HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-05-26 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
May 19, 1999
NOTICE OF MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
aheh01 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
(714)962-2411
mailing address: WEDNESDAY, MAY 26, 1999 — 7:00 P.M.
Pa Bon 8127
Fcuntain Valley.04
92728-B127 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
sun'
[addrec : 10844 Ellis Avenue
10844 Ellis Avenue
Foantem valley.cA Fountain Valley, California 92708
92708-7018
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date.
i
Member \/
Agencle.
cities Bo�ard Secret ry
anare Brea
Tentatively - Scheduled Uocomina Meetings
eras
Buena Park
Cypress JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
Foantein u nay SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday, May 25, 1999 at 5:30 m. OCWD
Fullerton Y, Y P @
GeMen anve
Hunangtan Beach STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 26, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Ir."m
Le Habra
Le Palma STRATEGIC PLAN
Las Alamitos AD HOC COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 27, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Newport Beach
Orenga
Placende OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
Banta Are Bees Beech TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 2, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Stanton
Tustin PLANNING, DESIGN AND
Ville Perk CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE . Thursday, June 3, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
%rba bran
County or orange FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 9, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
sanitary Districts
Costs Mrs. CHINO BASIN TRIP - Saturday,June 12, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.
Mitlway Gty
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Thursday,June 17, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.
Water Districts
Irmne perch STRATEGIC PLAN WORKSHOP - Saturday, June 19, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, June 22, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 23, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
LEGISLATORS' DAY - Friday, June 25, 1999, at 8:30 a.m.
'To Prefect the Public Health and the Erewenment through Excellence in Wastewater Systems'
6
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
June June 23, 1999
July 'July 21, 1999
August August 25, 1999
September September 22, 1999
October October 27, 1999
November *November 17, 1999
December •December 15, 1999
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
April April 26, 2000
May May 24, 2000
June June 28, 2000
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
r
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 26, 1999 — 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
05/26/99
Page 2 of 7
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
April 28, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/99 04/30/99
Totals $4,108,789.68 $4,358,811.73
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not
specifically removed from same, as follows:
9. Receive and file Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim filed on behalf of
Janarae Lee, and deny Application for Late Claim.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
05/26/99
Page 3 of 7
W
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 26, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO
ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Combined
Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 28, 1999
to be filed.
C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-05, re Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future
Areas to be Served by the Orange County Sanitation District, and rescind
Resolution No. OCSD 98-11.
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re May 5, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 5, 1999 to be filed.
C. Ratify the award of purchase order contracts to various vendors for purchase of
Y2K Noncompliant Lab Equipment (Specification No. E-274) in an amount not to
exceed $475,000 plus tax and freight, in accordance with Resolution
No. OCS098-21, as follows:
-Gas Chromatograph
- ICP-Mass Spectrometer
- Combination Flame and Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometer
-Automated Mercury Analyzer
- Gas Chromatograph - Mass Spectrometer
- Biological Oxygen Demand Controller Software Upgrade
- Controller Board and Software Upgrades for Data Management System
- Controller and Software Upgrades to Segmented Flow Autoanalyzer
- Controller and Software Upgrades to Automated Identification Systems (Vitek)
- Software and Hardware Upgrades to Liquid Chromatography Systems
d. Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside Financial
Corporation (Specification No. L-009.1) for lease of 18.09 acres of land at the
northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain
Valley, for one year.
e. Approve District funding for Cooperative Projects related to inflow and infiltration
reduction totaling $2,257,656 as recommended by the Guidance Review
Committee.
05/26/99
Page 4 of 7
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
May 6, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES-
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
May 6, 1999 to be filed.
C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job
No. J-57, with First Fire System, Inc. authorizing an addition of$6,369 and 35
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $360,710.49; and
(2)Approve a budget amendment of$90,000 for a total project budget of
$650,000.
d. Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer
System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38.3, with Mladen Buntich Construction
Company, Inc., authorizing an addition of$71,597 and 17 calendar days,
increasing the total contract amount to $5,184,355.
e. 1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P141, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44;
Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48;
Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.50;
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-53.2;Tunnel Cover Replacement at
Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at
Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction,
Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,677, increasing the total contract amount to
$9.017,443; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 with Margate Construction, Inc.,
authorizing a deduction of$2,355 for a total contract amount of$9,015,088;
and, (3)Accept Job Nos. P1-41, P1-43, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2,
SP19950021, and SP19950059 as complete, authorizing a Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc.
f. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk
Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor
Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), on file at the office
of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;
(3)Award a contract to Barnard Construction Company, Inc. for Rehabilitation of
the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach
Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R
(Rebid), for an amount not to exceed $7,686,000; (4) Approve a budget
amendment for Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid) in the amount of$806,264 for a
total budget of$9,133,664; and (5)Approve a budget amendment for Contract
No. 3-11 R (Rebid) in the amount of$129,736, for a total budget of$625,936.
05/26/99
Page 5 of 7
g. (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with K.S. Dunbar&Associates
Environmental Engineering to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the
Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not
exceed $156,000; and (2) Direct staff to contact the Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority in an effort to obtain their commitment to share the costs for
the design and construction of the project.
h. Authorize the General Manager to delegate authority to the Purchasing
Manager to negotiate and purchase two 2000 kW Diesel standby generator
systems and associated electrical equipment for Standby Power and Reliability
Improvements for Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total
amount not to exceed $1,300,000.
i. (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Computer Facility Integration
for development of a Computerized Records and Drawing System, Job
No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $2,303,683; and (2)Approve
Professional Services Agreement with FM International to provide technical and
project management assistance for Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to
exceed $243,000.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance. Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re May 12, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 12, 1999 to be fled.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1999.
d. Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report
for the period January 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999.
e. Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for
the period ending March 31, 1999.
f. Authorize the selection of a new Medical Insurance Company to replace United
HealthCare's Point-of-Service Plan and PacifiCare's Health Maintenance
Organization Plan effective July 1, 1999.
g. Receive and file correspondence from Rutan & Tucker dated May 18, 1999, on
behalf of ProLogis Trust(formerly Security Capital Industrial Trust).
h. Approve in concept the substantive provisions of a District Ordinance
establishing a Comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance.
1. 1) Direct staff to prepare a comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
Ordinance for introduction and first reading at the regular meeting of the Board
of Directors on June 23, 1999; 2) Provide public notice; and 3) Schedule a
public hearing on the proposed Ordinance at the regular meeting of the Board
of Directors on July 21, 1999.
05/26/99
Page 6 of 7
i
j. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-06, urging the California Legislature to modify
the "County Sanitation District Acr to increase the maximum monthly
compensation allowed for Directors, under the same or similar provisions as
allowed for Directors of Water Districts and Utility Districts.
15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re May 3, 1999 and May 25, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 3, 1999 to be filed.
C. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Eisenberg, Olived and
Associates for the preparation of a Health Risk Assessment in connection with
the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to
exceed $225,690. with costs to be shared equally with the Orange County
Water District.
d. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications for
public relations services for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the
Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to
exceed $199,895 with costs to be shared equally with the Orange County Water
District.
16. (1)Approve the plans and specifications and Addendum No. 1 for RA 6 "B" Street and
Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, on file at the office of the
Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)
Award a contract to Mladen Grbavac Construction, for RA 6"B' Street and Mitchell
Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, for an amount not to exceed
$191,604.
17.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
05/26/99
Page 7 of 7
1. Confer with General Counsel re David Deese v. County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 786591 (Government Code Section 54956.9.
2. Confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation District No. 3 v.
United Technologies Corporation, et al., Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 722816 (Government Code Section 54956.9).
3. Confer with General Counsel re Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation
Districts, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680
(Government Code Section 54956.9).
4. Confer with District's Negotiator re pending MOU Labor Negotiations with
S&PMT Group (Government Code Section 54957.6).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
18. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
21. Adjournments
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of
business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
H:\w Aal geMa�Bwrd Agendas%l9 Swrd AgeMas`D526.99.A
ROLL CALL
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: May 26, 1999 TIME: 7:00 p.m.
(SIMONIAN) ....................ANDERSON...................
�C �G —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................
� —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... ✓ ✓ — —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................✓ ✓ _
(DOTSON) ....................--BeNAI WE--................. / ✓ —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ _
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................
y —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... ✓ ✓
(WISNER)......................... GULLB 8N ............... ✓ i —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... C✓ C✓ —
(MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... ✓ — —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. i ✓ _
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. i_ -daa,42/Qo?
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ _� —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................✓ —� — —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA...........................
w — —
(SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... ✓ ✓ — _
(MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ —
(BATES)........................... SYLVIA.......................... G ✓ —
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... c✓ —
STAFF:
Anderson
d Hodges
ess
✓
Kyle ✓ �e
Luc in ✓
McIntyre ✓
Miles ✓
Ooten ✓
Peterman
Streed
Tuchman ✓
OTHERS: AdpobE�
Woodruff ✓ 44p eel
Andrus Q
03/24/99
H:Nvp.dla�adminIBSXDIRECTOR'Dteclma Rol CelLdw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: �/ 5 AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print)
119ME ADDRESS: 1 .-k, LL Lit I I A, 1vj
(number/street) 3 I
_ C sF ,tide CA " "
Fury/Lp code)
TELEPHONE: _�'�t�J 6�f-( -. 3•{ -E 1
REPRESENTING:
(self/name organization) rry
\4admwat 1W,P.tltaWmiMHSTORMSVRequW to SpMUM 7—,,-o
N1WRDMADMINIBSIFORMSISIGN-IN FORM.DOC
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: �/ AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) Q//1� /�.
Ii9ME ADDRESS �0 7�J > 1 , ._te c L.L. r (., it /iL�C3Ivel 114-�` FIvuJ<
(number/street)
G F� ,til�x (A 9 ""
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: ( '-7,j ) 6`r1 ' 34-f I
REPRESENTING: pi-0 (oc 1 w.-✓—
(self/name organization)
\Yadonbatal\wp.tlt WmintBS1FORMS\Request to Speak.dac ..s:•(
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint)
/ leaseprint)
Sc.0 l ✓l 1 YI PPS
1AVA_' Li C S p
v,e WoodSih L,,6 MesA SA„, A. -blatrld-
HAWP.OTAV DMIN%WXF0RMS0lGN-IN FORM.D
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on 19zz was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on_Azt, 02,? 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
Penny M. I le, Se ry
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HAW P.OTA\AOMIN\BSV0RMS\FZ7A
" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
May 19, 1999 Board Secretary
phone: To the Chair and Members
(7143 962 2411 of the Board of Directors
m pl0.B.812i Subject: Board Letter
Pounealn volley.CA
9272e-9127
e add.:venue"Eft The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
Fcuntaln valley CA information on any of the items, please call me.
9270e-701e
June 19 Board Workshop on Strategic Plan
_Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIRI
Member
Agencies An informational workshop will be held on Saturday, June 19, to discuss the draft
0 program EIR. Staff will request authorization to circulate the Draft EIR for public
cities comments at the June 23 regular Board meeting. The June 19 workshop will focus on
Anaha. environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR, with
Brea emphasis on the level of treatment and emergency use of the 78-inch outfall.
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Uelley
F"Harm" Kenn County Biosolids Ordinance Update
Garden Grove
Hundngton Beech
Irvine Kern County is still in the process of developing a permanent ordinance to regulate the
Le Habra
La Palma land application of biosolids. This process began in the fall of 1996 with the most
Los Alamitos recent official action occurring during the summer of 1998, when the Board of
Nenpart eealth Supervisors adopted an interim urgency Biosolids Ordinance. This interim Ordinance
Pla aqua is the current ordinance that governs land application activities in Kern County.
senor Ana seal Batch Because it is an interim Ordinance, it can not be permanent and is set to expire on
Stanton January 12, 2000.
7u.tid
Vile Park
varoe Linda To have sufficient time to complete environmental review prior to the January 2000
county of orange expiration date and avoid a lapse in regulatory authority, Kern released a draft
permanent Biosolids Ordinance (Ordinance)on May 14, 1999. Despite numerous
9.nit.ry Districts comments, debates by scientific experts, volumes of supportive literature submitted,
and support from EPA Region IX (attached)this Ordinance includes several regulatory
costa mass provisions that would have an immediate adverse impact on biosolids use in Kern
Midway City County, including a ban of Class B biosolids in three years.
Water Districts
Irvin Pancn This Ordinance will be used as a project description for environmental analysis under
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). The CEQA Early Consultation period
for commenting agencies and persons will conclude the first week of June 1999. Kern
County has scheduled five public workshops in May in order to receive public
comments on the Ordinance. District's staff will be in attendance at all of the
workshops to provide information and rebuttal if necessary.
'To Protect the Public Health end she Envtranment Mraugh Excellence in Wastewater 9yatems'
• Members of the Board
Page 2
May 19, 1999
District's staff and Counsel will review and comment on the Ordinance. They will
continue to review all avenues available in order to develop a reasonable Ordinance
that will allow for the continued land application of biosolids in Kern County.
Tule Ranch Acquisition Status (Mostly in Kenn County and Partly in King County)
District's staff and consultants have been addressing numerous issues to determine if
Tule Ranch is an appropriate site for the long-tens management of the District's
biosolids. Local consultants have been contacted to provide due diligence services
related to title search, appraisal, environmental review, permitting, regulatory
compliance, surveying, water rights determination, land acquisition requirements,
management strategies and options, and land development costs, and public
acceptance recommendations.
Results from a preliminary environmental site assessment did not reveal any significant
concerns regarding endangered or threatened species on the site. Consultation with
the Kern County Water Agency and Semi-Tropic Water Agency have revealed an
adequate supply of water for fanning the site. Staff is reviewing the geographic
information system (GIS) overlays for the permitted biosolids land in Kern County from
the Kern County Agricultural Commissioner's office to delineate flood plains, water
district and water bank areas, and depth to ground water.
Currently, regulatory issues raise the most serious concems about the acquisition of
Tule Ranch. Tule Ranch operations will be controlled by three different state and local
regulations that are not yet finalized: the statewide biosolids General Order, the Kern
County Biosolids Ordinance, and the Kings County Biosolids Regulation. Staff,
District's Counsel, and consultants have reviewed drafts of these documents and
expect the Kern County Biosolids Ordinance to present significant issues that need to
be addressed prior to purchasing Tule Ranch.
A detailed report on the Tule Ranch due diligence progress will be provided at the June
2"" OMTS Committee meeting.
Final Effluent PAH Exceedence
The District's February monthly final effluent discharge sample exceeded its ocean
discharge permit limit of 1.59 µg/L(parts per billion)for polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons(PAHs). The exceedence of 4.1 µg/L was reported in the District's
February 1999 Discharge Monitoring Report(DMR), but staff did not notice the
exceedence until after the DMR was submitted on April 14. 1999. No PAHs were
detected in March, but because of the District's method of calculating 30-day averages,
the 4.1 µg/L PAH value will also be reported in the March 1999 DMR. Therefore,
March will also have a PAH exceedence.
In order to investigate the source of the PAHs, staff has started a trunkline sewer
monitoring program as well as increasing the influent and effluent monitoring to four
times per month. To prevent future human-error oversights, staff has added
automated e-mail alerts to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) that
Members of the Board
Page 3
May 19, 1999
will flag staff when results are above permit limits. In addition to the usual individual
reviews of the DMR, staff will also use a team-review session to critique the document
before it is submitted to the regulators.
High Surfzone Bacteriolooical Results
On Thursday, April 29, 1999, the District's beach monitoring data indicated high
bacteriological counts for total coliform, fecal col'rform, and enterococci at almost all
stations from Huntington Beach to Newport Beach (south of Newport Harbor). Most of
the bacteriological indicators returned to background levels by the next regular
monitoring day, May 1, 1999.
In order to investigate the cause of the event, staff will be reviewing various oceanic
parameters. The Dishict will be performing 5-days per week offshore monitoring until
the Memorial Day weekend to determine whether our effluent plume is moving toward
shore. Starting that weekend the District's shoreline sampling frequency increases to
5-days per week from the current schedule of three days per week.
Contractor Parking Lot at Plant 1
Two weeks ago the District was approached by Eller Media, Inc. about the possibility of
renting a small parcel of land from the District The property in question is the area at
the south end of Plant 1, commonly referred to as the Contractor Parking area. The
area is a fenced in area,just outside of our entrance gate off of Garfield Avenue. The
parcel is approximately 109 x 100' in area.
Eller Media is interested in this parcel of land as a temporary storage facility. They
recently received a contract from the City of Huntington Beach for the removal of
approximately 235 bus stops. Their contract with the City allows them 45-60 days to
remove all of the bus stops. They intend on using the site as a temporary storage
area. They will remove the bus stops from the city and relocate them to our site
(temporarily) until they can dispose of them. On May 18, 1999, we entered into a
rental agreement with Eller Media with duration, not to exceed 1-year at $500.00 per
month.
Honda Stops EV Production Edison EV Folding
American Honda Motor Company has stopped production of its EV Plus, becoming the
first major automaker to give up marketing efforts for costly battery-powered electric
cars. After spending hundreds of millions of dollars to develop storage battery
technology, the auto industry is starting to"pull the plug.' Honda's decision to cease
production is one of the strongest indications that this once-promising technology is
failing to win over consumers.
1 Members of the Board
Page 4
May 19, 1999
Honda reports that the EV Plus has outlived its usefulness as a research platform and
points out that Honda met the spirit and intent of agreements with the ARB to lease
300 EVs over three years (which they have done). Thad Malesh, an alternative fuel
specialist at J.D. Power&Associates said of Honda's decision, "they're certainly being
more honest than anyone else about electrics, these vehicles are just not acceptable to
the consumers.
In another blow to the EV industry, Edison International reported that they are closing
the doors of their Edison EV subsidiary due to poor public acceptance of the vehicles.
Edison EV has installed approximately 250 charging stations in CA and AZ.
Chino Basin Trip -June 12
Six Directors expressed an interest during the April Board meeting in touring Chino
Basin and the surrounding area on Saturday, June 12. Since we will be taking the
District's bus, there is still opportunity for all Directors to attend. We will be leaving the
District at 9 a.m. and should return to Fountain Valley around 2 p.m. Along the way we
will tour the Water District's spreading basins in Anaheim, visit a windrow composting
site and drive through the wetlands. Directors will also have the opportunity to see the
many dairies in Chino and to observe the impacts of the unsewered dairy area. A visit
to Prado Dam, where we will have lunch, is also on the itinerary. If enough Directors
are interested, we will have a separate car available to go to the Eastside Reservoir
Project in Hemet. If you would like to participate in this outing and did not express an
interest during the April Board meeting, please call Michelle Tuchman, 593-7120, by
Wednesday, June 9.
Legislators' Day is June 25
Our second Legislators' Day will be Friday,June 25. from 8:30- 11:30 a.m. Staff and
guest speakers will be discussing the California water situation and how it impacts
Orange County, the growth projected for our County and associated infrastructure
needs, and the programs and services planned by the Sanitation District to meet the
various challenges before us. Members of the Washington and Sacramento legislative
delegations and their field representatives have been invited as well as all Orange
County electeds, city public works staffs and the general managers of the special
districts in our service area. The two-hour program will be followed by tours of the
plant. If you are planning to attend, please RSVP to Suzanne Smith, 593-7123.
Odor Complaints from
Huntington Beach Residents
Two odor complaints were received recently from Huntington Beach residents living
across the street from Plant 2. According to our procedures of our zero-tolerance odor
program, staff responded immediately and, in both instances, the problems were
corrected by adding more bleach to the processes in question.
Members of the Board
Page 5
May 19, 1999
The Dairy Washwater Pilot Project
The District is working with staff from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
(SAWPA), the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, and the Milk Producers Council on a pilot
project to divert washwater from several dairies in the Chino Dairy Preserve into the
SARI line for final treatment and disposal at the District's facilities. The SARI line was
built to convey high salt wastewaters from the inland counties of Riverside and San
Bernardino to the District's treatment plants. Salts in water tend to deteriorate the
quality of water because they accumulate over time. Dairy washwater, produced within
dairies during the necessary cleaning of cows and milking equipment, contains large
amounts of salts and nutrients. Both salts and nitrates are impacting the underlying
soil and groundwater in Chino Basin, posing a great threat to the Santa Ana River as a
water resource to Orange County.
Attached for your review is an article on this project that appeared in the Ontario Daily
Bulletin on Monday, May 17"'. Staff expects the first dairy to by connected to the SARI
line by July 1, 1999.
Newspaper Articles
The attached newspaper articles include a column by Bill Borden,who writes for the
Fountain Valley View and the Huntington Beach Wave, local-section inserts of the
Register. According to Mr. Borden, the article he wrote about the Groundwater
Replenishment System was meant as a "tongue-in-cheek" look at the project. To
better familiarize Mr. Borden with the GWR System and our operations, John Collins
and staff toured Mr. Borden through the plant and later went to the Water District for a
presentation on the water reclamation project and a tour of Water Factory 21.
According to a fax subsequently received by John Collins, Mr. Borden will be writing
another column in June that'will explain the process more reasonably and fairly.'
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald/Mcintyre
General Manager
DFM:Ih
H:\wp.dta1admin\31Me1lerl8oard Letter.May 19 1999 doc
Attachments
............. ..... ..ter., . _ . . . _
stockTake • e
71
r laveyansaYaxi �1 l�_d..f 'f�Gorecasl
Cholesterol Dairy manure will be
MOaECAt aFP0eT9TDe169
osteoporosis pumped down sewers to calpem boost prices
Testing at Your for'Siar Wars'tickets
Local Store improve water quality an eve-of o enin
tl rk ic,°to,
Questions about lab
_ ONTARIO, Calif. (AP) -- Six dairies will soon security follow
be connected to sewer lines so manure can espionage scandal
be pumped to a treatment plant under a pilot EPA says dioxin
°„ program to improve water quality in three polluting San Francisco
_ ryour Southern California counties. Bay
in PeVT, av gentontesury. CNET launches auction
E }}! The San Bernardino County Dairy Preserve, site for technology
ea an o W which produces a quarter of the state's milk, products
of today's_Beeston-es. is the largest source of salt pollution in San Nine ell's Angels
Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties, sentenced in
9 Motorcycle Week riot
e vu-mews ,,n the Regional Water Quality Control Board
wnn sachee saner". said. Satellites to study
ionosphere
,test
defense
At least six dairies south of Chino and communications
cut-omatirali
Ontario will be connected to sewage lines Warren named ASCAP
r starting in July and the manure will travel songwriter of the year
BY KEMBEE ewssFascx with human waste to an Orange County united ways mail
BY KEYWORD: g •1
Sanitation District plant in Huntington Beach. delivers bio San Joaquin Valley suroriseia
million-dollar check
Salts in manure are washed onto soil and news briefs
Advmced search. seep into ground water and the Santa Ana
sear—T.hJips, River. The more salt the dairies produce, the clothes in who
of off
more expensive R is to purify water for innocent to lewd
human consumption, said Sanitation District conduct
spokesman Blake Anderson.
"By sending that down to Orange County, ore...
they'll see what it takes to get that down Q
there to see if it's applicable to get the salts
out of the preserve," said Bob Feenstra,
executive director of the Milk Producers
Council, a trade group of dairy owners.
The program will handle only the waste and milk that spills on the
floor of the milking rooms, not all of the dairy waste. The rooms are
rinsed regularly with each cow translating into roughly 75 gallons of
wash water a day.
There are 300,000 milk cows in the dairy preserve.
The water currently washes into drains goes into catch basins on
http://www.sacbee.com/news/calreport/calrep_story.egi?N87.HTML 5/18/99
the dairies. ...b. _ ... _
Another program to clean up water began last year, when the Inland
Empire Utilities agency agreed to take 150,000 tons of manure to
process and sell as fertilizer. The manure usually piles up at dairies
or is spread on adjoining fields.
Every ton of manure removed from the preserve takes 154 pounds
of salt out of the water supply, according to the agency.
Problems?Suggestions?Let us MwAwyw. I Copyr1gM671m Sam M Bea ,
http:/Awww.sacbee.con/news/cdreport/calrep_story.cgi7N87.HTML 5/18/99
�rrlrr.«.j. Kern County law may ban sludge fertilizer
PmnJ xr"nd1Y.1]-011p"9
04:56a1 POT
Jump lines This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press May 17, 1999.
Ads
News
Past issues By MICHAEL BITTON
The valley Press Valley Press Staff Writer—
BA ERSFIELD -Spreading a sewage treatment bypr uct m—agnc �Irzer
FIRST VALLEY may be banned in Kern County by 2003.
David Price, director of the Kern County Resources Management Agency, recently
completed a draft of a new ordinance for the use of biosolids,or the sludge-like
cake left over after the sewage treatment process.
MEDICAL GROUP Price said a new ordinance must be adopted before the county's existing biosolids
ordinance expires on Jan. 12, and that an outright ban within three years is
News recommended in the draft ordinance to be considered.
Newsroom
JeWa,ek page
1999 schedule The ban was proposed by a group of farmers opposed to the use of sludge for what
Nologypage they consider possible impacts to health and water quality.
Obituaries
Poppy page Other options would have allowed the continued use of sludge to fertilize crops not
Special reports P g AV courthouse for human consumption,and to allow only a"cleaner" grade of sludge into the
Edwards/Eglin county.
Palmdale airport
School sum
Reunions "There is a certain amount of polarization on this issue," Price said. "It's tough
See it here because 1 think all parties involved are working under deeply held convictions.
Starr report Some believe the stuff is fine,others do not."
Weather
1998 Review Price said he tried to find a compromise for all parties involved,but stressed that
Ads there is no wa} to make everyone happy.
Classified index
Announcements If the ban is adopted as proposed, the use of all sewage sludge would be banned in
Choice Encounters e P Po 8 B
Em Ip ovmem three years, Price said. There would be no grandfather clause to allow continued use
Farm garden,pets of sludge by anyone using it now.
Financial
Merchandise Even though the current biosolids ordinance doesn't expire for seven months, Price
Personersonry notices 8 P
Pals said he wants to get a draft ordinance to the Kern County Board of Supervisors by
Real estate sales August for possible approval.
Rentals
Transportation A serif public meetings after comment are scheduled later this month. The
Placing ads es of g to 8
Classified only Antelope Valley hearing will be at 6 p.m. Wednesday, May 19,in the
Retail display recreation building at the park on O Street in Mojave.
On line
Directories Mary K. Shell,spokeswoman for the Kern Food Growers Against Sludge, said her
Auto Dealers group was incensed when a draft of the ordinance was released last month that
Nome Services would allow"Class B" sludge,which contains more germs than the currently
Local Web sites allowed "Class A" sludge.
Past issues
Sunday "After all these months of supposed participation,the draft still didn't address the
Monday threat to groundwater," Shell said. She's much happier with the ban,as proposed in
Tuesday a draft released this week.
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday The Board of Supervisors could vote on the new ordinance as early as August,Price
Saturday said.
Search Manday new�age
News p e 5/18/99
http://www.avpress.com/r-/mOstYl Sits
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # I Date Subject
7 01/�J I
Is it really a good idea to drink recycled toilet water?
Ihope that someone who Perhaps I have oversimplified and disinfectant technologies to
knows what the new this matter.After all I am not a purify the water."
microbiologist—I'm just a guy :{•'' I''" ' `. The water will then be sent to
Groundwater Replenishment who knows the difference Anaheim for another super-
System is really all about will between a toilet and a sink.The scientific purification before it is
write and tell me that I'm smart people who wrote the two 1� allowed to percolate down into
intellectually upside down on ,pamphlets I'm looking at have the water table.
this issue. The reassuring document
Here's how I see it now.The -done a great job in dressing up claims that it will be"filtered
Orange County Water District is this metamorphosis from effluent naturally,just like rainwater."
throwing a little scare in to us to tap water.but l am still locked Wail a minute.It ain't exactly
about the water supply.In a into an evidently non-scientific Bill Borden rainwater.We know what it is
current publication they claim phobia when it comes to AS 1 SEE IT and no matter how many times
that"water could become a consuming human waste matter, we reverse osmosis it,it still is
scarce commodity in Southern recycled or not. what it is,not rainwater.
California."They go on to point The Groundwater
out that we are averaging only Replenishment System folks Over the next 20 years we will
about 13 inches per year and that assure us that they will"lake be spending about$400 million
we are forced to import our highly treated wastewater,from on this project and no matter
water from Northern California the Sanitation District . . , and how successful the districts,
and the Colorado River. process it through an advanced water and sanitation are in
They claim further that treatment facility using securing grants,it is we who shall
. these sources are microfsllration,reverse osmosis pay to drink this recycled toilet
becoming increasingly water.
unreliable."
OR,I'm worried.What are we
going to do about it? Bin Bord.W.As I Sea Ilcolumn is a
Well,the OC Water District regular feature of The View's sister
and the County Sanitation publication,the Huntington Beach
Districts of Orange County have wave.Email him at
arrived at a swell plan called the Mbordenru.aol com
Groundwater Replenishment
System.I don't have to tell you
what the Sanitation District
does,do 1?That's where the
water and other sluff go after it
is nushed down our toilets.
Please somebody tell me that
they do not plan to clean this
sluff up and redirect it into my
faucets.
MS
f a. 018011110RANGIECOUNTY NEWS. HE:LP.J
THE CLASSIC WHITE BUTTON- DOWN '
e nes a=y, 1Vr1TrD, 1�StS4
Court Urged to Unveil Merrill Testimony
■ Bankruptcy: Media lawyer addresses justices. Brokerage says papers
should be secret since no charges were filed.
By NANCYH/LL.HOL7ZMAN Times Sta$Wrtter
n attorney for the Los Angeles Times and other media
• groups urged the California Supreme Court to release
RELATED grand jury testimony about the Orange County
O.C.SECTIONS bankruptcy Tuesday, but lawyers for the county's brokerage
MAIN PAGE house warned that disclosure would harm innocent people and
undo centuries of common law.
NEWS BY The key legal issue before the court is whether a trial judge
COMMUNITY has the power to release grand jury testimony in cases in which
SPORTS an investigation does not lead to an indictment.
That was the situation in Orange County, after then-Dist.
PREP SPORTS Arty. Mike Capizzi.cut off the probe after reaching a$30-
million settlement with the county's main broker, Merrill
BUSINESS Lynch&Co.
SO CAL LIVING Capizzi's successor, Dist. Any. Anthony J. Rackauckas, said
Monday that he favors full release of the documents, as occurs
CALENDAR when the grand jury brings criminal charges.
But Merrill Lynch attorneys pointed out that typically, if no
CALENDAR indictment is brought,witnesses'testimony remains secret.
WEEKEND After the settlement,media organizations sued for the
HOME DESIGN documents related to the 1994 bankruptcy.
Noting that the bankruptcy cost taxpayers more than$1.6
COMMENTARY billion, Orange County Superior Court Judge David 0. Carter
T.V.TIMES ruled in 1997 that the public has a"compelling and
fundamental right" to know what went wrong.
That right outweighs the general policy of grand jury
secrecy,the judge said.
The 4th District Court of Appeal agreed with Carter. Merrill
ADVERTISEMENT Lynch appealed to the Supreme Court,which has 90 days to
issue a decision.
The case involves 29 Merrill Lynch employees who testified
before the grand jury probing the cause of the bankruptcy,
News Speaking on behalf of Merrill Lynch,Robert G. Morvtllo
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0PANGE/t000040412.htrni 5/5/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject I
Los Angeles Times y ��� �
i
Release Bankruptcy Testimony, Rackauckas Says
■ Finance: State Supreme Court will hear arguments on Attorneys for Merrill Lynch will eluding The Times,have fought for
disclosing grand jury transcripts on D.C.'s fiscal Crisk argue mday before the jugicss in public release of the transcr:pm
San F4ancisco that releasing the The testimony was, ordered re-
Monday, reversing the position of transcripts would invade the pri- leased by then-Superior Cour:
By JEAN O.PASCO vary of people who were not Judge David O.Carter,but Capin
TIMES aTArr WRM his predecessor, Mike Capizzi, indicted. They argued in court refused and Merrill Lynch ap-
whom he replaced in January.
More than Wit pages of grand Rackauckas said papers that the release of witness pied the decisam.
jury tostimmly,eaaminmg the role taxpayers and testimony would overturn a cen- The 9th District Court of Appea:
jury
Merrill Lynch ac Co. ta Orange other "should be able to eamme tury-old practice of keeping grand later ruled that Carter had :he
of MerrCounty'il 1991 h&Co.bankrup in should the record' of what led to the jury proceedings secret unless authority to release the transcnpu.
be made public, Orange County co'mty's loss of$1.64 billion When there is an indictment. The state attorney general's cf-
Dist.Ally:Anthonyic, .n e County its twomveslment funds collapsed. rice under former Any. Gen. Dac
YThe grand jury alcuptly ended Lungren sided with Capism. and
said as the California Supreme Merrill Lynch sold most of the its investigation in June 1998 after continues to oppose the release o:
Court prepared to hear oral argu- risky securities to former Orange Capin accepted a$M-million set- the transcripts under Atty. Gen.
menu in the case today. County Treasurer Robert L Cit- dement from the investment gianL Bill Lockyer, said Gary Schams
"it Is in the public interest to ran, who resigned in the wake of
unseal the transcripts and make the bankruptcy and eventually Attorneys for a coalition of 'senior deputy assistant attorney
them available," Rackauckas said pleaded guilty to felonies. newspapers and media entities,in. general in San Dregs
Home age m
,'.. Lnews
. acraglstncmM rxEpitiwae couxry Rectsrm ,. [ xEtP' I ..SWtal
world
HOME PAGE
TODAYS NEWS
Rio Is forced to dump raw sewage F.t P°g°
Ca
into sea Nation '°
-Word
ARCHIVES
ENVIRONMENT: The resulting stench at the city's aIESSSN FINANCE
famed beaches has the local tourism industry CLASSIFIED
. COLUMNS
reeling. COMMUNITY NEWS
CRIME&COURTS
May 1, 1999 EDUCATIONEMPLOYMENT
ENTERTAINMENT&
By PETER MUELLO FUN&EGAMES
The Associated Press HEALTH&FITNESS
LIBERTY ONLINE
RIO DE JANEIRO,Brazil—If the girl from Ipanema walked POLITICS
&HOPPING
to the beach these days, she'd likely turn around and walk right GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE
back,holding her nose. SCIENCE&
TECHNOLOGY
SERVICES&
With a major sewer line under repair,the city is dumping tons PROMOTIONS
of raw sewage into the ocean along Rio's most fashionable SPORTS&&RECREATION
WEATHER
beaches,creating a foul-smelling brown stain thafs a
nightmare for a city that thrives on tourism.
Tourists riding the cable car up the famed Sugarloaf Mountain
can see the fetid sewage discharging at the mountain's base as
it spreads into the sea toward Copacabana beach. A few miles
down the coast,another pipe poking out of a hillside of
coconut and banana trees spews a torrent of dark water into the
surf below,sending an evil-smelling cloud past the beach-front
hotels toward fashionable Ipanema and Leblon.
"It hit us coming in. The smell was just awful," said Gregory
Tennyson of Diamond Bar, gazing out the huge picture
window of his luxury hotel. .
"We had a room with a nice view of the ocean,but we changed
it for one in the back," he said. "This is our first time in Rio,
and probably our last."
The problem was created by the decrepit sewage pipe that
tames untreated waste from the city's residential South Zone
and dumps it far out at sea. In January, a pillar supporting the
pipe collapsed, and an inspection showed that others were
about to give way.The state water utility, CEDAE, built four
new pillars, but a 165-foot section of pipe had to be replaced.
The government oil company Petrobms,experts at offshore
drilling,supplied a barge and divers to work on the pipe,
http://www.ocregister.com/search/19990501/news/lbeach.shtud 5/3/99
� . ..�. .�v vv�AI l LY V"§ uLQuvtt ✓JJL1 IL L�
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject 11
Los An Times
�1 ,�r « IIII
ANAHEIM
A month after the city Council
tabled a vote to rep0al or revlae the
city"campaign contributions law,
the city attorney a office will host a
public workshop on the ordinance
today at 3 pm in council cham-
bers. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. last
month, Councilwoman Shirley
McCracken cited the need for more
Information and time to consider
alternatives to the ordinance,
adopted In 1993,which limits indi-
vidual campaign contributions to
$1,000 for local candidates and
allows a special prosecutor to in-
vestigate allegedabuses of the law.
The ordinance triggered a bitter
115-year scandal after McCracken,
Mayor Tom Daly and Councilman
Frank Feldhaus were accused of
violating city and state campaign
contribution lawn in the 1996 elec-
tion. The charges against Daly
were eventually dismissed;
McCracken and Feidhaus paid
finee to the city.
—Crytla!tivrtoe,(1111966•iatf
.riaitt�C % .uumy ciannation ulstncts
Newspaper Clippings
a
of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
eles Times
MWD Running Out of Time
The Metropolitan Water District of retorted with a barnyard expletive.
Southern California is in the vortex of a de- The good news is that the MWD has a new
bate that could determine the adequacy of general manager after a six-month leadership
Southern California's water supply for der vacuum.Ronald R.Gastelum,a former MWD
ades to come.Its ability to handle a welter of attorney and executive of a waste manage-
intertwined issues will determine whether the ment firm,soon will be under pressure to give
region will have the water it needs to sustain final approval to the big San Diego-Imperial
population and economic growth. water trade,help negotiate a state water bond
Metropolitan will succeed only if it aban- issue for the March 2000 ballot and work on a
dons its mossback approach and asserts new California plan to stop exceeding the state's
leadership in cooperation with the broader allocation of Colorado River water. The San
water community. No matter how big the Dlego-Imperial trade is the key to fashioning
MWD may be, its we-know-beat approach no California's allocation plan And if there is no
longer works. trade, Peace says he will block the water far
The very structure of the district might be cilities bond issue.
at risk as lawmakers consider proposals to Gastelum's challenge is to pursue a strong,
overhaul the agency's unwieldy hierarchy. consistent policy that will restore the
One legislative plan would junk the MWD's agency's public credibility and effectiveness.
existing 51-member board and replace it with That is possible only if board members do
an elected board of five to nine members. what they are supposed to do—set broad
Ewen the MWD's few friends in the Legis- policy—and let Gastelum manage the agency.
lature have found it hard to defend the
agency against charges of political manipula-
tion, mismanagement and a campaign to
undermine a critical deal to shift water from
the farms of the Imperial Valley to San Diego.
A low point came last month when a hostile
Senate committee studying Metropolitan's af-
fairs called on officials to account for a re-
ported cost overrun of up to $500 million on
construction of a new reservoir in Riverside
County. When they acknowledged that mis-
takes were made but insisted there was no
wrongdoing, Sen. Steve Peace (D-San Diego)
VtctllyC % 1UU11LY .7d111Ld Ll Vll LJIJLIIGLS _
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page# Date Subject
Orange County Register
Mexican raw sewage
flowing across border
Nearly 12 million gallons of
raw sewage flowed from Mexi-
co across the border into the
American side of the Tijuana
River,San Diego County offi-
cials said.
The spill began at about 12:30
p.m. Friday when a sewage di-
version system in Mexico be-
came blocked; crews didn't
plan to make repairs until Mon-
day afternoon,according to a
statement from county environ-
mental health officials.
Sewage contamination from
Mexico has been a problem in
the region for decades. In Jan-
uary,a broken pipeline allowed
about 5 million gallons of sew-
age to pour into the Tijuana
River Valley.
orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject I
��w 3 y� most ia�fluential
Z.
kid
I JOHN COLLINS. JIM 57W4 SS,Huntington DAVE SHIRLEY
y 16Beach
SS, Fountain Valley SULLIVAN,62, DEIrLOFF,
Hun
.,.Mayor of ill Humin on 63,
...Fountain Valley... be 2nvi District countymy
Beach...Citycouncilman Huntington Beach...
Began the Pioneer p and retired orthodontist Cry councilwoman for
supervisor into the nett
Business Corp.in 7980... ...Finishing up his last five years...Misses
Spends il lot of time nmg amillen secoiumnd
after win- term on the council... being mayor....As
ring a second term in
with Chil that t USA,s 799E...First priority is to Came into government
and em coastal commissioner,
program that teaches w n' outsider and expects development
pay down the countys
chikken to resist abuse bankruptcy-related won't consider himself a plans for the Bolsa rChka
e
s President of the Helped
se elated debt success unless he leaves mesa to come before
Southwest Community m Helped secure a An as an outsider':.Lost' - her in the coming
Center in Santa Ana, million fora Santa Ana 7998 challenge to lnd months...25 years since
which provides shelter flood control Channelthat removes Silva.Supervisor n-- she wme before the
and aid to the homeless Silva ...Has longrun- commission to protest
...Serves on 12 boards Huntington from a flood ring feud with police destruction of the wet-
of directors in the com- plane...Supported a 7- union...Former presl- lands... Looks forward
ry 800 help line for seniors
muni Got his scan in dent of morrow i,. 7 to renovation of down-
...Plans to make build-
politics by campaigning Beach Tomorrows Co- town and Huntington
for Price.ClubThick
(now ingmore
code enforcement authored Measure C Beach Center mall...
accentCostco)....7lm Boston more efficient.a Enjoys that approval for voter and gardening ring,bicycling
sailing,golfing and bicy- a
accent.e Comes froma eveloplfor major anhoughhhasflowers
no
clan through long line of policemen g 9 development of park although she has no
and firefighters e Huntington Monied and beach land...Wants time for any.:.Married
to Connie forr 19 years... to teach hi
Married far 37 years and His son is a fighter pilot after
school Three
Bob for 43 years...
has three children and g p biology after retiring Three grown children,
and his daughter's at the
two cats e Says m still Air Force Academy from politic_, two grandchildren for
usher the broom i g t e m... ails on o softball whom she would fall in
P lase year's ranking: 77 team...Hails from front of a moving train
around the house.., 9
Last year's ranking:S Boston...Last yasYs ._last year's ranking:
ranking:15 9
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
ut tav> v U I'(1w4
Education is key to keeping oceans safe
e take a shower,and Wstations,two treatment plants,
soap and shampoo go and ocean disposal facilities.
down the drain. Together two treatment plants
We wash our clothes process more than 250 million
and the detergent and bleach go gallons of wastewater a day.
down the drain. About 20 percent or the flow
We send our food scraps comes from industrial and
through the garbage disposal and commercial activities and the
they go down the drain. - rest is from residential
We flush,and the drain again properties.
is used to remove waste from our " Treatment Plant No.1,where
homes and businesses. the administrative headquarters
What happens to all this stun are also located,is on Ellis
that goes down the drain? John Collins Avenue,adjacent to the Santa
In the Fountain Valley/ MAYOR'S COLUMN Ana River,in Fountain Valley.
Huntington Beach area it is Treatment Plant No.2 is at
collected,treated and disposed Brookhurst Street and Pacific
not connected to the Sanitation Coast Highway in Huntington
orby the Orange County District lines. Beach.The plants use
Sanitation District. These storm sewers take street mechanical and biological
In today's society,this is a •runoff and direct it to flood
empty into the Processes to treat the wastewater
service we have come to expect channels that
and seldom think about.I would to meet strict federal and stale
ocean without any treatment. quality standards and then
like to give you brief overview That is why it is so very discharge the treated effluentof r process soo we may better important that toxic materials through a 5-mile long,30-foot
understand and a that Tale an (i.e.motor oil,antifreeze,lawn ,diameter ocean outfall pipe al a
important service that fertilizer,etc.)are not allowed to depth of200 feet.
contributes to our quality of life. go in"storm sewers." The Orange County Sanitation
When wastewater leaves the When we hear about a"beach District serves more than 2
house,it goes to sewer lines to closure,"it is generally due to million people in a 439-square-
the street and then to a larger storm drain runoR,not mile area that includes 24 of the
line until it connects with a trunk Sanitation District problems. county's 32 cities.
line that is maintained by the (Please remember this if you are If you have a group(Boy
Orange County Sanitation ever tempted to dispose of Scouts,Girl Scouts,church or
District. animal waste or auto coolant club)that would be interested in
The responsibility to install down a storm sewer.) a lour of the facility,please call
and maintain all sewer lines up The Orange County Sanitation (114)962-2411.
to the Orange County Sanitation District's system includes more
trunk line rests with the city.The than 800 miles of major sewer John Collin is mayor of Fountain
storm drains you see in the street pipelines(some as large as 90 Valley.His column appears uvory
with openings into the curb are inches in diameter).33 pumping nlaur weak in H Vhiw
News Ec le n ex �o
at / IM ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP)
(30I
why n TO Cr free?
,r 3 W�151110T q0 for ffCL'? I AlaTouc R'
6� Jl I
e nes ay, Apn _ , Is)s '
NEWPORT BEACH
By ANDREW STEVEN HARRIS, (949)574-4231
he City Council on Monday moved to protect the tide
RELATED pools that line the coast. The tide pools'fragile
ecosystem has been disrupted by frequent field trips by
O.C. SECTIONS schoolchildren,tourists and bait-hunting fishermen. Primary
NEWS BY among the safeguards is educating the public and reducing the
COMMUNITY number of visitors scheduled for daily outings to the tide pools.
The city will also look into appointing a seasonal "marine
SPORTS preserve supervisor" to coordinate the tide pool program.
PREP SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
BUSINESS
LIFE&STYLE Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
TIDE POOLS,ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY. WILDLIFE
CALENDAR MANAGEMENT.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to
retrieve one.
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
Want to know
what's r%gly
worth a thousand
words!
�4 �M4�Pr
http://www.l atimes.com/IiO MEINE W S/ORANGE/OCNE W S/t00003 8216.1.html 4/28/99
eWs G`r 1 e n eX GO
II I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
Wednesday, April 28, 199
LA H"RA
By CHRISTINE CASTRO. (714)966-7440
he city will be advertising soon for bids on 12 sewer
RELATED improvement projects. City Council members last week
approved two plans for the improvements. The plans--
O.C.SECTIONS which use different proportions of two types of pipe--are
MAIN PAGE estimated to cost$407,990 and $627,737.said City Engineer
Majdi Ataya. A decision on a contractor is expected to be made
NEWS BY by late May,Ataya said.
COMMUNITY
SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREPSPORTS
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
BUSINESS SEWERS LA HABRA(CA)--PUBLIC WORKS.You will not be
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
SO CAL LIVING
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
1 I
1 . 1 11
���
http://Www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t00003821 I.1.html 4/28/99
ews I.: co i e n ex - co
• it ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP`3
CJOIN(j TO (3OC�FI ? � � '
a_teroucx why riot groforfree? �c'
1'ue�s ay,Apnr��449
PLACENTIA
By JENNIFER ANNE PEREZ, (949)574-4211
�he Yorba Linda Water District is holding an open house
RELATED May 1 so the public can view its water care facilities.
The event will take place from 8 a.m.to noon at the
O.C.SECTIONS Richfield Plant in Placentia, where six of the district's eight
NEWS BY water wells are located. Organizers will demonstrate the plant's
COMMUNITY technology, including the use of water pipelines, a new sewer
cleaning machine and techniques used to create drought-
SPORTS tolerant landscaping.
PREP SPORTS Refreshments and take-home materials will be provided.
The Yorba Linda Water District provides water for
BUSINESS Placentia,Anaheim,Brea and unincorporated areas of Orange
County. The plant is at 913 S. Richfield Road. Information:
LIFE&STYLE (714) 777-3018.
CALENDAR
Copyrigh[ 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will
HOME DESIGN not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking for a
new or used
http:/Iwww.latimes.corn/HOME/NEWS/ORANGEIO CNE W S/t000037796.l.html 4/27199
......... .-..........�.o.....o w ..u.....� . ....u....... u..u.w rage r
eus i4 GC l e m eX i;� GO
I I A SECTION HELP?
Less time shopping. IIN Ip1111
Moretime mnn��li{r'I�r CIIQheremshopll
playing! IIIIIIx 110111xl J
Ihursday, ay�M y 13, 1499
Storm Drain Diversions to Cut Bay Pollution Planned
.Beaches: Tainted water will be routed through sewage treatment plants
before being released in ocean.
By JOSH MEYER Times Staff Writer
os Angeles County is launching a project to help
eradicate one of Southern California's most intractable
problems--the polluted storm drain runoff that sickens
swimmers in Santa Monica Bay and closes beaches during the
ADVERTISEMENT crowded summer months.
The county Department of Public Works will begin building
its first storm drain diversion system near King Harbor in
Redondo Beach as early as next month,officials said
News Wednesday.
It is also planning to begin building at least three more
1 @StIg10U5 diversion systems at bacteria hot spots around the bay later this
year. The county picked the storm drains that it says have the
most pollution and spill into beaches with the highest
concentrations of swimmers who could get sick from high
bacteria counts. Tens of thousands of beach-goers visit these
y/—Sq beaches each summer weekend.
The projects will be completed between 2000 and 2002.
The city of Los Angeles is about to start testing a storm
drain diversion system of its own in Venice, with at least one
more project on the way in another high-density area. In all,
there are fewer than 70 storm drains emptying into the 50 miles
of coastline along Santa Monica Bay,many of them in out of
the way areas that do not affect many swimmers.
"This is a very big step in the right direction," said Menerva
Daoud,director of the Public Works Department's
Environmental Programs Division. "You won't hear on the
news, 'Don't go to the beach, it's dangerous! Pollution!'You
won't have to worry about going into the water in the summer
months."
When built, the diversion systems aim to use simple
technology--a few connecting pipes and filters—to stop much of
the so-called urban runoff from surging through major storm
drains and being dumped onto beaches or directly into the
ocean. Instead,the runoff will be diverted into the existing
sewage treatment systems run by the county and the city so it
can be processed and stripped of its toxic substances before
being dispatched into the ocean at points much farther out to
sea.
Right now,the trash,debris,motor oil,fertilizers,pesticides
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000042915.html 5/13/99
JWIY,U�YW U1,Mi1V11i W l..W LY) 1 VIWYVL l IWLIGY 1 Y�V J
that went on over the years over where to divert the runoff.
Daoud said the county expects to award contracts for the
three remaining projects by the end of next month.If approved,
they will be built at the Ashland Avenue storm drain in Santa
Monica,and at the Pershing Drive and Brooks Avenue storm
drains in Los Angeles.
Once the Redondo Beach system is completed,Daoud said,
the runoff from parts of Redondo Beach,Hermosa Beach and
Torrance that converge at the King Harbor drain will instead be
sent to the sanitation district's treatment plant in Carson.
Meanwhile,the city of Los Angeles has completed
construction of its first diversion project at the Thornton
Avenue storm drain and is putting it through tests before
starting it up sometime in July,said Gary Moore, storm water
program manager for the city's Bureau of Sanitation.
The city also is planning to divert the runoff from a drain
near the Bay Club just north of Santa Monica,Moore said.
And,he said,Mayor Richard Riordan has proposed funding
four other low-flow diversion projects; two at Dockweiler State
Beach and one each at Palisades Park and Pulga Canyon,which
both are north of Santa Monica.
Like county officials,Moore expects the diversion efforts
will have an immediate impact on quality of water at beaches
in Santa Monica Bay.
And that excites lifeguards like Randy DeGregori,who has
worked in the waters of Santa Monica Bay since the 1970s.
Now chief lifeguard for Los Angeles County,DeGregori
remembers when the water was so polluted "you couldn't even
see the sand"from.several feet away. In recent years,he said,
the runoff would stink,and be filled with debris and trash,so
much so that lifeguards frequently post signs saying,"Warning:
Storm Drain Runoff.May Cause Illness" along the sand.
"I think its going to improve the water quality when and
where it counts,when the masses of people come down here,"
DeGregori said. "I use the water every day,and I appreciate the
clean water."
rra
Bay Cleanup Effort
The county and city of Los Angeles are embarking on a
series of storm drain diversion projects to prevent polluted
runoff from entering-Santa Monica Bay. Here are the areas
where the runoff from the storm drains usually empties into the
bay.
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angela Times for similar stories about:
POLLUTION CONTROL.SANTA MONICA BAY.SEWERS OCEAN
POLLUTION—SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA LOS ANGELES L�
—PUBLIC WORKS GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS.You will na be
charged t 01—ooF�ories,only to retrieve one.
Nam ^— so index
httpJ/www.latimes.com/HomumWS/ASECnON/tWO42915ldml 5/13/99
.u...�.ru�s.....v m a-abe a U.,
� community news oe "age _ m
�F,Y oCRgisteircoO THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ' HELP [ SEARCH
REFRESHING THE WETLANDS HOMEPAGE
TOUAY'S NEWS
BOLSA CHICA: Idea for an ocean inlet will soon AUTOMOTIVE
move to the public arena. BUS
FINANCE
COLUMNS
May 11, 1999 COMMUNITY NEWS
Y •Today'a Slopes
•Beat es
•Corerevniy Events
By PAT BRENNAN
•Crime&Courts
The Orange County Register Ed. Dan
•Flrewain
BOLSA CHICA .iega Line
WETLANDS— •Legal Notices
•Obituanes
Schoolchildren come by the •OC Teens
busload,clomping p g across a •Poliba&Govemmenl
FIELD TRIP: Youngstudents -Register In EduWoon
wooden bridge to see nature watch for birds recetly during a •Sneaai Features
at its finest: noisy flocks of science program at the Boise CRIME&COURTS
birds in endless shapes and Chica Ecological Reserve. EDUCATION
colors, wide-open vistas of owz rCHcS METIVIERI Ti3Onnee EMPLOYMENT
Cue ENTERTAINMENT&
channels lined with TRAVEL
pickleweed, salt flats _ _ FUN&GAMES
dissolvinginto heat T - - • •-.._ HEALTH&FITNESS
LIBERTY ONLINE
m Shimers on the horizon. - _ > LIVING&SHOPPING
-�
5 - POLITICS&
GOVERNNT
Wetlands biologist Jack . ,,�� _ REAL ESTATE
Fancher says he can do SCIENCE&
TECHNOLOGY
better. SERVICES&
PROMOTIONS
SPORTS&RECREATION
"This is what people think is CUTTING IN: Federal and state WEATHER
Bolsa," Faucher said on a officials are working on a proposal
recent morning as he stood to cut a 350-foot-wide channel
on the footbridge leading beneath Pacific Coast Highway
B g that would allow sea water to flood
into the Bolsa Chica 400 acres of the Bolsa Chica
Ecological Reserve. "But wetlands.
from our perspective, it's the Public comment on the proposed
1,000 acres on the other side inlet at the Bolsa Chica wetlands
of the fence." won't be sought until September,
when an environmental impact
report and an environmental
Those back acres—a impact statement will be released
tideless expanse of for review.
bedraggled plants and dusty
roads marked with nodding Once the documents are made
oil wells—are what available, the public will have 45
Panther hopes to convert days to respond. At that time. The
Pe Orange County Register will
into a pre-20th-century publish phone numbers or
paradise for light-footed addresses of government
clapper rails,tems,marine agencies where you can lodge
fish, clams,crustaceans and Your opinion.
other salt marsh inhabitants.
http://www.ocmgister.com/searcIV1999051 I/community/bolsa0l l w.shtml 5/12/99
shape of their beloved waves,among cities obsessed with
boundaries and property lines,and among politicians and
experts with their own lengthy agendas.
"We don't want an inlet," said Bill Gregory of the Huntington
and Long Beach chapter of the Surfrider Foundation. "Our
perspective is, don't mess with Mother Nature."
MANY CHANGES TO AREA
But Mother Nature has seen a great deal of human intervention
at Bolsa Chica already—so much that it bears little
resemblance to its pre-settlement past.
The Ecological Reserve—the portion of the wetlands visible
from the highway—is a lot like a fancy storefront that hides a
shabby,low-profile building. The damaged acreage behind it is
barely visible to visitors.
The reserve portion was restored in 1978,and has what
wetlands insiders call a"muted tidal influence." Ocean water
does wash in,taking a roundabout route through Huntington
Harbour. But the water level changes at most by 18 inches
each day, not several feet as it would if the tide came in full
strength.
And it takes so long for water to circulate that the water
molecules in the reserve are rather elderly by scientific
standards: They remain in the wetlands for weeks,making
them subject to extreme variation in oxygen and salinity that
few aquatic organisms can handle.
Nevertheless,the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve represents
one of the most successful wetlands restorations in coastal
Southern California history,Faucher says. It supports an
amazing variety of wetlands plants and birds.And given the
engineering and political limitations in 1978, it was probably
as close to a true tidal wetland as its builders could make it
LESSENING IMPACT OF TIDES
One early concern of engineers was that the inlet would disrupt
the thriving habitat in the reserve. Ocean tides at full strength
would destroy the muted tidal habitat, and endangered least
terns,Belding's savannah sparrows and other birds could lose
suitable breeding sites.
So the reserve will be protected by an earthen berm. The full
strength of the tide will be limited to a 400-acre portion of the
damaged wetlands behind the reserve,possibly expanding to
an additional 250 acres in the years ahead.
And that vision is what Faucher considers to be the true Bolsa
Chica.
httpi/www.ocregister.com/searrh/1999051 I/commumty/bo l sa011 w.shtml 5/12199
u r.. w ......•. ,•......yub �,•..w• u•.•bJ • wb•wu • e�,c ,
EWS � GO 12 fl e% � GO
• �� 47 METRO HELP'J
'_� visa
I mrs ay, May 13, I
DWP to Unveil Sweeping Clean Energy Program
■Utilities: Incentives would lure customers to pay slightly higher rates
for'greener' power sources. Some question plan's feasibility.
ByJIMNEWTON, Times Siaff rVriter
David Freeman, the Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power's folksy, restless general manager who has
attacked his agency's massive debt and pushed through
the first layoffs in modem city history,now plans to make a
ADVERTISEMENT revolution.
If it succeeds,the nation's largest municipal utility will shift
from dirty,dangerous sources of energy such as coal,and
instead focus on a clean,decentralized future built on
windmills and solar panels.
In essence,the program boils down to this: Customers who
want to pay for alternative energy sources can sign up for the
program and will probably receive about a 6%rate increase, an
buy and sell' average of about S3 a month. In return,they will get price
wheel d d• . breaks and rebates on energy saving devices, which Freeman
says will cut their power usage and end up giving them lower
LAN electric bills overall. In return, the DWP gets money to reduce
• its dependence on faraway,debt-encumbered coal-powered
plants, and the city gets cleaner energy.
Not everyone is sure Freeman's idea will work. Some
question whether customers will pay more for power, even if
the increase is modest and for a good cause. Others worry
about Freeman's approach, suggesting that his enthusiasm for
environmental causes is outpacing his business sense.
Still, the program has big backers too. At its unveiling
today, Freeman will be joined by a representative of the
Clinton administration,as well as a pair of usually reliable
opponents, Mayor Richard Riordan and Councilwoman Ruth
Galanter.
Clinton had planned to attend the event before the war in the
Balkans required his presence in Washington. Instead,
Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson will be on hand to applaud
the program.
Other programs have made similar bids for environmental
support, but the DWP's differs in two important ways. Rather
than using the money to sign up existing suppliers of clean
power, it will spend it developing new sources; and despite an
increase in utility rates, it comes with subsidies on appliances,
freebies such as long-lasting lightbulbs and other programs that
Freeman says will allow customers to break even on their bills
http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/METRO/t000042979.html 5/13/99
ews - co ie n ex
II T I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELPV
How Pd!ICij
Do You Want
to L-.jy= Today?
Wednesday, Iv a) 12,11999
ANAHEIM
By CRYSTAL CARREON, (714) 966-7835
s part of Water Awareness Month, the Anaheim Angels
will honor participants in the ninth annual Anaheim
RELATED Public Utilities water conservation poster contest during
O.C.SECTIONS a pregame ceremony at Edison Field on May 27. Elementary
MAIN PAGE school students will illustrate the importance of using water
responsibly,contest officials say. The winning posters are on
NEWS BY display in the lobby of City Hall West, 201 S. Anaheim Blvd.
COMMUNITY Information: (714)765.4250.
SPORTS Copyrigh 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREP SPORTS
BUSINESS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
SO CAL LIVING
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
http://www.latimes.com/HONIENEWS/ORANGE/t000042670.1.htral 5/12/99
community news one age Elm
.ei.ste- me GAAtIIMECOUMY BEGISM I NW I SEMOI
Activist businesswoman is a clear HOMEPAGE
TOYS NEWS
victor ARCCHHIVES
AUTOMOTIVE
BUSINESS 8 FINANCE
ENVIRONMENT, The crusader against storm- CLASSIFIED
drain pollution makes her mark on the auto-shop COLUMNS
COMMUNITY NEWS
cleanup industry. Z. ."Rones
:Community Events
•Crime&Courts
April 22, 1999 •Eauuuon
•EI Toro
•FirewalCh
By PAT BRENNAN ;Gl;"u•oea The Orange County Register duades
•OC Teens
•Polldea&Go"Inmem
The future looked grim only a few months ago for •Rapider In Educalla,
environmental activist Kendra Tillery. noel alas Fealures
CRIME&COURTS
Her business—steam cleaning the floors of auto service shops EDUCATIONEMPLOYMENT
—seemed headed for bankruptcy,her campaign to change her ENTERTAINMENT&
industry's practices seemed to be foundering,and a bank was TRAVEL
AMES
threatening to repossess her pressure-washing equipment. HEALTH&FITNESS
LBERTY ONLINE
LIVING&SHOPPING
But those who might have written her off didn't count on her POLITICS&
tenacity.The 23-year-old,who spends s with her GOVERNMENT
p s evenings REAL ESTATE
fiance surreptitiously videotaping competitors as they dump SCIENCE&
toxic wastewater into storm drains, is back on top of her game. TECHNOLOGY
SERVICES&
PROMOTIONS
Tillery and her fiance, Aron Gould, have single-handedly SPORTS&RECREATION
exposed a serious source of ocean pollution that had gone WEATHER
almost unnoticed by environmental regulators—the oil,
grease and other gunk sprayed off auto shop floors, and into
storm drains,by private contractors.
Their videotapes will be used as evidence against one
competitor, lose Guzman of Fullerton,who has been charged
by the Orange County District Attorney's Office with violating
pollution laws.
The district attorney's environmental-crimes unit also is
investigating auto dealerships that employed Guzman,whom
prosecutors allege offered cut-rate service because he didn't
bother using expensive waste-disposal equipment;he and his
employees simply washed the waste water into the storm drain
system, which leads to the ocean,Tillery and prosecutors
contend.
Neither Guzman nor his attorney returned phone calls seeking
comment.
http://www.ocregister.com/community/spyO22w.shtml 4/22/99
service bays of large auto dealerships—oils,antifreezes,
• metals. When that runoff goes into the storm drains,the
accumulation of all those wastes is no different than a small oil
spill. Actually, it's a little more toxic,because you have more
variety of materials."
Tillery continues to press her cause,pushing state and federal
regulators to take action and looking forward to the effects of
her lawsuit
The recent turn of events in her favor is a welcome relief.
Now I'm thrilled," she said. "It's opened up a whole world of
possibilities.The Greenpeace slogan is'The Power of One.'I
never used to believe it.And I do now."
al newspaper in nge County,Califonnia
. 'lftegisfier. .
Copyright 19N The Orange County Register
Please send comments to o=oisterWlink.heMom.com
http://www.ocregister.com/co=unity/spy022w.shtml 4/22/99
♦WG 11, U, L, 1.. N44N N1W1.y l .66 1 W n
Horne age :S M,
iQ community news
i1 Isco91stw.ceut THE ORANGE COUNTV REGIS= ( HELP I SEARCH
New plan in El Toro water cleanup HOME PAGE
TODAYS NEWS
REUSE: A decision to reclaim water rather than AMur`o OTIVE
make it drinkable delays a desalter pact. BUSINESSAFINANCE
CLASSICOLUMNS
April23, 1999 COMMUNITY NEWS
•Ta 8 sloNes
6ea
Commun&y Evenly
By MARY ANN MILBOURN �CiimMv=
The Orange County Register :El TM
-Fi,ewalch
IRVINE—The experts say the water will be perfectly good I0Wtl1im.
—even better, in fact,than what people drink from their tap -OCC Tae e
now. •PalNm A Government
Reegglaw In Eaumaon
:=e n
But that doesn't make Woodbridge resident Ell Davis feel any Cq�IMEe11 F.W.
COURTS
better. EDUCATION
EMPLOYMENT
ENTERTAINMENT&
"You don't know down the road what they will find," said TRAVEL
Davis as she walked her Yorkshire terrier, Wendell, around FUN A GAMES
HEALTH A FITNESS
shimmering North Lake. LIBERTY ONLINE
LIVING A SHOPPING
It's that public unease that persuaded the Irvine Ranch Water GOVERRNNMENT
District board to change direction on a plan to clean up a REAL ESTATE
plume of contaminated water emanating from the El Toro SCIENCE
A
Marine base. SERVICES A
PROMOTIONS
SPORTS&RECREATION
The change raises questions about whether a long-awaited WEATHER
agreement with the Navy to build a$30 million desalter plant
to treat the contamination will go through.
"It makes the project much more complex," said William R.
Mills Jr.,general manager of the Orange County Water
District,a party to the negotiations.
According to the original plan,the contaminated water would
go through reverse osmosis,then a carbon filter to remove the
trichloroethylene and other contaminants that seeped into an
unused aquifer 300 feet below Woodbridge. Once treated, it
would be added to the Irvine Ranch district's drinking water.
That's where the problems began. Irvine Ranch hired
Discovery Research Center,an independent company,to query
people about the plan. Focus groups were set up, one with
people who had taken Irvine Ranch tours,two of uninvolved
citizens,and one of people active in water issues.
Each group reacted the same: They supported treating the
contamination but didn't feel comfortable drinking the results.
http://www.ocregisteT.corWcommunity/water023w.shtmi 4/23/99
m nyp.urw rage t w a
EWS � GO IE ❑ e% � GO
1Fj
/I / A SECTION HELP
10
/ �/ /
�I ad y,Apriff3,19t59
Bill on Testing Ocean Quality Is Approved
■House: State's congressional representatives lead campaign to 'level
playing field'between states that test and those that don't.
By RICHARD SIMON, Times Staff Writer
ASHINGTON--Chalk up a victory for the congressional
Surf Caucus.
The House unanimously approved a bill Thursday to
spur states into monitoring the ocean for disease-causing
ADVERTISEMENT pathogens and warning beach-goers when the water is
contaminated.
Which explains the odd sight on the Capitol grounds after
I the vote: a group of congressmen holding up surfboards to
celebrate the bill's passage.
"The public has a right to know what they're swimming in,"
Looking far a said the measure's chief sponsor, Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-San
Diego), an avid surfer and onetime mayor of Imperial Beach.
new or used A number of California communities, including Los
Angeles and Orange counties, already test coastal waters,and a
new California law mandates weekly testing at heavily used
public beaches between April and October.
But many other coastal states do not regularly check the
water or report their findings.
Supporters of Bilbmy's bill,which now goes to the Senate,
say it could create a more even playing field between states that
test and those that do not.
"The standards that states use to measure beach water safety
vary from state to state," Santa Monica-based Heal the Bay
wrote earlier this year in urging its members to write their
members of Congress to support the bill. "This creates a
scenario whereby states that actually monitor regularly--like
Califomia--may be unfairly represented in the public eye."
As an example,Darryl Hatheway, a board member of the
San Clemente-based Surfrider Foundation, noted that San
Diego County officials are testing, "and they get criticized
because they have beach closures. Yet other states are not
doing anything at all. They have no idea if they have poor
water quality or not."
The bill seeks to ensure that"you can go to the beach in
Gulf Shores, Ala., Santa Monica or Cape Cod and know you're
protected from getting sick when you swim," said Sarah
Chasis, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense
Council.
The Beaches Environmental Assessment, Cleanup and
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000036468.html 4/23/99
all 4LLhrL�\1L
News--- - GO IE_ EX_ _ GO
R • / ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
How 1s/ucii
Do You Want �( VIS4
to -vi Today?
Friday, nr23, 1999
SAN CLEMENTE
By CHRIS CEBALLOS (949)248-2150
Inesidents will be seeing a slight increase in their water
bills in the coming months. The City Council has
RELATED I approved a 7.5%rate increase. Along with the rate hike,
O.C.SECTIONS the council approved a plan to adjust rates at the end of each
MAIN PAGE year based on water department budgets. Information: (949)
361-8200.
NEWSBY
COMMUNITY Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times,All Rights Reserved
SPORTS
PREP SPORTS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
BUSINESS
SO CAL LIVING
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
0164 Saw, 'N!
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE✓t000036565.1.html 4/23/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register
IT'S ALL
a J"Y' T: t
ABOUT r' JAIL 00.f
WATER " 3
Eli San
of San Joaquin - i
Elementary in '. - w ^ 4C A
Laguna Hi
0 _
checks out a - s
holding tank in
the Water °
Recycler exhibit
at the -
Childreni
Drinking Water H ',`}- Si„., ,Fw� JALO OC.O t 's'fto of
Festival on
Wednesday. Mil yr a i'T '�
The festival t
Tuesday and rt T y.dtsi" . - " s,.c}• i Ada . Y'
Wednesday at
Hidden Valley Z,
Park in Irvine
was presented
by the county
Water District , " d tt •-• *.iw s .}aQ,�,pgp ,
and Disneyland
Resort.
VEJ
Orange county
Register
v.u. uuucrn Dwn m Ds! . UPwy oun ngauwL oa.r
ew5 GO le n ex _ _ 71
GO
;I ORANGE COUNTY N• EWS HELP.
How idijr;ij
Do You Want VISA
to �_wa Today?
Thursday, April 22,1-999
O.C. Suffers Blow in Bankruptcy Suit Against S&P
■ Courts: A judge rules the county must show'actual malice' rather than
mere negligence by the bond rater.
By E. SCOTT RECKARD, Times Staff Writer
fter collecting$800 million in Nord to pilot or
settlements over its 1994 financial "rt
RELATED debacle, Orange County has suffered a tM nrsel«,me
O.C.SECTIONS severe legal defeat in its final major case,
MAIN PAGE which attempts to blame the Standard & Poor's bond-rating
agency for failing to sound alarms about the investments that
NEWS BY toppled the county into the biggest municipal bankruptcy in
COMMUNITY history.
SPORTS U.S. District Judge Gary L. Taylor in Santa Ana has ruled
that S&P's work while assessing the county's ability to repay its
PREP SPORTS bondholders was covered by the 1 st Amendment. S&P gave its
highest ratings to more than$600 million in county bond debt
BUSINESS issued in 1993 and nearly$1 billion in 1994.
SO CAL LIVING Taylor's order means the county cannot recover damages if
S&P was merely negligent, only if the agency acted with
CALENDAR "actual malice" by knowingly publishing false statements or
recklessly disregarding the truth. It is the same high standard
CALENDAR the courts have established to protect news organizations
WEEKEND reporting on public figures or issues of high public interest.
HOME DESIGN "The order will have a dramatic impact on the trial of this
action," the county said in its legal papers. "It substantially
COMMENTARY raises the bar on the county's burden of proof"
T.V.TIMES Exactly how much the ruling will affect Orange County's
ability to recover damages is unclear. The county had been
seeking$3 billion in losses, bankruptcy costs and interest from
S&P, but S&P has always said it was confident of victory at
trial.
ADVERTISEMENT Taylor also narrowed the case--and the potential damages--
by ruling that the agency's work in connection with its 1993
W r , debt ratings did not meet the actual malice threshold.
NOW QM YY }
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000036239.1.htm1 4/22/99
INews GO I e index --! GO
17 of, ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELPV
Monday,April 26. 1999
ORANGE
By CRYSTAL CARREON.(7/4)9d&7833
n anticipation of receiving$5.8 million from various settlements relating to
RELATED the Orange County benkmptcy, he city included that money in a
preliminary,budget review last week.But City Manager David Ruda
O.C.SECTIONS palnte out that only 15.5%ofthe funds will go to the General Fund;the rest will
be disbursed in restricted funds,such as the Redevelopment Agency.The budget
NEWS eY IN will be approved in May.
M
SPORTS Copyrgt 19"Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREP SPORTS
BUSINESS Search the ml—B aes ofthe Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
ORANGE(CA) UDGET,ORANGE(CAI--FINANCES.You will not be charged to look
LIFE S:STYLE for stories,only to andeve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
AWERTISEMENT
• g
N
eWS Gp 1e n ex H11301
http://wtvw.lelimes.coMCT4S_DAYS/990426/t000077540.html
4/27199
ews
• al y ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP.
Monday,Apri ,
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
W aidents ere invited to on open house for the Fountain Valley-based Of..
Counry Water Distriet,9 am.to noon Saturday.The free event will feature
RELATED behind-the-scenes tours of Water Factory 21 and information on where the
D.C.SECTIONS County s water supply comes from and what the future holds for the water supply.
MAIN PAGE
Hot dogs and drinks will be served.Information:(714)378.3200.
NEWS BY Cat 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
CUM—MUNITY
SPORTS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will not be charged to
PREPSPORTS look orslo er—eta retrieve one.
BUSINESS
SO CAL LIVING
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
AINERTIEEMEW
1 Il ora
Igo
wmvcalandalNa.com
Att.
University
Alliance"
ewe Itr GO Ie InCex
http://www.latimes.corrl/HOMEINEWSIORANGE/t000037553.1.html 4/27/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section I Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times
L
Mystery Money Money from two of the accounts ORANGE COUNTY
totaling $17.5 million, eventually
was traced to the county. Its de-
Is the Root of partments and the county-run MONEY general manager of the Orange factor between cities and the
Geed control district The county County Sanitation District. county,and this isn't helping."
kept that money. Earlier this month. Mittermeler Supervisor Todd Spitzer said he
Public Quarrel But both sides are at an Impasse Continued from In sent a letter to investors declaring has advocated splitting the money
not
the remaining $12 million. ter-agencies put prossure to as. the newfound money to be the since it was first discovered.
Top county officials want it all,but p:rvisors who sit on their boards to county's. She said bankruptcy-re- So far, Durlon said,schools have
a bankruptcy agreement calls for •loch,re their position publicly. The laled funds "have long since been received refunds on about 06% of
■ Bankruptcy: Claims on
the county to share any future agencies want supervisors to give accounted for." their Investment bares; other in.
S12 million found in unclaimed money with cities and half the money to investors. County Finance Officer Gary vestora have recovered abaul 92%.
county coffers divide public agencies that invested in the Supervisors,who had turned ne. Burton admitted that the county The county has recouped less than
county's two investment pools. gotiations with investors over to "can only guess"where the money 50%of its investment losses.School
supervisors,agencies. An audit for the county by Price Executive Officer Jan Mittermeler, came free, but he believes it is districts are not part of the agree-
Waterhouse IAR accounting firm are expected to meet once again in interest earned in 1995 and 1996. ment to share unclaimed money.
ByJfAN O.PASCO failed to identify the sauce of the private session Tuesday to try to Frustrated with Mittermeiers Board Chairman Charles V.
and DAVIDBEYFS f12million. come up with a final decision. position, several agencies Schad- Smith said he supports sending the
and DAVIWREYS In recent weeks. Several urea- 'TCs time to end Ws;' Supervi. uled closed sessions of their own In matter to the bankruptcy judge and
Please see MONEY,811 sor Tom Wilson said."it has really recent weeks. Two of them, the letting the court decide where the
Deciding who gets $12 million escalated." sanitation district and the Orange moneyshouldga.
that inexplicably appeared in a It may not seem like a lot of County Transportation Authority, Supervisors Cynthia Coad and
county account has set Orange money, considering the $1.64 bil- have supervisors on their boards. Jim Silva were traveling and
County supervisors, the county's lion that was originally lost in the Wilson,who chairs the transpor- cmddn't be reached for comment.
executive officer and local govern- bankruptcy, but the county's in- tation panel,said he listened to the Irvine City Manager Paul Brady,
menl officials at loggerheads. vestment partners aid splitting arguments of pool attorneys that who chaired a committee of pool
Twice In the last 18 months, the funds Is a fight worth waging the money should be split, as well investors after the bankruptcy,
county supervisors have pandered in principle alone. as to the county's bankruptcy at- said the county simply is not living
behind closed doors what to do At issue is the county a pledge to torneys saying It shouldn't. up to its agreement Cities and
with nearly S30 million discovered split future unclaimed money "This could all turn out to be a special districts want assurances
in county accounts related to its :A-50 with cities and agencies that matter not of law but of fairness;' that any more mystery money that
historic 1994 ankruptcv. oarticipaled in two investment Wison said in a telephone inter. apliews will be split.
nnls.The pledge was a major part view this week from Washington, "In the big picture of things,
4 the settlement of claims that where he is on OCTA business. with the $800 million that oar
.Ilowcvl the county to emerde from "%Ve can go back to the bank- already got from settlements. this
!zmkruptcy in June 19%. ruptcy court an([say,'W itu.do you ammmt of money is a small pit-
"Unless it can be prom clearly want us to do with this?'Or we can lance;' Brady,said. "But our opin.
that this is money front after the have the Board of Supervisors vole ion is we sbouldn l be haggling
-onkruptcy, then it should be to split it;' he said. "The county over Something this small. We
ui4" said Dunald F. WhItyre, has been trying to rebuild the trust W!liece we're entitled to it."
L ns Angeles I uses Find Page 1 of 2
[Previous Doc] ext Doc
News ':C: co ire Intlex 'F o0
• ►� • t' I COMMENTARY HELPI/
StockGet Your
•
Tuesday,May 4, 1999
MWD Running Out of Time
he Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is in
the vortex of a debate that could determine the adequacy of
Southern California's water supply for decades to come. Its ability
to handle a welter of intertwined issues will determine whether the
ADVERTISEMENT region will have the water it needs to sustain population and
economic growth.
I go Metropolitan will succeed only if it abandons its mossback
O1Li- approach and asserts new leadership in cooperation with the
`d<oa�roo"�' broader water community. No matter how big the MWD may be,
its we-know-best approach no longer works.
The very structure of the district might be at risk as lawmakers
consider proposals to overhaul the agency's unwieldy hierarchy.
One legislative plan would junk the MWD's existing 51-member
board and replace it with an elected board of five to nine members.
Even the MWD's few friends in the Legislature have found it hard
to defend the agency against charges of political manipulation,
mismanagement and a campaign to undermine a critical deal to shift
water from the farms of the Imperial Valley to San Diego.
A low point came last month when a hostile Senate committee
studying Metropolitan's affairs called on officials to account for a
reported cost overrun of up to $500 million on construction of a
new reservoir in Riverside County. When they acknowledged that
mistakes were made but insisted there was no wrongdoing, Sen.
Steve Peace (D-San Diego) retorted with a barnyard expletive.
The good news is that the MWD has a new general manager after a
six-month leadership vacuum. Ronald R. Gastelum, a former MWD
attorney and executive of a waste management firm, soon will be
under pressure to give final approval to the big San Diego-Imperial
water trade, help negotiate a state water bond issue for the March
2000 ballot and work on a California plan to stop exceeding the
state's allocation of Colorado River water. The San Diego-Imperial
trade is the key to fashioning California's allocation plan. And if
there is no trade, Peace says he will block the water facilities bond
issue.
Gastelum's challenge is to pursue a strong, consistent policy that
.../searchcgi?action=View&DocOffset=49&DocsFound=263&QueryZip=water&Collection=Hunte 5/5/99
Los Angeles Times Find Page 2 of 2
will restore the agency's public credibility and effectiveness. That is
possible only if board members do what they are supposed to do--
set broad policy--and let Gastelum manage the agency.
Cowriebt 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
search the archives of the Los Angela Times for similar stories.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
News Mr
co ne Index eo
[Previous Docl rNext Doc
.../searchcgi?action=view&Docoffset--49&DocsFound=263&QueryZip=vater&Collectiotr—Hunte 5/5/99
A Flood of Outrage Page I of 5 ,
News - c;o Site Index.. �o
• h � � STATE & LOCAL HELP
Sunday, May 16, 1999
SPECIAL REPORT * A 200% hike in rates that a water
agency charges cities, plus alleged wastefulness and
questionable political doings, spur . . .
A Flood of Outrage
By DOUGLAS P.SHUIT, Times Staff Writer
ed up with steep water charges and millions spent on
seeming frills, cities in southern Los Angeles County are
battling the rich Water Replenishment District of Southern
California, demanding state action and threatening a massive
ADVERTISEMENT lawsuit against what they say are possible illegal business practices
and violations of political campaign laws.
�T�T� Among the litany of complaints is a 200% increase since 1991
iJ Niversity in water rates assessed against some of the county's poorest cities,
Alliance' and spending that contracting cities believe is freewheeling and
o unnecessary.
Complaints range from a $10,000-a-month consulting contract
given to Mervyn Dymally, a former lieutenant governor and
congressman who critics say helped politicize county water boards,
to the awarding of a $22-million project to a Pasadena engineering
firm without competitive bidding.
Questionable political activities by elected members of the water
district's board of directors, including purportedly nonpolitical
mailings during election seasons, the production of individualized
videos and lavish breakfasts thrown free for voters, all at public
expense, have led the city of Downey to request an investigation by
the state Fair Political Practices Commission.
On a broader front, Downey city officials have been joined by a
growing number of angry officeholders in other cities, including
Lakewood, Santa Fe Springs and Pico Rivera. A lawsuit may be
filed against the water district to stop what cities believe may be the
improper expenditure of public money.
"The district's staffing has grown to the extreme," said Downey
Councilwoman Joyce Lawrence, contending that the water district
over-assessed cities and water agencies to build up a $70-million
cash surplus, then went on a spending spree. "They are adding
tasks and capital improvements beyond anything anybody thinks
they should be doing."
http://v w .latimes.com/excite/990516/t000044030.htrW 5/17/99
A I'lood of Outrage Page 2 of 5
The cities have enlisted the support of state Sen.Martha Escutia
(D-Whittier), who is asking the states Joint Legislative Audit
Conunittee to authorize a state examination of the water district's
books.
Among the most troubling expenditures cited by the cities are
handwritten bills from Dymally to the water district seeking
payment for consulting services at a rate of$10,000 a month in
August, September, October and December 1996. In one instance,
records obtained by The Times show that a bill from Dymally dated
Sept. 1 was paid in full Aug. 27, three days before it indicates that
it was submitted.
Critics of the replenishment district also question$32,000 in
consulting fees paid during the last four months of 1996 to then-
South Gate City Councilman Albert Robles, who is now city
treasurer. Robles' sister M. Susan Carrillo was on the five-member
replenishment district board at the time the contract was awarded,
but abstained from voting, according to the recollections of two
principals. Carrillo did not respond to requests for an interview.
Also being cited is the$22-million contract awarded without
bidding to Montgomery Watson Americas, a Pasadena engineering
company, to build two plants to desalinate and recycle seawater
that has seeped into the aquifer. Downey Public Works Director
Desi Alvarez said the contract violates the water district's
administrative rules.
Water Replenishment District President Bob Goldsworthy, a
chemical engineer elected to the board in 1988, said the agency's
budget and all its expenditures have been entirely appropriate,
designed either to fulfill its mission or educate the public.
"We certainly don'tthink an audit is necessary," he said.
Defending the contract with Montgomery Watson, he said
competitive bids were not required. He said the company was
internationally respected and performed most of the major studies
of the saltwater contamination problem in aquifers in southern L.A.
County.
As for hiring Dymally and Robles, Goldsworthy said that when
their consulting contracts were awarded in 1996, the water district
was fighting off suggestions coming from the Legislature that the
replenishment agency and two smaller water districts be folded into
one large water agency.
"We were in a state of siege at that point, trying to make people
understand what we were all about," Goldsworthy said.
"It wasn't any kind of sweetheart deal," said Dymally, calling his
contract routine. "I consulted them on ways to defuse the
controversy surrounding legislation to eliminate the district."
Explaining what the district is all about remains at the crux of
the agency's problem.Put simply,the district's critics say no
explanation is necessary.
Unlike the more familiar Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power and the Metropolitan Water District, which are responsible
for keeping the water running into Southland homes and
http://www.latimes.corn/excite/99o5l6/t000044030.html 5/17/99
A rt000 of Uutrage Page 3 of 5 ,
businesses, the replenishment district does not directly provide -
water to consumers.
Created by the state in 1959, it is supposed to replenish
underground wells that were drying up because of overpumping
and stop the intrusion of seawater, which was contaminating the
counry's underground reservoirs.
The district's mission is to charge a special assessment for each
acre-foot of water taken out of the ground by each municipal and
private water department operating in the 43 cities within its
jurisdiction. An acre-foot is 326,000 gallons,which water officials
say is enough to supply two average households for a year.
The money collected from water agencies is supposed to be
used to buy water to refill the aquifers or storage reservoirs.
For years, the replenishment district operated with a skeletal
staff,just two or three people, plus the five commissioners.
But in the early 1990s, politicians in southern Los Angeles
County realized that running for a replenishment district seat, or a
seat on two smaller water districts in the area, could provide added
name recognition and draw votes for people also seeking other
offices. The seats could also be a great source of campaign
contributions.
In addition, the positions--virtual giveaways during the 1960s
and 1970s--were seen as launching pads for higher office or landing
places for officeholders who had lost other posts and wanted to
keep their names before the public.
Dymally said races for the water district seats offered a chance
to get newcomers into elective office.
"What we did was encourage Latinos and women and minorities
to get into the whole question of governance of water," he said.
Mark Dymally, Mervyn's son, was elected to the West Coast
Basin Water District, and the senior Dymally's longtime political
lieutenant,Kenneth Orduna, was elected to the replenishment
district board.
The Dymallys were allied with South Gate's Robles, an elected
member of the Central Basin Water District, and Robles' sister,
Carrillo,who won a seat on the replenishment district board.
Another member of that board is Albert Robles,but he is not
related. To avoid confusion, South Gate's Robles is often referred
to as "Big Al."
The younger Dymally and Orduna were both defeated last year,
the latter by Willard Murray Jr., a former state assemblyman.
Critics say that as the districts became politicized, board
members raised assessments on cities to fund an expanding fist of
projects.
From a replenishment charge of$51 an acre-foot in fiscal 1990,
the year Orduna was elected, the fees grew to $162 an acre-foot in
1996,before dropping to $151 in 1999.
The outcry by the cities forced the replenishment district to
reduce its assessment to $139, beginning this July, but the cities say
a more realistic figure would be$105. The district will also reduce
http://www.latimes.com/excite/990516/t000044030.htn l 5/17/99
A hood of Outrage Page 4 of 5
its $70-million cash surplus to about $50 million by distributing
surplus funds to cities through grants. But that does not satisfy
critics either.
"It is our belief that the [replenishment district] has abused its
statutory authority to set assessments and has inappropriately spent
public funds," said Pico Rivera Mayor Carlos A. Garcia in a letter
to Escutia, asking for a state audit because of what he called "an
alarming" rise in assessments.
Downey's complaint to the political practices commission said
election-season breakfasts for directors included $50,000 spent on
a lavish spread for Orduna, who was then defeated. The breakfast,
free to voters, included giveaways like coffee mugs engraved with
Orduna's name. The event came at a time the political practices
commission was garnishing Orduna's water district compensation
to pay a fine levied against him for money laundering and filing
false reports in an L.A. City Council campaign in 1987.
Downey also protests that water education videos were
produced individually for Orduna and Carrillo, at costs of$24,000
and $19,000, respectively, to help their reelection bids.
The political practices agency refused to comment on Downey's
complaint.
Orduna said the breakfasts were part of a public outreach
campaign.
"Everything we did went by our legal counsel. He would not let
anything happen unless it was entirely legal," he said.
It could be months before questions raised by the cities are
resolved. If the audit is approved, it is uncertain how long it would
take. As for the lawsuit, attorneys say one objective would be to
stop work on the$22-million recycling plants.
RRR
High Water Costs
Cities in southern Los Angeles County are protesting the rapid
increase since 1991 in assessment fees charged by the Water
Replenishment District of Southern California.
1976: $21
2000: $139
Note: An acre-foot is enough to supply two average households
for a year.
Source: Water Replenishment District of Southern California
o
+Covrieht 1999 Los Angela Times.All Rights Reserved
6 Search the arcltives of the Las Angela Times for similar stories about:
WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALffORMA
WATER—LOS ANGELES COl1NTY,UTBM RATES,C TMS,NUSUSE
OF PUBLIC FUNDS r'AOyERNMENT MISCONDUCT.You will not be
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
http://www.latimes.con/excitet990516/t000044030.html 5/17/99
LOS. ngeles limes rind Page I oft
J Previous Dool 24ext Doc
News co Site Index - Ko
!� • HEALTH HELP)
NIUniversity . BA A
Alliance- . I1 • CIS
Friday,May 14, 1999
D.A. Seeks More Aides to Protect Water
• Health: Rackauckus urges supervisors to help implement a federal law
to clean up underground storage tanks.
By RIMARD MAROSI, Times Staff rVriter
13Ist. Arty. Tony Rackauckus on Thursday asked county
,supervisors to support a major crackdown on operators of
faulty underground storage tanks that pose a long-term risk to
Orange County's ground-water supply.
ADVERTISEMENT County officials stressed that the tanks--many of them leaking
chemicals into the ground don't present immediate threat t the
public. But they said the pollution could eventually seep into the
aquifers that supply Orange County with half its drinking water.
"Some ground water has been contaminated, but most of the
Calendar Live's aquifers are much deeper--and are usually protected by a layer of
Guest Guide clay," said Denise Fennessy, a program manager with the county
to Weddings Health Care Agency.
-yc - But she added that the clay protection is not impermeable to
contaminants--meaning they could leak through.
dick . Under Rackauckus' proposal, his environmental-crimes unit staff
here would be increased from two to four prosecutors. The number of
investigators would increase by two. The upgrades would cost
$546,000, and the Board of Supervisors is scheduled to take up the
request next week.
The additional staff would focus on enforcing a federal law
requiring the upgrading of underground tanks and the installation
of monitoring systems to detect leaks. The law was enacted in
December in response to concerns that many older, single-walled
tanks seep contaminants into the ground water.
With the extra staffing, officials expect to step up prosecutions of
tank owners who disobey the law.
Countywide, more than 2,600 tanks are buried at more than 900
facilities, including gasoline stations, chemical and aerospace
companies and trucking firms. The tanks store gasoline, waste oils,
other petroleum products and chemicals.
About 60 facilities have been cited for failing to comply with the
new law, according to a report by the Health Care Agency.
.../searchcgi?action=View&DocOffset=21&DocsFound=220&QueryZipwater+%3COR%3E+^/0 5/14/99
Los Angeles Lmes kind Page 2 of 2
Many of the citations were for lack of monitoring systems or of
reinforced piping, officials said. The fines for noncompliance vary,
depending on the severity of the violation.
Few citations for tank violations were issued, officials said, because
most tanks in the county are already double-walled.
Some environmental groups have expressed special concern over
tanks that leak a mixture of gasoline and the chemical MTBE into
wells and ground water. Oil companies used MTBE as a gasoline
additive to reduce carbon monoxide levels. But the additive has
also been linked to serious health problems, including cancer.
CaovrieM 1999 Los Angela Times.All Rights Reserved
I Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about.'
WATER—ORANGE COUNTY,WATER POLLUTION.TANKS
(STORAGE).ANTHONY RACKAUCKUS.You will not be charged to look
for stories,only to retrieve one.
ews � o Sita ndex _.
rPrevious Docl ext D
.../searchcgi?action=View&DocOffset=2l&DocsFound=220&QueryZipwater+%3 COR%3 E+%5114/99
Los Angeles i rmes i•mo Page I of 2
ext Doc
News co Site Index - co
II I STATE & LOCAL HELP"}
The
University . BAA
Alliance^ � , I I • CIS
Friday, May 14, 1999
Davis Offers Plan for $1 Billion of Surplus
.Budget: Topping list are public works and a prison built without bond
issue. Such spending would be highest since Pat Brown era.
By DANMOP4 Times Staff Writer
ACRAMENTO--With California awash in tax money, Gov.
Gray Davis wants to spend $1 billion of the expected surplus
on a new prison, parks and road projects, new rail cars and other
public works, aides said Thursday.
ADVERTISEMENT Such expenditures would be the largest cash outlay for public
building and rebuilding since at least the Gov. Edmund G. "Pat"
Brown Sr. administration in the 1960s, the officials said.
N•w s The proposal is a sharp jump from the$195 million Davis offered
for such projects when he released his proposed $78-billion budget
in January. And it represents the first time in decades that
California would build a prison without using bonds to finance its
construction.
A Today, Davis will release his revised budget for the 1999-2000
PEPPERDINE fiscal year, detailing how he intends to divvy up the rest of a
MBA surplus estimated at$4 billion. Earlier this week, officials said the
governor plans to give at least $600 million more to public schools.
That still leaves him with at least $2.5 billion to spend.
Some of that is expected to go to state workers in the form of pay
raises; other money probably will be banked in the state emergency
reserve. Many lawmakers are advocating a tax cut and more aid for
local government.
Davis' decision to use general fund money for construction projects
follows recommendations by the legislative analyst's office and
others that California rely less on bonds and other long-term debt.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, California financed most of its
construction with bonds. The state cost to repay the principal and
interest on that debt will climb to $2.7 billion next year.
"I absolutely think it makes sense, to the extent we can, to pay for
streets, highways and repairing potholes on a pay as you go basis
rather than with bonds," said Senate Republican Leader Ross
Johnson of Irvine. "You get a lot more bang for the buck."
Davis wants to spend $335 million of the surplus to build a 4,500-
.../searchcgi?action=View&DocOffset=l&DocsFound=7&QueryZip=sewer+%3COR%3E+a/o2ga 5/14/99
Los Angeles Times Find Page 2 of 2
innate maximum security prison in Delano, and $20 million to plan
construction of a new prison in San Diego County. By paying for
the construction costs up front, the state will save$200 million or
more in interest costs over the next 20 years.
State corrections officials and the legislative analyses office
estimate that the state will need as many as six new facilities by
2004 to accommodate the growing prison population. A Davis
aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the governor may
propose using bonds to finance the construction of other prisons.
Also in the proposed public works package:
•Davis is calling for a$425-million infusion into the so-called
Infrastructure Bank. The bank, started by former Gov.Pete
Wilson, currently has$50 million. Loral governments can tap the
bank to finance city and county roads, sewer systems and other
projects.
• The governor wants to buy$6 million worth of new ferries for
San Francisco Bay and spend$69 million for new rail cars. The
additional cars would allow two more daily trips on the San Diegan
between Los Angeles and San Diego, and more rail trips on lines
between Bakersfield and Sacramento, Stockton and San Jose, and
San Jose and Sacramento.
• Davis proposes$157 million to expand state parks and rebuild
their trails, restrooms and other facilities. The legislative analyst
recently estimated that the states 265 parks have$180 million
worth of maintenance and building needs.
The governor's aide did not specify which parks would get the
money.However, the administration provided a fist of some
projects: a new fire protection system at Will Rogers State Park;
two new restrooms at Malibu Creek State Park; stabilization of
Malibu Pier; trail work at Topanga State Park; and repairs at the
Antelope Valley Indian Museum.
Cornd t 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles 71mrs for similar stories about:
GRAY DAVIS.CALIFORNIA—FINANCES.CALTORNIA—BUDGET,
PRISONS—CALIFORbU PRISON CONSTRUCTION,CALIFORNIA—
PUBLIC WORKS.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to remeve
one.
News................................................................................: ®o .....rte.. n......ex............._.......BED
ext Doc
.../searchcgi?action=View&DocOffset=l&DocsFound=7&QueryZip=sewer+^/o3COR%3E+%28a 5/14/99
a -
p :
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
APRIL 28, 1999
OJ�S ANITgT�
2 U
c 9
m
o �
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
OCSO•P.O.Boa 9127•Fountain Valley,CA 9272841127 0(714)862-2411
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/28/99
Page 2 of 7
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on April 28, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTNE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
A Peer Swan,Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
Jack Mauller X Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F.Walker
X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Chades E. Sylvia Ron Bates
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin;
Patrick Miles; Mike Peterman;Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman;Gerald Jones; Ryal Wheeler,
Mike Moore; Jim Herberg; Chuck Wmsor
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Jack Fleming; Don Hughes
1
Q
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/28/99
a
Page 3 of 7
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jack Fleming, an attorney representing Diverse Technical Products, spoke to the Directors
regarding the project being awarded that evening to S.S. Mechanical Corporation for Chemical
Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job
No. J-53. The firm he was representing was a supplier for Olsson Construction, the low bidder
who requested that their bid be withdrawn due to a mathematical error. Mr. Fleming requested
the Board to reject all bids and have the project go through the bidding process again.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried to consider Agenda Item No. 15 at this time. The
Directors entered into a discussion and asked questions of staff.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications and
Addenda 1, 2, and 3, for Chemical Facility Modifications,Job No. Pl-46-2 and Chemical Flow
Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, on file at the office of the Board Secretary;
(2) Receive and file letter dated April 16, 1999,from Olsson Construction, the apparent low
bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid due to a mathematical error,
(3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to S.S.
Mechanical Corporation for Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical
Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, for an amount not to exceed $2,229,251.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
The Chair reported on June 12 there will be a half-day tour for the Directors to Chino Basin and
the surrounding region to show the magnitude of the dairy cow manure problem, The wetlands
and Prado Dam will also be on the tour.
On June 25 the District will sponsor a Legislators' Day from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. The
agenda will include watershed management, groundwater replenishment system and related
topics.
Chair Debay also reported that the District will be bringing a 'Risk Communication and Public
Outrage' expert, Peter Sandman, to Orange County on October 20. The Huntington Beach
Council Chamber has been tentatively booked for this event and the District is seeking co-
sponsors for this event.
RESOLUTION FOR WATER AWARENESS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No.
OCSD 99-04, Proclaiming May 1999 as Water Awareness Month.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that the Administration Building was undergoing seismic
retrofitting for the next six months.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 24, 1999. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/28/99
' Page 4 of 7
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/99 03/31/99
Totals $4,047.206.02 $6,549,274.28
Director Mark Leyes abstained.
CONSENT CALENDAR
9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Receive and file Summons and
Complaint, Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 806799, for breach of
contract in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements,
Contract No. 11-17.1; and 2) authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and
defend the interests of the District
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report
was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the April 28,
1999 combined meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on March 24, 1999 to be filed.
12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the April 7, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 7, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Consultant Services
Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for development of
External Event Contingency Plans and Procedures to be complete by
December 1, 1999, for an amount not to exceed$110,000.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD
99-03, Declaring Support for Biosolids Application.
Minutes for Board Meeting
D4/28/99
Page 5 of 7
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Authorize the General
Manager to enter into negotiations to purchase Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch, a
5,834-acre Class B Biosolids Land Application Site, at a cost not to exceed
$8,000,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due
diligence research of Tule Ranch/Magan Ranch for use as a Biosolids Land
Application Site In an amount not to exceed $100,000.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the
Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the April 1, 1999 meeting,
summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 1, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish a project budget of
$8,100,000 for the Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46;
and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting
Engineers to prepare a sewer corrosion report, a preliminary design report, and
construction documents for the Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 546,for an amount not to exceed $199,200.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 3 to
Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver for coordinating the
preparation of a Geotechnical Study for the Realignment Study of the Santa Ana
River Interceptor, Contract No. 2.41,for an additional amount of$222,180,
increasing the total compensation from$234,530 to an amount not to exceed
$456,710.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment
of$936,000 for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract
No. 3-38-1, for a total project budget of$11,061.000; (2)Approve Addenda
Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation; (4) Reject the low bidder, T. L. Pavlich Construction, Inc.
as being non-responsive; and (5)Authorize award of a contract for Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, to Fleming Engineering, Inc,
for an amount not to exceed$8,363,796.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary
Clarifiers and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37, providing for additional
engineering services in the amount of$863,185, for a total amount not to exceed
$2,856,185.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addendum No. 2 to
the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for design of
Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.60, and Solids
Storage Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, providing for the design of Flat
bottom storage bins and electrical improvements, and the credit for Job
No. P11-60, in the amount of$101,964, for a total amount not to exceed
$915.526; (2)Accept work to date and discontinue further work with Carollo
Engineers for Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1, Job
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/28/99
' Page 6 of 7
No. P1.60; and (3) Incorporate Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant
No. 1, Job No. Pl-60 with Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job
No. J-42.
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve temporary
staffing plan for the Engineering Department; (2)Authorize staff to negotiate
contracts with staffing fines for temporary staffing; and (3) Delegate
authority for temporary staffing contract oversight to the PDC Committee.
Director Steve Anderson abstained.
14. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the
Finance,Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the April 14, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 14, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of March 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew the District's Excess
Worker's Compensation Insurance Program for the three year period May 1,
1999 to May 1, 2002, with a rate guarantee of$0.612 per$100 of annual payroll
for each fiscal year.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Require SAWPA (Santa Ana
Regional Watershed Project Authority)to pay the District the corrected O&M
charges for 1996.97, 1997-98 and 1998-99 in accordance with the 1996
Agreement; and (2)Authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with SAWPA to
structure a payment plan for the charges it owes the District which may include:
a) crediting against the amount owed, amounts already paid by SAWPA to the
District for a currently unneeded 1/10'"of 1 mgd of additional treatment and
disposal capacity, thus reducing SAWPA's capacity to 9 mgd; b) collecting the
amount owed over time; and c) relating the payment of the amount owed to
parallel discussions with SAWPA regarding SAWPA's proposal to prepay 3 mgd
of capacity to accommodate anticipated future brine discharges from new
groundwater treatment projects.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a compensation package
for District staff to support Year 2000 contingency plan execution (during New
Year's Eve weekend 2000) comprised of: (a) $250 for all onsite standby staff;
(b) $250 for all on-call standby staff, (c)$250 for all normally scheduled support
staff; (d) Time and a half overtime for all hours worked between 6:00 p.m.
December 31, 1999 and 6:00 a.m. January 3, 2000; and (a) District supplied food
and beverage for the required weekend duration,for an estimated cost of$1,400.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/28/99
Page 7 of 7
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Financial Guaranty
Insurance Corporation (FGIC) proposal for 20 basis points annual commitment
fee for the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement for the Series "C" COPs, effective
May 1, 1999 through September 1, 2002; and (2)Authorize the Director of
Finance to execute an Amendment to the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement for
the revised annual commitment fee of 20 basis points for the Series "C" COPs,
for the period May 1, 1999 to September 1, 2002.
In. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to
enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Commercial Resources Tax
Group, Inc., to review sewer service fees and Assessor's data for a total fee not
to exceed$1 million.
Directors Don Bankhead, Jim Ferryman, Patsy Marshall, Mark Murphy, and
Christina Shea opposed.
i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Equity Adjustment Policy
dated July 1, 1999.
15. Item was considered under Public Comments.
16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file letter dated March
23, 1999 from Donna Moore requesting a reduced connection fee; and (2)assess Ms.
Moore a connection fee of$50.
17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file letter from Randy
Grisham, property owner of 15 units in the City of La Habra; (2)Authorize a time
payment plan for current connection fees of 15 units at$2,360 each for a total of
$35,400; and (3) Provide that in the event connection fees for multi-family units are
reduced in 1999-2000, the reduced rates will apply to this connection. (Estimated new
fees will total$20,520.)
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
•-filGL ,��, "
Secretary of Board of i actors of
Orange Court Sanitatioi istrict
\4adon\data1\wp.dla\agenda1Board MinNes\1999 Board Minutes\042999.doc
Claims Paid From 3/01199 to 3/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
17735 Bristol Systems, Inc. $ 35,751.24 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
17736 Converse Consultants 26,444.18 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
17737 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 104,010.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98
17738 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 63,385.52 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
17739 FileNET Corporation 28.642.84 Computer Software-Electronic Document Management System
17740 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 98,042.37 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
17741 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 65.075.01 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17742 Polydyne, Inc. 28,236.71 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
17743 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 95,994.32 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
17744 Southern California Edison 51,912.06 Power
17745 Tula RanchfMagan Farms 57,659.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17746 Woodruff,Spredlin&Smart 86.527.92 Legal Services MO 7-26.95
17747 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 194,193.90 Construction 5-41-1
17748 First Fire Systems, Inc. 72,585.72 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-26-98
17749 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 132,596.00 Construction 7-17
17750 Mike Pdich&Sons 186,656.00 Construction 6-12
17751 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 104,579.28 Construction 240
.ma 17752 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 10,850.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
y 17753 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 27.18 Long Distance Telephone Services
17754 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,607.60 Long Distance Telephone Services
17755 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 6.95 Long Distance Telephone Services
17756 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 477.31 Long Distance Telephone Services
17757 Abesco 123.80 Hardware
17758 Action Door Repair Corporation 1,014.96 Door Repairs
17759 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 4,513.79 Engine Testing J-19
17760 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1,508.50 Software Subscription
17761 Air Liquide America Corp. 1,535.37 Specialty Gasses
17782 Air Products&Chemicals 243.43 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
17763 Airborne Express 28.00 Air Freight
17764 Airgas Lyons Safety 2720 Safety Supplies
17765 Allied Supply Company 1,927.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17766 American Airlines 4,864.00 Travel Services
17767 American Chemical Society 700.00 Registration
17768 Applied Indushial Technology 709.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies
17789 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,014.00 Vacuum Truck Services
17770 Art's Disposal Service, Inc. 1,862.40 Waste Removal
17771 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
17772 Azur Environmental 2.299.96 Lab Supplies
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 3118/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17773 ABB Industrial Systems, Inc. 4.838.94 Electrical Supplies
17774 AMA9Padged-Thompson 169.00 Registration
17775 ATM AN Inc. 496.00 Lab Services
17776 ATMS Technical Training Co., Inc. 5,950.00 Training Registration
17777 Barnes&Noble Books 250.50 Publication
17778 Bauer Compressors 494.88 Safety Supplies
17779 Beach Cities Scuba Mania 350.00 Training Supplies
17780 BenchMark Publishing Company 3,760.00 Publication
17781 Bio Models Co. 222.64 Lab Supplies
17782 Biocycle 385.00 Registration
17783 BloSource Consulting 6,366.35 Consulting Servicce-Biosolids&Watershed
17784 Black&Veatch 20,305.36 Engineering Services Pi-46&P2-55
17785 Bolas Radiator Service 182.10 Truck Repairs
17786 Bureau of National Affairs 954.33 Subscription
17787 Bush&Associates, Inc. 5,126.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
17788 Buy.Com 3,524.85 Computer Supplies
17789 Cal-Pac Chemical Co, Inc. 169.61 Chemicals
�..i 17790 California Automatic Gate 280.00 Service Agreement
y17791 Califomia Relocation Services, Inc. 236.00 Moving Services
17792 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,560.00 Investment Advisor
N 17793 Calolympic Safety 218.87 Safety Supplies
17794 Carollo Engineers 11,790.01 Engineering Services•Odor Control Facility Modifn.
17795 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 2.744.00 Engineering Services Pt-83
17796 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 648.64 Once Furniture
17797 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 333.00 Professional Services-Ergonomic
17798 Compressor Components Of California 1,293.00 Pump Supplies
17799 Computers America, Inc. 1,655.81 Computer Supplies
17800 Connell GM Parts 73.98 Truck Supplies
17801 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 5,719.33 Electrical Supplies
17802 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 344.68 Plumbing Supplies
17803 Cooper Energy Services 3,648.04 Engine Supplies
17804 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1.432.00 Copier Lease
17805 Corporate Express Imaging 9,887.25 Misc. Computer Supplies
17806 Corporate Express 2,609.87 Office Supplies
17807 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 100.06 Truk Parts
17808 Council on Education in Management 295.00 Registration
17809 County of Orange 1,411.50 Permit Fees
17810 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 15,424.90 Electrical Supplies
17811 Cytec Industries 15,081.50 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18
Page 2 of 9 '
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 3/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17812 CEM Corporation 844.51 Lab Supplies
17813 CLE International 495.00 Registration
17814 CWEA Annual Conference 1,364.00 Conference Registration
17815 CWEA Y2K 30.00 Registration
17816 De Guelle&Sons Glass Co. 87.47 Safety Glass
17817 Del Mar Analytical 1,070.00 Biosolids Analysis
17818 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 14.200.37 6 Dell P6400 Computers&6 Dell 1200HS Monitors
17819 Dexon Computer, Inc. 16,080.00 2 VS4000-96 Workstations
17820 DeZurik C/O MiscolSoulhWest 941.75 Valves
17821 Diamond H Recognition 284.73 Employee Service Awards
17822 Robert F.Driver Associates 3,128.00 Faithful Performance Insurance MO 6-10-92
17823 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 161.63 Paint Supplies
17824 DGA Consultants, Inc. 5,112.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
17825 DISCAN Corporation 3.535.05 Computer Services
17826 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 121.00 Medical Screening
17827 Edward R. Eissnhauser 500.00 Professional Service-Financial
17828 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 770.00 CPR/First Aid Training
arc 17829 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
m 17830 EK Development Corporation 10,400.00 Wheeler Ridge Option Agreement MO 11-16-98
y 17831 EQE International,Inc. 520.00 Risk Assessment-Y2K Project
a 17832 Faxpress, Inc. 456.59 Office Supplies
17833 Federal Express Corp. 62.35 Air Freight
17834 Filter Supply Company 5.171.48 Filters
17935 Fisher Scientific Company LLC 1,145.03 Lab Supplies
17836 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 559.00 Concrete Cuffing
17837 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,829.05 Pump Supplies
17838 Fountain Valley Camera 49.50 Photo Supplies
17839 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 218.95 Truck Wash Tickets
17840 Franklin Covey 35.23 Office Supplies
17841 Fry's Electronics 1,074.08 Computer Supplies
17842 Full Spectrum Analy tics, Inc. 741.02 Lab Instrument Service
17843 G.F.O.A. 410.00 Membership
17844 GTE California 992.93 Telephone Services
17845 George Yardley Co. 450.19 Lab Supplies
17846 Getinge Castle 149.23 Lab Equipment Maintenance
17847 WW Grainger, Inc. 394.64 Compressor Supplies
17848 Graphic Distributors 3,436.15 Photographic Supplies
17849 Graseby STI 121.85 Engine Supplies
17860 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 681.86 Janitorial Supplies
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 3115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17861 Greyshock Trading Company 648.59 Lab Supplies
17852 GBC(General Binding Corp) 44.07 Office Supplies
17853 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI Intemational 1,081.78 Instrument Supplies
17854 Harbour Engineering Group 3,254.75 Pump Supplies
17855 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 245.35 Catering Services
17856 Hilfi 137.02 Tools
17857 The Holman Group 731.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium
17858 Holmes&Newer. Inc. 1,336.95 Engineering Services 2-40
17859 Home Depot 808.22 Small Hardware
17860 City of Huntington Beach 16,658A7 Water Use
17861 HI Standard Automotive 388.77 Automotive Supplies
17862 Idexx 1,138.71 Lab Supplies
17863 Imaging Plus, Inc. 300.51 Office Supplies
17864 Westceast Anaheim Hotel 7,272.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
17865 Voided Check - -
17866 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use
x 17867 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 2,326.37 Safety Supplies
17868 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 2,476.81 Training Expenses
H17869 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 4,981.63 Misc.Construction Services
a 17870 Jendham, Inc. 715.50 Registration
r 17871 Jim's Suspension Service 93.82 Truck Repairs
17872 John Lis"Pumps 64.65 Pump Supplies
17873 Johnstone Supply 1,028.55 Electrical Supplies
17874 K.P. Lindstrom 15,500.00 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
17875 Kelly Paper 12.07 Paper
17876 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,438.74 Tools
17877 LA. Cellular-Service 55.00 Cellular Telephone Supplies
17878 Lab Support 6,900.00 Temporary Employment Services
17879 LaserAll Corporation 2,535.28 Service Agreement
17880 Law/Crandall 3,535.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182
17881 League of Ca.Cifies,Orange County Div. 1,000.00 Speaker Sponsorship
17882 Lee&Ro, Inc. 5,972.60 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
17883 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Books&Publications
17884 Logical Devices, Inc. 1,632.94 Electrical Supplies
17885 LA Cellular Telephone Company 2,097.52 Cellular Telephone Service
17886 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 23,514.90 Engineering Services 2-37&J-62
17887 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,869.52 Welding Supplies
17888 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 29.16 Mechanical Supplies
17889 Mar Vac Electronics 71.27 Instrument Supplies
Page 4 of 9 -
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 3/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17890 Matt Chlor, Inc. 2,698.28 Valves
17891 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 43.00 Plumbing Supplies
17892 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,804.66 Tools
17893 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 6,255.10 Electrical Supplies
17894 Mechanical Drives Co. 440.15 Electrical Supplies
17895 Medlin Controls Co. 555.36 Instrument Supplies
17896 Mesa Muf0er 161.49 Truck Supplies
17897 Micro Flex 936.00 Gloves
17898 Tit Pole Corp/MicroAge 1,302.03 Software
17899 Mid-West Associates 8.791.40 Pump Supplies
17900 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,242.45 Mechanical Repairs
17901 Mission Uniform Service 3,804.63 Uniform Rentals
17902 Mitchell Instrument Co. 300.00 Instruments
17903 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 140.07 Publications
17904 MotoPhoto 37.48 Photographic Services
17905 MPS Photographic Services 22.09 Photographic Services
17906 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 982.00 Registration
17907 Neal Supply Co. 1,072.13 Plumbing Supplies
IMP
�+ 17908 Network Associates 3,274.83 Computer Consulting Services
H
> 17909 Network Construction Services 18,155.00 Construction Services-Wiring for J42
17910 Newark Electronics 65.24 Instrument Supplies
17911 City of Newport Beach 43.98 Water Use
17912 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 665.00 Lab Services
17913 NETG(National Education Training Group) 1,363.04 Software Training
17914 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,540.74 Office Supplies
17915 Optio Software 2,500.00 Software Training
17916 Orange County Pump Co. 2.790.73 Pump Supplies
17917 Oxygen Service Company 240.05 Specialty Gases
17918 OCB Reprographics 7.199.60 Printing Service-Spec P-173
17919 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 19,277.67 Electrical Supplies
17920 Pacific Bell 22.08 Telephone Services
17921 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,017.73 Plumbing Supplies
17922 Pagenet 1,686.00 Rental Equipment
17923 Parts Unlimited 406.46 Truck Supplies
17924 Peak Technologies 169.02 Lab Supplies
17925 Peerless Pump Company 1,650.51 Pump Supplies
17926 Pickard Design 3,912.19 Publication-Wastewater Mgmt. Brochure
17927 Quenterra Environmental Services 950.00 Analytical Service
17928 Quest Headquarters 1,000.00 Membership
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 3101/99 to 3115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17929 R. L.Abbott&Associates 2,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
17930 Radius Maps 275.00 Map
17931 Reliastar 15.879.26 Life Insurance Premium
17932 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.172.06 Life Insurance Premium
17933 Remedy Temp 3,072.24 Temporary Employment Services
17934 RM Controls 607.54 Instrument Supplies
17935 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 350.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents
17936 RMS Systems Inc. 259.00 Subscription-Software
17937 RPM Electric Motors 1.731.37 Electric Motor Repair
17938 Safelite Glass Corp. 118.04 Auto Supplies
17939 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 11.01 Mechanical Supplies
17940 Schwing America, Inc. 768.51 Pump Supplies
17941 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 167.40 Specialty Gases
17942 Sears Industrial Sales 79.14 Mechanical Supplies
17943 Seaventures 3,055.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
17944 Second-Sun 53.98 Light Fixtures
rn 17945 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 92.13 Tools
17946 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,509.44 Tools/Hardware
y 17947 Stemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
y 17948 Siena Automated Valve Services, Inc. 315.71 Plumbing Supplies
o. 17949 Snap-On Incorporated 328.95 Tools
17950 Southern California Water 65.29 Water Use
17951 Sparkletts 2,042.41 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
17952 Spoolmaster 363.37 Cable Reel Dispenser
17953 Sterling An 29.07 Art Supplies
17954 Steve Casada Construction Co. 3,450.00 Construction Services-Street Repair
17955 Vista 7,500.00 Computer Consulting Services
17956 Summit Information Resources 10,875.00 Computer Supplies
17957 Summit Steel 402.98 Metal
17958 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
17959 SCESA 40.00 Registration
17960 Tasew, Inc. 1,520.04 Valves
17961 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Lab Services
17962 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,164.44 Mechanical Supplies
17963 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
17964 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 91.09 Locks&Keys
17965 Top Hat Productions 225.14 Catering Services
17966 Tomell&Cotten 8,920.50 Legal Services-Cartel
17967 Tran Consulting Engineers 12,962.50 Consulting Services-Misc.Small Capital Projects
Page 6 of 9 - -
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 31IM9
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17968 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 339.85 Truck Supplies
17969 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 400.00 Lab Services
17970 Teksystems 7,040.50 Temporary Employment Services
17971 United Parcel Service 627.92 Parcel Services
17972 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Filters
17973 UNL Center for Leadership Dev. 158.00 Registration
17974 Unocal Corporation 130.47 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
17975 Vaicom 10,694.07 Software-Microsoft Project 98
17976 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,591.62 Plumbing Supplies
17977 Vector Resources 8,200.00 Cable Installation
17978 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,787.10 Door Repair
17979 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 22.403.20 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
17980 VWR Scientific 7.631.99 Lab Supplies
17981 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,867.05 Security Guards
17982 Wayne Electric Co. 1118.00 Electrical Supplies
17983 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 95.27 Electrical Supplies
17984 WEF Research Foundation 13.30 Publication
.+ 17985 Xerox Corporation 16,581.59 Copier Leases
17986 CNA Trust 21,577.10 Construction 541-1
y 17987 Michael C. Bock 254.40 Training Expense Reimb.
17988 Richard A. Castillon 200.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17989 Danny S. Evangelista 500.00 Training Expense
17990 Dean M. Fisher 267.65 Training Expense Reimb.
17991 Donald F. McIntyre 738.32 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17992 Patrick T. Pan 287.21 Training Expense Reimb,
17993 Rosa Aguilar&Comp USA 775.77 Employee Computer Loan Program
17994 Thomas Dodderer&Comuxpress 1,250.01 Employee Computer Loan Program
17995 County of Orange 2,130.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
17996 Orange County Sanitation District 228.02 Petty Cash Reimb.
17997 Calif Dolly&Supply 1,325.06 Equipment Rental
17998 Kelly J.Christensen 431.24 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17999 Converse Consultants 7,099.35 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
18000 Rick J. Hannappel 556.40 Training Expense Reimb.
18001 Donald F.McIntyre 1,220.86 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18002 Valley Cities Supply Company 442.63 Plumbing Supplies
18003 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 25.798.07 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
18004 Orange County Sanitation District 393,358.35 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
18005 Appleone Employment Service 6.308.00 Temporary Employment Services
18006 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 31O1199 to 3115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18007 RPIBio Gro 22,597.79 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
18008 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
18009 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 2,091.65 Electrical Supplies
18010 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 3.54 Truck Parts
18011 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
18012 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 5,946.73 10 Hard Drives& 1 Dell Notebook Computer
18013 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
18014 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
18015 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
18016 GTE California 1,785.44 Telephone Services
18017 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 75.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18018 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Gamishment
18019 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,817.37 Dues Deduction
18020 Airgas Direct Industdal-IPCO Safety Div. 1,056.83 Safety Supplies
18021 Mar Vac Electronics 341.14 Instrument Supplies
18022 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 407.25 Tools
18023 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 985.00 Registration
18024 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
H 18025 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
y 18026 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,042.98 Fittings
m 18027 Oxygen Service Company 2.555.75 Specialty Gases
18028 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction
18029 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
18030 Parker Hannifin Corporation 222.01 Mechanical Supplies
18031 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
18032 Peace Officers Council of CA 819.00 Dues Deduction
18033 Polydyne, Inc. 23.346.75 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
18034 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 335.37 Instrument Supplies
18035 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 19,956.01 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
18036 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 676.58 Tools/Hardware
18037 Southern California Edison 6,019.90 Power
18038 State of California 139.44 Wage Garnishment
18039 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 2,000.00 Landscape Maint.
18040 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 131.83 Mechanical Supplies
18041 The Unisource Corporation 981.35 Office Supplies
18042 United Parcel Service 41.00 Parcel Services
18043 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
18044 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 8.191.16 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
18045 Western States Chemical, Inc. 9,759.23 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 3101199 to 3/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18046 Mike J. Herrera 183.00 Training Expense Reimb.
18047 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 48,294.40 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,712,183.18
Payroll Disbursements
13200-13337 Employee Paychecks $ 182,475.52 Bimekly Payroll 3/10/99
13338-13341 Employee Paychecks 3.335.13 Termination,Replacement and Retro Paychecks
13342-13362 Directors'Paychecks 4,747.10 Payroll 3115/99
35533-35978 Direct Deposit Statements 633,359.54 Biweekly Payroll 3/10/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 823,917.29
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 151,680.27 March Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 151.148.99 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Sense A Certificate of Deposits
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 83,114.16 Quarterly Liquidity on Series C Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank&Trust 126,162.13 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 511.105.55
N
� Total Claims Paid 3/1/99 -3/15/99 $ 4,047,206.02
H
9
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116/99 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
18048 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. $ 33,938.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
18049 Barclays Bank PLC 90,667.39 COP Letter of Credit
18050 Brown&Caldwell 156,783.33 Engineering Services P1-37
18051 Carollo Engineers 54,115.08 Engineering Services J-254&Y2K Project
18052 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 34,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Program&Y2K Project
18053 CRISP Automation Systems 50,000.00 Plant Automation Computer Maint.Service-Media&Documentation Support
18064 Delta Dental 38,059.08 Dental Insurance Plan
18055 Robert F. Driver Associates 71,286.00 Boiler&Machinery Insurance MO 6-10-92 -
18056 James Martin&Co. 67,427.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project
18057 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,597.77 Medical Insurance Premium
18058 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 25,575.70 Engineering Services J-62
18059 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 245,092.00 Toilet Exchange Program
18060 Nat West Markets 65,407.82 COP Letter of Credit Fees
18061 Orange County Water District 87.123.60 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
18062 Parsons Engineering Science 145,826.85 Engineering Services J42
P] 18063 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 94.837.63 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
.+ 18064 S&S Power Engineering, Inc. 26.068.24 Electrical Supplies-5 Charge Systems
r 18065 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 114,615.89 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94
.s 18066 Southern California Edison 45,734.92 Power
p0 18067 Square D Company 83.272.44 Software Maint.Agreement
" 18068 SPEC Services, Inc. 23e,536.20 Engineering Services J-33-1
18069 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 62.281.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
18070 United Healthcare 129,434.79 Medical Health Insurance
18071 Vapex, Inc. 31,656.63 Foul Air Monitors
18072 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 224,111.00 Construction P2-35-5&J-34-1
18073 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 31.206.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
18074 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 5.07 Long Distance Telephone Services
18075 AccuStandard 1,134.50 Lab Supplies
18076 Air Products&Chemicals 22,914.78 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
18077 Airborne Express 25.25 Air Freight
18078 Allied Supply Company 4,806.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18079 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 152.45 Instrument Supplies
18080 American Training Resources, Inc. 808.13 Training Materials
18081 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 533.60 Lab Supplies
18082 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 180.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
18083 Applied Industrial Technology 14.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies
18084 Arizona Instrument-Jerome Division 641.33 Instrument Maint. Service
18085 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 520.00 Vacuum Truck Services
Page 1 of 16 -
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18086 Asbury Environmental Services 230.00 Waste Oil Removal
18087 Atlantis Pod Care 235.00 Service Agreement
18088 ABB Industrial Systems Inc. 1.055.83 Electrical Parts&Supplies
18089 AGFA Educational Publishing 173.25 Publications
18090 AKM Consulting Engineers 3.318.09 Consulting Services 11-17-3& 11-20
18091 AMAIKeye Productivity Center 410.00 Registration
18092 The Assoc. of Records Managers&Admin. 100.00 Membership
18093 ASTD 229.00 Membership
18094 AWSI 199.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
18095 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 275.84 Telephone Installation
18096 Beach Paving, Inc. 11.475.00 Asphalt Repair
18097 BearCom 640.03 Communication Equipment
18098 BioSpherical Instruments, Inc. 265.23 Lob Supplies
18099 Boyle Engineering Corporation 9.034.08 Engineering Services 3-38.1,7-7.1
18100 Bristol Systems, Inc. 12,533.90 Consulting Services-Y2K Protect
18101 Burke Engineering Co. 510.13 Electrical Supplies
18102 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1.640.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25.97
18103 Business Week 37.95 Subscription-IT
w 18104 SC Wire Rope&Rigging 163.78 Rope
H 18105 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 1,300.00 Training Registration
18108 BNI Building News 1,315.58 Publication
r" 18107 C&H Distributions 293.71 Handling Equipment
18100 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,917.85 Pump Supplies
18109 CA Contractors License Exam Canted 8682 595.00 Registration
18110 CWEA 180.00 Membership
18111 Camak Corp. 4,562.50 Maint. Service Agreement
18112 Canus Corporation 553.75 Fiber Optic Cable
18113 Carter-America Fleet Service 71.24 Truck Supplies
18114 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 1,125.68 Office Furniture
18115 Chemwatch, Inc. 15.00 Plans&Specs Overpayment Refund
18116 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 2,172.08 Professional Services-Ergonomic
18117 Compaq Computer Corporation 300.62 Computer Supplies
18118 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 2,639.49 Electrical Supplies
18119 Contemporary Controls 9,395.28 Computer Supplies
18120 Control Concepts Corp. 308.50 Electrical Supplies
18121 Cooper Energy Services 409.04 Engine Supplies
18122 Corporate Express 1.095.61 Office Supplies
16123 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 700,00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09
18124 Cost Containment Solutions 292.51 Workers Comp. Services
Page 2 of 16
Claims Paid From 3110199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18125 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18128 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 242.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee
18127 County of Orange 745.15 Communication Maim. Service Agreement
18128 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,143.55 Electrical Supplies
18129 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
18130 CR&R, Inc. 5,985.00 Container Rentals
18131 CWEA Annual Conference 2,561.00 Conference Registration
18132 CWEA Y2K 90.00 Registration
18133 Daily Pilot 100.00 Notices&Ads
18134 Dapper Tire Co. 630.36 Truck Tires
18135 Datavault 117.50 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage
18136 David B. Hart 1,288.00 Advisory Arbitrator Fee
18137 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 1.939.51 10 Computer Hard Drives
18138 CDFA-FRE 15.00 Publication
18139 DeZudk CIO Misco/SouthWest 1.086.12 Valves
18140 Dover Elevator Company 856.00 Elevator Maintenance
18141 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 42.58 Paint Supplies
,., 18142 DGA Consultants, Inc. 6,762.40 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
18143 Edward R. Eisenhauser 620.00 Professional Service-Financial
"s 18144 Electra-Bond 985.91 Mechanical Supplies
18145 Electrical Work, Inc. 3,885.88 Electrical Supplies
r" 18146 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Oman Monitoring MO 5-24-95
18147 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,820.40 Lab Services
18148 Executive Excellence 103.00 Publication
18149 ETI Systems 176.51 Electrical Supplies
18150 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 516.23 Maint. Service Agreement
18151 Federal Express Corp. 143.40 Air Freight
18152 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 428.72 Lab Supplies
18153 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 260.00 Concrete Cuffing
18154 Flo-Systems, Inc. 11,510.51 Pump Supplies
18155 Fluke Electronics Corporation 314.00 Electrical Supplies
18156 Fountain Valley Camara 449.46 Photo Supplies
18157 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 187.49 Truck Wash Tickets
18158 City of Fountain Valley 1,865.00 Hazardous Material Disclosure Fees
18159 Foxboro Company 1.965.03 Instrument Supplies
18160 Franklin Covey 27.76 Office Supplies
18161 Fry's Electronics 67.81 Computer Supplies
18162 Ganahl Lumber Company 301.12 Lumber/Hardware
18163 Garraff-Callahan Company 3,852.08 Chemicals
Page 3 of 16 -
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18164 General Binding Corporation 248.51 Printing
18165 GTE California 5,532.83 Telephone Services
18166 Geomatrix Consultants 10,516.80 Legal Services
18167 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 17,550.18 Pump Supplies
18168 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
18169 W W Grainger, Inc. 701.57 Compressor Supplies
18170 Graphic Controls 133.61 Office Supplies
18171 Graphic Design Book Club 22.92 Books
18172 Graphic Distributors 167.83 Photographic Supplies
18173 Graphic Intelligence Agency 179.00 Registration
18174 Graseby STI 6,788.36 Engine Supplies
18175 Great American Printing Co. 138.44 Printing Service
111176 Hach Company 56.61 Lab Supplies
18177 Hanna Instruments 401.51 Instrument Supplies
18178 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice
18179 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 609.08 Plumbing Supplies
n 18180 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 146.12 Catering Services
x 18181 Hilti 1.709.96 Tools
W 18182 Home Depot 1.510.79 Small Hardware
H 18183 Hub Auto Supply 262.58 Truck Pads
m 18184 HB Digital Arts&HS Blueprint 51.72 Printing Service
r 18185 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,014.99 Office Supplies
18186 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 594.76 Lab Supplies
18187 Interstate Battery Systems 321.90 Batteries
18188 IBM Corporation 6,399.37 Service Contract
18189 IOMA's Pay for Performance Report 217.95 Publication
18190 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 200.27 Safety Supplies
18191 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,033.74 Instrument Supplies
18192 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 6,538.16 Misc. Construction Services
18193 Jay's Catering 500.28 Catering Services
18194 Johnstone Supply 18.03 Electrical Supplies
18195 K.P. Lindstrom 7,094.00 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
18196 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 23,448.35 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
18197 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 2,621.93 Electronic Workstation
18198 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,858.36 Tools
18199 KADY International 2,500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental
18200 KTA-TATOR, Inc. 3,535.00 Maint. Consulting Service
18201 Lab Support 2,880.00 Temporary Employment Services
18202 LaserAll Corporation. 75.00 Service Agreement
Page 4 of 16
Claims Paid From 3/16/99 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18203 Lee 8 Re, Inc. 1,418.00 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
18204 Long Beach Uniform Co.,Inc. 839.59 Uniforms
18205 Maintenance Products, Inc. 7.773.00 Mechanical Supplies
18206 Mar Vac Electronics 95.68 Instrument Supplies
18207 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,095.58 Tools
18208 Medlin Controls Co. 672.32 Instrument Supplies
18209 Metal Finishing 60.00 Subscription
18210 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 14,729.66 Software Maint.Agreement
18211 Mid-West Associates 7,345.74 Pump Supplies
18212 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,089.13 Mechanical Repairs
18213 Milltronics, Inc. 1,957.30 Electrical Supplies
18214 Mission Uniform Service 3,394.43 Uniform Rentals
18215 Moody's Investors Service 5.000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
18216 Multifome Systems Corp. 9,040.00 Computer Equip. Services-Fuel Mgmt. System
18217 MPS Photographic Services 39.89 Photographic Services
18218 MSA C/O Mag Systems 664.55 Safety Supplies
18219 Nasco 534.27 Instrument Supplies
.a 18220 National Fire Protection Association 453.45 Publication
y18221 National Miuocomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
18222 National Plant Services,Inc. 3.360.00 Vacuum Truck Services
u 18223 Neal Supply Co. 612.82 Plumbing Supplies
18224 Network Construction Services 1,140.00 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project
18225 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1.099.00 Software Training Classes
111226 New Pig 1,092.65 Spill Absorbent Materials
18227 Newark Electronics 211.99 Instrument Supplies
18228 City of Newport Beach 44.37 Water Use
18229 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 9,337.57 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
18230 Ninyo 8 Moore 3,538.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
18231 The Norco Companies 119.30 Mail Delivery Service
18232 NAS Associates, Inc. 1,587.75 Lab Services
18233 Northwestern Carbon 1,314.55 Filters
18234 Occupational Vision Services 189.52 Safety Glasses
111235 Once Depot Business Services Div. 723.24 Office Supplies
18236 Omni Western Incorporated 225.91 Tools
18237 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 706.83 Electrical Supplies
18238 Orange Courier 34.20 Courier Services
18239 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 231.41 Fittings
18240 Oxygen Service Company 3,239.63 Specialty Gases
18241 OCB Reprographics 621.82 Printing Service-Spec P-173
Page 5 of 16 .,
Claims Paid From 3/16199 to 3/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18242 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 341.50 Electrical Supplies
18243 Pacific Bell 17.38 Telephone Services
18244 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services
18245 Pacific Mechanical Supply 750.11 Plumbing Supplies
18246 Pagenet 1,713.94 Rental Equipment
18247 Parkhouse Tire Co. 391.27 Tires
18248 Parts Unlimited 1,184.00 Truck Supplies
18249 Paul-Munroe Enenech 65.75 Electrical Supplies
18250 Pave West 4,485.80 Construction P140-3
18251 Peak Technologies 1,542.36 Lab Supplies
18252 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 9,359.33 Lab Supplies
18253 Petco Animal Supplies 117.43 Lab Supplies
18254 Polydyne, Inc. 14,229.08 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
18255 Portion Industries 2,907.63 Instrument Supplies
18256 Power Systems Testing Company 1,250.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services
18257 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin.
18258 Print Management Group, Inc. 2,829.62 Printing Services
r. 18259 Putzmeister 170.19 Pump Supplies
.p0. 18260 Radian International 15,200.00 Professional Services-Emission Testing
"s 18261 Remedy Temp 5,036.13 Temporary Employment Services
18262 RBF Engineers 10,200.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1
° 18263 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 282.84 Video Production Service
18264 RM Controls 49.72 Instrument Supplies
18265 RMS Engineering 8 Design, Inc. 600.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents
18266 RPM Electric Motors 2,770.55 Electric Motor Repair
18267 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 1,019.75 Mechanical Supplies
18268 Saratoga Institute 913.18 Publication
18269 Sceptre Advanced Business Solutions 3,716.20 Software Maint.Agreement
18270 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 613.22 Specialty Gases
18271 Seagate Software 4,500.00 Software Onsite Training
18272 Second-Sun 1,212.69 Light Fixtures
18273 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 268.02 Tools
18274 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,132.82 Tools/Hardware
18275 Smith Pipe 8 Supply, Inc. 130.24 Plumbing Supplies
18276 So.Cal. Gas Company 14,841.08 Natural Gas
18277 Sparklefts 1,871.79 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
18278 Special Plastic Systems, Inc. 2,764.83 Accumulators
18279 Specialty Solutions 800.00 Computer Consulting Services
18280 Sprint 47.39 Long Distance Telephone Service
Page 6 of 16
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18281 Standard Supply&Equipment Co., Inc. 10.12 Pump Supplies
18282 Strata Intemational, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
18283 Summit Steel 1,043.78 Metal
18284 BARBS 270.00 Membership
18285 SCAP 8,688.00 Consulting Service-Joint Accidental Release Prevention Program
18286 The Register 208.25 Notices&Ads
18287 ThirdWave 10,533.64 Professional Services-Document Management Project
18288 Thomas M. Dawes 4,590.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97
18289 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,728.61 Mechanical Supplies
18290 Time Motion Tools 1,027.93 Tools
18291 Titan Power, Inc. 3.149.82 Battery Replacement
18292 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 331.23 Locks&Keys
18293 Tornell&Cotten 3,587.80 Legal Services-Cartel
18294 Southern California Trans Service 422.82 Electrical Supplies
18295 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 84.26 Truck Supplies
18296 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 398.70 Truck Supplies
18297 Yu Li Tsai 743.17 Training Expense Relmb.
18298 Two Wheels One Planet 135.60 Bicycle Supplies
y 18299 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.76 Fillers
18300 United Parcel Service 27.07 Parcel Services
18301 The University of Toledo-SeaGate Centre 475.00 Registration
18302 Unocal Corporation 25.70 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
18303 U-Line 773.81 Plastic Storage Bags for Warehouse
18304 V&A Consulting Engineers 24,441.62 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase 11
18305 Valley Cities Supply Company 176.08 Plumbing Supplies
18306 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 862.41 Electrical Supplies
18307 Vertex, Inc. 820.57 Office Furniture
18308 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 8,592.91 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
18309 VWR Scientific 3,593.03 Lab Supplies
18310 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,849.42 Security Guards
18311 Waters Corporation 587.11 Service Agreement
18312 Waxle Sanitary Supply 140.83 Janitorial Supplies
18313 Wayne Electric Co. 168.00 Electrical Supplies
18314 Westamenca Graphics 2,260.06 Photographic Services
18315 Wilmington Instrument Co., Inc. 284.99 Equipment Repair
18316 Workforce 59.00 Subscription
18317 Xerox Corporation e,770.66 Copier Leases
10318 Yokogawa Corp.of America 285.38 Instrument Supplies
18319 201h Century Plastics,Inc. 77.83 Office Supplies
Page 7 of 16
Claims Paid From 3116/99 to 3131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18320 Blake Anderson 606.13 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18321 Nicholas J.Arhontes 299.89 Training Expense Reimb.
18322 Robert M.Bell 115.50 Training Expense Reimb.
18323 James Cong 621.64 Training Expense Reimb.
18324 Douglas I.Cook 738.85 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18325 Michael D.White 415.65 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18326 Charles F.Winsor 1,602.01 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18327 County of Orange 870.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
18328 Todd A.May 2,489.08 Employee Computer Loan Program
18329 Orange County Sanitation District 11,997.80 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
18330 Orange County Sanitation District 1,219.73 Petty Cash Reimb.
18331 Todd Jacobson and Best Buy 2,655.09 Employee Computer Loan Program
18332 Orange County Sanitation District 407,155.26 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
18333 Abesco 184.39 Hardware
18334 Assoc.of Metro. Sewerage Agencies 550.00 Registration
18335 ASTD Publishing Service 61.90 Publication
x 18336 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 2,020.00 Electrical Equipment Maint.
.x. 18337 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
H 18338 Boyle Engineering Corporation 828.00 Engineering Services-Computer Assisted Design&Drafting Sid. Manual
18339 Brithinee Electric 307.44 Electrical Supplies
18340 Cal Protection 448.24 Electrical Services
00 18341 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 100.00 Membership
18342 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
18343 CompEd Solutions 1,185.00 Registration
18344 Compusa,Inc. 330.00 Computer Software
18345 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,726.55 Electrical Supplies
18346 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 8.72 Plumbing Supplies
18347 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
18348 CASA 290.00 Conference Registration
18349 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
18350 Enlightened Leadership International 299.00 Seminar Registration
18351 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 912.40 Lab Services
18352 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
18353 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
18354 Garratt-Callahan Company 655.12 Chemicals
18355 Hyatt Regency Capitol Park 140.00 Registration
18356 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 16.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18357 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
18358 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,81T37 Dues Deduction
Page 8 of 16
Claims Paid From 3/16199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18359 Alrgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 485.06 Safety Supplies
18360 Mar Vac Electronics 460.47 Instrument Supplies
18381 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 220.86 Tools
18362 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.15 Office Supplies
18363 Orange County Family Support 1.180.78 Wage Garnishment
18364 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
18365 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 112.12 Electrical Supplies
18366 Orange Valve& Fitting Company 206.76 Fittings
18387 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction
18368 Court Order 40.00 Wage Gamishment
18369 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
18370 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
18371 Quark Distribution 062.19 Computer Supplies
18372 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 104.01 Paint Supplies
18373 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 594.71 Tools
18374 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,032.24 Tools/Hardware
18375 Simon,Larsen&Marsh 160.00 Registration
to 18375 So. Cal.Gas Company 8,784.91 Natural Gas
y 18377 State of California 121.96 Wage Garnishment
ae 18378 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton, LP. 125.00 Registration
e 18379 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 544.42 Mechanical Supplies
18380 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
18381 ULI 375.00 Registration
18382 VWR Scientific 799.24 Lab Supplies
18383 Xerox Corporation 63.88 Copier Supplies
18384 James R.Davidson 148.81 Publication Expense Reimb.
18385 Frank G. Schultz 694.57 Training Expense Reimb.
18386 RPI1Bi0 Gro 30.613.23 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
18387 Bristol Systems, Inc. 44,584.15 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
18388 Brown&Caldwell 77,746.94 Engineering Services J-35.1
18389 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 30,849.91 8 Latitude Notebook Computers
18390 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 140.653.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4.22-98
18391 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 85,284.95 Natural Gas-Spec 8 P-170
18392 James Martin&Co. 32,195.00 Professional Services-Data Integration Project
18393 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 71,372.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
18394 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 36,055.00 Engineering Services J-62
18395 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 27.432.56 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
18396 Pacificare of Ca. 35,831.79 Health Insurance Premium
18397 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 82,215.71 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
Page 9 of 16
Claims Paid From 3116/99 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18398 Southern California Edison 52,926.98 Power
18399 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 57,980.44 Residuals Removal MO 3-29415
18400 Western States Chemical, Inc. 29.903.58 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
18401 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 98.140.84 Legal Services MO 7-26.95
18402 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 38,000.00 Construction P2-35.5&J-34-1
18403 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 209,388.60 Construction 5-41-1
18404 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 115,901.00 Construction 7.17
18405 Mike Prlioh&Sons 390.795.00 Construction 8-12
18406 A T&T Corporation 0.82 Long Distance Telephone Services
18407 A T&T Corporation 1.801.53 Long Distance Telephone Services
18408 A T&T Corporation 10.38 Long Distance Telephone Services
18409 A T&T Corporation 415.18 Long Distance Telephone Services
18410 A-Plus Systems 4,165.88 Notices&Ads
18411 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 169.60 Engine Testing J-19
18412 Air Duct Cleaning Company 4.299.00 Air Duct Cleaning Services
18413 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 0&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8.89
18414 Airborne Express 10.75 Air Freight
18415 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing Assoc. 13.95 Subscription
H 18416 Allied Supply Company 3,766.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
"1 18417 American Airlines 5,517.40 Travel Services
b0r 18418 American Banker Newsletters 1,131.38 Subscription
0 18419 American Seals West 107.01 Gaskets
18420 Anchor Paving 8,800.00 Raise Manholes
18421 Appleone Employment Service 4,750.92 Temporary Employment Services
18422 Applied Industrial Technology 12.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies
18423 Arizona Instrument-Jerome Division 1,287.90 Instrument Supplies
18424 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,079.00 Vacuum Truck Services
18425 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 620.80 Waste Removal
18426 Asbury Environmental Services 220.00 Waste Oil Removal
18427 Ashrae 499.00 Publication
18428 Atlantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
18429 Awards&Trophies By Bea 24.57 Plaques
18430 ASM 416.00 Registration
18431 Barnes&Noble Books 172.20 Publication
18432 Battery Specialties 331.83 Batteries
18433 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 193.95 Office Supplies
18434 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 26.85 Lab Supplies
18435 BloSouroe Solutions, Inc. 6,016.90 Consulting Servicce-Biosolids&Watershed
18436 Black&Veatch 1.893.48 Engineering Services P146&P2-55
Page 10 of 16
Claims PaW From 3116199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18437 Bloomberg L.P. 6.276.64 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93
18438 Boise Radiator Service 75.00 Truck Repairs
18439 Boutwell&Ennor, L.L.P. 417.50 Legal Services-401a Plan
18440 Builders Book, Inc. 84.51 Publication
18441 Burke Engineering Co. 489.95 Electrical Supplies
18442 Bush&Associates, Inc. 4,404.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
18443 Butterworth-Heinemann 601.34 Publication
18444 Buy.Com 18,665.02 Computer Supplies
18445 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1,328.30 Rope
18446 Calif Centrifugal Pump 7,094.72 Pump Supplies
18447 California Automatic Gate 200.00 Service Agreement
18448 Carbonic Products, Inc. 40.00 Lab Supplies
18449 Carol Electric Company,Inc. 7,452.00 Electrical Services - GAP Water Meter
18450 Carollo Engineers 1,760.02 Engineering Services P2-50&J-34
16451 Carollo Engineers 7.369.44 Engineering Services Pi-36-2
18452 Cartier Corporation 63.93 Publication
18453 Ceiling Systems 1,227.27 Ceiling Tile
�.., 18454 Charles P. Crowley Co. 12.35 Instrument Parts
18455 City of Fountain Valley 14.888.88 Water Use
's 18456 Coastal Conservancy 18.00 Subscription
m 18457 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 81.02 Lab Supplies
.- 18458 Compuserve Incorporated 59.80 Computer Services
18459 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,112.77 Electrical Supplies
18460 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 5.82 Plumbing Supplies
18461 Continental-McLaughlin 110.94 Tools
18462 Converse Consultants 1,770.50 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
18463 Cooper Cameron Corporation 3,642.14 Engine Supplies
18464 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
18465 Corporate Express Imaging 1,961.69 Misc.Computer Supplies
18466 Corporate Express 1,346.66 Office Supplies
18467 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 82.03 Truck Pads
1808 Cotelligent 3,099.93 Professional Services-Computer
18469 County of Orange 540.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
18470 County Wholesale Electric Co. 810.27 Electrical Supplies
18471 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
18472 Cytec Industries 2,654.75 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18
18473 CASA 290.00 Conference Registration
18474 CHMIA 175.00 Registration
18475 David's Tree Service 3,000.00 Tree Removal
Page 11 of 16 .,
Claims Paid From 3116/99 to 3131199 w
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18476 Del Mar Analytical 1,180.00 Biosolids Analysis
18477 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 1,223.15 Valves
18478 Dover Elevator Company 1,586.10 Elevator Maintenance
18479 DGA Consultants, Inc. 7,849.78 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
18480 E&A Environmental Consultants 604.38 Professional Service-Wheeler Ridge Site
18481 EBMUD-Activity 7945,Job#29510 16.948.74 Professional Service-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study
18482 Electra-Bond 4,013.69 Mechanical Supplies
18483 Enchanter, Inc. 3.500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
18484 Environmental Data Solutions Groups, L.L.C. 6,000.00 Professional Services-Air quality Info. Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
18485 Worldwide Services Group Logistics Ctr. 186.02 Publication
18486 ESP Industries, Inc. 102.47 Mechanical Supplies
18487 Federal Express Corp. 132.80 Air Freight
18488 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 161.71 Lab Supplies
18489 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 269.00 Concrete Cutting
18490 Flickinger Co 739.40 Valve
18491 Flo-Systems, Inc. 2,184.95 Pump Supplies
r'r 18492 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,294.19 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
18493 Fountain Valley Camera 27.48 Photo Supplies
Gtl 18494 Foxboro Co. 50.00 Publications
H
H 18495 Fry's Electronics 997.47 Computer Supplies
19496 City of Fullerton 95.75 Water Use
N 18497 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 278.76 Road Base Materials
18498 GTE California 904.63 Telephone Services
18499 Global Engineering&Management 8.800.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention
18500 W W Grainger, Inc. 161.60 Compressor Supplies
18501 Graseby STI 296.41 Engine Supplies
18502 Graybar Electric Company 327.77 Electrical Supplies
18503 Great American Printing Co. 433.73 Printing Service
18504 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 400.57 Janitorial Supplies
18505 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 ice
18506 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 93.27 Plumbing Supplies
18507 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 225.15 Catering Services
18508 Hewlett-Packard 397.60 Lab Supplies
18509 Hilti, Inc. 137.02 Tools
18510 Hilton,Famkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 3,780.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study
18511 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 267.42 Compressor Parts
18512 Holiday Inn 60.00 Registration
18513 The Holman Group 1,455.50 Employee Assistance Program Premium
16514 Holmes&Newer. Inc. 21,868.24 Engineering Services 241
Page 12 of 16
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18515 Home Depot 28.19 Small Hardware
18516 Hub Auto Supply 55.08 Truck Pans
18517 City of Huntington Beach 16,659.47 Water Use
18518 Hyatt Regency Capitol Park 280.00 Registration
18519 HOW Design Conference 670.00 Registration
18520 HR Direct 40.94 Publication
18521 Impulse 77.11 Lab Supplies
18522 Industrial Fitter Manufacturers, Inc. 3,080.58 Filters
18523 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 82.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18524 Information Resources 425.00 Personnel Services
18525 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 77.92 Lab Supplies
18526 Irvine Ranch Water District 190.08 Water Use
18527 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 230.84 Safety Supplies
18528 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 13,624.40 Instrument Supplies
18529 Jay's Catering 2,017.60 Catering Services
18530 Jobtrak 90.00 Notices&Ads
18531 John Uses Pumps 2,434.08 Pump Supplies
18532 Johnson Power Ltd. 14,918.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
H 18533 Johnstone Supply 865.20 Electrical Supplies
18534 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,135.24 Tools
,! 18535 Lab Support 6,329.69 Temporary Employment Services
18536 LaserAll Corporation 601.91 Service Agreement
18537 Law Journal Seminars-Press 87.50 Publications
18538 LaMotte Company 168.72 Sulfide Test Kit
18539 Lee&Ro, Inc. 6.644.72 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
18540 Lexis-Nexis 370.44 Books&Publications
18541 Limitorque Corp 1,388.63 Valves
18542 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 889.00 Architectural Services
18543 AT&T Wireless Service 1,842.33 Cellular Telephone Service
18544 Maintenance Technology Corp. 58.02 Welding Supplies
18545 Mc Junkin Corporation 357.39 Plumbing Supplies
18546 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,342.19 Tools
18547 Medlin Controls Co. 1,294.48 Instrument Supplies
18548 Mesa Muffler 136.97 Truck Supplies
18649 Micro Flex 864.00 Gloves
18550 Mid-West Associates 18.521.51 Pump Supplies
18551 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,730.23 Mechanical Repairs
18652 Mission Abrasive Supplies 50.29 Tools&Supplies
18553 Mission Uniform Service 3,374.85 Uniform Rentals
Page 13 of 16 --
Claims Paid From 3/16199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18554 Mitchell Instrument Co. 726.00 Instruments
18555 MotoPhoto 63.11 Photographic Services
18556 National Academy Press 66.17 Publication
18557 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 3.00 Registration Unpaid Balance
18558 Neal Supply Co. 820.96 Plumbing Supplies
18559 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 800.00 Software Training Classes
18560 The Norco Companies 119.00 Mail Delivery Service
18561 NorCal SETAC 155.00 Registration
1a562 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,219.03 Office Supplies
18563 Interior Resources and/or Off Pavilion 500.00 Office Furniture
18564 Orange County Forum 30.00 Registration
18565 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 2.936.02 Electrical Supplies
18566 Oxygen Service Company 1.027.63 Specialty Gases
18567 OCB Reprographics 3,875.05 Printing Service-Spec P-173
18568 Pacific Bell 1.185.54 Telephone Services
18569 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,796.91 Plumbing Supplies
18570 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,263.82 Tires
18571 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 7.538.00 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
.ma 18572 Polydyne, Inc. 23,301.80 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
`a 18573 Postmaster General 550.00 Post Office Box Rental
i° 18574 Paver Pumps,Inc. 296.15 Pump Supplies
r 18575 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 2,745.83 Mechanical Supplies
18576 PSB Industries 271.37 Electrial Supplies
18577 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 363.70 Instrument Supplies
18578 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,324.52 Trash Removal
18579 Rapport Leadership International 1,420.00 Registration
18580 Reliastar 8,016.00 Life Insurance Premium
18581 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,164.06 Life Insurance Premium
19582 Remedy Temp 3,773.62 Temporary Employment Services
18583 Richardson Engineering Services, Inc. 1.197.00 Training Registration
18584 RBF Engineers 7,000.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1
18585 Ronan Engineering Co. 205.42 Electrical Supplies
18586 RPM Electric Motors 2,747.32 Electric Motor Repair
18587 Safelite Glass Corp. 162.35 Auto Supplies
18588 Safety-Kleen 409.99 Service Agreement
18589 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 53.22 Mechanical Supplies
18590 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 2.254.72 Specialty Gases
18591 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 335.00 Lab Repairs
18592 Sears Industrial Sales 987.22 Mechanical Supplies
Page 14 of 16
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18593 Second-Sun 335.41 Light Fixtures
18594 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 792.87 ToolsfHardware
18595 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
18596 Supelco, Inc. 347.79 Lab Supplies
18597 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 351.60 Emission Fees
18598 South Coast Army&Navy Sales 645.69 Safety Equipment
18599 Southern California Edison 1,760.00 Registration
18600 Standard&Poor's 1,000.00 Analytical Services
18601 Sterling Art 22.57 Art Supplies
18602 Summit Steel 606.61 Metal
18603 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4.420.00 Landscape Maint.
18604 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 790.00 Mechanical Supplies
18605 Sunset Ford 878.28 Truck Supplies
18606 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,530.42 Mechanical Supplies
18607 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies
18608 SHRM 99 1,150.00 Registration
18609 Thorpe Insulation 59.18 Plumbing Supplies
18610 Southern California Trans Service 1.106.53 Electrical Supplies
m
H 18611 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 420.30 Truck Supplies
18612 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 2.420.00 Lab Services
18613 Turblex, Inc. 835.00 Computer Software
18614 Tustin Dodge 5.97 Truck Supplies
18615 Two Wheels One Planet 502.07 Bicycle Supplies
18816 Teksyslems 7,924.00 Temporary Employment Services
18617 Unifirst Corp. 3,000.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
18618 The Uniscurce Corporation 6,339.93 Office Supplies
18619 United Parcel Service 344.19 Parcel Services
18620 Valcom 28.55 Software-Microsoft Project 98
18621 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,585.47 Plumbing Supplies
18622 Veme's Plumbing 1,385.00 Plumbing Supplies
18623 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,585.14 Vision Service Premium
18624 VWR Scientific 2,944.59 Lab Supplies
18625 The Wackenhut Corporation 9.124.56 Security Guards
18626 The Wall Street Journal 188.56 Subscription
18627 Water Environment Federation 120.00 Membership
18628 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 265.66 Electrical Supplies
18629 Westmx International 95.90 Truck Supplies
18630 Xerox Corporation 6,702.01 Copier Leases
18631 CNA Trust 23,265.40 Construction 541-1
Page 15 of 16 .,
Claims Paid From 3116199 to 3131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18632 Olsson Construction, Inc. 5,152A0 Construction P2-39-1
18633 Bradley H. Cagle 457.72 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18634 Michael J. Chester 250.00 Training Expense
18635 Danny S. Evangelista 2,323.68 Training Expense Reimb.
18636 Cann Q.Nguyen 905.55 Training Expense Reimb.
18637 Robert Dolan 1,175.18 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18638 Robert Ortega&Micro Center 1.081.23 Employee Computer Loan Program
18639 Andrew J.Rozenstraten 830.55 Training Expense Reimb.
18640 Municipal Treasurers'Association 175.00 Membership
18641 Orange County Sanitation District 1,111.69 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,549,954.75
Payroll Disbursements
13363-13502 Employee Paychecks $ 185.358.97 Biweekly Payroll 3/24/99
13503-13518 Employee Paychecks 164,907.32 Termination&Voided Paychecks
35979-36423 Direct Deposit Statements 649,053.24 Biweekly Payroll 3124/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 999,319.53
y Total Claims Paid 3116/99-3131199 $ 6,549,274.28
H
N
H
�Hy
I
P
Page 16 of 16
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date ro BG.dDir.
' 6/26/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Remyymbe
Orange County Sanitation District S�
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
H 1wm VnU3 4,090�H FILES ta'.—Pa,d O«
n.—.a a e Page t
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 4/1/99 -- 4/15/99 & 4/16/99 —4/30/99.
BA
N1wp UI9VinV$P3a.gQe1W9FILEs9.im5..i.aoc
R.,. MOW Page 2
Claims Paid From 4J1199 to 4115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
18642 Systems Integrated $ 52,177.79 Construction Services J-31-3
18643 Rick J.Hannappel 556.40 APICS Training Reimb.
18644 Orange County Sanitation District 488,982.96 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
18645 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
18646 Mark Castillo 1,481.50 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18647 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
18648 Computers America, Inc. 1,207.80 Computer Supplies
18649 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 2,202.41 Electrical Supplies
18650 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
18651 CASA 145.00 Conference Registration
18652 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
18653 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 258.94 Paint Supplies
18654 DSI:Data Systems International 4,461.93 4.19GB Disk Unit for AS400
18655 Foss Environmental 60.49 Publication
18656 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
18657 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
18658 Gartner Group Inc. 1,395.00 Conference Registration
18659 GTE California 605.13 Telephone Services
18660 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 198.95 Plumbing Supplies
18661 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 4.95 Compressor Parts
18662 StateNet 165.00 Online Service
18663 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
18664 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
18665 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
18666 Lessons in Leadership 279.00 Registration
18667 McMaster-Can-Supply Co. 505.30 Tools
18668 Mission Abrasive Supplies 130.11 Tools 8 Supplies
18669 Motion Industries 1,448.55 Pump Supplies
18670 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 349.00 Registration
18671 Optio Software 11,800.00 NT Upgrade 8 Annual Maint.
18672 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
18673 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
18674 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 2,145.58 Electrical Supplies
18675 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 116.44 Fittings
18676 OCFA 815.07 Dues Deduction
18677 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
18678 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
18679 Peace O15oers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 411199 to 4115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18680 Quad Knopf, Inc. 1,243.50 Professional Services-Wheeler Site Study
18681 Quality Building Supply 905.10 Landscaping Supplies
18682 Realtime Systems Corporation 8,830.00 Integration&Support Services
18683 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 269.61 Paint Supplies
18684 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 183.12 Tools
18685 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,695.05 Tools/Hardware
18686 Stanton, Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
18687 Southern California Edison 5.708.48 Power
18688 State of California 126.53 Wage Garnishment
18689 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 253.71 Mechanical Supplies
18690 Trans 1,641.08 Electrical Supplies
18691 United States Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage
18692 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
18693 Water Environment Federation 61.25 Publication
18694 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 326.13 Valves
18695 Blake Anderson 200.76 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18696 Layne T.Baroldi 249.12 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18697 Patrick B.Miles 651.84 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18698 Michael D. Moore 113.01 Meeting Expense Reimb.
16699 Edward M.Torres 326.69 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18700 Voided Check - -
18701 RPI/Blo Gro 62,937.09 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-96
18702 BRSC(BloSolids Recyclers of So.Cal) 25,000.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Management
18703 Bristol Systems,Inc. 54,558.75 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
18704 Brown&Caldwell 110.956.07 Engineering Services P1.37&J-35-1
18705 Carollo Engineers 132.210.16 Engineering Services J-26.4&Y2K Project
18706 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 34,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program
18707 County of Orange 45,887.00 Permit Fees
18708 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 81,378.31 3 Dell Monitors& 11 Computer Workstations
18709 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 31.859.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support
18710 James Martin&Co. 115,402.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project
18711 Kemkon Pacific, Inc. 96,412.84 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
18712 Lee&Ro, Inc. 33,576.86 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
18713 Padficare of Ca. 37,284.26 Health Insurance Premium
18714 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 165.599.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
18715 Pinkerton Systems Integration 62,886.06 Security Card Reader System
18716 Southern California Edison 45,265.54 Power
18717 SPEC Services, Inc. 89,148.12 Engineering Services J-33-1
18718 Technology Integration Group 64,525.01 Computer Supplies
Page 2 of 9 a'
Claims Paid From 411199 to 4/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18719 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 99,332.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
18720 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 63,507.60 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
18721 Airpol Construction, Inc. 26,316.93 Construction Pi-51R
18722 KPRS Construction Company 91,711.80 Construction 132-65
18723 Margate Construction, Inc. 60,150.00 Construction P1-36-2
18724 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 15.200.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
18725 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1.25 Long Distance Telephone Services
18726 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 10.86 Long Distance Telephone Services
18727 A.M.Best Company, Inc. 88.95 Subscription
18728 AccuStandard, Inc. 342.30 Lab Supplies
18729 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Electrical Supplies
18730 Aidco Systems, Inc. 22.385.00 Electrical Supplies
18731 Airborne Express 37.25 Air Freight
18732 Airgas Lyons Safety 857.12 Safety Supplies
18733 Alaska Sea Grant Program 35.00 Publication
18734 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 309.68 Mechanical Supplies
18735 Alltech Associates 131.69 Lab Supplies
18736 Ponton Industries 236.61 Cable
18737 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 495.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
18738 Appleone Employment Service 3,903.25 Temporary Employment Services
18739 Argent Communications Group 379.50 Subscription
18740 Arizona Instrument-Jerome Division 660AS Instrument Supplies
18741 Asbury Environmental Services 274.00 Waste Oil Removal
18742 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 137.96 Publication
18743 ABB Industrial Systems, Inc. 4,872.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies
18744 API Fund For Payroll Education, Inc. 715.00 Training Program
15745 AWSI 226.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
18746 Bailey,Fisher&Porter Company 752.32 Electrical Supplies
18747 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 3,924.43 Telephone Installation
18748 Battelle-Northwest 50.55 Meeting Expense
18749 Battery Specialties 682.45 Batteries
18750 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 343.80 Lab Supplies
18751 Boutwell&Ennor, L.L.P. 62.50 Legal Services 401a Plan
18752 Brinkman Instruments, Inc. 1,956.11 Lab Supplies
18753 Brinton-Merati Economics, Inc. 2,543.75 Legal Services-Cartel
18754 Business Education Services 195.00 Registration
18755 Buy.COm 22.61 Computer Supplies
18756 BNI Building News 87.51 Publication
18757 Calif Centrifugal Pump 3,260.37 Pump Supplies
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 4/1199 to 4115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18758 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 8,965.00 Engineering Services J40-1
18759 Cad R. Nelson, P.E. 3,140.00 Engineering Consultant
18760 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 446.00 Engineering Services Pt-63
18761 Centrepoinle Commercial Interiors 883.13 Office Furniture
18762 City of Costa Mesa 450.00 Service Contract-Gisler Road Repair
18763 Clean Source 144.39 Janitorial Supplies
18764 Compass Publications 25.50 Publication
18765 Compuserve Incorporated 29.90 Computer Services
18766 Computers America, Inc. 1,381.36 Computer Supplies
18767 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 2.867.93 Electrical Supplies
18768 Converse Consultants 10,866.10 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
18769 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9,485,53 Engine Supplies
18770 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
18771 Corporate Express 2,362.90 Office Supplies
18772 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 6,426.21 Computer Software to be used for Plant Automation/Reinvention Project#J42
18773 Cost Containment Solutions 601.65 Worker's Comp.Services
18774 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.701.55 Electrical Supplies
18775 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
18778 Cylec Industries 7,992.84 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18
18777 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 768.01 Lab Supplies
18778 CWFA Annual Conference 132.00 Conference Registration
18779 Daily Pilot 43.75 Notices&Ads
18780 Datavault 101.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage
18781 David's Tree Service 7,260.00 Tree Removal
18782 De Guelle&Sons Glass Co. 232.41 Safety Glass
18783 Dee Jaspers&Assoc. 11.798.98 Legal Services-Cartel
18784 DeZurik C/O Misco/SoulhWest 2,735.44 Valves
18785 Diamond H Recognition 739.50 Employee Service Awards
18786 Dover Elevator Company 3,738.30 Elevator Maintenance
18787 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 209.84 Paint Supplies
18788 Eberhard Equipment 1,018.60 Tractor Repair
18789 ECOS 80.00 Subscription
18790 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
18791 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,563.68 Professional Services-Legislative
18792 Engineering Sales Service 1,112.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18793 Faxpress,Inc. 414.24 Office Supplies
18794 FedEx Corporation 334.18 Air Freight
18795 Fibertron 928.26 Fiber Optic Cable
18796 Fine Science Tools, Inc. 234.69 Tools
Page 4 of 9 a
Claims Paid From 4/1199 to 4115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18797 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 304.47 Lab Supplies
18798 Flo-Systems, Inc. 11,938.21 Pump Supplies
18799 Forestry Suppliers 854.82 Lab Supplies
18800 Fountain Valley Camera 152.66 Photo Supplies
18801 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 219.00 Truck Wash Tickets
18802 Franklin Covey 84.90 Office Supplies
18803 Frazee Paint and Wallcovedng 118.53 Paint Supplies
18804 Fred Pryor Seminars 390.00 Training Registration
18805 Fry's Electronics 1,080.51 Computer Supplies
18806 Garrad-Callahan Company 215.50 Chemicals
18807 Gartner Group, Inc. 1,395.00 Conference Registration
18808 GTE Califomia 8,087.06 Telephone Services
18809 Gibson,Dunn&Crutcher, L.L.P. 318.75 Legal Services
18810 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,357.80 Pump Supplies
18811 Goveming 15.00 Subscription
18812 NNV Grainger, Inc. 1,717.15 Compressor Supplies
18813 Great American Printing Co. 700.28 Printing Service
18814 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 64.00 Janitorial Supplies
18815 GS Edwards A Div.of GS Bldg.Systems 1,386.83 Safety Supplies
18816 GTE Hawaii 217.02 Telephone Service-Conference Call
18817 Haaker Equipment Company 1,568.15 Truck Supplies
18818 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 69.60 Plumbing Supplies
18819 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 142.05 Catering Services
18820 Hewlett-Packard 112.10 Lab Supplies
18821 Hilti 183.24 Tools
18822 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, L.L.C. 5,270.00 Consulting Services-Office Support Study
18823 Home Depot 448.29 Small Hardware
18824 Idexx 4.935.60 Lab Supplies
18825 Imaging Plus, Inc. 835.57 Office Supplies
18826 Industrial Air Compressor 490.36 Mechanical Parts& Supplies
18827 StateNet 165.00 Online Service
18828 Intergraph Corporation 4,014.78 Software
18829 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract
18830 ICOM America, Inc. 95.25 Lab Supplies
18831 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 1,513.05 Safety Supplies
18832 ISLUA 545.00 Registration
18833 J&B Auto Parts 353.76 Auto Parts&Supplies
18834 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 132.23 Instrument Supplies
18835 J.D. Edwards Word Solutions Company 6,490.00 Training Expenses
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18836 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 21,797.26 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
18837 Jays Catering 583.01 Catering Services
18838 Jensen Instruments Co. 640.77 Instrument Supplies
18839 Johnson Power Ltd. 347.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
18840 Johnstone Supply 87.37 Electrical Supplies
18841 JD Edwards Southern CA Users Group 150.00 Membership
18842 Kahl Scientific Instruments 238.66 Lab Supplies
18843 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,287.24 Medical Insurance Premium
18844 Knox Industrial Supplies 607A8 Tools
18845 KADY International 2,500.00 Electrical Equipment Rental
18846 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 170.01 Safety Supplies
18847 Lab Support 2,700.00 Temporary Employment Services
18848 Leadership Directories, Inc. 1,323.00 Subscription
18849 League Of California Cities 40.00 Registration
18850 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,639.07 Architectural Services
18851 LHI 100.00 Computer Software Registration-LOphtCreck
18852 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,644.10 Mechanical Supplies
18853 Mc Junkin Corr-Ontario Branch 230A2 Plumbing Supplies
18854 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,320.76 Tools
18855 Mc Welco Rack-N-Box Company 631.09 Auto Parts&Supplies
18856 Mellon Trust 15,976.76 Investment Custodian Bank
18857 Microcal Software, Inc. 910.00 Computer Software
18858 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 14,408.20 Mechanical Repairs
18859 Milltronics, Inc. 75.84 Electrical Supplies
18860 Mission Uniform Service 3,488.97 Uniform Rentals
18861 Mitchell Instrument Co. 168.00 Instruments
18862 Monitor Labs, Inc. 114.16 Instrument Maint.
18863 MPS Photographic Services 64.12 Photographic Services
18864 NatWest Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
18865 National Fire Protection Association 1,522.95 Subscription
18866 National Institute of Bids&Technolgy 676.00 Lab Supplies
18867 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
18868 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 1,785.00 Registration
18869 Neal Supply Co. 628.82 Plumbing Supplies
18870 Network Solutions Group 680.00 Professional Service-Voice/Data Communication
18871 New Hermes, Inc. 159.10 Tools
18872 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 349.00 Registration
18873 Newport Wave, Inc. 116.67 Software
18874 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12,613.66 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
Page 6 of 9 a
Claims Paid From 4/11/99 to 4/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18875 Ninyo&Moore 699.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
18876 Office Depot Business Services Div. 749.61 Office Supplies
18877 Orange County Sanitation District 22,806.45 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
18878 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 180.80 Plumbing Supplies
18879 Oxygen Service Company 889.99 Specialty Gases
18880 OCB Reprographics 3.716.86 Printing Service-Spec P-173
18881 OI Analytical 121.29 Lab Supplies
18882 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 52.50 Electrical Supplies
18883 Pacific Bell 37.25 Telephone Services
18884 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Registration
18885 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,585.61 Plumbing Supplies
18886 Padre Janitorial Supplies 37.17 Janitorial Supplies
18887 Parts Unlimited 219.16 Truck Supplies
18888 Patriot Video Productions 626.66 Video Taping Services
18889 Peerless Pump Company 81.37 Training Supplies
18890 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 296.55 Lab Supplies
18891 Polydyne, Inc. 11,907.53 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
18892 Port Supply 47.23 Lab Supplies
18893 Presidium, Inc. 2.083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin.
18894 Print Management Group, Inc. 1,521A3 Printing Services
18895 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 770.61 Instrument Supplies
18896 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
18897 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,324.22 Trash Removal
18898 Remedy Temp 2,450.72 Temporary Employment Services
18899 Rosemount/Unit= 103.71 Instrument Supplies
18900 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 3.750.00 Engineering Services
18901 Schwing America, Inc. 1,680.04 Pump Supplies
18902 Seagate Software 1.933.69 Software
18903 Seagate Software 850.00 Registration
18904 Sears Industrial Sales 170.89 Mechanical Supplies
18905 Second-Sun 794.00 Light Fixtures
18906 Sensorex 137.97 Electrical Supplies
18907 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 852.21 Tools
18908 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,325.80 Tools/Harcimm
18909 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
18910 Supelco, Inc. 430.21 Lab Supplies
18911 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 176.40 Plumbing Supplies
18912 So. Cal.Gas Company 4,431.18 Natural Gas
18913 Soco-Lynch Corp. 261.70 Janitorial Services
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 411199 to 4115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18914 Softchoice 829.68 Software
18915 Southern California Edison 364.82 Electrical Service
18916 Southern California Trans Service 57.08 Publication
18917 Sparkletis 2,020.79 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
18918 State Board Of Equalization 476.30 Underground Fuel Storage Fee
18919 StudioVisia 2,950.00 Computer Consulting Services
18920 Summit Steel 354.10 Metal
18921 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,516.69 Mechanical Supplies
18922 Super Chem Corporation 905.10 Chemicals
18923 Swains Electric Motor Service 2,233.31 Pump
18924 Syscom, Inc. 2.756.00 On-Site Training
18925 The Register 2,25720 Notices&Ads
18926 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 654.22 Lab Supplies
18927 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,398.80 Mechanical Supplies
18928 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
18929 Trade Service Corporation 2.218.10 Electrical Supplies
18930 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 654.40 Truck Supplies
18931 Tmesdail Laboratories, Inc. 120.00 Lab Services
18932 Teksystems 4.506.00 Temporary Employment Services
18933 U.S. Filter Corporation 1.252.75 Filters
18934 The Unisource Corporation 241.11 Office Supplies
18935 United Parcel Service 259.70 Parcel Services
18936 United Rental 710.78 Forklift Rental
18937 Valley Cities Supply Company 408.33 Plumbing Supplies
18938 Vortex Industries. Inc. 985.29 Door Repair
18939 VWR Scientific 3,303.54 Lab Supplies
18940 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,041.52 Security Guards
18941 Waste News 24.00 Subscription
18942 Water Environment Research Foundation 13.30 Publication
18943 WateReuse Association 2,000.00 Membership
18944 Wayne Electric Co. 408.30 Electrical Supplies
18945 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 144.08 Electrical Supplies
18946 Western States Chemical,Inc. 6,881.05 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
18947 Western Wholesale 658.95 Tools
18948 Xerox Corporation 10,382.11 Copier Leases
18949 Xetex Incorporated 1,890.24 Lab Supplies
18950 6th National Watershed Conf. 210.00 Registration
18951 Systems Integrated 5,950.95 Construction Services J-31.3
18952 Veme's Plumbing 225.00 Plumbing Supplies
Page 8of9 a -
Claims Paid From 411199 to 4116/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18953 Layne T. Baroldi 113.01 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18954 Bradley H. Cagle 250.00 Meeting Expense
18955 Norman Eckenrode 300.00 Meeting Expense
18956 Robert P.Ghirelli 180.61 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18957 Mark Leyes 300.00 Meeting Expense
18958 Peer A. Swan 300.00 Meeting Expense
18959 Mark A.Tomko 151.15 Training Expenses Reimb.
18960 Michael D.White 250.00 Meeting Expense
18961 Compu Master 199.00 Registration
18962 Bruce Chapman and Compuxpress 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program
18963 BNI Building News 960.00 Publication
18964 County of Orange 120.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
18965 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 1.750.00 Registration
18966 Kelly Christensen and Dell Computer Corp. 1,398.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
18967 Orange County Sanitation District 880.97 Petty Cash Reimb.
18968 Quest Focus 99 Registration 3,600.00 Registration
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,746,477.52
Payroll Disbursements
13519-13657 Employee Paychecks $ 18002.13 Biweekly Payroll 4f1/99
13658-13662 Employee Paychecks 52,576.87 Termination
13663-13685 Directors'Paychecks 6,834.96 Payroll 4/9/99
36424-36863 Direct Deposit Statements 608.208.25 Biweekly Payroll 4/7/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 848,122.21
Wire Transfer Payments
ChasefTexas Commerce Bank 153.466.47 April Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Chaserrexas Commerce Bank 198.397.82 April Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank 8,Trust 163,325.86 April Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 515,190.15
Total Claims Paid 4N/99-411 6199 $ 4.108.789.88
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 4/16/99 to 4130/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
18969 Abesco $ 69.87 Hardware
18970 AGFA Upgrade Service 15.00 Freight
18971 CWEA-Membership 90.00 Membership
18972 CASA 145.00 Conference Registration
18973 CWFA Annual Conference 220.00 Conference Registration
18974 GTE California 412.44 Telephone Services
18975 Irvine Ranch Water District 28.74 Water Use
18976 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 902.89 Safety Supplies
18977 McMaster-Gaff Supply Co. 1,429.98 Tools
18978 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 208.02 Fittings
18979 Pacific Bell 53.40 Telephone Services
18980 Printers Parts 18.71 Office Supplies
18981 Road Works, Inc. 97.50 Registration
18982 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 156.23 Paint Supplies
18983 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1.527.23 Tools
18984 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.165.70 Tools/Hardwere
18985 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,629.99 Natural Gas
18986 Summit Steel 92.02 Metal
18987 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 17.54 Mechanical Supplies
18988 Union Bank of California 4,083.96 Banking Services
18989 West Marine/E&B Discount Marine 308.16 Communication Equipment
18990 Xerox Corporation 161.63 Copier Leases
18991 Simon L.Watson 246.58 Meeting Expense Reimb.
18992 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,550.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09
18993 Orange County Sanitation District 392,035.40 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
18994 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
18995 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
18996 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
18997 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
18998 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
18999 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
19000 Internal Revenue Service 48.45 Wage Garnishment
19001 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
19002 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
19003 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
19004 OCEA 615.07 Dues Deduction
19005 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
19006 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment
19007 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 9 e
Claims Paid From 4116/99 to 4130/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19008 Stale of California 122.49 Wage Garnishment
19009 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
19010 Voided Check - -
19011 Voided Check - -
19012 Voided Check - -
19013 Voided Check - -
19014 Voided Check - -
19015 Voided Check - -
19016 Allied Systems/Supply Co. 52,125.48 Plumbing Equipment
19017 Delta Dental 37,740.60 Dental Insurance Plan
19018 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 131,841.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98
19019 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing, L.L.C. 54,325AS Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
19020 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 46,481.15 Professional Services J40-4
19021 James Martin&Co. 122,787.50 Professional Services-Data Integration Project
19022 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 45,129.89 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
19023 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 34,422.95 Engineering Services J-62
19024 Network Catalyst, Inc. 68.477.63 Computer Supplies
19025 Orange County Water District 56,269.13 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
19026 Pinkerton Systems Integration 44,999.29 Security Card Reader System
19027 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 76,098.46 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
19028 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 36,273.77 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
19029 Western States Chemical, Inc. 37,817.90 Caustic Soda MO B-23-95
19030 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 64,366.17 Legal Services MO 7.26-95
19031 Airpol Construction, Inc. 49,490.45 Construction PI-51R
19032 Mike Pdich&Sons 92,066.00 Construction 6.12
19033 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 70,534.82 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
19034 Sancan Engineering, Inc. 80,100.00 Construction 2-34R
19035 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 1,047,797.67 Construction 7-7-1 &P2-35-3
19036 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 4.880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
19037 A&R Telecom 8,911.03 Communication Equipment
19038 A Biederman, Inc. 798.27 Instrument Maint.
19039 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 7.29 Long Distance Telephone Services
19040 Abesco 2.93 Hardware
19041 Acoustical Material Services 87.00 Ceiling Tile
19042 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.952.60 Engine Testing J-19
19043 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 3.503.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
19044 Aidco Systems, Inc. 11,716.19 Electrical Supplies
19045 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
19046 Airborne Express 12.25 Air Freight
19047 American Airlines 8,480.41 Travel Services
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid Prom 4116199 to 4I30199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19048 American Society of Safety Engineering 217AO Publication
19049 American Training Resources, Inc. 808.13 Training Materials
19050 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
19051 Appleone Employment Service 6,072A5 Temporary Employment Services
19052 Applied Industrial Technology 34.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies
19053 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,053.00 Vacuum Truck Services
19054 Auerbach 15.11 Publication
19055 ABM Business Machines, Inc. 139.90 Once Equipment Maint.
19056 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 20,000.00 Professional Services-Flow Monitoring Project
19057 Assoc.of Metro. Sewerage Agencies 1.100.00 Registration
19058 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 436.72 Long Distance Telephone Services
19059 AT&T Wireless Service 1,827.69 Cellular Telephone Service
19060 L.A. Cellular Telephone Company 21SA8 Cellular Telephone Service
19061 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 1.892.74 Electrical Supplies
19062 Battelle 250.00 Registration
19063 Battery Specialties 1,706.37 Batteries
19064 Bearings&Drives, Inc. 803.82 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
19065 BearCom 2,815.81 Communication Equipment
19066 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 141.18 Lab Services
19067 Body Pros 2,635.50 Vehicle Body Repair
19068 Boot Barn 274.54 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
19069 Bristol Systems, Inc. 16.071.25 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
19070 Burke Engineering Co. 582.69 Electrical Supplies
19071 Business Education Services 195.00 Legal Services
19072 Business Publishers,Inc. 347.00 Subscription
19073 Buy.Com 84.35 Computer Supplies
19074 Cal-Pac Chemical Co, Inc. 169.61 Chemicals
19075 Calif Centrifugal Pump 910.00 Pump Supplies
19076 Calif Energy Commission Publications 30.00 Publication
19077 California Automatic Gate 973.80 Service Agreement
19078 Career Track Seminars MS2 99.00 Seminar Registration
19079 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator
19080 Camilo Engineers 23,079.03 Engineering Services-P1-36-2
19081 Charles P. Crowley Co. 114.39 Instrument Parts
19082 City Office Furniture, Inc. 3,409.50 Office Supplies
19083 Clayton Group Services, Inc, 2,357.50 Professional Services-Ergonomic
19084 Coastal Video Communications Corp. 1,289.62 Training Software
19086 Computers America, Inc. 123.92 Computer Supplies
19086 Connell GM Parts 130.83 Truck Supplies
19087 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 3,914.94 Electrical Supplies
Page 3 of 9 0
Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19088 Consolidated Plaslics Company 1,783.55 Lab Supplies
19089 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1.184.76 Engine Supplies
19090 Corporate Express Imaging 2,132.97 Misc.Computer Supplies
19091 Corporate Express 1.527.13 Office Supplies
19092 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09
19093 Cotelligent 1.115.63 Professional Services-Computer
19094 County of Orange 1,695.90 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
19095 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.565.20 Electrical Supplies
19096 Cummins Cal Pacific 8.00 Publication
19097 Cytec Industries 14,734.00 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18
19098 California Assoc.of Sanitation Agencies 10,000.00 Membership
19099 CHMIA 450.00 Registration
19100 David's Tree Service 10,050.00 Tree Removal
19101 Dee Jasper and Associates 938.00 Legal Services-Cartel
19102 Dell Computer 14,040.26 1 Latitude Notebook Computer,8 Backup Tapes 8 Networking Peripheral Set
19103 De2urik C/O Misco/SouthWest 6,904.62 Valves
19104 DR DAS 105.00 Electrical Maint.
19105 Marcus D.Dubois 150.00 Training Expense
19106 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 661.37 Paint Supplies
19107 DGA Consultants, Inc. 12,340.97 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
19108 DME, Inc. 2,214.26 Compressor Parts
19109 DWG Associates 7,025.37 Professional Services-Oxygen Generation
19110 E.Courtney Anderson 536.60 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour
19111 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 2,045.00 Medical Screening
19112 Enchanter, Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
19113 Environmental Data Solutions Grps, L.L.0 7,680.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info. Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project
19114 Environmental Express 956.62 Lab Supplies
19116 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,148.60 Lab Services
19116 Eric Joyce 498.66 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour
19117 Expo Power Systems, Inc. 26.94 Publication
19118 Faxpress,Inc. 590.47 Office Supplies
19119 FedEx Corporation 154.54 Air Freight
19120 Filter Supply Company 334.87 Filters
19121 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 939.76 Lab Supplies
19122 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 129.00 Concrete Cutting
19123 Flo-Systems, Inc. 535.91 Pump Supplies
19124 Forestry Suppliers $2.00 Lab Supplies
19125 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,132.84 Long Tenn Disability Ins. Premium
19126 Fountain Valley Camera 12.37 Photo Supplies
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 4/16/99 to 4130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19127 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 405.81 Paint Supplies
19128 Voided Check - -
19129 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 458.69 Paint Supplies
19130 Fry's Electronics 416.70 Computer Supplies
19131 General Electric Supply Company 80.81 Electdc Parts
19132 Ganahl Lumber Company 3,280.77 Lumber/Hardware
19133 Garratt-Callahan Company 4,000.76 Chemicals
19134 GTE California 807.62 Telephone Services
19135 George T. Hall 4.800.24 Valve Assembly
19136 George Yardley Co. 235.04 Lab Supplies
19137 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
19138 Gopher Electronics Company 119.90 Electrical Supplies
19139 Graham Brothers 12,612.00 Construction Services-Lab Air Duct Work
19140 Graseby S.T.I. 228.92 Engine Supplies
19141 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 374.32 Janitorial Supplies
19142 Haaker Equipment Company 2.385.32 Truck Supplies
19143 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 489.66 Plumbing Supplies
19144 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 45.00 Catering Services
19145 Hilli,Inc. 59.27 Tools
19146 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 183.35 Compressor Parts
19147 The Holman Group 718.52 Employee Assistance Program Premium
19148 Home Depot 576.25 Small Hardware
19149 Hub Auto Supply 57.74 Truck Parts
19150 City of Huntington Beach 24.97 Water Use
19151 HOW Design Conference 670.00 Registration
19152 Industrial Air Compressor 2,900.55 Equipment Rental
19153 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 88.18 Truck Supplies
19154 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 296.25 Lab Supplies
19155 Irvine Ranch Water District 39.28 Water Use
19156 Isco Go FLW, Inc. 209.72 Lab Supplies
19157 Airgas Direct Ind-IPCO Safety Div. 153.08 Safety Supplies
19158 Jitney Company, Inc. 7.780.78 Communication Equipment
19159 Johnstone Supply 98.96 Electrical Supplies
19160 FormsTronicsRichards Capital Corporation 682.05 Business Forms-Checks
19161 KP.Lindstrom 12,375.52 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
19162 Lab Support 4.550.63 Temporary Employment Services
19163 Labconco 98.94 Lab Supplies
19164 LaserAll Corporation 787.89 Service Agreement
19165 Law Journal Press 6.78 Publication
19166 Law/Crandall 180.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4/30199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19167 Leadership Companies, Inc. 6,993.20 Software
19168 Leadership Directories 468.35 Subscription
19169 Legal Arts Multimedia, L.L.C. 6,757.00 Legal Services-Cartel
19170 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 300.32 Galvanize Beams @ Barscreen
19171 LAPA 95.00 Los Angeles Power Association Membership
19172 Voided Check -
19173 Maintenance Products, Inc. 1.734.78 Mechanical Supplies
19174 Mar Vac Electronics 86.99 Instrument Supplies
19175 Marcy Rothenberg 600,00 Professional Services-Copywriter for the Internet Project
19176 MasTec Network Services 11,480.17 Communication Service
19177 Mc Junkin Corporation 619.14 Plumbing Supplies
19178 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 978.03 Tools
19179 Medlin Controls Co. 1.470.97 Instrument Supplies
19180 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 6.356.18 Mechanical Repairs
19181 Mission Abrasive Supplies 60.30 Tools 8 Supplies
19182 Mission Uniform Service 3,257.88 Uniform Rentals
19183 Mitchell Instrument Co. 4,045.00 Instruments
19184 Motion Industries 266.70 Pump Supplies
19185 Municipal Maintenance Equipment 720.53 Auto Parts 8 Supplies
19186 MGE UPS System 75.00 Publication
19187 MPS Photographic Services 33.95 Photographic Services
19188 National Fire Protection Association 519.19 Publication
19189 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2,375.00 Registration
19190 Neal Supply Co. 875.21 Plumbing Supplies
19191 Nelson Garda 296.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Tour
19192 Nelson Marketing 333.15 Tools
19193 Network Construction Services 7,769.06 Conslruc0on Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project
19194 NetManage, Inc. 4,040.63 AS/400 Software Maim.
19195 Newark Electronics 641.92 Instrument Supplies
19196 City of Newport Beach 28.74 Water Use
19197 Nexlel Communications 661.71 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time
19198 Nicholas Chevrolet 35.80 Truck Repairs
19199 Nidkey Petroleum Co., Inc. 7.666.49 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
19200 Ninyo 8 Moore 1.172.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
19201 The Norco Companies 119.00 Mail Delivery Service
19202 NAB Associates, Inc. 905.00 Lab Services
19203 Network Solutions Group 7,900.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade
19204 Occupational Vision Services 109.84 Safety Glasses
19205 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,597.64 Office Supplies
19206 Olsson Construction, Inc. 10,880.00 Construction P2-55
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 4116M to 4130199
Warrant No. Vendor Amoam Description
19207 Oracle 1.818.00 Registration
19208 Orange County Overhead Door 209.30 Door Repair
19209 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 859.00 Electrical Supplies
19210 Oxygen Service Company 2.167.19 Specialty Gases
19211 OCB Reprographics 5,769.01 Printing Service-Spec P-173
19212 OCCABA 45.00 Orange County Compensation and Benefits Assoc. Membership
19213 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 106.28 Electrical Supplies
19214 Pacific Bell 1,133.26 Telephone Services
19215 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Service
19216 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,295.40 Plumbing Supplies
19217 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 7,045.41 Mechanical Supplies
19218 Pagenet 1,982.10 Rental Equipment
19219 Pervo Paint Co 1a3.61 Paint Supplies
19220 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 13,011.60 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
19221 Pitney Bowes 365.94 Postage Machine Service Agreement
19222 Polydyne, Inc. 21.459.79 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
19223 Power Distributors, Inc. 6,750.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation
19224 Pulsafeeder Inc 504.37 Pump Supplies
19225 Pyramid Fence Company, Inc. 366.00 Fencing Installation
19226 PGC Scienlifics 143.40 Lab Supplies
19227 Regents of University of Calif. 290.00 Registration
19228 Reliastar 17,924.53 Employee Medcal Health Premium
19229 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.041.16 Life Insurance Premium
19230 Remedy Temp 4,961.52 Temporary Employment Services
19231 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 875.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents
19232 RPM Electric Motors 1,618.76 Electric Motor Repair
19233 Laidlaw Environmental Services 13.530.00 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement
19234 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 1,850.00 Sewer Repair
19235 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 758.68 Mechanical Supplies
19236 Sartorius Corporation 85.00 Lab Equipment Service
19237 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 154.71 Specialty Gases
19238 City of Seal Beach 75.99 Water Use
19239 Sears Industrial Sales 1,524.03 Mechanical Supplies
19240 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 9,304AS Professional Services-Ocean Oulfall Instrumentation
19241 Second-Sun 422.95 Light Fixtures
19242 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,049.04 Tools
19243 Shumiuck Sales&Engineering 962.01 Tools/Hardware
19244 Stemon,Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
19245 SoftChoice 6,359.41 Software
19246 Sonic Systems,Inc. 22.899.71 8 Process Computer Workstations
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 4116199 to 4/30199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19247 Southern California Air Cord. Dist. 197.90 Electrical Supplies
19248 Southern California Edison 5,384.12 Power
19249 Sprint 32.70 Long Distance Telephone Service
19250 Standard Supply& Equipment Co., Inc. 55.20 Pump Supplies
19251 Starting Art 140.02 Art Supplies
19252 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 445.18 Office Supplies
19253 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals
19254 SludioVisia 2,610.00 Computer Consulting Services
19255 Summit Steel 2,734.49 Metal
19266 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
19257 Suncor Marine& Industrial 43.25 Lab Supplies
19258 Sunset Ford 59.51 Truck Supplies
19259 Sunset Industrial Parts 140.29 Mechanical Supplies
19260 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies
19261 SCCWRP 14.00 Registration
19282 Robert J.Thiede 150.00 Training Expense
19263 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 389.41 Mechanical Supplies
19264 Time Motion Tools 256.63 Tools
19265 Tony's Lode&Safe Service&Sales 145.41 Locks&Keys
19266 Tran Consulting Engineers 8,612.50 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects
19267 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 259.59 Truck Supplies
19268 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 68.33 Truck Supplies
19269 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 338.00 Lab Services
19270 TCH Associates, Inc. 268.82 Lab Supplies
19271 Teksystems 8,915.00 Temporary Employment Services
19272 Ultra Scientific 920.35 Lab Supplies
19273 The Unisource Corporation 982.48 Office Supplies
19274 United Parcel Service 878.03 Parcel Services
19275 Unocal Corporation 74.17 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
19276 UCT 250.00 Registration
19277 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,373.25 Engineering Services-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
19278 Valley Cities Supply Company 138.78 Plumbing Supplies
19279 Valley Detroit Diesel Milton 191.59 Electrical Supplies
19280 Vision Service Plan{CA) 7,624.58 Vision Service Premium
19281 VWR Scientific 10,891.22 Lab Supplies
19282 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,523.84 Security Guards
19283 Water Environment Federation 1.435.00 Software
19284 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 42.67 Electrical Supplies
19285 Westrux International 63.44 Truck Supplies
19286 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 203.46 Valves
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 4/16/99 to 4/30199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
19287 Wyatt Data Services 538.00 Publications
19288 Xerox Corporation 4.721.29 Copier Leases
19289 Xircom 404.06 Computer Supplies
19290 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 7.903.80 Construction 5.41-1
19291 CNA Trust 878.20 Construction 541-1
19292 Pave West 17,687.90 Construction P1 40-3
10293 Veme's Plumbing 3,696.00 Plumbing Supplies
19294 Shabblr S. Basrai 619.D4 Training&Meeting Expense Reimb.
19295 Michael J. Chester 449.95 Meeting Expense Reimb.
19296 Darrell S. Ennis 250.00 Meeting Expense
19297 Jeffrey A. Esber 315.90 Meeting Expense Reimb.
19298 Danny S. Evangelista 250.00 Training Expense
10299 Norbert Gala 1,097.25 Training Expense Reimb.
19300 Rick J. Hannappel 556.40 Training Expense Reimb.
19301 Michelle R. Hetherington 416.21 Training Expense Reimb.
19302 Lawrence P. Kraemer 496.27 Training Expense Reimb.
19303 Charles G. Lee 990.46 Meeting Expense Reimb.
19304 Robert J.Thiede 250.00 Training Expense Reimb.
19305 Lisa L.Tomko 155.00 Training Expense Reimb.
19306 Orange County Sanitation District 849.62 Petty Cash Reimb.
19307 County of Orange 870.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
19308 Reliastar 7,936.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
19309 City of Irvine 2,429.44 Permit Fee 7-27
19310 JLM General Contracting& Environ. Svcs. 15,998.40 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair
19311 JLM General Contracting &Environ. Svcs, 4,507.10 Construction Service-Street&Pipe Repair
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,421,821A8
Wire Transfer Payments
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. $ 83,114.16 Quarterly Liquidity on Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 83.114.16
Payroll Disbursements
13686-13822 Employee Paychecks $ 179,826.93 Biweekly Payroll 4121199
13823-13824 Employee Paychecks 39,353.64 Termination
36864-37305 Direct Deposit Statements 634.695.52 Biweekly Payroll 4/7/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 853,876.09
Total Claims Paid 4116/99-4130/99 $ 4,358,811.73
Page 9 of 9
r
BOARD OF DIRECTORS McWng Date To ad.of Dir.
05/R6/99
AGENDA REPORT Hem Numbe Item Numbe
9
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AND APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
PRESENT LATE CLAIM ON BEHALF OF JANARAE LEE, CLAIMANT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim filed on behalf of Janarae
Lee, and deny Application for Late Claim.
SUMMARY
On April 12, 1999, the District was served with a claim for personal injuries and an
Application for Leave to File Late Claim, presented on behalf of Janarae Lee. It is alleged
that Ms. Lee suffered a trip and fall in April 1998, at the Jolly Roger Restaurant in Dana
Point.
By letter dated April 27, 1999, General Counsel advised Claimant's attorney that the District
"...does not own, operate, maintain, or have any interest in any sewer lines in or about the
vicinity of the Jolly Roger Restaurant....or anywhere in the City of Dana Point." Additionally,
the District returned the claim on May 5, 1999, as being untimely.
As the area of the alleged accident does not incorporate the District's jurisdictional
boundaries, staff recommends denial of the Application to File Late Claim, which,
procedurally, must be separately acted upon by the District and notification given to
Claimant.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable(information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
ATTACHMENTS
Memo from General Counsel dated May 13, 1999.
ccssK ec
1NOonWa,a,Mytl,anBe^EaBaaN PpenEa Rerore\If9de W A,nd.Repa4`ASBMwn 8 d¢
R. flrJO99
y ' DRAFT
MINUJF-S OF COMBINED STEERING AND
gD HOC COMMITTEES MEETING
Wednesday, April 28, 1999
A combined meeting of the Steering and Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, April 28, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the Districts
Administrative Office,
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Don Hughes
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Ryal Wheeler
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee
Jim Silva, County Supervisor
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board STAFF PRESENT:
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Mike Moore, Manager of ECM Division
Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Pal McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Gary Streed, Director of Finance
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board
Directors Absent:
Peer Swan, Vice Chair
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the of the March 24, 1999 Combined Meeting of the Steering and Ad Hoc Committees
were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee f
Page 2
April 28, 1999
w
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) SPECIAL REPORT BY DIRECTOR SALTARELLI RE CROW WINTHROP MEETING
This report was deferred until Director Saltarelli arrived. (See below)
(7) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager McIntyre indicated that the status of SPMT negotiations would be discussed in
Closed Session.
A. Update on Kem County Issues re Biosolids Disposal
Blake Anderson and Mike Moore explained the ongoing activities associated with
the biosolids ordinance being considered by the Kem County Board of
Supervisors. Staff continues to monitor and participate as necessary.
B. The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act
Blake Anderson provided a heads up that a recent California Supreme Court
ruling has determined that state resources (civil servants) are to be allowed to
provide engineering services on state funded projects. Several bills are being
drafted that would allow the continuation of public-private partnerships, and there
is an initiative process that is underway. If the initiative is approved, it would
appear on the March 2000 ballot. Staff, at that time, would seek active support
from the Board by way of a resolution.
C. Update on California Water Bond
Mr.Anderson reported that SAWPA is building a coalition to get a water bond that
would address issues of importance to the District and other agencies in the
watershed. When the ballot measure is presented to the voters, staff will seek
support from the Board.
D. Legislators Day at the District, and E. Managing Public Outrage with Peter
Sandman
Michelle Tuchman described several events that the Directors may wish to
participate in: Legislators' Day on Friday, June 25 between 8:30 and 11:30 a.m.;
a day-long workshop with Peter Sandman on Wednesday, October 20; and a tour
of the Chino Basin and surrounding drainage area on Saturday, June 12.
Ms. Tuchman also presented concept drawings of new signage for the CNG
station that will be presented to the City of Fountain Valley for review.
After discussion, it was determined that the Committee meetings would continue
to be held in Conference Room A1B, unless there is a special event that could
result in larger than usual attendance.
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that there was a NPDES permit violation
in February that was not caught until well after the fact, and as a result EPA and the Regional
Board were not notified as required. However, once it was identified, staff immediately
notified the regulators by letter and has developed an action plan to determine where the
compound entered the influent. The new computer module of LIMS will prevent this from
occurring in the future. Procedures are being reviewed to ensure that this won't happen
again.
tl
v Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
ApH128, 1999
(8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel reported on the claim submitted by Colich Construction re the Slater Avenue Pump
Station project, Contract No. 11-17. A construction analyst will be engaged to evaluate records and
data and provide an opinion to try to resolve this issue.
(9) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D)
A. Service to Areas Outside the District's Boundary
Gary Streed provided the additional information requested at last month's Steering
Committee meeting on the existing policy. The proposed changes would allow
service for all areas within the natural drainage areas to the Sanitation District,
some outside of Orange County. The request from Brea has been incorporated
into the resolution. Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, indicated that the because
this is a policy and not an ordinance, the Board could make changes or waive
certain requirements.
It was moved, seconded and approved to forward the policy to the Board at the
May meeting.
B. Lemon Heights Annexation Agreements
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, reported on the status of the developers
request to annex property to the District and to provide a pump station to handle
flow from this 'island' in unincorporated County territory. Other homeowners have
requested that they be part of the annexation, and as a result" homeowners will
be signing agreements to annex to the District. These requests will be presented
to the Board in May. Following LAFCO approval, the Board will be asked to
approve the annexations.
(6) At 6 p.m. Director Saltarelli arrived and described his meeting with Mr. Bill Lane of Crow
Winthrop on their claim against the District regarding the Consolidation. It appears that
an agreement has been reached wherein Crow Winthrop will drop its claim and the
District will continue to work to reach agreement on the pump station relocation and
future sewering of the Park Place development. Nothing has been received in writing to
date.
(9) continued
C. Computer Loan Program for Directors
Don McIntyre explained the computer loan program currently offered to employees
and asked if there was any interest in expanding it to include Directors. After
discussion, it was decided to discuss the issue at a future FAHR Committee
meeting, after contacting the Political Fair Practices Commission on
appropriateness.
D. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to Committees in May were
reviewed.
(10) REPORT OF AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair Collins did not make a report.
►
Minutes of the Steering Committee r
Page 4
April 28, 1999
(11) AD HOC COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Seaside Financial Lease Agreement at Plant 1
The current lease agreement with Seaside Financial for the storage facility is
scheduled to terminate in September 1999. Staff recommended that the lease be
extended with the same terms until December 2001. At that time, the lease could be
extended on an agreed upon term but with a reduced area to provide space that could
be required by the GWR project. The members of the Steering Committee agreed with
the recommendation.
B. Recommend providing a Verbal Report re GWR Joint Coordination Committee at
monthly Board meetings
C. Recommend that the Board receive and file minutes of the Joint Coordination
Committee meetinas
D. Recommend that all Joint Coordination Committee recommendations requiring Board
approval be presented directly to the Board
Ad Hoc Committee Chair Collins recommended that items B., C., and D. be considered
together. It was moved, seconded and approved to accept staff recommendations.
Items of special interest and without urgency, however, will continue to be presented to
the PDC Committee, as determined by the Ad Hoc Committee Chair.
(12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
Director Collins asked that the issue of Director Compensation be considered at a future FAHR
Committee. General Counsel Woodruff indicated that changes to the compensation structure require
legislative action and that CASA is currently working on identifying a bill currently under consideration
that this could be added to. Mr. Woodruff will report back to the Committee at the next meeting on
the status.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
e
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 5
April 28, 1999
(15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May 26, 1999 at 5 p.m.
(16) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened at 6:34 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54957, to
consider the appointment of a public employee to the position of General Manager and to
consider the terms of a termination agreement. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with
the Board Secretary. The minutes of the Joint Board will report on the actions when they are
approved.
At 6:58 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
Prepared by:
Jean Tappan
Steering Committee Secretary
nm,�m.e+W.edWaa>vc�ro�.�w.ve'roe�+�ero sc w:„ew.es
STEERING COMMITTEE "eeUng Date Te28/99 ste r
AGENDA REPORT Ram Number Hem N mbe
it
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: POLICY REGARDING PROVIDING SEWER SERVICES TO AREAS
OUTSIDE OF ORANGE COUNTY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-05, re Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future Areas to
be Served by the Orange County Sanitation District, and rescind Resolution No. OCSD
98-11.
SUMMARY
The General Manager recommends that the current policy be modified or amended to
provide:
1) Service, by agreement, will be provided for properties that drain naturally to the
Orange County Sanitation District and are contiguous to the Orange County
boundary.
2) The Orange County Sanitation District member agency affected by a proposed
service agreement will be consulted before an agreement is proposed to the Board
of Directors.
3) Local sewer service must be provided by a city, a sanitary district, or a water district,
but annexation to that service provider is not required.
4) All existing contracts for service to areas outside the District boundaries will continue
to be honored.
In 1985, the Boards of Directors adopted a policy limiting the District's service area to
areas within our sphere of influence or already served by contract. This was an addition
to a long-standing policy that all areas served must be annexed to, and receive local
sewer service from, a local agency.
Many things have changed since then, including adoption of a 30-year master plan and
a heightened awareness of our role in regional watershed management issues.
As detailed in the accompanying staff report, staff now believes it is appropriate to
modify our policy.
H%»n Mganeo.m ngem.Reo WINQe M N.M.R.gwmosgwam IU. g
Ra,:sa ermn3a Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY ,
No impact. All areas to be served will pay their share of capital and operating costs.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Refer to attached staff report.
ALTERNATIVES
Retain existing policy and consider exceptions on a case-by-case basis.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff Report
2. Existing Resolution
3. Draft Revised Resolution
GGS:lc
Attachment
N 1vq.ELlapeMel�N A,...p IIM Sm.Ap .RepwO'65WLmm 11<
R. eamsA Page
r
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-XX
POLICY PERTAINING TO FUTURE AREAS TO BE SERVED BY THE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY PERTAINING
TO FUTURE AREAS TO BE SERVED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD
98-11.
. .. . .. ... ... . .
WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District provides wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal services to serve all or part of 23 cities and
unincorporated areas occupying the central and northwestern areas of Orange County,
and for certain areas outside the District boundaries pursuant to service agreements,
and,
WHEREAS, concern has been expressed to the District that if the District's
service areas were to be further expanded by annexation or service agreement, it may
impair the ability of the District to provide adequate service to areas presently within its
jurisdiction; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has been advised that the 1989 Master
Plan, the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and the
proposed 1999 Strategic Plan that call for the planning and construction of treatment
works, disposal facilities, trunk line sewers, and related appurtenances are compatible
with and can accommodate the wastewater service needs of all those areas presently
within the District's approved spheres of influence and also within the areas located
outside the existing boundaries of the District, but which are receiving service pursuant
to service agreements; and,
WHEREAS, on-site sewerage disposal systems in adjacent communities may
contribute to degradation of groundwater basins used by cities and communities within
the District's service area; and,
WHEREAS, the District's Board of Directors believes that it is in the best
interests of the communities and cities serviced by the District to assist in preserving
Orange County's valuable groundwater supplies from degradation by on-site sewage
disposal systems; and,
WHEREAS, the District has studied the impacts of allowing areas outside of
the current sphere of influence to discharge into the District's sewerage system; and,
1
Y
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has been advised that there are
approximately 12,500 acres that are outside of Orange County which would naturally
drain into the Orange County groundwater basin; and,
WHEREAS, said 12,500 acres are projected to generate less than two million
gallons per day of wastewater when fully developed; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has also determined that the master-
planned facilities for the District can also accommodate the wastewater flows from said
areas without causing any adverse impact on the areas in the vicinity of the treatment
plants or in the operations of the treatment plants and facilities themselves, and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That the District adopt, as its policy, that it will approve additional
annexations of territory, or approve a service agreement, for territory presently included
in the individual District's adopted spheres of influence or which is entitled to receive
service pursuant to existing service agreements.
Section 2: The District will provide service to territory outside the area
described in Section 1, and allow connection to the District's sewerage system to
reduce degradation of valuable groundwater in Orange County, provided the following
conditions are satisfied:
A. Water from the territory would naturally drain into Orange County.
B. The Orange County Sanitation District member agency affected by a
proposed service agreement, or the development related thereto, must be consulted,
and its input considered, prior to the proposed agreement being presented to the
Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors.
C. A local government agency executes the service agreement providing for
sewerage services and for payment of one-time fees equivalent to annexation fees,
connection fees, and an administrative charge, and annual fees equivalent to sewer
service fees, properly taxes, and an administrative charge, and any other terms and
conditions, all as established by the Board of Directors at the time of approval, or as
amended from time-to-time, for said service; and
D. The local land use, sewer, or water authority agrees to require
connections to the District or other sewage treatment systems, and discourage on-site
disposal systems.
2
i Section 3: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 26, 1999,
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
3
Y
u �
9
00
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, May 5, 1999 -5:00 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on May 5, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Others Present:
Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers
Pat McGuigan, Chair Roger Griffin
Jan Debay, BoardChair
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Staff Present:
Don Bankhead
Peter Green Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Joy Neugebauer Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Anna Piercy Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
Charles E. Sylvia Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Paul Walker Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager
James Ferryman, Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
John Collins, Past Board Chair Doug Cook, O&M Chief Operator
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
OO D 0 P.O.8or8127 0 F...1.n Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
i
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance d
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
May 5, 1999
RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the April 7, 1999 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting were approved as corrected.
Director Jan Debay abstained.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chair McGuigan gave no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not in attendance.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager gave no report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The Director of General Services Administration, Ed Hodges, reported on an agreement with the
City of Fountain Valley providing for the City to use the District's diesel and unleaded fueling
station at Plant 1 at cost plus 5% administration fees. The agreement is working so well that the
City of Fountain Valley would like to extend the term of the agreement to five years.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, briefly reported on media activity at the
District.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
The Director of Information Technology, Patrick Miles, updated the Directors on Y2K issues.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
The Director of Operations and Maintenance, Bob Ooten, reported that the wastewater flow to
the treatment plants remains low,which reduces Operations costs. He also reported that both
plants are moving closer to being fully automated. It was then suggested that the July or
September committee meeting be held at Plant 2, preceded by a tour of the facilities.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
May 5, 1999
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirelli, reported that the District's consultant has
begun to collect data through the due diligence for possible acquisition of property in Kem
County. He stated that it appears there is an abundant amount of water at the site. Further
information will be reported on at the next OMTS meeting.
Mr. Ghirelli also gave an update to the CEQA process Kem County will be going through in
developing and adopting an ordinance on the application of biosolids within Kem County.
A brief report was also given on alleged crop damage sustained by application of biosolids
performed by Pima Gro, a contractor of the District. A claim was filed against Pima Gro in the
amount of$161,000. Staff is evaluating what, if any, responsibility the District may have in the
matter.
The District discovered an NPDES permit violation in February 1999. The permit allows
1.59 parts per billion (ppb.) of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The District released
4.11 ppb. The violation was not flagged in the District's monthly monitoring report filed with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Staff subsequently discovered the violation
and immediately notified the RWQCB. Mr. Ghirelli is having staff review and revise the current
reporting process so that proper notification is given to the RWQCB immediately, as required.
The Source Control Division is also undertaking an investigation to track down the source of the
PAH discharge into the sewer system.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
DISCUSSION ITEM(S)
1. OMTS99-14: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside
Financial Corporation (Specification No. L-009-1)for lease of 18.09 acres
of land at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the
City of Fountain Valley, for one year.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
2. OMTS99-15: Approve District funding for Cooperative Projects related to inflow and
infiltration reduction totaling $2,257,656 as recommended by the
Guidance Review Committee.
Motion: A substitute motion was moved and seconded to approve the
core projects identified as Sunset Beach Slip Lining; Midway City Sanitary
District NE Sewer, Newport Beach Known Infiltration; and La Habra
Sewer Project. The motion failed by a vote of 3 to 6.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
May 5, 1999
Motion: It was then moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
Directors Don Bankhead, Peer Swan, and Paul Walker opposed.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
3. OMTS99-16: Results of Odor/Sulfide Characterization Study in the Collections System
Ed Torres, Air Quality and Special Projects Manager, gave a presentation
on the results of this study.
4. OMTS99-17: Future operational staffing levels and philosophy
Doug Cook, Operations and Maintenance Chief Operator, gave a report
on operational staffing levels.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
June 2, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m.
Submitted by:
Penny Kyle
Operations ainte ce and Technical Services
Committee Secreta
NaaonbatalPwp.dtarsenaatoMTS%19 Wien s� 99 M:nutea.dm
OMTS COMMITTEE aemngoax Tox ear
Wool�,Isas size
AGENDA REPORT Iwm Number Iem Number
12 N)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Samuel L. Mowbray, Laboratory Manager
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF YEAR 2000 NONCOMPLIANT LAB EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify the award of purchase order contracts to various vendors for purchase of Y2K
Noncompliant Lab Equipment (Specification No. E-274) in an amount not to exceed
$475,000 plus tax and freight, in accordance with Resolution No. OCSD98-21, as
follows:
- Gas Chromatograph
- ICP-Mass Spectrometer
- Combination Flame and Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometer
-Automated Mercury Analyzer
- Gas Chromatograph - Mass Spectrometer
- Biological Oxygen Demand Controller Software Upgrade
-Controller Board and Software Upgrades for Data Management System
- Controller and Software Upgrades to Segmented Flow Autoanalyzer
- Controller and Software Upgrades to Automated Identification Systems (Vitek)
- Software and Hardware Upgrades to Liquid Chromatography Systems
SUMMARY
The evaluation of laboratory systems for Year 2000 compliance determined that several
types of software and analytical instruments would not be functional in the new
millennium. A summary of the various items is attached. Because of the timing of the
Fiscal Year 99/00 budget, it was not possible to consider the equipment purchases and
other system upgrades as part of the regular budget process. Multiple vendor bids,
purchase approval and processing, installation and testing of all listed items cannot be
completed in the six month time period between July 1999 and January 1, 2000.
Furthermore, many of the items will be purchased under a sole source agreement
because of issues relating to compatibility of ancillary hardware and software with
existing equipment. This was considered an emergency item and has been approved
by the General Manager. Purchases will be made this spring and all equipment should
be received by August 1999. This will allow sufficient time for installation, required
testing and validation. Approximately 50% of the total cost is expected to be incurred in
Fiscal Year 9a/99.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not Applicable
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The software upgrades and hardware/instrument replacements were identified during
the evaluation phase of the Y2K project. They have been reviewed and approved by
the District Y2K consultant.
Until a formal bid is received from each equipment vendor an exact cost cannot be
determined. However, based on informal quotes, it is estimated that the total of all
equipment and software will be $350,000 to $475,000. The variance is due primarily to
uncertainties in the trade-in value of existing equipment. The necessary funds will be
transferred from other Fiscal Year 98199 capital accounts into the Y2K account. A list
of equipment and software is attached.
This agenda report serves as notification of the use of the General Manager's
Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution 98-21.
ALTERNATIVES
Not Applicable
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
List of equipment, software and the projects impacted.
SLM:pIj
H 1rq.NaVBenEa\euN A,.d.Repi611B33 Buis n6eMa Pe�unN59dry.m 13 Ne
R—..e 10 7 Page 2
SUBJECT: Purchase of Year 2000 Noncompliant Lab Equipment— Information
Item
OMTS Information Item
April 7, 1999
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
Test Instrument Age of Estimated`
Existing Cost - '�
_--
Instrument
Volatile Organic Gas Chromatograph 6 years $80,000
Contaminants - Wastewater
and Industrial Samples
Trace Metals—Low ICP- Mass Spectrometer 7 years $196,000
Detection Limits in Marine
Sediments and Wastewater
Samples
Trace Metals— Normal Combination Flame and 10 years $65,000
Detection Limits in Graphite Furnace Atomic
Wastewater and Industrial Absorption Spectrometer
Samples
Mercury in Wastewater, Automated Mercury 6 years $30,000
Industrial Samples and Analyzer
Marine Sediments
Pesticides, PCBs and Gas Chromatograph— 7 years $90,000
Organic Contaminants in Mass Spectrometer
Wastewater, Industrial and
Marine Sediment Samples
SOFTWARE AND CONTROLLER UPGRADES FOR EXISTING EQUIPMENT
est
Biological Oxygen Demand cUpgrade of Controller $2,000
BOD Software
Volatile Organic Controller Board and $2.250
Contaminants in Software Upgrades for Data
Wastewater and Industrial Management System
Samples
Ammonia, Cyanide, Controller and Software $7,000
Nitrogen in Wastewater, Upgrades to Segmented
Industrial and Marine Flow Autoanalyzer
Samples
Bacterial Identification in Controller and Software $10,000
Wastewater and Marine Upgrades to Automated
Samples Identification System itek
PCBs, Pesticides and other Software and Hardware $12,000
Organic Contaminants in upgrades to Liquid
Marine Sediment, Chromatography Systems
Wastewater and Industrial
Samples
OMTS COMMITTEE Mes;eda11gDace r01126199
xaa.
AGENDA REPORT RemNumE 10emMM
OMTS99-14 12(E)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Edwin Hodges, Director of General Services Administration
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: SEASIDE FINANCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT AT PLANT NO. 1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside Financial Corporation
(Specification No. L-009-1) for lease of 18.09 acres of land at the northeast comer of
Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley, for one year.
SUMMARY
The District currently has a lease with Seaside Financial for approximately 18 acres of
land at the comer of Garfield and Ward in Fountain Valley. Seaside Financial uses this
land for a Self-Storage facility. The lease will be expiring in September 1999. The
District receives$75,000, plus 12.5% of all revenues generated by the tenant
Strategic Plan preferred alternative includes the District's participation in the
Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS). The proposed GWRS facility will
encroach about 400 feet into District's property that is presently leased to Seaside
Financial. The lease can continue through 2001 without impacting planned construction
activities. After 2001, an area extending a minimum of 600 feet into the District's
property should be reserved for construction activities. The exact space requirements
for the GWRS will not be known until November 2000, when the preliminary engineering
work is completed.
Beginning in 2002, several construction projects are planned at Plant No. 1, including
the Primary Clarifier Expansion, Trickling Filter Rehabilitation, and the GWRS. These
projects will require significant space for contractor staging areas. If the District does
not make sufficient staging area available for the contractors, construction costs could
increase substantially due to the pass-through of costs for storing materials and
equipment off-site.
Given these anticipated space requirements, Staff recommends that the Directors
authorize the General Manager to enter into contract negotiations with Seaside
Financial and that the terms of the extension be no less than they currently are.
At the end of this term, staff recommends that the District prepare a RFP and
competitively bid a 5-10 year lease for the remaining available section of land. It is
further recommended that any lease have a provision that the District can terminate the
lease with a one-year notice. The one year notice provision will allow the District
sufficient time to plan and design new facilities before the property is needed for
construction.
x:rtr.mwp.aae�u r4va.a.we++aaemw ip.e.aroma' txmc Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not Applicable
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem:
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None Required
ATTACHMENTS
None
M Wp.OhbpeMeA aN�peMe Reprh\)B6 ".A,.Reparm�121 he Page
OMTS COMMITTEE needegom ro't
5/OS/99 5126199
AGENDA REPORT RemNumim aemNUmm
ON1599.15 12(e)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Edwin Hodges, Director of General Services Administration
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve District funding for Cooperative Projects related to inflow and infiltration
reduction totaling $2,257,656 as recommended by the Guidance Review Committee.
SUMMARY
In January 1999, twenty-two proposals were received from cities and sanitary districts
for District funding of Cooperative projects, with requests totaling $5,738,546. The
Guidance Review Committee, has reviewed the requests and recommends funding
fifteen projects for a total of$2,257,656 for the first year of the program. These projects
include nine repair projects and six studies.
The Guidance Review Committee evaluated the proposals based on potential benefits
to the District, including: (1) savings to the District due to reduced infiltration flow, (2)
reduction in peak flow (inflow), (3) environmental benefits such as reduction in
exfiltration, and (4) development of District's geographic information system and
comprehensive 1/1 studies.
The Guidance Review Committee recommends that District funding of repair projects be
contingent upon the local agency committing to adopt water conservation best
management practices and implementation of a grease control ordinance. The
Guidance Review Committee also recommends that District funding for studies should
be contingent upon the study providing an estimate of inflow and infiltration in the study
area.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Cooperative Project Funding Request Summary.
The attached table lists the local agencies and their proposed cooperative projects. The
table includes the funding requested, the estimated infiltration reduction and annual
savings to the District. The annual savings estimate is based on an estimate of the rate
of groundwater infiltration into the sewer multiplied by the District's estimated savings of
$0.11 per gallon per day per year. This unit savings was developed in the Strategic
Plan for determining the District's cost savings resulting from water conservation. The
savings estimate and other factors listed on the table were taken into account by the
Guidance Review Committee in determining which projects would be eligible for District
funding.
H.M9.ftegMe M Pagel
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section a—Page 230)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
M w'p.NaaG•M.ubaN A,. Page 2
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 0311A CT
COOPERATIVE PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY
Totalro e< Other ecommen aquas a
Local Agency Project Coen$ Requested,$ Infiltration Est.gpd Annual Savings,$ Benefit Funding
REPAIR PROJECTS fit R)
Huntington Beach Imp ofexhang mains $ 1,800,OD0.00 $ 900,000.0D 60.000 $ 5.500.00 A,B,C Yes
Sunset Beach Slip lining $ 110,000.00 $ 55,000.00 230,000 $ 25,300.00 AB,C Yes
Seal Beach OM Town Sewer $ 253,500.00 $ 126,900.01) 78,500 $ 6,415.OD A,B.0 Yes
Midway City Sanitary District ME sewer $ 65D,000.00 $ 325.000.00 360,000 $ 39,600.00 AS Yes
Midway City Sanitary District Spot Repairs $ 125,000.00 $ 63,000.00 NIA WA No
Newport Beach Known Infilt $ 112,200.00 $ 55.100.00 260.000 S 27,500.00 AB.0 Yes
La Habra Sewer Project 6 739,328.00 $ 369.664.00 903,901 $ 99,429.11 A.8 Yes
Santa Ana Replace Civic Ctr Sewers $ 302,000.00 $ 151,OOD.00 WA No
Santa Ana MH Replacement $ 220,000.00 $ 110,000.00 WA No
Placentia Seal MH $ 15,000.00 $ 7,500.DD AB Yes
Buena Park Reline existing sewer $ 140,000.00 $ 70,01DO.00 10.000 $ 1,100.00 A,B Yes
Buena Park MH Repair $ 40.000.00 $ 20.000.00 No
Buena Perk Replace Sewer $ 90,000.D0 $ 45,000.00 No
Santa Ana MH Cover Relpsu menl $ 116,000.00 $ 58.000.00 A Yes
Hunfington Beach Pump Stations E 1,300,000.00 $ 650,0W.00 NIA No
Buena Park VepO Rooting $ 28,OOD.00 $ 14,0D0.00 WA No
STUDIE Ist Rl
Seal Beach Sawar Masrlplan $ S0,000.00 $ 25,0D0.00 WA WA D Yes
MidwayCity Sanitary District Podeble CCN $ 45,000A0 $ 22,500.00 NIA WA AB, ,D Yw
Santa Ana Vidso Inspection $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000.00 WA WA AB C D Yes
Garden Grow Sewer Study $ 315,564.00 $ 157,782.00 NIA WA 0 Yes
Placentia Video Study $ 85,0DO.00 $ 42.500.00 WA NIA AB,C.D Yea
Garden Grove Financial Plan $ 133,000.0D $ 66,500.DD WA NIA No
Seal Beach GIS $ 33.421.00 $ 16.710.00 NI WA D as
TOTAL $ 6,764,313.00 $ 3,377,156.00 1.880.401 $ 206,544.11 $ 2.257.656.00
OCSD Fundina Conditions:
(1) Implementation of water conservation best management practices.
(2)Implementation of grease ordinance.
(3)Studies must include an estmar of Inflow and Infil"lion in study area.
(4)GIS mapping must Include OCSD facilities as well as local facilities.
Potential OCSD Benefits:
A Inflow(peak)reduction consistent with Strategic Plan 20%reduction.
B Infiltraflonreduction.
C Environmental benefits,exfiltregon reduction.
D Information for develop
ment of OCSD GIS and comprehensive III studies.
coop prof spreadsheet.xls 11:36 AMV27I99
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, May 6, 1999, at 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 6, 1999, at 5:00 p.m., in the
District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Bob Colon, Director of Operations&
Steve Anderson Maintenance
John Collins, Past Chair Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Jack Mauller Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Russell Patterson Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
Christina Shea Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Dennis May, Project Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Mullins, Project Manager
Andrei loan, Project Manager
Directors Absent: Peter Hass
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
None
OTHERS PRESENT:
Ken Alton
Bob Finn
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
r
0
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 2
May 6, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the April 1, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair recognized Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, who briefed the
Directors on recent media activity at the District.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager did not make a report.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
In the absence of the Director of Engineering, John Linder, Construction Manager reported to the
Board of Directors on the seismic retrofitting and waterproofing project the administration building was
undergoing. He also briefed the Directors on the status of Contract No. 3-38-1, Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and
the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%.
(11) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. a-g)
a. PDC99-21: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fire Alarm and Security System
Upgrades, Job No. J-57, with the First Fire System, Inc., authorizing an
addition of$6,369 and 35 calendar days, increasing the total contract
amount to $360,710.49; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of
$90,000 for a total project budget of$650,000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve this item.
i
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
May 6, 1999
b. PDC99-22: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntich
Construction Company, Inc., authorizing an addition of$71,597 and 17
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $5.184,355.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval. Director Steve Anderson opposed.
c. PDC99-23: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4
and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-53.2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant
No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary
Sedimentation Basins 6.15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction,
Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,677, increasing the total contract
amount to $9,017,443; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 with Margate
Construction, Inc., authorizing a deduction of$2,355 for a total contract
amount of$9,015,088; and, (3)Accept Job Nos. P11-41, P1-43, P1-44,
P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021, and SP19950059 as complete,
authorizing a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
d. PDC99-24: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the
Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal
Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation,
Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), on file at the office of the Board
Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation; (3)Award a contract to Barnard Construction
Company, Inc. for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-35R(Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard
Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R
(Rebid), for an amount not to exceed $7,686,000; (4)Approve a
budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid)in the amount
of$806,264 for a total budget of$9,133,664; and (5)Approve a
budget amendment for Contract No. 3-11R (Rebid) in the amount
of$129,736, for a total budget of$625,936.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
r
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 4
May 6, 1999
e. PDC99-25: Approve Professional Services Agreement with KS Dunbar&Associates
Environmental Engineering to prepare the Environmental Impact Report
for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment, Contract No. 2-41, for
an amount not exceed $156,000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval, and
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be directed to attempt to obtain a
resolution from SAWPA committing to a 52/48% split of costs for the
design of the project.
f. PDC99-26: Authorize the General Manager to delegate authority to the Purchasing
Manager to negotiate and purchase two 2000 kW Diesel standby
generator systems and associated electrical equipment for Standby
Power and Reliability Improvements for Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2,
Job No. J-33-1, for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend
approval.
g. PDC99-27: (1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Computer Facility
Integration for development of an electronic document management
system for the District's Engineering Department, and development of
computerized utility atlas for the District's treatment plants, for a total not
to exceed $2,303,683; and (2)Approve Professional Services
Agreement with FM International to provide technical and project
management assistance for a total not to exceed $243,000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend
approval.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
t
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
May 6, 1999
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
(16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
June 3, 1999, at 5:00 p.m.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Submitted by:
`Y r
Penny M. le
PDC CornIttee Secret.ry
H:My.dtale9andaXPDCN'DC99WMINSOSO699 minuln.dae
PDC COMMITTEE Mee6ngDae Toea.Drar.
5/6/99 5/26199
AGENDA REPORT Rem NumW R¢m mC vxv9-n
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwi irec tor of Engineering
Originator: can Fisher, Project Manager
SUBJECT: FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADES,
JOB NO. J-57
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job
No. J-57, with First Fire System, Inc. authorizing an addition of$6,369 and 35
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $360,710.49; and (2)
Approve a budget amendment of$90,000, for a total project budget of$650.000.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 1 includes two items of added work to Job No. J-57. There
are no errors or omission items associated with this change order. There is a
35 calendar-day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated
damages on this contract are$50 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
The budget for this project was increased from $506,000 to $560,000 as part of
the Board Agenda in February 1998 to account for a higher than expected
construction bid. That revised budget did not have sufficient funds for staff costs.
Staff costs are higher than expected due to after-hours work and assistance from
Information Technology and Maintenance staff. A net budget increase of
$90,000 is required to bring the total budget to$650,000.
Contract Start Date April 27, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date January 21, 1999
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date January 21, 1999
Projected Completion Date April 30, 1999
Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
G NlglobaW da D, RepaftP .57CO1.AR.E
Re .ed. Ylbgg Page 1
A
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Amount $354,341.49
Previous Authorized Changes 0.00
This Change 6,369.00
Change Orders to Date 6,369.00
Percentage Increase to Date 1.80%
Amended Contract Amount $360,710.49
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
(Line item: CIP, Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities, Item 2c)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Cost for the Construction Staff tasks on the Budget Information Table have
overrun the current budget. Funds for these cost overruns are being provided by
utilizing the current project contingency fund and by requesting approval for
additional budget funds. See attached Budget Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Job Number J-57, Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, includes
installation of new fire alarm equipment in the Administration Building, Control
Center, Operations Center, Laboratory, Human Resources Building, and other
buildings with network connectivity and integration into the security system. Lee
and Ro prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to
First Fire Systems on February 24, 1998. The project is currently substantially
complete. In addition to the construction contract, this project provides additional
funds to install a fiber optic network for the fire alarm panels. The following
summarizes the change order:
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Change Conduit Coating 1 $6,369.00 14 Design Change
2 Additional Contract Time for $ 0.00 21 Other
Delays
TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $6,369.00 1 35
MO IM021M19lcbMgenda DnX Re�.57=AR dm
Rew. =M Page 2
Y
The current project budget was established in February 1998, concurrent with the
contract award. At that time, the budget was increased to account for a larger
than expected bid, additional project management, and contingency costs. Since
that time, the budget has proved insufficient to cover staff costs associated with
the implementation of this project. This budget revision accounts for the
additional staff time.
Staff costs associated with construction inspection, Information Technology and
Maintenance staff support are higher than originally budgeted. Construction
inspection costs are higher than estimated since much of the contract work
involves after-hours work on office buildings requiring dedicated overtime
inspection. Due to the nature of the project, other departments have also
contributed a significant effort in assisting with the project. Information
Technology staff has been very involved in assisting Engineering with issues
such as networking, programming, hardware, software, and system integration.
Maintenance has also assisted Engineering with the implementation of the fiber
optic system and has provided expertise for integration into the building's HVAC
systems and sprinkler systems.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is exempt from CEQA requirements. A Notice of Exemption was
filed on March 17, 1993.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
DF:Ic
14vOVI1tlablM�EfMgeMa dbl NeFa1Ptt1.PfA1.M.dc
eesee. mse Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades
JOB /CONTRACT NO. J-57
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $ 828 $ 828 $ $ 828 S 828 S 828 100%
Design Staff $ 1,540 $ 2,125 $ 11,196. $ 13.321 $ 2.125 $ 11,196. $ 13,321 $ 13,321 100%
Consultant PSA $ - $ $ $ 8 0%
rConstruction
tract $ 335,000 $ 354,341 $ 6,369 $ 360,710 $ 354,341 $ 6,369 $ 360,710,49 $ 331.671 92%
er' $ 133,000 $ 133,000 $ 33,383 $ 166,383 $ 133,000 $ 33,383 $ 166.383 $ 150,263 90%
f" $ 37460 $ 52,775 $ 55,983 $ 108,758 �•F $ 52,775 $ 55,983 $ 108.758 $ 54,528 50%
$ - $ 17,759 $ 17.769 $ 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
$ 507,000 $ 560.000 $ 90.000 $ 650,000 ':ii". $ 542,241 $ 107,759 1 $ 650,000 $ 550,611
Note-"Construction(Other)"category includes costs within budget designated for Information Technology to install Fiber Optic network backbone.
Note-"Construction Staff category includes all costs not specifically associated with other categories(e.g. training, legal fees, testing contractors, etc.)
h:WMameng4abs..9-5�udgenRavised Budget ubie
Form Revised IV1 Me
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades
Job No. J-57
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 2124/98 $ 354,314.49 $ 354,341.49 0.00 270 270
CO NO. 1 Pending $ 6,369.00 $ 360,710.49 1.80 35 305
h:\wp.dta1eng\jobs..y-57tC0 Status Report
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 1 of 3
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: First Fire Systems, Inc C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades Job No J-57
Consultant: Lee and Ro Engineers
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduel) $6,369.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - CHANGE CONDUIT COATING
This item provides additional labor and materials to change the electrical conduit and fittings in some
areas from uncoated Galvanized Rigid Steel (GRS) to PVC-coated GRS conduit. The PVC-coated
conduit is significantly better at resisting corrosion for improved reliability and maintenance. Additional
contract time results from the longer lead-time associated in obtaining the PVC-coated materials. The
specifications required PVC-coated conduit in certain wet areas. Staff required the PVC coating in
additional corrosive areas to improve the reliability of the installation. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,369.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 —ADDITIONAL CONTRACT TIME FOR DELAYS
This item adds contract time for delays caused by District staff when facilities and/or when resources
were not available for the Contractor to continue the work. The work in the office buildings required
construction at night and on weekends in order to minimized the disturbance to Staff. On several
occasions District staff and inspectors were not available after hours in order to monitor the
Contractor's work. As a safety precaution and a liability issue to the Contractor and to the District,
contractors are not permitted to work on District facilities unattended. Therefore access was denied on
these occasions. A time extension to the contract was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 21 calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $6,369.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 35 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX$127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. First Fire Systems, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57
Consultant: Lee and Ro Enoineers
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 35 calendar day
time extension is required for this change order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: April 27, 1998
Original Contract Time: 270 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: January 21, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 35 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 35 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 305 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 25. 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date: NIA
Estimated Final Completion Date: April 9, 1999
Original Contract Price $ 354,341.49
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 6,369.00
Amended Contract Price $ 360,710.49
Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: First Fire Systems, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57
Consultant: Lee and Ro Engineers
Board Authorization Date: May 26, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
oVo x�y. '9 L3-Y9
CaKstruction Manager Date
Ap roved y
Director of Engineering D e
Accepted by:
First Fire Sys s, Inc.
2 L %c
Co raclor Date
H:1WRDTMENGU08S 8 CONTRACTSU-57=1.DOC
PDC COMMITTEE McWngDae r0Bd.mar.
5/6/99 5/26/93
y AGENDA REPORT ' c99 zz t�3
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludj
ector of Engineering
Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Manager
SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM,
REACH 3, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, AND CITY OF LA HABRA STREET
IMPROVEMENTS FOR EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE AT IMPERIAL
HIGHWAY/IDAHO STREET INTERSECTION, PROJECT NO. 2-R-97
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc.,
authorizing an addition of$71,597, and 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract
amount to $5,184,355.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 7 includes seven items of added work to Contract No. 3-38-3 and
Project No. 2-R-97. Two items will be reimbursed by the City of La Habra related to
Project No. 2-R-97. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750 per calendar day
and there are no bonus provisions.
Contract Start Date October 1, 1997
Original Contract Completion Date November 24, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 7
Current Contract Completion Date February 11, 1999
Actual Completion Date N/A
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $4,587,OD0
Previous Authorized Changes 525,758
This Change 71,597
Change Orders to Date 597,355
Percentage Increase 13.02%
Amended Contract Price $5,184,355
t
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 5, Item b)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contract No. 3-38-3, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, and
Project No. 2-R-97, City of La Habra Street Improvements for Eastbound Right Turn
Lane at Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, consist of the construction of a new
trunk sewer with manholes in Imperial Highway from Beach Boulevard to Harbor
Boulevard. The new sewer varies in size from 24-inches to 39-inches. The plans and
specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. This contract is
98% complete. The construction contract was awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction
Company, Inc., in August 1997,
The following table summarizes the Change Order:
ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
NO.
1 Added Traffic Control Signs for $4,421 3 Other
Idaho Detour
2 Temporary Relocation of 3,105 1 Other
Merchant Sign
3 Added Direction Signs for 8,599 2 Other
Businesses
4 Shutdown of Pipe Laying 32,048 3 Other
Operation
5 Repair Existing CALTRANS 5,206 2 Changed Condition
Storm Drain
6 Repair 18-inch Sewer and 14.366 5 Changed Condition
Remove Undisclosed Concrete
7 Locate and Support Utilities 3,852 1 Changed Condition
TOTAL —Change Order No. 7 $71,697 17
The City of La Habra initialed Items 1 and 2 and the District will be reimbursed by the
City. District staff initiated items 3 and 4. The other items would have been included in
the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. There is no rework
involved. See attached change order for more information.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None,
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
SK:Ic
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Improvements to Miller Holder Trunk Sewer, et al
Contract 3-38-3, et al
r
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET(1) INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $
Desi n Staff $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50.000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 100%
ronsultant PSA $ 125,000 $ 125.000 S 105.000 $ 105,000 $ 104,000 99%
tion Contract $ 3000000 $ 5,112,758 $ 71,597 $ 5.184355 $ 5112,758 $ 71,591 $ 5,184,355 $ 4632828 89%
tion Other $ $
tion Staff $ 200,000 $ 941,650 $ 941,650 $ 941,650 $ 941,650 $ 790,593 84%
nc $ 114,592 $ . 71,597 $ 42,995 $
TOTAL $ 3,250,000 1 $ 6,344,000 $ -.1 $ 6.344.000 $ 6.209408 1 $ 71,5971 $ 6,281,005 $ 5,577,421 89°A
(1) The contructicn contract budget includes$330,856 for Project No. 2-R-97 which will be reimbursed by the City of La Habra
b:my.dmteevo tsde.lmble
Furor Ravlaed IV17M
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System
Contract No. 3-38-3, at al
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 10/1197 $ 4,587,000 $ 4,587,000 0.00% 420 420
CO NO. 1` 3/19198 $ 46,831 $ 4,633,831 1.02% 0 420
CO NO. 2` 4/21198 $ 35,562 $ 4,669,393 1.80% 7 427
CO NO. 3" 6124/98 $ 49,488 $ 4,718,881 2.88% 0 427
CO NO. 4 8127198 $ 353.988 $ 5,072,869 10.59% 46 473
CO NO. 5" 1018/98 $ 39.889 $ 5,112,758 11.46% 9 482
CO NO. 6` 10/10/98 $ - $ 5,112,758 0.00% 0 482
CO NO. 7 Pending $ 71,597 $ 5,184,355 13.02% 17 499
Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
"Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
3383:w7chngstat
Y
Page 1 of 5
ORANGE COUNTRY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Seven (7)
Date: Mav 26, 1999
Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract
No. 3-38-3 And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Right-
Turn Lane At The Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Dedusf) $71,597.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 — PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SIGNS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL AT IDAHO DETOUR
This item is to supply and place additional construction and regulatory signs for the Idaho right
turn lane detour. These additional signs were placed at the request and direction of the City of
La Habra. This item will be submitted to the City for reimbursement. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-20)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,421.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - PROVIDE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF MERCHANT SIGN
This item is to keep displayed and lighted, 24-hours a day, the "Chief Auto Parts" sign throughout
construction of the right turn pocket at Idaho Street. The existing sign location and the new sign
location interfered with the retaining wall construction. Therefore, it was necessary to make a
temporary display of the sign outside of the work area. This extra move was not provided for in
the contract. This item will be submitted to the City for reimbursement. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-21)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,105.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
WadonWalal Wpdta�ngVOBS&CONTRACTS\MB- W0-7. o
r
Page 2 of 5
ORANGE COUNTRY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Seven (7)
Date: Mav 26. 1999
Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract
No. 3.38-3. And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Riaht-
Tum Lane At The Imoerial Hiohwav/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97
ITEM 3 - PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DIRECTION SIGNS FOR BUSINESSES
This item is for providing directional signs and Changeable Message Signs (CMS)to direct
motorists to business entrances during the Holiday seasons, in the vicinity of Imperial and Harbor
Boulevard. Staff directed the Contractor to place these signs in order to mitigate the impact of
the construction work to the businesses within the above-mentioned area. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference FCO 3383-22)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,599.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
ITEM 4-SHUTDOWN OF PIPE LAYING OPERATON
This item is for suspension of pipe laying operations through the week prior to Christmas Day,
1998. The pipe laying operation was suspended to give holiday shoppers full access through the
construction zone to the Target store and other businesses at the Imperial Highway and Harbor
Boulevard intersection. This was initiated by Staff to soften the impact of construction activity
from Harbor Boulevard to 600 feet west of Harbor Boulevard. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a)of the General Provision. (Reference FCO 3383-24)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $32,048.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
ITEM 5- REPAIR EXISTING CALTRANS STORM DRAIN
This item is for the repair of six existing metal storm drainpipes that were found badly corroded
while constructing the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to repair the pipe lines to
prevent future possible leakage into the new sewer line trench. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 9.6(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,206.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
ivaawi Ir P.mavrqiuoesscowrRAcrsm•a1-3ZO-7AM
y
Page 3 of 5
ORANGE COUNTRY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION INC C.O. No.: Seven (7)
Date: May 26. 1999
Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract
No. 3-38-3. And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Right-
Turn Lane At The Imperial HighwaylIdaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97
ITEM 6- REPAIR ADJACENT 18-INCH SEWER AND REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED
CONCRETE
This item is to repair the existing Imperial Trunk Sewer that was leaking through a cracked bell
into the bore pit at Station 256+00. Additionally, undisclosed concrete structures were found
during the pile drilling operations, which had to be removed. This occurred at six locations
between Station 253+75 to Station 258+90. This item was accomplished by Contractors force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,366.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
ITEM 7 - LOCATE AND SUPPORT UTILITIES
This item compensates the Contractor for exposing, excavating, and supporting an undisclosed
3-inch electrical conduit crossing the pipe trench at Station 261+05 and for delay time for locating
a 2-inch gas line shown at Station 260+72, but actually located at Station 260+55. This item was
accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 9.6(f.g) of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,852,00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $71,597.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 17 Calendar Days
Wadanwatai Wpdta�ngUOB58 C0NTRACTS'138-3tC0-7.dM
9
Page 4 of 5
ORANGE COUNTRY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor MLADEN SUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Seven (7)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3. Contract
No. 3-38-3, And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Riaht-
Tum Lane At The Imperial Hiohwav/Idaho Street Intersection, Project No. 2-R-97
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime
work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time
made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 17
day time extension is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: October 1, 1997
Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: November 24, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 17 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 79 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 499 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 11, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 4,587,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 525,758.00
This Change Changes (Add) $ 71,597.00
Amended Contract Price $ 5,184,355.00
% adonwawiwvp.0la guOBs S CONTRACTSQi38-31C0JAM
Page 5 of 5
ORANGE COUNTRY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. C.O. No.: Seven (7)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Improvements To Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract
No. 3-38-3, And City of La Habra Street Improvements For An Eastbound Right-
Turn Lane At The Imperial Highway/Idaho Street Intersection Proiect No. 2-R-97
Board Approval Date: May 26, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SutRitted by:
yvii, 3 -9
nstruction Manager Date
Ap oved b .
u' S
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
MLAADEN BUNTTIIC(pJH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
d/ nt
/J�a r4
Coractor Dale
ktrdonW talw,dla�nguoos 8 CONTRACTS�3 =0-7.dw
PDC COMMITTEE To ad.ofD,.
5/6/99 5/26199
AGENDA REPORT `mNum r
County Sanitation Districts Z, irector
unty,Califomia
FROM: David Lu of Engineering
Originator: Dave Erdkamp, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3, 4, AND 5
AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-41, ET AL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P141; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary
Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021;
and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059,
with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,677, increasing the total
contract amount to $9,017,443; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 to the contract w th
Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing a deduction of$2,355, for a total contract
amount of$9,015,088, and (3)Accept Job Nos. P141, P143, P144, P2-48, P2-50,
P2-53-2, SP19950021, and SP19950059, as complete, authorizing a Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction,
Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 6 includes four items of added and deleted work to Job No. P141,
at al. Change Order No. 9 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. There is no time
extension associated with these change orders. Liquidated damages on this contract
are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed.
Contract Start Date July 22,1996
Original Contract Completion Date July 11, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 8
Current Contract Completion Date December 21, 1998
Actual Completion Date December 21, 1998
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damages 0
x eyevmoe„mwoewvesaaenasean v �i rcaeevad+rm„
oNeKmK Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY /
Original Contract Price: $8,461,138.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 501.628.00
Change Order No. 8 (Add) $ 54,677.00
Change Order No. 9 (Deduct) $ (2,355.00)
Change Orders To Date $ 553,950.00
Percentage Increase: 6.55%
Amended Contract Price $9,015,088.00
Note: Change Order No. 2, in the amount of$197,299, was the construction of the
Green Acres Discharge Facility which was added work not related to this project.
The change order percentage would have been 4.2% without Change Order
No. 2.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORE -C.5.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
See Attached Budget Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Job No. P1-41, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1 and Jab
No. P2A8, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, consists of
replacement of deteriorated access bridges and other steel framing with new fiberglass
components, replacement of sweep motors and automation of the instrumentation and
control systems for the clarifiers. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans
and specifications for Job Nos. P1-41 and P2A8.
Job No. Pt-43, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2 and Job
No. 132-50, Seismic Retrofit on Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, consist of
seismic anchorage of electrical, mechanical and process control equipment throughout
both plants and replacement of deteriorated pipe supports in existing tunnels. Carollo
Engineers prepared the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-43 and P2-50.
Job No. P1-44, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P2-53-2, Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 2, consists of upgrading the structural connections and foundation anchorage
in twenty-four existing buildings throughout both plants. Holmes and Narver prepared
the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-44 and P2-53-2.
SP19950021, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2 and
SP19950059, Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 at Plant
No. 1, are small projects designed by District's staff.
c amowna. a.a.n n.wmwocw�i.�e.,me�ev
o E r Page 2
r
The Construction Contract for these jobs was awarded to Margate Construction Inc. and
construction began on July 22, 1996. The contract is now complete. The following
summarizes the change order:
Change Order No. 8
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Repairs made to Center $9,442 0 Changed Condition
Cage on Primary Basins.
2 Temporary Relocation of
Primary Basins Control $28,075 0 Design Change
Panels.
3 Relocation of Auto Control $17,160 0
Buttons to Motor Control Design Change
Centers.
Total Change Order No. 8 1 $54,677 0
Change Order No. 9
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Adjustment of Engineer's $(2,355) 0 Other
Quantities.
Total Change Order No. 9 $ $355 0
All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if
discovered or known in the design phase.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Orders
G'+4�� DM FeW4WOLIVr�IamBNmOz4Nrr
rmt Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHAB. AT PLANT NO. 1, et al
JOB NO. P1-41, et al
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
V;Ike BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE)%)
Project Development $ $
Design Staff $ 3,704075 $ 3704075 3 3,104,075 $ 2.959,418 $ 2959,418 $ 2959418 100%
Consultant PSA
Construction Contract $ 11316,425 $ 11.316425 3 11,816425 $ 8,962 i66 $ 52,322 $ 9015088 $ 8960000 99%
Construction Other $ $
Construction Staff $ 2,800000 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,618,706 $ 2.618706 $ 2500660 95%
Contin enc g $
TOTAL 1 $ 17,820,500 $ 17,820,500 1 $ - $ 17.820,500 $ 14,540,890 $ 52,322 $ 14,593,212 1 $ 14.420.088 99%
'Costs are included with Design Staff
I,Wq le a
Fa RWl N199
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Primary Clarifier Rehab. at Plant No. 2 ET AL
Job No. 127-41, at al
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 7/22/96 $ 8,461,138.00 $ 8,461,138.00 720 720
CO NO. 1 7123/97 $ (85,680,00) $ 8,375,455.00 -1.01% 37 757
CO NO. 2 9/30/97 $ 197,299.00 $ 8,572,757.00 1.32% 0 757
CO NO. 3 11/19/97 $ 93,811.00 $ 8,666,568.00 2.43% 0 757
CO NO. 4' 3/1/98 $ 26,091.00 $ 8,692,659.00 2.74% 0 757
CO NO. 5 3125/98 $ 97,426.00 $ 8,790,085.00 3.89% 26 783
CO NO. 6 6/24/98 $ 92,620.00 $ 3,882,705.00 4.98% 44 827
CO NO. 7" 2/4199 $ 80.061.00 $ 8,962,766.00 5.93% 56 883
CO NO. 8 Pending $ 54,677.00 $ 9,017,443.00 6.70% 0 883
CO NO. 9 Pending $ (2,355.00) $ 9,015,088.00 6.50% 0 883
-Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
••Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Boatd Resolution 98-8
H:...Pl-41 CO No. 8 STATUS REPORT
Page 1 of 4 ;
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight 8
Date: Mav 26. 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No 1 Job No P11-44� Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2.
Job No. 132-50� Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059
Amount of this Change Order(Add) $54,677.G0
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work is hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
JOB NO. 131-41 & P2-48
ITEM 1 - REPAIRS TO CENTER CAGE OF PRIMARY BASINS
While the Contractor was draining and cleaning the 17 primary basins it became apparent that some
minor repairs would have to be made in order to install the new fiberglass baffles. Due to existing
corrosion it was determined that additional structural steel support members were needed to
strengthen the center support cages. This unforeseen condition caused additional work that was not
part of the original contract. The repair areas were under water and could not be accessed until the
basins were empty. This item was performed by Contractor's force account in accordance with the
General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). (Reference FCO No.20). (PI-41 = 17 %, P2-48 = 83 %)
COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,442.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 -TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF BASINS CONTROL PANELS
This item of work includes the removal and relocation of the existing control panels that operate the
basin's sludge pumps to temporary locations to allow for the new PLC control cabinets to be installed
inside the motor control rooms. Nine control panels were relocated, two at Plant No. 1 and five at
Plant No. 2. This was a request by District staff to improve the capability of monitoring each basin.
Also included in this item are costs associated with wiring changes. When the District supplied and
installed PLC control software was being installed at each pair of basins, the Contractor was required
to change all wiring from the old temporary control panels to the new PLC control panels. This
involved work on seventeen basins, three at Plant No. 1 and fourteen at Plant No. 2. This added work
was necessary to keep the basins in service and allow the change over in the new software system
and was not included in the original contract. This item was performed by Contractor's force account in
accordance with the General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). (Reference FCO No. 15) (Pt-41=17%,
P2-48=83%)
COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,075.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1.43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2.
Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059
ITEM 3- RELOCATION OF SLUDGE PUMP AUTO CONTROLS
This item of work includes the relocation of the operational control switches from the pump rooms to
the motor control panels. This relocation will allow the Operators in the Control Centers to verify that
pumps are in auto or hand operation mode. Wiring from the control panels was run by conduits to the
PLC Control Panels to allow the pump status to be determined in the Operation and Control Centers.
Seventeen basins were involved in this item of work. Three basins at Plant No. 1 and fourteen basins
at Plant No. 2 were changed. This additional work was requested by Operations to provide additional
control of the basins from the Operation and Control Centers. This item was performed by Contractors
force account in accordance with the General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2 (b). Reference FCO No. 38.
(P1-41=17 %, P2-48= 83%)
COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 17,160.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 54,677.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Maroate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Ei ht 8
Date: Mav 26, 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P248: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2.
Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billinas Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is
required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential posts, expenses,
losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and
approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: July 22, 1996
Original Contract Time: 720 Days
Original Completion Date: July 11. 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 163 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 883 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Date: December 21, 1998
Actual Final Completion Date: December 21, 1998
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA
Original Contract Price S 8,461,138.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 501,628.00
This Change (Add) (Peduet) $ 54,677.00
Amended Contract Price $9,017,443.00
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eight (8)
Date: May 26. 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant
No. 2 Job No. P2-48 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2
Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP199500217 and Sludae Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059
Board Authorization Date: May 26, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Su fitted by:
/ ¢-2
O nstruction Manager Date
A rove &..
Dire or of Engineering [[[ Date
Accepted by:
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
l27
C actor Date
Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
106" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-3127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nine (9)
Date: May 26, 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pl-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant
No. 2 Job No. P2-4& Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2
Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059
Amount of this Change Order(Deduct) $ 2 355.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work is hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
JOB NO. P1<1 8, 13250
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
JOB NO. Pl-43
Bid Item Nos. 4- 62 are unit price items on the original Schedule of Prices.
The subtotal for Bid Items 4-62 is: $ 928,287.00
These bid items were adjusted by actual work units completed.
The adjusted amount resulted in a deduction of: $ (1,167.00)
New Adjusted Schedule Price $ 927,120.00
JOB NO. 13250
Bid item Nos. 67 - 174 are unit price items on the original Schedule of Prices.
The subtotal for Bid Items 67 - 174 is: $1,114,251.00
These bid items were adjusted by actual work units completed.
The adjusted amount resulted in a deduction of: $ (1,188.00)
New Adjusted Schedule Price $1,113,063.00
The total adjustment to the Engineer's Quantities is a credit of$(2,358.00)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,355.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (2,355.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Maroale Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nine (9)
Date: Mav 26. 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pl-43: Seismic Retrofit at
Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2.
Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is
required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses,
losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and
approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: July 22, 1996
Original Contract Time: 720 Days
Original Completion Date: July 11, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 163 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 883 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Date: December 21, 1998
Actual Final Completion Date: December 21, 1998
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA
Original Contract Price $8,461,138.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 556,305.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (2,355.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 9,015,088.00
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nine (9)
Dale: Mav 26. 1999
Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. 121-41: Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit al
Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D throuah O at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2,
Job No. 132-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No, 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover
Reolacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. S1319950021: and Sludge Piping
Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6.15, SP19950059
Board Authorization Date: May 26, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Su fitted by:
C nstructio Manager Date
Appro ad by y5
Director of Engineenng Date
Accepted by:
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9
C raclor V �7Date
PDC COMMITTEE Meetlnq Date TGad.Gr .Oh.
s-e-aa s-zb•s9
m u N I
AGENDA REPORT lR Item NumEe
1 D Nu im
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Lu ector of Engineering
Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 3-35R (REBID), AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR
SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R (REBID)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole
Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), on file at the office of the Board Secretary;
(2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Award a contract to
Barnard Construction Company, Inc. for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole
Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), for an amount not to exceed $7,686,000;
(4) Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid) in the amount of
$806,264 for a total budget of$9,133,664; and (5) Approve a budget amendment for
Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid) in the amount of$129,736, for a total budget of$625,936.
SUMMARY
This project originally bid on February 10, 1999. All bids were rejected because staff
found an error in one of the bid items in the schedule of prices.
The plans and specifications for this project, Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk
Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer
Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), were rebid on April 13, 1999.
Project Budget (Proposed) $9,759,600
Construction Budget $8,500,000
Engineer's Estimate $8,500,000
Low Responsible Bid $7,686,000
High Bid $7,929,462
Number of Bids 2
Contract No. 3-35R
Since the original engineer's estimate was prepared for Contract No. 3-35R, there have
been three significant developments that have impacted the estimate: (1) modified
traffic control requirements; (2) restricted work hours; and (3) an estimated 30 percent
increase in cost for rehabilitation materials. To accommodate these developments, the
engineer's estimate has been revised from $6,500,00 to $8,075,000. The low bid for
this project came in at $7,306,264.
GNIpIa fftw"Ono R.MftVOLU95R RaWSSJSR(ReW)M MIMAM
RwieeB. v Page 1
Contract No. 3-11 R
Since the original engineer's estimate was prepared for Contract No. 3-11 R, the
engineer has changed the liner materials to repair the manholes with a better product,
which has changed the cost of materials. To accommodate this development, the
engineer's estimate has been revised from $250.000 to $425,000. The low bid for this
project came in at $379,736.
Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the
Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard
Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), and receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award a contract to Barnard Construction
Company, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $7,686,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The construction budget for Contract
No. 3-35R was $6,500,000. The revised construction budget for Contract No. 3-35R
(Rebid) is now $7,306,264. The construction budget for Contract No. 3-11 R was
$250,000. The revised construction budget for Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid) is now
$379,736.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (19e8-99 Budget
Capital Projects Zone 3, line d)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Staff recommends approval of a budget amendment in the construction budget for
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid) in the amount of$806,264, and for Contract No. 3-11 R
(Rebid) in the amount of$129,736. Additional funds will come from District Reserves.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This rehabilitation project will restore the existing manholes and sewer line to last
another 60 to 70 years.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Master Plan. The final
EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on
July 20, 1989.
GNp WNyeMep ft Reg �R RetiNJSR(ReNC M 0W1WW
R.....e ermm Page 2
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid)
Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid)
Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
RLC:jak:jo
G:WglcbaMgenda Daft RepotlsTDCl435R RebdV-35R(Rebid)AR W1 W dot
c t,aamnnye,e:o.,rt ae�omwxvasA aerao-asA R+ee.ci u1 aa+eaem
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation
Contract No. 3-11R (Rebid)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 It 7,000 $ 7.000 $ 7,000 100%
Design Staff E 76,400 $ 78400 $ 76400 $ 76.400 $ 76,400 $ 61.884 81%
Consultant PSA $ 45.000 $ 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45.000 1 $ 44100 98%
E111;tract $ 250 000r250 $ 129,736 $ 379 736 $ 379736 $ 379736 0%
her $ 3600 $ 3,600 $ 3600 $ 3600 0%
ff $ 46000 $ 46000 $ 46,000 $ 48 000 0%
$ 68.200 $ 68.200 S 0%
$ 496,200 $ 129,736 1 It 625,936 1 1 $ 128,400 1 $ 429,336 1 $ 557,738 $ 112,984 1 20%
H:kw .dtaren9ljobs&oonuacts1135R(REBID)1111R(REBID)budeetbl
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTrFASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 32.000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32.000 $ 32,000 $ 32.000 100%
Design Staff $ 330.500 $ 330.500 $ 330,500 $ 330,500 $ 330,500 $ 226.400 69%
Consultant PSA $ 344,000 $ 344.000 $ 344,000 1 $ 344,000 $ 344,000 $ 338.280 98%
Construction Contract $ 6,500,000 $ 6.500,000 $ 806,264 $ 7.306,264 $ 7.305.264 S 7.306,264 0%
Construction Other $ 6,500 $ 6,500 $ 6500 $ 6,500 $ 6,500 0%
Construction Staff $ 402,000 $ 402,000 $ 402.000 $ 402.000 $ 402,000 0%
Contingency $ 712,400 $ 712.400 $ 712,400 $ 0%
TOTAL 1 $ 8,327,400 1 $ 8,327,400 $ 8D6,264 1 $ 9.133,664 1 1 $ 706.500 1 $ 7,714,764 1 $ 8.421,264 $ 596,680 1 7%
H1wp.Ma`engtioMBcontractsl135R(REBIDp135R (REBID)budgetbl
April 13, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 0
BID TABULATION
REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R(REBID),
AND
SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION,
CONTRACT NO. 3-11R (REBID).
Engineer's Estimate: $8,500,000 Construction Contract Budget: $8,500,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Barnard Construction Co., Inc. $ • 7,686.000
2. Sancon Engineering 11. Inc. $ ' 7.929 462
3. $
4. $
5. $
6. $
7. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a
responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to BARNARD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. in
the bid amount of$7,686,000 as the lowest ;vd
bid.
. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
• Corrected total. Barnard Construction's incorrect total was $7,692.000.
• Corrected total. Sancon Engineering's incorrect total was $7,930,962.
H:twp.dlalenguoBS 8 C0NTRACTSl7.35R REBID13-35R(REBID)Bid Tab.doc
Renaud!05119M
OCSD • P.O. Bea 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92725.8127 • (714) 962-2411
I
PDC COMMITTEE Mee6ngrm To Bd.Mar.
S161 6/7SJ99
AGENDA REPORT 1Oen1 mm "°o' W
Orange County Sanitation D'
FROM: David LudlAirector of Engineering
Originator: Andrei loan, Engineer
SUBJECT: REALIGNMENT STUDY OF THE SANTAANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-41
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with KS. Dunbar&Associates
Environmental Engineering to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the
Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment, Contract No. 241, for an amount not to
exceed $156,000; and (2) Direct staff to contact the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority in an effort to obtain their commitment to share the costs for the design and
construction of the project.
SUMMARY
In 1998, Holmes & Narver completed a study for the District to review options for
relocating the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) sewer line outside of the riverbed.
The study included five alternatives from protecting the SARI line in place to
complete removal out of the riverbed. The study verified that serious riverbed
erosion has taken place since the mid 1970s when the SARI line was built. The
study indicated a serious need to prevent the undermining and potential collapse of
the line in the riverbed due to floodwater flow in the Santa Ana River Canyon. The
District must initiate and complete a thorough Environmental Impact Report(EIR)
prior to beginning a construction project in the riverbed. The EIR must consider all
the potential alternatives that may have an impact on the environment as a result of
the project. The level and nature of the impact varies from alternative to alternative.
The cost to implement mitigation measures will also vary widely. Before staff can
determine the most cost-effective alternative, an EIR is required to examine the
necessary mitigation measures and cost associated with each alternative. The EIR
will examine two additional options for a total of seven alternatives.
Staff recommends the approval of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for
the EIR preparation with KS. Dunbar&Associates Environmental Engineering for
an amount not to exceed $156,000.
On June 6, 1999, the PDC Committee evaluated staffs recommendation. The
motion was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. The motion
was further moved to direct staff to contact the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority (SAWPA) in an effort to obtain SAWPA's commitment to share the costs
for the design and construction of the project.
G NgbbaNpeMapM Repo,nWIX.I]�11ZA1 E10.M$�D.VEREgN3 Ex
Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
In the early stages of project development, Staff anticipated including the
preparation of the EIR in the final design. Because the EIR has become a decision
factor in the selection of the final alignment, it is necessary to prepare the EIR prior
to engaging in the final design process. The EIR cost will be shared between
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority (SAWPA) in proportion of 52/48% respectively. The PSA is within the
budget for consulting services. See the attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Hem: h,Zone 2,section 8, Page 8 of the
FY 1998-1999 budget book)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Backoround
The Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI), one of Zone No. 2's trunk sewer lines,
generally parallels the Santa Ana River from the Orange/San Bernardino County
(OC/SBD) line to Plant No. 1, a distance of approximately 23 miles. The SARI line
also serves Riverside and San Bernardino Counties under the administration of the
SAWPA. The SARI line, extending east from the Weir Canyon Road to the OC/SBD
County line, runs mostly within the Santa Ana River floodplain and crosses the river
bottom at several locations.
The SARI line is in part located in the Santa Ana riverbed and was constructed in
1975. The pipeline was designed to perform under the river flow conditions present
at that time. Currently, the Corps of Engineers is in the process of raising the Prado
Dam by 30 feet, increasing the flow discharge capability from 5,000 to 30,000 cubic
feet per second (CFS).
When the SARI line was constructed in 1975, it was buried about 15 to 20 feet below
the then existing riverbed elevation. It was assumed that the depth would be
adequate to avoid any damage to the pipeline from future riverbed degradation. In
addition, it was anticipated that access to manhole structures was adequate for
ordinary inspection and maintenance.
Streambed degradation over a period of 20 years is now posing a threat of structural
damage to the pipeline and access to the manholes has become difficult due to
heavy vegetative growth. In addition, further riverbed degradation is anticipated due
to increased discharge flows from Prado Dam. The pipeline and manholes, as
presently installed, may fail in an extraordinary flood event due to erosion of the river
c nml.e.Rw.wR onR R*Mft a4M41 OR u.sw R=N2dw
R—..e. a Page 2
bottom. Such failure would allow sand, silt and debris into the pipe, and eventually
into the headworks at Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2, depending on how the sewer
flow is diverted at that time.
In 1996, Holmes & Narver prepared an extensive riverbed erosion analysis to
determine the extent of potential damages to the SARI line due to increased flows
from Prado Dam. The report indicated that the Santa Ana River riverbed has
already degraded by about six to eight feet due to flooding and entrapment of
sediment in the Prado Dam Reservoir. There has been significant erosion near the
manholes and the depth of cover over the pipeline has been reduced to about five to
six feet at several pipe crossing locations. In addition, significant erosion will occur
when flows up to 30,000 CFS will be released from the dam after it is raised by the
Corps of Engineers. On a preliminary basis, the dam improvements are scheduled
to be completed by the end of 2002. According to the report, the SARI line may be
washed out at several locations and some manholes may be completely exposed
and very likely destroyed.
EIR Purpose
In March of 1998, the OCSD Board of Directors approved a Professional Services
Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare a realignment study for the SARI line.
This report was recently completed.
The report prepared by Holmes & Narver evaluated five possible alternatives for the
relocation and protection of the SARI pipeline. The estimated construction cost for
each alternative is shown below.
Alternative Total Cost
A $17.7 mil
B1 $21.1 mil
B2 $31.2 mil
C $41.4 mil
D $34.6 mil
Each alternative evaluated in the realignment study will have an environmental
impact. The nature and intensity of the impact differs, depending on the realignment
alternatives. In addition to the pipeline relocation options shown in the table above,
there are two more possibilities. One would be to leave the SARI in its present
location and protect it to the extent possible. Staff estimates that this alternative will
have the most significant environmental impact and the mitigation measures will
incur the highest cost. Another option would be to leave the pipeline in place, as is,
without any additional protection. This option may have an environmental impact
associated with the two plants being out of service for several days.
The EIR will provide staff with additional information necessary to select a cost-
effective realignment alternative.
G MObWD/f�e dM p�pppFpPIJ,1]Jt Evi M SWN V WSgn 2aee
Page 3
Cost Participation
The project cost will be shared with SAWPA, based on the percentage of capacity
owned by the agency in the SARI line. SAWPA presently has the right to discharge
30 million gallons per day (MGD) into the SARI line. The percentage of capacity in
the SARI line varies from reach to reach. The portion of the SARI line included in
this project spans over reaches 5, 6, 7 and 8.
OCSD and SAWPA agreed to share the cost of the alignment study according to the
Scope of Work and capacity ownership in the SARI line. Therefore, OCSD and
SAWPA will pay 52 percent and 48 percent of the study cost, respectively. The EIR
addresses issues associated with the study scope of work for the alignment study.
Consequently, OCSD and SAWPA will share the cost of the EIR at the same ratio as
the study cost.
Depending on the alignment alternative selected for implementation, construction
costs will be shared based on ownership of reaches involved.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the PSA with K.S. Dunbar &Associates Environmental
Engineering be approved for the preparation of the project EIR, for a total not to
exceed amount of$156,000.
ALTERNATIVES
A realignment alternative could be selected first, before preparing the EIR. This may
lead to choosing a less appropriate alignment. Changes associated with this
approach may lead to significant project delays and unnecessary additional
expenses.
CEQA FINDINGS
The proposed project will have a significant impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Report will be prepared to identify necessary mitigation
measures.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. PSA Status Report
3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals
AI:jak
GM19101,8KAgenEa Draft Rep04STDC12-4112 41 EIR AR 50599.VER SION 2.doe
G WIIIGUM9 0OnRReppu,^C AIQ41 SIR M SORBBVERSIONtam
Rams, Rrxipa Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Realignment Study of the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Contract No. 2-41 - Preparation of EIR
Consultant: K.S. Dunbar & Associates Environmental Engineering
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 17.000 $ 17.000 $ - $ 17,000 S 17,000 S 17000 $ 13,000 76%
Design Staff $ 633000 $ 633000 $ - 3 633,000 $ 633,000 S 633,000 $ 22,300 4%
Consultant PSA $ 1.699.000 $ 1.699.000 $ - $ 1,699,000 $ 076,058 $ 156,000 $ 1032058 $ 639.533 62%
rConsnctionct $ 6,626000 $ 6.626,000 $ - $ 6,626,000 S $ - $ 0%
$ 25000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 $ $ - $ 0%
$ 1,024,000 $ 1,024000 $ - $ 1,024,000 8 $ - $ 0%
$ 1,840,000 $ 1,840,000 $ - $ 1,840,000 S $ 0%
$ 11.664,000 $ 11864.000 $ - $ 11.864.000 1 $ 1,526.058 $ 156,0001 $ 1,682,058 IS 674,833 40%
H:\wp.dta\eng\JOBS&CONTRACTS\2-41 SARI REALIGNMENT\CEQA- EIR42-41 EIR Budget Table.xls]Districts
Form RmAsm!IV17M
L-1 pints!W14M 10Ae AM
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Contract No. 2-41
Realignment Study of the Santa Ana River Interceptor— Environmental Impact Report
Total Project Budget: $11,864,000
Consultant: K.S. Dunbar& Associates Environmental Engineering
Start Date of Project: 3/25/98
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
Pending Original PSA Prepare Environmental Impact Report for the 156,000 156,000
Santa Ana River Interceptor realignment
HA .dla`e UOeS&CONTRACT=41 SARI REALIONMENME0A-OW41 PSA Status RepM EIR.d= 04/13/99
RaWsed M1 M9B
R -.
Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Relocation
Contract No. 2-41
Staff Evaluation of Proposals
On February 24, 1999, OCSD staff invited five environmental consulting firms to
submit proposals for the project EIR preparation:
• Bonterra Consulting
• K.S. Dunbar & Associates Environmental Engineering
• LSA Associates, Inc.
• P&D Consultants
• Ultrasystems Environmental
LSA Associates declined to submit a proposal due to present workload. Bonterra
Consulting was not present at the mandatory preproposal meeting and Staff
assumed that the firm did not intend to submit a proposal. The remaining three
firms submitted proposals on March 29, 1999. All proposals included a sealed
fee proposal.
A review panel evaluated and ranked the proposals based on the following
criteria:
1. Understanding of the Scope of Work
2. Project approach
3. Applicable staff qualifications
4. Team organization and use of subconsultants
5. Compliance with the project schedule
The three participating firms ranked as follows:
1. Ultrasystems Environmental —The firm provided a very detailed
Scope of Work, beyond the requirements of the Request for
Proposal (RFP) and ranked highest with respect to qualifications,
team organization and schedule.
2. K.S. Dunbar & Associates Environmental Engineering —The firm
provided a precise response to the RFP requirements and showed
outstanding staff qualifications.
3. P & D Consultants— Proposed an approach totally different from
the one outlined in the RFP. The proposed approach has some
merit; however, it may delay the project schedule by nine to twelve
months and increase the project cost in the long run. Therefore,
this proposal was considered nonresponsive.
After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals,
which were:
1. . .Ultrasystems Environmental - $298,896
2. KS. Dunbar& Associates Environmental Engineering - $156,000
3. P & D Consultants - $50,000
The review panel spent a considerable amount of time reevaluating the first two
proposals in an effort to determine if the high fee proposed by Ultrasystems
Environmental Engineering is justifiable. Staff held a teleconference with K.S.
Dunbar & Associates Environmental Engineering to determine that the EIR, if
prepared by this firm, will fulfill all CEQA requirements. Staff concluded that K.S.
Dunbar & Associates Environmental Engineering would provide a complete
EIR/EIS for a reasonable fee, as indicated above.
Staff recommends that the PSA with KS. Dunbar&Associates Environmental
Engineering be approved for the preparation of the project EIR, for a total not to
exceed amount of$156,000.
Al:jak
G:N1gIobaMgenda Draft Re parbWOCt2 IU41 staff evaluatlanAm
CSDOC CONTRACT NO. 2-41
SARI Relocation
Environmental Impact Report/Statement
STAFF EVALUATION
OF
PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
y O C
A 0 N v N
E w
LL J N C V T E
o w
a lL o
Y 0 L Q C
� .3 G w
Reviewer 1 36 23 46
Reviewer 2 41 33 47
Reviewer 3 32 39 47
Total Score 109 95 140
Fee $ 156,000 50,000 298,896
Nonresponsive
scope
R:1wp.Elale UOBS S COMRACTS1211 SARI REALIGNMEN CEGA-EIR�24I Proposal RoAm Summary x[s]Suo ary
PDC COMMITTEE nxen�y9m Told Di,
05/06/99 051j6
AGENDA REPORT 'MGM Hem Nu
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwi , irector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Mullins, Engineer
SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TREATMENT PLANT NOS 1 & 2, JOB NO. J-33-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the General Manager to delegate authority to the Purchasing Manager
to negotiate and purchase two 2000 kW Diesel standby generator systems and
associated electrical equipment for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements
for Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total amount not to
exceed $1,300,000.
SUMMARY
1. Additional generators are needed at the Plant 2 Headworks to be
prepared for the possibility of loss of utility and Central Generation power.
2. Job No. J-33-1, a current project, will install permanent standby
generators at Headworks as a part of the overall scope. Installation is
scheduled to be completed in 2001.
3. The specific circumstance of Y2K presents an increased risk of power loss
to the Headworks before this project is completed.
4. Staff has researched the feasibility of:
• leasing temporary generators for Y21K and then later replacing them
with permanent generators in Job No. J-33-1($500,000lease +
$1,300,000 capital purchase), or
• accelerating the purchase and installation of Headworks generators
separately from the remaining Job No. J-33-1 project work ($1,300,000
capital purchase). Installation would be under a separate contract
presented to the Board in July.
5. Staff recommends accelerating permanent installation thereby saving the
expense of leasing temporary units.
Hwn awo•a.voc�vora•eanmwo.xaan,momv.aoc
q,„,b Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The purchase contracts will be for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000. The
funds for this project, are contained in the FY1998-99 Capital Improvement
Budget.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 4.c, Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Reference the Budget Information Table attached.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
Staff recommended in a prior study, Job No. J-33, that additional standby
generators be installed for maintaining wastewater flow through the treatment
plants in the event of loss of utility power and the Central Generation facility. The
most critical need for standby power is at the Plant 2 Headworks. The
subsequent project that is currently in design, Job No. J-33-1 implements the
study recommendations.
Present Protect
At present there are two existing trailer-mounted generators at the Plant 2
Headworks that do not provide adequate permanent backup for influent pumping.
The scope of Job No. J-33-1 provides for installation of permanent standby
generators at the Plant 2 Headworks as well as numerous other electrical work
items related to standby power and electrical reliability improvements. This
project is presently being engineered by SPEC Services, Inc., under a
Professional Services Agreement approved by the Board in September of 1998.
Design is scheduled for completion in December 1999. Construction of the entire
project will be completed in 2002.
Short-Term Y2K Need
The Year 2000 (Y2K) problem presents the risk of loss of all utility services,
including electrical power and natural gas, at the end of 1999. In order to ensure
continued wastewater flow in view of this specific threat, staff has obtained
budgetary quotations for leasing generators from equipment rental firms.
Required equipment for Plant 2 Headworks will cost $76,000 per month, not
including fuel storage or connecting cables. However, because of the nationwide
increase in demand for rental units due to Y2K, lease quotations now require a
minimum rental of six months. Total lease costs for the Plant 2 Headworks
would then be more than $456,000. Due to differences in configuration, the
leased equipment would not be usable in the permanent facility.
�,.maeW.m.wawocwsenrsw.ze..w,nsame.e:
R. erxim Page 2
Job No. J-33-1 Prepurchase Option
Staff has determined that the speck installation of permanent standby
generators for Plant 2 Headworks can be accomplished under Job No. J-33-1 by
December 1999. In order to achieve this goal, the generators, switchgear, and
transformers must be prepurchased separately from the construction contract
that would install them.
Benefits
The early purchase of this equipment for Job No. J-33-1 will reduce the need to
lease generators for Y2K and also improve the long-term reliability of the Plant 2
Headworks Facility.
• Lease expenses for temporary generators at Headworks can be avoided.
The new installation is a permanent facility built with previously budgeted
capital funds.
• As designed in Job No. J-33-1, the new Headworks generator systems will be
sized to provide standby power for full storm flow conditions at the Headworks
with complete flexibility, redundancy and reliability in pumping operations.
• After installation of the new Headworks generators, the existing trailer-
mounted generators can then be temporarily paralleled with the two existing
units at the Foster Outfall Booster Station to provide additional standby power
for outfall pumping.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not purchase generators early under Job No. J-33-1. Instead, lease or
purchase generators for the short term Y2K period under the Y2K expense
budget.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the previously approved programmatic EIR for the
1989 Master Plan. The Master Plan was prepared by Carollo Engineers-Boyle
Engineering, Joint Venture. Jones & Stokes prepared the EIR. The final EIR
was approved July 19, 1989. The Notice of Determination was filed July 20,
1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
JCM:jo
H:1wp.Ma1 gent•WDCWDC99W9AR6\99-26.J33.105M99Aw
H F.'V��W CLW LC8P.9.,�38.. 1.05®B.hi
6e„,a,. arm• Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS
JOB NO. J-33-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTtTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 1.030.600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1,030,600 $ 1.030,600 $ 1,030,600 100%
Design Staff $ 1,371,D00 $ 1,371,000 $ 808,600 $ 808,600 $ 153,464 19%
Consultant PSA $ 2,121.748 $ 2,121.748 1 $ 2.121,748 $ 2,121,748 $ 382,724 18%
Construction Contract $ 9,240,000 $ 9.240.000 $ - $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300.000 $ 0%
Construction(Other) $ 55,0D0 $ 55,000 $ IS - $ 0%
Construction Staff $ 1,139.000 $ 1,139,000 $ $ - $ 0%
Contingency $ 2,248.652 $ 2.248.652 $ $ - $ 0%
TOTAL $ 15,391,000 $ 17,2D6,000 $ - $ 17,206,000 $ 3.960,948 $ 1.300.000 $ 5,260,948 $ 1.566.788 30%
Rtwo dbatengVormaVaudgel table
Form Revised 12/17198
i
PDC COMMMEE M 1RyDae n ea wov.
6/6/99 5/MJ99
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number I"Number
VDC99-27 13 f)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator. Dennis May, Principal Engineering Associate
SUBJECT: COMPUTERIZED RECORDS AND DRAWING SYSTEM,
JOB NO. J-25-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Computer Facility Integration
for development of Computerized Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1,
for a total not to exceed $2,303,683, and (2) Approve Professional Services
Agreement with FM International to provide technical and project management
assistance for Job No. J-25-1, for a total not to exceed $243,000.
SUMMARY
The District conducted a preliminary needs assessment for computerizing the
Engineering Department records in 1994. In June 1997, a District-wide Strategic
Information Plan (SIP)was completed. The SIP identified electronic document
management systems (EDMS) as the District's top information technology priority
for improving efficiency. A scope of work was completed in September 1998 for
implementation of an EDMS for the Engineering Department, including
development of computerized facility drawings(facility atlas) of Plants 1 and 2.
The EDMS will provide the District with an automated means of managing data,
managing Engineering Department work flow, referencing engineering data to
geographic locations, and tracking of record drawings which reflect plant facility
changes. Implementation of the EDMS and facility atlas will result in savings
from reduced design fees and construction change order costs.
Staff solicited Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from 30 firms for development
of the EDMS and facilities atlas. Nine SOQs were received with 21 firms
participating in various teams. Following the evaluation and ranking of the
SOQs, a Request for Proposals (RFP)was sent to the top three rated teams.
Proposals were received from all three teams. Based on the proposal
evaluation, interview process, and staff negotiations conducted in accordance
with Board Resolution No. OCSD 9", Staff recommends approval of a
Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for development of an EDMS and
facilities atlas with Computerized Facility Integration (CFI) for$2,303,683.
-1-
M M9 Wp9e^GBu,tl I.peMa fle{cb\IB�d QWN/.peNa Re{aMYb%J,mm 13 hx
R. bM99
r
Staff also recommends approval of a PSA with FM International to provide
technical oversight and to augment District staff in managing the project. FM
Intemational is well qualified for the task and was hired to assist Staff in
preparing the project scope of work. FM International will provide a level of
expertise and resources that are not available in the District's Engineering and
Information Technology (IT) Departments. The recommended PSA with FM
International is for $243,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Contract expenditures for the implementation phase of this project require
approval. The PSA amount and budget necessary for project implementation are
presented in the attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities 1.a)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The Budget Information Table line item for the Consultant's PSA shows $45,550
in the current project budget. The General Manager approved the original PSA
and the two addenda, for a total of$45,550. The cost breakdown for each is as
follows: Original PSA, $24,800; Addendum No. 1, $8,750; and Addendum No. 2,
$12,000.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
The District and its Consultant, Black and Veatch, conducted a preliminary needs
assessment for computerizing the Engineering Department records in 1994. The
project was placed on hold following the Orange County bankruptcy and has
recently been restarted.
The IT Department is currently developing a District-wide EDMS. The District-
wide EDMS was initiated in July 1997, as recommended in the District's Strategic
Information Plan (SIP), which was completed in June 1997. The SIP identified
EDMS as the District's top information technology priority for improving
efficiency. At present, IT is implementing a computerized work flow for Board
agenda reports using the same software (Filenet) that will be used for the
Engineering Department EDMS.
-2-
X A Wp Rvt %lMP WAge a Reryr4lTi93Lwn 13 EM
RexaeG Na609
y
A Scope of Work was completed in September 1998 for implementation of the
Engineering EDMS, including development of computerized facility drawings for
Plants 1 and 2. Implementation of the Engineering EDMS is being jointly
managed by the District's Engineering and IT Departments. This approach will
ensure integration between the Engineering EDMS and the District-wide system.
The benefit/cost analysis for the Engineering EDMS/facility atlas indicates that
the project investment will break even in 2002, and will result in a potential for
much greater savings in the future. The benefits are derived from reduced
control system and engineering design costs, as well as reduced construction
change order costs. The benefits are mostly the result of reduced effort required
to verify existing conditions.
Scope
The consultant will prepare the final design and implementation of the
Engineering EDMS. The EDMS will accommodate all documents used by
Engineering. Documents will be indexed for easy retrieval by all departments
(i.e., Engineering, Maintenance and Operations, etc.). The documents will be
stored as scanned images and as original electronic documents. Engineering
will be the first department at the District to have a fully implemented EDMS.
The consultant will also develop a computerized facility atlas of the treatment
plants showing the location of equipment, piping systems and other utilities. The
facility atlas is a geographic information system (GIS) that will allow access to
plant information from a visual map. Many types of information will be available
directly from the facility atlas such as equipment tag numbers, location and
description. The facility atlas can pass the user on to other systems such as
EDMS, Treatment Plant Reinvention Project plant design system (PDS), or the
Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to supplement
information in the facility atlas.
Tasks in the consultant PSA are summarized below:
• Acquire EDMS software
• Implement Engineering EDMS (Stage 1)
• Implement Engineering workflow system (Stage 2)
• Develop a detailed implementation plan for the facility atlas (Stage 3)
• Develop a detailed design document specifying work processes, user
interfaces and interfaces with the EDMS, PDS, CMMS and other systems
• Gather data for the facility atlas
• Implement the facility atlas in a prototype mode
-3-
H"G pwW MAp R�1Mp MAp RaptCf(9Wm 11.!s
A. Y
t
i
• Tailor the facility atlas to the Engineering Department
• Deploy the facility atlas throughout the Engineering Department
• Develop interfaces from the facility atlas to the EDMS, the PDS and the
CMMS
In addition to the PSA for the above work, Staff recommends award of a PSA to
FM International for$243.000 to provide technical assistance and oversight on
implementation of the EDMS.
FM International is able to provide skilled and experienced staff that will support
the District's staff to ensure a successful implementation of this project. Staff
does not have sufficient resources to support this project without outside
consultant help.
FM International has experience with implementing over 30 EDMS and workflow
systems in engineering offices. In addition, FM International staff has facility
atlas (GIS) experience as well as computerized maintenance management
system experience. FM International has experience with each aspect of the
project scope and has demonstrated an understanding of the engineering
operation and requirements specific to the District.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The EDMS and Facility Atlas PSA may be awarded to another team that
submitted a proposal.
2. Award no PSA. This alternative would result in continued inefficiencies that
occur with existing non-computerized Engineering work flow and records.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Staff Evaluation of Statements of Qualifications
3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Implement EDMS and Facility Atlas
DLM:jak:jo
H1wp.dtalagendalBoard Agenda Repoo[0999 Board Agenda RepodM599Utem 11doo
-4-
H1wp.pagOenMlB.vN Agenda Reec,lellM QmN Agenda Ragoaa dJGm 15.Ox
RemeeE'. 64KI18
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, May 12, 1999, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on May 12, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Toby Weissen, Carollo Engineers
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Don Hughes
Shawn Boyd Ryal Wheeler
Shirley McCracken
James W. Silva STAFF PRESENT:
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair
John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Dan McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
John M. Gullixson Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Mark A. Murphy Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
Mike While, Controller
Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager
Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
OCSD • P.O.Box 6127 • Fountain Valley.CA 9272M 127 . (714) 962-2411
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 2
May 12, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the workshop held on
April 10, 1999, and the minutes of the April 14, 1999 Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee meeting.
Director Shirley McCracken abstained.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager had no report.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager had no report.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
The Director of Finance had no report.
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources Mike Peterman had no report.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, briefly reported on media activity at the
District.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff had no report.
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A - E)
A. FAHR99-29: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
April 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee
meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in
conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
May 12, 1999
B. FAHR99-30: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report.
C. FAHR99-31: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of April 21. 1999.
D. FAHR99-32: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program
Report for the period January 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999,
E. FAHR99-33: Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report
for the period ending March 31, 1999.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items
specified as 12(A) through 12(E) under Consent Calendar.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (ITEM A)
A. FAHR99-34: Authorize the selection of anew Medical Insurance Company to
replace United HealthCare's Point-of-Service Plan and PacifiCare's Health
Maintenance Organization Plan effective July 1, 1999.
Motion: Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried, to defer this item for
consideration with other items in closed session as Agenda Item No. 19.
Motion: Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried, to add Agenda Item
No. 13A to Closed Session, as new Agenda Item No. 19A(2), pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.2(b), which matter needs immediate attention
and arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: Labor Negotiations
Meet and Confer, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6.
Motion: Moved, seconded, and unanimously carried to go out of order and into
Closed Session.
(19) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item
No. 19A(1) on the published Agenda, and Item No. 13A, as added to the Closed Session Agenda
as Item No. 19A(2). The Committee convened in Closed Session at 5:19 p.m.
At 6:07 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. It was moved, seconded, and duly
carried to approve the recommendation of the Staff contained in Report FAHR99-34, Agenda
Item No. 13A, relating to selection of a new medical insurance plan.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 4
May 12, 1999
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly
reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 19A(1).
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items B-D)
B. FAHR99-35: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD 99-09, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for a Comprehensive
Capital Facilities Connection Charge Program.
Motion: Moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve Staffs recommendation
that a new comprehensive Connection Fee Program and Ordinance, containing
elements as outlined by Staff, be adopted.
C. FAHR99-36: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99- urging the California Legislature
to modify the "County Sanitation District Act'to increase the maximum monthly
compensation allowed for Directors.
Motion: Moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve Staffs recommendation,
amending the Resolution, under the same or similar provisions as allowed for
Directors of Water Districts and Utility Districts.
D. FAHR99-37: Approve expanding the District's Computer Financial Assistance
Program to Directors, providing for a maximum loan of$3,000; 10% down
payment; 24 months repayment period; interest rate at 5%; and no increase in the
aggregate maximum loan fund of$150,000.
There was extended discussion among the Directors, including the noting of a
lack of necessity for such a Program. No action was taken, and the Chair directed
Staff to remove it from the pending issues list.
(14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION
There were no informational presentations
(15) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 5
May 12, 1999
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 9, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:10 p.m.
Sub itled by:
7w
Penny M. Ole
FAHR Committee S retary
H:1wp.d1a1a9andaWAHR%Fahr99199m'nsW51299 MM.dac
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Connection Fee
Structure
MN
May 26, 1999
Objectives
♦ Review of financial rates and charges
♦ Understand connection fee
methodology
♦ Understand key issues / assumptions
♦ Understand new connection fee
policies
i
f�
,Ke` Decisions
♦Continue capital investment
equalization method
♦ Assign wet weather facility costs
to residential development
♦ Assign tiered fees for MFR and SFR
based upon bedrooms
♦ Assign low, average and high
demand commercial fees
Decisions
♦ Allow SIUs to pay-as-they-use
♦ Charge for all governmental uses
♦ Remove time limit for demolished
facilities with proof of payment
♦ Review fee and method routinely
♦ Phase-in plan for high demand uses
2
Background Review
`Existing Cost of Service
i 6sophy
Use of Funds Source of Funds
♦ Operation and ♦ Existing Users
maintenance of
existing facilities
♦ Capital replacement ♦ All Users
and improvement
of existing facilities
♦ Capital construction ♦ New Users
to accommodate
growth (capacity)
3
`E fisting and New Users are
NS
Gr d uped into S Categories for Rates
Charges
User Sewer Service Connection
Category Charge Fee
Residential X X
Commercial X X
Industrial X X
Local Gov't X
State & Federal X X
Connection Fees Reduce the
Monthly Charge to Existing Users
Connection
Fee
User
Charge
4
!'-"*hat's Changed From the
`2` , 0 Master Plan
Item 2020 Plan Strategic Plan
Planning Horizon 30 yrs 20 yrs
CIP Budget $1.48 billion $1.51 billion
Projected Flow 399 MGD 352 MGD
Flow per Household 399 gpd 260 gpd
Number of Connections 1,000,000 1,354,000
Flow per 1,000 sq It 80 gal 150 gal
for Commercial Users (20%) (58%)
Residential Connection Fee
Comparison
Connection Fee($)
Agency $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000
Riverside 2,604
OCSD(Existing) 2,360
Sacramento
Walnut Creek
San Diego
Los Angeles(County)
San Jose
Oakland
Los Angeles(City) 141
Phoenix ❑ District
San Francisco 0 ❑ Local Agency
5
,Iladustrial Connection Fee
N Co parison for a High Strength
il dustrial User
Agency Connection Fee (Mill11 ions of Dollars)
EE
Concord 2.5
Sacramento 1 1.8
San Diego 1.5
Los Angeles(County) 1.2
0.65 Based
Oakland • Flow 15 150,000 gptl
San Jose 0.71 . Boo 1,090 mg/L
Los Angeles(City) 0.71 . TSS 270 malt.
OCSD(Existing) Lr44s1 _ :1.6 . 130,000 sq It of
Riverside 0.057 Improved building
area
Phoenix 0.000
Sen Francisco 0 -"' Rescinded Excess Capacity Charge
Industrial Connection Fee
Co",piparisonfor a Low Strength
dustrial User
Agency
Connection Fee(Millions of Dollars)
Ei 2 SE
Concord 1.6
San Diego 1.5
Sacramento 1.0
Los Angeles(County) 0.76
Oakland 0.58 Based on:
San Jose 0.55 . Flow 150,000 gptl
. Boo 050 mglL
Los Angeles(City) 0.62 . TSS 270 mgd.
OCSD(Existing) _�9g11____; 0.99 . 100,000 act R of
Riverside 0.057 Improved building
area
Phoenix 0
.000
San Francisco 0 I--- Rescinded Excess Capacity Charge
6
E Highlights of RAC Recommendations
�♦ "Pay for what you use"
♦ Consider "pay as you go"
♦ Consider tiered residential rates
and fees
♦ Reduce up-front costs
Connection Fee
Methodology
'Aiding Philosophy of Alternative
& nection Fee Methods
Method Guiding Philosophy
Existing Method "All users past, present and
future pay the same"
Alternative "All users from now on pay
the same"
Existing "Capital Investment
�\Equalization" Method
rReplacement Value + rCost of New
of Existing Facilities L Facilities
Fee =
Existing + New
Connections * ]
*Single Family Residential equivalents
8
Capital Cost Items are Allocated to
Ne Users Based on Connection
e Method
Connection Fee
Capital Cost Item Cost Method
$ in Million CIE Alternative
"Buy-in" Cost $ 110 — ?
Existing Facilities 763 ✓ —
Additional Capacity 514 ✓ ✓
GWR System 121 ✓ ?
Cooperative Projects 154 ✓ ?
Replacement/ 727 ✓ —
Improvement'
Includes Support Facilities
Existing Capital Investment
Equalization Fee Method
$ in Millions
Capital Cost Item 2020 Strategic
Master Plan Plan
Existing Facilities $ 777 $ 763
Additional Capacity 886 514
GWR System (Reclamation) 77 121
Cooperative Projects — 154
Replacement/ Improvement 519 727
Total Capital Requirements $2,259 $ 2,279
Number of Existing
and New Users/ EDUs 1,000,000 1,354.000
Average Cost Per EDU $ 2,266 $ 11,680
9
Ali' native Connection Fee Method
$ in Millions
Capital Cost Item
On-Site Regional Total
"Buy-in" Cost — $ 110 $ 110
Additional Capacity $ 514 514 514
GWR System — 121 121
Cooperative Projects — — 154
Improved Treatment — — 48
Total Capital Requirements $ 514 $ 745 $ 947
Number of New EDUs 442,000 442,000 442,000
Average Cost Per EDU $ 1,165 $ 1,690 $ 2,145
Key Issues
10
Key Issues and Recommendations
IZ Connection Fees for Government Agencies
0 How to Charge for New
Non-Residential Connections
0 Tiered Residential Connection Fees
• Impact of Wet Weather
• Credit for Demolished Facilities
Governmental Agencies —
\E.xisting
♦ State and federal agencies included
♦ Local agencies excluded
♦ Schools
♦ Cities
♦ County
♦ Revenue Area 13 is exception
n
Governmental Agencies —
Sposal
♦ Include state and federal agencies
♦ Include regional or county facilities
♦ Include local agencies
♦ Not charging government agencies
may violate Prop. 218
♦ Not charging government agencies
burdens local ratepayer
Options Considered for
��i-Residential Connection Fees
♦ Unimproved property acreage
♦ Size of sewer lateral
♦ 125t land use codes
♦ Simplification to combine land use
codes into similar flow and strength
categories
♦ Simplification to "high, average and
low demand" commercial categories
12
Reecommended Approach for
N -Residential Connection Fees
Pays Unit Billing
Component For Charge Method
"Basic Fee" Average $ / 1000 One-
Use sq ft Time
Flow / Strength High $ for Annual
Factor Demand Q, BOD, User
Connection TSS Fee
Advantages of Recommended
Connection Fee Method
♦ Fair to all users, who "pay for what
they use"
♦ Easy to understand, explain and
administer
♦ Conforms to RAC input to consider
commercial / industry incentives by
reducing up-front charges
13
We Weather Adjustment
�♦ Flows increase during wet weather
♦ Inflow
♦ Infiltration
♦ Amount of increase is proportional to sewers
♦ Residential laterals are 55% of sewer length
♦ Local sewers are 40% of sewer length
♦ Residential connection fees should pay
for wet weather capacity
Impact of Wet Weather
'N.A,.djustment
♦ Wet weather facilities are all flow related
♦ Flow related facilities are $1.1 billion
at 2020
♦ Wet weather facilities increase Single
Family Residential (SFR) fees $140
to $1 ,820 total
♦ Non-Residential fee range decreases
proportionately to $675 1 1 ,000 sq ft
14
ed Residential Connection Fee
Number of Relationships to 1 EDU
Bedrooms SFR MFR
0 0.32
1 0.62 0.50
2 0.81 0.70
3 1.00 0.89
4 1.19 1.08
5+ 1 .39
~ mmary of Proposed and Existing
ir
Residential Connection Fees
User Category Proposed Existing
Single-Family Residential
5+ BDR House $ 2,530
4 BDR House 2,165
3 BDR House 1,820 $ 2,360
2 BDR House 1,475
1 BDR House 1,130
Multi-Family Residential
4+ BDR Apartment $ 1,965
3 BDR Apartment 1.620
2 BDR Apartment 1,275 $ 2,360
1 BDR Apartment 910
Studio Apartment 580
15
Rgduce Up-Front Fees
♦ One-time fees are based on estimates
♦ Cash flow does not match production
♦ Currently 800 significant industrial /
commercial users (SIUs)
♦ RAC and Business Council concerned
♦ Reduction would reduce "move-in" costs
Payment Over Time
�♦ SIU user fees based on actual use
♦ Add connection fee component for above
average demand
♦ Allocate 2020 asset values to flow,
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),
suspended solids (SS)
♦ Determine 2020 plant loading
♦ Allocate unit cost for 30-year useful life
♦ Assign time value to money
16
Summary of Proposed and Existing
\Nli-Residential Connection Fees
Proposed OCSD
Typical Industrial / Base Rate Current
Commercial User (1,000 sq ft) Rate
Low Demand $ 110 S 472
Average Demand 675 472
High Demand 1,600 472
Summary of Proposed and
Existing Non-Residential
Connection Fees
Low Demand High Demand
Connections Connections
Nurseries Restaurants
Warehouses Supermarkets
Parking Structures Car Washes
RV Storage Coin Laundry
Churches Amusement Parks
Truck Terminals Shopping Centers
RV Parks with Restaurants
Lumber/Construction
Yards
17
FExample Over Time
Base Annual
Quantity Fee Fee @ 5% 30 Years
130,000 sq it $ 87,750 $ 87,750
150,000 gal /dy $ 26,200 786,000
1,090 mg /L BOD 64,000 1,920,000
270 mg/L SS 11,000 330,000
Total $ 87,750 1 $ 101,200 $ 3,123,750
Compare Flow& Strength Based $ 1,891,914
One-Time Fee
jelpl'.. arison of Existing and Proposed
mercial Connection Fees
$1 4 000
13,000
13,600 13.80 0 Propose d
O Existing
One•Tlme 2,000
Connec8on
Fe
$11,000eft 1,800 1,600
1,000 6 75 472 472 472 472
350
191 88 t10 134
0
Restaurant Car Wash Warehouse Of re Bldg
18
ft dit for Demolished
10
uctures.W-1-
♦ Existing policy
♦ Application within 2 years of demolition
♦ Credit at current rates
♦ Fee for additional demand
♦ Alternative policies
♦ Extend time period for application
♦ Remove time limit
♦ Require proof of prior payments
♦ District has no records
C
ommendations
IA
♦ Continue capital investment
equalization method
♦ Assign wet weather facility costs
to residential development
♦ Assign tiered fees for MFR. and SFR
based upon bedrooms
♦ Assign low, average and high
demand commercial fees
19
ommendations
♦ Allow SIUs to pay-as-they-use
♦ Charge for all governmental uses
♦ Remove time limit for demolished
facilities with proof of payment
♦ Review fee and method routinely
♦ Phase-in plan for high demand uses
t Steps
Rl FAHR Committee May 12
0 Board Meeting, Consensus May 26
❑ Develop Prop. 218 Mail-out June 5
❑ First Reading June 23
❑ Public Hearing July 21
❑ Second Reading July 21
❑ New Connection Fees Effective Sept. 1
20
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Da T°" �
05/12/99 05126/899
AGENDA REPORT Iem Number 1GVR_yuyC
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
April 1999
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by
differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
C RFMNTREPAPTlAe�l90x
Rp W 1N1707 Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of April 1999 is attached. The
attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements
for the next six months.
During the month of April, the District received approximately $22 million through
the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. The funds were
deposited in LAIF to be available to meet current and projected cash flow
requirements.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts AprII30, 1999 Yield(°k)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 29,815,784 5.1
Union Bank Checking Account 3,037,771 —
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3,039,357 4.0
PIMCO—Short-tens Portfolio 18,599.656 5.9
PIMCO—Long-term Portfolio 302,500,725 4.5
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 7,841 5.1
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,196,818 6.3
Petty Cash 4.400 —
TOTAL $389,202,352
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SK:lc
G\TEM%TnFIAPTJAryBB.6ac
Rew IWIM Page 2
ReportMonthly Treasurer's
District Fund Balances
!.... !.... !.... ..... ..... :....
!.... :.... :.... ..... !.... !....
1
..... :.... !.... ..... !.... !....
■
El Bank
Dist 11 GO Bond Fund
G:\excel.dta\ftn\2220\gegg!\FinanmVnonthly treasurers report
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(far the month ending 30 April 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies (603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
ap�le� $19,599,656
Mellon0 518,599,656
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $18,670,719
Mellon $18,670,722
15.11 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.29
Of Index: 0.20
15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: S54,789
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 56%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: °AA+°
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: 0.41 0.37
3 Months: 1.17 1.09
12 Months: 5.40 2.22
Year-to-Date: 1.58 1.47
H:L_WW,INCL1rt0WOZ4KMMPLEUQ"99.W
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 April 1999)
Long-Term Operating Monies (103)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
p�M $302,917,502
Mello $302,500,725
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $304,905,185
Mellon $305,017,547
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.39
Of Index: 2.33
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change: $7,331,412
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 8%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(°/9) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: 0.32 0.33
3 Months: 0.22 0.24
12 Months: 6.59 6.29
Year-to-Date: 0.75 0.75
H.L.WINANCEQIOWOVE MPLEL."499..EPT
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USDA
30-APR-1999 HBIIOG
8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ________ ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,662,402.09 2,662,402.09 14.09% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2,816,196.89 2,816,196.89 14.91% 0.00 0.00 O.OD
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR .1,383,624.67 1,383,624.67 7.32% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 94,488.28 94,488.28 0.50% 0.00 4,307.34 4.56
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6,956,711.93 6,956,711.93 36.83% 0.00 4,307.34 0.06
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,301,023.00 17.48% -24,242.63 210,375.00 6.37
U.S. AGENCIES 3,699,104.60 3,686,125.00 19.51% -12,979.60 178,895.00 4.85
BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,409,385.50 2,387,852.00 12.64% -21,533.50 202,250.00 8.47
INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 857,165.50 4.54% -6,587.50 60,562.50 7.07
UTILITY - ELECTRIC 1,416,501.00 1,410,779.00 7.47% -5,722.00 105,700.00 7.49
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 11,714,009.73 11,642,944.50 61.64% -71,065.23 757,782.50 6.51
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 289,556.23 209,556.23 1.53% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 289,556.23 289,556.23 1.53% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------- ---------------= -------- ----------------- ---------------- -
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,960,277.89 18,BB9,212.66 100.00% -71,065.23 762,089.84 4.03
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
30-APR-1999 HB1100
4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 400.00 400.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
RECEIVABLES 83,351.50 83,351.50 0.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -22,909,019.80 -22,909,019.80 -7.48% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 12,364,712.42 12,364,712.42 4.04% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 1,059,411.59 1,059,411.59 0.35% 0.00 48,294.27 4.56
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS -9,401,144.29 -9,401,144.29 -3.07% 0.00 48,294.27 -0.51
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 130,373,755.60 129,234,988.35 42.17% -1,138,767.25 9,203,780.09 6.35
U.S. AGENCIES 55,295,619.70 54,763,797.25 17.871 -531,821.45 3,431,783.12 6.27
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 10,385,156.25 10,432,695.00 3.40% 47,538.75 602,500.00 6.54'
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,726,045.12 4,701,758.22 1.53% -24,286.90 321,021.59 6.93
FHLMC POOLS 11,776,840.87 11,653,521.04 3.801 -123,319.83 811,696.11 6.97
FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,711,184.96 6,751,595.92 2.20% 40,410.96 423,731.91 6.28
FNMA POOLS 4,255,043.75 4,251,150.00 1.39% -3,893.75 245,847.60 5.78
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 173,880.19 174,639.71 0.06% 759.52 10,780.57 6.17
OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 3,995,792.99 4,020,314.97 1.31% 24,521.90 231,000.18 5.75
MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 997,430.00 0.33% -2,570.00 62,000.00 6.22
BANKING 6 FINANCE 61,039,178.40 60,925,513.12 19.881 -113,665.29 3,647,660.23 5.99
INDUSTRIAL 15,037,689.00 14,321,080.90 4.671 -716,608.10 1,162,527.00 8.12
UTILITY - ELECTRIC 2,151,250.00 2,123,060.00 0.69% -28,190.00 164,000.00 7.72
UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,550,325.00 2.46% 53,070.00 450,000.00 5.96
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 314,418,690.83 311,901,869.48 101.79% -2,516,821.35. 19,848,329.40 6.36
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,930,262.87 3,930,262.87 1.28% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,930,262.87 3,930,262.07 1.28% ' 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................. .................. ........ ................. ................ -------
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 308,947,809.41 306,430,988.06 100.00% -2,516,821.35 19,896,622.67 6.49
Page 1
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIN PAGE 1
MSF07511102 1999/04/30 RON DATE 05/06/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM 10.17.50
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ R TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD "TING PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
94,489.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGMT .000 4.559 AAA 100.000 94,488.28 1.35
196085247 94,48R.29 .51
400,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN N1'G CORP DISC 4.066 .000 P-1 9R.616 394,464.44 5.62
313396FTS NAT 05/18/1999 394,464.44 2.12
200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.042 .000 P-1 99.133 198,266.67 2.65
19121ETB9 06/12/1999 198,266.67 1.02
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 98.260 880,940.00 12.22
36959JS53 05/05/1999 888,840.00 4.20
700,000.00 ISAR CAP CORP DISC 4.822 .ODO P-1 99.128 693,895.42 9.92
90328BTB2 06/21/1999 693,895.42 3.23
900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 4.901 .00D P-1 92.933 081,400.00 12.66
61166BWO 09/23/1999 801,400.00 4.24
1,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 5.022 .000 P-1 98.930 1,303,624.67 19.98
313588GA2 HAT OS/25/1999 1,383,624.67 7.44
2,45D,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN KEG CORP DISC 38.201 .000 P-1 98.846 2,421,732.45 34.81
313396FDO NET 05/04/1999 2,421,732.45 13.02
_____ _ _________________ ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 0.283 .124 6,956,711.93 100.00
6,956,711.93 32.41
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CONS BDS 4.860 4.853 AAA 99.625 3,699,104.60 31.65
3133M2EN2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO 01/29/99 3,686,125.00 19.92
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF HTG 5.001 2.888 AA3 101.416 511,200.00 4.35
264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 507,080.00 2.23
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.298 Al 103.532 529,010.00 4.44
131205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 517,660.00 2.28
050,000.DO PHILLIP HORRIG CO INC NTS 5.256 :.06L A:. 100.843 863,753.00 2.36
218154BA4 2.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 857,165.50 4.61
YLDANA. YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2
CCSFO7511302 1999/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/06/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 10.17.50
PAR VALUE ITN AT CURRENT OVALITY NAMUST TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD RATING PRICE MERIT VALUE I TOTAL
900,000.00 GENERAL MAN ACCEP CORP ME 5.305 6.207 A2 100.690 909,657.00 7.78
3I042N7G2 6.250I O1/11/2000 DD O1/11/94 906,210.00 4.87
300,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC STS 5.363 7.563 A2 100.815 303,930.00 2.59
OI3902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DD 09/21/94 302,445.00 1.63
150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP HT 5.364 9.647 At IA1.068 151,663.50 1.30
1I3034DO9 9.750% 08/01/1999 151,602.00 .82
900,000.00 LONG ISLAND I% CO DEB 5.419 9.270 BM3 100.411 905,301.00 7.76
542671CK6 7.300% 07/15/1999 DD 07f2l/92 903,699.00 4.86
3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES S.S85 6.333 AAA 100.031 3,325,265.63 29.35
912027272 06.375% OS/15/1999 DD 05/1S/96 3,301,023.00 13.75
500,000.00 TEAR SAMRICA FIN ME 4SB00110 5.653 8.285 A3 101.997 515,125.00 4.37
893SOMPI 8.450% O1/1212000 DD O1/12195 509,935.00 2.74
________ _______ _________________ --------
TOTAL PILED INCOM SECURITIES 5.067 5.190 11,714,009.73 100.00
11,642,944.50 62.61
TOTAL 5.995 4.856 18,670,721.66 100.00
18,599,656.43 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSF07522202 1999/04/30 RUN DATE 05/06/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIM 10.17.50
PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 0 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
1,059,411.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE WHY .000 4.559 AAA 100.000 1,059,511.59 3.89
996085247 1,059,411.59 .33
900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACKS LP DISC 4.823 .00D P-1 99.321 893,892.75 6.65
38142UTB8 06/11/1999 R93,892.75 .23
3,400,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 4.640 .000 P-1 98.352 7,307,639.71 54.43
34539UUS9 07/26/1999 7,307,639.71 2.25
300,000.00 DU PONT DE MBMDUR DISC 4.943 .000 P-1 99.027 297,O80.00 2.21
26354BT44 06/04/1599 297,080.00 .09
900,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 4.855 .000 P-1 99.038 891,702.75 6.64
26354BSR4 05/25/1999 091,702.75 .27
1,300,800.DO FORD KIM CR CO DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 99.383 1,291,936.83 9.62
34539USM5 05/21/2999 1,291,976.83 .40
1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 4.968 .000 P-1 99.023 1,297,293.94 9.58
63743DTB3 06/11/1999 1,207,293.94 .40
400,000.00 IBM DISC 4.839 .000 P-1 98.302 395,126.44 2.94
45920ETR3 06/25/1999 395,126.44 .12
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 4.260 .548 13,424,124.01 100.00
13,424,124.01 4.13
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL HT .000 5.853 A2 98.948 1,992,B00.00 .63
066365OM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 11978,960.00 .61
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN KIN .000 5.013 Al 99.890 3,490,635.00 1.12
17120QEBD FLTG AT O8/09/2002 DO 04/08/98 3,496,150.00 1.03
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.115 Al 99.381 1,998,613.60 .63
345397WB FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/90 1,995,620.00 .61
3,950,DOD.00 GENERAL MOBS ACCEP CORD NTE .000 5.543 A2 99.340 3,910,760.50 1.25
370425QVS FLTG AT O0/18/2003 DD O0/17/98 3,924,246.00 1.21
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 4
O[SP07522202 1999/04/30 RUN DATE 05/06/95
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.17.50
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE HARNEY VALUE 6 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ----------
4,000,000.00 HELLER FINE, MN .000 5.226 A3 100.265 4,000,000.00 1.28
42333HON3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/99 4,010,600.00 1.23
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINE, MTN 6TR 00246 .000 5.246 A3 100.214 3,000,000.00 .96
42333RLF3 PLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 3,006,420.00 .92
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 5.945 A2 100.034 4,OOO,000.00 1.28
44181KZAS FLED AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 4,001,360.00 1.23
1,000,000.00 HOU5E80LD FIN MIN SR 100530 .000 5.945 A2 99.932 999,188.90 .32
44181RET4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 999,720.00 .31
4,041,736.17 STUDENT LN M W ASSN 1997-1 Al .000 5.346 AAA 99.430 3,995,792.99 1.28
30442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,020,314.97 1.24
7,189,630.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.659 3.639 AAA 99.625 7,166,473.77 2.29
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 3,162,668.89 2.20
10,302,400.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.728 3.499 AAA 96.469 10,103,375.00 3.21
9128232M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 10,015,797.46 3.08
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 6.096 AAA 102.703 9,034,223.67 2.39
912027266 06.2501 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/91 8,729,755.00 2.68
19,000,000.00 FEDERAL. NAIL RIG ASSN MTN 4.943 6.470 AAA 103.094 20,012,510.00 6.28
31364CSY3 6.690% 03/23/2002 DO 03/27/97 19,587,860.00 6.02
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY HER STR 00299 5.130 5.148 AA3 100.031 6,996,129.00 2.24
61745ENLI FLTG AT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 3,002,130.0O 2.15
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 9.125 AAA 121.922 9,233,593.75 1.95
912810DES 11.125% 09/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,096,100.00 1.87
31,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.203 AAA 102.773 32,509,817.31 10.37
912923E54 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/91 32,373,495.00 9.95
I3,lO0,OOO.OD U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 3.103 AM 105.531 18,388,684.02 5.38
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 19,045,BD1.D0 5.55
5,500,000.00 U 6 TREASURY NOTES 5.402 6.060 AAA 103.141 S,677.682.23 1.01
9128273GS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 5,672,755.00 1.34
8,500,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.533 5.336 AAA 101.906 8,865.156.26 2.63
9128272SO D6.6254 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/93 0,932,010.00 2.31
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSP00522202 1999/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/06/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.27.50
PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.428 AAA 125.953 6,690,250.00 2.09
912810MO 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 1D/05/83 6,549,556.00 2.01
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORD N A SR NTS 5.650 6.382 AA3 101.841 1,543,215.00 .49
046003HYB 1.500% 07/15/2002 DO 01/11/97 1,527,615.00 .40
4,230,OOD.00 COMMIT TO PUN FNMA SE HTG 5.736 5.793 AAA 100.500 4,255r043.75 1.36
1IF011651 VAR RT 05/25/2029 4,251,150.00 1.31
11000,0UD.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.065 A3 99.740 999,730.00 .31
42312HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/99 997,400.00 .31
16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.O93 6.203 AAA 103.625 16,581,067.03 5.34
9120272WI 06.5001 OS/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 16,683,625.00 5.13
2,005,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.904 6.461 A2 101.218 2,060,739.00 .65
8124DOGM6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 2,029,420.90 .62
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.081 AAA 102.781 5,086,402.25 1.64
91282721,5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 5,139,050.00 1.58
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 5.849 6.528 A2 101.562 3,O73,170.OD .9I
81240QJAI 6.630% 00/09/20D2 DD 07/09/97 3,046,86D.00 .94
14,I50,OOO.DO FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN MIN 5.882 5.917 AAA 96.500 14,560,462.50 4.56
31364GLD9 5.010% 12/15/2008 DD 12/15/98 14,233,750.00 4.38
6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C HTN 5.882 5.844 AA1 100.109 5,996,400.00 1.92
63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6,006,540.00 1.05
936,245.10 FHLMC MULTICL MSG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.883 100.281 934,928.50 .30
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 938,875.95 .29
1,144,085.15 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.894 AAA 100.096 1,141,716.55 .36
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 3,145,183.47 .35
2,500,ODO.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.287 AA 101.399 2,526,725.OD .81
59018SEP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 2,534,975.00 .08
7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.960 AAA 100.671 7,497,255.00 2.42
0I986IAK5 6.ODOB 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 7,550,325.00 2.32
1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP "IS 6.032 6.939 A2 102.678 1,283,062.50 .41
3704250FO 0.125% 05101/20DI DD 05/01/97 1,203,475.00 .39
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSF01522202 1995/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/06/95
ORANGE CTY-WNG TERM OPERATING RUN TIM 10.17.50
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 6.046 6.586 A2 101.734 1,018,520.00 .32
33042MGK1 6.7004 04/30/2001 DD 04/25/96 1,017,340.00 .31
2,000,000.00 BANABOSTON CORD SR NTS 6.133 6.103 A2 100.292 1,999,600.00 .64
06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2UO2 DD 03/12/99 2,005,840.00 .62
173,880.20 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.133 AAA 100.437 173,880.19 .05
316)7EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 174,639.71 .05
1,000,000.DO POPULAR INC MTN CTR 00004 6.201 6.216 A3 99.743 1,000,000.00 .31
73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 997,430.00 .31
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA I SF 6.212 6.195 AAA 96.859 6,095,703.13 1.94
O1N060650 6.000E 05/15/2029 6,053,683.50 1.86
2,500,000.00 LEHMAN ERGS ELDON MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.359 EAA1 100.639 2,509,175.00 .80
52517PLM1 6.400% O8/30/20DO DO 09/26/97 2,515,975.00 .37
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MID ASSN MTN 6.291 6.115 AAA 101.875 4,488,705.00 1.46
31364CWS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,584,375.00 1.41
3,771,243.68 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.276 AAA 100.331 3,775,368.46 1.21
3133WE95 6.3244 08/15/2032 3,800,319.97 1.17
2,OOD,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.615 A2 102.041 2,031,960.00 .65
073902ANI 6.75D6 04/15/2003 2,040,820.00 .63
5,D00,000.00 LEHMAN BIOS HLOGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.591 BAA1 100.890 5,D39,450.OD 1.61
52512PJD4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/O6/16 5,044,500.00 1.55
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.638 A2 101.693 1,317,619.35 .42
073902AWO 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 1,327,093.65 .41
10,500,000.DD COMMIT TO PUS GNNA SF HIS 6.478 6.542 AAA 99.359 10,385,156.25 3.34
OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 ]0,432,695.00 3.21
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.496 6.460 HAS, 100.620 2,000,888.00 .64
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 2,012,400.00 .62
2,281,802.01 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF HER 1620E 6.550 6.460 AAA 92.972 2,125,662.07 .67
3133T13A4 6.DOO8 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 2,119,164.75 .65
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL RATE, MTG ASSN MTN 6.533 6.475 AAA 102.312 8,012,576.00 2.62
31364CED9 6.625% 04/10/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,184,960.00 2.52
YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSM7522202 1999/04/30 RUN DATE 05/06/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 1D.19.50
PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT QUALITY RAPIST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD RATING PRICE MERRY VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
9,000,000.00 PBILIP NORAIS COS NT 6.593 9.005 A2 102.720 9,903,700.00 2.96
718154082 9.250% 02/15/2000 9,244,800.00 2.84
11,595,658.70 EVEM GROUP IGS-0426 6.629 6.965 AAA 100.499 11,136,840.87 3.73
3128OMSS 3.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 11,653,521.04 3.58
3,000,000.00 G N A C RED TERN SYS 6.660 8.446 A3 102.117 3,227,070.00 .90
37042RAQ4 8.6251 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,063,510.00 .94
2,730,244.04 OEM IT POOL 0080089H 6.705 6.804 AAA 101.047 2,789,968.95 .80
36225=20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 2,750,830.50 .85
1,904,532.35 CNNA II POOL /0080023 6.869 6.062 MR 102.016 1,936,076.17 .62
36225CA89 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 1,942,920.72 .6D
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.419 AAA 153.335 4,029,030.31 1.26
912830W4 13.250% 05/13/2014 DO 05/15/84 3,934,375.00 1.21
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.513 7.725 BRA3 106.153 2,152,250.00 .68
542671CT3 8.2006 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 2,123,060.00 .65
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCORE SECURITIES 4.550 6.130 314,418,690.83 100.00
311,901,869.48 95.87
TOTAL 4.548 6.090 327,842,814.84 100.00
325,325,993.49 100.00
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/- COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
------------------------------------""---------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 07-APR-1999 -198,266.67 -198,266.67 99.133335
19121ETB9 06/11/1999 07-APR-1999 198,266.67 198,266.67 99.133335
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 07-APR-1999 -198,266.67 -198,266.67 99.133335
19121ETB9 06/11/1999 07-APR-1999 -198,266.67 0.00 99.133335
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-APR-1999 -1,291,976.83 -1,291,976.83 99.382833
34539USM5 05/21/1999 05-APR-1999 1,291,976.83 1,291,976.83 99.382833
B CITIBANK CP IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-APR-1999 -1,291,976.83 -1,291,976.83 99.382833
34539USM5 05/21/1999 05-APR-1999 -1,291,976.83 0.00 99.382833
PC CITIBANK CP IPA, NEW YORK 05-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,400,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-APR-1999 -7,307,639.71 -7,307,639.71 98.751888
34539UUS9 07/26/1999 23-APR-1999 7,307,639.71 7,307,639.71 98.751888
B CITIBANK CP IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,400,000.00 FORD MTR CR 00 DISC 23-APR-1999 -7,307,639.71 -7,307,639.71 98.751888
34539UUS9 07/26/1999 23-APR-1999 -7,307,639.71 0.00 98.751888
FC CITIBANK CP IPA, NEW YORK 23-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 21-APR-1999 -893,892.75 -893,892.75 99.321416
38142U7BB 06/11/1999 21-APR-1999 893,892.75 893,892.75 99.321416
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GOLD14AN SACHS LP DISC 21-APR-1999 -893,892.75 -893,892.75 99.321416
38142UTBO 06/11/1999 21-APR-1999 -093,892.75 0.00 99.321416
Page 1
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
------`------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 20-APR-1999 -881,400.00 -881,400.00 97.933333
61166BWP8 09/23/1999 21-APR-1999 881,400.00 881,400.00 97.933333
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 20-APR-1999 -881,400.00 -881,400.00 97.933333
61166BWP8 09/23/1999 21-APR-1999 -881,400.00 0.00 97.933333
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 07-APR-1999 -693,895.42 -693,895.42 99.127917
9032OBT57 06/11/1999 07-APR-1999 693,895.42 693,895.42 99.127917
e GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 07-APR-1999 -693,895.42 -693,895.42 99.127917
90328BTB7 06/11/1999 07-APR-1999 -693,895.42 0.00 99.127917
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
28,481.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-APR-1999 -28,481.21 -28,481.21 1.000000
996085247 01-APR-1999 28,481.21 28,481.21 1.000000
e ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
28,481.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HUNT O1-APR-1999 -28,481.21 -28,481.21 1.000000
996085247 01-APR-1999 -28,481.21 0.00 1.000000
PC D1-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
244,356.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-APR-1999 -244,356.02 -244,356.02 1.000000
996085247 01-APR-1999 244,356.02 244,356.02 1.000000
e ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
244,356.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-APR-1999 -244,356.02 -244,356.02 1.000000
Page 2
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IMV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
996085247 01-APR-1999 -244,356.02 0.00 1.000000
PC O1-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-APR-1999 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000
996085247 07-APR-1999 175,500.00 175,500.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-APR-1999 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000
996085247 07-APR-1999 -175,500.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
7,837.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-APR-1999 -7,837.91 -7,837.91 1.000000
996085247 07-APR-1999 7,837.91 7,837.91 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
7,837.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-APR-1999 -7,837.91 -7,837.91 1.000000
996085247 07-APR-1999 -7,837.91 0.00 1.000000
PC 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
33,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-APR-1999 -33,125.00 -33,125.00 1.000000
996085247 15-APR-1999 33,125.00 33,125.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
33,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-APR-1999 -33,125.00 -33,125.00 1.000000
996085247 15-APR-1999 -33,125.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,167,650.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-APR-1999 -1,167,650.52 -1,167,650.52 1.000000
996085247 15-APR-1999 1,167,650.52 1,167,650.52 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 3
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
1,167,650.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-APR-1999 -1,167,650.52 -1,167,650.52 1.000000
996085247 15-APR-1999 -1,167,650.52 0.00 1.000000
PC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
78,883.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-APR-1999 -78,883.00 -78,883.00 1.000000
996085247 16-APR-1999 78,883.00 78,883.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
78,883.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-APR-1999 -78,883.00 -78,883.00 1.000000
996085247 16-APR-1999 -78,883.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 16-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
265,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-APR-1999 -265,000.00 -265,000.00 1.000000
996085247 19-APR-1999 265,000.00 265,000.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
265,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-APR-1999 -265,000.00 -265,000.00 1.000000
996085247 19-APR-1999 -265,000.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 19-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
283,725.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-APR-1999 -283,125.40 -283,725.40 1.000000
996005247 20-APR-1999 283,725.40 283,725.40 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
283,725.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-APR-1999 -283,725.40 -283,725.40 1.000000
996085247 20-APR-1999 -283,725.40 0.00 1.000000
PC 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
18,600.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-APR-1999 -18,600.00 -18,600.00 1.000000
996085247 21-APR-1999 16,600.00 18,600.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 4
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
18,600.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-APR-1999 -18,600.00 -18,600.00 1.000000
996085247 21-APR-1999 -18,600.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,529.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-APR-1999 -92,529.29 -92,529.29 1.000000
996085247 22-APR-1999 92,529.29 92,529.29 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,529.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-APR-1999 -92,529.29 -92,529.29 1.000000
996085247 22-APR-1999 -92,529.29 0.00 1.000000
FC 22-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
319,976.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-APR-1999 -319,976.36 -319,976.36 1.000000
996085247 26-APR-1999 319,976.36 319,976.36 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
319,976.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-APR-1999 -319,976.36 -319,976.36 1.000000
996085247 26-APR-1999 -329,976.36 0.00 1.000000
PC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
139,812.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-APR-1999 -139,812.59 -139,912.59 1.000000
996085247 27-APR-1999 139,812.59 139,812.59 1:000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
139,812.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-APR-1999 -139,812.59 -139,812.59 1.000000
996085247 27-APR-1999 -139,812.59 0.00 1.000000
FC 27-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
201,572.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-APR-1999 -281,572.50 -281,572.50 1.000000
996085247 30-APR-1999 281,572.50 281,572.50 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 5
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
281,572.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-APR-1999 -281,572.50 -281,572.50 1.000000
996085247 30-APR-1999 -281,572.50 0.00 1.000000
FC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 -61981,800.00 -6,981,800.00 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 6,981,800.00 6,981,800.00 99.740000
B MIDLAND BK, LONDON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 -35,303.82 -35,303.82 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 99.740000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 6,901,800.00 6,981,800.00 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 -6,981,800.00 -6,981,800.00 99.740000
BC MIDLAND BK, LONDON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 35,303.82 35,303.82 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 99.740000
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 -6,981,800.00 -6,981,800.00 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 61981.800.00 6,981,800.00 99.740000
B MIDLAND BK, LONDON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 -35,303.82 -35,303.82 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 99.740000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 12-APR-1999 6,981,800.00 6,981,800.00 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 -6,981,800.00 -6,981,800.00 99.740000
Page 6
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE. USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
BC MIDLAND BK, LONDON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN NITTER 12-APR-1999 35,303.82 35,303.82 99.740000
NA5422699 FLTG RATE 11-MAR-2003 USD1000 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 99.740000
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF 14-APR-1999 -6,095,703.13 -6,095,703.13 97.531250
OIN060650 6.000% 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 6,095,703.13 6,095,703.13 97.531250
8 GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF WIG 14-APR-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500
11POI1651 5.812% 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500
B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -2,012,500.00 -2,012,500.00 100.625000
1IF011651 5.812% 05/25/2029 25-MAY-1999 2,012,500.00 2,012,500.00 100.625000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP NT 21-APR-1999 -151,663.50 -151,663.50 101.109000
173034DQ9 9.750% 08/01/1999 26-APR-1999 151,663.50 151,663.50 101.109000
B 14ERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP NT 21-APR-1999 -3,453.13 -3,453.13 101.109000
173034DQ9 9.750% 08/01/1999 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 101.109000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
150,000.00 CITICORP SUB CAP NT 21-APR-1999 -155,116.63 -155,116.63 101.109000
173034DQ9 9.750% 08/01/1999 26-APR-1999 -155,116.63 0.00 101.109000
PC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.291250
Page 7
UCSGUUUlUU MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/95 26-APR-1999 91,102.46 91,102.46 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -386.86 -386.86 100.281250
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.281250
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/65 26-APR-1999 91,102.46 91,102.46 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -370.01 -370.01 100.281250
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 O.DD 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 12-MAR-1999 -91,472.47 -91,472.47 100.281250
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,472.47 0.00 100.281250
PC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 12-MAR-1999 -011,464.39 -811,464.39 100.281250
313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DD 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 811,464.39 811,464.39 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 12-MAR-1999 -3,291.82 -3,291.82 100.281250
313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DD 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IE ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
809,188.55 FNMA POOL #0047935 12-MAR-1999 -614,756.21 -814,756.21 100.281250
313612HL0 5.839% 05/01/2027 DO 05/01/87 26-APR-1999 -814,756.21 0.00 100.281250
FC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 8
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN ]ASS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
366,757.31 FNMA POOL #0062938 12-MAR-1999 -367,788.81 -367,788.81 100.281250
31362J4XO 5.839% 03/01/2027 DD 06/01/89 26-APR-1999 367,708.81 367,788.81 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
366,757.31 FNMA POOL #0062938 12-MAR-1999 -1,491.99 -1,491.99 100.281250
31362J4X0 5.839% 03/01/2027 DO O6/01/88 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
366,757.31 FNMA POOL #0062938 12-MAR-2999 -369,200.80 -369,290.80 100.281250
31362J4X0 5.839% 03/01/2027 DD 06/01/88 26-APR-1999 -369,280.80 0.00 100.281250
FC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
99,965.39 FNMA POOL #0077648 12-MAR-1999 -100,246.54 -100,246.54 100.291250
313624HZ4 5,617% 03/01/2018 DO 06/01/89 26-APR-1999 100,246.54 100,246.54 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
99,965.39 FNMA POOL /0077640 12-MAR-1999 -403.47 -403.47 100.201250
313624HZ4 5.617% 03/01/2018 DO 06/01/89 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
99,965.39 FNMA POOL 10077648 12-MAR-1999 -100,650.01 -100,650.01 100.281250
313624HZ4 5.617% 03/01/2018 DO O6/01/89 26-APR-1999 -100,650.01 0.00 100.281250
PC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
514,435.31 FNMA POOL #0190012 12-MAR-1999 -515,882.16 -515,882.16 100.281250
31368HAM5 6.153% 11/01/2027 OD 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 515,882.16 515,882.16 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
514,435.31 FNMA POOL #0190012 12-MAR-1999 -2,092.75 -2,092.75 100.281250
31368HAMS 6.153% 11/01/2027 DD 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 9
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
514,435.31 FNMA POOL #0190012 12-MAR-1999 -517,974.91 -517,974.91 100.281250
31368HAMS 6.1531 11/01/2027 DD 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 -517,974,91 0.00 100.281250
PC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,808.29 FNMA POOL #0292979 12-MAR-1999 -119,142.44 -119,142.44 100.281250
31373GJY5 5.925% 07/01/2024 DO 08/01/94 26-APR-1999 119,142.44 219,142.44 100.281250
B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11B,808.29 FNMA POOL #0292879 12-MAR-1999 -488.85 -489.85 100.281250
31373GJY5 5.9251 07/01/2024 DO 08/01/94 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.281250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,808.29 FNMA POOL #0292879 12-MAR-1999 -119,631.29 -119,631.29 100.281250
31373GJYS 5.925% 07/01/2024 DO 08/01/94 26-APR-1999 -119,631.29 0.00 100.281250
PC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 1TR 00246 20-APR-1999 -3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 100.000000
42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 27-APR-1999 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 100.000000
B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 4TR 00246 20-APR-1999 -3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 100.000000
42333HLF7 FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DD 04/27/99 27-APR-1999 -3,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000
PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 27-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 -2,151,250.00 -2,151,250.00 107.562500
542671CT7 9.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 03-MAY-1999 2,151,250.00 2,151,250.00 107.562500
B BNY CAPITAL MARKETS INC, NEW Y ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 28-APR-1999 -21,866.67 -21,866.67 107.562500
542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 03-14AY-1999 0.00 0.00 107.562500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 10
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN ETA 00299 12-APR-1999 -6,996,129.00 -6,996,129.00 99.944700
61745ENL1 FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 15-APR-1999 6,996,129.00 61996,129.00 99.944700
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN ETA 00299 12-APR-1999 -6,996,129.00 -6,996,129.00 99.944700
61745ENL1 FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 15-APR-1999 -6,996,129.00 0.00 99.944700
FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 15-APR-1999 -1,000,000.00 -1,000,000.00 100.000000
73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 21-APR-1999 11000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 15-APR-1999 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000
73317PAD1 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 21-APR-1999 -1,000,000.00 -11000,000.00 100.000000
BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 15-APR-1999 -11000,000.00 -1,000,000.00 100.000000
73317PAD1 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 21-APR-1999 11000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN #TR 00004 15-APR-1999 -1,000,000.00 -1,000,000.00 100.000000
73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 21-APR-1999 -10001000.00 0.00 100.000000
PC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PAY UPS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
14.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-APR-1999 -14.00 -14.00 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.3241 09/15/2032 01-APR-1999 14.00 14.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-APR-1999 -14.00 -14.00 100.000000
Page 11
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
3133TCE95 6.324E 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -14.00 0.00 100.000000
FC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,352.33 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 01-APR-1999 -11,352.33 -11,352.33 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-APR-1999 11,352.33 11,352.33 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,352.33 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 01-APR-1999 -11,352.33 -11,352.33 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-APR-1999 -11,352.33 0.00 100.000000
PC 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -13,100.00 -13,100.00 100.000000
9128272M3 3.375E 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAM-1999 13,100.00 13,100.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -13,100.00 -13,100.00 100.000000
9128272M3 3.375E 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -13,100.00 0.00 100.000000
FC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -9,030.00 -9,030.00 100.000000
9128273AB 3.625E 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 9,030.00 9,030.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
9,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -9,030.00 -9,030.00 100.000000
9128273A8 3.625E 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 -9,030.00 0.00 100.000000
FC 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 23-APR-1999 98,846.22 98,846.22 98.846220
313396FW MAT 05/04/1999 26-APR-1999 -98,846.22 -98,046.22 98.846220
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 12
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-APR-1999 1,049.56 1,049.56 98.846220
313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 98.946220
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 23-APR-1999 99,895.78 99,095.78 98.846220
313396FOO MAT 05/04/1999 26-APR-1999 99,895.78 0.00 98.846220
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,291,976.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-APR-1999 1,291,976.83 1,291,976.83 1.000000
996065247 05-APR-1999 -1,291,976.83 -1,291,976.83 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,291,976.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-APR-1999 1,292,976.83 1,291,976.83 1.000000
996085247 05-APR-1999 1,291,976.83 0.00 1.000000
FC 05-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,876,615.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-APR-1999 1,876,615.14 1,876,615.14 1.000000
996085247 21-APR-1999 -1,876,615.14 -1,876,615.14 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,876,615.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-APR-1999 1,876,615.14 1,876,615.14 1.000000
996085247 21-APR-1999 1,876,615.14 0.00 1.000000
FC 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-107,639.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-APR-1999 107,639.70 107,639.70 1.000000
996085247 23-APR-1999 -107,639.70 -107,639.70 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-107,639.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 23-APR-1999 107,639.70 107,639.70 1.000000
996085247 23-APR-1999 107,639.70 0.00 1.000000
FC 23-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 13
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - '30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-55,220.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-APR-1999 55,220.85 55,220.85 1.000000
996085247 26-APR-1999 -55,220.85 -55,220.85 2.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-55,220.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-APR-1999 55,220.85 55,220.85 1.000000
996085247 26-APR-1999 55,220.85 0.00 1.000000
PC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 6,102,294.92 6,102,294.92 97.636718
OINO60643 6.000% 04/15/2029 22-APR-1999 -6,009,765.63 -6,009,765.63 97.636718
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 92,529.29 92,529.29 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 -6,102,294.92 -6,102,294.92 97.636718
OINO60643 6.000% 04/15/2029 22-APR-1999 6,009,765.63 6,009,765.63 97.636718
SC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- -92,529.29 -92,529.29 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,243,676.17 2,243,676.17 100.613281
IIF0I1644 VAR AT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 -2,236,639.26 -2,236,639.26 100.613281
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 7,036.91 7,036.91 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 14-APR-1999 2,013,515.63 2,013,525.63 100.675782
11F011644 VAR AT 04/25/2029 26-APR-1999 -2,005,954.49 -2,005,954.49 100.675782
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 7,561.14 7,561.14 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-90,846.95 FNMA POOL #0020105 14-APR-1999 91,460.88 91,460.88 100.675781
31360YKS2 6.0721 11/01/2024 DO 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 -91,102.46 -91,102.46 100.675781
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 358.42 358.42 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-90,846.95 FNMA POOL 10020105 14-APR-1999 370.01 370.01 100.675781
Page 14
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/85 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-90,846.95 FNMA POOL /0020105 14-APR-1999 91,830.69 91,830.89 100.675781
31360YKS2 6.072% 11/01/2024 DD 02/01/95 26-APR-1999 91,830.89 0.00 100.675781
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-99,965.39 FNMA POOL #0077648 14-APR-1999 100,640.94 100,640.94 100.675781
313624HZ4 5.941% 03/01/2018 DO O6/01/89 26-APR-1999 -100,246.54 -100,246.54 100.675701
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 394.40 394.40 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-99,965.39 FNMA POOL #0077648 14-APR-1999 403.47 403.47 100.675781
313624HZ4 5.941% 03/01/2018 DD O6/01/89 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-99,965.39 FNMA POOL #0077648 14-APR-1999 101,044.41 101,044.41 100.675782
313624HZ4 5.941% 03/01/2018 DD 06/01/89 26-APR-1999 101,044.41 0.00 100.675781
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 27-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-514,435.31 FNMA POOL 00190012 14-APR-1999 517,911.77 517,911.77 100.675781
31368HAM5 VAR AT 11/01/2027 DO 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 -515,002.16 -515,882.16 100.675781
S GOLDMAN SACHS f CO, NY ----------- 2,029.61 2,029.61 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-514,435.31 FNMA POOL #0190012 14-APR-1999 2,092.75 2,092.75 100.675781
31368HAM5 VAR RT 11/01/2027 DD 09/01/93 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-118,808.29 FNMA POOL #0292879 14-APR-1999 119,611.17 119,611.17 100.675781
31373GJY5 5,925% 07/01/2024 DO 08/01/94 26-APR-1999 -119,142.44 -119,142.44 200.675781
S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 468.73 468.73 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Pag* 15
OCSGO00100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-118,BOB.29 FNMA POOL #0292879 14-APR-1999 488.85 488.85 100.675781
31373GJY5 5.925% 07/01/2024 DO OB/01/94 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.675781
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-118,BOB.29 FNMA POOL $0292B79 14-APR-1999 120,100.02 120,100.02 100.675781
31373GJY5 5.925% 07/01/2024 DO 08/01/94 26-APR-1999 120,100.02 0.00 100.675781
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 7,005,537.00 7,005,537,00 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/99 15-APR-1999 -7,003,710.00 -7,003,710.00 100.079100
S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 1,827.00 1,827.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 50,178.33 50,178.33 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 200.079100
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 -7,005,537.00 -7,005,537.00 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 7,003,710.00 7,003,710.00 100.079100
SC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- -1,827.00 -1,827.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 -50,178.33 -50,178.33 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.079100
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 7,005,537.00 7,005,537.00 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 -7,003,710.00 -7,003,710.00 100.079100
S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 1,827.00 1,827.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 50,178.33 50,178.33 100.079100
61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 100.079100
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 16
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES 12-APR-1999 7,055,715.33 7,055,715.33 100,079100
61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 15-APR-1999 7,055,715.33 0.00 100.079100
PC CHEMICAL BK/BROKER 6 DEALER, N 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-152,584.82 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-APR-1999 152,584.82 152,584.82 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-APR-1999 -152,268.92 -152,268.92 100.000000
PD ----------- 315.90 315.90 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-152,584.82 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-APR-1999 152,584.82 152,584.82 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900E 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-APR-1999 152,584.82 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-717,522.98 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-APR-1999 717,522.90 717,522.98 100.000000
3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-APR-1999 -728,734.28 -728,734.28 100.000000
PD ----------- -11,211.30 -11,211.30 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-717,522.98 FHLMC GROUP 6G5-0476 01-APR-1999 717,522.98 717,522.98 100.000000
312ODDQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-APR-1999 717,522.98 0.00 100.000000
FC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
78,899.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAR-1999 -78,889.50 -78,889.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 78,975.79 78,975.79 100.000000
PDC ----------- 86.29 86.29 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAR-1999 20.50 20.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 -20.52 -20.52 100.000000
PD ----------- -0.02 -0.02 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAR-1999 -20.50 -20.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 09/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 20.52 20.52 100.000000
Page 17
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
PDC ----------- 0.02 0.02 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-78,903.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAR-1999 78,903.50 78,903.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 -78,989.80 -78,989.80 100.000000
PD ----------- -86.30 -86.30 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-78,903.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-MAR-1999 78,903.50 78,903.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 78,903.50 0.00 100.000000
FC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-83,351.50 FHLMC NULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-APR-1999 83,351.50 83,351.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-APR-1999 -83,442.67 -03,442.67 100.000000
PD ----------- -91.17 -91.17 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-45,881.85 FHLMC MULTICL MIS P/C 1574 E O1-APR-1999 45,881.85 45,881.85 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-APR-1999 -45,817.33 -45,817.33 100.000000
PD ----------- 64.52 64.52 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-45,881.85 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-APR-1999 45,881.85 45,881.85 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-APR-1999 45,801.85 0.00 100.000000
FC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,272.89 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-APR-1999 20,272.89 20,272.89 100.000000
31677EM4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-APR-1999 -20,272.89 -20,272.89 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,272.89 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-APR-1999 20,272.89 20,272.89 100.000000
31677EM4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-APR-1999 20,272.89 0.00 100.000000
FC 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-94,714.95 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-APR-1999 94,714.95 94,714.95 100.000000
Page 18 ,
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TWO
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LASS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-APR-1999 -96,283.67 -96,283.67 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,568.72 -1,560.72 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
94,714.95 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-APR-1999 -94,714.95 -94,714.95 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-APR-1999 96,293.67 96,283.67 100.000000
PDC ----------- 1,568.72 1,568.72 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-94,710.10 GNMA II POOL f0080023 01-APR-1999 94,710.10 94,710.10 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.00O1 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-APR-1999 -96,278.74 -96,278.74 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,568.64 -1,568.64 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-94,710.10 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-APR-1999 94,710.10 94,710.10 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 22/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-APR-1999 94,710.10 0.00 100.000000
FC 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-162,239.31 GNMA II POOL 0080088M O1-APR-1999 162,239.31 162,239.31 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-APR-1999 -165,708.30 -165,788.30 100.000000
PD ----------- -3,548.99 -3,548.99 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-162,239.31 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-APR-1999 162,239.31 162,239.31 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-APR-1999 162,239.31 0.00 100.000000
PC 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-340,961.39 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-APR-1999 340,961.39 340,961.39 100.000000
70442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 25-APR-1999 -337,085.62 -337,005.62 100.000000
PD ----------- 3,875.77 3,875.77 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-340,961.39 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-APR-1999 340,961.39 340,961.39 100.000000
78442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 25-APR-1999 340,961.39 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
Page 19
uUSGUOUlUU MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM1O0
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 07-APR-1999 889,957.00 889,857.00 100.00000D
02581SR78 04/07/1999 07-APR-1999 -889,857.00 -889,857.00 100.0000O0
MT BOND MATURITY 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMOO
-900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 21-APR-1999 889,962.00 889,962.00 100.000000
34539URM6 04/21/1999 21-APR-1999 -889,962.00 -889,962.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-APR-1999 7,166,120.00 7,166,120.00 100.000000
34539URP9 04/23/1999 23-APR-1999 -7,166,120.00 -7.166,120.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 23-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 27-APR-1999 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 100.000000
423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 DD 04/27/94 27-APR-1999 -2,999,310.00 -2,999,310.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 27-APR-1999 690.00 690.00 1.000000000
0.00
INTEREST
U.S. DOLLAR
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 07-APR-1999 10,143.00 10,143.00 0.000000
02581SR78 04/07/1999 07-APR-1999 10,143.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-APR-1999 67,500.00 67,500.00 0.000000
073902AH1 6.7508 04/15/2003 15-APR-1999 67,500.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
152,584.82 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-APR-1999 6,375.28 6,375.28 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-APR-1999 6,375.28 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 20
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 21-APR-1999 17,277.61 17,277.61 0.000000
171200EBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-APR-1999 17,277.61 0.00 0.000000
IT 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 15-APR-1999 33,125.00 33,125.00 0.000000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 15-APR-1999 33,125.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
717,522.98 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 15-APR-1999 71,826.89 71,826.89 0.000000
3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-APR-1999 71,826.89 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
78,903.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-APR-1999 20,247.07 20,247.07 0.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 20,247.07 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 30-APR-1999 14.00 14.00 0.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-MAR-1999 14.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 26-APR-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-JAN-1999 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
45,881.85 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-APR-1999 4,828.79 4,828.79 0.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-APR-1999 4,828.79 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,352.33 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 28-APR-1999 11,352.33 11,352.33 0.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-APR-1999 11,352.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 28-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 21
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 19-APR-1999 265,000.00 265,000.00 0.000000
31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 18-APR-1999 265,000.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 19-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,272.99 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-APR-1999 1,003.12 1,003.12 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-APR-1999 1,003.12 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
900,000.00 FORD MTA CA CO DISC 21-APR-1999 10,038.00 10,038.00 0.000000
34539URM6 04/21/1999 21-APR-1999 10,038.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 21-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,200,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 23-APR-1999 33,880.00 33,880.00 0.000000
34539URP9 04/23/1999 23-APR-1999 33,880.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
94,710.10 GNMA II POOL 90080023 20-APR-1999 10,204.47 10,204.47 0.000000
36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-APR-1999 10,204.47 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
162,239.31 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 20-APR-1999 16,571.52 16,571.52 0.000000
36225CC20 6.0751 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-APR-1999 16,571.52 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN O1-APR-1999 28,125.00 28,125.00 0.000000
37042M7G2 6.2501 01/11/2000 DO O1/11/94 01-APR-1999 28,125.00 0.00 0.000000
IT O1-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 01-APR-1999 129,375.00 129,375.00 0.000000
37042RK04 8.6251 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 01-APR-1999 129,375.00 0.00 0.000000
IT O1-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 22
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ,
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 01-APR-1999 33,500.00 33,500.00 0.000000
37042NGKI 6.7001 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 01-APR-1999 33,500.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 27-APR-1999 39,126.60 39,126.60 0.000000
423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 27-APR-1999 39,126.60 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 01-APR-1999 79,687.50 79,697.50 0.000000
59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 01-APR-1999 79,687.50 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 07-APR-1999 175,500.00 175,500.00 0.000000
63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 07-APR-1999 175,500.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 07-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
340,961.39 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 26-APR-1999 54,269.57 54,269.57 0.000000
78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 25-APR-1999 54,269.57 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 13,100.00 13,100.00 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAN-1999 13,100.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-APR-1999 281,562.50 291,562.50 0.000000
9128272SO 06.6251 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 30-APR-1999 281,562.50 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-APR-1999 9,030.00 9,030.00 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 9,030.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-APR-2999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 23
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-APR-1999 - 30-APR-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 30-APR-1999 10.00 10.00 0.000000
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-APR-1999 10.00 0.00 0.000000
CD AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-APR-1999 356.21 356.21 0.000000
996085247 01-APR-1999 356.21 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-APR-1999 1,793.52 1,793.52 0.000000
996085247 01-APR-1999 1,793.52 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-APR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 24
FAHR COMMITTEE MedngDae TOBd
05/l2/99 OS/26/99
AGENDA REPORT
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1999 THROUGH
MARCH 31, 1999 (FAHR99-32)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period January 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly
reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two
funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,"
are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the
District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment
Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has
tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the
District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months.
The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or
derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
X M GC W eMFNiRFan9T92iK�1 W 9d12.he
R. „s„ Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports
The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment
Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for
reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector
diversification of the District's portfolios, as of December 31, 1998, and
March 311 1999. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity
of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as
U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios
as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through
March 31, 1999.
odrol o Parrormanoe Summary
Quarter Ended March 31,1999
Liquid Operating Modes Long-Term operating Modes(%)
Total Rale Total Rate or
d Return Berchmarkr'I Return aarchnadtrrl
3 Morris 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.4
8 Monins 2.5 2.3 1.0 0.9
9 Monthe /.0 3.5 as 4.
12 Mordnt, 5.5 4M 6.8 6.4
Since inception 30 Sept.95 5.8 1 5.2 6.9 6.5
Market Value per PIMCO 31 Mar.99 $181M 305.8
Average 0ualdy -M, -AM'
Current yield 9.W 6.15%
Estimated yield to Maturity 4.83 5.32
Quarterly DelxnAs(Withdrawals)
Estimated Annual Income 1.1M $1 Sam
(1) Benchmarks:
• Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index
• Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch CorplGovt 1-5 Year Bond Index
Market Recap
The U.S. economy continued its rapid growth during the first quarter of 1999
amid heightened concerns that the Federal Reserve would boost interest rates to
keep inflation subdued. However, with few signs that inflation was actually
increasing, and with reluctance to curtail growth in the U.S., short-term interest
rates were left unchanged by the Fed in the first quarter.
H� AHWah,ea AHRW32ex
R,..,.a I&VA Page 2
As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve," the
yield on the 30-year Treasury benchmark jumped 53 basis points when
compared to the end of the fourth quarter 1998 (5.09%), ending the first quarter
at 5.62%. This was near the level last reached in August 1998 before turbulence
in global financial markets sparked investor movement toward the relative safety
of U.S. dollar-denominated assets, and pushed yields below 5%.
Shorter rates showed little or no change. The 3-month Treasury rate increased
by 2 basis points (4.46% vs. 4.44%), and the 6-month rate remained unchanged
at 4.52%. However, intermediate rates (from 1 to 10 years)jumped dramatically;
a 19 basis point increase for the 1-year rate (4.70% vs. 4.51%), and a 59 basis
point increase for the 10-year rate (5.23% vs. 4.64%).
For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted
maturity or duration, slightly above the duration index (2.4 vs. 2.3 years),
emphasizing holdings in mortgage-backed bonds, investment grade corporate
notes, and U.S. Agency debentures. These investments contributed incremental
yield to the portfolio when compared to the all-Treasury benchmark yields. The
performance of the portfolio matched its benchmark (0.4%) for the first quarter.
For the Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio, PIMCO used a duration posture
slightly above index (approximately 109 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing slightly
longer short-term U.S. Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate
securities than the index. This added returns to the portfolio, which slightly
outperformed its benchmark (1.2% vs. 1.1%) for the first quarter.
Portfolio Market Values
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the
table below, and in the attached bar chart.
Long-Term
ugoia Operatlrrg
Quarter operating Monies
Ending Monies(SM) (SM)
31 March 98 17.8 306.0
30 June 98 18.1 311.5
305ept.98 18A 282.8
31 Dec.98 18.8 304.5
31 March 99 18.0 3058
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
M M Eb V Go'bFNIMF""9BSA fSaNn W ilhc
a,,;,", 1, Page 3
CEQA FINDINGS p
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Three Comparative Bar Charts
4. Historical Yield Curve Graph
SKIC
H.Mp.?a�pmEaTMWah939 AHRP nWc
R. 1r Page 4
Prepared by Finance, 4129199, 7:52 AM
OCSD Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$350,000,000
$300,000,000 •..— iii ----..__..... - ... ....— .........._— ♦..
iii iii •.• iii iii
$250,000,000 iii _ iii . ... iii — __ .........
$200,000,000 — iii ........ •..__.....
•.• iii iii iii iii
iii ... .. ♦.♦ ♦.♦ ♦.♦
$150,000,000
iii ��• •�• iii iii
$100,000,000 - iii iii iii ----- •�• — •�•
$50,000,000 �ZZ j�� �j� +**
31 Mar 98 30 Jun 98 30 Sep 98 31 Dec 98 31 Mar 99
O Liquid Operating Monies 0 Long-Term Operating Monies
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Financeqnvestmgmtprogram
Prepared by Finance,4/29/99, 8:08 AM
OCSD Liquid
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification 100100
100
90
80
70
60 ❑ 12/31/98
ac 50 ® 3/31/99
a`) 40
a.
30
20
10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\Portiolio short term
r.
Prepared by Finance,4/29/99, 8:56 AM
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification
100
90
80
70
gp ❑ 12/31/98
50 0 3/31/99
40
n- 30 2828
20
10Frog-
0 0 0 0
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dtaVin%2220�geggiTinanceWort(olio long term graph
Prepared by Finance, 4/27/99, 1:27 PM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
5.00
5.75
5.50
5.25
0
m 5.00
a
4.75
4.50
4.25
4.00
E E 5 5 5 r 5 a`, 5 5 5
t30-Sep-98 --6 31-Deo-98 —11-31-MaF99
G:lexcel.MaVin122201geggiTinance W istodcarrREASURYyieldcurve
v
FAHRCOMMITTEE Meeting Date ToBd.oDr.
5/12/99 5/25193
AGENDA REPORT iare7°" 'ce�Ie
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Slreed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report (FAHR99-33)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the
period ending March 31, 1999.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial
and Operational Report for the period ended March 31, 1999. This report is a
consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the
District Through the third quarter of the 1998-99 fiscal year.
Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of
the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program,
individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within
this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan
milestones identified in the 1998-99 Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 70.14 percent, or
$31,701,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been
expended. Net costs have decreased 1.21 percent in comparison with the same
period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 1999 is $476.56 based on flows of
66,521.09 million gallons, or 243 million gallons per day. This is $9, or 1.87
percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63.
Capital improvement outlays through March 31 were 40.8 percent of budget, or
$29,464,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
H%W qe�MTAHMFe1,9A9dWAHRWW C¢
R—, „yee Page 1
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ATTACHMENTS
District's Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended
March 31, 1999.
X`my.NabpenNYAXRv'vl„W5BeM1�AXR W Sl!¢
R-.a: 1� Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE 14 on9>✓ss To80.MDr.
sn S-�1s-57
AGENDA REPORT IemNumG IxmN eg
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Originator: ,
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF NEW MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN (FAHR99-34)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the selection of new Medical Insurance Company to replace United
HealthCare's Point-of-Service Plan and PacifiCare's Health Maintenance Organization
Plan effective July 1, 1999.
SUMMARY
The District's contracts with medical insurance providers United HealthCare and
PacifiCare will expire on June 30, 1999. In preparation for expected rate increases of
30% to 125% from United HealthCare, Human Resources staff asked the District's
insurance broker, FHI Insurance Services, to research and obtain bids from other
carriers as well as our current providers. We were also interested in finding a plan that
would offer the benefits of both a point-of-service plan and an HMO so that a covered
employee could select the level of benefit and cost most suitable for their needs.
FHI and Human Resources staff held preliminary meetings with five insurance carriers
and bids were received. At that point, three were eliminated from consideration due to
non-comparable benefits, services or rates.
Two insurance carriers, Health Net and Blue Cross, were found to have reasonable
price quotations and comparable benefits to our current plans. Both also had similar
physician networks to United HealthCare and PacifiCare, excellent customer service
reputations and point-of-service (POS) and health maintenance organization (HMO)
benefit levels.
Staff and FHI Insurance Services met with the Labor Management Committee (LMC) to
discuss the two alternatives for consideration by their represented members. After
presentation by the LMC to their individual groups, an agreement will be made with the
represented employee units to recommend either Blue Cross or Health Net POS and
HMO plans to replace United HealthCare and PacifiCare medical coverage. Although
representing an increase in District's cost of 6% -7%, this is substantially less than the
increase we would have incurred by staying with United HealthCare.
A recommendation for Blue Cross or Health Net will be provided to the FAHR
Committee with a Supplemental Agenda Report.
NaGm W ahl My CY\ps9a1FAXP\v�9AW aKAXR03y1 bf
Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The annual cost for medical insurance will increase approximately $151,465 (6.5%).
BUDGETIMPACT
X This item has been budgeted. (Line gem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
\MJmWaM1tYp GYVphKANMFMW.WTFANRBi31 bA
R..w: vxise Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE MeetingDgte TOBd.ofDir.
s/17JBB s/ze/Bs
AGENDA REPORT Rem Num1w Rem Number
14(at(b)(1)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: CONNECTION FEE CALCULATION METHODS AND POLICIES
(FAHR99-35)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Receive and file correspondence from Rutan & Tucker dated May 18, 1999, on
behalf of ProLogis Trust (formerly Security Capital Industrial Trust).
(2) Approve in concept the substantive provisions of a District Ordinance
establishing a Comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance.
(3) Direct staff to prepare a comprehensive Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
Ordinance for introduction and first reading at the regular meeting of the Board of
Directors on June 23, 1999; provide public notice; and schedule a public hearing
on the proposed Ordinance at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on
July21, 1999.
SUMMARY
It is recommended that a new comprehensive connection fee program and ordinance
which contains the following elements be adopted:
1. Base fees will be determined by type of development and are calculated per
1,000 square feet of building for non-residential development and per unit for
residential development.
2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees will be developed: low
demand, average demand and high demand.
3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I Permittees)will be charged demand-
based connection fees as a part of their on-going annual use charges, rather
than only as a one-time up front charge. These fees will include an interest
component.
4. Residential fees will be tiered based upon number of bedrooms for single-
family residential (SFR) and multi-family residential (MFR) development.
5. Connection fees will continue to be collected by local sewering agencies at
the time the building permit is issued.
H M'0 ftbg�Aga"4g Rer %IM ReL M1ftN ds
R. ermse Page 1
6. Credit for demolished structures will be granted only when the developer can
prove that prior connection fees were paid, and credit will be provided only for
the amount actually paid.
7. Connection fees will continue to not be charged for local agency facilities
such as schools and libraries. Connection fees will continue to be charged for
state and federal facilities. Connection fees will begin to be charged for
county and regional facilities that serve more than one OCSD Revenue Area.
8. The fee changes will be phased over the next 24 months.
Capital facilities connection fees, or connection fees for short, have been one-time fees
collected in order to cover the costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve the
property. Today, connection fees are collected for the District by member cities and
sanitary districts when building permits are issued. These fees were revisited as a part
of the Rate Advisory Committee's (RAC) work for the Strategic Plan. The discussion
and recommendations are in the "Determination of Financial Rates and Charges" report
prepared by the Strategic Plan Consultants and previously distributed to the Directors.
The main connection fee discussion points can be found on pages 1-3, 4-7. 9-7 and
A-18. The enclosed staff report contains supplemental information.
The RAC did not develop a specific connection fee calculation method, but did give staff
guidelines in several areas. The enclosed revised Staff Report summarizes the
alternatives, the evaluations, and the recommendations.
At the February FAHR Committee meeting, staff presented a proposal to change the
calculation method for connection fees, to change what costs were included in
connection fees, and to base the connection fees upon the new Strategic Plan capital
improvement program. The Committee requested a workshop in order to devote more
time to reviewing the changes.
The workshop was conducted April 10, 1999. All of the Directors were invited to attend
the workshop for information and feedback. Staff and consultants presented the
background, the recommended changes and the alternatives.
Connection fees are adopted by Ordinance. Staff recommends the enclosed draft
Ordinance be presented at the May 1999 Board meeting for a first reading. The second
reading would be at the June Board meeting and the Ordinance could become effective
as early as August 1, 1999. However, staff is also recommending a phase in of the
increased fees to allow the development community time to prepare. Schedules are
attached to aid in the discussion of implementation.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
H\cup tllabpendaV ,d Agenda RIM I1B 6 N np""d"RePoRSYYMem I a Ndx
R—.ed eaosa Page 2
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
See enclosed Staff Report.
ALTERNATIVES
See enclosed Staff Report.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Rutan & Tucker
2. Staff Report
3. Implementation Alternative Schedules
GGS:lc
\MrtbNGa Jl OSV pWa�W/g Re% %lM&v ApeiAa R�lylihc
RenW.. eaose Page 3
RUTAN & TUCKER , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAI
DING
x n wAeTNE6 s N o0U[wnw D56UNT[ Ca00 w.noNs
a Mean[• r...o✓a na.x i ANTON .o...ry rcvu. .v.z uvuax
-.ovnmev.c..v. XTE.e .wu°uo ..vme. oa.vovv o¢. evxx
COSTA MESA. CA4EORNIA 92626-iBBB
�, COSTA MESA MCA4AORNIA B26201950
T¢LEPIONE Oral Bai Ei00
rA<9iwiLE V.al ]06 BOJ6 v
NTERNET ARNE-1en.— E
....E.. „w.... ,""E,." ".E. May 18, 1999 .. .. E".p_..a ..... ..,e.e,
Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Re: Adjustment to Capital Facilities Connection Fees
Dear Chairperson Debay and Members of the Board:
The law firm of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, represents ProLogis Trust (formerly Security
Capital Industrial Trust), owner of two (2) large warehouse/distribution buildings located at 500
E. Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Anaheim. On behalf of our client, I am writing to
request that the Board take the following actions at your May 26, 1999, meeting with regard to
the staff recommendation on the sewer connection fee issue:
1. Approve the staff recommendation for the creation of a three-tiered commercial
connection fee or any alternative to the staff recommendation that provides for
"low demand" users to pay a fee not to exceed $200 per 1,000 square feet of
building area.
2. Disapprove the staff recommendation on the fee credit for demolished structures
and instead authorize a full credit or offset against the sewer connection fee in the
amount that would be payable by any pre-existing uses on the property in
question, without limiting the credit or offset to the amount of the connection fee
that the property owner can verify was previously paid.
I will briefly summarize ProLogis Trust's factual situation as background for the
recommendation set forth above.
ProLogis's warehouse/distribution buildings are located on the former Northrop property
just north of the Riverside Freeway, east of Lemon Street. Commencing in 1951, Northrop
acquired the property and developed it for aerospace manufacturing purposes. By 1989,
112JOI6J01-0 52UW. .01181"
RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Chairperson Debay and
Members of the Board of Directors
May 18, 1999
Page 2
Northrop had constructed and was occupying 10 separate buildings on the property with a total
of approximately 615,244 square feet of floor area. The property was utilized for intensive
industrial purposes.
In 1989, Northrop closed its facility on the property as a part of a consolidation of two
company divisions. Northrop then set about to sell the property. It soon discovered that it had
significant hazardous materials problems, both in the then-existing buildings and below ground.
In order to remove and remediate those environmental problems, Northrop was required to and
did demolish and clear its improvements and undertook an extensive surface and subsurface
environmental remediation program.
During the early 1990's, Northrop actively marketed the sale of the property to
prospective purchasers. The combination of unresolved environmental problems and the severe
economic recession that gripped Southern California in the early 1990's combined, however, to
prevent a quick sale.
Security Capital Industrial Trust (now ProLogis) purchased the property in September
of 1995 and moved quickly to pull building permits for its warehouse/distribution facilities on
December 1, 1995. Based upon the uniform $470 per $1,000 square foot connection fee for
non-residential users that was in effect at that time, Security Capital was required to pay a fee
of $556,480 for its 1,184,000 square feet of building improvements. No credit or offset was
allowed for the pre-existing Northrop buildings because of OCSD's "2-year rule" on fee credits
for demolished structures.
On February 28, 1996, Security Capital filed a protest of the connection fee with OCSD.
Security Capital challenged both the reasonableness of the uniform non-residential connection
fee as applied to its warehouse/distribution use and OCSD's refusal to allow it a credit or offset
against its connection fee based upon the prior Northrop use of the property. From that date
to the present, Security Capital/ProLogis and OCSD have agreed to a tolling of the deadline for
the filing of a lawsuit to resolve the fee dispute pending OCSD's completion of its long-awaited
connection fee study and Board action thereon.
The connection fee study completed by Carollo Engineers for OCSD in February of 1998
clearly demonstrates the unreasonableness of the non-residential connection fee as applied to the
Security Capital/ProLogis property. The average daily flow for warehouse facilities is only 25
gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of building area, only ten percent (10%) of the "basic
commercial" flow rate, two-and-one-half percent (2.5%)of the flow rate for a typical restaurant,
and a mere 7-10ths of 1% (0.7%) of the flow rate for a conventional car wash. (See Table 5-3
nvotsaoa.aa M"387, a0118M
RUTAN 6 TUCKER, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Chairperson Debay and
Members of the Board of Directors
May 18, 1999
Page 3
of the Carollo fee study.) Nonetheless, under the current system, all non-residential users pay
the same connection fee.
Various provisions of constitutional, statutory, and case law limit governmental fees and
exactions, including sewer connection fees, to an amount that "shall not exceed the estimated
reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed." See, e.g.,
Government Code Sections 66013(a) (which is specifically applicable to sewer connection
charges) and 66005(a). To the extent that such a fee exceeds the reasonable cost of providing
the service in question, the fee becomes a "special tax" subject to the requirement in Section 4
of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution ("Proposition 13") that it be approved by a
popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue. See Government Code Sections
50075-50077 and 66013(a) and Beaumont Investors v. Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District
(1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 227 (held: water district facilities fee constituted an unlawful special
tax under Article XIIIA, Section 4, requiring a two-thirds vote of the electorate, since the district
failed to sustain its burden of proving that the facilities fee did not exceed the reasonable cost
of providing the service for which it was imposed).
If OCSD's sewer connection fees were based on the actual usage of the various categories
of use analyzed in the Carollo Engineers fee study, the fee for ProLogis's warehouse/distribution
use would have to be reduced from S472 per 1,000 square feet to approximately $80 per 1,000
per square feet, an 83% reduction.
Instead of recommending that each of the approximately 30 non-residential use categories
be given a separate connection fee, your staff has recommended that a 3-tiered non-residential
rate structure be established which divides non-residential users into "low demand," "average
demand," and "high demand" categories. The proposed connection fee for the low demand user
category would be $200 per 1,00D square feet of building area, approximately 21h. times the rate
that is justified for a warehouseldistribution use but still an approximately 58% reduction from
the fee amount currently in place.
While ProLogis would prefer that the Board base the non-residential connection fee on
actual use for each user category, given the administrative complications of tracking and
predicting how properties will be utilized by so many separate use categories, we can support
as a compromise the simplified 3-tiered rate structure proposed by your staff(so long as the rate
for the low demand user category in which ProLogis's buildings have been placed does not
increase above the $200 per 1,000 square foot level recommended in your staff report). We
encourage the Board to implement the modified rate structure as quickly as possible.
uxoi eao�-000�nzaarr. .csneros
RUTAN 6 TUCKER, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Chairperson Debay and
Members of the Board of Directors
May 18, 1999
Page 4
Turning to the issue of the connection fee credit or offset available for demolished
structures, ProLogis cannot support your staffs recommendation, however. We do support the
staff proposal to eliminate the arbitrary 2-year cut-off(between demolition of the old structure(s)
and issuance of building permit(s) for the new structure(s)) on fee credits/offsets, but we do not
believe it would be fair to grant a credit or offset 'only when the developer can prove that prior
connection fees were paid" and then 'only for the amount actually paid," as your staff
recommends. (Staff report, p. 9.)
According to the information available to ProLogis, OCSD itself has no records on who
has historically paid sewer connection fees and how much those payments may have been.
These records, we are told, are maintained, if at all, by the County and the 20odd cities in
OCSD's jurisdiction. The County and each city have different policies on how long they will
maintain records that can be accessed verifying the amount of development/building fees paid
by individual developers and property owners. Since this information is not considered to be
of any long-term significance, our information (which admittedly is somewhat sketchy and
anecdotal) is that most cities would have a difficult time verifying fee payments beyond a period
of approximately 3-7 years after the payments are made.
Typically, buildings that are demolished are considerably older than that. We would
estimate the average age of a demolished non-residential building to be at least 30 years or more,
far beyond the time period that the County and virtually any city in OCSD's jurisdiction would
be able to produce documentation verifying the amount of fees (if any) initially paid.
Property owners with existing buildings and uses have a legitimate expectation that if they
demolish and rebuild they will not be "tagged" with a new sewer connection fee. In our
opinion, owners who have been hooked up to the sanitary sewer system for many years have a
constitutionally vested right to continue to receive sewer service without having to pay a new
connection fee --unless, that is, they build a larger building or change the prior use in a manner
that causes a net increase in their burden on the existing wastewater treatment system.
A good example of this principle is the recent highly publicized United States Supreme
Court decision in Dolan v. City of 77gard (1994) 512 U.S. _, 129 L.Ed.2d 304, 114 S.Ct.
2309. In that case, a property owner sought a permit to demolish an existing plumbing and
electrical supply store of approximately 9,700 square feet and to reconstruct a new larger
building on the opposite side of the property consisting of approximately 17,600 square feet.
The city had conditioned the development upon dedication of a 15-foot-wide public bicycle path
across the property. The Supreme Court invalidated the condition, finding that the city had not
met its burden of demonstrating that the additional number of bicycle trips to be generated by
the larger development was "roughly proportional" to the requirement for dedicating a bicycle
uvmw�2"M. .mnens
1
RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
AIQRNEYS YT LPW
Chairperson Debay and
Members of the Board of Directors
May 18, 1999
Page 5
pathway easement. See also, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) 483 U.S. 825,
97 L.Ed.2d 677, 107 S.Ct. 3141 (held: California Coastal Commission could not legitimately
demand a lateral public easement across a property owner's beachfront lot in exchange for a
permit to demolish an existing bungalow and replace it with a 3-bedroom house); Liberty v.
California Coastal Commission (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 491 (held: there was no reasonable
relationship between the public burden created by a property owner's request for permission to
demolish an existing structure and erect a restaurant across from a beach and the Coastal
Commission's demand that the property owner provide additional onsite public parking); and
Rohn v. City of Visalia (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 1463 (held: there was no nexus to support a
city's demand for a street dedication as a condition to approval of the conversion of residential
property to office/ commercial use). In all of these cases, the courts held that the exactions
constituted unlawful "takings" of private property rights without just compensation, in violation
of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or the corresponding provision of the
California Constitution (Article I, Section 19).
The staffs recommended approach on the issue of connection fee credits for demolished
structures would lead to exceedingly arbitrary results. Consider the following examples:
EXAMPLE NO. 1: Homeowner A has lived in his house in City X for
30 years. City X maintains building fee records for only 5 years. Home-
owner A's home is destroyed in a fire. Should Homeowner A be required to
pay a new OCSD sewer connection fee because he cannot verify that a connection
fee was paid 30 years ago or the amount thereof!
EXAMPLE NO. 2: Ten years ago, Business Owner A and Business Owner B
constructed identical buildings in Cities X and Y, respectively. City X maintains
building fee records for 20 years. City Y maintains building fee records for only
5 years. Business Owners A and B each decide to demolish and rebuild their
respective buildings. Why should Business Owner A be entitled to a connection
fee credit when Business Owner B receives none?
The rights of a property owner to demolish and rebuild without having to pay a new
capital facilities fee is analogous to the vested right of a permit holder to continue to utilize a
land use permit so long as the permit has not been "abandoned." As recently stated by the
California Supreme Court in an analogous context (involving nonconforming uses):
"Cessation of use alone does not constitute abandonment
'[A]bdonment of a . . . use ordinarily depends upon a
concurrence of two factors: (1) An intention to abandon; and (2)
uv016$0 a m V. .asnsW
RUTAN 6 TUCKER, LLP
rrowHevs AT IA-
Chairperson Debay and
Members of the Board of Directors
May 18, 1999
Page 6
an overt act, or failure to act, which carries the implication the
owner does not claim or retain any interest in the right to . . . use
(citations omitted]. Only if non-use of property evidences 'more
than a temporary vacancy but rather an intentional decision to
abandon the premises' does a property owner lose his or her vested
right to the use in question."
Stokes v. Board of Permit Appeals (1997) 52 Cal.AppAth 1348, 1354. It is unfair and,
we submit, not legal for OCSD to attempt to penalize property owners who demolish structures
to remediate environmental hazards (as Northrop did on the Security CapitaVProLogis property)
or to improve or upgrade their properties generally.
It is easy enough to compare the former building square footage and use with the
proposed new building square footage and use in calculating whether a fee credit or offset is
due and the amount thereof. Such a system would apply uniformly to all classes of ratepayers
and would charge them only for their net incremental burden on OCSD's existing sanitary sewer
system. That is how it should be.
To summarize, ProLogis Trust respectfully urges the Board to (1) approve a three-tiered
commercial connection fee or some alternative that would result in "low demand" users paying
an amount not to exceed $200 per 1,000 square feet of building area and (2) approve a full fee
credit for demolished buildings (without the arbitrary existing two-year cutoff) such that
connection fees are based strictly on the net incremental burden added to OCSD's sewer system.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
RUT & TUCKER, LLP
7e /�. Oderman
IMO:jh
cc: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq., General Counsel
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Charla Rios, ProLogis Trust
�ivo�aaosaooensaener. .osn e�vs
(Revised)
May 3, 1999
STAFF REPORT
Connection Fee Alternatives
Capital facilities connection fees, or connection fees for short, have been one-time fees
collected in order to cover the costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve the
property. Today, connection fees are collected for the District by member cities and
sanitary districts when building permits are issued. These fees were revisited as a part
of the Rate Advisory Committee's (RAC) work for the Strategic Plan.
The RAC did not develop a specific connection fee calculation method, but did give staff
guidelines in several areas:
• The existing calculation method should be changed.
• There should be different residential fees to reflect different impacts.
• The economic and social benefits of commercial/industrial development should be
considered.
• Collection methods besides"one-time, up-front" should be considered.
• Costs of facilities related to wet-weather flows should be shared on the basis of wet-
weather flow increases.
• New users should pay for new capacity.
Existing Program
The existing method of calculation was developed as a part of the 1989 Master Plan,
also called the 2020 VISION Master Plan. Future users are charged their share of all
facilities, both existing and future, that will be in place in 2020 as if all facilities and all
users came into the system on that date. This calculation method is sometimes called
the "capital investment equalization method". If the value of all the facilities is projected
to be $2,360,000,000, and the total number of users is projected to be 1,000,000, then
the connection fee is $2,360. One of the most significant assumptions in 1989 was that
the non-residential use factor per 1,000 square feet of building is 20% of single-family
residential use. This results in a non-residential connection fee of$472 ($2,350 x 20%)
per 1,000 square feet in this example. This calculation method can also be described
as "all users, past, present and future, pay the same."
RAC Program
The RAC recommended that capital costs be categorized and that different user types
pay for different categories of costs. Cost categories were developed for existing net
assets, additional dry weather capacity, additional wet weather capacity, improved
Connection Fee Altematives
Page 2 of 9
May 3, 1999
treatment and rehabilitation/reconstruction. The following table explains the allocation
of these cost categories to user groups.
Cost Category Allocation of Costs
• Existing Assets Less Debt . Current users have paid for
support facilities, etc; all new
users will also pay a share
• Dry Weather Capacity • All new users will pay
• Wet Weather Capacity • New residential and new non-
residential users will pay based
upon comparative length of sewers
within each group
• Improved Treatment • Current and new users will pay
• Rehab/Reconstruction • Current and new users will pay
By leaving the existing assets cost category out of this calculation, this allocation
method can be changed to one best described as, "all users from now on pay the
same,' and/or as, 'Yuture users will only pay for future capacity."
Significant Changes
Several things have changed since the 1989 adoption of the'2020 VISION Master
Plan" that impact the calculation of connection fees. The Strategic Plan proposed a
capital improvement plan through 2020 that is approximately equal to the"2020 Vision"
projects, but there are 10 fewer years in the planning horizon. The planned daily flow
for a single-family residence, or an equivalent dwelling unit, has been reduced, based
upon experience and metering, from 399 gallons to 260 gallons. The total average daily
flow into the plants at 2020 has been reduced from 399,000,000 to 352,000,000 gallons.
The total number of equivalent dwelling units that are projected to be connected in 2020
has therefore increased from 1,000,000 to 1,354,000. However, the change that has
the most impact on non-residential connection fees, is that the average daily flow per
1,000 square feet has been calculated at 150 gallons per day, rather than the 80 gallons
per day that had been assumed historically. This change alone would result in a near
doubling of the non-residential connection fee.
Discussion
Several methods of implementing the RAC recommendations were evaluated and the
resulting rates were calculated.
User Fee Basis -With the intention of developing consistency between the flow and
strength based user fee program and connection fees, fees were calculated based upon
the flow, BOO and SS assumptions used to determine user fees. (BOD, biochemical
oxygen demand, and SS, microscopic suspended solids, are common measurements of
wastewater strength.) Estimated flows and strength were the result of surveys and
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 3 of 9
May 3, 1999
studies performed by the Strategic Plan consultants. This resulted in 30 separate
connection fees ranging from $79/1,000 sq. ft. for a drive-in theater, to $6,828/1,000 sq.
ft. for a conventional car wash.
High connection fees per 1,000 square feet for restaurants have been mitigated by
some agencies by providing incentives. Restaurants that install grease traps and do not
install garbage disposals have had the BOD and SS assumptions reduced by 50%.
These incentives are certainly worth pursuing, and will be a part of future user fee
discussions, where they may be more appropriate. To be effective, such a program
must include some sort of monitoring or inspection by staff or by another agency.
The highest rate calculated is for conventional car washes. A 25% reduction in
assumed flow can be granted for a car wash that installs a water recycling system. This
incentive is already a part of the user fee structure and program adopted last year.
The general use of the property would need to be known at the time building permits are
issued, in order to determine most accurately which of the 30 fees to use. The range of
fees from lowest to highest is 8,500%, and the maximum increase from current fees is
1,330%. Some would congider these percentages excessive. This option most closely
matches the RAC presentation.
Summary User Fee Basis—This was a two-step process. Connection fees were first
computed per 1,000 sq. ft. of development as above. Those uses with reasonably close
fees were then combined and consolidated. The number of different fees was reduced
from 30 to 15, and the range was from $8011,000 sq. ft. to $6,800/1,000 sq. ft This
option is very close to the user fee basis for an individual property and should be easier
to administer but still results in very significant fee increases.
Average Use Basis - Because city staff collect connection fees on our behalf and
because the actual use of the property is often unknown, alternative connection fee
calculation methods were evaluated. Since one of our goals was to develop a fee that
reflected use, we considered whether the size of the connection, or the lateral, was a
good indicator. While the exact use, or the strength of use, could not be determined,
certainly the maximum use could. We discovered that there are generally only two
sizes of commercial laterals, that they are determined principally by ease of cleaning,
and that they are established by building codes. While these facts eliminated lateral
size as a fee factor, they also supported a minimum number of fees because the
maximum use from most developments would be approximately the same. Potential
maximum use is the basis for our current connection fee structure and results in the
same fee as average use. The average fee would be $654 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building
interior. Variances between user fee based and average use based fees range from
$575 below average to $6,174 above average per 1,000 square feet.
Master Plan Land Use Basis-The master plan or strategic plan process predicts
future flows and future capacity requirements based upon land use. Cities and counties
adopt land use plans for future developments within their spheres of influence. Each of
these land uses is assigned a flow coefficient per acre. Following are the consultants'
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 4 of 9
May 3, 1999
flow assumptions for the current Strategic Plan effort and the number of acres in each
land use category at the theoretical service area build-out in 2118:
Land Use Category Gallons PerAerell) Total Acres
1. Estate Residential 727 27,238
2. Low Density Residential 1,488 76,345
3. Medium Density Residential 3,451 19,909
4. Medium High Density Residential 7,516 3,754
5. Commercial/Office 2,262 19,851
6. Industrial 3,167 18,886
7. High Density Ind./Comm. 5,429 5,952
B. Institutional 2,715 9,617
Advantages of the land use method are: 1) the fee is based on the same flow
projections as the Strategic Plan; 2) the actual property use does not need to be known
when the connection permit is issued; 3) it is easy to administer; 4) the fee does vary to
reflect different flow demands; 5) adjusting the connection fee for user BOD and SS
differences may be of little real benefit as the actual influent concentrations at the
headworks approximate residential strength and facilities are built to treat the average
influent strength.
A disadvantage of this method is that the fee is based upon average flow generated for
acreage and does not change for the size of the building, or the actual type of use, so
long as the land use category does not change. In total, this may be a minor issue, but
connection fee variances for individual projects are significant.
Fees resulting from the use of acreage and master planning flow coefficients are:
Land Use Category Fee Per Acre Fee Per Unit
Estate Residential $3,187
Low density Residential 1,814
Medium Density Residential 1,754
Medium High Density Residential 1,754
High Density Residential 1,647
Commercial/Office $16,978
Industrial 23,767
Institutional 20,371
High Density Ind./Comm. 40,734
Proposed Basis
Staff and consultants have reviewed and reconsidered each of the alternatives in the
light of the comments by the FAHR Committee, the City of Anaheim and District staff. A
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 5 of 9
May 3, 1999
proposal was developed which takes the best from the various other alternatives and
retains consistency with the current calculation method.
The base fee is proposed to continue to be calculated on the"capital investment
equalization method." Total capital costs of 2020 will be allocated to all users at 2020 to
calculate the base fee. Differences in non-residential use per 1,000 square feet will be
accommodated in two ways: Rates will be adopted for very low uses such as
warehouses and parking structures; and rates will be adopted for very high uses, such
as restaurants and car washes. Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, those
requiring Class I permits from our Source Control Division, will pay an ongoing capital
charge on their quarterly invoices for their individual demand that exceeds the average
allowed in the base connection fee.
This proposal is easy for the local agencies to administer, recognizes that not all users
place the same demand on the system, recognizes that the exact use of a property is
often unknown when building permits are issued, acknowledges that most users have
similar demands, and reduces the significant up-front charges faced by a large user.
Reduced UP-Front Payments
Connection fees based upon flow and strength can be significant for certain users. The
fee for a food processing plant that relocated to Orange County recently could have
been $1.4 million based upon a projected ultimate flow of 150,000 gallons a day a
combined 1,700 pounds of BOO and SS.
Because of the amount of this up-front fee, input from our member city and other
legislators and the pending Strategic Plan, this fee was put aside by the Directors. One
of the concerns expressed was that collecting such a significant fee in a lump sum
before the business was producing income placed a considerable cash flow burden on
a new business. Another issue was what happened to the fees if the business failed or
moved, since the business is not allowed to sell or move their right to use the system. A
third concern dealt with the accuracy of the initial flow projections, subsequent
increases and decreases in flows and the computation of connection fees in those
instances.
The current proposal is for these Significant Industrial/Commercial Users, SIUs or
Class I Permitees, to pay a base connection fee per 1,000 square feet of building. This
base fee will allow them to discharge an average quantity and strength of wastewater.
For use above this, a fee per gallon or per pound would be added to their quarterly
invoice for use, which will continue to be based upon actual flow and strength. In this
way, accurate impacts and uses are established as the basis for the connection fee,
cash flow matches production for the business, up-front costs are minimized, fees stop
if the business moves or quits and increased use generates additional "connection
fees." In order to compensate the District for the lost up-front funds and to provide for
the "time value of money, an interest component will be included in the rates per gallon
and pound.
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 6 of 9
May 3, 1999
Tiered Residential Fees
The RAC recommended that residential connection fees be tiered to reflect differing
demands on the sewerage system. One of the best ways to predict sewer use is by the
number of bedrooms because that correlates to the number of potential occupants.
Additionally, adding a bedroom requires a building permit and would trigger additional
connection fees. Consultants and staff analyzed census data and Assessor's Office
data to determine the mix of bedrooms in the single-family residential (SFR) and multi-
family residential (MFR) service area to determine the standard bedroom size for each,
as well as the number of existing and projected units. The result of this analysis is
shown below assuming that the MFR average daily flow is 70% of the SFR flow, the
same assumption used in determining user fees.
No. of Bedrooms SFR Ratio MFR Ratio
0 .327
1 .615 .508
2 .808 .700
3 1.000 .890
4 1.192 1.084
5 1.385
These ratios can be applied to any of the fee calculation options, and any residential
land use category.
Additional Alternative
For the past several years, connection fees have been collected for the District by the
city or sanitary district. Generally, the permit is issued by the Building Department and
the local agency retains 5% of the connection fee. When a non-residential project is
started before the actual tenant mix, or type of tenants, is known, such as in the case of
a strip mall, an industrial park or a shopping center, two of our alternatives cannot be
used. Additionally, if there is a significant change in the type of use after the connection
fee is paid, we are not aware of it as there may be no building permit or additional
square feet of building.
A possible source of accurate use information is the Certificate of Occupancy process.
It may be possible to move all, or a portion, of the connection fee collection to this
process. Of course, arrangements will need to be made or negotiated with each of the
agencies. This could possibly increase the amount of the connection fee, would
definitely increase the impact on the collecting agencies and may not be acceptable to
every agency.
Credit for Demolished Structures
For many years, the connection fee ordinance has allowed credit for structures
demolished up to two years prior to issuance of new building permit. The credit is
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 7 of 9
May 3, 1999
determined to be an amount equal to the current connection fee for the demolished
structure. Thus, if 25 single-family homes were demolished and replaced with 75
single-family homes, the developer would only be required to purchase 50 new permits.
This credit is allowed whether or not connection fees were ever paid, and regardless of
the amount of connection fees actually paid. (In no event is a refund ever granted.)
Recently, two separate developers have challenged the two-year period. The basic
argument put forth by the lawyers for each of these developers is that the previous
buildings paid for the capacity they used, either through connection fees or property
taxes. Connection fees in this area, formerly District No. 2, were adopted in 1973 at
$50 per 1,000 square feet. Prior to passage of Proposition 13 in 1976, each District
also levied a separate property tax for capital improvements.
The other view is that sewage treatment facilities are planned and constructed based
upon flow trends and demands. When a building is demolished, flows decrease. After
some reasonable period, planners need to be able to know that the flow decrease is
"permanent," and that future capacity needs will be met through connection fees.
At the present time, the District has a protest and a subsequent Tolling Agreement
concerning a huge project in the City of Anaheim, contiguous to the Fullerton City line,
where the former Northrop aerospace facilities were demolished and new industrial
projects were constructed in place of the original buildings. The new builder has paid
the entire fee but has protested it. Both parties have agreed to take no legal action to
resolve this, pending the connection fee study and report that resulted from the RAC
process and the Strategic Plan and the final adoption of a new comprehensive
Connection Fee Ordinance by the District.
It would appear that the Directors have four options:
1. Remove the two-year provision and provide, instead, that if the owner establishes
proof of payment of a connection charge by the current or any prior owner of the
property, then a credit for the amount paid would be allowed against the current
charge. (Whether or not the current owner of the Northrop property can prove prior
payments is not known. The District has no records as connection fees are paid at
the local sewering agency.)
2. Remove the two-year provision and provide, instead, that any new replacement
building would not be required to pay any capital facility charge so long as the new
use was no more than the previous demand. (This would effectively negate the
payment and Tolling Agreement for the Northrop property and would require the
District to refund about $267,000 of the $556,000 paid, plus interest.)
3. Extend the time period to more than two years in which property owners must
redevelop the property in order to receive a credit, because delays may be caused
by the local permitting process, the economy, or other factors outside the control of
the developer.
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 8 of 9
May 3, 1999
4. Maintain the two-year period on the basis that it is a reasonable time in which to
have redevelopment undertaken.
Reduced Fee for Low Income or Senior Citizen Developments
From time to time, the Directors have been asked to consider reducing or waiving the
connection fee for various projects deemed socially desirable. Most often these are
projects for senior citizens or to provide low-cost housing. It has not been uncommon
for various other agencies to waive their fees for these projects. Nonetheless, the
Directors have not granted these requests in the past.
One reason for this practice has been the connection fee ordinance itself, which
contains no language authorizing reductions or waivers. General Counsel has
consistently advised that a new or amended ordinance would be required. Another
reason is that the single residential connection fee was based upon all residential uses
and fees being equal. There could ultimately be a shortfall in connection fee receipts, if
fees were reduced for individual projects without an increase for others. Finally, the
previous philosophy of connection fees was that they were to pay for peak demand and
that peak demand potential was not affected by age or income of occupants.
In 1998, the Board of District No. 7 did allow one congregate care facility to be
designated a "commercial' development and to pay the fee per 1,000 square feet,
rather than the fee per unit for the 87 rooms. In part, this decision was based upon the
inclusion of a recreation room, a small theater, a medical examination room, and a
separate mail room in the facility. Sometimes there are also common dining areas in
these facilities. This decision was project specific, based upon the plans, and did not
alter policy.
The Directors have considered, but rejected, a special fee for residential units of less
than 750 square feet in the past. Adoption of such a fee would be one method of
granting a reduced fee to these low income or senior citizen projects. In the tiered
residential connection fee described above, the connection fee for a one-bedroom unit
would already be one-half of the standard three-bedroom single-family rate, while a
studio apartment would be about one-third. The tiered residential connection fee should
also serve to satisfy the demand for reduced fees for these types of developments.
Govemmental Uses
Historically, local governmental agency buildings have not been charged a connection
fee. (They do pay annual user fees.) These uses include county facilities, public
schools, city halls, fire stations, police stations, etc. Revenue Area 13 is an exception in
which all of these uses are charged connection fees. This exception developed during
the formation of then District No. 13 during the same time period as siting a new county
jail in that area was being considered. State and federal buildings are charged for
connection fees in all Revenue Areas.
Connection Fee Alternatives
Page 9 of 9
May 3, 1999
When a local agency is charged a connection fee, the funds are ultimately provided by
the local taxpayers. They either pay the local agency or they pay the District through
user fees. Thus, the people who benefit from the service pay the fees.
When a regional facility is not charged a connection fee, there is no method in place for
the District to collect user fees from the region. Thus, the capital costs must be
collected from the local users. Charging regional facilities would then require the
regional agency to raise the funds from its service area, which should be broader than
the OCSD Revenue Area affected.
Recommendations
Staff recommends the adoption of a new comprehensive connection fee ordinance
which contains the following elements.
1. Base fees will be determined by type of development and are calculated per 1,000
square feet for non-residential development and per unit for residential development.
2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees will be developed: low demand,
average demand and high demand. The attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee
Schedule shows the rates for each category and a comparison with other agencies.
3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I Permittees) will be charged demand-based
connection fees as a part of their on-going annual use charges, rather than only as a
one-time up-front charge. These fees will include an interest component. The
attached Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule shows the rates per gallon and
per pound that would be charged for additional demand.
4. Residential fees will be tiered based upon number of bedrooms for SFR and MFR
development.
5. Connection fees will continue to be collected by local sewering agencies at the time
the building permit is issued.
6. Credit for demolished structures will be granted only when the developer can prove
that prior connection fees were paid, and credit will be provided only for the amount
actually paid.
7. Connection fees will continue to not be charged for local agency facilities such as
schools and libraries. Connection fees will continue to be charged for state and
federal facilities. Connection fees will begin to be charged for county and regional
facilities that serve more than one OCSD Revenue Area.
8. The fee changes will be phased over the next 24 months.
GGS:Ic
HAwp.dte11iM210brane'FAHRtFahrggWaylConnFeaStafMepol.doo
4130/99 3:32 PM
Proposed OCSD Connection Fee Schedule
Proposed OCSD TypicallExample Comparative Rates
Description or Use Basis Base Rate Current Sacramento LA County Can Contra Prop Type
Rate Co San Dist City of LA San Dist Costa San Calculated
Single Family, 3 bedroom Unit 1.820 2,360 2,768 1,071 1,658 2.572
Multi Family, 2 bedroom Unit 1,275 2,360 2,069 780 995 2,572
Low Demand 1000 sq ft 110 472 476 52 176 350 vvhse
Average Demand 1000 sq ft 675 472 534 441 1,026 759 Office Bldg
High Demand 1000 sq It 1,600 472 1,953 245 2,254 2,719 Shop Ctr
One Time
Significant IndustrlaVCommercial User Daily Fee Eauivalant One Time Fee
Flow Portion gaVday 0.00057 3 5 3 3 7
Boo Portion lb/day 0,14461 811 764 188 143 156
SS Portion Ib/day 0.16025 899 427 171 225 204
Users that are required to obtain a permit from the Source Control
Division,those with regulated or significant discharges would pay the daily
fee as a part of their actual use charge which is caluclated each quarter.
The charge would only apply to discharge above that allocated to the
base rate connection fee. Currently the base use maximums are 25,000
gallons per day and 150 pounds each of Boo and SS.
3:1e%ceLdtaUm1210btroedbld d copy45TRATPLNbonn fee sum4-5
4/30/99 11:56 AM
Connection Fee Structure Implementation
Altemative 1
Proposed Phased Fees
Current Proposed Dollar Percent First Second Third Fourth
Basis Fee Fee Change Change 1/12000 7/1/2000 1/1/2001 7/1/2001
Commercial 1,000 sq It $472
Low Demand 1,000 sq ft $110 ($362) (77%) $380 $290 $200 $110
Average Demand 1,000 sq R 675 203 43% 520 570 620 675
High Demand 1,000 sq It 1,600 1,128 239% 750 1,030 1,310 1,600
Single Family Res Unit 2,360
5+ Bedrooms Unit 2,530 170 7% 2,400 2,440 2,480 2,530
4 Bedrooms Unit 2,165 (195) (8%) 2,310 2,260 2,210 2,165
3 Bedrooms Unit 1,820 (540) (23%) 2,230 2,100 1,970 1,820
2 Bedrooms Unit 1,475 (885) (38%) 2,140 1,920 1,700 1,475
1 Bedrooms Unit 1,130 (1,230) (52%) 2,050 1,740 1,430 1,130
Multi Family Res Unit 2,360
4+Bedrooms Unit 1,965 (395) (17%) 2,260 2,160 2,060 1,965
3 Bedrooms Unit 1,620 (740) (31%) 2,180 2,000 1,820 1,620
2 Bedrooms Unit 1,275 (1,085) (46%) 2,090 1,820 1,550 1,275
1 Bedrooms Unit 910 (1,450) (61%) 2,000 1,640 1,280 910
Studio Unit 580 (1,780) (75%) 1,920 1,480 1,040 580
G:laxcel.dlaVinV1OfeUeedWd1 d Dopy\STRATPLNfconn fee imp All i
4130/99 11:55 AM
Connection Fee Structure Implementation
Phased Increases, Immediate Decreases
Alternative 2
Immediate Phased Increased Fees
Current Proposed Dollar Percent Reduction First Second Third Fourth
Basis Fee Fee Change Change 7/1/1999 1/1/2000 7/1/2000 1/12001 7/1/2001
Commercial 1,000 sq It $472
Low Demand 1,000 sq It $110 ($362) (77%) $110 $110 $110 $110 $110
Average Demand 1,000 sq ft 675 203 43% 472 $520 $570 $620 $675
High Demand 1,000 sq It 1,600 1,128 239% 472 750 1,030 1,310 1,600
Single Family Res Unit 2,360
5+ Bedrooms Unit 2,530 170 7% 2,360 2,400 2,440 2,480 2,530
4 Bedrooms Unit 2,165 (195) (8%) 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165
3 Bedrooms Unit 1,820 (540) (23%) 1,820 1,820 1,820 1,820 1,820
2 Bedrooms Unit 1,475 (885) (38%) 1,475 1,475 1,475 1,475 1,475
1 Bedrooms Unit 1,130 (1,230) (52%) 1,130 1,130 1.130 1,130 1,130
Multi Family Res Unit 2,360
4+ Bedrooms Unit 1,965 (395) (17%) 1,965 1,965 1,965 1,965 1,965
3 Bedrooms Unit 1,620 (740) (31%) 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620
2 Bedrooms Unit 1,275 (1,085) (46%) 1,275 1.275 1,275 1,275 1,275
1 Bedrooms Unit 910 (1,450) (61%) 910 910 910 910 910
Studio Unit 580 (1,780) (75%) 580 580 580 580 580
G`axwI.dta1fiM21fttreedWdd copWRATPLN%x feehnp Alt
4/30199 Impact Of Strategic Plan Connection Fee Implementation Alternatives Page 1 of2
A B C E F G H I J K L
Future Estimated Annual Conn Fee Connection Fee Changes,At 1
Current Percent Development Annual At Current Implement Phased Equally At 6 Months 12 Months
Development To Total To 2020 Development Rates All 711/99 711-12131199 111-6/30100 711-12131100 111-6/30/01 7/1-8/30/02
Single Family Res Units
5+ 20,680 5% 6,731 337 795,320 852.610 397,660 404,400 411,140 417,880 852,810
4 107,653 26% 35,038 1,752 4,134,720 3,793.060 2,067,360 2,023,560 1,979,760 1,935,980 3,793,080
3 167,242 44% 54,433 2,722 6,423,920 4,954,040 3.211,960 3,035,030 2.858,100 2,681,170 4,954,040
2 76,187 20% 24,797 1,240 2,926,400 1,829,000 1.463,200 1,326,800 1.190,400 1,064,000 1,829,000
1 11.678 3% 3,801 190 448,400 214.700 224,200 194,750 165,300 135,850 214,700
Total SFR 383,440 100% 124,800 6,241 14,728,760 11.843,430 7,364,380 6,984,540 6,604,700 6,224,860 11,643,430
Multi Family Res Units
4+ - 0% - - - - - - - -
3 18,583 11% 7,380 369 870.840 597,780 435,420 402,210 369.000 335,790 597,780
2 114,280 66% 45,394 2,269 5,354,840 2,892,975 2,077,420 2,371,105 2,064,790 1.758,475 2,892,975
1 15,098 9% 5,996 300 708,000 273,000 354,000 300,000 246,000 192,000 273.000
0 24,528 14% 9,741 487 1,149,320 282,460 574.660 467,520 360,380 253,240 282,460
Total MFR 172,489 100% 68,500 3,425 8,083,000 4,046,215 4,041,500 3.540,835 3,040,170 2,539,505 4,046,215
Commercial/Industrial Sq Feet
Low Demand 99,244,282 25% 27,729 1.386 654,192 152,460 327,096 263,340 200,970 138,600 152,460
Average Demand 290,099,373 72% 81,053 4,053 1,913.016 2.735,775 956,508 1,053,780 1,155,105 1,256,430 2,735,775
High Demand 13,306,322 3% 3,71B 186 87.792 297,600 43,896 69,750 95,790 121,830 297,600
Total Comm 402,649,977 100% 112,500 5,625 2,655.000 3,185,836 1.327,500 1,368,870 1.451,865 1.516.860 3,185.835
Total Conn Fee 25,466,760 18,875,480 12,733,380 11,912,245 11,096.735 10,281.225 18,875,480
Annual Conn Fee 25,466,760 18,875,480 24,645,625 21,377.960 18,875,480
%Dill From 7/99 Imp 35% 31% 13% 0%
G:lez l.dta1en1210lgreadbM d copy%STRATPLMconn fee Imp 12:03 PM
4130/99 Impact Of Strategic Plan Connection Fee Implementation Alternatives Page 2 of 2
M N O P Q
Connection Fee Changes,Alt 2
Decreases Immediately, Increases At 6 Mo 12 Months
711-12131199 1/1-6/30/00 7/1-12131/00 1/1-6130/01 7/1-6130/02
Single Family Res
5+ 397,660 404,400 411,140 417,880 852.610
4 1,896.540 1,896.540 1.896,540 1.896.540 3.793.080
3 2.477.020 2,477.020 2.477,020 2,477,020 4,954,040
2 914.500 914,500 914,600 914.500 1.829.000
1 107,350 107.350 107,350 107,350 214,700
Total SFR 5,793.070 5.799,810 5.806,550 5,813,290 11.643,430
Multi Family Res
4+ - - - - -
3 298.890 298,890 298,890 298,890 597.780
2 1,446.488 1,446.488 1,446.488 1,446,488 2.892,975
1 136,500 136.500 138,500 136,500 273,000
0 141.230 141,230 141,230 141230 282.460
Total MFR 2,023,108 2.023,108 2,023.108 2.023,108 4,046,215
Commercia9lndustdal
Low Demand 76,230 76,230 76,230 76,230 152.460
Average Demand 956,508 1,053,780 1,155,105 1,256,430 2.735,775
High Demand 43.896 69,750 95,790 121,830 297,600
Total Comm 1,076.634 1,199,760 1,327,125 1,454,490 3,185.835
Total Conn Fee 8.892.812 9.022,678 9.156,783 9,290,888 18,875,480
Annual Conn Fee 17,915,489 18,447,670 18,875,480
% Di6 From 7199 Imp -5% -2% 0%
G:texml.4WtfirA210Ls0ee4W14 C capyWRATPLN nn tee mp 12:03 PM
FAHR COMMITTEE koe,,,r T0s/zaaO r
AGENDA REPORT IOemNumar Itrm MM
4M
is rn
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: ADJUSTING DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION (FAHR99-36)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-06, urging the California Legislature to modify the
"County Sanitation District Act" to increase the maximum monthly compensation
allowed for Directors, under the same or similar provisions as allowed for Directors of
Water Districts and Utility Districts.
SUMMARY
Sanitation District Directors are compensated in accordance with Resolution No.
OCSD 98-3. This Resolution restates the provisions of Section 4733 of the California
Health and Safety Code which allows the District Board to set compensation within
certain limits. Those limits are $100 per day of service, not to exceed $600 per month.
It is interesting to note that the current limits were last changed effective January 1,
1987. Based upon the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Area Average CPI for all urban
consumers, the $100 per meeting in 1987 would be equivalent to $141 today.
The Steering Committee has asked staff and General Counsel to investigate and to
pursue actions necessary to increase these maximums. Toward that end, General
Counsel met last weekend with the California Association of Sanitation Agencies
(CASA) Legislative Committee and Executive Director. CASA expressed its willingness
to support such a legislative effort and to find a sponsor for the bill.
General Counsel will update the Committee at the meeting.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
No impact in 1998-99. Future impact uncertain until a definite change is proposed.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
H 1rq.M gendaV Wagents Repft%I A Ba"N aganea R�11j tloc
Rena g Page 1
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None,
ALTERNATIVES
Take no action and leave compensation as it is.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
H.1'W EduBenEvlBovk Aped.R.p.11.8—.A,e .flepahWi —1y Mr
R-,W enaee Page 2
'6
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-06
ENDORSING PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO INCREASE THE
COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS OF SANITATION
DISTRICTS AND SANITARY DISTRICTS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ENDORSING PROPOSED
LEGISLATION TO INCREASE THE COMPENSATION FOR
DIRECTORS OF SANITATION DISTRICTS AND SANITARY
DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation District Act, California Health & Safety
Code Section 4733, was last amended in 1986, and establishes the rate of
compensation at $100.00 for each meeting, or each day of service, attended or
provided by a member of the governing Board, with a maximum number of
compensable meeting days of 6 per month; and,
WHEREAS, the Sanitary District Act of 1923, California Health & Safety
Code Section 6489, was last amended in 1986, and establishes the rate of
compensation at $100.00 for each meeting, or each day of service, attended or
provided by a member of the governing Board, with a maximum number of
compensable meeting days of 6 per month; and,
WHEREAS, California Water Code Sections 20200, 20201, and 20202
were enacted and amended in 1988 and 1989, to allow the local governing Board
of any Water District to adopt an Ordinance adjusting the compensation paid to
Directors above the fixed amounts provided in the principal acts of such Districts,
with the increase to not exceed an amount equal to 5% per year since the date of
the last adjustment, and for not more than 10 days of service in a calendar
month; and,
WHEREAS, the demands upon the governing Board of Directors often
require members of the Board to attend to District business on more than 6 days
per month; and,
WHEREAS, an adjustment to compensation, with an increase in the
maximum days of service, is fair and equitable to off-set the inconvenience,
hardship, and expense of the individual in providing this service.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
1
i
Section 1: That the State Legislature consider the enactment of
legislation to provide that the governing Board of Directors of a Sanitation
District, or a Sanitary District, be authorized to adopt an Ordinance increasing the
amount of compensation which may be received by members of the governing
Board of either a Sanitation or Sanitary District above the amount of$100.00 per
day, with the increase not to exceed an amount equal to 5%for each calendar
year following the operative date of the last adjustment, and that the authorized
compensation shall not be for more than a total of 10 meetings, or 10 days in a
calendar month.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors
held this 261h day of May, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
2
MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISI-M ENT SYSTEM
COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
May 3, 1999, 8:30 a.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in Conference Room C-2 at the OCWD offices at 8:30 a.m. on
April 26, 1999. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors John Collins, Vice
Chairman,Norman Eckenrode, Peer Swan, and General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alternate;
OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony, Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr., and Iry Pickler, Chairman.
OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr., Alternate was not present. Staff attending were
Tom Dawes, GWR System Project Manager, OCSD staff: Director of Communications Michelle
Tuchman, Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson,Principal Administrative Analyst Greg
Mathews and Principal Engineering Associate Angie Anderson. OCWD staff: Public Information
Officer Ron Wildermuth, Public Affairs Specialist Jennifer Greenlief, Administrative Assistant Till
Everhart, and Assistant District Secretary Janice Durant. Others in attendance included OCWD
Director Kelly Rowe.
1. Minutes of Previous meeting
Upon motion duly seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held
April 26, 1999 were approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
2. Actions on Phase 3 of Public Information Program
GWR System Project Manager Tom Dawes recapped the results of the interviews with the three
finalists for the Phase 3 Public Information Program(Pearce&Associates,Nelson
Communication Group and Adler Public Affairs)that took place at the April 26 GWR System
Committee meeting. After discussion in which Director Eckenrode voiced concerns over the
Committee's concensus that the Nelson Communication Group best meets the Districts' needs,
the following action was taken.
Upon motion by Director Anthony,seconded by Director Collins and carried,with Director
Eckenrode voting"No," the Committee selected Nelson Communication Group to handle
the Phase 3 Public Information Program and staff was requested to negotiate a contract
accordingly and return to the Committee for final approval.
3. Directors Comments
Director Collins invited the Boards to attend a Mayors' Breakfast to be held at 8:00 a.m., May 26
at Fountain Valley Regional Hospital at which Tom Dawes and Ron Wildermuth will present the
GWR System project. He also advised that he intends to show the six-minute GWR System video
at the Fountain Valley City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 4.
4. Public Comments
Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth apprised the Committee of an inquiry by Los Angeles
Times reporter Jean Pasqua] as to the make-up of the GWR System Committee and the costs of
Phases 1 and 2. The Committee requested that it be provided with all material provided to Ms.
Pasqual.
Mr. Wildermuth also updated the Committee on the success of the OCWD Open House on
Saturday, May 1, noting attendance by approximately 400-500 people.
ADJOURNMENT
The Committee adjourned at 9:20 a.m. The next meeting of the Joint GWR System Committee is
scheduled for Tuesday, May 25, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. in Conference Room C-2 at the OCWD
Fountain Valley headquarters, 10500 Ellis Avenue.
r BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeang Date TOBd.or Dir.
6/26199
AGENDA REPORT Item Number 'is 2cDj
Orange County Sanitation DIs(t/ �q(�/��
FROM: Dave Ludwiri, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with Eisenberg, Oliveri and Associates for
the preparation of a Health Risk Assessment in connection with the Groundwater
Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed $225,690, with
Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal
shares in the amount of$112,845.
SUMMARY
Staff has received a proposal to conduct a study of the risk to human health associated
with the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System). The study, proposed by
Eisenberg, Oliveri and Associates (EOA), of Oakland, California, will compare the
relative risk to human health from exposure to drinking water with and without the GWR
System. The cost of the Health Risk Assessment is $225.690. It is anticipated that the
final report will be available twelve months after receipt of the Notice to Proceed.
The recommended action, award of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with
EOA, was approved by the GWR System Joint Agency Committee on April 13, 1999.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem:Water Management Projects, a)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A Request for Proposal for a Health Risk Assessment (Risk Assessment)was prepared
by Staff, and mailed to Eisenberg, Oliveri and Associates (EOA) of Oakland, California.
EOA has conducted numerous studies on the health effects associated with the use of
reclaimed water, including the health risk assessment for the City of San Diego's Water
Repurification Project and the Total Recovery Project. The Risk Assessment will
GMWIobaWenda Dne R*Pft alnt eea,MISa AR MON.Uot
Page 1
address comments on the draft Environmental Impact Report that pertain to the r
possible risk to public health.
EOAs approach to the Risk Assessment was based on the Scope of Work prepared by
Staff in February 1999. This Scope of Work was subsequently reviewed by Dr. Douglas
Crawford-Brown, of the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. Dr. Brown concluded that the Risk Assessment would provide all of the
information needed to assess the public health risks from the project.
The key element of the Risk Assessment will be the comparison of the relative risk to
human health from exposure to drinking water with and without the Groundwater
Replenishment System. The methodology, draft final results and final report will be
reviewed by an Independent Advisory Committee (IAC), comprised of experts in the
field of water quality. Ex-officio members to the IAC will include representatives of
California Department of Health Services, The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board, a representative from the office of Congressman Brown, among others.
It is anticipated that the duration of the Risk Assessment will be twelve months.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives.
CEQA FINDINGS
Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
JDH:jak
\`cobattWata1NtglobalWgenda Draft ReportsUoint BoardsU.36 AR OSM99.dot
c NtambaM,,enez Dnn ko,oftUort aoab W JS AR M2M am
Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE)
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
JOB NO. J-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO THIS AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%)
Project Development S 700,ODD $ 700,ODD S 700,000 S 44 .50D $ 112,845 S 553,345 $ 4DD,900 72%
DeslnStaf $ 234900D $ 2,349,ODO $ 2.349,000 $ 2349.000 S 2,349,DDO S 180000 8%
Design Consullanl
PSAs $ 7500,ODO $ 7,5009W S 7500900 $ $
Conatrudlon Other S 2,653.900 $ 2,653,900 S 2.653,900 S $
Conslruclion Staff S 9,345,600 $ 9,345,600 S 9,345.600 $ S
Construction Contract S 66461500 $ 86481,500 $ 86,48150D $ $
CoMln en $ 12895.000 S 12895,000 $ 12M," S $
TOTAL $ 121,925,ODO $ 121,925,000 f - $ 121925,000 $ 2,789,SW S 112,845 S 2.902.345 $ 560,900 20%
H%y dIsW9V0BS A CONTIR TS ,36%36 BUDGET TABLE AN36 ASIDi Ir,cM
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Re ng Date I To atl.o Dlr.
5/26'199
AGENDA REPORT IMM Number Item u
i
Orange County Sanitation DisW
FROM: David Lud ' , hector of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Communications Group for
public relations services for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the
Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed
$199,895, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District
having equal shares in the amount of$99.947.50.
SUMMARY
In February 1999, the Joint Ground Water Replenishment System (GWR System)
Cooperative Committee authorized a team of staff members from Orange County
Sanitation District (OCSD) and Orange County Water District(OCWD) to solicit
proposals to provide public relations services for Phase III of the Public Information
Program for the GWR System project. Five proposals were received and were rated by
the same OCSD/OCWD staff team that solicited the proposals. The staff team chose
the three top firms for interviews. The team then ranked the three firms based on their
proposals and the interview process. The ranking was:
1. Nelson Communications Group
2. Lear Pearce & Associates
3. Adler Public Affairs
Based on the evaluations of the three selected firms, the Joint GWR System
Cooperative Committee recommends award of a Professional Services Agreement
(PSA) for Phase III of the Public Information Program for the GWR System, Job
No. J-36, to Nelson Communications Group.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The PSA amount and budget necessary for this project are presented in the attached
Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: CORF Water Management Projecls.a)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In February 1999, the Joint (GWR) System Cooperative Committee authorized staff to
prepare and send out Request for Proposals (RFP) for Phase III of the Public
Information Program. The first two phases included considerable research and
development of the "theme," and guidance for the now completed environmental work.
Staff sent RFPs to 16 individuals and firms and received five proposals. The same
OCWD/OCSD staff team that prepared the RFP and Scope of Work received and rated
the proposals and then opened the separate, sealed price proposals.
The five proposals and the proposed fee are as follows:
Firm Fee
Adler Public Affairs $151,610
Leer Pearce and Associates $247,040
McDaniel Lambert, Inc. $190,850
Nelson Communications Group $199,895
Spinner/LaMar $234,325
The seven-member staff team evaluated the proposals on several criteria, including:
• Creative problem solving and innovative approaches
• Ability to deal with controversial programs, especially an expertise in successfully
dealing with the opposition
• Local experience in providing similar public relations services
• Strong Orange County presence and experience working with Orange County
audiences (community, media, government, environmental groups, etc.)
• Knowledge of and experience with Orange County's political culture
• Knowledge of and experience in working with health regulators and local
governmental officials
• Experience with large, multi-faceted public infrastructure projects
• Price Proposals
• Completeness of response in accordance with RFP instructions
• Strength of presentation
Based on the scores obtained by submitting firms on the written proposal, the three
highest scores were recommended to move forward to the oral presentation stage. The
three recommended firms, listed in alphabetical order, are as follows:
• Adler Public Affairs
• Lear Pearce and Associates
• Nelson Communications Group
These firms participated in oral interviews on April 15, 1999, conducted by the
OCSD/OCWD staff team. The Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee was invited
to sit in on the interviews.
Page 2
After the evaluation of the oral presentations, a final score was calculated. The final
score was weighed fifty/fifty: 50 percent, the written proposal score; and 50 percent,
the oral presentation score. Based on the scores and supporting information, the Joint
GWR System Cooperative Committee recommends that Nelson Communications
Group be awarded the PSA for Phase III of the Public Information Program.
ALTERNATIVES
Any alternative action would require consideration by the Joint Cooperative Committee
and the OCWD Board.
CECIA FINDINGS
Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
JDH:jak:jo
GMtgloMMg¢nca DmR RepoftWint Boardi AR Public Info PSA.Eot
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE (OCSD 50% SHARE)
Groundwater Replenishment System
JOB/CONTRACT NO. J-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTR THIS AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTALASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%)
Project Development $ 70 ,000 $ 7WEW $ 700,000 $ 440,500 9994750 $ 540,448 $ 400900 74%
Design Staff $ 2,349,000 S 2,349,000 $ 2,349,000 $ 2,349,000 $ 2,349,000 $ 180,000 8%
Design Consultant
PSAs $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500, 0 $ 7,S00,000 $ $
Construction(Other) $ 2,653,900 $ 2,653,900 $ 2,653,900 $ $
Construction Staff $ 9,345,600 $ 9,3456W $ 9,345,600 $ $
Construction Contract $ 86,481.500 $ 86,4815W $ 86,481,5D0 -i $ $
Contingency $ 12,895,000 $ 12,895.O $ 12,895,000 $ $
TOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 121925,000 5 - $ 121925,000 $ 2,789,500 99,947.50 $ 2,809,448 $ 580,900 20%
F\vm.Elabn bEb
Form RevseE IVI7198 IYI)98
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Me To et&D .
5-j 99
AGENDA REPORT emNumW Ie��mbe
Orange County Sanitation Districctt /
FROM: David Lud 1 i, Di/]rector of Engineering
Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT,
CONTRACT NO. 7-28
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve plans and specifications with one addenda for RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell
Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, on file at the office of the Board
Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a
contract to Mladen Grbavac Construction, for RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue
Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, for an amount not to exceed $191,604.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-28 were completed in February 1999.
The designer for this project is DGA Consultants, Inc.
The plans and specifications for this project, RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, were bid on May 6, 1999.
Project Budget $395,000
Construction Budget $200,000
Engineer's Estimate $200,000
Low Responsible Bid $191,604
High Bid $261,744
Number of Bids 4
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The original engineers estimate for construction was $200,000. This budget request
authorizes $191,604 for the construction contract, plus $5,000 for other construction
such as cost of permits for the City, etc., and $49,000 for the total estimated cost for
staff inspection and construction management.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (19e8-99 Budget Capital Projects zone 7, tine i)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
G N1pbMNyeMa UnR Re{arbUanl&urbl]3T]-]9 Nt Ed
RT Rom, Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The RA 6 "B" Street and Mitchell Avenue B-inch VCP sewer was built by a private
developer in 1963 and was turned over to the District. Recently, maintenance crews
found they have had trouble cleaning the main line sewer on "B" Street and Mitchell
Avenue.
A contractor was hired to perform a TV inspection of the sewer. Upon completion of the
TV inspection, they found that the main line sewer had offset joints from %�inch to f-
inch difference in elevation. Infiltration of ground water and heavy roots were also found
in the mainline sewer. Laterals were also found to be offset by Ya-inch to 1-inch in
elevation with infiltration of ground water. Some sections in the main line sewer were so
damaged the camera could not pass through, indicating that the main line sewer has a
very large sag.
This project will replace the existing 8-inch VCP main line sewer with a new 8-inch
sewer line. It will also reconnect existing 4-inch laterals to the new sewer.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives.
CEQA FINDINGS
Notice of Exemption was filed on April 8, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
RLC:jak:jo
GMIgIob@Mgende Draft ReportsUoint BoardeV-M28 AR.dot
G W&b.M .nd.Dr.n R.o ..dm a ,m17.2.7.29 eR am
R-.dd eaarea Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
RA 6 'B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT
CONTRACT NO. 7-28
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 3.000 $ 3.000 $ 3.000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 100%
Design Staff $ 50.000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50.000 $ 8.500 17%
Consultant PSA $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25.000 1 $ 25,000 1 $ 25,000 $ 2,943 12%
VConstructiontract $ 200.000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 191604 $ 191,604 0%
er $ 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 5000 $ 5,000 0%
$ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 49000 $ 49.000 0%
$ 63,000 $ 63.000 $ 63,000 $ 0%
$ 395.000 $ 395,000 Is - $ 395,000 1 1 $ 78,000 1 $ 245,604 1 $ 323,604 $ 14,443 4%
H:*p.EbWn9VOB58 CONTR CT50-28V-28 Budget Table.vlslMetricts
May 6, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 1
BID TABULATION
RA 6 "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE SEWER REPLACEMENT
Contract No. 7-28
Engineers Estimate: $200.000 Construction Contract Budget: S200,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Mladen Grbavac Construction $ 191,604
2. GCI Construction, Inc. $ 219,786
3. Mike Prlich and Sons Inc. $ 244,984
4. Savala Construction Co., Inc. $ 261,744
5. $
6. $
7. $
8. $
9. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid
is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Mladen Grbavac Construction in
the bid amount of$191,604 as the lowest best bid.
i
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
\Vadonwatal iwp.dtawngU08S 8 CONTRACTSI7-28V-28 Bid Tab.doc
Rewsad 05119198
OCSD a P.O.Bar 8127 a Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-8127 a (714) 962-2411
FINANCIAL &
OPERATIONAL REPORT
�r.
r
J'ZV SA N IT4)Cy
\ ti
eC CJ O
Third Quarter ended
March 31 , 1999
Orange County Sanitation District, California
Table of Contents
Section1 - Overview........................................................................................................1
Financial Report-
Section 2 - Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review
r
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge............................................................2
r Comparison of Expenses by Department...................................................................3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category.................................................................4
Summary of Joint Operating Revenue by Line Item...................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process ...........................................................8
Chartof Staffing Trends .............................................................................................9
r
Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Review
Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Current Year..........2
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life.............8
Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area
V
Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas ........................................................1
Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review............................:.............................................2
Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3
Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review..........................................................................4
Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5
Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6
Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7
_ Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8
Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9
Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10
Section 5 - Self Insurance Budget Review
r General Liability Fund Budget Review .......................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review...........................................................2
�r Operational Report
Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1
ti
r
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
�1
w
ll
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
IV
L
J
LI
LI
J
U
LJ
r
Overview
r
Third Quarter Financial & Operational Report
March 31, 1999
r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1998-99 third quarter
comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial
and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the
r Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial
condition of the District; reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress; and
providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1998-99 performance
objectives as established in the 1998-99 adopted budget. A summary of the sections
contained within this report is provided below.
r Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review: At March 31, 1999, 70.14
percent, or $31,701,000, of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of $45.2 million has
been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 1.21 percent, or $378,800 from the
same period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 1999 is $476.56 based on flows of
66,521.09 million gallons, or 243 million gallons per day. This is 1.87 percent, or $9
below the budgeted cost per million gallons of $485.63 while flows are 4.8 percent
lower than budgeted.
The following are some of the significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 1999:
• Salaries and Wages - Personnel costs were at 78.24 percent of budget through
March 31 while staffing was 30.5 full-time equivalents, or 5.6 percent below the total
542.5 full-time equivalents approved in the 1998-99 budget. Personnel costs were
slightly higher than anticipated through the third quarter due to (1) the distribution of
annual bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2) the
early retirement and associated accrued leave payoff for 20 employees, and (3)
annual leave payoffs distributed in the first three quarters. Cost savings associated
with the early retirements will be realized in 1999-00 and thereafter.
• Office Expense — Supplies — The costs for office supplies are at $113,000, or 85.4
percent of budget as a result of the need for new letterhead, envelopes, and
business cards due to the consolidation of the District and associated change in the
District's name.
Small Computer Items — The costs for small computer items are at $205,000, or
84.7 percent of budget as a result of the timing of the purchases of these items. It
is anticipated that small computer items will be within budget at year-end.
• Notices & Ads — The costs for notices and ads are at $17,000, or 126 percent of
budget due to the unexpected search for two Executive Management positions.
Section 1 - Page 1
J
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
U
• Trainin -The costs for training are at $245,000, or 29.2 percent of budget. During
the first part of the year, the training program went through restructuring and
planning for FY 1998-99. Staff has scheduled several centralized training classes
and expenses will increase in the last quarter of 1998-99.
• Odor Control - Although the costs for odor control are only at 60.63 percent of
budget, the actual expenses of $1,057,800 are $27,400 greater than at March 31, u
1998. In addition, odor control costs should increase at a higher rate in the fourth
quarter over the third quarter in that more chemicals are used in the wanner
months.
• Gasoline. Diesel & Oil - The costs for gasoline, diesel and oil are at $186,000, or
91.1 percent of budget due to the timing of when purchases are made. These items
are purchased in bulk which staff anticipates will last five to eight months. The
majority of the bulk purchases was made in September 1998 and March 1999 and -,
should now last until the end of the fiscal year. v
• Contractual Services — Other — The costs for other contractual services are only at LI
$517,000, or 28.3 percent of budget due to the delay in the start of projects. Much of
the budget was for painting the plant process areas which is being performed in the
fourth quarter.
• Professional Services -The costs for professional services are only at $970,000, or C�
49.9 percent of budget due primarily to the unanticipated Y21K effort and the
postponement of other projects.
• Research & Monitoring - The costs for research and monitoring are only at U
$1,301,000 or 57.0 percent of the $2,285,000 budget, because the biosolids and
strategic process studies will not be completed until the fourth quarter. -
• Repairs and Maintenance - Materials and Services - Repairs and maintenance
costs are at $2,500,000, or 91.7 percent of budget. During the budget process, it
was determined that certain items of maintenance could be deferred to future years. L
Subsequently, staff discovered that a number of those items could no longer be
postponed. This account is expected to exceed the original budget by year-end, but
funds from other accounts will cover the excess.
• Service Maintenance Agreements - Costs for service maintenance agreements are
at $579,000, or 49.4 percent of budget primarily due to the timing of when these L
agreements are renewed. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end.
• Telephone - The costs for telephones are at $152,000, or 53.6 percent of budget
because charges for the new T-1 line will not be incurred until the fourth quarter of
1998-99; however, these charges were budgeted to be incurred for the whole year.
V
Section 1 - Page 2
W
r
Overview
r
•+ Water — Water costs are only at $608,000, or 62.3 percent of budget because the
expected increase in the price of Green Acres Project water has not been realized.
It is anticipated that water expenses at the end of the year will approximate
•• $850,000, or 87 percent of the 1998-99 budget.
• Insurance Premiums — The costs for insurance premiums are at $791,000, or 54.2
percent of budget due to the timing of when the budget is prepared versus when
insurance quotes are provided by brokers. The budget was prepared assuming that
insurance premiums would increase. Instead, actual insurance premiums have
" decreased and will only total $1.2 million, or 82 percent of budget, at year-end.
• Variances in the Exoenses by Treatment Process from the Prior Year — The major
changes in the treatment process expenses from the prior year are primarily due to
the reallocation of staff, and redefining process related expenditures in an effort to
improve the classifications of treatment process costs.
r
• Variances in Direct and Indirect Cost Allocations — In total, direct and indirect cost
r allocations to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund and to the Revenue Areas for both
salaries and employee benefits and materials, supplies, and services totaled
$12,614,000, $2,191,000 more than the prior year. Of this $2,191,000 increase,
$844,000 represents costs allocated to the Y2K effort. Another $453,000
represents power, repair and custodial service costs for collection maintenance that
are first charged to the Joint Operating Fund and then allocated to the individual
" Revenue Areas. An accounting change was made in order to assist the division
manager with managing his budget. The remaining difference of $894,000 is from
further retirements in the District's cost allocation plan.
r
r
r
Section 1 - Page 3
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallons Results
With Year-End Actuals (Budget) - Last Five Years
550
arra"
mn
M1. 6>65e a0.5.6]
soo +ss.n
moo �
650.15
450
w
00
are
350
69.95 05 uc.o, a' on.m
W Year 39d Year W Year 3rd Year 3rd Annudl
Orr end O1, end Oar em Or, end OI, Budder
As highlighted in the graph shown above, the cost per million gallons at the end of the
third quarter has been within three percent of the year-end actual for the past four
years. The cost comparison for 1998-99 is consistent with this trend as staff projects
the year-end cost per million gallons to approximate the budget of $485.63.
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter, as budgeted for 1998-99, and
as actually incurred through the third quarter of 1997-98. All three charts are quite
similar showing little change between the prior year third quarter actual, current year
budget and current year third quarter actual.
For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional `1
contributions to the gallonage charge through the third quarter for the last five years;
Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for March 31,
1997, 1998, and 1999; Section 2 - Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major
category through March 31, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 - Page 5 provides a summary of
Joint Operating Revenues by line item through March 31, 1999 and 1998; Section 2 —
Pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through March 31, 1999 `
and 1998; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process
through March 31, 1999, and 1998; and Section 2 - Page 9 provides staffing trends
over the last five years including total authorized, actual staffing positions filled, and ..
vacant staffing positions.
w
Section 1 - Page 4
Overview
Capital Improvement Program Review:
seo,aoo,000
S70,000.000 —
S60,000,000
s50.000.000
540,000,000
S30,000,000
s2o,ow000
S10,000,000
r so
03131199 Actual Projected 1998-99 -Originally Estimated
Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 1998-99 Capital
$29,463,780 549,035,620 Outlay-572,185,790
At March 31, 1999, total Capital Improvement Program expenses totaled $29,463,780,
or 40.8 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1998-99, as depicted by the
chart above. Costs are low through the third quarter as many projects for 1998.99 are
still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. As a result, the total
Capital Improvement Program expenses as of June 30, 1999 are projected to be $49
million, $23 million or 32.1 percent below the original budget.
Section 3 — Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each District's share of the total amount of the capital outlay
requirements incurred through March 31.
For more detailed information, Section 3 - Pages 2 through 7 provide a summary of the
capital improvement construction requirements of each project for the current year, and
Section 3 — Pages 8 through 13 provide a summary of the construction requirements of
each project over the project life.
r
r
Section 1 - Page 5
1998-99 Third Quarter Report L
Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At March 31, 1999, revenues from all Revenue L
Areas totaled $86.4 million, or 65.4 percent of budget. Other (User) Fees, the largest
revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, are at$42.5 million, or 57.6 percent of
the $73.8 million budget. There are two primary reasons for this shortfall. The first L
reason is due to the $4 million in sewer user fees refunded to commercial users.
These refunds, which in most cases go back four years, were provided to commercial
users who provided documentation that their actual usage was less than what was L
calculated by the District's square footage formulas. The second reason is that the
District does not receive our largest property tax and user fee allocation for the current
fiscal year from the County until April. Likewise, no Sale of Capacity Rights, budgeted
at $50,000, have been received because these revenues are also not due to the District
until April of 1999. Interest and Miscellaneous Revenue are at $17.1 million, or 82.8
percent of budget, due to the higher than expected rate of return on the District's L
investment portfolio of 6.1 percent. Connection fees are at$5.7 million, or 84.8 percent
of budget, due to a higher than expected increase in building activity.
L
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $91.0 million, or 57.9 percent of
budget at March 31, 1999. District Operating and Other Expenditures, budgeted at f I
$9.3 million, are only at $4.9 million, or 53.0 percent of budget primarily because the W
majority of the line cleaning work to be done is scheduled for the fourth quarter of each
fiscal year. District Trunk Sewer Construction costs, budgeted at $22.9 million, are only
at $9.9 million, or 43.3 percent of budget and the Share of Joint Work Treatment Plant L
costs, budgeted at $49.3 million, are only at $29.7 million, or 39.7 percent of budget.
These shortages are primarily due to the award of fewer than expected construction
projects. Conversely, COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at $30.4 W
million, are high at $25.0 million, or 82.0 percent of budget because the majority of the
principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal year. 'I
w
Sell-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers'
Compensation and for General Liability claims in excess of $25 million. Separate fund
accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing Lt
these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area
contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid,
claims administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues as of March 31, 1999 totaled $566,700, or 102
percent of budget and total expenses were $861,000, or 95.7 percent of budget. These
actual amounts are high when compared to the budgeted amounts due to the
settlement of the Walcon Construction claim during the second quarter of FY 1998-99. L
Operational Review.,The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains
to the status of Performance Objectives as of March 31, 1999.
J
Section 1 - Page 6 1 -
Ll l
Overview
r
r Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and
incorporated into the 1998-99 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance
measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured,
achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to
further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's
critical goals for 1998-99, workplans were also developed at the divisional level.
r
At March 31, 1999, 81 percent of the District's performance objectives and 70 percent
of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. Significant staff
r resources have been reassigned to ensure the District's smooth computer transition to
the year 2000 and this redeployment has caused some workplan projects to be
deferred until next fiscal year.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
rN
Section 1 - Page 7
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
LU
V
V
v
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
L
u
Y-1
N
V
4
Section 1 - Page 8
V
--
xxx
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
exx Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Nine Months Ended March 31. 1999
Enginee Ing 0aM
GSA
_ la%
Finance
Comm
Into Tech
a. ax
Exec.Mgm1
2% Tech Svcs H/R
15% 2%
x.x
Departmental Gallonage Charges
1998-99 Budget
xxx
Engineering
9
06M
GSP 5,
ad g .
Pn
co
In,
Farn
s%
Exec.Mg.[
3% Tech.Svcs WR
• 15% 3%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Nine Months Ended March 31. 1998
Engineering 0 6 M
1% 59a.
GSA
a9:
- Finance
64
Comm
ext Ix
Info Tech
a%
Exec.Mgm1
2% Tech,S. WA
16% 3%
r
Section 2—Page t
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
L
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge V
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
3131195 Sr31/96 3MI197 W31/98 lasses IWI/99
Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual 9ud9et Actual L
R.iv MR11-f-vlln. 97 WRI n! N&O A71.VM MSw Tl M07SITI F4S'J1M
General Managers Deprt w. 16.17 8.48 11.85 9.59 13.72 9.33 U
camnunirallone 6.41 11.16 533 6.35 5.10
Human nesoumas Date,Is a
Human Pesou oas 10.66 1.51 6.59 4.63 4.43 3.80
Eo(cetion&Training - 4.78 4.92 6.13 8.67 523
Safety&Emergency Response 2.76 5.12 3.93 5.17 3.60
TOW 10.66 9.05 1&63 K69 18.27 1263 1
Finance Department
Prance Atlalastration 14.86 20.09 18.52 1623 18.78 K71
Acamn0ng 6.75 12D 1025 10.01 10.88 10.87
Pum asig&Werehousing &77 6.47 6.79 &46 6.86 am
Tole) 27.38 35.85 2555 31.-M 36.52 3213 L
General SerNoes Depnment _
General SeMoss Acbnntstralon 1P12 5.61 6.39 4.35 4.97 4,64 1
Colleadw Facilities MaintenanceL 2.40 1.66 1.38 1.80 2.95 &07
Halt Fadtiaes Mar4er1a1ca 3242 3&34 38.36 35.96 43.65 4&89
T01a 46.94 43.61 46.12 42.11 51.47 5&80
Information Technology Department i
I.T.Adimnlslratlon - - - - 271 1.91 Y/
User Support - 6.22 4.24 &87 0.27 4,00
mom*Support - 9.12 6.45 7.13 8.10 472 y I
Programing&Database - - - - 328 294 Y
Nam Automation 3.39 3ffi = 492
Told 15.a4 14.02 1782 2&59 1849
Operations&Ma11,18 noe Deprtnvmt I
Opm&ManL AANnlsbalon 1037 2.82 1.95 2.30 234 208 Y.1
O&MProcesssupprt - 7.95 7.99 6.92 7.63 4.17
Nam No.1 Opralbrs - 79.43 76.85 67.95 66.88 7227 j
Part W.2 Operations - 124.16 100.93 93.84 93.45 e821 L
Mechanical Manienaoe 53.93 54.04 45.59 19.04 47.61 SDM
Electrical&Instrumentation MM. eO2 41.87 41.74 48.62 49.99 47.62
Air Welty&Spode Prge% - &M 414 6.55 6.60 6.13 1 I
Canal Gal bons - 24.06 25.78 28.56 29.73 27.85 4�a
Ram Operations 15320
Total 282ffi 340.65 303.97 3IXiB6 304.13 30872 -
Technical Services Depa,Is a
Technical Souses Administration, 2.06 5.83 6.56 7.35 7.16 7.11
ErMnminn aMaagement 103.92 40.18 41.39 36.88 38.10 31.14
Emtromrenla We n es laboratory 3333 37.10 31.03 30.35 31.97 31.37
Soave Control 9.11 3.41 1,13 4.88 3.811 270 lal
Total 148.42 Sam 83.11 79.44 79.03 7232
Engineering DepNnant
Engnen.4ng Atimnlstrstion 0.97 0.02 0.01 - - 020 j
Planning&Design 1.84 1.10 1.08 121 1.00 0.60 V
Construction Management 241 0.49 121 0.65 4,19
Total 4.82 1.12 15a 2.41 1.65 4.99 1
Total Joint Operating Expenses 517.01 54&93 Siam 501346 536.73 519.31 L
lass:Revenues (439T (44131 (37.821 (56J3m (51.101 (4&M
Net Joint Operating Expenses 473.04 911.8D 481.17 450.15 485.63 476M
L
Section 2- Page 2
II
L
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
1998-99
3/31197 3/31NB Revised year to Data Budget%
Deoarbnent and Division Actual Actual Budget 3/31199 Realized
General Managers Department 795,319 667,489 1,276,850 620,552 48.60%
Communications 413,372 371.178 590600 339.032 57.40%
Human Resources Department
Human Resources 442.328 32ZO40 412.540 252.845 6129%
r Education&Training 330298 426,441 806.600 348,162 43.16%
Safety&Emergency Response 343503 273210 481,350 239761 49.81%
Total 1,116,129 1,021,691 1,700,490 840768 49.44%
Finance Department
Finance Administration 1,243,180 1.129.348 1,748,350 978,585 55.97%
Accounting 688,441 696,197 1,012,750 722.793 71.37%
Purchasing&Warehousing 455,157 380,197 638940 435,859 6822%
r Total 2.386.T78 2,205,742 3.400.040 2.137237 62.86%
General Services Department
General Services Administration 428,344 302,408 453,370 308,582 68.06%
r
Collection Facilities Maintenance 92,499 125,170 274,150 337257 123.02%
Plant Facilities Maintenance 2.575,737 2.502.271 4.083.030 3,052,546 75.13%
Total 3,096,580 2,929,849 4.790.650 3,698,385 7720%
Information Technology Department
,w I.T.Administration - 252.S90 126,963 5026%
User Support 284,903 478238 58318D0 266,320 45.62%
Network Support 432.983 496,967 753,970 313.814 41.62%
.,. Programing&Database - - 3D3,390 195247 64.36%
Plant Automaton 223,70D 265,512 488220 327,550 67.09%
Total 941.586 1239.707 2,381,970 1,229,894 51.63%
Operations 6 Maintenance Department
�r Opns&Maint. Administration 131,174 165,639 217.376 138257 63.60%
O&M Prornss Support 536257 481,502 700,425 277,191 39.57%
Plant No.1 Operations 5,092.619 4.728,197 6225,110 4,807.491 7723%
ti Plant No.2 Operations 6.776,301 6,530,107 8.691 190 6,534268 75.12%
Mechanical Maintenance 3,061.097 3,412.606 4,431,080 3,365,560 75.95%
Electrical&Instrumentation Mice. 2,802,580 3,383D44 4.652,940 3.167,873 68.08%
Air Quality&Special Projects 278.080 455,825 614,030 407,656 66.39%
.+ Central Generation 1,730593 1,987,064 2766,850 1,839,236 66.47%
Total 20,408,641 21,143,974 2B,308,0D0 20,537,532 72.56%
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 440,715 511,118 666,800 472,715 70.89%
Environmental Management 2,778,971 2,564,947 3,359,9D0 2,071.193 61-64%
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,083,049 2,111,587 Z976250 2.086.463 70.13%
Source Control M,068 339.453 354.000 179.745 50.78%
Total 5,579,803 5,527,105 7.355.950 4.810.116 65.39%
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 527 101 130 13278 10213.85%
Planning&Design 72,836 84.425 92,920 39,833 42.65%
Construction Management 32,965 83.472 80,600 278,676 459.86%
Total 106,328 167,99B 153,650 331,597 215.81%
Total Joint Operating Expenses 34,844,536 35274,733 49,956,100 34,545,103 89.15%
Less: Revenues (2.539237) (3,952,169) (4,766,100) (2,84S734) SS79%
Net Joint Operating Expenses 32.305299 31.322.566 45,200,000 31,701,369 70.14%
,.d
Section 2—Page 3
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report `w
W
Summary of Expenses by Major Category
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 '
Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent
V
Budget Thru Thru (Decrease) (DWMW) Budget Remaining
Description 1OW99 3/31/99 3/31190 3 % Realized Butloet
Net Salary,Wages&Benefits 23.918,240 18264,598 18,361,862 (97,264) (0.53) 76.36 5,653,642
Atlminiehetive Expenses 713,880 520.209 372,869 147,560 39.80 72.87 193,671 �
Printing&Publication 343.000 245,755 233,241 12,514 5.37 71.65 97.245
Training&Meetings 1,075,100 387,345 617,553 (230.208) (37.28) 36.03 687,755 V
Operating Expenses 5,371,380 3,568,133 3,634,426 (66292) (1.82) 66.43 1,803,247 I
b+
contractual Services 7,044,050 4290,814 4,046,648 243,968 6.03 60.91 2,753.436
Professional Services 1,897,000 941,802 969,787 (27,985) (2.89) 49.65 955.198
ReBaaroh&Monitoring 2,284,500 1,301,076 1,858,951 (557,875) (30.01) 66.95 983,424
Repairs&Maintenance 3,899,040 3,079,221 2,794,691 284,530 10.18 78.97 819,819
uti0ties 3,742,450 2,512,370 2,270,779 241,591 10.64 67.13 1230,080
Other Materiels,Supplies, 6w
and Services 2,580,360 1,369,516 1,540,715 (171,199) (11.11) 53.07 1210,844
Cost AllocCon&Other (2,912.90m (1235536) 11A26,5661 (508.9701 35.68 66.45 1977.36d1 �I
W
Total Joint Operating Expense 49,956,100 34.545,103 35,274,733 (729,630) (2.07) 69.15 15,410,997
Revenues&Offsets (4,756,1001 (2.843.734) (3,952,1691 1,108,435 (28.05) 59.79 (1.912.3611 Lr
Net Joint Operating Expense 45.200.000 31.701.369 31.322.564 378.805 1.21 70.14 13,498,631
Gallonage Flow(MG) 93.075.00 66.521.09 69.582.72 (3,062) (4,40)
Gallonage Flow(MGD) 255.00 242.78 253.95 (11) (4,401 I
GeIl00age Flow($'8/MG) 485.63 476.56 459./5 26 5.87 '
1.+
Iw
L
Section 2-Page 4 -
W
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
%
yr Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Inm
Budget Th. Th. Remaining thru (Decrease) (Dapnaee)
Description 1999.99 =1199 =1199 Budget mime $ %
Inter District Sewer use 2,175,000 935,368 43.01 1,239,632 2,068.872 (1,123,504) (54.57)
Wastehauler 400,000 327.973 81.99 72.027 272.730 55,243 20.26
r Sludge Disposal 900.000 511.625 56.85 388.375 742,322 (230.697) (31.08)
Scrap Sales 20.000 67 0.34 19,933 - 67 -
a+ Other Sales 5,000 7,736 154.72 (2,736) 3,369 4.377 130.31
Rents B Leases 100,000 119,156 119.16 (19,156) 87,414 31,742 38.31
r General Non-Operating 50.000 33,928 67.86 16,072 - 33.928 -
Vehicle 8 Equipment 350,000 223,695 63.91 126,305 262,634 (38,939) (14.83)
Sampling Charges 286,100 244,462 85.45 41,638 219,061 25,401 11.60
r
Power Sales 470.000 4.39.724 93.56 30.276 305.777 133.947 43.81
Total Joint Operating Revenues 47 61 2.843.T34 59.79 — 12.366 3.952.169 11.108.4351 2 5
r
r
yr
Section 2-Page 5
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report �u
Summary of Expenses by Line Item L'
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Expense %Expense Expense Ingoase Increase
Budget Th Thru Remanng Thu (Deaeae) (Dopvaae)
Octaio6on 1998-99 331199 3131M a~ 3098 s %
Samna,w qm x w fik
Saades&Wages 31,173,440 24,388,831 78.24 6,7K8D9 23,451,384 937,447 4.00
Employee Benefits:PeanensN I I
2,497,900 2,009,737 80.46 488.163 1 L,565,548 444,189 28.37
Group Ircvrbnce
Group lmu� 2758700 2,M,5% 8212 493,192 1,9W,748 271,760 13M
Tuition%ffbase rtt - 62FS9 WA (62,559) am (35.7M (36.361 L
ltrulmm RmW 60.3W 48204 79.94 12096 41,548 6.656 16A2
Workers Cmpw*Ww 219,000 164249 75.00 54,751 160,770 3,479 2.16
Ursmployment Insurance 39200 4,142 10.57 WAS 46,954 (42,812) (91.16)
Total Benefits 5575,100 4554M 81.69 1.=701 3,906,866 647.5M 1657 w
Salaries Wages,&Benefits 36,748.540 28,943230 78.76 7,805,310 27,358250 1,584,980 5.79
Salaries&Ben Alloc.
Oirectl Indirect MlooCod/Oi9 112,830.300) (10,678,632) 8323 (2.151.668) (8996.388) (1,682,244) 18.70
Nel Salary,Wages&Benefits 23,918,240 18264.598 76.36 5,653,642 18361,862 (97,351) 10511 1i
a supply s
Afnimstrati"Spur -.
Nenttershps 139.420 109,393 78,46 30(127 64,593 44.800 69.38 u
Office Ep-Supplies 132,810 113389 8638 19,421 95,407 17.912 1806
Ofilw Expense-Ofher 124,520 69.105 55.50 55.415 71,132 (2oz7) am
Srrsll Conputer lteos 242250 205,123 84.67 37.127 121,755 83.368 OUT
Mnor Fun tote.Fottim,etc 74,890 23,199 30.9E 51.681 1%762 Z437 17.W nr
Ring&Publication -.
Relxo-lnHdse 246,950 186,448 75.50 60502 157,773 2%675 1e.17
PdrdT4at5de 69,60D 35.923 51.61 33,6r7 47274 (11,351) (24.01) y
Ntdx &Ads 13,60D 17,134 125.99 (3534) 19.726 (2Fu92) (13.14)
Photo Pmcmirg 12.850 6.250 48.60 6.600 4488 (2218) (2819)
Training at Meeergs y
NeeBngs 235,800 142,091 6D.31 93,509 167208 (25,117) (15172)
Trtidrg 839,500 245254 2921 S94XS 450346 (205A91) (45,54)
Operating Epe t%,s 1
Lr
(71er4ca Coagulants 1280130 925221 6865 482.90E 896287 2&840 323
Sulfide Corrod 1,310.430 915,789 69.88 W4,641 1,026,146 (110357) (1075)
Odor Carted 1,744,700 1,057,824 60.63 686,876 1,030462 27,382 2.68
Chericals-Cogenere6Cn Olen. - 7,097 WA (7,O1R) 3,474 Slim 104.M �
Miscellaneous Cherries - 4,277 WA (4,ZM - 49n -
Gasolm.Dies)&Cil 203,750 185572 91.08 18,178 124,038 61-IM 49M I
Toots 132-40 85X3 49.75 665U 77,180 (11257) (14591 y
SoN.Pangs,&Jan.Supplies 90,4M 46.452 51.35 ",Ole 48,xe (2153) (4,43)
Lab ChencalS&Supplies 32"Cle 234.961 71A6 93,849 291,519 (56,S" (19.40) -
-
OswOlx+raangSupplies M600 125,027 72.44 47.SM 136,722 (11,695)
(Continued)
Y
L
Section 2-Page 6 -
It
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
r Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Expense %E Expe. Irerease Increase
r Budget Thm Thn Remaining Thru (Decrease) (Oeaease)
Desaiotio, 1998.99 341,99 3131/99 Budget 3ra1/98 6
CmEouec
Cattraettel Services
Solids Rerwdl 4,128,390 3,031,93E 73.44 1,096.468 Z979-W 52.3" 1.76
Otter Waste Disposal 489,340 335,629 6859 163711 262,146 73,483 28,03
`+ Gar xWmping 3 Janitonal 2OZ380 147,789 7303 54.W 97,304 50,485 51.88
OAside L85 Servias 109,700 51,746 47.17 67,964 52.500 (754) (1.")
Otygen Plate Oper 286.000 20U96 72.05 79,805 197,500 8555 4.33
r OBer 1,828,740 617AM 2a30 1,310.777 457,608 69.855 13.08
Proleaiotal Sevier
Legal 40DAM 234.170 58.47 is= 305.738 (71,568) (23.41)
AudI13Aoourding 42AM 46.705 109.78 (4.165) 55.098 (8=) (15.12)
Engnseing 368,001) 111.700 31.64 241,30D 225283 (113583) (50.42)
Other 11100,90D W167 49.8E 551,733 3118688 165,499 4314
Reseaoh 6 Monitoring
ErrvticnmerU Movtonng 1,64E.000 978.537 5926 M463 1,497,646 (509,109) (3422)
Air3ja14 14onllonng 25,000 16,477 6691 6623 4,10 115w 237.09
Peseerdi 627500 30606E 48.77 3M.438 366417 (60,355) (16.47)
r ReparsBMaiNetence
Malenals B Sevio°s 2,72$600 2,500,638 91.65 227,662 2.209= 291,362 1319
Sic Mic Agnsements 1.170,510 578,583 49.43 591,957 565,415 (6,62) (1.17)
r UGIiBes
Teleplwne 2OZ600 151 ra 5362 131.074 135,041 16A86 1221
Diesel For Generators 34,000 - - 30M - -
NatumlGas 1,176,000 738.320 W-78 437.680 a55440 (117,120) (131191
Poxer 1=160 1,014,01E 79.65 259,108 736956 283.086 38-73
Water 976700 60B,42 62.30 3M218 549,342 59,140 10.77
Over Operating Supplies
.� Otoitle Eclup Rental 109.080 96.783 0781 13,297 111,95E (16.16g) (14.44)
District Epttip Rectal M400 222D71 SM61 SZ389 211,090 10,921 5.17
Irsuraree 1,4MOOD 791,92D 542D 668.680 914,179 (122,959) (13.45)
Freight 665W 41,701 7374 14.818 48,639 (6,318) (1426)
r Atsc Operating Exterse 220,740 113.710 51S1 107,030 14Q618 (26.926) (1a15)
ACAm Qeraing Fees 142000 as= 60.63 M907 1OD,716 (14,623) (1452)
Ganes]Manage Coraingency 2E9.400 - - 259,400 - '
Other NorWper Experse 57.190 iSa98 3304 38292 13.403 5.495 41.OD
Mares,Supp,8 Stan. 28.950,780 18216.041 6292 10.734,719 18,339.437 (123,396) (0.67)
Cost Allor.Cor1801Mr (2.912900) (1.9%536) WAIS (977,364) (1,426,5661 (509970) 35.68
Net J.O.4&M%Strop,a Sen. 26,037,860 16200505 62M 9,757,355 16912S71 (632,386) (3,74)
Told a O liwrenene 49,956,100 34545.103 69.15 15,410,997 35.274,733 (729.630) (207)
Little: fievenue f4.756.1001 f2.8/3.7341 59.79 (1.972.366) (3.952169) 1.106.435 (28.05)
HasaQEtgaldr5rR5 45200.000 31.701.360 70.14 _24�g1 31.322564 378.W5 L21
Section 2-Page 7
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Increase Increase L
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease)
3/31/99 3/31/98 $ % L
Preliminary Treatment 2,836,056 3,353,424 (517,369) (15.43)
Primary Treatment 3,203.447 3,227,683 (24,236) (0.75) L
Secondary Treatment 2,668,238 2,236.609 431,629 19.30
L
Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 232,742 173.454 59,288 34A8
Effluent Disposal 381,868 521,394 (139,526) (26.76)
M
Solids Handling 9.410.078 9,272,418 137,660 1-48 I
Cogeneration 2,578.109 2,994,888 (416,779) (13 L-92)
Utilities 710,711 698,018 12,693 1.82
Electrical Distribution 406,407 782,856 (376,449) (48.09)
Miscellaneous Buildings 4,134,024 5,187,093 (1,053,069) (20.30) L
Air Quality 633.115 904,631 (271,516) (30.01)
Laboratory 2,489,429 3,043,064 (553.636) (18.19)
r
Source Control 4.860AB0 2-879201 19BI679 88.83 1,
V
Total Joint Operating Requirements 34.545.103 35,274,733 (729,630) (2.07)
Less: Revenues (2,843,7341 (3.952.16.91 1 10B 435 28.05 L
Net Joint Operating Expenditures 31,701,369 31.322.584 378.805 1.21
♦r
L
I
it
V
u
Section 2—Page 8 --
L
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
March 31, 1999
Tao
666 673
r
60
70
575- 560 560 rye
26 28
� 31
so
b0b95 6/3N96 6/30/97 6I30196 131/99
■Actual ❑vacant
At March 31, 1999, the total head count was 522 employees, or a full time equivalency of
511.75.
Section 2 - Page 9
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
L'
u
U
L'
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
�J
V
L
I�
U
L
Section 2—Page 10
L
- CIP Review
_ Capital Improvement Program - FV 1998-99
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Plant 1
$4.303,043
Collection Projects 14°;
S9,907,636
33°°
Plant 2
53,714,592
13%
_ Equipment Items
S1,412,597 Interplant a Joint
5% Facilities
54.901,780
Special Projects 17°^
55,224,132
I It.
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure $29.463,780
Revenue
Area 13 Revenue
S222,940 Area 2
1' S6,6Tr,266
2]9'e
Revenue
Arm 3
59.460,3se
32.
Revenue
Area 5
52.714,060
� 9°3
Revenue Revenue
Area 1 Area 6
S2,140,643 S1.475,745
7% Revenue Revenue 5%
Area 11 Revenue
Area 14 Area 7
51.596.850 S1.243,536 S3,933,340
6'
4% 13%
Total Capital Improvement Funding - $29,463.780
Section 3- Page 1
1998-99 Third Quarter Report LW
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99
Estimated Actual Remaining Projected L
Outlay @3131/99 Outlay Outlay
Collection System Improvement Protects
Revenue Area 1 j
a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 67,O00 5.113 61.887 5,120 6i
b Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 20,000 20,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 97,000 5,113 81,887 25,120
Revenue Area 2 L
a Mods.To Newhope-Placenta Sewer 46,200 - 46.200 46200
b Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer and Pump St. 100,000 44,652 55.348 69,650
c Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief - 55 (55) 60 U
82.9 d Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 745.500 44 682,556 1,012.400
e 1-5 Freeway Widening Pmject,2-35 56,10D 1.136 54,964 1.890
f Pump Station Impmvements(10%) 12Z8W 13,788 109,062 1382D V
g Santa Ana River Intr.Shut Off Gate Rep1. 460,000 576,356 (116.356) 750:770
h Santa Ana River Intr. Realignment&Prot. 50D,000 234253 285.747 253.440
1 Frame,Cover and Coaling Rehab. 20,000 - 2D.000 20,OOD j
in Miscellaneous Projects 80.000 80,000 80,0110 W
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal Z130,850 963,184 1,177.460 Z248,230
Revenue Area 3 I I
a Pump Station Improvements,(14%) 171,990 19,303 15Z687 19,340 L
b Modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer 170,500 114.444 58,056 129,450
c Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3.11 R 3672W 8.691 359,509 69,570 j
d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 2.080,000 - Z080,000 28.500 L
e 1-5 Freeway Widening,3-37 462M 61,811 (15,611) 83.150
f Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hillsboro 2.589,500 to8,e79 Z482,821 205.64O
g Miller-Holder Improv., Imperial Hwy.,333-3 1,452,000 3.173.104 (1,721,104) 3,348.850 L
h Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 2D.000 20.000
1 Miscellaneous Projects 801000 80,000 80,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3 6,977,390 3.484.032 3,493,358 3,964,500
L
Revenue A 5 rea
a Pump Station Improvements,(28%) 343.980 38,606 305,374 38,680
b Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station 73.000 62,665 10,335 72,570
c Newport Blvd.B PCH Wdening 1,098.100 (137.909) 1.236,009 550,930 L
d Relocation of Lido Pump Station 2,350,9W 1,962.585 388,315 2,321,840
e Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilatation 62,700 - 62.700 62.700
f Frame, Cover and Coating Rehab. 30,000 - 30,000 30,000 '
V
g Miscellaneous Projects 120,000 120.000 120,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Areas 4,078,690 1.925.947 ZISZ733 , 3,198.820 j
Revenue Area 6 bw
a Pump Station Improvements,(6%) 73,710 arm 65.437 8290
b Newport Blvd.&PCH Widening 795,150 (99,895) 895,015 398.940
c Fairview Relief Sewer 2,207,01XI 538,477 1,370,523 Z037,890 '
d Watson Avenue/California St Sewer - 5,327 (5,327) 25,120 4
g Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 5.000 - 5,000 6.000
h Miscellaneous Projects 20,000 20,000 2DWO j
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3,100,880 75D212 Z350.648 Z495240 L
L
Section 3-Page 2
I '
u
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
1998-99 1998-99 19" 1998-99
Estineted Actual Rermining Projected
Outlay @3131t99 Outlay Outlay
Revenue Area 7
a Pimp Station Inprovemenls, (33%) 405.405 45.499 359.906 45,590
b Improvements to Main St P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 358.610 225,021 133,589 364210
e Orange Park Acres Tnmk Replacenart 1,327.000 1,510,528 (183,528) 1,579,870
f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 134,000 1,062 132,938 45,470
r 9 College Ave.Purrp Station Parallel Force - 4,846 (4,846) 9.850
h Armstrong Subtrunk Sever 500,000 155,453 344,547 169,020
i "8"Steel B Michell St Sewer Replacement 330,000 24,121 305,879 27,340
j Gisler Red KII Trunk Relocation 385,500 5,337 380,163 6,120
k Miscellaneous Repair of Local Sewers 574,000 - 574,000 574,000
1 Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
in Miscellaneous Projects 40,OD0 40,000 40,000
.. SUDTotal-Revenue Area 4,064.515 1.971,867 Z09ZS48 Z891p70
Revenue Area 11
r a Pump Station Improvements,(9%) 110,565 12,409 98,166 12,400
b Goldermest St.Sewer Replacement 418,OW 17,384 400,616 22,380
c Goldenivest St.Trunk Sevwtr Replacement 304,OOD 85,966 218,034 228,900
d Warner Avenue Punp Staten 65,OO1) 1,079 63,921 6,080
`v a Heil Interceptor 195,70D 83,977 111,723 228.130
f Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 195,001) - 195,000 190.000
g Huntington Beach Seger B Abandonnenl 50.000 37,839 12,161 42,860
r h Frans.Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
i Miscellaneous Projects 40.000 44000 40.000
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 11 1,388265 238.654 1.149.611 780.750
Revenue Area 13
b Capacity in Carbon Carryon Interceptor 23,000 - 23,000 23,000
e Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 700 - 700 700
f Capacity in Senate Ana River Interceptor 93,400 - 93,400 93.400
g Capacity in South liver Interceptor 14,500 - 14,5110 14,SW
h Capacity in New Taft Interceptor 11,900 11,900 11,900
r Sub.Total-Revenue Area 13 143,500 143,500 143,5W
r Revenue Area 14
a Inprovenents to Main St.P.S.,7-7-1 (72%) 922.120 578.627 343.493 987,980
b Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 10,000 10,000
Sut.Totsl-Revenue Area 14 932,120 578,627 353,493 997.900
Tool Collection System
Irprovement Projects 22,902,980 9,907,6W 12,995,344 16,743.610
Section 3- Page 3
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year I
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 L
1998-99 1998.99 1998-99 1998-99 1
Estimated Actual Remaining PmjecMd
Outlay @3131/99 Outlay Outlay
Treatnent 8 Disposal Proieels
Reclamation Plant No.1 I
1. Preliminary Treatment L
a Headworks No.2 Comml System Upgrade,J-31-3 1,115,000 599,189 515.811 W9,190
c Sunflower P.S.Drive Replacement,PI-62 325.001) - 328.000 25.000
2. Primary Treatrnem I '
a Pnnery Effluent Pumping Automation 95.000 - 95,000 - V
b Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,PI-37 1,000,000 3BZ749 637,251 882,750
c Prim Clarifiers 3,485 Rehab. Pl-41 100,000 237.130 (137.130) 257.130
d Adv.Primary Polymer Batdring PLC Pmgn 109,500 - 109,500 - L
3. Secondary Treatment
b Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,PIJ5-2 200,00D 988.838 (768,838) 1,128,840
c Drain Modifications at Activated Sludge Pond,P1a9 110.000 911 109.089 10,910
4. Solids Handling 8 Dewatenng L
b Automaton of Solids Storage Fac, P1b0 160,000 67,348 OZ1152 67.350
5. utility Systems
a Fire Protection, Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P7.T8.5 10,001) 723,584 (713,5" 1,073,5W I
b Elec6.Facility Modifies B Safety Upgrades,P1-40-1 700,000 24.248 675,754 34,250 y
Transfer to Project Below (12,500) - (12,500) -
Alarm Beacons for Venting of Gas Holder 12,50D 785 11,715 7,790
c Fac Moddns 8 Safety Upgrades,PI 40-2 10,000 17,888 (7,688) 17,690
of Drainage Irtprov.At Plant 1,P1J63 218,001) 209,491 8,509 209,600 L
f Cherricel Facility Moddns,P146-2 1,2WODD 81.324 1,118,676 10I,330
g CNG Refueling Station,P1-51 433.816 461.082 (17,246) 531.050
6. Safety Improvements
a Seimic Retrofit of NarStucture Systerm,Pt-43 218,00D 93,6W 124,392 93,610
b Seismic Retrofit Strucaal Items,Pl44 3D4,00D 10,507 293,493 10,510
c Seisrrnc Retrofit of Four Structures, P1444 1,125,001) 40,830 1,084,170 140AM 1
7. Miscellaneous B Support Projects L
a Landscaping Project for Undeveloped Area 33,001) 14,%4 18,406 14,600
to Replace Air Conditioning Units @ Warehouse 35,000 - 35,000
c Repl Six Gas Fred Ceiling Heaters @ Fleet 20,001) - 20,000 -
d Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters @ B 29,000 - 29.000 - y
e Waste Side Stream Automation 50,000 1,020 48.980 1,020
f Allowance for Planned Small Projects 1,91100,001) 398,159 1,501.841 587,180
Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 1 9,491.316 4,303,043 5,188,273 5.784,080 I
Treatment Plant No.2 L.I
1. Prelimnary Treatment
a Headworks Improvements @ Plant 2,P2-66 1.000.000 24,486 975,514 29.490
b Improvements to Influent Sampling System P2-75 35,001) - 35,000 - L
2. Primary Treatment
to Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2.48 MAW 372,940 293,080 39ZS40
3. Secondary Treatrem
a DAF.TNckenw Surface Skim Sup.Rails 65A00 - 65,00D LI
to Rehab of Secondary Facilities,P2-74 485,000 - 485,000
4. Solids Handling 8 Devatering _
a Conveyor Belt Repl.-Solids Storage Loading 75,000 - 75.000 -
b Dewatering Beh Press Rebuild 220,000 23,292 198,708 23.300 L
c Digestion 8 Dewatering RehaloRefurbishment - - -of Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 817,000 215,971 6M,029 415.970
e TNAS Feed to Digesters F 8 G,P2-391 110A00 83,294 25,706 90,670 1
f Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P2.60 1,000A00 496,959 MD41 566,980 bd
L
Section 3-Page 4
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
1998-99 1998.99 1998-99 19"
Estimated Achal Remaining Projected
Outlay @3131199 Outlay Outlay
5. llGlity,Systems
a Digester Gas Flare Control System Upgrade.P2-76 154,000 - 154,000 -
r c Modify Fire Protection,Signs&Water Sys,P2-46 10,000 641,096 (631.096) 991,100
d Fire&Water Sys Moddn5,P246-2 7,000 11,043 (4,043) 11,050
e ded Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-1 1,500,000 79,680 1,420,320 379,680
f Chemical and Plant Water Moddns,P2-55 10,000 354,265 (344.265) 704,270
g Air Compressors for Plant Air System,P261 240,000 50,731 189,269 90,730
h Gas Compressor-Redundancy,P2.79 526,000 - 525,000 -
6. Safely Improvements
a Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 31,000 30,280 720 39280
b Satiric Retrofit of Systems.P2-50 131,000 233,588 (102,588) 233,690
c Satanic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53-2 469,000 16,038 4SZ962 16,040
d Rehab Tunnel Lighting System,P2-78 279.000 - 779,000
7. Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a Maintenance Building,P2-35-3&-1 70,000 404,148 (334,148) 454,160
b Warehouse BciMng,P265 1,130,000 211,877 918,123 711,880
c I=Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 10,000 99,346 (89,346) 99,350
d Replace Air Conditioning @ Liquid Oxygerr Ro 21,000 21,000 -
e Replace Air Conditioning @ OPer Center 22,000 1,151 20,849 1,160
f Replace Ed raust Fans @ Operators Center 12,100 - 12,100 -
r g Replace Existion Supply&Return Dudmodc 30,000 - 30.000 -
h Plant 2 Facilities Engineering 1,900,000 364,407 1,535,593 369,410
Sub•Total -Treatimem Plerd2 11,025,100 3,714,592 7,310,508 5,621,020
Interplant and Joint Faciffties
1. Plant Automation&Computerization
a Computerized I=Records and Dig.Sys.J-25-1 385,000 136,855 248,145 186,680
b Sec.Treatrrem Montt&Ctrl System Upgrade,J314 300,000 61,124 238,876 81,120
r c Power Monitoring and Control Systerrs,J-33-3 198,000 - 198,000 -
d Plant ReirsreNiordAutomation Project,J42 2,706,000 1.078,618 1,627,382 1,128,620
e Corrv.Of Modbus+Data FMrys to Pong Config 210,000 46,251 163,749 48260
f Fiber Optic Upgrades 456,500 181,996 274,504 182,000
g SCADA Administration Soli Improvement 150,000 - 150,000 -
h Stdz Plant 1&2 Field Fiber Optic Tenn.Jct Fa 229,700 73,170 156,530 73,170
2 Safety&Security Improvements
r. a Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1 &2,J-35-1 965,000 290,378 664.622 640,380
b Confined Space Personnel Retrieval Syst sn,J-49 113,000 23,994 89,006 24,000
c Fire Alarm&Security System Upgrade,J-57 298,250 407,933 (109,683) 467,930
3. Support Facilities
a Enclose Open Bay ataarehouse Storage,J-20.1 157,000 - 157,000 10,000
b Collection Facilities Depot,J60-1 136,910 8,046 128,864 8,050
Transfer to Project Belau (2,023) - (2,023) -
r Chlorine Bldg Mach Equip Demolition.J60 2,023 21,019 (18,996) 41,020
c InfomEdim Tedvrologies TrailwAdddion,J61 243,000 27,268 215,732 27,270
4. Utility Systems Improvements
a Electrical Power System Sudies,J-254 439,000 522,339 (83,339) 722,340
.r b Electrical Power System Studies,J-25-5 87,500 - 97,500 8,000
c Standby Power Reliability Mcddns,J-33-1 947,000 559,867 387,133 1,009,870
d Cable Tray Improvements,J47 2,500.000 265,706 2,244294 355,710
e Ir pvr.To Central Generation Starting Air System,J63 36.000 2,363 33,637 12,360
r" f Mdgation of Cent Gen.Waste Heat Boiler,J64 50,000 5,879 44,121 5,880
g Gas Modng Systems Irrprovemems,J68 208,000 22,527 185,473 32,530
Section 3-Page 6
1998-99 Third Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,1999
1998.99 1998-99 1998-99 199&99
Ewt, Actual Remaining projected 6J
Outlay @3131A99 Outlay Outlay
5. Flow Managemern&Reliability
a Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 32,000 305,954 (273,964) 344,120
o Outfall Flow Meter Replacement J56 90,000 3.113 86,887 63,110
d Peak Flow Management Projects,J-67 100,000 288 99,712 290
6. Mscellaneous Projects
a Rewww or Standard Speoficalions,J-44 150,000 106,464 43,536 156,470 1
b Evaluation or Tunnels for Structural Integrity,J-55 203,000 30,200 172,800 35,200
c New Git Augers,J52 558.000 38,739 519,261 136,740
d Morons to Evisbng Madwical System J52 143,000 - 143,000 30,000
e Tunnel Flooding Monitoring System,J55 30,000 - 30,000 - u
f Mechanical Seals on High Rate Digester Ma 517,000 92,788 424,212 92,790
h Joint Facilities Engineering 1,400,000 598,891 801,109 699,410
Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 14,038,860 4,901,780 9,137,080 6,623,500
Sub-ToW - Major Projects 34,555,276 12.919.415 21.635,861 18,028,600 61
Special Proles
1. Strategic&Master Planning
a Imestigetion and Rehab of Ocean Outrall,J-39 390,000 111,140 278,860 221,140 V
b Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,J-40-1 379,850 (94,460) 474,310 (94,460)
c Detenn.Of Fin Charges and Fee Schad.,J-40.2 94,145 7,572 86,573 158,460
d Treabrent Reuse and Disposal Plan,JAG-3 652,000 500,598 151,402 625,600
e CEQA,Public Participation,J40-4 514.000 90,298 423,702 370,300
If Permit Renewal&Maintenance, 50,000 51,728 (1,725) 51,730
g Plant O&M Manuel&S.O.P.Inprov.Project 230.000 - 230,000 10,000
2 Infomefion Managerut&Computerization L1
a Air Quality lnfometion Mgnt Sys. 180,000 75,038 104,962 180,030
b Automation Report Publishing 120.000 58,579 61,421 95.000
c CMMS Programrteng 230,000 155,375 74,625 170,000
d Data Integration 1,489,000 1.012,051 476,949 1,489,000
e Document Management 571.000 171,346 399,654 325,000
f Financiall.k.L.. on System(IT) 450,000 252,657 187,343 450.000
g Geographic Info n on System 180.000 3,745 176,255 180,000 �J
h Internet Application Development 188,240 27,841 160,399 188.240
i Intranet Application Deveopmem 91,600 29,070 62,530 91.600
j L.I.M.S.InplerterWtion Phase ll 75.000 5,900 69,100 75000
k NeMork Baddwne Upgrade Continuation 579.040 156,066 422,974 579:040
I Nelwotd Test facility 105,000 49,205 55,795 105,000
m Source Control Progra...ng 255.000 123,524 131,476 255,000
n Strategic lnfomnation Architecture(SIA) 240.000 21,355 218,645 240000
o VoicelData Building Rewiring 221,060 108,725 112,355 221:080
p Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 111.980 - 111,980 111.980
q Year 2000 Data Change 186.000 1.297.122 (1,111,122) 1,800,000
3. Research&Development
a Activated Carbon Full Scale Evaluation 60,000 - BQ000 60,000
b Bictridding FlSer Development&Demonstration 123,500 355 123,146 123,6W -
c Large Scale Miaofi8ra8on DemansMon 55,600 42,806 12,694 55.500
d Msc Optimization Studer&Innpovements 210,000 - 210,000 20,000
e Prinery Effluent Filtration Large-scale Test 207,000 61,307 145,693 207,000
f Processes to Achieve Class A Biosolids 117,000 4.321 112,679 20,000
I !
La
V
Section 3-Page 6
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99
Eserr®led Actual Remaining Projected
Outlay @ 301199 Outlay Outlay
4. Utility,Systems
a Cen Gen Engine Air Emission Monit drtg Sys 550,000 34,571 515,129 550,000
b Can Gen Engine NOX 8 VOC Emission Evel 195,000 - 195,000 195,000
c Korrax Direct Steam Injection System 46,000 - 46,000 46.000
d Plant 1 8 2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 240,000 - 240,000 200,000
a Plant Water Station Valve Upgrade 27,000 - 27.000 25,000
f Upgrade Phone System 40.000 3,202 36,798 40,000
S. Process-Related Special Projects
a F1202 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 35,000 - 35.000 35,000
b Prelim Corrosion Assmt Study for Collection 72.WD - 72,000 72,000
c Ileadwoks Main Sevar Pump Rehab 150,000 70,929 79,071 100.000
d Headvadrs Scrubber Seal Rebaf r 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
e Digesters Elpansion Joint Replacement 75,000 - - 75,000 75,000
f KADY Process for Digester Performance mov. 85,300 1,988 83,812 85,800
g Repl Pn Clarifiers Foul Air WD Trans.Coupli 32A00 - 32,000 32,000
r, h Clarifier Efficiency Improvements 100,000 - 100,000 -
i Belt Press Automation 175,000 - 175.000 40,000
j Belt Press Drive Unit Replacement 50.000 - 50,000 -
k P-2 Sludge Grinder Replacement/Rehab 224,000 - 224,000 180,000
` I P-2 Sludge Una Expansion Joint Repl/Rehab 60,000 55,281 4,719 60,000
m So fibber Chemical Feed System Mod. 415,000 51.433 383.587 415,000
n Sulfur Monitoring for Combustion 101,000 SZ801 8,199 101,00D
�. o Upgrade Emission Modeling Testing System 22,000 1,300 20,620 22,000
6. Niscellaneous
a Replacement of Plant Process Equipment $0,000 - 80.000 80,000
b Miscellaneous Reliability 8 Redund.Projects 50,000 - 51 50,000
Transfer to Project Below (35) - (35) -
Pit 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 35 557 (522) -
c Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 80,00) 45,876 34,124 80.000
f Securely System Improvements 267,OW 127,622 130,178 257,8W
Sub-Total-Special Projects 11,528,535 4,819,202 6.709,333 11.136,310
Water Management Projects
` a Grouotvater Replenishment System, J-36 775,000 198,998 576,002 775,OOD
b Water Conservation Cooperative Projects 200,000 25ZI02 (52,102) 252,100
c ONInfilmborVlnflow Cooperative Projects 100,000 100,000 100,000
` Sub-Total-Water Management Protects 1,075,000 451,100 623,9D0 1,127,10D
Equipment Harris 2,124,000 1,412,597 711,403 2,000,000
Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 49,282,811 19,802,314 29,650.497 32,292,010
` Construction in Progress Completed at 6/30198 (46.170) 46,170
Total Collections,Treatment
and Disposal Projects 72,185,791 29,463,78D 42,722,011 49,035,620
r
r
Section 3-Page 7
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 I..r
current Toal
Approved 613d98 YOU, Prajetleri Rarrelning L
Project Amoe4ated Projected Costal Rmao
Budget Coat Cast 6I3N99 Budget
Colleo6on SYstar,lrmo,ren vK Apiece
Roverne Aral
a SamaAra TwkSaver Rehab. 7,494,50) - 5120 5,120 7,484351)
b Frane.Coverard CoBrg Raab. 20,000 2D,000 20,0)0
Sub-Tabl-Ravenna Areal 7,514,500 - 25,120 25,120 7,40,3W
R verme Aral L
a Nock.To Nealope•Raornlia Sever %ono 4,373 46,200 Mon 15,BT7
b CarbonCanyon Dam Severand PrpPSt 2,194,000 SOS 69,WO 75,838 2,118,354
c SaRa Am f8rerbrteaeptor Relief 165/2,0017 - 60 60 16.571,91g
d Eulid Tnmk Manhole Rehab. 1,085,4100 41,713 1,012,400 1,054,113 11,487 L
e 15 Freeany Welening Project,2-35 140,800 102,093 1,89D IM,983 36,817
f Pimp SudwIrpr"mns(10i4) 420.300 71,121 13.820 04,941 301359
g Sana Ana fiver Intr.Shut Off Cate Repl. 767,000 96,400 760,770 847,179 (90:179) L
h Saira Ana Ruerinr.Ra RM Ogrurei68 . 11,884,00) 13,527 25&440 2196,957 11,51
I PhardormnddYabalMdaPwpSetion 280,00) - - - 28D,000
j Repamrareof Nev4mpa Rawntle Twk 8.022A0D - - 8,02400D
k RaRtaoemedof CypreSSAve.SldVuk 7.180,0W - - - 7,183,000
I Frmre,Cwere xl Coe&g Rehab. Amo - 20,000 20,000 -
m Blsoaareee Prgeds 83.000 80.000 BD,OOD
SrdsTcal-Roverae Areal 4&670,900 336,,222 Z,248.230 2,583,452 46,087,448
Revene Aea3 u
a Rep Satom lnprvvewrRrds,(14%) 6044W 99.5m 19.340 118,909 481,551
b BbNBraliars a Magnola Relief seas 21Z= 23,281 129,450 1S;731 si
c Seal Bach 6lvd Rehab.,3.11R 411 9,385 69,570 78,958 417,242 V
d Magrolla Tlurk Sever Rehab. SWAW 373,521 2S500 4OZO21 4,925,379
e 15 Freevay Vdderg,337 67,100 55,564 63,150 118,714 (51,614)
f Miler-HoltlerTRnk Sans,Adana to HIlaboro 6.312,00D 345,761 205.640 551,401 5,760,599
g MlkNlolder hopov.. Inperial Wvr.3383 6.34gOOD ZOIZ,763 3.34&850 6,161,603 18Z397 L
h Farr.Cove and coaling Reuse. 20,OOD - 20,000 20.000 -
I Mscelaneaa Projects 84000 80.000 84000
Sub-TeW-ReveraoArea3 19.459,460 3,719837 3.964.500 7,684,337 11,77&123
RlveeeaAra5 Yrl
a ROrp Station lnproverone.(29%) 12M.7W 19&137 38.680 237,817 984,943
b Beauhicaten of Boy Bridge Pump Station MOOD 1Z,389 7ZS70 W058 (6,055)
a Newport BNa&PCHWde..g 1,207,WD 230.851 650,930 781,781 428,019
d felocdonal lido Parp SaSon 4318.70D 491,087 Z,321,840 ZOIZO27 505,773 Y�
e BlgCeryon Tank Severleh*Jaa3on 2,245.100 - 62,700 SZ700 2,182.40D
f Ran Coverard Coating Rehab. 34000 - 30.000 3400)If Miscellaneous Projects 124000 - 120000 12g.000 - L
Sub-Total-Revenue Ara5 8,203,300 933,461 3.196,820 4,130261 4073,079
Raveua AraB
a Purr Station IaPmverrsa,(6%) 257,520 42,M 8.290 54983 206.557
b Ne4mrt BNd B PCH WdeBng 874,480 318,70 398,940 717,735 ISSAS L
c Fa row Relief Sewer 3,138,300 369,1M 2037,690 2.427,M5 711,225
el V✓teco Avenue/CalSana St Sever P,17&000 83.503 25,120 1osme 2,067,372
e dd"D'etiict 6TmNf Paalk4 1,719,001) - - 1,719,000
i Dover Dive ParalW Sever 1,893 - - 1.8611000 L
g Fmrte,Cover and Coaling Rehab. 5.00) 5,0X) &000 -
h Msa3leveas A*ds 20,000 - 20.000 20MO
Sub-Total-Revenue Arab 14=300 834,101 2,495,240 3,329,401 V61.1199
L
Section 3-Page 8
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
cu at Total
r Approved GOWN Year Prajecktl Rermining
pmect Anaar4atal Projedal Costat FNrae
Budget Curt Cost W30199 Budget
Revanre Ana 7
r a Rap Station Inpmstents,(33%) 1,416,360 M.Ml 45,590 Sam 1,347.610
to Irrpaerrems W Wain St.P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 1,088,68D 798,542 354,210 1,182752 (96.(172)
c Recount toll Parp Station Abandoment 216,000 - - - 215,000
d Caeylam Pwp Station Pbardonneit 210,000 - - - 210,Om
e Oarga Pak Pass Trunk Peplacarnnt 1AS52W 60,1D6 1,579,em 1,639.976 45,224
f Satllo4er Interceptor NaNmle Retain. 491,000 - 45,470 45,470 445,530
g College Am Rap Station Parallel Form 1,877,000 60,361 9,850 70,2D4 1.80%ms
r h Amctr ng SteNmit Sa 7,016,000 12,652 169,020 181,682 6.834,318
1 "0'Street&Nunel SL Seder Relaavrend 385,001) 1,811 27,340 M161 365.849
j CaIaRed HI Trunk Rabrallon 5.905,000 - 6,120 s120 5.899,BBD
k Mscelleeaa Aeparoflnml Sev.®s 2,EB1,0DO - 574,000 574,000 1,717,00D
r I Rare,Cm and Coatirp Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000. %ODD -
n lvtscelaneom Rcjegs 40,000 40,ODO 40.000
S1 Tobd-pWenm Arm7 VJM240 M735 2,a91,470 s84s205 18,791.035
Renene Areall
a Punp Station lrrprouareals,(9%) 386.280 6,343 1Z400 18,743 397,537
b Goicaewal St.Sev RepeCOmed 491,700 181,278 2Z380 203,658 288.042
c Geldeneed St.Trunk Saw Replamrtent 3,920400 Z384 228,900 231,284 3,689,116
`4 d Warner Aoenm Purtp Station 1,391,000 104,662 6,080 110,742 1,281258
e Heil lnerceixr 4.07ZOM Z336 228,130 23D,488 3,84Z434
f Wanner Av Relief Sener ZW3.6W - 190,000 194000 1,865,640
r g tWnlirglm Bondi Sear BPbadamerd 3MOOD 204 4288D 43,154 325.846
h Franc,Cora and Coating Raab. 1%OOD - 10,000 10,000 -
i Nisodaneae Projects 140,000 40.000 40.000 1MOOD
SWtToal-Revenue Ana 11 12,835,OM 297,297 780750 1.078,047 11,757,e73
r
R¢neln4e Arm 13
a Capacity in Fidid lydermptor 7,661,600 - - - 2,e61,600
b Capacity in Callen Canyon Interco" 5,845,148 - 23,000 23.000 s82Z146
c Capacity in Wdfidd TPA 36,96d - - - 35,968
d Capactrin NaloWTrunk Zg1152 - - - 23,852
a Capacity in Fast Ridrfied lrftreeptor 44942 - 70D 700 44,242
I
Capacity in Senate Aga Rives lrAaceptor 5,884,393 - 93.400 n,100 5,790,993
r g Capacity In South Aver ITAWOWa 935.918 - 14,SOD 14,SM 921,418
In Cape*in Nealreft Intelmplor 296,679 - 11,900 11,90D 254,779
1 Capacity in Orange Pak Acre,Sever 4,225,924 4,225.%4
r SubTotal-Revenue Area 13 19.955,424 143,500 143,5DD 19,811,924
Revenue Arml4
a Inpmamenstohkun SLP.S..7-7-1 (729A) 2,790,320 2,053.393 997,980 3,041= (247,053)
r b Franc,CweraM Coding Rdlab. 10,Om 10,000 10=
SubTaW-Rinanm Arm 14 2,804,320 Z00,393 997.980 3.051.373 (247,00)
Taal Collection Systarn
r Brprovernent Projects 152,166,424 9,130.105 1s743.610 25.87$716 126=708
r
r
Section 3-Page 9
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life U
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Cu nerd rd Tool
ARawed & W98 Veer Aaje ed limning J
Pr.l n AcwMeDed Prole Collet Fabae
ad-Pet Cat Cost a,.," M-W
Trwbrerd&Dmoosal Prdec6
Fbec�.Pb Nn1 L.I
1. PMirriney Treatnet
a Fbedaals No.2C bdSystenllpgr J-31-3 1,598,Om 1.178,570 809,190 1,787,76D (241,760)
b Headw4d6RehabFzbtskmm 300QOOD _ _ _ 3,007,ODD
c Sunfi z P.SDw Papa ureMPIQ 325,00D - 2i3ODO mlxc 3Dt,mD
z Fimary Tmamed
a Pnnayl3Bued RnpingAftrzb n 95000 - - - 95'ODD
b RiuwyTrerem72MGDElpaem,P137 6Z127,OOD 307,339 B5Z750 1,170,089 6D,956,911 L
c Rimaad5es3,4&5Nesb. PI41 1,845,OOD 1,504,313 257,130 1,761.443 83,557
d Adr.Piny Puymer wing PLC PWn 109,500 - - - 109,SM
3 Se=*ryTmaenet
a Sec Tmd Ross Pahab'Pofirbishnml S.SOQOM - - - 515000DD 6.
b Semtlary TreaheMEgwmmtomWMPl3s2 40800001) 38,324256 1,128,840 39,45q098 1,346,902
c Chin Modfi etas dA&4abd Sufge RaK,Pl59 123,OM 4205 1Q910 15115 107,885
4. So6deHr➢itg&Oeaamirg
a Dgesbm&D.v wng RHeWPHuilislment 9.80D.OM - - 9,800,OD0
b Aft etimof,%kr Raage Fac P-60 sworn 4,316 67,350 71,65 825,334
5. wiity sra s j
a FiteRdedm,Sgreand Vl�rSys hbds..Pl-3&5 ZW100 Z513,707 1,07QSBD 3,58 Z7 (9c W 41 i1.
b aecl.FacndrMidfrs&Salty L1pgala,Pl-40-1 896000 201,583 34.= Zj sm 850167
Twoferto Praled Bawv (1z5q _ _ _ (lz5n
Alamlla fbrVmfigd(3sHdtlx 1z5OD - 7,790 7,79D 4,710
c Fac b2A')lfre&Safety lA><3dM P14&2 1.655,000 11550298 17,69D 1,557,985 97,012
d Damage Wow.At Ram 1,P1403 220,000 1Z783 209,5M 22Z253 9."
e Flat IPolifies RetebrdwWwad 500,0m _ _ _ =ODO
f awrifal Fadfdy NMfre,PI46.2 3,49g00D 516.443 101,330 617,773 Z918=
g CNG PaWng Statm,Pl51 1,40ZSM 1,04z931 531,060 1,573,991 (171,392) L
6. Safety lnpmarvtds
a Seuric Rebafitofllw buc Systrre,Pl-43 1,44QDM 1=039 93,610 1,301,649 144,351
b Seism Retrofit Stnadrallt mPl-44 z590,000 11QSQ 1Q510 121,052 Z46UM L
c SesncR McfFwSr KWm, Plm I'M% 0 Z3702M 140,830 Z511,106 (128z106)
7. Mscellaeas&Sgpw Rojeds
a Lardsaping RrjeYfmlAMeodopefPres 33.000 - 14.OM 14,60D 18,400
b Rep1a ArCondex&Qtkts@V%tMh s 35.DM _ _ _ 35.000 Li
c R4pl Sor Cgs Fred Cai'ug Hmtes@Fleet 2QOM _ _ _ 2000D
d RO"Tm Gas FmdCaflng Fkafes@B 29,DM _ _ _ 29.00D
e VSSRSdeSUemAL arEbw 5QOM - 1,020 1,020 48,980
f Alloaarre for PW,.w anel Flge 41,BOQ000 58825 597,160 W785 41,154215 u
Sb-Total -Rdamic.Plant 184,285,9a 5g90&22B 5,784,080 5Q69Z308 127,57Z901
Treabrard Ran Nat
1. Prelwiray`F ait u
a H9@dvmlo:lnprocmeds@PIardZP2E6 14,706,,000 15,191 29,49D 44,681 14.663,319
b hrprwerenlstolnff tSarplirg9/dmt P2-75 -mom - - - 70,000
z PnnMTr®bnmt
a Rnin Tra:treMR&ebrbfixbismwd 9,61&000 - - - 9,618,000 V
b Pnmq Dame Pahab. F248 5A37,000 4.976330 39ZS40 5,369= 2b7,Td0
3 Swwday Tmbrat 1
a DAF.TWd Sidaw Sl m Sp.Rats 65,000 _ _ _ 65.000 Ilrl,
b FWmbof Semndwy Fadfdw,P2-74 6,841,OM - - 6,841,000
L
Section 3-Page 10
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
current Total
r App.ed a3e98 Tea Projected Rerrelning
Project AcounuWled ".01sd Costat Future
6pOpBt Coat Cost 6Ide99 Budget
4. Solids liadling&Dcweluing
a Conveyor Bea Ruff,-Solids Storage Loading 75,O00 - - - 75,OD0
to Desetetrg Belt Press Reddld analo - 23,3W 23,300 801,700
c Digesem&13traredn9 RehaNReurt sloart 7.800,00) - - - 7,800.000
d Rehab of Digesters at Rart 2,P246 21.000.000 $88.616 415,970 1,302,485 19.697,515
r e 7WAS Feed to Digesters F&G P2-19.1 200000 $4,571 9016M 175,241 24,759
f Solids Storage Facility a Rem 2,P260 9.99&000 Seg01 568.960 663.861 9,329,139
5. lNOly Spa.
e Digester Gab Rare Cod Systun llpgred%P2C16176+C756 154,000 - - - 154,000
r to Red Willies 1,ODO,OOD - - - 1,000.000
c Modify Fire Ratedlon,Signs&Water Sy%P2,1D 3,763.000 3,410,294 991,100 4,401,394 (638.394)
d Fire&Water Sys Modifm,P2-4&2 200.00D 172,752 11,050 183.802 16,198
e Eleed Fee Morons&Solely Upgrades,P2474 4,400.000 502,446 379,680 882126 3.517.874
r f Chen4011 and PIW Veeter Motifs,P265 4=DDO 4,164,MS 704.270 4.860806 (668,806)
g Air Compressors for Rem Air Sy&en,P261 551 1,935 93,730 92,665 487,335
h Gas Cmpreasor Redundancy,P2-79 528.OD0 - - - 525,000
6. Se"
a Plants 11 Ste&SeauBy[nip.,P2.355 1.455.632 1,337.355 392W 1,376,685 78,967
b Selmic PebultoIhionSbuctue$oa ,P260 1.811,OD0 1207.851 233,59D 1,531,441 279,559
c SeieNC Retrofit Smctuel loans P2-532 4.424.000 4,17&OO7 16.040 4,19ZM7 231.953
d Rehab Tunnel Lig141rg Sysleol P2-78 279.000 - - 279.010
r 7. Msoellanmoa&S paort Projects
a Mairteance SUlcing,P2S53&-1 9.35&ODO S790884 454,150 7,245.014 2,112,98&
b Warehouse Bulkfing,P265 1=000 10&100 711,880 519.986 510,014
r c Far Modit&Sa(ely Uppades,P247-2 1, KOW 1,468,586 99,360 1,667,938 6ZO54
d Replace Air Cadalonirg@LkS id Oxygen Ro 21.000 - - - 21,000
a Replace Air Conditioning @ Oper Cater 22.OW - 1,160 1,160 20,840
f Replace Fddsnsl Fars @ Open6ore Center 1$tOD - - - 12.100
r g Replace Eaadoa Su#y&Robert Melowk 30000 - - - 30,000
h Rat 2 FadrNes Engineering 41,8000D0 1OZ735 389,410 SOZ146 41=,654
Su Total •Treaboart Rut2 153,807,732 29MMS 5,621,020 35.309,055 116A9&674
In"art and hint Facilities
r 1. mart ANonation&Conprtavetlan
a Camgdeved Far Records and Dap.Sys,J-251 4,605,000 725,741 186.860 91zem 3,6M.399
b Sec Trminent Mont&Cld System Upgrada,J314 1,916,1100 221,420 81.120 3OZ540 1.613,460
c Paner7dorttabrg and Control S/sixam..13&3 4,033ODO - - - 4.033,O00
d Rat RahvatiaYAN 1,128,82 omdon Project.J-42 25,760ODD 319,852 0 1,448,502 24,311,498
e Ce ..Of Wrote al)ata lays to Porg Cofi9 210.0DO - 462M 4290 163.740
I Fber Opdc(p9ales fi60.0DO - 182,OW 111 478.000
g SCADAAdrdrislo on SoMarehrymuerert 1500DO - - 150,000
`I h Shb Ram i&2 Fidd Fiber Opbc Term Jd Fa 324,700 - 73.170 73,170 251,530
2. Sa(ey&Senely lmpmvemenk
a Amer Classificdo SLuTm,Rats 1&2,J l 1,0170,ODO 53,810 640,380 694,19D 305,810
r b CO*Wd Spew Peremrel Retrieval System.i49 35ZODO - 24.000 74,001) 328,000
c Re Alain&Senvity System Upgrade„l57 560pm 155,861 467.930 624,791 (64.791)
3. Support Fadliaes
a Entree Open Bay a varthose Storage.1261 175,OOD 28,031 10,000 38.031 135,989
r b Callecdm Fadlibes Depot J W1 WORD - 8.050 8,050 637.950
Transfer to Project Boles, (136,910) - - - (138,910)
Chat re Bldg Mach E#p Demolition,J60 13&910 41.020 41,020 95,ea0
c lidan 0r Tedrdaglea Trelle AdCHW.J 1 243,000 - 27.270 27,2m 215,730
r of Sulding Renah9efobishmem 1,455,000 - - - 1,45SODD
r
Section 3-Page 11
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report U
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life I I
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 Yrl
Amen Total I
Apposed GW9B Year Prgacao Banning V
Project Armn4a0ad Projtctod Costat F1IDae
Budw Coat Cmt 6W99 BMW
4. Uildy SydWsNPwemis
a BaoriW Pawl System R,d ,J354 3,171,000 146,631 722.340 8%971 Z30Z029 L
b 9eM®I Paler Systen Shales,J25-5 3,388,000 - 8.000 8,0m 3=000
c SbMby Few RaiadBy Modlre,333-1 17208.000 735.979 1,m9m 1,745749 15,480.251
d Cable Tray lrmnovwnanla .L 7 1Z,7%ODD 9&174 355,710 454884 1Z290,116
a laW..ToCerbal CeeB80a Starting Air Sy5en J63 138,000 - 1Z360 1Z3W 1A640
f N1*& n of C.Gen Waste llat Bole,364 MAOOD - 5680 5.880 194,12)
9 Go Ming Systers Irmp J69 497.000 442 32,530 3Z972 464,025
h EWMal Facilities f@taNftmubs..a. &670.ODD - - 6.670,000 I 1
5. FIoeMmagawd&Rakbilly u
a Suje Taaer Rrylamrer2J34-1 82wlos 7,9S1,B17 344120 8.297,757 (38.631)
b Fosta0A-d PunmMStation%1vbJ-59 13040.0M - - 13.04D,000
c WIWI Rm Mae Replaoenmc J66 924,0M - 63,110 6&110 WAND I
d Peek Fbx Nanage Reeds,JW 3.640.000 - 29e 290 3.GX710 LI
6. mampareas Pajeus
a Rwiebn of Sfadad SpeaSrbws,J44 341,OOD 3&122 156,470 192.582 14&408
b Evaluation of Tunnels fa Sonxu Wegty,155 MOOD 10.700 35= 46900 190.100 L
c New CMAuWs,J52 590,000 - 138,740 138,740 421.280
d Modihs b Edsttrg Yw anial SWen J4P 1.473.00D - 30.000 30,000 1,443.000
a Tunnel Fie Monitoring Syslen J65 IMODD - - 180.000
f Madadal Sess on Filth Pate Diq b Mr 517.= - 9Z790 9Z79O 434210 Lt
g Odx Caod Pn ooss daNPefabislvmd 1,80 om - - - t,900.000
h Jain Fadrtes Ryneeing 30.800.000 245.904 699,410 94&314 29.85,105
SdFTotal -InnfoaMBJdM 148.057,805 10,733214 616Z3.500 17,3M.714 130.-MOM
Su1>Tdal - &tdor Prgeds 486.130.747 91,326,480 18=600 108,355,OB0 M.M.657 L
Speoal"ooft
1. S02bgic&MetaP M
a I.,w gationand!R a 010oan OL [,J39 1,439.600 759XI 221.140 980,341 459,28 L
b Manegenent of Peak Fydraulic Dstlage,J 1 Z646,350 Z554,178 (94.460) Z459,718 18&632
c Odens Of Fin Chw9et and He Sled,J 2 6KI45 67&8550 15&460 837,310 (1421,165)
d TreaOnel,Raseanrl OdPcsal Fan,J403 1,46Z000 1,251,474 626.600 1.977.074 (414074)
a CEO4"n Parbapalim J404 6OZOOD 16Z7O7 374300 SAW 148,99.3 J
f Fa mB Raeval&WAnbaance 54000 OW078 51.730 747,90E 1697,809)
g PmntO&MMamal&SO.P.blprw.Rojed 2340DU - 109DD 14000 22D,OOD
2 bdonrslbr Maregrnv/&Carpbrva8an
a ACCkaNy I ft aft M,Pt Sys. 250.000 44,934 1840DD 224,934 25.066 L
b Mloreflprl Report P olis ing 19&000 - 9&000 95.000 10D,OD0
c Childss Plopannug 49QOM 104.166 1740D0 274,166 215,034
d Otla fM8-oration 4,334,000 20292 1,4WODD 1,754,= ZSM73B
a Ooa4ral hu ager ent mo00 37.434 325.000 3BZ434 437,595 y
f Fretonlrrtan S)5en(r) Z475.00D 1,98&157 4WOM Z435,157 3&843
g Oeayaphiclnbm &ysMm 974,OOD - lamom 18MOOD 6KOOD
h IMertN Appfraion RwlopmE 3114M 39.351 1a&M 227,991 154.649
i 110. APPfl=on RwJopterl 235.60D X816 91,60D 1W,416 1010,184 61
j LI.MS IapksreNaoon Phase II 505,OOD 38495E 75AM 455,96E 49.042
k NWdk BedAae 1pgr4de Continuation 1.439.040 490,507 579.040 1.089,647 369,493
I Nahwlk Tali Faolly 125,000 - 105.000 105,003 21.OM
m souacoed Rognurmng 5MODO 147,746 25&OOD 4OZ745 173255 Lai
n SWagiclidonabm Ardmesae(SW 724,000 189.621 240.0M 429,821 294579
o ybia'Oab ft rbonimg SMOBD 29ZSM Mow 513.672 55.48
p VAaelraw Bar Cade Evaluation 111.980 - 111,980 111,9w - L
q Yem20001da Charge Z141.500 WAS 1,B00.000 1,mne 305,781
L
Sec9on 3—Page 12
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Q➢rold Total
Approved Satires year Projected RermiNrg
Project Aauntlalyd Projected Coated Futures
Budget Cost Cm1 rJ3099 Budget
3. Peseard,&Davelogren
a Ptlrrdted Carbon Full Scale Evaluation KOM 60,000 60.000
ri b 6otrid,14 Filter Devdcpmet&CenvSUation 12J,500 im= 123500 -
c Large Scale Mcrofileation Dennrstration 96,5m IS'm 55,500 1OZ225 (5,725)
d hbsc Optinizetiun Studies&InprwmerAs 430.000 M.222 20,000 64,222 355,778
e parlay Effluent Fibatian Large-Scale Ted 349,000 195,W1 207,000 4OZ301 (63.301)
r f ProosuestoAchism ClassABiasdids 127,Om 314 MDDD 20,314 106,M8
4. Lally System
a Cen Gen ErgineAlr Bdsslm Mentaing Sys 550,000 4ZS90 550,OOD 59Z590 (32,59D)
b Can Cm Engine MCK&VOC Enneson Eva] 195,000 - 195,001) 19500) -
c I(ermr Direct Steam lryetn Systen 46,000 - 46.000 46,000
d Plant l&2 Had Leap RC Studies 440,000 8.548 200.000 2I8,548 231,452
a Fled alder SbAon View upgrade 27.000 - 2UM 25,OOD ZODD
f Upgrade Phone System 78,000 230.021 40.000 270,021 (19ZO21)
r 5. ProcassAelared Special Projects
a H2O2 Dosing Feed Sesar for Influent Truft 40,000 - 35,000 35,000 5,000
TrdrsW bProtect Below (39,205) - - - (39X5)
r H202 Continuous dMrtlorNrehsabrmtAulamtuan St M= - - 39,215
b pre inn Corrosion Asnt Study fat Collection IN.= - 7ZODO 7Z000 35,000
c Haednorks Mean Sasser Purp Rehab ".000 - 1=000 100,000 2001000
d HeacyMn SrnEber Seal Reboh 10,000 - 1%= 10.000 -
„4 a Digesters Expansion Jdct Pepewtri 75,001) - 75,000 75.000 -
f KADY Pnowss for Digester Foadomenos brpv. 90,80D - SLOD0 Kam 5,000
a Rap!Pd Car'riiers Foci PirWDTrans.Couch 32,DOD - 3ZOW 3ZOD0 -
h CeMier FJfldencyortpwaren6 1.700,OW - - - 1,700.000
r 1 Bait Press/udmabn 175,1= - 40,001) 40,ODO 135,OOD
I Bad pis Don unt Replsrareri 50,000 - - - SO,OOD
k P-2 Sludge Grader Repaarrat/Rehab 224,DOD - 180,OOD 180.0D0 44,000
1 P-2 Sludge Use Expasin Jdni RepVPehab 60,n1D - 60,OOD 60.000 -
'�' m Scrubber chemical Feud Systan Nod 685,ODD K476 415,001) 473,476 211,524
n Su ur Von"for Cpo shoe 126,OOD 3R6W 101,000 131,OM (5,109)
o upgrade Enrussar Modeling Testing System 5Zc00 27.955 2ZOOD 49,965 2,045
6. Msadenneps
r� a Replaosnent of Pert Proms EquipreN 1,7603000 - a7,000 8IL000 1,680,001)
b Mwtlamc s RsliabO]ly&Radurd.Prge o; 25o,0o0 itteso 50,000 68560 181,040
Tramferlupmjectseelm (15Z8W) - - - (1SZOBB)
Energy DeregdaOon Study 57,26E Mg - 539 56,729
Pit 2 Anionic PdynerPe instin 95600 77,692 - 77AM 17,908
c S EM Capiel Equacnat Replaxamad Road Wcol - 80,000 MOOD -
f Seomty,System lnpmuemne 784,900 130.592 257,800 386,392 396.408
SubToW-Special Pro]atls 3Z58&135 11,085,284 11,136310 22.MI,594 10,354,541
Water Nerugmnrt Projects
a Groundsete,Reeteniennol Systm{ J36 121,925,000 541,012 776,000 1,316,012 1120,608,911111
b Water Consenrlin Coopensim Pryeds 1,000p00 - 25Z100 25ZIOD 747,900
c City lrtNatioMnflwv OooPeatMe Roods 205,100.001) 100.00D 100.000 205,000.00D
Sub-Trial-Ware,Neregerad Prvjeob, 328,025000 541,012 1,127,101) 1,688,112 326,359.885
Egwpmetaens 44,124,000 Z111,161 2A00.00D 4,111.161 40.01ZM9
r Total Treabrient&Disposal Projects 890.S4SM IM04AS37 32AZO10 137,336,947 753,5M.935
construction in Progress Cpr4kted st 61311/98 - 59,644,199 - 69,644,199 (69,644,19%
projects To Be ldenified in Strategic Plan 5250o0.000 52%OOD,WO
Total Culledione.Tee amen
and Disposal Projects 1,569,012306 173,818,242 49,035,620 22Z853,862 1.346.158.444
r
Section 3-Page 13
1998-99 Third Quarter Report L
L
L
L
L
L
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
L
L
L
L
i
Ir
L
L
L
Section 3—Page 14
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
r All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review
W
1998-99 Year-To, Remaining Year-To-Data
Budget Date Budget %Expanded
.r REVENUES:
Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 10.000 5,399 4,601 53.99%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) 30,815,000 20,605,656 10,208,344 66.87%
r• Connection Fees 6,800,000 5.766,470 1,033,530 84.80%
Other Fees 73,795,000 42,468,293 31,326,707 57.55%
Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50,000 -
`. Interest&Misc.Receipts 20,648,000 17,105,558 3,542,442 82.84%
Other - 469,070 (469,070) -
Total Revenues 132,118,000 86,421,446 45,696,554 65.41%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 49284,000 19.556,144 29,727.856 39.68%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 22,904,0W 9,9D7,636 12,996,364 43-M
COP(Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 30,444,ODD 24,957,997 5.486,003 81.98%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45"D,0DD 31,701,359 13,498,631 70.14%
District Operating&Other Fxpendtures 94-79SW 4,919,Z70 4,360= 53.01%
Total Outlays 157.111SW 91,042,416 66,069,084 57,95%
r
Capital Facilities Budqet Review
r Balance Adjustments 7ransferto Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
�+ Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 34,705.356 9,907,635 (25,575,250) 19,037,742
Share of Joint Works 150.440.836 19.556.144 - 169.996.980
Sub-Total 185,146,192 29,463,780 (25,575250) 189,034,722
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 2,975,286 - - Z675288
r' Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 307,096,988 (25,575,250) - 281,521,738
Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,972
Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,Wz
'r General Plant and Admin. Facil. 885,732 - - 885,732
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 674,856,556 (304.452) - 674,552,104
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 79,646 (36,954) - 42,692
r
Sub-Total 985,715,638 (25,916,858) - 959,798,982
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,170,861.11M 3,547,124 (25,575,250) 1,148,833.704
r
Section 4-Page 1
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1998.99 Year-To. Remaining Year-to-Date W
Budget Date Budget %Expanded
REVENUES: L
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only)
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 1,976.000 1,411,662 564,338 71.44%
Connection Fees 500.000 210,884 289,116 42.18%
Other Fees 7,764,0D0 3,932,931 3,831.069 50.66%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - I I/
Interest&Misc.Receipts 1,041,000 915,901 125,099 87.98% V
Other - 50,742 (50,742) -
Total Revenues 11,281,000 6,522,120 4.758,880 57.a2% L
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 5,431,000 2,135,530 3,295.470 39.32%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 87,0D0 5,113 $1,687 &88% L
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3.958,000 3,209,182 .748.818 81.08%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,040,000 3,385,706 1,654294 67.18% 11
Distinct Operating&Other Expenditures 593.000 388,142 204,858 05.45%
Total Outlays 15,109,000 9,123,673 5.985.327 60.39%
Capital Facilities Budget Review II '
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L,I
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3/31/99
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress - 5,113 - 5.113
Share of Joint Works 16,428,139 2,135,530 - 18,563,669
Sub-Total 16,428,139 2,140.643 - 18,568,782
i y
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398
Collection Unes and Pump Stns. 6,903,000 - - 6.903,000
Treatment Facilities -
Disposal Facilities 11.593 - - 11.593 t
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 58,241 - - 58,241 id
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 73,837,297 (205,173) - 73,632,124 _
Other Assets at Cost Less Amod. - - -
Sub-Total 80,891,529 (205,173) - 80,688,358 1..'
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 97.319.668 1,935,470 - 99,255.138
W
L
Section 4-Page 2
L
" Budget Review by Revenue Area
r Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,1999
Operating Budget Review
h
1997-98 Year-To Remaining Year-To43ate
Budget Date Budget %Expended
y REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
Tax AlotationslSulown5ors(Share of l%) 9,575,000 6,319,396 3,255,604 66.00%
Connection Fees 2,500,000 2,369,294 130,705 94.77%
DOW Fees 23,973,000 14,032.992 9,940,008 58.54%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
,� Interest&Misc.Receipts, 5,958,000 5,037,938 920.062 84.55%
Other - 139,656 (139,656) -
Total Revenues 42.006,000 27,899.276 14,106,724 66.42%
r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt.Plant 14,524,000 5,724,084 8.799.916 39.41%
District 7nmk Sewer Construction 2,131,000 953,184 1,177,81e 44.73%
COP/Bond Redrement and Interest Expense 10,302,000 8,499,554 1,802,446 82.50%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 14,370,000 9,897,108 4.472,832 68.97%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,775,000 1,385,11M 1,389,082 49.94%
Total Outlays 44.102,000 26,459,898 17,642,102 60.00%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance AdjustrneMs Transfer to Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 631,047 953,184 (295,825) 1.288,406
Share of Joint Works 44,034,032 5,724,084 - 49,758,116
Sub-Total 44,865,079 6,677,268 (295,825) 51 W,522
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517,694
v.� Collection Lines and Pump Stuns. 97,076.157 (295,825) - 96,780,332
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172
General Plait and Admin.Facil. 215,549 - - 218,549
Equity in Joint Treament Facil. 197,506,072 (141,440) - 197,364.632
Other Assets at Cast Less Amon. 14,089 (14,089) - -
.+ Sub-Total 295,365,733 (451.354) - 294,914,379
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 340,030,812 6,225,914 (295,825) 345,960,901
w
r
Section 4- Page 3
1998-99 Third Quarter Report U
Revenue Area No.3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 I
Operating Budget Review
1998.99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended j
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 10,313,000 6.842,508 3,470,492 66.35%
Connection Fees 1,800,000 1,S57,771 242,229 86.54%
Other Fees 23,328,000 13,717.705 9,608,295 58.81%
Sale of Capacity Rights _ - _ I ;
Interest&Misc.Receipts 6,888,000 5.598.812 1,289.188 8128% IVf
Other - 141,921 (141,921) -
Tot it Revenues 42,327,000 27.858.717 14,468,253 65.82% I J
Y
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 14,923,000 5,976,358 8,946.642 40.058E
District Trunk Sewer Construction 6,977,000 3.484.032 3,492,968 49.94%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 9,469,000 7,673,902 1.795.098 81.04%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13.085,000 9,500,900 3,584,100 7261% I
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,365.000 1,042,438 1,322,562 44.08%
Total Outlays 46.819,000 27.677,630 19,141.370 59,12% -
U
Capital Facilities Budget Review —
Balance Adjusbnents Transfer to Balance Li
7/1/98 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199 _
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 14.901,704 3,454,032 (11,181.867) 7.203,889
Share of Joint Works 45,974,719 5,976,358 - 51,951,077
Sub-Total 60,876,423 9,460,390 (11.181.867) 59,154.946
y
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Lard and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 74,414,552 (11,181,867) - 63,232,685 x
Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 —
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419 I
General Plats and Admin.Facil. 320,153 - - 320,153
Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 206,177386 (115.466) - 208.061,920 _
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. _
r
Sub-Tonal 281,230,663 (11,297,333) - 289,933,330
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 342,107,086 (1,836,943) (11,181,867) 329,088,276
L
Ij
L
Section 4-Page 4
U
y
II Budget Review by Revenue Area
�1 Revenue Area No.5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1998.99 Year To- Remaining Year-To-0ate
!� REVENUES: Budget Date Budget %Expanded
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) -
TaxAlloraticnsrSubventions(Share of l%) 2,612,000 1,81$477 799,523 69.39%
�+ Connection Fees 500,000 128.014 373.985 2520%
Other Fees 2,730,000 1,733,258 998,742 63A9%
Sale of Capacity Rights _ _ _ -
y. Interest&Misc,Receipts 1,642,000 1,375.384 286,616 83.76%
Other 18,715 (18,715) -
Total Revenues 7,484,000 5,065.848 2,418,162 67.69%
r_
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tmd. Plant 2,006,000 788,113 1.217,887 39.29%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,079,000 1,925,947 2,153,053 47.22%
COP/Bond Retiremerd and Interest Expense 1.789,000 1,550,384 238,616 86.66%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,844,000 1,249,034 594,966 67.74%
'—' District Operating&Other Expenditures 864,500 451.438 413,062 52.22
Total Outlays 10,582,500 5,964,916 4.517,584 56.37%
k
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 1,861.682 1,925,947 (928,221) 2,859,408
Share of Joint Works 6.062,766 788,113 - 6.850,879
Sub-Total 7,924,448 2.714,060 (928,221) 9,710,287
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69.740
Collection Unes and Pump Sins. 34,300,512 (928,221) - 33.372,291
Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7.347
Disposal Facilities 7.115 - - 7,115
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39.402 - - 39,402
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 27,219,658 (45.907) - 27.173.751
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - -
ra
Sub-Total 61,643,774 (974,128) - 60,669,646
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 69,568,222 1,739,932 (928,221) 70,379,933
�1
kw
Section 4-Page 5
x4
u
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review 4
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to4Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tau Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - -
TaxAJlocations/Subventions(Share of 1%)
IRWD Fees - - -Other Fees - 19,283 (19,283) -
Sale of Capacity Rights _ - _ _
Interest&Misc Receipts 410,000 341.160 68,840 83.21%
Other - 15,790 (15.790) -
Total Revenues 410.000 376,233 33,767 91.76% I
u
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trnt Plant 1,676,00D 664,909 1,011,091 39,67%
District Trunk Sewer Const ucaon 932,000 578,627 353,373 62,08% V
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 153,000 89,982 63,018 58.81%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,153,000 852,767 300,233 73.96% j
District Operating&Other Expenditures 211,500 120.154 91,346 56SI% W
Total Outlays 4,125,5D0 2,306,439 1,819,061 55S1%
u
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustrnents Transferto Balance Y
7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: II
Consbudw in Progress 2,053,393 578,627 - 2,632,020 Y
Share of Joint Works 5,114,989 654,909 - 5,779,898
Sub-Total 7,168,382 1243,536 - 8,411,918
61
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Lad and Property Rights
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 25.602.567 - - 25,602,597 LI
Treatment Facilities - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - - I
General Plant and Admin.Fall. 6,747 - - 6.747 LI
Equity in Joint Treabnerft Fall. 22.639,161 550,282 - 23,189,443
Other Assets at Cost Less Anom _ _ _ 1
Sub-Total 48,248,475 550.282 - 48,798.757 u
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 55,416.857 1.793.818 - 57,210,675 ; 1
V
Section 4-Page 10
U
Budget Review by Revenue Area
r Revenue Area No.5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,1999
Operating Budget Review
1998-M Year To• Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
„y REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - -
TaxAllocations/Sulwentions(Sham of l%) 2,612,000 1,812,477 799,523 69.39%
r Connection Feas 500,000 128,014 373.986 25.20%
Oher Fees 2,730.000 1,733,258 996.742 63A9%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
,d Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,642,000 1,375,384 266,616 83.76%
Other - 18,715 (18,715) -
Total Revenues 7,484,000 5,065,848 2,418,152 67.69%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Taint Plant 2,008,000 788,113 1,217,887 39.29%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,079,000 1.925,947 2,153,053 47.22%
COPMond Refirement and Interest Expense 1,789,000 1,550,384 238,616 86.66%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,844,000 1,249.034 594,966 67.74%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 864,600 451,438 413,062 52.22%
Total Outlays 10,582,500 5.964.916 4,617,584 66.37%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjushnents Transfer to Balance
711198 &Additions Fred Assets 3131M
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
+1 Construction in Progress 1,861.682 1,925,947 (928.221) 2.859,408
Share of Joint Works 6,062,766 788,113 - 6,85g879
Sub-Total 7,924.448 2,714,060 (928,221) 9,710.287
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69,740
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 34,300,512 (926,221) - 33,372,291
Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347
Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 39,402 - - 39.402
Equity in Joint Treatment Fall. 27,219,658 (45,907) - 27,173,751
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - _ _ _
~ Sul -Total 61,643,774 (974.128) - 60,669,646
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 69,568,222 1,739,932 (928,221) 70,379,933
r
d
Section 4-Page 5
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No.6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year•To-nats
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
Tax AllocationstSubven0ons(Sham of 1%) 1,194,000 831,640 362.360 69.65%
Connection Fees 100.000 50,493 49,507 50.a9% L
Other Fees 3,586,000 2,301,390 1,284,610 64.18%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - 1 r
Interest&Misc.Receipts 1,219.000 1,029,540 189.460 84.46% y
Other - 17.865 (17.865) -
Total Revenues 6,0991000 4,230,928 1.868.072 69.37%
r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint works Trmt.Plant 1,838,000 725,533 1.112.467 39.47% i i
District Trunk Semer Construction 3.101,000 750,212 2,350.788 24.19%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1.135,000 928,930 205.070 81.84%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,550,000 1,255,374 294.626 80.99%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 225,500 156,539 69,961 69.11%
Total Outlays 7,850,500 3,816,588 4,033,912 48.62%
61
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance y
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 3,192,091 750.212 (2,357.930) 1,584,373 W+
Share of Joint Works 5,581,355 725,533 - 6,306,888
Sub-Total 8,773,446 1.475.745 (2,357,930) 7,891,261
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: _
Land and Property Rights 562 - - 552
Collection Unes and Pump Sins. 5,157,361 (2,357,930) - 2.799,431 M
Treatment Facilities 2,653 - - 2,653
Disposal Facilities 7,394 - 7394 I
General Plant and Admin. Fadl. 113,761 - - 113:761 L.I
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 24,911,510 104,569 25,016,079
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - -
Sub-Total 30,193,241 (2,253,361) - 27,939,880 u
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 38,968,687 (777,616) (2,367,930) 35,831,141
Ww
WJ
Section 4-Page 6
U
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operadna Budget RBVIew
1998A9 YearvTo- Remaining Year10-090
Budget Data Budget %Eipanded
v�l REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) _ - _ _
Tax alaraliordSubverNans(Share of l%) 2,980,000 1,969,451 1,010,549 66.09%
r Connection Fees 50g000 607,717 (107,717) 121.54%
Other Fees 7,426,000 3.460291 3,965,709 46.60%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
,� Interest&Misc Receipts 1,593,000 1,190,570 4OZ430 74.74%
DPW 46,580 (46,580) -
Total Revenues 12,499,000 7,274,609 5,224.391 58209%
OUTLAYS:
Share ofJoart Vibdm Trot Plant 4,854.000 1,981,481 2,892,519 40.41%
r District Trunk Sever Construction 4,065,000 1,971,867 2,093,133 48.61%
COP/Bond Rebranan and Interest Expense 1,974,000 1,659,014 314,986 64.04%
Share of Joint Nbnks Operating Expenses 4,714,000 3,233.54Q 1,480,460 66.59%
Dishict Operating&Other Experdbaes 1,&X,500 813,657 690,843 54.08%
Total Outlays 17,111,500 %639,559 7,471.941 56.33%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjustinia. Trarslerto Balance
711188 &Additions Fomd Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
44 Construo6on in Progress 4,361,999 1,971,857 (3,405,264) 2,928,602
Shamof Jdnt Nbfke 15,089.216 1,961,481 - 17,050,697
r
Sub-Total 19,451,215 3,933,348 (3,405,264) 19,979,299
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 1,578,665 - - 1,578,655
Collection Lines and Rmrp Sire. 41,514,588 (3,405,254) - 38,109,324
Treabre nt Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10,782
Gem Plant and Adnam Facil. 98.197 - - 98,197
F_gwty in Joint Treahrent Faal. 67,975,501 (344,491) - 67,631,010
OffwAssets at Cost Less Anxxt 65.557 (22,865) - 42,692
Sub-Total 111.243.280 (3,772,620) - 107,470,660
Total Property,Plant&E-qulprrmn&CIP 130,694,495 160,728 (3,405,264) 127,449,959
en
r
Section 4-Page 7
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53.99%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 2,165,000 1,419,522 745,478 65.57%
Connection Fees 500.000 97,711 402,289 19.64% IJ
Other Fees 4,154.000 2.651,938 1.512,062 63.69%
Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 60,000 -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 1.299,000 1.115.324 183,676 86.86%
Other - 32.507 (32,507) -
Total Revenues 8,188.000 5,322,401 2,865,599 65.00% l !
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tmd. Plant 3,470,000 1,357,196 2,112,504 39.11%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 1.388,000 238,654 1,149,346 17.19% .0
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,645,000 1,331,753 313,247 80.96%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,938,000 1.946.464 991.536 66.25%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 715,500 557,128 158,372 77.87%
Total Outlays 10,156,500 5,431.195 4,725,305 53.48% —'
W
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 7.703,440 238.654 (7,405,143) 636,951 IYY!
Share of Joint Works 10.440,594 1.357.196 - 11.797,790 _
Sub-Total 18.144,034 1,595.850 (7,406,143) 12.333,741 U
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: _
Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986
Collection Lines and Pump Sans. 19.094.427 (7,406,143) - 11,688.284 kit
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 30,682 - - 30.682
Equity in Joint Treatment Facll. 46.880.113 (84,667) - 46,795,448
08mrAsaets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - -I
Sub-Total 66,155,261 (7,490,810) - 58,664.451
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 84.299,295 (5,894,960) (7,405,143) 70,998,192 I j
Section 4- Page 8
U
Budget Review by Revenue Area
y Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,1999
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
,r REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond FurM(s)Only)
Tax AlloaBons/Subventions(Share of l%) - - - -
Connection Fees 400,000 746.586 (346,586) 186.66%
Other Fees 826,000 618,505 207,495 74.88%
Sale of Capacity Rights _ - _ -
e, Interest&Misc.Receipts 598,000 500.929 97,071 83.77%
Other - 5.294 (5,294) -
Total Revenues 1,824,000 1,871,314 (47,314) 102.59%
wr
OUTLAYS:
Share ofJoird works Trent Plant 562,000 222,940 339,050 39.67%
District Trunk Serer Construction 144,000 - 144,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 19,000 15,296 3,704 80.51%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 506,000 380,416 125.584 75.18%
`+ District Operating&Other Expendthims 24,00D 3.866 20.134 16.11%
Total Outlays 1,255,000 622,518 M482 49.60%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjusanents Transfer to Balance
711/98 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r Construction in Progress _ - _ _
Share of Joint Works 1,715,026 222,940 - 1,937,966
Sub-Total 1,715,026 222,940 - 1.937,965
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Slane. 3,033,824 - - 3,033,824
Treatment Facilities "
Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Admin.Fad[. - - '
Equity in Joint Tr alment Facil. 7,709,858 (22,159) - 7,687,699
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. _
Sub-Total 10,743,682 (22.159) - 10,721.523
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 12,458,708 200,781 - 12,659A89
a+
r
Section 4-Page 9
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Operating Budget Review L
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Yeardo-0ate
Budget Data Budget %EtpanUW
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) -
Tax Allorafions/Subverdions(Share of 1%) - - -
IRWD Fees _ _ - L
Other Fees - 19,283 (19.283) -
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - I
Interest&Misc.Receipts 410,000 341,160 68.840 83.21%
Other - 15,790 (15.790) -
Total Revenues 410.000 376,233 33,767 9136%
`r
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tart.Plant 1,676,000 664.909 1,011,091 39.67% 11
District Trunk Sewer Construction 932,000 578.627 353,373 62.08%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 153,000 89.982 63,018 68.81%
Share of Jant Works Operating Expenses 1.153,000 852.767 300,233 73.96%
District Operating 8Dither Expenditures 211,500 120,154 91,346 56.81%
Total Outlays 4,125,500 2.306.439 1,819,061 55-91%
W
Capital Facilities Budget Review II fI
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L.I
7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131199
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Construction in Progress 2,053,393 578,627 - 2,632,020
Share of Joint Works 5,114,989 664,909 - 5,779,898
Sub-Total 7,168,382 1,243.536 - 8,411,918 J
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: _
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 25,602,567 - - 25,602,567 I"
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin.Fadl. 6,747 - - 6,747
Equity in Joint Treatment Fall. 22,639.161 550,282 - 23,189,443
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. _ _ _ _
Sub-Total 48,248,475 550.282 - 48.798.757
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 55,416.857 1,793,818 - 57,210.675
Section 4-Page 10
U
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
r Percent of
Actual Budget Remaining Actual
1998.99 Through Through 1998-99 Through Increase
ti Budget 3131199 3131199 Budget 3131/98 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves' 2,609.160 2,059,473 2,494,793 (435,320)
r Revenues
2. In-Lieu Premiums - - - - -
r 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 135,000 76,274 56.50% 68,726 95.335 (19,081)
4. Reimbursements from Other Funds 160,000 306283 191.43% (146,283) 214,194 92.089
S. Total Revenues 295,000 382,557 129.68% (87.557) 309,529 73,028
r
r Expenses
6. Salaries,Wages and Benefits 4,500 4,500 - -
7. Benefits/Claims 130.000 149,084 114.68% (19,084) 238,537 (87,453)
n
8. Contractual Services 5,000 1,394 27.89% 3,606 5,576 (4,182)
9. Legal Services 300,000 440,454 146.82% (140,454) 285,958 154,496
10. Professional Services 5,000 1,068 21.37% 3,932 2,347 (1,279)
11. Supplies&Other 500 (16) -3.24% 516 9,816 (9.832)
12. Sub-Total Expenses 445,000 591,985 307.51% (146,985) 540,234 51.751
13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 83,619 69.68% 36,381 91,404 (7.785)
14. Total Expenses 565.000 675,804 119.68% 110604 631,638 43,968
r 15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (270,000) (293,046) 108.54% 23,046 (322,109) 29,063
16. Ending Reserves* 2.339,160 1,766,427 75.52% 572,733 2,172,684 (406,257)
r
.r
•Includes$687,300 long term receivable due from the County of Orange.
r
r
Section 5-Page 1
r
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review 1J�
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,1999
perce'd Yd
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
199 -99 Through Through 1998.99 Through Increase
Budget 3131199 3131199 Budget 3f31/98 (Decrease) V4
1. Beginning Reserves' 659,609 563,272 665,621 (102,349)
Revenues
2. In Ueu Premiums 225.000 164,2W 73.00% 60,750 160,770 3.480
3. Interest&Miscellaneous 35.000 19,923 56.92% 15,077 24,241 (4.318)
4. Total Revenues 260,000 184,173 70.84% 75,827 185,011 (838)
Expenses j
5. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - - - - -
6. Benefits/Claims 250,000 147,453 58.98% 102,547 201.341 (53,888) -
I
7. Contractual Services 25,000 - 25,000 18,750 (18,750)
8. Legal Services 5,OD0 9,671 193.42% (4,871) 8,607 1,064 -
9. Professional Services 30,DW 12,023 40.08% 17,977 - 12,023 V
10. Supplies&Other - - 583 (583)
i
11. Sub-Total Expenses 310,000 169,147 54.56% 140,853 229.281 (60.134)
12. Excess Loss Policy 25,000 16,290 65.16% 8,710 15,892 398 .
13. Total Expenses 335,000 185,437 55.35% 149,563 245,173 (59,736) y
14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (76.DDD) (1.264) - (73,736) (60,162) 58,898
15. Ending Reserves' 584,609 562,008 96.13% (73.736) 805.459 (43,451)
(N
r,l
Includes$139,231 long tern receivable due from the County of Orange.
V
Section 5-Page 2
u
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
General Management Administration (Division 110)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure treatment cost does $486/MG $477/MG Costs below Gallonage charge due to lower
not exceed target by end of than anticipated expenditures through 9
fiscal year months. Lower than expected flows have
*increased*this calculation.
Ensure District meets 521.5 FTEs by 511.75 FTEs Target currently met.
adopted five year staffing and of fiscal year
plan
Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
with Permit Compliance
Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 40% Expenditures well under target through thres-
CORF Budget by end of quarters. See Engineering Section.
year
Ensure District Performance 80% 81%Performance Performance objectives have been met for the
Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives(in 3rd qtr) 3rd quarter. Workplan milestone tasks are
milestones met within Objectives 70%Workplan behind,largely due to unanticipated Y2K
targets 80%Workplan Milestones(through 9 efforts. Note that with GM approval,some
Milestones months) scheduled workplan tasks can be delayed to a
subsequent quarter given appropriate
justification.
Districts-Wide Not
Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
Through V Quarter
250 176 59 15 70%of workplan tasks that were scheduled
(and not delayed with GM approval)were
completed.
NOTE: The General Manager approved some V Quarter Workplan tasks for delay. These do not appear in the
above table. Approval requires staff to specify valid reasons for project delay to a subsequent quarter.
Section 6-Page 1
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Administration (Division 210)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Average Annualized Rate 6% 6.10% The portfolios(long/short term and cash Sow
of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective
benchmarks. Figures based on current yield
calculations.
Average Interest Rate 4% 2.60% 1%is equivalent to approximately$1.7M
Paid on Certificate of annually in interest savings based on variable
Participation(COP) rate COPS that are not protected by a long-term
Borrowing interest rate exchange agreement.
Ensure 100%of insurance
programs renewed on Fees at/below 100%renewals met at Premium costs and brokerage fees were
schedule and FY'98 targets less than$88K reduced from prior fiscal year.
commissionsHees ME
590.000
Remain at or under the 545.2 Million by $31.7 Million months Expenses are being controlled well. 70%of
net Joint Operating (J.O.) end of fiscal (70%total) budget has been expended at 75%of year.
year
Workplan Tasks
Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
5 1 2 2 Some projects behind/not-started due to
deferral by Commiftee/GM.
Section 6-Page 2
Performance Objectives
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Accounting (Division 220)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance
Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Issue monthly financial Results due to turnover of one Principal
_ reports within 10 working 92% 56% Analyst and one Sr.Accountant.
days
Develop FIS OneWodd 90%trained by 15% Remainder of training deferred to FY
Training program year end 99/00 due to delays in OneWorld
implementation.
Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 90% Study to be completed early by year's end.
study
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 1 1 0 Complete migration to One World FIS
behind schedule largely due to Y2K
efforts and One World upgrade.
Section 6-Page 3
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 9 Months r.
Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 97.99% 3rd Quarter cycle counting program met
program Rating benchmark target.
r
Complete by Research Stage Behind.Project may be delayed due to a
AT Inventory Contract 2/99 retirement and re-assignment of staff to
Y2K program.
Plant 1 Barooding System Complete by Proposal Review Stage Behind. Products have been demonstrated
3199 and staff is reviewing Proposals.
Implement Procurement Complete by Preparation Stage Behind.Application with AMPS(forwarded.
Card Program 3/99
Develop Quick Reference Complete by N/A Deferred.
Guide 3/98
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
Technology projects delayed largely due
4 t 2
to Y2K efforts.
r
Section 6- Page 4
.a
Performance Objectives
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT
Communications (Division 310)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 89% Missed one of nine months.
Turnaround Time 100%of time
Board Minute Preparation 10 day 78% Minute's turnaround was delayed in
Turnaround Time turnaround September and December due to vacation.
100%of time
Employee Satisfaction 3.0 score N/A This survey will be conducted in the 4th
Rating(Communications quarter.
Audit)
Photocopying Services 93%+ 96% Benchmark target exceeded.
Satisfaction
Graphics Services 95%+ 100% Benchmark target exceeded.
Satisfaction
Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%+ 95% Benchmark target exceeded.
Rating
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
N/A
0 N/A N/A N/A
Section 6- Page 5
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 4101420/430') _
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Ensure Department 90% Pending Will be fully reported in 4th quarter.
achieves 90%+of budget
performance objectives
Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 86% Target met.
Pump Stations meets or
exceeds target
Ensure that collections 90%+spots 86% Approaches target.
trouble spots are cleaned on '—
maintained on schedule schedule
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 76% Target met.
Fleet Maintenance Division
meets or exceeds target
Ensure planned/preventive 75%Planned 8 62%Preventive Investigation underway as to reason for ..
maintenance to corrective Preventive 38%Corrective increased comective maintenance+
maintenance ratios meets Maintenance
targets 25%Corrective
Maintenance ..
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete I Behind Started Summary of Data
3 2 1 0 Behind schedule on production of report
detailing results of outreach program.
'Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined this
quarter for reporting purposes. r
r
r
r
r
Section 6- Page 6
Performance Objectives
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 510/520')
Performance Objective 1998.99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Percentage of supervisor 20.5%by years 21.5% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains
salaries to total does not end below private sector average but does not
exceed 20.5% yet achieve benchmark.
(private sector=25%)
HR Department managed 90-100%of 61%expended through This is trending well below end-of-year
within budget budget 9 months. target largely due to training budget
encumbered but not debited.
Achieve 5-year staffing plan 621.5 FTE's by 511.75 FTE's through This is below our end-of-year target.
projections years end end of quarter
Ensure Department 90% N/A Complete data will be fully reported in 4th
achieves 90%+of budget quarter.
performance objectives
'Ensure staff receive all 95%by years 87%through 3rd Approaches benchmark target.
mandatory training end quarter
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
5 4 1 0 Utility team training course behind
schedule.
'Note that Human Resources and Training Divisions have been combined for this quarters reporting purposes.
r
r
Section 6- Page 7
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Safety& Emergency Response (Division 530) _.
Performance Objective 1998.99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Resolve Service Requests 90% of time 98% Customer Service remains a division
within 2 work days priority. This also represents a significant
improvement over last two years'
objectives of a 75%15 day turnaround and
90%f3day turnaround, respectively.
Ensure Injury Incidence is 7.6 incidence 6.6 The objective is below industry standards. r
45%below industry rate
average
r
Lost Work Day Case 3.8 Incidence 2.5 Target has been met and is significantly
Incidence Rate 50%below rate lower than established benchmark,
industry average
r
Workers Compensation $403 $250 Costs were negligible the first half of the
Cost Factor 30%below fiscal year due to negligible medical costs
industry average for those few injuries occurring.
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
12 10 1 1 One project deferred due to Y21K.
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section e - Page 8 '
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620)
Performance Objective 1996-99 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Conduct all core ocean 100%of time 100% Target met.
monitoring sampling within
NPDES parameters
Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100% Deadlines 100% All regulatory deadlines met.
and complete associated
reports
Distribute high priority 60%Within 7 day 100% Target met.
legislation information to turnaround
appropriate staff with 7
working days
Ensure 100% spill incidents 100%within 5 days 100% Target met.
reported within 5 working
days.
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
4 4 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6- Page 9
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630) _
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Maintain monthly sample Within 10%of +7% Target met. Range of+q%to+30%for
analyses within"productive" multi-agency individual lab sections with average within
range benchmark benchmark target.
Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 97%on lst analysis Target met.
on laboratory samples 1st analysis;
100%on 2nd
Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of Jan. 98%, Feb.96%, Internal standards established in November,
analyses established Mar. 95% '98. Turnaround times met standards in last
norm three months of records.
r
Workptan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
r
r
Section 6-Page 10
r
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
._ Source Control (Division 640)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Maintain field inspection 2.5 monitoring 2.7 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note,
productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods
data is for 1 st quarter of FY 98/99.
Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal.
actions within 30 days of
non-compliance event
Issue industrial wastewater 100%of timI
100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal.
permits prior to expiration
Revise and develop local Complete 100roject on-going 100%of scheduled tasks to-date are
limits for pollutants of of project by e complete.
concern of year
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6- Page 11
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
(Division 710/720')
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Manage Engineering CORF 80%+ 40% Due to unanticipated project delays and other
Budget expended by issues related to internal reporting, finalizing
years end contracts,etc.,less has been expended than
anticipated.
Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 85% 81/95 projects bid on schedule.
established Capital
Improvement Program
schedule
Meet design project 80%+of time 91% Target met. 49/54 milestones either met or
milestones officially moved due to increased project
scope.
Meet 90%of project Complete 100% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule, r
milestones for Strategic Plan project by 3/99 milestones have been met.
Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The District has responded to all inquiries w
correspondence within 30 within 30 days.
working days
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
7 4 3 0 Behind schedule on project management
traning tasks and others largely due to
unanticipated Y2K efforts.
'Note that Engineering Admin.and Planning & Design Division have been combined for this quarter's reporting
purposes.
r
r
Section 6-Page 12
Performance Objectives
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Construction Management(Division 730)
Performance Objective 1998.99 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 9 Months
Target Change Order costs 5% 5.06% Change order costs are always based on a
at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four
original contract amount quarters. Target has been met.
(industry standard=7.25%)
Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 62.5%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a
Occupancy In facilities days 37.5%-240 days running average of the preceding four
within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target has been met.
days
Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 3.65% Target has been met based on QC
Inspections and average no inspections.
more 10%correctable
deficiencies
Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 82% Target has been met.
within 20 days greater
Workpian Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
_ 2 1 1 0 Behind schedule on written submittal
policy and procedures.
Section 6-Page 13
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Administration (Division 810)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure Operations 9312/million 9303/million gallons Target met.
treatment cost per million gallons treated treated
gallons does not exceed
target
Ensure Total Injury 12.2 17.77 Reported on calendar basis. Two months
Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) data. Safety researching injury rate issue.
more below industry
average
Ensure Five-year staffing 209.25 FTEs by 206 FTEs Target at.
plan figures are met end of year
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of
0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Section 6-Page 14 ..
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Operations & Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 8201870)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure utility,chemical, 90%100% Total contracts On target.
biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 91.8%
contracts are managed annualized
within budget
Ensure Capital Outlay 80%+of time -80% Project milestones met.
Revolving Fund(CORF)
project milestones are met
Respond to trouble- 80%+ 100% Target met.
shooting and service
requests by established
priority time frames
Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.42 Target met
kilowatt hour($/kWh)
'Maintain therms/kWh at .111 therms/kWh .109 therms/kWh- Within targeted parameters.
Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1
(kilowatt hour)within .106 therms/kWh .107 therms/kWh-
targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2
'Maintain FERC efficiency 42%or greater 67% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit
at Central Generation requirements thus gaining favorable natural
plants within targeted limits gas transmission rates.
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind .Started Summary of Data
2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks complete.
'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 15
1998-99 Third Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Plant Operations (Divisions 830/840) —
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 77%Plant 1 Target met.
Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 73%Plant 2 —
Process
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 51%Plant 1 Primary basin rehab project
(BOD)Removal Targets in Primary and Plant 2 43%Plant 2 impacted P2 numbers although
Treatment Process final effluent within norms.
Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25%(1 hour 9% Plant 1 Overtime much lowerthan
total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 18%Plant 2 benchmark due to light training
targets hours leave taken) schedule and transfer of Sr.
Plant Operator to P1 night shift.
Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.1% Plant i See above.
does not exceed targets salary 2.0%Plant 2
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
4 1 3 0 Delays due to extension of Title
V permitting schedule.
Section 6- Page 16
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Maintenance Divisions(Divisions 8501860)
Performance Objective 1998.99 Target Performance
Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 49.5% Target met.
Time in Mechanical
Maintenance Division
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 44% Increased capital project commitments and
Time in Electrical& DART implementation impacts wrench time
Instrumentation Division completion.
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 63%
Time/Direct Support Time Target met.
in Mechanical Maintenance
Division
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 60.5% Target met.
Time/Direct Support Time
in Electrical&
Instrumentation Division
Ensure preventive <100% 62% As maintenance tasks are rescheduled with
maintenance backlog in improved maintenance intervals, backlogs
Mechanical Maintenance is will continue to fluctuate widely from quarter
less than 100% to quarter. This program should be
completed over the next year.
Ensure preventive <100% 56% See above.
maintenance to in
Electrical&Instrumentation
is less than 100%
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 1 1 0 Development of procedures behind
schedule.
Section 6- Page 17
1998-99 Third Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Air Quality&Special Projects (Division 880)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Through
Target 9 Months Summary of Data ..
Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% performance objective is on target.
deadlines
Complete approved 80%,projects 3 of 9 completed Target met.
research projects including completed by 5 of 9 in-progress
project planning, design and year's end 1 of gin planning
field investigation —
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter Complete Behind i Started Summary of Data
9 4 3 2 Some projects delayed largely due to many
factors external to the division.
Section 6-Page 18
Performance Objectives
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 9201930/9401950')
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Resolve all help desk calls 80%+within 5 77% Approaches benchmark target.
days
Ensure limited radio-system Less than.5% 0.08% Target met.
outages
Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 99.54% Target met.
Up-time'
Maintain Database"Up- 95%+ L99.720%. Target met.
time"
Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both Target met.
"Up-time" plants
Workplan Tasks Not
Third Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
8 1 7 0 Y2K project has significantly impacted
progress on various other planned
activities. Some milestones behind on
Y2K project though will be completed by
12/99.
*Note that Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined this quarter for
reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 19
1998-99 Third Quarter Report
U
L
L
L
U
L'
This Page Left Intentionally Blank i.
U
L
L
L
L
U
U
L
u
Section 6-Page 20
u
Orange County Sanitation District
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
OCSD 3/31/99