDEL 5271 SUNSET YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 00700-JAMES MAREECD1 530D SUNSET----YORBA-LINDA-CA�-92686- 46972-0 '.. 28 00900 WILLI MOCK 111 ' '`. r., 5282 SUNSET YORBA LIMA CA _ - 92686 49030-0 '�� -.38- + OOBOO NILLIAM.PgYNE `. 5282 SUNSET .YDRBA LIMA CA - �' "' 92686 D-ORRY'M-BORROR'—5371 MT VIEW YORHA'CSNDA-CA--9268 12709-0 28 01100 JL RIE E. 5373 MT VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 12709-0 28 01300 CEORGE E. LUDWIO 5373 MT. VIEW YDRBA LIMA CA 92686 ZM1TARCEB-MCKEE'-7411 MT,VIEW YORBA-LINDA-CA---92686-- 21562-0 - 28 01200 JOHN H SAUFA {1 :.F!9411 MT,VIEW YDRBA LIMA CA 92686 26680-0 . 28 - 013M JACK GRIFFIN 5472'.CHERRYLEE" .. YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 NIb4IIi'Cl4RRYtEE-tl��'ORBA-tINDA-Cg726B 60646-0 28 01500 SIDNEY H WILLIAMS 5471 CHERRYLEE LN VORBA LIMA CA 92686 29299-0 28 01600 FRANK 8 DAMS 5442 CHERRYLEE LN YORBA LINDA CA 92686 6..... 22'cmSARYLEE-LYY —YDRBA-I'INOA-CR --92686 ,. 40D72-0 • '28 OIBOO.CHARLES BLACKWOOD ' -5421'MT,VIEW -VORBA LIMA CA . 92686 ' 24997-0 28 y . ': 01900 RONALD L PETERMAN - 3301;TAMMARISK VORBA LIMA CA 92686 - —Z499T-1OI900ZHOMA 1'DIARTSK"-'--YOIIBA = DA-CR-9268 33410-0 2B 02WO SALLY MORROW 5521 TAMMARISK DR YORBA LIMA CA 92686 43771-0 28 02100 WILLIAM E MCCLELLAND 5531 TAMMARISK YDRBA LINDA CA 92686 " 240B2�78�wl—02300 RONALDCLAVER 5361 TAMMAR ISKORI—VORBA-LINDA-CA—�-92686 24082 0 28 + A 02400 DIETED LAVEgTV r e10561 TAMMAI116K OR . YORBA LIMA'CA 92686 39385-0 - 28 1.g b2400DIEfER�KROENLEIN Bi 4 5571 FIR CREST DR ': VORDA.LIMA CA 92686 ECLZiDOp—�JS]S"FT1t=CREST'DR--1'ORBA-t-ZNDA-CA��1268 43366-0 20 02600 PATRICK WHELAN D577 FIR CREST YORBA LIMA CA 92686 52108-0 28 02700 JOHN SCHERMERHDRN 5579 FIR CREST YDRBA LIMA CA 92686 —52462-0 20 02900 R. D. 'CHOLLER--5583 FIR--CREST'DR—'YORBA LINDA-CA-- '92686- 33659-0 - 28 02900 R. H. 'CHALLAWELL "`5584 FIR CREST YDRBA LIMA CA - 92686 - 35659-0 2B - 03000 H. L. L C NI'un t 5584 PEBBLE BEACH YORBA RA LINDA CA 92686 TiRIT�7552-PEBBLE'BEACH YDRBA LIMA-CA 9268 , 16402-0 28 03300 GREGORY BAKER 5532 PEBBLE BEACH YORBA LIMA CA 92686 U725-O 2D 03300 JOSEPH NECKER 5532 PEBBLE BEACH YDRBA LIMA CA 92686 M J - 3 BIFBEMN—'YORDAZYNOA-Gq�—�2 PAD6- IS 14:4H: 16 27 APR 1990 PACE 19 14:48:23 27 APR 1990 ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME . . .. . .. SERVICE ADDS . . . . . . . CITY 6 STATE . . . . . .. ZIP OR9A�Y DA-CA �26H6 33939-0 2B -036DO MARK-VINCENT, - 3461 MT VIEW YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 - 35920-0 YF28 -T { OJ700 N PATEL .]921 PEBBLE BEACH . YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 S' p3BOp'RAVMON31-EETils—^J]3YPEHOtE�EACH—YORBgt'INOfrCk92b8 16321-0 23 03900 OLE" A DAVIDSON 5531 PEBBLE BEACH VORBA LINDA CA 92686 49939-0 28 04WO ROBERT 0 HILL 3561 PEBBLE BEACH VORBA LINDA CA 92686 EATS-'NOARON J562'T-MMARISK-OR---YORBA--171 -0 NDA-C ---- 2686 26950-0 y L''4B % 04200 JAMEB HOWE }V -,'SSS2. TAMMARIBK ;VORBA LINDA CA 92686 T 269417 .ZB } f i'?' 04300 A. i532 TAMMARISK YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 i40D'PA0C�iALEB ` 3522TAMMAR19K YORBArt �1 2NDA-CA 2686-- 62779-0 28 04500 CLARENCE O FARQUHAR 5441 MT VIEW VORBA LINDA CA 92686 11326-0 28 04600 DENNIS SCHWIETERMAN 5501 GRANDVIEW YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 D - 3700-PATRTC"T—YNH--]52T-GRANDYTEW-------YORBAti A-CA --�2686-- 48407-0 29 - 04800 MARGARET"-A RAYBURN'-,,.5531-GRANDVIEW YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 ' =-13397-0 -.28: 1 - �,04900 ANTE MAROVIC� pa: 5551 CRANDVIEW AYE... YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 •' �• O-OOTREY-MRTEA�-5'JT1--DVIEm VORBA-LTNDA-CA� 86 62268-0 28 05100 DENNIS HOW 5501 GRANDVIEW VORBA LINDA CA 92686 10894-0 28 05200 WILLIAM FELOEMAKER 5601 GRANDVIEW YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 9798-O 2 �05300-.OADE-BUCCAA�B70t'BUENA-VI-91 --YCIRBA-LINOA-CA �2606 46582-0 2B .. 05304 GERALD VERPOOTEN 10691 BUENA VISTA ' YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 65062-0 28 053W FOREFRONT DEV : 18571 BUENA VISTA YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 --YORBAY NDA- A�268 65245-0 28 05450 HENRY RIVERA 18551 BUENA VISTA YGRBA LINDA CA 9268b 23350-0 28 05500 RUBY SANOERFER 18491 BUENA VISTA YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 9—�SSOOTIRB'JOLTAZORBIT'—tB46T'BUENA'VISTA—YGRBA-L�NDA-CA— �2be6.--- . 54010-0 26 03700 ALVIN P,FOSS '.•` 10451 BUENA VISTA VORBA LINDA CA 92686 14710-0 29 05842 AR1E DINDENANS', - 5470 ROBIN CIRCLE YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 611wO-0 go 90p-DS tu32TVISTA-DEL ---YORn- INDAYA 2686 57925-0 28 06000 ORLIN JACKSON 18372 VISTA DEL LA VORBA LINDA CA 92686 16336-0 28 06100 WILLIAM B WALLS 18392 VISTA DEL LACO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 —3227"-------28 DS40D-FAEO-CARPENTEIC—MOM-VIBT EL-.'A---YORBA-LYNOA-CA— 92686- 57533-0 28 ",V 06500 JAMEB MOWARD�w{ttMM 18331 VISTA DEL LUDO VORBA LINDA CA - 92686 " " f^ "18452 BUENA VISTA,.....,,VORBA LINDA CA:.._ 92686 22663-0 28' j 06600 CHRZS,JORDAN qy;fy' 43�78-0-- IT.TDii"R7m4A'CB--�ISSSSZ09K-0Of�ORBAI:t 25174-0 EE 06734 PAUL LA PLANTS 18550 LOOK OUT DR VDRBA LINDA CA 92686 41986-0 ME 06734 HARRY A TOD LOOK OUT DR - YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 S90DZMllLESIfICW1ECE _ 781-0=--- �.VOHBA-"NDA-CA� 268 48S05-O .. �•2B �� 07000 REOIS DONNELLY ^' 5801 OHID ` ^ ' YDABA LINDA CA 92686 5NI71 2B": - `- 07100 PATRICIA V EILIOTT. % 5821 OHIO. YGRDA LINDA CA 92686 30 RICHARU omm' JEST-DRIQ YDRSA-t-=A-tA�6H6 47068-0 28' 07800 MICHAEL OLOVAK 5841 LAKEHAVEN YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 52564-0 28 079GO B C DEWEESE JA 5011 LAKESHORE LN YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 �9T29 --28HW0-CSCAND-7iAN8pN—D819TNtE5R0ilETN—YORBA'tTNOA-C'A -�26Bb --- ^^ 31171-1 28 08100 STEPHEN COPENMAVEN 5831 LAKESHORE DR YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 ' 12829-0 20 08200 GEORGE W OJA 5931, SANDRA DR :: YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 ��.. 11539 OMB D93DH ova, EnNuRA-UH--YO101ATTMA TA 92696 26761-0 28 O8400 GERALD L ROBERTSON 5971 SANDRA DR YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 28733-0 28 OB500 CLOVIS CLINE 5972 SANDRA DR. YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 —28779=1—�8 . 08SOOZRONTitTpIX-", 9]27SANDRA-OR.�YOABAZZNDA-L 686 _ 10777-0 20 00600 JOHN KOELLEN 5962 SANDRA OR YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 62581-0 28 - 08700 STEPHEN J CLARK 5832 SANDRA DR. VORBA LINDA CA 92686 3—Td9S 0 R�OB00tf"ALVINli00ISOR-7B97-NIO" �ORBAZTNOAZA — Y2696 43162-0 28 08900 J L CRINER $901 OHIO YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 43855-0 2B 09200 KENT MCKEE 6001 OHIO ST YGRBA LINDA CA 92686 5� 27346-0 GO 0ZZTfSTW1-TETERCE--TB= ARCYIAY—�BAZ DAZA�268 1.11 du 14:4B:27 27 APR IV90 /ACCOUNTS. . ROUTE READ BEG NAME ....... SERVICE ADDR ....... CITY 6 STATE ....... ZIP' 8 V9600ZHOM11 C92 D IC YORBA-tYNDA-CA- ^92686 63403-0 28 09700 CWENDOLYN PRANCEVIC 60S2 S. OHIO VORBA LINDA CA 92686 $2190-0 28 09800 JAMES FORBYIH . ' 6072 OHIO - 1" YORBA,LINDA CA 92686 �,x. • B' OtOD-F'PITIlVUr ]2"OMtO "RBA-t-1NDA=Ck `926Bb. . 43876-0 281' 10300 LUIZ RAMIREZ. 3922 B. OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 40123-0 28 10430 BOB FUTTERER 5841 SHORT ST YORBA LINDA CA 92686 28069-0 28 '10700 LARKINj MULKEY _' .'4.5S37 6 OHIO s ' VORBA LIKOA,CA s926B6'-•' - >P 60061-0 28' ♦.Yy 110B00 OONALD' TADLOCK �,�..'X D822 0HI0 8T - `"YORBA LINDA;CA •:/6 �192686"s ix 1 „kI� 00'. --WARNER- 3-2'OMi9-9T- 90RBA-LINDA-CA- �R68 38]BO-O 2B IID00 ROBERT PETERSON 5782 OHIO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 5013B4-0 28 11100 GEORGE P MENDOZA 10652 BUENA VISTA VORBA LINDA CA 92686 92696— 21301-0 28 "11300 ALBERT AGUILAR , 1H666 BUENA VISTA" I: .YORBA LINDA CA 92686 36832-0 ` 28 ;11400 NANCY DRAKE ` ' 18672 BUENA'VISTA >!_'YORBA LMA CA `' �92686 00-CIW MPHERTA04A"`]8672-B �YMBA-t1NDA-CA -92bB 38407-0 28 115M TERRY L JAMES 18602 BUENA VISTA YORBA LINDA CA 92686 13504-0 28 1160D MICHAEL SINCLAIR 18692 BUENA VISTA YORBA LIMA CA 92686 B764=0--�B--------17700TDA'IiERHERT----5531"OH10BY YORBA'L-1NDA-Cp 9R686— 16445-0 211 '11715 STEVE RIVKIND 5541 8 CHIO ° " YORBA LINDA CA 92686• ' 54823-0 28 12100 J.V. TAYLOR ° 5653 GRANDVIEW <'VWBA LIMA CA '92686 t B--I2300'DONALDOREETt--'5673'GRANDVIEW YORBA-LINDA CA- 9268 33796-0 2B 1240D DONNED REED 5673 GRANDVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686 33]96-0 2B 1240D GLEN WARNER 5683 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 57�38-- 12500-VIME8--flAFFERTY—'5693'ORPNDVIEW--y'ORBA-L-INDA-CA^-----92086-1 -- 62611-0 29 100 DARRYL BASSANI 5729 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 30736-0 29 150 WENDELL E. BDSLEY 5771 GRANDVIEW YORDA LINDA CA 92686 -40170=0------.M--TDOU-MNAAD'SUTMAN1r-6022�MORT-ST--------YORBArtINDA-CA --92686- 51319-0 - 29 1050 RAY MAOGI 6012 SHORT ST:" - VORBA LINDA CA 92686 " '• 36339-0 29 2330 86 T NAVARRO fl1OCEWAY YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �] 992'RI DOENAY—YORBA't'INDA-CA�268 42781-1 29 2600 LARRY 210MOND 5992 RIDGENAY YORBA LIMA CA 92686 56728-0 29 2750 RAYMOND REID 5972 RIDGEWAY OR YORBA LIMA CA 92686 --r4V52=U-9--IDO�.OW!"R.-JO[2EY--'b06T-ORANDYZk1iORBAtINDA-CA'- -026S6 . 35320-0 29 3200 LEN ROGALLA - 6052 CRANDVIEW " - YORBA LIMA CA - 92686 17701-0 29 `3350 WILLIAM DE BAVN ` 6011 SHORT'ST YORBA LIMA CA"" 92606' -29 O-u MEB'NTALT:RPAT-6921-+T10RT"AT�7'ORBpY7NDA�;R —9268 46795-0 29 47" HARRY RAINVILLE 1920 KELLOCD ANAHEIM CA 92807 45139-0 29 5250 OCCUPANT 5778 GRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �399D-0-�9—�350-BOB-HA66AA]---5833'KEtt900"OR—YDRBA-"NDA-0A'T-026B 22387-0 29. _ 5400 RON'6PENCEii SB43 KELLOOG DR ' YOROA LINDA CA 926Bb - 41572-0 29 5450 DAL' DESSECKER �• S831 KELL000 DR' YORBA LIMA CA 92686 : ' - bS . 23B93-0 29 5550 RON VANDER MOOREN 3762 GRANDVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686 25819-0 29 ' 5600 QUALITY PLUS SVC 5748 GRANDVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92686 -258S9T 2V— -�fiODTMA�BTIEWHERflP-579B-ORAtmVTEN—�YORBA-L-IND `CA—'—'-92686 36580-0 29 5850 BRUCE H COOK' 5682 GRANDVIEW`. YORBA LINDA CA 92686 ND s 47326-0 29 5900 KENNETH E DREWRY 5678 ORAVIEH YORBA LINDA CA 92686 EHR1 PRI6ICA�6"!O'CRAMOV7EN—YORBpY'INOA-tA�92b8 40924-0 29 6130 ROY DUTTON 5642 GRANDVIEW YORBA LIMA CA 92666 14770-0 29 6275 RAMON SANCHEZ, JR 5592 CRANDVIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 C 1 '34 TTAFFERTY�SS6TORAMVTEW—YMBA'CIMA--C --H 'RAGE -al 14:40:29 27 APR 1990 - ,ACCV%Xt5. . ROUTE HEAD 8E0 NAME . . . . . . . SERVICE ADDR .. . .. . . CITY b STATE . .. . . . . ZIP 7CHA1T-FilA5Z 9532'GRANDVIEW 'IORSA C`INDA-CA T2686 — 38434-0 29 '6500 RAY GRANGE 5512 GRANDVIEW YORBA,LINDA CA - 92686 46233-OL ?29 ', 1 6600.STEVE HARPER ' ' 5563 MT VIEW - YORBA LINDA CA 92686 - -33%42=0^19 6...-HERB[.. UCR WOi-3553-MT-VTEV-- YORDA NDA-:R�26B6 55201-0 29 6700 EARL T. KOCHER 5566 MT. VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 52591-0 29 6800 Y CHARLES AKALP 5571 MT VIEW YORBA LINDA CA 92686 373 T-VIEW QRBA--INOA-CA —9268f 27463-0 ' 419 - -'69.00 RICHARD W HOFFMAN $611 KELLOGG DR.' ' YORBA LINDA CA 92686 F ,.48433-0 29 ::7r ��. 7000,LINDA-HOFFMAN lV >: -ii 5681 EDOECLIFF.• YORBA LINDA CA 926B6 r RAA0-367rEDOECL"1FF--YORBA MMA-CA---- 9268 50788-0 - 29 7600 RANDY VANDERHILL 5771 KELLOGG YORBA LIMA CA 92686 31129-0 29 7650 WM ROAROJASSO 5757 KELLOOO DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 l7 owm-U S7I7(Etl90C-DR YORBA-LINDA-CA -92686 1'14815-0 29 �7S50'SHERYL^.CROOK -*.'l- "5802 KELLOGG _...:YORBA LINDA CA - 92686 47329-0t -.29. :•.B43D,DR 6COTT;-HALL( '_. 5652 KELLOGG DR . YORBA LINDA CA 92686 0'VR—VORBA-LINDA-CA 92686 24439-0 29 8550 JOY WIOOIN8 5642 KELLOGG YORBA LINDA CA 92686 55621-0 29 8600 CARY MAXWELL 3600 KELLOGG DR YORBA LINDA CA 92686 B5�VAMIFF- , 775-SUNMI TYT! VQWBA-LIWDAYA �2686- EDAR CREEK ANAHEIM CA TTT I90B-MAR-CREEK—ANAMETM Zm O 39- 29 9050 ROGER PORCELLA 1912 CEDAR CREEK ANAHEIM CA 07 59-1 9050 BRUCE BORCHARDT 1912 CEDAR CREEK ANAHEIM CA 07 ITFD-NDBCNIC lli7CEDAR-CREEir—ANA1 "-Ct — 07-r-- 23-0 29 9150 ROBEKFT BUMBTEAD -E f 1920 CEDAR CREEK ANAHEIM CA 07 6-0 - 29 9250 BARRY J KOVAL 1924 CEDAR CREEK ANAHEIM CA 07 5 CEDAR CREEK--A O7 9-0 29 C J MUNDERWOOD JR 1921 CEDAR CREEK A 9 7 9-0 29 9 N UNDERN000 1921 CEDAR CREEK A A 9 7 4O -B IERSTEDT IV2IZEDAKT'REEK -9 - 2 1-0 29 916D VI NICHOL9 1917 CEDAR CREEK IM CA 9 7 3 0-0 29 9450 KHAN1 HONG 1917 CEOAR'CR ANAHEIN CA 9 7 . 90 DAMN EIM�A 2 4-0 29 9550 RONALO D NO 1909 CE K ANAHEIM CA 9 7 1 7-0 29 9600 ROBERT FULLAGA OS REEK ANAHEIM CA 9 7 ., 650STEW SEVNRHAI AA'CREEK—ANAHEIM C O7 3 6-1 29 9700 STEW CHNEIDER CREEK ANAHEIM CA 07 - 1 6-0 29 9700 I'm 6C HNEIOER 00 EK ANAHEIM CA 07 9 �8M XE1Y A VIO 08 DEER IM'CA 7 4 -O 29 9850 KENNETN H EN 1912 DEER C ANAHEIM CA 7 9 29 9830 ORE O B 1912 DEEP CRE IM CA 9 7 99 SICKT91bbEEiftR HEIM YAK 9 e, 1 -0 29 9950 BUCKLEY 1920 DEER CREEK M CA 9 7 3 -1 '2q . ' .. :y( 10 SHURTER .. -I924 DEER CREEK .-,AN A 3 - ET7 -7924-DEERZR 5 -0 29 0 JAMES CARSTAIRS 1928 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM 9 7 1 -O 29 10150 ANTHONY TERLINO 1925 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM CA 9 7 5 - DO-SHEER LUIRE Z917 DEER CREEK—ANAHEIM CA ' 1 0 -10300 SHERRI LUIRETLE ' 1913 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM CA - 9 -O MW DAVID TIBBD 1913 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM CA 9 Eft JD ON MOHLER 3905 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM 29 _ 30400 STEVEN MOHLEA 1903 DEER CREEK ANAHEIM CA -0 29 T 29 20050 STEPHEN VAUGHAN; 1707 WILLOW WOODS-C 'ANAHEIM CA ',�:. 7 .._ .. 9OIOO-RMONDA-DORDE7-�'}787-W1ttOW-NOOD9-D-ANAHE1" 7 4]-0 9' 201]0 RODDRICK JACKSON 1785 WILLOW WOODS-D ANAHEIM CA 7 31-0 20150 MAYER ROSENTHAL 1785 D WILLOW WOODS ANAHEIM CA 7 9I- MO-tRTC'OCBON -T78]-WItLOW-WOODS-C-ANAHEIM C 7 3-1 - 2 20200 5 GRADY ORAFFORD 111 1785 WILLOW WOODS-B ANAHEIM CA' 7 4-0 r29 20250 NANCY,BURROW9 1785 WILLOW WOODS A ANAHEIM CA 7 .- l 250-BRTAN�ACK-'PONEL2�17B]�11LttW-W0009-A-MlMIEIMY 7-0 29 0 CHARLOTTE FAHEY 1761 WILLOW WOODS-A ANAHEI 7 8-0 29 EFF MABEE 1761 WILLOW WOODS B AN 7 =0-29 '0 ETTE-DDUCLAS---176t" ILL"OW" OODS-B- -- ]-0 29 ": 2043 R BERNAL 1761 WILLOW WOODS-C M CA 7. 5-1 29 - ' :20430 0 RNAL 1761 WILLOW WOOD IM CA 7 1-1 99�OSSO JORN tt0 NAHe1MCA 3-0 29 20555 NAZARIO 1759 WWILLDW ANAHEIM CA .� 9 7 3-1 29 2055% EDWARD SE 1737 WI L S-D ANAHEIM CA 7 S--O—"�9�0600-JOHN AL= OD9-C�NAHEIM-CA --i 7 1-0 29 20650 GRACE R NEWMAN 5 WOODS-B ANAHEIM CA 7 ' 0-0 29 20660 JEANETTE DOUGL S OW WOODS-A ANAHEIM CA 7 7�0650TNDR WWOODS-A-ANAfEIM-CA 7-- 7-0 29 20660 GERALD D PEEL WOODS A ANAHEIM CA 7 9-0 29 20700 JACOUELINE HE ll53 ODS-A ANAHEIM CA 7 �0750'HICHAEt MC 75371Itt -B-ANAHEiN"CA---- 7- 9-0 29 20BOO FRED HE d733 C WRL ANAHEIM CA 7 9-1 29 20800 OCCUP 1757 C WILLOW ANEIM CA ` 7' 9�08 ONARO�... ..t11LN-WOOD9 TMCA 4-0 29 2085 A GARCIA 1753 D WILLOW WOODS CA 7 84-0 29 JOHN CARUSILLO 1753 WILLOW WOODS-D AN 7 RA�BTEf1tIN0—y751ti11LLDW- ODS-D-ANN1 -- 77-0 29 - SD RICHARD MADRID1751NILLOW N0009-0 ANAHEIM 7B-0 29 21000,JOHN DE-LA.RIVA 1751 WILLOW WOODS-B ANAHEIM CA �Atllti I75TNItt'O{I'NOODS�-ANNIESMY 90-0 21150 DIANE GRIFFITHS 1743 WILLOW WOODS-A ANAHEIM CA 9 7 46-0 21200 ROBIN SCRIVNER 1743 WILLOW W0005-B ANAHEIM CA 9 4 - 9�I200TATTREW�nARRD—Y743-/11tCOW DOD9-B-ANAiE,M-CA T 0 29 21200 JIM ASHLEY '- 1743 WILLOW WOODS-B AN CA 92 .29 21250 MICHAEL A SMITH . 1743 WILLOW WOODS-C ANAHEIM CA - 61708-0 29 24200 GFELLER 19162 PARKLAND YORBA LINDA CA 92686 �+6794=0--30— V =r_ROBERI-S'TERART__�5iT_"T-VIEW ORDA-LINDA-CA -9268 66529-0 30 03600 JEFF BELON9IA 5622 MT VIEW YCRDA LINDA CA 92686 66329-1 30 03600 JIM CORRIGAN 5622 MT VIEW YORDA LINDA CA 92686 _389B3 DOTCO70-BRVMBApO/T—D396-"" EW---YOROA- INDA-:A"^- 30965-0 "1"F130-� , .r'04400 JOHN RAMEREIZ 5592 MT'VIEW YOROA LINDA-CA + 92686 1333 ltnes listed. s.. QUPhxLTIONS and ANSWERS 3c3 T 3 1. Q What B I feel I should be exempt from Ne 8, Q Is this money to be wed for expanding N dwge7 Ne system l0 eccommMate more A II your property tact connected to No local growth? sewer system,you are exempt.91mpty A No.New sewer Ones are funded by attach a copy of your lax bill to substantial connection few paid by e labor al explanation and mall It m the developers of new construction projects Orange County Sanitation Districts,Box that are connected to the sewer. =� o 8127.Fountain Valley, CA M S. O Can one districa borrow from another Ym p 8272&B1 adjacent dlsrdtl that may Oe more Wry FSL an ri 2, Q I already w peg i charge for saver service No.Each gable? „{ O char My 7ger bill.Is Nla a duplicate p No.Each of the y belon Is a separate dWo g enpertyoay.The money bebngatotg he A Na.The sewer 6aMco charge you owns property ensnare of that her dis alone m payee far your nNaledon d themaim and Cennol co lint to other dion13 street sewers operated end meted*, d O T. Q I crease that under lufted oleo 13 any by the city or a local Cannery W the. Increase In lazes required voter Their sewer system comrectslo via approval District No.2 trunk sewer system.The A The user fees dorm requlm a vote 91 Dlslnd No.2 fee will be used to pay far most Proposition 13.It Is a fee far we, Me District's regional irurtlr aware and out a lax.Water pollution Central regional Vestment and disposal regulations mandated by the HuntingfadUrflo.locatedichauntansin Valleyd Emiromental Protection Agency(EPA) UU Huntington Beach that transport and mtl State health laws require w to treat and solely tlisposu of your wastewater. meet Certain public health standards. The lees will provide guilders funds to rm 3. Q lalready pay echerga to your dlgrkm on meet these mandated requirements, my tax bill.Why another Charge? protect the men of the public and keep A The charge you currently pay on your lax our waters clean. go Mll is for repayment of bonds sold many S. Q Are there other ways to wiled these years ago to pay for construction of fees without puOag them on our lax Cams of vie facllliles you are now using. bill? IM The new charges will pay for operating, A Yea.The Dhtrkta Could establish maintaining and re hatolImUng the misting sewerage system fadims. separate direct 61111ng and collection 4. O What do you mean rehabilitation? systems.The cog of operating such Y by failing systems would Increase the fees A Many segments of the sewer system were 15 to 20 percent lot the average mnturuated more than 30 years ago homeowner. end may deteriorate as they grow,older. We can Mend the Ufa of the plpea, Utrou hevequedbnscrwish 7vMerLrrmatba thereby avulding replacement, pisam.0 Um SWlall Disr{yd am®at by making improvements to the existing (71088L2411,F11crebn5. Ines and pump ggrons. WORKSHOP NO.1 WORKSHOP NO.2 Fullerton Museum Center Becks Building 301 North Pomona Avenue 201 North Bradford 0 City of Fularlon City of Placontle $ TUESDAY,MARCH 13,1990 7:30 PM THURSDAY,MARCH 22,1990 7:30 PM mum ° PUBLIC HEARING Orange Public Library 101 North Center Seoul C City of Orange WEDNESDAY,APRIL 10,1990 7:30 PM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given pursuant to California Health and Safety "o..'f. Thisfon has been satnt$55 perycar($458 amoath)for Code Section 5473.1 of a public hearing t0 be held by County residences, $33 per your fen apartments and mobile homes, and Sanitation District No. 2 at Orange County, California at $39 per 1,0001sq.fL afbuilding space per year for commercial and 7:30 m. on Wednesday,Aril 18, 1990 at the Orange Public mdustnal euaWe.with larger d _harg„ User fees are not P• aY. P 9 used for new davolupmcnt. Fees for new development sre paid for Ubrary,located at 101 North CenterStree4 Orange,California. by the developer connecting to the sewer system. Said hearing is to be held for the purpose of reviewing written reports pertaining to the providing of sewer service for all Our ongoing goal in to maintain rloctive and efficient wastewater properties within County Sanitation District No.2, and to con- management services.The challenges we must continually few are Sider public comments regarding use of the County of Orange increasing service demands as;population grown,and increasingly property tax roll for billing of District sewer service charges for stringent environmental regulations. The fees reflect the sewer collection,treatment and disposal services for the fiscal immediate fimnmnl needs of your District,and will he reviewed year commencing July 1, 1990. and solicited ve needed to continue protecting public health and our precious euviro enem PROPOSED BILLING AND COLLECTION METHOD m A 9 1 C wry S Q q° County Sanitation District No. 2 is proposing to collect its sewer °•+h m� service uerr fen an a separate line item on the annual property me bill. Ueeafthm=.. tatfeetivnsltrmntivemethadwauldallow the Districts and its antac ers to saw the costs of producing, RamvO1 ��'r(.Jt 9°3 mailing and bnallingseparate utility bills for direct payments property owner within the District rivn an annual pwpe o prepertyta:billhom the CoantyTa:CoDector. C California Bealth p y - and Safety CodeSection5473 allows the District to plain oursewer amoon a,ww * - userfeconthiabillseaseparefelineitemthuspmvidingtheuxr with the convenience of including payment fen District No. 2 sewerage service with property tax payments. 9 �• A fr Therefore,effective with the billing year beginning July 1,1990, a s pie the Board of Directors of Diatriet No. 2 is proposing to use this :'• billing method to help keep the cast of service down. The above F noticed public hearing is to consider the proposal to um the pro� % +' separate directdirect and mom costly billing tout bill to mIlect the annual�ecod er fee instead of e 1 FURTHER INFORMATION/PUBUC WORKSHOPS The question and emwer section of this notice attempts to address some of the questions you may have.In addition,two workshops haw been scheduled where staff will provide mom detailed Wastewater from your home or 6usinaseis collected by your local questions and will be available to nonwer my additional street sewer systems,which is msintn quastiom(see hack side of mailer far Creations). distrieL The street aewere Dow into largo interceptor sews your area owned by County Sanitation District No. 2. District No. $ the shaded area of the pap,is ono of nine Districts that make up the DISTRICT NO.2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, OPERATING FUND which serve the metropolitan area of the a0 RESERVES DEFICIT PROJECTION county.These Distirla jaintl➢owns idaperate the regional sewage treatment plants in 39 E]�ENSEs Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach The Sanitation Districts are charged with 30 protectingpublic health and the environment. M CARRYOVER 8 REVENUE I The Sanitation Districts operations arc L 0 regulated by federal and state environmental � DEFICIT-go--. In recent years,these agencies haw ° RESERVES adopted and imposed come stringent Lows and N t6 regulations to protect our environment. In order to comply with the new regulations,new s advanced sewage treatment facilities, coating 1a EMM.vES REVENUE hundreds of millions of dollars, haw been constructed. The additional facilities haw s resulted in increased operating meta a Rising costa and decreasing rr_servea were 87-M M-89 89.90 95.91 91.92 9290 S3_ o fardug District No.2 into a financial crisis by 1990 (see graph). To continua providing the FlSCALYEAR high level of service you are accustomed to, District No.2 recently adapted a sewer service July 12, 1999 From: Arthur D. Newsham 5321 Grandview Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92896 7141-777-41069 TO: PARR Committee SUBJECT: Item N13d PARR99-58 on PARR Committee Heating Agenda for July 14,1999. Sewer Connection Pee Waiver Request From City of Yorba Linda Homeowners Speaking on behalf of my three neighbors and myself, I hereby express disagreement with the GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION as well as the ALTERNATIVES provided in the final section of the PANIC Committee Agenda Report prepared by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Director of Finance. Point R1. Examination of Attachment B to the Agenda Report Indicates that this Notice of Public Hearing was bulk mailed in March or April 1990 and was not enclosed with the property tax bill. The notice did not highlight the significance of not being connected to the sewer. Its focus was to notify the public of OCSD'S intent to use the property tax rolls to collect a sewer cbarge for providing newer service to all properties within the area. When included an Attachment B to the Agenda Report the Finance Department blocked out and used an arrow to highlight the section of the public notice that related to properties not connected to the newer. Obviously the OCSD knew numerous homeownera in Sanitation District No. 2 were not connected to the sewer system and should have made an effort to exclude them when implementing an arbitrary cost-saving approach for the collection of a new sewer charge. The OCSD made no effort to notify homeowners when mailing the property tax billings in late 1990 or in subsequent years. Point N2. When in 1990 the OCSD Finance Department received a request for tax exemption they, an stated In paragraph 1 on page 3 of the Agenda Report, 'requested verification from the Yorba Linda water District that these parcels were in fact not connected to the local sewer system. Due to the number of calls that Yorba Linda Water District was receiving from the DSatrict's Finance Department, they provided a computer listing of all property addresses within Yorba Linda that were not connected. . . Finance staff than used this listing an a verification tool against all written requests. . .'. At this point in 1990 the OCSD Finance Department had all the information necessary to correct the error on the property tax rolls and recognized their responsibility for implementing the necessary corrections. Very simply the Yorba Linda Water District list eliminated any need for individual written requests. Rased on paragraph 2 on Pape 3 of the Agenda Report over 74 percent (662/090) of the affected homeowners in Yorba Linda have still not been removed from the Revenue Area No.2 sewer taxation roll. Using the calculations in Paragraph 3 on page 3 of the Agenda Report, this yields over $460,000 that the OCSD Finance Department will have collected through tax year 1999-00 by intentionally not taking corrective action. Furthermore, they were also aware that their initial approach to identifying Yorba Linda homeowners who should not be taxed was only 25 percent effective. Corrective action should have been taken in 1990 not 19991 Point #3. The accounting practice of the OCSD Finance Department should be held to a standard that is at least equivalent to that imposed on an orange county property tax payer by the County Treasurer- Tax Collector. For late payment of the property tax bill to which the newer fee was arbitrarily added, a 10 percent penalty, a $10 annual cost fee and 1.5 percent interest compounded monthly on the unpaid balance are charged. The value of the improperly charged sewer fee with penalties, cost fees and interest compounded over 9 years exceeds my sewer connection fee ($1860) as recommended in paragraph 2 on page 3 of the Agenda Report. In a different venue, the penalties could be even higher if the over-collection was determined to be intentional based on demonstrated knowledge of improper fee collection and for over 9 yearn refusing to implement corrective action. Point #d. Based on California law all rights and privileges to a property are transferred to the new property owner unless specifically identified in the Grant Dead. The Revauue Area No. 2 sewer taxation fee is not normally referenced or inferred on the Grant Deed. It is not identified on our Grant Deeds. Therefore any and all refunds or benefits go to the current.property owner. With regard to correcting the overall problem, I applaud the OCSD Finance Department's recommendation to identify homeowners who are not connected to a local sewer system. However the Finance Department's self-asseasment is expectedly superficial and consequently the recommended and alternative corrective action proposals for financial compensation fall far abort of a fair resolution. The implementation of item 3 from the ALTERNATIVES Section of the Agenda report is a good start. This alternative recommendation should be augmented with appropriate penalties an well an interest and should include an option to waive the sewer connection fee for a homeowner who connects to the local sewer within a reasonable time (12 months) . In closing, please review the letter addressed to the Chairperson of the DCSD Board of Directors from the Yorba Linda Water District. This letter requests that the sewer hookup fee for the four subject properties be waived. Please recommend implementation of thin request. Thank you Art Newnham . RL YORBA LINDA <622 PLUMOSA DRIVE • P.O.BOX 309,YORBA LINDA.CALIFORNIA 92865�3 PHONE:(714)n7-YLWD WATER DISTRICT FAX:(714)7014413 July 12, 1999 Ms. Jan Debay,Chairperson Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Subject: Sewer Connection Fee Waiver Dear Ms. Debay: On July 8, 1999, Mr. Art Newsham appeared before the Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors on behalf of himself, and his neighbors on Grandview Avenue in the City of Yorba Linda. Mr. Newsham requested this District's assistance in recovering sewer maintenance fees they paid even though the property is not connected to the sewer system. The Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors discussed the matter at length and voted unanimously to request that the Orange County Sanitation District 1) waive the sewer connection fees for the four residential homes located on Grandview Avenue; or alternative 2) apply the fees paid by each parcel,with interest, to the current property owner as a credit toward future sewer connection fees. Your consideration of this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Yorba Linda Water District Arthur C. Kom, President cc Mr. John Gullixson, Mayor, City of Yorba Linda Don McIntyre, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARK ABRAMONRTZ PAUL R ARMSTRONG BRETT R.BARBRE MICHAEL J.BEVERAGE AMUR C. KORN GENERAL MANAGERSECRETARY BUSINESS MARAGER/AUDTTOR WILLIAMJ ROBERTSON BEVERLY META FAHR COMMITTEE Neeaag Date To ad.al ar. 7-1499 7-riA9 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR99-60 15(a1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Marc D. Dubois, Contracts / Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: ESTABLISHING A PILOT PROCUREMENT CARD PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Authorize Contracts/ Purchasing Manager to proceed with a pilot procurement card program with selected staff utilizing the American Express procurement card program for a six-month period effective August 1, 1999; and, 2) Authorize the Contracts / Purchasing Manager to implement a full-scale procurement program if said program suggests benefits of costs savings and staff time. SUMMARY In May of 1998, the Director of Finance presented a recommendation to the FAHR Committee to develop policies and procedures and enter into an agreement with the State of California for participation in the Cal-Card procurement card system. The FAHR Committee directed staff to bring those policies and procedures back to the Committee for approval; and enter into a standard agreement with the State of California for participation in the Cal-Card procurement card system. Since then, staff has continued to investigate other procurement card programs and found the American Express Corporate Card program to provide a more comprehensive system, offering detailed reports such as expanded account summaries, card member reports, spending trends, industry reports, etc. In addition, the American Express program does not charge any service fees to the District, as did the State of California Cal-Card program. As the District continues to strive towards lower costs and greater efficiency, the proposed implementation of a pilot procurement card program appears to offer great opportunities for dramatically streamlining procurement processes, reducing costs associated with the purchase orders, reducing invoice volume in Accounts Payable, leveraging new technology, improving vendor relations, and providing metrics to determine if cost savings goals and objectives are being achieved. All purchases would continue to be made in accordance with current Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority limits and procedures. Recently, two independent consultant companies, DMG Maximus and Hilton, Farnkoph & Hobson, conducted studies on Finance Department operations and District-wide clerical support. Both studies strongly recommended the implementation of a procurement card system to increase staff efficiencies and save money on transactional costs for small dollar procurements. H%r daa�agendalB Agenda RemnaAIW. ewN Agenda Rey%W?9aabm%5(d)gad R-.ed ar Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Various studies suggest that public agencies can spend up to $100 to process a purchase order and cut a company check for each purchase they make - large or small. In fact, for most agencies, the number of repetitive, low dollar, non-strategic purchases is substantial, with as much as 80% of an agencies purchasing transactions accounting for only 20% of its total purchasing dollars. It has been estimated that a procurement card program can shave an average of$24.49 off each transaction for a participating agency. In addition, the elimination of small, repetitive procurements provides staff more opportunities for value-added functions such as enhanced contract analysis, aggressive negotiations on commodity contracts, e-commerce, and other progressive cost saving strategies. A well managed procurement card program offers a convenient and cost effective purchasing mechanism with spending, commodity and supplier restrictions built directly into the card. The restrictions will include the maximum amount to be spent per transaction, per day, and per month. The controls established with each card provide checks and balances as transactions are made, not after the purchase has been made. If a purchase outside the controls established by the Purchasing Division is attempted, the charge will be declined at the point of sale. Procurement Card supplier acceptance Part of the Purchasing division's research into a procurement card program was to ensure the selected card system had substantial suppler acceptance. According to Purchasing Magazine, eighty six percent (86%) of the top fifty recognized MRO suppliers accept the American Express purchasing card. In addition, 44,000 current suppliers can provide enhanced data on purchases, and new suppliers are being added at approximately 500 per month. Survey results and notable users The Purchasing Division staff did a phone survey of our member agencies. The agencies currently utilizing a procurement card program are as follows: Anaheim, Brea, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach (implementation phase), Villa Park, Westminster, Yorba Linda, Irvine Ranch Water District, and the County of Orange. Most of our other member agencies were either implementing a card program for the next fiscal year or studying the issue for future implementation. HMW �lb AGeMa Fegv4".BaaN.1.ReMa`OlWh 1, )Ox R. va.Ra Page 2 v Other notable users were City of Pasadena, UC Irvine, Metropolitan Water District, Union Sanitary District, LA County Metro Transit Authority, Orange County Transit Authority, County of San Diego, East Bay Municipal Utility District. The State of California has indicated that hundreds of cities, counties and special districts are utilizing a procurement card program to some degree throughout the state. Potential Drawbacks Some drawbacks are potential and some will certainly be realized. They are presented here to enable a "cost-benefit" analysis. All are fully addressed in attached pilot program policies, procedures and controls. The purpose of the pilot program is to refine and to perfect these controls. • Purchaser must maintain records for use and approval. • Purchaser must reconcile use and invoice each month. • An "approving official" must review and approve all purchases for appropriate users in department and division. • Cards must be deactivated upon termination of employment. • Abuse is possible when written policies and procedures are not followed or reviewed. • Credit card use is a favorite target of investigative reporters. Potential Benefits Reported or potential benefits to the District include: • Streamlines the procurement cycle. • Eliminates many low-value, low-quality invoices (also benefits vendor). • Reduces number of warrants written for low values • Reduces emergency check and petty cash requests • Reduces "order-taking" activities in Purchasing. • Frees Purchasing Division staff for price analysis, negotiation, and service improvement. • Provides "cash discounts" as vendors are paid in 1-3 days. • The program will provide an average savings of $24.49 or more per transaction. • Translates empowerment and bottoms up philosophy into action. • Leverages new technology. Typical Process The program is intended to be simple and easy to use. Typically, the process can be summarized as: • Make an appropriate, authorized purchase (can be in person, by fax, by phone, or by mail). HF ft. genEa�WABeM.Re{w %IM 8-M ABendo Ne ft lB 15W).gc[ Ranee, 5w,se Page 3 • Use the procurement card to pay for purchase (remind vendors not to invoice, a payment will be received from American Express in 1-3 days). ' • Save the receipt and other supporting documentation. • Record the purchase in the Purchasing Card Use Log (include information needed for proper cost accounting). • Compare the monthly statement from American Express to the Purchasing Card Use Log and receipts each month. • Sign the monthly statement from American Express to authorize payment. • Send the signed monthly statement, the Purchasing Card Use Log, receipts, and other documentation to Accounts Payable. ALTERNATIVES Continue to use the purchase order procedure augmented by petty cash reimbursement and hand check preparation. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Proposed policies & procedures instruction manual H Apm aRe{oWIM fV Ape a RepvhU']W:em 15W)GY Rene• anise Page 4 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THE PROCUREMENT CARD (Procard) Policies & procedures Instruction Manual C%Tl W PordocPm Wum flw .mo Pro-card/p&ps.doc Procurement Card (Procard) Policies & Procedures Instruction Manual a Table of Contents Program Overview ........................................................................... Page 3 Section 1: Obtaining a Procard ....................................................... Page 4 Application Process ......................................................................... Page 4 Procard Security ............................................................................. Page 5 Section 2: Purchasing with the Procard .......................................... Page 6 Commodity Guidelines ..................................................................... Page 5 Placing Procard Orders .................................................................... Page 7 ProductDelivery ............................................................................. Page 6 Section 3: Managing Your Procard Account.................................... Page 9 Documenting Your Procard Transactions ............................................. Page 9 Reconciling Your Procard Transactions ............................................... Page 10 Section4: Returns and Disputes ................................................... Page 11 ProcessingReturns ........................................................................ Page 11 Handling Billing Disputes ................................................................. Page 12 Section 5: Things You Should Know&Things You Do Not Want To Do Page 13 Extended Absence, Changes, Audit and Enforcement ............................ Page 13 APPENDIXA ................................................................................. Page 14 Page 2 Pro-card/p&ps.doc W Procurement Card (Procard) Program - Overview Purpose The Procard Program allows you, the end user, to purchase goods and services with a total dollar value less than $1,000 using a credit card. The program enables the District to eliminate the purchase requisition, purchase order, invoice and check requirements for these purchases. The Procard is an American Express Corporate Purchasing Card issued through the American Express Company to support District procurement functions, It is an ideal tool to streamline the procurement process, and is the preferred method to purchase most goods and services under$1,000 (see exceptions listed on page 6). Any exceptions granted under this program must be approved by the Contracts/Purchasing Manager and must be documented in writing. Benefits End users will: • Obtain goods and services faster and easier than before • Reduce paperwork and processing time • Increase productivity • Have the ability to electronically track individual and group Procard activity Purchasing &Accounts Payable will: • Reduce transaction volumes for low dollar purchases • Issue one (1) check per month to the American Express Company vs. multiple checks to multiple suppliers • Be able to increase customer service to end-users on higher value purchases District Suppliers will: • Receive immediate payment Contents Section Name See Page 1 Obtaining a Procard 4 2 Purchasing with the Procard 6 3 Manaoino Your Procard Account 9 4 Returns & Disputes 11 Things You Should Know & Things You Do 5 Not Want to Do 13 Page 3 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 1: Obtaining a Procard Q Application Process Policy Regular full time, District employees are eligible to use the Procard in accordance with established delegation of authority, with their manager's approval and when there is a demonstrated need and cost savings. If you place an order with a total transaction value (including tax and freight) under$1,000 from a supplier who accepts American Express, we strongly encourage you to take advantage of the benefits of the Procard. Requirements There are three (3) requirements for receiving your Procard: • Procard Administrator and Contracts/Purchasing Manager both agree the District will benefit from employee obtaining Procard • A signed Employee Procard Agreement • Completion of Procard Training Application Process To obtain a Procard, follow the process below. For assistance, call the Procard Administrator. Stage Who Does It What Happens 1 Employee The Procard Administrator agrees with the employee's request for a Procard (must have concurrence of Contract/Purchasing Manager and Department Head). 2 Dept/Div Head & Both sign Employee Procurement Card Employee Agreement 3 Procard Administrator . Updates District's Authorized Signer's List with employee Procard approval. . Processes application with card issuer . Helps employee register for Procard training. 4 Employee . Attends training . After training, receives Procard. . Procard is active immediately upon receipt. Page 4 Pro-card/p&ps.doc V Section 1: Obtaining a Procard Procard Security Introduction Your Procard should always be treated with great care, the same as your own personal credit card. The only person entitled to use the Procard is the person whose name appears on the face of the card. Remember YOU are the only person authorized to use your card. Safeguarding The following security measures should be taken to safeguard your Procard: • Do keep your Procard in an accessible but secure location • Do guard your Procard account number carefully • Do not post your Procard account number at your desk or write it in any other place that is accessible to others • Do not lend your Procard to another person Policy., Lost or Stolen Procards It is very important that cardholders secure them properly. Failure to promptly report a lost, misplaced or stolen Procard may result in the District seeking reimbursement from the cardholder for unauthorized charges. Procedure: Lost or Stolen Procards To report a lost or stolen Procard, please use the following procedure: Step Action 1 Notify American Express immediately at (800) 492-4920. Representatives are available 24 hrs/day, 7 days/week. Provide the representative with requested Procard information, the card will be deactivated immediately. 2 Notify Districts Procard Administrator, American Express will provide Procard Administrator with a replacement card typically within 5-7 days. Page 5 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 2: Purchasing with the Procard y Commodity Guidelines Policy The Procard could be used for all District business-related purchases under $1,000 unless identified in the exceptions listed below. EXCEPTIONS In conjunction with the District Supplier Listing, the Procard can be used anywhere the American Express card is accepted with the following exceptions: ® No Cash Advancements ® No Tuition Reimbursements ® No Computer Hardware/Software purchases except IT Director (or his/her designee) ® No Office Furniture or fixed assets purchases. OTHER EXCEPTIONS: Purchase Order or District ContracHAgreemenf Required The following goods and services must be obtained through the use of a District Purchase Order or District contractlagreement, originating from a completed and approved Purchase Requisition Form submitted by the employee ® Capital Equipment ® Professional Services Agreements (all) ® Maintenance & Repair Services or Parts/Supplies (when individual transaction exceeds$1,000 Procard limit) ® Public Work Contracts (all) ® Transactions made possible through the use/access of established District Blanket orders ® Temporary Services Agreements- HR (all) ® Engineering/Surveying/Architectural Agreements (all) ® Instruction and/or Artistic Services Agreements (all) Page 6 Pro-card/p&ps.doc v Section 2: Purchasing with the Procard Placing Procard Orders Policy When involved in any aspect of purchasing, you are acting as an agent of the Orange County Sanitation District. You are therefore responsible to act in the best interest of the District. Your actions must not show personal favoritism to a supplier at the expense of the District. Responsibilities There are two types of transaction limits: • Dollars per transaction - maximum limit is $999.00 • Transaction dollars per month - maximum limit $5,000, which may be raised at the request of the Division Manager with concurrence of the Procard Administrator. Your Authorization Limits are attached to your OCSD Employee Procurement Card Agreement. These limits may be adjusted to meet your departmental/divisional needs with your manager's approval. For assistance, contact the Procard Administrator. Acceptance of the Procard The Procard is an American Express card and can be used where American Express is accepted. (If the supplier is not set up to accept American Express, refer them to the American Express Company for assistance.) The Procard may be rejected If: • You have exceeded your individual transaction dollar limit • You have exceeded your monthly transaction dollar limit • Your Procard has been canceled, or reported lost or stolen Should this occur, contact the Procard Administrator for assistance. Procedure The procedure for placing Procard orders is as follows: Stop Action 1 Identify goods and services required to perform job-related task. 2 Determine that goods are not in stock in Warehouse and determine if urchase is within vour Procard Authorization Limits 3 Ensure the items are not on the exception list see a e 8 4 Obtain pricing, stock and delivery information for items needed. Order kerns or services that are immediately available. Ensure one complete shipment or nick-u er Procard order. No partialsl see page 8 5 Ensure the supplier immediately processes the Procard authorization with American Express r7— Immediate) u ate our Procard Transaction Lo see a e 9 Retain all Procard receipts, packing lists and shipping documents in a safe place until you are ready to reconcile your monthly statement, as you will need to forward these with your reconciled monthly statement. Page 7 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 2: Purchasing with the Procard Product Delivery Policy Procard orders must be shipped complete. If the supplier does not have all of the items in stock, order only what is immediately available. You may order the balance on a separate transaction later when the items are in stock. Likewise, if a needed service is desired to be performed over several intervals, order the services on separate transactions. Supplier Shipments Please use the following procedure for supplier shipments: Step Action 1 Order item(s) or request service(s) that are immediately available. Do not allow the supplier to make a partial shipment, backorder the balance, and charge you for the total quantity. 2 Request the supplier enclose a copy of the Procard sales receipt with each shi ment. 3 Give the supplier complete shipping instructions, including your name, location address, and your mailsto . 4 Request the supplier note on the outside of the package in bold letters "Procard Purchase" and "Your Name". This will ensure the package gets forwarded unopened, directly to you, or identified at the warehouse. 5 Inform the supplier they are NOT to write your Procard number anywhere that will be visible to anyone other than ourself- 8 Upon receipt of goods and services ordered, file your Procard receipt, packing list and shipping document in a safe place until you are ready to reconcile your monthly statement, as you will need to forward these with your reconciled monthly statement. Will Call Orders& Services Performed On-Site Please use the following procedure for will call orders and on-site services: Step Action 1 Ensure you receive all Items/services in the quantities specified on your Procard receipt 2 Obtain your copy of the Procard sales receipt at time of will call or on-site erfornance of services. 3 File your Procard receipt in a safe place until you are ready to reconcile your monthly statement, as you will need to forward these with your reconciled monthiv statement. Page 8 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 3: Managing Your Procard Account Documenting Your Procard Transactions Policy You are required to maintain the following records and documentation: • Procard Transaction Log • Monthly Procard File Transaction Log The Procard Transaction Log (see Appendix A) should be updated immediately each time you make a purchase. The transaction log contains the following fields: • Transaction/purchase date • Merchantisupplier name • Itemiservice description • Transaction total • Delivery/service date • Notes Procard File Maintain a separate file for each month containing the following information: • Original Procard receipts • Packing lists • Shipping documents • Any other supporting documentation Page 9 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 3: Managing Your Procard Account Reconciling Your Procard Transactions Policy Procard holders are required to substantiate all transactions shown on their monthly billing statements, and edit the account code(s) for accurate cost accounting. Once the Procard Administrator has informed you that the monthly statement is ready for review and verification, you have approximately one (1) week to complete your verification (the Procard Administrator will provide you with a specific due date each month). If you will be unavailable to complete the required review during this time, you are responsible for designating someone in your area to complete it in your absence. If your approved billing statement and supporting documentation is not submitted to the Procard Administrator by the monthly due date, your Procard transaction limit will be set to ZERO until the information is received. After the second occurrence, your Procard will be canceled. Procedure Please use the following procedure to reconcile your Procard transactions: Stage Who Does It What Happens 1 Employee Retrieve your personal Procard statement and verify purchases against transaction log. • Record sales tax for each transaction (where it is missing from the statement). • Verify and/or change budget account code(s) and sub- ledgers for each transaction. 2 Employee Copy the statement, attach all original receipts and packing slips (if original receipt is not available, a faxed copy of the original is acceptable). 3 Employee Forward original Procard statement with attached documentation to the Prorard Administrator, who will then forward to Accounts Payable. The Procard Administrator may request forwarding of statement and documentation directly to Accounts Payable. Page 10 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 4: Returns and Disputes Processing Returns & Billing Errors Policy Merchandise returns and billing errors are the cardholder's responsibility. Procard is much like a consumer credit card — cardholders must communicate with suppliers to process returns, correct billing errors, and ensure the proper credit has been issued. In most cases, returns and errors can be resolved directly between the cardholder and the supplier. Procedure Use the following procedure to handle returned items: Step Action 1 Contact the supplier that provided the item/service to discuss the problem and agree to a solution. (For billing errors not involving a return, skip to Step 5 . 2 Request return instructions and/or obtain a Returned Materials Authorization RMA number from vour merchant. 3 Package and ship product back to merchant. Put RMA number on inside and outside of packs e. 4 Obtain a mailing or shipping receipt for the package. This will be needed in case the merchant does not process the credit promptly. 5 Verify that credit has been processed on the next monthly statement. Page 11 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Section 4: Returns and Disputes b Handling Billing Disputes Definition A dispute is the action taken by the cardholder to notify the American Express Company, that a specked charge(s) appearing on the monthly statement is (are) an unauthorized transaction(s). Policy The cardholder is responsible for resolving all disputes with American Express. The Purchasing Division will not handle disputes. All charges will be paid upon invoicing. Once the cardholder has reached a resolution with American Express, a credit to the cardholder's account will be processed on the next billing cycle. American Express Customer Service American Express Customer Service Representatives are available 7days/wk, 24hrs/day by calling (800)492-4920 (this number is also located on the back of your Procard). Procedure Because you, the cardholder, are the closest person to the transaction, you should resolve dispute issues first with the supplier. Typically, most issues can be handled at this level with the supplier placing a credit on your Procard account. If unsuccessful at resolving the issues with the supplier, you may open a Customer Dispute using the following procedure: Step Action 1 When reconciling your monthly statement, dispute the charge in questions on the statement This will NOT stop the payment, but will flag A/P that you dis ute the Rem. 2 Call American Express at (800) 492-4920 to open a Customer Dispute. An American Express Customer Service Representative will assist you in working through this process. Expect this process to take 3-4 weeks to com ate. 3 Inform the Procard Administrator of your Customer Dispute by email. Page 12 Pro-card/p&ps.doc J Section 5: Things You Should Know & Things You Do Not Want To Do Extended Absence, Changes, Audit& Enforcement Extended If you will be absent from the District for an extended period, please seek assistance from the Procard Administrator to determine the best options to cover your procurement card responsibilities. Changes If you change departments or leave the District it is imperative that you contact the Procard Administrator. If you are making an internal move (to a new department or division), you will need to complete a new application and have it signed by your new manager. Audits To ensure the continued success of the Procard Program, your account number will be open to internal audit requirements. Monthly review of your files may be conducted by the internal Procard Team. Enforcement Statements Not Reconciled - Your Procard will be canceled if monthly reconciliations are not received by the specified due date. Personal use of the Procard- Personal use of the Procard will NOT be tolerated and will result in: • Disciplinary measures that may include termination and/or legal action • Permanent revocation of the card • Direct payroll deductions for any unauthorized or personal charges made on the Procard Termination of Employment - Your must return your Procard to the Procard Administrator when you leave/terminate your employment with the District. Page 13 Pro-card/p&ps.doc The Procurement Card (Procard) Instruction Manual Appendix A Who To Call Orange County Sanitation District Procard Administrator-Chris Maher Tel.: (714)593-7582 Fax: (714)965-0728 Email: cmaher(a)ocsd.wm Procard Administrator (Backup) - Robert Thiede Tel.: (714)593-7586 Fax: (714)965-0728 Email: rthiede(cDocsd.com American Express Customer Service: (800) 492-4920 Lost/Stolen Card: (800)492-4920 Procard Documents District's Employee Procurement Card Agreement: Location— Copy attached, contact Procard Administrator for additional copies Procard Transaction Log: Location — Copy attached, contact Procard Administrator for additional copies or print from nlglobal/forms Page 14 Pro-card/p&ps.doc Orange County Sanitation District Employee Procurement Card Agreement 1. This agreement outlines the responsibilities I have as a holder of the District's Procurement Card (Procard). 2. 1 understand that the Procard is intended to facilitate the purchase and payments of goods and services for the conduct of District business, and is not for my personal use. 3. 1 understand that I will be responsible for the use of my Procard as outlined in the Procard Instruction Manual and misuse of the Procard, on my part, is grounds for (a) disciplinary measures that may include termination and/or legal action, (b) permanent revocation of the Prowrd, and/or(c) direct payroll deduction for any unauthorized or personal charges made on the Procard. 4. 1 understand that all charges will be billed directly to and paid directly by the District. I understand that American Express cannot accept any payment from me directly. 5. 1 understand the Proven) is issued in my name. I will not allow other individuals to use my Procard. 6. 1 understand that the Procard is the property of the Orange County Sanitation District and, therefore, I may be periodically required to comply with internal control procedures designed to protect District assets. This may include being asked to produce the Procard to verify its existence and providing assistance in an audit review of its use. 7. 1 understand that I will receive a statement of purchase activity for the statement period. I am responsible for all charges on the Procard (but not for payment), and I will resolve any discrepancies by either contacting the merchant/supplier or American Express. I understand that I will be required to(1) obtain and retain a copy of the cash register receipt or packing slip until the monthly statement for the Procard is received, (ii) verify the receipt against the statement, (iii) attach a printed statement with all receipts/packing slips secured to the back of the statement, and Civil forward this paperwork to the Procard Administrator, or designated staff member, as determined by the Procard Administrator. It. I agree to code charges to budget accounts consistent with the types of purchases authorized by the manager(s)for those budget accounts. If by doing so, additional budget authorization becomes necessary, I understand that I am responsible for obtaining any additional budgetary authorization BEFORE forwarding my monthly statement to the Procard Administrator, or designated area. 9. 1 understand that the Procard must be surrendered it requested by the District for any reason and/or upon my termination of employment from the District, or change of Division/Department. My signature below indicates that my Department Head and I have read and understand my responsibilities as a Procard holder, and that I agree to adhere to the guidelines established for the program as outlined in the Procard Instruction Manual and this agreement. I also agree to be responsible for my Procard use (as intended by the District) and authorize the District to deduct charges resulting from my misuse of the Procard,from my paycheck. Employee Signature Date Employee Name Dept/Div: (Please Print) Dept. Head signature Dale Dept. Head Name Dept/Div: (Please Print) MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT June 16, 1999, 7:30 a.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom at the OCSD offices at 7:30 a.m. on June 16, 1999. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors John Collins, Vice Chaimuut. Norman Eckenrode,Peer Swan, and General Manager Donald F. McIntyre,Alternate; OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony,Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.,and Iry Pickler,Chairman;and OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr., Alternate. Staff attending were Tom Dawes. GWR System Project Manager; OCSD staff: Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman,Planning Manager Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering David Ludwin, Director of Operations and Maintenance Bob Goren,OCWD staff: Associate General Managers Steve Conklin and John Kennedy,Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth, Public Affairs Specialist Jennifer Greenlief,Administrative Assistant Jill Everhart,Administrative Assistant Cathy Skousen, Senior Engineer Greg Leslie, Senior Engineer Tom Sovich. Others in attendance included OCWD Director Jerry King; Pervaiz Anwar, Brown&Caldwell; Kellene Bum-Lucht,Bruce Chalmers, Suzanne Rowe and Dick Corneille, CDM; Steve Tedesco, ASL; Bruce Mowry, CH2M Hill; Mike Rudimica, RBF; Mo Hayes, Eric Mischke,and Bob Getter, Parsons; Dave Argo,Black &Veatch; Bob Caustin, Defend the Bay and Harold Glaser, Montgomery Watson. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Conduct workshop on consultant selection for Proiect Develooment Phase. GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes gave a presentation on the process used for the staff review of the proposals received for the Project Development Phase. He reviewed the background of the Project Development Phase,the process and the reasons the staff Proposal Review Team recommends the CDM Team. The selection panel was introduced to the Committee. They are: Project Manager Tom Dawes,OCWD Director of Engineering Steve Conklin,OCWD Director of Planning John Kennedy, OCSD Director of Engineering David Ludwin,OCSD Director of Operations and Maintenance Bob Omen,OCSD Director of Planning Jim Herberg and independent consultant Jim Williams. After the presentation the Committee discussed in detail the selection process of the recommended CDM Team as pan of that discussion. Dick Corneille of the CDM Team was asked to review his background and qualifications to the Committee. ADJOURNMENT The Committee adjourned at 9:40 a.m. The next meeting of the Joint GWR System Committee is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., Monday,June 21, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. at OCWD. a MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT June 21, 1999, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom at the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on June 21, 1999. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors John Collins,Vice Chairman, Norman Eckemode, Peer Swan,and General Manager Donald F. McIntyre,Alternate; OCWD Directors Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.,Philip L. Anthony(arrived 6:00 p.m.)and Iry Pickleq Chairman; and OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr., Alternate. Staff attending were Tom Dawes, GWR System Project Manager;OCSD staff: Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson,Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman, Planning Manager Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering David Ludwin; OCWD staff: Associate General Managers Steve Conklin and John Kennedy, General Counsel Clark Ide, Senior Engineers Greg Leslie, Michio Miyake and Doug Biglen,Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth,Public Affairs Specialist Jennifer Grecnlief, Senior Administrative Assistant Cathy Skousen and Administrative Assistant Jill Everhart. Others in attendance included: Bill Everest, Boyle Engineering; Don Greek,DGA Consultants,Bob Finn and Pervaiz Anwar,Brown&Caldwell;Kelli Bum-Lucht, Suzanne Rowe,Bruce Chalmers and Dick Corneille, CDM; Bruce Mowry, CH2M Hill; and Jim Williams, Independent Consultant. 1. Minutes of orevious meetings The minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held May 25, 1999 and the Joint Committee Workshop held June 16, 1999 were approved upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Collins and carried,with Director Anthony absent. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Actions on GWR System Project Development GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes presented staffs recommendation for issuance of a Professional Services Agreement in a matter of meeting with general counsel's approval to Camp Dresser&McKee Inc., in an amount not to exceed$4,810,300 for the Project Development Phase of the GWR System. Also presented were staffs recommendations for issuance of Task Orders to 2.) Separation Processes, Inc,in an amount not to exceed$403,280 and to 3.)Carl R. Nelson, in an amount not to exceed$53,000. Director Swan requested that the allocation of monies for the visitor's center be identified by staff at the next meeting. Upon motion by Director Eckenrode,seconded by Director Collins and carried,with Director Anthony absent,the Joint Committee recommended that the Boards approve a Professional Service Agreement,in a manner meeting General Counsel's approval,with d Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.,in an amount not to exceed $4,810,300 for the GWR System Project Development Phase; approve issuance of a Task Order to Separation Processes, Inc.,for an amount not to exceed$403,280; and the Joint Committee approved a Task Order to Carl R.Nelson,in an amount not to exceed$53,000. 3. Health Risk Assessment Greg Leslie informed the Committee that Eisenberg, Oliveri &Associates(EOA)has assembled an independent advisory committee(IAC)to review the protocol of the health risk assessment study. The fast meeting will be held at OCWD on July 16 from 10:00 am. until noon. Robert C.Cooper,Ph.D., Professor UCB has been chosen to chair the committee. Other members are George Tchobaanoglous, Ph.D., P.E.,Professor UCD,Eddie Wei,Ph.D. Professor UCB, Douglas Brawfor-Brown,Ph.D., University of North Carolina and Margeret Nellor,P.E., LACSD. An IAC with ex-officio members has also been invited,which will serve as observers only. They include,John Hills, City of Anaheim:Dr.Rick Sakaji,Frank Hamamura and Dr. Steve Book,Department of Health Services; Hope Smythe,RWQCB;and congressional science fellows Dr.Neysa Call(Office of Congressman George Brown)and Wayne Paugh(Office of Congressman Dana Rohrbacher). Committee members were encouraged to attend and an agenda will be sent to the Joint Committee ahead of the meeting. 4. Status Renort Mr. Dawes reported on the following matters: 1. Grant Activities a. The California Energy Commission has a new person in charge,Robert Pennell. Staff will meet in Sacramento with select CEC commissioners and staff on July 13, 1999. b. The Environmental Protection Agency grant may not be available until January or February 2000. The federal Record of Decision(ROD)is being delayed by the Bureau of Reclamation(BOR)and cannot be approved until a BOR archeologist inspects the site. 2. Public Information Program. a. Newsletter No. 2. The newsletter is at the printers and should be mailed very shortly. b. Letter to City Councils. Director Pickler has sent a letter to 16 cities in our service area that have not received a presentation on the GWR System stating that our staff would like to do so. 2 c. Media Training. The Joint Committee selected a date of Tuesday,July 13 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at OCWD. An agenda will be mailed. d. An extended meeting date was discussed to have a"kick-off'program for the Project Development Phase. It will be a hands-on meeting to discuss procedures and issues. The Committee selected Thursday,August 12 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The location will be determined. 3. Information re Financing and Advocacy Assistance The pending bond issues were discussed by the Joint Committee. OCWD General Manager Mills reported that SAWPA has $400 million identified in funding for the Santa Ana Watershed including funding for the GWR System. The Joint Committee will further consider proposals for direct advocacy assistance for the GWR System. 5. Report of General Managers OCWD General Manager Mills reported that a briefing on supporting the bond issue would be held for city officials in the RBF offices on July 28. He also reported that he and Directors Pickler, Anthony, Swan and Mary Aileen Mathias would be visiting Washington, D.C. on behalf of the GWR System. Director Collins mentioned that the League of Cities is the same date in Monterrey. OCSD General Manager McIntyre reported that OCSD will host a Legislature's Day on Friday, July 25 from 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 am. More than 50 people will be attending. Michelle Tuchman reported that speakers will include Supervisor Silva,David Ludwin (OCSD Strategic Plan) and Blake Anderson(Chino Basin effects) and General Manager Mills(GWR System). Blake Anderson reported that on October 20, 1999 at the Huntington Beach City Hall an all day seminar"Managing Public Outrage"with Peter Sandman would be held. Cities,public information officers, water agencies, etc. are invited. 6. Directors Comments None ADJOURNMENT The Committee adjourned at 6:10 p.m. The next meeting of the Joint GWR System Committee is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., Monday,July 26, 1999,at OCWD. 3 Ne nq Dare To Bdd 7 3/ q or dr. . AGENDA REPORT IemNumbe Item17MEe v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Employer-Employee Relations Resolution GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve in concept Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations re contents of Resolution No. OCSD 99_; and 3) Return to the Board for final adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 99__with any recommended modifications. SUMMARY Last month, the FAHR Committee authorized the District's labor negotiator to meet and consult with the unions on a new Employer-Employee Relations resolution in order to update old procedural rules for the meet and confer process. Staff was to bring back the new resolution to the July Board meeting. Because staff has not been able to coordinate the schedules of the unions and management prior to July 21, staff is requesting to delay adopting the new resolution until a future Board meeting in August or September. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CECA FINDINGS N/A rv.aoaw.uiw.ywuoMe.so.,a neoe.a.rornness ame aaam a.pommeannn zaa a�,.ee Page 1 ATTACHMENTS \4aEcnbablYq.TaMpvbaBaaN beMa Re{or6"M ByN RDeMa R,R QIM-1)M Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeang Date Teae.or Da. 0,114/99 W/11/99 AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbe rtem Nembe MAMNUM M 18 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SOURCE CONTROL FEES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-10, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Amending Table B and Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Industrial Discharers, Source Control, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Class I and Class II Permittee Charges for Use: a. Verbal report of General Counsel b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-10 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-10, and pass to second reading and public hearing on August 25, 1999. SUMMARY Prior to the 1991-92 fiscal year, Source Control Permit User Fee Rates were revised each year based upon actual costs to treat BOD, SS and flow for the prior year. Between 1991-92 and 1998-99 the rates were unchanged. Last year the rate calculation methodology for general user fees and for Source Control Permit User Fees were both revised and brought into alignment. General user fees, those collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill, were adopted for 1999-2000 at the June Board meeting. This action revises the rates for Class I and Class II Source Control Permit Users to reflect the new fees for the general user. Included in this Ordinance are other miscellaneous fees and charges. The only other ones proposed to change are the costs of Laboratory Sample Analyses. The proposed fees are based upon benchmarking results and actual costs of analyses. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approximately $6 million will be paid by Class I and Class II permittees in 1999-2000. M!wp Aganaa RawftklM B WApanm RvoftW7 J,am te.ax R—.ae a Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT v ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Class I and Class II Fees One provision of the Clean Water Act and our 1979 Revenue Program, adopted by the Board of Directors to comply with the Act, is user fees for significant industrial dischargers. These dischargers are issued Class I and Class II Permits by the Source Control Division, are sampled each quarter, and are billed based upon the actual sampled strength and quantity of their wastewater. Subsequent to the RAC process and evaluation of user fees for the Strategic Plan, the rates for Class I and Class II permittees and the rates for general users are now calculated in a similar manner. The current year budget and the actual prior year treatment quantities are used to develop unit costs. The proposed rates and current rates are shown in the table below. Applying these rates to the typical residential discharge results in the rates for a single-family residence that were approved at the June Board meeting. 1998-99 Rates Proposed Rates BOD as Flow Boo ss Revenue Flow per per Domestic per per per Domestic Area per MG 10009 1000# E uivalent MG 1000# 1000# Equivalent 1 271.08 223.04 213.39 96.41 382.46 234.28 222.65 110.04 2 208.07 171.19 163.79 74.00 264A5 161.81 153.77 76.00 3 212.28 174.66 167.11 75.50 264.15 161.81 153.77 76.00 5 237.59 195.48 187.03 84.60 304.12 186.29 177.04 87.50 6 222A3 182.76 174.86 79.00 278.05 170.32 161.87 80.00 7 168.70 138.81 132.80 60.00 229.39 140.52 133.54 66.00 11 224.94 185.07 177.07 80.00 312.81 191.61 182.10 90.00 13 281.17 231.34 221,34 100.00 347.66 1 212.90 202.33 100.00 Laboratory Sample Analysis Fees The OCSD Laboratory costs for analysis of wastewater samples collected from various permit holders are charged to the appropriate Revenue Area each month. This puts the costs of administering a permit in the same fund as the permit user fee revenue. When these costs are incurred as a result of an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement, or ECSA, then the permit holder is charged for the analysis. An ECSA is a mutual agreement between the District and the permittee amending the permit to H N.y.Eh�p�M�`Hv,O AWw Hey, %HXQB Nag.Rgw,a`a]Ba 19 Rom, &MM Page 2 4 require changes in pretreatment equipment or practices. The permit holder is similarly v charged for analyses during non-compliance events or investigation. The Laboratory has recalculated the costs to perform or outsource 44 sample analyses. The calculations are based upon the Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study and actual costs to the District. The unit costs are shown in Table B of the proposed Ordinance. ALTERNATIVES 1. Retain existing fee schedule. 2. Adopt a different fee schedule. 3. Adopt the same fee in each revenue area. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. OCSD99-10 GGS:lc H%,ftd 9eMalBimN Ape^Ea ReB° lBBB Ba Aaend.ReVudN1BB.Xam 18.hs R—.ee Banes Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. OCSDA 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING TABLE B AND TABLE C OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-06 RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES, SOURCE CONTROL, NON COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, AND CLASS I AND CLASS If PERMITTEE CHARGES FOR USE The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-06, established charges for source control and non compliance sampling fees and for use by Class I and Class II permittees for discharge of industrial waste and WHEREAS, the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal system facilities; the costs of owning, operating, and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and, WHEREAS, the user charges imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and, WHEREAS, the charges adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each Gass of use that is connected, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: 1071Ma 1 Section 1. Table B of Ordinance No. OCSD-06 is hereby amended to read: HEAVY METALS: Cadmuim, Chromium, $35 each Copper, Nickel, Lead, Silver, Zinc, Alumunum, Antimony, Arsenic, Gold, Molybdenum, Palladium, Platinum, Selenium, Thallium Mercury $78 601/602 $152 604 $223 606 $254 608 $523 610 $73 612 $20D 624 $355 625 $661 Ammonia— Nitrogen $21 Biochemical Oxygen Demand $44 BOD and Suspended Solids $67 Chemical Oxygen Demand $44 Conductivity $15 Cyanide amenable & total $70 Dissolved Mineral Solids $15 Gamma Radiation $115 Gross alpha and beta radiation $50 Tritium Radiation $50 Grease & Oil by hexane $74 Grease & Oil by Mineral Partition $74 Total Organic Ni en $48 PH $8 Fluoride $51 Suspended Solids—total $23 Suspended Solids—total &volatile $44 Dissolved Solids—total $14 Suedes-total $29 107134 v1 2 Section 2. Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06 is hereby amended to read: Proposed Rates Revenue +Flow per BOD ;:per SS per Domestic Area CMG -' 1000# 1000q E uivalenf 1 382.46 234.28 222.65 110.04 2 264.15 161.81 153.77 76.00 3 264.15 161.81 153.77 76.00 5 304.12 186.29 177.04 87.50 6 278.05 170.32 161.87 80,00 7 229.39 140.52 133.54 66.00 11 1312.81 191.61 182.10 90.00 13 347.56 212.90 202.33 100.00 Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Section 4. Effective Date. The fees and charges set forth herein shall become effective thirty (30) days following adoption and shall be the basis for all invoices or charges imposed by the District after the effective date. Section 5. Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held August 25, 1999. Chair, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 107134 v1 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Neetlng Date Tnaa.mar' AGENDA REPORT Ioen Numbe Iem Numbe 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-04: a. Receive and file Staff Report dated June 16, 1999 b. Receive and file General Counsel's memorandum dated July 14, 1999 c. Verbal report of General Counsel d. Verbal report of Staff e. Receive and file written comments, if any f. Open hearing g. Close hearing h. Discussion by Board i. Recommended actions 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-04, by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-09. SUMMARY At the June meeting, the Directors introduced Ordinance No. OCSD-09 and established July 21, 1999 as the date for the second reading. If adopted, the Ordinance will become effective September 1, 1999. Staff and General Counsel have previously reported that a notice was mailed to the owner of record of each vacant property within our service area, as identified at the Orange County Assessor's Office. The notice indicated that fees would be changing for all types of connections, and would be increasing for most industrial/commercial categories and for five-bedroom single-family residences. The notice also advised the property owner of tonight's hearing and also provided a means for written, phoned or e-mailed responses in the event a property owner did not wish to attend the hearing. The correspondence received can be summarized as: n rn.aesw^a+me Pena.a.om.uwea..e•e•ma newbmeanem.eea a..e.a. ermve Page 1 • E-mail: 3 from unaffected properties • Letters: 13 from unaffected properties 11 stating the property was sold 4 correcting the mailing address 3 reporting previous development 3 notifying of undeveloped status 1 opposed to the new structure (attached) The Directors have held a public participation program (Rate Advisory Committee), heard the report from that committee, held Saturday workshops, heard numerous staff presentations, and received and fled the consultant report "Determination of Financial Rates and Charges." The proposed fee structure is fair, equitable and based upon relative potential sewerage system demands. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to staff report dated June 16, 1999. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report dated June 16, 1999 2. General Counsel's memorandum dated July 14, 1999 3. Ordinance OCSD-09 4. Letter from TIK, Inc. 5. Letter from County of Orange, Public Facilities & Resources Department H:Np Rep,N11M 6­ Ape"tle Reem•W M.N 1B Ox R. Page 2 June 16,1999 STAFF REPORT Capacity Facilities Capacity Charges (Connection Fees) Capital facilities capacity charges, or connection fees for short, have been one-time fees collected in order to cover the costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve the property. Today, connection fees are collected for the District by member cities and sanitary districts when building permits are issued. These fees were revisited as a part of the Rate Advisory Committee's (RAC)work for the Strategic Plan. The RAC did not develop a specific connection fee calculation method, but did give staff guidelines in several areas: • The existing calculation method should be changed. • There should be different residential fees to reflect different impacts. • The economic and social benefits of commercial/industrial development should be considered. • Collection methods besides "one-time, up-front" should be considered. • Costs of facilities related to wet-weather flows should be shared on the basis of wet- weather flow increases. • New users should pay for new capacity. Subsequent to the RAC process, staff and the Strategic Plan consultants worked to develop a capital facilities capacity charge program that satisfied the RAC concerns, was fair to existing and future users, reflected differing demands on the sewerage system and satisfied the District's need for future funds. A workshop was held for all Directors, the FAHR Committee considered several alternatives and the Board reviewed, and reached consensus on, the FAHR Committee proposal in order to issue a "Proposition 218 Notice". Existing Program The existing method of calculation was developed as a part of the 1989 Master Plan, also called the 2020 VISION Master Plan. Future users are charged their share of all facilities, both existing and future, that will be in place in 2020 as if all facilities and all users came into the system on that date. This calculation method is sometimes called the "capital investment equalization method". If the value of all the facilities is projected to be $2,360,000,000, and the total number of users is projected to be 1,000,000, then the connection fee is $2,360. One of the most significant assumptions in 1989 was that the non-residential use factor per 1,000 square feet of building is 20% of single-family residential use. This results in a current non-residential connection fee of$472 ($2,350 x 20%) per 1,000 square feet in this example. This calculation method can also be described as "all users, past, present and future, pay the same." Connection Fee Altematives Page 2 of 7 June 16, 1999 RAC Program The RAC recommended that capital costs be categorized and that different user types pay for different categories of costs. Cost categories were developed for existing net assets, additional dry weather capacity, additional wet weather capacity, improved treatment and rehabilitation/reconstruction. The following table explains the allocation of these cost categories to user groups. Cost Category Allocation of Costs • Existing Assets Less Debt • Current users have paid for support facilities, etc; all new users will also pay a share • Dry Weather Capacity • All new users will pay • Wet Weather Capacity • New residential and new non- residential users will pay based upon comparative length of sewers within each group • Improved Treatment • Current and new users will pay • Rehab/Reconstruction • Current and new users will pay By leaving the existing assets cost category out of this calculation, this allocation method can be changed to one best described as, "all users from now on pay the same," and/or as, 'future users will only pay for future capacity." Significant Changes Several things have changed since the 1989 adoption of the "2020 VISION Master Plan" that impact the calculation of connection fees. The Strategic Plan proposed a capital improvement plan through 2020 that is approximately equal to the "2020 Vision" projects, but there are 10 fewer years in the planning horizon. The planned daily flow for a single-family residence, or an equivalent dwelling unit, has been reduced, based upon experience and metering, from 399 gallons to 260 gallons. The total average daily flow into the plants at 2020 has been reduced from 399,000,000 to 352,000,000 gallons. The total number of equivalent dwelling units that are projected to be connected in 2020 has therefore increased from 1,000,000 to 1,354,000. However, the change that has the most impact on non-residential connection fees, is that the average daily flow per 1,000 square feel has been calculated at 150 gallons per day, rather than the 80 gallons per day that had been assumed historically. This change alone would result in a near doubling of the non-residential connection fee. Alternatives Several methods of implementing the RAC recommendations were evaluated by staff and reviewed by the FAHR Committee and other Directors. Connection Fee Alternatives Page 3 of 7 June16, 1999 User Fee Basis -With the intention of developing consistency between the flow and strength based user fee program and connection fees, connection fees were calculated based upon the flow, BOD and SS assumptions used to determine user fees. (BOD, biochemical oxygen demand, and SS, microscopic suspended solids, are common measurements of wastewater strength.) This method resulted in 30 separate rates per 1,000 square feet of development. Summary User Fee Basis —Fees were first computed per 1,000 sq. ft. of development as above. Those uses with reasonably close fees were then combined and consolidated. The number of different rates was reduced from 30 to 15. Average Use Basis -There are generally only two sizes of commercial laterals. They are determined principally by ease of cleaning, and they are established by building codes. These facts support a minimum number of rates because the maximum use from most developments would be approximately the same. Potential maximum use is the basis for our current connection fee structure and results in the same rate as average use. Master Plan Land Use Basis -The master plan or strategic plan process predicts future flows and future capacity requirements based upon land use. Cities and counties adopt land use plans for future developments within their spheres of influence. Each of these land uses is assigned a flow coefficient per acre. Proposed Basis Staff and consultants reviewed and reconsidered each of the alternatives in the light of the comments by the FAHR Committee, the City of Anaheim, other Directors and District staff. A proposal was developed which takes the best from the various other alternatives and retains consistency with the current calculation method. The base fee is proposed to continue to be calculated on the "capital investment equalization method." Total capital costs of 2020 will be allocated to all projected users at 2020 to calculate the base fee. Differences in non-residential use per 1,000 square feet will be accommodated in two ways: Rates will be adopted for very low uses such as warehouses and parking structures; and rates will be adopted for very high uses, such as restaurants and car washes. Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, those requiring Class I, or Class II, permits from our Source Control Division, may pay an ongoing capital charge on their quarterly invoices if their individual actual discharge exceeds the average allowed in the base connection fee. This proposal is easy for the local agencies to administer, recognizes that not all users place the same demand on the system, recognizes that the exact use of a property is often unknown when building permits are issued, acknowledges that most users have similar demands, and reduces the significant up-front charges faced by a large user. Connection Fee Alternatives Page 4 of 7 June 16, 1999 Reduced Up-Front Payments Connection fees based upon potential flow and strength can be significant for certain users. The up-front, one-time fee for a food processing plant that relocated to Orange County recently could have been $1.4 million based upon a projected ultimate flow of 150,000 gallons a day and a combined 1,700 pounds of BOD and SS. The proposal is for these Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, SIUs or Class I or Class II, Permitees, to pay a base connection fee per 1,000 square feet of building. This base fee will allow them to discharge an average quantity and strength of wastewater. For use above this average, a fee per gallon or per pound would be added to their quarterly invoice for use, which will continue to be based upon actual flow and strength. In this way, accurate impacts and uses are established as the basis for the capital facilities capacity charge, cash flow matches production for the business, up- front costs are minimized, fees stop if the business moves or quits and increased use in the future generates additional "connection fee" revenues. In order to compensate the District for the lost up-front funds and to provide for the "time value of money," an interest component will be included in the rates per gallon and pound. Tiered Residential Fees The RAC recommended that residential connection fees be tiered to reflect differing demands on the sewerage system. One of the best ways to predict sewer use is by the number of bedrooms because that correlates to the number of potential occupants. Additionally, adding a bedroom requires a building permit and would trigger additional connection fees. Consultants and staff analyzed census data and Assessor's Office data to determine the mix of bedrooms in the single-family residential (SFR) and multi- family residential (MFR) service area to determine the standard bedroom size for each, as well as the number of existing and projected units. The result of this analysis is shown below assuming that the MFR average daily flow is 70% of the SFR flow, the same assumption used in determining user fees. No. of Bedrooms SFR Ratio MFR Ratio 0 .327 1 .615 .508 2 .808 .700 3 1.000 .890 4 1.192 1.084 5 1.365 Connection Fee Alternatives Page 5 of 7 June 16, 1999 Credit for Demolished Structures For many years, the connection fee ordinance has allowed credit for structures demolished up to two years prior to issuance of new building permit. The credit is determined to be an amount equal to the current connection fee for the demolished structure. Thus, if 25 single-family homes were demolished and replaced with 75 single-family homes, the developer would only be required to purchase 50 new permits. This credit is allowed whether or not connection fees were ever paid, and regardless of the amount of connection fees actually paid. (In no event is a refund ever granted.) Recently, two separate developers have challenged the two-year period. The basic argument put forth by the lawyers for each of these developers is that the previous buildings paid for the capacity they used, either through connection fees or property taxes. Connection fees in this area, formerly District No. 2, were adopted in 1973 at $50 per 1,000 square feet. Prior to passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, each District also levied a separate property tax for capital improvements. The other view is that sewage treatment facilities are planned and constructed based upon flow trends and demands. When a building is demolished, flows decrease. After some reasonable period, planners need to be able to know that the flow decrease is ..permanent,' and that future capacity needs will be met through connection fees. The Directors considered four options and listened to a presentation from one of the affected developers and propose to modify the current policy. The proposal removes the two-year provision and provides, instead, that any new replacement building would not be required to pay any capital facility capacity charge so long as the new use was no more than the previous demand. In the case of increased demand, a fee would be charged only for the increase. Reduced Fee for Low Income or Senior Citizen Developments From time to time, the Directors have been asked to consider reducing or waiving the connection fee for various projects deemed socially desirable. Most often these are projects for senior citizens or to provide low-cost housing. It has not been uncommon for various other agencies to waive their fees for these projects. Nonetheless, the Directors have not granted these requests in the past. In the tiered residential connection fee described above, the connection fee for a one- bedroom unit would already be one-half of the standard three-bedroom single-family rate, while a studio apartment would be about one-third. The tiered residential connection fee should serve to satisfy the demand for reduced fees for these special types of developments. Governmental Use Historically, local governmental agency buildings have not been charged a connection fee. (They do pay annual user fees.) These uses include county facilities, public Connection Fee Alternatives Page 6 of 7 June 16, 1999 schools, city halls, fire stations, police stations, etc. Revenue Area 13 has been an exception in which all of these uses are charged connection fees. State and federal buildings are charged for connection fees in all Revenue Areas. The proposed Ordinance removes the exemption for local agencies. All users will now be required to pay a capital facilities capacity charge that reflects their demand upon the sewerage facilities. When a local agency is charged a connection fee, the funds are ultimately provided by the local taxpayers. Thus, the people who benefit from the service pay the fees. When a regional facility is charged a connection fee, it must raise the funds from its own service area, which could be broader than the OCSD Revenue Area affected. Charging governmental agencies removes an indirect subsidy that could now be the basis for finding the charge to be invalid as not meeting the requirements of Proposition No. 218. Recommendations Staff recommends the adoption of a new comprehensive capital facilities capacity charge ordinance which contains the following elements. 1. Base fees will be determined by type of development and are calculated per 1,000 square feet of building area for non-residential development and per unit for residential development. 2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees will be developed: low demand, average demand and high demand. The attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule shows the rates for each category and a comparison with other agencies. 3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I and Class II Penmittees)will be charged demand-based capital facilities capacity charges as a part of their on-going annual use charge billings, rather than only as a one-time up-front charge. These charges will include an interest component. The attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule shows the rates per gallon and per pound that would be charged for additional demand. 4. Residential fees will be tiered based upon number of bedrooms for SFR and MFR development. 5. Credit for demolished structures will be granted in an amount equal to the fee calculated today for the demolished structure, without regard for the time between demolition and new building permits. 6. Connection fees will continue to be charged for state and federal facilities. Connection fees will begin to be charged for city, county and regional facilities and for all school buildings. Connection Fee Alternatives Page 7 of 7 June 16, 1999 GGS:glc %Vadon\datal\wp.dta\finl21 Mcmna%FAHR\Fahr99U1ay1Cann FeeStaffReport623.doc Table 1 Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Single Family Residential 5+ Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $2.530 4 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $2,165 3 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1,820 2 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1,475 1 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1.130 Multi-Family Residential 4+ Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1,965 3 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1,620 2 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1.275 1 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $910 Studio Per MFR Unit $SW Commercial and Industrial Low Facilities Demand 1.000 sq feet $110 Average Facilities Demand 1,000 sq feet $675 High Facilities Demand 1,000 sq feet $1,600 Low Facilities Demand High Facilities Demand Churches Amusement Parks Lumber/Constr.Yards Car Washes Nurseries (plants) Coin Laundry Parking Structures Restaurants RV Parks Shopping Ctr w/Restaurant RV Storage Supermarkets Schools Truck Terminals Warehouses The base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for High Facilities Demand is established at$1,600, but shall be incrementally increased from the current rate in five steps at five intervals as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $675 Effective January 1,2000 $900 Effective July 1, 2000 $1,130 Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 Effective July 1, 2001 $1,600 G:lexcel.dlaWrin12101s9eedbkl d cepy15TRATPLMmnn fee sch 623 6/16n999 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-04 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a management report, including financial and system facilities needs of the District, and wishes to reaffirm the policy of the District of imposing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly connect to the District's system or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges or"fees" to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to conned to the District's system as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed; and, B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989", hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, identifying the required future development of District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District's service areas; and, C. That the District has undertaken, commencing in 1997, a comprehensive update and revision of the Master Plan, which revisions are scheduled for completion in the Year 2000, to thereafter be known as the "Strategic Plan", and D. That the District, in 1997, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in TLw:pi:aios :o :MW99 1 the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to conned to and gain access to the system; and E. That a final report, based upon studies and reports of District's engineering and financial advisors, and an extensive evaluation by an Advisory Committee of industrial, commercial, and residential users of the system (the "Rate Advisory Committee"), has been prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors to assist and guide it in its considerations for the adoption of this Ordinance (the "Determination of Financial Rates and Charges Report); and F. That the Report has been made available to the public and has been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of law; and, G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and, H. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal system facilities; that the costs of owning, operating, and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and, I. That the connection fees imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and, J That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and K That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: nw:ryxr 05e77:os:0e25199 2 Section 1: Definitions 1.1 "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. 1.2 "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, as provided for in Section 6 of this Ordinance, is a one-time charge, a portion of which is payable over a period of time. 1.3 "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including, but not limited to installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines and appurtenances to make the connection, that does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. 1.4 "Nondiscriminatory' means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. 1.5 "Predecessor Districts" means former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, which jointly owned and administered the property and sewerage system facilities of the District, which consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District, as a single entity, effective July 1, 1998. 1.6 "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county, city, district, school district, public authority, or any other political subdivision or public corporation of this State. Section 2: Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage Trw:plVI osan:D-s:oeiM9G 3 facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. B. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit, or provides a written waiver of this requirement to the District. There will be a Nondiscriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be issued until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. Section 4: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. 4.1 Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. 4.2 Upon application of any property seeking to connect to the Districts system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 5: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth in Table 1. rrw:ga1 osan:".0Gr25M 4 TABLE 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial 1,000 square feet Low Demand 1,000 square feet $ 110' Average Demand 1,000 square feet $ 675' High Demand 1,000 square feet $1,600'2 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910 Studio Per Unit $ 580 Section 6: Additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Industrial Users. In addition to the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, based upon each 1,000 square feet of building area for commercial — industrial use 1 Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $1,820. 2The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at$1,600, but shall be incrementally Increased from the present amount at five(5) levels, and five (5)time periods as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675 Effective January 1,2000 $ 900 Effective July 1,2000 $1,130 Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 Effective July 1,2001 $1,600 A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file In the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 'Low Demand connections are the following categories of users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches;Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards. "High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries;Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants. —All other connections are Average demand users. TLW:pi:N105077:D-6:06r25?99 5 category properties, all users that are required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit or Special Purpose Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Article 3, due to having regulated or significant discharges, shall pay a daily charge for each gallon of flow or pound of Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") or Suspended Solids ("SS") above the base use discharge maximums included in the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amounts as set forth below. The base use discharge maximums are 25,000 gallons per day, or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS. Daily Fee Flow Portion Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Portion Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Portion Pounds Per Day $0.16025 This additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, based upon flow and strength above the average allowed with the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, shall be charged to the user on its quarterly invoice for the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges (User Charge), as provided by District Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Section 7: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 8: Caoital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for the prior category of use. Section 9: Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3 and 4 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. TLw:vlxi 05477:o-S.OW25J89 6 Section 10: No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other property. Section 11 : Exceotions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations. Section 12: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 13 : Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect September 1, 1999. Section 14: Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-04 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 15 : Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two- thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, District Counsel TLW:pj:M10W7:D-0:0&8 99 7 TO: Orange County Sanitation District FROM: TIC,INC. DATE: June 23, 1999 RE: Notice of Public Hearing-Proposed Capital Facilities Capacity Charges APNS: 322-183-15,322.183-17,322-183.18,&323-193.19 Dear Sir/Madam: I ana in receipt of the above notices and on behalf of the owner,(TIC,INC.),am writing to notify you of its objection to your proposed Capital Facilities Capacity Charges as being unreasonable and unfair. In light of this position,we strongly oppose any such changes and ask you to reconsider this proposal. Sincerely, Karen J. White Executive Director TIK INC. 17451 aASTANCHURY RD. ■ SUITE 202 ■ YOR13A UNDA CAUFORNIA 92686 TELEPHONE [714152&4799 0 FAX 1714) 528-6291 1 County of Orange U Public Facilities & Resources Department <reon� John W. Sibley,Director JUL - 1 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Board of Directors P. O Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Proposed Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Gentlemen: We received the notices of public hearing regarding the above subject. We recommend that public entities such as the Orange County Flood Control District and other county special districts and cities be exempted from paying connection fees. If you have questions regarding this subject, please contact me at (714) 834-3719 or Sara Bevan at (714)834-3181. Very truly yours, Z�w- Kenneth R. Smith Deputy Director/Chief Engineer RSB:W/ph171/99224_0610990C Sanitation LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 300 N. FLOWER ST P.O.BOX 4048 (714)834-4463 SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA.CA 92702-4048 FAX#834-7411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeebngDae roee.ur .ar AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number zo Orange county Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: Public Hearing of Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1999 Strategic Plan GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions relative to the public review of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the 1999 Strategic Plan: a) Verbal report of Staff b) Verbal report of General Counsel c) Receive and file written comments, if any d) Open hearing e) Close hearing f) Recommended action: 1. Direct Staff to include responses to the written and verbal comments received in the Final Program EIR, which is scheduled to be certified at the October 27, 1999 Regular Board Meeting. SUMMARY At the June 23, 1999 Board meeting, the Board of Directors authorized staff to release the Strategic Plan Draft Program EIR for public circulation. The public review period was established as June 29 through August 16, 1999, with a public hearing established for 8:00 p.m. on July 22, 1999. The Draft Program EIR provides the public with complete disclosure of the environmental effects from the proposed adoption of the 1999 Strategic Plan. The Draft Program EIR was mailed on June 29 to responsible agencies, organizations, and all individuals that expressed an interest in the project. Approximately 165 Draft Program EIR's, 105 Executive Summaries, and 40 Notice of Availability of the Draft Program EIR were mailed. Additionally, the public hearing was advertised in both the Los Angeles Times Orange County Edition, and the Orange County Register. At the public hearing, the Director of Engineering will present an overview of the Strategic Plan. Environmental Science Associates, our environmental consultant, will discuss the EIR and the CEOA process. All comments received at the public hearing will be recorded and addressed in the Final EIR, along with written comments received during the review period. The Final EIR is scheduled for certification by the Board of Directors in October 1999. N 1wp.Ne W BLOBS 6 COMPAGTSVSTMT PLpNJd W 1pgE IRVgMs Npwl P W lk X vYq Cd w...a- Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (1999-00 CORF Budget, Special Projects, J404) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 1997, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the 1999 Strategic Plan was circulated for public review. Staff contacted individual public agencies throughout Orange County by letter to inform them of the project. Forty written comments were received from several agencies expressing concerns. During the review period, staff also conducted two scoping sessions to accept verbal comments on the NOP. Three verbal comments were received at the scoping sessions. All verbal and written comments received were considered during the development of the Administrative Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). On June 17, 1999, the Administrative Draft Program EIR was presented to the Planning and Rate Advisory Committees (PAC 2), and to the Board of Directors on June 19, 1999. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS Filed Notice of Preparation on October 23,1997. Two scoping sessions held on November 13, 1997. On June 23, 1999, the Board of Directors approved the Draft Program EIR for public circulation. The public review period was established as June 29, 1999 through August 16, 1999. ATTACHMENTS None. JRH:AA:jo Hw maw 08S s COW CrsvS TPA Q4o IRA 9 as Pawn P„me HOWIN ear R—„ W" Page 2 rSTATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on i.) U , 19.!L?was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on i¢z 19/1� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /f day of Penny M. Kyle, Secr ry Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District — . H:%W P.DTAIADMJN=kF0RM5\F27A