The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-06-23 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ��. June 17, 1999 NOTICE OF MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS ""°"•' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (7141982-2411 m.111n4.44reta: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. Pa Box 8127 Po .tein Vet.Y.CA 92728.8127 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue 10844 Ellis Avenue Po MatnValley.CA Fountain Valley, California 92708 9270E 701E The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Member • L C1t1na Board Secret ry Bras And area Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Buena Perk cypress FpunWm Vahs, Pollerrodlhdn JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Geroen Gyve SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, June 21, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Hunungton Beech Irvine Le Hebre COMBINED STEERING COMMITTEE AND L.Pakno AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, June 23, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Los Alemlms Newport Beech a-.ng. LEGISLATORS' DAY - Friday, June 25, 1999, at 8:30 a.m. Plecenue Sena And Beet Beach PLANNING, DESIGN AND Anton CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, July 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Tustin ✓Ile Perk lcrbe Linda OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND Conn" or Oren.. TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND Sanitary Districts HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Costa Mese M,d .'Cie, COMBINED STEERING COMMITTEE AND water Olasrl... AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, July 21, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. Irvne Hnnr" BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - Wednesday, July 21, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. -To Protect Me Pubhc Health and the Enw onment through Excellence,n Wastewater Spoems- a a mm BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting July 'July 21, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November 'November 17, 1999 December 'December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 April April 26, 2000 May May 24, 2000 June June 28, 2000 July July 26, 2000 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JUNE 23, 1999 — 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. a. Nominations and election of Chair(effective July 1, 1999) b. Nominations and election of Vice Chair(effective July 1, 1999) 6. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). O6/23199 Page 2 7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel S. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on May 26, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vole, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 05/15/99 05/31/99 Totals $3,685,956.85 $4,164,668.05 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, slate their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 10. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-07, selecting the annual change in California per Capital Personal Income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing $50,026,000 as the annual GANN Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1999-00 for the Orange County Sanitation District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. 11. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-08, Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures made In advance for 1999-00 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Term Financing. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 12. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 06/23/99 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re June 23, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 26, 1999 to be filed. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re May 27, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on May 27, 1999 to be filed. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re June 2, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 2, 1999 to be filed. C. Authorize the General Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley for provision of vehicle fueling services. d. Approve Phase 3 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc. for$218,500 for the period July 1999 to February 2000. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re June 3, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES - NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 3, 1999 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35.3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of $326,366 and 328 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to O6123/99 Page 4 $14,027,424; (2)Approve a budget amendment of$1,112,258 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of$21.118,358; (3)Accept Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. d. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, with Mike Pdich & Sons authorizing an addition of$115,000 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,392,796. e. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, providing for additional construction support services in the amount of$37,502, for a total amount not to exceed $375,056. f. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Converse Consultants, Law/Crandall, and Ninyo & Moore, providing for geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment and materials testing services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-182, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extension ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. g. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with DGA Consultants, Inc., Bush &Associates, Inc., and Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc., providing for surveying services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-183, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant,with provisions for one one-year extension ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. h. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers; Krieger& Stewart, Inc.; Lee & Ro, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc.; and Tran Consulting Engineers, for professional engineering services related to (small projects)for Facilities Engineering Consulting Services for an amount not to exceed $160,000 each, for a total of$800,000. O6123/99 Page 5 17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re June 9, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chairwill order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 9, 1999 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 1999. d. Receive and file 1999/00 Strategic Goals Workplans. e. Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period June 25, 1999 to May 15, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $890,250. f. 1) Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-186) to the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agencv • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners- Engineering Personnel • Talk Systems - IT Personnel • Lab Support- Laboratory personnel 2) Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firms, as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-09, Approving a Report on Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Establishing the Amount of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for All Revenue Areas for Fiscal Year 1999-00; and Directing the County Auditor to Add Such Charges to the 1999-00 Secured Tax Roll. O6/23/99 Page 6 "' h. 1) Receive and file letter dated May 12, 1999 from Legacy Partners, requesting a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels paid in December 1998 and January 1999, and a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for two parcels to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates, in the amount of$183,896.00; 2) Deny request for partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels/permits paid in December 1998 and January 1999; and, 3)Approve request to grant fee reduction for two parcels/permits to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates. i. Approve proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 1999-00, as follows (Final copies will be available upon approval.): Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $44,000,000 Worker's Compensation Self-Insurance 330.000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 792,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 68,771,000 Collection System Operating 9,356,500 Collection System Capital Improvement 23,629,000 Debt/COP Service 41,690,000 j. 1)Approve in concept Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations re contents of Resolution No. OCSD 99-_; and, 3) Return to the Board for final adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 99-— with any recommended modifications at the regular meeting of July 21, 1999. 18. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re June 16, 1999 and June 22, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 25, 1999 to be filed. C. 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for engineering services for the Project Development phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $4,810,300, with Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) and Orange County Water District(OCWD) having equal shares in the amount of$2,405,150; 2) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Separation Processes, Inc., for engineering services in connection with Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $403,280, with the OCSD and OCWD having equal shares in the amount of$201,640; and, 3)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carl R. Nelson for professional services 06/23/99 Page 7 in connection with Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $53,000, with OCSD and OCWD having equal shares in the amount of$26,500. 19. 1)Authorize circulation of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan for public comment in compliance with CEOA requirements; 2)Authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; 3) Fix July 21, 1999 at 7:00 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; and, 4) Establish August 16, 1999 as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan. 20. 1) Approve plans and specifications for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to Matthew and Stewart Co., Inc. for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, for an amount not to exceed $129,796. 21. (1) Approve plans and specifications and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, pursuant to bid tabulation, in an amount to be determined at the time of award. 22. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges: a. Receive and File Staff Report b. Verbal report of General Counsel C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-09 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-09, and pass to second reading and public hearing on July 21, 1999. 23. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-10, Temporarily Suspending the Provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-04 re Capital Facilities Connection Charges 24. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-11, Directing the County Tax Collector to Include Sanitary Sewer Service Charges on the 1999-00 Property Tax Bills and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-36. O6/23/99 Page 8 25. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re David Deese v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 786591 (Government Code Section 54956.9. 2. Confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with General Counsel re Louis Sangernano v. County Sanitation Districts, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 26. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 27. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 28. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 29. Adjournments O6/23/99 Page 9 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 \YaC WaWlWm.Ela`age M,Bwrd AgerMaMiM Bwrd AgerMas`0629g �I1tC� o�� 6/a3/yy , CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 3311 Michelson Drive Irvine, California 92612 (949) 553.1220 (949) 553.1154 VIA FACSIMILE June 23, 1999 Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, a Sanitation District Board of Directors, "ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT' P.0 Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Re: Park Place Property Dear Sirs and Madams: As you know, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Witte "Orange County Sanitation District" ('the District") bargained with Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership ("CWDLP'l for land on which to build a pump station. CWDLP dedicated such land based on a promise by the District that CWDLP would pay only the following on its parcels: "Sewer connection fees or capital facilities charges imposed on all users of the District's public wastewater facilities except for any such capital facilities charges or special connection fees associated with construction of the Pump Facility...." Based on that Dedication Agreement("Agreement"), CWDLP dedicated land worth more than $800,000 to the District, on which the District constructed a pump station. As the District has stated through the writings of its counsel, the District cannot now determine the offset on connection fees to which CWDLP is entitled under the parties'Agreement("we cannot identify where the individual dollars were spent"), and therefore refuses any offset ("the District will not consider any refund or rebate of ... fees"). For good measure, the District also has assigned the Agreement 4 had breached to a new entity, over CWDLP's objection and in plain violation of the non-assignment clause of the Agreement. Those claims are the subject of a separate letter of July 21, 1999. and CWDLP's Administrative Claim. I JIJ4G].LiiO .J•MI'„ „v..- . . .., .rr, .v I r , .. M,M' � ", �"'�•IV,Ic 1A,.balY,rilM•N�/•.q Wight„�I�b.wr,W•�.evA. \/e,q,wsr,�.,r.q�MMti�/ Boards of Directors June 23, 1999 Page 2 Today I write concerning a more startling revelation, pertinent to that Administrative Claim. In i addition to the foregoing, yesterday we discovered that in 1975, fifteen years prior to entering into the Agreement with CWDLP, the District signed a contract with Fluor Engineers & Constructors, Inc., whereby the District received payment in full, and on a per acre basis, of any and all connection fees which otherwise might be levied against those some parcels. (A copy of that agreement obtained from the District is attached as Exhibit A.) In short, through misrepresentation the District not only has demanded double Payment of connection fees on r the same parcels, the District further has extracted a dedication of land from CWDLP based on r waiver of connection fees which were not, and never could come, due. . .-. --- - In a meeting this morning with District representatives, the District made a series of explanations for its conduct. We have heard them before. Not only are they directly contrary to positions the District has taken in the past,they make absolutely no sense. In 1975, and before anything was built, the District charged and a third-party paid $58,000 as payment-in-full for all future connection fees on the 105 acres at issue. This was a common practice by the District The District's contract for$58,000 in fees permitted a build-out on these 105 acres of up to 20 million square feet. The total build-out for the Park Place project is less than 4 million square feet Accordingly, there is nothing "unfair"about requiring the District to honor its contract. It is, however, unfair for the District to demand double payment of those fees, and unfair for the District to extract a dedication of land from one of its ratepayers based on a promise to waive fees already paid. The District next explains that, since the Agreement discusses a waiver of "connection fees" which the District now admits it cannot calculate and therefore will not refund, the District now will assert that in reality the deal was that the District would waive "excess capacity'charges. Again,the District's dissembling does not withstand scrutiny, FirsL the Agreement does not speak to"excess capacity" charges. Its just not there. Second, the assertion that CWDLP gave up land worth in excess of$800,000 for waiver of"excess capacity" charges makes no sense. Simply, CWDLP could hot be charged for excess capacity under the Ordinance applicable when these fees were paid. When built out in its entirety, Park Place will use at a maximum less than 400,000 gallons per day,which is well below the minimum threshold required by the District Ordinance before excess capacity charges may be assessed. Even under the current Ordinance, excess capacity charges — which District staff Informs us have never been assessed against anyone — may be assessed only against a user having a demand extraordinary to its use category. There is absolutely no evidence of such excess use at Park Place. Third, as the District acknowledged in writing during negotiation of the Agreement, the District's existing pumping station already was over-taxed by existing demands and had to be replaced, and the new Pump Facility would be "a public facility designed to serve thousands of people throughout the public sector, and is simply not an item existing for sole convenience [sic) of the Developer." Why then would CWDLP be charged extra (on top of the value of the Boards of Directors June 23, 1999 Page 3 land it dedicated) for replacing a pump already over-taxed by existing uses, with a new pump designed to serve the entire public? It wouldn't, and wasnkr In short, the Distriots "excess rapacity"charge explanations are belied by the language of the Agreement and i common sense. The District next explains that,though the Agreement discusses a waiver of"connection fees," its also refers to "capital facilities charges" attributable to the pump station which were not previously paid for by Fluor. Therefore, at least part of the consideration promised to CWDLP for the Iarld was real. . Several problems arise. First that does not change the fact that part of the consideration offered by the District was not real. Second, it does not change the fact that the District has never given even the "real". consideration promised — a discount for "capital facilities charges" — and now states that it never will. Third, during negotiation of the Agreement the District's counsel represented in w7tt6rg that "sewer connection charge" and "capital facilities charge" as used in the Agreement are synonymous. Now that the Agreement is signed, the District cannot change its position in its search for"real" consideration for CWDLP's land. The Board's counsel presumably has advised you that CWDLP has through at least July 2, 1999 to amend its Administrative Claim pursuant to California Government Code Sections 910.6 and 911.2. Absent agreement to the following conditions on or before July 1, 1999. CWDLP will be forced to pursue its legal remedies. We urge you to assess candidly the District's exposure in this matter, and accept the following proposal: (1) Agreement in principle: (a) District returns all connection fees paid by CWDLP, its tenants or other property owners on the Development and Adjacent Parcels, plus interest thereon; (b) District pays CWDLP all attorneys'fees incurred in negotiating, drafting, and thereafter communicating with the District concerning the Agreement, in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00; Rather, as the District stated prior to negotiation of the Agreement, the District spread this cost as it does all capital improvement costs. Staff Report,August 28, 1989 (60% increase"to upgrade the MacArthur Boulevard and Michelson Drive Pump Stations to bring their capacities to their respective Master Plan peak flow requirements.") ii II ' i JL!\.W.liii s 4��u uaur,.r M...•. �� rI Boards of Directors June 23, 1999 Page 4 (c) District removes the Pump Station from the Dedication Parcel and returns Dedication Parcel to CWDLP in a state suitable for construction as determined by CWDLP, on or before April 1, 2000, and pays all costs associated therewith; i (d) District remains responsible for any hazardous materials released into or from the Dedication Parcel between the date of the Dedication Agreement and April 1, 2000 (or such earlier tima_as_District delivers the Dedication - ------ Parcel to CMLF5'in the condition described in paragraph (c)); I (e) District causes sewer service for the Development and Adjacent Parcels to be transferred to Irvine Ranch Water District ("IRWD"), including installation of a site sanitary sewer line to connect to the relocated pump station, at no cost to CWDLP; (f) District credits the Development and Adjacent Parcels with all future processing capacity required for treatment of sewage from the Development I and Adjacent Parcel, and obtains an agreement with IRWD that IRWD will not charge any fee or charge for future processing capacity required for treatment of sewage from the Development and Adjacent Parcel; (g) There will be no disruption of sewerservice to the Development and Adjacent Parcels; (h) District indemnifies CWDLP for any claims arising from Districts performance under this Agreement and (2) The District will sign the Amendment No. 5 to Tolling Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B to permit the parties adequate time to memorialize the foregoing agreement in principle, r� u I ; I '. • ri Boards of Directors June 23, 1999 Page 5 These terns represent a fraction of the compensatory relief to which CWDLP would be entitled were it to file a breach of contract claim only against the District. We look forward to your prompt and considered response. Sincerely, CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, - a Maryland limited partnership-- - " - - - - By: CROW IRVINE #2 a California limited partnership, its general partner By: CROW IRVINE # MITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited artnership, its general p er By: Willia Jr. Managing a eral Partner Enclosure cc: Penny Kyle, Secretary-County Sanhation District No. 7 of Orange County, Cal'rfomia, a Sanitation District, and Secretary, "Orange County Sanitation District" I i '•6661 '6 RUM HTFLOu1 Pug#DW&P OPP Plm.PmPu2M '6661 '6 AMQIRad P 2WP MPaUP ug Vn Wmm&V smIP.1 m Z-ON wwuLp-a+V 0 M=m Mrld 2W VVMMIM N's '6661 '6 Amm(ad ftPuf�W POV R'UOAP MP Pm BuIPu=m '6661 'EZ AM i.Pa Mp aepaaW IM Rl?b Y®nroatBV�,U01 m 1. 'ox Icampa=V ue p2MMO a sapred mP-SVSZL & Pug:panmR amp v ualm s,d'Tamo VM '6661 '£Z AMMt W mad m ua PON So-aSW 'ON aMWff!PIo ID uopaoPS s aSW %amnQglP wqm km ac mvp ou:4wax 11m asDo Pas '6o-am 'ax=maq to P wndM R.aM 8032VORM aap>o Am aig 07 6661 'EZ Aagt 8mpglam pug A*LOM a&gR PVwA%d'1aMD IM PPNOld=a u m=`S66T '4i mgam0 amM.$a 1 8V ft.m.amma v am R=m*dlm wv-u i y+gR G"qmd oRi'sva-aalm •,sapmd nP. sg m pacpx dpmwipo .,,a'IQA6a.n in pumjm �a P=M.q PmRjna g 'dIInxRuvvd CULM IN3MOMAIM aoldUWm-mM _ CKV 'am. n of paw,Tal g '.LJITLLSIa xOLLtlITxVS�L.LN110�3DxVH0 :=w*q Tn Ag`666i mmf.W&P pIEZ m w4oWa a9 a tWm Pm PUB 2PBUZ s< `INDMIEoV OWMI o f s 'ox umaN-s1v smi i i I _ :pn,i w papnams 6gara4 m 6661 "Z VMW Pn 666i `!!ga� (0' l '6 A+gad '6661 'SZ AMmf no pap==vg '8661 'N p4maO paisP 4?maa*V OMP-L umfoo i►473n t nnaaaS T :tAU" se aadte dTUMO Pno QSJO mamaa +�!RoZ flt S 'nN IN+mpaamy snP m pou�ey000 siwana�Ss Pne Raaaaew eta aqc jo uom=pp=n! 033 c��I MOt1 •sm?ts4n9an 4W poa2 Pgn==w;mops of Wt9P 2&4R4G=uqv Papnaoa ajg of,tIQAAD m;ama m=M"-Ady Bmvl ov Pom of autap wand age wnmj,,, Pm'666I `Z AM am;aq m oo mu,tom Plnom mnga a�snemlmps 24c 0 7 imngNams us gins 8quq of dTQA�m;ama aqi Sy 3Fle1 Poe�a3JO nP W IFmp 209=ggmps wl 'LZ Apr sic a xangmnn m<lm om ptaom 4ocgm=2pce2 Pm Wq IsooR.lmjc)p meal ssq naw svavlam Pm :ciwOnarBes,p paE Namdn .p xpgi anlosu of uoJP w m VIM Poo?of 8m;agm WN MR sawed aqa `S iM `666T '6 aunt Vmpgm Pm g9nmg7 aisP Pm 2mpm4= `6W 't2 trimnso amp anima w tprM I 7a2m23ffiy mpl. In VON m agnmw m<Pamm=mqx.,aqi `SvamRM `666[ '9Z c R=h Pa;pn =Pas'*am-W piss '6661 b � 4amR3n alep aka vs 4t!"s i Ywacraray daRlaS of "ON imi v=w us pmm= tz=. .,am ` vaxmlm NFMIF��awt1Y`�:M'►./Mron_�4 va.v.n�w.11 NRas.Mv.•{ waM1l[4M11i /1 Nn Wn , i.,,1M � • M1 _w„ wiryp.. �_..o..•,a .er,ilt ��wVuunru:Hr."►r�wNnPw+..metwn..wcn+eualwuY,q�wu,�wnw w,#a^gy..�� "CWDLP ShaIl 1uVe through and iaciudigg July 31, 1999, to file any action OCSD'a adaglion�fbullaapce No. OCS"5, an4 OCSD WM make no clsim m any action challeogrpg OCSD's adoption of nnlinancc No. OCSD-43 filed on Or Prior to July 31, 1999,that CWDLp s action is time barred,^ 2: Section z of that Sartain To113ag A�ae dated October 14, 199k as emended Jappary 23, 1999,Fehraary 9, 1999,March 4. 1999 and March 24, IM.is hereby amended to read: 'CWDLP Shan hMftGRhand=WAing July 31. 19"to file any action challraging OCSD'S denial Of any poltical of CWDLP's Administrative Claim dated 7nly 21, 1998, and OCSD will make no clautr in any CWDLP acting r$apcng,ag OCSD's denial of CVVDIX S Admtnishafiye Claim mat such action is time booed," SOc6op 3: CWDLP Shall have tbm4b and mela&9 JoIY 31, 1999,to file an am=dmmt to CWDLP's AdminiSaffiive 0aim dalad-T*21, 199ti, and OCSD wg,make no claim that the amendment to CVi'DLP'S A dtmmsttative Claim is time barred, Secti�4: All other traps and pmvmnom of that cmlin TCQmg AOi m datal October 14, 1998 Sha11 recown in fl farce and effemt I i I I i i met RUGL 14 1 1 • PNMK in it •ail• I I •Iw ' •'a++�J.f•4��SI*11a�}S4 'IZadQ♦'/p{�{y'wY}^•Y4Cj SV "'4 wmmu M. nW.tad P R{t �dcgsa�id du P=Wrr Pu['m➢'I8'JHSUHPLLdW auBmd LN�Nd018ASQ dOUELLPIIdA AAOU;7 6661 ;per d3macam i SMIOFLL `MOd OS SV QHAOVUV doparog auQj �H 13MSM NOUV'LINVS.� J�TNHO 6661 paleQ ++�fxt 7as se saymd�4+io 3t�9 UD m/PM Aq pazn,2= =o4n4MmmIVSINLofS'oiQMMP=VePq'gp gyHNiTM(� .rr.r.urOls+a4.rrawn�s..+.v iswMrlsJaw,.np..omn�.+.jai ir.�u,n. . ._ v..Mly.. lea California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Wlnsto ie rnet kax Intent Address: httpa/w sw b.ce.gov/-,wgeb8 n Cray Davis SecretaryJw 3737 Mein Street,Suite 500,Riverside,California 92601.3339 T �1 Govemm Emimantental Phone(909)782.4130•FAX(909)781-6288 Protection � L-$TCurO June 22, 1999 ta Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708-8127 ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT NO. 99-58 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Enclosed is a certified copy of Complaint No. 99-58, assessing administrative civil liability of$50,000 regarding the July 21, 1998, discharge of sewage to Newport Bay as a consequence of a construction accident. OCSD may waive its right to a public hearing in this matter. If you choose to waive a hearing, please sign the enclosed waiver form and submit it to this office prior to August 6, 1999 with a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board for the proposed civil liability amount not suspended ($10,000). The remainder of the liability ($40,000) is suspended, contingent upon OSCD's timely and satisfactory completion of one or more supplemental environmental projects (see paragraph 9 of the complaint). If you choose not to waive your right to a hearing, a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date. If you or your staff have any questions, please contact me at 9091782-3234, Mark Adelson, chief of the board's Surveillance and Enforcement Section, at 909f782-3234, or Ted Cobb, the Board's staff counsel, at 916/657-0406. Sincerely, -r�-r Gerard J. Thibeault Executive Officer Enclosure: Complaint No. 99-58 Cc: Regional Board SWRCB Office of the Chief Counsel—Ted Cobb California Environmental Protection Agency 0 Reryt:kd Paper 9 Donald F. McIntyre June 22, 1999 Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 2 Cc., continued: SWRCB Compliance and Enforcement Unit Orange Co. Health Care Agency—Larry Honeybourne Southern California Gas Co., Santa Ana —Christopher Roady J.L. Stanton Construction Co., Whittier— Craig Fantozzi Moffatt& Nichol, Ontario— Michael Kramen MK Centennial, Irvine— David Wandering Gail Pickard Mga/acictrans.doetmdata/pch@arches California Environmental Protection Agency 0 R,,,W Paper California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region IN THE MATTER OF: Orange County Sanitation District ) Complaint No. 99-58 10844 Ellis Avenue ) for P.O. Box 8127 ) Administrative Civil Liability Fountain Valley, California ) 92708-8127 ) YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE THAT: 1. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is alleged to have violated provisions of law for which the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (hereinafter Board) may impose administrative civil liability pursuant to California Water Code Section 13385. 2. A hearing concerning this complaint will be held before the Board within 60 days of the date of issuance of this complaint, unless OCSD waives its right to a hearing. Waiver procedures are specked in Paragraph 10 of this complaint. If the hearing on this matter is not waived, the hearing will be held during the Board's regular meeting on August 20, 1999. OCSD or its representative will have the opportunity to appear and be heard and to contest the allegations in this complaint and the imposition of civil liability by the Board. 3. If the August 20, 1999 hearing on this matter is held, the Board will consider whether to affirm, reject, or modify the proposed administrative civil liability or whether to refer the matter to the Attorney General for recovery of judicial civil liability. 4. OCSD is alleged to have violated California Water Code Section 13376 by allowing or causing waste to be discharged to water of the state and of the United States without having filed a report of waste discharge and without having obtained waste discharge requirements from the Board for the discharge. 5. This complaint is based on the following facts: A.) A reinforced concrete box culvert was to be constructed near the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. Numerous underground utilities, including a 24" diameter pressurized sewage main ("force main") operated by OCSD, are located in the area of the construction. 4 Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 2 B.) In the course of relocating underground utilities that would interfere with the construction of the box culvert, on July 21, 1998, OCSD's force main was damaged by a drilling contractor, causing the release and spill of approximately 122,000 gallons of sewage. C.) An estimated 20,000 gallons of sewage were recovered, and an estimated 102,000 gallons of sewage entered Newport Bay, to the east of the Newport Boulevard bridge over the channel leading to Balboa Coves. D.) As result of the sewage spill, Orange County Health Care Agency issued a precautionary beach closure for all beaches within the western half of Newport Bay from July 21 through July 26, 1998. 6. The discharge occurred from sewage collection facilities owned and operated by OCSD. Under Section 13385(a), OCSD is strictly liable for unauthorized discharge of wastes from this collection system. Pursuant to Section 13385(c), the Board can administratively assess civil liability in an amount not to exceed the sum of the following: A.) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each day in which the violation occurs: and, B.) Where there is a discharge, any portion which is not susceptible to clean up or is not cleaned up, and the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons, an additional liability not to exceed ten dollars ($10) times the number of gallons by which the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons. 7. The maximum Section 13385(c) liability for the violation cited is $1,020,000. 8. Section 13385 (e) specifies factors that the Board shall consider in establishing the amount of civil liability. After consideration of these factors, the Executive Officer proposes civil liability be imposed on OCSD in the amount of$50,000 for the violation cited above. 9. The Executive Officer proposes that up to $40,000 of this proposed civil liability be suspended contingent on performance of a supplemental environmental project(s) acceptable to the Executive Officer. As a supplemental environmental project, OCSD proposes to connect to its sewage collection and treatment facilities the Back Bay drain, which is tributary to Newport Dunes Resort, in Upper Newport Bay. (Control of the input to the Bay from this drain (such as by sewer connection) was identified by Regional Board staff as a high priority for implementation of the coliform TMDL.) In the event that$40,000 is not required to complete this connection, OCSD proposes to conduct additional studies that will support ongoing efforts 1 _ Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 3 1 to develop a toxics TMDL for Newport Bay and that, with the sewer connection, will total a $40,000 commitment. 10. OCSD may waive its right to a hearing in this matter. If OCSD waives its right to a hearing, sign the waiver, which is page 4 of this Complaint, and return it, together with a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of$10,000 (the proposed civil liability not suspended). Send the check and signed waiver to: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 11. If the supplemental environmental project(s) identified in paragraph 9, above, is not timely completed to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer, the $40,000 suspended liability shall become immediately due and payable. If you have any questions concerning this complaint, contact the undersigned at 909/782-3284, Mark Adelson at 9091782-3234, or Ted Cobb, the Board's staff counsel, at 916/657-0406. Date Garet". Thibeault Executive Officer 1 Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 4 I California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region IN THE MATTER OF: Orange County Sanitation District ) Complaint No. 99-58 10844 Ellis Avenue ) for P.O. Box 8127 ) Administrative Civil Liability Fountain Valley, California ) 92708-8127 ) Waiver of Hearing Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) agrees to waive its right to a hearing before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with regard to the violation alleged in Complaint No. 99-58. OCSD has enclosed a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of$10,000 in partial settlement of the Complaint. OCSD also commits to the timely completion of one or more supplemental environmental projects that are acceptable to the Regional Board's Executive Officer and that individually or collectively represent a commitment of$40,000. Further, OCSD acknowledges that if the supplemental environmental project(s) is not timely completed to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer, the $40,000 suspended liability shall become immediately due and payable. Finally, OCSD understands that it is giving up its right to be heard and to argue against the allegations made in the Complaint, and against the imposition of, and amount of, civil liability. Date for Orange County Sanitation District RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ♦eegTARIAS a IRCLBBIryB 1ROICSS'ONA' CO.00RLTI... BY NNTOry BOOLL VPRO. BNTL 1R.. w COSTA MESA. CALIrORN1A 02826-IS08 DIRECT • A TO: P. O. IBBO R .. COSTA MESA. CALIrORNIA OYBLB-ISBO TCLSRwONL ITAI BAD OI00 rAu1MUL v1+1 L+e-Bme INTERN.T vW,T.IUUB.C*X ` -,. ---June 18, 1999 Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: June 23, 1999, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 Adjusting the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Dear Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board: On behalf of ProLogis Trust, I am writing to support proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09 adjusting OCSD's capital facilities capacity charges, in particular the provisions in the ordinance that (i) create a three-tiered rate structure for commercial/industrial uses, based upon low, medium, and high demand, and (il) provide a fee credit for replacement structures in the amount of the charge that would have been applicable to the previous structure(s). I addressed the Board of Directors at your May 26 meeting. My client and I wish to personally thank each member of the Board and your staff for your open-minded consideration and willingness to change the "replacement structure" fee credit provisions in the interest of fairness to your ratepayers. =016/014601/6]r U. sW18M RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board of Directors June 18, 1999 Page 2 Once again, ProLogis Trust supports the proposed ordinance to adjust OCSD's capital facilities connection charges. Very truly yours, & TUCKER, UP UPAty M. Oderman JMO:cjh cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq., General Counsel Don McIntyre, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance Charla Rios, ProLogis Trust (w/enclosure) II710164WOM 2M34. 06M" 6/22/1999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts 1989.2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-06 2005-06 2008-07 Average Daily Flow 272 279 285 290 296 303 308 313 Less SAWPA and IRWD (23) (25) (27) (29) (31) (33) (35) (37) Area 1-13 Flows 249 254 258 261 265 270 273 276 MGD change from prior year 19 5 4 3 4 6 3 3 Approx new EDUs 73,077 19.231 15,386 11.538 15,385 19,231 11,538 11,538 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124,800 39.520 10,400 8,320 6.240 8,320 10,400 6.240 8,240 MFR Units/Apts 68.500 21,692 5,708 4,567 3,425 4,567 5,708 3.425 3,425 Non Res 1000 sf 112.500 36,625 9,376 7,500 5,625 7,600 9,375 6.625 5,625 Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820.00 71,926,000 18,928,000 15,142.000 11.357,000 15.142.000 18,928,000 11,357,000 11.357.000 MFR Units/Apts $ 1.275,00 27,657,000 7,278.000 5.823,000 4,367,000 5,823.000 7.278.000 4,367,000 4,367,000 Non Res 1000 sf $ 675.00 24,047.000 6.328.000 5,083,000 3.797,000 5,063,000 6,328,000 3,797,000 3,797,000 $123,630.000 32,634,000 26,028,000 19,521,000 26.028,000 32.534,000 19,521,000 19,521,000 SAWPAB IRWD Combined capacity purchases,mgd 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Estimated costs $ 7.500.000 60.000,000 15,000,000 15.000,000 15,000.000 15.000,000 15.000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 Total Estimated Connection Fees $183.630.000 47,534,000 41,028,000 34.521.000 41,028,000 47,534,000 34,521.000 34,521,000 Connection Fee budgets will be revised annually to reflect the actual flow for the preceding year and the estimated for the current year. Facilities will not be built unless the actual flows are on the requirement or capacity curve. G:\excel.dta\fln\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\conn caustin 6122/1999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts 2007-OB 2008-09 2000-10 2010-11 20'IM2 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Daily Flow 318 323 328 331 334 337 339 341 343 Less SAWPA and IRWD (39) (41) (44) (46) (48) (51) (53) (55) (57) Area 1-13 Flows 279 282 284 285 266 286 286 286 286 MGD change from prior year 3 3 2 1 1 Approx new EDUs 11.538 11.538 7,692 3,846 3,846 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124.800 6,240 6,240 4.160 2,080 2,080 - - - - MFRUnits/Apls 68,500 3,425 3.425 2,283 1,142 1,142 - - - - Non Res 1000 at 112,500 5.625 5,625 3.750 1,875 1,875 - - - - Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820.00 11,357,000 11.357.000 7,571,000 3,786,000 3,786,000 - - - - MFRUnits/Apls $ 1,275.00 4,367,000 4,367.000 2,911,000 1,456.000 1.458,000 - - - - Non Res 1000 at $ 675.00 3,797,000 3,797.000 2.531,000 1.266.000 1.266,000 19,521,000 19.521.000 13.013,000 6,608,000 6,508,000 - - - - SAWPAB IRWD Combined capacity purchases,m9d 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 Estimated costs $ 7,500,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 22,500,000 15.000,000 15,000.000 22,500,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 Total Estimated Connection Fees 34,521,000 34.521.000 35,513,000 21,508,000 21,508,000 22,500,000 15.000,000 15.000.000 15,000.000 G9excel.dla\fin\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\conn caustin 6/22/1999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts Total Existing Total 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Additions 1998-99 2020 Average Daily Flow 345 347 349 352 245 Less SAWPA and IRWD (58) (59) (60) (62) (15) Area 1-13 Flows 287 288 289 290 230 MGD change from prior year 1 1 1 1 60 230 290 Approx new EDUs 3,846 3,846 3,846 3,846 230.767 884,615 1.115,382 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124,800 2,080 2.080 2,080 2,080 124,800 474,000 598,800 MFR Units/Apts 68,500 1.142 1,142 1,142 1,140 68,500 238,000 306.500 Non Res 1000 at 112,500 1,875 1,875 1,875 1,876 112,500 420,000 532,500 Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820.00 3.786,000 3.786,000 3.786,000 3,786,000 227,138.000 862.680.000 1,089,818,000 MFR Unibf Apls $ 1,275.00 1,456,000 1,456,000 1,456.000 1,464,000 87,339,000 303,460,000 390,789.000 Non Res 1000 sf $ 675.00 1,266,000 1,266,000 1,266,000 1,266,000 75.941,000 283,500,000 369,441.000 6,508,000 6.508.000 6,508.000 6,506,000 390,418.000 1,449,630,000 1,840,048,000 SAWPAB IRWD Combined capacity purchases, mgd 1 1 1 2 47 15 62 Estimated costs $ 7,500,000 7.500.000 7,500,D00 7,500,000 15,000,D00 352,500.000 38,742,037 389.242,037 Total Estimated Connection Fees 14,008,000 14,008.0D0 14,008,000 21.506,000 742,918,000 1,486,372,037 2.229,290,037 G:\excel.dta\fin1210lstreedbld d copy\STRATPLMconn caustin o�ai u .9y iwo i 6ew nu. u June 22, 1999 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 & 2 BID TABULATION Standby Power& Reliability Improvements Job No. J-33-1 Engineer's Estimate: $650,000 Construction Contract Budget: $3,200,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Southern Contracting Company $ 1,290,000 2. Shasta Electric $ -1.495,040 3. KPRS Construction Services $ 1,526,607 4. Olsson Construction $ 1,677,913 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to Southern Contracting Company in the bid amount of$1,290,000 as the lowest and best bid. 'Corrected amount. Shasta Electric's inc orr total was $1,495,000. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H:Wp.dunengVOBS&CONTRACTSV-33-1V-33A Bid Tab.00c Revised 05119198 OCSD • P.O.Box B127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Board Agenda Item No. 21 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. J-33-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTMASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT- BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ; INCREASE. BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEt%) Project Development $ 1,030,600 $ 1.030.600 $ 1.030,600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1,030,600 100% Design Staff $ 1,371,000 $ 1,371,000 $ 808,600 $ 808.600 $ 274,356 34% Consultant PSA $ 2,121.748 $ 2.121.748 $ 2.121.748 $ 2,121.748 $ 654.738 31% Construction Contract $ 9,240,000 r2.248,652 $ 1.300.000 $ 1290000 $ 2.590.000 $ 0% Construction(Other) $ 55,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 0% Construction Staff $ 1,139,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 2.248,652 $ $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 15,391,000 $ 17,206,000 $ - 1 $ 5,525,948 $ 1,290,000 1 $ 6,815,948 $ 1,959,694 29% $1.3M was authorized at the May PDC Meeting for pre-purchase of generator equipment. Mwn.Ma%n,,V2p WWMV-33.11 J433-1 hw Wnba4bb F.Revl IV17M ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 06/23/99 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ i — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ ✓ _.� — (COOK) ............................ COLLINS....................... ✓ �� — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... i �L — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... ✓ �� — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... a- — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �L — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... �L — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... ✓ — — (WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON................... . — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................i/ mGat (MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... d ✓ — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. ✓ ✓ _ (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... — (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ ✓ _ (FRESCHI)....................... PATTERSON................. .a� e — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ — — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ _ (SMITH. GREG) ............... SHEA........................... (m_ — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... ✓ _� — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... � — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA.........................�/ ✓ (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... ✓ a—�.Yb _ — STAFF: 0 Anderson Hodges ogd li ✓ Hod es ✓ Kyle ✓ /kcu� Ludwin � 0 McIntyre Miles r °� Ooten Peterman Streed ✓ Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: , Woodruff I✓ ,_ q}� Andrus • 03/24/99 �l x�d ✓ H:1wp.dla%admin%BSXDIRECTORWirWom Rotl Call.doo SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F A-3 9 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) S Uw ,Q ✓r12 yY.ts. Sy Tyr IoNNR1Ci1 ��1S1TV'2=C�fLM �IE�Huo�t�S�&S �' L ln�ahn Resid C, l CN.oN> 6pRJxlaf cOM WWRDTAV DMINISSIFORMSOGWIN FORM.D *4-- REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: (v IZ3/�9 AGENDA ITEM NO. 't(J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: &(`c JQeew (number/street) �ti br_ 1 9n c(a C tA-, ct 2 b (city/zi\p code) TELEPHONE: ��(N > (✓ rib( REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) Predon`datal Wp.dtMadmiOBSTORWReque to Speak d% %a REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AL ERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAYBE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. q DATE: Z3 / 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: .3 oZ/ �RA/i1Vl�/Ei✓ (number/street) yyll S 9 x /rd/lr G/a (city/zip rode) p TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: S C L (self/name of organization) \tradon\datal kwp dWadminTST0RMS\Request to Speak.doo REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . ../�. . . .q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ru/'B//7/7� •��9g ,,,/ HOME ADDRESS: -/V Wy*-&� /q r- (numbedstreet) Y0407 (citylzziipp code)2 TELEPHONE: �--3 �6- /3�d3 �(— 13�/C)/ REPRESENTING: Zl/�* (selflname of organization) \4adonWatat\wp.dta�admiNBS\PORMS\Requeet to Speek.doo REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS AY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITEDTO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 2 AGENDA ITEM NO y- . . . . . . . . . ewx ✓vy NAME: (please print) f HOME ADDRESS: 3b IE� (num street) (city/ziziip code) TELEPHONE:— I,,((p�� REPRESENTING: �_v�. cvv I"k✓wK-.j (self/nathe oforganization) \Vadon`datal Mp.A %aaminlBSXFORMSVRequest W Spmk.doo STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation I District, to be held on i ZG i C 3 194Z was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on / 1 19-?z IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this Z day of Ae'evA / Penny M. K ecretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H:1 W P.DTA\ADMI N\8S\FORMS\F27 A Protecting the Public Health and Envtronnre41 Arough Excellence in Irste •attr.Sucn•urs" Newts PIPELINE fr Vol. 6 No. 5 May, 1999 Process Controls Integration, formed known as the 111d .. J� Jw�ia 7I Ii �111 Plant Automation Group, is charged with identifying Some people call him computer technologies that will provide operators, "Mr. Y2K" because of his maintenance staff and engineers information to pivotal role in our Year improve their decision making and make their jobs - 2000 readiness efforts. easier Others call him "We changed the name of the group to better define "Seinfeld,"which is a our role," explains Rob. "Our efforts are not geared fitting description for his toward automating the plant so it can run itself. quick wit and sense of Rather, we want to better utilize technology. For humor. The rest of us example, without the appropriate use of technology, just call him "Rob," the we may find ourselves doing unnecessary electrical engineer from maintenance on one piece of equipment while missing the Information required maintenance on critical equipment... I r Technology Department. or responding in a slower, less-efficient way to ��Ja Jl1J!l�jJJJl1 Rob Thompson is pretty a process upset condition" humble when it comes "A computer can't do everything," continues Rob. AvLion 950 to his nicknames. Ya, "Operations and Maintenance staff will always be he knows he's funny. needed. But if we can make improvements via But when it comes to computer technology to help us do our jobs better the projects he works and more cost effective, lens do it!" on...well, he always gives the praise to his It's this enthusiasm and willingness to experience co-workers, like Larry the unknown that has always been a Thompson trait. Kraemer, "who has made In 1990 when he was a young electrical engineer this huge Y2K project fresh out of college, Rob went on a job assignment bearable," says Rob, to northern Alaska. Rob was the electrical engineer "and to the people on supporting the installation of a $100 million water the Process Controls processing plant. Rob's job was to answer all Integration team who electrical and instrumentation questions for the are very good at what contractors and clients at three different facilities they do." related to the project. -4 •DO- Jif hym Mis CWU 1 Oft And conference presentations so far, which shows the " Congratulations to Jeff interest other agencies Brown, who received the have in OCSD's work. CWEA 1998 Research Achievement of the Year Jeff received the award in o Award for the Primary April during the California Effluent Filtration Project Water Environment (� (better known as the Association (CWEA) Fuzzy Filter project). conference, which was held in Ontario. Jeffs The project has achievement was our sole ,J- 1 generated three CWEA statewide award technical articles and two this year. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Is a Is ■ ■ ■ ■ a a a Lend a Helping Hand Help Clean Up _ the Talbert Marsh Why Clean Up the Marsh? _I - The Talbert Marsh is a wonderland in our own �� y backyard. It is one of the products of thed_ _ 1 Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, which was organized in 1985 by a group of Huntington Beach residents in our neighborhood. - The Conservancy is a non-profit corporation Thanks to all the folks that have dedicated t the preservation and restoration of searched through their old photo coastal wetland areas in the Huntington Beach coastal zone. albums and come up with some great things for us to look at. The objective is to remove non-native invasive We need your help to keep this plants from the marsh. It is also a great special feature going! opportunity to learn more about the marsh and Answers to April's Photos Revealed its Flora and fauna. A. New Control Center 1963 Bring gloves, heavy-duty trash bags, garden tools B. Teletax telemetering indicating Flow transmitter for for weeding, hat, sunscreen and a friendly spirit. plant effluent Flow at Plant No. 1 1959 Saturday, June 12, 1999 at 10 a.m. C. Control Center 1963 Mr. Tremblay (center) Meet at the bicycle path entrance off of Call the GUESS LINE at ext. 4837 to record your Brookhurst Street just south of Plant No. 2 answers. Remember..- include NAMES and DATES If you have any questions call Lena Yee Hayashi at(714)9833771, of photos. Brian Keating at ext.7218,or Ingrid Hellebrantl at ext.7115 Look for 0e answers in the next issue of me News Pipeline. If you have any Photos or a little story you would like to submit,please contact Ingrd (heSchby Nxnnng "Hewb V"QhbMdundskWA"my Hellebrantl at ext. 7115 Thanks for your panicipatlonr anJ�he.Sovrhran llumin¢mn Hindi.\'ei¢M1fwrk,md.L.aximmn Earth Day 1999 - Think Green Do We Recycle COL R D Paper? . Hot Yet, But We'd Like To thy'• The Purchasing Division was recently asked if we - recycle used colored paper as well as with used white e 3. paper. They did some checking and realized it was 4F difficult to determine just how much colored paper - could be recycled. Not one to be discouraged, Rick Hannappel convinced our recycle paper vendor, CVT Recycling, to provide us with a container on a Mal basis to see if it would be cost effective to recycle colored paper. If any of you have accumulated colored scrap paper or plan on doing so in the future, you may bring it to the warehouse at either plant, or put it in a box and rmm leh to rider-Danny Dar ,Ycrrre 3ahwal-11.,cn Hnan Knuag7ana oruy, our"bus runner"will be happy to pick it up on his ivdv Huahn. Drrm Comm and Eunire Kiznah sirh remeU in M1und recycle inn. Tree planting ceremonies were held at both plants to We will track the amount of paper we handle and recognize this special day. Employees also wore their Earth Day t-shirts that where sold by EAC members, make a determination if colored paper becomes 13 part of the District's recycle program. Thanks! Dual u wyeuua a Lew nU. 4L June 22, 1999 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 &2 BID TABULATION Standby Power& Reliability Improvements Job No. J-33-1 Engineer's Estimate: $650,000 Construction Contract Budget: $3,200,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Southern Contracting Company $ 1.290,000 2. Shasta Electric $ -1,495,040 3. KPRS Construction Services $ 1,526,607 4. Olsson Construction $ 1,677,913 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to Southern Contracting Company in the bid amount of$1,290,000 as the lowest and best bid. 'Corrected amount. Shasta Electric's in:ZF7* David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H.1 pAlebngUOBS&CONTRACTSU-33-1U-33-1 Bid Tab.dm Revised 0511WM OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 927288127 . (714) 962-2411 Board Agenda Item No. 21 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. J-33-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ' INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 1.030.600 $ 1.030.600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1,030,600 100% Design Staff $ 1,371.000 $ 1.371,000 $ 808,600 $ 808.600 $ 274,356 34% Consultant PSA $ 2,121,748 $ 2,121.748 $ 2.121.748 $ 2,121.748 $ 654,738 31% Construction Contract $ 9,240,000 $ 9,240,000 $ 1.300,000 $ 1,290,000 $ 2,590.000 $ 0% Construction(Other) $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 0% Construction Staff $ 1,139,000 $ 1,139,000 $ 250000 $ 250,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 2,248,652 $ 2,248,652 $ $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 15.391.000 $ 17.206,000 $ - $ 17,206,000 1 1 $ 5,525,948 $ 1,290,000 1 $ 6,815.948 $ 1,959.694 29% ' $1.3M was authorized at the May PDC Meeting for pre-purchase of generator equipment. n Wp.db'ertg172Wnud Mj-M-1 J311 b M gen bgtable Fmm Favlsad 1N17MO • a June 23, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors y FROM: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager SUBJECT: Strategic Plan Flow Projections and New Connection Fee Calculation The purpose of this memo is to discuss the attached spreadsheet for projected capital facilities capacity charges. The Strategic Plan projections in the spreadsheet indicate that the District's influent flow will total 272 mgd in 1999-00, increasing to 352 mgd in 2020. Our current annual average flaw is 250 mgd. The significance of the projected flow rate in 1999-00 is that it is quite conservative, and our actual flow will be less than projected. If one assumes that our flow was to increase 22 mgd, as predicted, then the connection fees associated with the new connections would total $183,000.000. Actually, our annual connection fee receipts run less than $10 million. While this disparity may appear alarming at first, I'd like to offer the following explanation: • The actual amount of future flow increases will naturally balance itself with the connection fees actually collected. Simply put, if new connections do not occur, the District will not collect fees. And, if new connections do not occur, flows will not increase as projected, therefore new facilities won't be needed. • The District revisits its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) annually during the budget cycle. If flows do not increase, implementation of planned projects will be delayed. • Projects slated for implementation in the near term (first five years of the Strategic Plan) are mostly intended to accommodate existing flow, not projected growth. There are very few new capacity projects in the 1999-00 CIP budget. • The Strategic Plan flow projections were started three years ago, using data from 1995. These flow projections have not been realized in FY 1999-00. However, OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley.CA 927284127 • (714)962-2411 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714) 962-2411 Page 2 June 23, 1999 This Information is being forwarded to the Board in response to a request for information from a member of the public concerned with the proposed connection fee structure revisions and the Strategic Plan draft EIR. The concern expressed by the citizen is that fees are so low, that we may not be able to cover our capital costs. DM:jdh:jak URADON\DATA?\W P.DTA\ENG\720\HERBERGMANNFEEMEMO.DOT Attachment 622/1999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 20D5-06 2006-07 Average Daily Flow 272 279 285 29D 296 303 308 313 Less SAWPA and IRWD (23) (25) (27) (29) (31) (33) (35) (37) Area 1-13 Flows 249 254 258 261 265 270 273 276 MGD change from prior year 19 5 4 3 4 5 3 3 Approx new EDUs 73.077 19,231 15.385 11,538 15,385 19,231 11,538 11,538 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124,800 39,520 10,400 8,320 6,240 8,320 10.400 6,240 6.240 MFR Units/Apts 68.500 21,692 5,708 4.567 3,425 4.567 5,708 3,425 3,425 Non Res 1000 at 112,500 35,625 9.375 7,500 5,625 7,500 9.375 5.625 5.625 Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820,00 71,928.000 18,928,000 15,142,000 11,357,000 15,142,000 18,928,000 11.367.000 11,357,000 MFR UniW Apls $ 1.275,00 27,657.000 7,278,000 5.823.000 4,367,000 5.023,000 7.278.000 4.367.000 4,367.000 Non Res 1000 sf $ 675.00 24.047,000 6,328,000 5,053.000 3,797.000 5.063.000 6.328,000 3.797.000 3,797,000 $123,830,000 32,534,000 26,028,000 19,621,000 28,028,001) 32.534.000 19,521.000 19,521,000 SAWPAB IRWD Combined capacity purchases, mild 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Estimated costs $ 7,500.000 60,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000.000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15.000,000 15.000,000 Total Estimated Connection Fees $183,630.000 47,534,000 41,028,000 34,521.000 41,028,000 47,534,000 34,521,000 34,521,000 Connection Fee budgets will be revised annually to reflect the actual flow for the preceding year and the estimated for the current year. Facilities will not be built unless the actual flows are on the requirement or capacity curve. G:\excel.dla\fn\210\slreed\old 4 copy\STRATPLN\conn caustin 6/22/1999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts 2007-08 2008-09 20OD-10 2010-11 2011.12 2012.13 2013.14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Daily Flow 318 323 328 331 334 337 339 341 343 Less SAWPA and IRWD (39) (41) (44) (46) (48) (51) (63) (55) (57) Area 1-13 Flows 279 282 284 285 288 286 286 286 286 MGD change from prior year 3 3 2 1 1 Allprox new EDUs 11,538 11.538 7,692 3,846 3.846 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124,800 6,240 6.240 4,160 2,080 2,080 - - - MFR Units/Apls 68,500 3,425 3.425 2,283 1,142 1,142 - - - - Non Res 1000 sf 112,500 5,625 5,625 3,750 1,875 1.875 - - - - Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820.00 11,357,000 11,357,000 7,571,000 3,786.000 3,786,000 - - - - MFRUnits/Apts $ 1.275.00 4.367,000 4,367,000 2,911,000 1,456,000 1,456,000 - - - - Non Res 1000 sf $ 675.00 3.797.000 3.797.000 2,531,000 1,266,000 1,266.000 19,521,000 19,521,000 13,013,000 6,508,001) 6.508,000 - - - - SAWPA 8 IRWD Combined capacity purchases, mgd 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 Estimated costs $ 7,500,OOD 15,000,000 15.000,000 22,500.000 15.000,000 15,000,000 22,500,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 Total Estimated Connection Fees 34.521,000 34,521,000 35,513,000 21,508,000 21,508,000 22,500.000 15,000,800 15,000,000 15.000.000 G:\excel.dla\0n\210\streed\old d copyWTRATPLN\conn causlin a M211999 4:20 PM Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Projected Receipts Total Existing Total 2016.17 2017.18 2018-19 2019.20 Additions 1998-99 2020 Average Deily Flow 345 347 349 352 245 Less SAWPA and IRWD (58) (59) (60) (62) (15) Area 1.13 Flows 287 288 289 290 230 MGD change from prior year 1 1 1 1 60 230 290 Approx new EDUs 3,846 3.846 3.840 3,846 230,787 884,615 1.115,382 New Connections Total Additions SFR Houses 124,800 2,080 2,080 2,080 2,080 124,800 474.000 598,800 MFR Unite/Apes 68,500 1.142 1.142 1,142 1.140 68,500 238.000 306,500 Non Res 1000 at 112.500 1,875 1.875 1,875 1,875 112.500 420,000 532.500 Connection Fees Avg Rate SFR Houses $ 1,820.00 3,786.000 3,786,000 3,786,000 3.786,000 227.138,000 862,680.000 1,089,818,000 MFR Units/Apts $ 1,275.00 1,456,000 1,458,000 1,456,000 1.454.000 $7,339,000 303.450.000 390,789,000 Non Res 1000 at $ 675.00 1,266,000 1,288,000 1,266,000 1,268.000 76,941.000 283,500,000 359,441,000 6.508,000 8,508,000 0,508,000 8,508,000 390.418,000 1,448,630,000 1,840,048,000 SAWPA 8 IRWD Combined capacity purchases,mgd 1 1 1 2 47 15 62 Estimated costs $ 7,500,000 7.500,000 7,500,000 7.500.000 15.000.000 352,500,000 36,742,037 389.242,037 Total Estimated Connection Fees 14,008,000 14,008,000 14.008,000 21.506,000 742,918.000 1,486,372,037 2,229,290.037 G\excel.dla\fin\210\slreed\old d copy\STRATPLN\conn caustin RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW w vwwinfwSNly IxCW OmO R OVE9IDOxY COwn...T0"6 6n M1MON 60VLL VARO, SUITE IaOO nw n COSTA I. CALIFORNIA g2626-1968 DIRECT ALL MAIL . COX IQSO MAR COST^ MESA, CALIFORNIA 6266-I 2 Y60 icLeRMoxL v1a 6+.6100NFA r.cclx.L. 111+1 m6-eo26 .^ INTEPxfi wwV.INEO.LgII no June 18, 1999 Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: June 23, 1999, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-09 Adjusting the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Dear Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board: On behalf of ProLogis Trust, I am writing to support proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09 adjusting OCSD's capital facilities capacity charges, in particular the provisions in the ordinance that (i) create a three-tiered rate structure for commercial/industrial uses, based upon low, medium, and high demand, and (ii) provide a fee credit for replacement structures in the amount of the charge that would have been applicable to the previous structure(s). I addressed the Board of Directors at your May 26 meeting. My client and I wish to personally thank each member of the Board and your staff for your open-minded consideration and willingness to change the "replacement structure" fee credit provisions in the interest of fairness to your ratepayers. uvm6404-00I)MM,04. "Iu RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board of Directors June 18, 1999 Page 2 Once again, ProLogis Trust supports the proposed ordinance to adjust OCSD's capital facilities connection charges. Very truly yours, Tey TUCKER, LLP Oderman JMO:cjh cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq., General Counsel Don McIntyre, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance Charla Rios, ProLogis Trust (w/enclosure) nL016401 0002MM. aWJV" California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region r- Winston H.Hickox Intemet Address: hilp.//www.swrcb,u.gov/—mgcb8 Grey Davis SecreraryJor 3737 Mnin Stma,Suite 500,Riverside,CWifomia 92501-3339 Goremos Environmental Phonc(909)7824130• FAX(909)781- 288 Prorenion June 22, 1999 Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708-8127 ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT NO. 99-58 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Enclosed is a certified copy of Complaint No. 99-58, assessing administrative civil liability of$50,000 regarding the July 21, 1998, discharge of sewage to Newport Bay as a consequence of a construction accident. OCSD may waive its right to a public hearing in this matter. If you choose to waive a hearing, please sign the enclosed waiver form and submit it to this office prior to August 6, 1999 with a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board for the proposed civil liability amount not suspended ($10,000). The remainder of the liability ($40,000) is suspended, contingent upon OSCD's timely and satisfactory completion of one or more supplemental environmental projects (see paragraph 9 of the complaint). If you choose not to waive your right to a hearing, a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date. If you or your staff have any questions, please contact me at 9091782-3234, Mark Adelson, chief of the board's Surveillance and Enforcement Section, at 909/782-3234, or Ted Cobb, the Board's staff counsel, at 916/657-0406. Sincerely, -t v L&W -ro r Gerard J. Thibeault Executive Officer Enclosure: Complaint No. 99-58 Cc: Regional Board SWRCB Office of the Chief Counsel - Ted Cobb California Environmental Protection Agency Z.Rerycled Pnyer Donald F. McIntyre June 22, 1999 Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 2 Cc., continued: SWRCB Compliance and Enforcement Unit Orange Co. Health Care Agency— Larry Honeyboume Southern California Gas Co., Santa Ana— Christopher Roady J.L. Stanton Construction Co., Whittier—Craig Fantoai Moffatt & Nichol, Ontario—Michael Kramen MKCentennial, Irvine—David Wandering Gail Pickard Mgalacictrans.dorJowdatatpch@arches California Environmental Protection Agency ,15 R,ry kd Paper California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region IN THE MATTER OF: Orange County Sanitation District ) Complaint No. 99-58 10844 Ellis Avenue ) for P.O. Box 8127 ) Administrative Civil Liability Fountain Valley, California ) 92708-8127 ) YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE THAT: 1. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is alleged to have violated provisions of law for which the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (hereinafter Board) may impose administrative civil liability pursuant to California Water Code Section 13385. 2. A hearing concerning this complaint will be held before the Board within 60 days of the date of issuance of this complaint, unless OCSD waives its right to a hearing. Waiver procedures are specified in Paragraph 10 of this complaint. If the hearing on this matter is not waived, the hearing will be held during the Board's regular meeting on August 20, 1999. OCSD or its representative will have the opportunity to appear and be heard and to contest the allegations in this complaint and the imposition of civil liability by the Board. 3. If the August 20, 1999 hearing on this matter is held, the Board will consider whether to affirm, reject, or modify the proposed administrative civil liability or whether to refer the matter to the Attorney General for recovery of judicial civil liability. 4. OCSD is alleged to have violated California Water Code Section 13376 by allowing or causing waste to be discharged to water of the state and of the United States without having filed a report of waste discharge and without having obtained waste discharge requirements from the Board for the discharge. 5. This complaint is based on the following facts: A.) A reinforced concrete box culvert was to be constructed near the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. Numerous underground utilities, including a 24" diameter pressurized sewage main ("force main") operated by OCSD, are located in the area of the construction. Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 2 B.) In the course of relocating underground utilities that would interfere with the construction of the box culvert, on July 21, 1998, OCSD's force main was damaged by a drilling contractor, causing the release and spill of approximately 122,000 gallons of sewage. C.) An estimated 20,000 gallons of sewage were recovered, and an estimated 102,000 gallons of sewage entered Newport Bay, to the east of the Newport Boulevard bridge over the channel leading to Balboa Coves. D.) As result of the sewage spill, Orange County Health Care Agency issued a precautionary beach closure for all beaches within the western half of Newport Bay from July 21 through July 26, 1998. 6. The discharge occurred from sewage collection facilities owned and operated by OCSD. Under Section 13385(a), OCSD is strictly liable for unauthorized discharge of wastes from this collection system. Pursuant to Section 13385(c), the Board can administratively assess civil liability in an amount not to exceed the sum of the following: A.) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000)for each day in which the violation occurs: and, B.) Where there is a discharge, any portion which is not susceptible to clean up or is not cleaned up, and the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons, an additional liability not to exceed ten dollars ($10) times the number of gallons by which the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons. 7. The maximum Section 13385(c) liability for the violation cited is $1,020,000. 8. Section 13385 (a) species factors that the Board shall consider in establishing the amount of civil liability. After consideration of these factors, the Executive Officer proposes civil liability be imposed on OCSD in the amount of$50,000 for the violation cited above. 9. The Executive Officer proposes that up to $40,000 of this proposed civil liability be suspended contingent on performance of a supplemental environmental project(s) acceptable to the Executive Officer. As a supplemental environmental project, OCSD proposes to connect to its sewage collection and treatment facilities the Back Bay drain, which is tributary to Newport Dunes Resort, in Upper Newport Bay. (Control of the input to the Bay from this drain (such as by sewer connection)was identified by Regional Board staff as a high priority for implementation of the coliform TMDL.) In the event that $40,000 is not required to complete this connection, OCSD proposes to conduct additional studies that will support ongoing efforts Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 3 to develop a toxics TMDL for Newport Bay and that, with the sewer connection,will total a $40,000 commitment. 10. OCSD may waive its right to a hearing in this matter. If OCSD waives its right to a hearing, sign the waiver, which is page 4 of this Complaint, and return it, together with a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of$10,000 (the proposed civil liability not suspended). Send the check and signed waiver to: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 11. If the supplemental environmental project(s) identified in paragraph 9, above, is not timely completed to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer, the $40,000 suspended liability shall become immediately due and payable. If you have any questions concerning this complaint, contact the undersigned at 9091782-3284, Mark Adelson at 909/782-3234, or Ted Cobb, the Board's staff counsel, at 916/657-0406. 6 / ZZ � `�9 Date Gera . Thibeault Executive Officer Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 99-58 Page 4 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region IN THE MATTER OF: Orange County Sanitation District ) Complaint No. 99-58 10844 Ellis Avenue ) for P.O. Box 8127 ) Administrative Civil Liability Fountain Valley, California ) 92708-8127 ) Waiver of Hearing Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) agrees to waive its right to a hearing before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with regard to the violation alleged in Complaint No. 99-58. OCSD has enclosed a check payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of$10,000 In partial settlement of the Complaint. OCSD also commits to the timely completion of one or more supplemental environmental projects that are acceptable to the Regional Board's Executive Officer and that individually or collectively represent a commitment of$40,000. Further, OCSD acknowledges that if the supplemental environmental project(s) is not timely completed to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer, the $40,000 suspended liability shall become immediately due and payable. Finally, OCSD understands that it is giving up its right to be heard and to argue against the allegations made in the Complaint, and against the imposition of, and amount of, civil liability. Date for Orange County Sanitation District ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary June 17, 1999 p 1419fi2-2411 p To the Chair and Members 4tt of the Board of Directors m.nieg.ddial eg B.8127 Subject: Board Letter r ilmn vanes.rA 92728-8127 .n«e over.. The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 10844 Ell..Avenue rountnn Vanes.C4 information on any of the items, please call me. 92708-7018 Government Finance Officers Association(GFOA) Award The District has again been selected by the Government Finance Officers Association endes (GFOA) to receive the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award. This award is the Metal A result of independent national review of the 1998-99 budget document by public Di[ies finance professionals. an.nalm The review results in positive comments and suggestions for improvement. In Brea general, the reviewers found the document proficient as a policy document, as a Buena Park c,"as financial plan, as an operations guide, and as a communications device. Suggestions Eoenran v Iles for improvement included more discussion of the impacts of staffing reductions, as Fu°eruvn well as the costs and savings of the capital improvement program. Carden clove 9 P P P 9 Huntington Beech lame Each year an individual in the Finance Department is selected to receive this award. Le Habre The recipient this year is Brad Cagle. Brad is the Financial Planning Manager, and is Le Palma P Y 9 9 9 Los Al.,,Wa the key staff person in assembling all of the data and information in the budget. He Newgart Beam has been with the District since 1996. Orange Plecenua Santa ane I have included a copy of the May 20, 1999 award notification letter and a list of the seal Been,tar. GFOA reviewers' positive comments and suggestions for improvements in the Stanton P 99 P T ahn attachments. ✓Ile Park Yorbs Linda ccunty of orange And, from the Municipal Treasurers' Association... sanl[arl, District. Certification of the District's Investment Policy. This award will be presented to the Costa Mena District during the Awards Luncheon on August 25 at the Municipal Treasurers' Midway Gty Association meeting in Salt Lake City. A copy of the notification letter is included in the attachments. Winter Districts .trine Ranch Status of Claim Settlements re County of Orange Attached is a June 15 fax from Counsel for the Orange County Investment Pool Participants providing an update on the proposed settlement agreement with -To Protect the Public Heshh and the Ennrunment through E+rallence m wastewater Slstems" q.. Members of the Board Page 2 June 17. 1999 Standard & Poors and a recap of Litigation Proceeds ($860,723,573.03) to date. Of those proceeds, the District should receive approximately$59 million of the $88 million in our 99-00 budget. Pressure Washing at Auto Dealerships In early 1998, a company named Polished Perfection began offering cleaning services for the auto repair facilities at retail dealerships. The primary cleaning areas were the repair bays where pollutants such as motor oil, antifreeze, and heavy metals accumulated on the floors. Polished Perfection offered an alternative method that included on-site pretreatment of the collected wastewater. The system removed most of the pollutants, which were later hauled away in drums. The system was more expensive to maintain than those of Polished Perfection's competitors, and the company struggled to hold on to its customers. Polished Perfection appealed to various government agencies for assistance, including the US EPA, the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD), the Orange County District Attorney's office, and the Orange County Sanitation District. The company claimed that its competitors were illegally disposing of wastewater to the stomt drain system. Based on evidence collected by the District Attorney investigator, charges were filed against one pressure-washing company for illegal disposal and unfair business practices. Two auto dealerships may also face civil penalties. The District is not involved in any litigation connected to this issue. The District and PFRD both sent mass-mailings to all Orange County retail dealerships, advising them against disposal to the storm drain system and defining the conditions under which sewer disposal would be allowed. Polished Perfection was featured in two articles in the Orange County Register, one in July 1998, and the second during April 1999. Copies of those articles are attached. On May 6, 1999, an attorney representing an unknown number of auto dealers contacted Source Control staff to discuss concems raised by the District's letter. The attorney wanted to know how to achieve compliance with the District's Ordinance. He was told that pollution prevention and other common practices would go a long way toward achieving compliance, and that all efforts were voluntary at this point. On May 20, 1999, Source Control staff attended the IECOC luncheon meeting to answer questions about the pressure-wash issue. House Passes Agriculture Spending Bill We have the language in the House Spending Bill that we've been seeking for the Chino Dairy Preserve projects. We're still hoping, through the Senate deliberations Members of the Board Page 3 June 17, 1999 on the bill, to get a specific funding earmark of$10 million for Chino. We are planning to spend $5 million each for the good control and manure management, through the activities of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (co-chaired by Blake Anderson), the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), and the Milk Producers Council. The House passed the fiscal year 2000 agriculture appropriations bill (HR 19(36) on June 8 by a vote of 246-183. The Chino report language that was included in the Agriculture Committee's original markup of the bill was included in the final version that passed on the &h. In an effort to gel the appropriation's ball moving, Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) crafted a plan to appease conservation members of his party, who had blocked passage of the agriculture-spending bill before the Memorial Day recess. Hastert's plan would shave funding off of defense, agriculture, and transportation spending bills in an effort to restore some funding for domestic programs deemed essential by moderate Republicans and Democrats. The plan would redistribute approximately$7 billion, which, in theory, would maintain the spending caps established under the 1997 Balanced Budget Amendment. Republican leadership, implementing the Hastert plan, made more than $100 million in last-minute spending cuts to secure passage of HR 1906. The bill would provide $60.7 billion in new budget authority, of which about $14 billion is discretionary spending. We hope that the final conference bill will earmark some of this for Chino. We anticipate that Rep. Gary Miller's office will circulate a letter to the SARW delegation to urge Senator Feinstein to include the Chino language in the Senate bill. We will urge her to push for the $10 million earmark when the Senate marks up their bill. Connection Fee Mail Out As the Directors were previously advised, we mailed approximately 26,000 notices last week. These notices were designed to notify owners of vacant properties that the connection fee or"capital facilities capacity charge"would be changing in 1999-2000. Such a notification may be a requirement of Proposition 218 and we wanted to be on the safe side. Most of the responses have been from mobile home dwellers who are unaffected but whose site is shown as vacant by the Orange County Assessor, because the value of the entire park or development is attributed to a master site. These callers have been pleased to find they are not affected. We will attempt to exclude these properties from future mailings. Members of the Board Page 4 June 17, 1999 About 35 calls have been received from owners of vacant property. None of these property owners have indicated they will attend the public hearing. In fact, many were relieved to learn they were not required to attend. One letter has been received from Irvine Apartment Communities. They are expecting to pull permits for a project in the Park Place service area in July, and have requested the lower MFR rates at that time. Because they will be applying for these permits after the initial reading of the Ordinance, the proposed Ordinance would permit the lower fees. Three a-mails have been received, but all related to mobile homes. In our favor, property owners have notified us that twenty-five "vacant" parcels are actually single-family residences; three are service stations and one is a restaurant. We have corrected our copy of the database so that these properties will be correctly charged in the future. Newport Beach Sewage Spill In July 1998, an OCSD sewer line ruptured and spilled approximately 100,000 gallons of raw sewage into Newport Harbor. The rupture occurred when a subcontractor, while drilling a dewatering well as part of a natural gas pipeline replacement project, drilled into the District's line. The contractor responsible for replacing the gas pipeline sent the District several Dig Alert notices but failed to mention that dewatering wells would be drilled in the vicinity of our sewer line. Relying on existing procedures in place at the time and experience with other gas pipeline replacement projects, District staff did not respond to the Dig Alert notices nor mark the sewer line in the field. The Regional Water Quality Board (RWQCB) staff recently completed its investigation and determined the District is solely responsible for causing the spill. Board staff is viewing the District's culpability under the strict liability provisions of the Water Code, in other words: "our pipeline, our sewage, our fault." Further, the Regional Board Executive Officer informed us that he intends to issue a complaint against the District ordering payment of a $50,000 penally. District staff is working with the Regional Board to develop a supplemental environmental project (SEP)that would satisfy all or a major portion of the proposed penalty. One proposal we are seriously pursuing is a project to sewer dry weather urban runoff that now flows into Newport Bay near Newport Dunes Resort. The bacteria-laden runoff has resulted in chronic closures of the beach in the area. Staff is in the process of drawing up the preliminary engineering design and cost estimate for the project. If we are successful in obtaining the approval of the Board staff for this project, it may be possible to settle the penalty complaint at the staff level and forego a public hearing before the RWQCB. ot' o- Members of the Board Page 5 June 17, 1999 It is staffs intent to work cooperatively with the RWQCB staff to resolve the matter administratively. The initial feedback we have received from the Regional Board staff has been positive. District staff will update the Board at the Steering Committee and Board Meeting with the latest developments regarding this matter. Summons Received re Newport Discharoe We have received a claim from Southern California Edison for'sewer contamination to vaults' in the amount of$2,063.97 resulting from this same incident. General Counsel will be responding. We are concerned that this could be precedence setting. Kern County Biosolids Ordinance I have included an e-mail dated May 10, 1999 that includes written comments from Bill Tracy to the Kern County Board of Supervisors on proposed changes to the interim biosolids ordinance. Mr. Tracy raises several interesting questions. Orange County Grand Jury Report On June 15, The Orange County Grand Jury released a report titled "Coastal Water Quality and Urban Runoff in Orange County." The report concludes that, despite recent emphasis on nonpoint source ocean pollution and runoff in storm drains, the efforts of Orange County agencies to solve the problem are fragmented and the public is inadequately informed about sources of ocean pollution and means of prevention. District staff was among a number of agency representatives, city personnel, environmentalists, and others interviewed during preparation of the report. The report contains seven findings and seven recommendations. Orange County Sanitation District, among others, is required to respond to two of the seven findings: 1. "Historically, nonpoint source pollution received little emphasis and it continues to be a major source of ocean pollution. Many programs addressing ocean pollution have been initiated by agencies and organizations in the county but there is insufficient coordination of effort both within the county and between Orange County and adjacent counties." (OCSD and Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department). 2. "Although there is agreement that the average citizen is a significant contributor to nonpoint source pollution, not enough has been done to enlist the cooperation of the public in eliminating the sources of the problem. There is also inadequate information reaching the public concerning the correct disposal of pollutants." (OCSD, OCPFRD, City Managers). Members of the Board Page 6 June 17, 1999 District staff is presently reviewing the report and will prepare a response in coordination with other affected parties. The District's response to the findings in the report is due to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court and Grand Jury by September 15. AMSA Legislative Alert Included in the attachments is the notification of one of AMSA's governmental affairs efforts, a brochure entitled Clean Water...We've Got the Point, Now Let's Get to the Nonpoint. If you would like additional copies, please call Jean Tappan at 7141593-7101. OCSD Tour Program I have attached a copy of a June 1, 1999 letter from Dr. Sharon M. Stem of UCI regarding our tour program. This is typical of the types of responses we have received, which help validate continuing our public outreach efforts. Correspondence re State Leoislation Attached are copies of two letters that I sent regarding favorable consideration of Assembly Bill 928 and Senate Bill 141 relating to the annual appropriation of the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation and maintenance of Upper Newport Bay. Local Federal Legislators Support Chino Drainage Projects A delegation of local federal legislators are supporting $10 million in funding for agriculture-related drainage control projects and manure removal within the Chino Basin Dairy Preserve. Congressional supporters include Representatives Gary Miller, Dana Rohrabacher, Ken Calvert, and Loretta Sanchez. The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture unanimously approved its fiscal year 2000 spending bill on June 15, 1999, The yet-to-be numbered bill contains report language directing the Natural Resource Conservation Service to continue assistance in Chino. The funding is an important component of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group's strategy to properly manage the manure in the Dairy Preserve and help prevent further downstream water quality impairments associated with rain and flooding. Attached are copies of the delegation's letters of support to the House Appropriations Committee. Additionally, the House version of the1999 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) contains language that would support Corp of Engineers assistance in the Chino Dairy Preserve on flood control projects. Members cf the Board Page 7 June 17. 1999 Environmental Lab Accreditation Program (ELAP) Included in the attachments is an e-mail dated June 1, 1999 from Sam Mowbray, Lab Manager, regarding staffs response to Phase 1 of the application process for ELAP recertification. It is another example of the outstanding accomplishments by our employees. Odor Complaints We have received several odor complaints from our neighbors near both treatment plants. Operations staff continues to respond and make process corrections as necessary. Review of process operations continues to try to pinpoint optimum operating parameters to eliminate these complaints. SWRCB Recognizes OCSD as Best in Class re Approach to Y2K Preparedness Staff has met with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) several times to update them on our Y2K program. SWRCB staff met with an EPA District IX representative and suggested a story be written and widely circulated on Best in Class approaches to Y2K preparedness for a small, medium, and large waterlwastewater District. The EPA District IX representative passed the idea on to headquarters in Washington. EPA headquarter liked the idea and hired Northbridge Environmental to write a story. Staff met with Northbridge Environmental on June 15. Northbridge Environmental already met with the small- and medium-size water/wastewater Districts. The District was chosen based on the recommendation of the SWRCB. Staff will have an opportunity to proof read and correct the article before publication. It will be distributed to you once it is published. Talbert Marsh Clean-up Several of our staff worked alongside members of the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association, picking up debris, trash and removing unwanted plants during Clean Up Day at Talbert Marsh on Saturday, June 12. As a goodwill gesture— and as part of our external public relations effort —we helped sponsor the event by supplying a dumpster(for disposal of waste from the marsh) and by providing refreshments for the volunteers. Talbert Marsh borders Plant 2. The Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association is comprised of residents living across the street from the plant. The group's Executive Board holds its monthly meetings in the Plant 2 training room. Members of the Board Page 8 June 17, 1999 Come to the Fairl It's that time of year again! The Orange County Fair is less than three weeks away and staff is busy preparing our booth. Following the theme "Join the Rush --A Salute To California's Sesquicentennial," our center-aisle location in the Orange County Building will follow the progress of sanitation systems, beginning with an outhouse and ending with the technology we use today. Nearly 30 employees have already volunteered to staff the booth and will complete a special training session prior to the July 9.25 event. Like last year, volunteers will be prepared to answer general questions from the public as well as provide updates on the District's Strategic Plan and the Groundwater Replenishment System. The information volunteers gain from talking to booth visitors has given us additional insight on public perception. For example, when discussing the Groundwater Replenishment System in prior years, most visitors were aware that reclaimed water was used for landscape irrigation, but were surprised the county wasn't already reclaiming water for drinking purposes. Directors are encouraged to slop by our booth and talk to some of the visitors. Special passes are available by calling Michelle Tuchman, 593-7120. Trip to Chino Basin to be Rescheduled Due to last minute scheduling conflicts, the June 12 trip to Chino Basin was cancelled. We will reschedule the trip for late August/eady September. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald A. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt MW OTAWMRMfi1ACIMLETTERS TO THE B ROVVM]]W OCC Attachments a GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue,Suite 800.Chicago.Illinois 80601 May 20, 1999 312/177-9700.Fw:312/977-4806 Mr. Michael D. White Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Dear Mr. White: A panel of independent reviewers has completed its examination of your budget document. We are pleased to inform you that the panel has voted to award your budget document the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the current fiscal year. This award is the highest form of recognition in governmental budget- ing. Its attainment represents a significant achievement by your organization. The Distinguished Budget Presentation Award is valid for one year. To continue your participation in the program, it will be neces- sary to submit your next annual budget document to GFOA within 90 days of the proposed budget's submission to the legislature or within 90 days of the budget' s final adoption. Enclosed is an application form to facilitate a timely submission. This form should be submitted with four copies of your budget accompanied by the appropriate fee. Each program participant is provided with confidential comments and suggestions for possible improvements to the budget document. Your comments are enclosed. We urge you to carefully consider the suggestions offered by our reviewers as you prepare your next budget. When a'Distinguished Budget Presentation Award is granted to an entity, a Certificate of Recognition for Budget Presentation is also presented to the individual or department designated as being primarily responsible for its having achieved the award. Enclosed is a Certificate of Recognition for Budget Preparation for: Bradley H. Cagle, Accounting Manager WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street,N.W.Suite 550.Washington.DC 20006 202/429-2750•Fez:202/429-2755 1998-99 GFOA Budget Review Results Positive Comments- • The budget document overall is excellent. • It's obvious that a great deal of time and effort have been expended to produce the publication. • Budget is rated outstanding as a policy document (2) • As an operations guide this document is excellent • I particularly enjoyed the debt financing section. • The effects of other planning processes is well integrated into the document plan. • The document provides a clear understanding of organization-wide financial and programmatic policies that address long-term issues and cencems. • The performance measures are the best that I have witnessed so far in terms of being measurable either quantitatively or qualitatively. • The goals and objectives of organizational units presentation is excellent. Suggestions for Improvement- • - As noted in prior year reviews,the document should describe the extent capital improvements impact current and future operating budgets.(2) • The document could be enhanced with an explanation of how staffing decreases will impact services in the various departments. • The Budget Message does not identify the addressee or have a date. • Only one format, either portrait or landscape, should be used throughout the document. • Laminate tabs to avoid wear and tear. (2) • Describe the population, local economy, and points of interest of the service area within the community profile. (2) O BUDGET REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARDS PROGRAM GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION For: Orange County Sanitation District, California Fiscal Year: 1998-99 The Budget as a Policy Document: This budget document is rated outstanding as a policy document. The document provides a clear understanding of organization-wide financial and prograrrunatic policies that address long-term issues and concerns. The discussion of operational policies reflects the choices made for the current fiscal year in conjunction with long-term goals. The goals and objectives of organizational units presentation is excellent. The budget message articulates priorities for the new year and describes significant changes in priorities from the previous year. The Executive Summary, however,appears to be unnecessary and duplicates or contradicts(rate increase for f=vs. sjX zones) information presented in the Budget Message and Financial Overview section. The Budget as a Financial Plan: Major revenue sources descriptions and underlying assumptions and trends for revenue estimates are clearly explained. The CIP section of the budget document is extensive and informative with project descriptions and justification. As previously noted in prior year reviews,the document should describe to what extent capital improvements impact current and future operating budgets. The Debt Service section has been enhanced with the implementation of prior year reviewers suggestions. The Budget as an Operations Guide: As an operations guide this document is excellent. The description of activities,services and functions carried out by the organizational units is very informative. Furthermore,the performance measurements are the best that I have witnessed so far in terms of being measurable either quantitatively or qualitatively. Personnel information is presented both graphically and in table form for multiple years. Although staffing changes are listed, the document could be enhanced with an explanation of how the staffing decreases will impact services in the various departments. The Budget as a Communication Device: As a communication device this document is rated outstanding. The document is easy to read and understand with significant budgeting issues presented and choices explained. Color graphs, charts and tables help illustrate a plethora of financial information to the lay reader. The document is attractive,well organized and reader friendly. The document could be enhanced with supplemental demographic information on the local population,local economy and points of interest GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARDS PROGRAM / BUDGET REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS For: �-7ez- p—/"- Fiscal Year: f)" (n me of government) The budget as a Policy Document: (o -If A2- The budget as a Financial Plan: The budget as an Operations Guide: The budget as a��Comppmuni�nication Device: 01 z! �Gdf'f' / O'� 9llafzc.� (tecc ,C2 (See reverse side for general comments.) �Juu MUNICIPAL TREASURERS,ASSOCIATION DNII(D STATES 6 CANADA May28, 1999 Donald McIntyre General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Dear Mr.McIntyre: The Municipal Treasurers'Association of the United States and Canada is pleased to present the Orange County Sanitation District with the Association's Investment Policy Certification. •Members of the Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee congratulate the Orange County Sanitation District for its success in developing a comprehensive written investment policy which meets the criteria set forth by the Association's Investment Policy Certification Program. Our review of your investment policy is limited to the documentation submitted. The Certification is not a guarantee against loss due to economic and market conditions or human behavior. Governments are welcome to submit their investment policies for review on an annual basis. However,the Investment Policy Certification Committee recommends that a certified government submit its investment policy once every then years or sooner if major revisions are made to the existing policy. The Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee Chairman,Jeff Cyphert,will be presenting the Investment Policy Certification plaque to all recipients at the Association's 1999 Annual Conference in Salt Lake City,Utah. The District will be recognized during the Awards Luncheon on Wednesday,August 25° Please see the enclosed Conference Registration Form. The Orange County Sanitation District is to be commended for enhancing its fiscal responsibility in the management of public funds. Sincerely, Stasl(AW14� Executive Director 1029 Vermont Avenue,NW,Suite 710,Washington, DC 20005 PHONE 202-737-0660 FAX 202-737-0662 Pillsbury - " aril Ar uW (ot a2cf evMpwAYnYSw(s Ym L.M CffW C48\WAn AAIAr9 Fa�(Po:• (61911>4f000 FAZ(ai9)]I61Af Mad190T1� Sutro LLP Wv ',b dale®- 1�1: (619) 544-3177 June 15, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL _ PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST i Re: In Re County of Orange - Status of Pending Litigation Dear Pool Participant: - Representative Tom Hayes has entered into a proposed settlement with Standard & Priors. The proposed settlement amount is$140,000 (so*Press Release attached herewith). Assuming the settlement is approved by the Court, all pending litigation for the benefit of Pool Participants and the County under the County's Second Amended Plan of Adjustment will have been resolved, with a total recovery in excess of$860,000,000. We are calculating each Pool participant's distributional entitlement from the litigation proceeds. We will sand you within the next two weeks a preliminary analysis of your likely distribution. We are also working with the Representative to prepare the motions necessary to approve the pending settlements with Standard & Priors and others, and to conclude the litigation phase of the case. Obtaining the Court approval of the proposed settlements and the Representative's final report, both of which are necessary to a final distribution, is expected to take 120 days. We will proceed with these matters as expeditiously as possible. I will appreciate your patience in awaiting the preliminary distribution which will he sent in the next two weeks. I will have a more complete report for you on process and procedures at that time. V yours, Patrick C. Shea co: Official Invesmunt Pool Participants Committee and Counsel Thomas W. Hayes bAY NffD IqT AN®.ES a¢w YOII(09AlGE(RM,�'SACPI.`@n0 bAH PFMLECO�rLeli VALLEY WA9@1grQL D.e leil9 2L u .. OrwW County Litigation Proceeds Rrcov Dare Aet"M Rego on fide band Janu 97 $1000.000 Rripavery on taxable note claim June 97 1 055,101.81 Merrill Lynch payment to tetmmate criminal Deoemba 97 27,671,25230 invedfigation - OvalanaRigness Nbmary 98 912,294.64 LeSuzur,Lamb,Cmxn&MacRae LIP April 98 45.000,Mo Credit Suisse First Boefon Ca ration May 98 57 500.000 RPMOPcat Mwwlo LLP Ma 98 175im= Mradl Lynch&Co. Jima 98 420014 13 Appaloom lung 98 11541.150.98 Mmgm Stanley&Co.,Dean Witter August 98 69,622,922 Re tie,Inc. Nomats Swurides ttacmatuanA Inc. August 98 47,877 008 Bear Steams Sc etmba 98 6,950.000 Broom&Wood November 98 23,046,414A0 SBC Capital.Inc. November 98 6500000 Paribas Corp. Novcmber98 1420,000 J4t'i Srcunuca lnm Dazmba 98 7.900.000 RattsebaPimcRgbaca.Inc. December99 10,000.000 BA Securities,Inc;Cantor Pitrgerald June 99 20,800,00D securities Corp.:Citibank,NA and (~ Cittmtp Securitiea,Inc:Daiwa Securities America,lnc;Dtmakiso 1,LuSan At Jenrette Securities Corporation and DLJ Mortgage Capital,Liu.;Pup Securities Inc;IGdder,Peabody&Co.Incorporated; Lehman lbothes huernatiwtal(Europe), Lehman Capital Corp„Lehman Commercial Paper,Inc.,and Lehman Brothers Inc;PaineWebber Incorporated and PaineWebber Real Estate Securities, trim:Prudential Securities lrtoorpoated; Sanwa Securities(USA)Cc,L.P.;and Smithliameyinc. tandaad&Poces Itaft&"ko June 99 140A00 Aovmulated latetestm pate 29 766,5M TBW%D June is. 1999: 1860,723AM31 'This aatamtm4vd=$13k37 m1111n vhkb:oW loam anermaby the 0mar Coup T"n4auflao . Aamaib.City ofombge,aadOmnge Caab wooer EtW icL rhldr Will he dnmbuad to mab uditles an pnallypaymestt . Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Monday, May 10, 19996:39 PM To: Woodruff, Tom; McIntyre, Donald Subject: FW: Draft Comments for KCBS, 05/11/99 1J Mltlrl W. r,.ti�e.n — Onpu l Message— From:Michael Tumipseed[maillo:m.turnipswd@cwix.coml Sent:Friday,May 07, 1999 I1:48 AM To:Bill Tracy Cc:Layne Bamldi;Blake Anderson;Penny fill; Stahl,Jim Subject:Draft Comments for KCBS,05/11/99 On BLACCO Stationary TO: The Kem County Board of Supervisors FROM: Bill Tracy, Buftonwillow Land and Cattle Company DATE: May 11.1999 RE: Comments on Proposed Changes to Interim Biosolids Ordinance Chairman MCQuiston, Members of the Board: My name is Bill Tracy. I am a member of the fifth generation of the Tracy Family that has operated the Buttonwillow Land and Cattle Company since 1863. Over the past 136 years, our family has labored to not only survive, but to be successful.We regard ourselves as stewards of the land, and feel we have a demonstrated over the past 136 years that we are both socially and environmentally responsible In our business practices. As you know,we use Class B Biosolids as a soil amendment in our farming operation. Since July of 1997,we have worked with county staff to develop a reasonable ordinance that would address public misperceptions about the use of Biosolids. It is our opinion, supported by sound, peer-reviewed, science that the use of Biosolids as a soil amendment is a safe method of recycling part of our society's waste stream. Based on the volumes of sound science and our own use, we find that the proper use of Biosolids is not only environmentally responsible, but a valuable farming input. Two weeks ago, Kem Food Growers proposed that Kem County ban the application of this material on privately owned land. It is my understanding that their request will be part of the CEQA process. Based on their comments, I have some questions for you,the Board of Supervisors. 1. Kem Food Growers have claimed that the use of Biosolids on privately owned land is a health risk. Is 9 not a health risk on publicly owned land? 2. Under Federal and Sate law, Biosolids are recognized as a legal, safe, farming input. In 1978,the state of California adopted and made law the Thurman Right to Farm Act. Since the use of Biosolids, is regulated by both federal and state law,why are you even considering the banning of this material? This is equivalent to a taking of our right to farm in a legal, ethical manner. The right to farm under the law is a fundamental property right. The banning of Biosolids is a taking of our right to farm under the law. Do you remember Ken Mabin, or Mr. Lin? Property rights are property rights. They must and will be defended at all costs. 3. A few years ago, the Kern County Board of Supervisors were leading the fight against the taking of private property rights. Has there been a change in county policy? We certainly hope not. We have been In contact with several organizations that support our right to farm. We owe it to previous generations of our family, to protect this precious right. You can be assured that the Tracy Family will do what ever 9 takes to protect and preserve our precious right to farm. Thank you . 1 )GARD ��Z rvt� anisa A L E R T To: Members B Affiliates From: National Office Date: Moy26, 1999 Subject: CLEANWATER... WE'VE GOT THE POINT NOW LET'S GET TO THENONPOINT Reference: LA 99-9 'Throughout the year AMSA has focused its government affairs efforts on three key priorities—clean water funding,wet weather programs and the impacts of nonpoint source pollution. Focused initiatives like The Cost of Clean and The Urban Wet Weather Priorities Act of 1999 have given definition to these issues and served as a catalyst for ongoing negotiation and debate. We are pleased today to provide you with a copy of AMSA's newest publication, Clean Water. . . We'vr. Got the Point. Now Let's Get to the Nonpoint, focusing attention on the issue of nonpoint source pollution. With this publication,AMSA has reached an important stage in executing the Association's three top legislative priorities. AMSA's National Environmental Policy Forum takes place in Washington, DC next week, and many association members will visit their congressional delegations, carrying with them The Cost of Clean, The Wet Weather Watershed Act of 1999 and Let's Get to the Nonpoint. By contacting lawmakers and presenting them with information on these priority issues,AMSA members will take the lead in advocating action on these critical clean water issues. AMSA has developed the nonpoint source publication with the intention of focusing public and congressional attention on the need to control the largest remaining source of water pollution—nonpoint source pollution. Clean Water. . . We've Got the Point. Now Let's Get to the Nonpoint outlines the causes of,and the issues surrounding,nonpoint source pollution. It also presents ten"Nonpoint Source Pollution Solutions,"which are steps that must be taken in order to attain the Clean Water Act's goal— the physical, chemical and biological health of the nation's waters. The publication calls for stronger laws and regulations, increased funding and further research—all aimed toward controlling nonpoint source pollution. Without a comprehensive national plan to address these needs, further water quality progress will be impossible. Members are urged to use Let's Get to the Nonpoint to educate the public,the press,and their lawmakers on the issues surrounding nonpoint source pollution. Further copies are available from the National Office by calling 202/833-AMSA or online in the"Publications"section of www.amsa-cleanwater.org. 1o011CWMricvtxrnun,.N%:Suite 410.Ui%hinpm.IX:9XkV+5.502• 202.ai;.2ti2 •202.ayi.4057 FT.C• hrtp:^uxw.vrtvckanxatrr.o� �r� aoiwx amsa Water . . . We've Got the Point. Now Let's Get to the NOnpoint . . . yn As runoff from rainwater. T irrigation or melting snow makes Its way to the nearest stream, river, lake or estuary, It picks up pollutants. For the most part, these pollutants f X x\ ti CI'6R I:01 in. consist of sediments and nutrients, but the runoff can (:LF;\\ 1% %TUR PRIORITIES also carry pesticides, bacteria and viruses, salts,oil, Getting to the nonpoinl becomes all the more critical as grease, toxic chemicals and heavy metals. How we use local governments continue to lay out huge amounts of the land determines what runs Into the water. Sources cash to meet tough Clean Water Act requirements.The of nonpoint pollution Include car and truck exhaust. Act requires cities, towns and counties to reduce wet coal-fired power plants, roads and highways. timber weather flows and to bring Impaired waters into com- harvests, abandoned mines and—the number-one pliance with state and federal water quality standards. source of water pollution—crops and livestock. But many communities across the country have no According to EPA, agriculture Is responsible for response when their citizens ask. "Why spend all this degrading 60 percent of the country's impaired river money when the bulk of the problem Iles elsewhere?" miles and half of the Impaired lake acreage. Nonpotnt source pollution closes beaches, contaminates and Put In perspective, urban flows are a small part of the kills fish, destroys wildlife habitat and pollutes drinking country's overall water quality problems. And although water. Yet there are limited federal controls. It mac local governments will spend billions of dollars to meet not be easy, but we must gel to the nonpoinl. the Acts requirements. they are powerless to These sources aren't going anywhere, but there are address the most per- basic on-the-ground measures that can stem the flow, vasive problem in most of pollution. A wide range of"best management prat- watersheds: nonpolntp ' �t flees" (BMPs) offers landowners ample opportunity to sources that seriously >c--. N „k: protect water quality. For Instance. "buffer strips" of pollute waters. With - { vegetation along waterways capture nutrients and gaps In the law, gaps sediments. and wetlands slow runoff, control flooding. in our economic and provide habitat and capture some toxic pollutants. scientific data, lack of "°•BfP"°PVFSf These and many other BMPs are encouraged and funding and no consistent.comprehensive mechanisms funded with state and federal dollars. But with little for monitoring and regulating those responsible for accountability built Into the process, there's not much nonpoinl source pollution. many communities may be assurance that taxpayers' money Is buying actual held hostage by someone else's pollution. water quality Improvement. amsa Association of Metropolitan Smierage .Agencies 1000Connecticut Avenue. NW The Association of Metropolitan Suite 410 Sewerage Agencies (AMSA)repre- Washington, DC 20036-5302 USA sents the nation's publicly owned 202-833-AMSA wastewater treatment agencies. 202-833-4657 FAX Its members serve the majority of the sewered population in the httpYAvwwamsa-cleanwater.org United States and collectively info@amsa-cleanwaterorg twat and reclaim over 18 billion gallons of wastewater each day. AMSA' members are true environ- mental practitioners dedicated to protecting and improving the quality of the nafion' waters. 0MRS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. IRVINE .I..µEIE\ • DAIN . U11 III • Vpl 11111:L1..1 µ11 AI.Dr . >C DI.:U SAS FµAICI♦ S+f,( 1111.1Rµ.1.1 sllI, 'µ1L �� Ad Environmental Analysis and Design 270 Social Ecology I School of Social Ecology Irvine.CA 92697-7070 (949)824-5576 FAX(949)824-2056 June 1, 1999 Michelle Tuckman and Suzanne Smith Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Michelle and Suzanne, I wanted to formally thank you, and make sure you realize how much I appreciate your help in conducting the field trips for all my students in my Environ E5 Class, "Environmental Quality and Health," at UCI. With the size of the class(450 students) and budget constraints, this is the closest way I can provide them with a"hands-on" experience. Although we've discussed the topic in class, and I've shown them slides, it is not until the students are present in your facility that they truly begin to appreciate the sophistication, the orderliness, and the important methods utilized to protect human health. And they also appreciate your willingness to provide this unique experience for them. You were organized, informative, and used just the right amount of humor. And the students were able to write very complete papers based on their field trip experience with you. I hope you will consider helping me out again next Spring 2000, when I teach this class again. Besides the papers, the students have made many positive comments about the value of your tour, and about you in particular. You've been successful in making a difference in these young people's lives; as educators, isn't that our dream??9 Thanks again, Sincerely, S� Sharon M. Stem Ph.D. Lecturer SOE 949-824-8214 email: smstem@uci.edu ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - LO May 19, 1999 phpne: Honorable Carol Migden 17141962.2411 Chair, Assembly Committee on Appropriations State Capitol, Room 2114 laeiiina.+4nen Sacramento, CA 95814 PO 8.8127 f .an Valley,M 92728-8127 SUBJECT: Support for Assembly Bill 928 (Brewer) —Suspense File enaae a"ress: 10844 Ellis Aaenue Po .San Valley CA 9270E-701e As you well know, on May 26, 1999 the Assembly Appropriations Committee will hear the many Assembly bills on the Suspense File. I urge your favorable consideration of AB 928 (Brewer) relating to a $400,000 annual appropriation to the Department of Fish and Game for the preservation and maintenance of Upper Newport Bay in Orange County. Marine e o As you may be aware, the State of California recently completed a $7.4 million 1,000,000 cubic yard sediment removal project. All of the agencies involved in the Bay acknowledge Weipp that a more cost-effective alternative would be to annually fund a smaller, maintenance level dredge rather than a project the scope of the current once-in-a-decade effort. Aneaean Bree Buena Park The restoration and preservation of the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve (a State C'Prsss asset administered by the Department of Fish and Game)is vital to the aquatic species, Flai Valley Fallerm plants and bird life that rely upon the quality of its habitat. The Orange County Sanitation Gorden�siiP District continues to support local and statewide efforts to protect this ecological jewel funPnpwn Bewh along California's P o-„ne g alifornia's beautiful coastline. An important component to this protection is the L.New. removal of sediment that blocks the bay's sailing channels and reduces estuarine La Paaaa Alamttos habitats. Los Ni Beecl: D'a'ea The annual appropriation of revenue to this Fund (as envisioned by AB 928) is the key to wac va Santa A. securing a long-term funding source for the sediment removal that must occur to keep the seal Beam Bay functioning as an estuary. Newport Bay is a critical regional resource for many of us Renton and for many reasons. Your support of AS 928 (Brewer)when the Committee hears bills Win Perk on the Suspense File will make a real difference in protecting this important State asset yoroa Lida nety of Orange /// // // 2err, Diserlose r;ee F � l�(.�( '„� �as Alas. Donald F. McIntyre.` Wiser city. General Manager aeer Olser1vea DMIJC:mem ay,np genon H:1WP.DTA%TS%355013501LETrERIAe 928 SUPPORT.DOC c: Assembly Member Marilyn Brewer Ken Emanuels avd'i9ed P. 2 CaUgTC92; Of the UtI teb 6tateg i b9tington, 18C 20515 April 14, 1999 The Honorable C.W. Bill Young, Chairman The Honorable David Obey,Ranking Member House Appropriations Committee House Appropriations Committee H-218 The Capitol H-218 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairman Young and Ranking Member Obey: We are writing in support of finding for$10 million to continue agriculture-related drainage control projects, as well as manure removal within the Chino Basin Dairy Preserve (Preserve)in San Bernardino County,California. This local cleanup effort is important to the susminability of the region's dairy industry and vital to ensuring high quality water for downstream users. Rapid up-slope urbanization in the region has created a funnel effect around the dairies, where as little as one inch of rainfall, causes a sheet of water to flow south,flooding the Preserve. The potential for uncontrolled flooding remains;threatening to cause washwater lagoons to breach and stockpiled manure discharges to flow into the Santa Ana River, compromising the water quality of a major drinking water source for the downstream population of more than 2.5 million people. Congress responded to this need in FY 1998 with an initial supplemental appropriation of $5.5 million for drainage control by the County and included in the FY 1999 budget, language directing USDA to continue this project. On-site concoction of the first two retention basins has commenced. The proposed appropriation would provide for the continuation of this project. In addition, due to the loss of adjacent agricultural areas and increasing public concern with protecting our ecosystem,dairy farmers' manure management options are becoming drastically limited. Currently, there are locally driven efforts underway to develop a manure management plan for the region. The first step of this plan involves removing the two million tons of stockpiled manure that is currently on the ground. Specifically, the County would use$5 million of the proposed appropriation for the purpose of removing manure from the basin. The State of California, local governments, and the dairy industry are committed to work together to share some of the costs of cleaning up the Preserve,protecting Santa Ana River water quality, and enhancing life in the watershed. Again,we respectfully request your support and leadership for this cost-shared cleanup effort,which is important to the economy,environment, and public health of the residents of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties. TNIfOMiCYG2DNRR a'i a'i966 P. Congrvo of the Unites �btatez - Wastlington, 3lDQZ 20515 April 14, 1999 The Honorable Joe Skeen, Chairman The Honorable Marcy Kaptur, Ranking Member House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies 2362A Rayburn House Office Building Washington,DC 20515 Dear Chairman Skeen and Ranking Member Kapmr: We are writing in support of funding for$10 million to continue agriculture-related drainage control projects, as well as manure removal within the Chino Basin Dairy Preserve (Preserve)in San Bernardino County, California. This local cleanup effort is important to the sustainability of the region's dairy industry and vital to enuring high quality water for downstream users. Rapid up-slope urbanization in the region has created a funnel effect around the dairies, where as little as one inch of rainfall, causes a sheet of water to flow south, flooding the Preserve. The potential for uncontrolled flooding remains;threatening to cause wastewater lagoons to breach and stockpiled manure discharges to flow into the Santa Ana River, compromising the water quality of a major drinking water source for the downstream population of more than 2.5 million people. Congress responded to this need in FY 1998 with an initial supplemental appropriation of $5.5 million for drainage control by the County and included in the FY 1999 budget, language directing USDA to continue this project. On-site construction of the first two retention basins has commenced. The proposed appropriation would provide for the continuation of this project. In addition, due to the loss of adjacent agricultural areas and increasing public concern with protecting our ecosystem, dairy farmers' manure management options are becoming drastically limited. Currently,there are locally driven efforts underway to develop a manure management plan for the region. The first step of this plan involves removing the two million tons of stockpiled manure that is currently on the ground. Specifically, the County would use$5 minion of the proposed appropriation for the purpose of removing manure from the basin. The State of California,local governments, and the dairy industry are committed to work together to share some of the costs of cleaning up the Preserve, protecting Santa Ana River water quality, and enhancing fife in the watershed. Again,we respectfully request your support and leadership for this cost-shared cleanup effort, which is important to the economy,eaviromnent, and public health of the residents of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties. McIntyre, Donald From: Mowbray, Sam Sent: Tuesday, June 01. 19992:14 PM To: Ghirelli, Robert;Anderson, Blake; McIntyre, Donald Cc: 630-Environmental Sciences Laboratory Subject: Application for Recertification under Environmental Lab Accreditation Program (FLAP) I would like to extend my sincere gratitude and thanks for a job well done[ The lab must recertify with the California Department of Health Services every 2 years. This recertification includes three phases: (1) preparing the application, (2)successfully analyzing unknown performance evaluation samples in the field of our cedification, and (3)successfully completing an laboratory-wide audit which is performed by ELAP. The lab has finished phase 1 of this process. This application involved updating the lab organization chart including resumes of staff, a complete revision of the Quality Assurance Plan and an extensive revision and re-writing of our Laboratory Operation Procedures Manual. The changes to the operation of the lab due to improved data handling procedures resulting from LIMS were included in this revision. Phases 2 and 3 will be completed this summer, All of this was professionally managed by Dan Tremblay and Kathy Waldron, and we owe them both a great debt of thanks. In orderfor them to do theirjob, each lab section and staff member contributed significantly by review and revision to sectional operating procedures. My thanks and gratitude to each of you. This accomplishment is even more significant when the overall workload of the lab this spring is considered. Some of the projects you completed are: assessment of the compliance of lab systems to Y2K including ordering of new instruments, analysis of methods of metals testing and submission of the application for approval of ICPMS for wastewater, completion of LIMS interfaces to several instruments, design of triggers within LIMS to alert the District to out-of-specification situations, completion of methods in metals and organic chemistry testing in order to support insourcing of the ocean monitoring program,response to the exceedance for PAHs, response to the request for MISE testing from the Regional Board, support of the dairy wastewater project, and response to the recent high coliforn counts along the south beaches. All of this was done while each of you continued your normal, high quality support of the various programs here at the District. WowlI I am impressed and I want you to know how proud I am to be a member of such a dedicated and high quality group of people. The bar was raised very high, and you responded. Thanks. Sam Mowbray Lab Manager t TH13 SAN DIEGO MINION-TRIBUNE • SATURDAY. MAY 89, 199W - "The mncem 'was whefher thiy"" av . were accurately, monitoring and m• ,t paWng their problem bledrargeet Rebating.'cords ' •;h•'. said.!'ate pr te." war; the rec6Ne ,,. weren't accurate." . Two sets of teiords apparpntly wore:,-� be ing kept by the sewage workers aecording to a federal IsvrienforeP --- w� ^•� : � '• den source ry'Lo spdke an the'c the., .� tlon of anonymity One set ltatl We 3: swap N • �' ` trve discharge recenla,whip the set -:f i•q ivlW Inarcvrate numbers was shown - ReeoM-keeping,pennit .,,. Ih raid to inspectors,the source said,. The treatment facilities are,operet. . at center of inYes don "ad by dvillal federal employees who ... a A 1,� .,,7� ( 'must be.certified by state and federal Casifns�/stwrB-1 •• 'Agents flit�8t1(�etQn : regulators.A Marine officer oversees' n -r '. :We operntlon and reports to the bases Marineidixlosed that the ralds a ' hi P8C01'�81n commanding general. taken place until questioned yeater-... t Y""'J : I Questions arose abort two months day by -Th+ San .Diego Milan- ,ago,Roberbba said. - 7yisurta - - - kJamq W.Cranlay His agency,which monhasthe Me.'- ' '. In.written comments yeaterrmay srnrrrasrrts - nines' compliance-with federal laws, the Marne Corps said it is ceopar Federal agents raided nine C;mV nodded the Environmental Protection sting with federal officials and hpq Pendleton sewage¢eatmeot plants Agency because the base holds a fed; hired an Independent testing firm to ,this week.while Investigating allegam.. eral sewage treatment permit,he add. check chlorine levels, tongthatcivifian workers falsified rr Previously,the regional water quail-- 'To date, all findings validate our, 'S cords on the amount of chlorine diq;' - ty agency had few problems with testing.program;' the.'statement 'charged by the Marine Corps. - Camp Pendleton treatment progrem, end. About 30 federal and state of clalsr said Robertue who oversaw the bases ;."However any 6llegatlon that M, fed by a phalml of FBI agents sfmube - sewage treatmentlapbhea in the early cords are being Wailed will be thorn i "taneously served search warrants at 19909 beforeretlringfrom the:Mddine ,, ougldykvesftated,"it stated i 830 a in.Wednesday on the sprawWtg Corps �A local environmental watchdog a Marine base's waste wafer treatment - The basea-aewi W's' stem Is dllfer I �a h'p said the ellegedn ar pe trou. station officials said, - L eat from many area treatment systems 'mg.; - • Marine othcfais ,add no envhon• that dump heated dOuen'into the 116:qommpletely unacceptable"r0 mental risk was Involved. Paelfie Ocew:.After treating the am. falsify racords said hilts Humid.o(_.. No arrests were made aid the W - age,the Marines pump it into a acries`.' - the Environmepal Health Coalition. vestigation Is still under way, F81-• - of shallow ponds.The waste water Is I "[ids feeds concerns .,abuut,01;- spokeswoan mJanCFddwe8said. allowed to filter Into the ground, re?, they do"she added. - . 1. the Investigation centers on the charging-the bases drinking-water'. Hunter pointed out Wart high ley- base'srecard-keeping and compliance'. ' aquifers and forming an underground old of chlorine can hartrr plant and with its fides] sewer treatment per, _ barrier against sea water infil"don. .' .aolmarllife. _ trills, said John Robertus, eaeeadve .Neither law enforcement nor,the d:': •A^ a•"' t director of the Regional Water Quality Control Board In San Diego. L ounty gears up Tor pay-Dy-penormance program for worKers rage 1 or i2 business finance "°me Page m �t CErGghLtW.0 ME ORANGE[WNTY REGISTER HELP I SEARCH Free Satellite System f w��I HOME PAGE After Rebate Dcl', TODAYSNEWS ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS&FINANCE County gears up for pay-by- •TaEays Stones •AI We,*Em. performance program for workers •LWal Lim •L,.i NM. •MeM1NPM. <IwW Fu . GOVERNMENT: Officials are setting aside $6 Campvt., +Neh Avenue million for the new incentive system. CLASSIFIED COLUMNS June 4, 1999 COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME&COURTS EDUCATION By JENIFER B. McKIM EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAINMENT& The Orange county Register TRAVEL FUN&GAMES The count 's more than 15,000 union employees ma HEALTH&FITNESS YY see more LIBERTY ONLINE than their allotted 3.25 percent pay raise next year in an effort LIVING&SHOPPING to tie performance to pay. POLITICS& GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE The county is putting aside some $6 million for the new SCIENCE& TECHNOLOGY program, which has taken almost two years to plan amid SERVICES& considerable employee skepticism. PROMOTIONS SPORTS&RECREATION WEATHER The extra funds are part of an effort by the county to become more accountable in the wake of the 1994 bankruptcy. The county hopes that for the average Orange County resident this will mean better and more efficient service. It should mean trash collectors, tax appraisers and health-care workers will be trying harder to be recognized and rewarded, officials say. "We are trying to incorporate into public service some of the best concepts from business," said Jan Walden an assistant county executive officer. "There is a clearer connection between service to the community and personal sucess." Nonmanagers will receive annual bonuses of up to 1 percent of their salary if they meet the goals. The Salaries of the county's 800 managers have long been tied exclusively to performance. The funding is included in the 1999-2000 fiscal budget, which was released Wednesday. http://www.ocregister.com/search/l9990604/business/bonus004w.shtml 6/10/9 Lu5 Mngeie i rmes rmo Page I of 2 . (Previous DoclQkg Doc 1 NEWS News ..... 'HIED Friday, June 11, 1999 OC Sanitation District responsible for summer spill e In its findings, the states Water Control Board asks for $50,000 in fines. By GREG RISLING EWPORT BEACH--Findings from an I1-month -.investigation conclude that the Orange County Sanitation District was responsible for a massive sewage spill into Newport Harbor last summer during construction of the Arches Bridge. The California Water Control Board, the agency that investigated the accident, will present its report next week to the county's sanitation district. The report places the responsibility directly on the district's shoulders and calls for a maximum of S50,000 in fines for its negligence. No other parties are named. "Through our lengthy investigation, we found that only the Orange County Sanitation District is culpable for its actions," said Mark Adelson, an environmental specialist with the state water agency. "They will be held liable for this discharge of sewage, which is our basis for this conclusion." The spill occurred on July 22, 1998 when a construction worker struck a 24-inch sewer line, spewing about 100,000 gallons of raw sewage onto Pacific Coast Highway and a parking lot adjacent to Arches Bridge. Health officials closed a portion of the harbor to swimmers for several days, fearing high levels of bacteria could cause further contamination. Adelson said the spill wouldn't have any lasting effects on the harbor. "We believe there wasn't any long-term damage done," he said. "Though the west-end beaches were closed for about a week, the effect to the bay environment is practically nil." The county's sanitation district will have 60 days to comply with the civil complaint. Under state guidelines, the maximum liability for an environmental mishap such as the Arches spill is $1 million in .../findcgi?action=View&VdkVgwKey=%2E"/o2E%2F%2E%2E%2Fvol7%2FCNS%5FDAYS 6/11/1999 nearcn by lid] Number Page I of 1 STATE and FEDERAL LEGLSLATTON STATE and FEDERAL REGULATTONS NEWS/REFERENCE TAT MESSAGE OF THE DAY SITE INDEX ® BAC Perform another search The parameters for this search: Bill ID(s): s530 Print strategy: long CA SB 530 AUTHOR: Costa Machado TITLE: Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Flood Protection LOCATION: Senate Appropriations Committee SUMMARY: Enacts the Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Act which, if adopted, would authorize, for purposes of financing a safe drinking water, water quality, flood protection, and water reliability program, the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of bonds in a specified amount. STATUS: 02/19/1999 INTRODUCED. 03/03/1999 To SENATE Committee on RULES. 04/07/1999 Withdrawn from SENATE Committee on RULES. 04/07/1999 Re-referred to SENATE Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES. 05/17/1999 From SENATE Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES with author's amendments. 05/17/1999 In SENATE. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES. 05/25/1999 From SENATE Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES with author's amendments. 05/25/1999 In SENATE. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES. 05/27/1999 From SENATE Committee on AGRICULTURE AND WATER RESOURCES: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. END OF REPORT Perform another search STATE and FEDERAL LEGISLATTON STATE and FEDERn REGULATIONS NEWS/REFERENCE CT MESSAGE OF THE DAY SITE INDEX HOME BAC O,Y^9h:I",W fim fmP fic mfm http://client.statenet.com/secure/pelsbs.cgi 6/9/99 Rome age � Elnews xaw�lslxco� THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH california rrWHOMEPAGE s Your Network Had a Check-Up Lately? TODAY'SNEWS TODAPage •Calilomla ENAW N0Wn •World ARCHIVES Petroleum spill eats up summer for BUSNESSI B FINANCE CLASSIFIED beach town COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME&COURTS DISASTERS: Avila Beach loses its beachfront as EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT Unocal will raze structures to clean up ENTERTAINMENT& contamination. TRAVEL FUN&GAMES HEALTH&FITNESS June 7, 1999 LIBERTY ONLINE LIVING&SHOPPING POLITICS& GOVRNMENT By MARTHA BELLISLE REAEESTATE The Associated Press SCIENCE& TECHNOLOGY SERVICES& AVILA BEACH —Hard times closed businesses, El Nino PROMOTIONS storms flooded streets and ripped apart piers jutting out from SPORTS&RECREATION PP P t ) g WEATHER this classic California beach town, but i[took a leaky petroleum pipeline hidden under tons of sand to force the demolition of the entire commercial beachfront—at the peak of the summer tourist season. The last shop owners tore down surfing posters and shuffled out boxes of swimsuits Sunday. Just down the street, a steady ocean breeze carried the putrid smell of oil from a slick floating atop an algae-green-colored pool at the bottom of a pit, half the size of a football field. "I've seen buildings come and go in this town," said Matthew Fanner, a 32-year Avila Beach resident. "But to see them all go under the bulldozer in one swoop is pretty sickening." Summer has been canceled at Avila Beach this year while Unocal Corp. makes good on its promise to clean up a 400,000-gallon plume of diesel fuel, crude oil and gasoline that has leaked for decades into the ground under the town of 300 people. Construction began last fall and is scheduled to end by next spring. With the beach off limits, blocked by orange mesh fencing, concrete barricades and bold "DO NOT ENTER" signs, the only people around are security guards who stroll the deserted street with foot-long batons dangling from their belts. http://www.ocregister.com/news/califomia/7beachOlw.shtml 6/9/99 wall hangings into a truck. "It's their beach, wejust live here,"joked Bill. "We live where the debris meets the sea." "It doesn't do any good to be angry," said Linda,a 14-year Avila Beach resident who plans to take a vacation during the construction. But what happens next worries some residents. "In many cases,Unocal is buying up the property," said John Euphrat,senior planner for San Luis Obispo County. 'They're now the largest property owner in the town." Families who have lived here for generations have moved out and are not sure they want to come back, said lifelong resident Farmer. He said he fears Unocal will ultimately profit from the oil spill. "They've systematically buying out the town,but what can you do when you're having the screws put to you?" Farmer said. Some fear the oil giant will sell off the property to a developer, who will remake this funky, laid-back hideaway into a posh, expensive resort. "What distresses me is I'm afraid they'll make it a theme-park look," said Margot Bourget, former manager of The Old Custom House,a patio restaurant a few doors down from the surf shop. 81 rlempeper In range aunty. .. Cafflontla CoWUM lggg TIne Orange County Register Please sand comments ap aCao1611f®dnk.tleedpm.Cpm http://www.ocregister.com/news/califomia/7beachOIw.shtml 6/9/99 • �� - A SECTION HELP? tOur Clkkhere .J ;J11J.J ri J� Virtual mur -Wednesday, une Babbitt Predicts Truce in Feud That Has Barred San Diego Water Deal By TONYPERRY• Timer Surf Writer merior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, in a speech Tuesday to a meeting of Western water officials in Colorado, expressed optimism that the angry dispute that has prevented large-scale water sales between the Imperial Valley ADVERTISEMENT and San Diego may soon be resolved. "We are now within closing distance of this,the largest water transfer in Western history," Babbitt told a gathering at M� l the University of Colorado at Boulder. "And when it is accomplished, it should put to rest the skeptics'claim that water transfers are unworkable." Last December, Babbitt said he wanted the deal consummated by mid-June. But within weeks, that deadline seemed virtually unattainable when the Metropolitan Water • . District of Southern California balked at the use of its Colorado Aqueduct. David Hayes,acting deputy Interior secretary, and Tom Hannigan, state water director, have tried to cobble together an agreement between the MWD,the San Diego County Water Authority and two desert water agencies that get the lion's share of California's allocation from the Colorado River: the Imperial Irrigation District and the Coachella Valley Water District. In hopes of meeting Babbitt's deadline, closed-door negotiations are planned for Friday, Saturday and Monday at MWD headquarters in Los Angeles. Officials of the desert agencies say that one suggestion being floated by Hayes would provide additional water for the MWD in exchange for use of its aqueduct to bring part of the Imperial Valley's share of the Colorado River to thirsty San Diego. "There are still substantial issues yet to be resolved," said Tom Levy, general manager of the Coachella district, when asked to comment on Babbitt's optimism. Babbitt's speech also signaled his intent to use the final months of the Clinton administration to continue redirecting water toward environmental uses rather than increased residential growth and agricultural irrigation. "The big task of the coming century will be to restore rivers,wetlands and fisheries," he said. Still,possibly as an inducement to the MWD to accept the http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000051714.html 6/9/99 ews co ie n ex co SCIENCE ��7 tnt HELP ®tvEd�J n sorere iClick, �IJJ.J J� o a a tinual Tour ues a}, June 8, 1999 U.S. Closes Oil Platform After Suspected Leak .Pollution: A sheen estimated at less than a barrel of crude is spotted off Orange County coast. The rig will be reopened when repairs are made. By DEBORAH SCHOCH, Times Staff Writer 13 n oil-drilling platform nine miles off the Orange County coast has been shut down so investigators can determine if an underwater pipeline leaked oil over the weekend. Platform Eureka will remain closed until the suspected leak ADVERTISEMEM in a pipeline 700 feet beneath the ocean surface is found and mended, federal officials said Monday. remote control submarine will be deployed today to scrutinize the pipeline for a leak. News of the leak is ill-timed for the oil industry, with the state Coastal Commission meeting today in Santa Barbara to Want to know begin grappling with controversial plans for new drilling off what's ootaLly the Central Coast. worth a thousand Platform operations halted Saturday off Orange County words! after the sighting of an oil sheen in the area. Federal officials suspect that the oil--estimated at less than a barrel--leaked from a 12-inch pipeline linking Eureka and Platform Elly,two of the three platforms in the giant Beta production unit operated by Aera Energy LLC, which Mobil Oil Corp. and Shell Oil Co. jointly own. The incident marked the first known leak in the pipeline, and the first time that Platform Eureka has been closed because of a leak since it began operating in 1985, Aera and federal officials said. "There have been very few underwater pipeline leaks along the California coast," said John Romero, spokesman at the U.S. Minerals Management Service regional office. "Overall, leaks from pipelines are not a frequent occurrence." An Aera spokeswoman said that only half a barrel,or 21 gallons, may have leaked, comparing that to the average 4,500 barrels a day produced at Platform Eureka. The sheen was noticed Saturday morning from the Beta complex,and workers initially thought that it might have been caused by bilge water from a passing ship. They later determined that it was oil, and Platform Eureka was closed early that afternoon, said Aera spokeswoman Susan Hersberger. By 1 p.m.,the sheen had formed a ribbon about two miles long and 20 yards to 100 yards wide,said a U.S. Coast Guard employee who toured the area by helicopter Saturday. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/SCIENCEIENVIRON/t000051376.ht?1 6/9/99 ew5 GO Ife n eX GO 71710, - �. ORANGE COUNTY NEWS NECLpv MA:IKE T01UP AoL:.:. Tuesday,June 8, 1999 Bankruptcy Deal Nets $20.8 Million ■ Finance: The payment by 12 Wall Street firms raises county's total recovery to $860.6 million. Just one defendant remains. By E.SCOTT RECKARD. Times Staff Writer ringing lawsuits over Orange County's financial collapse RELATED nearly to a close, a dozen Wall Street firms agreed to O.C.SECTIONS pay Orange County $20.8 million Monday for their roles in the nation's largest municipal bankruptcy. MAIN PAGE The settlements increase the county's total recovery to $860.6 million--about half of what it lost in 1994 on NEWS BY investments that backfired. COMMUNITY The firms that settled Monday were accused of contributing SPORTS to the debacle by providing credit or risky securities to then- Treasurer Robert L. Citron to further his heavy betting on low PREP SPORTS interest rates.They admitted no wrongdoing. The county treasury, with $7 billion in funds from the BUSINESS county and 200 cities, schools and public agencies,lost more SO CAL LIVING than$1.6 billion when the Federal Reserve forced rates up sharply. CALENDAR The settlements close out the county's lawsuits accusing brokerage, accounting and legal firms of wrongdoing in CALENDAR connection with its bankruptcy. WEEKEND Its sole remaining suit,which its lawyers acknowledge will HOME DESIGN be a difficult one,attempts to blame the bond rating firm Standard & Poor s for failing to sound alarms as the county COMMENTARY skidded toward insolvency. A judge has ruled that to recover T.V.TIMES damages,the county must show S&P knew it was publishing falsehoods by assigning its highest ratings to the county's 1994 bonds. The$860.6 million includes$26 million in interest on settlements awaiting distribution, $1 million from an insurance ADVERTISEMENT policy protecting the county against financial gaffes by its officers, and several other minor bankruptcy-related matters. But the settlements come mainly from former professional advisors to the county,notably Merrill Lynch& Co.,Citron's chief investment house. Merrill paid more than$450 million to http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000051515.htm1 6/8/99 evidence for it to apply in connection with the 1993 ratings. The judge ruled,though,that there is sufficient evidence for a jury to hear the case involving the bonds in 1994,when criticisms of Citron's investments surfaced publicly. In another blow to the county,Taylor has ruled that any damages against S&P must be offset by what already has been recovered.That could mean the county can't recover a nickel from the bond rating house unless S&P's liability exceeds $820 million. "It's fair to say that Judge Taylor's rulings have severely impaired the case against S&P,"said James Mercer,a county lawyer. "It's a very difficult case" even setting aside the fact that jurors might assign much of the blame to Citron,he said. The county's lawyers have argued that it's unfair to use the entire amount recovered so far to offset damages against S&P. Taylor has yet to rule on exactly how the offset will work, and the settlements collected so far can't be distributed until a ruling is made and any appeals settled.That could take several months, said Michael Swartz,another lawyer for the county. • ss Dividing the Settlements Allocation of banluupty lawsuit settlements under a formula worked out by Orange County and the cities, schools and agencies that invested in its treasury: TOTAL RECOVERED: $860,583,573 A$54.7 million:Schools B$325.2 million: Cities&Public Agencies C$202.8 million: County D• $1712 million: Schools,cities&public agencies $106.7 million: County 'Allocation based on percentage of remaining losses.No individual figures for schools, cities and public agencies was provided. Source:Hennigan,Mercer&Bennett law firm. Co ri t 1999 Los Angela Times.All Rights Reserved b Search are archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar antics about: ORANGE COUNTY—GOVERNMENT—FINANCES BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENTS,SECURITIES INDUSTRY—SUITS.You will not be charged to stories,only to retrieve one. http://www.latimes.com/HONE/NEWS/ORANGE/t000051515.html 6/8/99 VoCbusiness finance I Home Hage _ Sm tYgl&tYr.Coin THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH Free Satellite System `.. After Rebate Don't' TODAYS HEM ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS&FINANCE Todays Stones Brokers, county settle claims •At Wcik Extra -Legal Line :Legal Notices BANKRUPTCY: Standard & Poor's is the last big :5�e etplaw ee litigant to contest any culpability. •Work eU A nnvenlogyue&computing CLASSIFIED June 8, 1999 COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME It COURTS By RONALD CAMPBELL EDUCATION The Orange County Register EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAIN ENT& TRAVEL Orange County set the stage Monday for the final Campaign in FUN&GAMES g ty g yHEALTH&FITNESS Its courtroom war on Wall Street. LIBERTY ONLINE LIVING&SHOPPING POLMICS& The county settled claims against a down securities brokers GOVERNMENT for$20.8 million. REAL ESTATE SCIENCE It TECHNOLOGY With the latest settlements,the county has collected$860.6 SPROMOTIONS ERVICES& million from advisers and brokers for allegedly contributing to SPORTS&RECREATION its 1994 bankruptcy. The county and other public agencies lost WEATHER $1.6 billion in the bankruptcy, which was triggered by a series of high-risk bets on the bond market. The county is still pursuing one big-money claim,against bond-rating agency Standard & PooPs. The county alleges that S&P helped induce the bankruptcy by giving the county unrealistically high ratings. S&P has said that county officials lied to obtain the high ratings. S&P has vowed not to settle. A trial could begin in U.S. District Court sometime in the fall. Settling Monday were BA Securities Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Corp.,Citibank, Daiwa Securities America Inc., Donaldson,Lufkin&Jenrette Securities Corp.,Fuji Securities Inc., Kidder Peabody & Co. Inc.,Lehman Brothers Inc., PaineWebber Inc., Prudential Securities Inc., Sanwa Securities (USA) Co. and Smith Barney. The county will share the money with more than 100 other public agencies,including cities,water districts and sewer districts. Michael Swartz,an attorney for the county,said the county still could file lawsuits against Leifer Capital, a former financial adviser,and the law firm of Buchalter Neuter Fields http://www.ocregister.com/business/oclit008w.shtml 6/8/99 Home Page iLnews ecaaRlAtWXOM THE ORANGE couNrV REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH california HOME PAGE TOCAY'S NEWS s Your Network Had a Check-Up Lately? :Fmnte. .,a;ion •wond ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE Sewage plants at Pendelton raided BUSINESS BUSINESS&FINANCE by FBI, water officials COLUM'NSO COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME A COURTS ENVIRONMENT: Assertions were made that EDUCATION EMPLOYMEcivilian workers misstated the amount of chlorine ENTERRTANENT& discharged. ue TRAVEL LaMEs HEALTH A FITNESS May 30, 1999 LIBERTY ONLINE y LIVING A SHOPPING POLITICS A GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE The Associated Press SCIENCE A TECHNOLOGY SERVICES A CAMP PENDLETON—FBI agents and water-quality PROMOTIONS officials raided nine Camp Pendleton sewage-treatment plants SPORTS A RECREATION the past week to investigate claims that civilian workers THER falsified records on the amount of chlorine discharged at the military base that extends to with a few miles of Orange County. About 30 federal and state officials served search warrants in raids Wednesday, although neither law-enforcement or Marine Corps officials disclosed that the raids occurred until questioned Friday,the San Diego Union-Tribune reported in Saturday's editions. FBI spokeswoman Jan Caldwell on Friday said no arrests were made and said the investigation is ongoing. Marine officials said no environmental risk was involved,the paper said. The Marine Corps issued a statement Friday, stating it is cooperating with federal officials and has hired an independent testing company to look at chlorine levels. "To date,all findings validate our testing program,"the statement said. "However,any allegation that records are being falsified will be thoroughly investigated. Civilian federal employees operate the base's treatment facilities,while a Marine officer oversees the operation. http://www.ocregister.com/news/califomia/30sewage.shtml 6/l/99 • �� - METRO HELP J Thursday, May 27, 199 Beaches Still Fall Short on Pollution Report Card ■ Environment: In annual review of county coastline, Heal the Bay awards eight A's and 22 F's in rainy season, about the same as last year. By JOHN L. MITCHELL. Times SlafJWraer © he lingering effects of last year's El Nirlo-fueled storms and sewage ronoff from this year's sporadic downpours produced another season of poor water quality grades at Los Angeles County beaches, the environmental group Heal ADVERTISEMENT the Bay said Wednesday. ® Ina Memorial Day weekend tradition,the regional environmental group released its ninth annual ocean safety report card and once again warned beach-goers to avoid bacteria laden swimming areas. "Overall,this year's water quality is comparable, almost as bad as last year," Heal the Bay Director Mark Gold said at a news conference at Will Rogers State Beach below Pacific Palisades. The annual report grades beaches on a scale of A to F,with an F going to beaches where the amount of fecal bacteria is high and so is the risk of contracting illness. The report ranks 61 locations along county beaches that attract 60 million visitors annually, Gold said. In this year's report,Los Angeles County beaches received roughly the same grades as last year, with 34 A's and six F's during the dry season;and eight A's and 22 F's when the rains cause harmful contaminates to flow more easily into the ocean. Among the beaches receiving failing grades,the report singled out Mother's Beach in Marina del Rey, Surfrider Beach in Malibu and Cabrillo Beach inside the breakwater in San Pedro as the most polluted beaches in the county. Heal the Bay's statistics are based on daily and weekly water quality monitoring data gathered by Santa Monica's Environmental Monitoring Division and the county's Department of Health Services and Sanitation Districts. The Department of Health Services recommends that beach- goers avoid contact with ocean water for three days after a rainstorm. At Wednesday's news conference, Gold also announced plans to expand the group's weekly report card from its current 61 locations in Los Angeles County to a total of 250 beaches, including Santa Barbara, Ventura and Orange counties. Gold said he would support posting letter grades on lifeguard towers similar to the ones used to rate restaurants. http://www.latimes.com/HON4E/NEWS/METRO/t000047694.html 5/27/99 ome _age _ �� iy aQ community news t 0aiglstlerOM THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP f SEARCH Garden Grove to pay for sewer HOMEPAGE service TODAY'S NEWS ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS a FINANCE UTILITIES: Many residents could also see CLASSIFIED increases for trash collection. COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS •TotlarlyI's Stones May 25, 1999 •C�oammuniy Evems •Crime&Couns -Education By MAI TRAN ;F1 TT"°,' � The Orange County Register •GreoAn -Legal Line •Legal Nagree GARDEN GROVE—Notices will be in the mail Wednesday •oeitualies to let residents know that many of them may have to start OC.PPolg Teens Govemment paying for sewer service.And some could be paying double •Reglsler In Eduragen for trash services as city officials scrap for cash to pay for a :sn%ioI Features deteriorating sewer system and debts. CRIME a COURTS EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT Residents currently not being charged for sewer service could ENTERTAINMENT& TRAVEL be billed$3.78 a month,and$4.41 a month more than they FUN&GAMES pay now for trash service—or about$98 more annually for HEALTH&FITNESS both. LIBERTY ONLINE LIVING&SHOPPING POLITICS& West Garden Grove residents would be hit hardest—paying GOVERNMENT REAL ESTA $3.78 for sewer and$8.91 a month more than what they pay SCIENCE&TE now for trash,or$152.28 more each year. TECHNOL a Y RVICESPROMOTION$ "I'm not happy with that pretty big lump." said Kathy Mazza, SPORTS&WEATHER CREATION who grew up in Garden Grove and is facing a possible$98-a- year increase. "But if they don't charge us here,they'll charge us some(way) else." A public hearing is scheduled for July 14.The rate change is expected to pass unless 51 percent of the affected residents voice their opposition through a written protest before the public hearing. The rate changes would take effect in September, making Garden Grove's trash rates one of the highest in the county. City officials said rates must go up to pay for repairs to the decaying 431-mile sewer-line system and to save for future replacements. The 50-year-old system has corroded interior lines and 142 areas of sagging lines created by grease buildup, said Les Jones,director of public works.A city comparable to the size of Garden Grove normally has about 12 areas of sagging lines, http://www.ocregister.com/community/sanit025w.shtml 5/25/99 ail community news ome age_ _ m, i� 0pIStKC� THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER HELP I SMCN crime & courts HOME PAGE TODAIrs NEWS Fight for cleaner Aliso Creek ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS S FINANCE continues CLASSIFIED COLUMNS COMMUNITY HEM COURTS: Two Laguna Beach men sue to get Bea: o`:'°"°` improvements to water districts' systems. .C."g Cm ft " •Edimill" •EI Tom May 24, 1999 so-°..alrn •Gm.M -Legal Lim By MAYRAV SAAR Legal Np s The Orange County Register OC IM Teeens •PoIUn A Goramment LAGUNA BEACH—Maybe he'll lose again. -RegisterIB Edaullon 'agerLlFeaWma CRIME S COURTS Maybe he'll have to give up his truck or turn over every dime EDUCATION from his house-painting company to cover attomeys'fees. EMPLOWEir ENrs TRAVEL Winningm court isn't the rut. He's already lost one court FUN A GAMES 1b y HEALTH A FITNESS case and is pursuing another. LIBERTY ONLINE LMNG A SHOPPING POLITICS A Still, Briggs Christian Moms-Smith has already won on some GOVERNMENT small level. REAL ESTATE SCIENCE A TECHNOLOGY Since the Vietnam veteran took on.the fight two ears SERVICES A g y ago f07 PROMOTIONS a cleaner Aliso Creek,two of Aliso Water Management SPORTS A RECREATION Agency's member sewer districts have spent more than WEATHER $600,000 upgrading their pump stations,according to court documents. Moms-Smith is suing Moulton Niguel and.South Coast water districts, in part,to force such improvements after a series of sewage spills over the decade helped pollute the creek,which pours out into the ocean. Water district officials said the improvements they've made were spurred by a 1997 spill and by recent findings of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,which is studying the Aliso Creek watershed. It's a tare civil case that pits an individual against a public entity—about one in 100. For one,the suits are costly.And individuals who win are generally suing to stop an action.not receive compensation. So the incentive to fight in this way is not great, said Craig Johnston,professor of law at Lewis& Clark College in Oregon. http://www.ocregister.con/community/crimecourtstwau%204w.shtml 5/24/99 ... _.__.._. . ...... ....-., w.........a l arc J Va 1 A few minor spills followed the 1992 malfunction. And on Jan. 7, 1997,a 3 a.m. power surge caused a glitch in Moulton Niguel's system, resetting pumps at one station to handle only low levels of activity. About three hours later, residents of Laguna Niguel,Aliso Viejo and parts of Laguna Hills, Mission Viejo and Dana Point started to wake up and shower. From 3 a.m. to about 9:30 a.m., when the problem was discovered and corrected,the pumps became overwhelmed. The station backed up with 580,000 gallons of waste water and raw sewage,according to officials from both water districts. It was the equivalent of 100,000 toilet flushes, Moms-Smith's attorney, Patrick Goggin, said. With the plug in place,more than 440,000 gallons of that backup poured out of a manhole,through AlisoCreek and into the ocean a few hours before Moms-Smith dove into the waves for his daily morning swim. "I learned about the spill the next day," said Morris-Smith, who had been swimming more than 100 yards from the creek mouth. Two days later, Moms-Smith's body ballooned with swelling, he said. Having recently watched his mother wither from chemotherapy,Morris-Smith elected not to go to a doctor. But he said believes the inflammation is related to swimming in sewage. DEBATING THE FUTURE Morris-Smith first sued the districts in federal court in 1998, demanding that the plants be shut down until even more upgrades were made to the pumping station. Goggin said the districts were in violation of the Clean Water Act, but U.S. District Judge Gary Taylor dismissed the claim last year because,he said,Goggin did not prove that future spills were Rely. Moms-Smith's ally Dennis Morin not only thinks future incidents are likely,he said such spills happen all the time. Morin, who owns the "Rock House" property abutting the creek,said the smell of sewage fills the air of his oceanfront home regularly and has decreased his property value by about $1 million. A local real estate agent is assessing the actual value. "I watch little kids sitting out there in this water all summer long," he said, looking out his living-room windows at Aliso Creek. "You know those kids go home and get sick." http://www.ocregister.com/community/crimecouTwwatrx2O4w.shtral 5/24/99 _ community news omeage OCgglctK.[or THE ORANGE call REGISTER I MEW I SEARCH Pounding by waves is taking toll HOME PAGE on county's primary sewage outfall ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS&FINANCE ENVIRONMENT: Officials say it may take $13 CLASSIFIED million to repair the pipeline, which has lost a COLUMNS NEWS portion of its protective rock cover. •C•Todayaoachessmrles -Community Events May 22, 1999 .ee vu Courts Click here -El Tom .Hmwatm By GARY ROBBINS for video footage. •Growth The Orange Register sort -Legal Lure 9 County 9 .Legal Nations This video require seire •OC Teens Real Playeroamo d I or m •OC Teens Yeah of battering by huge waves have IxwNOed It hem •Pagtin It Government tom away parts of the protective rock ie I range Register In In Education County NewaChannel;for •Religion blanket that shields Orange County'S mom Pictures on this arm •special Features largest ocean sewage pipeline,re uirin other Orange county CRIME A COURTS B P P 9 B . nears,area OCN 24 EDUCATION repairs that could cost$13 million. hews a de . EMPLOYMENT You can a mall OCN at: ENTERTAINMENT& 1'he waves have caused downs of 200-' eon lilnk.lesseom.cam can a GAMES poundpound rocks to roll off the concrete pipeline along a one-mile HEALTH a FITNESS stretch that begins a half-mile from where the sea-floor outfall LIBERTY ONLINE B LIVING It SHOPPING enters the ocean at the Santa Ana River mouth, says the POLITICS& Orange County Sanitation District, which operates the outlet. GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE SCIENCE A "We don't think the shifting has made the outfall vulnerable to TERwc�O s a Y failure,but we do need to replace boulders and are hoping that PROMOTIONS it will extend its life," said Doug Stewart,a sanitation district YSPORRTS&RECREATION engineer. The pipeline was built in the late 1960s and pumps about 243 million gallons of treated sewage per day into the ocean four to five miles from shore. Most of the sewage comes from 2.2 million people in northern and central Orange County. District engineers said the rock slides were discovered over the past two years during inspections of the pipeline—an outfall that could extensively pollute the coasts of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach if it ever broke. Most of the slides apparently were caused by large storms whose 20-to 30-foot waves sent turbulence into the sea floor, causing boulders to roll up to 25 feet away from the outfall, said Duane Jensen of Carollo Engineers,one of the district's consultants. Next month,Oregon State University will pummel a scaled- down version of the pipeline in a wave tank to determine what size rock should replace the loosened boulders. Engineers say http://www.ocregister.com/search/I9990522/community/pipe022w.shtml 5/24/99 • ;, - ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP uesday, May 1 , 1 9 D.A. Seeks More Staff on Toxins .Safety: Enforcement need rises with stiffer state standards on underground storage tanks. By SEEMA MEHTA, Times StafWriter o bolster efforts at prosecuting owners of hazardous RELATED underground storage tanks, including some gas stations, O.C.SECTIONS the Orange County district attorney's office will ask county supervisors today for more than$600,000 to add five MAIN PAGE staff members. Strict new federal standards prompted the request, said NEWS BY Lance Jensen,a deputy district attorney in the environmental COMMUNITY crimes unit. The office seeks two deputy prosecutors, two SPORTS investigators and one clerk for the unit. "When [the cases] trickle in,we handle them as best we PREP SPORTS can,"Jensen said. "But when you get a flood of them as a result of a new federal mandate,with our current staff, there's no way BUSINESS we can absorb those in a timely fashion." SO CAL LIVING Federal standards call for upgrading leak-prone,single-wall steel tanks and other equipment, and the deadline for CALENDAR complying passed in December. Prosecuting violators will greatly increase the caseload of the environmental unit, which CALENDAR has two attomeys and one investigator,Jensen said. WEEKEND Service stations and chemical and aerospace companies use HOME DESIGN multiple underground tanks to store waste oils,petroleum products and other chemicals. Altogether there are 2,600 tanks COMMENTARY at 900 storage facilities in the county. T.V.TIMES Of the 900 sites,60 failed to comply with the new requirements, and 23 of them were identified as being the least compliant,according to a county Health Care Agency memo. Prosecutors will work on those 23 cases first,Jensen said. Ground-water contamination has been found from 438 ADVERttSEMEM tanks,but drinking water has not been polluted and there is no immediate health threat,Jensen said. He worries,though,that it could someday reach the aquifers supplying about 70%of the county's drinking water. T�T�Ue .ni ity Jensen said it Is easier to negotiate f nes with defendants J Alliance" http://www.latimes.com/HOMENEWS/ORANGE/iOD0044691.1.htmi 5/18/99 �{ newsome age _ _ ;i m awglstmcosa TNEORANGE coBMY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH california SWEPRAM HOME PAGE TODAY'S NEWS •Front Page Ruling leaves limits on water rights -N Non Ia .Were RCHIVES COURTS: Irrigation districts' efforts to tap into AUTOMOTIVE Callifornia's Central Valley Project are rejected. BUSIN SS FINANCE CLASSCOLUMNS May 18, 1999 COMMUNITY NEWS Y CRIME&COURTS EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAINMENT& The Associated Press TRAVEL FUN&GAMES HEALTH&FITNESS SACRAMENTO—A U.S. Supreme Court ruling rejecting an LIBERTY ONLINE attempt by irrigation districts to tap a stretch of water in LIVING&SHOPPING California's Central Valley Project won praise from POLITIGOVERNMENT environmentalists Monday. REAL ESTATE SCIENCE& TECHNOLOGY The court, without comment, let stand a 1998 ruling that PROMOTIONS & voided some large, long-term water contracts for San Joaquin SPORTS&RECREATION Valley growers and required renegotiation after environmental WEATHER review. "It's a great victory for the environment," said Michael Wall, a lawyer representing the Natural Resources Defense Council, the lead plaintiff. "It will lead to the renegotiating of the water supply contracts after full consideration of the environmental impacts on protected and endangered species." The justices rejected the water districts'arguments that water contracts with the federal government were renewed properly. The dispute involves water from the upper San Joaquin River stored behind the Friant Dam and sold to water districts under long-term contracts since the late 1940s.A stretch of the river below the dam generally is dry. In 1988, the Natural Resources Defense Council and other environmental and fishing groups sued the federal government, saying the government planned to renew the contracts without following U.S. environmental laws. "We're obviously unhappy about the decision," said Greg Wilkinson, an attorney representing the Friant Water Users Authority. "It means if you sign a contract with the government,don't expect the government to defend it if it is attacked." http://www.ocregister.c,om/newstcalifoniia/I8water.shtml 5/18/99 ews �' rte In ex GO �. ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELPV The University . BA Alliance, • CIS Fn ay. i\faN 14, 1991) D.A. Seeks More Aides to Protect Water .Health: Rackauckus urges supervisors to help implement a federal law to clean up underground storage tanks. By RICHARD MAROSI, Times Staff Writer ist.Atty. Tony Rackauckus on Thursday asked county RELATED . supervisors to support a major crackdown on operators of faulty underground storage tanks that pose a long- O.C.SECTIONS term risk to Orange County's ground-water supply. MAIN PAGE County officials stressed that the tanks--many of them leaking chemicals into the ground--don't present an immediate NEWS BY threat to the public. But they said the pollution could COMMUNITY eventually seep into.the aquifers that supply Orange County SPORTS with half its drinking water. "Some ground water has been contaminated,but most of the PREP SPORTS aquifers are much deeper--and are usually protected by a layer of clay," said Denise Fennessy,a program manager with the BUSINESS county Health Care Agency. SO CAL LIVING But she added that the clay protection is not impermeable to contaminants--meaning they could leak through. CALENDAR Under Rackauckus'proposal,his environmental-crimes unit staff would be increased from two to four prosecutors. The CALENDAR number of investigators would increase by two. The upgrades WEEKEND would cost$546,000, and the Board of Supervisors is HOME DESIGN scheduled to take up the request next week. The additional staff would focus on enforcing a federal law COMMENTARY requiring the upgrading of underground tanks and the installation of monitoring systems to detect leaks. The law was T.V.TIMES enacted in December in response to concerns that many older, single-walled tanks seep contaminants into the ground water. With the extra staffing, officials expect to step up prosecutions of tank owners who disobey the law. ADVERTSEMENT Countywide, more than 2,600 tanks are buried at more than 900 facilities, including gasoline stations,chemical and aerospace companies and trucking firms. The tanks store gasoline,waste oils, other petroleum products and chemicals. i About 60 facilities have been cited for failing to comply http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/ORANGE/t000043402.htmi 5/14/99 aws _. - E i n ex -- Ko • ei - - ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELPV 1111j,J J ff 11 f �tour Click here .J_:J -J In see e linual fiur e nes ay, June 9, 1999 LAGUNA BEACH By CHRIS CEBALLOS. (949)248-2150 sewage spill has resulted in the closure of 2,000 feet of Blue Lagoon Beach, including a small portion of RELATED Lagunita Beach. The spill occurred Monday when a O.C.SECTIONS pipeline blockage caused sewage to overflow into a storm drain MAIN PAGE at Blue Lagoon Beach. The beach has been closed to water- sport activities until further notice by the Orange County NEWS BY Health Care Agency. Beach status reports: (714)667-3752. COMMUNITY SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Tunes.All Rights Reserved PREP SPORTS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: BUSINESS BEACHES,SEWAGE SPILLS,COASTAL AREAS—ORANGE COUNTY,HEALTH HAZARDS.You will not be charged to look for SO CAL LIVING stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT Alliance" Looking for a new or used http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000051840.html 6/9/99 at2 news ome age m 1� oC1a91stMA0111111 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SFANOI California HOMEPAGE TODAY'S NEWS 1 Page 2 bills for Newport Bay move -`m".Calgnnia o mia forward •Nation Ymnn ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS&FINANCE June 3, 1999 CLASSIFIED COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME 8 COURTS The Orange County Register EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT SACRAMENTO—Two bills to help protect Newport Bay TRAVRTAINMENTB TRAVEL from environmental damage moved forward in the Legislature HEALTH 8 FERNE55 on Wednesday. LIBERTY ONUNE LIVING&SHOPPING The Assemblyapproved one measure, b Assemblywoman POLITICS& pp y yw0man GOVERNMENT REALLE ESTATE Marilyn Brewer,A-Newport Beach,to spend$330,000 to help SCIENCE& stabilize the East Bluff slopes above the bay:= TECHNOLOGY SERVICES& PROMOTIONS Storms in the winter of 1997-98 caused landslides and erosion, SPORTS&RECREATION threatening the stability of a Newport Beach sewer line. WEATHER The money in Brewer's bill would pay for a drainage system and revegetation of the slopes. The bill now moves to the Senate,which Wednesday approved and sent to the Assembly a bill by Senate Republican Leader Ross Johnson of Irvine to spend $400,000 on dredging of the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Preserve. The bay is continually threatened as sand filters in from upstream faster than the tides can scour it out. 01 newspaper in Oienge Caft.Calffmia Ue . Copyright 1999 The Orange County Register Please seN eanmenla to aoeaisler�Imk.heeEom.eom http://www.ocregister.com/news/califomia/bay003w.shtml 6/3/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register FOUNTAIN VALLEY Rep.Loretta Sanchez,U-Santa Ana,and Felicia Marcus of the Environmental Protec- tion Agency visited the Orange County Water Dis. trict on Friday for a briefing im dairies in the Chino Be- Sin.This area has the high- est density of cows in the nation. If not controlled,the cows'waste could now into the Santa Ana River and af- fect Orange County water, water district officials said. Sanchez and Marcus dis- ptssed strategies for con- trolling the dairy waste.The meeting also including a briefing on the S400 million planned ground-water re- plenishment system. Olivia 11awalawn (714)aasasea PROPOSED PROJECT WILL REPEENISH SOUTHERN CAEIEOHNIA NMI WITH PUHIEIEO WATEH qv William R. Ali&Jr. Geeeml,Nanagn. Omnde Counq Warn Outrun As part of the The best option available to us was also Creating a Mora Competitive and landscape the most cost-effective. innovative and Marketplace in Southern Cali- feasible one.The Groundwater Replenish- Water Factory 21.which was named in forma.Orange went System,a proposed 'pint project the 1970s for is utilization of what was -m County faces a from the Orange County Water District then viewed as"21st century technolo- unique challenge: (OCWD) and the Orange County gies," uses advanced treatment processes, how to continue Saturation District(OCSO),will help including reverse osmosis and carbon providing water meet Orange Comrvs growing demand absorption.Since the Factory went online, for a growing for safe, reliable water by taking highly the districts research and development has population in the treated wastewater and purifving it ro led m manufacturers creating improved years to come. levels that exceed state and federal drink- technologies at lower costs. For example, WJlias R'Wr&A For now.im- ing water standards. the energy required to produce 1.000 gal- ported water from outside Southern lot of water from a reverse osmosis Sys- California has been the answer. In the The Groundwater Replenish- rem is now 116th of what it was in 1475. years ahead,however.Orange County ment system: A source of The overall cost of purchasing R.O. mem- may not be able to buy its way our of the Now, Nigh-Quality Water born are e elements a about 60%has than in problem.Water from both the Colorado Groundwater Replenishment System 1975.And,of course,the technology has River and the Sure Water project is pre. water would be purified through advanced improved dramatically, providing even dicted to become less reliable and far treatment processes, including 100% higher quality water. more expensive. treatment by microfiltration, reverse osmo- Since the Groundwater Replenishment The count vs current water supply is sis and ultraviolet disinfection. The water System will create the largest microfiltra- 60 percent groundwater and 40 percent would be used as a seawater intrusion bar- tion and reverse osmosis project in the imported water. The projected water net and would also be percolated into the United States and create further comperi- demand for the year 2020(for central and groundwater basin to provide more than don among manufacturers,we predict north Orange Couniv),however, is 100.000 acre-firer of new water per vcar. that the efficiency of membrane processes expected to increase to 650,000 acre-feet The resulting water would exceed state will continue to improve, while costs may —compared to current consumption of and federal drinking water standards, continue to drop. about 500,000 acre-fter per year. These including EPA Drinking Water Standards. projections indicate that unless something In addition, die water will be of higher TOS.- An Ongoing Problem for is done,there will be shortages— quality than any other water source avail- Orange CouraW s Water demand will far outweigh supply. able to Orange County. including Groundwater quality In Orange imported water from Northem California County suffers from higher dun desired OCWD Weighs Its Options and the Colorado River.This means that total dissolved solids(TDS)levels. High Faced with the reality of an uncertain this water would actually improve the TDS water causes increased costs to water future.Orange County Water District overall quality of our water supply users. If the salinity is not dealt with,agn- reviewed all of its alternatives. One appar- cultural water users suffer economic lam- ent answer would be to increase the per- Purifving What? age through reduced crop yields,added centage of purchased water. But projections Taking highly treated wastewater and labor costs for irrigation management and and recent events indicate that counting purifving it to almost distilled water star- added drainage requirements.Some waste- on increased purchases of water may not dards may at first sound somewhat exorbi- water recycling projects will have to desak be feasible or wise,since available supply tans, bur it is an area in which OCWD the water prior to in use on salt-sensitive is uncertain.especially during drought has experience. For 25 years. the Districts landscapes. Urban users incur additional conditions. Water Factory 21 has successfully taken eta due to more frequent replacement of Water use efficiency, including highly treated wastewater and purified it plumbing and wamr-using appliances,use installing low-flush toilca in the count vs to drinking water standards to feed 23 of water softeners,or the purchase of bor- homes and businesses,was a possibility, inictrion wells that comprise a seawater dcd water or home water filters. however.we determined a maximum of immition barrier, protecting the country's The Groundwater Replenishment Sys- 30.000 acre-feet per vear would be saved, critical groundwater supply.This water tem will provide higher quality water Though saving this amount of water would eventually blends into the groundwater (lower TDS levels) than other county certainly help our situation, it would not and becomes a pan of Orange Coutryi water sources.This will result in lowering completely solve it.Another option was groundwater supply.This water has con- the overall TDS content of the groundwa. seawater desalination,a costly and sistentiv met or exceeded drinking water ter basin.With die Gmundwamr r� unpractical option at this point in time. standards since is inceprion in 1975. romrnudar prgr 13 J senators uppose betting Aside Funding for the State Revolving Loan Fund Page 1 of I 9.W% fixed APR Svnplified tax rclxwting Detailed hiJling s[aremen[s Join Our TODAY'S NEWS AND ANALYSIS... (*.TOPNEWS CommunityPPII NRPh+u INDUSTRY NEWS 05/25/1999 Rom THE — WmD oxwo MARKETPLACE - NM TEAM Senators Oppose Setting Aside Funding for the State S Revolving Loan Fund A.� SUPPLIER TvMYa NEWS & Senate Environment & Public Works Committee Chairman John FIRMS AND FACES ANALYSIS Chafee (R-RI) and a bipartisan group of Senate lawmakers are ,CASE STUDIES Front Pau e urging congressional appropriators to reject President Clinton's 3 News fiscal year 2000 budget proposal to use water quality , FEATURE ARTICLES Month in infrastructure funds to reduce non-point source pollution and 3 Review improve estuary management. Chief among the lawmakers' .OVER THE NE MTN ux 'j Archive concerns is the fact that the proposal would amend the Clean um Water Act (CWA) through the budget process. . REGULATORY AND PRODUCTS LEGISLATIVE ISSUES Showcase Chafee and a host of Senate Democrats and Republicans — including Sens.Daniel Moynihan (D-NY), Robert Bennett (R-UT), uNDER THE LEGAL Editors Choice and George Voinovich (R-OH) - - recently wrote to Senate VA, SPIGOT BY DAMEL Literature HUD, & Independent Agencies Subcommittee Chairman UCERA Reviews Christopher"Kit" Bond (R-MO) April 28, arguing that Clinton's , ENVIRONMENTAL PAGE f search proposal 'Would modify a key title" of the CWA and ask Bond to ONE NEWS reject the measure. COMMUNITY , GLOBAL NEWSWIRE }Live chat In February Clinton proposed a $7.2 billion FY00 budget for SSIMMAR 3 Discussion EPA that included a plan to put aside up to 20% of the state EXHISMON t Forums revolving loan fund (SRF) capitalization grants. SRF grants are CONFERENCE NEWS }Events Calendar used primarily to construct or upgrade wastewater treatment About This Site plants, for grants to curb non-point source pollution or to 3 Feedback improve estuary water quality. 3 Join the Community Calling the SRF "one of the most successful programs ever established for protecting the environment," the senators point SITE MAP out that the Clinton proposal "would create a $160 million dollar grant program within the loan program that would deplete the RESOURCES corpus of state funds." 7 Buyers Guide According to the lawmakers, "non-point source pollution and DownloadSoftw estuary management projects are already funded through a Industry ndust $200 million grant program" according to CWA Section 319.Associations 'The appropriate mechanism for increasing funding for non-point source pollution control and estuary management projects is http://news.wateronline.com/industry-news/19990528-3389.html 6l3/9 ntnLx watch tiomepage Page 1 of 1 : EPA TML Orr1OL Or Office of Water 6OIeNcE / o TEONNOLOGY BEACH Watcf `s ., 1999 Update Beach Program Overview iy EPA Beach Reports: d References frequently Asked Questions TMeetings 6 Events a Beach Links Contact EPA _ � { An EMPACT Project Beach Badb oers' Local Action 'Y 96 Beach :; Plan uide Information CONTACTEPA 105THONE IEPAHOME IHATER HOME siwt U.S Eenrwn�enl�1 Prwenion Aeeery,O?erN'na+.O?al Siieeie W TNbmlog Re April 13.IM URL:bnP/hrww.ePAber/OSf/beerbv/ http://w .epa.gov/ost/beachest 6/4/1999 does not include all U.S. beaches. Only the beaches whose monitoring officials responded to EPA's survey are included. EPA intends to conduct this survey each year and as new information becomes available it will be added to the BEACH Watch web site. Next year EPA hopes to add more freshwater beaches to the survey. Also available on the BEACH Watch web site is the modeling report,"Review of Potential Modeling Tools and Approaches to Support the BEACH Program,"which summarizes the predictive tools used by local beach-water-quality monitoring officials to determine if a health advisory or beach closure is needed. Current methods of water quality testing take several hours to determine if a health risk exists at a particular beach. These and other EPA models are being evaluated to determine their applicability to real-time prediction of pathogen concentrations in the water at local beaches. Both the 1999 survey and the modeling report were conducted under the President's Clean Water Action Plan announced in 1998 and EPA's Beach Action Plan, released this April. Browner's 1997 BEACH initiative established an accelerated program to help slates ensure public health and safely at beaches and other recreational waters. EPA is helping states set recreational water quality standards, based on established EPA criteria, as well as helping states provide better monitoring at these locations, through improved and more timely detection methods. EPA continues to fund research and provide technical support to slates to help ensure safer recreational waters. R-56 ### 2 BIOSOLIDS By BBIAN TELLY Contributing Writer For many, there couldn't be beer without biosolids. John "Arlie"Huffman stands on a butte outside Sunnyside, overlooking hundreds of acres owned by Natural Selection Farms. The farm, owned by the Newhouse family, is a biosolids dumping ground And Huffman couldn't he happier. Others, though, on this side of the Cascades in the Snoqualmie Valley, have raised concern about the proposed use of composted biosolids on Grouse Ridge in the years to come. Cadman Inc. is planning to locate a 317-acre gravel mine on the land east of North Bend, and use biosolids to restore the property after mining is complete. Biosolids, however, has become a lightening rod issue for opponents of the mining project, who say the material may pose health hazards to people who live downstream or downwind of the application sites. In this second part of a two-part series, the Valley Record looks at the "biosolid boogeyman"and the use of biosolids on agriculture land in Fastenr Washington. "Every community produces biosolids," said Peter Machno, manager of King County's biosolids program. "In fact, the cleaner we get our water, the more biosolids we produce." King County produces 40 percent to 50 percent of the state's biosolids; about 190 million gallons of wastewater is treated every day to create 72 tons of the stuff. Biosolids have been used on farmland since the early 1990s; it has been used on timberland since the 1980s. Here at the Green Valley project, near Sunnyside in Yakima County, more than 25,000 tons of biosolids are used every year to fertilize grapes, corn and other edibles. And hops, used to make beer throughout the United States and the world. Indeed, wastewater treatment has come a long way since the days when sewage found its way not to farms but the watery world bordering Western Washington. More than 20 years ago, increased regulations covering wastewater discharge led to an intensive assessment of the county's treatment system and what to do with the leftover waste. "At the point that they actually stopped discharging it into Puget Sound,the county was then faced with ... 'Well, what do we do with the product?"' recalled Mark Lucas, the county manager for the Green Valley project. "Primarily we use it for nitrogen,to find out what the nitrogen value of the soil is. Hops are a high nitrogen user. Depending on the variety of the hops, we'll use either 225 to 290 pounds of nitrogen per growing season. "It gives us a picture of the whole field. It lets us keep track of the field and what we're doing," Huffman explained. "In the old days, when they were raising hops or any other kind of crops, they'd get the manure spreader out and throw 30 ton of wet manure on the field and say, 'Well, that's good.'The next year, maybe they only need 15 or 20, but they'd still throw 30 ton of wet manure out there because they want to make sure they're safe. We've gone from that to actually analyzing our soil prior to every growing season so we know what we've got in the soil." A soil consultant studies the makeup of the soil and then prepares a report that takes into account the crop, soil type, plant needs, and amount of nitrogen left in soil. The study is also sent to the Yakima Health District for review. "And they have to approve this recommendation before we can go ahead and apply the nitrogen," Huffman said. "The weather will still throw a monkey wrench," he added. "This past year is a prime example. We had some very hot weather, and the plants stopped growing. And so consequently, they didn't use the amount of nitrogen that was projected. "Of course, we caught that, so fields where we thought we probably would be applying biosolids, we are either applying at a reduced rate or not applying at all. We have a lot of fields this year where we're not applying." Machno, the manager of the biosolids program, said the county doesn't assume it has learned everything there is to know about biosolids. About $130,000 a year is spent on research and demonstration projects. "There's always some little question that's being asked," Machno said. "We've had University of Washington over here for three or four years with various projects, studying biosolids, the mineralization of biosolids, the volatilization factor,"Huffman added. "This program has taught us a lot. It's taught us to manage our soils, rather than throwing seed and fertilizer out there and saying, 'Hev, it's harvest time,'two months down the road, 'Let's go fishing now.' We don't do that. We're on top of it all the time." Biosolids are used on about 850 acres of hops fields at Natural Selection Farms;the company also oversees biosolids use on a total of 1,500 acres, some of the land owned by other farmers. "We apply biosolids on the neighboring hop fields, too,it's not just ours," Huffman explained. Involving nearby farmers in the project was a good move, he added "If they're involved in it,they're not complaining about it. As you know,with biosolids, you have to get past the public perception." Set text in columns then pull down box to surround Where do biosolids come from? Water used in homes, businesses and industries becomes wastewater, which flows through King County's sewer lines—there's 255 miles of sewage pipes— to one of two wastewater treatment plants, at Renton or West Point. (Sewage from septic systems is pumped into private, commercial tanker trucks and taken to the Renton facility.) The Renton treatment plant processes waste from the east side of Lake Washington—a 140- mile area that stretches from south King County to south Snohomish County—or about 115 million gallons a day. When wastewater arrives at the treatment plant, it receives preliminary, primary and secondary treatment. Preliminary treatment occurs when plastic and other material that has been washed down sinks or flushed in toilets is filtered out. Debris—anything about 3/8-inch in size or larger, like condoms or tampons— is caught on the bar screen. Grit is also taken out before primary treatment begins, where most solid material is removed by gravity as it settles; floating material is skimmed from the wastewater. Wastewater then flows into a secondary treatment system where oxygen-using micro-organisms eat suspended and dissolved organic particles and reproduce to create more micro-organisms. Clarifiers help separate the thickening mass from the liquids, and organisms continue to eat the solids as the treatment process further stabilizes the mixture. Finally, the solid by-products are dewatered and form a cake-like substance now called "biosolids." The biosolids are then loaded into trucks and removed from the treatment plant for use on forestry land or farms, or further composted for more general use. Treated biosolids are labeled Class A or Class B, depending on the amount of treatment. Pathogens—living organisms such as viruses that cause disease—are removed from all Class A biosolids. Class B biosolids still contain some pathogens, but experts say most of these organisms soon die after being exposed to light and air. King County produces about 72 tons of biosolids every day. Biosolids contain heavy metals, which has led to most of the controversy over the use of biosolids in past years. Currently, most heavy metals don't make it into the waste stream as industrial pretreatment programs have been put into place in recent years. Trace levels of metals in King County biosolids fall below allowable limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency; locally produced biosolids have been labeled "exceptional quality." Still, biosolids continue to be the focus of controversy. ews - ao ie naex - co . lay 4r - ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP Tues a�T1,19T99 COSTA MESA By STACY BROWN, (949)574-4268 he Mesa Consolidated Water District board unanimously RELATED approved a$16.5-million budget last week for fiscal year 1999-2000. An estimated$5.27 million will go to O.C.SECTIONS expenses related to the total water supply,which includes the MAIN PAGE well production of clear and colored water. "Mesa is the only place in Orange County where colored NEWS BY water is used," said spokeswoman Lynnette Round. "So we COMMUNITY needed money for the building and design of a colored water SPORTS treatment facility." Round said colored water,which is higher quality than clear PREP SPORTS water, is found at about 1,000 feet below the ground basin. In the 1998-99 budget, which totaled $15.80 million,operating BUSINESS expenses for the total water supply were about$5 million. The SO CAL LIVING board has projected financial obligations--or nonoperating expenses--to be $1.81 million,down from last year's total of CALENDAR $1.89 million. CALENDAR Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved WEEKEND HOME DESIGN O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: COMMENTARY MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT COSTA MESA(CA)— GOVERNMENT--BUDGET,UTILITIES—ORANGE COUNTY.You T.V.TIMES will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ADVERTISEMENT Ahdgues,;� i� Srid ., http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000049122.htlnl 6/1/99 News , �o i e n ex - co • �� 9 . ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP Thursday, May 71999 ANAHEIM By CRYSTAL CARREON, (714)966-7835 taxicab owner has initiated a recall campaign against RELATED Councilwoman Shirley McCracken in the wake of the City Council's vote last week to impose a temporary O.C.SECTIONS moratorium on new taxi permits. South Coast Cab Co. owner MAIN PAGE Sawas Roditis has repeatedly applied for a permit to operate in the city,but council members, led by McCracken, instead NEWS BY voted to form a committee to study the taxicab issue. Roditis COMMUNITY said McCracken is violating her campaign promises to be more SPORTS business-friendly. McCracken said Wednesday that she is surprised by the PREP SPORTS recall effort, but defended her position. She said she isn't convinced of the "need or necessity" for more taxi service in BUSINESS the city. She added that the situation between officials and SO CAL LIVING Roditis is complicated by his pending lawsuits over the permit issue. CALENDAR CALENDAR Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved WEEKEND Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: HOME DESIGN RECALL ELECTIONS,ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL.You will not be COMMENTARY charged to look for stories,only m retrieve one. T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT Alliance" r http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000047583.html 5/27/99 ews - Ei ie n ex =co �711119!ZL-KSWIIA ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP) urs ay, ay J�1999 HUNTINGTON BEACH By ERON BEN-YEHUDA, (714)965-7177, =. 13 hree beaches closed last week because of a 6,000-gallon RELATED 13 sewage spill have been reopened. Orange County health O.C. SECTIONS officials prohibited swimming near Peter's Landing, Sunset Aquatic Park and Portofino Circle after a pipeline under NEWS BY an apartment complex in Stanton broke and leaked sewage into COMMUNITY a storm drain that runs into the Bolsa Chica channel, said Alyce Mastnanni, director of quality management and planning at the SPORTS Orange County Health Care Agency. Officials detected the PREP SPORTS spill May 17, and no one was permitted in the water until testing showed acceptable levels of contaminants, she said. BUSINESS LIFE&STYLE Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved CALENDAR b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: CALENDAR BEACHES—ORANGE COUNTY SEWAGE SPILLS.You will not be WEEKEND charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES AMIRMSEMENr t t . JJY Niversity Alliance'- http://www.latimes.cam/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/OCNE W S/t000047593.htm1 5/27/99 ews ,J ienex _ mac • /� - ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP` Customized rates M .. 90c) D�0over the Internet. Fixed Rate y� Tues ay, May 25, 1999 ORANGE By ALUSON COHEN, (714)966-5835 he Orange County Water District announced Monday RELATED that a recent study has concluded that Santa Ana River O.C. SECTIONS water from Anaheim can be transported through underground pipelines to Santiago Creek in Orange to help NEWS BY replenish the ground-water basin that supplies 75%of the COMMUNITY county's water. Authorities estimate the extra Water—which otherwise would have run off into the ocean--will save about SPORTS S750,000 a year for 15,000 county residents. Additionally, PREP SPORTS officials said the study indicates the water will lessen dependencies on supplies from Northern California and the BUSINESS Colorado River. An implementation date has not been determined. LIFE&STYLE CALENDAR Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved CALENDAR b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: WEEKEND WATER—ORANGE COIINTY,ORANGE COUNTY WATER HOME DESIGN DISTRICT. You will no[be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT News t t WUniversity Alliance" http://www.lati mes.com/HO ME/NEWS/GRAN GE/OCNE W S/t000046908.html 5/25/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register IRVINE Trial dates were set Friday for four defendants charged with stealing from the Irvine Ranch Water District. Wayne Smith,a former con- tracts administrator for the water district,and three contractors,J. Randall Is- .may,Robert Casey and - Robert Rader,will appear in Department 45 of Santa Ma Superior Court for a pretrial hearing Sept. 3 and jury tri- al Oct 4.The four allegedly stole S2.2 million from the water district in a three- year rebate action. Laura Corbin mq%540% Water replenishment system a tough concept to swallow A s you may know I have coffee grinds and you don't want been a somewhat to know what else. skeptical cynic about the Hydrogen peroxide is then Orange County ,' added to control odors.reduce Sanitation District's proposed sulfides,and enhance the Groundwater Replenishment primary settling process.Next System, it's on to the primary treatment The GRS is a creative and bold process where liquids and solids plan to take treated wastewater, are separated.Coagulants are send it on up to Anaheim.and let added to aid in the settling it settle into the water table, process. There are those among us who - gill Borden Secondary treatment follows are more than a little queasy where microorganisms,activated about treating toilet water and AS I SEE IT sludge,consume the remaining making it available as drinking organic solids. water. Solids removed in the various My conversations with three I had this dream that we could treatment stages are processed local leaders and tours of the follow Santa Barbara and build a and recycled for use as soil sanitation and water plants have amendments,compost or alleviated my initial desalination plant to meet our fertilizer.And the methane gas needs.Wes explained that the apprehensions. cost would be prohibitive to derived from this process is used First I met with Huntington as the energy source to operate serve all of Orange Coanty. Beach Mayor Peter Green.Dr. Additionally.the proposed GRS the treatment plants.The facility Green,a biologist,reminded me treated wastewater would be generates so much energy that of my Biology 101 class in which cleaner and better suited for the excess is sold to Edison. I learned that the entire world is water table infusion. The treated liquids go on to be a tightly enclosed atmospheric used in industry,landscape sphere,which continuously My final meeting war with Fountain Valley Mayor John irrigation,and as a seawater recycles the same water,That intrusion barrier.What's left water coming out of the tap today Collins at the Sanitation Plant. over goes into the ocean and this Here's n ofwh h unscientific was perhaps Bowing in the Tiber explanation of what happens is the autfall with which the when Rome burned.All water there.The bad stair,243 million district proposes to replenish our recycles in nature. gallons per day,is Bushed down ground water. Former Huntington Beach our toilets and into 825 miles of em lerdw4 ns I See h column is a Mayor and Sanitation District big pipes that take it to the plant. regular feature of The Fountain Valley Supervisor Wes Bannister and 1 First the fluid is passed through Views sister publication,The had coffee at the Sugar Shack bar screens that trap big stuff Huntington Beach We".You can and he advised that in not too like bowling balls,egg shells, e-mail him at WfBorden@aolnom many more years the county _ would be facing a water crisis unless we act now to avert it.He explained the options and none, other than the Ground Water Replenishment System,is economically feasible. Woodside, Frankie From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 4:45 PM To: McIntyre, Donald; Woodside, Frankie Subject: FW: OCSD Energy/Cost Savings for Edison Envest Project Don Board letter item Blake ---0riginal Message— From: could,Robed Sent: Tuesday,May 18. 19994:19 PM To: Anderson Blake Subject: FW:OCSti Energy/Cost Savings for Edison Envest Project Blake the Electric Utility Energy consevation data that I mentioned is noted below —Original Message— From: Millea,Kathleen Sant: Monday,May 17. 19994:26 PM To: O iten,Robed;Halverson.David(O&M) Subject: FW:OCSD Energy/Cost Savings for Edison Envest Project —Original Message— From: Martinez,Mark S Ima'" RTINMSA,oe rnmj Sent: Wednesday,May 12. 1999 5:53 PM To: 'Millea,Kathy(OCSD)' Cc: Martinez,Mark S Subject OCSD Energy/Cost Savings According the construction and financial records of Southern California Edison, the Orange County Sanitation District energy-etfciency project has completed iYs first year of energy savings as of the last quarter of 1998. The estimated savings were approximately 900,000 kWhs of electricity over a 12 moth period. This equates to 9 million kWhs of energy saved over the life of the project(10 years), based on existing operations. The project cost, including an$82,000 co-investment from SCE,was$375,000.This covered the installation of controls and sensors for High-Intensity Discharge lighting systems throughout the OCSD Plants 1 and 2. The sensors dim the lights almost imperceptibly during non-occupied times, yet achieve substantial energy savings from the reduced consumption. The entrance of plant personnel in the area activates the lighting to full brightness,and they remain in that mode as long as workers are in the area. Departure of personnel activates the lighting systems back to their energy- saving mode. Using a 4 cents per kWh annual average rate, the savings benefit to the OCSD is$36,000 a year. This will result in a 10.4 year simple payback, not taking into consideration changes in rates of net present values. Other average rates and annual savings are shown below: AVERAGE RATE ANNUAL SAVINGS PAYBACK $0.03/kWh $27,000 13.9 yrs $0.04/kWh $36,000 10.4 yrs $0.05/kWh $45,000 8.3 yrs $0.06/kWh $54,000 6.9 yrs $0.07/kWh $63,000 5.9 yrs $0.08/kWh $72,000 5.2 yrs Tyypical average annual rates in the commercial/industrial sector for lighting projects in SCE's territory are$0.065 to $0.080/kWh. The annual energy Savings of 900,000 kWhs is the equivalent of reducing carbon dioxide emissions(CO2) by over 10 million pounds a year. Over the life of the pro'ect, over 100 million pounds of carbon dioxide will be removed from the atmosphere as a result of OCSD's energy eZiency efforts. The local environmental impact of this project is in the reduction of CO2 emissions. Since trees in the community absorb CO2 from the atmosphere,the OCSD savings are the equivalent of having nearly 16,000 large,full grown, evergreen trees living in Orange County for ten years. The average adult individual is responsible for generating 20,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year through energy usage, travel, and trash disposal. By implementing the energy efficiency project and reducing CO2(a global warming gas),the OCSD is mitigating the global warming impacts from 5 000 average residents in SouMem Calilomia. 1 1998 Peak Performance Award Winners to be Honored of Policy Forum AMSNs Peak Performance Awards Metropolitan Council Environmental Union Sanitary District, Calif. program recognizes AMSA Services,Minn. Raymond A.Binge Wastewater member agency facilities for excellence Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Facility in wastewater treatment as measured by their compliance with their National Atlantic County UtilitiesAuthorlty,N.J. South East Regional Reclamation Pollutant Discharge EliminationSystem Atlantic County Utilities Authority AuthoritgCalif. (NPDES)permits. There are three types SERRA Ocean Outfall of awards within the Peak Performance Mount Pleasant Waterworks,S.C. Awards program—Silver Awards Rye Range Road Wastewater a Orange County Sanitation,Calif recognize facilities that have received no Treatment Facility Reclamation Plant lial and Treatment more than five NPDES permit violations Trinity RiverAuthority,Texas Plant No.1 over the past calendar year; Gold Central Regional Wastewater System County Sanitation Districts Awards honor treatment works that have of Los Angles County,Calif. achieved 100 percent compliance with City ofHoustenj"as Joint Water Pollution Control Plant their NPDES permit for an entire calen- Almada Sims Wastewater Treatment Plant Son Jose Creek West Water der year; and Platinum Awards pay Southeast Wastewater Treatment Plant Reclamation Plant special tribute to member agency Upper Brays Wastewater Treatment Plant Whinier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant facilities that have received Gold Awards from 1994-1997 CityofAusdn,Texas Colton/San Bernardino Regional Gavotte Wastewater Treatment Plant IT&WRA,Calif. Walrmr Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Rapid lnfiltration/Exlraction Facility ' Sell Lake Corporation,Utah �� y rPo City ofSaa Diego,Calif. PER \ CE Salt lake City Water Reclamation Plant North City Water Reclamation Plant Record Number of Facilities to City of Riverside,Calif. Receive AMSA's Gold Award Riverside Regional Water Quality Since, 1986,AMSA has been presenting Control P/ant 13 Member Facilities to Receive GOIdAwards to member agency facilities Platinum Awards that consistently meet all NPDES permit City of Los Angeles,Calif limits during a calendar year. This year, Hyperion Plant Thirteen memberagency facilities will be 163 AMSA member agency facilities are awarded Platinum Peak Performance being recognized for their outstanding City and County of San Francisco,Public Awards at a special awards ceremonyCalif performance throughout the 1998 calendar Utilities Commission,Cali during AMSA's /999 National Environ- Oceanside Water Pollution Con year—a record number of recipients. Control Plant mental Policy Forum & 291h Annual AMSA is proud m honor the following Meeting in Washington,DC,May 22-26. p 8 Central Conks Costa Sanitary The facilities'outstanding performance member agencies. District,Calif. earned them five GO1dAWards from 1994- Central Canna Costa Sanitary District 1997,and this year the facilities will be Municipality ofAnchorage Utility,Alaska Treatment Plant awarded AMSA's prestigious Platinum Eagle River Wastewater Facility Atrard. AMSA congratulates the Jefferson County+Ala. Metr District,. rerRedemedas rW Colo. following 1998 Platinum Award winners: Norman R. Skinner Wastewater Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Treatment Plant City of San Diego,Calif. Cityof Puebla Colo. E.W.Blom Point Loma Metropolitan Little Rock Wastewater Utility,Ark. City of Pueblo Wastewater Treatment Plant Wastewater Treatment Plant Adams Field Wostewaler Treatment Plant Fourche Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant City of Greeley,Colo. North Shore Sanitary District,Ili Greeley Water Pollution Control Facility Clovey Road Selvage Treatment Plant West County Wastewater District,Calif. �iashington Suburban Sanitary Wul County Wastewater District Water Pollution Control Plant Commission,Md. Desrem Branch Wanewmer Treatment Plata w ♦ Continued on Page 7 w From Page 7, Peak Performance Awards Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Trinity River Authority,Texas Central Valley Water Reclamation District,Ohio Denton Creek Wastewater System Facility,Utah Easterly Wastewater Treament Plant Red Oak Creek Wastewater System Central Palley Water Reclamation Facility Southerly Wasrewater Treatment Plant Ten Mile Creek Regimen( Wastewaaer System Hampton Roads Sanitation District,Vs. Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Sao Antonio Water System,Texas Army Base Sewage Treatment Plant Cinchmatk Ohio Dos Rios Water Recycling Center Atlantic Sewage Treatment Plant Taylor Creek Treatment Plant Leon Creek Water Recycling Center Boat Harbor Sewage Treatment Plant Medlo Creek Water Recycling Center James River Sewage Treatment Plant CltyofDaytoq Ohio Salado Creek Water Recycling Center Nansemond Sewage Treatment Plant Dayton Advanced Wastewater ltrgin t,Initial"Sewage Treamunt Plant Treatment Plant Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority,Taxes Williamsburg Sewage Treatment Plant 40-Acre Wastewater Treatment Plant York River Sewage Treatment Plant City of Columbus,Ohio Blackhawk Regional Wastewater Jackson Pike Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Plant County ofStalford,Va Southerly Wastewater 7leannow Plain Fort Worth Water Deparos ent,Texas Little Falls Run Wastewater City of Oklahoma City,Okla. Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Facility Chilsom Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant El County ofFahiax,Va. B South Canadian Wastewater Paso Water Utilities Public ServiceNamara M Cole,Jr. Pollution Control Plant Treatment Plant oard,Teaas Deer Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Roberto B. Buriamante Street Wastewater City of Richmond Va, Treatment Plant Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant Unified Sewerage Agency,Ore. Chyal Housfonjerfas Forest Grow Facility Chesterfield County,Va. Hillsboro Wastewater Treatment Facility Clinton Park Wastewater Treatment Plant Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Durham Wastewater Treatment FacWry Easthaven Wastewater Treatment Plant Greenridge Wastewater 7Yeatment Plant Alexandria SanitationAuthodty,Va City of Salem Oregon Imperial Palley Wastewater Treatment Plant Alexandria Sanitation Authority Willow Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant Mena Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Advanced Waste Treatment Plant Northbel( Wastewater Treatment Plant City of Eugene,Ore. Northgate Wastewater Treatment Plan( King County Wastewater Treatment Eugene/Springfield Water Pollution Park Ten Wastewater Treatment Plant Division,Wash. Control Facility Sagemom Wastewater Treatment Plant West Point Treatment Plant Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant Renton Treatment Plan( City of Corvallis,Ore. Turkey Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant City ofTawm Wash. Corvallis Wastewater Reclamation Plant WCID-/Il Wastewater Treatment Plan( North End Plant a Philadelphia Water Department,Pa City of Dallas Water Utilities,Texas Northeast Water Pollution Control Plant Soutirside Wastewater Treatment Pant City ofLynnwood,Wash. Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Facility Southwest Water Pollution Control Plant Racine Water and Wastewater Utility,Wis. City of Corpus Christi Wastewater ty+ ABegbanyCounty ,Sanitary Authority,Pa Deparhneat,Texas Racine Wastewater Treatment Plain Allegheny Counry Sanitary Authority Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Wastewater Treatment Plant Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant District.Wis. Laguna Madre Wastewater Treatment Plant Jones Island Wastewater Treatment Plant SpartaoburgSanitary Sewer District,S.C. Oro Wastewater Treatment Plant South Share Wastewater Treatment Plant Lawson Fork Wastewater Treatment Plant Whitecap Wastewater Trentmein Plant Metropolitan Government ofNashville City ofAustin,Texas Green Bay Metropolitan SewerageDistrict,Wis. and Davidson County,Tenn. South Austin Regional Wastewater Green Bay Metrpofitan Sewerage DistrictWhites Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Plant ♦ Continued on Page 9 0 Federal Report Links 'Dead Zone' to Agricultural Runoff MSA is reviewing recently released reducing nutrient loads; evaluating River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nulri- r reports on nutrient loadings in the methods for reducing nutrients; and ent Task Force. The CENR must then Mississippi Basin because they lay evaluating the costs and benefits of report its recommendations to Congress important groundwork for the comprehen- reducing nutrient loads. Comments on by May 2000. live control of nonpoint source pollution the reports are due Aug.2, 1999. from crops and pastures, the leading cause The reports find that the most feasible of water quality impairment in the country. AMSA to Submit Comments approach to reducing nitrogen in the The six reports were compiled by the AMSA plans to submit comments on the basin is to reduce the over-application White House's Hypoxia Working Group, report after discussion and review by of commercial fertilizers. This approach, which has spent the last 18 months the Water Quality Committee. The combined with targeted wetlands researching the causes of the Gulf of reports are available online via EPA's restoration would cost-effectively Mexico's"dead zone"and the costs and web site at www.epa.gov/msbasin achieve a 20 percent reduction in benefits of addressing the problem. nutrient loadings in the basin. The Based on the reports and comments, the reports also discuss poidt/donpoint The six reports contain information on the National Oceanic&Atmospheric trading and demonstrate that municipal characterization ofhypoxia;the ecological Administration will compile an inte- sources account for less than 5 percent and economic consequences of hypoxia; grated assessment for the White House of nutrients in the Mississippi Basin. ■ the sources of nutrients in the Missis- Committee on Environment and Natural sippi Basin;the water quality effects of Resources(CENR)and the Mississippi From Page 9, Peak Performance Awards Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Mount Pleasant Waterworks,S.C. El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Cincinnad,Ohio Center Street Wastewaer Treament Facility Board,Texas Little Miami Treatment Plant Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant Western Carolina Regional Sewer Haskell R. Street Wastewater Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Authority,S.C. 7heatment Plant District,Ohio Taylors Plant Westerly Wastewater Treatment Plant Arlington County Department City of Johnson City,Tenn. of Environmental Services,Va. City ofOklahoma City,Okla. Johnson City Brush Creek Wotewater Arlington County irrginia Water North Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant Pollution Control Plant Treatment Plant Metropolitan Governmentol'Nashvine Chesterfield County,Va. City of Gresham,Ore. and Davidson County,Tenn. Proctors Creek Waaessvfer Treatment Plant Gresham Wastewater Treatment Plant Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Hampton Roads Sanitation District,Va. Clackamas County Water Environment Chesapeake-Elizabeth Sewage Services,Ore. City of Houston,Texas Treatment Plant Kellogg Creek Water Pollution Beltway Wastewater Treatment Plant Control Plant Homestead Wastewater Treatment Plant Heerlen County WastewaterTireatment Tri-City Water Pollution Control Plant Intercontinental Airport Wastewater Fadlity,Va. Treatment Plant Henrico County Wastewater Oak Lodge Sanitary District,Ore. Keegan Bayou Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Facility Oak Lodge Sanitary District Wastewater WCID-47 Treatment Plant Northbomugh Wastewater Treatment Plant City of Tacoma,Wash. Unified Sewerage Agency,Ore. Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant Central Wastewater Plant #1 Rock Creek Wastewater Treatment FacilityWest District Wastewater Treatment Plant White Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant Lakehaven Utility District,Wash. City of PordandOre. Chocolate Bayou Wastewater Laborer Wastewater Treatment Facility ■ Tryon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant Treatment Plant FWSD-23 Wastewater Treatment Plant Commissioners of Public Works, Sims Bayou South Wastewater Charleston,S.C. Treatment Plant Plum Island Wastewarer Treatment Plant BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ong oMe TO Bd.aDir. 06/23/99 AGENDA REPORT em NumEe IWn Number s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Nominations and election of Chair (effective July 1, 1999) (2) Nominations and election of Vice Chair (effective July 1, 1999) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedure, nominations and election of the Chair shall take place at the June regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted immediately following the election of the Chair. For the Directors information, included below is an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedure relative to the election of the Chair and vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District: "Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1 st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically M!^9� M�AM %IM% MAW IiK7d�5E¢ r,,,,,,,.. v Page 1 4 succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one- year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Statement of Qualifications—Jan Debay Statement of Qualifications— Peer Swan H 1,d..,nd.�,d POenEa R11.11M Q Wftnd.Re,.WR3J 5d¢ R—. . Page 2 June 16, 1998 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Dear Fellow Board Members: As you know, during our June 23 Board meeting you will be voting for Chair and gh..e: Vice Chair for the 1999-2000 term. It has been my privilege to serve as your 1714)952-2411 Chair since November 1998 and, with your continued support, I would like to return in that capacity during the coming year. ,wine,.id...: Pa Boa 8127 Having been elected to this position only seven months ago upon the departure Fountain whey,oA 9 P Y 9 P P 92728.8127 of former Chair Burnie Dunlap, I believe there is still much more I can contribute .trese addr...: to this organization as Chair. And, with so many critical issues and important 10844 She Avenu. decisions still before us, I finely believe that continuity of leadership is vital at �Ucmn w°B,Ci' this time. 92708-7018 For example, the Steering Committee, which I chair, recently began addressing organizational issues in preparation of General Manager Don McIntyre's departure in May 2000. 1 would like to remain involved in that effort as the pot;°;; Committee develops for your approval a succession plan that will keep the • Sanitation District on its course of continued operational and financial Miss excellence. Ansh.i,n And, the Strategic Plan, an effort that began three years ago, is now in its final Buena Perk phase. As a member of the Ad Hoc Strategic Plan Committee, I would like to Gyar sa continue working closely with other Committee members and staff as we carry F°° `°i" Valley P l forward the plan and begin implementation of an aggressive capital Gordon crave improvement program. Huntington Beech Irvine Le Habre It has been my honor to serve on the Sanitation District Board of Directors since Le Palm. 1993. During that time, the agency has experienced significant change and, Los Alemitca Newport Beach with a new Strategic Plan and a soon-to-be new general manager, more change orange lies ahead. I believe one of the most important responsibilities of a Chair, Placentia An. especially during times of change, is to be a strop leader, singularly focused on sale Ana P Y 9 9 9 9 Y Beef Beach our agency's primary goal: to maintain our status as a recognized leader in the Stanton Tueen wastewater industry. Ville Park yorbe Lind. Again, 1 want to personally thank you for the trust and confidence you have County of orange shown me during the past seven months and promise that I will continue representing you and the District to the best of my ability. sanitary Districts S Cost.Mo. incerely, Midway Ciry � v Weser Districts a, 'may Irvine Pench a{— Jan Debay Chair 'To Protect the Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Wastewater systems' To: Fellow Members of the Board of OCSD It has been my hope that this year I could ask for your support to be the Chairman of the Board of Directors of OCSD but I now understand that Jan Debay would like to serve a second term as chairman. I am therefore asking for your continued support as your Vice-Chairman. In the thirteen and a half years that I have served on this Board I have worked hard to improve the organization and equally hard to minimize its cost to the tax and rate payers. I attach a summary of my OCSD board experience and accomplishments as well as a summary of my related work in both the public and private sector for your review and consideration. We have come a long way since those painful days in the early 1990's when the District was the subject of several months of critical front-page stories in the OC Register. As a result, a number of Directors banded together to change the organization, to insure that as Directors we were better informed and involved in policy, strategic planning and most importantly, oversight. We recruited a new general manager from outside the district to engineer that change in direction. With the encouragement of the Board, he has revitalized the management team by restructuring the organization and by recruiting his own management team. Since that time, our total number of employees has been reduced from about 640 to the 507 without a noticeable loss in efficiency. Our capital spending plans have been reevaluated and revamped in such a manner as to reduce the total planned outlay of funds, valued in 1998 dollars, below that of the previous strategic plan valued in 1987 dollars! During the same time, the operational cost of treating a million gallons has dropped from nearly $600 to $488. We should all be proud of the obvious benefit to the tax and rate payers of these significant increases in productivity. In addition, during this time, we have scheduled a series of workshops so that all of the directors, especially those newly appointed, can be kept involved and informed. Furthermore, a cross section of the public has been brought into much of this change through the Rate Advisory and Planning Advisory Committees. It is my hope that together we can continue this process of increasing productivity, communication, and accountability. Thank you for your continued support. Peer Swan Peer A.Swan Director,OCSD 1986 to present-13 %years Chairman Sanitation District#14-5 %years Member Fiscal Policy Committee(now FAHR)- 11 years Vice Chaimmn OCSD of Vice Joint Chairman -5 years Member Steering Committee or Executive Committee-10 years Representative to the Groundwater Replenishment System -2 years Alternative Representative COG and before that RAPSE-5 years Member Building Committee-2 years Member Personnel Committee-2 years Accomplishments • Advocated use of Variable Rate Daft-estimated savings$40 million • Advocated pledging 1%Tax Revenue for debt service-estimated savings$65 million • Advocated reduction of workforce-estimated savings to dam-about$10 million • Advocated outside management of fonds-estimated gain-about$12 million • Assisted in the development of the current Committee system to increase Director imvolment • Assisted in development of current Committee responsibilities • Advocated investigation of alternatives to building a new outfall which led to the GWRS program and the new Strategic Planning process • Advocated restructuring connection fees and user rates to better reflect District's actual costs-after refinement in RAC have been adopted • Participated in search and selection of current General Manager Other Public Sector Accomplishments Director,Irvine Ranch Water District-20 Years(13 years as President) Founding Director,National Water Research Institute(in 3'a term as Chairman) Commissioner,Santiago Aqueduct Commission Former Director, Southern California Water Committee(former member of Executive Board and Treasurer) Founding Member,State Water Conservation Coalition-helped establish BMP's(Ben Management Practices in water use) Private Sector Accomplishments Treasurer,Pacific Scientific Company(employed 20 years until sold in 1998) Member of Board of Directors, SC Bancoip/Southem California Bank(five years mail sold in 1997)-member Compensation,Investment,Merger/Acquisition.Senior Loam and Audit(Chairman)Comminces Community Founding Director and Treasurer of the Orange Coast College Foundation 1986-1992 Former Member of the Board of the Metro YMCA Founding Director,San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary(President since formation 6 years ago) Director, Altema at Newport Coast HOA(four years,currently President) Director,Newport Coast HOA(in third year currently Vice President) Member,Advisory Board Leadership Tomorrow(five years) Military Captain,US Army Infantry-served as helicopter pilot in Vietnam conflict v `v Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MAY 26, 1999 OJN� AMI TqT/ 2 � c 9 O y Fcl/yam �NV`Q0� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting O5/26/99 Page 2 of 8 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on May 26, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was railed and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian A Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore Brian Donahue X Harty Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo John M. Gullixson X Gene Wisner A Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts A Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Sates A Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Dawn McKinley; Greg Mathews; Peter Hass; Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Ray Lewis;Jeffrey M. Oderman;Terry Lane; Greg Woodside Minutes for Board Meeting 05/26/99 Page 3 of 8 REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair reminded the Directors of the following upcoming meetings: 5127/99-Ad Hoc for the Strategic Plan Committee Meeting at 5:00 p.m. 6/12/99- Chino Basin Tour at 9:00 a.m. 6/17/99-PAC 2 Meeting at 9:00 a.m. 6/19/99-Strategic Plan Workshop at 9:00 a.m. 6/25/99- Legislator's Day at 8:30 a.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 28, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and °B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/99 04/30/99 Totals $4,108,789.88 $4,358,811.73 Director Russell Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 19035. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim filed on behalf of Janarae Lee, and deny Application for Late Claim. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the May 26, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 28, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-05, re Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future Areas to be Served by the Orange County Sanitation Distifct, and rescind Resolution No. OCSD 98-11. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the May 5, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held May 5, 1999 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting 05/26/99 i Page 4 of 8 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratty the award of purchase order contracts to various vendors for purchase of Y2K Noncompliant Lab Equipment (Spec cation No. E-274) in an amount not to exceed $475,000 plus tax and freight, in accordance with Resolution No. OCSD98-21, as follows: -Gas Chromatograph - ICP-Mass Spectrometer -Combination Flame and Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometer -Automated Mercury Analyzer - Gas Chromatograph- Mass Spectrometer - Biological Oxygen Demand Controller Software Upgrade - Controller Board and Software Upgrades for Data Management System - Controller and Software Upgrades to Segmented Flow Autoanalyzer - Controller and Software Upgrades to Automated Identification Systems (Vitek) - Software and Hardware Upgrades to Liquid Chromatography Systems Director Mark Murphy abstained. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside Financial Corporation (Specification No. L-009-1) for lease of 18.09 acres of land at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley,for one year. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve District funding for Cooperative Projects related to inflow and infiltration reduction totaling $2,257,656 as recommended by the Guidance Review Committee. Director Swan made a Substitution Motion to approve all projects, except four, which shall go back to the OMTS Committee for. (1) a more complete study and recommendation conceming the inequities of not charging the projects to the individual Revenue Areas; and (2) further evaluation of four projects re cost recovery and reduction of inflow and infiltration. Director Collins made a Substitute Motion that (1) the total funding in the amount of$2,257,656 be approved, to be paid from the General Fund for Fiscal Year 1999-00; and (2)that the four specific projects be referred back to the OMTS Committee for further evaluation, with all other projects approved. Director Collins requested that the Motion be divided and voted upon separately. The first Motion was approved unanimously; the second Motion was defeated with a vote of 6 Ayes, 13 Nays. Director Swan withdrew his Substitute Motion. Original Motion was voted on and approved,with Directors Peer A. Swan and Mark A. Murphy opposed. Minutes for Board Meeting 05/26/99 Page 5 of 8 ' 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the May 6, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services ' Committee Minutes for the meeting held May 6, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades,Job No. J-57,with First Fire System, Inc. authorizing an addition of$6,369 and 35 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$360,710.49; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of $90,000 for a total project budget of$650,000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3- 38-3, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc., authorizing an addition of $71,597 and 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $5,184,355, Director Steve Anderson opposed. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. 121.41, Seismic Retrofit of Nonstructural Systems at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Nonstructural Systems at Plant No.2, Job No. 122-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $54,677, increasing the total contract amount to$9,017,443; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing a deduction of$2,355 for a total contract amount of$9,015,088; and, (3)Accept Job Nos. P141, P143, P1-44, P248, P2-50, P2-53.2, SP19950021, and SP19950059 as complete, authorizing a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Constriction, Inc. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3)Award a contract to Barnard Construction Company, Inc. for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid),for an amount not to exceed $7,686,000; (4)Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid) in the amount of$806,264 for a total budget of$9,133,664; and (5)Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid) in the amount of$129,736, for a total budget of$625,936. Minutes for Board Meeting 05/26/99 .i Page 6 of 8 g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with K.S. Dunbar&Associates Environmental Engineering to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not exceed $156,000; and (2) Direct staff to contact the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority in an effort to obtain their commitment to share the costs for the design and construction of the project. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to delegate authority to the Purchasing Manager to negotiate and purchase Two 2000 kW Diesel Standby Generator Systems and Associated Electrical Equipment (Specification No. E-275) in connection with Standby Power and Reliability Improvements for Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Computer Facility Integration for development of a Computerized Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $2,303,683; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with FM International to provide technical and project management assistance for Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $243,000. Director Mark Murphy abstained. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the May 12, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held May 12, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1999. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending March 31, 1999. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the selection of Blue Cross Plus and Blue Cross HMO to replace United HealthCare's Point-of-Service Plan and PacifiCare's Health Maintenance Organization Plan effective July 1, 1999. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file correspondence from Rutan & Tucker dated May 18, 1999, on behalf of ProLogis Trust (formerly Security Capital Industrial Trust). Minutes for Board Meeting O5/26/99 Page 7 of 8 h. There was a presentation made by Jeffrey Odernan, Counsel for Prol-ogis Trust, endorsing the staff recommendation in part, and objecting to the staff recommendation in part. Discussion and questions by the Directors followed. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve in concept the substantive provisions of a District Ordinance establishing a Comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance. Director Steve Anderson abstained. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Direct staff to prepare a comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance for introduction and first reading at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on June 23, 1999; 2) Provide public notice; and 3) Schedule a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on July 21, 1999. Director Steve Anderson abstained. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-06, urging the California Legislature to modify the"County Sanitation District Act"to increase the maximum monthly compensation allowed for Directors, under the same or similar provisions as allowed for Directors of Water Districts and Utility Districts. Directors Lynn Daucher and Mark Murphy opposed. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins re the May 3, 1999 and May 25, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held May 3, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Eisenberg, Oliver! and Associates for the preparation of a Health Risk Assessment in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $225,690, with costs to be shared equally with the Orange County Water District. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications for public relations services for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed$204,895 with costs to be shared equally with the Orange County Water District. Director Norm Eckenrode opposed. r Minutes for Board Meeting 05/26/99 S Page 8 of 8 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications and Addendum No. 1 for RA 6"B"Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to Mladen Grbavac Construction, for RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, for an amount not to exceed $191,604. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 9:18 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3). No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:54 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. 17. a. 4. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Amend Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, by adding Section 4.8 to Policy C10.00 to divide the existing total base salary amount into two components—namely: base salary and investment incentive salary; (2)Approve a 6.3% adjustment of the exempt pay range structure effective July 1, 1999; (3)Approve recommended adjustments to the exempt classification structure effective July 1, 1999; and (4) Ratify Management's Last, Best& Final Offer to the SPMT Group, to include Items Nos. (1) and (2) above. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:54 p.m. i L � Secretary o 6 Board yy� i ctors of Orange Cott Sanitatio District H:1w Aaregendar9oard MinulesUM Board Wrules\0526W,dioc Claims Paid From 411199 to 4115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 18642 Systems Integrated $ 52.177.79 Construction Services J-31-3 18643 Rick J.Hannappel 556.40 APICS Training Reimb. 18644 Orange County Sanitation District 488,982.96 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 18645 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 18646 Mark Castillo 1,481.50 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18647 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 18648 Computers America, Inc. 1,207.80 Computer Supplies 18649 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2202A1 Electrical Supplies 18650 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 18651 CASA 145.00 Conference Registration 18652 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 18653 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 268.94 Paint Supplies 18654 DSI:Data Systems International 4,461.93 4.19GB Disk Unit for AS400 18655 Foss Environmental 60.49 Publication X 18656 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Gamishment .s., 18657 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment y18658 Gartner Group Inc. 1.395.00 Conference Registration 18659 GTE California 605.13 Telephone Services 18660 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 198.95 Plumbing Supplies 18661 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 4.95 Compressor Parts 18662 StateNet 165.00 Online Service 18663 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 18664 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,788.75 Dues Deduction 18665 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 18666 Lessons in Leadership 279.00 Registration 18667 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 505.30 Tools 18668 Mission Abrasive Supplies 130.11 Tools&Supplies 18669 Motion industries 1,446.55 Pump Supplies 18670 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 349.00 Registration 18671 Optio Software 11,800.00 NT Upgrade&Annual Maint. 18672 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 18673 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 18674 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 2,145.58 Electrical Supplies 18675 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 118.44 Fittings 18676 OCFA 615.07 Dues Deduction 18677 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 18678 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 18679 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 411/99 to 4116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18680 Quad Knopf, Inc. 1,243.50 Professional Services-Wheeler Site Study 18681 Quality Building Supply 905.10 Landscaping Supplies 18682 Realtime Systems Corporation 8,930.00 Integration&Support Services 18683 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 269.61 Paint Supplies 18684 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 183.12 Tools 18685 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,695.05 Tools/Hardware 18686 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 18687 Southern California Edison 5,706.48 Power 18688 State of California 125.53 Wage Garnishment 18689 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 253.71 Mechanical Supplies 18690 Trans 1,641.08 Electrical Supplies 18691 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 18692 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 18693 Water Environment Federation 81.25 Publication 18694 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 326.13 Valves m 18695 Blake Anderson 200.76 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18696 Layne T. Baroldi 249.12 Meeting Expense Reimb. y 18697 Patrick B.Miles 851.84 Meeting Expense Reimb. y 18698 Michael D. Moore 113.01 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18699 Edward M.Torres 325.59 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18700 Voided Check - - 18701 RPI/Bio Gro 62,937.09 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 18702 BRSC(BloSolids Recyclers of So. Cal) 25,000.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Management 18703 Bristol Systems, Inc. 54.558.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 18704 Brown&Caldwell 110,958.07 Engineering Services Pi-37&J-35-1 18705 Carollo Engineers 132,210.16 Engineering Services J-254&Y2K Project 18706 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 34,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program 18707 County of Orange 45,887.00 Permit Fees 18708 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 81,378.31 3 Dell Monitors& 11 Computer Workstations 18709 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 31.859.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl. &Support 18710 James Martin&Co. 115,402.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 18711 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 96.412.84 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27.95 18712 Lee&Ro, Inc. 33,676.86 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 18713 Pacificare of Ca. 37.264.26 Health Insurance Premium 18714 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 165,599.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 18715 Pinkerton Systems Integration 62,868.95 Security Card Reader System 18716 Southern Califomia Edison 45,265.54 Power 18717 SPEC Services, Inc. 89,148.12 Engineedng Services J-33-1 18718 Technology Integration Group 64.525.01 Computer Supplies Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18719 Tule RanchlMagan Farms 99,332.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 18720 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 63,507.60 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 18721 Airpol Construction, Inc. 26,316.93 Construction PI-51R 18722 KPRS Construction Company 91,711.80 Construction P2.65 18723 Margate Construction,Inc. 60.150.00 Construction Pl-36-2 15724 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 15,200.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 18725 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1.25 Long Distance Telephone Services 18726 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 10.86 Long Distance Telephone Services 18727 A.M. Best Company, Inc. 88.95 Subscription 18728 AccuStandard, Inc. 342.30 Lab Supplies 18729 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Electrical Supplies 18730 Aidw Systems, Inc. 22,385.00 Electrical Supplies 18731 Airborne Express 37.25 Air Freight 18732 Airgas Lyons Safety 857.12 Safety Supplies 18733 Alaska Sea Grant Program 35.00 Publication a" 18734 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 309.68 Mechanical Supplies .+ 18735 Alltech Associates 131.69 Lab Supplies H 18736 Ponton Industries 236.61 Cable y 18737 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 495.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 18738 Appleone Employment Service 3.903.25 Temporary Employment Services 18739 Argent Communications Group 379.50 Subscription 18740 Arizona Instrument-Jerome Division 660.46 Instrument Supplies 18741 Asbury Environmental Services 274.00 Waste Oil Removal 18742 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 137.96 Publication 18743 ABB Industrial Systems, Inc. 4,872.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 18744 API Fund For Payroll Education, Inc. 715.00 Training Program 18745 AWSI 226.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 18746 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 752.32 Electrical Supplies 18747 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 3,924.43 Telephone Installation 18748 Battelle-Northwest 50.55 Meeting Expense 18749 Battery Specialties 682.45 Batteries 18750 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 343.80 Lab Supplies 18751 Boutwell&Ennor,L.L.P. 62.50 Legal Services 401a Plan 18752 Brinkmann Instruments, Inc. 1,955.11 Lab Supplies 18753 Brinton-Merati Economics,Inc. 2,543.75 Legal Services-Cartel 18754 Business Education Services 195.00 Registration 18755 Buy.Com 22.61 Computer Supplies 18756 BNI Building News 87.51 Publication 18757 Calif Centrifugal Pump 3.260.37 Pump Supplies Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18758 Camp Dresser 8 McKee, Inc. 8,965.00 Engineering Services J40-1 18759 Carl R.Nelson, P.E. 3.140.00 Engineering Consultant 18760 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 446.00 Engineering Services P1-63 18761 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 863.13 Office Furniture 18762 City of Costa Mesa 450.00 Service Contract-Gisler Road Repair 18763 Clean Source 144.39 Janitorial Supplies 18764 Compass Publications 25.50 Publication 18765 Compuserve Incorporated 29.90 Computer Services 18766 Computers America, Inc. 1.381.36 Computer Supplies 18767 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 2.867.93 Electrical Supplies 18768 Converse Consultants 10,W6.10 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 18789 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9.485.53 Engine Supplies 18770 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 18771 Corporate Express 2,362.90 Office Supplies 18772 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 6.426.21 Computer Software to be used for Plant Automation/Reinvention Project#J42 18773 Cost Containment Solutions 601.65 Worker's Comp. Services m 18774 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,701.55 Electrical Supplies y 18775 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service a 18776 Cytec Industries 7.992.84 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 c 18777 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 760.01 Lab Supplies 18778 CWEA Annual Conference 132.00 Conference Registration 18779 Daily Pilot 43.75 Notices 8 Ads 18780 Datavault 101.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 18781 David's Tree Service 7.260.00 Tree Removal 18782 De Guelle 8 Sons Glass Co. 232AI Safety Glass 18783 Dee Jaspers 6 Assoc. 11.798.98 Legal Services-Cartel 18784 DeZurik C/O Misco/SoulhWest 2,735.44 Valves 18785 Diamond H Recognition 739.50 Employee Service Awards 18786 Dover Elevator Company 3.738.30 Elevator Maintenance 18787 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 209.84 Paint Supplies 18788 Eberhard Equipment 1,018.60 Tractor Repair 18789 ECOS 80.00 Subscription 18790 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.D0 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 18791 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.583.68 Professional Services-Legislative 18792 Engineering Sales Service 1,112.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 18793 Faxpress, Inc. 414.24 Office Supplies 18794 FedEx Corporation 334.18 Air Freight 18795 Fibertron 928.26 Fiber Optic Cable 18795 Fine Science Tools, Inc. 234.69 Tools Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18797 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 304.47 Lab Supplies 18798 Flo-Systems, Inc. 11,938.21 Pump Supplies 18799 Forestry Suppliers 854.82 Lab Supplies 18800 Fountain Valley Camera 152.66 Photo Supplies 18801 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 219.00 Truck Wash Tickets 18802 Franklin Covey 64.90 Office Supplies 18803 Frazee Paint and Wallcovedng 118.53 Paint Supplies 18804 Fred Pryor Seminars 390.00 Training Registration 18805 Fry's Electronics 1,080.51 Computer Supplies 18806 Garratt-Callahan Company 215.50 Chemicals 18807 Gartner Group, Inc. 1,395.00 Conference Registration 18808 GTE Califomia 8,087.06 Telephone Services 18809 Gibson,Dunn&Crutcher, L.L.P. 318.75 Legal Services 18810 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,357.80 Pump Supplies 18811 Governing 16.00 Subscription 18812 W W Grainger, Inc. 1,717.15 Compressor Supplies . 18813 Great American Printing Co. 700.28 Printing Service H 18814 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 64.00 Janitorial Supplies y 18815 GS Edwards A Div. of GS Bldg. Systems 1,368.83 Safety Supplies 18816 GTE Hawaii 217.02 Telephone Service-Conference Call 18817 Haaker Equipment Company 1,558.15 Truck Supplies 18818 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 69.60 Plumbing Supplies 18819 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 142.05 Catering Services 18820 Hewlett-Packard 112.10 Lab Supplies 18821 Hilti 183.24 Tools 18822 Hilton, Fernkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 5,270.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 18823 Home Depot 448.29 Small Hardware 18824 Idexx 4,935.60 Lab Supplies 18825 Imaging Plus, Inc. 835.57 Office Supplies 18826 Industrial Air Compressor 490.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 18827 StateNet 165.00 Online Service 18828 Intergraph Corporation 4,014.78 Software 18829 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 18830 ICOM America, Inc. 95.25 Lab Supplies 18831 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,513.05 Safety Supplies 1 B832 ISLUA 545.00 Registration 1 B833 J&B Auto Parts 353.78 Auto Parts&Supplies 18834 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 132.23 Instrument Supplies 18835 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 6,490.00 Training Expenses Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18836 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 21,797.26 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 18837 Jay's Catering 583.01 Catering Services 18838 Jensen Instruments Co. 640.77 Instrument Supplies 18839 Johnson Power Ltd. 347.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 18840 Johnstone Supply 87.37 Electrical Supplies 18841 JO Edwards Sorlthem CA Users Group 150.00 Membership 18842 Kahl Scientific Instruments 238.66 Lab Supplies 18843 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,287.24 Medical Insurance Premium 18844 Knox Industrial Supplies 607A8 Tools 18845 KADY International 2,500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental 18846 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 170.01 Safety Supplies 18847 Lab Support 2,700.00 Temporary Employment Services 18848 Leadership Directories, Inc. 1,323.00 Subscription 18849 League Of California Cities 40.00 Registration 18850 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,639.07 Architectural Services x 18851 LHI 100.00 Computer Software Registration-LOphtCrack N 18852 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,644.10 Mechanical Supplies 18853 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 230.42 Plumbing Supplies "e 18854 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,320.76 Tools > 18855 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 631.09 Auto Parts 8 Supplies ° 18856 Mellon Trust 15,976.76 Investment Custodian Bank 18857 Microcal Software, Inc. 910.00 Computer Software 18858 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14.408.20 Mechanical Repairs 18859 Milltronics,Inc. 75.84 Electrical Supplies 18860 Mission Uniform Service 3.488.97 Uniform Rentals 18861 Mitchell Instrument Co. 168.00 Instruments 18862 Monitor Labs, Inc. 114.16 Instrument Maint. 18863 MPS Photographic Services 64.12 Photographic Services 18864 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 18865 National Fire Protection Association 1,522.95 Subscription 18866 National Institute of Stds&Technolgy 676.00 Lab Supplies 18867 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 18868 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 1,785.00 Registration 18869 Neal Supply Co. 628.82 Plumbing Supplies 18870 Network Solutions Group 680.00 Professional Service-Voice/Data Communication 18871 New Hermes, Inc. 159.10 Tools 18872 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 349.00 Registration 18873 Newport Wave, Inc. 116.67 Software 18874 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12,613.66 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 411/99 to 4/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18875 Ninyo&Moore 699.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 18876 Office Depot Business Services Div. 749.61 Office Supplies 18877 Orange County Sanitation District 22,808.45 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 18878 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 180.80 Plumbing Supplies 18879 Oxygen Service Company 889.99 Specialty Gases 18850 OCB Reprographics 3,716.85 Printing Service-Spec P-173 18881 OI Analytical 121.29 Lab Supplies 18882 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 52.50 Electrical Supplies 18883 Pacific Bell 37.25 Telephone Services 18884 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1.151.50 Registration 18885 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,685.61 Plumbing Supplies 18886 Padre Janitorial Supplies 37.17 Janitorial Supplies 18887 Pans Unlimited 219.16 Truck Supplies 18888 Patriot Video Productions 626.66 Video Taping Services 18889 Peerless Pump Company 81.37 Training Supplies r.1 18890 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 295.55 Lab Supplies Fa 18891 Polydyne, Inc. 11,907.53 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 m 18892 Port Supply 47.23 Lab Supplies y 18893 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. Y 18894 Print Management Group, Inc. 1.521.43 Printing Services 18895 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 770.81 Instrument Supplies 18896 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 18897 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2.324.22 Trash Removal 18898 Remedy Temp 2,450.72 Temporary Employment Services 18899 Rosemount/Uniloc 103.71 Instrument Supplies 18900 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 3,750.00 Engineering Services 18901 Schwing America, Inc. 1,680.04 Pump Supplies 18902 Seagate Software 1,933.69 Software 18903 Seagate Software 850.00 Registration 18904 Sears Industrial Sales 170.89 Mechanical Supplies 18905 Second-Sun 794.00 Light Fixtures 18906 Sensorex 137.97 Electrical Supplies 18907 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 852.21 Tools 18908 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,325.80 Tools/Hardware 18909 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 18910 Supelco, Inc. 430.21 Lab Supplies 18911 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 178.40 Plumbing Supplies 18912 So.Cal.Gas Company 4,431.18 Natural Gas 18913 Soco-Lynch Corp. 261.70 Janitorial Services Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 4/1/99 to 4/15199 Warr4rd No. Vendor Amount Description 18914 Softchoice 829.68 Software 18915 Southern California Edison 364.82 Electrical Service 18916 Southern California Trane Service 57.08 Publication 18917 Sparkletts 2.020.79 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 18918 State Board Of Equalization 476.30 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 18919 StudioVisia 2.950.00 Computer Consulting Services 18920 Summit Steel 354.10 Metal 18921 Sunset Industrial Pads 1,516.69 Mechanical Supplies 18922 Super Chem Corporation 905.10 Chemicals 18923 Swains Electric Motor Service 2.233.31 Pump 18924 Syscom, Inc. 2.756.00 On-Site Training 18925 The Register 2.257.20 Notices 8 Ads 18926 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 654.22 Lab Supplies 18927 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.398.80 Mechanical Supplies 18928 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 18929 Trade Service Corporation 2,218.10 Electrical Supplies �x. 18930 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 664.40 Truck Supplies .°1., 18931 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 120.00 Lab Services 'a 18932 Teksystems 4.506.00 Temporary Employment Services 18933 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,252.75 Filters 18934 The Unisource Corporation 241.11 Office Supplies 18935 United Parcel Service 259.70 Parcel Services 18936 United Rental 710.78 Forklift Rental 18937 Valley Cities Supply Company 408.33 Plumbing Supplies 18938 Vortex Industries, Inc. 985.29 Door Repair 18939 VWR Scientific 3,303.54 Lab Supplies 18940 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,041.52 Security Guards 18941 Waste News 24.00 Subscription 18942 Water Environment Research Foundation 13.30 Publication 18943 WateReuse Association 2,000.00 Membership 18944 Wayne Electric Co. 406.30 Electrical Supplies 18945 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 144.08 Electrical Supplies 18946 Western States Chemical, Inc. 6,881.05 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 18947 Western Wholesale 658.95 Tools 18948 Xerox Corporation 10.382.11 Copier Leases 18949 Xetex Incorporated 1.890.24 Lab Supplies 18950 6th National Watershed Conf. 210.00 Registration 18951 Systems Integrated 5,950.95 Construction Services J-31-3 18952 Veme's Plumbing 225.00 Plumbing Supplies Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 4/1199 to 4116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18953 Layne T.Baroldi 113.01 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18954 Bradley H. Cagle 250.00 Meeting Expense 18955 Norman Eckenrode 300.00 Meeting Expense 18956 Robert P.Ghirelli 180.61 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18957 Mark Leyes 300.00 Meeting Expense 18958 Peer A. Swan 300.00 Meeting Expense 18959 Mark A.Tomko 151.15 Training Expenses Reimb. 18960 Michael D.White 250.00 Meeting Expense 18961 Compu Master 199.00 Registration 18962 Bruce Chapman and Compuxpress 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program 18983 BNI Building News 960.00 Publication 18964 County of Orange 120.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 18965 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 1,750.00 Registration 18966 Kelly Christensen and Dell Computer Corp. 1,398.00 Employee Computer Loan Program y 18967 Orange County Sanitation District 880.97 Petty Cash Reimb. 18968 Quest Focus 99 Registration 3,600.00 Registration Total Accounts Payable•Warrants $ 2,745,477.52 Payroll Disbursements 13519-13657 Employee Paychecks $ 180,502.13 Biweekly Payroll 417/99 13658-13662 Employee Paychecks 52,576.87 Termination 1 3663-1 3685 Directors'Paychecks e,834.96 Payroll 419/99 36424-36863 Direct Deposit Statements 608.208.25 Biweekly Payroll 417/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 848,122.21 Wire Transfer Payments Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 153,466.47 April Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 198,397.82 April Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank&Trust 163,325.86 April Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 515,190.15 Total Claims Paid 411199.4115199 $ 4,108,789.88 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 18969 Abesco $ 69.87 Hardware 18970 AGFA Upgrade Service 15.00 Freight 18971 CWEA-Membership 90.00 Membership 18972 CASA 145.00 Conference Registration 18973 CWFA Annual Conference 220.00 Conference Registration 18974 GTE California 412.44 Telephone Services 18975 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.74 Water Use 18976 Airgas Direct Intl-IPCO Safety Div. 902.89 Safety Supplies 18977 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,429.98 Tools 18978 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 208.02 Fittings 18979 Pacific Bell 53.40 Telephone Services 18980 Printers Parts 18.71 Office Supplies 18981 Road Works, Inc. 97.50 Registration 18982 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 156.23 Paint Supplies ry 18983 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,527.23 Tools y 18984 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,165.70 ToolstHardware m 18985 So. Cal. Gas Company 10,629.99 Natural Gas y 18986 Summit Steel 92.02 Metal m 18987 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 17.54 Mechanical Supplies .. 18988 Union Bank of California 4,083.96 Banking Services 18989 West Madne/E&B Discount Marine 308.16 Communication Equipment 18990 Xerox Corporation 161.63 Copier Leases 18991 Simon L.Watson 246.58 Meeting Expense Reimb. 18992 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.550.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 18993 Orange County Sanitation District 392,035.40 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 18994 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 18995 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 18996 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 18997 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 18998 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 18999 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 19000 Internal Revenue Service 48.45 Wage Garnishment 19001 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,788.75 Dues Deduction 19002 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 19003 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19004 OCEA 615.07 Dues Deduction 19005 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 19006 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19007 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4/30/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19008 State of California 122.49 Wage Garnishment 19009 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 19010 Voided Check - - 19011 Voided Check - - 19012 Voided Check - - 19013 Voided Check - - 19014 Voided Check - - 19015 Voided Check - - 19016 Allied Systems/Supply Co. 52,125.48 Plumbing Equipment 19017 Delta Dental 37,740.60 Dental Insurance Plan 19018 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 131.841.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 19019 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 54,325.46 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 19020 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 46,481.15 Professional Services J40-4 19021 James Martin&Co. 122,787.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 19022 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 45,129.89 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19023 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 34.422.95 Engineering Services J-62 H 19024 Network Catalyst. Inc. 68,477.63 Computer Supplies 19025 Orange County Water District 56.269.13 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 "e III Pinkerton Systems Integration 44.999.29 Security Card Reader System 19027 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 75,098.46 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 ^' 19028 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 36.273.77 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 19029 Western States Chemical, Inc. 37,617.90 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95 19030 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 64.386.17 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 19031 Airpol Construction,Inc. 49,490.45 Construction Pi-51R 19032 Mike Prlich&Sons 92,066.00 Construction 6.12 19033 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 70,534.82 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 19034 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 80,100.00 Construction 2-34R 19035 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 1,047,797.67 Construction 7-7-1 &P2.35-3 19036 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 4,8B0.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 19037 A&R Telecom 8.911.03 Communication Equipment 19038 A Biederman, Inc. 798.27 Instrument Maint. 19039 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 7.29 Long Distance Telephone Services 19040 Abesco 2.93 Hardware 19041 Acoustical Material Services 87.00 Ceiling Tile 19042 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.952.50 Engine Testing J-19 19043 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 3,503.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19044 Aideo Systems, Inc. 11,716.19 Electrical Supplies 19045 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 19046 Airborne Express 12.26 Air Freight 19047 American Airlines 8.480.41 Travel Services Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19048 American Society of Safety Engineering 217.40 Publication 19049 American Training Resources, Inc. 808.13 Training Materials 19050 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 19051 Appleone Employment Service 6,072.45 Temporary Employment Services 19052 Applied Industrial Technology 34.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19053 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,053.00 Vacuum Truck Services 19054 Auerbach 15.11 Publication 19065 ABM Business Machines, Inc. 139.90 Office Equipment Maint. 19056 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 20,000.00 Professional Services-Flaw Monitoring Project 19057 Assoc.of Metro. Sewerage Agencies 1,100.00 Registration 19058 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 436.72 Long Distance Telephone Services 19059 AT&T Wireless Service 1,B27.69 Cellular Telephone Service 19060 L.A. Cellular Telephone Company 216.48 Cellular Telephone Service 19061 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 1,892.74 Electrical Supplies 19062 Battelle 250.00 Registration 19063 Battery Specialties 1,706.37 Batteries �.., 19064 Bearings&Drives, Inc. 803.82 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19065 BearCom 2,615.81 Communication Equipment "t 19066 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 141.18 Lab Services 19067 Body Pros 2.635.50 Vehicle Body Repair 19068 Boot Sam 274.54 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 19069 Bristol Systems, Inc. 16,071.25 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 19070 Burke Engineering Co. 582.69 Electrical Supplies 19071 Business Education Services 195.00 Legal Services 19072 Business Publishers, Inc. 347.00 Subscription 19073 Buy.Com 84.35 Computer Supplies 19074 Cal-Pac Chemical Co, Inc. 169.61 Chemicals 19075 Calif Centrifugal Pump 910.00 Pump Supplies 19076 Calif Energy Commission Publications 30.00 Publication 19077 California Automatic Gate 973.80 Service Agreement 19078 Career Track Seminars MS2 99.00 Seminar Registration 19079 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 19080 Carollo Engineers 23,079.03 Engineering Services-Pi-36-2 19081 Charles P.Crowley Co. 114.39 Instrument Parts 19082 City Office Furniture, Inc. 3,409.80 Office Supplies 19083 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 2,357.50 Professional Services-Ergonomic 19084 Coastal Video Communications Corp. 1.289.52 Training Software 19085 Computers America, Inc. 123.92 Computer Supplies 19086 Connell GM Parts 130.83 Track Supplies 19087 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 3,914.94 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 9 ., Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19088 Consolidated Plastics Company 1,783.55 Lab Supplies 19089 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,184.76 Engine Supplies 19090 Corporate Express Imaging 2,132.97 Misc. Computer Supplies 19091 Corporate Express 1,527.13 Office Supplies 19092 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 19093 Cotelligent 1,115.63 Professional Services-Computer 19094 County of Orange 1,695.90 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19095 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,565.20 Electrical Supplies 19096 Cummins Cal Pacific 8.00 Publication 19097 Cylec Industries 14,734.00 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18 19098 California Assoc. of Sanitation Agencies 10,000.00 Membership 19099 CHMIA 450.00 Registration 19100 David's Tree Service 10,050.00 Tree Removal 19101 Dee Jasper and Associates 938.00 Legal Services-Cartel 19102 Dell Computer 14,040.26 1 Latitude Notebook Computer,8 Backup Tapes&Networking Peripheral Set k 19103 DeZunk C/O Misco/SoulhWest 6,904.62 Valves m 19104 DR DAB 105.00 Electrical Maint. H 00 19105 Marcus D. Dubois 150.00 Training Expense H 's 19106 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 661.37 Paint Supplies 19107 DGA Consultants, Inc. 12,340.97 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 19108 DME, Inc. 2,214.26 Compressor Parts 19109 DWG Associates 7,025.37 Professional Services-Oxygen Generation 19110 E.Courtney Anderson 636.60 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour 19111 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 2,045.00 Medical Screening 19112 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 19113 Environmental Data Solutions Grips, L.L.0 7,680.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info. Mgmt. Sys, Implementation Project 19114 Environmental Express 956.62 Lab Supplies 19115 Environmental Resource Association!ERA 1,148.60 Lab Services 19116 Eric Joyce 498.66 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour 19117 Expo Power Systems, Inc. 26.94 Publication 19118 Faxpress, Inc. 590.47 Office Supplies 19119 FedEx Corporation 154.54 Air Freight 19120 Filter Supply Company 334.87 Filters 19121 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 939.76 Lab Supplies 19122 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 129.00 Concrete Cutting 19123 Flo-Systems, Inc. 535.91 Pump Supplies 19124 Forestry Suppliers 82.00 Lab Supplies 19125 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,132.84 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 19126 Fountain Valley Camera 12.37 Photo Supplies Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19127 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 405.81 Paint Supplies 19128 Voided Check - - 19129 Frazee Paint and Wallcovenng 458.69 Paint Supplies 19130 Fry's Electronics 416.70 Computer Supplies 19131 General Electric Supply Company 80.81 Electric Parts 19132 Ganahl Lumber Company 3.280.77 Lumber/Hardware 19133 Ganaft-Callahan Company 4,000.76 Chemicals 19134 GTE California 807.62 Telephone Services 19135 George T. Hall 4,800.24 Valve Assembly 19136 George Yardley Co. 235.04 Lab Supplies 19137 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 19136 Gopher Electronics Company 119.90 Electrical Supplies 19139 Graham Brothers 12.612.00 Construction Services-Lab Air Duct Work 19140 Graseby S.T.I. 228.92 Engine Supplies 19141 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 374.32 Janitorial Supplies re 19142 Haaker Equipment Company 2,385.32 Truck Supplies tr,,.l9 19143 Harrington Industrial Plastics. Inc. 489.68 Plumbing Supplies m 19144 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 46.00 Catering Services 1 19145 Hilfi, Inc. 59.27 Tools to 19146 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 193.35 Compressor Parts N 19147 The Holman Group 718.52 Employee Assistance Program Premium 19148 Home Depot 576.25 Small Hardware 19149 Hub Auto Supply 57.74 Truck Parts 19160 City of Huntington Beach 24.97 Water Use 19151 HOW Design Conference 670.00 Registration 19152 Industrial Air Compressor 2,900.55 Equipment Rental 19153 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 88.18 Truck Supplies - 19154 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 296.26 Lab Supplies 19155 Irvine Ranch Water District 39.28 Water Use 19156 Ism c/o FLW, Inc. 209.72 Lab Supplies 19157 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 153.08 Safety Supplies 19158 Jitney Company, Inc. 7.780.78 Communication Equipment 19159 Johnstone Supply 98.96 Electrical Supplies 19160 FormsTronirsRichards Capital Corporation 682.05 Business Forms-Checks 19161 K.P. Lindstrom 12,375.52 Envir. Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 19162 Lab Support 4,550.63 Temporary Employment Services 19163 Labconco 98.94 Lab Supplies 19164 LeserAll Corporation 787.89 Service Agreement 19165 Law Journal Press 6.78 Publication 19166 Law/Crandall 180.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 Page 5 of 9 •• Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4/30199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19167 Leadership Companies, Inc. 6,993.20 Software 19168 Leadership Directories 468.35 Subscription 19169 Legal Arts Multimedia, L.L.C. 6,757.00 Legal Services-Cartel 19170 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 300.32 Galvanize Beams @ Barscreen 19171 LAPA 95.00 Los Angeles Power Association Membership 19172 Voided Check - - 19173 Maintenance Products, Inc. 1,734.78 Mechanical Supplies 19174 Mar Vac Electronics 86.99 Instrument Supplies 19175 Marcy Rothenberg 600.00 Professional Services-Copywriter for the Internet Project 19176 MasTec Network Services 11,480.17 Communication Service 19177 Mc Junkin Corporation 619.14 Plumbing Supplies 19178 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 978.03 Tools 19179 Medlin Controls Co. 1.470.97 Instrument Supplies 19180 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6.356.18 Mechanical Repairs 19181 Mission Abrasive Supplies 60.30 Tools&Supplies L^ 19182 Mission Uniform Service 3,257.88 Uniform Rentals i.+ 19183 Mitchell Instrument Co. 4,045.00 Instruments 19184 Motion Industries 266.70 Pump Supplies 'j 19185 Municipal Maintenance Equipment 720.53 Auto Parts&Supplies 19186 MGE UPS System 75.00 Publication 19187 MPS Photographic Services 33.95 Photographic Services 19188 National Fire Protection Association 519.19 Publication 19189 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2,375.00 Registration 19190 Neal Supply Co. 875.21 Plumbing Supplies 19191 Nelson Garcia 296.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour 19192 Nelson Marketing 333.15 Tools 19193 Network Construction Services 7,769.06 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project 19194 NetManage, Inc. 4,040.63 AS/400 Software Maint. 19195 Newark Electronics 641.92 Instrument Supplies 19196 City of Newport Beach 28.74 Water Use 19197 Nextel Communications 661.71 Cellular Phones&Air Time 19198 Nicholas Chevrolet 35.80 Truck Repairs 19199 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 7,666.49 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 19200 Ninyo&Moore 1.172.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 19201 The Norco Companies 119.00 Mail Delivery Service 19202 NAB Associates, Inc. 905.00 Lab Services 19203 Network Solutions Group 7,900.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 19204 Occupational Vision Services 109.84 Safety Glasses 19206 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,597.64 Once Supplies 19208 Olsson Construction, Inc. 10.880.00 Construction P2-55 Page 6 of 9 Claim Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19207 Oracle 1.818.00 Registration 19208 Orange County Overhead Door 209.30 Door Repair 19209 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 859.00 Electrical Supplies 19210 Oxygen Service Company 2.167.19 Specialty Gases 19211 OCB Reprographics 5,769.01 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19212 OCCABA 45.00 Orange County Compensation and Benefits Assoc. Membership 19213 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 106.28 Electrical Supplies 19214 Pacific Bell 1,133.28 Telephone Services 19215 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Service 19216 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.295.40 Plumbing Supplies 19217 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 7,045.41 Mechanical Supplies 19218 Pagenet 1,982.10 Rental Equipment 19219 Pervo Paint Co 183.61 Paint Supplies 19220 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 13,011.60 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19221 Pitney Bowes 365.94 Postage Machine Service Agreement 19222 Polydyne, Inc. 21.459.79 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19223 Power Distributors, Inc. 6,750.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation .p°. 19224 Pulsafeeder Inc 504.37 Pump Supplies "s 19225 Pyramid Fence Company, Inc. 366.00 Fencing Installation 19226 PGC Scientifics 143.40 Lab Supplies 19227 Regents of University of Calif. 290.00 Registration 19228 Reliastar 17.924.53 Employee Medical Health Premium 19229 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,041.16 Life Insurance Premium 19230 Remedy Temp 4,961.52 Temporary Employment Services 19231 RMS Engineering 8 Design, Inc. 875.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents 19232 RPM Electric Motors 1,618.76 Electric Motor Repair 19233 Laidlaw Environmental Services 13,530.00 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 19234 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 1,850.00 Sewer Repair 19235 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 758.68 Mechanical Supplies 19236 Sartorius Corporation 85.00 Lab Equipment Service 19237 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 154.71 Specialty Gases 19238 City of Seal Beach 75.99 Water Use 19239 Sears Industrial Sales 1,524.03 Mechanical Supplies 19240 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 9,304.45 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 19241 Second-Sun 422.95 Light Fixtures 19242 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,049.04 Tools 19243 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 962.01 Tools/Hardware 19244 Siemon, Larsen 8 Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19245 SoftChoice 6,359.41 Software 19246 Sonic Systems, Inc. 22.899.71 8 Process Computer Workstations Page 7 of 9 • Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19247 Southern California Air Cond. Dist. 197.90 Electrical Supplies 19248 Southern California Edison 5,384.12 Power 19249 Sprint 32.70 Long Distance Telephone Service 19250 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 55.20 Pump Supplies 19251 Sterling Art 140.02 Art Supplies 19252 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 445.18 Office Supplies 19253 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 19264 StudloVisla 2,610.00 Computer Consulting Services 19255 Summit Steel 2,734.49 Metal 19256 Sun-Belt Landscape& Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 19257 Suncor Marine& Industrial 43.25 Lab Supplies 19258 Sunset Ford 69.51 Truck Supplies 19259 Sunset Industrial Parts 140.29 Mechanical Supplies 19260 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 19261 SCCWRP 14.00 Registration 19262 Robert J.Thiede 160.00 Training Expense .+ 19263 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 389.41 Mechanical Supplies .°f. 19264 Time Motion Tools 258.63 Tools 's 19265 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 145.41 Locks&Keys tr 19266 Tran Consulting Engineers 8.812.50 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 19267 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 259.59 Truck Supplies 19268 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 68.33 Truck Supplies 19289 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 338.00 Lab Services 19270 TCH Associates, Inc. 266.82 Lab Supplies 19271 Teksystems 8,915.00 Temporary Employment Services 19272 Ultra Scientific 920.35 Lab Supplies 19273 The Unisource Corporation 982.48 Office Supplies 19274 United Parcel Service 878.03 Parcel Services 19275 Unocal Corporation 74.17 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 19278 UCT 250.00 Registration 19277 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,373.25 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 19278 Valley Cities Supply Company 138.78 Plumbing Supplies 19279 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 191.59 Electrical Supplies 19280 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.624.58 Vision Service Premium 19281 VWR Scientific 10,891.22 Lab Supplies 19282 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,623.84 Security Guards 19283 Water Environment Federation 1,435.00 Software 19284 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 42.67 Electrical Supplies 19285 Westmx International 63.44 Truck Supplies 19286 Whessoe Varec,Inc. 203.46 Valves Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 19287 Wyatt Data Services 538.00 Publications 19288 Xerox Corporation 4,721.29 Copier Leases 19289 Xircom 404.06 Computer Supplies 19290 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 7,903.80 Construction 5-41-1 19291 CNA Trust 878.20 Construction 541-1 19292 Pave West 17,667.90 Construction P1 40-3 19293 Veme's Plumbing 3.695.00 Plumbing Supplies 19294 Shabbir S. Basrai 619.04 Training&Meeting Expense Reimb. 19295 Michael J. Chester 449.95 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19296 Darrell S. Ennis 250.00 Meeting Expense 19297 Jeffrey A.Esber 315.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19298 Danny S. Evangelista 250.00 Training Expense 19299 Norbert Gala 1,097.25 Training Expense Reimb. 19300 Rick J.Hannappel 556.40 Training Expense Reimb. 19301 Michelle R. Hetherington 416.21 Training Expense Reimb. �n 19302 Lawrence P. Kraemer 496.27 Training Expense Reimb. r 19303 Charles G. Lee 990.48 Meeting Expense Reimb. w 19304 Robert J.Thiede 250.00 Training Expense Reimb. y 19305 Lisa L.Tomko 155.00 Training Expense Reimb. 19306 Orange County Sanitation District 849.62 Petty Cash Reimb. 19307 County of Orange 870.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19308 Reliastar 7,936.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 19309 City of Irvine 2,429.44 Permit Fee 7-27 19310 JLM General Contracting& Environ. Svcs. 15,998.40 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair 19311 JLM General Contracting&Environ. Svcs. 4,507.10 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,421,821.48 Wire Transfer Payments Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. $ 83,114.16 Quarterly Liquidity on Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 83,114.16 Payroll Disbursements 13686-13822 Employee Paychecks $ 179,826.93 Biweekly Payroll 4121/99 13823.13824 Employee Paychecks 39,353.64 Termination 36864-37305 Direct Deposit Statements 634,695.52 Biweekly Payroll 4/7/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 853.876.09 Total Claims Paid 4/16199-4130199 $ 4.358.811.73 Page 9of9 •- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I roed.ofo�r. 6123/99 AGENDA REPORT Item NumEer ReV.ber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NIA BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES NIA CEQA FINDINGS NIA \VW�Vvlet\vry.AaVUN] WWOS%W FILESItleMn dEx a.m..a: samse Page 1 ATTACHMENTS r 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 5/1/99 -- 5/15/99 & 5/16/99 — 5/30/99. BA 14Md� WlN dlaft Nub OIMFILESYA VOW R.w.a. erwree Page 2 S Claims Paid From 611/99 to 6115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 19316 National Plant Services, Inc. $ 128,026.25 Vacuum Truck Services 19317 Orange County Sanitation District 405,226.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 19318 Southern California Edison 48,492.89 Power 19319 Voided Check - - 19320 Portion Industries 13,946.57 Instrument Parts&Supplies 19321 Voided Check - - 19322 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 19323 SNI Building News 1,920.00 Registration 19324 Career Track Seminars MS2 79.00 Seminar Registration 19325 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registration 19326 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 19327 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 1.016.50 Electrical Supplies 19328 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 15.65 Plumbing Supplies 19329 Cooper Energy Services 3,000.00 Registration 19330 County Wholesale Electric Co. 902.05 Electrical Supplies 19331 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 19332 CWEA Annual Conference 115.00 Conference Registration 19333 Court Order 511.07 Wage Garnishment 19334 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 19335 Freight Masters 41.10 Freight 19336 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 19337 GTE California 59.64 Telephone Services 19338 Home Depot 55.00 Small Hardware 19339 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 19340 Airgas Direct Intl- IPCO Safety Div. 77.17 Safety Supplies 19341 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 517.44 Safety Supplies 19342 Lessons in Leadership 11,063.00 Registration 19343 Maintenance Technology Corp. 694.86 Welding Supplies 19344 Matt Chlor, Inc. 2,010.61 Valves 19346 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 882.81 Plumbing Supplies 19346 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 579.83 Tools 19347 Motion Industries 55.14 Pump Supplies 19348 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association 50.00 Membership 19349 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 19350 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19351 OCB Reprographics 81.84 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19352 OCEA 615.07 Dues Deduction 19353 Pacific Bell 18.35 Telephone Services 19354 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 511199 to 6/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19355 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19356 Peace Officers Council of CA 628.00 Dues Deduction 19357 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 400.31 Tools/Hardware 19358 ThirdWave 19,6W.00 Professional Services-Document Management Project 19359 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 411.31 Mechanical Supplies 19360 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 19361 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,719.00 Lab Supplies 19362 Nicholas J.Arhontes 133.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19363 Barclays Bank PLC 87.710.85 COP Letter of Credit 19364 RPI1Bio Gro 78.651.15 Residuals Removal MO4.26-95 19365 Bristol Systems, Inc. 27,266.33 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 19366 Brown&Caldwell 151.000.87 Engineering Services Pi-37&J-35-1 19367 Carollo Engineers 113.320.04 Engineering Services P1.38-2,J-254&J-39 19366 Finnigan MAT Western Region 59,682.06 Lab Instrument-Gas Chromalograph 19369 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 42,512.83 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19370 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 125,185.84 Engineering Services J42 19371 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 98.282.42 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 19372 ThirdWave 36,930.17 Professional Services-Document Management Project 19373 Tule RanchlMagan Farms 99,450.85 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19374 Ark Construction Company 62,873.28 Construction Pl-444 19375 KPRS Construction Services, Inc. 29,497.95 Construction P2-65 19376 Southern Contracting Company 31,458.00 Construction P247-1 19377 Vortex Industries, Inc. 516.00 Door Repair 19378 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,963.31 Long Distance Telephone Services 19379 AccuStandard, Inc. 73.25 Lab Supplies 19380 Advanced Cooling Technologies 650.00 Electrical Service 19361 Advanced Sealing &Supply Co., Inc. 1,535.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19382 Aidce Systems, Inc. 4,374.60 Electrical Supplies 19383 Air-Weigh 62.19 Publication 19384 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 19385 Airgas Lyons Safety 635.08 Safety Supplies 19386 All American Asphalt 9,364.52 Street Repair-Baker St.&Arroyo Ave. 19387 American Compensation Assoc. 160.00 Membership 19386 American Management Association Int'I. 159.00 Registration 19389 American National Standards Institute 116.00 Safety Supplies 19390 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 330.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 19391 Apex Training&Development 119.95 Publication 19392 Appleons Employment Service 2,742.67 Temporary Employment Services 19393 Applied Industrial Technology 1.752.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19394 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 617.00 Vacuum Truck Services Page of c Claims Paid From 6/1199 to 6115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19395 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 19396 Awards&Trophies By Bea 96.96 Plaques 19397 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3.20 Telephone Services 19398 AWSI 322.95 Department of Transportation Training Program 19399 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 5,940.97 Telephone Installation 19400 Battery Specialties 145.46 Batteries 19401 BtoSouroe Solutions, Inc. 9,083.55 Consulting Service-Biosolids&Watershed 19402 Boot Barn 150.74 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 19403 Borthvrick, Guy,Thibault, Inc. 750.00 Professional Services-P2-46-1 19404 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,703.69 Engineering Services 3-38-1,6-13&7-27 19406 Burke Engineering Co. 354.02 Electrical Supplies 19406 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,612.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 19407 Buy.Com 8,212.23 Computer Supplies 19408 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 114.00 Rope 19409 Cal-Glass, Inc. 85.13 Lab Equipment Service 19410 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,127.21 Pump Supplies 19411 Calolympic Safety 292.22 Safety Supplies 19412 Chemical Engineering 59.00 Subscription 19413 Coast Fire Equipment 216.58 Service Agreement 19414 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 199.97 Lab Supplies 19415 Computers America, Inc. 1,038.74 Computer Supplies 19416 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 2,711.68 Electrical Supplies 19417 Consolidated Plastics Company 33.26 Lab Supplies 19418 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 368.80 Plumbing Supplies 19419 Contractors Equipment Co-Remit to 655.99 Tools 19420 Cooper Cameron Corporation 36.80 Engine Supplies 19421 Corporate Express Imaging 2,551.53 Misc. Computer Supplies 19422 Corporate Express 455.01 Office Supplies 19423 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 383.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19424 County of Orange 116.50 Permit Fees 19425 County Wholesale Electric Co. 7,484.47 Electrical Supplies 19426 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 19427 CWEA-Workshop 140.00 Registration 19428 Daily Pilot 56.25 Notices&Ads 19429 Datavault 101.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 19430 David's Tree Service 1,450.00 Tree Removal 19431 Dawson Company 1,886.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19432 Del Mar Analytical 2,492.00 Biosolids Analysis 19433 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 4,169.93 (1)Latitude Notebook Computer&Server Rack Installation 19434 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 1,000.45 Valves Page 3 of 8 Clahns Paid From 511199 to 5115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19435 Robert F.Driver Associates 20,100.00 Excess Workers Compensation Insurance MO 6-10-92 19436 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 715.41 Paint Supplies 19437 DGA Consultants, Inc. 2,896.18 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 19438 Eagle Distribution 35.36 Vehicle Repair 19439 Electra-Bond 4,902.63 Mechanical Supplies 19440 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. 2,435.15 5-User License DB Artisan for Oracle Software 19441 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 19442 Environmental Express 1,655.00 Lab Supplies 19443 Environmental Resources Associates 247.40 Lab Supplies 19444 Environmental Sampling Supply 367.05 Lab Supplies 19445 Eye Wire 108.99 Software 19446 F.J.Johnson, Inc. 495.00 Electrical Service 19447 FedEx Corporation 109.20 Air Freight 19448 Fibertron 796.12 Fiber Optic Cable 19449 Filter Supply Company 438.98 Filters 19450 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 162.26 Lab Supplies 19451 Fluid Dynamics 1,233.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental 19452 Fountain Valley Camera 41.65 Photo Supplies 19453 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 960.01 Paint Supplies 19454 Fry's Electronics 275.66 Computer Supplies 19455 G. E. Supply 3.219.78 Electric Parts 19456 Gardner-Denver do Misco 244.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19457 Ganatt-Callahan Company 4,170.47 Chemicals 19458 GTE California 3,297.33 Telephone Services 19459 Genium Publishing Corp. 405.20 Publication 19460 Global Engineering&Management 6,170.00 Consulting Services-Asset Management Program 19461 Golden Bell Products 2,196.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 19462 WW Grainger, Inc. 177.23 Compressor Supplies 19463 Graseby STl 1.882.96 Engine Supplies 19464 Graybar Electric Company 2.368.35 Electrical Supplies 19465 Great American Printing Co. 177.81 Printing Service 19466 Haaker Equipment Company 158.36 Truck Supplies 19467 Hach Company 2,870.35 Lab Supplies 19468 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 1,442.80 Catering Services 19469 Hewlett-Packard 1.575.17 Lab Supplies 19470 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 1.485.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 19471 Home Depot 534.91 Small Hardware 19472 Holey Equipment Company 5,385.35 Hot Water Pressure Washer 19473 Hub Auto Supply 222A6 Truck Parts Page 4 of 8 c Claims Paid From 5/1199 to 6115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19474 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 1,569.75 Software Licenses 19475 City of Huntington Beach 14,477.93 Water Use 19476 HR Solutions, Inc. 742.75 Human Resources Participation Survey 19477 Imaging Plus, Inc. 16,359.57 (1)HP large Format Printer with Accessories 19478 StateNet 185.00 Online Service 19479 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 3.45 Truck Supplies 19480 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 19481 ISCO C/O MRC Technology 4,633.25 20 Sampler Batteries 19482 Island Press 40.61 Ceiling Tile 19483 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 19484 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 465.39 Safety Supplies 19485 J&B Auto Parts 386.93 Auto Parts&Supplies 19488 James Martin&Co. 15,655.00 Professional Services-Data Integration Project 19487 Jamison Engineenng, Inc. 2,02BA7 Misc.Construction Services 19488 Jay's Catering 1.054.20 Catering Services 19489 Jobtrak 90.00 Notices&Ads 19490 Johnstone Supply 1,014.48 Electrical Supplies 19491 K.P. Lindstrom 8,182.92 Envir. Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 19492 Kelly Paper 49.89 Paper 19493 Industrial Distribution Group 214.76 Tools 19494 Krieger&Stewart, Inc. 6,492.00 Professional Services P1-64 19495 KADV Inremational 2,500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental 19496 Lab Support 5.492.81 Temporary Employment Services 19497 Labware, Inc. 4,000.00 Registration 19498 LaserAll Corporation 910.73 Service Agreement 19499 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Books&Publications 19500 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 534.00 Architectural Services 19501 Los Angeles Freightliner 383.04 Meter 19502 Mar Vac Electronics 23.32 Instrument Supplies 19503 Marcy Rothenberg 1.485.00 Professional Services-Writer for the Internet Project 19504 Marinovich Trawl Co., Inc. 1.650.00 Trawl Net 19505 Masune Company 67.65 Safety Supplies 19506 MasTec Network Services 4,953.62 Electrial Supplies 19507 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 9,190.86 Tools 19508 Mec Analytical System 650.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 19509 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10,800.00 Mechanical Repairs 19510 Mission Uniform Service 3,153.08 Uniform Rentals 19511 Motion Industries 187.21 Pump Supplies 19512 MotoPhoto 83.95 Photographic Services 19513 MPS Photographic Services 1,218.89 Photographic Services Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 5/1/99 to 6/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19514 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 19515 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 19516 City of Newport Beach 30.61 Water Use 19517 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12,094.79 Lubncant/Diesel Fuel 19518 NAS Associates, Inc. 1,131.75 Lab Services 19519 NARC Register 275.00 Registration 19520 Network Solutions Group 2.970.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade 19521 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,780.71 Office Supplies 19522 Interior Resources and/or Oft Pavilion 560.00 Office Furniture 19523 Olsson Construction, Inc. 5.650.00 Construction P2-55 19524 Oracle Corporation-Support/Sales 2,692.69 Software 19525 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 558.92 Electrical Supplies 19528 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,049.51 Fittings 19527 Oxygen Service Company 1,333.71 Specialty Gases 19528 OCB Reprographics 104.95 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19529 OCCABA 45.00 Membership-Orange County Compensation&Benefits Assoc. 19530 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 333.72 Electrical Supplies 19531 Pacific Mechanical Supply 98.55 Plumbing Supplies 19532 Panametrics 10.878.92 Meter 19533 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 370.96 Mechanical Supplies 19534 Parts Unlimited 168.21 Truck Supplies 19535 Perlman&Duncan 5,230.16 Legal Services-OCSD No. 3 vs. United Technologies 19536 Petco Animal Supplies 332.91 Lab Supplies 19537 Pickard Design 2,867.66 Publication-Central Power Generation Brochure 19538 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 19,828.46 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19539 Pinkerton Systems Integration 4,727.70 Security Card Reader System 19540 Pctydyne,Inc. 12.121.32 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19541 Power Pumps, Inc. 76.13 Pump Supplies 19542 PC Expanders 5,573.00 Document Scanner 19543 Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. 496.02 Lab Supplies 195" Red Wing Shoes 233.61 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 19545 Regents of University of Calif. 145.00 Registration 19546 Remedy 3.542.66 Temporary Employment Services 19547 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 844.59 Motor Repairs 19548 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 4,499.61 Basket Strainers for Polymer Use 19549 RPM Electric Motors 2,058.90 Electric Motor Repair 19550 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 655.49 Paint Supplies 19551 Santa Fe Industrial Products. Inc. 250.50 Mechanical Supplies 19552 Second-Sun 380.08 Light Fixtures 19553 Sentex Systems, Inc. 6,963.52 Instrument Maint. Services Page of c Claims Paid From 511/99 to 5116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19554 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 2,257.12 Tools 19555 Shasta Electric LP 659.36 Construction Services-Security Gate Arm Foundation Improvement 19556 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 604.39 Tools/Hardmm 19557 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 19,493.82 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19558 Snap-On Technical Training 816.00 Registration 19669 Southern California Edison 6.049.18 Power 19560 Southern California Water 128.84 Water Use 19561 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 19562 Summit Steel 53.37 Metal 19563 Sunset Ford 487.54 Truck Supplies 19564 Textile Engineering Associates 6,875.90 Valves 19565 The Mernwood Corporation 8,703.71 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 19566 The Register 1,339.20 Notices&Ads 19567 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,154.11 Mechanical Supplies 19568 rime Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 19589 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 139.78 Locks&Keys 19570 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 162.70 Truck Supplies 19571 Teksystems 12,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 19572 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters 19573 U.S. Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 19574 Unocal Corporation 25.89 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 19575 Valley Cities Supply Company 822.00 Plumbing Supplies 19576 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 97.62 Electrical Supplies 19577 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 10.880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 19578 Veme's Plumbing 385.00 Plumbing Supplies 19579 Village Nurseries 82.30 Landscaping Supplies 19580 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 21,296.82 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 19581 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 3,388.59 Lab Supplies 19582 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards 19583 Waxie Sanitary Supply 714.71 Janitorial Supplies 19584 West Group 285.64 Subscription 19585 Western States Chemical, Inc. 15,742.48 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 19586 Whessoe Varec cJo Pacific Process Equip. 5,361.65 Valves 19587 Witeg Scientific 1.392.51 Lab Supplies 19588 Wyatt Data Services 658.00 Publication 19589 Xerox Corporation 12,962.04 Copier Leases 19590 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 99.16 Office Supplies 19591 Yeats Appliance Dolly Mfg 17.51 Mechanical Supplies 19592 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 599.03 Training Expense Reimb. 19593 Layne T. Baroldi 245.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 611199 to 6/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19594 Mark Castillo 144.60 Training Expense 19595 Chloe D. Dao 110.60 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19596 Michael D. Moore 298.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19597 Moira E. Sullivan 242.62 Training Expense Reimb. 19598 John W. Swindler 176.00 Meeting Expense 19599 Karen A.Tumbaugh 560.52 Employee Computer Loan Program 19600 County of Orange 405.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19601 Orange County Sanitation District 11,750.61 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 19602 Orange County Sanitation District 1,389.17 Petty Cash Reimb. 19603 Vortex industries, Inc. 44.231.27 Fiberglass Doors Installation Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,358,877.72 Payroll Disbursements 13825-13957 Employee Paychecks $ 167.991.87 Biweekly Payroll 5/5/99 13958-13958 Employee Paycheck 5.387.40 Termination 37306-37746 Direct Deposit Statements 630,743.52 Biweekly Payroll 5/5/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 804,102.79 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 151.691.57 May Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 202,864.14 May Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank 8 Trust Co. of Ca. $ 168,420.63 May Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 622,976.34 Total Claims Paid 511199-5/15199 $ 3,685,956.85 Page 8 of 8 c Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 5131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 19604 Orange County Sanitation District 6 396,021.94 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 19605 Southern California Edison 44,974.57 Power 19606 SAWPA 35,000.00 Nitrogen &Total Dissolved Solids Task Force 19607 Abesco 1,006.16 Hardware 19608 Alaska Sea Grant Program 70.00 Publication 19609 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 308.92 Mechanical Supplies 19610 American Society for Training&Development 139.00 Membership 19811 The Assoc.of Records Managers&Admin. 50.00 Membership 19612 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 19613 Builders Book, Inc. 378.86 Publication 19614 Buy.Com 34.09 Computer Supplies 19615 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registration 19616 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 19617 Court Trustee 572.60 Wage Garnishment 19618 CSMFO 80.00 Meeting Expense 19619 Court Order 811.07 Wage Garnishment 19620 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 19621 GTE California 5.287.05 Telephone Services 19622 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 203.75 Catering Services 19623 Information Resources 250.00 Personnel Services 19624 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 19625 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 86.13 Safety Supplies 19626 Jays Catering 53.67 Catering Services 19627 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 237.30 Safety Supplies 19628 Catherine W. Landis 55.59 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19629 Los Angeles Times 176.42 Notices&Ads 19630 Nor AM Productions, Inc. 395.00 Publication 19631 Orange County Family Support 761.50 Wage Garnishment 19632 Orange County Forum 160.DD Membership 19633 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 19634 OCEA 598.57 Dues Deduction 19635 Pacific Bell 48.08 Telephone Services 19636 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 19637 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 19638 Peace Officers Council of CA 819.00 Dues Deduction 19639 Remedy Temp 2,948.25 Temporary Employment Services 19640 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 5,499.53 Tools/Hardware 19641 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19642 So. Cal. Gas Company 14,407.29 Natural Gas Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 6/16/99 to 5131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19643 Sun Healthcare Group 1,867.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 19644 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 19645 Water Environment Federation 49.50 Publication 19646 Richard A. Castillon 690.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19647 James R. Davidson 347.54 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19648 Mike J. Herrera 1,227.64 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19649 Andrei loan 282.64 Training Expense Reimb. 19650 Robert Dolan 840.96 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19651 Ken A.Sakamoto 518.37 Training Expense Reimb. 19652 Yvonne L.Schwab 345.72 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19653 Robert J.Thiede 463.14 Training Expense Reimb. 19654 Michael I.Zedek 363.08 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19655 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design 12,600.00 Human Resources Service 19656 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 56,028.00 Engineering Services P146-2 19657 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 77,225.50 Engineering Services J40-3 19658 Carollo Engineers 54.363.76 Engineering Services P2-60 19659 Delta Dental 37,533.76 Dental Insurance Plan 19660 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 54,126.00 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 19661 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 30,982.10 Consulting Services-FIS Impl. &Support 19662 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 43,130.81 Construction Services-Lab Gas Line Rehab. 19663 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 49.137.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 19664 Lee&Ro, Inc. 26.280.61 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 19665 Voided Check - - 19666 Pacific Investment Management Co. 121.663.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 19667 Pacificare of Ca. 37,709.39 Health Insurance Premium 19668 Painewebber Incorporated 69,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 19669 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 156,603.83 Engineering Services J42 19670 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 28,322.02 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 19671 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 37,506.18 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 19672 SPEC Services, Inc. 105,787.69 Engineering Services J-33-1 19673 United HealthCare 256,881.30 Medical Health Insurance 19674 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 46,594.60 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 19675 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 68.685.75 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 19676 Advance Constructors, Inc. 125.487.90 Construction 541-1 19677 Mike Pdich&Sons 382,896.0o Construction 6-12 19678 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 45,461.88 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 19679 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 46,389.78 Engineering Services 240 19680 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 134,640.00 Construction 2-34R 19681 A-Plus Systems 2.387.28 Notices&Ads 19682 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1.250.00 Software Subscription Page 2 of 8 ^a Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19683 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 2,506.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19684 Aearo Company 2,424.00 Safety Supplies 19685 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 19686 Airborne Express 219.00 Air Freight 19687 Appleone Employment Service 8,664.35 Temporary Employment Services 19688 Applied Industrial Technology 597.65 Electrical Parts&Supplies 19689 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,130.00 Vacuum Truck Services 19690 Asbury Environmental Services 813.00 Waste Oil Removal 19691 Audio Video Supply, Inc. 345.27 Door Repair 19692 Awards&Trophies By Bea 862.81 Plaques 19693 ACIIIGIES Workshop 25.00 Registration 19694 AMAliPadgett-Thompson 395.00 Registration 19695 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 437.71 Telephone Services 19696 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 28.41 Telephone Services 19697 AWSI 230.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 19698 Battery Specialties 247.39 Batteries 19699 Bongard Communications, Ltd. 116.00 Printing Service 19700 Boot Barn 118.42 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 19701 Bristol Systems, Inc. 22,767.50 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 19702 Brown&Caldwell 3,667.15 Engineering Services Pl-37 19703 Burke Engineering Co. 1,862.16 Electrical Supplies 19704 Buy.Cam 5,571.82 Computer Supplies 19705 BNI Building News 1.096.67 Publication 19706 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 19707 Caltrol, Inc. 1,247.15 Valves 19708 Cad Warren&Co. - 150.57 Insurance Claims Administrator 19709 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 197.24 Office Furniture 19710 Charles P. Crowley Co. 349.31 Instrument Parts 19711 Chemical Transfer Company,Inc. 59.00 Freight 19712 City of Fountain Valley 11.951.88 Water Use 19713 Coastal Zone 99 Coordinator 285.00 Registration 19714 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 57.77 Lab Supplies 19715 Compressor Components OF California 1.583.93 Pump Supplies 19716 Computers America,Inc. 12,622.89 Computer Supplies 19717 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,233.50 Electrical Supplies 19718 Converse Consultants 627.70 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 19719 Convey Development 340.00 Software Maim. 19720 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,583.26 Engine Supplies 19721 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1.432.00 Copier Lease 19722 Corporate Express 1.402.49 Office Supplies Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 6116199 to 6131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19723 Cost Containment Solutions 170.58 Worker's Comp.Services 19724 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 375.89 Truck Parts 19725 Costco Wholesale Membership 35.00 Membership 19726 County of Orange 612.50 Permit Fees 19727 County of Orange 627.56 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19728 County Wholesale Electric Co. 510.52 Electrical Supplies 19729 CR&R.Inc. 2,835.00 Container Rentals 19730 Damon S.Williams Associates, L.L.C. 8,975.52 Professional Services-Benchmarking Study 19731 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 9,895.72 (1)Dell Computer Workstation, (1)HP Printer& 17 Drives 19732 DeZudk C/O Misce/South West 13,802.14 Valves 19733 Diamond H Recognition 323.42 Employee Service Awards 19734 Dover Elevator Company 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 19735 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 1.211.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 19736 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1,063.84 Paint Supplies 19737 DGA Consultants, Inc. 16,410.28 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 19738 E.V. Holt Construction 3,500.00 Auto Shop Engine Analyzer 19739 Employment Development Dept. 2,536.84 Reimbursable Unemployment Insurance 19740 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 19741 Environmental Express 531.75 Lab Supplies 19742 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 910.20 Lab Supplies 19743 Executive Excellence 5,000.00 Human Resources Service 19744 ENS Resources, Inc. 8,381.38 Professional Services-Legislative 19745 Faxpress, Inc. 1,616.25 Office Supplies 19746 FedEx Corporation 217.66 Air Freight 19747 Fibenron 328.87 Fiber Optic Cable 19748 Filter Supply Company 8.111.34 Filters 19749 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 658.32 Lab Supplies 19750 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,610.15 Pump Supplies 19751 Fluid Handling Systems 1.720.36 Internet Service 19752 Fountain Valley Camera 34.38 Photo Supplies 19753 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 122.84 Paint Supplies 19754 Franklin Covey 1,889.45 Office Supplies 19755 Fry's Electronics 250.87 Computer Supplies 19756 FLW Inc. 816.23 Electrical Supplies 19757 FLW Service Corp.South 209.72 Instrument Supplies 19758 G. E. Supply .5,819.36 Electric Parts 19759 Ganahl Lumber Company 29.32 Lumber/Hardware 19760 Gardner-Denver c/o Misco 81.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 19761 Gamatt-Callahan Company 1,926.03 Chemicals Page 4 of 8 ^� �� Claims Paid From 5116199 to 5/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19762 GTE California 677.62 Telephone Services 19763 Goldenwest Window Service 1.798.00 Wndow Cleaning Service 19764 WIN Grainger, Inc. 239.27 Compressor Supplies 19765 Graphic Distributors 89.22 Photographic Supplies 19766 Graseby STI 367.52 Engine Supplies 19767 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 147.40 Janitorial Supplies 19768 GBC (General Binding Corp) 996.69 Office Supplies 19769 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 762.00 Instrument Supplies 19770 Haaker Equipment Company 3.125.85 Truck Supplies 19771 Harbour Engineering Group 11,441.40 Pump Supplies 19772 Harold Primrose Ice 112.00 Ice 19773 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 168.28 Plumbing Supplies 19774 Harting 8 Associates 3.540.00 Professional Services-Process Control Software Standards 19775 Hatch 8 Kirk Inc. 985.00 Truck Supplies 19776 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 797.10 Catering Services 19777 Hilton, Famkopf 8 Hobson,L.L.C. 2,035.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 19778 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,009.36 Mainl.Services-Sewer Cleaning 19779 Home Depot 165.98 Small Hardware 19780 Hub Auto Supply 109.79 Truck Parts 19781 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 271.59 Truck Supplies 19782 Intellisys Group, Inc. 161.63 Computer Supplies 19783 Irvine Ranch Water District 46.82 Water Use 19784 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,209.93 Safety Supplies 19785 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 2.040.00 Training Expenses 19786 Jay's Catering 1,157.71 Catering Services 19787 Yokogawa Corporation of America 1,801.99 Instrument Supplies 19788 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 23,590.07 Medical Insurance Premium 19789 Industrial Distribution Group 425.73 Tools 19790 Lab Support 3,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 19791 Lessons in Leadership 299.00 Registration 19792 Leybold Vacuum Products, Inc. 200.80 Lab Supplies 19793 Linkage, Inc. 5.330.53 Registration 19794 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2,470.00 Architectural Services 19795 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 1,846.90 Engineering Services 2-37 19798 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,950.48 Welding Supplies 19797 Mar Vac Electronics 1.62 Instrument Supplies 19798 MasTec Network Services 4,683.70 Communication Service 19799 Mc Junkin Cory—Ontano Branch 118.20 Plumbing Supplies 19800 Mec Analytical System 850.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 19801 Mesa Muffler 127.75 Truck Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 51`16/99 to 6/31/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19802 Mission Abrasive Supplies 478AI Tools&Supplies 19803 Mission Uniform Service 3,224.60 Uniform Rentals 19804 Mitchell Instrument Co. 70.00 Instruments 19805 Monitor Labs, Inc. 978.93 Instrument Maint. 19806 Motion Industries 94.94 Pump Supplies 19807 MotoPhoto 36.02 Photographic Services 19808 MPS Photographic Services 5.93 Photographic Services 19809 MSA C/O Mag Systems 169.03 Safety Supplies 19810 National Fire Protection Association 450.00 Membership 19811 National Information Data Center 48.90 Publication 19812 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 15,910.00 Registration-Mechanical Training 19813 Nautical Software 49.00 Software 19814 Network Construction Services 6,891.93 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project 19815 Network Solutions, Inc. 4,400.00 Communication Cables @ Plant 1 Gates 19816 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 980.00 Training Registration-Computer 19817 Nextel Communications 892.20 Cellular Phones&Air Time 19818 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 736.72 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 19819 Office Depot Business Services Div. 626.78 Office Supplies 19820 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 403.70 Plumbing Supplies 19821 Ortiz Fire Protection 1.203.00 Service Agreement 19822 Oxygen Service Company 2,501.82 Specialty Gases 19823 OCB Reprographics 387.94 Printing Service-Spec P-173 19824 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 317.04 Electrical Supplies 19825 Pacific Bell 1.04428 Telephone Services 19826 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.878.31 Plumbing Supplies 19827 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 987.60 Mechanical Supplies 19828 Pagenet 1,871.84 Rental Equipment 19829 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 149.76 Tires 19830 Parts Unlimited 369.76 Truck Supplies 19831 Penn State 535.00 Registration 19832 Perkin Elmer Service 1.719.74 Lab Supplies 19833 Permaseal 409.71 Lube Oil 19834 Pinkerton Systems Integration 4,646.03 Security Card Reader System 19835 Polydyne,Inc. 22,430.89 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 19836 Power Electm Supply Co., Inc. 585.42 Electrical Supplies 19837 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin. 19838 Public Financial Management, Inc. 2,500.00 Financial Advisor Services 19839 PIHRA 100.00 Notices&Ads 19840 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,324.22 Trash Removal 19841 Randolph Austin Co. 132.27 Lab Supplies Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 6116/99 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19842 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 721.14 Electrical Supplies 19843 Remedy Temp 2.377.60 Temporary Employment Services 19844 RBF Engineers 260.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 19845 Robinson Fertilizer Co., Inc. 1,330.78 Groundskeeping Supplies 19846 RPM Electric Motors 599.32 Electric Motor Repair 19847 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 5%92 Paint Supplies 19848 Safelite Glass Corp. 173.01 Auto Supplies 19849 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 370.65 Mechanical Supplies 19850 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 191.79 Specialty Gases 19851 Sears Industrial Sales 675.37 Mechanical Supplies 19852 Seaventures 5,270.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 19853 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 5,897.87 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 19854 Second-Sun 951.64 Light Fixtures 19855 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 195.64 Tools 19856 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,829.54 Tools/Hardware 19857 Sloan Electric Company 15,635.46 Motor Repairs 19858 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 221.28 Plumbing Supplies 19859 SoftChoice 951.66 Software 19860 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 150.00 Emission Fees 19861 Sparkletts 2,070.94 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 19862 Sprint 44.70 Long Distance Telephone Service 19863 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 917.91 Office Supplies 19864 Street Smart Professional Equipment 862.00 Safety Equipment 19865 StudioVisia 1,890.00 Computer Consulting Services 19866 Summit Steel 1,110.91 Metal 19867 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4.420.00 Landscape Maint. 19868 Sunset Ford 264.81 Truck Supplies 19869 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals 19870 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 19871 Thomas M. Dawes 3,315.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 19872 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,658.02 Mechanical Supplies 19873 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 271.50 Locks&Keys 19874 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 1,042.75 Truck Supplies 19875 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 132.46 Truck Supplies 19876 Teksystems 6,040.00 Temporary Employment Services 19877 TPC Training Systems 11,286.62 Training Software 19878 United Parcel Service 517.15 Parcel Services 19879 V&A Consulting Engineers 4,987.84 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 19880 Valley Cities Supply Company 32&54 Plumbing Supplies 19881 Veme's Plumbing 2,557.56 Plumbing Supplies Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 5/16199 to 6131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 19882 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.448.88 Vision Service Premium 19883 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6.971.94 Lab Supplies 19884 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,083.04 Security Guards 19885 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 2.69 Electrical Supplies 19886 Western States Chemical, Inc. 20,284.99 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95 19887 Westrux International 60.75 Truck Supplies 19888 Windows NTAdministrator Report 178.00 Subscription 19889 WESTCAS 160.00 Registration 19890 Xemx Corporation 2,412.18 Copier Leases 19891 Xetex Incorporated 144.00 Electrical Supplies 19892 Zenon Environmental Systems 24,000.00 Professional Service-Biosolids Site 19893 CNA Trust 13.943.10 Construction 541-1 19894 Joven E.Alop 653.50 Training Expense Reimb. 19895 Marcus D. Dubois 1,78127 Training Expense Reimb. 19896 Victor M. Ferguson 798.02 Training Expense Reimb. 19897 Robert P.Ghirelli 236.00 Training Expense Reimb. 19898 L.Kevin Hadden 464.57 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19899 Rick J. Hannappel 556.40 Training Expense Reimb. 19900 James D. Herberg 188.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19901 Donald F. McIntyre 1,512.64 Meeting Expense Reimb. 19902 Michelle Tuchman 548.62 Communications Expense Reimb. 19903 Environmental Lab Accreditation Program 3,119.00 Lab Certification 19904 Orange County Sanitation District 1,594.51 Petty Cash Reimb. 19905 Richard D. Pleads 832.51 Employee Computer Loan Program 19906 County of Orange 675.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 19907 Blue Cross of California 132,000.00 Medical Insurance Premium Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,317,427.94 Payroll Disbursements 13959- 14091 Employee Paychecks $ 172,993.84 Biweekly Payroll 5119/99 14092. 14114 Directors'Paychecks $ 7,493.87 Payroll 5/17199 14115- 14115 Employee Paycheck 18,775.09 Termination 37747-38186 Direct Deposit Statements 637.977.31 Biweekly Payroll 5/19/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 837.240.11 Total Claims Paid 5/16199-5131/99 $ 4,154,668.05 Page 8 of 8 -- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mewing Date To ads. W/23199 AGENDA REPORT Item Numter Rem Number Io County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-07, selecting the annual change in California Per Capita Personal Income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing $50,026,000 as the annual GANN Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1999-00 for the Orange County Sanitation District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. SUMMARY This routine annual action appearing on the agenda adopts a resolution establishing the spending limit for"proceeds of taxes" in accordance with Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California. The District's actual appropriations are well below the limit. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) X\vy.Jmlvpen]al&uN Agenda RepdallM Board Agenda Redoft Mem10d- R,„,,,.. 1L Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Sample Resolution GGS:Ic H\ry.Nlga dal M A,da Raµv4UM"d�ReWft BdXem 10 E¢ .m 1. Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-07 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations limit of each local government agency shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year, adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population, except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the 1999-00 fiscal year, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors wishes to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1999-00 for the District. -1- NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for the Orange County Sanitation District, for fiscal year 1999-00, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1999-00 for the Orange County Sanitation District, as established in accordance with Section 7902(b) of the California Government Code is $50,026,000 which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1999-00, Section 3: That the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, has determined that the percent change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year would be the cost of living factor to be used in calculating the Orange County Sanitation District's appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1999-00. Section 4: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re- establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 23, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary _2_ FAHR COMMITTEE MeftmgDete r°B°.° ° �iz3i� AGENDA REPORT Iem Number Iem Numbe I I Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF DISTRICT'S OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF, AND IN ANTICIPATION OF, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES, FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE LONG-TERM BORROWING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-08, "Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures Made in Advance for 1999-00 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Term Financing." SUMMARY Adoption of the "Reimbursement Resolution" will allow the District to use proceeds from a future long-term borrowing to reimburse capital reserve funds which were used to fund District capital projects. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NIA BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) HMpNbYpwN.�MAe RUu IM BUN•ewN.R•pNROWPAwn 110 R.,,..e ertaxe Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Under provisions of U.S. Treasury Regulation 1.150-2, local public agencies may use proceeds from long-term borrowings to reimburse those capital reserve funds which were advanced to fund preliminary expenditures, such as design, engineering and similar costs, for capital projects. The Regulations permit up to 20% of the aggregate par amount of bond proceeds from a new issue to be used for reimbursement of preliminary project expenditures, providing the public agency has declared its intent to do so prior to debt issuance. As part of preparations for a new capital financing program to support the Strategic Plan Update Capital Improvement Program, it is necessary to update the District's intent to reimburse reserve funds. Adoption of the attached "Reimbursement Resolution" will ensure that the District can include monies in upcoming borrowings to reimburse reserve funds for expenditures made in advance of available COP proceeds. The Board of Directors has adopted similar Resolutions in 1997 and 1998. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 99-08 R"W151 I.and d A e.,da FePomN98Mem1 M'. a..;wd. ermree Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-08 DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN OF THE DISTRICT'S CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE FOR 1999-00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE LONG-TERM FINANCING A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TO BE REIMBURSED FROM FUTURE LONG-TERM FINANCING WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, by adoption of Resolution No. 94-81 on July 13, 1994; Resolution No. 97-28 on July 30, 1997; and Resolution No. 98- 32 on July 1, 1998, previously declared its official intent to reimburse its then existing capital reserve funds and accounts for certain expenditures made in advance of and in anticipation of issuing indebtedness for capital improvements to be acquired, constructed, or paid for, by or on behalf of the District during the Fiscal Year; and, WHEREAS, the District ("Issuer") intends to acquire and/or construct, or otherwise improve, certain capital improvements during Fiscal Year 1999-00, and later, all as more particularly described on Exhibit"A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, Issuer expects to pay certain expenditures (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") in connection with the Project prior to the issuance of indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project, on a long-term basis; and, WHEREAS, the Issuer reasonably expects that the debt obligations, in an amount not to exceed $100 million, will be issued, and that certain of the proceeds of such debt obligations will be used to reimburse the Issuer for Reimbursement Expenditures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 1 Section 1: That the Issuer finds and determines that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct. Section 2: That this Declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the U.S. Treasury Regulations. This Resolution Declaration does not bind the Issuer to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project. Section 3: That the Issuer hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness to reimburse itself for the Reimbursement Expenditures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held June 23, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary wions\19MOC 2 Y1111999 Exhibit A 11:54 AM Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or year Strategic Project Required Plan Estimated Project Deacription Number In Service Total Project Collection System Facilities Revenue Area 1 Santa Ana Trunk Sewer System Santa Ana Trunk Rehabilitation 1-17 2005 7,393.000 Greenville-Sullivan MH Rehabilitation 2013 873,000 Raitl Street MH Rehabilitation 2015 754.000 Lower Main-Broadway MH Rehabilitation 2018 952.000 General Miscellaneous Projects 2020 500.000 Subtotal Revenue Area 1 10,472,000 Revenue Area 2 Euclid Trunk Sewer System Euclid Trunk MH Rehabilitation 2-34-R 2000 102,000 Fullerton Purchase Improvements 2004 192,000 Euclid Relief Improvements-A 2-52 20N 12,213.000 Euclid Relief Improvements-8 2020 5,210,000 Newhom-Placentia Trunk Sewer System Abandonment of yorba Linda PS 242 2010 280.000 Nirwhope-Placentia Trunk Replacement 246 2007 12.745.000 Cypress Avenue Trunk Replacement 2-47 2009 3.380.000 Upper Newhope-Placentia MH Rehab 2009 1,746.000 Lower Newhope-Placemia MH Rehab 2011 2,222,000 Santa Ana River Trunk Sewer System Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer/PS Replaceml 2-24-1 20D2 2.076,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief-A 2-31 2005 11.789,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief-B 2-31 2010 12.975.000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Alignment 241 20D4 19,500,000 Taft Branch Improvements 2002 2,309,000 Carbon Canyon Dam Trunk Improvements 2-21-1 2002 5.009,OOD Atwood Subtrunk Improvements 2.50 2002 987,000 Lower SARI Interceptor Improvements 2015 19.617,000 South Anaheim MH Rehabilitation 2012 1,270,000 SARI Manhole MH Rehabilitation 2012 662,00D General Pump Station Improvements(10%) 2-37 2002 271.000 Miscellaneous Projects 2002 2,000.000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 2 116,5K000 Revenue Area 3 Bushard Trunk Sewer System Magnolia Trunk Rehabilitation 3.35-11 2001 2,559.000 Knott Trunk Sewer System Seal Beach Interceptor Sewer Rehab 3-11-R 2001 367,000 Miler-Holder Trunk Sewer 3-38-1 2002 10,000,000 Hoover Feeder Improvements 202D 542,000 6/1111999 Exhibit A 11 54 AM Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or Year Strategic Project Required Plan Estimated Project Description Number In Service Total Project West Side Relief Interceptor Improvements 2010 4,650,000 West Side Relief/Alamitos MH Rehab 2012 662,000 Knoll Interceptor MH Rehabilitation 2012 1.035,000 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Pump Station Improvements(14%) 2.37 2002 379.000 Miscellaneous Projects 2002 2,000,000 Nan Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 3 22.194,000 Revenue Area 5 Newport Beach Trunk Swear System Relocation of Lido PS 541-1 2000 331,000 Big Canyon Sewer Rehabilitation 643 2009 2,162,000 Back Bay Trunk Sewer Replacement 546 2002 8,100,000 Crystal Cove PS Improvements 2002 702,000 Bitter Point PS Improvements 2002 1,503.000 Balboa Trunk Rehabilitation 2008 3,968.000 General Pump Station Improvements(28%) 2.37 2002 759,000 Miscellaneous Projects 2002 3.000,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 6 20,645,000 Revenue Area 6 Baker-Main Trunk Sewer System Fairview Relief Sewer 6-12 2000 655,000 Watson St/California Ave Conversions 6.13 2005 2.048,000 OM"District 6"Parallel Trunk 6.14 2012 1,719,000 Dover Drive Parallel Sewer 6-15 2012 1,893,000 General Pump Station Improvements(6%) 2.37 2001 163.G00 Miscellaneous Projects 2001 500.000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 6 6,978,000 Revenue Area 7 Gisler-Redhlll Trunk Sewer System Racquet Hill PS Abandonment 7.14.3 2000 50,000 Covey Lane PS Abandonment 7.1" 2005 210.000 Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement 7.17 2000 237,000 Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 7-27 2001 6,343.000 "B"StreetfMitchell Sewer Replacement 7.28 2000 320.000 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Relocation 7-32 2005 5.908,000 Gsler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements 2002 5,704,000 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements-A 7.36 200E 2,626,000 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements-B 741 2005 5,049,000 Tustin Trunk Improvements 2004 2.596,000 Orange Trunk Improvements 7.39 2002 1.719,000 6/11y1999 Exhibit A 11:54 AM r Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or Year Strategic Project Required Plan Estimated Project Description Number In Service Total Project North Trunk Improvements 2002 372,000 West Trunk Improvements 2010 231,000 Lower Gisler-Redhill MH Rehab 2009 754.000 Upper Gisler-Redhill MH Rehab 2009 166,000 Baker-Main Trunk Sewer System Summer Interceptor MH Rehabilitation 7-21 2000 356.000 College PS Force Parallel Force Main 7-23-1 2002 1,655.000 Campus Drive Subtrunk Improvements 2010 507.000 College PS Improvements 2004 2,044,000 McCaw PS Improvements 2002 - General Pump Station Improvements(33%) 2-37 2002 894,000 Miscellaneous Rehabilitation of Local Sewers 2002 1,717.000 Miscellaneous Projects 2002 1,000,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 7 40.461.000 Revenue Area 11 Knott Trunk Sewer System Goldemvest Street Trunk Sewer Replavnnt 11-17-3 2001 3.250,000 Warner Avenue PS 11-18 2001 1.391,000 Heil Interceptor 11-20 2002 3,827,000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 11-22 2001 2,294,000 Huntington Beach Sewer Abandonment 11.23 2005 305.000 Edinger/Sol"Chica Trunk Improvements 2020 782,000 Miller-Holder Trunk sewer System Edinger PS Improvements 2010 1,191,000 Coast Trunk Sewer System Coast Trunk Rehabilitation 2009 1.994,000 General Pump Station Improvements(9%) 2.37 2002 244,000 Miscelaneous Projects 2002 3,000,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Revenue Area 11 18 268,000 Revenue Area 13 Santa Ana River Trunk Sewer System No Projects - Subtotal Revenue Area 13 Revenue Area 14 Santa Ana River Trunk Sewer System Miscellaneous Projects 200,000 Subtotal Revenue Area 14 200,000 Collection System Total 235.672.000 6/11/1999 Exhibit A 11:54 AM Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or Year Strategic Project Required Plan Estimated Project Description Number In Service Total Project Treatment and Disposal System Facilities Plant No. 1 Preliminary Treatment 2 Bar screens 2007 312,000 Headwams pumping(44 mgd) 2002 8.000,000 Headworks pumping(44 mgd) 2004 4,000.000 Headworks pumping(M mgd) 2007 4,000,000 Headworks pumping(M mgd) 2013 4,000,000 3 Gm chambers 2005 6.000.000 3 Grit chambers 2009 6,000.000 Primary Treatment 16 Primary clarifiers Pi-37 2003 60,800.000 10 Primary Clarifiers 2009 60,000.000 Secondary Treatment Rehabilitate 4 Trickling fitters 2D03 9,50 ,000 5 Trickling Filter Clarifiers 2D03 11,500.000 Solids Handling and Dewatering Automation of Solids Storage Facility P740 2001 718.000 2 Digesters 2004 14.600.000 4 Digesters 2008 29.200.000 7 Bell Filter Presses 2007 17.500,000 2 Belt Filter Presses 2012 5,000,000 5 Cake storage hoppers 20D7 39,000.000 1 Cake storage hopper 2012 7,800.000 Miscellaneous S Support Projects Chemical Facility Mods. P146-2 2000 1,163.000 Facilities Engineering Projects FE-P1 2020 21.000.000 Odor Control Enhancements 2016 6.000,000 Waste Sidestream Management 1 Clarifier for exist BFP under0ow(3 mgd) 20D4 1,320,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Plant No.1 317,422.000 Plant No.2 Preliminary Treatment Headworks Improvements P248 2004 13.643.000 3 Grit chambers 2005 4,650,000 Improvements to Influent Sampling System P2.75 2000 35,000 Secondary Treatment Secondary Plant Rehab. P2.74 2002 6,356,000 Solids Handling and Dewatering Dewalering Belt Press Rebuild SP-37 2002 605,000 Digesters 1-0 Rehab P2-39 2002 19,343.000 Solids Storage Facility P240 2001 11.723.000 2 Digesters 2011 15.400,000 1 Digester 2015 7,700,000 2 Cake storage hoppers(rehab) 2005 8,000,000 6/11f19% Exhibit A 11.54 AM Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or Yw Strate0k Project Requlred Plan Estimated Project Description Number In Service Total Projeet 2 Cake storage hoppers 2010 16,400,000 Utility Systems Electrical Fac.Mods&Safety Upgrades P2474 2001 2,532,000 High Pressure Compressed Air System P261 2000 287.000 Miscellaneous&Support Projects Facilities Engineering Projects FE-P2 202D 21,000,000 Odor Control Enhancements 2015 6,000.000 Disinfection facilities(25 mild) 2011 4,360,0O1) Waste Sidestream Management 1 Clarifier for BFP undertow(5 mgd) 2004 2,102,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Plant No.2 140,156,000 Interplant-Joint Works Interplant Facilities Bushard Trunk Improvements 1-2-4 2004 32.712.000 Disposal and Outfall Facilities Foster Pump Station(78-inch outfall) 2011 28,200,000 OutFall now;meter replacement J-66 2001 834,000 Place Holder for 12W Outfall not in Plan 5150,000 2015 Plant Automation&Computerization Computerbd Facilities Records&Drawings J-25 1 2001 3,376,000 Sec.Treatment Montioring&Control Sys.Upgrade J-314 2000 1.240.000 Power Monitoring&Control System J-33-3 2001 3.835.000 Plant Reinvention/Automation 142 2003 22.934.000 Fiber Optic Upgrades 2000 204.000 Standardize P1 &P2 Field Fiber Optic Terminal Junction 2000 95.000 Safety&Security Improvements Confined Space Personnel Retreival System J49 2001 213,000 Support Facilities Collection Facilties Depot&Shops J60 2000 709.000 Utility System Improvements Electrical Power System Studies J-254 2004 12,438.000 Eledrical Power Sys Single-ine Diagrams J-256 2001 3Z%,000 Standby Former&Reliability Mods. J-33-1 2001 15.001.000 Cable Tray Improvements at P1 &P2 J47 2004 10,000,000 Imps to CenGen Starting Air Sys. J63 2000 100.000 CenGen wasteheal boilers mods. J-64 2000 150,000 CenGen gas mixing sys imps J68 2000 222,000 Miscellaneous Projects Revision of Standard Specs. J44 2000 150.000 Closed bop cooling&imps J62 200D 1,330.000 Tunnel Monitoring System J45 2000 150.000 Facilities Engineering Projects FE-J 21.000,000 Replacement and Refurbishment Various Repl.&Refurb.for PI.P2&Joint Facities 379,000,000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Interplant-Joint Works 537.147.000 Special Proiects Strategic and Master Planning Investigate&Repair Ocean Oudall J-39 2000 350.000 Strategic Plan-Phase 3 J40.3 6/11/1999 Exhibit A 11 53 AM Strategic Plan Project Summary Contract Or Year Strategic Project Required Plan Estimated Project Description Number In Service Total Project Strategic Plan Program EIR J40 Information Mgt S Computerization Air Quality Info.Mgt.System 2001 20,000 Automation Report Publishing SP-36 2003 75,000 CMMS Programming SP-04 2002 150,000 Data Integration SP-02 2002 2,445,000 Document Management SP-01 2002 99,000 Geographic Information System SP-15 2002 480,0(10 Internet Application Development 2004 150,000 Intranet Application Development 2004 100.000 Network Backbone Upgrade Cont. 2003 400.000 Network Test Facility 2000 20,000 Source Control Progmmming SP-13 2002 171.000 Strategic Info.Archileclu a($IA) SP-03 2002 284.000 Voice Data Building Rewiring 2002 99,000 Y2K Dale Change 2001 254.000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Blosolids Management In-County Bicsolids Manangement EA/EIR 2004 100.000 Heat Drying Fossibliry Study/EIR 2004 350,000 OCSD Land Ownership Feasibility Study 2004 60,000 Rail Haul Feasibility Study 2004 30,000 Centrifuge Feasibility Study 2002 560.000 Anoxic Gas Flotation 2000 100.000 Cement Kiln Injection 2000 25.000 Process-Related Special Projects Corrosion Assessment Study for Collection Systems 2001 35,000 Headworics Main Sewer Pump Rehab, 2000 150,000 Clarifier Efficiency Improvements 2002 1.600,000 Microfiltration Research 2002 600.000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Miscellaneous Plant Process Equipment Replacement 2018 1,520,000 Security System Improvements 2000 92.000 Non Strategic Plan Projects Subtotal Special Projects 10,319.000 Cooperative Projects Water Management Projects GWR Systemr J-36 2003 120,650.000 Water Conservation N2 Cooperative Projects(181,conservation) J-73 2020 154,000,OW Watershed Management Program Subtotal Cooperative Projects 274,650.000 Equipment,Tools&Fixtures Total for Joint Treatment Works 1.279.694.000 Total Strategic Plan Projects 1,515,366,000 w mm MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 26, 1999 A combined meeting of the Steering and Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, May 26, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Debra Lacuna, Deputy Committee Secretary Peer Swan,Vice Chair of the Board David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OUTS Committee Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Gary Streed, Director of Finance Jim Silva, County Supervisor Greg Mathews, Assistant to General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Hughes Ryal Wheeler (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the of the April 28, 1999 Combined Meeting of the Steering and Ad Hoc Committees were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. 1� Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 May 26, 1999 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. The General Manager announced that nominations for the Chairmanship will be made in June at the regular Board Meeting. Also, the discussion of the Pacific Coast Highway spill has once again been pulled from the Water Board Agenda. The General Manager also referred to a telephone conversation he received from Jim Stahl, Assistant General Manager of Los Angeles County Sanitation District who informed him that Senator Polanco is considering a bill that will not allow counties to adopt ordinances on biosolids until the statewide EIR on biosolids is complete. The EIR is scheduled to be completed in October 2000. However, it is late in the legislative cycle to submit a new bill. The Senator will have to attach it to another bill to ensure It is heard by the legislature this session. B. Legislators' Day Michelle Tuchman presented a tentative Agenda for Legislators' Day and requested the Committee's input. Legislators' Day is scheduled for Friday, June 25, 1999. Tentative guest speakers include Jerry King of the Metropolitan Water District Board who will discuss water issues in California and how they pertain to Orange County. Director Jim Silva will speak about Orange County growth projections and the infrastructure needs to accommodate that growth. Don McIntyre will speak about the Strategic Plan. Blake Anderson will speak about the Santa Ana River Watershed Program and Chino Basin including the dairy situation and the day will conclude with a presentation by Bill Mills on the Groundwater Replenishment System. 7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel advised that there will be a need to add two items to the Closed Session Agenda, needing immediate action, which arose subsequent to the publication of the Agenda,to wit: Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680; and County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D) A. Consider Revisions to Payment of Claims Report(Gary Streed) Gary Streed requested the Committee's consideration on revising the Payment of Claims Report by eliminating the brief description of purchase or service. Although the description is not required, the Board is still required to ratify the claims for which the description might be necessary. It was concluded by staff that almost .25 FTE per year is utilized to prepare such a detailed report. After discussion, the Committee agreed that the current level of detail shown in the report is necessary for ratification. However, it was also suggested that perhaps a middle-ground could be reached in order to save staff time and still offer the Board sufficient information to ratify the report. If so, the new proposed report should be presented to the FAHR Committee. Y Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 May 26, 1999 B. Purchasing Resolution and Delegation of Authority(Don McIntyre) This item recommends that the Delegation of Authority for the General Manager and the Director of Engineering be increased to$100,000 for Professional Services Agreements and change orders. The new resolution would consolidate past resolutions to offer more consistency on the General Manager's delegation of authority. It will also provide additional flexibility to save District time in getting projects approved, lessen the workload submitted to the Board and Committees, and provide more time for the Directors to focus on the "bigger picture"projects. It was also discussed to give purchasing authority at the Division and Department level for which a credit card system would be developed. After discussion, the Committee agreed to send this proposed item to the FAHR Committee for further discussion and eventually to the PDC. C. Update on Employment Law Bills (Mike Petennan) Mike Petennan gave the Committee an update on two important bills currently under consideration by the legislature. AB240 and SB739 will have a significant impact on the negotiating and bargaining process between the District and its employees. Both bills would allow management, confidential, or supervisory employees to enter into agency shop agreements. SB739 goes so far as to allow employees of the District to establish agency shop agreement without negotiating with the District if 30% of the employees sign a petition and this is a majority vote in favor of the agreement. The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) is urging wastewater agencies to submit letters in opposition to both of these bills. After discussion, it was agreed that Human Resources and General Counsel will prepare a letter for the Steering Committee's approval and Chair Debay's signature to show opposition to these two bills. D. Report on Status of State Water Bond Proposals (Don McIntyre) The General Manager provided information regarding California Water Bonds. The Committee discussed whether the District should become more involved in these types of issues in order to earmark funds for the Santa Ana River Watershed Program and/or GWRS that could benefit the District. It was decided to monitor the efforts being made by the Southern California Alliance to see if our active participation may be needed. E. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to Be Presented to Committees in June (Information item only) The General Manager referred to PDC Item#9 and clarified that discussion will be held on the entire 1999-00 Proposed Budget as well as the Capital Improvement Plan. All Committees will review the Proposed Budget in June. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 May 26, 1999 (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Saltarelli suggested that the Tramell/Crow matter be referred back to the FAHR Committee. The General Manager also informed the Committee that a Draft Agreement prepared by General Counsel is now being reviewed by IRWD. Director Swan requested further information on the cooperative projects item shown on the Board Agenda for May regarding Inflow and Infiltration costs. The Committee discussed the matter but did not decide on any actions. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for June 23, 1999 at 5 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION General Counsel reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957 to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item No. 13A(1) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add two items needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the Agenda. He reported that additional Items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. It was moved, seconded, and unanimously carried that pending litigation matters entitled Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts., OCSC Case No. 732680, and County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies, at al., OCSC Case No. 722816 be added to the Agenda for discussion and action as Items Nos. 13A(2) and 13A(3). At 6:15 p.m, the Committee convened in closed session pursuant to Government Y Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 May 26, 1999 Code Sections 54957 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final re Agenda Items Nos. 13A(1), 13A(2), and 13A(3) . At 7:00 p.m., the Committee reconvened In regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. a Prepared by: r Debra Lacuna Deputy Committee Secretary Ibadonldafaflwp.afala9andalSteerinp Commi fee19914pr991042899 SC Minufes.doc MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, May 27, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 27, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Kelli Bum-Lucht, CDM John Collins, Committee Chair Leslie Moulton, ESA Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Kris Lindstrom, K.P. Lindstrom &Associates Peer Swan, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee STAFF PRESENT: Norrn Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee Debra Lacuna, Deputy Committee Secretary Peter Green David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor Directors Absent: Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) AGENDA The agenda was posted in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given by the Committee Chair. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre discussed the near completion of the Strategic Plan. The project began in January 1996 and is approaching the end of its final phase with the adoption of a new Draft Environmental Impact Report that is being reviewed by the Committee. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 May 27, 1999 (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was presented by General Counsel (8) AD HOC COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report An informal presentation was given by Engineering Staff and Project Consultants to discuss the first draft of the Environmental Impact Report which is scheduled to be released to the public on June 24, 1999. Staff is requesting the Committee's direction on what items should go to the Board for further action. 1. Level of Treatment The level of secondary treatment for future operation was discussed. The Strategic Plan recommends that the current level of 50150 be changed to the permit requirements in order to monitor the ocean environment and save operational costs. This option is fully protective of the environment according to the Environmental Impact Report. The Committee gave staff suggestions on the information to be presented to the Board. 2. Use of the 78-inch Outfall The use of the 78-inch outfall for emergency discharge during peak wet weather was discussed as an alternative to constructing a new outfall. 3. Marine Environment and Public Health Impacts The EIR discusses impacts to the marine environment and public health if the Strategic Plan recommendations are implemented. These impacts are not significant and can be mitigated. The Strategic Plan recommendation to change the level of treatment to the amount allowed by our permit and implementing the GWRS program can cause the concentration of oil and grease in the ocean discharge to increase, however, permit limits will be met. An alternative to mitigate this impact would be to monitor and increase the level of treatment. In the event of use of the 78-inch outfall, beach closure would be necessary. However, since the 78-inch outfall would only be used during a winter storm event, it does not really pose a severe threat because these storms are infrequent. The EIR recommends disinfection to decrease the level of bacteria but that is contradictory to the RWOCB. Another mitigation measure is the application of new technology such as microfiltration to increase the quality of effluent being discharged through the 78-inch outfall. 4. Treatment Facilities and Collection System Impacts The final discussion was on how the preferred scenario would impact facilities. The preferred alternative requires the least amount of new facilities. The other posed alternative to treat full secondary with GWRS in place would result in the most new facilities. These new facilities would create impacts by increasing views of site facilities from residential areas. However, by implementing the Strategic Plan urban design element, we can more effectively screen Plant No. 2. Other impacts, such as traffic, noise and increase in hazard materials, can also be mitigated. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 3 May 27, 1999 (9) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications discussed an upcoming media briefing before the EIR "hits the streets"tentatively scheduled for June 29 at the District's Administrative Office. Pertinent District staff will be present at the briefing to assist the media with any questions. It is anticipated that the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register and Daily Pilot will be represented at the briefing. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS A meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee 2 is scheduled for Thursday, June 17, 1999 and a Strategic Plan Workshop is scheduled for Saturday, June 19, 1999. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. (13) ADJOURNMENT The Chair de/dared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Debra Lecuna Deputy Committee Secretary M:YOObYJmwIGYMlI,z00'O.1rIPo.mwub.Os 4 , a • ee DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, June 2, 1999 -5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on June 2, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Charles Egigian-Nichols Pat McGuigan, Chair James Ferryman, Vice Chair Staff Present: Don Bankhead John Collins, Past Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, BoardChair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Peter Green Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Joy Neugebauer Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Anna Piercy Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Peer Swan, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Charles E. Sylvia Gary Streed, Director of Finance Paul Walker Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Mike Moore, ECM Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Gerald Jones, O&M Maintenance Manager Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 June 2, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the May 5, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as corrected. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair McGuigan gave no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the $1.8 million bond issue regarding water issues, including funds for reclamation and watershed management, continues to move through committee and is targeted for the March 2000 ballot. Mr. McIntyre will keep Directors informed as the bill moves along. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported last week he attended an AMSA meeting in Washington, D.C. He also spent two days on Capitol Hill and with EPA discussing policies and funding. More attention is being given to agricultural pollution. Washington, D.C. officials are looking at the Chino Basin. He is hopeful that EPA and the US Department of Agriculture will provide funding support for manure management and Flood control that will limit the pollution occurring to groundwater and surface water in the Santa Ana River watershed. Rebuild America is changing its focus from transportation issues to other infrastructure needs. AMSA is changing the national dialogue on setting funding priorities. Locally, we are involved with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA)that is developing an inventory of Southern California infrastructure needs. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION The Director of General Services Administration, Ed Hodges, reported on an agreement recently approved with Seaside Financial for lease of property at Plant 1. At the May 5" meeting Directors asked staff to be sure that the agreement gave the Disbict unlimited access to this land for geotechnical work in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System project. Mr. Hodges stated that Seaside Financial has agreed to this issue in concept. Mr. Hodges also reported on an agreement recently entered into with Eller Media for lease of a small parcel of land at Plant No. 1 for 45-60 days. They have an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach to remove bus benches and need a temporary place to store the removed benches until shipped elsewhere. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance i and Technical Services Committee Page 3 June 2, 1999 (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology, Patrick Miles, updated the Directors on the Data Warehouse project. (10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance, Bob Dolan, reported suggested that the September committee meeting be held at Plant 2, preceded by a tour of the facilities. (11) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirelli, updated the Directors on alleged crop damage sustained by application of biosolids performed by Pima Gro, a contractor of the District A claim was filed against Pima Gro in the amount of$161,000. Staff is evaluating what responsibility the District may have in the matter. Preliminary results indicate that the problem may have been caused by the way the biosolids were managed. Mr. Ghirelli also reported that the investigation had been completed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on the July 1998 Newport Beach sewer spill. It was determined that the District was at fault and a $50,000 fine would be imposed. (12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (13) ACTION ITEMS (items a-b) a. OMTS99.18: Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley providing for the City to use District's diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1 at cost plus 5% administration fee, for a period of five years with five-year renewal options. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staff's recommendation. b. OMTS99-19: Approve Phase 3 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc.for$250.000 for the period from July 1999 to February 2000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee ) Page 4 June 2, 1999 (14) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-c) a. OMTS99-20: Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch Purchase Update Mike Moore, ECM Manager, updated the Directors on this issue. b. OMTS99-21: Revisions to Local Limits Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, reported on this issue. c. OMTS99-22: Proposed Operation, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 1999-2000 Gary Streed, Director of Finance, briefly reviewed the proposed budget. (15) CLOSED SESSION Chair McGuigan reported to the Committee the need for a dosed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, in order to add one item needing immediate attention that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at at., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816. She reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b), upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to add an item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b), the Committee convened in closed session at 7:16 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the dosed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken regarding this item. At 7:25 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 June 2, 1999 (19) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for July 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Submitted by: ,. Penny M. Ky Operations, t intenance dd Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\wp.dtaWgendaWMTS\IQB InamM0M MinNez.dee OMTS COMMITTEE aketlngeMe ToxtW. 6/07J98 6/73/9a AGENDA REPORT ItemNumt HeMNumbrr OKrS93018 15 W Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUELING AGREEMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley for provision of vehicle fueling services. SUMMARY In November 1998, staff received direction from the Board to enter into a six-month agreement with The City of Fountain Valley for the purpose of allowing them to use our gasoline and diesel fueling facility at Plant 1 until their yard is complete. Under the terms of the fueling agreement, the City pays the District for the cost of the fuel plus a 5% administrative fee. During the term of the agreement,the City has had access to our facility and fuel island on a 24- hour per day basis. Staff issued City staff card keys that will allow the City police staff to have access to our ptant during off shift times. Staff also issued a Personal Identification Number (PIN) that the City staff use to access the fuel pumps. The PIN allows us to capture the actual amount of fuel used in each of the City vehicles and allows us to prepare our billing report to the City. Diesel and unleaded gasoline usage is paid for out of the District's Joint Operating budget under a blanket purchase order. Fuel is ordered when the tanks are low. To date the program has been a great success. So much so, that the City has requested that we enter into a longer-term agreement with renewable options. This will allow them to not build a separate fueling facility at their new maintenance yard. Staff recommends that the Board direct the General Manager to enter into a 5-year agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. The terms of the agreement will be that the City pays us for the cost of the fuel used, plus a 5%administrative fee under the terms of the agreement, renewals be allowed at 5-year increments that are mutually acceptable to both parties. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project will pay for itself and as a result is revenue/expense neutral. H%cud 98nda�M Agelm aaw�ig awm Agenda Repoaanewnem INC) : Page BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section, page) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Since Staff budgeted $140,000 under the Miscellaneous Chemicals, Gasoline, Diesel and Oil portion in this years fiscal JO budget. Since the City of Fountain Valley will reimburse the District for the use of any gasoline and diesel fuel, the expenditure of these funds should have a minimal effect on the budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff is working with General Counsel to prepare an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to proceed with the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A EEH: fw Hr y ae�p.wmm Mom•R.00,nnew eo.m nww R�neeem,,,15(cl Page 2 ` OMTS COMMITTEE Meetlng Doh To B0.of Dir. 6/2/99 6/23t AGENDA REPORT ;nnis9i/9 is��P" Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General M nager SUBJECT: YEAR 2000 DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Phase 3 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc. for$218,500 for the period from July 1999 to February 2000. SUMMARY The Year 2000 (Y2K) Date Change Project is required to ensure that the District's internal process controls, embedded systems, and computing systems operate safely, predictably, and satisfactorily for all dates in the Year 2000 and beyond. Industry standard methodology will be used to successfully achieve the following objectives in priority order: 1. PUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS • Ensure personnel safety systems are functional and meet OSHA requirements. • Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants and through the 120" ouffall. 2. TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS • Achieve full compliance with discharge quality requirements 3. ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE • Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions of permits issued by RWQCB, EPA, and SCAQMD. 4. MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES • Ensure compliance for non-process related systems including the Financial Information System (FIS), desktop computing systems, security systems, etc. District staff, in conjunction with Bristol Systems Inc., have participated in Y2K preparations since June 1998. As January 1, 2000 approaches, on-going Y2K identification and mitigation efforts are progressing. The District efforts thus far have garnered national attention as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has recognized the District's Y2K preparation program as "Best in Class." Consequently, a published article outlining our Y2K program will be forthcoming in the near future. Phase 3 of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Bristol Systems Inc. is now required. Phase 2, approved by the Committee and Board in October 1998, ends on q,„W ,a„M Page 1 June 30, 1999. Phase 3 represents the final project management phase for the Y2K Date Change Project. The ongoing contractual services provided by Bristol Systems Inc. have assisted the District in completing a significant number of Y21K-related objectives and goals. The Information Technology Director has periodically reported upon these Y2K accomplishments at Committee meetings. Additionally, Y21K project information has been forwarded in prior agenda reports. The following is representative of major project successes that have been achieved as a result of the District's Y21K program: • The Central Generation Power Plants (CenGen) at both plants are the primary source of electrical power to the District's in-plant pumping systems and treatment processes. The control systems of CenGen, which essentially monitor and run the engines, had both Y21K non-compliant operating systems and application code proprietary to the control system manufacturer. Failure of CenGen could potentially lead to plant-wide electrical failures. These systems have been upgraded and are undergoing field testing to ensure Y2K compliance. These mitigation efforts fall within Objective#1 cited above. • Automated plant-wide systems, including CRISP monitoring capability and some Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), were Y2K non-compliant. Failure of CRISP would have resulted in a shutdown of plant process monitoring capability thereby rendering the plants "invisible"to Operations staff. Additionally, PLC failure would eliminate the capability to a) control plant processes through automation thus requiring staff to run the plants in Manual mode, and b) monitor remote pump station operations thereby rendering them "invisible"to plant Operations staff. These systems are being upgraded. These mitigation efforts fall within Objective #1 and #2 cited above. • Our security system controlling entry to various buildings were found to be Y21K non- compliant. Failure of these systems would have resulted in all "keycard"doors remaining in the locked position. Ingress would therefore become difficult, if not impossible, in the short-term until systems override was accomplished. Security would be compromised in the longer term as all essential "keycard" doors would remain unlocked until the security system could be upgraded. This system has been upgraded and is now compliant. These mitigation efforts fall within Objective#1 cited above for both personnel safety reasons as well as a possible inability to access critical systems in a timely manner. • An evaluation of laboratory systems for Year 2000 compliance determined that several types of software and analytical instruments would not be functional in the new millennium. Failure of these systems would prohibit us from effectively completing analyses and testing required by our permits. These systems are undergoing upgrade and replacement. These mitigation efforts fall within Objective #2 and #3 cited above. • Various District-wide networked computers and servers were Y21K non-compliant. Failure of such systems would have resulted in business-process shutdowns. These R"n."E M. Page 2 systems have undergone upgrade. These mitigation efforts fall within Objective #3 and #4 cited above. Phase 3 work will encompass and continue the scope of Project Management services previously approved by the Board and outlined in prior reports (and summarized in the Additional Information section). Furthermore, additional efforts will be focused on the following major elements: • Provide specific project management oversight for the Operations & Maintenance Department's software remediation efforts. • Provide specific project management oversight for CenGen Y21K remediation. • Complete District-wide Y2K risk assessment and its impact upon the depth, breadth and scope of the District's Y21K contingency plans. The plans are in development in case of Y2K-related system failures. Bristol Systems Inc. has been under contract since June 1998. The Phase 3 contract is critical to successful completion of the Y21K Date Change Project. Dr. Winters, President of the firm and Principal of this project, chairs the IEEE Working Group for Year 2000 Problems in Embedded Devices and co-chairs the Southern Califomia Software Council's Special Interest Group on the Year 2000. Dr. Winters has 33 years of experience in the computer industry specializing in embedded systems. His firm's expertise is crucial and his continued involvement will greatly enhance District staffs ability to successfully achieve Y2K goals and objectives. The contract is extended until February 2000 to provide assistance in the due-diligence processing of Y21K-related records, conduct project closure activities, and participate in any mitigation related to a Y21K system failure. Note that based on the total contract value, services in calendar 2000 represent 8% of the contract budget. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Bristol Systems Inc., over the life of the Y2K project, has been previously contracted for $550,000 worth of services. This PSA request will increase the amount to $768,500. This represents approximately 22% of the $3.51 million budgeted in FY 98/99 and FY 99100 for District-wide Y2K assessment and remediation efforts. The following table summarizes the professional hours planned by Bristol Systems Inc. for the Phase 3 contract: Staff Mem`6e '`8 _`Phase.3�Coritracf Ffoii►s.R n € W- $Z p . G. Winters 558 $83,700 F. LaRue 624 $74,880 K. VanDalsum 1,200 $60,000 TOTAL: 2,382 $218,580 Bristol Systems Inc.Staff Hours Dedicated to Phase 3 Y2K Project Page 3 See attached project spreadsheet for overall impact of Bristol Systems Inc. contract services on Y21K budget. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 99100 Y2K CORF budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The Y21K Date Change Compliance Project is a CORF-funded project. Board approved funding in FY 98199 of$2,141,500 will not be exceeded. Pending Board approval (awaiting FY 99/00 Budget review) of$1,365,000 for FY 99/00 Y2K budget is anticipated. If this budget is approved, the Phase 3 contract will represent 16% of the FY 99100 Y2K budgeted funds. The balance will go to District staff project involvement, upgrades, and other necessary contract services. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Scope to Date: The scope of the Bristol System Inc. project management contracts have been: • Assist staff to understand the need for, and subsequently help develop an embedded systems inventory. • Assist staff in adopting a standardized methodology, producing a written project plan, maintaining a uniform documentation system, and developing detailed project schedules for tracking. • Assist the District in focusing the Y2K project on its key goals. • Increase District-wide awareness of the Y2K problem. • Implement a standardized Y21K project methodology and written project plan. Update the written project plan monthly. • Create and maintain the Y2K project task tracking system. • Assist District staff in the creation and maintenance of a detailed and unified project schedule. • Create and maintain a project archive to satisfy due diligence concerns. • Work with District staff to produce an embedded system assessment and detailed embedded systems inventory. • Coordinate the risk assessment study activities with EQE International and District staff. • Manage the external requests for Y2K related information by producing an approved standard response letter. • Assist District staff in identifying critical vendors, mailing request for information letters to each vendor, and track and document the responses. • Assist District staff in developing a treatment process risk analysis study. • Assist District staff in selecting and managing embedded system assessment, reparation, and testing consultants. • Assist District staff in producing, executing, and analyzing compliance testing procedures and testing for computer systems and embedded systems. Rovi. ,nose Page 4 ` • Manage the external requests for Y2K related information b g q y producing an updated approved standard response letter quarterly. • Assist District staffs in tracking critical vendor requests for information, and document all correspondence. • Assist District staff in contingency planning activities. These activities will continue in Phase 3 in addition to the further efforts described in the Summary section. Additional Progress To Date: Y2K program progress has been described in prior Y21K Agenda Reports. The following represents additional important accomplishments that involved both Bristol Systems Inc. and District staff: • An assessment for all of the approximately 1000 different items for which the District and Bristol Systems Inc. could find technical documentation is complete. [Some items had no documentation, the manufacturer no longer existed, model numbers could not be found and manufacturers couldn't identify (mostly older) equipment, etc.] • Bristol Systems Inc. recommended repair orders for approximately 130 items in the field. These are firmware and software upgrades available from the manufacturer. • Bristol Systems Inc. recommended that several hundred items NOT to be tested, but rather to be watched as part of a contingency plan. Such items are susceptible to Year 2000 failure but have both a low likelihood of failure and a low impact if failure should happen. These items are considered acceptable risk, and eliminating them from further testing avoids additional Y2K-related expenses. • Bristol Systems Inc. recommended the testing of certain Variable Frequency Drive pump motors that have embedded date functionality. • Testing and further assessment of non-networked Programmable Logic Controllers that are attached to key systems has been recommended by Bristol Systems Inc. and is scheduled for future efforts. • Bristol Systems Inc. has completed several system analyses of complex systems - OOBS, Plant 1 Headworks, Main Street, and Slater. Their recommendations for the improvement of these systems go beyond Y21K recommendations. • Bristol Systems assisted the District in the development of a "Vigilance" process to ensure that newly purchased items introduced into the District are Y2K compliant. Requirement for additional resources: Bristol Systems Inc. has been instrumental in assisting the District in focusing the Y2K project since June 1998. Bristol Systems assisted staff in adopting a standardized methodology, producing a written project plan, maintaining a uniform documentation system, and developing detailed project schedules for tracking. Bristol Systems has also been instrumental in assisting staff to understand the need for, and subsequently help develop an embedded systems inventory. Their assistance in Phase 3 is critical as we complete the final phase of our Y2K program efforts. ••n. ,ww Page 5 Recommendation for Bristol Systems Consulting Services: Bristol Systems Inc. is the product of a merger between SMS Agoura Systems Incorporated and System Solutions International. These companies have been doing business in Orange County for 24 years collectively. Bristol Systems Inc. maintains offices in Orange and Santa Ana. Their gross revenue last year was approximately $2 million. Current major accounts include Moulton Laguna Nigel Water District, IBM, Dyncorp Inc., and Experian Corporation. Dr. Gayn Winters is the assigned technical representative from Bristol Systems. Dr. Winters has 33 years of experience in the computer industry in computer design, software development and embedded systems and is the Principal involved in this project. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recognizing that some level of effort must be expended on the Y2K project, the Board could direct staff to further limit the time spent on individual projects or reduce efforts on specific objectives listed previously. Consequently, the Bristol System, Inc. Phase 3 contract could be reduced. 2. Direct staff to discontinue Bristol Systems Inc. project management services at the conclusion of June 30, 1999 (end of Phase 2). This would result in elimination of specialized project management services in the six months prior to January 1, 2000. This alternative carries additional risks and would necessitate a dedication of significant additional in-house staff resources. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Year 2000 Date Change Project— Cost Summary A.'.. ,vim Page 6 Year 2000 Date Change Project TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION STAFF OUTSIDE MATIL TOTALS 1 PUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS I $ 351,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 431,000 Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants and through the 12V outfall 2 TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS 468,000 195,000 20,000 683,000 Achieve full compliance with discharge quality requirements 3 ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE 234,000 54,000 288.000 Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions of permits issued by RWDCO, EPA, and SCAOMD 4 MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES 643,500 66,000 30,000 739,500 ..........► @R/STOL SYSTEMSACTUALS- (6139199) 550,000 Other Consulting Services 156,447 Total ACTUALS - (6/30199) $ 1,012,022 $ 706,447 $ 35,808 $ F 1,754,277 PHASE 3 - FY 1999/2000 7 ► Proposed BR/STOL SYSTEMS Services PHASE 3 TOTAL BUDGET $ rr $ 518,700 $ 34,600 719,2 rrTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $1,803,722 $ 1,225,147 $ 90,408 $ 73,177 5125/99 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, June 3, 1999, at 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, June 3, 1999, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Past Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Maintenance Russell Patterson Gary Streed, Director of Finance' Christina Shea Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Lynn Daucher OTHERS PRESENT: Jack Mauller Mary Lee (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the May 6, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 June 3, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the $1.8 million bond issue regarding water issues, including funds for reclamation and watershed management continues to move through committee and is targeted for the March 2000 ballot. Mr. McIntyre will keep Directors informed as the bill moves along. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported last week he attended an AMSA meeting in Washington, D.C. He also spent two days on Capitol Hill and with EPA discussing policies and funding. More attention is being given to agricultural pollution. Washington, D.C. officials are looking at the Chino Basin. He is hopeful that EPA and the US Department of Agriculture will provide funding support for manure management and flood control that will limit the pollution occurring-to groundwater and surface water in the Santa Ana River watershed. Rebuild America is changing its focus from transportation issues to other infrastructure needs. AMSA is changing the national dialogue on setting funding priorities. Locally, we are involved with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA)that is developing an inventory of Southern California infrastructure needs. Mr. Anderson also reported that the investigation had been completed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on the July 1998 Newport Beach sewer spill. It was determined that the District was at fault and a $50,000 fine would be imposed. The District would be required to submit a cash payment of$10,000 to the slate fund, and the balance would be targeted for an environmental improvement. Discussions were underway to capture storm drain runoff flows during the summer months from the Newport Beach backbay. A small pump would be placed into a nearby sewer and would only operate during specific summer months. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering did not make a report. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. P PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 June 3, 1999 (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. a-g) a. PDC99-28: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$326,366 and 328 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $14,027,424; (2) Approve a budget amendment of$1,112,258 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of$21,118,358; (3) Accept Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. Director Ron Patterson abstained. b. PDC99-29: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, with Mike Prtich & Sons authorizing an addition of$115,000 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,392,796. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly caned to recommend approval. c. PDC99-30 Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, providing for additional construction support services in the amount of$37,502, for a total amount not to exceed $375,056. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. d. PDC99-31: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Converse Consultants, Law/Crandall, and Ninyo &Moore, providing for geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment and materials testing services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-182, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one- year extension ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. V PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 June 3, 1999 e. PDC99-32: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with DGA Consultants, Inc., Bush &Associates, Inc., and Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc., providing for surveying services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P- 183, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extension ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. f. POC99-33: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers; Krieger& Stewart, Inc.; Lee & Ro, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc.; and Tran Consulting Engineers, for professional engineering services related to (small projects) for Facilities Engineering Consulting Services for an amount not to exceed $160,000 each, for a total of$800,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. Director Steve Anderson abstained. g. PDC99-34: Proposed FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement Program Budget— Information only item. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reviewed the budget with the Committee. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 June 3, 1999 (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 1, 1999. at 5:00 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Submitted by: X &,4 // . Penny I t le PDC Comi ittee Sec H:Mp.dta�a9em @%PDC poc99W9MINSL90399mhutes.dw PDC COMMITTEE Meetingo To ad.of Din 6/3/% 6/23/99 AGENDA REPORT oem Numbe MT.N Orange County Sanitation Zkrector FROM: David Lu of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-35-3; PROCESS AREA FIRE PROTECTION, SIGNAGE AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-5; PROCESS AREA FIRE PROTECTION, SIGNAGE AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. 132-46; AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-55 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc., authorizing an additional $326,366 and 328 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $14,027,424; (2) Approve a budget amendment of$1,112,258 to authorize additional funds for a total project budget of$21,118,358: (3)Accept Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 8 includes 12 items of add/deduct work to Job No. P2-35-3, at al. There are five items which include omissions in this change order. There is a 328- calendar day time extension associated with this change order. A net budget increase of$1,112,258 is requested to bring the total project budget to $21,118,358. The funds requested are for the construction contract, additional staff labor and overhead. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The project was completed on January 21, 1999. Contract Start Date April 8, 1996 Original Contract Completion Date October 9, 1997 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 8 Current Contract Completion Date January 21, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 c�mam2+c•a+omxw�.woonssaurr•oe..ecwax R. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY •a Original Contract Price $13.196,500 Previously Authorized Changes $ 504,558 This Change (Add) $ 326,366 Change Orders to Date $ 830,924 Percentage Increase to Date $ 6.30% Amended Contract Price $14,027,424 Note: Change Order No. 1, in the amount of$250,000 included construction of hazardous waste storage lockers which was added work not related to this project. The total change order percentage would have been 4.40%without Change Order No. 1. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line Item: A.6.a, B.6.a, B.61, and B.B.b.) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Cost for Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table have overrun the current budget. The additional funds requested for this project provide for additional staff time to complete the extended project and the associated staff time overhead allocations. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P2-35-3 is construction of a 30,000 square foot maintenance facility to provide a full service maintenance function at Plant 2. The plans and specifications for this job were prepared by Brown and Caldwell. Job No. 132-55 is the replacement of the chlorine odor control and disinfection system facilities with hydrogen peroxide and bleach. Also included are improvements to the plant water system to route secondary effluent to the plant water pump station. The plans and specifications for this job were prepared by Black and Veatch. Job No. P1-38-5 is the installation of a new fire protection system at Plant No. 1 and includes signing of buildings to aid in identification during emergencies. This project will provide for three water systems; potable water system, reclaimed water system, and secondary plant water system. Plans and specifications for this job were prepared by Lee and Ro. cm,eoe.vy. a.w.n a.wn•eowx.as. .rt coe.mmn as Page 2 Job No. P2-06 is the building of a new potable water pump station that will replace the existing fire protection system that uses secondary water with a new higher capacity system that uses potable water. Building signage is also included for identification during emergencies. Plans and specifications for this job were prepared by Lee and Ro. A combined construction contract for the above jobs was awarded to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. and construction began on April 8, 1996. The contract is now 100% complete. The following table summarizes Change Order No. 8. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Paint Additional Pipes in Tunnels at $27,370 0 Other Plants 1 and 2 2 Modifications to Plants 1 and 2 City $12,844 0 Design Change Water Pump Station and Water and Omission Distribution System Sub Item D 3 Modifications to Maintenance Building $55,359 0 Design Change, Changed Conditions and Omissions (Sub Items D, E, FA H. I K. L, and P 4 Modifications to Plant 2 City Water $19,336 0 Changed Pump Station Conditions and Omission (Sub Item C 5 Connection to City Water Main in $63,902 171 Other Brookhurst Street 6 Modifications at Chemical Facilities $37,660 0 Design Change, Changed Conditions and Omissions (Sub Items A, E, and F 7 Chlorination and Pipe Modifications at $22,338 68 Changed Plant 1 City Water Pump Station Conditions 8 Modifications to Plant 1 City Water $122,137 0 Design Change, Pump Station and Water Distribution Changed System Conditions and Omissions (Sub Item E 9 Credits $18,080 0 Other 10 Time Extension for Inclement Weather $0 37 Other 11 Resolution to Disputed Items $0 52 Other 12 Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities $16 500 0 1 Other TOTAL—Change Order No. 8 1 $326,366 1328 G NfpNCeM9mL doll FKu'kW DLIG3JSJAR COYMCO�.JN Page 3 Item 5, includes a 171-day time extension to the contract. During this period of time, there were numerous other delays, which ran concurrent to this delay and were caused by other change order work issued by the District. The delay associated with this item D affected the status of the new City Water Pump Station at Plant No. 2. This delay occurred during the beginning portion of the project. Item 7 includes a 68-day time extension to the contract, which involved a delay to the start up of Plant No. 1 City Water Pump Station. This delay occurred at the end of the project. Item 11 includes a 52-day time extension to the contract that is a negotiated settlement in lieu of the Contractor's request for extended overhead costs and disputed work items. Note: Details regarding each item including omissions, design changes, and changed conditions are in the attached change order document. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Job No. 132-55 is exempt per Notice of Exemption filed on April 30, 1993. Job No. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, and P2-46 are not exempt. Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989 and Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order UM:lc G.^ObNNgMpa�RmwhWIX.lV335lAR C09irkCOAM Rents- aaaRe Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, et al JOB NO. P2-35-3, P2-46, P2-55, and P1-38-5 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Proect Develo ment $ 8 Desi n Staff $ $ Consultant PSA $ 1286169 $ 1288169 $ 1286169 $ 1286169 $ 1286169 $ 1286100 100% Construction Contract $ 14,934,122 $ 14.934.122 $ 14 934 122 $ 13701,058 $ 326 366 $ 14 027 424 $ 12,503,511 89% Construction Other $ 1373632 $ 1373632 $ 1373632 $ 1373632 $ 1373632 $ 1373632 100% Staff $ 2,412,177 $ 2.412177 $ 1 112258 $ 3 524 435 $ 2 412 177 $ 1,112258 $ 3.524A35 $ 3 524 435 100% Contingency $ E TOTAL $ 20,006,100 $ 20,006,100 $ 1,112,258 $ 21,118,358 $ 18,773,036 1 $ 1,438,6241 $ 20,211,660 $ 18,687.678 92% M1:b .dbNng4obvnd conbac V2-3SPG0e Budget table CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, ET AL Job No. P2-35-3, et al ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 2128196 $ 13,196,500.00 $ 13,196,500.00 550 550 CO NO. 1 1/22197 $ 250,000.00 $ 13,446,500.00 1.89% 12 562 CO NO. 2• 3/21/97 $ 23,916.00 $ 13,470,416.00 2.08% 0 562 CO NO. 3' 8119/97 $ 17,405.00 $ 13,487,821.00 2.21% 0 562 CO NO. 4 11/19/97 $ 80,611.00 $ 13,568,432.00 2.82% 27 589 CO NO. 5' 8/20/98 $ 31,424.00 $ 13,599,856.00 3.06% 43 632 CO NO, 6 12/26/98 $ 101,202.00 $ 13,701,058.00 3.82% 59 691 CO NO. 7' 4/5/99 0.00 $ 13,701,058.00 3.82% 0 691 CO NO. 8 Pending $ 326.366.00 $ 14,027,424.00 6.309/6 328 1019 *Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 Hiwpdt~gNaMand=tmctsP2-35-3%C08 Status Report 6 ' v Page 1 of 15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eiaht(8) Date: June 23. 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35.3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $326,366.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. P1-385 and P2-46 ITEM 1 —PAINT ADDITIONAL PIPES IN TUNNELS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for painting additional length of pipes in the Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 Tunnels. The contract documents required that the Contractor paint 43,000-linear feet of pipe in the Plant 1 and Plant 2 Tunnels. Actual field measurements revealed that the pipe lengths to be painted exceeded 43,000 linear feet. The additional cost is due to the adjustments of engineer's quantities from 43,000 linear feet to 46,910 feet. Reference: Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 228. (P1-38-5=50% and P246=50%). This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 1-=6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $27,370.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—MODIFICATIONS TO PLANTS 1 AND 2 CITY WATER PUMP STATION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for the following modifications to Plant Nos. 1 and 2 City Water Pump Station (CWPS) and Water Distribution System: A. Create Control Station Summary Screens—Additional computer programming was requested by District staff to create summary screens for better control of the CWPS at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The new screen will aid in better operation of the pumps and will be consistent with the other District systems. Reference Field Change Order 60 and Sverdrup's Serial Letter 237. Cost of this change is $1,714. B. Install Flange Isolation Kits and Test Water Distribution System —The contract documents required that the existing and new water distribution system be tested to ensure adequate cathodic protection after installing new pipes and fittings. Tests revealed that three flange isolation kits (two 12-inch and one 4-inch) were required to ensure longevity of the new water distribution system which is connected to the existing water system. Isolation kits were installed at the following locations; 4-inch at basement of the Central Generation Building, 12-inch at north side of COBS, and 12-inch at the east side of the CWPS. Reference Field Change Orders 47 and 48 and Page 2 of 15 p ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight(8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 234. Cost of this change is $6,316. C. Flow Switches to CWPS Pumps—During the functional testing of the CWPS it was discovered that the Sow switches provided better operational control of the 125 HP pumps than the specified pressure switches. The District chose to replace the pressure switches with flow switches for improved operation and control of the pump station. The Contractor was directed to install four pressure switches; two at Plant No. 1 CWPS and two at Plant No. 2 CWPS. Reference Field Change Order No. 56. Cost of this change is $4,545. D. Power Meter Programming Modifications-The work for this item included start-up services for two 3710�power monitors at CWPS Plant No. 2 and one 3710 power monitor at Central Generation 12 KV Toshiba Cubicle 26-T for Distribution Center"D"feeding the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. This work was necessary to include the new 3710 power monitors into the M-SCADA system and was not included in the original contract documents. Reference Plan Change 30 and Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 239. Cost of this change is $269.00. Portions of this work were accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions and some items negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) the General Provisions. (P7-38-5=50% and P2-46=50%). COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,844.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days P2-35-3 ITEM 3— MODIFICATIONS TO MAINTENANCE BUILDING This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for the following modifications to the Maintenance Building: A. Steel at Stair No. 1 Landing— During the shop drawing review of steel drawings prior to installation it was discovered that a thicker steel angle on the structural system at the stair landing was desired for aesthetics and reduced maintenance purposes to provide continuity of the structural system at the stair landing. This item provides for the cost to use tubular steel in lieu of the specified a "L" angle steel beam. Reference Sverdrup' Serial Letter No. 119 and 232, District's letter dated August 25, 1998. Cost of this change is$3,842. B. Increase Overhead Pipe Diameter and Install Alarm Valve for Fire Sprinkler System—These modifications were made based on the field inspection comments from the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. The Fire Department inspection staff required an additional 10% water flow for flow tests and an alarm check valve with a motor gong for the riser. The work included installation of a larger diameter overhead pipe and an alarm valve and water motor gong. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 121 and 232 and District's Letter Dated August 25, 1998. Page 3 of 15 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 Job No. 132-35-37 Process Area Fire Protection Sage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-48: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Cost of this change is $1,320.00. C. Galvanize Metal Doorframes—This work includes galvanizing ten sets of steel plates at roll-up doors. The roll-up doorframes were ferrous metal and uncoated. The District Staff requested galvanizing to prevent corrosion of the steel frames at the Plant 2 site. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 123 and 232 and District's Letter Dated August 25, 1998. Cost of this change is $3,733. D. Added Angle Braces and Connections at Stair No. 3—During the shop drawing review of the steel angles at Stair No. 3 it was discovered that additional steel braces and connections were required to support the live, dead, and seismic loads acting on this system. Per the design consultant's recommendation, angle braces and support connections were added to Stair No. 3. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 125 and 232, RFI No. P2-35-3 122A, and District's Letter dated August 25, 1998. Cost of this change is $1,259.00. E. Extend 2-inch Vents. Ducts and Trap Primers—This work includes installation of additional length of pipe to extend 2-inch vents, trap primers and ducts to the nearest wall for access to the roof. The piping had to be rerouted to the nearest wall to provide adequate supports. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 128, 129 and 130, RFI No. P2-35-3-175, and District's Letter Dated September 2, 1998. Cost of this change is $3,936. F. Weld Too of 6-inch x 6-inch Tubular Steel—The installed 6-inch x 6-inch tubular steel connection to the Lintel Panels 43, 44, and 45 protruded above the finish elevation of the second floor. Therefore the tubular steel had to be cut and welded to conceal the panel connectors with the concrete topping of the second floor. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter 131, RFI No. P2-35-3-183A, and District's Letter Dated September 2, 1998. Cost of this change is$776. G. Increase Floor Slab Thickness -This work was necessary to provide a level floor finish at the second floor of the Maintenance Building. The thickness of the floor slab was increased at certain areas to provide a level surface. The areas affected, had a sloped bottom support system. District Staff requested this area to have a level surface. It was determined that the most cost effective solution was to provide concrete in lieu of modifying the bottom support system. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 133, RFI No. P2-35-3-188, and District's Letter Dated September 2, 1998. Cost of this change is$1,309. H. Metal Deck Support at Stair No. 2— Details of structural supports at the second floor landing were not shown on the contract drawings. Pursuant to the design consultant's recommendation structural supports were added at this location. The work included adding a steel frame to support the stair landing. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 135, RFI No. P2-35-3.184, and District's Letter Dated September 2, 1998. Cost of this change is $2,828. I. Additional Bracing at Concrete Panels 25 and 26—Additional bracing was necessary for Panels 25 and 26 because of their unique shape and configuration and to provide extra stability to the panels. The work included adding two steel angles and connections. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 138, RFI No. P2-35-3-180, and District's letter dated September 2, 1998. Cost of this change is $1,095. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 4 of 15 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-353: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signatte and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-48; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 J. Modifications Required by City of Huntington Beach —The following modifications were required by the City of Huntington Beach to issue an Occupancy Permit for the Maintenance Building. The original building permit did not require these items which are considered as retroactive permit requirements: • One additional urinal was lowered to a height of 17-inches from the Floor level for handicap access. • 18-inch x 18-inch vents in access doors were installed in all storage rooms. • A tempering valve was installed at the water heaters to ensure that the water temperature did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. • The power outlet inside the welders' room was sealed. • The range hood in the kitchen was revised. • Exposed plumbing on the second floor hallway was boxed and finished to match surrounding areas. • The dryer duct at the roof was capped. • The access to the air-conditioning and heating unit on the roof was increased to 30 inches. These items involve changes to local codes that occurred after this project was designed. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 233 and Field Change Order No. 43. Cost of this change is $7,331.00. K. Resize Water Heater and Add Gravity Ventilator—Two domestic hot water heaters were resized from the specified 720,000-Btuh input to 199,900-btuh input. The heaters were resized because District's Staff decided not to operate the laundry facility. A gravity ventilator was installed above the janitor room by cutting a hole in the roof slab. The addition of the ventilator was necessary to allow for proper ventilation in the hot water heater room. This item includes a credit amount for installing lower rated water heaters in lieu of the specified heaters. Reference Plan Change No. 27 and Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 239. Cost of this change is $7,053. L. Hi Pot Testino of Medium Voltage Conductors—The work included testing the existing cables between Distribution Center"D", SCE and the Operations Building. The contract documents did not include testing of existing cables. Also the conduits located at the new signal vault adjacent to the Operations Building were sealed. This work was required to prevent flooding of the basement during heavy rains. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order Nos. 33 and 34. Cost of this change is 5,214. M. Remove and Replace Unsuitable Soil —The unsuitable soil at electrical vault MH 12-10 was removed and replaced with crushed rock. The unsuitable soil was discovered after excavation and hence was an unforeseen condition. Reference Sverdmp's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order No. 3. Cost of this change is $5,541. N. Install Roof Receptacles—Three GFIC 20 amp 125 volts receptacles were installed on the Maintenance Building roof. The receptacles were not shown on the contract drawings and were requested by District Staff to perform maintenance on the equipment (exhaust fans and HVAC system). Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order No. 18, Cost of this change is 2,042. ° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 5 of 15 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 o. Install Service Hardware in Existing Operations Building Switchboard C (OBC) Panel—Service hardware was installed in the existing OBC panel at the Plant 2 Operations Center to feed the interplant facility. Service hardware was installed because hardware for the specified breaker did not exist in the OBC. District As-Builts were incorrect. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order No. 24. Cost of this change is $715. P. Change Elevation of Light Fixtures and Remove and Replace Wire at MBC to MBB—The elevations of ten light fixtures at the electric shop, storage room, telephone room, UPS room and storage room were changed. The drawings indicated that the light fixtures were to be surface mounted on the ceiling. However, to bypass the mechanical equipment and ducting, the elevations of the light fixture locations were changed. The existing wires feeding the MBC to MBB were replaced with 4-310 and #3 wiring to comply with the latest National Electric Code. This added work was not shown on the contract drawings, Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter 231 and Field Change Orders 28 and 31. Cost of this change is $7,902. O. Access Door for Elevator Shaft—A new door was installed to access the elevator shaft. This door was not shown on the contract drawings and was necessary to comply with the new elevator code that requires that the fire alarm sensors be serviced outside the hoistway. These changes were necessary due to the new elevator code requirements and were not available during the design phase. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order No. 26. Cost of this change is $370. R. Interior Modifications—This change is for implementing interior modifications to the Maintenance Building by providing new doors and walls, adding HVAC, communication systems and suspended ceiling in areas previously labeled as storage. District's Maintenance Staff requested this change to provide a more functional work area. This change was initiated because District's staffing and office utilization plans had changed since the design of the Maintenance Building. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No.147, 233, and 239, Field Change Order 41, and Plan Change 22A. Cost of this change is $4,779. S. Delete Laundry Chute and Hampers—This is a credit item for deleting work in the laundry room including laundry chute, hampers and roof penetrations. The work was deleted because District Staff decided to continue to have laundry services contracted by an outside service. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 117 and Plan Change No. 33. Credit for this change is ($5,686.00) Some portions of this work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions and some portions were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $55,359.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 15 a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight(8) Date: June 23 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 P2-46 ITEM 4- MODIFICATIONS TO PLANT 2 CITY WATER PUMP STATION This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for the following modifications at Plant 2 City Water Pump Station: A. Asbestos Abatement -This item is for additional work required to remove and dispose asbestos containing materials found in the walls of the old CWPS and was an unforeseen condition. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 230. Cost of this change is $1,242, B. Repair Leaks to Water Main—This item is to repair existing piping leaks at the water main near Plant 2 CWPS. The leaks were detected during the start up of the CWPS. The pipe was on the discharge side of the pumps and was required to be fixed to allow for the start up the new CWPS and the water distribution system. Reference Sverdrup's Letter No. 240. Cost of this change is $2,934. C. Additional Pipe Supports—This item is for work involved to provide additional pipe supports at the new CWPS. The additional pipe supports were not shown on the drawings and were required to provide adequate structural support to the pipes ranging from 6 inches to 12 inches. Reference Sverdrup's Letter No. 240 and Field Change Order No. 45. Cost of this change is $9,999. D. PLC GFI Breaker-This item was to remove existing GFI single pole breaker feeding modicon CPU in the PLC and replace it with a non-GFI breaker. The existing breaker was tripping and a different breaker was necessary to prevent shut downs at the CWPS. The existing power supply did not have surge suppression and was affecting the air break tank level transmitters. Additional noise filter power supplies were required to be installed in the existing local control panel. Reference Sverdup's Letter Dated 221 and 224 and Field Change Order No. 55. Cost of this change is $5,161. Some portions of this work were accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section to- 6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions and some portions were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $19,336.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 7 of 15 ° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: June 23. 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 ITEM 5—CONNECTION TO CITY WATER MAIN IN BROOKHURST STREET This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for revisions to connect to the City Water Main in Brookhurst Street. During the design process of this job District Staff obtained verbal approval from the City of Huntington Beach for this tie-in. After award of the construction contract, the District re-applied for a Coastal Permit. During the process to obtain the Coastal Permit, the City included several revisions to the original plans. Some of these revisions are attributed to changes in City personnel and the City's use of consultants in the City's plan approval process. The revisions to the City Water Main connection included the following: • Additional 16-inch valves and transition Flanges. • Furnishing and installing a Steel Casing and PVC pipe instead of ductile iron pipe. • Additional Hydrotests. • Extensive work involved with isolating the City Main instead of the specified hot tap connection. • Additional excavation and asphalt replacement. Isolating the City main resulted in constructing a temporary by pass line to maintain water service to the Plant. The implementation and coordination of these changes with the District and City's staff resulted in time delays to the project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Sverdrup's Letter Dated 236 and Plan Change 17A. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $63,902.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 171 Calendar Days P2-55 ITEM 6—MODIFICATIONS AT CHEMICAL FACILITIES This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for the following modifications at the Chemical Facilities: A. Safety Shower Pipe and Flow Control Panel Relocation —The work included relocating the flow control panel at the North Scrubber and the water pipe feeding the safety shower at the South Scrubber. The existing Flow control panel and safety shower pipes interfered with the alignment of the new piping. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 24 and 234, Field Change Order No. 44 and RFI No. 89. Cost of this change is $7,318. Page 8 of 15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight(8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Buildino at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection Sionane and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 B. Pipe Diffusers for North Scrubber—This item is for work involved to install pipe diffusers, fittings and supports to eight scrubbers at the North Scrubber complex. The existing pipe diffusers were clogged and new diffusers were required for proper operation of the scrubber. The existing pipe diffusers, which are inside the scrubber, did not match with the new pipefittings. This was an unforeseen condition. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 237 and Field Change Order No. 61. Cost of this change is $3,019. C. Add 4-inch Drain at North Scrubber—This item is for work involved to run a 4-inch drain line at the North Scrubber Complex. The drain line is located on the outside of the containment wall on the west side of the existing bleach tank. This drain line will connect the new sump to an existing sump at the North Scrubber Complex. This work was performed as a result of a request from the District's Operations Department to avoid future labor involved with pumping the new sump during wet weather. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 238. Cost of this change is $4,709.00. D. Revise POTW Connection for Interolant Facility—This item is for additional costs for the POTW connection to the Interplant Chemical Facility. The connection of the new water line from the Interplant Chemical Facility to the water distribution system as shown on the drawings would have disrupted plant operations. To minimize disruptions to plant operations the new line was connected at a different location. This change includes the purchase and installation of approximately 140-feet of two-inch galvanized pipe. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Lefler No. 239 and Plan Change 19. Cost of this change is $12,459, E. Reroute Hydrogen Peroxide Pipes—This item is for work involved to reroute four 2-inch double containment hydrogen peroxide pipes at the South Scrubber Complex. The alignment of the pipes as shown on the contract drawings interfered with the walkway and needed realignment. The need for alignment was discovered prior to installation. Reference Sverdmp's Serial Letter No. 234, Field Change Order No. 49, and RFI P2-55-92. Cost of this change is $3,362. F. Additional Pipe Supports—This item is for additional work involved to install pipe supports at the Districts 5 and 6 Chemical Facility and the North Scrubber Complex. These pipe supports were not shown on the drawings and are necessary to support the pipe system and to reduce vibrations due to external loads. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 234 and Field Change Order No. 53. Cost of this change is $1,632. G. Safety Modifications to Hydrogen Peroxide Tanks—This item is for providing additional safety features to the chemical facilities and was recommended by the District's hydrogen peroxide supplier. The items added included valve locking handles, vents and repairs to the District's furnished tank. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 234 and Field Change Order No. 54. Cost of this change is $5,161.00. Portions of this work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions and negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a)of the General Provisions. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 9 of 15 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eiahl(8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianane and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $37,660.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days P1-384 ITEM 7—CHLORINATION AND PIPE MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT 1 CITY WATER PUMP STATION This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to chlorinate and disinfect water lines, air break tanks and modify pipes at Plant 1 CWPS. The Contractor disinfected the new and existing water lines as required in the contract documents but the tests conducted on water samples proved that the existing lines were contaminated. Therefore stronger doses of chlorine were used and chlorination repeated until the water samples showed absence of fecal bacteria. The piping modifications were required by the City of Fountain Valley and Orange County Health Department during their final inspection of the project. The modifications are as follows: • Remove reclaimed water line inside CWPS. • Remove 1-inch PVC line on north and east wall of building. • Reconnect 6-inch line to connection point on the side of CWPS. Delays were due to the following reasons: • District Staff reviewed this issue with the Orange County Health Department and the City of Fountain Valley and complied with their comments. • Repeated chlorination and increased frequency of sampling resulted in a longer duration for this work task. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 234 and 237 and Field Change Order Nos. 52 and 58. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $22,338.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 68 Calendar Days ITEM 8— MODIFICATIONS TO PLANT 1 CITY WATER PUMP STATION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for the following modifications at Plant 1 City Water Pump Station: A. Install Signal Generator for Medium Flow Pumps—The existing signal generator on the medium flow pumps was defective and was replaced with a new signal generator. A working signal generator was necessary to start up the CWPS. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 237 and Field Change Order No. 59. Cost of this change is $959. B. Electrical Feeder Revisions—This item is for adding conduit racks, conduits and modifying Page 10 of 15 s ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil Inc. C.O. No.: Eight(8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-35-& Process Area Fire Protection Sionaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 electrical feeders from the basement of the Metering and Diversion (M&D) structure to the CWPS. Cable trays could not be used to run the feeders because the basement of the M & D structure was reclassified as a Class I Division 2 after the award of this contract. Therefore new conduits with seal offs to meet Class I Division 2 requirements were installed. The access to the bottoms of MCC's SFA and SFB was severely limited. Therefore the existing conduit had to be shortened and routed into new sections that feed CWA and CWB. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 235 and Plan Change 34. Cost of this change is $32,690. C. Locate and Tie-in 6-inch Pipe—This item is for additional work to locate and tie in the 6-inch reclaimed waterline north of the tunnel 10 (Drawing Number 1 G-5) to the irrigation valve box. The 6-inch line was not found in the manhole as shown in the District's as-built drawings. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 234 and Field Change Order No. 46. Cost of this change is $3,719. D. Automatic cooling water for Central Generation—This change was requested by the District Operations Department to provide an automatic source of back up cooling water for the Central Generation Facility. The primary source of cooling water was reclaimed water and the back up cooling water was industrial water from the City Water Pump Station. During the construction of this project the industrial water pumps were shut down to enable the Contractor to work on the pumps. The initial plan was for Operations Staff to manually provide plant water as backup for cooling water(reclaimed water as primary source). However with reductions in Operations Staff in the recent years, Operations Staff requested an automatic back up for the cooling water system to support their lower staffing levels. This change included modifying pipes at Tunnel 10, replacing pipe supports, and installing butterfly valves, strainer, and pressure reducing and spring check valves. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 235 and Plan Change 35. Cost of this change is $38,557. E. Reroute Existing 2-inch Air Line, 8-inch Water Line and 12-inch Water Line—This item is for additional work to reroute 2-inch airline at tunnel 10 and an 8-inch water line at tunnel 11. The existing 2-inch air line was in conflict with the new line and was not shown on the plans. The 8- inch water line had to be rerouted over an opening in tunnel 11. The opening was new and was not shown on the drawings. The 12-inch line at the west perimeter road had to be rerouted to avoid conflict with the underground pipes in the area. The new alignment also required additional pavement to be removed and replaced. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 233 and 241 and Field Change Order 38 and 39. Cost of this change is $28,509. F. Connect Temporary Pumps to Surge Tank—This item is for additional work involved to connect the contract specified temporary pumps to the existing Surge Tank. Temporary pumps were installed to maintain the potable water system during modifications to the existing CWPS. The additional work included in this item was necessary to prevent water hammer during the start up of the temporary pumps. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and Field Change Order 27. Cost of this change is 2,851. G. Additional Labor Costs Due to Alarm —On April 9, 1998, a District alarm went off at the Digester area. Therefore the District's inspector directed the Contractors work force (1 foreman and 6 pipe Page 11 of 15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. 1211-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 fitters)working at the digester areas to evacuate. Due to this alarm the Contractor lost three hours of work time. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 241. Cost of this change is $1,520. H. Core Drill Walls and Footing—This item is for additional work involved in core drilling an 18-inch wall at the intersection of Tunnels 4 and 7 and another core at Tunnel 5 south of the digester area. The contract drawings showed the wall thickness to be 12 inches. The District's as-built drawings were not correct. Also, a new 6-inch diameter hole was core drilled at the CWPS perimeter footing to route new fiber optics into the CWPS as per District Staffs request. The new fiber optics tubing required a larger bending radius than the old fiber optics tubing. The routing of the new fiber optics was not included in this contract and was not known during the design phase. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 241 and 231 and Field Change Order 36. Cost of this change is $9,745. I. Repair 1-inch Vent Line and Valve—This item is for repairs to an air/vacuum release valve damaged during excavation. During excavation the Contractor inadvertently damaged a buried air/vacuum release valve on a 6-inch reclaimed water line. The location of the 6-inch line was not shown on the contract drawings or the District's as-built drawings. The work included installing tubing, fittings, and a new concrete pad to bring the air/vacuum release valve above grade. The valves were also painted to prevent corrosion. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 231 and 246 and Field Change Order 35. Cost of this change is $2.518. J. VFD Control Change—This item is for additional work to create a control change on the VFDs and field-test the changes. This change will allow the low-pressure switch shutdown to work in all panel operating positions. The contract documents required that this function work only in the"auto" position. This change will increase the operational Flexibility of the CWPS. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 246. Cost of this change is $1,069. Some portions of this work were accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions and some were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 1G-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $122,137.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days P235-9, P2-46. P255. and PI-385 ITEM 9- CREDITS The following are credit items: A. Administrative Costs for Stop Notices— During the progress of this job the District received an extraordinarily high number of stop notices from suppliers and subcontractors. This contract will be charged with the Construction Division's administrative cost to process and handle these stop notices. Credit for this change is $1,080. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 12 of 15 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Dale: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P246: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-55 B. Schedule Updates— District's contract documents indicate that the Contractor shall submit updated schedules to show work progress and justify delays to the contract. During the course of this project the contractor did not submit appropriate project progress schedules as required by the contract and requested by District. This item involves the costs associated for the Contractor's failure to submit twelve progress schedules during the thirty-four month project duration. Credit for this change is$12.000. C. Trailer Credit— During mobilization of this job, the Contractor requested to purchase trailers that were owned by the District and use them as their field office for this project. The contract documents required the trailers to be removed at the end of this project. The District had recently constructed a new Construction Management Complex and had plans to abandon the subject trailers that were 20 years old. The District sold all of the old Construction Management trailers to the Contractor in an "as is" condition with the agreement that these trailers would be removed from the District's property at the end of the project. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter No. 1 and District letter dated April 15, 1996. Credit for this change is $5,000. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a), of the General Provisions. (P2.353=25%, P246=25%, P2-55=25%, and P1-38-5=25%). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($18,080.00) TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER The Contract Documents provide for granting a time extension to the contract equal to the time of the loss beyond the control of the Contractor. Included in the contract time are ten calendar days for inclement weather. An eleven-day time extension for inclement weather in excess of ten days was granted to the contract in Change Order No. 4. This item resolves the time extension requested by the Contractor for the remainder of the contract. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section fro of the General Provisions. Reference Sverdmp's Serial Letter No. 200 and District's Letter Dated September 4, 1998. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 37 Calendar Days P13" ITEM 11 —RESOLUTION TO DISPUTED ITEMS This item provides resolution to disputed items and includes a negotiated settlement of issues disputed during the contract. The issues include disputed work in the amount of$57,548 for piping work at Page 13 of 15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eiaht (8) Date: June 23. 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P7-38.5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P246: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Plant 1 and a $104,127 request for extended overhead due to changes to the contract requested by the District. In lieu of the requested compensation and time extension, the District and the Contractor negotiated a settlement of a 52-day time extension and no added costs. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 64 of the General Provisions. Reference Sverdrup's Serial Letter Dated 242, 243 and District's letter dated April 12, 1999. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 52 Calendar Days P255 ITEM 12—ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT Item Unit Description From To Difference UP Total No. 12 CY Crushed Rock 500 0 500 $11 ($5,500) (0-12 inches) 13 CY Crushed Rock 500 0 500 $11 ($5,500) (12-24 inches) 14 CY Crushed Rock 500 0 5D0 $11 ($5,500) (24-36 inches) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($16,500.00) TIME EXTENSION THE CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $325,366.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 328 Calendar Days r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 14 of 15 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2.46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 328 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: April 8, 1996 Original Contract Time: 550 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 9, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 328 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 469 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1019 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 21, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 days Actual Final Completion Date: January 21, 1999 Original Contract Price $13,196,500.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 504,558.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 326,366.00 Amended Contract Price $14,027,424.00 Page 15 of 15 ` ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8) Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Maintenance Buildina at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Board Authorization Date: June 23. 1999 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. Contractor Date 14adonWatWwp.dtaW gWOBS S CONTRACTST215-3yoa.dw PDC COMMITTEE Meeting De Toeaoru.. 6r3-99 6.23-99 un AGENDA REPORT Hem NumW IemN Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Ludwin,trector of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-12 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, with Mike Pdich & Sons authorizing an addition of$115,000 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,392,796. SUMMARY Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work for Contract No. 6-12. There is a 10-calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date August 25, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date September 29, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date October 9, 1999 Projected Completion Date September 29, 1999 Projected Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Projected Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 2,277,796.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) $ 115,000.00 Change Orders To Date $ 115,000.00 Percentage Increase To Date 5.05 % Amended Contract Price $ 2,392,796.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 6 Item c) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Funds for this Change Order are provided by utilizing the current project contingency fund. Refer to attached Budget Information Table. i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 6-12, Fairview Relief Sewer, includes the installation of 7,714 feet of sewer pipe and associated manholes in the City of Costa Mesa. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons on June 24, 1998. The contract is 35% complete. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Sewer Encasement and Valve $115.000 10 Changed Condition Relocation Total—Change Order No. 1 1 $115,000 Change Order No. 1 adds sewer pipe encasement in an area where an existing waterline is located dose to the new sewer. The Department of Health Services requires a steel casing installation around the sewer to protect the waterline from potential sewage infiltration. The Districts design consultant, Boyle Engineering, had coordinated the sewer and waterline locations with the local water agency before any utility construction work was started. Despite these coordination efforts, the subsequent waterline construction by the water agency shifted the waterline too close to the future sewer location, thereby requiring the sewer encasement. This item would have been included in the original scope had it been discovered in the design phase of this contract. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS CEQA requirements have been met for the Fairview Relief Sewer under Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order MB:Ic G.MpkdMyenL P Ifle{am`FC(.MF 612WI A 31ME Few 1.1 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 6-12 6PR CURRENT PROPOSED .PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED �1)TFIORIZED PROJECTBUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET+, INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST. AUTHORIZATION -TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 17.000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17.000 $ 17.000 $ 4.795 28% Design Staff $ 9.120 $ 174.450 $ 174.450 $ 174.450 $ 174.450 $ 116,497 67% Consultant PSA $ 6%880 $ 117,229 $ 117,229 $ 117.229 $ 117.229 $ 106.742 91% Construction Contract $ 2.209.000 $ 2,277,796 $ 115,000 $ 2.392,796 $ 2.277,796 $ 115.000 $ 2,392,796 $ 688,949 29% Construction(Other)• $ - $ $ $ - $ 222,726 100% Construdion Staff $ 72,000 $ 390,737 $ - $ 390,737 $ 390,737 $ - $ 390.737 $ 60,061 15% Contingency $ 285.300 $ 161,088 $ (115,000) $ 46,088 1 $ TOTAL $ 2.662,300 $ 3.138,300 $ - $ 3,138.300 $ 2,977,212 $ 115,000 1 $ 3,092.212 1$ 1.199,770 39% $222,726 charge is for phase 1 of the Fairview Relief Sewer(33"VCP from Baker to Paularino Channel). It was bid and constructed with 14-1-11A (Baker-Gisler Interceptor), but charged to this job. C0612-01 BUDGET INFO6MATION TABLE F.Relise4 IMIN6 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT FAIRVIEW RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 6-12 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/24/98 $ 2,277,796.00 $ 2,277,796.00 400 400 CO NO. 1 Pending $ 115,000.00 $ 2,392,796.00 5.05% 10 410 KWip.Ma%engVobs and ConhacW 612\Change Order No,1\C01 Chngslatreport e Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Pdich & Sons C.O. No.: One 1 Dale: June 23, 1999 Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (DeduGl) $115,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —SEWER ENCASEMENT AND VALVE RELOCATION This item is for the installation of a steel casing around pan of the new 27-inch sewer and the relocation of an existing water valve. The Department of Health Services requires encasement of 60 feet of the proposed sewer due to its proximity to an existing waterline. In addition, an existing water valve located in the sewer alignment within those 60 feet had to be relocated. The work included trench excavation, shoring, sewer pipe installation inside steel casing, welding, valve installation, backfill and paving. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $115.000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $115,000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10 Calendar Days t Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: One 1 Date: June 23, 1999 Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12 The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a ten calendar day time extension is required for this change order, and that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 25, 1998 Original Contract Time: 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 29, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 10 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 10 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 410 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 9, 1999 Projected Completion Date: September 29, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None Actual Final Completion Date: NIA Original Contract Price $ 2,277,796.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Bedust) $ 115,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,392,796.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: One 1 Date: June 23 1999 Job: Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12 Board Authorization Date: June 23, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MIKE PRLICH & SONS Contractor Date H:%WP DTA*NGIENGTORMWOTOR PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.of DU. 6/3/99 6/23/99 AGENDA REPORT ttem Numbe Iem NIImMr Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Lu wi , irector of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Project Manager SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1. to provide additional construction support services in the amount of$37.502, increasing the total Professional Services Agreement amount to a not to exceed price of$375,056. SUMMARY The original allocation for construction support services was $7,759 for Contract No. 3-38, which was subsequently split into three separate contracts: 3-38-1, 3-38-2 and 3-38-3, including the Brea Creek Channel Improvements, a County of Orange Contract. Based on recent experiences on Imperial Highway in the City of La Habra, (Contract No. 3-38-3), the District expects many of the same type of issues and problems to occur on Contract No. 3-38-1. These are mainly constructibility issues related to stabilization of the pipe trench foundation due to poor soil conditions, traffic control problems, dewatering, etc. The complexity of this construction project will be further compounded by an existing parallel trunk sewer that is located approximately six feet from the new trench. Protection of this parallel trunk sewer will most likely require an extensive beam and plating shoring system. The District will have full control over the expenditure of consultant time for these issues and they will be on an as-needed basis. The costs are based on a not to exceed price. If the service is not requested, the money will not be spent. Due to the long length of this project and other issues sited above, staff feels that the amount and need for these services is justified. G Impla4aMend a G8M1 Repdit lADDENDUM 4 05235 -W-1 Add 4 ARM23N dot R—. � Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total additional fee proposed for this work is $37,502, increasing the Professional Services Agreement amount to a not to exceed price of$375,056. Please refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1998-99 Budget Collection System Improvement,Zone 3, Line F) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The work to be performed under proposed Addendum No. 4 is shown in Exhibit "A". ALTERNATIVES Do not issue Addendum. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The Final EIR was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Exhibit "A" (Proposal letter from Boyle Engineering Corporation dated April 1, 1999) BP:jak PcobaftWatal CdglobaMllenda Draft ReporlsTMl 3e-11439.1 Add 4V3&1 Add 4AR062399.dot G 1'1." .N .nda Drzli R.,.PDL l ADDEN.V.d D923.a lAOd I AR.$ EM R-. Y 8 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 20000 $ 1000 $ - $ 1000 $ 1000 $ - $ 1000 $ 1.000 100% Design Staff $ 153,000 $ 172,000 $ - $ 172,000 $ 172,000 $ - $ 172,000 $ 154.000 90% ConsuBant PEA $ 300.000 $ 220,000 $ 220.000 $ 171.500 $ 37,502 $ 209.002 $ 165.000 79% Construction Contract $ 4,308,000 $ 8 508 000 $ 8,508,000 $ 8,363,796 -; $ 8,363,796 Construction Other $ 30000 $ 200000 $ 200000 ;: $ 200000 $ 200000 $ 23000 12% Construction Staff $ 200,000 $ 1 120 000 $ 1,120,000 $ 1,120,000 $ 1,120,000 $ 26,447 2% Contingency $ 914,000 $ 840 000 $ 840,000 $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 5,925,000 $ 11,061,000 $ - $ 11,061,000 „ $ 10.028,296 $ 37502 $ 10,065,798 $ 369,447 4% G:NtglobaMgenda Draft ReportsWDCll l ADDENDUM 4.062399TTd-38-1 budgehbleAEd 4.AslDistri Professional Services Agreement Status Report Contract No. 338 IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM Total Project Budget: $10,125,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Date of Project: 2-9-94 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 1/12/94 Original PSA Engineering services for preparation of plans and $289,946 $289.946 specifications and construction support 5/20/97 1 Additional design to incorporate new street $17,816 $307,762 improvements after original design was complete 12/17/97 2 Additional design to accommodate CALTRANS $23,404 $331,166 permitting requirements 9/23/98 3 Engineering services to revise topography on $6,388 $337,554 design plans to incorporate new street improvements 4/7/99 4 Construction support services $37,502 $375,056 WntglobalWgenda D2fi RepaftTDCl1 l ADDENDUM 4.D423991i38 PSA SIatm Repaftadd 4.dw 04/20/99 Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Contract No. 3-38-1 PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 4 FEE SUMMARY Current Revision Amended Total Engineering Services $307,166 — $307,166 Additions Construction Phase ` $34,124 $34,124 Fixed Profit $30.388 $3,378 $33.766 TOTAL $337,554 $37.502 $375,056 ` Based on hourly rates plus overhead at 182.8% BP:jak H1wp.dtaWngVOBS 8 CONTRACTS3-38-1 N11w Holder Reach 1%3-Wi pmp.add.4 fee a .nce s EXHIBIT A ! F30YLE E/'7G//7EER//7G COR1:-MRR7'/0r7 1501 Quail Street P.O. Box 3030 949 /476 - 3300 Newport Beach, CA 92659.9020 FAX 949 i 721 - 7142 David A. Ludwin, PE,Director of Engineering April 12, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Contract No. 3-38-1 The plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-38-1 have been completed and the District is preparing to award the construction contract. The City of Buena Park and Caltrans have imposed requirements that are quite restrictive, adding to the duration of the construction period and the corresponding coordination effort during the construction phase. District staff has indicated because of the length and complexity of this contract they desire an increased construction support effort on our part on an as requested basis, in which we concur. Construction support activities that the District staff envisions include the following tasks: • Review shop drawings submitted by the Contractor. • Assist with preparation and attend public information meetings REQUIRED BY THE City of Buena Park, as requested by the District. Two such meetings are assumed. • Attend meetings and provide on-going coordination with permitting agencies (City and Caltrans), as requested by the District. • Attend a pre-construction meeting and periodic meetings to discuss construction issues twice a month for a 12-month period during peak construction activity. • Furnish consultation and advice to District staff as requested during construction. • Provide to District responses to contractor requests for information(RFI). • Review and provide support for preparation of change orders, as requested by the District. • Assist in preparation of plan changes, as requested by the District. David A. Ludwin, PE April 12, 1999 Page • Prepare record drawings when construction has been completed and accepted by the District. Some permitting issues during the design phase have required additional effort on our part. These include the City's concern with the coordination of the District's trunk sewer construction along Artesia Blvd.with that of their street improvement project and support to the District requesting Caltrans relaxation of the very restrictive permitted working hours. The original allocation for construction support was$7,759. Subsequently, Contract No. 3-38 was divided into three reaches with a corresponding number of construction contracts. Further, the portion crossing the Brea Creek Channel was separated and included in construction of the County's Brea Creek Channel improvements. Construction Contract No. 3-38-1 is the last reach of the Contract No. 3-38 Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer to be constructed. Addendum No. 3 included an additional allowance of$5,000 for construction support. However, as a result of the permitting issues,the budget remaining for construction support has been depleted The construction contract duration is 18 months. Enclosed is a proposed project budget itemizing the man-hour effort by task and a fee summary reflecting the proposed contract revision. For the 18-month construction period the proposed construction support budget represents approximately 4 hours per week divided equally between an associate engineer and a senior engineer. This is to request consideration to increase our fee for the construction support effort described above for this last construction contract. We are available to review this with you at your convenience. Boyle Engineering Corporation -CSC, �- . 5w� Philip E. Stone, PE Project Manager Copy to: Chuck Winsor- OCSD OC-CO3-I0D-0MFC/PmpAdN,.dm 1 Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Contract No. 3-38 PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 4 FEE SUMMARY Change per Existing Addendum Amended Agreement No. 4 Agreement Engineering Services * $307,166 $34,124 $341,290 Fixed Profit $30,388 $3,378 $33,766 Total $337,554 $37,502 $375,056 * Based on hourly rates plus overhead at 182.8% FeeAdd4.doc Project Budget Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Orange County Sanitation District Contract No. 3-38 ADDENDUM NO. 4 Personnel Hours o _`o m m m i W n a° a _s p a S Q 0 e n o o e 6` U F 4 L Construction Support for Contract No.3-38-1 S E 1. Review shop drawing submituls by the Contractor 4 24 4 32 E Z502 E 2,502 2. Anist with preparation and attend public information meetings• 8 4 1 8 20 E 1,793 E 1.793 3. Anatol meanings and provide on-going coordination with pernnitiftag a C. 24 16 8 2 50 f 5,091 $ 5,091 . AOend preconstruction and periodic meetings• 35 35 1 1 4 74 E 7.357 7,357 5. Famish consultation to DistrictsteR 48 20 8 76 S 9.420 S 8.420 6. Respond to contractor RFI'a 16 24 2 42 S 3.971 f 3.971 7. provide change order support 8 8 16 E 1,640 f IMO 8. Assist in preparation of plan than es. 2 4 4 10 $ 796 $ 796 . Prepare record drawings. 0 40 44 E M64 E 2.564 E E u 145 179 16 52 12 364 f 71,124 f S 34,12/ Tot81 145 1 16 f2 13 361 5 34,Iz4 f f J1,17A Amounts shown ixlude direct labor plus over cad. •NOTES: Personnel Cacao ry AIR I. Two public information meetings included. Principal Engineer S 130.00 2. Assume 5 meetings with permitting agmcics plus coordination effort Associate Engineer S 75.00 3.Assume 2 meetiopinconeh for 12 months during peak contraction—24 meetings Tratfm Engiucer f 85.00 plus promnstmction meeting. Total=25 mcctings. CADOperatur f 56.60 Word Pmccssm S 45.50 artaes Pace t of s ewm a�,,aa co am._ PDC COMMITTEE n ng Dme To ad.of ar. 6/3/99 6/23/99 AGENDA REPORT IDem NumW Item N/''YY umMr PDC99-31 /�!/r� Orange County Sanitation District l FROM: David Ludwl , Director of Engineering Originator: John Linder, Construction Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, AND MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. P-182 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Converse Consultants, Law/Crandall, and Ninyo & Moore, providing for geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment and materials testing services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-182, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extension ($450,000 per year total) to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. SUMMARY Professional Services Agreements for geotechnical services were approved by the Board on June 24, 1998. The recommendation for the approval by the PDC Committee on June 4, 1998, included a requirement that the PDC Committee approve any extension to the contract. The PSAs for each of the three Consultants were for an amount not to exceed $100,000 per year, each with provisions for two, one-year extensions. The recommendation is to not only approve the contract extension, but to increase the yearly amount from $100,000 to $150,000. The increased amount is needed to support the planned expansion of the capital improvement program. The performance of all three fines has been consistent and satisfactory with the requirements of the contracts. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The services of the selected consultants will be expensed to each project for which the services are required. Each job and/or contract has funds included in the budget to cover these services for both the design and construction phases of a project. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) o mpim,��,a.own aromwoo..amm a.vw.os+ez as RM, Page 1 This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid for separately as a lump sum item. It is expensed separately as the services are used by each individual project budget that requires the services. Each time the services are used it is charged to the applicable individual project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment and material testing services for the District's design and construction projects have traditionally been provided by the private sector. Preliminary geotechnical engineering is normally included as part of the design phase of the scope of work and is provided by the project design consultants. The majority of the geotechnical engineering testing services is used during the construction phase of a project. In addition, all of the concrete and other materials testing are performed during the construction phase. During March 1998 requests for proposals were solicited from nine firms for geotechnical, engineer, environmental site assessment, and materials testing services. Nine proposals were received and evaluated. Staff recommended three contracts with three separate firms to provide geotechnical engineering, environmental site assessment, and materials testing services similar to the authorization granted by the Board of Directors in 1997. Each contract has duration of one year, which the PDC Committee could extend for two additional one-year contract periods. One of the outcomes of the Strategic Plan identified a rapid and large increase in the Capital Improvement Program. With this new information, the Engineering Department Is planning on increasing the design and construction effort to accommodate the needs of the District. We now project that additional geotechnical support and materials testing will be needed to support the planned expansion of the capital improvements. Staff recommends approval of extension of Professional Services Agreements with Converse Consultants, Law/Crandall, and Ninyo & Moore for$150,000 per year each for a one-year contract, which could be extended for one additional one-year contract period by approval of the PDC Committee. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS NIA JDL Ic M My NbryW65&C ACT9 9T�Hepnµ JWR Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE *,6,/' 6/2G2 oile TT BE.Gf Dr. 3/99 AGENDA REPORT Itrm GD N9-32 I Nu um Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Ludwirt, irector of Engineering Originator. John Linder, Construction Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. P-183 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with DGA Consultants, Inc., Bush &Associates, Inc., and Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc., providing for surveying services for collection system and treatment plant projects, Specification No. P-183, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 per year for each consultant, with provisions for one one-year extension ($450,000 per year total), to be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. SUMMARY Professional Services Agreements for surveying services were approved by the Board on June 24, 1998. The recommendation for the approval by the PDC Committee on June 4, 1998 included a requirement that the PDC Committee approve any extension to the contract. The PSAs for each of the three Consultants were for an amount not to exceed $100,000 per year, each with provisions for two, one-year extensions. The recommendation is to not only approve the contract extension, but to increase the yearly amount from $100,000 to $150,000. The increased amount is needed to support the planned expansion of the Capital Improvement Program. The performance of all three firms has been consistent and satisfactory with the requirements of the contracts- PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The services of the selected consultants will be expensed to each project for which the services are required. Each job and/or contract has funds included in the budget to cover these services for both the design and construction phases of a project. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G.MryRiRNpxWp RW VDLW�.IW" RM comae Page 1 This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid for separately as a lump sum item. It is expensed separately as the services are used by each individual project budget that requires the services. Each time the services are used it is charged to the applicable individual project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Surveying services for the District's design and construction projects have traditionally been provided by the private sector. Preliminary surveys are normally included as part of the design phase of the scope of work and are provided by the project design consultants. The majority of the surveying services are used during the construction phase of a project. During March 1998 requests for proposals were solicited from eight firms for surveying services. Eight proposals were received and evaluated. Staff recommended three contracts with three separate firms to provide surveying services similar to the authorization granted by the Board of Directors in 1997. Each contract has duration of one year, which the PDC Committee could extend for two additional one-year contract periods. One of the outcomes of the Strategic Plan identified a rapid and large increase in the Capital Improvement Program. With this new information, the Engineering Department is planning on increasing the design and construction effort to accommodate the needs of the District. We now project that additional surveying services will be needed to support the planned expansion of the capital improvements Staff recommends approval of extension of Professional Services Agreements with Bush &Associates, DGA Consultants and Forkert Engineering for$150,000 each for a one-year contract, which could be extended for one additional one-year contract period by approval of the PDC Committee. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A JDL]c c\iEMRJBenev Repon cpecen Reweee. Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE M ngo TOBd.ofMr. s3-ss suss AGENDA REPORT mnu ee ItemN �ev 'as Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering Originator: Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: APPROVE ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers; Krieger& Stewart, Inc.; Lee & Ro, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc.; and Tran Consulting Engineers, for professional engineering services related to (small projects) for Facilities Engineering Consulting Services for an amount no to exceed $160,000 each, for a total of$800,000. SUMMARY The Director of Engineering has been delegated the authority to solicit professional engineering services to expedite designs related to small capital projects. The Board resolution allows for the renewal of the contracts on an annual basis. In May 1998, the Board of Directors approved Professional Service Agreements with six general service consulting firms. Five of the six consultants under contract have provided various professional services to the District over the past year. The sixth consultant could not offer services at a competitive price, therefore, it is not recommended to extend their contract. The Director of Engineering recommends an Addendum be approved for five of the six Professional Services Agreements (PSAs) extending each for the fiscal year (FY) 1999-2000. The contracts will provide for engineering studies, detailed designs, and construction support services, on an as-needed basis in an amount not to exceed $160,000 for each consultant. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. Staff is requesting approval of$25,000 for project development. These costs include research, coordination with other departments, and defining each individual task. Also requested is $270,000 for project management and control by engineering staff for each project. c.Hb�wn°e�m Dort aewaeocaam omw.aoc Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Fv99-00) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Engineering Design Division is tasked with executing small capital projects from inception through design and construction. A"small capital project' is defined as a "replacement or repairs project related to plant safety, reliability, and efficiency enhancements, where professional consulting services are estimated to be in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for each project" Most small projects originate in the Operations and Maintenance Department. Due to the high backlog of small projects, the Board of Directors agreed at the September 1997 Workshop, that a program should be developed that would allow the District's Engineering Department to have multiple professional engineering firms under a yearly PSA. By having engineering consultants under contract to perform work on an as-needed basis, the design of the small projects can be completed in a more efficient manner. In December 1997, the Board approved Resolution 97-37, subsequently modified by Resolution 98-8, which allows for the implementation of annual contracts with multiple firms for the design of small projects. The Board subsequently approved six annual PSAs with: Cathgart Garcia and von Langan Engineers; Krieger& Stewart, Inc.; MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc.; Train Consulting Engineers; HDR Engineers; and Lee & Ro for the design of small projects in the FY98/99. Each of the six PSAs is for an amount not to exceed $160,000. Under the Facilities Engineering Program, the Design Division Staff directs the work of each consultant. As each individual small project is developed, Staff defines the Scope of Work and produces a Task Order that is submitted to a minimum of two consultants. The consultants propose a method, fee, and services, to complete the Task Order. The fee is based upon the hourly rate of each firth. The hourly rates were submitted by each consultant during the Request for Proposal process for the FY98/99. The fee limit of each Task Order is $50,000 as required by Resolution No. 98-8, and is approved by the Director of Engineering. If the necessary consulting fee is over$50,000, then the approval of a separate PSA is brought to the PDC/Board of Directors for approval. The Director of Engineering recommends that an agreement addendum not be offered to HDR Engineers. HDR has submitted task order proposals, however, the quoted fee has not been competitive. HDR Engineers has not received any work through this program. G NpbC Wf^�OM R W uk➢IX:1BYfG KKA'I be Page 2 The program to date has provided more efficient use of staff time by eliminating 17 agenda packages, that under other existing policies and procedures for the acquisition of professional services, would have been forwarded to the Board for consideration. The total design fee used to date is $251,000, which includes 17 Task Orders, producing 15 detailed designs. The construction of all small projects follows the established policies and procedures for the acquisition of contracting services. Staff will continue to provide the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee a summary of the work authorized on a quarterly basis. This report will provide information related to the Tasks Orders issued, fees spent, and remaining funds available, for each Consultant PSA. ALTERNATIVES The Board may decline to award these Professional Services Agreements Addenda. The result will be a delay in the completion of each small project by approximately three months. This will impact the backlog of projects and require District staff to prepare separate Agenda Items for each small project that requires outside professional services. CEQA FINDINGS Each individual project will be subject to CEQA review. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Table for Each PSA 3. Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Table JRH:jo:jak G:htgloO Mgenda Draft Rep0fta\POC�9-00 060999 Coc G YpkNrJµ+4e peM1 RepcRf➢LLW NKISW.ds Raval, eadaa Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,OD0 $ 25,000 0% Design Staff $ 285.000 $ $ 270,OD0 $ 270,000 0% Consultant PSA $ 1,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 800.000 0% Construction Contract $ 1.100.000 $ $ 0% Construction(Other) $ 120,000 $ $ 0% Construction Staff $ 200,000 $ $ 0% Contingency $ 270.000 $ $ 0% TOTAL $ 3,000,0D0 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,095.000 $ 1,095,000 $ - 0% Note: The Authorized Budget is included with the FY99-00 CIP b\wp Eta\engumell pre,Ms\annual aonbads\99-00 budget table05O599 0/tV99 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Facilities Engineering Consulting Services Total Project Budget: 16$ 0,000 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Start Date of Project: July 1998 Date Addendum Description Accumulated Costs 7115198 Original PSA Small Projects Consultant $160 000 Addendum 1 Renew Original Contract $160,000' The accumulated cost is a total not to exceed amount for Fiscal Year 99-00. The unused funds from Fiscal Year 98-99 are NOT additive to the Fiscal Year 99-00 year budget. H1wp.dla"ISM-PR0JECTSNNNUAL CONTRACTSM-M CONSULTANTSytewn I PSA TCE SMua Repod.dw 0524/99 ReVISW 0`WI4 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Facilities Engineering Consulting Services Total Project Budget: $160,000 Consultant: MacDonald-Stephens Enaineers Start Date of Project: July 1990 Date Addendum Description Accumulated Costs 7/15198 Original PSA Small Projects Consultant $160.000 Addendum 1 Renew Original Contract $160 000' The accumulated cost is a total not to exceed amount for Fiscal Year 99-00. The unused funds from Fiscal Year 98-99 are NOT additive to the Fiscal Year 99-00 year budget. %YmdonWe lM p.dlo"n M-PROJECTSWNNUAL GONTRACTS19A00 CONSULTANT51Rewn I PSA MSE W.Reped.dw 05124/99 Revised 0S/14M c� Professional Services Agreement Status Report Facilities Engineering Consulting Services Total Project Budget: $160,000 Consultant: Lee & Ro. lncoroorated Start Date of Project: July 1998 Date Addendum Description Accumulated Costs 7115198 Original PSA Small Projects Consultant $160,000 Addendum 1 Renew Original Contract $160,000' The accumulated cost is a total not to exceed amount for Fiscal Year 99-00. The unused funds from Fiscal Year 98-99 are NOT additive to the Fiscal Year 99-00 year budget. N:Wmp.MMIMVLW-PROJECTSNNNUAL CONTRACTS%DWCONSULTANTSytevm I PSA LS R SNWe Repod.dw 0624/99 Revbed 05/14SO Professional Services Agreement Status Report Facilities Engineering Consulting Services Total Project Budget: 16$ 0,000 Consultant: Krieger& Stewart. Incorporated Start Date of Project: July 1998 Date Addendum Description Accumulated Costs 7/15/98 Original PSA Small Projects Consultant $160,000 Addendum 1 Renew Original Contract $160 000' The accumulated cost is a total not to exceed amount for Fiscal Year 99-00. The unused funds from Fiscal Year 98-99 are NOT additive to the Fiscal Year 99-00 year budget. N:"AIa" M-PROJECTSNNNUAL CONTRACTSM-00 CONSULTANTSytmm I PSA K&S Statue ReW.dw 0524/99 Re wd 05114M .ue� - Professional Services Agreement Status Report Facilities Engineering Consulting Services Total Project Budget: $160.000 Consultant: Cathaart Garcia and von Langan Engineers Start Date of Project: July 1998 Date Addendum Description Accumulated Costs 7/15/98 Original PSA Small Projects Consultant $160 000 Addendum 1 Renew Original Contract $160 000' The accumulated cost is a total not to exceed amount for Fiscal Year 99-00. The unused funds from Fiscal Year 98-99 are NOT additive to the Fiscal Year 99-00 year budget. H:Wp.dlabng\SM-PROJECTSNNNUAL CONTRACTS59W CONSULTANTS1Rexm I PSA CGA Shtw Repardw M4/99 Revised OW14M FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY JULY 1, 1998-MARCH 31,1999 CUMMULATNE COSTFOR CONTRACT VALUE COST OF TASK AWARDED TASKS Cathgart Garcia Von Langan $160,000 99-01 Grit Removal System $ 19,500 $ 19,500 99-10 Additional Automation for Grit Removal System $ 2,800 $ 22,300 99-15 Sunflower Drive Mechanical Study $ 22.660 $ 44,960 HDR Engineering $150,000 None to Date Krieger S Stewart $150.000 99.07 WSSPS Additional Pumping Systems $ 23.000 $ 23,000 Lee S Flo,Incorporated $160.000 99-12 Gas Monitoring System $ 7.500 $ 7,500 99-13 Improvements to CenGen Starling Air $ 5.000 $ 12,500 99-14 Slater Avenue Pump Station Pump Access $ 1,254 $ 13,750 MacDonald-Stephens,Engineers,Incorporated $160.000 99-03 Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent $ 28.800 $ 28,800 99-04 M&D Electrical Room Modification $ 19.750 $ 48,550 99-08 Drainage Modifications $ 7,900 $ 56,450 99-16 Cable Tray Improvement Study $ 18,750 $ 46,400 Tran Consulting $160,000 99-02 Grit Chamber Channel Modification $ 15,000 $ 15,000 99-05 Screening Compactors Installation $ 16,000 $ 31,000 99-06 Chlorine Building Mech. Equip.Demolition $ 10,000 $ 41,000 99-09 Ocean Outfall Flow Meter Replacement Study $ 10,000 $ 51,000 99-11 Grit Chamber Channel Modification(addl work $ 14,050 $ 65,050 99-17 Ocean Curtail Flow Meter Replacement Design $ 48,500 $ 113,550 As of April 21, 1999 K1 p.cHaWnguim rclecsITa O rsrfask ON Summery N194K "'ms DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, June 9, 1999, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on June 9, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Director Pat McGuigan Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers Shawn Boyd Michael Morris, Legacy Partners John M. Gullixson Don Hughes Shirley McCracken Ryal Wheeler Mark A- Murphy James W. Silva STAFF PRESENT: Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jan Debay, Board Chair Bob Doter, Director of Operations & Maintenance Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Mike White, Controller Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. OCSD • PO Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 June 9, 1999 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS , Michael Morris of Legacy Partners spoke to the Directors regarding an item on the agenda in connection with a request for a refund of connection fees paid between December 1998 and May 1999. Higher fees are being paid than those fees required when the new fee ordinance is adopted at the July 1999 regular board meeting. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried to consider Agenda Item No. 13(c) at this time. The Directors entered into a discussion, asking questions of staff and General Counsel. (13) C. FAHR99-45: 1) Receive and file letter dated May 12, 1999 from Legacy Partners, requesting a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels paid in December 1998 and January 1999, and a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for two parcels to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates, in the amount of$183,896.00; 2) Deny request for partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels/permits paid in December 1998 and January 1999; 3) Approve request to grant fee reduction for two parcels/permits to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates. Motion: Moved and seconded to approve staff's recommendation. It was further moved to declare rates retroactive effective April 10, 1999 for those property owners who have pulled permits after this date. Director Shirley McCracken opposed. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the May 12, 1999 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Director John Gullixson abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the $1.8 million bond issue regarding water issues, including funds for reclamation and watershed management, continues to move through committee and is targeted for the March 2000 ballot. Mr. McIntyre will keep Directors informed as the bill moves along. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 June 9, 1999 Mr. Anderson reported that the investigation had been completed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board into the July 1998 Newport Beach sewer spill. It was determined by the Regional Board staff that the District was at fault and a $50,000 fine would be imposed, of which $40,000 could be met by implementing an environmental enhancement project. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance briefly reported on items listed on the Consent Calendar. Mr. Streed also announced that he had received notice that the District received the Government Finance Officers Association award for last year's budget. It was also reported that the required notice for the public hearing and proposed connection fee structure change was mailed to over 26,000 vacant parcels. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources briefly reported on a grievance which had been filed by an employee and would be going to the Board this month. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, reminded the Directors of the Strategic Plan Workshop to be held on June 19, 1999 to review the EIR. Distribution of this EIR is scheduled for June 29'". A public hearing will need to be scheduled for this EIR. After discussion among the Directors, it was recommended that the hearing be held during the Board meeting scheduled for July 21, 1999. Since there will be two public hearings for that evening, it was suggested that the Board Meeting begin at 6:30 p.m. for this meeting only, and the hearings be scheduled at 7:00 p.m. and at 8:00 p.m. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Mr. Woodruff advised the Committee of a need to add three items re litigation to the Closed Session Agenda, each of which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- F) A. FAHR99-38: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 June 9, 1999 B. FAHR99-39: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR99-40: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of May 19, 1999. D. FAHR99-41: Receive and file 1999100 Strategic Goals Workplans E. FAHR99-42: Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period June 25, 1999 to May 15, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $890.250. F. FAHR99-50: 1) Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-186)to the following support staffing fines for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agency • Apple One Technical Aaencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems - IT Personnel • Lab Support- Laboratory personnel 2)Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firths, as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A) through 12(F) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- F) A. FAHR9943: Approve agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) in connection with transferring assets and service responsibility for Park Place (Michelson Station) Service Area to IRWD, at no additional cost to the District. This item was removed from the agenda by staff without discussion or action. B. FAHR99-44: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 June 9, 1999 Service Charges for FY 1999-2000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation, amending the Resolution to use adopted rates for Revenue Area 1 rather than the proposed rates. Directors John Gullixson and Shirley McCracken opposed. D. FAHR99-46: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolutions Nos. OCSD 98-8, OCSD 98-12, OCSD 98-22, and OCSD 98-43. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to continue this item to the July 14t" FAHR meeting. E. FAHR99-47: Approve proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self- Insurance Budgets for 1999-00, as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $44,000,000 Workers Compensation Self-Insurance 330,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 792,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 68,771,000 Collection System Operating 9,356,500 Collection System Capital Improvement 23,629,000 Debt/COP Service 41,690,000 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. Director John Gullixson opposed. F. FAHR99-48: 1) Recommend that the Board adopt, in concept, Resolution No. OCSD 99- , Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; and 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations and return to the Board for final adoption with any recommended modifications. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS There were none Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 June 9, 1999 (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for July 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add three items needing immediate attention that arose subsequent to the publication of the Agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. It was moved, seconded and unanimously carried that pending litigation matters entitled Sangerrnano v. County Sanitation Districts, OCSC Case No. 732680, County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, et al., OCSC Case No. 722816, and Deese v. County Sanitation Districts, at al., OCSC Case No. 786591, be added to the Agenda for discussion and action as Agenda Items Nos. 19(A)(2), 19(A)(3), and 19(A)(4). The Committee convened in dosed session at 7:48 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Items Nos. 19(A)(1), (2). (3), and (4). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION Al 8:33 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 7 June 9, 1999 (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:33 p.m. Submitted by: Pantry M. K FAHR Committee Secr ry H�e emxe.m.varmvwsaw�.naovw uxve: FAHR COMMITTEE Meebng Date To3LB0s. 06/09/99 06/23/99 AGENDA REPORT l N;jb 'thl[_7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 1999 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ��awwu��.yaeam2�acn..ru�n�an,w.�uwmEMm.�wooas e..a.a 1a17re7 Page 1 c ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of May 1999 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts May 31, 1999 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $29,915,784 5.0 Union Bank Checking Account 358.323 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3,342,000 4.0 PIMCO—Short4erm Portfolio 18,779,652 4.4 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 301,141,784 4.6 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 9,230 5.0 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,196,818 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 — TOTAL $385,747,991 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report GGS:SKIc \y0mbalalYq NaNn\$1C1c*arofAHR1Fa�FAJunBnRFARRJunW Eoc Rmuf Id1797 Page . • 11 1 / 1 11 1111111111 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII \\\ \\ \\\\ \\` \\\\ \\ 1 / 11 / 1 / 1 r��Y� •-cccl XXXON4 •'WYy r�-w'1 cr•-•'� �•iO.O•• !••••••••� �•�•••�•�� iiiii iiiii' iiiii ••••� ♦•••� ♦•••� ♦••.4 ♦•••� •-••H OV • o R ' a l l� • 1 • MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 May 1999) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $18 782,097 Me11Con0 $18:779,652 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $18831,940 • Mellon $18:831,935 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.37 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of I%Change: $70,171 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 22% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return ("/9) Portfolio Index by Period: l Month: 0.38 0.38 3 Months: 1.24 1.14 12 Months: 5.31 4.76 Year-to-Date: 1.96 1.86 H.L..IFIN.4NCE11101KOZ4KMMPLEL190599.RPT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 31 May 1999) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p��,{ $302,172,257 Mellon $301,141,794 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $304,905,185 • Mellon $306,054,953 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.46 Of Index: 2.37 15.1.3 1%. INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%"Change: $7,514,241 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 6% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 1 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: (0.42) (0.39) 3 Months: 0.63 0.76 12 Months: 5.45 5.24 Year-to-Date: 0.33 0.35 H.L..WINANCEII/0WOVAUMPLE470599.RPT OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-MAY-1999 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORK PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,651,631.09 2,651,631.09 13.981 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS INN IYR 3,350,799.17 3,350,799.17 17.66% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2,440,218.06 2,440,218.06 12.86% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 889,080.00 889,080.00 4.69% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 112,262.87 112,262.87 0.59% 0.00 5,166.28 4.60 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,443,991.19 9,443,991.19 49.78% 0.00 5.166.28 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. AGENCIES 4,698,304.60 4,692,574.00 24.74% -5,730.60 225,945.00 4.91 BANKING 4 FINANCE 2,409,$85.50 2,379,720.00 12.541 -29,665.50 202,250.00 8.50 INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 855,576.00 4.51% -8,177.00 60,562.50 7.08 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 1,416,501.00 1,407,791.00 7.42% -8,710.00 105,700.00 7.51 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 9,387,944.10 9,335,661.00 49.21% -52,283.10 594,457.50 6.37 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 190,085.40 190,085.40 1.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 190,085.40 190,085.40 1.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS �6�6619,022, -020.69 n� 18,969,737.59 100.00% -52, eves 283.10 --599,623.78 3.16 Page 1 0CSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-MAY-1999 HB1100 9 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 4,317,686.52 4,317,686.52 1.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -21,312,706.25 -21,312,706.25 -6.98% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 7,346,088.68 7,346,000.68 2.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 273,576.71 273,576.71 0.09% 0.00 12,589.86 4.60 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS -9,375,354.34 -9,375,354.34 -3.07% 0.00 12,589.86 -0.13 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 136,283,536.53 133,932,474.86 43.861 -2,351,061.67 8,450,974.44 6.31 U.S. AGENCIES 49,211,324.49 48,183,755.48 15.78% -1,027,569.01 3,057,467.66 6.35 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,341,093.75 16,166,247.50 5.291 -174,846.25 1,057,500.00 6.54 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,546,637.51 4,531,495.94 1.48% -15,141.57 308,852.54 6.82 FHLMC POOLS 10,983,488.79 10,919,953.53 3.58% -63,535.26 757,015.84 6.93 FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,585,122.07 6,599,845.43 2.16% 14,723.36 404,660.76 6.13 FNMA POOLS 725,893.75 727,036.20 0.24% 1,142.45 42,113.70 5.79 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 157,295.93 157,867.58 0.05% 571.65 9,752.35 6.18 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 3,995,792.99 4,020,314.97 1.32% 24,521.98 231,000.18 5.75 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 991,720.00 0.32% -8,280.00 62,000.00 6.25 BANKING 4 FINANCE 60,913,927.57 60,594,595.94 19.84% -319,341.63 3,614,398.05 5.96 INDUSTRIAL 15,037,689.00 14,220,491.40 4.66% -817,197.60 1,162,527.00 8.10 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 2,002,700.00 0.66% -148,550.00 164,000.00 8.19 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,468,650.00 2.45% -28,605.00 450,000.00 6.03 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 315,430,307.38 310,517,138.83 101.69% -4,913,168.55 19,772,263.32 6.37 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,210,340.73 4,210,340.73 1.38% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ ------- --___--- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,210,340.73 4,210,340.73 1.38% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ___we<m---- --------------wee -----------=wee -------------___ NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 310,265,293.77 305,352,125.22 100.00% -4,913,168.55 19,784,B53.18 6.48 Pepe 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 OCSF07511102 1999/05/31 RUN DATE : 06/03/99 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MAAXEY TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NOUN YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 112,262.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HURT .000 4.602 AAA IDO.000 112,262.87 1.18 996085247 112,262.87 .60 3,400,000.00 US TREASURY BILLS 4.593 .000 P-1 98.553 3,350,799.17 35.48 912395CN9 09/09/1999 DO 03/11/99 3,350,799.17 13.84 200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.842 .000 F-1 99.133 198,266.67 2.09 19121ET09 06/11/1999 198,266.67 1.06 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NOW LN MTG CORP DISC 4.846 .000 P-1 97.609 2,440,218.06 25.83 313396NTG MAT 11/02/1999 2,440,218.06 12.99 900,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL HTG ASSN DISC NT 4.859 .000 P-1 98.7B7 B89,080.00 9.41 313588KV6 MAT O9/2411999 889,080.00 4.33 700,000.00 USAA CAP C0OP DISC 4.83E .000 P-1 99.128 693,895.42 3.34 90320BTB7 06/11/1999 693,695.42 3.69 900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 4.901 .000 P-1 93.933 881,400.00 9.33 61166BWO 09/23/1999 881,400.00 4.69 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 4.940 ADO P-1 97.563 870,069.00 9.29 30142UT30 11/03/1999 878,069.00 4.68 ________ ______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.631 .090 9,443,991.19 100.00 9,443,991.19 50.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LA NTG CORP DEW .000 4.307 AAA 99.953 999,200.00 10.30 3134A3RT5 MEG AT 05/13/2000 DO 05/18/99 199,530.00 5.32 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BR CONS NOR 4.860 4.844 AAA 99.812 3,699,104.60 39.55 3133M7EN2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO O1/28/99 3,693,044.OD 19.63 500,000.00 DOME ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF M1G 5.001 3.912 AA3 101.110 511,200.00 5.41 264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DD 11/01/94 505,550.00 2.69 500,000.00 CHRYSL.ER FIRL CO LLC 5.119 12.883 Al 102.849 529,010.00 5.50 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 514,245.OD 2.74 YLDANAL YIELD ARALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSP03511102 1999/05/31 RUN DATE a 06/03/99 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE : 14.25.24 PAR VALUE TIR AT CURRENT QUALI" MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YLBLD RATING PRICE. NARRET VALUE \ TOTAL 850,000.00 PBILLIP ROMIG CO INC WE 5.25E 3.029 A2 100.656 863:353.00 9.16 3181548Y4 3.125\ 12/01/1999 DD 12/O1/92 955,576.00 4.56 900,000.00 GENERAL. NEES ACCBP CORP NEW 5.305 6.219 A2 100.496 909,657.00 9.68 3704211302 6.2501 O1/11/2000 OD O1/11154 904,464.00 4.82 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN O48 INC HIS 5.363 3.581 A2 100.574 303,930.00 3.23 033902AP3 7.625\ 09/15/1999 DD 09/21/99 301:322.00 1.61 150,000.00 CITICORP SUS CAP NT 5.264 9.682 Al 100.706 15I,663.50 1.61 173034D09 9.3501 08/01/1999 I51.059.00 .80 900,000.00 I.QUG ISLAND LTD CO DEB 5.419 3.292 PAA3 100.249 905,302.00 9.66 542631CR6 3.3001 07/15/1999 DD 07/21/92 902,241.00 4.80 500,000.00 TRANSANERICA PIN NTN #SBOOIIO 5.653 0.313 A3 101.646 515r125.00 5.44 8935ONEP1 8.4501 01/12/20GO ON O1/12/95 508.230.00 2.71 TOTAL TIEED INCOME SECURITIES 4.229 5.919 9,387,544.10 100.00 9,335,661.00 49.72 TOTAL 4.394 3.492 18.831.935.29 100.00 18,339,652.19 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 MSM7522202 1999/05/31 RUN DATE 06/03/99 DISTRICTS LOHC-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 273,576.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HCHT .000 4.602 AAA 100.000 273,576.71 3.59 996085247 273,576.71 .09 400,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 4.398 .COD P-1 99.413 397.660.00 5.21 74271ST34 06/18/1999 393.668.00 .12 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 4.921 .000 P-1 99.593 1,394,026.67 18.29 02815KTN5 06/22/1999 1,394,026.67 .44 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 4.823 .000 P-1 99.321 893,092.75 11.33 39142MBO 06/11/1999 893,892.75 .28 1.000,000.00 FORD MISS CR CO DISC 4.840 .000 P-1 98.752 987,510.88 12.96 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 989.519.88 .31 800,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 4.943 .000 P-1 99.519 796.144.OD 10.44 07815KTQS 06/24/1999 796,144.00 .25 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 4.843 .000 P-1 99.020 293.090.00 3.89 26354BT44 06/04/1999 293.080.00 .09 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.854 .000 99.904 893.338.00 11.33 01591SW6 06/16/1999 097.338.00 .28 1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 4.068 .000 P-1 99.023 1,283.293.94 16.89 63343DTB7 06/11/1999 1,287,293.94 .40 400,000.00 IBM DISC 4.039 .000 P-1 90.782 395,126.44 5.19 45920ETR2 06/25/1999 395,126.44 .12 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.505 .311 3.619.665.39 100.00 7,619,665.39 2.3B PIKED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT .ODD 5.035 Al 99.320 1.992.BDO.00 .63 0663651314 PLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/99 1,996,400.00 .62 3.500.000.00 CHRYSLER PIN HTN .ODD 5.032 Al 99.906 3r490,635.DO 1.12 171200980 FLTG RT 00/00/2002 DD 04/09/99 3,496.310.00 1.10 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 4 MSP07522202 1999/05/31 RUN DATE t 06/03/99 DISTRICTi TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME i 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARRRT VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 2,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO YEAH ENHANCED .000 5.115 Al 99.381 1,998,613.60 .64 3453938C0 FLTU RT 08/27/2006 DO 09/27/98 1,995,620.00 .63 3,950,000.00 GENERAL RTRS ACCEP CORD NTS .000 5.537 A2 99.452 3,918,768.50 1.26 330425OV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DD 09/17/99 3,928,354.00 1.23 4,000,000.00 GELLER FINL ]WIN .000 5.227 A3 100.250 4,000,000.00 1.29 42333NSN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DD 04/07/90 4,010,000.00 1.26 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTH 4TR 00246 .000 5.246 A3 100.210 3.000,000.00 .96 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/27/99 3,006,300.00 .94 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO NTH .000 5.966 AT 99.690 4,000,000.00 1.28 44181KZAS FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,987,600.00 1.25 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400530 .000 5.353 AZ 99.770 999,180.90 .32 44181EET4 FLTG RT 00/01/2001 DD 09/04/98 997,700.00 .31 4,041,736.17 STUDENT LN HEM ASSN 1997-1 Al .000 5.346 AAA 99.470 3,995,792.99 1.29 30442GAX2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,020,314.97 1.26 7,211,050.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.699 3.620 AAA 99.906 7,107,093.73 2.32 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,204,271.61 2.26 10,413,300.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.323 3.485 AAA 96.844 10,134,275.00 3.24 912B232M3 3.3351 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 10,OB4,656.25 3.13 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 6.146 AAA 101.687 9,034,223.67 2.38 9128272GS 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 0,643,395.00 2.32 29,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG AMR HTN 4.943 6.523 AM, 102.250 20,012,510.00 6.25 31364CEY3 6.6701 03/27/2002 DD 03/27/97 19,427,500.00 6.11 7,000,000.00 NORGAN STANLEY NTS ETR 00299 5.170 5.142 AA3 100.031 6,996,129.00 2.25 617452MI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DD 04/15/99 7,002,170.00 2.20 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.209 AAA 119.766 6,233,593.75 1.92 912030DE5 11.1251 08/15/2003 00 07/05/83 5,988,300.00 1.88 31,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.258 ARA 101.075 32,509,217.31 10.33 912827E54 06.3751 09/30/2002 DO 09/30/96 32,090,625.00 10.09 17,100,000.00 U s TREASURY NOTES; 5.366 7.179 AAA 104.469 10,369,604.02 5.75 '912B27D25 07.5001 11/15/2001 DO ll/15/91 17,064,199.00 5.62 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 5 OCSF07522202 1999/05/31 RUN DATE : 06/03/99 DTSTRICTI WNG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALIT MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE. SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 5.500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.402 6.139 AAA 101.812 5,677.682.23 1.80 9128273GS 06.250% 00/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 5,599,660.00 1.76 14,700,000.00 V S TREASURY NOTES 5.456 5.535 AAA 99.359 14,722,617.19 4.30 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/99 14,605.733.00 4.51 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.613 9.603 AAA 123.656 6,698.250.00 2.07 912910MO 11.875% 11/25/2003 DO 10/05/83 1,430,112.00 2.02 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.466 AA 100.533 1,543,215.00 .48 046003HY0 6.5001 03/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,502.995.00 .42 730,000.00 CONNIT TO PUS FNMA 11" 5.342 5.793 AAA 99.594 725,093.75 .23 IIF0I1637 VAR RT 07/01/2029 727,036.20 .23 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.812 A3 90.933 999.730.00 .31 42333HKYO 5.350% 09/25/2001 AD 09/25/98 989.330.00 .31 16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.303 6.344 AAA 102.453 16,581,067.03 5.31 9128232W1 06.500% 05/31/2D02 DD 06/02/97 16,494,933.00 5.18 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTS 5.804 6.551 A2 99.028 2.060.339.DO .64 8124000W6 6.5401 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 2,001,551.40 .63 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.143 AAA I01.750 5,086,402.25 1.63 9128232L5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 5.083.500.DO 1.60 3,000.DOO.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HTN 5.849 6.616 A2 100.218 3.003,17D.00 .96 81240OUA1 6.6301 07/09/2002 OD 07/09/97 3,006,54D.00 .95 14.350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL BIG ASSH NTH 5.892 6.033 AAA 94.641 14,560,462.50 4.49 31364GLD9 5.710% 12/15/2008 DD 12/15/96 13,959,547.50 4.39 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANE CHARWPIE N C HIS 5.882 5.056 AA1 99.906 5,996,400.00 1.93 63858]DE6 5.9501 04/07/2000 DD 04/07/98 5,994,360.00 1.08 090,576.40 PHLNC NULTICL RIG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.893 100.125 989,324.02 .29 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 891,689.62 .28 1,018,574.40 CHASE HANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.953 5.895 AAA 100.087 1,016,465.72 .32 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 to OI9,460.64 .32 2,500,000.00 HIRRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.350 AA3 100.398 2,526,725.00 .80 59018SAP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 2,509,950.00 .39 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 6 OCSF07522202 1999/05/31 RUN DATE 1 06/03/99 DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 1 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY RABBET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MEET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTR TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.025 AAA 99.502 7,497,255.00 2.40 039667AX5 6.000% 06/25/2002 DD 06/15/99 1,468t650.00 2.35 .2,250,000.00 GENERAL HTR6 ACCEP CORP NTS 6.032 6.994 A2 101.075 1t283t862.50 .41 370425QFO 3.125% 05/01/2001 DD 05/01/97 1,273,437.50 .40 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HTH 6.046 6.632 A2 101.031 1,018,520.00 .32 33042MGE1 6.7001 04/30/2001 DD 04/25/96 I.OI0t3IO.00 .32 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUS GNHA BF MTG 6.102 6.663 AAA 93.543 10,329,375.00 3.29 OIN062664 6.5001 06/15/2029 10,242,435.00 3.22 2.000.D00.00 BAUNBOSTON CORP 6R NTS 6.133 6.164 A2 99.366 1.999.600.00 .64 06605TAL6 6.1251 03/l5/2002 DO 03/12/99 1,987,320.00 .62 153.295.94 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.178 AAA 100.363 153.295.93 .05 316]]EAA4 6.2000 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 IS7.861.50 .05 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 6.201 6.252 A3 99.172 1,000,000.00 .31 73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 991.720.OD .31 2,500,000.00 LIME E BROS ELDON MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.336 BAAI 100.371 2.509.135.OD .00 52517PLH1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 2,509,275.00 .79 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNHA SF MTG 6.291 6.330 IAA 94.781 6,011,718.75 1.90 OIN060668 6.000% 06/15/2029 5,923,812.50 1.06 4.500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL PTO ASSN NTN 6.291 6.163 AAA 101.094 4.480.3D5.00 1.46 31364CAV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,549,230.00 1.43 3,690.633.18 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 5.971 AAA 100.782 3,694,910.05 1.19 3133ME95 6.324% 08/15/2032 3.319.735.01 1.17 2,000.000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.342 A2 100.122 2.031,960.00 .64 073902ANI 6.7501 04/IE/2003 2,002,440.00 .63 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.632 BAA1 100.265 5,039r450.00 1.61 52517PJD4 6.650% 11/0812000 DD 11/08/96 5,013,250.00 1.58 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 9R NTS 6.425 6.002 A2 100.716 1,317.619.35 .42 003902AWB 6.750% 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1,314,343.80 .41 2.000,000.00 FHLMC HULTICLIISS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.538 ARA 99.421 2,000,888.00 .64 3133TDPV2 6.5002 09/25/2018 1,908,420.00 .63 YLUANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1999/05/31 RUN DATE t 06/03/99 DISTRICTt TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.25.24 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MAMXET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARRET VALUE I TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,293,210.93 FNLMC MULTICIASS CTF REM 1620E 6.554 6.502 AAA 92.281 2,137,070.99 .68 3133T13A4 6.0001 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 2,116,197.99 .63 0,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL NED ASSN MTN 6.577 6.528 AAA 101.641 0,012,576.00 2.61 31364CB69 6.625% 04/10/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,131,280.00 2.56 9,000,000.00 PMILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 9.037 A2 102.360 9,903.280.00 2.96 218154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 9,212,400.00 2.90 10,814,512.04 FNLNC GROUP IGS-0426 6.629 6.932 AAA 100.975 10,983,488.79 3.51 312BOWSS 3.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/90 10,919,953.53 3.43 3.000.D00.00 G N A C NED TERM NTS 6.660 8.471 A2 101.742 3,227,070.00 .98 37042RRQ4 8.6251 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,052,260.00 .96 2,615,836.60 GNMA 11 POOL IOOOO88H 6.205 6.291 AAA 101.234 2,673,058.23 .85 36225CC20 6.8351 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 2,648,116.23 .93 1,843,053.70 GNMA 1I POOL IOOROD23 6.869 6.850 AAA 102.108 1,873,579.28 .60 36225CAX9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 1,803,379.71 .59 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.628 AAA 153.562 4,029,030.31 1.23 912810D34 13.250% 05/15/2014 DD 05/15/84 3,839,050.00 1.21 2,000,000.00 TANG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 2.512 0.189 BAA3 100.135 2,151,250.00 .64 54267ICT2 0.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 2.002.20D.00 .63 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.550 6.123 315,430,307.38 100.00 310,517,138.83 92.60 TOTAL 4.550 6.100 323,049,972.32 100.00 318,236,804.22 100.00 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES ARPIL O6-MAY-1999 -1.70 -1.70 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- -1.70 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES APRIL 06-MAY-1999 -10.20 -10.20 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- -10.20 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 25-MAY-1999 -897,338.00 -897,338.00 99.704222 02581STG6 06/16/1999 25-MAY-1999 897,338.00 897,338.00 99.704222 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-HAY-1999 -897,338.00 -897,338.00 99.704222 02581STG6 06/16/1999 25-MAY-1999 -897,330.00 0.00 99.704222 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-KAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 21-MAY-1999 -1,394,026,67 -1,394,026.67 99.573334 07815KTNS 06/22/1999 21-MAY-1999 1,394,026.67 1,394,026.67 99.573334 B FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 21-MAY-1999 -1,394,026.67 -1,394,026.67 99.573334 07815KTN5 06/22/1999 21-MAY-1999 -1,394,026.67 0.00 99.573334 FC FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, 21-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 19-MAY-1999 -2,189,396.00 -2,189,396.00 99.518000 07815KTQS 06/24/1999 19-MAY-1999 2,189,396.00 2,189,396.00 99.518000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 1 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 2,200,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 19-MAY-1999 -2,189,396.00 -2,189,396.00 99.518000 07815KT08 06/24/1999 19-MAY-1999 -2,189,396.00 0.00 99.518000 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGS1), 19-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 04-MAY-1999 -2,440,218.06 -2,440,218.06 97.608722 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 04-MAY-1999 2,440,218.06 2,440,218.06 97.608722 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00000000D 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 04-MAY-1999 -2,440,218.06 -2,440,218.06 97.608722 313396NT6 MAT 11/02/1999 04-MAY-1999 -2,440,218.06 0.00 97.608722 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 25-MAY-1999 -889,080.00 -889,080.00 98.786666 313588KV6 MAT 08/24/1999 25-MAY-1999 889,080.00 889,080.00 98.786666 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 25-MAY-1999 -889,080.00 -889,090.00 98.786666 313588KV6 MAT 08/24/1999 25-MAY-1999 -889,080.00 0.00 98.786666 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 04-MAY-1999 -878,069.00 -878,069.00 97.563222 38142UY30 11/03/1999 05-MAY-1999 878,069.00 878,069.00 97.563222 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 04-MAY-1999 -878,069.00 -878,069.00 97.563222 38142UY30 11/03/1999 05-MAY-1999 -878,069.00 0.00 97.563222 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 05-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 05-MAY-1999 -397,668.00 -397,668.00 99.417000 74271STJ4 06/18/1999 05-MAY-1999 397,668.00 397,668.00 99.417000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 05-MAY-1999 -397,668.00 -397,668.00 99.417000 74271STJ4 06/18/1999 05-MAY-1999 -397,668.00 0.00 99.417000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 05-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 US TREASURY BILLS 14-MAY-1999 -3,350,799.17 -3,350,799.17 98.552916 912795CN9 09/09/1999 DD 03/11/99 17-MAY-1999 3,350,799.17 3,350,199.17 98.552916 0 GOLDMAN SACHS 5 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 US TREASURY BILLS 14-MAY-1999 -3,350,799.17 -3,350,799.17 98.552916 912795CN9 09/09/1999 DO 03/11/99 17-HAY-1999 -3,350,799.17 0.00 98.552916 PC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-MAY-1999 -400,000.00 -400,000.00 300.000000 99358V390 04.780% 05/05/1999 DD 05/04/99 04-MAY-1999 400,000.00 400,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-MAY-1999 -400,000.00 -400,000.00 100.000000 99358V390 04.780% 05/05/1999 DO 05/04/99 04-MAY-1999 -400,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,416.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 -20,416.83 -20,416.83 1.000000 996085247 03-MAY-1999 20,416.83 20,416.83 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,416.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 -20,416.83 -20,416.83 1.000000 996085247 03-MAY-1999 -20,416.83 0.00 1.000000 PC 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,781.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-MAY-1999 -9.781.94 -9,781.94 1.000000 996085247 04-MAY-1999 9,781.94 9,781.94 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,781.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-MAY-1999 -9,781.94 -9,781.94 1.000000 996095247 04-MAY-1999 -9,781.94 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 21,931.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-MAY-1999 -21,931.00 -21,931.00 1.000000 996085247 05-MAY-1999 21,931.00 21,931.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 21,931.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-MAY-1999 -21,931.00 -21,931.00 1.000000 996085247 DS-MAY-1999 -21,931.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 05-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,385.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-MAY-1999 -2,385.11 -2,385.11 1.000000 9960B5247 05-MAY-1999 2,385.11 2,385.11 1.000000 a ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,385.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-MAY-1999 -2,385.11 -2,385.11 1.000000 996085247 05-MAY-1999 -2,385.11 0.00 1.000000 PC 05-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,216.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-MAY-1999 25,216.67 -25,216.67 1.000000 996085247 11-MAY-1999 25,216.67 25,216.67 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,216.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-MAY-1999 -25,216.67 -25,216.67 1.000000 996085247 11-MAY-1999 -25,216.67 0.00 1.000000 PC 11-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 84,096.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-MAY-1999 -84,096.87 -84,096.87 1.000000 996085247 14-MAY-1999 84,O96.B7 84,096.87 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 MELLON TRUST .. .. ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 84,096.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-MAY-1999 -84,096.87 -84,096.87 1.000000 996095247 14-14AY-1999 -84,096.87 0.00 1.000000 FC 14-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 54,388.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-MAY-1999 -54,388.33 -54,388.33 1.000000 996085247 17-MAY-1999 54,388.33 54,388.33 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 54,308.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-MAY-1999 -54,388.33 -54,388.33 1.000000 996085247 17-MAY-1999 -54,388.33 0.00 1.000000 PC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,427,235.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-MAY-1999 -2,427,235.32 -2,427,235.32 1.000000 996085247 is-MAY-1999 2,427,235.32 2,427,235.32 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,427,235.32 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-MAY-1999 -2,427,235.32 -2,427,235.32 1.000000 996085247 18-MAY-1999 -2,427,235.32 0.00 1.000000 FC 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 201,249.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-MAY-1999 -201,249.77 -201,249.77 1.000000 996085247 20-MAY-1999 202,249.77 201,249.77 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 201,249.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 20-MAY-1999 -201,249.77 -201,249.77 1.000000 996065247 20-MAY-2999 -201,249.77 0.00 1.000000 PC 20-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10*920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-MAY-1999 -10,920.00 -10,920.00 1.000000 996085247 25-MAY-1999 10,920.00 10,920.00. 1.000000 Page 5 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-MAY-1999 -10,920,00 -10,920.00 1.000000 996085247 25-MAY-1999 -10,920.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,657.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-MAY-1999 -5,657.44 5,657.44 1.000000 996085247 25-MAY-2999 5,657.44 5,657.44 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,657.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-MAY-1999 -5,657.44 -5,657.44 1.000000 996085247 25-MAY-1999 -5,657.44 0.00 1.000000 FC 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,592.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-MAY-1999 -3,592.06 -3,592.06 1.000000 996085247 26-MAY-1999 3,592.06 3,592.06 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,592.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-MAY-1999 -3,592.06 -3,592.06 1.000000 996085247 26-MAY-1999 -3,592.06 0.00 1.000000 FC 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,518.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-MAY-1999 -25,518.75 -25,518.75 1.000000 996085247 27-MAY-1999 25,518.75 25,518.75 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,518.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-MAY-1999 -25,518.75 -25,518.75 1.000000 996085247 27-MAY-1999 -25,518.75 0.00 1.000000 FC 27-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,377,420.68 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-MAY-1999 -2,377,420.68 -2,377,420.68 1.000000 Page 6 MELLON TRUST , ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996087094 VAR RT DD O6/26/1997 17-MAY-1999 2,377,420.68 2,377,420.68 1.000000 B 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-MAR-1999 -6,009,765.63 -6,009,765.63 96.156250 OIN060643 6.000% 04/15/2029 22-APR-1999 -6,009,765.63 0.00 96.156250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 22-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 14-APR-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 97.532250 O1N060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -6,095,703.13 0.00 97.531250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 14-APR-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 97.531250 O1N060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 6,095,703.13 6,095,703.13 97.531250 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 14-APR-1999 6,095,703.13 6,095,703.13 97.531250 0IN060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 97.531250 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-MAY-1999 -6,011,718.75 -6,011,718.75 96.187500 OIN060668 6.0001 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 6,011,718.75 6,011,718.75 96.187500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ---------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GHMA SF MTG 25-FEB-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 9B.906250 OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -10,385,156.25 0.00 98.906250 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 24-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 25-FEB-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,395,156.25 98.906250 O1N062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 10,385,156.25 10,385,156.25 98.906250 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS RASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 25-FEB-1999 10,385,156.25 10,385,156.25 98.906250 O1N062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 98.906250 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 -10,329,375.00 -10,329,375.00 9B.375000 OIN062664 6.500% 06/15/2029 23-JUN-1999 10,329,375.00 10,329,375.00 98.375000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-MAR-1999 2,005,625.00 2,005,625.00 100.281250 11F011644 5.940% 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 -2,005,625.00 -2,005,625.00 100.281250 BC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-MAR-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 11F011644 5.940% 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 -2,236,968.75 0.00 100.312500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 1IF011651 5.812% 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500 PC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,012,500.00 -2,012,500.00 100.625000 1IF011651 5.812% 05/25/2029 25-14AY-1999 -2,012,500.00 0.00 100.625000 FC GOLDMAN SACKS 6 CO, NY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,012,500.00 -2,012,500.00 100.625000 11F011651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,012,500.00 2,012,500.00 100.625000 B GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,012,500.00 2,012,500.00 100.625000 11F011651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,012,500.00 -2,012,500.00 100.625000 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -2,008,750.00 -2,008,750.00 100.437500 11F011669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,008,750.00 2,008,750.00 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 2,008,750.00 2,008,750.00 100.437500 1IF011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,008,750.00 -2,009,750.00 100.437500 BC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 1IF011669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 BC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNHA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -2,008,750.00 -2,000,750.00 100.437500 IIF0I1669 VAR RT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,008,750.00 2,000,750.00 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE EASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,270,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -1,275,556.25 -1,275,556.25 100.437500 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 1,275,556.25 1,275,556.25 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 11-MAY-1999 -733,193.75 -733,293.75 100.437500 11F011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 733,193.75 733,293.75 100.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH 28-MAY-1999 -725,893.75 -725,893.75 99.437500 1IF011677 VAR RT 07/01/2029 26-JUL-1999 725,893.75 725,893.75 99.437500 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEBS 12-MAY-1999 -999,200.00 -999,200.00 99.920000 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/18/99 18-MAY-1999 999,200.00 999,200.00 99.920000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 12-MAY-1999 999,200.00 999,200.00 99.920000 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/18/99 18-MAY-1999 -999,200.00 -999,200.00 99.920000 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEBS 12-MAY-1999 -999,200.00 -999,200.00 99.920000 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/18/99 18-MAY-1999 999,200.00 999,200.00 99.920000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEBS 12-MAY-1999 -999,200.00 -999,200.00 99.920000 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/18/99 18-14AY-1999 -999,200.00 0.00 99.920000 PC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 91,102.46 91,102.46 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.281250 Page 10 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ BC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,946.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 386.86 386.86 100.281250 31360YK52 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.201250 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 91,102.46 91,102.46 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.281250 BC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL 00020105 12-14AR-1999 370.01 370.01 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90f846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 91,472.47 91,472.47 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.0724 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 91,472.47 0.00 100.281250 FCC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 91,102.46 91,302.46 - 100.281250 B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,846.95 FNMA POOL 00020105 12-MAR-1999 -370.01 -370.01 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.0721 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -91,472.47 -91,472.47 100.281250 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,472.47 0.00 100.281250 FC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 2,151,250.00 2,151,250.00 107.562500 Page 11 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 -2,151,250.00 -2,151,250.00 107.562500 BC BNY CAPITAL MARKETS INC, NEW Y ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00DD00000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 21,866.67 21,866.67 107.562500 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 107.562500 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 -2,151,250.00 -2,151,250.00 107.562500 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 2,151,250.00 2,151,250.00 107.562500 B BNY CAPITAL MARKETS INC, NEW Y ----------- D.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 -21,866.67 -21,866.67 107.562500 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 107.562500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 -2,173,116.67 -2,173,116.67 107.562500 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 -2,173,116.67 0.00 107.562500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 -8,529,882.81 -8,529,982.81 100.351562 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DD 05/31/98 14-MAY-1999 8,529,882.81 8,529,882.81 100.351562 B BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 -211,916.21 -211,916.21 100.351562 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 14-MAY-2999 0.00 0.00 100.351562 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 -8,741,799.02 -8,741,799.02 100.351562 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 14-MAY-1999 -8,741,799.02 0.00 100.351562 FC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 14-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 12 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 6,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 -6,192,734.38 -6,192,734.38 99.882813 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/31/98 26-MAY-1999 6,192,734.38 6,192,734.38 99.882813 B DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, NEW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 -165,815.94 -165,815.94 99.882813 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DD 05/31/98 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.882813 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 -6,358,550.32 -6,358,550.32 99.882813 9128274H2 05.500% 05/31/2003 DO 05/32/98 26-14AY-1999 -6,358,550.32 0.00 99.082813 PC DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, NEW 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 -4,992,368.95 -4,992,368.85 99.847377 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-MAY-1999 4,992,368.85 4,992,368.85 99.847377 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 -1,426.63 -1,426.63 99.847377 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.847377 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-14AY-1999 4,992,368.85 4,992,368.85 99.847377 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-MAY-1999 -4,992,368.85 -4,992,368.85 99.047377 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 1,426.63 1,426.63 99.847377 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.847377 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 -4,992,350.00 -4,992,350.00 99.847000 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-14AY-1999 4,992,350.00 4,992,350.00 99.847000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 -1,426.63 -1,426.63 99.847000 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.847000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-MAY-1999 -4,993,776.63 -4,993,776.63 99.847000 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 17-MAY-1999 -4,993,776.63 0.00 99.847000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAY-1999 -12.50 -12.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 12.50 12.50 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 O.DO 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAY-1999 -12.50 -12.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 -12.50 0.00 100.000000 PC 27-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,408.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-MAY-1999 -11,408.92 -11,408.92 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-MAY-1999 11,408.92 11,408.92 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,408.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-MAY-1999 -11,408.92 -11,408.92 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-MAY-1999 -11,408.92 0.00 100.000000 PC 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -30,900.00 -30,900.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 30,900.00 30,900.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -30,900.00 -30,900.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.3751 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -30,900.00 0.00 100.000000 Page 14 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,420.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -21,420.00 -21,420.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 21,420.00 21,420.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,420.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 15-JAN-1999 -21,420.00 -21,420.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -21,420.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 29-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 26-MAY-1999 1,393,252.00 1,393,252.00 99.518000 07815KT09 06/24/1999 26-MAY-1999 -1,393,252.00 -1,393,252.00 99.518000 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 26-MAY-1999 1,278.28 1,278.26 99.518000 07815KTOO 06/24/1999 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.518000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 26-MAY-1999 1,394,530.28 1,394,530.28 99.518000 07815KTOB 06/24/1999 26-MAY-1999 1,394,530.2E 0.00 99.518000 FC GOLD14AN SACHS a CO, NY 26-MAY-1999 0.00 - 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 18-MAY-1999 494,151.67 494,251.67 98.830334 313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 18-MAY-1999 -494,151.67 -494,151.67 98.830334 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 18-MAY-1999 5,386.52 5,386.52 98.830334 313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 98.830334 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 18-MAY-1999 499,538.19 499,538.19 98.830334 313588GA7 HAT 05/25/1999 18-MAY-1999 499,538.19 0.00 99.930334 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 03-MAY-1999 1,580,030.22 1,580,030.22 98.751888 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 03-MAY-1999 -1,590,030.21 -1,500,030.21 98.751888 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.01 0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 03-MAY-1999 1,900.45 1,900.45 98.751888 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 03-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 98.751888 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 03-MAY-1999 1,581,930.67 1,581,930.67 98.751888 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 03-MAY-1999 1,581,930.67 0.00 98.751888 PC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI( , 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 17-MAY-1999 4,740,090.67 4,740,090.67 98.751888 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 17-MAY-1999 -4,740,090.62 -4,740,090.62 98.751888 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.05 0.05 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 17-HAY-1999 14,549.33 14,549.33 98.751888 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 17-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 98.751888 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,800,000.00 FORD MTR CH. CO DISC 17-MAY-1999 4,754,640.00 4,754,640.00 98.751989 34539UUS9 07/26/1999 17-MAY-1999 4,754,640.00 0.00 98.751988 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-MAY-1999 400,000.00 400,000.00 100.000000 99350V390 04,780% 05/05/1999 DO 05/04/99 05-MAY-1999 -400,000.00 -400,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 16 MGLLUN '1'HUS'1' ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-MAY-1999 53.11 53.11 100.000000 9935OV390 04.780% 05/05/1999 DO 05/04/99 05-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 100.000000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-MAY-1999 400,053.11 400,053.11 100.000000 9935BV390 04.780% 05/05/1999 DO 05/04/99 05-MAY-1999 400,053.11 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 05-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -499,292.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 499,292.17 499,292.17 1.000000 996085247 03-MAY-1999 -499,292.17 -499,292.17 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -499,292.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 499,292.17 499,292.17 1.000000 996085247 03-MAY-1999 499,292.17 0.00 1.000000 PC 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -387,058.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-MAY-1999 387,058.56 387,058.56 1.000000 996085247 04-MAY-1999 -387,058.56 -397,058.56 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -387,058.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-14AY-1999 387,058.56 387,058.56 1.000000 996085247 04-MAY-1999 387,058.56 0.00 1.000000 FC 04-MAY-2999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-MAY-1999 1.70 1.70 1.000000 996085247 07-MAY-1999 -1.70 -1.70 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-MAY-1999 1.70 1.70 1.000000 996085247 07-MAY-1999 1.70 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 17 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-MAY-1999 10.20 10.20 1.000000 996085247 07-MAY-1999 -10.20 -10.20 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-MAY-1999 10.20 10.20 1.000000 996085247 07-MAY-1999 10.20 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -284,749.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-MAY-1999 284,749.31 284,749.31 1.00OOOD 996085247 17-MAY-1999 -284,749.31 -284,749.31 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -284,749.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-MAY-1999 284,749.31 284,749.31 1.000000 996085247 17-MAY-1999 284,749.31 0.00 1.000000 FC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,661.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-MAY-1999 99,661.81 99,661.81 1.000000 996085247 18-MAY-1999 -99,661.81 -99,661.81 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,661.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-MAY-1999 99,661.81 99,661.81 1.000000 996085247 18-MAY-1999 99,661.81 0.00 1.000000 FC 19-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,175,601.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-MAY-1999 2,175,601.13 2,175,601.13 1.000000 996085247 19-MAY-1999 -2,175,601.13 -2,175,601.13 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,175,601.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-MAY-1999 2,175,601.13 2,175,601.13 1.000000 996085247 19-MAY-1999 2,175,601.13 0.00 1.000000 Page 28 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ____-----___---___ FC 19-NAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,026.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-MAY-1999 94,026.67 94,026.67 1.000000 996085247 21-MAY-1999 -94,026.67 -94,026.67 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,026.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-MAY-1999 94,026.67 94,026.67 1.000000 996085247 21-MAY-1999 94,026.67 0.00 1.000000 FC 21-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -120,048.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-MAY-1999 120,048.83 120,048.83 1.000000 996085247 24-MAY-1999 -120,049.83 -120,048.83 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -120,048.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-MAY-1999 120,048.83 120,048.83 1.000000 996085247 24-MAY-1999 120,048.83 0.00 1.000000 FC 24-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,377,420.68 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-MAY-1999 2,377,420.68 2,377,420.68 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 18-MAY-1999 -2,377,420.68 -2,377,420.68 1.000000 S 18-MAY-1999 0.00 '0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 6,102,294.93 6,102,294.93 97.636700 OIN060643 6.000% 04/15/2029 22-APR-1999 -6,009,765.63 -6,009,765.63 97.636700 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 92,529.30 92,529.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 6,102,294.93 6,102,294.93 97.636700 01N060643 6.000% 04/15/2029 22-APR-1999 6,102,294.93 0.00 97.636700 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 22-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 19 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 07-MAY-1999 6,018,310.55 6,018,310.55 96.292968 O1HO60650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 96.292968 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -77,392.58 -77,392.58 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 07-MAY-1999 -6,018,310.55 -6,018,310.55 96.292968 OIN060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 6,095,703.13 6,095,703.13 96.292960 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 77,392.58 77,392.58 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 07-MAY-1999 6,018,310.55 6,010,310.55 96.292968 O1HO60650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 96.292969 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -77,392.58 -77,392.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 07-MAY-1999 6,018,310.55 6,018,310.55 96.292968 OIN060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 6,018,310.55 0.00 96.292968 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 24-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-14AY-1999 10,342,500.00 10,342,500.00 98.500000 O1N062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 98.500000 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -42,656.25 -42,656.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 -10,342,500.00 -10,342,500.00 98.500000 O1N062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 10,385,156.25 10,385,156.25 99.500000 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 42,656.25 42,656.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 10,342,500.00 10,342,500.00 98.500000 01NO62656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 98.500000 S SALOMON BROS INC, MEN YORK ----------- -42,656.25 -42,656.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-MAY-1999 10,342,500.00 10,342,500.00 98.500000 OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 10,342,500.00 0.00 98.500000 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 24-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,243,676.17 -2,243,676.17 100.613281 11FO11644 VAR RT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 2,236,639.26 2,236,639.26 100.613281 SC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY ----------- -7,036.91 -7,036.91 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,013,515.63 -2,013,515.63 100.675782 11FO11644 VAR RT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 2,005,954.49 2,005,954.49 100.675782 SC GOLDMAN SACKS a CO, NY ----------- -7,561.14 -7,561.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,243,676.17 2,243,676.17 100.613281 11FO11644 VAR RT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.613281 S BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY ----------- 6,707.42 6,707.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,243,676.17 2,243,676.17 100.613281 1IF011644 VAR AT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 2,243,676.17 0.00 100.613291 PC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-MAY-1999 2,237,752.73 2,237,752.73 100.347656 1IF011651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,243,202.73 -2,243,202.73 100.347656 S BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY ----------- -5,450.00 -5,450.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-MAY-1999 -2,237,752.73 -2,237,752.73 100.347656 IIFOI1651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,243,202.73 2,243,202.73 100.347656 SC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY ----------- 5,450.00 51450.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-MAY-1999 2,009,453.13 2,009,453.13 100.472656 21FO11651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,011,841.02 -2,011,641.02 100.472656 S GOLDMAN SACNS a CO, NY ----------- -2,387.89 -2,387.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-HAY-1999 -2,009,453.13 -2,009,453.13 100.472656 1IF011651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,011,841.02 2,011,841.02 100.472656 SC GOLDMAN SACNS a CO, NY ----------- 2,387.89 2,387.89 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-MAY-1999 2,237,752.73 2,237,752.73 100.347656 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,243,202.73 -2,243,202.73 100,347656 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -5,450.00 -5,450.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-HAY-1999 2,237,752.73 2,237,752.73 100.347656 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,237,752.73 0.00 100,347656 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-MAY-1999 2,009,453.13 2,009,453.13 100.472656 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 -2,011,841.02 -2,011,841.02 100.472656 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -2,387.89 -2,387.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG II-MAY-1999 2,009,453.13 2,009,453.13 100.472656 11F011651 VAR AT 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,009,453.13 0.00 100.472656 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-MAY-1999 O.DO 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,270,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 1,273,968.75 1,273,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -1,274,323.64 -1,274,323.64 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -354.89 -354.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 1IF011669 VAR AT 06/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,237,890.44 -2,237,890.44 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -921.69 -921.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 -2,236,968.75 -2,236,968.75 100.312500 1IF011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 2,237,890.44 2,237,890.44 100.312500 SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 921.69 921.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 14-MAY-1999 2,236,968.75 2,236,968.75 100.312500 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -2,238,584.83 -2,238,584.83 100.312500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -1,616.08 -1,616.08 1.000000000 Page 22 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -730,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH COFI 28-KAY-1999 726,378.52 726,378.52 99.503906 11F011669 VAR RT O6/25/2029 24-JUN-1999 -733,091.21 -733,091.21 99.503906 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -6,712.69 -6,712.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 -91,460.88 -91,460.88 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 91,102.46 91,102.46 100.675781 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -358.42 -358.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,946.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 -370.01 -370.01 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 90,946.95 FNMA POOL 00020105 14-APR-1999 -91,830.89 -91,830.89 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,830.89 0.00 100.675781 FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 91,460.88 91,460.88 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.675781 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 358.42 358.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 370.01 370.01 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781 i8 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 91,830.89 91,830.89 100.675781 31360YKS2 6.0721 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 91,030.89 0.00 100.675781 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 14-APR-1999 814,656.89 814,656.09 100.675781 313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DO 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 -811,464.39 -811,464.39 100.675761 Page 23 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 3,192.50 3,192.50 11000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 14-APR-1999 3,291.82 3,291.82 100.675781 313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DD 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 14-APR-1999 817,948.71 817,948.71 100.675781 313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DO 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 817,948.71 0.00 100.675781 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -366,757.31 FNMA POOL #0062938 14-APR-1999 369,235.79 369,235.79 100.675781 31362J4X0 5.839% 03/01/2027 DO O6/01/88 26-APR-1999 -367,788.81 -367,788.81 100.675781 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 1,446.98 1,446.98 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -366,757.31 FNMA POOL #0062938 14-APR-1999 1,491.99 1,491.99 100.675781 31362J4X0 5.839% 03/01/2027 DO O6/01/88 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -366,757.31 FNMA POOL 00062938 14-APR-1999 37D,727.78 370,727.78 100.675781 31362J4X0 5.839% 03/01/2027 DO O6/01/89 26-APR-1999 370,727.78 0.00 100.675781 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -514,435.31 FNMA POOL #0190012 14-APR-1999 520,004.52 520,004.52 100.675781 31368HAM5 VAR AT 11/01/2027 DO 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 520,004.52 0.00 100.675781 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 8,804,472.66 8,804,472.66 103.582031 9128272SO 06.6251 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 14-MAY-1999 -8,865,156.26 -8,865,156.26 103.582031 S BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- -60,683.60 -60,683.60 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 21,423.23 21,423.23 103.582031 Page 24 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-14AY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 912827250 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 14-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 103.582031 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAY-1999 8,825,895.89 8,825,895.89 103.582031 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 14-MAY-1999 8,825,895.89 0.00 103.582031 FC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 14-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 4,959,765.63 4,959,765.63 99.195313 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 26-MAY-1999 -4,992,350.00 -4,992,350.00 99.195313 S DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, NEW ----------- -32,584.37 -32,584.37 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 7,846.47 7,846.47 99.195313 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 99.195313 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MAY-1999 4,967,612.10 4,967,612.10 99.195313 9128275F5 05.250% 05/15/2004 DO 05/15/99 26-MAY-1999 4,967,612.10 0.00 99.195313 FC DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, NEW 26-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -125,510.67 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-MAY-1999 125,510.67 125,510.67 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAY-1999 -125,250.83 -125,250.83 100.000000 PD ----------- 259.84 259.84 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -125,510.67 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-MAY-1999 125,510.67 125,510.67 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAY-1999 125,510.67 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -781,146.66 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-MAY-1999 781,146.66 781,146.66 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-MAY-1999 -793,352.08 -793,352.08 100.000000 PD ----------- -12,205.42 -12,205.42 1.000000000 0.00 Page 25 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -781,146.66 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-MAY-1999 781,146.66 781,146.66 100.000000 3128DD055 7.DD04 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-MAY-1999 781,146.66 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 83,351.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 -83,351.50 -83,351.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 83,442.67 83,442.67 100.000000 PDC ----------- 91.17 91.17 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 24.00 24.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -24.03 -24.03 100.000000 PD ----------- -0.03 -0.03 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 -24.00 -24.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% O8/15/2032 01-APR-1999 24.03 24.03 100.000000 PDC ----------- 0.03 0.03 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 83,364.00 83,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -83,455.18 -83,455.18 100.000000 PD ----------- -91.18 -91.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -83,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 83,364.00 83,364.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 83,364.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -80,370.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAY-1999 80,370.50 80,370.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAY-1999 -80,458.40 -80,458.40 100.000000 PD ----------- -87.90 -87.90 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,668.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-MAY-1999 45,668.70 45,668.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-MAY-1999 -45,604.48 -45,604.48 100.000000 PD ----------- 64.22 64.22 1.000000000 Page 26 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,668.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-MAY-1999 -45,668.70 -45,668.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.9001 06/15/2017 01-MAY-1999 45,604.48 45,604.48 100.000000 PDC ----------- -64.22 -64.22 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,668.70 FHLMC HULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-MAY-1999 45,668.70 45,668.70 100.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-MAY-1999 -45,604.48 -45,604.48 100.000000 PD ----------- 64.22 64.22 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,668.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-MAY-1999 45,668.70 45,668.70 100.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-MAY-1999 45,668.70 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,584.26 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-MAY-1999 16,584.26 16,584.26 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-MAY-1999 -16,584.26 -16,584.26 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,584.26 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-MAY-1999 16,584.26 16,584.26 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-MAY-1999 16,584.26 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,476.40 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAY-1999 61,476.40 61,476.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAY-1999 -62,494.60 -62,494.60 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,018.20 -1,018.20 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61,476.40 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-MAY-1999 -61,476.40 -61,476.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAY-1999 62,494.60 62,494.60 100.000000 PDC ----------- 1,018.20 1,018.20 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,478.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAY-1999 61,478.65 61,478.65 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAY-1999 -62,496.89 -62,496.89 100.000000 Page 27 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PD ----------- -1,018.24 -1,018.24 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,479.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAY-1999 61,478.65 61,478.65 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAY-1999 61,478.65 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-MAY-3.999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -111,643.57 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 01-MAY-1999 111,643.57 111,643.57 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-MAY-1999 -114,085.77 -114,085.77 100.000000 PD ----------- 2,442.20 -2,442.20 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 111,643.57 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-MAY-1999 -111,643.57 -111,643.57 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-MAY-1999 114,085.77 114,085.77 100.000000 PDC ----------- 2,442.20 2,442.20 1.000000D00 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -114,408.04 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-MAY-1999 114,408.04 114,408.04 100.000000 36225CC20 6,875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-14AY-1999 -116,910.72 -116,910.72 100.000000 PD ----------- 2,502.68 -2,502.68 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -114,408.04 GNMA II POOL 0080098M 01-MAY-1999 114,408.04 114,408.04 100.000000 36225CC20 6.B754 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-MAY-1999 114,408.04 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-MAY-1999 891,702.75 891,702.75 100.000000 26354BSR4 05/25/1999 25-MAY-1999 -891,702.75 -891,702.75 10D.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,450,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 04-MAY-1999 2,421,732.45 2,421,732.45 100.000000 313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 04-MAY-1999 -2,421,732.45 -2,421,732.45 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.D00000000 0.00 Page 28 MELLON TRUST . ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TMIOO RASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 18-MAY-1999 394,464.44 394,464.44 100.000000 313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 18-MAY-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 25-MAY-1999 989,473.00 889,473.00 100.000000 313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 25-MAY-1999 -889,473.00 -889,473.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 21-MAY-1999 1,291,976.83 1,291,976.83 100.000000 34539USMS 05/21/1999 21-MAY-1999 -1,291,976.83 -1,291,976.83 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 21-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-MAY-1999 888,840.00 888,840.00 100.000000 36959JS53 05/05/1999 05-MAY-1999 -888,840.00 -888,840.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 05-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-MAY-1999 3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00 100.000000 912827X72 06.3754 05/15/1999 DO 05/15/96 15-MAY-1999 -3,325,265.63 -3,325,265.63 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 15-MAY-1999 -25,265.63 -25,265.63 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 11-MAY-1999 25,216.67 25,216.67 0.000000 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 11-MAY-1999 25,216.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 03-MAY-1999 44,043.75 44,043.75 0.000000 073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 01-MAY-1999 44,043.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 125,510.67 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 17-MAY-1999 5,625.09 5,625.09 0.000000 Page 29 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAY-1999 5,625.09 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00OOD0000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 19-MAY-1999 13,794.97 13,794.87 0.000000 17120QE80 FLTG AT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-MAY-1999 13,794.87 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-MAY-1999 9,297.25 8,297.25 0.000000 263548SR4 05/25/1999 25-MAY-1999 8,297.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 03-MAY-1999 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.000000 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 01-MAY-1999 20,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 781,146.66 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 17-MAY-1999 67,641.34 67,641.34 0.000000 312ODD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-MAY-1999 67,641.34 0.00 0.000000 IT - 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 03,364.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 17-MAY-1999 19,577.20 19,577.20 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% O9/15/2032 01-APR-1999 19,577.20 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 27-MAY-1999 12.50 12.50 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 12.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-MAY-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-APR-1999 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 30 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TMIOO BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 45,668.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 17-MAY-1999 4,603.20 4,603.20 0.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-MAY-1999 4,603.20 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,408.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 16202 18-MAY-1999 11,400.92 11,408.92 0.000000 3133T17A4 6.0001 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-MAY-1999 11,409.92 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,450,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 04-MAY-1999 28,267.55 28,267.55 0.000000 313396FDO HAT 05/04/1999 04-MAY-1999 28,267.55 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 10-MAY-1999 5,535.56 5,535.56 0.000000 313396FT5 HAT 05/18/1999 18-MAY-1999 5,535.56 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 25-MAY-1999 10,527.00 10,527.00 0.000000 313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 25-MAY-1999 10,527.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,584.26 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 17-MAY-1999 898.30 898.38 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-MAY-1999 898.30 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 21-MAY-1999 9,023.17 8,023.17 0.000000 34539USM5 05/21/1999 21-MAY-1999 8,023.17 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 27-MAY-1999 25,516.75 25,518.75 0.000000 345397SCO FLTG AT O0/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 27-MAY-1999 25,518.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 31 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-14AY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61,478.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-MAY-1999 9,721.05 9,721.05 0.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-MAY-1999 9,721.05 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 114,408.04 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 20-MAY-1999 15,642.03 15,642.03 0.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-MAY-1999 15,642.03 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-MAY-1999 11,160.00 11,160.00 0.000000 36959JS53 05/05/1999 05-MAY-1999 11,160.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 05-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 03-MAY-1999 44,531.25 44,531.25 D.DD0000 370425QF0 7.125% 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/97 01-MAY-1999 44,531.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-MAY-1999 49,814.64 49,814.64 0.000000 370425QV5 FLTG RT O8/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 18-MAY-1999 49,814.64 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400570 04-MAY-1999 12,941.44 12,941.44 0.000000 44181KZT4 FLTG AT OB/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 02-MAY-1999 - 12,941.44 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 17-MAY-1999 65,563.50 65,563.50 0.000000 8124DQGW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 15-MAY-1999 65,563.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 17-MAY-1999 308,750.00 308,750.00 0.000000 912810DG0 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 15-MAY-1999 308,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00ODDD000 0.00 Page 32 MELLON TRUST .. ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 17-MAY-1999 165,625.00 165,625.00 0.000000 912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 15-MAY-1999 165,625.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-MAY-1999 641,250.00 641,250.00 0.000000 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 15-MAY-1999 641,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-MAY-1999 105,187.50 105,187.50 0.000000 912827X72 06.375% 05/15/1999 DD 05/15/96 15-MAY-1999 105,187.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 -13,100.00 -13,100.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -13,100.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 13,500.00 13,500.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 30-APR-1999 13,500.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECD INTEREST FOR APRIL 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 -13,500.00 -13,500.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 30-APR-1999 -13,500.00 0.00 0.000000 CDC TO REVERSE 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 13,100.00 13,100.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 30-APR-1999 23,100.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 04/30/99 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-MAY-1999 30,900.00 30,900.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 15-JAN-1999 30,900.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 33 MELLON TRUST ATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAY-1999 - 31-MAY-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ ODE BROKER CONPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 -9,030.00 -9,030.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -9,030.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 9,030.00 9,030.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-APR-1999 9,030.00 0,00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 04/30/99 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,420.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-MAY-1999 21,420.00 21,420.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 21,420.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-MAY-2999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 416.83 416.83 0.000000 996085247 01-MAY-1999 416.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MAY-1999 3,318.83 3,318.83 0.000000 996085247 01-MAY-1999 3,318.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-MAY-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 34 FAHR COMMITTEE P�ngox• TORBds. 6/9/99 6/23199 AGENDA REPORT 'tem NW FMRR99-01 'tem"��be Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: PROPOSED FY 1999-00 STRATEGIC GOALS WORKPLAN GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file 1999/00 Strategic Goals Workplan. SUMMARY The Strategic Goals Workplan is an annual planning tool designed to assist staff in reaching best-inclass status. The attached represents an internal tool utilized by management for the purpose of evaluating major program accomplishments. The Workplan details projects, programs, objectives and tasks designed to achieve these District-wide Strategic Goals: • Consistently Employ Strategic and Tactical Resource Planning. • Develop and Maintain an Effective and Efficient Workforce. • Consistently Apply Appropriate Technology. • Consistently Deliver Excellent Public Health and Environment Protection. • Consistently Deliver an Excellent Level of Service. The FY'99-00 Workplan development process represented additional refinements to prior work products. Both the Board of Directors and District staff suggested an increased focus on core business during the workplan development period. As a result, significant resource planning was involved prior to Strategic Goal task development. Full-time Equivalents (FTEs)were first assigned to Core Business and Unplanned Events, and then finally to Strategic Goal tasks. The results of this exercise have shown that the vast majority of District effort is dedicated to Core Business, with limited time available for re- engineering efforts associated with the Strategic Goals. It is Gear that Strategic Goals are critical to the success of this agency; yet it is also Gear that as the District re-engineers and "right-sizes," it will be increasingly difficult to balance the need for strategic goal work with core business functions. WadmWatllM WWgmdaTAHWah59J9 AHR® l Rax. ,� Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS FY 1999-00 Workplan Report x.w enp.,,e.ruw'r.nw.w.�u+mn ax a,,,,,., 1 s Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE MeetingDae Ta61283 O6109199 O6/73/99 AGENDA REPORT Rem Num4e Item Nu Ev FAHR99-4_2_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICTS ALL-RISK PROPERTY AND EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE PROGRAM, FY 1999-00 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period June 25, 1999 to May 15, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $890,250. SUMMARY This agenda item recommends the annual renewal of All-Risk Property and Earthquake insurance coverage for the District for FY 1999-00. The All-Risk insurance program provides comprehensive coverage for the District's real and personal property from all perils including fire, flood, earthquake, and business interruption. The 1999-00 All-Risk program is recommended for renewal with coverage enhance- ments including an increased $300 million loss sublimit for fire damage, and an increased $65 million loss sublimit for earthquake damage. At the same time, premium costs for 1999-00 will be at least $108,650 lower than last year's premium. The coverage enhancements and premium cost savings are related to placement of coverage through a recently completed nation-wide joint purchase property insurance program. Since the inception date of the program is May 15, 1999, the District's FY 99- 00 renewal period will be June 25, 1999 (expiration date of current policy) to May 15, 2000. Thereafter, the annual renewal cycle will be May 15 to May 15. This year's premium cost will be pro-rated to match the actual term of coverage (approximately $816,062). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A X\rp.haliBenEvlF.vNR�v92R9(FPNR6flv$E¢ R-.a: ,tea Page 1 T BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted (Joint Operating Insurance-$1,100,000). ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's FY 1998-99 All-Risk program has covered the District's property with a $300 million blanket loss limit for all perils, and with a $200 million sublimit for flood damage, and a $40 million sublimit for earthquake damage. The deductible for earthquake related claims is subject to a $100,000 minimum per occurrence. The deductible for all other perils is $25,000 per occurrence. Multiple insurance carriers underwrite the All-Risk program to distribute risk exposure and to ensure competitively bid premiums. Thus, the District's premium costs are controlled while obtaining maximum coverage levels for the Districts. 1999-00 Renewal Cycle At deadline for this report, Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, had marketed renewal of the District's All-Risk program to multiple insurance carriers. This renewal option would maintain the existing levels of coverage, but with a lower premium cost than last year's program ($895,000 vs. $998,900). Additionally, Driver developed an alternative renewal proposal through a recently completed nation-wide joint purchase property insurance program (Public Entity Property Insurance Program). As a result of the significant purchasing power ($19 million combined annual premium) of the joint purchase program, combined with pricing improvements in the property and casualty insurance market, this renewal option would improve the coverages of the District's 1999-00 All-Risk program, and would further reduce premium costs by at least$108,650 below last year's premium ($890,250 vs. $998,900). It is important to note that the joint purchase property insurance program involves no pooling or sharing of coverages with any other public entities. It should be noted that this year's premium represents a third consecutive year of cost savings, as the FY 1998-99 premium cost was $116,091 below the FY 1997-98 premium, and the FY 1997-98 premium cost was $102,925 lower than the FY 1996-97 premium. H:My.Gh Qw"WAHR ffih JBar AHRWH2E¢ R. „s„ Page 2 t Recommendation The 1999-00 All-Risk program is recommended for renewal through the joint purchase program with an enhanced $300 million loss limit for flood damage; a $100 million increase in coverage above the current $200 million limit, and an enhanced $65 million loss limit for earthquake coverage; a $15 million increase in coverage above the current $40 million limit. The attached Driver letter summarizes coverage and cost information for the 1999-00 All-Risk property insurance renewal. The annualized premium cost for FY 1999-00 will not exceed $890,250, including taxes and fees. The actual premium will be pro-rated to match the actual term of coverage, which will be June 25, 1999 to May 15, 2000 (approximately $816,062). ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Robert F. Driver Associates Letter Dated May 26, 1999 X!^9-EhbW^aobNIT eM6B9Par1FNIRB31].Ex R. „� Page 3 T ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOCIATES eDtetaonorRoberlF.IMrerCo.,toe. AOCIATZS Founded on Knowledge, integrity and.reivice. May 26, 1999 Mr. Steve Kozak Financial Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728 RE: All Risk Property Insurance Renewal,FY 99-00 Dear Steve, We have now concluded our marketing efforts for the June 25, 1999 renewal and are pleased to present two attractive options for your consideration. As marketplace conditions remain favorable, we have aggressively negotiated an approximate ten percent reduction in premium costs for renewal of the current program -$895,000(vs. $998,900 currently)—at a$300,000,000 coverage limit, subject to a$200,000,000 flood sub-limit and a$40,000,000 earthquake sub-limit. We have been successful in recently implementing a large and complex joint purchase property insurance program(similar to our excess workers' compensation and general liability insurance programs)which we believe offers an even more attractive alternative—an annual premium cost of$890,250 inclusive of taxes and fees at a$300,000,000 coverage limit,with increased sub-limits: $300,000,000 for flood and$65,000,000 for earthquake. Note that there is no pooling or sharing of coverage with other entities under this program in which we have taken advantage of scale economies(the combined premium is in excess of $19,000,000)and the marketplace environment to develop significantly more earthquake coverage at minimal cost,with insurers all designated A by A.M.Best's Rating Guide. Please review these quotations at your earliest convenience so that we may discuss in more detail as warranted. We recommend the group purchase program(PEPIP)option for its obvious cost and coverage benefits as well as for what we envision to be a much more stable placement should marketplace conditions deteriorate. Newport Doak 4041 MarArdmr Hh•d..ARgt A0. Ihn 6450. Neupn Rrarlt California 92658•6450 • (949)7.T6-0271 • Far(M)75rr2713 lir 0006N61 • u•vu•.r/drirrr.ram San Diego Feroxdido Sacramento Fresno San Francisco r Mr. Kozak May 26, 1999 Page two We shall forward a schedule of participating insurers and a summary detailing important policy terms and conditions under separate cover. Sincerely, ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES Donald H. McLean,Jr..; First Vice President DHMljd Attachement FAHR COMMITTEE meeting D• To ed.of Dir. 619M 6/26M AGENDA REPORT nemNumber �temyJrgqmx FAMR9&90 /4/4� Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-166) to the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agencv • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems - IT Personnel • Lab Support - Laboratory personnel 2. Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firms as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. SUMMARY The District has typically had short-term, low-volume temporary staffing needs and has contracted with one or two agencies to fulfill them. However, temporary staffing utilization is increasing with additional Engineering and IT projects. Since the increase in temporary costs exceeds $100,000, Board approval is needed. Three-quarters of the District's temporary labor needs are due to the increase in capital projects for the next five years. The Engineering department has already obtained approval from the Planning and Design Committee for the increase in the temporary staffing budget and will continue to provide the PDC with regular updates. Human Resources has interviewed each company listed in the recommendation and is satisfied that they can meet administrative requirements of doing business with the District. In the General Agency category, Apple One has agreed to a 40-50% markup rate for general, clerical, and light industrial staffing. Other companies have been used H hy.Cb�1F/JIP1F.�,W AHRW.A.CeI R. � Page 1 in the past, but only Apple One has been able to consistently supply the District with , high quality temporary employees. The technical firms work a little differently than the general temporary agencies. Instead of negotiating a markup rate up front, the Engineering and IT departments plan to put temporary staffing opportunities out to all of the qualified firms above and have them compete against each other for each assignment. Those companies who Find the most qualified candidate at the lowest price will be selected on a case-by-case basis. Instead of listing out all of the requirements that the temporary staffing firms need in order to do business with the District, a copy of the Districts generic temporary services contract is attached. Each company will need to sign it, or one like it, and agree to the proper insurance and employment practices. Because there may be other technical agencies we wish to use, and because the posting of the jobs will be an openly competitive process, staff is asking for the authority to enter into similar agreements with other agencies without having to return to the Board to approve each agency. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not to exceed $1 million BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: J.o. contractual services and capital Improvement Budgets) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Hire additional regular, full-time employees for an indefinite period or on a contractual basis. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Sample generic Temporary Services Contract H My OhNpeMiFAMM£e9dSBarFAIiF W:A tr1 R. vmm Page 2 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Agreement Between <SELLER FULL NAME> (Seller's Company Name) And The Orange County Sanitation District "OCSD" Agreement Number: Agreement Period: To Signatures: The undersigned agree that this document, consisting of pages and Exhibits through attached, is intended by the parties as the final expression of their agreement and is the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and and conditions. Orange County Sanitation District <SELLER FULL NAME> 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Seller's Company's Name Authorized Representative Authorized Representative Signature Signature Date Date 1. INTRODUCTION a 1.1 This Agreement and all attachments (called the"Agreement") is made by <BUYER FULL NAME> ("OCSD") and <SELLER FULL NAME> ("<SELLER>"). OCSD's worldwide subsidiaries may place orders under this Agreement. <SELLER> shall mean its employees, agents, and subcontractors. The Terms and Conditions herein exclusively govern the purchase and sale of <GOODS/SERVICES> described in Exhibit A Scope attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 1.2 This Agreement is the complete and entire understanding between the parties on this subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, discussions, proposals, representations, statements, or understandings whether written or oral. The provisions of this Agreement may be amended or waived only by a writing executed by authorized representatives of both parties hereto. 1.3 <SELLER>, including its agents and employees, is an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of OCSD. <SELLER> is NOT authorized to represent and OCSD expressly disclaims any liability resulting from such misrepresentation. 1.4 In the event that either party to this Agreement shall,on any occasion, fail to perform any provision of this Agreement, and the other party does not enforce that provision, the failure to enforce shall not prevent enforcement of the provision on any other occasion. 1.5 If any term of this Agreement conflicts with any term of an issued Purchase Order, this Agreement shall supersede the Purchase Order. 1.6 The term DAYS, when used in the Agreement, shall mean business days, unless otherwise noted as calendar days. 1.7 Except as expressly provided otherwise, OCSD accepts no liability for any expenses, losses, or action incurred or undertaken by <SELLER> as a result of work performed in anticipation of purchases of said goods or services by OCSD. _1 1.8 W This Agreement does not specify a quantity of goods or services to be purchased by OCSD, NOR DOES THIS AGREEMENT OBLIGATE OCSD TO PURCHASE ANY goods or services. All such quantities will be specified on OCSD's order(s)as defined in the Section on Purchase Orders, issued under the provisions of this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference. 2. PURCHASE ORDERS 2.1 This term "Purchase Order" shall mean OCSD's written Purchase Order form and/or Purchase Orders transmitted electronically and any documents incorporated therein by reference. 2.2 OCSD will order goods or services by issuing telex, facsimile, telephonic orders, or written Purchase Orders. OCSD will issue confirming written Purchase Orders within five (5) days after Issuing such telex,facsimile, or telephonic orders. 2.2A OCSD will order goods or services by issuing telex,facsimile, telephonic orders, or written Purchase Orders. OCSD will issue confirming written Purchase Orders within five (5) days after issuing such telex, facsimile, or telephonic orders. For Purchase Orders transmitted electronically, <SELLER>shall notify OCSD within one(1) day of receipt of a Purchase Order that<SELLER> has received such a Purchase Order in a readable and understandable format. The parties acknowledge that written Purchase Orders will not be issued for Purchase Orders transmitted electronically. The parties further agree not to contest the validity or enforceability of Purchase Orders transmitted electronically under the provisions of applicable law requiring that contracts be in writing and signed by the party to be bound. 2.3 Each Purchase Order will specify items such as: goods or services, quantity, delivery schedule, destination, total price of the Purchase Order. Each Purchase Order issued under this Agreement shall be made part of, and be incorporated into this Agreement, and shall reference this Agreement number on the face of each Purchase Order. Should any Purchase Order not conform to or satisfy the terms of this Agreement, <SELLER>shall have five (5) days after receipt to reject the Purchase Order. By not rejecting the Purchase Order within five (5) days, <SELLER> will have accepted the Purchase Order. Acceptance by<SELLER> is limited to the provisions of the Agreement and the Purchase Order. No additional or different provisions proposed by <SELLER>shall apply. In addition, the parties agree that this Agreement and issued Purchase Orders constitute a contract for the sale of goods and/or services and satisfy all statutory and legal formalities of a contract. 2.4 OCSD shall use its best efforts not to issue individual Purchase Orders for the purchase of goods or services with an invoice value of less than dollars. J 3. AGREEMENT PERIOD 3.1 The period during which OCSD may issue Purchase Orders under this Agreement (Agreement Period)shall last three (3)years, beginning on <EFFECTIVE DATE> (Effective Date)and ending on <EXPIRATION DATE> (Expiration Date) unless otherwise extended by mutual written consent by both parties. 3.1A The period during which OCSD may issue Purchase Orders under this Agreement (Agreement Period) shall begin on<EFFECTIVE DATE> (Effective Dale)and shall continue so long as both parties perform in accordance with this Agreement. This Agreement will terminate upon mutual written agreement by both parties or as otherwise provided in the Termination section. 4. PRICING FOR SERVICES 4.1 The prices for services are set forth in Exhibit A Scope and shall remain fixed for the period set forth therein (Pricing Period). Thirty (30)days prior to the end of the current Pricing Period, OCSD and <SELLER> shall review the Pricing and Scope for the next Pricing Period. Should OCSD and <SELLER> reach agreement, a new Exhibit A Scope will be written for the next Pricing Period and shall be added as an amendment to this Agreement. If OCSD and <SELLER> do not reach an agreement on the next Pricing Period, this Agreement shall end the current Pricing Period. 4.1A The prices for services are set forth in Exhibit A Scope and its amendments, and shall remain fixed during the Agreement Period and any extension thereof. 4.2 <SELLER> represents that prices established in Exhibit A Scope to be paid by OCSD, shall not exceed the prices charged to any other customer of<SELLER>for services which are the same or substantially similar to these services, taking into account the quantifies and terms of this Agreement. Moreover, <SELLER> agrees to refund any excess amounts paid by OCSD. 5. PAYMENT 5.1 OCSD shall forward payment thirty (30) calendar days after the later of the scheduled completion or delivery date, or the receipt of a correct invoice which references OCSD's purchase order number, or receipt of conforming goods or services. 5.2 Amounts owed to OCSD due to rejections or returns of non conforming goods or services will be, at OCSD's option, either credited against current or future invoices or paid by <SELLER> within thirty (30) days from <SELLER>'s receipt of both a request for payment and return of non conforming goods from OCSD. 6. TERMINATION 6.1 The occurrence of any of the following constitutes a breach by<SELLER> unless corrected by <SELLER> within five (5) days. <SELLER> failure to deliver goods and/or perform services on time. Goods delivered and/or services performed by <SELLER>do not conform with the terms set forth in this Agreement. <SELLER>fails to perform any material provision of this Agreement. OCSD and <SELLER> do not reach an agreement on the next Pricing Period. <SELLER>assigns this Agreement, or any obligation or rights hereunder. (The term "assign" to include, without limitation, a transfer of majority.) <SELLER> sells or merges with a third-party (not a parent or subsidiary company)without the prior written consent of OCSD. <SELLER> becomes insolvent or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or a receiver, or similar officer is appointed to take charge of all or part of<SELLER>'s assets. 6.2 <SELLER> shall cure any of the above breaches and notify OCSD of such cure within five (5) days from receipt of a notice to cure from OCSD. If<SELLER> fails to cure, OCSD may terminate this Agreement and/or any Purchase Order(s) issued hereunder by giving <SELLER> written notice. OCSD shall have no liability to <SELLER> thereafter except for payment of any balance due for conforming goods delivered or services performed prior to the date of OCSD's notice to cure. OCSD may, at its option and without regard to<SELLER>'s ability to cure, terminate this Agreement and/or any Purchase Order(s) issued hereunder for cause in the event of any second or subsequent instances of the above breaches by <SELLER>. 4 7. NOTIFICATION 7.1 Any notice given under this Agreement shall be written, or sent by telex, or facsimile. Written notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by any other overnight delivery service which delivers to the noticed destination and provides proof of delivery to the sender. Any telex or facsimile notice must be followed within three (3)days by written notice. All notices shall be effective when first received at the following addresses: If to<SELLER>: If to OCSD: with copies to: with copies to: 8. CONFIDENTIALITY 8.1 Both parties shall maintain, as confidential,and shall not disclose to any person outside its employ, nor use for purposes other than performance of this Agreement, any specifications, drawings, blueprints, data, business information, or other confidential information which is learned by virtue of this Agreement, except where required by law. Upon expiration of this Agreement, both parties shall promptly return all confidential material and copies to the other party. 8.2 Unless otherwise determined in writing by<SELLER>, OCSD may reproduce and use <SELLER>'s documentation provided by<SELLER> under this Agreement. 9. HOLD HARMLESS 9.1 <SELLER> shall defend, indemnity, and hold OCSD, its officers, directors, agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees), demands, or judgments("Claims")which results from or arise out of: The presence of the <SELLER>, or equipment, or tools used by<SELLER> in the performance of this Agreement on the property of OCSD or its customers; or The acts, errors, omissions, or negligence of<SELLER>while on the property of OCSD or its customers, regardless of whether the loss, damage, or injury resulting from same occurs after the<SELLER> has left such property; or The use by<SELLER>of OCSD's equipment, tools, or facilities whether or not any claims are based upon the condition of the equipment, tools, or facilities or OCSD's, its agents, or employees alleged negligence in permitting its use; or The nonpayment by <SELLER> of any monies due and owing a third party with whom <SELLER> has contracted at any time during the tens of this Agreement or any extension thereof. 9.2 <SELLER>agrees to carry at all times and with companies acceptable to OCSD, insurance of the kinds listed below: a. Worker's Compensation coverage. b. Employer Liability Self Insurance. c. Comprehensive General Liability including Contractual Liability, Independent Contractor's Liability, Products and/or Completed Operations Liability, and Personal Injury/Property Damage Coverages. d. Automobile Liability for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles. 9.3 <SELLER> further agrees to fumish OCSD with Certificates of Insurance evidencing the specified coverages and stating that the policies may not be changed or terminated without at least ten (10) days prior written notice to OCSD. 10, APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS 10.1 <SELLER> shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The <SELLER> also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless from any and all damages and liabilities assessed against OCSD as a result of the <SELLER>'s non compliance therewith. Any permission required by law to be included herein shall be deemed included as a part of this Agreement whether or not specifically referenced. 11. FORUM FOR ENFORCEMENT 11.1 This Agreement and any Purchase Order issued hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of<STATE>. 11.2 Any controversy or claim arising out of, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement or a breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration under the arbitration rules of the (indicate local arbitration board). The arbitration proceeding shall be governed by the Statutes of the State of<STATE>, and the proceeding shall be held in the City in that State - where the principal office is located. Anything to the contrary contained in the above mentioned rules and statutes notwithstanding, the parties consent that any papers, notices, or process necessary or proper for the institution or continuance of, or relating to any arbitration proceeding, or for the confirmation of an award and entry of judgment on any award made, including appeals in connection with any judgment or award, may be served on each of the parties by registered mail addressed to the party at the principal office of the party or by personal service on the party in or without the above mentioned state. The parties hereby recognize and consent to the above mentioned arbitration association's jurisdiction over each and every one of them. 12. DISPUTES 12.1 Any dispute arising under this Agreement which is not resolved by the OCSD and <SELLER>shall be decided by a court of law under the terms of the section on Forum for Enforcement. Pending settlement of the final decision by the court, <SELLER> shall proceed diligently with the performance of the Agreement in accordance with OCSD's direction. 13. EXHIBIT A SCOPE-TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AGENCY 13.1 <SELLER>shall provide OCSD with qualified Contract Workers upon receipt of OCSD's Purchase Orders. To fulfill this requirement, <SELLER> shall, among other things; - Understand thoroughly all qualifications and performance requirements which OCSD expects of Contract Workers and ensure that all Contract Workers satisfy those requirements. - Review and verify potential Contract Worker's professional, educational, personal, and other qualifications. - Personally interview potential Contract Workers and perform reference checks with previous employers and others. - Obtain Contract Worker's permission before submitting the Worker's resume or other employment information to OCSD. - Upon OCSD's request, arrange interviews with OCSD representatives. At OCSD's option, such interviews shall be conducted at OCSD's facilities. - Certify individual Contract Worker's physical and mental fitness for the job. Examination for physical and mental fitness certification by <SELLER> or its agents shall occur only after<SELLER> has made an offer of employmentlplacement. - Make placements on a first in time, most qualified basis without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. 13.2 If OCSD advises <SELLER> that a specific position requires safety equipment of any sort, (including, for example, metal toe protectors, steel toed shoes, safety glasses, etc.) licenses, or certificates of training, <SELLER> shall ensure that Contract Worker has such safety equipment, licenses or certificates of training prior to performing any Service for OCSD. Such certificates of training or licenses shall be made available to OCSD upon request. If Contract Worker(s)does not have required equipment or training when scheduled to perform Services, OCSD may, at its option: - Provide such equipment or training to Contract Worker, the cost of which shall be borne by the <SELLER>and deducted by OCSD from the next weekly<SELLER> invoice. - Refuse to accept the Services of any such Contract Worker(s). - Remove Contract Worker(s)for failure to obtain required equipment or training. 13.3 OCSD shall have no liability to the<SELLER> in the event a Contract Worker registers with another third party agency and is thereafter placed with OCSD. 13.4 COMPENSATION, BENEFITS <SELLER> shall employ Contract Workers and shall be solely responsible to establish the methods of compensation and benefits during their employment by<SELLER>. All Contract Workers shall be "W-2"employees of<SELLER>. <SELLER>shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws regarding wages and hours for Contract Workers. <SELLER> shall pay Contract Workers directly and shall withhold any applicable employment taxes including, but not limited to, any federal, state, county, or city withholding taxes, unemployment tax, and Federal Social Security withholding amounts. <SELLER> shall be responsible for unemployment compensation contributions and/or coverage and workman's compensation contributions and/or coverage for all Contract Workers placed with OCSD. <SELLER>shall be the provider of any and all benefits including medical or disability benefits. As provided in 13.12, Contract Workers are not entitled to any OCSD benefits and are not entitled to participate in any benefit plans that are open to those individuals listed on OCSD's payroll as regular employees. Contract workers shall remain ineligible for such benefits or participation in such benefit plans even if a court later decides that OCSD misclassified the workers for tax purposes. 13.5 NO INTERRUPTIONS/OTHER ASSIGNMENTS If a Contract Worker fails to appear for work for any reason, the <SELLER>will be obligated to provide other qualified labor so that no interruption shall occur. Upon termination of a Contract Worker's assignment, OCSD will advise <SELLER>whether or not that Contract Worker is eligible to return to OCSD for other assignments after thirty(30)days. 13.6 HOURS WORKED. Contract Workers are paid for time worked and not or holidays or other days or hours during which no work is performed. MEAL BREAKS. Contract Workers are not paid for lunch or other meal periods during a work day. Meal periods should be reflected in submitted time slips and invoices. , e 13.7 OVERTIME Overtime shall be determined as follows: - Overtime shall be paid at the rate of time and one-half for all hours worked in excess of eight(8) hours in any one day. - If a shift or extended work period goes past midnight, all consecutive hours worked after midnight are considered part of the previous day. - Overtime shall also be paid at the rate of time and one-half for all hours worked in excess of forty (40) hours in any one work week. 13.8 NO HOLIDAY PREMIUM In the event that the Contract Worker is required to perform work on OCSD's assignable holidays, no hourly rate premium shall be paid. 13.9 <SELLER>'s Fee. OCSD shall pay <SELLER> a fee which is calculated by multiplying the bill rate for the particular job code by the number of hours worked by the Contract Worker(not including meal periods). <SELLER>'s Mark-up (to cover expenses, profit, and enhancements to Contract Worker's compensation/benefits package, (if any), shall be a percentage of each Contract Worker's Direct Labor Rate. 13.10 DIRECT LABOR RATE Seller shall pay, at minimum, the"Direct Labor Rate"to its Contract Workers. 13.11 SHUTDOWNS When facility shutdowns occur due to factors beyond OCSD's control, payment to Agency for Contract Worker's Services shall only be, as in all other instances, for actual hours worked. 13.12 BENEFITS/ACTIVITIES Contract Workers are employees of<SELLER>. Contract workers are not entitled to any OCSD benefits that are given to those individuals listed on OCSD's payroll as regular employees. Contract workers are ineligible to join or participate in any benefit plans offered to those individuals listed on OCSD's payroll as regular employees. Contract workers shall remain ineligible for such benefits or participation in such benefit plans even if a court later decides that OCSD misclassified the workers for tax purposes. 13.13 WEEKLY INVOICES <SELLER> shall submit invoices at one week intervals unless Contract Worker services have been completed. Such weekly invoices shall have all necessary time cards attached. 13.14 OCSD has the right to hire and may hire Contract Workers into its own workforce at any time without liability to <SELLER>. OCSD may remove from OCSD's facilities any Contract Worker with or without cause at any time, and shall give <SELLER>written or oral notice of such removal within forty-eight (48) hours or during <SELLER>'s next regular business hours, if later. Upon removal of a Contract Worker, <SELLER> shall: - Immediately slop provision of services by the affected Contract Worker(s), and ensure the Contract Worker does not report for work the following scheduled work day. - Notify<SELLER>of fees incurred up to the date of removal. Such fees shall not exceed, and OCSD will not be obligated to pay fees more than the unpaid balance due for the actual hours worked by such Contract Worker(s) prior to OCSD's removal of the Contract Worker. - Not replace any Contract Worker who has been removed unless so requested by OCSD. - Not fill any order with a Contract Worker who has previously been removed without the prior approval of OCSD. 13.15 RATES DIRECT LABOR RATE (DR) BILL RATE (BR) MARK UP PERCENTAGE (MU) PER HOUR JOBDESCRIPTION 1ST 2ND 3RD MU% SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT FAHR COMMITTEE N -goate ToBd.ofDt,. • 06/09/99 06P3/99 AGENDA REPORT ft m Numbe Item Numbs FAHR994 17( ) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1999-00 SEWER SERVICE USER FEES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD99-09, Approving a Report on Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Establishing the Amount of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for All Revenue Areas for Fiscal Year 1999-00; and Directing the County Auditor to Add Such Charges to the 1999-00 Secured Tax Roll. SUMMARY In 1996 the Board adopted a five-year schedule of annual sewer service user fees, effective from 1997-98 through 2001-02. In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate structure. As a result of this structure change, which better correlated non- residential fees with use, the base rates implemented for 1998-99 in five of the service areas were lower than those originally adopted. Reducing the base single-family residential rate reduces all other rates because they are adopted as a percentage of the base rate. It is possible, once again, to adopt fees in four of those five areas that are somewhat below those originally authorized. This is possible because of the structure change, increased property assessed valuations, reduced operating budgets, and a revised borrowing plan. The proposed 1999-2000 budget has been prepared using these lower fees. The proposed rates and the already adopted rates are shown in the following table: Single Family Residential Rates Revenue 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 Area Current Rate Adopted Rate Proposed Rate 1 $96.41 $110.04 $110.04 2 74.00 77.00 76.00 3 75.50 77.00 76.00 5 84.50 96.75 87.50 6 79.00 82.D0 80.00 7 60.00 66.00 66.00 11 80.00 90.1)D 90.00 13 100.00 100.00 100.00 Nwanu.em,e wow n.00,au am em,e er=u n�».am B.W..¢ lINiY! Page 1 14 All Revenue Area 14 Costs are Paid Directly by IRWD ' Multi-Family Residential Rates Revenue 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 Area Current Rate Ado led Rate Proposed Rate 1 $67.49 $77.03 $77.03 2 51.80 53.90 53.20 3 52.85 53.90 53.20 5 59.15 67.73 61.20 6 55.30 57.40 56.00 7 42.00 46.20 46.20 11 56.00 63.00 63.00 13 70.00 70.00 70.00 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Steering Committee has directed staff to evaluate, and report to them, the impacts and ramification of adopting a single base sewer service user fee for the entire OCSD service area. This evaluation and the identification and evaluation of alternatives is a work plan item for 1999-2000. ALTERNATIVES Implement higher rates adopted prior to structure change. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None Xtwy.p`KW*N NAgm &Rl 11M�N Ap"a R*pera`MWAem 17(p)Je[ Rw a Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-09 ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR ALL REVENUE AREAS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING A REPORT ON SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES; ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR ALL REVENUE AREAS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-00; AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO ADD SUCH CHARGES TO THE 1999-00 SECURED TAX ROLL The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND, ORDER and RESOLVE as follows: Section 1: That by the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05 on July 1, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District elected to adopt, impose, and collect rates and charges for sanitary sewer services and facilities provided by said District, and established procedures related thereto. The sanitary sewer service charges were set by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, as set forth therein. Section 2: As part of the budget preparation process, the District's Management has prepared financial and engineering reports, setting forth financial projections for providing the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities to the District's service areas for the forthcoming Fiscal Year 1999-00. Said reports have been made available to the public for Fiscal Year 1999-00. The charges established by Ordinance No. OCSD-05 reflect an allocation of the costs of operation and maintenance, such that the charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to provide the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities. Section 3: Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218), as of July 1, 1997, sanitary sewer service charges are deemed assessments. The sanitary sewer service charges set by Ordinance No. OCSD- 05 comply with the provisions of Article XIIID, in that they are existing charges first set by the Board of Directors of the District prior to November 6, 1996. The charges are not increased, and the methodology for the rate is the same as in previous years. The charges are imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs, maintenance, and operating expenses of the District's sewer facilities. TLW:pi:D:06H 7/99:01 OM3 1 Section 4: That pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 5473, a report has been filed with the District's Board Secretary containing a description of each parcel of real property, and the amount of the charges imposed by Ordinance No. OCSD-05 for Fiscal Year 1999-00. Section 5: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473.1, the filing of the report was duly noticed, as required by law, of a public meeting to be held on June 23, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, at the Board's meeting room, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, to consider oral or written objections or protests regarding such report. Section 6: That pursuant to such notice, a public meeting to hear all objections or protests, if any, to the aforesaid report and proposed charges was held at the date and time set forth in such notice. Section 7: That after considering all protests, if any, the Board has determined that such report should be approved as filed. Section 8: That the rates and charges set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-05 are affirmed or modified by the Board of Directors, as consistent with the findings hereinabove stated, for Fiscal Year 1999-00, in the fallowing amounts: Single Family Residential Rates Revenue Area 1999-00 Rate 1 $110.04 2 $ 76.00 3 $ 76.00 5 $ 87.50 6 $ 80.00 7 $ 66.00 11 $ 90.00 13 $100.00 14 All Revenue Area 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by IRWD. TLw:pj:D:Ml 7MI1 W453 2 Multi- Family Residential Rates Revenue Area 1999-00 Rate 1 $77.03 2 $53.20 3 $53.20 5 $61.20 6 $56.00 7 $46.20 11 $63.00 13 $70.00 Section 9: That the County Auditor be, and hereby is, ordered and directed to add such sanitary sewer service charges to the 1999-00 secured tax roll. Section 10: That the Board Secretary shall cause a copy of this Resolution and such report, in either written or electronic form, to be filed with the Orange County Auditor on or before August 10, 1999. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 23, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary TLW:pj'.D:W/1759:M1 Wd 3 3 FAHR COMMITTEE MeetlngDate TOBd.Mgr. osroarsa asrz3rag rl I AGENDA REPORT UMem ee Van,ar roper FMP-99AS Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONNECTION FEE REDUCTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file letter dated May 12, 1999 from Legacy Partners, requesting a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels paid in December 1998 and January 1999, and a partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for two parcels to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates, in the amount of$183,896.00; 2) Deny request for partial refund of capital facilities capacity charge rates for three parcels/permits paid in December 1998 and January 1999; 3) Approve request to grant fee reduction for two parcels/permits to be paid prior to the effective date of District's proposed ordinance for capital facilities capacity charge rates. SUMMARY Legacy Partners, an Orange County developer, has requested that the connection fee structure to be adopted by the Board subsequent to the RAC process, a FAHR Committee review, and an Ordinance and Proposition 218 public hearing, be applied to five of their buildings in Fullerton. Fees for three of these low-demand warehouse-type buildings were paid in December and January. Fees for the remaining two buildings are expected to be paid during the Ordinance adoption process. None of the buildings are expected to be occupied prior to July 1, 1999. Approving the General Managers recommendation would leave the current fees in effect for the first three buildings, but would allow the proposed fees to be effective for the second two buildings. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed connection fee rate for warehouse-type buildings is $110 per 1,000 square feel, a $362 reduction from existing rates. The three buildings already permitted have a total of 265,450 square feet. Granting Legacy's request for these buildings would reduce connection fees by $96,093. The two buildings about to be constructed contain a total of 242,550 square feet. Applying the proposed rate to these buildings would reduce fees by $87,803. This is the General Manager's recommendation. The total requested reduction is $183,896. HM Ebppan TAHWah9NRa�/HRF JY R. saris Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES 1. Charge connection fees at the rate in effect when the building permits were/are issued. 2. Allow the reduced/proposed rates for the two buildings not currently permitted, and for the three buildings permitted in December 1998 and January 1999. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Letter dated May 12, 1999 from Legacy Partners M M Jtl W MFANRtM1BAbr1F.W R W IS.Ux n....a. enuve Page 2 l III■ .° May 12. 1999 VIA FAX 714-962-3954&U.S.MAIL III■ Mr. Gary Strecd III■ Dirctu r of Finance PARTNERS LEGACY Orange County Saoimtion District P.O.Box 9127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 9mm,m rea,,�,;a 1m imne U 92616 41 Re:Fullerton Crosvoads Scwer Connection Fees rent. Dray Mr. Strand: Legacy Partners is the developer of Futlmton C:rxirrads,a 75 acre indust ial business park on the site of the former Hunt- Wesson Cannery in Fullerton We am in the muds of constricting five new warehouse/lighr manufacturing buildings totaling 508,000 spore feet. The first tbrec shell building permits were paid for and pulled several months ago. The goal two shell building permits will be paid for and pulled In the next few days. As you know,the City collects the OCSD's canumhun fees at the time ofboilding permit issualtm We understand that a proposal is or will be but=your Bard of Directors;raising the connection fees to moan fairly assess uses and unpaas by cusiorms. It is proposed that the typical low,demand industriallcommercial user will pay S110 per 1,000 square feet,while the present charge is$472 per 1,000 square feet,a svbsmntial reduction. We understand that these fee«visions,if approved, may become effective on July 1, 1999 or Sooner. As our new building construction is speculative development and oriented toward warehouse uses,the mgjority,of tenors vnU have minimal onsite water coasumptinn and sewer discharge related only to cmyLoyee resUmnas. Since these future tenants will take occupancy of all of these buildings after July 1, 1999, we respectfully request that our connection feu be based on the revised fed, if approved. We are also requesting a refund of the extra connection for paid when the hrst several shell building permits were paid. This lerrer is being filed pursuant to Gov.Code section 66020 a seq. Outlined below Is the relevant information on dac new buildings and the sewn connection fees: Building"A"a[620 N.Gilbert Sired 93,400 squire fat x .472 = S44,084.80 Paid Dec. 1998 Building"B"at 590 N.G1ibw Street 75.090 square fw x 472 = $35,442.48 Paid Dec. 1998 Buildiag"C"at 610 N. (ilben Street 96,960 Square feet x .472 = S45,765.12 Paid fan. 1999 Subtotal 265,450 sluarc fed Building"E"a 590 N. Gilbert Street 94.600 square feet x .472 = S44,651.20 To be paid Building"F"at 540 N.Gi16er Street 147950 Squire, x.472 9 832.40 To be paid Subtotal 242,550 square feet Grand Total 508,000 square Eiet $239,776.00 Therefore,if and when the fee revisions arc approved and became effective,we respectfully request a refund totaling to S 183.896.00 which represents the difference between the misting and proposed connection fee rate, times the toes] square footage. This information can be verified with tbe City of Fullerton Building Depanmrmt. Please call me at 949- 261-9871 Eat 130 ifyou need any additional information or clarification. Sincerely, LEGACY PARTNERS For COLN—RECP FpLLERTON OPCO,LLC Michael Morris AcquisitionUDevelopment Manager t':Wr Dvavo %f ft wS C, ..&V)C$Da,s,eeMurcmmc " FAHR COMMITTEE Mee6ngMe I ToXads. 06/09/99 06/23/99 R AGENDA REPORT emNumbe I INNerPT FAHR99i7 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: PROPOSED FY 1999-00 OPERATING, CAPITAL, DEBT/COP SERVICE AND SELF-INSURANCE BUDGETS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Joint Boards of Directors recommend approval of the proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 1999-00 to the Board of Directors on June 23, 1999, as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $44.000.000 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance $330,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance $792,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving $68,771,000 Collection System Operating $9,356,500 Collection System Capital Improvements $23,629,000 Debt/COP Service $41,690,000 SUMMARY The 1999-00 Budget is enclosed for the Committee's consideration. The Budget has been presented to the OMTS and PDC Committees at their regular June meetings in order to allow each Standing Committee an opportunity to review the proposal prior to the June Board meeting. The entire Budget will be presented for Board consideration on June 23, 1999. Although each Committee has had an opportunity to review the proposal, it remains the responsibility of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to recommend approval of the Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. The remaining budgets are also being presented to the FAHR Committee as a result of consolidation. The FAHR Committee is requested to recommend that the Board of Directors approve this budget. KM .CYYp�WAHRFAh W ffAHR W]J R�.. ,yam Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed 1999-00 Budget GGS:lc R—..a. 1� Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE MemR9 Date TOBd.mo". AGENDA REPORT nem Number nem Numbr FAHR99-98 IND Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Employer-Employee Relations Resolution GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve in concept Resolution No. OCSD 99-_, Adopting Rules and Regulations for Employer-Employee Relations and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; 2) Direct the Director of Human Resources to meet and consult with affected employee organizations re contents of Resolution No. OCSD 99_; and 3) Return to the Board for final adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 99-_with any recommended modifications at its regular meeting of July 21, 1999. SUMMARY It has been nearly 25 years since the District updated the rules and regulations regarding the unions and negotiations. Changes in the law since 1975 make it desirable and appropriate to update the old employment relations rules. The primary feature of the new Resolution is that it allows only one employee organization per bargaining unit, thus eliminating the possibility of having multiple organizations representing employees in the same classifications and units. Section 6 of the old Resolution 75-127 allows recognition of an employee organization by any "reasonable method". After the District adopted that Resolution, the Supreme Court held that a public agency could restrict a bargaining unit to representation by only one employee organization. However, in order to do so, the Court stated that the public agency must (1) adopt an employee relations ordinance providing for exclusive representation, and (2) hold an election among the employees. (Covina Azusa Firefighters v. City of Azuza) The new Resolution also allows the Director of Human Resources to modify bargaining units based on his or her own initiative, rather than only upon request of an employee organization. Finally, it contains a "grandfather clause"so as not to disturb the rights of existing employee organizations. After Board approval, the District must "meet and consult" prior to final adoption of the Resolution. M1 W geneaNN naenaa RepmiM eoam AQnnea Reporowe em 1741M Rm,e,.. arcs, Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY y BUDGETIMPACT ' ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Draft resolution HM ppVpnNe dApmEe Re{w %l M�N Apen]a Reµ,N`m6 M17W 0'A Re a.,om Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99- ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING A NEW EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS RESOLUTION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-34. WHEREAS, Joint Resolution No. 75-127 established rules and regulations for Employer-Employee Relations of the former County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, upon consolidation of the Districts into the Orange County Sanitation District, former Joint Resolution No. 75-127 was re-enacted without change as Resolution No. OCSD 98-34; and WHEREAS, changes in the laws and District practices since 1975 make it desirable and appropriate to update the District's employment relations rules and regulations, and WHEREAS, State law (the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act) permit local agencies to adopt reasonable rules and regulations for the orderly administration of labor relations after meeting and consulting with appropriate labor organizations, NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: SECTION 1: That this Resolution adopting rules and regulations for employer- employee relations and repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-34 is approved in concept. Section 2: That the Director of Human Resources is directed to meet and consult with affected employee organizations and return to this board for final adoption with any recommended modifications. ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This Resolution implements Chapter 10, division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Sections 3500 et seq.) captioned "Local Public Employee Organizations", by providing orderly procedures for the administration of employer- employee relations between the District and its employee organizations. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of the State law. It is the purpose of this Resolution to provide procedures for meeting and conferring in good faith with recognized employee organizations regarding the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment of employees in appropriate units and that are not preempted by Federal or State law. This policy is supplemented by provisions recognizing and defining the rights of employees to join organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on matters affecting employee relations or to represent themselves individually in dealing with the District. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated, a. "Appropriate representation unit* means a group of employee classes or positions, established in accordance with the criteria set forth in Article 11, Section 6. b. "Confidential employees" are those employees who, with authorized access, assist and act in a confidential capacity to and for persons who formulate, determine, and effectuate management policies with respect to labor relations. C. "Consult" means to communicate verbally or in writing for the purpose of presenting and obtaining views and advising of intended action. d. "Contract employee" means an individual who works for the District pursuant to a written contract as set forth in Policy A10.00 in the "Human Resources Department Policies and Procedures" manual. e. "Day' means calendar day unless expressly stated otherwise. I. "District" means the Orange County Sanitation District. g. "District representative" means any individual designated to represent the District with regard to employer-employee relations. h. "Regular employee" means any person employed by the District except elected officials and temporary and contract employees. 2 i. "Employee organization" means any organization which includes employees of the District and which has as one of its primary purposes representing such employees in their employment relations with the District. j. "Employee Relations Officer means the Director of Human Resources or the Director's designee. k. "Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization" means the employee organization which has been formally acknowledged by the District as the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate representation unit, pursuant to a majority vote of the employees in such a unit. There shall be no recognition of employee organizations other than exclusive recognition. I. "Impasse" means the existence of unresolved differences after good faith negotiations over an issue regarding wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment. M. "Management Employee" means an employee having responsibility for formulating, administering or managing the implementation of District policies and programs. n. "Mediation" means the efforts of an impartial third person, or persons, functioning as intermediaries, to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary resolution of an impasse. o. "Meet and confer in good faith", or "meet and confer", means that the representatives of EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS and the District shall have the mutual obligation personally to meet and confer promptly upon request by either party and continue for a reasonable period of time in order to exchange freely information, opinions, and proposals, and to endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation, including the mutual obligation to execute a written document incorporating any agreement reached. p. "Proof of Employee Support" means (1) an authorization card recently signed and dated by an employee, or (2) a verified authorization petition or petitions recently signed and dated by an employee, or (3) employee dues deduction authorization, using the payroll register for the period immediately prior to the date a petition is filed except that dues deduction authorizations for more than one employee organization for the account of any one employee shall not be considered as proof of employee support. The only authorization which shall be considered as proof of employee support shall be the authorization last signed by an employee. The words "recently signed" shall mean within sixty (60) days prior to the filing of a petition. 3 q. "Professional Employees" means employees engaged in work requiring specialized knowledge and skills attained through completion of a recognized course of instruction, including but not limited to, attorneys, physicians, registered nurses, engineers, architects, teachers, and the various types of physical, chemical, and biological scientists. r. "Resolution" means, unless otherwise specified herein, this "Employer-Employee Relations Resolution" and any amendments thereto. S. 'Scope of Representation" means all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee relations, concerning which the District is obligated by law to meet and confer, including, but not limited to, wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment; except that the parties may, by mutual agreement, negotiate on matters of employment concerning issues upon which negotiation is neither required nor prohibited by the law or this Resolution. I. "Supervisory employee" means any employee having authority, in the interest of the District, to hire, transfer, suspend, layoff, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but required the use of independent judgment. SECTION 3. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES a. Employees of the District shall have the right to form, join and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on matters within the scope of representation. b. Employees of the District shall also have the right to refuse to join or participate in the activities of employee organizations and shall have the right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with the district to the extent permitted bylaw. C. No employee shall be interfered with, dominated, intimidated, restrained, coerced or discriminated against by the District because of the exercise of the rights contained in this Resolution. d. No employee shall be interfered with, intimidated, restrained, coerced or discriminated against by any employee organization because of the exercise of the rights contained in this Resolution. SECTION 4. MANAGMEENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES a. In order to insure that the District is able to carry out functions and responsibilities imposed by law, the District has and will retain the exclusive right 4 to manage and direct the performance of District services, which includes, among others, the exclusive right to: • Determine issues of public policy, determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set levels and standards of service; • Determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment; direct its employees; • Relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other lawful reasons; • Maintain the efficiency of District operations; • Contract out work; • Determine the methods, means and personnel by which District operations are to be conducted; and, exercise control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work. b. The District retains its right to amend, modify, or rescind any policies, practices or agreements which impact upon wages, hours or working conditions of employees in cases of emergency. Emergencies shall be defined as acts of God, natural disasters, legislative acts, judicial action or other acts which are beyond the control of the District, and which would authorize District action without meeting and conferring under State law. If under this section the District amends, modifies or rescinds any policy, practice or agreement, such amendment, modification or rescission will continue only for the duration of the emergency. ARTICLE II. EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION PROCEEDINGS SECTION 1. FILING OF RECOGNITION PETITION BY EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION An employee organization that seeks to be formally acknowledged as the EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION representing the employees in an appropriate representation unit shall file a statement with the Employee Relations Officer containing the following information and documentation: a. Name and address of the employee organization. b. Names and titles of its officers. 5 C. Names of employee organization representatives who are authorized to act on behalf of the organization. d. A statement that the employee organization has, as one of its primary purposes, representing employees in their employment relations with the District. e. A statement whether the employee organization is a chapter Of, or affiliated directly or indirectly in any manner, with a local, regional, state, national or international organization, and, if so, the name and address of each such other organization. f. Certified copies of the employee organization's Constitution and By-Laws. g. A designation of those persons, not exceeding two in number, and their addresses, to whom notice sent by regular United States mail will be deemed sufficient notice to the employee organization for any purpose. h. The job classifications or titles of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate. i. A statement that the employee organization has in its possession proof of employee support to establish that thirty percent (30%) of the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate have designated the employee organization to represent them in their employment relations with the District. j. A request that the District formally acknowledge the petitioner as the EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION representing the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate for the purposes of meeting and conferring in good faith. k. The petition, including the proof of employee support and all accompanying documentation, shall be declared to be true, correct and complete, under penalty of perjury, by the duly authorized officer(s) of the employee organization executing it. I. The District or its Employee Relations Officer may request verification of the sufficiency of the signatures submitted in support of a petition. Such request for verification shall be made within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the petition. SECTION 2. RESPONSE TO RECOGNITION PETITION Upon receipt of the Petition, the Employee Relations Officer shall determine whether: a. There has been compliance with the requirements of a Recognition Petition; and, 6 b. The proposed representation unit is an appropriate unit in accordance with Section 6 of Article II. If an affirmative determination is made by the Employee Relations Officer on the foregoing two matters, he or she shall post a notice of election setting an election date not less than forty-five (45) days and not more than sixty (60) days after such determination. If either of the foregoing matters are not affirmatively determined, the Employee Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the petitioning employee organization. The petitioning employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition or appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer pursuant to Article II, Section 8 of this Resolution. SECTION 3. OPEN PERIOD FOR FILING CHALLENGING PETITION Within thirty (30) days of the date the notice of election is posted, any other employee organization may file a request to be the EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION of employees in the same unit by filing a petition which conforms to Section 1 of Article Il. SECTION 4. ELECTION PROCEDURE a. The Employee Relations Officer shall arrange for a secret ballot election to be conducted by the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service or by a mutually selected third party subject to the provisions of this Resolution. In the event the State Mediation and Conciliation Service, or other mutually selected third party, if any, declines or is unable to conduct the election in a timely fashion, the election shall be conducted by the Secretary to the Board of Directors in accordance with the election procedures specified in this Resolution. All employee organizations who have duly submitted petitions which have been determined to be in conformance with Section 1 of Article II shall be included in the ballot. The ballot shall also reserve to employees the choice of no representative. Regular and temporary employees employed in positions within the designated appropriate unit who were so employed during the pay period which ended at least fifteen (15) days before the date the election commences, shall be entitled to vote in a representation election. Regular and temporary employees who did not work during such period because of illness, vacation or other authorized leaves of absence, and who are employed by the District in the same unit on the date of the election shall also be eligible to vote in a representation election. An employee organization shall be formally acknowledged as the EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION for the designated appropriate unit following an election or run- off election if it received a majority of all valid votes cast in the election. In an election involving three or more choices, where none of the choices receives a majority of the valid votes cast, a run-off election shall be conducted between the 7 two choices receiving the largest number of valid votes cast. The rules governing an initial election shall be applicable to a runoff election. b. Within 30 days prior to an election, the District's Employee Relations Officer will present to the agency conducting the election, and the applicable employee organization(s), a list of eligible voters in the appropriate unit for which the employee organization(s) has made a satisfactory showing of interest. The eligibility list will be kept current by the District during the month before the election and a revised eligibility list will be presented to the applicable employee organization(s) and the agency conducting the election on the day(s) of the election. Either the District or the employee organization or organizations participating in the election may challenge any name on the list of eligible voters, including the revised list, at any time, up to and including the day(s) of the election. No challenges to the eligibility list may be made after the election has concluded. The agency conducting the election shall determine who is an eligible employee and its decision shall be final and binding. C. Election ballots shall offer eligible employees a choice between representation by the employee organization or organizations involved, on the one hand, and no organization, on the other. The ballot question shall read as follows: "Do you want [insert name of employee organizationl to act as your exclusive representative: Yes_ No ° The question will be repeated where more than one employee organization will be on the ballot. The question will be followed by the question, "Do you want no organization? Yes_ No d. There shall be no more than one representation election under this Resolution for each designated appropriate unit, excluding run-off elections, in a 12-month period. e. Costs of conducting elections under this Section shall be bome in equal shares by District and by each of the employee organizations appearing on the ballot. f. The election will be held on the District's premises at a time and on the date selected by the Employee Relations Officer for the election, or by mail ballots, in the discretion of the Employee Relations Officer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employee Relations Officer and petitioning employee organization may agree to a different election date so long as it is consistent with the employees' rights to choose their representative and there is a reasonable basis for such stipulation. g. The agency conducting the election shall also be responsible for maintaining the voting site, the ballot box and tallying the votes at the conclusion of the election day(s). The conducting agency shall certify the results of the election to both parties as soon as it has counted the ballots. h. If it is determined that an Employee Organization has received affirmative votes from a majority of the eligible employees casting ballots in an appropriate unit, 8 the Employee Relations Officer shall so report to the District's Board of Directors at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Upon receiving such a report, the Board of Directors shall certify the employee organization as the Exclusive Representative for the unit in which the election was held. Once such certification is given, it may only be withdrawn if the Exclusive Representative subsequently loses a decertification election or if the District has a good faith belief that the Exclusive Representative no longer enjoys majority support from eligible employees in the unit in question. SECTION5. PROCEDURE FOR DECERTIFICATION OF EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION a. A decertification petition alleging that the incumbent EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION no longer represents a majority of the employees in an established unit may be filed with the Employee Relations Officer. A decertification petition may not be filed within one (1) year after a valid election in which the challenged EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION appeared on the ballot, whether for decertification or certification. A decertification petition may not be filed during the term of a valid Memorandum of Understanding except during the open period preceding the expiration of a Memorandum of Understanding. The open period shall be the thirty (30) day period commencing one hundred fifty (150) days and ending one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of a Memorandum of Understanding. A decertification petition may be filed after a valid Memorandum of Understanding has expired. A valid Memorandum of Understanding shall not serve as a bar to the filing of a decertification petition for more than a three-year period. A decertification petition may be filed by an employee or an employee organization(s), shall be accompanied by proof of employee support, and shall conform to the extent possible to the requirements for a petition for recognition under Section 1 of Article II. b. The Employee Relations Officer shall initially determine whether the decertification petition has been filed in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Resolution. If, in the judgment of the Employee Relations Officer, the decertification petition does not meet the requirements set forth in this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer shall provide written notice to the petitioning employee(s) or employee organization. The petitioning employee(s) or employee organization may either resubmit an amended petition for decertification or may appeal the determination of the Employee Relations Officer pursuant to Article II, Section 8 of this Resolution. If the decertification petition satisfies the requirements of this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer shall so advise the petitioning employee(s) or employee organization and shall give written notice of the petition to the challenged EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION. 9 C. If a decertification petition satisfying the requirements of this Resolution is filed, the Employee Relations Officer shall post notice of election to occur on or about thirty (30) days after notice of the decertification petition is given pursuant to subparagraph (b) hereof, to determine the wishes of unit employees as to representation. A decertification election shall be conducted by secret ballot. The ballot shall offer employees eligible to vote the choice of no representation. Only those regular employees eligible to vote for the certification of an employee organization shall be eligible to vote in a decertification election. If the challenged incumbent EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION does not receive affirmative votes from a majority of the eligible employees voting, that employee organization shall be decertified, and the unit shall not be represented by an employee organization until such time as a new exclusive employee organization is recognized pursuant to this Resolution. d. A petition for decertification of an incumbent EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION may be combined with a petition for certification of a new EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION. A decertification election held pursuant to this Section may be combined with an election for certification of a new EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION held pursuant to Article II Section 4. However, no new exclusive employee organization may be recognized to represent an appropriately designated employee unit unless, by majority vote, the regular employees who vote in said unit, vote to decertify the incumbent EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION. If, pursuant to this Section, a different employee organization is formally certified as the EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION, such organization shall be bound by the terms and conditions of any Memorandum of Understanding then in effect for its remaining term. SECTION 6. POLICY AND STANDARDS FOR DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE UNITS a. The policy objectives in determining the appropriateness of a unit shall be the effect of a proposed unit on (1) the efficient operations of the District and its compatibility with the primary responsibility of the District and its employees to effectively and economically serve the public, and (2) providing employees with effective representation based on recognized community of interest considerations. These policy objectives require that the appropriate unit shall be the broadest feasible grouping of positions that share an identifiable community of interest. Factors to be considered shall be: 1. Similarity of the general kinds of work performed, types of qualifications required, and the general working conditions; 2. History of representation in the District and similar employment; except, however, that no unit shall be deemed to be an appropriate unit solely on 10 the basis of the extent to which employees in the proposed unit have organized; 3. Consistency with the organizational patterns of the District; 4. Number of employees and classifications, and the effect on the administration of employer-employee relations created by the fragmentation of classifications and proliferation of units; 5. Effect on the classification structures and impact on the stability of the employer-employee relationship of dividing a single or related classification(s) among two or more units. b. Further, it is presumed that all non-management employees in all classifications constitute an appropriate unit except for the following: 1. Temporary and contract employees who are hired for a specific duration might not be included in an appropriate unit of full-time and part-time regular employees; and 2. Except to the extent that they are management, supervisory or confidential employees, professional employees may be permitted to vote by classification whether or not they wish to be represented in a unit that includes non-professional employees; professional employees that vote by a majority for inclusion in a unit including non-professional employees shall be so included. C. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, managerial, supervisory and confidential responsibilities, as defined in Section 2 of Article I, are determining factors in establishing appropriate units, and such managerial, supervisory and confidential employees may only be included in units that do not include non-managerial, non-supervisory and non-confidential employees. Managerial, supervisory and confidential employees may not represent any employee organization which represents other employees. d. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, the Employee Relations Officer, after notice to affected employee organizations, may allocate new classifications or positions, delete eliminated classifications or positions, and retain, reallocate or delete modified classifications or positions from units in order to conform with the policy objectives of this Section. 11 SECTION 7. PROCEDURE FOR MODIFICATION OF ESTABLISHED APPROPRIATE UNITS a. Requests by employee organizations for modification of established units represented by an EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION may be considered by the Employee Relations Officer only during the open period specified in Section 5 of Article II, after a Memorandum of Understanding has expired or when such action is deemed consistent with the purposes of this Resolution. Modification requests shall be submitted in the form of a recognition petition and, in addition to the requirements set forth in Section 1 of Article II shall contain a complete statement of all relevant facts and citations in support of the proposed modified unit in terms of the policies and standards contained in Section 6 of Article II. b. The Employee Relations Officer may on his or her own initiative propose that an established unit be modified at any time during which an employee organization is permitted to make such a request. The Employee Relations Officer shall give written notice of the proposed modifications to an affected employee organization and shall hold a meeting concerning the proposed modifications, at which time all affected employee organizations shall be heard. The Employee Relations Officer shall determine the composition of the appropriate unit or units in accordance with Section 6 of Article II and shall give written notice of such determination to the affected employee organizations. The determination of the unit placement of a new classification may be made without regard to the open period specified in Section 5 of Article II. The Employee Relations Officer's determination may be appealed as provided in Section 8 of Article II. SECTION 8. APPEALS FROM RULINGS OF THE EMPLOYEE RELATIONS OFFICER a. An employee organization aggrieved by a determination of the Employee Relations Officer relating to the specific provisions of this Resolution may, within fifteen (15) days of notice of such determination, appeal the determination to the General Manager. b. Appeals to the General Manager shall be filed in writing with the District's Secretary and a copy served on the General Manager and the Employee Relations Officer. The General Manager shall begin to consider the matter within thirty (30) days of the filing of the appeal. The General Manager may, in his or her discretion, refer the dispute to a third party for a hearing and advisory recommendation. The decision of the General Manager on the use of such procedure, and the decision of the General Manager on the resolution of the dispute shall be final and no further administrative appeal shall be allowed. 12 ARTICLE III. ADMINISTRATION SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF CURRENT INFORMATION BY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS a. All changes in the information filed with the District by an EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION under items (a) through (g) of the recognition petition under Section 1 of Article II shall be submitted in writing to the Employee Relations Officer within fourteen (14) days of such change. b. The District shall allow a reasonable number of employee representatives of an EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits when formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the District on matters within the scope of representation. SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PROCEDURES If the meet and confer process has reached impasse as defined in this Resolution, either party may initiate the impasse procedures by filing with the other party a written request for an impasse meeting. The impasse request shall contain a statement of the parties' position on all issues. An impasse meeting shall be scheduled promptly by the Employee Relations Officer. The purpose of such meeting shall be: a. To review the position of the parties in a final effort to reach agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding, and, b. If the impasse is not resolved, to discuss arrangements for the utilization of the impasse procedures provided herein. SECTION 3. IMPASSE PROCEDURES Impasse procedures are as follows: a. If the parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation, and agree on the selection of a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to mediation. The mediation proceedings shall be private. The mediator shall make no public recommendations, nor take any public position at any time concerning the issues. If the parties agree upon mediation, all costs of mediation shall be borne in equal shares by District and by each EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION participating in the mediation. b. If the parties do not agree on mediation or the selection of a mediator, or having so agreed, the impasse has not been resolved, and unless prohibited by law, all issues shall be submitted to the District's Board of Directors for its determination and such action as it, in its discretion, deems to be appropriate in the public 13 interest. The action by the District's Board of Directors shall be final and conclusive. ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION This Resolution shall be administered and construed as follows: a. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to deny to any person, employee, organization, the District or any officer or other representative of the District, the rights, powers and authority granted by Federal or State law. b. This Resolution shall be interpreted so as to carry out its purposes as set forth in Article I. SECTION 2. REPEAL OF PRIOR RESOLUTIONS The provisions of this Resolution shall supersede and take precedence over the provisions of any prior Resolutions, minute orders or statements of policy, by the District's Board of Directors dealing with the same subjects and matters as are covered herein, including, but not limited to Resolution No. 98-34. SECTION3. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Resolution, or the application of such provision to any persons or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Resolution, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION The Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby directed to certify to the passage of this Resolution and thereupon and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. SECTION S. GRANDFATHER CLAUSE District recognizes that the following employee organizations have been elected pursuant to majority vote of the employees in and for the following units: 14 Orange County Employees Association - Administrative and Clerical Unit - Technical Services Unit - Engineering Unit International Union of Operating - Operations, Maintenance and General Engineers, Local 501 Services Unit Supervisory and Professional - Supervisory Management Unit Management Group - Professional Unit District grants Exclusive Recognition to such employee organizations for said units until such status is changed pursuant to this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this day of , 19_ Chairman, Board of Directors Secretary, Board of Directors 15 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT May 25, 1999, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom at the OCWD offices at 5:30 a.m. on May 25, 1999. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors John Collins, Vice Chairman, Norman Eckenrode, Peer Swan, and General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alternate;OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony, and Iry Pickler, Chairman; and OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr., Alternate. Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. was not present. Staff attending were Tom Dawes, GWR System Project Manager; OCSD staff. Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman,Jim Herberg Planning Manager, David Ludwin Director of Engineering, Director of Operations and Maintenance Bob Ooten, Director of Finance Gary Streed; OCWD staff: Associate General Managers Steve Conklin and John Kennedy, Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth, Public Affairs Specialist Cindy Gehman, Administrative Assistant Jill Everhart, and Assistant District Secretary Janice Durant. Others in attendance included OCWD Directors Was Bannister,Jerry King and Kelly Rowe; Bill Everest, Boyle Engineering;Bob Finn, Brown& Caldwell; Kelli Burn- Lucht and Dick Cormeille, CDM; Steve Tedesco, ASL; Bruce Mowry, CH2M Hill;Mike Rudimica, RBF; Bob Getter, Parsons; Denise Coleman, Haley& Aldrich; Dave Argo, Black& Veatch;Ryan McLean, Psomas& Associates; Steve Hough, Carollo Engineers. OCWD Public information Officer Ron Wildermuth played a short videotaped clip of a GWR System story that appeared last week on the OCN channel. 1. Minutes of previous meeting Director Collins noted that the May 3 minutes reflected an incorrect date for the Mayors' Breakfast at Fountain Valley Hospital which was held May 27. The minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held May 3, 1999 were then approved as corrected upon motion by Director Collins,seconded by Director Anthony and carried, with Director Swan abstaining as he was not present at the meeting. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Actions on Phase 3 of Public Information Program GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes recalled that at its May 3 meeting, the Committee selected Nelson Communications Group to conduct the Phase 3 Public Information Program and directed staff to finalize a contract accordingly. He presented staffs recommendation for issuance of a Task Order to Nelson Communications in the amount of$204,895, explaining that staff has increased Nelson's original proposal amount of$199,895 by$5,000 for media training. Mr. Dawes explained that the Task Order to Nelson also contains$15,000 for the Crisis Communication Plan and he requested Committee approval to issue that portion of the Task Order along with the$5,000 portion for media training immediately since it will take some time for approval of the entire Task Order by both Boards. The following action was then taken. Upon motion by Director Swan,seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the Committee recommended that the Boards authorize issuance of a Task Order(Professional Service Agreement)to Nelson Communications Group in the amount of$204,995 for the GWR System Phase 3 Public Information Program; and the OCWD General Manager is authorized to immediately issue a portion of such Task Order in the amount of$20,000 for media training and the Crisis Communication Plan. 2. GWR System Project Development Phase Mr. Dawes described staffs proposal review process and presented its recommendations for issuance of Task Orders for the GWR System Project Development Phase to: 1) Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. for$4,810,300; 2) Separation Processes, Inc. for$403,280; and 3)R. Nelson for $53,000. The Committee requested additional information prior to making a recommendation in this regard, and the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Collins and carried,the Committee scheduled a workshop for discussion of this item at 7:30 a.m. on June 16, at either OCWD or OCSD depending on conference room availability. (It was noted that the Committee will take no action regarding this issue at this meeting; a formal recommendation by the Committee to the joint Boards will be taken at the regularly scheduled June 22 GWR System Committee meeting.) 4. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following matters: A. A second article by Bill Borden that appeared in the Orange County Register regarding the GWR System written after his meetings with Wes Bannister and John Collins. B. A second draft of GWR System Newsletter was distributed to the Committee with a request for comments. C. GWR System briefing and tour on Friday, May 28 for Congressmember Loretta Sanchez. 5. Report of General Managers OCWD General Manager Mills reported on a GWR System presentation that he and Iry Pickler gave to the Anaheim City Council on Tuesday, May 18. 2 OCSD General Manager McIntyre reported on a Southern California Water Alliance meeting held last week in which a wastewater bond issuance was discussed. 6. Directors Comments Director Eckenrode requested that the joint staffs meet to delineate responsibilities for the GWA System project. Mr. Dawes advised that a draft agreement regarding operational issues is forthcoming. ADJOURNMENT The Committee adjourned at 6:45 p.m. The next meeting of the Joint GWR System Committee is scheduled for 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 16, 1999, at 7:30 a.m. at either OCWD or OCSD depending on conference room availability. 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To BE.ofoir. 6/73/99 AGENDA REPORT Iem Number it,mS'NCmEe Orange County Sanitation District r ) FROM: Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for engineering services for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $4,810,300, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the amount of$2,405,150; (2) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Separation Processes, Inc., for engineering services for Job No. J-36 for an amount not to exceed $403,280, with the Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the amount of $201,640; and (3) Approve issuance of a Professional Services Agreement with Carl R. Nelson for professional services for Job No. J-36, in an amount not to exceed $53,000, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the amount of $26,500. SUMMARY The recommended action is being forwarded to the Board of Directors from the Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on June 21, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached Budget Information Table BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Water Management Projects, a) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) N1ny.GuW1)3RAaibraY'b ar.oro�awp.w IXc n....a vmae Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Refer to the attached Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Agenda Report dated June 22, 1999. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost-effective alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal JDH:gc wevy.ee�enN�xsneiee,a4as a,.pmLemynaw.a« R—. B2y99 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO THIS AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURETO EXPENDEDTO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%) Project Development E 70Q000 E 700,000 E 700,000 E 553,3a5 E 553.345 E 400,900 72% Design Staff E 2,3 .= S 2,349000 E 2,349,Oo0 E 2.349.000 $ 2,3I9," $ 180,000 6% Design Consultant PSAs E 7,500,000 $ 7,SOO.M E 7,500000 E 2.633,290 $ 2,633.290 EConstructioner) E 2,653,900 6 2,653.900 E 2,653,900 E S ff S 9345600 S 9,345,600 E 9,345,E00 S E ract E 66,461,500 S 86.481.500 b 66,481.500 E S S 12,69s.o00 S 12,695.000 E 12,695,000 S S E 121,925.DDO E 121925." $ - S 121,925,000 E 2,902,345 S 2.633,290 E 5,535,635 $ Sao." 10% Hw ftWngV aCCNT6 TSV3%-39WWETTP Eaaoia ]@m AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: June 21, 1999 Budgeted: Yes Program/Line Item No.: 9014030-600.70-01 To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Cost Estimate: $4.5 to $5 Million System Cooperative Committee General Counsel Approval: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. Project Report Approved: Yes Donald F. McIntyre CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: GWR SYSTEM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY For many months the Committee has worked on the development and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Project Development phase of the GWR System. In April, the RFP was released and proposals received on May 12. Interviews were held with the proposing teams on May 19. On June 16, your Committee conducted a workshop on a recommendation by the staff Proposal Review Team to award a contract for the work to a team headed by Camp Dresser McKee, Inc. Also included are recommendations for award of contracts for two specialty services contracts. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Recommend approval of task order (Professional Services Agreement) with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,810,300 for Project Development phase. 2. Recommend approval of Specialty Services Task Order with Separation Processes, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $403,280. 3. Approve issuance of Specialty Services Task Order with Carl R. Nelson, in an amount not to exceed $53,000. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS Staff issued RFPs to 36 firms, most of which looked for an opportunity to align with a major project team. Proposals were received from the four teams on May 12'", and all were interviewed on May 191" by a seven-member staff Proposal Review Team. The review team, consisting of three staff members each from OCSD and OCWD plus an outside member, met to develop rating criteria and procedures. The staff Proposal e Project Development June 21, 1999 Page 2 of 4 Review Team recommends award of a task order to Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) in an amount not to exceed $4,810,300. Team Fee Proposal Boyle, Carollo and Black & Veatch $5,486 000 Camp Dresser& McKee, Brown & Caldwell and ASL $4,810,300 CH2M Hill, RBF and Psomas $4,291 286 Parsons Engineering Science Montgomery Watson and Lee & Ro $4,088 249 STAFF SELECTION PROCESS The seven-member staff proposal review team consisted of the following individuals. OCWD OCSD Tom Dawes, Project Manager Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Kennedy, Planning Director Jim Herberg, Planning Manager Steve Conklin, Engineering Director Bob Dolan, Director of 0&M Jim Williams, former County of Orange Design Manager The staff Proposal Review Team held several meetings to develop and approve an evaluation procedure, which resulted in the following rating guidelines: Item Weiaht General 15% Project Management 20% Team Evaluation 20% Technical Evaluation 20% Strategy/Innovation 25% Total 100% These major categories had 77 subcategories, all designed to help the reviewer understand and compare the proposal and the scope of work, but not designed to reduce the evaluation procedure to a mathematical exercise. Each reviewer read the proposals by Monday noon, May 17" and supplied the project manager with questions they thought could best be addressed in the interview. Those questions were sent to the teams Monday afternoon. Separately, a briefing of certain technical areas and how they were addressed in the proposal was made to the review team by OCWD technical staff. Project Development June 21, 1999 Page 3 of 4 The CDM team is completing the OCSD Strategic Plan and through the development of that master plan became intimately familiar with the goals and vision of the GWR System. CDM has worked around the world on similar projects and together with their partners, Brown and Caldwell, and ASl Consulting Engineers, have done many projects for both OCWD and OCSD. BACKGROUND The Project Development Phase is a preliminary design (30-40% design) effort to accomplish the following tasks: • Determine exact location of wells and pipelines so that right-of-ways, permits and permit conditions can be secured. • Determine exact size and location of AWT and pumping facilities, so that equipment and other constraints can be identified. • Determine certain power issues, so that power purchase contracts can be negotiated. • Refine cost data. • Prepare material and construction specifications. • Prepare facilities "theme" and building renderings. The Project Development work would not design the project. All of the above work is necessary to proceed with the design under a traditional Design-Bid-Build Contract. The Project Development work should also be sufficient to proceed with contract award for all or portions under a Design-Build Contract. The Project Development phase includes five (5) major work tasks. The Scope of Work is written in a format that a selected team of consultants would do all tasks, which include: Preliminary design of Seawater Intrusion Barrier Facilities Preliminary design of Advanced Water Treatment Facilities Preliminary design of influent and effluent pumping facilities Preliminary design of pipeline along the Santa Ana River Preparation of final specifications and standard drawings Project Development June 21, 1999 Page 4 of 4 SPECIALTY SERVICES CARL R. NELSON is a retired Chief Engineer of the Orange County Environmental Management Agency and was instrumental in obtaining Army Corps of Engineering funding and improvements on the Santa Ana River. We will use Mr. Nelson's services to assist with permitting the project along the Santa Ana River with the Army Corps of Engineers, county, all cities, Caltrans and railroads. In addition, he will assist in right-of-way issues with the county. Mr. Nelson proposes a fee of $85/hour with a $53,000 cap. SEPARATION PROCESSES, headed by Dr. Dick Sudak, has the most experience in Southern California in membrane technology. We will use Dr. Sudak's services in an overview capacity in the preparation of P&D drawings, layout and specifications for the microfilters, reverse osmosis and utraviolet disinfection facilities. He will provide the design for the basic unit (3 mgd). His proposal in an amount not to exceed $403,280 is based on hourly rates. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS The committee approved earlier schedules that did not include a separate Project Development phase. The Project Development Phase was discussed with the committee at the September, October and November 1998 regular meetings. Authority to solicit proposals was given on April 13, 1999. The Committee discussed this action on May 25 and conducted a workshop on June 16, 1999. CATEMPWroje De apmmt.A BOARD OF DIRECTORS Needn9 Drt To Bd.of Or. d6/23/99 AGENDA REPORT item Number Item Num1w 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Authorize circulation of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan for public comment in compliance with CEQA requirements; 2) Authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; 3) Fix July 21, 1999 at 7:00 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan; and, 4) Establish August 16, 1999 as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan. SUMMARY Since 1989, the District has been operating under the 1989 Master Plan Program Environmental Impact Report. The recently completed Strategic Plan developed a revised operational plan and capital improvement program through 2020. A draft program EIR has been prepared for the Strategic Plan as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On June 19, 1999 a workshop was held to review the Draft program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Strategic Plan. Copies of the Draft EIR Executive Summary were distributed to Board members at the workshop. District Staff and the EIR consultant team presented an overview of the document focusing on impacts that were found to be significant and measures that will be taken to mitigate those impacts. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) M Mql Spell MAp Rry 11MB Ap RepwbY6pPtlAm tell Rl d Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following is a overview of the Strategic Plan EIR process: Circulation of Notice of Preparation October 1997 Advisory Committee (PAC 2)Workshop June 17, 1999 Board Workshop June 19, 1999 Board Authorization for Circulation of Draft EIR June 23, 1999 Draft EIR Public Review Period June 29—August 16, 1999 Public Hearing July 21, 1999 Final EIR Publication October 4, 1999 EIR Certification October 27, 1999 In October 1997, a notice of preparation was distributed to over 400 public agencies and interested parties to solicit input on specific concerns to be included in the scope of the EIR studies. Forty comment letters were received. These comments were reviewed by Staff and the EIR consultant team and incorporated into the Draft EIR, with other information necessary to comply with CEOA. Two citizen advisory committees, the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) and the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC), were formed during the strategic planning process to provide input on engineering alternatives for managing peak flows and for establishing a new rate structure. These two committees have been combined into PAC 2 to provide continued public involvement through the completion of the Strategic Plan. On June 17, the PAC 2 was briefed on the Draft EIR impacts and proposed mitigation measures. On June 19, an informational workshop was held for the Board of Directors to review the Draft EIR with emphasis on policy decisions related to the preferred alternative. Copies of the EIR executive summary were distributed at the Board Workshop. Pending the Board's authorization to circulate the Draft EIR, the public review period will be from June 29 through August 16. State law requires a minimum 45-day public review period. At the end of the review period, a response will be prepared for every comment received. The comments and responses will be published in the Final EIR, scheduled for publication in October 1999. The Board will have the opportunity to review the public comments prior to considering certification of the EIR at its October 27 regular meeting. ALTERNATIVES Not approving circulation of Draft EIR. If circulation of the Draft EIR is not authorized, new projects identified by the Strategic Plan that were not included in the 1989 Master Plan EIR will not be able to move forward. These projects would be delayed and incur additional costs for preparation of individual EIRs or Negative Declarations. RM .1ed.ReWN116W 6u �peMe ReywM1W9BMmm1B6A R-n � Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS Board certification of the Strategic Plan Final EIR is scheduled for October 1999. ATTACHMENTS None x'.n.emme .m.m Mem.nw�suwa eum new.xepunmea:em ie au Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date TG Bd.of Dr. 6/2 1999 AGENDA REPORT ttem MGm a rt'A NGm e ao Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud . , irector of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: HUNTINGTON BEACH SEWER AND ABANDONMENT, CONTRACT NO. 11-23 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Matthew and Stewart Co., Inc., for Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, for an amount not to exceed $129,796.00. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-23, were completed in April 1999. This project was designed by DGA Consultants, Inc. Contract No. 11-23 provides for the abandonment of an aged, damaged and maintenance intensive sewer in Pacific Coast Highway. The plans and specifications for this project, Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment, Contract No. 11-23, were bid on June 10, 1999. Project Budget $370,000 Construction Budget $150,000 Engineer's Estimate $140,000 Low Responsible Bid $129,796 High Bid $208,999 Number of Bids 5 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The construction budget for Contract No. 11-23 is $150,000. The original engineers estimate for construction is $140,000. This budget request authorizes $129,796.00 for the construction contract, plus $2,500 for other construction such as cost of city permits, etc., and $42,000 for the total estimated cost for staff inspection and construction management. GNpjapiM1OpV4aGM Heys NBps lI-M I-23MW 23"W B.wee:a,Gn, Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted, (1998-99 Budget Capital Projects Zone 11, line g) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Huntington Beach sewer was originally constructed in 1950 by the City of Huntington Beach. Orange County Sanitation District purchased the sewer in August 1960. The entire sewer was televised and an inspection report was prepared in December 1998. The inspection report indicated sags and cracks in the main line with a large amount of water infiltration. Abandonment of this sewer is possible because of the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer that was built in 1990, that now serves as the main trunk sewer for the entire area. Existing sewer laterals will be reconnected to a new 8-inch sewer and connected to the Coast Trunk Sewer. By abandoning this sewer, the District will eliminate repair and maintenance costs. ALTERNATIVES There are no other cost-effective alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption was filed on April 8, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation RLC:jak tt obaladarat WglobalAgenda Draft ReportWoint ItuardsN t-23N t-23 AR 0062399.dot G 110.11,nda Drali Red W—1 ewm:n ni],I 1.23 AnO 23Nd. adm,m: wMe Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment Contract No. 11-23 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project De el meet $ 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,200 84% Desi n Staff $ 90,500 $ 90,500 $ 90,500 $ 90,500 $ 90,500 $ 25,180 28% Consultant PSA $ 22.000 $ 22,000 $ 22.000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 14,400 65% Construction Contract $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 129,796 $ 129.796 0% Constucton Other $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ - $ 2,500 $ 2,500 0% Construction Staff $ 42,000 $ 42.000 $ 42,000 $ - $ 42.000 $ 42,000 0% Confingency $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ $ 0% TOTAL 1 $ 370.0001 $ 370.000 1 $ - 1 $ 370,000 $ 117,500 Is 174296 $ 291,796 $ 43,780 159/6 Rhq.d aWgUobs CanbacHM-23 Budget Table a 1 - ; June 10, 1999 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 0 BID TABULATION HUNTINGTON BEACH SEWER AND ABANDONMENT CONTRACT NO. 11-23 Engineer's Estimate: $140,000 Construction Contract Budget: $150,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Matthew & Stewart Co., Inc. $ 129,796.00 2. Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. $ 156,743.00 3. Savala Construction Co., Inc. $ 181,587.00 4. Steve Casada Construction $ 192,440.00 5. Paulus Engineering $ 208,999.00 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to MATTHEW & STEWART CO., INC. in the bid amount of$129,796aW7 bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering \Vadon\datal\wp.dta\engUOBS&CONTRACTSU 1-23\it-23 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05119198 OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS rx�ngDae To ad.orar. 06iz3i 9 AGENDA REPORT HrrnNumbe llm2Ym6P n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Mullins, Engineer SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR TREATMENT PLANT NOS. 1 & 2, JOB NO. J-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, on file at the Office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, pursuant to bid tabulation, in an amount to be determined at the time of award. SUMMARY 1. Additional generators are needed at the Plant 2 Headworks to be prepared for a possible loss of utility and central generation power. Although Job No. J-33-1 would install these standby generators next year as part of the planned project, the installation is being expedited to have them in place for the end of the year. 2. An agenda item was approved at the May Board meeting authorizing Staff to negotiate and purchase the generator systems and associated electrical equipment for an amount not to exceed $1,300,000. This equipment is now being ordered and delivery is expected in mid-October 1999. 3. This Construction Contract will provide a permanent standby power building and install the prepurchased equipment items, and all necessary related work. The contract requires that an operational facility be completed by December 1, 1999. 4. The Notice Inviting Bids for the Construction Contract was advertised on June 8,1999. The bids were opened on June 22, 1999 (after this report was mailed). The Director of Engineering will provide a full verbal report to the Board at the June 23, 1999 meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The construction budget for Job No. J-33-1 is $9,240,000. The engineer's estimate for this portion of the work is $650,000. Construction support and staff budget costs will be $200,000. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 4.c, Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not install generators this year under Job No. J-33-1. Instead, lease generators (if available) for an estimated cost of$450,000. 2. Keep the existing trailer-mounted generators at the Headworks and risk having inadequate standby power for cuffall pumping. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the previously approved programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The Master Plan was prepared by Carollo Engineers-Boyle Engineering, Joint Venture. Jones & Stokes prepared the EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989. The Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENT Budget Information Table and Bid Tabulation will be available at the Board meeting. JCM:jo:jak H:kwp.dla\agenderBoard Agenda Reports\l999 Board Agenda Repods`06g9Wem 21.doc Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Wiling Dnfe T0 6/73/998d.of Dr. AGENDA REPORT Iem NumEv rlm rvllmhP u Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-09 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-09, Adopting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges: a. Receive and File Staff Report b. Verbal report of General Counsel C. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-09 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) d. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-09, and pass to second reading and public hearing on July 21, 1999. SUMMARY See attached Staff Report dated June 16, 1999, and Memorandum from General Counsel dated June 17, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A M Yp UdVpwWe1B„eN Ap Re %IM RepmY`O nC¢ Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel Staff Report Ordinance No. OCSD-09 N My.Ebgpw9��aN/penEa Re{w4\iB6B&uN I.peMc RepaG`�WMm]3.tloc ReNW: a Page 2 June 16,1999 STAFF REPORT Capacity Facilities Capacity Charges (Connection Fees) Capital facilities capacity charges, or connection fees for short, have been one-time fees collected in order to cover the costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve the property. Today, connection fees are collected for the District by member cities and sanitary districts when building permits are issued. These fees were revisited as a part of the Rate Advisory Committee's (RAC) work for the Strategic Plan. The RAC did not develop a specific connection fee calculation method, but did give staff guidelines in several areas: • The existing calculation method should be changed. • There should be different residential fees to reflect different impacts. • The economic and social benefits of commercial/industrial development should be considered. • Collection methods besides "one-time, up-front" should be considered. • Costs of facilities related to wet-weather flows should be shared on the basis of wet- weather flow increases. • New users should pay for new capacity. Subsequent to the RAC process, staff and the Strategic Plan consultants worked to develop a capital facilities capacity charge program that satisfied the RAC concerns, was fair to existing and future users, reflected differing demands on the sewerage system and satisfied the District's need for future funds. A workshop was held for all Directors, the FAHR Committee considered several alternatives and the Board reviewed, and reached consensus on, the FAHR Committee proposal in order to issue a "Proposition 218 Notice". Existing Program The existing method of calculation was developed as a part of the 1989 Master Plan, also called the 2020 VISION Master Plan. Future users are charged their share of all facilities, both existing and future, that will be in place in 2020 as if all facilities and all users came into the system on that date. This calculation method is sometimes called the "capital investment equalization method". If the value of all the facilities is projected to be $2,360,000,000, and the total number of users is projected to be 1,000,000, then the connection fee is $2,360. One of the most significant assumptions in 1989 was that the non-residential use factor per 1,000 square feet of building is 20% of single-family residential use. This results in a current non-residential connection fee of$472 ($2,350 x 20%) per 1,000 square feet in this example. This calculation method can also be described as "all users, past, present and future, pay the same." Connection Fee Alternatives Page 2 of 7 May 3, 1999 RAC Program The RAC recommended that capital costs be categorized and that different user types pay for different categories of costs. Cost categories were developed for existing net assets, additional dry weather capacity, additional wet weather capacity, improved treatment and rehabilitation/reconstruction. The following table explains the allocation of these cost categories to user groups. Cost Category Allocation of Costs • Existing Assets Less Debt • Current users have paid for support facilities, etc; all new users will also pay a share • Dry Weather Capacity • All new users will pay • Wet Weather Capacity • New residential and new non- residential users will pay based upon comparative length of sewers within each group • Improved Treatment • Current and new users will pay • Rehab/Reconstruction • Current and new users will pay By leaving the existing assets cost category out of this calculation, this allocation method can be changed to one best described as, "all users from now on pay the same," and/or as, 'future users will only pay for future capacity." Significant Changes Several things have changed since the 1989 adoption of the "2020 VISION Master Plan" that impact the calculation of connection fees. The Strategic Plan proposed a capital improvement plan through 2020 that is approximately equal to the "2020 Vision" projects, but there are 10 fewer years in the planning horizon. The planned daily flow for a single-family residence, or an equivalent dwelling unit, has been reduced, based upon experience and metering, from 399 gallons to 260 gallons. The total average daily flow into the plants at 2020 has been reduced from 399,000,000 to 352,000,000 gallons. The total number of equivalent dwelling units that are projected to be connected in 2020 has therefore increased from 1,000,000 to 1,354,000. However, the change that has the most impact on non-residential connection fees, is that the average daily flow per 1,000 square feet has been calculated at 150 gallons per day, rather than the 80 gallons per day that had been assumed historically. This change alone would result in a near doubling of the non-residential connection fee. Alternatives Several methods of implementing the RAC recommendations were evaluated by staff and reviewed by the FAHR Committee and other Directors. Connection Fee Alternatives Page 3 of 7 May 3, 1999 User Fee Basis -With the intention of developing consistency between the flow and strength based user fee program and connection fees, connection fees were calculated based upon the flow, BOD and SS assumptions used to determine user fees. (BOD, biochemical oxygen demand, and SS, microscopic suspended solids, are common measurements of wastewater strength.) This method resulted in 30 separate rates per 1,000 square feet of development. Summary User Fee Basis —Fees were first computed per 1,000 sq. ft. of development as above. Those uses with reasonably close fees were then combined and consolidated. The number of different rates was reduced from 30 to 15. Average Use Basis - There are generally only two sizes of commercial laterals. They are determined principally by ease of cleaning, and they are established by building codes. These facts support a minimum number of rates because the maximum use from most developments would be approximately the same. Potential maximum use is the basis for our current connection fee structure and results in the same rate as average use. Master Plan Land Use Basis - The master plan or strategic plan process predicts future flows and future capacity requirements based upon land use. Cities and counties adopt land use plans for future developments within their spheres of influence. Each of these land uses is assigned a flow coefficient per acre. Proposed Basis Staff and consultants reviewed and reconsidered each of the alternatives in the light of the comments by the FAHR Committee, the City of Anaheim, other Directors and District staff. A proposal was developed which takes the best from the various other alternatives and retains consistency with the current calculation method. The base fee is proposed to continue to be calculated on the "capital investment equalization method." Total capital costs of 2020 will be allocated to all projected users at 2020 to calculate the base fee. Differences in non-residential use per 1,000 square feet will be accommodated in two ways: Rates will be adopted for very low uses such as warehouses and parking structures; and rates will be adopted for very high uses, such as restaurants and car washes. Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, those requiring Class I, or Class Il, permits from our Source Control Division, may pay an ongoing capital charge on their quarterly invoices K their individual actual discharge exceeds the average allowed in the base connection fee. This proposal is easy for the local agencies to administer, recognizes that not all users place the same demand on the system, recognizes that the exact use of a property is often unknown when building permits are issued, acknowledges that most users have similar demands, and reduces the significant up-front charges faced by a large user. Connection Fee Alternatives Page 4 of 7 May 3, 1999 Reduced Up-Front Payments Connection fees based upon potential flow and strength can be significant for certain users. The up-front, one-time fee for a food processing plant that relocated to Orange County recently could have been $1.4 million based upon a projected ultimate flow of 150,000 gallons a day and a combined 1,700 pounds of BOD and SS. The proposal is for these Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, SIUs or Class I or Class 11, Pernitees, to pay a base connection fee per 1,000 square feet of building. This base fee will allow them to discharge an average quantity and strength of wastewater. For use above this average, a fee per gallon or per pound would be added to their quarterly invoice for use, which will continue to be based upon actual flow and strength. In this way, accurate impacts and uses are established as the basis for the capital facilities capacity charge, cash flow matches production for the business, up- front costs are minimized, fees stop if the business moves or quits and increased use in the future generates additional "connection fee" revenues. In order to compensate the District for the lost up-front funds and to provide for the "time value of money," an interest component will be included in the rates per gallon and pound. Tiered Residential Fees The RAC recommended that residential connection fees be tiered to reflect differing demands on the sewerage system. One of the best ways to predict sewer use is by the number of bedrooms because that correlates to the number of potential occupants. Additionally, adding a bedroom requires a building permit and would trigger additional connection fees. Consultants and staff analyzed census data and Assessor's Office data to determine the mix of bedrooms in the single-family residential (SFR) and multi- family residential (MFR) service area to determine the standard bedroom size for each, as well as the number of existing and projected units. The result of this analysis is shown below assuming that the MFR average daily flow is 70% of the SFR flow, the same assumption used in determining user fees. No. of Bedrooms SFR Ratio MFR Ratio 0 .327 1 .615 .508 2 .808 .700 3 1.000 .890 4 1.192 1.084 5 1.385 Connection Fee Alternatives Page 5 of 7 May 3, 1999 Credit for Demolished Structures For many years, the connection fee ordinance has allowed credit for structures demolished up to two years prior to issuance of new building permit. The credit is determined to be an amount equal to the current connection fee for the demolished structure. Thus, if 25 single-family homes were demolished and replaced with 75 single-family homes, the developer would only be required to purchase 50 new permits. This credit is allowed whether or not connection fees were ever paid, and regardless of the amount of connection fees actually paid. (In no event is a refund ever granted.) Recently, two separate developers have challenged the two-year period. The basic argument put forth by the lawyers for each of these developers is that the previous buildings paid for the capacity they used, either through connection fees or property taxes. Connection fees in this area, formerly District No. 2, were adopted in 1973 at $50 per 1.000 square feet. Prior to passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, each District also levied a separate property tax for capital improvements. The other view is that sewage treatment facilities are planned and constructed based upon flow trends and demands. When a building is demolished, flows decrease. After some reasonable period, planners need to be able to know that the flow decrease is '.permanent," and that future capacity needs will be met through connection fees. The Directors considered four options and listened to a presentation from one of the affected developers and propose to modify the current policy. The proposal removes the two-year provision and provides, instead, that any new replacement building would not be required to pay any capital facility capacity charge so long as the new use was no more than the previous demand. In the case of increased demand, a fee would be charged only for the increase. Reduced Fee for Low Income or Senior Citizen Developments From time to time, the Directors have been asked to consider reducing or waiving the connection fee for various projects deemed socially desirable. Most often these are projects for senior citizens or to provide low-cost housing. It has not been uncommon for various other agencies to waive their fees for these projects. Nonetheless, the Directors have not granted these requests in the past. In the tiered residential connection fee described above, the connection fee for a one- bedroom unit would already be one-half of the standard three-bedroom single-family rate, while a studio apartment would be about one-third. The tiered residential connection fee should serve to satisfy the demand for reduced fees for these special types of developments. Governmental Uses Historically, local governmental agency buildings have not been charged a connection fee. (They do pay annual user fees.) These uses include county facilities, public Connection Fee Alternatives Page 6 of 7 May 3, 1999 schools, city halls, fire stations, police stations, etc. Revenue Area 13 has been an exception in which all of these uses are charged connection fees. State and federal buildings are charged for connection fees in all Revenue Areas. The proposed Ordinance removes the exemption for local agencies. All users will now be required to pay a capital facilities capacity charge that reflects their demand upon the sewerage facilities. When a local agency is charged a connection fee, the funds are ultimately provided by the local taxpayers. Thus, the people who benefit from the service pay the fees. When a regional facility is charged a connection fee, it must raise the funds from its own service area, which could be broader than the OCSD Revenue Area affected. Charging governmental agencies removes an indirect subsidy that could now be the basis for finding the charge to be invalid as not meeting the requirements of Proposition No. 218. Recommendations Staff recommends the adoption of a new comprehensive capital facilities capacity charge ordinance which contains the following elements. 1. Base fees will be determined by type of development and are calculated per 1,000 square feet of building area for non-residential development and per unit for residential development. 2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees will be developed: low demand, average demand and high demand. The attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule shows the rates for each category and a comparison with other agencies. 3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I and Class II Permittees) will be charged demand-based capital facilities capacity charges as a part of their on-going annual use charge billings, rather than only as a one-time up-front charge. These charges will include an interest component. The attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule shows the rates per gallon and per pound that would be charged for additional demand. 4. Residential fees will be tiered based upon number of bedrooms for SFR and MFR development. 5. Credit for demolished structures will be granted in an amount equal to the fee calculated today for the demolished structure, without regard for the time between demolition and new building permits. 6. Connection fees will continue to be charged for state and federal facilities. Connection fees will begin to be charged for city, county and regional facilities and for all school buildings. Table 1 Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Single Family Residential 5+ Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $2,530 4 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $2.165 3 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1.820 2 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1,475 1 Bedrooms Per SFR Unit $1.130 Multi-Family Residential 4+Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1.965 3 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1,620 2 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $1,275 1 Bedrooms Per MFR Unit $910 Studio Per MFR Unit $580 Commercial and Industrial Low Facilities Demand 1,000 sq feel $110 Average Facilities Demand 1.000 sq feet $675 High Facilities Demand 1,000 sq feet $1,600 Low Facilities Demand High Facilities Demand Churches Amusement Parks Lumber/Constr.Yards Car Washes Nurseries(plants) Coin Laundry Parking Structures Restaurants RV Parks Shopping Ctr w/Restaurant RV Storage Supermarkets Schools Truck Terminals Warehouses The base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for High Facilities Demand is established at$1,600, but shall be incrementally increased from the current rate in five steps at five intervals as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $675 Effective January 1, 2000 $900 Effective July 1, 2000 $1.130 Effective January 1, 2001 $1,360 Effective July 1, 2001 $1,600 G',1axwl.dt8lfin/21 Owreeftld d wpy1STRATPI-Wonn fee sch 623 6/16/1999 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-04 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a management report, including financial and system facilities needs of the District, and wishes to reaffirm the policy of the District of imposing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly conned to the District's system or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or"fees" to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed; and, B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989", hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, identifying the required future development of District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District's service areas; and, C. That the District has undertaken, commencing in 1997, a comprehensive update and revision of the Master Plan, which revisions are scheduled for completion in the Year 2000, to thereafter be known as the 'Strategic Plan"; and D. That the District, in 1997, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in TWpill0san:o-s:0rv1 7199 1 the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system; and E. That a final report, based upon studies and reports of District's engineering and financial advisors, and an extensive evaluation by an Advisory Committee of industrial, commercial, and residential users of the system (the "Rate Advisory Committee"), has been prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors to assist and guide it in its considerations for the adoption of this Ordinance (the "Determination of Financial Rates and Charges Report"); and F. That the Report has been made available to the public and has been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of law; and, G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and, H. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal system facilities; that the costs of owning, operating, and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and, I. That the connection fees imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer system facilities and service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Constitution Article XIIID; and, J That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District; and K That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: TLw:pjxr 05-477:ae:0&17199 2 Section 1: Definitions 1.1 "Actual construction costs' include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. 1.2 "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge' means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, as provided for in Section 6 of this Ordinance, is a one-time charge, a portion of which is payable over a period of time. 1.3 "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including, but not limited to installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines and appurtenances to make the connection, that does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. 1.4 "Nondiscriminatory means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. 1.5 "Predecessor Districts" means former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, which jointly owned and administered the property and sewerage system facilities of the District, which consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District, as a single entity, effective July 1, 1998. 1.6 "Public agency means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county, city, district, school district, public authority, or any other political subdivision or public corporation of this Slate. Section 2: Connection Permits: Reguired. A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage TLw:pp105477:D-S:ON17199 3 { facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. B. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit, or provides a written waiver of this requirement to the District. There will be a Nondiscriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3: Caoital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be issued until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said properly. Section 4: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. 4.1 Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. 4.2 Upon application of any property seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health& Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 5: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth in Table 1. TLW:pj:p105477:D-S:OrV17199 4 TABLE 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial— Industrial 1,000 square feet Low Demand 1,000 square feet $ 110 Average Demand 1,000 square feet $ 675 High Demand 1,000 square feet $1,600/ Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910 Studio Per Unit $ 580 Section 6: Additional Caoital Facilities Caoacity Cheraw Significant Industrial Users. In addition to the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, based upon each 1,000 square feet of building area for commercial — industrial use category properties, all users that are required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit or Special Purpose Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. 1 The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at $1,600, but shall be incrementally increased from the present amount at rive(5) levels, and five (5)time periods as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675 Effective January 1,2000 $ 900 Effective July 1,2000 $1,130 Effective January 1,2001 $1,360 Effective July 1,2001 $1,600 A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 'Low Demand connections are the following categories of users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches;Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards. "High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants; Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries;Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants. " All other connections are Average demand users. TLw:pl l t 06177:10-5:015/17t9a 5 OCSD-01, Article 3, due to having regulated or significant discharges, shall pay a daily charge for each gallon of flow or pound of Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD') or Suspended Solids ("SS") above the base use discharge maximums included in the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amounts as set forth below. The base use discharge maximums are 25,000 gallons per day, or 150 pounds each of BOO and SS. Daily Fee Flow Portion Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOO Portion Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Portion Pounds Per Day $0.16025 This additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, based upon flow and strength above the average allowed with the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, shall be charged to the user on its quarterly invoice for the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges (User Charge), as provided by District Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Section 7: Capital Facilities Caoacitv Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 8: Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table 1, less a credit amount equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table 1 for the prior category of use. Section 9: Payment of Caoital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3 and 4 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. TLw:pjx105477:D-5 a07i99 6 Section 10: No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other property. Section 11 : Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations. Section 12: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 13 : Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect September 1, 1999. Section 14: Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-04 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 15 : Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two- thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, District Counsel TLW P1*1 O50 :D-5,Wl7199 BOARD OF DIRECTORS rkenng Dx To Bd.or Dir. e/z3roB AGENDA REPORT """" ""' loon 23 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SUSPENDING THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGE ORDINANCE WHILE A NEW ONE IS BEING ADOPTED GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-10, Temporarily Suspending the Provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-04 re Capital Facilities Connection Charges. SUMMARY As a part of the Strategic Plan the Board has been considering a revised capital facilities capacity charge, sometimes referred to as a connection fee. Tonight the Board will introduce a new Ordinance that will result in reduced charges in many instances. Because the Ordinance adoption process has so many time constraints, the reduced fee will not be "official" until September 1, 1999. The Directors, at an April 10, 1999 workshop and at the June 9, 1999 FAHR Committee meeting, have expressed a desire to implement the reduced fees during the enactment process. General Counsel has advised that this resolution is required in order to authorize the Board's desire. If approved, this resolution will temporarily suspend the current Ordinance. The proposed Ordinance will repeal the existing Ordinance on September 1, 1999. Capital facilities capacity charges collected between June 24, 1999 and September 1, 1999 will be collected as if the rate reduction proposal had already been adopted. Projects of multiple phases, those that had obtained some building permits prior to the April 10, 1999 workshop and some permits subsequent to the workshop, are also affected by this resolution. In this special case, the rates for the period from April 10, 1999 to June 23, 1999 will be the same as those in the proposed Ordinance. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A rvaemmm+w w�ummmare penaa aeeas�+sw am,a ne""m aerommaan�n me Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 99-10 mm,mmnro euro�m.m�,a.nmwa+wa mm�a.a.n.ra,uuneewu.n es Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99- TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-04 RE CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-04 RE CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES WHEREAS, the District has, effective July 1, 1998, adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-04, Establishing Capital Facilities Connection Charges, which provisions are presently in full force and effect; and, WHEREAS, the District has recently concluded an exhaustive engineering and financial study relating to new schedules of Capital Facilities Connection Charges; and, WHEREAS, as a result of the completed studies, the District has recommended and introduced an Ordinance amending the Capital Facilities Connection Charges for residential, multiple residential, commercial, and industrial users, which will become effective September 1, 1999; and, WHEREAS, a number of categories of uses will realize a substantial reduction in the Capital Facilities Connection Charges to be paid to District upon the effective date; and, WHEREAS, to avoid unnecessary delay in projects and unfair levy of charges on projects seeking to proceed forward immediately, the District has determined that it is fair and equitable to suspend the levy and collection of the present fees for those categories of uses which will be decreased upon the effective date of the newly-adopted Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 1 r Section 1: That the Capital Facilities Connection Charges, as set forth and established in each of the Revenue Areas, as identified in Ordinance No. OCSD-04, are, effective upon the adoption of this Resolution, suspended in the amount equal to the difference between the rates established by Ordinance No. OCSD-04, and the rates that are decreased in amount in proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09. Section 2: That the District's Staff is directed to advise all Cities and Sanitary Districts who collect the fees on behalf of the District, of this suspension of rates, and to provide the new schedule of fees which should be imposed and collected from all connection permit applicants, effective June 24, 1999. Section 3: That the suspension of the Capital Facilities Connection Charges, as prescribed in Ordinance No. OCSD-04, shall be effective for all permits issued by application on or after June 24, 1999, except as provided in Section 4 below. Section 4: Any applicant for a connection permit, who has submitted and will obtain multiple connection permits from the District, as issued by the respective City or Sanitary District, as part of a single development project, the first of which permits was issued before April 10, 1999, shall pay the Capital Facilities Connection Charge at the rate as established by proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-09, for all connection permits for the same project, issued after April 10, 1999, with the difference between said rate and the rate as presently established by Ordinance No. OCSD-04, being suspended. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 23, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary TLW:pJ:W17199*106 31 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mefte9 Date To Bd.of.Dir. 6/7319 AGENDA REPORT ttem rvumEe Bem 4 2MEc a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: COLLECTING THE ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEE ON THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX BILL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-11, Directing the County Tax Collector to Include Sanitary Sewer Service Charges on the 1999-00 Property Tax Bills and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-36. SUMMARY Since the inception of the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Program, the charges have been collected as a separate line item on the regular annual property tax bill. Section 5473 of the Califomia Health and Safety Code requires the County to provide this service after the District adopts a resolution so directing. This is a routine matter that is required whenever the annual charge changes. The County is compensated for this service just like it is compensated for property tax collection. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A X hy.W Vaena.l9ia,a n9enea Rewm\1933&uN na-O Fe WMVtl93Jlem z. qM... , Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 99-11 H.M Ta�Agenda Re M%1 W 2 t Agenda Re� 24 R-. � Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-11 DIRECTING COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO COLLECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1999-00 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, DIRECTING THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 1999-00 PROPERTY TAX BILLS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-39 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-05, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinance, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Tax Collector is hereby ordered and directed to include sanitary sewer service charges, as adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and as established for all Revenue Areas for Fiscal Year 1999-00 by Resolution No. 99-09, on the 1999-00 property tax bills, in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this Resolution remains in effect. Section 2: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed, or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, is changed. TLW:q:0:0 fiH 199:106CE8 1 Section 3: That the General Manager be, and is hereby authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. Section 4: That Resolution No. OCSD 98-39 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 23, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary TLW:CI:D;e8117W 18008 2 Wrategic Goals O FY 1999 _, = �F L p _ _I E SAND 1' htY AT Y �.iM. a 1 9 e NB !NE ENYP Orange County Sanitation District, California July 1, 1999 TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM FOR FY '99-00 WORKPLAN r TO: Board of Directors FROM: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager zV SUBJECT: Strategic Goals Statement and Workplan for FY'99-00—Moving Toward Best in Class °r It is my pleasure to submit the FY '99-00 Goals Statement and Workplan for the District. Detailed below are the five Strategic Goals that represent our long-term commitment to excellence and establish a framework to achieve best-in-class status. These goals will be •+ applicable in FY '99-00 and beyond. This Goals Statement is also presented in the General Manager's Budget Message in your FY'99-00 Budget. Consistently Employ Strategic and Tactical Resource Planning—This goal represents our commitment to effective long-and short-term planning for both Strategic Goal projects as well as Core Business functions. Representative Workplan projects, programs and objectives in FY'99- 00 include: . development of a long-term capital financing plan; . development of a Human Resources strategic plan; . development of Y2K contingency plans; and . undertake a trunk sewer mapping project. ,y Develop and Maintain an Effective and Efficient Workforce—This goal represents our focus on maintaining and retaining a highly productive workforce throughout the organization. Representative Workplan projects, programs and objectives in FY '99-00 include: . researching in-sourcing opportunities for our Ocean Monitoring Program; . completing Engineering Department CAD and Design manuals; . improving our Project Management systems;and .. . continuing our multi-agency benchmarking studies. Consistently Apply Appropriate Technology—This goal is indicative of our commitment to utilize and maintain the right kind of technology to improve District-wide efficiency and effectiveness. Representative Workplan projects, programs and objectives in FY '99-00 include: . complete migration of the WoridVision Financial Information System (FIS)modules to OneWorid; . establish a District-wide records management system; . implement the planning and scheduling module of our Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS); and . continue evaluation of microfiltration technology for application to the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR)and wastewater processes. r i.i i Board of Directors v Page 2 July 1, 1999 v Consistently Deliver Excellent Health and Environmental Protection—This goal is critical to accomplishing our District Mission of excellent service in public health and environmental protection. Representative Workplan projects, programs and objectives in FY '99-00 include: �. • continue city outreach programs involving inflow&infiltration and conservation programs; _ • revise our wastewater discharge regulations ordinance; _ • implement a SAWPA pre-treatment program; and • begin the new NPDES permit application process. Consistently Deliver an Excellent Level of Service—Beyond the need to achieve effective and efficient services, our constituents must receive an excellent level of service. Furthermore, we must provide high levels of service to our"internal customers"—the District staff who assist each other. Representative Workplan projects, programs and objectives in FY'99-00 include: • improve the quality control/quality assurance testing in Engineering; • fully implement revised DIG Alert program; and • study sewer service user fees and consolidated rate issues. y Once the above goals were established, a series of project, program and objective tasks were developed with lead responsibility assigned to various staff. These tasks were prioritized on a 1- 3 scale (1 being critical)based on the actual need to complete the task this fiscal year. This information has been organized into a matrix, sorted by department,and represents the body of this Workplan report. Staff will be held responsible for delivering on these tasks and will be evaluated based partly on their performance in this area. V The FY'99-00 Workplan development process continued our commitment to undertake improved planning. Perhaps the major benefit of this Workplan exercise is the additional 64 attention spent in employee resource planning. Both the Board of Directors and District staff suggested an increased focus on core business during the workplan development period. As a i result, significant analysis was involved prior to Strategic Goal task development. Full-time V Equivalents (FTEs)were first assigned to Core Business and Unplanned Events,and then finally to Strategic Goal tasks. Obviously the vast majority of District effort is dedicated to Core , Business,with limited time available for re-engineering efforts associated with the Strategic �+ Goals. To portray this,each department section is preceded by a FTE pie chart showing the estimated amount of time dedicated to these various efforts. It is clear that Strategic Goals are I critical to the success of this agency;yet it is also clear that as the District re-engineers and W "right-sizes;it will be increasingly difficult to balance the need for strategic goal work with core business functions. FY '99-00 promises to be an extremely challenging year. The continuation of various efforts and the start-up of new projects, as represented in the above Strategic Goals and throughout the body of this report, are important as we continue striving for best-in-class status and move to a more performance-based organization. The Workplan will be closely monitored and we will report our progress to you in our quarterly Financial and Operational Report. r , We look forward to making excellent progress on an ambitious Workplan. Lj ; i IW Representative Strategic Goal Objectives - for Fiscal Year 1999-00 �Mll Develop,monitor and Conduct a SERA Complete migration from Continue Collections ECallf.rnia. ] er Service refine a long-term capital Department operational JD Edwards WorltlVislon System O&M Outreach st financing plan and review to determine financial information Program with member through strategy and issue COPS opportunities for system to One World titles and agencies. ith other as required. increased efficiency, suites. d Stale of effectiveness and Revise Wastewater Develop an internal quality' Continue year EDOp(Y7K) Discharge Regulations Strategic Plan for the HR preparetlnass. (artlinance)lo rafiect Report the impact of and Employee Complete development newly revisetl local consolidated rate Development Division. of a comprehensive ;Eslabliah a District-wide Ilmlla antl new policies. structure and Identify Finance Department equi records management table alternatives Implement the managed policies and procedures program including : Implement SAWPA. that share regional maintenance component manual. Electronic Document Pre-treatment Program. costs of service. of the Asset Management .., ;Management _ preliminary,primary the :Develops Public Works ---------- uReviewserfe c esto preliminary,Prima and ----------------------- -_ Begin NPDES permit ry ;procurement program with Successfully implement the : application process. user lee codes to secondary treatment plant fie Purchasing Division. : : ensurebilling equity. processes. ........................... .new Human Resources Information System suites pevelop atltlitlanal --- ------ :Developanew : :of JD Edwards On_eW_ odd.__; Emergency OPeraling :Fully implement DIG alert1 Undertake Trunk Sewer j compensation and j Procedures tobeadded 'motlifications. Mapping project. :classification Program for ..............."".""""" g •---_.__.....---sees..' Conduct cur Activaled to the tote ratetl .-----. ...... sees --------------- non-exempt employees,. : :Sludge Optimiraeon Study. Emergency Response :Improve Quality non-e empt emplo ees,... Developy !(contingency `-----------------""'---'- Program. :Comrol/Ouallty, ...search in- .......-sees. plans. .--...... -In sees..-.-sees._ P Research in-sourtlng of : :Implement Ne planning entlj __ :Assurance testing •---------------------------- ;me Oman Monitoring i {schedulin software module: Continuepamdpationin : :program in Construction Develops procurement card: .Program__________________ :in Me computerized : Dairy Waste Management ; �Engineedng. :prpgremin orderbredum : : ;Pro ------------ ----� :Ne cost of small ."."""""........."""""""' maintenance more led. Complete Engineering I system(CMMS). ... ...................... Research opportunities :procuremen6. ......................... ..able""osolid. Emplofor yee rM-ffe ---------------------------� •CAD and DeM nmanuale.: Ensure reliable biasolitls enhancing g ........................... .Evalu to mac....hation ..... . B g sees., Evaluate Mapfiltratlon j management through : Employee Wmk/Life DeveloP derision-making rove Engineering programs. : :D Improve Engineering technology application W: :Farm Acquisition and Reply for Replacement of tl ec : :Department's Project the Groundwater ;Management Pro(ecL Replacament of mechanical ;Management syalems. : :Replenishment System ........ . ' --------------sees---.----- eQuip_manL........... ;project(GWRS1.----sees---: :Expand Odor Elkrtlnaticn Developerer-plantcroas iProgram. -- ' training program in ; ;Develop and implement --------------------- _.................. Operations between plant :Data Warehouse Go ntlud Phase II se ;gt and M2. : ;arWtectures. i ;of Sulfide/Odor .......................... ... . :Characterization Study Inleprab Purchasing 8 Develop and implement an :for the collections system. Warehouses and 08M enterprise-wtle business practices. _.........--_sees_ : Geographical System Complete t.a pohcles Depanmenl's polidas and u j pramtlures manual f Continue mulfi-agency th nchmarking study. _ First Priority ;-Second Priority : Third Priority-- st2IGa exam Oo s.vssocsD of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type GENERAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION u% 3% 49% tt35% General Manager's Office 0 core Business Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events 1 l [ it Y I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S I I I t [ l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Assist in managing FY 99/00 District Operational Studies Division_ _ 110 _ _ 01 02 C13 G4 ❑ Priority 1 — --Oversee utility services audit _ —❑ ® ❑ ❑ Mathews 110 Draft report provided by conducted by consultant consultant. 0 Priority Makesense, Inc. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority i Assist in managing operational ❑ ❑ ❑ B Mathews, 110.610 Draft report provided by audit for the Safety, Environmental Ghirelll consultant. Priority 2 and Regulatory Affairs Department. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Pea 1 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Administrative Management of Y2K Project Division 110 Q1 Q$ Q3-Q4 ___ LO Priority 1 Provide Y2K administrative oversight to ensure O ® O O McIntyre, 110 Y2K Issues resoWed by all departments complete Y2K due dilligence Anderson, 12r "99. No major Y2K Priority 2 activities in timely manner. Mathews problems experiencedv1ro0.Priority 3 Wednesby,June 02, 1999 03:05 PM I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type FINANCE DEPARTMENT 7% 2% 7% 16% 0% 9% 75% 92% Finance Administration Accounting 9% 1% 6% 84% Purchasing &Warehouse Core BusineW ❑ Strategic Goals Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events 1 1 l [ ! [ 1 vRAwC C6UNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop, monitor and refine a long-term capital financing plan and strategy Division 210 01 Q2 03 04 _ ® Priority 1 Review strategic plan CIP,budget ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Slreed 210 Annual funding goals and reserves policy to determine established ❑ Priority 2 annual funding levels. ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Resolve GWRS funding ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Streed,Kozak 210 Decision made for cash, mechanism and responsibilities. COP or JPA ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Draft long-term financing plan anal ❑ ❑ El ® SbaeO Kozak 210 Report and plan presented. present itto FAHR Committee and ❑Priority 2 Board of Directors. ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Issue COPS as required by new long-term capital financing plan Division 210 O1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ® Priority 1 Determine amount of COP issued. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Slread,Kozak 210 Amount determined ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 WedneeMy,Juror 02,IM 02:66 PM Papa 3 of 66 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING 0 Priority 1 Select and retain Finance Team ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Kozak 210 Team approved by Board of through RFP process and present Directors ❑ Priority 2 to FAHR Committee. ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Receive long-term rating of AA- 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Kozak 210 Rating letters received Priority 2 ■ Priority 3 B Priority 1 COP3 issued. ❑ ❑ B ❑ Kozak 210 Funds deposited ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 waaneay,imeoR logo am PM 1a8a U-! F.- : r_ , r_: v r U- Ir1 U- r- I c-, uRA&Ut COUNTY L-ANITA I ION DISTRICT'S I f f f f l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete migration to JD Edwards OneWorld financial information system Division 210 ____.. . ... . 01_U2 _03_04 .__.___._ .._.... .__.._.. ..._—.___..._...___ . . __ . ® priority 1 Complete migration to client server ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Dubolc 230 OneWodd operating system distribution suite. Performance is is being successfully used ❑ Priority 2 dependant upon release and for purchaing,inventory reliability of software and control and Inventory issues. ❑ Priority 3 implementation team. ® Prlodly 1 Migrate to Human Resources and ❑ ❑ ❑ Cagle,Tomko 220 OneWorld operating system Payoll suite, inlcuding timekeeping is utilized for HR, Payroll and ❑ Priority 2 Timekeeping. Performance will require timely and ❑ Priority 3 reliable software and imnlomenlalinn lenm ® priod contacts ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Dubois 230 ty 1 Install OneWorld Installation and user training management module as a part of complete ❑ Priority2 migration/upgrade ❑ Priority 3 LZI1101:11ityy Successfully complete tlIB year ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ Miles Fery, 910 All installed FIS modules 200o transition White, Dubois work as well in January 2000 2 as they did in December 1999 3 Wednesday.June 02, 199902:56 PM Page 5of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Refine sewer service user fee cost allocations through a joint study with other Publicly Owned Treatment Works and State of California. Division 210 _ _ 01 02. _03 GI _ S'Vee ® Priorit 1 Develop contract with other M ❑ ❑ ❑ d 210 Contract approved by Board y POTW s and a consultant to review ❑ply 2 flow rates and strengths. Coordinate this effort with the ❑ Priority 3 ongoing studies I ® Priority 1 Complete field work to test current ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ Stead 210 Report received from flow and strength"assumptions" consultant ❑ Priority 2 for various user types ❑ Priority 3 E h, ceMeer Fee Ordinance modifald,if Stree ! 210 Ordinance adopted after nessary hearNq and second reading ❑ ty 2❑ ty 3 ® Priority 1 Revised rates forwarded to County ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Eaber 220 Rates delivered to County for 2000-01 lax bills data center contractor and O Ppo fy 2 charges delivered to Auditor- Controller ❑ Priorty 3 Wednesday,June 02.199902 M PM Pans euf es [-, (- . [- t r r. I I — rl r-. r ( 1 l t l fl f ( I [ l f 1 1 1 1 1 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Report to Board the impact of a consolidated rate and alternatives in order to more equitably share the regional costs of service. Division 210 01 02 03_04. ® Priority 1 Evaluate Options relative to ona ❑ © ❑ ❑ Streed 210 Report prepared for Board user fee rate for OCSD ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Prbrily 3 '3 Priority Develop single rate for all Revenue ❑ 1-1 lie ❑ Streed 210 Report delivered to Board of Areas or an improved method of Directors that results in clear ❑ Priority 2 sharing regional operating and direction to proceed. capital costs. ❑ Priority 3 ® Prbrlty 1 Adopt Sewer Service User Fee ❑ ❑ ❑ R Streed 210 Ordinance adopted rates for 2000-01 ❑ Priodty 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02. 1999 02:56 PM Pape 70l00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete the Development of a Comprehensive Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual Division 220 01 02 03 04 ® Priority 1 Complete the identification and ® ❑ ❑ ❑ White,D91on, 220 All documents on various compiliation of all current Pritchard accounting policies and ❑ Priority 2 accounting policies and procedures that have been tten over time will be ❑ Priority 3 Procedures. anialyzed for applicability. ® Priority 1 Identify process changes resulting Cl 0 ❑ ❑ White,Pritchard 220 Document that from the implementation of the compares/contrasts prior ❑ Priority 2 new financial information system. practice against current FIS El Priority 3 system and need for policy ty and procedure changes. 0 Priority 1 Develop the format and contend of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ White,Pritchard 220 A draft of the Accounting the Accounting Policies and Policies and Procedures ❑ Priority 2 Procedures Manual. Manual will be available for review by the Director of ❑ Priority 3 Finance. 0 Prionty 1 Prepare, edit, and distribute the ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 While Pritchard 220 The final Accounting Policies final document. and Procedures Manual will El Priority 2 be distributed to all applicable ❑ Priority 3 Departments/Divisions. Wednoulay,June 02.1999 02:56 PM Page a of N U-! F- . U u- r f- r E-- [-. F-' UI [--. [-' r.- r._ I c- 1177. c_-; �- [ [ [ [ [ [ t I t t t [DI t [ t t t t [ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION STRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete FIS Migration from the J.D. Edwards World Vision Proprietary Operating Platform to the OneWorld Client/Server Operating Platform Division 220 _ Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ® Priority 1 Complete migration to the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ White, Dubois, 220,230.930 The OneWorld operating I O neWorld platform from the World Herrera platform is being utilized for ❑ Priority,2 Vision platform for tine Distribution the following applications: Suite Applications. Purchasing, Inventory, and ❑ Pdwftf 3 Sales Order. ___ __.._ -- - _ _- _ -- - ___-. -__ _ ___ - _ - -_. _ ___rPrIlo,Ity Pr' i Complete migration to the L7 ❑ ❑ ❑ While, Dillon, 220 The OneWorld operating OneWorld platform from the Word Aldridge platform is being utilized for 2 Vision platform for Fixed Assets. the Fixed Asset application. 3 ® ply 1 Complete the Financial Information ❑ Fr7 ❑ ❑ While Feery, 220.230.930 AN installed FIS modules are System Year 2000 compliance Homers as fully functional in January ❑ Pmiomily2 testing. of 2000 as they were in the .. ❑ Pmlorily 3 prior year. ® ply 1 Complete District-Wide training on ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Cagle,Thiede 220.230 All budget coordinators, the OneWorld operating system divisional FIS trainers, &the ❑ priority 2 (on-line Purchase Requistion Engineering Dept. (for Job initiation and approvals, budget Cost)will have been trained ❑Priority 3 tracking,and Project Management in OneWorld. 0 Priority 1 Complete migration to the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Cagle,Howell, 220.510 The OneWorld operating OneWorld platform from the World Temko platform is being utilized for ❑ Priority 2 Vision platform for the Human the following applications: ❑ Priority 3 ResourcelPayroll Suite HR. Payroll,and Budgeting. Applications. Wednesday,June 02, 199902:56 PM Paps9d e6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Review Sewer Service User Fee Codes for Billing Equity Div_ision__ 220 .___ _____ ___._ Q1 Q2 Q3. 04 ® Priority 1 Monitor the work performed by ❑ ® ❑ 01 Ester 220 Monthly consultant reports consultants on the review of on the status of site visits ❑ Priority 2 approximately 4,000 parcel sites in and Inequities found in the determining the property use and Assessor's data base. ❑ Priority 3 user fee coding EaPriority 1 Complete field work in the review ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Fsber 220 Final report received from of approximately 4,000 parcel site consultants. ❑ Priority 2 visits in determining the property use and user fee coding ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Assist In the development of the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Eater 220 Ordinance adopted. User Fee Ordinance modifications, ❑ Priority 2 If pessary. ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Revised rates forwarded to the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ester 220 The County's data base is County for implemenaton on the revised to reflect adjusted ❑ Priority 2 2000-01 tax bills. rates. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,16ae ass PM Pete to of Be €—i F r- V._ [.-- r_ I C- C—' C- r—'' �I �', [ I C- . C 1 [ I " C`t L I 1 1 l l 1 1 uRAucCaulvTYSiaNITFEIIuNdibIRIJI'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Selection of Independent Auditors for Annual Financial Audit Division .__._ 220 _. 01 02 G3 04 . __ _.—_______ —_ ® Priority 1 Develop a Request for Proposal ❑ ® ❑ ❑ White 220 FAHR approved to release for the selection of an independent request for proposal for ❑ Priority 2 financial auditing fine to perform independent financial the District's annual financial audit autlilors. ❑ Priority 3 over the next five years. ® Prbrily 1 Development of an Auditor ❑ ❑ ® ❑ White 220 Selection of an independent Selection Committee to review auditing firm to perform the ❑ Priority 2 audit proposals, interview qualified District's annual financial ❑ Prio 3 auditing firms,and make audit over the next five years. rity recommendation to the FAHR (:nmmiflee Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 11 of sti ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop Flexible boilerplate consultant and services contracts to meet quick turnaround demands by Internal staff Division _._ 230 Q1 02Q304 _ _ _ _—____.. _.__._. _.__ ._.___ ❑ Priority 1 Conduct survey of Purchasing staff ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Dubois,Thistle, 230 Obmin feedback from 8telF to obtain specific needs they may Marcin and doarnrenl ® Priority 2 have depending upon assigned commodity or service. ❑ Pdority 3 ❑ Priority Develop draft of proposed ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Dubois,Thiede, 230 Proposed contracts should boilerplate contracts to include Marcin be in cut and paste format © Priority 2 insurance and bond requirements. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Pdority 7---_— Submit proposed draft contracts to ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Dubos Thiede, 230,General Completed and approved - Woodrulf.Spredlin 6 Smart far Martin,Tom Counsel contracts that are functional ®Pdority 2 review,revisemenk and approval. Woodruff and Flexible for quick ❑ Prlorily 3 demand procurements wednnasy.Jane o2,1999 am PM Pane 12 of e6 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 ORANGE CAUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S I I I I 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Continue the ABC cycle coupt program and maintain a 97% accuracy rate or better Division 230 QLQ2Q3..Q4 ❑ Priority Conduct review of ABC cyce count ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Hannappel 230 Review completed and program and submit first quarter report submitted ® Priority 2 report on accuracy ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Second quarter report on accuracy ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Hannappel 230 Report submitted ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 LPrIo Third quarter report on accuracy ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Hannappel 230Report cubmided ❑ Pdority 1 Fourth quarter report on accuracy ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Hannappel 230 Report submitted ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,Ane 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 13 of N ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT ANDIOR OBJECTIVE: Develop a Public Works procurement program in concert with the Engineering Department Division 230 Q1 Q2, Q3_94 ❑ 230,720,730 Successfully hire a qualified hire the appropriate staff to Stewart, Linder Contracts Administrator, ® priority 2 property support this program Buyer,and 1.5 ffe'a of Priority 1 Begin the recruitment process to ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Dubois,Thlede, clerical support. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Begin mapping procurement and ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Dubols Thia a, 230.710.720, Complete mapping of contract processes with the Stewart, Linder, 730 processes and formalize a C� Priority 2 respective divisions and Chaudhry, draft process in order for subsequently determine an Mercln Purchasing to administrate ❑ Priority 3 effective public works public works procurement. runmremenl nrnneae ❑ Priority 1 Begin training program for all ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Dubcts,Thkide, 230,710 720, Conduct a training meeting affected staff on proposed new Stewart.Linder, 730 for all staff affected. 96 Priority 2 process. Ensure staff is in place Chaudhry, Handouts of process made and able to support new demands. Marcin available. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Begin several Pilot public works ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Du".-Made. 230,710,720 The issuance of a procurements to test whether new Stewart,Linder, 730 solicitation for a public ® Priority 2 procurement processes will be Chaudhry, works project originating out successful. Attempts will be made Mercln of the Purchasing division. ❑ PrloHty 3 to select low risk projects for this nllnl Wednesday,June 02, Me 02:56 PM Page 14 of 86 [ C— f- C - [ I [ r- F- r- II-' r- ( -1 r". IF ._ [ C 1 1 I [ l 1 I t l 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE 8, EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement Purchasing 6 Warehouses and O & M business practices Integration project Division _.. 230 _._._. _ Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Working with Planning 8 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Rdk 230,850,860 Detailed project plan Scheduling,expand the current Hannappel,Jeff defining tasks,If necessary, ® Priority 2 project plan to define whether Key,Les that must be accomplished, ❑ Priority 3 reclassification and standardization Thornpeon resources that will be Y of Inventory is needed required and the schedule that is nrnnnsed to rmmnlnte ❑ Priority 1 We with Planning& ® ❑ ❑ ❑ With 230, 850, 860 Report on group findings Scheduling,determine how Hannappel, Jeff and proposed solutions ® Priority 2 equipment to parts cross Key,Lee ❑ Priori 3 referencing can I accomplished Thompson Priority and where the data should reside. ❑ Priority 1 Working with the Planning& ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Rick 230,850,860 A process flow chart and Scheduling group, develop a Hannappel,Jeff responsibility table defining ® Priority 2 process that defines how the O& Key,Les the required steps and M planning and scheduling Thompson responsible party for each ❑ Priority 3 process will function with the step in the process Warohnnnwa PROJECT ANDIOR OBJECTIVE: Roll out and monitor the pilot procurent card program (Year two, 2nd phase) Division 230 _ _ Q1 Q2. 03_04. _._.._ . ._.__._ -DI ._._. ❑ Priority 1 Fine tune procurement card ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Dubob 230 Director of Finance final (Procard)policies and procedures review. Manual to be copied ® Priority 2 Instruction manual to reflect and bound. ❑ Priority 3 District processes Wednesday,Jon.02.1999 02:56 PM Pepe 15 of so ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE &EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority I Develop a training program for the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Dubois,Maher 230 Conduct a training program pre-selected staff utilizing the pilot for the cardholders.The W Priority 2 procard program and conduct milestone shall include the training. execution of an employee ❑ Priority 3 contract. ❑ Priority t Monitor through the American ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Dubos,Maher 230 Utilizing American Express Express reporting system all areas program tools available,an ® Priority 2 determined to be critical to the on-going compilation of date success of the procard program summarizing card usage ❑ Priority 3 frequency par cardholder; rnmmnditiec n..md ❑ Priority 1 —-- Recommend and adopt— ❑ ❑ ❑ B Dubos,TNede, - 230 =--- A survey instrument will be improvements to the procard Maher provided to all participants ® Prior 2 program based up data captured for input on program since the beginning of improvements. ❑ Priority 3 implementation. Weanadoty..Mns 02.logo 0ZW PM Pree laofas I [ [ [ t t 1 ` C _ C [ I I t I I l I ORANGE C UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Begin transition to One-World FIS distribution suite from World Vision Division 230 _ 01 02 C13 04 _ ® Priority 1 Begin investigative process of One• Ea El ❑ ❑ Dubois,Thiede 230 Begin preliminary listing of World functionality to identify areas One-World's expanded ❑ Priority 2 of increased efficiency and capabilities and map into effectiveness to be i%, porated current processes and ❑ Priority 3 into the new distribution system procedures ® Priority 1 Complete all Finance contingency ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Stread Dubois, Entire Finance Flow charts completed and plans per functionality l division White, Feery, Department test conducted El Priority 2 and incorporate all plans into a SME's seamless manual process in the ❑ Priority 3 event of Y2K failure. ® Priority 1 Complete migration to the One- El ❑ ® ❑ Dubois Thiede, 230 One-World being utilized for World platform the implementation Heme , Purchasing,inventory,Sales ❑ pr�dty 2 of the distribution suite order ❑ Priori 3 applications. Begin developing ty Contracts Management module. 0 Priority 1 Complete training program for ❑ ❑ El 0 Oubols,Thiede, 230 All selected staff will have appropriate distribution modules Henem been trained in One-World. ❑ Priority 2 Start up Contracts Management Contracts Management module. Module live ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02.1999 02:56 PM Page 17 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Y2K compliance project - Firiance Department Division _ 230 -- ---_.---- Gt O2Q3 O4 _ © Priority 1 Perform off-site Y2K feeling for ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Screed,Dubois, All tliv sions With pre written scripts, JDE FIS system(s)- Abbreviated White, Feery, within Finance SME's perform tests and ❑ Priority 2 test. subject matter Deparment document outcomes. ❑ Priority 3 experts(SME's) andHer Mike ® Priority1 Complete all Finance contingency ❑ © ❑ ❑ Streed Dubois, Entire Finance Flow charts completed for plans per functionality/Division While, Feery, department each function with summary ❑ Priority 2 and Incorporate all plans into a SME's of of activity in the event of seamless manual process in the Y2K failure. ❑ Priority 3 event of Y2K failure. PrloHty 1 On-site Y2K testing for JDE FIS ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Streed Dubois, Entire Finance Utilizing pre-written scripts, system(s)-Full test. White,Feery, Deparbnenl SME's conduct lest and ❑ Priority 2 Herrera,SME'a document outcome. 1❑ Priority 3 ® priority 1 Implement contingency plan In the ❑D ® ❑ Screed Dubois, Entire Finance Implement contingency event of Y2K failure. White,Feery, Department plan(s)and strategize on ❑ Priority 2 SME's continued off-line ❑ Priority 3 contingency procedures. Wednesday,June 02. 19M 02:6e PM Page 1e of Be F _ _ U— r_ _ r_- U— r— U U IF U r e F Ir. _ t_- �_ f I t I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I. 1 1 1 1 [ 1 l % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT of 14% 5% 81% Communications Department Core Businesf Strategic Goals 0 Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Establish a District-wide records management program Division 310 Qi _G2 Q3 q4 ❑ Pdodty 1 Establish a committee of Records ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Kyle 310 Committee established Coordinators from every ® Prlorily2 division/department ❑Priority 1 Receive RFPs for records ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Kyle 310 Contract awarded management consultant and ® Priority 2 award contract ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Inventory and classify all District ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Kyk 310 Inventory and classification records completed ® hbrity Z ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Develop records retention schedule ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Kyle 310 Records retention approved by EMT,General Council ® Priority 2 and Board ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 --flop records management ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Kyle 310 -_ =Program approved by EMT, program General Council and Board ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wedna ft.Jame 02.19002255 PM Page 19 of as ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY El Priority 1 Begin implementing records ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Kyle 310 Training of records management program coordinator begins ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ priority 1 Establish and conduct"Spring ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Kyle 310 Purged files to be destroyed; Cleaning Day'for records move approved records to ® Priority 2 off4te storage ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Prioph,l Begin development of software- ❑ o ❑ ® Kyle 310 Begin records management related tracking for existing paper software program Indexing El Prority 2 records of paper records El Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE; Implement an OCSD Web site as part of the agency's external communications strategy Division 310 Q1 02 Q3 04 ® Priority 1 Vendor selection © ❑ ❑ ❑ Tuchman, 310 Vendor is selected to Hellebrend Implement final phase of ❑ Priority 2 Web site development ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 District Web site is complete ❑ ❑ ❑ Ed Tuchman, 310 Permanent District Web site Hellebrand is up and running ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,109902:56 PM Page 20 of 86 U- C — [-- r- r- [- _ _r- r- [- [ [ [ € E C of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type GSA DEPARTMENT 3% 4%tk 13% 16% 66 18% )79°/ GSA Administration Collections Facilities O&M 6% 1 9% 841% Facilities Maintenance Core Business 0 Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events I l I l fl 1 fl ORA muE CLuNTY1, tANIA I ION bib rRIGT-5 li 1 ! fl fl STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Participate In Collection System CIP Planning and Implementation Division 420 Q1 Q2 Q3_Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Attend meetings.review data, ® ® ® ®J�M� 420.720,730 Summery Report each.—. provide comments rxusker, Quarter ®Priority 2 Lindner ..loan. ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Trunk Sewer Mapping Project Division 420 01 42 Q3 04 ® priority 1 Complete RFP package for 0 El ❑ Arhontes, 420,230,720.46 RFP Documents Mapping Consultants " sker, 0 ❑ Priority 2 Thiel,Lsor, Hass ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Award of Project ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Ares. 420,230 Purchase Order McCusker, ❑ PrWty2 Thiede ❑Priority 3 ® ply t Develop Project Schedule and ❑ ❑ ® ❑ MCCute 420,460,720 Schedule 8 Workplan Workptan and FY00/01 funding Arhontes,Floss, ❑ptpdty 2 needs if needed Wtnsor ❑Priority,3 Wednesday,Jane 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 21 of 80 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING ® Priority 1 Manage Project ❑ ❑ ❑ ® McCusker, 420 Progress Report vri0 Arhontes scheduled deliverables ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,199902:56 PM __ Page 22of 88 r—. [— r'_ U— , �—_ . r - I Ir r-, r- 117— 117-- rT' !_.__ r V - uRAGE AUNTYISANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Annual Collection Systems O&M Outreach Program with Member Cities and Agencies Division 420 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Priodty 1 Develop Questionnaire ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Adlontes, 420 Completed Ouestionnaire Talebi, ❑Pdorily 2 �emu, ' ❑ Prbrtty 3 McNelly ® pN ority 1 Schedule and conduct Meetings ❑ L� L 1 ❑ McNelly, 420 410,640 Completed meetings, J Amontes, questionnaires,&notes ❑ Priority 2 Renescu, A hontes ❑ Priority 3 ® priority 1 Compile date and produce report ❑ ❑ ❑ ® McNally. 410AM Find Report Arhordes ❑priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 We*wx*,AM 02.1990 02:56 PM Page 23 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop a Quarterly Status Report on the Electric Cart Fleet Division430 01 02 0304 —__.—..__ ® Prority 1 Develop DRAFT report format ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Forman, 430 DRAFT Formal using CMMS Tafolia, date ❑ Priority 2 Hamilton ❑ Priority 3 0:PPrr:-1rrr`,ttyyy 1 2nd Quarter Report ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Forman 430 Report from CMMS data wl Tafolla, recommendations ❑ 2 Hamilton ❑ 3 ® Priority t 3rd Quarter Report ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Forman, 430 Report from CMMS tlata Tafoga, wlrecommendations ❑ Priority 2 HamAten ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 4th Quarter Report ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Forman 430 Report from CMMS data w/ Tafo%a, recommendations ❑ Priority 2 Hamilton ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02.1999 02:36 PM Page 24 of as �" ( i---1 [ C" C C— U— r- r-- 1 fl 1 t fl [ 1 URALGE CDUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S I 1 ! 1 [ I STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop Decision Making Model for Rebuild or Replacement of Mechanical Equipment Division 430 _ _ 01 Q2 Q3 04 L,IPP,d*lr,I,ttyy ty1 Anafym decision making process ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Arhntes, 430,850,230 Develop a process Flow on Rebuild vs.PurchaseJones. Forman, chart and responsibility table 2 Hise,Watson, defining the required steps 3 Dubois, antl responsible pa ty for Hannappel each step in the process ❑ Priority 1 Develop Draft Procedures ❑ ❑ M ❑ Forman, 430.850,230 DRAFT of Final Procedures Watson,Hise, ® Priority 2 Hannappel ❑ Priority 3 EPlillity yTest DRAFT Procedures, ❑ ❑ ❑ M Forman, 430,850,230 Progress report withImplement Pilot Test,recommend Watson, Hise, recommendations 2 Workplan tasks for FY 00/01 Hannappel 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Participate in Plant Facilities CIP Planning and Implementation Division 430 _ Q1 02 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Attend meetings, review data, lid Ea M M Arhonles, 430,720 730 Summary Reports each provide comments jForrnan, Quarter ® Priority 2 Keating& designated staff ❑ Priority 3 Wednes0ay,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 25 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Process Area Piping Labeling Project Division 430 01 Q2 03 04 ® Priority 1 Develop workplan and schedule ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Forman, Flntas, 430,830,840 Workplan with staffing and for both Plants Cook and staff schedule ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 2nd Quarter Report ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Forman 430 Progress Repon ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 0 Priority 1 3rd Quarter Report ❑ ❑ La ❑ Forman 430 Progress Report ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 4th Quarter Report ❑ ❑ ❑ ® FOnnen 430 Progress Report ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:88 PM Page 20 of 88 _ % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT si 7% 77% Human Resources Department Core Business Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events vRAL�C CbUNMIANITAI ION 6ISTRI4!T'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop a strategic plan for the new HR and Employee Development Division Division 510 01 U2.Q3_U4 ® Priority 1 Develop strategy and set ❑ lid ❑ O L.Tomko 510 Completed and Implemented benchmarks by the end of the 2nd quarter ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wedneedey,Jura 02,199902:5e PM Pane 27 o/ae ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete Clerical Training Programs started in FY 97-98 Division 510 _ _ __ _ _01 02 Q3 0_4 Priority 1 Contact vendors and establish ® ❑ ❑ ❑ D. Martinez 570 Vendors and dates training dates established by the end of the 0 Priority 2 1st quarter ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Conduct Clerical training, evaluate ❑ ❑ ❑ ® D. Martinez 510 Clerical staff will be trained classes and close out program and program will be closed ® Priority 2 out by the end of the 4th ❑ Priority 3 quarter PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop new compensation and classification program for non-exempt employees Division_- _ 510 Q1 02 0_04 ❑ Priority 1 Work with bargaining units to ® ® ® ❑ D.McKinley 510 Meeting with 501 and develop program;develop OCF_A. One meeting ® Priority 2 prototypes monthly beginning In August 99 through❑ Priority 3 3 d quarter ihe end of the ❑Priority 1 Obtain approval from management ❑ ❑ ® ❑ D.Mddnley 510 Present recommendation by and Board the end of the 3d quarter ® Priority 2 ❑Priority 3 Wednesday,An 02,199902:611 PM Pape 20 of 86 r- I [ - , r- r- r r- • r- r- r-- I t l U < < I t ORALGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS t l I STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE& EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Communicate new compensation ❑ ❑ ❑ ® D. McKinley 510 Conduct educational and classification plan to all meetings to communicate ® Priority 2 empoyees the new plan by the end of ❑P&ft 3 the 4ih quarter PROJECT MINIOR OBJECTIVE: ProvMe Whence in the Workplace Awareness Training for all Employees Division 510 O1 02 03 04 ® Priority 1 Select a vendor for the training and la ❑ ❑ Sr Anatysl,D. 510 Vendor and dales will be set establish training dales Martinez by end of tat quarter ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Conduct Violence in the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sr.Andyat,D. 510 Training rompleted for all Workplace trakNng in the 2nd and Martinez employees by the end of the ❑Priority 2 3rd quarters 3rd quarter ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Evaluate the Violence in the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sr.Analyst,D. 510 Evaluation summary Workplace training Mardnez completed by the end of the ❑ Priority 2 4th quarter ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02.199902:56 PM PaW290155 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop, evaluate and Implement Interactive technology on the HR/ED Internet web site Division _ 510 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ® priority 7 Identify opportunities for interactive ❑ ❑ ❑ J. Reed,D. 610 A summary report on technology and prioritize those Martinez prioritized interactive ❑ Priority 2 opportunities based on efficiency technology opportunities and effectiveness impacts developed and submitted by ❑ Priority 3 the end of the 1st quarter ------- ---- — - ------ ® Develop— means-- —and_ —methods for ❑ ® ❑ ❑ J. Reed,D.. 6[0 Develop an outline of Priority 1 Implementing prioritized interactive Martinez implementation options by ❑ Priority 2 technology opportuni0es the end of the 2nd quarter ❑ Priority 3 0 priority 1 Implement the interactive O ❑ ❑ ® J. Reed,D. 610 The opportunities scheduled technology opportunities with the Martinez for completion in FY 99-00 ❑ Priority 2 HR/ED Internet sections will be completed in the 4th quarter ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effectiveness of the computer-based training program Division 510 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ® Priority 1 Evaluate the usage of the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ R.Spencer,M. 510 The usage will be computer-based training program Eddy determined and reviewed by ❑ Priority 2 the end of the 2nd quarter ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02. 1999 02:56 PM Pepe 30 of as r- - E . I r I f- - E...._, 1—' 1 r ^. r-1 IC-- F--.I [�-1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY ® Priority 1 Evaluate the cost effectiveness of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ R.Spencer, M. 510 A recommendation the computer-based training Eddy regarding the computer. ❑ Priority 2 program based on the usage and based training program will needs be submitted by the end of ❑ Priority 3 the 3rd quarter PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Evaluate various training mdnagement software systems Division 510 Q1 Q2 Q3 04 _ LJ Priority 1 Evaluate various training ❑ pen❑ s ❑ R.Scer 510 Submit a recommendation management software systems on conclusions by the end of ❑ Priority 2 the 3rd quarter ® Priority 3 PROJECT ANDIOR OBJECTIVE: Merge the HR/ED Internet Information Into one comprehensive site Division _ _. 510--'---- ....._.__ 01._Q2 .Q3_04. _.. ....._._... ® Priority 1 Determine and post appropriate El ® ❑ ❑ J. Reed.D. 610 Information will be posted by training and development Martinez the end of the 2nd quarter ❑ Priority 2 information to the Joint site ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Pass 31 or 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Report organizational trainlgg activities via the Internet Division 510 _ _ 01 Q2Q3 04 ❑ Priority 1 Design report templates that ® ❑ ❑ ❑ R.Spencer 510 The information will be provide training activity information available via the Internet by O Priority 2 to the organization via the Internet the end of the 1 sl quarter ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Successfully Implement the new HRIS Division _5110 Q1 02_03_ 04 ❑ Priority 1 Successfully convert the JDE El El 0 J.Gray 510 Target dale for World Vision system to the JDE Implementation completion 0 Priority 2 One World system in 4th quarter ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Successfully implement the new ❑ ❑ ❑ ® J.Gray 510 Implementation completion reporting system on JDE target date at the end of the ® Priority 2 4th quarter ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Successfully Implement the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® J.Gray 510 Both modules successfully position control and job modules of Implemented by the end of ® Priority 2 the HRIS system the 4th quarter ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02. 199902:56 PM Page 32 cr a6 E C I U [ r. _, [_ r_, r-, [Ir� r-, t t t ( ORA�GE COUNTY'SANITATION DISTRICT'S i l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Research opportunities for enhancing employee work/life programs Division 510 Qt Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Present recommendations to 10 ❑ ❑ 0 J.Bucher,J. 510 Recommendations complete management and prepare to Gray by the end of the 4th quarter, ❑ Priority 2 implement approved implementation in progress recommendations ® Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Update and Implement the orientation program for new employees Division 510 Qt Q2 Q3 04 _ ❑ Pity 1 Gather and compile information for ® ❑ ❑ ❑ M.Eddy 510 Questionnaire developed new employee program and distributed by the end of ❑PrbHty2 the 1st quarter - ® Priority 3 ❑Priority 1 Develop a plan for Implementing ❑ ® ❑ ❑ M.Eddy 510 An inplernentalion outline _ the new employee orientation will be developed by the end ❑ Priority 2 program of the 2nd quarter ® Priority 3 ❑ Prieft1 Prepare course materials for ❑ ❑ ® ❑ M.Eddy 510 Course materials prepared delivery and begin program and program ready for ❑ Priority 2 delivery by the end of the 3rd ® Priority 3 quarter Weaneatlsy,Jura 02,199902:56 PM Pope 33ofee % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type SERA DEPARTMENT (Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs) 5% 3% 3% 5% 15% 21% 75% 73% SERA Administration Environmental Compliance & Monitoring 3% 1% 3% 2% 12% 7% 84 )88-%1. Environmental Sciences Lab Source Control Core Business ❑ Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events I I I I % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type I I I I I SERA DEPARTMENT (cont'd) 10% 0% 10% eo% Health and Safety 0 Core Business Strategic Goals 0 Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Conduct an operational review to determine efficiencies, opportunities and staffing needs to comply with the 5-Year Staffing Plan for the Department Division 610 Q1 02 Q3 Q4 ® Priority 1 Develop an RFP soliciting the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Ghirelll, 610. 110 The Issuance of a request services of a consulting firm to Mathews for proposal soliciting a ❑Priority 2 conduct the operational review. consulting firm to conduct an operational review of the ❑ Priority 3 Technical Services Dept. ® Priority 1 Select a consulting fine to conduct ❑ ® ❑ IfGhlrelli, [610, 110 Based on the responses an operational review of the Memo" received to the RFP,select a ❑ Priority 2 Technical Services Department. consulting fine. ❑ Priority 3 Fa Priority 1 Complete the fieldwork for the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Ghlrelli 810 The consulting firm will preparation of the operational Interview District's staff and ❑ Priority 2 review report. obtain the necessary data to ❑ Priority 3 complete the operational tY review. ® Priority 1 Issuance of a draft of the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ghirelll 610 The consultant will issue a operational review report with draft of the operational ❑ Priority 2 recommendations. review report to the Technical Services ❑ Priority 3 Department for review. 0 Priority 1 Issuance of the final operational ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ghirelll 610 After editing the draft report, review report. the final operational review ❑ Priority 2 report will be presented to the OMTS Committee. ❑ Priority 3 Wedneedey,June 02,199902M PM Page 34 of IS [-- I r - 1 r-- I c r- : c - Ir r-, r-, r-1 V t 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICT'S I ( l l l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ® Priority 1 Begin implementation of from ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ghlrelli 610 Begin Implementation of the recommendations resulgrrg findings resulting from the ❑Priority 2 operational review based on operational review in priorities and schedule developed accordance with the ❑ Priority 3 in consultation with EMT and approved schedule. OUTS Wednesday,June 02,19990246 PM Page 35 of 88 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Ocean Monitoring Program Insourcing Project Division__. 620 ---_-- --'-- Q1 Q2 G3 Q4 — ❑ Priority 1 Develop an Ocean Monitoring li ❑ ❑ ❑ I2sYertson, 620 Develop Ad Hoc reports Database Management Nguyen exportable to standard ® Priority 2 System/Upgrade- Water Quality formats and start migration of historic water quality data. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Develop an Ocean Monitoring ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Robertson, 820 Identify and select a Database Management Nguyen contractor to complete ® Priority 2 System/Upgrade-Benthlc infeune, Phase II. ❑ Priority 3 sediment chemistry, trawls ❑ Priority 1 Develop an Ocean Monitoring ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Robertson, 820 Develop(1)routine to load Database Management Nguyen the data,(2)data QA ® Prlorlty 2 System/Upgrade- Benthlc routines,and(3)application infauna, sediment chemistry,trawls interface. ❑ Priortty 3 LPrIrityy Develop an Ocean Monitoring ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Armstrong, 620 Draft a proposal for Database Management Robertson Insourcing the writing of the System/Upgrade-Develop Plan Annual Report. for Writing of the Annual Report ❑ Priority 1 Develop an Ocean Monitoring ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Robertson, 820 Merge other releled date Database Management Nguyen e.g.,sample,species list, k Priority2 System/Upgrade-Benthlc lnfaune, chemistry codes,ODES sediment chemistry,trawls qualifier codes. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,ton 02:a6 PM se drag jr-- i r - ; I" - I r r U--I r-" rI r l l [ l A tORANGE 'COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ( t l [ t STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE — - -- ---- — -- -- ---- — - - -- — -- —FE Develop an Ocean Monitoring ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Robertson, 620 Identify and select a Database Management Nguyen contractor to complete System/Upgrade-Histopathctogy, Phase Ill. toxicity, regional monitoring ly 3 ❑P�My Develop an Ocean Monitoring ❑ ❑ ❑ B Robertson, 620 Develop ad hoc reports Database Management Nguyen exportable to standard ®PrioY 2 System/Upgrade - Benthic formats and migrate all infauna, sediment chemistry,trawls historic data. ❑ Priority 3 ErRy Develop an Ocean Monitoring O ❑ ❑ ® Robertson, 620 Develop(1)routine to bad uye Database Management Ngn data, (2)data OA routine, 2 System/Upgrade - Histopathology, and(3)application interface. toxicity, regional monitoring 3 Wednesday,June 02. 1999 02:5e PM Page 37 or 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Dairy Waste Management Project Division 620 p priority,t Complete the connection design ❑ ® ❑ ❑ M.D.Moore, 620 Prepare updaes.t are a and conclude the Initial dairy hook- Baroldi,Vitlro progress report when all ® Priority 2 ups to the SARI line. Participating dairies are sewered. ❑ Priority 3 1Begi❑ Priority 1 n monitoring the sewered ❑ ® ❑ ❑ M.D.Moore, 820 Provide a report based on dairies and evaluate their impact Berddi,VBko the monitoring and an Priority 2 on the SARI line and the treatment evaluation results. ❑ Priority 3 plant. ❑ parity 1 Outline plan to connect to the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ M.D.Moore, 820 Prepare a draft document SARI line to other dairies Baroldl,VBko outlining the plan ® pyiorty 2 Interested in this waste implementation. management approach. ❑ Priorky 9 ❑ priority t Develop a pilot project for manure ❑ ❑ ® ❑ M.D.Moore, 620 Prepare a draft document management that would integrate Barokli,Vftko outlining the manure ® Priority 2 the District's future biosolids management pilot project. ❑ Priority 3 strategies. ❑ priority t Review and comment on the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ M.D.Moore, 620 Prepare updates and draft a Manure Management Plan. Begin Beroldl,Vitko regional manure ® Priority2 evaluating viable approaches to management document. O Priority 3 manure management in the region. Wednesday,June 02, 19W 02:56 PM Paae 39or 8e 1 1 1 I 1 l ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S 1 ( 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Insure reliable long-term site biosolids management - Farm Acquisition and Management Project Division_ 620 Q1 Q_Q3_Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Complete all aspects of due ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ M.D.Moore, 620 Provide reports and a diligence for site evaluation- If Baroldl progress report on site 0 PrWft2 feasible and appropriate, purchase status. land. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 If she is purchased,evaluate ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 M.D. Moore, 620 Provide progress report on efficiency of management and Baroldi, Brooks biosolids management firm's 0 Priory 2 trucking firm performance. performance. ❑Priority 3 ❑Pr1oAty 1 If she is purchased,evaluate ❑ ❑ ❑ ® M D Moore, 620 Provide progress report on subcontractor Farm Management Baroldi,Brooks biosolids management flrrrr's 0 priority2 Performance. performance. ❑ Priority 9 ❑ Priority 1 If site is purchased,evaluate pop ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 M D Moore, 620 Provide progress report on yields Bardd4 Brooks crop yields Recommend 0 Pity 2 future contracting needs. ❑Priority 3 ❑Priority 1 If she is purchased,contract whh ❑ ❑ ® ❑ MA.Moore, 020 = -Provide monthly updates. cocking and farm managment BeroMl 0 Priority 2 firms. ■ Priority 3 Wednesday,Jurre 02.f 999 02:56 PM Pap 39 of a$ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: NPDES Application Preparation Project Division _ 620 .-'-_..---- -- 01 02 03 04 --- ® Priority 1 Develop draft permit renewal ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Colston, Hunter 620 Draft Permit Renewal project tasks(information Items), a Project Plan. ■ Priority 2 timeline of task activities,and a general estimate of District's slag ❑ Priority 3 and consultant needs. ® Priority 1 Meet with individual divisions to ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Colston,Hunter 620 Prepare project progress review staffing and resource needs report containing projected ❑ Prority 3 2 to support Permit Renewal Project. in-house staffing and ❑ Priori resource needs and update tY on Project Plan. ® Priority 1 Develop project costs for staf0ng ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Colston, Hunter 620 Project progress report on (positions and FTEs),resources, status of Permit Renewal ❑ Priority 2 and consultant needs. Use these Project Plan. Memorandum ❑ Priori 3 costs to develop ECM fiscal year recommending ECM budget Priority 2000-2001 budget. costs for Project staging and P np..M.q ® Priority 1 Finalize renewal project goals, ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Colston, Hunter 620 Final Permit Renewal tasks,staffing assignments Project Plan developed and ❑ Priority 2 (including FTEs), integrated distributed. timeline, and consultant support ❑ Priority 3 requirements(including proposal naadel Wednesday.Juse 0219002M PM Paps 40 of96 C I ["_ , u- I [:-- C- , C_ i [- + E-i C-i < < < uRALUE CbUNTY-ANITATION DISTRICTS l t l [ It STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Coordinate Year 2000 Compliance Activities for SERA Department Division 630 01 q2 _03_04 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 p� 1 Complete Assessment of ® Tremblay, 830 Assessment complete and Laboratory Inventory for Y21K Bitmtein, equipment purchased and ❑ Priority compliant compliance and purchase McGee, received 10/31/99. compliant hardware and software Christensen ❑ Priority 3 as required. ® Priority 1 Install equipment including ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Tremblay, 630 l Complete installation of interface to LIMS as appropriate, Bluestein, equipment and validation to ❑ priority 2 validate to Y2K compliance. McGee, Y2K compliance by 1211199 Christensen ❑ Priority 3 ®p�pty 1 Complete studies on new ❑ ® ❑ ❑ [Bluestein, 630 Complete detection knit equipment puchased for Y2K to Christensen studies by 12H5199. ❑ pNoNty 2 confirm acceptable detection limits for all chemical parameters. ❑Priority 3 ® Priority I Complete the SERA Department's ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Trembiay 630 Report completed and audit Y2K summary report and follow up deficiencies corrected by ❑ Priority2 audit. 21112000. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,Jere 02.1999 02:55 PM Page 41 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Evaluate Staff Productivity to Improve Efficiency Division 640 _ 01 Q2_03 Q4 EPP:1170mittyy 1 Conduct analysis of the field ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Benzie,Talebi 640 Prepare a report productivity data and identify areas summarizing the findings 2 that need improvement. and recommended actions 3 by December 31, 1999. ❑Priority 1 Implement the recommended ❑ ❑ 0 I Benzie,Talebi 640 Provide progress reports on actions. a quarterly basis. 8 Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,Jww 02,leas 02:56 PM Page 42 of 86 E` I F- C— : C r [-: C-- CI C) uRALE CISIINTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S f [ l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implementation of SAWPA Pretreatment Program _Division 640 Q7 Q2 Q3 Q4 L�7 Priority 1 W with SAWPA to identify the 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Talabi, 640 Provide a progress report by SAWPA pretreatment program Wybenga, the end of the first quarter. ElPrbrHy 2 defiCienc es. Christensen ❑PrbNly 3 ® Priority 1 Work with SAWPA to ensure that ❑ ® El ❑ Takd 640 Provide asemi-annual SAWPA will devote adequate Wybenga, report to be sent to EPA by ❑ Priority 2 resources to implement the Christensen December 31, 1999. pretreatment program. ❑ Priority ty 3 ® priority t Work with SAWPA to ensure that ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Telebi. 640 Provide a progress report by all permittees in the SAWPA Wybenga, the end of the third quarter. ❑ Priority 2 jurisdiction have correct permits Christensen and requirements. ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 Work with SAWPA to ensure that ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Talent 640 Provide a second semi- all the sampling,inspection and Wybenga, annual report to be sent to ❑ Priority 2 enforcement follow-up is Christensen EPA by June 30.2000. conducted in accordance with ❑ Priority 3 regulations. Wednesday,June 02,1999 02.56 PM Page 43 of a6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH 8. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Revise Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) to Reflect Newly Revised Local Limits and New Policies Division _ 640 Q1 02 Q3 Q4 ® Priority 1 Le gal counsel revew of revised ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Talebi, 640 Prepare a second draft draft Ordinance and Wybenga, Ordinance to Include legal ❑ Priority 2 recommended changes. Legal Counsel Input. ❑ PriorHy S ® pri�ty 1 Send draft Ordinance to all ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Telabl, 640 Send a draft Ordinance to permiltees for comments. Wybengs permittees for comments. ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Prorty 3 ® Priority 1 Hold meeting with permittess to ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Tdebl. 840 Hold meeting to receive discuss comments and changes. Wybenge public comments. ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Pdortly 3 ® priority 1 Send final draft Ordinance to ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Talebi, 640 Prepare and send final drab RWQCB and EPA for review by Wybenga Ordinance to RWQCB and ❑ Priority 2 March 1,2000. EPA by March 1,2000. ❑ Priority 3 10 Priority 1 Submit,for authorization,final draft ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Talebi, 640 Prepare final revised Ordinance to OMTS Committee Wybenge Ordinance for Board review ❑ Priority 2 and Board of Directors(two and approval. Receive ❑ Priority 3 readings)prior to June 30.2000. Board approval by June 30. Wedme ft,Jm 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 44 of as : I" , U r- 1 I . r - , E -. [-, c_. r- r-r c- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop a Work Stoppage Plan. Division _ 650 .. _ Q7 02 C13 04 ® Priority t Develop a Work Stoppage Plan. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ T.Josway 660 Plan completed. ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop an Emergency Communications Protocol to be added to appropriate section of the IERP. Division 650 Q1 Q2 Q3 04 ® Priority 1 Develop an Emergency ❑ ® ❑ ❑ T.Josway 650 Communication Protocol Communications Protocol to be completed. ❑ Priority 2 added to appropriate section of the ❑ Priority 9 IERP. PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop an EOP on Loss of Telephone Service to Pump Stations. Division _ 650 _ q_q3 94 ropp- PDevelop an EDP on Loss of ]ql ® ❑ ❑ ❑ T.Josway 850 EOP completed. Telephone Service to Pump Stations. riority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Pegg 45 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop Emergency Operatipg Procedures for the Utility Outage Plan Division 650 _ 01 Q2 Q3 04 p Priority 1 Develop supporting Emergency ® ❑ ❑ ❑ T.Josway 850 EOPs are completed. Operating Procedures(EOPs)for ❑ Priority 2 the Utility Outage Plan including: electrical,natural gas,and water at ❑ Priority 3 P1,P2 and pump stations. PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop Inability to Ship Blosolids Plan. Division 650 Q1 Q2 03 Q4 ® Priority t Develop Inability to Ship Biosolids 6d ❑ ❑ ❑ T.Josway 850 Plan completed. Plan. ❑ Priority ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop three EOPs to cover Loss of SCADA Systems. Division 650 Q1 Q2 Q3 W .—.__—..--____... ® Priority 1 Develop three EOPs to cover Loss lid ID T. Josway 850 MlP completed. of SCADA Systems at Plant No. 1, ❑ Priority 2 Plant No.2,and Collections. ❑ Priority 3 Wetneatay,June 02. 1999 02:56 PM Page 46 of as r _ ; I , e r- 1 r-- V r 117--, U u— F—: r_- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop Utility Outage Plans Division 650 01 02 03 04 ® Priority 1 Revise and expand Chapter 5 of L ❑ ❑ ❑ T.Josway 650 Utility Outage Plans are Volume II of the IERP(currently completed. ❑ Priority 2 Electrical Outage)into a comprehensive Utility Outage Plan. ❑ Priority 3 WednWay,June 02, 1999 02:55 PM Page 47 of 86 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I t r % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5% z% 1% 5 z% % 7% 1 1 D83'% 95% Planning and Design Construction Management Q core Businesp ❑ Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events [ l I [ l t ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S l ( l ( f STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete CAD Manual (Carryover from FY 98/99) Division 720 Qt Q2 Q3_Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Complete review and revision of ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Thomsic 720 Publish CAD manual on CAD Manual Intranet by Sept. 1, 1999. 0 Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete Design Manual (Carryover from FY 98199) _ Division 720 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Complete revision of Standard ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Dennis May 720 Publish revised drawing set Drawings(canyover from FY98199) of standard drawings by 0 Priority 2 Sept. 1, 1999. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Complete Phase 1 of Design 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Thomsic 720 Publish draft on Intranet by Manual. Phase 1 includes the Sept. 1. 1999. ® Priority 2 priority sections—The"Core"of the ❑ Priority 3 Design Manual. F1Complete Phase 2 of Design ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Thomsic _�_ 720 Publish on Intranet by Manual:Publish as a revision to February 1,2000. 2 Phase 1 of Manual. Phase 2 includes the balance of the design 3 manual. Wednestlay,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 48 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Complete review of manual. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Thomsic 720 Publish final manual by June Publish final comments and 1,2000. ® Priority 2 revised draft. ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete Policies and Procedures Division 720 01 02 03 04 ❑ Priority 1 Draft, Review,and Approve 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Stewart, 720 Sections A,B,C,D,E Sections A-E. Section-A,B,C- Chaudhry completed 0 Priority 2 Administrative Processes,Section D- Capital Projects, Section E- El Priority 3 Small Project Process. ❑ Priority 1 Draft, Review, and Approve -_ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Stewart, 720 Sections F,G,H,I,J —_--_ Sections F,G,H,I,J.These Chaudhry Completed ® Priority 2 Sections are Special Topics section,Annexation&Special ❑ Priority 3 Maintenance Agreements&Issues. ❑ Priority 1 Complete Sections of Manual that ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Stewart, 720 Completed Sectionsrequire development of NEW Chaudhry ® Priority 2 policies and procedures. (e.g. El Priority 3 EDMS,Library etc.) ❑ Priority 1 Hold Training sessions on ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Stewart, 720 Training Sessions held and Sections F,G,H,I,J,and any Chaudhry for Sections F,G,H,I,J,and ® Priority 2 sections requiring development of any sections requiring "New"policies&procedures. development of"New" ❑Priority 3 policies&procedures Wednesday.June 02.199902:55 PM Page 49 of 86 C- it-- E— U - r I - r- r- r r-- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Hold training Sessions on Sections ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Stewart, 720 Training Sessions for A,B,C,D,&E. Chaudhry Sections A,B,C,D,& E held ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Continue to Improve CIP Budget Procedure Division 720 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 -- — - . _. _.____ .. _ __ - - __._ _.. _Finn ❑ Priority 1 Debrief prior year budget process. 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Stewart 720 Meeting with Finance 0 Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Develop revision to budget model. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Stewart 720 Revised model and procedurea. ® Priority 2 ❑ Priodty 3 ❑Priority 1 Level CIP budget with staffing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Stewart 720 Revised preliminary staffing resources: Develop preliminary plan ® Priority 2 staffing plan for FY 2000/01. ❑ Priority 3 Wedne ft,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 50 of as ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Improve Project Management System Division _ 720 qt g2._g3 0 4 ❑ Priority 1 Review existing procedures and ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Herberg 720 Consultant PSA in place hire consultant for reinvendon 0 Priority 2 effort. ❑ Priority 3 [COI—PP Priority 1 Complete as-is"model of process ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Herberg 720 Completed"As-is"flow charts riority2 riority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Complete"to-be"model with El 6r7 ❑ ❑ Herberg 720 Completed R -0e"o flow reengineered design processes. charts 0 Priority2 Recommend P.M. software ❑ Priority 3 selection. ❑ Priority 1 Prepare detailed written policies ❑ ❑ 0JOHerberg 720 Project Management and procedures for rengineered policies and procedures 0 Priority 2 processes with linear responsibility ❑ Priority 3 charts. WeAwdar,June 02, pap 51 1999 02:56 PM Pa of as V- , r- f-. 1 -__ r- C- U- r r- r- r- r r- r- c e - U__ �- ORGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S t [ t t AN ( l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Revise Standard Specs and convert to CSI Format _Division _ 720 _ 01 02 03 06 ❑ Priority I _Produce final draft of technical 0-0 -❑ 0 Mill" - -� 720 -- Publish draft of specs on specs. Intranet by Dec. 1, 1999, is Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Revise General Provisions of ❑ ® ❑ ❑[MR;;-- 720 I Publish draft of General Specs. Provisions on Intranet by ® Priority 2 Dec 1, 1999. ❑ Priority 3 . __ ❑ply 1 Publish Master Specs and receive ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Mlllea 720 Publish Master Spec on Mal approval from Director of Intranet by February 1. ® Priorty 2 Engineering. 2000. Approved by Director ❑ Priority of Engineering. ❑ prbrilyl — —_ Develop and deliver staff training O=O B� l� Miles �- 70� Training Class. on Master Specs. ® Prloft2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 199902.56 PM Page 52 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Training Program for New Staff Division . 720 _ 01 02 Q3_Q4 ❑ Prior" Draft a training plan for new project ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Herberg. 720 Draft training plan completed. managers. Winsor, Stewart ® Prlority2 ❑ Priority S ❑ pity 1 Finalize training plan for new ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Herberg 720 Training plan finalized project managers. Winsor, Stewart ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 wednesft.Am 02,IM 02-M PM Pape 53 of as t t t t t t 1 I t t t 1 t f f 1 t t 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Expand Expedition Software Program Use Division _ 730 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Study the feasibility of using all ® o ❑ Cervellone and 730 Determine what modules expedition modules. Murthy Would be most ® Pdodty 2 P�orl effective.Drafl memo by tV99 ❑ 3 and final memo by 9/99 with ty recommendations. ❑ Priority 1 Implement new Expedition module ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Murthy 730 Write appropriate directions as noted in feasibility study. for use or the policy and ® Priority 2 procedure by 11-15-99.Start and complete training for all ❑ Priority 3 affected Construction staff by 17_7n-a9 ❑ Nty 1 Add the second module of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Murthy 730 Write directions or policy Expedition as feasibility indicatetl and procedure for use by 2- ® PriorllY 2 21-00.Complete training the ❑ Priority 3 affected Construction staff by 3-24.00. PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Training Program for New Staff Division 730 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 _ __ _ ❑ Priority 1 Draft a traing plan for new ® Cl ❑ ❑ Lee and Kris 730 Drafl an action plan and a Inspectors. responsibility chart by 5-30- OO Priority2 99'_—_..___. . _. ._. . - .._... ❑ Priority 3 — — Wednesday,June 02. 1999 02.56 PM Page 54 or 85 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Draft a training plan for new project 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Haynes and 730 Draft of the action plan and managers. Cervellone responsibility chart by 8-30- 2 Priority 2 99. ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Finalize a training plan for new ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Lee and Kris 730 The training plan will be inspectors. complete with policies and ® Priority 2 procedures, schedules,outline of subjects ❑ Priority 3 and trainers ready for use by ❑ Priority 1 Finalize a training plan for new ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Haynes end 730 The training plan will be project managers. Cervellone complete with policies and ® Priority 2 procedures,schedules, ❑ Priori 3 outtine of subjects,and Priority trainers ready for use by 12- I J 1F Ag Wednesday,June 92,1909 OZ56 PM Page 55 of Be - F- €— E — E .- r-- f— r U-- C— f-- V f r [ C U C - C ORANGE CbUNTYIISANITXTION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Complete Policies and Procedures Division 730 _ Qt 02 Q3 q_4 __ ____ _ ___ _ ___ ❑ Priority 1 Review and approve 2nd hall of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Krill end 730 2nd half of construction construction policies 8 lervellone policies and procedures ® Priority 2 procedures. This 2nd half completed. Includes:Change Orders through ❑ Priority 3 the Deliver and Close-out process. ._ _. :.err_ -�: . __ El Priority 1 Review,and approve 1st half on ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Kne and 730 tst half of construction construction policies and Cervellone policies and procedures Ea Priority 2 procedures. This half includes: completed. Initiating Construction through the ce ❑ Priority 3 Request for Information pross. ❑ Priority t Hold training sessions for tat half ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Me,Cervellone 730 Training sessions for tat half of construction policies and of construction policies and ® Priority 2 procedures. procedures held. ❑Priority 3 ❑ Priority t Hold training sessions for 2nd half ❑ ❑ © ❑ Kne Cervellone 730 Training sessions for 2nd of construction policies and half of construction policies ® Priority 2 procedures. and procedures held. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,Jura e2, ION 02:56 PM Page 56 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: DIG Alert Changes Division_—_—__7-30 _. Q1_ Q2, Q3_Q4 _ _______ ❑ Priority 1 Implement DIG Alert changes. 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Krb 730 Provide Information to DIG Alert. Receive final changes ® Priority 2 in law by DIG Alert.Train ❑ Priority 3 staff on changes. PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Improve Quality Control/Quality Assurance Division 730 Q1 92 03 Q4 D Priority 1 Develop the Field Feedback © ❑ ❑ ❑ Haynes and Ray 730 Revise format and Report for use by all District staff. procedure as necessary to O Priority 2 include all District staff.Comft by 8-2 ❑ Priority 3 99. p Put in use bylete es-30-9. [El Priority 1 Implement Post Completion ® ❑ ❑ es❑ Hayn and 730 Complete draft of the new Inspection. Fisher policy and procedure by 7- Priority 2 30-99.Complete and put the Priority 3 nneew procedure In use by 9-1- Wednesday,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 57 of 88 C f f IF f E C C- C- C- C-- % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type O&M DEPARTMENT 0%5% 1%1% 5% 27% (0 0 71% D90%. O&M Administration O&M Processing Engineering 2% 0% 2% 0% 2% 2% 99% 96% Plant No. 1 Operations Plant No. 2 Operations 0 Core Busines0 ❑ Strategic Goals . Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type O&M DEPARTMENT (corl 2% 8% 2% 0% 11% 16% )87'%1. )82% Mechanical Maintenance Instrumentation & Electrical o% s% 7% 56% 34% 98% Central Generation Air Quality & Special Projects Q Core Business ❑ Strategic Goals Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Asset Management Division 820 01 Q2 03 04 ❑ Priority 1 Assist Maintenance with I ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Esquer 820 Assign stag(Kraemer and management of Asset I Medlanical Engineer) ® Priority 2 Management Implementation ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: J42 Automation Reinvention Effort Division 820 01 02 03 04 ❑ Priority 1 Develop Workshop 2 RI Li ❑ Esquer 820 Recommendation for (PrimaryTreatment) Workshop 2 (Primary ® Priority 2 Treatment)agenda and ❑ Priority 3 Staff to Workshop workshop roster. Assign ❑ Priority 1 Participate in Workshop 2 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Esquer 820 Attend Workshop (Prmary Treatment) Hetherington ® Priority 2 ❑ Prtority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Area 3 Workshop Development D oo iff Esquer J820 Develop Agenda Recommendation and ® Priority 2 Roster for Workshop. El Priority Provide to P&D Division and ritY 3 Persons. Assign staff to Wnrkxhm Wadneaday,June 02,199902-M PM Papa 58 of 88 r-- [- C C r r- C- F- C- C C C C C [ IF C - L vRA14odC6urgTY[bAr4lT&nUN6izsiR[Ji 'zi STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority t Area 4 Workshop Development ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Estiteir Develop Agenda Recomendalions and Roster 0 Priority 2 for Workshop. Provide to El Priori Planning and Design and Priority 3 Parsons. Assign Staff to Wnrkchm FPri,orl'orityty orArea 5 Workshop Development ❑ ❑ ❑ EWEuer Esq 820 Develop AgendaRecommendations and ty 2 Roster for Workshop. Provide to Planning and 3 Design and to Parsons. AsAinn Rfeff in Wnrknhm ❑ PriorityParticipate In In Workshop 3(Area ❑ ® El Esquer -- 820 —__- Attend Workshop w/sta8 — TBD) ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Participate in Area 4 Workshop ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Esquer 820 Attend wakeop w/Slalf (Area TBD) [a Priority 2 El Priority 3 ❑ Priority I = =Participate in Workshop 5(Area ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Esquer �= 820= _ _ Attend Workshop w/Staff TBD) Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,199902:56 PM Page 59 of 66 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Multi-Agency Benchmarking Division 820 C1 02 03 GI _ - _ ❑ Priority 1 Finalize MultiAgency ExecutFre ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Esqux,Collins 820 Distribute final documents. Summary and O&M Volumes ❑ Priority 2 Documents ® Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Organize next MufliAgnecy ❑ ® ❑ JOEs4� 820 Published scope,schedule, Benchmarking Effort and Develop and plan. ❑ Priority 2 Scope for Project ® Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Gather and organize OCSD Coals ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Collirq 820 Costs Reports from FIS end by MultiAgency Template and CMMS organized by ❑ priority 2 Definitions Template. List of costs ® Priority 3 ready to enter into Database. ❑ Priority 1 Assess Database needs or ❑ ❑ © ❑ Esquer,Collins 820 Dlabase updated and modifications required to enter CSDOC data entered. ❑ Priority 2 three years worth of Agency dale. Secure resources required to ® Priority 3 assess and update as required. ❑ Priority 1 ----- Memorandum a While ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Collins 820 PublishedDocument. Paper to EMT with O&M and ❑ Priority 2 overall Agency Cost trends. ® Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,199902.56 PM Page 60 of 86 [ 1 [-- C I- - r— C. U— 117— C— U-- U— [—� U- [-_ [ _. F E--_ E__ I I 1 l I 1 l �1RA,vvc C�,�tJTYlar•1P11T�r rJN Uw fRl�I , 1 I l I 1 I STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Meet with OCSD lead staff and/or ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Esquer,Collin 920 Hold Meeting,publish appropriate EMT members to minutes,and forward OCSD ❑ Priority 2 discuss level of next effort and to requests to Multi Agency recieve input on scope for 99/00 Members ® Priority 3 FY MulliAgency Effort. Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 61 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Provide Resources for Y2K Contingency Planning Division ._820 ___.__.___ 01 Q2 _Q3 04 ® prior 1 Assign Staff for Contingency ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Kmer,rae 820 Staff Assigned. Planning Effort. Halverson ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® vers Priority t Participate in contingency planning ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Halon 820 Provide review comments meeting(s)and provide on draft plan. ElPriority 2 recomendations. Assist in Plan development. ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Y2K Assessments Division._ 820 01 02 03_Q4 ® Priority 1 Complete evaluation of Plant ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Kraemer 820 [Efslabliscompliancestatus equipment for Y2K compliance. remainingplantupiment and publish list. ❑ Priority 3 ® Priority 1 --- Assign Staff to Assessment Effort. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Kraemer 820 - —� Assess staffing needs and request staff. ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 WedneWay,June 02. 19%02:56 PM Page 62 or 66 _ _ _ C � �: [ E. C U C G— r- � C r— C C r— C C i l 1 l l l i URALGE CbUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S l 1 ! [ 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ® Priority 1 Aselgn Staff. ❑ ❑ ❑ Esquer 820 Evaluate request,assign _ appropriate staff,and ❑ Priority 2 provide resources for ❑ Priority 3 successful project. Wedn..ay,June 02.IM 0256 PM Page 63 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Air AS Plant Optimization Study Division_ 828 ._..___ ._—__ Q1 Q2 03 _ ❑ priority t Complete Project Paperwork, ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Kraemer 820 RFP Issued Develop Scope of Work,and Issue ® Priority 2 RFP ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority t Consultant Work ❑ 0-0- ® Kraemer 820 Issue Draft Report of Findings for Optimazation ® p Topty 2 Study ❑ PrbMy 3 Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 64 of as e r- E- IF U- E- r V-- U r c c E_ 11 1 �- cl l l I l I f i uRAlvuc CUuNTYtaNNITAi ION DIS i Ri�I'S i STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Development of Y2K Contingency Plan Division 840 01 Q2_Q3_04 ® Priaily 1 Develop staffing of process control ® ❑ ❑ ❑rHij ,Flnias,Cc840,830,870,88 Plan completed. and recovery plan for the Y2K nes,Joe. 0.820 ❑ Priority2 event. rynski,Krae ❑ Priority 3 0 Priority 1 Have staff trained in the Y2K ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cook,Finias,Hei 840 830,870 88 Staff trained,trial tabletop Response Plan. nz,Jones,Joswe 0.820 run,staff understands their ❑ Priority 2 y,Zorzynski,Krae roles. mer ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 65 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT ANDIOR OBJECTIVE: Develop Interplant cross training program in operations between plants 1 &2 Division_ 840_ ___ ._. __. __..____ _. 01 Q2 Q3 Q4 Elpriority 1 In partership with the 501 Union, 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Cook,Flnise.Hel 830.840 Develop plan Develop and implement interplant nz ® Priority 2 operations cross traing plan ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Establish Training methodology ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Cook,FinHel 830,840 Establish training methods nz ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Pr'" Begin program ❑ ❑ lid ❑ Cook,Finies,Hal 830,840 begin training program nz ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Have one or two staff per plant and ❑ ❑ ❑ © Cook Flnias,Hei 830,840 One or two stall through shift through program nz program ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page as of Be r € IF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JRAvoE CLur1TY'z.ANIAi ION 6i rRII!T'S 1 1 1 1 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Electronic SOP system Division B40 _ W 02 C13 Q4 ❑PHaily 1 Scope completed and RFP sent out ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cook,ReBedge, 840,820,8W Have scope completed and Esquer RFP sent out ® Priority 2 ❑ PNorily 9 ❑ Priority 1 Pick consultant and begin process ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Cook,Ratledge. 840.820,880 Begin assessment process of assessment Esquer ® PrbrNy 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ PrbrBy Have assessment completed, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Cook,ReBedge, 840,800.820 Go out with RFP for full develop scope and RFP for fu0 F�q"Or program ® Zrity2 program development ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Pick consultant for full program ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Cook,Ratledge, 840,880,820 Begin program development development and begin program Esquer ® Priority2 development ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 67 of ee ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Odor Elimination Program Division 840 Q1_Q2 Q3_Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Assist in the development of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cook, Dao, 840,8a0,830 Complete scope,design, capitial projects to acheve goal of Torres,Finias,He start construction ® Priority 2 zero fugitive odors coming from inz the plant sites. Develop operations ❑ Priority 3 protocols, revised procedure's, Ar.1 fM nnrAN Mr im ❑ Priority 1 Ensure that all intern process ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Heinz,Finles, 830,840,880 Have completed by 3rd Qtr. repairs and upgrades and process Cook, Dao, 0 Priority 2 protocols are in place and in use. Torres ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Piping and Valve Signage& Labeling Program Division 840 Q1 Q2 03 04 _ LPPrri01on`:'yy 1 Establish piping and Signage plan 6 ❑ ❑ ❑ Cook,Forman,Fi 830.840,430 Have plan,maps,and and protocols. nias,Heinz method protocol completed. 2 3 ❑ Priority 1 Have 50%of areas and system to ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Cook,Finias,Hei 840,830,430 Have 50%of all areas to be be modified completed. nz,Fonnan modified completed. ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02,190 02.58 PM Pape BB or Be r_ r � r- r- r r , r r r- I l [ l t [ � JRA'vv� C�urlTYtarifJlT�a I fJN �t�i RIC I'J � [ � ` � 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ❑ Priority I Begin actual work programs to ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cook,Heinz Fni 830,840.430 Start of work. effect modifications. as,Fonnan 0 Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ priority I —=—Map plants and establish work ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Forman,Heinz, 830,840,430 Generate map of areas to be schedule. Flnias,Cook tabled and establish work Priority 2 schedule. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 199902:56 PM Page 69 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the Managed Maintenance component of the Asset Management Program for the preliminary, primary and secondary treatment plant processes. Division 850__. ._. Q1. Q2 49� .__ _.. ® Priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Watson, 850 Produce a report In a equipment level maintenance Radka, spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the preliminary treatment Wheeler end identities tasks to be ❑ Priority 3 facilllies.ss equipment at both plant Tucker ask duration,activity acitivly Interval. --- ---] And mrte lute ® Priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Watson, 850 Produce a report in a equipment level maintenance Radka, spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the primary treatment Wheeler,and identifies tasks to be process equipment at both plant Tucker performed,task interval, ❑ Priority 3 facilities. task duration,activity codes And nArI.H.Ain ® priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Watson, 850 Produce a report in a equipment level maintenance Radius spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the secondary treatment Wheeler and identifies the tasks to be process equipment at both plant Tucker performed,task Interval, ❑Priority 3 facilities. task duration, activity codes And nAd.HAN ® Priority 1 Develop or modify the activity ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Watson, 8so Provide a listing of codes and parts lists identified Radka, equipment with completed ❑ Priority 2 during the task analysis of the Wheeler and activity codes,pads lists and preliminary and primary treatment Tucker reference numbers to allow ❑ Priority 3 processes. for a OA OC review by divieinn mannnement Wedheeft.JurepR IONO2MPM Pape 70 a96 1 I 1 1 1 t f uRALUE CbUNTY SANITATION CISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the Operations & Maintenance and Warehouse & Purchasing business practices integration project. (850) Division 850_ Q1 Q2 _Q3_04 ❑ Priority 1 Working with the P&S and W&P ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Watson, 850 Report on group findings Users Group determine how Chapman,Key, and proposed solutions. ® Priority 2 equipment to parts cross Colemonloo ■ Priority referencing can be accomplished and Tucker rity 3 and where the data should reside. ❑ Priority 1 Working with the P&S and W&P ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Watson, 850 Detailed project plan Users Group expand the existing Chapman, Key, defining the tasks that must ® Priority 2 project plan to define the tasks that Colamonieo be accomplished, resources re required to reclassify inventory and Tucker that will be required and the ❑ Priority 3 and standardize nomenclature. schedule that is proposed to rrvnniele rha nrniarl ❑ Priority 1 Working with the P&S end W 8P ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Watson, _ 850 _ Develop a process flow Users Group,develop a process Chapman,Key, chart and responsibility table ® Priority 2 that defines how the O&M planning Colemonloo defining the required steps and scheduling process will and Tucker and responsible party for ❑ Priority 3 function With warhouse and each step In the process. nnrrhaeinn PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the planning and scheduling software module in the computerized maintenance management system. (850) Division 850 01 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Complete testing of the planning ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Tucker, 850 Provide written report on the and scheduling module for Chapman, Key modules ability to meet the ® priority 2 functionality. old Colemonoo requirement of the contract ❑ Priority 3 specifications. Wednesday.June 02, 1999 02,56 PM Page 71 of 88 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Develop maintenance planning ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Watson, 850 Complete draft low charts and scheduling program. Chapman,Key and responsibility tables for 0 Priority 2 and Colamonieo planning and scheduling ❑ Priority 3 process. ❑ Priority t Implement planning and ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Watson, 850 Demonstrate the ability of scheduling program for the Radka. P&S staff to perform the 0 Priority 2 preliminary and primary treatment Wheeler, planning and scheduling plant process areas at both plant Chapman, Key functions using the process ❑ Priority 3 facilities. and Colamonloo low diagrams and rm:nnnnihility tahlee PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE:— ------ —�- - - Provide database reconciliation support between the computerized maintenance management system and the Reinvention Automation Project(J-42). (850) Division _850 07 Q2Q3 04 ❑ Priority t Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Watson,Tucker 850 Reconciled database for information from J-42 with CMMS and Hants each of the identified ® Priorhy 2 information for preliminary,primary process areas in a and secondary treatment plant spreadsheet format. OPrforny3 processes. ❑ Priority 1 Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ O 0 ❑ Watson,Tucker 850 Reconciled database for information from J-42 with CMMS and Harris each of the Identified 0 Priority 2 information for digestion process process areas in a areas at both plant facilities and spreadsheet format. ❑ Priority 3 the effluent pumping process at nlant 9 ❑ Priority 1 Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Watson,Tucker 850 Reconciled database for information from J-42 with CMMS and Harris each of the identified 0 Priority 2 information for the Cen-Gen process areas in a facilities and plant utilities at both spreadsheet format. ❑ Priority 3 plant facilities. WedmWay.Juns 02.1999 02 PM 72 56 01 s6 r- r- � r r._ c r_ c-- r- tr- URGE CbUNTY'SANITATION DISTRICT'S ! AN STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999.2000 RESOURCE PLANNING PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the Managed Maintenance component of the Asset Management Program for the Preliminary, Primary and Secondary treatment plant processes. Division 860 Q1 02 Q3 04 ® Priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Ramey, 860 Produce a report in a equipment level maintenance Charotle, spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the preliminary treatment Cardona, identifies tasks to be ❑ Priori 3 process equipment at both plant Catacutan and performed,task interval, Priority facilities. Tucker task duration,activity codes aW ratmNOR ® Priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ❑ Ea ❑ Ramey, 860 Produce a report in a equipment level maintenance Charette, spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the primary treatment Cardona, identifies tasks to be process equipment at both plant Catacutan and performed,task interval, ❑ Priority 3 facilities. Tucker task duration,activity codes Anrl H.IIAIA ® Priority 1 Perform a detailed analysis of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Ramey, 860 Produce a report in a equipment level maintenance Charette, spreadsheet format that ❑ Priority 2 tasks for the secondary treatment Cardona, identifies the tasks to be process equipment at both plant Catacutan and performed,task interval, ❑ Priority 3 facilities. Tucker task duration,activity codes wd na/c liAtA rPrI.rity rityDevelop or modify the activity ❑ ❑ ❑ © Ramey, Provide a listing of codes and parts lists ident�ed Charette, equipment with completed 2 during the task analysis of the Cardona, activity codes,parts lists and Preliminary and Primary Treatment Cataculan and reference numbers to allow rity 3 processes. Tucker for a QA QC review by nlvininn Mananwannt Wednesday,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 73 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the Operations & Maintenance and Warehouse & Purchasing business practices integration project. Division 860 01 02 03 04 ❑ Priority 1 Working with the P&S and W&P 6ij ❑ ❑ ❑ Ramey, 860 Detailed project plan Users Group expand the existing Thompson and defining the tasks that must ® Priority 2 project plan to define the tasks that Tucker be accomplished, resources are required to reclassify inventory that will be required and the ❑ Priority 3 and standardize nomenclature. schedule that is proposed to rxvnnlete Ina nmler:t ❑ Priority 1 Working with the P&S and W&P ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Ramey, no Report on group findings Users Group determine how Thompson and and proposed solutions. ® Priority 2 equipment to parts cross TlKdcer referencing can be accomplished ❑ Priority 3 and where the data should reside. LPri2 Working withthe P&S and W&P ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Remelt860 A process flow chart and Users Group,develop a process Thompson and responsibility table defining that defines how the O&M Tucker the required steps and Planning&Scheduling process will responsible party for each function with Warehouse& step in the process. PIIMJIRRIIIr1 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Implement the planning and scheduling software module in the computerized maintenance management system. Division 860 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Complete testing of the planning ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Tucker and 880 Provide written report on the and scheduling module for Thompson modules ability to meet the 0 priority 2 functionality. requirements of the contract ❑ Priority 3 specifications. Wednesday.June 02.199902:56 PM Page 74 of 66 r- C- f E r E ! C E < < < < t t URA UE ALINTY!SANITATION DISTRICT'S t [ l STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE ❑ Priority 1 Develop maintenance planning ❑ ❑--a-0 ronin eyand Boo Complete draft flow charts and scheduling program. pson and responsibility tables for ® Priority planning and scheduling ❑ Priority 3 Process. ❑ prwft 1 Implement planning and - - �❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ramey, --- 860 '-- Demonstrate the ability of=_ scheduling program in preliminary Cardona. P&S staff to perform the ®Priority 2 and primary treatment plant Charette, planning and scheduling process areas at both plant Catacutan and functions using the process ❑ Priority 3 facilities. Thompson Bow diagrams and rw .naiihility tahlea PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Provide database reconciliation support between the computerized maintenance management system and the Reinvention Automation Project (J-42) Division 860 Qt 02 03 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Ramey,Lebrun, 860 Reconciled database for Information from J-42 with CMMS Bung!and each of the identified ®Priority 2 information for preliminary, primary Tucker process areas in a and secondary treatment plant spreadsheet format. ❑ Priority 3 processes. ❑Priority I Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Ramey,Lebrun, 880 Reconciled database for information from J42 with CMMS Bmrll and each of the identified ®Priority information for the Digestion Tucker process areas in a process areas at both plant spreadsheet formal. ❑Priority 3 facilities and the Effluent Pumping nrn %q ar nlant 2 ❑ Priority,1 Reconcile equipment and tagging ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Ramey,Lebrun, 860 Reconciled database for information from J-42 with CMMS Bung and each of the identified ® priority 2 information for the Cen-Gen Tucker process areas in a facilities and plant utilities at both spreadsheet format. ❑ Priority 3 plant facilities. Wedrrotlay,June 02,199902:56 PM Page 75 or 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT WORKFORCE PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Provide field walk-down support for the documentation effort associated with the Reinvention Automation Project(J42) Division 860 _ Qt 02_Q3.,_Q4. ❑ Priority 1 Complete the field walk-down with ❑ ❑ ❑ Ramey, 880 Completed set of P81D's and the J-42 consultants and review CLmile and Loop Drawings for the ® Priority 2 loop drawings for the Preliminary, Cardona defined process areas. Primary and Secondary treatment ❑ Priority 3 processes at both plant facilities. ❑ Priority 7 Complete the field walk-down with ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Ramey, 880 Completed set of P&ID's and J42 consultants and review loop Cherelte end loop drawings for the dented ® Priority 2 Drawings for the Digestion Cardona process areas . treatment process at both plants ❑ Priority 3 and outfall facilities at plant 2. ❑ Pity t Complete the field walk-down with ❑ ❑ ❑ ®rCCat=tan mey, t)BO Complete sel of P&ID's and the J-42 consultants and review aretle, too drawings for the ® Priority 2 loop drawings for the Cen-Gen and rdona end Identified areas. utility processes at both plant ❑ Priority 3 facilities. Wednewhe.June 02.199902:55 PM ?a of 88 l t l [ t 1 1 1 [ 1 l 1 [ I [ [ ORANGE COUNTY[SANITA[TION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Provide Y2K field-testing and contingency planning support for plant facilities Imbedded Systems. Division _ 860 _ Q1 Q2 Q3 04 L:dd Provide staff support for ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Jonas and 860 Completion of contingencycontingency planning meetings. Ran" planning document for mtemal systems and imbedded systems. ® Priority 1 Complete Y2K imbedded systems ❑ B If ❑ Kreamer, 8B0 Y21K documentation for remedialion,work arounds and Ramey, imbedded systems ❑ Priorty 2 testing for equipment in the plant Charente, identifying work completed - processes and pump stations. Cardona,and on equipment. ❑Priorty 3 Cataculan ® Ply 1 Evaluate all equipment acquired ❑ ❑ 8 ❑ Ramey, 860 Documentation it the norm through stock and non-stock Kmeme, of an access database that ❑ply 2 purchases for the maintenance Charente, can be made available in a - divisions to determine it the Cardona and word document or ❑ Priority 3 equipment is Y2K compliant. Catacutan - spreadsheet format. Wednesday,June 02, 1999 02:56 PM Page 77 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of Microftltration Technology for application to GWR Project Div_ision. . _ . _880 _. 01.Q2-.Q3 04------_.—�__ __......_...____.. . . ❑ Priority 1 complete Zenon mlcro8lter testing on primary ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Jeff Brown and 880 Complete test plan effluent feed. Ed Torres objectives. ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Start-up Multiple-barrier Micro811er ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Jaff Brown and 880 All equipment installed and Demonstration unit. Ed Torres started. ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Complete Zenon testing for DHS acceptance ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Jeff Brown end 880 Complete DHS approved prto'�y' as Title 22 equivalent. Ed Tortes test protocol. ® Priority,2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Prepare final report on Zenon test program. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Jeff Brown and 880 Report completed. Ed Torres � Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02.190903:09 PM r- ; r U E- U- r - e- �. r- r- r_. r_.i _ r- r r- 1 r _ 1 1 1 [ 1 1 1 oRAI.ocCbuiJTY'tAr4ITiiiONbizIRiCl'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Install and operate a Parametric Emission Monitoring System (PEMS) for the Central Generation System (CGS) engines. Division _ 880 _ __ ___._ Qt Q2, Q3 Q4 O Priority t Certify PEMS on engine/at Plant ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Ed Torres,Vlad 880 and 870 Obtain SCAQMD No.2. Kogan and Vic certification. O Priority 2 Zorzynaki ❑ Priority 3 --------.__ ._.—_._.— --- --- ----- ------.. _.. .------- -. . . .... . __ ---------'- ❑ Priority 1 Complete design for 7 remaining ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Ed Torres,Vied 880 and 870 Design document prepared. engines. Kogan and Vic ® Priority 2 Zorzynski ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Perry 1 Complete Installation of PEMS on ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Ed Torres,Vied 880 and 870 AN sensors and controls all engines. Kogan and Vic Installed. ® Priority 2 Zorzynsld ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Certify PEMS on remaining 7 ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Ed Torres,Vied 880 end 870 Obtained SCAQMD engines. Kogan and Vie certification. ® Priority 2 Zorzynekl ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02, 199902:56 PM Page 79 of Be ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Conduct Phase II Sulfide/Odor Characterization Study for the Collection Systems Division_ 880 01 Q2 Q3 Q4 ❑ Priority 1 Prepare plan to further ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Me:MPdo 880 Test plan completed. characterize sulfide levels in hot ValSoo.Brian 0 Priority 2 spot areas. Reed, Ed Ralledge and ❑ Priority 3 Ed Torres El priority t Complete field Investigation. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ MarcoPolo 880 MI field samples taken. Valasco, Brian ® Priority 2 Reed, Ed Raaedge and ❑ Priority 3 Ed Tomes ❑ Priority 1 Prepare draft report and budget r ❑ ® ❑ MarcaPdo 880 Drag report completed FY recommendations for FY 00-01. Velasco,Brien budget numbers submitted. ® Priority 2 Reed, Ed Redadge end ❑ Priority 3 Ed Tortes ElPriority 1 Prepare Mal report ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 MarcoPolo 880 Final report txunpleted Velaseo,Brian ® Priority 2 Reed, Ed RaBedge and ❑ Priority 3 Ed Torres Wadnesdey,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page 90 of as _ — _ _ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 % of FTEs Dedicated to Work Type INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT 4/e 17% 40% 12%�61% FFFF 22% 40% Customer& Network Support Programming & Database Systems 6% 72% 6% UI I LI-1-1 L I I I I It 56% Process Controls Integration Core Business ❑ Strategic Goals ■ Unplanned Non-Discretionary Events ® Unplanned Discretionary Events f 1 t l 1 1 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S 1 1 1 1 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: FIS Improvements Division _ 930 Q102 g3__Q4, _ ❑ Priority1 OneWorld Financials deployment ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Herrera 930 Conference Room Pilot starts Starts ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Long term vendor selected ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Herrera 930 Purchase Order Created, Financials Completed ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 OndWodd Distribution deployment ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Herrera 930 Conference Room Plot starts Slants ® Priority ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 OneWodd HRIPayroll deployment ❑ ❑ El Herrera 930 Conference Room Pilot starts Starts, Distribution® Priority 2 Completed O Priority 3 Wednesday,June 02.1999 02:58 PM Pape 61 of Be ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Intemet Improvements Division — 930 _ _t]1_Q2 ❑ Priority 1 Order Created 2 Soled implementation vendor ® ❑ ❑ ❑❑ Fiwrera --- 930---------- Purdnase ® Priority ❑PriorLLy 3 ❑ Priority' Internet elb awing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Henere 930 Site active ® Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 PROJECT ARDIOR OBJECTIVE: Security System Improvements Division 930 -_._-_- _— .. Q.Q2 Q3� _ ro ❑ pftft 1 Fire Alarm.CCTV and Security on ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Castillo930 Conducted a centralized console ❑Priority 2 0 Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Integrated Emergency Response ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Castillo 930 rRP Published - Plan updated ❑ Priority 2 ® Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02.19002:56 PM Pepe e2 ote6 _ f- f- f- IF f - [ " ! C— t`_ f-- 1[7- U-- U- f f_ _f E- f < < < Z uRALut C&NTYlIbANITAI IUN DISTRI(!T'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY ❑ Priority 1 Unified security console deployed ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Castillo 930 Gonads In Use ❑ Priority 2 ®Priority 3 PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Y21K Preparedness Division _. 930 _ __ _ _ _ 01 02 G3 00 0 p�Nty 1 Install Y2K-ready software on ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Herrera 930 Upgrades completed server computers ❑ Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ® Ply 1 Install Y2K-ready software on ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Ceslllten 930 Upgrades Completed client computers ❑ Priority2 ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday.June 02. 1999 02:56 PM Page 83 of 86 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop and implement Data Warehouse architectures Division 940 01 02 Q3 04 ❑ Priority 1 Define business requirements for ❑ ❑ ® ❑ James Cong, 940 Detailed prated plan. phase two modification and Chung Nguyen, 0 Priority2 enhancements. Ponsakdi Cady, John Swindler ❑ Priority 9 ❑ Priority 1 Rollout phase two program ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Jarnes&ong, 940 Production release with modifications and enhancements. Chung Nguyen, updated user documentation 0 Priority 2 Pongsakdi and training. Cady,John ❑ Priority 3 Swindler PROJECT ANDIOR OBJECTIVE: Develop and Implement Electronic Document Management Programs Division - —. 940 _ Qt 02 Q3 G4 _ --------,_---_ ❑ Priority 1 Select,purchase,and install the 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Peter Hass 940 Base system installed. hardware and software for J-25-1. 0 Priority 2 ❑ Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Co manage the J 25 1 ® 0 0 ❑ Peter Hass, 940,720 Updated project plane work Engineering EDMS and Facility Dennis May breakdown structure,and 0 Priority 2 Atlas project. status reports. ❑ Priority 3 Wednesday,Jun 02,190902:56 PM Page 84 of88 C C- C C- [ f C- r-' [- 11- C- C L- C- U U IF U f 1 t I t fl 1 1 —RAK.LC&r,TA NITAiioNdiai Rid iJ 1 A 1 I 1 1 STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Develop and Implement Enterprise Wide Geographical Information Systems Division 940 Q1 Q2 Q3 04 ❑ Priority 1 Form the crosa orpanizalbnal GIS ® ❑ ❑ ❑ peter Hess, 940 Project Charter. steering committee. John Swindler, n Priority 2 Patrick Miles ® Priority 3 ❑ Priority1 Initiate the scope of work and the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Peter Hess, 940 Scope of work and RFP RFP for the GIS needs John Swindler draft documents ❑ Priority 2 assessment. ® Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Finalize the scope of work and the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Peter Hass, 940 Final scope of work and RFP for the GIS needs John Swindler RFP documents. ❑ Priority 2 assessment. ® Priority 3 ❑ Priority 1 Award the GIS needs assessment ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Peter Hass, 940 Purchase Order. contract. John Swindler ❑ Priority 2 9 Priority 3 Wednee ft,June 02,1999 02:56 PM Page as of 88 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC GOALS Fiscal Year 1999-2000 HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT AND/OR OBJECTIVE: Y2K Project Division 950 _ Q1 02 03 Q4 __ ® Prbrity 1 Upgrade the Supervisory Contrd ❑ ® ❑ ❑ R.T"pson 950 Systems upgraded per and Data Acquisition systems m manufacturers ❑ ppopty y be Y2K compliant and test U e recommendations and systems to assure predictible testing documentation ❑ Prbrity 3 system response. placed in Y2K ardlive. Wednesday,June 0219990258 PM Page 4ed99