HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-24 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
February 17, 1999
phone:
0141962-2411
,n.Iling address: NOTICE OF MEETING
RD. eo.e127
°°nezi2a-812 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
street address: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Joe44 eks Aaenu.
Faontem Valle,G
92J08-J016 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1999 - 6:30 P.M.
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
rai
Aug_ies Fountain Valley, California 92708
•
clue. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Ananarm Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date.
area
Buena Perk
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beech
Irvine //K
Le Habra
La Palma B rd Secret
ft
Lee Alamitos
Newport Reach
Grange
Placentia
Santa Ana Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Seal Beach
S amen
Tustin
Vlle Perk STEERING COMMITTEE/EMT
yorbe unda RETREAT - Saturday, February 20, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.
euunty of orange
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
sanitary Districts
OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
Coate mesa TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 3, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.
Midway City
Water Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND
Ir�rne Pn h CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, March 4, 1999 at 5:30 P.M.
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 10, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE GWR SYSTEM - Tuesday, March 23, 1999 at 5:30 P.M.
STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC
COMMITTEE Re STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, March 24, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
�o vrorect ma s'unlu:Naoun end mo❑vmron„wn, Excellence m Wastewater bysmrns'
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meetina
March March 24, 1999
April April28, 1999
May May 26, 1999
June June 23, 1999
July `July21, 1999
August August 25, 1999
September September 22, 1999
October October 27, 1999
November "November 17, 1999
December 'December 15, 1999
January January 26, 2000
February February 23, 2000
March March 22, 2000
`Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 2/24/99 TIME: 6:30 P.M.
(SIMONIAN) ....................ANDERSON...................
�L —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................�L ✓ —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................
(COOK) ............................ COLLINS.......................
_G —
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.....................
�L ✓ —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................�/_ ✓ — —
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE.....................
� —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. i ✓ —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................
L ✓ —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................' —
(WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON...................
� ai —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................J� /1 fulmie�
(MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... 1� ✓ —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... _ ✓ —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. �_ ✓ —
(WALKER)........................ MINER-BRADFORD........ i ✓ —
(SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... i ✓ —
(EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ �� —
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ —
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ v ✓ —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ — —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... �L —
(SMITH, CHUCK)............. SPITZER....................... ai r —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN...........................
� ✓ —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... —
STAFF: VOL,
Anderson ✓ �Kep
d li Hog G
Hod es ✓
Kyle ✓
McIntyre
Miles ✓
Ooten ✓
Petennan /
Streed
Tuchman ✓
OTHERS: G
Woodruff ✓
Andrus
0=4/99
%VadonWaWl lwp.dteledmin%BSMlRECTORTlrect=Ron Call.dm
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
February 24, 1999-6:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has
been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. '..
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion
and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any:
a. Authorizing consideration of Item 19(b)and (c) listed below which
arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time
pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2).
b. Verbal report of General Counsel
C. Authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed for an existing sewer
easement located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk
Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company and a subsidiary of Unocal Corporation, in a form approved by General
Counsel.
H:\wp.dlaragendasoard AgendaMl999 Board AgendaMM499supplemenlal.doc
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
February 24, 1999—6:30 p.m.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 19.
Authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed for an existing sewer easement
located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract
No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and a
subsidiary of Unocal Corporation, in a form approved by General Counsel.
SUMMARY
The Board of Directors authorized the General Manager to quitclaim three existing sewer
easements on the site of the former Imperial Golf Course in the City of Fullerton at the regular
meeting of the Board of Directors on January 27, 1999. Subsequent to that meeting and prior to
the City of Fullerton recording Tract Map No. 15773, Cal Pac Remediation Company discovered
that another easement exists, granted to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County in
1993, encumbering the development for Tract Map No. 15773. Cal Pac needs to have this
addition easement quitclaimed to them.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
Not Applicable
CFW:jak
H:\wp.dtMagendM8oard Agenda Reports\1999 Board Agenda RepodsWgWern IgAoo
BEFORE THE
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH APPEALS BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In The Matter of the Appeal of: )
DOCKETS 94-R3D1-1205
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ) through 1208
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA )
P.O. Box 8127 )
10844 Ellis Avenue )
Fountain Valley, California 92708 )
TRANSMITTAL
EMPLOYER )
1
The attached Decision was issued on the date indicated therein. If you are
dissatisfied with the Decision, you have thirty (30) days from the date of
service of the Decision in which to petition for reconsideration. The petition
for reconsideration must be sent to:
Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board
1300 "I" Street, Suite 940
Sacramento, California 95814
Your petition for reconsideration must fully comply with the requirements of
Labor Code Sections 6616, 6617, 6618, and 6619 and with Title 8, California
Code of Regulations, Section 390.1.
For further information, call: (916) 322-5080.
OSHAB 20 (9/88)
BEFORE THE
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH APPEALS BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS '
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Appeal
of: DOCKETS 94-R3131-1205
through 1208
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. Box 8127 DECISION
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Employer
Background and Jurisdictional Information
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California (Employer) is a
combination of nine agencies who jointly own a waste treatment plant. At the
time the citations were issued; Employer was installing a diversion gate valve in
a concrete channel to transport wastewater. From February 2 through May 10,
1994, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (the Division), through
William Loupe, Cal/OSHA Associate Engineer-Compliance, conducted an
accident investigation at a place of employment maintained by Employer at
22212 Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach, California (the site). On May 13,
1994, the Division cited Employer for the following alleged violations of the
occupational safety and health standards and orders found in Title 8,
California Code of Regulations':
Citation Section Violation Penal
1 5157(c)(2) Serious $ 02
[failure to post danger signs]
2 5157(c)(8)(A) Serious $ 0
[permit space notification]
3 5157(c)(8)(B) Serious $ 0
[hazard notification]
Unless otherwise specified, all references are to Sections of Title 8, California Code of
Regulations.
' No civil penalty was proposed as Employer is a public entity.
4 5157(c)(8)(C) Serious $ 0
(precautions notification]
Employer has filed timely appeals contesting the existence of the alleged
violations.
This matter came on regularly for hearing before Ashaki A. Hesson,
Administrative Law Judge for the California OccupationalSafety and Health
Appeals Board, at San Bernardino, California, on January 22, 1997, at
1:00 p.m. Employer was represented by Thomas F. Nixon, Attorney. The
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (the Division) was represented by
Leonard Strom, Staff Counsel. Oral and documentary evidence was introduced
by the parties and the matter was submitted on January 28, 1999.
Dockets 94-R3D1-1205 through 1208
Law and Motion
The parties stipulated to the following statement of facts:
1. Prior to February 1, 1994, the County of Sanitation Districts Orange
County, California ("Districts") contracted with an engineering
construction firm, Pascal & Ludwig Engineers ("Pascal & Ludwig") .to
perform a construction operation at the Districts' wastewater treatment
facilities located in Huntington Beach, California. The construction
operation involved the installation of a large diversion gate, known as a
butterfly valve, in a concrete channel for transporting wastewater
influent (hereinafter referred to as the "channel"). The diversion gate is a
permanent structure in the channel. (A copy of the plans have been
attached as Exhibit 1) No employees, of the Districts were involved in the
,construction operations except for inspection and operations except for
inspection and oversight for specification compliance.
2. The channel, which is open air down its entire length of over 500 feet,
is approximately 7 feet wide and 7 feet deep with a 3-4 foot top opening
for access. During normal operations, partially treated wastewater flows
through this channel into a clarifier as part of the wastewater treatment
process. This channel qualifies as a confined space subject to certain
provisions of Article 108 of Title 8, California Code of Regulations.
3. Upon commencement of the construction operation, the influent
channel was drained of nearly all wastewater and sludge (approximately
3. inches in depth remaining except for the actual work area which was
2
dry). The influent channel was drained solely for the construction `
operation. While Pascal & Ludwig employees were lowering the gate into
place, they determined that the gate would not quite fit into the channel.
In order to accomplish the necessary installation, the contractor's
employees proceeded to use a pneumatic hammer, connected to an air
hose, to chip away and widen the concrete vertical walls of the channel
in order to slije the gate into place.
4. On February 1, 1994 during the course of this operation, a fire
occurred in the channel ("the channel"). The fire caused fatal injuries to
two Pascal & Ludwig employees and injured another of its employees.
5. The incident occurred during the course of a construction operation as
defined and regulated by Title 8, California Code of Regulations,
§ 1502.
Division Investigation of the Incident
6. Following the February 1, 1994 incident, the Division initiated an
accident investigation. At the outset, Division employee William Loupe,
who was in charge of the investigation, represented to the Districts that
Pascal & Ludwig, not the Districts, was the subject of the investigation.
7. In early May 1994, Mr. Loupe informed Districts' Staff for the first time
that the Division intended to issue citations to the Districts.
8. Mr. Loupe indicated to Districts' Staff that there had risen a difference
of opinion at the Division as to the applicability of Title 8, California Code
of Regulations, ("CCR") Section 5157 to the Districts and that the
Division had recently decided to issue citations to both Pascal & Ludwig
and the Districts.
9. The Division's investigation led to the preparation of two reports, one
relating to Pascal & Ludwig (Ex.4) and the other relating to the Districts
(Ex.3). In its report relating to Pascal & Ludwig, the Division noted as
follows:
confine (sic) space operations, Section 5158 will govern
this operation. NOTE: This employer is exempt from
the entry requirement 5157." (Ex. 4, p. 5)
10. The report stated that the reason that § 5157 did not apply is that
"[ajny construction contractors are exempted from the permit
.requirement (per § 5156)." (Ex. 4, p. 5).
3
11. On May 13, 1994, the Division issued citations to Pascal Ss Ludwig
for'violation of the following CAL OSHA regulations:
§ 5158(c)(1)(A) Employer failed to implement any
written understandable operating and rescue
procedures prior to entry into a confined space.
§ 5158(d)(3) Employer failed to require testing of
the air with an appropriate device or method to
determine whether dangerous air contamination
and/or an oxygen deficiency existed.
§ 5158(d)(8) Employer failed to prohibit a source
of ignition into a confined space until the
implementation of appropriate provisions of this
section have ensured that dangerous air
contamination does not exist.
§ 1675 6) Employer failed to require that a step
ladder in use be tied, blocked, or otherwise secured to
prevent it from being displaced.
12. On May 13, 1994,-the Division also issued citations to the districts
asserting violations of§ 5157 as follows:
§ 5157(c)(2) Employer failed to inform
employees, by posting danger signs of by any other
means, of the existence and location of any danger
posed by the permit space.
§ 5157(c)(8)(A) Host Employer failed to inform the
contractor that the work place contains permit spaces
and that the entry is allowed only through compliance
with a permit space program.
§ 5157(c)(8)(B) Host employer failed to apprise the
contractor of the elements, including the hazards
identified and the host's experience with the space,
that makes the space in question a permit space.
§ 5157(c)(8)(B) Host employer failed to apprise the
contractor of any precautions or procedures that the
host employer has implemented for the protection of
4
employees in or near perms aces where contractor's
employees will be working I
13. California's permit-required confined space regulations (Title 8, CCR
§§ 5156, 5157 and 5158) were adopted and became effective
approximately one month before the incident occurred. These regulations
are based on and are virtually identical to the permit required confined
space regulations established by the Federal Occupational Safety and
Health Administration("Fed-OSHA").
14. The Districts agree that § 5157 applies to Districts except when the
Districts engage contractors to perform construction in confined spaces
as defined in Article 108.
15 Section 5158 applies to construction .employees of a contractor
working on a host employer's site.
16. The parties also stipulate to the introduction of the following
documents into evidence:
1. Plans for construction project
2. Division Reports re Pascal & Ludwig
3. Division Reports re County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County
4. Citation to Pascal & Ludwig
5. Citation to the Districts
6. State Regulations: Title 8, CCR § 5156, 5157, 5158
7. 29 CFR Parts 1910: Permit-Required Confined Spaces for
General Industry; Final Rule (Federal Register, pages 4462-
4563) (January 14, 1993)
�At the hearing, the parties submitted the following issue for
determination:
1. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
("Districts" assert that § 5157 did not apply to the Districts at the time of the
February 1, 1994 accident because Pascal & Ludwig was the "employer"
performing construction work, i.e., the "host employer" requirements specified
in § 5157 did not apply to Pascal & Ludwig.
While this citation refers to § 5157(c)(8)(B), the statement of the alleged violation set
forth in the citation tracks the language in § 5157(c)(8)(C).
5
' 2. The Division of Occupational Safety and Health ("Division") asserts
that § 5157 did apply to the districts at the time of February 1, 1994 accident
because it was a host employer.
Stipulations
The parties stipulated to the facts set out above, leaving in issue only
whether the confined space requirements of§ 5157 applied to "Host" Employer,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California on the day of the
accident. The permit-required confined space requirements of§ 5157 apply to
confined space activities, except as specifically excluded under § 5156(b)(2).
§ 5156(b)(2) specifically excludes construction operations, as in the instant
case, where employees of Employer Pascal & Ludwig. Engineers were
performing work under the direct supervision of Employer.
Findings and Reasons for Decision
The confined space requirement of § 5157 are
inapplicable to host employer of a construction
operation. Violations of §§ 5157(c)(2),
5157(c)(8)(A), 5157(c)(8)(B), 5157(c)(8)(C) were
not established.
Employer was cited under § 5157, which provides in
pertinent part that:
Section 5157 Permit-Required Confined Spaces.
(a) Scope and application. This section contains
requirements for practices and procedures to protect
employees from the hazards of entry into permit-
required confined spaces. This section applies to
employers as specified in Section 5156(b)(1).
§ 5156. Scope, Application and Definitions.
(a) Scope. This Article prescribes minimum standards
for preventing employee exposure to confined space
hazards, as defined by Section 5156(b), within such
spaces as silos, tanks vats, vessels, boilers,
compartments, ducts, sewers, pipelines, vaults, bins,
tubs, and pits.
(b) Application and definition.
6
(1) For operations and industries not identified in
subsection (b)(2), the confined space definition
along with other definitions and requirements of
Section 5157, Permit-Required Confined Spaces
shall apply.
(2) The confined space definition along with other
definitions and requirements of section 5155.
Other Confined Space Operations shall apply to:
(A) Construction operations regulated by section 1502;
It is undisputed that the installation of the diversion gate or butterfly
valve, in the influent water channel was a construction project. It is also
undisputed that the Host Employer had no employees at the cite as all work
was being performed by the engineering construction firm. § 5156(b)(2)4
specifically excludes construction operations, from the purview of§ 5157.
Clearly the language of § 5157 is ambiguous. However, the uncertainty
should be resolved by the Standards Board. The Division should not have the
insurmountable responsibility of attempting to make Host Employers come
within the confines of the cited section and once it does, Host Employers ought
not then have to fight their way out. § 5157 does not apply to the work activity
being performed on the day of the accident. Hence, Employer's appeal is
granted and the citations are set aside.
Decision
It is hereby ordered that the citations are established, modified, or
withdrawn as indicated above and set forth in the attached Summary Table.
• It is further ordered that the final penalties assessed for each citation, as
well as any terms governing the permissible period for payment of the final
penalties, are indicated above and set forth in the attached Summary Table.
ASHAKI A. HESSON
Administrative Law Judge
Dated: February 4, 1999
AAH:mI
' The California confined space regulations are closely patterned after the Federal
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Fed-OSHA) confined space regulation
(§ 1910.146(a)) which "explicitly excludes agricultural, construction, and shipyard
employment from the scope of the standard." [emphasis added]
7
SUMMARY TABLE
DECISION
Abbreviation Key:
In the Matter of the Appeal of:
Rcg=Regulatory
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California G=General W=Willful
Dockets 94-R3D1-1205 through 1208 S=Serious R=Repeat
Er=Employer
Dosh=Division
IMIS No.119994534
C A V
DOCKET I I SECI'ION T F A PENALfY PENALTY FINAL
T T Y MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL F C PROPOSED PROPOSED PENALTY
A E P I A BY DOSH BY DOSI-1 ASSESSED
T M E R T IN AT BY BOARD
I E D CITATION HEARING
O D
N
94-R3D1-1205 1 5157c 2 S ALJ set aside. X $0 $0 $0
94-R3D1-1206 2 5157 c 8 A S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0
94-R3D1-1207 3 5157c 8 B S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0
94-R3D1-1208 4 5171 c 8 C S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0
Sub-Total $0 $0 $p
Total Amount Due- $0
NOTE: Payment of final penalty amount should be (INCLUDES APPEALED CITATIONS ONLY(
made to:
Accountfng Office (OSH) 'You will owe more than this amount if you did not appeal one or more citations or
Department of Industrial Relations items containing penalties. Please call (415) 972-8700 if you have any questions.
P.O. Box 420603
San Francisco, CA 94142 POS: 02/04/1999
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, the undersigned, declare as follows:
I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years and not a
party to the within action; my place of employment and business address is
Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, 100 North Barranca Street,
Suite 410, West Covina, California, 91791.
On February 4, 1999, I served the attached DECISION by placing a true
copy thereof in an envelope addressed to the persons named below at the
address set out immediately below each respective name, and by sealing and
depositing said envelope in the United States Mail at West Covina, California,
with first-class postage thereon fully prepaid. There is delivery service by
United States Mail at each of the places so addressed, or there is regular
communication by mail between the place of mailing and each of the places so
addressed:
Craig G. Farrington
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000
Orange, CA 92868-4720
District Manager
DOSH - Anaheim
2100 E. Katella Avenue, Room 140
Anaheim, CA 92806
Mike Mason
Chief Counsel
DOSH - Legal Unit
P. 0. Box 420603
San Francisco, CA 94142
Leonard Strom
Staff Counsel
DOSH - Legal Unit
3550 West Sixth Street
Room 421
Los Angeles, CA 90020
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on February 4, 1999, at West Covina, California.
i L tz L
eclara
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on 19E was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on , 19fz
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 0I day of
19±.1
Penny M. KyI6, Secre
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HAW P.DTA\ADMIMBS\FOFMS\F27A
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
February 17, 1999
phone:
(7141 96 2-2 41 1
To the Chair and Members
"'aging add^se" of the Board of Directors
P0. Dr.8127
Fountain Vall,C
92726-6127 Subject: Board Lefter
street addrea.:
10344 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Vanay.cA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
927❑D7019 information on any of the items, please call me.
1998 Yearend Report of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (SARWG)
Ace.atr I have attached the SARWG 1998 Year-end Report dated December 31, 1998 from
e Lindell Marsh which describes the efforts and accomplishments to date, and outlines
cltlas plans for 1999-2000. Also attached is a January 27, 1999 letter to Blake Anderson
from Paul Sabatier. a professor at LC Davis, expressing an interest in the SARWG
Anaheim partnership. Blake will be interviewed to provide history of the partnership. It's
Brea interestingto note that this group has been recognized as a viable emit in such a
eaera Park 9 P 9 Y
cyareaa short time.
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Gordon Brace Huntington Beach Orange County Bankruptcy Update
Irvine
to Habra Attached is a February 4, 1999 letter from the OCIP attorney updating the Pool
palm.
Alama pending le members on the status of endin islation.
Los 9
Newport 9each
Orange
Placertia Meeting Start Time Change for FAHR Committee
Sarta Are
seal Beach
Stanton The start time for the FAHR Committee has been changed to 5 p.m. At their next
Tustin
Ville Perk meetings, the OMTS and PDC Committees will also consider earlier start times.
Yorta Lints
County or grange Report from CASA
Sanitary, Districts Mike Dillon, Executive Director of CASA, provided a report the political landscape for
rascal Mae. 1999-2000 in Sacramento. A summary follows, and a copy of Mike's report is
Midway cuy attached.
Witter gletrltte
Overview
Irvine Rench
The 1999-2000 California legislature session will be drastically different from the
previous session. There is now a democratic Governor and a majority of democrats
in both houses. The Senate is comprised of 25 Democrats and 15 Republicans, and
the Assembly is comprised of 48 Democrats and 32 Republicans. The Assembly is
'ID Protect We Puhhc Health erd the Environment through Excellence In waatawater Syatarrs-
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 2
February 17, 1999
the most altered of the two houses, with sweeping gains by the Democrats and
drastic revamping of committee assignments. Governor Davis campaigned on the
platform of educational reform, gun control, and protecting the environment, among
other issues. His top priority is educational reforms.
Environmentalists Hopeful
The legislature is expected to be more "environmentally friendly." Environmentalists
hope to strengthen environmental laws now that a democratic majority exists in both
houses. Legislation that didn't pass under the Wilson administration, such as AB 278
(The Environmental Protection Act: Health Effects), has a good chance of passing in
the upcoming session. In fact, a new version of AS 278 that deals with health effects
of pollution on children has already been re-introduced as SIB 25, and a bill relating to
this same issue was recently introduced at the federal level. Environmental Justice
will remain a hot topic in environmental legislation. Mary Nichols, the new Secretary
of the State Resources Agency and a veteran environmental advocate in the
administrations of former Governor Jerry Brown and President Clinton, stated her top
priority is to use the current environmental laws to strengthen environmental
protection.
Governor's Plans for 1999-2000 Session
The Davis administration is still hammering out plans and policies for the 1999-2000
session. Beyond legislation, Governor Davis will have an opportunity to appoint new
members to dozens of boards and commissions, including the Air Resources Board,
the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and the State Water Resources Control
Board.
Update on Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee Activities
On January 29, 1999, proposals were due from cities for the District's Cooperative
Projects Program. Twenty-one proposals were received from nine cities and special
districts, requesting a total of$5.4 million in funding. Since one of these requests is
for a five-year period, the total net request for funding for the next fiscal year is
actually$3.2 million. The District's Strategic Plan indicates that inflow and infiltration
into our wastewater collection system can be reduced by a rate of up to 40 million
gallons per day by the year 2020. The Cooperative Projects Program is designed to
help fund projects that will reduce this inflow and infiltration, identify and eliminate
illegal connections to the sewer
It. *
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 3
February 17, 1999
and to repair or replace aging infrastructure. The Guidance Review Committee is
reviewing these proposals and will make recommendations to the OMTS Committee
at its March 3 meeting. The OMTS Committee will review the Guidance Review
Committee's recommendations and may make further recommendations before
forwarding to the Board for final approval of the selected projects.
Attached is a copy of a report that was presented at the February AMSA conference
in Phoenix. It is entitled, "The Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey'. This is an
interesting document as it points out the perception of the American people on aging
infrastructure. The repair or replacement of aging infrastructure is one of the areas
that our Cooperative Projects Program is targeting.
New Technical Assistance Center Brochure
Water-based Cleaners Brochure, Switching to Water-based Cleaners for Repair
and Maintenance Parts Cleaning(copy attached)
In September 1996, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
passed an amendment to its Rule 1171 with the purpose to reduce volatile organic
compounds (VOC) emissions from solvents used by auto repair and maintenance
shops to clean parts. Although the rule does not prohibit the use of solvents, to meet
the limits set by the ruling, facilities that use solvents to clean parts for automobiles
have to switch to water-based cleaners. The compliance deadline was January 1999.
The implementation of the rule will dramatically increase the use of water-based
cleaners in the South Coast basin. Because the new cleaning solutions, as the name
implies, have water as the basis for the formulation, it is expected that most of the
users will consider discharging the used, or spent, cleaners to the sewer. There are
about 2,300 facilities in the District's jurisdiction, and 40,000 in the South Coast area
(based on SCAQMD assessment). Although the number of dischargers is large, the
overall discharge volume and impact on the District is expected to be insignificant.
However, the cumulative effect of the pollutants in the discharges may be of concern.
While the cleaning solutions themselves may not have any pollutants of concern,
tests conducted by sanitation agencies have demonstrated that the spent cleaning
solutions contain high levels of toxic organics, heavy metals, and oil and grease, and
would not meet the District's wastewater discharge limits.
With the rule now in effect, and most auto shops either already converted or
converting to water-based cleaners, the District's Technical Assistance Center has
developed a brochure that summarizes all the information regarding the switch to
water-based cleaners and provides details about equipment and water-based
cleaners. The brochure is titled Switching to Water-based Cleaners for Repair and
Maintenance Parts Cleaning. This brochure comes at the end of a two-year outreach
program of workshops conducted in partnership with other sanitation agencies in the
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 4
February 17, 1999
region, SCAQMD, suppliers and industry. The core of the fold-out brochure consists
of details of equipment and their usage, basis for system selection, and the do's and
don'ts of water-based cleaners. The message of the brochure is environmentally safe
and practical disposal of the spent water-based cleaners. The brochure warns that
the spent solution should never be discharged to the sewer without treatment, and
recommends that the facility considers a more practical alternative such as hauling by
licensed wastehaulers.
The brochure will be distributed to the auto repair shops in the District's jurisdiction by
mailings and by Source Control staff as part of its routine fieldwork.
Groundwater Replenishment System Update
The environment work for the Groundwater Replenishment System project, which
was started in December 1997, is nearly complete. Next month at our regular
March 24 Board meeting, we will be joined by the Board of Directors of the Orange
County Water District, and both Boards will consider certification of the Final EIR for
the project. The EIR has proceeded through a very public input procedure beginning
with two scoping sessions for the public and separate scoping sessions for staff of
your cities and government regulators, followed by the preparation of the Draft
Program EIR last November. The Joint Coordinating Committee, which is comprised
of Directors of both agencies, held a public workshop and a public hearing in
December. Eleven people submitted oral comments at the public hearing, and
twenty-two written comments were received by January 6, 1999. the end of the sixty-
two-day comment period.
You will soon receive copies of both the Draft and Final Program EIR in a separate
mailing. The Final EIR addresses all of the oral and written comments received. You
will receive resolutions providing for the certification of the EIR as part of your regular
March Board Meeting agenda package.
The Joint Coordinating Committee, which includes Directors Collins, Swan and
Eckenrode and three Water District Directors, Anthony, Kraemer and the committee
chairman, Director Pickier, is now working on a new public information campaign, a
required new health department report, and a consulting services contract for the next
phase of work, Project Development. The Committee is also overseeing grant
activities and developing strategies to implement the project. The Joint Coordinating
Committee meets on the second and/or fourth Tuesday (usually the fourth Tuesday)
at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District. You are encouraged to attend. If
you want specific information, please call Tom Dawes at 714 378-3205.
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 5
February 17, 1999
Complaints from Neighbors
We continue to receive a few odor complaints from our neighbors at Plant 2. Most of
these are not plant related, but rather identified as coming from other sources, usually
local storm drains in the area.
One noise complaint was received at Plant 1, and the source was identified by the
resident as coming from exhaust fans in the final clarifier complex. Construction
management staff is following up in an effort to correct this problem.
New Wastewater Management Brochure
Attached is our new general-information Wastewater Management brochure, which
was produced by the Communications Department. The brochure was designed as a
"stand alone" piece, suitable for mailing to various external audiences who have
called requesting information about our operations. The brochure will also be
included in our general-information packets, which are distributed to plant visitors and
by special request to other audiences. This new brochure explains what we do in
simple, non-technical terms and replaces an existing pamphlet that was produced in
1993. If you would like copies of the new Wastewater Management brochure, contact
Michelle Tuchman, 593-7120.
April 10 Board Workshop on Connection Fees
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee will hold a
special workshop on connection fees from 9 a.m. - 12 noon on Saturday, April 10, in
the Board Room. All Board members are invited to attend. The workshop was
requested by the FAHR Committee following a lengthy discussion of connection fees
at their February meeting. The purpose is to provide background information and
review alternatives prior to considering the proposed changes at the May Board
meeting.
T+
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 6
February 17, 1999
Published Articles of Interest
I have attached articles on issues of importance to the District that have appeared in
various publications that may interest you.
If you v ould like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald . McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
H%WP Dr.v,DumeoumrrenE RS tO. Eeo.nmm 22�ox
Attachments
FY r
SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED GROUP
--a collaborative planning dialogue facilitated by the Growth Management Institute
focused on concems,issues and opportunities regarding the Santa Ana Watershed
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT- Lmea L.Marsh.S.m .Larsen a Mari.19500 MarAMur.Sum 720.
Irma,CA 92512 Td:949.752-15M Fw:949-152E804 EUAal. rmnh@.Mmtaarol
1998 YEAR-END REPORT
December 31, 1998
by
Lindell L. Marsh, Siemon, Larsen & Marsh,
for the Growth Management Institute, as staff to the
Santa Ana River Watershed Group
The following is a report of the efforts and accomplishments of the Santa Ana River
Watershed Group (the 'SARWG") during the fourth quarter of 1998 and for the year,
with a view to 1999.
BACKGROUND
The focus of the group has been to address the problems related to the 50 square mile
Chino Basin dairy area and its unsewered population of 350,000 dairy cows and calves)
(the largest concentration in the world; with annual milk production of S I billion)
located at the heart of the Los Angeles/Riverside/San Bemardino/Orange County
Metropolitan region. The Santa Ana River Watershed ("SARW") which strikes through
this metropolitan region, has a population of 4.3 million people,expected to increase to
6.8 million within the next 20 years (currently one-eighth of California's population).
A major problem within the watershed is salt. Downstream of the dairies is a population
of 2.4 million people. Approximately 722,000 dry tons of manure are produced
This is the equivalent of an unsewered city of2.5 million people.
t The Chino Basin dairy production is more than one-quarter of the California production,which is the
largest in the nation
I 1997 production.
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Reportdoc I
v
annually within the area.' The Regional Water Board staff has estimated that a
..significant portion"of 13% of the total that was unaccounted for has been discharged to
the River and 54 % per cent retained in the Basin, resulting in about 33,442 tons of salt
reaching the �roundwater.s The groundwater basins provide major conjunctive use
opportunities that could address concerns regarding the state and inter-state water
shortfalls of available water from the Colorado River and the Bay-Delta. In turn,
increased salts in downstream water have significant health and cost impacts and sullies
efforts underway to reclaim urban waste water.'
Ancillary to the dairy-related concerns are concerns and opportunities with respect to
wildlife and the sustainability and economic competitiveness of the inland region. Prado
Basin and the adjacent dairy area are at the apex of a major regional open space system
running south (the Santa Ana Mountains) and west (Chino, Puente and Whittier Hills).
On the economic side, the dairy area is bound on four sides by major transportation
arteries (rail and highways)through the metropolitan region! Accordingly, it is a
significant area both from the perspective of natural environment and economic
competitiveness of the inland region. While its future is uncertain, it is clear that there is
a very brief window of opportunity within which to take advantage of the significant
opportunities presented — both economic and environmental.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The efforts of the SARWG over the past year have focused on this window and have
been extremely successful. Since the first tour and meeting of the Group on February 9
of this year,"SARWG has:
' It is estimated that there is currently more than 1.5 million tons of manure on the ground-in corrals,
composting facilities,etc.
' Dairy Update Report,California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region,
November 20. 1998.
° Some have suggested that the storage capacity of these basins could be one to three million acre feet.
' For example,the Orange County Water and Sanitation Districts are currently developing a"groundwater
replenishment system"that will reclaim through state-of-the-art micro-Filtration and reverse osmosis
100.000 acre/feet per year,one-sixth of County water consumption,.
s On the east is the 1-15 corridor(a future high speed rail line)which connects-through this area-
northern Mexico and San Diego with Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. On the north is the 1-10 and the 60
freeways and the major east/west rail line connecting-through this area--Los Angeles with points east. On
the south is the 90 freeway connecting San Bernardino and Riverside to Orange County and the coast The
rectangle thus bounded could be a major economic center for the Inland Empire.
' In mid-1997. funded by the Orange County Sanitation District and others, the Growth Management
Institute("GMI")began to scope a watershed approach, with interviews and early meetings on some
wildlife issues. In January 1997. a task group of the National Research Council of the National Academy
of Sciences toured the watershed under the leadership of Blake Anderson.a member of the group. 1 acted
as moderator for a discussion session of the group,which included Bob Feenstra of the Milk Producers
Council. From the resulting dialogue, both at the meeting and over the next month, the focus turned to the
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 2
U
• Obtained funding and firm commitments of over$13.1 mi 11 ion... and informal
commitments of more than$15 million"
for dairy drainage and run-off controls—
drainage basins, dikes, berms and a pilot dairy washwater sewering project. With
there funds and overtime efforts, the Count,of San Bernardino began digging the
first drainage basin two weeks ago!! At the request of the Group, Congress
provided$100,000 to the Corps for the Reconnaissance Study described below. In
addition, EPA has provided $22,000 to the Group for the process and has
committed $100,000 for the preparation of the Manure Management Strategy
described below.12
• More important, SARWG is an effective broad scale collaboration. It enjoys the
participation(directly and indirectly) by those representing virtually the entire
constituency of agencies and interests: dairies, conservation organizations, water
agencies (ground water, water supply dischargers, etc.), local agencies (counties,
cities), and state(Water Board, Resources, Fish and Game)and federal agencies
(EPA, USDA, Corps of Engineers and Department of Interior). This participation
has extended to the regional, state and Washington, D.C. offices of the agencies. A
key has been the increased capacity to communicate through e-mail and fazes, with
many participating only through e-mail(jar example, this report will be fazed or¢-
mailed to approximately 100 people). In addition, SARWG representatives have
met extensively with the various state and federal agencies (in California and
Washington, D.C.)and have coordinated with and provided information in support
of lobbyists with the various participants.
• SARWG is not a formal organization. It works through collaboration (promoted by
the Group), based upon broad vision and surgical initiatives" that are undertaken
Chino Basin dairy area and the SARWG quickened about that focus,with Anderson taking the chair of the
effort
10 For agricultural drainage and dairy washwater sewering:S5.5 million(USDA);S4.5 million(San
Bernardino County);and,S3.1 million in loan funds(State Water Board).
11 $10 million(State Water Board staff is informally prepared to recommend for further Flood control)
and,perhaps,S5 million more or less(USDA)for dairy and watershed efforts(based on language in the
FYt1999 budget directing USDA to continue working on the dairy effort).
"During 1998,SARWG received funding for the process from the following agencies: County of Orange,
Orange County Sanitation and Water Districts,Chino Basin Water Master,Chino Basin Water
Conservation District,and EPA(Region IX).with formal and informal commitments of additional funding
from the County of San Bernardino.the Milk Producers Council and the Municipal Water District of
Orange County.
" The word"surgical"was suggested by Blake Anderson during a discussion regarding the need for the
group to do more than talk and produce reports and plans. It was agreed that while we needed to evolve a
broadly shared"vision,"we also needed to develop and implement surgically focused initiatives. This is a
key to effective collaboration.
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\199S Year-end Report.doc 3
a
by individual participants and supported by the Group. Initiatives have included:
dairy drainage; manure and waste management: wildlife planning; and funding.
Specific efforts that have been undertaken pursuant to these initiatives include the
following:
1. USDA and Locally Funded Dairy Drainage Strategy. The $35 million San
Bernardino County flood control program, in part described above, to address
dairy drainage.
2. EPA Funded Manure Management Study. Initiation of the development of a
Manure Management Strategy, in part to be funded by EPA ($100,000). This
includes exploring the construction of a bio-digester(producing electricity) and
the establishment of a major co-composting site in the San Joaquin Valley that
can accept manure and biosolids from the watershed.
3. Corps Reconnaissance Study. Congressional authorization and appropriation
for a Corps of Engineers Reconnaissance Study focused on drainage,wildlife
habitat and recreation opportunities in the lower dairy area and watershed-wide.
4. USDA Watershed Planning and Efforts. Congressional direction has
provided that USDA will continue its program focused on the dairy area
problems. This coincides with and supports the EPAIUSDA National
Comprehensive Animal Feeding Operations effort ("EPAIUSDA APO
Strategy"), as part of the National Clean Water Action Plan to address non-point
source pollution.
5. DO[ and Local Agency Funded Wildlife Habitat Plan Scooing. We have
been working with San Bernardino County, the several affected cities, and
SAWPA to explore an effort to scope a wildlife planning effort that would focus
on the dairy area and high profile species such as the Santa Ana Sucker
(anticipated to be proposed for listing as a federally protected endangered
species) and the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (a federally listed endangered
species).
6. On-site Dairy Waste Management Program. Development of an on-site
waste management program, coordinated with the dairies, Regional Water
Quality Board and EPA. This would coincide with the renewal of the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit for the dairy area
and would implement the EPA/USDA AFO Strategy and the Clean Water
Action Plan.
The objective, and beauty, of these various scoping and study efforts will be the
production by May, 1999 of a more detailed strategic vision for the dairy area that is
shared by the entire SARWG, including those developing policy within the various
local, state and federal agencies and within the State legislature and Congress.
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Repurt.duc 4
a Finally, I believe that one of the most important achievements of SARWG is to
• provide a local, state and national model of a way to address various common
concerns and opportunities through collaboration that is both respectful of the
individuality (and sovereignty) of the interests and agencies involved and at the same
time effective. There is no regional agency (i.e., top down)control. The
administration of the effort is minimal and lithe. It works through informed, strategic
facilitation and individual action. The model is the American art of quilt-making,
respectfully and collaboratively stitching together the patches, in a manner that is
transparent, open, inclusive, principled and ethical -- based upon a broadly-held
vision and surgically focused initiatives.
LOOKING AHEAD TO 1999-2000
Concurrently, we are developing a 1999-2000 Strategic Action Plan. It will build on the
successes of 1998, continuing to focus and complete the dairy area programs and
expanding to support wildlife habitat concerns more broadly, as well as other water-
related concerns and opportunities. Highlights include the following:
• LeadershinofSARWG
The 1999-2000 program focus is the Chino Basin dairy area, but expanding to address
wildlife and other concerns on a more watershed-wide basis. Increasingly, it is
hoped and intended that the three counties (San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange)
and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("SAWPA'), a joint powers agency
of the five water supply districts will provide greater leadership within the Group. To
this end, it is anticipated that a co-chair will be added from the upper-watershed.14
• Program and Funding in General
With this in mind, the scoping studies,described above, being conducted in early
1999 (see discussion below) will provide the basis for both further project specific
funding in FY/1999 and FY/2000, as well as a general authorization at the state and
federal levels for the watershed as an urbanizing watershed of national significance.
We then anticipate major coordinated private sector, local, state and federal funding
for FY/2001. This is intended to dovetail with and support state and national
programs, including, for example, the Clean Water Action Plan; the EPA/USDA AFO
Strategy; wildlife conservation planning efforts and initiatives (including, endangered
species); regional, State and federal water quality and supply efforts (State Water
" It has been broadly observed that: leadership within the watershed must emanate from the upper
watershed for a variety ofreasons:and.such leadership will be welcomed by the lower watershed. Further,
while SAR WG is focused on watershed-related concerns and opportunities, the watershed may be a very
powerful geographic basis around which others may organize for a variety of regional,state and national-
level concerns. In this regard,some have observed the national leadership within the watershed provided
by. for example.Congresspersons Lewis.Calvert.Miller.Sanchez.Cos and Packard. In addition.Senator
Boxer has been particularly supportive of the Group's efforts.
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 5
a
Planning); sustainable ecosystems and communities; metropolitan initiatives (EPA);
and, watershed and river efforts (EPA, DOI, Corps, USDA, CEQ, BOR). While it is
acknowledged that areas such as the Everglades. Chesapeake Bay, and the Columbia
River Basin are ofgreater national priority, the SARW is a priority watershed within
a second tier(probably 50) ofsigniificant national watersheds. It can provide a
model for how this nation can address such watersheds.
In keeping with our view of the national significance of this watershed and the
SARWG approach as a model, we intend to expand our collaboration to work with
other interests and organizations. SARWG has the opportunity ofproviding
leadership in developing national policy on topics such as: collaborative approaches;
watersheds; water; wildlife and funding. Other associations and organizations that
SARWG could collaborate with include, for example: the Association of Municipal
Sewer Agencies, the California Association of Water Agencies, the National
Association of Regional Councils, the National Dairy Association, the National Farm
Bureau, the National Association of Counties, the National League of Cities,national
environmental organizations (e.g.,National Audubon Society, Sierra Club, The
Nature Conservancy, Defenders of Wildlife, the Environmental Defense Fund,
Natural Resources Defense Council), the National Association of Home Builders, and
the Texas Institute of Applied Environmental Research.
• Early 1999 Scooina Efforts
As briefly mentioned above, we anticipate that several scoping efforts focused on the
dairy area will occur during the first half of 1999, including: (1)the Corps
Reconnaissance Study of the lower dairy area; (2) the Manure Manage Strategy
including the scoping on an area-wide onsite waste management program; and (3) the
Scoping for a Wildlife Habitat Plan for the dairy area. These will be knit together to
provide a strategy for the dairy area as a whole.
-- Coordination of Scoping Efforts. Key will be our ability to coordinate these
scoping studies internally and at the local, regional, state and national levels. To this
end, we intend, for example, to establish a small coordinating group and to utilize
focused workshops in the Chino Basin area with the SARWG and others(we hope to
convene a two day retreat in early March), as well as workshops in the San Joaquin
Valley (related to manure management) in that this is the proposed further use area
for the manure--with the attendant salts issue--Sacramento with state agencies and
regional offices of federal agencies in Washington, D.C. (hopefully hosted by the
President's Council on Environmental Quality and GMI).
-- Systemic Approach. In addition, we hope that we can bring to bear national
experts(on, for example, manure management) as well as systemic thinking (we have
been discussing the possibility of collaborating with the Rocky Mountain Institute,
with its focus on systemic analysis).
C:\Files\SARW DOGS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 6
i -- Basic Assumptions. It will be important to address the fundamental questions
regarding the future use of the dairy area and the timing of such uses. In this regard,
for example, the dairies may choose to remain in the area provided that adequate
support systems are in place: relocate totally; or, relocate in part. Developing early
and appropriate assumptions in this regard will result in significant economic benefits
and savings to the dairies, as well as others involved in providing infrastructure and
other services in this area.
The scoping studies will provide the basis for further funding during Fys 1999.2000,
as well as FY 2001.i5 These studies are as follows:
1. Drainage Control Strategy. Our objective is to complete the $35 million
dairy drainage control program outlined by San Bernardino County. Assuming
that existing formal and informal funding commitments are reasonably realized,
we will need to identify approximately S7 million of additional grant funding to
complete the program. The completion of this program will be a major
achievement.
2. Manure Management Strategy("MMS"). Removing the more than 1.5
million tons of manure currently on the ground and developing a sustainable
system of handling future manure production(including urine) is critical. It
affects the quality of life of the dairy families,as well as the water quality within
the groundwater basins and the river—and in turn the effectiveness of our water
supply efforts downstream, statewide and inter-state. This is of the highest
priority. EPA funding will allow us to prepare a second iteration of the MMS by
May 1, 1999, with workshops in the Basin as well as in the San Joaquin Valley
and Washington, D.C."
The MMS currently includes the following elements:
a. On-site manure management: Development of an effective program to
provide 25 year storm protection for retention of wastes and the removal of
u Tentatively,we have discussed further FY 1999 funding of SS million from USDA and$10 million
(loans) from the State Water Board for dairy drainage improvements and for FY 2000,S 10 million from
federal sources and S5 million from state sources for drainage and manure management purposes. These
amounts will be revised as the studies are completed.
16 The involvement of San Joaquin Valley interests and agencies,as well as experts nation-wide,will be
important in that it is proposed that the Valley will be the primary destination for manure production(as a
soils amendment). Accordingly, in keeping with the principled approach of the SAR WG,they need to be
involved in questions of the quality of the materials and the impacts of the materials on the Valley. While
the materials an very valuable as a soils amendment,there are questions regarding salts and other '
concerns. The Valley currently has no drain;the San Luis Drain,proposed as pan of the State Water Plan
was never built,and may never be built because of concerns regarding the Son Francisco Bay and Delta,
the proposed discharge location of the Drain. These concerns must be addressed.
C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doe 7
r
manure from dairies." This is required by current regulations and will be
accomplished through cooperation between the dairies, the Regional Water Board
and EPA. It also will be a topic of the extension of the existing general IJPDES
permit for the area.
b. Biodieester: Explores the possibility of the construction of a biodigester that
will produce electricity and reduce the bulk of the manure that must be
transported out of the basin. Discussions are currently underway with prospective
developers and operators.
c. Maximization of Comoosters within the Basin: Focuses on maximizing the
throughput of the composters within the Basin(approximately 300,000 tons, of a
total of more than 700,000 tons produced). See footnote 17 above, for the Orange
County Water District's effort to encourage the maximization of the throughput.
There is currently a sense that the permitting of additional composting facilities
within the Basin would be a difficult undertaking. This assumption will be further
explored.
d. San Joaquin Valley Co-composter: Focuses on the development of a large-
scale, state-of-the-art composting facility in the San Joaquin Valley that would
accommodate manure, biosolids, and green and food wastes. The idea is that the
quality of the product could be significantly improved and controlled and,
thereby, would command a high price.
e. Transportation and Marketine of Materials: A factor underlying the Chino
Basin manure problem has been the loss of agricultural lands within the
immediate vicinity available for the spreading of manure(and for the production
of animal foodstock as well). In turn, the coordination of markets in distant
locations such as the San Joaquin Valley (and the seasonal needs of many farmers
in that area) and the necessary transportation (coordination of up and back trips)
with the seasonal (i.e., rain-related) needs of the almost 300 dairy owners in the
Basin has been very difficult to accomplish.
As discussed above,with the EPA funding, we intend to scope these elements,
utilizing workshops of experts as well as those agencies and interests involved
both within the Chino Basin and the San Joaquin Valley.
3. Wildlife Conservation Planning Strategy. Portions of the Chino Basin
(including the Prado Dam storage area)are important for wildlife and open space
purposes and there is the opportunity for expanding wildlife habitat from the
In 1998,the Orange County Water District paid down the S2.65 per ton tipping fee by SI.65 to
encourage the dairies to move their manure to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's composter,to the
extent of S 150.000. This was a good faith expression by the downstream water supplier of its willingness
to encourage the removal of manure before it reaches the groundwater and river(and in turn reducing the
salt content in these waters).
C:\FilesISARW DOCSX1998 Year-end Report.doc 8
s lower portion of the area upward upward. The intent is for SARWG to work
under the lead of the County of San Bernardino's multiple species habitat
conservation planning program, and in coordination with SAWPA, the affected
cities and the various interests, to scope a wildlife habitat plan for portions of the
dairy area, as well as to address several high profile species, including the Santa
Ana Sucker and the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. This scoping would be
completed by May 1, 1999.
4. Watershed Improvements and Funding. It is clear that the water-related
systems within the watershed must be developed, managed and funded in a
collaborative and coordinated manner. These include storage,conjunctive use,
water supply, reclamation and conservation. They also include, as shared with
others, wildlife, flood control,dairy operations, etc. It has been suggested that
SAWPA take the lead with the Group for the development of a proposal for water
bond funding ($350,000,000) for the watershed with a Congressional match.
By May, 1999,with the several scoping efforts completed in consultation with the
affected constituency of interests and agencies, we should have a strong sense of an
appropriate vision or visions for the area, together with immediate next steps and needs.18
IN CONCLUSION, I am very proud of and pleased with the SARWG effort to date.
We have made significant progress and have every reason to believe that we have laid the
foundation for even greater progress in 1999/2000. From a personal standpoint, it has
been very rewarding. This effort is on the cutting edge of the evolving forms of
governance. It speaks to both the need to respect the individual and to provide for
collaboration. We are developing a model that will, I strongly believe,have national
application.
Our success is the result of collaboration. In particular, I would like to especially thank
Blake Anderson for his vision, leadership and steadfast support; SAWPA for providing a
space to meet; Bob Feenstra for his expertise, savvy, good heart and willingness to apply
it all; Geoff Vanden Heuvel for his practical wisdom,principles and leadership; Ken
Miller for his efforts (overtime) and good nature; Felicia Marcos, Alexis Strauss, Clarice
Gaylord and Jim Earsom and the USDA folks for their support; Traci Stewart and Barry
Kehl for their support;Jerry King and Mary Jane Forster for their guidance and caring;
Senator Boxer; Congresspersons Lewis, Kim and Sanchez; Assemblymen Fred Aguiar
(now Supervisor) and Joe Baca(now State Senator);and Walt Petit and Bill Campbell,
and all of their staffs, for supporting our funding initiatives; Eric Sapirstein and John
Fisher for lobbying them for the Group; Jerry Thibeault for enduring and supporting; Jim
Ragsdale; Larry Walker for his clarity and leadership; Mike Cook and David Cottingham
for both staying over to tour the area. And the Group.
In addition,hopefully,we will be able to accomplish a number of helpful tasks.such as the preparation of
shared GIs data bases that will be available for all of these efforts.
C:\Files\SARW DOCSU998 Year-end Report.doc 9
�}�i'2rS ft ticc� �tEci=
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
aEMME12Y• DA\'IS •IRVIN[• LOSANGEL[5• NVCWIDC•$AN DIaGp SiN Fl4WCISCO � _ � SMTA BAA6MA SA\"I'A CRL"Z
DEPART..EW OF IRONMEN SC4 c,, NDMUI ONE S"�S AVENUE
DAVIS.CAL MMA 95616-9576
Blake Anderson January 27, 1999
Chief Operating Officer C /�*
Sanitation Districts of Orange County ( Toe CtQst\Gsr9tT
IOWEllis Ave. {
Fountain Valley,CA 92708 LlnAt `{/),y��(I. BO6
[� `ttj9C Slfttdlzr
Dear Blake Anderson: Bog CZ0U*T-LI t
'C", Mli-�s 71,11,Tflos�,w�r
In recent years,a large number of stakeholder-based watershed negotiation projects have been
formed in an effort to reconcile the competing uses affecting our state's streams and rivers.To date,
however, no one has a very good understanding of the factors that influence the ability of these
stakeholder partnerships to reach agreement on,and to actually implement,concrete management
measures.
We have recently received grants from the National Science Foundation and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to study these questions in as objective a manner as possible. One
hundred watershed partnerships in the states of California and Washington have been randomly selected
for detailed examination. The Santa Ana River Watershed Group is among the 100 partnerships selected.
In each partnership,we anticipate gathering data concemtng a story of the partnership and the
reasons affecting its ability to agree on, and implement,management plans. This will involve interviews
with 4-6 of the most important participants,gathering relevant documents, and sending a mail survey to
20-30 people knowledgeable about the partnership.
Our contacts in UC Extension, the California Department of Forestry,the Natural Resources
Conservation Service,and other organisations have suggested you as one of the most informed people
regarding the history of this partnership. One of our colleagues will be contacting you shortly to arrange
an interview at your convenience. The interview, which should last about an hour,will address the
history of the partnership,your perceptions of the factors affecting its ability to reach and implement
agreements,and your suggestions of knowledgeable people to survey. The information provided will be
completely confidential.
If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 530-752-3074(Sabatier)or
530-752-8027(Quinn). You may also wish to consult members of the project's advisory committee:
Mike Chapel(US Forest Service),Diane Holcomb(Natural Resources Conservation Service),Scott
Stone(Polo Land&Cattle Co.),Marc Hoshovsky(Cal.Fish&Game),Stefan Lorensato(State Water
Resources Control Board),or Carl Rountree(BLM). Thank you in advance for any assistance you can
provide.
Re zc
/ / /�• n
•W James Quinn,
Professor Professor
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES
Report of the Executive Director, Mike Dilloo
January 21, 1999
I. NEW SESSION OFF AND RUNNING
On December 7, 1998, members of the legislature were swom in to begin the 1999-2000 Legislative
Session. Both houses, containing Democratic majorities, will maintain the same leaders as last
session of Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa in the Assembly and Senate President pro Tem John Burton
in the Senate. Both houses then adjourned to return for the start of business the first week of January.
The 1999-2000 session got off to a controversial start on Monday,January 4, with the Assembly
Republican's objection to the new House Rules, proposed by the Democratic majority. Specifically,
Republicans tried to block a provision that will prevent individual legislators from offering motions to
withdraw bills from committee, to send them directly to the Floor. The practical consequences of this
rule will be to force the minority party to debate controversial issues only in policy committee,rather
than on the Floor, which has been a tool used by both parties in the past to elevate issues that had
been stalled or defeated in committee. The Rules ended up passing on a party-line vote on Monday.
U. NEW COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
The Assembly and Senate have released their respective lists of membership on the standing
committees for the nerd session. With the impact of term limits being felt, and the addition of more
than 30 new faces this year in both houses,the changes in committee compositions from just two
years ago are dramatic. Some committees of interest to CASA members are:
Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials: Hannah-Beth Jackson (Chair), Mike Briggs
(Vice Chair), Jim Cunneen, Ted Lempert, Alan Lowenthal, Ken Maddox, Carl Washington, Patricia
Wiggins.
Assembly Local Govemmen : John Longville (Chair),Ken Maddox (Vice Chair), Ellen Corbett,
Howard Kaloogian, Nell Soto, Bruce Thompson, Helen Thomson,and Tom Torlakson.
Assembly Natural Resources: Howard Wayne(Chair), Sam Aanestad(Vice Chair), Elaine Alquist,
Richard Dickerson, Hannah-Beth Jackson,Fred Keeley, Alan Lowenthal, Mike Machado, Carole
Migden, Rico 011er,and Robert Pacheco.
Assembly Water. Parks. and Wildlife: Mike Machado (Chair), Richard Dickerson (Vice Chair), Sam
Aanestad, Roy Ashburn, Thomas Calderon, Dennis Cardoza,Dean Florez,Dick Floyd, Peter Frusetta,
Sheila James Kuehl, Bob Margett, Virginia Strom-Martin,and Howard Wayne.
In the Senate...
Senate Agriculture and Water Resources: Jim Costa(Chair), Debra Bowen, Maurice Johannessen,
Dave Kelley,Dick Monteith,Deborah Ortiz, Steve Peace,Don Perata, Charles Poochigian,Jackie
Speier, and Cathie Wright.
I
Senate Environmental Oualitv: Byron Sher(Chair),Dede Alpert, Richard Alarcon, Wes Chesbro,
Tom Hayden, Bruce McPherson,Jack O'Connell,Richard Rainey, Hilda Solis, and Cathie Wright.
Senate Local Government: Richard Rainey(Chair), Joe Baca, Maurice Johannessen, Dick Monteith,
Don Perata, Richard Polanco, and Adam Schiff.
Senate Natural Resources and Wildlife: Tom Hayden (Chair), Dede Alpert, Debra Bowen, Maurice
Johannessen, Patrick Johnston, Tim Leslie, Dick Monteith, Byron Sher, and Hilda Solis.
III. GOVERNOR'S BUDGET RELEASED
On January 8, 1999, Governor Gray Davis held a press conference to announce the release of his
proposed state budget for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. The Budget Highlights document notes that the
"U.S. and California economies we expected to slow in 1999 and 2000" due to declines in consumer
spending and business investment, the recession in Asia,and a slowing in the state's monthly
employment figures. Given these understandings, the Governor has proposed a fiscally modest
budget, with heavy emphasis on improving standards and performance in K-12 education. County
Governments came out on the short end once again. While the Governor acknowledges that counties
are still financially squeezed from the property tax shift several years ago, he nonetheless reduces
funding for several county programs by almost$200 million and shifts the money to his own state
priorities.
Under the State Water Resources Control Board, the Budget Summary indicates that:
1) "In 1999-00, the Board expects to complete 3,110 compliance inspections of permitted facilities,
issue or update 938 water quality permits, issue 77 water rights permits, and adopt 6 major water
rights orders.
2) "The Budget includes an augmentation of$6 million(Federal Tmst Fund) and 30 positions to
address water pollution. Using a watershed approach, staff will work with stakeholders to identify
sources of pollutants within priority watersheds and develop limits for the total amount of waste that
can be discharged.
3) "The Budget includes an augmentation of$1.5 million (Waste Discharge Permit Fund) and ten
positions to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System storm water permits to 115
municipalities and an estimated 5,000 construction sites not currently regulated."
IV. BUDGET DOES NOT PROVIDE "FRAY" RELIEF FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Calling the proposal "A New Relationship for a New Century," the Governor has noted that the
property tax shift, "concurrent with a growing reluctance of voters to approve increased taxes and
compounded by economic difficulties during the 1980's and 1990's, has led to fierce state-local battles
over limited financial resources." However, the Budget Finance document hesitates to offer
assistance to local governments for ERAF relief in 1999, as the "state budget revenue growth is not as
high as hoped." It further adds: 'The Administration intends to establish the principle of sharing the
2
benefits of an improved California economy with local governments. At the same time, it is obvious
that state government cannot provide financial relief to local governments in good times and be
expected to provide the same level of support during troubled economic times." Consequently, the
"Administration will have a reasoned discussion with local elected officials and interested citizens.
This Budget offers to start that discussion and the Governor directs his Office of Planning and
Research,to make recommendations, within 45 days, on the proper forum and method."
The Governor's Director of Finance, Tim Gage,told those present at the Budget press conference that
there was a desire to mitigate the impact of the property tax shift, but given the current level of
revenues available, didn't anticipate a return of the ERAF revenues in the current year. He
nonetheless agreed that discussions needed to get underway to find a permanent solution to local
government finance relief.
V. GOVERNANCE CONSENSUS PROJECT
A group called the California Governance Consensus Project, administered under the auspices of the
California Center For Public Dispute Resolution,a joint program of California State University
Sacramento,and the McGeorge School of Law,has also been discussing major governance and
financing proposals. Under consideration are:
1) Restore accountability and financial stability to local government, and ensure that revenue
streams provide incentives for balanced growth,
2) Realign state/county responsibilities to make the state responsible for financing mandated
levels of financial aid and health services if it can be done in a manner that is revenue neutral to the
state General Fund,
3) Require the state legislature and Governor to adopt a balanced and timely budget, built
around a strategic long-term planning process that provides for protection of a budget reserve, makes
it more difficult to approve tax loop holes, and ensures fees are applied in an efficient and equitable
manner.
In addition to local governmentrepresentatives,others involved in the Consensus Project include
teacher unions, taxpayer groups, and business interests. What will come out of this group is still
uncertain as some of the issues are quite contentious. For example,the Howard Jarvis group is
declaring war on such issues as lowering the vote threshold on the use of property tax for local bond
proposals.
VI. COMMISSION ON LOCAL GOVERNANCE FOR THE 21n CENTURY
In 1997, a bill by Assemblyman Hertzberg(AB 1484), created the Commission on Local Governance
for the 219 Century. The commission,which will exist until January 1,2000,is comprised of 15
members: 9 appointed by the Governor, and 3 each appointed by the Senate and Assembly Rules
Committee respectively. The Commission has been charged with the task of completing a study of
"potential revisions to the laws that govem city,county,and special district boundary changes(the
3
local agency formation sections of the Government Code, also known as the Cortese-Knox Act.) The
members have also expressed interest in exploring other issues relating to the effectiveness and
efficiency of delivery of local government services."
The Commission had its first organizational meeting in September, and CASA was present at its
October meeting in San Diego where special district governance and organization issues were
discussed by representatives from San Diego LAFCO's, ACWA, and individual special districts. At
least a dozen other meetings are scheduled in various locations to make it easier for communities
throughout California to participate in commission hearings. CASA will be scheduled to speak at a
hearing in the Spring, and we will notify our members when the date has been officially set
VII. THE "RAINEY WORKING GROUP" AND THE "PEACE HEARINGS"
You will recall from our previous report to you in October, that CASA had been invited to participate
in a select group of local government lobbyists, whose goal was to discuss possible solutions to the
current way in which local government is financed. Senator Richard Rainey's Chief of Staff, Diane
Longshore has served as the leader of the group,and is assisted by various members of the Senate and
Assembly Local Government Committees. In early discussions,proposals such as a "protection
measure" to freeze out the state's ability to take any more ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation
Fund) money from local governments, or the old "Isenberg Superpot" concept from the Constitution
Revision Commission project, were debated. A November meeting found the group discussing
issues such as a clearer delineation of who should provide services, and securing a stronger "lock" on
the funding sources for those services.
Shortly thereafter,CASA was asked to participate in a working group called together by Senator
Steve Peace,new Chair of the Senate Budget Committee,to establish an ongoing dialogue on local
government finance and to evaluate current stateilocal financial relationships and proposals to reform
the system of local government finance. Participants in the initial meeting included lobbyists from
the major local government associations and key legislative staff. Senator Peace wishes to have six
regional meetings, beginning January 22, and ending February 8' , in Los Angeles, Placerville,
Oakland, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Merced. Eighteen local representatives, including six from
cities, six from counties, and six from special districts will be invited to participate in the three hour
meetings at each location, with Senator Peace chairing the meetings. Each meeting will begin with an
"independent reviewer," yet to be selected, who will provide a ten minute overview of the current
financing, including what has happened to local governments in the years since Proposition 13 and
the property tax shift. Senator Peace, who is well known for his ability to pull disparate groups
together on major issues such as electrical deregulation and worker's compensation reform, does not
wish to have any prepared presentations, but rather wants to have wide-ranging discussions with each
discussion group. ACWA, CSDA, and CASA are jointly submitting the names of the special
districts' representatives who will testify to Senator Peace and his staff.
4
VIII. Cal-PIRG SPONSORED WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION RE-INTRODUCED
Assemblywoman Carole Migden(D-San Francisco)has again introduced legislation mandating
stringent pollution prevention requirements, establishing mandatory penalties for water quality
violations,and requiring that discharge permits include effluent limits without regard to reasonable
potential analyses. AB 50(Migden)is similar to last year's AB 1862. The bill's provisions include:
• Mandatory pollution prevention measures on the part of all permitted discharges,
including complex pollution prevention cost analyses that use "full cost accounting
standard methods."
• Mandatory effluent limits for all pollutants, without regard to whether monitoring
information reveals reasonable potential for the discharge to cause or contribute to an
exceedance of a water quality objective.
• Non-discretionary minimum penalties for violations,which undemtine a reasonable
progressive approach to enforcement and intrude upon the enforcement discretion
vested in the regional boards.
• Legislative findings that are generalized,paint the majority of publicly-owned
treatment works as chronic violators,and ignore the fact that the majority of water
pollution problems are caused by nonpoint sources.
State Legislative Committee members have already begun drafting amendments to AB 50 that would
address CASA's concerns. AB 1862 advanced to the Senate last year before stalling in the Judiciary
Committee. Governor Wilson was expected to veto AB 1862 had it reached his desk. The fate of AB
50 is far less certain,however,given the new Administration.
IX. STATE AGENCY WORK GROUP WOULD ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
ISSUES
SB 89(Escutia)would require the Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency
(Cal/EPA)to convene an environmental justice working group of representatives from state
environmental agencies. The working group's charge would be to identify disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations. The
work group would include representatives of each of the boards, offices,departments and
commissions under CaVEPA,the Resources Agency and the Department of Health Services. Each
agency would be required to hold public meetings and develop model environmental justice projects;
develop an agency-wide environmental justice strategy;and provide minority and low income
populations with an opportunity to romment on the strategies.
5
X. SAN MARCOS REVISITED
In the 1987-88 Legislative Session, CASA and ACWA were extensively involved in legislation
relating to capital facilities fees. The Legislation, authored by Assemblyman Dom Cortese, was in
response to a 1986 decision of the California Supreme Court in San Marcos Water District v. San
Marcos Unified School District, in which the court held that the water district lacked the specific
statutory authority to impose a "capacity" of"capital facilities' fee to offset the capital costs of
providing sewer service to the San Marcos School District. The court decision came m a shock to the
cities, counties, and special districts that had been providing utility services to other public agencies
for decades and imposing charges for such services. The court suggested that the Legislature could
address the problem by.providing specific statutory authority for such charges,and a battle between
all segments of education, including the university, and local government ensued. AB 1350-Cortese
was ultimately enacted in 1988,after certain compromises had been reached by all parties.
Certain school districts and the University of California have taken legal action against several public
agencies, seeking a refund of capital facility fees dating back to 1988. This year,ACWA is
sponsoring legislation to clarify that water rates can include a component that reflects the cost of
operation,maintenance, repair,replacement or rehabilitation of facilities that provide public utility
service to schools, rather than only the construction costs of such facilities. CASA has been asked to
support ACWA's efforts.
XI. ROBERTA LARSON LENDING A HAND
CASA's Director of Regulatory Affairs, Melissa Thorme, is on maternity leave for the next few
months, after the birth of her second daughter, Anika. Melissa continues to do important work from
her home, including the Bio-solids and TMDL lawsuits, as well as many other issues you have read
about in her Regulatory Bulletin.
CASA's former Director of Regulatory Affairs, Bobbi Larson,with the law firm of DeCuir and
Somach, has been retained on a contract basis to supplement CASA staff efforts on legislative and
regulatory issues that demand her expertise in Sacramento. Bobbi has also been involved in the
above mentioned lawsuits on behalf of some of our individual CASA member agencies. President
Jim Bewley recently commented that,"this arrangement enables us to have two individuals with
particularly strong expertise in their respective areas." CASA is fortunate to have their assistance.
XIL LEGISLATION
Attached is a Legislative Summary of bills considered by the Legislative Committee to date. The
deadline for final introduction of bills is February 26. If this session is typical of prior sessions,
several thousand bills will be introduced in February.
6
FEE) 04 '99 13:27 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 6192361995 TO III r.ne
Pillsbury J4
�t>'via-0 tomp'
—O AnXXR E sAT"W
301 W=no"DWAY 9=na)
sAx pIFLp.(Aldlpvnu 911o1a,9
TnFFAlNIe(61"2 tan FA 019,2161905
IN YWA,.' NalFrvbwsr
Madison a
Sutro LLP
wr:�,win dW e„m r o=.0
(619) 544-3177
shel—pc@piEsburylaw.com
February 4, 1999
VIA FACSIMILE
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In Re County of Orange - Stains of Pending Litigation
Dear Pool Participants:
On Monday, February 1, 1999, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Taylor held hearings on
a number of motions regarding the Representative's remaining litigations. In particular, the
Court considered McGraw-Hill's motion for partial summary judgment on the contract and
professional malpractice claims pending against Standard & Poor's. The Court granted
summary judgment to McGraw-Hill and against the Representative on the single theory that
the Representative could assert multiple claims for financial advice separate from S & P's
bond rating function; however, the Court denied the motion as to all other claims, thereby
allowing all of the remaining causes of action to proceed forward to trial.
Judge Taylor them considered the two motions for partial summary judgment filed by
various broker/dealer defendants. These defendants argued that, based on the Court's Wiling
in County of Orange v. FLSecurities, Inc. (as described in my January 7, 1999
correspondence to you), the ultra vires issues raised in the broker/dealer cases should likewise
be decided in defendants' favor. Although Judge Taylor issued a tentative order denying
these motions, the matters were taken under submission and no final rulings have been issued.
The Court also heard argument on the Representative's motions for an order vacating
the previous decisions of the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court, which dismissed the
Representative's aiding and abetting claims against McGraw-Hill and Fuji Securities. As I
reported to you in my earlier correspondence concerning Judge Taylor's prior ruling granting
summary judgment to Fuji, the Appellate Court in California issued a ruling in City of
Atascadero v. Merrill Lynch, which calls Judge Taylor's earlier Fuji ruling into question and
appears to support the Representative's position not just against Fuji, but also against the
3M1 C6.40149 AH(aPFNEW Yo9[OtA c COUMY sACrAI.VMO VLA. (=0 suI Y.WEY WASNIMGlIX1.0.0 RRT0
1129860r.
FEB 04 '99 13:27 F P[L SMRY MADISON 6192361995 TO 16
Orange County investment Pool
Participants' Distribution List
February 4, 1999
Page 2
broker/dealers. Consequently, the Representative also sought to amend the complaint against
the broker/dealer defendants to add claims for aiding and abetting and other causes of action
based upon the Atascadero case holding. The Court also took these matters under submission
and will be the subject of a later written opinion by Judge Taylor.
We will continue to advise you of the status of these matters. In the meantime, please
do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions.
Very [Wily. yours,
Patrick C. Shea
cc: Official Investment Pool Participants
Committee and Counsel
zizseaa.
amsa
FaxAlert - -
January 29, 1999
AMSA Briefs Senate Environment A Public Works Committee
Last week, AMSA briefed Senate Environment& Public Works Committee staff on the Association's
legislative priorities for the 106i°Congress. While stressing the importance of the Urban Wet Weather
Management Act of 1999, nonpoint source pollution control and stepped up federal funding for CSOs,
SSOs, stormwater and nonpoint source controls,AMSA also informed Senate staff of the Association's
stance on other key issues including TMDLs, Superfund, pretreatment, watershed management, the
Municipal Biological Monitoring Act of 1999 and the Arid West Water Quality Act. AMSA explained to
Senate staff the problems facing wastewater agencies as a result of EPA's current TMDL program and
notified them of the Association's new TMDL guidance encouraging dischargers to intervene in the
TMDL process to protect their rights. AMSA suggested to the committee staff that TMDLs,as they are
currently applied, might be ripe for legislative action to fix nagging problems such as growth restrictions
and the potential exemption of nonpoint sources. AMSA also requested the Senate's help in securing --
$1.775 million to support the National Biosolids Partnership. Currently AMSA is drafting letters to the
Chairmen of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees— Sen. Christopher Bond (R-Mo.)and
Rep. James Walsh(D-N.Y.)—requesting further federal support for the partnership.
Nationwide Survey Shows Strong Support For Wastewater Funding
The 1999 Rebuild America InGesWcture Survey— released January 27— shows overwhelming support
for federal spending on a wide array,of infrastructure including"transportation, sanitation and water
quality." AMSA is a member of the Rebuild America Coalition, an organization of 60 public and private
groups that are focusing attention at all levels of government on strengthening the nation's infrastructure.
Of those polled,66 percent considered infrastructure spending a`strong investment in America." In fact,
55 percent believes that more federal dollars directed to wastewater agencies would have a"noticeable"
effect on wastewater treatment. The survey supports AMSA's position that more federal money is
necessary to maintain existing wastewater infrastructure and at the same time address the challenges
posed by wet weather in the form of agricultural runoff combined and sanitary sewer overflows(CSOs
and SSOs)and stormwater. It also demonstrates that the public understands the clear connection between
federal dollars and cleaner water. Interestingly, the survey shows public support for watershed-based
clean water regulation. For example, 61 percent favor an approach "that focuses on an overall
coordinated plan that takes into account all environmental concerns"rather than one that`focuses on the
specific, known sources of pollution." The survey suggests that the public would support more federal
money to balance the current ratio of local dollars to federal dollars spent to safeguard water quality. The
write survey is available on the web at hrp.-11 w .rebuildamericaorg.
> Clarification/AMSA's Peak Performance Awards Program(see Member Update 99-1)
Platimurt Awards are presented to member agency facilities who have received Gold Awards for five
consecutive years. According to Board of Directors policy,`the award of Platinum Awards is not rolling.
Upon receipt of a Platinum Award, a facility must receive Gold Awards for the next five consecutive years
to again qualify." We hope this clarifies questions regarding eligibility for Platinum Awards, and we
apologize for any confusion caused by the omission of this information from Member Update 99-1.
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 1 of 16
u � Infrastructure
Updates & Resources
ffr"TIM !„cr
y,r � . Public Awareness Toolkit
. Infrastructure Resources on the Web
. Fact Sheets
. Case Studies & Guides
� . Press Releases
® Infrastructure News Briefs
Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey
Prepared by
The Luntz Research Companies
January 1999
A special thanks to the following organizations
for making the poll possible.'
Bentley Systems Inc.
American Consulting Engineers Council
American Concrete Pavement Association
American Public Works Association
American Road& Transportation Builders Association
Associated General Contractors or America
Construction Industry Manufacturers Association
ancial Guaranty Insurance Company Fin
National Association or Counties
• verview
. And the Walls Come Tumbling Down
. Raindrops Keep Falling
. The Price is Right
. The Little Red Schoolhouse
. The Roads They Travel
. The Urban-Rural Difference
. Party Politics
. Conclusion
. Appendix: Infrastructure's Lighter Side
. Message from Philadelphia Mayor and Rebuild
America Chiarman Edward G. Randall
OVERVIEW
"That mealy-mouthed word, infrastructure. It
sticks to the roof of the mouth like peanut butter
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htm] 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 2 of 16
on while bread. But there is no level of human
concern in America-race, economic fulfillment of
the individual, fairness/equality, social justice,
competitiveness, raising the national spirit and
standards of living-that is not addressed,
attended to, and ameliorated by the contribution
that the infrastructure makes to our well-being."
Jim Lebentha/
Vice-Chair, Rebuild America Coalition
There are five key findings in our study of American
attitudes toward the nation's infrastructure. First and
foremost, with only a few exceptions, public opinion runs
relatively constant across regional lines and in urban,
suburban and rural areas. Americans of all stripes regard
federal spending for the infrastructure as necessary and
important, and they clearly link the quality of the
infrastructure with their own quality of life. They are even
willing to pay more in taxes if that money goes to
improvements in roads, sanitation, water quality, and most
infrastructure projects.
Overall, the population has mixed perceptions of recent
changes in the American infrastructure. In fact, there are
more people who perceive that the conditions of the various
infrastructure components - roads, bridges, mass transit,
airports, school buildings, etc. - have improved over the
past few years than think conditions are worsening. Their
opinions are not unilateral, however, and also indicate the
awareness that much remains to be done. In short, the
public outlook toward the infrastructure is typically
American: hopeful, but aware of the serious challenges that
lie ahead.
AND THE WALLS COME TUMBLING DOWN
A popular misperception is that the American people need
to be convinced that a crisis is just around the corner or that
a disaster is about to occur before they are willing to invest
to fix or prevent the problem. More accurately, Americans
will spend money on improvements or prevention, but only if
they can see the difference with their own eyes.
As we enter the final months of the 20th Century, the public
appears cautiously positive about the various components
that make up America's infrastructure. In fact, in every area
we tested - airports, mass transit, quality of the drinking
water, quality of the rivers and lakes, roads, bridges and
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates- Rebuild America Coalition Page 3 of 16
highways, and public school buildings -a solid majority
either believe conditions have remained constant over the
past five years or so, or even improved.
IS YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE BETTER OFF THAN IT
WAS FIVE YEARS AGO?
Has this element of gotten stayed or gotten
Infrastructure better the same worse
The quality of airport 39% 36% 11%
service
The physical condition of 38°A 28°A 29°�
public school buildings
Your area's roads, 38°A 31°A 30°A
bridges, and highways
Water quality of rivers,
lakes, and coastal areas 26 A 36 A 30
The quality of mass transit 4°A 6% 18°A
Drinking water quality 13°A 1157°A 25%
Your community's 24%
infrastructure
America's infrastructure 35°A 31% 31%
When taken as a whole, Americans are evenly divided over
the direction of the national infrastructure over the past five
years. Just over one-third (35%) believe national conditions
have improved, while just under one-third (31%) consider
conditions to have deteriorated and 31% believe there has
been no change. The numbers are similar when Americans
asked about infrastructure conditions within their own
community over the past five years: 32% better, 24% worse
and 40% about the same.
In this case, there are several stunning demographic
differences:
. "Generation X"Americans are far less likely to
perceive a decline in the national infrastructure or the
infrastructure in their own community than their
parents and grandparents.
. College graduates are far more likely than other
education subgroups to believe infrastructure
conditions nationally are deteriorating. In fact, college
grads are more critical of the national infrastructure
than any other major demographic subgroup in the
survey. They are also more likely than any other
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 4 of 16 ,
education subgroup to believe their own community
infrastructure is worsening, but to a lesser degree.
. A large racial gap exists as well. Whites are narrowly
more likely to believe conditions nationally are getting
worse (32% improving; 35%worsening), while blacks
and Hispanics are overwhelmingly positive (40%
improving; 15% worsening).
. Most significant, there are deep differences by
community. By a 38% to 25% margin, urban dwellers
believe the national infrastructure has worsened over
the past five years. Conversely, 41% of all rural
residents believe infrastructure conditions have
improved, while only 27% believe it has worsened. By
comparison, urban, suburban and rural residents are
all more likely to believe infrastructure conditions in
their own community have improved in recent years.
It is important to note that those who believe America's
infrastructure is improving are more likely than virtually
anyone else to believe infrastructure spending makes a
noticeable impact on the community around them and
represents a strong investment in America. They are
even willing to pay more in personal taxes if the money
goes to specific infrastructure projects.
These findings are unprecedented. For the most part,
Americans are only willing to accept a tax increase if they
believe an issue or problem is worsening. But when that
issue is America's infrastructure, those that are most
satisfied with the current direction of the country are
most willing to spend more.
RAINDROPS KEEP FALLING
Americans are particularly concerned about water
quality. In fact, of all the infrastructure categories we
tested, drinking water quality and the water quality of rivers,
lakes, and coastal areas are the only two categories where
more Americans believe conditions have deteriorated rather
than improved over the past five years.
There are several interesting demographic and geographic
differences here:
. Younger women (who are most likely to have young
children at home) and those from the Midwest are
particularly negative toward the quality of drinking
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 5 of 16
water in their area.
. Older men (who make up a large percentage of
America's fishermen) are far more likely to complain
about the quality of the rivers, lakes and coastal areas
in their area than other Americans.
While these subgroup differences do exist, a consensus
also exists for a combination of"additional federal dollars
and private sector involvement"to address the wastewater
problem. In fact, a majority (55%) believes such a strategy
would have a "noticeable" effect on wastewater treatment.
In this cynical age, where most Americans feel that tax
dollars disappear down a black hole never to be seen
again, this expression of confidence in a
government/private sector partnership to produce
noticeable results is worth making special note of.
It is interesting to note that Americans are evenly split when
asked to assign responsibility for the nation's clean water
programs. Just under half(48%) want the federal
government to assume "more of a primary role,"while 44%
would prefer the states and communities continue to bear
most of the fiscal responsibility-they currently shoulder
90% of the funding burden. In this case, the opinion split is
driven by partisanship:
. Republicans prefer local rather than federal fiscal
responsibility by a 55% to 39% margin;
. Democrats are almost a perfect mirror image - 56%
want the federal government to bear more of the
financial burden for clean water programs, while just
38%feel the matter should continue to be funded by
states and communities.
It is worth noting that a majority of 18-29 year olds say that
the federal government should play more of a role in the
nation's clean water programs rather than turning it over to
the states and communities (by a 53%-43% margin).
Seniors go the other way, favoring states and communities
to the federal government by a slim 46%-43% plurality. How
ironic that the generation that came of age under Ronald
Reagan is more likely to support larger funding
responsibilities for the federal government, whereas the
generation that came of age under Franklin Roosevelt
favors local, community bearing more of a burden.
While Americans may differ in whom they hold accountable
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 6 of 16
for sewage and wastewater, their opinions about the
approach to the issue is clear. By a two-to-one ratio (63% to
31%), Americans favor an approach that "focuses on an
overall coordinated plan that takes into account all
environmental concerns" rather than one that "focuses on
the specific, known sources of pollution." The response was
truly universal, every single subgroup examined supports
the overall coordinated plan concept.
THE PRICE IS RIGHT
"Now is the time to deal with this issue...There
won't be another time...We have to do it
now...We're looking at a $1 trillion surplus..."
Ed Rendell
Mayor of Philadelphia
In this age of cynicism toward Washington, America's
infrastructure is one of the few areas where the public
believes a dollar spent by government is a dollar well
invested.
Most Americans are unwilling to support tax increases for
any reason. There is a universal perception among the
public that they are overtaxed, and that they get far too little
in return for what they send to Washington. The promise to
cut taxes has launched many political careers, while the
suggestion of increasing taxes, even for the best of
reasons, has stopped others dead In their tracks.
Yet fully two-thirds of the population (66%) spread across
all regions and areas of the country describe spending on
America's infrastructure as a "strong investment in
America." By comparison, only 26% of the population
believes "infrastructure dollars disappear once they are
spent." Few government programs can boast of such a high
and consistent level of support across demographic and
regional lines.
There are two additional findings that deserve mention:
. Those whom are better educated are even more likely
to have a favorable outlook toward federal spending
on the infrastructure. Among college graduates, a
sizeable 74% believe infrastructure spending
represents an investment in America, compared to
56% among those without any college education.
http://www.rebuildamerira.org/reports/survey.html 2/17199
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 7 of 16
. Even among those who believe paying off the debt
and tax relief should be higher priorities than
infrastructure improvements, fully 60% believe the
money spent is an investment in America, while only
33% believe the money disappears once it is spent.
It's not just the highly visible infrastructure programs that
hold overwhelming public support for additional investment.
Many programs, such as wastewater removal systems,
have incredibly strong support even though the projects
themselves are never seen.
But it would be inaccurate to say that infrastructure
spending is the lop priority for all Americans. The nation is
evenly divided between those that would use the current
surplus for debt reduction and tax relief(47%) and those
that would rebuild America's infrastructure now (45%).
This was one of the few questions where partisanship came
into play in a major way. By a 53% to 41% margin,
Democrats prefer infrastructure investment to debt
reduction and tax relief. Conversely, by a 58% to 37%
Republicans want tax relief and debt reduction more than
infrastructure investment. Independents, like the nation at
large, were evenly split.
Two other key findings:
. Higher income Americans, those earning more than
$70,000 annually, are among the subgroups most
likely to support infrastructure investment - even
though they stand to gain the most from tax relief. A
comparatively solid 55% back the infrastructure
investment, while only 38% prefer tax relief and debt
reduction.
. Those that believe the quality of life in their own
neighborhoods is getting better are actually more
likely than the population overall to prefer
infrastructure investment (49%) rather than debt and
tax reduction (44%).
The cynicism that poisons so much discussion about
government spending has failed to poison the well of
infrastructure spending.
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 8 of 16
"Would you be willing to pay 1% more in taxes if it meant
you could..."
Very/Somewhat Veil/Somewhat
ghat
Willing
Unwilling
Guarantee a safe
and efficient sewage 74% 21%
and water treatment
system
Have modern
schools with basic
ring to give our 70% 20°G
children computer
access
Have smooth streets 690A 38%
ith no potholes _
dd 50 years of
useful life to local 67% 28%
bridges and tunnels
Have safe, modem 66% 29%
and healthy schools
Eliminate road
congestion in your 62% 33°h
area
Have fish return to 62% 33%
most local waterways
e adable street 35%
signs, we ell
lit streets 59%
Remove litter and 56% 31 7%
graffiti off roads
Improve public 37% 111
transit service levels
ear down and
replace every coal- 49% 43%
Tired, pre-WWII
public school
Have airports that
allow you to take off 40% °
and land on time 50 k
�vherever you fly
Even with the cost factor included, the American people
are prepared to pay more, provided they can get more,
to improve the infrastructure. Of the twelve infrastructure
components we tested, a majority of the public supported a
httpllwww.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htmI 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 9 of 16
tax increase for ten of them, one had plurality support, and
only one (airports) was opposed by the public.
These results are extraordinary. Too often, pollsters will ask
Americans if they support spending initiatives without
mentioning the cost factor, thereby providing their clients
with an inflated sense of support for their priorities. We took
a different approach. Respondents were not asked whether
they would like additional spending for the various
programs. They were not asked whether additional
spending was a good or a bad thing in general. They were
asked whether they themselves would "be willing to spend
1% more per year in taxes if it meant that you could..."The
question was straight and direct, and it elicited a straight
and direct response.
THE LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE
There is clear consensus surrounding the importance of
improving "the infrastructure of education." Given that
education is the Number One issue in America today, this
consensus is not surprising.
What is surprising is that two-thirds of Americans (64%) do
not believe the physical condition of public schools
buildings in their area have worsened over the past five
years, and that a significant percentage of Americans (47%)
believe "their local school buildings are pretty much okay as
they are." By comparison, only 5% believe the schools in
their community need replacement. The remaining
percentage desires either repair or modernization.
Two findings of note:
. The largest demographic difference in attitudes
toward the public school infrastructure is between
youngest and oldest Americans. Almost half(48%) of
18-29 year olds believe that the physical condition of
public school buildings has improved in the past five
years, compared to barely more than one-third of
those age 65 or older.
. There are relatively few differences in attitudes toward
school infrastructure by community. Those who live in
rural neighborhoods are much more likely to believe
the condition of the public school buildings near them
have improved than almost any subgroup we
examined - but that's the only major regional
difference.
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htmi 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 10 of 16 ,
Urban Suburban Rural
Physical condition of
public school buildings
Better 33% 34% 47%
Worse 30% 33% 24%
Desired local school
building improvement
Okay as is 44% 47% 50%
$22 billion for repair of
school buildings
Support 81% 81% 81%
Oppose 16% 12% 14%
Pay more in taxes for 71% 67% 72%
modem school buildings
When asked about the ways to best improve the
infrastructure of education, a clear hierarchy of preferences
emerges, with little variation across demographics. The top
priority of the American people is "ensuring a safe and
healthy place for our children to learn" (49%), followed by
"providing more space to allow for smaller class sizes"
(32%), and "providing wiring to give all children access to
computers and other technology" (15%).
When it comes to the nation's public schools, once again,
Americans are ready to put their money where their mouth
is. When asked to consider a $22 billion/five year spending
proposal to rebuild America's schools, an overwhelming
82% of all Americans favor the measure. And two-thirds of
all Americans would be willing to pay 1% more in taxes to
"ensure we have modern schools that are safe and
healthy."
Modem schools matter to Americans. A full 70% of the
population would be willing to pay an additional 1% in taxes
to provide students with access to computers in the
Cf.:3sroom - that's a remarkable fiscal commitment that is
second only to ensuring the quality of the water we drink.
Taken as a whole, these results conclusively indicate that
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey,html 2/17199
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 11 of 16
Americans are clearly interested in investing in the
infrastructure of education and are prepared to pay for
that investment with their own money.
THE ROADS THEY TRAVEL
Perhaps the most immediate way that Americans come into
"contact"with infrastructure is when they get into their cars
each morning and take to the streets. Whether they live
downtown, or in a sprawling suburb or semi-rural
community, traffic congestion and road quality is an issue
that is increasingly on everyone's mind.
Overall, 38% of all Americans think the roads, bridges, and
highways in their community have improved in recent years;
while 30% say they have gotten worse and 31% have seen
no noticeable change.
There is a significant dichotomy when Americans are asked
to think about "road conditions, traffic, and pedestrians in
your community" and how safe they feel. Rural Americans
feel safer on the streets - but nobody else does.
Not surprisingly, as the subgroup most likely to feel safer on
their streets, rural Americans are the least likely of the three
regions to fork over additional tax money to "eliminate road
congestion" in their community. Fully 68% of the urban
population and 66% of the suburban population would
personally pay more in taxes to eliminate road congestion,
compared to a bare majority of rural residents.
Other findings include:
. On average, 69% of all Americans would be willing to
pay additional tax dollars to "have smooth streets and
no potholes," and urban, suburban and rural dwellers
feel about the same.
. A somewhat less overwhelming 59% are prepared to
pay more to have "readable street signs and well lit
streets." In this case, regional differences were
significant: 65% of urban residents would pay more,
compared to 55% among rural citizens.
. As the chart below illustrates, commitment among the
various demographic segments of the population
depends on the specificity of the issue being
addressed. People are more willing to volunteer their
tax dollars for fixing "potholes and smooth streets"
http://www.rebuildamerira.org/reports/survey.htmi 2117/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 12 of 16 ,
and "adding 50 years to the life of bridges and
tunnels," than when asked to consider the more
generic "road congestion."
THE URBAN - RURAL DIFFERENCE
As mentioned throughout this memo, there is significant
agreement among urban/suburban Americans and their
rural neighbors on a range of infrastructure questions,
including the issue of increased spending. However, certain
differences of opinion and perception do break down along
community lines. The differences are just as worthy of note
as the similarities.
In particular, rural Americans are more likely than their
urban and suburban cousins to feel that the national
infrastructure and the individual components are improving
rather than worsening. The difference is significant: just
25% of urban residents see overall infrastructure conditions
in America improving, compared to 41% among rural
residents. Similarly, rural Americas are more likely to
evaluate the conditions of their roads, bridges and
highways and their public school buildings positively than
almost every other subgroup examined in this survey.
Everyone wants a better infrastructure, and everyone is
willing to pay. But the urbanites are more ready and
more willing. Specifically, the urbanites we surveyed had
higher percentage responses in the following categories:
Total Percentage Percentage of
Issue calling to Support a Urbanites Willing
1%Tax Hike to Support
Removing 56% 74%
graffiti
Replace old
schools
Improve public 68%
transit
Have well lit 11 59% 65°k
streets/signs
And while a clear majority of Americans are willing to cough
up additional tax dollars for the specific purpose of
improving certain aspects of the national infrastructure,
there is consistently a greater intensity of support for
infrastructure investment among urban residents than
their rural counterparts. This finding is important because
hftp://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey-htmi 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 13 of 16
it exists entirely irrespective of other demographics.
In general, it is proper to conclude that while there are
certain differences of perception between urban and rural
residents, these differences are mostly a matter of degree.
Regardless of the demographics considered, Americans
have a remarkably across-the-board outlook on the
questions we asked them to consider in this survey.
PARTY POLITICS
Those who live and work inside the Washington Beltway
may have become accustomed to partisan rancor and
bickering, but there are still a few issues that transcend
party politics. America's infrastructure is one of those
issues. Outside the Beltway, the American people
support government spending on infrastructure,
regardless of party affiliation. The willingness to spend
more tax dollars on infrastructure investment also
transcends party lines, carrying a majority of
Republicans as well as independents and Democratic
support.
In generic terms, two-thirds of Republicans describe
infrastructure spending as a"strong investment in America"
while just 28% describe it as "money that disappears."
Democrats hold identical views: 70% say it is a strong
investment, and 25% describe it as money that disappears.
Republicans, independents, and Democrats alike
equally describe the infrastructure as an important
component in determining the quality of life in their
communities. In fact, 69% of Republicans, 73% of
independents, and 71% of Democrats rate the quality of
infrastructure as either "very" or"extremely important" in
determining their overall satisfaction with the community
they live in. And when evaluating specific infrastructure
changes over the past five years, from road conditions to
drinking water, similarities in results among members of
both parties were more common than differences.
And both parties show a clear willingness to invest more in
specific infrastructure projects. While Democrats are more
likely to spend more money than their Republican
counterparts, support for additional taxpayer dollars for
specific infrastructure does cut across partisan lines.
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 14 of 16
"Would you be willing to pay 1% more in taxes if it
meant you could..."
(those with the greatest% "willing")
j GOP W15ER
(Guarantee a safe and efficient sewage 66°6 75°� 81%
and water treatment system
Have smooth streets with no potholes 65 1% 75%
Have modem schools with basic wiring to 65% 64% 60°k
give our children access to corn uters
dd 50 years of useful life to local bridges 59°h 69°k 769%]
and tunnels
Have modem schools that are safe and 58°6 7°6 73%
healthy
CONCLUSION
The public's perception of progress in fixing, building
and expanding the infrastructure is instrumental to their
continuing willingness to support infrastructure
investment and maintenance.
It is a truism in American politics that nobody knows what
the people want better than the people themselves. Some
might be tempted to make the assumption that infrastructure
is a topic that the American people wouldn't be talking much
about. That it's too esoteric, too remote and technical -that
it wouldn't exactly make up the banter around the dinner
table.
But the results of this survey prove this view completely
wrong. Americans realize that infrastructure is more than an
abstract term. Infrastructure is about the water they drink,
the roads they drive on, and the schools their children
attend. It is about the most basic and important elements of
one's life. And the American people, by an overwhelming
majority, see it as just that: an investment.
In these heady economic times, there is another cynical
force at work: the assumption that people will be interested
only in bettering their own lot, not the lot of their nation.
Again, this survey sets the record straight. Americans are
ready and willing to commit their hard earned dollars to the
continued improvement of their country's vital infrastructure.
Across demographic groups, party affiliations, and the
urban-rural divide, this commitment is remarkably solid.
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 15 of 16
Indeed, infrastructure is an example of increasingly rare
phenomena in our political discourse: something that
practically everybody agrees on. And given Americans'
normally visceral rejection of Uncle Sam dipping further into
their pocketbooks, their readiness to a financial commitment
is that much more notable.
One reason why the infrastructure consensus exists is that
people across America, in small towns, large cities and
expanding suburbs, have been seeing real change - and it
has not been change for the worse. They have been seeing
improvements in some areas -their public transportation
systems, in their roads, bridges, and their highways. And
where they have not been seeing improvement, they at
least see room for it.
The American people do acknowledge the improvements
that have already been achieved in their infrastructure, but
they also believe there are challenges yet to be met -
particularly in areas involving clean water. The people are
ready and anxious to take the next step to improve
conditions around them. Is Washington listening?
APPENDIX: INFRASTRUCTURE'S LIGHTER SIDE
Never put it past Americans to find humor in any situation.
Even on a subject as seemingly esoteric and distant as the
infrastructure, people are willing to laugh and see the
lighter side to the challenges they know we all face. These
questions are meant not only to provide some comic
relief but to strengthen the case for infrastructure
development, with a keen eye to media attention.
. When asked whether they would rather drink city tap
water or cough syrup, "Urban H2O" came in first
(70%) - but an astonishing quarter (24%) of all people
surveyed said they'd rather take the nasty medicine!
. Thinking about a typical visit to the nearest airport, a
quarter (26%) said that "No Way Out" was a more
appropriate movie-title motto for the experience,
compared to the majority (62%)who favored "In and
Out"
. Returning to the theme of schools and their physical
conditions, Americans were asked to pick a "theme
song" - and by just a ten point margin, "Raindrops
Keep Falling on My Head" (39%)was narrowly
http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2117/99
Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 16 of 16 ,
trumped by 'That's the Way I Like It" (49%).
. Perhaps the most stunning result came when
considering the "hot button"topic of water quality.
Nearly a third of all Americans would rather take a
swim in water from their toilet bowl (37%) than from
the nearest river (57%). This perfectly illustrates in a
more visceral way the sense of immediate concern for
the quality and condition of the water supply in
America.
Who We Are— Events— Local Chapters— Infwstrudure &Leoislative
Update
Member Omanizations—Contact Us—Members Onlv— Home
http //www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99
Cause of n
mistaken ga..pYr rs - W IL
R � / ei i
dumping 6
es za, ?�probed
A look at what %ed ~, r RtwRort
may have led to the
a w aua
goof in the Upper New-
port Bay dredging pro-
ject and its potential Audi
consequences. Is dumping site
ends,
By ODWA County SON
The Orange County Register
NEWPORT BEACH—The En-
vironmental Protection Agency
will investigate how, when and
where a subcontractor dumped The Orange Counry Register
600.000 cubic yards of silt and
sediment in the wrong ocean spot ON MFMO S
since the Upper Newport Bay
dredging project started a year The EPA is investigating how
ago a contractor dredging Upper
Human error may be to blame Newport gay dumped
for the wrong coordinates en. 600,000 cubic yards of muck
tered into the Global Positioning in the wrong place in the
System,a navigation tool SolfFlo ocean.Story on Mew t
Partners LP used to locate what
it thought was a federally ap
proved dumping site. ment team for the EPA. "You
Q. Why is the bay being dredged? can go to Costco and buy your
A. The county hired SoliFlo in own handheld GPS."
1997 to clear the bay—a refuge Brusco Barge and Tug, the
for fish and migratory birds — SoliFlo subcontractor hired to
and shares responsibility for the haul the mud out to sea,entered
project with the company and the coordinates.
the state Department of Fish and "They believe they made sort
Game. SoHFlo was hired to re- of an unthinking error when they
move about g00,000 cubic yards first plugged in the coordinates,
of benign sediment from the bay and it stuck." Ross said. "It
with a clamshell dredge si struck for 600,000(cubic)yards.A
The mud and sand accumulates small number difference can add
naturally in the bay,and the area up to thousands of feet."
had not been dredged for a de The Computer has since been
Cade. - reprogrammed and SoliFlo re-
Q. What is a Global Positioning sumed the project.
System?
Q. Will the dumping enor harm
A. GPS is a common navi the mean habitatt
tio l tool that relies on satellites
determine
to determine latitude and longi.
A. The EPA-approved dump
rude coordinates for commermer- ab spot, known as L.A.unlikely
is
vial, military and recreational about ude se et dreg marine
habi.
vessels. The Army Corps of En.tes to include sensitive marine s in-
to the
county
the coordinates tat, Ross said. The agency's in-
to the county and SolDaniel
spokes-
es- vestFlo'igationwit dumping if Soli.
in.cording to Fluor Daniel spokes- clod incorrect dumping site N-
- woman Lisa Boys h duded fish andother
canyons and reefs
"GPS systems have gotten vital m fish and other wildlife.
very cheap and very accurate," The dumping probably will not
said Brian Ross,a me man the affect gray-whale migration,
dredging and sedimentat manage Ross said.
FaxA lent 00V&Aw amsaw'�'�
January 19, 1999
AMSA Briefs Senate Environment & Pahlic Works Committee
Last week, AMSA briefed Senate Environment& Public Works Committee staff on the Association's
legislative priorities for the 106m Congress. While stressing the importance of the Urban Wet Weather
Management Act of 1999, nonpoint source pollution control and stepped up federal funding for CSOs,
SSOs, stormwater and nonpoint source controls, AMSA also informed Senate staff of the Association's
stance on other key issues including TMDLs, Superfund, pretreatment, watershed management, the
Municipal Biological Monitoring Act of 1999 and the Arid West Water Quality Act. AMSA explained to
Senate staff the problems facing wastewater agencies as a result of EPA's current TMDL program and
notified them of the Association's new TMDL guidance encouraging dischargers to intervene in the
TMDL process to protect their rights. AMSA suggested to the committee staff that TMDLs, as they are
currently applied, might be ripe for legislative action to fa nagging problems such as growth restrictions
and the potential exemption of nonpoint sources. AMSA also requested the Senate's help in securing --
$1.775 million to support the National Biosolids Partnership. Currently AMSA is drafting letters to the
Chairmen of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees— Sen. Christopher Bond(R-Mo.)and
Rep. James Walsh(D-N.Y.)—requesting further federal support for the partnership.
Nationwide Survey Shows Strong Support For Wastewater Funding
The 1999 Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey—released January 27— shows overwhelming support
for federal spending on a wide array of infrastructure including"7aztsportation, sanitation and water
quality." AMSA is a member of the Rebuild America Coalition, an organization of 60 public and private
groups that are focusing attention at all levels of government on strengthening the nation's inhastructure.
Of those polled,66 percent considered infrastructure spending a"strong investment in America." In fact,
55 percent believes that more federal dollars directed to wastewater agencies would have a"noticeable"
effect on wastewater treatment. The survey supports AMSA's position that more federal money is
necessary to maintain existing wastewater infrastructure and at the same time address the challenges
posed by wet weather in the form of agricultural mmoft combined and sanitary sewer overflows(CSOs
and SSOs) and stormwater. It also demonstrates that the public understands the clear connection between
federal dollars and cleaner water. Interestingly, the survey shows public support for watershed-based
clean water regulation. For example, 61 percent favor an approach"that focuses on an overall
coordinated plan that takes into account all environmental concerns"rather than one that"focuses on the
specific, known sources of pollution." The survey suggests that the public would support more federal
money to balance the current ratio of local dollars to federal dollars spent to safeguard water quality. The
entire survey is available on the web at hrp.#/ .rebuddamenca.org.
> Clarification/AMSA's Peak Performance Awards Program(see Member Update 99-1)
Platinum Awards are presented to member agency facilities who have received Gold Awards for five
consecutive years. According to Board of Directors policy, "the award of Platinum Awards is not rolling.
Upon receipt of a Platinum Award, a facility must receive Gold Awards for the next five consecutive years
to again qualify." We hope this clarifies questions regarding eligibility for Platinum Awards, and we
apologize for any confusion caused by the omission of this information from Member Update 99-1.
McIntyre, Donald
From: Anderson, Blake
Sent: Tuesday,January 26, 1999 5:32 PM
To: Tuchman, Michelle; Ludwin, David
Cc: McIntyre, Donald
Subject: RE: Public Hearings re Garfield Bridge
They have hearings every night rotating thru the affected cities. They are scoping under the notice of preparation
requirements of CEOA.
-----Original Message.....
From: Tuchman. Michelle
es Sant: Tuday,January 26, 1999 9:26 AM
Ta: Ludwin, D.Ad
Cc: Anderson. Blake;McIntyre, Donald
Subject: Public Hearings to Garfield Bridge
I understand that OCTA is holding public hearings this week on a possible bridge on Garfield. Are we sending anyone to
listen to the comments and find out what OCTA is planning...or is it too early In the process for us?
Michelle Tuchman
Director of Communications
Orange County Sanitation District
714.592-7120 714.962.0356 (fax)
mtuchman@ocsd.com
1
High Court Set filed a e osa-complaint against all water
Dispute Over Rights users from lust upstream of Barstow to the
river's headwaters in the San Bernardino
mounTo Pump Water The'laN$.
The'Physical Solution'
o Hear Case Superior Court Judge E.Mlchael Kaiser
yg 7up/) �g .Goes to High Court responded by freezing litigation m die
01U Water •w• aW matter to allowtudy a special s hyd committee of ex-
nd
L pens to stucti We hash's hydrology aM
ConrinuedAomPapeCAf water production.
"ground subsidence,decreased waler rolled ritehly apportion-
solution-water among Me
sought
quality increased costa to pump from con- to ion's many secs. A er au among ge
By MARC I.IFSHER theunderground
nd increasing depths,capacity.
of Kaisers many users. Afle[a Vial.Judge
svaS neB ric'nardiofT o Cams' farimeIEM Oavnd fit ately.gm plate rage exhaustion of andMe un- Kaiser including
the
the alfalfa
farmers
and
San Bernardino c ties am
farmers and compound
complete exhaustion of the ter denies.Inwho never
the greed t fanners and
its tingover war ,cities are once again Agency
supply: die Mojave Water dairymen Theremin appealed.
objecting
thing to
Clow resource.
my t isregion's
me, the most pre- Agency warns in a legal brief.he IM acre n'sreq irers requirement
that
hatforced them to to ay
thous resource. Only this Clore, the legal four
k enough th rnwater Californiaserve toesneeds oldof afor marketpnces for tan f water consmned
HighDesertls could spread far beyond the typical Southern Cel household for above fixed quotas set by the Mojave Wa.
High Desert region where the dispute be- lwoyealeg ter Agency. In a decision published last
The legal arguments Napan
gem. of extremely"want
to shut
charges. June, the stale Cann of Appeal In San
The to with Mojave Water Agency,a taking thewtte ohm dawn ng to farmers BernardinoTagreedollNthefarmers.
and the
contractor with the Stale Water Project, banner ,- says the Tamers' lawyer,
the laced tit to large number of unreasonably
andthe cities small
Barstow and Hesperia are Rosiness," says the of Ontario.
. High cultural interests
wllWaseprouction and
battling asmall Robert E. Dougherty of Ontario. High cmlurelinterests will cease and
p g group of alfalfa a�north Desert land, without water rights, isn't transfer their base annual production N
producers Irom the Hinkle Valle north the murinpalltles," observed Justice
of Vicmrviile, over the most basic of all aroM diddiy squat:he Says. Thomas Hollenhorst,writing for a=am-
Onthecontrary,farmersam-goingout moos three-member anal. And Me tan
property rights: the ownership of under- and saying.'1've got kinl; f-the-mountain a p
ground water.The contest—which the Cal. pointedlydkregardedlhe fanners'Wston-
ifornia Supreme Court is expected to hear cal"priority water righk,"the panel said.
later this year—could decide just who con- ,' HEfundamen- because the city-dominated drafting cam-
lrols the State's still la unre mitten considered such rights unfair.
ryel Y gm ated But Ignoring Nose historic water
ground-water supplies. tat question is: rights—even to-equitablyapportion water
At stake,says the California Farm But. rights to all producers in an overdraned
Mau Federation, Is the integrity of 150 ..Can someone With a groundwater basin...overlooks well-ser-
years of water-law precedent in a state tied principles of water law,"Justice Hot-
that depends on Irrigation to grow crops on "'— lenhorst wrote.He Concluded that lanners
eight m ,inion acres of otherwise and land. 'historic right to under, have the same rights to pump ground-wo
Any alteration of farmers'historic trailer. -- _ ter as do landowners who take water from
nothing rivers,lakes and streams.
ship of water as"vested property rights," ;.,ground Water pump it Barstow and Its allies have petitioned
the bureau Warns in court documents,"will �___ ____ the state Supreme Court to review the ap-
significantly Impact farmers and ranchers even When doWnstrearn pellate panel's decision—and all parties in
in all parts of the state." thecase are,at the least,collector the high
In terms of water law, "this Is the big '—'—'—"—"— — --- court M make the rules plain.
one," says farm bureau attorney David 'users face Shortfalls? Taking Sides
Guy. "This goes t0 the heart of water Interestingly. Ne settlement imposed
rights.Do they mean anything in the 21st by the Superior Court had been endorsed
century. or can courts just simply appor. water rights.I got mine.and you don't got by the state Department of Fish and Game.
any.-counters the city of Barstow's error- a party in the original lawsuit.That sup
lion water rights away,as they tried to do Day.Arthur G.Kid of costa afesa. port,however,evaporated at the Court of
down there in Mojave?" The battle,the tint ground-water issue Appeal after the farm bureau convinced
Whose Right to Pump? N come before the state Supreme Court In the administration of former Republican
The Supreme Corot case is Bled to 25 years.has been a long time mewing.It Gov. Pete Wilson to back away from the
P ape first bubbled up in the late 1980s.when the case,say attorneys involved I,the mrga-
flddress a lundamentm question about Cal- state Water Resources Comml Board de- lion.Mr.Guy,the farm bureau lawyer.de-
IfOrNO water law:Can someone with a his- med a request from Barstow for authority tars his organization pressured the gover.
toric right to an underground water supply Nrommandeerm...water from upstream noes office.
pump AS much as he or she wants—even wars. Clues, however, now are hoping Nat
when dowrmtreem users, such as rapidly So the city and its water company Democratic Gov.Gray Davis will Duck Me
developing cities.lace potential shortfalls? tumee to the count.In less,they filed suit farm lobby and at least file a friendol-the-
against the Mojave Water Agency.the city court brief backing when users calk for
That is exactly the case in the 3,600-squaw of Adelanm and dozens of upstream water more water.
mile Mojave River basin where the city of Mara,claiming that the defendants were Environmental groups, for now. say
Barstow and Its water supplier, privately continuing to interfere with Barstow's am- they're staying Out of the courtroom fray
held Southern California Water Co.,have far supply. The complaint, flied in River- soil are looking Instead to the state Legjs-
been confronting aworsening"overdraft" side County Superior Court, asked for a long N clarify the ownership."No matter
of available water. writ compelling Me water agency In in- which side wins, the right place, Win.
crease impom from the State Water Pro malely, to get these Issues addressed I,The basfnwide shortfall,which reached crease
mmeafojave SeenmeRW."says Tom Gruff.an aftarney
an estimated one million Bore feet by 1990, River Basin. with Me Environmental Defense Fuld in
threatened the region'r250,000 residents The Mojave hater Agency, in turn. Canons.
Pfense nor to Page CA4,Column J
ueanup vi a for waterways in
]News FGo ie Fnile. _ �c
ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP'.)
ell this way for apartment rental
Wednesday, and vary 20.1999
Cleanup OKd for Waterways in L.A. Area
.Health: Landmark EPA agreement will set pollution limits to make
water safe for people and aquatic life.
By MARU CONE, Times Ena-wonmenia/Writer
n a far-reaching decision that could eventually force
RELATED sweeping lifestyle changes for millions of people, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has agreed to set
O.C.SECTIONS pollution limits that aim to make all beaches and waterways
MAIN PAGE throughout Los Angeles and Ventura counties safe for people
and aquatic life.
NEWS BY The EPA's agreement—which settles a lawsuit filed by the
COMMUNITY environmental groups Heal the Bay and Santa Monica
SPORTS BayKeeper--is considered a momentous event in the decades-
long struggle to clean up Santa Monica Bay and a slew of
PREP SPORTS highly polluted rivers, creeks and lakes. The accord comes after
the EPA for 20 years failed to ensure that the waters were safe
BUSINESS and clean,as mandated by federal law.
SO CAL LIVING Ultimately,said Mark Gold,executive director of Heal the
Bay,the new strategy will guide everything from how
CALENDAR subdivisions are built and streets are cleaned to the quality of
waste discharged by sewage treatment plants.
CALENDAR "This is a very, very far-reaching action.The ramifications
WEEKEND are far beyond setting a number and hoping we reach it," Gold
HOME DESIGN said. "This completely changes the game on how water quality
is regulated."
COMMENTARY The new limits are to be set gradually over 13 years,
7.V.TIMES beginning with one this December. The goal is for beaches and
more than 130 water courses, including the Los Angeles, San
Gabriel and Santa Clara rivers,to be safe for recreation--
swimming,surfing and fishing—as well as protective of
creatures that live there.
ADVERTISEMENT The agreement is not expected to have an immediate effect
on Orange County waterways.
® From lead and copper feces and trash, standards called
"total maximum daily loads" will define precisely how much of
each pollutant a water segment can withstand daily. Cities,
http://www.latimes.comMOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.htmi 1/20N9
uteanup una ror waterways in L.A.Area �s� -�•
industries,sewage treatment plants and other sources that cause
the pollution will be allowed to generate a specific share of that
Jyl�•• total
4 Officials will now be forced to address all the pollution
problems of each watershed as a whole, especially storm water
runoff--the massive volume of oil,metals,bacteria and other
Y/SA debris that flows into rivers and the ocean from streets,
freeways,yards and other urban surfaces. In the past, state
agencies have issued one permit at a time to each industry and
sewage plant and have done little to clean up runoff.
"This is cutting-edge stuff,especially in an urban context,"
said the EPA's regional administrator, Felicia Marcus. "It
means people can look forward to even cleaner waters to enjoy
in the future."
No One Knows What Limits Will Be
The prospect of the unprecedented limits,however,worries
many municipalities, sewage treatment officials and others who
must eventually comply.
A coalition of county and city sanitation districts plans to
file a motion this week in federal court to intervene and block
the agreement.
The overriding concern is the uncertainty—no ones knows
what the limits will be,what it could cost to comply,and
whether there are any viable solutions to reduce the
contamination,said Sharon Green, government affairs analyst
of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts.
"We hope it will lead to water quality improvements,but
we're concerned about it leading to requirements that simply
cannot be met or that will require costly treatment," she said.
Los Angeles Councilwoman Ruth Galanter plans to ask the
council today to "bless the agreement" and refuse to let the city
participate in legal challenges.
"Cleaner water means improved quality of life,not only for
the people who live here but those who visit here," she said. "It
would send a really terrible message for the city to mm around
and say we don't care about clean water."
State Officials Expected to Set Standards
The task is gargantuan--assigning about 750 specific
pollution limits--but EPA officials agreed to deadlines that will
be phased in through 2011. The beaches,Malibu Creek and the
Los Angeles River will be among the first to be tackled.
State water quality officials are expected to set the limits,
but the EPA will oversee the procedure. The deadlines,
however,are only for when the limits will be set,not when
they will be complied with--which could take years longer.
"This is a road map that gets us to clean water," said David
Beckman,a Natural Resources Defense Council attorney who
represented the environmentalists. "It's not the end, but it's the
beginning of the end."
Dennis Dickerson,executive officer of the state's Regional
Water Quality Board for the two counties,called the new
approach "a very essential way to go."
"We generally see this as a very positive development," he
said. The limits "are very labor-intensive and rather an arduous
process,but we are very committed to doing them and we
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.html 1/20/99
�iewwp vnu iur w au rwaya in ar.r,.. ca
intend to make them work."
The Clean Water Act required the pollution limits to be set
by 1979 for all waters in the United States that are considered
unsafe for people and aquatic life.
But 20 years past that deadline,the EPA and the state have
not set a single limit for any of the 156 water body segments
that are polluted in Los Angeles and Ventura counties.
Beckman said the EPA "did absolutely nothing" on that issue.
EPA officials say they failed to set the limits because they
wanted to first address the nation's most pressing water
pollution problems--through two decades of costly and
controversial cleanup at sewage treatment plants and industries
across the country.
Now that those threats are largely resolved,regional EPA
administrator Marcus said, it is time to address the multitude of
sources--especially urban streets—that are still keeping so many
waters unsafe.
"Times have changed,and watershed planning is now the
way to go," she said. "It would have been hard to do this the
right way 20 years ago,but people now are ready to do it."
Even though thousands of U.S.waterways violate the Clean
Water Act,only a scattering of limits have been set elsewhere
in the country,including Oregon and Georgia. Southern
California lags behind largely because of the enormity of
dealing with urban waters contaminated by bacteria-laden
street runoff from millions of people.
Los Angeles and Ventura counties "are not alone. Many -
other states and most of California have not pursued" the
limits,water board official Dickerson said.
Environmentalists have filed similar lawsuits in 29 other
states, including 12 where the EPA faces a court order to
develop the permits,Beckman said.
Beaches in much of Los Angeles County are frequently
closed to swimming because of fecal waste from runoff.A few
years ago, a USC study showed that people who swim at
beaches new storm drains have a nearly 50%increase in colds,
diarrhea and other illnesses soon after swimming.
The government has less than three years to set the pollution
limits that aim to make beaches in Los Angeles County safe for
swimming, and less than four years for Ventura County. About
100 cities contribute to the coliform bacteria count--a sign of
human or animal waste in runoff.
The most challenging part of all the new limits will be the
bacteria and viruses at beaches because no one knows where,
precisely,they come from. This also is one of the most critical
aspects of the cleanup because polluted beaches have a big
impact on public health and the local economy.
But there is far more than the ocean at stake.About 130
urban rivers, creeks, lakes and other waters in the two counties
contain excessive amounts of some form of pollution that
makes them unsafe for swimming,fishing or aquatic life.
The new strategy means divvying up the pollution load.
Cleaning up the contamination will now become more like the
region's program to clean up smog--a certain level of pollution
is deemed healthful,then officials regulate virtually everything
that contributes.
For example, Ballona Creek,which flows from downtown
http://www.tatimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000006013.html 1120/99
l Leanup Vnu Aur waterway) In L.A.tuna rage Y ui M
Los Angeles to the ocean at Marina del Rey,contains
hazardous amounts of zinc,copper,lead and three other metals. '
Under the agreement,a maximum will be set by late 2003 for
each pollutant and specific allocations will be made for each of
the various industries, Los Angeles County and the four cities
of Los Angeles,Culver City, West Hollywood and Beverly
Hills.
At Malibu Creek,a limit will be set by December 2001 for
algae-creating nutrients such as nitrogen that come from
sewage and fertilizer. Cities and grazing operations upstream
will be allocated certain shares.
In Ventura County,Calleguas Creek is a highly
contaminated waterway containing metals,pesticides and other
compounds. An overall limit will be set for each one, and then
allocations will be made to the upstream farms,cities,sewage
treatment plants and industries.
Deal May Ease Load on Some Polluters
Controversies and legal challenges are bound to erupt over
how the state or EPA sets the individual limits. However,the
new strategy might actually ease the burden on polluters,called
point sources,that have already been highly regulated--such as
the Chevron oil refinery in El Segundo and sewage treatment
plants. Instead,more of the burden might be put on cities and
agriculture.
"It means finally there will be an equitable distribution,a
responsibility that matches contribution," Beckman said.
But Green of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
worries that much of the burden could still fall on the sewage
treatment plants because it will be too complicated to deal with
urban runoff that comes from all over the region.
Environmentalists wanted nearer deadlines,but they said
those in the agreement were the best they could negotiate with
the EPA because of limits on government resources.
Cop ry ight 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,WATER POLLUTION
POLLUTION C NTROL,OCEAN POLLUI ION,HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS--DISPOSAL,GOVERNMENT REGULATI N
UTILITIES—ORANGE COUNTY. YOU will not be charg to look for
stories,only to retrieve one.
(Iwa
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.html 1/20/99
1�{�iz1Jl Ate•. ,r . Thursday,Jafwery 2H,19B9
.;
Future watet' demand may result in loss of farmland
No Ram's pop algllonis forend .exisig water acme a% which has PoW a water use and supplies In that County wig see a shorlege by 2020. cvltmer. �
to double 2M fa IA �. farmem worried state by 2020. The rest of the state, howeve; is Water wont be diverted from
h1 ty 9 Arens with water accent will be In Statewide. D Wulabon is expected expwtedtobreak even , adds W tandea Pe1M; hoes and
oroom; n wnYl acem. demand for housing and Industry, to increase from M I million in 19M New water supplies are essential, Industry wm take over famlmd ni ri
and farmland meets dud pmfdc,said to v.6mmion in 2o2o. C ettol said but the area wont see pop ilatlen in search of areas soM5
ByWFl•IDYOWEN vneetsnd farm eryerta But the populations m Kern and than by 20P.0. water moves is
rue ta,aet.,er Moment woriiea®me alter learn- sdlerent coumiea to the south, San TM tine to develop these new . itettol predicted an,lrpdsi08'�'
emr:veaevaa.aayieuaom mg about the Mace ofwater during a Bernardino and Riverside, are waersuppars isyestaday,'he said because ofthe lark of water at 20,
Kern Candi'a Population tr pro- dlpctvsion Wednesday of a state expected to take the brunt of the CrMDI said he-is hustrated with and it will be rvsalved in the vbthl
jeted to double to about L2 million water plan by Jeanine Jones, chid increase with 100 percent mare peo- den bickering'going on between the booth through legislation or pup
M,� means WOOD mare people water planner for the California ple - groups waking on developing new urban candidates- s
apartmentofwaLwHes mcm Ton depasssW and ran Ctutol, ware sources;— agriculture, tndus• 'In shout we will low he'�•
will rwed water to&A soak their Jones gave anoverv1ew of sine Cali- president of the Kem County pbrm try,urban ande nimnmerM groups. Meertrng to the Mmers,who will.ba
lawns,aashtheir lsandry,rake show, foda Were Plan to the water Asa, Bureau 'Nothing is being aocomDtidud,' vastly outnumbered by urban
era and Bush theirta0es lotion of Kern County In BakeraLdd Projections show the water region M sud.'Wbere are you going W get dwellers
It also manna an eta disin on The CaliforniaWater Plan •. �;". predicts aovoing the western half of Kam the wale wlthnnm taking LLfromagd- PYlw anYaU1B/p
i
WATER: califon-da wilflose 300,000 acres of no land
COMM hMA1 Water Asacclaaon of Kem County, hopes the groups can resolve their
Rurn Bureau Executive Director dtdnt take such a dim view of the issues bemuse the loss of lmrrdand in
iron Hudgengnxd , Nhme Kem Count ave y would h farreactung
'Somethings.going to give and Its He believes the new water supplies effedsto she rest of the nation.
probably going to be ag,'he acrid will Bow on time. Kern County is a top supplier of
The-plan sinews California losing Tm a httie more optimistic than many IMM nuts and vegetables to
Wool) saes of bvgatrd ag land to Jim(GMWQordiat,'hesatd US.and oversaasmarkets.
residential and tachua •growth. - • Ke=,TuIme and Rag Gulch Water But m the longrem,.he said The
Gwe- l.undgmst, widen[ of the Districts manager B*SDwes said he urban§gathevotes.' {)
� 1
O.C. water projects included
in Clinton's proposed budget
POLITICS: $1.5 million letting it seep into the grbundwa-
1D tDlldln would be a ter supply so it eventually be
g used far drinking and other uses.
boost to reclamation - .It's a significant victory in
getting the water reclamation
Plan• project under way,"mid Lee Go,
By NWtiiN WISCKtx down, chief of staff for Rep. Lo-
The Orange County Register retta Sanchez, D-Santa Ma.
Orange County water-related Other water projects include:
projects received a boost from ►The San Juan Creek water-
°a President Clinton's proposed shed would receive $414,000 to
• budget, with-a total of S25.7 mil- study how to stabilize erosion,
lion set aside. prevent flooding and restore the
The biggest of these—$20 mil- natural habitat.
-` lion for the Seven Oaks Dam ►Newport Bay would receive i
flood control project in the San $240,000 for dredging and mainte-
Bernardino portion of the Santa aspen. 1
.� Ma River — was identified im. _ ►The Allan Creek watershed
'tnediately when Clinton's budget would receive $161,000 to study
.was released Monday. M addi- how to stabilize erosion,prevent
tional $3 million for the opera- flooding and restore the natural
dons of the Prado and Seven habitat. , .
Oaks dams was anticipated. • ►The San Diego Creek,, - ,
But the additional$2.65 million g
An water projects was not found feeds into the upper Newport
by local Congress members until . Bay,would get$140,000 for study
h'uesday. -....on how to stabilize the creek and
. The biggest chunk of Toes- reduce the amount of sediment
day's findings was S1.S million being carried into the c eek::.
toward the $240 million.Orange I-The Santa Ana,Rlyer basin in
County-Regional States%Recla-,i Orange County would :: get
Snation Project.The project calla S100,000 to study how to further
for taking -highly purified improve it, and portiois up.
,wastewater, shipping it to is re- stream of Orange County would
?charge basin in Anaheim, hod get another S100,000 for study.`
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
PUBLIC A"Alfts C rMlctl
A1WD PUBLICATION San Diego union-Tribune
eaemoPanranuzrfs oamtaorsoursenN uuroaN" DATc January 13 , 1999
S R"s toilet-to-tap water plan
should halt, science board says
By Kathryn Balint drys sewers. The project, which was concep.
rruv wsrrea ]¢stead of mm8 the purified sew-
The cityof San Diego's plan to a e water for drimldn , the hood really approved by the state Da"
g g partment of Health Services.wddld
turn sewage water into drinking suggests in its report that the dry be the brat of its kind in California
water has elicited widely divergent use it for landscaping and industrial and only the second in the nation.
views, not just from ordinary citi- uses. The dry has already spent Cg
was but from scientists,engineers Board member William Nieren- million in research on the projedE
and other experts as well. burg. former director of Scripps But last month, Mayor Susan G&
Four months ago. a'blue-nbbon Institution of Oceanography, said ding announced her opposition to it,
panel of experts" from across the the dry should be commended for Citing concerns about its safetyV4
country,assembled by the National pursuing the project, and that he its cast,she said she would not.put
Water Resources Institute, can- doesn't want to see the city stop it on the City Cound's agenda,tthhus
eluded that the citys project would recycling waste water altogether. blocking a vote and prohibiting'fbe
be"safe and appropriate." He said it is appropriate to use project from being built while shell
Yesterday, a panel of local ex- recycled waste water for irrigation in office.
perts—with credentials equally as or industrial use. Siam then, David Schlesinger;
impressive as the blue-ribbon panel The Science Advisory Board, director of the wastewater depart-
-disagreed. which studied the city's sewage pu- meet. said work on the project has
The county's Science Advisory nficatioa plans for almost a year, been stopped.
Board, in putting the finishing tou- makes recommendations to the It appears now that theproje".
ches on its report, said it isn't can- county Board of Supervisors. The all but dead. —'
vinced that the city's $154 million notion of purifying sewage,howev- The City Council's Natural Re-
purification project would be safe. er,came mot from the county board, sources and Culture Committee.
The sevem members of the board but from the city of San Diego s which initially had been scheduled
who attended yesterday's meeting Metropolitan Wastewater Depart- to discuss the project next w"K
agreed that the project should not meat has rescheduled that meeting 4s
proceed. They said long-term epi- As the project is envisioned,sew- March 10. ^^
demiolegical studies and a surveil- age would undergo multiple treat-
bnm of potential health effects mums, then be piped to the San Schlesinger said that,despite the
must be conducted'to reassure the Vicente Reservoir southeast of Po- county Seamm Advisory Board's
people of San Diego that there is no way.There,the purified waste wa- opinion,be still firmly believes that
health harard.' ter would min with raw drinking the purified sewage water wouldbe
"What we are worried about here water from the Colorado River and sale for drinking. He said he hopes
is the production and use of new other sources, then be treated to obtain the council's permissibfi
chemicals;said board member S.S. again using conventional water to release to the public the volumi-
Penner, director emeritus of the treatment,before flowing from the nous environmental documents
Center for Energy sod Combustion faucen of San Diegans that the city has prepared to shtn
Research at the University of Cali- Waste-water officials had hoped that the project would pose no mare
fornia San Diego. to have the project operating by of a health risk than the city's cur-
He and other panelists expressed 2002. rent drinking water supply-
women that toxic or potentially
harmful wastes flushed into the
sewers by the biotech industry
weld escape the multiple water
treatment processes proposed by
the dry and end up in the drinking
water supply.
But the panel said it didn't want
to single out biotechnology re-
search companies because there
are others,such as pesticide users,
that also discharge potentially
harmful contaminants into the
Around Town
Valley Voices
What's your most romantic fantasy date?
Go on an Watch a sunset Fly to Paris
evening cruise ��rr in Maui with and go to
in Mauna Lani, `f ^• 4' actress Nikki dinner on a
Hawaii with I ilk Taylor. boat cruise
my husband. y �' Minh Dan ® with my
Carol husband.
Glover Sue
Borkchardt
�t
Have dinner Ride the Go on a picnic
and see a Amtrak to San alone with my
movie with Juan boyfriend to
singer Capistrano the beach.
Courtney �, with my it.
Cristina
Love. and have r Tobler
Jim Cerda �.. dinner by
candlelight in
a restaurant
that has a
1 piano player.
Frank Smith
Have actor Take my Spend two
Antonio nancee to Big _ nights with my
Sabato Jr.pick Bear,have ifeon
me up in a dinner,sit by sy Catalina in a
limo,spread r' the fire and _ room with no
roses at my -• watch the telephone,
feet and then movie,"The television, ` 'ii
ny me to Paris Greatest Love radio or
for dinner and Story Ever <� agendas to
walk under the Told." read. -
stars. Lawrence John Collins
Vivi Boang Reyes Mayor
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
11 Name of Paper Section I Page # Date Subject
The A l-Ria Se a /�Da
Today, Ivangorod confronts a modest The Estonian government, which has
Two Towns Fight but subversive Challenge from ac ors the forkedoutcashin thepasttofootpartoflvan-
g icy water.Its fce doesn't want territory.It gorod's sewage and water bill.a now consul-
TT1�� just wants Russia to pay its bills. ering further -humanitarian aid" to again
1_/Znyr ¢rid a River Like most Russian towns,Ivangorod is help thhR headquarters Iowa
rs Cover Axrvmentfees.hie
broke.Anywhere else in Russia,this would once-shared water utility, director t.the
Runs Through It hardly mamer.The Country shrugs off debt Era keeps Ivangorod'swater
unpaid bills in a
sel
s and lives on barter.But Ivangorod (which bulging purple folder. They total S1.3 mil-
mean's Ivan's Town in Russian) has a lion.'They are definitely ourmost difficult
Russians Can't Pay the Tab. problem: It buys its water from Estonia customers.-he groans.
Estonians Turn Off the Tap; and processes its sewage across the bor- Mr.En started to get heavy last tanu-
P der,too.And there they want cash. ary. He cut water supplies by half. Ivan-
"They begged me to turn the tap back gpypd quickly coughed up some cash and
Sewage Is Sweet Revenge
on.' says Narva's acting mayor,Ants I.A. got its water back.When payments again
tmers.the man Ms.KoStIMMa bad pleaded dried up, Mr. Era again closed the tap
By A.NDnew HlnGma with by telephone.-They think this is polit-
Smj)nepaeVra/Tpc W S,tc,J...pw ical.But it a a very simple economic prob- a FlNIANO
IVANGOROD, Russia—Under threat lem.We aren't Communists here anymore. wins _
from implacable forces across the river,of. R you don't pay,you don't get." The dis.
ficials in this decrepit Russian border town pure,he says.is a"clash of two systems.' haaaoroe
huddled in a snowy wood on New Year's Indeed,the tale of the two cities traces
Eve fortifying their feeble defenses. In a the divergent paths taken since the bridge xana e
last-ditch plea for mercy, Deputy Mayor between them became a noDdlii border °tannic 2'
Antonina Kostitsina tracked down the en- post back in 1991. Under the Soviet Union.
emy on his mobile telephone."I begged for they were inseparable, sharing water. ESTONIA
the whole town," she says. 1 pleaded, buses. fire trucks and even cemeteries. c,a. Itc
'Please,please give us more time."' Their schools played each other in ice pupas
She was mid it was already too late. hockey. Everyone spoke Russian. More
On the other side of the river, a work- than 1.000 Ivangorod residents, including
man clambered down a rusty ladder into Ms.Kostituna,worked in Narva. uryIA
an underground cavern in me Estonian The two towm5 still speak Russian—most
town of Narva. There.with a quick heave residents in both are ethnic Russians—but
on a big metal wheel, he put an end to now belong m different countries, and dif- - 'sweo_'•
months of baggling—and to Ivangorod's ferent worlds. Russia's economy shrank - r
water supply. 3.3,in the first nine months of last year.Es- '•9xs'JAr Fin D,�
Authorities on the Russian side retali- tonia's grew by 5.6<<. Russia courts Serbia I - a
ated swiftly. Ivangorod's mayor told mu- and Iraq as friends. Estonia wants to join 1 R09SIA
mcipal workers to open a sluice gate.send- NATO and the European Union.
mg thousands of gallons of sewage cascad- When the Soviet Union perished.Narva's asnuAx+
mg through an underground pipe into the 80,090 people got the water and sew agrrreat-
Narva River. From watchtowers on oppo, ment systems tThev also got the best fire 9aAmR
site banks, Russian and Estonian border trucks, leaving their neighbors unable to UND
me PO
guards now survey the slimy slick through I reach names higher than the fourth noor.l V D[kxwry laruiNE
binoculars, a fast current sweeping the Ivangorod got three big crumbling factories.
muck off toward the Baltic Sea after it but, only one of which,a former graphic-machur
byes to the surface.Gulls peck at sewage- ery plant,snit produces.It now makes unr hallway.Again Ivangorod Scraped together
stained ice frozen along the edges. brenas and cheap knickknacks. some money—or said it did:The funds van-
Ms. Kostitsina went on local television The withering of Ivangorod's economy abed in the rubble of Russia's banking sys-
to explain why trips had gone dry and toap- rant all bad:At least its sewage is less haz- tem after the country's August financial
peal for calm.Hung over and dry-mouthed ardour.-We are only dumping fecal mater blowout.The ruble's demise added further
alter days of holiday revelry, many of ial.not industrial waste."says the mayor. woe.Estonia demands payment in its own
lvangurod'a 12.000 residents were gasping Anatoly Polapov. "Basically our factories more-solid currency,the kroon.Mr.Era or.
for water."It was not pretty."she says. don't work anymore.' Environmentalists dered his workmen to cut water by io"c-
For centuries, Ivangorod and Name warn that the damage could still be serious.
,lowered at each other across the river, How bad won't be known until ice now Please Dim to Pnge AIY,Column I
each bank dominated by an imposing stone shielding the river banks melts—and swim-
'ortress.In the past,Russia has worn down men return to beaches downstream.
each of its rivals,from the Danes who built Mr.Potapov says he can't afford Narva's
i castle in Narva in the 13th century to the rates for sewage treatment and has `no
Nazis who staged a ferocious last stand other exit'but to pour waste into the river.
here in 1945. He hopes the mess will awaken Moscow to
his town's economic plight and boost miserly
federal funding.More than 400.000 gallons of
slop from sills and toilets now drain each
day into the waterway.Mr.Potapov says it
is not that much really." but he worries
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # I Date I Subject
Estonian and Russian Towns Fight Dirty
Continued Flmm First Page
Just after Christmas,Ivangorod got a fi- spent three days in jail after threatening to
nal ultimatum:Pay up or slake its thirst by block a railway line in protest. "I'd say
itself(Estonians who don't pay get cut off, about half the people here would like to join
too).Ivangorod decided to go it alone,mobi- with Estonia now,"Mr.Gordeyev says."in
Nixing money and municipal workers for a a year,it will be over 90%."
frantic welf-digging drive amid birch and Russian nationalists are appalled.
pine trees outside town.Officials spent New Vastly Vdiwin.an Ivangorod businessman
Year's Day shivering in the snow,supervis. and head of the local branch of Mr.Zhiri.
ing the jury-rigged emergency water sys- novsky's Liberal Democratic Party, says
tem. (The town started the system years Russia has more potent weapons than
. ago but gave up when promised funding sewage. "They spoiled our holiday. We
from Moscow dried up.)meal civ"efense can do the same tothem,"he says.He sug.
units went on alert. FSremen practiced gests that Ivangorod drain a reservoir
drills fetching water from the river. The St2tldling the border, a move that would
pumps now splutter and groan and provide I
ermltc mppbes for three or four days a sabotage a big Estonian power plant.
week. But even Mr. Vdovin admits that life
Nonetheless, Mr. Potapov, the mayor, across the bridge is better.A milk chum,
still prefers to sleep in a hotel equipped with plastic canisters and buckets filled with
its own pump. His family stays in St. Pe- water clutter his apartment.He fills them
tersburg.His deputy,Ms.Kostitsina.scur- atnlght froma lapoutside.Hesayshegoes
ries about with buckets, stockpiling water out in the dark to avoid being seen by an-
to cover days when taps yield only air.The water war has domed the embers of wiry neighbors: as a member of the local
a more serious conflict. When the Soviet council.he worries they might blame him
Union fell apart, many of Narva's mostly for across
the
thirstiness. Looking from wistfully
Russian population felt marmned.Loyal to across the river toward Narva from his
Moscow,not the Estonian capitalotTWlmn, ninth-floor apartment, he says: "Over
they lobbied for autonomy.Vladimir Zion- there is Europe.Here we are in—to tell the
novsky. Russia's eccentric nationalist truth.I'm not sure where Russia 6:
politician.demanded that Narva be handed
over to Russia and, to enforce the claim,
proposed setting up big fans to blow ra-
dioactive waste across the Baltics.
Today.Narva's Russians complain about
having to team Estonian before they can be-
cane full citizens.Bat they count their hless-
in gs—salaries and pensions paid on time and
well-tended streets.Many still shop in Ivan-
gorod. where bread and sausage are
cheaper,but curse Russia for reneging on its
debts and fouling the river.An informal stir
Vey by Narva's main newspaper fond over
whelming sympathy for Mr. Rri's hardball
tactics.
"The tea is definitely sweeter on this
side of the river.we all admit that,"says
Vladimir Chuikin, a former head of the
Narva city council and leader of a now-
abandoned campaign to integrate more
closely with Russia.
Meanwhile.many in Ivangorod lament
being stuck in Russia.Yuri Gordeyev,a re-
tired Russian sailor, has even launched a
quixotic campaign to secede and merge
with Estonia. He collected 502 signatures
on a petition calling for a referendum and
I VVN1Nl\ Y(fLYY♦
ewS G 1 n ex GO
Y ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP`
+ : :n - :'1 Cam An¢eiro dimes
"{ Tormented > Calendar
` souls and... �l; �.I -
Monday,Tuary 25,1999
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
By LM CH1U, (714)965-7172
he Orange County Water District recently received an
RELATED 13 AA rating from Standard and Poor's, an international
O.C.SECTIONS bond-rating organization and business information
service. The designation makes the district one of the three
MAIN PAGE water organizations in the state to hold such a rating.
The district first earned the AA rating in 1994 because of its
NNEWS BY competitive water rates and ability to easily get loans when
COMMUNITY needed,as well as its strong service to the area economy.
SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREPSPORTS
BUSINESS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT,BONDS STANDARD&
SO CAL LIVING POOR'S CORP CREDIT RATINGS.You will not be charg�k for
stories,only to retrieve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMEM
News
Prestigious
V SA
http://www.latimes.comfHOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000007559.1.html 1/25/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register
Oil companies sued
over water pollution
An environmental organiza-
tion sued ra ail companies for
billions of dollars Tuesday,ac-
cusing them of polluting sources
of California's drinking water
with toxic leaks from refineries,
pipelines and storage tanks.
—Communities for a Better En-
vironment also contends that
state water boards stood idly by
as ground water was contami-
noted by benzene and toluene
from 3,500 sites, some in every
county of the state. The Superi-
or Court suit targets only the oil
companies and does not name
state officials or the gas sta-
tions where most of the storage
tanks are located.
Tuesday's suit accuses the
companies of violating Proposi-
tion 65, California's 114M initia-
tive that prohibited discharging
substances that cause cancer or
birth defects into drinking wa-
ter.
Benzene and toluene are both
known to cause cancer. A sepa-
rate CBE suit, filed in Superior
Court last year,accuses eight
oil companies of contaminating
ground water with the gasoline
additive MTBE, a possible car-
cinogen.
ews � �o Ie n ex co
t ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP
J
ues ay, January
COSTA MESA
By FUSE GEE, (949)574.4275
he City Council recently discussed the possibility of
RELATED giving waste haulers in danger of losing their operating
permits more time to fix violations.
.C.-SECTIONS The proposal comes in anticipation of a state deadline that
NEWS BY requires cities to recycle 50%of their waste before December
COMMUNITY 2000 or face potential fines of as much as $10,000 a day,city
officials said. Costa Mesa places several conditions on waste
SPORTS haulers, including a requirement that each divert 50%of its
PREP SPORTS waste by 2000 or face possible permit revocation.
The amendment would give haulers more time to comply
BUSINESS and thus avoid possible shutdowns of service.None of the
waste haulers present at the council meeting directly opposed
LIFE&STYLE the change, which would give a hauler 100 days to comply
CALENDAR rather than 10. Some,however,raised concerns about meeting
the 50%diversion rate.
CALENDAR
WEEKEND Coovriaht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
HOME DESIGN
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
COMMENTARY COSTA MESA(CA)---•CONTRACTS,RUBBISH COLLECTION
PERMITS, RECYCLING.You will not be charged to look for stories,only
T.V.TIMES to retrieve one.
ADVERTISEMENT
• 2 for t miles for
qualifying
Balance Transfer.
NextCard Y/�S4
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NE WS/ORANGE/OCNEW S/t000005653.1.html 1/19/99
Petitioners target
retention of ci
' treatment D4 Friday,Jam 1, 1999 •
said. create lower overall cons."
Gross womed Sewer City nosh service and Imdscaph p "There is a reasonable rhma
privatization thatthe yt� could slow thingsfor emmple, ate already prisms a
Good ..d from Bl have cut costs significantly,accordi
would bum The and privatization effort, to Aleshi[e
P _ tilled Save Om Sewn,u led by hemenly denied that The dry=may said oppoamrs
up sewer rates activist Jim Jong and support- ,ape would have to be nun to privatization have a double sus
m mdude formerMayor Frank increase roan for citizens." dard.
Bogor.Theywant a ballot mea- City Manager Rob Parkins wn- "People talk about govemmem b
BY MICBEI.E CLACK sure that would prohibit the dry cumed,saying rate control will be m ing inefficient,buthae,the atgume
AND JENNIFER LEmum from selling or leasing the my future contract is tamed on its head," he said
txs smear svu sewage plant to my private firm,
PALM SPRINGS — A Soup of add a rate assessment to utility �i��ofwn charge,
the private t- criticism of privatization. "ALL inc
Palm Springs residents fearful of men based on actual cost of public sector n m the cit "rote set- cation art that the tit an tmdn a
higher sewage rota is stepping sewage treatment and stop the still will be done by the city,"he said, with cry management on this andt
P hoping to quell one obvious fear that privatization,the citizens actually a
up efforts to collect signatures ace of sewage plant doHms for has motivated the petition. protected."
on a petition to prevent trans- other purposes. Parkin went even further, saying And, he said, the bidding pence
fetring operation of the tity's Jones said the group bas and the shift m move much of the rity's has actually opined the doorto a for
wastewater treatment plant to a the and of Jmmxy to collect business m the private sector is a needed review of the drys eaimr
private company. 3,500 signatures. move toward"innovation,and borer rate structure.
But for the group to succeed in Supporters with petition are managemm4 which in ram would "It makes me nervous that a
seeing that the facility's fire be posted outside area grocery
decidedbyvoten,ithacroover- stores and post offices. Their
come a derision already made biggest hurdle, though, is get- haven't looked at it in so long," t
by the Gry Council. ting the publiNs understanding said. "Thar is part of what we a
That appears unlikely as my of the issue,Jones said. trying m dean up in this process.U
officials say they are planning to SOS volunteer A4 A. Toma- ate nymg to pm together a peckzf
decide by the and ofnex[month sevic, who was collecting sig- that wben all is said and done is legs
berweentwofirms—Colorado- manes outside a Palm Springs no jump in rates._"
based OMI and U.S. Filter of shopping center recently, The Desert Water. Agency, wh
Palm Desert—bidding to take summed up the groups point of Aleshire said was cm out of th
over operation of the plant view simply. bidding process early became of it
"Certainly,the track the city is "Iris petition is a valuable bid was,too low,will continue to ge
on,the city mtmds to move on tool that could give taxpayers an allotted share of reclaimed wow
this process and I think it will and residents of Palm Springs he said.
come to fruition very quickly," lower sewer mtes and mote But he noted that the bidding an.
Gry Anomey David Aleshbe money in their pockets." comma process can drag on and it i
said Thursday. Palm Springs resident Karen feasible that petitioners could haw:
But he acknowledged that the Tabbah said she is against pri- shot at putting their measure on .
petitioners' could influence the vatization because she has a ballot before thm
process. problem with the idea of for- But once a connect for privet,
"Certainly doing the petitim profit ownership. - operation is signed,Aleshhe said,th,
can create a political event that sTF profit must mean the deal cannot be broken until the wn
makes the council aware of the prices will go up 'in order m tract cspims.
controversy over the issue. We make a profit,"she said.-
have had people come down to Mayor WillKleindierut ve-
the meetings and express con- i Please see SEWER,B4
ews - �x = ce
71 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP
rw Moms Sbcee
Tormented Calendar
souls and...
a iP .
Monday, eF—bruary fl9TS4
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
By LISA CHIU, (714)965.7172
he Orange County Water District has announced plans to
RELATED pay $1.5 million for 10,000 acre-feet of high-quality
O.C.SE TIC 101 S— �'OU°d water from San Bernardino County. The water,
enough to satisfy 20,000 average-sized families for a year, will
NEWS BY be transported from San Bernardino County to the Orange
COMMUNITY County ground-water basin for a year,and may be renewed in
the future,district officials said.
SPORTS
PREP SPORTS (Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
BUSINESS b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
LIFE&STYLE WATER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT.You will not be
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
i$aWn
NextCard Ve/SQ
Online Balance
Transfers.
2.9% intro APR.
http://www.l at imes.com/HOMEINE W S/ORANGE/OCNE W S/t000009847.1.html 2/1/99
ews
s r ORANGE COUNTY C NMUNITIES HELP
WThe University r . BA A
Alliance, MI. • CIS
Friday, Janes
GARDEN GROVE
ByJASON KANDEL, (714)564-1038
he Sanitary District recently fixed an 8-inch crack in a
RELATED 13 sewer main near the Belgrave Channel at Springdale
Street. The main spilled about 9,000 gallons of sewage
O.C.SECTIONS into the Belgrave Channel and was the third break in a pipe in
NEWS BY the last year. A resident had reported smelling sewage near the
CONRvRJNITY Belgrave Channel at Springdale Street on Jan. 10.
SPORTS CODVItC}Il 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREP SPORTS
BUSINESS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
SEWAGE SPILLS—ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINES.You will not be
LIFE&STYLE charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERnSEMEt4r
r_Sevlhgs==;'
NextCard Y/�A
Online Balance
Transfers.
2.9% intro APR.
http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINE WS/ORANGE/0CNEWS/t000008808.1.html 1129/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section I Page # I Date Subject
Los Angeles Times 6
LOS ALAMITOS
The Ressmoor-Las Alamitos
Area Sewer District will remain
intact,at least for the foreseeable
future. A majority of the City
Council voted this week to table
a proposal made by Councilman
Charles R Sylvia to consider
breaking up the district that
serves the city. Rossmoor and
parts of Cypress and Seal Beach.
Sylvia argued that the district
is inefficiently run and does not
have adequate financial reserves.
By acting now, he said. the city
could also take over the district's
sitenm#to City Ball. -_
But Mayor Marilynn M.Poe was
joined by three colleagues when
she said the city has too much
going on to propose the contro-
versial action. She cited lawsuits
filed against Seal Beach, for ap-
proving the massive Bgby devel-
opment, and the Los Alamitos
Unified School District, for mov-
ing ahead with plans to build a .
new high school.CouncUman Ar-
thur DeBolt, who served an the
district board, said Sylvia's cam-
plaints are withoutmeriL
-La,Wn M,(714)M-1634
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Foote.-d mh. concerts
■The city relies on storm drains and pump sEat1 ns
?; to keep dry during the rainy season, but public
works officials say the system needs upgrades. i
a` .r;. w..'•.-.:.:s.s'�: .mIrORS NOTE Thh is part of an j t.
i' . o ional series of reports on the$13
billion infrastructure problem facing
Huntington Beads.
KArwma HAr.
That facility then monitors the
-_ time—they're dying of old age,.r level of water it receives.Once it
said Howard Johnson, the dtys:; reaches 10 feet, a sensor signals
water production supervisor. the pump engines to begin chii
_ Renna agreed. nelmg the water into the nearest
"The rate of deterioration from flood control channel.
Mother Nature alone is faster Johnson said when there is a
than we can keep up with," he problem, the pump station seods
said. an automatic signal to the city's
scan GGZ-nuus fNotromtm . Yet the storm pump equip- water division office, where
A fisherman walks past a i ment has motioned in hold up someone is always on call to han-
storm drain at the end of even during the most severe rile any problems.
Goldenwesl Street. nOrm. Remo said city streets some-
-- "We haven't had a failure yet times flood during heavy rains
HUNTINGTON REACH — that we weren't able to repair," because the pump stations ren '
One day soon city officials may Johnson said. only process so much water at a
be forced to spend roughly S75 He recalled one instance time,
million simply to keep the city when one of the pump station -If the station's filled, the
above water. engines had blown out during a water bas got to pond in the
if just one of the city's 15 water particularly harsh El Nino storm steel," he said.
pumping stations faits during a in December 1997.Fortunately,it which a why Retina said in
heavy rainstorm, it will cost S5 had stopped raining by the time addition to replacing equipment.
million to replace, said Jeff crews were alerted to the prob- city officials need to consider
Rena, city water operations lem,he said. building larger pump stations.
manager. "We worked all night on -But sooner or later we're
He said nearly all of the 40- rebuilding the engine and had it going to have to do something.'
year-old storm pump stations, ready by the next day,' he said. be said. 'It's really, 'Pay me now
which help pump rainwater into The pump stations, which are or pay me later."
nearby flood control channels. located in various residential
need to be upgraded. tracts throughout the city, are
'The city should start replac- able to pump roughly 60,000 gat-
ing them if they want that re6a- Ions of water per minute.Johnson
biitty,' Rena said. 'Or else pen. ' said each station is fully automat-
pie will get wet more and more sc.
often.' He said when it begins to rain,
Keeping storm water from water flows from a storm drain
flooding streets and property into a catch basin under the street
throughout the city is another curb. Pipes funnel the water into
major concern on the city's gmw- the nearest storm drain pump sta-
iog list of infrastructure needs. lion.
Although the city's storm
pumps have been well-main-
public works officials
agree that time is taking its toll
"The storm pipes are rotting
- .. , .. all .1�
lNews . cc e n ex - F,3c
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES .HELP
Thursday. January 28,
GARDEN GROVE
By JASON KANDEL, (7I4)564-1038
n an effort to publicize safe environmental practices, the
RELATED .Orange County Sanitation District is releasing a new
informational video, "Protecting the Environment," that
O.C. SECTIONS describes how waste water is treated. The video offers many
NEWS BY answers regarding the processes for Garden Grove residents.
COMMUNITY The district also has a Speaker's Bureau with representatives
who will meet with city,residential or business groups.
SPORTS Information: (714) 741-5101.
PREP SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
BUSINESS
LIFE&STYLE Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
News
NextCard ISASASASA
Online Balance
Transfers.
2.9% intro APR.
http://www.latimes.con✓I TOME/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000008538.1.htrnl 1/28/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register .� � 3 /�ys UV-1-1 7
`:FOUNTAIN VALLEY '
iirhe Orange Coumy Water M
%4ct approved a'water-trans
far egreemeat that will pto- _
vide 100,000 Orange County,_
residents with. m Sa Year's SUP,`
frp ply of water an Bar
nardino Valley Municipal
Water District and the West
-
am Municipal Water,Dis,;-
trim",This transfer has
been number of.yes rs.m
the nakng,",enid Iry i . 1
.'Pickler,president of the
Fountan Valley-based dis-'....
trict.^.It is fortunate that
the high ground-water sima-�.
tion in Sao Bernardino could;
be transformed into this
transfer agreement."U San
Bernardino County ground 'p
water remains high in Years '-
to wine,the agreement may;
be renewed. `• '-.,' s I .
—Olana lenaw(rte)44S4W '
Legislation Seeks To Stem Expensive Y2K Lawsuits Page 1 of 2
$otao �*rre2
1 �
Site Map Search COMPUTERWORLD Contact Us Subscribe
® � 'fSYYL'LSi1Li'i{{8{IL7
News
•Late Legislation Seeks To Stem
bestnes
•News bye(audio7 o)
•lW Minute(audio) Expensive Y2K Lawsuits
•Continued
from print
Features McCain's bill would limit punitive damages
•Managing
•Year2DDD By Matt Hamblen
•Review Center 01,25/e9 With 34 lawsuits over year 2000 problems already
•In Depth in the courts, House and Senate Republicans hope to
Viewpoint stem a costly legal stampede with legislation, including a
•Paul Gitlin bill filed last week.
•More columnists
Latest Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) introduced the Y2K Act,
publications which has been referred to his Senate Commerce
•Most recent Committee. A similar House bill was filed Jan. 6. Both
publications measures limit court awards so that punitive damages
would be no larger than three times the amount of actual
economic losses. The bills also would create courtroom
alternatives such as arbitration to avoid time-consuming
court proceedings. "The purpose of this legislation is to
ensure that we look to solving ... Y2K rather than clog
our courts with years of costly litigation," McCain said.
There are already at least 34 year 2000 lawsuits pending
in state and federal courts, including the latest, brought
Jan. 13 by a large New York law firm against AT&T Corp.
and Lucent Technologies Inc., according to analysts and
court records.
The Clinton administration is unsure legislation is
necessary. "There is no consensus position on liability
legislation among the industry groups working on the
matter," said John Koskinen, chairman of the President's
Year 2000 Conversion Council. However, David LeDuc,
manager of legislative polity at the Software and
Information Industry Association in Washington, said his
group is working with an informal Y2K coalition of
http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nspCNNT]ash/990125RC8E 1/28/99
Legislation Seeks To Stem Expensive Y2K Lawsuits Page 2 of 2
industries that believes otherwise. "There's a consensus
and a need for a large bill . . . to address the large
number of cases coming," he said.
-----------------------------------------------------------
NEWS x FEATURES I RESOURCE CENTER I IT .ARF RS I COMPUTERWORLO INC
Ca1act Us l Searcn I Site Man I SupSLbt:
COMPUTERWORLO
Copyright 01999 ComputemorlE,Inc.All rights resonea.Local notices and trademark attributions
Back to top
httt,:Hwwu,.comnuterm,orld.comthome/print.nsf/CWR;I9h/99012SRCSE 1/2R/99
ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL
February 8, 1999
FHere Comes a No-Growth Uprising
■ By PETER BRENNAN ning controversies over housing at Bolsa Chica,a resort at
Dana Point Headlands and the James A. Musick Jail in
Throughoutthecounty,no-growthand slow-growth move- Irvine.But there arc many other protests that have surfaced
menu are springing up,at a level that hasn't been seen since in recent months.
the late 1980s. Property owners at Monarch Beach signed a form ac-
The latest and most publicized — knowledging their ocean views
and also the one with the biggest po- might someday be impaired, but
tential impact— is a proposed iniva- they've complained nevertheless
live from opponents of an airport at El about a nearby residential pmject
Toro. Their Safe and Healthy Corn- being built by Capital Pacific Hold-
munities Act would require a two, s ings. A group representing 600
thirds vote for approval of what they - 'p` S` - homeowners in Huntington Beach
cal l"noxious projects;'including air-
A residents argued that a proposed
ports,landfills and prisons. a Wal-Mart would create too much
But a commercial airport at El Tom traffic in the area;the City Council
that
is just one of several projects t are - narrowly approved the store,saying
beingcomplained about. Proposed site of resort at Treasure Island In it would brio $SOO,000a year into
P Laguna Beach:one of several battle grounds g y
There are,of course, the long-run- y No-Growth page 18
pare is see user:ww.acll.cOm ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL Febwmr K.IW1
No-Growth grow on a fence so that it doesn't black the development? while growth was cited by 5%,making it only
1 V•.` public's view of the lake from a nearby road.A Is there a feeling that maybe The county is the sixth biggest problem facing the county.
/ram Jorge 1 group of Laguna Niguel residents opposed a built out and no more growth should be al- One of the biggest battles over growth in the
50-font non-working bell lower at St. Anne lowed. Apoll Iasi Septemberby Universilyof I980s occurred in Irvine, but it doesn't look
city coffers in revenue. School as unsightly.Andsomelhingthal would California Irvine researchers Mark Baldassare like it'll be a repeal Ibis time around.
Laguna Beach activists signed up enough seem loappcal to no-growth proponents,beach and Cheryl Katz revealed that 66% of the Irvine Struggle Over
voters to force an initiative on whether a$75 bicycle paths, were rejected by the San respondents would vole to approve lawslimil-
million hotel/residential project at Treasure Clemente City Council as too disruptive In the ing development in their communities. Larry Agran, a current Irvine city council
Island should be built. San Juan Capistrano, coastline. member and former mayor whn led the fight
where some residents fear Ion much develop- for what he calls "controlled growth;' said
mend would harm its Spanish flavor and could Pattern to Protests 'The greal struggle Irvine has already fought its battle with the
even disorient the famous swallows, has a Each case is different, and the reasons for Irvine Co. and both sides reached a comprn-
moratorium on building large-scale projects opposing projects vary, but developers sug. Ives Ron in the hue mise of preserving open space but allowing
within the city until next May. gest there is a general pattern to anti-develop- 1980s.' some development. lie said some Irvine new
A group of Sierra Club activists are prepar- mend Protests—they tend to increase when the Irvine th comers are worried about grow , and they
ing plans to fight the Foothill South loll road; economy is booming,as it is now. — question whether The city should go slower on
In bone up on how to do it, they recently "When limes are lough,you don't see people Councilman permidling new developments.
listened to a speech from a Bundinglon Beach griping about stuff,"said Mike Larson,presi- tarry g A mn "We pointou uopcoplelbaldhegrcalsdrugglc
activist who's been fighting development at dent of PLC Commercial. "When everyone was won in the lade 19811s. We preserved
Bales Chica.ResidenlsofTurtle Rockinlrvine gets far, dumb and happy again, there's a 16,600 acres of open space in Irvine,and we
are talking privately to their city council mem- segment that says we're growing too much" For the most part,developers answered no to have the most remarkable open space of any
her;about a development being planned by the Ludlon added. "Traditionally. smart dcvel- city west of the Mississippi; said Agran.
all these are runs.
Irvine Company. opers gel entitled during recessions because Although Orange County is the largest in
"People are boyhood to specific instances re
In Yorba Linda, a no-growth movement you don't have the no-growth factions" Southern California in terms of population
specific neighborhoods.prhaerds.They lend lobe more
fielded alasingslale ofcouncil candidates last The tale l9Rlhwasaboom period that brought vocal on those Projecls;'said tarry Thomas, density per square mile,developers said they
November. on tremendous traffic jams. A slow-growth senior VP ofcorporate communications at The don't believe its residents have a sense that it's
The Anaheim City Council seriously exam- movement appeared in the form of a county- Irvine Company."I see no evidence from sur- all built out and nothing more can be built.
incd a proposal to limit gas stations for fear wide ballol measure,but it was defemed.Then veys that a huge no-growth movement is going Christine Dicmer,CEO of the Building In
there might be one on every corner. the Tecessionoccurred and the no-growth move- on." duslry Association of Orange County.pointed
A plan to convert drug-recovery center into mend faded away. Lie pointed out that in the same UCi survey, out that similar movements have appeared in
a full-fledge hospital a Is the Belly Ford Cenler The complaints bring up larger questions:Is Orange County residents believed growth San Diego and Ventura counties in the past
was rejected by Laguna Beach City Council the movement different this lime around? would be good for them and 75%believe the year and that Vice President At Gore is prey
after 200 residents complained about it. Could Orange County be lurningaway from its county will either be a better place to live or moling"smart growth" where there is more
Little things are under fire, too: Mission conservative,pro-business roots?Could it be slay the same.And in that survey,when resi- open land.
Viejo is arguing with the Lake Mission Viejo going the way of Ventura County,where re- dents were asked what was the number one "This tension and feeling is not just isolaled
Association over how tall the oleander can I ant initiatives have practically shut down problem, crime was ranked highest at 30% 1 to Orange County,"she said.■
lnulc cVwny WULKC1b act bix-11gurc J WA.. ...g.. . ... .
government sEOClmuerrsa9e ,, m uxt,a�maa. . m
iL C= F
MEeaAMGgO]IMIT PttJSIG
ocregister com
More county workers get six-
figure salaries
LABOR: The number of government employees
paid $100,000 or more is up 24% in about a
year.
February 7, 1999
Elat6rs.
By DAVID PARRISH
The Orange County Register
The ranks of county government executives,managers and
professionals pulling down a base salary of$100,000 or
more has jumped 24 percent,to 231, in little more than a
year.
An additional 61 employees,mostly attorneys in the District
Attorney's Office,are now being paid just$54 short of the
county's six-figure club.
And the number of employees receiving base pay of$90,000
or more has leaped 41 percent during the same period,since
October 1997. The average county employee is paid
$42,954.
The salaries of the highest paid county government
employees were obtained in January by the Register through
the Public Records Act and compared with a similar list
from October 1997. The comparison showed that several
employees had their salaries increased by more than the
standard county rise of 3 percent to 4 percent in the past 14
months,in some cases boosting them above six figures.
County officials said there was a variety of reasons for the
sudden growth in highly paid positions,such as promotions,
salary adjustments, keeping pace with a hot job market and
recent across-the-board raises—the first granted since the
county's December 1994 bankruptcy.
Jan Mittermeier,the county executive officer and the highest
paid employee,at$149,801,said her executives and
managers played a major role in getting things back on a
fiscally responsible track after the county's$1.6 billion
financial meltdown.
http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay00gw.shtml 2/9/99
...wo .way wur&w.gm six-ngure satartes Page 2 of 5
"If you want to attract and maintain these people,you have
to be competitive in the marketplace," Mittermeier said.
"You have to pay for talent. Why do we care if our salaries
are competitive?Because that's going to give up the best
product—the people who create and develop ideas and lead
the organization."
Others outside county government had a mixed view of the
recent jump in high-end salaries.
Bruce Whitaker,a spokesman for the Committees of
Correspondence,a government watchdog group,saw the
numbers as evidence of a relaxation of fiscal restraint as the
county moves further away from the public scrutiny that
followed the bankruptcy.
"While the times are good this doesn't come home to roost,
but in the next down cycle I suspect the county will have
budget problems,"Whitaker said.
The sharp rise in high-end salaries also is indicative of an
attitude among county government executives that they
should be paid on par with those working in private
business,he said.
"The old deal,when you work in government,is you have a
great deal of security and great benefits, but not top pay,"
Whitaker said.
The equal-pay concept also rankles Fred Whittlesey,the
principal at Compensation and Performance Management of
Newport Beach, which designs and evaluates employee
compensation plans for businesses.
A six-figure salary for county executives and managers
might well be justified,he said but the demands on them
can't be compared to what private-industry executives face.
Turnover for business executives runs at about 40 percent,
with a quick exit waiting for those who can't find markets
and produce a profit.
"There are not people putting in 80 to 100 hours per week,"
Whittlesey said of county government. "When you choose a
county job,you are choosing less hours and less risk."
Such comments irritate Mittermeier.
"The public has this perception that government employees
are 8-to-5, and that they don't work as hard as the private
sector, so they shouldn't be paid as much," Mittermeier said. -
"It doesn't work like that anymore. Government executives
work just as hard and (are)as creative."
http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay008w.shtml 2/9/99
n�um cuwuy wwnct>gc�>�n-ugwc >wwic> a agc � w ..
Mittermeier, through a spokeswoman, said she is generally
in her office by 7 a.m.,doesn't leave until after 7 p.m. and
then has many evening speaking engagements and meetings,
as well.
"We're guessing around 70 hours (a week)but it's sometimes
more than that," said spokeswoman Diane Thomas.
As for other executives in her office, Mittermeier doesn't
keep track of their hours but "knows people are here late at
night and early in the morning,"Thomas said. "(They)put in
whatever time it takes to get the job done better than anyone
else could do it."
Jan Walden, county director of human resources, said that
for the most part the county is competing for employees
with other government agencies, but salaries still must be in
the ballpark of what is paid in private industry.
Recently, the county learned how expensive it can be to hire
from the private sector.
Tom Uram,the Health Care Agency director, retired last
year, and his acting replacement,Ron DiLuigi, later resigned
to take a job at St. Joseph Hospital. Uram was paid
$118,185.
Last month,Mittermeier had to boost the pay for that
position to$145,808 to lure Donald Oxley, 54, away from a
private HMO hospital network. Oxley is now the second-
highest-paid county employee.
Even at that, Oxley said, he took a pay cut to come to
Orange County.
"It was significant," Oxley said without revealing the
amount. "You don't make as much money in terms of direct
compensation, but there are benefits. The retirement system
is of interest to me at this stage in my life."
Now Mittetmeier has one department head, Oxley,who is
paid$15,000 to$20,000 more than her other key executives.
"We will have to look at some sort of salary adjustments,"
she said, adding that probably would not happen this year.
That is not just out of fairness, Mittermeier said, but to
prevent other government agencies from raiding her
department heads.
Whitaker said that's just the type of thinking that produces
big salaries in county government.
http://www.ocregister.com/politicstpay008w.shtml 2/9/99
.rw.c wwuy wutxua ge.aix-Lgare]alarle� rage 4 OI D
"It's very hard for the top dogs to have a hard line against
budget-busting raises for those below," Whitaker said.
County figures show the number of six-figure employees
has grown from 187 in October 1997 to 231 last month.
During the same period,the number earning $90,000 or
more rose to 423 from 293.
One of the biggest boosts to the county's six-figure club was
the addition of 14 captains in the Sheriffs Department and
Marshal's Office—all of whom received a raise of more
than 15 percent last year, moving to $100,755 from a base
pay of$87,526.
Captains were underpaid compared with counterparts in
other area policing agencies,said Walden,the human
resources director.
Similarly,a major addition to the ranks of those making
more than$90,000 came from 54 sheriffs and marshal's
lieutenants receiving a raise of more than 15 percent last
year,boosting pay to$90,771 from$78,499.
"With just minimal overtime it was possible for sergeants to
make more than lieutenants," said Assistant Sheriff Doug
Storm.
Other significant raises—"equity adjustments"—went to
executives considered to be underpaid. Several went to
women—including Walden—who had risen rapidly
through the ranks under Mittermeier's administration but had
seen their paychecks lagging behind those of their male
counterparts.
Walden received a 9.2 percent raise,moving to$97,177
from$88,337.
Courtney Wiercioch,manager of the EI Toro airport project,
received a 10 percent raise last year,to $94,036 from
$95,488.
Despite those raises,there were only two women among the
25 top-paid county executives.
A few more women,however,have entered the county's six-
figure club from 14 months ago. In October 1997,there
were 33 women making $100,000 or more; now there are
54.
Salary adjustments also have gone to men,most notably
John Adams,the county librarian. His pay went up 17
percent,to$103,313. County officials explained that this
was necessary because a survey showed he was significantly
http://www.ocregister.conL/politics/pay008w.shtml 2/9/99
MOM cowry wurwers 8CL six-ngure saranes rage 3 or D
underpaid compared with head librarians in other counties
and cities.
On average,Mittermeier gave her executives and managers
about a 4 percent raise last summer. Then in December,the
county's top 60 executives received an additional 3 percent
raise in the form of a tax-free contribution to their deferred-
compensation retirement accounts.
Along with elected county officials, Mittermeier—who is
appointed by the Board of Supervisors—received a 6
percent contribution in December to her deferred-
compensation account,to go with the 7 percent raise
supervisors gave her in July.
Mittermeier said giving raises is a balancing act.
"They thought I was too tight-fisted when I gave out 4
percent to the county executives," Mittermeier said. "I want
to retain the best people,but we have to make sure we are
fiscally responsible also."
fl nempa"rm omnie couniY,cammia
.re
ow
Coppi9h110.1
O 1996-1999 TM Onrpa Coumy Rnislar
Pbese aerq mmmems to ooeaktet®4nk.imeEom.mm
http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay008w.shtml 219/99
som"s MMIMTRAQ .
technolo y ome age .ram .m. u o ccess m
R1NELaaNGF[LUNY aFCJFiFR 7
ocree inter com
Bay water discharge plan is back
ENVIRONMENT: District will again try to put
reclaimed water into Upper Newport body, but in
with ecological incentives.
Edpeof Natun__;.;;y..
February 5, 1999
Om Universe„i:.i ..y
By PAT BRENNAN
The Orange County Register
The last time Irvine Ranch Water
District tried to discharge treated
waste water into Upper Newport
Bay, it touched off a storm of _
environmental protest. .u,"
A year of litigation followed. And i image or
y g i image or vi eo
when ajudge in October nullified the footage. (4421Q
district's permit to discharge the
water, it appeared the project was rhea video requires the
headed for the scrap heap. o° `oam wea n n re-'
y�Video
But the district wants to resurrect its yQ�covmy NarsChanneF
for more pictures on
plan—this time with modifications this ara moor Orerge County
news,
meant to improve the Back Bay's mac*OCN 24 hours aday.
habitat,save the city hundreds of You oars e,mea OCN ah
thousands of dollars a year in oaOMSLeedem.
dredging costs,and, district engineers ope,win me
approval of environmental activists.
'T n not convinced we'll be able to make everybody happy,"
said Ken Thompson,the district's director of water quality.
"But I think we've put together a project with a lot of
benefits for the environment,and we're looking for support
for it."
The activists who successfully sued over the previous plan
expressed skepticism Thursday. They said they'll would wait
to pass judgment until they can analyze the plan,to be
released at a water district board meeting Monday.
"The devil is in the details," said Mark Wolfe,an attorney
with the Natural Heritage Institute in San Francisco who
crafted the earlier lawsuit. "It looks like they're doing an
end-run around(the judge's)decision."
http://www.ocregister.com/sciencetwater005w.shtmi 2/9/99
Bob Caustin, a Newport Beach clean-water activist, had
similar worries.
"They're just dressing up the Trojan horse in a different
color," he said.
But both he and Wolfe said they would not rule out
supporting the plan if it turns out to be a genuine benefit to
the bay.
"If they can take care of the problems (in the plan)why don't
they just say so?" Caustin said. "We'd love to go and do
something else."
Thompson said the district could save hundreds of thousands
of dollars by diverting some of the water from a treatment
plant into the bay during heavy rains. The original plan,
which received approval from the Regional Water Quality
Control Board in 1996, would have discharged reclaimed
water—derived from waste water, but refined until it looks
clear—directly into San Diego Creek, which flows into
Upper Newport Bay.
That drew the protests from activists. The reclaimed water
still contains higher levels of nitrogen than normal water.
And nitrogen is one of the Back Bay's biggest problems: It
brings blooms of algae that choke the bay's underwater
habitat.
Although the regional water board found the nitrogen levels
acceptable, Orange County Superior Court Judge Robert
Thomas didn't.
The district's new version of the water plan looks,to a
nontechnician, a bit like the wacky mechanical constructions
of Rube Goldberg. But Thompson said the district's
engineers spent years perfecting it.
First, water from San Diego Creek would be diverted into
the district's settling ponds. Early estimates place the cost of
the diversion system at$250,000 or more.
The silty water that would normally flow into the Back Bay,
raising its sediment levels and forcing the county to
regularly employ expensive dredging equipment, would
instead flow through the chain of ponds on the district's
property.
The ponds are a gathering place for water birds and a
popular recreation spot.
The water from the district's waste-water-reclamation plant,
meanwhile, would flow through a pipeline to the Sand
http://www.ocregister.com/science/water005w.shtml 2/9/99
Canyon Reservoir, which is inland from the water district.
The treated water would mingle with water held in the
reservoir,diluting it, and would be released only when the
reservoir overflows because of storms.
Thompson said that means zero to 100 million gallons of
water will be discharged into the Back Bay every year—
primarily during the rainy season. The discharges would be
intermittent and rare.
That's compared to 900 million gallons under the old plan,
with six months'worth of constant discharge.
This year, Thompson said,rains are so moderate that the
water discharge would have been zero so far.
Once discharged, the water would be further diluted as it
passed along the creek and into the bay.And the diversion
of sediment-loaded water from the creek would so greatly
reduce nitrogen and phosphorous that the bay would end up
with a net reduction in nitrogen,despite the occasional
discharge of reclaimed water.
"I think it provides the Newport Bay something it has never
had before," Thompson said. "And that's wintertime
protection from (nitrogen). And, more importantly,it will
enhance sediment removal."
The plan requires approval from the regional water board.
And the activists will be watching closely every step of the
way,ready to challenge the plan if they find it wanting.
!1 newspaper in oninire county.Mini—
I
Ne ;..
Copyright O 19 1999 The Orange Coumy Raglsler
Plasm send comments to oaegulerdtil heeEom.com
http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterOO5w.shtmi 219/99
ews _ � � I e n ex - co
Y' • I. ORANGE COUNTY NEWS WELPI
REBATES: . MIIIfN\f VlfnN\ 1
JED,._ISON '
r ,
Wednesday, a ruary 10, 1999
ANAHEIM
Flooded Intersection Closes Businesses
By DEBRA CANO. Special to The Times
broken water main shot a fountain of water into the air
RELATED 131 Tuesday afternoon, flooding an Anaheim intersection
SECT]vS and forcing several businesses to close for the day.
The break tore a 10- by 30-foot hole in the pavement and
MAIN PAGE spilled thousands of gallons of water into the streets shortly
before noon. No other damage was caused and no one was hurt.
NEWSBY
COMMUNITY Police barricaded Broadway and Euclid Street for several
SPORTS blocks in each direction through the evening and traffic was
diverted from the area.
PREP SPORTS The break not only inconvenienced motorists and residents,
but disrupted businesses. Gasoline station pump islands were
BUSINESS empty, stores had no customers and about a dozen businesses
SO CAL LIVING were without water.
Some restaurants put up "closed" signs and businesses
CALENDAR ranging from hair salons to automotive garages canceled
appointments.
CALENDAR 'Nobody can drive over here," said Jim Rayes, manager of a
WEEKEND Union 76 gas station. "We don't have any business today."
HOME DESIGN The loss of water was particularly effective at putting the
Laundry Stop, a self-service laundry, out of business for the
COMMENTARY day. "People had clothes in the wash cycle" when the water
T.V.TIMES stopped, said owner Rich Murg.
Anaheim water utility crews worked through the afternoon
to repair the 10-inch pipe. Officials expected to restore service
to the businesses on Euclid by last night, said Ray Merchant,
Anaheim Public Utilities spokesman. No homes were affected,
he said.
ADVERTISEMENT City officials are investigating the cause of the break. The
cast-iron water pipe was installed in 1959 and appeared to be in
good shape, Merchant said.
N•w S Authorities expect to reopen streets in the area in time for
this morning's commute.
I"eseiglous CopwiRhi 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
ANAHEIM(CA), FLOODING, PIPELINES, EOUIPMENT FAILURES.
V SA You will not be charged-to for stories,only to retrieve one.
http://www.latimes.com/HONIENEWSIOR-kNGE'tOOOOI 2591.Lhtml 2/10/99
"vs _ Gc ienex - G'3
• a ' - 0#,'1 f 11 ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
Wednesday, a ruary 10, 1999
DANA POINT
By CHRIS CEBALLOS. (949)248.2I50
13,000-gallon sewage spill, caused by a pump station
RELATED failure, has closed half a mile of Monarch Beach at Salt
—Creek to surfing,swimming and diving. Beach-goers
O.C.SECTIONS should avoid the water near storm drains and other coastal
MAIN PAGE outlets because bacteria levels can rise during and after
rainstorms. For updates on beach closures, call: (714) 667-
NEWS BY 3752.
COMMUNITY
SPORTS Coovrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREP SPORTS b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
BUSMESS SEWAGE SPILLS--ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH.
BEACHES--ORANGE COUNTY. You will not be charged to look for
SO CAL LIVING stories,only to retrieve one.
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
News
NextCard
Online Balance
Transfers.
2.9% intro APR.
httr:ut i%iv.latimes.comfHO',iF'VFNI�'Srf1RAN''C,F'tnnnnl'_'597.1.html 2/10/99
ews Go IF n ex Go
I g ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
TAT The w • MBA
University . BA
Alliance° • CIS
ues ay, a ruary , 1 99
LA PALMA
By HARRISONSHEPPARD, (714) 966-5977
reception will be held next week for outgoing
RELATED Councilwoman Eva Miner Bradford, who is resigning to
become a Morrison missionary in Arizona The
O.C.SECTIONS community reception is scheduled for the City Hall foyer Feb.
MAIN PAGE 16 at 6 p.m., before the regular council meeting. Bradford, a
councilwoman for 10 years, and her husband, Stewart,will
NEWS BY leave next month for the two-year mission in Tempe.
COMMUNITY
SPORTS Coovrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
PREPSPORTS
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stores.You will
BUSINESS not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
SO CAL LIVING
CALENDAR
CALENDAR
WEEKEND
HOME DESIGN
COMMENTARY
T.V.TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
n
f-LA
�n,i0
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000012461.1.html 219/99
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
orange County Register
DANA POINT
Neighbors on all sides of a
tw"ory home at 3S79S
Beach Road in Capistrano
Beach will right the last
round today in preventing
the demolition of the build-
ing and construcion of a
new single-family mean-
front home. The building is
owned by Beach Palisades
Inc. and occupied by Jehu
Hand.Neighbors say a new
building,which will extend
five feet farther toward the
ocean,will obstruct their
views.City staff recom-
mends the City Council al-
low the construction.The
council meets at 6:30 p.m.
r at 33M Colder Lantern
Street,Suite 210. ... A pump-
station failure in the Moulton
Niguel Water District system
mused 13,000 gallons of raw
sewage to spill into Salt
Creek Beach waters Monday
morning.A quarter-mile
stretch of beach in each di-
rection will be closed for at
least of three days while the
aunty conducts tests.
Dennis Kaiser
(949)454-7329
e+lina TWabrt
(949)454-r394
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper section Page # Date =t —,
[Orange County Register + 2 I 1« I ✓
� LA HABRA i
Motorists driving eastbound on
Imperial Highway we'll notice
congestion tightening up as
the Orange County Sanita-
tion District is expected to
finish its work at Harbor
Boulevard and Imperial
Highway on Friday.Howev.
er,widening of right-turn
lanes at Imperial and Idaho
Street has hit a snag with
the removal of a traffic sig-
nal,and work is not expKt.
ed to be completed there un.
til the end of March.
Andrew Turtle
(714)7"3730
orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register -41a
State will again
support farmers
in water dispute
The state of California on
Monday resurrected its support
of farmers and other water us.
ers in an escalating and com-
plex legal dispute with the U.S.
government over the manage-
ment of the nation's biggest wa-
ter project.
The friendrokhecourt motion
filed in U.S. District Court by
the Davis administration re-
vives a challenge to the way the
Department of Interior is meet-
ing a provision to protect fish
and wildlife under the 1992 Cen-
tral Valley Project Improve-
ment Act.
The new Democratic regime,
upon evaluating a similar brief
it had recently withdrawn by
outgoing Republican Gov. Pete
Wilson,now agrees that Interi-
or's water-allocation plan
should be scrapped and revised.
At issue is how 800,000 acre-
feet of water allocated each
year for fish and wildlife should
be accounted for under an over-
haul of the Central Valley Pro-
ject.
U
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 27, 1999
pJN ANITgl�
Q
x
o �
e1Cl'N� ENV`�p�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
OC90• P.O.Box 8127•Fountain Valley,CA 927284127•(714)962-2411
Minutes for Board Meeting
9 01/27/99
Page 2 of 6
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on January 27, 1999, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
A Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
X John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
A Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F.Walker
A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy L Neugebauer James V. Evans
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
A Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,Assistant
General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin;
Patrick Miles; Bob Oolen; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Ryal Wheeler,
Chuck Winsor, Moira Sullivan
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Greg Woodside
Minutes for Board Meeting
01/27/99 1
Page 3 of 6
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the
following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director
Buena Park Jack Mauller• Patsy Marshall
Fountain Valley John J. Collins* Laurann Cook
Fullerton Don Bankhead Jan Flory'
Huntington Beach Peter Green* Dave Garofalo
Irvine Christina Shea' Greg Smith
La Palma Eva Miner Bradford Paul F. Walker
Newport Beach Jan Debay Tom Thomson
Orange Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill'
Seal Beach Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
Tustin Thomas R. Saltarelli• Jim Potts
Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson' Gene Wisner
Board of Supervisors Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Due to the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair reported that the OMTS Committee meeting
had been cancelled for February. He then thanked staff for holding a workshop for Directors
regarding the strategic plan on January 91", and a New Directors Orientation on January 150
.
Vice Chair Swan also reported that Chair Debay had requested a workshop for the Directors be
held in March regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System EIR. A tentative date has
been set for Saturday, March 13", from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager requested Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, to give a brief
presentation on why a special workshop was being held on the Groundwater Replenishment
System EIR. Mr. Anderson also gave a brief presentation on the Kem County biosolids issue
and the purchase option for Wheeler Ridge.
Moira Sullivan, Chair of the Employee Activity Committee, was then recognized who presented
Don McIntyre with an award in connection with employee purchased gifts for the Christmas
charity program.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chair ordered the minutes of the regular meeting held December 16, 1998, approved, as
corrected.
v Minutes for Board Meeting
0 01/27/99
Page 4 of 6
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/98 12/31/98
Totals $4,470,465.13 $5,183,798.71
Director Mark Leyes abstained.
CONSENT CALENDAR
9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to
execute quitclaim deeds for three existing sewer easements located in the City of
Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-3, to Cal
Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Unocal, in a form approved by General
Counsel.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was
presented by Director Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the January
27, 1999 meeting.
The Vice Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held
on December 16, 1998 to be filed.
12. A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Strategic Plan re the January 6, 1999 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the
meeting held on January 6, 1999 to be filed.
13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications
for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4
(Rebid), on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation; and (3)Authorize award of a contract for Seismic Retrofit of Four
Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid), to Ark Construction
Company for an amount not to exceed$618,000.
14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for
the month of December 1998.
Minutes for Board Meeting v
01/27/99 0
Page 5 of 6
15. Ordinance No. OCSD-08, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County
Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting
Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County
Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04:
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-08 by title
only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-08.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-08 as an
urgency measure, to be effective immediately:
AYES: Steve Anderson, Don Bankhead, Shawn Boyd, John Collins, Lynn Daucher,
Brian Donahue, Norm Eckenrode, James M. Ferryman, Peter Green, John M.
Gullixson, Mark Leyes, Shirley McCracken, Pat McGuigan, Joy L.
Neugebauer, Russell Patterson, Anna L Piercy, Thomas R. Saltarelli,
Christina Shea, Peer Swan, Charles E. Sylvia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Jan Debay, Eva Miner-Bradford, Mark Murphy, Todd Spitzer
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Early Retirement Incentive
Agreement with Orange County Employees Retirement System in connection with
Ordinance No. OCSD-08.
16. A presentation was given by Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, on major
strategic plan issues associated with the groundwater replenishment system and ocean
discharge.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
(54956.9): The Board convened in closed session at 7:45 p.m., pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors
have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are
maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and
Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time
the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). No reportable action was
taken re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(3).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:35 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
The General Counsel reported that the Board of Directors ordered that the Application for
Permission to File Late Claim, Claim of Michael Rozengurt, be denied, and notification thereof
be forwarded to counsel for Claimant.
Minutes for Board Meeting
a 01/27/99
Page 6 of 6
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Director Bankhead requested that consideration of changing the meeting time for board
meetings from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. be placed on the February agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m.
Secretary of a Board of ire c ors of
Orange Cou ty Sanitati District
Hixp.dtaragendalBoard Minu WIN9 Board MinutesM2799xim
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
15905 Orange County Sanitation District $ 382.689.37 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
15906 Parker Diving Services, Inc. 34,850.00 Professional Services J-394
15907 Southern California Edison 58,558.06 Power
15908 Tula RanchlMagan Fans 46,019.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
15909 Battery Specialties 22.47 Batteries
15910 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
15911 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 11,376.00 Engineering Services J40-1,J40-2
15912 Chapman&Hall I CRC Press 61.61 Publicaton
15913 Claim Jumper Restaurant 100.00 DART Luncheon Deposit
15914 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
15915 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
15916 CSUS Foundation, Inc. 107.25 Training Videos
15917 Dee Jaspers&Assoc. 2,090.25 Legal Services
15918 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
15919 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
16920 Geometrix Consultants 19,211.15 Legal Services
rr 15921 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
Y 15922 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,073.25 Dues Deduction
15923 Multiform Systems Corp. 990.00 Controller Sunscreen
15924 National Plant Services, Inc. 900.00 Vacuum Truck Services
15926 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
15926 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
15927 OCFA 582.62 Dues Deduction
15928 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
15929 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
15930 Peace Officers Council of CA $46.00 Dues Deduction
15931 Reliastar 8,212.43 Life Insurance Premium
15932 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 775.97 Tools/Hardware
15933 SkillPath Seminars 597.00 On-Site Training
15934 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax
16935 The Burlington N. &Santa Fe Railway Co. 4,000.00 License Agreement 3-38-1
15936 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 1.256.00 Lab Services
15937 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions
15938 POstBankFrenkfurt(50010060) 169.20 Publication
15939 WGI Solutions 170.80 Temporary Employment Services
15940 Terry H.Ahn 125.80 Training Expense Reimb.
15941 Mark A.Esquer 1,419.05 Meeting Expense Reimb.
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
15942 Yvonne L.Schwab 109.40 Training Expense Reimb.
15943 AKM Consulting Engineers 29.450.47 Consulting Services 11-20
15944 Bio Gro Division 27,267.24 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
15945 Carollo Engineers 342.787.87 Engineering Services-Pt-38, P2-43, MO4-14-93
15946 Dupont Engineered Services 118.199.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98
15947 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 44,689.67 Engineering Services 241
15948 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,492.36 Medical Insurance Premium
15949 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 64.281.84 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
15950 Lee&Ro, Inc. 38.660.24 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
15951 Nat West Markets 66.134.56 COP Letter of Credit Fees
15952 Orange County Water District 43,210.80 GAP Water Use MO 16-23-96
15953 Pacific Investment Management 122,789.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97
15954 Pacifcare of Ca. 36.585.99 Health Insurance Premium
15955 United HealthCare/Matra Health 131,784.19 Medical Health Insurance
15956 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 114,209.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
15957 Advance Constructors, Inc. 68.256.90 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5
15958 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 263.392.20 Construction 7-17
K 15959 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 251,235.90 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
7 15960 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 61,712.28 Construction 240
N 15961 The Vantage Group LLC 18,016.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
15962 American Telephone&Telegraph 24.35 Long Distance Telephone Services
15963 American Telephone&Telegraph 1,637.78 Long Distance Telephone Services
15964 American Telephone&Telegraph 23.09 Long Distance Telephone Services
15965 American Telephone&Telegraph 107.46 Long Distance Telephone Services
15966 A-Plus Systems 1,775.07 Notices&Ads
15967 Adamson Industries 1,650.90 Lab Supplies
15968 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.397.50 Engine Testing J-19
15969 Aidco Systems, Inc. 20.558.59 Engine Supplies
15970 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 243A3 Lab Supplies
15971 Airborne Express 9.25 Air Freight
15972 Allied Supply Company 5,823.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
15973 American Airlines 3,521.00 Travel Services
15974 American Management Association 150.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription
15975 Angelus Engine Center 38.66 Truck Supplies
15976 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 465.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
15977 Appleone Employment Service 828.00 Temporary Employment Services
15978 Applied Industrial Technology 137.86 Pump Supplies
15979 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 2,350.00 Lab Supplies
Page 2 of 9
• s
C �
Claims Paid From 12/1198 to 12/16198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
15980 Atlantic Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement
15981 ASS Industrial Systems, Inc. 2,390.46 Electrical Supplies
15982 Assoc.of Metro.Sewerage Agency 475.00 Registration
15983 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 721.43 Printing MO 11-7-94
15984 Bearings&Drives,Inc. 975.51 Storage Containers
15985 BioSource Consulting 14,138.26 Consulting Services,-Biosolids&Watershed
15986 Boyle Engineering Corporation 19,493.00 Engineering Services 7-23
15987 Bristol Systems, Inc. 24,970.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
15988 BuyComp 1,497.11 (5)Palm III Connected Organizers w/Carrying Cases
15989 BNI Building News 185.40 Publications&Books
15990 C&H Distributions 119.80 Software License Fees
15991 California Auto Collision 431.11 Repair Kits
15992 California Automatic Gate 170.00 Service Agreement
15993 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor
15994 Calolympic Safety 23,187.76 Safety Supplies-Confined Space Removal Stations @ Plants 1 &2
15995 Caltrol, Inc. 314.14 Hardware
15996 CalTrans-Publication Unit 112.00 Subscription
rt 15997 Charles P.Crowley Co. 519.07 Instrument Parts
7 15998 City Office Furniture, Inc. 187.44 Ofice Supplies
u+ 15999 Coast Fire Equipment 445.45 Service Agreement
16000 Communication Briefings 74.00 Communications Video
16001 Compressor Components Of Calif. 7.432.60 Pump Supplies
16002 Compuserve Incorporated 109.70 Computer Services
16003 Computers America, Inc. 1,049.65 Computer Supplies
16004 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,349.00 Electrical Supplies
16005 Consolidated Freightways 274.00 Freight
16006 Corporate Express 630.83 Office Supplies
16007 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Service Spec No. 9899-09
16008 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 71.10 Truck Parts
16009 County of Orange 140.00 Permit Fees
16010 County of Orange 1,854.21 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16011 County Wholesale Electric Co. 751.84 Electrical Supplies
16012 Culligan Water 2,304.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16013 CEM Corporation 592.37 Lab Supplies
16014 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 822.15 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer
16015 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 4,365.98 Lab Supplies
16016 CSMFO 60.00 Seminar Registration
16017 Deaver Manufacturing Co. 126.60 Truck Supplies
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12115198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16018 Del Mar Analytical 1,444.00 Biosolids Analysis
16019 Dell Marketing L.P. 21.016.69 4 Sony Monitors,3 Dell Computer Workstations 8 2 Dell Notebook Computers
16020 DeZudck 2.906.37 Valves
16021 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance
16022 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 107.10 Paint Supplies
16023 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,835.07 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
16024 E.G. Heller's Son,Inc. 56.58 Subscription
16025 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 185.00 Medical Screening
16026 Electra Bond, Inc. 686.83 Mechanical Supplies
16027 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 3,600.00 CPR/First Aid Training
16028 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
16029 Enedech 555.00 Electrical Supplies
16030 Enterprise Technologies 15.234.00 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation
16031 Envirowin Software, Inc. 311.00 Software
16032 Equipment Life Technology 287.32 Mechanical Supplies
16033 EDE International, Inc. 4,168.61 Risk Assessment-Y2K Project
16034 Federal Express Corp. 58.95 Air Freight
n 16035 Fisher Scientific 268.86 Lab Supplies
Y 16036 Flo-Systems, Inc. 65.38 Pump Supplies
16037 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying 320.00 Engineering Services P-150
16038 Fountain Valley Camera 281.83 Photo Supplies
16039 Fountain Valley Florist 11.00 Benevolence Flowers Balance
16040 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 463.12 Paint Supplies
16041 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 315.00 Truck Wash Tickets
16042 Franklin Covey 332.48 Office Supplies
16043 City of Fullerton 365.54 Water Use
16044 G.E. Supply Company 3,395.58 Electric Parts
16045 G.F.O.A. 1,242.00 Training Registration
16046 General Binding Corporation 67.95 Printing
16047 GTE California 2,110.79 Telephone Services
16048 George Yardley Co. 684.68 Lab Supplies
16049 WW Grainger, Inc. 244.09 Compressor Supplies
16050 Graphic Distributors 469.36 Photographic Supplies
16051 Graseby STI 1,437.32 Engine Supplies
16052 Great American Pdnting Co. 579.26 Printing Service
16053 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 151.60 Janitorial Supplies
16054 GTE Telephone Co.#2 30.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16055 GTE Telephone Operations 409.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16056 Harbour Engineering Group 14,283.14 Mechanical Parts
16057 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples
16058 Harrington Industrial Plastics 927.56 Plumbing Supplies
16059 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 22.22 Truck Supplies
16060 Herman Miller 432.99 Office Supplies
16061 Hilton, Farnkopf&Hobson, LLC 7,078.18 Consulting Services-Office Support Study
16062 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 19.25 Compressor Parts
18063 Home Depot 2,383.23 Small Hardware&Carpet for Plant 2 Basement Room
16064 City of Huntington Beach 18.609,92 Water Use
16065 The Huntington 3.050.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16066 Imaging Plus, Inc. 406.40 Office Supplies
16067 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 188.17 Connectors
16068 Inland Press 37.87 Publications
16069 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use
16070 IBM Corporation 2,360.33 Service Contract
16071 IPCO Safety-Ca 9,430.28 Safety Supplies
16072 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 585.08 Instrument Supplies
rr 16073 James Engineering, Inc. 2,367.12 Consulting Services-Benchmarking Project
y 16074 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 20,790.00 Miscellaneous Construction Services
u, 16075 Johnstone Supply 489.83 Electrical Supplies
16076 Junior's Tools 430.95 Mechanical Supplies
16077 Kelly Paper 293.41 Paper
16078 Knox Industrial Supplies 436.41 Tools
16079 Krieger&Stewart, Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services P1-64
16080 KMI Industries, Inc. 410.53 Piping Supplies
16081 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 88.16 Safely Supplies
16082 LaserAll Corp. 168.53 Service Agreement
16083 Law/Crandall 1,322.07 Soil Testing 7-13-94
16084 LaMode Company 248.22 Sulfide Test Kit
16085 Lustre-Cal 372.41 Safety Supplies
16086 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,698.95 Cellular Telephone Service
16087 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 22,391.05 Engineering Services 2-37
16088 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.187.00 Welding Supplies
16089 Mamco International 139.00 Janitorial Supplies
16090 Mar Vac Electronics 150.88 Instrument Supplies
16091 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 7.115.60 Pump Supplies
16092 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 420.39 Tools
16093 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 613.36 Auto Parts&Supplies
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16094 Medlin Controls Co. 1.013.87 Instrument Supplies
16095 Mesa Muffler 348.00 Truck Supplies
16096 Micro Flex 568.00 Gloves
16097 Mid-West Associates 9.559.75 Pump Supplies
16098 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 16,578.20 Pump Supplies&Mechanical Repairs
16099 Mission Uniform Service 4.282.29 Uniform Rentals
16100 Monitor Labs, Inc. 978.93 Instruments
16101 The Monster Board 350.00 Job Posting on the Internet
16102 Moody's Investors Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
16103 Morton Salt 549.63 Salt
16104 Motion Industries 145.37 Pump Supplies
16105 MotoPhoto 14.58 Photographic Services
16106 Mine Safety Appliances Company 1,260.65 Safety Supplies
16107 National Plant Services, Inc. 23,257.50 Vacuum Truck Services
161 D8 Neal Supply Co. 590.09 Plumbing Supplies
16109 Network Construction Services 4,119.23 Construction Services-Wiring
r 16110 New Hermes, Inc. 32.86 Tools
r* 16111 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 865.69 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
110 16112 Norms Refrigeration 170.24 Electric Pans
16113 Office Depot Business Services 1,202.01 Office Supplies
16114 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 2,240.00 Temporary Employment Services
16115 Ingram Micro 150.00 Subscription
16116 Orange County Wholesale Electric 364.84 Instrument Supplies
16117 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 57.83 Fittings
16118 Ortiz Fire Protection 1,295.00 Service Agreement
16119 Oxygen Service Company 1,779.03 Specialty Gases
16120 OCB Reprographics 266.36 Printing Service-Spec P-173
16121 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 287.82 Electrical Supplies
16122 Pacific Bell 36.90 Telephone Services
16123 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services
16124 Pacific Publishers 153.40 Subscription
16125 Parts Unlimited 7.63 Truck Supplies
16126 Petco Animal Supplies 54.92 Lab Supplies
16127 Pinnacle One 4.017.50 Consulting Services 5-37-3
16128 Polydyne, Inc. 8,091.46 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16129 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin.
16130 Prima 48.50 Publication
16131 Printers Parts 32.41 Office Supplies
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 12/1198 to 12/15/98 .
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
18132 Prosum Information Technologies 4,772.00 Consulting Services-Internet Application Development
16133 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service
16134 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
16135 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 1,999.36 Trash Removal
16136 Ralphs Grocery Co.#23 282.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16137 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1,856.90 Electrical Supplies
16138 Remedy 3,178.33 Temporary Employment Services
16139 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 249.32 Metal
16140 Ryerson Tull Wholesale 810.81 Storage Containers
16141 RPM Electric Motors 2,678.06 Electric Motor Supplies
16142 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 373.79 Paint Supplies
16143 Safelite Glass Corp. 256.36 Auto Supplies
16144 SantaFe Industrial Products 122.94 Mechanical Supplies
16145 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 481.00 Lab Repairs
p1 16146 Second-Sun 5D4.87 Light Fixtures
16147 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 122.84 Tools
16148 ShowCase Corporation 1,293.00 Software-Annual Malnt. Contract
rt 16149 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 625.67 Tools/Hardware
y 16150 Southern California Air Cond. 355.94 Electrical Supplies
16151 Spintex Company,Inc. 6.992.98 Janitorial Supplies
16152 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. 30.36 Pump Supplies
10153 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 548.54 Janitorial Supplies
16154 Successories, Inc. 89.86 Mechanical Supplies
16155 Summit Steel 179.78 Metal
16156 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 236.46 Mechanical Supplies
16157 Super Chem Corporation 484.88 Chemicals
16158 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
16159 SCTC Institute 95.00 Registration
16160 Tetra Tech EM, Inc. 2.000.00 Technical Assistance-Workshop Services
16161 The Register 808.50 Notices&Ads
16162 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 432.00 Lab Services
16163 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 131.47 Mechanical Supplies
16164 Thompson Publishing Group 248.00 Publication
16165 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 2.195.92 Locks&Keys
16166 Aerofund Financialfrop Hat Productions 259.85 Catering Services
16167 Transcat 319.56 Electrical Supplies
16168 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 238.13 Truck Supplies
16169 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 402.00 Lab Services
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 1211/98 to 12116/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16170 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 24,310.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16171 TCH Associates, Inc. 900.86 Lab Supplies
16172 TEKsystems 880.00 Temporary Employment Services
16173 U.S.Postal Service 81.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16174 Ultra Scientific 471.06 Lab Supplies
16175 United Parcel Service 25.07 Parcel Services
16176 Unocal 76 72.90 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
16177 Valoom 20,153.79 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
16178 Valley Cities Supply Company 414.82 Plumbing Supplies
16179 VWR Scientific Products 199.12 Lab Supplies
16180 Wells Supply Co. 1,579.64 Plumbing Supplies
16181 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 380.76 Electrical Supplies
16182 Xerox Corporation 12,670.07 Copier Leases
16183 YCA&Associates 1,590.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees
16184 CNA Trust 7,584.10 Construction 541-1
16186 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 857.65 Training Expense Reimb.
16186 Jeffrey Brown 250.00 Employee Travel Advance
r* 16187 Jeffrey L. Jones 250.00 Employee Travel Advance
16188 Donald F, McIntyre 444.11 Meeting Expense Reimb.
o' 16189 Antonin Fire 1,155.08 Training Expense Reimb.
16190 Edwin D. Ralledge 117.00 Training Expense Reimb.
16191 Merrill F. Seiler 28.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
16192 "ALGENZ NAMS Account" 251.66 Publications
16193 United Rent-All 300.00 Misc. Rentals
16194 County of Orange 3,270.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16195 Fry's Electronics and Wm. Ontiveros 611.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
16196 NexCom and Wm. Ontiveros 899.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
16197 Orange County Sanitation District 895.04 Petty Cash Reimb.
16198 Orange County Sanitation District 12,605.27 Workers Comp. Reimb.
16199 Sam Ash Music Stores 297.38 Electrical Supplies
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,050,808.65
Payroll Disbursements
11749-11897 Employee Paychecks $ 168.391.21 Biweekly Payroll 12/2198
12045-12045 Employee Paycheck 6,931.39 Termination Payoffs
12202-12223 Directors'Paychecks 4,820.20 Payroll 12115/98
32879-33318 Direct Deposit Statements 602,791.98 Biweekly Payroll 1212/98
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 802,934.78
Page 8 of 9
t •o
Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12115/98 a
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Wire Transfer Payments
Texas Commerce Bank $ 150.391.03 December Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Texas Commerce Bank 207.095.35 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank 8 Trust 175,197.66 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Stale Street Bank S Trust 84,037.66 December FGIC Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 616,721.70
Total Claims Paid 1211198-12115198 $ 4,470,465.13
1
Y
rt
q
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 12/16198 to 12/31/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable•Warrants
16200 Duke Energy Trading 8 Marketing $ 66,817.70 Natural Gas-Spec#P•170
16201 Orange County Sanitation District 509,307.81 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
16202 Southern California Edison 45.245.26 Power
16203 Western States Chemical, Inc. 30.592.87 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
16204 Wal-Con Construction Company 265,000.00 Construction 5-37-3
16205 American Diabetes Association 100.00 Benevolence
16206 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
16207 Pongsakdi Cady 132.50 Training Expense Reimb.
16208 Cappo,Inc. 300.00 Conference Registration
16209 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
16210 James E.Colston 121.50 Meeting Expense Reimb.
16211 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
16212 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
16213 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
16214 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
16215 Inti Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,760.13 Dues Deduction
16215 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
r' 16217 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
r* 16218 OCFA 582.62 Dues Deduction
T 16219 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
16220 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
16221 Peace Officers Council of CA 846.00 Dues Deduction
16222 Pioneer Publications, Inc. 3,200.00 Notices 8 Ads
16223 Radisson Hotel Sacramento 109.00 Training Registration
16224 So.Cal.Gas Company 20,110.74 Natural Gas
16225 Southern California Edison 6,017.67 Power
16226 State of California 135.62 Hazardous Waste Tax
16227 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions
16228 Marco Polo S.Velasce 236.75 Training Expense Reimb.
16229 Bristol Systems, Inc. 37,844.15 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
16230 Brown And Caldwell 36,772.45 Engineering Services J-35-1
16231 Delta Dental 38.333.64 Dental Insurance Plan
16232 James Martin 8 Co. 99,792.50 Data Integration Project
16233 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 79,385.73 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
16234 Margate Construction 47,325.00 Construction Pt-36-2
16235 Network Catalyst 51,681.00 Computer Supplies
16236 Parsons Engineering Science 104,736.52 Engineering Services J-42
16237 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 78,110.82 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16238 Polydyne, Inc. 43.776.26 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16239 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 104,665.03 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
16240 Spec Services,Inc. 49,752.63 Engineering Services J-33-1
Page 1 of 7 „
Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12131198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16241 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 220,400.39 Construction 7-7-1
16242 Systems Integrated 27.964.80 Construction J-31-3
16243 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 78.611.56 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16244 United HealthCare 130,208.53 Medical Health Insurance
16246 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 39.626.87 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
16246 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 53,162.66 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
16247 The Vantage Group LLC 272.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
16248 American Telephone&Telegraph 5.54 Long Distance Telephone Services
16249 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.242.50 Engine Testing J-19
16250 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.20 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89
16251 Airborne Express 68.95 Air Freight
16252 Allied Supply Company 2,828.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16263 American Management Association 298.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription
16254 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services
16255 Applied Industrial Technology 216.98 Pump Supplies
16258 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
16257 Awards&Trophies By Bea 73.96 Plaques
16258 AWSI 163.00 Dept.of Transportation Training Program
r 16259 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 1,100.00 Telephone Installation
r* 16260 Battery Specialties 312.78 Batteries
16261 Beta Technology,Inc. 470.97 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
N 16262 Bloomberg L.P. 5.268.98 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93
16263 Bolas Radiator Service 65.00 Truck Repairs
16264 Bush&Associates,Inc. 6.314.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
16265 C.S.U.F. Foundation 8,750.00 Professional Services-Center for Demographic Research
16266 Cal-Finance Journal 49.00 Subscription
16267 California Auto Refrigeration 531.27 Service Agreement
16268 Calolympic Safety 399.81 Safety Supplies
16269 Caltrol, Inc. 11,086.41 Valves
16270 Career Track Seminars MS2 395.00 Training Registration
16271 Carollo Engineers 18.181.89 Engineering Services Pl-36&P2-42
16272 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Eng 975.00 Engineering Services P1 S3
16273 Centrepoinle Commercial Interiors 6.001.07 Office Furniture
16274 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 808.45 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene
18275 Huntington Beach Medical Center 3.080.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16276 Communications Perfomwnce Group 9,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program
16277 Computers America,Inc. 396.48 Computer Supplies
16278 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2,604.82 Electricel Supplies
16279 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 129.35 Plumbing Supplies
16280 Converse Consultants 15,552.15 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
16281 Corporate Express 629.04 Office Supplies
16282 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 98.45 Truck Parts
Page 2 of 7
Claims Paid From 12/16/98 to 12/31/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16283 Cotelllgent 750.00 Training Registration
16284 County of Orange 611.01 Communication Service Agreement
16285 County Wholesale Electric Co. 663.61 Electrical Supplies
16286 Culligan of Orange County 3.693.50 Water Softener Tank&Service
16287 CASA 540.00 Meeting Registration
16288 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 552.77 Lab Supplies
16289 David E.Libert, Ph.D. 1.625.00 Professional Services-Management Training
16290 - Dell Marketing L.P. 14.864.11 5 Dell Computer Workstations
16291 DeZudck 2.333.49 Valves
16292 Diamond H Recognition 1.918.66 Employee Service Awards
18293 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 289.18 Paint Supplies
16294 DGA Consultants, Inc. 4.752.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
16295 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1.416.00 Medical Screening
16296 Elecrio Numerics,Inc. 159.91 Electrical Supplies
16297 Enchanter, Inc. 3.500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
16298 Entek IRD International 943A9 Instrument Supplies
16299 Enterprise Technologies 22.900-10 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&V2K Project
16300 Federal Express Corp. 34.00 Air Freight
16301 Filter Supply Company 5,182.85 Filters
ram+ 16302 Flo-Systems,Ina 3,905.93 Pump Supplies
t`s 16303 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,497.88 Long Term Disability Premium
w 16304 Fountain Valley Camera 53.67 Photo Supplies
16305 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 31.99 Truck Wash Tickets
16306 Foxboro Company 2,412.82 Instrument Supplies
16307 Franklin Covey 492.85 Office Supplies
16308 Fred Pryor Seminars 684.00 Training Registration
16309 Fry's Electronics 576.89 Computer Supplies
16310 Freiman,David A.&Kerry L. 5,000.00 Temporary Construction Easement 7-17
16311 G.E.Supply Company 899.24 Electric Pam
16312 Ganahl Lumber Company 230.59 Lumber/Hardware
16313 GTE California 8,211.26 Telephone Services
16314 W W Grainger,Inc. 478.13 Compressor Supplies
16315 Great American Printing Co. 267.79 Printing Service
16316 Voided Check - -
16317 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 122.84 Janitorial Supplies
16318 GLA-ARMA 125.00 Training Registration
16319 Hach Company 1.881.77 Lab Supplies
16320 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice
16321 Harvard Business Review 86.00 Subscription
16322 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 543.46 Truck Supplies
16323 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 37AO Catering Services
16324 Hewlett-Packard 174.04 Lab Supplies
Page 3 of 7 �, .,
p1 n
Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12/31/98
Wamant No. Vendor Amount Description
16325 Hilti, Inc. 1,006.84 Tools
16326 Hilton,Famkopf 8 Hobson,LLC 9,683.41 Consulting Services-Office Support Study
16327 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 1,716.91 Compressor Parts
16328 Home Depot 451.71 Small Hardware
16329 Hub Auto Supply 287.17 Truck Parts
16330 City of Huntington Beach 8.529.77 Water Use
16331 Imaging Plus,Inc. 331.68 Office Supplies
16332 Industrial Filter Manufacturer 2,459.20 Filters
16333 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 142.99 Connectors
16334 Information For Public Affairs 165,00 Online Service
16335 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc. 91.46 Truck Supplies
16336 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.00 Water Use
16337 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
16338 IPCO Safety-Ca 984.23 Safety Supplies
16339 James N.Darlington 1,400.00 Consulting Services-Lab
16340 Jay's Catering 1,238.16 Catering Services
16341 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 23.070.07 Medical Insurance Premium
S 16342 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,224.82 Tools
c 16343 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 144.11 Safety Supplies
n 16344 LaserAll Corp. 5,000.85 Service Agreement
m 16345 Law/Crandall 5,476.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182
16346 Lee Ann Graham/WERF 10.00 Publication
16347 Lewoo Electric Co. 118.53 Truck Supplies
16348 Lustre-Cal 372AI Safety Supplies
16349 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 7,972.34 Engineering Services 2-37
16350 Maintenance Technology Corp. 640.57 Welding Supplies
16351 Mamce International 694.99 Janitorial Supplies
16352 Mantek 836.29 Safety Supplies
16353 Mar Vac Electronics 1,966.29 Instrument Supplies
16354 Marriott Rancho Las Palmas Resort 310.00 Meeting Registration
16355 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3.954.18 Instrument Supplies
16356 Mc Junkin Corp. 2,193.01 Plumbing Supplies
16357 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.510.77 Tools
16358 Metier, Inc. 1.200.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project
16359 Micro Flex 284.00 Gloves
16360 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 9.233.87 Mechanical Repairs
16361 Mission Uniform Service 3,213.23 Uniform Rentals
16362 Moreland 8 Associates 6,769.25 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95
16363 Morgan Company 6,869.07 V-269 Pull Rig Repairs
16364 Morton Salt 562.29 Salt
16365 MotoPholo 183.87 Photographic Services
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 1211SMS to 12/31/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16366 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 111.27 Publications 8 Books
16367 Neal Supply Co. 977.02 Plumbing Supplies
16368 Nextel Communications 1,722.34 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time
16369 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,356.96 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
16370 The Norco Companies 22.50 Mail Delivery Service
16371 Office Depot Business Services 1,022.13 Office Supplies
16372 Olsson Construction,Inc. 22.190.60 Construction P2-39-1
16373 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 1.981.00 Temporary Employment Services
16374 Olympus America, Inc. 14.987.97 Videoimagescope B Accessories
16375 Orange County Wholesale Electric 239.71 Instrument Supplies
16376 Oxygen Service Company 1.087.19 Specialty Gases
16377 OCB Reprographics 13,648.43 Printing Service-Spec P-173
16378 Pacific Bell 1.203.62 Telephone Services
16379 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,356.01 Plumbing Supplies
16380 Pacific Publishers 58.56 Publication
16381 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 179.55 Tires
4 16382 Parts Unlimited 214.12 Truck Supplies
16383 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 599.12 Filters
16384 Petco Animal Supplies 47.38 Lab Supplies
M 16385 Pinnacle One 5,136.00 Consulting Services 5-37-3
tp 16386 Pitney Bowes 352.35 Postage Machine Service Agreement
u' 16387 PCI: Poly-Corr Industries 21.55 Janitorial Supplies
16388 Power Distributors, Inc. 4,500.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation
16389 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin.
16390 Procurement Services Associates 3,465.90 Professional Services-Purchasing Survey
16391 Prosum Information Technologies 2,050.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development
16392 PIHRA 99.00 Meeting Registration
16393 Quantema, Inc. 950.00 Analytical Service
16394 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,323.92 Trash Removal
16395 Reliastar 21,534.17 Life Insurance Premium
16396 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,167.72 Life Insurance Premium
16397 Remedy 8,197.42 Temporary Employment Services
16398 Robert Bein,William Frost 8 Assoc. 10,600.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1
16399 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 471.20 Auto Repair
16400 Rosemount/Uniloc 665.93 Instrument Supplies
16401 RPM Electric Motors 1,734.92 Electric Motor Supplies
16402 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 103.86 Paint Supplies
16403 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,044.25 Mechanical Supplies
16404 Saratoga Institute 999.00 Training Registration
16405 Srantech,Inc. 315.00 Printing Service-Sewer System Atlas
16406 Schwing America,Inc. 1.679.23 Pump Supplies
16407 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,965.07 Specialty Gases
Page 5of7 a ,
Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12131/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16408 City of Seal Beach 180.30 Water Use
16409 Second-Sun 311.93 Light Fixtures
16410 Self-Insurance Plans 1,494.92 State Workers'Compensation User Funding&Fraud Assessment
16411 Shannonside Construction 14,385.00 Construction-Plant 2 Surge Towers Sidewalk
18412 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,231.45 Tools/Hardware
16413 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
16414 So.Cal.Gas Company 24.84 Natural Gas
16415 Southern California Marine Institute 3,053.00 Equipment Rental-Ocean Monitoring Vessel
16418 So.California SL-1 Users Association 75.00 Membership
16417 Sprint 46.05 Long Distance Telephone Service
16418 Staples Direct 107.74 Office Supplies
16419 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
16420 Sunset Ford 403.11 Truck Supplies
16421 Swaths Electric Motor Service 1,590,69 Pump
16422 By Nielson Service, Inc. 816.00 Lab Calibration Service
16423 SCESA 160.00 Membership
16424 SKC-West, Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies
16425 Tasew, Inc. 1,520.93 Valves
rt 16426 Taylor-Dunn 930.69 Electric Cart Parts
16427 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,071.15 Mechanical Supplies
16428 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
o' 16429 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 263.99 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
16430 Tran Consulting Engineers 22,400.00 Engineering Services P1-65
16431 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 15,115.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
16432 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 327.50 Truck Supplies
16433 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,390.00 Lab Services
16434 Thorpe Insulation 62.61 Plumbing Supplies
16435 Union Dodge 22,632.89 Dodge Ram Maxivan
16436 United Parcel Service 60.29 Parcel Services
16437 Unocal 76 13.16 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3
16438 Valmm 6,090.52 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
16439 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,084.62 Plumbing Supplies
16440 Verne's Plumbing 4,435.00 Plumbing Supplies
16441 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,482.30 Vision Service Premium
16442 VWR Scientific Products 3,548.36 Lab Supplies
16443 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,516.31 Security Guards
16444 Water Environment Federation 260.00 Publication
16445 Water Policy Report 695.00 Publication
16446 Waxie Sanitary Supply 680.65 Janitorial Supplies
16447 Wells Supply Co. 174.89 Plumbing Supplies
16448 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 151.31 Electrical Supplies
16449 Westrux International 266.75 Truck Supplies
Page 6 of 7
Claims Paid From 12116198 to 12131/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16450 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 3,899.50 Valves
16451 Wilmington Instrument Co., Inc. 204.63 Equipment Repair
16452 WEF-Registration Dept. 590.00 Meeting Registration
16453 Xerox Corporation 3,018.80 Copier Leases
16454 Kirk Xpedex Paper&Graphics 106.61 Office Supplies
16455 Marcus D.Dubois 150.00 Employee Travel Advance
16456 Thomas J. Mendez 989.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
16457 County of Orange 1,755.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16458 Government Finance Officers Assoc. 480.00 Financial Reporting Review Fee
16459 Orange County Sanitation District 777.70 Petty Cash Reimb.
16460 EK Development Corporation 10.400.00 Wheeler Ridge Option Agreement MO 11-18-98
16461 Orange County Sanitation District 408.649.28 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
16462 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
16463 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
16464 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
16465 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.760.13 Dues Deduction
F7 16466 Office Depot Business Services 291.63 Office Supplies
16467 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
H. 16468 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction
't 16469 Poypure,Inc.&for Polydyne, Inc. 1,443.32 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16470 Stale of California 97.53 Hazardous Waste Tax
16471 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions
16472 Orange County Sanitation District 4.865.12 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,318,483.11
Payroll Disbursements
11898-12044 Employee Paychecks $ 195.966.02 Biweekly Payroll 12/16/98
12046-12201 Employee Paychecks 199.467.99 Leave Accrual Payoffs
12224-12227 Employee Paychecks 3,355.75 Leave Accrual Payoffs
12228-12372 Employee Paychecks 193,835.30 Biweekly Payroll 12/30/98
12373-12374 Employee Paychecks 7,464.43 Termination&Accrual Payoffs
33319.34201 Direct Deposit Statements 1,265,226.11 Biweekly Payroll 12116&12/30/98
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1.865.315.60
Wire Transfer Payments
None
Total Claims Paid 12/16/98-12/31/98 $ 5.183.798.71
Page 7 of •, _.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date I T°ed or Dir.
2129/99
AGENDA REPORT I
Item Number IrenPmber
Orange County Sanitation District S(
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEGA FINDINGS
N/A
R.. utwpaeVn32INbeps\NPrLLEStlamwa me
nmu.a. Erwva Page 1
ATTACHMENTS
r
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 1/1/99 -1/15/99 & 1/16/99 — 1/31/99.
BA
\Yi'W.i ta11ay 0x
a....a Wa Page 2
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
16473 Brown And Caldwell $ 121,457.75 Engineering Services Pi-37
16474 Canus Corporation 58,737.67 Fiber Optic Cable
16475 Carollo Engineers 39,229A7 Engineering Services P1-36&P242
16476 CH2MHil1 94.470.58 Engineering Services J-31-3
16477 Dell Marketing L.P. 61.039.32 10 Dell Computer Workstations&9 Dell Notebook Computers
16478 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 81,090.00 Painting Maint.Services MO4-22-98
16479 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 72,488.10 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170
16480 Intergraph Corporation 35,732.58 Software J42
16481 Parsons Engineering Science 117,696.16 Engineering Services J42
16482 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 82,306.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16483 Science Applications Ind.,Corp. 40.507.62 Ocean Monitoring MO6-3-94
16484 Southern California Edison 46.243.00 Power
16485 Tule Ranch(Magan Fame 57,155.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16486 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 76,030.20 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5
16487 First Fire Systems,Inc. 63,826.28 Construction Contract J-67 MO 2.25.98
16488 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 138.209.73 Construction 7-17
16489 Margate Construction, Inc. 209.211.00 Construction Pt-36-2
16490 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 227,319.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
16491 The Vantage Group LLC 1,830.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
16492 AT&T 25.89 Long Distance Telephone Services
16493 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.85 Long Distance Telephone Services
16494 American Telephone&Telegraph 477.31 Long Distance Telephone Services
16495 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 594.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16496 Airborne Express 54.00 Air Freight
16497 Allied Supply Company 4,075.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16498 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 144.56 Instrument Supplies
16499 American Airlines 1.870.00 Travel Services
16500 Anixter, Inc. 247.93 Computer Supplies
16501 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 595.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
16502 Appleone Employment Service 10.768.29 Temporary Employment Services
16503 Armor-Vac 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16504 Audio Video Reporting Services 139.31 Audio Video Services
16505 Awards&Trophies By Bea 78.33 Plaques
16506 Azur Environmental 1.250.19 Lab Supplies
16507 Assoc.of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 475.00 Meeting Registration
16508 ASR Analysis 1,200.00 Vibration Analysis 7.7-1
16509 AWSI 229.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
16510 Baker Process 12,935.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16511 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,625.20 Telephone Installation
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16512 Battery Specialties 110.07 Batteries
16513 Belisle&Associates 150.80 Publications
16514 Bernardo Press 157.85 Publications
16515 Bio Gro Division 17,566.48 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
16516 Black Box Corporation 275.04 Computer Supplies
16517 Brinderson Corp 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
16518 Bristol Systems,Inc. 11,012.08 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
16519 Burke Engineering Co. 915.79 Electrical Supplies
16520 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,912.00 Surveying Services MO 6-26-97
16521 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 91.15 Rope
16622 Calif Centrifugal Pump 5,676.00 Pump Supplies
16523 California Automatic Gate 2,157.58 Service Agreement
16524 California Relocation Services 312.00 Moving Services
16525 Calolympic Safety 17.97 Safety Supplies
16526 CalTrans-Publication Unit 92.00 Publications
16527 Center for Effective Performance, Inc. 110.00 Once Supplies
16528 Charles King Company, Inc. 4,472A3 Construction 5411-1
16529 Charles P.Crowley Co. 641.55 Instrument Parts
18530 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,NA. 10,502.00 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
16531 Chrome Crankshaft Co. 1.015.00 Pump Supplies
16532 Cole Scientific 208.23 Lab Services
16533 Communication Briefings $9.00 Publications
16534 Compuserve Incorporated 24.95 Computer Services
16535 Computers America, Inc. 1,804.42 Computer Supplies
16538 Connell GM Parts 10.51 Truck Supplies
16537 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,555.14 Electrical Supplies
16538 Consolidated Plastics Company 21.80 Welding Equipment&Supplies
16539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 204.90 Plumbing Supplies
16540 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9,071.83 Engine Supplies
18541 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,432,00 Copier Lease
18542 Corporate Express Imaging 306.05 Computer Supplies
16543 Corporate Express 749.89 Office Supplies
16544 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 1.775.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09
16545 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 54.68 Truck Parts
16546 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,649.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16547 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,843.61 Electrical Supplies
16548 Crane Pro Services 5.049,44 Maintenance Agreement
16649 CNEMetrics, Inc. 26.12 Lab Supplies
16550 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 470.00 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer
16551 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 159.47 Lab Supplies
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1/16199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16552 CR&R Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals
16553 D B Sales 7,973.50 Electrical Supplies
16554 Dapper Tire Co. 2,508.97 Truck Tires
16555 Del Mar Analytical 380.00 Blosolids Analysis
16556 Dover Elevator Company 2,925.30 Elevator Maintenance
16557 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 899.13 Paint Supplies
16558 DMG-Maximus 15,960.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit
16559 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
16560 Enterprise Technologies 8,508.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project
18561 Environmental Resources Associates 910.20 Lab Services
16562 Environmental Data Solutions Group 9.800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into. Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project
16563 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.302.12 Professional Services-Legislative
16564 ESP Industries, Inc. 1.084.87 Mechanical Supplies
16565 Federal Express Corp. 251.80 Air Freight
16566 Filter Supply Company 468.73 Filters
16567 First American Real Estate Solutions 135.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription
16568 Fisher Scientific 533.62 Lab Supplies
16569 Flickinger Company 151.59 Valve
16570 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 8,102.60 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
16571 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 139.50 Truck Wash Tickets
16572 Franklin Covey 340.51 Training Registration&Office Supplies
16573 Fred Pryor Seminars 459.00 Training Registration
16574 Fry's Electronics 1,532.08 Computer Supplies
16575 Ganahl Lumber Company 1,615.11 Lumber/Hardware
16576 GTE California 1,087.16 Telephone Services
16577 Government Institutes, Inc. 392.00 Publications
16578 Grace Huener 1,800.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation
16579 W W Grainger, Inc. 273.15 Compressor Supplies
16680 Graybar Electric Company 1,863.81 Electrical Supplies
16681 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 380.73 Janitorial Supplies
16582 GLI International,Inc. 1,844.64 Instrument Supplies
16583 Harbour Engineering Group 19,131.89 Pump Supplies
16584 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4.014.67 Truck Supplies
16585 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 134.95 Catering Services
18586 Highway Products 5,114.28 Tool Boxes
16587 Hilti, Inc. 946.01 Tools
16588 The Holman Group 731.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium
16589 Hopkins Technical Products 248.74 Pump Supplies
16590 Horizon Technology 154.62 Lab Supplies
16591 How Magazine 34.96 Subscription
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 1/1199 to 1/15/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16692 Hub Auto Supply 268.44 Truck Parts
16593 City of Huntington Beach 13,260.83 Water Use
16594 Hydrotex 1,749.82 Lube Oil
16595 HWA Sales, Inc. 3,262.76 Electrical Supplies
16596 Imaging Plus,Inc. 630.51 Office Supplies
16597 Impulse 170.61 Mechanical Supplies
16598 Industrial Steam 438.46 Electrical Supplies
16599 Infilcc Degremont. Inc. 159.10 Mechanical Parts
16600 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service
16601 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 107.52 Lab Supplies
16602 Irvine Ranch Water District 17.82 Water Use
16603 IBM Corporation 3,912.12 Service Contract
16604 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
16605 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.684.10 Safety Supplies
16606 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 772.74 Instrument Supplies
16607 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 4,685.25 Training Expenses
16608 Jay's Catering 217.37 Catering Services
16609 Jensen Instruments Co. 657.79 Gauge
16610 Johnstone Supply 767.16 Electrical Supplies
16611 JTA Factors 688.75 Business Forms-Checks
16612 K.P.Lindstrom 6,750.00 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
16613 Kemiron PacKc, Inc. 7,697.96 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
16614 Kennedy Hydraulics 343.79 Motor Repairs
16615 Kimmede Bros.,Inc. 580.96 Mechanical Parts
16616 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,068.60 Tools
16817 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 328.81 Safety Supplies
16618 Lee&Ro,Inc. 19,412.52 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94
16619 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,999.13 Cellular Telephone Service
16620 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,218.33 Welding Supplies
16621 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 180.93 Tools
16622 Medlin Controls Co. 4,620.44 Instrument Supplies
16623 Mesa Muffler 100.81 Truck Supplies
16624 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves
16625 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 3,578.66 HP LaserJet 8100DN Printer
16626 Mid-West Associates 6,208.60 Pump Supplies
16627 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,750.00 Mechanical Repairs
16628 Milltronics, Inc. 462.92 Electrical Supplies
16629 Mission Uniform Service 589.78 Uniform Rentals
16630 Montgomery Hardware Company 774.00 Door-Plant 2 Maim. Bldg.
16631 MotoPhotc 3.60 Photographic Services
Page 4 of 9 E
c .
Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1116199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16632 MPS Photographic Services, Inc. 14.01 Photographic Services
16633 National Plant Services, Inc. 4,500.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16634 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 28.04 Publications&Books
16635 Voided Check - -
16636 Neal Supply Co. 1.005.20 Plumbing Supplies
16637 Newark Electronics 33.00 Instrument Supplies
16638 City of Newport Beach 59.98 Water Use
16639 Nextel Communications 1.154.45 Cellular Phones&Air Time
16640 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,504.81 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
16641 The Norco Companies 92.00 Mail Delivery Service
16642 NRDC Publications Department 13.75 Publication
16643 Office Depot Business Services 2.928.36 Office Supplies
16644 The Ohman Corporation 516.26 Instrument Supplies
16645 Olympus America, Inc. 13.430.61 Videoimagescope&Accessories
16646 Oracle Education 3,333.00 Training Registration
16647 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,455.55 Electrical Supplies
16648 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,347.20 Fittings
16649 Oxygen Service Company 2,391.83 Specialty Gases
16650 OCS Reprographics 246.20 Printing Service-Spec P-173
16651 Pacific Bell 36.13 Telephone Services
16652 Pacific Mechanical Supply 114.99 Plumbing Supplies
16653 Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. 278.32 Instrument Supplies
16654 Pacificare of Ca. 24,889.48 Health Insurance Premium
16655 Paco/Johnston Pump 351.96 Pump Supplies
16656 Padre Janitorial Supplies 64.65 Janitorial Supplies
16657 Pagenet 1,671.84 Rental Equipment
16658 Parts Unlimited 223.03 Truck Supplies
16659 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 189.90 Filters
16660 Pitney Bowes 2.240.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
16661 Polydyne, Inc. 4.568.19 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16662 Power Probe 1.739.65 Electro Brake Bleeder w/Adaptors
16663 Prosum Information Technologies 2,923.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development
16664 Reliastar 8,048.00 Life Insurance Premium
16665 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.167.72 Life Insurance Premium
16666 RM Controls 256.93 Instrument Supplies
16667 RPM Electric Motors 12.956.01 Electric Motor Repair
16668 Safelite Glass Corp. 306.46 Auto Supplies
16689 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,774.74 Mechanical Supplies
16670 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fussy Filter Test Unit Installment
16671 Sce8 Specialty Gases, Inc. 639.99 Specialty Gases
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1/16/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16672 Sears 150.83 Mechanical Supplies
16673 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.344.99 Tools/Hardware
16674 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 12,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
16675 Skalar,Inc. 209.00 Pump Supplies
16676 SkillPalh Seminars 399.00 Training Registration
16677 Snap-On Incorporated 32.37 Tools
16678 Southern California Water 56.55 Water Use
16679 Sparkleas 1.649.60 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
16680 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. 93.52 Pump Supplies
16681 Sterna Cells, Inc. 195.04 Lab Supplies
16682 Strata International,Inc, 926.98 Chemicals
16683 Summit Steel 107.24 Metal
16684 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals
16685 Taylor-Dunn 30.08 Electric Can Parts
16686 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.068.98 Mechanical Supplies
16687 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
16688 Tomell&Cotten 325.90 Legal Services
16889 Troemner,Inc. 766.76 Lab Equipment Calibration Services
16690 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 538.74 Truck Supplies
16691 TEKsystems 2,915.00 Temporary Employment Services
16692 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Lab Water Purification System Maim.
16693 The Unlsource Corporadon 6.361.56 Paper Supplies
16694 United Parcel Service 959.27 Parcel Services
16695 Valcom 11,284.98 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
16696 Valley Cities Supply Company 917.08 Plumbing Supplies
16697 Veme's Plumbing 250.00 Plumbing Supplies
16698 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,394.10 Vision Service Premium
16699 Vortex Corp. 287.97 Door Repair
18700 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 9,689.14 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
16701 VWR Scientific Products 5,499.11 Lab Supplies
16702 Waxie Sanitary Supply 382.41 Janitorial Supplies
16703 Wayne Electric Co. 816.21 Electrical Supplies
16704 Weather Services International 3.459.00 Computer Software Service-Windows
16705 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 703.81 Safety Supplies
16706 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 1,992.40 Electrical Supplies
16707 Western States Chemical,Inc. 15,581.74 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
16708 Wlteg Scientific 1,056.11 Lab Supplies
16709 Xerox Corporation 10,960.27 Copier Leases
16710 YCA&Associates 6,360.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees
16711 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications
Page 6 of 9 a�
Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16712 CNA Trust 8,447.80 Construction 541-1
16713 Blake Anderson 206.17 Cellular Expense Reimb.
16714 Rick J. Hannappel 557.00 Training Expense Reimb.
16715 County of Orange 2,235.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16716 Orange County Sanitation District 996.88 Petry Cash Reimb.
16717 Orange County Sanitation District 394,165.03 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
16718 WCO Hotels, Inc. 48,739.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16719 Aerochem, Inc. 5,105.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16720 Aluminum Forge 1,936.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16721 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
16722 Boeing North American 107.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16723 Buena Park Community Hospital 667.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16724 Cadillac Plating 501.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16725 Century Laminators#1 1.237.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16726 Claim Jumper Restaurant 549.56 DART Luncheon Expense
16727 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
16728 Columbia West Anaheim Medical 13.034.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16729 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 56.20 Plumbing Supplies
16730 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
16731 CSMFO-1999 Annual Conference 665.00 Seminar Registration
16732 Delru Co. 186.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16733 Details, Inc. 897.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16734 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
16735 Dunham Metal Processing 761.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16736 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
16737 Gunther Athletic Service 509.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16738 Hardly Able Oil Company 203.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16739 Hinckley and Schmitt 1,487.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16740 Huntington Beach Conv. Hospital 1,867.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16741 Imperial Containers 8 Display 173.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16742 Intercem 263.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16743 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
16744 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,788.75 Dues Deduction
16745 ICN Biomedicals 849.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16746 J.R.O.Operations Trust 230.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16747 Kaynar Mfg. Div.of Kaynar Tech. 2,085.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16748 Key Circuit Co. 2.346.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16749 Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, Inc. 75.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16750 Kryler Corporation 350.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16751 KCA Electronics,Inc. 2,751.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16752 La Palma Intercommunity Hospital 2,465.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16753 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 51.16 Safety Supplies
16754 Lacey Custom Linens 131.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16755 LDR 123.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16756 Matrix Circuits, Inc. 410.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16757 Metal Technology, Inc. 780.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16758 Micrometals, Inc.#2 2.441.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16759 Monarch Precision Deburdng Co. 362.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16760 Murrietta Circuits 1,184.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16761 Nubilite Products,Inc. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16762 Omni Metal Finishing 1.757.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16763 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
16764 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
16765 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 234.91 Fittings
16766 OCEI 606.36 Dues Deduction
16767 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 337.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16768 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
16769 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
16770 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
16771 Polydad Laminates,Inc. 330.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16772 Ricoh Electronics 1,063.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16773 Ristorante Mamma Gina 50.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16774 RISC Transport Dynamics 292.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16775 Semiooa 183.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16776 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,065.26 ToolsMardware
16777 Sorm Biomedical 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16778 Speedy Circuits 236.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16779 State of California 136.04 Wage Garnishment
16780 Taormina Industries,Inc.#4 345.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16781 Tayco Engineering 4,495.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16782 Thermoo Systems, Inc. 1,808.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16783 U.S.Filter Corporation 286.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16784 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 314.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16785 Union Foods 1,238.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16786 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions
16787 Universal Circuits, Inc. 2,210.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16788 UOP P09152246B 1.384.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16789 US Postal Service 505.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16790 US Postal Service 232.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16791 Val Circuits#5 1,368.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1115199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16792 Valet Car Wash 531.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
16793 Willamette Industries, Inc. 3.079.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,773,595.75
Payroll Disbursements
12375-12379 Employee Paychecks $ 106.287.29 Severance Payoffs
12380.12520 Employee Paychecks 183,586.27 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99
12521.12522 Employee Paychecks 1,688.02 Termination&Payroll Adjustment
12523-12544 Directors'Paychecks 5.248.64 Payroll 1113/99
12546-12545 Employee Paychecks 1,377.58 Reissue Voided Auto Deposit
34202.34644 Direct Deposit Statements 817,134.66 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 915,322.46
Wiro Transfer Payments
Texas Commerce Bank $ 151,679.61 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Texas Commerce Bank 226.958.62 January Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank&Trust 187,998.08 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 566.530.31
Total Claims Paid 111199-1/15/99 $ 4,255,454.52
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116/99 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
16794 Anna L.Piercy $ 340.00 Director Travel Advance
16795 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 45.803.60 O& M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
16796 Carollo Engineers 29.724.67 Engineering Services Pi-36&P242
16797 Cummins Cal Pacific, Inc. 124,720.63 (2)200 KW Emergency Generators w/frailers
16798 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 76,704.15 Engineering Services 2-41
16799 James Martin&Co. 108,682.50 Data Integration Project
16800 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 144,035.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
16801 Orange County Water District 42,695.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
16802 Pacificare of Ca. 33,622.26 Health Insurance Premium
16803 Pima Gm Systems,Inc. 170.031.19 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
16804 Polydyne, Inc. 39.011.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
16805 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 35,025.23 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
16806 Southern California Edison 31,441.69 Power
16807 SPEC Services,Inc. 96,434.92 Engineering Services J-33-1
16808 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 92,467.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
16809 United HeallhCare 129,809.32 Medical Health Insurance
16810 Valcom 29,781.35 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses
16811 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 73,691.92 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
16812 Water Environment Research Foundation 69,000.00 Membership
16813 Western States Chemical,Inc. 26,827.64 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
16814 The Vantage Group LLC 24,880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
16815 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.82 Long Distance Telephone Services
16816 American Telephone&Telegraph 2,106.01 Long Distance Telephone Services
16817 American Telephone&Telegraph 21.08 Long Distance Telephone Services
16818 AccuStandard 529.88 Lab Supplies
16819 Airgas Lyons Safety 310.42 Safety Supplies
16820 American Society of Civil Engineers' 2,254.50 Registration
16821 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 545.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
16822 Appleone Employment Service 11,746.28 Temporary Employment Services
16823 Applied Industrial Technology 662.13 Pump Supplies
16824 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies
16825 Armor-Vac 1.105.00 Vacuum Truck Services
16826 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
16827 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement
16828 Awards&Trophles By Bea 148.37 Plaques
16829 Azur Environmental 762.53 Lab Supplies
16830 ABM Business Machines, Inc. 1,113.08 Office Supplies
16831 ACT Group Inc. 487.13 Service Agreement
16832 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.592.81 Consulting Services 11-20
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16833 American Compensation Assoc. 930.00 Registration
16834 ARK Technologies 14,212.00 Data Processing
16835 Battery Specialties 1,386.36 Batteries
16836 Bio Gro Division 17,048.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
16837 BioSource Consulting 11,553.73 Consulting Servicce-Biosolids&Watershed
16838 Boyle Engineering Corporation 15,924.94 Engineering Services 7-27
16839 Brinderson Corp 500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
16840 Bristol Systems, Inc. 5,150.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
16841 Bush&Associates,Inc. 11,090.00 Surveying Services MO6-25-97
16842 Business Objects Americas 4,972.85 Software-Data Whse/lntergration Project
16843 Business Week 37.95 Subscription
16844 BuyComp 22,908.48 Computer Supplies-10 Network Switches
16845 BBR Surveying Instruments 111.40 Instrument Supplies
16846 CWEA 45.00 Membership
16847 Calolympic Safety 1.988.95 Safety Supplies
16848 Camali Corp 4,562.50 Service Agreement
16849 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 6.034.15 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-2
16850 Career Track Seminars MS2 596.00 Seminar Registration
16851 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 583.88 Office Furniture
16852 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,444.45 Professional Services-Ergonomic
16853 Color Arts,Inc. 530.00 Vehicle Decals
16854 Compressor Components Of Calif 6,141.75 Pump Supplies
16855 Computers America,Inc. 3,020.87 Computer Supplies
16856 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 478.46 Electrical Supplies
16857 Consolidated Plastics Company 95.40 Welding Equipment&Supplies
16858 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 226.14 Plumbing Supplies
16859 Converse Consultants 1,128.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
16660 Cooper Cameron Corporation 550.00 Engine Supplies
16861 Corporate Express Imaging 369.80 Computer Supplies
16862 Corporate Express 599.42 Office Supplies
16863 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09
16864 Cost Containment Solutions 702.56 Workers Comp.Services
16865 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 45.14 Truck Parts
16866 County of Orange 74.57 Administrative Fees
16867 County of Orange 595.00 Permit Fees
16868 County of Orange 1,335.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
16869 County Wholesale Electric Co. 32.16 Electrical Supplies
16870 Crane Pro Services 11.308.94 Maintenance Agreement
16871 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
16872 Cytec Industries, Inc. 15.477.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16873 CASA 205.00 Conference Registration
16874 CEPA Company 1,010.00 Equipment Maint.Service
16875 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 124.62 Lab Supplies
16876 CR 8 R. Inc. 2.205.00 Container Rentals
16877 CSMFO 40.00 Registration
16878 CWEA 115.00 Registration
16879 Dapper Tire Co. 801.03 Truck Tires
16880 Datavault 219.00 OBshe Back-Up Tape Storage
16881 DataCard Services 459.17 Equipment Maint.
16882 David's Tree Service 450.00 Tree Removal
16883 De Guelle 8 Sons Glass Co. 106.33 Safety Glass
16854 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1,224.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
16885 DTSC 192.00 Hazardous Waste Fee
16886 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 74.00 Medical Screening
16887 Edison EV 7,100.48 EV Charging Station Installation
16888 Electra Bond,Inc. 1,203.57 Mechanical Supplies
16889 Electro Numerics,Inc. 257.00 Electrical Supplies
16890 Electro-Test,Inc. 904.00 Electrical Supplies
16891 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
16892 Enterprise Technologies 11.882.80 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support,FIS/CMMS Integration 8 Y2K Project
16893 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,103.47 Professional Services-Legislative
16894 FIIeNET Corporation 15.731.61 Computer Software
16895 Fisher Scientific 1,292.00 Lab Supplies
18896 Flo-Systems,Inc. 7.466.98 Pump Supplies
16897 Forked Engineering&Surveying 9.840.00 Engineering Services P-150
16898 Franklin Covey 940.90 Office Supplies
16899 Fry's Electronics 162.89 Computer Supplies
16900 FM Intemational,fric. 1.000.00 Service Agreement-RFPfor the Engineering Document Mgmt System
16901 Garraft-Callahan Company 560.30 Chemicals
16902 Gartner Gmup 395.00 Subscription
16903 Gates Fiberglass Installers 750.00 Fiberglass Repair
16904 GTE California 7,792.46 Telephone Services
16905 George T.Hall Co. 1.494.16 Mechanical Supplies
16906 Global Engineering 8 Management 3.690.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention
16907 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service
16908 Grace Huener 2.430.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation
16909 WW Grainger,Inc. 67.43 Compressor Supplies
16910 Graphic Distributors 691.76 Photographic Supplies
16911 Graseby STI 4,305.07 Engine Supplies
16912 Great American Printing Co. 255.99 Printing Service
Page 3 of 9 b
Claims Paid From 1H6199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16913 GE Mullilin Inc. (Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair
16914 GS Edwards Systems Technology 315.00 Lab Equipment Repair
16915 GST, Inc.I Micro City 33.84 Office Supplies
16916 GTE Hawaii 190.86 Telephone Services-3 Way Conference Call
16917 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 439.26 Truck Supplies
16918 Herb's Slackforest Bakery&Deli 68.00 Catering Services
16919 Home Depot 105.02 Small Hardware
16920 Hub Auto Supply 49.19 Truck Parts
16921 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 3.171.50 Software Licenses
16922 HWA Sales,Inc. 1,586.08 Electrical Supplies
16923 Imaging Plus,Inc. 706.53 Office Supplies
16924 Implemented Designs,Inc. 500.00 IT Computer Room Floor Refurbishing
16925 Impulse 211.74 Lab Supplies
16926 Industrial Air Compressor 286.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
16927 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 26.03 Connectors
16928 Information Resources 200.00 Personnel Services
16929 Interstate Battery Systems 501.68 Batteries
16930 Irvine Ranch Water District 54.54 Water Use
16931 IBM Corporation 10,841.33 Service Contract
16932 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,889.27 Safety Supplies
16933 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,281.64 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
16934 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 24,609.26 Mice.Construction Services
16935 Jay's Catering 313.18 Catering Services
16936 Jobtrak 108.00 Notices&Ads
16937 Knowledge Point 1,608.75 Software Maim,Agreement
16938 Knox Industrial Supplies 559.35 Tools
16939 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 808.54 Cellular Telephone Service
16940 LaserAll Corp. 1,204.47 Service Agreement
16941 LaMotte Company 55.57 Sulfide Test Kit
16942 League of Ca.Cities,Orange County Div. 95.00 Publications
16943 Lessons in Leadership 1,116.00 Seminar Registration
16944 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Publications
16945 Liebed, Cassidy&Frierson 1,595.00 Membership
16946 Long Beach Line-X 357.38 Truck Supplies
16947 Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership
16948 JLM Gen.Contracting&Environmental 23,868.00 Manhole Repair
16949 Mar Vac Electronics 21.54 Instrument Supplies
16950 Martin McIntosh Land Surveying 10,609.45 Professional Services-Traffic Study
16951 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3.319.01 Valves
16962 Me Junkin Corp. 209.28 Plumbing Supplies
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16953 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 738.86 Tools
16954 Micro Motion, Inc. 1.152.77 Electrical Supplies
16955 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4.981.89 Mechanical Repairs
16956 Mission Uniform Service 4,531.53 Uniform Rentals
16957 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
16958 Motion Industries 360.12 Pump Supplies
16959 Multiform Systems Corp. 1,876.00 Computer Equip. Services-Fuel Mgmt. System
16960 MPS Photographic Services 16.17 Photographic Services
16961 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
16962 National Assoc.of Regional Councils 275.00 Registration
16963 National Mlcrocomp Services 4.090.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
16964 National Technical Information 82.50 Publications
16965 Neal Supply Co. 2,220.46 Plumbing Supplies
16966 Network Solutions Group 980.00 Cable Installation Specification
16967 New Hermes,Inc. $96.31 Tools
16968 Newark Electronics 718.81 Instrument Supplies
16969 Nextel Communications 688.88 Cellular Phones&Air Time
16970 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 6,917.03 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
16971 Ninyo B Moore 449.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
16972 Northwestern Carbon 1,389.55 Filters
16973 Office Depot Business Services 1.429.59 Office Supplies
16974 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 196.00 Temporary Employment Services
16975 Orange County Sanitation District 19,758.54 Worker's Comp. Reimb.
18976 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 23.77 Plumbing Supplies
16977 Orange County Forum 300.00 Conference Registration
16978 Orange County Sanitation District 418.05 Petty Cash Reimb.
16979 Orange County Wholesale Electric 478.35 Electrical Supplies
16980 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 301.53 Fillings
16981 Oxygen Service Company 1,077.03 Specialty Gases
16982 OCB Reprographics 1,123.51 Printing Service-Spec P-173
16983 Pacific Bell 89.64 Telephone Services
16984 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services
16985 Pacific Mechanical Supply 388.39 Plumbing Supplies
16986 Pacific Publishers 30.78 Publication
16987 Pagenet 1,901.51 Rental Equipment
16988 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 665.59 Time
16989 Parts Unlimited 741.60 Truck Supplies
16990 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 3,520.75 Filters
16991 Petco Animal Supplies 68.99 Lab Supplies
16992 Pinnacle One 34.32 Consulting Services 6-37-3
Page 5 of 9 ti
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
16993 Power Bros. Machine,Inc. 815.36 Mechanical Maint.
16994 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
16995 Public Financial Management, Inc. 7,500.00 Arbitrage Consulting Services
16996 PC Magazine 54.97 Subscription
16997 PCS Express 99.00 Courier Service
16998 PIHRA 90.00 Membership
16999 R. L.Abbott&Associates 2,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
17000 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 414.06 Trash Removal
17001 Randolph Austin Co. 666.00 Lab Supplies
17002 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
17003 Regents of University of Calif. 330.00 Registration
17004 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1.286.41 Electrical Supplies
17005 Remedy 7,191.04 Temporary Employment Services
17006 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 450.00 Video Production Service
17007 RPM Electric Motors 296.31 Electric Motor Repair
17008 Safety-Kleen 840.00 Service Agreement
17009 Sand Dollar Business Forms 310.32 Printing Supplies
17010 SantaFe Industrial Products 466.46 Mechanical Supplies
17011 Sanorius Corporation 195.80 Publications
17012 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment
17013 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 404.06 Specialty Gases
17014 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 3,748.00 Lab Repairs
17015 Seagate Software 6,916.48 Software Maint.Agreement
17016 Second-Sun 117.37 Light Fixtures
17017 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 707.53 Tools
17018 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,483.13 Tools/Hardware
17019 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 15,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
17020 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 1.286.74 Lab Supplies
17021 Skater, Inc. 271.00 Pump Supplies
17022 Snap-On Incorporated 130.57 Tools
17023 So.Cal.Gas Company 16,814.23 Natural Gas
17024 South Coast Water 10.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
17025 Sparkletts 2.094.02 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
17026 State Board of Equilization 445.16 Underground Storage Tank Fee
17027 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 624.00 Janitorial Supplies
17028 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4,879.01 COP Trustee Services
17029 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
17030 Summit Steel 1,797.58 Metal
17031 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
17032 Sunset Ford 85.60 Truck Supplies
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17033 Sunset Industrial Parts 122.94 Mechanical Supplies
17034 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration
17035 Target Specialty Products 99.00 Registration
17036 Tekmar Company 185.13 Lab Supplies
17037 Tektronix, Inc. 699.87 Instrument Supplies
17038 Theme Jarrell Ash Corp. 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Maint. Service
17039 Thermo Quest 2.300.00 Lab Maint.Service
17040 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 563.88 Mechanical Supplies
17041 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 340.70 Truck Supplies
17042 TEI(systems 7,216.00 Temporary Employment Services
17043 U.S. Filter Corporation 2,525.50 Lab Water Purification System Maint.
17044 Ultra Scientific 84.87 Lab Supplies
17045 Union Dodge 18.075.06 1999 Dodge 1500 Pick-up
17046 University of Nevada, Las Vegas 750.00 Seminar Registration
17047 Valley Cities Supply Company 4.640.60 Plumbing Supplies
17048 Vortex Corp. 516.00 Door Repair
17049 VWR Scientific Products 4.294.67 Lab Supplies
17050 The Wackenhut Corporation 11.795.88 Security Guards
17051 Water Environment Federation 967.84 Publications&Ads
17052 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 215.44 Safety Supplies
17053 Western Highway Products, Inc. 305.33 Pavement Marker Supplies
17054 WEF Membership 120.00 Membership
17055 Xerox Corporation 3.611.29 Copier Leases
17056 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications
17057 991&HW-CWEA,Inc. 225.00 Registration
17058 Nicholas J.Amontes 150.00 Employee Travel Advance
17059 Dell Home Systems,Co.&S.Howard 11.463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program
17060 Michael L. Fetterman 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program
17061 Victoria L.Raymond 1.987.01 Employee Computer Loan Program
17062 John D.Stephens 1,463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program
17063 Robert J.Thistle 2,421.90 Employee Computer Loan Program
17004 Edward R.Eisenhauser 1,600.00 Professional Service-Financial
17065 J.D.Edwards Word Solutions Company 500.00 Training Expenses
17066 Aladdln House 74.48 Window Blinds
17067 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 230.87 Mechanical Supplies
17088 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services
17069 Court Order 518.90 Wage Garnishment
17070 BOC Edwards 791.96 Lab Supplies
17071 Calif Centrifugal Pump 674.52 Pump Supplies
17072 Canus Corporation 2,991.72 Fiber Optic Cable
Page 7 of T-
Claims Paid From 1/16199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17073 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
17074 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,123.38 Electrical Supplies
17075 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
17076 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Gamishment
17077 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads
17078 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
17079 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment
17080 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
17081 Geomatrix Consultants 8,336.02 Legal Services
17082 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 446.95 Truck Supplies
17083 Intergraph Corporation 6.671.88 Annual Software Maint.
17084 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment
17085 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction
17086 Airgas Direct Ind.•IPCO Safety Div. 693.11 Safety Supplies
17087 J.Spencer Freebalrn 201.12 $A Watershed Briefing
17088 Kelar Corp 15,000.00 Professional Services-Project Mgmt. Fundamentals Guide
17089 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.74 Welding Supplies
17090 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 682.60 Tools
17091 Melvin Schwartz,MO 1,750.00 Legal Services
17092 Network Construction Services 7,653.61 Construction Services-Wiring for J-42
17093 Neysa M.Call 1,049.77 SA Watershed Briefing
17094 Office Pavilllon 348.64 Office Furniture
17095 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment
17096 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
17097 Orange County Wholesale Electric 4,535.18 Electrical Supplies
17098 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 445.45 Fittings
17099 OCEA 815.61 Dues Deduction
17100 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
17101 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
17102 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction
17103 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 7.960.00 Englneering Services-Tunnels Evaluation
17104 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies
17105 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 166.11 Tools
17106 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,392.04 Tools/Hardware
17107 Slemon, Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
17108 Skalar, Inc. 51.52 Pump Supplies
17109 Snap-On Incorporated 70.33 Tools
17110 So.Cal.Gas Company 28.06 Natural Gas
17111 Southern California Edison 20,103.58 Power
17112 Sprint 56.85 Long Distance Telephone Service
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 1MO199 to 1131199
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
17113 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment
17114 Surveyors Service Company 105.57 Tools
17115 Thomas M. Dawes, P.E. 9,860.00 Professional Services MO 4.23-97
17116 Thompson Industrial Supply, In 925.08 Mechanical Supplies
17117 Tomell 8 Cotten 536.80 Legal Services
17118 Tub Ranch/Magan Fans 21,750.00 Permit Fees
17119 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
17120 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions
17121 VWR Scientific Products 356.80 Lab Supplies
17122 CASA-Biosolids EIR 25,000.00 Statewide Blosolids Land Application EIR Funding
17123 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 26,731.11 Medical Insurance Premium
17124 Orange County Sanitation District 472,264.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
17125 Mar Vac Electronics 124.90 Instrument Supplies
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2.783.184.34
Payroll Disbursements
12546-12737 Employee Paychecks $ 112,519.88 Leave Accrual,Termination 8 BOP Payoffs
12738-12878 Employee Paychecks 187.702.59 Biweekly Payroll 1127/99
12879-12890 Employee Paychecks 1,182.60 Shift Differential Adjustments
34645-35086, Direct Deposit Statements 644,151.04 Biweekly Payroll 1127199
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 945,558.11
Wire Transfer Payments
None
Total Claims Paid 1116199-1/31/9 9 $ 3,728,740.45
Page 9 of 9 �.-.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, January 27, 1999
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Peer Swan, Chair pro tem Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Ryal Wheeler
Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee
Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
Vice Chair Swan was appointed Chair pro tem.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the December 16, 1998 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were
approved as drafted.
1-
Minutes of the Steering Committee -
Page 2
January 27, 1999
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair pro tem Swan asked that a discussion of the Human Resources survey results
be placed on the February FAHR Committee agenda.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported that he received a request from the League of Cities to help
sponsor Richard Rodriguez at their February meeting. There was no objection, however a
complimentary ticket will be requested for Director Swan.
Mr. McIntyre also mentioned that staff attended the State of the County update presented by
Supervisor Smith that was sponsored by the Orange County Forum. he was supporting watershed
management as a new initiative.
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, and Mr. McIntyre attended a salinity seminar earlier in
the day, and Blake described some of the more important issues. At this time, very little has been
done about this problem. Mr. Swan said that IRWD had performed a study about ten years ago that
addressed this issue. There is a new report available on brine water management. Blake can
provide copies.
The County has filed a Notice of Preparation for an EIR on additional bridge crossings over the Santa
Ana River. Two proposed crossings would impact Plant 2 and one would affect Plant 1. The District
will comment on this EIR for the record.
Last Friday there was an incident on site that resulted in one of our Y2K consultants being accosted
and her car stolen. The police are investigating. Staff held a briefing and changes will be made to
security procedures. The General Manager will report on this in his February letter to the Board
members.
Update on Btosolids Issues:
Mr. Anderson reported that the Kern County Board of Supervisors voted to extend the existing
biosolids ordinance for another year. It will expire in January 2000. It is anticipated that a revised
ordinance will be presented to the Supervisors in the fall of 1999.
The option on purchasing the Wheeler Ridge site has been terminated as a result of the due
diligence. Three endangered animal species and one plant species were identified and the mitigation
measures would be unacceptable. Staff was directed to continue looking for opportunities in Kern
County.
Update on Matters re Santa Ana Watershed Protect Authority (SAWPA):
Mr. Anderson will report on this at the next Steering Committee meeting.
Update on Y2K Action Plan:
The update was moved to be included in agenda item B.C.
' Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
January 27, 1999
Mr. McIntyre also reported that to date cooperative projects applications have been received that total
about $5 million. The due date is Friday, January 29. At the February 2 Cooperative Projects
Guidance Committee, these applications will be considered. A report will be presented to the
Steering committee with funding recommendations and then to the Board for approval.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-G)
A. Two-year Limit for Connection Fee Credits
Two requests for waiving the two-year limit have been received. After discussion
staff was directed to send the item to the FAHR Committee for further review of
the options identified in the agenda report.
B. Michelson Pump Station Drainage Area
In an effort to negotiate with Trammel Crow, staff has initiated meetings with
IRWD to discuss the possibility of IRWD providing sewer service to this drainage
area. The members directed staff to continue discussing alternatives with IRWD
and to perform the due diligence necessary to transfer the area to IRWD. The
tolling agreement with Trammel Crow will have to be extended.
C. Y2K Emergency Purchasing Authority
The Steering Committee agreed to allow the General Manager to sign purchase
orders for Y2K-related items under the Emergency Purchasing Authority. The
General Manager will report to the Board when and if he exercises this authority.
D. Steering Committee/EMT Retreat Discussion Items
The Steering Committee members asked that further revisions be made. Michelle
Tuchman, Director of Communications, will review recommendations from the
members, review with the Chair and finalize the agenda based on comments
received from the members.
E. Consider Adjusting 1999 Board And Steering Committee Meeting Dates
The Steering Committee will recommend to the Board the following meeting date
changes:
1. July 28 to July 21 (conflict with League of CA Cities meeting)
2. November 24 to November 17 (Thanksgiving holiday)
3. December 22 to December 15 (Christmas Week)
Minutes of the Steering Committee '
Page 4
January 27, 1999
F. Consider'98-99 Performance Objectives for General Manager
The members decided to delay this discussion until February when Chair Debay
would be present.
G. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to Be Presented to Committees in February
The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees was
reviewed. Pat McGuigan, OMITS Committee Chair, indicated that there was only one
report item on the OMITS Committee agenda she would like to cancel the February
meeting. An announcement will be made at the Board meeting after discussing this
with Ed Hodges.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 5 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
ubmitted by:
'�
e n Tappan
S ering Committee Secretary
M11O EYW@� ME/ CWMTEE W-QW12MX Uri pa
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, February 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, February 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., in
the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Norm Eckenrode, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Steve Anderson John Linder, Construction Manager
John Collins, Past Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Lynn Daucher Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Jack Mauller Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
Eva Miner-Bradford Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor
Russell Patterson Gail Cain, Executive Assistant
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair
Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT:
Jan Debay, Board Chair Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair
Christina Shea
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
0CSD • P O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) %2-2411
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 2
February 4, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the December 3, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager did not make a report.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager was not present.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering introduced the Engineering Department staff to the new Committee
members. He advised they would be meeting other staff members of the Engineering Department as
staff attends the meetings to support their agenda items.
The Director of Engineering announced plans to hold a "special" meeting for the new Committee
members. This meeting will be beneficial for new members to learn the process of the Engineering
Department including design efforts, the bid process, awarding of contracts, construction
management, and change orders. He and Chair Eckenrode advised that the Committee members
would be contacted to find out their preference of days and times to have the meeting. We will know
the date by the next meeting.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly and Quarterly Change
Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five
Percent (5%).
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 3
February 4, 1999
(11) QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSAs AND ADDENDA
Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly PSAs and Addenda
Report.
(12) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY
Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly Facilities Engineering
Consultant Activity Report.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. a-f)
a. PDC99-01: Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.41, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through
Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44,
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-5, Tunnel Cover Replacement
at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP199500021, and Sludge Piping
Modifications at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 at Plant No, 1,
SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of
$80,061 and 56 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to
$8,962,766.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve this item with
the correction of the change order summary table, item 5, on page three of
the Agenda Report. The type of change order was corrected from "design
change"to "omission."
b. PDC99-02: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Replacement of Santa Ana River
Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-40, with Nationwide
Construction Company, Inc. authorizing an addition of$95,820 and 89
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $526,290.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item
c. PDC99-03: Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39-1, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving
the final closeout agreement with Olsson Construction, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 4
February 4, 1999
d. PDC99-04: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job
No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$133,279 increasing the
total contract amount to $7,763,086; and (2)Accept Ocean Outfall
Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Bell
Access, SP19950003, as complete, authorizing a Notice of Completion
and approving final closeout agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval.
e. PDC99-05: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer
System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1; and (2)Approve a budget
amendment of$4,200,000, for a total budget of$10,125,000.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
I. PDC99-06: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job
No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of
$109,860, for a total amount not to exceed $626,290.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
(14) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 5
February 4, 1999
(18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
March 4, 1999.
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Submitted by:
dG Y. �',r-"/
Gail Cain
PDC Committee Secretary
H:Rvp. Wi rgTDCWDCWFEBWhi esAm
PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Dale T. of N1.
2/4/99 2/24/99
AGENDA REPORT t e wn n rvumEe Item Num r
Purn 3 D C
Orange County Sanitation Di riot
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer
SUBJECT: THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE (TWAS) FEED TO
DIGESTERS F AND G AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NUMBER P2-39-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39-1, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final
closeout agreement with Olsson Construction, Inc.
SUMMARY
Job Number P2-39-1 included the installation of thickened waste activated sludge
(TWAS) piping and associated controls to Digesters F and G. Lee and Ro prepared the
plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Olsson Construction, Inc. on
February 4, 1998- This project has been completed.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 98,950.00
Total Contract Change Orders $ 4,098.00
Percentage Increase 4.14%
Final Adjusted Amount $103,048.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 8.4.e)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Project is exempt. Notice of exemption was filed on March 17, 1988.
c Ntq�e• w Rwwewocnaaiurtm. w Page 1
r
CEQA FINDINGS
Project is exempt. Notice of exemption was filed on March 17, 1988.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
UM:IC
o1.1A.� 2,9 Paget
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F & G
JOB NO. P2-39-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ;UT
POSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIONOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED'
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST RIZATION TODATE TO�DATE(%)
Project Development $
Design Staff $ $
Consultant PSA $ $
LConstrudontract $ 110,550 $ 110.550 $ 110,550 $ 103,048 $ 103,048 $ 98,950 96%
er) $ $
$ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80.450 $ 48,584 60%
$ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ -$ 200,000 $ 200.000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 183,498 $ - $ 183,498 $ 147,534 80%
hWp.dtalen9lror ftW get taM
Fmm RwsW 1V17198
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F AND G
Job No. 132-39-1
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 2/4198 $ 98,950.00 $ 98,950.00 230 230
CO NO. 1 11/9/98' $ 4,098.00 $ 103,048.00 4.14% 0 230
'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
H:...P2-39-1lCloseout Status Report
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dap! TOM.of Dir.
2141 9 2/14o
Num
ber
19
AGENDA REPORT Item ItemN
r4 0
Orange County Sanitation DI VC,
FROM: David Ludw, hector of Engineering
Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer
SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, JOB
NO. J-34-1; PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-35-5; AND CONVEYOR BELT
ACCESS, SP19950003
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job
No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$133,279 increasing the total
contract amount to $7,763,086; and (2) Accept Ocean Ouffall Reliability
Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, as complete,
authorizing a Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with
Advanco Constructors, Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 8 includes twelve items of added work and two items of
deleted work to Job No. J-34-1 and two items of added work to Job No. P2-35-5.
There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated
damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
This project has been completed.
The budget reallocation is needed to transfer funds from the Construction
Contract to the Construction Staff within the project budget. Authorization is
needed for expenditures of the proposed revised budget. The budget
reallocation does not increase the total project budget. Change Order No. 7
contained an item, which involved modifications to Surge Tower No. 1. The
District was reimbursed for all of the associated costs. Item No. 14 of Change
Order No. 8, contains extra costs for site grading at Plant No. 2. This work was
not part of the original contract. The work was performed in this contract to
expedite the construction of storm water retention basins at the north end of
Plant No. 2.
Gwglobel'Agenda Dree RepotleWDCW-WAIT-008.dot
Revised 01I11W
S
•
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 7,122,693.00
Previous Authorized Changes 507,114.00
This Change Order (Add)(DedUGt-) 133,279.00
Change Orders to Date 640,393.00
Percent Increase 8.99%
Amended Contract Price $7,763,086.00
The Change Order percentage on this contract was greatly affected by two items
of extra work. One item involved $299,900, for which the District was reimbursed
the entire amount. The second item was work not associated with this contract in
the amount of$98,927. Without including these changes, the Change Order
percentage of this contract was 3.40%.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORF C.5.a and B.6.a)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
See attached Budget Information Table
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, consists of improving the
reliability of the standby Ocean Ouffall Pipeline by constructing a new Surge
Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. Job No. P2-35-5,
Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements, consists of miscellaneous site and
landscape improvements at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for Job
No. J-34-1 were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the plans and specifications
for Job No. P2-35-5 was prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The
construction contract for these jobs was awarded to Advanco Constructors, Inc.
in November 1996. This contract is complete.
GlAglobalWgenda Draft ReponslPDCU-341AR-008.do1
Revised:01/11199
V
The following summarizes the Change Order:
ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
NO.
1 Lower Platform Revisions at Valve $ 1,512 0 Changed
Boxes 3 and 4 Condition
2 Additional Work to Plant Palm Trees 325 0 Design Change
3 6dra Work to Sandblast Exledor of 1,380 0 Changed
Surge Tower No. 2 Condition
4 Additional Footage of Electrical Dud 7,856 0 Changed
Banks Conditions
5 Additional Guard Post 553 0 Design Change
6 Vent Pipe Support at Surge Tower 7,895 0 Design Change
No. 2
7 Reroute Branch Circuits from MCC- 1,651 0 Changed
RASE4 Lighting Panel to RASE-1 Conditions
Liahtina Panel
8 Additional Handrail at Top of Surge 889 0 Design Change
Tower No. 2
9 Pressure Grout 120-inch Pipe Joint 2.892 0 Design Change
at Surge Tower No. 1
10 Delete Paint Work Inside Surge (3,900) 0 Design Change
Tower No.2
11 Install Class B in Lieu of Class D (2,535) 0 Design Change
Flanges
12 120-Inch Pipe Test 475 0 Design Change
13 Control Wires for Surge Tower 1,200 0 Design Change
Bubbler Panels
14 Site Grading at Plant No.2 98,927 0 Work Not
Related to
Contract
15 Additional Paving and Landscaping 10,460 0 Design Change
Work
16 Pothole for 12-inch Pipe at Vile 5 3.709 0 Changed
Condition
TOTAL-Change Orde No.B 14 133,279 0
These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract I
discovered in the design phase. A budget revision is needed to reallocate funds
within the total project budget. The revision provides for authorization to increase
the proper budget line item for Construction Staff by transferring funds from the
Construction Contract. This is a project with a budget established several years
ago and as such, District Construction Staff costs were underestimated and not
fully burdened with overhead costs.
ALTERNATIVES
None
GMIglobaaAgenda Draft Reports'PDCV-347AIT-008401
Revised:01tIIW
c
CEQA FINDINGS
Final EIR approved on July 1989 and Notice of Determination filed on
February 9. 1995.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Change Order Status Report
Change Order
UM:lc
GrnlglobarAgenda Draft ReporlsNDCV341A1T-COSAW
Revised:01111IN
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS
JOB NOS. J-34-1 & P2-35-5
9P—
ProjectDRO PROPC 'FU1ID8 ✓' THIS 'w tPR01�
K' OR¢F,Dq� ORIZE� E
TO DATE� +V4 '
Development $ - �. $
I
Desi n Staff $ $ -
ConsuBant PW $ 725,000 $ 725,000 $ 725,000 ° $ 725,000 $ 725,000 $ 696.7601 96%
Construction Contract $ 7,478,883 $ 8,880,862 $ 1 117 776 $ 7,763,086 ' $ 7,629,807 $ 133,279 $ 7,763,085 $ 7 520 055 97%
a
Construction Other $ $
Staff $ 177,117 $ 408,776 $ 842984 E 1 251 7 408.776 $ 842,964 $ 1,251 740 $ 1,120,229 89%
Contnaency E 274812 $ 274812 " $
TOTAL $ 8,381,000 $ 10.014,638 $ $ 10,014,638 $ 8,763,583 $ 976,243 1 $ 9,739,826 $ 9.337,044 96%
h.W, t Wn9V�nd cwtma UJe-1CMu49et teWe
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Job Nos. J-34.1, P2-35-5, and SP19950003
APPROVAL CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS( (DAYS)
CONTRACT 1/9/97 $ 7,122,693.00 $ 7,122,693.00 0.00% 730 730
CO NO. 1 6/25/97 $ (4,170.00) $ 7,118,523.00 -0.06% 0 730
CO NO. 2 1 8/27197 $ 50.415.00 $ 7,168,938.00 0.65% 0 730
CO NO. 3L99,900.00
24,570.00 $ 7,193,508.00 0.99% 0 730
CO NO.4 20,168.00 $ 7,213,676.00 1.28% 0 730
CO NO. 5 71,557.00 $ 7,285,233.00 2.28% 0 730
CO NO. 6• 44,674.Oo $ 7,329,907.00 2.91% 0 730
CO NO. 7 $ 299,900.00 $ 7,629,807.00 7.12% 0 730
,.`A �u..
'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8
WwpAtMenglobs eoMmc \J344\C08changwMerstatus
Page 1 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9 272 8-81 2 7
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors, Inc. C.O. No. Elaht(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Uoarade Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access.Job No. SP19950003
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Dedust) $133,279.00
In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work
Is hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. J-34-1
ITEM 1 — LOWER PLATFORMS REVISIONS AT VALVE BOXES NO. 3 AND 4
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to relocate a beam at Valve Box No. 3 and to
lower a platform at Valve Box No. 4. The installed C12X12.10 member and clip angles were removed
and reinstalled adjacent to the wall at Valve Box No. 3. The platform at Valve Box No. 4 was lowered
to clear the concrete encased 6-inch PVC pipe on the Surge Tower wall. The exact size of the
actuators and the location of the PVC pipe were not known during the design phase and were
unforeseen conditions. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a)
of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 22 and Advanco's letter dated March 17, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,512.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL WORK TO PLANT PALM TREE
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to plant one palm tree near Surge Tower
No. 1. The work included additional excavation and trimming the tree roots to plant the tree per the
contract drawings. This additional work was required due to an existing 78-Inch line that interfered with
the placement of the palm tree. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 29 and Advanco's
letter dated March 31, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $325.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT '
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors Inc C.O. No. Eiaht(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Uoorada Job No J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access.Job No,SP19950003
ITEM 3— EXTRA WORK TO SANDBLAST EXTERIOR OF SURGE TOWER NO. 2
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to sandblast the exterior of Surge Tower
No. 2. A hole was created during the sandblasting operations of Surge Tower No. 2's steel shell. The
hole caused a minor leak and the surface effected by the leak had to be re-sandblasted. Also included
is the costs for repairing the hole. The condition of the steel shell was not known during the design
phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General
Provisions (Reference Advanco's letter dated May 5, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,380.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4—ADDITIONAL FOOTAGE OF ELECTRICAL DUCT BANKS
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for constructing an additional length of
electrical duct banks. The duct banks had to be realigned because there was not enough space for the
duct bank penetration into the basement of Power Distribution Center"D" at the location shown on the
drawings. The realignment resulted in an increased length of the duct bank. This work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions
(Reference Field Change Order No. 32 and Advanco's Letter Dated November 17, 1997).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,856.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5—ADDITIONAL GUARD POST
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install a guard post in front of the bubbler
panel at Surge Tower No. 2. The guard post will prevent the bubbler panel from being hit by moving
vehicles. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)
of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 28 and Advanco's letter dated March 30,
1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $553.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Dale: Februarv24. 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No.J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements.Job No.P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003
ITEM 6—VENT PIPE SUPPORT AT SURGE TOWER NO. 2
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install a pipe support to the 14-inch vent
pipe at Surge Tower No. 2. The contract drawings required that the existing support be removed
during construction and reinstalled after the construction was complete. During construction it was
discovered that the vent support would interfere with the new access ladders at Valve Boxes 3 and 4
and would not provide adequate headroom for stairway traffic. Therefore the existing vent was raised
four feet and a new support system consisting of two columns and a beam was installed to eliminate
this problem. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 27 and Advanco' s letter dated March 16, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,895.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 7—REROUTE BRANCH CIRCUITS FROM MCC-RASE-4 LIGHTING PANEL TO RASE-1
LIGHTING PANEL
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to reroute branch circuits from MCC RASE-4
lighting panel to RASE-1 lighting panel. This rerouting was necessary because no circuits were
available in the existing lighting panel (MCC-RASE-4). Circuits were available at MCC-RASE-4 during
the design phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 24 and Advanco' s letter dated March 30,
1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,651.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8—ADDITIONAL HANDRAIL AT TOP OF SURGE TOWER NO. 2
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install handrail on the top of Surge Tower
No. 2. The additional four feet of handrail is a safety requirement and provides closure to the handrail
installation on the top of Surge Tower No. 2. The contract documents did not reflect this portion of the
work. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of
the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 31 and Advanco' s letter dated May 6,
1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $889.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advance Constructors. Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements,Job No P2-35-5 Conveyor Belt Access.Job No.SP19950003
ITEM 9—PRESSURE GROUT 120-INCH PIPE JOINT AT SURGE TOWER NO. 1
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to inject grout into the space between the
weld ring and the bell ring of the 120-inch pipe at Surge Tower No. 1. Pressure grout had to be used
because concrete would not penetrate into the 2-inch space between the weld ring and the bell rings of
the 120-inch pipe. This work was not included in the contract documents. This work was negotiated
with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Advance's
letter dated September 22, 1997).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.882.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 10—DELETE PAINT WORK FOR SURGE TOWER NO. 2 INTERIOR
This is a credit item for deleting painting work inside Surge Tower No. 2. Preliminary survey identified
areas of corrosion at the lower interior of the steel shell. The design engineer, Carollo Engineers
recommended that additional corrosion testing and survey of the steel shell was required before the
inside surface could be painted. This work will be performed on a different project. This credit amount
was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions
(Reference Field Change No. 34 and Advanco's letter dated July 17, 1998).
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,900.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 —CREDIT FOR INSTALLING CLASS"B" INSTEAD OF CLASS "D" FLANGES
This is a credit item for installing Class B flanges in lieu of Class D flanges. Class D flanges are thicker
than Class 8 flanges. The contract documents required that the Contractor install Class D flanges for
all pipe. Since Class B flanges were adequate for this job, the District approved the use of Class B
flanges. This credit amount was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions (Reference Advance's letter dated February 18, 1998).
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($2,535.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrade.Job No J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and SecurRy
Imorovements.Job No.P2-35-5 Conveyor Bell Access.Job No.SPI9950003
ITEM 12 — 120-INCH PIPE TEST
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to pressure test the 120-inch pipe at Valve
Box No. 1. This test was necessary to ensure that the 120-inch valve at Valve Box No. 1 would not
leak during the hydrotesting of Surge Tower No. land was not included in the contract. Leakage past
the valves could result in violation of the District's discharge permit. This work was accomplished by
Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field
Change Order No. 33 and Advanco's letter dated May 12, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $475.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 13—CONTROL WIRES FOR SURGE TOWER BUBBLER PANELS
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to connect the control wires from the bubbler
panels at Surge Towers 1 and 2 to data concentrators. The control wires from Valves No. 1 to 6 were
terminated using terminal strips. Control wire from the bubbler panel at Surge Tower No. 2 was
connected to the control wire at the existing junction box. Control wire from the bubbler panel at Surge
Tower No. 1 was connected to Data Concentrator No. 2. The details of these connections were not
shown on the contract drawings because information regarding the data concentrators was not
available during the design phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference RFI No. 74 and Field Change Order No. 27)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,200.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 14—SITE GRADING AT PLANT 2
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to grade the north area of Plant No. 2.
During last winters El Nino Storms, Plant No. 2 experienced periods when stormwater runoff from the
plant site flowed to Brookhurst Street. Although only stormwater carrying sediment and no sewage
was discharged, it created a public relations problem. Additionally, a stormwater management plan is
required by our new NPDES Permit that will establish best management practices for the District to
retain and treat stormwater runoff on-site. To accomplish this, grading was done at the north and of
the plant site and two stormwater retention basins were be constructed to prevent stormwater runoff
form leaving the site. The basins allow Operations to more effectively manage the peak flows needing
treatment that are associated with in-plant storm runoff.
Page 6 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24. 1999
Job: Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrade,Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Secur'M
Improvements,Job No. P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003
ITEM 14 - (Continued)
As directed by the PDC committee in November 1998, the work was constructed as a change order to
this contract in an effort to complete the work before the anticipated rains. A project was designed and
bids were solicited from contractors that are currently working for the District. Advanco Constructors
provided the low bid of$86,968. During the excavation the District directed the contractor to increase
the size of the southerly basin which resulted in an additional cost of$11,959. This work was
negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference
Plan Change No. 31)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $98.927.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
P2-35.5
ITEM 15 -ADDITIONAL PAVING AND LANDSCAPING WORK
This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to:
1. Repair asphalt paving not covered by the contract documents.
2. Install additional sprinklers and other miscellaneous landscaping work not required by the contract
documents.
Item No. 1 was performed per Operations' request and to cover potholes around the newly paved
areas. Item No. 2 was performed per General Services' request and to ensure proper irrigation in
landscaped areas. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-
6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 30 and Advanco's letter dated
May 12. 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,460.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 7 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors.Inc C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003
ITEM 16—POTHOLE FOR 12-INCH PIPE AT SITE 5
Plan Change No. 10 included deletion of paving at Site 5 to allow construction of future facilities in the
area. A catch basin was also constructed to allow for proper drainage at the south end of Site 5. This
item is for additional costs to pothole, locate, and connect the 12-inch storm drainpipe to the nearest
catch basin. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-
6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 10 and Advanco's letter dated
February 6, 1998).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,709.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $133,279.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 8 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors.Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No J-34-1 Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements Job No P2-35-5 Conveyor Belt Access Job Na SP19950003
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. 11 is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time
is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: January 9, 1997
Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: January 8, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $_7,122,693.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 507,114.00
This Change (Add)(DedusE) $ 133,279.00
Amended Contract Price $7,763,086.00
Page 9 of 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors, Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8)
Date: February 24, 1999
Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No.J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and Security
Improvements,Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003
Board Authorization Date: February 24, 1999
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Sub ed by:
� . � -2a-99
Corlstruction Manager Date
Ap ove by:
Director of En inee'ng Date
Accepted by:
Advanco Constructors
4o,
Contra o Date
R: p.da%engWB58 CONTRACTSV-W%CO8d
PDC COMMITTEE M ngD0 To N.ofu,
2+98 2-2a99
AGENDA REPORT He N�os � ?e.°'
Orange County Sanitation Distri
FROM: David Lu i , Director of Engineering
Originator: Bud Palmquist, Project Manager
SUBJECT: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1,
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$4,200,000, for
a total budget of$10,125.000.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-38-1 were completed in January 1999.
The designer for this project is Boyle Engineering Corporation. The current engineer's
estimate is $8,489,633 and the original construction budget was $4,308,000.
A budget increase for Contract No. 3-38-1 is required because the current budget was
prepared using an older construction cost estimate not representative of the new final
design. After taking into consideration many of the constructability, maintainability,
traffic control and operability issues which only became known during final design, the
consulting engineer produced a final construction cost estimate much higher than the
original construction budget. This project had been on hold during the 1994 bankruptcy
and the original budget was not updated until after the final design was complete.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The original construction budget for Contract
No. 3-38-1 was $4.3 million. The requested construction budget for Contract No. 3-38-1
is now$8.5 million. The current engineer's estimate for construction is $8,489,633.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1998-99 Budget
Collection System Improvement,Zone 3, Line F)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Staff requests an increase in the construction budget of$4.2 million for Contract
No. 3-38-1. These funds will come from Revenue Zone No. 3 reserves.
O:N,6lobaMpenda Draft Rap ftVDCl3 IPR 224WdN
R—W a o„ Pagel
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System was constructed in the 1960s and incorporated r
sewers of the Le Habra Purchase in Beach Boulevard. In the 1970s, the Beach Relief
and Imperial Relief Trunk Sewers were constructed parallel to the Miller-Holder Trunk
System with diversion structures to allow the two parallel trunk sewers to operate in
conjunction with each other.
The OCSD 1989 Master Plan identified the Miller-Holder and Beach Relief Trunk Sewer
System as being in need of parallel or replacement sewers because the existing sewers
were hydraulically deficient.
The alignment for the project begins at the intersection of Artesia Boulevard and
Rostrata Avenue and ends at a point in Beach Boulevard just north of Hillsborough.
The new 39-inch trunk sewer replaces the parallel sewers and is designed to
accommodate all the existing and future flows in the sewer system. One other existing
parallel trunk line will remain in standby operation as a backup system with the ability to
divert flows from one trunk sewer to the other.
A budget increase for Contract No. 3-38-1 is required and is attributed to the following
elements:
• The original budget estimate was prepared during the initial stages of design and
was not updated until the design was complete.
• The unit cost increases for pipeline material was not factored into the cost estimate
until recently.
da The trunk sewer was upsized to 39-inch for total length of the project. The original
budget was based on the trunk sewer sized between 30-inch to 33-inch in diameter
for approximately 70 percent of the total project.
• The original budget estimate did not include costs for jacked steel casing work,
diversion structure modifications, by-pass pumping and flow diversion, and
abandonment and removal costs.
Although the costs have increased significantly, Staff has determined that this sewer
project is greatly needed because of the rapid increase in development tributary to this
sewer system. For the last two years, the District has experienced at least one sewer
overflow during peak rainfall events resulting from capacity deficiencies.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives.
61n,globeMgenda Draft ROPQMPDC3 I AR U4W dot
R—. eawse Page 2
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final
EIR was approved on July 19, 1998 and the Notice of Determination was filed on
July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
BP:jam
G:WglobaKAgenda Draft RepoftXPDC�3&1 AR 22499.dot
GMpWMM Wap ft Rey,4kWC Ml AR nMdot
Renwd. � Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED, ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE- EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE- TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ (19,000) $ 1,000 $ 20,000 $ (19,000) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 100%
Design Staff $ 153.000 $ 153.000 $ 19,000 $ 172,000 $ 153,000 $ 19,000 $ 172,000 $ 151,516 88%
Consultant PSA Is 300,000 $ 300,000 1 $ - $ 300.000 1 $ 171.500 1 $ 171,500 1 $ 162,922 95%
Construction Contract $ 4.308.000 $ 4,308,000 $ 4.200.000 $ 8,50B4O00 $
Construction(Other) $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ $ 30,000 $ 23,000 77%
Construction Staff $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 200.000 $ $ 200,000 $ 26,447 13%
Contingency $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ $ 914,000
TOTAL $ 5.925.000 1 $ 5,925,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 10.125.000 $ 344,500 $ - $ 1,48B,500 $ 364,885 25%
rr.wodWe�Usaa-ae-M-38-1 nu4g�anie
PDC COMMITTEE Meebng Date TOBT Or Dir.
2-499 2-2499
AGENDA REPORT DC Numb I NF
Orange County Sanitation Di [t /4
FROM: David Ludwin, rector of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer
SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALL,
JOB NO. J-39, ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo
Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing
for additional engineering services in the amount of$109,860, for a total amount
not to exceed $626,290.
SUMMARY
Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch
Outfall, Job No. J-39, recommended that a ballast survey program be
implemented to monitor the condition of the ballast. The ballast is the protective
blanket of rock that absorbs the force of large storm waves. The ballast
protecting the 120-inch outfall was placed during construction in the early 1970s.
It was recommended that the ballast be monitored every five years and, as
needed, following events impacting the ballast, such as severe storms or
earthquakes.
Racal Pelagos, Inc., inspected and measured the ballast rock in 1996. Several
large storms occurred during the El Nino winter of 1997-98. In December 1998,
Racal Pelagos repeated the survey. The surveys indicated that some of the
ballast appears to have moved from its original position.
Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch
Outfall, Job No. J-39, also recommended proceeding with physical wave tank
modeling tests. Proposed Addendum No. 4 is to perform these modeling tests to
determine the extent of additional ballast that will be required and the optimal
rock size to provide continued long-term use of the 120-inch outfall at the lowest
cost.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with
the original PSA, subsequent addenda, and this pending Addendum No. 4.
GWalobaM9enaa oun RepftWL1 W39 Aooa M4"d=
Revised 16M Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: cORF—Dta.)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
In March 1996, Carollo Engineers entered into an agreement with the District to
provide engineering services needed for the investigation and repair work for
continued use and reliable performance of the District's 78-inch and 120-inch
ocean outfalls, Job. No. J-39.
The Scope of Work for the outfall investigation and repair work included:
1. A study and report that analyzes securing the end gate. The study includes
preparation of plans and specifications to secure the end gate.
2. Documentation of the amount of solids/grit accumulation in the outfall diffuser
and determination of the condition of the outfalls.
3. Preparation of detailed plans and specifications for cleaning of the outfall
based on interior inspection.
4. A hydraulic analysis for both outfalls to determine flow capacity.
5. General survey and repair work needed on both outfalls.
Outfall surveys were conducted by Racal Pelagos, Inc. in 1996 and in 1998
(following the 1997-98 El Nino storms) as part of the J-39 studies to determine
the condition of the ballast. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast
appears to have moved from its original position. Natural shifting of the ballast
pile due to large storm waves during the 1980s and 1990s may have caused this
movement. Although some movement was observed, the ballast system did not
appear to be in danger of immediate failure.
Recent Work Efforts
In February 1998, Carollo Engineers submitted a report on the structural
condition of the 120-inch outfall and the repair of the 78-inch outfall (Job.
No. J-39). Carollo Engineers analyzed the condition of the 120-inch ouffall and
provided recommendations for additional testing and repairs. The following
c.11.a ..d.D,an .1.121.aec
a.,,..a 11.5 Page 2
recommendations were offered by Carollo Engineers (recommendations in bold
were earmarked to be completed this fiscal year and were included in the
1998-99 CORF Budget):
1. Replace the temporary closure system at the 120-inch outfall end gate
with a permanent device of suitable metal within 12 months.
(Completed Sept '98 at a total cost of$101,147).
2. Replace the thrust restraint tie located at the 120-inch outfall end gate
structure's offshore side. (Completed Sept '98. Cost included with
Item 1 above).
3. Implement a ballast survey program to periodically monitor the
condition of the ballast. Monitoring should be performed every five
years and as needed following events impacting the ballast such as
severe storms or earthquakes. (Completed Dec '98 at a total cost of
$32,120).
4. Perform physical wave tank modeling tests to determine optimal size
gradation and extent for additional ballast to reinforce the existing
120-inch ouffall ballast system. (Proposed March '99 at a total cost of
$109,860).
5. Perform additional corrosion verification and testing on manhole covers within
10 years. Replace covers as needed in the future prior to the exceedance of
the 1-inch corrosion allowance.
6. Re-rock the sections of the 120-inch outfall where additional reinforcing
ballast is required.
7. Repair scour pad at the 120-inch outfall end gate structure.
8. Perform hydraulic testing of the 78-inch outfall.
Additional Work Effort Recommended— Addendum No. 4
Preliminary results from the analysis conducted in the February 1998 engineering
report indicate that almost one mile of the 120-inch outfall would benefit from
additional reinforcing ballast. Initial cost estimates to reinforce the outfall from
Station 27+00 to 70+00 (the stretch of outfall that experiences the most intensive
wave forces) approach $13,000,000. The analysis is considered a theoretical
starting point that needs to be verified by physical laboratory testing. Staff
recommends proceeding with Recommendation 4, as described above, so the
work can be completed by June 30, 1999, The wave tank model will determine
the optimal size and extent of additional rock that may be necessary to reinforce
the existing ballast system (Recommendation 6).
c DMI RePoRWWL -M.39 RDN 22493 dx
R—x 1. Page 3
I
Carollo Engineers and their subconsultant, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech, have
worked with Oregon State University (OSU) to establish a program and schedule
for wave tank testing at their Corvallis, Oregon location lest facility.
Carollo proposes to provide the services of Dr. Fred Raichlen for the planning,
coordination, observations, and results evaluation of the wave tank ballast testing
at OSU. Carollo will provide the services of Dr. Charles Sollitt his staff, and the
use of the testing facilities at OSU.
Based on the results of the wave tank testing, Carollo will survey existing local
rock quarries to factor in an optimum gradation solution. Carollo will also review
the results of the 1998 ballast cross section inspection, prior to submitting the
final report, which will indicate the most effective and economical protection for
the outfall.
Basis of Recommendation
1. The new Strategic Plan places special emphasis on making use of the
existing 120-inch outfall. All disposal alternatives developed in the
District's 1998 Draft Strategic Plan rely on the 120-inch outfall as the
primary means to discharge wastewater flows through 2020,
2. Many other neighboring ocean outfalls have experienced movement of the
protective rock as a result of wave activity over the past several decades.
Mitigation efforts are shown in the table below.
AGENCY t OUTFALL" `DESCRIPTION
Encina WPCA Re-rocked mid-depth area 1992
Carlsbad
City of Oceanside Re-rocked, 8,000 ft, mid-depth 1993
San Elijo Joint Powers Re-rocked (three projects) 1992
LA County Sanitation Rocked deep water section 1997
Districts
3. The analysis provided in the February 1998 engineering report suggests
that almost one mile of the outfall needs to be reinforced with larger sized
rocks. Actual physical tests will refine the appropriate size of the work
required and identify the reach of outfall that needs the support. The final
refined estimate may be reduced approximately 10-30% ($1,000,000 -
$4,000,000), should the actual physical test results indicate the need of
placing smaller sized rock and/or less rock around the outfall.
D WplobefNgenda Draft RepoaWDL 39V36 ADw 224Hdk[
R—. Iaree Page 4
ALTERNATIVES
• Option 1 — No further action
This alternative involves halting any further studies regarding the protective
ballast armor, disregarding the analysis conducted in the engineering report that
indicates the need for additional ballast, and relying on the original design and
current condition of the 120-inch outfall to continue to protect the ouffall from
wave forces well into the future. Although this option is the least expensive, it is
also the most risky approach.
Option 2— Use existing analysis to re-rock the 120-inch ouffall
This alternative involves halting any further studies (ie., wave tank modeling),
and adopting the recommendation to re-rock the section of the 120-inch ouffall
identified in the engineering report. This approach is more responsive than
alternative 1, and would provide additional protection to the 120-inch outfall.
However, it is not deemed to be the most cost-effective approach.
• Option 3— Proceed with Wave Tank Modeling to further investigate the need
to re-rock the 120-inch ouffall (recommended)
This alternative involves conducting physical wave tank modeling to better define
the need for additional rock. The testing will examine the unique design of
protecting the outfall by placing additional ballast over the existing armament
system, and will determine the most effective and economical protection for the
outfall by limiting projected wave damage in the future.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable
ATTACHMENTS
1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
2. Budget Information Table
3. Proposal letter from Carollo Engineers dated November 19, 1998
CJH:jam
G:\ntglob Mgenda Dmft RepohaWDCu-39U-39 ADD422499.dw
c ws�s+�W maa Dort aawusocuavi.>s noon Hass e:
Ravee. „sa, Page 5
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Investigation & Repair - Ocean Outfalls
JOB NO. J-39
ORIGINAL e. CURRENT -PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS •- THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
-PROJECTrrASK 'AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED - AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL.: EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
-. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE - BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Design Staff $ 210,000 $ 345,000 $ 345.000 $ 346.000 $ 345.000 $ 162,000 47%
Consultant PSA $ 968,000 $ 740,653 $ 740,653 $ 516,430 $ 109.860 $ 626,290 $ 565,000 90%
Construction Contract
(Dive
Services/Repairs) $ - $ 288,947 $ 288.947 $ 163,915 $ 163,915 $ 132,000 81%
Construction Staff $ 47.500 $ 65.000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 0%
TOTAL $ 1,225,500 $ 1,439.600 $ 1,439,600 It 1.090,345 $ 109,860 $ 1,200,205 $ 859.000 72%
H WmAlaWr4y mMumWe -390-39b d-Ibi 22499
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. J-39
Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls
Total Project Budget: $1,439,600
Consultant: Carollo Engineers, inc.
Start Date of Project: March 1996
Data Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs
327/96 Original Investigation and minor repair to ocean outfalls $433,250 $433,260
PSA
10122/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-Inch outfall $38,310 $471,570
4/06/98 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgate repair $23,090 $494,660
8/01/98 3 Provide assistance during bid 8 construction of endgate repair $21,770 $516,430
Pending 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling) needed to refine $109,860 $626,290
recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-
Inch ocean outfall
H9 r.tlla%angUOBS a CONTRACTSU-39U-39 PSA status report 22499 Eoc
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, February 10, 1999, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on February 10, 1999 at 5:30 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Ryal Wheeler, Foreman
Mark Leyes, Vice Chair
Shawn Boyd STAFF PRESENT:
John M. Gullixson
Shirley McCracken Don McIntyre, General Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Mike Pelennan, Director of Human Resources
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Directors Absent: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Jan Debay, Board Chair Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager
Mark A. Murphy Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Todd Spitzer Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager
Mike White, Controller
Larry Kraemer, O&M Engineer
Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager
Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
OC SO • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 2
February 10, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with Directors Boyd and McCracken abstaining, to
approve the minutes of the December 9, 1998 Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Chairman Saltarelli welcomed new Directors Shirley McCracken and Shawn Boyd to the
Committee. The Chair then recognized Director Mark Leyes as the Committee's new Vice Chair.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported to the Committee the need to add two items requiring
immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda: A) Compensate the
Kern County, Wheeler Ridge property owner for a second month's payment of$10,400, and; B)
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance
technical assistance to complete embedded systems assessment, reparation, and testing not to
exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999. Mr. McIntyre reported that the emergency items
could be added to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two-
thirds' vote of the Committee.
It was moved, seconded, and unanimously carried to add two items to the Agenda pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2)
Mr. McIntyre advised that two reports were placed before the Committee just prior to the meeting
pertaining to the respective emergency items.
The Chair advised that these two items would be added to the agenda right after the Consent
Calendar.
(7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson had no report.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Mr. Streed advised that several reports were placed before the Directors just prior to the
meeting.
• A report by Carollo Engineers dealing with connection and user fees. The report was not
mailed with the agenda package because many Directors received a copy during the user fee
discussions last year, however, Mr. Streed felt the report might be useful to the Committee
during the connection fee discussion this evening. Mr. Streed noted that the connection fee
comparative numbers are located on Page A18 of the Carollo report.
• The Treasurers Report for January was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in
accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. For the benefit
of the new Directors, Mr. Streed explained that data for this report is not available at the time
of the agenda mailings each month and, therefore, the report is handed out at the meeting in
order to meet the end of month 30-day requirement. Since there was no FAHR Committee
meeting last month, the Treasurer's Report went directly to the Board.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
February 10, 1999
• Three pages dealing with connection fee comparative data were also placed before the
Committee just prior to the meeting.
Mr. Streed further reported that an item on tonight's Consent Calendar deals with General
Manager's purchases over$50,000, and is the second time the Committee has considered this
item. Staff is in the process of rewriting the Purchasing Authority and Resolution that may
eliminate the Committee's requirement of a report every quarter on these purchases.
(9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources Mike Pelernan advised that there would be a short closed
session on the Supervisor and Professional Management Team labor negotiations and arbitration
tonight.
Mr. Peterrnan reported to the Committee the results of the Human Resources Survey. He
advised that normally the results are only reported in an article in The Pipeline, the District's
newsletter, however, since this year's results were particularly negative in the areas of
confidentiality, productivity and communications, he felt a report would be appropriate.
Mr. Peternan explained the survey process, the survey results, obvious reasons for this year's
low ratings, and he offered suggestions on how to improve ratings in the future.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
• The Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman reported that Dave Parrish, a reporter
from The Reaister, has contacted the District requesting information on the status of Mr. Ray
Littrell's efforts concerning the District's user fees. Mr. Parrish is aware that Mr. Littrell has
been to the Grand Jury and that the Grand Jury has visited the District. Staff is providing
Mr. Parrish with a copy of a letter the Grand Jury sent to the District which states we are
doing a good job; a copy of a letter General Manager Don McIntyre sent to Sheldon Singer,
who is the Grand Jury Foreman; and a copy of a Request for Proposals that the Finance
Department sent out requesting proposals for a company or individual to look at government-
owned parcels relating to sewer service rates. The responses to the RFP are due in next
Thursday.
Michelle reviewed Mr. Littrell's general complaint for the Committee and Mr. Littrell's contacts
with the District, news media and Grand Jury.
• Staff has just completed work on redesigning and updating the District's wastewater brochure
which is being used in our information packets.
• The cities of Westminster, Costa Mesa, Seal Beach, and Midway City will all be airing the
District's new video on Cable TV.
(11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported to the Committee good news pertaining to an accident
that occurred at the District in 1994 involving employees of a contractor, Pascal and Ludwig, who
were installing a gate in our channel. Mr. Woodruff described the accident and the injuries to the
Pascal and Ludwig employees. He advised that four citations were issued to the District by
CAL-OSHA as a result of their investigation. Mr. Woodruff described the District's alleged
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting r
Page 4
February 10, 1999
violations concerning this incident, which the District appealed. Mr. Woodruff advised that his
office has just received a decision from the appeals judge dismissing all four citations. He stated
that the court's decision will set an excellent precedent, because it relieves the District from
being responsible for contractors' employees. Mr. Woodruff further advised that CAL-OSHA's
regulations are expected to be rewritten.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
Operations and Maintenance Director Bob Ooten reported that one of the District's large
anaerobic digesters, holding two million gallons of liquid, is leaking around a pipe. He explained
that the packing gave way causing the liquid to run out onto the ground, into a drain, and into our
headworks. Staff is diluting the liquid, and the tank Is being drained. Mr. Dolan advised that it
would take twenty-four hours to drain the tank. Once the tank is drained, a contractor will be
brought in for repairs. Mr. Oolen explained that incidents such as these occur once every couple
of years, reassuring the Committee that it is safe and under control.
(12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- E)
A. FAHR99-01: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
January 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee
meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in
conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports
reviewed within 30 days of month end.
B. FAHR98-02: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report,
C. FAHR98-03: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of January 20, 1999.
D. FAHR98-04: Receive and file report of General Manager-approved purchases in
amounts exceeding $50,000.
E. FAHR96-05: Receive and file Ouarterty Investment Management Program Report for
the period October 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998.
F. FAHR98-06: Renew boiler& machinery insurance for the District for the period
March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000, with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company,
in an amount not to exceed $71,286.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. There were none.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 12(A) through 12(F) under Consent Calendar.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 5
February 10, 1999
It 2.1) EMERGENCY ACTION ITEMS (Items A- B)
A. Compensate the Kern County, Wheeler Ridge Property Owner for a
Second Month's Payment Of$10,400.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried, with one opposition, to approve staffs
recommendation to pay a second month additional payment of$10,400.
B. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year
2000 Compliance Technical Assistance to Complete Embedded Systems Assessment,
Reparation, and Testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
(13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- E)
A. FAHR99-07: Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the
independent audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional
three-year period, and to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192
for an amount not to exceed $42,600 for the first year with provision for 4% annual
escalations for years two and three.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation with the following changes: Propose to extend
the contract for an additional one-year period (1998-99), and to
issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an
amount not to exceed $42,600. Proposals for five-year audit
services will be solicited during 1999-2000.
The Committee directed staff to bring this item back to Committee next month if
Moreland & Associates rejects the District's proposal.
B. FAHR99-08: Authorize staff to give Danny Evangelista an 11.7% equity
adjustment to correct the internal and external inequities that exist between
Mr. Evangelista's salary and the salaries of other Programmers.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
C. FAHR99-09: The General Manager recommends development of a new
comprehensive connection fee program and ordinance which contains the
following elements:
1. Base fees are determined by type of development, flow, BOD and SS, and
are calculated per 1,000 square feet for non-residential development and per
unit for residential development;
2. Residential fees are tiered based upon number of bedrooms and SFR or MFR
development;
3. Connection fees continue to be collected at the time the building permit is
issued;
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 6
February 10, 1999
4. Credit for demolished structures be granted only when the developer can
prove that prior connection fees were paid, and credit provided only for the
amount actually paid;
5. The new connection fee program should be reported to the RAC prior to final
consideration by the Board.
After considerable discussion on this item, the Committee determined that a
FAHR Committee Workshop should be held, with invitations to the full Board in
order for all Board members to become familiar with the connection fee issues.
After the Workshop, this item will be sent to the RAC Committee, then back to the
FAHR Committee, and then to the Board with a recommendation.
A decision as to the date and time of the Workshop will be determined at a later
date.
D. FAHR99-10: Review, approve and forward the Mid-Year Report for the Quarter
ended December 31, 1998, to the Board of Directors.
In response to Director Swan's questions, Mr. Streed advised he would provide
additional information at the next Committee meeting.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation.
E. FAHR99-11: Approve the 1999-2000 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy
Statements, and Budget Calendar, and direct staff to prepare the 1999-2000
Budget incorporating these parameters.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation
with modifications to the Budget Assumptions on pages 1 and 2, as delineated by
Director Swan.
(14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION
There were none.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
Director Peer Swan requested that items such as the District's Investment Policy and strategy, the
Financing Policy, what debt we have outstanding and what is planned for the future, as well as the
five-year staff reduction program, be agendized for a future meeting for the benefit of the Committee's
new Directors.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 7
February 10, 1999
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for March 10, 1999 at 5,00 p.m.
(19) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by
Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item
19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:55 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda
Item 19 (A)(1).
At 8:10 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:12 p.m.
Submitted by:
Ij
erora Crane
FAHR Committee Secretary
tnwo.anr vrmv.rekaxK.rwovenaaomv.ecc
FAHIR COMMITTEE Meen_g`Sae TOXads.
02/10/99 02/24/99
AGENDA REPORT Iem (a) roemNum
2 e) /T
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
JANUARY1999 (FAHR99-01)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1999.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused
by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
.I" ac
R," MW - Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of January 1999 is attached. The
attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements
for the next six months,
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts January 31, 1999 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 21,73E739 5.5
Union Bank Checking Account 42,911 3.7
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement -0- —
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18,473,625 5.0
PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 301,239,709 4.2
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,331 5.3
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,197,021 6.0
Petry Cash 4,400
TOTAL $373,695,736
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None,
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SK:Ic
\4atlonWatlMq.EpNnVtpc,aneVAHRFa�MPFeEFAHRWpt Oo[
Rm . 1N17.7 Page 2
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII
\\ IIIIIII\ nnw\
..... ..... ,.... .....
..... ..... ,.... ,....
:❖1 -
❖:❖:': :❖: ❖:':8 ':❖:❖:
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for(he month ending 31 January 1999)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
PP���� $18476,617
Mellonno $18:473,625
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $18494,063
Mellon $18:494,050
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.41
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $76,562 (0.41%)
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 45%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return (%) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: 0.40 0.37
3 Months: 1.23 1.11
12 Months: 5.56 4.98
Year-to-Date: 0.40 0.37
N1.IFINANCE17101KOZAKLSAMPLELIQ0199.VT
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 January 1999)
Long-Term Operating Monies (103)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current
PMarket Value Estimate: $301,809,245
Mello $301,239,709
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $300,077,956
Mellon $299,856,848
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.34
Of Index: 2.31
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gainlloss)of 1%Change: $7,161,841
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index
by Period:
1 Month: 0.53 0.51
3 Months: 1.00 0.70
12 Months: 7.45 6.93
Year-to-Date: 0.53 0.51
H. WINANCEQIOIKOZIK[SAMPLELIDI 99.RPT
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-JAN-1999 HB1300
8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 1,977,841.00 1,977,841.00 10.59% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 1,089,412.50 1,089,412.50 5.83% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS INN 1YR 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 19.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 1,378,440.00 1,378,440.00 7.38% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 141,014.24 141,014.24 0.76% 0.00 6,369.25 4.52
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 8,140,934.74 8,140,934.74 43.60% 0.00 6,369.25 0.08
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,315,477.00 17.76% -9,788.63 210,375.00 6.35
U.S. AGENCIES 3,699,104.60 3,693,636.00 19.78% -5,468.60 178,895.00 4.84
BANKING 6 FINANCE 1,953,792.00 1,951,342.00 30.45% -2,450.00 164,750.00 8.44
INDUSTRIAL 063,753.00 861,415.50 4.61% -2,337.50 60,562.50 7.03
UTILITY - ELECTRIC 511,200.00 510,820.00 2.74% -380.00 40,000.00 7.83
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 20,353,115.23 10,332,690.50 55.34% -20,424.73 654,582.50 6.34
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 198,836.46 198,836.46 1.06% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 198,836.46 198,836.46 1.06% 0.00 0.00 0.00
.. ....___�.»....... .................. ........ ................. ................ .......
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,692,886.43 18,672,461.70 100.00% -20,424.73 660,951.75 3.54
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-JAN-1999 HB1100
8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 595,104.20 595,1D4.20 0.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00
RECEIVABLES 18,801,398.82 18,801,398.B2 6.15% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -37,801, 145.32 -37,801,145.32 -12.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 8,741,464.67 8,741,464.67 2.66% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -9,663, 177.63 -9,663,177.63 -3.16% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 121,957,301.86 123,110,049.94 40.25, 1,152,748.08 7,683,195.54 6.24
U.S. AGENCIES 53,410,845.06 54,024,395.96 17.66% 613,550.90 3,314,894.86 6.14
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,800,312.50 16,793,182.50 5.49% -7,130.00 1,057,500.00 6.30
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,490,977.60 5,471,573.02 1.791 -19,404.58 372,921.05 6.82
FHLMC POOLS 14,279,008.92 14,150,014.55 4.63% -128,994.37 984,153.23 6.96
FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,084,918.63 7,209,178.58 2.36% 124,259.95 446,776.50 6.20
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 228,990.55 230,147.95 0.08% 1,157.40 14,197.41 6.17
OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,332,878.61 4,359,469.26 1.43% 26,590.65 250,487.38 5.75
BANKING 6 FINANCE 66,473,017.70 66,421,901.82 21.72% -51,115.88 3,956,928.69 5.96
INDUSTRIAL 11,964,519.00 11,407,223.10 3.73% -557,295.90 963,627.00 8.45
UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,725,750.00 2.53% 228,495.00 450,000.00 5.82
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 309,520,025.43 310,902,886.68 101.66% 1,382,861.25 19,494,681.66 6.27
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,598,767.09 4,598,767.09 1.50% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------""--- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,598,767.09 4,598,767.09 1.50% 0.00 0.00 0.00
09,9a NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3 55 619 89 305,838,476.14 100.00% 1,382,861.25 19,494,681.66 6.37
Page 1
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
MSF07512102 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RIM TIME : 11.25.18
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
CASH R CASK EQUIVALENTS
141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT .000 4.517 AAA 100,008 142,014.24 1.73
996085247 141,014.24 .76
900,000.00 FORD KID CA CO DISC 4.8S4 .000 P-1 98.885 889,962.00 10.93
34539URM6 04/21/1999 889,962.00 4.82
900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.944 .000 P-1 98.873 889,857.00 10.15
OMISR78 04/07/1999 $89,857.00 4.82
1,100,000.00 FED MORE LN MG CORP DISC 4.998 .000 P-1 99.037 1,089,412.50 13.38
313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 1,089,412.50 5.90
1,400,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 5.027 .000 P-1 98.460 1,378,440.00 16.93
313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 1,378,440.00 7.46
5,600,000.00 FEDERAL IWTL MTG ASSN DISC 5.095 .000 P-1 98.729 3,554,227.00 43.65
313588RM6 MAT 02/05/1999 3,554,227.00 19.24
200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.212 .000 P-1 99.011 198,022.00 2.43
36959JP23 OUO2/1999 198,022.00 1.07
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASK EQUIVALENTS 4.802 .168 8,140,934.74 100.00
8,140,934.74 44.07
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BK CONS BDS 4.860 4.843 AAA 99.828 3,699,104.60 35.74
3133M7EN2 4.8352 01/28/2000 DO 01/28/99 3,693,636.00 19.99
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST R REF MTG 5.001 7.831 AA3 102.164 511,200.00 4.94
2643990B9 6.000% 11/01/1999 GO 11/01/% 5101820.00 2.77
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.557 A2 105.515 529,010.00 5.10
171205AT4 13.2502 10/15/1999 527,575.00 2.86
850,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 7.031 A2 101.343 663,753.00 8.33
71eIS4BX4 7.1257. 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 861,415.50 4.66
900,000.00 GENERAL M7RS ACCEP CORP HIM 5.305 6.185 A2 101.048 909,657.00 8.00
37042MM2 6.2502 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 909,432.00 4.92
YLDANAL YIELD AMLYSIS PAGE 2
MSF07SI1102 1999/O1/31 RUN DATE O2/OS/99
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION 800K YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
3,300,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.345 AAA 100.469 3.325.265.63 32.08
912827K72 06.37SX 05/15/1999 DO OS/15/96 3,315,477.00 17.95
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN NTN 0S000110 5.653 8.214 A3 102.867 515,125.00 4.97
89UOKEPI 8.450% 011IV2000 DO 01/12/95 514:355.00 2.78
TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 5.059 6.011 10,353,115.23 100.00
10,332,690.50 55.93
TOTAL 4.963 3.837 18,494,049.97 100.00
18,473,625.24 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUM DATE 02/05/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.25.18
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ----------
CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS
2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.801 .000 P-1 99.154 1,983,075.56 22.68
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 1,983,075.56 .62
5,900,000.00 FORD "TR CR CO DISC 4.834 .000 P-1 99.307 3.872,960.00 44.30
34539UQKI 03/19/1999 31872,960.00 1.21
2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 4.913 .000 P-2 99.498 2,885,429.11 33.00
02680KQSO 03/05/1999 2,895,429.11 .90
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.836 .000 8,741,464.67 100.00
8,741,464.67 2.73
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.937 A2 97.606 1,992,800.00 .62
066365DH4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 119521120.00 .61
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MIN .000 5.032 A2 99.562 3,498,635.00 1.12
17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 OD 04/08/98 3,484,670.00 1.09
2,000,000.00 FORD "TR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.363 Al 19.765 1,998,613.60 .ba
345397SC8 FLTG RT 08/27/2006 00 08/27/98 1,995,300.00 .62
7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTH TR 8 00177 .000 4.365 Al 99.890 6,999,748.00 2.28
345402HJ3 VAR/RT OV30/1999 DD 03/30/94 7,092,190.00 2.22
5,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS .000 5.551 A2 99.199 3,918,768.50 1.26
370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 3,918,360.50 1.23
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR HT .000 6.192 A3 99.931 2,999,310.00 .96
423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 00 04/27/% 2,997,930.00 .94
4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTH .000 5.910 A3 99.953 4,000,000.00 1.28
42333HJH3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 OD 04/07/98 31998,120.00 1.25
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .900 5.999 AZ 99.140 4,000,000.00 1.27
44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 3,965,600.00 1.24
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTH SR 800570 .ODO 5.782 A2 99.344 999,188.90 .31
44181KZ74 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DD 09/04/98 993,440.00 .31
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4
OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ _---___.__
7,000,004.00 MORGAN ST DEAN HITTER SR NOTES .000 5.692 U3 99.875 71003,710.00 2.24
61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 61991,250.00 2.19
4,302,697.56 STUDENT LN WIG ASSN 1997-1 Al .000 5.746 AAA 99.476 4,332,076.61 1.40
76442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,359.469.26 1.36
7,166,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.699 3.631 AU 99.844 711"1900.19 2.30
9128273AS 3.625X 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,156,887.81 2.24
10,351,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.729 3.472 AAA 97.219 10,072,010.47 3.23
9128272M3 3.375X 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 10,063,333.13 3.15
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 5.980 AAA 304.516 9,034,223.67 2.85
912827206 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,883,860.00 2.78
19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSM MTN 4.943 6.369 AU 104.719 20,012,510.00 6.39
31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 05/27/97 19,896,610.00 6.22
5,000.000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 8.829 AU 126.000 6,233,593.75 2.02
912810DE5 11.125X OB/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,300,000.00 1.97
51,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.2% 6.113 AAA 104.281 52,509,817.31 10.56
912827Z54 06.3757. 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 32,848,515.00 10.28
17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 6.965 AAA 107.375 18,388,684.02 5.90
912827025 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 18,361,125.00 5.74
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.553 5.%2 AAA 105.187 2,566,119.75 .84
9128273G5 06.2507. 08/31/Z002 DO 09/02/97 21629,675.00 .82
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.112 AAA 130.328 6,698,250.00 2.17
9228100G0 11.875X 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,777.056.00 2.12
1,500,000.90 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.308 AA3 103.049 1,343,225.00 .49
046003WS 6.SOOZ 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,545,735.00 .48
1,OOO,DDO.00 HELLER FINANCIAL MC NTS 5.760 5.772 A3 99.627 999,730.00 .32
42333MJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 996,270.00 .31
16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.149 AAA 105.703 16,581,D67.03 5.47
9128272N1 06.SOOX 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 17,0181163.OD 5.32
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.252 AU 105.969 3,613,203.15 1.19
912827250 06.625X 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 3,709,915.00 1.16
YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 5
OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/OS/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY HARKET TOTAL COST/ I TYPE
SECURITY TO SEMITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE I TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _-________
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MUM 5.804 6.546 A2 163.062 2,060,739.00 .66
8124000N6 6.5402 OV2012003 OD 02/20/97 21066,393.10 .65
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.974 MA 104.625 5,086,402.25 1.68
9128272L5 06.2507. 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 5,231,250.00 1.64
14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSH MTN 5.882 5.6% AAA 100.250 14,560,462.50 4.75
31364GLD9 5.7107. 12/15/2008 DO 12/15/98 14,786,875.00 4.63
6,000,000.00 NATIONSSAMK CHARLOTTE N C MTH 5.882 5.830 AA1 100.343 519961400.00 1.93
63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6.020,580.00 1.88
1,074,554.60 FHLMC MULTICL MG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.889 100.187 1,073,023.53 .34
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 1,076,543.98 .34
1,571,770.90 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 5.957 5.888 AAA 100.207 11568,516.85 .50
161614AEZ 5.900I 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/95 1,575,OM.47 .49
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO MR GNMA I SF MG 5.993 6.438 AAA 100.969 10,605,000.00 3.4D
01N062631 6.SOOY. 03/15/2028 10,601,745.00 3.32
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.258 AA3 101.997 215261725.00 .82
59018SXM 6.575% 10/01/2001 DO 1D/03/97 2,549,925.00 - .80
7,50D,000.00 SELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.825 AAA 103.010 7,497,255.00 2.48
079867AKS 6.000% 06/15/2002 OD 06/15/98 7,725,750.00 2.42
1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HTS 6.032 6.870 A2 303.711 11283,862.50 .41
370425QF0 7.1257. 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/97 1,296,387.50 .41
1,000,400.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN 6.046 6.533 A2 102.562 11018,520.00 .32
37042RGK1 6.7007. 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,025,620.00 .32
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO MR OMNA SF HTG 6.060 6.057 AM 99.063 6,195,312.50 1.99
OIN060635 6.000% 03/15/2029 6,191,437.50 1.94
4,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR PHMA SF MTG 6.0% 6.118 AM 100.532 4,244,617.19 1.36
11F011628 6.1507. 02/25/2029 4,252,471.88 1.33
228,990.56 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 964 CLA 6.200 6.169 AAA 100.505 228,990.55 .07
31677EAA4 6.2007. 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 230,147.95 .07
2,500,000.DO LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTH TR 00252 6.232 6.354 BAA1 100.722 2,509,175.00 .80
52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 2,518,050.00 .79
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RON TIME 11.25.18
------------
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----_____-
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL WE ASSN MIN 6.291 6.026 AAA 103.391 4,488,705.00 1.49
31364CKV5 6.230Z 0U01/2002 OU 03/03/97 4,652,595.00 1.46
4,006,624.85 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.326 6.277 AAA 100.751 4,011,007.20 1.29
3133TCE95 6.3242 08/15/2032 4,056,714.60 1.26
2.000,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC 6.330 6.554 A2 102.996 21031,960.00 .66
073902AHI 6.7502 04/15/2003 2,059,920.00 .64
5,000,000.00 LENMAN EMS HUGS NTH 000196 6.364 6.618 BAAI 100.484 5,039,450.00 1.61
52517PJ 6.6502 12/08/2000 OD 11/08/96 5,024,200.00 1.57
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR CUTS 6.425 6.620 A2 101.967 1,317,619.35 .42
073902AN8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1,330,669.35 .42
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.203 AAA 104.796 21000,888.00 .67
3133TUPV2 6.SOOY. 09/25/2018 2,095,920.OD .66
2,247,914.31 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.566 6.227 AAA 96.349 2,091,774.37 .69
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 OD 11/01/93 2,165,844.08 .68
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL MATL WE ASSM MIN 6.577 6.409 AAA 103.375 0,012,576.00 2.65
31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,270,000.00 2.59
9,000,080.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.912 A2 103.787 9,903,780.00 3.00
718154BB2 9.25D7. CVlSI2000 9,340,830.00 2.92
14,059,331.86 FHLMC GROUP MS-0476 6.628 6.955 AAA 100.645 14.279,008.92 4.55
3128DDQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 14,150,014.55 4.43
3,000,000.00 G M A C HED TERM NTS 6.660 6.372 A2 103.018 5,227,070.00 .99
37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,090,540.00 .97
3,208,905.77 DENA II POOL 0080088H 6.705 6.7" AAA 101.625 3,279,100.60 1.04
3622SM20 6.975% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 3,261,050.49 1.02
2,175,839.65 CKMA II POOL 80080023 6.869 6.890 AAA 101.594 2,211,877.00 .71
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 2,210,522.53 .69
2,500,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOIRES 6.906 8.018 AAA 165.250 4,029,030.31 1.32
912810DA 13.2507. 05/15/2014 DO OS115184 4,131,250.00 1.29
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE T
OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.25.10
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION GOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- __'____' ------------ ----------
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.155 6.034 309,520,025.45 100.00
310:902,"6.60 97.20
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 4.156 6.023 316,261,490.10 100.00
319,644,3S1.35 100.00
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-JAN-1999 -33.00 -33.00 0.000000
NA9123459 11 OCSF0752222 FOR 1/14/99 ----------- -33.00 0.00 0.000000
CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
313396BHS FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
313396BH5 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0/000000
313396BHS FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
313396BH5 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 04-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 04-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827Z54 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 5 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
Page 1
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USG
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-JAN-1999 -889,857.00 -889,857.00 98.873000
02581SR78 04/07/1999 13-JAN-1999 889,857.00 889,857.00 98.873000
B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-JAN-1999 -689,857.00 -889,857.00 98.873000
025SISR78 04/07/1999 13-JAN-1999 -889,857.00 0.00 98.873000
FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,BOO,ODO.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 25-JAN-1999 -4,775,882.67 -4,775,882.67 99.497555
02680KQ50 03/05/1999 26-JAN-1999 4,775,882.67 4,775,882.67 99.497555
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,800,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 25-JAN-1999 -4,115,882.67 -4,775,882.67 99.497555
02680KOSO 03/05/1999 26-JAN-1999 -4,775,882.67 0.00 99.497555
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,015.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153717
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 21-JAN-1999 1,983,075.56 1,983,075.56 99.153777
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,075.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153777
19121EQS5 03/26/1999 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,075.56 0.00 99.153777
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750
BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 0.00 99.408750
FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 03-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00OODDOOD
0.00
Page 2
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/SASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 -1,797,535.00 99.863055
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 05-JAN-1999 1,797,535.00 1,797,535.00 99.863055
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 -1,797,535.00 99.863055
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 0.00 99.863055
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 05-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 -3,872,960.00 99.306666
34539UQK1 03/19/1999 26-JAN-1999 3,872,960.00 3,872,960.00 99.306666
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 -3,872,960.00 99.306666
34539UQKI 03/19/1999 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 0.00 99.306666
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 -889,962.00 98.884667
34539URM6 04/21/1999 27-JAN-1999 889,962.00 889,962.00 98.884667
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 -889,962.00 98.884667
34539URM6 04/21/1999 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 0.00 98.884667
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
865.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 -865.95 1.000000
996085247 04-JAN-1999 865.95 865.95 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
865.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 -865.95 1.000000
996085247 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 0.00 1.000000
PC 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 3
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,212.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 -6,212.97 1.000000
996085247 04-JAN-1999 6,212.97 6,212.97 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,212.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 -6,212.97 1.000000
996085247 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 0.00 1.000000
PC 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,740,341.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 -1,740,341.01 1.000000
996085247 07-JAN-1999 1,740,341.01 1,740,341.01 1.000D00
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,740,341.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 -1,740,341.01 1.000000
996085247 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 0.00 1.000000
FC 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10,143.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 -10,143.00 1.000000
996085247 13-JAN-1999 10,143.00 10,143.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10,143.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 -10,143.00 1.000000
996085247 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,646,975.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 -1,646,975.93 1.000000
996085247 15-JAM-1999 1,646,975.93 1,646,975.93 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,646,975.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 -1,646,975.93 1.000000
996085247 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 0.00 1.000000
PC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 4
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
D1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
52,660.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 -52,660.06 1.000000
996085247 19-JAN-1999 52,660.06 52,660.06 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
357,137.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 -357,137.13 1.000000
996085247 19-JAN-1999 357,137.13 357,137.13 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
52,660.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 -52,660.06 1.000000
996085247 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 0.00 1.000000
FC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000D00000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
357,137.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 -357,137.13 1.000000
996085247 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 0.00 1.000000
FC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
334,589.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 -334,589.76 1.000000
996085247 20-JAN-1999 334,589.76 334,589.76 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
334,509.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 -334,589.76 1.000000
996085247 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 0.00 1.000000
FC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
9,971.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 -9,971.75 1.000000
996085247 27-JAN-1999 9,971.75 9,971.75 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
9,971.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 -9,971.75 1.000000
996085247 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 0.00 1.000000
Page 5
OCSG000IOO MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000O0OODO
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 -141,014.24 1.000000
996085247 29-JAN-1999 141,014.24 141,014.24 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 -141,014.24 1.000000
996085247 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 0.00 1.00OOOD
PC 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
195,749.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-JAN-1999 -195,749.00 -195,749.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 15-JAN-1999 195,749.00 195,749.00 1.000000
B 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.632812
O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.632812
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.632812
OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 0.00 98.632812
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,154,296.88 -6,154,296.88 98.468750
O1N060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,154,296.88 -6,154,296.88 98.468750
OIN060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 6
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 -6,195,312.50 -6,195,312.50 99.125000
OIN060635 6.000% 03/15/2029 23-MAR-1999 6,195,312.50 6,195,312.50 99.125000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000
01N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000
FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NO 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-DEC-1998 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000
01H062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.000000
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-DEC-1998 6,060,000.00 61060,000.00 101.000000
01NO62615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750
01NO62623 6.5001 02/15/2028 22-FEB-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750
01NO62623 6.500% 02/15/2028 22-FEB-1999 6,058,125.00 6,058,125.00 100.968750
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750
OIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,059,125.00 6,058,125.00 100.968750
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 7
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750
O1N062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 -10,605,000.00 -10,605,000.00 101.000000
OIN062631 6.500% 03/15/2028 23-MAR-1999 10,605,000.00 10,605,000.00 101.000000
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1990 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500
11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500
B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500
11F011610 6.1501 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500
FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1990 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750
IIF0I1610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,016,875.00 2,016,875.00 100.843750
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750
1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,875.00 0.00 100.843750
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000
1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -2,237,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.328125
IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.328125
B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 8
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.802000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -17,298.61 -17,298.61 105.802000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.902000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000
171205AT4 13.2501 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.602000
BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 17,298.61 17,298.61 105.802000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.802000
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.802000
171205AT4 13.2504 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000,00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -17,298.61 -17,298.61 105.802000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.802000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -546,308.61 -546,308.61 105.802000
171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 -546,308.61 0.00 105.802000
FC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DD 11/02/94 22-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000
B NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 9
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -9,000.00 -9,000.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST & REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000
SC NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 9,000.00 9,000.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000
B NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -9,000.00 -9,000.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 4 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -520,200.00 -520,200.00 102.240000
264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 -520,200.00 0.00 102.240000
PC NATIONSBANC CAPITAL MARKETS IN 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP 8GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/202B DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 171,907.15 171,907.15 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY d CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP 4G0-0950 19-OCT-1998 -376.47 -376.47 98.937500
31293HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/9B 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
Page 10
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,283.62 -172,283.62 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -172,283.62 0.00 98.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 999,268.66 999,268.66 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -2,188.33 -2,188.33 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,001,456.99 -1,001,456.99 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500
31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 72B,510.14 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.937500
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -730,105.53 -730,105.53 98.937500
312B3HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -730,105.53 0.00 9B.937500
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -392,511.65 -392,511.65 99.453125
Page 11
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31293HE90 6.000% O1/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 392,511.65 392,511.65 99.453125
B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -855.12 -855.12 99.453125
31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -393,366.77 -393,366.77 99.453125
31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -393,366.77 0.00 99.453125
PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -270,758.30 -270,758.30 98.937500
31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 270,758.30 270,758.30 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -592.94 -592.94 98.937500
31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -271,351.24 -271,351.24 98.937500
31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -271,351.24 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -827,360.89 -827,360.89 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% O1/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 827,360.89 827,360.89 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -1,811.87 -1,811.87 98.937500
31293H%U2 6.000% O1/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 12
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE 'BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-199B -829,172.76 -829,172.76 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -829,172.76 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -105,457.48 -105,457.48 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 105,457.48 105,457.48 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -230.95 -230.95 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -105,690.43 -105,688.43 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -105,688.43 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY i CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.75 -999,268.75 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 999,268.75 999,268.75 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -2, 188.33 -2,1BB.33 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -1,001,457.08 -1,001,457.08 98.937500
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,457.08 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -592,074.29 -592,D74.29 99.453125
31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD OI/DI/99 14-JAN-1999 592,074.29 592,074.29 99.453125
B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 13
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -1,289.88 -1,289.88 99.453125
31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -593,364.17 -593,364.17 99.453125
31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -593,364.17 0.00 99.453125
FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -492,292.97 -492,292.97 99.453125
31293JCC1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 492,292.97 492,292.97 99.453125
B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -1,072.50 -1,072.50 99.453125
31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -493,365.47 -493,365.47 99.453125
31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -493,365.47 0.00 99.453125
FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1998 -643,994.08 -643,994.08 98.937500
31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 643,994.08 643,994.00 98.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1999 -1,410.31 -1,410.31 98.937500
31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1998 -645,404.39 -645,404.39 98.937500
31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -645,404.39 0.00 98.937500
FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 14
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 21-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 -3,699,104.60 99.975800
3133M7EW2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO O1/28/99 28-JAN-1999 3,699,104.60 3,699,104.60 99.975800
B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 21-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 -3,699,104.60 99.975800
3133M7EW2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO O1/28/99 28-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 0.00 99.975800
PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -909,657.00 -909,657.00 101.073000
37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO O1/11/94 20-JAN-1999 909,657.00 909,657.00 101.073000
B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -17,031.25 -17,031.25 101.073000
37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 101.073000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -926,688.25 -926,688.25 1D1.073000
37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO O1/11/94 20-JAN-1999 -926,688.25 0.00 101.073000
FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
850,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 31-DEC-1998 -869,641.02 -869,641.02 101.618000
718154BX4 7.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 06-JAN-1999 -069,641.02 0.00 101.618000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 06-JAN-1999 -2,060,739.00 -2,060,739.00 102.780000
81240QGW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 2,060,739.00 2,060,739.00 102.780000
B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN O6-JAN-1999 -20,397.53 -20,397.53 102.780000
81240QGWG 6.54D6 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.780000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 15
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN O6-JAN-1999 -2,081,136.53 -2,081, 136.53 102.780000
812400GW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 -2,081,136.53 0.00 102.780000
FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN 8SB00110 07-JAN-1999 -515,125.00 -515,125.00 103.025000
89350MEPI 8.450% 01/12/2000 DD O1/12/95 12-JAN-1999 515,125.00 515,125.00 103.025000
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN 8SB00110 07-JAN-1999 -15,374.31 -15,374.31 103.025000
89350MEP1 8.450% 01/12/2000 DO O1/12/95 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 103.025000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN ISBOO110 07-JAN-1999 -530,499.31 -530,499.31 103.025000
89350MEP1 8.450% 01/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 12-JAM-1999 -530,499.31 0.00 103.025000
FC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,652,219.02 -6,652,219.02 128.086500
912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-1999 -6,652,219.02 0.00 128.086500
FC HSSC SECS INC, NEW YORK 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 -2,493,950.00 -2,493,950.00 100.562500
999ACW396 6.1508 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,493,950.00 0.00 100.562500
FC BEAR STEARNS 8 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PAY UPS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 -11, 12B.10 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 11,128.10 11,128.10 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Pape 16
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 -11,128.10 100.000000
3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 0.00 100.000000
PC 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 -11,183.54 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 11,183.54 11,183.54 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 -11,183.54 100.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 0.00 100.000000
PC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556
02680KQ50 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 95.00 95.00 99.497556
02680KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,549.56 1,890,548.56 99.497556
02680K050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 20-JAN-1999 3,555,589.00 3,555,589.00 98.766361
313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 20-JAN-1999 -3,555,589.00 -3,555,589.00 98.766361
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-JAN-1999 41,579.00 41,579.00 98.766361
313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.766361
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 17
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 28-JAN-1999 3,597,168.00 3,597,168.00 98.766361
313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 28-JAN-1999 3,597,168.00 0.00 98.766361
PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAM-1999 792,300.00 792,300.00 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 -792,300.00 -792,300.00 99.037500
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAM-1999 4,944.00 4,944.00 99.037500
3133968H5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAN-1999 797,244.00 797,244.00 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 797,244.00 0.00 99.037500
PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 396,150.00 396,150.00 99.037500
313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 -396,150.00 -396,150.00 99.037500
S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 2,781.11 2,781.11 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 398,931.11 398,931.11 99.037500
313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 398,931.11 0.00 99.037500
PC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FED HOME IN MSG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 594,225.00 594,225.00 99.037500
313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 -594,225.00 -594,225.00 99.037500
Page 18
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 4,743.67 4,743.67 99.037500
313396885 MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 598,968.67 598,968.67 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 598,968.67 0.00 99.037500
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 495,187.50 495,187.50 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 -495,187.50 -495,187.50 99.037500
S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 4, 158.33 4,158.33 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 499,345.83 499,345.83 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 499,345.83 0.00 99.037500
PC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 99,037.50 99,037.50 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 -99,037.50 -99,037.50 99.037500
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 896.25 896.25 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 99,933.75 99,933.75 99.037500
Page 19
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 99,933.75 0.00 99.037500
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 198,075.00 198,075.00 99.031500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 -198,075.00 -198,075.00 99.037500
S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 1,847.50 1,847.50 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 199,922.50 299,922.50 99.037500
313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 199,922.50 0.00 99.037500
FC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -298,226.25 -298,226.25 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 298,226.25 298,226.25 99.408750
SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -376.75 -376.75 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -298,603.00 -298,603.00 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 -298,603.00 0.00 99.408750
FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,226.25 298,226.25 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 -298,226.25 -298,226.25 99.408750
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 20
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 376.75 376.75 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 298,603.00 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 0.00 99.408750
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -596,452.50 -596,452.50 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 596,452.50 596,452.50 99.408750
SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -2,488.00 -2,488.00 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 I.DDD000DOO
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -598,940.50 -598,940.50 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 -598,940.50 0.00 99.40875D
FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 596,452.50 596,452.50 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 -596,452.50 -596,452.50 99.408750
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 2,488.00 2,488.00 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750
is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 598,940.50 598,940.50 99.408750
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 598,940.50 0.00 99.408750
PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 03-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 21
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 1,497,945.83 1,497,945.83 99.063055
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 -1,497,945.83 -1,497,945.83 99.863055
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 454.17 454.17 99.863055
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.863055
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 1,498,400.00 1,498,400.00 99.863055
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 1,498,400.00 0.00 99.863055
PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 497,398.06 497,398.06 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -497,398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00OOOOODD
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 1,576.94 1,576.94 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.479612
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 498,975.00 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 0.00 99.479612
FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -497,398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 497,398.06 497,398.06 99.479612
SC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -1,576.94 -1,576.94 99.479612
36959JNS8 O1/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 59.479612
Isc ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.D00000000
0.00
Page 22
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -498,975.00 -498,975.00 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -498,975.00 0.00 99.479612
FCC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 497, 398.06 497,398.06 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -497, 398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 1,576.94 1,576.94 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.479612
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 499,975.00 99.479612
36959JNS8 01/26/1999 II-JAN-1999 498,975.00 0.00 99.479612
FC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-946,462.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 946,462.44 1.000000
996085247 05-JAN-1999 -946,462.44 -946,462.44 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-946,462.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 946,462.44 1.000000
996085247 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 0.00 1.000000
PC 05-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-72,397.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O6-JAN-1999 72,397.02 72,397.02 1.000000
996085247 06-JAN-1999 -72,397.02 -72,397.02 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-72,397.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-JAN-1999 72,397.02 72,397.02 1.000000
996085247 06-JAN-1999 72,397.02 0.00 1.000000
PC O6-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 23
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000
996085247 08-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000
996085247 08-JAN-1999 3.00 0.00 1.000000
FC 08-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,582,161.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 1,582,161.53 1.000000
996085247 11-JAN-1999 -1,582,161.53 -1,582, 161.53 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,582,161.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 1,592,161.53 1.000000
996085247 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 0.00 1.000000
FC 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-131,568.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 131,568.20 1.000000
996085247 12-JAN-1999 -131,568.20 -131,568.20 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-131,568.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 131,568.20 1.000000
996085247 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 0.00 1.000000
FC 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-48,885.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 49,885.92 1.000000
996085247 14-JAN-1999 -48,885.92 -48,885.92 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-48,885.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 48,885.92 1/000000
996085247 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 0.00 1.000000
Page 24
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LASS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-26,691.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 26,691.25 1.000000
996085241 20-JAN-1999 -26,691.25 -26,691.25 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-26,691.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 26,691.25 2.000000
996085247 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 0.00 1.000000
PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,983,718.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 1,983,118.73 1.000000
996085247 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,718.73 -1,983,718.73 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,983,718.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 1,983,718.73 1.000000
996085247 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 0.00 1.000000
PC 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-20,954.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 20,854.17 1.000000
996095247 22-JAN-1999 -20,854.17 -20,854.17 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-20,854.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 20,854.17 1.000000
996085247 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 0.00 1.000000
PC 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-464,277.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JAN-1999 464,277.65 464,277.65 1.000000
996085247 25-JAN-1999 -464,277.65 -464,277.65 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-464,277.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JAM-1999 464,277.65 464,277.65 1.000000
Page 25
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
996085247 25-JAN-1999 464,277.65 0.00 1.000000
FC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
-3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000
996085247 26-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000
5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000
996085247 26-JAN-1999 3.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-43,031.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 43,031.34 1.000000
996085247 28-JAN-1999 -43,031.34 -43,031.34 1.000000
S - ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-43,031.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 43,031.34 1.000000
996085247 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 0.00 1.000000
PC 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875
OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.546875
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,371.06 -5,371.06 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,159,179.69 -6,159,179.69 96.546875
O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.546875
SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 5,371.06 5,371.06 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,203,125.00 6,203,125.00 99.250000
OIN060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,154,296.89 -6,154,296.88 99.250000
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 48,828.12 48,828.12 1.000000000
0.00
Page 26
0CSG000100 MELLON TRUST _
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 6,064,218.72 6,064,210.72 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAM-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070312
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218.72 4,218.72 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.72 -6,064,218.72 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.070312
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -4,218.72 -4,218.72 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,548,164.04 4,548,164.04 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.04 3,164.04 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -4,548,164.04 -4,548,164.04 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.070312
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -3,164.04 -3,164.04 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070313
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218.75 4,218.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,210.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 0.00 101.070313
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.06 3,164.06 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,549,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312
OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312
FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 27
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,068,671.86 6,068,671.86 101.144531
01NO62623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 101.144531
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 10,546.86 10,546.86 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 4,551,503.90 4,551,503.90 101.144531
DIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 101.144531
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 7,910.15 7,910.15 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188
11F0116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 2,012,812.50 2,012,812.50 100.867188
SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -4,531.26 -4,531.26 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188
11F0116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 0.00 100.867188
FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188
11FO116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 -2,012,812.50 -2,012,812.50 100.867188
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 4,531.25 4,531.25 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188
11FO116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1999 2,017,343.75 0.00 100.867188
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 29-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 06-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 2,237,839.83 100.351562
11FO11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,245,509.18 -2,245,509.18 100.351562
5 BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -7,669.35 -7,669.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 06-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 2,237,839.83 100.351562
11FO11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 0.00 100.351562
PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 28
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM10D
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORK GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST O6-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 2,008,046.88 100.402344
11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,013,909.57 -2,013,909.57 100.402344
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,862.69 -5,862.69 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST O6-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 2,008,046.88 100.402344
11FD11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 0.00 100.402344
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 723,677.95 723,677.95 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- -4,832.19 -4,832.19 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.281250
31283HETI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP OGO-0950 17-MOV-1998 725,273.34 725,273.34 98.281250
31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 725,273.34 0.00 98.281250
FC GOLDMAN SACHS c CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP YC2-0160 17-NOV-1998 397,886.61 387,886.61 98.281250
31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -392,511.65 -392,511.65 99.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- -4,625.04 -4,625.04 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP YC2-0160 17-NOV-1998 855.12 855.12 98.281250
31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-394,670.O0 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0160 17-NOV-1998 388,741.73 388,741.73 98.281250
31293HE9D 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 388,741.73 0.00 98.281250
Page 29
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 268,962.37 268,962.37 98.281250
31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -270,758.30 -270,758.30 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -1,795.93 -1,795.93 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 592.94 592.94 9B.281250
31293HGS6 6.0001 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 269,555.31 269,555.31 98.281250
31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 269,555.31 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 104,757.98 104,757.98 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -105,457.48 -105,457.48 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -699.50 -699.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 230.95 230.95 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP ►C2-0691 17-NOV-1998 104,988.93 104,988.93 96.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 104,988.93 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 9C2-0691 17-NOV-1998 992,640.63 992,640.63 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.75 -999,268.75 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -6,628.12 -6,628.12 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO
-1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0691 17-NOV-1999 2,199.33 2,188.33 98.281250
Page 30
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 994,828.96 994,828.96 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 994,828.96 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 821,873.02 821,873.02 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -827,360.89 -827,360.89 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -5,487.87 -5,487.87 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 1,811.87 1,611.87 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-036,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 823,684.89 823,684.89 98.281250
31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 823,684.99 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1998 585,097.77 505,097.77 98.281250
31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -592,074.29 -592,074.29 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -6,976.52 -6,976.52 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1990 1,289.88 1,289.88 98.281250
31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 90.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1998 506,387.65 586,387.65 98.281250
31293H5V1 6.0001 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 586,387.65 0.00 90.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 31
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0967 17-NOV-1998 486,492.19 486,492.19 98.281250
31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -492,292.97 -492,292.97 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,800.78 -5,800.78 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0967 17-NOV-1998 1,072.50 1,072.50 98.291250
31293JCC1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 90.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0967 17-NOV-1998 487,564.69 487,564.69 98.281250
31293JCC1 6.000% 02/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 487,564.69 0.00 98.281250
EC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-1104 17-NOV-1998 639,722.48 639,722.48 98.281250
31293JGMS 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -643,994.09 -643,994.08 98.281250
S GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- -4,271.60 -4,271.60 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-1104 17-NOV-1998 1,410.31 1,410.31 98.281250
31293JGM5 6.0001 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-1104 17-NOV-1998 641,132.79 641,132.79 98.281250
31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 641,132.79 0.00 98.281250
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.00 FNMA POOL 00339016 17-NOV-1998 28,826.39 28,826.39 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 -28,847.87 -28,847.87 100.642369
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -21.48 -21.48 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1990 88.09 88.09 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 32
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
,CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,914.48 28,914.48 100.642369
31375MS06 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,914.48 0.00 100.642369
FC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1999 -28,826.39 -28,026.39 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,847.87 28,847.87 100.642369
SC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 21.49 21.48 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 -88.09 -88.09 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.1621 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 -28,914.48 -28,914.49 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 -28,914.48 0.00 100.642369
FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,826.39 28,826.39 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1999 -28,840.27 -28,848.27 100.642369
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -21.88 -21.88 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.40 FNMA POOL /0339016 17-NOV-1998 88.09 88.09 100.642369
31375HSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,914.48 28,914.49 100.642369
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,914.48 0.00 100.642369
PC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
163,368,42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 -163,369.42 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 163,030.20 163,030.20 100.000000
Page 33
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
PDC ----------- -338.22 -338.22 1.OD00D00D0
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 -163,368.42 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 0.00 100.000000
FCC 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-163,688.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 163,688.91 163,688.91 100.000000
161614AE2 5.9001 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -163,350.02 -163,350.02 100.000000
PD ----------- 338.89 338.89 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-163,668.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 163,688.91 163,688.91 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-2998 163,688.91 0.00 100.000000
PC 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JAN-1999 152,906.45 152,908.45 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 -152,591.88 -152,591.80 100.000000
PD ----------- 316.57 316.57 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-JAN-1999 152,908.45 152,908.45 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 152,908.45 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 767,464.30 100.000000
312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/99 01-JAN-1999 -779,455.93 -779,455.93 100.000000
PD ----------- -11,991.63 -11,991.63 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 767,464.30 100.000000
3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1999 65,822.98 65,822.98 100.000000
Page 34
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ,
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 -65,894.97 -65,894.97 100.000000
PD ----------- -71.99 -71.99 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1998 65,822.98 65,822.98 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 65,822.98 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-87,549.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-JAN-1999 87,549.50 87,549.50 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 -87,645.26 -87,645.26 100.000000
PD ----------- -95.76 -95.76 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-46,528.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-JAN-1999 46,528.05 46,528.05 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.9001 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 -46,462.62 -46,462.62 100.000000
PD ----------- 65.43 65.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-46,52B.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-JAN-1999 46,529.05 46,528.05 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 46,528.05 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
28,642.40 FNMA POOL 10339016 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 -28,642.40 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 28,848.27 28,848.27 100.000000
PDC ----------- 205.87 205.87 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 -28,642.40 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 0.00 100.000000
FCC 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 182,972.48 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.47 -182,972.47 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.01 0.01 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 35
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 182,972.48 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIHCO
182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.48 -182,972.48 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 182,972.47 182,972.47 100.000000
PDC ----------- -0.01 -0.01 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.48 -162,972.48 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAM-1999 -182,972.48 0.00 100.000000
FCC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 18,297.24 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -18,297.24 -16,297.24 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 18,297.24 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 0.00 100.000000
PC 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-118,528.70 GNMA II POOL 00080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.70 118,528.70 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 -120,491.83 -120,491.83 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,963.13 -1,963.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,528.70 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-JAN-1999 -118,528.70 -118,528.70 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/O1/96 01-JAN-1999 120,491.83 120,491.83 100.000000
PDC ----------- 1,963.13 1,963.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-118,528.50 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 118,528.50 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 -120,491.63 -120,491.63 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,963.13 -1,063.13 1.000000000
0.00
Page 36
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-118,528.50 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 118,528.50 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 0.00 100.000000
PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-164,036.68 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-JAN-1999 164,036.60 164,036,68 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 -167,624.98 -167,624.98 100.000000
PD ----------- -3,588.30 -3,588.30 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-164,036.68 GNMA II POOL 4080086M O1-JAN-1999 164,036.68 164,036.68 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 164,036.68 0.00 100.000000
PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 311,212.64 100.000000
78442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 25-JAN-1999 -307,675.03 -307,675.03 100.000000
PD ----------- 3,537.61 3,537.61 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 311,212.64 100.000000
78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DD 03/20/97 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 0.00 100.000000
FC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH i CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 -1,292,313.75 -1,292,313.75 100.000000
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 1,292,313.75 1,292,313.75 100.000000
MTC TO REVERSE 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 -198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000
MT 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000
Page 37
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE EASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
MTC 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1999 15-DEC-1998 -198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000
MT 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 15-JAN-1999 299,589.17 299,589.17 100.000000
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 15-JAN-1999 -299,589.17 -299,589.17 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 786,259.78 786,259.78 100.000000
34539UNTS 01/27/1999 27-JAN-1999 -786,259.78 -786,259.78 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 26-JAN-1999 14,424,543.61 14,424,543.61 100.000000
36959JNSS 01/26/1999 26-JAN-1999 -14,424,543.61 -14,424,543.61 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 GMAC DISC 20-JAN-1999 891,636.75 891,636.75 100.000000
37042ENL1 01/20/1999 20-JAN-1999 -891,636.75 -891,636.75 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-700,000.00 GMAC DISC 25-JAN-1999 696,464.42 696,464.42 100.000000
37042ENR8 01/25/1999 25-JAN-1999 -696,464.42 -696,464.42 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 IBM DISC 13-JAN-1999 883,021.50 883,021.50 100.000000
44922BND6 01/13/1999 13-JAN-1999 -883,021.50 -883,021.50 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
INTEREST
U.S. DOLLAR
Page 38
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR HIS 15-JAN-1999 48,750.00 48,750.00 0.000000
046003HYB 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 15-JAN-1999 48,750.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1998 -10,081.69 -10,081.69 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -10,081.69 0.00 0.000000
ITC 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 17-DEC-1998 -10,087.69 -10,087.69 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 12/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -10,087.69 0.00 0.000000
ITC 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 11000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
163,680.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A O6-JAN-1999 9,284.52 9,284.52 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 9,284.52 0.00 0.00000D
IT 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-JAN-1999 8,479.68 8,479.68 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 8,479.68 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 20-JAN-1999 19,316,62 19,316.62 0.000000
171200ESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/99 15-JAN-1999 19,316.62 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 15-JAN-1999 86,489.64 86,489.64 0.000000
3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-JAN-1999 86,489.64 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-JAN-1999 21,812.30 21,811.30 0.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 21,811.30 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 39
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-JAN-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-JAN-1999 30,833.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,528.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-JAN-1999 5,511.89 5,511.89 0.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 5,511.89 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 07-JAN-1999 11,128.10 11,128.10 0.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 11,128.10 0.00 0.000000
IT 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 19-JAN-1999 11,183.54 11,183.54 0.000000
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 11,183.54 0.00 0.000000
IT 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 1,182.50 2,182.50 0.000000
313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 1,182.50 0.00 0.000000
CD DIFF ON MATURITY 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
182,972.49 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 12,776.52 12,776.52 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 12,776.52 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 27-JAN-1999 1,277.66 1,277.66 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 1,277.66 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 25-JAN-1999 410.83 410.83 0.000000
34539UNF5 01/15/1999 15-JAN-1999 430.83 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 40
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 13,740.22 13,740.22 0.000000
34539UNT5 01/27/1999 27-JAN-1999 13,740.22 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,528.50 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-JAN-1999 13, 383.81 13,383.81 0.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 13, 383.81 0.00 O.D00000
IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00OD00000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
164,036.68 GNMA II POOL NOBOOBBM 20-JAN-1999 19,324.15 19,324.15 0.000000
36225CC20 6.875% O6/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 19,324.15 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00D000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 26-JAN-1999 75,456.39 75,456.39 0.000000
36959JNSO 01/26/1999 26-JAN-1999 75,456.39 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 G14AC DISC 2D-JAN-1999 8,363.25 8,363.25 0.000000
37042ENL1 01/20/1999 20-JAN-1999 8,363.25 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 GMAC DISC 25-JAN-1999 3,535.58 3,535.58 0.000000
37042ENRS 01/25/1999 25-JAN-1999 3,535.58 0.00 0.000000
IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 27-JAN-1999 41,854.02 41,854.02 0.000000
423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 27-JAN-1999 41,854.02 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 IBM DISC 13-JAN-1999 16,978.50 16,978.50 0.000000
44922BND6 01/13/1999 13-JAN-1999 16,978.50 0.00 0.000000
Page 41
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
IT 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 57,986.30 57,986.38 0.000000
78442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DD 03/20/97 25-JAM-1999 57,986.38 0.00 0.000000
IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-25,700.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 -25,700.00 -25,700.00 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -25,700.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 25,700.00 25,700.00 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 31-DEC-1998 25,700.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
PAYABLE 12/31/98 0.00
• LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,351,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 174,676.50 174,676.50 0.000000
9129272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 174,676.50 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 -17,780.00 -17,780.00 0.000000
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 25-JUL-2998 -17,780.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 17,780.00 17,780.00 0.000000
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 31-DEC-1998 17,780.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
PAYABLE 12/31/98 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,168,070.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 129,921.27 129,921.27 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 129,921.27 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 29-JAN-1999 -259.99 -258.99 0.000000
Page 42 0
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST a
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 29-JAN-1999 -258.99 0.00 0.000000
CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 04-JAN-1999 865.95 865.95 0.000000
996095247 01-JAN-1999 865.95 0.00 0.000000
IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 6,213.71 6,213.71 0.000000
996085247 01-JAN-1999 6,213.71 0.00 0.000000
IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PINCO
0.00 BSOT-LATE HONEY DEP ACCT 04-JAN-1999 5.26 5.26 0.000000
996087094 VAR AT DD 06/26/1997 01-JAN-1999 5.26 0.00 0.000000
IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 43
FAHR COMMITTEE rneeanoom r°e°•
�io/ss y2o/sv
AGENDA REPORT 1Oe,=��"` '��'f 7r
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 1998 (FAHR99-05)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period October 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly
reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two
funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies,"and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,"
are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the
District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment
Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has
tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the
District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months.
The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or
derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
%WdonWaWl yenun°+ocnn*TAHW@h u�AN�,.
R—. „� Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports
The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment
Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for your
reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector
diversification of the District's portfolios, as of September 30, 1998, and
December 31, 1998. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average
maturity of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments
such as U.S. Treasuries, and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a summary of the performance of the District's
portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period October 1 through
December 31, 1998.
Portfolio Performance Surnmary
Quarter Ended December 31,less
Liquid Operatmg Monies(%) LOWTerm Operating Monies(%)
Total Rate of Return
3 Months 1.3 0.6
6 Months 2.8 4.5
9 Months 14.2 5.4
12 Months 1 5.8 8.1
Since inception 30 Sept.95 I b.0 1.3
Benchmark
3 Months 1.1 0.5
6 Months 24 4.3
9 Months 6.0
12 Months 5.1 76
Some inception 30 Sept.95 5.2 69
Market Value per PIMCO 31 Dec.98 $1 SAM 3304.SM
Average Quality *AAA' 'AM'
Current Yield 5.3% 60%
Estimated Yield to Maturity 50% 507%
Ouarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) $20 OM
Estimated Annual lrcome $1.DM $154M
Market Recap
During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Federal Reserve cut short-term interest
rates by 50 basis points, amid concerns of slower growth in the U.S. economy.
The rate cut stabilized the market, restoring liquidity and confidence, and
investors shifted from Treasuries to other bond market sectors, and to stocks,
which surged to record levels.
\YaCmWvu1Mq m vn111V neTAHRTahgs9FebVAHRW-05 trc
R. 1 v Page 2
As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve," the
Treasury yield curve remained flat during the fourth quarter, but short and
intermediate rates rose by approximately 10 to 30 basis points as expectations
faded for further rate cuts by the Fed. The benchmark 30-year Treasury rate
rose approximately 10 basis points when compared to the end of the third quarter
1998 (4.97% vs. 5.09%).
For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted
maturity or duration, slightly above the duration index (2.4 vs. 2.3 years),
emphasizing holdings in lower coupon mortgage backed securities, and high
quality corporates. These investments contributed incremental yield to the
portfolio when compared to the all-Treasury benchmark yields, despite market
volatility. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark(0.6% vs. 0.5%) for the fourth
quarter, and for the year (8.1% vs. 7.6%).
For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO used a duration posture
slightly below index(approximately 72 days vs. 90 days), and emphasized U.S.
Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate commercial paper in the
portfolio. These investments added incremental yield to the portfolio, as interest
rates rose slightly. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark (1.3% vs.1.1%)for
the fourth quarter, and for the year (5.6% vs. 5.1%).
Portfolio Market Values
During the month of December, the District received approximately $33.5 million
through the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. The
sum of$20 million was deposited to the District's Long-Term portfolio for
investment, and the balance of$13.5 million was deposited in LAIF to be
available to meet current and projected cash flow requirements.
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the
table below, and in the attached bar chart.
Longat
Llg Operating
Gunder Operating Monks
Ending Monies(fM) ($M)
31 Dec.97 17.6 301.1
31 Mere 98 17.8 306.0
w Junem 18.1 311.5
30 Sept.98 16A 282.6
31 Dec.98 18.6 3045
1VaGm W IetY.y.EMdnl1 PcnneFAHMFa W 1FeNFAHRBBeS.dec
se Page 3
n
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Three Comparative Bar Charts
4. Historical Yield Curve Graph
SKIc
w.ae.wmtey.amm.vtmnn�aHmranomr.mraHama a:
aw;zsa: ,r,.sa Page 4
A
Prepared by Finance, 212/99, 7:32 AM
OCSD Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$350,000,000
$300,000,000 ��� ♦.. iii ���
$250,000,000
$200,000,000 iii iii - iii
iii
iii
j $150,000,000
♦�� iii > iii iii P'0 t ♦��
I
iii ... ... +, a ..♦
$100,000.000 ♦.♦ ... ... ... �u
♦.♦ ; iii ... ... ,,,���F P iii
j $50,000,000
iii
31 Dec 97 31 Mar 98 30 Jun 98 30 Sep 98 31 Dec 98
❑ Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\i nvestmg mtprogram
Prepared by Finance, 2/1/99, 11:39 AM
OCSD Liquid
110perating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification ,00,00
100 - - -- - _..
80
70
60
.. ❑ 9/30/98
(D 50 , 012/31/98
aa) 40
a
30 -
20 —
10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:lexcel.dtaVin\222OVeggllFlnancetPortfollo short term
Prepared by Finance, 2/1/99, 1:26 PM
r
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification
100 --
90
80
60 El9/30/98
.r 012/31/98
50
U
a�
40
d 30 29
20 16
i
10
0 0 0 0 0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio long tern graph
Prepared by Finance, 211199, 2:19 PM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
6.00
6.76 L— — —
5.50 — — -- ------ -- -
5.25 — -- -- -- -- - _.-...... -- — —
9 5.00
4.76
i
4.60
I
I
4.25 - - -- --
r--
i
4.00 - ,---�- -- --
E °E
a «r a a n o
M � �
-�30-Jun-98 —d-3"ep-98 t31-Dec-98
G:lexcel.dla\fiM2220lgeggilFinanceW istoricalTREASURYyieldcurve
FAHR COMMMEE ""`Ing T°x e S
02/10
1
93 02/29/99
AGENDA REPORT 1°""u u0m)cn
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE
FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 1999 TO MARCH 1, 2000
(FAHR99-06)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Renew boiler & machinery insurance for the District for the period March 1, 1999
to February 29, 2000, with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, in an
amount not to exceed $71,286.
SUMMARY
Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, has completed their
survey of the current bailer& machinery insurance market, and recommends that
the District renew boiler& machinery insurance coverage with Hartford Steam
Boiler Insurance Company for 1999-00.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
11nJenllhlMy.CbNn,t'1°cnneFAHR1FeM1RPFeMFANRPoN.Lx
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District's boiler and machinery insurance program provides coverage ($100
million per occurrence/$100,000 deductible) for losses caused by covered
machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, co-gen engines).
Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and
improvements caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the boiler&
machinery insurance. This program augments the District's all-risk property
insurance which covers perils such as fire, flood, and earthquake.
To analyze available coverage levels and premium costs, Driver marketed the
District's boiler & machinery insurance requirements to four insurance carriers.
After reviewing the renewal proposals, Driver entered into negotiations with
Hartford, the District's current boiler & machinery insurance underwriter, and
secured policy renewal with no increase in premium cost (see attached letter).
Hartford Insurance Companies, with more than $1 billion in reserves, is rated
'A4'/FSC X (Superior) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating
agency), for its overall ability to meet its obligations to policyholders.
Hartford remains one of the few insurance companies to offer boiler& machinery
insurance with high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the
District, and they offer the most competitive pricing for the 1999-00 renewal
period. Staff concurs with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient
funds are contained in the current budget to cover premium costs ($71,286).
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Broker of Record Letter
SK:Ic
„��.+w mu.�unverr,wmcamw.rwv.waee.ae eon
R.^..4 ,� Page 2
• ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES a Division of Robert F.Driver Co.,Inc
Founded on knowledge, integrity and service.
ASSOCIATES
February 1, 1999
Mr. Steve Kozak
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
RE: Boiler&Machinery Insurance
Dear Steve,
Confirming our recent discussions, we have now negotiated renewal terms and conditions with
Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, the Districts' current insurer at a $71,206 (same as
expiring)annual premium.
We did approach several insurers in this relatively small specialty insurance marketplace -
Travelers, Chubb and CNA - but these carriers have not been able to offer more competitive
pricing. Furthermore, Hartford's experience in servicing large and complex operations (such as
the co-generation facility, which many companies do not wish to insure) is an asset in the
Districts' management of risk.
We recommend your authorizing us to implement coverage.
Sincerely,
ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOCIATES
Wald H. McL
First Vice Presi
Newport Beach
4041 MacArthur Blvd,#300, P.O.Box 6450,Newport Beach, California 92658-6450 • (949)756-0271•Fax(949)756-2713
IIc,N0C36861 • www.rfdrivercom
San Diego Escondido Sacmmento Fresno
FAHR COMMITTEE Meetio9Drto Tosa.ofDo .
2/30/99 2/24/99
AGENDA REPORT ICm Numo Ite E
13ul /� 45
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE DISTRICT'S
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(FAHR99-07)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to retain Moreland & Associates to conduct the independent audit of the
District's annual financial statements for an additional year(1998-99), and to issue
Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed
$42,600. Proposals for five-year audit services will be solicited during 1999-2000.
SUMMARY
In February 1995, after a competitive selection process, Moreland &Associates were
awarded the contract to audit the District's annual financial reports over the next four
years through the year ended June 30, 1998. The audit fee for the first year of the
contract was for $38,000 with a four-percent escalator each year over the next three
years of the agreement through June 30, 1998. At that time, Moreland & Associates
were not only deemed to be the most qualified firm, but were also the low bidder.
Although the contract has expired, Moreland & Associates have agreed to extend their
services for an additional year. They propose to perform the audit for the year ended
June 30, 1999 at the same rate that was charged for the last year of their contract,
$42,600.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Total all-inclusive maximum cost to audit the District's financial statements for the three
year ending June 30, 1999 is $42,600.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
(This item is not applicable to the current years Joint Operating Budget, but is to
be budgeted next year.)
N Ny.C10+OmEtlFAHfl1FVA9TFe�1PhlfAMFglI)e E¢
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Finance Department is implementing organizational changes this year and over the
next couple of years, and this agency would benefit from the continuity of having
Moreland & Associates continue to perform the annual financial audit. Since Moreland
& Associates is already familiar with the Finance Department policies, procedures, and
systems, less District staff time would be devoted to getting a new firm up to speed.
Included within the aforementioned organizational changes that are currently underway
within the Finance Department are:
• The completion of the financial information system implementation through the year
1999-00.
• The completion of the Finance Department Operational Audit and implementation of
the subsequent recommendations.
• The development of a Finance Department comprehensive policy and procedure
manual for the benefit of the department's customers and staff.
• Development of a Y2K test plan and setting up a test environment for the financial
information system.
ALTERNATIVES
Open the selection process and solicit bids from other certified public accounting firms.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
None,
MW
R JRa 4ge Wu Wahaar.e� WRw 7&a:
Ra..w. d,om Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE Meedng Date To BO.of pr.
1/10/" ry34/99
AGENDA REPORT Iem 13(b) /f mL41�M
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO MAKE AN EQUITY ADJUSTMENT
(FAHR99-08)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to give Danny Evangelista an 11.7% equity adjustment to correct
the internal and external inequities that exist between Mr. Evangelista's salary
and the salaries of other Programmers.
SUMMARY
Danny Evangelista has been an employee with the Orange County Sanitation
District for ten years. For the past three years, Mr. Evangelista has been a
Financial Analyst and has spent the last eighteen months working with the
J. D. Edwards (JDE) Financial Information System (FIS). Mr. Evangelista was
selected to fill an open Programmer position in the Information Technology
Department on January 4, 1999. The responsibilities of the position include
performing a wide variety of programming activities to support the FIS-hosted
hardware and software database needs of the District. The position is critical in
that it will allow the Information Technology Department to provide much needed
support for the FIS, particularly during the implementation of OneWorld, the
upgraded WorldVision FIS package. Mr. Evangelista's experience as a financial
analyst and knowledge of the JDE Financial Information System make him a
valuable asset to the Information Technology Department as well as to the
District. Mr. Evangelista is the last remaining JDE expert at the District.
Mr. Evangelista was offered, and has since accepted, the Programmer position.
Mr. Evangelista was given a 5.5% promotional increase, in accordance with
Human Resources Policies and Procedures Number C10.00, Section 5.1.3,
which states that "Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional
increase of 5.5%, or to the base of the new pay range, whichever is greater. . ."
The 5.5% promotional increase was not enough; however, to bring
Mr. Evangelista's salary up to market level. An inequity exists between his salary
and the salaries of other District Programmers as well as Programmers in the
external market. An additional increase is needed to bring Mr. Evangelista's
salary closer market.
�do" a" l dec nVIMMIOTAHRTah9 ebTRHR6PC dw
R—" eaoree Page 1
The midpoint of the District's Programmer pay range ($50,304 per year)
represents the external market rate for a journey-level Programmer. Five of the
six District Programmers are at or above the midpoint of the Programmer pay
range. If we were to hire an external candidate to fill the position, we would offer
no less than market or the midpoint of the pay range. Mr. Evangelista's salary,
with the 5.5% promotional increase, is $45,036 or 11.7% below midpoint.
It is requested that the Board of Directors authorize Human Resources to make
an 11.7% equity adjustment to Mr. Evangelista's salary to bring his salary to the
midpoint, orjourney-level market rate, for a Programmer. By raising
Mr. Evangelista's salary to market and retaining his skills, the District benefits
from his knowledge and experience and avoids the additional costs associated
with an external recruitment and specialized JDE training.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
Cost: $5,268 per year.
❑ This item has been budgeted.
This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
This item has not been budgeted, but there are sufficient funds.
Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NIA
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
,Vadu,bap I, dWnQ1 PcraneTAHRTah P &WAHRN3 dm
R—. � Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE M ng rare To W.of Dir.
02/10/99 07/29/99
AGENDA REPORT n""maRm 1ein�pW w
13(� if(dJ
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO REVIEW AND FILE THE
MID-YEAR REPORT PREPARED BY STAFF FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 (FAHR99-10)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Committee review, approve and forward the 1998-99
Mid-Year Report to the Board of Directors.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Mid-Year Report for the
period ended December 31, 1998. This report is a consolidation of both the
financial and operational accomplishments of the District at the mid-point of the
1998-99 fiscal year.
Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of
the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program,
individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within
this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan
milestones identified in the 1998-99 Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 44.85 percent or
$20,272,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been
expended. Net costs have decreased 5.08 percent in comparison with the same
period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1998 is$448.71 based on
flows of 45,179 million gallons, or 245 million gallons per day. This is $29, or
6.02 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63.
Capital improvement outlays for the first half of the year were 26.4 percent of
budget, or$19,060,000.
1 W I"ftlnpl0ga TAHWaaRJFeE ha 10 Jrc
ea.,.. 1,5,,, Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
NIA
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. District's Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ended
December 31, 1998.
MW
w.mnw.m+ay wtnviatr.n.vAHRT*hw.t.bwh 10 dw
x,n..d 1rs Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE McWn9 DM To Be.of a,.
2/10/19" 2/29/99
AGENDA REPORT Item NUMW 1/In yum�
Orange County Sanitation District /
FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Originator: Robert Thompson, Plant Automation Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE YEAR 2000 DATE
CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000
Compliance technical assistance to complete embedded systems assessment,
reparation, and testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999.
SUMMARY
This agenda item is being brought to the FAHR committee this month to inform and
seek the approval of the Board of Directors for services critical to the timely execution of
the Year 2000 Date Change project. Several independent efforts have now reached a
point where they may be consolidated into one contract. Staff are now able to more
completely scope and estimate the effort required to test and certify Y2K compliance of
our embedded systems District-wide. Staff is seeking approval of this action, rather
than proceeding on a delegation of authority emergency basis or waiting until the end of
March to begin the work.
The Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement in October 1998
with Bristol Systems to provide project management and technical project oversight.
One aspect of the technical project oversight services was to assist staff in the
development of the procedure to assure Y2K compliance of District embedded systems.
The Operations and Maintenance and Engineering Departments required unique,
detailed inspection services to scope the work effort outlined in the new procedure.
Staff intended to research, correct (if required), and test all embedded systems with
existing District personnel when the October 1998 Board action was taken. However,
due to the resignations of two District electrical engineers and to meet the project
schedule, Bristol Systems was contracted to assist both Operations and Maintenance
and Engineering in the preliminary assessment and prioritization of embedded systems.
These efforts were beyond the original scope of contract work, and thus a not-to-exceed
$50,000 purchase order was cut for each of the two departments. These Purchase
Orders were sole sourced to Bristol Systems via District procedures based on Bristol
Systems familiarity with the plant processes, familiarity with the District's Y2K
embedded systems Y2K procedures, and for expediency.
The efforts to date have systematically organized and analyzed the risk factors for more
than twenty thousand pieces of equipment. The number of pieces of equipment
requiring detailed assessment, possible repair, and testing has been reduced to less
H\vq EOYOe^GVNUN epeMv Repn110i8 BVN vpeMv fleeorbNNTYMGs
Page 1
than one thousand unique pieces of equipment. The systematic reduction has been
done to minimize the effort required without taking unacceptable risk of system failure.
The current need of District Staff is for the assistance of outside electrical engineers to
complete the Year 2000 assessment, testing and repair(if required) of the remaining
identified critical embedded systems.
Additional expert electrical engineering support is required to minimize risk and meet
the project schedule. Critical items, such as pumping system components, must be
tested to assure Y2K compliance. In addition, great care must be taken not only to
ensure compliance, but to assure the testing itself does not risk the public health or
environment. Staffs best estimate is that 1561 hours of service at a not-to-exceed price
of$192,000 will be required to reduce the risk to acceptable levels for embedded
systems identified as critical. Staff recommend the sole source award of this
Professional Services Agreement to Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge
of our plant facilities, thorough understanding of the Y2K embedded systems
compliance procedure, technical capability and schedule constraints. The schedule
constraints of this project are very pressing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached spreadsheet.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Special Projects 2q)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
BACKGROUND
The Board of Director's approved a Professional Services Agreement in October 1998
with Bristol Systems to provide project management and technical project oversight. At
that time, staff intended to research, correct (if required), and test all embedded
systems with District personnel. The project plan called for each Department within the
District to assure Year 2000 (Y2K) compliance of its equipment and systems. An
internal goal was established to complete the assessment phase of the project by
January 31, 1999. This would allow enough time to upgrade, replace, or create
workaround plans for any equipment found to be non-compliant.
Operations and Maintenance was the first Department to begin to assess the embedded
electronics in process equipment. The simplified Y2K compliance procedure for
embedded systems the Operation and Maintenance Department has completed to date
is as follows:
X My Ra�enEaVbaN�penEa Repv4\1yA BwN/.yeNa RepwY'PAdYMdc
R. wl a Page 2
1. The Computerized Maintenance Management System database was used as a
4 starting point.
2. The database was filtered to eliminate all non-electrical or non-electronic items.
3. Staff answered twelve questions about each remaining item to further reduce the list
without increasing the acceptable risk. The questions asked if items were
programmable, or had batteries, or communications ports, etc..
4. Physical inspection of all of the items on the inventory by a team to include a
maintenance technician and an electrical engineer. (Approx. 3400 items)
5. Analysis and compilation of the physical inspection reports.
6. Management Review Workshop with key Operations and Maintenance personnel to
drop noncritical, low risk items. (880 items (400 unique) that require additional
assessment work due to their criticality and/or complexity.)
7. Information on the remaining 880 items is being collected from various sources for
assessment by qualified personnel.
Staff fully intended to conduct this work internally, the staff electrical engineer that
began the effort resigned shortly thereafter. A second staff electrical engineer was then
assigned, and he too resigned. In late November staff determined that outside electrical
engineering assistance would be required to assist Operations and Maintenance in
performing the physical inspection by December 31, 1998. A contract and purchase
order for $49,500 was let to Bristol Systems on December 3, 1998 to provide qualified
Electrical Engineers to expedite the physical inspection of these 3,400 items in step 5.
A new sole source contract and purchase order were issued since this work was not
within the services approved by the Board of Directors in October 1998. This work was
essentially completed in late December 1998, The purchase order was sole sourced to
Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge of our plant facilities, thorough
understanding of the Y2K embedded systems compliance procedure, technical
capability, and schedule constraints.
The Engineering Department began an effort to assess embedded systems for recently
completed projects and projects in construction. The Engineering work process was
different in that it did not have a database of equipment from which to start. The
simplified Y2K compliance procedure for embedded systems the Engineering
Department has completed to date is as follows:
1. An inventory of all electronic items was created by going through plans,
specifications, and project submittals on a per project basis.
2. The same twelve questions about each remaining item were answered to reduce the
list without increasing the acceptable risk.
3. A comprehensive physical assessment was completed. Since there wasn't an
existing database with reliable field verified data, each items was verified for
manufacturer, model number, and the accuracy of the questions responses in step
2.
4. A physical inspection of each project area to ensure all devices installed or modified
by the project were accounted for on the list. Items added by change order, or not
fully documented in the project were missed in step 1.
5. Analysis and compilation of the physical inspection reports.
6. Management Review Workshop with key Operations and Maintenance and
Engineering personnel to drop non-critical, low risk items. (Scheduled for February
11,1999).
X A.p Gb4yMolBVN IgeMe Re 11 M Bu,d IpeMe Repmb'OAPYlKb[
R,,,,,.. ,„ Page 3
The Engineering Department began using internal staff to complete the embedded f
systems assessment. However, in Mid-January 1999. Engineering determined that
additional outside Electrical Engineering assistance would be required to complete this
initial assessment in a timely fashion. A new sole source purchase order and contract
was let with Bristol Systems for$49,500 on January 28, 1999 to assist Engineering in
the completion of the work. A new contract was required because the scope of the
services provided by Bristol Systems was much greater than for Operations and
Maintenance, although it had relatively fewer items. The Engineering Department
required assistance for steps 2 through 6. The Operations and Maintenance
Department required assistance for step 4 only. The sole source award was justified on
the same basis as for Operations and Maintenance.
The Technical Services Department started the embedded system assessment process
with a much smaller and more complete inventory list. However, complex laboratory,
storage, and sampling equipment make up the majority of the list.
At this point, Operations and Maintenance, Engineering and Technical Services are
ready to begin the advanced assessment, reparation (if necessary), and testing phase
of the Y2K embedded system procedure. The scope of the services will be very similar
for all three departments.
RECOMMENDED SERVICES
Staff recommend a sole source Professional Service Agreement be established with
Bristol Systems to provide electrical engineering assistance for embedded systems to
the Operations and Maintenance, Engineering and Technical Services Departments for
the advanced assessment, reparation, and testing aspects of the Year 2000 Date
Change Project. The Operations and Maintenance and Engineering Department items
identified in prior work requiring further assessment study by definition are critical to
keep the wastewater flowing and treated, or are safety related items and carry an
unacceptable risk of failure. The Technical Services Department equipment requiring
further assessment study are required to support permit compliance and day to day
operation of the treatment plants. The advanced assessment phase includes:
• Vendor web site searches for compliance statements/corrections
• Vendor testing information
• Equipment manual search for date functionality
• Review of circuit diagrams for real time clocks
• Contracting vendors by phone and/or letters
• Development of test plans where necessary
Electrical engineering support will also be critical in the safe and effective testing of
critical District systems. Systems such as the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, influent
pumping systems, city water systems, Central Generation Systems, and key pump-
station pumping systems are absolutely essential to maintain the public health and
environment within our service area. Where assessment and/or testing reveal Y21K
related problems, electrical engineering assistance will be useful to correct hardware
and/or software problems.
H1 Gh,,d,l A Apenda Re,aN,1 M8 WAge RepaM1YIAIdYMOs
ReeieM. •,� Page 4
Staff recommend the sole source award of this Professional Services Agreement to
-4 Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge of our plant facilities, thorough
understanding of the Y2K embedded systems compliance procedure, technical
capability and schedule constraints. The schedule constraints of this project are very
pressing.
SCOPE OF WORK
The recommended scope of work includes the following elements:
• Work with District staff to complete an embedded system assessment.
• Assist District staff in producing, executing, and analyzing compliance testing
procedures and testing for computer systems and embedded systems.
• Review documentation provided by Operations-Maintenance on remaining
components. Documentation to be provided by Operations-Maintenance shall
consist of(whenever available) circuit diagrams, data sheets, technical
documentation, maintenance manuals, user manuals, manufacturer web pages,
and third party data. For each such component Operations-Maintenance shall
identify the associated 0&M system. Taking into account the 0&M risk factors
for these systems, make a recommendation for each such component as to
whether the District should test it for a Y2K problem. Assist O&M management in
making decisions on further assessment. Such management shall decide on
components remaining to be tested.
• For components to be tested recommend testing procedures and assist the
District in the preparation of test plans for them. If a third party develops such
plans, then provide an independent review of such plans. This should include
any acceptance testing plans for components yet to be accepted from third party
contractors andlor system integrators.
• Assist the District in the execution and analysis of such tests.
• Assist the District in the development of final assessment documents, including
project plans for reparation, final system testing, and deployment.
• Provide technical support in gathering documentation and data from
manufacturers, maintaining the project schedule, dealing with the details and
paperwork of the process, and other project management duties as the District
may see fit to assign.
• Provide project management expertise and services for the completion of the
Reparation and System Testing phases of the Y2K process.
• Provide test design, development, execution and analysis expertise and services
for both component and system testing in the Assessment, Reparation, and
System Testing phases of the Y2K program.
CONCLUSION
District staff have been systematically analyzing and documenting the Y2K compliance
of our embedded systems. Staff has proceeded with great expediency on this issue.
The District's aim has been to uncover any problems with operating systems as soon as
possible to allow enough time to effectively reduce to acceptable levels, or eliminate
entirely, the risk of system failure.
These services will be required through September 30, 1999 on an as needed basis.
N Fq.!•\ip[Mi16PN/pwd Rept4\1BA Bpitl�peM RapN`DlPdYMGc
Rom.. •,� Page 5
}
ALTERNATIVES
Delay Y2K compliance of embedded systems four to six months and accept increased
risk of system failure.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Spreadsheet
Kws.mspwm�eme fie.a.o�n+000 eo.ro bww nwwmaaraaz
a^ ^^ Page 6
Year 2000 Date Change Project
Cost Summary (through 6130199)
OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION STAFF OUTSIDE MATL TOTALS
1 IPUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS $ 351,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 431,000
Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants;
through the 120"oulfall
2 TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS 468,000 195,000 20,000 683,000
Achieve full compliance with discharge quality
requirements
3 ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE 234,000 54,000 288,000
Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions
of permits issued by RWQCB, EPA, and SCAQMD
4 (MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES I 643,500 66,000 30,000 739,500
„ ,
Bdstrol Systems Inc. (Project Management 8 Assessment to-date) 203,000
Bdstrol Systems Inc. (Project Management now tit end of June) 103,000
Bristrol Systems Inc. (Proposed Advanced Assessment) 192,000
CPG ($50K needs assessment, $100K contingency plans) 150,000
Vantage 8 EQE 60,000
Cooper Cameron 22,000
Miscellaneous Vendor Support(General Electric, ABB, etc.) 95,000
$825,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS, revised 2110/99 $1,250,000 $825,000 $50,000 $2.125,000
Please note that all numbers are estimates based on the best available information. Specifically, the material cost estimate
could change significantly if major hardware issues are uncovered.
Cost Summary Revised Febl O.xls 2116/99
/24i9a
BOARD OF DIRECTORS " Zt2 t To
2/29/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Num1w He Numbe
u rn
Orange County Sanitabon District
FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Originator: Michael D. Moore, ECM (620) Manager
SUBJECT: Wheeler Ridge Option Agreement
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize payment of$10,400 to EK Development Corporation for a second month's
additional payment in connection with the option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kem
County.
SUMMARY
On November 18, 1998, the Board authorized the General Manager to enter into an
exclusive agreement for the option to purchase the Wheeler Ridge site for composting
District's biosolids and to initiate and conduct due diligence research. On
December 28, 1998, the District secured the exclusive rights to the option to purchase
the Wheeler Ridge site. The contract established the option to be $10,400 per month,
which covered the current mortgage, operating expenses, and property taxes. At the
time of contracting, staff estimated that four months would be needed to complete the
due diligence process.
Even though the District did not have a signed agreement until December 28, 1998, the
owner of Wheeler Ridge allowed District staff and consultants on several occasions to
begin our exclusive on-site due diligence efforts in late November and early December.
Information gleaned during this period raised concern over the ability to gain public
acceptance for biosolids composting at this specific location. It was also determined
that the potential for flooding is a concern as evidenced by the recent deposition of large
amounts of soil, as a result of last year's rains. On December 22, 1998, still prior to
entering an option contract, District staff and an environmental firm performed a
preliminary biological site assessment that resulted in numerous concerns about the
potential for using the site as a compost facility.
District's staff believed it had the preliminary approval to begin due diligence research in
early November as a result of our briefing to the OMTS Committee. Relying on the
perceived early approval the owner stopped her efforts to sell the property, effectively
taking the property off the market in reliance on the District's resolution. The delay in
entering the contract was due to the bureaucratic time required in negotiating the
contractual details between staff, our general counsel, and the owner's attorney.
Since the due diligence process took nearly two months to obtain the necessary
information to make a decision, irrespective of when the agreement was signed, staff
recommends that the District compensate the property owner for the second month of
the option agreement.
mw.e
R:My.�MAg Rq %IMB MAgm RpcYNE4Nm 11m.Cs.M
Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
Mp M
NMq EMWO.^E.�N.paN.Regrb\tpJ2 BmN.pxtl.Rgp6'OlpMn 110 C¢Eat
R. ermse Page 2
OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To It W.
2/4/99 2/24/99
AGENDA REPORT ImmN,anber JbmNyobe
99-0O1 7A
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration
SUBJECT: OUTSOURCING OF 175 MILES OF SMALL SEWER LINE CLEANING IN
REVENUE AREA 7, SPECIFICATION NO. M-062
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Sewer Line Cleaning Agreement with Hoffman Southwest Corp. D.b.a. Professional
Pipe Services for the cleaning of approximately 175 miles of small diameter sewer lines in
Revenue Area 7, for Sewer Line Cleaning Specification No. M-062, for an amount not to exceed
$227,115.00 for one-year period with options for two one-year renewal periods.
SUMMARY
Under agreements made some 30 years ago, the District is responsible for maintaining and
cleaning all small wastewater collection lines in Revenue Area 7. This area contains some 200
miles of lines in the 4" to 12" range. -
Last year, staff received guidance from the Board to competitively bid the cleaning of these
lines. In June 1998, we prepared a specification and bid documents. Included in our
specifications was a requirement for the successful bidder to televise 10% of the total lines
cleaned. The lines to be televised, would be selected at random by the District. The purpose
behind this is to insure that the Contractor had cleaned the lines as required by our
specifications. If not, the Contractor would have to re-clean the lines at no cost to the District.
In order to check for the accuracy of our specifications and drawings, staff decided to contract
for the cleaning of a 25-mile area in the City of Irvine, commonly known as the Irvine Business
Complex. Bids were received from a number of firms. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
was the lowest responsive bidder and as a result, received the award. IRWD completed the
work on time and within the budget that we had established. Based on the success and
lessons learned in the Irvine Business Complex, staff prepared a specification (including a
requirement to randomly televise 10% of the lines)to bid out the remaining 175 miles of small
lines in Area 7.
On December 15, 1998, bids were received from 5 firms. The bid prices ranged from a low of
$227,115.00 to a high of$472,770.00. Staff has evaluated the proposals and is recommending
that an award be given to Hoffman Southwest Corp, d.b.a. Professional Pipe Services (Pro
Pipe), which was the lowest responsive bidder, in an amount not to exceed $227,115.00.
Hoffman Southwest Corp. is a contractor with 47 years experience in the maintenance and
inspection of sewer service. They are headquartered in Mission Viejo and have 26 branch
offices in 6 western states. They are a $40.0 million per year company and have done similar
work for the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, City of Norwark, City of Manhattan
Beach, IRWD's Michelson Water Reclamation Plant under contract with CH2M Hill, City of
Burbank, and others.
mdE aWl4p dMWp lmn eMOMTS%FeW—er deenmp ageeea 11�010e Cmi..ex Pagel
District staff toured their facility and met with their staff to inspect their policies and procedures, ,
equipment and safety record. Staff is satisfied with the results of this inspection and can offer
no reason why they should not be awarded the contract.
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will be available to present a verbal
report should it be required.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The cost of the contract will be $227,115.00 and will take approximately nine months from the
start of the contract to complete the 175 miles of cleaning. Staff anticipates that the project will
begin in April 1999.
Additionally, the contract will repeat on an eighteen-month cycle. Contract is valid for one year
with options for two one-year renewal periods.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Trunk Maintenance, Section 4, page 9)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
1. Award to another bidder
2. Not award the contact
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Bid tabulation
EEH: tw
mamn Iu dWVe IMMdp• Ws ss x.wasmoNem Re arras umeex Paget
Y
xv
I
January 21, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Edwin E. Hodges
Director of General Services Administration
FROM: Marc D. Dubois
Contracts/Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Sewer Line Cleaning
Specification No. M-062
Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, December 15, 1998, for providing Sewer Line Cleaning,
Specification No. M-062, for a one-year period beginning April 1, 1999. The table below details the bid
tabulation.
Unit Rate 4" Una Rate S" Unit Rate 8" Unit Rate 10" Unit Rate 12"
COMPANY Dia.Pipe per Dia.Pipe par Dia.Pipe Per Dia Pipe par Dia Pipe per Total
LIP OF LIF 11F OF
Hoffman Southwest Corporation
$0.245 $0.245 $0.245 $0.245 80.20.5 E227,115.00
dba Professional Pipe Services
California Pipeline Inspection,Inc. $0.254 $0.254 $0.254 30.254 $0.254 $235,458.00
Empire Pipe Cleaning S Equip.Inc. $0.295 $0.295 $0.295 SO.345 $0.445 S280,315.00
San Con Engineering.Inc. $0.42 WAS $0.44 $0.45 $0.46 5408,877.50
National Plant Services,Ina $0.51 SO.51 $0.51 $0.51 $0.51 $472,770.00
After site review of contractor's equipment and detailed review of bid documents, staff recommends the
award of a contract to the Hoffman Southwest Corporation,dba Professional Pipe Services, the bidder
with the lowest annual cost of$227,115.00, for providing sewer line cleaning with 10% CCTV, per the
unit price shown above, for a one year period beginning April 1, 1999.
ar D. Du ois
C cktra /Purchasin Manager
Ni Arhontes
Manager, Collection Facilities Operations and Maintenance
(�Ok)
Str d
Director of FI ance
H.A"MTAtrI=MS1MM062rASMEM0
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeltlR9 Dae To 2TiII9 r.
z-zaev
AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Iem yymEc
1
Orange County Sanitation Distract
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEE FOR PROPOSED
GOLDEN OAKS SENIOR COMMUNITY, A LOW INCOME
APARTMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PLACENTIA
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Receive and file letter submitted by Secured Property Management dated
February 15, 1999; (2) Receive and file memo from General Counsel dated February 12,
1999; and (3) Consideration of request by Secured Property Management
to waive or reduce the residential capital facilities connection fees.
SUMMARY
Secured Property Management has requested a waiver or modification of OCSD capital
facilities connection charges for their proposed Golden Oaks Senior Community at
1111 Golden Avenue, Placentia, California.
See attached letter dated February 15, 1999.
The proposed residential development consists of 16 one and two bedroom apartment
rental units that are to be designated as low-income senior housing. The current ordinance,
adopted by the Board of Directors, does not differentiate between a senior rental
development and other residential developments. Furthermore, the ordinance contains no
authority to administratively waive or change the fee that is established by the ordinance.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
A total capital facilities connection charge of $35,872 would be payable to the District under
the current ordinance. This is based on a per unit basis; 16 dwelling units x $2,360 per
dwelling unit, minus five percent (5%) retained by the City of Placentia for processing and
administration per our agreement with the City.
RM EbYpKGVWyN�Re{w6"MB d ApMgr R!%Nb$i4e LmIJ dot
Rwned. vmee Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not applicable. '
ALTERNATIVES
1) The Board of Directors can deny the request by Secured Property Management to waive
or reduce the residential capital facilities connection fees.
2) The Board of Directors can enact an amendment to the ordinance after notice and
hearing, specifying the exact amount and the reasons for a reduced fee, as determined
to be appropriate.
CECIA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Secured Property Management dated February 15, 1999.
2. Memorandum from General Counsel to David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, dated
February 12, 1999.
DAL:RJR:jak:jo:gc
HA .dtaWgenda\Soard Agenda Repods11999 Board!Agenda ReportsZ299Vtem 13.Eot
H:My.Gd ,Wa�Ml nda R*Wa IW2P N 1yeMa flepvMN]9Plbm 13
R-i armee Page 2
y
Secured Property management
02/15/99
David Ludwin
County Sanitation Districts
Of Orange California
10844 Ellis Ave.
Fountain Valley, Ca.
Ref:
Golden Oaks Senior Community
1111 Golden Ave. Placentia Ca.
Dear David,
Thank you for taking time to discuss my questions and concerns about the sewer
connection fees on our Senior Citizens apartment project. As you know this is a low
income Senior Citizen apartment design to assist the elderly. As per the Federal housing
and home finance section 1 of Stats. 1986 "The Legislature finds and declares that
housing which is affordable, decent, safe and sanitary is not available in adequate supply
for elderly citizens. The elderly population in California has experienced dramatic growth
during the past 15 years and is projected to increase by 38 percent by the year 2000."
"The Legislature finds and declares that large numbers of elderly households have low
incomes as evidenced by the fact that the median income of elderly households is 53
percent of the median income of all households in the state.Many elderly renters also pay
excessive amounts of their income for housing. Over one-quarter of California's elderly
households pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing."
Due to the nature of the Senior's limited income and our desire to keep the units
affordably priced to meet their needs we submit for a waiver or modification of sewer
fees to make the housing units economically feasible.
1975 N. BATAVIA STREET•ORANGE.CA 92865 •PH: (714)998-3790• FAX(714)282-0835
`1
Secured Property Management
As per the Government Code Chapter 4.3 Section 65915 " When a developer of housing
proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of the local government, the city,
county, or city and county shall provide the developer incentives for the production of
lower income housing units". "The city, county, or city and county shall establish
procedures for waiving or modifying development and zoning standards which would
otherwise inhibit the utilization of the density bonus on specific sites. These procedures
shall include, but not be limited to, such items as minimum lot size, side yard setbacks,
and placement of public works improvements."
The city of Placentia has allowed the development a density bonus and reimbursement of
all city fees to assist the development of this Seniors project. We submit to the board that
the project is a valuable low income Seniors project that meets all Federal and State
qualifications to qualify the Development to ask for further assistance in either a waiver
of the Sanitation fees or at least a reduction in the county rates.
Thank you for your con sid�tion and concerns of our expanding Senior's needs.
4OaksSe
Goldommunity
1975 N. BATAVIA STREET • ORANGE, CA 92865 • PH. (714) 998-3790• FAX (714) 282-0835
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dace ToB of Dir.
3-24gg
AGENDA REPORT IteM NuMber Iem1umbe
a
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 3-35R (REBID), AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR
SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R
(REBID).
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of
Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor
Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation; (3) Reject all bids; and (4) Authorize the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole
Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid).
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for this project, Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk
Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole
Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R, were bid on February 10, 1999. Three bids were
received ranging from a high of$10,922,111 to the low bid of$7,497,199 submitted by
Barnard Construction Company. The engineer's estimate for both Contracts together
was $6,750,000.
After opening the bids on February 10, 1999, staff questioned the apparent low bidder,
Barnard Construction Company, regarding the appearance of a mistake in their bid
tabulation. This resulted in the discovery of a difference between the linear footage of
one of the repair methods as shown in the schedule of prices compared to the same
item of work as shown on the plans. Staff intends to correct this apparent discrepancy
and readvertise the project.
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file the bid tabulation, reject
all bids, and authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and
Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R.
(The tentative bid date is April 6, 1999).
H N.p.d MpenECW NMa Rgc 11MB dAgi Rey,b`03Wlbm 14
RaN saaae Page 1
J
f
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table. The construction budget for
Contract No. 3-35R is $6.5 million. The construction budget for
Contract No. 3-11 R is $250,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (1998-99 Budget capital Projects zone 3, line d)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
Award contract to the apparent low bidder, Barnard Construction Company for
$7,497,199.
CEOA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The
final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was fled
on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-11 R
Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-35R
RLC:jo
HAwp.dla%agendWBoard Agenda Reportatl999 Board Agenda Repods`D299Vtedn 14.dm
M Mftlapenaae,uC agenda Fe{onsNIM ewN yeW Reeomnxgwum 1e aw
R.a..a aaae Page 2
February 10, 1999
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 1
BID TABULATION
REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R (REBID),
AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION,
CONTRACT NO. 3-11R (REBID).
Engineer's Estimate: $6,750,000 Construction Contract Budget: $6,750.000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. BARNARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. $ 7,497,199.00
2. SANCON ENGINEERING B, INC. $ 9,976,119.25
3. COUCH &SONS $ -10,922,111.00 -
4. $
5. $
6. $
7. $
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above pmjecL Due to a discrepancy in the
District bid documents, I recommend rejecting all bids.
(J;"-;( -
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
'Corrected amount— original bid amount was for$10.922,144.
H:W P.dtalen9UOBS&CONTRACTSI135R1435R Rebid Tab.doo
Revoed 05/19198
OCSD . P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain vallev.CA 92728.8127 . (714) 962-2411
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer
Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS OSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECWTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIONTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST :A:UTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 100%
Design Staff $ 330.500 $ 330,500 $ 330,500 $ 330.500 $ 211,250 64%
Consultant PSA $ 344.000 $ 344.000 $ 344.000 $ 5,720 1 $ 338.280 98%
VConstruction
tract $ 6.500.000 $ 6,500,000 0%
er $ 6,500 $ 6,500 0%
ff $ 402,000 $ 402,000 0%
712,400 $ 712,400 $ 0%
$ 8,327,400 $ 8,327,400 $ $ 705.500 1 $ - Is 368.220 $ 581,530 158%
H,\wp,c11e ipbs&mntmch;U-35R1135R budgetbi 022499
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation
Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 100%
Design Staff $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 34,350 39%
Consultant PSA $ 37,000 $ 37000 $ 37,000 $ 37000 Is 34,150 93%
Construction Contract $ 250.000 S 250,000 0%
Construction Other $ 500 $ 500 0%
Construction Stall $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 0%
Contingency $ 68,200 $ 68,200 $ 0%
TOTAL $ 496.200 1 $ 496,200 $ $ 131,500 1 $ - $ 131.500 $ 75,500 57%
H lwp.dta`angyobs$conlraclsX3-3SR%3-11 R buoge1b1022499
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS weeore oae T°2/ ads.2Ra/g9
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Iem Numbe
• is
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
SUBJECT: INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (THE TREATMENT AND
MANAGEMENT OF SLUDGE OF INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve one week of staff time for out-of-country travel for Jane Tran.
SUMMARY
Jane Tran, Source Control Project Specialist, has prepared a technical paper that has been
accepted for presentation at the March 1999 TEPA-US EPA Bilateral Cooperation Programs
"International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology (The Treatment
and Management of Sludge of Industrial District)" in Taiwan, and is requesting that the District
authorize her attendance at the conference. All expenses will be paid by the U.S. EPA.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff time only. All expenses paid by EPA.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Ms. Tran has been invited by EPA to make a presentation at the "International Forum
on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology (The Treatment and
Management of Sludge of Industrial District) in Taiwan in March 1999. She has been
selected as one of three speakers because of her reputation and expertise in the
industrial wastewater treatment field. She will present a technical paper regarding
pretreatment control and management, and resource recovery technologies.
H:%w .Eta\ta135901vmvAncrAgenaaTaf n2. ° Page 1
r
This conference is part of the partnership between the U.S. EPA and Taiwan EPA and
provides opportunities for professionals from the U.S. to share their wastewater
technical knowledge with their colleagues. All expenses will be paid by EPA. Ms. Tran
will be using 40 hours of regular time to attend this conference.
ALTERNATIVES
The alternative is for the District not to approve Jane Tran's attendance at the conference.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Joint Boards:
1. Copy of workshop agenda
2. Invitation Letter Verifying Payment of Expenses by EPA
MT:Ivw
H:\wp.dWaVS359Nvm ndWA endaTaK"n2.dm Page
w
Q\TEMP\POTW.WPD
DRAFTAGENDA
1999 TEPA- US EPA Bilateral Cooperation Programs
International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and
Management Technology
(The Treatment and Management of Sludge of Industrial District)
Objectives:
Exchange the treatment technology and management of sludge of industrial district
between TEPA-USEPA to enhance their processing strategy,policy, regulation
pretreatment and operation of sludge.
Specific Topics to be Addressed:
—Pre-Treatment Control and Management
—Sludge Generation from Wastewater Treatment Plants of POTW and Sludge
Treatment Technologies
—Resource Recovery Technologies[waste-to-energy]
Dates and Location:
The workshop will take place in Taipei on March 25 and 26, 1999. One or two day
facility visiting will precede the workshop. By virtue of two facilities visiting, US
delegates and local experts exchange experiences to enhance the treatment technologies.
Agenda:
The 1999 bilateral program includes two major activities
-- one or two days field trip will be on March 23 or 24. [Tues and Wed.]
--workshop for the sludge in the industrial district will be held on
March 25 and 26[Thursday And Friday]
Besides a two-day workshop held in Taipei, a one or two days field trip will be
preceded by it.All the US delegates are expected to participate this field trip
traveling to the local industries. Consequently,recommendations and
suggestions from US experts can be provided to local industries during the field
trip.
The two-day workshop includes three experts from US that will be paired with
the local experts. After each presentation by US delegations,a local expert
will make a brief summary about the speech in Mandarin. In the meantime,
synchronous translation will be provided in the speech.
Participants:
The participants for the workshop will include US delegates,operators from
wastewater treatment plants, engineers from consulting firms,and
representatives from government agencies. The primary participants are operators of
wastewater treatment plants,professors from University and experts from Authorities.
It estimated around 120 audiences involved in the workshop.
Tuesday March 23, 1999
Site Visit
Wednesday,March 24, 1999
Site Visit
02/17/99 16 02 FAX 206 553 0149 ES AFFAIRS REG d V001/002
6 Y UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
p �Ft' REGION 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
February 17, 1999
Ms. Jane Trm
Project Specialist
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 9127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Ms. Tran:
I would like to invite you to travel to Taipei, Taiwan to participate as a speaker at an EPA
sponsored workshop titled an "International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management
Technology" from March 20 to 27, 1999.
As a member of the team, all eligible expenses (airfare,taxis,reasonable telephone, meals and
hotel costs) during your stay will be paid. You have been sent EPA Region 10 guidelines which
provides more detailed information on making arrangements and expenses. Enclosed you will
find a travel voucher. This travel voucher should be submitted 5-7 days after the completion
of your trip and be sent to Barbara Legas,EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, OMP-146,
Seattle,WA 98109. Any questions you may have with respect to travel and expenses should be
directed to Paul Steele at (206) 553-0311. To expedite processing your travel voucher, please
send a deposit slip prior to your travel to Paul Steele,EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, OMP-
146, Seattle, WA 99109.
Upon completion of the trip,you will be asked to complete a brief trip report. The report must
be completed within 15 days of your return.
If you have any questions regarding this workshop, please contact Lee Otis or Ann Lesperance ,
EPA Region 10 International program managers at(206) 553-1745.
We look forward to your participation in this workshop with our Taiwanese colleagues.
c ly,
e Otis 0V 10M FOAM n-p1
I temational Program Manager FAX TRANSMITTAL II •=�^wa.L.�
T. QrtC ^✓Q Fri t� lJ„S
CC: Paul Steele o..„• n o _ I ,�
Barbara Legas
Yu-Ting Liu "'• -C( ;I ��59 `°" —55 —Ol•1
ct
o
enclosure: travel voucher Hsr+,sm-ors„-,we swe-�o� usaaur sources•nMi�ly',MTiOX
Avnnmemaxyuneo.�
M &YEAR FINANCIAL
nRF. RATIONAL REPORT
;r
}
r�
4`I ! 1� Nay SP N1I4!
q
q ti � Os
YYT T i
IIIE
For the period ended
December 31 , 1998
Orange County Sanitation District, California
Table of Contents
Section1 - Overview........................................................................................................1
r Financial Report-
Section 2 -Joint Operating 8 Working Capital Budget Review
r
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge...........................................................2
Comparison of Expenses by Department...................................................................3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category................................................................A
Summary of Revenue by Line Item............................................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6
Comparison of Expenses Incurred by C carter by Una Rem.......................................8
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process.........................................................10
Chart of Staffing Trends ...........................................................................................11
Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Fund Review
Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirement- Current Year ...........2
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirement - Project Life..............8
Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Areas
Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas........................................................1
Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2
Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3
Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review.........................................................................A
Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5
Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6
r Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7
Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8
Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9
Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10
Section 5 - Self Insurance Funds Budget Reviews
r
General Liability Fund Budget Review.......................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Budget Review...................................................................2
r
Operational Report
Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1
r
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Li
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank. L
L
L
u
L
L
L
L
L
L
Overview
Mid-Year Financial & Operational Report
December 31, 1998
The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1998-99 mid-year comprehensive
financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational
accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the
general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District,
reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis
on the status of each Division's 1998-99 performance objectives as established in the
1998-99 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is
provided below.
-� Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review. At December 31, 1998, 44.85
percent, or$20,272,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has
been expended. This is a net decrease in costs of 5.08 percent, or $1,085,000 from
the same period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1998 is $448.71 based on Flows of
45,179.19 million gallons, or 245 mgd. This is $29, or 6.02 percent below the budgeted
cost per million gallons of$485.63 while flows are only 2.92 percent lower than
budgeted.
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 1998 include:
• Salaries and Wages - Joint Operating Personnel Cost were at 52.68 percent of
budget through mid-year while staffing was 33.75 full time equivalents (FTE's), or
6.2 percent below the total 549 FTE's approved in the 1998-99 budget. Personnel
costs were high in the first half of the year due to (1)the distribution of annual
bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2)the early
retirement and associated accrual payoff for 14 employees, and (3) annual leave
payoffs are distributed in the first half. Cost savings associated with these early
retirements will be realized in 1999-00, and thereafter.
• Memberships—At mid-year, Membership expense totaled $95,203, or 68.29
r percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a majority of the District's
membership are renewed in the first half of the year.
r • Office Expense— Supplies—The mid-year expenses for Office Expense —Supplies
are at $94,172 or 70.91 percent of budget as a result of the need for new letterhead,
envelopes, and business cards due to the consolidation of the District and
associated change in the District's name.
Section 1 - Page 1
1998-99 Mid-Year Report U
L
• Notices&Ads-At mid-year, expenses for Notices & Ads was at 85.82 percent or j
$11,671 of the 1998-99 budget of$13,600 due to the unexpected executive search L
for two Executive Management positions.
i �
• Training -Mid-year 1998-99 expenses of$97,800 are low at 11.64 percent of a+
budget. During the first half of the year, the training program has gone through
restructuring and planning for FY 1998-99. Staff has scheduled several centralized
li
training classes and expenses will increase in the second half of 1998-99.
• Gasoline, Diesel & Oil- Expenses were high at $118,000, or 57.91 percent in the vi
first half of 1998-99, due to the timing of when purchases are made. Maintenance
buys grease and oil in bulk, which staff believes will last five to eight months.
r
• Contractual Services-Other - Most of the projects relating to other contractual
services are in progress and planning stages at December 31, 1998. With expenses
of$349,000 at only 19.2 percent of the budget, staff expects costs to significantly LJ
increase in the second half of FY 1998-99.
I ;
• Professional Services-Audit & Accounting - Mid-year expenses of$46,765 are at u
109.8 percent due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs
during the first and second quarters of each year and the final payment on the L
sewer connection fee audit.
• Professional Services - Other-Mid-year expenses of$277,000 are only at 25.2 L
percent. Most projects are only in process or in the planning stages at December
31, 1998. Staff expects costs to significantly increase in the second half of FY
1998-99. -
• Research & Monitoring- Mid-year expenses of$796,000 are only at 34.7 percent of
the $2,293,000 budget. Biosolids and strategic process studies were in the planning
stages during the first half of FY 1998-99 and are currently in process. Expenses
for these line items will be incurred during the third and fourth quarters. W
• Service Maintenance Agreements - Expenses of$337,000, or 28.7 percent of the
budgeted $1,177,000 are low due to the timing on when these agreements are `
renewed. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end.
i
• Telephone-At mid-year telephone expenses totaled only $99,000, or 35.1 percent r+
of the budget because charges for the new T-1 line will not be incurred until the third
and fourth quarters of 1998-99.
L
L
Section 1 - Page 2
L
Overview
r
• Water—Mid-year water expenses are only at$396,000, or 40.5 percent of budget
r because the expected increase in the price of Green Acres Water has not been
realized. It is anticipated that water expenses at the end of the year will
approximate $850,000, or 87 percent of the 1998-99 budget.
r
• Insurance Premiums — Insurance premiums at mid-year are only$552,000, or 35.8
percent, due to the timing of when the budget is prepared and when insurance
quotes are provided by brokers. The budget was prepared assuming that insurance
premiums would increase. Instead, actual insurance premiums have decreased
,r and will only total $1.2 million, or 82 percent of budget at year-end.
• Other Increases in the Second Quarter over the First—Other than previously
.+ mentioned items, there are two other line items that had noteworthy increases in the
second quarter over the first. Other Waste Disposal increased $209,000 due to the
reclassification of invoices erroneously posted to Solids Removal. Power realized
an increase of$201,000, which is attributed to a typical increase in usage during the
fall and winter months.
• Variances in the Expenses by Treatment Process from the Prior Year—The major
changes in the treatment process expenses from the prior year is primarily due to
the reallocation of staff, and redefining process related expenditures in an effort to
improve the classifications of treatment process costs.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section 1 - Page 3
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report -
Comparison of Mid-Year Cost per Million Gallons Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) - Last Five Years
5501
51a]B —
50U �15
4Bdee
, y� 4esaB
500 . 4d5 rs r
ri. e aea e4
450 —
400
so
9495 9596 9fi-97 91-98 9BA9
2ntl Veer 3ntl Ydar 2ne Veer 2ndat Vedr 2ndQV BMnual
udgM
ao- eye ao- era oo- .w oo- me as 6ue9m r
As highlighted in the graph shown above, the cost per million gallons at mid-year has
been within 3.5 percent of the year-end actual for the past four years. This fluctuation r
is mostly due to the time it takes to complete various operating activities and when they
can actually be recorded within the District's accounting records. ,
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through the mid-year, as budgeted for 1998-99, and as r
actually incurred through mid-year of 1997-98. All three charts are quite similar
showing little change between the prior mid-year actual, current year budget and
current mid-year actual. r
For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional
contributions to the gallonage charge through mid-year for the last five years, Section 2
— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for December 31, 1996,
1997, and 1998, Section 2 - Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major
category through December 31, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 - Page 5 provides a r
summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through December 31, 1998, and
1997, Section 2 — Page 6 and 7 provides a summary of expenses by line item through r
December 31, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 — Page 8 provides a comparison of expenses
r
Section 1 - Page 4 _
r
Overview
incurred by quarter, Section 2 - Page 10 provides a summary of expenses by treatment
process through December 31, 1998, and 1997; and Section 2 - Page 11 provides
staffing trends over the last five years including total authorized, actual staffing
positions filled, and vacant staffing positions.
s
Capital Improvement Program Review:
— sao.000.oao
f70.0N ON
560.000.000
ssa,000.000
W.000.000
5]0.400.OW
S2O.OM.O:W :f
510.0MAN
f0
— 12131198 Actual Projected 1993-99 Originally Estimated
Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 1998-99 Capital
$19,060,000 S51,591,000 Outlay-$72,186,000
At December 31, 1998, total Capital Improvement Program expenditures totaled
$19,060,100, or 26.4 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1998-99, as
depicted by the chart above. Casts are low through mid-year as most projects for
1998-99 are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays and are
expected to be $20.5 million or 28.5 percent below budget by year-end.
Section 3 — Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each District's share of the total amount of the capital outlay
requirements incurred through December 31.
For more detailed information, Section 3 - Page 2 through 7 provides a summary of the
capital improvement construction requirements of each project for the current year and
Section 3 — Page 8 through 13 provides a summary of the construction requirements of
each project over the project life.
Section 1 - Page 5
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
L
Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At December 31, 1998, revenues from all Areas
totaled $65.6 million, or 49.7 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention Lr
revenues, budgeted at$30.8 million, are at 46.7 percent of budget, or$14.4 million,
and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas
budgeted at $73.8 million, are at 45.1 percent of budget, or$33.3 million. Both of these
revenue sources are low because the majority of the property tax apportionment and
user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are
distributed to the District during the second half of the fiscal year. Interest and
Miscellaneous Revenue are at $14.7million, or 71.24 percent of budget due to the
higher than expected rate of return on the District's investment portfolio of 8.1 percent, J
whereas the budget estimated a 6.0 percent rate of return.
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $51.2 million, or 32.57 percent of L
budget at December 31, 1998. District Operating and Other Expenditures, budgeted at
$9.3 million, are only at 32.0 percent of budget, primarily because of the majority of the
line cleaning work to be done is scheduled for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Ll
District Trunk Sewer Construction costs, budgeted at $22.9 million, are only at 29.0
percent of budget, or$6.6 million, due to the award of fewer than expected construction Li
projects. Conversely, COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at$30.4
million, are high at 68.9 percent of budget, or$20.3 million because the majority of the
principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal year. L
Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers'
Compensation, and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund L
accounting Is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses Incurred in managing
these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area
contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid,
claims administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund mid-year revenues totaled $478,000, or 86.1 percent of
L
budget and total expenses were at $734,000, or 81.5 percent of budget. This is high
due to the settlement of the Walcon Construction claim during the second quarter of FY
1998-99. u
operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) L
pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of December 31, 1998.
Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and L
incorporated into the 1998-99 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance
measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured,
achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to L
L
Section 1 - Page 6
L
Overview
further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's
critical goals for 1998-99, workplans were also developed at the divisional level.
At December 31, 1998, 85 percent of the District's performance objectives and, 72
r percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end.
Significant staff resources have been reassigned to ensure the District's smooth
computer transition to the year 2000 and this redeployment may cause some workplan
projects to be deferred until next fiscal year.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section 1 - Page 7
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Li
L
u
b
L
L
I`
L1
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Section 1 -Page 8
I
Lv
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Departmental Gallonage Charges
— For the Six Months EnEeG Deoemher 31 1998
— Engineer.ng O 3 AI
0% 51+y
GSA
— 10%
Finantt
5%
Comm [
Inla TMAll
— Erec Mgmr
2% Toxh Si,. R/R
15% 2%
Oepanmeraal Gallonage Charges
199&g9 Bpoget
— Engineenng
0%
O&M
GSA 55%
—
0%
Fn.
)%
Cornin
1%
1%
Ins Ted,
— 5% .r�„U
Exec,Mgm
3% Tach S. MR
15% 3%
—
DepaMronW Gallonage Charges
— For the Su Mot EnOM DecanOer 31, 1997
Erg.., O 8 M
- 0°4 fi296
GSA
8%
Frerre—
6%
Comm
1%
b
a%Talent
Exec Mgmt
— 2% TMI Svcs Hitt
14% 3%
Section 2—Page 1
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 L
12131194 12/31195 12131/96 12/31197 1908.99 12/31/98
Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual !
Flow in Million Gallons 43,927.97 43,284.61 44.63t.77 45,573.73 9307S.00 45,179.19 �r
General Manager Department 14.M 12M 17.08 11.14 13.72 9.58
Communications 4.30 S." 5.47 6,35 5.22 L
Human Resources Department
Human Resources 10.13 4,12 6.25 4.79 4.43 3.7E
Education &Training 5.00 7.33 7.18 &67 3513
Safety&Emergency Response &92 6.98 3.91 5.17 &31 u
Total 1013 13.04 20.54 15.88 1&27 10A1
Finance Department
Finance Administration 15.01 19.34 17.91 1&45 1&78 14.34 L
Accounting 8.80 10.42 10.80 10.74 10.88 9.89
Purchasing &Warehousing 5.91 7.25 7.03 5.79 6.85 &82
Total 29.72 37.01 36.74 32.98 39.52 30.05
General Services Department L
General Services Administration 12.45 7.28 7.55 443 4.57 4.41
Collection Facilities Maintenance 2.31 6.00 5.27 1.98 295 &36
Plant Facilities Maintenance 34.88 33.43 37.28 38.56 43.85 41.88 L
Total 49.44 45.71 50.08 33.14 61.47 49.65
Information Technology Department
I.T. Administration - - - - 271 1.88 j
User Support - 6A0 5.23 7.53 6.27 3.57 L
Network Support - 18.23 9,35 679 &10 4.79
Programing&Database - - - - 328 2.31
Plant Automation - 4.48 3.21 5.25 3.33 Total 2463 19.06 17.54 25.69 15.66 L
Operations&Maintenance Department
Opns&Maint. Administration 9.40 13.31 14.05 2.38 234 2.12
O&M Scheduling - 4.54 4.49 -
O&M Process Support - - 7.65 7.53 4.18
Plant No. 1 Operations 67.95 75.46 75.31 a$,,88 69.42
Plant No. 2 Operations - 105.93 105.81 105.03 93.45 93.61 LMechanical Maintenance 55.90 46.S4 45.68 48.00 47.61 48.67
Electrical&Instrumentation Mice. 45.25 39.39 43A4 5215 49.99 46.17
Air Quality&Special Projects - - - 7.01 6.00 5.93
Central Generation - 20.45 22.06 22.23 29.73 25.79 I
Plant Operations 149.00 L
Total 260.35 298.21 310.99 32D.36 30413 296.79
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 1.97 6.19 8.09 &21 7.16 7.54 L
Environmental Management 110.28 54.91 39.48 20.07 36.10 28.73
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 35.47 32.74 30.14 3&90 31.07 31.42
Source Control 10.54 5.84 5.05 3.95 3.80 2.67 j
Total 1$8.30 99.68 83,34 72.13 79.03 70.38 V
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 0.32 3.68 1.10 - - 0.01
Planning &Design 1.69 9.35 1.65 0.93 1.00 0.06
Construction Management 2.11 &57 3.43 0.76 0.65 1.96
Total 4.02 16.60 B.08 1.69 1.55 2.02
Total Joint Operating Expenses 525.98 551.52 548.33 520.33 5W.73 400.16 L
Less: Revenues (52.60) (45.82) (37.55) (51.eg) (51.10) (41.45)
Net Joint Operating Expenses 474.38 505.70 510.78 468.64 465.83 448.71
I
I.d
Section 2-Page 2
1
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
1998-99
12131196 12/31/97 Kevised Year to Date Budget
— Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 12131/98 Realized
General Managers Department 781,418 507.748 1,276,850 432,722 33.89%
r Communications 242,797 249,492 590,600 235,787 39.92%
Human Resources Department
Human Resources 278,949 218,214 412,540 188,281 40.79%
Education 8 Training 327,151 327,184 806,600 161,782 20.06%
r Safety 8 Emergency Response 310,637 178,201 481,350 149,492 31.06%
Total 916,737 723,599 1,700.490 479,555 28.20%
Finance Department
r Finance Administration 799.366 749,544 1.748.350 648,068 37.07%
Accounting 482,023 489,549 1,012,750 446,683 44.11%
Purchasing&Warehousing 313,761 263,992 638,940 262,938 41.15%
Total 1,596,139 1,503,085 3.400,040 1,357.689 39.93%
- General Services Department
General Services Administration 336,970 210,792 453,370 199,200 43.94%
Collection Facilities Maintenance 235,209 89,133 274,150 151,703 55.34%
r
Plant Facilities Maintenance 1,662,980 1,666,030 4.063.030 1,892,093 46.57%
Total 2,235,159 1,965,955 4,790,550 2,242,996 46.82%
Information Technology Department
I.T.Administration - - 252,590 84,711 33.54%
r User Support 233,424 343,288 583,800 161,497 27.66%
Network Support 417,307 309,556 753,970 216,203 28.68%
Programing&Database - - 303.390 104,282 34.37%
Plant Automation 199,950 146,329 488,220 160.503 30.83%
Total 850,881 799,173 2,381,970 717,196 30.11%
Operations&Maintenance Department
Opns 8 Maint. Administration 627,D76 108,302 217,375 95,714 44.03%
r O&M Scheduling 200,397 - - - -
O 8 M Process Support - 348,857 700,425 188,785 26.95%
Plant No. 1 Operations 3,367,913 3,432.357 6.225,110 3,136.143 50.38%
Plant No.2 Operations 4,722,488 4,786,539 8,698,190 4,225,629 48.58%
�+ Mechanical Maintenance 2,038,779 2,214,782 4,431,080 2,198,876 49.62%
Electrical S Instrumentation Mtce. 1,938,804 2,376,589 4,652,940 2,086,062 44.83%
Air Quality 8 Special Projects - 319,646 614,030 267,7% 43.60%
Central Generation 984,577 1,013,098 2,766,850 1,210,194 43.74%
r
Total 13,880,034 14,600,170 28,306,000 13,409,111 47.37%
Technical Services Department
.r Technical Services Administration 387,850 374,080 666,800 340,554 51.08%
Environmental Management 1,761,170 1,324,922 3,359,900 1,298,045 30.63%
Environmental Sciences laboratory 1,345,202 1,408,154 2,975,250 1,419,357 47.71%
Source Control 225,390 180,073 354,000 120,718 34.10%
"a Total 3,719,612 3,287,229 7,355,950 3,178,714 43.21%
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 49,095 74 130 418 321.54%
— Planning 8 Design 69,180 42,358 92,920 2,730 2.94%
Construction Management 153,087 34,586 60,600 88,058 145.31%
Total 271,362 77,018 153,650 91,206 59.36%
r Total Joint Operating Expenses 24,472,939 23,713,469 49,956,100 22,144,976 44.33%
Less: Revenues (1,676,027) (2,355,670) (4,756,100) (1,872,625) 39.37%
Net Joint Operating Expenses ,793;4T'F M/7, 4� 4—T.M Or —2TT/7,31PT 44—.F5%-
r
Section 2—Page 3
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Summary of Expenses by Major Category L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
ti
u
Expanse Exlema Ingleoe Increase Percent
gapped TbN 1nN (Oaaraasa) Budget Panalning
Daecri Ft. llM 12/31188 12731191 f % Maall p dgat
u
Fbt Salary,Mhageafl Benefim 23,818$40 11,928,148 12,082,855 (154.]0]) (1.28) 49.87 11,990,092
A4minletr .Expeneoe 711,880 35405 241,883 112,N2 46.72 49.85 357,M5
Printing BPubliratlan 341,700 156,078 1B2,875 (27.817) (15.13) 45.77 186,6]2
Trelning B MsaCngs I.OM.840 197,201 441,707 (244,506) (55.35) 18.36 876,639
Yrl
Operating Exp . 5,379,280 Z4115,307 2,750,945 (335.50) (12.20) 44.90 2,SBa8B3
CanlraMals Ions 7,037,350 2,663,770 2.717,724 (33,854) (t E) WA4 4,353,SB0 V
Profoeeunnl Soril. 1.897,000 567.245 697,891 0W.646) (18.72) 29.90 1,329,755
Masserah B Man Bering 2,282,500 7%,911 978,Ml (182.290) (1664) 34.M 1.49851041 L
lbpalra B Malnnenaneo 3,09.040 1,750,382 2.054,506 (314,124) (15.22) 44.89 2.1MAS
wiluea 3.744,450 1,6P.W9 1,666683 8,606 cu 44.79 2,067,3111 L
Ogler Materiels,supplies,
and Servkee 2,5M.M B08,428 M,M 55.436 651 mm /,881292
coazal«conflotner (2,912.9o9) (12BB.479) (g64,37a) (322.1os) 81.40 44.1e (1,Bz6,42z)
V
Total JoInI Operating Expense Q.M.100 22,144,978 23,713,469 (1,588,483) (6.61) 44.33 27,811,124
MatenuesflOAeata (4,756,100) (1.872,875) (2,355,670) 483.045 (20.51) 39.37 (2M.475)
Mat JOlnt OpereBnp Epp . 45,200,000 202.72,351 21,357,799 (1,085,448) (5.08) 44.85 24,1W.649
Gel bnage Flw(MG) 93,075.w 45,179.19 45,5M.n (395) (0,87)
GaMnage Floar(MG0) 2 w 24554 247.68 (2) (0.86) L
Galbnape Flow(f's MG) 465.83 44a.71 488.84 (20) (425)
L
L
L
L
L
Section 2—Page 4
i
Yr
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
r
Re.anue Revenue Mvarrue Increase Increase
r Budget Tlru Thru the Inning thru (Decrease) (Dmwea9e)
Deaeiption 199a89 12MM 12=911 Budget 1213997 $ %
r Inter District Sewer Use 2,175,000 542,447 24.94 1,632,553 1,2D9,541 (667,094) (55.2)
Wastehaukr 400,000 219,246 54.81 180,754 178,955 40,291 22.5
Sludge Disposal 900,000 345,997 38.43 564,103 525,519 (179,622) (34.2)
Scrap Sales 20,0D0 - 20,0D0 _ _ _
Other Sales 5,0W 7,189 143.78 (2,189) 3,188 4,001 126.5
Rents&Leases 100.000 96.068 95.07 4,932 76,451 18,617 24.4
General Non-Operating 50,000 26,382 52.76 23,618 (1,494) 27,876 (1,865.9)
Vehide B Equipment 350,000 151,189 43.20 198,811 24,657 126,532 513.2
Sampling Charges 286,100 171,946 60.10 114,154 115.645 55,301 48.7
Power Saks 470,000 313,261 66.65 156,739 223,208 90,053 40.3
r
Total Joint Operating Revenues 4,756.100 1,872,625 39.37 2,853,475 2,355,670 (483.045) (20.5)
r
r
r
r
r
r
ri
r
Section 2-Page 5
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
%
V
Exec. Expense Expanse ht .. Increase
Budget Thm Th. Remaining Thru (Decmase) (13scrosso)
Mecdpmon 1""0 12131UN 12131M Budget IV31197 & %
Seldea,W49as,&Bane6la
Selamm&Wages 31,173,440 16,421,195 6260 14,752245 15=.308 838,887 &36
Employee genets: L
RelimmeM 2.491,900 a84.1m 39.40 1,513,775 1,lldi'I 3 (R.") (726)
Group lnsumnoes 2,758,M0 1,518,014 55.03 1,240,656 1,305,630 212,354 16.27
TUNon Rsimbueemenl 43.723 - (43.723) - 43,783 -
Unitmm Re,tal 60,31D0 29,930 49.64 30,370 28,934 996 3.44 41r1
Mb em Compeimation 219.01DD 109,500 New 109,500 im,180 2320 2.16
UnempbymaM I... 3920D 4,142 10.57 35,058 18,962 (14,820) (78.16)
Total Benefit, 5,575.1O1) 2,689.434 48.24 2,885.6136 2,521,839 167,595 ads
S laAas,Mesa,&Bonofits 36,748,540 19.110.629 5200 17,637,911 18,104,147 1.006,482 5.56
Seldes&Ben.Allot.
Dimc111ndimct AllocCurfiNat (12,830,300) (7.182.481) 55.98 (5,647,819) (6,021.292) (1.161,189) 1926
Bet Saa ,Ms.&Samoa; 23,918240 11,928,148 49.87 11,990.092 12,D82855 (164,T07) (128)
Mad,Supply,&9malcmm
Adminitramae Expenses
Memberships 139,420 95,203 6&29 44217 54,746 40,457 73.90
Olgre Exp-Supplies 132,810 94,172 70.91 36638 76.006 18,166 2&910 I
010m Expeee-Ohm 124,520 4$592 39.02 75.928 42.757 5,835 1&65 L
Small Compulr Items 242250 104,121 4798 136,129 59,494 44.627 75.01
Mimr F.Hure,Fllures,etc. 72,880 12.767 17.52 60,113 ew 3.07 "All
"Ming&Publication j
Repm4M . 246,950 116,436 47.15 130.514 88,123 30,313 3520 IL
PdnmrslCutsida 89,600 22,518 32.35 47,082 72811 (5on3) (0-07)
Notices&Ads 13,600 11.5)1 $5.82 1.929 13,578 (1,907) (14.04)
lohoroPmomaw 11,650 4,d03 38.12 7.147 10,163 (5,760) (5668)
Training&Meetings L
Meetings 234,340 99.445 4240 134895 127,983 (28,538) (2230)
Taiping 839,500 97,758 11.64 741.7" 313,774 (215,968) (8584)
Opemtlng Expotess
Chemical Coagu 1.358.130 587.114 4230 801,016 581AW 6,031 164
SNBde Cool 1,310,430 603,967 am 706,463 704,892 (100,715) (14.29)
Odor CwNol-Tool 1,744,700 704,748 44.95 990.952 1.019,349 (234,601) (23.01)
Chemi ws-Coacm mucm Open. - 2,743 - (2.743) - 2,743 -
Miscala ocus Chemical - Z423 - (2,423) - 2,423 - Illsselll
Gnome.Diesel&Oil 203,750 117,986 67.91 $5,764 92,196 25.790 27.97
Tools 132500 37.941 28.63 94,559 40,562 (2,621) (5.4�
SON,Pohl.&J .Supplies 88,570 38,066 40.72 52,502 31,298 4,770 1524
Lab menimis&Supplies M3.400 155,149 42.69 =251 179,4<6 (24,297) (13.54)
Omar OmmiS PPIics 147,800 87,258 59.04 80,542 102,319 (15,061) (14.72)
(Confined) L
L
W
Section 2-Page 6
LaI
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
r
Ezpense ExpeTma Exppnep Incresso In..
Budget Th. Thru Remaining U. (Ooc-) (ueermen)
.� Des>hp8on 1988.99 1201198 12n1I98 Budget IWIM7 $ %
cx nNwed:
Cednxa xI Servlcea
,r Solids Rerlw.a1 4,128,390 1,803,956 43.70 2324,434 1,935514 034,558) (694)
OMer Wa Dsposal 4W,340 283.538 59% 196.802 211,308 82230 38.91
Gn7vndskeepm9 a JanilWal 2OZ380 60.811 3005 141,569 49.303 11,508 nu
O.W&Leo$ml 111,0D0 38,947 35.09 72053 38.334 613 1.60
Oxygen Plan Oyer 285,000 137.366 48.03 148,632 130,500 6.848 5.26
Other 1,820.240 349,150 19.18 1.471,090 349,M5 (615) (0.18)
proleealonal Services
Legal ioo,= 157,857 39.42 242643 203,224 (45.367) (22.U)
r Audil B Aemuning 42800 46.766 109.78 (4,185) 41,600 5,165 1242
Enghaenng 353.000 85.176 24.13 257.824 156.612 (71,4a6) (45.61)
OBer 1,100,900 277,447 25.M 823.453 296,465 (19,008) (641)
r RemarchBMonhorMg
E.nxnneoW WMonng 1,832000 602711 W.93 1,029209 501,348 1,383 OM
Air O fty Moe W 25000 1,096 4.39 23.902 85128 (59.030) (98.17)
Resear 635,500 192,102 W.M 443,398 316.725 (120,623) (39.35)
� RopNre aMelntaunce
Maherale a Services 2,722500 1,413,224 51.91 1,W9,276 1,705.657 (203,443) (17.19)
Svc.W.,Agm rfts 1,175540 337,158 28.66 839,382 357.839 (2DA81) (sn)
miltee
Telephone 282,600 W,144 35.08 183,456 91,961 7.183 7.81
Oesel FOT Oene ears 34.000 - - 34,OOD - - -
NaWr4lGas 1,175000 489 88,554 41.56 6448 645908 (158,3m) (24.21)
r Po4er 1,273,150 992802 54.40 580,548 539.970 152.632 2d27
W01er 878,700 395.789 40.52 580,911 390,644 5,145 1.32
OMerop dng Suppllee
ONside E9utp panel 100,080 57.778 5297 51,304 58267 (491) (0.84)
r Oalde Eyvip Rental 275,400 108859 54.42 125541 25,282 124,597 493.M
I...Premi. 1,460,000 522350 M78 937,650 628217 (105,887) (16.85)
Fregn 58,550 25,372 44.87 31,178 34.012 (9240) (28.70)
r My O,e ,Expanse 214,100 82241 38.41 131,859 92219 (glen) (IBM)
AOh9)Opem8n9 Foes 142,000 67,0.12 40.45 84,588 - 57.432
Ge.1 Manager Cann ..W 259,400 - - 259,400 - - -
Otre Nond7 Ex nsx 57.1% 11,398 19.0 45,792 12415 (1,017) (8.19)
Mn1L1,Supp,B Se'. 2e960,760 lTgM.3116 39.73 i7p17,454 1 ,-%7 (1,091,881 (8.67)
Coat AlbcLod SOMsr (2.912.900) (1,288A78) 40.16 (1,626.422) (964.373) (322,1W) 33.M
Nat J.O.Aad ,SYPp.a Sorv. 28.037,860 10218,828 3924 15.821.032 11,630,614 (1,413.786) (1218)
Total J.O.Ptx ulmmenffi 49.956,100 II,144,B78 40.33 27.811,124 M.713.469 (1,588,490) (8.81)
Lass: Revnnue (4,758,100) (1,872.625) 39.37 (2851,475) (2355.670) 483,045 (20.51)
Net J.O.Expendihurec 45.200.000 20272351 44.85 24.927.M 21,357.799 (1,085,448) (5.08)
r
Section 2-Pape 7
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item
For the Quarters Ended September 30 and December 31, 1998 �I
Increase In
Expense
Expense Expense Expense Incurred Increase
Thm Thru From 913098 In 2nd Qtr Decrease
Description 120198 SK10198 Thru 1201198 Over tat Qtr %
it
Salaries,Wages,&Benefits
Salaries&Wages 16,421,195 8322,468 8.098,727 (223,741) (259) t
Employee Benefits: y
Retirement 984.125 493,928 490,197 (3,730) (0.76)
Croup Insurances 1,518,014 733.445 784,569 51,125 6.97
Turdon Reimbursement 43,723 25,602 18,121 (7,480) 022)
Undonn Rsdal 29,930 15,611 14,319 (1292) 4828) r�
Workers Compensation 109,500 54,750 54,75D (1) (0.00)
Unmiployment lnsuranw 4,142 3,680 462 (3218) (87A5) j
Total Benefds 2,689,434 1.327,016 1.362,418 35,403 2.67 V
Salaries,Wages,&Benefits 19,110,629 9,649,484 9.461,145 (188.339) (1.95)
Salaries&Ben.Agee.
DimcV Indirect AllocCorf/Diot (7,182.481) (3,316.831) (3,865,650) (648,819) 1655
Net Salary,Wages&Benefits 11,928.148 6.332.653 5.595,495 (737,158) (11.64)
Matt,Supply,&Services
Administrative Expenses
Memberships 95203 59,423 35.780 (23.643) (39.79)
Office Exp-Supplies 94,172 54,423 39,749 (14,673) (26.%)
Once Expense-Other 48,592 28,623 19,969 (8,655) (3024)
Snell Computer Ilene 1D4,121 45,083 59.038 13,954 30.95
Minor Fumiure,FuWres,etc. 12,767 11,020 1,747 (9274) (84.15)
Printing&Publication r
Repro4i+louse 116,436 55,196 61240 6,04.5 10.95
PmNng-Outside 22,518 22,128 390 (21,738) (9824) I
Notices&Ads 11,671 6,648 5.023 (1,625) (24,44) y
Photo Processing 4,403 2910 2.193 (17) (0,76)
Training&Meetings L Meetings 99,445 49,088 50,357 1269 2.68
Treinitlg 97,756 45,510 62246 6.737 14A0
Operating Expenses
Chemical Coagulants 587.114 306,984 2B0,130 (26,855) (8.75) y
Sulfide Control 603,967 298,689 305278 Use 221
Odor Control-Total 7&4,748 401,532 3a3216 (18,315) (4.56)
Chemicals-Cogeneration Oper. 2.743 2.743 0 (2,743) (99.99)
ARscellareous Chemicals 2,423 976 1.447 471 4820 Li
Gasoline,Diesel&O,I 117,986 75,186 42,800 (32.386) (43.07)
Tools 37,941 20,660 17,281 (3,379) (16.35)
SON,Paints.&Jan.Supplies 36,068 21,489 14,579 (6,910) (32.16)
Lab Chemicals&Supplies 155.149 90,172 64,977 (25,196) (27.94)
Other Operating Supplies 87,258 42,B25 44,433 1.607 3.75
V
L
Section 2-Page 8
L.i
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item
- For the Quarters Ended September 30 and December 31, 1998
Increase In
_ Expense
Expense Expense Expense Incurred Increase
Thru Thru From 9=198 In 2nd Otr Decrease
Description 17J31198 9130198 Thru 12/31/98 Over let Oar %
- Continued:
Contractual Servltes
Solids Removal 1,8D3,956 1,127,692 676,254 (451,428) (40.03)
"I Other Waste Disposal 293,6W 42,525 251,012 208.488 490.25
GrouMskeeping B Jani erial 60,811 32,047 28,764 (3.283) (10,24)
Outside lab Services 38,947 24,159 14,788 (9,372) (38.79)
- Oxygen Plana Oper 137,368 68,6S4 65,004 0 0.00
Other 349,150 168,337 182,813 16,475 9.90
Professional Services
,r Legal 157,857 83,381 74.496 (8,8W) (10.63)
Audit B Accounting 46,765 27,087 19,6m (7,409) (27.35)
Engineering 85,176 27,592 57.585 29,993 108.70
09M 277,447 95,656 181,791 86,135 90.05
r
Research 8 NbnBodrg
ErrAro mental Moratoring 802,711 390,980 211,731 (178,249) (45.85)
Air QualBy,Monitoring 1,098 320 778 458 143.13
-' Reseach 192,102 80,ODo 112,102 32.102 40.13
Repairs 8 Maintenance
Matenals B Services 1,413,224 476,811 936,413 459,603 95.39
Sc.Mile.Agreements 337,158 201,095 136.063 (65,033) (32.34)
UtIlities
Telephone 99,144 45.203 63,851 8.557 16.89
- Diesel For Generators - - -
Natural Gas 469,%4 224,303 255,251 40.948 18.26
Po ,ar 692,802 246,015 446,597 200,672 81.53
- Water 395.789 202,164 193,835 (8,519) (4.21)
Other Operating Supplies
Outside Equip Rental 57,776 23.295 - 34,481 11.187 48.02
Disbict Equip Rental 149,859 73.746 76,113 2,388 3.21
r Insurance Premiums 522,350 253,387 258,954 15,577 6.15
Freight 25,372 14,410 10,962 (3,448) (23.93)
Misc.Operating Expense 82241 36,538 45,703 9,165 25.08
r AQMD Operating Fees 57.432 54,834 2,598 (52,238) (95.28)
General Manager Contingency - _ _ _
Other Non-Oper Expense 11,398 4,244 7,154 2,909 85.54
Maus,Supp,3 Sm. 11,91�.306 -T.'663,174 ----
Cost Alec-Corf 80mer (1,286,475) (357,3S5) (899,113) (311,748) 132.11
-' Net J.O.JMatls,SuPp,8 S.- 10,216,828 5,275,809 4,941,019 (334,790) (6.35)
Total J.O.Requirements 22,144,976 11,608,462 10,536,614 (1,071,947) (9.23)
r
Less: Revenue (1,872,625) (1,159,917) (712,708) 447,209 (38.56)
Net J.O.Expenditures 20,272,351 10,448,545 9,823.806 (624,738) (5.98)
r
Section 2-Page 9
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Increase Increase L
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease)
12131/98 12/31197 $ %
Treatment Process: v
Preliminary Treameio 1,931,690 2,616,898 (685,208) (25,18)
Primary Treatnent 2,089,654 2,073,057 16,587 0.80 �+
Semmdary Treatment 1,798,355 1,459,882 338,473 23.19
Cryogenic Ham(Plant 2) U4,024 165,957 (41,933) (25.27) V
Effluent Disposed 270,515 389,005 (118,490) (30.46)
I
Solids Handling 6.951,428 6,100,757 (149,331) (245) V
Cogeneration 1,632,476 2,179,902 (547.426) (25.11)
Utilities 488,965 474,511 14,454 3.05 V
Electrical Distribution 255,671 607,952 (242,281) (47.70)
fAscellaneous Buildings 2,587,520 3,359.795 (772,275) (22.99) V
Air Quality 443,340 411,323 32,017 7.78
Laboratory 1,646,088 2,062,522 (406,454) (19.80) V
Source Control 2,907,272 1,921,898 985,374 51.27
Total Joint Operating Requirements 22,136.976 23,713,469 (1,576,493) (6.65) L
Less: Revenues (1,872,625) (2,355,670) 483,045 20.51
V
Net Joint Operating Expenditures 20,264,351 21,357,799 (1,093,448) (5.12)
L
L
L
L
L
L
Section 2—Page 10
_ J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
December 31, 1998
rw 6]3
66fi
60
10
560 560 549
575 .
50
&JO/95 (Y3pN6 6!!697 6130196 Il/I196
p Actual ❑Vacant
At December 31, 1998, the total head count was 525 employees, or a full time equivalency of
515.25.
Section 2 - Page 11
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
L
L
L
L
u
L
L
section 2— Page 12
L
CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program—FY 1998-99
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Plant 1
$3,331,072
collection Projects 17%
$6.643,689
35%
Plan[2
$2,991,322
16%
m Equipment terns
$982,495
5% Merplant 8 Joint
Special Projects Facilities
^ $2,344,877 $2,766,946
12% 15%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure -$19,060,401
Revenue
Area 13 Revenue
^ $141,551 Area 2
1% 94,256,446
Revenue
Area 3
$6,798,516
^ 36%
Revenue
Area 5
$1,630,764
^ 9°0
Revenue
Area 6
5477,840
Revenue 2%
Area 1 Revenue
$1,355,906 Revenue Revenue Area 7
lea Area 11 Area 14 92,450,M
611019,668 $929,655 13%
5% 5%
Total Capital Improvement Funding -$19,060,401
Section 3— Page 1
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year j
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Ll
1998-99 1998-99 1998.99
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected
Estimated"Outlay @ 12131198 Outlay Outlay
Collection System Improvement Projects
Revenue Area f
a Same Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 87,000 - 67,000 67,000
b Frame,Cwer and Coating Rehab. 20.000 20.000 20.000
Revenue Area 1 Total 87,000 87,000 87.000 J
Revenue Area 2
a Mods.To Newhope-Placentia Sewer 46,200 19.951 20.249 46,200 j
b Carbon Canven Dam Sewer and Pump St. 100,000 2,093 97,907 252.000 LI
c Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief - 55 (66) 100
d Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 746,500 40,478 705,022 40.500
e IS Freeway Widening Project,2.35 56,100 (2,028) 58,128 4.000
f Pump Station Improvements(10%) 122,850 8,5g8 114.152 13.200
9 Santa Ana River IMr.Shut 05 Gate Repl. 460,000 441.278 18.722 626,300
h Same Ana River her.Realignment B Prot. 500.000 111.549 380.451 162,000 li
I Frame,Omer and Coaling Rehab. 20,000 - 20.000 20,000 V
m Miscellaneous Projects 80,000 H0,000 80,000
Revenue Area 2 Total 2.130.850 622.074 1,508,676 11244,300
Rmmnuo Area 3 Iul
a Pump Station Improvements,(14%) 171.990 12,177 159,813 18,480
b Modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer 170.500 113,934 56.566 134.000
c Seal Beach Blvd. Rehab.,3-11R 367.200 6234 350,966 355.000 IIrJ'
d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 2,OB0,000 27.388 2,052,612 2.108.500
a IS Freeway Widening,3.37 46.200 53.814 (7,614) 94,000
f Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hillsboro 2,589.500 48.429 2,541,071 183.500 I '
g Miller-Holder Improv., Imperial Hwy.,3.38-3 1,452.000 2,741,994 (1,289,994) 3.532.000 64
h Frame.Cwer and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20,000 20,000
1 Miscellaneous Projects 80.000 80.000 80.000
Revenue Area 3 Total 8,977,390 3.003,970 3.973,420 8.495.480
Revenue Area 5 L
a Pump Station Improvements,(28%) 343,980 24.353 319,627 30,900
b Beaudrimmon of Bay Bridge Pump Station 73,000 59.024 13,976 88,000
c Newport Blvd.6 PCH Widening 1,098,100 (148,789) 1.246,989 904.510
d Ralowticn of Lido Pump Station 2.350.900 1.105,783 1.155,117 2.490,000
a Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilstation 62,700 - 62,700 82,700
I Frame,Cwer and Coating Rehab. 30.000 - 30.000 30,000 L
9 Miscellaneous Projects 120,000 120,000 120,000
Revenue Ares 5 Total 4,078,880 1,130,371 2,948,309 3,7181170
Revenue Area 6
a Pump Station Improvements,(6%) 73,710 5,219 68,491 7,020
b Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 796,150 (107,144) 002.894 664,980 � I
c Fairview Relief Sewer 2,207,000 116,493 2.091.507 2.316.000 Ir
d Watson Avenue/California St.Sewer - 4,212 (4,212) 43,212
g Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 5,000 - 5,000 6.000
h Miscellaneous Projects 20,000 20.000 20,000
Revenue Area 6 Total 3,100,880 17,180 3.083,880 3,047.122
L
Section 3—Page 2
u
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
1998-99 1998-99 1999-99
- 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projeebd
Estimated Outlay @12y31198 Outlay Outlay
Revenue Area 7
a Pump Station Improvements,(33%) 405.405 28,702 376,703 43.560
b Impmvemene W Main St P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 358,610 197,356 161,254 428.120
e Orange Park Aces Trunk Replacement 1,327,000 862,860 464,140 1,6m3,000
f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 134,000 466 133,534 134,000
,-, g College Ave.Pump Station Parallel Force - 3,561 (3,561) 4,600
h Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 500,000 94,046 405,954 125,000
i 'B"Street 8 Michell St Sewer Replacement 330,000 12,674 317.326 273,000
j Gisler Red Hill Trunk Relocation 385,500 4,994 380,508 49,000
r k Wscellanui Repair of Local Sewers 574.000 - 574,000 674,000
1 Fame, Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10.0()0 10,000
m Miscellaneous Projects 40,000 40.000 40,000
- Revenue Area 7 Total 4,054.515 1.204,659 2,1159,856 3,344.280
Revenue Area 11
- a Pump Station Improvements,(9%) 110,585 7,827 102.738 11.880
b Go!denwesl St Sewer Replacement 418,000 16,971 401.029 27,000
c Go!denwesl SL Trunk Sewer Replacement 304.000 51,606 252.394 266,000
d Warner Avenue Pump Station 65,000 1,079 63,921 11,100
a Heil Interceptor 196,700 52,364 143,336 275.000
f Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 195,000 - 195,000 190,000
g Huntington Beach Sewer B Abandonment 50,000 28.101 21,899 264,000
- h Fame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,0W - 10,000 10,000
i Miscellaneous Projects 40,000 - 40,000 40,000
Revenue Area 11 Total 1.388,265 157,948 1,230,317 1,094,980
.. Revenue Area 13
b Capacity in Carbon Canyon Interceptor 23,ODD - 23,000 23,000
e Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 70D - 700 700
f Capacity in Sanate Ana River Interceptor 93,40D - 93.400 93,400
g Capacity in South River Interceptor 14,500 - 14,500 14,500
h Capacity in New Taft Interceptor 11,90D - 11,900 11,900
- Revenue Area 13 Total 143,500 - 143,500 143500
Revenue Area 14
- a Improvements to Main SL P.S., 7-7-1 (72%) 922,120 507,487 414.6W 1,100.680
b Fame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Revenue Area 14 Total 932,120 507.487 424,633 1,110,880
r
Collection System CIP Total 22,902,980 6,643,689 18,259,291 20,285,712
Section 3-Page 3
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year I I
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 LI
1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 ,; I
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Yrl
Estimated Outlay @12(31/98 Outlay Outlay
Reclamation Plant No. 1
1.Pre irrerwy Treatment 1 j
a Head arks No.2 Control System Upgrade,J-3 1,115,000 413,134 701.866 450,000 N
c.Sunflower P.S.Drive Replxxnent,P7ffi 326,000 - 326,000 -
2-Primary Treabrred
a.Pr inary Effluent Pumping Automation 95,000 - 95,000 It.Pnmary Treatrravrt 72 MGD Expansion,P7-37 1,000,000 225.314 774,656 1,226,000 4wO
c Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 100,OOD 129,030 (29,030) le9,030
d.Adv. Primary Rhymer Batdling PLC Progm. 109,500 - 109,500
3.Secondary Treament rl
b.Seoondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P 21110,000 817,364 (617,364) 1,378,000
c.Drain Modifications at Activated Sludge Plant,P 110,000 911 109.089 1,000
4.Solids Handing&Derratenrg
b.Automation of Solids Storage Fac, Pl60 150,000 55.5&5 94.435 56,000 v.
5.Utility Systems
a Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P 10,000 554.964 (674,964) 665,000
Is Elect. Facility 6loddns&Safety Upgrades,Pl- 70D,OOD 19.581 660.419 80,ODD �.
Transfer to Project Belau (12,500) - 0Z600)
Alarm Beacons for venting of Gas Holder 12.500 785 11,715 1.000
c.Fac MOQdrs&Safety Upgrades,Pt-00.2 10,000 15,973 (5,973) 16,O00
d Drainage Impmv.At Ram 1, of-40-3 218,000 201,685 16,335 227,000 LJ
f.Chemical Facility MDOM,PI-46-2 1,200,000 26.630 1,173,370 51,000
e.CNG Refueling Station,P7-51 433,816 406,389 27,427 490,000
S.Safety Improvemerts
a Seirnic Retrofit of Non-Snrchae Systems, P1-4 218,000 76,554 141,446 77,000
to Seismic Retrofit Seneural tons,PIM 304,000 10,507 293,493 11,000
c.Sesatic Re"M of Four Structures, PI.444 1,125,000 23,607 1.101,393 224,ODO --
7.Mscellaneous&Support Projects
r
a Landscaping Project for Undeveloped Area 33,000 1,318 31,682 2,000
b.Replace Air Corxfidonirg Units @ Warehouse 35.000 - 35,OO11
c.Sept Six Cea Fred Ceiling Healers @ Fleet 20,000 - 20,000 -
d Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters @ B 29,0w 29.000 -
aWasteSideStreamAutomation 50,000 - 50.000 50,000
I.Allowance fa Planned Small Projects 1,900,000 221.781 1.678.219 443,OD0
Sub-Teal -Reolamadon Plaml 9.491.316 3.331.072 6,100.244 5.637,030 �
Treabnern Nam No.2
1.Prelininary Treatment
a.Headworks Impnovennems Q Plant 2,P2£6 1,ODO,000 2D,841 979,159 21,000 L
b.Improvements to Influent Samping System,P2 35,000 - 35,000 -
2.Primary Treatrnen
It.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 666,000 204.975 371,025 335.000
3.Secondary Tneatrnem L
a.DAF.Thickener Surface Skim.Sup.Rats 65,000 - 65.000 -
b.Rehab or Secondary Fadill P2-74 485,OOD - 485,000
4.Solids Handling&Dewstering 75,000 40,000
a.Corveyor Bed Rapt.-Solids Storage Loading 75,000 -
It,Devtaering Belt Press Rebuld 220,OD0 295 219,705 150,000
c.Di9eation&Dewaterirg ReliaNRefubishnrem - - -
d.Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 817,000 141.410 675,590 342,000 L
e.TNAS Feed to Digesters F&G,P2-39-1 110,000 78,D49 31.951 116,O1110
f.Solids Storage Facility at Plam 2,P2-60 1,000,000 472.347 527.653 663,O1110 _
li
L
Section 3-Page 4
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
- For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
1998-99 1998-99 1998-99
r, 1997-98 Actual Remaining Protected
Estimated Outlay @ 1213198 Outlay Outlay
5.Utility Systems
a.Digester Gas Flare Control System Upgrade,P 154,000 - 154,000 -
r c.Modify Fire Protection,Signs&Water Sys,P24 10,000 584.124 (574,124) 585,000
d.Fire&Water Sys Modifns,P246-2 7,000 10,153 (3,163) 11,000
e.Electi Fac Medifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-1 1.500,000 62,664 1,437,338 463,000
f.Chemical and Plant Water Modifns,P255 10p00 253.402 (253,402) 264,000
r g.Air Compressors for Plate Air System,P261 240,000 28.706 211294 79.000
h.Gas Compressor Redundancy,P2-79 525,000 525,000 -
6.Be"Improvements
r a.Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2355 31,000 9.253 21,747 119,000
b.Seimic Retrofit of NonStruchlre Systems,P2-5 131,000 216,410 (85.410) 217.000
c.Seismic Retrofit,Structural hems P2-53-2 469.000 13,592 465.408 14,000
d.Rehab Tunnel Lighting System,P2-78 279,000 - 279.000 -
r 7.Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a.Maintenance Building,P2-353&-1 70.000 343,666 (273,666) 344,000
b.Warehouse Building,P265 1,130,000 45,436 1,084,564 671,000
c.Fac Modlfns&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 10.000 97,185 (97.185) 98,000
r d.Replace Air Conditioning @ Liquid Oxygen Ro 21,000 - 21,000 -
e.Replace Air Conditioning @ Oper Center 22,000 - 22,000 I.Replace Exhaust Fans@ Operations Center 12.100 - 12.100 -
r g.Replace EAstion Supply&Return Duckwork 30,000 - 30,000
h.Plant 2 Facilities Engineering 1.900.000 308.814 1.591,185 315,000
Sub-Total -Treatment Plant2 11,025.100 2.991,322 8.033.775 4,867,000
r Interplant and Joint Faellhies
1.Plant Automation&Computerization
a.Computerized Fee Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25 385,000 80,087 304,913 151,000
b.Sec.Treatment Monk&Ctd System Upgrade, 300,000 58,852 241.148 99,000
- c.Power Monitoring and Control Systems,J-33-3 198,000 - 198,000 -
d.PlantReinventon/Automation Project J42 2,706,000 645,754 2.060,246 1,106,000
e.Conv.Of Modbus+Date Hwys te Ring Config 210,000 42,376 167.624 43,000
r f.Fiber Optic Upgrades 456.500 108.208 348,292 109,000
g.SCADA Administration Savors Improvement 160,000 - 150,000 120,000
h.SW Plant 1 Q Field Fiber Optic Term.Jet Fa 229.700 23,534 206,166 24,000
2.Safety&Security Improvements
r a.Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1&2,J-35 955.000 86.647 868,353 637,000
b.Confined Specs Personnel Retrieval System,J. 113,000 23.188 89,812 24,000
c.Fire Alarm&Security System Upgrade,J57 298,250 281,239 17,011 422,000
3.Support Facilities
a.Enclose Open Bay at warehouse Storage,J-20 157.000 - 157,000
b.Collection Facilities Depot,J60-1 136,910 2270 134,640 2,300
Transfer to Project Below (2,023) - (2,023) -
r Chlorine Bldg Mach Equip Demolition,J60 2.023 15,902 (13,879) 16,000
c.Infonnebon Technelog ies Trailer Addition,J-61 243,000 27.268 215,732 28,000
4.Utility Systems Improvements
a.Electrical Power System Studies.J-254 439,000 361,243 T7,757 817,00D
r b.Electrical Power System Studies,J-25-5 97,500 - 97.500 -
c.Standby Power Reliability Modifns,J-33-1 947,000 178,740 768.260 979,000
d.Cable Tray lmprovemenla,J47 2,500.000 183.566 2,316,434 434,000
e.Impvr.To Central Generation Starting Air Syste 36,000 - 36,000 -
- f.MdgOon of Gen.Gen.Waste Hest Boiler,J64 50,000 5,521 44.479 15,000
g.Gas Mixing Systems Improvements,J-88 208.000 9,005 198,995 19.000
r
Section 3-Page 5
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 �1
1998-99 1998.99 1998-99
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Irrj
Estimated Dueay @12J31198 Outlay Outlay
5. Flow Management&Reliability
&Surge Tower Replacement J34-1 32,000 67,334 (35,334) 305,000 LI
c.Wife[]Flow Meter Replacement J-66 90.000 - 90.000 -
d. Peak Flow Maragement Projects,J-67 100,000 - 100,000 - 1
6.Miscellaneous Projects 69
a.Revision of Standard Specifications,J-44 150,000 65,803 64,197 186.000
b. Evaluation of Tunnels for Structural Integrity,J- 203,ODD 17.615 185,355 18,000
c.New Grit Augers,J-52 558,000 24277 533,723 145,000 I
d.Maddm to Existing Mechanical System,J-62 143,000 - 143,000 70,000 u
e.Turret Flooding Monitoring System,J-65 30,000 - 30.000 -
f.Mechanical Seals on Ftgh Rate Digester lift 517,000 82.307 434.093 160.000
h.Joint Facilities Engineering 1,400,000 376,210 1,023,790 SBQ000
SubTatal -liderpiant&Joint 14,038.880 2,766.946 11.271,914 6,460,30D �1
Sub-Total - Major Projects 34,555,276 9,089,340 25,465,936 16,954,330
Special Projects V
1.Strategic&Master Raring
a. Imrestigabon antl Rehab of Ocean Outfall,J39 390,000 99,966 290,034 285,000
In.Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,J-4 379.850 (149,899) 529.749 (10D,OOD) J
c. Determ.Of Fin Charges and Fee Sc ed.,JAO-2 94,145 6.740 87,405 7,000
d.Treatment,Reuse aid Disposal Plan,J<0F3 862,0oo 202,509 449.491 578,OOD
e.CEQA,Public Participation,J-40-4 514,000 44,337 469.863 295,001)
f.Permit Pe l&Maintenance 50,O110 28,885 21.115 50.000 }tj
g.Ram O&M Manual&S.O.P. Irtpm.Project 230,000 - 230,000 230,ODD
2. Into a6on Management&Computerization
a.Air Quality Infortnotiat Mgmt.Sys. 180.000 39,038 140,962 180,000 j
b.Automation Report Publishing 120,OD0 47,346 72,654 95,000
c.CMMS Programming 230.000 94,518 135,482 170.000
d. Data Integration 1.489,000 5M,702 897,298 1,489,000
e. Document ManagemarR 571,000 105,379 465,621 325.000
f.Financial Information System(m 450,ODO 1OZ395 287,605 45D.000
g.Geographic Information System 180,000 573 179,427 180,000
h. InMnet Application DwelopmeN 188.240 11,774 176.456 188,240
i. Intranet Application Development 91,81110 27281 64,339 91,e0D kr
j. L.I.M.S. Implementation Phene 11 75.000 5,9U0 89,100 75,000
k. Network Badatone Upgrade Continuator, 579,040 62487 516,573 579,040
L Network Test Facility 105,000 13.M 91,741 105,000
m.Source Control Programnung 255,1100 90.708 154294 255,000 v
n. Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 240,000 14,462 225,538 240,001)
o.VaceVata Building Rewiring 221,050 40,794 180,266 221,080 I
p.Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 111,980 - 111,980 111,980 4
q.Year 2000 Data Charge 185,000 654,083 (468.083) 1,800,000
3.Research&Developmem
a.Acirmted Carbon Full Scale Evaluation 60.000 - 60,000 80.000 I 1
It.Bictrickling After Development&Demonstration 123,500 355 123,145 123,600 V
c.Large Scale Miaofiltrabon Demonstration 55,500 28,113 27,387 55,50D
d.Misc Optimization Studes&Improvements 210,0DO - 210,000 50,000 -ri
e. Primary Effluent Fla2tion Large-Scale Test 207,OD 5Q 0 28,662 13W 207,000
f. Processes to Achieve Gass A Biceolids 117,000 630 116,370 117,OOD
4
Section 3-Page 6
L
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
199&99 1998-99 1998-99
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected
Estimated Outlay Co112V31/98 Outlay Outlay
4. Utility Systems
�+ a.Cen Gan Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 550.000 26,216 523,784 550.000
b.Can Gen Engine NOX 8 VOC Emission Eval 195,000 - 195,000 195,000
c.Kcmax Direct Steam Injection System 46,000 - 46,0DO 46,0DO
d.Plam 1&2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 240,000 - 240.000 200,D00
- e.Plant Waxer Station Valve U -Upgrade 27,000 27,000 25,000
f. Upgrade Phone System 40.000 2,699 37,301 40.000
5. Prooass-Related Special Projects
r a.H202 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 35,OW - 35.000 35,000
b. Prelim Corrosion Ass"Study for Collation 7ZOW - 72,000 72,ODO
c.Headxwks Main Sever Pump Rehab 150,0W 70,804 79,196 100,ODO
d. Headwoks Scrubber Seal Retrofit 10,000 - 10.000 10.000
e. Digesters Expansion Joint Replacement 76,000 - 75.000 75,DDO
f. KADY Process for Digester Performance Imprv. 85,S00 - 85,80D 85,800
g. Repi Pn Clarifiers Fail Air W/D TreM,Coupli 32,000 - 32.WO 32,000
h.Clarifier Efficiency Impmvemems 100,000 - 100.000 -
I. Belt Press Automation 175,000 - 175,000 40.000
j.Bets Press Drive Unit Replacement 50,000 - S0,000 -
k. P-2 Sludge Girder ReplacementfRehab 224,ODO - 224,000 180,000
-' I. P-2 Sludge Une Expansion Joint RepVRehab 60,000 14.062 45,9W 60,OW
m.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 415,000 23,926 391,074 415,ODO
n.SaBur Monitoring for Combustion 101,000 43.916 57,084 101,ODO
o. Upgrade Emission Modeling Testing System 22,000 1,380 20,620 22,000
- 6.Mscellarxxwa
a. Replacement of Plant Process Equipmem 80,000 - 80,ODO 80,000
b. Wsadarams Reliability 8 Redund.Projects 50,0DO - 50,000 50,000
- Pit 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 35 335 (300)
c.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 00.000 28,277 51,723 80,000
f.Security System Improvements 257,80D 2,489 255,311 257.800
Sub-Total-Spada)projects 11,528,535 2,464.059 9.084.476 11.265.540
Water Management Projects
a. Grourdmter Replenishment System, J-36 776.000 36,837 738,163 775,000
b. Water Conservation Cooperative Projects 2D0,000 7,010 192,990 2W,OW
- c.Coy lnfiftr4DNlnflow Caoperalne Projects 100,000 - 100,000 1D0,000
Sub-Total-Water Managemem projects 1,075,000 43,847 1,031,153 1,075,000
- Equipment hems 2,124,000 982,495 1,141,5W 2,000,000
Total Treatment 8 Disposal Projects 49,2B2,811 12,579,741 36,703,070 31,304,870
Construction in progress Completed at M0198 (163,029) 163.029 -
Total Collections,Treatment and Disposal Pro 72,185,791 19,060,401 53,125,390 51.590,582
Section 3- Page 7
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 u
Current Total
Approved 6130198 Year Projected Rem alning j
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future ill
Budget Cost Cost 0130099 Budget
Collection system Improvement Projects
Revenue Area I
a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 7.494.500 - 67,000 67,000 7,427,500
b Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20.000 20.000 20,000
Revenue Area 1 Tom[ 7.514.500 87,000 $7.000 7.427.500
Revenue Area 2 Ilwl
a Mods.To Newhope-Placentis Sewer 66.200 4.373 46,200 $0.573 15.027
I,Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer and Pump St. 2,194.D00 5.888 262.000 267,980 1.030.014
c Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief 16,572,000 - 100 100 16.671.900 I '
it Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 1,065.600 41,713 40,500 82,219 BB9,9B] y
e IS Freeway Widening Project,2-36 - 140.800 102.093 4.000 106,093 34.707
I Pump Station Improvements(10%) 429,300 71.121 13,200 84,321 344,979
a Santa Ana River Intr.Shut OR Gate Rapt. 767,000 96.409 626,300 722,709 34,281
It Santa Ana River Intr.Realignment 8 Prot 11.864.000 13,527 162,000 175,627 11,688.473
1 Abandonment of Yeam Linda Pump Station 280.000 - - 2a0,000
j Replacement of Newhope Placentia Trunk 8.022.000 - - - 8.022.000
it Replacement of Cypress Ave.Subtrurk 7,180,000 - - - 7.180.000
I Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20,000 20,000
Miscellaneous Projects 801000 BOA00 $0,000
Revenue Area 2 Total 48,67D,900 335.222 1,244,3110 1,579,522 47.091.378
Revenue Area 3 j ,
a Pump Station Improvements,(14%) 600,460 99,689 18,480 118,049 482.411 u
b Modifications to Magnolta Relief Sawer 212,300 23.251 134,000 157,281 65.019
c Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3.11R 496,200 9,386 355,000 364,388 131.812
d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 6.327,400 373,521 2,108,500 2,482,021 2.845,379
al-S Freeway Widening,3.37 67.100 65,564 64,000 119,664 (52A64) 1
1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hlllstmm 0,312.000 346,761 163,500 529,261 5.782.739 YYYrrdll
a Mlller-HOMer Improv., Imperial Hwy.,3.38-3 6.344.000 2.512.753 3,532,000 6.344,753 (753)
h Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20.000 20,000 -
1 Miscellaneous Projects $0.000 - 809000 80,000 -
Revenue Area 3Tout 10.469.480 3.719.837 8.495A80 10,216.317 9.244.143
Revenue Area 5
a Pump Station Improvements,(28%) 1.201.760 199.137 36,960 236,097 965.663
b Beautification of Bey Bridge Pump Station 80,000 12.386 68.000 80,386 (386) L
c Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 1,207.900 230,851 904.510 1.135.361 72.439
d Relocation of Lido Pump Station 3,318,700 491,067 2.496.000 2.967,Da7 331.613
a Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilabdon 2,245.100 - 62.700 62.700 2.182,400
f Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 30.000 - 30.000 30.000 -
g Miscellaneous Projects 120.000 120,000 1201000 M
Revenue Area 6 Total 8,203,360 933.461 3.718.170 4.651.631 3.551.729
Revenue Area 6
a Pump Station Improvements,(6%) 257.520 42,673 7.920 50,693 206.927 YYYPPP
b Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 874.480 318.795 654.990 073,786 (99.305)
c Fairview Relief Sewer 3.138.300 389.185 2,316.000 2,7059 185 433116 }
all Watson Avenue I California St.Sewer 2,176.000 83.508 43,212 126.720 2,049:280
e Old'Dishid B Trunk'Parallel 1,719.000 - - - 1.719.000 V
r Dover Drive Parallel Sewer 1.093.000 - - - 1,603,DOD
g Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 5.000 - 5.000 5.000 -
a Miscellaneous Projects 20.000 - 20,000 20,000 -
Revenue Area B Total 10.083.300 834,161 3.047.122 3,881,20 61202.017 V
III
Ll
Section 3—Page 8
L
as CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Current Total
Approved 9I30198 Year Projected Remaining
aw Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Coat Coat 6130I99 Budget
a4 Revenue Area 7
a Pump Satlon Improvements,(33%) 1,416,360 23,260 43,560 66,820 113491540
b Improvements to Mein St.P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 1.088,680 798,542 428,120 1,226,662 (139,982)
c Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment 216.000 - - - 215.000
,r d Covey Lane Pump Station Abandonment 210.000 - - 210,000
e Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement 1,685,200 80.106 1.663,000 1.723.108 (37,906)
f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 491.000 - 134.000 134,000 357,000
9 College Ave.Pump Station Parallel Force 1.877.000 60.354 4.600 64.954 1,812,046
h Armstrong Subbunk Sewer 7,016,000 12,862 125,000 137.862 0.876.338
aw i -B'Street 8 Michell SL Sewer Replacement 395.000 11611 273,000 274,811 120,189
1 Gialer Red Hill Trunk Relocation 5,006,000 - 49,000 49,000 6.867,000
k Miscellaneous Repair of Lose l Sewers 2,291.000 - 574,000 574,000 1,717,000
,..I Miscellaneous
Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 10.000 10.000 -
Mlscellaneous Projects 40,000 40,000 40,000
Revenue Area 7 Total 22,639,240 056.736 3,344,280 4,301,016 18,336,225
we Revenue Area 11
a Pump Station Improvements,(9%) 306.280 5.343 11.880 18,223 368,057
b G ildenweat St Sewer Replacement 491,700 161,276 27,000 206.278 283,422
c Goldenwast SL Trunk Sewer Replacement 3,920.400 2.384 268,000 266,384 3.652.016
we d Wamer Avenue Pump Station 1,391,000 104.862 11,100 115,762 1,275,238
e Hell Interceptor 4,072,900 2,336 275,000 277,336 3,795,564
f Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 2.053.640 190,000 190,000 1,863,640
9 Huntington Beach Sower 8 Abandonment 370,000 294 264,000 264,294 105,706
h Frame,Cover and Coaling Rehab. 10.000 - 10,000 10,000 -
aw i Miscellaneous Projects 140.000 40,000 40,000 100.000
Revenue Ana I Total 12.836.920 297,297 1,094,980 1,302.277 11,443,643
aw Revenue Ayes 13
a Capacity in Euclid Interceptor 2,661,600 - - - 2.801.600
I,Capacity in Carbon Canyon Interceptor 5,845,148 - 23,000 23,000 5,822,148
c Capacity in Rlch4old Trunk 36,968 - - - 36,968
we d Capacity in Kellogg Trunk 23,852 - - - 23,852
a Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 44,942 - 700 700 44,242
f Capacity in Senate Ana River Interceptor 5,884,303 - 93,400 03,400 5.790.993
g Capacity in South River Interceptor 935,918 - 14,600 14,500 921.418
we It Capacity In New Taft Interceptor 296.679 - 11,900 11,900 284.779
i Capacity In Orange Perk Acres Sewer 4.225.924 4,225.924
Revenue Ana 13 Total 1Q955,424 143,500 143,500 19,811.924
vr' Revenue Area 14
a Improvements to Main St.P.S.,7-7-1 (72%) 2,794,320 2,053,393 1,100,880 3,154,273 (359.953)
b Frame,Cover and Causes Rehab, 10,000 10,000 10.000
Revenue Area 14 Total 2,804.320 2.053.393 1,110.880 3,164.273 (359,953)
wa
Collection System CIP Total 152,166,424 9,130.106 20,285,712 29,415,818 122.70.606
aw
we
we
Section 3-Page 9
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Current Total
Approved 6/30198 veer Projected Remaining L
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Coat Cost e130199 Budget
Reclamation Plant No.1
1.Peliminary Treatment VI
a. Headwork.No.2 Control System Upgrade,J41 1.546.000 1.178,570 450,ODD 1.625.570 (62,570)
b. Headwork.Rehab/Relerbishment 3,000,000 - - - 3.000,000
c.Sunfiower P.S.Drive Replacement,P"2 326,000 - - - 326.000
2.Primary Treatment
a.Primary Effluent Pumping Automation 06,000 - - 95,000 �
b.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,PI-37 62.127,000 307.330 1,226.000 1.533.339 80,5931661
c.Prim Clarifiere 3.4 8 5 Rehab, P141 1,845,000 1.504,313 169.030 1.673,343 171.657
it.Adv.Primary Polymer Botching PLC Progm. 109,500 - - - 109.500
3.Secondary Treatment 4
e.Sec.Trent Process Rehab/Refurbishment 5.600,000 - - - 6.500,000
b.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 60 MOD,Pt 40.600,000 38,324,250 1.378,000 39,702,258 1.097.742
c.Diets Modifications at Activated Sludge Plant.P 123,000 4,205 1,000 5,205 117.795
4.Solids Handling 6 Dewatering V
a.Digestion 6 Dewatering Rehab/Rafurbiahment SA001000 - - - 8,600.000
b.Automation of Solids Storage Fec. P"O a98,o00 4,318 56,00D 60,316 637,664
S.Utility System$ •I
a.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods., P1 2,686,100 2,513,707 685.000 3,158,707 (513.007) 11rr1.
b.Elect.Facility ModiMe B Safety Upgmdea,P14 095,000 201,583 60,000 281,563 813.417
Transfer to Project Belot, (12,600) - - - (12,500)
Alarm Seasons for Venting of Ga.Holder 12,60D - 1.000 1,000 11,Soo
c.Fee Meddle S Safety Upgrades,P140.2 1,665,000 1.550.290 15.000 1,68B,2Sa 98,702
d.Ominage Improv.At Plant 1,P140.3 220,000 12,783 227.000 239,763 (1S,7a3)
a.Plant Utilities RehablRefurbishment 500,000 - - 500.000
/.Chemical Facility Mothers,P146.2 3,496,00D 516,443 51,000 567,443 2,928.557
e.Cho Refueling Station,P141 1,402,609 1.042.931 490.000 1.532,931 (130.322)
S.Safety Improvements u
a.Selmic Retrofit of Non-Stmctu s Systems,P14 1,446,000 1,208,039 77,000 1,286,039 160,961
b.Seismic Recent Strucfual Items,P144 2.690,000 110,542 11,000 121.542 2.468.455
c.Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures, P1444 1,229,000 2,370,276 224,000 2,594,276 (1,385'278)
7.Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects L.
a.Landscaping Project for Undeveloped Area 33,000 - 2,000 2,000 31,000
b.Replace Air Conditioning Units @ Warehouse 35.000 - - 35.000 _
c.Rep!Six Gas Filed Ceiling Heat..®Float 20.000 - - - 20,000
d.Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters @ B 29.000 - - - 29,000 1
e.Waste Side Stream Automation 50,000 60,000 $0.000 YYYrrill
/.Allowance for Planned Smell Projects 41,800,ODO 58,625 443,000 601,825 41.298.375
Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 184.285,209 50,908,228 5.837,030 66,646,258 127.719.951
Treatment Plant No.2 u
1.Preliminary Treatment
a. Headverks Improvements®Plant 2,P246 14,708,000 15,191 21.000 36,191 14,671.009
a.1 Replacement of Bertelsen Influent Gate,P24 - 5.032 - 6.032 (5,032)
b.Improvements to Influent Sampling System,P2- 70,000 - - - 70,000 'IL
2.Primary Treatment
a.Primary Treatment RehablRefurbishment 9,618,000 - - - 9,618,000
b.Primary Clarifier Rehab, P248 5.637,000 4,076.330 335,000 5.311.330 325,670
3.Secondary Treatment
e.D.A.F.Thickener Surface Skim.Sup.Rails 65,000 - - - 65.000
b.Rehab of Secondary Facilities,P2-74 6,841,000 - - - 6.641.000
Y1
y
Section 3-Page 10 I
W
wo CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
ow For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Current Tolel
r Approved 6130m8 Year Projected Financial.,
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Cost Cast 8130199 Budget
4.Solids Handling A Dewatermg
a.Conveyor Bait Repl.-Solids Storage Loading 75.000 - 40.000 40.000 35.000
as, b.Dewatedng Be8 Press Rebuild 825,000 - 150.000 150,000 675,0a0
C.Digestion A Deenatedng Rehab/Refurbishment 7,800,000 - - - 7,800,000
d.Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 21,000,000 886,515 342.00D 1.228,515 19.771,4115
e.TWAS Feed to Digesters F 8 G.P2-39-1 200,000 84,571 116.O0D 200.571 (571)
val f.Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P2-60 9,993,OD0 96,901 683,000 779,901 9.213.090
S.Utility Systems
a.Digester Gas Flats Control System Upgrade.P2 154.000 - - - 154,001)
b.Plant Utilities Rehab/Reforbiahment 1.000.000 - - - 1,000,000
c.Modify Fire Processed,Signs 8 Water By., P24 3.763.000 3,410,294 585.000 3.996.294 (232.294)
as d.Fire A Water Sys Mugged.P246-2 200,000 172,752 11.000 183.752 16.248
e.Elect Fee Machine A Safety Upgraded,P247-1 4,400.000 502.446 483,000 965.446 3,434,554
I.Chemical and Plant Water Medians.P2-55 4,200.000 4.164.538 264.000 4.428,538 (228.536)
g.Air Compressors for Plant Air System,P241 560.000 1.935 70.000 80,935 479.065
we h.Gas Compressor Redundancy, P2-79 $26.000 - - - 526,000
S.Safety Improvements
a.Phase II Site S Security Imp.,P2-35-5 1,456,632 1,337,385 119,000 1.456,385 (753)
b.Seimle Robert of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 1,811,000 1,297,851 217.000 1,514,851 296,149
C.Seismic Retrofit.Structural Items P2-53-2 4,424,000 4,176,007 14,000 4.190.007 233.993
ass d.Rehab Tunnel Lighting System, P2-78 279,000 - - - 279.000
T.Miscellaneous A Support Projects
a.Maintenance Building.P2-35-3 A-1 9.356.000 6,790AS4 344,000 7.134,864 2,223,136
b.Warehouse Building,P2-65 1,330,000 108,106 671,000 779,106 560.894
we c.Fee Moultrie A Safety Upgrades,P247-2 1.630,000 1,468,586 98.000 1,666.686 63.414
d.Replace Air Conditioning®Liquid Oxygen Re 21,000 - - - 21.000
a.Replace Air CondiBoning 0 Oper Center 22,000 - - - 22.000
I.Replace Exhaust Fans®Operation.Center 12.100 - - - 12.100
g.Replace Existun Supply A Return Duckwork 30,000 - - - 30.000
wo h.Plant 2 Fec8lis.gagman., 41,800,000 192,736 315.000 507.736 41.292.264
Sub-Total -Treatment Plant2 153.807,732 29.688,038 4,667.000 34,555,038 119.252.694
Insentient and Joint Facilities
sal 1.Plant Automation B Computerization
a.Computerized Fee.Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25 4,605,000 725,741 151,000 a76,741 3.728.259
b.SOc.Treatment Mo.It 6 Cbl Sysfom Upgrade,J 11816.000 221.420 99.000 320,420 1.605.500
c.Power Monbodea and Control Strom..,J-33-3 4,033.000 - - 4,033,000
as, d.Plant Reirvenlion/AutomaOon Project.J42 25,760.000 319.882 1.106.000 1.425.882 24,334,118
e.Cons.Of Modbu.•Data Hwys to Ring Cdefi, 210.000 - 43.000 43,000 167,000
I.Fiber Optic Upgrades 660,000 - 109.000 109.000 651XI)
g.SCADA Administration Sofwere Improvement 150.000 - 120.000 120,000 30,000
h.Stdz Plant 1A2 Field Fiber Optic Term.Jet Fa 324,700 - 24.000 24,000 300,700
we 2.Safety A Security Improvements
a.Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1 8 2,J-35- 1,000,000 53.810 637,000 690,810 309.190
b.Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J4 352,000 - 24,000 24,000 328.000
c.Fire Alarm A Security System Upgrade,J-57 560AINO 156,861 422.000 578.861 (18.861)
ass 3.Support Facilities
a.Endless Open Bay at warehouse Storage,J-20- 175.000 28.031 - 28.031 146,969
b.Collection Facilities Depot,340-1 846,000 - 2,300 2,300 843,700
Transfer to Project Below (136,910) - - - (136.910)
ead Chlorine Bldg Mech Equip Demolition.J-60 136.010 - 16,000 16.000 120.910
c.Information Technologies Trailer Addition,J-51 243.000 - 28,000 28,000 215.D00
d.Building Rehab/Refurbishment 1,455.000 - - - 1.455.1100
war
ass
ow
Section 3-Page 11
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 LLL
Current Total
Approved 6130198 Year Projected Remaining L
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Coat Cost 6130199 Budget
4.Utility System.Improvements
a.Electrical Power System Studies,J-254 3.171,000 148.631 017.000 963.631 2207369
to Electrical Power System Studio.,J-25-5 3,3118,000 - - - 3:300:000 V
c.Standby Power Reliability Madded,J-33-1 17.206.000 735,879 979.000 1,714.879 15,491,121
all.Coble Tray Improvements.J47 12.750,000 86,174 434.000 529,174 12.220,826
e.Impvr.To Centel Generation Starling Air System 136,000 - - - 136,000 j
f.Magellan of Can.Gen.Waste Heat Boiler,J44 200,000 - 15.000 15.000 186,000 L
g.Gas Mixing Systems Improvements,J45 497.000 442 19,000 19,442 477,558
h.Electrical Facilities Relate Refurtemi nt 6,670.000 - - - 6.670.000
S.Flow Management&Reliability I
a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-M-1 8.259.106 7.953,617 305,000 8,259,817 (511) IYsII
b.Foster OuNall Pumping Station Rehab,J59 13,040,000 - - - 13.040.000
c.Oufell Flow Meter Replacement,J-06 924.000 - - 924.000 _
d.Peak Flow Management Projects,J47 3,640,000 - - - 3,640.000
S.Miscellaneous Project
a.Revision of Standard Specifications,J44 341,000 36,122 188,000 202,122 135.678 V
to Evaluation of Tunnel.for Structural Integrity,J-5 236.000 10.700 10,000 28,700 207,300
c.Now Grit Augers,J42 S8D,000 - 146,000 145,000 415,000
d.Moddes to Existing Mechanical System,J42 1.473.000 - 70,000 70,000 1,403,000
e.Tunnel Flooding Monitoring System,J45 150.000 - - - 100,000 L
f.Mschenimil Seals on High Rate Digester Mix 517,000 - 150,000 150,000 367.000
g.Odor Control Process RehablRefurbishment 1,800,000 - - 1,800,000
h.Joint Facilities Engineering 30,800,000 245.904 660,000 $05,904 20,994.090
flub-Total -Intendant B Joint 148,057.606 10,730,214 6.460,300 17,100.514 130,887,292 u
Bub-Total - Major Projects 486,130.747 91.326,480 16,904,330 108,290,810 37748391937 'l
Special Projects lal
1.Strategic S Master Planning
a.Investigation and Rehab of Oman Ouffi J-39 1.439,600 759,201 285.000 1.044.201 395.309 _
b.Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,J40 2.646,350 2,SS4,178 (100.000) 2,454,178 192,172
a.Determ.Of Fin Charges and Fee Schad.,J40-2 604,145 670,860 7.000 885,850 8,298
d.Treatment.Reuse and Disposal Pan.J40-3 1,402.000 1,251,474 578,000 1,829,474 (387,474) Yrl
e.CEQA,Public Participation,J404 682,000 162.707 296,000 457,707 224.293
L Permit Renewal&Maintenance 50,000 696,078 50,000 748,078 (606,078)
g.Plant O&M Manual&S.O.P.Improv.Project 230.000 - 230.000 230,000 - ^�
2.Information Management&Compulerixaaon ad
a.Air Quality Information Marti.Sys. 250,OOD 44,934 180.000 224,034 26,086
b.Automation Report Publishing 195.000 - 95,000 96,000 100,000 -
c.CMMSProgramming 490,000 104,168 170,000 274,166 215834 l
d.Dale Integration 4,334.000 265,262 1.489.000 1.764,262 2,579:736 L
e.Document Management $00,000 37,434 326.000 362,434 437,668
f.Financial Information System(IT) 2,475,000 1.988.157 450,000 2,436,157 38.843 _
g.Geographic Information System 074,000 - 180.000 160,000 604,000
In. Internet Application Development 362,240 39.351 168,240 227.591 154,649 I4,
L Intranet Application Development 235,600 35.416 91,600 127,416 108,184
J. L.I.M.S. Implementation Phase II 505,600 380,956 75.000 466,958 49.042
k. Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 1.439.040 490,507 579,040 1,069,547 369.403
I.Nsthem,Test Facility 125.000 - 105,000 105.000 20,000
m.Source Cenral Programming 576.000 147,745 255,000 402,745 173.255
n.Strategic Information Archneclure(SIA) 724,000 189.621 240.000 429,621 294,379
o.VOIcelData Building Rewiring 570.080 202,692 221,080 513,672 56,408
p.Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 111,980 - 111.980 111,9a0 - I
a.Year 2000 Data Change 2,141,500 35,709 1,800,000 1.836,709 305,791 �
L
L
Section 3-Page 12 -
L
we CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Current Total
Approved 6130198 Year Projected Rama let.,
Project Accumulated Projected Costal, Future
Budget Cost Cost 6130199 Budget
3.Research&Development
a.Activated Carbon Full Scala Evaluation 60,000 - 60,000 $0.000 -
ud b.Biotnckling Filter Development&Demenstm5on 123.500 - 123.500 123.500 -
a.Large Scale Mlcroflltratlon Demonstration 96,500 46,225 55.500 102225 (5,725)
d.Miss Optimization Studies&Improvements 430.000 44,222 50,000 94222 335,778
e.Primary Effluent Flatness Large-Smile Test 349,13 D0 195,301 207,000 402,301 (53.301)
f.Processes Is Achieve Class A MosdMd 127,000 314 117.000 117,314 9.686
4.Utility Systems
a.Gen Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 560.000 42,590 550.000 592,690 (32.500)
b.Can Gen Engine NOx&VOC Emission Eval 195,000 - 195,0D0 196,000 -
c.Komax Direct Steam Injection System 46.000 - 46,000 46.000 -
ded d.Plant 1 &2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 440,000 8,548 200,000 208.648 231,452
e.Plant Water Station Valve Upgrade 27,000 - 25,000 25.000 2.000
I.Upgrade Phone System 78,000 230,021 40,000 270,021 (192,021)
S.Proaeae-Related Special Projects
we a.H2O2 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 40,000 - 35.000 35,000 51000
Transfer to Project Below (39205) - - - (39,205)
1113O2 Continuous Monilor/Pretreatment Automa 39205 - - - 39,206
b.Prelim Corrosion Assmt Study for Collection 107,000 - 72.000 72,000 35,000
we e.Headworks Mein Sewer Pump Rehab 300,000 - 100,000 1D0,000 200.000
d.Headworks Scrubber Seal patent 10,000 - 10,000 10.000 -
a.Digesters Expansion Joint Replacement 75,000 - 75,000 75,000 -
f.KADY Process for Digester Performance Imam. 90,800 - 85,900 85,800 6,000
g.Real Pa Germans Foul Air WAD Trans.Coupli 32,000 - 32,000 32,000 -
aw, h.Cleafler Efficiency Improvements 1,700,000 - - - 1.700.000
I.Bab Phase Automation 175.000 - 40.000 40.000 136,000
j.Belt Press Drive Unit Replacement 50.000 - - - SO,000
k. P-2 Sludge Gander ReplecemenVRehab 224,000 - 180,000 18D,000 44,000
ar I. P-2 Sludge Line Expansion Joint ReaORahes 60.000 - 60,001) 60.000 -
m.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 686A00 58,476 416,000 473,476 211.524
n.Sufur Monitoring for Combustion 126,000 30,609 101,000 131.809 (5,809)
a.Upgrade Emission Modeling Teeing System 52.000 27,955 22,000 49.955 2.045
,r S.Miscellaneous
a.Replacement of Plant Process Equipment 1,760,000 - 60,000 80,000 1.68D.000
b.Miscellaneous Reliability&Redund.Projects 250,000 18.960 50,000 68.960 181.040
Transferee Projects Below (152,666) - - - (152.888)
Energy Deregulation Study 57,268 530 - 639 56.729
sw Pit 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 95,600 71,692 - 77,692 17.908
c.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 80.000 - 80,000 80,000
I.Securiy System Improvements 784,800 130.592 257,800 386,392 396,408
r✓ Sub-Total-Special Projects 32,566.135 11.065,284 11,265.540 22.330,824 10.235.311
Water Management Projects
a.Groundwater Replenishment System, J-36 121.925.000 641,012 775,000 1,316.012 120.608.968
b.Water Conservallon CooparalNe Projects 1.000.000 - 200,000 200,000 800.000
v✓ c.City lnfiltrationfinflow Cooperative Projects 205,100,000 100,000 i(XIA00 205,000,001)
Sub-Total-Water Management Projects 328,025,000 541.012 1,O75,000 1,616.012 326,408,9s8
Equipment lbms 44,124,000 2.111.161 2,000,000 4,111,1 s1 70 012,639
Total Treatment&chip osal Projects 890,845.682 105,043,937 31,304.870 136,348,507 764,497,075
r Construction in Progress Completed at 6130198 - 59,644,199 - 59,814,189 (59,6O4,199)
Projects To Be Identified in Strategic Plan 526.000,000 526,000,000
Taut Collections,Treatment and Disposal Projects 1.569.012.306 173,818,242 51,590.662 225.403,524 1.343.603,482
sr
cad
Section 3-Page 13
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
L
L
L
L
Li
V
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L.
IJ
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Section 3—Page 14
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
r For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
�+ Operating Budget Review
1998.99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
r Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53.99%
r Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 30,816,000 14,399,532 16,415,488 46.73%
Connection Fees 6,800,000 2,726,139 4,073,861 40.09%
IRWD Fees - - - -
Other Fees 73,795,000 33,296,624 40,498,376 45.12%
r Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50,000 -
Interest&Misc.Receipts 20,648,000 14,709,694 5,938,306 71.24%
Other - 468,492 (468,492) -
r Total Revenues 132,118,000 65,605,880 66,512,120 49.66%
OUTLAYS:
r Share of Joint Works Tmit Plant 49,284,000 12,416,712 36,867,288 25.19%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 22,904,000 6,643.689 16,260,311 29.01%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 30,444,000 20,976,834 9,467,166 68.90%
r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45,20D,DD0 20,272,351 24,927,549 44.85%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,279.500 2,965.216 6,314,284 31.95%
Total Outlays 157,111,500 63.274,802 93.536,596 40.27%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 34,705,356 6,643,689 (25,575,260) 15,773,795
Share of Joint Works 150,440,836 12,416,712 (7,406,143) 155,451,405
r Sub-Total 185,146,192 19,060,401 (32,981,393) 171,225,200
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
yy Land and Property Rights 2,675,266 - - 2,676,266
Collection Lines and Pump She. 307,096.988 (14,651.800) - 292,545,188
Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,922
Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528
r General Plant and Admin. Facil. 585,732 - - 885,732
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 674,866,556 (304,452) 7,406,143 681,968,247
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 79,646 (36,954) - 42,692
Sub-Total 985,715,638 (14,893,206) 7,406,143 978,228,575
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,170,861,830 4,167,195 (25,575,250) 1,149,453,775
r
r
Section 4-Page 1
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Revenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Operating Budget Review L
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended 6W
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Ony) - - - -
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,976,000 1,123,338 852,662 56.85%
Connection Fees 500.000 189,180 310,820 37.84%
Other Fees 7,764,000 3.262,703 4.501,297 42.02% 1 �
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - �r
Interest BMisc. Receipts 1,D41,000 757,955 283,045 72,81%
Other - 50,742 (50,742) -
Total Revenues 11.281.000 5,383,918 5,897.082 47.73%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt.Plant 5,431,000 1,355,906 4,075,094 24.97% Li
District Trunk Sewer Construction 87,000 - 87,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,958,000 2,675,732 1,282.268 67.60% '
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 6.040,000 2,173,196 2,886,804 43.12% l�
District Operating 8 Other Expenditures 593.000 244.388 348.612 41.21%
Total Outlays 15,109,000 6,449,222 8,659,778 42.68%
V
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance y
7/1/98 8 Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98
Construction in Progress - _ _ - jy
Share of Joint Works 16,428,139 1.355,906 - 17,784,045
Sub-Total 16,428,139 1,355,906 - 17784045
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: -
Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81.398
Collection Lines and Pump Sens. 8,903,000 - - 6.903.000
Treatment Facilities
Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 58,241 - - 58,241
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 73,837R97 (205,173) - 73,632,124
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - _ _
V
Sub-Total 80,891,529 (205.173) - 80,686,356
Total Property,Plant 8 Equipment&CIP 97,319,888 1,150,733 - 98,470,401
L,I
Section 4-Page 2 _
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Operating Budget Review
1997.98 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
- Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 9,575.000 4.706.926 4,868.074 49.16%
Connection Fees 2,500,000 557,077 1,912,923 23.48%
Other Fees 23,973.000 10,253,521 13,719,479 42.77%
_ Sale of Capacity Rights - - -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 5,958,000 4,304,786 1,653,214 72.25%
Other - 139.402 (139,402) -
Total Revenues 42,006, 0 19.991,712 22.014.288 47.59%
— OUTLAYS: 00
Share of Joint Works Trml Plant 14,624,000 3,634,372 10,889.628 25.02%
— District Trunk Sevrer Construction 2,131,000 622,074 1,508,926 29.19%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10.302,000 7,132,682 3,169,338 69.24%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 14,370,000 6,329,028 8,040,972 44.04%
r
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,775,OD0 846,610 1,928,390 30.51%
Total Outlays 44,102,000 18,554,746 25.537.254 4210%
�. Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98
— Construction in Progress 631.047 622,074 (295,825) 957,296 -
_ Share of Joint Works 44,034,032 3.634,372 - 47.668,404
Sub-Total 44,665,079 4,256,446 (295,825) 48,625,700
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
r Collection Lines and Pump Stuns. 97,076,157 (175,500) - 96,900.657
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172
,- General Plant and Admin. Facil. 218,549 - - 218.549
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 197,506,072 (141.440) - 197,364.632
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 14.089 (14,089) - -
- Sub-Total 295,365,733 (331,029) - 295,034,704
Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 340,030,812 3,925,417 (295,825) 343,880,404
Section 4-Page 3
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Revenue Area No. 3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date I
Budget Date Budget % Expended u
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - -
Tax AllocalionslSubventions(Share of 1%) 10,313,000 4,081,667 6,231,333 39.58% Ir
Connection Fees 1,800,000 903,383 896,617 50.19%
Other Fees 23,326,000 11,062,595 12,263,405 47A3%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - 1d
Interest&Misc.Receipts 6,888,000 4,828,911 2,059,089 70.11%
Other - 141,921 (141,921) - v
Total Revenues 42,327,000 21,018,477 21,308,523 49.66%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 14,923,D00 3,794,547 11,128,453 25.43%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 6,977,D00 3,003,970 3,973.030 43.06%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 9,469,000 6,420,187 3,048,813 67.80%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,085,0D0 6,055,351 7,029,649 46.28% L
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,365,000 600,752 1,764,248 25.40%
Total Outlays 46,819,000 19,874,807 26,944,193 42.45%
V
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131/98 1J
Construction in Progress 14,901,704 3,003,970 (11,181,867) 6,723,807
L
Share of Joint Works 45,974,719 3,794,547 - 49,769,266
Sub-Total 60,876,423 6,798,517 (11,181,867) 56,493,073
Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 74,414,552 (11,090,600) - 63,323,952
Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 320,153 - - 320,153
Equity in Joint Treatment Fact]. 206,177,386 (116,466) - 206,061,920
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. -
Sub-Total 281,230,663 (11,206,066) - 270,024,597
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 342,107,086 (4,407,549) (11,181,867) 326,517,670
�r
L
Section 4-Page 4
iV
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
r
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year To- Remaining Year-To-Date
` Budget Data Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
.n Tax Alkwallons/Subventicns(Sham of 1%) 2,612,000 1,353,829 1.258,171 51.83%
Connector,Fees 500,000 80,658 419,342 16.13%
Other Fees 2.730,000 1,296,708 1.433.292 47.50%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts 1,642,0D0 1,185,344 456.656 72A9%
Other - 18,715 (18,715) -
Total Revenues 7,484,000 3,935,254 3,548,746 52.58%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tmnt Plant 2,006,000 500,393 1,505,607 24.94%
` District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,079,0D0 1,130.371 2,948,629 27.71%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,789,0D0 1,322,484 466,516 73.92%
Share or Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,844,0110 812,921 1,031,079 44.08%
District Operating 8 Other Expenditures 864,500 289,432 575,068 33.48%
Total Outlays 10,582.500 4,055.601 6,526,899 38.32%
,�. Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711198 BAdditions Fixed Assets 12131198
r
Construction in Progress 1,861,682 1,130,371 (928.221) 2.063.832
Share of Joint Works 6,062,766 500,393 - 6,563,159
Sub-Total 7,924,448 1,630,764 (928,221) 8,626,991
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 8 EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69,740
Collection Lures and Pump Bins. 34,300,512 (109,500) - 34,191,012
Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 39,402 - - 39.402
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 27,219,658 (45,907) - 27,173,751
Other Asset:at Coat Less Amort. - - - -
r Sub-Total 61,643,774 (155,407) - 61,488,367
Total Property,Plant 8 Equipment 8 CIP 69.568,222 1,475,357 (928.221) 70,115,358
r
,.d
Section 4-Page 5
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
Revenue Area No. 6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review i
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Operating Budget Review v
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Vear•To-0ata
Budget Date Budget %Expended L
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - -
TaxAllocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,194,000 619,447 674,553 51.88% I
Connection Fees 100,000 14,200 85,800 14.20% No
Other Fees 3,686,000 1,831,390 1,754.610 51.07%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Imerest&Misc. Receipts 1,219,000 897,137 321,863 73.60%
Other - 17,699 (17,899) -
Total Revenues 6,099,000 3,379,873 2.719.127 55.42% 1
OUTLAYS: V
Share of Joint Works Tmit Plant 1,838,000 480,660 1,3T7,340 25.060%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 3,101.000 17,180 3.083.820 0.55%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,135,000 789,759 345,241 69.58% I I
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,550,000 786,567 763.433 50.75%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 226,500 105,419 121,081 46.54%
Total Outlays 7,85Q500 2.159.585 5,690.915 27.51% L
Capital Facilities Budget Review -
I
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance r
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98
Construction in Progress 3.192.091 17,180 (2,357.930) 851.341 LI
Share of Joint Works 5,581,355 460,660 - 6,042,015
Sub-Total 8,T73,446 477.840 (2,357,930) 6,893,356 'y
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562
Collector,Lines and Pump Sims. 5,157,361 (3,600) - 5.153,761 V
Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2,653
Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 113,761 - - 113.761
Equity in Joint Tnatrnem Facil. 24.911,510 104,569 - 25,016.079 V
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon - _ _ _
Sub-Total 30,193,241 100,969 - 30,294,210 i
V
Total Property,Plan&Equipment&CIP 38,966,687 578,809 (2,357,930) 37.187,566 _
Li
i
Li
L
Section 4 - Page 6
V
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dale
r Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
,r Tax ASocationsrSubventions(Share of l%) 2,980,000 1,458,385 1,521,615 48.94%
Connection Fees 500,000 452,612 47,388 90.62%
Other Fees 7,426,00D 2,983,943 4.442,057 40.18%
,r Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,593,000 1,024,303 568,697 64.30%
Other - 46,580 (46,580) -
r, Total Revenues 12,499,000 5,965,823 6,533,177 47.73%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 4,854,000 1.245,396 3,608,604 25.66%
r District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,065,000 1,204,659 2,860,341 29.63%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,974,000 1,411,832 562,168 71.52%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,714,000 2,066,753 2,648,247 43.82%
r District Operating&Other Expenditures 1,504,500 476,880 1,027,620 31.70%
Total Outlays 17,111,500 6,404,520 10,706,980 37.43%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711/98 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131/98
r Construction in Progress 4,361,999 1,204,659 (3,405,264) 2,161,394
Share of Joint Works 15,089,216 1,245,396 - 16,334,612
r Sub-Total 19,461,215 2,450,055 (3,405,264) 18,496,006
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: -
r Land and Property Rights 1,578,655 - - 1,578,655
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 41,514,588 (3,128.200) - 38,386,388
Treatment Facilities - - - -
,� General Plant and Admin. Facil. 98,197 - - 98,197
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 67,975,501 (344,491) - 67,631,010
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 65,557 (22,865) - 42,692
Sub-Total 111,243.280 (3,495,556) - 107,747,724
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 130.694.495 (1,045,501) (3,405,264) 126,243.730
r
Section 4- Page 7
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
� I
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended r
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53,99%
Tax Allocations/Subvenoons(Sham of l%) 2,165,000 1,055,940 1.109.060 48.77% I.i
Connection Fees 500,000 97,711 4OZ289 19.54%
Other Fees 4,164,000 2,108,322 2,055.678 50.63% 1 ,
Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50.000 -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,299,000 967,223 331.777 74.46%
Other - 32,349 (32,349) -
Total Revenues 8,188,000 4,266,944 3,921,056 52.11
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 3,470,000 861.720 2,608,280 24.83% 161
District Tnmk Sewer Construction 1,388,D00 157,948 1230,052 11.38%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,645.000 1,133.653 511,347 68.92% 1
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,938,000 1246,750 1,691,250 42.44% V
District Operating&Other Expenditures 715,500 331206 384,294 46.29%
Total Outlays 10,158,SW 3,731277 6,425,223 36.74%
Yr
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 1
7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131198 V
Construction in Progress 7,703,440 157,948 (7,406,143) 455,245 It
Ld
Share of Joint Works 10,440,594 861,720 (7,406,143) 3,896,171
Sub-Total 18,144,034 1,019,668 (14,812,286) 4,351,416 V
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Lard and Pmperty Rights 146,986 - - 146,986
Collection Lines and Pump Suns. 19,094,427 (44,400) - 19,050,027 LJ
Treatment Facilities - _ _ -
Disposal Faclities 3,053 - - 3,053
Generel Plant and Admin. Fact. 30,682 - - 30,682 IJ
Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 46,880,113 (84,667) 7,406,143 54,201,589
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - _ -
Sub-Total 66,155,261 (129,067) 7,406,143 73,432,337 �+
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 84,299,295 890,601 (7,406.143) 77,783,763
I '
U
L
Section 4-Page 8 J
L.I
-- Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
r
Operating Budget Review
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expanded
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
'� Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) - - - -
Connection Fees 400,000 401,318 (1,318) 100.33%
Other Fees 826,000 495,852 330,148 60.03%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 598,000 442,596 155.404 74.01%
Other - 5,294 (5,294) -
Total Revenues 1,824,000 1,345,060 478,940 73.74%
OUTLAYS:
r
Share of Joint Works Tent.Plant 562,000 141,651 420,449 25.19%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 144,000 - 144,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 19,000 13.153 5,847 69.23%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 506,000 241,241 264,759 47.68%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 24,000 2,559 21,441 10.66%
Total Outlays 1,255.000 398,504 856,496 31.75%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31198
r
Sham of Joint Works 1,715,026 141,551 - 1,856,577
Sub-Total 1,715,026 141,551 - 1,856,577
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 3,033,024 - - 3,033,824
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - -
`� Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 7,709,858 (22,159) - 7,687,699
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - -
„� Sub-Total 10,743,682 (22,159) - 10,721,523
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 12,458,708 119.392 - 12,578,100
r
Section 4-Page 9
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
II
Operating Budget Review W
1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year40-0ate i
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
TaxAllocations/Subventions(Share of l%) - - - - LI
IRWD Fees - - -Other Fees - 1,590 (1,590) -
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Misc. Receipts 410,000 301,439 108,561 73.52%
Other - 15,790 (15,790) -
Total Revenues 410,000 318,819 91,181 77.76% L
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,676.000 422,168 1,253,832 25.19% I
District Trunk Sewer Construction 932,000 507.487 424.513 54.45% U
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 153,000 77,372 75,628 50.57%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,153,000 561,544 591,456 48.70%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 211,500 67.970 143,530 32.14% I�
Total Outlays 4,125,500 1,636,541 2,488,959 39.67%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance j
7M198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31198 bl
Construction in Progress 2,053,393 507,487 - 2,560,880 1
L
Share of Joint Works 5,114,989 422,168 - 5,537.157
Sub-Total 7,168,382 929,655 - 8,098,037 1
V
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 8 EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collecdon Lines and Pump Stns. 25,602,567 - - 25,602,567 LI
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6,747 - - 6,747 Li
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 22,639,161 550.282 - 23,189,443
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - -
Sub-Total 48,248,475 550,282 - 48,798,757 y
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 55,416,857 1,479,937 - 56.896,794
V
W
Section 4-Page 10
L
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998
Percent of
r Actual Budget Remaining Actual
1996A9 Through Through 1998-99 Through increase
Budget 1213198 12/31198 Budget 1213197 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves' 2,609,160 2,059,473 2,494,793 (435,320)
r Revenues
2. In•Liau Premiums - - - - - -
r 3. beerestBurstellaneous 135.000 67.392 49.92% 67,6W 56.483 10,909
4. Reimbursements from Other Funds 160,000 283.258 177.04% (123.258) 209,726 73,632
5. Total Revenues 295,000 350,650 118.88% (SS,BW) 268,219 84,441
r
Expenses
r 6. Salaries,Wages and Benefit 4,500 - 4.500 - -
7. Benefits/Claims 130,000 329,973 253.83% (199,973) 241,955 88,018
.+ S. Contractual Services 5,000 1A94 27.88% 3,606 4,262 (2,968)
9. Legal Sernoes 300,000 218,574 72.86% 81,426 172,532 48,042
�r 10. Professional Services 5,000 1,068 21.35% 3.932 - 1,068
11. Supplies&Omer Soo - 500 -
r 12. Sub-Total Expenses 445,000 551,009 375.92% (106,009) 418,749 1322SO
13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 55.746 46.4e% 64254 60,936 (5,190)
14. Total Expenses 565,000 806,755 107.38% (41,755) 479,885 127,070
r
15. Excess Funniness(Expenses) (270,000) (266,105) 94.85% (13,895) (213,476) (42.629)
18. Ending Reserves` 2,339,180 1,803,366 77.09% 535,792 2281,317 (477,949)
.r
•Includes$687,300 long term receivable due from the County of Orange.
r
Section 5-Page 1
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 �•I
percerd
Actual of Budget Remaining Aural L
1996-99 Through Through 1998-99 Through Increase
Budget 17/31/98 17/31199 Budget 1201197 (Decrease) i
U
1. Beginning Reserves* 659,609 563,272 685,621 (102,349)
Revenues y
2. In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 109.500 48.67% 115,500 107.180 2,320
3. Interest 8 Miscellaneous 35.000 17,603 50.29% 17,397 14,306 3,297 �+
4. Total Revenues 260,000 127,103 48.89% 132,897 121,486 5,617
U
Expenses Y
5. Salaries, Wages and Benefits - - - - - -
6. BenefnslClaims 250,000 106,571 42.63% 143,429 90,977 15,594 V1
7. Contractual Services 25.000 - 25,0W 12,500 (12,530)
8. Legal Services 5,000 9,671 193.42% (4,671) - 9,671 �+
9. Professional Services 30,000 - 30,000 - -
10. Supplies 8 Other - - - - 583 (583)
11. Sub-Total Expenses 310,000 116,242 37.50% 193,758 104.060 12,182
12, Excess Loss Policy 25,000 10,860 43.44% 14,140 10,554 306 �
13. Total Expenses 335.000 127,102 37.94% 207,898 114,614 14488 L
I
Id
14. Excess Revenue (Expenses) (75,000) 1 - (75,001) 6,872 (6,871) L.I
L
15. Ending Reserves' 584,609 563,273 96.35% (75,001) 672,493 (109,220)
Ir
Includes $139,231 long term receivable due from the County of Orange.
it
Section 5-Page 2
L
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
r General Management Administration(Division 110)
Paulo mtance Objective 1998-09 Performance
Target Through Mid-fear Summary of Data
Ensure treatment cost does $486/MG $449/MG Costs below Gallonage charge due to lower
not exceed target by end of than anticipated expenditures through mid-
- fiscal year year.
Ensure District meets 521.5 FTEs by 515.25 FTEs Target currently met
,r adopted five year staffing end of fiscal year
plan
Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
r with Permit Compliance
Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 26.4% Expenditures well under target through mid-
CORF Budget by end of year. See Engineering Section.
year
Ensure District Performance 80% 85%Performance Performance objectives have been met for the
Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives(in 2nd qtr) 2nd quarter. Workplan milestone tasks ere
milestones met within Objectives 72%Workplan slightly behind, largely due to unanticipated
targets 80%Workplan Milestones(through Y2K efforts. Note that with GM approval,
Milestones mid-year) some scheduled workplan tasks can be
— delayed to a subsequent quarter given
appropriate justfica6on.
DiWcts-Wlda Not
r Workplan Tasks Complete BN1ind Started Summary of Daft
Through Mid-Year
186 134 34 8 72%of workplan tasks that were scheduled
(and not delayed with GM approval)were
completed.
NOTE: The General Manager approved some 1"Quarter Workplan tasks for delay. These do not appear in the
above table. Approval requires staff to specify valid reasons for project delay to a subsequent quarter.
.d
r
r
r
Section 6-Page 1
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Administration (Division 210)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance j
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data �J
Average Annualized Rate 6% 6A4% The portfolios(long/short tens and cash flow
of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective ILI'
benchmarks. Figures based on current yield
calculations.
Average Interest Rate 4% 2.90% 1%is equivalent to approximately$1.7M annuaill L
Paid on Certificate of in interest savings based on variable rate COPS
Participation(COP) that are not protected by a long-term interest ran -
Borrowing exchange agreement. I
Ensure 100%of insurance LI
programs renewed on Fees al/below 100%renewals met at Premium costs and brokerage fees were reduce
schedule and FY'98 targets less than$90K from prior fiscal year.
commissions/(ees NTE y
$90,000
Remain at or under the net $45.2 Million by $20.2 million through 6 Expenses are being controlled well. Despite on
Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal months(45%total) time costs recorded in the first quarter,we are o u
year an 89%budget pace.
4
Workplan Tasks I
Second quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data L
7 4 3 0 Implementation of various studies behind
schedule due to unanticipated delays or
additional focus on FIS implementation L
completion.
L
L
L
L
Ll
LI
I
u
Section 8-Page 2 1
L
Performance Objectives
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Accounting (Division 220(
Performance Objective 1998.99 Target Performance
Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Issue monthly financial Due to end-of-year closings, July's
reports within ithin 10 working 92% 83% distrib was
s delayed. 5 of 6 months
days have been delivered on-time.
Develop FIS OneWond 90%trained by 15% Internal Accounting staff trained. Other
r Training program year end staff training scheduled for 4th quarter.
Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 90% Study to be completed early by 1199.
study
r
r Worliplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behlnd Started Summary of Data
- 3 2 1 0 Operational Review of Finance by
consultants behind scheduled completion.
• Section 6- Page 3
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Purchasing 8 Warehousing (Division 230)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Summary of Data I
Target Through Mid-Year 61
Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 98.11% 2nd Quarter cycle counting pregram met
program Rating benchmark target.
u
Complete by Research Stage Project may be delayed due to a retirement
JIT Inventory Contract 2/99 and re-assignment of staff to Y2K program.
Plant 1 Sarcoding System Complete by Research Stage Products have been demonstrated and staff V
3199 is reviewing findings. Y2K program is
impacting limey completion of this task.
Implement Procurement Complete by PrepaLStageApplication with AMEX forwarded.Card Program 3/99Develop Quick Reference Complete by Project cunenlly on hold clue to Y2K
Guide 3/98 program.
u
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
RFP process for barcode system behind
4 3 1 0 schedule. 1
L
IL
Y
L
u
L
Section 6-Page 4
U
Performance Objectives
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT
Communications (Division 310)
Performance Objective 1998.99 Performance
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Daft
Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target met.
Turnaround Time 100%of time
r Board Minute Prepara0on 10 day 67% Minute's turnaround was delayed in
Turnaround Time turnaround 100% September and December due to vacation.
r of time
Employee Satisfaction 3.0 scare N/A This survey will be conducted in the 3rd
Rating (Communications quarter.
r Audit)
Photocopying Services 93%• 96% Benchmark target exceeded.
Satisfaction
Graphics Services 95%+ L00% Benchmark target exceeded.
r Satisfaction
Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%- 185 visitors have toured the plants during the
Rating 2nd quarter.
r Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter complete Behind Sttrted Summary of Daft
— 4 3 1 0 Documentation of Webmaster policy and
procedures behind schedule.
r
r
r
r Section 6 - Page 5
1998-99 Mid-Year Report u
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 41 0/42 014 3 0')
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance I
Through Mid-Year Summary of Data 64
Establish Cooperative 100%by year-end Implementation Stage Basic parameters and review committee
Projects Program established. Proposals due 129. Ld
Ensure Department budget 95-A-100% 93.6%(annualized) Target currently met. Expenditures tracking
managed to within 95%- below target. I
100%of approved funding V
Ensure Department 90% Pending Will be fully reported in 4111 quarter.
achieves 90%+of budget
performance objectives u
Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 92% Target met.
Pump Stations meets or
exceeds target L
Ensure that collections 90%+spots 89% Trouble spot performance slightly missed due V
trouble spots are cleaned on to holiday schedule and personnel leave.
maintained on schedule schedule
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 78% Target met.
Fleet Maintenance Division u
meets or exceeds target
Ensure planned/preventive 75% Planned& 71% Preventive Approaches targeted benchmarks.
maintenance to corrective Preventive 29%Corective
maintenance ratios meets Maintenance
targets 25%Corective
Maintenance
Workplan Tasks Not L
Second Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Dale
6 4 2 0 Lack of clenral assistance delayed completion L
of standardized reporting tools for weld/re-
build shop and contractor performance
indicators.
*Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined this L
quarter for reporting purposes.
L
L
L
L
Section 6- Page 6 f
W
Performance Objectives
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 5101520•)
Performance Objective 199899 Performance
,r Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Percentage of supervisor 20.5%by year's 24% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains
salaries to total does not end below private sector average but does not
` exceed 20.5% yet achieve benchmark.
(private sector=25%)
- HR Department managed 9D-100%of 28% expended through This is trending well below end-of-year
within budget budget 6 months. target largely due to training budget
encumbered but not debited.
,r Achieve 5-year staffing plan 521.5 FTE's by 515.25 FFE's through This is below our end-of-year target.
projectors year's end quarter
Ensure Department 90% WA Complete data will be fully reported in 4th
— achieves 90%+of budget quarter.
performance objectives
*Ensure staff receive all 95% by year's 98%through 2nd Target should continue to be met through
` mandatory training and quarter the conclusion of 4th quarter.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter comp/e0e BMhtd1 ffiarla�d Summary of Data
3 3 0 0 Wori#m tasks completed.
*Note that Human ResaaCes and Training Divisions have been combined for this quarter's reporting purposes.
r
Section 6- Page 7
1998-99 Mid-Year Report u
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Safety & Emergency Response (Division 530)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Perfomurnce
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data W
Resolve Service Requests 90% of time 98% Customer Service remains a division
within 2 work days priority. This also represents a significant
improvement over last two years'objectives
of a 75%15 day turnaround and 90%f3day
turnaround, respectively.
W
Ensure Injury Incidences 7.6 incidence 4.5 The objective is well below industry
45%below industry rate standards.
average
Lost Work Day Case 3.8 incidence 1.9 Target has been met and is significantly
Incidence Rate 50% below rate lower than established benchmark.
industry average
Lr
Workers Compensation $403 S52 Costs were negligible the first half of the
Cost Factor 30% below fiscal year due to negligible medical costs
industry average for those few injuries occurring.
L
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
5 5 0 0 Workplan tasks mrnpleted. L
1 !
L
L
L
L
LL
L
L
LL
Section 6-Pap 8
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620)
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance
r Through Mid- Summary of Data
Year
Conduct all Core ocean 100%of time 100% Target met.
monitoring sampling within
NPDES parameters
Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100% Deadlines 100% All regulatory deadlines met.
and complete associated
reports
r Distribute high priority 80%Within 7 day 100% Target met.
legislation Information to turnaround
appropriate staff with 7
working days
r
Ensure 100%spill Incidents 100%within 5 days 100% Target met.
reported within 5 working
days.
r
r Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind St~ Summary of Date
�+ 1 1 0 0 WorkPlan tasks oompleted.
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section 6-Page 9
r
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Sciences Laboratory(Division 630) L
Performance Objective 1998A9 Performance
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data �I
Maintain monthly sample Within 10% of <10% Target met.
analyses within"productive multi-agency
range benchmark v
Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 97%on 1st analysis Target met.
on laboratory samples 1st amaysts;
100-A on 2nd
Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of November—88% Internal standards established in November, i
analyses established December—82% '98. Turnaround times approaching targeted u
norm parameters.
Y
Wo"W Taslm Not I
Second puarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data V
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Y
li
V
LI
I�
4
� i
bl
V
1 �
V
Section 6-Page 10
L
Performance Objectives
.. TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source Control (Division 640)
„y Performance Objective 1998-N Performance
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Maintain field inspection 2.5 mondonng 2.6 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note,
r productivity events/day however, that due to data collection methods
data is for 1st quarter of FY 98/99.
Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal.
actions within 30 days of
non-compliance event
.. Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal.
permits prior to expiration
FRevise and develop'ocal Complete 100% Project on-going 100%of scheduled tasks to-date are
limits for pollutants of of project by end complete.
con con
of year
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 1 1 0 Behind schedule an field productivity
testing.
r
r Section 6- Page 11
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L
(Division 7101720')
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance L
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Manage Engineering CORF 8D%- 25.4% Due to unanticipated project delays and other L
V
Budget expended by issues related to internal reporting,finalizing
year's end contracts,etc., less has been expended than
anticipated.
V
Bid construction projects on 80%-of time 75% Three out of four projects bid on schedule.
established Capital
Improvement Program
schedule Lit
Meet design project 80%.of time 84% Target met. 2125 milestones either met or
milestones officially moved due to increased project L
smile.
Meet 9004 of project Complete 1DD% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule,
milestones for Strategic Plan project by 3W milestones have been met. L
Respond to environmental 100%of time 10D% The District has responded to all inquiries
correspondence within 30 within 30 days.
working days V
L
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
10 6 4 0 Behind schedule on project management
training tasks and others largely due to
unanticipated Y2K efforts.
'Note that Engineering Admn. and Planning 8 Design Division have been combined for this quarters reporting
purposes.
L
I
ICI
L
L
L
Section 6- Page 12
L
Performance Objectives
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Construction Management(Division 730)
r Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through Mid Year
Target Change Order costs 5% 3.53% Change order Posts are ahvays based on a
at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four
original contract amount quarters. Target has been met.
(industry standard=7.25%)
- Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 80%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is aways based on a
Occupancy in facilities days 20%-240 days mooing average of the preceding four
within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target has been met.
r days
Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 2.62% Target has been met based on QC
Inspections and average no inspections.
r more 10%correctable
deficiencies
Conduct submittal reviews 80%of dme or 79% Near target. One contract had 46
within 20 days greater submittals that caused some delays.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 t 1 0 Behind schedule on written submhtal policy
and procedures.
r
Section 6 - Page 13
1998-99 Mid-Year Report 6.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L
O&M Administration (Division 810)
L
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
L
Ensure Operations $312/million $297/million gallons Target met.
treatment cost per million gallons treated treated
gallons does not exceed
target L
Ensure Total Injury 12.2 5.01 Target met.
Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) II
more below industry
average
Ensure Frne ear staffing 2D9.25 FfEs b 211.25 FTEs Due to dela I y g y ys in plant automation projects
plan figures are met end of year (,142)this number may be revisited in the
forthcoming 4-year staffing plan. However,
we are close to target.
L
11
Workplan Tasks Not V
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
N/A N/A N/A N/A - r
L
L
L
L
I '
r
L
U
L
Section 6-Page 14 I 1
y
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Operations& Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 8201870)
r
Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance
Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
r
Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100%wahin Total contracts On target.
blosolids and oxygen budget managed are at 43.9%
contracts are managed of budget(87.8%
.. within budget annualized)
Ensure Capital Outlay 80%.of time -80% Project milestones met.
Revolving Fund (CORF)
project milestones are met
Respond to trouble- 80%i 100% Target met,
shooting and service
requests by established
priority time frames
r Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.43 Target met.
kilowatt hour($/kWh)
'Maintain therms/kWh at .111Merms/kWh .109therms/kWh-Plant Within targeted parameters.
r Central Generation plants -Plant 1 1
(kilowatt hour)within .106 thermslkWh .108 therms/kWh-Plant
targeted limits -Plant 2 2
r 'Maintain FERC efficiency 42%or greater 65% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit
at Central Generation plants requirements thus gaining favorable natural
within targeted limits gas transmission rates.
r
r Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 3 0 0 Workplan tasks complete.
r
'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes.
r
r
r
Section 6-Page 15
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT t✓
O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 8301840)
lw i
Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance
Through Mid- Summary of Data
Year
Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 77% Plant 1 Target met.
Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 73%Plant 2
Process
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 54%Plant 1 Primary basin rehab project
(BOD)Removal Targets in Primary and Plant 2 41%Plant 2 impacted P2 numbers although
Treatment Process final effluent within norms. L
Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25% (1 hour 6.75%Plant 1 Overtime much lower than
total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 15%Plant 2 benchmark due to light training
targets hours leave taken) schedule and transfer of Sr. L•
Plant Operator to P1 night shift.
Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.5%Plant 1 See above. u
does not exceed targets salary 2.3%Plant 2
L
Worlplan Tads Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data L
4 3 1 0 Elements of elective training
program started but not
completed. L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Section 6-Page 18
L
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860)
Performance Objec#ve 1998-99 Target Performance
Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Ensure 47.5%Wrench Time 47.5% 53% Target met.
in Mechanical Maintenance
r Division
Ensure 47.5%Wrench Time 47.5% 44.5% Increased capital project commitments and
in Electrical& DART implementation impacts wrench time
Instrumentation Division completion.
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 66%
r Time/Direct Support Time in Target met.
Mechanical Maintenance
Division
Ensure 60%Wrench 6D% 60.5% Target met.
Time/Direct Support Time in
Electrical& Instrumentation
Division
Ensure preventive <100% 61% As maintenance tasks are rescheduled with
maintenance back"in improved maintenance intervals, backlogs
Mechanical Maintenance is will confine to fluctuate widely from quarter
less than 1D0% to quarter. This program should be
completed over the next year.
r Ensure preventive <100% 116% See above.
maintenance backlog in
Electrical&Instrumentation
is less than 100%
r
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
6 5 1 0 Development of some procedures behind
schedule.
Section 6- Page 17
1998-99 Mid-Year Report
L'
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L
Air Quality & Special Projects(Division 880)
Performance Objective 1998.99 Pedormanee Through U
Target 8Rd-Year Summary of Data
Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target.
deadlines
Complete approved 80%+projects 2 of 9 completed Target met.
research projects including completed by 4 of 9 improgress L
project planning,design and year's end 3 of 9 in planning
field investigation
L
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind St~ Summary of Data L�
13 8 2 3 Some projects delayed largely due to many I 1
factors external to the division, u
L
u
L
L
L
L
U
L
L
Section S-Page 18
L
Performance Objectives
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
r (Divisions 920/930/940/950')
Performance Objective 1998•99 Performance
r Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data
Resolve all help desk calls 80%+within 5 78.1% Approaches benchmark target.
r
days
Ensure limited radio-system Less than .5% 0.12% Target met.
outages
r Meet Capital Outlay 85%+Div 930 100% Target met.
Revolving Fund(CORF) 75%+Div 940 76%
project milestones by due
date
Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 99.31% Target met.
'Up-time
r
Maintain Database'Up. 95%+ 99.2% Target met.
0me
Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100% Target met.
-Up-time' plants
Workplan Tasks Not
r Second Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
8 3 4 1 Y2K project has significantly impacted
r
progress on various other activities.
'Note that Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined this quarter for
reporting purposes.
r
r
r
r
Section 6-Page 19
1998-99 Mid-Year Report L
u
li
u
L
L
L
L
L
u
This Page Left Intentionally Blank Ir
I '
u
L
L
L
L
L
L
u
Section 6- Page 20
y
Orange County Sanitation District
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
OCSD 2/I/99