HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-03-24 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
March 17, 1999
,bane.l]i a1962 2411 NOTICE OF MEETING
telling aaanssi
20. Ba.e127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
°a 22728812 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
,tress sasses,:
CA
touna a leAvenue
Fountain Valley. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
in
92]oaaota
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
M,mber
Agencies
• The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County
clm., Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Maine.
Brae
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley :y
Fullerton v`
carean Grove Bb rd Sec r
Huntington Beech ry
ne
Le Habra
La Pelme
Lee Aleer"e° Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Newport Beech
Orange
Plecende
Bents Ana STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC
Seal Beech
Stanton COMMITTEE Re STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, March 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m.
Patin
Nile Perk
rorbe ones ORIENTATION FOR NEW DIRECTORS
TO THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND
ct.ecv a arnau. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 1, 1999 at 4:00 p.m.
SeMory Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND
Coate Mae CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 1, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.
Miewny D'y
OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
Water Districts TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE GWR SYSTEM - Tuesday, April 27, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 28, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
-To Pr et act the Pubac Hall and Me Emincrec nt Mrsugh Eseegence,In lbbetawetar 91'rtets-
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
April April 28, 1999
May May 26, 1999
June June 23, 1999
July *July 21, 1999
August August 25, 1999
September September 22, 1999
October October 27, 1999
November *November 17, 1999
December *December 15, 1999
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
April April 26, 2000
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 24, 1999— 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than
72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, If necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or
matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section `
54954.2(b).
0324/99
Page 2 of 7
6. Consideration of the following actions regarding Certification of the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System:
a. Verbal staff report
b. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the
Groundwater Replenishment System.
C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-01, Making Certain Findings Relative to
Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Program Environmental
Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System; adopting a
Statement of Overriding Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination.
d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-02, Certifying the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System has been completed
in compliance with CEOA.
7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
February 24, 1999 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/99 0228/99
Totals $4,821,397.93 $3,131,021.38
03/24/99
Page 3 of 7
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will
be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted
by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the
regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not
specifically removed from same, as follows:
10. Receive and file Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief from Claim Requirement filed
on behalf of former employee Michael Rozengurt (Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 806118), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
03/24/99
Page 4 of 7
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 24, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on February 24, 1999 and the Steering Committee/Executive
Management Committee Retreat Minutes for the meeting held on February 20,
1999 to be filed.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re March 3, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 3, 1999 to be filed.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
March 4, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES -
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
March 4, 1999 to be filed.
C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition
of$60,150, increasing the total contract amount to $35,689,903; and (2)Accept
Job No. P1-36-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc.
d. Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-40-3, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement with Pave West.
e. Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of
$25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $989,809;
and (2)Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing execution of the `
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with AirPol
Construction, Inc.
f. Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional funds for
Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total
project budget of$1.811,000.
g. Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc.
' 03/24/99
Page 5 of 7
h. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33-1, with Verve's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an addition of$250
increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and (2)Accept Beautification of
Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement with Verve's Plumbing, Inc.
1. (1) Ratify Change Order No.1 to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$262,274,
and 203 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,656,974; and
(2)Approve a budget amendment of$351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a
total project budget of$4,232,000.
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re March 10, 1999 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 10, 1999 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1999.
d. 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Makesense, Inc., for utility and
telecommunications auditing services; and 2)Approve such services on a
contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) a not-to-exceed 50%fee for all
recovered overcharges, and b)the equivalent of 12 months savings for all
implemented cost reduction strategies.
16. (1) Authorize execution of a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of
Huntington Beach providing for reimbursement by the City for two City projects to be
constructed by the District in conjunction with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3; and (2)Authorize payment by the District to the City
of Huntington Beach in an amount not to exceed $20,000 providing for AC pavement
overlay in connection with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract
No. 11-17-3.
0324/99
Page 6 of 7
17,
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes
final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures
of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development
Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)).
2. Confer with General Counsel re David Deese v. County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 786591 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)).
3. Confer with District's Negotiator re negotiations of new and pending
agreements with employee representatives (Government Code Section
54957.6).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
18. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any '
21. Adjournments
03/24/99
Page 7 of 7
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14
days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal
communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
HAcap.d a�dminOSAgendaW249 .draR.dm
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: March 24,1999 TIME: 7:00 p.m.
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ ✓ _
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................�� ✓ —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................. ✓ —
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS........................ ✓ —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... ✓ �L —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... a —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �_ —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... �L —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................
i// i —
(WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON...................
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... —
(MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... ✓ ✓ _
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... v- —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. Ll ✓ —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... CL CL� _
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. �/ —
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATfERSON................. a L —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ / —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................— _
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... —
(SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... / ✓ —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN..........................
.� —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... ✓ —
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER.......................
STAFF:
Anderson ✓
Ghirelli
Hod es
Kyle
Ludwin ✓
McIntyre ✓
Miles
Ooten
Peterman
Streed ✓
Tuchman ✓
OTHERS.-
Woodruff
Andrus
03/24/99
WadonW"kwp.MeletlMn%BSTIRECTOROlmdore Roll Call.dw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 7 - 2 Y - 9 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. s c.
NAME: (please print) IoroY /�Gui�✓+r�
HOME ADDRESS: I5 fi 4 L To PA
(number/street)
Wt5rf INgq( L , CA , 9u&3 - yztl
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: 5 L't 15 PA,.,$rQ C I.JA A,.)5Vyi 0 Cv" OF p, C ,
(self/name of organization)
Nadon`data?%wp.cfiMadmin\8ST0RMSWequmt to Speak.dw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES. /n
DATE: 3I AGENDA ITEM NO. U�
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) 4r6taen� T
HOME ADDRESS: 1000 la ZZ=9 S •—
(number/street) ,At
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: 7/'y'5--/ 3
REPRESENTING: Vtww 676c fr
(self/name of organization)
\YadonWatat\wp.dta)admiNBSTORMSR"uest to Speak.dw
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 2, AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) Reel> 4 . IG�D'�w
^ 'T`/
HOME ADDRESS: �OZO � f'� ILG4 ��7C TE RR/fC�
(number/street)
(city/zipde 240. ` /Z
ZVTELEPHONE: Q 4
REPRESENTING: )RAA)CW
W
(self/name of organization
\tradonN tal W,p.dta\admin�BSWORMSVRequeat to Spwk.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR
TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY
BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 3-2 AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
� "r
(city/zip cod
TELEPHONE:
REPRESEN ��
(self/name of organization)
WadonWeta7Nvp.dta�admin�BSXFORMSVRequm to Speek.doo
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
�-I I `o BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
PPtt rt
al- 0U,t A21�0
toa AGKII_APL .s pN,c W C61A+w(3W&—
C ors
✓er 2rf d640D
L�GC W G {L iGL 1NG
L ,✓,� rz ,Ei✓ o ,E
rJl� V, C 4-6-4e c
r I/
� L1 �P 5+ tJ,Svr fit... w5 OW-wc
AMA �GI C /' IMG,
O IIVIQ � � N$OY✓� C IS
H:WP.OTAWDMIN%W1F0RM ZJGN-IN FORK.
1
eMt111 r
O
\O
CITY OF ANAHEIM.CALIFORNIA
Planning Department
,OOMOte 1,�
March 23, 1999
Thomas M. Dawes, Project Manager
Orange County Water District/County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10500 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
RE: Comments on the Final Program EIR for the Groundwater Replenishment
System(GRS)
Dear Mr. Dawes:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above-referenced document. A number of issues
remain that are of concern to City staff. Staff requests that prior to finalizing the environmental
documentation,the following comments be addressed.
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Water Services Division
1. (Response L3-1) We are pleased that OCWD has agreed to conduct risk assessment
studies for Phase 1 of the project. It should be clarified that we request a Health Risk
Assessment, not just risk assessment studies. Also, it will be important to have Health
Risk Assessments conducted to consider possible health impacts during Phase 2 and 3 of
the project, particularly since some of this water may not be treated to the same degree as
Phase 1-water.
2. (Response L3-2) The quantity or quality of public outreach programs that OCWD has
conducted or plans to conduct in the future is not disputed. It is only requested that
OCWD verify the effectiveness of the programs. City staff believes that it is important
that our residents understand that this water was formerly sewer water and accept that the
treatment methods adequately purify it. Anaheim residents must accept the fact that
purified sewer water will be used as drinking water in the near future. It is recommended
that additional meetings be conducted with the public in layman's terms rather than in
scientific terminology to assure the decision-makers that affected customers fully
understand the project.
3. (Response L3-3) It appears that OCWD has concluded that the GWRS is the most cost-
effective alternative because the GWRS was only compared to the more expensive
alternatives.
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
P.O.Box 3222.Anaheim,California 92803 • (714)765-5139 • w .anaheim.net
Final Program EIR for Page 2
the Groundwater Replenishment System
Comments in the FEIR identified several alternatives that were considered in the DEIR
before deciding on the proposed project. The FEIR states that several of these
alternatives included such projects as seawater desalination, purchase of additional
imported supplies and constructing additional storage reservoirs in locations such as
Gypsum and Miso Canyons. The FEIR only commented briefly on the alternatives
identified in our letter dated January 6, 1999. These alternative projects should be
analyzed in more detail to ensure that the best alternative, or the best mix of alternatives,
is selected.
The report identified in the FEIR and entitled 'Water Supply Alternatives to Meet the
Future Needs of the Orange County Water District' estimates future demands considering
water conservation activities currently being implemented by water agencies. However,
both the DEIR and the FEIR fail to consider the significant amount of additional savings
potential that exists with full and aggressive implementation of all of the Best Management
Practices(BMPs).
4. (Response L34) Staff accepts OCWD's pledge that no river water will be displaced in
Phase 1 and that subsequent analyses will be conducted prior to Phase 3 to ensure
maximum use of river water. The Cities of Orange and Santa Ana also commented that
there appeared to be a lack of capacity in the spreading basins.
The response to this comment did not address the impact of the 50%blending
requirement. It remains unclear whether the blending requirement will result in costly
Project water(blended with costly SWP water) displacing low-cost river water, especially
as river flows increase over time due to upstream development.
The description of wintertime operations addresses a single storm event. It does not
identify how the facilities would be operated during a storm longer than 8 hours or during
long duration-storm events as can occur during El Nino conditions.
5. (Response L3-5) City staff fully agrees with your statement that 'water conservation is an
extremely important project'. The FEIR does not adequately address the fact that the
GWRS and water conservation should be done as a combined effort. If the County fully
and aggressively implemented the BMPs, significant reductions in future demands would
be realized. Since most of these water use efficiency programs cost less than $300 per
acre foot to implement, it would seem more cost effective to implement these water
supply enhancement programs,thus requiring a significantly reduced scope of project for
the GWRS. As an example,the potential savings for replacing all toilets in Orange
County with ultra-low-flush models are over 75,000 acre feet per year. This savings
potential could greatly reduce the amount of groundwater recharge necessary to
accommodate the projected increase of 180,000 acre feet of water per year by the year
2020.
6. (Response L3-6) As previously mentioned, since water conservation is a cost-effective
source of additional water supply and significant water savings potential still exists from
Final Program EIR for Page 3
the Groundwater Replenishment System
implementation of existing BMPs, those programs should be implemented in conjunction
with the GWRS to minimize the magnitude of the proposed scope of the GWRS project.
7. (Response L3-7) It appears that a much smaller project could be realized if OCWD only
considered projected increased water demands in their service area.
8. (Response L3-10) City staff still believes that the Santa Ana River Water Quality and
Health Effects Study is pertinent to the Groundwater Replenishment System, though we
concur that it does not apply to the project water quality.
9. (Response L3-13) In order to assure adherence to DHS standards for dilution, retention
time, and buffer zones, Anaheim staff requests that OCWD not apply for a"research and
demonstration" waiver for this project. -
10. (Response L3-14) City staff feels this is satisfactory as long as the engineering report is
completed and made available for use in the Health Risk Assessment.
11. (Response L3-15) It is requested that OCWD provide the City, at this time, with the
hydrogeological data to confirm the 12 month retention time and 2,000 foot buffer zone.
12. (Response L3-16) As long as OCWD will operate the spreading basins to maximize
utilization of low cost river water, the position regarding recharge operations is accepted.
However, the response that the FEIR is primarily for Phase 1 leads to the assumption that
another EIR will be prepared for Phases 2 and 3. The Draft and Final EIR did not state
they were for Phase 1 only. All potential environmental impacts of the project should be
considered prior to acceptance of the project.
13 (Response L3-17) As mentioned in response to L3-3,the referenced project alternatives
should be analyzed in more detail to ensure that the best alternative, or more importantly
the best mix of alternatives is selected. Staff accepts OCWD's assurance that additional
project alternatives, including additional points of injection, will be evaluated.
14. (Response L3-18) A thorough analysis to select the optimum disinfectant should be made.
The response indicates that only a cursory analysis was performed. It is important to
acknowledge and address the fact that disinfection byproducts may continue to form once
the project water is mixed in the aquifer.
15. (Response L3-19) City staff is pleased that increased treatment will be provided for
recharge water in Phase 1 of the project. The response references Figure 2-13 to
determine water quality during Phase 3 and since an updated Figure was not provided in
the FE1R, we must assume they are referencing Figure 2-13 from the DEIR. Clearly,the
water quality in Phase 3 is lower than in Phase 1. Any health risk assessment should
utilize the most conservative(i.e. lowest)water quality data.
16. (Response L3-20) Staff is pleased that RO will be used for all recharge water during
Phase 1. However, it is noted again that the response indicates that the DEIR focused on
Final Program EIR for Page 4
the Groundwater Replenishment System
Phase 1 and subsequent analyses will be conducted for later phases. It is therefore
assumed that another Environmental Impact Report will be necessary prior to
implementation of later phases.
17. (Response L2-22) The response partially addressed the question by stating that Kraemer
Basin will receive only project water and imported water while Anaheim Lake and NMer
Basin will receive river water and imported water. However, the response also states that
key physical conditions of the recharge operation at Kraemer Basin have not yet been
determined. Our comment suggested that OCWD should know the recharge conditions
before initiating the project. As evidenced by the number of comments by the cities of
Anaheim, Orange and Santa Ana regarding the recharge basin capacity and operations, the
document should provide a comprehensive analysis of the expected utilization of the
basins, project water, imported water and river water.
18. (Response 1.3-26) As previously mentioned, simply comparing the GWRS to other 'new'
sources of supply precludes consideration of alternatives that utilize existing sources of
supply or a combination of several existing alternatives that provide an overall minimum
total project cost or a reduction in the quantities of'new' supply needed from GWRS. It
is not adequate to only compare the GWRS costs to very expensive and/or politically
unattractive alternatives such as ocean desalination, construction of new storage
reservoirs, or new reclamation facilities.
19. (Response L3-30) The explanation regarding total nitrogen for Phase 1 of the project is
accepted. However, disinfection byproducts may form in the subsurface after project
water is mixed in the aquifer. Also, water quality for Phases 2 and 3 was not addressed in
the response. Per prior comments, staff believes that a subsequent EIR will be necessary
to address impacts of these later phases.
20. (Response L3-31) The detailed information provided by OCWD on water quality of
project water is appreciated. It was noted, however, that Revised Table 3-4 indicates
TOC level of 0.1 mg/L while Revised Figure 2-12 shows 0.3 mg/L. Also, staff believes
that it is important to include TTHMs and chlorinein the Gstof water-qualityparameters-
21. (Response L3-32) Figure 3-9 shows that three of Anahern's production wells are within
the 2,000 foot buffer zone. Mitigation measures should be included for all wells within the
buffer zone regardless of modeling results.
22. (Response L3-34) As previously mentioned, It is recommended that a Health Risk
Assessment be conducted, not just "risk assessment studies." We also recommend that the
health risk assessment be conducted by an independent third party.
23. (Response L3-45) City staff would like to commence discussions with OCWD regarding
opportunities to enhance the visual quality of the Kraemer Recharge Basin.
Final Program EIR for Page 5
the Groundwater Replenishment System
24. (Response L347) This comment seems to capture the Hill recommendation of our report,
although the comment does not specify how the health risk assessment will be conducted
or when. It is anticipated that OCWD will conduct the health risk assessment as implied
by their comment. This health risk assessment, however, should be conducted prior to
approval of the project, and certainly prior to the onset of the project.
25. (Response L348) Table 2 adds detail not present in the original report and is helpful.
The table does not, however, provide details on microbial infection in general, and for the
particular microbes mentioned in our previous review. We presume that this information
will be developed for the health risk assessment.
26. (Response L3-51) This post treatment monitoring system will be useful for some of the
microbes(e.g. coliforms), but the viral microbes will be more difficult to detect due to a
lack of readily available detection methods. How will this lack of methodology be
addressed? It is recommended that an upper bound limit be set on the likely
concentrations in the treated water.
27. (Response L3-52) The ability of the OCWD to monitor for these microbes is important.
The point of the original comment in our report, however, is that there is no mention of
how tap water concentrations will be determined. Is the monitoring system capable of
detecting regrowth during distribution? Or, is this considered outside the responsibility of
the OCWD? In addition, the report and the replies do not address how the OCWD
monitoring system will detect the full range of microbes for which there is public health
concern. For many of these microbes, the detection methods available to OCWD will not
be adequate. That is why the health risk assessment should be conducted before such
microbes begin to be released into the groundwater aquifer.
28. (Response L3-53) The presence of the monitoring system after treatment is encouraging.
The main issue that will remain is whether the system can detect most of the microbes of
interest, or at least detect suitable surrogates/indicators. We are encouraged by the
comment on the conduct of a health risk assessment, as this will help determine whether
accidents-such as seal leaks are really a-cause for conce= If they tum,out-to-produce-
small risks, then the inability of the monitoring system to detect all classes of microbes is
of less concern.
29. (Response L3-54) Again, this is an encouraging comment. The key issue will be the
detection of microbes in the water emerging from the treatment system, so sampling of
that water at regular intervals will be important, Further, it will be important to determine
how long microbial contamination might be present before detection, and then to
determine the resulting exposures and whether disease might occur prior to detection.
Still, the frequent tests of membrane integrity, etc., mentioned in the comments will help
allay much of this concern.
Final Program EIR for Page 6
the Groundwater Replenishment System
30. (Response L3-55) Again, this is an encouraging comment, although the term"intimate
understanding" is perhaps a bit too strong given the current state of ground water
modeling and the validation of such models. It is hoped that the model mentioned will
form the basis for the health risk assessment calculations. The key issue will be the degree
of validation of the model against at least limited testing in the aquifer. What still is not
clear is whether the model is capable of use in assessing efficacy of the proposed salt
water intrusion barrier.
31. (Response L3-57) The response does not adequately address the issue raised in our
review. The point of our review comment is that the project report does not perform a
systematic analysis of alternative sources of water for the three uses, demonstrating that
these three uses may best be met by reclaimed water. Whether the reclaimed water is safe
is not the primary issue here. The issue is whether this is the best use of the reclaimed
water relative to other water sources.
32. (Response L3-58) The OCWD is to be commended for committing to a health risk
assessment. The real issue will be how that assessment is conducted, what it will take into
account, etc. Our comments were directed towards the details of the assessment. The
response would have been more helpfirl if it had mentioned which of the recommendations
in our report would be satisfied by the proposed assessment, and the methods that would
be employed. We recognize, however,that these details may not be available at this time,
and urge the OCWD to consider peer review of the risk assessment protocol before
conducting it.
33. (Response L3-59) This comment will be alleviated following the Health Risk Assessment
mentioned. Until we am the actual design of the study, however, we cannot determine if
the specific scientific issues raised are being addressed.
Electrical Eneineedne Division
34. (Response L3-38) Mitigation Measure No. U-2(Table ES-1)is-noted; however,, it does
not fully address our original comment. The City of Anaheim has future Underground
Conversion Projects along Miraloma Avenue and La Palma Avenue. Please incorporate
the following mitigation measure into the Mitigation Monitoring Program:
Along Miraloma Avenue, two casings ten feet apart will be required under the new
pipeline; one for the 12 kV underground distribution circuits and one for the 69 kV
underground transmission circuits.
Should you wish to discuss any of the comments or if you have specific questions, please direct
them, as appropriate:
Final Program EIR for Page 7
the Groundwater Replenishment System
Public Utilities Department:
Water Services Division - John Hills, Environmental Services Manager at (714)765-4277
Electrical Engineering Division- Ed Murdock Sr. Electrical Engineer at (714) 765-4178
Questions outside of those referenced above may be directed to me at (714)765-5139,Ext. 5440.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comment on the document. Please
forward any subsequent public notices and/or environmental documentation regarding this project
to my attention at: City of Anaheim, Planning Department, Room 162, 200 S. Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805.
Sincerely,
1;ucy N. Yeager
Senior Planner
cc: Tom Wood, Deputy City Manager
Jack White, City Attorney
Ed Aghjayan,Public Utilities General Manager
Bob Cars, Public Utilities Assistant General Manager Water Services
Don Calkins, Water Engineering Manager
John Hills, Environmental Services Manager
Mahendra Garg, Principal Electrical Engineer
Ed Murdock, Senior Electrical Engineer
Richard-Mayer,Park Planner
grseir6.doc
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
March 24, 1999-7:00 P.M.
RE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is
appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
3. a. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re
appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows:
City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director
La Palma Paul F. Walker Kenneth Blake
Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith
b. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to
preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
H:\w ElaUgenda\Board Agendas\1999 Board Agendas\032499suppremenlal doc
It's best Checklist for an Orange CountV Sanitation District
to be prepared! EMERGENCY
provisional toilet
Living in California means living with the
reality that a major earthquake can hit at O 5-gallon plastic bucket with
any minute. Preparing for such an event a tight-fitting lid
will help you get safely through a disaster. O 2 boxes heavy-duty trash can liners
(8-10 gallon size) with ties A
We depend so much on household D 1 gallon liquid chlorine bleach
utilities for both comfort and security that or other toilet disinfectant
its hard to imagine living without them. PRlPAREDNESS ) �
O 2 boxes baking soda It
But, putting all comfort aside,there's one
household utility that offers more than O 2 large boxes heavy-duty trash can
simple comfort; it also protects your liners (30-gallon size) with ties
health and the environment around O 6-8 rolls toilet paper
you.That household utility is O Hand sanitizer to clean and disinfect
your sewer system. hands without water
O Feminine products What to do
O Paper towels
if your sewer
Knowing D Moist towelettes or baby wipes system becomes
what . . . if your sewer system
becomes damaged or inoperable will It's easy, damaged or
not only help you get through a so be prepared! inoperable
` Wt ephp
y,O FOR Sreq /N�. disasterearthquake, it
will also help
_. Ixss � Ni
r.7fls
Kamm protect your
health and the
W/1
Far additional information,contact !
environment. - the Orange County Sanitation District
communications Department at p14)aR&P011
visit our welasite at www.ocad.com
Importance of your household sewer system
In the event of a major disaster such as an earthquake,the sewer system in your area may become damaged
or inoperable. Damaged sewer systems are health hazards. It is important to get damaged septic tanks,cesspools,
pits and leaching systems into service as soon as possible. Trained personnel from local environmental regulatory ��..
agencies can help with these problems.
0
If your local sewer system becomes inoperable,there are proper procedures you can use to temporarily replace Y
your toilet and safely dispose of sewage while service is being restored. In our continuing effort to protect public `
health and the environment,the Orange County Sanitation District has prepared the following step-by-step plan
to assist you if an earthquake or any other disaster causes your local sewer system to fail. We recommend that
you keep these guidelines close at hand because you never know when you might need them.
Now to create a provisional toilet
1 If sewage lines are broken but toilet bowl is usable, place
a
a trash can liner inside the bowll and fallow the disinfectant . . ,and safely dispose of sewage
procedures below.
If the toilet is completely backed up, use a bucket with a trash After using the provisional toilet,you will need another
can liner and make a toilet seat out of two boards placed container to empty the contents for later disposal.
parallel to each other across the bucket. For greater comfort, The second container should be lined with a 30-gallon size
you can remove the seat from your household toilet and place trash can liner. As bags from the provisional toilet fill up,they
it on the bucket. should be placed in the second container for safe disposal.
2 Every time you use the provisional toilet, pour or sprinkle
a small amount of regular household disinfectant, such as NEVER deposit human waste or garbage on the open
chlorine bleach (DO NOT mix chlorine with other disinfectants ground.This will not only pollute the environment but it
as it can produce a dangerous chemical reaction), baking soda can also create a serious health hazard.
or laundry detergent to keep down odors and germs. If you have no other alternative for disposal, it is safe
to bury waste in trenches 24-30 inches deep.
Cover the container tightly when not in use
`{J and replace the trash can liner when waste
has accumulated. NEVER use a provisional
toilet that is not lined with a plastic bagl
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
Board Secretary
March 17, 1999
phone:
n141 962-2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
nulling edam.:
Ro. Be,8127 Subject: Board Letter
Po ,,tern valley.CA
9272E-8127
•01•t•dd"••' The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
10844 Ellie Avnce' on on any of the items, lease call me.
r iiatdln VaOay.CA Y P
92708-7018
Change in Board Meetino Time
Mau er At the last Board meeting you were asked for your preference in the start time of the
Apenan monthly Board meeting. Based on the results of that survey, the meetings will begin
e at 7 p.m. effective March 24.
cafe.
Ananein, New Active Board Members
Brea
eadna Park Supervisor Jim Silva has been appointed to serve on our Board, replacing Todd
Fbanhic, fry Spitzer as the Orange County Board of Supervisors representative. Jim previously
Fuaartan served two years on the Board representing from Huntington Beach. He was also a
Borden Brace member of the Building Committee, the predecessor of the PDC Committee.
Huntington erects 9
li Welcome back, Jim.
Le Habra
La Pelme s Lad Paul Walker, Alternate Director, has replaced Eva Miner-Bradford as the
eac
Newporrtt Beean representative for La Palma.
Orange
Place=
since Ana
Saar eaecn CEC Announces Heavy-duty Demonstration Program Funding
Shannon
ma"" The California EnergyCommission CEC recently announced it is making u to
villa Perk ( ) Y 9 P
yorha Linda $575,000 available in grant funds to cost-share up to 50 percent of the cost of
Count, or orange qualifying heavy-duty alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) demonstration projects. Referred
to as "Round 2" of the CEC's HD AFV Demonstration Program, up to $50,000 per
vehicle with a maximum of$150,000 per grant application is possible. This program
s.nftsr, Districts is intended to increase the numbers and use of HD/AFVs consistent with the CEC's
Costo Made strategic goals and plans. It works to reduce emissions and petroleum use while
Midway sty increasing alternative fuel usage in California's transportation sector. '
Water Districts
To be competitive, the HD/AFV engine system, vehicle, and/or component
Irme Rench technologies demonstrated should document engine performance, fuel economy,
energy efficiency, durability, reliability and consumer requirements of the emerging
AFV technologies.
End-user companies, non-profit organizations, or public agencies are eligible to apply
only in partnership with an original equipment manufacturer or technology developer.
Technology developers and original equipment manufacturers may apply only in
'ra Protect the Pattie Health and the Environment through Excellence 11 wastewater Systems'
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 2
March 17, 1999
partnership with private or public entity end-users. Example vehicle platforms include
shuttles, trash trucks, agricultural produce trucks, road maintenance vehicles,
package delivery trucks, transit and school buses or other long-haul, high-mileage
high usage applications (i.e. greater than 35,000 miles or 700 hours of operation
annually). A minimum of 50 percent cost share is required. At least 10 percent of
project costs must be a documented, verifiable cash contribution from a project team
member or a non-Commission source. Applicants are invited to submit proposals
before April 16, 1999.
To request an application packet for your city or agency, call Mike Trujillo at (916)
654-4566, McKinley Addy (916)657-0833, or Jerry Wiens (916) 654-4649. Ask for
the Heavy-duty AFV Demonstration Program application. The application packet is
also available on-line at htto://w .eneray.ca.aov/contracts/1999-02-23 heavy-
duty.htmi.
Petroleum Violation Escrow Account(PVEA) Fundina
Repeated from last week's CNGVC e-mail, preliminary reports out of the California
Department of Finance Offices estimate that the PVFA will fund an estimated $15M in
projects for 1999-2000. This funding, that comes with minimal use restrictions, must
be applied for through your local State Assemblyperson or Slate Senator. If you have
worthwhile projects that require additional funding, the PVFA may be a good source.
It is recommended that interested parties submit letters providing project details to
their local Representative or Senator immediately.
ARB Oka Carl Mover Program
At the first Air Resources Board (ARB) meeting featuring newly appointed ARB
Chairman Allan Lloyd, the Carl Moyer Program was given final approval for
implementation. The Moyer Program authorizes $25 million in incentives towards
emission reductions from heavy-duty diesel powered engines, including trucks, buses,
trains, ships and agricultural equipment. Matched with contributions from local air
districts, the amount available is actually$37.5 million. Staff will continue to monitor r
this program and consider the appropriateness of participating.
SCCWRP's 301h Anniversary
The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) is celebrating its
30th anniversary with a party at the new Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific. As a
founding member of this joint powers agency, OCSD has benefited tremendously over
the years from the ocean research conducted by SCCWRP on behalf of its member
agencies. The celebration will take place Sunday evening, May 2, between
Members of the OCSO Board
Page 3
March 17, 1999
7:30- 11:30 p.m. The aquarium will be closed to the general public that evening so
this is a great opportunity to tour the exhibits and share stories about SCCWRP's past
and future. A flyer announcing the event is attached. If you are interested in
attending, please complete the enclosed flyer(blue sheet) and return it to my
assistant, Jean Tappan, by April 14, or call her at 7141593-7101. The District will pay
for your admittance and will reimburse you for parking upon submittal of the parking
receipt.
Odor Complaints
We continue to receive complaints from our neighbors, and staff routinely evaluates
process operations to help solve the problem. However, there are instances when
our Collections crews go that extra mile to assist those most impacted by our
operations. As an example, please read the attached e-mail on Odor Problems
Across from Plant No. 2. It is indeed a pleasure to have such dedicated employees.
Biosolids Fact Sheet
I have attached a Biosolids Fact Sheet that was presented at a Kem County Board of
Supervisors' Science meeting that provides a good educational base on the biosolids
issues.
Earthquake Preparedness—What to Do If Your Sewer System Becomes
Damaged or Inoperable
Our Communications Department has created a new brochure on protecting health
and the environment in the event an earthquake damages the sewer system. The
County of Orange has volunteered to distribute this brochure along with others that
they have prepared to assist the public with emergency preparedness. If you would
like additional copies, please contact Michelle Tuchman at 7141593-7120.
Water Transfers: More than an Engineering Solution
The San Diego County Water Authority needs water for urban development, and the
Imperial Irrigation District (IID) would like to sell it to them. However, there are
numerous institutional and legal hurdles that must be overcome to reach this goal.
Between IID and San Diego are the water rights and concerns of the Coachella Valley
Water District and the Metropolitan Water District. Each of these agencies wants
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 4
March 17, 1999
assurances that their ratepayers will not unfairly bear the burden of the proposed
transfer. This issue is important to the District since it demonstrates the need for
"new"water sources in Southern California and supports the Groundwater
Replenishment System and other cost-effective reuse projects.
By way of brief background, San Diego needs to use Metropolitan's All-American
Canal to wheel the water from IID to San Diego. Metropolitan was concerned about
cost-shifting due to San Diego's new supplier, but it received a measure of
satisfaction after Governor Wilson signed legislation providing $235 million to line the
All-American Canal to help conserve water. Metropolitan is supporting the transfer,
but they remain concerned about IID's ability to conserve the water from its
agricultural users to meet San Diego's needs. This is important since Metropolitan
has lesser rights than IID to receive water from the Colorado River, and a lack of
conservation by IID could result in less water for Metropolitan.
To complicate the matter, the Federal Government may reduce water supplies to
California to meet the needs of the other Colorado River slates. California has been
averaging over 5.2 million-acre feel (MAF) of water per year from the mighty Colorado
River, well in excess of its 4.4 MAF annual allocation. Interior Secretary Babbit has
threatened to stop declaring surpluses on the river and force California to live within
its allocation. The State is working on the California Plan designed to meet this
requirement. Between the water rights of IID and Metropolitan is the Coachella Valley
Water District. It has asserted that under the Boulder Canyon Project Act, any water
not used by IID"exclusively' in its service area goes by right to them as the next in
line. Coachella has filed numerous objections to the transfer based on legal and
environmental impact concerns over the project. A booming economy, urban growth,
and a move compound all of these issues by some farmers towards crops that require
more water. The District's staff will continue to track developments regarding water
transfers, and note that these issues highlight the need for the Groundwater
Replenishment System project and other new sources of water.
Endangered Species and Endanaered Proiects
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) has proposed the Santa Ana ,
Sucker(catoslomus santaanae) for listing as a Threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Almost certainly, the District's proposed projects to
protect and/or move the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line (SARI) and the
Groundwater Replenishment System project would be subject to controls by the
USFBWS. Such measures could include restrictions on the design, timing, and
methodology of the project.
Once the proposed rule is finalized, the fish would receive federal protection in the
Santa Ana, San Gabriel and Los Angeles rivers drainage systems. The USF&WS has
determined that the Sucker populations have declined due to dams, water diversions,
Y
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 5
March 17, 1999
stream channelization and dredging, urban development (causing sedimentation,
turbidity, and pollution), intensive recreation, the introduction of competitors and
predators, and the isolation of populations (known as inbreeding depression).
Although the USF&WS did not designate critical habitat in the proposal, conservation
measure will still be required in the known range of the species, and the USF&WS
must work to develop a Recovery Plan for the fish. In the Santa Ana River, the
Sucker is known to live in the river from the Imperial Highway crossing upstream to
the City of Riverside, about 60% of its native range.
The USF&WS will provide"reasonable and prudent measures" that must be followed
by any project proponent requiring federal approval or oversight. The Mainstem
project along the Santa Ana River is designed to build the Seven Oaks Dam, the
raising of Prado Dam, and the continued channelizalion of the river in Orange County.
USF&WS specifically lists this project as one likely to impact the Sucker. They will
likely require some form of mitigation or participation in the Recovery Plan, or its
development, to compensate for the incidental take of the species. Note that the
District's Environmental Sciences Laboratory is providing fish and water quality testing
in a joint research project by United States Geological Survey, the Orange County
Water District, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works. The results of this study should help to develop the
Recovery Plan, draft reasonable and prudent conservation measures, and ultimately
lead to the removal of the Santa Ana Sucker from the ESA list as a Threatened
species.
California Watershed Legislation
The Orange County Council of Government's Executive Management Committee has
taken an interest in three watershed-related bills in the California Legislature. None of
these bills is known to have any direct or indirect impacts on the District's operations.
The first two bills, Senate Bill 216 (Solis) and Assembly Bill 1355(Havice), create the
San Gabriel Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the Eastern Los Angeles County
Rivers & Mountains Conservancy, respectively. The conservancies would be
empowered to acquire and manage lands within their jurisdiction in order to promote
their legislative goals. Both bills have similar goals including using the river area to
promote the development of open space, recreation, and watershed management.
The sponsors seek to develop a more integrated river system, instead of one that
primarily serves as flood control.
Senate Bill 754 (Hayden)would create the Los Angeles River Commission which
would work to develop a conservation and restoration plan for the Los Angeles River.
The plan must be designed to maximize the beneficial uses of the river. The
Commission would also serve in an advisory role to the State and local governments
on projects impacting the river, including commenting on all Environmental Impact
Reports for river related projects. These three bills would establish a "representative
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 6
March 17, 1999
for the river'which transcends current political boundaries; however, they do not
create new regulatory, taxation, or condemnation rights. The District's staff is
interested in these bills in as much as similar proposals in the Santa Ana River
Watershed may follow. The District's participation in the Santa Ana River Watershed
Group supports sustainable development along the river including water quality and
supply, flood control, open space and recreation, and the protection of endangered
and threatened species and their habitats. District's staff will follow the development
of these bills.
Inside Cal/EPA
The scientific debate over the land application of biosolids continues to occur
throughout the State of California and is not just restricted to Kern County. USEPA
believes that the extremely conservative nature of the federal biosolids regulation and
the best management practices employed by the California land appliers allows for
complete protection of public health and the environment. The Central Della Water
Agency's concems over biosolids land application were reported in "Inside Cal EPA"
in March of this year and are summarized below.
WRCB Biosolids Discharge Plan May Be Hazardous, Agencies Charge
Date: March 12, 1999
The water board's proposed waste discharge requirements (WDRs) for biosolids have
drawn the scrutiny of a Delta water provider and the California Farm Bureau (CFB),
which are concerned that an ongoing environmental study will not adequately
evaluate the potential threat to human health and the environment. The water
provider fears that the sewage sludge will be too expensive to treat, and the CFB
believes the material poses a threat to cops.
"The considerable uncertainty associated with the environmental and public health
impacts associated with the thousands of contaminants and pathogens present in
biosolids must be properly factored into the decision-making when designating areas
that are suitable for land application and when specifying the conditions under which
biosolids may be applied to those areas," according to the Central Delta Water
Agencys (CDWA) comments to the Water Resources Control Board.
The issue arose four years ago after the Central Valley regional water board adopted
general WDRs for the use of biosolids on agricultural land. A Califomia
Environmental Quality Act negative declaration was prepared to justify the WDRs, but
a petition by the CDWA and the CFB sent the matter up to the WRCB's purview; it
was decided that a full environmental impact report (EIR) was necessary. The board
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 7
March 17, 1999
ruled, however, that 50 sites could be grandfalhered under the regional board's
decision. An ensuing legal action resulted in a judge's order that the WRCB prepare
the biosolids regulations; a draft EIR partially funded by the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies is due May 21.
Publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) dispose of biosolids on farmland with little
expense while fanners enjoy the benefits of free organic material. Under U.S. EPA
regulations, biosolids disposal requires minimum treatment standards to protect
against pathogens and heavy metals deposition. Application standards also provide
protection for surface and groundwater. Nationwide, about 54% of the POTWs
surveyed dispose of biosolids through land application, said a wastewater engineer,
who added that the proposed WRCB rule will be "more stringent" than EPA's rule in
some areas.
"We are taking a cautious approach and plan to recommend a disposal method which
poses no threat to public health or environmental safety," said a WRCB source.
"We're taking a more cautious approach than the Facts,"
But the CDWA views the matter with a bit more skepticism. "Given the conceded
lack of an adequate scientific understanding of the full potential impacts from land
application ... together with substantial scientific evidence demonstrating the clear
potential for adverse impacts, the CDWA has been advocating and continues to
advocate the prohibition of the land application of biosolids to areas that unreasonably
and unnecessarily jeopardize the public and the environment," the agency wrote.
CDWA questions whether land application is the most "environmentally superior"
method of disposal, while noting that "the numerous gaps and shortcomings of ...
EPA's ... regulations leave the Gear potential for significant adverse impacts on the
environment."
Included in the alleged lack of information is EPA's admission in a Federal Register
notice that"dioxins, which may be present in sewage sludge, are not regulated not
because they are believed safe but because at the time EPA initially screened
pollutants for regulation it lacked data to evaluate dioxins for regulation." The CFB
questions the validity of EPA's biosolids classification, including the unknown long-
term consequences of field application, said a CFB source. "Our official policy is
caution," he said. "Some of our members love it, some hate it, but the bulk of them
are uncertain and don't use it." The cheap disposal costs for POTWs represents the
financial bottom line, but EPA has also pushed land applications as a means of
recycling waste, he said. 'The problem is, if you go through EPA's analyses and risk
assessment, there's not a lot of data." The WRCB's process will "promote a higher
Floor of awareness of this material."
CDWA says, "it should be obvious" that adequate steps be taken to protect
waterways from the contaminants in biosolids. Special attention should be focused to
prevent applications "which create an unreasonable and unnecessary risk of
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 8
March 17, 1999
contamination of ... surface and ground waters." The agency recommends that the
staging, storage and bulk application of biosolids be prohibited in areas with shallow
depth to groundwater and that are within 850 feet from any well or surface waters. In
addition, the EIR should thoroughly examine the potential impacts on water quality
from biosolids application in flood-prone areas. "Substantial evidence" supports the
argument that land application of biosolids may have a significant impact on
groundwater quality and the EIR "should thoroughly investigate, document and
discuss and analyze" how pollutants and pathogens migrate to groundwater and
travel horizontally to nearby wells.
In assessing the impacts of pathogens, CDWA notes that the potential harts to the
public and the environment "have simply not been analyzed or considered by EPA"
and that"to make matters worse, the evidence demonstrates that the pathogens
present in biosolids have the potential to regrow after the biosolids leave the
treatment plant." As a result, the risks to humans from cattle grazing on biosolids
sites "may be unacceptably and unreasonably high." In order to minimize or avoid
adverse environmental impacts, CDWA says the state should clearly set the
conditions— soil type, soil pH, and existing levels of contaminants and pathogens in
soil, climate— upon which it bases its findings of whether significant impacts will
occur.
Deficiencies in current regulations for biosolids application include lack of quality
assurance, lack of effective pathogen detection methods, lack of adequate tracking of
biosolids from POTWs to application sites and lack of any assumption of liability by
biosolids generators or applicators for any contamination and cleanup, the group
says.
U.S. EPA supports the WRCB's efforts and is part of a technical advisory group that
is fleshing out the issues, said the WRCB source. "They realize that site-specific
conditions can require a more cautious approach," he said.
Formal On-site Project Management Trainina
Approximately sixty District staff members are currently participating in a University of
California, Irvine, University Extension program. Coursework on an Introduction and
Overview of Project Management is provided in morning and afternoon sessions that
meet weekly for ten consecutive weeks. The course encompasses forty hours of
classroom work in addition to reading and homework assignments. Engineers,
managers, analysts and other staff with project management duties and
responsibilities are attending the Project Management class. Thus far, the class has
been well received. Dependent upon staffs final review of this introductory class, the
District may provide additional on-site opportunities for advanced coursework in
Members of the OCSD Board
Page 9
March 17, 1999
Project Management. Ultimately, some staff may choose or be encouraged to obtain
their official certification in Project Management by completing the entire nine-course
curriculum.
Source Control Y21K Update
The Source Control Division is involved in a variety of Y2K education and outreach
activities with industrial users of the District's facilities. A Y21K workshop will be
presented jointly by the District and the County of Orange on April 8, 1999. Speakers
will include representatives of the District; the Governor's Office of Emergency
Services; the Orange County Health Care Agency; an attorney to discuss federal,
state, and local enforcement issues; and a technical expert to discuss manufacturing
processes. A second workshop is planned for the fall to update the community on the
District's Y2K preparedness.
The Source Control Division identified 88 industrial pennittees as critical. As of
March 9, 1999, Source Control inspectors have personally contacted 111 industrial
permittees to discuss Y2K, including 30 of the critical industries.
Permittees are responding to the mass mailing sent in January 1999, with requests
for information on the District's Y2K plan. The feedback indicates a high degree of
awareness in the industrial community.
Attached is a copy of the April 8, 1999, workshop program and agenda.
Published Articles of Interest
I have attached articles on issues of importance to the District that have appeared in
various publications that may interest you.
If y/ou'would like/additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM.jt
w%"WANCMedG1AL£ANE $ro BOI.ee89N]WO ooc
Attachments
SCCWRP'S 3Oth ANNIVERSARY
Sunday, May 2, 1999t
Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific �~
7:30 - 11 :30 p.m.
$7 per person plus parking
r~
* Tour the Aquarium
Enjoy food and drink
* Share stories about SCCWRP's
past and futurey1
a * RSVP before April ,,�/Si ,AYe-Ar'
'?4 ;Pleaae ja& as as roe cel du& 30 geaaa 4 aem=d 4 tke
5mase,w eal P=a &"a d Vatar ,Reaeetaek ;Vujeat. We fC alao die
eoo»cbletl,w 4 arar fateat aegwa eu" (Figkt•98) at ae Aav#.
D9k£87904M lake tke 770 9aeewruy wad gd&w tke algae. to dawxtoaw
chow 1r"d arrd tke dfguanua+s exit: Ike o4pau'" ex[t"& &Ad to tke #a%& rg lot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RSVP (enclose payment and mail form before April 16)
Please list the names of everyone in your party so we can provide personalized name tags:
We will be attending the SCCWRP 30th Anniversary party:
Your phone: ( 1 —
Mail Form to: Debbie Hallock
SCCWRP Payment enclosed: #persons x $7 =
7171 Fenwick Lane
Westminster, CA 92683 Questions? call 714-894-2222 (Debbie)
v
a McIntyre, Donald
From: Cook, Doug
Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 10:08 AM
To: Torres, Ed;Anderson, Blake; McIntyre, Donald; Dolan, Robert;Tuchman, Michelle;Hodges,
Ed; Ludwin, David;Amordes, Nick;Winsor, Chuck; Heinz, Dave
Cc: Velasco,Marci lo; Reed, Brian; Blanda,Thomas
Subject: RE: Odor Problems Across from Plant no. 2
1 to would like to express my thanks, on behalf of Operations,to the staff involved in this effort. You know, how our
neighbors view us is important, after all,we work for them. While we cant wave a magic wand and disappear,we can
do,should do,and are doing, everything we can to minimize the impact we have on them, as best we can. Evidence for
this is pretty straight forward in the work Marco Polo Velasoo, Brian Reed,and Tom Blanda and his crew have done on
the issues below. The work they do representing this agency with the public is very important, and as we can see below,
is of a very high level of performance. Thanks again.
—Original Message—
From: Tones,Ed
Sant: Thursday,March N.1999 3:29 PM
To: Anderson,Blake;McIntyre,Donald;Oaten,Robert;Tuchman,Mkhelle;Hodges,Ed;I in,Oavid,Cook,Doug;Arhontes,Nick;
Winsor,Chuck;Heim.Dare
Cc: Vebsco,MemoPdo;Reed,Brun;Blanca,Tlwmas
Subject: Odor Problems Across from Place no.2
Plant no.2 over the past couple of months has received a large number of odor complaints from a group of residents
living at Jonespod and Cape May streets. After initial investigation staff determined that it was not related to the
treatment plant but rather to the sewer collection system. Staff within the O&M and GSA Departments have spent
considerable time and effort over the past several months working with the residents, modifying our gas Flaps that
were installed in the incoming lines and working with the City of Huntington Beach attempting to identify the problem,
unfortunately,with Tittle success. I would like to report to you that we believe that we have identified the source of
the problem and that the problem will be corrected.
Yesterday the City of Huntington Beach, at our request,smoke tested their sewer lines connected to the affected
residents. It appears that one of the residents who is an elderly woman did not regularly use her upstairs bathroom,
and as a result the water trap in her toilet was dry. The smoke test revealed this problem and it is our hope that with
regular use of her fixtures, any odors that may work its way back up the lines will be removed through her waste vent
pipe on her roof and will not enter the house. The second resident had a slightly more complicated issue in that he
had a broken waste vent pipe in his wall. This wall was adjacent to the intake of his house ventilation system and
therefore any odors coming up through the vent pipe were being distributed throughout the home. The resident is
taking steps to repair the broken line.
I would like to commend the O&M (Marco Polo Velasco and Brian Reed)and GSA(Tom Blanda and crew)staff for
their excellent work in persistently pursuing the problem and effectively working with the City of Huntington Beach
staff and the affected residents to solve this problem.
Ed Tortes
1
f
SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET
One of the most prevalent public misperceptions is that biosolids are raw human wastes. In actuality, biosolids are
a valuable resource. Biosolids have been extensively treated using physical,chemical,and biological processes to the
point where they are suitable for use as soil amendments and fertilizers. Another public misperception is that the
chemical makeup of biosolids is unknown;the reality is that blosolids are one of the most studied materials in existence.
What are Biosolids?
Biosolids is a relatively new term for a product of wastewater treatment that may be beneficially used as a sail
amendment and meets all regulations for such use. Biosolids are a subset of what Is commonly known as sewage
sludge.The terms sewage sludgeorwastewater solids refer to the solid material produced during waste vidwtreatment.
When the solids are treated and tested,they may meet the regulations required for recycling.Biosolids is a more precise
term to describe that primarily organic portion of the solids which meets federal and state regulations for beneficial use
by land application or other methods.
The word biosolids originated from within the wastewater treatment industry when members sought to give a name to
the clean, agriculturally viable product currently generated by modern wastewater treatment.Advances in technology
and regulation have led treatment plants to create a product so significantly improved over traditional wastewater solids
that the term for the new material was deemed appropriate.
Biosolids, a twist on the use of biological processing of wastewater solids,was suggested by Dr. Bruce Logan of the
University of Anzona. Water Environment Federation's(WFF)Executive Committee formally recognized the term in
1991and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(U.S. EPA)began using the word soon thereafter. "Biosolids'm
used by most federal and many state agencies today and the term now appears in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.
tenth edition.
How Are Biosolids Produced?
Virtually all the constituents of biosolids originate from the sewage which flows to municipal wastewater treatment
plants. Municipal sewer-system users include households, commercial businesses, and industry. After screens and
fitters remove larger items and grit from the sewage,the remaining solids are separated from the stream by a series
of physical, chemical, and biological processes.
In order to produce a clean effluent for discharge to water bodies. a variety of processes are employed to remove
contaminants and pollutants. Most treatment plants use multiple treatment stages, several of which duplicate natural
processes in rivers and streams.
Primary treatment removes solids via the settling of heavy materials and the skimming of floating materials.The solids
removed during primary treatment are called primary sludge. Secondary treatment removes biodegradable organic
material through a biological process where bacteria consume the organic material remaining in the wastewater. The
clean water and bacteria then go to settling tanks where the bacteria settle to the bottom as a stream called secondary
sludge, biological sludge, or waste activated sludge.
Biosolids are mainly composed of solids removed during the primary and secondary treatment processes which are
further processed to stabilize the material. Stabilization reduces odors, quantity, and pathogens. The typical
stabilization process used is anaerobic digestion. This is a process similar to human digestion where the solids are
mixed and heated at high temperatures for an extended period of time, often in excess of 15 days, In the absence of
oxygen and where bacteria consume much of the organic portion and produce methane gas and carbon dioxide.
Current Regulation and What the Kern County Ordinance Will Add t
The Unites States Environmental Protection Agency(U.S.EPA)published Standards forthe Use or DisposalofSewage
Sludge,Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Pert 503(commonly referred to as Part 503),in 1993. Part 503 is
a comprehensive,risk-based regulation that protects human health and the environment from pollutants of concern that
can be present In blosolids. The rule was subjected to an external"scientific peer review, and public notification and
hearings pnor to adoption.
The U.S. EPA regulates the final use of biosolids according to the class of pathogen reduction,the degree of vector
attraction reduction, and the concentration of regulated pollutants in the biosolids. To date there has been much
1
1p
confusion with respect to Class A versus Class B pathogen reduction. Part 503 requires Class B biosolids to be used
in combination with certain site restrictions to result in the samelevel of public health and environmental safety as Class
A biosolids.
The Kern County Ordinance 1) authorizes local permitting of all land application programs; 2)requires practices to
comply with Part 503 regulations and numerous land management practices. 3) implements a county-wide land
application information/dats base. and: a) includes an inspection and oversight program. The latter will allow the
County access to all sites using biosolids and provide a mechanism of enforcement for any program operating Outside
the parameters of the Ordinance.
Why Should the Public Care About Blosolids?
The public should be knowledgeable about the beneficial use of biosolids. In many cases,opposition to land application
sites has centered on regional issues,such as the shipment of city biosolids to rural locations.Aside from regionalism,
the most pervasive public concerns about biosolids land application appear to involve the release of trace elements to
soil and groundwater,and human pathogens released to sewers by households and other sources. Federal,state,and
local regulations based on sound science are the public's prime safeguard against potentially negative effects of
biosolids reuse.
Biosolids generally contain concentrations of metals greaterthan the concentrations in typical soil.Therefore,biosolids
applications usually increase the concentrations of metals in soils. Most trace elements are immobile since they bind
to the organic material found in biosolids, however, and tend to concentrate in the soil only as deep as biosolids are
incorporated into the soil.The National Research Council found that where biosolids have been added to soil according
to existing guidelines and regulations, consumers have reported no phytotomcity or accumulation of trace elements in
plants attributable to biosolids. If the agricultural uses of biosolids follow state and federal regulations, no adverse
effects should be expected or observed.
The second main concern about biosolids is the transmission of pathogens contained in wastewater to human beings
near biosolids land application sites. Blosolids contain the same pathogenic organisms found in the domestic waste
of the population and in food-related industries. The pathogens found in raw sewage have included bacteria such as
Salmonella, viruses such as Hepatitis A, and parasites such as tapeworms. Pathogen populations are significantly
reduced through wastewater treatment and biosolids production.
Except for the use of raw sewage or primary effluent on sewage farms in the late 19th century, there have been no
documented cases of infectious disease resulting from biosolids use in the United States.No adverse effects have been
reported resulting from ingestion of food plants grown in biosolids-amended soils. The National Research Council's
review of the Part 503 rules took issue with only one aspect ofthe regulations pertaining to the survival of tapeworms
in Class B biosolids applied to cattle grazing areas. The council concluded that U.S. EPA's Part 503 rule"appears to
be... adequate for the protection of the public from the transmission of waste associated pathogens"
What are the Benefits of Biosolids?
Biosolids can provide essential plant nutrients,water, and organic matter which can improve the physical condition of
soil and render it a more favorable environment to manage nutrients and increase water retention. Biosolids contain
all the elements essential for the growth of higher plants. Because nitrogen and phosphorus are the most abundant
major plant nutrients in biosolids, the material's agricultural use is almost exclusively as a supplemental source of
nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer.
Biosolids also contain all essential plant nutrients, with the possible exception of potassium, to satisfy most crop
requirements. As with the addition to soils of other organic materials, such as hay and animal manures,the addition
of organic matter accompanying successive biosolids additions improves the physical properties of soils.This,in turn,
exerts a positive influence on water penetration, porosity, bulk density, strength, and aggregate stability.
Sources
• California Water Environment Association. 1998. CWEA Manual of Good Practice for the Agricultural Land
Appication ofBiosi ids. Oakland, Ca.
• Water Environment Federation. 1997. WEF/U.S. EPA Biosolids Fact Sheer Project. Biosolids: A Short
Explanation and Discussion. Alexandria, Va.
2
MANUAL OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION
Biosolids generated in California have been recycled as a soil amendment on home gardens and agricultural
lands since the late 1920s. This recycling effort continued on a modest scale until the early 1970s when new
state and federal water quality laws mandated 1)a reduction in pollutants being discharged into sewers and
2) higher levels of wastewater treatment by publicly owned treatment works (POTWs).
Industrial source control programs effectively reduced the contaminant levels in sewer discharges and
caused a significant decline in biosolids metal concentrations. Figure 1-1 shows the decline in cadmium and
lead concentrations in biosolids from 1980 to 1996. Data are weighted averages from four large California
facilities. each of which produces more than 80 dry tons of biosolids per day. This trend is typical for most
POTWs which handle industrial discharges.
Flgure 1-1
HISTORICAL DECLINE IN CADMIUM AND LEAD CONCENTRATION IN BIOSOLIDS
Weighted Averages fmm Four Large(>80 dry Ions per day)California Facilities
100 Cd mg/kg dry weight) Pb(mgrkg dry weight) 900
Pb(Table I limn=640 mg/kg)90 800
Cd(Table 1 Limn=a5 mgtkg)
80
70D
J Lead(mg/kg)
70 ,� Cadmium(mg/kg)
600
isoD
i 50
4D0
40 CA(Table 3 Limit=39 mg4cg) 41
e,...Pb(Table3Umit-3100 300
30 a �(
gmLSfw^�.�tU• 4[4 $gxr;N •yrTi.;:
200
20
10 —
00
•
0 ._ .. 0
1980 1981 19a2 19B3 1994 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
i
POTWs improved wastewater treatment by upgrading and expanding treatment processes, thus, greatly
increasing the quantities of biosolids generated. Subsequently, POTWs and academia further investigated
and refined land application and other recycling practices to manage these increased quantities. This, in
turn, resulted in a greater scientific understanding of the safety and benefits of biosolids recycling and
increased the interest of POTWs in beneficially recycling biosolids.
SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #5 : TRACE METALS
WHAT ARE TRACE METALS?
Trace metals are part of the fundamental building blocks of the earth. Soils, water, and
bedrock naturally contain these elements in varying concentrations. They include metals
like arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead,mercury,molybdenum, nickel, selenium, and zinc.
Trace metals are present in throughout the environment including soils, food, humans,
animals, plants, and biosolids.
N DO BIOSOLIDS CONTAIN METALS?
Yes, biosolids contain trace concentrations of metals.
WHERE DO THESE METALS COME FROM AND HOW CAN THEY BE
CONTROLLED?
The trace metals found in biosolids come from both industrial and residential sources. In
the past, industry was a major contributor of trace metals. Controlling trace metals in
biosolids is founded on the adage that"an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Your local clear,water treatment plant has created an industrial pretreatment program to
protect the quality of biosolids and the discharge of treated wastewater. Over the past 15-
years concentrations of trace metals were significantly reduced in biosolids by requiring
certain industries to pre-treat their process wastewater prior to discharge to the sewer
system The local agency enforces the pretreatment program through random,
unannounced inspections and sampling. The result is that biosolids quality improved
dramatically so that it may be safely recycled.
Residential contributions originate primarily from common household products. Control
of residential contributions of trace metals to biosolids is accomplished largely through
public education and household hazardous waste collection programs.
DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT METALS IN BIOSOLIDS?
Trace metals in excessive concentrations in our environment or in biosolids are a concern
for the health of plants, animals, and humans. Even though trace metals are present, if
they occur in concentrations higher than a desirable range there is an increased risk of
negative impacts from the metals. -
Many trace metals belong to a group of metals that are so insoluble or strongly bound to
soil or plant roots that they do not move into edible plant parts regardless of the quantities
present in soil. Chromium, mercury,and lead are examples of this group.
WILL THE USE OF BIOSOLIDS CONTAMINATE MY LAND WITH TRACE
METALS?
Because trace metals contained in biosolids remain in the soil,their presence at elevated
levels was the focus of the earliest,most detailed research in the area of biosolids
beneficial use. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and many research scientists
_ throughout the country developed concentration standards for trace metals in biosolids to
For fuller information about biosolids-contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean wamr urr anent plant or
get in much with Charles Egigiw-Nichols,BioSource Concurring 1197 Timberg®e Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548.
BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #5 : TRACE METALS
irrespective of the metals source. If a fanner or home gardener desires even moderate
success under low pH conditions,they would need to at least add some lime to obtain
reasonable crop yields.This results in a self-regulating and protective mechanism.
The soil-plant barrier concept is founded in the bio-chemical link between cadmium and
zinc. "Unless the proper pH level and Cd:Zn ratio is maintained zinc plant toxicity will
first occur resulting in substantially reduced plant yields.Thus,zinc becomes a natural
factor which limits the cadmium risk to consumers of these crops. Either the grower
maintains a reasonable soil pH for crop production(which protects them from increased
crop and diet cadmium),or eventually,when soil pH drops enough to allow high
cadmium uptake and potential cadmium risk, zinc phyto-toxicity reduces crop yield and
hence reduces potential for consumption of cadmium-enriched crops."
Chaney, R. L. and J. A. Ryan. 1993. Heavy Metals and Toxic Organic Pollutants in
MS W-Composts: Research Results on Phytoavailability,Bioavailability,Fate, Etc. In H.
A.J. Hoitink,et al (eds.). Science and Engineering of Composting:Design,
Environmental, Microbiological, and Utilization Aspects. Ohio State University.
t
' Last revised 7.24.98
For further infotrwion about bio olids,ocrow the biomlids spokesperson N Your local clean water treamtmt plant or
ger in touch with Chula Egigian-Nichols.BioSourcc Consulting 1197 Timbugatc Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680.9549.
BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #6 : PATHOGENS
WHAT ARE PATHOGENS?
Pathogens are microorganisms that cause disease. Associated with sewage and biosolids,
y pathogens of importance include bacteria, viruses,protozoa,and helminths. In a non-
scientific context, pathogens are often called germs. They are very small organisms and
are invisible to the unaided human eye.
Bacteria are everywhere in our environment and life. Some bacteria are critically
important to beneficial activities,some bacteria are neutral to humans, while some
bacteria will cause human disease if a person is susceptible and comes in contact with a
sufficient dose of the bacteria.A well known bacterium is Salmonella found with
chickens. Viruses are distinctly different from other pathogens because they are unable to
reproduce outside the living cell they infect although they will remain vindent for a time.
Viruses are responsible for numerous human diseases including flu.Protozoa are
sometimes found in drinking water,raw or under cooked food(especially pork),or on
contaminated food preparation surfaces. Helminths are usually in the foam of tapeworms
and roundworms,organisms frequently found in dogs, cats,and rats.
WHERE DO PATHOGENS COME FROM?
Pathogens live in all healthy and ill humans, domestic animals, livestock,and wildlife,
essentially all warm-blooded mammals. The germs are cast off by mammals through
feces.Human feces are collected in sanitary sewers or septic tanks for disinfection and
destruction,most often at centralized sewage treatment plants. Other germs may enter the -
treatment plant, lakes,streams, or groundwater through urban stormwater runoff.
HOW ARE WE PROTECTED FROM PATHOGENS?
Pathogenic microorganisms generally do not survive well outside of the body of their
host. As a microscopic organism,their ideal environment matches that of the warm,
Nprotected, fluid inside of a mammal. Gera are vulnerable and will die when exposed to
disinfecting chemicals(e.g. acids or bleaches),heat, light, or dryness. Each germ has a
unique response and survival time to these hostile conditions.
ARE THERE PATHOGENS IN BIOSOLIDS?
Yes. Biosolids are a product of the wastewater treatment process. One of the primary
functions of wastewater treatment is to protect public health from potentially harmful
germs.Many pathogens are destroyed during the collection and biological treatment of
wastewater, and most of the remainder through the solids treatment process. It is
important to note that pathogens cannot multiply outside of living hosts. For example,the `
AIDS virus is transferred only through intimate body contact with transfer of body fluids
and the virus has never been found to survive the wastewater treatment process.
HOW ARE BIOSOLIDS TREATED TO KILL PATHOGENS?
The presence of pathogens in wastewater and the biosolids resulting from wastewater
treatment requires treatment of these solids to reduce any remaining pathogens to a safe
For fuller information about biosolids,contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water tremnent plant or
get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols,BmoSource Consulting, 11971runbergate Lane,Brea,CA 92921 (714)680-9548.
BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #6 : PATHOGENS
DOES BIOSOLIDS CONTAIN CYCLOSPORA, THE INTESTINAL
PARASITE FOUND RECENTLY ON FRESH FRUIT?
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cyclospom is a small
intestinal parasite transmitted by the fecal-oral route. Outbreaks in developing countries
appear to be associated with contaminated drinking water. Outbreaks in the United States
are evidently associated with imported, contaminated fresh fruit. It is possible, although
extremely unlikely, that biosolids contain cyclospora.
Regulations prevent direct application of Class B biosolids to fresh fruits and vegetables,
so in this case it is virtually certain that there could be no contamination. Class A
biosolids, which contains virtually no measurable harmful organisms, may be applied to
these types of crops. Because the biosolids are virtually free of germs it is expected that
no cyclospom would be in the biosolids.
Last revised 2.24-98
For funher information about biosolids.contact the biosolids spokesilctson at your local clean water uxuarnent plant or
get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols.BioSource Consulting, 1197 Timbefgare Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548.
BIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #15: GROUNDWATER
INFORMATION
CAN BIOSOLIDS APPLIED TO LAND CONTAMINATE
GROUNDWATER?
Biosolids present no greater threat to groundwater than animal manures or commercial
fertilizers, because biosolids are applied to land at rates that meet the fertilizer
requirements of the crops to be grown. Over many decades thousands of acres of crop
land have successfully received biosolids applications. in states where water quality
monitoring wells are required, the water quality from these wells has always shown that
when biosolids are used at agronomic rates following good agricultural practices,there is
no degradation of groundwater quality attributable to biosolids. Studies show that when
biosolids or fertilizer are properly applied and crops are harvested from the site, there is
no increase in nitrate concentrations in the groundwater.
El As with any agricultural product if applied incorrectly, the soluble constituents of
biosolids have the potential to impact groundwater.The primary concern for groundwater
quality associated with biosolids land application is with nitrates. Biosolids are normally
IN applied at an agronomic rate, which means that the crop receives only the amount of
nitrogen it can absorb. During the growing process,the crop takes up the nitrogen,thus
N removing the nitrogen from the site when the crop is harvested.Only if more than the
agronomic amount of biosolids is applied can there be excess nitrogen that eventually will
be converted to nitrates, which can migrate to the groundwater.
WILL THE METALS IN BIOSOLIDS POLLUTE THE GROUNDWATER?
No.Extensive research over many years has found that trace metals are strongly adsorbed
or held to the soil and organic matter added with biosolids and native to the soil. Except
under very acidic conditions(pH<5.5) metals are tightly bound and are neither mobile
for leaching to groundwater or soluble for uptake into plants.
WILL PATHOGENS END UP IN OUR GROUNDWATER?
No. Pathogens in biosolids are extremely unlikely to find their way into groundwater.
During biosolids treatment,the concentration of pathogens is significantly reduced and
bacterial levels are usually found to be less than those in manure. Researchers have found
that the smallest pathogen, viruses,are very strongly bound to biosolids and are not easily
released even after rainfall or irrigation.
I� WILL BIOSOLIDS POLLUTE THE GROUNDWATER WITH TRACE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND PESTICIDES?
No. Trace organic compounds are rarely found in biosolids prior to land application.
Recent studies show that these organic compounds are highly volatile and are not present
in biosolids or the soil long enough to be of concern for groundwater quality.
For further information about biosolids.contact the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water trcmnent plant or
get in touch with Charles Egigian-Nichols,BioSource Containing, 1197 Tunbergate lane,Brea,CA 92921 (714)680-9548.
SIOSOLIDS FACT SHEET #15: GROUNDWATER
INFORMATION
ARE MONITORING WELLS NEEDED AT APPLICATION SITES?
No. Research over the past 30-years including the use of lysimeters,shallow wells, and
deep wells, have found that biosolids poses little risk to groundwater quality. It is not
necessary to install wells as long as biosolids are applied at agronomic rates and the site is
farmed following normal best management practices.
HOW IS GROUNDWATER QUALITY PROTECTED FROM BIOSOLIDS?
Groundwater buffers protect groundwater from direct contamination by biosolids. By
applying at agronomic application rates and using biosolids with acceptable quality, the
groundwater under the application site is protected from becoming contaminated by
nitrate, pathogens, and trace metals. All wells provide a potential direct path to
groundwater, and have similar buffer requirements regardless of how they are used (e.g.,
for irrigation or domestic water supply). A well that has been abandoned may provide a
direct path to groundwater if it has a cracked or nonexistent well casing.
Last revised 7-24-96
For further information about biosolids.contsm the biosolids spokesperson at your local clean water trcaunem plant or
get in touch with Charles Egigher-Nichols BioSource Consulting, 1197 Timbergam Lane,Brea,CA 92821 (714)680-9548.
THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Technical Assistance Center
and
THE ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFIED
UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY
Y2K and Compliance
Legal and Technical Issues
Workshop
8:00.8:15 am Check In
8:15-8:30 am Introduction to Seminar (Christensen)
• Workshop Purpose and Structure
• Introduction to District and Source Control Priorities
8:30-9:00 am Embedded Systems (Winters)
9:00-9:30 Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Tanouye)
. State of California Update
9:30-9:45 am Break
9:45-10:45 am Technical and Legal Issues for the Manufacturing Community
• Manufacturing Process and Waste Management
• Legal Issues
• New USEPA enforcement guidelines
Local enforcement guidelines
• Model Y2K Plans
10:45-11:15 am Orange County Sanitation District Y2K Plan (Thompson)
11:15-11:45 am Orange County Health Care Agency Y2K Plan (Kim)
• Internal
• External
11:45-12:00 noon Questions & Answers
Orange County Sanitation District
Technical Assistance Center
6Pre-Registration Required
by March 31, 1999
and
Orange County
Seating is Limited
Certified Unified Program Agency
Priority will be given to
Orange County Industries
speakers include:
Ann Tanouye
Governor's Office of Presents:
Emergency Services 5
g y "Y2K" (Year 2000)
J. Craig Williams w What does it mean for your
Daehnke& Cruz a business?
d
Henry G. Kohlmann > Thursday
Arter& Hadden •� Q a y
w April 8, 1999
u e U Orange County Sanitation District
f Administration Building
U td m 8:00 AM-12:00 PM
U 2 (check-in 8:00-8:15)
0 N y
Program Registration Information Registration Form
Cost: FREE
Pre-Registration is Required
Seating is Limited to 90 Persons
Seating Is limited. Please register as soon as
possible Priority seating available for Orange
County Industries. Name and Title:
Come to the Workshop and learn: Send registration or call no later than March 31
1999.
Organization:
♦ What is the Y2K problem? Fill out the attached form and mall to
♦ Y2K related issues for Process Kelly Christensen
and Pretreatment Systems Orange County Sanitation District Address:
y 10844 Ellis Ave
Fountain Valley,CA 92708 City:
♦ Legal issues/EPA updates
or call(714)393-7430 to leave a menage Phone:
♦ Orange County Sanitation Zip Code:
District Y2K Plan Location and Directions:
Orange County Sanitation District Number of people attending:
♦ Orange County Health Care Administration Building Names of additional people attending:
Agency/Environmental Health 10944 Ellis Avenue
Y2K Plan Fountain Valley,CA 92709
Going South on the 405 freeway exit at Euclid, go
straight through signal,enter main gate.
For more information, please call:
Going Noah on the 405 freeway exit at Euclid, turn
Kelly Christensen right,immediately after underpass tom lea at signal,
Orange County Sanitation District enter mans gate a Type of Industry(please specify)
(714)593-7420
-or- g s
Steve Kim 11 1
Orange County -mail this portion only to:
Certified Unified Program Agency Kelly Christensen
(714)667-3709 t ; aces Orange County Sanitation District
are 10844 Ellis Ave
Fountain Valley,CA 92708
A H1UH WATER MARK'! Pagc I of t
ty.{{ Community news _Dmeage _ � ®,
�r}•��( "r*glftw.0 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH
A HIGH WATER MARK? HOMEPAGE
TODAY'S NEWS
FLOOD CONTROL: Rep. Ron Packard's role on a AUTO OTIVE
D.C. panel could help win funding for raising BUSINESS a FINANCE
CLASSIFIED
Prado Dam after years of delay. COLUMNS
COMMUNITY NEWS
March 3, 1999 •T
Community m
-come&caudrees;wnts
By TERI SFORZA :ElT«el°°
The Orange County Register •Rrewetoh
Growth
•Legal Une
Ifs the time of year again when county officials head to -°o.c Tees
Washington, D.C.,to paint a horrifying picture: •Pmm.a Gmmoimern
•Register In Education
Religion
Wild water crashing down the Santa Ana River,enveloping DUCATIeah m,
vast portions of north Orange County. Disneyland suddenly an EMPLOYMENT
underwater theme park. Homes filled to the brim like fish ENTERTAINMENT&
tanks. TRAVELFUN a GAMES
HEALTH a FITNESS
It's a picture that's been painted in the capital for years in LIBERTY ONLINELIVING&SHOPPING
mostly futile attempts to secure federal money to raise the POLITICS&
height of Prado Dam,which holds back the river at the county GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE
line. But for the first time,local water officials have a friend in SCIENCE&
high Paces.l TECHNOLOGY
6•• SERVICES a
PROMOTIONS
Rep. Ron Packard,R-Oceanside—whose district includes SPORTS
&RECREATION
WEATHparts of south county—is chairman of the House energy and
water Appropriations subcommittee,which will weigh whether
the Prado Dam project deserves money.
"That,I think, is going to be very advantageous," said Ken
Smith,deputy director and chief engineer of the county Public
Facilities and Resources Department.
Packard's spokesman stressed that no decisions have been
made yet about what will be funded,or at what level.
"But Mr. Packard is very aware of that situation" and will
listen to Orange County's concerns,Adam Schwartz said. t
Improvements to Prado are part of the$1.3 billion Santa Ana
River Mainstem Project,authorized by Congress in 1986.
About$600 million has been spent on lining the river and
building the Seven Oaks Dam near Redlands.But the 75-mile
improvement project is still not fully funded.
Plans call for raising Prado Dam's embankment about 28 feet,
httpJ/www.ocregister.conVcommunity/prado003w.shtznl 3/3/99
A HIGH WA I EX MAHK7 rage 1 of G
in hopes of insulating Orange County from killer floods that
are forecast to occur once every 190 years.
The improvements planned for Prado would cost about$470
million. Officials hope to get at least$5 million from the
federal government in this budget cycle.
You can trace the project back to the Great Flood of 1938,a
disaster that killed 45 people,left 2,000 homeless,and
inflicted $14 million in damage. It happened March 3, when
the Santa Ana River breached its banks after five days of
heavy rain.
In terms of human suffering, it was the worst weather disaster
to hit the county this century,historians say.It led the federal
government to build Pmdo Dam on the Santa Ana River near
Corona in 1941, an action that has probably saved many lives.
The most recent serious flood in the Santa Ana River flood
plain occurred March 1, 1983, when the worst in a series of El
Nino-fed storms brought torrential rains that inundated more
than 900 homes in Huntington Beach. The damage toll that
winter hit$25 million,including heavy damage to three
municipal piers.
In 1987,the county examined its flood-control network and
determined that the channels need at least$1.2 billion in
improvements. The Board of Supervisors flirted with the idea
of floating bonds and creating special taxing districts to pay for
the overhaul, but settled on a scaled-back approach.
et newspaper In Omnge Cminty, oma
' 'Reg'isf�ei''
CopyrgM 198e TM Olanpe Cowry RepuM
Phase sentl rommem4lo oveeular86nk.heeeom.wm
httpJ/www.omgister.com/community/prado003w.shtml 3/3/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times ,r Sd �7YI?q �
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
President Clinton recommended
$1.s million for the orange
County Water and Orange
County Sanitation districts'
Groundwater Replenishment
System m the budget he pro-
posed Feb.1.The proposed pmt-
fication system is expected to
cost between $350 million and
$400 mihiou and be completed by
2020.
Environmental reviews are
underway MA if approved the
system could be eligible for cer-
tification next month, water dis-
trict spokesman Ron Wildermuth
said. The system takes treated
waste water that is normally re-
leased into the ocean and purifies
it beyond drinking-water stand-
ards.The water is then introduced
into the cdmty's underwater ba-
sin,reducing the basin's salt level
and improving overall water
quality,Wddermuth said Officials
expect the system to bring N
enough water to serve 200A00
fam0ia fmagar.
—Elsa LTiu, )l41%3-]1l1
WEDNDIDAA',JANUARY Ee. Illr
Tax.Take, -.
The frequency with which"lots Jut year
THE WAMTIf -J0U:RRL: approved retaining,increasing or imposing.
a to based on how the lax revenues Witte
la bD used:
....S..._.....__..._.........�...___CA._EAS
E_DYI.NCALIFORNIAUID 73%
ECONOMIC FOCUS
.
Genual UrO S6
Municipalities Seek Ways """"""S'ements 28
Capital Improvements SO IC@% TZA
Out of Tighter Tax Trap "'k`/Fl1 fe"lon 4b �21
'Sown:Peimata AnatbGt;. ' .
By slu lu Mum propositlon 218 expanded to all titles a wide margin. Together, the two meal- 'Cities are more focused on redevelop
sr.nurr"'•re•yrrie w.u.xw,xas.......... and counties a mandate requiring a IWO- sure$allowed the canary to use general meal and new sales-tax generation."
In the 21 years since the adoption of (Irinis vote to impose or Increase "site- salts-lax motley for the special purpose For his flat[,John Slablback,national
Proposition 17, local govemmenls and ciai" lazes, designated for a particular or fundingtransportaliml. director of UY Kenneth Leventhal Real
anti-lax activists haveisshopped playing purpose,and a simple majority to pass or "It's either awful, wonderful or Estate Group's public-private develop
a fiscal game of cal and mouse. Increase general taxes.Moreover.218 re- merely entertaining depending on how ment consulting practice, says that
Proposition 13 slashed property-tax quired any lases implemented since Jail- you look at It,"says Mr.Misczynski.(Tile "Proposition 218 has not come up*explic-
tales to 1%of assessed value and made it nary, 1005 without a vole go back to the county fendnl off a legal challenge of the illy as a motivation for[he 25 such deals
virtually Impossible to ever false them. electorate(by Iasi November). measures by local taxpayer and political In Cxiirorria—worth nearly $e billion—
prompting cities and counties Income rip According to the survey by Los Ange- groups, It wan as far as the stale trial his unit has put together since 1006.
with a creative pastiche of fees, assess- les-based Kosmonl,tin nearly 200 city and Supreme Court,which In August let stand In all, lea says, (he Los Angeles-based
merits and funding plans to slay afloat. county elections last year,voters agreed lower court rulings In favor of Ilse practice has done 60 public-prlva[e deals
And when a particular slimtafy would to keep or increase existing taxes or take county.) worth about SB billion.
cinch on, the anti-taxers—led by such on new ones about 16% of the [line. In Proposition 218 also has made local 'Still,San Leandro City Manager Jahn
kTuups is lla flowed Jarvis Taxpayers 1!M7,final figure was 78%of the nearly 150 government move aggressive In parsu- Jennanis Indicates that these days.
Assalallon Ohannl for Prapoxlllun ITSing ecuno liodevelupmenl deals. Mr.
co-au(Imr)and[lie California Taxpayers I'ler(I0115%rIfVCYMI,IIIe$l0f WIIICII AlI1gI11 Kusmun( asserts. Officials are striking [here's evelopr pressure to lac this oco-
Asmdntion—would respond Willi yet an- approval of existing tuxes. up more parinerzhips Willi private devel- androis investing$7ent ili tact. ug its
other ballut Initiative aimed at choking 'Prupwiliun 218 Is severely curtailhlg opersorofferi^gulher incentives to bring andro is investing ST million through ILL
ulf(he latest revenue s[remn. the ablllly of titles to raise revenues for in new businesses—usually retail—that redevelopment agency to help the owner
Now. a suncy—sclieduled to be re- services." says lorry Kosnant. Intel- Will generate income for city and county of Eayfalr Mall renovate and expand it.
Eventually,leased next week—Indicates Ihal the dent of Lite JIM that bears his name. coffers.Indeed.It's compounding one of Improvements
s will ants
estimates.onal
Ilia
anll-lax eats have the municipal mice on Even worse for cities and counties, propusition 17's consequences—art illcen- Improvmntnu annually
mean un revenue.
We tan In trying to avoid the latest Gov.Gray Davis has Indicated he will— (ive ror local governments to focus on m. That.lie
annuatly In sales-tax w revenue.
mousetrap: PropPsetou 218. Dubbed the at least fur noW—follow the example of tail dtve[opmtnl, as sales taxes are making
he adds,still $9 a long the
toward
Might to Vole on Taxes Act by Its span- his predecessor.'Pell Wilson, and con- among tlm easier revenue sources to[all. unI v totip for me 5down0lea city lost
%ors and adopted by Callrmnia voters in [tittle redirecting more Ilan$]billion an- The downside la this is that there may be sullen voters struck down a bminuas-Il-
1986.Proposition 218 made it tougher for nually I^property taxes Iron local gov- duo many retell establishments for an tense lax hiocase last year.
hical govemmenls to raise or levy taxes. enintn[s to Schools. area to support. Ilockard ,says his city
has limit mayorof
assessments and flraperly-related fees. All tills has forted some local govern- Mr. Kosmanl's survey Identifies mu- Les A centiv,says his city has ereoffer
ments to be more resourceful.Dealt Mis- ulci aillles Thal have Jane 10 or more rig t^ecalvas to manufacturers rater
Since the mcasare ink effect. the uynskl, director or the Caliromla Ice- I uolnretailers,whidwfferartas Less tto-
likelihool that voters would approve a public-private deals—^lost of past
cal reds- nuriiitit stability.
y
search Burson, who has been tracking velopmentprojeciamle titpasscatemder nut LA, may be Ihd exception.
lax has dropped ant-IIdN, according to Prolasillon 218-rclaltd court cases, or fiscal year:Alemnbro,Coroua.Culver Atlrlatl Ikinlia,a nsrarch fellow at the
Kusmont L Associates Ine.'s annual sun points to Santa Clara County's effort 10 City, Garden Grove, Lancaster, Lang
vey of the business taxes and other costs gel around the special-lazes vote. Beach, Us Angeles, Ontario, Pomona, San of Calmbasad Public Policy lnsn-
In 190 cities and unincorporated areas. fly the required majority vote.Santa Riverside County, San Francisco, San stud at reinforces
nf roes "ta. says the Kosmonl
Clam County voters approved a general Ldalldro,Vallejo and Ventura. shady cities
'most
"tic ped for wisdom l
balf-cent soles-tax Increase. A separate -cities have become so handcuffed I^ revrealnuea are
strapped forty to" base
ballot proposal gave voters (Ira OPPortu- tea way they tail generate local taxes to planning
era d zoning
most lions on base
,,try to vole on whether the new revenue raise revenue for services,they hove be.
Plmndng and zoning doci$IaLL an their
cash value In the municipal treasury,
should be usedfor T1,11 as apt of proved y cone development ays Mr. Offering rather (hall na such rplmnieral judg-
liarta[ion projects.Thal was approved by more concessions," says Me ICosmonL un.n[s.%"nuahro of lift."
Kern weighs solids data Page 1 of 2
I
For a good tune, click here.
local news TrVl hrrstielb Cilifominn
Kern weighs solids data
Filed: Febnrary 22, 1999
By STEVEN MAYER
Californian staff writer
e-mail: smarerfa�bakercld.com
County supervisors asked for the latest scientific information regarding
the agricultural use of treated sewage sludge, and they got it Monday—
in shovelfuls.
With terms such as "frequency distributions," "mineralization
coefficients" and "anaerobic digestion" being casually tossed around,
supervisors listened and asked questions as scientists representing both
proponents and opponents of sludge argued their respective cases.
Kern County farmer and biosolids proponent Bill Tracy summed up the
order of the day when he told the board, "Your job today is to separate
biosolids from B.S."
As more than 100 farmers, scientists and other interested people watched
and listened from the audience, sludge opponents began the scientific
word duel by calling in Dave Bouldin, a soil chemist from Cornell
University.
Bouldin is the co-author of"Cause for Caution," a research study that
outlines the dangers of heavy metals, organic chemicals and biological
pathogens present in biosolids.
"I think we all can agree that we need to protect soil production, water
resources and consumer confidence," Bouldin said. 'But what is
acceptable data?"
Bouldin criticized the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations
governing the use of sewage sludge on crops. He said the "503
Regulations" attempt to apply a single standard to "all soils, all climates,
all crops and all sludge."
Proponents of biosolids had their own lineup of heavy-hitters Monday,
including University of Arizona microbiologist Chuck Gerba.
http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1292405325.asp 2/24/99
Kent weighs solids data Page 2 of 2
"In our study, viruses and salmonella were not detected in soils within 24
to 48 hours after application," Gerba testified.
There also is no credible evidence that harmful organisms in sludge leach
down to underground water sources, even after five years of land
application, Gerba added.
The use of sludge biosolids imported from sewage treatment plants in
Southern California has become a divisive issue among farmers—and
city dwellers— in Kern County.
Kern's close proximity to sewage facilities in Los Angeles, Orange,
Ventura and Santa Barbara counties makes this region an attractive
destination for millions of tons of sludge generated each year in those
areas.
Monday's meeting was the latest step in the county's attempt to craft an
ordinance that will govern the use of the controversial human and
industrial waste byproduct.
But the local effort has stretched well into its second year as farmers,
local citizens and government officials continue to struggle with
conflicting scientific information about the benefits and dangers of sludge
use.
After four hours of listening to more information Monday, there was no
indication from supervisors they had reached a turning point.
The county will use the information gathered Monday to develop a draft
of a permanent ordinance, said Kern County Resource Management
Agency director David Price.
The next meeting of the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee will be
March 25 at the county's public services building on M Street.
0 ® O
Wa D ktoby Mmw
a
C.MgM 1WTha9ak,nWtC so,no IE.HMe Wab4 ,Va
Aafo,I,W Preis C"wd,bi nadce I Prh v Paliw Swt,m l
http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1292405325.asp 2/24/99
AV Press:Kern County Sludge Page 1 of 4
it Sludge battle rages
M.Xo rsr
Jump lines This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press February 23, 1999.
M
NM By MICHAEL BITTON
Pine��
The VaRev Prvst Valley Vall Press Staff Writer
BAKERSFIELD -Kern Countys Board of Supervisors will have to decide
which camp of scientists it trusts when it decides whether to ban the use of
sewage sludge as fertilizer on agricultural land.
Scientists in support of the use of sludge told the board Monday they've
Nina never heard of one documented case where sludge,used according to federal
Newsroom EPA guidelines, has harmed the environment or made anyone sick.
LAW football More scientists, retained by growers opposed to the use of human waste on
Nobs`'pass cropland, said more research is needed before anyone can responsibly deem
Qlatuan the practice safe.
Poouvoaee
Sowial reports
AV Courthouse; Each side got an hour to present its side of the story,followed by half-hour
Edwards/8elin rebuttals. Public comment on sludge has been common at past board
Palmdale airoon meetings, but Mondays gathering was dedicated to scientific testimony.
School survey
Six ith David Price, director of the Kern County Resource Management Agency,
Starr tenon said the board has until January 2000 to enact a new ordinance regarding the
Weather use of biosolids in the county.
1"9 Review
Ads When a proposed ordinance is ready, it will go through a public hearing
Classified index process before final approval, Price said.
Announcements
Choice Etrcmmters Experts opposed to the use of sludge included David R. Bouldin, professor
Empin f emeritus from Cornell Universitys Waste Management Institute in Ithaca,
Farm. 'ante•oe1s N.Y.; and Aaron B. Margolin, an associate professor of microbiology at the
Financial University of New Hampshire.
Obituary notices
Personal They spoke on behalf of the Kern Food Growers Against Sludge, a group of
Real estate sales IS farmers, which includes members from the Antelope Valley.
Rentals
Placing a
iing ads narion Bouldin, who said he has 20 years of experience studying sludge, said ,
lC asked supporters and opponents alike want to protect soil productivity and water
Remil display resources, and at the same time maintain consumer confidence.
Do 1're
The controversy of using sludge,or"biosolids," comes down to the
Directories Auto Dealers associated risks,Bouldin said.
Rome Sind
Local Web sites He said he finds existing research too narrow to determine whether sludge
has a detrimental effect on crops. Some data exists regarding corn,beans and
Past fssum alfalfa, he said, but little more is known. That data shows potential damage
Suodew
http://www.avpress.com/n/tusty3.hts 2/24/99
AV Press: Kern County Sludge Page 2 of 4
Monday to crops when sludge contains too much zinc and nitrogen, he said.
Tuesday
Wednesday "In my opinion, only more research will resolve this controversy," Bouldin
Thum said.
Friday
Sanrrday Margolin, testifying live from New Hampshire via a teleconference call, also
Search spoke of the risks of using sludge in agricultural areas.
Classified ads
Mach Butters He said there is a big difference between a calculated risk, or a decision
News Paees based on data, and a perceived risk, or a decision based on emotion.
'9&'98 review
lethawk stories
Valley Press into "When you start telling people thew food may or may not have come in
contact with human feces, that it may or may not have contained pathogens,
The Valley Press that will be perceived negatively," Margolin said. "People are looking for
About avpress.com more of a guarantee."
avoress.com FAO
About the Pacer
p ct us Three experts who said spreading sludge on farmland is safe were introduced
Jobs with us by lames F. Stahl, assistant general manager of Los Angeles County's
Subscribine Sanitation Districts. L.A. County's Sanitation Districts, the city of Los
Super Coups of Ay Angeles and Orange County truck about 80,000 tons of sewage sludge to
Top of this paec Kern County, Stahl said.
-- - -Y, Chuck Gerba, a professor of microbiology and environmental science at the
p The Wst+ University of Arizona's College of Agriculture, said biosolids have been
}
we to sue recycled near Tucson, in Pima County, for the past 10 years without a• o Y
desen! problem. The material was spread on cotton fields, and the effect was
immediate and positive, Gerba said.
Heavy metals haven't been a problem in Pima County's sludge fields because
there is little if any industrial waste in the county's sewer system, Gerba said.
Pathogens haven't been a problem because they can't survive in the hot desert
climate.
"They'd rather be in your colon than out there," he told the board. "It's a
harsh environment."
Gerba said during five years of searching for viruses, he hasn't found any in
Pima County's fields where biosolids are used.
"We have been unable to find any evidence of problems," Gerba said. "We've
tried our damnedest." `
Rufus L. Chaney, a research agronomist with the Environmental Chemistry
Lab at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center USDA, said, 'There are so
many safety factors I'm embarrassed to admit them," Chaney said. "There are
so many, we could be sued for being too careful."
Chaney said with the quality of biosolids presently available, there is no
reason to be concerned about using sludge on cropland, because most of the
metals and minerals are removed in a treatment process.
http://www.avpress.conVn/tusty3.hts 2/24/99
AV Press: Kern County Sludge Page 3 of 4
Alan B. Rubin, a senior scientist from the EPA's Office of Science and
Technology, also spoke in favor of using biosofids on farm land.
He said the EPA began to shape rules regarding biosolids, known as the 503
Regulations, in 1984. By 1993, the rules were published.
When supervisors asked Rubin if the 503 rules could be applied universally
to all 50 states, he said yes.
Rubin said when the rules were being drawn up, 350 organic chemicals were
targeted. Eighty percent of them have not been detected in sludge, and of the
70 that were,40 were deemed of human origin. That leaves 30 to watch out
for, he said.
"I truly believe the 503 rule protects human health," Ruben said. "We have
never received a documented and or peer-reviewed health case attributed to
the use of biosolids."
Rubin urged supervisors not to ban the use of biosolids on Kern County land.
"We have data to show it's not only safe when used appropriately;it makes
sense,"Rubin said.
But the use of sludge on cropland hasn't made sense in other California
counties. Among the counties that have banned the spreading of sewage
sludge are Stanislaus, San Joaquin and Sutter, opponents said. Risks to land,
air, water, human and animal health were reasons for the bans, as was the
possible loss of confidence in agricultural products from those areas.
But Buttonwillow,rancher Bill Tracy said he's not afraid of biosolids. He's
been having them applied to his land at the Buttonwillow Land and Cattle
Co. for the past four years.
" We don't use it as a nutrient, but apply it to ground the Indians didn't even
want," Tracy said. "In the past 30 years we've tried every type of snake oil to
get the ground to produce. This worked."
Tracy said his family shared the same concerns as the biosolids opponents
about five years ago.
t
"We investigated it fully," he said. "We educated ourselves."
Tracy urged supervisors to separate biosolids from B.S., and allow the use of
biosolids as fertilizer on crops that aren't for human consumption.
Tuesday news page
News pa
Valley Press home page
http://www.avpress.com/rx/tusty3.hts 2124/99
City to buy land used for biosolids Page 1 of 4
Tappan, Jean
From: Anderson, Blake
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:04 PM
To: EMT
Subject: FW; City to buy land used for biosolids (http://www.bakemfield.com/top/i--12928398
Don at. al.
I had the impression from some of our consultants up in KC that there was going to be a deal between LA City
and Bakersfield that would allow biosolids and reclaimed water disposal to exist side-by-side on this property
and that a peace agreement was underway. Well............ This news piece says just the opposite.
Blake
----Original Message-----
From: Michael Turnipseed Irnailto:m.t=ipsecd@cwix.coml
Sent:Thursday. February 18, 1999 6:17 AM
To: Steckler,Steve; Stahl,Jim: Rubin, Alan:O'Delte, Bob;Mike Moom: Kcamey, Ray:Hill, Penny; Gerba. Chuck:
Ron Bnzweiler;Baroldi, Layne: Anderson, Blake
Subject: City to buy land used for biosolids(http://www.bakenFiield.mMtop/i-12928398
• • . • ��� try me
VON '-' . 0)
`�" afully searchable dlwitory
news Mir Alakrralidt;lCalilomian -hem.
City to buy land used for
biosolids
Filed: February 17, 1999
By MARC BENJAMIN
Californian staff writer
e-mail: mbeniamin@bakersfield.com
The city of Bakersfield's pending purchase of 4,700 5ee
acres near Interstate 5 and Highway 119 will deprive rent
the city of Los Angeles of a dumping site for its jpaPhidR
biosolids.
The $8.5 million deal, between the city and Valley Communities
Inc. of Bakersfield, may close escrow as early as this week, city
officials say.
The property is south and west of Interstate 5 and Highway 119.
2/19/99
City to buy land used for biosolids Page 2 of 4
'We really don't want somebody else's problem," said Raul
Rojas, Bakersfield's public works director, referring to Los
Angeles transporting its biosolids to the same property.
The city will honor the contract between Valley Communities and
Los Angeles which expires in September, but has no plans to
extend the agreement.
To accept Los Angeles biosolids—heat-treated human and
industrial waste products—would require action by the
Bakersfield City Council and members of city staff say council
members have indicated no interest in striking such a deal.
"The purchase will allow us to control our costs and control our
own destiny because we have to have a place to dump our
effluent," Rojas said.
Gregory Klimko, Bakersfield's finance director, said the deal
makes sense for the city, which can recoup money paid for the
property within about 20 years. The city currently pays $27 per
acre foot—about $275,000 per year—to Valley Communities to
use the effluent (treated sewage water).
By acquiring the property, the city can lease the property for
farming non-edible crops, such as cotton, alfalfa and barley.
It's the same process used for treated sewer water comingfrom
the other city sewer plant in southeast Bakersfield. Klimko
estimates the city can earn $225,000 by leasing land for farming
and save $275,000 it pays for water to be piped to the sewer
farm.
The water is piped from the sewer plant at Gosford Road and Taft
Highway, about nine miles away, said Gene Bogart, Bakersfield's
water resources manager.
"it has been the policy of the city to take care of its own material
locally. We haven't accepted anything from the outside, Bogart
said.
The change in property ownership will force Los Angeles to find a ,
new home for its biosolids, but Kern County still could be the
disposal location.
Raymond Kearney, head of regulatory affairs for the Los Angeles
Bureau of Sanitation, said Los Angeles also sends biosolids to
San Joaquin Composting's facility near Lost Hills and to
Riverside County.
2119/99
City to buy land used for biosolids Page 3 of 4
Judy Wilson, director of the Los Angeles County Bureau of
Sanitation, said the agency has spoken with two other Kern
County firms that already have permits for biosolids application
on their properties and a third firm in Riverside County.
"We always continue to look at other solutions," Wilson said. "We
want to have a diverse number of contractors and you need a
variety of options because of weather conditions ... if we can't get
to Kern County over the Grapevine then we can go to Riverside
and vice versa."
But any new property acquired for biosolids operations may take
some time to establish. Kern County has placed a moratorium on
permitting additional biosolids applications until a new ordinance
is approved.
David Price, Kern County's resource management agency
director, said a new ordinance is several months away from being
considered.
About 25,000 acres in Kern County have been fertilized with
biosolids, said Steve McCalley, Kern County Environmental
Health Department director.
Steve Stockton of Responsible Biosolids Management in Santa
Barbara said the loss of the Highway 119 property will not affect
Southern California agencies' ability to transport and apply
biosolids.
Stockton, who was raised in a Kern County farming family, said
the biosolids produced in Orange and Los Angeles counties are
among the cleanest available. Stockton's company also ships
biosolids from Oxnard's city sewage plant on property the city
owns near Lost Hills.
"What's funny is we operated out there for the better part of four
years before anybody realized we were there," Stockton said of
his firm's biosolids applications for Oxnard. "Now, we find
ourselves in a fight just to save our lives."
But, he maintains western Kern County is one of the better areas ,
for biosolids application.
"On the west side we have the kind of agriculture that can really
benefit from it and bad soil that needs to be remediated," he said.
2/19/99
City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 1 of 3
Tappan, Jean
From: Anderson, Blake— - -- - - - - ---
Sent: Monday, March 15, 1999 9:44 AM
To: EMT
Subject: FW: City sues to enforce sewer land buy (http://www.bakemfield.wmAop/i--12908508
This is the property that is currently utilized by Responsible Biosolids Management (RBM)to handle a portion
of LA City's biosolids. We understand, from Judy Wilson, that she believes that the City of Bakersfield IS
prepared to enter into a long tens relationship with Los Angeles(including LA subsequently buying the land
from Bakersfield and then providing perpetual access to Bakersfield to dispose of its effluent) after
Bakersfield buys the land. This is contrary to the Bakersfield Californian's news accounts that Bakersfield
intends to NOT extend the RBM/LA City use of the property beyond the existing October 1999 contract.
The one thing I've learned about Kern County is there's always at least two versions of every story that we
hear.
Blake
---Original Mcssage—
From: Michael Tumipseed limilto:rn.tumipseed(et.cwis.wml
Sent: Saturday.March 13. 1999 8:13 AM
To:Jim Willett:Tracy'
Bill:Tacked. Gene:Stockton,Steve:Stahl.Jim:Sanden. Blake:Rubin.Alan:O'Deue,Bob:
Mike Marrc:Kearnev,Rav:Pcnnv Hill:Gcrbi. Chuck: Ron Enz. ilm Robert Dowdv:Baroldi. Layne: Anderson.
Blake
Subject: City sues to enforce s vcr land buy(btip://nvvw.bakcrsficld.wm/top/i--12908509
Ea5 yruo=ys
_ rn _ J Kill
m Co.mry.
11e111 1:44W,,sbrlt,C'dformm -h ..
City sues to enforce sewer
land buy
Filed: March 12, 1999
By MICHAEL S. GREEN
Californian staff writer
et ail: mcime@Oakersf'mld.com r
The city of Bakersfield filed suit Friday against a Kern County firm
for allegedly reneging on an $8.5 million deal to purchase waste-
disposal property at Interstate 5 and Taft Highway.
City Attorney Bart Thiltgen said a hearing is scheduled Monday
on whether the city should be granted a temporary restraining
order barring Valley Communities Inc. from backing out of its
3/16/99
City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 2 of 3
January contract to sell 4,700 acres of land to the city. Treated
sewage from Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 on Ashe Road is
piped eight miles west to the sewer farm, where the "biosolids"
are incorporated into the soil.
The Bakersfield City Council voted 7-0 Thursday night in a
special closed session to sue VCI unless it complied with the
contract terms by noon Friday. The suit was filed Friday
afternoon when the company did not respond, Thiltgen said.
A March 4 letter from VCI President James Trigueiro said the
company had received an "unsolicited proposal"to buy the land
for"a purchase price significantly greater than that contained in
the city of Bakersfield offer."
The city views the "offer" as a binding contract, Thiltgen said, and
is claiming anticipatory breach of contract, negligence and
conspiracy among other causes of action.
Trigueiro and VCI's attorney could not be reached Friday for
comment.
Thiltgen said the city asked VCI who made the higher bid but the
company failed to respond. A Wednesday meeting between the
parties failed to resolve the dispute.
One possibility is Responsible Biosolids Management, which
delivers Los Angeles biosolids to the same property. One
condition of the city's deal was that RBM's contract not be
renewed in September.
The city of Los Angeles did not ask RBM to make a bid, Los
Angeles sanitation director Judy Wilson told The Californian.
Bakersfield city officials questioned her about the new proposal,
too.
"I would sure like to see it in continued use for biosolids, but we
are not in any position to acquire real property,"Wilson said,
adding she wouldn't be surprised if RBM made VCI an offer.
"They told me they were concerned about losing the site and that
they would take steps, but I wasn't sure they were in a position to
pay for it."
RBM officials could not be reached for comment Friday.
In addition to the temporary restraining order, the city of
Bakersfield is seeking a permanent injunction and court order to
force VCI to comply with the contract. The lawsuit also will be
amended to seek punitive damages from the bidder once that
3/16199
City sues to enforce sewer land buy Page 3 of 3
entity's identity is revealed, Thiltgen said.
® A O
w.c a kmrep no,.re
C pyfli*N>IM.1M Bsk Md LafEemien I E.H Me
rlsseceletl Preis CowrieM NMi I PrNaw Pjg c WermM
3/16/99
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 1 of 6
News �;� Slte Index - ao
■:•IA'II.^ !�,II STATE & LOCAL HELP✓
c IICY
nrre
®' SOUTHERN CALIFORNU510RSOURCE:"
Monday, March 15, 1999
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says
. Health: Fetuses and young children in farm areas are at highest
risk, research suggests, with intelligence, motor skills and
personalities affected.
By MARLA CONE, Times Environmental Writer
children exposed to pesticides in the womb or at an
__;early age may suffer permanent brain defects that
could change their lives by altering their behavior and their
ability to do everything from drawing a picture to catching a
ADVERTISEMENT ball, according to new scientific research.
Widely used pest-killing chemicals, in amounts routinely
found in the environment in farm areas, seem to be
capable of skewing thyroid hormones, which control how
the brain of a fetus or young child develops, according to a
study published today.
Scientists say the study and other recent research support
an emerging theory that pesticides may exact a toll on the
intelligence, motor skills and personalities of infants,
toddlers and preschoolers.
"Data suggest that we may be raising a generation of
children with learning disabilities and hyper-aggression,"
said Wayne Porter, a University of Wisconsin professor of
zoology and environmental toxicology.
Porter's study, published today in the journal Toxicology
and Industrial Health, shows that a common mix of
insecticide, herbicide and fertilizer found in drinking water
altered the thyroid hormones of young mice. It also
changed their aggressiveness--measured by attacks on
other mice—and suppressed their immune systems.
Although a study of mice alone is not overly compelling, the
theory is bolstered by recent research on human beings.
In tests in the state of Sonora, Mexico, scientists found
striking differences in hand-eye coordination and other
mental and physical skills when comparing Yaqui Indian
preschoolers in an agrarian region with those in adjacent
foothills where no pesticides are used.
Four- and 5-year-olds living in the farm valley had trouble
performing a variety of simple motor skills—drawing stick
http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaaOO1 U7edl3f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=l 3/15/99
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 2 of 6 ;
figures, catching a 12-inch ball from almost four yards
away and a tennis ball from more than a yard away, and
dropping raisins into a bottle cap from a distance of six
inches.
They also had poorer memory skills and stamina, were
more prone to physical aggression and angry outbursts,
and were less sociable and creative while playing. Farm
and household pest-killers are widely used there, and high
levels of multiple pesticides have been found in the cord
blood of newborns and the breast milk of mothers in the
area.
Mother study, in rural western Minnesota, found increased
birth defects in children conceived during the spring
growing season.
Most of the new research detects problems in agricultural
communities—places found not just in rural regions but also
in more urbanized areas, including Southern California. No
one knows yet what it might mean for people who consume
small traces of the chemicals in their food. Earlier this
month, Consumers Union reported that many fruits and
vegetables contain concentrations of pesticides that may
be unhealthful for children.
The new hormone studies add to a growing body of
research from around the world suggesting that dozens of
commonly used pesticides and other chemicals mimic the
hormones that control sexual and neurological
development.
Called endocrine disruption, this is arguably the most
controversial environmental issue of the past decade.
From alligators in Florida to polar bears in the Arctic, wild
animals in pollution hot spots have been feminized by
hormone-disrupting chemicals that imitate estrogen or
block testosterone, scientists say.
But the impact on human beings—who generally are
exposed to much lower levels of pollution—is more
controversial and uncertain.
In addition to the possible neurological effects, some
researchers theorize that the hormone disrupters could be
reducing men's sperm counts or increasing diseases of the
reproductive system.
Pesticide company representatives—and some toxicologists
and other scientists—remain skeptical that commonly found
levels of pesticides can alter human thyroid and sex
hormones.
"I'm kind of dubious that low-level exposures to chemicals
are raising all kinds of havoc with the endocrine system,"
said John McCarthy, vice president of a group representing
pesticide manufacturers, the American Crop Protection
Assn- "The human system has so many protective
mechanisms, and our bodies are bombarded with all kinds
http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 3 of 6
of things."
Still, he said, the industry is highly concerned about the
findings suggesting neurological damage, and would like to
see a comprehensive review to evaluate all existing studies
and figure out what they collectively show.
"We ought to be taking a very hard look at it," McCarthy
said. 'There's almost a study a week of one type or
another, and it's hard to see how it all fits together. We
have to take some time to say, 'OK, what does this all
mean? Is this something that should require some abrupt
change [in pesticides] or fine-tuning or more research?"'
No one knows how many pesticides out of 77,000 used in
the United States might alter sex or thyroid hormones.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires tests
that screen pesticides for cancer and birth defects--but not
for hormone effects. A committee last year devised new
testing requirements—supported by the pesticide industry--
that are expected to take effect in 2001.
It has long been suspected that various environmental
pollutants can damage brain development. Industrial
compounds called PCBs have been linked to learning
disabilities in children of women who ate contaminated
Great Lakes fish.
The link to pesticides is far from definitive, however, and
big gaps in knowledge remain. Questions abound: How do
the contaminants disrupt thyroid levels? What does that
physically do to the brain?What dose of exposure does it
take? Does the human body have some defense
mechanism to fend off low levels of hormones? What do
mixes of various man-made and natural hormones do to
people?
Some scientists suspect that the damage is passed from a
mother to her unborn child early in the first trimester,
before most women even know they are pregnant.
Thyroid hormones guide the nerve cells that dictate how
the brain of a fetus develops and the number of brain cells
created. One theory is that if a mother receives a dose of
pesticides during this critical phase, it can interfere with her
thyroid levels—sometimes raising them, sometimes
lowering them—irreversibly altering the child's nervous
system.
How the child's brain circuitry develops determines his or
her hand-eye coordination, motor skills and learning ability.
Thyroid hormones also can change behavior—an excess
can make people quick to anger, while a low count could
have the opposite effect. The hormones also can alter
steroids that control aggression and immune systems.
'Thyroid hormones are important to brain development,
and that's been known for a long time," said Dr. Harley
http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 4 of 6 ,
Komblum, a pediatric neurologist at the UCLA Medical
Center. But, he and other neurologists say, it's debatable
how important the mother's thyroid level is to the fetus, and
it's even more uncertain what role environmental
contaminants may play.
Porter said children up to age 8 who have developing
brains and immune systems are "especially vulnerable"to
changes in thyroid hormones.
Some symptoms of children exposed to pesticides are
similar to attention deficit hyperactivity disorders, which
have been increasingly diagnosed in American children.
Some medical research supports a link between thyroid
hormones and those disorders, but the connection,
especially with pesticides, remains unclear.
The implication for adults, and whether pesticides might
cause thyroid disorders, also is unknown.
In the study of 50 Mexican children, the scientists, led by
anthropologist Elizabeth Guillette of the University of
Arizona, said genetic and social factors—including income,
education and health services—are so similar between the
farm valley and the foothills that they cannot explain the
differences in the youngsters' cognitive ability.
"These children share similar genetic background, diets,
water mineral contents, cultural patterns and social
behaviors. The major difference was their exposure to
pesticides," Guillette and Mexican researchers said in a
report published in June in the journal Environmental
Health Perspectives.
Most of the stick-figure drawings by the 4- and 5-year-olds
in the farm valley were unrecognizable as human beings—
they look like the scribbles of a 2-year-old. In contrast,
drawings by the foothill children had heads, eyes, torsos,
arms and legs.
Experts say that the inability to draw a person indicates a
breakdown between the brain's ability to process visual
information and its ability to control fine muscles.
"Some valley mothers stressed their own frustration in
trying to teach their child how to draw. In addition, two
valley children drew pictures composed of boxes, arches
and lines, claiming these pictures were people," the
researchers reported.
Other tests pointed to recollection and stamina problems.
One foothill child could jump for 336 seconds—over three
times longer than the best-performing valley child.
Some scientists remain dubious of the results because the
tests on the children were unusual, and are intrinsically
subjective and difficult to interpret.
Dr. Richard Jackson, director of the National Center for
Environmental Health at the federal Centers for Disease
http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7edl3f8&NS-docoffset=22&NS-adv-search=l 3/15/99
Pesticides May Harm Brain, Study Says Page 5 of 6
Control and Prevention, said his staff was "unimpressed by
the scientific rigor" of the work in the report.
McCarthy said that although the differences between the
two populations of children seem striking, other hidden
factors, rather than pesticide exposure, cannot be ruled
out.
Other studies, meanwhile, show that pesticide exposure
during the first trimester of pregnancy increases birth
defects.
The University of Minnesota and the federal EPA in a 1996
study found a high rate of birth defects in the children of
Minnesotans who work as pesticide appliers as well as the
general population of western Minnesota, a major farm
region with heavy pesticide use.
The defect rate was the highest among babies born nine
months after the spring season, indicating that the risk
rises for children conceived during the time when pesticide
use increases.
In Porter's 5-year study of mice, the animals drank water
containing a mixture of two pesticides—aldicarb and
atrazine—and nitrates from fertilizer.
The concentrations ingested by the mice were similar to
those found in ground water in many agricultural areas,
Porter said. Aldicarb, atrazine and nitrates are the three
most abundant agricultural contaminants in the United
States, although they do not rank high in use in California.
While the mix of the three chemicals altered the mice
hormones, each one alone did not. That points out a
gaping hole in the federal effort to protect consumers—the
EPA only tests for effects of pesticides individually, not
cumulatively.
The EPA tests, Porter said, "generate a great deal of false
confidence in the safety" of pesticides.
Drawing an Unsettling Picture
Scientists say children may suffer permanent brain defects
from pesticide exposure. In Sonora, Mexico, a study found
that Yaqui Indian preschoolers in a farming region
exhibited poor motor skills compared with their
counterparts in adjacent foothills where no pesticides are
used. When asked to draw a person, the farm valley's 4-
and 5-year-olds mostly drew meaningless circles and lines.
Source: Environmental Health Perspectives, June 1998.
CoovdaM 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved
http://www.latimes.com/s.../aaaa001 U7ed13f8&NS-doc-offset=22&NS-adv-search=1 3/15/99
wry moves to annex botsa unica Page I of 1
community news ItIonte Page ;- m,
DCMOI tar.CDM THE ORANGE matrry REGtnm I Nes .T--WARCH
City moves to annex Bolsa Chica HOME PAGE
TODAY'S NEWS
DEVELOPMENT: Huntington Beach says the A`RUTOMonvE
1,600 acres could bring millions in tax revenue. BUSINESSa FINANCE
CLASSIFIED
COLUMNS
February 23, 1999 COMMUNNY NEWS
Z
OommuNty Everts
By OLIVIA HAWKINSON SmReacem s
The Orange County Register ; TM
•R.w
HUNTINGTON BEACH—The city may be primed for a -G Ian
growth spurt. 'Ma=
O.C.Temm
-Posh a Govemmem
The City Council voted 5-2 Monday night to start talks to ,,gM In Edu n
annex 1,600 acres of the Bolsa Chica wetlands and bluffs •SpedN FeaWles
EDUCATION
along Pacific Coast Highway, EMPLOYMENT
ENTERTAINMENT 3
Councilwoman Shirley Dettloff,chairwoman of the Bolsa FUAN&GAMES
Chica subcommittee,said, "This is an area that we surround. HEALTH a FITNESS
It's a verycritical area to this city. The residents want this city LIBERTY ONLINE
ty ty LIVING It SHOPPING
to have more of a role in Bolsa Chica." POLITICS a
GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE
The council acted to start the annexation process—one that SCIENCE a
could take three years for completion—before builder TEC NOLOG8 Y
Hearthside Homes breaks ground on a planned 1,200 homes on PROMOTIONS
the Bolsa Chica mesa. SPORTS a RECREATION
WEATHER
Members of environmental groups such as the Bolsa Chica
Land Trust condemned the plan and accused city leaders of
keeping their eyes fixed on dollar signs.Council members said
they saw development as inevitable,and that through
annexation,the city could capture millions in taxes that would
otherwise go to the county.
Hearthside's plans depend on Coastal Commission approval,
completion of a water pipeline from Cypress and pending
lawsuits between the company and the land trust.
Perhaps(council members)convinced themselves 1,000
homes out there isn't so bad,"trust member Connie Boardman
said. "I'm real disappointed."
newspaper In reuse
. ..fie .
CopRiaM 1aBD The Onlge Count/Rea4ter
Please xM mnvnanq b oveolete eM.heeCom.cam
httpJ/www.ocregister.com/community/bolsaO23w.shtml 2/23/99
Supervsors Back Coastal Coalition Plan Page I or t
ews H co F, e 7,
Y / ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP
shop your new home online_I
14"IIm,�Net'""rYs"m � t�oatltaals �Y� � ;'�
Wednesday,
C Nary 24, 1999
Supervisors Back Coastal Coalition Plan
.Environment: The panel would unite city, county and state officials in
fighting beach erosion in O.C.
By DAVID REYES, Timer StaBWrilo
he Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously
RELATED endorsed formation of a coastal coalition to help combat
o.c. ECTI N beach erosion along Orange County's 42-mile shoreline.The coalition,proposed by Supervisor Tom Wilson,would
NEWS BY provide a"united front"with all six coastal cities,the county
COMMUNITY and state to lobby for passage of legislation such as Assembly
Bill 64,written by Assemblywoman Denise Ducheny(D-San
SPORTS Diego).
PREP SPORTS Ducheny's bill,which this week won the endorsement of the
San Clemente City Council,calls for a statewide program to
BUSINESS restore California beaches.
"We're trying to coalesce coastal cities and recognize we all
LIFE&STYLE have a problem and that AB 64 is one of the tools," Wilson
CALENDAR said. "We need a galvanized group."
Tide pools and beaches need to be preserved,Wilson said,
CALENDAR and water quality should be top priority for swimmers and
WEEKEND surfers.
HOME DESIGN The group,dubbed the Orange County Coastal Coalition,
would comprise elected officials from Seal Beach,Huntington
COMMENTARY Beach,Newport Beach,Laguna Beach,Dana Point and San
Clemente; Wilson and fellow Supervisor Jim Silva;and a state
T.V.TIMES parks representative.
In the short term,Wilson said,the coalition would lobby for
passage of Ducheny's bill and"show the federal government"
that Orange County is united on the issue of coastal
preservation.
ADVti"StuEW The concept already has support from the cities.
In a telephone interview,Huntington Beach administrator
psi"
Ray Silver said his city "is really excited" about he helps
proposal. "I think it's a great effort We need all the help we can �
get1.
Huntington Beach has had a severe problem with erosion,
especially with the bluffs north of Golden West Street The city
fenced off part of the area after the crumbling bluffs
undermined a coastal path popular for biking,nulnin9 and
walking.
" ♦J — Coincidentally, Mayor Peter M. Green and Councilwoman
rowaeam a.nw a Shirley S. Dettloff are in Washington,D.C.,this week lobbying
.rY' for federal help to shore up the bluffs,Silver said.
http://www.iadmes.comtHomFINEWStORANGE/OCNEWS/t000017153.htn'd 224/99
nuuuugwu rviuves w n =nova t.mca we, anns,mesa rage c oe
1997,when the state bought 880 acres of the marsh. But
environmentalists contend that building homes on the mesa
above would damage the ecosystem that supports the wetlands,
�-r-% v undermining all previous preservation efforts.
Si Voting against annexation were council members Tom
Harman and Dave Sullivan, both of whom expressed serious
�) reservations about any development of the area
n, .. "What they must have for development is Huntington Beach
water;' Sullivan said. "1f they want Huntington Beach's water, I
suggest that they walk to the end of our pier and jump in."
The council has wrestled with the issue for years,and many
city officials remain opposed to any development on the
grasslands along Warner Avenue near Pacific Coast Highway.
But Hearthside has a binding agreement with Orange
County to build 1,235 homes there,and the state's annexation
laws mandate that the city accept that deal.
With annexation would come leverage for the city,however,
because it would be providing water for the new homes. The
alternative would be for Hearthside and Southern California
Water Co.to build a$13-million,six-mile water pipeline from
Cypress.
The negotiations also could lead to some compromises such
as a wider buffer around the wetlands, fewer homes and more
park space.
Some council members and environmentalists still hope the
bluff-top acreage can be purchased and preserved by the state
or federal government,even given the$135 million that the
city estimates the property to be worth.
But that is a pipe dream,said Lucy Dunn, Hearthside
executive vice president.The development company,which
originally envisioned building 6,000 homes and a marina on
the wetlands,has no interest in selling. The environment would
be best served by allowing Hearthside to build the houses and,
at the same time,improve the wetlands area,which is a
sanctuary for birds,she said.
Part of The City?
Huntington Beach officials heard from environmentalists
and other residents Monday on whether to begin the process of
annexing 200 acres above the Bolsa Chica wetlands.
Copyright 1999 Los Angela Times.All Rights Reserved
b Samch the archives of the Los Angela Times for similar stories about
BOLSA CHICA WETLANDS ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY
Ht1NTINGTON BEACH(CAl—ANNEXATION . RANGE C
DEVELUPM ' TIAND EVEDhE WPMEN 1.You coil net be charged
to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
e:wS G� I a n ex GO
http://www.latimcs.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000016833.htad 2/23/99
rrow nolsa L mca ueoate ueveropea over years rage r or
as ome age m,
community news
iL OCII091d .001111 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH
How Bolsa Chica debate developed HOME PAGE
over years TODArS NEWS
ARCHIVES
AUTOMOTIVE
February 23, 1999 BUSINESS&FINANCE
CLASSIFIED
COLUMNS
By OLIVIA HAWKINSON COMMUNITY NEWS•Todara slaves
and GIL HOPENSTAND -Seaches Events
The Orange County Register • ecant.a coons
-Education
•EI Toro
HUNTINGTON BEACH—The city's move to annex the •FinmaAcN
Bolsa Chica wetlands is the latest chapter in a development aegei ilna
debate that has spanned 25 years. •°cUieens
•PoINa&Government
"The company really has no position one way or the other on Refgmn In E&uraaon
annexation," said Lucy Dunn,spokeswoman for Hearthside •Special FeaWres
EDUCATION
Homes,which plans to build houses in the Bolsa Chica area. EMPLOYMENT
ENTERTAINMENT&
TRAVEL
Here's how the pending annexation developed: FUN&GAMES
HEALTH&FITNESS
LIBERTY ONLINE
e 1970—Signal Landmark,now a subsidiary of California LIVING&SHOPPING
Coastal Communities Inc.—the parent company of POLITICS&
GOVERNMENT
Hearthside Homes and formerly known as Koll Real Estate REAL ESTATE
Group Inc.—buys 1,600 acres in and around the Bolsa Chica SCIENCE&
W TECHNOLOGY
wetlands.
SERVICES&
e 1973—State acquires 300 acres in lowlands from Signal. PROMOTIONS
e 1976—Amigos de Bolsa Chico founded. Group's lawsuits SPORTS&WEATHER RECREATION
will hold up development.
e 1978—State builds levee,enclosing 150 acres of the state's
300-acre parcel. Seawater once again pours into Bolsa Chica
and restores a portion of wetlands.
. 1982—County supervisors approve 5,700 homes,boat slips,
a navigable ocean entrance and 600 acres of salt marshes.
e 1985—County supervisors approve 5,700 homes,a 1,300-slip
marina,915 acres of restored wetlands,oceanfront hotels,
shops and restaurants.
• 1992—Bolas Chica Land Trust forms to save the area as an
ecological preserve held in public trust forever. Group's
lawsuits will hold up development.City Council approves
106-acre Bolas Chica Regional Park,later renamed for Harriett ,
Wieder.
. 1994—County supervisors approve plan for 3,300 homes,
including 900 in the lowlands. California Coastal Commission
approves plan in January 1996.
e February 1997—State purchases 880 acres of Bolsa Chica
and is developing wetland preservation plan.Number of
homes scaled down to 2,400.
e May 1997—Superior Court judge sends plan back to Coastal
Commission, number of homes reduced to 1,235.
e November 1997—County supervisors unanimously approve
http://www.ocmgister.con)/community/bolsas23w.shtml 2/23/99
now aofsa k.mca oeoafe oevefopeo over years rage z of
scaled down Bolsa Chica plan.
. February 1998—Judge sends Boise Chica plan back to
Coastal Commission.
. January 1999—Decision on lawsuit delayed by state court
of appeals.Judgment expected by May.
newspaper e
co MIMmeOmWcomaae&W
f9eaee oommenaro mmoaMra)Ilnk.haeeom.mm
http://www.om-gister.rom/community/bolsas23w.shtml 2123/99
nunungwn SVIUVes w rwuex vUtsd Lsuea weuwrus,1Vsesa rage t Ul
ewS
f I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP`a
O.n... .A.....siw
Minxi.Wm PX»i.n raniJaPN"rMe
ues ay, February 23, 1999
Huntington Moves to Annex Bolsa Chica Wetlands,Mesa
■Environment: Council's 5-2 vote could mean eventual resolution of a
30-year fight over the 1,600-acre area.
By LESLEY WRIGHT,Special to The Times
n a move that may signal an end to the 30-year struggle
RELAYED over the future of the Bolsa Chica wetlands,Huntington
O.C.CSECTION Beach's City Council voted 5 to 2 Monday to begin the
process of annexing the area.
MAIN PAGE Some council members said their hope is that bringing all
1,600 acres of the pristine coastal land under city jurisdiction
NEWS BY will give them some leverage with landowner Hearthside
COMMUNITY Homes Inc.,formerly known as Koll Real Estate Group.
SPORTS "Our first consideration should be saving that precious
area," Councilwoman Shirley S. Dettloff said. "But we must be
PREP SPORTS prepared for a development project that is moving very
quickly. We must be sure that development is done the right
BUSINESS way."
SO CAL LIVING More than 100 environmentalists and other residents packed
council chambers to hear the debate. Two dozen of them spoke,
CALENDAR begging the council to preserve the land as open space.
"We understand annexation will give[city] water to a
CALENDAR developer," said Paul Horgan of Bolas Chica Land Trust,a
WEEKEND group trying to buy the land to prevent it from being
HOME DESIGN developed. "Ask your staff one more question:How we you
going to give Bolsa Chica a proper funeral?"
COMMENTARY The stakes are high for city officials,most of whom have
T.V.TIMES played some part in the fight to stop development in Bolas
Chica
The city stands to gain$2 million in one-time permit and
other fees if it annexes the property now.After development,
annexing a residential area could cost the city more in new
ADVERTISEMENT services than the homes would pay in taxes.
Monday's decision marked just the fast step toward what is
,RIUM,Q; certain to be intense negotiation over the future of the 200-acre r
MasuyDy, mesa that overlooks the wetlands.
The bulk of the wetlands was removed from the struggle in
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016833.html 2/23/99
aupGrYuulb DdcA l Ua uu �owmon Plan Page 2 oI L
"The message is 'Let's get the people involved . . . and have
one voice, one group,' " Mayor Pro Tem Dave Garofalo said.
"If we're going to get things together, we need to [get] the state
senators and assembly members involved rather than get six
mayors on a plane."
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
BEACHES--ORANGE COUNTY EROSION SAND TOM WILSON
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.You will not he
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
GO Id ❑ e% Go
http://www.latimes.com/HONE/NEWS/ORANGEJOCNEWS/t000017153.btm] 224/99
toxic Soup Unaer wavy ease ureps towara water Supply rage t ut
ews oo ie n w
II / ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
Monday, Febmary 22, 1999
Toxic Soup Under Navy Base Creeps Toward Water Supply
.Environment: The Seal Beach plume is half a mile long, composed of
chemicals used to clean rocket boosters for the first moon landing.
By JANET WIGSON, Times Staff Writer
n underground plume of toxic waste is slowly seeping
toward subsurface drinking water supplies for Seal
RELATED Beach and the Naval Weapons Station there,documents
O.C.SECTIONS and interviews show.
MAIN PAGE The plume is a half-mile-long stew of chemicals once used
to clean rocket boosters that blasted Apollo I l to the moon.
NEWS BY The Saturn V boosters were built at the weapons station in the
COMMUNITY late 1960s and early '70s by what was then North American
SPORTS Rockwell.
"This was a time when there was a race to put man on the
PREP SPORTS moon,to beat the Soviet Union. It's a time when certain risks
were taken," said Gregg Smith,spokesman for the weapons
BUSINESS station.
SO CAL LIVING David Baillie,environmental director for the base, said,
"Back then . . .what everybody thought was,'You pour it in the
CALENDAR ground and it goes away.' As the whole country got smarter,we
said 'OK, what do we have left behind?' "
CALENDAR Officials say the plume poses no immediate danger to
WEEKEND drinking water supplies. But extensive testing is being
HOME DESIGN conducted to determine potential health risks and how to
contain or remove the spreading chemicals before they reach at
COMMENTARY least one nearby drinking well.
T.V.TIMES Tests concluded this month found 163,000 parts per billion
of TCE,a cancer-causing toxic solvent, in water pumped from
the middle of the top layer of the plume. The safe level for
drinking water is 5 parts per billion,according to federal and
state standards.
ADVERTISEMENT Breathing,drinking or swimming in water with high levels
of TCE may cause liver and long damage,abnormal heartbeat,
7•4 ANNUA coma and even death.
\fy'"� Because the plume is beneath the surface of a secured
e 0 J military base, experts agree there is not an immediate threat.
http://www.latimes.com/IiOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t00001654l.html 2/22199
r uw.c neup unuer .Navy nase�meps IOwarn wafer auppry rage a or•Q
"Nobody's going to say'I'm thirsty' and bend down and have
a drink," said geologist Carl Lind of Bechtel National Inc.,the
San Diego-based contractor that conducted the tests.
But there is a long-term risk to drinking water supplies
because toxic plumes are tricky to clean up or contain.
+�c "Obviously,there is cause for concem," said Patricia
Universi Hannon of the state's Regional Water Quality Control Board
Allianc ty division that handles Seal Beach. 'There is no immediate risk.
. . but there is real concern."
The plume,which measures 2,500 by 2,000 feet in its
widest layer,has descended 195 feet beneath the surface and is
almost one-third of its way to the nearest drinking water
aquifer, at 600 feet.
There are two drinking water wells near the contaminated
site,one owned by the military base,the other by the city of
Seal Beach. But they draw water from deep below the plume,
officials say.
The plume also is far from the national wildlife refuge on
the base,they said,and is generally drifting southwest,away
from populated areas such as Leisure World or downtown Seal
Beach.
During the rainy season,it partially reverses direction,the
tests found.
Scientists involved in the project say there is no way to
know exactly why there is contamination at the site.They
theorize that the chemicals,mostly TCE,may have leaked from
tanker trucks that were driven onto the base at the north end,
new Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue.The
trucks pumped their liquid cargo into two storage tanks in use
from 1962 to 1973.
Today, the tanks sit empty and rusting outside a complex of
hulking gray metal buildings that are a familiar sight to anyone
driving along the San Diego Freeway past Seal Beach.
The buildings,known as the Research and Testing
Evaluation Center,were rented by NASA and used by North
American Rockwell to build the second stage of the Sarum V
boosters,one of which blasted Neil Armstrong and his fellow
astronauts toward the moon in July 1969.
During the assembly process,TCE was pumped into the
buildings by hose and sprayed inside the boosters to remove oil
and grit.
"Clamps may not have been tightened properly, a gallon
may have been spilled here or there," said Robert Robinson,
who is coordinating a massive cleanup project at the base
involving several dozen sites. "But when it's a gallon of
something that is measured in parts per billion, you want to
make sure. . . it won't ever he a problem."
Geologist Lind agreed. "A cup a day here,a cup there,and '
you've got that huge plume underneath now. It's amazing."
TCE,or trichlomethylene,is the same chemical that has
been detected in huge underground plumes threatening
drinking water supplies for 600,000 residents in San
Bernardino and Riverside counties.A 3-mile-wide plume under
the Woodbridge section of Irvine contains both TCE left in the
soil by the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station and nitrates from
area farming.Navy officials said the plume associated with the
Saturn V construction,and another smaller one on the base, are
httpJ/www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016541.html 2/22/99
t owc n0up unaer tNavy vase i reeps i owaro wmer auppty rage J ut v
"a drop in the bucket" compared with the San Bernardino and
Irvine plumes.
But concerned Seal Beach residents said they will monitor
carefully how the situation is handled.
"This is our drinking water area, right here,"said Mario
Voce,a Seal Beach artist and longtime activist who co-chairs a
Restoration Advisory Board established by the Navy to offer
input on the cleanup of hazardous waste at the base. "I think
they know we're going to be breathing hard down their necks."
Robinson,the cleanup coordinator,said the slow seepage of
the toxic waste through layers of soil, sand and clay would
filter and disperse many of the contaminants. Baillie noted that
the plume was moving extremely slowly and appeared to be
blocked by a layer of thick clay.
"It took 30 years to get this deep,"he said,referring to the
current 195 feet.
Still,the plume could reach the Navy well "in the next
decade," according to the Bechtel draft report.
And Hannon of the Regional Water Quality Control Board
said the plume could find an opening in the clay strata and
spread faster.
"Anything's possible," she said. She and community
activists said the Navy appeared to be doing what it should to
determine how to best contain and clean up the plume.
There are several options normally used to handle an
underground toxic plume: leaving it in place and injecting it
with substances to neutralize the poison; leaving it in place and
monitoring it to see if it disperses naturally;or pumping the
contaminated water out,removing the toxic chemicals and
disposing of both.
As part of the recent testing,300,000 gallons of
contaminated water from the plume have already been pumped
out. The water was treated and released into a storm channel
that drains into the Pacific Ocean.
The environmental quality control board that advises the
Seal Beach City Council asked last week that testing be
expanded to off-base areas if necessary.
"There's no problem with that," Robinson said. "But it's not
necessary from what we've seen."
RRR
Navy Attacks Clean-Up Sites
Military officials are trying to prevent an underground toxic
plume from drifting into the water table beneath the Seal Beach
Naval Weapons Station. Loaded with chemicals used to build ,
rockets in the 1970s,the plume extends from one of 27
hazardous waste sites targeted for cleanup.
(map)
Gaging the Plume
The toxic plume,which reaches 195 feet deep, is about a a
third of the way to the nearest drinking water aquifer at 600
feet.
Source:The Weapons Support Facility-- Seal Beach
Graphics reporting by BRADY MacDONALD/Los
http•J/www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000016541.html 2122/99
Interior Secretary Pulls Out of Water Otspute rage i or o
ewa _ Ir ae n ax Z ao
A SECTION N6LP?
1 " . iluhiggest searchable help wanted sedionandjohI 11
1'hurs ay, February 11, 1993
Interior Secretary Pulls Out of Water Dispute
■Allocation: Move halts mediation. State's share of Colorado River
could be at stake.
By TONY PERRY, Timet Staff Wrtw
nterior Secretary Bruce Babbitt on Wednesday halted his
attempts to mediate an increasingly bitter dispute
between the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California and two agricultural irrigation districts--a sign that a
ADVERTISEMENT water deal considered key to the state's water future may be
collapsing.
If negotiations fail between the MWD,the Imperial
Irrigation District and the Coachella Valley Water District,it
N w w s could set off a domino effect that might prompt Babbitt to carry
through on his oft-stated threat to reduce the amount of water
California receives from the Colorado River.
Babbitt is withdrawing from the negotiations out of
, annoyance at the MWD's recent insistence that he consider
- changing the 1931 agreement that gives farmers more than
75%of the state's annual allocation from the Colorado River.
The MWD suggestion,an eleventh-hour change in position
after years of negotiation,has infuriated farmers and set off
threats of litigation.
Babbitt told MWD directors two weeks ago that he does not
have the authority to change the 1931 agreement and that the
MWD's insistence otherwise threatens to scuttle a carefully
negotiated water transfer between Imperial Valley and San
Diego County. So far,the MWD has refused to back down.
In effect,Babbitt is calling the MWD's bluff to determine
whether the agency will risk having the state's Colorado River
share reduced by continuing to bring up the 1931 agreement as
part of its negotiations with Imperial and Coachella.
On the other hand,if the MWD remains firm and declines to
sign an agreement with Imperial and Coachella unless
modifications are made in the allocation formula,it would test r
whether Babbitt's threat is real.
Many in the water industry believe that no secretary of the
Interior will ever reduce water allocations to California and
thus bring economic turmoil to the largest state in the nation,
particularly as a presidential election approaches.
In a fax to all sides,Babbitt encouraged the MWD and the
two agricultural irrigation districts to continue negotiations
without his assistance—although history suggests that without
outside assistance, California water disputes are rarely settled.
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000013155.html 2111/99
interior secretary rents Vut of water utspute rags_of
"It appears to me that the parties,having come so close to
agreement in January,are now drifting apart," Babbitt wrote.
"I truly hope this does not signal the onset of yet another
western water war."
Babbitt suggested that the California agencies settle their
differences before he resumes his mediation.
Negotiations had been set to resume today in Los Angeles
with a mediator assigned by Babbitt,and further meetings had
been planned for Washington.At issue are matters of how
much water each party can expect in dry years and wet years
and who will pay for conveyance and storage facilities.
Under the 1931 agreement,California is assured 4.4 million
acre-feet of water a year from the Colorado—with 3.85 million
of that split among irrigation districts in the Imperial,
Coachella and Palo Verde valleys,and 550,000 acre-feet
allotted to the MWD.
In recent years,however,the MWD,which serves 16
million residents,has annually received several hundred
thousand acre-feet above its allotment. With its entitlement and
the "surplus"allotment,California's take from the Colorado
River has reached 5.2-million acre-feet.
Babbitt has insisted that California go on a water diet and
learn to live within its 4.4-million share because surpluses will
not be available indefinitely. As a motivation for California to
fend ways to cut its water use, Babbitt has threatened to reduce
the allocations of surplus water.
Jesse Silva,acting general manager of the Imperial
Irrigation District,said of Babbitt's Withdrawal from mediation:
"We're sorry that MWD's demand brought this situation on. We
don4 want to see it interfere with the San Diego agreement."
Joseph Parker, San Diego County Water Authority board
chairman,said, "This is an unfortunate turn of events that could
put our transfer[with Imperial Valley] in peril." He said the
issue is made more difficult by"a certain amount of
belligerence" by various parties.
The Imperial Irrigation District has agreed to sell up to
300,000 acre-feet of water a year to San Diego—enough for 2.4
million people—but the deal can only be consummated if the
MWD,Imperial and Coachella dispute is settled.
MWD Chairman Phillip J.Pace declined to comment on
Babbitfs move,referring instead to a letter sent Wednesday to
Imperial Irrigation District officials. Pace wrote that he was
heartened by comments made Tuesday at the MWD meeting by
Imperial Irrigation District board President Bence Kuhn that he
would be willing to continue discussions with the MWD.
Pace,however,chose to overlook less accommodating
comments,including a vow by Imperial board member Andy
Home that "I can assure you we will not stand by and allow our
water to he taken. We will resist such efforts with every
resource at our disposal."
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
BRUCE BABBIT METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT.COLORADO
RIVER.WATER—CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA—AGRICULTURE.
http://www.latimes.com/HONIE/NEWS/ASECTION/t000013155.hbnl 2/11/99
vaclaaayc %.vunL.y aenrLdL,Iun ulbt-ncib
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # .�Date Subject
Los Angeles Times
The MWD has irritated the Legislature—where a
MWD Keeps hearing is net for today—and has come away bitterly
disappointed in negotiations over future water sup-
p es.
Pot Near Boil a the dispute over cleaning up the a north delta,
the MWD's preferred alternative, a north-soth
Pieaca sae WATER,AW
WATER. Y —L_t In December, Jolts Foley, wft,ho
�•n r WATER:
x 1-1 Sa]`g`t rune the water and newer district
ui Water Wars 1 YLaguna
term Niguel, ended lids hen-
ear term us MWD hoard then-
man.Over �'As ct successor,board , who
bets selected evllip J. Pace, who
■ Resources: Bruised and embattled, Mona a land development firm er
the agency has adopted an aggressive . Allocation ofMontebelloCs, tra e a board member
j of the Central Basin Municipal
stance in questioning the accords that I Water District.
Continued from AS With the more assertive Pace as
govern its allocations. Continued
canal that would allow I chairman, the MWD board has
the MWD to receive dean water adopted an aggressive strategy for
BY TONY PERRY . from north of the delta, has been getting more water from the Colo-
TIMES UJkFFw11miR put on the back burned. Former rado Rivar.Nomore Mr.Conseiaun.
The governing board of the Me Gov. Pete Wdeon, long a canal The Pace-led strategy has been
Metropolitan Water supporter, backed down rather to launch an assault on the mot
District of Southern California took time last week to than go to war with Northern heavily fortified spot of legal and
search for the appropriate term to describe the ruckus California and the environmental political high ground in the Call-
it has kicked uprecentlyinthewaterworld movement. - forma wale was map: the 1931
"It's fairly obvious to me that we're in battle—full In the Colorado River dispute, agreement that assures that more
battle," said Jorge G. Castro, who represents the Wilson and the Legislature forced than 75% of the state's annual
Central Basin Municipal Water District the MWD to accept a massive sale allmUon of Colorado River water
"I wouldn't characterize It BE starting a war," said of water from the Imperial Irriga- i goes to Imperial, Coachella and
Bill Luddy, who represents Los Angeles. "I would tion District to the San Diego tiny isUto a serving farmers in the
characterize It Be asking a clear and necessary County Water Authority,long the Palo Verde Valley and Yuma.Ariz.
question.' MWD's biggest and most dissatis- In the Wodraska-Foley era, the
Whatever you call it,the MWD's recent strategy of Bel member and customer. .MWD strategy was to muffle its
questioning whether four agricultural Irrigation die- The delta dispute is pretty much diacantent over the 1931 agreement
tricts should continue getting the had's share of the beyond the MWD's influence. An lest itMeup the agricultural irriga-
etate's annual allmation from the Colorado River ban attempt at forging a pro-canal tion districts and lead to cosily and
been explosive from San Diego to Washington, alliance between water agencies in time-consuming litigation.
Not that fighting over water is,new to the MWD. the south and north and more That strategy ended last month
This in the agency that made modern Southern moderate environmental groups when the MWD board endorsed a
failed policy statement asking Interim
NEWSANALYSIS But in the Colorado River con- Secretary Bruce Babbitt te con-
alilornia areality by 5 htin and tar troversy,the MWD has some lev- cider changing the 1931 agmation
rOffw 1,le g g largely whining the stage,possibly for the last time m a formula and amusing Babbitt of
gal and engineering battles to provide this generation. The Colorado River ignoring the needs of coastal
:emiarld region with a water supply that is, reliable, negotiations are supposed to Battle Southern California.
)IMUU and affordable. 'matters of allocation and efficient The reaction was predictable:
Now the MWD is,engaged in a two-front war that use for decades. The Imperial district,where water
vill determine the future of its main sources of water: Unless,the MWD gets a deal with rights date to 1895, went ballistic,
he Sacrament Di
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the Colorado the Imperial Irrigation strict and Coachella was peeved and San s
I
iver, the Coachella Valley Water Dis- Diego expressed shock.
Rightly or wrongly, the MWD says It is being trlct over water,allocations and Babbitt,considered the most wa-
ummeled in both disputes and that the future of 18 I money, the water sale between ter-knowledgeable Interior seede-
UIRon people and a$500,-billion regional economy is, Imperial and San Diego,considered lazy in the nation's history,said he
I Pull. crucial to the states water future, lacked authority to change the
As a result the mega-agency has adopted a policy cannot be conaummated 1931 agreement. He implored the
:tat, once the bureauedatese is stripped away, boils Add to this the fact that the MWD to drop the matte. Others
own to: "We're mad as heft and not going in take It MWD is undergoing a leadership have done likewise.
nymore." change at the top,always a props- "Were baffled that @letropch-
MWD seems to feel very put upon,"said an outside tioo time fur repudiating old strat- tan] would take unilateral,warlike
ffidal.Put upon and misunderstood i allies and developing new ones. actions," Bruce Kuhn, president of
At the Tuesday meeting,Luddy made a comment to In October, John Wodraska re- the Imperial Irrigation District,told
is effect that the MWD's hometown of I.o Angeles is Biped as general manager to take the MWD board Iasi week. "We j
n island of sanity in an otherwise bizarre world a lucrative job in the private sector. urge you to rethink what you are
Not only has the MWD been losing battles lately,it A nationwide search is underway doing before you provoke a water
38 not been making many friends. for Wodra ka's successor. crisis in which everyone will lase."
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page 7F Date Subject
Los Angeles 'riMes G
A day later,Babbitt,a msperated
at the in-your-face time of letters
from Pace, called off his attempts
to mediate negotiations between
the MWD,Imperial and Coachella.
Part of Babbitt's frustration is
that he felt the MWD had con-
cluded in the latter stages of the
Wodraska-Foley era that Its beet
bet was to cooperate with the San
Diego-Imperial deal in order to get
two things it wants desperately:
*More generous rules about
when the MWD tan receivesurplus
water from the Colorado River.
•A new method of operating
Lake Mead. the reservoir behind
Hoover Dam,that would also mean
more water for the MWD.
r allow Laver vrvmg Lmna New borrow rage 1 or y
eWS _'+ GO Te A ex _ _ "_ GO
YI I FRONT PAGE HELPI
• • • I♦i .II
urs ay, elomary I , 1999
Yellow River Giving China New Sorrow
■Asia: Overuse,dry weather deplete waterway once known for flooding.
By HENRYCHU, Times Staff Writer
121 AWANG, China--She gave birth to one of the world's
most glorious ancient civilizations. For more than 4,000
years,she has nurtured billions of fields and farmers
spread alongside her. Millions still rely on her bounty today.
ADVEFTISEMEW But like so many working mothers,the Yellow River is
exhausted, her resources dwindling, her energy flagging. The
3,600-mile-long waterway known throughout history as
"China's sorrow" because of a penchant for spilling over is now
News causing despair for precisely the opposite reason: It is drying
UP.
"We depend on the Yellow River for our lives," said Wu
w hr'r I� Rachun,a wiry farmer in this dusty hamlet in China's
r•t••••�vt•• b Shandong province in the east. "But I haven't watered my fields
once since sowing season last October."
How low Wu's predicament is a woefully familiar one as overuse,
can we go? countoor ry's planning
ty all water ystems,d dry climatic daffec g deplete one rural and s
urban residents alike. While the world's attention focused last
summer on the devastating Yangtze River floods in central and
southern China, northern China--fed by the Yellow River and
home to half the country's 1.2 billion people--was grappling
with its own water problem: a worsening shortage of enormous
proportions.
More than 300 of the north's 600 cities suffer from a lack of
water, so acute in some places that residents are allotted a
meager trickle for only a few hours each day. Large
metropolises like Beijing,and industrial centers such as the city
of Taiyuan, have pumped so much water from underground
sources that the aquifers cannot keep up.
Here in Shandong province,China's breadbasket, many t
farmers count themselves lucky if they can irrigate their fields
once a year. In 1997--the worst year on record--the Yellow
River was so drained by the time it coursed through Shandong,
its last stop before the sea,that it failed to reach the ocean for a
staggering 266 days. Some tributaries and lakes have vanished.
"Water is desperately short," said Daniel Gunaratnam,an
expert at the World Bank who is based in Beijing.
China's water deficit ranges between 22 billion and 33
billion tons, Gunaratnarn estimates—about five to seven times
http://www.latimes.com/HONIEtNEWS/FRONT/t00001514l.htnil 2/18/99
....v.. .....,. w r u.�.umm,vc ry ouuuw rage z or 4
the amount that Southern California uses a year.By 2030,the
shortfall could rise as high as 110 billion tons as the population
increases to 1.5 billion.
The country's troubles stem from a cruel trick of nature on
China and the heavy demands of China on nature.
Although the Chinese population is split relatively evenly
between the north and south,arable land and available water
are not so equally divided.Just 38%of China's farmland is in
the south,but the region enjoys 82%of China's water
resources. By contrast,northern China boasts 62%of the
country's cultivated soil,but a paltry 18%of its water.
A Once-Abundant Waterway in Retreat
For millenniums after Chinese civilization sprang up along
the banks of the Yellow River,the waterway's abundance was
enough—sometimes too much.
Constant overflows claimed lives and livelihoods.A century
ago,a vast swath of the Shandong plain lay submerged under
the river's muddy flow,which destroyed fields and washed
away pieces of the delicate pottery, long buried,that the earliest
Chinese settlers there fashioned 4,000 years ago.
Since then,those settlers'modem descendants have grown
exponentially in number across China—by 700 million,or 2 1/2
times the entire U.S.population, in the past 50 years alone.
Even so, for the inhabitants who sheltered next to it, China's
"mother river,"as many locals call the Yellow,still offered an
embarrassment of riches after the People's Republic was
founded in 1949.
"Forty years ago,there was so much water that you could sit
on the embankment,wait for the fish to swim by,and go down
and catch them,"said Li Wendong,a farmer in Jijis,a village
neighboring Dawang.
Li,43,continued sadly,"There are no fish now because
there's not enough water for them to grow."
Instead, Li's black-coated sheep forage for food where once
they would have drowned. The rivets retreat has left behind
vast expanses of parched earth, shivered into crazy shapes like
a broken pane of brown glass.
"People can even drive on the riverbed,especially in the
eastern part of Henan[province] and Shandong," said Liu
Yonggong,a professor at China Agricultural University in
Beijing.
The paucity of water has exacted a huge economic toll on
the world's most-populous nation.
Up to 33 million tons in crops are lost each year because of
drought,comparable in value to the damage wrought by floods,
Gunaramam said. Four years ago,chronic water shortages
drove down Shandong's grain harvest by nearly 3.3 million
tons--enough to feed 9 million people,according to the
Washington-based Worldwatch institute.
This has prompted fear in some quarters that China,the
world's leading grain producer,may turn to massive grain
imports to compensate for declining yields,triggering a price
increase that would send shock waves through the world food
supply,especially in poorer countries.
Chinese industry also suffers from the dearth of water,
losing as much as$28 billion a year in output.
http://www.latimes.com/HONIE/NEWS/FROM/t00001514l.html 2/18/99
r ellow luver blvlrlg lAlna New borrow rage ul Y
Ironically,the turnabout in water availability,from too
much to too little,is a direct result of China's economic boom
in the past 20 years.The country's market-oriented reforms
have pulled millions out of poverty—but at tremendous cost to
its natural resources.
Farmers now push for higher and higher yields,which
demand more and more water,especially with the widespread
use of inefficient irrigation systems. Heavy industries present
another major drain.
Affluent urban lifestyles also strain the water supply,as
residents snap up Western-style toilets and washing machines,
and consume more meat and alcohol,which requires more
grain--and therefore more water--to fad livestock and to
produce liquor.
Moreover,high levels of pollution have snatched away
water suitable for irrigation and for drinking. In some areas,
river water is "so poisonous you can't use it," Liu said.
Excessive Pumping Draining Aquifers
Desperate for usable water,both the cities and rural areas of
the north have turned to underground sources. But excessive
pumping has outpaced the aquifers'ability to replenish
themselves.
A 1997 study conducted by Liu discovered that the water
tables beneath much of northern China are shrinking by about 5
feet every year.Farmers are drilling deeper and deeper wells,
but "at some point,people can no longer afford to pump water
from ever-increasing depths,"said Lester Brown,president of
Worldwatch.
Such overuse gives residents around Beijing a sinking
feeling--literally.Three suburban neighborhoods have dropped
by as much as 14 inches during the past decade,breaking pipes
and causing other damage as the ground gives way over the
compacted water tables. The Chinese capital sucks out 220
million tons of subterranean water a year.
To slow down the depletion,some local authorities have
launched conservation campaigns,erecting billboards and
running TV commercials exhorting residents to "save every
drop of water."
But attitudes such as Li Yuan's are hard to combat.
"Having a washing machine and shower is my right and
encouraged by the government as well. Haven't you read
newspaper stories about the government encouraging
[economic]consumption?"the 37-year-old telecommunications
employee asked. "I don't think that by taking fewer showers I
can increase the water supply."
One possible solution is raising the price of water, ,
incredibly cheap by Western standards.After a series of rate
increases,Beijingers still,pay only about 11 cents a ton--
equivalent to about 265 gallons,nearly what Angelenos use per
capita every two days.In rural areas,the cost can be less than
half a cent.The lowpices induce apathy about waste among
much of the population;in public buildings,broken taps
spewing water 24 hours a day are not uncommon,with no one
around who cares enough to repair them.
The state is also trying to come up with an enforceable
national policy for equitable water distribution,partly to
http://www.latimes.com/HOMF./NEWS/FRONTR000015141.html 2/18/99
a cuuw !V ver Ulvulg l tuna Acw borrow Page Y W Y
prevent regional disputes,which have already broken out in
some areas.Downstream users gripe that those along the upper
reaches of the Yellow River hog the water without thought to
the needs of people below.
For the longer term,engineers are studying the long-
discussed possibility of hauling water up to northern China
from the Yangtze River or its tributaries in the south.These
would be massive projects requiring billions of dollars,posing
a tricky political and economic calculus for the Communist
regime.
Pressure on Officials to Address Shortage
But the Beijing leadership may have little choice as the
shortage mounts. Beyond increased demand Chinese scientists
forecast that global warming will further sap water supplies in
coming years through increased evaporation,a development
that could extend the boundaries of deserts in the north.
Here in Shandong,provincial authorities are already crafting
plans for a modest price hike and allotments that are more
suitable to the needs of farmers,who use 8.8 billion tons of
water a year to irrigate 20 million hectares of land.
The city of Jinan,the provincial capital,has also moved to
protect its biggest tourist attraction:a collection of 72 natural
springs,with such poetic names as Gushing-from-the-Ground
Spring and Pearl Spring.
Their beauty inspired one of China's most famous writers,
Lao She,to rhapsodize a few decades ago:
Look at the three big springs.
They roll and foam day and night
throughout the year. . .
Always so pure, always so lively,
always so bright,
gushing, gushing, gushing,
never tiring,never retreating
only nature has this power!
But a recent visit showed the drubbing that nature has taken
from humankind. In a sad illustration of northern China's
plight, Gushing-from-the-Ground Spring didn't:It barely
managed to burp a small stream of bubbles.
Couvriv.6t 1999 Los Angeles Tunes.All Rights Reserved
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Tunes for similar storia about
DROUGHTS—CHINA.WATER SHORTAGES.YELLOW RIVER.You ,
will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
lNews; 60 I n B% GO
http://www.latimes.comtHONIE/NEWS/FRONT/t000015141.htm1 2118/99
Tor Image-Battered Congress, Y2K Problem Could Utter a Balm rage 1 oi o
ewe
• 0 B A SECTION HELF1
elleh
then-
4. i
SOUTHERN CALIFOAXG'B 10BSBURCE'" --—_
Prt ay, Pebruary , 1999
For Image-Battered Congress, Y2K Problem Could Offer a
Balm
m Politics: Lawmakers, struggling to move past impeachment
divisiveness, launch measures with which most can agree.
By FA YE FIORE, Times Staff Writer
ASHINGTON--With the fateful click of the year 2000
scarcely 10 months away,members of Congress are
seizing on an issue that some hope could help transform
their damaged public image from Do-Little Impeachers to
ADVERTISEMENT Millennial Rescue Squad.
A In the early stages of the congressional session, several bills
have been introduced in what analysts expect will be an
PEPPERDINE avalanche of Y2K legislation,even though lawmakers are no
MBA more sure than computer experts whether Jan. 1 will bring
technological Armageddon orjust another turn of the calendar
® page.
Congress is taking no chances. One of the first bills
, 1 introduced seeks to swat the dreaded millennium bug by
fiddling with the calendar itself.
As fate has it,Jan. 1, 2000,falls on a Saturday, and,
University according to federal law,the holiday must be observed on
.W Alliance' Friday--24 hours before the witching hour. The measure,
sponsored by Rep. John Linder(R-Ga.),would move the
official holiday to Monday, Jan. 3, reasoning that, if society as
we know it does indeed come to a crashing halt,the American
people could use some extra time to sift through the rubble.
"It's like Joshua asking the sun and the moon to stand still
so Israel could defeat the Amorites," said James Pinkerton,a
GOP pundit at Georgetown University.
California Weighs In
Few states are as Y2K-worried as California,home to more
than 20%of the nation's high-tech jobs and one-third of its
biotech industry,thus the parade of lawmakersjumping to t
propose corrective bills that their constituents are likely to
appreciate.
This week alone,four California members pitched two
separate measures to try to prevent$1 trillion in lawsuits
expected to arise from year 2000 glitches,with each of the
lawmakers predicting some sort of peril if Congress does not
act soon.
"Remember,we're going into a situation that's absolutely
unprecedented," Sen. Dianne Feinstein(D-Calif) said while
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000017988.html 2/26/99
rut matge-naucrea wngress, t Lt.rrootem t-owo uner a tfatm rage L of J
unveiling the "Year 2000 Fairness and Responsibility Act,"
aimed at preventing frivolous lawsuits. "We have restructured
our economy's focus into a high-technology,biotechnology
economy . . . and in order to protect people's employment,we
have to take some precautionary measures."
"This is incredibly important to California,"said Sen. Orrin
G. Hatch(R-Utah),the bill's co-sponsor. "There are threats of
lawsuits hanging all over this right now.That's what is driving
this."
On the House side, Reps. David Dreier(R-San Dimas),
Christopher Cox(R-Newport Beach)and Calvin M.Dooley
(D-Visalia)stood together earlier this week to announce the
virtually identical "Year 2000 Readiness and Responsibility
Act of 1999."
In general,the bills require a 90-day "cooling-off period"
before Y2K-related lawsuits could be filed,limit punitive
damages to$250,000 and cap fees for lawyers working on such
suits at$I,000 an hour.
And, in an effort to encourage businesses to spend their
money fixing potential problems rather than fending off
lawsuits,the bills reward those who take active steps with
protections in the event litigation is eventually filed. If a hotel,
for example,attempted to prevent its computer-operated
elevators from crashing,the effort would be taken into account
even if there was a mishap.
In turn, businesses that fail to act would be subject to greater
exposure in court. Personal injury awards would not be limited
An Issue Yielding Little Argument
Supported by dozens of industry groups and opposed by
trial lawyers,the legislation stems from widespread fear in the
business community that any trouble-shooting now would be
seen as an acknowledgment of problems that could be used in
court later.
"To even say I'm afraid I might get sued is like throwing
blood in the water;the fins begin to go round and round," one
Washington business leader said.
The yearning among lawmakers to move beyond the
divisiveness and distraction of President Clinton's
impeachment trial helps explain the expected blimrd of Y2K-
related legislation.
Next Tuesday,the Senate is scheduled to vote on a bill to
provide small business loans for technological upgrades,then
meet in closed session for a briefing on potential Y2K
problems involving national security and classified
information.
"Congress wants to be known as somebody who gets under
the hood of the car and fixes things,"said lack Pitney, a
political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in
Claremont.
To paraphrase former New York Mayor Fiorello La
Guardia's observation about street cleaning,there is no
Republican or Democratic way to fix a computer.And there
seldom comes along an issue so easy for both parties to rally
around,as evidenced by the bipartisan love-felt displayed at
various conferences this week touting Y2K bills—a notable
http://www.latimes.com/HOMF./NEWS/ASECTlON/t000017988.html 2/26/99
I-or Image-Hamereo Longress, V 11S problem(,cold Utter a Halm page i of J
shift from the recent acrimony over impeachment.
"Rational politicians are looking for something they can
accomplish, that President Clinton won't veto, that doesn't
cause a government shutdown so they can say they enacted
something with bipartisan support," Pinkerton said. "And Y2K
reform is like the metric system--it seems like a good idea,
everybody's for it,nobody really understands it and you assume
somebody else is going to handle it.The average voter stuck on
the 405 Freeway would say,'Yes,that's what they should be
doing."' Beyond actual legislation,Congress has been working
steadily to make sure the federal government--among the
nation's largest computer users—attends to its housekeeping.
Rep. Stephen Horn(R-Long Beach),who chairs the House
subcommittee investigating the year 2000 problem,has issued
seven report cards grading the federal government on its
progress toward Y2K compatibility. Last week he gave it a C-
plus.
Covering the Bases
And although Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan
has cautioned consumers against making extra-large pre-New
Year's bank withdrawals because they fear automated teller
failures,the Fed plans to stockpile an extra$200 billion in cash
just in case, about one-third more than usual.
In the end,many of the gestures and legislation by Congress
probably will be symbolic--a lot of the bills simply will not
pass. And it is possible that, if all this worry turns out to be for
naught,America will wake up Jan. 2 with a dozen or so laws it
does not need.
"In which case," Pitney said, "smart members of Congress
will stand up and declare success."
Copyriaht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
CONGRESS(_U.S.),20OYEAR,COMPUTERS,LEGISLATI N!--
UN D TATES,UNITED STATES POLITICS.Yo—u wit n be
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
ews ooISite index + eo
http:/Avww.latimes.00m/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000017988.html 2/26/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register
Babbitt quits city-farm water talks
NEGOTIATIONS: The does not signal the onset of yet In recent years,thanks to offi-
interior secretary's de- another Western water war," cisl "surpluses" declared by
said a letter from Babbitt to the Babbitt, the MWD has been si-
eision is seen as less- head of the Metropolitan Water phoning several hundred thou-
enin hopes for a deal. District,with copies to all sides. sand acre-feet more than its
B P The giant MWD,wholesaler to share from the river, pushing
The Auoriated tress 16 million Southern Californians, California's take as high as
has been negotiating with the Im. S.2 million acre-feet. _
LOS ANGELES—Water nego- pedal Irrigation District and the Babbitt has repeatedly warned
tiations between Southern Cali- Coachella Valley Water District the state to start drinking within
for s's major city and farm sup- over issues such as how much its means and has threatened to
ter rInterior ruSecretary B Bruce m der yeareach shouldand
who,especially pay stop declaring surpluses — a
Secretary hi years,and who should pay move that could reduce urban
Babbitt said is ute no longer to ship and store r water supplies drastically—un-
mediate the dispute. Under a lure agreement, Cali- Tess California comes up with a
Babbitt, who controls
water the forma is assuredfrom
the
I- general plan to curb Colorado
slate's allocation r, water from feet of water a year from the Col- River ase.
the Colorado River,has suggest- orado. However, only S50,000 Babbitt's letter came just two-
ad he might reduce California's acre-feet is budgeted for the pop-
take If the
talks fad. He encour- ulous coastal strip and booming days after he got a letter from
aged both sides to keep negotiat- inland regions via [he MWD. MWD Chairman Phillip J. Pace
Mg. The bulk, 3.SS million acre that questioned, as a matter of
It appears to me that the par- feet,is spilt among irrigation di. "public policy," the notion that
ties, having come so close to tricts to the Imperial, Coachella farmers should be allowed to re
agreement in January, are now and Palo Verde valleys of south- sell publicly subsidized water to
drifting apart. I truly hope this eastern California. cities at a markup.
orange Lounty Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper I Section I Page # I Date subject IJ
Los Angeles Times
Clouds Over the Water
dh its aggressive clam to addi- action," declared one irate farm leader. Bab-
tional supplies from the Colorado bitt said he had nosuch power in any event.
River,the Metropolitan Water Dis- The action comes during a transition at
trict of Southern California risks a water war Metropolitan. Phillip J. Pace of Montebello
that could doom promising efforts to solve has taken over as chairman while the board
the state's most critical water problems. In a searches for a general manager to succeed
stroke, the giant water wholesaler has John Woodraska, who resigned last fall. At
brought down the wrath of fanners, the fed- the same time, a state Senate committee
eral government and legislative critics who chaired by Sen. David Kelley (R-Idyllwild)
are considering a restructuring—and prob- has resumed its hearings into management
able weakening—of the agency. and oversight of the MWD. Kelley told a re-
Superficially,the MWD's action seems con- cent hearing that MWD actions over the past
sistent with its major goal:to assure Southern several years "have cast doubt on the ability
California a reliable long-range water supply of MWD's management and board of direc-
and, with it, sound economic growth. But in tors to properly carry out their duties."
fact it may be counterproductive. The regi- Metropolitan may have a legitimate con-
on's water future could be tied up in the cern that Imperial is wasting water and is try-
courts for years or even be taken over by the ing to sell its water at inflated prices. More-
state. over, Metropolitan officials believe that
Tensions reached such a high point that In- everyone with a water deal is interested only
tenor Secretary Bruce Babbitt broke off his in the MWD's deep pockets.
efforts to mediate water allocation issues If there is waste, it must be stopped. And
among the MWD,the Imperial Irrigation Dis- it's in the interests of afl to have an open,
trict and the Coachella Valley Irrigation Dis- competitive water market in California. But
trict. Normally a patient man, the ensper MWD officials are mistaken if they believe
ated Babbitt was issuing a wake-up call to they can get more water from the Colorado
MWD officials. River merely by demanding it. The proper
The breakdown was precipitated by an worse is to return to the negotiating table.
MWD suggestion that Babbitt use his powers The MWD board's more urgent priority
as Colorado River water master to "pursue a should be to find the best possible general
more appropriate allocation" to meet the dir manager and not to burden him or her with
trict's future needs. That is a benign way of micromanaging and the kinds of policies that
saying the district wants to take same of the have divided the West's water world into Op-
water that historically has gone to agriculture posing camps. Metropolitan needs a visionary
and instead supply it to the cities. The idea professions£ who can heal the agency's
was received with hostility by the farmers, wounds and put it on a solid, consistent
who view their right to 75% of California's worse. With anything less, the MWD is
Colorado River supply as sacred. "A warlike headed for more trouble.
r
CALIFORNIA 0M
San aemardino
Las Angel" • CokradoApuetlu,%
Riveraltla ARIZONA
u✓"~' San Dfogo Colin tl
�PoclBe Oay�. A9aedacf Coachella Valley Rher
N,D W rL)K I blCAt-M ragc r ur .
aW6_ GO le It e%
II • I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP?
They sold their house
for HOW much I?
l ucscFt%, cl ruary 10. 191
NEWPORTBEACH
By JENIFER RAGLAND, (949)374-4232
rvine Ranch Water District board members have agreed
RELATED Jto move forward with a revised Wetlands Water Supply
project, one they say will result in less reclaimed water
O.C.SECTIONS and harmful substances in Upper Newport Bay. The new
MAIN PAGE project calls for an improved pumping station that will divert
San Diego Creek water through a series of duck ponds near the
NEWS BY district's treatment plant.
Cif ITY The public is invited to a March 4 meeting at the district's
SPORTS offices in Irvine to voice opinions on what should be included
in an environmental report on the project.
PREPSPORTS
BUSINESS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
SO CAL LIVING 3 Search the archives of the Los AngaI s Times for similar stories about:
CALENDAR IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT WATERUTILITIES—
NEWPORT BEACH(CA),UPPER NEWPORT BAY.You will not be
CALENDAR charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
I t
A
PEPPERDINE
MBA
http://www.latixnes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000014640.1.html 2/17/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register
NEWPORT BEACH
The public got a chance Thum
day to examine the Irvine
Ranch Water District's nely
wetlands plan.The plan
would cleanse San Diego
Creek water by diverting it
through the San Joaquin
Wildlife Sanctuary before it
goes to the Upper Bay. It
also mixes reclaimed water
with reservoir water,a mix
that would only overflow
into the bay in heavy rains.
Two residents examining
the plan expressed concerns
about viruses and other TUSTIN
pathogens in the recaimed water But Ken Thompson, PlanningCommissioner Paul
.
the district's water quality Jones will step down from
director, said any pathogens that position to avoid any
would be extremely small possible conflict of interest
and closely monitored,and with his new job as general
the overall water quality manager of the Irvine
would be greatly improved. Ranch Water District.Jones
—John Wacnwc, was appointed to the two-
(71a)9533239 year term as commissioner
in June 1998.The City Coun-
cil will di=ss how it plans
to replace him at its March
15 meeting.
—George Stewart
(714)565-6785
McIntyre, Donald
From: Miles, Patrick
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 6:53 PM
To: Y2K Steering Committee
Cc: Information Technology; EMT
Subject: State Computers 75% Free of Y2K Problems
In case you missed this article in today's LA Times.
"On Wednesday,Davis ordered a halt to any state government computer project not related to the Y2K problem.
He also assigned a new high-level team of state and private experts to oversee the repairs and—just in case they fail--
ordered disaster officials to prepare a contingency plan.
Davis officials said they hoped to pay for some of the remaining repairs by halting state Computer projects that do not
involve Y2K problems. But they said they had not determined how much money would ultimately be needed."
Click here for the full story:
hhD:/Mw latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/STATEA000015169.1.html
Thanks,
Patrick S. Miles
DirMor or Information Technology
Orange County Sarfthon District
(714)593-7290
(714)34 IMPagw
pmiles�ocstl.com
1
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 1 of 10
Ready to
n
ClaxiheA 4Ae ' YeIlmvPayef `
Web Archive
1 Search Again ) eagvnghr o 19se The seam Times comp, y
Local News : Sunday, January 17, 1999
1 Browse by Date
Millions for new sewage plant, and
nobody's making a stink
by Ross Anderson
Seattle Times staff reporter
Within a few weeks, the Metropolitan King County
Council is expected to vote on a mammoth, $1.1 billion
sewer project, including a $400 million state-of-the-art
sewage-treatment plant north of Lake Washington.
They will do this despite years of warnings from
scientists that the new plant is not needed and that
advanced sewage treatment will be a waste of millions.
But when science clashes with public opinion, science
usually loses. And it may be happening again amid the
labyrinthian sewers of Puget Sound.
County officials insist the project is necessary - if only
because state and federal laws require it, and because
taxpayers want it. Judging by a 1997 county opinion poll,
they're right: People demand that Puget Sound be
cleaned up and are willing to pay for it.
But many scientists say secondary treatment does not
significantly improve water quality in the oxygen-rich
currents of central Puget Sound.
They cite a 1993 study by the prestigious National
Academy of Science that concluded secondary treatment
is critical for landlocked areas but that for seaport cities
like Seattle, it amounts to environmental overkill.
http:l/www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 2 of 10
Alan Mearns, a biologist and an expert on marine
pollution, worked on that study and wishes county
officials would read it. "Just take a little time to educate
yourself before you spend all that money on high-level
treatment," he pleads.
Even better, the county should look at what ratepayers
got for their new, $575 million secondary-treatment plant
at West Point, he says. After three years of operation,
officials concede they can't point to any resulting
improvement in Puget Sound's water quality.
Still, backers of the new secondary-treatment plant
remain adamant. "People don't want sewage in Puget
Sound," says County Councilman Larry Phillips, who
chairs the committee that recently approved the plan.
"Unless the study recommended going to secondary
treatment, I probably would not read it."
Adds Don Theiler, manager of the county Wastewater
Treatment Division: "I support secondary treatment. This
department supports it. Everybody who lives on Puget
Sound supports it."
And soon everybody will begin paying for it - as much as
$26 per month added to sewer bills over the next 35
years.
At $1.1 billion, the "regional wastewater services plan"
will be one of the costliest capital projects in local
history. It calls for nearly $700 million in new sewer
pipes and other technology, plus the new treatment plant
at an undetermined site north of Lake Washington.
That is more than the combined cost of both new sports
stadiums. And these costs can't be foisted onto hotel
bills or rental cars.
Yet, to date, the only squabbling has been over where
the new plant should be built. For policymakers, staff,
most media and even many scientists, the need for
advanced sewage treatment is an article of faith. With
salmon runs dwindling throughout the region, cleaning
up Puget Sound, area lakes and rivers is a high priority.
You gotta do what you gotta do.
And environmental laws seem to leave little question
what King County has to do.
http://www.seaflletimes.com/ 1/20199
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 3 of 10
By the early 1970s, Americans were outraged by the
pollution of their lakes, rivers and bays. The Great Lakes
were turning into cesspools. Ohio's Cuyahoga River was
so polluted it actually caught fire.
Most cities, including Seattle, had primary treatment,
which uses screens and settling tanks to remove solids,
grit, scum and debris from effluent.
The 1972 Clean Water Act, marked as the first big
victory for the environmental movement, required all
cities to add secondary treatment, a biological process
that uses bacteria to consume biodegradable material in
the effluent before returning it to the environment. And
Congress promised to pay 75 percent of the costs,
which, for a while, it did.
As a result, more than $76 billion has been spent on new
or expanded sewage treatment around the nation. For
most cities, the returns have been dramatic. Dozens of
rivers have been cleaned up, and the Great Lakes are
greatly improved.
The Seattle area had been struggling over its sewers for
years. Lake Washington had become so polluted by the
1950s that lakeshore communities organized a regional
consortium called Metro to construct a sewer system
around the lake, diverting waste water to primary
treatment plants in Magnolia and Renton.
For many years, Metro officials resisted secondary
treatment, arguing that it cost millions more to build and
operate, while consuming more energy and water.
Then, as now, the argument was that the technology
needed to clean up Lake Erie or Lake Washington may
not be needed in Puget Sound.
Here's why: Primary-treated sewage is made up mostly
of water, with less than one-tenth of 1 percent
suspended solids, organic matter and traces of other
contaminants, mostly phosphorus and nitrogen.
In a confined body of water, those so-called "nutrients"
essentially overfertilize the water, encouraging the
growth of tiny organisms that, in turn, consume too much
oxygen and degrade the water quality. That's what
happened to Lake Washington in the 1950s and to
isolated bays in south Puget Sound in the 1970s and
1980s.
http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1120/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 4 of 10
1980s.
For those bodies of water, the solution was secondary
treatment, in which bacteria consume and digest much of
the biodegradable solids.
But central Puget Sound is different, Mearns and others
argue. It contains about 1 trillion cubic meters of water.
Massive tides flush the system twice per day; the daily
outflow from Puget Sound is twice that of the Columbia
River.
As a result, all that phosphorus and nitrogen are quickly
diluted - 1 to 100 within seconds, 1 to 1,000 within
minutes.
For many people, this is no consolation. "It leaves me
cold that people say: Don't worry, because it's
dispersed," says Kathy Fletcher, of the environmental
group People for Puget Sound. 'That's irresponsible."
But others insist those nutrients actually fertilize the
Sound, providing food for phytoplankton, which feed
zooplankton, which feed small fish, which feed bigger
fish, and so forth.
In fact, the tons of solids removed from sewage, at a cost
of millions per year, are recycled into "biosolids" and
sold as a valuable fertilizer. County officials proudly
report that trees on the popular Mountains-to-Sound
Greenway grow much faster when fertilized with their
recycled sewage.
Treated sewage also contains trace amounts of copper,
zinc, lead and other metals that, when concentrated, can
have a toxic effect on the environment. Primary
treatment removes some of those metals, but secondary
removes more than twice as much.
In the early years, Metro argued that such pollutants in
primary sewage are a tiny fraction of those introduced ,
from industrial sites, ship traffic and natural sources.
Whatever the source, these pollutants are also quickly
diluted in Puget Sound.
So goes the argument. For a time, the federal
government agreed. Metro was given a waiver from
secondary treatment.
But in the early '80s, the public became alarmed by
hftp://www,seaftletimes.com/ 1/20/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 5 of 10
But in the early '80s, the public became alarmed by
Puget Sound pollution. Scores of shellfish beds were
closed in the south Sound. Several gray whales washed
up on Northwest beaches, dead from unknown causes.
Bottom fish were found with tumors caused by feeding in
poisoned sediments. The health of Puget Sound became
an issue in the 1984 election.
Under growing public pressure, the state passed new
Puget Sound protections. People demanded that King
County upgrade its sewage treatment. Metro relented
and promised to build a new secondary-treatment plant.
'Whether we needed it or not'
Essentially, politics prevailed over science, recalls
Gordon Gabrielson, the retired former manager of
Metro's West Point plant.
"We knew that we weren't doing any harm to the Sound,
because that's what all the scientists told us. So I went
along with the decision to build it, whether we needed it
or not."
Many scientists were astounded by the decision, recalls
Lincoln Loehr, an oceanographer who works as an
environmental analyst for a Seaftle law firm. A petition,
signed by 30 of the top oceanographers and biologists at
the University of Washington, warned that secondary
treatment would be a waste of money.
One of those scientists was Alan Mearns, the soft-
spoken biologist who specializes in water pollution at the
Seattle office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration at Sand Point.
"We were trying to say: Let's think about how we're
spending public funds," he recalls. "Let's see which
strategies result in benefits, and which don't. And the
scientific evidence suggested that secondary would not
get us results."
For public officials, it is relatively easy to build sewage ,
projects, adds Loehr, because they can be financed
without raising taxes. Local utilities simply raise sewer
fees and spread the costs among thousands of
ratepayers. Everybody-the Microsoft millionaire or the
welfare mom - pays, and nobody has any choice.
So, three years ago, Metro opened the valves on its
brand new secondary-treatment plant at West Point. The
http://www.seaftletimes.com/ 1/20199
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 6 of 10
brand new secondary-treatment plant at West Point. The
price tag was about $575 million; with interest on the
debt, the ultimate cost will be well over $1 billion.
'The message was clear'
Even before that plant was finished, voters decided to
merge King County and Metro, which was already
planning the next stage of secondary treatment.
"Expanding West Point did not add capacity," explains
Christie True, a program manager in the county
Wastewater Division. "We needed to make long-term
decisions to prepare for the future."
The effort focused on fast-growing suburbs in north King
and south Snohomish counties, much of which are
hooked to King County sewers. Sewage from that area is
piped as far as 13 miles to the Renton plant for
treatment, and those pipes are nearly at capacity, True
said.
The Wastewater Division prepared a set of alternatives.
The county could expand the existing plants, or spend
several hundred million dollars more to build a new one
up north.
The idea of obtaining a federal waiver and not adding
secondary treatment was never on the table.
"We went out and interviewed community leaders;" True
says. "And the message was clear: Water quality is a
high priority. Don't reopen past decisions. Don't consider
costs."
In the 1997 poll, large majorities said they viewed Puget
Sound pollution as a major problem and said they would
pay higher sewer rates to prevent it.
However, those polled were never told there is any
debate over the environmental benefits of secondary
treatment.
Last year, County Executive Ron Sims came out with his
preferred plan: Upgrade and expand the sewer system
and build new storage tanks to prevent storm-related
overflows - improvements that nobody contests. And he
called for a new secondary-treatment plant, pumping the
effluent across the North End to a new outfall about six
miles away near Richmond Beach.
http://www.seafletimes.comf 1/20/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 7 of 10
Costs would be spread among all ratepayers, plus a stiff
surcharge for new hookups. For some ratepayers, that
would mean a relatively modest rate increase of about
$2.50, True says. But County Council member Maggi
Fimia warns that the surcharge will boost sewer rates for
new homes or businesses by as much as $26 per month.
Flexibility urged
Meanwhile, the same federal government that required
secondary treatment was helping pay for a three-year
study by the National Academy of Science. That 430-
page report concludes the Clean Water Act can lead to
overprotection in coastal areas.
While researchers did not address Puget Sound
specifically, they urged that federal laws be made
Flexible enough to allow for geographical differences,
because advanced treatment may not be necessary at
all in the deep, tidal waters of the Pacific Coast.
As a result, more than 40 Western communities
including San Diego and Orange County, Calif., and the
state of Hawaii have obtained waivers from the Clean
Water Act.
"The problem with the Clean Water Act is that the U.S. is
not a homogenous place," says Elaine Brooks, a
plankton researcher who spent 20 years at the
prestigious Scripps marine research institution outside
San Diego. 'What worked well for Cleveland or Chicago
turns out to be a tremendous waste of money in San
Diego or Seattle."
As in Seattle, secondary treatment had enormous public
support in San Diego, Brooks says. Environmental
groups filed suit to force the issue, but the courts
ultimately ruled that San Diego didn't need secondary.
Sound 'is not the ocean'
King County officials reject any comparison with
Southern California. "Puget Sound is not the ocean,"
says Don Theiler, the waste-water manager. "I don't
think even the best scientists can know with any
certainty the effects of discharging primary effluent."
He and other officials acknowledge they never conferred
with California sewage authorities and never considered
http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 8 of 10
with California sewage authorities and never considered
requesting a waiver. '
In fact, Mearns and other critics say Puget Sound has
stronger currents for dilution, and far more oxygen for
natural treatment of sewage than the waters off Southern
California.
"The evidence suggests that Puget Sound has
tremendous depth and tidal action," says Blake
Anderson, an environmental engineer at Cal Poly
Pomona who worked on the Academy of Sciences study.
And the negligible benefits of advanced treatment, he
adds, may well be offset by the costs -not just dollars,
but also neighborhood impacts and the additional use of
water and energy.
Randy Shuman, an oceanographer who monitors water
quality for King County, stresses that secondary
treatment has reduced pollutants going into the Sound
from sewage by up to 75 percent, based on monitoring
at the West Point plant.
But has that really made much difference in the overall
health of Puget Sound?
A state monitoring program reports that Puget Sound
water quality has been improving steadily for many
years. But scientists differ over whether that
improvement can be attributed to secondary sewage
treatment.
-We can't detect a difference'
Once a month, Shuman and otherstest the waters at the
West Point outfall, but they frequently have trouble
finding any trace of the effluent "plume," he says.
And he concedes: 'We can't reliably detect a difference
since secondary."
This is because the outfall is in an ideal location, he '
says-240 feet deep and 3,600 feet from the shore in the
middle of powerful currents. At the bottom end is the
"diffuser' -600 feet of pipe riddled with 200 holes about
4 1/2 inches round -which ensures that the effluent
mixes quickly with sea water.
Incoming saltwater from the Pacific tends to flow south
near the bottom, because saltwater is heavier than fresh
water. The ouffall is strategically placed so that most of
http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 9 of 10
water. The outfall is strategically placed so that most of
the effluent enters the outgoing, northbound currents.
Still, Shuman feels better about reducing the amount of
nutrients and other pollutants in the effluent.
"I don't believe a wrong decision was made," he says. "I
would say the science were putting together suggests
that it is not obvious that secondary was a waste of
money. . . .
"For now, we have a job to do, and it is not a trivial thing
to challenge the Clean Water Act. Is that really what we
want to do?"
'Dare not talk about it'
Probably not. There is no groundswell, even among
scientists, to give up on secondary treatment.
Mearns and Loehr have spoken up at County Council
meetings, but theirs have been lonely voices for some
15 years.
Others are reluctant to speak up. Gabrielson, the former
West Point manager, says many of his former
colleagues - engineers and scientists alike - still believe
secondary treatment is a huge waste of money.
"But they dare not talk about it because they think it
would jeopardize their jobs," he says. "I'm retired, so
can talk about it."
It's not so much fear as the nature of scientists, adds
Jack Word, a biologist at Battelle who has worked with
sewage treatment in Puget Sound and Southern
California.
"Is secondary worth the money? Probably not. But
scientists can't say that with certainty. A policy maker
reaches a point where he has to make a decision. But
science is never finished. So you try not to be on one
side or the other of an issue, so other people can make
those decisions."
The billion-dollar sewer plan may not be a done deal.
Council members Fimia and Louise Miller, both from
north county districts, have heard from constituents who
don't want a sewage plant in their back yards. Fimia and
Miller prefer one of the less-costly options, which would
hltp://www.seaffletimes.com/ 1/20199
Seattle Times: Search Results Page 10 of 10
Miller prefer one of the less-costly options, which would
expand one or both of the existing treatment plants at '
Renton or West Point -far from their districts.
"As I see it, each of the strategies gives you the same
sewage capacity, so what is the additional benefit of
spending hundreds of millions for a North End plant?"
Fimia asks.
Once again, the issue is not science but public opinion.
And North End opinion says: Go ahead and build it. . . .
Somewhere else.
4 Search Again
Ross Anderson's phone number is 206-464-2061.
Browse by Me .._ .._ __............._...
—_.—......_......
Halkginggd and HeiAt(•.d Into.
� King CounNs fle91ona1 Westewa�er_g m�ce�Plan
FREE Click here
llle Early Bird gets the... POCO COMBO for details
t Cl91slrced Ads YNlOWN
CODytlghl O 1999 The Se Me I mes_CoW5_
http://www.seattletimes.com/ 1/20/99
a
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 24, 1999
o�NS ANITgl�
723. O�
2 � �
c 9
O y
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
OCSOe P.O.Box 8127* Fountain Valley,CA 927284127 0 (71{)992-2411
Minutes for Board Meeting
a 02/24/99
Page 2 of 6
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on February 24, 1999, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
A Peter Green Dave Garofalo
A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan - Thomas E. Lutz
X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F. Walker
X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
A Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; Patrick Miles; Bob
Ooten; Mike Petennan; Doug Stewart; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; John Linder, Chuck
Winsor, Ryal Wheeler
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Conrad Hohener; Warren Parchan
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/24/99 p
Page 3of6
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution
of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Eva Miner-Bradford for her
contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the District.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
The Chair discussed the Steering Committee Retreat held on February 20. Topics for
discussion at the retreat were organization issues and direction of the agency.
Chair Debay also reported that the Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee would be
meeting on March 10 to review the recommendations of staff and a special consultant who are
reviewing proposals regarding inflow and infiltration. The Committee will report their findings to
the OMITS Committee and the full Board in April.
A special Directors'Workshop is scheduled for Saturday, March 13, to review groundwater
reclamation issues as it relates to the strategic plan.
The FAHR Committee will also be holding a special workshop on Saturday,April 10, to discuss
proposed changes to the connection fee structure, and all Directors were encouraged to attend.
The Directors were then requested to complete a survey questionnaire included in their meeting
folders regarding Board meeting start times. Any change it the meeting time will be announced
prior to the March Board meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 27, 1999, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/99 10 /31/99
Totals $4,255,454.52 $3,728,740.45
Director Mark Leyes abstained.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
9. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the February 24, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
January 27, 1999 to be filed.
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/24/99
Page 4 of 6
10. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the
Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the February 4, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 4, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters
F and G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39-1, as complete, authorizing execution of
the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Olsson
Construction, Inc.
d. MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to
Ocean Oudall Reliability Upgrades, Job No.J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access,
SP19950003,with Advanco Constructors, Inc., authorizing an addition of
$133.279 increasing the total contract amount to$7,753,086; and (2)Accept
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access,
SP19950003, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion
and approving final closeout agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
e. MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and
specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract
No. 338-1. and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$4,200,000, for a total
budget of$10.125,000.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No.4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and
Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering
services in the amount of$109,860, for a total amount not to exceed $626,290.
11. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION,AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Thomas Saltarelli, Chair of the
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the February 10, 1999
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 10, 1999 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of January 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly
Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1998 through
December 31, 1998.
Minutes for Board Meeting
02/24/99 y
Page 5 of 6
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew boiler&machinery
insurance for the District for the period March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000, with
Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed
$71,286.00.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to retain
Moreland &Associates to conduct the independent audit of the District's annual
financial statements for an additional one-year period, and to issue Change
Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed $42,600.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize an 11.7% equity
adjustment to Danny Evangelista's salary to correct the internal and external
inequities that exist between Mr. Evangelista's salary and the salaries of other
Programmers.
In. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year
Report for the Quarter ended December 31, 1998.
I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services
Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance technical assistance
to complete embedded systems assessment, reparation, and testing not to
exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999.
Director Mark Murphy abstained.
j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize payment of$10,400 to
EK Development Corporation for a second month's additional payment in
connection with the option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kern County.
12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and award
Sewer Line Cleaning Agreement to Hoffman Southwest Corp. dba Professional Pipe
Services for the cleaning of approximately 175 miles of small diameter sewer lines in
Revenue Area 7, for Sewer Line Cleaning, Specification No. M-062, for an amount not to
exceed $227,115.00 for a one-year period with option for two one-year renewal periods.
13. Warren Parchan of Secured Property Management was recognized who spoke to the
Directors regarding his request to waive or reduce residential capital facilities connection
fees in connection with a senior citizen apartment project in the City of Placentia. After
discussion among the Directors, it was:
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file letter submitted by
Secured Property Management dated February 15, 1999; (2) Receive and file memo
from General Counsel dated February 12, 1999; and (3) Deny the request of Secured
Property Management to waive or reduce residential capital facilities connection fees.
Director Norm Eckenrode abstained.
Minutes for Board Meeting
v 02/24/99
Page 6 of 6
14, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R,
and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract
No. 3-11 R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Reject all bids;
and (4)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for
Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal
Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid).
15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve out-of-country travel by Jane
Tran to attend the Printed Circuit Board Wastewater Technologies Conference being
held in Taiwan to present her technical paper, for one week in March 1999; and all
travel, lodging, registration and per diem costs to be paid by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Find that the following matter arose
subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code
Section 54954.2(b)(2); and authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed
for an existing sewer easement located in the City of Fullerton in connection with
Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation
Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and a subsidiary of Unocal
Corporation, in a forth approved by General Counsel.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:
The Board convened in closed session at 7:45 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved
action becomes final re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1) and 16(a)(3). No reportable action was
taken re Agenda Item No. 16(a)(2). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 16(a)(4), and
no report was given.
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 8:15 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
There were no actions taken during the closed session that must be reported out at this time.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
ecretary of Board of" irectors of
Orange Cou Sanllatl District
Wadon\dalal\wp.cftMagendalBoard MinNes\1999 Board MinNm\022499doc
Claims Paid From IM199 to 111W119
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
16473 Brown And Caldwell 8 121,457.75 Engineering Services P1-37
16474 Canus Corporation 88,737.67 Fiber Optic Cable
16475 Carollo Engineers 39,229.47 Engineering Services P1-36&P2-42
16476 CH2MHill 94,470.58 Engineering Services J-31-3
16477 Dell Marketing L.P. 61.039.32 10 Dell Computer Workstations&9 Dell Notebook Computers
16478 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 81,090.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98
16479 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 72,488.10 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
16480 Intergraph Corporation 36,732.58 Software J-42
16481 Parsons Engineering Science 117,06.18 Engineering Services J-42
16482 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 82,305.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16483 Science Applications In6.,Corp. 40.507.62 Ocean Monitoring MO6-8-94
16484 Southern California Edison 46.243.00 Power
16485 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 67,155.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16486 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 76,030.20 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5
16487 First Fire Systems,Inc. 63.826.28 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25.98
16488 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 138,209.73 Construction 7-17
16489 Margate Construction,Inc. 209,211.00 Construction PI-36-2
16490 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 227.319.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
r�r 16491 The Vantage Group LLC 1,830.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
y 16492 AT&T 25.89 Long Distance Telephone Services
16493 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.85 Long Distance Telephone Services
16494 American Telephone&Telegraph 477.31 Long Distance Telephone Services
16495 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 594.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16496 Airborne Express 54.00 Air Freight
16497 Allied Supply Company 4,075.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16498 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 144.58 Instrument Supplies
16499 American Airlines 1,870.00 Travel Services
16500 Anixter, Inc. 247.93 Computer Supplies
16501 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 696.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
16502 Appleone Employment Service 10.768.29 Temporary Employment Services
16503 Annor-Vac 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16504 Audio Video Reporting Services 139.31 Audio Video Services
16505 Awards&Trophies By Bea 78.33 Plaques
16506 Azur Environmental 1,250.19 Lab Supplies
16507 Assoc.of Metro. Sewerage Agencies 475.00 Meeting Registration
16508 ASR Analysis 1,200.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1
16509 AWSI 229.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
16510 Baker Process 12.935.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16511 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,625.20 Telephone Installation
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16612 Battery Specialties 110.07 Batteries
16513 Belisle&Associates 150.80 Publications
16514 Bernardo Press 157.85 Publications
16515 Bio Gro Division 17,566.48 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
16516 Black Box Corporation 275.04 Computer Supplies
16517 Brinderson Corp 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
16518 Bristol Systems, Inc. 11.012.08 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
16519 Burke Engineering Co. 91579 Electrical Supplies
16520 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,91200 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97
16521 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 91 15 Rope
16522 Calif Centrifugal Pump 5.67600 Pump Supplies
16523 California Automatic Gate 2.15756 Service Agreement
16524 California Relorafion Services 312.00 Moving Services
16525 Calolympic Safety 17.97 Safety Supplies
16526 CalTrans-Publicafion Unit 92.00 Publications
16527 Center for Effective Performance,Inc. 110.00 Office Supplies
16628 Charles King Company, Inc. 4,472.43 Construction 541-1
VW 16529 Charles P.Crowley Co. 641.55 Instrument Parts
ri 16530 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,N.A. 10.502.00 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
r'* 16531 Chrome Crankshaft Co. 1.015.00 Pump Supplies
b 16532 Cole Scientific 208.23 Lab Services
Ni 16533 Communication Briefings 89.00 Publications
16534 Compuserve Incorporated 24.95 Computer Services
16635 Computers America, Inc. 1.804.42 Computer Supplies
16536 Connell GM Parts 10.51 Truck Supplies
16537 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,555.14 Electrical Supplies
16538 Consolidated Plastics Company 21.60 Welding Equipment&Supplies
16539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 204.90 Plumbing Supplies
16540 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9,071.83 Engine Supplies
16541 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
16542 Corporate Express Imaging 306.05 Computer Supplies
16543 Corporate Express 749.89 Office Supplies
16544 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 1,775.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09
16545 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 54.68 Truck Parts
16546 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1.649.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16547 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4.843.61 Electrical Supplies
16548 Crane Pro Services 5,049.44 Maintenance Agreement
16549 CHEMetrics, Inc. 26.12 Lab Supplies
16550 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 470.00 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer
16551 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 159.47 Lab Supplies
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1/15199
Warrant No. vendor Amount Description
16552 CR&R Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals
16553 D B Sales 7,973.50 Electrical Supplies
16554 Dapper Tire Co. 2,508.97 Truck Tires
16555 Del Mar Analytical 380.00 Biosolids Analysis
16556 Dover Elevator Company 2,925.30 Elevator Maintenance
16557 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 699.13 Paint Supplies
16558 DMG-Maximus 15,960.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
16559 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
16660 Enterprise Technologies 8,588.00 Consulting Services-PIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project
16561 Environmental Resources Associates 910.20 Lab Services
16562 Environmental Data Solutions Group 9,800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into. Mgmt.Sys.Implementation Project
16563 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.302.12 Professional Services-Legislative
16564 ESP Industries.Inc. 1.084.87 Mechanical Supplies
16565 Federal Express Corp. 261.80 Air Freight
16566 Filter Supply Company 468.73 Fillers
16567 FirstAmerican Real Estate Solutions 136.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription
16568 Fisher Scientific 533.62 Lab Supplies
16569 Flickinger Company 151.59 Valve
16570 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 8.102.60 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium
r�r 16571 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 139.50 Truck Wash Tickets
q 16572 Franklin Covey 340.51 Training Registration&Office Supplies
w 18573 Fred Pryor Seminars 469.00 Training Registration
16574 Fry's Electronics 1,532.06 Computer Supplies
16575 Ganahl Lumber Company 1.615.11 Lumber/Hardware
16576 GTE California 1,087.16 Telephone Services
16577 Government Insglutes, Inc. 392.00 Publications
16578 Grace Huener 1.800.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation
16579 W W Grainger,Inc. 273.15 Compressor Supplies
16580 Graybar Electric Company 1,863.81 Electrical Supplies
16581 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 380.73 Janitorial Supplies
16582 GLI International, Inc. 1,844.64 Instrument Supplies
16583 Harbour Engineering Group 19,131.89 Pump Supplies
16584 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4.014.67 Truck Supplies
18585 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Dell 134.95 Catering Services
16586 Highway Products 5,114.28 Tool Boxes
16587 Hilti,Inc. 946.01 Tools
18588 The Holman Group 731.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium
16589 Hopkins Technical Products 248.74 Pump Supplies
16590 Horizon Technology 154.62 Lab Supplies
16591 How Magazine 34.96 Subscription
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16592 Hub Auto Supply 268.44 Truck Parts
16593 City of Huntington Beach 13.260.83 Water Use
16594 Hydrotex 1,749.82 Lube Oil
16595 HWA Sales, Inc. 3,252.76 Electdwl Supplies
16596 Imaging Plus, Inc. 630.51 Office Supplies
16597 Impulse 170.61 Mechanical Supplies
16598 Industrial Steam 438.46 Electrical Supplies
16599 Infilco Degremont Inc. 159.10 Mechanical Parts
16600 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service
16601 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 107.52 Lab Supplies
16602 Irvine Ranch Water District 17.82 Water Use
16603 IBM Corporation 3.912.12 Service Contract
16604 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
16605 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.684.10 Safety Supplies
16806 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 772.74 Instrument Supplies
16607 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 4.685.25 Training Expenses
16608 Jay's Catering 217.37 Catering Services
y 16609 Jensen Instruments Co. 657.79 Gauge
`T 16610 Johnstone Supply 767.16 Electrical Supplies
rah 16611 JTA Factors 688.75 Business Forms-Checks
b 16612 K.P. Lindstrom 5,750.00 Emir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
n 16613 Kembon Pacific,Inc. 7,697.96 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
16614 Kennedy Hydraulics 343.79 Motor Repairs
16615 Kimmede Bros., Inc. 580.96 Mechanical Parts
16616 Knox Industrial Supplies 1.068.60 Tools
16617 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 328.81 Safety Supplies
16618 Lee&Ro,Inc. 19,412.52 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
16619 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1.999.13 Cellular Telephone Service
16620 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.218.33 Welding Supplies
16621 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 180.93 Tools
16622 Medlin Controls Co. 4.620.44 Instrument Supplies
16623 Mesa Muffler 100.81 Truck Supplies
16624 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves
16625 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 3,578.66 HP LaserJet 8100DN Printer
16626 Mid-West Associates 6,208.60 Pump Supplies
16627 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,750.00 Mechanical Repairs
16628 Milfironics, Inc. 462.92 Electrical Supplies
16629 Mission Uniform Service 589.78 Uniform Rentals
16630 Montgomery Hardware Company 774.00 Door-Plant 2 Maint.Bldg.
16631 MotoPhoto 3.60 Photographic Services
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16632 MPS Photographic Services,Inc. 14.01 Photographic Services
16633 National Plant Services, Inc. 4,500.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16634 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 28.04 Publications 8 Books
16635 Voided Check - -
16636 Neal Supply Co. 1,005.20 Plumbing Supplies
16637 Newark Electronics 33.00 Instrument Supplies
16638 City of Newport Beach 59.98 Water Use
16639 Nextel Communications 1,154.45 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time
16640 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,504.81 Lubricant/Dlesel Fuel
16641 The Norco Companies 92.00 Mail Delivery Service
16642 NRDC Publications Department 13.75 Publication
16643 Office Depot Business Services 2,928.36 Office Supplies
16644 The Ohmart Corporation 516.26 Instrument Supplies
16645 Olympus America, Inc. 13,430.61 Videoimagescope 8 Accessories
16646 Oracle Education 3,333.00 Training Registration
16647 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,455.55 Electrical Supplies
16648 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1,347.20 Fittings
16649 Oxygen Service Company 2,391.83 Specialty Gases
r' 16650 OCB Reprographics 248.20 Printing Service-Spec P-173
r�r 16651 Pacific Bell 36.13 Telephone Services
y 16652 Pacific Mechanical Supply 114.99 Plumbing Supplies
yr 16653 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 278.32 Instrument Supplies
16654 Pacificare of Ca. 24,889.48 Health Insurance Premium
16655 Paco/Johnston Pump 361.96 Pump Supplies
16656 Padre Janitorial Supplies 64.65 Janitorial Supplies
16657 Pagenet 1,671.84 Rental Equipment
16658 Parts Unlimited 223.03 Truck Supplies
16659 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 189.90 Filters
16660 Pitney Bowes 2,240.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
16661 Pohydyne,Inc. 4,568.19 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16662 Power Probe 1,739.65 Electro Brake Bleeder w/Adaptors
16663 Prosum Information Technologies 2,923.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development
16664 Reliastar 8,048.00 Life Insurance Premium
16665 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,167.72 Life Insurance Premium
16666 RM Controls 256.93 Instrument Supplies
16667 RPM Electric Motors 12.966.61 Electric Motor Repair
16668 Safelite Glass Corp. 308.45 Auto Supplies
16669 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,774.74 Mechanical Supplies
16670 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment
16671 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 639.99 Specialty Gases
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16672 Sears 150.83 Mechanical Supplies
16673 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,344.99 Tools/Hardware
16674 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 12,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
16675 Skalar, Inc. 209.00 Pump Supplies
16676 SkillPath Seminars 399.00 Training Registration
16677 Snap-On Incorporated 32.37 Tools
16678 Southern California Water 56.55 Water Use
16679 Sparkletts 1,649.60 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
16680 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co. 93.52 Pump Supplies
16681 Stama Cells,Inc. 195.04 Lab Supplies
16682 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals
16683 Summit Steel 107.24 Metal
16684 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals
16685 Taylor-Dunn 30.08 Electric Can Parts
16686 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,068.98 Mechanical Supplies
16687 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
�I 16688 Tomell 8 Cotton 325.90 Legal Services
16689 Troemner,Inc. 766.78 Lab Equipment Calibration Services
16690 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 538.74 Truck Supplies
rr 16691 TEKsystems 2.915.00 Temporary Employment Services
Y 16692 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Lab Water Purification System Maint.
ON 16693 The Unisource Corporation 6,361.58 Paper Supplies
16694 United Parcel Service 959.27 Parcel Services
16695 Valcum 11,284.98 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
16696 Valley Cities Supply Company 917.08 Plumbing Supplies
16697 Verne's Plumbing 250.00 Plumbing Supplies
16698 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,394.10 Vision Service Premium
16699 Vortex Corp. 287.97 Door Repair
16700 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 9,589.14 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
16701 VWR Scientific Products 6,499.11 Lab Supplies
16702 Waxie Sanitary Supply 382.41 Janitorial Supplies
16703 Wayne Electric Co. 816.21 Electrical Supplies
16704 Weather Services International 3,459.00 Computer Software Service-Windows
18705 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 703.61 Safety Supplies
16706 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 1,992.40 Electrical Supplies
16707 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 15,581.74 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
16708 Wdeg Scientific 1.056.11 Lab Supplies
16709 Xerox Corporation 10,960.27 Copier Leases
16710 YCA 8 Associates 6.360.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees
16711 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications
Page 6 of 9 '•
vt
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16712 CNA Trust 8.447.80 Construction 5-41-1
16713 Blake Anderson 206.17 Cellular Expense Reimb.
16714 Rick J.Hannappel 557.00 Training Expense Reimb.
16715 County of Orange 2,235.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16716 Orange County Sanitation District 996.88 Petty Cash Reimb.
16717 Orange County Sanitation District 394,165.03 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
16718 WCO Hotels,Inc. 48.739.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16719 Aerochem,Inc. 5.10503 Reconol,aeon User Fee Refund
16720 Aluminum Forge 1,93698 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16721 Court Order 45515 Wage Garnishment
16722 Boeing North American 10771 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16723 Buena Park Community Hospital 66749 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16724 Cadillac Plating 501.96 Reconahation User Fee Refund
16725 Century Laminators#1 1,237.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16726 Claim Jumper Restaurant 549.56 DART Luncheon Expense
16727 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
r.� 16728 Columbia West Anaheim Medical 13.034.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
cam. 16729 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 56.20 Plumbing Supplies
16730 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
r�r 16731 CSMFO-1999 Annual Conference 665.00 Seminar Registration
b 16732 Delru Co. 186.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
�+ 16733 Details,Inc. 897.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16734 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
16735 Dunham Metal Processing 761.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16735 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
16737 Gunther Athletic Service 509.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16738 Hardly Able Oil Company 203.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16739 Hinckley and Schmitt 1,487.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16740 Huntington Beach Conv.Hospital 1,867.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16741 Imperial Containers&Display 173.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16742 Intercem 263.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16743 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
16744 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
16745 ICN Biomedicals 849.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16746 J.R.O.Operations Trust 230.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16747 Kaynar Mfg. Div.of Kaynar Tech. 2,085.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16748 Key Circuit Co. 2.346.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16749 Kinsbursky Brothers Supply,Inc. 75A6 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16750 Kryler Corporation 350.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund -
16751 KCA Electronics,Inc. 2,751.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16752 La Palma Intercommunity Hospital 2,465.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16753 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 51.16 Safety Supplies
16754 Lacey Custom Linens 131.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16755 LDR 123.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16756 Matrix Circuits, Inc. 410.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16757 Metal Technology,Inc. 780AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16758 Micrometals, Inc.#2 2.441.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16759 Monarch Precision Deburring Co. 362.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16750 Murrietta Circuits 1,184.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16761 Nutrilite Products, Inc. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16762 Omni Metal Finishing 1.757.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16763 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
16764 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
16765 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 234.91 Fittings
16766 OCEA 606.36 Dues Deduction
16767 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 337.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16768 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
16769 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
16770 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
rt 16771 Polydad Laminates, Inc. 330.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
q 18772 Ricoh Electronics 1.063.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
a 16773 Ristorante Mamma Gina 50.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16774 REG Transport Dynamics 292.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16775 Semicoa 183.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16776 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,065.26 Tools/Hardware
16777 Sodn Biomedical 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16778 Speedy Circuits 236.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16779 State of California 136.04 Wage Garnishment
16780 Taormina Industries,Inc.#4 345.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16781 Tayco Engineering 4.495.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16782 Thermco Systems,Inc. 1,808.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16783 U.S. Filter Corporation 286.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16784 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 314.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16785 Union Foods 1,238.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16786 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions
16787 Universal Circuits,Inc. 2.210.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16788 UOP P0#15224613 1,384.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16789 US Postal Service 505.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16790 US Postal Service 232.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16791 Val Circuits#5 1,368.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 8 of 9 4
s,
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16792 Valet Car Wash 531.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16793 Willamette Industries, Inc. 3,079.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,773,595.75
Payroll Disbursements
12375-12379 Employee Paychecks $ 106,287.29 Severance Payoffs
12380-12520 - Employee Paychecks 183.686.27 Biweekly Payroll 1113/99
12521-12522 Employee Paychecks 1,688.02 Termination&Payroll Adjustment
12523-12544 Directors'Paychecks 5.248.64 Payroll 1/13199
12545-12645 Employee Paychecks 1,377.58 Reissue Voided Auto Deposit
34202-34644 Direct Deposit Statements 617,134.66 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 916,322.46
Wire Transfer Payments
Texas Commerce Bank $ 151,579.61 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Texas Commerce Bank 226,958.62 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
rn State Street Bank&Trust 187,998.08 January Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
�C Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 568,536.31
w
P
Total Claims Paid 1/1199-1/15199 $ 4,255,454.52
Y
e
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
16794 Anna L. Piercy $ 340.00 Director Travel Advance
16795 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 45,803.60 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
16796 Carollo Engineers 29,724.67 Engineering Services Pi-36&P242
16797 Cummins Cal Pacific, Inc. 124,720.63 (2)200 KW Emergency Generators w/Trallers
16798 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 76,704.15 Engineering Services 241
16799 James Martin&Co. 108,682.50 Data Integration Project
16800 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 144,035.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95
16801 Orange County Water District 42.595.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
16802 Pacificare of Ca. 33,622.26 Health Insurance Premium
16803 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 170.031.19 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16804 Polydyne, Inc. 39.011.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3A1-92
16805 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 35,025.23 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94
16806 Southern California Edison 31.441.69 Power
16807 SPEC Services, Inc. 96,434.92 Engineering Services J-33-1
16808 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 92,467.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16809 United HealthCare 129.809.32 Medical Health Insurance
16810 Valcom 29.781.35 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
p 16811 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 73,691.92 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
M 16812 Water Environment Research Foundation 69,000.00 Membership
16813 Western States Chemical, Inc. 26,827.64 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
16814 The Vantage Group LLC 24,880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
16815 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.82 Long Distance Telephone Services
16816 American Telephone&Telegraph 2,106.01 Long Distance Telephone Services
16817 American Telephone&Telegraph 21.08 Long Distance Telephone Services
16818 AccuStandard 529.88 Lab Supplies
16819 Airgas Lyons Safety 310.42 Safety Supplies
16820 American Society of Civil Engineers' 2.254.50 Registration
16821 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 545.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
16822 Appleone Employment Service 11,746.28 Temporary Employment Services
16823 Applied Industrial Technology 662.13 Pump Supplies
16824 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies
16825 Annor-Vac 1,105.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16826 Arrs Disposal Service,Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
16827 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement
16828 Awards&Trophies By Bea 148.37 Plaques
18829 Azur Environmental 762.63 Lab Supplies
16830 ABM Business Machines.Inc. 1,1'13.06 Once Supplies
16831 ACT Group Inc. 487.13 Service Agreement
16832 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.592.81 Consulting Services 11-20
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Wammt No. Vendor Amount Description
16833 American Compensation Assoc. 930.00 Registration
16834 ARK Technologies 14.212.00 Data Processing
16835 Battery Specialties 1.386.36 Batteries
16836 Bic Gro Division 17,D48.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
16837 BioSource Consulting 11,553.73 Consulting Servicee-Biosolids&Watershed
16838 Boyle Engineering Corporation 15,924.94 Engineering Services 7-27
16839 Brinderson Corp 5W.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
16840 Bristol Systems, Inc. 6.150.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
16841 Bush&Associates, Inc. 11,090.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
16842 Business Objects Americas 4.972.85 Software-Data WhseAnlergration Project
16843 Business Week 37.95 Subscription
16844 BuyComp 22,908.48 Computer Supplies- 10 Network Switches
16845 BBR Surveying Instruments 111.40 Instrument Supplies
16846 CWEA 45.00 Membership
16647 Calolympic Safety 1,988.95 Safety Supplies
16848 Camali Corp 4.562.50 Service Agreement
16849 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 6,034.15 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-2
16850 Career Track Seminars MS2 696.00 Seminar Registration
16851 Centrepointe Commercial Inlerlors 583.88 Office Fumiture
N 16852 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,444.45 Professional Services-Ergonomic
16853 Color Ads, Inc. 530.00 Vehicle Decals
16854 Compressor Components Of Calif 6,141.75 Pump Supplies
16855 Computers America,Inc. 3,020.87 Computer Supplies
16856 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 478.46 Electrical Supplies
16857 Consolidated Plastics Company 95.40 Welding Equipment&Supplies
16858 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 226.14 Plumbing Supplies
16659 Converse Consultants 1,128.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
16860 Cooper Cameron Corporation 650.00 Engine Supplies
16861 Corporate Express Imaging 369.80 Computer Supplies
16862 Corporate Express 599.42 Office Supplies
16863 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09
16864 Cost Containment Solutions 702.56 Worker's Comp. Services
16865 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 46.14 Truck Parts
16866 County of Orange 74.57 Administrative Fees
16867 County of Orange 595.00 Permit Fees
16868 County of Orange 1,335.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16869 County Wholesale Electric Co. 32.16 Electrical Supplies
16870 Crane Pro Services 11,308.94 Maintenance Agreement
16871 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
16872 Cytec Industries, Inc. 15,477.66 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 1M6t99 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16873 CASA 205.00 Conference Registration
16874 CEPA Company 1.010.00 Equipment Maint.Service
16875 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 124.52 Lab Supplies
16876 CR&R, Inc. 2,205.00 Container Rentals
16877 CSMFO 40.00 Registration
18878 CWFA 115.00 Registration
16879 Dapper Tire Co. 80103 Truck Tires
16880 Datavault 21900 Oesue Back-Up Tape Storage
16881 DataCard Services 459 17 Egwpn,ent Maint
16882 David's Tree Service 45000 Tree Removal
16883 De Guelle&Sons Glass Co. 10633 Safety Glass
16884 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1.22400 Surveying Services MO 6.8.94
16885 DTSC 192.00 Hazardous Waste Fee
16886 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 74.00 Medical Screening
16867 Edison EV 7,100.48 EV Charging Station Installation
16888 Electra Bond, Inc. 1,203.57 Mechanical Supplies
111119 Electro Numerics, Inc. 257.00 Electrical Supplies
16890 Electro-Test, Inc. 904.00 Electrical Supplies
16891 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
n 16892 Enterprise Technologies 11,682.80 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project
16893 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.103.47 Professional Services-Legislative
w 16894 FIIeNET Corporation 15.731.51 Computer Software
16895 Fisher Scientific 1,292.00 Lab Supplies
16896 Flo-Systems,Inc. 7,466.98 Pump Supplies
16897 Forked Engineering&Surveying 9,840.00 Engineering Services P-150
16898 Franklin Covey 940.90 Office Supplies
16899 Fry's Electronics 152.89 Computer Supplies
16900 FM International,Inc. 1,000.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System
16901 GarraB-Callahan Company 560.30 Chemicals
16902 Gartner Group 395.00 Subscription
16903 Gales Fiberglass Installers 750.00 Fiberglass Repair
16904 GTE California 7.792.46 Telephone Services
16905 George T. Hall Co. 1.494.16 Mechanical Supplies
16906 Global Engineering&Management 3,690.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention
16907 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
16908 Grew Huener 2,430.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation
16909 WW Grainger, Inc. 57.43 Compressor Supplies
16910 Graphic Distributors 691.76 Photographic Supplies
16911 Graseby STI 4.305.07 Engine Supplies
16912 Great American Printing Co. 255.99 Printing Service
Page 3 of 9 m
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16913 GE Multilin Inc.(Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair
16914 GS Edwards Systems Technology 315.00 Lab Equipment Repair
16915 GST,Inc.I Micro City 33.84 Office Supplies
16916 GTE Hawaii 190.86 Telephone Services-3 Way Conference Call
16917 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 439.26 Truck Supplies
16918 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 68.00 Catering Services
16919 Home Depot 105.02 Small Hardware
16920 Hub Auto Supply 49.19 Truck Parts
16921 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 3.171.50 Software Licenses
16922 HWA Sales, Inc. 1,586.08 Electrical Supplies
16923 Imaging Plus, Inc. 708.53 Office Supplies
16924 Implemented Designs,Inc. 500.00 IT Computer Room Floor Refurbishing
16925 Impulse 211.74 Lab Supplies
16926 Industrial Air Compressor 286.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16927 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 26.03 Connectors
16928 Information Resources 200.00 Personnel Services
16929 Interstate Battery Systems 501.68 Batteries
16930 Irvine Ranch Water District 54.54 Water Use
16931 IBM Corporation 10,641.33 Service Contract
16932 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.889.27 Safety Supplies
16933 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 22,281.64 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
,> 16934 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 24,809.25 Misr.Construction Services
16935 Jays Catering 313.18 Catering Services
16936 Jobtrak 108.00 Notices&Ads
16937 Knowledge Point 1.608.75 Software Maint.Agreement
16938 Knox Industrial Supplies 559.36 Tools
16939 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 808.54 Cellular Telephone Service
16940 LaserAll Corp. 1,204A7 Service Agreement
16941 LaMotte Company 56.57 Sulfide Test Kit
16942 League of Co.Cities.Orange County Div. 95.00 Publications
16943 Lessons in Leadership 1.116.00 Seminar Registration
16944 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Publications
16945 Lieberi, Cassidy&Frierson 1,595.00 Membership
16946 Long Beach Line-X 357.38 Truck Supplies
16947 Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership
16948 JLM Gen.Contracting&Environmental 23,868.00 Manhole Repair
16949 Mar Vac Electronics 21.54 Instrument Supplies
16950 Martin McIntosh Land Surveying 10,609.45 Professional Services-Traffic Study
16951 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3,319.01 Valves
16952 Mc Junkin Corp. 209.28 Plumbing Supplies
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116/99 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16953 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 738.86 Toole
16954 Micro Motion, Inc. 1,152.77 Electrical Supplies
16955 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,961.89 Mechanical Repairs
16956 Mission Uniform Service 4,531.53 Uniform Rentals
16957 Moody's Investor's Service 5.000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
16958 Motion Industries 360.12 Pump Supplies
16959 Multiform Systems Corp. 1,875.00 Computer Equip.Services-Fuel Mgml. System
16960 MPS Photographic Services 16.17 Photographic Services
16961 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
16962 National Assoc.of Regional Councils 275.00 Registration
16963 National Microcomp Services 4,090.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
16964 National Technical Information 82.50 Publications
16965 Neal Supply Co. 2,220.46 Plumbing Supplies
16966 Network Solutions Group 980.00 Cable Installation Specification
16967 New Hermes, Inc. 595.31 Tools
16968 Newark Electronics 718.81 Instrument Supplies
16989 Nextel Communications 688.88 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time
16970 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 6,917.03 LubricenVDiesel Fuel
6' 16971 Ninyo 8 Moore 449.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
N 16972 Northwestern Carbon 1,389.55 Filters
roi 16973 O01ce Depot Business Services 1,429.59 Office Supplies
r+' 16974 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 196.00 Temporary Employment Services
16975 Orange County Sanitation District 19,768.54 Worker's Comp.Relmb.
16976 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 23.77 Plumbing Supplies
16977 Orange County Forum 300.00 Conference Registration
16978 Orange County Sanitation District 416.05 Petty Cash Relmb.
16979 Orange County Wholesale Electric 478.35 Sectdcal Supplies
16980 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 301.53 Fittings
16981 Oxygen Service Company 1,077.03 Specialty Gases
16982 OCB Reprographics 1,123.51 Printing Service-Spec P-173
16983 Pacific Bell 89.64 Telephone Services
16984 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1.151.50 Internet Services
16985 Pacific Mechanical Supply 388.39 Plumbing Supplies
16986 Pacific Publishers 30.78 Publication
16987 Pagenet 1.901.51 Rental Equipment
16988 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 665.59 Tires
16989 Pads Unlimited 741.60 Truck Supplies
16990 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 3,520.75 Filters
16991 Petco Animal Supplies 68.99 Lab Supplies
16992 Pinnacle One 34.32 Consulting Services 5-37-3
Page 5 of 9 e
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1/31199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16993 Power Bros. Machine,Inc. 815.36 Mechanical Maint.
16994 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin.
16995 Public Financial Management,Inc. 7,500.00 Arbitrage Consulting Services
16996 PC Magazine 54.97 Subscription
16997 PCS Express 99.00 Courier Service
16998 PIHRA 90.00 Membership
16999 R. L.Abbott&Associates 2,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
17000 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 414.06 Trash Removal
17001 Randolph Austin Co. 665.00 Lab Supplies
17002 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
17003 Regents of University of Calif. 330.00 Registration
17004 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1.286.41 Electrical Supplies
17005 Remedy 7.191.04 Temporary Employment Services
17006 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 450.00 Video Production Service
17007 RPM Electric Motors 296.31 Electric Motor Repair
17008 Safety-Kleen 840.00 Service Agreement
17009 Sand Dollar Business Forms 310.32 Printing Supplies
17010 SamaFe Industrial Products 466.46 Mechanical Supplies
17011 Sanorius Corporation 195.80 Publications
17012 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment
17013 Scutt Specialty Gases, Inc. 404.06 Specialty Gases
m 17014 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 3.748.00 Lab Repairs
17015 Seagate Software 6,916.46 Software Maint.Agreement
17016 Second-Sun 117.37 Light Fixtures
17017 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 707.53 Tools
17018 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,483.13 Tools/Hardware
17019 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 15.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
17020 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 1,286.74 Lab Supplies
17021 Skater, Inc. 271.00 Pump Supplies
17022 Snap-On Incorporated 130.57 Tools
17023 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.814.23 Natural Gas
17024 South Coast Water 10.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
17025 Sparkletts 2.094.02 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
17026 State Board of Equilization 445.16 Underground Storage Tank Fee
17027 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 624.00 Janitorial Supplies
17028 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4,879.01 COP Trustee Services
17029 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
17030 Summit Steel 1,797.58 Metal
17031 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
17032 Sunset Ford 85.60 Truck Supplies
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17033 Sunset Industrial Parts 122.94 Mechanical Supplies
17034 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration
17035 Target Specialty Products 99.00 Registration
17036 Tekmar Company 185.13 Lab Supplies
17037 Tektronix, Inc. 699.87 Instrument Supplies
17038 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service
17039 Thermo Quest 2,300.00 Lab Maim.Service
17040 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 563.88 Mechanical Supplies
17041 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 340.70 Truck Supplies
17042 TEKsyslems 7,216.00 Temporary Employment Services
17043 U.S.Filter Corporation 2,525.50 Lab Water Purification System Maim.
17044 Ultra Scientific 84.87 Lab Supplies
17045 Union Dodge 18,075.06 1999 Dodge 1500 Pick-up
17046 University of Nevada, Las Vegas 760.00 Seminar Registration
17047 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,640.60 Plumbing Supplies
17048 Vortex Corp. 516.00 Door Repair
17049 VWR Scientific Products 4.294.67 Lab Supplies
17050 The Wackenhut Corporation 11.795.86 Security Guards
17051 Water Environment Federation 967.84 Publications&Ads
rt 17052 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 216.44 Safety Supplies
17053 Western Highway Products,Inc. 305.33 Pavement Marker Supplies
17064 WEF Membership 120.00 Membership
17055 Xerox Corporation 3.611.29 Copier Leases
17056 3 Com Palm Computing,Inc. 118.42 Publications
17057 991&HW-CWEA,Inc. 225.00 Registration
17058 Nicholas J.Arhontes 150.00 Employee Travel Advance
17059 Dell Home Systems,Co.&S. Howard 1,463,15 Employee Computer Loan Program
17080 Michael L. Peterman 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program
17061 Victoria L.Raymond 1,987.01 Employee Computer Loan Program
17062 John D.Stephens 1,463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program
17063 Robert J.Thiede 2,421.90 Employee Computer Loan Program
17064 Edward R. Eisenhauser 1,600.00 Professional Service-Financial
17065 J.D.Edwards Word Solutions Company 500.00 Training Expenses
17066 Aladdin House 74.48 Window Blinds
17067 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 230.87 Mechanical Supplies
17088 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services
17069 Court Order 518.90 Wage Garnishment
17070 BOC Edwards 791.98 Lab Supplies
17071 Calif Centrifugal Pump 674.52 Pump Supplies
17072 Canus Corporation 2,991.72 Fiber Optic Cable
Page 7 of 9 ,
Claims; Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17073 Court Order 681.00 Wage Garnishment
17074 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,123.38 Electrical Supplies
17075 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
17076 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
17077 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads
17078 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
17079 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
17080 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
17081 Geomatrix Consultants 8,336.02 Legal Services
17082 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 44e.95 Truck Supplies
17083 Intergraph Corporation 6,671.88 Annual Software Maint.
17084 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
17085 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
17086 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 693.11 Safety Supplies
17087 J.Spencer Freebairn 201.12 SA Watershed Brisling
17088 Kelar Corp 15,000.00 Professional Services-Project Mgmt. Fundamentals Guide
17089 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.74 Welding Supplies
17090 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 682.60 Tools
17091 Melvin Schwartz,MD 1,750.00 Legal Services
K 17092 Network Construction Services 7,653.61 Construction Services-Wring for J-42
t`o 17093 Neysa M.Call 1.049.77 SA Watershed Briefing
m 17094 Office Pavillicn 346.64 Office Furniture
17095 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment
17096 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
17097 Orange County Wholesale Electric 4,535.18 Electrical Supplies
17098 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 445.45 Fittings
17099 OCEA 615.61 Dues Deduction
17100 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
17101 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
17102 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
17103 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 7,960.00 Engineering Services-Tunnels Evaluation
17104 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies
17105 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 166.11 Tools
17106 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,392.04 Tools/Hardware
17107 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
17108 Skater,Inc. 51.52 Pump Supplies
17109 Snap-On Incorporated 70.33 Tools
17110 So. Cal.Gas Company 28.06 Natural Gas
17111 Southern California Edison 20,103.58 Power
17112 Sprint 58.85 Long Distance Telephone Service
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrard No. Vendor Amount Description
17113 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment
17114 Surveyors Service Company 105.57 Tools
17115 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. 9,860.00 Professional Services NO 4-23-97
17116 Thompson Industrial Supply, In 925.08 Mechanical Supplies
17117 Tomell 8 Cotten 538.80 Legal Services
17118 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 21,760.00 Permit Fees
17119 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
17120 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions
17121 VWR Scientific Products 356.80 Lab Supplies
17122 CASA-Biosolids EIR 25,000.00 Statewide Biosolids Land Application EIR Funding
17123 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28,731.11 Medical Insurance Premium
17124 Orange County Sanitation District 472,264.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
17125 Mar Vac Electronics 124.90 Instrument Supplies
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,783,184.34
Payroll Disbursements
12546-12737 Employee Paychecks $ 112,519.88 Leave Accrual,Termination 8 BOP Payoffs
12738-12878 Employee Paychecks 187,702.69 Biweekly Payroll 1/27/99
Cy 12879-12890 Employee Paychecks 1.182.60 Shift Differential Adjustments
n 34645-35086 Direct Deposit Statements 644,151.04 Biweekly Payroll 127/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 945,556.11
Wire Transfer Payments
None
Total Claims Paid 1116199-1131199 $ 3,728,740.45
Page 9 of 9
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeng Date TOBd.or .DU.
g3R9�99
AGENDA REPORT tam Number tam pumber
Orange County Sanitation District (O
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of the following actions regarding Certification of the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System:
a. Verbal staff report
b. Receive and file Final Program Environmental Impact Report for
the Groundwater Replenishment System.
C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-01, Making Certain Findings
Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft
Program Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater
Replenishment System; adopting a Statement of Overriding
Consideration; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination.
C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 99-02, Certifying the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment
System has been completed in compliance with CEQA.
SUMMARY
This item is the certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR)for the Groundwater Replenishment System, certification of the EIR is one
of several important steps to be completed before a final decision to build the
project can be considered.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8), Page 11, Line Water
Management Projects, A
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Page 1
R
I
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Orange County Water District (OCWD), in cooperation with OCSD, has
completed the environmental compliance materials for the Program EIR/EIS on
the Groundwater Replenishment System. The Draft Program EIR/EIS was
circulated for public comment for 62 days (45 days required by CEQA), and the
comment period closed January 6, 1999. Within the public review period, an
open house attended by about 20 people was held on December 1, 1998. In
addition, a public hearing was conducted by the Joint Cooperative Committee on
December 8, 1998, at which 12 people spoke.
Twenty-two written comments were received throughout the comment period.
Responses to the eleven oral comments received at the December Sin public
hearing and the 22 written comments have been prepared and included in the
Final EIR. The Final EIR was circulated on February 22, 1999, to all that
received the Draft EIR, or had made written and/or oral comments. OCSD Board
of Directors received the Final EIR (Attachment "A" to Resolution 99-01) by
separate letter in February. CEQA requires a ten-day circulation of the Final EIR.
As of this writing, we have not received any comments on the Final EIR; if any
comments are received, they will be report at the March 24 meeting.
Separately, the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) closed the public comment period
on the federal Draft EIS for the project. No one attended the public hearing on
January 28, 1999, held at OCWD.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Item "b and c" in the General Manager's Recommendation in this report includes
the CEQA Actions for this project.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. OCSD 99-01 (with Attachment"B") and
Resolution No. OCSD 99412.
JRH:jp:jak
H:Nip.dta%agenda\Board Agenda RepoW1999 Board Agenda Re,,Ws0399\G R EIR Eoc
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-01
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GROUNDWATER
REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ("THE PROJECT"1; ADOPTING A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPTING
A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION; AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
RE SAID PROJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
("THE PROJECT"); ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT
MARCH 24, 1999
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD), hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval of a
water reclamation project, described as the Groundwater Replenishment System,
hereinafter referred to as "GWR System"; and,
WHEREAS, District and the Orange County Water District of Orange County
(OCWD), California (hereinafter referred to as Water District) are the lead agencies for
the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the GWR System,
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"),
the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the GWR System's environmental impacts objectively,
Water District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and ,y
alternatives associated with the GWR System; and,
WHEREAS, Water District has consulted with other public agencies and the
general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program EIR as
required by CEOA; and,
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, the Joint Cooperative Committee for the
Groundwater Replenishment System, previously formed by the District and the Water
District, held a duly-noticed public hearing to provide a further opportunity for the
general public to comment on and respond to the Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, Water District has objectively evaluated the comments from public
agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft Program
EIR, either in full or in summary, together with Water District's responses to significant
environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process, have been
included in the Final Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR and the
Final Program EIR have been presented to the members of the Board of Directors of
District for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to,
the Groundwater Replenishment System.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
-2-
SECTION 1. That the proposed Groundwater Replenishment System has
identified a number of significant or potentially significant environmental effects. These
impacts are identifed in the Final Program EIR, that is appended to this Resolution as
ATTACHMENT "A".
SECTION 2. That the Board of Directors do further find that changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed Project, which
avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects, all identified in the Final
Program EIR.
SECTION 3. Significant impacts identified in the Final Program EIR that will be
mitigated to less-than-significant levels by that District are as follows:
A. LAND USE AND PLANNING
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Land
Use and Planning are described on pages 3-6 to 3-19 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Project Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment
System would result in the following impacts:
1. Construction of the new advanced water treatment plant will result in the
demolition of some existing facilities within the OCWD/OCSD complex
including part of the existing Water Factory 21 which will create
construction impacts including the generation of dust, construction traffic,
noise and potential conflicts with existing underground utilities.
2. The tall ammonia stripping towers on the western edge of OCWD's
property will be removed.
3. New water treatment facilities will be constructed on a portion of the
Garfield Recreation Vehicle (RV)/Self Storage Yard which is located on
land owned by the OCSD. This will result in the need to impact the
operation of this facility and ultimately the permanent removal of RVs and
other material stored on this site.
4. Construction of the 78-inch major conveyance pipeline from the new
advanced water treatment plant to Kraemer Percolation Basin in Anaheim
-3-
will temporarily disrupt a variety of land uses between the treatment
facilities and the Santa Ana River, depending upon which route is used.
The exact route the pipeline will follow will be determined by OCWD and
OCSD during final project design.
Under Option A, the pipeline would be constructed within the
OCWD/OCSD complex and along a portion of Garfield Avenue.
Pipeline construction would temporarily impact a portion of the RV/Self
Storage yard and the entrance to this facility. Access to the Southern
California Edison substation and the Village Nurseries on the south
side of Garfield Avenue will also be temporarily impeded. The flow of
traffic on the portion of Garfield Avenue impacted by pipeline
construction would also be temporarily impeded.
Under Option B, the pipeline would be developed within the
OCWD/OCSD complex and, from the complex to the Santa Ana River,
within exiting road rights-of-way. Construction of the pipeline would
temporarily impact commercial and industrial land uses along portions
of Mount Langley Street, Spencer Avenue, Mount Baldy Circle and
Condor Avenue. Dust and noise impacts would be created on these
land uses and some on-street parking would be temporarily removed
on some of these streets. The flow of traffic will also be impacted on
the streets where the pipeline is constructed. The San Diego Freeway
(1-405) will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under the
Freeway.
Under Option C, the pipeline would be developed within the
OCWD/OCSD complex and, from the complex to the Santa Ana River,
within existing road rights-of-way, along a portion of a flood control
channel and under the San Diego Freeway. Noise and dust from
construction of the pipeline would temporarily impact employees
working in the administrative offices of the OCWD and the residential,
commercial and industrial land uses along portions of Ellis Avenue,
Ward Street, Talbert Avenue and Mac Arthur Boulevard. The use of a
portion of the East Valley Flood Control Channel would temporarily be
restricted during construction of the pipeline within the bottom or sides
of this Channel. The City of Fountain Valley Maintenance Yard and
Police Training Facility adjacent to the Channel would also be
temporarily impacted by noise and dust from construction of the
pipeline in the Channel. Some on-street parking would be temporarily
removed on Ellis Avenue, Ward Street and Talbert Avenue and the
flow of traffic on these streets would be disrupted. The San Diego
Freeway will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under the
Freeway.
-4-
5. For all pipeline options, once the pipeline reaches the Santa Ana River it
would be constructed under the Santa Ana River in the cities of Fountain
Valley and Costa Mesa and then within or adjacent to the River levy
through the cities of Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim and
unincorporated County territory. The pipeline would also be developed
within the levy of the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel in the City of
Anaheim. Construction of the pipeline in these areas will temporarily
disrupt the use of portions of the Santa Ana River Trail as it runs through
these cities and County territory, temporarily forcing a detour of the River
Trail, In Costa Mesa, pipeline construction will temporarily disrupt the
existing underground pipelines and other utilities known to exist within the
portion of the River levee within the City. Pipeline dust, noise and
construction traffic will temporarily impact a number of single-family
residences, aboveground high voltage power lines, Moon Park and an
industrial park in Costa Mesa. In Santa Ana, pipeline construction will
temporarily impact Centennial Regional Park, a number of single and
multi-family residences, Spurgeon Park, the sports fields at Spurgeon
Intermediate School and the mouth of Santiago Creek. Play on the River
View Golf Course in Santa Ana would be temporarily disrupted if the
pipeline is routed through the golf course. In Orange, pipeline
construction would temporarily impact the overpass of the Union Pacific
Railroad as it crosses the Santa Ana River and a number of businesses
and industrial land uses next to the River. In Anaheim, pipeline
construction will temporarily impact a number of single family, multiple
family and industrial land uses. The Kramer Percolation Basin would also
be impacted where the pipeline feeds into the Basin. The Santa Ana
Freeway (1-5), the Orange Freeway (SR57) and the Riverside Freeway
(SR-91) will also be impacted by jacking the pipeline under these
Freeways.
6. Improvements to and the extension of the Talbert Seawater Intrusion
Barrier will result in the need to repair existing water injection wells in Ellis
Avenue in Fountain Valley and construction of new water supply pipelines
carrying treated water to new injection wells to be developed within
streets in Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County
territory. The precise location of the new wells will be determined during
the final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Construction
of new injection wells within public street rights-of-way will result in the
temporary disruption of traffic traveling on adjacent streets and temporary
dust, noise and construction impacts on the single-family residences,
commercial, educational facilities, electric substations and parks that front
onto or back up to the affected street rights-of-way. In unincorporated
County territory, a new water supply pipeline would be installed under and
within levees of the Santa Ana River, temporarily impacting users of the
Santa Ana River Trail.
-5-
B. SOCIOECONOMIC/GROWTH INDUCEMENT '
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
SocioeconomiclGrowth Inducement are described on pages 3-27 to 3-30 of the
Program EIRlfier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the
Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts.
Impact on Employment
1. An additional 18 employees will be needed to operate Groundwater
Replenishment System facilities at full build out.
2. Construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will
result in a temporary increase in construction jobs necessary to build
system facilities.
3. Some treated water can be made available for use as industrial process
water, irrigation water or for other approved uses via connections to the
major conveyance pipeline in industrial areas, business parks, golf
courses, and parks located adjacent or proximate to the Santa Ana River
alignment. This may be perceived as growth inducing by some people.
Impact on Population and Housing
1. The Groundwater Replenishment System does not in any way affect the
availability or cost of housing in the project area since it does not require
removal of any homes, nor does it result in a substantial creation of new
jobs which could secondarily affect the population and housing
characteristics of the program area or region.
Impact on Low to Moderate Income Housing Needs
1. Implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System is not
anticipated to affect the cost of housing in the program area, as it does
not remove existing housing nor fully meet the water demands for planned
growth in the program area or region.
C. GEOLOGY
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Geology are described on pages 3-38 to 340 of the Program EIR7Tier 1 EIS. Approval
of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the implementation of the Proposed
Action would result in the following impacts.
-6-
1. Pipeline rupture during a seismic event could result in underground and
surface spillage of treated water supplies, with the potential for localized
flooding, erosion, liquefaction, differential settlement and lateral
spreading.
2. The southerly portion of where treatment facilities will be developed and
most of the area of the Seawater Intrusion Barrier and injection wells will
be located in urbanized areas underlain by prime agricultural soils.
Development of the aforementioned facilities will remove these soils from
future agricultural use.
3. The OCWD/OCSD complex is located in an area subject to ground
shaking during future seismic events and is thus subject to potential
liquefaction. New advanced water treatment facilities developed within
this complex are subject to damage from liquefaction during future seismic
events.
4. Because the OCWD/OCSD complex is subject to ground shaking from
future seismic events, differential settlement and lateral spreading are
also possible within this complex.
5. The major conveyance pipeline will be subject to groundshaking during
future seismic events and thus would be subject to damage from soil
liquefaction.
6. Because the major conveyance pipeline is subject to future
groundshaking, differential settlement and lateral spreading of the soil
may occur, particularly where the pipeline is placed within the levees of
the Santa Ana River. Pipe placed within local streets will experience less
lateral spreading with increased distance from the Santa Ana River. Pipe
placed in the River bottom will not be subject to lateral spreading.
7. Water injection and new treated water pipelines developed as part of the
expansion of the seawater intrusion barrier will be subject to future
groundshaking during future seismic events and would be subject to
potential damage from soil liquefaction.
B. Wells and pipelines to be installed as part of the expansion of the
seawater intrusion barrier will be subject to future groundshaking and
differential settlement and lateral spreading of the soil may occur,
particularly where new pipelines are placed within the levees of the Santa
Ana River. Pipelines installed within local streets to serve new injection
wells will experience less lateral spreading with increased distance from
the Santa Ana River.
-7-
D. WATER RESOURCES
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Water
Resources are described on pages 3-463-61 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval
of the Proposed Action and construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System
would result in the following impacts:
Facts on Surface Water/Flooding
1. Implementation of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities have a
direct temporary impact on the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel,
the Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, numerous flood control channels
and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel depending on where the
construction of the major conveyance pipeline occurs.
2. Groundwater recharge areas will be affected by the use of Kraemer
Retarding Basin for recharge.
3. An emergency outlet valve placed in the major conveyance pipeline at
some point along that portion of the pipe which lies south of 17' Street in
Santa Ana will discharge treated water into the Santa Ana River in an
unusual emergency situation or when there is not residual capacity for
recharge of treated water at the Kraemer Basin
4. Conveyance facilities installed within the bottom of the Santa Ana River
and across flood control channels would be subject to damage from high
River flows should they be constructed during periods of heavy rainfall
events or during times when large amounts of water are released from
Prado Dam.
5. The construction of the major conveyance pipeline in the Santa Ana
River, Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel and Fountain Valley Flood
Control Channel would involve excavation and trenching in portions of the
channel bottoms and/or sides which would result in temporary siltation of
water in the channels and the ocean should heavy rain events occur
during construction or, in the case of the Santa Ana River, there is a
release of a large amount of water from Prado Dam.
6. Water traversing the area where the conveyance pipeline is being
installed could wash away soil during rainstorms if protective measures
are not implemented to protect the exposed soil.
7. Development of additional injection wells and pipelines would impact the
Santa Ana River and the Greenville Banning Flood Control Channel since
-8-
a new reclaimed water pipeline would need to be constructed across
these facilities.
Impacts on Groundwater
8. The Groundwater Replenishment System will affect the Orange County
groundwater basin and the use of that basin as a water supply in that up
to 120,000 AFY of recycled water will ultimately be introduced into the
local groundwater basin. The quality of the recycled water could have a
significant impact on the quality of the groundwater.
9. Department of Health Service regulatory provisions could require that
some domestic water production wells be removed from service.
10. Recycled water flows spread in the Kraemer Basin would need to meet
the objectives for the unconfined portion of the basin, while flows injected
along the coast would need to meet the objectives for the confined portion
of the basin.
11. Since it appears that no vadose zone exists at Kraemer Basin, the
Groundwater Replenishment System must comply with the 2,000 feet
distance and 12-month criteria for spreading. Based on preliminary
hydrogeologic assessment, it appears that two existing production wells in
the Anaheim area would be affected by the project and have to be
abandoned.
12. Should modeling and field studies demonstrate that additional production
wells are within the minimum distance and travel times criteria, then
additional wells will have to be abandoned.
13. If the Talbert Gap Barrier is extended northward to include the Bolsa Gap,
some production wells in the Fountain Valley area may fall within the
2,000 foot, 12-month zone of influence and would have to be abandoned.
Impacts on Marine Environment
14. Backwash and brines derived from desalination of secondary-treated
effluent from the Groundwater Reclamation System would be mixed with
the existing wastewater effluent from OCSD's Plant No. 1 for ocean
disposal.
15. Using projected brine loads and concentrations, it is estimated that
wastewater effluent total dissolved salts (TDS) in brine coming from the
OCSD treatment plant would increase 711 to 851 mg/L by the year 2010,
with the receiving water TDS being about 35,000 mg/L.
-9-
E. AIR QUALITY
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System Project on
Air Quality are described on pages 3-68 to 3-77 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts:
Construction Impacts
1. Temporary air quality impacts will result from the construction of
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. It is estimated that project
grading activities, emissions from construction equipment and workers
vehicles will generate a 'worse case" total of 122 pounds of Carbon
Monoxide, 15 pounds of Reactive Organic Compounds, 125 pounds of
Nitrogen Oxides, 79 pounds of particulates (PM10) and 12 pounds of
Sulfur Oxides each day.
Lono Term Regional Impacts
2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will generate long term regional
air quality impacts. The main source of regional emissions will be from
the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site.
Other emissions will be generated from the combustion of natural gas for
space heating and operations staff automobile traffic. At this time, the
quantity of emissions from this combustion is indeterminable. Further
studies will be necessary to determine the impacts of these emissions.
However, for a program of this size, emissions of this sort do not
constitute significant emissions.
3. Emissions will result from off-site generation of electricity to power
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. At this time, the design of
the Groundwater Replenishment System is not complete. Therefore, the
electrical requirements for the program can only be roughly estimated.
However, it is not expected that these facilities will draw enough power to
constitute a significant adverse air quality impact at the point of
generation. Further studies will be necessary to more precisely calculate
power generation emissions.
Impacts from Cumulative Regional Emissions
4. Taken individually, emissions generated by the various aspects of the
Groundwater Replenishment System will probably not exceed the
SCAQMD thresholds of significance. However, the cumulative increase in
the regional emission levels due to the Groundwater Replenishment
-10-
System may exceed the SCAOMD's thresholds of significance for some or
all pollutants.
Compliance with Air Quality Planning —Consistency with AQMP
5. The Groundwater Replenishment System is not projected to significantly
impact the local air quality, therefore the project is found to be consistent
with the Air Quality Management Plan's (AQMP) first criterion (Increase in
the Frequency or Severity of Violations). The population forecasts of
those to be served by the Groundwater Replenishment System are the
same demographics as the AQMD, and therefore the project is consistent
with the second criterion of the AQMP (Exceed Assumptions on the
AQMP). Thus it was determined that the Groundwater Replenishment
System is consistent with the AQMP.
F. TRANSPORTATION
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System Project on
Transportation are described on pages 3-85 to 3-91 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of Groundwater Replenishment
facilities would result in the following impacts:
Construction Impacts
1. Construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will result in
temporary impacts to public services such as mail delivery, sanitation
pick-up, transit operations and emergency services due to project
construction vehicles traveling on area roadways.
2. Temporary loss of access to adjacent property and loss of on-street
parking would occur with construction of some Groundwater
Replenishment System facilities.
3. The construction of the conveyance pipeline trench will require the import
of sand and export of spoil material which will temporarily increase the
level of truck traffic on streets used as haul routes.
4. Construction of the advanced water treatment plant will not significantly
impact area roadways since most project construction will be done
outside of roadway rights-of-way and is not expected to generate a
significant amount of traffic.
5. Should the major conveyance pipeline be constructed around the River
View Golf Course, project construction activities would impact 17" Street,
English Road and Alone Street in the City of Santa Ana. Considering the
_11-
existing street width on English Road and Alone Street, it is likely that
these streets, which are fronted by residential land use, may be required
to be temporarily closed. Converting these streets to one-way traffic flow
may be possible.
6. Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be
followed, traffic on Garfield Avenue between Ward Street and the Santa
Ana River may temporarily be delayed by project construction vehicles.
7. Should the Option B alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be
followed, then on-street parking along portions of Mt. Langley Street,
Spencer Avenue, Mt. Baldy street and Condor Avenue would need to be
temporarily removed. Driveways to the commercial and industrial
businesses along these streets would also be temporarily obstructed,
interfering with access to these businesses.
8. Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be
followed, then temporary impacts to traffic operation on Ward Street and
Talbert Avenue would occur. The traffic volumes on Talbert Avenue
would likely result in LOS F conditions during the peak hours if the
number of lanes on this street were temporarily reduced from four to two.
9. Construction of the pipeline segments connecting the injection/extraction
wells to the treatment plant would result in temporary impacts to traffic
operations on Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Bushard Street, Yorktown
Avenue, Ward Street, Adams Avenue, East Mesa Verde Avenue and
Gisler Avenue, or other routes used for pipeline alignments.
Long-Term Operational Impacts
10. Operation of the expanded treatment facility will result in additional
employee, delivery and maintenance vehicle traffic traveling to and from
the OCWD/OCSD complex which will increase traffic volumes on streets
used by these vehicles.
11. The expanded treatment facility will result in the need for additional
chemical deliveries to the facility. The increase in chemicals being
delivered to this facility will include:
• 7.7 truckloads per week of sulfuric acid;
3.6 truckloads per week of threshold inhibitors;
• 3.0 truckloads per week of lime;
• 41.4 truckloads per week of sodium hypochlorite;
• 1 truckload of cleaning chemicals;
1.2 truckloads of sodium hydroxide, and
-12-
• 1.2 truckloads of citric acid.
G. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Biological Resources are described on pages 3-103 to 3-105 of the Program EIR/Tier 1
EIS. Approval of the project and construction of Groundwater Replenishment System
facilities would result in the following impacts:
1. Construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will
temporarily disturb the habitat on and adjacent to the areas where System
facilities are constructed.
2. Use of the Kraemer Basin for recycled water recharge will result in the
long-term alterations of the Basin due to fluctuations in the water level of
the Basin.
3. Birds could potentially be affected by construction and operation of
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities.
4. It is possible that water supply lines could be routed along the edge of a
park or golf course and disturb some ornamental and/or non-native
landscaping.
H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on
Energy and Mineral Resources are described on pages 3-107 to 109 of the Program
EIR and Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts:
Energy Impacts
1. The Groundwater Replenishment System will require moderate quantities
of fossil fuels and electric power for System construction activities.
2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will require substantial amounts
of energy in the long-term to operate the pump conveying source water,
the various treatment processes and pumps at the advanced water
treatment plant, the pumps needed to deliver water to the Kraemer Basin
for recharge and to inject water into the Seawater Intrusion Barrier, and
for ancillary uses such as lighting, communications, heating and air
conditioning.
-13-
3. Reverse osmosis (RO) treatment is a particularly energy intensive
process, although many advances have been made over the years to
reduce the energy requirements for operation of RO units.
4. The Groundwater Replenishment System will have the following
estimated total energy demand:
Phase 1 88.9 million kilowatt hours a year (kWh/yr)
Phase 2 133.2 million kWh/yr
Phase 3 177.7 million kWh/yr
Mineral Resource Impacts
5. The major conveyance pipeline for the Groundwater Replenishment
System will be constructed in areas that are designated as mineral
resource zoned for aggregate resources, including sand and gravel
resources which are used for area construction purposes.
6. There is an operating sand and gravel mine just north of Lincoln Avenue
and east of the Santa Ana River. However, the Groundwater
Replenishment System will not adversely affect existing mining activity in
this area.
I. HAZARDS/RISK OF UPSET
The potential significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment Project on
Hazards/Risk of Upset are described on pages 3-113 to 121 of the Program EIR/Tier 1
EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System facilities would result in the following impacts.
1. There may be a perceived concern that the direct injection of reclaimed
water into the groundwater table may impact public health.
2. An emergency outlet valve will be incorporated into the major conveyance
pipeline south of 17' Street. In an unusual or extreme emergency
situation treated product water would be released into the Santa Ana
River.
3. Water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to be directly
injected into the Talbert Barrier will receive more MF filtration and receive
more demineralization with RO than System water sent to the Kraemer
Basin for percolation into the groundwater table. A portion of the flow will
be treated by granular activated carbon. In addition, a separate UV light
disinfection process will be provided to achieve the required 5-109
reduction in virus. Therefore, the advanced treatment process for the
-14-
Talbert Barrier will be complete treatment with MF followed by partial
demineralization with RO. The remaining flow will receive granulated
activated carbon treatment for organics removal for the entire flowstream.
The RO permeate will be disinfected through contact time n the existing
Water Factory-21 chlorinazation chamber with 5.0 mg/L free chlorine
residual, while the MF filtrate will be disinfected with two banks of UV
lamps providing up to 5-log reduction in any virus in this water. The two
streams will be blended together to consume all remaining free chlorine,
avoiding the formation of disinfection by-products.
4. The project will use sodium hypochlorite solution as the primary water
disinfectant. Up to 32,400 gallons per day will be used in the advanced
water treatment system.
5. Other chemicals that would be used as part of the advanced water
treatment include up to:
• 6,000 gallons per day of sulfuric acid;
7,200 pounds per day of lime;
• 2,400 gallons per day of threshold inhibitor and;
• Small amounts of cleaning chemicals.
• 1.2 truckloads of sodium hydroxide per week.
• 1.2 truckloads of citric acid per week.
6. Sodium hypochlorite is a hazardous substance. Potential risks
associated with this material are accidental release from leaks, spills, and
rupture or traffic accidents. An accidental spill of a substantial quantity of
sodium hypochlorite on the treatment plant site could result in direct
exposure of site workers and possibly occupants of adjacent properties to
vapors, which would most likely result in respiratory irritation, particularly
in sensitive individuals. Prolonged contact with this material could result
in skin irritation, although non long-term, adverse health effects are
known to be associated with exposure.
7. The accidental release of sulfuric acid poses the greatest public health
hazard. This material is highly corrosive to all body tissues and direct
contact or inhalation of fumes can cause severe bums. Ingestion of
sulfuric acid can be fatal. An uncontrolled release of sulfuric acid from
storage tanks on the OCWD/OCSD site or as a result of a traffic accident
involving truck delivery would likely result in significant adverse effects to
occupants of the site and surrounding area.
8. The remaining chemicals use on the site consist of mild acids and dry
alkaline compounds which are not anticipated to present a potential public
health threat.
-15-
9. Subsurface soil and groundwater contamination from hazardous wastes
may be encountered during proposed construction activities involving
excavation. Hazardous waste contamination can result in potential clean-
up liability issues but may also pose a serious human health threat to
persons exposed to the contaminants during conveyance pipeline
excavation activities.
10. Implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System may result in
temporary impacts related to emergency vehicle access. These
construction related impacts would occur for approximately one month
during the construction period for any location adjacent to the conveyance
pipeline. This would be particularly difficult if the conveyance pipeline
was placed in the narrow streets adjacent to the River View Golf Course.
Preservation of emergency access would be extremely problematic.
Should Option B be selected for the installation of the conveyance
pipeline between the OCWD/OCSD complex, then emergency access to
the commercial and industrial land uses along portions of Mt. Langley
Street, Spencer Street Mt. Baldy Street and Condor Avenue may not be
maintained throughout construction, and delays in response time may
occur.
11. Traffic flow on roadways adjacent to pipeline and injection well
construction areas would be slower, although it is not anticipated that this
will result in an increase in accidents, particularly serious ones.
12. Children playing in or near construction areas during non-construction
hours may be injured.
13. In the unlikely event of pipeline rupture due to a major seismic event or
other cause, temporary flooding in areas not specifically designed to
convey large amounts of flowing water could cause extensive damage.
Such an event could disrupt public services, utilities, use of surface roads
and emergency services for an undetermined amount of time. If the
conveyance pipeline were to be installed in the streets adjacent to the
River View Golf Course, pipeline rupture could result in flooding that may
significantly damage the homes which are immediately adjacent to the
narrow 36-foot street rights-of-way.
Under option A, conveyance pipeline failure outside of the Santa Ana
River alignment could possibly result in flooding the Southern California
Edison substation and Village Nursery along Garfield Avenue.
Substantial flooding could disrupt electrical service in some locations if
-16-
the substation is adversely affected. Temporary traffic impacts could also
occur along portions of Garfield and Ward Street.
Under Option B, conveyance pipeline failure could possibly result in
flooding within the commercial and industrial uses along Mt. Langely
Street, Spencer Street, Mt. Baldy Street and Condor Avenue. Businesses
adjacent to the point of rupture may experience property damage and
temporary loss of access. Temporary traffic impacts would also occur if
flooding occurred along Ellis Avenue and Ward Street.
Under Option C conveyance pipeline failure could possibly result in
flooding of adjacent residential land uses west of Ward Street and
business park uses east of Ward Street. Business park uses south of
Talbert Avenue could also be affected. Land uses adjacent to the point of
rupture would receive the most substantial property damage.
14. There is the potential that the weedy vegetation within the Santa Ana
River where the conveyance pipeline is to be installed could catch on fire
during pipeline construction activities.
15. There is the potential for construction equipment and supplies to be
stolen during project construction activities.
J. NOISE
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Noise
are described on pages 3-129 to 3-133 of the Program EIRITier 1 EIS. Approval of the
Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System
would result in the following impacts:
Construction Noise Imoacts
1. Rock drills may be required for the construction of some of the System
injection wells and jackhammers may be necessary for pipeline
construction. This equipment will create temporary construction noise
levels from 70 to 105 dBA at a distance of 50 feet from these construction
areas.
2. Sites near the treatment plant will experience temporary construction
noise levels ranging up to the high BO dBA range.
3. Sites near the major conveyance pipeline and seawater intrusion barrier
pipeline routes may experience temporary construction noise levels
ranging up to the high 90 dBA range.
_17-
4. Should the conveyance pipeline be constructed on streets adjacent to the
River View Golf Course then the homes adjacent to these streets will be
temporarily subject to high noise levels.
& Sites, including residential land uses, near the injection wells could
experience temporary construction noise levels in the 100 dBA range.
Haul Truck Noise Impacts
6. It will be necessary to use haul trucks in order to construct the
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities. Temporary haul truck
noise on residential streets would constitute a significant noise impact
because ambient (background) noise is fairly low. Construction traffic
would raise noise levels in residential neighborhoods and constitute a
significant impact.
7. Haul route traffic atop the levee along the Santa Ana River would
temporarily impact residential neighborhoods along the portion of the
River levee where the conveyance pipeline is constructed.
8. Temporary haul route traffic along arterial roadways would most likely not
constitute a significant impact because such roadways already carry high
traffic volumes to an extent that additional project trucks would not raise
noise levels by more than 3 dBA and would not generally be noticeable to
motorists and adjacent receptors.
Operational Noise Impacts From the Treatment Plant
9. Long-term operational noise will be generated by the System treatment
plant, pumps and injection wells. At this time, the design of the treatment
plant is only conceptual so the level of noise that would be generated is
not known at this time.
K. PUBLIC SERVICES
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on Public
Services are described on pages 3-137 to 3-141 in the Program EIR/fier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System would result in the following impacts:
1. Construction of facilities called for by the Groundwater Replenishment
System will result in the creation of open trenches and equipment left
unsecured which will result in a temporary increased need for security
services in construction areas to prevent potential theft, vandalism or
injury to persons who may enter construction sites. This will result in a
-18-
temporary increase in the need for police, fire protection and emergency
services.
2. The Groundwater Replenishment System will not result in any direct
impact to any school facilities. However, it may temporarily impact the
entrance and exit to a school training facility on Yorktown Avenue in
Huntington Beach.
3. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will
require temporary lane closures on streets that serve as public bus
routes. While existing bus routes will be maintained during construction
activities, bus riders may have to walk slightly farther around construction
zones to access sidewalks. Bus stops may be temporarily shut down and
people routed to the nearest stop, or routes may be moved to the nearest
parallel street.
4. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities may
temporarily impact paratransil or door-to-door bus service which is used
by the elderly and disabled. However, paralransit service will be
maintained during construction activities, although those using this
service may have to change the location where these vehicles pick them
up.
5. The construction of Groundwater Replenishment System facilities will
create additional amounts of construction debris, including spoil material
unearthed during excavation of pipeline trenches, that must be disposed
of in area landfills. It is estimated that up to two cubic yard of spoil
material may be generated per each linear foot of pipeline trench. Should
contaminated soils be uncovered during trenching activities then this
material would need to be disposed of at a Class I landfill.
6. Refuse collection services pickup points may need to be temporarily
relocated due to the construction of pipeline trenches in some street
rights-of-way in the project construction area. However, project
construction activities will not interfere with pickup of refuse generated by
the land uses located adjacent to project construction areas.
7. Should conveyance pipeline Option B be selected, construction of the
pipeline on Ellis Avenue and Talbert Avenue would temporarily impact
bus routes 37 and 74.
8. Construction of a potential water injection well could indirectly impact the
Isojiro Oka School at 9800 Yorktown Avenue which is operated by the
Fountain Valley School District.
-19-
L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Utilities and Service Systems are described on pages 3-147 to 3-151 of the Program
EIR/Tier 1 EIS. Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the
Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the following impacts:
1. During construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System project,
project water pipelines will cross other existing water pipelines. The
conveyance pipeline could potentially impact the OCWD force main at
Ball Road/Taft Avenue which delivers replenishment water from the Burris
Pit Pump Station to the Bond Street recharge basin. This water pipeline
will be protected in place. All other water pipelines impacted by project
pipeline construction will be protected in place or relocated.
2. Project water pipelines will cross existing natural gas pipelines. Existing
gas pipelines will either be protected in place or will be relocated.
3. Project water pipelines will cross existing local electric distribution lines.
These electrical lines will either be protected in place or will be relocated.
The System conveyance pipeline will be constructed under and/or
adjacent to the massive electric transmission line easement located to the
east of the Santa Ana River between the San Diego Freeway and Garfield
Avenue.
4. Project water pipelines will cross existing sewer lines including the Santa
Ana River Interceptor and other OCSD trunk sewer lines. These sewer
lines will be protected in place. All other sewer lines will either be
protected in place or will be relocated.
5. Project water pipelines will cross existing storm drains. Conveyance
pipeline Option C would directly impact a portion of the Fountain Valley
Flood Control Channel Right-of-way between Ward Street and Talbert
Avenue. Should this Option be selected then this flood control channel
will be trenched and open cut, the conveyance pipeline installed and the
flood control channel would be reconstructed above the pipeline. The
major conveyance pipeline will be constructed from the Santa Ana River
to the Kraemer Basin in the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel. Other
flood control channels or storm drains will either be protected in place or
will be relocated during dry weather.
6. Project water pipelines will cross existing communication trunk lines.
During construction, communication lines will either be protected n place
or will be relocated.
-20-
7. Project water pipelines will cross cable television lines. During
construction, cable television lines will either be protected in place or
relocated.
8. The Groundwater Replenishment System will assist the OCSD by using a
large supply of secondary treated wastewater. This reduces the amount
of wastewater that is discharged to the ocean outfall. This reduction is
important during peak storm periods when the capacity of the outfall could
be exceeded.
9. The Groundwater Replenishment System will enhance the dependable
dry season water supply by using the steadily available supply of treated
wastewater from the OCSD Plant.
M. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Aesthetics are described on pages 3-3-156 to 3-161 of the Program EIRliier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System would result in the following impacts:
1. Numerous treatment facility components will be constructed on the
OCWD/OCSD site. These facilities would modify views from the adjacent
streets since the following structures would be developed:
• A Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) building which could be up to
30 feet tall;
• An UV disinfection building which could be up to 30 feet tall and
located near Ellis Avenue;
• An MF/UF building which could be up to 30 feet tall;
• An RO facility which will not exceed 40 feet in height.
• A pump station building approximately 25 feet tall;
• A one story maintenance/Storage building approximately 20 feet
tall; and
• Various small one-story support buildings including a visitors
center and a cleaning/chemicals storage building.
2. Construction impacts related to proposed treatment facilities include
modification of views from adjacent streets during the day as well as at
night if construction scheduling mandates nighttime construction
activities.
3. It is possible that some construction could occur during the early evening
hours of darkness in winter months, creating light and glare impacts from
these activities.
-21-
4. Construction-related visual impacts associated with pump stations would
include those to views from adjacent and surrounding properties during
the day. Additionally, nighttime impacts could occur if construction
scheduling mandates evening or nighttime construction activities.
5. Option Alignment A conveyance pipeline construction impacts would
include temporary effects on views from within the street right-of-way and
adjacent properties both during the day as well as at night if construction
related scheduling mandates evening or nighttime construction activities
which could generate light/glare onto adjacent property.
6. Option Alignment B conveyance pipeline construction impacts would have
the same aesthetic impacts as Option A. However, because a longer
route is involved which abuts an array of businesses, construction would
likely occur mostly at night. During the daytime, both workers and
business patrons would experience temporary visual impacts due to idle
construction equipment, pipeline staging areas and excavated material
piles.
7. Option Alignment C conveyance pipeline construction would generate
temporary construction-related and nighttime impacts similar to those
described for Option A.
8. The conveyance pipeline would be constructed within sections of the
Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel.
Construction in these areas would temporarily impact views from
surrounding properties and freeway crossings as well as to users of the
Santa Ana River Trail. Surrounding properties would be impacted during
the day and night if construction scheduling mandates activities during
hours of darkness.
9. If the conveyance pipeline is developed through the River View Golf
Course then vegetation within the golf course will be temporarily removed,
creating a visual impact to visitors to the golf course.
10. If the conveyance pipeline is developed on the streets surrounding the
River View Golf Course then extensive temporary visual disturbance
would occur to the occupants of the single family homes that line the
streets where the pipeline would be installed.
11. Construction of addition injection wells and pipelines to supply these wells
will result in temporary light/glare impacts onto adjacent properties and
temporary visual impacts due to idle construction equipment, pipeline
staging areas and excavated material piles.
22
N. CULTURAL RESOURCES
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on
Cultural Resources are described on page 3-175 to 3-178. Approval of the Proposed
Action and construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System would result in the
following impacts:
Paleontological Resources Impacts
1. The advanced water treatment plant would be developed within the
OCWD/OCSD complex which is of low to no paleontologic sensitivity.
2. The major conveyance pipeline would be constructed in sediments of low
to no paleontologic sensitivity.
3. If the Seawater Intrusion Barrier be constructed on the Huntington Beach
or Costa Mesa mesas they would be constructed within sediments with a
high paleontologic sensitive. Trenching, grading and well drilling have
the potential to impact both vertebrate, plant and invertebrate fossil
materials in these areas.
Archaeological/Historical Resource Impacts
4. Development of the advanced water treatment plant will not result in any
impacts on archaeological or historic resources since it is believed that
none of these resources exist within the project site.
5. Depending on the alternative selected for the conveyance pipeline and
construction methods used for the installation of the pipeline, all or
several of the archaeological sites and the Pacific Electric Bridge which
crosses the Santa Ana River near 5" Street may be impacted by
construction of this pipeline. CA-ORA-517, CA-ORAA28A29, and -130
are between 1,000 and 2,000 feet from the pipeline route.
6. There is the potential for buried historic and archaeological remains to be
found during construction of the conveyance pipeline. The extent of this
impact will not be known until any of the resources that are found are
evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the California Register or the
National Register of Historic Places.
7. Depending on the location/route selected for new injection wells and
pipelines to serve them, all or several of a number of archaeological sites
may be impacted by the development of these facilities. The archeological
-23-
sites are CA-ORA-76, CA-ORA-163, CA-ORA-516, CA-ORA-145,
CA-ORA-283, CA-ORA-302 and CA-ORA-356.
0. RECREATION
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Recreation are described on pages 3- 189 to 3-191 of the Program EIRlfier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System would result in the following impacts:
1. The construction of the advanced water treatment will not result in any
impacts to existing recreation resources since there are no recreation
resources within or adjacent to the treatment plant site.
2. Construction of the major conveyance pipeline would create a direct but
temporary disturbance to portions of the River View Golf Course and the
Santa Ana River Trail where pipe is being installed.
3. Parks adjacent to the construction area in the Santa Ana River Trail and
east levee of the River will not experience direct physical impacts, but
park users may be subject to temporary construction noise and potential
construction-generated dust.
4. In many of the parks adjacent to the Santa Ana River Trail, patrons will be
able to move away from the temporarily noisy area near the construction
zone which will be the case in Moon Park in Costa Mesa, Spurgeon Park,
Edna Park and Alone Park in Santa Ana and golfers on Willowick Golf
Course, also in the City of Santa Ana.
5. Some park patrons using designated facilities near the construction zone
will be unable to move further away from the temporary construction
noise. This is the case in Centennial Regional Park where an outdoor
sports arena used for Soccer and other sports is located adjacent to the
construction zone and spectator bleachers are immediately located
adjacent to the Santa Ana River Trail.
6. Golfers using the River View Golf Course will be precluded from
traversing any part of the course within or adjacent to the conveyance
pipeline construction zone. Since construction may occur on the east
edge of the course it may be possible that holes on the west edge of the
course could be kept in play. Should this occur, golfers may be exposed
to minor impacts from temporary construction noise, access impairment
and construction-generated dust. Precise impacts will be determined
once it has been decided which program option will be followed for the
placement of the pipeline through the golf course i.e. in the bottom of the
-24-
Santa Ana River, along the east levee of the River or on streets adjacent
to the golf course.
7. Portions of the Santa Ana River will be temporarily disrupted during
pipeline construction. The entire trail between Gisler Avenue in Costa
Mesa and 17" Street in Santa Ana will be temporarily disturbed during
conveyance pipeline excavation and installation if the pipeline is installed
on the east side of the River. A short portion of the trail between Katella
Avenue and Taft Avenue in the City of Orange will also be temporarily
impacted at the point where the pipeline crosses from the east site to the
west side of the River. However, the trail will be kept open during
construction by detouring trail traffic around the construction areas. If
pipeline Option B were selected for installation of the pipeline one mile
less of the Trail would be excavated for pipeline installation.
8. The new injection wells and the water pipelines to supply these wells will
be constructed in the road rights-of-way adjacent to the north edge of
Lagenbeck Park along Garfield Avenue in Huntington Beach, the south
edge of Estancia park in Costa Mesa. The construction would also be
within the flood control right-of-way adjacent to the east edge of Alevalos
Park in Huntington Beach. These parks will not be physically impacted
but park users may be subject to temporary construction noise and
potential construction-generated dust. Park patrons will also be able to
move away from noisy areas near the injection welllpipeline construction
areas.
9. Part of Mesa Verde Golf Course may be directly impacted during the
construction period if pipeline or injection wells are installed along the
south edge of the course.
10. During refurbishment of existing injection wells along Ellis Avenue, the
construction zone will be adjacent to Ellis Park and would result in
temporary noise and dust impacts to the edge of this park.
P. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
The potentially significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System on
Environmental Justice are described on pages 3-194 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of the Groundwater
Replenishment System would result in the following impacts:
1. No housing units or businesses will be displaced by construction of any of
the facilities called for by the Groundwater Replenishment System.
-25-
2. Residential areas which abut the project construction zones vary from
mobile home parks to multi-family, to middle and upper middle income
single family homes. All of these residences will be equally impacted by
dust, noise traffic and other construction related impact due to the
development of System facilities.
3. The benefit of protection from seawater intrusion would be greatest for the
groundwater pumps in Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa and Dyer Road well
field areas.
C. INDIAN TRUST ASSETS
The potential significant effects of the Groundwater Replenishment System project on
Indian Trust Assets are described on pages 3-196 of the Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS.
Approval of the Proposed Action and the construction of Groundwater Replenishment
System will not impact Indian Trust Assets since none are known to exist in Orange
County or in any of the cities where Groundwater Replenishment System improvements
would be located.
SECTION 4. For the following significant impacts, either no feasible mitigation
measures are available, or the District will implement certain feasible mitigation
measures, but residual impacts will still be significant or potentially significant. For
these impacts, specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible other
mitigation measures or alternatives that may have been identified in the Final Program
EIR. Specifically, the proposed Groundwater Replenishment System project will result
in the following significant unavoidable adverse impacts.
• Some production wells within the vicinity of project could fall within the
minimum distance and travel time criteria for reclaimed water recharge or
injection and have to be abandoned.
• Emissions from construction activities for the Groundwater Replenishment
System will exceed the SCAQMD's Threshold of Significance for NOx.
-26-
• Should the Option B alignment for the major conveyance pipeline from the
advanced water treatment plant to the Santa Ana River corridor be chosen,
then numerous driveways to commercial and industrial businesses along
portions of Mt. Langeley Street, Spencer Avenue, Mt. Baldy; Street and
Condor Avenue will be temporarily blocked by construction of this pipeline. It
may not be possible to preserve access to all properties all of the time,
disrupting access to these businesses.
• Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline from the
advanced water treatment plant be chosen and the roadway travel lanes on
Talbert Avenue be reduced from four to two during pipeline construction
activities, then LOS F levels would occur on Talbert Avenue during peak
hours where it is impacted by project construction activities.
• Should the major conveyance pipeline be routed around the River View Golf
Course on portions of English Road and Alona Street in Santa Ana, pipeline
construction activities could require complete closure of portions of these
narrow streets, or at a minimum, conversion to one way traffic flow.
• Should the major conveyance pipeline be constructed on the neighborhood
streets adjacent to River View Golf Course or along the Option B pipeline
alignment, then emergency access to land uses along the pipeline alignment
may be delayed.
• Chemical spills at the advanced water treatment plant and localized flooding
from ruptured pipelines could occur during a catastrophic seismic events
which exceed magnitudes used in the seismic design of project facilities.
• Groundwater Replenishment System construction noise levels would likely
be noticeable to residential land uses adjacent to the areas where System
_27_
facilities are installed even if local noise ordinances are adhered to or limits
are placed on the time of day when project construction may occur.
SECTION 5. No significant impacts were identified in the Final Program EIR,
project changes or alterations, which require mitigation by another public agency, and
not the District.
SECTION 6. The District will implement the following mitigation measures for
impacts identified as less than significant in the Final Program EIR.
A. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Land Use and Planning are:
LU-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army /Corps. of Engineers
(ACOE) on their plans to install project improvements along and within the
Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the ACOE
for review and approval before any project construction begins.
LU-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control
District on their plans to install project improvements under and along the
Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for review and
approval before any project construction begins. The OCWD/OCSD shall also
enter into an agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and
the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project construction begins.
The agreement shall address any economic loss to the District during the
construction of project improvements.
LU-3 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with Caltrans District 12 on their plans to
install project improvements under the San Diego, Santa Ana, Garden Grove
Orange and Riverside Freeways. The OCWD/OCSD will also obtain the
necessary Caltrans Encroachment Permit before any project construction
begins under any of these freeways.
LU-4 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,
the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control
District and the City of Fountain Valley on their plans to install project
improvements along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel.
The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for the
use of this flood control channel before any project construction begins.
-28-
LU-5 Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,
then the OCWD/OCSD shall contact Southern California Edison and the owner
of the Village Nurseries on their plans to install project improvements along
Garfield Avenue. The OCWD/OCSD shall ensure that construction plans
provide for parking for and access to the Edison substation and nursery during
project construction activities.
LU-6 Should the option be selected of construction through River View Golf Course,
the OCWD/OCSD will negotiate a construction easement for construction of
project improvements prior to the construction of any improvements.
Compensation for business loss during project construction activities shall be
addressed in this agreement.
LU-7 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all local jurisdictions
through which the major conveyance pipelines will pass, including the cities of
Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange and Anaheim to provide for
coordination between these jurisdictions, the OCWD/OCSD and sponsors of
future proposed development.
LU-8 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the
SCRRA that project improvements will be installed under their railroads in the
Orange/Anaheim area. Railroad officials will be given a written project
construction schedule.
LU-9 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents, business and industry owners
adjacent to the streets and Santa Ana River levees where project
improvements are installed with a notice that project improvements will be
made adjacent to their homes, businesses or industries. The project
construction contractor will provide access to all residences, businesses and
industries impacted by project construction activities.
LU-10 The OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate with the cities of Fountain Valley, Costa
Mesa and Santa Ana Public Works Departments about their plans to construct
project improvements within select streets within these cities. They shall
obtain the necessary encroachment permits to temporarily relocate on street
parking and construct project improvements within city streets before any
project construction takes place.
LU-11 Should the option be selected to go around the River View Golf Course on
streets within the City of Santa Ana, then the OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate
construction plans with the City's Public Works Department. They shall also
obtain the necessary encroachment permit to temporarily relocate on street
parking and construct project improvements within City streets before any
project construction takes place.
-29-
LU-12 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,
the OCWD/OCSD shall notify the City of Fountain Valley that the project will be
constructed adjacent to the Citys Maintenance Yard and Police Training
Facility, providing the supervisor of this facility with a written project
construction schedule.
LU-13 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all federal, state, county
and city jurisdictions through which the project will pass regarding the selected
project alternative, construction plans and schedules. This will also allow for
coordination between the local jurisdictions and the OCWD/OCSD regarding
traffic detours, public notification and coordination with sponsors of any
concurrent development along the project route. The OCWD/OCSD will also
work with these effected local jurisdictions and planning agencies to
incorporate measures to reduce impacts created by project construction
activities. These measures may include land closures, detour signs, flagman
and use of dust control measures such as water trucks.
LU-14 Final construction documents and a copy of the project plans will be made
available by the OCWD/OCSD to interested and impacted federal, state,
county and city agencies to ensure compatibility with future land use
scenarios.
LU-15 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate County and city parks departments
where the project will traverse or be directly adjacent to a County or city park.
The parks departments shall be provided with a written schedule for
completion of project improvements adjacent to the park and the project
contractor will provide access to the park during project construction activities.
LU-16 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate school districts where the project will
potentially impact a school or access to a school. The school district shall be
provided with a written schedule for completion of project improvements
adjacent to the school and the project contractor will provide access to the
school during project construction activities.
LU-17 The OCWD/OCSD will negotiate construction easements with any affected
property owners. Compensation for relocation or temporary relocation of
property owners during project construction activities shall also be addressed
in this agreement if necessary.
LU-18 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents and business owners adjacent to the
streets and Santa Ana River levees where project improvements are installed
with a written project construction schedule. The project construction
contractor shall provide access to these land uses during project construction
activities.
-30-
B. SOCIOECONOMIC/GROWTH INDUCEMENT
The Groundwater Replenishment System does not result in impacts related to
population, housing and/or employment that have not been accounted for by SCAG in
its regional growth forecasts. Therefore, no mitigation is required.
C. GEOLOGY
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Proposed Action that would mitigate
for impacts to Geology are:
G-1 The OCWD/OCSD will ensure that all structures for the Groundwater
Replenishment System, including the treatment, conveyance and Water
Factory 21/expansion of the Seawater Intrusion Barrier components, are
designed and constructed in compliance with current engineering practices,
including the Uniform Building Code and all applicable seismic engineering
guidelines.
D. WATER RESOURCES
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Water Resources are:
SURFACE WATER/FLOODING
SWA The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE) on their plans to install Groundwater Replenishment System
improvements along and within the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project
plans shall be submitted to the ACOE for review and approval before any
project construction begins.
SW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control
District on their plans to install project improvements under and along the
Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for review and
approval before any project construction begins. Work on the agreement shall
commence prior to final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System.
The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for use
of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any
project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss
to the District during the construction of project improvements.
SW-3 Should major conveyance pipeline Option C be selected, the OCWD/OCSD
will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to
install improvements within or along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood
Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with
-31-
the County for the use of this flood control channel before any project
construction begins.
SW-4 All Groundwater Replenishment System facilities proposed to be constructed
within or adjacent to the Santa Ana River or other flood control channels, or
will be construct across a flood control channel, shall be constructed during the
dry season (normally April through December). Flood control facilities
disturbed by system construction shall be fully restored to their original design
condition prior to the onset of the rainy season (October 15) so that the flood
control capacity of the affected OCFLD facilities are not comprised.
SW-5 Any pipeline constructed in the bottom or levees of flood control facilities shall
be designed in a manner which protects them from undermining or scour due
to flows in the channel.
SW-6 A Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act Permit shall be required for
construction of any Groundwater Replenishment System improvements within
the Santa Ana River.
SW-7 Best Management Practices, including sandbagging, manufactured channels
or swales, diversion velocity dissipators, desilling basins, detention/retention
ponds shall be used to prevent sedimentation from the construction of the
Groundwater Replenishment System.
SW-8 Release of treated water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to the
Santa Ana River shall occur only in event of an extreme emergency.
SW-9 The Groundwater Replenishment System shall comply with the requirements of
the state non-point NPDES program.
GROUNDWATER
GW-1 Should modeling and field studies indicate that any production wells are within
the minimum distance and travel time criteria for proximity to reclaimed water
recharge or injection, these wells shall be abandoned or limited to approved
non-potable uses. Wells which are abandoned shall be replaced by new wells
constructed outside to the area of influence.
GW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control
District on their plans to install project improvements under the Santa Ana
River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel and the east and
west River levees. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the OCFCD
for review and approval before any project construction takes place. The
OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County of Orange
-32-
for use of the Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel
before any project construction begins.
MARINE ENVIRONMENT
No impacts to the beneficial uses of ocean waters are expected to occur as a result the
proposed Groundwater Replenishment System or its alternatives. Therefore, no
mitigation is required. The OCSD will continue to implement their existing source
control monitoring programs to detect any changes in the influent and effluent quality
which could impact regulatory compliance.
E. AIR QUALITY
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Air Quality are:
AQ-1 Construction Contractors shall use low emission mobile construction
equipment to reduce the release of undesirable emissions. Construction
equipment shall use low sulfur fuels and shall be maintained in proper tune.
Electric power shall be used to the extent feasible.
AQ-2 Construction Contractors shall develop a trip reduction plan to achieve a 1.5
average vehicle ridership for construction employees.
AQ-3 Construction Contractors shall water active grading sites at least twice a day,
and clean appropriate construction equipment in the morning and/or evening to
reduce particulate emissions to reduce the release of fugitive dust.
AQ-4 Construction Contractors shall, as necessary, wash truck tires leaving the site
to reduce the amount of particulate matter transferred to paved streets as
required by SCAQMD Rule 403.
AQ-5 Construction Contractors shall spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads and
parking areas. Ground cover shall be reestablished on construction sites
through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be disturbed
for two months or more in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust.
AQ-6 Construction Contractors shall sweep on and off site streets if silt is carried
over to adjacent public thoroughfares, as determined by the City Engineers in
the affected jurisdictions to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public
streets.
AQ-7 Construction Contractors shall limit traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces
to 15 miles per hour or less in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust.
-33-
AQ-8 Construction Contractors shall suspend grading operations during first and
second stage smog alerts and suspend all grading operations when wind
speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour.
AQ-9 Construction contractors shall develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow
interference from construction activities.
AQ-10 During the project facility design stage, improve the thermal integrity of the
buildings and reduce the thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant
sensors.
F. TRANSPORTATION
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Transportation are:
TR-1 Where construction activities impact public roads, the contractor shall ensure
that one clear lane of traffic will be maintained at all times to facilitate public
traffic circulation and emergency vehicle access.
TR-2 The construction contractor will be responsible for preparing adequate detour
and access plans to ensure the safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians
during the construction period. These plans must ensure access to private
property at all times.
TR-3 The construction contractor will be responsible for seeking approval of detour
and access plans by the public works department in whose jurisdiction
construction work is scheduled.
TRA The construction contractor shall ensure that police, fire, transit and other
public agencies who may be impacted by roadway detours or street closure, be
advised prior to initiating construction activities.
TR-5 The construction contractor shall obtain a Public Work Permit from the City of
Fountain Valley for the development of any Groundwater Replenishment
System facilities in City street rights-of-way. The construction contractor shall
comply with all conditions set forth in the permit e.g., hours of operation, lane
closures, trench length and pavement replacement etc.
G. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
No significant impacts to biological resources will result since construction will occur in
areas which are already disturbed by urban development, flood control, groundwater
recharge, maintenance or in non native and/or ornamental landscaping conditions.
-34-
H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for Energy impacts are:
EM-1 Project design and construction shall consider energy efficiency as an
important factor in the selection of equipment, including treatment processes,
lighting, heating and air conditioning equipment.
EM-2 Project design shall incorporate the use of variable speed pumps to optimize
energy use.
There are no significant impacts on mineral resources that require mitigation.
I. HAZARDS /RISK OF UPSET
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Hazards and Risks of Upset are:
HZ-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall properly site, design, operate and maintain
sodium hypochlorite storage tanks so as to minimize the potential for sudden
releases in the event of a tank failure caused by seismic events or other
reasons in the project area. At a minimum the design of the tanks shall
conform to standards and codes of the State of California and local
jurisdictions affected by the project.
HZ-2 The OCWD and OCSD shall ensue that the proposed pipeline features,
including pumping stations, recharge basins and water treatment facilities shall
be designed, constructed, operated and maintained according to the most
appropriate seismic standards and guidelines. At a minimum the design of the
pipelines shall conform to standards and codes of the State of California and
local jurisdictions affected by the project.
HZ-3 An adequate seismic Emergency Response Plan shall be prepared by; the
OCWD and OCSD for each feature of the Proposed Project including pipeline
segment and injection wells. The plan shall be approved by local agencies
prior to operation of each project phase.
HZ-1 An adequate Emergency Response Plan shall be developed by; the OCWD
and OCSD and approved by appropriate agencies to address disinfectant
chemicals and other hazardous materials which will be used, stored and/or
transported in association with the construction and operation of the Proposed
Project.
-35-
HZ-5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the OCWD and/or OCSD shall be
required to submit tot he Cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach and
Costa Mesa a preliminary environmental site assessment which addresses the
potential for site contamination from land uses on and adjacent to the
construction areas. If potential contamination issues are identified during the
preliminary site assessment, OCWD and/or the OCSD shall be required to
conduct additional investigation and remediation as required by the
jurisdictional state or local agency.
HZ-6 Any use of hazardous materials on the Propose Project site must be conducted
in accordance with applicable federal, state and local regulations.
HZ-7 The OCWD shall develop an emergency response plan to address major
release of chemicals used on the site. The emergency response plan shall be
approved by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and Orange County
Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Units.
J. NOISE
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
project that would mitigate for impacts to Noise are:
N-1 The Construction Contractor shall be required to adhere to all Noise Ordinance
provisions of the cities of Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Orange,
Anaheim, Huntington Beach and the County of Orange. Additionally, noisy
construction within 500 feet of existing homes shall be limited to the hours of
7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekdays, 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays and not at any
time on Sunday or Federal holidays.
N-2 Barriers shall be installed around the noise sources or directly between the
construction area and the nearest homes to shield these residents from direct
noise exposure from the construction activities. The height of the barriers is
crucial in terms of effectiveness, the higher the barrier the more the more the
noise reduction. Types of shielding include leaded blankets, an acoustic
blanket, or several layers of plywood.
N-3 Mufflers shall be used on all construction equipment.
N-4 Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented where
feasible. Loud equipment shall not be separated and not grouped in one
location. Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be placed away
from sensitive receptors.
N-5 A detailed noise control plan shall be required to determine the need for any
additional specific noise mitigation measures at the advanced water treatment
-36-
plant site. The plan shall include post-construction monitoring to determine if
the plan's noise goals have been met.
N-6 The construction contractor shall coordinate with the Santa Ana Public Works
Agency, before any final haul routes and construction study areas for the
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities are established. Changes in
proposed haul routes and construction study areas shall be made is requested
by the Public Works Agency.
N-7 'Prior to the commencement of construction and ongoing during construction,
property owners/residents/businesses within and adjacent to construction
activity shall be notified of the specific construction activity and associated
schedule. Additionally, signs shall be posted at strategic locations within the
Project area, specifically within the city limits of Anaheim; easily visible at all
times during construction. The notifications and signs shall identify the
address, "hotline" number, and name of designated person to contact for the
purpose of responding to questions or complaints during the construction
period. The notifications and signs shall also identify the hours of permissible
construction work and estimated duration.
N-8 Ongoing during construction, relative to construction activities in the City of
Anaheim, construction noise shall be limited to the City of Anaheim's Sound
Pressure Levels Ordinance (Chapter 6.7 of The Anaheim, Municipal Code)."
K. PUBLIC SERVICES
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Public Services are:
PS-1 All school district and private schools affected by construction activities will be
noted of construction schedules to lessen potential impacts to instructional
and transportation services. Ample time will be provided so affected schools
can prepare and plan for possible disruptions caused by project construction.
PS-2 Construction contractors shall ensure that adequate barriers will be
established to prevent pedestrians from entering open trenches of an active
construction area. Warnings shall also be posted sufficient distances from the
work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections
rather than having to jaywalk.
PS-3 At the end of the work day, the construction contractors shall ensure that the
work area has been secured to prevent pedestrians from walking into open
trenches or other potentially dangerous environments. Measures may include
covering the trenches and/or installing temporary fencing and safety lights.
-37-
PS-4 Construction contractors shall be responsible for providing appropriate security
measures, including the provision of security guards, for all equipment staging
and/or storage areas needed for the project.
PS-5 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction activities with
local public transit providers prior to start of work.
PS-6 To reduce the potential of inconveniencing patrons reliant on unscheduled bus
or paratransit services, construction contractors shall provide tow week's
notice to patrons in construction areas which could be affected by reduced
transit accessibility.
PS-7 The OCWD and OCSD shall keep all local police and fire jurisdictions abreast
of construction schedules.
PS-8 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction timing with local
refuse companies to ensure timely pickup of business and residential refuse.
Coordination shall continue as frequently as necessary to maintain adequate
public service.
PS-9 Construction contractors shall dispose of construction refuse at approved
disposal locations. L Contractors shall not be permitted to dispose of
construction debris in residential or business containers.
L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Utilities and Service Systems are:
U-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility
companies and jurisdictions to determine which utility lines and/or facilities will
require relocation or abandonment and replacement. This information shall be
made available to all applicable construction contractors prior to beginning
work on the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities.
U-2 The construction contractor shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility
companies and jurisdictions to determine the exact location of all underground
utilities prior to doing any work or taking action which could damage such
facilities or interfere with their operations. The construction contractor shall
protect all existing utility lines and associated substructures from damage
unless specifically noted on the plans.
U-3 Temporary replacement of utility lines will be constructed by the contractor
prior to disturbing existing lines so that disruption is only momentary. This
process shall be used during connection and later disconnection of utility lines.
-38-
U-4 All utilities which cross the pipeline trench will be protected in place, unless
otherwise indicated for relocation on the project plans. The contractor will be
required to notify the utility owner and Underground Service Alert (DIGAlert) 48
hours in advance of the construction crossing and coordinate the construction
schedule with the utility service providers. Where indicated on the plans, the
contractor will provide appropriate means to support utilities which lie within
excavated areas and which are not self-supporting.
U-5 The alignment and profile of the pipeline will be selected by OCWD and OCSD
to minimize interference with existing sanitary sewer laterals and collection
lines. The construction specifications will require that all utilities including
sewer laterals and mains be protected in place during construction and service
maintained. Where sewer lines are damaged, specifications will require that
they be repaired prior to certification of that contract's completion. Service can
be maintained by repairing the damaged sewer immediately and supporting the
repaired sewer during construction or by placing a temporary pipe across the
excavation and replacing it with permanent sewer pipe at the completion of
construction of the conveyance line.
Where interference is unavoidable, the sewer lines will be relocated and
placed in service before commencing construction of the conveyance line. All
new and relocation work shall provide separation of water and sewer lines
conforming to State Health Department regulations.
U-6 Should water and/or sewer lines need to be relocated within the area, OCWD
and OCSD will coordinate all necessary actions with the affected provider in
advance of those activities. The law protects existing utilities in place at the
time of new construction by requiring the new utility; to pay for; the cost of
relocation.
U-7 The OCWD and OCSD will coordinate with Southern California Edison and the
County of Orange to ensure that electrical power facilities will meet the
construction and operation schedule.
U-8 The construction contractor will conduct and complete all work on flood control
channels during the dry season so that the capacity; of the channels to carry
flood water during the wet season is not hindered.
U-9 The OCWD and OCSD shall investigate all available alternatives, then select
the best method of solids disposal and reduction of solid waste stream as
required in the California Integrated Waste Management Act prior to the start
of construction.
U-10 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with the Orange County Planning &
Development Services Department (Orange County Flood Control District) to
-39-
ensure compatibility; and joint use feasibility with existing and future projects.
Plan approval will also be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
requisite to County approval.
U-11 The OCWD and OCSD shall obtain the appropriate encroachment permit(s)
from all affected property owners and responsible agencies. Permits will be
obtained from CalTrans, the Orange County Planning & Development Services
Department (Orange County Flood Control District), the Army Corps of
Engineers, the County of Orange, the cities of Anaheim Costa Mesa, Fountain
Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Orange, Southern Pacific Railroad,
Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railroad, industrial park (private), River View
Golf Course and, if applicable, the Mesa Verde Golf Course prior to start of
work upon their land.
M. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
project that would mitigate for Aesthetic impacts are:
AS-1 Install a minimum 8'-12' wide landscape buffer on the OCWD site along Ward
Street and Ellis Avenue. Buffer planting shall include evergreen trees
(approximately 15'-20' on center; 15 gallon and 24" box) plus shrubs (minimum
double staggered row) to soften views from the streets into the plant site.
AS-2 Provide compatible exterior architectural design treatments to pump stations,
UV building, GAC, MF and RO facilities and all other storage, office and visitor
center structures to be built on the treatment plant site. Designs should blend
well with existing office facilities onsite and surrounding uses.
AS-3 All onsite security lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential,
business uses and away from the Santa Ana River right-of-way.
AS-4 Construction contractors shall be required to direct nighttime construction
lighting away from residential and institutional uses.
AS-5 Construction contractors shall be required to keep construction and staging
areas free of trash or other debris and to keep staging areas orderly.
AS-6 Contractors constructing the Seawater Intrusion Barrier pipeline shall be
required to restore the ground surface to original condition.
AS-7 If the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is though the River View
Golf Course, affected landscaping shall be restored. If trees with a diameter of
more than 6" are removed, they; shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 replacements
40-
for every one removed. If smaller trees are removed they shall be replaced at
a 1 to 1 ratio. Disturbed greens and rough shall be replanted.
AS-8 If the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the adjacent
neighborhood, construction contractors shall take extra care to avoid damage
to existing street trees. Damaged trees shall be treated to enhance their
survival, or replaced with large box specimens if survival cannot be assured.
N. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
project that would mitigate for impacts to Cultural Resources are:
Palentological Resources
CR-1 An Orange County Certified Paleontologist shall be retained to produce a
mitigation plan for the Groundwater Replenishment project.
CR-2 The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting to discuss the
monitoring, collecting and safety procedures for the project and shall supervise
the paleontologic monitoring during earth moving activities, including well
boring, in sensitive areas.
CR-3 Historic peat bog deposits are not considered paleontologic resources.
However, should peat bogs be found during project construction activities, the
area should be reviewed by a qualified archaeologist. The areas mapped as
Quaternary or Holocene Alluvium shall be monitored or a periodic basis to
insure older underlying sediments are not being penetrated. Artificial fill,
disturbed soils and rock and slopewash will not require monitoring.
CR4 Screening of sediments shall also be conducted under the supervision of the
paleontologist during monitoring because many significant vertebrates remains
are small. Up to a six thousand pound matrix sample may be processed by
any; single locality as recommended in the Guidelines in the Society of
Vertebrate Paleontologists.
CR-5 The paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert or
redirect grading to allow time to evaluate any exposed fossil material.
CR-6 During monitoring any scientifically significant specimens shall be properly
salvaged after evaluation by, and under the supervision of, the paleontologist.
During fossil salvage, contextual stratigraphic data shall also be collected.
This will include lithologic descriptions, localities plotted on a USGS 7.5' Series
topographic quadrangle, photographs and field notes. Specimens shall be
prepared to the point of identification, stabilized, identified and curated on a
-41-
long term loan basis in a suitable repository that has a retrievable storage
system, such as the Interpretive Center at Ralph Clark Regional Park, an
Orange County facility;, which shall have the first right-of-refusal of the
collection, or the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural.History.
CR-7 A final report shall be prepared at the end of earth moving activities and shall
include an itemized inventory of recovered fossils and appropriate stratigraphic
and locality data. This report shall be sent to the Lead Agency, signifying the
end of mitigation. Another copy shall accompany any recovered fossils, along
with field logs and photographs, to the designated repository.
CR-8 Full time monitoring shall be conducted during earth moving activities,
including well drilling, in a Pleistocene deposits.
Archaeological/Historical Resources
CR-9 A focused field survey of archaeological and historic resources shall be
conducted before construction of the conveyance pipeline and new injection
wells and pipeline to serve the wells as selected by the OCWD for the
Groundwater Replenishment System.
CR-10 For geotechnical testing along any proposed pipeline route, an Orange County
certified archaeologist shall be retained to observe their excavations and to
halt work if significant remains are found. Geotechnical testing includes
trenches, pot holes and core boring. An archeologist shall be notified at least
24 hours ahead of any geotechnical testing in order to meet the testing
schedule.
CR-11 An Orange County Certified archaeologist shall be present at the program pre-
grading meeting to discuss the monitoring, collecting and safety procedures for
the project. At that time, the archaeologist shall review the construction plans
and ensure that no construction activity; will affect identified archaeological or
historic resources.
CR-12 During program grading activities, an Orange County Certified Archaeologist
shall be retained to conduct full-time monitoring in archaeologically sensitive
areas to observe and retrieve any buried artifacts that may be uncovered.
CR-13 If human remains are found during the excavation the steps listed below from
the Native American Graves Protection Act guidelines and State law shall be
followed:
• Halt the work in the immediate area;
• Leave the remains in place;
-42-
• Contact the Orange County Water District, project personnel and the
Orange County Comer;
• The remains are not to be removed until a representative of the Coroner's
office reviews the remains in the field,
• If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Coroner
shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the most
likely descendent from the Native American Community is to be informed;
and
• The final deposition of remains shall be coordinated by representatives of
the property owner and the most likely descendent.
CR-14 If prehistoric artifacts or a buried deposit is uncovered, the Orange County
certified archaeologist shall temporarily halt construction activities for the
immediate area until the archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the
find. Implementation of a recovery program would follow, if the remains are
determined potentially eligible to the National Register.
CR-15 A final monitoring report, including an itemized inventory and pertinent field
data, shall be sent to the OCWD/OCSD as well as copies of the report to the
Archaeological Information Center at the University of California, Los Angeles,
and to the County of Orange Public Facilities & Resources Department-
Harbors Beaches & Parks Division.
CR-16 Any recovered artifacts shall be properly collected with locations plotted on a
USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle, with photographs and field notes of the
find. Artifacts will be identified, and artifact catalog prepared, and artifacts
stabilized for curation. Any recovered artifacts shall be offered, on a first right-
of-refusal basis, to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an
educational and research interest in the materials. The Anthropology Museum
at California State University, Fullerton would be an appropriate repository to
receive any artifacts collected in the study area.
O. RECREATION
Conditions and other measures applicable to the Groundwater Replenishment System
that would mitigate for impacts to Recreation are
R-1 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will
provide a written construction schedule to all the cities having parks adjacent
to the construction zone and to the County of Orange advising when project
construction may impact park and recreation facilities within their jurisdictions.
43-
The construction schedule will also be provided to the Mesa Verde and River
View golf courses.
R-2 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will
negotiate for construction and access easements and encroachment permits
with the operators of the River View Golf Course and if applicable, the Mesa
Verde Golf Course, an with entities owning land in the area of the Groundwater
Replenishment System. Landowners and responsible agencies include
CalTrans, Orange county Flood control District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
County of Orange, the cities of Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove,
Huntington Beach and Orange, Southern Pacific Railroad, Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe Railway and a private industrial park. Compensation for business
loss shall be addressed in the agreements.
R-3 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will
prepare will prepare a plan to detour users of the Santa Ana River Bikeway
around the construction areas so that the paved trail remains open during
construction. The Districts shall work with the County of Orange and local
bicycle group on the preparation of a trail detour plan.
At a minimum, the following County Departments shall be contacted to help
prepare trail detour plan:
• Public Facilities and Resources Department, Harbors, Beaches and Parks
Department
• Planning and Development Services Department. At a minimum, the
following local bicycle group shall be contacted.
• Orange County Bicycle Coalition, 630 S. Glassel Street, Suite 100, Orange,
CA 91666, (714) 288-9130.
The final trail detour plan shall be submitted to the above groups for review and
comment.
R-4 The construction contractor will ensure that adequate barriers are established
to prevent recreational facility users from entering the active project
construction area.
R-5 Following construction, the construction areas in golf courses and the Santa
Ana River Trail will be restored to their original condition and re-landscaped as
appropriate.
-44-
P. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
There are no adverse environmental justice impacts that will arise from implementation
of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Therefore, no mitigation measures have
been proposed for this project.
Q. INDIAN TRUST ASSETS
No impacts will be created on Indian Trust Assets by construction of facilities proposed
as part of the Groundwater Replenishment System. Therefore, no mitigation measures
are proposed.
SECTION 7. The Districts hereby adopt the following mitigation monitoring and
reporting program to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures described in
Sections 3, 4, and 6.
A. Prior to design and construction, the General Manager of Water District, shall
appoint an Environmental Monitor responsible for coordinating mitigation
monitoring and reporting activities.
B. The Environmental Monitor shall review the design Project and either certify
that the facility design complies with EIR mitigation measures, or recommend
modifications necessary to achieve such compliance. In addition, prior to
obtaining bids for construction of Project, the Environmental Manager shall
review the bid documents and certify compliance with applicable mitigation
measures.
C. The Environmental Monitor shall design a checklist to demonstrate
compliance with mitigation measures in the field during construction of
Master Plan facilities. The Project manager shall assign staff responsibilities
for competing this checklist, and certify compliance with mitigation measures
during and after construction of Master Plan projects.
-45-
D. The Project Manager shall prepare reports to the General Manager on the
status of mitigation measure implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan is appended to this Resolution as
ATTACHMENT "B".
SECTION 6. The Board of Directors of District has balanced the benefits of
Project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve
Project. The Board of Directors hereby find that the occurrence of the unavoidable
significant environmental effects identified in the Final Program EIR and listed in
Sections 4 and 5 is acceptable for the following reasons:
A. The Project will provide high quality drought-proof water for the existing
population and ongoing development approved by local governments after
required environmental reviews. The District is a single-purpose agency with
the responsibility to collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within
the District's service area.
B. The Project is necessary to meet the following objectives: to provide an
environmentally sound, high quality water supply that reduces the effect of
drought on the service area, to comply with all federal and state regulatory
standards applicable to the treatment and reuse of wastewater; to encourage
wastewater Flow reduction through water conservation and reuse; to reclaim
wastewater for beneficial reuse and encourage development of markets for
reclaimed wastewater.
-46-
SECTION 9: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the
Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements
of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 24, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
47
H:A p. t %dminlBSVie wim %lg koc5DH407.doowi7m 10:06 AM
ATTACHMENT "A"
Attachment "A" to Resolution 99-01 consists of the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report which is in two volumes, the Draft and the
Final EIR
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt programs to
monitor and report on the implementation of mitigation measures that have been
adopted to avoid or reduce environmental impacts of projects that agencies have
approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Consequently, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been developed for
use by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD) for the Groundwater Replenishment System.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
The basic elements of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are the
mitigation measures identified by each impact category addressed in Section 3.0 of the
Program EIR/Tier 1 EIS and the refinements, changes or additions to those measures
which resulted from the Response to Comments received on the EIR/EIS. The
development of the program was based on the following procedures necessary to
initiate and complete the monitoring process.
• Identification of the specific mitigation measures proposed for the project from
Section 3.0 of the Program EIR and Tier 1 EIS and refinements, changes or
additions to those measures in the Response to Comments report/Final EIR/EIS.
• Identification of the key periods and events in the project implementation schedule.
• Identification of the key personnel and agencies responsible for environmental
monitoring.
• Monitoring of the implementation of the mitigation measures and documentation that
the measures have been properly and thoroughly implemented.
• Development of the written document on the implementation of all the mitigation
measures, identification of any areas of non-compliance, and proposed activities to
bring the project into compliance with the mitigation monitoring program.
AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE AND ENFORCE A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
The OCWD and OCSD has the authority to require and enforce the provisions of
Califomia Resource Code Section 21081.6. The Groundwater Replenishment System,
is a joint project of the OCWD and the OCSD and these Districts will be responsible for
approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and for preparing the
written report documenting the implementation of System mitigation measures.
-1-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
Table 1 summarizes the mitigation measures which have been adopted for the project,
specifies the timing for implementation of each measure and identifies the responsible
parties for ensuring implementation and the satisfactory completion of each measures.
The procedures for implementing the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are:
Monitoring Procedures
1. An Environmental Monitor, appointed by OCWD/OCSD, will be
responsible for coordinating review of project plans and activities,
construction sites and/or operations to ensure that the mitigation
measures are properly and thoroughly implemented through the course of
the project.
2. Written documentation that each mitigation measure in Table 1 has been
implemented will be prepared. This documentation can be on a
OCWD/OCSD mitigation monitoring checklist or a similar form that clearly
indicates the timing or schedule for implementation, whether the measure
has, in fact, been implemented, or in the case of measures that are
ongoing, that a process has been developed to ensure continued
implementation of the measure.
Reporting Procedures
1. The Environmental Monitor appointed by the OCWD/OCSD on this
project will be responsible for periodically reviewing the program in Table
1 with the OCWD/OCSD Environmental Compliance Advisor.
2. The Environmental Monitor will prepare a written report for the
OCWD/OCSD documenting the completion of the implementation of all
the mitigation measures consistent with the schedule and agency
approvals indicated in Table 1. For those measures not implemented or
that do not fully comply with mitigation measures included in Table 1, an
explanation of the areas of noncompliance will be prepared, including a
proposal to bring those elements of the project into compliance with the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
The final report on the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will be kept
on file at the following addresses
Orange County Water District Orange County Sanitation District
10500 Ellis Avenue 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Fountain Valley, CA 92708
-2-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLET
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MMGA71ON MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
Land Use and Planning
LU-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S.Army/Corps of Engineers(ACOE)on their plans to install OCWD(OCSD Pre-Construction
project improvements along and within the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to ACOE
the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins.
LU-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construcion
project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for OCFCD
review and approval before any project construction begins. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an
agreement with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before
any project construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the Flood Control District
during the construction of project improvements.
LU-3 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with CalTrans District 12 on their plans to install project improvements OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
under the San Diego,Santa Ana,Garden Grove Orange and Riverside Freeways. The OCWD/OCSD will also CalTrans District 12
obtain the necessary CalTram Encroachment Permit before any project construction begins under any ofthese
freeways.
LU4 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate OCDW/OCSD Pre-Construction
with the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Fountain Valley on their plans to install project OCFCD
improvements along a portion of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also City of Fountain Valley
enter into an agreement with the County for the use of this flood control channel before any project concoction
begins.
LU-5 Should the Option A alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,then the OCWD/OCSD shall OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
contact Southern California Edison and the owner of the Village Nurseries on their plans to install project Southern California
improvements along Garfield Avenue. The OCWD/OCSD shall ensure that construction plans provide for Edison
parking for and access to the Edison substation and nursery during project construction activities. Village Nurseries
LU6 Should the option be selected of construction through River View Golf Course,the OCWD/OCSD will negotiate OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
a construction easement for construction of project improvements prior in the construction of airy improvements. River VIeW Golf
Compensation for business loss during project construction activities shall be addressed in this agreement
LU-7 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all local jurisdictions through which the major OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
conveyance pipelines will pass,including the cities of Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa, Santa Ana,Orange and Cities of Fountain
Anaheim to provide for coordination between these jurisdictions,the OCWD/OCSD and sponsors of future Valley, Costa Mesa,
proposed development. Santa Ana, Orange,
Anaheim
-3-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
LU-8 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the SCRRA that project improvements OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
will be installed under their railroads in the Orange/Anaheim area. Railroad officials will be given a written UPRR
project construction schedule. SCRRA
LU-9 The OCWD/OCSD will provide residents,business and industry owners adjacent to the streets and Santa Ana OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
River levees where project improvements are installed with a notice that project improvements will be made
adjacent to their homes,businesses or industries. The project construction contractor will provide access to all
residences,businesses and industries impacted by project construction activities.
LU-10 The OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate with the cities of Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa and Santa Ana Public Works OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
Departments about their plans to concoct project improvements within select streets within these cities. They Fountain Valley,Costa
shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits to temporarily relocate on street parking and construct project Mesa and Santa Ana
improvements within city streets before any project censmnction takes place. Public Works
Department
LU-11 Should the option be selected to go around the River View Golf Course on streets within the City of Santa Ana, OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
then the OCWD/OCSD shall coordinate construction plans with the City's Public Works Department. They City of Santa Ana
shall also obtain the necessary encroachment permit to temporarily relocate on great parking and concoct
project improvements within City streets before any project construction takes place.
LU-12 Should the Option C alignment for the major conveyance pipeline be selected,the OCWD/OCSD shall notify the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
City of Fountain Valley that the project will be constructed adjacent to the City's Maintenance Yard and Police City of Fountain Valley
Training Facility,providing the supervisor of this facility with a written project construction schedule.
LU-13 The OCWD/OCSD will notify the planning agencies of all federal,stale,county and cityjurisdictions through OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
which the project will pass regarding the selected project alternative,construction plans and schedules. This Federal. State, County
will also allow for coordination between the local jurisdictions and the OCWD/OCSD regarding traffic detours, City Planning Agencies
public notification and coordination with sponsors of any concunent development along the project route. The
OC WD/OCSD will also work with these effected local jurisdictions and planning agencies to incorporate
measures to reduce impacts created by project concoction activities. These measures may include land
closures,detour signs,flagman and use of dust control measures such as water trucks.
LU-14 Final construction documents and a copy of the project plans will be made available by the OCWD/OCSD to OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
interested and impacted federal,state,county and city agencies to ensure compatibility with future land use Federal, State, County, During
scenarios. City Agencies Construction
-4-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment 8
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
LU-15 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate County and city parks departments where the project will traverse or OCWD/OCSD PIConstmction
be directly adjacent to a County or city park. The parks departments shall be provided with a written schedule County and City Parks During project
for completion of project improvements adjacent to the park and the project contractor will provide access to the Departments Construction
park during project construction activities.
LU-16 The OCWD/OCSD will notify appropriate school districts where the project will potentially impact a school or OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
access to a school. The school district shall be provided with a written schedule for completion of project School Districts
improvement adjacent to the school and the project contractor will provide access to the school during project
construction activities.
LU-17 The OC WD/OCSD will negotiate construction easement with any affected property owners. Compensation for OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
relocation or temporary relocation of property owners during project construction activities shall also be Affected Property/ During
addressed in this agreement if necessary. Owners Construction
LU-18 The OCWD/OCSD will provide resident and business owners adjacent to the street and Santa Ana River OCWD/OCSD
levees where project improvements are installed with a written project construction schedule. The project Affected Residents/
construction contractor shall provide access to these land uses during project construction activities. Businesses Owners
SocioeconomidCrowth Inducement
• None.
Geology
G-1 The OCWD/OCSD will ensure that all structures for the Groundwater Replenishment System including the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
treatment,conveyance and Water Factory 2I/expansion of the Seawater Intrusion Barter component,are
designed and constructed in compliance with current engineering practices,including the Uniform Building
Code and all applicable seismic engineering guidelines.
Water Resources
SW-1 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE)on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
Groundwater Replenishment System improvement along and within the Seam Ana River. A ropy of all project ACOE
plans shall be submitted to the ACOE for review and approval before any project construction begins.
•5-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Palty(s) Timing
SW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
project improvements under and along the Santa Ana River. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted for OCFCD
review and approval before any project construction begins. Work on the agreement shall commence prior to County of Orange
final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The OCWD/OCSD shag also enter into an agreement
with the County for use of the Santa Ana River and the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel before any project
construction begins. The agreement shall address any economic loss to the Flood Control District during the
construction of project improvements.
SW-3 Should major conveyance pipeline Option C be selected,the OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange OCWD/OCSD Pre-Constntclion
County Flood Control District on their plans to install improvements within or along a portion of the Fountain OCFCD
Valley Flood Control Channel. The OCWD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the County for the Orange County
ma of this flood control channel before any project construction begins.
SW4 All Groundwater Replenishment System facilities proposed to be constructed within or adjacent to the Santa Ana OCWD/OCSD During
River or other flood control channels,or will be constructed across a flood control channel,shall be constructed Construction Contractor Construction
during the dry season(normally April through December).Flood control facilities disturbed by system
construction shall be fully restored to their original design condition prior to the onset of the rainy season
(October 15)an that the flood control capacity of the affected OCFCD facilities are not compromised.
SW-5 Any pipeline constructed in the bottom or levees of flood control facilities shall be designed in a manner which OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
protects them from undermining or scour due to flows in like channel.
SW-6 A Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act Permit shall be required for constuction of any Groundwater OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
Replenishment System improvements within the Santa Ana River. ACOE
SW-7 Bert Management Practices,including sandbagging,manufactured channels or swales,diversion velocity OCWD/OCSD During
dissipmors,desilting basins,detentiontretention ponds shall be used to prevent sedimentation from the Construction Contractor Construction
construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System.
SW-8 Release of treated water from the Groundwater Replenishment System to the Santa Ana liver shall occur only in OCWD/OCSD Post-Construction
event of an extreme emergency.
SW-9 The Groundwater Replenishment System shall comply with the requirements of the state non-point source OCWD/0C5D Post-Conshuctpon
NPDES program.
Groundwater
GW-I Should modeling and field studies indicate that any production wells are within the minimum distance and OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
travel time criteria for proximity to reclaimed water recharge or injection,these wells shall be abandoned or During
limited to approved non-potable uses. Wells which are abandoned shall be replaced by new wells constructed Construction
outside to the area of influence.
-6-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
GW-2 The OCWD/OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Flood Control District on their plans to install OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
project improvements under the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel and the OCFCD
east and west River levees. A copy of all project plans shall be submitted to the OCFCD for review and approval County of Orange
before any project construction takes place. The OC WD/OCSD shall also enter into an agreement with the
County of Orange for use of the Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel before any
project construction begins.
Air Quality
AQ-1 Construction Contractors shall use low emission mobile construction equipment to reduce the release of Construction Contractor During
undesirable emissions. Construction equipment shall use low sulfur fuels and shall be maintained in proper Construction
tune. Electric power shall be used to the extent feasible.
AQ-2 Construction Contractors shall develop a trip reduction plan to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership for Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
construction employees.
AQ-3 Construction Contractors shall water active grading sites at least twice a day,and clean appropriate construction Construction Contractor During Construction
equipment in the morning and/or evening to reduce pardculaic emissions to reduce the release of fugitive dust.
AQ4 Construction Contractors shall,as necessary,wash truck tires leaving the site to reduce the amount of particulate Construction Contractor During Construction
matter transferred to paved streets as required by SCAQMD Rule 403.
AQ-5 Construction Contractors shall spread soil binders on site,unpaved roads and parking areas. Ground cover shall Construction Contractor During Construction
be reestablished on construction sites through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be
disturbed for two months or more in order to reduce the release of fugitive dust
AQ6 Construction Contractors shall sweep on and off site streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction Contractor During Construction
thoroughfares,as determined by the City Engineers in the affected jurisdictions to reduce the amount of
particulate matter on public streets.
AQ-7 Construction Contractors shall limit traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less in Construction Contractor During Construction
order to reduce the release of fugitive dust
AQ-S Construction Contractors shall suspend grading operations during first and second stage smog alerts and Construction Contractor During Construction
suspend all grading operations when wind speeds(as instantaneous gusts)exceed 25 miles per hour.
AQ-9 Construction contractors shall develop a traffic plan to minimise traffic Bow interference from construction Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
activities.
AQ-10 During the project facility design stage,improve the thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce the thermal OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
-7-
Mitigation Manitonng Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Atlaehmenl8
TABLE I
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
Transportation
TR-I Where construction activities impact public roads,the contractor shall ensure that one clear lane of traffic will Construction Contractor During ConsWetion
be maintained at all times to facilitate public traffic circulation and emergency vehicle access.
TR-2 The construction contractor will be responsible for preparing adequate detour and access plans to ensure the safe Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
movement of vehicles and pedestrians during the construction period. These plans must ensure access to private During Construction
property at all tima.
TR-3 The construction contractor will be responsible for caking approval of detour and access plans by the public Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
works department in whose jurisdiction construction work is scheduled. City Public Works
Departments
TR4 The construction contractor shall ensure that police,fire,transit and other public agencies who may be impacted Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
by roadway detours or street closure,be advised prior to initiating construction activities. Local Police, Fire,
Transit, other Public
Agencies
TR-S The construction contractor shall obtain a Public Work Permit from the City of Fountain Valley for the Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
development of any Groundwater Replenishment System facilities in City street rights-of-way. The construction City of Fountain Valley
contractor shall comply with all conditions set forth in the permit e.g.,hours of operation,lane closures,trench
length and pavement replacement etc.
TRfi Prior to commencing construction,the construction contractor shall submit a construction traffic plan for review Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
and approval by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. The traffic plan shall include a truck-haul City of Anaheim Public
route identifying the route that all construction and delivery trucks shall follow when delivering or hauling Works Departments
materials to the site;location and number of flagmen that will be on-site to safely direct public traffic around
construction traffic;and, measures that will be incorporated into the project to protect pedestrians during the
project construction. The track plan shall also include measures to prevent conflicts with events at the
Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim and the Edison International Field of Anaheim.
TR-7 Prior to commencement of construction activities,any street or lane closure should be in accordance with State Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
of California Manual of Traffic Controls standards. Detailed detour plans mun be submitted to the City of Anaheim Traffic and
Anaheim's Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval." Transportation Manager
Biological Resources
None necessary.
-8-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLET
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
Energy and Mineral Resources
EM-1 Project design and construction shall consider energy efficiency as an important factor in the selection of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
equipment,including treatment processes, lighting, heating and air conditioning equipment.
EM-2 Project design shall incorporate the use of variable speed pumps to optimize energy use. OCWD/OCSD Pre-Conslruction
Haxards/Risk of Upset
HZ-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall properly site,design,operate and maintain sodium hypochlorite storage tanks so as OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
to minimize the potential for sudden releases in the event of a tank failure caused by seismic events or other During
reasons in the project area. At a minimum the design of the tanks shall conform to standards and erodes of the Construction
State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. Post-Construction
HZ-2 The OCWD and OCSD shall ensue that the proposed pipeline features, including pumping stations,recharge OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
basins and water treatinent facilities shall be designed,censtructed,operated and maintained according to the During
most appropriate seismic standards and guidelines. At a minimum the design of the pipelines shall conform to Construction
standards and codes of the State of California and local jurisdictions affected by the project. Post-Construction
HZ-3 An adequate Seismic Emergency Response Plan shall be prepared by the OCWD and OCSD for each feature of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
the Proposed Project including pipeline segment and injection wells. The plan shall be approved by local Local Public Works/
agencies prior to operation of each project phase. Poliee/Fire Departments
HZ4 An adequate Emergency Response Plan shall be developed by the OCWD and OCSD and approved by OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
appropriate agencies to address disinfectant chemicals and other hazardous materials which will be used,stored Local FirdPolice
and/or transported in association with the caastluction and operation of the Proposed Project. Departments
HZ-S Prior to the issuance of grueling permiu,the OCWD and/or OCSD shall be required to submit to the Cities of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
Fountain Valley,Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa a preliminary environmental site assessment which Cities of Fountain Valley,
addresses the potential for site contamination from land uses on and adjacent to the construction areas. If Huntington Bach,
potential centamination issues are identified during the preliminary site assessment,OCWD/OCSD shall be Costa Mesa
required to conduct additional investigation and remediation as required by thejurisdtetional state or local
agency.
HZ6 Any use of hazardous materials on the project site must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal,state OCWD/OCSD During Construction
and local regulations. Construction Contractor Post-Construction
-9-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
HZ-7 The OCWD shall develop an emergency response plan to address major release of chemicals used on the site. OCWD Pre-Construction
The emergency response plan shall be approved by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and Orange City of Fountain Valley
County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Units. Fire Department
Orange County Fire
Department
Noise
N-1 The Construction Contractor shall be required to adhere to all Noise Ordinance provisions of the cities of Construction Contractor During
Fountain Valley,Costa Mesa,Santa Ana,Orange,Anaheim,Huntington Beach and the County of Orange. Construction
Additionally, noisy construction within 500 feet of existing homes shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m.and 7
p.m.on weekdays,7 a.m. to 6 p.m.on Saturdays and not at any time on Sunday or Federal holidays.
N-2 Barriers shall be installed around the noise sources or directly between the consWction area and the nearest Construction Contractor During Construction
homes to shield these residents from direct noise exposure from the construction activities. The height of the
barriers is crucial in terms of effectiveness,the higher the barrier the mom the noise reduction. Types of
shielding include leaded blankets,an acoustic blanket or several layers of plywood.
N-3 Mufflers shall be used on all construction equipment Construction Contractor During Construction
N4 Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented when feasible. Loud equipment shall Construction Contractor During Construction
not be separated and not grouped in one location. Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be
placed away from sensitive receptors
N-5 A detailed noise control plan shall be required to determine the need for any additional specific noise mitigation OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
measures at the advanced water treatment plant site. The plan shall include post-construction monitoring to Construction Contractor Post-Construction
delemtine if the plan's noise goals have been met.
N-6 The construction contractor shall coordinate with the Santa Ana Public Works Agency,before any final haul Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
routes and construction study areas for the Groundwater Replenishment System facilities are established. Santa Ana Public Works
Changes in proposed haul routes and construction study areas shall be made is requested by the Public Works Agency
Agency.
-10-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment
TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
N-7 Prior to the commencement of construction and ongoing during construction,property owners/residentst OCWD/OCSD Pre-Constructlon
businesses within and adjacent to construction activity shall be notified of the specific construction activity and Construction Contractor
associated schedule. Additionally,signs shall be posted at strategic locations within the Project area,specifically
within the City limits of Anaheim;easily visible at all times during construction. The notifications and signs
shall identify the address,"hotline"number,and name of designated person to contact for the purpose of
responding to questions or complaints during the construction period. The notifications and signs shall also
identify the hours of permissible construction work and estimated duration.
N-s Ongoing during construction,relative to concoction activities in the City of Anaheim,construction noise shall Construction Contractor During
be limited to the City of Anaheim's Sound Pressure Levels Ordinance(Chapter 6.7 of The Anaheim, Municipal Construction
Code).
Public Services
PS-1 All school district and private schools affected by construction activities will be notified of concoction OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
schedules to lessen potential impacts to instructional and transportation services. Ample time will be provided Local School Districts/
so affected schools can prepare and plan for possible disruptions caused by project construction. Private Schools
PS-2 Construction contractors shall ensure that adequate barriers will be established to prevent pedestrians from Construction Contractor During Concoction
entering open trenches of an active construction area. Warnings shall also be posted sufficient distances from
the work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections rather than having to jaywalk.
PS-3 At the end of the work day,the construction contractors shall ensure that the work area has been secured to Construction Contractor During Construction
prevent pedestrians from walking into open trenches or other potentially dangerous environments. Measures
may include covering the trenches and/or installing temporary fencing and safety lights.
PS4 Construction contractors shall be responsible for providing appropriate security measures,including the Construction Contractor During Construction
provision of security guards,for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for the project.
PS-3 Pipeline consmiction contractors shall coordinate construction activities with local public transit providers prior Construction Contactor Pre-Construction
to start of work. Local Public Transit
Providers
PS-6 To reduce the potential of inconveniencing patrons reliant on unscheduled bus or paalransit services, Concoction Contactor Pre-Construction
construction contractors shall provide two week's notice to patrons in construction areas which could be affected
by reduced transit accessibility.
PS-7 The OCWD and OCSD shall keep all local police and fire jurisdictions abreast of construction schedules. OCWD/OCSD Prc-Concoction
Local Police/Pire During Construction
Departments
-11-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
PS-9 Pipeline construction contractors shall coordinate construction timing with local refuse companies to ensure Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
timely pickup of business and residential refuse. Coordination shall continue as frequently as necessary to Local Refuse Companies During Construction
maintain adequate public service.
PS-9 Construction contractors shall dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations. Contractors shall Construction Contractor During Construction
not be permitted to dispose of consWction debris in residential or business containers.
Utilities and Service Systems
U-1 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinsle with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
determine which utility lines and/or facilities will require relocation or abandonment and replacement. This Local/Clty Utility
information shall be made available to all applicable construction contractors prior to beginning work on the Companies
Groundwater Replenishment System facilities.
U-2 The construction contractor shall coordinate with all potentially affected utility companies and jurisdictions to Construction Contractor Pre-Construction
determine the met location of all underground utilities prior to doing any work or taking action which could Local/City Utility
damage such facilities or interfere with their operations. The construction contractor shall protect all existing Companies
utility lines and associated substructures from damage unless specifically noted on the plans.
U-3 Temporary replacement of utility lines will be constructed by the contractor prior to disturbing existing lines so Construction Contractor During Construction
that disruption is only momentary. This process shall be used during connection and later disconnection of
utility lines.
U-4 All utilities which cross the pipeline trench will be protected in place,unless otherwise indicated for relocation Construction Contractor During Consraclon
on the project plans. The contractor will be required to notify the utility owner and Underground Service Alert DigAlert
(DigAlert)48 hours in advance of the construction crossing and coordinate the construction schedule with the
utility service providers. Where indicated on the plans,the contractor will provide appropriate means to support
utilities which lie within excavated areas and which are not self supporting.
U-S The alignment and profile of the pipeline will be selected by OCWD and OCSD to minimize interference with OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
existing sanitary sewer laterals and collection lines. The construction specifications;will require that all utilities Construction Contractor During Construction
including sewer laterals and mains be protected in place during construction and service maintained. Where
sewer lines are damaged,specifications will require that they be repaired prior to certification of that contract's
completion. Service can be maintained by repairing the damaged sewer immediately and supporting the
repaired sewer during construction or by placing a temporary pipe across the excavation and replacing it with
permanent sewer pipe at the completion of construction of the conveyance line.
Where interference is unavoidable,the sewer lines will be relocated and placed in service before commencing
construction of the conveyance line. All new and relocation work shall provide separation of water and sewer
lines conforming to State Health Department regulations.
-12-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
U-6 Should water and/or sewer lines need to be relocated within the area,OCWD and OCSD will coordinate all OCWD/OCSD Pre-Consuuction
necessary actions with the affected provider in advance of those activities. The law protects existing utilities in Local Utility Providers During Construction
place at the time of new construction by requiring the new utility to pay for the cost of relocation. Construction Contractor
U-7 The OCWD and OCSD will coordinate with Souther California Edison and the County of Orange to ensure OCWD/OCSD Pre-Conslmgion
that electrical power facilities will meet the construction and operation schedule. Edison
County of Orange
U-8 The construction contractor will conduct and complete all work on flood control channels during the dry season Construction Contractor During Construction
so that the capacity;of the channels to carry flood water during the wet season is not hindered.
U-9 The OCWD and OCSD shall investigate all available alternatives,then select the best method of solids disposal OCWD/OCSD Pre-Consuuction
and reduction of solid waste stream as required in the California Integrated Waste Management Act prior to the
start of construction.
U-10 The OCWD and OCSD shall coordinate with the Orange County Planning&Development Services Department OCWD/OCSD Pre-ConsWction
(Orange County Flood Control District)to ensure compatibility;andjoint use feasibility with existing and form Orange County and
projects. Plan approval will also be required by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers requisite to County approval. Development Services
Department,ACOE
U-1I The OCWD and OCSD shall obtain the appropriate encroachment permit(s)from all affected property owners OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
and responsible agencies. Pemdts will be obtained from CalTrans,the Orange County Planning&Development CalTmns,ACOE
Services Department(Orange County Flood Control District),the Army Corps of Engineers,the County of Court of e
Orange,the cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa,Fountain Valley,Garden Grove,Huntington Beach,Orange, County Orange
Local City
Souther Pacific Railroad, Atchison,Topeka,&Santa Fe Railroad,industrial park(private),River View Golf
Course and,if applicable,the Mesa Verde Golf Course prior to start of work upon their land. UPRR/ATSFRR
River View Golf
Aesthetics/Lights end Glare
ASA Install a minimum 8'42'wide landscape buffer on the OCWD site along Ward Street and Ellis Avenue. Buffer OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
planting shall include evergn m ueee(approximately 15'-20'on center, 15 gallon and 24"box)plus shrubs During
(minimum double staggered row)to soften views from the streets into the plant site. Construction
AS-2 Provide compatible exterior architectural design treatments to pump stations,l3V building,MF and RO facilities OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
and all other storage,office and visitor center structures to be built on the treatment plant site. Designs should
blend well with existing office facilities onsite and surrounding uses.
AS-3 All onsite security lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential,business uses and away from the OCWD/OCSD Post-ConsWcllon
Santa Ana River right-of-way.
-13-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
AS-4 Construction contractors shall be required to direct nighttime construction lighting away from residential and Construction Contractor During Construction
institutional uses.
AS-5 Construction contractors shall be required to keep construction and staging areas free of trash or other debris Construction Contractor During Construction
and to keep staging areas orderly.
AS-6 Contractors constructing the Seawater Intrusion Barrier pipeline shall be required to reslore the ground surface Construction Contractor During Construction
to original condition.
AS-7 H the final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the River View Golf Course,affected landscaping OCWD/OCSD Post-Construction
shall be restored. Iftrees with a diameter of more than 6"are removed,they shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 Construction Contractor
replacements for every one removed. If smaller trees are removed they shall be replaced at a 1 to 1 ratio.
Disturbed greens and rough shall be replanted.
AS-8 Ifthe final route for the major conveyance pipeline is through the adjacent neighborhood,construction Construction Contractor During Construction
contractors shall take extra can:to avoid damage to existing street trees. Damaged trees shall be treated to Post-Construction
enhance their survival,or replaced with large box specimens if survival cannot be assured.
Cultural Resources
CR-1 An Orange County Cenified Paleontologist shall be retained to produce a mitigation plan for the Groundwater OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction
Replenishment System.
CR-2 The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting to discuss the monitoring,collecting and safety OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction
procedures for the project and shall supervise the paleontologic monitoring during earth moving activities, project Paleontologist
including well boring,in sensitive areas.
CR-3 Historic peat bog deposits are not considered paleontologic resources. However, should peat bogs be found OC WD/OCSD During Construction
during project construction activities,the area should be reviewed by a qualified archaeologist. The areas Project Archeologist
mapped as Quaternary or Holocene Alluvium shall be monitored or a periodic basis to insure older underlying
sediments are not being penetrated. Artificial fill,disturbed soils and rock and slopewash will not require
monitoring.
CR-4 Screening of sediments shall also be conducted under the supervision of the paleontologist during monitoring Project Paleontologist During Construction
because many significant vertebrates remains are small. Up to a six thousand pound matrix sample may be
processed by any;single locality as recommended in the Guidelines in the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists.
CR-5 The paleontological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert or redirect grading to allow time to Project Paleontologist During Constructum
evaluate my exposed fossil material.
-14-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLET
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
CRfi During monitoring,any scientifically significant specimens shall be properly salvaged after evaluation by,and Project Paleontologist During Construction
under the supervision of the paleontologist. During fossil salvage,contextual strxtigraphic data shall also be Post-Construction
collected. This will include lithologic descriptions,localities plotted on a USGS 7.5' Series topographic
quadrangle,photographs and field notes. Specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification,stabilized,
identified and curated on a long tern loan basis in a suitable repository that has a retrievable storage system,
such as the Interpretive Center at Ralph Clark Regional Park,an Orange County facility;,which shall have the
first right-of-refusal of the collection,or the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History
CR-7 A final report shall be prepared at the end of earth moving activities and shall include an itemized inventory of project Paleontologist Post-Constrction
recovered fossils and appropriate suatigraphic and locality data. Tbis report shall be sent to the Lead Agency, OCWD/OCSD
signifying the end of mitigation. Another copy shall accompany any recovered fossils,along with field logs and
photographs,to the designated repository.
CR-8 Full time monitoring shall be conducted during earth moving activities,including wall drilling,in any OCWD/OCSD During Construction
Pleistocene deposits.
ArchaeoloeiraY istoncal Resources
CR-9 A focused field survey of archaeological and historic resources shall be conducted before construction of the OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
conveyance pipeline and new injection wells and pipeline to serve the wells as selected by the OCWD for the
Groundwater Replenishment System
CR-10 For geotechnical testing along any proposed pipeline route,an Orange County certified archaeologist shall be OCWD/0CSD Pre-Coruwction
retained to observe their excavations and to halt work if significant remains are found. Geotechnicat testing
includes trenches,pot holes and core boring. An archeologist shall be notified at least 24 hours ahead of any
geotechnical testing in order to meet the testing schedule.
CR-11 An Orange County Certified archaeologist shall be present at the program Pre-grading meeting to discuss the Project Archaeologist Pre-Construction
monitoring,collecting and safety procedures for the project At that time,the archaeologist shall review the
construction plans and ensure that no conslmcdon activity;will affect identified archaeological or historic
resources.
CR-12 During program grading activities,an Orange County Certified Archaeologist shall be retained to conduct full- Project Archaeologist Pre-Construction
time monitoring in archaeologically sensitive areas to observe and retrieve any buried artifacts that may be
uncovered.
-15-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
CR-13 If human remains am found during the excavation the steps listed below from the Native American Graves OCWD/OCSD
Protection Act guidelines and State law shall be followed: Construction Contractor
County Coroner
• Halt the work in the immediate area;
• Leave the remains in place;
• Contact the OCWD/OCSD,project personnel and the Orange County Coroner,
• The remains am not to be removed until a representative of the Coroner's office reviews the remains in the
field;
• If the Coroner determines that the remains arc prehistoric,the Coroner shall contact the Native American
Heritage Commission and the most likely descendent from the Native American Community is to be
informed;and
• The final deposition of remains shall be coordinated by representatives of the properly owner and the most
likely descendent.
CR-14 If prehistoric artifacts or a buried deposit is uncovered,the Orange County certified archaeologist shall Project Archaeologist During Construction
temporarily hall construction activities for the immediate aura until the archaeologist can evaluate the
significance of the find. Implementation of a recovery program would follow,if the remains are determined
potentially eligible to the National Register.
CR-15 A final monitoring report, including an itemized inventory and pertinent field data,shall be sent to the Project Archaeologist Post-Construction
OCWD/OCSD as well as copies of the report to the Archaeological Inf nestion Center at the University;of OCWD/OCSD
California,Los Angeles,and to the County of Orange Public Facilities&Resoumes Department-Harbors
Beaches&Parks Division.
CR-I6 Any recovered artifacts shall be properly collected with locations plotted on a USGS 7.5'topographic Project Archaeologist During Construction
quadrangle,with photographs end field notes of the find. Artifacts will be identified,and artifact catalog Post-Construction
prepared, and artifacts stabilized for cmaition. Any recovered artifacts shall be offered,on a first right-of-refusal
basis,to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an educational and research interest in the
materials. The Anthropology Museum at California State University,Fullerton would be an appropriate
repository to receive any artifacts collected in the study area.
-16-
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM—MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT PROGRAM
Responsible
Mitigation Measures Party(s) Timing
Recreation
R-1 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will provide a written construction OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
schedule to all the cities having parks adjacent to the censbuction zone and to the County of Orange advising Local City/County Parks
when project construction may impact park and recreation facilities within theirjunsdictions. The construction Departments
schedule will also be provided to the Mesa Verde and River View Golf courses.
R-2 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will negotiate for construction and OC WD/OCSD Pre-Construction
access easements and encroachment permits with the operators of the River View Golf Course and if applicable, River Vim Golf
the Mesa Verde Golf Course,an with entities owning land in the area of the Groundwater Replenishment OCFCD,ACOE
System, landowners and responsible agencies include CalTrans,Orange County Flood control District,U.S. County of Orange
Army Corps of Engineers,County of Orange,the cities of Anaheim,Fountain Valley,Garden Grove, Local Cities
Huntington Beach and Orange, Union Pacific Railroad, Atchison,Topeka&Santa Fe Railway and a private SPRR/ATSFRR
industrial park. Compensation for business loss shall be addressed in the agreements.
R-3 The Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District will prepare a plan to detour users of OCWD/OCSD Pre-Construction
the Santa Ana River Bikeway,around the construction areas so that the paved trail remains open during County of Orange
construction. The Districts shall work with the County of Orange and local bicycle group on the preparation of
trail detour plan.
At a minimum, the following County Departments shall be contacted to help prepare trail detour plan:
• Public Facilities and Resources Department, Harbors,Beaches and Parks Department
• Planning and Development Services Department.
At a minimum,the following local bicycle group shall be contacted:
• Orange County Bicycle Coalition,630 S.Glassel Street, Suite 100,Orange, CA 91666,(714)298-9130.
The final Vail detour plan shall be submitted to the above groups for review and comment.
R4 The construction contractor will ensure that adequate barriers are established to prevent recreational facility Construction Contractor During
users from entering the active project construction area. Construction
R-5 Following conswction,the censtruction areas in golf courses and the Santa Ana River Trail will be restored to Construction Contractor Post-Construction
their original condition and re-landscaped as appropriate.
Environments]Justice
None,
Indian Trust Assets
None.
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Replenishment System Attachment B
TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ACOE U.S.Amy Corps of Engineers
DigAlert Underground Service Alert
GAC Granular Activated Carbon
MF Membrane Filtration
OCFCD Orange County Flood Control District
OCSD Orange County Sanitation District
OCWD Orange County Water District
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
RO Reverse Osmosis
System Groundwater Replenishment System
USGS United States Geological Survey
UV Ultraviolet Light
H:wp.Qlal n'SSVtemlWons11999k0CSD99.01 doc
last pnMM 0X11I9910.06 AM
-tt{-
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-02
CERTIFYING FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM,
MARCH 24, 1999
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District, hereinafter referred to as "District", is presently considering the approval
of a water reclamation project, described as the Groundwater Replenishment
System, hereinafter referred to as "GWR System"; and,
WHEREAS, District and the Orange County Water District of Orange
County, California (hereinafter referred to as Water District) are the lead
agencies for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for
the GWR System, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District
CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the GWR System's environmental impacts
objectively, Water District has caused to be prepared a Draft Program
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the significant environmental
impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the GWR
System; and,
WHEREAS, Water District has consulted with other public agencies and
the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft Program
EIR as required by CEQA; and,
1
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, the Joint Cooperative Committee for
the Groundwater Replenishment System, previously formed by the District and
the Water District held a duly-noticed public hearing, to provide a further
opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the Draft
Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, Water District has objectively evaluated the comments from
public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft
Program EIR, either in full or in summary, together with Water District's
responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review and
consultation process, have been included in the Final Program EIR; and,
WHEREAS, said Final Program EIR consisting of the Draft Program EIR
and the Final Program EIR have been presented to the members of the Board of
Directors of District for review and consideration prior to the final approval of,
and commitment to, the Groundwater Replenishment System.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That the Board of Directors hereby certifies that the Final Program EIR on
the Groundwater Replenishment System has been completed in compliance with
CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and District's CEQA procedures, and that
the Board of Directors has reviewed and considered the information contained in
the Final Program EIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Groundwater
Replenishment System, and that the Final Program EIR reflects the District's
2
independent judgment and analysis. The Final Program EIR consists of the
following two documents:
1. "Draft program Environmental Impact Report (and Tier I EIS) on the
Groundwater Replenishment System" dated November 5, 1998;
and,
2. "Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the Groundwater
Replenishment System% dated February 1999.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 24, 1999.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
3
BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeebngDate ToBa.orMr.
3/74/99
" AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iterry/yimber
7
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: NIA)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
1VeM+`Wb1Fry AnVn123 W LYtlpe1NPFILESMhmapeq Ex
nme.e ewse Page t
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 2/1/99 -2/15/99 &2/16/99—2/28/99.
BA
\Ya]anValatlwp EiaVin\]]Pulbgpe\NPFI\ESdaim,Wb da
ae�,ae vwne Page 2
Claims Paid From 211199 to 2115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
17126 Advance Constructors,Inc. $ 191,548.80 Construction J-34.1,P2.35.5
17127 Black&Veatch 33,853.92 Engineering Services Pl-46
17128 Boyle Engineering Corporation 28,009.22 Engineering Services 7-27,Pt-41 &P2-48
17129 Bristol Systems, Inc. 32.153.69 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
17130 Brown and Caldwell 49.411.83 Engineering Services J-35-1
17131 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 287,027.00 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-3
17132 Carollo Engineers ID8,446.12 Engineering Services P1-43,J-25.4,J-50
17133 Delta Dental 38,001.42 Dental Insurance Plan
17134 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 72,720.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98
17135 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing,L.L.C. 72.047.54 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
17136 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 262,097.67 Construction 7-17
17137 James Martin&Co. 104.907.50 Data Integration Project
17138 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 61.821.20 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
17139 Mid-West Associates 33.727.48 Pump Supplies
17140 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 302,763.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
17141 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 106.365.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17142 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment 38.660.70 2 Vaughan Chopper Pumps
17143 Southern California Edison 58.881.37 Power
17144 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 60,075.14 Construction 7-7-1
17145 Systems Integrated 33.036.58 Construction Services J-31-3
17146 Tule Ranch/Magan Fanns 45.522.74 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17147 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 28,438.34 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
17148 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 75.202.49 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
17149 The Vantage Group LLC 2,970.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
17150 Visia 8;160.00 Computer Consulting Services
17151 A&G Industries 2.661.43 Strainer Probes
17152 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.79 Long Distance Telephone Services
17153 American Telephone&Telegraph 1,503.56 Long Distance Telephone Services
17154 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.76 Long Distance Telephone Services
17155 American Telephone&Telegraph 469.76 Long Distance Telephone Services
17156 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 5,807.73 Software
17157 Advanced Sealing&Supply Cc., Inc. 869AS Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17158 Aidce Systems,Inc. 2.562.29 Engine Supplies
17159 Air Cold Supply 42.41 Air Conditioner Repairs
17160 Air Liquids America Corporation 1,629.77 Specialty Gasses
17161 Air Products&Chemicals 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
17162 Airborne Express 78.25 Air Freight
17163 Alhambra Foundry Co Ltd 3.060.10 Manhole Frames&Covers
17164 Allied Supply Company 3,306.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 211/99 to 2115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on
17165 American Airlines 3,614.00 Travel Services
17166 American Seals West 330.31 Gaskets
17167 Anicom,Inc. 1.142.37 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
17168 Appleone Employment Service 5,258.70 Temporary Employment Services
17169 Applied Industrial Technology 2,115.38 Pump Supplies
17170 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 1,400.00 Lab Supplies
17171 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 520.00 Vacuum Truck Services
17172 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal
17173 OuicksettAssoc.Concrete Production 202.57 Building Materials
17174 Allas Chrysler Plymouth 22,700.77 1998 Dodge 314 Ton Service Body Truck
17175 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 351.56 Filters
17176 AMA/Keye Productivity Center 169.00 Seminar Registration
17177 Basler Electric Company, Dept.590 839.82 Electrical Supplies
17178 Battery Specialties 458.24 Batteries
17179 CorDaxSentley Systems, Inc. 8,103.69 Software-J-42
17180 Bemardo Press 178.39 Publications
17101 Boulwell B Ennor LLP 3,375.00 Legal Services-401A Plan
17162 C.S.U.F.Foundation 8,750.00 Membership
17183 C&H Distributions 236.60 Electrical Supplies
17184 Calif Centrifugal Pump 19,456.29 Pump Supplies
17185 California Automatic Gate 189.40 Service Agreement
17186 Caltrol,Inc. 588.18 Valves
17187 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 585.00 Engineering Services P1fi3
17188 Centrepointe Commercial Interior 1,981.87 Office Furniture
17189 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.314.54 Instrument Parts
17190 City of Fountain Valley 15.992.40 Water Use
17191 Communications Performance Group 18,180.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program
17192 Compressor Components Of California 10,602.60 Pump Supplies
17193 Compuserve Incorporated 54.85 Computer Services
17194 Computers America, Inc. 8,046.30 Misc.Computer Supplies
17195 Connell GM Parts 72.10 Truck Supplies
17196 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2.475.16 Electrical Supplies
17197 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 99.88 Plumbing Supplies
17198 Cooper Cameron Corporation 7,496.12 Engine Supplies
17199 Corporate Express Imaging 11,SW.70 Misc.Computer Supplies
17200 Corporate Express 1.090.17 Office Supplies
17201 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09
17202 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 241.53 Truck Parts
17203 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 165.03 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
17204 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 254.00 Underground Storage Tank Fee
Page 2 of 9 �'1 _
Claims Paid From 211199 to 2f15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17205 County of Orange 911.18 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
17206 County Wholesale Electric Co. 8,601.93 Electrical Supplies
17207 CNA Trust 21,283.20 Construction 5-41-1
17208 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 539.85 Lab Supplies
17209 CR 8 R. Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals
17210 Daniels Tire Service 419.59 Truck Tires
17211 Del Mar Analytical 2,523.00 Biosolids Analysis
17212 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 18,586.88 5 Dell Latitude Notebooks
17213 Delta Foam Products 84.74 Lab Supplies
17214 Dept.of Fish and Game 78.00 Maps
17215 Diamond H Recognition 347.92 Employee Service Awards
17216 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 255.41 Paint Supplies
17217 DISCAN Corporation 2,875.05 Computer Services
17218 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 299.00 Medical Screening
17219 Electra-Test, Inc. 5,759.00 Electrical Supplies
17220 Environmental Data Solutions Grp. 20,884.00 Professional Services-Air Duality Info. Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project
17221 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 3,185.34 Maim.Service Agreement
17222 Federal Express Corp. 37.70 Air Freight
17223 Fisher Scientific 546.72 Lab Supplies
17224 Flat and Vertical, Inc. sell Concrete Cutting
17225 Forkert Engineering 8 Surveying,Inc. 7,710.00 Engineering Services P-150
17226 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18.205.91 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
17227 Fountain Valley Camera 13.31 Photo Supplies
17228 Franklin-Miller Incorporated 18,000.00 3 Biosolids Grinder Rebuilds
17229 Frys Electronics 1,121.25 Computer Supplies
17230 City of Fullerton 95.48 Water Use
17231 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 557.61 Road Base Materials
17232 Ganahl Lumber Company 388.20 Lumber/Hardware
17233 Garraa-Callahan Company 693.37 Chemicals
17234 General Binding Corporation 412.43 Printing
17235 GTE California 1.679.56 Telephone Services
17236 Geomatrix Consultants 3,06'1.31 Legal Services
17237 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
17238 Governing 15.00 Subscription
17239 WIN Grainger Inc. 1,129.97 Compressor Supplies
17240 Graphic Distributors 1,291.92 Photographic Supplies
17241 Graseby S.T.I. 1,582.45 Engine Supplies
17242 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 287.01 Janitorial Supplies
17243 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice
17244 Harrington Industrial Plastic, Inc. 8,062.83 Plumbing Supplies
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 211/99 to 2115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17245 Hello Direct, Inc. 531.14 Telephone Headsets
17246 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 85.33 Catering Services
17247 Hewlett-Packard 1,448.00 Registration
17248 Hilbert&Associates, Inc. 17,495.00 Engineering Services P2-61
17249 HIM 3.643.52 Tools
17250 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 19.53 Compressor Parts
17251 The Holman Group 734.14 Employee Assistance Program Premium
17252 Holmes&Newer, Inc. 11,398.98 Engineering Services 2-41
17253 Home Depot 442.66 Small Hardware
17254 Hub Auto Supply 351.17 Truck Parts
17255 City of Huntington Beach 13.261.59 Water Use
17256 Idexx 569.36 Lab Supplies
17257 Image Plus Engraving 350.00 Engraving Machine Training
17256 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 11,054.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17259 Infikro Degremont, Inc. 948.53 Mechanical Parts
17260 Informatics Corporation 4,080.57 Software On-Stie Training
17261 StateNet 165.00 Online Service
17262 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 931.75 Lab Supplies
17263 Intergraph Corporation 7.948.66 Software
17264 Interstate Battery Systems 565.36 Batteries
17265 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use
17266 IBM Corporation 300.00 Service Contract
17267 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 12,131.07 Safety Supplies
17268 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,851.34 Instrument Supplies
17269 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 17,595.00 Misc.Construction Services
17270 Johnstone Supply 598.78 Electrical Supplies
17271 Jordan Controls,Inc. 335.37 Instrument Maint
17272 Kelly Paper 892.80 Paper
17273 Knox Industrial Supplies 462.27 Tools
17274 Stephen V.Kozak 225.00 Training Expense Reimb.
17275 Leadership Companies, Inc. 5,600.00 Software
17276 Lee&Ro,Inc. 18,625.32 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
17277 Lewis Publishers 84.32 Publication
17278 Lexis-Nexis 346.05 Books&Publications
17279 Lifecom-Safety, Inc. 1,200.25 Safety Supplies
17280 Lustre-Cal 825.27 Safety Supplies
17281 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,674.58 Cellular Telephone Service
17282 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 3.274.28 Engineering Services 2-37
17283 Mamco International 692.11 Janitorial Supplies
17284 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 766.28 Mechanical Supplies
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 211199 to 2/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17285 Mentek 677.09 Safety Supplies
17288 Mar Vac Electronics 35,53 Instrument Supplies
17287 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 99.94 Plumbing Supplies
17288 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 559.83 Pump Supplies
17289 Medlin Controls Co. 302,57 Instrument Supplies
17290 Robert Michna 129,29 Office Supplies Reimb.
17291 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves
17292 Mission Abrasive Supplies 5,187.90 Tools&Supplies
17293 Mission Uniform Service 4,344.48 Uniform Rentals
17294 Mitchell Instrument Co. 459.39 Instruments
17295 Monitor Labs, Inc. 3,892.17 Instrument Malnt.
17296 MotoPhoto 93.07 Photographic Services
17297 MPS Photographic Services 28.03 Photographic Services
17298 Nasce 237.83 Instrument Supplies
17299 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 695.00 Training Registration
17300 Neal Supply Co. 120.51 Plumbing Supplies
17301 Network Installation Corporation 1,093.99 Safety Equipment
17302 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,270.14 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
17303 Occupational Melon Services 1,295.39 Safety Glasses
17304 Office Depot Business Services Div. 603.70 Office Supplies
17305 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,924.67 Electrical Supplies
17306 Ortiz Fire Protection 833.00 Service Agreement
17307 Oxygen Service Company 1,264.82 Specialty Gases
17308 OCB Reprographics 738.07 Printing Service-Spec P-173
17309 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 316.52 Electrical Supplies -
17310 Pacific Bell 1,239.35 Telephone Services
17311 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services
17312 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5.434.66 Plumbing Supplies
17313 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 564.80 Tires
17314 Parts Unlimited 142.93 Truck Supplies
17315 Pizza Hut of America, Inc. 144.00 Catering Services
17316 Poly Enterprises, Inc., 641.11 Safety Supplies
17317 Polydyne,Inc. 22,557.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
17318 Port Supply 296.31 Rope
17319 Power Measurement Limited 137.08 Electrical Supplies
17320 Putzmeister 707.24 Electrical Supplies
17321 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service
17322 OAir-Calif.Div. Pump Engineering 20,544.49 Air Compressor
17323 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 108.49 Instrument Supplies
17324 R.F.MacDonald Co. 200.04 Electrical Supplies
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 2/1199 to 2/15199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17325 Radius Maps 135.00 Map
17326 Red Wing Shoes 128.44 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
17327 Reliance Electric 4,444.82 Electrical Supplies
17328 Reliastar 20,938.27 Life Insurance Premium
17329 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.172.06 Life Insurance Premium
17330 Remedy Temp 9,189.68 Temporary Employment Services
17331 Robert's Auto Tnm Shop 706.06 Auto Repair
17332 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 103.71 Video Production Service
17333 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,200.00 Engineenng Services-Design Documents
17334 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 244.21 Paint Supplies
17335 Safety-Kleen 12.640.09 Service Agreement
17336 Sagent Technology 2.195.00 Registration
17337 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 408.90 Mechanical Supplies
17338 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 469.26 Specialty Gases
17339 Second-Sun 165.18 Light Fixtures
17340 Sensorex 214.71 Electrical Supplies
17341 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 309.05 Tools
17342 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,647.89 ToolsfHardware
17343 Supelco, Inc. 1.720.15 Lab Supplies
17344 Srrinh Pipe&Supply, Inc. 79.13 Plumbing Supplies
17345 So.Cal.Gas Company 4,805.31 Natural Gas
17346 Seem Plastic Coating Co. 199.34 Electrical Supplies
17347 Sow-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Services
17348 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 250.00 Meter
17349 Spex Ceriprep, Inc. 325.57 Lab Supplies
17350 Stama Cells,Inc. 174.38 Lab Supplies
17351 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 212.92 Office Supplies
17352 Street Smart Professional Equipment 6,306.70 Photography Equipment
17353 Summit Steel 737.71 Metal
17354 Super Chem Corporation 670.80 Chemicals
17355 Superintendent of Documents 10.00 Subscription
17358 SARBS-PDC 11,000.00 Training Registration
17357 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 159.36 Publication
17358 Foxboro Company 2,184.82 Instrument Supplies
17359 The Kermit Project 525.00 Software
17360 The Pittsburgh Conference 75.00 Registration
17361 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. 1.800.00 Registration
17382 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 3,195.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
17303 Truk 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 234.71 Truck Supplies
17354 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 2,070.00 Lab Services
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 211199 to 2115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17365 Tuthill Corp 536.43 Valve
17366 Teksystems 1,760.00 Temporary Employment Services
17367 Ultra Scientific 208.00 Lab Supplies
17368 Union Dodge 23,664.06 1999 Dodge 2500 Quad Cab Truck
17369 United Parcel Service 673.64 Parcel Services
17370 University of Wisconsin Madison 2,085.00 Registration
17371 US Rental, Inc. 402.98 Dump Truck Rental
17372 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,091.94 Plumbing Supplies
17373 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,600.28 Vision Service Premium
17374 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,798.47 Door Repair
17375 VWR Scientific 8,332.10 Lab Supplies
17376 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,950.85 Security Guards
17377 Wayne Electric Co. 166.94 Electrical Supplies
17378 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 215.44 Safety Supplies
17379 West-Cite Supply Company,Inc. 17.81 Electrical Supplies
17380 Western States Chemical,Inc. 14,892.16 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
17381 Xerox Corporation(Purch) 12,365.29 Copier Leases
17382 ZD Joumals 69.00 Subscription
17383 Blake Anderson 1,149.91 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17384 James Cong 166.00 Employee Travel Advance
17385 Deirdre E.Hunter 2,088.85 Employee Computer Loan Program
17386 Robert G.Kizanis 161.96 Training Expense Reimb.
17387 Donald F.McIntyre 646.06 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17388 Michael D. Moore 581.44 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17389 Michael L.Fetterman 312.63 Training Expense Reimb.
17390 Frank G.Schultz 1,364.74 Employee Computer Loan Program
17391 Michelle Tuchman 104.25 Cellular Expense Reimb.
17392 County of Orange 1,500.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
17393 Huntington Beach,City of 60.00 Permit Fee
17394 LAPA 290.00 Registration
17395 Orange County Sanitation District 1,685.96 Petty Cash Reimb.
17396 Bio Gro Division 42,204.17 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
17397 Orange County Sanitation District 382,138.63 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
17398 Allen Press,Inc. 119.00 Printing Service
17399 Anicom, Inc. 13.79 Freight
17400 The Assoc.of Records Mgrs.&Admin. 160.00 Membership
17401 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
17402 CWEA 45.00 Membership
17403 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
17404 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 326.44 Electrical Supplies
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 2M/99 to 2/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17405 Controloo 490.31 Mechanical Supplies
17406 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
17407 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
17408 Enchanter,Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
17409 Enterprise Technology Services 1,937.50 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support
17410 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
17411 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
17412 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 1,76129 Connectors
17413 Information Strategy 207.95 Subscription
17414 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
17415 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
17416 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 429.34 Safety Supplies
17417 Lessons in Leadership 1,674.00 Registration
17418 Mar Vac Electronics 170.90 Instrument Supplies
17419 Mark B. Plummer,Esq.B Laraine Pipoly 10,042.21 Legal Services
17420 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 599.35 Tools
17421 Orange County Sanitation District 21.147.72 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
17422 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
17423 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
17424 Orange County Wholesale Electric 456.58 Electrical Supplies
17425 OCB Reprographics 3,508.77 Printing Service-Spec P-173
17426 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction
17427 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
17428 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
17429 Peace Officers Council of CA 810.00 Dues Deduction
17430 Putzmeister 378.84 Pump Supplies
17431 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 26.18 Mechanical Supplies
17432 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 531.98 Tools/Hardware
17433 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,360.64 Natural Gas
17434 Southern California Edson 10,923.45 Power
17435 Spinlex Company,Inc. 2,598.03 Janitorial Supplies
17436 State of California 104.64 Hazardous Waste Tax
17437 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,882.86 Mechanical Supplies
17438 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions
17439 UNL Center for Leadership Dev. 759.00 Registration
17440 Water Environment Research Foundation 89.50 Publication
17441 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3.135.53 Instrument Supplies
17442 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 79.93 Publications
17443 3CMA 75.00 Registration
17444 Marcus D.Dubois 553.55 Meeting Expense Reimb.
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 211199 to 2116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17445 Stephen V.Kozak 106,64 Training Expense Reimb.
17446 Wiliam S.Malik 1.631.44 Employee Computer Loan Program
17447 Patrick W. McNally 425.59 Meeting Expense Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,427,191.79
Payroll Disbursements
12891-13032 Employee Paychecks $ 179,288.62 Biweekly Payroll 2/10/99
13033-13033 Employee Paycheck 3,133.31 Termination
34645-35087 Direct Deposit Statements 616,745.06 Biweekly Payroll 2/10/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 799,167A 9
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 151,486.19 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Chase/Texas Commerce Bank 56,965.07 Quarterly LOC Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Chasefrexas Commerce Bank 206.977.80 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank&Trust 179,609.89 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 595,038.95
Total Claims Paid 211199-21IW99 $ 4,821,397.93
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 2116/99 to 2128199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
17448 Boyle Engineering Corporation $ 36,966.89 Engineering Services 6-12&7-7-1
17449 Brown and Caldwell 106.349.76 Engineering Services Pt-37&J-35-1
17450 Della Dental 37.991.36 Dental Insurance Plan
17451 Fonis Benefits Insurance Company 27,491.80 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
17452 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 53,554.80 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
17453 Margate Construction 80.061.00 Construction P1-41,P2-48&P2-53-2
17454 Pacific Investment Management Co. 115,568.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95-97
17455 Pacificare of Ca. 37,24BA7 Health Insurance Premium
17456 Painewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement
17457 Parsons Engineering Science 114,947.94 Engineering Services J42
17458 Pima Gro Systems Inc. 76.132.11 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17459 Southern California Edison 51,499.32 Power
17460 ThirdWave 89.910.50 Professional Services-Document Management Project
17461 Tole Ranch/Magan Farms 59,961.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
17462 United HeallhCare 129.274.57 Medical Health Insurance
17463 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 42,981.35 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
17464 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 4.24 Long Distance Telephone Services
17465 Abeam 88.32 Hardware
17466 ACCU STANDARD 460.47 Lab Supplies
17467 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1.260.00 Training Registration
17468 Air Liquids America Corporation 675.19 Specialty Gasses
17469 Airborne Express 103.75 Air Freight
17470 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 1,311.55 Electrical Parts&Supplies
17471 Alhambra Foundry Co Ltd 2,381.28 Manhole Frames&Covers
17472 Allied Supply Company 1.450.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17473 American Management Association 159.00 Registration
17474 American Management Association 497.00 Registration
17475 Analysts, Inc. 2,286.84 Testing Kits
17476 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 495.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
17477 Appleone Employment Service 6,912.53 Temporary Employment Services
17478 Applied Industrial Technology 454.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies
17479 Asbury Environmental Services 140.00 Waste Oil Removal
17460 Awards&Trophies By Bea 37.71 Plaques
17481 AKM Consulting Engineers 10,497.00 Consulting Services 11-20& 11.17-3
17482 ASR Analysis 900.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1
17483 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 2.015.98 Telephone Installation
17484 Battelle 4,500.00 Engineering Services Pi-51
17485 Battery Specialties 326.13 Batteries
17486 BloSource Consulting 5,995.45 Consulting Servlcce-Biosolids&Watershed
Page 1 of 8
s
Claims Paid From 2110199 to 2128199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17487 Bristol Systems, Inc. 4,380.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
17488 Bureau Of Business Practice 137.50 Publication
17489 Buy.Com 5,075.68 Computer Supplies
17490 BC Wire Rope 8 Rigging 5,662.21 Rope
17491 BICEPP 50.00 Membership-Bus.8 Industry Council for Emerg.Planning 8 Preparedness
17492 C&H Distributions 62.26 Electrical Supplies
17493 Calif Centrifugal Pump 3,701.92 Pump Supplies
17494 California Automatic Gate 463.48 Service Agreement
17495 California Journal 39.95 Publication
17496 Career Track Seminars MS2 396.00 Registration
17497 Cad Warren 8 Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator
17498 Carollo Engineers 236.38 Engineering Services J-34-1
17499 Clements Environmental 2,669.80 Consultant-Wheeler Ridge Project
17500 Compressor Components Of California 2,165.78 Pump Supplies
17501 Computers America, Inc. 4,980.83 Computer Supplies
17502 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 1.759.13 Electrical Supplies
17603 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,406.86 Engine Supplies
17504 Omray,Inc. 39.95 Subscription
17505 Corporate Express 941.97 Office Supplies
17506 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11.700.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
17507 Cost Containment Solutions 1,033.70 Worker's Comp.Services
17508 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
17509 County of Orange 665.00 Permit Fees
17510 County of Orange 628.86 Sevier Service Fees Admin.
17511 County Wholesale Electric Co. 10,358.74 Electrical Supplies
17512 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
17513 CH2MHill 20,000.00 Engineering Services-112S Scrubber Monitor Project
17614 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 1.542.92 Lab Supplies
17515 OR 8 R.Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals
17516 CWEA Annual Conference 1.995.00 Conference Registration
17517 Datavault 146.50 Ofrsite Back-Up Tape Storage
17518 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 22,764.51 6 Dell P6400 GX1 Workstations 8 5 HP LaserJet 4,000 Printers
17519 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1,3T7.68 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
17520 DMG-Maximus 8,800.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan
17521 E. Daniel Erikson 17.61 Computer Supplies
17522 Empire Scales, Inc. 160.00 Electrical Supplies
17523 Enchanter, Inc. 3.500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
17524 Enterprise Technology Services, LLC 875.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support
17525 Environmental Express 1.713.00 Lab Supplies
17528 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,777.51 Professional Services-Legislative
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From 2118/99 to 2128/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17527 Federal Express Corp. 131.05 Air Freight
17528 First American Real Estate Solutions 135.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription
17529 First Fire Systems,Inc. 8,745.67 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98
17530 Fisher Scientific 1,126.78 Lab Supplies
17531 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 410.00 Engineering Services P-150
17532 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash, Inc. 248.95 Truck Wash Tickets
17533 Franklin Covey 447.95 Office Supplies
17534 Frigid Units, Inc. 7,562.39 Lab Supplies
17535 Fry's Electronics 616.92 Computer Supplies
17636 FM International, Inc. 5,525.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System
17537 Ganahl Lumber Company 184.25 Lumber/Hardware
17638 Garratt-Callahan Company 4,494.26 Chemicals
17539 GTE California 3,035A9 Telephone Services
17540 Genium Publishing Corp. 286.00 Publication
17541 George Yardley Co. 620.71 Lab Supplies
17542 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,209.53 Pump Supplies
17543 WIN Grainger, Inc. 1,390.89 Compressor Supplies
17544 Graseby STI 5,168.53 Engine Supplies
17545 Great American Printing Co. 302.76 Printing Service
17546 GE Multilin, Inc.(Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair
17547 Hach Company 253.07 Lab Supplies
17548 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,603.09 Plumbing Supplies
17649 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 293.67 Truck Supplies
17550 Voided Check - -
17551 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 48.29 Catering Services
17552 Hilton, Famkopf&Hobson, LLC 20,680.16 Consulting Services-Office Support Study
17563 Home Depot 188.75 Small Hardware
17554 Hunt's Final Phase 447.38 Construction-Admin. Bldg. Kitchen Floor Rehab
17565 Idexx 5,277.78 Lab Supplies
17556 Imaging Plus, Inc. 863.79 Office Supplies
17557 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 8.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17568 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 461.87 Lab Supplies
17559 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.30 Water Use
17580 IBM Corporation 6,375.37 Service Contract
17561 Airgas Direct Industrial-IPCO Safety Div. 467.99 Safety Supplies
17562 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,620.58 Instrument Supplies
17563 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 300.00 Training Expenses
17664 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 9.925.07 Misc.Construction Services
17565 Jensen Instrument Co. 571.24 Instrument Supplies
17566 Jobs Available,Inc. 147.20 Notices&Ads
Page 3 of 8
er
Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2/28199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17557 Johnstone Supply 347.16 Electrical Supplies
17568 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,641.21 Medical Insurance Premium
17569 Kathco 246.22 Janitorial Supplies
17570 Kelly Paper 19.72 Paper
17571 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,536.10 Tools
17572 Lee&Ro,Inc. 1,407.80 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
17573 Uns-X Protective Coatings 871.82 Truck Supplies
17574 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 1,341.05 Engineering Services J-53
17575 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,519.21 Mechanical Supplies
17578 McKenna Engineering&Equipment Co., Inc. 6,76C80 Pump Supplies
17577 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 283.11 Tools
17578 Mc Welce Rack-N-Box Company 1.192.36 Auto Parts&Supplies
17579 Microsoft Corporation 1,990.00 Software
17680 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,135.95 Mechanical Repairs
17581 Mission Uniform Service 2,978.10 Uniform Rentals
17582 The Monster Board 175.00 Job Posting on the Internet
17583 Mellon Industries 331.83 Pump Supplies
17584 MotoPhoto 11.67 Photographic Services
17585 MPS Photographic Services 11.86 Photographic Services
17586 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
17587 National Plant Services,Inc. 1.690.00 Vacuum Truck Services
17588 Neal Supply Co. 2,336.63 Plumbing Supplies
17589 Network Associates 4,100.00 Computer Consulting Services
17590 New Hermes,Inc. 121.33 Tools
17591 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 6.900.74 LubricanUDiesel Fuel
17592 Ninyo&Moore 2.079.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
17593 The Norco Companies 119.15 Mail Delivery Service
17594 NROC 10.00 Publication
17595 O.C. Business Journal 74.00 Subscription
17596 Occupational Vision Services 645.48 Safety Glasses
17597 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,652.13 Office Supplies
17598 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 71.25 Plumbing Supplies
17599 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 7,242.96 Electrical Supplies
17600 Orange Courier 51.30 Courier Services
17601 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 316.54 Fittings
17602 Oxygen Service Company 518.74 Specialty Gases
17603 OCB Reprographics 170.87 Printing Service-Spec P-173
17604 OI Analytical 547.75 Lab Supplies
17605 Pacific Bell 17.43 Telephone Services
17606 Pacific Mechanical Supply 468.00 Plumbing Supplies
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 2116199 to 2120199
Warrant No. vendor Amount Description
17607 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 15,721.10 Software
17608 Parts Unlimited 418.19 Truck Supplies
17609 Pitney Bowes 352.35 Postage Machine Service Agreement
17610 Platinum Technology, Inc. 1,251.00 Software
17611 Polydyne,Inc. 23,386,06 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
17612 Port Supply 35.68 Rope
17613 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
17614 Quality Building Supply 199.77 Building Supplies
17615 R.F. MacDonald Co. 199.98 Electrical Supplies
17616 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,324.22 Trash Removal
17617 Red Wing Shoes 118.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
17618 Regents of the University of Calif. 225.00 Registration
17619 Reliastar 7,984.00 Life Insurance Premium
17620 Remedy Temp 2.300.48 Temporary Employment Services
17621 RBF Engineers 7,100.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1
17622 RPM Electric Motors 2.610.59 Electric Motor Repair
17623 RS Hughes Cc Inc 47.51 Paint Supplies
17624 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 65.34 Mechanical Supplies
17625 Schwing America, Inc. 3,051.94 Pump Supplies
17626 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,301.35 Specialty Gases
17627 Sears Industrial Sales 269.19 Mechanical Supplies
17628 Second-Sun 85.16 Light Fixtures
17629 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 6,770.94 Tools/Hardware
17630 So.Cal.Gas Company 12,165.21 Natural Gas
17631 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 11,068.47 Emission Fees
17632 Sprint 34.50 Long Distance Telephone Service
17633 State Board of Equalization 983.00 Hazardous Waste Fee
17634 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
17635 Strategic Research Institute 1,395.00 Registration
17636 Street Smart Professional Equipment 263.45 Safety Equipment
17637 Summit Steel 106.24 Metal
17638 Swains Electric Motor Service 710.85 Pump
17639 SCAP 24,000.00 Membership-So.Calif.Alliance of POTW
17640 SMC Networks 1,584.75 Computer Supplies
17641 Tasew, Inc. 1.820.47 Valves
17642 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 890.23 Electric Cart Parts
17643 Telebyte Technology,Inc. 1,508.97 Security System Equipment
17644 Teledyne Analytical 164.45 Instrument Parts
17645 Foxboro Company 1,207.37 Instrument Supplies
17646 The Register 837.90 Notices 8 Ads
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 2N6W to 2128199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17647 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4.622.96 Mechanical Supplies
17648 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 72.78 Locks 8 Keys
17649 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 4.900.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
17650 TDWI Fourth Annual Implementation Conf. 1.475.00 Registration
17651 Teksystems 2.640.00 Temporary Employment Services
17652 The Unisource Corporation 376.73 Office Supplies
17653 United Parcel Service 33.97 Parcel Services
17654 Valmm 6,065.46 Software-Microsoft Project 98
17655 Valley Cities Supply Company 928.20 Plumbing Supplies
17656 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 536.00 Instrument Maint.Service
17657 Veme's Plumbing 140.00 Plumbing Supplies
17658 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,600.28 Vision Service Premium
17659 VWR Scientific 8,147.47 Lab Supplies
17660 The Wackenhut Corporation 9.036.40 Security Guards
17661 Wayne Electric Co. 1,086.12 Electrical Supplies
17662 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 22.00 Electrical Supplies
17663 Western Business Systems 368.65 Office Supplies
17664 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 3,135.53 Instrument Supplies
17665 Xerox Corporation 5,788.97 Copier Leases
17666 Xpedex Paper 8 Graphics 108.61 Office Supplies
17667 20th Century Plastics,Inc. 91.16 Office Supplies
17668 Blake Anderson 644.17 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17669 Layne T.Baroldi 735.74 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17670 Mark Castillo 170.00 Meeting Expense
17671 Terri L.Josway 219.89 Training Expense Reimb.
17672 Michael D.Moore 787.04 .Meeting Expense Reimb.
17673 Edward M.Tones 413.58 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17674 Orange County Sanitation District 1.547.89 Petty Cash Reimb.
17675 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 17,241.46 Emission Fees
17676 Helga Hass 8 Micro Center 2,882.77 Employee Computer Loan Program
17677 Orange County Sanitation District 392,889.50 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
17678 Orange County Water District 146,535.88 Consulting Services J-36
17679 Andy's Salvage Pick Up 1.800.00 Construction Services-Material Removal
17680 Amcor Vac Sweeping Service 1.092.00 Vacuum Truck Services
17681 Eames 8 Noble Books 211.71 Publication
17682 BearCom 14,107.50 Communication Equipment
17683 Bentley Systems,Inc. 493.85 Software Maint.
17684 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
17685 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
17686 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 231.31 Electrical Supplies
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2/28199
Warrant No. Vander Amount Description
17687 Converse Consultants 5,076.62 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
17688 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
17689 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
17690 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
17691 Franklin Covey 103.65 Office Supplies
17692 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
17693 GTE California 5.060.14 Telephone Services
17894 Geri Lopker&Associates 3,144.11 Engineering Services-Customer Relations
17695 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 104.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17696 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
17697 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,803.06 Dues Deduction
17698 Irvine Ranch Water District 20.08 Water Use
17699 law,Inc. 498.71 Lab Supplies
17700 Maintenance Technology Corp. 163.06 Welding Supplies
17701 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1.616.94 Tools
17702 Motion Industries 167.00 Pump Supplies
17703 Mouse Graphics 775.26 Printing Services
17704 Jolyn Murphy 527.50 SA River Watershed Meeting
17705 Office Depot Business Services Div. 91.87 Office Supplies
17706 Orange County Family Support 1,186.78 Wage Garnishment
17707 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
17708 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 911.94 Electrical Supplies
17709 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 350.84 Fittings
17710 OCEA 624.32 Dues Deduction
17711 Pacific Bell 1,192.04 Telephone Services
17712 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
17713 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
17714 Peace Officers Council of CA 819.00 Dues Deduction
17715 Pinkerton Systems Integration 262.60 Door Repair
17716 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 2,792.00 Engineering Services-Design Documents
17717 RS Hughes Co Inc 165.92 Paint Supplies
17718 City of Seal Beach 174.94 Water Use
17719 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 28.53 Tools
17720 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2.198.95 Tools/Hardware
17721 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
17722 So.Cal.Gas Company 59.45 Natural Gas
17723 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment
17724 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 750.00 COP Trustee Services
17725 Textile Engineering Associates 1,083.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
17726 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 165.04 Mechanical Supplies
Page 7 of 8 <
Claims Paid From 2/16199 to 2128199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on
17727 United Way 307.63 Employee Contributions
17728 University of Wisconsin Madison 795.00 Training Registration
17729 UNL Center for Leadership Development 79.00 Training Registration
17730 Western States Chemical, Inc. 20,805.02 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
17731 Nicholas J.Arhontes 435.76 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17732 Jeffrey Brown 499.98 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17733 Michael D.Moore 202.91 Meeting Expense Reimb.
17734 Michael D.White 250.00 Meeting Expense
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,303,110.15
Payroll Disbursements
13034-13056 Directors'Paychecks $ 6,019.49 Payroll 2118/99
13057-13197 Employee Paychecks 186,010.22 Biweekly Payroll 2/24199
13198.13199 Directors'Paychecks 222.23 Payroll 2/18/99 Mlssing Time Sheets
3608635532 Direct Deposit Statements 635,653.29 Biweekly Payroll 2110/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 827,906.23
Wlra Transfer Payments
None
Total Claims Paid 2116/99-PJ28199 It 3,131,021.38
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meet gDate TO6O3/24/990r .Dir.
AGENDA REPORT Item Number ItemN mber
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF HEARING AND PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM CLAIM
REQUIREMENT RE MICHAEL ROZENGURT V. ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief from Claim Requirement filed
on behalf of former employee Michael Rozengurt (Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 806118), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District.
SUMMARY
On October 9, 1998, Mr. Rozengurt fled a claim with the District alleging wrongful
termination. This claim was returned by the District as being insufficient. An "amended"
claim was thereafter returned as being untimely. On January 27, 1999, the Board
denied Mr. Rozengurt's Application for Permission to Present a Late Claim. The subject
Notice of Hearing and Petition for Relief was served on the District on March 2, 1999.
The purpose is to petition the Court for an order of relief from filing a timely claim. If the
Court grants the relief order, a suit shall be filed within 30 days.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
ATTACHMENTS
Memo from General Counsel dated March 4, 1999.
GGS:SK:BG
c trertrnrt am.w owew.mc
NrvrE: bJ690
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, February 24, 1999
An adjourned meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation
District was held on Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT:
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Directors Absent: Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager
Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Bob Doter, Director of Operations and
Maintenance
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the of the January 27, 1999 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
i
Minutes of the Steering Committee °
Page 2
February 24, 1999
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there is a water tour planned by the Water Education
Foundation that might be of interest to the directors. He will announce this tour at the Board meeting
tonight.
Mr. McIntyre also reported that we have received preliminary notice that we may be fined something
as a result of the spill on PCH. The RWOCB staff felt that the District did have some liability. Bob
Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, added that the staff report on the spill will recommend that the
three parties share any fine that may be imposed. Mr. Ghirelli indicated that District procedures have
been revised and staff is working with Underground Service Alert staff to get legislative amendments
on their procedures as well. The Directors will be advised when the final determination by the
Regional Board is received. Mr. McIntyre indicated that the District staff did not disagree with the
regulators.
Blake Anderson updated the Committee members on activities relating to the Park Place
development. IRWD staff has continued to meet with District staff to resolve some of the 15 issues
relating to the exchange of facilities. A white paper will be prepared and presented to the Steering
Committee at its March meeting that will discuss the pros and cons of the issues relating to the
proposed exchange. Trammel Crow has agreed to 'one last extension' of the tolling agreement,
through March 9. In order for staff to complete the work with IRWD, they will need at least 90 days
and preferably 120 days. A preliminary timeline has been developed.
Director Swan announced that he has voluntarily removed himself from this issue, and Director Shea
is no longer taking part in negotiations either.
The Committee directed staff to request a 120-day extension to the tolling agreement to make an
orderly assessment of the issues, prepare a white paper and put together the three agreements that
are contemplated for the transfer of Park Place from Area 7 to Area 14, including the financial
impacts. If agreement cannot be reached with Trammel Crow, then a lawsuit may result.
Mr. Anderson updated the Committee members on the Kern County biosolids issues. Mr. Ghirelli and
Mike Moore reported on the most recent Board of Supervisors meeting, at which District staff made
an excellent presentation. The meeting was videotaped and it will be made available for future
meetings. A final vote by the Kern County Supervisors on land application of Class B biosolids is
expected within the next 3.6 months.
Mr. McIntyre indicated that staff is continuing to look for sites for a possible composting operation,
and may consider joint ownership with other agencies.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report. He did, however, indicate that he had just received the
response from the arbitrator on the SPMT negotiations, but has not had a chance to review it.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
February 24, 1999
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-E)
A. Five-year Retrospective. Michelle Tuohman discussed the preparation of this document
to address the changes that have occurred in the past five years, as well as discussing
where the agency is at present and what direction it is headed. This is mostly technical
information that is prepared by O&M for the annual report but would be written in
layman's terms. It would also include additional background information to help the
Directors with decision making on future issues. The Committee members decided that
at this time this document was not necessary. The information staff is presenting to the
Directors is sufficient. Rather than an overview, specific audiences should be
considered first.
B. Y2K Action Plan Update. Patrick Miles indicated that work is proceeding and,with the
exception of embedded items, things are going smoothly. The objectives of the Action
Plan were reviewed. Al this time it doesn't appear that the budget will be exceeded. A
contingency plan is being developed and will be presented to the Directors in April. It
was noted that staff will be on site on December 31, 1999 and will monitor world-wide
events in an effort to head off any problems that others may experience. The
assessment has turned up a non-compliance problem with the control system for the
central power generation engines. The manufacturer is correcting this.
C. Servino Areas outside OCSD Sphere of Influence. Don McIntyre stated that we
continue to receive sewer service requests from developers of property outside the
boundaries of the District. in some cases, the local sewering agencies oppose our
providing this service, for reasons other than environmental and public health. The
existing policy allows exceptions with Board concurrence. Staff will prepare a white
paper on the various issues and report back to the Steering Committee.
D. FY 98-99 Objectives for General Managers Performance Evaluation. The Committee
reviewed the objectives and asked that revisions be made. Objective No. 6 is to be
removed. Staff will revise the document and return it to the Committee for approval at
the next meeting.
E. Review Aoenda Items Scheduled to be presented to Committees in March. The Agenda
Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were
reviewed. Director Collins asked that the issue of consolidated user fees be considered
by the FAHR Committee. After some discussion the General Manager indicated that this
study would be included in the Finance Department's work plan for 99-00.
Director Swan submitted a list of suggested discussion items for the retreat and staff will
be assigning these issues to the various working committees for additional discussion
and possible consideration as time permits-
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY
Proposed Organizational Restructuring. This discussion was continued from the adjourned
February 22 retreat. The Steering Committee reviewed six options, which were only a sampling of the
possibilities. The two areas that are being considered are 1)what the structure of the organization is
going to look like, and 2) identify the work groups within the agency from the standpoint of
W
Minutes of the Steering Committee `
Page 4
February 24, 1999
manageability. A decision will be required on whether to run the agency'lean and mean' or have one
or two assistant general managers. It as stated that the General Manager should make the final
decision on how the organization should be structured according to his/her management style, and
that person has not yet been decided. Don McIntyre said that this issue would impact the budget
assumptions and development. It was decided that this subject needed additional discussion at the
next Steering Committee meeting, March 24, and to give it adequate time, the meeting will begin at
4:30 p.m.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 24, 1999 at 4:30 p.m., one-half hour
earlier than usual. It is scheduled to be a combined meeting with the Strategic Plan Ad Hoc
Committee.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
A Closed Session was agendized, however, because the discussion item was also on the Board
agenda, the Committee chose to defer discussion.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
Submitted by: // J
J a Tappan
t ring Committee Secretary
e.�.ee.�evsreEruus cauurnrnocvenmoaacc sc wm,rt...e:
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE/EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
COMMITTEE RETREAT
Saturday, February 20, 1999
A meeting of the Steering Committee and the Executive Management Team of the
Orange County Sanitation District was held on Saturday, February 20, 1999 at 9 a.m.,
in the District's Administrative Office.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Jan Debay called the retreat to order at 9:06 a.m. and welcomed the Steering Committee and
Executive Management Team members to the meeting. Those present were:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Peer Swan, Vice Chair
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT:
Tom Saltarelf, Chairman, FAHR Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Directors Absent: Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager
Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and
Maintenance
Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Don McIntyre reviewed the purpose and the intent of the retreat—to discuss and determine policy
pertaining to organizational issues and the future direction of the agency.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel indicated that all members of the Executive Management Team have also been
designated as members of the Negotiation Team, as follows
Minutes of the Steering Committee W
Page 2
February 20, 1999
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance.
Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
CLOSED SESSION
The Negotiating Committee then adjourned into closed session at 9:08 a.m., pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss proposed changes to the compensation program
for 501- and OCEA- represented employees. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the
Board Secretary. The minutes of the Board of Directors will report on the actions when they are
approved.
At 10:30 a.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Don McIntyre announced that negotiations with 501 and OCFA will be headed by Dan Cassidy, an
outside consultant.
Organizational Issues:
Succession Plan for 2000. Mr. McIntyre indicated a need for succession planning because of the
department of Mike Pelerman, Director of Human Resources, on January 1, 2000 and himself in May
2000. With budget development underway, this may be the time to consider reorganizing the agency.
It was Mr. McIntyre's recommendation that the Steering Committee consider appointing Blake
Anderson the future next general manager well before his contract expires May 12, 2000. The six
months of recruiting that would be necessary if going outside the agency would create additional
anxiety for employees.
Organizational Structure. Blake Anderson described a proposed change in the organization that
would reduce the number of departments to 5 and eliminate the AGM position. The change would be
included in the 1999-2000 budget, though probably not implemented at that time. While the divisions
would remain essentially the same in numbers, the reporting structure would change. The goal is to
streamline and Flatten the executive management structure.
After much discussion, the Steering Committee agreed to adjourn the discussion to 4:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, February 24, prior to the regular Steering Committee meeting. Staff was directed to
provide 4-5 options for consideration by the Committee.
~ Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
February 20, 1999
Staffina Plan:
Impact of CIP on Engineering and other Departments. David Ludwin explained the need for additional
staffing in the Engineering Department because of the increase in Capital Improvement Projects
scheduled for the next 4-5 years. Some of the requested positions will be contract employees rather
than full-lime District employees. This will allow hiring staff that have specific skill sets for the
duration those skills are required. Staff will prepare a narrative explanation as well as the charts and
present them to the PDC Committee. Necessary job skills will be identified to complete the CIP, as
well as identifying skills of existing employees.
Revisit Taroet Numbers. Staff has determined that to go below 500 would require automation of the
plants and at this time that is at least three years away. Job J-42, currently underway, will identify
what operations are cost effective to automate.
Willingness to Increase Operational Risk to Achieve Staffina Reductions. Risks associated with
automation must also be considered and managed. A model will be presented to the Directors when
this project is complete. Because this information is not available at this time, staff is recommending
that the current staffing projections remain in place.
Willingness to Utilize Layoffs to Achieve Staffina Reductions. This issue was not discussed
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Blake Anderson announced that there will be a workshop on March 13 to discuss ocean issues re the
Groundwater Replenishment System EIR so that the Directors will have background information
before considering the adoption of the final EIR at the March 24 Joint Boards meeting.
On Saturday, April 10, another workshop will be held at the request of the FAHR Committee to review
the connection fee rate schedule. All directors will be encouraged to attend this workshop.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 12:15 p.m.
Submitted by: /
lt_ 0--1c
J Tappan
ering Committee Secretary
w 1p GNNpe, &WEER CQ MIREflYVfeD0V0]NYO SCEMIRelwl Minulel Gx
' be
s b
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, March 3, 1999 - 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on March 3, 1999, in the District's Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Others Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair
James Ferryman, Vice Chair Staff Present:
Peer Swan, Vice Chair
Jan Debay, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Don Bankhead Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services
John Collins, Past Board Chair Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin.
Anna Piercy Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance
Peter Green Dave Ludwin, Director Engineering
Joy Neugebauer Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology
Charles E. Sylvia Michelle Tuchman, Director Communications
Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Directors Absent: Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Jeff Armstrong, Principal Environmental Specialists
Jon Thomsic, Sr. Engineer
Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialists
Jim Wybenga, Principal Environmental Specialists
Jerry Jones, Maintenance Manager
Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manger
Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manage
Barbara Collins, Sr. Financial Analyst
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
OCSD 0 P.o.Box 0127 0 Foundin vanes,CA 9272"127 0 (714)962-2411
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee r
Page 2
March 3, 1999
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the December 2, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (Pat McGuigan)
Chair McGuigan introduced both Joy Neugebauer and Peter Green as new members to the
Committee. Chair McGuigan also announced that, if there were no objections, beginning with
the April 7, 1999 Committee meeting, the Committee's start time would change to start at 5:00
p.m. instead of 5:30 p.m. There was no objection.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre)
The General Manager reported that he had just returned from a wastewater industry meeting in
San Antonio, TX and was impressed with the major increasing competitiveness that has taken
place partly due to operating efficiently and the fear of privatization. This is a major contrast to
where it was just three years ago.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson)
The Assistant General Manager was not in attendance.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges)
Informed the Committee that an advertising agency would be doing a Saturn photo-shoot at the
Plant 2 facility on March 4, 1999. He also showed a 10 minute video entitled "Grease is the
Word", obtained from the City of Oxnard's Wastewater Treatment Facility.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles)
Update on item OMTS98-030 Year 2000 Date Change Compliance Project: Project is coming
along well. There are four major areas that still require further work. Software testing has been
identified and Information technology or) is working with Engineering and O&M to review the
approach being used to assess embedded devices. In April IT will be coming forward a
contingency plan proposal. Cost to-date is approximately$1M, which breaks down to 1/3 in
overhead, 1/3 staff time and 1/3 in contract billing. The GM, Communications, Finance, GSA
and IT departments are either complete or near completion. Objective One of the Project will be
met in April/May 1999 timeframe. Can Gen control systems at Plants 1 and 2 are in the process
of having the control systems updated. CMMS is not Y21K compliant and IT is replacing it with
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
March 3, 1999
PEMS. This system should be in place by the end of the year. Source Control inspectors
continue to discuss Y2K with their permittees as they complete their inspections and are in the
process of scheduling a Multi-agency Outreach Y21K Forum on April 8, 1999.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten)
Due to the lack of rain this year, the flow received at the treatment plant is below budget, which
will reduce operation costs if rain stays at the present low levels. This is in contract with very
high monthly average flows for this time last due to El Nino. Attached to this month's Monthly
O&M Report is the Quarterly DART Update. Directors are concerned about the number and
type of accidents reported this month and if the employees are using the appropriate safety
devices in their daily activities and request that our Safety Prevention procedures be reviewed
with the employees. Staff reported that due to the Y2K project, preventative maintenance has
been impacted.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelll)
The Regional Water Quality Board will be meeting Friday, March 5, 1999 to discuss the spill in
Newport Beach on July 21, 1998 where thousands of gallons of raw sewage spilled. Staff will
be seeking guidance from the Board on how to proceed. There are multiple agencies that share
responsibility for that spill including OCSD. There is the possibility that a penalty will be
assessed in the amount of$15 to $25 thousand dollars.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
DISCUSSION ITEMS)
The order of Discussion Item(s) was changed to place Item OMTS99-06 first.
1. OMTS99-06 PLANT REINVENTION AND AUTOMATION PROJECT STATUS
REPORT, JOB NO. J-42
Motion:
Information only
2. OMTS99-01 COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM UPDATE
Motion:
Information only
Minutes of the Operations. Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
March 3, 1999
3. OMTS99-02 ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE UPDATE
Motion:
Information only
4. OMTS99-03 IN-SOURCING OF DISTRICTS OCEAN MONITORING
PROGRAM
Motion:
Information only
5. OMTS99-04 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
Motion:
Information only
6. OMTS99-05 MULTI-AGENCY BENCHMARKING STUDY
Motion:
Information only
6. OMTS99-06 PLANT REINVENTION AND AUTOMATION PROJECT STATUS
REPORT, JOB NO. J-42
Motion:
Information only
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
1
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
k, and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
March 3, 1999
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
April 7, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Submitted by:
r ,
ankie Woodside
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
M:4vp.dtata9enda%OMTS\7999WIinutesU3-99 Wnutes.doe
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, March 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., in the
District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present.
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Norm Eckenrode, Chair John Linder, Construction Manager
Steve Anderson Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
John Collins, Past Chair Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor
Lynn Daucher Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer
Jack Mauller Penny Kyle, Board Secretary
Russell Patterson Gail Cain, Executive Assistant
Christina Shea
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair
Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Board Chair None
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
OCSD • P 0.Box 8127 • Fountain Vail".CA 92728A127 . (714) 962-2411
a
e
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting `
Page 2
March 4, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the February 4, 1999 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager was not present.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering advised that an orientation for new Directors to the PDC Committee
would be held on April 1, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. prior to the regularly scheduled meeting.
Mr. Ludwin then requested the committee's input on future requests for budget increases for staff
costs. The committee directed staff to continue bringing these requests to the committee and full
board for approval.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item, The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report and
the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%).
(11) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item a)
a. POC99-07. Receive and file verbal report on Plant Reinvention and Automation
Project, Job No. J-42. (Information Only Item)
Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer, reported on Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention
and Automation Project.
r
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 3
March 4, 1999
(12) ACTION ITEMS (Hems No. b-h)
b. PDC99-08: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc.
authorizing an addition of$60,150, increasing the total contract amount
to $35,689,903; and (2) Accept Job No. Pt-36-2 as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
c. PDC99-09: Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job
No. Pt-40-3, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with Pave West.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
d. PDC99-10: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,
Job No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc, authorizing an addition
of$25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to
$989,809; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement with AirPol Construction, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
e. PDC99-11: Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional
funds for Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job
No. J-31-3, for a total project budget of$1,811,000,
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval.
f. PDC99-12: Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval.
g. PDC99.13: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, with Veme's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an
addition of$250, increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and
(2)Accept Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract
No. 5.33-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Veme's
Plumbing, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval. Director Jack Mauller abstained.
9
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting `
Page 4
March 4, 1999
h. PDC99-14: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Improvements to Main Street Pump
Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an
addition of$262,274, and 203 calendar days, increasing the total
contract amount to$2,656,974; and (2) Approve a budget amendment of
$351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a total project budget of
$4,232,000.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
Director Russell Patterson abstained.
(14) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session_
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
(18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
April 1, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. Beginning with the May 6, 1999 meeting, the starting time will change to
5:00 p.m.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair dedared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Submitted by:
ail Cain
PDC Committee Secretary
H:Wp.E WgW0CNDCNIMARVA.W..d
PDC COMMITTEE Meeaog Date ro .0
r wr.
3/4/99 3/24/99
AGENDA REPORT IemNumOer ItemN
q -08
Orange County Sanitation Dlst '
FROM: David Ludwin, irector of Engineering
Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide
SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-36-2
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 17 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$60,150,
increasing the total contract amount to $35,689,903; and (2)Accept Job No. P1-36-2,
as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 17 includes fifteen items of added and deleted work to Job
No. P1-36-2. There is one error item associated with this change order. There is no
time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract
are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been
completed.
Contract Start Date Oct. 18, 1995
Original Contract Completion Date Mar. 5, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 17
Current Contract Completion Date Nov. 16, 1998
Actual Completion Date Nov. 16, 1998
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes 338,753.00
This Change (Add) 60,150.00
Change Orders to Date 398,903.00
Percentage Increase 1.13%
Amended Contract Price $35,689,903.00
Value Engineering Credits $ 334,841.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: A.3.b)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of
expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten
new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the return activated sludge (RAS) pumps,
replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation
of three existing dissolved air Flotation thickeners (DAF), addition of three new dissolved
air flotation thickeners (DAF) and other improvements. These improvements will
increase the secondary treatment capacity from 46 million gallons per day to 80 million
gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County
Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo Engineers prepared the
plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate on June 28, 1995.
This contract is now complete. The following summarizes the change order.
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Provide Screw Type Compressors $ ( 5,647) 0 Design Change
—VE#9
2 Delete Seismic Braces for Pipe ( 3,000) 0 Design Change
Support Racks
3 Add Electrical Pullbox at Secondary 432 0 Changed
Clarifiers Condition
4 Add Light Fixtures in Tunnel 6,646 0 Design Change
5 Replace Blower Discharge Valve 25,713 0 Design Change
Seats
6 Purchase of Excavated Material 5 000 0 Other
7 Wash Down Aeration Diffusers 15,446 0 Other
8 Revise Fixture Mounting Details 404 0 Error
9 Relocate Electrical Feed for 2,075 0 Design Change
Polymer Mixer
10 Modify Piping in Polymer Area 467 0 Design Change
11 1 Remove Temporary Bypass Piping 3.454 0 Design Change
12 Piping Modifications in DAF 4,932 0 Desi n Change
13 Reimbursement for Truck Loading ( 2,317) 0 Other
Facility Repair
14 Add Floor Drain Polymer Area 5,783 0 Design Change
15 Modify HVAC Duct in DAF 762 0 Design Change
TOTAL - Change Order No. 17 1 $ 60,150 0
1WobaftWalal WtglobaMgenda pall Rap*ft%PDCW1362AIR-0017-MAR.dw
Page 2
All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if
discovered or known in the design phase. There is no rework or consultant
reimbursement associated with Item B.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
PRIC
\WobaftWatal NtglobalWgenda Draft RepaftXPDC1P1362AIR-0017-MAR.da
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Secondary Treatment Imp. At Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-36-2
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE DATE(%)
Project Development S
Design Staff E
Consuaant PSA is 1,406,055 6 1,469,058 S 1,469,058 $ 1,469,ma E 1.469.058 S 1.302,300 89%
Construction Contract S 35.835.690 B 36,035,690 $ 36.035.690 $ 35.829.753 S WJ50 S 35,689,903 $ 35,629,753 100%
Construction(Other) E
Construction Stall 9 3,358,245 S 3,295,252 $ 3,295.252 $ 3,295.252 $ 3.295,252 E 2,320.032 70%
Contingency $TOTAL E 40.600,000 $ 40,800,000 S $ 40,8OO,ODO S 40,394,063 B 60.150 $ 40,454,213 E 39,252,085 97%
n7%we.dlAan9ljaE..dR I.36-2laoneodaal9l.A.
1—R.—d 1/19199
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1
Job No. P7-36-2
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 6128/95 $ 35,291000.00 $ 35,291,000.00 0.00 900 900
CO NO. 1 11/22/95 $ (297.500.00) $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900
"CO NO. 2 6/6196 $ - $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900
CO NO. 3 8128/96 $ (100,226.00) $ 34,893,274.00 (1.13) 0 900
CO NO. 4 9125/96 $ 24,733.00 $ 34,918,007.00 (1.06) 0 900
"CO NO. 5 10/3196 $ 29,251.00 $ 34,947,258.00 (0.97) 0 900
CO NO. 6 3126/97 $ 179,966.00 $ 35,127,224.00 (0.46) 0 900
CO NO. 7 4/23/97 $ 130,573.00 $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 28 928
'CO NO. 8 4/24197 $ - $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 98 1026
"CO NO. 9 8/7/97 $ (2,479.00) $ 35,255,318.00 (0.10) 0 1026
*CO NO. 10 10/16/97 $ 6,966.00 $ 35,262,284.00 (0.08) 0 1026
CO NO. 11 12/17/97 $ 69,628.00 $ 35,331,912.00 0.12 0 1026
*CO NO. 12 4/8198 $ 22,651.00 $ 35,354,563.00 0.18 0 1026
*CO NO. 13 6124/98 $ (8,272.00) $ 35,346,291.00 0.16 17 1043
"CO NO. 14 9/3198 $ 30.154.00 $ 35,376,445.00 0.24 15 1058
CO NO. 15 10/28/98 $ 122,912.00 $ 35,499,357.00 0.59 38 1096
CO NO. 16 12/16/98 $ 130,396.00 $ 35,629,753.00 0.96 60 1158
CO NO. 17 Pending $ 60,150.00 1 $ 35,689,903.00 1.13 0 1156
'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
—Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
P1362CO Stet Rpt
Page 1 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"Il27
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Dale: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduet) $60,150.00
In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 — PROVIDE SCREW TYPE COMPRESSORS AT DAF FACILITY—
VALUE ENGINEERING PROPOSAL NO, 9
This credit item provides for air-cooled screw-type compressors in lieu of the specified water-
cooled reciprocating compressors at the DAF facility. This item includes miscellaneous revisions
to piping, wiring, and control to accommodate the new compressors. The decision to acquire the
new compressors was due to many factors: compressor cost, longevity, reduced water use,
reduced maintenance, and elimination of corrosion that would occur by using a water-cooled
compressor. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-35, VE P1362.09)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (5,647.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2— DELETE SEISMIC BRACES FOR PIPE SUPPORT RACKS
This credit item is for deleting 50 seismic braces for pipe rack supports on this project. These
braces are being deleted from this project and improved braces for the piping will be installed as
part of the seismic retrofit project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-58)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (3,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2
ITEM 3—ADD ELECTRICAL PULLBOX AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS
This item is for providing labor and material to add a concrete electrical pullbox near the
Secondary Clarifiers adjacent to Power Building 6. The existing pullbox was destroyed during the
demolition work for the new Secondary Clarifiers. This work was not included in the original
contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-86)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 432.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4—ADD LIGHT FIXTURES IN EXISTING CLARIFIER TUNNEL
This item is for providing labor and material to install 11 new light fixtures in the existing
Secondary Clarifier Tunnel. The new fixtures are necessary to provide adequate lighting for
District personnel to perform maintenance work on the new equipment installed in this tunnel.
This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-102)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,646.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5— REPLACE BLOWER DISCHARGE VALVE SEATS
This item is for labor and material to replace valve seats for the blower discharge valves at
Blowers 1, 2, 4, and 5. The existing valve seats are 20 years old and are no longer functioning
adequately. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-107)
ADDED COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 25,713.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2
ITEM 6—PURCHASE OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
This item is for retaining approximately 5,000 cubic yards of select surplus excavated material
that originally was specified for removal from the site. This material is needed for use as
structural fill material for the future warehouse project at Plant No. 2. The costs associated with
this item result from the Contractor's revenue loss resulting from this change. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions
(Reference: FCO P1362-123)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 7—WASH DOWN AERATION DIFFUSERS AND PUMP OUT CLARIFIERS
This item provides labor and equipment to wash down the aeration diffusers and pump out the
Secondary Clarifiers in order to support the construction sequence. This wash down work was
not shown in the original contract documents and District staff was unable to perform this work in
the necessary fime frame. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-130)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,446 00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8—REVISE FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL AT RAS PUMP STATION
This item revises the light fixture mounting detail in order to hang the fixtures from the ceiling.
This revision was necessary due to a conflict in the contract documents that indicated a wall-
mount type facture. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-132)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 404.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 6
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2
ITEM 9— RELOCATE ELECTRICAL FEED FOR POLYMER MIXER
This item provides labor and material to relocate the electrical feed for Polymer Mix Tank No. 2
from MCC W'to the new MCC "MB". The existing MCC"M" is scheduled to be removed under a
future project. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-139)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2.075.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 10—MODIFY PIPING IN POLYMER AREA
This item is for miscellaneous modifications to the drain and bubbler piping in the polymer area.
This work is necessary to eliminate inaccurate readings of the bubbler system caused from the
turbulence. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-122)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 467.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 — REMOVE TEMPORARY BYPASS PIPING
This item provides labor and equipment to remove the temporary WAS bypass piping that was
installed earlier on this project. This work was done per the request of the District's Operations
Department. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-143)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,454.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2
ITEM 12 —PIPING MODIFICATIONS IN DAF FACILITY, RAS AND WAS AREAS
This item provides piping modifications in the DAF facility, RAS and WAS areas to gain
accessibility to miscellaneous equipment. This work was generated by a recommendation from
District staff during the beneficial occupancy walkthrough. This item was accomplished by
Contradofs tome account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO P1362-144)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,932 .00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 13—REIMBURSEMENT FOR DAMAGE REPAIR AT TRUCK LOADING
This credit item is for reimbursement of the District's labor, equipment, and materials costs for
dean up, testing, and inspecting the repair of the truck loading facility. A subcontractor of
Margate Construction drove through the truck loading station and damaged the District's sludge
loading equipment. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-145)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,317.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 14—ADD FLOOR DRAIN AT POLYMER AREA
This item is for labor and material to install a floor drain at the polymer mixing area. The existing
polymer area has poor drainage. The new drain will eliminate the ponding problems and improve
safety for District personnel working in this area. This item was accomplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO
P1362-146)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,783.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 6 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2
ITEM 15—MODIFY HVAC DUCT IN DAF AREA
This item is for labor to modify a duct in the DAF area to eliminate turbulence that was causing
excessive vibration in an exhaust fan. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 762.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 60,150.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
i
Page 7 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime
work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time
made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no
time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995
Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 256 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 1,156 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 16, 1998
Projected Completion Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 35,291,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 338,753.00
This Change Order(Add) $ 60,150.00
Amended Contract Price $ 35,689,903.00
r
(
Page 8 of 8
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seventeen (17)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2
Board Acceptance Date: March 24, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Su itled by. '
fl• 3-3
C -
nstruction Ma ager Date
:Direcktor
3-51Engineering Date
Accepted by
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION
1 ?i-1-Oq
Contractor Date
PDC COMMITTEE Mee nq Da a To Btl.of D r.
3/9/99 3/29/93
AGENDA REPORT I em Number I e ym
PD R9-
Orange County Sanitation Di
FROM: David Lu rector of Engineering
Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide
SUBJECT: ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-40-3
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Accept Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-3, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement with Pave West.
SUMMARY
Job No. P1-40-3, Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1, provides for
improvements to drainage and asphalt in seven different locations at Plant
No. 1. The project includes removal and replacement of asphalt and the addition of
drains in the plant. Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and
specifications and the contract was awarded to Pave West on June 24, 1998. This
project is now complete.
Contract Start Date Sept. 15, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999
Actual Completion Date Feb. 11, 1999
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 171,717.00
Total Contract Change Orders $ 4,962.00
Percentage Increase 2.89%
Final Adjusted Amount $ 176,679.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: A.S.d)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Cost for the Construction Staff Task on the Budget Information Table has exceeded the
approved budget for this task. Surplus budget funds are being transferred from the
Construction Contract and Contingency Tasks to provide for the overrun. The total
project budget will not increase.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
PP:Ic
WntglobaMgenda Draft ReportsTMP 7-00.3AR-Close0ul-MAR.doc
Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-40-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ S
Design Staff $ $
Consultant PSA $ $
Construction Contract $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ 7000 $ 183'000 $ 171.717 $ 4,962 $ 176.679 $ 172,545 98%
Construction Other $ $
Construction Star/ $ 19,000 $ 19,000 $ 18,000 $ 37,000 $ 19.000 It 18,000 $ 37,000 $ 36.224 98%
Contingency $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ $
TOTAL $ 220.000 1 $ 220. 00 S - $ 220,000 $ 190,717 $ 22,962 1 $ 213,679 $ 208.769 1 98%
h'."dk,e`enp1._1001 Budget Table
Form Revised!1211798
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Asphalt and Drainage Improvements at Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-40-3
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE
AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE
. (DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 9/15198 $ 171,717 $ 171.717 0.00 150 150
CO NO 1' 2111/99 $ 4,962 $ 176,679 2.89 0 150
*Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
H:\wp.dwengllobs contrect\p1403TM3.xls=Stet apt
S
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 3/2 ad.4/99 of Dlr.
3/4/99
AGENDA REPORT QtDCNumb'O t lwe
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering
Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager
SUBJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION,
JOB NO. P1-51 (REBID)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,
Job No. P1-51 (Rebid), with AirPol Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of
$25,975 and 14 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $989,809;
and (2) Accept Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement with AirPoi
Construction, Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 4 includes four items of added work to Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)
and one item for liquidated damages. There are no errors or omissions
associated with this change order. There is a 14 day time extension associated
with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500.00 per day
and there are no bonus provisions. The Contractor was assessed two days of
liquidated damages for late delivery of the compressor, which was beyond the
milestone dated specified in Change Order No. 3. This change order is within
the delegated authority granted by Board Resolution 98-8 for General Manager
approval, however, the change order was prepared in conjunction with the
Closeout Agreement. This project has been completed.
Contract Start Date Mar. 12, 1996
Original Contract Completion Date July 29, 1997
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4
Current Contract Completion Date Oct. 30, 1998
Actual Completion Date Oct. 30, 1998
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 2
Liquidated Damage Assessment $1,000.
%cI,alMala l N,gloLaM9anda Daft rbftfts D6UR P151R W1W21N Rc Page
i
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 663,856.00
Previously Authorized Changes 299,978.00
This Change (Add) 25,975.00
Change Orders to Date 325,953.00
Percentage Increase to Date 49.10%
Amended Contract Price $ 989,809.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Ptant 1 5G)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Costs for Design and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table
exceeded the approved budget for these tasks. Surplus budget funds are being
transferred from the Consultant PSA and Construction Contract Tasks to provide
funds for these overruns. The total budget will not increase.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This project provides for construction of a compressed natural gas (CNG)
refueling station at Reclamation Plant No. 1 to service biosolids hauling trucks.
A public service station is also being constructed as part of this contract to serve
local government agencies and the public. The Gas Company prepared the
plans and specifications at no cost and the contract was awarded to AirPol
Construction, Inc. on Dec. 18, 1996. The following summarizes the change
order.
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Electrical and Telephone Service $ 5,670 4 Changed
Addition at Public Dispenser Condition
2 Compressor Skid Electrical 7,862 4 Design Change
Modifications
3 Compressor and Dryer Skid 8,868 4 Design Change
Mechanical Modifications and
Startup
4 Telephone and Communication 4,575 2 Design Change
Cable Addition
5 Liquidated damages (1,000) 0 Other
TOTAL—Change Order No. 4 $ 25,975 14
w.mru,e,wmrwuMm a.nxm,nwmnavu,amam:�eaas Page 2
f
f,
All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original
contract if discovered or known in the design phase.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Notice of Exemption filed in August, 1996.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
JBF:Ic
mse. IVVPee gwdaa RepenIPOLURP%S1P.COa.61ttYB hr Page
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION
JOB NO. P1-51(REBID)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%I'
"t J
Project Developmenl $ (139,500) $ (139,500) $ (139,500) �� $ (139.500) $ (139,500) $ (139,500) 100%
Design Staff $ $ - $ - $ 0%
Consultant PSA $ 94,500 $ 114,500 $ 114.500 $ 114,500 $ 114,500 $ 100,000 87%
Construction Contract $ 426,074 $ 963.834 $ 25,975 $ 989,809 $ 963,834 $ 25,975 $ 989,809 $ 901,614 91%
Construction(Other) $ 454,300 $ 389,566 $ (25,975) $ 363,591 $ 389,666 $ 25,975 $ 363,591 $ 353,802 97%
Construction Staff $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 234.048 138%
Conlin ency $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0%
TOTAL $ 835,374 $ 1,503.400 $ - $ 1,503,400 $ 1,503,400 $ - $ 1,503.400 $ 1.449,964 1 98%
h:k".MebngUOBSCONTRACTWI-S1R%Change OMerslBwgsl.t.b C04.X13
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION
JOB NO. P7-51 (REBID)
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 3112197 $ 633,856.00 $ 633,856.00 140 140
CO NO 1' 1/5/98 $ 12,388.00 $ 646,244.00 1.95 0 140
CO NO 2- 3/12198 $ - $ 646,244.00 1.95 0 140
CO NO 3 3125/98 $ 287,590.00 $ 933,834.00 47.33 444 584
CO NO Pending $ 25.975.00 $ 989,809.00 49.10% 1 14 598
Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
Change.Order. Status.CO4.xls
Page 1 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Peduet) $ 25,975.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions
from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —ADDITION OF ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE SERVICE CONDUITS AND PULL
BOXES AT THE PUBLIC DISPENSER
The Contractor was directed to reroute electrical power and telephone service to the new natural
gas public dispenser station near the main entrance of Plant 1. The contract drawings required
the contractor to utilize existing conduits and pull boxes serving the waste hauler control building.
The conduits and boxes were not available for use. Additional work including trenching, removal
of an undisclosed concrete obstruction, installation of new 1-inch electrical and telephone
conduits and fittings, placement of red concrete ductbank encasement, installation of new
electrical and telephone pullboxes, and core drilling the masonry block wall of the wastehauler
station. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-
6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,670.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—COMPRESSOR SKID ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to research and prepare new termination drawings for the gas
compressor skid and dispensers. Also included in this item is the addition of two new NEMA 3R
junction boxes, which were required to make the final electrical connections to the compressor
skid. The contract drawings originally prepared by the Gas Company were based on a gas
compressor skid purchased by the District from PennWilson. Due to default by Penn Wilson, it
was necessary for the District to purchase a new gas compressor skid from IMW Atlas. The
electrical configuration for the IMW Atlas compressor skid required modification of the contract
drawings to make the system operate. The contract drawings did not show the added junction
boxes, which were required to make the final electrical connections to the IMW Atlas compressor `
skid. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 4)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,862.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
ltrdw%debl Wv dl ngUOBS 8 CONTRACTSW151 R`c ngeoNem=4do
I
Page 2 of 4
1
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)
ITEM 3—COMPRESSOR SKID AND DRYER MECHANICAL MODIFICATIONS AND STARTUP
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a control line from the natural gas dryer
humidifier sensor to the gas compressor skid blowdown tanks. Also included is the cost of labor
for startup of the gas dryer skid, which was purchased by the District. The work included
trenching, installation of the `'/,inch stainless steel tubing and controls from the dryer skid to the
gas compressor skid, connections, backfll and paving. The contract drawings did not show the
control line interconnection between the dryer and the gas compressor. Startup of the natural
gas dryer skid was not included in the contract. This work was accomplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference:
FCO No. 5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,868.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
ITEM 4—TELEPHONE AND COMMUNICATION CABLE ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install emergency telephones and communication
cable to connect the gas compressor skid and dispensers to the District communication system.
Cable was installed from the basement of the blower building to the gas compressor skid and the
transit dispenser card reader. One telephone was installed adjacent to the gas compressor skid.
Another telephone was installed at the public dispenser near the front entrance at Plant 1 and
communication cable was run from the dispenser to the waste hauler control building. The
emergency telephones and cabling were not included in the contract. This work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,575.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
ITEM 5—LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
A milestone date of September 11, 1998 was established for delivery of the gas compressor
package unit to the District at Plant No. 1. The compressor skid was delivered two days beyond
the milestone date. The Contractor is therefore assessed 2 days of liquidated damages at
$500.00 per day for a total of$1,000.00. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(1,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 25,975.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days
ftdm'Aztat Wv AaY. UOBS 8 CONTRACTST151RWongeordersl 4Aw
Page 3 of 4
Y
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. AirPol Construction, Inc. C.O. No .: Four(4)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime
work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time
made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 14
day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: March 12, 1997
Original Contract Time: 140 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: July 29, 1997
Time Extension this C.O.: 14 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 458 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 598 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 30, 1998
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 2 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date: October 30, 1998
Original Contract Price $ 663,856.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 299,978.00
This Change(Add)(8edust) $ 25,975.00
Amended Contract Price S 989.8 99.00
\ bdon`datal".Al nvoBs 8 CONTRACMP151 Mc Ma g.rd.\C04.d.
Page 4 of 4 V
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELUS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. AlrPOI Construction Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refuellno Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)
Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Sub ihed by:
3-,- �
CA sWelion Menaper
d bY•
Dis
tlmr Fltpbr **V Date
Accepted by
AIRPOL C#RUCTION, INC.
Co act 17
r 'Date
H:WP.Men9U0HS a CONTRACTSIPI-31 R"rG=*mIC0-4.dw
PDC COMMITTEE Meebng Date To Bd.of Dir.
3 499 3-2199
AGENDA REPORT IemN.mbr Imm
DC44-U
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David LudwJector of Engineering
Originator: George Thuro, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE,
JOB NO. J-31-3
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget amendment of$265,000 to authorize additional funds for Plant 1
Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total project budget of
$1,811,000.
SUMMARY
The Board adopted the current budget on July 1, 1998 as part of the Budget for Fiscal
Year 1998-1999. The original contract completion date was October 11, 1998. This job
incorporates a liquidated damages clause of$ 1000 per day. The current estimated
completion of this project is May 1, 1999, which is eight months after the original
contract date. Change Orders are projected to be under 5 percent of the original
contract amount. The contract delays are due to change orders, contractor
performance, and computer programming delays. District staff is providing the
programming. However, this programming is being delayed as the Y2K and other
construction projects are taking priority. The additional funds requested are for
additional staff labor cost, overhead costs, and other direct cost. A net budget increase
of$ 265,000 is requested to bring the total project budget to $ 1,811,000.
Contract Start Date December 16, 1997
Original Contract Completion Date October 11, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date February 15, 1999
Projected Completion Date May 1, 1999
Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.(Line nem:la)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Costs for the Construction Staff Task on the Budget Information Table exceeded the
approved budget for that task. Funds for this cost overrun are being provided by
utilizing the current project contingency fund and by requesting approval for additional
funds.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Staff predicts the project completion will be delayed until May of this year.
Change Order No. 1 extends the contract date from October 11, 1998 to February 15,
1999. The change order grants the Contractor the time extension on a concurrent delay
basis, where both the Contractor and the District have delayed completion of the job.
The District delays were primarily due to time taken to respond to Contractor requests
for information regarding existing equipment circuitry, to produce the subsequent plan
changes, and to implement the changed work. There are not any Contractor extended
overhead costs associated with this time extension nor liquidated damages assessed by
the Districts.
Subsequent to the time extension associated with Change Order No. 1, the District has
encountered delays in completing computer programming required to start up and test
the equipment provided on the contract. Programming staff efforts have been diverted
to the Y2K project and other construction projects. Another time extension will be
negotiated with the Contractor to delay start up testing until after the program can be
developed.
Primarily, the additional budget being requested is for staff labor cost and overhead for
additional construction management, shop drawing review, change order development,
and record drawing production. The costs for these tasks were underestimated in the
current budget. Additional costs are also being incurred by the extended contract time.
Staff projects an additional $ 363,000 for construction management will be required to
complete the project.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEDA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
W Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Table
GT:Ic
WntgbbaMpenda DnR Repoftl MWIl PDC Age Repel MARCH 1999.Cx
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE
JOB NO. J-31-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT[TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%(
Project Development
Design Staff $ 43.320 $ 43,320 $ 43.320 $ 43,320 $ 43,320 $ 43,320 100%
Consultant PSA Is 343,130 $ 343.130 $ 343,130 $ 343.130 $ 343,130 1 $ 343,130 100%
V
tract $ 694.000 $ 694.000 $ 694,000 $ 693,646 $ 693.646 $ 557,897 80%
her
ff $ 367,550 S 367.550 $ 363,000 $ 730,550 $ 367.550 $ 363,000 $ 730,550 $ 495.985 68%
$ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $$ 1,546,000 $ 1,546,000 $ 265,000 $ 1.811.000 S 1447.646 $ 363,000 $ 1810,646 $ 1,440.332 80%
J31.3 Bu42et TeEla.Mama B ud Bu4pet Rw,Revised 294/99
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE
JOB NO. J-31-3
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 12/16/97 $ 694,000.00 $ 694,000.00 300 300
CO NO. 1• Pending $ (354.00) $ 693,646.00 (0.02) 127 427
Pending approval by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
J-31-3,COSTAT COI
PDC COMMITTEE MeetlngDate
3/4/99 TO BA.
3/34/9 ofgDir.
Number AGENDA REPORT IOemNumtem m
DCN umber I J
Orange County Sanitation Distri
FROM: David Lud irector of Engineering
Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS
JOB NO. SP19980015
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Accept Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, Job No. SP19980015, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement with Power Distributors, Inc.
SUMMARY
Job No. SP19980015, Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications, provided four areas of
improvements to miscellaneous lighting at Plant No. 1 and 2. This project included
removal and replacement of light fixtures and added lighting. TMAD Consulting
Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to
Power Distributors, Inc. on May 27, 1998. This project has been completed.
Contract Start Date July 14, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 0
Current Contract Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998
Actual Completion Date Sept. 12, 1998
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 67,500.00
Total Contract Change Orders $ 0.00
Percentage Increase 0%
Final Adjusted Amount $ 67,500.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities, 6h)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Costs for the Design and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget Information Table
exceeded the approved budget for these tasks. Surplus budget funds are being
transferred from the Consultant PSA and Construction Contract Tasks to provide funds
for these overruns. The total project budget will not increase.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
PP:Ic
PcobaftAala I Wgloba Mgenda Draft ReponsNDClSP98OD15AR-CloseOut-MAR.dm
Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Miscellaneous Lighting Modifications
JOB NO. 19980015
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $
Design Stag $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 3,667 $ 5.667 $ 2,000 $ 3,667 $ 5,667 $ 5,667 100%
Consultant PSA $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ (2.800)1 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17.200 100%
Construction Contract $ 95.000 $ 95.000 $ (27.500) $ 67,500 $ 87,500 $ 67.500 $ 60,750 90%
Construction(Other) $ $
Construction Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 26,633 $ 31,633 $ 5,000 $ 28.633 $ 31,633 $ 28,848 91%
Contingency $ $
TOTAL is 122,000 $ 122.000 $ - $ 122,000 is 91.700 1 $ 30.300 $ 122,000 $ 112.465 92%
h%.p.dtM@ng1..MAget table
Form Revised 1L17MB
PDC COMMITTEE M eang Me Tct:tD..
3/4/99 3/24/99
r AGENDA REPORT Item NumW ItemN
Orange County Sanitation District PD099-1$
rL
FROM: David Ludwl , hector of Engineering
Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33-1, with Verne's Plumbing, Inc. authorizing an addition of$250
increasing the total contract amount to $36,950; and (2) Accept Beautification of Bay
Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Verne's
Plumbing, Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work to Contract No_ 5-33-1. The item
is an omission. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per calendar day and
there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed.
Contract Start Date July 20, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998
Actual Completion Date Oct. 15, 1998
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 36.700
This Change(Add) $ 250
Percentage Increase 0,68 %
Final Contract Price $ 36,950
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Zone 5, Item b)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable(information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, provides for a new
concrete driveway, access gates, and doors. The plans and specifications were
prepared by District staff. The construction contract was awarded to Veme's Plumbing,
Inc. on May 27, 1998. The contract is now complete.
The following table summarizes the Change Order:
ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
NO.
1 Wall Drains 250 0 Omission
TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 $ 250 0
This item would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in
the design phase. There is no rework involved.
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
TH:lc
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $
Design Staff $ 9,000 $ 9000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9.000 $ 6.846 75%
Consultant PSA I I $ $
Construction Contract $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37.000 $ 36.700 $ 260 $ 36,950 $ 35.783 97%
Construction Other $ $
Construction Staff $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,781 103%
Contin enc $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $
TOTAL $ 80,000 $ 80.000 $ - $ 80,000 1 1 $ 73.700 1 $ 250 1 $ 73,950 $ 71,410 1 97%
hA\ ,.dWn n9Vormsfbutl9et table
Form RavieaL 12117198
e.
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 7/20/98 $ 36,700.00 $ 36,700.00 90 90
CO NO. 1 Pending $ 250.00 $ 36,950.00 0.68% 0 90
H:Wp.dtabnglENGlS33.11C01chngstal xls
a
a Page 1 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station Contract No. 5-33-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) $ 250.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - PROVIDE OUTLET DRAIN IN PERIMETER WALL
The Contractor was directed to core drill at the bottom of the westerly block wall fence to allow for
drainage of rainwater, etc., out of the building grounds. The drainage had been omitted from the
contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 250,00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 250.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (t)
Date: March 24, 1999
Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33.1
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extension to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is there fore mutually agreed that no time extension is
required for this Change Order and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: July 20, 1998
Original Contract Time: 90 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: October 15, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension:. 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 90 Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 15, 1998
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A
Actual Final Completion Dale: October 15, 1998
Original Contract Price $ 36,700.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change(Add) (9edusl) $ 250.00
Amended Contract Price $ 36,950.00
i Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Veme's Plumbing, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Contract: Beautification of Bay Bridge PUMP Station, Contract No. 5.33-1
Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Reviewed by:
Co slructton Manager Dale
0'
AID rov y:
t
3 3 99
Director of Engineering Date
_Accept by:
Conlr ctor Date
t ti P g. j
r2�l.i S i D'EJ
PDC COMMITTEE Me ng Da TO Bd.Of Dir.
3- 99 3-zags
T AGENDA REPORT Pce"vat t fWmNj ")
n
Orange County Sanitation Di 'dt
FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering
Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No.1, to Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7-1, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$262,274, and 203
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,656,974; and (2) Approve a
budget amendment of$351,000 to authorize additional funds, for a total project budget
of$4,232,000.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 1 includes 30 items of added work to Contract No. 7-7-1. There are
7 omission items associated with this change order. There is a 203 calendar day time
extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are
$750.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The Board adopted the current
budget on July 1, 1998 as part of the Budget for Fiscal Year 1998-1999. This budget
was estimated with a 5 percent allowance for change order contingency and a projected
contract completion date in September 1998. The contract is currently projected to be
completed in March 1999. Change orders are currently projected to be approximately
17 percent of the original contract amount. The funds requested are for additional labor,
overhead, and change order contingency to complete the project. A net budget
increase of$351,000 is requested to bring the total project budget to $4,232,000.
Contract Start Date June 2, 1997
Original Contract Completion Date June 27, 1998
Total Number of Change Orders To Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date January 16, 1999
Projected Completion Date March 31, 1999
Projected Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0
Projected Liquidated Damages Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
f
Original Contract Price $ 2,394,700.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change(Add) $ 262,274.00
Change Orders to Date $ 262,274.00
Percentage Increase to Date 10.95 %
Amended Contract Price $ 2,656,974.00
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) Y
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
(Line Item:Zone 7, Item b;Zone 14. Item a)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Cost for the Construction Contract and Construction Staff Tasks on the Budget
Information Table have overrun the current budget. Funds for these cost overruns are
being provided by utilizing the current project contingency fund and by requesting
approval for additional budget funds.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This project adds a permanent generator building and outfits the second half of the Main
Street Pump Station with five new pumps and motors and two variable frequency drives
(VFDs). The existing side of the station will receive two new VFDs. The plans and
specifications for this contract were prepared by Boyle Engineering. The construction
contract was awarded to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. on April 23, 1997. The Contract is 90
percent complete. The following table summarizes Change Order No. 1.
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Changes to Elecbrical and $96,432 161 Design Change
Instrumentation
2 Fuel Containment Piping 23 694 17 Other
3 Addition of Missing Conduits 21,332 14 Design Change
4 Electrical Changes to Fans 16,616 11 Design Change
5 Conduit Material Change 7,099 0 Design Change
6 Reroute Waterline 1,646 0 Design Change
7 Emergency Light Fixture Change 1,343 0 Design Change
8 Duct and Joist Interference 1,595 0 Omission
9 Hoses for Pump Packing Drains 571 0 Design Change
10 Address Sin 475 0 Design Change
11 Overtime for Wet Well Work 236 0 Design Change
12 Silencer Support Modifications 7,774 0 Omission
13 Fire Hydrant Installation 21 127 0 Changed Condition
14 Reroute Conduit in Motor Room 9,398 0 Changed Condition
15 Light Fixture Relocation 3,794 0 Omission
16 1 Motor Control Revisions 5,709 0 Omission
17 Separation of Voltages in Conduits 10134 0 1 Design Change
18 Wiring Change for Motor RTDs 2.704 0 Omission
19 Controls for Fuel Pump 5,407 0 Omission '
20 Generator Day tank Vent 1,809 0 Omission
21 Pump Shaft Alignment 392 0 Changed Condition
22 Replace Existing Valve 458 0 Design Change
23 Valve Repair 2,771 0 Design Change
24 Bleeder Piping Repair 1,844 0 Design Change
Page 2
25 Motor Base Seal Modifications 2,545 0 Design Change
26 Exhaust Piping Insulation 952 0 Design Change
27 Pipe Modification at Existing Vault 7,582 0 Changed Condition
28 Miscellaneous HVAC Changes 2,191 0 Design Change
29 Underground Tank Leak Alarm 575 0 Design Change
Training
30 Catwalk Bracing 4.069 0 Design Change
TOTAL-Change Order No. 1 $262,274 203
Item 1 includes 126 calendar days of concurrent delays, where both the Contractor and
the District have delayed the project. Item 1 also includes an additional 35 calendar
days with Contractor extended overhead cost. Items 2, 3, and 4 also include extended
overhead cost for an additional 42 calendar days. Items 8, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20
are omissions.
An additional time extension will be requested in a future change order for items not
included in this change order. As of January, staff has negotiated an additional 73
calendar day time extension for change order items to be submitted in the future. This
time includes additional extended overhead cost and will revise the contract date to
March 31, 1999. The final costs of the ongoing change order work have not been
negotiated. Additional budget for the construction contract will be requested with the
change order.
Regarding this budget increase, the additional funds requested for this project provide
for additional staff time required to complete the extended project, the associated staff
overhead allocations, and change order costs.
ALTERNATIVE
None
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final
IER was approved on July 19, 1998 and the Notice of Determination was filed on
July 30, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
TH:Ic
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $
Design Staff $ 83,000 S 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ 83,000 S 83,000 100%
Consultant PSA Is 212.000 $ 360.351 1 $ 360.351 1 $ 350.351 1 $ 360.351 1 $ 340.711 95%
k
ction Contract $ 690,000 $ 2,394,700 $ 262,274 $ 2,656,974 $ 2.394,700 $ 262,274 $ 2,656,974 $ 2,314394 87%
ction Other $ Ection Staff S 265,000 $ 802.949 $ 328.726 $ 1.131.675 $ 802,949 $ 328,726 $ 1,131,675 S 818,674 72%
enc $ 240.000 $ 240,000 $ $
TOTAL $ 1.250.000 1 $ 3,881,000 1 $ 351,000 $ 4,232,000 $ 3,641,000 $ 591,000 $ 4.232,000 $ 3.556.779 84%
C077141 BUDGET TABLE2
Form ReWea41251MB
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 612/97 $ 2,394,700.00 390 390
CO NO. 1 Pending $ 262,274.00 $ 2,656,974.00 10.95% 203 593
H',1wpAla`eng\ENGA-7-1\C01 CHNGSTAT
y Page 1 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
105" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1
Amount of this Change Order(Add)$ 262,274 00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - CHANGES TO ELECTRICAL AND INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
This item is for changes to the Field Control Panel (FCP) and miscellaneous changes to the power,
control and instrumentation systems. The control panel size, programmable logic controller(PLC)
input and output, and the rating of the unintenuptible power supply was increased to provide the
capability to update the controls of the existing sewage pumps in the future. Controls for the existing
pumps were not part of this contract. The item also includes an additional level transmitter, redundant
power supplies in PLC remote 1/0 rack, additional PLC programmed I/O, and computer hardware
compatible with the District CRISP SCADA system standards to improve the reliability of pump station
controls. This hem also provides for remote operation and monitoring of the pump station which is not
part of the original design. Cost for this item includes $37,515 of Contractor extended overhead cost
for 35 days of the 161-calendar day time extension. There are no extended overhead costs for the
balance of the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 771-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 96,432.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 161 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—REPLACEMENT OF FUEL CONTAINMENT PIPING
This Rem is for the replacement of proposed containment piping for the underground fuel tank. The
piping specified was not approved by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) during a field
inspection. OCHCA required that the pipe be certified by the Underwriters Laboratory, which is more
stringent than state code requirements. The state code allows other independent laboratory
certifications. This item contains direct costs for materials, demolition of pipe, reinstallation, testing ,
and OCHCA inspections. Cost for this item includes $11,475 of extended Contractor overhead
associated with the time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-27)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,694.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 17 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 11 W
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1
ITEM 3—ADDITION OF MISSING CONDUITS AND WIRES
This item is to provide additional conduits and wires for the motor control center, remote terminal unit,
and the instrumentation cabinet. These conduit and wires provided control integration of the existing
pumps with the pump controls for the new pumps. The conduits and wires were not part of the original
design. Cost for this item includes $9,450 of extended Contractor overhead associated with the time
extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the
General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-16)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21.332.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
ITEM 4 - ELECTRICAL CHANGES TO FANS AND FIELD CONTROL PANEL -
This item is for conduit and wiring changes to the fan flow switches and the Field Control Panel (FCP)
to provide isolated conduit for circuits with different voltages. The work consisted of the installation of
new conduits, relays, fuse blocks, and changed wiring. Different voltage circuits are pulled in conduits
dedicated to a given voltage. This change will improve safety and reliability of the pump station. Cost
for this item includes $ 7,425 of extended Contractor overhead associated with the time extension.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General
Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-13)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $16,616.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 11 Calendar Days
ITEM 5- CONDUIT MATERIAL CHANGE
This item is for changing all power and control conduit materials to conform to the District's standard of
using PVC-coated aluminum. The contract documents specify PVC coated galvanized steel conduit
instead of aluminum. This change is comprised of the costs of material only. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(6)2(a) of the General provisions. (Reference FCO 771-2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7.099.00 r
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 6- REROUTE EXISTING WATERLINE
This item is for rerouting the existing City waterline in several locations to avoid interference with new
electrical equipment and fans. These conflicts were not identified in the contract documents. Also
included in this work is the repair of an existing waterline. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
y Page 3 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1
ITEM 6 . REROUTE EXISTING WATERLINE (Cont.)
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-4)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,646.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 7- EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE CHANGE
This item is for changing the emergency light fixtures to meet District standards requiring a 12-volt
system, stand-by battery with a 90-minute life, and 18-watt lamps. This change is comprised of
material costs only. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of
the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1.343.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8- INTERFERENCE OF DUCT WITH CEILING JOIST
This Rem is for relocating existing ceiling joist bracing not shown on the contract drawings. This
relocation was necessary due to interference of this bracing with new air duct. This Rem was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference
FCO 771-9)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,595.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 9-ADDITION OF HOSES FOR PUMP PACKING DRAINAGE
This item is for providing pump packing drain hoses on all five new pumps. The hoses are not required
by the contract documents, but are required to route the drain water to an adjacent sump. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference FCO 771-11)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 571.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station. Contract No. 7-7-1
ITEM 10-ADDRESS SIGN ON PUMP STATION BUILDING
This item is for the installation of an address sign on the existing Pump Station building in accordance
with an Orange County Fire Authority requirement. The address sign was not required by the contract
documents. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provision. (Reference FCO 771-18)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 475.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 - OVERTIME CHARGE FOR WORK IN WET WELL
This item is for Contractor overtime. OCSD asked the Contractor to work overtime to minimize the
District's costs to keep the existing wet-well dry for contract work. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $236.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 12- GENERATOR SILENCER SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS
This item is for modification of the generator silencer support and the generator exhaust piping. The
silencer support had to be changed from ceiling truss supported, as shown on the drawings, to floor
supported, due to the heavy weight of the silencer. The exhaust piping as specified in the contract
documents interferes with the ceiling of the Generator Building and had to be modified. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference
FCO 771-5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,774.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 13 - FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION
This item is to provide a fire hydrant just outside the Main Street Pump Station property. The work
includes traffic control, excavation, live water main tie-in, piping, valves, backfill, street and sidewalk
repairs and permit fees. This work was mandated by the Orange County Fire Authority and was not
u
Page 5 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1
ITEM 13 - FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION (Cont.)
included in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-12)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,127.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 14. REROUTE EXISTING CONDUIT IN MOTOR ROOM
This item is for rerouting of several existing conduits in the motor room to eliminate a conflict with
proposed conduits. While performing contract work, the Contractor discovered undisclosed conduits in
the motor room floor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of
the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9.398.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 15— LIGHT FIXTURE WIRING AND RELOCATION
This item is to provide new power supply conduits for existing station lights and to relocate proposed
interior station lights to eliminate a conflict with proposed air ducting. The wiring requirements for the
existing station lights were omitted from the drawings. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,794.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 16—MOTOR CONTROL REVISIONS
This item is for re-wiring of existing pump electrical buckets to accept the new Lock Out Stop Jog
control circuitry. The jog control schematics were omitted from the contract drawings. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference _
FCO 771-7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,709.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 6 of 11 U
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor SVERDRUP CIVIL INC C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station Contract No. 7-7-1
ITEM 17—SEPARATION OF VOLTAGES IN CONDUITS
This item is to provide additional conduits to allow separation of circuits with different voltages. This
change will improve safety and reliability of the pump station. The contract documents did not provide
for separation of the different classifications. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10.6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-8)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,134.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 18 -WIRING CHANGES TO MOTOR REMOTE TEMPERATURE DETECTORS (RTDs)
This item is for the addition of wiring to the RTDs for each new motor. The contract documents specify
an insufficient number of wires for the temperature detectors. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-14)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,70000
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 19 - CONTROL DESIGN FOR FUEL TANK TRANSFER PUMP
This item is to provide pump control for the underground tank fuel transfer pump. The contract
documents do not include a control design for this pump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(A) and (B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-15)
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,407.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 20—GENERATOR DAYTANK VENT
This item is for the installation of a vent-line on the generator day tank to vent tank diesel fumes to the
outside of the generator building. The applicable Fire Code mandates venting of diesel tanks to the
atmosphere, but the contract documents did not include a vent line. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a)of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-22)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,809.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
U Page 7 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL. INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station, Contract No. 7-7-1
ITEM 21 —EXISTING OFFSET OF PUMP SHAFT/MOTOR ALIGNMENT
This item is for additional field engineering. The work was necessary because the existing drive pump
shaft penetrations did not have a common centerline as shown on the contract documents. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference FCO 771-24)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $392.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 22— REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING IRRIGATION GATE VALVE
This item is for the replacement of an existing irrigation gate valve on the Main Street Pump Station
property. The valve was leaking. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-25)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $458.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 23—EXISTING AIRIVACUUM VALVE REPAIR
This item is for rebuilding the existing air/vacuum valve mounted on the East Baker Force Main. This
valve showed excessive leakage when sewage was pumped through the force main. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference
FCO 771-26)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,771.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 24—BLEEDER PIPING MODIFICATION
r
This item is for the installation of a gate valve on the bleeder piping of each pump system. These gate
valves are not required by the contract documents, but were requested by the District maintenance
department to facilitate their maintenance work.This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-28)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,844.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 8 of 11 p
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL INC C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1
ITEM 25—MOTOR BASE SEAL MODIFICATIONS
This item is to provide rolled steel plate covers to seal the motor base openings. The seals are
required to separate the atmosphere between the motor room and dry pit per code requirements. The
revised seals are easier to maintain. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-32)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,545.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 26—ADDITIONAL EXHAUST PIPING INSULATION
This item is for the installation of additional generator exhaust piping insulation. The District modified
the piping from the contract documents. As a result, more insulation work had to be performed by the
Contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a)of the
General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $952.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 27— PIPING MODIFICATION IN EAST VAULT
This item is field modifying the proposed 36-inch steel discharge force main. This force main is routed
through an existing valve vault that had settled prior to this project. The vault was raised back to the
original elevation by pressure grouting under a separate specialty contract. However, the work was
unable to achieve the needed alignment. The work includes cutting,welding, lining and mating, and
assisting the specialty contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-35, FCO 771-33)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,582.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 9 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX $127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No 7-7-1
ITEM 28—MISCELLANEOUS HVAC CHANGES
This item is for the addition of a fan access door, a stainless steel frame to the south wall louver, and
closures around the new doors. These items were not part of the contract documents, but had to be
added for proper equipment installation, maintenance and operation. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-37)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,191.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 29—UNDERGROUND TANK LEAK ALARM PROGRAMMING AND TRAINING
This item is for underground tank leak alarm programming and underground tank monitor training. The
District elected to modify the alarm programming of the tank to alert the District Control Center to fuel
piping leaks. The training provided by the Contractor to the District was not part of the contract
documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions. (Reference FCO 771-38)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $575.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 30- CATWALK COLUMN BRACING
This item is for the installation of braces between the existing catwalk columns. The columns are not
sufficiently rigid to support the attached new drive shaft bearing supports without vibrating. The work
includes structural steel cutting, welding, anchor bolt installation, and painting. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference
FCO 771-39)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,069.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $262,274.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 203 Calendar Days
Page 10 of 11 U
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date. March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 203 day extension
of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by the Contractor, except as
expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Dale: June 2, 1997
Original Contract Time: 390 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: June 27, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 203 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 203 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 593 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 16, 1999
Projected Completion Date: April 30, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: None
Actual Final Completion Date: N/A
Original Contract Price $ 2,394,700.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 262,274.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,656,974.00
Page 11 of 11
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 24, 1999
Job: Improvements to Main Street Pumo Station, Contract No. 7-7-1
Board Authorization Date: March 24, 1999
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
S itted by:
3 -5-
y
ns ruction Manager Date
A rov
3-/�
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
SVERDRUP CML
!ems_-�4
Contractor Date
H:WpAbWgVOBS 8 CONTRACTSV-7-11Chenge OrcW No.'11C0 771-014=
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, March 10, 1999, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on March 10, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Terry Andrus, General Counsel
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Stephen Sheldon, Sheldon &Associates
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Adam Probolsky, Adam D. Probolsky&Associates
Shawn Boyd Toby Weissen, Carollo Engineers
John M. Gullixson
Mark A. Murphy STAFF PRESENT:
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair
John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay, Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Directors Absent: Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Shirley McCracken Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
Mike White, Controller
Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer
Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
Cost) • P.O.sox 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 • (714) 962-2411
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 2
March 10, 1999
(4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carded to approve the minutes of the February 10, 1999,
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
• Chair Saltarelli reminded the Committee that a FAHR Committee Workshop is scheduled for
April 10, 1999, at 9:00 p.m., and that all Directors are being invited.
• The next regular FAHR meeting is scheduled for April 14, 1999, at 5:00 p.m.
• There will be a closed session tonight regarding the status of labor negotiations with the
Supervisory and Professional Employees.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported that Supervisor Jim Silva will be on the Board and will
be a member of the FAHR Committee beginning in April.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on his trip to Washington,
D.C. last week. He advised that he, and representatives of the Municipal Water District of
Orange County and the Orange County Water District, met with politicians from Orange County
regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) project, and their continued interest
in receiving funding of$20 million from the Bureau of Reclamation to help support the cost.
They also met with some Watershed members from Riverside and San Bernardino County to
discuss watershed issues such as flood control and manure management.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Mr. Streed advised that several reports were placed before the Directors just prior to the
meeting.
• The Treasurer's Report for February was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in
accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements.
• A copy of a letter sent to Director McCraken, in response to some questions that the City of
Anaheim staff had regarding connection fees, was also distributed to the Committee. Most of
the City's questions could probably have been answered if they had access to the Carollo
report which was sent along with the letter. Mr. Streed noted that the questions from the City
were well drafted.
• A one-page rating summary for item 13(b) was also placed before the Committee.
• Another hand-out will also be distributed which responds to questions raised at the
Committee's February meeting regarding Capital Project cost allocations.
y
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
March 10, 1999
• Mr. Slreed announced that Board Secretary Penny Kyle will be taking over the FAHR
Committee Secretary responsibilities, due to a change in procedures. Penny will be
preparing the Agenda and taking the minutes possibly as early as next month.
• General Manager Don McIntyre further advised the Committee that Penny will be taking over
the responsibilities of all three Committees.
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources Mike Peternan had no report.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
• Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman reported that staff developed a new
Earthquake Preparedness brochure on personal wastewater management, and worked with
the Orange County Health Care Agency in compiling the material to make sure it met their
specifications and concerns. The Health Care Agency will also be distributing the brochure.
Copies are being sent to the cities, and will also be included in the packets we hand out at
the Orange County Fair.
• The information contained in another brochure distributed to the Directors in their Board
packets last month was received from an outside agency. Staff edited the material and
designed the brochure. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Office of
Pollution Prevention, was so pleased with the brochure that they have asked if they can use
it.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Terry Andrus had no report.
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- C)
A. FAHR99-12: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
February 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee
meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in
conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
B. FAHR99-13: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report,
C. FAHR99-14: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of February 25, 1999.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. There were none.
v
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting °
Page 4
March 10, 1999
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 12(A) through 12(C) under Consent Calendar.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A-C)
A. FAHR99-15: 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with
Makesense, Inc., for utility and telecommunications auditing services; and 2)
Approve such services on a contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) 50%
fee for all recovered overcharges and, b) the equivalent of twelve (12) months
savings for all implemented cost reduction strategies.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. The
Committee further directed staff to attempt to negotiate the fee downward.
B. FAHR99-16: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for a consultant to
review sewer service fees and Assessors data, and authorize the General Manager to
enter into a contingency fee agreement for services for a period of 12 months.
Mr. Streed reviewed the results of the interview panels for the Committee. A lengthy
discussion took place regarding whether or not the successful bidder should perform a
one or four-year collection effort, whether to use the new rate structure or the old one if
a four-year effort is selected, and the fees that the two bidders will charge for a one-
year effort. The Committee was unable to agree on awarding the project to either
bidder because one of the bidding firms had not included a firm price in their proposal
for a one-year effort. Several motions were made, amended and withdrawn. The final
approved motion follows:
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried, with one No vote, to direct staff to
contact both bidders requesting that they submit a best and final proposal, with
qualifications, on a one-year basis. This item is to be brought back to the
Committee next month with a staff recommendation.
C. FAHR99-17: Receive and file the preliminary FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement
Program Budget.
Director Swan requested that staff identify any projects that are brand new so that
a distinction can be made, since there are some in design and under construction.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
(14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION
A. Plant Reinvention and Automation Project Status Report.
Engineering Director David Ludwin introduced Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer, who
gave a presentation on the status of Job No. J-42, Plant Reinvention and Automation
Project.
�v
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 5
March 10, 1999
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 14, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
(19) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by
Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item
19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda
Item 19 (A)(1).
At approximately 8:05 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:10 p.m.
Submitted by: //�/
lq,w hat /
'Lahore Crane
FAHR Committee Secretary
H1wpdbYm IOcmm�MYPtlm DMWI=
FAHR COMMITTEE MeecngDm To3r.em.
03110t" 0312=
AGENDA REPORT I[em NumEer hem
rz1.1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
FEBRUARY 1999 (FAHR99-12)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused
by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
\YW nWdIM9 Al1M1nV10[n,wVIINFaMtlTW�L.WP912 Wr
n.A.e. 1W7W Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of February 1999 is attached.
The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements
for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts February 28, 1999 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 15,004,486 5.5
Union Bank Checking Account 488.078 3.7
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 162.000 3.7
PIMCO—Shon4erm Portfolio 18,518.258 &0
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 298,626,210 4.2
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,104 5.2
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,196.828 6.0
Petty Cash 4.400 —
TOTAL $355.002,364
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEOA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SK:Ic
\YWhWpt W GSNM]1P[nn1FNiRN�bW Wn1F�lldrc
IMM Page 2
ReportPrepared by Finance, 3/10/99, 10:14 AM
Monthly Treasurer's
District Fund Balances
$400,000,000
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,,
II Debt Service Reserves DLAIF
II Dist I I
:.... ..... ..... :.... :.... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
yam.❖.�., ,�.❖.•., ,❖.❖., .❖.❖., ,•.❖.•., .•••.•.•,�
•o.•oo. �.:.:.❖. ❖:❖:� i.❖.•.o :.:.:.:.:. •'•'•'•'•'
F ; GO Bond
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 28 February 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies (603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current MarketValue Estimate:
Mellon0 $18:518:258
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $18,565,155
Mellon $18,565,138
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.42
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $78,675
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 61%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: 0.31 0.34
3 Months: 1.13 1.08
12 Months: 5.46 4.92
Year-to-Date: 0.71 0.71
N..I..IFINANCEIII9IKOMMCUPLELIQ0199.RPT
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 28 February 1999)
Long-Term Operating Monies(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
Q��y1 $299,332,242
e11onO $298,626,210
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $301,389,682
Mellon $301,074,268
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2AI
Of Index: 2.37
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,315,624
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 16%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return (%) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: (0.82) (0.90)
3 Months: 0.10 (0.04)
12 Months: 6.39 5.99
Year-to-Date: (0.30) (0.40)
H.L.JPINANCEQIOWOZ KUAMPLEL-0U299.RPT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BySECTOR BASE[ USDA
28-FEB-1999
XB1100
4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS . .
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,668,659.00 2,668,659.00 14.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,755,236.00 3,755,236.00 20.051 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 1,383,624.67 1,383,624-.67 7.39% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 100,572.67 100,572.67 0.54% 0.00 4,670.42 4.64
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 7,908,092.34 7,900,092.34 42.23% 0.00 4,670.42 0.06
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,310,824.00 17.68% -14,441.63 210,375.00 6.35
U.S. AGENCIES 3,699,104.60 3,686,717.00 19.69% -12,387.60 178,895.00 4.85
BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,257,722.00 2,244,550.00 11.98% -13,172.00 187,625.00 8.36
INDUSTRIAL 863,753.00 059,027.00 4.59% -4,726.00 60,562.50 7.05
UTILITY - ELECTRIC 511,200.00 509,045.00 2.72% -2,155.00 40,000.00 7.86
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10,657,045.23 10,610,163.00 56.65% -46,882.23 677,457.50 6.38
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 210,014.77 210,014.77 1.121 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 210,014.77 210,014.77 1.12% 0.00 0.00 0.00
............... -------- ...=.o.. ---------- ._......_....... ..s.=.
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,775,152.34 18,728,270.11 100.00% -46,882.23 682,127.92 3.64
UCSE'U75222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
28-FEB-1999 HB1100
4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH d CASH EQUIVALENTS
RECEIVABLES 10,485,366.51 10,485,366.51 3.46% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -31,438,985.94 -31,438,985.94 -30.37% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,280,656.67 2,280,656.67 0.75% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED LAND BANK - LESS INN IYR 299,167.00 299,167.00 0.30► 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 256,149.42 256,148.42 0.08► 0.00 11,895.08 4.64
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH d CASH EQUIVALENTS -18,117,647.34 -18,117,647.34 -5.98% 0.00 11,895.08 -0.07
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 130,310,695.60 129,214,489.91 42.61% -1,096,205.69 8,201,507.42 6.35
U.S. AGENCIES 49,177,267.51 48,770,167.59 16.08% -407,099.92 3,055,424.24 6.26
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,580,469.75 16,457,403.13 5.43% -123,065.62 1,057,500.00 6.43
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,221,064.81 5,205,690.52 1.72% -15,174.29 354,594.79 6.81
FHLMC POOLS 13,272,384.18 13,152,091.45 4.34% -120,292.73 914,773.56 6.96
FHLMC MULTICLASS 6,965,452.21 7,006,329.57 2.31% 40,877.36 439,418.75 6.27
FNMA POOLS 4,253,517.19 4,253,517.19 1.40% 0.00 251,262.00 5.91
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 211,517.23 212,321.01 0.07% 803.78 13,114.07 6.18
OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,332,878.61 4,359,469.26 1.44% 26,590.65 250,487.38 5.75
BANKING d FINANCE 66,331,724.37 66,181,208.62 21.83% -150,515.75 3,948,575.09 5.97
INDUSTRIAL 15,037,689.00 14,356,493.90 4.73% -681,195.10 1,162,527.00 8.10
UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,574,475.00 2.50% 77,220.00 450,000.00 5.94
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 319,291,914.46 316,743,857.15 104.46% -2,448,057.31 20,099,264.30 6.35
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,588,422.87 4,588,422.87 1.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,588,422.87 4,588,422.87 1.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00
----e........ ........ ................. ................ .......
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 305,662,689.99 303,214,632.68 100.004 2,448,057.31 20,111,159.38 6.63
Page 1
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I
OCSF07511202 3999/02/28 RUN DATE OVO4/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS
100,572.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM .000 4.644 AAA 100.000 100,572.67 1.27
996085247 100,572.67 ,54
400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MG CORP DISC 4.766 .000 P-1 98.616 394,464.44 4.98
313396FT5 MAT OS/18/1999 3%,464.44 2.13
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MG CORP DISC 4.775 .000 P-1 98.846 3,360,771.56 42.49
313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 3,360,771.56 19.15
900,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 4.834 .000 P-1 98.805 889,962.00 11.25
34539URM6 04/21/1999 889,962.00 4.81
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 98.760 888,840.00 11.23
36959MS3 05/05/1999 8681840.00 4.80
900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.944 .000 P-1 98.873 889,857.00 11.25
02581SR78 04/07/1999 889,857.00 4.81
1,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSH DISC 5.072 .000 P-1 98.830 1,383,6M.67 17.49
313588GA7 MAT 05/25/1999 1,383,624.67 7.47
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.699 .112 7,908,092.34 IDO.OU
7,908,092.M 42.72
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 4.860 4.852 MA 99.641 3,699,104.60 34.74
3133M7EN2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DD 01/28/99 3,686,717.00 19.91
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP IST A REF MG 5.001 7.858 AA3 101.809 511,200.00 4.79
264399089 8.000% 12/01/1999 OD 11/01/94 509,045.00 2.75
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.654 Al 104.709 529,010.00 4.93
171205AT4 13.2502 10/15/1999 523,545.00 2.83
$50,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 7.050 AZ 101.062 865,753.00 8.09
718154BX4 7.1252 12/01/1999 OD IV01/92 859,027.00 4.64
900,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN 5.305 6.206 A2 100.705 909,657.00 8.54
37042M7G2 6.2507. 01/11/2000 OD 01/11/94 906,345.00 4.89
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 2
OCSF07511102 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 21.54.23
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
300,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC MTS 5.363 7.553 A2 100.950 303,930.00 2.85
073902AP3 7.6257. 09/15/2999 OD 09/21/94 302,850.00 1.64
3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.354 AAA 100.328 3,325:265.63 31.20
912827X72 06.3757. 05/15/1999 00 05/15/96 3,310,824.00 17.88
800,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN RSB00130 5.653 8.255 A3 102.362 515:125.00 4.82
89350MEP1 8.4507. O1/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 511,810.00 2.76
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.058 6.073 10,657,045.23 100.00
1016101163.00 57.30
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL 4.929 3.931 18:565:137.57 300.00
18,318:255.34 100.00
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSF07522202 1999/02/2B
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUM DATE 03/04/99
RUM TIME 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
----------------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ -----------
CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS
256,148.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NOW .000 4.644 AAA 100.00E 256,148.42 9.03
996085247 256,148.42 .08
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LM NTG CORP DISC 4.773 .000 P-1 99.722 299,167.0E 10.54
313396BB6 MAT 03/15/1999 299,167.00 .09
2,000,000.00 DU PONT BE MENGUR DISC 4.84E .000 P-1 99.093 1,981,866.67 69.SO
26354BRT1 04/27/1999 1,981,866.67 .62
300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.860 .000 P-1 99.597 298,790.00 10.53
19121EQSS 03/26/1999 296,790.00 .09
-------- ------- ----------------- -----___-
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.032 .769 2,835,972.09 100.00
2,835,972.09 .ee
FIKED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY MR? GLOBAL NT .000 5.914 A2 97.988 11992,800.00 .61
0663650M4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 2,959,760.00 .61
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTH .000 5.793 Al 100.23E 3,498,635.00 1.10
17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 3,508,190.00 1.10
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR GO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.363 Al 99.765 1,998,613.60 .62
345397SC8 FLTG NT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/98 1,995,300.00 .62
7,300,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR ATM TR 0 00177 .000 4.362 Al 99.953 6,999,748.00 2.24
345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 OD 03/30/94 71096,663.00 2.22
3,950,000.E0 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.542 A2 99.373 3,918,768.50 1.23
370425QVS FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 3,925,253.50 1.23
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL. INC SR NT .000 6.188 A3 99.998 2,999,310.00 .94
423328A26 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 OD 04/27/% 2,999,%0.00 .94
4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HIM .000 5.887 A3 100.343 41000,000.00 1.26
42333HJM3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 4,013,720.00 1.26
4,000,000.00 NODS EHOLD FIN CO HIM .000 5.989 A2 99.311 4,000,000.00 1.25
44181KIA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,972,440.00 1.24
YLOAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4
OCSF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE : 03/04/99
ORANGE CTY-LDNC TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY TO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- -
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTH SR 000570 .000 5.772 A2 99.511 999,108.90 .31
44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 OD 09/04/98 995,110.00 .31
7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES .000 5.673 AA3 100.218 7,003,710.00 2.21
61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO OV23198 7,015,260.00 2.20
4,382,697.56 STUDENT LN MXTG ASSM 1997-1 Al .000 5.746 AAA 99.470 4,332,878.61 1.37
78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,359,469.26 1.36
7,163,870.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.699 3.646 AAA 99.437 7,140,713.77 2.24
91M27US 3.6257. 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,123,537.41 2.23
10,MS,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.729 3.497 AAA 96.500 10,066,075.00 3.15
9IM272M3 3.37514 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 9,963,021.50 3.12
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 6.ON AAA 102.656 9,034,223.67 2.75
9128272G6 06.250X O1/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,725,760.00 2.73
19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL NTG ASSN HTN 4.943 6.456 AM 103.312 20,012,510.00 6.19
31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DD 03/27/97 19,629,28E.00 6.14
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 5.234 9.082 AM 122.500 6,233,393.75 1.93
912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/US/83 6,125,000.00 1.92
31,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.205 AM 102.734 32,509,817.31 10.21
912827Z54 06.3757.. 09/30/2001 OD 09/30/96 12,361,230.00 10.13
17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 7.101 MA 105.623 18,368,684.02 5.70
93282Mn 07.500X 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18,061,875.00 5.65
5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.402 6.070 AM 102.969 5,677,682.23 1.78
912827MS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 5,663,295.00 1.77
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.533 6.578 AM 103.875 8,865,156.26 2.78
112027MO 06.6257. 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 8,829,375.00 2.76
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.386 AM 126.516 6,698,250.00 2.07
91MINGO 11.875X 21/15/2003 00 10/05/83 6,578,832.00 2.06
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.388 AA3 101.756 1,543,215.00 .48
046003HYS 6.SOOX 07/15/2002 OD 07/11/97 1,526,340.00 .48
1,000,000.00 NELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.793 A3 99.259 999,730.00 .31
42333WJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 992,590.00 .31
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATIM RIM TINE 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YM AT CURRENT QUALITY HARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------
16,100,000.00 V S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.274 AAA 103.5% 16,581,067.03 5.26
9IM272VI 06.5002 05/31/2002 00 06/02/97 16,676,634.00 5.22
- 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.804 6.470 A2 101.078 2,060,739.00 .63
81240QSN6 6.5402 02/20/2003 DD OV20/97 2,026,613.90 .63
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.086 AAA 102.687 5,086,402.25 1.62
9128272U 06.2502 OV28/2002 00 OV28/97 5,134,350.00 1.61
4,230,000.00 COHORT TO MR FNMA 11TN 5.841 5.907 MA 100.556 4,253,517.19 1.34
IIFSI16M 5.%O% 03/25/2029 4,253,517.19 1.33
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.849 6.534 A2 101.468 3,073,170.00 .96
81240QJAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 00 07/09/97 3,044,040.00 .95
14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NATL IRO ASSN NTH 5.882 5.908 AAA 96.656 14,560,462.50 4.50
31364GLO9 5.710% W2.5/2008 DO 12/LS/98 14,256,760.00 4.46
6,000,000.00 HATIONSBARK CHARLOTTE N C NTH 5.882 5.852 "1 99.968 5,99fi,400.00 1.89
638SGJDE6 5.850I 04/07/2000 00 04/07/98 51998,080.00 1.88
1,028,223.15 FNLMC HULTICL HTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.993 100.125 1,026,n7.21 .32
5133T0MS 5.9002 06/15/2017 1,029,508.43 .32
1,430,184.44 CHASE HAMHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.8% AAA 100.097 1,427,223.52 .45
161614AE2 5.90D2 11/LS/2001 DO 11/LS/95 1,431,571.72 .45
2,500,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.301 AA 102.172 2,526,725.00 .79
590185KP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 _ 2,529,300.00 .79
7,500,000.00 BELLSWTX TELECOI90MICATION3 6.010 5.941 AAA 100.993 7,497,255.00 2.39
079867AOI5 6.0007. 06/15/2002 GO 06/LS/98 7,574,475.00 2.37
1,250,000.00 GENERAL NTRS ACCEP CORP MS 6.032 6.944 A2 102.602 1,283,862.50 .40
3704MF0 7.1252 05/01/2001 OD 05/01/97 1,282,525.00 .40
1,000,000.00 GENERAL WAS ACCEP CORP MM 6.046 6.585 A2 101.750 1,018,520.00 .32
37042WGKI 6.7002 04/30/2002 OD 04/25/96 1,017,500.00 .32
6,250,000.00 COIMIT TO PUR GNMA SF HTG 6.060 6.184 AAA 97.031 6,195,312.50 1.91
OIN060635 6.000Y. 03/25/2029 6,064,437.50 1.90
211,517.24 FIFTH THIRD M AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.177 AAA 100.380 211,517.23 .06
31677EAA4 6.2002 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 212,321.02 .07
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 6
OMF07522202 1999/02/28 RUN DATE 03/04/9,
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE HARKEY VALUE X TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________
2,500,000.00 LEMAN BROS HLBGS MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.412 BAA1 99.816 2,509,175.00 .78
5ZS17PLMl 6.400Y. 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 2,495,400.00 .78
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL ITC ASSN HTN 6.291 6.105 AAA 102.047 4,488,705.00 1."
31364CRV5 6.2307. 03/02/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,592,115.00 1.44
3,933,484.75 FKLHC HULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.280 AAA 100.697 3,937,787.00 1.25
313ME95 6.3247. 08/25/2032 31960,901.14 1.24
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC 6.330 6.659 A2 101.370 21031,960.00 .64
07390ZAH1 6.750% 04/15/2003 2,027,400.00 .63
5,000,000.00 LEM AN BROS HLOGS HTN 000196 6.364 6.646 BAAI 100.062 51039,450.00 1.57
52517PJ 6.650% 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 51003,100.00 1.57
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.668 AZ 101.228 1,317,619.35 .41
07390UWO 6.750% 05/01/2001 BD 04/26/96 1,321,025.40 .41
10,500,000.00 COHNIT TO MR GMHA SF HTC 6.478 6.567 AAA 98.981 10,385,156.25 3.28
DIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2029 10,392,965.63 3.25
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.449 AM 100.796 2,000,888.00 .63
3133TOPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 2101S1920.00 .63
2,259,153.95 FHLMC HULTICLASS CTF SIR 1620Z 6.563 6.452 AAA 92.988 21103,014.01 .66
3133T37A4 6.000% 12/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 2,100,732.59 .66
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN HTH 6.577 6.470 AAA 102.391 8,012,576.00 2.58
31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 UD 04/18/96 8,191,280.00 2.56
9,000,000.00 PHILIP NORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.965 A2 303.176 9,903,780.00 2.93
71SIS4802 9.25UX 02/IS/2000 9,285,840.00 2.91
13,068,193.65 FNLHC CROUP RCS-0476 6.626 6.955 AAA 100.642 13,272,384.18 4.15
31280DQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 OD 02/01/98 13,152,091.45 4.12
3,000,000.00 G N A C MED TERM MTS 6.660 8.415 A2 102.492 3,227,070.00 .97
37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 OD 1/10/95 3,074,760.00 .96
3,048,113.62 DNA II POOL 8080088M 6.705 6.767 AAA 101.594 3,114,791.12 .97
36225CC20 6.875Y. 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 31096,700.55 .97
2,071,956.90 CIDIA I1 POOL $0080023 6.869 6.876 MA 101.797 2,106,273.69 .66
36225CAZ9 7.0007. IV20/2026 DD 12/01/96 2,109,189.97 .66
YLDAIUL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7
OCSF07522202 1999/02/20 RUN DATE 03/04/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.54.23
PAR VALUE YM AT WRRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ _ ............ ---------- -
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 0.367 AAA 157.984 41029,030.33 1.24
9128100A 13.2507. 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 3,949,600.00 1.24
________ -------
TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 4.166 6.106 519,193,914.K 100.00
u6,74S,0q.13 99.12
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 4.166 6.102 322,027,006.5E 100.00
319,579,829.N 100.00
V�ZWVVLUV MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASH USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TH100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-FEB-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000
313384SK4 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000
CM HAT 02/03/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-FEB-1999 -0.85 -0.85 0.000000
313384BK4 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC ----------- -0.85 0.00 0.000000
CW HAT 02/03/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR SUB-ADV ADMINISTRATION FEE
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES O1-FEB-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
313396SH5 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW HAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH i CASH EQUIVALENTS
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 -298,790.00 99.596666
19123EQS5 03/26/1999 24-FEB-1999 298,790.00 298,790.00 99.596666
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 -298,790.00 99.596666
19121EQSS 03/26/1999 24-FEB-1999 -298,790.00 0.00 99.596666
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-FEB-1999 -1,981,866.67 -1,981,866.67 99.093333
26354BRT1 04/27/1999 19-FEB-1999 1,981,066.67 1,901,066.67 99.093333
B GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC is-FEB-1999 -1,981,866.67 -1,981,866.67 99.093333
26354BRT1 04/27/1999 18-FEB-1999 -1,981,666.67 0.00 99.093333
PC GOLD14AN SACHS i CO, NY 18-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 1
WF 11\VJl
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TMIOO
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 0.00 99.205000
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 04-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.DDD000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333
313396DB6 MAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 299,167.00 299,167.00 99.722333
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333
313396DB6 HAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 0.00 99.722333
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.5Q 98.846222
313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 3,360,771.56 3,360,771.56 96.946222
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 98.846222
313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 0.00 98.846222
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110
313396FT5 HAT 05/10/1999 01-FEB-1999 394,464.44 394,464.44 98.616110
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIHCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110
313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 0.00 98.616110
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Paq,. 2
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -vLOCAL/BASE BASE- USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FES-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 0.00 99.205000
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 04-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333
313396DB6 HAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 299,167.00 299,167.00 99.722333
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 -299,167.00 99.722333
313396DB6 MAT 03/15/1999 22-FEB-1999 -299,167.00 0.00 99.722333
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 98.846222
313396FDO HAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 3,360,771.56 3,360,771.56 98.846222
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMOO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,771.56 -3,360,771.56 99.046222
313396FDO MAT 05/04/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,360,171.56 0.00 99.846222
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
O.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MSG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110
313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 01-FEB-1999 394,464.44 394,464.44 98.616110
B GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 -394,464.44 98.616110
313396FT5 MAT 05/18/1999 01-FEB-1999 -394,464.44 0.00 98.616110
FC GOLDMAN SACHS L CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 2
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -888,940.00 -888,840.00 98.760000
36959JS53 05/05/1999 01-FEB-1999 888,840.00 888,840.00 98.760000
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 -889,940.00 -888,840.00 98.760000
36959JS53 05/05/1999 01-FEB-1999 -898,840.00 0.00 98.760000
PC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC O1-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663888
74271SPSO 02/26/1999 01-FEB-1999 2,292,269.45 2,292,269.45 99.663888
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC O1-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663888
742719PSO 02/26/1999 01-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 0.00 99.663886
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
16,665.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 -16,665.50 1.000000
996085247 01-FEB-1999 16,665.50 16,665.50 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
16,665.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 -16,665.50 1.000000
996085247 01-FEB-1999 -16,665.50 0.00 1.000000
PC O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
377.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 -377.01 1.000000
996085247 02-FEB-1999 377.01 377.01 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
377.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 -377.01 1.000000
996085247 02-FEB-1999 -377.01 0.00 1.000000
PC 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 3
,
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS' -J LOCAL/BASE BASS! USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TMIOD
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
475,682.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 -475,692.74 1.000000
996085247 02-FEB-1999 475,682.74 475,682.74 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
475,682.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 -475,682.74 1.000000
996085247 02-FEB-1999 -475,682.74 0.00 1.000000
FC 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
239,228.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 -239,228.44 1.000000
996085247 05-FEB-1999 239,228.44 239,228.44 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
239,228.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 -239,228.44 1.000000
996085247 05-FEB-1999 -239,228.44 0.00 1.000000
FC 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
27,814.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 -27,914.25 1.000000
996085247 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 27,814.25 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
27,814.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 -27,814.25 1.000000
996085247 11-FEB-1999 -27,814.25 0.00 1.000000
FC 11-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,206,306.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 -2,206,306.40 1.000000
996085247 16-FEB-1999 2,206,306.40 2,206,306.40 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,206,306.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 -2,206,306.40 1.000000
996085247 16-FEB-1999 -2,206,306.40 0.00 1.000000
Page 4
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
48,517.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-FEB-1999 -48,517.78 -48,517.78 1.000000
996085247 17-FEB-1999 48,517.78 48,517.78 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
48,517.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-FEB-1999 -40,517.78 -48,517.78 1.000000
996085247 17-FEB-1999 -48,517.78 0.00 1.000000
FC 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
62,283.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 -62,283.27 1.000000
996095247 22-FEB-1999 62,283.27 62,283.27 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
62,283.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 -62,283.27 1.000000
996085247 22-FEB-1999 -62,283.27 0.00 1.000000
PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,160.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 -12,160.95 1.000000
996085247 23-FEB-1999 12,160.95 12,160.95 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,160.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 -12,160,95 1.000000
9960B5247 23-FEB-1999 -12,160.95 0.00 1.000000
PC 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 -10,633,33 1.000000
996085247 25-FEB-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 -10,833.33 1.000000
Paq r. 5
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS ,-LOCAL/BASE BASet USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 26-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS SASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
996085247 25-FEB-1999 -10,833.33 0.00 1.000000
FC 25-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
16,367.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 -16,367.48 1.000000
996085247 26-FEB-1999 16,367.48 16,367.48 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
16,367.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 -16,367.48 1.000000
996085247 26-FEB-1999 -16,367.48 0.00 1.000000
FC 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
149,314.33 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-FEB-1999 -149,314.33 -149,314.33 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 16-FEB-1999 149,314.33 149,314.33 1.000000
B 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
94,990.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 23-FEB-1999 -94,990.00 -94,990.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 23-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 1.000000
B 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.632812
OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,264,550.75 98.632812
SC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750
O1N060627 6.0001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,154,296.68 -6,154,296.8E 98.468750
BC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1990 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000
PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 6
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USE,
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
------------------------------------------------______---__--- __________________ ____________________ __________________
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000
FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-DEC-1998 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 0.00 101.000000
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 6,058,125.00 6,059,125.00 100.968750
OIN062623 6.5001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750
01N062623 6.5001 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNHA SF MTG 25-FEB-1999 -10,385,156.25 -10,385,156.25 98.906250
OIN062656 6.5001 05/15/2029 24-MAY-1999 10,385,156.25 10,385,156.25 98.906250
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.88 99.453125
02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -1,491,796.88 0.00 99.453125
PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLNC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 1,491,796.88 1,491,796.08 99.453125
02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN=1999 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.98 99.453125
BC GREENWICH CAP MKTS, MEN YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 7
1lsW001UU LLW. 1ttUJ1
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD '
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 1,491,796.88 1,491,796.88 99.453125
02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 1,491,796.88 0.00 99.453125
FCC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500
02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -4,699,531.25 0.00 98.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 . 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 98.937500
02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 98.937500
02R000613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 4,699,531.25 0.00 98.937500
FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 04-FEB-1999 -303,930.00 -303,930.06 101.310000
073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 303,930.00 303,930.00 101.310000
B MESIRON 4 COMPANY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC NTS 04-FEB-1999 -9,150.00 -9,150.00 101.310000
073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DD 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 101.310000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 BEAR STEARN COS INC HIS 04-FEB-1999 -313,080.00 -313,080.00 101.310000
073902AP3 7.625% 09/15/1999 DO 09/21/94 09-FEB-1999 -313,080.00 0.00 101.310000
PC MESIRON i COMPANY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500
1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500
PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Pagn 9
C800C-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-ROV-1998 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500
1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500
BC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500
11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500
FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,075.00 100.843750
1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,675.00 0.00 100.843750
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1990 2,016,975.00 2,016,875.00 100.843750
11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750
SC GOLDHAM SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 2,016,875.00 2,016,075.00 100.843750
1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,016,875.00 0.00 100.843750
FCC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIKCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNKA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000
11F011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000
B GOLDMAN SACHS c CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 2,001,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000
11F0I1628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000
BC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -2,237,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.328125
11F011628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.328125
Page 9
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD .
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TH100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
B BEAR STEARNS i CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 2,231,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.326125
IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,231,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.320125
BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA 11TH 04-FEB-1999 -2,010,625,00 -2,010,625.00 100.531250
IIF0I1636 5.940% 03/25/2029 24-MAR-1999 2,010,625.00 2,010,625.00 100.531250
B GOLDMAN SACHS f CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH 11-FEB-1999 -2,242,892.19 -2,242,092.19 100.578125
IIF0I1636 5.940% 03/25/2029 24-MAR-1999 2,242,892.19 2,242,092.19 100.578125
B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 171,907.15 171,907.15 90.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 376.47 376.47 98.937500
31283HETI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-173,753.20 FHLNC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 172,283.62 172,283.62 99.937500
31283KBTI 6.0001 06/01/2020 DO 06/01/90 14-JAN-1999 172,283.62 0.00 98.937500
FCC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1990 999,268.66 999,268.66 99.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500
BC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 19-OCT-1990 2,108.33 2,198.33 98.937500
Page 10
.amvovaw MGLLVN 'rKUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 96.937500
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP YGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 1,001,456.99 1,001,456.99 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.0001 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500
FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736.333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 728,510.14 728,510.14 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
I8C - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 730,105.53 730,105.53 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 730,105.53 0.00 98.937500
FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2D28 DD O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 728,510.14 99.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY -- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
.LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP BGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 8GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -730,105.53 -730,105.53 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -730,105.53 0.00 98.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
1'a9rt 11
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS' -yLOCAWBASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN ]ASS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE SARIS/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP YGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/90 14-JAN-1999 171,907.15 171,907.15 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -376.47 -376.47 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD O6/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
tB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,283.62 -172,203.62 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -172,283.62 0.00 98.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 999,268.66 999,268.66 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -2,188.33 -2,108.33 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
1,009,999.91 FHLNC GROUP 4GO-0950 19-OCT-1996 1,001,456.99 -1,001,456.99 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -3,073,170.00 -3,073,170.00 102.439000
812400JAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 3,073,170.00 3,073,170.00 102.439000
B GOLD14AN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PI14CO
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -552.50 -552.50 102.439000
81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 102.439000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 12
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS`-JLOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 10-FEB-1999 -3,073,722.50 -3,073,722.50 102.439000
812400JAI 6.6301 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 16-FEB-1999 -3,073,722.50 0.00 102.439000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,276,562.50 -5,276,562.50 105.531250
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 5,276,562.50 5,276,562.50 105.531250
B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -92,420.58 -92,420.58 105.531250
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.531250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 5,276,562.50 5,276,562.50 105.531250
912B272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 -5,276,562.50 -5,276,562.50 105.531250
BC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 92,420.58 92,420.58 105.531250
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.531250
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,DDO,ODD.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,251,953.13 -5,251,953.13 105.039062
9128272SO 06.6254 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 5,251,953.13 5,251,953.13 105.039062
B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -92,420.58 -92,420.58 105.039062
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 105.039062
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-FEB-1999 -5,344,373.71 -5,344,373.71 105.039062
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 09-FEB-1999 -5,344,373.71 0.00 105.039062
FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 13
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS --LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -3,111,562.50 -3,111,562.50 103.719750
9120273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 3,111,562.50 3,111,562.50 103.718750
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -88,052.49 -80,052.49 103.718750
9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 103.710750
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1999 -3,199,614.99 -3,199,614.99 103.718750
9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 17-FEB-1999 -3,199,614.99 0.00 103.718750
FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1996 2,493,950.00 2,493,950.00 100.562500
999ACN396 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,493,950.00 -2,493,950.00 100.562500
BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 2,493,950.00 2,493,950.00 100.562500
999ACN396 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,493,950.00 0.00 100.562500
FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PAY UPS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,239.64 FHL4C MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 -11,239.64 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 11,239.64 11,239.64 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,239.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 -11,239.64 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 -11,239.64 0.00 100.000000
FC 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
Page 14
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556
02600KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 -95.00 -95.00 99.497556
0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAM-1999 -1,890,548.56 -1,890,548.56 99.497556
02680KQ50 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556
FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556
0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556
S LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 95.00 95.00 99.497556
0268OK050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 1,890,548.56 99.497556
02680KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556
PC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,885,429.11 2,885,429.12 99.497555
02680KOSO 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 -2,885,429.11 -2,885,429.11 99.497555
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 5,194.22 5,194.22 99.497555
0268OK050 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497555
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 15
n
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 26-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,890,623.33 2,890,623.33 99.497555
02680KQ50 03/05/1999 09-FEB-1999 2,890,623.33 0.00 99.497555
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 1,983,075.56 1,983,075.56 99.153778
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 -1,983,075.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153779
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 7,016.66 7,016.66 99.153778
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.153778
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 1,990,092.22 1,990,092.22 99.153778
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 17-FEB-1999 2,990,092.22 0.00 99.153778
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/HONEY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 99.205000
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 481.50 481.50 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.205000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 17-FEB-1999 298,096.50 298,096.50 99.205000
26354BR53 04/05/1999 17-FEB-1999 298,096.50 0.00 99.205000
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 3,070,506.67 3,078,506.67 99.306667
34539UQK1 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 -3,070,506.67 -3,078,506.67 99.306667
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 16
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 8,519.83 8,519.83 99.306667
34539UQKI 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.306667
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-FEB-1999 3,O87,026.50 3,087,026.50 99.306667
34539UQK1 03/19/1999 16-FEB-1999 3,087,026.50 0.00 99.306667
PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 794,453.33 794,453.33 99.306666
34539UQKI 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 -794,453.33 -794,453.33 99.306666
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 2,306.67 2,306.67 99.306666
34539UQK1 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.306666
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 17-FEB-1999 796,760.00 796,760.00 99.306666
34539UOKI 03/19/1999 17-FEB-1999 796,760.00 0.00 99.306666
PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 190,022.00 198,022.00 99.011000
36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 -198,022.00 -198,022.00 99.011000
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 1,950.94 1,950.94 99.011000
36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.011000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC O1-FEB-1999 199,972.94 199,972.94 99.011000
36959JP23 02/02/1999 01-FEB-1999 199,972.94 0.00 99.011000
Page 17
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD"
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,292,269.45 2,292,269.45 99.663089
74271SPS8 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 -2,292,269.45 -2,292,269.45 99.663809
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,473.77 2,473.77 99.663889
74271SPSO 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 99.663889
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,300,000.00 PROCTER a GAMBLE DISC 09-FEB-1999 2,294,743.22 2,294,743.22 99.663889
74272SPSB 02/26/1999 09-FEB-1999 2,294,743.22 0.00 99.663889
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-297,615.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 1.000000
996085247 04-FEB-1999 -297,615.00 -297,615.00 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-297,615.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 297,615.00 1.000000
996085247 04-FEB-1999 297,615.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 04-FEB-1999 0,00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-313,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-FEB-1999 313,090.00 313,080.00 1.000000
996085247 09-FEB-1999 -313,000.00 -313,080.00 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-313,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-FEB-1999 313,080.00 313,080.00 1.000000
996005247 09-FEB-1999 313,080.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-159,007.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MrMT "'-FF.R-11'�q 199,007.16 159,007.16 1.000000
IN
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -JLOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORA GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
996085247 09-FEB-1999 -159,007.16 -159,007.16 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-159,007.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGHT 09-FEB-1999 159,007.16 159,007.16 1.000000
996085247 09-FEB-1999 159,007.16 0.00 1.000000
PC 09-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,926,266.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 1,926,266.47 1.000000
996085247 19-FEB-1999 -1,926,266.47 -1,926,266.47 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,926,266,47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 1,926,266.47 1.000000
996085247 19-FEB-1999 1,926,266.47 0.00 1.000000
FC 19-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-203,800.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 203,900.00 1.000000
996005247 24-FEB-1999 -203,800.00 -203,900.00 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-203,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 203,800.00 1.000000
996085247 24-FEB-1999 203,800.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-761.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 761.67 761.67 1.000000
996085247 26-FEB-1999 -761.67 -761.67 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-761.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FEB-1999 761.67 761.67 1.000000
996085247 26-FEB-1999 761.67 0.00 1.000000
PC 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 19
_ sac Suva ,nuai
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-195,749.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-JAN-1999 195,749.00 195,749.00 100.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 18-JAN-1999 -195,749.00 -195,749.00 100.000000
S 18-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-149,314.33 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-FEB-1999 149,314.33 149,314.33 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 17-FEB-1999 -149,314.33 -149,314.33 1.000000
S 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-94,990.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 24-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 24-FEB-1999 -94,990.00 -94,990.00 1.000000
S 24-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875
OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.546875
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,371.06 -5,371.66 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 61159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875
O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 0.00 98.546975
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,203,125.00 6,203,125.00 99.250000
01N060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,203,125.00 0.00 99.250000
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.75 -6,064,218.75 101.070313
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.070313
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -4,218.75 -4,218.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.75 -6,064,218.75 101.070313
OIN062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,064,219.75 0.00 101.070313
FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 20
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,549,164.06 -4,548,164.06 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.070312
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -3,164.06 -3,164.06 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,540,164.06 -4,548,164.06 101.070312
OIN062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312
FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312
O1H062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.06 3,164.06 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,210.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070313
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218,75 4,218.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF NTG O6-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAM-1999 6,064,218.75 0.00 101.070313
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,068,671.86 6,068,671.86 101.144531
OIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,068,671.86 0.00 101.144531
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 4,551,503.90 4,551,503.90 101.144531
01N062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 4,551,503.90 0.00 201.144531
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 21
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LDCAL/BASE BASE: USD =
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 6,142,578.13 6,142,578.13 98.281250
02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 6,142,578.13 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 -6,142,578.13 -6,142,578.13 98.281250
02R060613 6.0004 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 6,191,328.13 6,191,328.13 98.281250
SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 40,750.00 48,750.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 -6,142,578.13 -6,142,578.13 9B.281250
02R060613 6.0001 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -6,142,578.13 0.00 98.281250
FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,012,343.76 2,012,343.76 100.617100
1IF011628 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,164.43 -2,007,164.43 100.617180
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 5,179.33 5,179.33 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 -2,012,343.76 -2,012,343.76 100.617188
1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,164.43 2,007,164.43 100.617108
SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,179.33 -5,179.33 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,012,343.76 2,012,343.76 100.617188
IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,007,005.76 -2,007,005.76 100.617188
S ----------- 5,338.00 5,338.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-FEB-1999 2,244,634.38 2,244,634.38 100.656250
11F011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,237,811.43 -2,237,811.43 100.656250
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 6,822.95 6,022.95 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 11-FEB-1999 2,244,634.39 2,244,634.38 100.656250
IIF0I1620 6.1501 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 -2,237,756.65 -2,237,756.65 100.656250
Page 22
L... .lv. MLLLVN anua'r
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 6,877.73 6,977.73 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 21-FEB-1999 -2,244,634.30 -2,244,634 .38 100.656250
1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,756.65 2,237,756.65 100.656250
SC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -6,877.73 -6,877.73 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -723,677.95 -723,677.95 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 728,510.14 98.201250
SC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- 4,832.19 4,832.19 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 -725,273.34 -725,273.34 98.281250
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -725,273.34 0.00 99.281250
FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 170,766.90 170,766.90 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -171,907.15 -171,907.15 98.281250
5 GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -1,140.25 -1,140.25 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 376.47 376.47 98.281250
31283MB71 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-173,753.20 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 171,143.37 171,143.37 98.281250
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 171,143.37 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 00, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP $GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 723,677.95 723,677.95 98.291250
Page 23
e w oo MRLWN TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAWBASE BASE: USD .
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
RASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2020 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 90.291250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -4,832.19 -4,932.19 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.281250
31283HBTI 6.0004 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 725,273.34 725,273.34 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 725,273.34 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 992,640.54 992,640.54 98.281250
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -6,628.12 -6,620.12 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-ROV-1998 2,188.33 2,188.33 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 98.282250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0950 17-NOV-1998 994,020.07 994,628.87 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 994,828.87 0.00 90.281250
PC GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -4,693,531.17 -4,693,531.17 99.093750
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 4,736,455.25 4,736,455.25 99.093750
SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SN ----------- 42,924.08 42,924.08 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIHCO
4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -37,307.41 -37,387.41 99.093750
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1999 0.00 0.00 99.093750
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
Page 24
UGSGuuuluu MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 -4,730,918.58 -4,730,91B.58 99.093750
78442GRA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 -4,730,918.58 0.00 99.093750
FCC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 4,693,531.17 4,693,531.17 99.093751
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 -4,736,455.25 -4,736,455.25 99.093751
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- -42,924.08 -42,924.08 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 34,732.49 34,732.49 99.093751
78442GRA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.093751
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 16-DEC-1998 4,728,263.66 4,728,263.66 99.093751
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 OD 06/18/98 17-DEC-1998 4,728,263.66 0.00 99.093751
PC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-FEB-1999 141,586.46 141,586.46 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 -141,293.33 -141,293.33 100.000000
PD ----------- 293.13 293.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-FEB-1999 141,506.46 141,586.46 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 141,586.46 0.00 100.000000
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-FEB-1999 991,138.21 991,138.21 100.000000
3128DD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 -1,006,624.74 -1,006,624.74 100.000000
PD ----------- -15,486.53 -15,486.53 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP IGS-0476 01-FEB-1999 991,138.21 991,13B.21 100.000000
3120DD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 991,136.21 0.00 100.000000
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 25
MELLUN 1MUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASL: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
65,823.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1998 -65,923.00 -65,823.00 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 65,994.99 65,894.99 100.000000
PDC ----------- 71.99 71.99 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
07,549.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-JAN-1999 -97,549.50 -87,549.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 97,645.26 87,645.26 100.000000
POD ----------- 95.76 95.76 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-07,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JAN-1999 87,549.60 87,549.60 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324► 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 -87,645.36 -87,645.36 100.000000
PD ----------- -95.76 -95.76 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-87,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JAN-1999 87,549.60 87,549.60 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 09/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 87,549.60 0.00 100.000000
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-73,140.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-FEB-1999 73,140.00 73,140.00 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-FEB-1999 -73,220.00 -73,220.00 100.000000
PD ----------- -80.00 -00.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-FEB-1999 46,311.45 46,311.45 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 -46,246.32 -46,246.32 100.000000
PD ----------- 65.13 65.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-FEB-1999 46,311.45 46,311.45 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 46,311.45 0.00 100.000000
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 17,473.32 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 -17,473.32 -17,473.32 100.000000
Page 26
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS`-J LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 17,473.32 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 17,473.32 0.00 100.000000
PC 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-103,882.75 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 103,882.75 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.0001 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 -105,603.31 - -105,603.31 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,720.56 -1,720.56 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-103,882.75 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 103,802.75 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 103,882.75 0.00 100.000000
PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,796.26 GN14A II POOL 4080088M O1-FEB-1999 160,796.26 160,796.26 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 -164,313.68 -164,313.68 100.000000
PD ----------- -3,517.42 -3,517.42 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
160,796.26 GNMA II POOL 1080088H O1-FEB-1999 -160,796.26 -160,796.26 100.000000
3622SOC20 6.875t 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 164,313.68 164,313.68 100.000000
PDC ----------- 3,517.42 3,517.42 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,792.15 GNMA II POOL tOB0088M 01-FEB-1999 160,792.15 160,792.15 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-FEB-1999 -164,309.48 -164,309.48 100.000000
PD ----------- -3,517.33 -3,517.33 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-160,792.15 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-FEB-1999 160,792.15 160,792.15 100.000000
36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 160,792.15 0.00 100.000000
PC 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
Page 27
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
-1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 26-FEB-1999 1,378,440.00 1,378,440.00 100.000000
313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 26-FEB-1999 -1,378,440.00 -1,378,440.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
-1,100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC O1-FEB-1999 1,089,412.50 1,089,412.50 100.000000
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 01-FEB-1999 -1,089,412.50 -1,089,412.50 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
-3,600.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN DISC 05-FEB-1999 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 100,000000
313588BM6 HAT 02/05/1999 05-FEB-1999 -3,554,227.00 -3,554,227.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
INTEREST
U.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 27,814.25 0.000000
066365DN4 FLTG AT 05/21/2003 DO 05/11/98 11-FEB-1999 27,814.25 0.00 0.000000
IT 11-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
141,586.46 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 16-FEB-1999 7,727.87 7,727.87 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-FEB-1999 7,727.87 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 17-FEB-1999 13,869.72 13,869.72 0.000000
171200E80 FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 15-FEB-1999 13, 869.72 0.00 0.000000
IT 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
991,138.21 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 16-FEB-1999 82,012.77 82,012.77 0.000000
3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-FEB-1999 82,012.77 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
87,549.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-FEB-1999 21,425.80 21,425.80 0.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 21,425.80 0.00 0.000000
Page 28
L-MLLwil l nuo l
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN ]ASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF Ill A6 25-FEB-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000
3133TDPV2 6.5001 09/25/201B 25-JAN-1999 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 25-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,311.45 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 26-FEB-1999 5,283.13 5,283.13 0.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-FEB-1999 5,283.13 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,239.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 17-FEB-1999 11,239.64 11,239.64 0.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-FEB-1999 11,239.64 0.00 0.000000
IT 17-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 26-FEB-1999 21,560.00 21,560.00 0.000000
313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 26-FEB-1999 21,560.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 01-FEB-1999 10,587.50 10,587.50 0.000000
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 01-FEB-1999 10,587.50 0.00 0.000000
IT Dl-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 05-FEB-1999 45,773.00 45,773.00 0.000000
313588BM6 MAT 02/05/1999 05-FEB-1999 45,773.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 05-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-JAN-1999 -12,776.52 -12,776.52 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -12,776.52 Q.00 0.000000
ITC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,473.32 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 11 -1'F:P-J4lq 1, 183. 12 1,183.12 0.000000
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ,
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURA GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1999 1,183.12 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
103,882.75 GNMA II POOL #0080023 22-FEB-1999 11,105.85 11,105.85 0.000000
36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1999 11,105.05 0.00 0.000000
IT 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
160,792.15 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 22-FEB-1999 18,384.36 18,384.36 0.000000
36225CC20 6.8754 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1999 18,384.36 0.00 0.000000
IT 22-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 19-FEB-1999 55,600.20 55,600.20 0.000000
370425QV5 FLTG RT 09/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 18-FEB-1999 55,600.20 D.00 0.000000
IT 29-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400570 02-FEB-1999 13,572.60 13,572.60 0.000000
44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/90 02-FEB-1999 13,572.60 0.00 0.000000
IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
O.DD
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 400196 16-FBB-1999 166,250.00 166,250.00 0.000000
52517PJD4 6.650% 11/00/2000 DO 11/08/96 15-FEB-1999 166,250.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 16-FEB-1999 80,000.00 00,000.00 0.000000
52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 15-FEB-1999 80,000.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN WITTER SR NOTES 23-FEB-1999 94,990.00 94,990.00 0.000000
61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 26-NOV-1998 94,990.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
Page 30
OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-FEB-1999 - 29-FEB-1999 TM1D0
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-FEB-1999 416,250.00 416,250.00 0.000000
718154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 15-FEB-1999 416,250.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-FEB-1999 218,125.00 278,125.00 0.000000
912810DE5 11.125% O9/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 15-FEB-1999 278,125.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O1-FEB-1999 265,625.00 265,625.00 0.000000
9128272G6 06.2501 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 31-JAN-1999 265,625.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 26-FEB-1999 -761.66 -761.66 0.000000
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 26-FEB-1999 -761.66 O.DO 0.000000
CM AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM PUS INT ADJ 26-FEB-1999 -7.85 -7.85 0.000000
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 26-FEB-1999 -7.85 0.00 0.000000
CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 26-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 378.71 378.71 0.000000
996085247 01-FEB-1999 370.71 0.00 0.000000
IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-FEB-1999 3,091.10 3,091.10 0.000000
996085247 01-FEB-1999 3,091.10 0.00 0.000000
IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT O1-FEB-1999 10.73 10,73 0.000000
996087094 VAR AT DO O6/26/1997 01-FEB-1999 10.73 0.00 0.000000
IT O1-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 31
.auUt-Gun5UL1UA'1'EU POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-FEB-1999 - 28-FES-1999 TN100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
Page 32
i
FAHR COMMITTEE MetlngO"` Toea"°
3/10ry5 3R493
AGENDA REPORT 10r 13 Mm
Ca) ' 7
1.3 p /,}
Orange County Sanitation Dis rid
FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
SUBJECT: UTILITY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUDITING SERVICES
(FAHR99-15)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1)Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Makesense, Inc., for
utility and telecommunications auditing services; and 2) Approve such services
on a contingency fee basis that are calculated as: a) a not-to-exceed 50%fee for
all recovered overcharges, and b) the equivalent of twelve (12) months savings
for all implemented cost reduction strategies.
SUMMARY
The District has budgeted approximately $3.7 million in FY 98/99 for utility
services that include telecommunications, water, gas and electric. The fees and
charges associated with utility billings can be extremely complex. As a result, the
District, like most organizations, is likely paying more than necessary for utility
services as we are not fully aware of alternate fee structures, optional services,
taxes, tariffs, etc., which could prove beneficial if implemented. In addition, utility
company billing practices are fallible and these companies may invoice
incorrectly due to various circumstances. Utility overcharges, resulting from both
utility billing errors and less than ideal payment plans/structures, can be mitigated
upon identification. Upon identification, many overcharged rates/fees can be
recouped and re-structured resulting in refunds as well as future cost savings.
In December 1998, the District solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Utility
Billing Audit. Proposals received were reviewed and ranked by a Staff
Committee based on the proposed scope of work and cost of services. Based
upon the contents of each proposal and reference checks, the Committee
unanimously agreed that Makesense, Inc. had the most thorough scope of work
while being the lowest bidder. Staff recommends a PSA be awarded to
Makesense, Inc. for utility and telecommunications auditing services.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Makesense, Inc. operates on a contingency fee basis. The proposed fees for
services are:
caE.ar,wm.,s ur.,,m.a
aww.a ,Rvs Page 1
t
• Recovery Fee: Makesense, Inc. will invoice OCSD for 50% of any
overcharges returned to OCSD as a result of the audit. Upon OCSD's receipt
of each recovery, Makesense, Inc. will invoice for 50% of the recovery.
Although the recovery fee was deemed acceptable, the FAHR Committee
directed staff to further negotiate this fee and attempt to reduce the
percentage of recovery. Staff is currently in negotiations and as a result a
not-to-exceed 50% recovery fee is recommended.
• Cost Reduction Fee: Makesense, Inc. will invoice for the difference in
monthly charges on each account where a cost reduction strategy was
implemented based on recommendations. Cost reduction fees are based on
one year's worth of identified utility savings.
There is no net cost associated with the consultant services related to recovery
of overcharges; there will be net revenue of an unknown amount. Cost reduction
services will be paid back through reduced rates/fees in approximately twelve
(12) months after the close of the contract. These reduced fees will result in net
utility savings to the District beginning in month thirteen (13).
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
This item has not been budgeted in the FY 98/99 budget. The project will run
into FY 99/00 where, due to project scheduling, the vast majority of consultant
fees (if any) will be paid. Because it is unknown if these services will result in a
short-term net benefit versus a short-term cost, sufficient funds will be added to
the General Manager's Professional Services line-item in FY 99/00 to cover any
Cost Reduction Fees.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In September 1998, the General Manager sought guidance from Creative Power
Management, a District power consultant, to assess whether utility billing audits
were viable, cost-effective services. Creative Power Management indicated
support for such services.
In December 1998, six(6) RFP's were distributed to various national firms with
expertise in utility billing auditing. Two proposals were received. These
proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house Staff Committee. Based on
ciomruesai s uwr wnaec
Page 2
"a
the proposed scope of work and price, staff unanimously agreed that
Makesense, Inc. provided the best service at the most reasonable price.
As the RFP placed limitations on the proposals' length, additional information
was sought from Makesense, Inc. regarding precisely how the firm intended to
bill for services and under what circumstances. The attached Letter of
Clarification further details the proposed fees for services.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Do not award PSA.
2) Do not authorize PSA and attempt to utilize in-house staff to conduct audit.
This option is likely not cost-effective as in-house staff do not have the
expertise of professional utility billing auditors.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not Applicable,
ATTACHMENTS
1) Letter of Clarification
GM
c ro�xux®n5 ueiq wnaa
Page 3
MAKESENSE, INC.
395 Rolling Hills Drive, Conroe, Texas 77304
phone: 409.856.2405 e fax 409.856.5199
internal: http:/twvw.makesense-inc.com
•
February 25, 1999
Greg Mathews, Asst. to the GM
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 9270M127
RE LETTEROF CLARIFICATION
Greg:
Per your request, the following aspects regarding the services we normally provide are explained more
fully.
Fee Structure
Recovery Fee: MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice OCSD for 50% of any overcharges retumed to OCSD as
a result of our audit Those recoveries will normally be a credit to the account on which the error occurred.
If the account is closed, the recovery could be credited on any other existing account or returned as a
check payable to OCSD. Upon OCSD's receipt of each recovery, MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice for
50%. In the event that a permanent cost reduction is associated with the recovery, MAKESENSE, INC.
will include the cost reduction fee on the same invoice. If the cost reduction fee exceeds 50% of the
recovery, the balance of the cost reduction fee will be invoiced at the dose of the audit where "tine close
of the audit'is defined as the date of the Final Audit Report
Cost Reduction Fee: MAKESENSE, INC. will invoice for the difference in monthly charges on each
account where a cost reduction was implemented by, or at the recommendation of, MAKESENSE, INC.
A cost reduction is a realized net lower monthly cost as the result of implementing a change in service
type, service rate, service provider, service usage or any combination thereof. Cost reduction fees are 12
times the difference between the monthly costs before the audit and the costs after the audit, based either
on the average usage experienced in the 12 months prior to implementation of the cost reduction or on
actual monthly usage for the 12 months following implementation.
However if a cost reduction opportunity is proposed by MAKESENSE, INC., and OCSD refuses to
implement or allow MAKESENSE, INC. to implement the changes necessary to achieve the cost
reduction, OCSD is under no obligation to pay the associated cost reduction fee, except that if the cost
reduction is later implemented within the 12 months follovng the dose of the audit MAKESENSE, INC.
will than be due the normal cost reduction fee as 'rf the change had been implemented when proposed.
OCSD will not be obligated to implement any cost reductions that would cause undue project
management burden on OCSD staff or adversely affect public or political harmony.
1
February 25, 1999
Continued Consulting
MAKESENSE, INC. will provide, at no additional charge, limited consulting for all accounts previously
audited for a period of 12 months beginning at the close of the audit Free services will be limited to those
issues that can be addressed via phone, fax, or mail. Should there be any costs to secure information or
documentation from your providers, OCSD will be advised of such costs and given the opportunity to end
our involvement before incurring those costs. OCSD can expect to receive the following MAKESENSE,
INC. services for free:
• Follow-up on implemented cost reductions.
• Explanation of billed items and charges.
• Review of existing billing.
• Review of alternate proposed services, rates, equipment, etc.
• Correction of new errors in billing.
The following more intensive services are available to OCSD at an hourly rate:
• Assistance preparing Requests For Proposals(RFPs).
• Assistance evaluating responses to RFPs.
• Assistance with any specialized projects.
BatRependrs, vA�l
X4 z4z ` I'
Roper Brow
MWESENSE, Inc.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS meadng wu I To W.of Dir.
}2asg
AGENDA REPORT Hem Number 11 um0er
Orange County Sanitation Distri
FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering
Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer
SUBJECT: COOPERATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR THE GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER
REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 11-17-3
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Authorize execution of a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of
Huntington Beach providing for reimbursement by the City for two City projects to be
constructed by the District in conjunction with the Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer
Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3; and (2) Authorize payment by the District to the City
of Huntington Beach in an amount not to exceed $20,000 providing for AC pavement
overlay in connection with Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract
No. 11-17-3.
SUMMARY
The Orange County Sanitation District (District) is planning to award a contract for
construction of the Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-3,
and the Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No .11-20, in June 1999. The City of Huntington
Beach (City) has two projects that are scheduled for construction in the summer of 1999:
(1) Street improvements on Goldenwest Street between Slater Avenue and Warner
Avenue; and (2) Storm drain improvements in Goldenwest Street from the Wintersburg
Channel to Norma Drive. The District and City desire to enter into a Cooperation and
Reimbursement Agreement to minimize cost impacts and disruption to the public.
The City will reimburse the District for their construction costs, estimated at $550,000, plus
5 percent for District construction management and administration, estimated at $27,500.
The District will pay the City for the new asphaltic concrete (AC) overlay required within the
Contract No. 11-17-3 pipe trench limits, estimated at $20,000. The District responsibilities
under the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement will be funded from the project
contingency. Staff recommends approval of the Cooperation and Reimbursement
Agreement.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
An additional $550,000 is requested for the construction of Contract No.11-17-3. An
increase of$27,500 is also requested for the District Construction Staff. Reimbursement
from the City in the amount of$577,500 will pay these estimated costs. The District
payment in the amount of$20,000 for the City street improvements will come from the
project contingency. See attached 'Budget Information Table."
C4Vp &&Qm d Repro MBw t-174 AR W4N, J1
Rem.e, ermMe Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT '
® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Item:Section 8, Page 7,Zone 11c-Goldenwest Street
Trunk Sewer Replacement)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District and the City have construction projects potentially in conflict with each other in
Goldenwest Street, in the summer of 1999. One City project is for street improvements on
Goldenwest Street between Slater Avenue and Warner Avenue, estimated at $350,000.
The other City project consists of storm drain improvements in Goldenwest Street from the
Wintersburg Channel to Norma Drive, estimated at $200,000. The District and City desire
to enter into a Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement in an effort to minimize cost
impacts and disruptions to the public. This agreement provides for bidding and
constructing the City projects concurrently with the District project, under Contract
No. 11-17-3. The elements of the Agreement include the following:
District Obligations
• Tying in existing City gravity sewer facilities (connected to the existing OCSD 15-inch
Goldenwest Trunk) to the new Goldenwest Trunk, Contract No. 11-17-3
• Letting and administering a construction contract incorporating District and City projects
• Providing construction inspection services for the District Sewer Projects
• Reimbursing the City for an estimated 400 tons of AC pavement for the overlay
required within the Contract No. 11-17-3 pipe trench limits. This overlay is part of the
City street improvements and is the District responsibility estimated at $20,000
• Obtaining all permits required for construction of the District sewer projects
City of Huntington Beach Obligations
• Contracting and paying for design and construction support services necessary for the
City Street Improvements and Storm Drain Project
• Reimbursing the District for the actual cost of construction for the City projects as
identified in the awarded schedule of prices, in addition to field change orders approved
by the City, estimated at $550,000
• Reimbursing the District for Construction Management and Administration (not
including inspection) in the amount of 5 percent of actual City construction costs,
estimated at $27,500
• Providing finished plans and detailed specifications for the City projects to the District
by the date indicated in the agreement
• Abandonment of the City Mycroft Sewer Pumping Station which will no longer be
necessary upon completion of the District sewer projects
• Providing construction inspection services for the City projects
• Obtaining all permits required for construction of the City projects
•VN 1ON ends C R RegmUwnt Bo rW11.17.3 AR 32AN M
R. . xi•A Page 2
When all the work is completed, a full accounting will be performed to determine final
amounts owed under the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement. Invoices due to
each party shall be paid within 45 days of billing. The other specific requirements
contained in the Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement include insurance, term,
notices, dispute resolution, force majure, governing law, waiver and modification.
Modification to the Agreement shall be in the form of a written amendment and signed by
each party. Staff recommends approval of the Cooperation and Reimbursement
Agreement.
ALTERNATIVES
The District has the option of providing no coordination for the proposed projects. District
Staff does not recommend this alternative because of the inconvenience to the public.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. The Final EIR was
approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
BDB:jak:jo
G:WglabaMgenda Draft RepodWoht Boerds171A7�3 AR 32499.dot
GU,OW gmEaQ RapftV nr�1117J M 34N tr+1
Rm.aP. eaaae Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement
Contract No. 11-17-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 5.000 $ 2.900 $ - $ 2,900 $ 2,900 $ - $ 2.900 $ 2 900 100%
Design Staff $ 100 000 $ 210 455 $ - S 210,455 $ 210,455 $ - $ 210 455 $ 20 000 10%
Consultant PSA $ 85,000 $ 83,000 $ - $ 83,000 $ 83,000 $ - $ 83,000 $ 46.910 57%
Construction Contract $ 2000000 $ 2432075 $ 550000 $ 2982075 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
Construction other $ 8,160 $ 8160 $ - $ - S 0%
Construction Staff $ 300,000 $ 575,085 $ 27,500 S 602,585 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
Contingency $ 240000 $ 608,725 $ 20000 $ 588725 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
District Reimbursement to
City- $ 20,000 $ 20
Reimbursement from City
of Huntington Beach" $ $ 577,500) $ 577,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
TOTAL $ 2,730,000 1 $ 3.920,400 $ - $ 3,920,400 ": $ 296,355 $ - S 296.355 $ 69.810 2%
District responsibility for a.c. street overlay within trench limits
"Estimated City Construction costs plus 5% for District Management and Administration
HA"Ale.,W-CM-17-3Wud,1 Inrn Ibl
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Cade Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on '-fi ., -� � . 1 stf was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on &"k i7 . 19/` .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ��day of
�1 tz� Gv 19ia
�j
Penny M.. Kyi , Secre
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
H:%W P.DTMADMINkWFOR MS\F27A