Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-03-24 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 17, 1999 ,bane.l]i a1962 2411 NOTICE OF MEETING telling aaanssi 20. Ba.e127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS °a 22728812 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ,tress sasses,: CA touna a leAvenue Fountain Valley. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. in 92]oaaota DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 M,mber Agencies • The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County clm., Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Maine. Brae Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley :y Fullerton v` carean Grove Bb rd Sec r Huntington Beech ry ne Le Habra La Pelme Lee Aleer"e° Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Newport Beech Orange Plecende Bents Ana STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC Seal Beech Stanton COMMITTEE Re STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, March 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m. Patin Nile Perk rorbe ones ORIENTATION FOR NEW DIRECTORS TO THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND ct.ecv a arnau. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 1, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. SeMory Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND Coate Mae CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 1, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. Miewny D'y OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND Water Districts TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE GWR SYSTEM - Tuesday, April 27, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 28, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. -To Pr et act the Pubac Hall and Me Emincrec nt Mrsugh Eseegence,In lbbetawetar 91'rtets- BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting April April 28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July *July 21, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November *November 17, 1999 December *December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 April April 26, 2000 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING MARCH 24, 1999— 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, If necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section ` 54954.2(b). 0324/99 Page 2 of 7 6. Consideration of the following actions regarding Certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System: a. Verbal staff report b. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-01, Making Certain Findings Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System; adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-02, Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System has been completed in compliance with CEOA. 7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on February 24, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/99 0228/99 Totals $4,821,397.93 $3,131,021.38 03/24/99 Page 3 of 7 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 10. Receive and file Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief from Claim Requirement filed on behalf of former employee Michael Rozengurt (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 806118), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 03/24/99 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 24, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 24, 1999 and the Steering Committee/Executive Management Committee Retreat Minutes for the meeting held on February 20, 1999 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re March 3, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 3, 1999 to be filed. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re March 4, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES - NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 4, 1999 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$60,150, increasing the total contract amount to $35,689,903; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-36-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. d. Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-40-3, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Pave West. e. Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $989,809; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing execution of the ` Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with AirPol Construction, Inc. f. Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional funds for Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total project budget of$1.811,000. g. Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc. ' 03/24/99 Page 5 of 7 h. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, with Verve's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an addition of$250 increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and (2)Accept Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Verve's Plumbing, Inc. 1. (1) Ratify Change Order No.1 to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$262,274, and 203 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,656,974; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a total project budget of$4,232,000. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re March 10, 1999 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 10, 1999 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1999. d. 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Makesense, Inc., for utility and telecommunications auditing services; and 2)Approve such services on a contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) a not-to-exceed 50%fee for all recovered overcharges, and b)the equivalent of 12 months savings for all implemented cost reduction strategies. 16. (1) Authorize execution of a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach providing for reimbursement by the City for two City projects to be constructed by the District in conjunction with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3; and (2)Authorize payment by the District to the City of Huntington Beach in an amount not to exceed $20,000 providing for AC pavement overlay in connection with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3. 0324/99 Page 6 of 7 17, CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). 2. Confer with General Counsel re David Deese v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 786591 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 3. Confer with District's Negotiator re negotiations of new and pending agreements with employee representatives (Government Code Section 54957.6). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ' 21. Adjournments 03/24/99 Page 7 of 7 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 HAcap.d a�dminOSAgendaW249 .draR.dm ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: March 24,1999 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ ✓ _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................�� ✓ — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................. ✓ — (COOK) ............................ COLLINS........................ ✓ — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... ✓ �L — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... a — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �_ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... �L — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... i// i — (WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON................... (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... — (MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... ✓ ✓ _ (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... v- — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. Ll ✓ — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... CL CL� _ (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. �/ — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATfERSON................. a L — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ / — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................— _ (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... / ✓ — (MILLER).......................... SWAN.......................... .� — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ✓ — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson ✓ Ghirelli Hod es Kyle Ludwin ✓ McIntyre ✓ Miles Ooten Peterman Streed ✓ Tuchman ✓ OTHERS.- Woodruff Andrus 03/24/99 WadonW"kwp.MeletlMn%BSTIRECTOROlmdore Roll Call.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7 - 2 Y - 9 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. s c. NAME: (please print) IoroY /�Gui�✓+r� HOME ADDRESS: I5 fi 4 L To PA (number/street) Wt5rf INgq( L , CA , 9u&3 - yztl (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: 5 L't 15 PA,.,$rQ C I.JA A,.)5Vyi 0 Cv" OF p, C , (self/name of organization) Nadon`data?%wp.cfiMadmin\8ST0RMSWequmt to Speak.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. /n DATE: 3I AGENDA ITEM NO. U� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) 4r6taen� T HOME ADDRESS: 1000 la ZZ=9 S •— (number/street) ,At (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7/'y'5--/ 3 REPRESENTING: Vtww 676c fr (self/name of organization) \YadonWatat\wp.dta)admiNBSTORMSR"uest to Speak.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 2, AGENDA ITEM NO. . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) Reel> 4 . IG�D'�w ^ 'T`/ HOME ADDRESS: �OZO � f'� ILG4 ��7C TE RR/fC� (number/street) (city/zipde 240. ` /Z ZVTELEPHONE: Q 4 REPRESENTING: )RAA)CW W (self/name of organization \tradonN tal W,p.dta\admin�BSWORMSVRequeat to Spwk.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 3-2 AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) � "r (city/zip cod TELEPHONE: REPRESEN �� (self/name of organization) WadonWeta7Nvp.dta�admin�BSXFORMSVRequm to Speek.doo SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT �-I I `o BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) PPtt rt al- 0U,t A21�0 toa AGKII_APL .s pN,c W C61A+w(3W&— C ors ✓er 2rf d640D L�GC W G {L iGL 1NG L ,✓,� rz ,Ei✓ o ,E rJl� V, C 4-6-4e c r I/ � L1 �P 5+ tJ,Svr fit... w5 OW-wc AMA �GI C /' IMG, O IIVIQ � � N$OY✓� C IS H:WP.OTAWDMIN%W1F0RM ZJGN-IN FORK. 1 eMt111 r O \O CITY OF ANAHEIM.CALIFORNIA Planning Department ,OOMOte 1,� March 23, 1999 Thomas M. Dawes, Project Manager Orange County Water District/County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: Comments on the Final Program EIR for the Groundwater Replenishment System(GRS) Dear Mr. Dawes: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above-referenced document. A number of issues remain that are of concern to City staff. Staff requests that prior to finalizing the environmental documentation,the following comments be addressed. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Water Services Division 1. (Response L3-1) We are pleased that OCWD has agreed to conduct risk assessment studies for Phase 1 of the project. It should be clarified that we request a Health Risk Assessment, not just risk assessment studies. Also, it will be important to have Health Risk Assessments conducted to consider possible health impacts during Phase 2 and 3 of the project, particularly since some of this water may not be treated to the same degree as Phase 1-water. 2. (Response L3-2) The quantity or quality of public outreach programs that OCWD has conducted or plans to conduct in the future is not disputed. It is only requested that OCWD verify the effectiveness of the programs. City staff believes that it is important that our residents understand that this water was formerly sewer water and accept that the treatment methods adequately purify it. Anaheim residents must accept the fact that purified sewer water will be used as drinking water in the near future. It is recommended that additional meetings be conducted with the public in layman's terms rather than in scientific terminology to assure the decision-makers that affected customers fully understand the project. 3. (Response L3-3) It appears that OCWD has concluded that the GWRS is the most cost- effective alternative because the GWRS was only compared to the more expensive alternatives. 200 South Anaheim Boulevard P.O.Box 3222.Anaheim,California 92803 • (714)765-5139 • w .anaheim.net Final Program EIR for Page 2 the Groundwater Replenishment System Comments in the FEIR identified several alternatives that were considered in the DEIR before deciding on the proposed project. The FEIR states that several of these alternatives included such projects as seawater desalination, purchase of additional imported supplies and constructing additional storage reservoirs in locations such as Gypsum and Miso Canyons. The FEIR only commented briefly on the alternatives identified in our letter dated January 6, 1999. These alternative projects should be analyzed in more detail to ensure that the best alternative, or the best mix of alternatives, is selected. The report identified in the FEIR and entitled 'Water Supply Alternatives to Meet the Future Needs of the Orange County Water District' estimates future demands considering water conservation activities currently being implemented by water agencies. However, both the DEIR and the FEIR fail to consider the significant amount of additional savings potential that exists with full and aggressive implementation of all of the Best Management Practices(BMPs). 4. (Response L34) Staff accepts OCWD's pledge that no river water will be displaced in Phase 1 and that subsequent analyses will be conducted prior to Phase 3 to ensure maximum use of river water. The Cities of Orange and Santa Ana also commented that there appeared to be a lack of capacity in the spreading basins. The response to this comment did not address the impact of the 50%blending requirement. It remains unclear whether the blending requirement will result in costly Project water(blended with costly SWP water) displacing low-cost river water, especially as river flows increase over time due to upstream development. The description of wintertime operations addresses a single storm event. It does not identify how the facilities would be operated during a storm longer than 8 hours or during long duration-storm events as can occur during El Nino conditions. 5. (Response L3-5) City staff fully agrees with your statement that 'water conservation is an extremely important project'. The FEIR does not adequately address the fact that the GWRS and water conservation should be done as a combined effort. If the County fully and aggressively implemented the BMPs, significant reductions in future demands would be realized. Since most of these water use efficiency programs cost less than $300 per acre foot to implement, it would seem more cost effective to implement these water supply enhancement programs,thus requiring a significantly reduced scope of project for the GWRS. As an example,the potential savings for replacing all toilets in Orange County with ultra-low-flush models are over 75,000 acre feet per year. This savings potential could greatly reduce the amount of groundwater recharge necessary to accommodate the projected increase of 180,000 acre feet of water per year by the year 2020. 6. (Response L3-6) As previously mentioned, since water conservation is a cost-effective source of additional water supply and significant water savings potential still exists from Final Program EIR for Page 3 the Groundwater Replenishment System implementation of existing BMPs, those programs should be implemented in conjunction with the GWRS to minimize the magnitude of the proposed scope of the GWRS project. 7. (Response L3-7) It appears that a much smaller project could be realized if OCWD only considered projected increased water demands in their service area. 8. (Response L3-10) City staff still believes that the Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Effects Study is pertinent to the Groundwater Replenishment System, though we concur that it does not apply to the project water quality. 9. (Response L3-13) In order to assure adherence to DHS standards for dilution, retention time, and buffer zones, Anaheim staff requests that OCWD not apply for a"research and demonstration" waiver for this project. - 10. (Response L3-14) City staff feels this is satisfactory as long as the engineering report is completed and made available for use in the Health Risk Assessment. 11. (Response L3-15) It is requested that OCWD provide the City, at this time, with the hydrogeological data to confirm the 12 month retention time and 2,000 foot buffer zone. 12. (Response L3-16) As long as OCWD will operate the spreading basins to maximize utilization of low cost river water, the position regarding recharge operations is accepted. However, the response that the FEIR is primarily for Phase 1 leads to the assumption that another EIR will be prepared for Phases 2 and 3. The Draft and Final EIR did not state they were for Phase 1 only. All potential environmental impacts of the project should be considered prior to acceptance of the project. 13 (Response L3-17) As mentioned in response to L3-3,the referenced project alternatives should be analyzed in more detail to ensure that the best alternative, or more importantly the best mix of alternatives is selected. Staff accepts OCWD's assurance that additional project alternatives, including additional points of injection, will be evaluated. 14. (Response L3-18) A thorough analysis to select the optimum disinfectant should be made. The response indicates that only a cursory analysis was performed. It is important to acknowledge and address the fact that disinfection byproducts may continue to form once the project water is mixed in the aquifer. 15. (Response L3-19) City staff is pleased that increased treatment will be provided for recharge water in Phase 1 of the project. The response references Figure 2-13 to determine water quality during Phase 3 and since an updated Figure was not provided in the FE1R, we must assume they are referencing Figure 2-13 from the DEIR. Clearly,the water quality in Phase 3 is lower than in Phase 1. Any health risk assessment should utilize the most conservative(i.e. lowest)water quality data. 16. (Response L3-20) Staff is pleased that RO will be used for all recharge water during Phase 1. However, it is noted again that the response indicates that the DEIR focused on Final Program EIR for Page 4 the Groundwater Replenishment System Phase 1 and subsequent analyses will be conducted for later phases. It is therefore assumed that another Environmental Impact Report will be necessary prior to implementation of later phases. 17. (Response L2-22) The response partially addressed the question by stating that Kraemer Basin will receive only project water and imported water while Anaheim Lake and NMer Basin will receive river water and imported water. However, the response also states that key physical conditions of the recharge operation at Kraemer Basin have not yet been determined. Our comment suggested that OCWD should know the recharge conditions before initiating the project. As evidenced by the number of comments by the cities of Anaheim, Orange and Santa Ana regarding the recharge basin capacity and operations, the document should provide a comprehensive analysis of the expected utilization of the basins, project water, imported water and river water. 18. (Response 1.3-26) As previously mentioned, simply comparing the GWRS to other 'new' sources of supply precludes consideration of alternatives that utilize existing sources of supply or a combination of several existing alternatives that provide an overall minimum total project cost or a reduction in the quantities of'new' supply needed from GWRS. It is not adequate to only compare the GWRS costs to very expensive and/or politically unattractive alternatives such as ocean desalination, construction of new storage reservoirs, or new reclamation facilities. 19. (Response L3-30) The explanation regarding total nitrogen for Phase 1 of the project is accepted. However, disinfection byproducts may form in the subsurface after project water is mixed in the aquifer. Also, water quality for Phases 2 and 3 was not addressed in the response. Per prior comments, staff believes that a subsequent EIR will be necessary to address impacts of these later phases. 20. (Response L3-31) The detailed information provided by OCWD on water quality of project water is appreciated. It was noted, however, that Revised Table 3-4 indicates TOC level of 0.1 mg/L while Revised Figure 2-12 shows 0.3 mg/L. Also, staff believes that it is important to include TTHMs and chlorinein the Gstof water-qualityparameters- 21. (Response L3-32) Figure 3-9 shows that three of Anahern's production wells are within the 2,000 foot buffer zone. Mitigation measures should be included for all wells within the buffer zone regardless of modeling results. 22. (Response L3-34) As previously mentioned, It is recommended that a Health Risk Assessment be conducted, not just "risk assessment studies." We also recommend that the health risk assessment be conducted by an independent third party. 23. (Response L3-45) City staff would like to commence discussions with OCWD regarding opportunities to enhance the visual quality of the Kraemer Recharge Basin. Final Program EIR for Page 5 the Groundwater Replenishment System 24. (Response L347) This comment seems to capture the Hill recommendation of our report, although the comment does not specify how the health risk assessment will be conducted or when. It is anticipated that OCWD will conduct the health risk assessment as implied by their comment. This health risk assessment, however, should be conducted prior to approval of the project, and certainly prior to the onset of the project. 25. (Response L348) Table 2 adds detail not present in the original report and is helpful. The table does not, however, provide details on microbial infection in general, and for the particular microbes mentioned in our previous review. We presume that this information will be developed for the health risk assessment. 26. (Response L3-51) This post treatment monitoring system will be useful for some of the microbes(e.g. coliforms), but the viral microbes will be more difficult to detect due to a lack of readily available detection methods. How will this lack of methodology be addressed? It is recommended that an upper bound limit be set on the likely concentrations in the treated water. 27. (Response L3-52) The ability of the OCWD to monitor for these microbes is important. The point of the original comment in our report, however, is that there is no mention of how tap water concentrations will be determined. Is the monitoring system capable of detecting regrowth during distribution? Or, is this considered outside the responsibility of the OCWD? In addition, the report and the replies do not address how the OCWD monitoring system will detect the full range of microbes for which there is public health concern. For many of these microbes, the detection methods available to OCWD will not be adequate. That is why the health risk assessment should be conducted before such microbes begin to be released into the groundwater aquifer. 28. (Response L3-53) The presence of the monitoring system after treatment is encouraging. The main issue that will remain is whether the system can detect most of the microbes of interest, or at least detect suitable surrogates/indicators. We are encouraged by the comment on the conduct of a health risk assessment, as this will help determine whether accidents-such as seal leaks are really a-cause for conce= If they tum,out-to-produce- small risks, then the inability of the monitoring system to detect all classes of microbes is of less concern. 29. (Response L3-54) Again, this is an encouraging comment. The key issue will be the detection of microbes in the water emerging from the treatment system, so sampling of that water at regular intervals will be important, Further, it will be important to determine how long microbial contamination might be present before detection, and then to determine the resulting exposures and whether disease might occur prior to detection. Still, the frequent tests of membrane integrity, etc., mentioned in the comments will help allay much of this concern. Final Program EIR for Page 6 the Groundwater Replenishment System 30. (Response L3-55) Again, this is an encouraging comment, although the term"intimate understanding" is perhaps a bit too strong given the current state of ground water modeling and the validation of such models. It is hoped that the model mentioned will form the basis for the health risk assessment calculations. The key issue will be the degree of validation of the model against at least limited testing in the aquifer. What still is not clear is whether the model is capable of use in assessing efficacy of the proposed salt water intrusion barrier. 31. (Response L3-57) The response does not adequately address the issue raised in our review. The point of our review comment is that the project report does not perform a systematic analysis of alternative sources of water for the three uses, demonstrating that these three uses may best be met by reclaimed water. Whether the reclaimed water is safe is not the primary issue here. The issue is whether this is the best use of the reclaimed water relative to other water sources. 32. (Response L3-58) The OCWD is to be commended for committing to a health risk assessment. The real issue will be how that assessment is conducted, what it will take into account, etc. Our comments were directed towards the details of the assessment. The response would have been more helpfirl if it had mentioned which of the recommendations in our report would be satisfied by the proposed assessment, and the methods that would be employed. We recognize, however,that these details may not be available at this time, and urge the OCWD to consider peer review of the risk assessment protocol before conducting it. 33. (Response L3-59) This comment will be alleviated following the Health Risk Assessment mentioned. Until we am the actual design of the study, however, we cannot determine if the specific scientific issues raised are being addressed. Electrical Eneineedne Division 34. (Response L3-38) Mitigation Measure No. U-2(Table ES-1)is-noted; however,, it does not fully address our original comment. The City of Anaheim has future Underground Conversion Projects along Miraloma Avenue and La Palma Avenue. Please incorporate the following mitigation measure into the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Along Miraloma Avenue, two casings ten feet apart will be required under the new pipeline; one for the 12 kV underground distribution circuits and one for the 69 kV underground transmission circuits. Should you wish to discuss any of the comments or if you have specific questions, please direct them, as appropriate: Final Program EIR for Page 7 the Groundwater Replenishment System Public Utilities Department: Water Services Division - John Hills, Environmental Services Manager at (714)765-4277 Electrical Engineering Division- Ed Murdock Sr. Electrical Engineer at (714) 765-4178 Questions outside of those referenced above may be directed to me at (714)765-5139,Ext. 5440. Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comment on the document. Please forward any subsequent public notices and/or environmental documentation regarding this project to my attention at: City of Anaheim, Planning Department, Room 162, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. Sincerely, 1;ucy N. Yeager Senior Planner cc: Tom Wood, Deputy City Manager Jack White, City Attorney Ed Aghjayan,Public Utilities General Manager Bob Cars, Public Utilities Assistant General Manager Water Services Don Calkins, Water Engineering Manager John Hills, Environmental Services Manager Mahendra Garg, Principal Electrical Engineer Ed Murdock, Senior Electrical Engineer Richard-Mayer,Park Planner grseir6.doc SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING March 24, 1999-7:00 P.M. RE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. a. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director La Palma Paul F. Walker Kenneth Blake Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith b. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any H:\w ElaUgenda\Board Agendas\1999 Board Agendas\032499suppremenlal doc It's best Checklist for an Orange CountV Sanitation District to be prepared! EMERGENCY provisional toilet Living in California means living with the reality that a major earthquake can hit at O 5-gallon plastic bucket with any minute. Preparing for such an event a tight-fitting lid will help you get safely through a disaster. O 2 boxes heavy-duty trash can liners (8-10 gallon size) with ties A We depend so much on household D 1 gallon liquid chlorine bleach utilities for both comfort and security that or other toilet disinfectant its hard to imagine living without them. PRlPAREDNESS ) � O 2 boxes baking soda It But, putting all comfort aside,there's one household utility that offers more than O 2 large boxes heavy-duty trash can simple comfort; it also protects your liners (30-gallon size) with ties health and the environment around O 6-8 rolls toilet paper you.That household utility is O Hand sanitizer to clean and disinfect your sewer system. hands without water O Feminine products What to do O Paper towels if your sewer Knowing D Moist towelettes or baby wipes system becomes what . . . if your sewer system becomes damaged or inoperable will It's easy, damaged or not only help you get through a so be prepared! inoperable ` Wt ephp y,O FOR Sreq /N�. disasterearthquake, it will also help _. Ixss � Ni r.7fls Kamm protect your health and the W/1 Far additional information,contact ! environment. - the Orange County Sanitation District communications Department at p14)aR&P011 visit our welasite at www.ocad.com Importance of your household sewer system In the event of a major disaster such as an earthquake,the sewer system in your area may become damaged or inoperable. Damaged sewer systems are health hazards. It is important to get damaged septic tanks,cesspools, pits and leaching systems into service as soon as possible. Trained personnel from local environmental regulatory ��.. agencies can help with these problems. 0 If your local sewer system becomes inoperable,there are proper procedures you can use to temporarily replace Y your toilet and safely dispose of sewage while service is being restored. In our continuing effort to protect public ` health and the environment,the Orange County Sanitation District has prepared the following step-by-step plan to assist you if an earthquake or any other disaster causes your local sewer system to fail. We recommend that you keep these guidelines close at hand because you never know when you might need them. Now to create a provisional toilet 1 If sewage lines are broken but toilet bowl is usable, place a a trash can liner inside the bowll and fallow the disinfectant . . ,and safely dispose of sewage procedures below. If the toilet is completely backed up, use a bucket with a trash After using the provisional toilet,you will need another can liner and make a toilet seat out of two boards placed container to empty the contents for later disposal. parallel to each other across the bucket. For greater comfort, The second container should be lined with a 30-gallon size you can remove the seat from your household toilet and place trash can liner. As bags from the provisional toilet fill up,they it on the bucket. should be placed in the second container for safe disposal. 2 Every time you use the provisional toilet, pour or sprinkle a small amount of regular household disinfectant, such as NEVER deposit human waste or garbage on the open chlorine bleach (DO NOT mix chlorine with other disinfectants ground.This will not only pollute the environment but it as it can produce a dangerous chemical reaction), baking soda can also create a serious health hazard. or laundry detergent to keep down odors and germs. If you have no other alternative for disposal, it is safe to bury waste in trenches 24-30 inches deep. Cover the container tightly when not in use `{J and replace the trash can liner when waste has accumulated. NEVER use a provisional toilet that is not lined with a plastic bagl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary March 17, 1999 phone: n141 962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors nulling edam.: Ro. Be,8127 Subject: Board Letter Po ,,tern valley.CA 9272E-8127 •01•t•dd"••' The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 10844 Ellie Avnce' on on any of the items, lease call me. r iiatdln VaOay.CA Y P 92708-7018 Change in Board Meetino Time Mau er At the last Board meeting you were asked for your preference in the start time of the Apenan monthly Board meeting. Based on the results of that survey, the meetings will begin e at 7 p.m. effective March 24. cafe. Ananein, New Active Board Members Brea eadna Park Supervisor Jim Silva has been appointed to serve on our Board, replacing Todd Fbanhic, fry Spitzer as the Orange County Board of Supervisors representative. Jim previously Fuaartan served two years on the Board representing from Huntington Beach. He was also a Borden Brace member of the Building Committee, the predecessor of the PDC Committee. Huntington erects 9 li Welcome back, Jim. Le Habra La Pelme s Lad Paul Walker, Alternate Director, has replaced Eva Miner-Bradford as the eac Newporrtt Beean representative for La Palma. Orange Place= since Ana Saar eaecn CEC Announces Heavy-duty Demonstration Program Funding Shannon ma"" The California EnergyCommission CEC recently announced it is making u to villa Perk ( ) Y 9 P yorha Linda $575,000 available in grant funds to cost-share up to 50 percent of the cost of Count, or orange qualifying heavy-duty alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) demonstration projects. Referred to as "Round 2" of the CEC's HD AFV Demonstration Program, up to $50,000 per vehicle with a maximum of$150,000 per grant application is possible. This program s.nftsr, Districts is intended to increase the numbers and use of HD/AFVs consistent with the CEC's Costo Made strategic goals and plans. It works to reduce emissions and petroleum use while Midway sty increasing alternative fuel usage in California's transportation sector. ' Water Districts To be competitive, the HD/AFV engine system, vehicle, and/or component Irme Rench technologies demonstrated should document engine performance, fuel economy, energy efficiency, durability, reliability and consumer requirements of the emerging AFV technologies. End-user companies, non-profit organizations, or public agencies are eligible to apply only in partnership with an original equipment manufacturer or technology developer. Technology developers and original equipment manufacturers may apply only in 'ra Protect the Pattie Health and the Environment through Excellence 11 wastewater Systems' Members of the OCSD Board Page 2 March 17, 1999 partnership with private or public entity end-users. Example vehicle platforms include shuttles, trash trucks, agricultural produce trucks, road maintenance vehicles, package delivery trucks, transit and school buses or other long-haul, high-mileage high usage applications (i.e. greater than 35,000 miles or 700 hours of operation annually). A minimum of 50 percent cost share is required. At least 10 percent of project costs must be a documented, verifiable cash contribution from a project team member or a non-Commission source. Applicants are invited to submit proposals before April 16, 1999. To request an application packet for your city or agency, call Mike Trujillo at (916) 654-4566, McKinley Addy (916)657-0833, or Jerry Wiens (916) 654-4649. Ask for the Heavy-duty AFV Demonstration Program application. The application packet is also available on-line at htto://w .eneray.ca.aov/contracts/1999-02-23 heavy- duty.htmi. Petroleum Violation Escrow Account(PVEA) Fundina Repeated from last week's CNGVC e-mail, preliminary reports out of the California Department of Finance Offices estimate that the PVFA will fund an estimated $15M in projects for 1999-2000. This funding, that comes with minimal use restrictions, must be applied for through your local State Assemblyperson or Slate Senator. If you have worthwhile projects that require additional funding, the PVFA may be a good source. It is recommended that interested parties submit letters providing project details to their local Representative or Senator immediately. ARB Oka Carl Mover Program At the first Air Resources Board (ARB) meeting featuring newly appointed ARB Chairman Allan Lloyd, the Carl Moyer Program was given final approval for implementation. The Moyer Program authorizes $25 million in incentives towards emission reductions from heavy-duty diesel powered engines, including trucks, buses, trains, ships and agricultural equipment. Matched with contributions from local air districts, the amount available is actually$37.5 million. Staff will continue to monitor r this program and consider the appropriateness of participating. SCCWRP's 301h Anniversary The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) is celebrating its 30th anniversary with a party at the new Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific. As a founding member of this joint powers agency, OCSD has benefited tremendously over the years from the ocean research conducted by SCCWRP on behalf of its member agencies. The celebration will take place Sunday evening, May 2, between Members of the OCSO Board Page 3 March 17, 1999 7:30- 11:30 p.m. The aquarium will be closed to the general public that evening so this is a great opportunity to tour the exhibits and share stories about SCCWRP's past and future. A flyer announcing the event is attached. If you are interested in attending, please complete the enclosed flyer(blue sheet) and return it to my assistant, Jean Tappan, by April 14, or call her at 7141593-7101. The District will pay for your admittance and will reimburse you for parking upon submittal of the parking receipt. Odor Complaints We continue to receive complaints from our neighbors, and staff routinely evaluates process operations to help solve the problem. However, there are instances when our Collections crews go that extra mile to assist those most impacted by our operations. As an example, please read the attached e-mail on Odor Problems Across from Plant No. 2. It is indeed a pleasure to have such dedicated employees. Biosolids Fact Sheet I have attached a Biosolids Fact Sheet that was presented at a Kem County Board of Supervisors' Science meeting that provides a good educational base on the biosolids issues. Earthquake Preparedness—What to Do If Your Sewer System Becomes Damaged or Inoperable Our Communications Department has created a new brochure on protecting health and the environment in the event an earthquake damages the sewer system. The County of Orange has volunteered to distribute this brochure along with others that they have prepared to assist the public with emergency preparedness. If you would like additional copies, please contact Michelle Tuchman at 7141593-7120. Water Transfers: More than an Engineering Solution The San Diego County Water Authority needs water for urban development, and the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) would like to sell it to them. However, there are numerous institutional and legal hurdles that must be overcome to reach this goal. Between IID and San Diego are the water rights and concerns of the Coachella Valley Water District and the Metropolitan Water District. Each of these agencies wants Members of the OCSD Board Page 4 March 17, 1999 assurances that their ratepayers will not unfairly bear the burden of the proposed transfer. This issue is important to the District since it demonstrates the need for "new"water sources in Southern California and supports the Groundwater Replenishment System and other cost-effective reuse projects. By way of brief background, San Diego needs to use Metropolitan's All-American Canal to wheel the water from IID to San Diego. Metropolitan was concerned about cost-shifting due to San Diego's new supplier, but it received a measure of satisfaction after Governor Wilson signed legislation providing $235 million to line the All-American Canal to help conserve water. Metropolitan is supporting the transfer, but they remain concerned about IID's ability to conserve the water from its agricultural users to meet San Diego's needs. This is important since Metropolitan has lesser rights than IID to receive water from the Colorado River, and a lack of conservation by IID could result in less water for Metropolitan. To complicate the matter, the Federal Government may reduce water supplies to California to meet the needs of the other Colorado River slates. California has been averaging over 5.2 million-acre feel (MAF) of water per year from the mighty Colorado River, well in excess of its 4.4 MAF annual allocation. Interior Secretary Babbit has threatened to stop declaring surpluses on the river and force California to live within its allocation. The State is working on the California Plan designed to meet this requirement. Between the water rights of IID and Metropolitan is the Coachella Valley Water District. It has asserted that under the Boulder Canyon Project Act, any water not used by IID"exclusively' in its service area goes by right to them as the next in line. Coachella has filed numerous objections to the transfer based on legal and environmental impact concerns over the project. A booming economy, urban growth, and a move compound all of these issues by some farmers towards crops that require more water. The District's staff will continue to track developments regarding water transfers, and note that these issues highlight the need for the Groundwater Replenishment System project and other new sources of water. Endangered Species and Endanaered Proiects The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) has proposed the Santa Ana , Sucker(catoslomus santaanae) for listing as a Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Almost certainly, the District's proposed projects to protect and/or move the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line (SARI) and the Groundwater Replenishment System project would be subject to controls by the USFBWS. Such measures could include restrictions on the design, timing, and methodology of the project. Once the proposed rule is finalized, the fish would receive federal protection in the Santa Ana, San Gabriel and Los Angeles rivers drainage systems. The USF&WS has determined that the Sucker populations have declined due to dams, water diversions, Y Members of the OCSD Board Page 5 March 17, 1999 stream channelization and dredging, urban development (causing sedimentation, turbidity, and pollution), intensive recreation, the introduction of competitors and predators, and the isolation of populations (known as inbreeding depression). Although the USF&WS did not designate critical habitat in the proposal, conservation measure will still be required in the known range of the species, and the USF&WS must work to develop a Recovery Plan for the fish. In the Santa Ana River, the Sucker is known to live in the river from the Imperial Highway crossing upstream to the City of Riverside, about 60% of its native range. The USF&WS will provide"reasonable and prudent measures" that must be followed by any project proponent requiring federal approval or oversight. The Mainstem project along the Santa Ana River is designed to build the Seven Oaks Dam, the raising of Prado Dam, and the continued channelizalion of the river in Orange County. USF&WS specifically lists this project as one likely to impact the Sucker. They will likely require some form of mitigation or participation in the Recovery Plan, or its development, to compensate for the incidental take of the species. Note that the District's Environmental Sciences Laboratory is providing fish and water quality testing in a joint research project by United States Geological Survey, the Orange County Water District, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The results of this study should help to develop the Recovery Plan, draft reasonable and prudent conservation measures, and ultimately lead to the removal of the Santa Ana Sucker from the ESA list as a Threatened species. California Watershed Legislation The Orange County Council of Government's Executive Management Committee has taken an interest in three watershed-related bills in the California Legislature. None of these bills is known to have any direct or indirect impacts on the District's operations. The first two bills, Senate Bill 216 (Solis) and Assembly Bill 1355(Havice), create the San Gabriel Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the Eastern Los Angeles County Rivers & Mountains Conservancy, respectively. The conservancies would be empowered to acquire and manage lands within their jurisdiction in order to promote their legislative goals. Both bills have similar goals including using the river area to promote the development of open space, recreation, and watershed management. The sponsors seek to develop a more integrated river system, instead of one that primarily serves as flood control. Senate Bill 754 (Hayden)would create the Los Angeles River Commission which would work to develop a conservation and restoration plan for the Los Angeles River. The plan must be designed to maximize the beneficial uses of the river. The Commission would also serve in an advisory role to the State and local governments on projects impacting the river, including commenting on all Environmental Impact Reports for river related projects. These three bills would establish a "representative Members of the OCSD Board Page 6 March 17, 1999 for the river'which transcends current political boundaries; however, they do not create new regulatory, taxation, or condemnation rights. The District's staff is interested in these bills in as much as similar proposals in the Santa Ana River Watershed may follow. The District's participation in the Santa Ana River Watershed Group supports sustainable development along the river including water quality and supply, flood control, open space and recreation, and the protection of endangered and threatened species and their habitats. District's staff will follow the development of these bills. Inside Cal/EPA The scientific debate over the land application of biosolids continues to occur throughout the State of California and is not just restricted to Kern County. USEPA believes that the extremely conservative nature of the federal biosolids regulation and the best management practices employed by the California land appliers allows for complete protection of public health and the environment. The Central Della Water Agency's concems over biosolids land application were reported in "Inside Cal EPA" in March of this year and are summarized below. WRCB Biosolids Discharge Plan May Be Hazardous, Agencies Charge Date: March 12, 1999 The water board's proposed waste discharge requirements (WDRs) for biosolids have drawn the scrutiny of a Delta water provider and the California Farm Bureau (CFB), which are concerned that an ongoing environmental study will not adequately evaluate the potential threat to human health and the environment. The water provider fears that the sewage sludge will be too expensive to treat, and the CFB believes the material poses a threat to cops. "The considerable uncertainty associated with the environmental and public health impacts associated with the thousands of contaminants and pathogens present in biosolids must be properly factored into the decision-making when designating areas that are suitable for land application and when specifying the conditions under which biosolids may be applied to those areas," according to the Central Delta Water Agencys (CDWA) comments to the Water Resources Control Board. The issue arose four years ago after the Central Valley regional water board adopted general WDRs for the use of biosolids on agricultural land. A Califomia Environmental Quality Act negative declaration was prepared to justify the WDRs, but a petition by the CDWA and the CFB sent the matter up to the WRCB's purview; it was decided that a full environmental impact report (EIR) was necessary. The board Members of the OCSD Board Page 7 March 17, 1999 ruled, however, that 50 sites could be grandfalhered under the regional board's decision. An ensuing legal action resulted in a judge's order that the WRCB prepare the biosolids regulations; a draft EIR partially funded by the California Association of Sanitation Agencies is due May 21. Publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) dispose of biosolids on farmland with little expense while fanners enjoy the benefits of free organic material. Under U.S. EPA regulations, biosolids disposal requires minimum treatment standards to protect against pathogens and heavy metals deposition. Application standards also provide protection for surface and groundwater. Nationwide, about 54% of the POTWs surveyed dispose of biosolids through land application, said a wastewater engineer, who added that the proposed WRCB rule will be "more stringent" than EPA's rule in some areas. "We are taking a cautious approach and plan to recommend a disposal method which poses no threat to public health or environmental safety," said a WRCB source. "We're taking a more cautious approach than the Facts," But the CDWA views the matter with a bit more skepticism. "Given the conceded lack of an adequate scientific understanding of the full potential impacts from land application ... together with substantial scientific evidence demonstrating the clear potential for adverse impacts, the CDWA has been advocating and continues to advocate the prohibition of the land application of biosolids to areas that unreasonably and unnecessarily jeopardize the public and the environment," the agency wrote. CDWA questions whether land application is the most "environmentally superior" method of disposal, while noting that "the numerous gaps and shortcomings of ... EPA's ... regulations leave the Gear potential for significant adverse impacts on the environment." Included in the alleged lack of information is EPA's admission in a Federal Register notice that"dioxins, which may be present in sewage sludge, are not regulated not because they are believed safe but because at the time EPA initially screened pollutants for regulation it lacked data to evaluate dioxins for regulation." The CFB questions the validity of EPA's biosolids classification, including the unknown long- term consequences of field application, said a CFB source. "Our official policy is caution," he said. "Some of our members love it, some hate it, but the bulk of them are uncertain and don't use it." The cheap disposal costs for POTWs represents the financial bottom line, but EPA has also pushed land applications as a means of recycling waste, he said. 'The problem is, if you go through EPA's analyses and risk assessment, there's not a lot of data." The WRCB's process will "promote a higher Floor of awareness of this material." CDWA says, "it should be obvious" that adequate steps be taken to protect waterways from the contaminants in biosolids. Special attention should be focused to prevent applications "which create an unreasonable and unnecessary risk of Members of the OCSD Board Page 8 March 17, 1999 contamination of ... surface and ground waters." The agency recommends that the staging, storage and bulk application of biosolids be prohibited in areas with shallow depth to groundwater and that are within 850 feet from any well or surface waters. In addition, the EIR should thoroughly examine the potential impacts on water quality from biosolids application in flood-prone areas. "Substantial evidence" supports the argument that land application of biosolids may have a significant impact on groundwater quality and the EIR "should thoroughly investigate, document and discuss and analyze" how pollutants and pathogens migrate to groundwater and travel horizontally to nearby wells. In assessing the impacts of pathogens, CDWA notes that the potential harts to the public and the environment "have simply not been analyzed or considered by EPA" and that"to make matters worse, the evidence demonstrates that the pathogens present in biosolids have the potential to regrow after the biosolids leave the treatment plant." As a result, the risks to humans from cattle grazing on biosolids sites "may be unacceptably and unreasonably high." In order to minimize or avoid adverse environmental impacts, CDWA says the state should clearly set the conditions— soil type, soil pH, and existing levels of contaminants and pathogens in soil, climate— upon which it bases its findings of whether significant impacts will occur. Deficiencies in current regulations for biosolids application include lack of quality assurance, lack of effective pathogen detection methods, lack of adequate tracking of biosolids from POTWs to application sites and lack of any assumption of liability by biosolids generators or applicators for any contamination and cleanup, the group says. U.S. EPA supports the WRCB's efforts and is part of a technical advisory group that is fleshing out the issues, said the WRCB source. "They realize that site-specific conditions can require a more cautious approach," he said. Formal On-site Project Management Trainina Approximately sixty District staff members are currently participating in a University of California, Irvine, University Extension program. Coursework on an Introduction and Overview of Project Management is provided in morning and afternoon sessions that meet weekly for ten consecutive weeks. The course encompasses forty hours of classroom work in addition to reading and homework assignments. Engineers, managers, analysts and other staff with project management duties and responsibilities are attending the Project Management class. Thus far, the class has been well received. Dependent upon staffs final review of this introductory class, the District may provide additional on-site opportunities for advanced coursework in Members of the OCSD Board Page 9 March 17, 1999 Project Management. Ultimately, some staff may choose or be encouraged to obtain their official certification in Project Management by completing the entire nine-course curriculum. Source Control Y21K Update The Source Control Division is involved in a variety of Y2K education and outreach activities with industrial users of the District's facilities. A Y21K workshop will be presented jointly by the District and the County of Orange on April 8, 1999. Speakers will include representatives of the District; the Governor's Office of Emergency Services; the Orange County Health Care Agency; an attorney to discuss federal, state, and local enforcement issues; and a technical expert to discuss manufacturing processes. A second workshop is planned for the fall to update the community on the District's Y2K preparedness. The Source Control Division identified 88 industrial pennittees as critical. As of March 9, 1999, Source Control inspectors have personally contacted 111 industrial permittees to discuss Y2K, including 30 of the critical industries. Permittees are responding to the mass mailing sent in January 1999, with requests for information on the District's Y2K plan. The feedback indicates a high degree of awareness in the industrial community. Attached is a copy of the April 8, 1999, workshop program and agenda. Published Articles of Interest I have attached articles on issues of importance to the District that have appeared in various publications that may interest you. If y/ou'would like/additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM.jt w%"WANCMedG1AL£ANE $ro BOI.ee89N]WO ooc Attachments SCCWRP'S 3Oth ANNIVERSARY Sunday, May 2, 1999t Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific �~ 7:30 - 11 :30 p.m. $7 per person plus parking r~ * Tour the Aquarium Enjoy food and drink * Share stories about SCCWRP's past and futurey1 a * RSVP before April ,,�/Si ,AYe-Ar' '?4 ;Pleaae ja& as as roe cel du& 30 geaaa 4 aem=d 4 tke 5mase,w eal P=a &"a d Vatar ,Reaeetaek ;Vujeat. We fC alao die eoo»cbletl,w 4 arar fateat aegwa eu" (Figkt•98) at ae Aav#. D9k£87904M lake tke 770 9aeewruy wad gd&w tke algae. to dawxtoaw chow 1r"d arrd tke dfguanua+s exit: Ike o4pau'" ex[t"& &Ad to tke #a%& rg lot. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- RSVP (enclose payment and mail form before April 16) Please list the names of everyone in your party so we can provide personalized name tags: We will be attending the SCCWRP 30th Anniversary party: Your phone: ( 1 — Mail Form to: Debbie Hallock SCCWRP Payment enclosed: #persons x $7 = 7171 Fenwick Lane Westminster, CA 92683 Questions? call 714-894-2222 (Debbie) v a McIntyre, Donald From: Cook, Doug Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 10:08 AM To: Torres, Ed;Anderson, Blake; McIntyre, Donald; Dolan, Robert;Tuchman, Michelle;Hodges, Ed; Ludwin, David;Amordes, Nick;Winsor, Chuck; Heinz, Dave Cc: Velasco,Marci lo; Reed, Brian; Blanda,Thomas Subject: RE: Odor Problems Across from Plant no. 2 1 to would like to express my thanks, on behalf of Operations,to the staff involved in this effort. You know, how our neighbors view us is important, after all,we work for them. While we cant wave a magic wand and disappear,we can do,should do,and are doing, everything we can to minimize the impact we have on them, as best we can. Evidence for this is pretty straight forward in the work Marco Polo Velasoo, Brian Reed,and Tom Blanda and his crew have done on the issues below. The work they do representing this agency with the public is very important, and as we can see below, is of a very high level of performance. Thanks again. —Original Message— From: Tones,Ed Sant: Thursday,March N.1999 3:29 PM To: Anderson,Blake;McIntyre,Donald;Oaten,Robert;Tuchman,Mkhelle;Hodges,Ed;I in,Oavid,Cook,Doug;Arhontes,Nick; Winsor,Chuck;Heim.Dare Cc: Vebsco,MemoPdo;Reed,Brun;Blanca,Tlwmas Subject: Odor Problems Across from Place no.2 Plant no.2 over the past couple of months has received a large number of odor complaints from a group of residents living at Jonespod and Cape May streets. After initial investigation staff determined that it was not related to the treatment plant but rather to the sewer collection system. Staff within the O&M and GSA Departments have spent considerable time and effort over the past several months working with the residents, modifying our gas Flaps that were installed in the incoming lines and working with the City of Huntington Beach attempting to identify the problem, unfortunately,with Tittle success. I would like to report to you that we believe that we have identified the source of the problem and that the problem will be corrected. Yesterday the City of Huntington Beach, at our request,smoke tested their sewer lines connected to the affected residents. It appears that one of the residents who is an elderly woman did not regularly use her upstairs bathroom, and as a result the water trap in her toilet was dry. The smoke test revealed this problem and it is our hope that with regular use of her fixtures, any odors that may work its way back up the lines will be removed through her waste vent pipe on her roof and will not enter the house. The second resident had a slightly more complicated issue in that he had a broken waste vent pipe in his wall. This wall was adjacent to the intake of his house ventilation system and therefore any odors coming up through the vent pipe were being distributed throughout the home. The resident is taking steps to repair the broken line. I would like to commend the O&M (Marco Polo Velasco and Brian Reed)and GSA(Tom Blanda and crew)staff for their excellent work in persistently pursuing the problem and effectively working with the City of Huntington Beach staff and the affected residents to solve this problem. Ed Tortes 1 f SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET One of the most prevalent public misperceptions is that biosolids are raw human wastes. In actuality, biosolids are a valuable resource. Biosolids have been extensively treated using physical,chemical,and biological processes to the point where they are suitable for use as soil amendments and fertilizers. Another public misperception is that the chemical makeup of biosolids is unknown;the reality is that blosolids are one of the most studied materials in existence. What are Biosolids? Biosolids is a relatively new term for a product of wastewater treatment that may be beneficially used as a sail amendment and meets all regulations for such use. Biosolids are a subset of what Is commonly known as sewage sludge.The terms sewage sludgeorwastewater solids refer to the solid material produced during waste vidwtreatment. When the solids are treated and tested,they may meet the regulations required for recycling.Biosolids is a more precise term to describe that primarily organic portion of the solids which meets federal and state regulations for beneficial use by land application or other methods. The word biosolids originated from within the wastewater treatment industry when members sought to give a name to the clean, agriculturally viable product currently generated by modern wastewater treatment.Advances in technology and regulation have led treatment plants to create a product so significantly improved over traditional wastewater solids that the term for the new material was deemed appropriate. Biosolids, a twist on the use of biological processing of wastewater solids,was suggested by Dr. Bruce Logan of the University of Anzona. Water Environment Federation's(WFF)Executive Committee formally recognized the term in 1991and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(U.S. EPA)began using the word soon thereafter. "Biosolids'm used by most federal and many state agencies today and the term now appears in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. tenth edition. How Are Biosolids Produced? Virtually all the constituents of biosolids originate from the sewage which flows to municipal wastewater treatment plants. Municipal sewer-system users include households, commercial businesses, and industry. After screens and fitters remove larger items and grit from the sewage,the remaining solids are separated from the stream by a series of physical, chemical, and biological processes. In order to produce a clean effluent for discharge to water bodies. a variety of processes are employed to remove contaminants and pollutants. Most treatment plants use multiple treatment stages, several of which duplicate natural processes in rivers and streams. Primary treatment removes solids via the settling of heavy materials and the skimming of floating materials.The solids removed during primary treatment are called primary sludge. Secondary treatment removes biodegradable organic material through a biological process where bacteria consume the organic material remaining in the wastewater. The clean water and bacteria then go to settling tanks where the bacteria settle to the bottom as a stream called secondary sludge, biological sludge, or waste activated sludge. Biosolids are mainly composed of solids removed during the primary and secondary treatment processes which are further processed to stabilize the material. Stabilization reduces odors, quantity, and pathogens. The typical stabilization process used is anaerobic digestion. This is a process similar to human digestion where the solids are mixed and heated at high temperatures for an extended period of time, often in excess of 15 days, In the absence of oxygen and where bacteria consume much of the organic portion and produce methane gas and carbon dioxide. Current Regulation and What the Kern County Ordinance Will Add t The Unites States Environmental Protection Agency(U.S.EPA)published Standards forthe Use or DisposalofSewage Sludge,Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Pert 503(commonly referred to as Part 503),in 1993. Part 503 is a comprehensive,risk-based regulation that protects human health and the environment from pollutants of concern that can be present In blosolids. The rule was subjected to an external"scientific peer review, and public notification and hearings pnor to adoption. The U.S. EPA regulates the final use of biosolids according to the class of pathogen reduction,the degree of vector attraction reduction, and the concentration of regulated pollutants in the biosolids. To date there has been much 1 1p confusion with respect to Class A versus Class B pathogen reduction. Part 503 requires Class B biosolids to be used in combination with certain site restrictions to result in the samelevel of public health and environmental safety as Class A biosolids. The Kern County Ordinance 1) authorizes local permitting of all land application programs; 2)requires practices to comply with Part 503 regulations and numerous land management practices. 3) implements a county-wide land application information/dats base. and: a) includes an inspection and oversight program. The latter will allow the County access to all sites using biosolids and provide a mechanism of enforcement for any program operating Outside the parameters of the Ordinance. Why Should the Public Care About Blosolids? The public should be knowledgeable about the beneficial use of biosolids. In many cases,opposition to land application sites has centered on regional issues,such as the shipment of city biosolids to rural locations.Aside from regionalism, the most pervasive public concerns about biosolids land application appear to involve the release of trace elements to soil and groundwater,and human pathogens released to sewers by households and other sources. Federal,state,and local regulations based on sound science are the public's prime safeguard against potentially negative effects of biosolids reuse. Biosolids generally contain concentrations of metals greaterthan the concentrations in typical soil.Therefore,biosolids applications usually increase the concentrations of metals in soils. Most trace elements are immobile since they bind to the organic material found in biosolids, however, and tend to concentrate in the soil only as deep as biosolids are incorporated into the soil.The National Research Council found that where biosolids have been added to soil according to existing guidelines and regulations, consumers have reported no phytotomcity or accumulation of trace elements in plants attributable to biosolids. If the agricultural uses of biosolids follow state and federal regulations, no adverse effects should be expected or observed. The second main concern about biosolids is the transmission of pathogens contained in wastewater to human beings near biosolids land application sites. Blosolids contain the same pathogenic organisms found in the domestic waste of the population and in food-related industries. The pathogens found in raw sewage have included bacteria such as Salmonella, viruses such as Hepatitis A, and parasites such as tapeworms. Pathogen populations are significantly reduced through wastewater treatment and biosolids production. Except for the use of raw sewage or primary effluent on sewage farms in the late 19th century, there have been no documented cases of infectious disease resulting from biosolids use in the United States.No adverse effects have been reported resulting from ingestion of food plants grown in biosolids-amended soils. The National Research Council's review of the Part 503 rules took issue with only one aspect ofthe regulations pertaining to the survival of tapeworms in Class B biosolids applied to cattle grazing areas. The council concluded that U.S. EPA's Part 503 rule"appears to be... adequate for the protection of the public from the transmission of waste associated pathogens" What are the Benefits of Biosolids? Biosolids can provide essential plant nutrients,water, and organic matter which can improve the physical condition of soil and render it a more favorable environment to manage nutrients and increase water retention. Biosolids contain all the elements essential for the growth of higher plants. Because nitrogen and phosphorus are the most abundant major plant nutrients in biosolids, the material's agricultural use is almost exclusively as a supplemental source of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. Biosolids also contain all essential plant nutrients, with the possible exception of potassium, to satisfy most crop requirements. As with the addition to soils of other organic materials, such as hay and animal manures,the addition of organic matter accompanying successive biosolids additions improves the physical properties of soils.This,in turn, exerts a positive influence on water penetration, porosity, bulk density, strength, and aggregate stability. Sources • California Water Environment Association. 1998. CWEA Manual of Good Practice for the Agricultural Land Appication ofBiosi ids. Oakland, Ca. • Water Environment Federation. 1997. WEF/U.S. EPA Biosolids Fact Sheer Project. Biosolids: A Short Explanation and Discussion. Alexandria, Va. 2 MANUAL OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION Biosolids generated in California have been recycled as a soil amendment on home gardens and agricultural lands since the late 1920s. This recycling effort continued on a modest scale until the early 1970s when new state and federal water quality laws mandated 1)a reduction in pollutants being discharged into sewers and 2) higher levels of wastewater treatment by publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). Industrial source control programs effectively reduced the contaminant levels in sewer discharges and caused a significant decline in biosolids metal concentrations. Figure 1-1 shows the decline in cadmium and lead concentrations in biosolids from 1980 to 1996. Data are weighted averages from four large California facilities. each of which produces more than 80 dry tons of biosolids per day. This trend is typical for most POTWs which handle industrial discharges. Flgure 1-1 HISTORICAL DECLINE IN CADMIUM AND LEAD CONCENTRATION IN BIOSOLIDS Weighted Averages fmm Four Large(>80 dry Ions per day)California Facilities 100 Cd mg/kg dry weight) Pb(mgrkg dry weight) 900 Pb(Table I limn=640 mg/kg)90 800 Cd(Table 1 Limn=a5 mgtkg) 80 70D J Lead(mg/kg) 70 ,� Cadmium(mg/kg) 600 isoD i 50 4D0 40 CA(Table 3 Limit=39 mg4cg) 41 e,...Pb(Table3Umit-3100 300 30 a �( gmLSfw^�.�tU• 4[4 $gxr;N •yrTi.;: 200 20 10 — 00 • 0 ._ .. 0 1980 1981 19a2 19B3 1994 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 i POTWs improved wastewater treatment by upgrading and expanding treatment processes, thus, greatly increasing the quantities of biosolids generated. Subsequently, POTWs and academia further investigated and refined land application and other recycling practices to manage these increased quantities. This, in turn, resulted in a greater scientific understanding of the safety and benefits of biosolids recycling and increased the interest of POTWs in beneficially recycling biosolids. SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #5 : TRACE METALS WHAT ARE TRACE METALS? Trace metals are part of the fundamental building blocks of the earth. Soils, water, and bedrock naturally contain these elements in varying concentrations. They include metals like arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead,mercury,molybdenum, nickel, selenium, and zinc. Trace metals are present in throughout the environment including soils, food, humans, animals, plants, and biosolids. N DO BIOSOLIDS CONTAIN METALS? Yes, biosolids contain trace concentrations of metals. WHERE DO THESE METALS COME FROM AND HOW CAN THEY BE CONTROLLED? The trace metals found in biosolids come from both industrial and residential sources. In the past, industry was a major contributor of trace metals. Controlling trace metals in biosolids is founded on the adage that"an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." Your local clear,water treatment plant has created an industrial pretreatment program to protect the quality of biosolids and the discharge of treated wastewater. Over the past 15- years concentrations of trace metals were significantly reduced in biosolids by requiring certain industries to pre-treat their process wastewater prior to discharge to the sewer system The local agency enforces the pretreatment program through random, unannounced inspections and sampling. The result is that biosolids quality improved dramatically so that it may be safely recycled. Residential contributions originate primarily from common household products. Control of residential contributions of trace metals to biosolids is accomplished largely through public education and household hazardous waste collection programs. DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT METALS IN BIOSOLIDS? Trace metals in excessive concentrations in our environment or in biosolids are a concern for the health of plants, animals, and humans. Even though trace metals are present, if they occur in concentrations higher than a desirable range there is an increased risk of negative impacts from the metals. - Many trace metals belong to a group of metals that are so insoluble or strongly bound to soil or plant roots that they do not move into edible plant parts regardless of the quantities present in soil. Chromium, mercury,and lead are examples of this group. WILL THE USE OF BIOSOLIDS CONTAMINATE MY LAND WITH TRACE METALS? Because trace metals contained in biosolids remain in the soil,their presence at elevated levels was the focus of the earliest,most detailed research in the area of biosolids beneficial use. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and many research scientists _ throughout the country developed concentration standards for trace metals in biosolids to For fuller information about biosolids-contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean wamr urr anent plant or get in much with Charles Egigiw-Nichols,BioSource Concurring 1197 Timberg®e Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548. BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #5 : TRACE METALS irrespective of the metals source. If a fanner or home gardener desires even moderate success under low pH conditions,they would need to at least add some lime to obtain reasonable crop yields.This results in a self-regulating and protective mechanism. The soil-plant barrier concept is founded in the bio-chemical link between cadmium and zinc. "Unless the proper pH level and Cd:Zn ratio is maintained zinc plant toxicity will first occur resulting in substantially reduced plant yields.Thus,zinc becomes a natural factor which limits the cadmium risk to consumers of these crops. Either the grower maintains a reasonable soil pH for crop production(which protects them from increased crop and diet cadmium),or eventually,when soil pH drops enough to allow high cadmium uptake and potential cadmium risk, zinc phyto-toxicity reduces crop yield and hence reduces potential for consumption of cadmium-enriched crops." Chaney, R. L. and J. A. Ryan. 1993. Heavy Metals and Toxic Organic Pollutants in MS W-Composts: Research Results on Phytoavailability,Bioavailability,Fate, Etc. In H. A.J. Hoitink,et al (eds.). Science and Engineering of Composting:Design, Environmental, Microbiological, and Utilization Aspects. Ohio State University. t ' Last revised 7.24.98 For further infotrwion about bio olids,ocrow the biomlids spokesperson N Your local clean water treamtmt plant or ger in touch with Chula Egigian-Nichols.BioSourcc Consulting 1197 Timbugatc Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680.9549. BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #6 : PATHOGENS WHAT ARE PATHOGENS? Pathogens are microorganisms that cause disease. Associated with sewage and biosolids, y pathogens of importance include bacteria, viruses,protozoa,and helminths. In a non- scientific context, pathogens are often called germs. They are very small organisms and are invisible to the unaided human eye. Bacteria are everywhere in our environment and life. Some bacteria are critically important to beneficial activities,some bacteria are neutral to humans, while some bacteria will cause human disease if a person is susceptible and comes in contact with a sufficient dose of the bacteria.A well known bacterium is Salmonella found with chickens. Viruses are distinctly different from other pathogens because they are unable to reproduce outside the living cell they infect although they will remain vindent for a time. Viruses are responsible for numerous human diseases including flu.Protozoa are sometimes found in drinking water,raw or under cooked food(especially pork),or on contaminated food preparation surfaces. Helminths are usually in the foam of tapeworms and roundworms,organisms frequently found in dogs, cats,and rats. WHERE DO PATHOGENS COME FROM? Pathogens live in all healthy and ill humans, domestic animals, livestock,and wildlife, essentially all warm-blooded mammals. The germs are cast off by mammals through feces.Human feces are collected in sanitary sewers or septic tanks for disinfection and destruction,most often at centralized sewage treatment plants. Other germs may enter the - treatment plant, lakes,streams, or groundwater through urban stormwater runoff. HOW ARE WE PROTECTED FROM PATHOGENS? Pathogenic microorganisms generally do not survive well outside of the body of their host. As a microscopic organism,their ideal environment matches that of the warm, Nprotected, fluid inside of a mammal. Gera are vulnerable and will die when exposed to disinfecting chemicals(e.g. acids or bleaches),heat, light, or dryness. Each germ has a unique response and survival time to these hostile conditions. ARE THERE PATHOGENS IN BIOSOLIDS? Yes. Biosolids are a product of the wastewater treatment process. One of the primary functions of wastewater treatment is to protect public health from potentially harmful germs.Many pathogens are destroyed during the collection and biological treatment of wastewater, and most of the remainder through the solids treatment process. It is important to note that pathogens cannot multiply outside of living hosts. For example,the ` AIDS virus is transferred only through intimate body contact with transfer of body fluids and the virus has never been found to survive the wastewater treatment process. HOW ARE BIOSOLIDS TREATED TO KILL PATHOGENS? The presence of pathogens in wastewater and the biosolids resulting from wastewater treatment requires treatment of these solids to reduce any remaining pathogens to a safe For fuller information about biosolids,contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water tremnent plant or get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols,BmoSource Consulting, 11971runbergate Lane,Brea,CA 92921 (714)680-9548. BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #6 : PATHOGENS DOES BIOSOLIDS CONTAIN CYCLOSPORA, THE INTESTINAL PARASITE FOUND RECENTLY ON FRESH FRUIT? According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cyclospom is a small intestinal parasite transmitted by the fecal-oral route. Outbreaks in developing countries appear to be associated with contaminated drinking water. Outbreaks in the United States are evidently associated with imported, contaminated fresh fruit. It is possible, although extremely unlikely, that biosolids contain cyclospora. Regulations prevent direct application of Class B biosolids to fresh fruits and vegetables, so in this case it is virtually certain that there could be no contamination. Class A biosolids, which contains virtually no measurable harmful organisms, may be applied to these types of crops. Because the biosolids are virtually free of germs it is expected that no cyclospom would be in the biosolids. Last revised 2.24-98 For funher information about biosolids.contact the biosolids spokesilctson at your local clean water uxuarnent plant or get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols.BioSource Consulting, 1197 Timbefgare Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548. BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #15: GROUNDWATER INFORMATION CAN BIOSOLIDS APPLIED TO LAND CONTAMINATE GROUNDWATER? Biosolids present no greater threat to groundwater than animal manures or commercial fertilizers, because biosolids are applied to land at rates that meet the fertilizer requirements of the crops to be grown. Over many decades thousands of acres of crop land have successfully received biosolids applications. in states where water quality monitoring wells are required, the water quality from these wells has always shown that when biosolids are used at agronomic rates following good agricultural practices,there is no degradation of groundwater quality attributable to biosolids. Studies show that when biosolids or fertilizer are properly applied and crops are harvested from the site, there is no increase in nitrate concentrations in the groundwater. El As with any agricultural product if applied incorrectly, the soluble constituents of biosolids have the potential to impact groundwater.The primary concern for groundwater quality associated with biosolids land application is with nitrates. Biosolids are normally IN applied at an agronomic rate, which means that the crop receives only the amount of nitrogen it can absorb. During the growing process,the crop takes up the nitrogen,thus N removing the nitrogen from the site when the crop is harvested.Only if more than the agronomic amount of biosolids is applied can there be excess nitrogen that eventually will be converted to nitrates, which can migrate to the groundwater. WILL THE METALS IN BIOSOLIDS POLLUTE THE GROUNDWATER? No.Extensive research over many years has found that trace metals are strongly adsorbed or held to the soil and organic matter added with biosolids and native to the soil. Except under very acidic conditions(pH<5.5) metals are tightly bound and are neither mobile for leaching to groundwater or soluble for uptake into plants. WILL PATHOGENS END UP IN OUR GROUNDWATER? No. Pathogens in biosolids are extremely unlikely to find their way into groundwater. During biosolids treatment,the concentration of pathogens is significantly reduced and bacterial levels are usually found to be less than those in manure. Researchers have found that the smallest pathogen, viruses,are very strongly bound to biosolids and are not easily released even after rainfall or irrigation. I� WILL BIOSOLIDS POLLUTE THE GROUNDWATER WITH TRACE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND PESTICIDES? No. Trace organic compounds are rarely found in biosolids prior to land application. Recent studies show that these organic compounds are highly volatile and are not present in biosolids or the soil long enough to be of concern for groundwater quality. For further information about biosolids.contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water trcmnent plant or get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols,BioSource Containing, 1197 Tunbergate lane,Brea,CA 92921 (714)680-9548. SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #15: GROUNDWATER INFORMATION ARE MONITORING WELLS NEEDED AT APPLICATION SITES? No. Research over the past 30-years including the use of lysimeters,shallow wells, and deep wells, have found that biosolids poses little risk to groundwater quality. It is not necessary to install wells as long as biosolids are applied at agronomic rates and the site is farmed following normal best management practices. HOW IS GROUNDWATER QUALITY PROTECTED FROM BIOSOLIDS? Groundwater buffers protect groundwater from direct contamination by biosolids. By applying at agronomic application rates and using biosolids with acceptable quality, the groundwater under the application site is protected from becoming contaminated by nitrate, pathogens, and trace metals. All wells provide a potential direct path to groundwater, and have similar buffer requirements regardless of how they are used (e.g., for irrigation or domestic water supply). A well that has been abandoned may provide a direct path to groundwater if it has a cracked or nonexistent well casing. Last revised 7-24-96 For further information about biosolids.contsm the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water trcaunem plant or get in touch with Charles Egigher-Nichols BioSource Consulting, 1197 Timbergam Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548. THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Technical Assistance Center and THE ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY Y2K and Compliance Legal and Technical Issues Workshop 8:00.8:15 am Check In 8:15-8:30 am Introduction to Seminar (Christensen) • Workshop Purpose and Structure • Introduction to District and Source Control Priorities 8:30-9:00 am Embedded Systems (Winters) 9:00-9:30 Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Tanouye) . State of California Update 9:30-9:45 am Break 9:45-10:45 am Technical and Legal Issues for the Manufacturing Community • Manufacturing Process and Waste Management • Legal Issues • New USEPA enforcement guidelines Local enforcement guidelines • Model Y2K Plans 10:45-11:15 am Orange County Sanitation District Y2K Plan (Thompson) 11:15-11:45 am Orange County Health Care Agency Y2K Plan (Kim) • Internal • External 11:45-12:00 noon Questions & Answers Orange County Sanitation District Technical Assistance Center 6Pre-Registration Required by March 31, 1999 and Orange County Seating is Limited Certified Unified Program Agency Priority will be given to Orange County Industries speakers include: Ann Tanouye Governor's Office of Presents: Emergency Services 5 g y "Y2K" (Year 2000) J. Craig Williams w What does it mean for your Daehnke& Cruz a business? d Henry G. Kohlmann > Thursday Arter& Hadden •� Q a y w April 8, 1999 u e U Orange County Sanitation District f Administration Building U td m 8:00 AM-12:00 PM U 2 (check-in 8:00-8:15) 0 N y Program Registration Information Registration Form Cost: FREE Pre-Registration is Required Seating is Limited to 90 Persons Seating Is limited. Please register as soon as possible Priority seating available for Orange County Industries. Name and Title: Come to the Workshop and learn: Send registration or call no later than March 31 1999. Organization: ♦ What is the Y2K problem? Fill out the attached form and mall to ♦ Y2K related issues for Process Kelly Christensen and Pretreatment Systems Orange County Sanitation District Address: y 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley,CA 92708 City: ♦ Legal issues/EPA updates or call(714)393-7430 to leave a menage Phone: ♦ Orange County Sanitation Zip Code: District Y2K Plan Location and Directions: Orange County Sanitation District Number of people attending: ♦ Orange County Health Care Administration Building Names of additional people attending: Agency/Environmental Health 10944 Ellis Avenue Y2K Plan Fountain Valley,CA 92709 Going South on the 405 freeway exit at Euclid, go straight through signal,enter main gate. For more information, please call: Going Noah on the 405 freeway exit at Euclid, turn Kelly Christensen right,immediately after underpass tom lea at signal, Orange County Sanitation District enter mans gate a Type of Industry(please specify) (714)593-7420 -or- g s Steve Kim 11 1 Orange County -mail this portion only to: Certified Unified Program Agency Kelly Christensen (714)667-3709 t ; aces Orange County Sanitation District are 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley,CA 92708 A H1UH WATER MARK'! Pagc I of t ty.{{ Community news _Dmeage _ � ®, �r}•��( "r*glftw.0 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH A HIGH WATER MARK? HOMEPAGE TODAY'S NEWS FLOOD CONTROL: Rep. Ron Packard's role on a AUTO OTIVE D.C. panel could help win funding for raising BUSINESS a FINANCE CLASSIFIED Prado Dam after years of delay. COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS March 3, 1999 •T Community m -come&caudrees;wnts By TERI SFORZA :ElT«el°° The Orange County Register •Rrewetoh Growth •Legal Une Ifs the time of year again when county officials head to -°o.c Tees Washington, D.C.,to paint a horrifying picture: •Pmm.a Gmmoimern •Register In Education Religion Wild water crashing down the Santa Ana River,enveloping DUCATIeah m, vast portions of north Orange County. Disneyland suddenly an EMPLOYMENT underwater theme park. Homes filled to the brim like fish ENTERTAINMENT& tanks. TRAVELFUN a GAMES HEALTH a FITNESS It's a picture that's been painted in the capital for years in LIBERTY ONLINELIVING&SHOPPING mostly futile attempts to secure federal money to raise the POLITICS& height of Prado Dam,which holds back the river at the county GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE line. But for the first time,local water officials have a friend in SCIENCE& high Paces.l TECHNOLOGY 6•• SERVICES a PROMOTIONS Rep. Ron Packard,R-Oceanside—whose district includes SPORTS &RECREATION WEATHparts of south county—is chairman of the House energy and water Appropriations subcommittee,which will weigh whether the Prado Dam project deserves money. "That,I think, is going to be very advantageous," said Ken Smith,deputy director and chief engineer of the county Public Facilities and Resources Department. Packard's spokesman stressed that no decisions have been made yet about what will be funded,or at what level. "But Mr. Packard is very aware of that situation" and will listen to Orange County's concerns,Adam Schwartz said. t Improvements to Prado are part of the$1.3 billion Santa Ana River Mainstem Project,authorized by Congress in 1986. About$600 million has been spent on lining the river and building the Seven Oaks Dam near Redlands.But the 75-mile improvement project is still not fully funded. Plans call for raising Prado Dam's embankment about 28 feet, httpJ/www.ocregister.conVcommunity/prado003w.shtznl 3/3/99 A HIGH WA I EX MAHK7 rage 1 of G in hopes of insulating Orange County from killer floods that are forecast to occur once every 190 years. The improvements planned for Prado would cost about$470 million. Officials hope to get at least$5 million from the federal government in this budget cycle. You can trace the project back to the Great Flood of 1938,a disaster that killed 45 people,left 2,000 homeless,and inflicted $14 million in damage. It happened March 3, when the Santa Ana River breached its banks after five days of heavy rain. In terms of human suffering, it was the worst weather disaster to hit the county this century,historians say.It led the federal government to build Pmdo Dam on the Santa Ana River near Corona in 1941, an action that has probably saved many lives. The most recent serious flood in the Santa Ana River flood plain occurred March 1, 1983, when the worst in a series of El Nino-fed storms brought torrential rains that inundated more than 900 homes in Huntington Beach. The damage toll that winter hit$25 million,including heavy damage to three municipal piers. In 1987,the county examined its flood-control network and determined that the channels need at least$1.2 billion in improvements. The Board of Supervisors flirted with the idea of floating bonds and creating special taxing districts to pay for the overhaul, but settled on a scaled-back approach. et newspaper In Omnge Cminty, oma ' 'Reg'isf�ei'' CopyrgM 198e TM Olanpe Cowry RepuM Phase sentl rommem4lo oveeular86nk.heeeom.wm httpJ/www.omgister.com/community/prado003w.shtml 3/3/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times ,r Sd �7YI?q � FOUNTAIN VALLEY President Clinton recommended $1.s million for the orange County Water and Orange County Sanitation districts' Groundwater Replenishment System m the budget he pro- posed Feb.1.The proposed pmt- fication system is expected to cost between $350 million and $400 mihiou and be completed by 2020. Environmental reviews are underway MA if approved the system could be eligible for cer- tification next month, water dis- trict spokesman Ron Wildermuth said. The system takes treated waste water that is normally re- leased into the ocean and purifies it beyond drinking-water stand- ards.The water is then introduced into the cdmty's underwater ba- sin,reducing the basin's salt level and improving overall water quality,Wddermuth said Officials expect the system to bring N enough water to serve 200A00 fam0ia fmagar. —Elsa LTiu, )l41%3-]1l1 WEDNDIDAA',JANUARY Ee. Illr Tax.Take, -. The frequency with which"lots Jut year THE WAMTIf -J0U:RRL: approved retaining,increasing or imposing. a to based on how the lax revenues Witte la bD used: ....S..._.....__..._.........�...___CA._EAS E_DYI.NCALIFORNIAUID 73% ECONOMIC FOCUS . Genual UrO S6 Municipalities Seek Ways """"""S'ements 28 Capital Improvements SO IC@% TZA Out of Tighter Tax Trap "'k`/Fl1 fe"lon 4b �21 'Sown:Peimata AnatbGt;. ' . By slu lu Mum propositlon 218 expanded to all titles a wide margin. Together, the two meal- 'Cities are more focused on redevelop sr.nurr"'•re•yrrie w.u.xw,xas.......... and counties a mandate requiring a IWO- sure$allowed the canary to use general meal and new sales-tax generation." In the 21 years since the adoption of (Irinis vote to impose or Increase "site- salts-lax motley for the special purpose For his flat[,John Slablback,national Proposition 17, local govemmenls and ciai" lazes, designated for a particular or fundingtransportaliml. director of UY Kenneth Leventhal Real anti-lax activists haveisshopped playing purpose,and a simple majority to pass or "It's either awful, wonderful or Estate Group's public-private develop a fiscal game of cal and mouse. Increase general taxes.Moreover.218 re- merely entertaining depending on how ment consulting practice, says that Proposition 13 slashed property-tax quired any lases implemented since Jail- you look at It,"says Mr.Misczynski.(Tile "Proposition 218 has not come up*explic- tales to 1%of assessed value and made it nary, 1005 without a vole go back to the county fendnl off a legal challenge of the illy as a motivation for[he 25 such deals virtually Impossible to ever false them. electorate(by Iasi November). measures by local taxpayer and political In Cxiirorria—worth nearly $e billion— prompting cities and counties Income rip According to the survey by Los Ange- groups, It wan as far as the stale trial his unit has put together since 1006. with a creative pastiche of fees, assess- les-based Kosmonl,tin nearly 200 city and Supreme Court,which In August let stand In all, lea says, (he Los Angeles-based merits and funding plans to slay afloat. county elections last year,voters agreed lower court rulings In favor of Ilse practice has done 60 public-prlva[e deals And when a particular slimtafy would to keep or increase existing taxes or take county.) worth about SB billion. cinch on, the anti-taxers—led by such on new ones about 16% of the [line. In Proposition 218 also has made local 'Still,San Leandro City Manager Jahn kTuups is lla flowed Jarvis Taxpayers 1!M7,final figure was 78%of the nearly 150 government move aggressive In parsu- Jennanis Indicates that these days. Assalallon Ohannl for Prapoxlllun ITSing ecuno liodevelupmenl deals. Mr. co-au(Imr)and[lie California Taxpayers I'ler(I0115%rIfVCYMI,IIIe$l0f WIIICII AlI1gI11 Kusmun( asserts. Officials are striking [here's evelopr pressure to lac this oco- Asmdntion—would respond Willi yet an- approval of existing tuxes. up more parinerzhips Willi private devel- androis investing$7ent ili tact. ug its other ballut Initiative aimed at choking 'Prupwiliun 218 Is severely curtailhlg opersorofferi^gulher incentives to bring andro is investing ST million through ILL ulf(he latest revenue s[remn. the ablllly of titles to raise revenues for in new businesses—usually retail—that redevelopment agency to help the owner Now. a suncy—sclieduled to be re- services." says lorry Kosnant. Intel- Will generate income for city and county of Eayfalr Mall renovate and expand it. Eventually,leased next week—Indicates Ihal the dent of Lite JIM that bears his name. coffers.Indeed.It's compounding one of Improvements s will ants estimates.onal Ilia anll-lax eats have the municipal mice on Even worse for cities and counties, propusition 17's consequences—art illcen- Improvmntnu annually mean un revenue. We tan In trying to avoid the latest Gov.Gray Davis has Indicated he will— (ive ror local governments to focus on m. That.lie annuatly In sales-tax w revenue. mousetrap: PropPsetou 218. Dubbed the at least fur noW—follow the example of tail dtve[opmtnl, as sales taxes are making he adds,still $9 a long the toward Might to Vole on Taxes Act by Its span- his predecessor.'Pell Wilson, and con- among tlm easier revenue sources to[all. unI v totip for me 5down0lea city lost %ors and adopted by Callrmnia voters in [tittle redirecting more Ilan$]billion an- The downside la this is that there may be sullen voters struck down a bminuas-Il- 1986.Proposition 218 made it tougher for nually I^property taxes Iron local gov- duo many retell establishments for an tense lax hiocase last year. hical govemmenls to raise or levy taxes. enintn[s to Schools. area to support. Ilockard ,says his city has limit mayorof assessments and flraperly-related fees. All tills has forted some local govern- Mr. Kosmanl's survey Identifies mu- Les A centiv,says his city has ereoffer ments to be more resourceful.Dealt Mis- ulci aillles Thal have Jane 10 or more rig t^ecalvas to manufacturers rater Since the mcasare ink effect. the uynskl, director or the Caliromla Ice- I uolnretailers,whidwfferartas Less tto- likelihool that voters would approve a public-private deals—^lost of past cal reds- nuriiitit stability. y search Burson, who has been tracking velopmentprojeciamle titpasscatemder nut LA, may be Ihd exception. lax has dropped ant-IIdN, according to Prolasillon 218-rclaltd court cases, or fiscal year:Alemnbro,Coroua.Culver Atlrlatl Ikinlia,a nsrarch fellow at the Kusmont L Associates Ine.'s annual sun points to Santa Clara County's effort 10 City, Garden Grove, Lancaster, Lang vey of the business taxes and other costs gel around the special-lazes vote. Beach, Us Angeles, Ontario, Pomona, San of Calmbasad Public Policy lnsn- In 190 cities and unincorporated areas. fly the required majority vote.Santa Riverside County, San Francisco, San stud at reinforces nf roes "ta. says the Kosmonl Clam County voters approved a general Ldalldro,Vallejo and Ventura. shady cities 'most "tic ped for wisdom l balf-cent soles-tax Increase. A separate -cities have become so handcuffed I^ revrealnuea are strapped forty to" base ballot proposal gave voters (Ira OPPortu- tea way they tail generate local taxes to planning era d zoning most lions on base ,,try to vole on whether the new revenue raise revenue for services,they hove be. Plmndng and zoning doci$IaLL an their cash value In the municipal treasury, should be usedfor T1,11 as apt of proved y cone development ays Mr. Offering rather (hall na such rplmnieral judg- liarta[ion projects.Thal was approved by more concessions," says Me ICosmonL un.n[s.%"nuahro of lift." Kern weighs solids data Page 1 of 2 I For a good tune, click here. local news TrVl hrrstielb Cilifominn Kern weighs solids data Filed: Febnrary 22, 1999 By STEVEN MAYER Californian staff writer e-mail: smarerfa�bakercld.com County supervisors asked for the latest scientific information regarding the agricultural use of treated sewage sludge, and they got it Monday— in shovelfuls. With terms such as "frequency distributions," "mineralization coefficients" and "anaerobic digestion" being casually tossed around, supervisors listened and asked questions as scientists representing both proponents and opponents of sludge argued their respective cases. Kern County farmer and biosolids proponent Bill Tracy summed up the order of the day when he told the board, "Your job today is to separate biosolids from B.S." As more than 100 farmers, scientists and other interested people watched and listened from the audience, sludge opponents began the scientific word duel by calling in Dave Bouldin, a soil chemist from Cornell University. Bouldin is the co-author of"Cause for Caution," a research study that outlines the dangers of heavy metals, organic chemicals and biological pathogens present in biosolids. "I think we all can agree that we need to protect soil production, water resources and consumer confidence," Bouldin said. 'But what is acceptable data?" Bouldin criticized the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations governing the use of sewage sludge on crops. He said the "503 Regulations" attempt to apply a single standard to "all soils, all climates, all crops and all sludge." Proponents of biosolids had their own lineup of heavy-hitters Monday, including University of Arizona microbiologist Chuck Gerba. http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1292405325.asp 2/24/99 Kent weighs solids data Page 2 of 2 "In our study, viruses and salmonella were not detected in soils within 24 to 48 hours after application," Gerba testified. There also is no credible evidence that harmful organisms in sludge leach down to underground water sources, even after five years of land application, Gerba added. The use of sludge biosolids imported from sewage treatment plants in Southern California has become a divisive issue among farmers—and city dwellers— in Kern County. Kern's close proximity to sewage facilities in Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura and Santa Barbara counties makes this region an attractive destination for millions of tons of sludge generated each year in those areas. Monday's meeting was the latest step in the county's attempt to craft an ordinance that will govern the use of the controversial human and industrial waste byproduct. But the local effort has stretched well into its second year as farmers, local citizens and government officials continue to struggle with conflicting scientific information about the benefits and dangers of sludge use. After four hours of listening to more information Monday, there was no indication from supervisors they had reached a turning point. The county will use the information gathered Monday to develop a draft of a permanent ordinance, said Kern County Resource Management Agency director David Price. The next meeting of the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee will be March 25 at the county's public services building on M Street. 0 ® O Wa D ktoby Mmw a C.MgM 1WTha9ak,nWtC so,no IE.HMe Wab4 ,Va Aafo,I,W Preis C"wd,bi nadce I Prh v Paliw Swt,m l http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1292405325.asp 2/24/99 AV Press:Kern County Sludge Page 1 of 4 it Sludge battle rages M.Xo rsr Jump lines This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press February 23, 1999. M NM By MICHAEL BITTON Pine�� The VaRev Prvst Valley Vall Press Staff Writer BAKERSFIELD -Kern Countys Board of Supervisors will have to decide which camp of scientists it trusts when it decides whether to ban the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer on agricultural land. Scientists in support of the use of sludge told the board Monday they've Nina never heard of one documented case where sludge,used according to federal Newsroom EPA guidelines, has harmed the environment or made anyone sick. LAW football More scientists, retained by growers opposed to the use of human waste on Nobs`'pass cropland, said more research is needed before anyone can responsibly deem Qlatuan the practice safe. Poouvoaee Sowial reports AV Courthouse; Each side got an hour to present its side of the story,followed by half-hour Edwards/8elin rebuttals. Public comment on sludge has been common at past board Palmdale airoon meetings, but Mondays gathering was dedicated to scientific testimony. School survey Six ith David Price, director of the Kern County Resource Management Agency, Starr tenon said the board has until January 2000 to enact a new ordinance regarding the Weather use of biosolids in the county. 1"9 Review Ads When a proposed ordinance is ready, it will go through a public hearing Classified index process before final approval, Price said. Announcements Choice Etrcmmters Experts opposed to the use of sludge included David R. Bouldin, professor Empin f emeritus from Cornell Universitys Waste Management Institute in Ithaca, Farm. 'ante•oe1s N.Y.; and Aaron B. Margolin, an associate professor of microbiology at the Financial University of New Hampshire. Obituary notices Personal They spoke on behalf of the Kern Food Growers Against Sludge, a group of Real estate sales IS farmers, which includes members from the Antelope Valley. Rentals Placing a iing ads narion Bouldin, who said he has 20 years of experience studying sludge, said , lC asked supporters and opponents alike want to protect soil productivity and water Remil display resources, and at the same time maintain consumer confidence. Do 1're The controversy of using sludge,or"biosolids," comes down to the Directories Auto Dealers associated risks,Bouldin said. Rome Sind Local Web sites He said he finds existing research too narrow to determine whether sludge has a detrimental effect on crops. Some data exists regarding corn,beans and Past fssum alfalfa, he said, but little more is known. That data shows potential damage Suodew http://www.avpress.com/n/tusty3.hts 2/24/99 AV Press: Kern County Sludge Page 2 of 4 Monday to crops when sludge contains too much zinc and nitrogen, he said. Tuesday Wednesday "In my opinion, only more research will resolve this controversy," Bouldin Thum said. Friday Sanrrday Margolin, testifying live from New Hampshire via a teleconference call, also Search spoke of the risks of using sludge in agricultural areas. Classified ads Mach Butters He said there is a big difference between a calculated risk, or a decision News Paees based on data, and a perceived risk, or a decision based on emotion. '9&'98 review lethawk stories Valley Press into "When you start telling people thew food may or may not have come in contact with human feces, that it may or may not have contained pathogens, The Valley Press that will be perceived negatively," Margolin said. "People are looking for About avpress.com more of a guarantee." avoress.com FAO About the Pacer p ct us Three experts who said spreading sludge on farmland is safe were introduced Jobs with us by lames F. Stahl, assistant general manager of Los Angeles County's Subscribine Sanitation Districts. L.A. County's Sanitation Districts, the city of Los Super Coups of Ay Angeles and Orange County truck about 80,000 tons of sewage sludge to Top of this paec Kern County, Stahl said. -- - -Y, Chuck Gerba, a professor of microbiology and environmental science at the p The Wst+ University of Arizona's College of Agriculture, said biosolids have been } we to sue recycled near Tucson, in Pima County, for the past 10 years without a• o Y desen! problem. The material was spread on cotton fields, and the effect was immediate and positive, Gerba said. Heavy metals haven't been a problem in Pima County's sludge fields because there is little if any industrial waste in the county's sewer system, Gerba said. Pathogens haven't been a problem because they can't survive in the hot desert climate. "They'd rather be in your colon than out there," he told the board. "It's a harsh environment." Gerba said during five years of searching for viruses, he hasn't found any in Pima County's fields where biosolids are used. "We have been unable to find any evidence of problems," Gerba said. "We've tried our damnedest." ` Rufus L. Chaney, a research agronomist with the Environmental Chemistry Lab at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center USDA, said, 'There are so many safety factors I'm embarrassed to admit them," Chaney said. "There are so many, we could be sued for being too careful." Chaney said with the quality of biosolids presently available, there is no reason to be concerned about using sludge on cropland, because most of the metals and minerals are removed in a treatment process. http://www.avpress.conVn/tusty3.hts 2/24/99 AV Press: Kern County Sludge Page 3 of 4 Alan B. Rubin, a senior scientist from the EPA's Office of Science and Technology, also spoke in favor of using biosofids on farm land. He said the EPA began to shape rules regarding biosolids, known as the 503 Regulations, in 1984. By 1993, the rules were published. When supervisors asked Rubin if the 503 rules could be applied universally to all 50 states, he said yes. Rubin said when the rules were being drawn up, 350 organic chemicals were targeted. Eighty percent of them have not been detected in sludge, and of the 70 that were,40 were deemed of human origin. That leaves 30 to watch out for, he said. "I truly believe the 503 rule protects human health," Ruben said. "We have never received a documented and or peer-reviewed health case attributed to the use of biosolids." Rubin urged supervisors not to ban the use of biosolids on Kern County land. "We have data to show it's not only safe when used appropriately;it makes sense,"Rubin said. But the use of sludge on cropland hasn't made sense in other California counties. Among the counties that have banned the spreading of sewage sludge are Stanislaus, San Joaquin and Sutter, opponents said. Risks to land, air, water, human and animal health were reasons for the bans, as was the possible loss of confidence in agricultural products from those areas. But Buttonwillow,rancher Bill Tracy said he's not afraid of biosolids. He's been having them applied to his land at the Buttonwillow Land and Cattle Co. for the past four years. " We don't use it as a nutrient, but apply it to ground the Indians didn't even want," Tracy said. "In the past 30 years we've tried every type of snake oil to get the ground to produce. This worked." Tracy said his family shared the same concerns as the biosolids opponents about five years ago. t "We investigated it fully," he said. "We educated ourselves." Tracy urged supervisors to separate biosolids from B.S., and allow the use of biosolids as fertilizer on crops that aren't for human consumption. Tuesday news page News pa Valley Press home page http://www.avpress.com/rx/tusty3.hts 2124/99 City to buy land used for biosolids Page 1 of 4 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:04 PM To: EMT Subject: FW; City to buy land used for biosolids (http://www.bakemfield.com/top/i--12928398 Don at. al. I had the impression from some of our consultants up in KC that there was going to be a deal between LA City and Bakersfield that would allow biosolids and reclaimed water disposal to exist side-by-side on this property and that a peace agreement was underway. Well............ This news piece says just the opposite. Blake ----Original Message----- From: Michael Turnipseed Irnailto:m.t=ipsecd@cwix.coml Sent:Thursday. February 18, 1999 6:17 AM To: Steckler,Steve; Stahl,Jim: Rubin, Alan:O'Delte, Bob;Mike Moom: Kcamey, Ray:Hill, Penny; Gerba. Chuck: Ron Bnzweiler;Baroldi, Layne: Anderson, Blake Subject: City to buy land used for biosolids(http://www.bakenFiield.mMtop/i-12928398 • • . • ��� try me VON '-' . 0) `�" afully searchable dlwitory news Mir Alakrralidt;lCalilomian -hem. City to buy land used for biosolids Filed: February 17, 1999 By MARC BENJAMIN Californian staff writer e-mail: mbeniamin@bakersfield.com The city of Bakersfield's pending purchase of 4,700 5ee acres near Interstate 5 and Highway 119 will deprive rent the city of Los Angeles of a dumping site for its jpaPhidR biosolids. The $8.5 million deal, between the city and Valley Communities Inc. of Bakersfield, may close escrow as early as this week, city officials say. The property is south and west of Interstate 5 and Highway 119. 2/19/99 City to buy land used for biosolids Page 2 of 4 'We really don't want somebody else's problem," said Raul Rojas, Bakersfield's public works director, referring to Los Angeles transporting its biosolids to the same property. The city will honor the contract between Valley Communities and Los Angeles which expires in September, but has no plans to extend the agreement. To accept Los Angeles biosolids—heat-treated human and industrial waste products—would require action by the Bakersfield City Council and members of city staff say council members have indicated no interest in striking such a deal. "The purchase will allow us to control our costs and control our own destiny because we have to have a place to dump our effluent," Rojas said. Gregory Klimko, Bakersfield's finance director, said the deal makes sense for the city, which can recoup money paid for the property within about 20 years. The city currently pays $27 per acre foot—about $275,000 per year—to Valley Communities to use the effluent (treated sewage water). By acquiring the property, the city can lease the property for farming non-edible crops, such as cotton, alfalfa and barley. It's the same process used for treated sewer water comingfrom the other city sewer plant in southeast Bakersfield. Klimko estimates the city can earn $225,000 by leasing land for farming and save $275,000 it pays for water to be piped to the sewer farm. The water is piped from the sewer plant at Gosford Road and Taft Highway, about nine miles away, said Gene Bogart, Bakersfield's water resources manager. "it has been the policy of the city to take care of its own material locally. We haven't accepted anything from the outside, Bogart said. The change in property ownership will force Los Angeles to find a , new home for its biosolids, but Kern County still could be the disposal location. Raymond Kearney, head of regulatory affairs for the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation, said Los Angeles also sends biosolids to San Joaquin Composting's facility near Lost Hills and to Riverside County. 2119/99 City to buy land used for biosolids Page 3 of 4 Judy Wilson, director of the Los Angeles County Bureau of Sanitation, said the agency has spoken with two other Kern County firms that already have permits for biosolids application on their properties and a third firm in Riverside County. "We always continue to look at other solutions," Wilson said. "We want to have a diverse number of contractors and you need a variety of options because of weather conditions ... if we can't get to Kern County over the Grapevine then we can go to Riverside and vice versa." But any new property acquired for biosolids operations may take some time to establish. Kern County has placed a moratorium on permitting additional biosolids applications until a new ordinance is approved. David Price, Kern County's resource management agency director, said a new ordinance is several months away from being considered. About 25,000 acres in Kern County have been fertilized with biosolids, said Steve McCalley, Kern County Environmental Health Department director. Steve Stockton of Responsible Biosolids Management in Santa Barbara said the loss of the Highway 119 property will not affect Southern California agencies' ability to transport and apply biosolids. Stockton, who was raised in a Kern County farming family, said the biosolids produced in Orange and Los Angeles counties are among the cleanest available. Stockton's company also ships biosolids from Oxnard's city sewage plant on property the city owns near Lost Hills. "What's funny is we operated out there for the better part of four years before anybody realized we were there," Stockton said of his firm's biosolids applications for Oxnard. "Now, we find ourselves in a fight just to save our lives." But, he maintains western Kern County is one of the better areas , for biosolids application. "On the west side we have the kind of agriculture that can really benefit from it and bad soil that needs to be remediated," he said. 2/19/99 City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 1 of 3 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake— - -- - - - - --- Sent: Monday, March 15, 1999 9:44 AM To: EMT Subject: FW: City sues to enforce sewer land buy (http://www.bakemfield.wmAop/i--12908508 This is the property that is currently utilized by Responsible Biosolids Management (RBM)to handle a portion of LA City's biosolids. We understand, from Judy Wilson, that she believes that the City of Bakersfield IS prepared to enter into a long tens relationship with Los Angeles(including LA subsequently buying the land from Bakersfield and then providing perpetual access to Bakersfield to dispose of its effluent) after Bakersfield buys the land. This is contrary to the Bakersfield Californian's news accounts that Bakersfield intends to NOT extend the RBM/LA City use of the property beyond the existing October 1999 contract. The one thing I've learned about Kern County is there's always at least two versions of every story that we hear. Blake ---Original Mcssage— From: Michael Tumipseed limilto:rn.tumipseed(et.cwis.wml Sent: Saturday.March 13. 1999 8:13 AM To:Jim Willett:Tracy' Bill:Tacked. Gene:Stockton,Steve:Stahl.Jim:Sanden. Blake:Rubin.Alan:O'Deue,Bob: Mike Marrc:Kearnev,Rav:Pcnnv Hill:Gcrbi. Chuck: Ron Enz. ilm Robert Dowdv:Baroldi. Layne: Anderson. Blake Subject: City sues to enforce s vcr land buy(btip://nvvw.bakcrsficld.wm/top/i--12908509 Ea5 yruo=ys _ rn _ J Kill m Co.mry. 11e111 1:44W,,sbrlt,C'dformm -h .. City sues to enforce sewer land buy Filed: March 12, 1999 By MICHAEL S. GREEN Californian staff writer et ail: mcime@Oakersf'mld.com r The city of Bakersfield filed suit Friday against a Kern County firm for allegedly reneging on an $8.5 million deal to purchase waste- disposal property at Interstate 5 and Taft Highway. City Attorney Bart Thiltgen said a hearing is scheduled Monday on whether the city should be granted a temporary restraining order barring Valley Communities Inc. from backing out of its 3/16/99 City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 2 of 3 January contract to sell 4,700 acres of land to the city. Treated sewage from Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 on Ashe Road is piped eight miles west to the sewer farm, where the "biosolids" are incorporated into the soil. The Bakersfield City Council voted 7-0 Thursday night in a special closed session to sue VCI unless it complied with the contract terms by noon Friday. The suit was filed Friday afternoon when the company did not respond, Thiltgen said. A March 4 letter from VCI President James Trigueiro said the company had received an "unsolicited proposal"to buy the land for"a purchase price significantly greater than that contained in the city of Bakersfield offer." The city views the "offer" as a binding contract, Thiltgen said, and is claiming anticipatory breach of contract, negligence and conspiracy among other causes of action. Trigueiro and VCI's attorney could not be reached Friday for comment. Thiltgen said the city asked VCI who made the higher bid but the company failed to respond. A Wednesday meeting between the parties failed to resolve the dispute. One possibility is Responsible Biosolids Management, which delivers Los Angeles biosolids to the same property. One condition of the city's deal was that RBM's contract not be renewed in September. The city of Los Angeles did not ask RBM to make a bid, Los Angeles sanitation director Judy Wilson told The Californian. Bakersfield city officials questioned her about the new proposal, too. "I would sure like to see it in continued use for biosolids, but we are not in any position to acquire real property,"Wilson said, adding she wouldn't be surprised if RBM made VCI an offer. "They told me they were concerned about losing the site and that they would take steps, but I wasn't sure they were in a position to pay for it." RBM officials could not be reached for comment Friday. In addition to the temporary restraining order, the city of Bakersfield is seeking a permanent injunction and court order to force VCI to comply with the contract. The lawsuit also will be amended to seek punitive damages from the bidder once that 3/16199 City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 3 of 3 entity's identity is revealed, Thiltgen said. ® A O w.c a kmrep no,.re C pyfli*N>IM.1M Bsk Md LafEemien I E.H Me rlsseceletl Preis CowrieM NMi I PrNaw Pjg c WermM 3/16/99 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 1 of 6 News �;� Slte Index - ao ■:•IA'II.^ !�,II STATE & LOCAL HELP✓ c IICY nrre ®' SOUTHERN CALIFORNU510RSOURCE:" Monday, March 15, 1999 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says . Health: Fetuses and young children in farm areas are at highest risk, research suggests, with intelligence, motor skills and personalities affected. By MARLA CONE, Times Environmental Writer children exposed to pesticides in the womb or at an __;early age may suffer permanent brain defects that could change their lives by altering their behavior and their ability to do everything from drawing a picture to catching a ADVERTISEMENT ball, according to new scientific research. Widely used pest-killing chemicals, in amounts routinely found in the environment in farm areas, seem to be capable of skewing thyroid hormones, which control how the brain of a fetus or young child develops, according to a study published today. Scientists say the study and other recent research support an emerging theory that pesticides may exact a toll on the intelligence, motor skills and personalities of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. "Data suggest that we may be raising a generation of children with learning disabilities and hyper-aggression," said Wayne Porter, a University of Wisconsin professor of zoology and environmental toxicology. Porter's study, published today in the journal Toxicology and Industrial Health, shows that a common mix of insecticide, herbicide and fertilizer found in drinking water altered the thyroid hormones of young mice. It also changed their aggressiveness--measured by attacks on other mice—and suppressed their immune systems. Although a study of mice alone is not overly compelling, the theory is bolstered by recent research on human beings. In tests in the state of Sonora, Mexico, scientists found striking differences in hand-eye coordination and other mental and physical skills when comparing Yaqui Indian preschoolers in an agrarian region with those in adjacent foothills where no pesticides are used. Four- and 5-year-olds living in the farm valley had trouble performing a variety of simple motor skills—drawing stick http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaaOO1 U7edl3f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=l 3/15/99 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 2 of 6 ; figures, catching a 12-inch ball from almost four yards away and a tennis ball from more than a yard away, and dropping raisins into a bottle cap from a distance of six inches. They also had poorer memory skills and stamina, were more prone to physical aggression and angry outbursts, and were less sociable and creative while playing. Farm and household pest-killers are widely used there, and high levels of multiple pesticides have been found in the cord blood of newborns and the breast milk of mothers in the area. Mother study, in rural western Minnesota, found increased birth defects in children conceived during the spring growing season. Most of the new research detects problems in agricultural communities—places found not just in rural regions but also in more urbanized areas, including Southern California. No one knows yet what it might mean for people who consume small traces of the chemicals in their food. Earlier this month, Consumers Union reported that many fruits and vegetables contain concentrations of pesticides that may be unhealthful for children. The new hormone studies add to a growing body of research from around the world suggesting that dozens of commonly used pesticides and other chemicals mimic the hormones that control sexual and neurological development. Called endocrine disruption, this is arguably the most controversial environmental issue of the past decade. From alligators in Florida to polar bears in the Arctic, wild animals in pollution hot spots have been feminized by hormone-disrupting chemicals that imitate estrogen or block testosterone, scientists say. But the impact on human beings—who generally are exposed to much lower levels of pollution—is more controversial and uncertain. In addition to the possible neurological effects, some researchers theorize that the hormone disrupters could be reducing men's sperm counts or increasing diseases of the reproductive system. Pesticide company representatives—and some toxicologists and other scientists—remain skeptical that commonly found levels of pesticides can alter human thyroid and sex hormones. "I'm kind of dubious that low-level exposures to chemicals are raising all kinds of havoc with the endocrine system," said John McCarthy, vice president of a group representing pesticide manufacturers, the American Crop Protection Assn- "The human system has so many protective mechanisms, and our bodies are bombarded with all kinds http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 3 of 6 of things." Still, he said, the industry is highly concerned about the findings suggesting neurological damage, and would like to see a comprehensive review to evaluate all existing studies and figure out what they collectively show. "We ought to be taking a very hard look at it," McCarthy said. 'There's almost a study a week of one type or another, and it's hard to see how it all fits together. We have to take some time to say, 'OK, what does this all mean? Is this something that should require some abrupt change [in pesticides] or fine-tuning or more research?"' No one knows how many pesticides out of 77,000 used in the United States might alter sex or thyroid hormones. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires tests that screen pesticides for cancer and birth defects--but not for hormone effects. A committee last year devised new testing requirements—supported by the pesticide industry-- that are expected to take effect in 2001. It has long been suspected that various environmental pollutants can damage brain development. Industrial compounds called PCBs have been linked to learning disabilities in children of women who ate contaminated Great Lakes fish. The link to pesticides is far from definitive, however, and big gaps in knowledge remain. Questions abound: How do the contaminants disrupt thyroid levels? What does that physically do to the brain?What dose of exposure does it take? Does the human body have some defense mechanism to fend off low levels of hormones? What do mixes of various man-made and natural hormones do to people? Some scientists suspect that the damage is passed from a mother to her unborn child early in the first trimester, before most women even know they are pregnant. Thyroid hormones guide the nerve cells that dictate how the brain of a fetus develops and the number of brain cells created. One theory is that if a mother receives a dose of pesticides during this critical phase, it can interfere with her thyroid levels—sometimes raising them, sometimes lowering them—irreversibly altering the child's nervous system. How the child's brain circuitry develops determines his or her hand-eye coordination, motor skills and learning ability. Thyroid hormones also can change behavior—an excess can make people quick to anger, while a low count could have the opposite effect. The hormones also can alter steroids that control aggression and immune systems. 'Thyroid hormones are important to brain development, and that's been known for a long time," said Dr. Harley http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 4 of 6 , Komblum, a pediatric neurologist at the UCLA Medical Center. But, he and other neurologists say, it's debatable how important the mother's thyroid level is to the fetus, and it's even more uncertain what role environmental contaminants may play. Porter said children up to age 8 who have developing brains and immune systems are "especially vulnerable"to changes in thyroid hormones. Some symptoms of children exposed to pesticides are similar to attention deficit hyperactivity disorders, which have been increasingly diagnosed in American children. Some medical research supports a link between thyroid hormones and those disorders, but the connection, especially with pesticides, remains unclear. The implication for adults, and whether pesticides might cause thyroid disorders, also is unknown. In the study of 50 Mexican children, the scientists, led by anthropologist Elizabeth Guillette of the University of Arizona, said genetic and social factors—including income, education and health services—are so similar between the farm valley and the foothills that they cannot explain the differences in the youngsters' cognitive ability. "These children share similar genetic background, diets, water mineral contents, cultural patterns and social behaviors. The major difference was their exposure to pesticides," Guillette and Mexican researchers said in a report published in June in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. Most of the stick-figure drawings by the 4- and 5-year-olds in the farm valley were unrecognizable as human beings— they look like the scribbles of a 2-year-old. In contrast, drawings by the foothill children had heads, eyes, torsos, arms and legs. Experts say that the inability to draw a person indicates a breakdown between the brain's ability to process visual information and its ability to control fine muscles. "Some valley mothers stressed their own frustration in trying to teach their child how to draw. In addition, two valley children drew pictures composed of boxes, arches and lines, claiming these pictures were people," the researchers reported. Other tests pointed to recollection and stamina problems. One foothill child could jump for 336 seconds—over three times longer than the best-performing valley child. Some scientists remain dubious of the results because the tests on the children were unusual, and are intrinsically subjective and difficult to interpret. Dr. Richard Jackson, director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the federal Centers for Disease http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7edl3f8&NS-docoffset=22&NS-adv-search=l 3/15/99 Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 5 of 6 Control and Prevention, said his staff was "unimpressed by the scientific rigor" of the work in the report. McCarthy said that although the differences between the two populations of children seem striking, other hidden factors, rather than pesticide exposure, cannot be ruled out. Other studies, meanwhile, show that pesticide exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy increases birth defects. The University of Minnesota and the federal EPA in a 1996 study found a high rate of birth defects in the children of Minnesotans who work as pesticide appliers as well as the general population of western Minnesota, a major farm region with heavy pesticide use. The defect rate was the highest among babies born nine months after the spring season, indicating that the risk rises for children conceived during the time when pesticide use increases. In Porter's 5-year study of mice, the animals drank water containing a mixture of two pesticides—aldicarb and atrazine—and nitrates from fertilizer. The concentrations ingested by the mice were similar to those found in ground water in many agricultural areas, Porter said. Aldicarb, atrazine and nitrates are the three most abundant agricultural contaminants in the United States, although they do not rank high in use in California. While the mix of the three chemicals altered the mice hormones, each one alone did not. That points out a gaping hole in the federal effort to protect consumers—the EPA only tests for effects of pesticides individually, not cumulatively. The EPA tests, Porter said, "generate a great deal of false confidence in the safety" of pesticides. Drawing an Unsettling Picture Scientists say children may suffer permanent brain defects from pesticide exposure. In Sonora, Mexico, a study found that Yaqui Indian preschoolers in a farming region exhibited poor motor skills compared with their counterparts in adjacent foothills where no pesticides are used. When asked to draw a person, the farm valley's 4- and 5-year-olds mostly drew meaningless circles and lines. Source: Environmental Health Perspectives, June 1998. CoovdaM 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99 wry moves to annex botsa unica Page I of 1 community news ItIonte Page ;- m, DCMOI tar.CDM THE ORANGE matrry REGtnm I Nes .T--WARCH City moves to annex Bolsa Chica HOME PAGE TODAY'S NEWS DEVELOPMENT: Huntington Beach says the A`RUTOMonvE 1,600 acres could bring millions in tax revenue. BUSINESSa FINANCE CLASSIFIED COLUMNS February 23, 1999 COMMUNNY NEWS Z OommuNty Everts By OLIVIA HAWKINSON SmReacem s The Orange County Register ; TM •R.w HUNTINGTON BEACH—The city may be primed for a -G Ian growth spurt. 'Ma= O.C.Temm -Posh a Govemmem The City Council voted 5-2 Monday night to start talks to ,,gM In Edu n annex 1,600 acres of the Bolsa Chica wetlands and bluffs •SpedN FeaWles EDUCATION along Pacific Coast Highway, EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAINMENT 3 Councilwoman Shirley Dettloff,chairwoman of the Bolsa FUAN&GAMES Chica subcommittee,said, "This is an area that we surround. HEALTH a FITNESS It's a verycritical area to this city. The residents want this city LIBERTY ONLINE ty ty LIVING It SHOPPING to have more of a role in Bolsa Chica." POLITICS a GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE The council acted to start the annexation process—one that SCIENCE a could take three years for completion—before builder TEC NOLOG8 Y Hearthside Homes breaks ground on a planned 1,200 homes on PROMOTIONS the Bolsa Chica mesa. SPORTS a RECREATION WEATHER Members of environmental groups such as the Bolsa Chica Land Trust condemned the plan and accused city leaders of keeping their eyes fixed on dollar signs.Council members said they saw development as inevitable,and that through annexation,the city could capture millions in taxes that would otherwise go to the county. Hearthside's plans depend on Coastal Commission approval, completion of a water pipeline from Cypress and pending lawsuits between the company and the land trust. Perhaps(council members)convinced themselves 1,000 homes out there isn't so bad,"trust member Connie Boardman said. "I'm real disappointed." newspaper In reuse . ..fie . CopRiaM 1aBD The Onlge Count/Rea4ter Please xM mnvnanq b oveolete eM.heeCom.cam httpJ/www.ocregister.com/community/bolsaO23w.shtml 2/23/99 Supervsors Back Coastal Coalition Plan Page I or t ews H co F, e 7, Y / ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP shop your new home online_I 14"IIm,�Net'""rYs"m � t�oatltaals �Y� � ;'� Wednesday, C Nary 24, 1999 Supervisors Back Coastal Coalition Plan .Environment: The panel would unite city, county and state officials in fighting beach erosion in O.C. By DAVID REYES, Timer StaBWrilo he Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously RELATED endorsed formation of a coastal coalition to help combat o.c. ECTI N beach erosion along Orange County's 42-mile shoreline.The coalition,proposed by Supervisor Tom Wilson,would NEWS BY provide a"united front"with all six coastal cities,the county COMMUNITY and state to lobby for passage of legislation such as Assembly Bill 64,written by Assemblywoman Denise Ducheny(D-San SPORTS Diego). PREP SPORTS Ducheny's bill,which this week won the endorsement of the San Clemente City Council,calls for a statewide program to BUSINESS restore California beaches. "We're trying to coalesce coastal cities and recognize we all LIFE&STYLE have a problem and that AB 64 is one of the tools," Wilson CALENDAR said. "We need a galvanized group." Tide pools and beaches need to be preserved,Wilson said, CALENDAR and water quality should be top priority for swimmers and WEEKEND surfers. HOME DESIGN The group,dubbed the Orange County Coastal Coalition, would comprise elected officials from Seal Beach,Huntington COMMENTARY Beach,Newport Beach,Laguna Beach,Dana Point and San Clemente; Wilson and fellow Supervisor Jim Silva;and a state T.V.TIMES parks representative. In the short term,Wilson said,the coalition would lobby for passage of Ducheny's bill and"show the federal government" that Orange County is united on the issue of coastal preservation. ADVti"StuEW The concept already has support from the cities. In a telephone interview,Huntington Beach administrator psi" Ray Silver said his city "is really excited" about he helps proposal. "I think it's a great effort We need all the help we can � get1. Huntington Beach has had a severe problem with erosion, especially with the bluffs north of Golden West Street The city fenced off part of the area after the crumbling bluffs undermined a coastal path popular for biking,nulnin9 and walking. " ♦J — Coincidentally, Mayor Peter M. Green and Councilwoman rowaeam a.nw a Shirley S. Dettloff are in Washington,D.C.,this week lobbying .rY' for federal help to shore up the bluffs,Silver said. http://www.iadmes.comtHomFINEWStORANGE/OCNEWS/t000017153.htn'd 224/99 nuuuugwu rviuves w n =nova t.mca we, anns,mesa rage c oe 1997,when the state bought 880 acres of the marsh. But environmentalists contend that building homes on the mesa above would damage the ecosystem that supports the wetlands, �-r-% v undermining all previous preservation efforts. Si Voting against annexation were council members Tom Harman and Dave Sullivan, both of whom expressed serious �) reservations about any development of the area n, .. "What they must have for development is Huntington Beach water;' Sullivan said. "1f they want Huntington Beach's water, I suggest that they walk to the end of our pier and jump in." The council has wrestled with the issue for years,and many city officials remain opposed to any development on the grasslands along Warner Avenue near Pacific Coast Highway. But Hearthside has a binding agreement with Orange County to build 1,235 homes there,and the state's annexation laws mandate that the city accept that deal. With annexation would come leverage for the city,however, because it would be providing water for the new homes. The alternative would be for Hearthside and Southern California Water Co.to build a$13-million,six-mile water pipeline from Cypress. The negotiations also could lead to some compromises such as a wider buffer around the wetlands, fewer homes and more park space. Some council members and environmentalists still hope the bluff-top acreage can be purchased and preserved by the state or federal government,even given the$135 million that the city estimates the property to be worth. But that is a pipe dream,said Lucy Dunn, Hearthside executive vice president.The development company,which originally envisioned building 6,000 homes and a marina on the wetlands,has no interest in selling. The environment would be best served by allowing Hearthside to build the houses and, at the same time,improve the wetlands area,which is a sanctuary for birds,she said. Part of The City? Huntington Beach officials heard from environmentalists and other residents Monday on whether to begin the process of annexing 200 acres above the Bolsa Chica wetlands. Copyright 1999 Los Angela Times.All Rights Reserved b Samch the archives of the Los Angela Times for similar stories about BOLSA CHICA WETLANDS ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY Ht1NTINGTON BEACH(CAl—ANNEXATION . RANGE C DEVELUPM ' TIAND EVEDhE WPMEN 1.You coil net be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. e:wS G� I a n ex GO http://www.latimcs.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000016833.htad 2/23/99 rrow nolsa L mca ueoate ueveropea over years rage r or as ome age m, community news iL OCII091d .001111 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH How Bolsa Chica debate developed HOME PAGE over years TODArS NEWS ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE February 23, 1999 BUSINESS&FINANCE CLASSIFIED COLUMNS By OLIVIA HAWKINSON COMMUNITY NEWS•Todara slaves and GIL HOPENSTAND -Seaches Events The Orange County Register • ecant.a coons -Education •EI Toro HUNTINGTON BEACH—The city's move to annex the •FinmaAcN Bolsa Chica wetlands is the latest chapter in a development aegei ilna debate that has spanned 25 years. •°cUieens •PoINa&Government "The company really has no position one way or the other on Refgmn In E&uraaon annexation," said Lucy Dunn,spokeswoman for Hearthside •Special FeaWres EDUCATION Homes,which plans to build houses in the Bolsa Chica area. EMPLOYMENT ENTERTAINMENT& TRAVEL Here's how the pending annexation developed: FUN&GAMES HEALTH&FITNESS LIBERTY ONLINE e 1970—Signal Landmark,now a subsidiary of California LIVING&SHOPPING Coastal Communities Inc.—the parent company of POLITICS& GOVERNMENT Hearthside Homes and formerly known as Koll Real Estate REAL ESTATE Group Inc.—buys 1,600 acres in and around the Bolsa Chica SCIENCE& W TECHNOLOGY wetlands. SERVICES& e 1973—State acquires 300 acres in lowlands from Signal. PROMOTIONS e 1976—Amigos de Bolsa Chico founded. Group's lawsuits SPORTS&WEATHER RECREATION will hold up development. e 1978—State builds levee,enclosing 150 acres of the state's 300-acre parcel. Seawater once again pours into Bolsa Chica and restores a portion of wetlands. . 1982—County supervisors approve 5,700 homes,boat slips, a navigable ocean entrance and 600 acres of salt marshes. e 1985—County supervisors approve 5,700 homes,a 1,300-slip marina,915 acres of restored wetlands,oceanfront hotels, shops and restaurants. • 1992—Bolas Chica Land Trust forms to save the area as an ecological preserve held in public trust forever. Group's lawsuits will hold up development.City Council approves 106-acre Bolas Chica Regional Park,later renamed for Harriett , Wieder. . 1994—County supervisors approve plan for 3,300 homes, including 900 in the lowlands. California Coastal Commission approves plan in January 1996. e February 1997—State purchases 880 acres of Bolsa Chica and is developing wetland preservation plan.Number of homes scaled down to 2,400. e May 1997—Superior Court judge sends plan back to Coastal Commission, number of homes reduced to 1,235. e November 1997—County supervisors unanimously approve http://www.ocmgister.con)/community/bolsas23w.shtml 2/23/99 now aofsa k.mca oeoafe oevefopeo over years rage z of scaled down Bolsa Chica plan. . February 1998—Judge sends Boise Chica plan back to Coastal Commission. . January 1999—Decision on lawsuit delayed by state court of appeals.Judgment expected by May. newspaper e co MIMmeOmWcomaae&W f9eaee oommenaro mmoaMra)Ilnk.haeeom.mm http://www.om-gister.rom/community/bolsas23w.shtml 2123/99 nunungwn SVIUVes w rwuex vUtsd Lsuea weuwrus,1Vsesa rage t Ul ewS f I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP`a O.n... .A.....siw Minxi.Wm PX»i.n raniJaPN"rMe ues ay, February 23, 1999 Huntington Moves to Annex Bolsa Chica Wetlands,Mesa ■Environment: Council's 5-2 vote could mean eventual resolution of a 30-year fight over the 1,600-acre area. By LESLEY WRIGHT,Special to The Times n a move that may signal an end to the 30-year struggle RELAYED over the future of the Bolsa Chica wetlands,Huntington O.C.CSECTION Beach's City Council voted 5 to 2 Monday to begin the process of annexing the area. MAIN PAGE Some council members said their hope is that bringing all 1,600 acres of the pristine coastal land under city jurisdiction NEWS BY will give them some leverage with landowner Hearthside COMMUNITY Homes Inc.,formerly known as Koll Real Estate Group. SPORTS "Our first consideration should be saving that precious area," Councilwoman Shirley S. Dettloff said. "But we must be PREP SPORTS prepared for a development project that is moving very quickly. We must be sure that development is done the right BUSINESS way." SO CAL LIVING More than 100 environmentalists and other residents packed council chambers to hear the debate. Two dozen of them spoke, CALENDAR begging the council to preserve the land as open space. "We understand annexation will give[city] water to a CALENDAR developer," said Paul Horgan of Bolas Chica Land Trust,a WEEKEND group trying to buy the land to prevent it from being HOME DESIGN developed. "Ask your staff one more question:How we you going to give Bolsa Chica a proper funeral?" COMMENTARY The stakes are high for city officials,most of whom have T.V.TIMES played some part in the fight to stop development in Bolas Chica The city stands to gain$2 million in one-time permit and other fees if it annexes the property now.After development, annexing a residential area could cost the city more in new ADVERTISEMENT services than the homes would pay in taxes. Monday's decision marked just the fast step toward what is ,RIUM,Q; certain to be intense negotiation over the future of the 200-acre r MasuyDy, mesa that overlooks the wetlands. The bulk of the wetlands was removed from the struggle in http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016833.html 2/23/99 aupGrYuulb DdcA l Ua uu �owmon Plan Page 2 oI L "The message is 'Let's get the people involved . . . and have one voice, one group,' " Mayor Pro Tem Dave Garofalo said. "If we're going to get things together, we need to [get] the state senators and assembly members involved rather than get six mayors on a plane." Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: BEACHES--ORANGE COUNTY EROSION SAND TOM WILSON ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.You will not he charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. GO Id ❑ e% Go http://www.latimes.com/HONE/NEWS/ORANGEJOCNEWS/t000017153.btm] 224/99 toxic Soup Unaer wavy ease ureps towara water Supply rage t ut ews oo ie n w II / ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP Monday, Febmary 22, 1999 Toxic Soup Under Navy Base Creeps Toward Water Supply .Environment: The Seal Beach plume is half a mile long, composed of chemicals used to clean rocket boosters for the first moon landing. By JANET WIGSON, Times Staff Writer n underground plume of toxic waste is slowly seeping toward subsurface drinking water supplies for Seal RELATED Beach and the Naval Weapons Station there,documents O.C.SECTIONS and interviews show. MAIN PAGE The plume is a half-mile-long stew of chemicals once used to clean rocket boosters that blasted Apollo I l to the moon. NEWS BY The Saturn V boosters were built at the weapons station in the COMMUNITY late 1960s and early '70s by what was then North American SPORTS Rockwell. "This was a time when there was a race to put man on the PREP SPORTS moon,to beat the Soviet Union. It's a time when certain risks were taken," said Gregg Smith,spokesman for the weapons BUSINESS station. SO CAL LIVING David Baillie,environmental director for the base, said, "Back then . . .what everybody thought was,'You pour it in the CALENDAR ground and it goes away.' As the whole country got smarter,we said 'OK, what do we have left behind?' " CALENDAR Officials say the plume poses no immediate danger to WEEKEND drinking water supplies. But extensive testing is being HOME DESIGN conducted to determine potential health risks and how to contain or remove the spreading chemicals before they reach at COMMENTARY least one nearby drinking well. T.V.TIMES Tests concluded this month found 163,000 parts per billion of TCE,a cancer-causing toxic solvent, in water pumped from the middle of the top layer of the plume. The safe level for drinking water is 5 parts per billion,according to federal and state standards. ADVERTISEMENT Breathing,drinking or swimming in water with high levels of TCE may cause liver and long damage,abnormal heartbeat, 7•4 ANNUA coma and even death. \fy'"� Because the plume is beneath the surface of a secured e 0 J military base, experts agree there is not an immediate threat. http://www.latimes.com/IiOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t00001654l.html 2/22199 r uw.c neup unuer .Navy nase�meps IOwarn wafer auppry rage a or•Q "Nobody's going to say'I'm thirsty' and bend down and have a drink," said geologist Carl Lind of Bechtel National Inc.,the San Diego-based contractor that conducted the tests. But there is a long-term risk to drinking water supplies because toxic plumes are tricky to clean up or contain. +�c "Obviously,there is cause for concem," said Patricia Universi Hannon of the state's Regional Water Quality Control Board Allianc ty division that handles Seal Beach. 'There is no immediate risk. . . but there is real concern." The plume,which measures 2,500 by 2,000 feet in its widest layer,has descended 195 feet beneath the surface and is almost one-third of its way to the nearest drinking water aquifer, at 600 feet. There are two drinking water wells near the contaminated site,one owned by the military base,the other by the city of Seal Beach. But they draw water from deep below the plume, officials say. The plume also is far from the national wildlife refuge on the base,they said,and is generally drifting southwest,away from populated areas such as Leisure World or downtown Seal Beach. During the rainy season,it partially reverses direction,the tests found. Scientists involved in the project say there is no way to know exactly why there is contamination at the site.They theorize that the chemicals,mostly TCE,may have leaked from tanker trucks that were driven onto the base at the north end, new Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue.The trucks pumped their liquid cargo into two storage tanks in use from 1962 to 1973. Today, the tanks sit empty and rusting outside a complex of hulking gray metal buildings that are a familiar sight to anyone driving along the San Diego Freeway past Seal Beach. The buildings,known as the Research and Testing Evaluation Center,were rented by NASA and used by North American Rockwell to build the second stage of the Sarum V boosters,one of which blasted Neil Armstrong and his fellow astronauts toward the moon in July 1969. During the assembly process,TCE was pumped into the buildings by hose and sprayed inside the boosters to remove oil and grit. "Clamps may not have been tightened properly, a gallon may have been spilled here or there," said Robert Robinson, who is coordinating a massive cleanup project at the base involving several dozen sites. "But when it's a gallon of something that is measured in parts per billion, you want to make sure. . . it won't ever he a problem." Geologist Lind agreed. "A cup a day here,a cup there,and ' you've got that huge plume underneath now. It's amazing." TCE,or trichlomethylene,is the same chemical that has been detected in huge underground plumes threatening drinking water supplies for 600,000 residents in San Bernardino and Riverside counties.A 3-mile-wide plume under the Woodbridge section of Irvine contains both TCE left in the soil by the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station and nitrates from area farming.Navy officials said the plume associated with the Saturn V construction,and another smaller one on the base, are httpJ/www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016541.html 2/22/99 t owc n0up unaer tNavy vase i reeps i owaro wmer auppty rage J ut v "a drop in the bucket" compared with the San Bernardino and Irvine plumes. But concerned Seal Beach residents said they will monitor carefully how the situation is handled. "This is our drinking water area, right here,"said Mario Voce,a Seal Beach artist and longtime activist who co-chairs a Restoration Advisory Board established by the Navy to offer input on the cleanup of hazardous waste at the base. "I think they know we're going to be breathing hard down their necks." Robinson,the cleanup coordinator,said the slow seepage of the toxic waste through layers of soil, sand and clay would filter and disperse many of the contaminants. Baillie noted that the plume was moving extremely slowly and appeared to be blocked by a layer of thick clay. "It took 30 years to get this deep,"he said,referring to the current 195 feet. Still,the plume could reach the Navy well "in the next decade," according to the Bechtel draft report. And Hannon of the Regional Water Quality Control Board said the plume could find an opening in the clay strata and spread faster. "Anything's possible," she said. She and community activists said the Navy appeared to be doing what it should to determine how to best contain and clean up the plume. There are several options normally used to handle an underground toxic plume: leaving it in place and injecting it with substances to neutralize the poison; leaving it in place and monitoring it to see if it disperses naturally;or pumping the contaminated water out,removing the toxic chemicals and disposing of both. As part of the recent testing,300,000 gallons of contaminated water from the plume have already been pumped out. The water was treated and released into a storm channel that drains into the Pacific Ocean. The environmental quality control board that advises the Seal Beach City Council asked last week that testing be expanded to off-base areas if necessary. "There's no problem with that," Robinson said. "But it's not necessary from what we've seen." RRR Navy Attacks Clean-Up Sites Military officials are trying to prevent an underground toxic plume from drifting into the water table beneath the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station. Loaded with chemicals used to build , rockets in the 1970s,the plume extends from one of 27 hazardous waste sites targeted for cleanup. (map) Gaging the Plume The toxic plume,which reaches 195 feet deep, is about a a third of the way to the nearest drinking water aquifer at 600 feet. Source:The Weapons Support Facility-- Seal Beach Graphics reporting by BRADY MacDONALD/Los http•J/www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016541.html 2122/99 Interior Secretary Pulls Out of Water Otspute rage i or o ewa _ Ir ae n ax Z ao A SECTION N6LP? 1 " . iluhiggest searchable help wanted sedionandjohI 11 1'hurs ay, February 11, 1993 Interior Secretary Pulls Out of Water Dispute ■Allocation: Move halts mediation. State's share of Colorado River could be at stake. By TONY PERRY, Timet Staff Wrtw nterior Secretary Bruce Babbitt on Wednesday halted his attempts to mediate an increasingly bitter dispute between the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and two agricultural irrigation districts--a sign that a ADVERTISEMENT water deal considered key to the state's water future may be collapsing. If negotiations fail between the MWD,the Imperial Irrigation District and the Coachella Valley Water District,it N w w s could set off a domino effect that might prompt Babbitt to carry through on his oft-stated threat to reduce the amount of water California receives from the Colorado River. Babbitt is withdrawing from the negotiations out of , annoyance at the MWD's recent insistence that he consider - changing the 1931 agreement that gives farmers more than 75%of the state's annual allocation from the Colorado River. The MWD suggestion,an eleventh-hour change in position after years of negotiation,has infuriated farmers and set off threats of litigation. Babbitt told MWD directors two weeks ago that he does not have the authority to change the 1931 agreement and that the MWD's insistence otherwise threatens to scuttle a carefully negotiated water transfer between Imperial Valley and San Diego County. So far,the MWD has refused to back down. In effect,Babbitt is calling the MWD's bluff to determine whether the agency will risk having the state's Colorado River share reduced by continuing to bring up the 1931 agreement as part of its negotiations with Imperial and Coachella. On the other hand,if the MWD remains firm and declines to sign an agreement with Imperial and Coachella unless modifications are made in the allocation formula,it would test r whether Babbitt's threat is real. Many in the water industry believe that no secretary of the Interior will ever reduce water allocations to California and thus bring economic turmoil to the largest state in the nation, particularly as a presidential election approaches. In a fax to all sides,Babbitt encouraged the MWD and the two agricultural irrigation districts to continue negotiations without his assistance—although history suggests that without outside assistance, California water disputes are rarely settled. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000013155.html 2111/99 interior secretary rents Vut of water utspute rags_of "It appears to me that the parties,having come so close to agreement in January,are now drifting apart," Babbitt wrote. "I truly hope this does not signal the onset of yet another western water war." Babbitt suggested that the California agencies settle their differences before he resumes his mediation. Negotiations had been set to resume today in Los Angeles with a mediator assigned by Babbitt,and further meetings had been planned for Washington.At issue are matters of how much water each party can expect in dry years and wet years and who will pay for conveyance and storage facilities. Under the 1931 agreement,California is assured 4.4 million acre-feet of water a year from the Colorado—with 3.85 million of that split among irrigation districts in the Imperial, Coachella and Palo Verde valleys,and 550,000 acre-feet allotted to the MWD. In recent years,however,the MWD,which serves 16 million residents,has annually received several hundred thousand acre-feet above its allotment. With its entitlement and the "surplus"allotment,California's take from the Colorado River has reached 5.2-million acre-feet. Babbitt has insisted that California go on a water diet and learn to live within its 4.4-million share because surpluses will not be available indefinitely. As a motivation for California to fend ways to cut its water use, Babbitt has threatened to reduce the allocations of surplus water. Jesse Silva,acting general manager of the Imperial Irrigation District,said of Babbitt's Withdrawal from mediation: "We're sorry that MWD's demand brought this situation on. We don4 want to see it interfere with the San Diego agreement." Joseph Parker, San Diego County Water Authority board chairman,said, "This is an unfortunate turn of events that could put our transfer[with Imperial Valley] in peril." He said the issue is made more difficult by"a certain amount of belligerence" by various parties. The Imperial Irrigation District has agreed to sell up to 300,000 acre-feet of water a year to San Diego—enough for 2.4 million people—but the deal can only be consummated if the MWD,Imperial and Coachella dispute is settled. MWD Chairman Phillip J.Pace declined to comment on Babbitfs move,referring instead to a letter sent Wednesday to Imperial Irrigation District officials. Pace wrote that he was heartened by comments made Tuesday at the MWD meeting by Imperial Irrigation District board President Bence Kuhn that he would be willing to continue discussions with the MWD. Pace,however,chose to overlook less accommodating comments,including a vow by Imperial board member Andy Home that "I can assure you we will not stand by and allow our water to he taken. We will resist such efforts with every resource at our disposal." Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: BRUCE BABBIT METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT.COLORADO RIVER.WATER—CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA—AGRICULTURE. http://www.latimes.com/HONIE/NEWS/ASECTION/t000013155.hbnl 2/11/99 vaclaaayc %.vunL.y aenrLdL,Iun ulbt-ncib Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # .�Date Subject Los Angeles Times The MWD has irritated the Legislature—where a MWD Keeps hearing is net for today—and has come away bitterly disappointed in negotiations over future water sup- p es. Pot Near Boil a the dispute over cleaning up the a north delta, the MWD's preferred alternative, a north-soth Pieaca sae WATER,AW WATER. Y —L_t In December, Jolts Foley, wft,ho �•n r WATER: x 1-1 Sa]`g`t rune the water and newer district ui Water Wars 1 YLaguna term Niguel, ended lids hen- ear term us MWD hoard then- man.Over �'As ct successor,board , who bets selected evllip J. Pace, who ■ Resources: Bruised and embattled, Mona a land development firm er the agency has adopted an aggressive . Allocation ofMontebelloCs, tra e a board member j of the Central Basin Municipal stance in questioning the accords that I Water District. Continued from AS With the more assertive Pace as govern its allocations. Continued canal that would allow I chairman, the MWD board has the MWD to receive dean water adopted an aggressive strategy for BY TONY PERRY . from north of the delta, has been getting more water from the Colo- TIMES UJkFFw11miR put on the back burned. Former rado Rivar.Nomore Mr.Conseiaun. The governing board of the Me Gov. Pete Wdeon, long a canal The Pace-led strategy has been Metropolitan Water supporter, backed down rather to launch an assault on the mot District of Southern California took time last week to than go to war with Northern heavily fortified spot of legal and search for the appropriate term to describe the ruckus California and the environmental political high ground in the Call- it has kicked uprecentlyinthewaterworld movement. - forma wale was map: the 1931 "It's fairly obvious to me that we're in battle—full In the Colorado River dispute, agreement that assures that more battle," said Jorge G. Castro, who represents the Wilson and the Legislature forced than 75% of the state's annual Central Basin Municipal Water District the MWD to accept a massive sale allmUon of Colorado River water "I wouldn't characterize It BE starting a war," said of water from the Imperial Irriga- i goes to Imperial, Coachella and Bill Luddy, who represents Los Angeles. "I would tion District to the San Diego tiny isUto a serving farmers in the characterize It Be asking a clear and necessary County Water Authority,long the Palo Verde Valley and Yuma.Ariz. question.' MWD's biggest and most dissatis- In the Wodraska-Foley era, the Whatever you call it,the MWD's recent strategy of Bel member and customer. .MWD strategy was to muffle its questioning whether four agricultural Irrigation die- The delta dispute is pretty much diacantent over the 1931 agreement tricts should continue getting the had's share of the beyond the MWD's influence. An lest itMeup the agricultural irriga- etate's annual allmation from the Colorado River ban attempt at forging a pro-canal tion districts and lead to cosily and been explosive from San Diego to Washington, alliance between water agencies in time-consuming litigation. Not that fighting over water is,new to the MWD. the south and north and more That strategy ended last month This in the agency that made modern Southern moderate environmental groups when the MWD board endorsed a failed policy statement asking Interim NEWSANALYSIS But in the Colorado River con- Secretary Bruce Babbitt te con- alilornia areality by 5 htin and tar troversy,the MWD has some lev- cider changing the 1931 agmation rOffw 1,le g g largely whining the stage,possibly for the last time m a formula and amusing Babbitt of gal and engineering battles to provide this generation. The Colorado River ignoring the needs of coastal :emiarld region with a water supply that is, reliable, negotiations are supposed to Battle Southern California. )IMUU and affordable. 'matters of allocation and efficient The reaction was predictable: Now the MWD is,engaged in a two-front war that use for decades. The Imperial district,where water vill determine the future of its main sources of water: Unless,the MWD gets a deal with rights date to 1895, went ballistic, he Sacrament Di Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the Colorado the Imperial Irrigation strict and Coachella was peeved and San s I iver, the Coachella Valley Water Dis- Diego expressed shock. Rightly or wrongly, the MWD says It is being trlct over water,allocations and Babbitt,considered the most wa- ummeled in both disputes and that the future of 18 I money, the water sale between ter-knowledgeable Interior seede- UIRon people and a$500,-billion regional economy is, Imperial and San Diego,considered lazy in the nation's history,said he I Pull. crucial to the states water future, lacked authority to change the As a result the mega-agency has adopted a policy cannot be conaummated 1931 agreement. He implored the :tat, once the bureauedatese is stripped away, boils Add to this the fact that the MWD to drop the matte. Others own to: "We're mad as heft and not going in take It MWD is undergoing a leadership have done likewise. nymore." change at the top,always a props- "Were baffled that @letropch- MWD seems to feel very put upon,"said an outside tioo time fur repudiating old strat- tan] would take unilateral,warlike ffidal.Put upon and misunderstood i allies and developing new ones. actions," Bruce Kuhn, president of At the Tuesday meeting,Luddy made a comment to In October, John Wodraska re- the Imperial Irrigation District,told is effect that the MWD's hometown of I.o Angeles is Biped as general manager to take the MWD board Iasi week. "We j n island of sanity in an otherwise bizarre world a lucrative job in the private sector. urge you to rethink what you are Not only has the MWD been losing battles lately,it A nationwide search is underway doing before you provoke a water 38 not been making many friends. for Wodra ka's successor. crisis in which everyone will lase." Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page 7F Date Subject Los Angeles 'riMes G A day later,Babbitt,a msperated at the in-your-face time of letters from Pace, called off his attempts to mediate negotiations between the MWD,Imperial and Coachella. Part of Babbitt's frustration is that he felt the MWD had con- cluded in the latter stages of the Wodraska-Foley era that Its beet bet was to cooperate with the San Diego-Imperial deal in order to get two things it wants desperately: *More generous rules about when the MWD tan receivesurplus water from the Colorado River. •A new method of operating Lake Mead. the reservoir behind Hoover Dam,that would also mean more water for the MWD. r allow Laver vrvmg Lmna New borrow rage 1 or y eWS _'+ GO Te A ex _ _ "_ GO YI I FRONT PAGE HELPI • • • I♦i .II urs ay, elomary I , 1999 Yellow River Giving China New Sorrow ■Asia: Overuse,dry weather deplete waterway once known for flooding. By HENRYCHU, Times Staff Writer 121 AWANG, China--She gave birth to one of the world's most glorious ancient civilizations. For more than 4,000 years,she has nurtured billions of fields and farmers spread alongside her. Millions still rely on her bounty today. ADVEFTISEMEW But like so many working mothers,the Yellow River is exhausted, her resources dwindling, her energy flagging. The 3,600-mile-long waterway known throughout history as "China's sorrow" because of a penchant for spilling over is now News causing despair for precisely the opposite reason: It is drying UP. "We depend on the Yellow River for our lives," said Wu w hr'r I� Rachun,a wiry farmer in this dusty hamlet in China's r•t••••�vt•• b Shandong province in the east. "But I haven't watered my fields once since sowing season last October." How low Wu's predicament is a woefully familiar one as overuse, can we go? countoor ry's planning ty all water ystems,d dry climatic daffec g deplete one rural and s urban residents alike. While the world's attention focused last summer on the devastating Yangtze River floods in central and southern China, northern China--fed by the Yellow River and home to half the country's 1.2 billion people--was grappling with its own water problem: a worsening shortage of enormous proportions. More than 300 of the north's 600 cities suffer from a lack of water, so acute in some places that residents are allotted a meager trickle for only a few hours each day. Large metropolises like Beijing,and industrial centers such as the city of Taiyuan, have pumped so much water from underground sources that the aquifers cannot keep up. Here in Shandong province,China's breadbasket, many t farmers count themselves lucky if they can irrigate their fields once a year. In 1997--the worst year on record--the Yellow River was so drained by the time it coursed through Shandong, its last stop before the sea,that it failed to reach the ocean for a staggering 266 days. Some tributaries and lakes have vanished. "Water is desperately short," said Daniel Gunaratnam,an expert at the World Bank who is based in Beijing. China's water deficit ranges between 22 billion and 33 billion tons, Gunaratnarn estimates—about five to seven times http://www.latimes.com/HONIEtNEWS/FRONT/t00001514l.htnil 2/18/99 ....v.. .....,. w r u.�.umm,vc ry ouuuw rage z or 4 the amount that Southern California uses a year.By 2030,the shortfall could rise as high as 110 billion tons as the population increases to 1.5 billion. The country's troubles stem from a cruel trick of nature on China and the heavy demands of China on nature. Although the Chinese population is split relatively evenly between the north and south,arable land and available water are not so equally divided.Just 38%of China's farmland is in the south,but the region enjoys 82%of China's water resources. By contrast,northern China boasts 62%of the country's cultivated soil,but a paltry 18%of its water. A Once-Abundant Waterway in Retreat For millenniums after Chinese civilization sprang up along the banks of the Yellow River,the waterway's abundance was enough—sometimes too much. Constant overflows claimed lives and livelihoods.A century ago,a vast swath of the Shandong plain lay submerged under the river's muddy flow,which destroyed fields and washed away pieces of the delicate pottery, long buried,that the earliest Chinese settlers there fashioned 4,000 years ago. Since then,those settlers'modem descendants have grown exponentially in number across China—by 700 million,or 2 1/2 times the entire U.S.population, in the past 50 years alone. Even so, for the inhabitants who sheltered next to it, China's "mother river,"as many locals call the Yellow,still offered an embarrassment of riches after the People's Republic was founded in 1949. "Forty years ago,there was so much water that you could sit on the embankment,wait for the fish to swim by,and go down and catch them,"said Li Wendong,a farmer in Jijis,a village neighboring Dawang. Li,43,continued sadly,"There are no fish now because there's not enough water for them to grow." Instead, Li's black-coated sheep forage for food where once they would have drowned. The rivets retreat has left behind vast expanses of parched earth, shivered into crazy shapes like a broken pane of brown glass. "People can even drive on the riverbed,especially in the eastern part of Henan[province] and Shandong," said Liu Yonggong,a professor at China Agricultural University in Beijing. The paucity of water has exacted a huge economic toll on the world's most-populous nation. Up to 33 million tons in crops are lost each year because of drought,comparable in value to the damage wrought by floods, Gunaramam said. Four years ago,chronic water shortages drove down Shandong's grain harvest by nearly 3.3 million tons--enough to feed 9 million people,according to the Washington-based Worldwatch institute. This has prompted fear in some quarters that China,the world's leading grain producer,may turn to massive grain imports to compensate for declining yields,triggering a price increase that would send shock waves through the world food supply,especially in poorer countries. Chinese industry also suffers from the dearth of water, losing as much as$28 billion a year in output. http://www.latimes.com/HONIE/NEWS/FROM/t00001514l.html 2/18/99 r ellow luver blvlrlg lAlna New borrow rage ul Y Ironically,the turnabout in water availability,from too much to too little,is a direct result of China's economic boom in the past 20 years.The country's market-oriented reforms have pulled millions out of poverty—but at tremendous cost to its natural resources. Farmers now push for higher and higher yields,which demand more and more water,especially with the widespread use of inefficient irrigation systems. Heavy industries present another major drain. Affluent urban lifestyles also strain the water supply,as residents snap up Western-style toilets and washing machines, and consume more meat and alcohol,which requires more grain--and therefore more water--to fad livestock and to produce liquor. Moreover,high levels of pollution have snatched away water suitable for irrigation and for drinking. In some areas, river water is "so poisonous you can't use it," Liu said. Excessive Pumping Draining Aquifers Desperate for usable water,both the cities and rural areas of the north have turned to underground sources. But excessive pumping has outpaced the aquifers'ability to replenish themselves. A 1997 study conducted by Liu discovered that the water tables beneath much of northern China are shrinking by about 5 feet every year.Farmers are drilling deeper and deeper wells, but "at some point,people can no longer afford to pump water from ever-increasing depths,"said Lester Brown,president of Worldwatch. Such overuse gives residents around Beijing a sinking feeling--literally.Three suburban neighborhoods have dropped by as much as 14 inches during the past decade,breaking pipes and causing other damage as the ground gives way over the compacted water tables. The Chinese capital sucks out 220 million tons of subterranean water a year. To slow down the depletion,some local authorities have launched conservation campaigns,erecting billboards and running TV commercials exhorting residents to "save every drop of water." But attitudes such as Li Yuan's are hard to combat. "Having a washing machine and shower is my right and encouraged by the government as well. Haven't you read newspaper stories about the government encouraging [economic]consumption?"the 37-year-old telecommunications employee asked. "I don't think that by taking fewer showers I can increase the water supply." One possible solution is raising the price of water, , incredibly cheap by Western standards.After a series of rate increases,Beijingers still,pay only about 11 cents a ton-- equivalent to about 265 gallons,nearly what Angelenos use per capita every two days.In rural areas,the cost can be less than half a cent.The lowpices induce apathy about waste among much of the population;in public buildings,broken taps spewing water 24 hours a day are not uncommon,with no one around who cares enough to repair them. The state is also trying to come up with an enforceable national policy for equitable water distribution,partly to http://www.latimes.com/HOMF./NEWS/FRONTR000015141.html 2/18/99 a cuuw !V ver Ulvulg l tuna Acw borrow Page Y W Y prevent regional disputes,which have already broken out in some areas.Downstream users gripe that those along the upper reaches of the Yellow River hog the water without thought to the needs of people below. For the longer term,engineers are studying the long- discussed possibility of hauling water up to northern China from the Yangtze River or its tributaries in the south.These would be massive projects requiring billions of dollars,posing a tricky political and economic calculus for the Communist regime. Pressure on Officials to Address Shortage But the Beijing leadership may have little choice as the shortage mounts. Beyond increased demand Chinese scientists forecast that global warming will further sap water supplies in coming years through increased evaporation,a development that could extend the boundaries of deserts in the north. Here in Shandong,provincial authorities are already crafting plans for a modest price hike and allotments that are more suitable to the needs of farmers,who use 8.8 billion tons of water a year to irrigate 20 million hectares of land. The city of Jinan,the provincial capital,has also moved to protect its biggest tourist attraction:a collection of 72 natural springs,with such poetic names as Gushing-from-the-Ground Spring and Pearl Spring. Their beauty inspired one of China's most famous writers, Lao She,to rhapsodize a few decades ago: Look at the three big springs. They roll and foam day and night throughout the year. . . Always so pure, always so lively, always so bright, gushing, gushing, gushing, never tiring,never retreating only nature has this power! But a recent visit showed the drubbing that nature has taken from humankind. In a sad illustration of northern China's plight, Gushing-from-the-Ground Spring didn't:It barely managed to burp a small stream of bubbles. Couvriv.6t 1999 Los Angeles Tunes.All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Tunes for similar storia about DROUGHTS—CHINA.WATER SHORTAGES.YELLOW RIVER.You , will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. lNews; 60 I n B% GO http://www.latimes.comtHONIE/NEWS/FRONT/t000015141.htm1 2118/99 Tor Image-Battered Congress, Y2K Problem Could Utter a Balm rage 1 oi o ewe • 0 B A SECTION HELF1 elleh then- 4. i SOUTHERN CALIFOAXG'B 10BSBURCE'" --—_ Prt ay, Pebruary , 1999 For Image-Battered Congress, Y2K Problem Could Offer a Balm m Politics: Lawmakers, struggling to move past impeachment divisiveness, launch measures with which most can agree. By FA YE FIORE, Times Staff Writer ASHINGTON--With the fateful click of the year 2000 scarcely 10 months away,members of Congress are seizing on an issue that some hope could help transform their damaged public image from Do-Little Impeachers to ADVERTISEMENT Millennial Rescue Squad. A In the early stages of the congressional session, several bills have been introduced in what analysts expect will be an PEPPERDINE avalanche of Y2K legislation,even though lawmakers are no MBA more sure than computer experts whether Jan. 1 will bring technological Armageddon orjust another turn of the calendar ® page. Congress is taking no chances. One of the first bills , 1 introduced seeks to swat the dreaded millennium bug by fiddling with the calendar itself. As fate has it,Jan. 1, 2000,falls on a Saturday, and, University according to federal law,the holiday must be observed on .W Alliance' Friday--24 hours before the witching hour. The measure, sponsored by Rep. John Linder(R-Ga.),would move the official holiday to Monday, Jan. 3, reasoning that, if society as we know it does indeed come to a crashing halt,the American people could use some extra time to sift through the rubble. "It's like Joshua asking the sun and the moon to stand still so Israel could defeat the Amorites," said James Pinkerton,a GOP pundit at Georgetown University. California Weighs In Few states are as Y2K-worried as California,home to more than 20%of the nation's high-tech jobs and one-third of its biotech industry,thus the parade of lawmakersjumping to t propose corrective bills that their constituents are likely to appreciate. This week alone,four California members pitched two separate measures to try to prevent$1 trillion in lawsuits expected to arise from year 2000 glitches,with each of the lawmakers predicting some sort of peril if Congress does not act soon. "Remember,we're going into a situation that's absolutely unprecedented," Sen. Dianne Feinstein(D-Calif) said while http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000017988.html 2/26/99 rut matge-naucrea wngress, t Lt.rrootem t-owo uner a tfatm rage L of J unveiling the "Year 2000 Fairness and Responsibility Act," aimed at preventing frivolous lawsuits. "We have restructured our economy's focus into a high-technology,biotechnology economy . . . and in order to protect people's employment,we have to take some precautionary measures." "This is incredibly important to California,"said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch(R-Utah),the bill's co-sponsor. "There are threats of lawsuits hanging all over this right now.That's what is driving this." On the House side, Reps. David Dreier(R-San Dimas), Christopher Cox(R-Newport Beach)and Calvin M.Dooley (D-Visalia)stood together earlier this week to announce the virtually identical "Year 2000 Readiness and Responsibility Act of 1999." In general,the bills require a 90-day "cooling-off period" before Y2K-related lawsuits could be filed,limit punitive damages to$250,000 and cap fees for lawyers working on such suits at$I,000 an hour. And, in an effort to encourage businesses to spend their money fixing potential problems rather than fending off lawsuits,the bills reward those who take active steps with protections in the event litigation is eventually filed. If a hotel, for example,attempted to prevent its computer-operated elevators from crashing,the effort would be taken into account even if there was a mishap. In turn, businesses that fail to act would be subject to greater exposure in court. Personal injury awards would not be limited An Issue Yielding Little Argument Supported by dozens of industry groups and opposed by trial lawyers,the legislation stems from widespread fear in the business community that any trouble-shooting now would be seen as an acknowledgment of problems that could be used in court later. "To even say I'm afraid I might get sued is like throwing blood in the water;the fins begin to go round and round," one Washington business leader said. The yearning among lawmakers to move beyond the divisiveness and distraction of President Clinton's impeachment trial helps explain the expected blimrd of Y2K- related legislation. Next Tuesday,the Senate is scheduled to vote on a bill to provide small business loans for technological upgrades,then meet in closed session for a briefing on potential Y2K problems involving national security and classified information. "Congress wants to be known as somebody who gets under the hood of the car and fixes things,"said lack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont. To paraphrase former New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia's observation about street cleaning,there is no Republican or Democratic way to fix a computer.And there seldom comes along an issue so easy for both parties to rally around,as evidenced by the bipartisan love-felt displayed at various conferences this week touting Y2K bills—a notable http://www.latimes.com/HOMF./NEWS/ASECTlON/t000017988.html 2/26/99 I-or Image-Hamereo Longress, V 11S problem(,cold Utter a Halm page i of J shift from the recent acrimony over impeachment. "Rational politicians are looking for something they can accomplish, that President Clinton won't veto, that doesn't cause a government shutdown so they can say they enacted something with bipartisan support," Pinkerton said. "And Y2K reform is like the metric system--it seems like a good idea, everybody's for it,nobody really understands it and you assume somebody else is going to handle it.The average voter stuck on the 405 Freeway would say,'Yes,that's what they should be doing."' Beyond actual legislation,Congress has been working steadily to make sure the federal government--among the nation's largest computer users—attends to its housekeeping. Rep. Stephen Horn(R-Long Beach),who chairs the House subcommittee investigating the year 2000 problem,has issued seven report cards grading the federal government on its progress toward Y2K compatibility. Last week he gave it a C- plus. Covering the Bases And although Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has cautioned consumers against making extra-large pre-New Year's bank withdrawals because they fear automated teller failures,the Fed plans to stockpile an extra$200 billion in cash just in case, about one-third more than usual. In the end,many of the gestures and legislation by Congress probably will be symbolic--a lot of the bills simply will not pass. And it is possible that, if all this worry turns out to be for naught,America will wake up Jan. 2 with a dozen or so laws it does not need. "In which case," Pitney said, "smart members of Congress will stand up and declare success." Copyriaht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: CONGRESS(_U.S.),20OYEAR,COMPUTERS,LEGISLATI N!-- UN D TATES,UNITED STATES POLITICS.Yo—u wit n be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ews ooISite index + eo http:/Avww.latimes.00m/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000017988.html 2/26/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register Babbitt quits city-farm water talks NEGOTIATIONS: The does not signal the onset of yet In recent years,thanks to offi- interior secretary's de- another Western water war," cisl "surpluses" declared by said a letter from Babbitt to the Babbitt, the MWD has been si- eision is seen as less- head of the Metropolitan Water phoning several hundred thou- enin hopes for a deal. District,with copies to all sides. sand acre-feet more than its B P The giant MWD,wholesaler to share from the river, pushing The Auoriated tress 16 million Southern Californians, California's take as high as has been negotiating with the Im. S.2 million acre-feet. _ LOS ANGELES—Water nego- pedal Irrigation District and the Babbitt has repeatedly warned tiations between Southern Cali- Coachella Valley Water District the state to start drinking within for s's major city and farm sup- over issues such as how much its means and has threatened to ter rInterior ruSecretary B Bruce m der yeareach shouldand who,especially pay stop declaring surpluses — a Secretary hi years,and who should pay move that could reduce urban Babbitt said is ute no longer to ship and store r water supplies drastically—un- mediate the dispute. Under a lure agreement, Cali- Tess California comes up with a Babbitt, who controls water the forma is assuredfrom the I- general plan to curb Colorado slate's allocation r, water from feet of water a year from the Col- River ase. the Colorado River,has suggest- orado. However, only S50,000 Babbitt's letter came just two- ad he might reduce California's acre-feet is budgeted for the pop- take If the talks fad. He encour- ulous coastal strip and booming days after he got a letter from aged both sides to keep negotiat- inland regions via [he MWD. MWD Chairman Phillip J. Pace Mg. The bulk, 3.SS million acre that questioned, as a matter of It appears to me that the par- feet,is spilt among irrigation di. "public policy," the notion that ties, having come so close to tricts to the Imperial, Coachella farmers should be allowed to re agreement in January, are now and Palo Verde valleys of south- sell publicly subsidized water to drifting apart. I truly hope this eastern California. cities at a markup. orange Lounty Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper I Section I Page # I Date subject IJ Los Angeles Times Clouds Over the Water dh its aggressive clam to addi- action," declared one irate farm leader. Bab- tional supplies from the Colorado bitt said he had nosuch power in any event. River,the Metropolitan Water Dis- The action comes during a transition at trict of Southern California risks a water war Metropolitan. Phillip J. Pace of Montebello that could doom promising efforts to solve has taken over as chairman while the board the state's most critical water problems. In a searches for a general manager to succeed stroke, the giant water wholesaler has John Woodraska, who resigned last fall. At brought down the wrath of fanners, the fed- the same time, a state Senate committee eral government and legislative critics who chaired by Sen. David Kelley (R-Idyllwild) are considering a restructuring—and prob- has resumed its hearings into management able weakening—of the agency. and oversight of the MWD. Kelley told a re- Superficially,the MWD's action seems con- cent hearing that MWD actions over the past sistent with its major goal:to assure Southern several years "have cast doubt on the ability California a reliable long-range water supply of MWD's management and board of direc- and, with it, sound economic growth. But in tors to properly carry out their duties." fact it may be counterproductive. The regi- Metropolitan may have a legitimate con- on's water future could be tied up in the cern that Imperial is wasting water and is try- courts for years or even be taken over by the ing to sell its water at inflated prices. More- state. over, Metropolitan officials believe that Tensions reached such a high point that In- everyone with a water deal is interested only tenor Secretary Bruce Babbitt broke off his in the MWD's deep pockets. efforts to mediate water allocation issues If there is waste, it must be stopped. And among the MWD,the Imperial Irrigation Dis- it's in the interests of afl to have an open, trict and the Coachella Valley Irrigation Dis- competitive water market in California. But trict. Normally a patient man, the ensper MWD officials are mistaken if they believe ated Babbitt was issuing a wake-up call to they can get more water from the Colorado MWD officials. River merely by demanding it. The proper The breakdown was precipitated by an worse is to return to the negotiating table. MWD suggestion that Babbitt use his powers The MWD board's more urgent priority as Colorado River water master to "pursue a should be to find the best possible general more appropriate allocation" to meet the dir manager and not to burden him or her with trict's future needs. That is a benign way of micromanaging and the kinds of policies that saying the district wants to take same of the have divided the West's water world into Op- water that historically has gone to agriculture posing camps. Metropolitan needs a visionary and instead supply it to the cities. The idea professions£ who can heal the agency's was received with hostility by the farmers, wounds and put it on a solid, consistent who view their right to 75% of California's worse. With anything less, the MWD is Colorado River supply as sacred. "A warlike headed for more trouble. r CALIFORNIA 0M San aemardino Las Angel" • CokradoApuetlu,% Riveraltla ARIZONA u✓"~' San Dfogo Colin tl �PoclBe Oay�. A9aedacf Coachella Valley Rher N,D W rL)K I blCAt-M ragc r ur . aW6_ GO le It e% II • I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP? They sold their house for HOW much I? l ucscFt%, cl ruary 10. 191 NEWPORTBEACH By JENIFER RAGLAND, (949)374-4232 rvine Ranch Water District board members have agreed RELATED Jto move forward with a revised Wetlands Water Supply project, one they say will result in less reclaimed water O.C.SECTIONS and harmful substances in Upper Newport Bay. The new MAIN PAGE project calls for an improved pumping station that will divert San Diego Creek water through a series of duck ponds near the NEWS BY district's treatment plant. Cif ITY The public is invited to a March 4 meeting at the district's SPORTS offices in Irvine to voice opinions on what should be included in an environmental report on the project. PREPSPORTS BUSINESS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved SO CAL LIVING 3 Search the archives of the Los AngaI s Times for similar stories about: CALENDAR IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT WATERUTILITIES— NEWPORT BEACH(CA),UPPER NEWPORT BAY.You will not be CALENDAR charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT I t A PEPPERDINE MBA http://www.latixnes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000014640.1.html 2/17/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register NEWPORT BEACH The public got a chance Thum day to examine the Irvine Ranch Water District's nely wetlands plan.The plan would cleanse San Diego Creek water by diverting it through the San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary before it goes to the Upper Bay. It also mixes reclaimed water with reservoir water,a mix that would only overflow into the bay in heavy rains. Two residents examining the plan expressed concerns about viruses and other TUSTIN pathogens in the recaimed water But Ken Thompson, PlanningCommissioner Paul . the district's water quality Jones will step down from director, said any pathogens that position to avoid any would be extremely small possible conflict of interest and closely monitored,and with his new job as general the overall water quality manager of the Irvine would be greatly improved. Ranch Water District.Jones —John Wacnwc, was appointed to the two- (71a)9533239 year term as commissioner in June 1998.The City Coun- cil will di=ss how it plans to replace him at its March 15 meeting. —George Stewart (714)565-6785 McIntyre, Donald From: Miles, Patrick Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 6:53 PM To: Y2K Steering Committee Cc: Information Technology; EMT Subject: State Computers 75% Free of Y2K Problems In case you missed this article in today's LA Times. "On Wednesday,Davis ordered a halt to any state government computer project not related to the Y2K problem. He also assigned a new high-level team of state and private experts to oversee the repairs and—just in case they fail-- ordered disaster officials to prepare a contingency plan. Davis officials said they hoped to pay for some of the remaining repairs by halting state Computer projects that do not involve Y2K problems. But they said they had not determined how much money would ultimately be needed." Click here for the full story: hhD:/Mw latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/STATEA000015169.1.html Thanks, Patrick S. Miles DirMor or Information Technology Orange County Sarfthon District (714)593-7290 (714)34 IMPagw pmiles�ocstl.com 1 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 1 of 10 Ready to n ClaxiheA 4Ae ' YeIlmvPayef ` Web Archive 1 Search Again ) eagvnghr o 19se The seam Times comp, y Local News : Sunday, January 17, 1999 1 Browse by Date Millions for new sewage plant, and nobody's making a stink by Ross Anderson Seattle Times staff reporter Within a few weeks, the Metropolitan King County Council is expected to vote on a mammoth, $1.1 billion sewer project, including a $400 million state-of-the-art sewage-treatment plant north of Lake Washington. They will do this despite years of warnings from scientists that the new plant is not needed and that advanced sewage treatment will be a waste of millions. But when science clashes with public opinion, science usually loses. And it may be happening again amid the labyrinthian sewers of Puget Sound. County officials insist the project is necessary - if only because state and federal laws require it, and because taxpayers want it. Judging by a 1997 county opinion poll, they're right: People demand that Puget Sound be cleaned up and are willing to pay for it. But many scientists say secondary treatment does not significantly improve water quality in the oxygen-rich currents of central Puget Sound. They cite a 1993 study by the prestigious National Academy of Science that concluded secondary treatment is critical for landlocked areas but that for seaport cities like Seattle, it amounts to environmental overkill. http:l/www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 2 of 10 Alan Mearns, a biologist and an expert on marine pollution, worked on that study and wishes county officials would read it. "Just take a little time to educate yourself before you spend all that money on high-level treatment," he pleads. Even better, the county should look at what ratepayers got for their new, $575 million secondary-treatment plant at West Point, he says. After three years of operation, officials concede they can't point to any resulting improvement in Puget Sound's water quality. Still, backers of the new secondary-treatment plant remain adamant. "People don't want sewage in Puget Sound," says County Councilman Larry Phillips, who chairs the committee that recently approved the plan. "Unless the study recommended going to secondary treatment, I probably would not read it." Adds Don Theiler, manager of the county Wastewater Treatment Division: "I support secondary treatment. This department supports it. Everybody who lives on Puget Sound supports it." And soon everybody will begin paying for it - as much as $26 per month added to sewer bills over the next 35 years. At $1.1 billion, the "regional wastewater services plan" will be one of the costliest capital projects in local history. It calls for nearly $700 million in new sewer pipes and other technology, plus the new treatment plant at an undetermined site north of Lake Washington. That is more than the combined cost of both new sports stadiums. And these costs can't be foisted onto hotel bills or rental cars. Yet, to date, the only squabbling has been over where the new plant should be built. For policymakers, staff, most media and even many scientists, the need for advanced sewage treatment is an article of faith. With salmon runs dwindling throughout the region, cleaning up Puget Sound, area lakes and rivers is a high priority. You gotta do what you gotta do. And environmental laws seem to leave little question what King County has to do. http://www.seaflletimes.com/ 1/20199 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 3 of 10 By the early 1970s, Americans were outraged by the pollution of their lakes, rivers and bays. The Great Lakes were turning into cesspools. Ohio's Cuyahoga River was so polluted it actually caught fire. Most cities, including Seattle, had primary treatment, which uses screens and settling tanks to remove solids, grit, scum and debris from effluent. The 1972 Clean Water Act, marked as the first big victory for the environmental movement, required all cities to add secondary treatment, a biological process that uses bacteria to consume biodegradable material in the effluent before returning it to the environment. And Congress promised to pay 75 percent of the costs, which, for a while, it did. As a result, more than $76 billion has been spent on new or expanded sewage treatment around the nation. For most cities, the returns have been dramatic. Dozens of rivers have been cleaned up, and the Great Lakes are greatly improved. The Seattle area had been struggling over its sewers for years. Lake Washington had become so polluted by the 1950s that lakeshore communities organized a regional consortium called Metro to construct a sewer system around the lake, diverting waste water to primary treatment plants in Magnolia and Renton. For many years, Metro officials resisted secondary treatment, arguing that it cost millions more to build and operate, while consuming more energy and water. Then, as now, the argument was that the technology needed to clean up Lake Erie or Lake Washington may not be needed in Puget Sound. Here's why: Primary-treated sewage is made up mostly of water, with less than one-tenth of 1 percent suspended solids, organic matter and traces of other contaminants, mostly phosphorus and nitrogen. In a confined body of water, those so-called "nutrients" essentially overfertilize the water, encouraging the growth of tiny organisms that, in turn, consume too much oxygen and degrade the water quality. That's what happened to Lake Washington in the 1950s and to isolated bays in south Puget Sound in the 1970s and 1980s. http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1120/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 4 of 10 1980s. For those bodies of water, the solution was secondary treatment, in which bacteria consume and digest much of the biodegradable solids. But central Puget Sound is different, Mearns and others argue. It contains about 1 trillion cubic meters of water. Massive tides flush the system twice per day; the daily outflow from Puget Sound is twice that of the Columbia River. As a result, all that phosphorus and nitrogen are quickly diluted - 1 to 100 within seconds, 1 to 1,000 within minutes. For many people, this is no consolation. "It leaves me cold that people say: Don't worry, because it's dispersed," says Kathy Fletcher, of the environmental group People for Puget Sound. 'That's irresponsible." But others insist those nutrients actually fertilize the Sound, providing food for phytoplankton, which feed zooplankton, which feed small fish, which feed bigger fish, and so forth. In fact, the tons of solids removed from sewage, at a cost of millions per year, are recycled into "biosolids" and sold as a valuable fertilizer. County officials proudly report that trees on the popular Mountains-to-Sound Greenway grow much faster when fertilized with their recycled sewage. Treated sewage also contains trace amounts of copper, zinc, lead and other metals that, when concentrated, can have a toxic effect on the environment. Primary treatment removes some of those metals, but secondary removes more than twice as much. In the early years, Metro argued that such pollutants in primary sewage are a tiny fraction of those introduced , from industrial sites, ship traffic and natural sources. Whatever the source, these pollutants are also quickly diluted in Puget Sound. So goes the argument. For a time, the federal government agreed. Metro was given a waiver from secondary treatment. But in the early '80s, the public became alarmed by hftp://www,seaftletimes.com/ 1/20/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 5 of 10 But in the early '80s, the public became alarmed by Puget Sound pollution. Scores of shellfish beds were closed in the south Sound. Several gray whales washed up on Northwest beaches, dead from unknown causes. Bottom fish were found with tumors caused by feeding in poisoned sediments. The health of Puget Sound became an issue in the 1984 election. Under growing public pressure, the state passed new Puget Sound protections. People demanded that King County upgrade its sewage treatment. Metro relented and promised to build a new secondary-treatment plant. 'Whether we needed it or not' Essentially, politics prevailed over science, recalls Gordon Gabrielson, the retired former manager of Metro's West Point plant. "We knew that we weren't doing any harm to the Sound, because that's what all the scientists told us. So I went along with the decision to build it, whether we needed it or not." Many scientists were astounded by the decision, recalls Lincoln Loehr, an oceanographer who works as an environmental analyst for a Seaftle law firm. A petition, signed by 30 of the top oceanographers and biologists at the University of Washington, warned that secondary treatment would be a waste of money. One of those scientists was Alan Mearns, the soft- spoken biologist who specializes in water pollution at the Seattle office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration at Sand Point. "We were trying to say: Let's think about how we're spending public funds," he recalls. "Let's see which strategies result in benefits, and which don't. And the scientific evidence suggested that secondary would not get us results." For public officials, it is relatively easy to build sewage , projects, adds Loehr, because they can be financed without raising taxes. Local utilities simply raise sewer fees and spread the costs among thousands of ratepayers. Everybody-the Microsoft millionaire or the welfare mom - pays, and nobody has any choice. So, three years ago, Metro opened the valves on its brand new secondary-treatment plant at West Point. The http://www.seaftletimes.com/ 1/20199 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 6 of 10 brand new secondary-treatment plant at West Point. The price tag was about $575 million; with interest on the debt, the ultimate cost will be well over $1 billion. 'The message was clear' Even before that plant was finished, voters decided to merge King County and Metro, which was already planning the next stage of secondary treatment. "Expanding West Point did not add capacity," explains Christie True, a program manager in the county Wastewater Division. "We needed to make long-term decisions to prepare for the future." The effort focused on fast-growing suburbs in north King and south Snohomish counties, much of which are hooked to King County sewers. Sewage from that area is piped as far as 13 miles to the Renton plant for treatment, and those pipes are nearly at capacity, True said. The Wastewater Division prepared a set of alternatives. The county could expand the existing plants, or spend several hundred million dollars more to build a new one up north. The idea of obtaining a federal waiver and not adding secondary treatment was never on the table. "We went out and interviewed community leaders;" True says. "And the message was clear: Water quality is a high priority. Don't reopen past decisions. Don't consider costs." In the 1997 poll, large majorities said they viewed Puget Sound pollution as a major problem and said they would pay higher sewer rates to prevent it. However, those polled were never told there is any debate over the environmental benefits of secondary treatment. Last year, County Executive Ron Sims came out with his preferred plan: Upgrade and expand the sewer system and build new storage tanks to prevent storm-related overflows - improvements that nobody contests. And he called for a new secondary-treatment plant, pumping the effluent across the North End to a new outfall about six miles away near Richmond Beach. http://www.seafletimes.comf 1/20/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 7 of 10 Costs would be spread among all ratepayers, plus a stiff surcharge for new hookups. For some ratepayers, that would mean a relatively modest rate increase of about $2.50, True says. But County Council member Maggi Fimia warns that the surcharge will boost sewer rates for new homes or businesses by as much as $26 per month. Flexibility urged Meanwhile, the same federal government that required secondary treatment was helping pay for a three-year study by the National Academy of Science. That 430- page report concludes the Clean Water Act can lead to overprotection in coastal areas. While researchers did not address Puget Sound specifically, they urged that federal laws be made Flexible enough to allow for geographical differences, because advanced treatment may not be necessary at all in the deep, tidal waters of the Pacific Coast. As a result, more than 40 Western communities including San Diego and Orange County, Calif., and the state of Hawaii have obtained waivers from the Clean Water Act. "The problem with the Clean Water Act is that the U.S. is not a homogenous place," says Elaine Brooks, a plankton researcher who spent 20 years at the prestigious Scripps marine research institution outside San Diego. 'What worked well for Cleveland or Chicago turns out to be a tremendous waste of money in San Diego or Seattle." As in Seattle, secondary treatment had enormous public support in San Diego, Brooks says. Environmental groups filed suit to force the issue, but the courts ultimately ruled that San Diego didn't need secondary. Sound 'is not the ocean' King County officials reject any comparison with Southern California. "Puget Sound is not the ocean," says Don Theiler, the waste-water manager. "I don't think even the best scientists can know with any certainty the effects of discharging primary effluent." He and other officials acknowledge they never conferred with California sewage authorities and never considered http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 8 of 10 with California sewage authorities and never considered requesting a waiver. ' In fact, Mearns and other critics say Puget Sound has stronger currents for dilution, and far more oxygen for natural treatment of sewage than the waters off Southern California. "The evidence suggests that Puget Sound has tremendous depth and tidal action," says Blake Anderson, an environmental engineer at Cal Poly Pomona who worked on the Academy of Sciences study. And the negligible benefits of advanced treatment, he adds, may well be offset by the costs -not just dollars, but also neighborhood impacts and the additional use of water and energy. Randy Shuman, an oceanographer who monitors water quality for King County, stresses that secondary treatment has reduced pollutants going into the Sound from sewage by up to 75 percent, based on monitoring at the West Point plant. But has that really made much difference in the overall health of Puget Sound? A state monitoring program reports that Puget Sound water quality has been improving steadily for many years. But scientists differ over whether that improvement can be attributed to secondary sewage treatment. -We can't detect a difference' Once a month, Shuman and otherstest the waters at the West Point outfall, but they frequently have trouble finding any trace of the effluent "plume," he says. And he concedes: 'We can't reliably detect a difference since secondary." This is because the outfall is in an ideal location, he ' says-240 feet deep and 3,600 feet from the shore in the middle of powerful currents. At the bottom end is the "diffuser' -600 feet of pipe riddled with 200 holes about 4 1/2 inches round -which ensures that the effluent mixes quickly with sea water. Incoming saltwater from the Pacific tends to flow south near the bottom, because saltwater is heavier than fresh water. The ouffall is strategically placed so that most of http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 9 of 10 water. The outfall is strategically placed so that most of the effluent enters the outgoing, northbound currents. Still, Shuman feels better about reducing the amount of nutrients and other pollutants in the effluent. "I don't believe a wrong decision was made," he says. "I would say the science were putting together suggests that it is not obvious that secondary was a waste of money. . . . "For now, we have a job to do, and it is not a trivial thing to challenge the Clean Water Act. Is that really what we want to do?" 'Dare not talk about it' Probably not. There is no groundswell, even among scientists, to give up on secondary treatment. Mearns and Loehr have spoken up at County Council meetings, but theirs have been lonely voices for some 15 years. Others are reluctant to speak up. Gabrielson, the former West Point manager, says many of his former colleagues - engineers and scientists alike - still believe secondary treatment is a huge waste of money. "But they dare not talk about it because they think it would jeopardize their jobs," he says. "I'm retired, so can talk about it." It's not so much fear as the nature of scientists, adds Jack Word, a biologist at Battelle who has worked with sewage treatment in Puget Sound and Southern California. "Is secondary worth the money? Probably not. But scientists can't say that with certainty. A policy maker reaches a point where he has to make a decision. But science is never finished. So you try not to be on one side or the other of an issue, so other people can make those decisions." The billion-dollar sewer plan may not be a done deal. Council members Fimia and Louise Miller, both from north county districts, have heard from constituents who don't want a sewage plant in their back yards. Fimia and Miller prefer one of the less-costly options, which would hltp://www.seaffletimes.com/ 1/20199 Seattle Times: Search Results Page 10 of 10 Miller prefer one of the less-costly options, which would expand one or both of the existing treatment plants at ' Renton or West Point -far from their districts. "As I see it, each of the strategies gives you the same sewage capacity, so what is the additional benefit of spending hundreds of millions for a North End plant?" Fimia asks. Once again, the issue is not science but public opinion. And North End opinion says: Go ahead and build it. . . . Somewhere else. 4 Search Again Ross Anderson's phone number is 206-464-2061. Browse by Me .._ .._ __............._... —_.—......_...... Halkginggd and HeiAt(•.d Into. � King CounNs fle91ona1 Westewa�er_g m�ce�Plan FREE Click here llle Early Bird gets the... POCO COMBO for details t Cl91slrced Ads YNlOWN CODytlghl O 1999 The Se Me I mes_CoW5_ http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99 a Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 24, 1999 o�NS ANITgl� 723. O� 2 � � c 9 O y ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OCSOe P.O.Box 8127* Fountain Valley,CA 927284127 0 (71{)992-2411 Minutes for Board Meeting a 02/24/99 Page 2 of 6 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on February 24, 1999, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry A Peter Green Dave Garofalo A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan - Thomas E. Lutz X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F. Walker X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith A Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Petennan; Doug Stewart; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; John Linder, Chuck Winsor, Ryal Wheeler OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Conrad Hohener; Warren Parchan Minutes for Board Meeting 02/24/99 p Page 3of6 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Eva Miner-Bradford for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair discussed the Steering Committee Retreat held on February 20. Topics for discussion at the retreat were organization issues and direction of the agency. Chair Debay also reported that the Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee would be meeting on March 10 to review the recommendations of staff and a special consultant who are reviewing proposals regarding inflow and infiltration. The Committee will report their findings to the OMITS Committee and the full Board in April. A special Directors'Workshop is scheduled for Saturday, March 13, to review groundwater reclamation issues as it relates to the strategic plan. The FAHR Committee will also be holding a special workshop on Saturday,April 10, to discuss proposed changes to the connection fee structure, and all Directors were encouraged to attend. The Directors were then requested to complete a survey questionnaire included in their meeting folders regarding Board meeting start times. Any change it the meeting time will be announced prior to the March Board meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 27, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/99 10 /31/99 Totals $4,255,454.52 $3,728,740.45 Director Mark Leyes abstained. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 9. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the February 24, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 27, 1999 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting 02/24/99 Page 4 of 6 10. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the February 4, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 4, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Olsson Construction, Inc. d. MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Ocean Oudall Reliability Upgrades, Job No.J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003,with Advanco Constructors, Inc., authorizing an addition of $133.279 increasing the total contract amount to$7,753,086; and (2)Accept Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. e. MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 338-1. and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$4,200,000, for a total budget of$10.125,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$109,860, for a total amount not to exceed $626,290. 11. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION,AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Thomas Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the February 10, 1999 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 10, 1999 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1999. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. Minutes for Board Meeting 02/24/99 y Page 5 of 6 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew boiler&machinery insurance for the District for the period March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000, with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $71,286.00. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the independent audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional one-year period, and to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed $42,600. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize an 11.7% equity adjustment to Danny Evangelista's salary to correct the internal and external inequities that exist between Mr. Evangelista's salary and the salaries of other Programmers. In. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year Report for the Quarter ended December 31, 1998. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance technical assistance to complete embedded systems assessment, reparation, and testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999. Director Mark Murphy abstained. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize payment of$10,400 to EK Development Corporation for a second month's additional payment in connection with the option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kern County. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and award Sewer Line Cleaning Agreement to Hoffman Southwest Corp. dba Professional Pipe Services for the cleaning of approximately 175 miles of small diameter sewer lines in Revenue Area 7, for Sewer Line Cleaning, Specification No. M-062, for an amount not to exceed $227,115.00 for a one-year period with option for two one-year renewal periods. 13. Warren Parchan of Secured Property Management was recognized who spoke to the Directors regarding his request to waive or reduce residential capital facilities connection fees in connection with a senior citizen apartment project in the City of Placentia. After discussion among the Directors, it was: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file letter submitted by Secured Property Management dated February 15, 1999; (2) Receive and file memo from General Counsel dated February 12, 1999; and (3) Deny the request of Secured Property Management to waive or reduce residential capital facilities connection fees. Director Norm Eckenrode abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting v 02/24/99 Page 6 of 6 14, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Reject all bids; and (4)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid). 15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve out-of-country travel by Jane Tran to attend the Printed Circuit Board Wastewater Technologies Conference being held in Taiwan to present her technical paper, for one week in March 1999; and all travel, lodging, registration and per diem costs to be paid by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Find that the following matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed for an existing sewer easement located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and a subsidiary of Unocal Corporation, in a forth approved by General Counsel. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 7:45 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1) and 16(a)(3). No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 16(a)(2). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 16(a)(4), and no report was given. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 8:15 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. There were no actions taken during the closed session that must be reported out at this time. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. ecretary of Board of" irectors of Orange Cou Sanllatl District Wadon\dalal\wp.cftMagendalBoard MinNes\1999 Board MinNm\022499doc Claims Paid From IM199 to 111W119 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 16473 Brown And Caldwell 8 121,457.75 Engineering Services P1-37 16474 Canus Corporation 88,737.67 Fiber Optic Cable 16475 Carollo Engineers 39,229.47 Engineering Services P1-36&P2-42 16476 CH2MHill 94,470.58 Engineering Services J-31-3 16477 Dell Marketing L.P. 61.039.32 10 Dell Computer Workstations&9 Dell Notebook Computers 16478 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 81,090.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 16479 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 72,488.10 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 16480 Intergraph Corporation 36,732.58 Software J-42 16481 Parsons Engineering Science 117,06.18 Engineering Services J-42 16482 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 82,305.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16483 Science Applications In6.,Corp. 40.507.62 Ocean Monitoring MO6-8-94 16484 Southern California Edison 46.243.00 Power 16485 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 67,155.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16486 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 76,030.20 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 16487 First Fire Systems,Inc. 63.826.28 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25.98 16488 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 138,209.73 Construction 7-17 16489 Margate Construction,Inc. 209,211.00 Construction PI-36-2 16490 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 227.319.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 r�r 16491 The Vantage Group LLC 1,830.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project y 16492 AT&T 25.89 Long Distance Telephone Services 16493 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.85 Long Distance Telephone Services 16494 American Telephone&Telegraph 477.31 Long Distance Telephone Services 16495 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 594.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16496 Airborne Express 54.00 Air Freight 16497 Allied Supply Company 4,075.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16498 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 144.58 Instrument Supplies 16499 American Airlines 1,870.00 Travel Services 16500 Anixter, Inc. 247.93 Computer Supplies 16501 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 696.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 16502 Appleone Employment Service 10.768.29 Temporary Employment Services 16503 Annor-Vac 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16504 Audio Video Reporting Services 139.31 Audio Video Services 16505 Awards&Trophies By Bea 78.33 Plaques 16506 Azur Environmental 1,250.19 Lab Supplies 16507 Assoc.of Metro. Sewerage Agencies 475.00 Meeting Registration 16508 ASR Analysis 1,200.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1 16509 AWSI 229.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 16510 Baker Process 12.935.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16511 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,625.20 Telephone Installation Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16612 Battery Specialties 110.07 Batteries 16513 Belisle&Associates 150.80 Publications 16514 Bernardo Press 157.85 Publications 16515 Bio Gro Division 17,566.48 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 16516 Black Box Corporation 275.04 Computer Supplies 16517 Brinderson Corp 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 16518 Bristol Systems, Inc. 11.012.08 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 16519 Burke Engineering Co. 91579 Electrical Supplies 16520 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,91200 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 16521 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 91 15 Rope 16522 Calif Centrifugal Pump 5.67600 Pump Supplies 16523 California Automatic Gate 2.15756 Service Agreement 16524 California Relorafion Services 312.00 Moving Services 16525 Calolympic Safety 17.97 Safety Supplies 16526 CalTrans-Publicafion Unit 92.00 Publications 16527 Center for Effective Performance,Inc. 110.00 Office Supplies 16628 Charles King Company, Inc. 4,472.43 Construction 541-1 VW 16529 Charles P.Crowley Co. 641.55 Instrument Parts ri 16530 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,N.A. 10.502.00 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP r'* 16531 Chrome Crankshaft Co. 1.015.00 Pump Supplies b 16532 Cole Scientific 208.23 Lab Services Ni 16533 Communication Briefings 89.00 Publications 16534 Compuserve Incorporated 24.95 Computer Services 16635 Computers America, Inc. 1.804.42 Computer Supplies 16536 Connell GM Parts 10.51 Truck Supplies 16537 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,555.14 Electrical Supplies 16538 Consolidated Plastics Company 21.60 Welding Equipment&Supplies 16539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 204.90 Plumbing Supplies 16540 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9,071.83 Engine Supplies 16541 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 16542 Corporate Express Imaging 306.05 Computer Supplies 16543 Corporate Express 749.89 Office Supplies 16544 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 1,775.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 16545 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 54.68 Truck Parts 16546 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1.649.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16547 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4.843.61 Electrical Supplies 16548 Crane Pro Services 5,049.44 Maintenance Agreement 16549 CHEMetrics, Inc. 26.12 Lab Supplies 16550 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 470.00 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer 16551 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 159.47 Lab Supplies Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1/15199 Warrant No. vendor Amount Description 16552 CR&R Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 16553 D B Sales 7,973.50 Electrical Supplies 16554 Dapper Tire Co. 2,508.97 Truck Tires 16555 Del Mar Analytical 380.00 Biosolids Analysis 16556 Dover Elevator Company 2,925.30 Elevator Maintenance 16557 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 699.13 Paint Supplies 16558 DMG-Maximus 15,960.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit 16559 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 16660 Enterprise Technologies 8,588.00 Consulting Services-PIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project 16561 Environmental Resources Associates 910.20 Lab Services 16562 Environmental Data Solutions Group 9,800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into. Mgmt.Sys.Implementation Project 16563 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.302.12 Professional Services-Legislative 16564 ESP Industries.Inc. 1.084.87 Mechanical Supplies 16565 Federal Express Corp. 261.80 Air Freight 16566 Filter Supply Company 468.73 Fillers 16567 FirstAmerican Real Estate Solutions 136.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription 16568 Fisher Scientific 533.62 Lab Supplies 16569 Flickinger Company 151.59 Valve 16570 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 8.102.60 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium r�r 16571 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 139.50 Truck Wash Tickets q 16572 Franklin Covey 340.51 Training Registration&Office Supplies w 18573 Fred Pryor Seminars 469.00 Training Registration 16574 Fry's Electronics 1,532.06 Computer Supplies 16575 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.615.11 Lumber/Hardware 16576 GTE California 1,087.16 Telephone Services 16577 Government Insglutes, Inc. 392.00 Publications 16578 Grace Huener 1.800.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation 16579 W W Grainger,Inc. 273.15 Compressor Supplies 16580 Graybar Electric Company 1,863.81 Electrical Supplies 16581 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 380.73 Janitorial Supplies 16582 GLI International, Inc. 1,844.64 Instrument Supplies 16583 Harbour Engineering Group 19,131.89 Pump Supplies 16584 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4.014.67 Truck Supplies 18585 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Dell 134.95 Catering Services 16586 Highway Products 5,114.28 Tool Boxes 16587 Hilti,Inc. 946.01 Tools 18588 The Holman Group 731.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium 16589 Hopkins Technical Products 248.74 Pump Supplies 16590 Horizon Technology 154.62 Lab Supplies 16591 How Magazine 34.96 Subscription Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16592 Hub Auto Supply 268.44 Truck Parts 16593 City of Huntington Beach 13.260.83 Water Use 16594 Hydrotex 1,749.82 Lube Oil 16595 HWA Sales, Inc. 3,252.76 Electdwl Supplies 16596 Imaging Plus, Inc. 630.51 Office Supplies 16597 Impulse 170.61 Mechanical Supplies 16598 Industrial Steam 438.46 Electrical Supplies 16599 Infilco Degremont Inc. 159.10 Mechanical Parts 16600 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service 16601 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 107.52 Lab Supplies 16602 Irvine Ranch Water District 17.82 Water Use 16603 IBM Corporation 3.912.12 Service Contract 16604 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 16605 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.684.10 Safety Supplies 16806 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 772.74 Instrument Supplies 16607 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 4.685.25 Training Expenses 16608 Jay's Catering 217.37 Catering Services y 16609 Jensen Instruments Co. 657.79 Gauge `T 16610 Johnstone Supply 767.16 Electrical Supplies rah 16611 JTA Factors 688.75 Business Forms-Checks b 16612 K.P. Lindstrom 5,750.00 Emir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 n 16613 Kembon Pacific,Inc. 7,697.96 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 16614 Kennedy Hydraulics 343.79 Motor Repairs 16615 Kimmede Bros., Inc. 580.96 Mechanical Parts 16616 Knox Industrial Supplies 1.068.60 Tools 16617 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 328.81 Safety Supplies 16618 Lee&Ro,Inc. 19,412.52 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 16619 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1.999.13 Cellular Telephone Service 16620 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.218.33 Welding Supplies 16621 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 180.93 Tools 16622 Medlin Controls Co. 4.620.44 Instrument Supplies 16623 Mesa Muffler 100.81 Truck Supplies 16624 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves 16625 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 3,578.66 HP LaserJet 8100DN Printer 16626 Mid-West Associates 6,208.60 Pump Supplies 16627 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,750.00 Mechanical Repairs 16628 Milfironics, Inc. 462.92 Electrical Supplies 16629 Mission Uniform Service 589.78 Uniform Rentals 16630 Montgomery Hardware Company 774.00 Door-Plant 2 Maint.Bldg. 16631 MotoPhoto 3.60 Photographic Services Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16632 MPS Photographic Services,Inc. 14.01 Photographic Services 16633 National Plant Services, Inc. 4,500.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16634 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 28.04 Publications 8 Books 16635 Voided Check - - 16636 Neal Supply Co. 1,005.20 Plumbing Supplies 16637 Newark Electronics 33.00 Instrument Supplies 16638 City of Newport Beach 59.98 Water Use 16639 Nextel Communications 1,154.45 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time 16640 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,504.81 Lubricant/Dlesel Fuel 16641 The Norco Companies 92.00 Mail Delivery Service 16642 NRDC Publications Department 13.75 Publication 16643 Office Depot Business Services 2,928.36 Office Supplies 16644 The Ohmart Corporation 516.26 Instrument Supplies 16645 Olympus America, Inc. 13,430.61 Videoimagescope 8 Accessories 16646 Oracle Education 3,333.00 Training Registration 16647 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,455.55 Electrical Supplies 16648 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1,347.20 Fittings 16649 Oxygen Service Company 2,391.83 Specialty Gases r' 16650 OCB Reprographics 248.20 Printing Service-Spec P-173 r�r 16651 Pacific Bell 36.13 Telephone Services y 16652 Pacific Mechanical Supply 114.99 Plumbing Supplies yr 16653 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 278.32 Instrument Supplies 16654 Pacificare of Ca. 24,889.48 Health Insurance Premium 16655 Paco/Johnston Pump 361.96 Pump Supplies 16656 Padre Janitorial Supplies 64.65 Janitorial Supplies 16657 Pagenet 1,671.84 Rental Equipment 16658 Parts Unlimited 223.03 Truck Supplies 16659 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 189.90 Filters 16660 Pitney Bowes 2,240.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 16661 Pohydyne,Inc. 4,568.19 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16662 Power Probe 1,739.65 Electro Brake Bleeder w/Adaptors 16663 Prosum Information Technologies 2,923.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development 16664 Reliastar 8,048.00 Life Insurance Premium 16665 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,167.72 Life Insurance Premium 16666 RM Controls 256.93 Instrument Supplies 16667 RPM Electric Motors 12.966.61 Electric Motor Repair 16668 Safelite Glass Corp. 308.45 Auto Supplies 16669 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,774.74 Mechanical Supplies 16670 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment 16671 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 639.99 Specialty Gases Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16672 Sears 150.83 Mechanical Supplies 16673 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,344.99 Tools/Hardware 16674 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 12,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 16675 Skalar, Inc. 209.00 Pump Supplies 16676 SkillPath Seminars 399.00 Training Registration 16677 Snap-On Incorporated 32.37 Tools 16678 Southern California Water 56.55 Water Use 16679 Sparkletts 1,649.60 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 16680 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co. 93.52 Pump Supplies 16681 Stama Cells,Inc. 195.04 Lab Supplies 16682 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals 16683 Summit Steel 107.24 Metal 16684 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals 16685 Taylor-Dunn 30.08 Electric Can Parts 16686 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,068.98 Mechanical Supplies 16687 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services �I 16688 Tomell 8 Cotton 325.90 Legal Services 16689 Troemner,Inc. 766.78 Lab Equipment Calibration Services 16690 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 538.74 Truck Supplies rr 16691 TEKsystems 2.915.00 Temporary Employment Services Y 16692 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Lab Water Purification System Maint. ON 16693 The Unisource Corporation 6,361.58 Paper Supplies 16694 United Parcel Service 959.27 Parcel Services 16695 Valcum 11,284.98 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses 16696 Valley Cities Supply Company 917.08 Plumbing Supplies 16697 Verne's Plumbing 250.00 Plumbing Supplies 16698 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,394.10 Vision Service Premium 16699 Vortex Corp. 287.97 Door Repair 16700 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 9,589.14 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 16701 VWR Scientific Products 6,499.11 Lab Supplies 16702 Waxie Sanitary Supply 382.41 Janitorial Supplies 16703 Wayne Electric Co. 816.21 Electrical Supplies 16704 Weather Services International 3,459.00 Computer Software Service-Windows 18705 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 703.61 Safety Supplies 16706 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 1,992.40 Electrical Supplies 16707 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 15,581.74 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 16708 Wdeg Scientific 1.056.11 Lab Supplies 16709 Xerox Corporation 10,960.27 Copier Leases 16710 YCA 8 Associates 6.360.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees 16711 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications Page 6 of 9 '• vt Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16712 CNA Trust 8.447.80 Construction 5-41-1 16713 Blake Anderson 206.17 Cellular Expense Reimb. 16714 Rick J.Hannappel 557.00 Training Expense Reimb. 16715 County of Orange 2,235.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16716 Orange County Sanitation District 996.88 Petty Cash Reimb. 16717 Orange County Sanitation District 394,165.03 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 16718 WCO Hotels,Inc. 48.739.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16719 Aerochem,Inc. 5.10503 Reconol,aeon User Fee Refund 16720 Aluminum Forge 1,93698 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16721 Court Order 45515 Wage Garnishment 16722 Boeing North American 10771 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16723 Buena Park Community Hospital 66749 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16724 Cadillac Plating 501.96 Reconahation User Fee Refund 16725 Century Laminators#1 1,237.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16726 Claim Jumper Restaurant 549.56 DART Luncheon Expense 16727 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment r.� 16728 Columbia West Anaheim Medical 13.034.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund cam. 16729 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 56.20 Plumbing Supplies 16730 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment r�r 16731 CSMFO-1999 Annual Conference 665.00 Seminar Registration b 16732 Delru Co. 186.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund �+ 16733 Details,Inc. 897.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16734 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 16735 Dunham Metal Processing 761.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16735 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 16737 Gunther Athletic Service 509.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16738 Hardly Able Oil Company 203.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16739 Hinckley and Schmitt 1,487.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16740 Huntington Beach Conv.Hospital 1,867.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16741 Imperial Containers&Display 173.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16742 Intercem 263.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16743 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 16744 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction 16745 ICN Biomedicals 849.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16746 J.R.O.Operations Trust 230.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16747 Kaynar Mfg. Div.of Kaynar Tech. 2,085.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16748 Key Circuit Co. 2.346.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16749 Kinsbursky Brothers Supply,Inc. 75A6 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16750 Kryler Corporation 350.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund - 16751 KCA Electronics,Inc. 2,751.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16752 La Palma Intercommunity Hospital 2,465.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16753 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 51.16 Safety Supplies 16754 Lacey Custom Linens 131.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16755 LDR 123.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16756 Matrix Circuits, Inc. 410.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16757 Metal Technology,Inc. 780AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16758 Micrometals, Inc.#2 2.441.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16759 Monarch Precision Deburring Co. 362.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16750 Murrietta Circuits 1,184.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16761 Nutrilite Products, Inc. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16762 Omni Metal Finishing 1.757.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16763 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 16764 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 16765 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 234.91 Fittings 16766 OCEA 606.36 Dues Deduction 16767 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 337.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16768 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 16769 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 16770 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction rt 16771 Polydad Laminates, Inc. 330.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund q 18772 Ricoh Electronics 1.063.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund a 16773 Ristorante Mamma Gina 50.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16774 REG Transport Dynamics 292.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16775 Semicoa 183.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16776 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,065.26 Tools/Hardware 16777 Sodn Biomedical 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16778 Speedy Circuits 236.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16779 State of California 136.04 Wage Garnishment 16780 Taormina Industries,Inc.#4 345.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16781 Tayco Engineering 4.495.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16782 Thermco Systems,Inc. 1,808.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16783 U.S. Filter Corporation 286.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16784 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 314.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16785 Union Foods 1,238.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16786 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions 16787 Universal Circuits,Inc. 2.210.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16788 UOP P0#15224613 1,384.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16789 US Postal Service 505.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16790 US Postal Service 232.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16791 Val Circuits#5 1,368.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 8 of 9 4 s, Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16792 Valet Car Wash 531.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16793 Willamette Industries, Inc. 3,079.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,773,595.75 Payroll Disbursements 12375-12379 Employee Paychecks $ 106,287.29 Severance Payoffs 12380-12520 - Employee Paychecks 183.686.27 Biweekly Payroll 1113/99 12521-12522 Employee Paychecks 1,688.02 Termination&Payroll Adjustment 12523-12544 Directors'Paychecks 5.248.64 Payroll 1/13199 12545-12645 Employee Paychecks 1,377.58 Reissue Voided Auto Deposit 34202-34644 Direct Deposit Statements 617,134.66 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 916,322.46 Wire Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 151,579.61 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 226,958.62 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits rn State Street Bank&Trust 187,998.08 January Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series C Certificate of Deposits �C Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 568,536.31 w P Total Claims Paid 1/1199-1/15199 $ 4,255,454.52 Y e Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 16794 Anna L. Piercy $ 340.00 Director Travel Advance 16795 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 45,803.60 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 16796 Carollo Engineers 29,724.67 Engineering Services Pi-36&P242 16797 Cummins Cal Pacific, Inc. 124,720.63 (2)200 KW Emergency Generators w/Trallers 16798 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 76,704.15 Engineering Services 241 16799 James Martin&Co. 108,682.50 Data Integration Project 16800 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 144,035.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95 16801 Orange County Water District 42.595.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 16802 Pacificare of Ca. 33,622.26 Health Insurance Premium 16803 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 170.031.19 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16804 Polydyne, Inc. 39.011.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3A1-92 16805 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 35,025.23 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 16806 Southern California Edison 31.441.69 Power 16807 SPEC Services, Inc. 96,434.92 Engineering Services J-33-1 16808 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 92,467.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16809 United HealthCare 129.809.32 Medical Health Insurance 16810 Valcom 29.781.35 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses p 16811 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 73,691.92 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 M 16812 Water Environment Research Foundation 69,000.00 Membership 16813 Western States Chemical, Inc. 26,827.64 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 16814 The Vantage Group LLC 24,880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 16815 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.82 Long Distance Telephone Services 16816 American Telephone&Telegraph 2,106.01 Long Distance Telephone Services 16817 American Telephone&Telegraph 21.08 Long Distance Telephone Services 16818 AccuStandard 529.88 Lab Supplies 16819 Airgas Lyons Safety 310.42 Safety Supplies 16820 American Society of Civil Engineers' 2.254.50 Registration 16821 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 545.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 16822 Appleone Employment Service 11,746.28 Temporary Employment Services 16823 Applied Industrial Technology 662.13 Pump Supplies 16824 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies 16825 Annor-Vac 1,105.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16826 Arrs Disposal Service,Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 16827 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement 16828 Awards&Trophies By Bea 148.37 Plaques 18829 Azur Environmental 762.63 Lab Supplies 16830 ABM Business Machines.Inc. 1,1'13.06 Once Supplies 16831 ACT Group Inc. 487.13 Service Agreement 16832 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.592.81 Consulting Services 11-20 Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Wammt No. Vendor Amount Description 16833 American Compensation Assoc. 930.00 Registration 16834 ARK Technologies 14.212.00 Data Processing 16835 Battery Specialties 1.386.36 Batteries 16836 Bic Gro Division 17,D48.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 16837 BioSource Consulting 11,553.73 Consulting Servicee-Biosolids&Watershed 16838 Boyle Engineering Corporation 15,924.94 Engineering Services 7-27 16839 Brinderson Corp 5W.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 16840 Bristol Systems, Inc. 6.150.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 16841 Bush&Associates, Inc. 11,090.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 16842 Business Objects Americas 4.972.85 Software-Data WhseAnlergration Project 16843 Business Week 37.95 Subscription 16844 BuyComp 22,908.48 Computer Supplies- 10 Network Switches 16845 BBR Surveying Instruments 111.40 Instrument Supplies 16846 CWEA 45.00 Membership 16647 Calolympic Safety 1,988.95 Safety Supplies 16848 Camali Corp 4.562.50 Service Agreement 16849 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 6,034.15 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-2 16850 Career Track Seminars MS2 696.00 Seminar Registration 16851 Centrepointe Commercial Inlerlors 583.88 Office Fumiture N 16852 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,444.45 Professional Services-Ergonomic 16853 Color Ads, Inc. 530.00 Vehicle Decals 16854 Compressor Components Of Calif 6,141.75 Pump Supplies 16855 Computers America,Inc. 3,020.87 Computer Supplies 16856 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 478.46 Electrical Supplies 16857 Consolidated Plastics Company 95.40 Welding Equipment&Supplies 16858 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 226.14 Plumbing Supplies 16659 Converse Consultants 1,128.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 16860 Cooper Cameron Corporation 650.00 Engine Supplies 16861 Corporate Express Imaging 369.80 Computer Supplies 16862 Corporate Express 599.42 Office Supplies 16863 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 16864 Cost Containment Solutions 702.56 Worker's Comp. Services 16865 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 46.14 Truck Parts 16866 County of Orange 74.57 Administrative Fees 16867 County of Orange 595.00 Permit Fees 16868 County of Orange 1,335.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16869 County Wholesale Electric Co. 32.16 Electrical Supplies 16870 Crane Pro Services 11,308.94 Maintenance Agreement 16871 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 16872 Cytec Industries, Inc. 15,477.66 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 1M6t99 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16873 CASA 205.00 Conference Registration 16874 CEPA Company 1.010.00 Equipment Maint.Service 16875 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 124.52 Lab Supplies 16876 CR&R, Inc. 2,205.00 Container Rentals 16877 CSMFO 40.00 Registration 18878 CWFA 115.00 Registration 16879 Dapper Tire Co. 80103 Truck Tires 16880 Datavault 21900 Oesue Back-Up Tape Storage 16881 DataCard Services 459 17 Egwpn,ent Maint 16882 David's Tree Service 45000 Tree Removal 16883 De Guelle&Sons Glass Co. 10633 Safety Glass 16884 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1.22400 Surveying Services MO 6.8.94 16885 DTSC 192.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 16886 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 74.00 Medical Screening 16867 Edison EV 7,100.48 EV Charging Station Installation 16888 Electra Bond, Inc. 1,203.57 Mechanical Supplies 111119 Electro Numerics, Inc. 257.00 Electrical Supplies 16890 Electro-Test, Inc. 904.00 Electrical Supplies 16891 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 n 16892 Enterprise Technologies 11,682.80 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project 16893 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.103.47 Professional Services-Legislative w 16894 FIIeNET Corporation 15.731.51 Computer Software 16895 Fisher Scientific 1,292.00 Lab Supplies 16896 Flo-Systems,Inc. 7,466.98 Pump Supplies 16897 Forked Engineering&Surveying 9,840.00 Engineering Services P-150 16898 Franklin Covey 940.90 Office Supplies 16899 Fry's Electronics 152.89 Computer Supplies 16900 FM International,Inc. 1,000.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 16901 GarraB-Callahan Company 560.30 Chemicals 16902 Gartner Group 395.00 Subscription 16903 Gales Fiberglass Installers 750.00 Fiberglass Repair 16904 GTE California 7.792.46 Telephone Services 16905 George T. Hall Co. 1.494.16 Mechanical Supplies 16906 Global Engineering&Management 3,690.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention 16907 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 16908 Grew Huener 2,430.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation 16909 WW Grainger, Inc. 57.43 Compressor Supplies 16910 Graphic Distributors 691.76 Photographic Supplies 16911 Graseby STI 4.305.07 Engine Supplies 16912 Great American Printing Co. 255.99 Printing Service Page 3 of 9 m Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16913 GE Multilin Inc.(Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair 16914 GS Edwards Systems Technology 315.00 Lab Equipment Repair 16915 GST,Inc.I Micro City 33.84 Office Supplies 16916 GTE Hawaii 190.86 Telephone Services-3 Way Conference Call 16917 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 439.26 Truck Supplies 16918 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 68.00 Catering Services 16919 Home Depot 105.02 Small Hardware 16920 Hub Auto Supply 49.19 Truck Parts 16921 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 3.171.50 Software Licenses 16922 HWA Sales, Inc. 1,586.08 Electrical Supplies 16923 Imaging Plus, Inc. 708.53 Office Supplies 16924 Implemented Designs,Inc. 500.00 IT Computer Room Floor Refurbishing 16925 Impulse 211.74 Lab Supplies 16926 Industrial Air Compressor 286.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16927 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 26.03 Connectors 16928 Information Resources 200.00 Personnel Services 16929 Interstate Battery Systems 501.68 Batteries 16930 Irvine Ranch Water District 54.54 Water Use 16931 IBM Corporation 10,641.33 Service Contract 16932 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.889.27 Safety Supplies 16933 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 22,281.64 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series ,> 16934 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 24,809.25 Misr.Construction Services 16935 Jays Catering 313.18 Catering Services 16936 Jobtrak 108.00 Notices&Ads 16937 Knowledge Point 1.608.75 Software Maint.Agreement 16938 Knox Industrial Supplies 559.36 Tools 16939 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 808.54 Cellular Telephone Service 16940 LaserAll Corp. 1,204A7 Service Agreement 16941 LaMotte Company 56.57 Sulfide Test Kit 16942 League of Co.Cities.Orange County Div. 95.00 Publications 16943 Lessons in Leadership 1.116.00 Seminar Registration 16944 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Publications 16945 Lieberi, Cassidy&Frierson 1,595.00 Membership 16946 Long Beach Line-X 357.38 Truck Supplies 16947 Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership 16948 JLM Gen.Contracting&Environmental 23,868.00 Manhole Repair 16949 Mar Vac Electronics 21.54 Instrument Supplies 16950 Martin McIntosh Land Surveying 10,609.45 Professional Services-Traffic Study 16951 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3,319.01 Valves 16952 Mc Junkin Corp. 209.28 Plumbing Supplies Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116/99 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16953 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 738.86 Toole 16954 Micro Motion, Inc. 1,152.77 Electrical Supplies 16955 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,961.89 Mechanical Repairs 16956 Mission Uniform Service 4,531.53 Uniform Rentals 16957 Moody's Investor's Service 5.000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 16958 Motion Industries 360.12 Pump Supplies 16959 Multiform Systems Corp. 1,875.00 Computer Equip.Services-Fuel Mgml. System 16960 MPS Photographic Services 16.17 Photographic Services 16961 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 16962 National Assoc.of Regional Councils 275.00 Registration 16963 National Microcomp Services 4,090.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 16964 National Technical Information 82.50 Publications 16965 Neal Supply Co. 2,220.46 Plumbing Supplies 16966 Network Solutions Group 980.00 Cable Installation Specification 16967 New Hermes, Inc. 595.31 Tools 16968 Newark Electronics 718.81 Instrument Supplies 16989 Nextel Communications 688.88 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time 16970 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 6,917.03 LubricenVDiesel Fuel 6' 16971 Ninyo 8 Moore 449.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 N 16972 Northwestern Carbon 1,389.55 Filters roi 16973 O01ce Depot Business Services 1,429.59 Office Supplies r+' 16974 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 196.00 Temporary Employment Services 16975 Orange County Sanitation District 19,768.54 Worker's Comp.Relmb. 16976 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 23.77 Plumbing Supplies 16977 Orange County Forum 300.00 Conference Registration 16978 Orange County Sanitation District 416.05 Petty Cash Relmb. 16979 Orange County Wholesale Electric 478.35 Sectdcal Supplies 16980 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 301.53 Fittings 16981 Oxygen Service Company 1,077.03 Specialty Gases 16982 OCB Reprographics 1,123.51 Printing Service-Spec P-173 16983 Pacific Bell 89.64 Telephone Services 16984 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1.151.50 Internet Services 16985 Pacific Mechanical Supply 388.39 Plumbing Supplies 16986 Pacific Publishers 30.78 Publication 16987 Pagenet 1.901.51 Rental Equipment 16988 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 665.59 Tires 16989 Pads Unlimited 741.60 Truck Supplies 16990 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 3,520.75 Filters 16991 Petco Animal Supplies 68.99 Lab Supplies 16992 Pinnacle One 34.32 Consulting Services 5-37-3 Page 5 of 9 e Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1/31199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16993 Power Bros. Machine,Inc. 815.36 Mechanical Maint. 16994 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin. 16995 Public Financial Management,Inc. 7,500.00 Arbitrage Consulting Services 16996 PC Magazine 54.97 Subscription 16997 PCS Express 99.00 Courier Service 16998 PIHRA 90.00 Membership 16999 R. L.Abbott&Associates 2,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 17000 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 414.06 Trash Removal 17001 Randolph Austin Co. 665.00 Lab Supplies 17002 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 17003 Regents of University of Calif. 330.00 Registration 17004 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1.286.41 Electrical Supplies 17005 Remedy 7.191.04 Temporary Employment Services 17006 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 450.00 Video Production Service 17007 RPM Electric Motors 296.31 Electric Motor Repair 17008 Safety-Kleen 840.00 Service Agreement 17009 Sand Dollar Business Forms 310.32 Printing Supplies 17010 SamaFe Industrial Products 466.46 Mechanical Supplies 17011 Sanorius Corporation 195.80 Publications 17012 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment 17013 Scutt Specialty Gases, Inc. 404.06 Specialty Gases m 17014 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 3.748.00 Lab Repairs 17015 Seagate Software 6,916.46 Software Maint.Agreement 17016 Second-Sun 117.37 Light Fixtures 17017 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 707.53 Tools 17018 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,483.13 Tools/Hardware 17019 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 15.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 17020 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 1,286.74 Lab Supplies 17021 Skater, Inc. 271.00 Pump Supplies 17022 Snap-On Incorporated 130.57 Tools 17023 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.814.23 Natural Gas 17024 South Coast Water 10.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 17025 Sparkletts 2.094.02 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 17026 State Board of Equilization 445.16 Underground Storage Tank Fee 17027 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 624.00 Janitorial Supplies 17028 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4,879.01 COP Trustee Services 17029 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 17030 Summit Steel 1,797.58 Metal 17031 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 17032 Sunset Ford 85.60 Truck Supplies Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17033 Sunset Industrial Parts 122.94 Mechanical Supplies 17034 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration 17035 Target Specialty Products 99.00 Registration 17036 Tekmar Company 185.13 Lab Supplies 17037 Tektronix, Inc. 699.87 Instrument Supplies 17038 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 17039 Thermo Quest 2,300.00 Lab Maim.Service 17040 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 563.88 Mechanical Supplies 17041 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 340.70 Truck Supplies 17042 TEKsyslems 7,216.00 Temporary Employment Services 17043 U.S.Filter Corporation 2,525.50 Lab Water Purification System Maim. 17044 Ultra Scientific 84.87 Lab Supplies 17045 Union Dodge 18,075.06 1999 Dodge 1500 Pick-up 17046 University of Nevada, Las Vegas 760.00 Seminar Registration 17047 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,640.60 Plumbing Supplies 17048 Vortex Corp. 516.00 Door Repair 17049 VWR Scientific Products 4.294.67 Lab Supplies 17050 The Wackenhut Corporation 11.795.86 Security Guards 17051 Water Environment Federation 967.84 Publications&Ads rt 17052 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 216.44 Safety Supplies 17053 Western Highway Products,Inc. 305.33 Pavement Marker Supplies 17064 WEF Membership 120.00 Membership 17055 Xerox Corporation 3.611.29 Copier Leases 17056 3 Com Palm Computing,Inc. 118.42 Publications 17057 991&HW-CWEA,Inc. 225.00 Registration 17058 Nicholas J.Arhontes 150.00 Employee Travel Advance 17059 Dell Home Systems,Co.&S. Howard 1,463,15 Employee Computer Loan Program 17080 Michael L. Peterman 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program 17061 Victoria L.Raymond 1,987.01 Employee Computer Loan Program 17062 John D.Stephens 1,463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program 17063 Robert J.Thiede 2,421.90 Employee Computer Loan Program 17064 Edward R. Eisenhauser 1,600.00 Professional Service-Financial 17065 J.D.Edwards Word Solutions Company 500.00 Training Expenses 17066 Aladdin House 74.48 Window Blinds 17067 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 230.87 Mechanical Supplies 17088 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services 17069 Court Order 518.90 Wage Garnishment 17070 BOC Edwards 791.98 Lab Supplies 17071 Calif Centrifugal Pump 674.52 Pump Supplies 17072 Canus Corporation 2,991.72 Fiber Optic Cable Page 7 of 9 , Claims; Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17073 Court Order 681.00 Wage Garnishment 17074 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,123.38 Electrical Supplies 17075 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 17076 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 17077 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads 17078 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 17079 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 17080 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 17081 Geomatrix Consultants 8,336.02 Legal Services 17082 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 44e.95 Truck Supplies 17083 Intergraph Corporation 6,671.88 Annual Software Maint. 17084 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 17085 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction 17086 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 693.11 Safety Supplies 17087 J.Spencer Freebairn 201.12 SA Watershed Brisling 17088 Kelar Corp 15,000.00 Professional Services-Project Mgmt. Fundamentals Guide 17089 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.74 Welding Supplies 17090 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 682.60 Tools 17091 Melvin Schwartz,MD 1,750.00 Legal Services K 17092 Network Construction Services 7,653.61 Construction Services-Wring for J-42 t`o 17093 Neysa M.Call 1.049.77 SA Watershed Briefing m 17094 Office Pavillicn 346.64 Office Furniture 17095 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment 17096 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 17097 Orange County Wholesale Electric 4,535.18 Electrical Supplies 17098 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 445.45 Fittings 17099 OCEA 615.61 Dues Deduction 17100 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 17101 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 17102 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 17103 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 7,960.00 Engineering Services-Tunnels Evaluation 17104 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies 17105 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 166.11 Tools 17106 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,392.04 Tools/Hardware 17107 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 17108 Skater,Inc. 51.52 Pump Supplies 17109 Snap-On Incorporated 70.33 Tools 17110 So. Cal.Gas Company 28.06 Natural Gas 17111 Southern California Edison 20,103.58 Power 17112 Sprint 58.85 Long Distance Telephone Service Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrard No. Vendor Amount Description 17113 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment 17114 Surveyors Service Company 105.57 Tools 17115 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. 9,860.00 Professional Services NO 4-23-97 17116 Thompson Industrial Supply, In 925.08 Mechanical Supplies 17117 Tomell 8 Cotten 538.80 Legal Services 17118 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 21,760.00 Permit Fees 17119 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 17120 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions 17121 VWR Scientific Products 356.80 Lab Supplies 17122 CASA-Biosolids EIR 25,000.00 Statewide Biosolids Land Application EIR Funding 17123 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28,731.11 Medical Insurance Premium 17124 Orange County Sanitation District 472,264.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 17125 Mar Vac Electronics 124.90 Instrument Supplies Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,783,184.34 Payroll Disbursements 12546-12737 Employee Paychecks $ 112,519.88 Leave Accrual,Termination 8 BOP Payoffs 12738-12878 Employee Paychecks 187,702.69 Biweekly Payroll 1/27/99 Cy 12879-12890 Employee Paychecks 1.182.60 Shift Differential Adjustments n 34645-35086 Direct Deposit Statements 644,151.04 Biweekly Payroll 127/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 945,556.11 Wire Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 1116199-1131199 $ 3,728,740.45 Page 9 of 9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeng Date TOBd.or .DU. g3R9�99 AGENDA REPORT tam Number tam pumber Orange County Sanitation District (O FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions regarding Certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System: a. Verbal staff report b. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-01, Making Certain Findings Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System; adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-02, Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System has been completed in compliance with CEQA. SUMMARY This item is the certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)for the Groundwater Replenishment System, certification of the EIR is one of several important steps to be completed before a final decision to build the project can be considered. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8), Page 11, Line Water Management Projects, A ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Page 1 R I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Orange County Water District (OCWD), in cooperation with OCSD, has completed the environmental compliance materials for the Program EIR/EIS on the Groundwater Replenishment System. The Draft Program EIR/EIS was circulated for public comment for 62 days (45 days required by CEQA), and the comment period closed January 6, 1999. Within the public review period, an open house attended by about 20 people was held on December 1, 1998. In addition, a public hearing was conducted by the Joint Cooperative Committee on December 8, 1998, at which 12 people spoke. Twenty-two written comments were received throughout the comment period. Responses to the eleven oral comments received at the December Sin public hearing and the 22 written comments have been prepared and included in the Final EIR. The Final EIR was circulated on February 22, 1999, to all that received the Draft EIR, or had made written and/or oral comments. OCSD Board of Directors received the Final EIR (Attachment "A" to Resolution 99-01) by separate letter in February. CEQA requires a ten-day circulation of the Final EIR. As of this writing, we have not received any comments on the Final EIR; if any comments are received, they will be report at the March 24 meeting. Separately, the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) closed the public comment period on the federal Draft EIS for the project. No one attended the public hearing on January 28, 1999, held at OCWD. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Item "b and c" in the General Manager's Recommendation in this report includes the CEQA Actions for this project. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 99-01 (with Attachment"B") and Resolution No. OCSD 99412. JRH:jp:jak H:Nip.dta%agenda\Board Agenda RepoW1999 Board Agenda Re,,Ws0399\G R EIR Eoc Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-01 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ("THE PROJECT"1; ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ("THE PROJECT"); ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT MARCH 24, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval of a water reclamation project, described as the Groundwater Replenishment System, hereinafter referred to as "GWR System"; and, WHEREAS, District and the Orange County Water District of Orange County (OCWD), California (hereinafter referred to as Water District) are the lead agencies for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the GWR System, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, to assess the GWR System's environmental impacts objectively, Water District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and ,y alternatives associated with the GWR System; and, WHEREAS, Water District has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as required by CEOA; and, WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System, previously formed by the District and the Water District, held a duly-noticed public hearing to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the Draft Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, Water District has objectively evaluated the comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program EIR, either in full or in summary, together with Water District's responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process, have been included in the Final Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR and the Final Program EIR have been presented to the members of the Board of Directors of District for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Groundwater Replenishment System. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: -2- SECTION 1. That the proposed Groundwater Replenishment System has identified a number of significant or potentially significant environmental effects. These impacts are identifed in the Final Program EIR, that is appended to this Resolution as ATTACHMENT "A". SECTION 2. That the Board of Directors do further find that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed Project, which avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects, all identified in the Final Program EIR. SECTION 3. Significant impacts identified in the Final Program EIR that will be mitigated to less-than-significant levels by that District are as follows: A. LAND USE AND PLANNING The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Land Use and Planning are described on pages 3-6 to 3-19 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Project Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. Construction of the new advanced water treatment plant will result in the demolition of some existing facilities within the OCWD/OCSD complex including part of the existing Water Factory 21 which will create construction impacts including the generation of dust, construction traffic, noise and potential conflicts with existing underground utilities. 2. The tall ammonia stripping towers on the western edge of OCWD's property will be removed. 3. New water treatment facilities will be constructed on a portion of the Garfield Recreation Vehicle (RV)/Self Storage Yard which is located on land owned by the OCSD. This will result in the need to impact the operation of this facility and ultimately the permanent removal of RVs and other material stored on this site. 4. Construction of the 78-inch major conveyance pipeline from the new advanced water treatment plant to Kraemer Percolation Basin in Anaheim -3- will temporarily disrupt a variety of land uses between the treatment facilities and the Santa Ana River, depending upon which route is used. The exact route the pipeline will follow will be determined by OCWD and OCSD during final project design. Under Option A, the pipeline would be constructed within the OCWD/OCSD complex and along a portion of Garfield Avenue. Pipeline construction would temporarily impact a portion of the RV/Self Storage yard and the entrance to this facility. Access to the Southern California Edison substation and the Village Nurseries on the south side of Garfield Avenue will also be temporarily impeded. The flow of traffic on the portion of Garfield Avenue impacted by pipeline construction would also be temporarily impeded. Under Option B, the pipeline would be developed within the OCWD/OCSD complex and, from the complex to the Santa Ana River, within exiting road rights-of-way. Construction of the pipeline would temporarily impact commercial and industrial land uses along portions of Mount Langley Street, Spencer Avenue, Mount Baldy Circle and Condor Avenue. Dust and noise impacts would be created on these land uses and some on-street parking would be temporarily removed on some of these streets. The flow of traffic will also be impacted on the streets where the pipeline is constructed. The San Diego Freeway (1-405) will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under the Freeway. Under Option C, the pipeline would be developed within the OCWD/OCSD complex and, from the complex to the Santa Ana River, within existing road rights-of-way, along a portion of a flood control channel and under the San Diego Freeway. Noise and dust from construction of the pipeline would temporarily impact employees working in the administrative offices of the OCWD and the residential, commercial and industrial land uses along portions of Ellis Avenue, Ward Street, Talbert Avenue and Mac Arthur Boulevard. The use of a portion of the East Valley Flood Control Channel would temporarily be restricted during construction of the pipeline within the bottom or sides of this Channel. The City of Fountain Valley Maintenance Yard and Police Training Facility adjacent to the Channel would also be temporarily impacted by noise and dust from construction of the pipeline in the Channel. Some on-street parking would be temporarily removed on Ellis Avenue, Ward Street and Talbert Avenue and the flow of traffic on these streets would be disrupted. The San Diego Freeway will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under the Freeway. -4- 5. For all pipeline options, once the pipeline reaches the Santa Ana River it would be constructed under the Santa Ana River in the cities of Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa and then within or adjacent to the River levy through the cities of Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim and unincorporated County territory. The pipeline would also be developed within the levy of the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel in the City of Anaheim. Construction of the pipeline in these areas will temporarily disrupt the use of portions of the Santa Ana River Trail as it runs through these cities and County territory, temporarily forcing a detour of the River Trail, In Costa Mesa, pipeline construction will temporarily disrupt the existing underground pipelines and other utilities known to exist within the portion of the River levee within the City. Pipeline dust, noise and construction traffic will temporarily impact a number of single-family residences, aboveground high voltage power lines, Moon Park and an industrial park in Costa Mesa. In Santa Ana, pipeline construction will temporarily impact Centennial Regional Park, a number of single and multi-family residences, Spurgeon Park, the sports fields at Spurgeon Intermediate School and the mouth of Santiago Creek. Play on the River View Golf Course in Santa Ana would be temporarily disrupted if the pipeline is routed through the golf course. In Orange, pipeline construction would temporarily impact the overpass of the Union Pacific Railroad as it crosses the Santa Ana River and a number of businesses and industrial land uses next to the River. In Anaheim, pipeline construction will temporarily impact a number of single family, multiple family and industrial land uses. The Kramer Percolation Basin would also be impacted where the pipeline feeds into the Basin. The Santa Ana Freeway (1-5), the Orange Freeway (SR57) and the Riverside Freeway (SR-91) will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under these Freeways. 6. Improvements to and the extension of the Talbert Seawater Intrusion Barrier will result in the need to repair existing water injection wells in Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley and construction of new water supply pipelines carrying treated water to new injection wells to be developed within streets in Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory. The precise location of the new wells will be determined during the final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Construction of new injection wells within public street rights-of-way will result in the temporary disruption of traffic traveling on adjacent streets and temporary dust, noise and construction impacts on the single-family residences, commercial, educational facilities, electric substations and parks that front onto or back up to the affected street rights-of-way. In unincorporated County territory, a new water supply pipeline would be installed under and within levees of the Santa Ana River, temporarily impacting users of the Santa Ana River Trail. -5- B. SOCIOECONOMIC/GROWTH INDUCEMENT ' The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on SocioeconomiclGrowth Inducement are described on pages 3-27 to 3-30 of the Program EIRlfier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts. Impact on Employment 1. An additional 18 employees will be needed to operate Groundwater Replenishment System facilities at full build out. 2. Construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will result in a temporary increase in construction jobs necessary to build system facilities. 3. Some treated water can be made available for use as industrial process water, irrigation water or for other approved uses via connections to the major conveyance pipeline in industrial areas, business parks, golf courses, and parks located adjacent or proximate to the Santa Ana River alignment. This may be perceived as growth inducing by some people. Impact on Population and Housing 1. The Groundwater Replenishment System does not in any way affect the availability or cost of housing in the project area since it does not require removal of any homes, nor does it result in a substantial creation of new jobs which could secondarily affect the population and housing characteristics of the program area or region. Impact on Low to Moderate Income Housing Needs 1. Implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System is not anticipated to affect the cost of housing in the program area, as it does not remove existing housing nor fully meet the water demands for planned growth in the program area or region. C. GEOLOGY The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Geology are described on pages 3-38 to 340 of the Program EIR7Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the implementation of the Proposed Action would result in the following impacts. -6- 1. Pipeline rupture during a seismic event could result in underground and surface spillage of treated water supplies, with the potential for localized flooding, erosion, liquefaction, differential settlement and lateral spreading. 2. The southerly portion of where treatment facilities will be developed and most of the area of the Seawater Intrusion Barrier and injection wells will be located in urbanized areas underlain by prime agricultural soils. Development of the aforementioned facilities will remove these soils from future agricultural use. 3. The OCWD/OCSD complex is located in an area subject to ground shaking during future seismic events and is thus subject to potential liquefaction. New advanced water treatment facilities developed within this complex are subject to damage from liquefaction during future seismic events. 4. Because the OCWD/OCSD complex is subject to ground shaking from future seismic events, differential settlement and lateral spreading are also possible within this complex. 5. The major conveyance pipeline will be subject to groundshaking during future seismic events and thus would be subject to damage from soil liquefaction. 6. Because the major conveyance pipeline is subject to future groundshaking, differential settlement and lateral spreading of the soil may occur, particularly where the pipeline is placed within the levees of the Santa Ana River. Pipe placed within local streets will experience less lateral spreading with increased distance from the Santa Ana River. Pipe placed in the River bottom will not be subject to lateral spreading. 7. Water injection and new treated water pipelines developed as part of the expansion of the seawater intrusion barrier will be subject to future groundshaking during future seismic events and would be subject to potential damage from soil liquefaction. B. Wells and pipelines to be installed as part of the expansion of the seawater intrusion barrier will be subject to future groundshaking and differential settlement and lateral spreading of the soil may occur, particularly where new pipelines are placed within the levees of the Santa Ana River. Pipelines installed within local streets to serve new injection wells will experience less lateral spreading with increased distance from the Santa Ana River. -7- D. WATER RESOURCES The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Water Resources are described on pages 3-463-61 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: Facts on Surface Water/Flooding 1. Implementation of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities have a direct temporary impact on the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel, the Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, numerous flood control channels and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel depending on where the construction of the major conveyance pipeline occurs. 2. Groundwater recharge areas will be affected by the use of Kraemer Retarding Basin for recharge. 3. An emergency outlet valve placed in the major conveyance pipeline at some point along that portion of the pipe which lies south of 17' Street in Santa Ana will discharge treated water into the Santa Ana River in an unusual emergency situation or when there is not residual capacity for recharge of treated water at the Kraemer Basin 4. Conveyance facilities installed within the bottom of the Santa Ana River and across flood control channels would be subject to damage from high River flows should they be constructed during periods of heavy rainfall events or during times when large amounts of water are released from Prado Dam. 5. The construction of the major conveyance pipeline in the Santa Ana River, Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel and Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel would involve excavation and trenching in portions of the channel bottoms and/or sides which would result in temporary siltation of water in the channels and the ocean should heavy rain events occur during construction or, in the case of the Santa Ana River, there is a release of a large amount of water from Prado Dam. 6. Water traversing the area where the conveyance pipeline is being installed could wash away soil during rainstorms if protective measures are not implemented to protect the exposed soil. 7. Development of additional injection wells and pipelines would impact the Santa Ana River and the Greenville Banning Flood Control Channel since -8- a new reclaimed water pipeline would need to be constructed across these facilities. Impacts on Groundwater 8. The Groundwater Replenishment System will affect the Orange County groundwater basin and the use of that basin as a water supply in that up to 120,000 AFY of recycled water will ultimately be introduced into the local groundwater basin. The quality of the recycled water could have a significant impact on the quality of the groundwater. 9. Department of Health Service regulatory provisions could require that some domestic water production wells be removed from service. 10. Recycled water flows spread in the Kraemer Basin would need to meet the objectives for the unconfined portion of the basin, while flows injected along the coast would need to meet the objectives for the confined portion of the basin. 11. Since it appears that no vadose zone exists at Kraemer Basin, the Groundwater Replenishment System must comply with the 2,000 feet distance and 12-month criteria for spreading. Based on preliminary hydrogeologic assessment, it appears that two existing production wells in the Anaheim area would be affected by the project and have to be abandoned. 12. Should modeling and field studies demonstrate that additional production wells are within the minimum distance and travel times criteria, then additional wells will have to be abandoned. 13. If the Talbert Gap Barrier is extended northward to include the Bolsa Gap, some production wells in the Fountain Valley area may fall within the 2,000 foot, 12-month zone of influence and would have to be abandoned. Impacts on Marine Environment 14. Backwash and brines derived from desalination of secondary-treated effluent from the Groundwater Reclamation System would be mixed with the existing wastewater effluent from OCSD's Plant No. 1 for ocean disposal. 15. Using projected brine loads and concentrations, it is estimated that wastewater effluent total dissolved salts (TDS) in brine coming from the OCSD treatment plant would increase 711 to 851 mg/L by the year 2010, with the receiving water TDS being about 35,000 mg/L. -9- E. AIR QUALITY The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System Project on Air Quality are described on pages 3-68 to 3-77 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts: Construction Impacts 1. Temporary air quality impacts will result from the construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. It is estimated that project grading activities, emissions from construction equipment and workers vehicles will generate a 'worse case" total of 122 pounds of Carbon Monoxide, 15 pounds of Reactive Organic Compounds, 125 pounds of Nitrogen Oxides, 79 pounds of particulates (PM10) and 12 pounds of Sulfur Oxides each day. Lono Term Regional Impacts 2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will generate long term regional air quality impacts. The main source of regional emissions will be from the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site. Other emissions will be generated from the combustion of natural gas for space heating and operations staff automobile traffic. At this time, the quantity of emissions from this combustion is indeterminable. Further studies will be necessary to determine the impacts of these emissions. However, for a program of this size, emissions of this sort do not constitute significant emissions. 3. Emissions will result from off-site generation of electricity to power Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. At this time, the design of the Groundwater Replenishment System is not complete. Therefore, the electrical requirements for the program can only be roughly estimated. However, it is not expected that these facilities will draw enough power to constitute a significant adverse air quality impact at the point of generation. Further studies will be necessary to more precisely calculate power generation emissions. Impacts from Cumulative Regional Emissions 4. Taken individually, emissions generated by the various aspects of the Groundwater Replenishment System will probably not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. However, the cumulative increase in the regional emission levels due to the Groundwater Replenishment -10- System may exceed the SCAOMD's thresholds of significance for some or all pollutants. Compliance with Air Quality Planning —Consistency with AQMP 5. The Groundwater Replenishment System is not projected to significantly impact the local air quality, therefore the project is found to be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan's (AQMP) first criterion (Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations). The population forecasts of those to be served by the Groundwater Replenishment System are the same demographics as the AQMD, and therefore the project is consistent with the second criterion of the AQMP (Exceed Assumptions on the AQMP). Thus it was determined that the Groundwater Replenishment System is consistent with the AQMP. F. TRANSPORTATION The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System Project on Transportation are described on pages 3-85 to 3-91 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of Groundwater Replenishment facilities would result in the following impacts: Construction Impacts 1. Construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will result in temporary impacts to public services such as mail delivery, sanitation pick-up, transit operations and emergency services due to project construction vehicles traveling on area roadways. 2. Temporary loss of access to adjacent property and loss of on-street parking would occur with construction of some Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. 3. The construction of the conveyance pipeline trench will require the import of sand and export of spoil material which will temporarily increase the level of truck traffic on streets used as haul routes. 4. Construction of the advanced water treatment plant will not significantly impact area roadways since most project construction will be done outside of roadway rights-of-way and is not expected to generate a significant amount of traffic. 5. Should the major conveyance pipeline be constructed around the River View Golf Course, project construction activities would impact 17" Street, English Road and Alone Street in the City of Santa Ana. Considering the _11- existing street width on English Road and Alone Street, it is likely that these streets, which are fronted by residential land use, may be required to be temporarily closed. Converting these streets to one-way traffic flow may be possible. 6. Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be followed, traffic on Garfield Avenue between Ward Street and the Santa Ana River may temporarily be delayed by project construction vehicles. 7. Should the Option B alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be followed, then on-street parking along portions of Mt. Langley Street, Spencer Avenue, Mt. Baldy street and Condor Avenue would need to be temporarily removed. Driveways to the commercial and industrial businesses along these streets would also be temporarily obstructed, interfering with access to these businesses. 8. Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be followed, then temporary impacts to traffic operation on Ward Street and Talbert Avenue would occur. The traffic volumes on Talbert Avenue would likely result in LOS F conditions during the peak hours if the number of lanes on this street were temporarily reduced from four to two. 9. Construction of the pipeline segments connecting the injection/extraction wells to the treatment plant would result in temporary impacts to traffic operations on Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Bushard Street, Yorktown Avenue, Ward Street, Adams Avenue, East Mesa Verde Avenue and Gisler Avenue, or other routes used for pipeline alignments. Long-Term Operational Impacts 10. Operation of the expanded treatment facility will result in additional employee, delivery and maintenance vehicle traffic traveling to and from the OCWD/OCSD complex which will increase traffic volumes on streets used by these vehicles. 11. The expanded treatment facility will result in the need for additional chemical deliveries to the facility. The increase in chemicals being delivered to this facility will include: • 7.7 truckloads per week of sulfuric acid; 3.6 truckloads per week of threshold inhibitors; • 3.0 truckloads per week of lime; • 41.4 truckloads per week of sodium hypochlorite; • 1 truckload of cleaning chemicals; 1.2 truckloads of sodium hydroxide, and -12- • 1.2 truckloads of citric acid. G. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Biological Resources are described on pages 3-103 to 3-105 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the project and construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts: 1. Construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will temporarily disturb the habitat on and adjacent to the areas where System facilities are constructed. 2. Use of the Kraemer Basin for recycled water recharge will result in the long-term alterations of the Basin due to fluctuations in the water level of the Basin. 3. Birds could potentially be affected by construction and operation of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. 4. It is possible that water supply lines could be routed along the edge of a park or golf course and disturb some ornamental and/or non-native landscaping. H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on Energy and Mineral Resources are described on pages 3-107 to 109 of the Program EIR and Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts: Energy Impacts 1. The Groundwater Replenishment System will require moderate quantities of fossil fuels and electric power for System construction activities. 2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will require substantial amounts of energy in the long-term to operate the pump conveying source water, the various treatment processes and pumps at the advanced water treatment plant, the pumps needed to deliver water to the Kraemer Basin for recharge and to inject water into the Seawater Intrusion Barrier, and for ancillary uses such as lighting, communications, heating and air conditioning. -13- 3. Reverse osmosis (RO) treatment is a particularly energy intensive process, although many advances have been made over the years to reduce the energy requirements for operation of RO units. 4. The Groundwater Replenishment System will have the following estimated total energy demand: Phase 1 88.9 million kilowatt hours a year (kWh/yr) Phase 2 133.2 million kWh/yr Phase 3 177.7 million kWh/yr Mineral Resource Impacts 5. The major conveyance pipeline for the Groundwater Replenishment System will be constructed in areas that are designated as mineral resource zoned for aggregate resources, including sand and gravel resources which are used for area construction purposes. 6. There is an operating sand and gravel mine just north of Lincoln Avenue and east of the Santa Ana River. However, the Groundwater Replenishment System will not adversely affect existing mining activity in this area. I. HAZARDS/RISK OF UPSET The potential significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment Project on Hazards/Risk of Upset are described on pages 3-113 to 121 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts. 1. There may be a perceived concern that the direct injection of reclaimed water into the groundwater table may impact public health. 2. An emergency outlet valve will be incorporated into the major conveyance pipeline south of 17' Street. In an unusual or extreme emergency situation treated product water would be released into the Santa Ana River. 3. Water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to be directly injected into the Talbert Barrier will receive more MF filtration and receive more demineralization with RO than System water sent to the Kraemer Basin for percolation into the groundwater table. A portion of the flow will be treated by granular activated carbon. In addition, a separate UV light disinfection process will be provided to achieve the required 5-109 reduction in virus. Therefore, the advanced treatment process for the -14- Talbert Barrier will be complete treatment with MF followed by partial demineralization with RO. The remaining flow will receive granulated activated carbon treatment for organics removal for the entire flowstream. The RO permeate will be disinfected through contact time n the existing Water Factory-21 chlorinazation chamber with 5.0 mg/L free chlorine residual, while the MF filtrate will be disinfected with two banks of UV lamps providing up to 5-log reduction in any virus in this water. The two streams will be blended together to consume all remaining free chlorine, avoiding the formation of disinfection by-products. 4. The project will use sodium hypochlorite solution as the primary water disinfectant. Up to 32,400 gallons per day will be used in the advanced water treatment system. 5. Other chemicals that would be used as part of the advanced water treatment include up to: • 6,000 gallons per day of sulfuric acid; 7,200 pounds per day of lime; • 2,400 gallons per day of threshold inhibitor and; • Small amounts of cleaning chemicals. • 1.2 truckloads of sodium hydroxide per week. • 1.2 truckloads of citric acid per week. 6. Sodium hypochlorite is a hazardous substance. Potential risks associated with this material are accidental release from leaks, spills, and rupture or traffic accidents. An accidental spill of a substantial quantity of sodium hypochlorite on the treatment plant site could result in direct exposure of site workers and possibly occupants of adjacent properties to vapors, which would most likely result in respiratory irritation, particularly in sensitive individuals. Prolonged contact with this material could result in skin irritation, although non long-term, adverse health effects are known to be associated with exposure. 7. The accidental release of sulfuric acid poses the greatest public health hazard. This material is highly corrosive to all body tissues and direct contact or inhalation of fumes can cause severe bums. Ingestion of sulfuric acid can be fatal. An uncontrolled release of sulfuric acid from storage tanks on the OCWD/OCSD site or as a result of a traffic accident involving truck delivery would likely result in significant adverse effects to occupants of the site and surrounding area. 8. The remaining chemicals use on the site consist of mild acids and dry alkaline compounds which are not anticipated to present a potential public health threat. -15- 9. Subsurface soil and groundwater contamination from hazardous wastes may be encountered during proposed construction activities involving excavation. Hazardous waste contamination can result in potential clean- up liability issues but may also pose a serious human health threat to persons exposed to the contaminants during conveyance pipeline excavation activities. 10. Implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System may result in temporary impacts related to emergency vehicle access. These construction related impacts would occur for approximately one month during the construction period for any location adjacent to the conveyance pipeline. This would be particularly difficult if the conveyance pipeline was placed in the narrow streets adjacent to the River View Golf Course. Preservation of emergency access would be extremely problematic. Should Option B be selected for the installation of the conveyance pipeline between the OCWD/OCSD complex, then emergency access to the commercial and industrial land uses along portions of Mt. Langley Street, Spencer Street Mt. Baldy Street and Condor Avenue may not be maintained throughout construction, and delays in response time may occur. 11. Traffic flow on roadways adjacent to pipeline and injection well construction areas would be slower, although it is not anticipated that this will result in an increase in accidents, particularly serious ones. 12. Children playing in or near construction areas during non-construction hours may be injured. 13. In the unlikely event of pipeline rupture due to a major seismic event or other cause, temporary flooding in areas not specifically designed to convey large amounts of flowing water could cause extensive damage. Such an event could disrupt public services, utilities, use of surface roads and emergency services for an undetermined amount of time. If the conveyance pipeline were to be installed in the streets adjacent to the River View Golf Course, pipeline rupture could result in flooding that may significantly damage the homes which are immediately adjacent to the narrow 36-foot street rights-of-way. Under option A, conveyance pipeline failure outside of the Santa Ana River alignment could possibly result in flooding the Southern California Edison substation and Village Nursery along Garfield Avenue. Substantial flooding could disrupt electrical service in some locations if -16- the substation is adversely affected. Temporary traffic impacts could also occur along portions of Garfield and Ward Street. Under Option B, conveyance pipeline failure could possibly result in flooding within the commercial and industrial uses along Mt. Langely Street, Spencer Street, Mt. Baldy Street and Condor Avenue. Businesses adjacent to the point of rupture may experience property damage and temporary loss of access. Temporary traffic impacts would also occur if flooding occurred along Ellis Avenue and Ward Street. Under Option C conveyance pipeline failure could possibly result in flooding of adjacent residential land uses west of Ward Street and business park uses east of Ward Street. Business park uses south of Talbert Avenue could also be affected. Land uses adjacent to the point of rupture would receive the most substantial property damage. 14. There is the potential that the weedy vegetation within the Santa Ana River where the conveyance pipeline is to be installed could catch on fire during pipeline construction activities. 15. There is the potential for construction equipment and supplies to be stolen during project construction activities. J. NOISE The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Noise are described on pages 3-129 to 3-133 of the Program EIRITier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: Construction Noise Imoacts 1. Rock drills may be required for the construction of some of the System injection wells and jackhammers may be necessary for pipeline construction. This equipment will create temporary construction noise levels from 70 to 105 dBA at a distance of 50 feet from these construction areas. 2. Sites near the treatment plant will experience temporary construction noise levels ranging up to the high BO dBA range. 3. Sites near the major conveyance pipeline and seawater intrusion barrier pipeline routes may experience temporary construction noise levels ranging up to the high 90 dBA range. _17- 4. Should the conveyance pipeline be constructed on streets adjacent to the River View Golf Course then the homes adjacent to these streets will be temporarily subject to high noise levels. & Sites, including residential land uses, near the injection wells could experience temporary construction noise levels in the 100 dBA range. Haul Truck Noise Impacts 6. It will be necessary to use haul trucks in order to construct the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. Temporary haul truck noise on residential streets would constitute a significant noise impact because ambient (background) noise is fairly low. Construction traffic would raise noise levels in residential neighborhoods and constitute a significant impact. 7. Haul route traffic atop the levee along the Santa Ana River would temporarily impact residential neighborhoods along the portion of the River levee where the conveyance pipeline is constructed. 8. Temporary haul route traffic along arterial roadways would most likely not constitute a significant impact because such roadways already carry high traffic volumes to an extent that additional project trucks would not raise noise levels by more than 3 dBA and would not generally be noticeable to motorists and adjacent receptors. Operational Noise Impacts From the Treatment Plant 9. Long-term operational noise will be generated by the System treatment plant, pumps and injection wells. At this time, the design of the treatment plant is only conceptual so the level of noise that would be generated is not known at this time. K. PUBLIC SERVICES The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Public Services are described on pages 3-137 to 3-141 in the Program EIR/fier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. Construction of facilities called for by the Groundwater Replenishment System will result in the creation of open trenches and equipment left unsecured which will result in a temporary increased need for security services in construction areas to prevent potential theft, vandalism or injury to persons who may enter construction sites. This will result in a -18- temporary increase in the need for police, fire protection and emergency services. 2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will not result in any direct impact to any school facilities. However, it may temporarily impact the entrance and exit to a school training facility on Yorktown Avenue in Huntington Beach. 3. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will require temporary lane closures on streets that serve as public bus routes. While existing bus routes will be maintained during construction activities, bus riders may have to walk slightly farther around construction zones to access sidewalks. Bus stops may be temporarily shut down and people routed to the nearest stop, or routes may be moved to the nearest parallel street. 4. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities may temporarily impact paratransil or door-to-door bus service which is used by the elderly and disabled. However, paralransit service will be maintained during construction activities, although those using this service may have to change the location where these vehicles pick them up. 5. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will create additional amounts of construction debris, including spoil material unearthed during excavation of pipeline trenches, that must be disposed of in area landfills. It is estimated that up to two cubic yard of spoil material may be generated per each linear foot of pipeline trench. Should contaminated soils be uncovered during trenching activities then this material would need to be disposed of at a Class I landfill. 6. Refuse collection services pickup points may need to be temporarily relocated due to the construction of pipeline trenches in some street rights-of-way in the project construction area. However, project construction activities will not interfere with pickup of refuse generated by the land uses located adjacent to project construction areas. 7. Should conveyance pipeline Option B be selected, construction of the pipeline on Ellis Avenue and Talbert Avenue would temporarily impact bus routes 37 and 74. 8. Construction of a potential water injection well could indirectly impact the Isojiro Oka School at 9800 Yorktown Avenue which is operated by the Fountain Valley School District. -19- L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Utilities and Service Systems are described on pages 3-147 to 3-151 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. During construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System project, project water pipelines will cross other existing water pipelines. The conveyance pipeline could potentially impact the OCWD force main at Ball Road/Taft Avenue which delivers replenishment water from the Burris Pit Pump Station to the Bond Street recharge basin. This water pipeline will be protected in place. All other water pipelines impacted by project pipeline construction will be protected in place or relocated. 2. Project water pipelines will cross existing natural gas pipelines. Existing gas pipelines will either be protected in place or will be relocated. 3. Project water pipelines will cross existing local electric distribution lines. These electrical lines will either be protected in place or will be relocated. The System conveyance pipeline will be constructed under and/or adjacent to the massive electric transmission line easement located to the east of the Santa Ana River between the San Diego Freeway and Garfield Avenue. 4. Project water pipelines will cross existing sewer lines including the Santa Ana River Interceptor and other OCSD trunk sewer lines. These sewer lines will be protected in place. All other sewer lines will either be protected in place or will be relocated. 5. Project water pipelines will cross existing storm drains. Conveyance pipeline Option C would directly impact a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel Right-of-way between Ward Street and Talbert Avenue. Should this Option be selected then this flood control channel will be trenched and open cut, the conveyance pipeline installed and the flood control channel would be reconstructed above the pipeline. The major conveyance pipeline will be constructed from the Santa Ana River to the Kraemer Basin in the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel. Other flood control channels or storm drains will either be protected in place or will be relocated during dry weather. 6. Project water pipelines will cross existing communication trunk lines. During construction, communication lines will either be protected n place or will be relocated. -20- 7. Project water pipelines will cross cable television lines. During construction, cable television lines will either be protected in place or relocated. 8. The Groundwater Replenishment System will assist the OCSD by using a large supply of secondary treated wastewater. This reduces the amount of wastewater that is discharged to the ocean outfall. This reduction is important during peak storm periods when the capacity of the outfall could be exceeded. 9. The Groundwater Replenishment System will enhance the dependable dry season water supply by using the steadily available supply of treated wastewater from the OCSD Plant. M. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Aesthetics are described on pages 3-3-156 to 3-161 of the Program EIRliier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. Numerous treatment facility components will be constructed on the OCWD/OCSD site. These facilities would modify views from the adjacent streets since the following structures would be developed: • A Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) building which could be up to 30 feet tall; • An UV disinfection building which could be up to 30 feet tall and located near Ellis Avenue; • An MF/UF building which could be up to 30 feet tall; • An RO facility which will not exceed 40 feet in height. • A pump station building approximately 25 feet tall; • A one story maintenance/Storage building approximately 20 feet tall; and • Various small one-story support buildings including a visitors center and a cleaning/chemicals storage building. 2. Construction impacts related to proposed treatment facilities include modification of views from adjacent streets during the day as well as at night if construction scheduling mandates nighttime construction activities. 3. It is possible that some construction could occur during the early evening hours of darkness in winter months, creating light and glare impacts from these activities. -21- 4. Construction-related visual impacts associated with pump stations would include those to views from adjacent and surrounding properties during the day. Additionally, nighttime impacts could occur if construction scheduling mandates evening or nighttime construction activities. 5. Option Alignment A conveyance pipeline construction impacts would include temporary effects on views from within the street right-of-way and adjacent properties both during the day as well as at night if construction related scheduling mandates evening or nighttime construction activities which could generate light/glare onto adjacent property. 6. Option Alignment B conveyance pipeline construction impacts would have the same aesthetic impacts as Option A. However, because a longer route is involved which abuts an array of businesses, construction would likely occur mostly at night. During the daytime, both workers and business patrons would experience temporary visual impacts due to idle construction equipment, pipeline staging areas and excavated material piles. 7. Option Alignment C conveyance pipeline construction would generate temporary construction-related and nighttime impacts similar to those described for Option A. 8. The conveyance pipeline would be constructed within sections of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel. Construction in these areas would temporarily impact views from surrounding properties and freeway crossings as well as to users of the Santa Ana River Trail. Surrounding properties would be impacted during the day and night if construction scheduling mandates activities during hours of darkness. 9. If the conveyance pipeline is developed through the River View Golf Course then vegetation within the golf course will be temporarily removed, creating a visual impact to visitors to the golf course. 10. If the conveyance pipeline is developed on the streets surrounding the River View Golf Course then extensive temporary visual disturbance would occur to the occupants of the single family homes that line the streets where the pipeline would be installed. 11. Construction of addition injection wells and pipelines to supply these wells will result in temporary light/glare impacts onto adjacent properties and temporary visual impacts due to idle construction equipment, pipeline staging areas and excavated material piles. 22 N. CULTURAL RESOURCES The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on Cultural Resources are described on page 3-175 to 3-178. Approval of the Proposed Action and construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: Paleontological Resources Impacts 1. The advanced water treatment plant would be developed within the OCWD/OCSD complex which is of low to no paleontologic sensitivity. 2. The major conveyance pipeline would be constructed in sediments of low to no paleontologic sensitivity. 3. If the Seawater Intrusion Barrier be constructed on the Huntington Beach or Costa Mesa mesas they would be constructed within sediments with a high paleontologic sensitive. Trenching, grading and well drilling have the potential to impact both vertebrate, plant and invertebrate fossil materials in these areas. Archaeological/Historical Resource Impacts 4. Development of the advanced water treatment plant will not result in any impacts on archaeological or historic resources since it is believed that none of these resources exist within the project site. 5. Depending on the alternative selected for the conveyance pipeline and construction methods used for the installation of the pipeline, all or several of the archaeological sites and the Pacific Electric Bridge which crosses the Santa Ana River near 5" Street may be impacted by construction of this pipeline. CA-ORA-517, CA-ORAA28A29, and -130 are between 1,000 and 2,000 feet from the pipeline route. 6. There is the potential for buried historic and archaeological remains to be found during construction of the conveyance pipeline. The extent of this impact will not be known until any of the resources that are found are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register or the National Register of Historic Places. 7. Depending on the location/route selected for new injection wells and pipelines to serve them, all or several of a number of archaeological sites may be impacted by the development of these facilities. The archeological -23- sites are CA-ORA-76, CA-ORA-163, CA-ORA-516, CA-ORA-145, CA-ORA-283, CA-ORA-302 and CA-ORA-356. 0. RECREATION The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Recreation are described on pages 3- 189 to 3-191 of the Program EIRlfier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. The construction of the advanced water treatment will not result in any impacts to existing recreation resources since there are no recreation resources within or adjacent to the treatment plant site. 2. Construction of the major conveyance pipeline would create a direct but temporary disturbance to portions of the River View Golf Course and the Santa Ana River Trail where pipe is being installed. 3. Parks adjacent to the construction area in the Santa Ana River Trail and east levee of the River will not experience direct physical impacts, but park users may be subject to temporary construction noise and potential construction-generated dust. 4. In many of the parks adjacent to the Santa Ana River Trail, patrons will be able to move away from the temporarily noisy area near the construction zone which will be the case in Moon Park in Costa Mesa, Spurgeon Park, Edna Park and Alone Park in Santa Ana and golfers on Willowick Golf Course, also in the City of Santa Ana. 5. Some park patrons using designated facilities near the construction zone will be unable to move further away from the temporary construction noise. This is the case in Centennial Regional Park where an outdoor sports arena used for Soccer and other sports is located adjacent to the construction zone and spectator bleachers are immediately located adjacent to the Santa Ana River Trail. 6. Golfers using the River View Golf Course will be precluded from traversing any part of the course within or adjacent to the conveyance pipeline construction zone. Since construction may occur on the east edge of the course it may be possible that holes on the west edge of the course could be kept in play. Should this occur, golfers may be exposed to minor impacts from temporary construction noise, access impairment and construction-generated dust. Precise impacts will be determined once it has been decided which program option will be followed for the placement of the pipeline through the golf course i.e. in the bottom of the -24- Santa Ana River, along the east levee of the River or on streets adjacent to the golf course. 7. Portions of the Santa Ana River will be temporarily disrupted during pipeline construction. The entire trail between Gisler Avenue in Costa Mesa and 17" Street in Santa Ana will be temporarily disturbed during conveyance pipeline excavation and installation if the pipeline is installed on the east side of the River. A short portion of the trail between Katella Avenue and Taft Avenue in the City of Orange will also be temporarily impacted at the point where the pipeline crosses from the east site to the west side of the River. However, the trail will be kept open during construction by detouring trail traffic around the construction areas. If pipeline Option B were selected for installation of the pipeline one mile less of the Trail would be excavated for pipeline installation. 8. The new injection wells and the water pipelines to supply these wells will be constructed in the road rights-of-way adjacent to the north edge of Lagenbeck Park along Garfield Avenue in Huntington Beach, the south edge of Estancia park in Costa Mesa. The construction would also be within the flood control right-of-way adjacent to the east edge of Alevalos Park in Huntington Beach. These parks will not be physically impacted but park users may be subject to temporary construction noise and potential construction-generated dust. Park patrons will also be able to move away from noisy areas near the injection welllpipeline construction areas. 9. Part of Mesa Verde Golf Course may be directly impacted during the construction period if pipeline or injection wells are installed along the south edge of the course. 10. During refurbishment of existing injection wells along Ellis Avenue, the construction zone will be adjacent to Ellis Park and would result in temporary noise and dust impacts to the edge of this park. P. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Environmental Justice are described on pages 3-194 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts: 1. No housing units or businesses will be displaced by construction of any of the facilities called for by the Groundwater Replenishment System. -25- 2. Residential areas which abut the project construction zones vary from mobile home parks to multi-family, to middle and upper middle income single family homes. All of these residences will be equally impacted by dust, noise traffic and other construction related impact due to the development of System facilities. 3. The benefit of protection from seawater intrusion would be greatest for the groundwater pumps in Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa and Dyer Road well field areas. C. INDIAN TRUST ASSETS The potential significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on Indian Trust Assets are described on pages 3-196 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of Groundwater Replenishment System will not impact Indian Trust Assets since none are known to exist in Orange County or in any of the cities where Groundwater Replenishment System improvements would be located. SECTION 4. For the following significant impacts, either no feasible mitigation measures are available, or the District will implement certain feasible mitigation measures, but residual impacts will still be significant or potentially significant. For these impacts, specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible other mitigation measures or alternatives that may have been identified in the Final Program EIR. Specifically, the proposed Groundwater Replenishment System project will result in the following significant unavoidable adverse impacts. • Some production wells within the vicinity of project could fall within the minimum distance and travel time criteria for reclaimed water recharge or injection and have to be abandoned. • Emissions from construction activities for the Groundwater Replenishment System will exceed the SCAQMD's Threshold of Significance for NOx. -26- • Should the Option B alignment for the major conveyance pipeline from the advanced water treatment plant to the Santa Ana River corridor be chosen, then numerous driveways to commercial and industrial businesses along portions of Mt. Langeley Street, Spencer Avenue, Mt. Baldy; Street and Condor Avenue will be temporarily blocked by construction of this pipeline. It may not be possible to preserve access to all properties all of the time, disrupting access to these businesses. • Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline from the advanced water treatment plant be chosen and the roadway travel lanes on Talbert Avenue be reduced from four to two during pipeline construction activities, then LOS F levels would occur on Talbert Avenue during peak hours where it is impacted by project construction activities. • Should the major conveyance pipeline be routed around the River View Golf Course on portions of English Road and Alona Street in Santa Ana, pipeline construction activities could require complete closure of portions of these narrow streets, or at a minimum, conversion to one way traffic flow. • Should the major conveyance pipeline be constructed on the neighborhood streets adjacent to River View Golf Course or along the Option B pipeline alignment, then emergency access to land uses along the pipeline alignment may be delayed. • Chemical spills at the advanced water treatment plant and localized flooding from ruptured pipelines could occur during a catastrophic seismic events which exceed magnitudes used in the seismic design of project facilities. • Groundwater Replenishment System construction noise levels would likely be noticeable to residential land uses adjacent to the areas where System _27_ facilities are installed even if local noise ordinances are adhered to or limits are placed on the time of day when project construction may occur. SECTION 5. No significant impacts were identified in the Final Program EIR, project changes or alterations, which require mitigation by another public agency, and not the District. SECTION 6. The District will implement the following mitigation measures for impacts identified as less than significant in the Final Program EIR. A. LAND USE AND PLANNING Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Land Use and Planning are: LU-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army /Corps. of Engineers (ACOE) on their plans to install project improvements along and within the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins. LU-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for review and approval before any project construction begins. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the District during the construction of project improvements. LU-3 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with Caltrans District 12 on their plans to install project improvements under the San Diego, Santa Ana, Garden Grove Orange and Riverside Freeways. The OCWD/OCSD will also obtain the necessary Caltrans Encroachment Permit before any project construction begins under any of these freeways. LU-4 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected, the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Fountain Valley on their plans to install project improvements along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for the use of this flood control channel before any project construction begins. -28- LU-5 Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected, then the OCWD/OCSD shall contact Southern California Edison and the owner of the Village Nurseries on their plans to install project improvements along Garfield Avenue. The OCWD/OCSD shall ensure that construction plans provide for parking for and access to the Edison substation and nursery during project construction activities. LU-6 Should the option be selected of construction through River View Golf Course, the OCWD/OCSD will negotiate a construction easement for construction of project improvements prior to the construction of any improvements. Compensation for business loss during project construction activities shall be addressed in this agreement. LU-7 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all local jurisdictions through which the major conveyance pipelines will pass, including the cities of Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange and Anaheim to provide for coordination between these jurisdictions, the OCWD/OCSD and sponsors of future proposed development. LU-8 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the SCRRA that project improvements will be installed under their railroads in the Orange/Anaheim area. Railroad officials will be given a written project construction schedule. LU-9 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents, business and industry owners adjacent to the streets and Santa Ana River levees where project improvements are installed with a notice that project improvements will be made adjacent to their homes, businesses or industries. The project construction contractor will provide access to all residences, businesses and industries impacted by project construction activities. LU-10 The OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate with the cities of Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana Public Works Departments about their plans to construct project improvements within select streets within these cities. They shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits to temporarily relocate on street parking and construct project improvements within city streets before any project construction takes place. LU-11 Should the option be selected to go around the River View Golf Course on streets within the City of Santa Ana, then the OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate construction plans with the City's Public Works Department. They shall also obtain the necessary encroachment permit to temporarily relocate on street parking and construct project improvements within City streets before any project construction takes place. -29- LU-12 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected, the OCWD/OCSD shall notify the City of Fountain Valley that the project will be constructed adjacent to the Citys Maintenance Yard and Police Training Facility, providing the supervisor of this facility with a written project construction schedule. LU-13 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all federal, state, county and city jurisdictions through which the project will pass regarding the selected project alternative, construction plans and schedules. This will also allow for coordination between the local jurisdictions and the OCWD/OCSD regarding traffic detours, public notification and coordination with sponsors of any concurrent development along the project route. The OCWD/OCSD will also work with these effected local jurisdictions and planning agencies to incorporate measures to reduce impacts created by project construction activities. These measures may include land closures, detour signs, flagman and use of dust control measures such as water trucks. LU-14 Final construction documents and a copy of the project plans will be made available by the OCWD/OCSD to interested and impacted federal, state, county and city agencies to ensure compatibility with future land use scenarios. LU-15 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate County and city parks departments where the project will traverse or be directly adjacent to a County or city park. The parks departments shall be provided with a written schedule for completion of project improvements adjacent to the park and the project contractor will provide access to the park during project construction activities. LU-16 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate school districts where the project will potentially impact a school or access to a school. The school district shall be provided with a written schedule for completion of project improvements adjacent to the school and the project contractor will provide access to the school during project construction activities. LU-17 The OCWD/OCSD will negotiate construction easements with any affected property owners. Compensation for relocation or temporary relocation of property owners during project construction activities shall also be addressed in this agreement if necessary. LU-18 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents and business owners adjacent to the streets and Santa Ana River levees where project improvements are installed with a written project construction schedule. The project construction contractor shall provide access to these land uses during project construction activities. -30- B. SOCIOECONOMIC/GROWTH INDUCEMENT The Groundwater Replenishment System does not result in impacts related to population, housing and/or employment that have not been accounted for by SCAG in its regional growth forecasts. Therefore, no mitigation is required. C. GEOLOGY Conditions and other measures applicable to the Proposed Action that would mitigate for impacts to Geology are: G-1 The OCWD/OCSD will ensure that all structures for the Groundwater Replenishment System, including the treatment, conveyance and Water Factory 21/expansion of the Seawater Intrusion Barrier components, are designed and constructed in compliance with current engineering practices, including the Uniform Building Code and all applicable seismic engineering guidelines. D. WATER RESOURCES Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Water Resources are: SURFACE WATER/FLOODING SWA The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) on their plans to install Groundwater Replenishment System improvements along and within the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins. SW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for review and approval before any project construction begins. Work on the agreement shall commence prior to final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the District during the construction of project improvements. SW-3 Should major conveyance pipeline Option C be selected, the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install improvements within or along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with -31- the County for the use of this flood control channel before any project construction begins. SW-4 All Groundwater Replenishment System facilities proposed to be constructed within or adjacent to the Santa Ana River or other flood control channels, or will be construct across a flood control channel, shall be constructed during the dry season (normally April through December). Flood control facilities disturbed by system construction shall be fully restored to their original design condition prior to the onset of the rainy season (October 15) so that the flood control capacity of the affected OCFLD facilities are not comprised. SW-5 Any pipeline constructed in the bottom or levees of flood control facilities shall be designed in a manner which protects them from undermining or scour due to flows in the channel. SW-6 A Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act Permit shall be required for construction of any Groundwater Replenishment System improvements within the Santa Ana River. SW-7 Best Management Practices, including sandbagging, manufactured channels or swales, diversion velocity dissipators, desilling basins, detention/retention ponds shall be used to prevent sedimentation from the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System. SW-8 Release of treated water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to the Santa Ana River shall occur only in event of an extreme emergency. SW-9 The Groundwater Replenishment System shall comply with the requirements of the state non-point NPDES program. GROUNDWATER GW-1 Should modeling and field studies indicate that any production wells are within the minimum distance and travel time criteria for proximity to reclaimed water recharge or injection, these wells shall be abandoned or limited to approved non-potable uses. Wells which are abandoned shall be replaced by new wells constructed outside to the area of influence. GW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install project improvements under the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel and the east and west River levees. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the OCFCD for review and approval before any project construction takes place. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County of Orange -32- for use of the Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel before any project construction begins. MARINE ENVIRONMENT No impacts to the beneficial uses of ocean waters are expected to occur as a result the proposed Groundwater Replenishment System or its alternatives. Therefore, no mitigation is required. The OCSD will continue to implement their existing source control monitoring programs to detect any changes in the influent and effluent quality which could impact regulatory compliance. E. AIR QUALITY Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Air Quality are: AQ-1 Construction Contractors shall use low emission mobile construction equipment to reduce the release of undesirable emissions. Construction equipment shall use low sulfur fuels and shall be maintained in proper tune. Electric power shall be used to the extent feasible. AQ-2 Construction Contractors shall develop a trip reduction plan to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership for construction employees. AQ-3 Construction Contractors shall water active grading sites at least twice a day, and clean appropriate construction equipment in the morning and/or evening to reduce particulate emissions to reduce the release of fugitive dust. AQ-4 Construction Contractors shall, as necessary, wash truck tires leaving the site to reduce the amount of particulate matter transferred to paved streets as required by SCAQMD Rule 403. AQ-5 Construction Contractors shall spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads and parking areas. Ground cover shall be reestablished on construction sites through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be disturbed for two months or more in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust. AQ-6 Construction Contractors shall sweep on and off site streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares, as determined by the City Engineers in the affected jurisdictions to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets. AQ-7 Construction Contractors shall limit traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust. -33- AQ-8 Construction Contractors shall suspend grading operations during first and second stage smog alerts and suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour. AQ-9 Construction contractors shall develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities. AQ-10 During the project facility design stage, improve the thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce the thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. F. TRANSPORTATION Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Transportation are: TR-1 Where construction activities impact public roads, the contractor shall ensure that one clear lane of traffic will be maintained at all times to facilitate public traffic circulation and emergency vehicle access. TR-2 The construction contractor will be responsible for preparing adequate detour and access plans to ensure the safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians during the construction period. These plans must ensure access to private property at all times. TR-3 The construction contractor will be responsible for seeking approval of detour and access plans by the public works department in whose jurisdiction construction work is scheduled. TRA The construction contractor shall ensure that police, fire, transit and other public agencies who may be impacted by roadway detours or street closure, be advised prior to initiating construction activities. TR-5 The construction contractor shall obtain a Public Work Permit from the City of Fountain Valley for the development of any Groundwater Replenishment System facilities in City street rights-of-way. The construction contractor shall comply with all conditions set forth in the permit e.g., hours of operation, lane closures, trench length and pavement replacement etc. G. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES No significant impacts to biological resources will result since construction will occur in areas which are already disturbed by urban development, flood control, groundwater recharge, maintenance or in non native and/or ornamental landscaping conditions. -34- H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for Energy impacts are: EM-1 Project design and construction shall consider energy efficiency as an important factor in the selection of equipment, including treatment processes, lighting, heating and air conditioning equipment. EM-2 Project design shall incorporate the use of variable speed pumps to optimize energy use. There are no significant impacts on mineral resources that require mitigation. I. HAZARDS /RISK OF UPSET Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Hazards and Risks of Upset are: HZ-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall properly site, design, operate and maintain sodium hypochlorite storage tanks so as to minimize the potential for sudden releases in the event of a tank failure caused by seismic events or other reasons in the project area. At a minimum the design of the tanks shall conform to standards and codes of the State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. HZ-2 The OCWD and OCSD shall ensue that the proposed pipeline features, including pumping stations, recharge basins and water treatment facilities shall be designed, constructed, operated and maintained according to the most appropriate seismic standards and guidelines. At a minimum the design of the pipelines shall conform to standards and codes of the State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. HZ-3 An adequate seismic Emergency Response Plan shall be prepared by; the OCWD and OCSD for each feature of the Proposed Project including pipeline segment and injection wells. The plan shall be approved by local agencies prior to operation of each project phase. HZ-1 An adequate Emergency Response Plan shall be developed by; the OCWD and OCSD and approved by appropriate agencies to address disinfectant chemicals and other hazardous materials which will be used, stored and/or transported in association with the construction and operation of the Proposed Project. -35- HZ-5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the OCWD and/or OCSD shall be required to submit tot he Cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa a preliminary environmental site assessment which addresses the potential for site contamination from land uses on and adjacent to the construction areas. If potential contamination issues are identified during the preliminary site assessment, OCWD and/or the OCSD shall be required to conduct additional investigation and remediation as required by the jurisdictional state or local agency. HZ-6 Any use of hazardous materials on the Propose Project site must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal, state and local regulations. HZ-7 The OCWD shall develop an emergency response plan to address major release of chemicals used on the site. The emergency response plan shall be approved by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and Orange County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Units. J. NOISE Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System project that would mitigate for impacts to Noise are: N-1 The Construction Contractor shall be required to adhere to all Noise Ordinance provisions of the cities of Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Huntington Beach and the County of Orange. Additionally, noisy construction within 500 feet of existing homes shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekdays, 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays and not at any time on Sunday or Federal holidays. N-2 Barriers shall be installed around the noise sources or directly between the construction area and the nearest homes to shield these residents from direct noise exposure from the construction activities. The height of the barriers is crucial in terms of effectiveness, the higher the barrier the more the more the noise reduction. Types of shielding include leaded blankets, an acoustic blanket, or several layers of plywood. N-3 Mufflers shall be used on all construction equipment. N-4 Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented where feasible. Loud equipment shall not be separated and not grouped in one location. Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be placed away from sensitive receptors. N-5 A detailed noise control plan shall be required to determine the need for any additional specific noise mitigation measures at the advanced water treatment -36- plant site. The plan shall include post-construction monitoring to determine if the plan's noise goals have been met. N-6 The construction contractor shall coordinate with the Santa Ana Public Works Agency, before any final haul routes and construction study areas for the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities are established. Changes in proposed haul routes and construction study areas shall be made is requested by the Public Works Agency. N-7 'Prior to the commencement of construction and ongoing during construction, property owners/residents/businesses within and adjacent to construction activity shall be notified of the specific construction activity and associated schedule. Additionally, signs shall be posted at strategic locations within the Project area, specifically within the city limits of Anaheim; easily visible at all times during construction. The notifications and signs shall identify the address, "hotline" number, and name of designated person to contact for the purpose of responding to questions or complaints during the construction period. The notifications and signs shall also identify the hours of permissible construction work and estimated duration. N-8 Ongoing during construction, relative to construction activities in the City of Anaheim, construction noise shall be limited to the City of Anaheim's Sound Pressure Levels Ordinance (Chapter 6.7 of The Anaheim, Municipal Code)." K. PUBLIC SERVICES Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Public Services are: PS-1 All school district and private schools affected by construction activities will be noted of construction schedules to lessen potential impacts to instructional and transportation services. Ample time will be provided so affected schools can prepare and plan for possible disruptions caused by project construction. PS-2 Construction contractors shall ensure that adequate barriers will be established to prevent pedestrians from entering open trenches of an active construction area. Warnings shall also be posted sufficient distances from the work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections rather than having to jaywalk. PS-3 At the end of the work day, the construction contractors shall ensure that the work area has been secured to prevent pedestrians from walking into open trenches or other potentially dangerous environments. Measures may include covering the trenches and/or installing temporary fencing and safety lights. -37- PS-4 Construction contractors shall be responsible for providing appropriate security measures, including the provision of security guards, for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for the project. PS-5 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction activities with local public transit providers prior to start of work. PS-6 To reduce the potential of inconveniencing patrons reliant on unscheduled bus or paratransit services, construction contractors shall provide tow week's notice to patrons in construction areas which could be affected by reduced transit accessibility. PS-7 The OCWD and OCSD shall keep all local police and fire jurisdictions abreast of construction schedules. PS-8 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction timing with local refuse companies to ensure timely pickup of business and residential refuse. Coordination shall continue as frequently as necessary to maintain adequate public service. PS-9 Construction contractors shall dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations. L Contractors shall not be permitted to dispose of construction debris in residential or business containers. L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Utilities and Service Systems are: U-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to determine which utility lines and/or facilities will require relocation or abandonment and replacement. This information shall be made available to all applicable construction contractors prior to beginning work on the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. U-2 The construction contractor shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to determine the exact location of all underground utilities prior to doing any work or taking action which could damage such facilities or interfere with their operations. The construction contractor shall protect all existing utility lines and associated substructures from damage unless specifically noted on the plans. U-3 Temporary replacement of utility lines will be constructed by the contractor prior to disturbing existing lines so that disruption is only momentary. This process shall be used during connection and later disconnection of utility lines. -38- U-4 All utilities which cross the pipeline trench will be protected in place, unless otherwise indicated for relocation on the project plans. The contractor will be required to notify the utility owner and Underground Service Alert (DIGAlert) 48 hours in advance of the construction crossing and coordinate the construction schedule with the utility service providers. Where indicated on the plans, the contractor will provide appropriate means to support utilities which lie within excavated areas and which are not self-supporting. U-5 The alignment and profile of the pipeline will be selected by OCWD and OCSD to minimize interference with existing sanitary sewer laterals and collection lines. The construction specifications will require that all utilities including sewer laterals and mains be protected in place during construction and service maintained. Where sewer lines are damaged, specifications will require that they be repaired prior to certification of that contract's completion. Service can be maintained by repairing the damaged sewer immediately and supporting the repaired sewer during construction or by placing a temporary pipe across the excavation and replacing it with permanent sewer pipe at the completion of construction of the conveyance line. Where interference is unavoidable, the sewer lines will be relocated and placed in service before commencing construction of the conveyance line. All new and relocation work shall provide separation of water and sewer lines conforming to State Health Department regulations. U-6 Should water and/or sewer lines need to be relocated within the area, OCWD and OCSD will coordinate all necessary actions with the affected provider in advance of those activities. The law protects existing utilities in place at the time of new construction by requiring the new utility; to pay for; the cost of relocation. U-7 The OCWD and OCSD will coordinate with Southern California Edison and the County of Orange to ensure that electrical power facilities will meet the construction and operation schedule. U-8 The construction contractor will conduct and complete all work on flood control channels during the dry season so that the capacity; of the channels to carry flood water during the wet season is not hindered. U-9 The OCWD and OCSD shall investigate all available alternatives, then select the best method of solids disposal and reduction of solid waste stream as required in the California Integrated Waste Management Act prior to the start of construction. U-10 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with the Orange County Planning & Development Services Department (Orange County Flood Control District) to -39- ensure compatibility; and joint use feasibility with existing and future projects. Plan approval will also be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requisite to County approval. U-11 The OCWD and OCSD shall obtain the appropriate encroachment permit(s) from all affected property owners and responsible agencies. Permits will be obtained from CalTrans, the Orange County Planning & Development Services Department (Orange County Flood Control District), the Army Corps of Engineers, the County of Orange, the cities of Anaheim Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Orange, Southern Pacific Railroad, Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railroad, industrial park (private), River View Golf Course and, if applicable, the Mesa Verde Golf Course prior to start of work upon their land. M. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System project that would mitigate for Aesthetic impacts are: AS-1 Install a minimum 8'-12' wide landscape buffer on the OCWD site along Ward Street and Ellis Avenue. Buffer planting shall include evergreen trees (approximately 15'-20' on center; 15 gallon and 24" box) plus shrubs (minimum double staggered row) to soften views from the streets into the plant site. AS-2 Provide compatible exterior architectural design treatments to pump stations, UV building, GAC, MF and RO facilities and all other storage, office and visitor center structures to be built on the treatment plant site. Designs should blend well with existing office facilities onsite and surrounding uses. AS-3 All onsite security lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential, business uses and away from the Santa Ana River right-of-way. AS-4 Construction contractors shall be required to direct nighttime construction lighting away from residential and institutional uses. AS-5 Construction contractors shall be required to keep construction and staging areas free of trash or other debris and to keep staging areas orderly. AS-6 Contractors constructing the Seawater Intrusion Barrier pipeline shall be required to restore the ground surface to original condition. AS-7 If the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is though the River View Golf Course, affected landscaping shall be restored. If trees with a diameter of more than 6" are removed, they; shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 replacements 40- for every one removed. If smaller trees are removed they shall be replaced at a 1 to 1 ratio. Disturbed greens and rough shall be replanted. AS-8 If the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the adjacent neighborhood, construction contractors shall take extra care to avoid damage to existing street trees. Damaged trees shall be treated to enhance their survival, or replaced with large box specimens if survival cannot be assured. N. CULTURAL RESOURCES Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System project that would mitigate for impacts to Cultural Resources are: Palentological Resources CR-1 An Orange County Certified Paleontologist shall be retained to produce a mitigation plan for the Groundwater Replenishment project. CR-2 The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting to discuss the monitoring, collecting and safety procedures for the project and shall supervise the paleontologic monitoring during earth moving activities, including well boring, in sensitive areas. CR-3 Historic peat bog deposits are not considered paleontologic resources. However, should peat bogs be found during project construction activities, the area should be reviewed by a qualified archaeologist. The areas mapped as Quaternary or Holocene Alluvium shall be monitored or a periodic basis to insure older underlying sediments are not being penetrated. Artificial fill, disturbed soils and rock and slopewash will not require monitoring. CR4 Screening of sediments shall also be conducted under the supervision of the paleontologist during monitoring because many significant vertebrates remains are small. Up to a six thousand pound matrix sample may be processed by any; single locality as recommended in the Guidelines in the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists. CR-5 The paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert or redirect grading to allow time to evaluate any exposed fossil material. CR-6 During monitoring any scientifically significant specimens shall be properly salvaged after evaluation by, and under the supervision of, the paleontologist. During fossil salvage, contextual stratigraphic data shall also be collected. This will include lithologic descriptions, localities plotted on a USGS 7.5' Series topographic quadrangle, photographs and field notes. Specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification, stabilized, identified and curated on a -41- long term loan basis in a suitable repository that has a retrievable storage system, such as the Interpretive Center at Ralph Clark Regional Park, an Orange County facility;, which shall have the first right-of-refusal of the collection, or the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural.History. CR-7 A final report shall be prepared at the end of earth moving activities and shall include an itemized inventory of recovered fossils and appropriate stratigraphic and locality data. This report shall be sent to the Lead Agency, signifying the end of mitigation. Another copy shall accompany any recovered fossils, along with field logs and photographs, to the designated repository. CR-8 Full time monitoring shall be conducted during earth moving activities, including well drilling, in a Pleistocene deposits. Archaeological/Historical Resources CR-9 A focused field survey of archaeological and historic resources shall be conducted before construction of the conveyance pipeline and new injection wells and pipeline to serve the wells as selected by the OCWD for the Groundwater Replenishment System. CR-10 For geotechnical testing along any proposed pipeline route, an Orange County certified archaeologist shall be retained to observe their excavations and to halt work if significant remains are found. Geotechnical testing includes trenches, pot holes and core boring. An archeologist shall be notified at least 24 hours ahead of any geotechnical testing in order to meet the testing schedule. CR-11 An Orange County Certified archaeologist shall be present at the program pre- grading meeting to discuss the monitoring, collecting and safety procedures for the project. At that time, the archaeologist shall review the construction plans and ensure that no construction activity; will affect identified archaeological or historic resources. CR-12 During program grading activities, an Orange County Certified Archaeologist shall be retained to conduct full-time monitoring in archaeologically sensitive areas to observe and retrieve any buried artifacts that may be uncovered. CR-13 If human remains are found during the excavation the steps listed below from the Native American Graves Protection Act guidelines and State law shall be followed: • Halt the work in the immediate area; • Leave the remains in place; -42- • Contact the Orange County Water District, project personnel and the Orange County Comer; • The remains are not to be removed until a representative of the Coroner's office reviews the remains in the field, • If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the most likely descendent from the Native American Community is to be informed; and • The final deposition of remains shall be coordinated by representatives of the property owner and the most likely descendent. CR-14 If prehistoric artifacts or a buried deposit is uncovered, the Orange County certified archaeologist shall temporarily halt construction activities for the immediate area until the archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Implementation of a recovery program would follow, if the remains are determined potentially eligible to the National Register. CR-15 A final monitoring report, including an itemized inventory and pertinent field data, shall be sent to the OCWD/OCSD as well as copies of the report to the Archaeological Information Center at the University of California, Los Angeles, and to the County of Orange Public Facilities & Resources Department- Harbors Beaches & Parks Division. CR-16 Any recovered artifacts shall be properly collected with locations plotted on a USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle, with photographs and field notes of the find. Artifacts will be identified, and artifact catalog prepared, and artifacts stabilized for curation. Any recovered artifacts shall be offered, on a first right- of-refusal basis, to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an educational and research interest in the materials. The Anthropology Museum at California State University, Fullerton would be an appropriate repository to receive any artifacts collected in the study area. O. RECREATION Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System that would mitigate for impacts to Recreation are R-1 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will provide a written construction schedule to all the cities having parks adjacent to the construction zone and to the County of Orange advising when project construction may impact park and recreation facilities within their jurisdictions. 43- The construction schedule will also be provided to the Mesa Verde and River View golf courses. R-2 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will negotiate for construction and access easements and encroachment permits with the operators of the River View Golf Course and if applicable, the Mesa Verde Golf Course, an with entities owning land in the area of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Landowners and responsible agencies include CalTrans, Orange county Flood control District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, County of Orange, the cities of Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach and Orange, Southern Pacific Railroad, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway and a private industrial park. Compensation for business loss shall be addressed in the agreements. R-3 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will prepare will prepare a plan to detour users of the Santa Ana River Bikeway around the construction areas so that the paved trail remains open during construction. The Districts shall work with the County of Orange and local bicycle group on the preparation of a trail detour plan. At a minimum, the following County Departments shall be contacted to help prepare trail detour plan: • Public Facilities and Resources Department, Harbors, Beaches and Parks Department • Planning and Development Services Department. At a minimum, the following local bicycle group shall be contacted. • Orange County Bicycle Coalition, 630 S. Glassel Street, Suite 100, Orange, CA 91666, (714) 288-9130. The final trail detour plan shall be submitted to the above groups for review and comment. R-4 The construction contractor will ensure that adequate barriers are established to prevent recreational facility users from entering the active project construction area. R-5 Following construction, the construction areas in golf courses and the Santa Ana River Trail will be restored to their original condition and re-landscaped as appropriate. -44- P. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE There are no adverse environmental justice impacts that will arise from implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Therefore, no mitigation measures have been proposed for this project. Q. INDIAN TRUST ASSETS No impacts will be created on Indian Trust Assets by construction of facilities proposed as part of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed. SECTION 7. The Districts hereby adopt the following mitigation monitoring and reporting program to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures described in Sections 3, 4, and 6. A. Prior to design and construction, the General Manager of Water District, shall appoint an Environmental Monitor responsible for coordinating mitigation monitoring and reporting activities. B. The Environmental Monitor shall review the design Project and either certify that the facility design complies with EIR mitigation measures, or recommend modifications necessary to achieve such compliance. In addition, prior to obtaining bids for construction of Project, the Environmental Manager shall review the bid documents and certify compliance with applicable mitigation measures. C. The Environmental Monitor shall design a checklist to demonstrate compliance with mitigation measures in the field during construction of Master Plan facilities. The Project manager shall assign staff responsibilities for competing this checklist, and certify compliance with mitigation measures during and after construction of Master Plan projects. -45- D. The Project Manager shall prepare reports to the General Manager on the status of mitigation measure implementation. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan is appended to this Resolution as ATTACHMENT "B". SECTION 6. The Board of Directors of District has balanced the benefits of Project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve Project. The Board of Directors hereby find that the occurrence of the unavoidable significant environmental effects identified in the Final Program EIR and listed in Sections 4 and 5 is acceptable for the following reasons: A. The Project will provide high quality drought-proof water for the existing population and ongoing development approved by local governments after required environmental reviews. The District is a single-purpose agency with the responsibility to collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within the District's service area. B. The Project is necessary to meet the following objectives: to provide an environmentally sound, high quality water supply that reduces the effect of drought on the service area, to comply with all federal and state regulatory standards applicable to the treatment and reuse of wastewater; to encourage wastewater Flow reduction through water conservation and reuse; to reclaim wastewater for beneficial reuse and encourage development of markets for reclaimed wastewater. -46- SECTION 9: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 24, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 47 H:A p. t %dminlBSVie wim %lg koc5DH407.doowi7m 10:06 AM ATTACHMENT "A" Attachment "A" to Resolution 99-01 consists of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report which is in two volumes, the Draft and the Final EIR Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM INTRODUCTION Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt programs to monitor and report on the implementation of mitigation measures that have been adopted to avoid or reduce environmental impacts of projects that agencies have approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Consequently, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been developed for use by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) for the Groundwater Replenishment System. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM The basic elements of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are the mitigation measures identified by each impact category addressed in Section 3.0 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS and the refinements, changes or additions to those measures which resulted from the Response to Comments received on the EIR/EIS. The development of the program was based on the following procedures necessary to initiate and complete the monitoring process. • Identification of the specific mitigation measures proposed for the project from Section 3.0 of the Program EIR and Tier 1 EIS and refinements, changes or additions to those measures in the Response to Comments report/Final EIR/EIS. • Identification of the key periods and events in the project implementation schedule. • Identification of the key personnel and agencies responsible for environmental monitoring. • Monitoring of the implementation of the mitigation measures and documentation that the measures have been properly and thoroughly implemented. • Development of the written document on the implementation of all the mitigation measures, identification of any areas of non-compliance, and proposed activities to bring the project into compliance with the mitigation monitoring program. AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE AND ENFORCE A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM The OCWD and OCSD has the authority to require and enforce the provisions of Califomia Resource Code Section 21081.6. The Groundwater Replenishment System, is a joint project of the OCWD and the OCSD and these Districts will be responsible for approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and for preparing the written report documenting the implementation of System mitigation measures. -1- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B Table 1 summarizes the mitigation measures which have been adopted for the project, specifies the timing for implementation of each measure and identifies the responsible parties for ensuring implementation and the satisfactory completion of each measures. The procedures for implementing the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are: Monitoring Procedures 1. An Environmental Monitor, appointed by OCWD/OCSD, will be responsible for coordinating review of project plans and activities, construction sites and/or operations to ensure that the mitigation measures are properly and thoroughly implemented through the course of the project. 2. Written documentation that each mitigation measure in Table 1 has been implemented will be prepared. This documentation can be on a OCWD/OCSD mitigation monitoring checklist or a similar form that clearly indicates the timing or schedule for implementation, whether the measure has, in fact, been implemented, or in the case of measures that are ongoing, that a process has been developed to ensure continued implementation of the measure. Reporting Procedures 1. The Environmental Monitor appointed by the OCWD/OCSD on this project will be responsible for periodically reviewing the program in Table 1 with the OCWD/OCSD Environmental Compliance Advisor. 2. The Environmental Monitor will prepare a written report for the OCWD/OCSD documenting the completion of the implementation of all the mitigation measures consistent with the schedule and agency approvals indicated in Table 1. For those measures not implemented or that do not fully comply with mitigation measures included in Table 1, an explanation of the areas of noncompliance will be prepared, including a proposal to bring those elements of the project into compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The final report on the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will be kept on file at the following addresses Orange County Water District Orange County Sanitation District 10500 Ellis Avenue 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 -2- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLET GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MMGA71ON MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing Land Use and Planning LU-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S.Army/Corps of Engineers(ACOE)on their plans to install OCWD(OCSD Pre-Construction project improvements along and within the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to ACOE the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins. LU-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construcion project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for OCFCD review and approval before any project construction begins. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the Flood Control District during the construction of project improvements. LU-3 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with CalTrans District 12 on their plans to install project improvements OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction under the San Diego,Santa Ana,Garden Grove Orange and Riverside Freeways. The OCWD/OCSD will also CalTrans District 12 obtain the necessary CalTram Encroachment Permit before any project construction begins under any ofthese freeways. LU4 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate OCDW/OCSD Pre-Construction with the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Fountain Valley on their plans to install project OCFCD improvements along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also City of Fountain Valley enter into an agreement with the County for the use of this flood control channel before any project concoction begins. LU-5 Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,then the OCWD/OCSD shall OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction contact Southern California Edison and the owner of the Village Nurseries on their plans to install project Southern California improvements along Garfield Avenue. The OCWD/OCSD shall ensure that construction plans provide for Edison parking for and access to the Edison substation and nursery during project construction activities. Village Nurseries LU6 Should the option be selected of construction through River View Golf Course,the OCWD/OCSD will negotiate OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction a construction easement for construction of project improvements prior in the construction of airy improvements. River VIeW Golf Compensation for business loss during project construction activities shall be addressed in this agreement LU-7 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all local jurisdictions through which the major OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction conveyance pipelines will pass,including the cities of Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa, Santa Ana,Orange and Cities of Fountain Anaheim to provide for coordination between these jurisdictions,the OCWD/OCSD and sponsors of future Valley, Costa Mesa, proposed development. Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim -3- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing LU-8 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the SCRRA that project improvements OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction will be installed under their railroads in the Orange/Anaheim area. Railroad officials will be given a written UPRR project construction schedule. SCRRA LU-9 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents,business and industry owners adjacent to the streets and Santa Ana OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction River levees where project improvements are installed with a notice that project improvements will be made adjacent to their homes,businesses or industries. The project construction contractor will provide access to all residences,businesses and industries impacted by project construction activities. LU-10 The OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate with the cities of Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa and Santa Ana Public Works OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction Departments about their plans to concoct project improvements within select streets within these cities. They Fountain Valley,Costa shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits to temporarily relocate on street parking and construct project Mesa and Santa Ana improvements within city streets before any project censmnction takes place. Public Works Department LU-11 Should the option be selected to go around the River View Golf Course on streets within the City of Santa Ana, OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction then the OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate construction plans with the City's Public Works Department. They City of Santa Ana shall also obtain the necessary encroachment permit to temporarily relocate on great parking and concoct project improvements within City streets before any project construction takes place. LU-12 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,the OCWD/OCSD shall notify the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction City of Fountain Valley that the project will be constructed adjacent to the City's Maintenance Yard and Police City of Fountain Valley Training Facility,providing the supervisor of this facility with a written project construction schedule. LU-13 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all federal,stale,county and cityjurisdictions through OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction which the project will pass regarding the selected project alternative,construction plans and schedules. This Federal. State, County will also allow for coordination between the local jurisdictions and the OCWD/OCSD regarding traffic detours, City Planning Agencies public notification and coordination with sponsors of any concunent development along the project route. The OC WD/OCSD will also work with these effected local jurisdictions and planning agencies to incorporate measures to reduce impacts created by project concoction activities. These measures may include land closures,detour signs,flagman and use of dust control measures such as water trucks. LU-14 Final construction documents and a copy of the project plans will be made available by the OCWD/OCSD to OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction interested and impacted federal,state,county and city agencies to ensure compatibility with future land use Federal, State, County, During scenarios. City Agencies Construction -4- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment 8 TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing LU-15 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate County and city parks departments where the project will traverse or OCWD/OCSD PIConstmction be directly adjacent to a County or city park. The parks departments shall be provided with a written schedule County and City Parks During project for completion of project improvements adjacent to the park and the project contractor will provide access to the Departments Construction park during project construction activities. LU-16 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate school districts where the project will potentially impact a school or OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction access to a school. The school district shall be provided with a written schedule for completion of project School Districts improvement adjacent to the school and the project contractor will provide access to the school during project construction activities. LU-17 The OC WD/OCSD will negotiate construction easement with any affected property owners. Compensation for OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction relocation or temporary relocation of property owners during project construction activities shall also be Affected Property/ During addressed in this agreement if necessary. Owners Construction LU-18 The OCWD/OCSD will provide resident and business owners adjacent to the street and Santa Ana River OCWD/OCSD levees where project improvements are installed with a written project construction schedule. The project Affected Residents/ construction contractor shall provide access to these land uses during project construction activities. Businesses Owners SocioeconomidCrowth Inducement • None. Geology G-1 The OCWD/OCSD will ensure that all structures for the Groundwater Replenishment System including the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction treatment,conveyance and Water Factory 2I/expansion of the Seawater Intrusion Barter component,are designed and constructed in compliance with current engineering practices,including the Uniform Building Code and all applicable seismic engineering guidelines. Water Resources SW-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE)on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction Groundwater Replenishment System improvement along and within the Seam Ana River. A ropy of all project ACOE plans shall be submitted to the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins. •5- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Palty(s) Timing SW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for OCFCD review and approval before any project construction begins. Work on the agreement shall commence prior to County of Orange final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The OCWD/OCSD shag also enter into an agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the Flood Control District during the construction of project improvements. SW-3 Should major conveyance pipeline Option C be selected,the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange OCWD/OCSD Pre-Constntclion County Flood Control District on their plans to install improvements within or along a portion of the Fountain OCFCD Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for the Orange County ma of this flood control channel before any project construction begins. SW4 All Groundwater Replenishment System facilities proposed to be constructed within or adjacent to the Santa Ana OCWD/OCSD During River or other flood control channels,or will be constructed across a flood control channel,shall be constructed Construction Contractor Construction during the dry season(normally April through December).Flood control facilities disturbed by system construction shall be fully restored to their original design condition prior to the onset of the rainy season (October 15)an that the flood control capacity of the affected OCFCD facilities are not compromised. SW-5 Any pipeline constructed in the bottom or levees of flood control facilities shall be designed in a manner which OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction protects them from undermining or scour due to flows in like channel. SW-6 A Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act Permit shall be required for constuction of any Groundwater OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction Replenishment System improvements within the Santa Ana River. ACOE SW-7 Bert Management Practices,including sandbagging,manufactured channels or swales,diversion velocity OCWD/OCSD During dissipmors,desilting basins,detentiontretention ponds shall be used to prevent sedimentation from the Construction Contractor Construction construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System. SW-8 Release of treated water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to the Santa Ana liver shall occur only in OCWD/OCSD Post-Construction event of an extreme emergency. SW-9 The Groundwater Replenishment System shall comply with the requirements of the state non-point source OCWD/0C5D Post-Conshuctpon NPDES program. Groundwater GW-I Should modeling and field studies indicate that any production wells are within the minimum distance and OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction travel time criteria for proximity to reclaimed water recharge or injection,these wells shall be abandoned or During limited to approved non-potable uses. Wells which are abandoned shall be replaced by new wells constructed Construction outside to the area of influence. -6- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing GW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction project improvements under the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel and the OCFCD east and west River levees. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the OCFCD for review and approval County of Orange before any project construction takes place. The OC WD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County of Orange for use of the Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel before any project construction begins. Air Quality AQ-1 Construction Contractors shall use low emission mobile construction equipment to reduce the release of Construction Contractor During undesirable emissions. Construction equipment shall use low sulfur fuels and shall be maintained in proper Construction tune. Electric power shall be used to the extent feasible. AQ-2 Construction Contractors shall develop a trip reduction plan to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership for Construction Contractor Pre-Construction construction employees. AQ-3 Construction Contractors shall water active grading sites at least twice a day,and clean appropriate construction Construction Contractor During Construction equipment in the morning and/or evening to reduce pardculaic emissions to reduce the release of fugitive dust. AQ4 Construction Contractors shall,as necessary,wash truck tires leaving the site to reduce the amount of particulate Construction Contractor During Construction matter transferred to paved streets as required by SCAQMD Rule 403. AQ-5 Construction Contractors shall spread soil binders on site,unpaved roads and parking areas. Ground cover shall Construction Contractor During Construction be reestablished on construction sites through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be disturbed for two months or more in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust AQ6 Construction Contractors shall sweep on and off site streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction Contractor During Construction thoroughfares,as determined by the City Engineers in the affected jurisdictions to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets. AQ-7 Construction Contractors shall limit traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less in Construction Contractor During Construction order to reduce the release of fugitive dust AQ-S Construction Contractors shall suspend grading operations during first and second stage smog alerts and Construction Contractor During Construction suspend all grading operations when wind speeds(as instantaneous gusts)exceed 25 miles per hour. AQ-9 Construction contractors shall develop a traffic plan to minimise traffic Bow interference from construction Construction Contractor Pre-Construction activities. AQ-10 During the project facility design stage,improve the thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce the thermal OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. -7- Mitigation Manitonng Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Atlaehmenl8 TABLE I GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing Transportation TR-I Where construction activities impact public roads,the contractor shall ensure that one clear lane of traffic will Construction Contractor During ConsWetion be maintained at all times to facilitate public traffic circulation and emergency vehicle access. TR-2 The construction contractor will be responsible for preparing adequate detour and access plans to ensure the safe Construction Contractor Pre-Construction movement of vehicles and pedestrians during the construction period. These plans must ensure access to private During Construction property at all tima. TR-3 The construction contractor will be responsible for caking approval of detour and access plans by the public Construction Contractor Pre-Construction works department in whose jurisdiction construction work is scheduled. City Public Works Departments TR4 The construction contractor shall ensure that police,fire,transit and other public agencies who may be impacted Construction Contractor Pre-Construction by roadway detours or street closure,be advised prior to initiating construction activities. Local Police, Fire, Transit, other Public Agencies TR-S The construction contractor shall obtain a Public Work Permit from the City of Fountain Valley for the Construction Contractor Pre-Construction development of any Groundwater Replenishment System facilities in City street rights-of-way. The construction City of Fountain Valley contractor shall comply with all conditions set forth in the permit e.g.,hours of operation,lane closures,trench length and pavement replacement etc. TRfi Prior to commencing construction,the construction contractor shall submit a construction traffic plan for review Construction Contractor Pre-Construction and approval by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. The traffic plan shall include a truck-haul City of Anaheim Public route identifying the route that all construction and delivery trucks shall follow when delivering or hauling Works Departments materials to the site;location and number of flagmen that will be on-site to safely direct public traffic around construction traffic;and, measures that will be incorporated into the project to protect pedestrians during the project construction. The track plan shall also include measures to prevent conflicts with events at the Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim and the Edison International Field of Anaheim. TR-7 Prior to commencement of construction activities,any street or lane closure should be in accordance with State Construction Contractor Pre-Construction of California Manual of Traffic Controls standards. Detailed detour plans mun be submitted to the City of Anaheim Traffic and Anaheim's Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval." Transportation Manager Biological Resources None necessary. -8- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLET GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing Energy and Mineral Resources EM-1 Project design and construction shall consider energy efficiency as an important factor in the selection of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction equipment,including treatment processes, lighting, heating and air conditioning equipment. EM-2 Project design shall incorporate the use of variable speed pumps to optimize energy use. OCWD/OCSD Pre-Conslruction Haxards/Risk of Upset HZ-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall properly site,design,operate and maintain sodium hypochlorite storage tanks so as OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction to minimize the potential for sudden releases in the event of a tank failure caused by seismic events or other During reasons in the project area. At a minimum the design of the tanks shall conform to standards and erodes of the Construction State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. Post-Construction HZ-2 The OCWD and OCSD shall ensue that the proposed pipeline features, including pumping stations,recharge OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction basins and water treatinent facilities shall be designed,censtructed,operated and maintained according to the During most appropriate seismic standards and guidelines. At a minimum the design of the pipelines shall conform to Construction standards and codes of the State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. Post-Construction HZ-3 An adequate Seismic Emergency Response Plan shall be prepared by the OCWD and OCSD for each feature of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction the Proposed Project including pipeline segment and injection wells. The plan shall be approved by local Local Public Works/ agencies prior to operation of each project phase. Poliee/Fire Departments HZ4 An adequate Emergency Response Plan shall be developed by the OCWD and OCSD and approved by OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction appropriate agencies to address disinfectant chemicals and other hazardous materials which will be used,stored Local FirdPolice and/or transported in association with the caastluction and operation of the Proposed Project. Departments HZ-S Prior to the issuance of grueling permiu,the OCWD and/or OCSD shall be required to submit to the Cities of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction Fountain Valley,Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa a preliminary environmental site assessment which Cities of Fountain Valley, addresses the potential for site contamination from land uses on and adjacent to the construction areas. If Huntington Bach, potential centamination issues are identified during the preliminary site assessment,OCWD/OCSD shall be Costa Mesa required to conduct additional investigation and remediation as required by thejurisdtetional state or local agency. HZ6 Any use of hazardous materials on the project site must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal,state OCWD/OCSD During Construction and local regulations. Construction Contractor Post-Construction -9- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing HZ-7 The OCWD shall develop an emergency response plan to address major release of chemicals used on the site. OCWD Pre-Construction The emergency response plan shall be approved by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and Orange City of Fountain Valley County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Units. Fire Department Orange County Fire Department Noise N-1 The Construction Contractor shall be required to adhere to all Noise Ordinance provisions of the cities of Construction Contractor During Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa,Santa Ana,Orange,Anaheim,Huntington Beach and the County of Orange. Construction Additionally, noisy construction within 500 feet of existing homes shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m.and 7 p.m.on weekdays,7 a.m. to 6 p.m.on Saturdays and not at any time on Sunday or Federal holidays. N-2 Barriers shall be installed around the noise sources or directly between the consWction area and the nearest Construction Contractor During Construction homes to shield these residents from direct noise exposure from the construction activities. The height of the barriers is crucial in terms of effectiveness,the higher the barrier the mom the noise reduction. Types of shielding include leaded blankets,an acoustic blanket or several layers of plywood. N-3 Mufflers shall be used on all construction equipment Construction Contractor During Construction N4 Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented when feasible. Loud equipment shall Construction Contractor During Construction not be separated and not grouped in one location. Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be placed away from sensitive receptors N-5 A detailed noise control plan shall be required to determine the need for any additional specific noise mitigation OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction measures at the advanced water treatment plant site. The plan shall include post-construction monitoring to Construction Contractor Post-Construction delemtine if the plan's noise goals have been met. N-6 The construction contractor shall coordinate with the Santa Ana Public Works Agency,before any final haul Construction Contractor Pre-Construction routes and construction study areas for the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities are established. Santa Ana Public Works Changes in proposed haul routes and construction study areas shall be made is requested by the Public Works Agency Agency. -10- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing N-7 Prior to the commencement of construction and ongoing during construction,property owners/residentst OCWD/OCSD Pre-Constructlon businesses within and adjacent to construction activity shall be notified of the specific construction activity and Construction Contractor associated schedule. Additionally,signs shall be posted at strategic locations within the Project area,specifically within the City limits of Anaheim;easily visible at all times during construction. The notifications and signs shall identify the address,"hotline"number,and name of designated person to contact for the purpose of responding to questions or complaints during the construction period. The notifications and signs shall also identify the hours of permissible construction work and estimated duration. N-s Ongoing during construction,relative to concoction activities in the City of Anaheim,construction noise shall Construction Contractor During be limited to the City of Anaheim's Sound Pressure Levels Ordinance(Chapter 6.7 of The Anaheim, Municipal Construction Code). Public Services PS-1 All school district and private schools affected by construction activities will be notified of concoction OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction schedules to lessen potential impacts to instructional and transportation services. Ample time will be provided Local School Districts/ so affected schools can prepare and plan for possible disruptions caused by project construction. Private Schools PS-2 Construction contractors shall ensure that adequate barriers will be established to prevent pedestrians from Construction Contractor During Concoction entering open trenches of an active construction area. Warnings shall also be posted sufficient distances from the work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections rather than having to jaywalk. PS-3 At the end of the work day,the construction contractors shall ensure that the work area has been secured to Construction Contractor During Construction prevent pedestrians from walking into open trenches or other potentially dangerous environments. Measures may include covering the trenches and/or installing temporary fencing and safety lights. PS4 Construction contractors shall be responsible for providing appropriate security measures,including the Construction Contractor During Construction provision of security guards,for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for the project. PS-3 Pipeline consmiction contractors shall coordinate construction activities with local public transit providers prior Construction Contactor Pre-Construction to start of work. Local Public Transit Providers PS-6 To reduce the potential of inconveniencing patrons reliant on unscheduled bus or paalransit services, Concoction Contactor Pre-Construction construction contractors shall provide two week's notice to patrons in construction areas which could be affected by reduced transit accessibility. PS-7 The OCWD and OCSD shall keep all local police and fire jurisdictions abreast of construction schedules. OCWD/OCSD Prc-Concoction Local Police/Pire During Construction Departments -11- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing PS-9 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction timing with local refuse companies to ensure Construction Contractor Pre-Construction timely pickup of business and residential refuse. Coordination shall continue as frequently as necessary to Local Refuse Companies During Construction maintain adequate public service. PS-9 Construction contractors shall dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations. Contractors shall Construction Contractor During Construction not be permitted to dispose of consWction debris in residential or business containers. Utilities and Service Systems U-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinsle with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction determine which utility lines and/or facilities will require relocation or abandonment and replacement. This Local/Clty Utility information shall be made available to all applicable construction contractors prior to beginning work on the Companies Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. U-2 The construction contractor shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to Construction Contractor Pre-Construction determine the met location of all underground utilities prior to doing any work or taking action which could Local/City Utility damage such facilities or interfere with their operations. The construction contractor shall protect all existing Companies utility lines and associated substructures from damage unless specifically noted on the plans. U-3 Temporary replacement of utility lines will be constructed by the contractor prior to disturbing existing lines so Construction Contractor During Construction that disruption is only momentary. This process shall be used during connection and later disconnection of utility lines. U-4 All utilities which cross the pipeline trench will be protected in place,unless otherwise indicated for relocation Construction Contractor During Consraclon on the project plans. The contractor will be required to notify the utility owner and Underground Service Alert DigAlert (DigAlert)48 hours in advance of the construction crossing and coordinate the construction schedule with the utility service providers. Where indicated on the plans,the contractor will provide appropriate means to support utilities which lie within excavated areas and which are not self supporting. U-S The alignment and profile of the pipeline will be selected by OCWD and OCSD to minimize interference with OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction existing sanitary sewer laterals and collection lines. The construction specifications;will require that all utilities Construction Contractor During Construction including sewer laterals and mains be protected in place during construction and service maintained. Where sewer lines are damaged,specifications will require that they be repaired prior to certification of that contract's completion. Service can be maintained by repairing the damaged sewer immediately and supporting the repaired sewer during construction or by placing a temporary pipe across the excavation and replacing it with permanent sewer pipe at the completion of construction of the conveyance line. Where interference is unavoidable,the sewer lines will be relocated and placed in service before commencing construction of the conveyance line. All new and relocation work shall provide separation of water and sewer lines conforming to State Health Department regulations. -12- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing U-6 Should water and/or sewer lines need to be relocated within the area,OCWD and OCSD will coordinate all OCWD/OCSD Pre-Consuuction necessary actions with the affected provider in advance of those activities. The law protects existing utilities in Local Utility Providers During Construction place at the time of new construction by requiring the new utility to pay for the cost of relocation. Construction Contractor U-7 The OCWD and OCSD will coordinate with Souther California Edison and the County of Orange to ensure OCWD/OCSD Pre-Conslmgion that electrical power facilities will meet the construction and operation schedule. Edison County of Orange U-8 The construction contractor will conduct and complete all work on flood control channels during the dry season Construction Contractor During Construction so that the capacity;of the channels to carry flood water during the wet season is not hindered. U-9 The OCWD and OCSD shall investigate all available alternatives,then select the best method of solids disposal OCWD/OCSD Pre-Consuuction and reduction of solid waste stream as required in the California Integrated Waste Management Act prior to the start of construction. U-10 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with the Orange County Planning&Development Services Department OCWD/OCSD Pre-ConsWction (Orange County Flood Control District)to ensure compatibility;andjoint use feasibility with existing and form Orange County and projects. Plan approval will also be required by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers requisite to County approval. Development Services Department,ACOE U-1I The OCWD and OCSD shall obtain the appropriate encroachment permit(s)from all affected property owners OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction and responsible agencies. Pemdts will be obtained from CalTrans,the Orange County Planning&Development CalTmns,ACOE Services Department(Orange County Flood Control District),the Army Corps of Engineers,the County of Court of e Orange,the cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa,Fountain Valley,Garden Grove,Huntington Beach,Orange, County Orange Local City Souther Pacific Railroad, Atchison,Topeka,&Santa Fe Railroad,industrial park(private),River View Golf Course and,if applicable,the Mesa Verde Golf Course prior to start of work upon their land. UPRR/ATSFRR River View Golf Aesthetics/Lights end Glare ASA Install a minimum 8'42'wide landscape buffer on the OCWD site along Ward Street and Ellis Avenue. Buffer OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction planting shall include evergn m ueee(approximately 15'-20'on center, 15 gallon and 24"box)plus shrubs During (minimum double staggered row)to soften views from the streets into the plant site. Construction AS-2 Provide compatible exterior architectural design treatments to pump stations,l3V building,MF and RO facilities OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction and all other storage,office and visitor center structures to be built on the treatment plant site. Designs should blend well with existing office facilities onsite and surrounding uses. AS-3 All onsite security lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential,business uses and away from the OCWD/OCSD Post-ConsWcllon Santa Ana River right-of-way. -13- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing AS-4 Construction contractors shall be required to direct nighttime construction lighting away from residential and Construction Contractor During Construction institutional uses. AS-5 Construction contractors shall be required to keep construction and staging areas free of trash or other debris Construction Contractor During Construction and to keep staging areas orderly. AS-6 Contractors constructing the Seawater Intrusion Barrier pipeline shall be required to reslore the ground surface Construction Contractor During Construction to original condition. AS-7 H the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the River View Golf Course,affected landscaping OCWD/OCSD Post-Construction shall be restored. Iftrees with a diameter of more than 6"are removed,they shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 Construction Contractor replacements for every one removed. If smaller trees are removed they shall be replaced at a 1 to 1 ratio. Disturbed greens and rough shall be replanted. AS-8 Ifthe final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the adjacent neighborhood,construction Construction Contractor During Construction contractors shall take extra can:to avoid damage to existing street trees. Damaged trees shall be treated to Post-Construction enhance their survival,or replaced with large box specimens if survival cannot be assured. Cultural Resources CR-1 An Orange County Cenified Paleontologist shall be retained to produce a mitigation plan for the Groundwater OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction Replenishment System. CR-2 The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting to discuss the monitoring,collecting and safety OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction procedures for the project and shall supervise the paleontologic monitoring during earth moving activities, project Paleontologist including well boring,in sensitive areas. CR-3 Historic peat bog deposits are not considered paleontologic resources. However, should peat bogs be found OC WD/OCSD During Construction during project construction activities,the area should be reviewed by a qualified archaeologist. The areas Project Archeologist mapped as Quaternary or Holocene Alluvium shall be monitored or a periodic basis to insure older underlying sediments are not being penetrated. Artificial fill,disturbed soils and rock and slopewash will not require monitoring. CR-4 Screening of sediments shall also be conducted under the supervision of the paleontologist during monitoring Project Paleontologist During Construction because many significant vertebrates remains are small. Up to a six thousand pound matrix sample may be processed by any;single locality as recommended in the Guidelines in the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists. CR-5 The paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert or redirect grading to allow time to Project Paleontologist During Constructum evaluate my exposed fossil material. -14- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLET GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing CRfi During monitoring,any scientifically significant specimens shall be properly salvaged after evaluation by,and Project Paleontologist During Construction under the supervision of the paleontologist. During fossil salvage,contextual strxtigraphic data shall also be Post-Construction collected. This will include lithologic descriptions,localities plotted on a USGS 7.5' Series topographic quadrangle,photographs and field notes. Specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification,stabilized, identified and curated on a long tern loan basis in a suitable repository that has a retrievable storage system, such as the Interpretive Center at Ralph Clark Regional Park,an Orange County facility;,which shall have the first right-of-refusal of the collection,or the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History CR-7 A final report shall be prepared at the end of earth moving activities and shall include an itemized inventory of project Paleontologist Post-Constrction recovered fossils and appropriate suatigraphic and locality data. Tbis report shall be sent to the Lead Agency, OCWD/OCSD signifying the end of mitigation. Another copy shall accompany any recovered fossils,along with field logs and photographs,to the designated repository. CR-8 Full time monitoring shall be conducted during earth moving activities,including wall drilling,in any OCWD/OCSD During Construction Pleistocene deposits. ArchaeoloeiraY istoncal Resources CR-9 A focused field survey of archaeological and historic resources shall be conducted before construction of the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction conveyance pipeline and new injection wells and pipeline to serve the wells as selected by the OCWD for the Groundwater Replenishment System CR-10 For geotechnical testing along any proposed pipeline route,an Orange County certified archaeologist shall be OCWD/0CSD Pre-Coruwction retained to observe their excavations and to halt work if significant remains are found. Geotechnicat testing includes trenches,pot holes and core boring. An archeologist shall be notified at least 24 hours ahead of any geotechnical testing in order to meet the testing schedule. CR-11 An Orange County Certified archaeologist shall be present at the program Pre-grading meeting to discuss the Project Archaeologist Pre-Construction monitoring,collecting and safety procedures for the project At that time,the archaeologist shall review the construction plans and ensure that no conslmcdon activity;will affect identified archaeological or historic resources. CR-12 During program grading activities,an Orange County Certified Archaeologist shall be retained to conduct full- Project Archaeologist Pre-Construction time monitoring in archaeologically sensitive areas to observe and retrieve any buried artifacts that may be uncovered. -15- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing CR-13 If human remains am found during the excavation the steps listed below from the Native American Graves OCWD/OCSD Protection Act guidelines and State law shall be followed: Construction Contractor County Coroner • Halt the work in the immediate area; • Leave the remains in place; • Contact the OCWD/OCSD,project personnel and the Orange County Coroner, • The remains am not to be removed until a representative of the Coroner's office reviews the remains in the field; • If the Coroner determines that the remains arc prehistoric,the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the most likely descendent from the Native American Community is to be informed;and • The final deposition of remains shall be coordinated by representatives of the properly owner and the most likely descendent. CR-14 If prehistoric artifacts or a buried deposit is uncovered,the Orange County certified archaeologist shall Project Archaeologist During Construction temporarily hall construction activities for the immediate aura until the archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Implementation of a recovery program would follow,if the remains are determined potentially eligible to the National Register. CR-15 A final monitoring report, including an itemized inventory and pertinent field data,shall be sent to the Project Archaeologist Post-Construction OCWD/OCSD as well as copies of the report to the Archaeological Inf nestion Center at the University;of OCWD/OCSD California,Los Angeles,and to the County of Orange Public Facilities&Resoumes Department-Harbors Beaches&Parks Division. CR-I6 Any recovered artifacts shall be properly collected with locations plotted on a USGS 7.5'topographic Project Archaeologist During Construction quadrangle,with photographs end field notes of the find. Artifacts will be identified,and artifact catalog Post-Construction prepared, and artifacts stabilized for cmaition. Any recovered artifacts shall be offered,on a first right-of-refusal basis,to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an educational and research interest in the materials. The Anthropology Museum at California State University,Fullerton would be an appropriate repository to receive any artifacts collected in the study area. -16- Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM Responsible Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing Recreation R-1 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will provide a written construction OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction schedule to all the cities having parks adjacent to the censbuction zone and to the County of Orange advising Local City/County Parks when project construction may impact park and recreation facilities within theirjunsdictions. The construction Departments schedule will also be provided to the Mesa Verde and River View Golf courses. R-2 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will negotiate for construction and OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction access easements and encroachment permits with the operators of the River View Golf Course and if applicable, River Vim Golf the Mesa Verde Golf Course,an with entities owning land in the area of the Groundwater Replenishment OCFCD,ACOE System, landowners and responsible agencies include CalTrans,Orange County Flood control District,U.S. County of Orange Army Corps of Engineers,County of Orange,the cities of Anaheim,Fountain Valley,Garden Grove, Local Cities Huntington Beach and Orange, Union Pacific Railroad, Atchison,Topeka&Santa Fe Railway and a private SPRR/ATSFRR industrial park. Compensation for business loss shall be addressed in the agreements. R-3 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will prepare a plan to detour users of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction the Santa Ana River Bikeway,around the construction areas so that the paved trail remains open during County of Orange construction. The Districts shall work with the County of Orange and local bicycle group on the preparation of trail detour plan. At a minimum, the following County Departments shall be contacted to help prepare trail detour plan: • Public Facilities and Resources Department, Harbors,Beaches and Parks Department • Planning and Development Services Department. At a minimum,the following local bicycle group shall be contacted: • Orange County Bicycle Coalition,630 S.Glassel Street, Suite 100,Orange, CA 91666,(714)298-9130. The final Vail detour plan shall be submitted to the above groups for review and comment. R4 The construction contractor will ensure that adequate barriers are established to prevent recreational facility Construction Contractor During users from entering the active project construction area. Construction R-5 Following conswction,the censtruction areas in golf courses and the Santa Ana River Trail will be restored to Construction Contractor Post-Construction their original condition and re-landscaped as appropriate. Environments]Justice None, Indian Trust Assets None. Mitigation Monitoring Plan Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACOE U.S.Amy Corps of Engineers DigAlert Underground Service Alert GAC Granular Activated Carbon MF Membrane Filtration OCFCD Orange County Flood Control District OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCWD Orange County Water District SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District RO Reverse Osmosis System Groundwater Replenishment System USGS United States Geological Survey UV Ultraviolet Light H:wp.Qlal n'SSVtemlWons11999k0CSD99.01 doc last pnMM 0X11I9910.06 AM -tt{- RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-02 CERTIFYING FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, MARCH 24, 1999 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval of a water reclamation project, described as the Groundwater Replenishment System, hereinafter referred to as "GWR System"; and, WHEREAS, District and the Orange County Water District of Orange County, California (hereinafter referred to as Water District) are the lead agencies for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the GWR System, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, to assess the GWR System's environmental impacts objectively, Water District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the GWR System; and, WHEREAS, Water District has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as required by CEQA; and, 1 WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System, previously formed by the District and the Water District held a duly-noticed public hearing, to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the Draft Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, Water District has objectively evaluated the comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program EIR, either in full or in summary, together with Water District's responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process, have been included in the Final Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR and the Final Program EIR have been presented to the members of the Board of Directors of District for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Groundwater Replenishment System. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That the Board of Directors hereby certifies that the Final Program EIR on the Groundwater Replenishment System has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and District's CEQA procedures, and that the Board of Directors has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Program EIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Groundwater Replenishment System, and that the Final Program EIR reflects the District's 2 independent judgment and analysis. The Final Program EIR consists of the following two documents: 1. "Draft program Environmental Impact Report (and Tier I EIS) on the Groundwater Replenishment System" dated November 5, 1998; and, 2. "Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the Groundwater Replenishment System% dated February 1999. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 24, 1999. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeebngDate ToBa.orMr. 3/74/99 " AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iterry/yimber 7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: NIA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A 1VeM+`Wb1Fry AnVn123 W LYtlpe1NPFILESMhmapeq Ex nme.e ewse Page t ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 2/1/99 -2/15/99 &2/16/99—2/28/99. BA \Ya]anValatlwp EiaVin\]]Pulbgpe\NPFI\ESdaim,Wb da ae�,ae vwne Page 2 Claims Paid From 211199 to 2115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 17126 Advance Constructors,Inc. $ 191,548.80 Construction J-34.1,P2.35.5 17127 Black&Veatch 33,853.92 Engineering Services Pl-46 17128 Boyle Engineering Corporation 28,009.22 Engineering Services 7-27,Pt-41 &P2-48 17129 Bristol Systems, Inc. 32.153.69 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 17130 Brown and Caldwell 49.411.83 Engineering Services J-35-1 17131 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 287,027.00 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-3 17132 Carollo Engineers ID8,446.12 Engineering Services P1-43,J-25.4,J-50 17133 Delta Dental 38,001.42 Dental Insurance Plan 17134 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 72,720.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 17135 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 72.047.54 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 17136 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 262,097.67 Construction 7-17 17137 James Martin&Co. 104.907.50 Data Integration Project 17138 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 61.821.20 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 17139 Mid-West Associates 33.727.48 Pump Supplies 17140 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 302,763.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 17141 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 106.365.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 17142 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment 38.660.70 2 Vaughan Chopper Pumps 17143 Southern California Edison 58.881.37 Power 17144 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 60,075.14 Construction 7-7-1 17145 Systems Integrated 33.036.58 Construction Services J-31-3 17146 Tule Ranch/Magan Fanns 45.522.74 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 17147 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 28,438.34 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 17148 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 75.202.49 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 17149 The Vantage Group LLC 2,970.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 17150 Visia 8;160.00 Computer Consulting Services 17151 A&G Industries 2.661.43 Strainer Probes 17152 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.79 Long Distance Telephone Services 17153 American Telephone&Telegraph 1,503.56 Long Distance Telephone Services 17154 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.76 Long Distance Telephone Services 17155 American Telephone&Telegraph 469.76 Long Distance Telephone Services 17156 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 5,807.73 Software 17157 Advanced Sealing&Supply Cc., Inc. 869AS Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17158 Aidce Systems,Inc. 2.562.29 Engine Supplies 17159 Air Cold Supply 42.41 Air Conditioner Repairs 17160 Air Liquids America Corporation 1,629.77 Specialty Gasses 17161 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 17162 Airborne Express 78.25 Air Freight 17163 Alhambra Foundry Co Ltd 3.060.10 Manhole Frames&Covers 17164 Allied Supply Company 3,306.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 211/99 to 2115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 17165 American Airlines 3,614.00 Travel Services 17166 American Seals West 330.31 Gaskets 17167 Anicom,Inc. 1.142.37 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 17168 Appleone Employment Service 5,258.70 Temporary Employment Services 17169 Applied Industrial Technology 2,115.38 Pump Supplies 17170 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 1,400.00 Lab Supplies 17171 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 520.00 Vacuum Truck Services 17172 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal 17173 OuicksettAssoc.Concrete Production 202.57 Building Materials 17174 Allas Chrysler Plymouth 22,700.77 1998 Dodge 314 Ton Service Body Truck 17175 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 351.56 Filters 17176 AMA/Keye Productivity Center 169.00 Seminar Registration 17177 Basler Electric Company, Dept.590 839.82 Electrical Supplies 17178 Battery Specialties 458.24 Batteries 17179 CorDaxSentley Systems, Inc. 8,103.69 Software-J-42 17180 Bemardo Press 178.39 Publications 17101 Boulwell B Ennor LLP 3,375.00 Legal Services-401A Plan 17162 C.S.U.F.Foundation 8,750.00 Membership 17183 C&H Distributions 236.60 Electrical Supplies 17184 Calif Centrifugal Pump 19,456.29 Pump Supplies 17185 California Automatic Gate 189.40 Service Agreement 17186 Caltrol,Inc. 588.18 Valves 17187 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 585.00 Engineering Services P1fi3 17188 Centrepointe Commercial Interior 1,981.87 Office Furniture 17189 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.314.54 Instrument Parts 17190 City of Fountain Valley 15.992.40 Water Use 17191 Communications Performance Group 18,180.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program 17192 Compressor Components Of California 10,602.60 Pump Supplies 17193 Compuserve Incorporated 54.85 Computer Services 17194 Computers America, Inc. 8,046.30 Misc.Computer Supplies 17195 Connell GM Parts 72.10 Truck Supplies 17196 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2.475.16 Electrical Supplies 17197 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 99.88 Plumbing Supplies 17198 Cooper Cameron Corporation 7,496.12 Engine Supplies 17199 Corporate Express Imaging 11,SW.70 Misc.Computer Supplies 17200 Corporate Express 1.090.17 Office Supplies 17201 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 17202 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 241.53 Truck Parts 17203 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 165.03 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 17204 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 254.00 Underground Storage Tank Fee Page 2 of 9 �'1 _ Claims Paid From 211199 to 2f15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17205 County of Orange 911.18 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 17206 County Wholesale Electric Co. 8,601.93 Electrical Supplies 17207 CNA Trust 21,283.20 Construction 5-41-1 17208 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 539.85 Lab Supplies 17209 CR 8 R. Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 17210 Daniels Tire Service 419.59 Truck Tires 17211 Del Mar Analytical 2,523.00 Biosolids Analysis 17212 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 18,586.88 5 Dell Latitude Notebooks 17213 Delta Foam Products 84.74 Lab Supplies 17214 Dept.of Fish and Game 78.00 Maps 17215 Diamond H Recognition 347.92 Employee Service Awards 17216 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 255.41 Paint Supplies 17217 DISCAN Corporation 2,875.05 Computer Services 17218 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 299.00 Medical Screening 17219 Electra-Test, Inc. 5,759.00 Electrical Supplies 17220 Environmental Data Solutions Grp. 20,884.00 Professional Services-Air Duality Info. Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project 17221 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 3,185.34 Maim.Service Agreement 17222 Federal Express Corp. 37.70 Air Freight 17223 Fisher Scientific 546.72 Lab Supplies 17224 Flat and Vertical, Inc. sell Concrete Cutting 17225 Forkert Engineering 8 Surveying,Inc. 7,710.00 Engineering Services P-150 17226 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18.205.91 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 17227 Fountain Valley Camera 13.31 Photo Supplies 17228 Franklin-Miller Incorporated 18,000.00 3 Biosolids Grinder Rebuilds 17229 Frys Electronics 1,121.25 Computer Supplies 17230 City of Fullerton 95.48 Water Use 17231 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 557.61 Road Base Materials 17232 Ganahl Lumber Company 388.20 Lumber/Hardware 17233 Garraa-Callahan Company 693.37 Chemicals 17234 General Binding Corporation 412.43 Printing 17235 GTE California 1.679.56 Telephone Services 17236 Geomatrix Consultants 3,06'1.31 Legal Services 17237 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 17238 Governing 15.00 Subscription 17239 WIN Grainger Inc. 1,129.97 Compressor Supplies 17240 Graphic Distributors 1,291.92 Photographic Supplies 17241 Graseby S.T.I. 1,582.45 Engine Supplies 17242 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 287.01 Janitorial Supplies 17243 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice 17244 Harrington Industrial Plastic, Inc. 8,062.83 Plumbing Supplies Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 211/99 to 2115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17245 Hello Direct, Inc. 531.14 Telephone Headsets 17246 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 85.33 Catering Services 17247 Hewlett-Packard 1,448.00 Registration 17248 Hilbert&Associates, Inc. 17,495.00 Engineering Services P2-61 17249 HIM 3.643.52 Tools 17250 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 19.53 Compressor Parts 17251 The Holman Group 734.14 Employee Assistance Program Premium 17252 Holmes&Newer, Inc. 11,398.98 Engineering Services 2-41 17253 Home Depot 442.66 Small Hardware 17254 Hub Auto Supply 351.17 Truck Parts 17255 City of Huntington Beach 13.261.59 Water Use 17256 Idexx 569.36 Lab Supplies 17257 Image Plus Engraving 350.00 Engraving Machine Training 17256 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 11,054.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17259 Infikro Degremont, Inc. 948.53 Mechanical Parts 17260 Informatics Corporation 4,080.57 Software On-Stie Training 17261 StateNet 165.00 Online Service 17262 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 931.75 Lab Supplies 17263 Intergraph Corporation 7.948.66 Software 17264 Interstate Battery Systems 565.36 Batteries 17265 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 17266 IBM Corporation 300.00 Service Contract 17267 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 12,131.07 Safety Supplies 17268 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,851.34 Instrument Supplies 17269 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 17,595.00 Misc.Construction Services 17270 Johnstone Supply 598.78 Electrical Supplies 17271 Jordan Controls,Inc. 335.37 Instrument Maint 17272 Kelly Paper 892.80 Paper 17273 Knox Industrial Supplies 462.27 Tools 17274 Stephen V.Kozak 225.00 Training Expense Reimb. 17275 Leadership Companies, Inc. 5,600.00 Software 17276 Lee&Ro,Inc. 18,625.32 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 17277 Lewis Publishers 84.32 Publication 17278 Lexis-Nexis 346.05 Books&Publications 17279 Lifecom-Safety, Inc. 1,200.25 Safety Supplies 17280 Lustre-Cal 825.27 Safety Supplies 17281 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,674.58 Cellular Telephone Service 17282 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 3.274.28 Engineering Services 2-37 17283 Mamco International 692.11 Janitorial Supplies 17284 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 766.28 Mechanical Supplies Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 211199 to 2/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17285 Mentek 677.09 Safety Supplies 17288 Mar Vac Electronics 35,53 Instrument Supplies 17287 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 99.94 Plumbing Supplies 17288 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 559.83 Pump Supplies 17289 Medlin Controls Co. 302,57 Instrument Supplies 17290 Robert Michna 129,29 Office Supplies Reimb. 17291 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves 17292 Mission Abrasive Supplies 5,187.90 Tools&Supplies 17293 Mission Uniform Service 4,344.48 Uniform Rentals 17294 Mitchell Instrument Co. 459.39 Instruments 17295 Monitor Labs, Inc. 3,892.17 Instrument Malnt. 17296 MotoPhoto 93.07 Photographic Services 17297 MPS Photographic Services 28.03 Photographic Services 17298 Nasce 237.83 Instrument Supplies 17299 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 695.00 Training Registration 17300 Neal Supply Co. 120.51 Plumbing Supplies 17301 Network Installation Corporation 1,093.99 Safety Equipment 17302 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,270.14 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 17303 Occupational Melon Services 1,295.39 Safety Glasses 17304 Office Depot Business Services Div. 603.70 Office Supplies 17305 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,924.67 Electrical Supplies 17306 Ortiz Fire Protection 833.00 Service Agreement 17307 Oxygen Service Company 1,264.82 Specialty Gases 17308 OCB Reprographics 738.07 Printing Service-Spec P-173 17309 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 316.52 Electrical Supplies - 17310 Pacific Bell 1,239.35 Telephone Services 17311 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services 17312 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5.434.66 Plumbing Supplies 17313 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 564.80 Tires 17314 Parts Unlimited 142.93 Truck Supplies 17315 Pizza Hut of America, Inc. 144.00 Catering Services 17316 Poly Enterprises, Inc., 641.11 Safety Supplies 17317 Polydyne,Inc. 22,557.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 17318 Port Supply 296.31 Rope 17319 Power Measurement Limited 137.08 Electrical Supplies 17320 Putzmeister 707.24 Electrical Supplies 17321 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service 17322 OAir-Calif.Div. Pump Engineering 20,544.49 Air Compressor 17323 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 108.49 Instrument Supplies 17324 R.F.MacDonald Co. 200.04 Electrical Supplies Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 2/1199 to 2/15199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17325 Radius Maps 135.00 Map 17326 Red Wing Shoes 128.44 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 17327 Reliance Electric 4,444.82 Electrical Supplies 17328 Reliastar 20,938.27 Life Insurance Premium 17329 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.172.06 Life Insurance Premium 17330 Remedy Temp 9,189.68 Temporary Employment Services 17331 Robert's Auto Tnm Shop 706.06 Auto Repair 17332 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 103.71 Video Production Service 17333 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,200.00 Engineenng Services-Design Documents 17334 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 244.21 Paint Supplies 17335 Safety-Kleen 12.640.09 Service Agreement 17336 Sagent Technology 2.195.00 Registration 17337 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 408.90 Mechanical Supplies 17338 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 469.26 Specialty Gases 17339 Second-Sun 165.18 Light Fixtures 17340 Sensorex 214.71 Electrical Supplies 17341 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 309.05 Tools 17342 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,647.89 ToolsfHardware 17343 Supelco, Inc. 1.720.15 Lab Supplies 17344 Srrinh Pipe&Supply, Inc. 79.13 Plumbing Supplies 17345 So.Cal.Gas Company 4,805.31 Natural Gas 17346 Seem Plastic Coating Co. 199.34 Electrical Supplies 17347 Sow-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Services 17348 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 250.00 Meter 17349 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 325.57 Lab Supplies 17350 Stama Cells,Inc. 174.38 Lab Supplies 17351 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 212.92 Office Supplies 17352 Street Smart Professional Equipment 6,306.70 Photography Equipment 17353 Summit Steel 737.71 Metal 17354 Super Chem Corporation 670.80 Chemicals 17355 Superintendent of Documents 10.00 Subscription 17358 SARBS-PDC 11,000.00 Training Registration 17357 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 159.36 Publication 17358 Foxboro Company 2,184.82 Instrument Supplies 17359 The Kermit Project 525.00 Software 17360 The Pittsburgh Conference 75.00 Registration 17361 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 1.800.00 Registration 17382 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 3,195.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 17303 Truk 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 234.71 Truck Supplies 17354 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 2,070.00 Lab Services Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 211199 to 2115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17365 Tuthill Corp 536.43 Valve 17366 Teksystems 1,760.00 Temporary Employment Services 17367 Ultra Scientific 208.00 Lab Supplies 17368 Union Dodge 23,664.06 1999 Dodge 2500 Quad Cab Truck 17369 United Parcel Service 673.64 Parcel Services 17370 University of Wisconsin Madison 2,085.00 Registration 17371 US Rental, Inc. 402.98 Dump Truck Rental 17372 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,091.94 Plumbing Supplies 17373 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,600.28 Vision Service Premium 17374 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,798.47 Door Repair 17375 VWR Scientific 8,332.10 Lab Supplies 17376 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,950.85 Security Guards 17377 Wayne Electric Co. 166.94 Electrical Supplies 17378 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 215.44 Safety Supplies 17379 West-Cite Supply Company,Inc. 17.81 Electrical Supplies 17380 Western States Chemical,Inc. 14,892.16 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 17381 Xerox Corporation(Purch) 12,365.29 Copier Leases 17382 ZD Joumals 69.00 Subscription 17383 Blake Anderson 1,149.91 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17384 James Cong 166.00 Employee Travel Advance 17385 Deirdre E.Hunter 2,088.85 Employee Computer Loan Program 17386 Robert G.Kizanis 161.96 Training Expense Reimb. 17387 Donald F.McIntyre 646.06 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17388 Michael D. Moore 581.44 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17389 Michael L.Fetterman 312.63 Training Expense Reimb. 17390 Frank G.Schultz 1,364.74 Employee Computer Loan Program 17391 Michelle Tuchman 104.25 Cellular Expense Reimb. 17392 County of Orange 1,500.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 17393 Huntington Beach,City of 60.00 Permit Fee 17394 LAPA 290.00 Registration 17395 Orange County Sanitation District 1,685.96 Petty Cash Reimb. 17396 Bio Gro Division 42,204.17 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 17397 Orange County Sanitation District 382,138.63 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 17398 Allen Press,Inc. 119.00 Printing Service 17399 Anicom, Inc. 13.79 Freight 17400 The Assoc.of Records Mgrs.&Admin. 160.00 Membership 17401 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 17402 CWEA 45.00 Membership 17403 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 17404 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 326.44 Electrical Supplies Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 2M/99 to 2/15/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17405 Controloo 490.31 Mechanical Supplies 17406 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 17407 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 17408 Enchanter,Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 17409 Enterprise Technology Services 1,937.50 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support 17410 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 17411 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 17412 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 1,76129 Connectors 17413 Information Strategy 207.95 Subscription 17414 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 17415 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.788.75 Dues Deduction 17416 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 429.34 Safety Supplies 17417 Lessons in Leadership 1,674.00 Registration 17418 Mar Vac Electronics 170.90 Instrument Supplies 17419 Mark B. Plummer,Esq.B Laraine Pipoly 10,042.21 Legal Services 17420 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 599.35 Tools 17421 Orange County Sanitation District 21.147.72 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 17422 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 17423 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 17424 Orange County Wholesale Electric 456.58 Electrical Supplies 17425 OCB Reprographics 3,508.77 Printing Service-Spec P-173 17426 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction 17427 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 17428 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 17429 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction 17430 Putzmeister 378.84 Pump Supplies 17431 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 26.18 Mechanical Supplies 17432 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 531.98 Tools/Hardware 17433 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,360.64 Natural Gas 17434 Southern California Edson 10,923.45 Power 17435 Spinlex Company,Inc. 2,598.03 Janitorial Supplies 17436 State of California 104.64 Hazardous Waste Tax 17437 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,882.86 Mechanical Supplies 17438 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions 17439 UNL Center for Leadership Dev. 759.00 Registration 17440 Water Environment Research Foundation 89.50 Publication 17441 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3.135.53 Instrument Supplies 17442 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 79.93 Publications 17443 3CMA 75.00 Registration 17444 Marcus D.Dubois 553.55 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 211199 to 2116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17445 Stephen V.Kozak 106,64 Training Expense Reimb. 17446 Wiliam S.Malik 1.631.44 Employee Computer Loan Program 17447 Patrick W. McNally 425.59 Meeting Expense Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,427,191.79 Payroll Disbursements 12891-13032 Employee Paychecks $ 179,288.62 Biweekly Payroll 2/10/99 13033-13033 Employee Paycheck 3,133.31 Termination 34645-35087 Direct Deposit Statements 616,745.06 Biweekly Payroll 2/10/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 799,167A 9 Wire Transfer Payments Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 151,486.19 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 56,965.07 Quarterly LOC Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Chasefrexas Commerce Bank 206.977.80 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank&Trust 179,609.89 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 595,038.95 Total Claims Paid 211199-21IW99 $ 4,821,397.93 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 2116/99 to 2128199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 17448 Boyle Engineering Corporation $ 36,966.89 Engineering Services 6-12&7-7-1 17449 Brown and Caldwell 106.349.76 Engineering Services Pt-37&J-35-1 17450 Della Dental 37.991.36 Dental Insurance Plan 17451 Fonis Benefits Insurance Company 27,491.80 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 17452 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 53,554.80 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 17453 Margate Construction 80.061.00 Construction P1-41,P2-48&P2-53-2 17454 Pacific Investment Management Co. 115,568.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95-97 17455 Pacificare of Ca. 37,24BA7 Health Insurance Premium 17456 Painewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 17457 Parsons Engineering Science 114,947.94 Engineering Services J42 17458 Pima Gro Systems Inc. 76.132.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 17459 Southern California Edison 51,499.32 Power 17460 ThirdWave 89.910.50 Professional Services-Document Management Project 17461 Tole Ranch/Magan Farms 59,961.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 17462 United HeallhCare 129.274.57 Medical Health Insurance 17463 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 42,981.35 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 17464 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 4.24 Long Distance Telephone Services 17465 Abeam 88.32 Hardware 17466 ACCU STANDARD 460.47 Lab Supplies 17467 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1.260.00 Training Registration 17468 Air Liquids America Corporation 675.19 Specialty Gasses 17469 Airborne Express 103.75 Air Freight 17470 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 1,311.55 Electrical Parts&Supplies 17471 Alhambra Foundry Co Ltd 2,381.28 Manhole Frames&Covers 17472 Allied Supply Company 1.450.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17473 American Management Association 159.00 Registration 17474 American Management Association 497.00 Registration 17475 Analysts, Inc. 2,286.84 Testing Kits 17476 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 495.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 17477 Appleone Employment Service 6,912.53 Temporary Employment Services 17478 Applied Industrial Technology 454.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 17479 Asbury Environmental Services 140.00 Waste Oil Removal 17460 Awards&Trophies By Bea 37.71 Plaques 17481 AKM Consulting Engineers 10,497.00 Consulting Services 11-20& 11.17-3 17482 ASR Analysis 900.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1 17483 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 2.015.98 Telephone Installation 17484 Battelle 4,500.00 Engineering Services Pi-51 17485 Battery Specialties 326.13 Batteries 17486 BloSource Consulting 5,995.45 Consulting Servlcce-Biosolids&Watershed Page 1 of 8 s Claims Paid From 2110199 to 2128199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17487 Bristol Systems, Inc. 4,380.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 17488 Bureau Of Business Practice 137.50 Publication 17489 Buy.Com 5,075.68 Computer Supplies 17490 BC Wire Rope 8 Rigging 5,662.21 Rope 17491 BICEPP 50.00 Membership-Bus.8 Industry Council for Emerg.Planning 8 Preparedness 17492 C&H Distributions 62.26 Electrical Supplies 17493 Calif Centrifugal Pump 3,701.92 Pump Supplies 17494 California Automatic Gate 463.48 Service Agreement 17495 California Journal 39.95 Publication 17496 Career Track Seminars MS2 396.00 Registration 17497 Cad Warren 8 Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 17498 Carollo Engineers 236.38 Engineering Services J-34-1 17499 Clements Environmental 2,669.80 Consultant-Wheeler Ridge Project 17500 Compressor Components Of California 2,165.78 Pump Supplies 17501 Computers America, Inc. 4,980.83 Computer Supplies 17502 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 1.759.13 Electrical Supplies 17603 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,406.86 Engine Supplies 17504 Omray,Inc. 39.95 Subscription 17505 Corporate Express 941.97 Office Supplies 17506 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11.700.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 17507 Cost Containment Solutions 1,033.70 Worker's Comp.Services 17508 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 17509 County of Orange 665.00 Permit Fees 17510 County of Orange 628.86 Sevier Service Fees Admin. 17511 County Wholesale Electric Co. 10,358.74 Electrical Supplies 17512 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 17513 CH2MHill 20,000.00 Engineering Services-112S Scrubber Monitor Project 17614 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 1.542.92 Lab Supplies 17515 OR 8 R.Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 17516 CWEA Annual Conference 1.995.00 Conference Registration 17517 Datavault 146.50 Ofrsite Back-Up Tape Storage 17518 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 22,764.51 6 Dell P6400 GX1 Workstations 8 5 HP LaserJet 4,000 Printers 17519 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1,3T7.68 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 17520 DMG-Maximus 8,800.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan 17521 E. Daniel Erikson 17.61 Computer Supplies 17522 Empire Scales, Inc. 160.00 Electrical Supplies 17523 Enchanter, Inc. 3.500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 17524 Enterprise Technology Services, LLC 875.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support 17525 Environmental Express 1.713.00 Lab Supplies 17528 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,777.51 Professional Services-Legislative Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 2118/99 to 2128/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17527 Federal Express Corp. 131.05 Air Freight 17528 First American Real Estate Solutions 135.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription 17529 First Fire Systems,Inc. 8,745.67 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 17530 Fisher Scientific 1,126.78 Lab Supplies 17531 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 410.00 Engineering Services P-150 17532 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 248.95 Truck Wash Tickets 17533 Franklin Covey 447.95 Office Supplies 17534 Frigid Units, Inc. 7,562.39 Lab Supplies 17535 Fry's Electronics 616.92 Computer Supplies 17636 FM International, Inc. 5,525.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 17537 Ganahl Lumber Company 184.25 Lumber/Hardware 17638 Garratt-Callahan Company 4,494.26 Chemicals 17539 GTE California 3,035A9 Telephone Services 17540 Genium Publishing Corp. 286.00 Publication 17541 George Yardley Co. 620.71 Lab Supplies 17542 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,209.53 Pump Supplies 17543 WIN Grainger, Inc. 1,390.89 Compressor Supplies 17544 Graseby STI 5,168.53 Engine Supplies 17545 Great American Printing Co. 302.76 Printing Service 17546 GE Multilin, Inc.(Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair 17547 Hach Company 253.07 Lab Supplies 17548 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,603.09 Plumbing Supplies 17649 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 293.67 Truck Supplies 17550 Voided Check - - 17551 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 48.29 Catering Services 17552 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, LLC 20,680.16 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 17563 Home Depot 188.75 Small Hardware 17554 Hunt's Final Phase 447.38 Construction-Admin. Bldg. Kitchen Floor Rehab 17565 Idexx 5,277.78 Lab Supplies 17556 Imaging Plus, Inc. 863.79 Office Supplies 17557 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 8.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17568 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 461.87 Lab Supplies 17559 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.30 Water Use 17580 IBM Corporation 6,375.37 Service Contract 17561 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 467.99 Safety Supplies 17562 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,620.58 Instrument Supplies 17563 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 300.00 Training Expenses 17664 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 9.925.07 Misc.Construction Services 17565 Jensen Instrument Co. 571.24 Instrument Supplies 17566 Jobs Available,Inc. 147.20 Notices&Ads Page 3 of 8 er Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2/28199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17557 Johnstone Supply 347.16 Electrical Supplies 17568 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,641.21 Medical Insurance Premium 17569 Kathco 246.22 Janitorial Supplies 17570 Kelly Paper 19.72 Paper 17571 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,536.10 Tools 17572 Lee&Ro,Inc. 1,407.80 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 17573 Uns-X Protective Coatings 871.82 Truck Supplies 17574 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 1,341.05 Engineering Services J-53 17575 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,519.21 Mechanical Supplies 17578 McKenna Engineering&Equipment Co., Inc. 6,76C80 Pump Supplies 17577 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 283.11 Tools 17578 Mc Welce Rack-N-Box Company 1.192.36 Auto Parts&Supplies 17579 Microsoft Corporation 1,990.00 Software 17680 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,135.95 Mechanical Repairs 17581 Mission Uniform Service 2,978.10 Uniform Rentals 17582 The Monster Board 175.00 Job Posting on the Internet 17583 Mellon Industries 331.83 Pump Supplies 17584 MotoPhoto 11.67 Photographic Services 17585 MPS Photographic Services 11.86 Photographic Services 17586 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 17587 National Plant Services,Inc. 1.690.00 Vacuum Truck Services 17588 Neal Supply Co. 2,336.63 Plumbing Supplies 17589 Network Associates 4,100.00 Computer Consulting Services 17590 New Hermes,Inc. 121.33 Tools 17591 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 6.900.74 LubricanUDiesel Fuel 17592 Ninyo&Moore 2.079.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 17593 The Norco Companies 119.15 Mail Delivery Service 17594 NROC 10.00 Publication 17595 O.C. Business Journal 74.00 Subscription 17596 Occupational Vision Services 645.48 Safety Glasses 17597 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,652.13 Office Supplies 17598 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 71.25 Plumbing Supplies 17599 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 7,242.96 Electrical Supplies 17600 Orange Courier 51.30 Courier Services 17601 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 316.54 Fittings 17602 Oxygen Service Company 518.74 Specialty Gases 17603 OCB Reprographics 170.87 Printing Service-Spec P-173 17604 OI Analytical 547.75 Lab Supplies 17605 Pacific Bell 17.43 Telephone Services 17606 Pacific Mechanical Supply 468.00 Plumbing Supplies Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 2116199 to 2120199 Warrant No. vendor Amount Description 17607 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 15,721.10 Software 17608 Parts Unlimited 418.19 Truck Supplies 17609 Pitney Bowes 352.35 Postage Machine Service Agreement 17610 Platinum Technology, Inc. 1,251.00 Software 17611 Polydyne,Inc. 23,386,06 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 17612 Port Supply 35.68 Rope 17613 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 17614 Quality Building Supply 199.77 Building Supplies 17615 R.F. MacDonald Co. 199.98 Electrical Supplies 17616 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,324.22 Trash Removal 17617 Red Wing Shoes 118.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 17618 Regents of the University of Calif. 225.00 Registration 17619 Reliastar 7,984.00 Life Insurance Premium 17620 Remedy Temp 2.300.48 Temporary Employment Services 17621 RBF Engineers 7,100.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 17622 RPM Electric Motors 2.610.59 Electric Motor Repair 17623 RS Hughes Cc Inc 47.51 Paint Supplies 17624 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 65.34 Mechanical Supplies 17625 Schwing America, Inc. 3,051.94 Pump Supplies 17626 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,301.35 Specialty Gases 17627 Sears Industrial Sales 269.19 Mechanical Supplies 17628 Second-Sun 85.16 Light Fixtures 17629 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 6,770.94 Tools/Hardware 17630 So.Cal.Gas Company 12,165.21 Natural Gas 17631 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 11,068.47 Emission Fees 17632 Sprint 34.50 Long Distance Telephone Service 17633 State Board of Equalization 983.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 17634 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 17635 Strategic Research Institute 1,395.00 Registration 17636 Street Smart Professional Equipment 263.45 Safety Equipment 17637 Summit Steel 106.24 Metal 17638 Swains Electric Motor Service 710.85 Pump 17639 SCAP 24,000.00 Membership-So.Calif.Alliance of POTW 17640 SMC Networks 1,584.75 Computer Supplies 17641 Tasew, Inc. 1.820.47 Valves 17642 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 890.23 Electric Cart Parts 17643 Telebyte Technology,Inc. 1,508.97 Security System Equipment 17644 Teledyne Analytical 164.45 Instrument Parts 17645 Foxboro Company 1,207.37 Instrument Supplies 17646 The Register 837.90 Notices 8 Ads Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 2N6W to 2128199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17647 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4.622.96 Mechanical Supplies 17648 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 72.78 Locks 8 Keys 17649 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 4.900.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 17650 TDWI Fourth Annual Implementation Conf. 1.475.00 Registration 17651 Teksystems 2.640.00 Temporary Employment Services 17652 The Unisource Corporation 376.73 Office Supplies 17653 United Parcel Service 33.97 Parcel Services 17654 Valmm 6,065.46 Software-Microsoft Project 98 17655 Valley Cities Supply Company 928.20 Plumbing Supplies 17656 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 536.00 Instrument Maint.Service 17657 Veme's Plumbing 140.00 Plumbing Supplies 17658 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,600.28 Vision Service Premium 17659 VWR Scientific 8,147.47 Lab Supplies 17660 The Wackenhut Corporation 9.036.40 Security Guards 17661 Wayne Electric Co. 1,086.12 Electrical Supplies 17662 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 22.00 Electrical Supplies 17663 Western Business Systems 368.65 Office Supplies 17664 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3,135.53 Instrument Supplies 17665 Xerox Corporation 5,788.97 Copier Leases 17666 Xpedex Paper 8 Graphics 108.61 Office Supplies 17667 20th Century Plastics,Inc. 91.16 Office Supplies 17668 Blake Anderson 644.17 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17669 Layne T.Baroldi 735.74 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17670 Mark Castillo 170.00 Meeting Expense 17671 Terri L.Josway 219.89 Training Expense Reimb. 17672 Michael D.Moore 787.04 .Meeting Expense Reimb. 17673 Edward M.Tones 413.58 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17674 Orange County Sanitation District 1.547.89 Petty Cash Reimb. 17675 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 17,241.46 Emission Fees 17676 Helga Hass 8 Micro Center 2,882.77 Employee Computer Loan Program 17677 Orange County Sanitation District 392,889.50 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 17678 Orange County Water District 146,535.88 Consulting Services J-36 17679 Andy's Salvage Pick Up 1.800.00 Construction Services-Material Removal 17680 Amcor Vac Sweeping Service 1.092.00 Vacuum Truck Services 17681 Eames 8 Noble Books 211.71 Publication 17682 BearCom 14,107.50 Communication Equipment 17683 Bentley Systems,Inc. 493.85 Software Maint. 17684 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 17685 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 17686 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 231.31 Electrical Supplies Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2/28199 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description 17687 Converse Consultants 5,076.62 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 17688 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 17689 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 17690 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 17691 Franklin Covey 103.65 Office Supplies 17692 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 17693 GTE California 5.060.14 Telephone Services 17894 Geri Lopker&Associates 3,144.11 Engineering Services-Customer Relations 17695 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 104.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17696 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 17697 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,803.06 Dues Deduction 17698 Irvine Ranch Water District 20.08 Water Use 17699 law,Inc. 498.71 Lab Supplies 17700 Maintenance Technology Corp. 163.06 Welding Supplies 17701 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1.616.94 Tools 17702 Motion Industries 167.00 Pump Supplies 17703 Mouse Graphics 775.26 Printing Services 17704 Jolyn Murphy 527.50 SA River Watershed Meeting 17705 Office Depot Business Services Div. 91.87 Office Supplies 17706 Orange County Family Support 1,186.78 Wage Garnishment 17707 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 17708 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 911.94 Electrical Supplies 17709 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 350.84 Fittings 17710 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction 17711 Pacific Bell 1,192.04 Telephone Services 17712 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 17713 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 17714 Peace Officers Council of CA 819.00 Dues Deduction 17715 Pinkerton Systems Integration 262.60 Door Repair 17716 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 2,792.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents 17717 RS Hughes Co Inc 165.92 Paint Supplies 17718 City of Seal Beach 174.94 Water Use 17719 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 28.53 Tools 17720 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2.198.95 Tools/Hardware 17721 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 17722 So.Cal.Gas Company 59.45 Natural Gas 17723 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment 17724 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 750.00 COP Trustee Services 17725 Textile Engineering Associates 1,083.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 17726 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 165.04 Mechanical Supplies Page 7 of 8 < Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2128199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 17727 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions 17728 University of Wisconsin Madison 795.00 Training Registration 17729 UNL Center for Leadership Development 79.00 Training Registration 17730 Western States Chemical, Inc. 20,805.02 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 17731 Nicholas J.Arhontes 435.76 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17732 Jeffrey Brown 499.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17733 Michael D.Moore 202.91 Meeting Expense Reimb. 17734 Michael D.White 250.00 Meeting Expense Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,303,110.15 Payroll Disbursements 13034-13056 Directors'Paychecks $ 6,019.49 Payroll 2118/99 13057-13197 Employee Paychecks 186,010.22 Biweekly Payroll 2/24199 13198.13199 Directors'Paychecks 222.23 Payroll 2/18/99 Mlssing Time Sheets 3608635532 Direct Deposit Statements 635,653.29 Biweekly Payroll 2110/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 827,906.23 Wlra Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 2116/99-PJ28199 It 3,131,021.38 Page 8 of 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meet gDate TO6O3/24/990r .Dir. AGENDA REPORT Item Number ItemN mber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: NOTICE OF HEARING AND PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM CLAIM REQUIREMENT RE MICHAEL ROZENGURT V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief from Claim Requirement filed on behalf of former employee Michael Rozengurt (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 806118), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY On October 9, 1998, Mr. Rozengurt fled a claim with the District alleging wrongful termination. This claim was returned by the District as being insufficient. An "amended" claim was thereafter returned as being untimely. On January 27, 1999, the Board denied Mr. Rozengurt's Application for Permission to Present a Late Claim. The subject Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief was served on the District on March 2, 1999. The purpose is to petition the Court for an order of relief from filing a timely claim. If the Court grants the relief order, a suit shall be filed within 30 days. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel dated March 4, 1999. GGS:SK:BG c trertrnrt am.w owew.mc NrvrE: bJ690 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 24, 1999 An adjourned meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peer Swan, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT: Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Bob Doter, Director of Operations and Maintenance Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the of the January 27, 1999 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. i Minutes of the Steering Committee ° Page 2 February 24, 1999 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there is a water tour planned by the Water Education Foundation that might be of interest to the directors. He will announce this tour at the Board meeting tonight. Mr. McIntyre also reported that we have received preliminary notice that we may be fined something as a result of the spill on PCH. The RWOCB staff felt that the District did have some liability. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, added that the staff report on the spill will recommend that the three parties share any fine that may be imposed. Mr. Ghirelli indicated that District procedures have been revised and staff is working with Underground Service Alert staff to get legislative amendments on their procedures as well. The Directors will be advised when the final determination by the Regional Board is received. Mr. McIntyre indicated that the District staff did not disagree with the regulators. Blake Anderson updated the Committee members on activities relating to the Park Place development. IRWD staff has continued to meet with District staff to resolve some of the 15 issues relating to the exchange of facilities. A white paper will be prepared and presented to the Steering Committee at its March meeting that will discuss the pros and cons of the issues relating to the proposed exchange. Trammel Crow has agreed to 'one last extension' of the tolling agreement, through March 9. In order for staff to complete the work with IRWD, they will need at least 90 days and preferably 120 days. A preliminary timeline has been developed. Director Swan announced that he has voluntarily removed himself from this issue, and Director Shea is no longer taking part in negotiations either. The Committee directed staff to request a 120-day extension to the tolling agreement to make an orderly assessment of the issues, prepare a white paper and put together the three agreements that are contemplated for the transfer of Park Place from Area 7 to Area 14, including the financial impacts. If agreement cannot be reached with Trammel Crow, then a lawsuit may result. Mr. Anderson updated the Committee members on the Kern County biosolids issues. Mr. Ghirelli and Mike Moore reported on the most recent Board of Supervisors meeting, at which District staff made an excellent presentation. The meeting was videotaped and it will be made available for future meetings. A final vote by the Kern County Supervisors on land application of Class B biosolids is expected within the next 3.6 months. Mr. McIntyre indicated that staff is continuing to look for sites for a possible composting operation, and may consider joint ownership with other agencies. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. He did, however, indicate that he had just received the response from the arbitrator on the SPMT negotiations, but has not had a chance to review it. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 24, 1999 (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-E) A. Five-year Retrospective. Michelle Tuohman discussed the preparation of this document to address the changes that have occurred in the past five years, as well as discussing where the agency is at present and what direction it is headed. This is mostly technical information that is prepared by O&M for the annual report but would be written in layman's terms. It would also include additional background information to help the Directors with decision making on future issues. The Committee members decided that at this time this document was not necessary. The information staff is presenting to the Directors is sufficient. Rather than an overview, specific audiences should be considered first. B. Y2K Action Plan Update. Patrick Miles indicated that work is proceeding and,with the exception of embedded items, things are going smoothly. The objectives of the Action Plan were reviewed. Al this time it doesn't appear that the budget will be exceeded. A contingency plan is being developed and will be presented to the Directors in April. It was noted that staff will be on site on December 31, 1999 and will monitor world-wide events in an effort to head off any problems that others may experience. The assessment has turned up a non-compliance problem with the control system for the central power generation engines. The manufacturer is correcting this. C. Servino Areas outside OCSD Sphere of Influence. Don McIntyre stated that we continue to receive sewer service requests from developers of property outside the boundaries of the District. in some cases, the local sewering agencies oppose our providing this service, for reasons other than environmental and public health. The existing policy allows exceptions with Board concurrence. Staff will prepare a white paper on the various issues and report back to the Steering Committee. D. FY 98-99 Objectives for General Managers Performance Evaluation. The Committee reviewed the objectives and asked that revisions be made. Objective No. 6 is to be removed. Staff will revise the document and return it to the Committee for approval at the next meeting. E. Review Aoenda Items Scheduled to be presented to Committees in March. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were reviewed. Director Collins asked that the issue of consolidated user fees be considered by the FAHR Committee. After some discussion the General Manager indicated that this study would be included in the Finance Department's work plan for 99-00. Director Swan submitted a list of suggested discussion items for the retreat and staff will be assigning these issues to the various working committees for additional discussion and possible consideration as time permits- (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY Proposed Organizational Restructuring. This discussion was continued from the adjourned February 22 retreat. The Steering Committee reviewed six options, which were only a sampling of the possibilities. The two areas that are being considered are 1)what the structure of the organization is going to look like, and 2) identify the work groups within the agency from the standpoint of W Minutes of the Steering Committee ` Page 4 February 24, 1999 manageability. A decision will be required on whether to run the agency'lean and mean' or have one or two assistant general managers. It as stated that the General Manager should make the final decision on how the organization should be structured according to his/her management style, and that person has not yet been decided. Don McIntyre said that this issue would impact the budget assumptions and development. It was decided that this subject needed additional discussion at the next Steering Committee meeting, March 24, and to give it adequate time, the meeting will begin at 4:30 p.m. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m., one-half hour earlier than usual. It is scheduled to be a combined meeting with the Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee. (13) CLOSED SESSION A Closed Session was agendized, however, because the discussion item was also on the Board agenda, the Committee chose to defer discussion. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Submitted by: // J J a Tappan t ring Committee Secretary e.�.ee.�evsreEruus cauurnrnocvenmoaacc sc wm,rt...e: DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE/EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE RETREAT Saturday, February 20, 1999 A meeting of the Steering Committee and the Executive Management Team of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Saturday, February 20, 1999 at 9 a.m., in the District's Administrative Office. CALL TO ORDER Chair Jan Debay called the retreat to order at 9:06 a.m. and welcomed the Steering Committee and Executive Management Team members to the meeting. Those present were: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peer Swan, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT: Tom Saltarelf, Chairman, FAHR Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reviewed the purpose and the intent of the retreat—to discuss and determine policy pertaining to organizational issues and the future direction of the agency. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel indicated that all members of the Executive Management Team have also been designated as members of the Negotiation Team, as follows Minutes of the Steering Committee W Page 2 February 20, 1999 Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance. Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary CLOSED SESSION The Negotiating Committee then adjourned into closed session at 9:08 a.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss proposed changes to the compensation program for 501- and OCEA- represented employees. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of the Board of Directors will report on the actions when they are approved. At 10:30 a.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. DISCUSSION ITEMS Don McIntyre announced that negotiations with 501 and OCFA will be headed by Dan Cassidy, an outside consultant. Organizational Issues: Succession Plan for 2000. Mr. McIntyre indicated a need for succession planning because of the department of Mike Pelerman, Director of Human Resources, on January 1, 2000 and himself in May 2000. With budget development underway, this may be the time to consider reorganizing the agency. It was Mr. McIntyre's recommendation that the Steering Committee consider appointing Blake Anderson the future next general manager well before his contract expires May 12, 2000. The six months of recruiting that would be necessary if going outside the agency would create additional anxiety for employees. Organizational Structure. Blake Anderson described a proposed change in the organization that would reduce the number of departments to 5 and eliminate the AGM position. The change would be included in the 1999-2000 budget, though probably not implemented at that time. While the divisions would remain essentially the same in numbers, the reporting structure would change. The goal is to streamline and Flatten the executive management structure. After much discussion, the Steering Committee agreed to adjourn the discussion to 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, February 24, prior to the regular Steering Committee meeting. Staff was directed to provide 4-5 options for consideration by the Committee. ~ Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 20, 1999 Staffina Plan: Impact of CIP on Engineering and other Departments. David Ludwin explained the need for additional staffing in the Engineering Department because of the increase in Capital Improvement Projects scheduled for the next 4-5 years. Some of the requested positions will be contract employees rather than full-lime District employees. This will allow hiring staff that have specific skill sets for the duration those skills are required. Staff will prepare a narrative explanation as well as the charts and present them to the PDC Committee. Necessary job skills will be identified to complete the CIP, as well as identifying skills of existing employees. Revisit Taroet Numbers. Staff has determined that to go below 500 would require automation of the plants and at this time that is at least three years away. Job J-42, currently underway, will identify what operations are cost effective to automate. Willingness to Increase Operational Risk to Achieve Staffina Reductions. Risks associated with automation must also be considered and managed. A model will be presented to the Directors when this project is complete. Because this information is not available at this time, staff is recommending that the current staffing projections remain in place. Willingness to Utilize Layoffs to Achieve Staffina Reductions. This issue was not discussed ANNOUNCEMENTS Blake Anderson announced that there will be a workshop on March 13 to discuss ocean issues re the Groundwater Replenishment System EIR so that the Directors will have background information before considering the adoption of the final EIR at the March 24 Joint Boards meeting. On Saturday, April 10, another workshop will be held at the request of the FAHR Committee to review the connection fee rate schedule. All directors will be encouraged to attend this workshop. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 12:15 p.m. Submitted by: / lt_ 0--1c J Tappan ering Committee Secretary w 1p GNNpe, &WEER CQ MIREflYVfeD0V0]NYO SCEMIRelwl Minulel Gx ' be s b DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, March 3, 1999 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 3, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair James Ferryman, Vice Chair Staff Present: Peer Swan, Vice Chair Jan Debay, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Don Bankhead Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services John Collins, Past Board Chair Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin. Anna Piercy Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance Peter Green Dave Ludwin, Director Engineering Joy Neugebauer Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology Charles E. Sylvia Michelle Tuchman, Director Communications Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary Mike Moore, ECM Manager Directors Absent: Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Jeff Armstrong, Principal Environmental Specialists Jon Thomsic, Sr. Engineer Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialists Jim Wybenga, Principal Environmental Specialists Jerry Jones, Maintenance Manager Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manger Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manage Barbara Collins, Sr. Financial Analyst APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. OCSD 0 P.o.Box 0127 0 Foundin vanes,CA 9272"127 0 (714)962-2411 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee r Page 2 March 3, 1999 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the December 2, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (Pat McGuigan) Chair McGuigan introduced both Joy Neugebauer and Peter Green as new members to the Committee. Chair McGuigan also announced that, if there were no objections, beginning with the April 7, 1999 Committee meeting, the Committee's start time would change to start at 5:00 p.m. instead of 5:30 p.m. There was no objection. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre) The General Manager reported that he had just returned from a wastewater industry meeting in San Antonio, TX and was impressed with the major increasing competitiveness that has taken place partly due to operating efficiently and the fear of privatization. This is a major contrast to where it was just three years ago. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson) The Assistant General Manager was not in attendance. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) Informed the Committee that an advertising agency would be doing a Saturn photo-shoot at the Plant 2 facility on March 4, 1999. He also showed a 10 minute video entitled "Grease is the Word", obtained from the City of Oxnard's Wastewater Treatment Facility. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles) Update on item OMTS98-030 Year 2000 Date Change Compliance Project: Project is coming along well. There are four major areas that still require further work. Software testing has been identified and Information technology or) is working with Engineering and O&M to review the approach being used to assess embedded devices. In April IT will be coming forward a contingency plan proposal. Cost to-date is approximately$1M, which breaks down to 1/3 in overhead, 1/3 staff time and 1/3 in contract billing. The GM, Communications, Finance, GSA and IT departments are either complete or near completion. Objective One of the Project will be met in April/May 1999 timeframe. Can Gen control systems at Plants 1 and 2 are in the process of having the control systems updated. CMMS is not Y21K compliant and IT is replacing it with Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 March 3, 1999 PEMS. This system should be in place by the end of the year. Source Control inspectors continue to discuss Y2K with their permittees as they complete their inspections and are in the process of scheduling a Multi-agency Outreach Y21K Forum on April 8, 1999. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) Due to the lack of rain this year, the flow received at the treatment plant is below budget, which will reduce operation costs if rain stays at the present low levels. This is in contract with very high monthly average flows for this time last due to El Nino. Attached to this month's Monthly O&M Report is the Quarterly DART Update. Directors are concerned about the number and type of accidents reported this month and if the employees are using the appropriate safety devices in their daily activities and request that our Safety Prevention procedures be reviewed with the employees. Staff reported that due to the Y2K project, preventative maintenance has been impacted. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelll) The Regional Water Quality Board will be meeting Friday, March 5, 1999 to discuss the spill in Newport Beach on July 21, 1998 where thousands of gallons of raw sewage spilled. Staff will be seeking guidance from the Board on how to proceed. There are multiple agencies that share responsibility for that spill including OCSD. There is the possibility that a penalty will be assessed in the amount of$15 to $25 thousand dollars. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEMS) The order of Discussion Item(s) was changed to place Item OMTS99-06 first. 1. OMTS99-06 PLANT REINVENTION AND AUTOMATION PROJECT STATUS REPORT, JOB NO. J-42 Motion: Information only 2. OMTS99-01 COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM UPDATE Motion: Information only Minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 March 3, 1999 3. OMTS99-02 ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE UPDATE Motion: Information only 4. OMTS99-03 IN-SOURCING OF DISTRICTS OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM Motion: Information only 5. OMTS99-04 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT Motion: Information only 6. OMTS99-05 MULTI-AGENCY BENCHMARKING STUDY Motion: Information only 6. OMTS99-06 PLANT REINVENTION AND AUTOMATION PROJECT STATUS REPORT, JOB NO. J-42 Motion: Information only OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. 1 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance k, and Technical Services Committee Page 5 March 3, 1999 CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for April 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Submitted by: r , ankie Woodside Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary M:4vp.dtata9enda%OMTS\7999WIinutesU3-99 Wnutes.doe DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, March 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present. David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norm Eckenrode, Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Steve Anderson Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager John Collins, Past Chair Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor Lynn Daucher Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer Jack Mauller Penny Kyle, Board Secretary Russell Patterson Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Christina Shea Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Board Chair None (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. OCSD • P 0.Box 8127 • Fountain Vail".CA 92728A127 . (714) 962-2411 a e Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting ` Page 2 March 4, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 4, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering advised that an orientation for new Directors to the PDC Committee would be held on April 1, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. prior to the regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Ludwin then requested the committee's input on future requests for budget increases for staff costs. The committee directed staff to continue bringing these requests to the committee and full board for approval. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item, The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item a) a. POC99-07. Receive and file verbal report on Plant Reinvention and Automation Project, Job No. J-42. (Information Only Item) Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer, reported on Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention and Automation Project. r Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 March 4, 1999 (12) ACTION ITEMS (Hems No. b-h) b. PDC99-08: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$60,150, increasing the total contract amount to $35,689,903; and (2) Accept Job No. Pt-36-2 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. c. PDC99-09: Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-40-3, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Pave West. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. d. PDC99-10: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc, authorizing an addition of$25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $989,809; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with AirPol Construction, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. e. PDC99-11: Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional funds for Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total project budget of$1,811,000, Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. f. PDC99-12: Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. g. PDC99.13: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, with Veme's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an addition of$250, increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and (2)Accept Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5.33-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Veme's Plumbing, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Director Jack Mauller abstained. 9 Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting ` Page 4 March 4, 1999 h. PDC99-14: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$262,274, and 203 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,656,974; and (2) Approve a budget amendment of $351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a total project budget of $4,232,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Director Russell Patterson abstained. (14) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session_ (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. (18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 1, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. Beginning with the May 6, 1999 meeting, the starting time will change to 5:00 p.m. (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair dedared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: ail Cain PDC Committee Secretary H:Wp.E WgW0CNDCNIMARVA.W..d PDC COMMITTEE Meeaog Date ro .0 r wr. 3/4/99 3/24/99 AGENDA REPORT IemNumOer ItemN q -08 Orange County Sanitation Dlst ' FROM: David Ludwin, irector of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$60,150, increasing the total contract amount to $35,689,903; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-36-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 17 includes fifteen items of added and deleted work to Job No. P1-36-2. There is one error item associated with this change order. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date Oct. 18, 1995 Original Contract Completion Date Mar. 5, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 17 Current Contract Completion Date Nov. 16, 1998 Actual Completion Date Nov. 16, 1998 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes 338,753.00 This Change (Add) 60,150.00 Change Orders to Date 398,903.00 Percentage Increase 1.13% Amended Contract Price $35,689,903.00 Value Engineering Credits $ 334,841.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: A.3.b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the return activated sludge (RAS) pumps, replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air Flotation thickeners (DAF), addition of three new dissolved air flotation thickeners (DAF) and other improvements. These improvements will increase the secondary treatment capacity from 46 million gallons per day to 80 million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate on June 28, 1995. This contract is now complete. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Provide Screw Type Compressors $ ( 5,647) 0 Design Change —VE#9 2 Delete Seismic Braces for Pipe ( 3,000) 0 Design Change Support Racks 3 Add Electrical Pullbox at Secondary 432 0 Changed Clarifiers Condition 4 Add Light Fixtures in Tunnel 6,646 0 Design Change 5 Replace Blower Discharge Valve 25,713 0 Design Change Seats 6 Purchase of Excavated Material 5 000 0 Other 7 Wash Down Aeration Diffusers 15,446 0 Other 8 Revise Fixture Mounting Details 404 0 Error 9 Relocate Electrical Feed for 2,075 0 Design Change Polymer Mixer 10 Modify Piping in Polymer Area 467 0 Design Change 11 1 Remove Temporary Bypass Piping 3.454 0 Design Change 12 Piping Modifications in DAF 4,932 0 Desi n Change 13 Reimbursement for Truck Loading ( 2,317) 0 Other Facility Repair 14 Add Floor Drain Polymer Area 5,783 0 Design Change 15 Modify HVAC Duct in DAF 762 0 Design Change TOTAL - Change Order No. 17 1 $ 60,150 0 1WobaftWalal WtglobaMgenda pall Rap*ft%PDCW1362AIR-0017-MAR.dw Page 2 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no rework or consultant reimbursement associated with Item B. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Change Order Status Report Change Order PRIC \WobaftWatal NtglobalWgenda Draft RepaftXPDC1P1362AIR-0017-MAR.da Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Secondary Treatment Imp. At Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%) Project Development S Design Staff E Consuaant PSA is 1,406,055 6 1,469,058 S 1,469,058 $ 1,469,ma E 1.469.058 S 1.302,300 89% Construction Contract S 35.835.690 B 36,035,690 $ 36.035.690 $ 35.829.753 S WJ50 S 35,689,903 $ 35,629,753 100% Construction(Other) E Construction Stall 9 3,358,245 S 3,295,252 $ 3,295.252 $ 3,295.252 $ 3.295,252 E 2,320.032 70% Contingency $TOTAL E 40.600,000 $ 40,800,000 S $ 40,8OO,ODO S 40,394,063 B 60.150 $ 40,454,213 E 39,252,085 97% n7%we.dlAan9ljaE..dR I.36-2laoneodaal9l.A. 1—R.—d 1/19199 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P7-36-2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6128/95 $ 35,291000.00 $ 35,291,000.00 0.00 900 900 CO NO. 1 11/22/95 $ (297.500.00) $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 "CO NO. 2 6/6196 $ - $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 3 8128/96 $ (100,226.00) $ 34,893,274.00 (1.13) 0 900 CO NO. 4 9125/96 $ 24,733.00 $ 34,918,007.00 (1.06) 0 900 "CO NO. 5 10/3196 $ 29,251.00 $ 34,947,258.00 (0.97) 0 900 CO NO. 6 3126/97 $ 179,966.00 $ 35,127,224.00 (0.46) 0 900 CO NO. 7 4/23/97 $ 130,573.00 $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 28 928 'CO NO. 8 4/24197 $ - $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 98 1026 "CO NO. 9 8/7/97 $ (2,479.00) $ 35,255,318.00 (0.10) 0 1026 *CO NO. 10 10/16/97 $ 6,966.00 $ 35,262,284.00 (0.08) 0 1026 CO NO. 11 12/17/97 $ 69,628.00 $ 35,331,912.00 0.12 0 1026 *CO NO. 12 4/8198 $ 22,651.00 $ 35,354,563.00 0.18 0 1026 *CO NO. 13 6124/98 $ (8,272.00) $ 35,346,291.00 0.16 17 1043 "CO NO. 14 9/3198 $ 30.154.00 $ 35,376,445.00 0.24 15 1058 CO NO. 15 10/28/98 $ 122,912.00 $ 35,499,357.00 0.59 38 1096 CO NO. 16 12/16/98 $ 130,396.00 $ 35,629,753.00 0.96 60 1158 CO NO. 17 Pending $ 60,150.00 1 $ 35,689,903.00 1.13 0 1156 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 —Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 P1362CO Stet Rpt Page 1 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"Il27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Dale: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduet) $60,150.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — PROVIDE SCREW TYPE COMPRESSORS AT DAF FACILITY— VALUE ENGINEERING PROPOSAL NO, 9 This credit item provides for air-cooled screw-type compressors in lieu of the specified water- cooled reciprocating compressors at the DAF facility. This item includes miscellaneous revisions to piping, wiring, and control to accommodate the new compressors. The decision to acquire the new compressors was due to many factors: compressor cost, longevity, reduced water use, reduced maintenance, and elimination of corrosion that would occur by using a water-cooled compressor. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-35, VE P1362.09) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (5,647.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— DELETE SEISMIC BRACES FOR PIPE SUPPORT RACKS This credit item is for deleting 50 seismic braces for pipe rack supports on this project. These braces are being deleted from this project and improved braces for the piping will be installed as part of the seismic retrofit project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-58) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (3,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 3—ADD ELECTRICAL PULLBOX AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS This item is for providing labor and material to add a concrete electrical pullbox near the Secondary Clarifiers adjacent to Power Building 6. The existing pullbox was destroyed during the demolition work for the new Secondary Clarifiers. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-86) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 432.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—ADD LIGHT FIXTURES IN EXISTING CLARIFIER TUNNEL This item is for providing labor and material to install 11 new light fixtures in the existing Secondary Clarifier Tunnel. The new fixtures are necessary to provide adequate lighting for District personnel to perform maintenance work on the new equipment installed in this tunnel. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-102) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,646.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5— REPLACE BLOWER DISCHARGE VALVE SEATS This item is for labor and material to replace valve seats for the blower discharge valves at Blowers 1, 2, 4, and 5. The existing valve seats are 20 years old and are no longer functioning adequately. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-107) ADDED COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 25,713.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 6—PURCHASE OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL This item is for retaining approximately 5,000 cubic yards of select surplus excavated material that originally was specified for removal from the site. This material is needed for use as structural fill material for the future warehouse project at Plant No. 2. The costs associated with this item result from the Contractor's revenue loss resulting from this change. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference: FCO P1362-123) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—WASH DOWN AERATION DIFFUSERS AND PUMP OUT CLARIFIERS This item provides labor and equipment to wash down the aeration diffusers and pump out the Secondary Clarifiers in order to support the construction sequence. This wash down work was not shown in the original contract documents and District staff was unable to perform this work in the necessary fime frame. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-130) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,446 00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—REVISE FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL AT RAS PUMP STATION This item revises the light fixture mounting detail in order to hang the fixtures from the ceiling. This revision was necessary due to a conflict in the contract documents that indicated a wall- mount type facture. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-132) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 404.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 9— RELOCATE ELECTRICAL FEED FOR POLYMER MIXER This item provides labor and material to relocate the electrical feed for Polymer Mix Tank No. 2 from MCC W'to the new MCC "MB". The existing MCC"M" is scheduled to be removed under a future project. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-139) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2.075.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—MODIFY PIPING IN POLYMER AREA This item is for miscellaneous modifications to the drain and bubbler piping in the polymer area. This work is necessary to eliminate inaccurate readings of the bubbler system caused from the turbulence. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-122) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 467.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 — REMOVE TEMPORARY BYPASS PIPING This item provides labor and equipment to remove the temporary WAS bypass piping that was installed earlier on this project. This work was done per the request of the District's Operations Department. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-143) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,454.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 12 —PIPING MODIFICATIONS IN DAF FACILITY, RAS AND WAS AREAS This item provides piping modifications in the DAF facility, RAS and WAS areas to gain accessibility to miscellaneous equipment. This work was generated by a recommendation from District staff during the beneficial occupancy walkthrough. This item was accomplished by Contradofs tome account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-144) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,932 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13—REIMBURSEMENT FOR DAMAGE REPAIR AT TRUCK LOADING This credit item is for reimbursement of the District's labor, equipment, and materials costs for dean up, testing, and inspecting the repair of the truck loading facility. A subcontractor of Margate Construction drove through the truck loading station and damaged the District's sludge loading equipment. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-145) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,317.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14—ADD FLOOR DRAIN AT POLYMER AREA This item is for labor and material to install a floor drain at the polymer mixing area. The existing polymer area has poor drainage. The new drain will eliminate the ponding problems and improve safety for District personnel working in this area. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-146) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,783.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 15—MODIFY HVAC DUCT IN DAF AREA This item is for labor to modify a duct in the DAF area to eliminate turbulence that was causing excessive vibration in an exhaust fan. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 762.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 60,150.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days i Page 7 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995 Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 256 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1,156 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 16, 1998 Projected Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 35,291,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 338,753.00 This Change Order(Add) $ 60,150.00 Amended Contract Price $ 35,689,903.00 r ( Page 8 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 Board Acceptance Date: March 24, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Su itled by. ' fl• 3-3 C - nstruction Ma ager Date :Direcktor 3-51Engineering Date Accepted by MARGATE CONSTRUCTION 1 ?i-1-Oq Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Mee nq Da a To Btl.of D r. 3/9/99 3/29/93 AGENDA REPORT I em Number I e ym PD R9- Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Lu rector of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-40-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-3, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Pave West. SUMMARY Job No. P1-40-3, Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, provides for improvements to drainage and asphalt in seven different locations at Plant No. 1. The project includes removal and replacement of asphalt and the addition of drains in the plant. Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Pave West on June 24, 1998. This project is now complete. Contract Start Date Sept. 15, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999 Actual Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 171,717.00 Total Contract Change Orders $ 4,962.00 Percentage Increase 2.89% Final Adjusted Amount $ 176,679.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: A.S.d) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Cost for the Construction Staff Task on the Budget Information Table has exceeded the approved budget for this task. Surplus budget funds are being transferred from the Construction Contract and Contingency Tasks to provide for the overrun. The total project budget will not increase. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report PP:Ic WntglobaMgenda Draft ReportsTMP 7-00.3AR-Close0ul-MAR.doc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-40-3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ S Design Staff $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ Construction Contract $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ 7000 $ 183'000 $ 171.717 $ 4,962 $ 176.679 $ 172,545 98% Construction Other $ $ Construction Star/ $ 19,000 $ 19,000 $ 18,000 $ 37,000 $ 19.000 It 18,000 $ 37,000 $ 36.224 98% Contingency $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ $ TOTAL $ 220.000 1 $ 220. 00 S - $ 220,000 $ 190,717 $ 22,962 1 $ 213,679 $ 208.769 1 98% h'."dk,e`enp1._1001 Budget Table Form Revised!1211798 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-40-3 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE . (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 9/15198 $ 171,717 $ 171.717 0.00 150 150 CO NO 1' 2111/99 $ 4,962 $ 176,679 2.89 0 150 *Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 H:\wp.dwengllobs contrect\p1403TM3.xls=Stet apt S PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 3/2 ad.4/99 of Dlr. 3/4/99 AGENDA REPORT QtDCNumb'O t lwe Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION, JOB NO. P1-51 (REBID) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $989,809; and (2) Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with AirPoi Construction, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 4 includes four items of added work to Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) and one item for liquidated damages. There are no errors or omissions associated with this change order. There is a 14 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The Contractor was assessed two days of liquidated damages for late delivery of the compressor, which was beyond the milestone dated specified in Change Order No. 3. This change order is within the delegated authority granted by Board Resolution 98-8 for General Manager approval, however, the change order was prepared in conjunction with the Closeout Agreement. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date Mar. 12, 1996 Original Contract Completion Date July 29, 1997 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date Oct. 30, 1998 Actual Completion Date Oct. 30, 1998 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 2 Liquidated Damage Assessment $1,000. %cI,alMala l N,gloLaM9anda Daft rbftfts D6UR P151R W1W21N Rc Page i PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 663,856.00 Previously Authorized Changes 299,978.00 This Change (Add) 25,975.00 Change Orders to Date 325,953.00 Percentage Increase to Date 49.10% Amended Contract Price $ 989,809.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Ptant 1 5G) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Costs for Design and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table exceeded the approved budget for these tasks. Surplus budget funds are being transferred from the Consultant PSA and Construction Contract Tasks to provide funds for these overruns. The total budget will not increase. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project provides for construction of a compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling station at Reclamation Plant No. 1 to service biosolids hauling trucks. A public service station is also being constructed as part of this contract to serve local government agencies and the public. The Gas Company prepared the plans and specifications at no cost and the contract was awarded to AirPol Construction, Inc. on Dec. 18, 1996. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Electrical and Telephone Service $ 5,670 4 Changed Addition at Public Dispenser Condition 2 Compressor Skid Electrical 7,862 4 Design Change Modifications 3 Compressor and Dryer Skid 8,868 4 Design Change Mechanical Modifications and Startup 4 Telephone and Communication 4,575 2 Design Change Cable Addition 5 Liquidated damages (1,000) 0 Other TOTAL—Change Order No. 4 $ 25,975 14 w.mru,e,wmrwuMm a.nxm,nwmnavu,amam:�eaas Page 2 f f, All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption filed in August, 1996. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order JBF:Ic mse. IVVPee gwdaa RepenIPOLURP%S1P.COa.61ttYB hr Page BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION JOB NO. P1-51(REBID) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%I' "t J Project Developmenl $ (139,500) $ (139,500) $ (139,500) �� $ (139.500) $ (139,500) $ (139,500) 100% Design Staff $ $ - $ - $ 0% Consultant PSA $ 94,500 $ 114,500 $ 114.500 $ 114,500 $ 114,500 $ 100,000 87% Construction Contract $ 426,074 $ 963.834 $ 25,975 $ 989,809 $ 963,834 $ 25,975 $ 989,809 $ 901,614 91% Construction(Other) $ 454,300 $ 389,566 $ (25,975) $ 363,591 $ 389,666 $ 25,975 $ 363,591 $ 353,802 97% Construction Staff $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 234.048 138% Conlin ency $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0% TOTAL $ 835,374 $ 1,503.400 $ - $ 1,503,400 $ 1,503,400 $ - $ 1,503.400 $ 1.449,964 1 98% h:k".MebngUOBSCONTRACTWI-S1R%Change OMerslBwgsl.t.b C04.X13 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION JOB NO. P7-51 (REBID) APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 3112197 $ 633,856.00 $ 633,856.00 140 140 CO NO 1' 1/5/98 $ 12,388.00 $ 646,244.00 1.95 0 140 CO NO 2- 3/12198 $ - $ 646,244.00 1.95 0 140 CO NO 3 3125/98 $ 287,590.00 $ 933,834.00 47.33 444 584 CO NO Pending $ 25.975.00 $ 989,809.00 49.10% 1 14 598 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 Change.Order. Status.CO4.xls Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Peduet) $ 25,975.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADDITION OF ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE SERVICE CONDUITS AND PULL BOXES AT THE PUBLIC DISPENSER The Contractor was directed to reroute electrical power and telephone service to the new natural gas public dispenser station near the main entrance of Plant 1. The contract drawings required the contractor to utilize existing conduits and pull boxes serving the waste hauler control building. The conduits and boxes were not available for use. Additional work including trenching, removal of an undisclosed concrete obstruction, installation of new 1-inch electrical and telephone conduits and fittings, placement of red concrete ductbank encasement, installation of new electrical and telephone pullboxes, and core drilling the masonry block wall of the wastehauler station. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,670.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 2—COMPRESSOR SKID ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to research and prepare new termination drawings for the gas compressor skid and dispensers. Also included in this item is the addition of two new NEMA 3R junction boxes, which were required to make the final electrical connections to the compressor skid. The contract drawings originally prepared by the Gas Company were based on a gas compressor skid purchased by the District from PennWilson. Due to default by Penn Wilson, it was necessary for the District to purchase a new gas compressor skid from IMW Atlas. The electrical configuration for the IMW Atlas compressor skid required modification of the contract drawings to make the system operate. The contract drawings did not show the added junction boxes, which were required to make the final electrical connections to the IMW Atlas compressor ` skid. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,862.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ltrdw%debl Wv dl ngUOBS 8 CONTRACTSW151 R`c ngeoNem=4do I Page 2 of 4 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) ITEM 3—COMPRESSOR SKID AND DRYER MECHANICAL MODIFICATIONS AND STARTUP The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a control line from the natural gas dryer humidifier sensor to the gas compressor skid blowdown tanks. Also included is the cost of labor for startup of the gas dryer skid, which was purchased by the District. The work included trenching, installation of the `'/,inch stainless steel tubing and controls from the dryer skid to the gas compressor skid, connections, backfll and paving. The contract drawings did not show the control line interconnection between the dryer and the gas compressor. Startup of the natural gas dryer skid was not included in the contract. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,868.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 4—TELEPHONE AND COMMUNICATION CABLE ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install emergency telephones and communication cable to connect the gas compressor skid and dispensers to the District communication system. Cable was installed from the basement of the blower building to the gas compressor skid and the transit dispenser card reader. One telephone was installed adjacent to the gas compressor skid. Another telephone was installed at the public dispenser near the front entrance at Plant 1 and communication cable was run from the dispenser to the waste hauler control building. The emergency telephones and cabling were not included in the contract. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,575.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days ITEM 5—LIQUIDATED DAMAGES A milestone date of September 11, 1998 was established for delivery of the gas compressor package unit to the District at Plant No. 1. The compressor skid was delivered two days beyond the milestone date. The Contractor is therefore assessed 2 days of liquidated damages at $500.00 per day for a total of$1,000.00. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(1,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 25,975.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days ftdm'Aztat Wv AaY. UOBS 8 CONTRACTST151RWongeordersl 4Aw Page 3 of 4 Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 14 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 12, 1997 Original Contract Time: 140 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 29, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 14 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 458 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 598 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 30, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 2 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: October 30, 1998 Original Contract Price $ 663,856.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 299,978.00 This Change(Add)(8edust) $ 25,975.00 Amended Contract Price S 989.8 99.00 \ bdon`datal".Al nvoBs 8 CONTRACMP151 Mc Ma g.rd.\C04.d. Page 4 of 4 V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELUS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. AlrPOI Construction Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refuellno Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Sub ihed by: 3-,- � CA sWelion Menaper d bY• Dis tlmr Fltpbr **V Date Accepted by AIRPOL C#RUCTION, INC. Co act 17 r 'Date H:WP.Men9U0HS a CONTRACTSIPI-31 R"rG=*mIC0-4.dw PDC COMMITTEE Meebng Date To Bd.of Dir. 3 499 3-2199 AGENDA REPORT IemN.mbr Imm DC44-U Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David LudwJector of Engineering Originator: George Thuro, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE, JOB NO. J-31-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional funds for Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total project budget of $1,811,000. SUMMARY The Board adopted the current budget on July 1, 1998 as part of the Budget for Fiscal Year 1998-1999. The original contract completion date was October 11, 1998. This job incorporates a liquidated damages clause of$ 1000 per day. The current estimated completion of this project is May 1, 1999, which is eight months after the original contract date. Change Orders are projected to be under 5 percent of the original contract amount. The contract delays are due to change orders, contractor performance, and computer programming delays. District staff is providing the programming. However, this programming is being delayed as the Y2K and other construction projects are taking priority. The additional funds requested are for additional staff labor cost, overhead costs, and other direct cost. A net budget increase of$ 265,000 is requested to bring the total project budget to $ 1,811,000. Contract Start Date December 16, 1997 Original Contract Completion Date October 11, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date February 15, 1999 Projected Completion Date May 1, 1999 Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.(Line nem:la) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Costs for the Construction Staff Task on the Budget Information Table exceeded the approved budget for that task. Funds for this cost overrun are being provided by utilizing the current project contingency fund and by requesting approval for additional funds. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff predicts the project completion will be delayed until May of this year. Change Order No. 1 extends the contract date from October 11, 1998 to February 15, 1999. The change order grants the Contractor the time extension on a concurrent delay basis, where both the Contractor and the District have delayed completion of the job. The District delays were primarily due to time taken to respond to Contractor requests for information regarding existing equipment circuitry, to produce the subsequent plan changes, and to implement the changed work. There are not any Contractor extended overhead costs associated with this time extension nor liquidated damages assessed by the Districts. Subsequent to the time extension associated with Change Order No. 1, the District has encountered delays in completing computer programming required to start up and test the equipment provided on the contract. Programming staff efforts have been diverted to the Y2K project and other construction projects. Another time extension will be negotiated with the Contractor to delay start up testing until after the program can be developed. Primarily, the additional budget being requested is for staff labor cost and overhead for additional construction management, shop drawing review, change order development, and record drawing production. The costs for these tasks were underestimated in the current budget. Additional costs are also being incurred by the extended contract time. Staff projects an additional $ 363,000 for construction management will be required to complete the project. ALTERNATIVES None CEDA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS W Budget Information Table Change Order Status Table GT:Ic WntgbbaMpenda DnR Repoftl MWIl PDC Age Repel MARCH 1999.Cx BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE JOB NO. J-31-3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT[TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%( Project Development Design Staff $ 43.320 $ 43,320 $ 43.320 $ 43,320 $ 43,320 $ 43,320 100% Consultant PSA Is 343,130 $ 343.130 $ 343,130 $ 343.130 $ 343,130 1 $ 343,130 100% V tract $ 694.000 $ 694.000 $ 694,000 $ 693,646 $ 693.646 $ 557,897 80% her ff $ 367,550 S 367.550 $ 363,000 $ 730,550 $ 367.550 $ 363,000 $ 730,550 $ 495.985 68% $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $$ 1,546,000 $ 1,546,000 $ 265,000 $ 1.811.000 S 1447.646 $ 363,000 $ 1810,646 $ 1,440.332 80% J31.3 Bu42et TeEla.Mama B ud Bu4pet Rw,Revised 294/99 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE JOB NO. J-31-3 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 12/16/97 $ 694,000.00 $ 694,000.00 300 300 CO NO. 1• Pending $ (354.00) $ 693,646.00 (0.02) 127 427 Pending approval by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 J-31-3,COSTAT COI PDC COMMITTEE MeetlngDate 3/4/99 TO BA. 3/34/9 ofgDir. Number AGENDA REPORT IOemNumtem m DCN umber I J Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Lud irector of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS JOB NO. SP19980015 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc. SUMMARY Job No. SP19980015, Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, provided four areas of improvements to miscellaneous lighting at Plant No. 1 and 2. This project included removal and replacement of light fixtures and added lighting. TMAD Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Power Distributors, Inc. on May 27, 1998. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date July 14, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 0 Current Contract Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998 Actual Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 67,500.00 Total Contract Change Orders $ 0.00 Percentage Increase 0% Final Adjusted Amount $ 67,500.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities, 6h) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Costs for the Design and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table exceeded the approved budget for these tasks. Surplus budget funds are being transferred from the Consultant PSA and Construction Contract Tasks to provide funds for these overruns. The total project budget will not increase. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table PP:Ic PcobaftAala I Wgloba Mgenda Draft ReponsNDClSP98OD15AR-CloseOut-MAR.dm Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications JOB NO. 19980015 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - $ Design Stag $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 3,667 $ 5.667 $ 2,000 $ 3,667 $ 5,667 $ 5,667 100% Consultant PSA $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ (2.800)1 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17.200 100% Construction Contract $ 95.000 $ 95.000 $ (27.500) $ 67,500 $ 87,500 $ 67.500 $ 60,750 90% Construction(Other) $ $ Construction Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 26,633 $ 31,633 $ 5,000 $ 28.633 $ 31,633 $ 28,848 91% Contingency $ $ TOTAL is 122,000 $ 122.000 $ - $ 122,000 is 91.700 1 $ 30.300 $ 122,000 $ 112.465 92% h%.p.dtM@ng1..MAget table Form Revised 1L17MB PDC COMMITTEE M eang Me Tct:tD.. 3/4/99 3/24/99 r AGENDA REPORT Item NumW ItemN Orange County Sanitation District PD099-1$ rL FROM: David Ludwl , hector of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, with Verne's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an addition of$250 increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and (2) Accept Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Verne's Plumbing, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work to Contract No_ 5-33-1. The item is an omission. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per calendar day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed. Contract Start Date July 20, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998 Actual Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 36.700 This Change(Add) $ 250 Percentage Increase 0,68 % Final Contract Price $ 36,950 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 5, Item b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable(information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, provides for a new concrete driveway, access gates, and doors. The plans and specifications were prepared by District staff. The construction contract was awarded to Veme's Plumbing, Inc. on May 27, 1998. The contract is now complete. The following table summarizes the Change Order: ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Wall Drains 250 0 Omission TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 $ 250 0 This item would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. There is no rework involved. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order TH:lc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 9,000 $ 9000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9.000 $ 6.846 75% Consultant PSA I I $ $ Construction Contract $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37.000 $ 36.700 $ 260 $ 36,950 $ 35.783 97% Construction Other $ $ Construction Staff $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,781 103% Contin enc $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $ TOTAL $ 80,000 $ 80.000 $ - $ 80,000 1 1 $ 73.700 1 $ 250 1 $ 73,950 $ 71,410 1 97% hA\ ,.dWn n9Vormsfbutl9et table Form RavieaL 12117198 e. CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 7/20/98 $ 36,700.00 $ 36,700.00 90 90 CO NO. 1 Pending $ 250.00 $ 36,950.00 0.68% 0 90 H:Wp.dtabnglENGlS33.11C01chngstal xls a a Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station Contract No. 5-33-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) $ 250.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - PROVIDE OUTLET DRAIN IN PERIMETER WALL The Contractor was directed to core drill at the bottom of the westerly block wall fence to allow for drainage of rainwater, etc., out of the building grounds. The drainage had been omitted from the contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 250,00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 250.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (t) Date: March 24, 1999 Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33.1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extension to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is there fore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 20, 1998 Original Contract Time: 90 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 15, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension:. 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 90 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 15, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Dale: October 15, 1998 Original Contract Price $ 36,700.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change(Add) (9edusl) $ 250.00 Amended Contract Price $ 36,950.00 i Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge PUMP Station, Contract No. 5.33-1 Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Reviewed by: Co slructton Manager Dale 0' AID rov y: t 3 3 99 Director of Engineering Date _Accept by: Conlr ctor Date t ti P g. j r2�l.i S i D'EJ PDC COMMITTEE Me ng Da TO Bd.Of Dir. 3- 99 3-zags T AGENDA REPORT Pce"vat t fWmNj ") n Orange County Sanitation Di 'dt FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No.1, to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$262,274, and 203 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,656,974; and (2) Approve a budget amendment of$351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a total project budget of$4,232,000. SUMMARY Change Order No. 1 includes 30 items of added work to Contract No. 7-7-1. There are 7 omission items associated with this change order. There is a 203 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The Board adopted the current budget on July 1, 1998 as part of the Budget for Fiscal Year 1998-1999. This budget was estimated with a 5 percent allowance for change order contingency and a projected contract completion date in September 1998. The contract is currently projected to be completed in March 1999. Change orders are currently projected to be approximately 17 percent of the original contract amount. The funds requested are for additional labor, overhead, and change order contingency to complete the project. A net budget increase of$351,000 is requested to bring the total project budget to $4,232,000. Contract Start Date June 2, 1997 Original Contract Completion Date June 27, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders To Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date January 16, 1999 Projected Completion Date March 31, 1999 Projected Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Projected Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY f Original Contract Price $ 2,394,700.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change(Add) $ 262,274.00 Change Orders to Date $ 262,274.00 Percentage Increase to Date 10.95 % Amended Contract Price $ 2,656,974.00 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) Y ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line Item:Zone 7, Item b;Zone 14. Item a) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Cost for the Construction Contract and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table have overrun the current budget. Funds for these cost overruns are being provided by utilizing the current project contingency fund and by requesting approval for additional budget funds. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project adds a permanent generator building and outfits the second half of the Main Street Pump Station with five new pumps and motors and two variable frequency drives (VFDs). The existing side of the station will receive two new VFDs. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The construction contract was awarded to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. on April 23, 1997. The Contract is 90 percent complete. The following table summarizes Change Order No. 1. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Changes to Elecbrical and $96,432 161 Design Change Instrumentation 2 Fuel Containment Piping 23 694 17 Other 3 Addition of Missing Conduits 21,332 14 Design Change 4 Electrical Changes to Fans 16,616 11 Design Change 5 Conduit Material Change 7,099 0 Design Change 6 Reroute Waterline 1,646 0 Design Change 7 Emergency Light Fixture Change 1,343 0 Design Change 8 Duct and Joist Interference 1,595 0 Omission 9 Hoses for Pump Packing Drains 571 0 Design Change 10 Address Sin 475 0 Design Change 11 Overtime for Wet Well Work 236 0 Design Change 12 Silencer Support Modifications 7,774 0 Omission 13 Fire Hydrant Installation 21 127 0 Changed Condition 14 Reroute Conduit in Motor Room 9,398 0 Changed Condition 15 Light Fixture Relocation 3,794 0 Omission 16 1 Motor Control Revisions 5,709 0 Omission 17 Separation of Voltages in Conduits 10134 0 1 Design Change 18 Wiring Change for Motor RTDs 2.704 0 Omission 19 Controls for Fuel Pump 5,407 0 Omission ' 20 Generator Day tank Vent 1,809 0 Omission 21 Pump Shaft Alignment 392 0 Changed Condition 22 Replace Existing Valve 458 0 Design Change 23 Valve Repair 2,771 0 Design Change 24 Bleeder Piping Repair 1,844 0 Design Change Page 2 25 Motor Base Seal Modifications 2,545 0 Design Change 26 Exhaust Piping Insulation 952 0 Design Change 27 Pipe Modification at Existing Vault 7,582 0 Changed Condition 28 Miscellaneous HVAC Changes 2,191 0 Design Change 29 Underground Tank Leak Alarm 575 0 Design Change Training 30 Catwalk Bracing 4.069 0 Design Change TOTAL-Change Order No. 1 $262,274 203 Item 1 includes 126 calendar days of concurrent delays, where both the Contractor and the District have delayed the project. Item 1 also includes an additional 35 calendar days with Contractor extended overhead cost. Items 2, 3, and 4 also include extended overhead cost for an additional 42 calendar days. Items 8, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20 are omissions. An additional time extension will be requested in a future change order for items not included in this change order. As of January, staff has negotiated an additional 73 calendar day time extension for change order items to be submitted in the future. This time includes additional extended overhead cost and will revise the contract date to March 31, 1999. The final costs of the ongoing change order work have not been negotiated. Additional budget for the construction contract will be requested with the change order. Regarding this budget increase, the additional funds requested for this project provide for additional staff time required to complete the extended project, the associated staff overhead allocations, and change order costs. ALTERNATIVE None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final IER was approved on July 19, 1998 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 30, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order TH:Ic Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 83,000 S 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 S 83,000 100% Consultant PSA Is 212.000 $ 360.351 1 $ 360.351 1 $ 350.351 1 $ 360.351 1 $ 340.711 95% k ction Contract $ 690,000 $ 2,394,700 $ 262,274 $ 2,656,974 $ 2.394,700 $ 262,274 $ 2,656,974 $ 2,314394 87% ction Other $ Ection Staff S 265,000 $ 802.949 $ 328.726 $ 1.131.675 $ 802,949 $ 328,726 $ 1,131,675 S 818,674 72% enc $ 240.000 $ 240,000 $ $ TOTAL $ 1.250.000 1 $ 3,881,000 1 $ 351,000 $ 4,232,000 $ 3,641,000 $ 591,000 $ 4.232,000 $ 3.556.779 84% C077141 BUDGET TABLE2 Form ReWea41251MB CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 612/97 $ 2,394,700.00 390 390 CO NO. 1 Pending $ 262,274.00 $ 2,656,974.00 10.95% 203 593 H',1wpAla`eng\ENGA-7-1\C01 CHNGSTAT y Page 1 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 105" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1 Amount of this Change Order(Add)$ 262,274 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - CHANGES TO ELECTRICAL AND INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT This item is for changes to the Field Control Panel (FCP) and miscellaneous changes to the power, control and instrumentation systems. The control panel size, programmable logic controller(PLC) input and output, and the rating of the unintenuptible power supply was increased to provide the capability to update the controls of the existing sewage pumps in the future. Controls for the existing pumps were not part of this contract. The item also includes an additional level transmitter, redundant power supplies in PLC remote 1/0 rack, additional PLC programmed I/O, and computer hardware compatible with the District CRISP SCADA system standards to improve the reliability of pump station controls. This hem also provides for remote operation and monitoring of the pump station which is not part of the original design. Cost for this item includes $37,515 of Contractor extended overhead cost for 35 days of the 161-calendar day time extension. There are no extended overhead costs for the balance of the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 771-1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 96,432.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 161 Calendar Days ITEM 2—REPLACEMENT OF FUEL CONTAINMENT PIPING This Rem is for the replacement of proposed containment piping for the underground fuel tank. The piping specified was not approved by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) during a field inspection. OCHCA required that the pipe be certified by the Underwriters Laboratory, which is more stringent than state code requirements. The state code allows other independent laboratory certifications. This item contains direct costs for materials, demolition of pipe, reinstallation, testing , and OCHCA inspections. Cost for this item includes $11,475 of extended Contractor overhead associated with the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-27) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,694.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 17 Calendar Days Page 2 of 11 W ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1 ITEM 3—ADDITION OF MISSING CONDUITS AND WIRES This item is to provide additional conduits and wires for the motor control center, remote terminal unit, and the instrumentation cabinet. These conduit and wires provided control integration of the existing pumps with the pump controls for the new pumps. The conduits and wires were not part of the original design. Cost for this item includes $9,450 of extended Contractor overhead associated with the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-16) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21.332.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - ELECTRICAL CHANGES TO FANS AND FIELD CONTROL PANEL - This item is for conduit and wiring changes to the fan flow switches and the Field Control Panel (FCP) to provide isolated conduit for circuits with different voltages. The work consisted of the installation of new conduits, relays, fuse blocks, and changed wiring. Different voltage circuits are pulled in conduits dedicated to a given voltage. This change will improve safety and reliability of the pump station. Cost for this item includes $ 7,425 of extended Contractor overhead associated with the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-13) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $16,616.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 11 Calendar Days ITEM 5- CONDUIT MATERIAL CHANGE This item is for changing all power and control conduit materials to conform to the District's standard of using PVC-coated aluminum. The contract documents specify PVC coated galvanized steel conduit instead of aluminum. This change is comprised of the costs of material only. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(6)2(a) of the General provisions. (Reference FCO 771-2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7.099.00 r TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6- REROUTE EXISTING WATERLINE This item is for rerouting the existing City waterline in several locations to avoid interference with new electrical equipment and fans. These conflicts were not identified in the contract documents. Also included in this work is the repair of an existing waterline. This item was negotiated with the Contractor y Page 3 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1 ITEM 6 . REROUTE EXISTING WATERLINE (Cont.) pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,646.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7- EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE CHANGE This item is for changing the emergency light fixtures to meet District standards requiring a 12-volt system, stand-by battery with a 90-minute life, and 18-watt lamps. This change is comprised of material costs only. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1.343.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8- INTERFERENCE OF DUCT WITH CEILING JOIST This Rem is for relocating existing ceiling joist bracing not shown on the contract drawings. This relocation was necessary due to interference of this bracing with new air duct. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-9) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,595.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9-ADDITION OF HOSES FOR PUMP PACKING DRAINAGE This item is for providing pump packing drain hoses on all five new pumps. The hoses are not required by the contract documents, but are required to route the drain water to an adjacent sump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 571.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station. Contract No. 7-7-1 ITEM 10-ADDRESS SIGN ON PUMP STATION BUILDING This item is for the installation of an address sign on the existing Pump Station building in accordance with an Orange County Fire Authority requirement. The address sign was not required by the contract documents. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provision. (Reference FCO 771-18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 475.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 - OVERTIME CHARGE FOR WORK IN WET WELL This item is for Contractor overtime. OCSD asked the Contractor to work overtime to minimize the District's costs to keep the existing wet-well dry for contract work. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $236.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12- GENERATOR SILENCER SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS This item is for modification of the generator silencer support and the generator exhaust piping. The silencer support had to be changed from ceiling truss supported, as shown on the drawings, to floor supported, due to the heavy weight of the silencer. The exhaust piping as specified in the contract documents interferes with the ceiling of the Generator Building and had to be modified. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,774.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13 - FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION This item is to provide a fire hydrant just outside the Main Street Pump Station property. The work includes traffic control, excavation, live water main tie-in, piping, valves, backfill, street and sidewalk repairs and permit fees. This work was mandated by the Orange County Fire Authority and was not u Page 5 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1 ITEM 13 - FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION (Cont.) included in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-12) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,127.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14. REROUTE EXISTING CONDUIT IN MOTOR ROOM This item is for rerouting of several existing conduits in the motor room to eliminate a conflict with proposed conduits. While performing contract work, the Contractor discovered undisclosed conduits in the motor room floor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9.398.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 15— LIGHT FIXTURE WIRING AND RELOCATION This item is to provide new power supply conduits for existing station lights and to relocate proposed interior station lights to eliminate a conflict with proposed air ducting. The wiring requirements for the existing station lights were omitted from the drawings. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,794.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 16—MOTOR CONTROL REVISIONS This item is for re-wiring of existing pump electrical buckets to accept the new Lock Out Stop Jog control circuitry. The jog control schematics were omitted from the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference _ FCO 771-7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,709.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 11 U ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor SVERDRUP CIVIL INC C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station Contract No. 7-7-1 ITEM 17—SEPARATION OF VOLTAGES IN CONDUITS This item is to provide additional conduits to allow separation of circuits with different voltages. This change will improve safety and reliability of the pump station. The contract documents did not provide for separation of the different classifications. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,134.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 18 -WIRING CHANGES TO MOTOR REMOTE TEMPERATURE DETECTORS (RTDs) This item is for the addition of wiring to the RTDs for each new motor. The contract documents specify an insufficient number of wires for the temperature detectors. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,70000 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 19 - CONTROL DESIGN FOR FUEL TANK TRANSFER PUMP This item is to provide pump control for the underground tank fuel transfer pump. The contract documents do not include a control design for this pump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-15) TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,407.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 20—GENERATOR DAYTANK VENT This item is for the installation of a vent-line on the generator day tank to vent tank diesel fumes to the outside of the generator building. The applicable Fire Code mandates venting of diesel tanks to the atmosphere, but the contract documents did not include a vent line. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a)of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-22) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,809.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days U Page 7 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station, Contract No. 7-7-1 ITEM 21 —EXISTING OFFSET OF PUMP SHAFT/MOTOR ALIGNMENT This item is for additional field engineering. The work was necessary because the existing drive pump shaft penetrations did not have a common centerline as shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-24) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $392.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 22— REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING IRRIGATION GATE VALVE This item is for the replacement of an existing irrigation gate valve on the Main Street Pump Station property. The valve was leaking. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-25) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $458.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 23—EXISTING AIRIVACUUM VALVE REPAIR This item is for rebuilding the existing air/vacuum valve mounted on the East Baker Force Main. This valve showed excessive leakage when sewage was pumped through the force main. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-26) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,771.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 24—BLEEDER PIPING MODIFICATION r This item is for the installation of a gate valve on the bleeder piping of each pump system. These gate valves are not required by the contract documents, but were requested by the District maintenance department to facilitate their maintenance work.This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-28) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,844.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 8 of 11 p ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL INC C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1 ITEM 25—MOTOR BASE SEAL MODIFICATIONS This item is to provide rolled steel plate covers to seal the motor base openings. The seals are required to separate the atmosphere between the motor room and dry pit per code requirements. The revised seals are easier to maintain. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-32) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,545.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 26—ADDITIONAL EXHAUST PIPING INSULATION This item is for the installation of additional generator exhaust piping insulation. The District modified the piping from the contract documents. As a result, more insulation work had to be performed by the Contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a)of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-34) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $952.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 27— PIPING MODIFICATION IN EAST VAULT This item is field modifying the proposed 36-inch steel discharge force main. This force main is routed through an existing valve vault that had settled prior to this project. The vault was raised back to the original elevation by pressure grouting under a separate specialty contract. However, the work was unable to achieve the needed alignment. The work includes cutting,welding, lining and mating, and assisting the specialty contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-35, FCO 771-33) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,582.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 9 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX $127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1 ITEM 28—MISCELLANEOUS HVAC CHANGES This item is for the addition of a fan access door, a stainless steel frame to the south wall louver, and closures around the new doors. These items were not part of the contract documents, but had to be added for proper equipment installation, maintenance and operation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-37) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,191.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 29—UNDERGROUND TANK LEAK ALARM PROGRAMMING AND TRAINING This item is for underground tank leak alarm programming and underground tank monitor training. The District elected to modify the alarm programming of the tank to alert the District Control Center to fuel piping leaks. The training provided by the Contractor to the District was not part of the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-38) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $575.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 30- CATWALK COLUMN BRACING This item is for the installation of braces between the existing catwalk columns. The columns are not sufficiently rigid to support the attached new drive shaft bearing supports without vibrating. The work includes structural steel cutting, welding, anchor bolt installation, and painting. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-39) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,069.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $262,274.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 203 Calendar Days Page 10 of 11 U ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date. March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 203 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by the Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: June 2, 1997 Original Contract Time: 390 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 27, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 203 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 203 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 593 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 16, 1999 Projected Completion Date: April 30, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 2,394,700.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 262,274.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,656,974.00 Page 11 of 11 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 24, 1999 Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station, Contract No. 7-7-1 Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S itted by: 3 -5- y ns ruction Manager Date A rov 3-/� Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SVERDRUP CML !ems_-�4 Contractor Date H:WpAbWgVOBS 8 CONTRACTSV-7-11Chenge OrcW No.'11C0 771-014= DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 10, 1999, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 10, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Terry Andrus, General Counsel Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Stephen Sheldon, Sheldon &Associates Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Adam Probolsky, Adam D. Probolsky&Associates Shawn Boyd Toby Weissen, Carollo Engineers John M. Gullixson Mark A. Murphy STAFF PRESENT: Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Directors Absent: Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Shirley McCracken Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Mike White, Controller Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. Cost) • P.O.sox 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 March 10, 1999 (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carded to approve the minutes of the February 10, 1999, Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR • Chair Saltarelli reminded the Committee that a FAHR Committee Workshop is scheduled for April 10, 1999, at 9:00 p.m., and that all Directors are being invited. • The next regular FAHR meeting is scheduled for April 14, 1999, at 5:00 p.m. • There will be a closed session tonight regarding the status of labor negotiations with the Supervisory and Professional Employees. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that Supervisor Jim Silva will be on the Board and will be a member of the FAHR Committee beginning in April. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on his trip to Washington, D.C. last week. He advised that he, and representatives of the Municipal Water District of Orange County and the Orange County Water District, met with politicians from Orange County regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) project, and their continued interest in receiving funding of$20 million from the Bureau of Reclamation to help support the cost. They also met with some Watershed members from Riverside and San Bernardino County to discuss watershed issues such as flood control and manure management. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Mr. Streed advised that several reports were placed before the Directors just prior to the meeting. • The Treasurer's Report for February was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. • A copy of a letter sent to Director McCraken, in response to some questions that the City of Anaheim staff had regarding connection fees, was also distributed to the Committee. Most of the City's questions could probably have been answered if they had access to the Carollo report which was sent along with the letter. Mr. Streed noted that the questions from the City were well drafted. • A one-page rating summary for item 13(b) was also placed before the Committee. • Another hand-out will also be distributed which responds to questions raised at the Committee's February meeting regarding Capital Project cost allocations. y Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 March 10, 1999 • Mr. Slreed announced that Board Secretary Penny Kyle will be taking over the FAHR Committee Secretary responsibilities, due to a change in procedures. Penny will be preparing the Agenda and taking the minutes possibly as early as next month. • General Manager Don McIntyre further advised the Committee that Penny will be taking over the responsibilities of all three Committees. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources Mike Peternan had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman reported that staff developed a new Earthquake Preparedness brochure on personal wastewater management, and worked with the Orange County Health Care Agency in compiling the material to make sure it met their specifications and concerns. The Health Care Agency will also be distributing the brochure. Copies are being sent to the cities, and will also be included in the packets we hand out at the Orange County Fair. • The information contained in another brochure distributed to the Directors in their Board packets last month was received from an outside agency. Staff edited the material and designed the brochure. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Office of Pollution Prevention, was so pleased with the brochure that they have asked if they can use it. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Terry Andrus had no report. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- C) A. FAHR99-12: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. B. FAHR99-13: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report, C. FAHR99-14: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of February 25, 1999. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. There were none. v Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ° Page 4 March 10, 1999 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A) through 12(C) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. FAHR99-15: 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Makesense, Inc., for utility and telecommunications auditing services; and 2) Approve such services on a contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) 50% fee for all recovered overcharges and, b) the equivalent of twelve (12) months savings for all implemented cost reduction strategies. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. The Committee further directed staff to attempt to negotiate the fee downward. B. FAHR99-16: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for a consultant to review sewer service fees and Assessors data, and authorize the General Manager to enter into a contingency fee agreement for services for a period of 12 months. Mr. Streed reviewed the results of the interview panels for the Committee. A lengthy discussion took place regarding whether or not the successful bidder should perform a one or four-year collection effort, whether to use the new rate structure or the old one if a four-year effort is selected, and the fees that the two bidders will charge for a one- year effort. The Committee was unable to agree on awarding the project to either bidder because one of the bidding firms had not included a firm price in their proposal for a one-year effort. Several motions were made, amended and withdrawn. The final approved motion follows: Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried, with one No vote, to direct staff to contact both bidders requesting that they submit a best and final proposal, with qualifications, on a one-year basis. This item is to be brought back to the Committee next month with a staff recommendation. C. FAHR99-17: Receive and file the preliminary FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement Program Budget. Director Swan requested that staff identify any projects that are brand new so that a distinction can be made, since there are some in design and under construction. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION A. Plant Reinvention and Automation Project Status Report. Engineering Director David Ludwin introduced Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer, who gave a presentation on the status of Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention and Automation Project. �v Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 March 10, 1999 (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item 19 (A)(1). At approximately 8:05 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:10 p.m. Submitted by: //�/ lq,w hat / 'Lahore Crane FAHR Committee Secretary H1wpdbYm IOcmm�MYPtlm DMWI= FAHR COMMITTEE MeecngDm To3r.em. 03110t" 0312= AGENDA REPORT I[em NumEer hem rz1.1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1999 (FAHR99-12) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \YW nWdIM9 Al1M1nV10[n,wVIINFaMtlTW�L.WP912 Wr n.A.e. 1W7W Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of February 1999 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts February 28, 1999 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 15,004,486 5.5 Union Bank Checking Account 488.078 3.7 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 162.000 3.7 PIMCO—Shon4erm Portfolio 18,518.258 &0 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 298,626,210 4.2 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,104 5.2 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,196.828 6.0 Petty Cash 4.400 — TOTAL $355.002,364 ALTERNATIVES None. CEOA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SK:Ic \YWhWpt W GSNM]1P[nn1FNiRN�bW Wn1F�lldrc IMM Page 2 ReportPrepared by Finance, 3/10/99, 10:14 AM Monthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances $400,000,000 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,, II Debt Service Reserves DLAIF II Dist I I :.... ..... ..... :.... :.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... yam.❖.�., ,�.❖.•., ,❖.❖., .❖.❖., ,•.❖.•., .•••.•.•,� •o.•oo. �.:.:.❖. ❖:❖:� i.❖.•.o :.:.:.:.:. •'•'•'•'•' F ; GO Bond MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 28 February 1999) Liquid Operating Monies (603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current MarketValue Estimate: Mellon0 $18:518:258 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18,565,155 Mellon $18,565,138 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.42 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $78,675 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 61% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.31 0.34 3 Months: 1.13 1.08 12 Months: 5.46 4.92 Year-to-Date: 0.71 0.71 N..I..IFINANCEIII9IKOMMCUPLELIQ0199.RPT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 28 February 1999) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: Q��y1 $299,332,242 e11onO $298,626,210 Historical Cost: PIMCO $301,389,682 Mellon $301,074,268 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2AI Of Index: 2.37 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,315,624 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 16% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return (%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: (0.82) (0.90) 3 Months: 0.10 (0.04) 12 Months: 6.39 5.99 Year-to-Date: (0.30) (0.40) H.L.JPINANCEQIOWOZ KUAMPLEL-0U299.RPT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BySECTOR BASE[ USDA 28-FEB-1999 XB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS . . COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,668,659.00 2,668,659.00 14.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,755,236.00 3,755,236.00 20.051 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 1,383,624.67 1,383,624-.67 7.39% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 100,572.67 100,572.67 0.54% 0.00 4,670.42 4.64 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 7,908,092.34 7,900,092.34 42.23% 0.00 4,670.42 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,310,824.00 17.68% -14,441.63 210,375.00 6.35 U.S. AGENCIES 3,699,104.60 3,686,717.00 19.69% -12,387.60 178,895.00 4.85 BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,257,722.00 2,244,550.00 11.98% -13,172.00 187,625.00 8.36 INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 059,027.00 4.59% -4,726.00 60,562.50 7.05 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 511,200.00 509,045.00 2.72% -2,155.00 40,000.00 7.86 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10,657,045.23 10,610,163.00 56.65% -46,882.23 677,457.50 6.38 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 210,014.77 210,014.77 1.121 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 210,014.77 210,014.77 1.12% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ............... -------- ...=.o.. ---------- ._......_....... ..s.=. NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,775,152.34 18,728,270.11 100.00% -46,882.23 682,127.92 3.64 UCSE'U75222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 28-FEB-1999 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH d CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 10,485,366.51 10,485,366.51 3.46% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -31,438,985.94 -31,438,985.94 -30.37% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,280,656.67 2,280,656.67 0.75% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED LAND BANK - LESS INN IYR 299,167.00 299,167.00 0.30► 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 256,149.42 256,148.42 0.08► 0.00 11,895.08 4.64 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH d CASH EQUIVALENTS -18,117,647.34 -18,117,647.34 -5.98% 0.00 11,895.08 -0.07 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 130,310,695.60 129,214,489.91 42.61% -1,096,205.69 8,201,507.42 6.35 U.S. AGENCIES 49,177,267.51 48,770,167.59 16.08% -407,099.92 3,055,424.24 6.26 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,580,469.75 16,457,403.13 5.43% -123,065.62 1,057,500.00 6.43 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,221,064.81 5,205,690.52 1.72% -15,174.29 354,594.79 6.81 FHLMC POOLS 13,272,384.18 13,152,091.45 4.34% -120,292.73 914,773.56 6.96 FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,965,452.21 7,006,329.57 2.31% 40,877.36 439,418.75 6.27 FNMA POOLS 4,253,517.19 4,253,517.19 1.40% 0.00 251,262.00 5.91 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 211,517.23 212,321.01 0.07% 803.78 13,114.07 6.18 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,332,878.61 4,359,469.26 1.44% 26,590.65 250,487.38 5.75 BANKING d FINANCE 66,331,724.37 66,181,208.62 21.83% -150,515.75 3,948,575.09 5.97 INDUSTRIAL 15,037,689.00 14,356,493.90 4.73% -681,195.10 1,162,527.00 8.10 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,574,475.00 2.50% 77,220.00 450,000.00 5.94 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 319,291,914.46 316,743,857.15 104.46% -2,448,057.31 20,099,264.30 6.35 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,588,422.87 4,588,422.87 1.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,588,422.87 4,588,422.87 1.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----e........ ........ ................. ................ ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 305,662,689.99 303,214,632.68 100.004 2,448,057.31 20,111,159.38 6.63 Page 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I OCSF07511202 3999/02/28 RUN DATE OVO4/99 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS 100,572.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM .000 4.644 AAA 100.000 100,572.67 1.27 996085247 100,572.67 ,54 400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MG CORP DISC 4.766 .000 P-1 98.616 394,464.44 4.98 313396FT5 MAT OS/18/1999 3%,464.44 2.13 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MG CORP DISC 4.775 .000 P-1 98.846 3,360,771.56 42.49 313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 3,360,771.56 19.15 900,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 4.834 .000 P-1 98.805 889,962.00 11.25 34539URM6 04/21/1999 889,962.00 4.81 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 98.760 888,840.00 11.23 36959MS3 05/05/1999 8681840.00 4.80 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.944 .000 P-1 98.873 889,857.00 11.25 02581SR78 04/07/1999 889,857.00 4.81 1,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSH DISC 5.072 .000 P-1 98.830 1,383,6M.67 17.49 313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 1,383,624.67 7.47 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.699 .112 7,908,092.34 IDO.OU 7,908,092.M 42.72 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 4.860 4.852 MA 99.641 3,699,104.60 34.74 3133M7EN2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DD 01/28/99 3,686,717.00 19.91 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP IST A REF MG 5.001 7.858 AA3 101.809 511,200.00 4.79 264399089 8.000% 12/01/1999 OD 11/01/94 509,045.00 2.75 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.654 Al 104.709 529,010.00 4.93 171205AT4 13.2502 10/15/1999 523,545.00 2.83 $50,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 7.050 AZ 101.062 865,753.00 8.09 718154BX4 7.1252 12/01/1999 OD IV01/92 859,027.00 4.64 900,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN 5.305 6.206 A2 100.705 909,657.00 8.54 37042M7G2 6.2507. 01/11/2000 OD 01/11/94 906,345.00 4.89 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 2 OCSF07511102 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/99 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 21.54.23 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL 300,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC MTS 5.363 7.553 A2 100.950 303,930.00 2.85 073902AP3 7.6257. 09/15/2999 OD 09/21/94 302,850.00 1.64 3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.354 AAA 100.328 3,325:265.63 31.20 912827X72 06.3757. 05/15/1999 00 05/15/96 3,310,824.00 17.88 800,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN RSB00130 5.653 8.255 A3 102.362 515:125.00 4.82 89350MEP1 8.4507. O1/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 511,810.00 2.76 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.058 6.073 10,657,045.23 100.00 1016101163.00 57.30 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 4.929 3.931 18:565:137.57 300.00 18,318:255.34 100.00 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1999/02/2B ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUM DATE 03/04/99 RUM TIME 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 256,148.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NOW .000 4.644 AAA 100.00E 256,148.42 9.03 996085247 256,148.42 .08 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LM NTG CORP DISC 4.773 .000 P-1 99.722 299,167.0E 10.54 313396BB6 MAT 03/15/1999 299,167.00 .09 2,000,000.00 DU PONT BE MENGUR DISC 4.84E .000 P-1 99.093 1,981,866.67 69.SO 26354BRT1 04/27/1999 1,981,866.67 .62 300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 99.597 298,790.00 10.53 19121EQSS 03/26/1999 296,790.00 .09 -------- ------- ----------------- -----___- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.032 .769 2,835,972.09 100.00 2,835,972.09 .ee FIKED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY MR? GLOBAL NT .000 5.914 A2 97.988 11992,800.00 .61 0663650M4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 2,959,760.00 .61 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTH .000 5.793 Al 100.23E 3,498,635.00 1.10 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 3,508,190.00 1.10 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR GO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.363 Al 99.765 1,998,613.60 .62 345397SC8 FLTG NT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/98 1,995,300.00 .62 7,300,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR ATM TR 0 00177 .000 4.362 Al 99.953 6,999,748.00 2.24 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 OD 03/30/94 71096,663.00 2.22 3,950,000.E0 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.542 A2 99.373 3,918,768.50 1.23 370425QVS FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 3,925,253.50 1.23 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL. INC SR NT .000 6.188 A3 99.998 2,999,310.00 .94 423328A26 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 OD 04/27/% 2,999,%0.00 .94 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HIM .000 5.887 A3 100.343 41000,000.00 1.26 42333HJM3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 4,013,720.00 1.26 4,000,000.00 NODS EHOLD FIN CO HIM .000 5.989 A2 99.311 4,000,000.00 1.25 44181KIA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,972,440.00 1.24 YLOAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE : 03/04/99 ORANGE CTY-LDNC TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY TO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- - 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTH SR 000570 .000 5.772 A2 99.511 999,108.90 .31 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 OD 09/04/98 995,110.00 .31 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES .000 5.673 AA3 100.218 7,003,710.00 2.21 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO OV23198 7,015,260.00 2.20 4,382,697.56 STUDENT LN MXTG ASSM 1997-1 Al .000 5.746 AAA 99.470 4,332,878.61 1.37 78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,359,469.26 1.36 7,163,870.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.699 3.646 AAA 99.437 7,140,713.77 2.24 91M27US 3.6257. 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,123,537.41 2.23 10,MS,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.729 3.497 AAA 96.500 10,066,075.00 3.15 9IM272M3 3.37514 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 9,963,021.50 3.12 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 6.ON AAA 102.656 9,034,223.67 2.75 9128272G6 06.250X O1/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,725,760.00 2.73 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL NTG ASSN HTN 4.943 6.456 AM 103.312 20,012,510.00 6.19 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DD 03/27/97 19,629,28E.00 6.14 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 5.234 9.082 AM 122.500 6,233,393.75 1.93 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/US/83 6,125,000.00 1.92 31,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.205 AM 102.734 32,509,817.31 10.21 912827Z54 06.3757.. 09/30/2001 OD 09/30/96 12,361,230.00 10.13 17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 7.101 MA 105.623 18,368,684.02 5.70 93282Mn 07.500X 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18,061,875.00 5.65 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.402 6.070 AM 102.969 5,677,682.23 1.78 912827MS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 5,663,295.00 1.77 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.533 6.578 AM 103.875 8,865,156.26 2.78 112027MO 06.6257. 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 8,829,375.00 2.76 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.386 AM 126.516 6,698,250.00 2.07 91MINGO 11.875X 21/15/2003 00 10/05/83 6,578,832.00 2.06 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.388 AA3 101.756 1,543,215.00 .48 046003HYS 6.SOOX 07/15/2002 OD 07/11/97 1,526,340.00 .48 1,000,000.00 NELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.793 A3 99.259 999,730.00 .31 42333WJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 992,590.00 .31 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATIM RIM TINE 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YM AT CURRENT QUALITY HARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ 16,100,000.00 V S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.274 AAA 103.5% 16,581,067.03 5.26 9IM272VI 06.5002 05/31/2002 00 06/02/97 16,676,634.00 5.22 - 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.804 6.470 A2 101.078 2,060,739.00 .63 81240QSN6 6.5402 02/20/2003 DD OV20/97 2,026,613.90 .63 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.086 AAA 102.687 5,086,402.25 1.62 9128272U 06.2502 OV28/2002 00 OV28/97 5,134,350.00 1.61 4,230,000.00 COHORT TO MR FNMA 11TN 5.841 5.907 MA 100.556 4,253,517.19 1.34 IIFSI16M 5.%O% 03/25/2029 4,253,517.19 1.33 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.849 6.534 A2 101.468 3,073,170.00 .96 81240QJAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 00 07/09/97 3,044,040.00 .95 14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NATL IRO ASSN NTH 5.882 5.908 AAA 96.656 14,560,462.50 4.50 31364GLO9 5.710% W2.5/2008 DO 12/LS/98 14,256,760.00 4.46 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBARK CHARLOTTE N C NTH 5.882 5.852 "1 99.968 5,99fi,400.00 1.89 638SGJDE6 5.850I 04/07/2000 00 04/07/98 51998,080.00 1.88 1,028,223.15 FNLMC HULTICL HTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.993 100.125 1,026,n7.21 .32 5133T0MS 5.9002 06/15/2017 1,029,508.43 .32 1,430,184.44 CHASE HAMHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.8% AAA 100.097 1,427,223.52 .45 161614AE2 5.90D2 11/LS/2001 DO 11/LS/95 1,431,571.72 .45 2,500,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.301 AA 102.172 2,526,725.00 .79 590185KP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 _ 2,529,300.00 .79 7,500,000.00 BELLSWTX TELECOI90MICATION3 6.010 5.941 AAA 100.993 7,497,255.00 2.39 079867AOI5 6.0007. 06/15/2002 GO 06/LS/98 7,574,475.00 2.37 1,250,000.00 GENERAL NTRS ACCEP CORP MS 6.032 6.944 A2 102.602 1,283,862.50 .40 3704MF0 7.1252 05/01/2001 OD 05/01/97 1,282,525.00 .40 1,000,000.00 GENERAL WAS ACCEP CORP MM 6.046 6.585 A2 101.750 1,018,520.00 .32 37042WGKI 6.7002 04/30/2002 OD 04/25/96 1,017,500.00 .32 6,250,000.00 COIMIT TO PUR GNMA SF HTG 6.060 6.184 AAA 97.031 6,195,312.50 1.91 OIN060635 6.000Y. 03/25/2029 6,064,437.50 1.90 211,517.24 FIFTH THIRD M AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.177 AAA 100.380 211,517.23 .06 31677EAA4 6.2002 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 212,321.02 .07 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 6 OMF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/9, ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE HARKEY VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 2,500,000.00 LEMAN BROS HLBGS MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.412 BAA1 99.816 2,509,175.00 .78 5ZS17PLMl 6.400Y. 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 2,495,400.00 .78 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL ITC ASSN HTN 6.291 6.105 AAA 102.047 4,488,705.00 1." 31364CRV5 6.2307. 03/02/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,592,115.00 1.44 3,933,484.75 FKLHC HULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.280 AAA 100.697 3,937,787.00 1.25 313ME95 6.3247. 08/25/2032 31960,901.14 1.24 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC 6.330 6.659 A2 101.370 21031,960.00 .64 07390ZAH1 6.750% 04/15/2003 2,027,400.00 .63 5,000,000.00 LEM AN BROS HLOGS HTN 000196 6.364 6.646 BAAI 100.062 51039,450.00 1.57 52517PJ 6.650% 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 51003,100.00 1.57 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.668 AZ 101.228 1,317,619.35 .41 07390UWO 6.750% 05/01/2001 BD 04/26/96 1,321,025.40 .41 10,500,000.00 COHNIT TO MR GMHA SF HTC 6.478 6.567 AAA 98.981 10,385,156.25 3.28 DIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 10,392,965.63 3.25 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.449 AM 100.796 2,000,888.00 .63 3133TOPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 2101S1920.00 .63 2,259,153.95 FHLMC HULTICLASS CTF SIR 1620Z 6.563 6.452 AAA 92.988 21103,014.01 .66 3133T37A4 6.000% 12/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 2,100,732.59 .66 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN HTH 6.577 6.470 AAA 102.391 8,012,576.00 2.58 31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 UD 04/18/96 8,191,280.00 2.56 9,000,000.00 PHILIP NORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.965 A2 303.176 9,903,780.00 2.93 71SIS4802 9.25UX 02/IS/2000 9,285,840.00 2.91 13,068,193.65 FNLHC CROUP RCS-0476 6.626 6.955 AAA 100.642 13,272,384.18 4.15 31280DQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 OD 02/01/98 13,152,091.45 4.12 3,000,000.00 G N A C MED TERM MTS 6.660 8.415 A2 102.492 3,227,070.00 .97 37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 OD 1/10/95 3,074,760.00 .96 3,048,113.62 DNA II POOL 8080088M 6.705 6.767 AAA 101.594 3,114,791.12 .97 36225CC20 6.875Y. 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 31096,700.55 .97 2,071,956.90 CIDIA I1 POOL $0080023 6.869 6.876 MA 101.797 2,106,273.69 .66 36225CAZ9 7.0007. IV20/2026 DD 12/01/96 2,109,189.97 .66 YLDAIUL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07522202 1999/02/20 RUN DATE 03/04/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23 PAR VALUE YM AT WRRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ _ ............ ---------- - 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 0.367 AAA 157.984 41029,030.33 1.24 9128100A 13.2507. 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 3,949,600.00 1.24 ________ ------- TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 4.166 6.106 519,193,914.K 100.00 u6,74S,0q.13 99.12 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.166 6.102 322,027,006.5E 100.00 319,579,829.N 100.00 V�ZWVVLUV MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASH USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PINCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-FEB-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000 313384SK4 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000 CM HAT 02/03/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-FEB-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000 313384BK4 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000 CW HAT 02/03/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR SUB-ADV ADMINISTRATION FEE LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES O1-FEB-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313396SH5 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW HAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH i CASH EQUIVALENTS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 -298,790.00 99.596666 19123EQS5 03/26/1999 24-FEB-1999 298,790.00 298,790.00 99.596666 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 -298,790.00 99.596666 19121EQSS 03/26/1999 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 0.00 99.596666 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-FEB-1999 -1,981,866.67 -1,981,866.67 99.093333 26354BRT1 04/27/1999 19-FEB-1999 1,981,066.67 1,901,066.67 99.093333 B GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC is-FEB-1999 -1,981,866.67 -1,981,866.67 99.093333 26354BRT1 04/27/1999 18-FEB-1999 -1,981,666.67 0.00 99.093333 PC GOLD14AN SACHS i CO, NY 18-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 1 WF 11\VJl CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TMIOO BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 0.00 99.205000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 04-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.DDD000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333 313396DB6 MAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 299,167.00 299,167.00 99.722333 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333 313396DB6 HAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 0.00 99.722333 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.5Q 98.846222 313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 3,360,771.56 3,360,771.56 96.946222 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 98.846222 313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 0.00 98.846222 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110 313396FT5 HAT 05/10/1999 01-FEB-1999 394,464.44 394,464.44 98.616110 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIHCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110 313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 0.00 98.616110 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Paq,. 2 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -vLOCAL/BASE BASE- USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FES-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 0.00 99.205000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 04-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333 313396DB6 HAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 299,167.00 299,167.00 99.722333 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333 313396DB6 MAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 0.00 99.722333 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 98.846222 313396FDO HAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 3,360,771.56 3,360,771.56 98.846222 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 99.046222 313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,171.56 0.00 99.846222 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MSG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110 313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 01-FEB-1999 394,464.44 394,464.44 98.616110 B GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110 313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 0.00 98.616110 FC GOLDMAN SACHS L CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -888,940.00 -888,840.00 98.760000 36959JS53 05/05/1999 01-FEB-1999 888,840.00 888,840.00 98.760000 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -889,940.00 -888,840.00 98.760000 36959JS53 05/05/1999 01-FEB-1999 -898,840.00 0.00 98.760000 PC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC O1-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663888 74271SPSO 02/26/1999 01-FEB-1999 2,292,269.45 2,292,269.45 99.663888 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC O1-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663888 742719PSO 02/26/1999 01-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 0.00 99.663886 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,665.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 -16,665.50 1.000000 996085247 01-FEB-1999 16,665.50 16,665.50 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,665.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 -16,665.50 1.000000 996085247 01-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 0.00 1.000000 PC O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 377.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 -377.01 1.000000 996085247 02-FEB-1999 377.01 377.01 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 377.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 -377.01 1.000000 996085247 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 0.00 1.000000 PC 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 3 , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS' -J LOCAL/BASE BASS! USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TMIOD BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 475,682.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 -475,692.74 1.000000 996085247 02-FEB-1999 475,682.74 475,682.74 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 475,682.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 -475,682.74 1.000000 996085247 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 0.00 1.000000 FC 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 239,228.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 -239,228.44 1.000000 996085247 05-FEB-1999 239,228.44 239,228.44 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 239,228.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 -239,228.44 1.000000 996085247 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 0.00 1.000000 FC 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,814.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 -27,914.25 1.000000 996085247 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 27,814.25 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,814.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 -27,814.25 1.000000 996085247 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 0.00 1.000000 FC 11-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,206,306.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 -2,206,306.40 1.000000 996085247 16-FEB-1999 2,206,306.40 2,206,306.40 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,206,306.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 -2,206,306.40 1.000000 996085247 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 0.00 1.000000 Page 4 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,517.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-FEB-1999 -48,517.78 -48,517.78 1.000000 996085247 17-FEB-1999 48,517.78 48,517.78 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,517.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-FEB-1999 -40,517.78 -48,517.78 1.000000 996085247 17-FEB-1999 -48,517.78 0.00 1.000000 FC 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,283.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 -62,283.27 1.000000 996095247 22-FEB-1999 62,283.27 62,283.27 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,283.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 -62,283.27 1.000000 996085247 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 0.00 1.000000 PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,160.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 -12,160.95 1.000000 996085247 23-FEB-1999 12,160.95 12,160.95 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,160.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 -12,160,95 1.000000 9960B5247 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 0.00 1.000000 PC 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 -10,633,33 1.000000 996085247 25-FEB-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 -10,833.33 1.000000 Paq r. 5 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS ,-LOCAL/BASE BASet USD O1-FEB-1999 - 26-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS SASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 0.00 1.000000 FC 25-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,367.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 -16,367.48 1.000000 996085247 26-FEB-1999 16,367.48 16,367.48 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,367.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 -16,367.48 1.000000 996085247 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 0.00 1.000000 FC 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 149,314.33 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-FEB-1999 -149,314.33 -149,314.33 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 16-FEB-1999 149,314.33 149,314.33 1.000000 B 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 94,990.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 23-FEB-1999 -94,990.00 -94,990.00 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 23-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 1.000000 B 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.632812 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,264,550.75 98.632812 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750 O1N060627 6.0001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,154,296.68 -6,154,296.8E 98.468750 BC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1990 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 6 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USE, O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ------------------------------------------------______---__--- __________________ ____________________ __________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-DEC-1998 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 0.00 101.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 6,058,125.00 6,059,125.00 100.968750 OIN062623 6.5001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750 01N062623 6.5001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNHA SF MTG 25-FEB-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 98.906250 OIN062656 6.5001 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 10,385,156.25 10,385,156.25 98.906250 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.88 99.453125 02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -1,491,796.88 0.00 99.453125 PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLNC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 1,491,796.88 1,491,796.08 99.453125 02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN=1999 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.98 99.453125 BC GREENWICH CAP MKTS, MEN YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 1lsW001UU LLW. 1ttUJ1 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ' 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 1,491,796.88 1,491,796.88 99.453125 02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 1,491,796.88 0.00 99.453125 FCC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500 02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -4,699,531.25 0.00 98.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 . 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 98.937500 02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 98.937500 02R000613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 4,699,531.25 0.00 98.937500 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 04-FEB-1999 -303,930.00 -303,930.06 101.310000 073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 303,930.00 303,930.00 101.310000 B MESIRON 4 COMPANY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 04-FEB-1999 -9,150.00 -9,150.00 101.310000 073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DD 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 101.310000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC HIS 04-FEB-1999 -313,080.00 -313,080.00 101.310000 073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 -313,080.00 0.00 101.310000 PC MESIRON i COMPANY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Pagn 9 C800C-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-ROV-1998 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 BC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500 FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,075.00 100.843750 1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,675.00 0.00 100.843750 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1990 2,016,975.00 2,016,875.00 100.843750 11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750 SC GOLDHAM SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 2,016,875.00 2,016,075.00 100.843750 1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,016,875.00 0.00 100.843750 FCC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIKCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNKA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000 11F011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000 B GOLDMAN SACHS c CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 2,001,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000 11F0I1628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000 BC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -2,237,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.328125 11F011628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.328125 Page 9 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD . O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ B BEAR STEARNS i CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 2,231,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.326125 IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,231,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.320125 BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA 11TH 04-FEB-1999 -2,010,625,00 -2,010,625.00 100.531250 IIF0I1636 5.940% 03/25/2029 24-MAR-1999 2,010,625.00 2,010,625.00 100.531250 B GOLDMAN SACHS f CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH 11-FEB-1999 -2,242,892.19 -2,242,092.19 100.578125 IIF0I1636 5.940% 03/25/2029 24-MAR-1999 2,242,892.19 2,242,092.19 100.578125 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 171,907.15 171,907.15 90.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 376.47 376.47 98.937500 31283HETI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -173,753.20 FHLNC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 172,283.62 172,283.62 99.937500 31283KBTI 6.0001 06/01/2020 DO 06/01/90 14-JAN-1999 172,283.62 0.00 98.937500 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1990 999,268.66 999,268.66 99.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500 BC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 19-OCT-1990 2,108.33 2,198.33 98.937500 Page 10 .amvovaw MGLLVN 'rKUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 96.937500 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP YGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 1,001,456.99 1,001,456.99 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.0001 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736.333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 728,510.14 728,510.14 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 I8C - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 730,105.53 730,105.53 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 730,105.53 0.00 98.937500 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2D28 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 728,510.14 99.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY -- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 .LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP BGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 8GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -730,105.53 -730,105.53 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -730,105.53 0.00 98.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 1'a9rt 11 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS' -yLOCAWBASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN ]ASS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE SARIS/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP YGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/90 14-JAN-1999 171,907.15 171,907.15 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -376.47 -376.47 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 tB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,283.62 -172,203.62 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -172,283.62 0.00 98.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 999,268.66 999,268.66 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -2,188.33 -2,108.33 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 1,009,999.91 FHLNC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1996 1,001,456.99 -1,001,456.99 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -3,073,170.00 -3,073,170.00 102.439000 812400JAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 3,073,170.00 3,073,170.00 102.439000 B GOLD14AN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PI14CO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -552.50 -552.50 102.439000 81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 102.439000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 12 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS`-JLOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -3,073,722.50 -3,073,722.50 102.439000 812400JAI 6.6301 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 -3,073,722.50 0.00 102.439000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,276,562.50 -5,276,562.50 105.531250 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 5,276,562.50 5,276,562.50 105.531250 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -92,420.58 -92,420.58 105.531250 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.531250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 5,276,562.50 5,276,562.50 105.531250 912B272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 -5,276,562.50 -5,276,562.50 105.531250 BC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 92,420.58 92,420.58 105.531250 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.531250 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,DDO,ODD.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,251,953.13 -5,251,953.13 105.039062 9128272SO 06.6254 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 5,251,953.13 5,251,953.13 105.039062 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -92,420.58 -92,420.58 105.039062 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.039062 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,344,373.71 -5,344,373.71 105.039062 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 -5,344,373.71 0.00 105.039062 FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS --LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -3,111,562.50 -3,111,562.50 103.719750 9120273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 3,111,562.50 3,111,562.50 103.718750 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -88,052.49 -80,052.49 103.718750 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 103.710750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -3,199,614.99 -3,199,614.99 103.718750 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 -3,199,614.99 0.00 103.718750 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1996 2,493,950.00 2,493,950.00 100.562500 999ACN396 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,493,950.00 -2,493,950.00 100.562500 BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 2,493,950.00 2,493,950.00 100.562500 999ACN396 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,493,950.00 0.00 100.562500 FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,239.64 FHL4C MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 -11,239.64 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 11,239.64 11,239.64 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,239.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 -11,239.64 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS Page 14 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556 02600KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 -95.00 -95.00 99.497556 0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAM-1999 -1,890,548.56 -1,890,548.56 99.497556 02680KQ50 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556 0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556 S LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 95.00 95.00 99.497556 0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 1,890,548.56 99.497556 02680KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556 PC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,885,429.11 2,885,429.12 99.497555 02680KOSO 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 -2,885,429.11 -2,885,429.11 99.497555 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 5,194.22 5,194.22 99.497555 0268OK050 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497555 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 n CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 26-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,890,623.33 2,890,623.33 99.497555 02680KQ50 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 2,890,623.33 0.00 99.497555 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 1,983,075.56 1,983,075.56 99.153778 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 -1,983,075.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153779 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 7,016.66 7,016.66 99.153778 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.153778 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 1,990,092.22 1,990,092.22 99.153778 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 2,990,092.22 0.00 99.153778 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/HONEY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 481.50 481.50 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.205000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 298,096.50 298,096.50 99.205000 26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 298,096.50 0.00 99.205000 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 3,070,506.67 3,078,506.67 99.306667 34539UQK1 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 -3,070,506.67 -3,078,506.67 99.306667 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 16 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 8,519.83 8,519.83 99.306667 34539UQKI 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.306667 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 3,O87,026.50 3,087,026.50 99.306667 34539UQK1 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 3,087,026.50 0.00 99.306667 PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 794,453.33 794,453.33 99.306666 34539UQKI 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 -794,453.33 -794,453.33 99.306666 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 2,306.67 2,306.67 99.306666 34539UQK1 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.306666 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 796,760.00 796,760.00 99.306666 34539UOKI 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 796,760.00 0.00 99.306666 PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 190,022.00 198,022.00 99.011000 36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 -198,022.00 -198,022.00 99.011000 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 1,950.94 1,950.94 99.011000 36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.011000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 199,972.94 199,972.94 99.011000 36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 199,972.94 0.00 99.011000 Page 17 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD" O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,292,269.45 2,292,269.45 99.663089 74271SPS8 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663809 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,473.77 2,473.77 99.663889 74271SPSO 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.663889 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,294,743.22 2,294,743.22 99.663889 74272SPSB 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 2,294,743.22 0.00 99.663889 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,615.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 1.000000 996085247 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,615.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 1.000000 996085247 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-FEB-1999 0,00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -313,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-FEB-1999 313,090.00 313,080.00 1.000000 996085247 09-FEB-1999 -313,000.00 -313,080.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -313,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-FEB-1999 313,080.00 313,080.00 1.000000 996005247 09-FEB-1999 313,080.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,007.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MrMT "'-FF.R-11'�q 199,007.16 159,007.16 1.000000 IN CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -JLOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORA GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 09-FEB-1999 -159,007.16 -159,007.16 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,007.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGHT 09-FEB-1999 159,007.16 159,007.16 1.000000 996085247 09-FEB-1999 159,007.16 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,926,266.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 1,926,266.47 1.000000 996085247 19-FEB-1999 -1,926,266.47 -1,926,266.47 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,926,266,47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 1,926,266.47 1.000000 996085247 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 0.00 1.000000 FC 19-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,800.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 203,900.00 1.000000 996005247 24-FEB-1999 -203,800.00 -203,900.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 203,800.00 1.000000 996085247 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -761.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 761.67 761.67 1.000000 996085247 26-FEB-1999 -761.67 -761.67 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -761.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 761.67 761.67 1.000000 996085247 26-FEB-1999 761.67 0.00 1.000000 PC 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 19 _ sac Suva ,nuai CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -195,749.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-JAN-1999 195,749.00 195,749.00 100.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 18-JAN-1999 -195,749.00 -195,749.00 100.000000 S 18-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -149,314.33 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-FEB-1999 149,314.33 149,314.33 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 17-FEB-1999 -149,314.33 -149,314.33 1.000000 S 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,990.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 24-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 24-FEB-1999 -94,990.00 -94,990.00 1.000000 S 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.546875 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,371.06 -5,371.66 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 61159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875 O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 0.00 98.546975 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,203,125.00 6,203,125.00 99.250000 01N060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,203,125.00 0.00 99.250000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.75 -6,064,218.75 101.070313 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.070313 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -4,218.75 -4,218.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.75 -6,064,218.75 101.070313 OIN062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,064,219.75 0.00 101.070313 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,549,164.06 -4,548,164.06 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.070312 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -3,164.06 -3,164.06 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,540,164.06 -4,548,164.06 101.070312 OIN062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312 O1H062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.06 3,164.06 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,210.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070313 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218,75 4,218.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF NTG O6-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAM-1999 6,064,218.75 0.00 101.070313 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,068,671.86 6,068,671.86 101.144531 OIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,068,671.86 0.00 101.144531 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 4,551,503.90 4,551,503.90 101.144531 01N062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 4,551,503.90 0.00 201.144531 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 21 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LDCAL/BASE BASE: USD = 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 6,142,578.13 6,142,578.13 98.281250 02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 6,142,578.13 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 -6,142,578.13 -6,142,578.13 98.281250 02R060613 6.0004 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 6,191,328.13 6,191,328.13 98.281250 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 40,750.00 48,750.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 -6,142,578.13 -6,142,578.13 9B.281250 02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -6,142,578.13 0.00 98.281250 FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,012,343.76 2,012,343.76 100.617100 1IF011628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,164.43 -2,007,164.43 100.617180 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 5,179.33 5,179.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 -2,012,343.76 -2,012,343.76 100.617188 1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,164.43 2,007,164.43 100.617108 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,179.33 -5,179.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,012,343.76 2,012,343.76 100.617188 IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,005.76 -2,007,005.76 100.617188 S ----------- 5,338.00 5,338.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,244,634.38 2,244,634.38 100.656250 11F011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,237,811.43 -2,237,811.43 100.656250 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 6,822.95 6,022.95 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-FEB-1999 2,244,634.39 2,244,634.38 100.656250 IIF0I1620 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,237,756.65 -2,237,756.65 100.656250 Page 22 L... .lv. MLLLVN anua'r CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 6,877.73 6,977.73 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 21-FEB-1999 -2,244,634.30 -2,244,634 .38 100.656250 1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,756.65 2,237,756.65 100.656250 SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -6,877.73 -6,877.73 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -723,677.95 -723,677.95 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 728,510.14 98.201250 SC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 4,832.19 4,832.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -725,273.34 -725,273.34 98.281250 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -725,273.34 0.00 99.281250 FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 170,766.90 170,766.90 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.281250 5 GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -1,140.25 -1,140.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 376.47 376.47 98.281250 31283MB71 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 171,143.37 171,143.37 98.281250 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 171,143.37 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 00, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP $GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 723,677.95 723,677.95 98.291250 Page 23 e w oo MRLWN TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAWBASE BASE: USD . O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2020 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 90.291250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -4,832.19 -4,932.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.281250 31283HBTI 6.0004 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 725,273.34 725,273.34 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 725,273.34 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 992,640.54 992,640.54 98.281250 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -6,628.12 -6,620.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-ROV-1998 2,188.33 2,188.33 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 98.282250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 994,020.07 994,628.87 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 994,828.87 0.00 90.281250 PC GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -4,693,531.17 -4,693,531.17 99.093750 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 4,736,455.25 4,736,455.25 99.093750 SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SN ----------- 42,924.08 42,924.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIHCO 4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -37,307.41 -37,387.41 99.093750 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1999 0.00 0.00 99.093750 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO Page 24 UGSGuuuluu MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -4,730,918.58 -4,730,91B.58 99.093750 78442GRA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 -4,730,918.58 0.00 99.093750 FCC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 4,693,531.17 4,693,531.17 99.093751 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 -4,736,455.25 -4,736,455.25 99.093751 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- -42,924.08 -42,924.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 34,732.49 34,732.49 99.093751 78442GRA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.093751 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 4,728,263.66 4,728,263.66 99.093751 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 OD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 4,728,263.66 0.00 99.093751 PC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-FEB-1999 141,586.46 141,586.46 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 -141,293.33 -141,293.33 100.000000 PD ----------- 293.13 293.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-FEB-1999 141,506.46 141,586.46 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 141,586.46 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-FEB-1999 991,138.21 991,138.21 100.000000 3128DD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 -1,006,624.74 -1,006,624.74 100.000000 PD ----------- -15,486.53 -15,486.53 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP IGS-0476 01-FEB-1999 991,138.21 991,13B.21 100.000000 3120DD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 991,136.21 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 25 MELLUN 1MUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASL: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,823.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1998 -65,923.00 -65,823.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 65,994.99 65,894.99 100.000000 PDC ----------- 71.99 71.99 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 07,549.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-JAN-1999 -97,549.50 -87,549.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 97,645.26 87,645.26 100.000000 POD ----------- 95.76 95.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -07,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JAN-1999 87,549.60 87,549.60 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324► 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 -87,645.36 -87,645.36 100.000000 PD ----------- -95.76 -95.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JAN-1999 87,549.60 87,549.60 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 09/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 87,549.60 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -73,140.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-FEB-1999 73,140.00 73,140.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-FEB-1999 -73,220.00 -73,220.00 100.000000 PD ----------- -80.00 -00.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-FEB-1999 46,311.45 46,311.45 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 -46,246.32 -46,246.32 100.000000 PD ----------- 65.13 65.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-FEB-1999 46,311.45 46,311.45 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 46,311.45 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 17,473.32 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 -17,473.32 -17,473.32 100.000000 Page 26 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS`-J LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 17,473.32 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -103,882.75 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 103,882.75 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.0001 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 -105,603.31 - -105,603.31 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,720.56 -1,720.56 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -103,882.75 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 103,802.75 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 0.00 100.000000 PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -160,796.26 GN14A II POOL 4080088M O1-FEB-1999 160,796.26 160,796.26 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 -164,313.68 -164,313.68 100.000000 PD ----------- -3,517.42 -3,517.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 160,796.26 GNMA II POOL 1080088H O1-FEB-1999 -160,796.26 -160,796.26 100.000000 3622SOC20 6.875t 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 164,313.68 164,313.68 100.000000 PDC ----------- 3,517.42 3,517.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -160,792.15 GNMA II POOL tOB0088M 01-FEB-1999 160,792.15 160,792.15 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-FEB-1999 -164,309.48 -164,309.48 100.000000 PD ----------- -3,517.33 -3,517.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -160,792.15 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-FEB-1999 160,792.15 160,792.15 100.000000 36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 160,792.15 0.00 100.000000 PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS Page 27 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PINCO -1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 26-FEB-1999 1,378,440.00 1,378,440.00 100.000000 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 26-FEB-1999 -1,378,440.00 -1,378,440.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO -1,100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 1,089,412.50 1,089,412.50 100.000000 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 01-FEB-1999 -1,089,412.50 -1,089,412.50 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO -3,600.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN DISC 05-FEB-1999 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 100,000000 313588BM6 HAT 02/05/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,554,227.00 -3,554,227.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 27,814.25 0.000000 066365DN4 FLTG AT 05/21/2003 DO 05/11/98 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 16-FEB-1999 7,727.87 7,727.87 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 7,727.87 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 17-FEB-1999 13,869.72 13,869.72 0.000000 171200E80 FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 15-FEB-1999 13, 869.72 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 16-FEB-1999 82,012.77 82,012.77 0.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 82,012.77 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-FEB-1999 21,425.80 21,425.80 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 21,425.80 0.00 0.000000 Page 28 L-MLLwil l nuo l CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN ]ASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF Ill A6 25-FEB-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.5001 09/25/201B 25-JAN-1999 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 26-FEB-1999 5,283.13 5,283.13 0.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 5,283.13 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,239.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 17-FEB-1999 11,239.64 11,239.64 0.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 11,239.64 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 26-FEB-1999 21,560.00 21,560.00 0.000000 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 26-FEB-1999 21,560.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 10,587.50 10,587.50 0.000000 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 01-FEB-1999 10,587.50 0.00 0.000000 IT Dl-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 05-FEB-1999 45,773.00 45,773.00 0.000000 313588BM6 MAT 02/05/1999 05-FEB-1999 45,773.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-JAN-1999 -12,776.52 -12,776.52 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -12,776.52 Q.00 0.000000 ITC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 11 -1'F:P-J4lq 1, 183. 12 1,183.12 0.000000 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURA GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 1,183.12 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 103,882.75 GNMA II POOL #0080023 22-FEB-1999 11,105.85 11,105.85 0.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 11,105.05 0.00 0.000000 IT 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 160,792.15 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 22-FEB-1999 18,384.36 18,384.36 0.000000 36225CC20 6.8754 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 18,384.36 0.00 0.000000 IT 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 19-FEB-1999 55,600.20 55,600.20 0.000000 370425QV5 FLTG RT 09/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 18-FEB-1999 55,600.20 D.00 0.000000 IT 29-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400570 02-FEB-1999 13,572.60 13,572.60 0.000000 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/90 02-FEB-1999 13,572.60 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.DD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 400196 16-FBB-1999 166,250.00 166,250.00 0.000000 52517PJD4 6.650% 11/00/2000 DO 11/08/96 15-FEB-1999 166,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 16-FEB-1999 80,000.00 00,000.00 0.000000 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 15-FEB-1999 80,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 23-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 0.000000 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 26-NOV-1998 94,990.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO Page 30 OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1999 - 29-FEB-1999 TM1D0 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-FEB-1999 416,250.00 416,250.00 0.000000 718154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 15-FEB-1999 416,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-FEB-1999 218,125.00 278,125.00 0.000000 912810DE5 11.125% O9/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 15-FEB-1999 278,125.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O1-FEB-1999 265,625.00 265,625.00 0.000000 9128272G6 06.2501 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 31-JAN-1999 265,625.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 26-FEB-1999 -761.66 -761.66 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 26-FEB-1999 -761.66 O.DO 0.000000 CM AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM PUS INT ADJ 26-FEB-1999 -7.85 -7.85 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 26-FEB-1999 -7.85 0.00 0.000000 CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 378.71 378.71 0.000000 996085247 01-FEB-1999 370.71 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 3,091.10 3,091.10 0.000000 996085247 01-FEB-1999 3,091.10 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT O1-FEB-1999 10.73 10,73 0.000000 996087094 VAR AT DO O6/26/1997 01-FEB-1999 10.73 0.00 0.000000 IT O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 31 .auUt-Gun5UL1UA'1'EU POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FES-1999 TN100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ Page 32 i FAHR COMMITTEE MetlngO"` Toea"° 3/10ry5 3R493 AGENDA REPORT 10r 13 Mm Ca) ' 7 1.3 p /,} Orange County Sanitation Dis rid FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager SUBJECT: UTILITY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUDITING SERVICES (FAHR99-15) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Makesense, Inc., for utility and telecommunications auditing services; and 2) Approve such services on a contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) a not-to-exceed 50%fee for all recovered overcharges, and b) the equivalent of twelve (12) months savings for all implemented cost reduction strategies. SUMMARY The District has budgeted approximately $3.7 million in FY 98/99 for utility services that include telecommunications, water, gas and electric. The fees and charges associated with utility billings can be extremely complex. As a result, the District, like most organizations, is likely paying more than necessary for utility services as we are not fully aware of alternate fee structures, optional services, taxes, tariffs, etc., which could prove beneficial if implemented. In addition, utility company billing practices are fallible and these companies may invoice incorrectly due to various circumstances. Utility overcharges, resulting from both utility billing errors and less than ideal payment plans/structures, can be mitigated upon identification. Upon identification, many overcharged rates/fees can be recouped and re-structured resulting in refunds as well as future cost savings. In December 1998, the District solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Utility Billing Audit. Proposals received were reviewed and ranked by a Staff Committee based on the proposed scope of work and cost of services. Based upon the contents of each proposal and reference checks, the Committee unanimously agreed that Makesense, Inc. had the most thorough scope of work while being the lowest bidder. Staff recommends a PSA be awarded to Makesense, Inc. for utility and telecommunications auditing services. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Makesense, Inc. operates on a contingency fee basis. The proposed fees for services are: caE.ar,wm.,s ur.,,m.a aww.a ,Rvs Page 1 t • Recovery Fee: Makesense, Inc. will invoice OCSD for 50% of any overcharges returned to OCSD as a result of the audit. Upon OCSD's receipt of each recovery, Makesense, Inc. will invoice for 50% of the recovery. Although the recovery fee was deemed acceptable, the FAHR Committee directed staff to further negotiate this fee and attempt to reduce the percentage of recovery. Staff is currently in negotiations and as a result a not-to-exceed 50% recovery fee is recommended. • Cost Reduction Fee: Makesense, Inc. will invoice for the difference in monthly charges on each account where a cost reduction strategy was implemented based on recommendations. Cost reduction fees are based on one year's worth of identified utility savings. There is no net cost associated with the consultant services related to recovery of overcharges; there will be net revenue of an unknown amount. Cost reduction services will be paid back through reduced rates/fees in approximately twelve (12) months after the close of the contract. These reduced fees will result in net utility savings to the District beginning in month thirteen (13). BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This item has not been budgeted in the FY 98/99 budget. The project will run into FY 99/00 where, due to project scheduling, the vast majority of consultant fees (if any) will be paid. Because it is unknown if these services will result in a short-term net benefit versus a short-term cost, sufficient funds will be added to the General Manager's Professional Services line-item in FY 99/00 to cover any Cost Reduction Fees. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In September 1998, the General Manager sought guidance from Creative Power Management, a District power consultant, to assess whether utility billing audits were viable, cost-effective services. Creative Power Management indicated support for such services. In December 1998, six(6) RFP's were distributed to various national firms with expertise in utility billing auditing. Two proposals were received. These proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house Staff Committee. Based on ciomruesai s uwr wnaec Page 2 "a the proposed scope of work and price, staff unanimously agreed that Makesense, Inc. provided the best service at the most reasonable price. As the RFP placed limitations on the proposals' length, additional information was sought from Makesense, Inc. regarding precisely how the firm intended to bill for services and under what circumstances. The attached Letter of Clarification further details the proposed fees for services. ALTERNATIVES 1) Do not award PSA. 2) Do not authorize PSA and attempt to utilize in-house staff to conduct audit. This option is likely not cost-effective as in-house staff do not have the expertise of professional utility billing auditors. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable, ATTACHMENTS 1) Letter of Clarification GM c ro�xux®n5 ueiq wnaa Page 3 MAKESENSE, INC. 395 Rolling Hills Drive, Conroe, Texas 77304 phone: 409.856.2405 e fax 409.856.5199 internal: http:/twvw.makesense-inc.com • February 25, 1999 Greg Mathews, Asst. to the GM Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 9270M127 RE LETTEROF CLARIFICATION Greg: Per your request, the following aspects regarding the services we normally provide are explained more fully. Fee Structure Recovery Fee: MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice OCSD for 50% of any overcharges retumed to OCSD as a result of our audit Those recoveries will normally be a credit to the account on which the error occurred. If the account is closed, the recovery could be credited on any other existing account or returned as a check payable to OCSD. Upon OCSD's receipt of each recovery, MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice for 50%. In the event that a permanent cost reduction is associated with the recovery, MAKESENSE, INC. will include the cost reduction fee on the same invoice. If the cost reduction fee exceeds 50% of the recovery, the balance of the cost reduction fee will be invoiced at the dose of the audit where "tine close of the audit'is defined as the date of the Final Audit Report Cost Reduction Fee: MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice for the difference in monthly charges on each account where a cost reduction was implemented by, or at the recommendation of, MAKESENSE, INC. A cost reduction is a realized net lower monthly cost as the result of implementing a change in service type, service rate, service provider, service usage or any combination thereof. Cost reduction fees are 12 times the difference between the monthly costs before the audit and the costs after the audit, based either on the average usage experienced in the 12 months prior to implementation of the cost reduction or on actual monthly usage for the 12 months following implementation. However if a cost reduction opportunity is proposed by MAKESENSE, INC., and OCSD refuses to implement or allow MAKESENSE, INC. to implement the changes necessary to achieve the cost reduction, OCSD is under no obligation to pay the associated cost reduction fee, except that if the cost reduction is later implemented within the 12 months follovng the dose of the audit MAKESENSE, INC. will than be due the normal cost reduction fee as 'rf the change had been implemented when proposed. OCSD will not be obligated to implement any cost reductions that would cause undue project management burden on OCSD staff or adversely affect public or political harmony. 1 February 25, 1999 Continued Consulting MAKESENSE, INC. will provide, at no additional charge, limited consulting for all accounts previously audited for a period of 12 months beginning at the close of the audit Free services will be limited to those issues that can be addressed via phone, fax, or mail. Should there be any costs to secure information or documentation from your providers, OCSD will be advised of such costs and given the opportunity to end our involvement before incurring those costs. OCSD can expect to receive the following MAKESENSE, INC. services for free: • Follow-up on implemented cost reductions. • Explanation of billed items and charges. • Review of existing billing. • Review of alternate proposed services, rates, equipment, etc. • Correction of new errors in billing. The following more intensive services are available to OCSD at an hourly rate: • Assistance preparing Requests For Proposals(RFPs). • Assistance evaluating responses to RFPs. • Assistance with any specialized projects. BatRependrs, vA�l X4 z4z ` I' Roper Brow MWESENSE, Inc. BOARD OF DIRECTORS meadng wu I To W.of Dir. }2asg AGENDA REPORT Hem Number 11 um0er Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer SUBJECT: COOPERATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR THE GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 11-17-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Authorize execution of a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach providing for reimbursement by the City for two City projects to be constructed by the District in conjunction with the Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3; and (2) Authorize payment by the District to the City of Huntington Beach in an amount not to exceed $20,000 providing for AC pavement overlay in connection with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3. SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) is planning to award a contract for construction of the Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3, and the Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No .11-20, in June 1999. The City of Huntington Beach (City) has two projects that are scheduled for construction in the summer of 1999: (1) Street improvements on Goldenwest Street between Slater Avenue and Warner Avenue; and (2) Storm drain improvements in Goldenwest Street from the Wintersburg Channel to Norma Drive. The District and City desire to enter into a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement to minimize cost impacts and disruption to the public. The City will reimburse the District for their construction costs, estimated at $550,000, plus 5 percent for District construction management and administration, estimated at $27,500. The District will pay the City for the new asphaltic concrete (AC) overlay required within the Contract No. 11-17-3 pipe trench limits, estimated at $20,000. The District responsibilities under the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement will be funded from the project contingency. Staff recommends approval of the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY An additional $550,000 is requested for the construction of Contract No.11-17-3. An increase of$27,500 is also requested for the District Construction Staff. Reimbursement from the City in the amount of$577,500 will pay these estimated costs. The District payment in the amount of$20,000 for the City street improvements will come from the project contingency. See attached 'Budget Information Table." C4Vp &&Qm d Repro MBw t-174 AR W4N, J1 Rem.e, ermMe Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ' ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Item:Section 8, Page 7,Zone 11c-Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District and the City have construction projects potentially in conflict with each other in Goldenwest Street, in the summer of 1999. One City project is for street improvements on Goldenwest Street between Slater Avenue and Warner Avenue, estimated at $350,000. The other City project consists of storm drain improvements in Goldenwest Street from the Wintersburg Channel to Norma Drive, estimated at $200,000. The District and City desire to enter into a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement in an effort to minimize cost impacts and disruptions to the public. This agreement provides for bidding and constructing the City projects concurrently with the District project, under Contract No. 11-17-3. The elements of the Agreement include the following: District Obligations • Tying in existing City gravity sewer facilities (connected to the existing OCSD 15-inch Goldenwest Trunk) to the new Goldenwest Trunk, Contract No. 11-17-3 • Letting and administering a construction contract incorporating District and City projects • Providing construction inspection services for the District Sewer Projects • Reimbursing the City for an estimated 400 tons of AC pavement for the overlay required within the Contract No. 11-17-3 pipe trench limits. This overlay is part of the City street improvements and is the District responsibility estimated at $20,000 • Obtaining all permits required for construction of the District sewer projects City of Huntington Beach Obligations • Contracting and paying for design and construction support services necessary for the City Street Improvements and Storm Drain Project • Reimbursing the District for the actual cost of construction for the City projects as identified in the awarded schedule of prices, in addition to field change orders approved by the City, estimated at $550,000 • Reimbursing the District for Construction Management and Administration (not including inspection) in the amount of 5 percent of actual City construction costs, estimated at $27,500 • Providing finished plans and detailed specifications for the City projects to the District by the date indicated in the agreement • Abandonment of the City Mycroft Sewer Pumping Station which will no longer be necessary upon completion of the District sewer projects • Providing construction inspection services for the City projects • Obtaining all permits required for construction of the City projects •VN 1ON ends C R RegmUwnt Bo rW11.17.3 AR 32AN M R. . xi•A Page 2 When all the work is completed, a full accounting will be performed to determine final amounts owed under the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement. Invoices due to each party shall be paid within 45 days of billing. The other specific requirements contained in the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement include insurance, term, notices, dispute resolution, force majure, governing law, waiver and modification. Modification to the Agreement shall be in the form of a written amendment and signed by each party. Staff recommends approval of the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement. ALTERNATIVES The District has the option of providing no coordination for the proposed projects. District Staff does not recommend this alternative because of the inconvenience to the public. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. The Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table BDB:jak:jo G:WglabaMgenda Draft RepodWoht Boerds171A7�3 AR 32499.dot GU,OW gmEaQ RapftV nr�1117J M 34N tr+1 Rm.aP. eaaae Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement Contract No. 11-17-3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 5.000 $ 2.900 $ - $ 2,900 $ 2,900 $ - $ 2.900 $ 2 900 100% Design Staff $ 100 000 $ 210 455 $ - S 210,455 $ 210,455 $ - $ 210 455 $ 20 000 10% Consultant PSA $ 85,000 $ 83,000 $ - $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ - $ 83,000 $ 46.910 57% Construction Contract $ 2000000 $ 2432075 $ 550000 $ 2982075 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Construction other $ 8,160 $ 8160 $ - $ - S 0% Construction Staff $ 300,000 $ 575,085 $ 27,500 S 602,585 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 240000 $ 608,725 $ 20000 $ 588725 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% District Reimbursement to City- $ 20,000 $ 20 Reimbursement from City of Huntington Beach" $ $ 577,500) $ 577,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 2,730,000 1 $ 3.920,400 $ - $ 3,920,400 ": $ 296,355 $ - S 296.355 $ 69.810 2% District responsibility for a.c. street overlay within trench limits "Estimated City Construction costs plus 5% for District Management and Administration HA"Ale.,W-CM-17-3Wud,1 Inrn Ibl STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Cade Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on '-fi ., -� � . 1 stf was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on &"k i7 . 19/` . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ��day of �1 tz� Gv 19ia �j Penny M.. Kyi , Secre Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H:%W P.DTMADMINkWFOR MS\F27A