Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-24 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT February 17, 1999 phone: 0141962-2411 ,n.Iling address: NOTICE OF MEETING RD. eo.e127 °°nezi2a-812 BOARD OF DIRECTORS street address: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Joe44 eks Aaenu. Faontem Valle,G 92J08-J016 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1999 - 6:30 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue rai Aug_ies Fountain Valley, California 92708 • clue. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Ananarm Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. area Buena Perk Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beech Irvine //K Le Habra La Palma B rd Secret ft Lee Alamitos Newport Reach Grange Placentia Santa Ana Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Seal Beach S amen Tustin Vlle Perk STEERING COMMITTEE/EMT yorbe unda RETREAT - Saturday, February 20, 1999 at 9:00 a.m. euunty of orange STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. sanitary Districts OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND Coate mesa TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 3, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. Midway City Water Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND Ir�rne Pn h CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, March 4, 1999 at 5:30 P.M. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 10, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE GWR SYSTEM - Tuesday, March 23, 1999 at 5:30 P.M. STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC COMMITTEE Re STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, March 24, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. �o vrorect ma s'unlu:Naoun end mo❑vmron„wn, Excellence m Wastewater bysmrns' BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meetina March March 24, 1999 April April28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July `July21, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November "November 17, 1999 December 'December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 February February 23, 2000 March March 22, 2000 `Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 2/24/99 TIME: 6:30 P.M. (SIMONIAN) ....................ANDERSON................... �L — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................�L ✓ — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ (COOK) ............................ COLLINS....................... _G — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... �L ✓ — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................�/_ ✓ — — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... � — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. i ✓ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... L ✓ — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................' — (WISNER)......................... GULLIXSON................... � ai — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................J� /1 fulmie� (MARSHALL).................... MAULLER..................... 1� ✓ — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... _ ✓ — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. �_ ✓ — (WALKER)........................ MINER-BRADFORD........ i ✓ — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... i ✓ — (EVANS)........................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ �� — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ v ✓ — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ — — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... �L — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SPITZER....................... ai r — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... � ✓ — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... — STAFF: VOL, Anderson ✓ �Kep d li Hog G Hod es ✓ Kyle ✓ McIntyre Miles ✓ Ooten ✓ Petennan / Streed Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: G Woodruff ✓ Andrus 0=4/99 %VadonWaWl lwp.dteledmin%BSMlRECTORTlrect=Ron Call.dm SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING February 24, 1999-6:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. '.. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: a. Authorizing consideration of Item 19(b)and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. Verbal report of General Counsel C. Authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed for an existing sewer easement located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and a subsidiary of Unocal Corporation, in a form approved by General Counsel. H:\wp.dlaragendasoard AgendaMl999 Board AgendaMM499supplemenlal.doc SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING February 24, 1999—6:30 p.m. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 19. Authorize the General Manger to execute a quitclaim deed for an existing sewer easement located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-2, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and a subsidiary of Unocal Corporation, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY The Board of Directors authorized the General Manager to quitclaim three existing sewer easements on the site of the former Imperial Golf Course in the City of Fullerton at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on January 27, 1999. Subsequent to that meeting and prior to the City of Fullerton recording Tract Map No. 15773, Cal Pac Remediation Company discovered that another easement exists, granted to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County in 1993, encumbering the development for Tract Map No. 15773. Cal Pac needs to have this addition easement quitclaimed to them. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT Not Applicable CFW:jak H:\wp.dtMagendM8oard Agenda Reports\1999 Board Agenda RepodsWgWern IgAoo BEFORE THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH APPEALS BOARD DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In The Matter of the Appeal of: ) DOCKETS 94-R3D1-1205 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ) through 1208 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) P.O. Box 8127 ) 10844 Ellis Avenue ) Fountain Valley, California 92708 ) TRANSMITTAL EMPLOYER ) 1 The attached Decision was issued on the date indicated therein. If you are dissatisfied with the Decision, you have thirty (30) days from the date of service of the Decision in which to petition for reconsideration. The petition for reconsideration must be sent to: Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board 1300 "I" Street, Suite 940 Sacramento, California 95814 Your petition for reconsideration must fully comply with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 6616, 6617, 6618, and 6619 and with Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 390.1. For further information, call: (916) 322-5080. OSHAB 20 (9/88) BEFORE THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH APPEALS BOARD DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Appeal of: DOCKETS 94-R3131-1205 through 1208 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. Box 8127 DECISION 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Employer Background and Jurisdictional Information County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California (Employer) is a combination of nine agencies who jointly own a waste treatment plant. At the time the citations were issued; Employer was installing a diversion gate valve in a concrete channel to transport wastewater. From February 2 through May 10, 1994, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (the Division), through William Loupe, Cal/OSHA Associate Engineer-Compliance, conducted an accident investigation at a place of employment maintained by Employer at 22212 Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach, California (the site). On May 13, 1994, the Division cited Employer for the following alleged violations of the occupational safety and health standards and orders found in Title 8, California Code of Regulations': Citation Section Violation Penal 1 5157(c)(2) Serious $ 02 [failure to post danger signs] 2 5157(c)(8)(A) Serious $ 0 [permit space notification] 3 5157(c)(8)(B) Serious $ 0 [hazard notification] Unless otherwise specified, all references are to Sections of Title 8, California Code of Regulations. ' No civil penalty was proposed as Employer is a public entity. 4 5157(c)(8)(C) Serious $ 0 (precautions notification] Employer has filed timely appeals contesting the existence of the alleged violations. This matter came on regularly for hearing before Ashaki A. Hesson, Administrative Law Judge for the California OccupationalSafety and Health Appeals Board, at San Bernardino, California, on January 22, 1997, at 1:00 p.m. Employer was represented by Thomas F. Nixon, Attorney. The Division of Occupational Safety and Health (the Division) was represented by Leonard Strom, Staff Counsel. Oral and documentary evidence was introduced by the parties and the matter was submitted on January 28, 1999. Dockets 94-R3D1-1205 through 1208 Law and Motion The parties stipulated to the following statement of facts: 1. Prior to February 1, 1994, the County of Sanitation Districts Orange County, California ("Districts") contracted with an engineering construction firm, Pascal & Ludwig Engineers ("Pascal & Ludwig") .to perform a construction operation at the Districts' wastewater treatment facilities located in Huntington Beach, California. The construction operation involved the installation of a large diversion gate, known as a butterfly valve, in a concrete channel for transporting wastewater influent (hereinafter referred to as the "channel"). The diversion gate is a permanent structure in the channel. (A copy of the plans have been attached as Exhibit 1) No employees, of the Districts were involved in the ,construction operations except for inspection and operations except for inspection and oversight for specification compliance. 2. The channel, which is open air down its entire length of over 500 feet, is approximately 7 feet wide and 7 feet deep with a 3-4 foot top opening for access. During normal operations, partially treated wastewater flows through this channel into a clarifier as part of the wastewater treatment process. This channel qualifies as a confined space subject to certain provisions of Article 108 of Title 8, California Code of Regulations. 3. Upon commencement of the construction operation, the influent channel was drained of nearly all wastewater and sludge (approximately 3. inches in depth remaining except for the actual work area which was 2 dry). The influent channel was drained solely for the construction ` operation. While Pascal & Ludwig employees were lowering the gate into place, they determined that the gate would not quite fit into the channel. In order to accomplish the necessary installation, the contractor's employees proceeded to use a pneumatic hammer, connected to an air hose, to chip away and widen the concrete vertical walls of the channel in order to slije the gate into place. 4. On February 1, 1994 during the course of this operation, a fire occurred in the channel ("the channel"). The fire caused fatal injuries to two Pascal & Ludwig employees and injured another of its employees. 5. The incident occurred during the course of a construction operation as defined and regulated by Title 8, California Code of Regulations, § 1502. Division Investigation of the Incident 6. Following the February 1, 1994 incident, the Division initiated an accident investigation. At the outset, Division employee William Loupe, who was in charge of the investigation, represented to the Districts that Pascal & Ludwig, not the Districts, was the subject of the investigation. 7. In early May 1994, Mr. Loupe informed Districts' Staff for the first time that the Division intended to issue citations to the Districts. 8. Mr. Loupe indicated to Districts' Staff that there had risen a difference of opinion at the Division as to the applicability of Title 8, California Code of Regulations, ("CCR") Section 5157 to the Districts and that the Division had recently decided to issue citations to both Pascal & Ludwig and the Districts. 9. The Division's investigation led to the preparation of two reports, one relating to Pascal & Ludwig (Ex.4) and the other relating to the Districts (Ex.3). In its report relating to Pascal & Ludwig, the Division noted as follows: confine (sic) space operations, Section 5158 will govern this operation. NOTE: This employer is exempt from the entry requirement 5157." (Ex. 4, p. 5) 10. The report stated that the reason that § 5157 did not apply is that "[ajny construction contractors are exempted from the permit .requirement (per § 5156)." (Ex. 4, p. 5). 3 11. On May 13, 1994, the Division issued citations to Pascal Ss Ludwig for'violation of the following CAL OSHA regulations: § 5158(c)(1)(A) Employer failed to implement any written understandable operating and rescue procedures prior to entry into a confined space. § 5158(d)(3) Employer failed to require testing of the air with an appropriate device or method to determine whether dangerous air contamination and/or an oxygen deficiency existed. § 5158(d)(8) Employer failed to prohibit a source of ignition into a confined space until the implementation of appropriate provisions of this section have ensured that dangerous air contamination does not exist. § 1675 6) Employer failed to require that a step ladder in use be tied, blocked, or otherwise secured to prevent it from being displaced. 12. On May 13, 1994,-the Division also issued citations to the districts asserting violations of§ 5157 as follows: § 5157(c)(2) Employer failed to inform employees, by posting danger signs of by any other means, of the existence and location of any danger posed by the permit space. § 5157(c)(8)(A) Host Employer failed to inform the contractor that the work place contains permit spaces and that the entry is allowed only through compliance with a permit space program. § 5157(c)(8)(B) Host employer failed to apprise the contractor of the elements, including the hazards identified and the host's experience with the space, that makes the space in question a permit space. § 5157(c)(8)(B) Host employer failed to apprise the contractor of any precautions or procedures that the host employer has implemented for the protection of 4 employees in or near perms aces where contractor's employees will be working I 13. California's permit-required confined space regulations (Title 8, CCR §§ 5156, 5157 and 5158) were adopted and became effective approximately one month before the incident occurred. These regulations are based on and are virtually identical to the permit required confined space regulations established by the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration("Fed-OSHA"). 14. The Districts agree that § 5157 applies to Districts except when the Districts engage contractors to perform construction in confined spaces as defined in Article 108. 15 Section 5158 applies to construction .employees of a contractor working on a host employer's site. 16. The parties also stipulate to the introduction of the following documents into evidence: 1. Plans for construction project 2. Division Reports re Pascal & Ludwig 3. Division Reports re County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 4. Citation to Pascal & Ludwig 5. Citation to the Districts 6. State Regulations: Title 8, CCR § 5156, 5157, 5158 7. 29 CFR Parts 1910: Permit-Required Confined Spaces for General Industry; Final Rule (Federal Register, pages 4462- 4563) (January 14, 1993) �At the hearing, the parties submitted the following issue for determination: 1. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ("Districts" assert that § 5157 did not apply to the Districts at the time of the February 1, 1994 accident because Pascal & Ludwig was the "employer" performing construction work, i.e., the "host employer" requirements specified in § 5157 did not apply to Pascal & Ludwig. While this citation refers to § 5157(c)(8)(B), the statement of the alleged violation set forth in the citation tracks the language in § 5157(c)(8)(C). 5 ' 2. The Division of Occupational Safety and Health ("Division") asserts that § 5157 did apply to the districts at the time of February 1, 1994 accident because it was a host employer. Stipulations The parties stipulated to the facts set out above, leaving in issue only whether the confined space requirements of§ 5157 applied to "Host" Employer, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California on the day of the accident. The permit-required confined space requirements of§ 5157 apply to confined space activities, except as specifically excluded under § 5156(b)(2). § 5156(b)(2) specifically excludes construction operations, as in the instant case, where employees of Employer Pascal & Ludwig. Engineers were performing work under the direct supervision of Employer. Findings and Reasons for Decision The confined space requirement of § 5157 are inapplicable to host employer of a construction operation. Violations of §§ 5157(c)(2), 5157(c)(8)(A), 5157(c)(8)(B), 5157(c)(8)(C) were not established. Employer was cited under § 5157, which provides in pertinent part that: Section 5157 Permit-Required Confined Spaces. (a) Scope and application. This section contains requirements for practices and procedures to protect employees from the hazards of entry into permit- required confined spaces. This section applies to employers as specified in Section 5156(b)(1). § 5156. Scope, Application and Definitions. (a) Scope. This Article prescribes minimum standards for preventing employee exposure to confined space hazards, as defined by Section 5156(b), within such spaces as silos, tanks vats, vessels, boilers, compartments, ducts, sewers, pipelines, vaults, bins, tubs, and pits. (b) Application and definition. 6 (1) For operations and industries not identified in subsection (b)(2), the confined space definition along with other definitions and requirements of Section 5157, Permit-Required Confined Spaces shall apply. (2) The confined space definition along with other definitions and requirements of section 5155. Other Confined Space Operations shall apply to: (A) Construction operations regulated by section 1502; It is undisputed that the installation of the diversion gate or butterfly valve, in the influent water channel was a construction project. It is also undisputed that the Host Employer had no employees at the cite as all work was being performed by the engineering construction firm. § 5156(b)(2)4 specifically excludes construction operations, from the purview of§ 5157. Clearly the language of § 5157 is ambiguous. However, the uncertainty should be resolved by the Standards Board. The Division should not have the insurmountable responsibility of attempting to make Host Employers come within the confines of the cited section and once it does, Host Employers ought not then have to fight their way out. § 5157 does not apply to the work activity being performed on the day of the accident. Hence, Employer's appeal is granted and the citations are set aside. Decision It is hereby ordered that the citations are established, modified, or withdrawn as indicated above and set forth in the attached Summary Table. • It is further ordered that the final penalties assessed for each citation, as well as any terms governing the permissible period for payment of the final penalties, are indicated above and set forth in the attached Summary Table. ASHAKI A. HESSON Administrative Law Judge Dated: February 4, 1999 AAH:mI ' The California confined space regulations are closely patterned after the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Fed-OSHA) confined space regulation (§ 1910.146(a)) which "explicitly excludes agricultural, construction, and shipyard employment from the scope of the standard." [emphasis added] 7 SUMMARY TABLE DECISION Abbreviation Key: In the Matter of the Appeal of: Rcg=Regulatory County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California G=General W=Willful Dockets 94-R3D1-1205 through 1208 S=Serious R=Repeat Er=Employer Dosh=Division IMIS No.119994534 C A V DOCKET I I SECI'ION T F A PENALfY PENALTY FINAL T T Y MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL F C PROPOSED PROPOSED PENALTY A E P I A BY DOSH BY DOSI-1 ASSESSED T M E R T IN AT BY BOARD I E D CITATION HEARING O D N 94-R3D1-1205 1 5157c 2 S ALJ set aside. X $0 $0 $0 94-R3D1-1206 2 5157 c 8 A S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0 94-R3D1-1207 3 5157c 8 B S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0 94-R3D1-1208 4 5171 c 8 C S AW set aside. X $0 $0 $0 Sub-Total $0 $0 $p Total Amount Due- $0 NOTE: Payment of final penalty amount should be (INCLUDES APPEALED CITATIONS ONLY( made to: Accountfng Office (OSH) 'You will owe more than this amount if you did not appeal one or more citations or Department of Industrial Relations items containing penalties. Please call (415) 972-8700 if you have any questions. P.O. Box 420603 San Francisco, CA 94142 POS: 02/04/1999 DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL I, the undersigned, declare as follows: I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my place of employment and business address is Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, 100 North Barranca Street, Suite 410, West Covina, California, 91791. On February 4, 1999, I served the attached DECISION by placing a true copy thereof in an envelope addressed to the persons named below at the address set out immediately below each respective name, and by sealing and depositing said envelope in the United States Mail at West Covina, California, with first-class postage thereon fully prepaid. There is delivery service by United States Mail at each of the places so addressed, or there is regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and each of the places so addressed: Craig G. Farrington WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART 701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000 Orange, CA 92868-4720 District Manager DOSH - Anaheim 2100 E. Katella Avenue, Room 140 Anaheim, CA 92806 Mike Mason Chief Counsel DOSH - Legal Unit P. 0. Box 420603 San Francisco, CA 94142 Leonard Strom Staff Counsel DOSH - Legal Unit 3550 West Sixth Street Room 421 Los Angeles, CA 90020 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 4, 1999, at West Covina, California. i L tz L eclara STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on 19E was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on , 19fz IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 0I day of 19±.1 Penny M. KyI6, Secre Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HAW P.DTA\ADMIMBS\FOFMS\F27A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT February 17, 1999 phone: (7141 96 2-2 41 1 To the Chair and Members "'aging add^se" of the Board of Directors P0. Dr.8127 Fountain Vall,C 92726-6127 Subject: Board Lefter street addrea.: 10344 Ellis Avenue Fountain Vanay.cA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 927❑D7019 information on any of the items, please call me. 1998 Yearend Report of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (SARWG) Ace.atr I have attached the SARWG 1998 Year-end Report dated December 31, 1998 from e Lindell Marsh which describes the efforts and accomplishments to date, and outlines cltlas plans for 1999-2000. Also attached is a January 27, 1999 letter to Blake Anderson from Paul Sabatier. a professor at LC Davis, expressing an interest in the SARWG Anaheim partnership. Blake will be interviewed to provide history of the partnership. It's Brea interestingto note that this group has been recognized as a viable emit in such a eaera Park 9 P 9 Y cyareaa short time. Fountain Valley Fullerton Gordon Brace Huntington Beach Orange County Bankruptcy Update Irvine to Habra Attached is a February 4, 1999 letter from the OCIP attorney updating the Pool palm. Alama pending le members on the status of endin islation. Los 9 Newport 9each Orange Placertia Meeting Start Time Change for FAHR Committee Sarta Are seal Beach Stanton The start time for the FAHR Committee has been changed to 5 p.m. At their next Tustin Ville Perk meetings, the OMTS and PDC Committees will also consider earlier start times. Yorta Lints County or grange Report from CASA Sanitary, Districts Mike Dillon, Executive Director of CASA, provided a report the political landscape for rascal Mae. 1999-2000 in Sacramento. A summary follows, and a copy of Mike's report is Midway cuy attached. Witter gletrltte Overview Irvine Rench The 1999-2000 California legislature session will be drastically different from the previous session. There is now a democratic Governor and a majority of democrats in both houses. The Senate is comprised of 25 Democrats and 15 Republicans, and the Assembly is comprised of 48 Democrats and 32 Republicans. The Assembly is 'ID Protect We Puhhc Health erd the Environment through Excellence In waatawater Syatarrs- Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 February 17, 1999 the most altered of the two houses, with sweeping gains by the Democrats and drastic revamping of committee assignments. Governor Davis campaigned on the platform of educational reform, gun control, and protecting the environment, among other issues. His top priority is educational reforms. Environmentalists Hopeful The legislature is expected to be more "environmentally friendly." Environmentalists hope to strengthen environmental laws now that a democratic majority exists in both houses. Legislation that didn't pass under the Wilson administration, such as AB 278 (The Environmental Protection Act: Health Effects), has a good chance of passing in the upcoming session. In fact, a new version of AS 278 that deals with health effects of pollution on children has already been re-introduced as SIB 25, and a bill relating to this same issue was recently introduced at the federal level. Environmental Justice will remain a hot topic in environmental legislation. Mary Nichols, the new Secretary of the State Resources Agency and a veteran environmental advocate in the administrations of former Governor Jerry Brown and President Clinton, stated her top priority is to use the current environmental laws to strengthen environmental protection. Governor's Plans for 1999-2000 Session The Davis administration is still hammering out plans and policies for the 1999-2000 session. Beyond legislation, Governor Davis will have an opportunity to appoint new members to dozens of boards and commissions, including the Air Resources Board, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and the State Water Resources Control Board. Update on Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee Activities On January 29, 1999, proposals were due from cities for the District's Cooperative Projects Program. Twenty-one proposals were received from nine cities and special districts, requesting a total of$5.4 million in funding. Since one of these requests is for a five-year period, the total net request for funding for the next fiscal year is actually$3.2 million. The District's Strategic Plan indicates that inflow and infiltration into our wastewater collection system can be reduced by a rate of up to 40 million gallons per day by the year 2020. The Cooperative Projects Program is designed to help fund projects that will reduce this inflow and infiltration, identify and eliminate illegal connections to the sewer It. * Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 February 17, 1999 and to repair or replace aging infrastructure. The Guidance Review Committee is reviewing these proposals and will make recommendations to the OMTS Committee at its March 3 meeting. The OMTS Committee will review the Guidance Review Committee's recommendations and may make further recommendations before forwarding to the Board for final approval of the selected projects. Attached is a copy of a report that was presented at the February AMSA conference in Phoenix. It is entitled, "The Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey'. This is an interesting document as it points out the perception of the American people on aging infrastructure. The repair or replacement of aging infrastructure is one of the areas that our Cooperative Projects Program is targeting. New Technical Assistance Center Brochure Water-based Cleaners Brochure, Switching to Water-based Cleaners for Repair and Maintenance Parts Cleaning(copy attached) In September 1996, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) passed an amendment to its Rule 1171 with the purpose to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from solvents used by auto repair and maintenance shops to clean parts. Although the rule does not prohibit the use of solvents, to meet the limits set by the ruling, facilities that use solvents to clean parts for automobiles have to switch to water-based cleaners. The compliance deadline was January 1999. The implementation of the rule will dramatically increase the use of water-based cleaners in the South Coast basin. Because the new cleaning solutions, as the name implies, have water as the basis for the formulation, it is expected that most of the users will consider discharging the used, or spent, cleaners to the sewer. There are about 2,300 facilities in the District's jurisdiction, and 40,000 in the South Coast area (based on SCAQMD assessment). Although the number of dischargers is large, the overall discharge volume and impact on the District is expected to be insignificant. However, the cumulative effect of the pollutants in the discharges may be of concern. While the cleaning solutions themselves may not have any pollutants of concern, tests conducted by sanitation agencies have demonstrated that the spent cleaning solutions contain high levels of toxic organics, heavy metals, and oil and grease, and would not meet the District's wastewater discharge limits. With the rule now in effect, and most auto shops either already converted or converting to water-based cleaners, the District's Technical Assistance Center has developed a brochure that summarizes all the information regarding the switch to water-based cleaners and provides details about equipment and water-based cleaners. The brochure is titled Switching to Water-based Cleaners for Repair and Maintenance Parts Cleaning. This brochure comes at the end of a two-year outreach program of workshops conducted in partnership with other sanitation agencies in the Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 February 17, 1999 region, SCAQMD, suppliers and industry. The core of the fold-out brochure consists of details of equipment and their usage, basis for system selection, and the do's and don'ts of water-based cleaners. The message of the brochure is environmentally safe and practical disposal of the spent water-based cleaners. The brochure warns that the spent solution should never be discharged to the sewer without treatment, and recommends that the facility considers a more practical alternative such as hauling by licensed wastehaulers. The brochure will be distributed to the auto repair shops in the District's jurisdiction by mailings and by Source Control staff as part of its routine fieldwork. Groundwater Replenishment System Update The environment work for the Groundwater Replenishment System project, which was started in December 1997, is nearly complete. Next month at our regular March 24 Board meeting, we will be joined by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District, and both Boards will consider certification of the Final EIR for the project. The EIR has proceeded through a very public input procedure beginning with two scoping sessions for the public and separate scoping sessions for staff of your cities and government regulators, followed by the preparation of the Draft Program EIR last November. The Joint Coordinating Committee, which is comprised of Directors of both agencies, held a public workshop and a public hearing in December. Eleven people submitted oral comments at the public hearing, and twenty-two written comments were received by January 6, 1999. the end of the sixty- two-day comment period. You will soon receive copies of both the Draft and Final Program EIR in a separate mailing. The Final EIR addresses all of the oral and written comments received. You will receive resolutions providing for the certification of the EIR as part of your regular March Board Meeting agenda package. The Joint Coordinating Committee, which includes Directors Collins, Swan and Eckenrode and three Water District Directors, Anthony, Kraemer and the committee chairman, Director Pickier, is now working on a new public information campaign, a required new health department report, and a consulting services contract for the next phase of work, Project Development. The Committee is also overseeing grant activities and developing strategies to implement the project. The Joint Coordinating Committee meets on the second and/or fourth Tuesday (usually the fourth Tuesday) at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District. You are encouraged to attend. If you want specific information, please call Tom Dawes at 714 378-3205. Members of the Board of Directors Page 5 February 17, 1999 Complaints from Neighbors We continue to receive a few odor complaints from our neighbors at Plant 2. Most of these are not plant related, but rather identified as coming from other sources, usually local storm drains in the area. One noise complaint was received at Plant 1, and the source was identified by the resident as coming from exhaust fans in the final clarifier complex. Construction management staff is following up in an effort to correct this problem. New Wastewater Management Brochure Attached is our new general-information Wastewater Management brochure, which was produced by the Communications Department. The brochure was designed as a "stand alone" piece, suitable for mailing to various external audiences who have called requesting information about our operations. The brochure will also be included in our general-information packets, which are distributed to plant visitors and by special request to other audiences. This new brochure explains what we do in simple, non-technical terms and replaces an existing pamphlet that was produced in 1993. If you would like copies of the new Wastewater Management brochure, contact Michelle Tuchman, 593-7120. April 10 Board Workshop on Connection Fees The Finance, Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee will hold a special workshop on connection fees from 9 a.m. - 12 noon on Saturday, April 10, in the Board Room. All Board members are invited to attend. The workshop was requested by the FAHR Committee following a lengthy discussion of connection fees at their February meeting. The purpose is to provide background information and review alternatives prior to considering the proposed changes at the May Board meeting. T+ Members of the Board of Directors Page 6 February 17, 1999 Published Articles of Interest I have attached articles on issues of importance to the District that have appeared in various publications that may interest you. If you v ould like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald . McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt H%WP Dr.v,DumeoumrrenE RS tO. Eeo.nmm 22�ox Attachments FY r SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED GROUP --a collaborative planning dialogue facilitated by the Growth Management Institute focused on concems,issues and opportunities regarding the Santa Ana Watershed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT- Lmea L.Marsh.S.m .Larsen a Mari.19500 MarAMur.Sum 720. Irma,CA 92512 Td:949.752-15M Fw:949-152E804 EUAal. rmnh@.Mmtaarol 1998 YEAR-END REPORT December 31, 1998 by Lindell L. Marsh, Siemon, Larsen & Marsh, for the Growth Management Institute, as staff to the Santa Ana River Watershed Group The following is a report of the efforts and accomplishments of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (the 'SARWG") during the fourth quarter of 1998 and for the year, with a view to 1999. BACKGROUND The focus of the group has been to address the problems related to the 50 square mile Chino Basin dairy area and its unsewered population of 350,000 dairy cows and calves) (the largest concentration in the world; with annual milk production of S I billion) located at the heart of the Los Angeles/Riverside/San Bemardino/Orange County Metropolitan region. The Santa Ana River Watershed ("SARW") which strikes through this metropolitan region, has a population of 4.3 million people,expected to increase to 6.8 million within the next 20 years (currently one-eighth of California's population). A major problem within the watershed is salt. Downstream of the dairies is a population of 2.4 million people. Approximately 722,000 dry tons of manure are produced This is the equivalent of an unsewered city of2.5 million people. t The Chino Basin dairy production is more than one-quarter of the California production,which is the largest in the nation I 1997 production. C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Reportdoc I v annually within the area.' The Regional Water Board staff has estimated that a ..significant portion"of 13% of the total that was unaccounted for has been discharged to the River and 54 % per cent retained in the Basin, resulting in about 33,442 tons of salt reaching the �roundwater.s The groundwater basins provide major conjunctive use opportunities that could address concerns regarding the state and inter-state water shortfalls of available water from the Colorado River and the Bay-Delta. In turn, increased salts in downstream water have significant health and cost impacts and sullies efforts underway to reclaim urban waste water.' Ancillary to the dairy-related concerns are concerns and opportunities with respect to wildlife and the sustainability and economic competitiveness of the inland region. Prado Basin and the adjacent dairy area are at the apex of a major regional open space system running south (the Santa Ana Mountains) and west (Chino, Puente and Whittier Hills). On the economic side, the dairy area is bound on four sides by major transportation arteries (rail and highways)through the metropolitan region! Accordingly, it is a significant area both from the perspective of natural environment and economic competitiveness of the inland region. While its future is uncertain, it is clear that there is a very brief window of opportunity within which to take advantage of the significant opportunities presented — both economic and environmental. ACCOMPLISHMENTS The efforts of the SARWG over the past year have focused on this window and have been extremely successful. Since the first tour and meeting of the Group on February 9 of this year,"SARWG has: ' It is estimated that there is currently more than 1.5 million tons of manure on the ground-in corrals, composting facilities,etc. ' Dairy Update Report,California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region, November 20. 1998. ° Some have suggested that the storage capacity of these basins could be one to three million acre feet. ' For example,the Orange County Water and Sanitation Districts are currently developing a"groundwater replenishment system"that will reclaim through state-of-the-art micro-Filtration and reverse osmosis 100.000 acre/feet per year,one-sixth of County water consumption,. s On the east is the 1-15 corridor(a future high speed rail line)which connects-through this area- northern Mexico and San Diego with Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. On the north is the 1-10 and the 60 freeways and the major east/west rail line connecting-through this area--Los Angeles with points east. On the south is the 90 freeway connecting San Bernardino and Riverside to Orange County and the coast The rectangle thus bounded could be a major economic center for the Inland Empire. ' In mid-1997. funded by the Orange County Sanitation District and others, the Growth Management Institute("GMI")began to scope a watershed approach, with interviews and early meetings on some wildlife issues. In January 1997. a task group of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences toured the watershed under the leadership of Blake Anderson.a member of the group. 1 acted as moderator for a discussion session of the group,which included Bob Feenstra of the Milk Producers Council. From the resulting dialogue, both at the meeting and over the next month, the focus turned to the C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 2 U • Obtained funding and firm commitments of over$13.1 mi 11 ion... and informal commitments of more than$15 million" for dairy drainage and run-off controls— drainage basins, dikes, berms and a pilot dairy washwater sewering project. With there funds and overtime efforts, the Count,of San Bernardino began digging the first drainage basin two weeks ago!! At the request of the Group, Congress provided$100,000 to the Corps for the Reconnaissance Study described below. In addition, EPA has provided $22,000 to the Group for the process and has committed $100,000 for the preparation of the Manure Management Strategy described below.12 • More important, SARWG is an effective broad scale collaboration. It enjoys the participation(directly and indirectly) by those representing virtually the entire constituency of agencies and interests: dairies, conservation organizations, water agencies (ground water, water supply dischargers, etc.), local agencies (counties, cities), and state(Water Board, Resources, Fish and Game)and federal agencies (EPA, USDA, Corps of Engineers and Department of Interior). This participation has extended to the regional, state and Washington, D.C. offices of the agencies. A key has been the increased capacity to communicate through e-mail and fazes, with many participating only through e-mail(jar example, this report will be fazed or¢- mailed to approximately 100 people). In addition, SARWG representatives have met extensively with the various state and federal agencies (in California and Washington, D.C.)and have coordinated with and provided information in support of lobbyists with the various participants. • SARWG is not a formal organization. It works through collaboration (promoted by the Group), based upon broad vision and surgical initiatives" that are undertaken Chino Basin dairy area and the SARWG quickened about that focus,with Anderson taking the chair of the effort 10 For agricultural drainage and dairy washwater sewering:S5.5 million(USDA);S4.5 million(San Bernardino County);and,S3.1 million in loan funds(State Water Board). 11 $10 million(State Water Board staff is informally prepared to recommend for further Flood control) and,perhaps,S5 million more or less(USDA)for dairy and watershed efforts(based on language in the FYt1999 budget directing USDA to continue working on the dairy effort). "During 1998,SARWG received funding for the process from the following agencies: County of Orange, Orange County Sanitation and Water Districts,Chino Basin Water Master,Chino Basin Water Conservation District,and EPA(Region IX).with formal and informal commitments of additional funding from the County of San Bernardino.the Milk Producers Council and the Municipal Water District of Orange County. " The word"surgical"was suggested by Blake Anderson during a discussion regarding the need for the group to do more than talk and produce reports and plans. It was agreed that while we needed to evolve a broadly shared"vision,"we also needed to develop and implement surgically focused initiatives. This is a key to effective collaboration. C:\Files\SARW DOCS\199S Year-end Report.doc 3 a by individual participants and supported by the Group. Initiatives have included: dairy drainage; manure and waste management: wildlife planning; and funding. Specific efforts that have been undertaken pursuant to these initiatives include the following: 1. USDA and Locally Funded Dairy Drainage Strategy. The $35 million San Bernardino County flood control program, in part described above, to address dairy drainage. 2. EPA Funded Manure Management Study. Initiation of the development of a Manure Management Strategy, in part to be funded by EPA ($100,000). This includes exploring the construction of a bio-digester(producing electricity) and the establishment of a major co-composting site in the San Joaquin Valley that can accept manure and biosolids from the watershed. 3. Corps Reconnaissance Study. Congressional authorization and appropriation for a Corps of Engineers Reconnaissance Study focused on drainage,wildlife habitat and recreation opportunities in the lower dairy area and watershed-wide. 4. USDA Watershed Planning and Efforts. Congressional direction has provided that USDA will continue its program focused on the dairy area problems. This coincides with and supports the EPAIUSDA National Comprehensive Animal Feeding Operations effort ("EPAIUSDA APO Strategy"), as part of the National Clean Water Action Plan to address non-point source pollution. 5. DO[ and Local Agency Funded Wildlife Habitat Plan Scooing. We have been working with San Bernardino County, the several affected cities, and SAWPA to explore an effort to scope a wildlife planning effort that would focus on the dairy area and high profile species such as the Santa Ana Sucker (anticipated to be proposed for listing as a federally protected endangered species) and the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (a federally listed endangered species). 6. On-site Dairy Waste Management Program. Development of an on-site waste management program, coordinated with the dairies, Regional Water Quality Board and EPA. This would coincide with the renewal of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit for the dairy area and would implement the EPA/USDA AFO Strategy and the Clean Water Action Plan. The objective, and beauty, of these various scoping and study efforts will be the production by May, 1999 of a more detailed strategic vision for the dairy area that is shared by the entire SARWG, including those developing policy within the various local, state and federal agencies and within the State legislature and Congress. C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Repurt.duc 4 a Finally, I believe that one of the most important achievements of SARWG is to • provide a local, state and national model of a way to address various common concerns and opportunities through collaboration that is both respectful of the individuality (and sovereignty) of the interests and agencies involved and at the same time effective. There is no regional agency (i.e., top down)control. The administration of the effort is minimal and lithe. It works through informed, strategic facilitation and individual action. The model is the American art of quilt-making, respectfully and collaboratively stitching together the patches, in a manner that is transparent, open, inclusive, principled and ethical -- based upon a broadly-held vision and surgically focused initiatives. LOOKING AHEAD TO 1999-2000 Concurrently, we are developing a 1999-2000 Strategic Action Plan. It will build on the successes of 1998, continuing to focus and complete the dairy area programs and expanding to support wildlife habitat concerns more broadly, as well as other water- related concerns and opportunities. Highlights include the following: • LeadershinofSARWG The 1999-2000 program focus is the Chino Basin dairy area, but expanding to address wildlife and other concerns on a more watershed-wide basis. Increasingly, it is hoped and intended that the three counties (San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange) and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("SAWPA'), a joint powers agency of the five water supply districts will provide greater leadership within the Group. To this end, it is anticipated that a co-chair will be added from the upper-watershed.14 • Program and Funding in General With this in mind, the scoping studies,described above, being conducted in early 1999 (see discussion below) will provide the basis for both further project specific funding in FY/1999 and FY/2000, as well as a general authorization at the state and federal levels for the watershed as an urbanizing watershed of national significance. We then anticipate major coordinated private sector, local, state and federal funding for FY/2001. This is intended to dovetail with and support state and national programs, including, for example, the Clean Water Action Plan; the EPA/USDA AFO Strategy; wildlife conservation planning efforts and initiatives (including, endangered species); regional, State and federal water quality and supply efforts (State Water " It has been broadly observed that: leadership within the watershed must emanate from the upper watershed for a variety ofreasons:and.such leadership will be welcomed by the lower watershed. Further, while SAR WG is focused on watershed-related concerns and opportunities, the watershed may be a very powerful geographic basis around which others may organize for a variety of regional,state and national- level concerns. In this regard,some have observed the national leadership within the watershed provided by. for example.Congresspersons Lewis.Calvert.Miller.Sanchez.Cos and Packard. In addition.Senator Boxer has been particularly supportive of the Group's efforts. C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 5 a Planning); sustainable ecosystems and communities; metropolitan initiatives (EPA); and, watershed and river efforts (EPA, DOI, Corps, USDA, CEQ, BOR). While it is acknowledged that areas such as the Everglades. Chesapeake Bay, and the Columbia River Basin are ofgreater national priority, the SARW is a priority watershed within a second tier(probably 50) ofsigniificant national watersheds. It can provide a model for how this nation can address such watersheds. In keeping with our view of the national significance of this watershed and the SARWG approach as a model, we intend to expand our collaboration to work with other interests and organizations. SARWG has the opportunity ofproviding leadership in developing national policy on topics such as: collaborative approaches; watersheds; water; wildlife and funding. Other associations and organizations that SARWG could collaborate with include, for example: the Association of Municipal Sewer Agencies, the California Association of Water Agencies, the National Association of Regional Councils, the National Dairy Association, the National Farm Bureau, the National Association of Counties, the National League of Cities,national environmental organizations (e.g.,National Audubon Society, Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy, Defenders of Wildlife, the Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council), the National Association of Home Builders, and the Texas Institute of Applied Environmental Research. • Early 1999 Scooina Efforts As briefly mentioned above, we anticipate that several scoping efforts focused on the dairy area will occur during the first half of 1999, including: (1)the Corps Reconnaissance Study of the lower dairy area; (2) the Manure Manage Strategy including the scoping on an area-wide onsite waste management program; and (3) the Scoping for a Wildlife Habitat Plan for the dairy area. These will be knit together to provide a strategy for the dairy area as a whole. -- Coordination of Scoping Efforts. Key will be our ability to coordinate these scoping studies internally and at the local, regional, state and national levels. To this end, we intend, for example, to establish a small coordinating group and to utilize focused workshops in the Chino Basin area with the SARWG and others(we hope to convene a two day retreat in early March), as well as workshops in the San Joaquin Valley (related to manure management) in that this is the proposed further use area for the manure--with the attendant salts issue--Sacramento with state agencies and regional offices of federal agencies in Washington, D.C. (hopefully hosted by the President's Council on Environmental Quality and GMI). -- Systemic Approach. In addition, we hope that we can bring to bear national experts(on, for example, manure management) as well as systemic thinking (we have been discussing the possibility of collaborating with the Rocky Mountain Institute, with its focus on systemic analysis). C:\Files\SARW DOGS\1998 Year-end Report.doc 6 i -- Basic Assumptions. It will be important to address the fundamental questions regarding the future use of the dairy area and the timing of such uses. In this regard, for example, the dairies may choose to remain in the area provided that adequate support systems are in place: relocate totally; or, relocate in part. Developing early and appropriate assumptions in this regard will result in significant economic benefits and savings to the dairies, as well as others involved in providing infrastructure and other services in this area. The scoping studies will provide the basis for further funding during Fys 1999.2000, as well as FY 2001.i5 These studies are as follows: 1. Drainage Control Strategy. Our objective is to complete the $35 million dairy drainage control program outlined by San Bernardino County. Assuming that existing formal and informal funding commitments are reasonably realized, we will need to identify approximately S7 million of additional grant funding to complete the program. The completion of this program will be a major achievement. 2. Manure Management Strategy("MMS"). Removing the more than 1.5 million tons of manure currently on the ground and developing a sustainable system of handling future manure production(including urine) is critical. It affects the quality of life of the dairy families,as well as the water quality within the groundwater basins and the river—and in turn the effectiveness of our water supply efforts downstream, statewide and inter-state. This is of the highest priority. EPA funding will allow us to prepare a second iteration of the MMS by May 1, 1999, with workshops in the Basin as well as in the San Joaquin Valley and Washington, D.C." The MMS currently includes the following elements: a. On-site manure management: Development of an effective program to provide 25 year storm protection for retention of wastes and the removal of u Tentatively,we have discussed further FY 1999 funding of SS million from USDA and$10 million (loans) from the State Water Board for dairy drainage improvements and for FY 2000,S 10 million from federal sources and S5 million from state sources for drainage and manure management purposes. These amounts will be revised as the studies are completed. 16 The involvement of San Joaquin Valley interests and agencies,as well as experts nation-wide,will be important in that it is proposed that the Valley will be the primary destination for manure production(as a soils amendment). Accordingly, in keeping with the principled approach of the SAR WG,they need to be involved in questions of the quality of the materials and the impacts of the materials on the Valley. While the materials an very valuable as a soils amendment,there are questions regarding salts and other ' concerns. The Valley currently has no drain;the San Luis Drain,proposed as pan of the State Water Plan was never built,and may never be built because of concerns regarding the Son Francisco Bay and Delta, the proposed discharge location of the Drain. These concerns must be addressed. C:\Files\SARW DOCS\1998 Year-end Report.doe 7 r manure from dairies." This is required by current regulations and will be accomplished through cooperation between the dairies, the Regional Water Board and EPA. It also will be a topic of the extension of the existing general IJPDES permit for the area. b. Biodieester: Explores the possibility of the construction of a biodigester that will produce electricity and reduce the bulk of the manure that must be transported out of the basin. Discussions are currently underway with prospective developers and operators. c. Maximization of Comoosters within the Basin: Focuses on maximizing the throughput of the composters within the Basin(approximately 300,000 tons, of a total of more than 700,000 tons produced). See footnote 17 above, for the Orange County Water District's effort to encourage the maximization of the throughput. There is currently a sense that the permitting of additional composting facilities within the Basin would be a difficult undertaking. This assumption will be further explored. d. San Joaquin Valley Co-composter: Focuses on the development of a large- scale, state-of-the-art composting facility in the San Joaquin Valley that would accommodate manure, biosolids, and green and food wastes. The idea is that the quality of the product could be significantly improved and controlled and, thereby, would command a high price. e. Transportation and Marketine of Materials: A factor underlying the Chino Basin manure problem has been the loss of agricultural lands within the immediate vicinity available for the spreading of manure(and for the production of animal foodstock as well). In turn, the coordination of markets in distant locations such as the San Joaquin Valley (and the seasonal needs of many farmers in that area) and the necessary transportation (coordination of up and back trips) with the seasonal (i.e., rain-related) needs of the almost 300 dairy owners in the Basin has been very difficult to accomplish. As discussed above,with the EPA funding, we intend to scope these elements, utilizing workshops of experts as well as those agencies and interests involved both within the Chino Basin and the San Joaquin Valley. 3. Wildlife Conservation Planning Strategy. Portions of the Chino Basin (including the Prado Dam storage area)are important for wildlife and open space purposes and there is the opportunity for expanding wildlife habitat from the In 1998,the Orange County Water District paid down the S2.65 per ton tipping fee by SI.65 to encourage the dairies to move their manure to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's composter,to the extent of S 150.000. This was a good faith expression by the downstream water supplier of its willingness to encourage the removal of manure before it reaches the groundwater and river(and in turn reducing the salt content in these waters). C:\FilesISARW DOCSX1998 Year-end Report.doc 8 s lower portion of the area upward upward. The intent is for SARWG to work under the lead of the County of San Bernardino's multiple species habitat conservation planning program, and in coordination with SAWPA, the affected cities and the various interests, to scope a wildlife habitat plan for portions of the dairy area, as well as to address several high profile species, including the Santa Ana Sucker and the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. This scoping would be completed by May 1, 1999. 4. Watershed Improvements and Funding. It is clear that the water-related systems within the watershed must be developed, managed and funded in a collaborative and coordinated manner. These include storage,conjunctive use, water supply, reclamation and conservation. They also include, as shared with others, wildlife, flood control,dairy operations, etc. It has been suggested that SAWPA take the lead with the Group for the development of a proposal for water bond funding ($350,000,000) for the watershed with a Congressional match. By May, 1999,with the several scoping efforts completed in consultation with the affected constituency of interests and agencies, we should have a strong sense of an appropriate vision or visions for the area, together with immediate next steps and needs.18 IN CONCLUSION, I am very proud of and pleased with the SARWG effort to date. We have made significant progress and have every reason to believe that we have laid the foundation for even greater progress in 1999/2000. From a personal standpoint, it has been very rewarding. This effort is on the cutting edge of the evolving forms of governance. It speaks to both the need to respect the individual and to provide for collaboration. We are developing a model that will, I strongly believe,have national application. Our success is the result of collaboration. In particular, I would like to especially thank Blake Anderson for his vision, leadership and steadfast support; SAWPA for providing a space to meet; Bob Feenstra for his expertise, savvy, good heart and willingness to apply it all; Geoff Vanden Heuvel for his practical wisdom,principles and leadership; Ken Miller for his efforts (overtime) and good nature; Felicia Marcos, Alexis Strauss, Clarice Gaylord and Jim Earsom and the USDA folks for their support; Traci Stewart and Barry Kehl for their support;Jerry King and Mary Jane Forster for their guidance and caring; Senator Boxer; Congresspersons Lewis, Kim and Sanchez; Assemblymen Fred Aguiar (now Supervisor) and Joe Baca(now State Senator);and Walt Petit and Bill Campbell, and all of their staffs, for supporting our funding initiatives; Eric Sapirstein and John Fisher for lobbying them for the Group; Jerry Thibeault for enduring and supporting; Jim Ragsdale; Larry Walker for his clarity and leadership; Mike Cook and David Cottingham for both staying over to tour the area. And the Group. In addition,hopefully,we will be able to accomplish a number of helpful tasks.such as the preparation of shared GIs data bases that will be available for all of these efforts. C:\Files\SARW DOCSU998 Year-end Report.doc 9 �}�i'2rS ft ticc� �tEci= UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS aEMME12Y• DA\'IS •IRVIN[• LOSANGEL[5• NVCWIDC•$AN DIaGp SiN Fl4WCISCO � _ � SMTA BAA6MA SA\"I'A CRL"Z DEPART..EW OF IRONMEN SC4 c,, NDMUI ONE S"�S AVENUE DAVIS.CAL MMA 95616-9576 Blake Anderson January 27, 1999 Chief Operating Officer C /�* Sanitation Districts of Orange County ( Toe CtQst\Gsr9tT IOWEllis Ave. { Fountain Valley,CA 92708 LlnAt `{/),y��(I. BO6 [� `ttj9C Slfttdlzr Dear Blake Anderson: Bog CZ0U*T-LI t 'C", Mli-�s 71,11,Tflos�,w�r In recent years,a large number of stakeholder-based watershed negotiation projects have been formed in an effort to reconcile the competing uses affecting our state's streams and rivers.To date, however, no one has a very good understanding of the factors that influence the ability of these stakeholder partnerships to reach agreement on,and to actually implement,concrete management measures. We have recently received grants from the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to study these questions in as objective a manner as possible. One hundred watershed partnerships in the states of California and Washington have been randomly selected for detailed examination. The Santa Ana River Watershed Group is among the 100 partnerships selected. In each partnership,we anticipate gathering data concemtng a story of the partnership and the reasons affecting its ability to agree on, and implement,management plans. This will involve interviews with 4-6 of the most important participants,gathering relevant documents, and sending a mail survey to 20-30 people knowledgeable about the partnership. Our contacts in UC Extension, the California Department of Forestry,the Natural Resources Conservation Service,and other organisations have suggested you as one of the most informed people regarding the history of this partnership. One of our colleagues will be contacting you shortly to arrange an interview at your convenience. The interview, which should last about an hour,will address the history of the partnership,your perceptions of the factors affecting its ability to reach and implement agreements,and your suggestions of knowledgeable people to survey. The information provided will be completely confidential. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 530-752-3074(Sabatier)or 530-752-8027(Quinn). You may also wish to consult members of the project's advisory committee: Mike Chapel(US Forest Service),Diane Holcomb(Natural Resources Conservation Service),Scott Stone(Polo Land&Cattle Co.),Marc Hoshovsky(Cal.Fish&Game),Stefan Lorensato(State Water Resources Control Board),or Carl Rountree(BLM). Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide. Re zc / / /�• n •W James Quinn, Professor Professor CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES Report of the Executive Director, Mike Dilloo January 21, 1999 I. NEW SESSION OFF AND RUNNING On December 7, 1998, members of the legislature were swom in to begin the 1999-2000 Legislative Session. Both houses, containing Democratic majorities, will maintain the same leaders as last session of Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa in the Assembly and Senate President pro Tem John Burton in the Senate. Both houses then adjourned to return for the start of business the first week of January. The 1999-2000 session got off to a controversial start on Monday,January 4, with the Assembly Republican's objection to the new House Rules, proposed by the Democratic majority. Specifically, Republicans tried to block a provision that will prevent individual legislators from offering motions to withdraw bills from committee, to send them directly to the Floor. The practical consequences of this rule will be to force the minority party to debate controversial issues only in policy committee,rather than on the Floor, which has been a tool used by both parties in the past to elevate issues that had been stalled or defeated in committee. The Rules ended up passing on a party-line vote on Monday. U. NEW COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS The Assembly and Senate have released their respective lists of membership on the standing committees for the nerd session. With the impact of term limits being felt, and the addition of more than 30 new faces this year in both houses,the changes in committee compositions from just two years ago are dramatic. Some committees of interest to CASA members are: Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials: Hannah-Beth Jackson (Chair), Mike Briggs (Vice Chair), Jim Cunneen, Ted Lempert, Alan Lowenthal, Ken Maddox, Carl Washington, Patricia Wiggins. Assembly Local Govemmen : John Longville (Chair),Ken Maddox (Vice Chair), Ellen Corbett, Howard Kaloogian, Nell Soto, Bruce Thompson, Helen Thomson,and Tom Torlakson. Assembly Natural Resources: Howard Wayne(Chair), Sam Aanestad(Vice Chair), Elaine Alquist, Richard Dickerson, Hannah-Beth Jackson,Fred Keeley, Alan Lowenthal, Mike Machado, Carole Migden, Rico 011er,and Robert Pacheco. Assembly Water. Parks. and Wildlife: Mike Machado (Chair), Richard Dickerson (Vice Chair), Sam Aanestad, Roy Ashburn, Thomas Calderon, Dennis Cardoza,Dean Florez,Dick Floyd, Peter Frusetta, Sheila James Kuehl, Bob Margett, Virginia Strom-Martin,and Howard Wayne. In the Senate... Senate Agriculture and Water Resources: Jim Costa(Chair), Debra Bowen, Maurice Johannessen, Dave Kelley,Dick Monteith,Deborah Ortiz, Steve Peace,Don Perata, Charles Poochigian,Jackie Speier, and Cathie Wright. I Senate Environmental Oualitv: Byron Sher(Chair),Dede Alpert, Richard Alarcon, Wes Chesbro, Tom Hayden, Bruce McPherson,Jack O'Connell,Richard Rainey, Hilda Solis, and Cathie Wright. Senate Local Government: Richard Rainey(Chair), Joe Baca, Maurice Johannessen, Dick Monteith, Don Perata, Richard Polanco, and Adam Schiff. Senate Natural Resources and Wildlife: Tom Hayden (Chair), Dede Alpert, Debra Bowen, Maurice Johannessen, Patrick Johnston, Tim Leslie, Dick Monteith, Byron Sher, and Hilda Solis. III. GOVERNOR'S BUDGET RELEASED On January 8, 1999, Governor Gray Davis held a press conference to announce the release of his proposed state budget for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. The Budget Highlights document notes that the "U.S. and California economies we expected to slow in 1999 and 2000" due to declines in consumer spending and business investment, the recession in Asia,and a slowing in the state's monthly employment figures. Given these understandings, the Governor has proposed a fiscally modest budget, with heavy emphasis on improving standards and performance in K-12 education. County Governments came out on the short end once again. While the Governor acknowledges that counties are still financially squeezed from the property tax shift several years ago, he nonetheless reduces funding for several county programs by almost$200 million and shifts the money to his own state priorities. Under the State Water Resources Control Board, the Budget Summary indicates that: 1) "In 1999-00, the Board expects to complete 3,110 compliance inspections of permitted facilities, issue or update 938 water quality permits, issue 77 water rights permits, and adopt 6 major water rights orders. 2) "The Budget includes an augmentation of$6 million(Federal Tmst Fund) and 30 positions to address water pollution. Using a watershed approach, staff will work with stakeholders to identify sources of pollutants within priority watersheds and develop limits for the total amount of waste that can be discharged. 3) "The Budget includes an augmentation of$1.5 million (Waste Discharge Permit Fund) and ten positions to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System storm water permits to 115 municipalities and an estimated 5,000 construction sites not currently regulated." IV. BUDGET DOES NOT PROVIDE "FRAY" RELIEF FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Calling the proposal "A New Relationship for a New Century," the Governor has noted that the property tax shift, "concurrent with a growing reluctance of voters to approve increased taxes and compounded by economic difficulties during the 1980's and 1990's, has led to fierce state-local battles over limited financial resources." However, the Budget Finance document hesitates to offer assistance to local governments for ERAF relief in 1999, as the "state budget revenue growth is not as high as hoped." It further adds: 'The Administration intends to establish the principle of sharing the 2 benefits of an improved California economy with local governments. At the same time, it is obvious that state government cannot provide financial relief to local governments in good times and be expected to provide the same level of support during troubled economic times." Consequently, the "Administration will have a reasoned discussion with local elected officials and interested citizens. This Budget offers to start that discussion and the Governor directs his Office of Planning and Research,to make recommendations, within 45 days, on the proper forum and method." The Governor's Director of Finance, Tim Gage,told those present at the Budget press conference that there was a desire to mitigate the impact of the property tax shift, but given the current level of revenues available, didn't anticipate a return of the ERAF revenues in the current year. He nonetheless agreed that discussions needed to get underway to find a permanent solution to local government finance relief. V. GOVERNANCE CONSENSUS PROJECT A group called the California Governance Consensus Project, administered under the auspices of the California Center For Public Dispute Resolution,a joint program of California State University Sacramento,and the McGeorge School of Law,has also been discussing major governance and financing proposals. Under consideration are: 1) Restore accountability and financial stability to local government, and ensure that revenue streams provide incentives for balanced growth, 2) Realign state/county responsibilities to make the state responsible for financing mandated levels of financial aid and health services if it can be done in a manner that is revenue neutral to the state General Fund, 3) Require the state legislature and Governor to adopt a balanced and timely budget, built around a strategic long-term planning process that provides for protection of a budget reserve, makes it more difficult to approve tax loop holes, and ensures fees are applied in an efficient and equitable manner. In addition to local governmentrepresentatives,others involved in the Consensus Project include teacher unions, taxpayer groups, and business interests. What will come out of this group is still uncertain as some of the issues are quite contentious. For example,the Howard Jarvis group is declaring war on such issues as lowering the vote threshold on the use of property tax for local bond proposals. VI. COMMISSION ON LOCAL GOVERNANCE FOR THE 21n CENTURY In 1997, a bill by Assemblyman Hertzberg(AB 1484), created the Commission on Local Governance for the 219 Century. The commission,which will exist until January 1,2000,is comprised of 15 members: 9 appointed by the Governor, and 3 each appointed by the Senate and Assembly Rules Committee respectively. The Commission has been charged with the task of completing a study of "potential revisions to the laws that govem city,county,and special district boundary changes(the 3 local agency formation sections of the Government Code, also known as the Cortese-Knox Act.) The members have also expressed interest in exploring other issues relating to the effectiveness and efficiency of delivery of local government services." The Commission had its first organizational meeting in September, and CASA was present at its October meeting in San Diego where special district governance and organization issues were discussed by representatives from San Diego LAFCO's, ACWA, and individual special districts. At least a dozen other meetings are scheduled in various locations to make it easier for communities throughout California to participate in commission hearings. CASA will be scheduled to speak at a hearing in the Spring, and we will notify our members when the date has been officially set VII. THE "RAINEY WORKING GROUP" AND THE "PEACE HEARINGS" You will recall from our previous report to you in October, that CASA had been invited to participate in a select group of local government lobbyists, whose goal was to discuss possible solutions to the current way in which local government is financed. Senator Richard Rainey's Chief of Staff, Diane Longshore has served as the leader of the group,and is assisted by various members of the Senate and Assembly Local Government Committees. In early discussions,proposals such as a "protection measure" to freeze out the state's ability to take any more ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) money from local governments, or the old "Isenberg Superpot" concept from the Constitution Revision Commission project, were debated. A November meeting found the group discussing issues such as a clearer delineation of who should provide services, and securing a stronger "lock" on the funding sources for those services. Shortly thereafter,CASA was asked to participate in a working group called together by Senator Steve Peace,new Chair of the Senate Budget Committee,to establish an ongoing dialogue on local government finance and to evaluate current stateilocal financial relationships and proposals to reform the system of local government finance. Participants in the initial meeting included lobbyists from the major local government associations and key legislative staff. Senator Peace wishes to have six regional meetings, beginning January 22, and ending February 8' , in Los Angeles, Placerville, Oakland, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Merced. Eighteen local representatives, including six from cities, six from counties, and six from special districts will be invited to participate in the three hour meetings at each location, with Senator Peace chairing the meetings. Each meeting will begin with an "independent reviewer," yet to be selected, who will provide a ten minute overview of the current financing, including what has happened to local governments in the years since Proposition 13 and the property tax shift. Senator Peace, who is well known for his ability to pull disparate groups together on major issues such as electrical deregulation and worker's compensation reform, does not wish to have any prepared presentations, but rather wants to have wide-ranging discussions with each discussion group. ACWA, CSDA, and CASA are jointly submitting the names of the special districts' representatives who will testify to Senator Peace and his staff. 4 VIII. Cal-PIRG SPONSORED WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION RE-INTRODUCED Assemblywoman Carole Migden(D-San Francisco)has again introduced legislation mandating stringent pollution prevention requirements, establishing mandatory penalties for water quality violations,and requiring that discharge permits include effluent limits without regard to reasonable potential analyses. AB 50(Migden)is similar to last year's AB 1862. The bill's provisions include: • Mandatory pollution prevention measures on the part of all permitted discharges, including complex pollution prevention cost analyses that use "full cost accounting standard methods." • Mandatory effluent limits for all pollutants, without regard to whether monitoring information reveals reasonable potential for the discharge to cause or contribute to an exceedance of a water quality objective. • Non-discretionary minimum penalties for violations,which undemtine a reasonable progressive approach to enforcement and intrude upon the enforcement discretion vested in the regional boards. • Legislative findings that are generalized,paint the majority of publicly-owned treatment works as chronic violators,and ignore the fact that the majority of water pollution problems are caused by nonpoint sources. State Legislative Committee members have already begun drafting amendments to AB 50 that would address CASA's concerns. AB 1862 advanced to the Senate last year before stalling in the Judiciary Committee. Governor Wilson was expected to veto AB 1862 had it reached his desk. The fate of AB 50 is far less certain,however,given the new Administration. IX. STATE AGENCY WORK GROUP WOULD ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUES SB 89(Escutia)would require the Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA)to convene an environmental justice working group of representatives from state environmental agencies. The working group's charge would be to identify disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations. The work group would include representatives of each of the boards, offices,departments and commissions under CaVEPA,the Resources Agency and the Department of Health Services. Each agency would be required to hold public meetings and develop model environmental justice projects; develop an agency-wide environmental justice strategy;and provide minority and low income populations with an opportunity to romment on the strategies. 5 X. SAN MARCOS REVISITED In the 1987-88 Legislative Session, CASA and ACWA were extensively involved in legislation relating to capital facilities fees. The Legislation, authored by Assemblyman Dom Cortese, was in response to a 1986 decision of the California Supreme Court in San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School District, in which the court held that the water district lacked the specific statutory authority to impose a "capacity" of"capital facilities' fee to offset the capital costs of providing sewer service to the San Marcos School District. The court decision came m a shock to the cities, counties, and special districts that had been providing utility services to other public agencies for decades and imposing charges for such services. The court suggested that the Legislature could address the problem by.providing specific statutory authority for such charges,and a battle between all segments of education, including the university, and local government ensued. AB 1350-Cortese was ultimately enacted in 1988,after certain compromises had been reached by all parties. Certain school districts and the University of California have taken legal action against several public agencies, seeking a refund of capital facility fees dating back to 1988. This year,ACWA is sponsoring legislation to clarify that water rates can include a component that reflects the cost of operation,maintenance, repair,replacement or rehabilitation of facilities that provide public utility service to schools, rather than only the construction costs of such facilities. CASA has been asked to support ACWA's efforts. XI. ROBERTA LARSON LENDING A HAND CASA's Director of Regulatory Affairs, Melissa Thorme, is on maternity leave for the next few months, after the birth of her second daughter, Anika. Melissa continues to do important work from her home, including the Bio-solids and TMDL lawsuits, as well as many other issues you have read about in her Regulatory Bulletin. CASA's former Director of Regulatory Affairs, Bobbi Larson,with the law firm of DeCuir and Somach, has been retained on a contract basis to supplement CASA staff efforts on legislative and regulatory issues that demand her expertise in Sacramento. Bobbi has also been involved in the above mentioned lawsuits on behalf of some of our individual CASA member agencies. President Jim Bewley recently commented that,"this arrangement enables us to have two individuals with particularly strong expertise in their respective areas." CASA is fortunate to have their assistance. XIL LEGISLATION Attached is a Legislative Summary of bills considered by the Legislative Committee to date. The deadline for final introduction of bills is February 26. If this session is typical of prior sessions, several thousand bills will be introduced in February. 6 FEE) 04 '99 13:27 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 6192361995 TO III r.ne Pillsbury J4 �t>'via-0 tomp' —O AnXXR E sAT"W 301 W=no"DWAY 9=na) sAx pIFLp.(Aldlpvnu 911o1a,9 TnFFAlNIe(61"2 tan FA 019,2161905 IN YWA,.' NalFrvbwsr Madison a Sutro LLP wr:�,win dW e„m r o=.0 (619) 544-3177 shel—pc@piEsburylaw.com February 4, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In Re County of Orange - Stains of Pending Litigation Dear Pool Participants: On Monday, February 1, 1999, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Taylor held hearings on a number of motions regarding the Representative's remaining litigations. In particular, the Court considered McGraw-Hill's motion for partial summary judgment on the contract and professional malpractice claims pending against Standard & Poor's. The Court granted summary judgment to McGraw-Hill and against the Representative on the single theory that the Representative could assert multiple claims for financial advice separate from S & P's bond rating function; however, the Court denied the motion as to all other claims, thereby allowing all of the remaining causes of action to proceed forward to trial. Judge Taylor them considered the two motions for partial summary judgment filed by various broker/dealer defendants. These defendants argued that, based on the Court's Wiling in County of Orange v. FLSecurities, Inc. (as described in my January 7, 1999 correspondence to you), the ultra vires issues raised in the broker/dealer cases should likewise be decided in defendants' favor. Although Judge Taylor issued a tentative order denying these motions, the matters were taken under submission and no final rulings have been issued. The Court also heard argument on the Representative's motions for an order vacating the previous decisions of the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court, which dismissed the Representative's aiding and abetting claims against McGraw-Hill and Fuji Securities. As I reported to you in my earlier correspondence concerning Judge Taylor's prior ruling granting summary judgment to Fuji, the Appellate Court in California issued a ruling in City of Atascadero v. Merrill Lynch, which calls Judge Taylor's earlier Fuji ruling into question and appears to support the Representative's position not just against Fuji, but also against the 3M1 C6.40149 AH(aPFNEW Yo9[OtA c COUMY sACrAI.VMO VLA. (=0 suI Y.WEY WASNIMGlIX1.0.0 RRT0 1129860r. FEB 04 '99 13:27 F P[L SMRY MADISON 6192361995 TO 16 Orange County investment Pool Participants' Distribution List February 4, 1999 Page 2 broker/dealers. Consequently, the Representative also sought to amend the complaint against the broker/dealer defendants to add claims for aiding and abetting and other causes of action based upon the Atascadero case holding. The Court also took these matters under submission and will be the subject of a later written opinion by Judge Taylor. We will continue to advise you of the status of these matters. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions. Very [Wily. yours, Patrick C. Shea cc: Official Investment Pool Participants Committee and Counsel zizseaa. amsa FaxAlert - - January 29, 1999 AMSA Briefs Senate Environment A Public Works Committee Last week, AMSA briefed Senate Environment& Public Works Committee staff on the Association's legislative priorities for the 106i°Congress. While stressing the importance of the Urban Wet Weather Management Act of 1999, nonpoint source pollution control and stepped up federal funding for CSOs, SSOs, stormwater and nonpoint source controls,AMSA also informed Senate staff of the Association's stance on other key issues including TMDLs, Superfund, pretreatment, watershed management, the Municipal Biological Monitoring Act of 1999 and the Arid West Water Quality Act. AMSA explained to Senate staff the problems facing wastewater agencies as a result of EPA's current TMDL program and notified them of the Association's new TMDL guidance encouraging dischargers to intervene in the TMDL process to protect their rights. AMSA suggested to the committee staff that TMDLs,as they are currently applied, might be ripe for legislative action to fix nagging problems such as growth restrictions and the potential exemption of nonpoint sources. AMSA also requested the Senate's help in securing -- $1.775 million to support the National Biosolids Partnership. Currently AMSA is drafting letters to the Chairmen of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees— Sen. Christopher Bond (R-Mo.)and Rep. James Walsh(D-N.Y.)—requesting further federal support for the partnership. Nationwide Survey Shows Strong Support For Wastewater Funding The 1999 Rebuild America InGesWcture Survey— released January 27— shows overwhelming support for federal spending on a wide array,of infrastructure including"transportation, sanitation and water quality." AMSA is a member of the Rebuild America Coalition, an organization of 60 public and private groups that are focusing attention at all levels of government on strengthening the nation's infrastructure. Of those polled,66 percent considered infrastructure spending a`strong investment in America." In fact, 55 percent believes that more federal dollars directed to wastewater agencies would have a"noticeable" effect on wastewater treatment. The survey supports AMSA's position that more federal money is necessary to maintain existing wastewater infrastructure and at the same time address the challenges posed by wet weather in the form of agricultural runoff combined and sanitary sewer overflows(CSOs and SSOs)and stormwater. It also demonstrates that the public understands the clear connection between federal dollars and cleaner water. Interestingly, the survey shows public support for watershed-based clean water regulation. For example, 61 percent favor an approach "that focuses on an overall coordinated plan that takes into account all environmental concerns"rather than one that`focuses on the specific, known sources of pollution." The survey suggests that the public would support more federal money to balance the current ratio of local dollars to federal dollars spent to safeguard water quality. The write survey is available on the web at hrp.-11 w .rebuildamericaorg. > Clarification/AMSA's Peak Performance Awards Program(see Member Update 99-1) Platimurt Awards are presented to member agency facilities who have received Gold Awards for five consecutive years. According to Board of Directors policy,`the award of Platinum Awards is not rolling. Upon receipt of a Platinum Award, a facility must receive Gold Awards for the next five consecutive years to again qualify." We hope this clarifies questions regarding eligibility for Platinum Awards, and we apologize for any confusion caused by the omission of this information from Member Update 99-1. Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 1 of 16 u � Infrastructure Updates & Resources ffr"TIM !„cr y,r � . Public Awareness Toolkit . Infrastructure Resources on the Web . Fact Sheets . Case Studies & Guides � . Press Releases ® Infrastructure News Briefs Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey Prepared by The Luntz Research Companies January 1999 A special thanks to the following organizations for making the poll possible.' Bentley Systems Inc. American Consulting Engineers Council American Concrete Pavement Association American Public Works Association American Road& Transportation Builders Association Associated General Contractors or America Construction Industry Manufacturers Association ancial Guaranty Insurance Company Fin National Association or Counties • verview . And the Walls Come Tumbling Down . Raindrops Keep Falling . The Price is Right . The Little Red Schoolhouse . The Roads They Travel . The Urban-Rural Difference . Party Politics . Conclusion . Appendix: Infrastructure's Lighter Side . Message from Philadelphia Mayor and Rebuild America Chiarman Edward G. Randall OVERVIEW "That mealy-mouthed word, infrastructure. It sticks to the roof of the mouth like peanut butter http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htm] 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 2 of 16 on while bread. But there is no level of human concern in America-race, economic fulfillment of the individual, fairness/equality, social justice, competitiveness, raising the national spirit and standards of living-that is not addressed, attended to, and ameliorated by the contribution that the infrastructure makes to our well-being." Jim Lebentha/ Vice-Chair, Rebuild America Coalition There are five key findings in our study of American attitudes toward the nation's infrastructure. First and foremost, with only a few exceptions, public opinion runs relatively constant across regional lines and in urban, suburban and rural areas. Americans of all stripes regard federal spending for the infrastructure as necessary and important, and they clearly link the quality of the infrastructure with their own quality of life. They are even willing to pay more in taxes if that money goes to improvements in roads, sanitation, water quality, and most infrastructure projects. Overall, the population has mixed perceptions of recent changes in the American infrastructure. In fact, there are more people who perceive that the conditions of the various infrastructure components - roads, bridges, mass transit, airports, school buildings, etc. - have improved over the past few years than think conditions are worsening. Their opinions are not unilateral, however, and also indicate the awareness that much remains to be done. In short, the public outlook toward the infrastructure is typically American: hopeful, but aware of the serious challenges that lie ahead. AND THE WALLS COME TUMBLING DOWN A popular misperception is that the American people need to be convinced that a crisis is just around the corner or that a disaster is about to occur before they are willing to invest to fix or prevent the problem. More accurately, Americans will spend money on improvements or prevention, but only if they can see the difference with their own eyes. As we enter the final months of the 20th Century, the public appears cautiously positive about the various components that make up America's infrastructure. In fact, in every area we tested - airports, mass transit, quality of the drinking water, quality of the rivers and lakes, roads, bridges and http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates- Rebuild America Coalition Page 3 of 16 highways, and public school buildings -a solid majority either believe conditions have remained constant over the past five years or so, or even improved. IS YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE BETTER OFF THAN IT WAS FIVE YEARS AGO? Has this element of gotten stayed or gotten Infrastructure better the same worse The quality of airport 39% 36% 11% service The physical condition of 38°A 28°A 29°� public school buildings Your area's roads, 38°A 31°A 30°A bridges, and highways Water quality of rivers, lakes, and coastal areas 26 A 36 A 30 The quality of mass transit 4°A 6% 18°A Drinking water quality 13°A 1157°A 25% Your community's 24% infrastructure America's infrastructure 35°A 31% 31% When taken as a whole, Americans are evenly divided over the direction of the national infrastructure over the past five years. Just over one-third (35%) believe national conditions have improved, while just under one-third (31%) consider conditions to have deteriorated and 31% believe there has been no change. The numbers are similar when Americans asked about infrastructure conditions within their own community over the past five years: 32% better, 24% worse and 40% about the same. In this case, there are several stunning demographic differences: . "Generation X"Americans are far less likely to perceive a decline in the national infrastructure or the infrastructure in their own community than their parents and grandparents. . College graduates are far more likely than other education subgroups to believe infrastructure conditions nationally are deteriorating. In fact, college grads are more critical of the national infrastructure than any other major demographic subgroup in the survey. They are also more likely than any other http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 4 of 16 , education subgroup to believe their own community infrastructure is worsening, but to a lesser degree. . A large racial gap exists as well. Whites are narrowly more likely to believe conditions nationally are getting worse (32% improving; 35%worsening), while blacks and Hispanics are overwhelmingly positive (40% improving; 15% worsening). . Most significant, there are deep differences by community. By a 38% to 25% margin, urban dwellers believe the national infrastructure has worsened over the past five years. Conversely, 41% of all rural residents believe infrastructure conditions have improved, while only 27% believe it has worsened. By comparison, urban, suburban and rural residents are all more likely to believe infrastructure conditions in their own community have improved in recent years. It is important to note that those who believe America's infrastructure is improving are more likely than virtually anyone else to believe infrastructure spending makes a noticeable impact on the community around them and represents a strong investment in America. They are even willing to pay more in personal taxes if the money goes to specific infrastructure projects. These findings are unprecedented. For the most part, Americans are only willing to accept a tax increase if they believe an issue or problem is worsening. But when that issue is America's infrastructure, those that are most satisfied with the current direction of the country are most willing to spend more. RAINDROPS KEEP FALLING Americans are particularly concerned about water quality. In fact, of all the infrastructure categories we tested, drinking water quality and the water quality of rivers, lakes, and coastal areas are the only two categories where more Americans believe conditions have deteriorated rather than improved over the past five years. There are several interesting demographic and geographic differences here: . Younger women (who are most likely to have young children at home) and those from the Midwest are particularly negative toward the quality of drinking http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 5 of 16 water in their area. . Older men (who make up a large percentage of America's fishermen) are far more likely to complain about the quality of the rivers, lakes and coastal areas in their area than other Americans. While these subgroup differences do exist, a consensus also exists for a combination of"additional federal dollars and private sector involvement"to address the wastewater problem. In fact, a majority (55%) believes such a strategy would have a "noticeable" effect on wastewater treatment. In this cynical age, where most Americans feel that tax dollars disappear down a black hole never to be seen again, this expression of confidence in a government/private sector partnership to produce noticeable results is worth making special note of. It is interesting to note that Americans are evenly split when asked to assign responsibility for the nation's clean water programs. Just under half(48%) want the federal government to assume "more of a primary role,"while 44% would prefer the states and communities continue to bear most of the fiscal responsibility-they currently shoulder 90% of the funding burden. In this case, the opinion split is driven by partisanship: . Republicans prefer local rather than federal fiscal responsibility by a 55% to 39% margin; . Democrats are almost a perfect mirror image - 56% want the federal government to bear more of the financial burden for clean water programs, while just 38%feel the matter should continue to be funded by states and communities. It is worth noting that a majority of 18-29 year olds say that the federal government should play more of a role in the nation's clean water programs rather than turning it over to the states and communities (by a 53%-43% margin). Seniors go the other way, favoring states and communities to the federal government by a slim 46%-43% plurality. How ironic that the generation that came of age under Ronald Reagan is more likely to support larger funding responsibilities for the federal government, whereas the generation that came of age under Franklin Roosevelt favors local, community bearing more of a burden. While Americans may differ in whom they hold accountable http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 6 of 16 for sewage and wastewater, their opinions about the approach to the issue is clear. By a two-to-one ratio (63% to 31%), Americans favor an approach that "focuses on an overall coordinated plan that takes into account all environmental concerns" rather than one that "focuses on the specific, known sources of pollution." The response was truly universal, every single subgroup examined supports the overall coordinated plan concept. THE PRICE IS RIGHT "Now is the time to deal with this issue...There won't be another time...We have to do it now...We're looking at a $1 trillion surplus..." Ed Rendell Mayor of Philadelphia In this age of cynicism toward Washington, America's infrastructure is one of the few areas where the public believes a dollar spent by government is a dollar well invested. Most Americans are unwilling to support tax increases for any reason. There is a universal perception among the public that they are overtaxed, and that they get far too little in return for what they send to Washington. The promise to cut taxes has launched many political careers, while the suggestion of increasing taxes, even for the best of reasons, has stopped others dead In their tracks. Yet fully two-thirds of the population (66%) spread across all regions and areas of the country describe spending on America's infrastructure as a "strong investment in America." By comparison, only 26% of the population believes "infrastructure dollars disappear once they are spent." Few government programs can boast of such a high and consistent level of support across demographic and regional lines. There are two additional findings that deserve mention: . Those whom are better educated are even more likely to have a favorable outlook toward federal spending on the infrastructure. Among college graduates, a sizeable 74% believe infrastructure spending represents an investment in America, compared to 56% among those without any college education. http://www.rebuildamerira.org/reports/survey.html 2/17199 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 7 of 16 . Even among those who believe paying off the debt and tax relief should be higher priorities than infrastructure improvements, fully 60% believe the money spent is an investment in America, while only 33% believe the money disappears once it is spent. It's not just the highly visible infrastructure programs that hold overwhelming public support for additional investment. Many programs, such as wastewater removal systems, have incredibly strong support even though the projects themselves are never seen. But it would be inaccurate to say that infrastructure spending is the lop priority for all Americans. The nation is evenly divided between those that would use the current surplus for debt reduction and tax relief(47%) and those that would rebuild America's infrastructure now (45%). This was one of the few questions where partisanship came into play in a major way. By a 53% to 41% margin, Democrats prefer infrastructure investment to debt reduction and tax relief. Conversely, by a 58% to 37% Republicans want tax relief and debt reduction more than infrastructure investment. Independents, like the nation at large, were evenly split. Two other key findings: . Higher income Americans, those earning more than $70,000 annually, are among the subgroups most likely to support infrastructure investment - even though they stand to gain the most from tax relief. A comparatively solid 55% back the infrastructure investment, while only 38% prefer tax relief and debt reduction. . Those that believe the quality of life in their own neighborhoods is getting better are actually more likely than the population overall to prefer infrastructure investment (49%) rather than debt and tax reduction (44%). The cynicism that poisons so much discussion about government spending has failed to poison the well of infrastructure spending. http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 8 of 16 "Would you be willing to pay 1% more in taxes if it meant you could..." Very/Somewhat Veil/Somewhat ghat Willing Unwilling Guarantee a safe and efficient sewage 74% 21% and water treatment system Have modern schools with basic ring to give our 70% 20°G children computer access Have smooth streets 690A 38% ith no potholes _ dd 50 years of useful life to local 67% 28% bridges and tunnels Have safe, modem 66% 29% and healthy schools Eliminate road congestion in your 62% 33°h area Have fish return to 62% 33% most local waterways e adable street 35% signs, we ell lit streets 59% Remove litter and 56% 31 7% graffiti off roads Improve public 37% 111 transit service levels ear down and replace every coal- 49% 43% Tired, pre-WWII public school Have airports that allow you to take off 40% ° and land on time 50 k �vherever you fly Even with the cost factor included, the American people are prepared to pay more, provided they can get more, to improve the infrastructure. Of the twelve infrastructure components we tested, a majority of the public supported a httpllwww.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htmI 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 9 of 16 tax increase for ten of them, one had plurality support, and only one (airports) was opposed by the public. These results are extraordinary. Too often, pollsters will ask Americans if they support spending initiatives without mentioning the cost factor, thereby providing their clients with an inflated sense of support for their priorities. We took a different approach. Respondents were not asked whether they would like additional spending for the various programs. They were not asked whether additional spending was a good or a bad thing in general. They were asked whether they themselves would "be willing to spend 1% more per year in taxes if it meant that you could..."The question was straight and direct, and it elicited a straight and direct response. THE LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE There is clear consensus surrounding the importance of improving "the infrastructure of education." Given that education is the Number One issue in America today, this consensus is not surprising. What is surprising is that two-thirds of Americans (64%) do not believe the physical condition of public schools buildings in their area have worsened over the past five years, and that a significant percentage of Americans (47%) believe "their local school buildings are pretty much okay as they are." By comparison, only 5% believe the schools in their community need replacement. The remaining percentage desires either repair or modernization. Two findings of note: . The largest demographic difference in attitudes toward the public school infrastructure is between youngest and oldest Americans. Almost half(48%) of 18-29 year olds believe that the physical condition of public school buildings has improved in the past five years, compared to barely more than one-third of those age 65 or older. . There are relatively few differences in attitudes toward school infrastructure by community. Those who live in rural neighborhoods are much more likely to believe the condition of the public school buildings near them have improved than almost any subgroup we examined - but that's the only major regional difference. http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htmi 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 10 of 16 , Urban Suburban Rural Physical condition of public school buildings Better 33% 34% 47% Worse 30% 33% 24% Desired local school building improvement Okay as is 44% 47% 50% $22 billion for repair of school buildings Support 81% 81% 81% Oppose 16% 12% 14% Pay more in taxes for 71% 67% 72% modem school buildings When asked about the ways to best improve the infrastructure of education, a clear hierarchy of preferences emerges, with little variation across demographics. The top priority of the American people is "ensuring a safe and healthy place for our children to learn" (49%), followed by "providing more space to allow for smaller class sizes" (32%), and "providing wiring to give all children access to computers and other technology" (15%). When it comes to the nation's public schools, once again, Americans are ready to put their money where their mouth is. When asked to consider a $22 billion/five year spending proposal to rebuild America's schools, an overwhelming 82% of all Americans favor the measure. And two-thirds of all Americans would be willing to pay 1% more in taxes to "ensure we have modern schools that are safe and healthy." Modem schools matter to Americans. A full 70% of the population would be willing to pay an additional 1% in taxes to provide students with access to computers in the Cf.:3sroom - that's a remarkable fiscal commitment that is second only to ensuring the quality of the water we drink. Taken as a whole, these results conclusively indicate that http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey,html 2/17199 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 11 of 16 Americans are clearly interested in investing in the infrastructure of education and are prepared to pay for that investment with their own money. THE ROADS THEY TRAVEL Perhaps the most immediate way that Americans come into "contact"with infrastructure is when they get into their cars each morning and take to the streets. Whether they live downtown, or in a sprawling suburb or semi-rural community, traffic congestion and road quality is an issue that is increasingly on everyone's mind. Overall, 38% of all Americans think the roads, bridges, and highways in their community have improved in recent years; while 30% say they have gotten worse and 31% have seen no noticeable change. There is a significant dichotomy when Americans are asked to think about "road conditions, traffic, and pedestrians in your community" and how safe they feel. Rural Americans feel safer on the streets - but nobody else does. Not surprisingly, as the subgroup most likely to feel safer on their streets, rural Americans are the least likely of the three regions to fork over additional tax money to "eliminate road congestion" in their community. Fully 68% of the urban population and 66% of the suburban population would personally pay more in taxes to eliminate road congestion, compared to a bare majority of rural residents. Other findings include: . On average, 69% of all Americans would be willing to pay additional tax dollars to "have smooth streets and no potholes," and urban, suburban and rural dwellers feel about the same. . A somewhat less overwhelming 59% are prepared to pay more to have "readable street signs and well lit streets." In this case, regional differences were significant: 65% of urban residents would pay more, compared to 55% among rural citizens. . As the chart below illustrates, commitment among the various demographic segments of the population depends on the specificity of the issue being addressed. People are more willing to volunteer their tax dollars for fixing "potholes and smooth streets" http://www.rebuildamerira.org/reports/survey.htmi 2117/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 12 of 16 , and "adding 50 years to the life of bridges and tunnels," than when asked to consider the more generic "road congestion." THE URBAN - RURAL DIFFERENCE As mentioned throughout this memo, there is significant agreement among urban/suburban Americans and their rural neighbors on a range of infrastructure questions, including the issue of increased spending. However, certain differences of opinion and perception do break down along community lines. The differences are just as worthy of note as the similarities. In particular, rural Americans are more likely than their urban and suburban cousins to feel that the national infrastructure and the individual components are improving rather than worsening. The difference is significant: just 25% of urban residents see overall infrastructure conditions in America improving, compared to 41% among rural residents. Similarly, rural Americas are more likely to evaluate the conditions of their roads, bridges and highways and their public school buildings positively than almost every other subgroup examined in this survey. Everyone wants a better infrastructure, and everyone is willing to pay. But the urbanites are more ready and more willing. Specifically, the urbanites we surveyed had higher percentage responses in the following categories: Total Percentage Percentage of Issue calling to Support a Urbanites Willing 1%Tax Hike to Support Removing 56% 74% graffiti Replace old schools Improve public 68% transit Have well lit 11 59% 65°k streets/signs And while a clear majority of Americans are willing to cough up additional tax dollars for the specific purpose of improving certain aspects of the national infrastructure, there is consistently a greater intensity of support for infrastructure investment among urban residents than their rural counterparts. This finding is important because hftp://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey-htmi 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 13 of 16 it exists entirely irrespective of other demographics. In general, it is proper to conclude that while there are certain differences of perception between urban and rural residents, these differences are mostly a matter of degree. Regardless of the demographics considered, Americans have a remarkably across-the-board outlook on the questions we asked them to consider in this survey. PARTY POLITICS Those who live and work inside the Washington Beltway may have become accustomed to partisan rancor and bickering, but there are still a few issues that transcend party politics. America's infrastructure is one of those issues. Outside the Beltway, the American people support government spending on infrastructure, regardless of party affiliation. The willingness to spend more tax dollars on infrastructure investment also transcends party lines, carrying a majority of Republicans as well as independents and Democratic support. In generic terms, two-thirds of Republicans describe infrastructure spending as a"strong investment in America" while just 28% describe it as "money that disappears." Democrats hold identical views: 70% say it is a strong investment, and 25% describe it as money that disappears. Republicans, independents, and Democrats alike equally describe the infrastructure as an important component in determining the quality of life in their communities. In fact, 69% of Republicans, 73% of independents, and 71% of Democrats rate the quality of infrastructure as either "very" or"extremely important" in determining their overall satisfaction with the community they live in. And when evaluating specific infrastructure changes over the past five years, from road conditions to drinking water, similarities in results among members of both parties were more common than differences. And both parties show a clear willingness to invest more in specific infrastructure projects. While Democrats are more likely to spend more money than their Republican counterparts, support for additional taxpayer dollars for specific infrastructure does cut across partisan lines. http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 14 of 16 "Would you be willing to pay 1% more in taxes if it meant you could..." (those with the greatest% "willing") j GOP W15ER (Guarantee a safe and efficient sewage 66°6 75°� 81% and water treatment system Have smooth streets with no potholes 65 1% 75% Have modem schools with basic wiring to 65% 64% 60°k give our children access to corn uters dd 50 years of useful life to local bridges 59°h 69°k 769%] and tunnels Have modem schools that are safe and 58°6 7°6 73% healthy CONCLUSION The public's perception of progress in fixing, building and expanding the infrastructure is instrumental to their continuing willingness to support infrastructure investment and maintenance. It is a truism in American politics that nobody knows what the people want better than the people themselves. Some might be tempted to make the assumption that infrastructure is a topic that the American people wouldn't be talking much about. That it's too esoteric, too remote and technical -that it wouldn't exactly make up the banter around the dinner table. But the results of this survey prove this view completely wrong. Americans realize that infrastructure is more than an abstract term. Infrastructure is about the water they drink, the roads they drive on, and the schools their children attend. It is about the most basic and important elements of one's life. And the American people, by an overwhelming majority, see it as just that: an investment. In these heady economic times, there is another cynical force at work: the assumption that people will be interested only in bettering their own lot, not the lot of their nation. Again, this survey sets the record straight. Americans are ready and willing to commit their hard earned dollars to the continued improvement of their country's vital infrastructure. Across demographic groups, party affiliations, and the urban-rural divide, this commitment is remarkably solid. http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 15 of 16 Indeed, infrastructure is an example of increasingly rare phenomena in our political discourse: something that practically everybody agrees on. And given Americans' normally visceral rejection of Uncle Sam dipping further into their pocketbooks, their readiness to a financial commitment is that much more notable. One reason why the infrastructure consensus exists is that people across America, in small towns, large cities and expanding suburbs, have been seeing real change - and it has not been change for the worse. They have been seeing improvements in some areas -their public transportation systems, in their roads, bridges, and their highways. And where they have not been seeing improvement, they at least see room for it. The American people do acknowledge the improvements that have already been achieved in their infrastructure, but they also believe there are challenges yet to be met - particularly in areas involving clean water. The people are ready and anxious to take the next step to improve conditions around them. Is Washington listening? APPENDIX: INFRASTRUCTURE'S LIGHTER SIDE Never put it past Americans to find humor in any situation. Even on a subject as seemingly esoteric and distant as the infrastructure, people are willing to laugh and see the lighter side to the challenges they know we all face. These questions are meant not only to provide some comic relief but to strengthen the case for infrastructure development, with a keen eye to media attention. . When asked whether they would rather drink city tap water or cough syrup, "Urban H2O" came in first (70%) - but an astonishing quarter (24%) of all people surveyed said they'd rather take the nasty medicine! . Thinking about a typical visit to the nearest airport, a quarter (26%) said that "No Way Out" was a more appropriate movie-title motto for the experience, compared to the majority (62%)who favored "In and Out" . Returning to the theme of schools and their physical conditions, Americans were asked to pick a "theme song" - and by just a ten point margin, "Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head" (39%)was narrowly http://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2117/99 Infrastructure and Legislative Updates - Rebuild America Coalition Page 16 of 16 , trumped by 'That's the Way I Like It" (49%). . Perhaps the most stunning result came when considering the "hot button"topic of water quality. Nearly a third of all Americans would rather take a swim in water from their toilet bowl (37%) than from the nearest river (57%). This perfectly illustrates in a more visceral way the sense of immediate concern for the quality and condition of the water supply in America. Who We Are— Events— Local Chapters— Infwstrudure &Leoislative Update Member Omanizations—Contact Us—Members Onlv— Home http //www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.html 2/17/99 Cause of n mistaken ga..pYr rs - W IL R � / ei i dumping 6 es za, ?�probed A look at what %ed ~, r RtwRort may have led to the a w aua goof in the Upper New- port Bay dredging pro- ject and its potential Audi consequences. Is dumping site ends, By ODWA County SON The Orange County Register NEWPORT BEACH—The En- vironmental Protection Agency will investigate how, when and where a subcontractor dumped The Orange Counry Register 600.000 cubic yards of silt and sediment in the wrong ocean spot ON MFMO S since the Upper Newport Bay dredging project started a year The EPA is investigating how ago a contractor dredging Upper Human error may be to blame Newport gay dumped for the wrong coordinates en. 600,000 cubic yards of muck tered into the Global Positioning in the wrong place in the System,a navigation tool SolfFlo ocean.Story on Mew t Partners LP used to locate what it thought was a federally ap proved dumping site. ment team for the EPA. "You Q. Why is the bay being dredged? can go to Costco and buy your A. The county hired SoliFlo in own handheld GPS." 1997 to clear the bay—a refuge Brusco Barge and Tug, the for fish and migratory birds — SoliFlo subcontractor hired to and shares responsibility for the haul the mud out to sea,entered project with the company and the coordinates. the state Department of Fish and "They believe they made sort Game. SoHFlo was hired to re- of an unthinking error when they move about g00,000 cubic yards first plugged in the coordinates, of benign sediment from the bay and it stuck." Ross said. "It with a clamshell dredge si struck for 600,000(cubic)yards.A The mud and sand accumulates small number difference can add naturally in the bay,and the area up to thousands of feet." had not been dredged for a de The Computer has since been Cade. - reprogrammed and SoliFlo re- Q. What is a Global Positioning sumed the project. System? Q. Will the dumping enor harm A. GPS is a common navi the mean habitatt tio l tool that relies on satellites determine to determine latitude and longi. A. The EPA-approved dump rude coordinates for commermer- ab spot, known as L.A.unlikely is vial, military and recreational about ude se et dreg marine habi. vessels. The Army Corps of En.tes to include sensitive marine s in- to the county the coordinates tat, Ross said. The agency's in- to the county and SolDaniel spokes- es- vestFlo'igationwit dumping if Soli. in.cording to Fluor Daniel spokes- clod incorrect dumping site N- - woman Lisa Boys h duded fish andother canyons and reefs "GPS systems have gotten vital m fish and other wildlife. very cheap and very accurate," The dumping probably will not said Brian Ross,a me man the affect gray-whale migration, dredging and sedimentat manage Ross said. FaxA lent 00V&Aw amsaw'�'� January 19, 1999 AMSA Briefs Senate Environment & Pahlic Works Committee Last week, AMSA briefed Senate Environment& Public Works Committee staff on the Association's legislative priorities for the 106m Congress. While stressing the importance of the Urban Wet Weather Management Act of 1999, nonpoint source pollution control and stepped up federal funding for CSOs, SSOs, stormwater and nonpoint source controls, AMSA also informed Senate staff of the Association's stance on other key issues including TMDLs, Superfund, pretreatment, watershed management, the Municipal Biological Monitoring Act of 1999 and the Arid West Water Quality Act. AMSA explained to Senate staff the problems facing wastewater agencies as a result of EPA's current TMDL program and notified them of the Association's new TMDL guidance encouraging dischargers to intervene in the TMDL process to protect their rights. AMSA suggested to the committee staff that TMDLs, as they are currently applied, might be ripe for legislative action to fa nagging problems such as growth restrictions and the potential exemption of nonpoint sources. AMSA also requested the Senate's help in securing -- $1.775 million to support the National Biosolids Partnership. Currently AMSA is drafting letters to the Chairmen of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees— Sen. Christopher Bond(R-Mo.)and Rep. James Walsh(D-N.Y.)—requesting further federal support for the partnership. Nationwide Survey Shows Strong Support For Wastewater Funding The 1999 Rebuild America Infrastructure Survey—released January 27— shows overwhelming support for federal spending on a wide array of infrastructure including"7aztsportation, sanitation and water quality." AMSA is a member of the Rebuild America Coalition, an organization of 60 public and private groups that are focusing attention at all levels of government on strengthening the nation's inhastructure. Of those polled,66 percent considered infrastructure spending a"strong investment in America." In fact, 55 percent believes that more federal dollars directed to wastewater agencies would have a"noticeable" effect on wastewater treatment. The survey supports AMSA's position that more federal money is necessary to maintain existing wastewater infrastructure and at the same time address the challenges posed by wet weather in the form of agricultural mmoft combined and sanitary sewer overflows(CSOs and SSOs) and stormwater. It also demonstrates that the public understands the clear connection between federal dollars and cleaner water. Interestingly, the survey shows public support for watershed-based clean water regulation. For example, 61 percent favor an approach"that focuses on an overall coordinated plan that takes into account all environmental concerns"rather than one that"focuses on the specific, known sources of pollution." The survey suggests that the public would support more federal money to balance the current ratio of local dollars to federal dollars spent to safeguard water quality. The entire survey is available on the web at hrp.#/ .rebuddamenca.org. > Clarification/AMSA's Peak Performance Awards Program(see Member Update 99-1) Platinum Awards are presented to member agency facilities who have received Gold Awards for five consecutive years. According to Board of Directors policy, "the award of Platinum Awards is not rolling. Upon receipt of a Platinum Award, a facility must receive Gold Awards for the next five consecutive years to again qualify." We hope this clarifies questions regarding eligibility for Platinum Awards, and we apologize for any confusion caused by the omission of this information from Member Update 99-1. McIntyre, Donald From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Tuesday,January 26, 1999 5:32 PM To: Tuchman, Michelle; Ludwin, David Cc: McIntyre, Donald Subject: RE: Public Hearings re Garfield Bridge They have hearings every night rotating thru the affected cities. They are scoping under the notice of preparation requirements of CEOA. -----Original Message..... From: Tuchman. Michelle es Sant: Tuday,January 26, 1999 9:26 AM Ta: Ludwin, D.Ad Cc: Anderson. Blake;McIntyre, Donald Subject: Public Hearings to Garfield Bridge I understand that OCTA is holding public hearings this week on a possible bridge on Garfield. Are we sending anyone to listen to the comments and find out what OCTA is planning...or is it too early In the process for us? Michelle Tuchman Director of Communications Orange County Sanitation District 714.592-7120 714.962.0356 (fax) mtuchman@ocsd.com 1 High Court Set filed a e osa-complaint against all water Dispute Over Rights users from lust upstream of Barstow to the river's headwaters in the San Bernardino mounTo Pump Water The'laN$. The'Physical Solution' o Hear Case Superior Court Judge E.Mlchael Kaiser yg 7up/) �g .Goes to High Court responded by freezing litigation m die 01U Water •w• aW matter to allowtudy a special s hyd committee of ex- nd L pens to stucti We hash's hydrology aM ConrinuedAomPapeCAf water production. "ground subsidence,decreased waler rolled ritehly apportion- solution-water among Me sought quality increased costa to pump from con- to ion's many secs. A er au among ge By MARC I.IFSHER theunderground nd increasing depths,capacity. of Kaisers many users. Afle[a Vial.Judge svaS neB ric'nardiofT o Cams' farimeIEM Oavnd fit ately.gm plate rage exhaustion of andMe un- Kaiser including the the alfalfa farmers and San Bernardino c ties am farmers and compound complete exhaustion of the ter denies.Inwho never the greed t fanners and its tingover war ,cities are once again Agency supply: die Mojave Water dairymen Theremin appealed. objecting thing to Clow resource. my t isregion's me, the most pre- Agency warns in a legal brief.he IM acre n'sreq irers requirement that hatforced them to to ay thous resource. Only this Clore, the legal four k enough th rnwater Californiaserve toesneeds oldof afor marketpnces for tan f water consmned HighDesertls could spread far beyond the typical Southern Cel household for above fixed quotas set by the Mojave Wa. High Desert region where the dispute be- lwoyealeg ter Agency. In a decision published last The legal arguments Napan gem. of extremely"want to shut charges. June, the stale Cann of Appeal In San The to with Mojave Water Agency,a taking thewtte ohm dawn ng to farmers BernardinoTagreedollNthefarmers. and the contractor with the Stale Water Project, banner ,- says the Tamers' lawyer, the laced tit to large number of unreasonably andthe cities small Barstow and Hesperia are Rosiness," says the of Ontario. . High cultural interests wllWaseprouction and battling asmall Robert E. Dougherty of Ontario. High cmlurelinterests will cease and p g group of alfalfa a�north Desert land, without water rights, isn't transfer their base annual production N producers Irom the Hinkle Valle north the murinpalltles," observed Justice of Vicmrviile, over the most basic of all aroM diddiy squat:he Says. Thomas Hollenhorst,writing for a=am- Onthecontrary,farmersam-goingout moos three-member anal. And Me tan property rights: the ownership of under- and saying.'1've got kinl; f-the-mountain a p ground water.The contest—which the Cal. pointedlydkregardedlhe fanners'Wston- ifornia Supreme Court is expected to hear cal"priority water righk,"the panel said. later this year—could decide just who con- ,' HEfundamen- because the city-dominated drafting cam- lrols the State's still la unre mitten considered such rights unfair. ryel Y gm ated But Ignoring Nose historic water ground-water supplies. tat question is: rights—even to-equitablyapportion water At stake,says the California Farm But. rights to all producers in an overdraned Mau Federation, Is the integrity of 150 ..Can someone With a groundwater basin...overlooks well-ser- years of water-law precedent in a state tied principles of water law,"Justice Hot- that depends on Irrigation to grow crops on "'— lenhorst wrote.He Concluded that lanners eight m ,inion acres of otherwise and land. 'historic right to under, have the same rights to pump ground-wo Any alteration of farmers'historic trailer. -- _ ter as do landowners who take water from nothing rivers,lakes and streams. ship of water as"vested property rights," ;.,ground Water pump it Barstow and Its allies have petitioned the bureau Warns in court documents,"will �___ ____ the state Supreme Court to review the ap- significantly Impact farmers and ranchers even When doWnstrearn pellate panel's decision—and all parties in in all parts of the state." thecase are,at the least,collector the high In terms of water law, "this Is the big '—'—'—"—"— — --- court M make the rules plain. one," says farm bureau attorney David 'users face Shortfalls? Taking Sides Guy. "This goes t0 the heart of water Interestingly. Ne settlement imposed rights.Do they mean anything in the 21st by the Superior Court had been endorsed century. or can courts just simply appor. water rights.I got mine.and you don't got by the state Department of Fish and Game. any.-counters the city of Barstow's error- a party in the original lawsuit.That sup lion water rights away,as they tried to do Day.Arthur G.Kid of costa afesa. port,however,evaporated at the Court of down there in Mojave?" The battle,the tint ground-water issue Appeal after the farm bureau convinced Whose Right to Pump? N come before the state Supreme Court In the administration of former Republican The Supreme Corot case is Bled to 25 years.has been a long time mewing.It Gov. Pete Wilson to back away from the P ape first bubbled up in the late 1980s.when the case,say attorneys involved I,the mrga- flddress a lundamentm question about Cal- state Water Resources Comml Board de- lion.Mr.Guy,the farm bureau lawyer.de- IfOrNO water law:Can someone with a his- med a request from Barstow for authority tars his organization pressured the gover. toric right to an underground water supply Nrommandeerm...water from upstream noes office. pump AS much as he or she wants—even wars. Clues, however, now are hoping Nat when dowrmtreem users, such as rapidly So the city and its water company Democratic Gov.Gray Davis will Duck Me developing cities.lace potential shortfalls? tumee to the count.In less,they filed suit farm lobby and at least file a friendol-the- against the Mojave Water Agency.the city court brief backing when users calk for That is exactly the case in the 3,600-squaw of Adelanm and dozens of upstream water more water. mile Mojave River basin where the city of Mara,claiming that the defendants were Environmental groups, for now. say Barstow and Its water supplier, privately continuing to interfere with Barstow's am- they're staying Out of the courtroom fray held Southern California Water Co.,have far supply. The complaint, flied in River- soil are looking Instead to the state Legjs- been confronting aworsening"overdraft" side County Superior Court, asked for a long N clarify the ownership."No matter of available water. writ compelling Me water agency In in- which side wins, the right place, Win. crease impom from the State Water Pro malely, to get these Issues addressed I,The basfnwide shortfall,which reached crease mmeafojave SeenmeRW."says Tom Gruff.an aftarney an estimated one million Bore feet by 1990, River Basin. with Me Environmental Defense Fuld in threatened the region'r250,000 residents The Mojave hater Agency, in turn. Canons. Pfense nor to Page CA4,Column J ueanup vi a for waterways in ]News FGo ie Fnile. _ �c ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP'.) ell this way for apartment rental Wednesday, and vary 20.1999 Cleanup OKd for Waterways in L.A. Area .Health: Landmark EPA agreement will set pollution limits to make water safe for people and aquatic life. By MARU CONE, Times Ena-wonmenia/Writer n a far-reaching decision that could eventually force RELATED sweeping lifestyle changes for millions of people, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has agreed to set O.C.SECTIONS pollution limits that aim to make all beaches and waterways MAIN PAGE throughout Los Angeles and Ventura counties safe for people and aquatic life. NEWS BY The EPA's agreement—which settles a lawsuit filed by the COMMUNITY environmental groups Heal the Bay and Santa Monica SPORTS BayKeeper--is considered a momentous event in the decades- long struggle to clean up Santa Monica Bay and a slew of PREP SPORTS highly polluted rivers, creeks and lakes. The accord comes after the EPA for 20 years failed to ensure that the waters were safe BUSINESS and clean,as mandated by federal law. SO CAL LIVING Ultimately,said Mark Gold,executive director of Heal the Bay,the new strategy will guide everything from how CALENDAR subdivisions are built and streets are cleaned to the quality of waste discharged by sewage treatment plants. CALENDAR "This is a very, very far-reaching action.The ramifications WEEKEND are far beyond setting a number and hoping we reach it," Gold HOME DESIGN said. "This completely changes the game on how water quality is regulated." COMMENTARY The new limits are to be set gradually over 13 years, 7.V.TIMES beginning with one this December. The goal is for beaches and more than 130 water courses, including the Los Angeles, San Gabriel and Santa Clara rivers,to be safe for recreation-- swimming,surfing and fishing—as well as protective of creatures that live there. ADVERTISEMENT The agreement is not expected to have an immediate effect on Orange County waterways. ® From lead and copper feces and trash, standards called "total maximum daily loads" will define precisely how much of each pollutant a water segment can withstand daily. Cities, http://www.latimes.comMOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.htmi 1/20N9 uteanup una ror waterways in L.A.Area �s� -�• industries,sewage treatment plants and other sources that cause the pollution will be allowed to generate a specific share of that Jyl�•• total 4 Officials will now be forced to address all the pollution problems of each watershed as a whole, especially storm water runoff--the massive volume of oil,metals,bacteria and other Y/SA debris that flows into rivers and the ocean from streets, freeways,yards and other urban surfaces. In the past, state agencies have issued one permit at a time to each industry and sewage plant and have done little to clean up runoff. "This is cutting-edge stuff,especially in an urban context," said the EPA's regional administrator, Felicia Marcus. "It means people can look forward to even cleaner waters to enjoy in the future." No One Knows What Limits Will Be The prospect of the unprecedented limits,however,worries many municipalities, sewage treatment officials and others who must eventually comply. A coalition of county and city sanitation districts plans to file a motion this week in federal court to intervene and block the agreement. The overriding concern is the uncertainty—no ones knows what the limits will be,what it could cost to comply,and whether there are any viable solutions to reduce the contamination,said Sharon Green, government affairs analyst of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. "We hope it will lead to water quality improvements,but we're concerned about it leading to requirements that simply cannot be met or that will require costly treatment," she said. Los Angeles Councilwoman Ruth Galanter plans to ask the council today to "bless the agreement" and refuse to let the city participate in legal challenges. "Cleaner water means improved quality of life,not only for the people who live here but those who visit here," she said. "It would send a really terrible message for the city to mm around and say we don't care about clean water." State Officials Expected to Set Standards The task is gargantuan--assigning about 750 specific pollution limits--but EPA officials agreed to deadlines that will be phased in through 2011. The beaches,Malibu Creek and the Los Angeles River will be among the first to be tackled. State water quality officials are expected to set the limits, but the EPA will oversee the procedure. The deadlines, however,are only for when the limits will be set,not when they will be complied with--which could take years longer. "This is a road map that gets us to clean water," said David Beckman,a Natural Resources Defense Council attorney who represented the environmentalists. "It's not the end, but it's the beginning of the end." Dennis Dickerson,executive officer of the state's Regional Water Quality Board for the two counties,called the new approach "a very essential way to go." "We generally see this as a very positive development," he said. The limits "are very labor-intensive and rather an arduous process,but we are very committed to doing them and we http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.html 1/20/99 �iewwp vnu iur w au rwaya in ar.r,.. ca intend to make them work." The Clean Water Act required the pollution limits to be set by 1979 for all waters in the United States that are considered unsafe for people and aquatic life. But 20 years past that deadline,the EPA and the state have not set a single limit for any of the 156 water body segments that are polluted in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. Beckman said the EPA "did absolutely nothing" on that issue. EPA officials say they failed to set the limits because they wanted to first address the nation's most pressing water pollution problems--through two decades of costly and controversial cleanup at sewage treatment plants and industries across the country. Now that those threats are largely resolved,regional EPA administrator Marcus said, it is time to address the multitude of sources--especially urban streets—that are still keeping so many waters unsafe. "Times have changed,and watershed planning is now the way to go," she said. "It would have been hard to do this the right way 20 years ago,but people now are ready to do it." Even though thousands of U.S.waterways violate the Clean Water Act,only a scattering of limits have been set elsewhere in the country,including Oregon and Georgia. Southern California lags behind largely because of the enormity of dealing with urban waters contaminated by bacteria-laden street runoff from millions of people. Los Angeles and Ventura counties "are not alone. Many - other states and most of California have not pursued" the limits,water board official Dickerson said. Environmentalists have filed similar lawsuits in 29 other states, including 12 where the EPA faces a court order to develop the permits,Beckman said. Beaches in much of Los Angeles County are frequently closed to swimming because of fecal waste from runoff.A few years ago, a USC study showed that people who swim at beaches new storm drains have a nearly 50%increase in colds, diarrhea and other illnesses soon after swimming. The government has less than three years to set the pollution limits that aim to make beaches in Los Angeles County safe for swimming, and less than four years for Ventura County. About 100 cities contribute to the coliform bacteria count--a sign of human or animal waste in runoff. The most challenging part of all the new limits will be the bacteria and viruses at beaches because no one knows where, precisely,they come from. This also is one of the most critical aspects of the cleanup because polluted beaches have a big impact on public health and the local economy. But there is far more than the ocean at stake.About 130 urban rivers, creeks, lakes and other waters in the two counties contain excessive amounts of some form of pollution that makes them unsafe for swimming,fishing or aquatic life. The new strategy means divvying up the pollution load. Cleaning up the contamination will now become more like the region's program to clean up smog--a certain level of pollution is deemed healthful,then officials regulate virtually everything that contributes. For example, Ballona Creek,which flows from downtown http://www.tatimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000006013.html 1120/99 l Leanup Vnu Aur waterway) In L.A.tuna rage Y ui M Los Angeles to the ocean at Marina del Rey,contains hazardous amounts of zinc,copper,lead and three other metals. ' Under the agreement,a maximum will be set by late 2003 for each pollutant and specific allocations will be made for each of the various industries, Los Angeles County and the four cities of Los Angeles,Culver City, West Hollywood and Beverly Hills. At Malibu Creek,a limit will be set by December 2001 for algae-creating nutrients such as nitrogen that come from sewage and fertilizer. Cities and grazing operations upstream will be allocated certain shares. In Ventura County,Calleguas Creek is a highly contaminated waterway containing metals,pesticides and other compounds. An overall limit will be set for each one, and then allocations will be made to the upstream farms,cities,sewage treatment plants and industries. Deal May Ease Load on Some Polluters Controversies and legal challenges are bound to erupt over how the state or EPA sets the individual limits. However,the new strategy might actually ease the burden on polluters,called point sources,that have already been highly regulated--such as the Chevron oil refinery in El Segundo and sewage treatment plants. Instead,more of the burden might be put on cities and agriculture. "It means finally there will be an equitable distribution,a responsibility that matches contribution," Beckman said. But Green of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts worries that much of the burden could still fall on the sewage treatment plants because it will be too complicated to deal with urban runoff that comes from all over the region. Environmentalists wanted nearer deadlines,but they said those in the agreement were the best they could negotiate with the EPA because of limits on government resources. Cop ry ight 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,WATER POLLUTION POLLUTION C NTROL,OCEAN POLLUI ION,HAZARDOUS MATERIALS--DISPOSAL,GOVERNMENT REGULATI N UTILITIES—ORANGE COUNTY. YOU will not be charg to look for stories,only to retrieve one. (Iwa http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000006013.html 1/20/99 1�{�iz1Jl Ate•. ,r . Thursday,Jafwery 2H,19B9 .; Future watet' demand may result in loss of farmland No Ram's pop algllonis forend .exisig water acme a% which has PoW a water use and supplies In that County wig see a shorlege by 2020. cvltmer. � to double 2M fa IA �. farmem worried state by 2020. The rest of the state, howeve; is Water wont be diverted from h1 ty 9 Arens with water accent will be In Statewide. D Wulabon is expected expwtedtobreak even , adds W tandea Pe1M; hoes and oroom; n wnYl acem. demand for housing and Industry, to increase from M I million in 19M New water supplies are essential, Industry wm take over famlmd ni ri and farmland meets dud pmfdc,said to v.6mmion in 2o2o. C ettol said but the area wont see pop ilatlen in search of areas soM5 ByWFl•IDYOWEN vneetsnd farm eryerta But the populations m Kern and than by 20P.0. water moves is rue ta,aet.,er Moment woriiea®me alter learn- sdlerent coumiea to the south, San TM tine to develop these new . itettol predicted an,lrpdsi08'�' emr:veaevaa.aayieuaom mg about the Mace ofwater during a Bernardino and Riverside, are waersuppars isyestaday,'he said because ofthe lark of water at 20, Kern Candi'a Population tr pro- dlpctvsion Wednesday of a state expected to take the brunt of the CrMDI said he-is hustrated with and it will be rvsalved in the vbthl jeted to double to about L2 million water plan by Jeanine Jones, chid increase with 100 percent mare peo- den bickering'going on between the booth through legislation or pup M,� means WOOD mare people water planner for the California ple - groups waking on developing new urban candidates- s apartmentofwaLwHes mcm Ton depasssW and ran Ctutol, ware sources;— agriculture, tndus• 'In shout we will low he'�• will rwed water to&A soak their Jones gave anoverv1ew of sine Cali- president of the Kem County pbrm try,urban ande nimnmerM groups. Meertrng to the Mmers,who will.ba lawns,aashtheir lsandry,rake show, foda Were Plan to the water Asa, Bureau 'Nothing is being aocomDtidud,' vastly outnumbered by urban era and Bush theirta0es lotion of Kern County In BakeraLdd Projections show the water region M sud.'Wbere are you going W get dwellers It also manna an eta disin on The CaliforniaWater Plan •. �;". predicts aovoing the western half of Kam the wale wlthnnm taking LLfromagd- PYlw anYaU1B/p i WATER: califon-da wilflose 300,000 acres of no land COMM hMA1 Water Asacclaaon of Kem County, hopes the groups can resolve their Rurn Bureau Executive Director dtdnt take such a dim view of the issues bemuse the loss of lmrrdand in iron Hudgengnxd , Nhme Kem Count ave y would h farreactung 'Somethings.going to give and Its He believes the new water supplies effedsto she rest of the nation. probably going to be ag,'he acrid will Bow on time. Kern County is a top supplier of The-plan sinews California losing Tm a httie more optimistic than many IMM nuts and vegetables to Wool) saes of bvgatrd ag land to Jim(GMWQordiat,'hesatd US.and oversaasmarkets. residential and tachua •growth. - • Ke=,TuIme and Rag Gulch Water But m the longrem,.he said The Gwe- l.undgmst, widen[ of the Districts manager B*SDwes said he urban§gathevotes.' {) � 1 O.C. water projects included in Clinton's proposed budget POLITICS: $1.5 million letting it seep into the grbundwa- 1D tDlldln would be a ter supply so it eventually be g used far drinking and other uses. boost to reclamation - .It's a significant victory in getting the water reclamation Plan• project under way,"mid Lee Go, By NWtiiN WISCKtx down, chief of staff for Rep. Lo- The Orange County Register retta Sanchez, D-Santa Ma. Orange County water-related Other water projects include: projects received a boost from ►The San Juan Creek water- °a President Clinton's proposed shed would receive $414,000 to • budget, with-a total of S25.7 mil- study how to stabilize erosion, lion set aside. prevent flooding and restore the The biggest of these—$20 mil- natural habitat. -` lion for the Seven Oaks Dam ►Newport Bay would receive i flood control project in the San $240,000 for dredging and mainte- Bernardino portion of the Santa aspen. 1 .� Ma River — was identified im. _ ►The Allan Creek watershed 'tnediately when Clinton's budget would receive $161,000 to study .was released Monday. M addi- how to stabilize erosion,prevent tional $3 million for the opera- flooding and restore the natural dons of the Prado and Seven habitat. , . Oaks dams was anticipated. • ►The San Diego Creek,, - , But the additional$2.65 million g An water projects was not found feeds into the upper Newport by local Congress members until . Bay,would get$140,000 for study h'uesday. -....on how to stabilize the creek and . The biggest chunk of Toes- reduce the amount of sediment day's findings was S1.S million being carried into the c eek::. toward the $240 million.Orange I-The Santa Ana,Rlyer basin in County-Regional States%Recla-,i Orange County would :: get Snation Project.The project calla S100,000 to study how to further for taking -highly purified improve it, and portiois up. ,wastewater, shipping it to is re- stream of Orange County would ?charge basin in Anaheim, hod get another S100,000 for study.` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC A"Alfts C rMlctl A1WD PUBLICATION San Diego union-Tribune eaemoPanranuzrfs oamtaorsoursenN uuroaN" DATc January 13 , 1999 S R"s toilet-to-tap water plan should halt, science board says By Kathryn Balint drys sewers. The project, which was concep. rruv wsrrea ]¢stead of mm8 the purified sew- The cityof San Diego's plan to a e water for drimldn , the hood really approved by the state Da" g g partment of Health Services.wddld turn sewage water into drinking suggests in its report that the dry be the brat of its kind in California water has elicited widely divergent use it for landscaping and industrial and only the second in the nation. views, not just from ordinary citi- uses. The dry has already spent Cg was but from scientists,engineers Board member William Nieren- million in research on the projedE and other experts as well. burg. former director of Scripps But last month, Mayor Susan G& Four months ago. a'blue-nbbon Institution of Oceanography, said ding announced her opposition to it, panel of experts" from across the the dry should be commended for Citing concerns about its safetyV4 country,assembled by the National pursuing the project, and that he its cast,she said she would not.put Water Resources Institute, can- doesn't want to see the city stop it on the City Cound's agenda,tthhus eluded that the citys project would recycling waste water altogether. blocking a vote and prohibiting'fbe be"safe and appropriate." He said it is appropriate to use project from being built while shell Yesterday, a panel of local ex- recycled waste water for irrigation in office. perts—with credentials equally as or industrial use. Siam then, David Schlesinger; impressive as the blue-ribbon panel The Science Advisory Board, director of the wastewater depart- -disagreed. which studied the city's sewage pu- meet. said work on the project has The county's Science Advisory nficatioa plans for almost a year, been stopped. Board, in putting the finishing tou- makes recommendations to the It appears now that theproje". ches on its report, said it isn't can- county Board of Supervisors. The all but dead. —' vinced that the city's $154 million notion of purifying sewage,howev- The City Council's Natural Re- purification project would be safe. er,came mot from the county board, sources and Culture Committee. The sevem members of the board but from the city of San Diego s which initially had been scheduled who attended yesterday's meeting Metropolitan Wastewater Depart- to discuss the project next w"K agreed that the project should not meat has rescheduled that meeting 4s proceed. They said long-term epi- As the project is envisioned,sew- March 10. ^^ demiolegical studies and a surveil- age would undergo multiple treat- bnm of potential health effects mums, then be piped to the San Schlesinger said that,despite the must be conducted'to reassure the Vicente Reservoir southeast of Po- county Seamm Advisory Board's people of San Diego that there is no way.There,the purified waste wa- opinion,be still firmly believes that health harard.' ter would min with raw drinking the purified sewage water wouldbe "What we are worried about here water from the Colorado River and sale for drinking. He said he hopes is the production and use of new other sources, then be treated to obtain the council's permissibfi chemicals;said board member S.S. again using conventional water to release to the public the volumi- Penner, director emeritus of the treatment,before flowing from the nous environmental documents Center for Energy sod Combustion faucen of San Diegans that the city has prepared to shtn Research at the University of Cali- Waste-water officials had hoped that the project would pose no mare fornia San Diego. to have the project operating by of a health risk than the city's cur- He and other panelists expressed 2002. rent drinking water supply- women that toxic or potentially harmful wastes flushed into the sewers by the biotech industry weld escape the multiple water treatment processes proposed by the dry and end up in the drinking water supply. But the panel said it didn't want to single out biotechnology re- search companies because there are others,such as pesticide users, that also discharge potentially harmful contaminants into the Around Town Valley Voices What's your most romantic fantasy date? Go on an Watch a sunset Fly to Paris evening cruise ��rr in Maui with and go to in Mauna Lani, `f ^• 4' actress Nikki dinner on a Hawaii with I ilk Taylor. boat cruise my husband. y �' Minh Dan ® with my Carol husband. Glover Sue Borkchardt �t Have dinner Ride the Go on a picnic and see a Amtrak to San alone with my movie with Juan boyfriend to singer Capistrano the beach. Courtney �, with my it. Cristina Love. and have r Tobler Jim Cerda �.. dinner by candlelight in a restaurant that has a 1 piano player. Frank Smith Have actor Take my Spend two Antonio nancee to Big _ nights with my Sabato Jr.pick Bear,have ifeon me up in a dinner,sit by sy Catalina in a limo,spread r' the fire and _ room with no roses at my -• watch the telephone, feet and then movie,"The television, ` 'ii ny me to Paris Greatest Love radio or for dinner and Story Ever <� agendas to walk under the Told." read. - stars. Lawrence John Collins Vivi Boang Reyes Mayor Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings 11 Name of Paper Section I Page # Date Subject The A l-Ria Se a /�Da Today, Ivangorod confronts a modest The Estonian government, which has Two Towns Fight but subversive Challenge from ac ors the forkedoutcashin thepasttofootpartoflvan- g icy water.Its fce doesn't want territory.It gorod's sewage and water bill.a now consul- TT1�� just wants Russia to pay its bills. ering further -humanitarian aid" to again 1_/Znyr ¢rid a River Like most Russian towns,Ivangorod is help thhR headquarters Iowa rs Cover Axrvmentfees.hie broke.Anywhere else in Russia,this would once-shared water utility, director t.the Runs Through It hardly mamer.The Country shrugs off debt Era keeps Ivangorod'swater unpaid bills in a sel s and lives on barter.But Ivangorod (which bulging purple folder. They total S1.3 mil- mean's Ivan's Town in Russian) has a lion.'They are definitely ourmost difficult Russians Can't Pay the Tab. problem: It buys its water from Estonia customers.-he groans. Estonians Turn Off the Tap; and processes its sewage across the bor- Mr.En started to get heavy last tanu- P der,too.And there they want cash. ary. He cut water supplies by half. Ivan- "They begged me to turn the tap back gpypd quickly coughed up some cash and Sewage Is Sweet Revenge on.' says Narva's acting mayor,Ants I.A. got its water back.When payments again tmers.the man Ms.KoStIMMa bad pleaded dried up, Mr. Era again closed the tap By A.NDnew HlnGma with by telephone.-They think this is polit- Smj)nepaeVra/Tpc W S,tc,J...pw ical.But it a a very simple economic prob- a FlNIANO IVANGOROD, Russia—Under threat lem.We aren't Communists here anymore. wins _ from implacable forces across the river,of. R you don't pay,you don't get." The dis. ficials in this decrepit Russian border town pure,he says.is a"clash of two systems.' haaaoroe huddled in a snowy wood on New Year's Indeed,the tale of the two cities traces Eve fortifying their feeble defenses. In a the divergent paths taken since the bridge xana e last-ditch plea for mercy, Deputy Mayor between them became a noDdlii border °tannic 2' Antonina Kostitsina tracked down the en- post back in 1991. Under the Soviet Union. emy on his mobile telephone."I begged for they were inseparable, sharing water. ESTONIA the whole town," she says. 1 pleaded, buses. fire trucks and even cemeteries. c,a. Itc 'Please,please give us more time."' Their schools played each other in ice pupas She was mid it was already too late. hockey. Everyone spoke Russian. More On the other side of the river, a work- than 1.000 Ivangorod residents, including man clambered down a rusty ladder into Ms.Kostituna,worked in Narva. uryIA an underground cavern in me Estonian The two towm5 still speak Russian—most town of Narva. There.with a quick heave residents in both are ethnic Russians—but on a big metal wheel, he put an end to now belong m different countries, and dif- - 'sweo_'• months of baggling—and to Ivangorod's ferent worlds. Russia's economy shrank - r water supply. 3.3,in the first nine months of last year.Es- '•9xs'JAr Fin D,� Authorities on the Russian side retali- tonia's grew by 5.6<<. Russia courts Serbia I - a ated swiftly. Ivangorod's mayor told mu- and Iraq as friends. Estonia wants to join 1 R09SIA mcipal workers to open a sluice gate.send- NATO and the European Union. mg thousands of gallons of sewage cascad- When the Soviet Union perished.Narva's asnuAx+ mg through an underground pipe into the 80,090 people got the water and sew agrrreat- Narva River. From watchtowers on oppo, ment systems tThev also got the best fire 9aAmR site banks, Russian and Estonian border trucks, leaving their neighbors unable to UND me PO guards now survey the slimy slick through I reach names higher than the fourth noor.l V D[kxwry laruiNE binoculars, a fast current sweeping the Ivangorod got three big crumbling factories. muck off toward the Baltic Sea after it but, only one of which,a former graphic-machur byes to the surface.Gulls peck at sewage- ery plant,snit produces.It now makes unr hallway.Again Ivangorod Scraped together stained ice frozen along the edges. brenas and cheap knickknacks. some money—or said it did:The funds van- Ms. Kostitsina went on local television The withering of Ivangorod's economy abed in the rubble of Russia's banking sys- to explain why trips had gone dry and toap- rant all bad:At least its sewage is less haz- tem after the country's August financial peal for calm.Hung over and dry-mouthed ardour.-We are only dumping fecal mater blowout.The ruble's demise added further alter days of holiday revelry, many of ial.not industrial waste."says the mayor. woe.Estonia demands payment in its own lvangurod'a 12.000 residents were gasping Anatoly Polapov. "Basically our factories more-solid currency,the kroon.Mr.Era or. for water."It was not pretty."she says. don't work anymore.' Environmentalists dered his workmen to cut water by io"c- For centuries, Ivangorod and Name warn that the damage could still be serious. ,lowered at each other across the river, How bad won't be known until ice now Please Dim to Pnge AIY,Column I each bank dominated by an imposing stone shielding the river banks melts—and swim- 'ortress.In the past,Russia has worn down men return to beaches downstream. each of its rivals,from the Danes who built Mr.Potapov says he can't afford Narva's i castle in Narva in the 13th century to the rates for sewage treatment and has `no Nazis who staged a ferocious last stand other exit'but to pour waste into the river. here in 1945. He hopes the mess will awaken Moscow to his town's economic plight and boost miserly federal funding.More than 400.000 gallons of slop from sills and toilets now drain each day into the waterway.Mr.Potapov says it is not that much really." but he worries Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # I Date I Subject Estonian and Russian Towns Fight Dirty Continued Flmm First Page Just after Christmas,Ivangorod got a fi- spent three days in jail after threatening to nal ultimatum:Pay up or slake its thirst by block a railway line in protest. "I'd say itself(Estonians who don't pay get cut off, about half the people here would like to join too).Ivangorod decided to go it alone,mobi- with Estonia now,"Mr.Gordeyev says."in Nixing money and municipal workers for a a year,it will be over 90%." frantic welf-digging drive amid birch and Russian nationalists are appalled. pine trees outside town.Officials spent New Vastly Vdiwin.an Ivangorod businessman Year's Day shivering in the snow,supervis. and head of the local branch of Mr.Zhiri. ing the jury-rigged emergency water sys- novsky's Liberal Democratic Party, says tem. (The town started the system years Russia has more potent weapons than . ago but gave up when promised funding sewage. "They spoiled our holiday. We from Moscow dried up.)meal civ"efense can do the same tothem,"he says.He sug. units went on alert. FSremen practiced gests that Ivangorod drain a reservoir drills fetching water from the river. The St2tldling the border, a move that would pumps now splutter and groan and provide I ermltc mppbes for three or four days a sabotage a big Estonian power plant. week. But even Mr. Vdovin admits that life Nonetheless, Mr. Potapov, the mayor, across the bridge is better.A milk chum, still prefers to sleep in a hotel equipped with plastic canisters and buckets filled with its own pump. His family stays in St. Pe- water clutter his apartment.He fills them tersburg.His deputy,Ms.Kostitsina.scur- atnlght froma lapoutside.Hesayshegoes ries about with buckets, stockpiling water out in the dark to avoid being seen by an- to cover days when taps yield only air.The water war has domed the embers of wiry neighbors: as a member of the local a more serious conflict. When the Soviet council.he worries they might blame him Union fell apart, many of Narva's mostly for across the thirstiness. Looking from wistfully Russian population felt marmned.Loyal to across the river toward Narva from his Moscow,not the Estonian capitalotTWlmn, ninth-floor apartment, he says: "Over they lobbied for autonomy.Vladimir Zion- there is Europe.Here we are in—to tell the novsky. Russia's eccentric nationalist truth.I'm not sure where Russia 6: politician.demanded that Narva be handed over to Russia and, to enforce the claim, proposed setting up big fans to blow ra- dioactive waste across the Baltics. Today.Narva's Russians complain about having to team Estonian before they can be- cane full citizens.Bat they count their hless- in gs—salaries and pensions paid on time and well-tended streets.Many still shop in Ivan- gorod. where bread and sausage are cheaper,but curse Russia for reneging on its debts and fouling the river.An informal stir Vey by Narva's main newspaper fond over whelming sympathy for Mr. Rri's hardball tactics. "The tea is definitely sweeter on this side of the river.we all admit that,"says Vladimir Chuikin, a former head of the Narva city council and leader of a now- abandoned campaign to integrate more closely with Russia. Meanwhile.many in Ivangorod lament being stuck in Russia.Yuri Gordeyev,a re- tired Russian sailor, has even launched a quixotic campaign to secede and merge with Estonia. He collected 502 signatures on a petition calling for a referendum and I VVN1Nl\ Y(fLYY♦ ewS G 1 n ex GO Y ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP` + : :n - :'1 Cam An¢eiro dimes "{ Tormented > Calendar ` souls and... �l; �.I - Monday,Tuary 25,1999 FOUNTAIN VALLEY By LM CH1U, (714)965-7172 he Orange County Water District recently received an RELATED 13 AA rating from Standard and Poor's, an international O.C.SECTIONS bond-rating organization and business information service. The designation makes the district one of the three MAIN PAGE water organizations in the state to hold such a rating. The district first earned the AA rating in 1994 because of its NNEWS BY competitive water rates and ability to easily get loans when COMMUNITY needed,as well as its strong service to the area economy. SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved PREPSPORTS BUSINESS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT,BONDS STANDARD& SO CAL LIVING POOR'S CORP CREDIT RATINGS.You will not be charg�k for stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMEM News Prestigious V SA http://www.latimes.comfHOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000007559.1.html 1/25/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register Oil companies sued over water pollution An environmental organiza- tion sued ra ail companies for billions of dollars Tuesday,ac- cusing them of polluting sources of California's drinking water with toxic leaks from refineries, pipelines and storage tanks. —Communities for a Better En- vironment also contends that state water boards stood idly by as ground water was contami- noted by benzene and toluene from 3,500 sites, some in every county of the state. The Superi- or Court suit targets only the oil companies and does not name state officials or the gas sta- tions where most of the storage tanks are located. Tuesday's suit accuses the companies of violating Proposi- tion 65, California's 114M initia- tive that prohibited discharging substances that cause cancer or birth defects into drinking wa- ter. Benzene and toluene are both known to cause cancer. A sepa- rate CBE suit, filed in Superior Court last year,accuses eight oil companies of contaminating ground water with the gasoline additive MTBE, a possible car- cinogen. ews � �o Ie n ex co t ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP J ues ay, January COSTA MESA By FUSE GEE, (949)574.4275 he City Council recently discussed the possibility of RELATED giving waste haulers in danger of losing their operating permits more time to fix violations. .C.-SECTIONS The proposal comes in anticipation of a state deadline that NEWS BY requires cities to recycle 50%of their waste before December COMMUNITY 2000 or face potential fines of as much as $10,000 a day,city officials said. Costa Mesa places several conditions on waste SPORTS haulers, including a requirement that each divert 50%of its PREP SPORTS waste by 2000 or face possible permit revocation. The amendment would give haulers more time to comply BUSINESS and thus avoid possible shutdowns of service.None of the waste haulers present at the council meeting directly opposed LIFE&STYLE the change, which would give a hauler 100 days to comply CALENDAR rather than 10. Some,however,raised concerns about meeting the 50%diversion rate. CALENDAR WEEKEND Coovriaht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved HOME DESIGN b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: COMMENTARY COSTA MESA(CA)---•CONTRACTS,RUBBISH COLLECTION PERMITS, RECYCLING.You will not be charged to look for stories,only T.V.TIMES to retrieve one. ADVERTISEMENT • 2 for t miles for qualifying Balance Transfer. NextCard Y/�S4 http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NE WS/ORANGE/OCNEW S/t000005653.1.html 1/19/99 Petitioners target retention of ci ' treatment D4 Friday,Jam 1, 1999 • said. create lower overall cons." Gross womed Sewer City nosh service and Imdscaph p "There is a reasonable rhma privatization thatthe yt� could slow thingsfor emmple, ate already prisms a Good ..d from Bl have cut costs significantly,accordi would bum The and privatization effort, to Aleshi[e P _ tilled Save Om Sewn,u led by hemenly denied that The dry=may said oppoamrs up sewer rates activist Jim Jong and support- ,ape would have to be nun to privatization have a double sus m mdude formerMayor Frank increase roan for citizens." dard. Bogor.Theywant a ballot mea- City Manager Rob Parkins wn- "People talk about govemmem b BY MICBEI.E CLACK sure that would prohibit the dry cumed,saying rate control will be m ing inefficient,buthae,the atgume AND JENNIFER LEmum from selling or leasing the my future contract is tamed on its head," he said txs smear svu sewage plant to my private firm, PALM SPRINGS — A Soup of add a rate assessment to utility �i��ofwn charge, the private t- criticism of privatization. "ALL inc Palm Springs residents fearful of men based on actual cost of public sector n m the cit "rote set- cation art that the tit an tmdn a higher sewage rota is stepping sewage treatment and stop the still will be done by the city,"he said, with cry management on this andt P hoping to quell one obvious fear that privatization,the citizens actually a up efforts to collect signatures ace of sewage plant doHms for has motivated the petition. protected." on a petition to prevent trans- other purposes. Parkin went even further, saying And, he said, the bidding pence fetring operation of the tity's Jones said the group bas and the shift m move much of the rity's has actually opined the doorto a for wastewater treatment plant to a the and of Jmmxy to collect business m the private sector is a needed review of the drys eaimr private company. 3,500 signatures. move toward"innovation,and borer rate structure. But for the group to succeed in Supporters with petition are managemm4 which in ram would "It makes me nervous that a seeing that the facility's fire be posted outside area grocery decidedbyvoten,ithacroover- stores and post offices. Their come a derision already made biggest hurdle, though, is get- haven't looked at it in so long," t by the Gry Council. ting the publiNs understanding said. "Thar is part of what we a That appears unlikely as my of the issue,Jones said. trying m dean up in this process.U officials say they are planning to SOS volunteer A4 A. Toma- ate nymg to pm together a peckzf decide by the and ofnex[month sevic, who was collecting sig- that wben all is said and done is legs berweentwofirms—Colorado- manes outside a Palm Springs no jump in rates._" based OMI and U.S. Filter of shopping center recently, The Desert Water. Agency, wh Palm Desert—bidding to take summed up the groups point of Aleshire said was cm out of th over operation of the plant view simply. bidding process early became of it "Certainly,the track the city is "Iris petition is a valuable bid was,too low,will continue to ge on,the city mtmds to move on tool that could give taxpayers an allotted share of reclaimed wow this process and I think it will and residents of Palm Springs he said. come to fruition very quickly," lower sewer mtes and mote But he noted that the bidding an. Gry Anomey David Aleshbe money in their pockets." comma process can drag on and it i said Thursday. Palm Springs resident Karen feasible that petitioners could haw: But he acknowledged that the Tabbah said she is against pri- shot at putting their measure on . petitioners' could influence the vatization because she has a ballot before thm process. problem with the idea of for- But once a connect for privet, "Certainly doing the petitim profit ownership. - operation is signed,Aleshhe said,th, can create a political event that sTF profit must mean the deal cannot be broken until the wn makes the council aware of the prices will go up 'in order m tract cspims. controversy over the issue. We make a profit,"she said.- have had people come down to Mayor WillKleindierut ve- the meetings and express con- i Please see SEWER,B4 ews - �x = ce 71 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES HELP rw Moms Sbcee Tormented Calendar souls and... a iP . Monday, eF—bruary fl9TS4 FOUNTAIN VALLEY By LISA CHIU, (714)965.7172 he Orange County Water District has announced plans to RELATED pay $1.5 million for 10,000 acre-feet of high-quality O.C.SE TIC 101 S— �'OU°d water from San Bernardino County. The water, enough to satisfy 20,000 average-sized families for a year, will NEWS BY be transported from San Bernardino County to the Orange COMMUNITY County ground-water basin for a year,and may be renewed in the future,district officials said. SPORTS PREP SPORTS (Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved BUSINESS b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: LIFE&STYLE WATER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT i$aWn NextCard Ve/SQ Online Balance Transfers. 2.9% intro APR. http://www.l at imes.com/HOMEINE W S/ORANGE/OCNE W S/t000009847.1.html 2/1/99 ews s r ORANGE COUNTY C NMUNITIES HELP WThe University r . BA A Alliance, MI. • CIS Friday, Janes GARDEN GROVE ByJASON KANDEL, (714)564-1038 he Sanitary District recently fixed an 8-inch crack in a RELATED 13 sewer main near the Belgrave Channel at Springdale Street. The main spilled about 9,000 gallons of sewage O.C.SECTIONS into the Belgrave Channel and was the third break in a pipe in NEWS BY the last year. A resident had reported smelling sewage near the CONRvRJNITY Belgrave Channel at Springdale Street on Jan. 10. SPORTS CODVItC}Il 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved PREP SPORTS BUSINESS Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: SEWAGE SPILLS—ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINES.You will not be LIFE&STYLE charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERnSEMEt4r r_Sevlhgs==;' NextCard Y/�A Online Balance Transfers. 2.9% intro APR. http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINE WS/ORANGE/0CNEWS/t000008808.1.html 1129/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section I Page # I Date Subject Los Angeles Times 6 LOS ALAMITOS The Ressmoor-Las Alamitos Area Sewer District will remain intact,at least for the foreseeable future. A majority of the City Council voted this week to table a proposal made by Councilman Charles R Sylvia to consider breaking up the district that serves the city. Rossmoor and parts of Cypress and Seal Beach. Sylvia argued that the district is inefficiently run and does not have adequate financial reserves. By acting now, he said. the city could also take over the district's sitenm#to City Ball. -_ But Mayor Marilynn M.Poe was joined by three colleagues when she said the city has too much going on to propose the contro- versial action. She cited lawsuits filed against Seal Beach, for ap- proving the massive Bgby devel- opment, and the Los Alamitos Unified School District, for mov- ing ahead with plans to build a . new high school.CouncUman Ar- thur DeBolt, who served an the district board, said Sylvia's cam- plaints are withoutmeriL -La,Wn M,(714)M-1634 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Foote.-d mh. concerts ■The city relies on storm drains and pump sEat1 ns ?; to keep dry during the rainy season, but public works officials say the system needs upgrades. i a` .r;. w..'•.-.:.:s.s'�: .mIrORS NOTE Thh is part of an j t. i' . o ional series of reports on the$13 billion infrastructure problem facing Huntington Beads. KArwma HAr. That facility then monitors the -_ time—they're dying of old age,.r level of water it receives.Once it said Howard Johnson, the dtys:; reaches 10 feet, a sensor signals water production supervisor. the pump engines to begin chii _ Renna agreed. nelmg the water into the nearest "The rate of deterioration from flood control channel. Mother Nature alone is faster Johnson said when there is a than we can keep up with," he problem, the pump station seods said. an automatic signal to the city's scan GGZ-nuus fNotromtm . Yet the storm pump equip- water division office, where A fisherman walks past a i ment has motioned in hold up someone is always on call to han- storm drain at the end of even during the most severe rile any problems. Goldenwesl Street. nOrm. Remo said city streets some- -- "We haven't had a failure yet times flood during heavy rains HUNTINGTON REACH — that we weren't able to repair," because the pump stations ren ' One day soon city officials may Johnson said. only process so much water at a be forced to spend roughly S75 He recalled one instance time, million simply to keep the city when one of the pump station -If the station's filled, the above water. engines had blown out during a water bas got to pond in the if just one of the city's 15 water particularly harsh El Nino storm steel," he said. pumping stations faits during a in December 1997.Fortunately,it which a why Retina said in heavy rainstorm, it will cost S5 had stopped raining by the time addition to replacing equipment. million to replace, said Jeff crews were alerted to the prob- city officials need to consider Rena, city water operations lem,he said. building larger pump stations. manager. "We worked all night on -But sooner or later we're He said nearly all of the 40- rebuilding the engine and had it going to have to do something.' year-old storm pump stations, ready by the next day,' he said. be said. 'It's really, 'Pay me now which help pump rainwater into The pump stations, which are or pay me later." nearby flood control channels. located in various residential need to be upgraded. tracts throughout the city, are 'The city should start replac- able to pump roughly 60,000 gat- ing them if they want that re6a- Ions of water per minute.Johnson biitty,' Rena said. 'Or else pen. ' said each station is fully automat- pie will get wet more and more sc. often.' He said when it begins to rain, Keeping storm water from water flows from a storm drain flooding streets and property into a catch basin under the street throughout the city is another curb. Pipes funnel the water into major concern on the city's gmw- the nearest storm drain pump sta- iog list of infrastructure needs. lion. Although the city's storm pumps have been well-main- public works officials agree that time is taking its toll "The storm pipes are rotting - .. , .. all .1� lNews . cc e n ex - F,3c ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES .HELP Thursday. January 28, GARDEN GROVE By JASON KANDEL, (7I4)564-1038 n an effort to publicize safe environmental practices, the RELATED .Orange County Sanitation District is releasing a new informational video, "Protecting the Environment," that O.C. SECTIONS describes how waste water is treated. The video offers many NEWS BY answers regarding the processes for Garden Grove residents. COMMUNITY The district also has a Speaker's Bureau with representatives who will meet with city,residential or business groups. SPORTS Information: (714) 741-5101. PREP SPORTS Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved BUSINESS LIFE&STYLE Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT News NextCard ISASASASA Online Balance Transfers. 2.9% intro APR. http://www.latimes.con✓I TOME/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000008538.1.htrnl 1/28/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register .� � 3 /�ys UV-1-1 7 `:FOUNTAIN VALLEY ' iirhe Orange Coumy Water M %4ct approved a'water-trans far egreemeat that will pto- _ vide 100,000 Orange County,_ residents with. m Sa Year's SUP,` frp ply of water an Bar nardino Valley Municipal Water District and the West - am Municipal Water,Dis,;- trim",This transfer has been number of.yes rs.m the nakng,",enid Iry i . 1 .'Pickler,president of the Fountan Valley-based dis-'.... trict.^.It is fortunate that the high ground-water sima-�. tion in Sao Bernardino could; be transformed into this transfer agreement."U San Bernardino County ground 'p water remains high in Years '- to wine,the agreement may; be renewed. `• '-.,' s I . —Olana lenaw(rte)44S4W ' Legislation Seeks To Stem Expensive Y2K Lawsuits Page 1 of 2 $otao �*rre2 1 � Site Map Search COMPUTERWORLD Contact Us Subscribe ® � 'fSYYL'LSi1Li'i{{8{IL7 News •Late Legislation Seeks To Stem bestnes •News bye(audio7 o) •lW Minute(audio) Expensive Y2K Lawsuits •Continued from print Features McCain's bill would limit punitive damages •Managing •Year2DDD By Matt Hamblen •Review Center 01,25/e9 With 34 lawsuits over year 2000 problems already •In Depth in the courts, House and Senate Republicans hope to Viewpoint stem a costly legal stampede with legislation, including a •Paul Gitlin bill filed last week. •More columnists Latest Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) introduced the Y2K Act, publications which has been referred to his Senate Commerce •Most recent Committee. A similar House bill was filed Jan. 6. Both publications measures limit court awards so that punitive damages would be no larger than three times the amount of actual economic losses. The bills also would create courtroom alternatives such as arbitration to avoid time-consuming court proceedings. "The purpose of this legislation is to ensure that we look to solving ... Y2K rather than clog our courts with years of costly litigation," McCain said. There are already at least 34 year 2000 lawsuits pending in state and federal courts, including the latest, brought Jan. 13 by a large New York law firm against AT&T Corp. and Lucent Technologies Inc., according to analysts and court records. The Clinton administration is unsure legislation is necessary. "There is no consensus position on liability legislation among the industry groups working on the matter," said John Koskinen, chairman of the President's Year 2000 Conversion Council. However, David LeDuc, manager of legislative polity at the Software and Information Industry Association in Washington, said his group is working with an informal Y2K coalition of http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nspCNNT]ash/990125RC8E 1/28/99 Legislation Seeks To Stem Expensive Y2K Lawsuits Page 2 of 2 industries that believes otherwise. "There's a consensus and a need for a large bill . . . to address the large number of cases coming," he said. ----------------------------------------------------------- NEWS x FEATURES I RESOURCE CENTER I IT .ARF RS I COMPUTERWORLO INC Ca1act Us l Searcn I Site Man I SupSLbt: COMPUTERWORLO Copyright 01999 ComputemorlE,Inc.All rights resonea.Local notices and trademark attributions Back to top httt,:Hwwu,.comnuterm,orld.comthome/print.nsf/CWR;I9h/99012SRCSE 1/2R/99 ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL February 8, 1999 FHere Comes a No-Growth Uprising ■ By PETER BRENNAN ning controversies over housing at Bolsa Chica,a resort at Dana Point Headlands and the James A. Musick Jail in Throughoutthecounty,no-growthand slow-growth move- Irvine.But there arc many other protests that have surfaced menu are springing up,at a level that hasn't been seen since in recent months. the late 1980s. Property owners at Monarch Beach signed a form ac- The latest and most publicized — knowledging their ocean views and also the one with the biggest po- might someday be impaired, but tential impact— is a proposed iniva- they've complained nevertheless live from opponents of an airport at El about a nearby residential pmject Toro. Their Safe and Healthy Corn- being built by Capital Pacific Hold- munities Act would require a two, s ings. A group representing 600 thirds vote for approval of what they - 'p` S` - homeowners in Huntington Beach cal l"noxious projects;'including air- A residents argued that a proposed ports,landfills and prisons. a Wal-Mart would create too much But a commercial airport at El Tom traffic in the area;the City Council that is just one of several projects t are - narrowly approved the store,saying beingcomplained about. Proposed site of resort at Treasure Island In it would brio $SOO,000a year into P Laguna Beach:one of several battle grounds g y There are,of course, the long-run- y No-Growth page 18 pare is see user:ww.acll.cOm ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL Febwmr K.IW1 No-Growth grow on a fence so that it doesn't black the development? while growth was cited by 5%,making it only 1 V•.` public's view of the lake from a nearby road.A Is there a feeling that maybe The county is the sixth biggest problem facing the county. /ram Jorge 1 group of Laguna Niguel residents opposed a built out and no more growth should be al- One of the biggest battles over growth in the 50-font non-working bell lower at St. Anne lowed. Apoll Iasi Septemberby Universilyof I980s occurred in Irvine, but it doesn't look city coffers in revenue. School as unsightly.Andsomelhingthal would California Irvine researchers Mark Baldassare like it'll be a repeal Ibis time around. Laguna Beach activists signed up enough seem loappcal to no-growth proponents,beach and Cheryl Katz revealed that 66% of the Irvine Struggle Over voters to force an initiative on whether a$75 bicycle paths, were rejected by the San respondents would vole to approve lawslimil- million hotel/residential project at Treasure Clemente City Council as too disruptive In the ing development in their communities. Larry Agran, a current Irvine city council Island should be built. San Juan Capistrano, coastline. member and former mayor whn led the fight where some residents fear Ion much develop- for what he calls "controlled growth;' said mend would harm its Spanish flavor and could Pattern to Protests 'The greal struggle Irvine has already fought its battle with the even disorient the famous swallows, has a Each case is different, and the reasons for Irvine Co. and both sides reached a comprn- moratorium on building large-scale projects opposing projects vary, but developers sug. Ives Ron in the hue mise of preserving open space but allowing within the city until next May. gest there is a general pattern to anti-develop- 1980s.' some development. lie said some Irvine new A group of Sierra Club activists are prepar- mend Protests—they tend to increase when the Irvine th comers are worried about grow , and they ing plans to fight the Foothill South loll road; economy is booming,as it is now. — question whether The city should go slower on In bone up on how to do it, they recently "When limes are lough,you don't see people Councilman permidling new developments. listened to a speech from a Bundinglon Beach griping about stuff,"said Mike Larson,presi- tarry g A mn "We pointou uopcoplelbaldhegrcalsdrugglc activist who's been fighting development at dent of PLC Commercial. "When everyone was won in the lade 19811s. We preserved Bales Chica.ResidenlsofTurtle Rockinlrvine gets far, dumb and happy again, there's a 16,600 acres of open space in Irvine,and we are talking privately to their city council mem- segment that says we're growing too much" For the most part,developers answered no to have the most remarkable open space of any her;about a development being planned by the Ludlon added. "Traditionally. smart dcvel- city west of the Mississippi; said Agran. all these are runs. Irvine Company. opers gel entitled during recessions because Although Orange County is the largest in "People are boyhood to specific instances re In Yorba Linda, a no-growth movement you don't have the no-growth factions" Southern California in terms of population specific neighborhoods.prhaerds.They lend lobe more fielded alasingslale ofcouncil candidates last The tale l9Rlhwasaboom period that brought vocal on those Projecls;'said tarry Thomas, density per square mile,developers said they November. on tremendous traffic jams. A slow-growth senior VP ofcorporate communications at The don't believe its residents have a sense that it's The Anaheim City Council seriously exam- movement appeared in the form of a county- Irvine Company."I see no evidence from sur- all built out and nothing more can be built. incd a proposal to limit gas stations for fear wide ballol measure,but it was defemed.Then veys that a huge no-growth movement is going Christine Dicmer,CEO of the Building In there might be one on every corner. the Tecessionoccurred and the no-growth move- on." duslry Association of Orange County.pointed A plan to convert drug-recovery center into mend faded away. Lie pointed out that in the same UCi survey, out that similar movements have appeared in a full-fledge hospital a Is the Belly Ford Cenler The complaints bring up larger questions:Is Orange County residents believed growth San Diego and Ventura counties in the past was rejected by Laguna Beach City Council the movement different this lime around? would be good for them and 75%believe the year and that Vice President At Gore is prey after 200 residents complained about it. Could Orange County be lurningaway from its county will either be a better place to live or moling"smart growth" where there is more Little things are under fire, too: Mission conservative,pro-business roots?Could it be slay the same.And in that survey,when resi- open land. Viejo is arguing with the Lake Mission Viejo going the way of Ventura County,where re- dents were asked what was the number one "This tension and feeling is not just isolaled Association over how tall the oleander can I ant initiatives have practically shut down problem, crime was ranked highest at 30% 1 to Orange County,"she said.■ lnulc cVwny WULKC1b act bix-11gurc J WA.. ...g.. . ... . government sEOClmuerrsa9e ,, m uxt,a�maa. . m iL C= F MEeaAMGgO]IMIT PttJSIG ocregister com More county workers get six- figure salaries LABOR: The number of government employees paid $100,000 or more is up 24% in about a year. February 7, 1999 Elat6rs. By DAVID PARRISH The Orange County Register The ranks of county government executives,managers and professionals pulling down a base salary of$100,000 or more has jumped 24 percent,to 231, in little more than a year. An additional 61 employees,mostly attorneys in the District Attorney's Office,are now being paid just$54 short of the county's six-figure club. And the number of employees receiving base pay of$90,000 or more has leaped 41 percent during the same period,since October 1997. The average county employee is paid $42,954. The salaries of the highest paid county government employees were obtained in January by the Register through the Public Records Act and compared with a similar list from October 1997. The comparison showed that several employees had their salaries increased by more than the standard county rise of 3 percent to 4 percent in the past 14 months,in some cases boosting them above six figures. County officials said there was a variety of reasons for the sudden growth in highly paid positions,such as promotions, salary adjustments, keeping pace with a hot job market and recent across-the-board raises—the first granted since the county's December 1994 bankruptcy. Jan Mittermeier,the county executive officer and the highest paid employee,at$149,801,said her executives and managers played a major role in getting things back on a fiscally responsible track after the county's$1.6 billion financial meltdown. http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay00gw.shtml 2/9/99 ...wo .way wur&w.gm six-ngure satartes Page 2 of 5 "If you want to attract and maintain these people,you have to be competitive in the marketplace," Mittermeier said. "You have to pay for talent. Why do we care if our salaries are competitive?Because that's going to give up the best product—the people who create and develop ideas and lead the organization." Others outside county government had a mixed view of the recent jump in high-end salaries. Bruce Whitaker,a spokesman for the Committees of Correspondence,a government watchdog group,saw the numbers as evidence of a relaxation of fiscal restraint as the county moves further away from the public scrutiny that followed the bankruptcy. "While the times are good this doesn't come home to roost, but in the next down cycle I suspect the county will have budget problems,"Whitaker said. The sharp rise in high-end salaries also is indicative of an attitude among county government executives that they should be paid on par with those working in private business,he said. "The old deal,when you work in government,is you have a great deal of security and great benefits, but not top pay," Whitaker said. The equal-pay concept also rankles Fred Whittlesey,the principal at Compensation and Performance Management of Newport Beach, which designs and evaluates employee compensation plans for businesses. A six-figure salary for county executives and managers might well be justified,he said but the demands on them can't be compared to what private-industry executives face. Turnover for business executives runs at about 40 percent, with a quick exit waiting for those who can't find markets and produce a profit. "There are not people putting in 80 to 100 hours per week," Whittlesey said of county government. "When you choose a county job,you are choosing less hours and less risk." Such comments irritate Mittermeier. "The public has this perception that government employees are 8-to-5, and that they don't work as hard as the private sector, so they shouldn't be paid as much," Mittermeier said. - "It doesn't work like that anymore. Government executives work just as hard and (are)as creative." http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay008w.shtml 2/9/99 n�um cuwuy wwnct>gc�>�n-ugwc >wwic> a agc � w .. Mittermeier, through a spokeswoman, said she is generally in her office by 7 a.m.,doesn't leave until after 7 p.m. and then has many evening speaking engagements and meetings, as well. "We're guessing around 70 hours (a week)but it's sometimes more than that," said spokeswoman Diane Thomas. As for other executives in her office, Mittermeier doesn't keep track of their hours but "knows people are here late at night and early in the morning,"Thomas said. "(They)put in whatever time it takes to get the job done better than anyone else could do it." Jan Walden, county director of human resources, said that for the most part the county is competing for employees with other government agencies, but salaries still must be in the ballpark of what is paid in private industry. Recently, the county learned how expensive it can be to hire from the private sector. Tom Uram,the Health Care Agency director, retired last year, and his acting replacement,Ron DiLuigi, later resigned to take a job at St. Joseph Hospital. Uram was paid $118,185. Last month,Mittermeier had to boost the pay for that position to$145,808 to lure Donald Oxley, 54, away from a private HMO hospital network. Oxley is now the second- highest-paid county employee. Even at that, Oxley said, he took a pay cut to come to Orange County. "It was significant," Oxley said without revealing the amount. "You don't make as much money in terms of direct compensation, but there are benefits. The retirement system is of interest to me at this stage in my life." Now Mittetmeier has one department head, Oxley,who is paid$15,000 to$20,000 more than her other key executives. "We will have to look at some sort of salary adjustments," she said, adding that probably would not happen this year. That is not just out of fairness, Mittermeier said, but to prevent other government agencies from raiding her department heads. Whitaker said that's just the type of thinking that produces big salaries in county government. http://www.ocregister.com/politicstpay008w.shtml 2/9/99 .rw.c wwuy wutxua ge.aix-Lgare]alarle� rage 4 OI D "It's very hard for the top dogs to have a hard line against budget-busting raises for those below," Whitaker said. County figures show the number of six-figure employees has grown from 187 in October 1997 to 231 last month. During the same period,the number earning $90,000 or more rose to 423 from 293. One of the biggest boosts to the county's six-figure club was the addition of 14 captains in the Sheriffs Department and Marshal's Office—all of whom received a raise of more than 15 percent last year, moving to $100,755 from a base pay of$87,526. Captains were underpaid compared with counterparts in other area policing agencies,said Walden,the human resources director. Similarly,a major addition to the ranks of those making more than$90,000 came from 54 sheriffs and marshal's lieutenants receiving a raise of more than 15 percent last year,boosting pay to$90,771 from$78,499. "With just minimal overtime it was possible for sergeants to make more than lieutenants," said Assistant Sheriff Doug Storm. Other significant raises—"equity adjustments"—went to executives considered to be underpaid. Several went to women—including Walden—who had risen rapidly through the ranks under Mittermeier's administration but had seen their paychecks lagging behind those of their male counterparts. Walden received a 9.2 percent raise,moving to$97,177 from$88,337. Courtney Wiercioch,manager of the EI Toro airport project, received a 10 percent raise last year,to $94,036 from $95,488. Despite those raises,there were only two women among the 25 top-paid county executives. A few more women,however,have entered the county's six- figure club from 14 months ago. In October 1997,there were 33 women making $100,000 or more; now there are 54. Salary adjustments also have gone to men,most notably John Adams,the county librarian. His pay went up 17 percent,to$103,313. County officials explained that this was necessary because a survey showed he was significantly http://www.ocregister.conL/politics/pay008w.shtml 2/9/99 MOM cowry wurwers 8CL six-ngure saranes rage 3 or D underpaid compared with head librarians in other counties and cities. On average,Mittermeier gave her executives and managers about a 4 percent raise last summer. Then in December,the county's top 60 executives received an additional 3 percent raise in the form of a tax-free contribution to their deferred- compensation retirement accounts. Along with elected county officials, Mittermeier—who is appointed by the Board of Supervisors—received a 6 percent contribution in December to her deferred- compensation account,to go with the 7 percent raise supervisors gave her in July. Mittermeier said giving raises is a balancing act. "They thought I was too tight-fisted when I gave out 4 percent to the county executives," Mittermeier said. "I want to retain the best people,but we have to make sure we are fiscally responsible also." fl nempa"rm omnie couniY,cammia .re ow Coppi9h110.1 O 1996-1999 TM Onrpa Coumy Rnislar Pbese aerq mmmems to ooeaktet®4nk.imeEom.mm http://www.ocregister.com/politics/pay008w.shtml 219/99 som"s MMIMTRAQ . technolo y ome age .ram .m. u o ccess m R1NELaaNGF[LUNY aFCJFiFR 7 ocree inter com Bay water discharge plan is back ENVIRONMENT: District will again try to put reclaimed water into Upper Newport body, but in with ecological incentives. Edpeof Natun__;.;;y.. February 5, 1999 Om Universe„i:.i ..y By PAT BRENNAN The Orange County Register The last time Irvine Ranch Water District tried to discharge treated waste water into Upper Newport Bay, it touched off a storm of _ environmental protest. .u," A year of litigation followed. And i image or y g i image or vi eo when ajudge in October nullified the footage. (4421Q district's permit to discharge the water, it appeared the project was rhea video requires the headed for the scrap heap. o° `oam wea n n re-' y�Video But the district wants to resurrect its yQ�covmy NarsChanneF for more pictures on plan—this time with modifications this ara moor Orerge County news, meant to improve the Back Bay's mac*OCN 24 hours aday. habitat,save the city hundreds of You oars e,mea OCN ah thousands of dollars a year in oaOMSLeedem. dredging costs,and, district engineers ope,win me approval of environmental activists. 'T n not convinced we'll be able to make everybody happy," said Ken Thompson,the district's director of water quality. "But I think we've put together a project with a lot of benefits for the environment,and we're looking for support for it." The activists who successfully sued over the previous plan expressed skepticism Thursday. They said they'll would wait to pass judgment until they can analyze the plan,to be released at a water district board meeting Monday. "The devil is in the details," said Mark Wolfe,an attorney with the Natural Heritage Institute in San Francisco who crafted the earlier lawsuit. "It looks like they're doing an end-run around(the judge's)decision." http://www.ocregister.com/sciencetwater005w.shtmi 2/9/99 Bob Caustin, a Newport Beach clean-water activist, had similar worries. "They're just dressing up the Trojan horse in a different color," he said. But both he and Wolfe said they would not rule out supporting the plan if it turns out to be a genuine benefit to the bay. "If they can take care of the problems (in the plan)why don't they just say so?" Caustin said. "We'd love to go and do something else." Thompson said the district could save hundreds of thousands of dollars by diverting some of the water from a treatment plant into the bay during heavy rains. The original plan, which received approval from the Regional Water Quality Control Board in 1996, would have discharged reclaimed water—derived from waste water, but refined until it looks clear—directly into San Diego Creek, which flows into Upper Newport Bay. That drew the protests from activists. The reclaimed water still contains higher levels of nitrogen than normal water. And nitrogen is one of the Back Bay's biggest problems: It brings blooms of algae that choke the bay's underwater habitat. Although the regional water board found the nitrogen levels acceptable, Orange County Superior Court Judge Robert Thomas didn't. The district's new version of the water plan looks,to a nontechnician, a bit like the wacky mechanical constructions of Rube Goldberg. But Thompson said the district's engineers spent years perfecting it. First, water from San Diego Creek would be diverted into the district's settling ponds. Early estimates place the cost of the diversion system at$250,000 or more. The silty water that would normally flow into the Back Bay, raising its sediment levels and forcing the county to regularly employ expensive dredging equipment, would instead flow through the chain of ponds on the district's property. The ponds are a gathering place for water birds and a popular recreation spot. The water from the district's waste-water-reclamation plant, meanwhile, would flow through a pipeline to the Sand http://www.ocregister.com/science/water005w.shtml 2/9/99 Canyon Reservoir, which is inland from the water district. The treated water would mingle with water held in the reservoir,diluting it, and would be released only when the reservoir overflows because of storms. Thompson said that means zero to 100 million gallons of water will be discharged into the Back Bay every year— primarily during the rainy season. The discharges would be intermittent and rare. That's compared to 900 million gallons under the old plan, with six months'worth of constant discharge. This year, Thompson said,rains are so moderate that the water discharge would have been zero so far. Once discharged, the water would be further diluted as it passed along the creek and into the bay.And the diversion of sediment-loaded water from the creek would so greatly reduce nitrogen and phosphorous that the bay would end up with a net reduction in nitrogen,despite the occasional discharge of reclaimed water. "I think it provides the Newport Bay something it has never had before," Thompson said. "And that's wintertime protection from (nitrogen). And, more importantly,it will enhance sediment removal." The plan requires approval from the regional water board. And the activists will be watching closely every step of the way,ready to challenge the plan if they find it wanting. !1 newspaper in oninire county.Mini— I Ne ;.. Copyright O 19 1999 The Orange Coumy Raglsler Plasm send comments to oaegulerdtil heeEom.com http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterOO5w.shtmi 219/99 ews _ � � I e n ex - co Y' • I. ORANGE COUNTY NEWS WELPI REBATES: . MIIIfN\f VlfnN\ 1 JED,._ISON ' r , Wednesday, a ruary 10, 1999 ANAHEIM Flooded Intersection Closes Businesses By DEBRA CANO. Special to The Times broken water main shot a fountain of water into the air RELATED 131 Tuesday afternoon, flooding an Anaheim intersection SECT]vS and forcing several businesses to close for the day. The break tore a 10- by 30-foot hole in the pavement and MAIN PAGE spilled thousands of gallons of water into the streets shortly before noon. No other damage was caused and no one was hurt. NEWSBY COMMUNITY Police barricaded Broadway and Euclid Street for several SPORTS blocks in each direction through the evening and traffic was diverted from the area. PREP SPORTS The break not only inconvenienced motorists and residents, but disrupted businesses. Gasoline station pump islands were BUSINESS empty, stores had no customers and about a dozen businesses SO CAL LIVING were without water. Some restaurants put up "closed" signs and businesses CALENDAR ranging from hair salons to automotive garages canceled appointments. CALENDAR 'Nobody can drive over here," said Jim Rayes, manager of a WEEKEND Union 76 gas station. "We don't have any business today." HOME DESIGN The loss of water was particularly effective at putting the Laundry Stop, a self-service laundry, out of business for the COMMENTARY day. "People had clothes in the wash cycle" when the water T.V.TIMES stopped, said owner Rich Murg. Anaheim water utility crews worked through the afternoon to repair the 10-inch pipe. Officials expected to restore service to the businesses on Euclid by last night, said Ray Merchant, Anaheim Public Utilities spokesman. No homes were affected, he said. ADVERTISEMENT City officials are investigating the cause of the break. The cast-iron water pipe was installed in 1959 and appeared to be in good shape, Merchant said. N•w S Authorities expect to reopen streets in the area in time for this morning's commute. I"eseiglous CopwiRhi 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: ANAHEIM(CA), FLOODING, PIPELINES, EOUIPMENT FAILURES. V SA You will not be charged-to for stories,only to retrieve one. http://www.latimes.com/HONIENEWSIOR-kNGE'tOOOOI 2591.Lhtml 2/10/99 "vs _ Gc ienex - G'3 • a ' - 0#,'1 f 11 ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP Wednesday, a ruary 10, 1999 DANA POINT By CHRIS CEBALLOS. (949)248.2I50 13,000-gallon sewage spill, caused by a pump station RELATED failure, has closed half a mile of Monarch Beach at Salt —Creek to surfing,swimming and diving. Beach-goers O.C.SECTIONS should avoid the water near storm drains and other coastal MAIN PAGE outlets because bacteria levels can rise during and after rainstorms. For updates on beach closures, call: (714) 667- NEWS BY 3752. COMMUNITY SPORTS Coovrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved PREP SPORTS b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: BUSMESS SEWAGE SPILLS--ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH. BEACHES--ORANGE COUNTY. You will not be charged to look for SO CAL LIVING stories,only to retrieve one. CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT News NextCard Online Balance Transfers. 2.9% intro APR. httr:ut i%iv.latimes.comfHO',iF'VFNI�'Srf1RAN''C,F'tnnnnl'_'597.1.html 2/10/99 ews Go IF n ex Go I g ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP TAT The w • MBA University . BA Alliance° • CIS ues ay, a ruary , 1 99 LA PALMA By HARRISONSHEPPARD, (714) 966-5977 reception will be held next week for outgoing RELATED Councilwoman Eva Miner Bradford, who is resigning to become a Morrison missionary in Arizona The O.C.SECTIONS community reception is scheduled for the City Hall foyer Feb. MAIN PAGE 16 at 6 p.m., before the regular council meeting. Bradford, a councilwoman for 10 years, and her husband, Stewart,will NEWS BY leave next month for the two-year mission in Tempe. COMMUNITY SPORTS Coovrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved PREPSPORTS b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stores.You will BUSINESS not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. SO CAL LIVING CALENDAR CALENDAR WEEKEND HOME DESIGN COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES ADVERTISEMENT n f-LA �n,i0 http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000012461.1.html 219/99 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject orange County Register DANA POINT Neighbors on all sides of a tw"ory home at 3S79S Beach Road in Capistrano Beach will right the last round today in preventing the demolition of the build- ing and construcion of a new single-family mean- front home. The building is owned by Beach Palisades Inc. and occupied by Jehu Hand.Neighbors say a new building,which will extend five feet farther toward the ocean,will obstruct their views.City staff recom- mends the City Council al- low the construction.The council meets at 6:30 p.m. r at 33M Colder Lantern Street,Suite 210. ... A pump- station failure in the Moulton Niguel Water District system mused 13,000 gallons of raw sewage to spill into Salt Creek Beach waters Monday morning.A quarter-mile stretch of beach in each di- rection will be closed for at least of three days while the aunty conducts tests. Dennis Kaiser (949)454-7329 e+lina TWabrt (949)454-r394 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper section Page # Date =t —, [Orange County Register + 2 I 1« I ✓ � LA HABRA i Motorists driving eastbound on Imperial Highway we'll notice congestion tightening up as the Orange County Sanita- tion District is expected to finish its work at Harbor Boulevard and Imperial Highway on Friday.Howev. er,widening of right-turn lanes at Imperial and Idaho Street has hit a snag with the removal of a traffic sig- nal,and work is not expKt. ed to be completed there un. til the end of March. Andrew Turtle (714)7"3730 orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register -41a State will again support farmers in water dispute The state of California on Monday resurrected its support of farmers and other water us. ers in an escalating and com- plex legal dispute with the U.S. government over the manage- ment of the nation's biggest wa- ter project. The friendrokhecourt motion filed in U.S. District Court by the Davis administration re- vives a challenge to the way the Department of Interior is meet- ing a provision to protect fish and wildlife under the 1992 Cen- tral Valley Project Improve- ment Act. The new Democratic regime, upon evaluating a similar brief it had recently withdrawn by outgoing Republican Gov. Pete Wilson,now agrees that Interi- or's water-allocation plan should be scrapped and revised. At issue is how 800,000 acre- feet of water allocated each year for fish and wildlife should be accounted for under an over- haul of the Central Valley Pro- ject. U Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING JANUARY 27, 1999 pJN ANITgl� Q x o � e1Cl'N� ENV`�p� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OC90• P.O.Box 8127•Fountain Valley,CA 927284127•(714)962-2411 Minutes for Board Meeting 9 01/27/99 Page 2 of 6 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on January 27, 1999, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS A Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X John Collins Laurann Cook X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo X John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Jack Mauller Patsy Marshall X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F.Walker A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy L Neugebauer James V. Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith A Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Oolen; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Ryal Wheeler, Chuck Winsor, Moira Sullivan OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Greg Woodside Minutes for Board Meeting 01/27/99 1 Page 3 of 6 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Buena Park Jack Mauller• Patsy Marshall Fountain Valley John J. Collins* Laurann Cook Fullerton Don Bankhead Jan Flory' Huntington Beach Peter Green* Dave Garofalo Irvine Christina Shea' Greg Smith La Palma Eva Miner Bradford Paul F. Walker Newport Beach Jan Debay Tom Thomson Orange Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill' Seal Beach Shawn Boyd Paul Snow Tustin Thomas R. Saltarelli• Jim Potts Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson' Gene Wisner Board of Supervisors Todd Spitzer Chuck Smith REPORT OF THE CHAIR Due to the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair reported that the OMTS Committee meeting had been cancelled for February. He then thanked staff for holding a workshop for Directors regarding the strategic plan on January 91", and a New Directors Orientation on January 150 . Vice Chair Swan also reported that Chair Debay had requested a workshop for the Directors be held in March regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System EIR. A tentative date has been set for Saturday, March 13", from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager requested Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, to give a brief presentation on why a special workshop was being held on the Groundwater Replenishment System EIR. Mr. Anderson also gave a brief presentation on the Kem County biosolids issue and the purchase option for Wheeler Ridge. Moira Sullivan, Chair of the Employee Activity Committee, was then recognized who presented Don McIntyre with an award in connection with employee purchased gifts for the Christmas charity program. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered the minutes of the regular meeting held December 16, 1998, approved, as corrected. v Minutes for Board Meeting 0 01/27/99 Page 4 of 6 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/98 12/31/98 Totals $4,470,465.13 $5,183,798.71 Director Mark Leyes abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds for three existing sewer easements located in the City of Fullerton in connection with Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-3, to Cal Pac Remediation Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Unocal, in a form approved by General Counsel. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the January 27, 1999 meeting. The Vice Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 16, 1998 to be filed. 12. A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re the January 6, 1999 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on January 6, 1999 to be filed. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid), on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Authorize award of a contract for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid), to Ark Construction Company for an amount not to exceed$618,000. 14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1998. Minutes for Board Meeting v 01/27/99 0 Page 5 of 6 15. Ordinance No. OCSD-08, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-08 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-08. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-08 as an urgency measure, to be effective immediately: AYES: Steve Anderson, Don Bankhead, Shawn Boyd, John Collins, Lynn Daucher, Brian Donahue, Norm Eckenrode, James M. Ferryman, Peter Green, John M. Gullixson, Mark Leyes, Shirley McCracken, Pat McGuigan, Joy L. Neugebauer, Russell Patterson, Anna L Piercy, Thomas R. Saltarelli, Christina Shea, Peer Swan, Charles E. Sylvia NOES: None ABSENT: Jan Debay, Eva Miner-Bradford, Mark Murphy, Todd Spitzer MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Early Retirement Incentive Agreement with Orange County Employees Retirement System in connection with Ordinance No. OCSD-08. 16. A presentation was given by Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, on major strategic plan issues associated with the groundwater replenishment system and ocean discharge. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (54956.9): The Board convened in closed session at 7:45 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:35 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. The General Counsel reported that the Board of Directors ordered that the Application for Permission to File Late Claim, Claim of Michael Rozengurt, be denied, and notification thereof be forwarded to counsel for Claimant. Minutes for Board Meeting a 01/27/99 Page 6 of 6 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Director Bankhead requested that consideration of changing the meeting time for board meetings from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. be placed on the February agenda. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Secretary of a Board of ire c ors of Orange Cou ty Sanitati District Hixp.dtaragendalBoard Minu WIN9 Board MinutesM2799xim Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 15905 Orange County Sanitation District $ 382.689.37 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 15906 Parker Diving Services, Inc. 34,850.00 Professional Services J-394 15907 Southern California Edison 58,558.06 Power 15908 Tula RanchlMagan Fans 46,019.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 15909 Battery Specialties 22.47 Batteries 15910 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 15911 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 11,376.00 Engineering Services J40-1,J40-2 15912 Chapman&Hall I CRC Press 61.61 Publicaton 15913 Claim Jumper Restaurant 100.00 DART Luncheon Deposit 15914 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 15915 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 15916 CSUS Foundation, Inc. 107.25 Training Videos 15917 Dee Jaspers&Assoc. 2,090.25 Legal Services 15918 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 15919 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 16920 Geometrix Consultants 19,211.15 Legal Services rr 15921 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment Y 15922 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,073.25 Dues Deduction 15923 Multiform Systems Corp. 990.00 Controller Sunscreen 15924 National Plant Services, Inc. 900.00 Vacuum Truck Services 15926 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 15926 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 15927 OCFA 582.62 Dues Deduction 15928 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 15929 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 15930 Peace Officers Council of CA $46.00 Dues Deduction 15931 Reliastar 8,212.43 Life Insurance Premium 15932 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 775.97 Tools/Hardware 15933 SkillPath Seminars 597.00 On-Site Training 15934 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax 16935 The Burlington N. &Santa Fe Railway Co. 4,000.00 License Agreement 3-38-1 15936 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 1.256.00 Lab Services 15937 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 15938 POstBankFrenkfurt(50010060) 169.20 Publication 15939 WGI Solutions 170.80 Temporary Employment Services 15940 Terry H.Ahn 125.80 Training Expense Reimb. 15941 Mark A.Esquer 1,419.05 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15942 Yvonne L.Schwab 109.40 Training Expense Reimb. 15943 AKM Consulting Engineers 29.450.47 Consulting Services 11-20 15944 Bio Gro Division 27,267.24 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 15945 Carollo Engineers 342.787.87 Engineering Services-Pt-38, P2-43, MO4-14-93 15946 Dupont Engineered Services 118.199.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 15947 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 44,689.67 Engineering Services 241 15948 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,492.36 Medical Insurance Premium 15949 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 64.281.84 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 15950 Lee&Ro, Inc. 38.660.24 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 15951 Nat West Markets 66.134.56 COP Letter of Credit Fees 15952 Orange County Water District 43,210.80 GAP Water Use MO 16-23-96 15953 Pacific Investment Management 122,789.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 15954 Pacifcare of Ca. 36.585.99 Health Insurance Premium 15955 United HealthCare/Matra Health 131,784.19 Medical Health Insurance 15956 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 114,209.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 15957 Advance Constructors, Inc. 68.256.90 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5 15958 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 263.392.20 Construction 7-17 K 15959 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 251,235.90 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 7 15960 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 61,712.28 Construction 240 N 15961 The Vantage Group LLC 18,016.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 15962 American Telephone&Telegraph 24.35 Long Distance Telephone Services 15963 American Telephone&Telegraph 1,637.78 Long Distance Telephone Services 15964 American Telephone&Telegraph 23.09 Long Distance Telephone Services 15965 American Telephone&Telegraph 107.46 Long Distance Telephone Services 15966 A-Plus Systems 1,775.07 Notices&Ads 15967 Adamson Industries 1,650.90 Lab Supplies 15968 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.397.50 Engine Testing J-19 15969 Aidco Systems, Inc. 20.558.59 Engine Supplies 15970 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 243A3 Lab Supplies 15971 Airborne Express 9.25 Air Freight 15972 Allied Supply Company 5,823.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 15973 American Airlines 3,521.00 Travel Services 15974 American Management Association 150.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription 15975 Angelus Engine Center 38.66 Truck Supplies 15976 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 465.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 15977 Appleone Employment Service 828.00 Temporary Employment Services 15978 Applied Industrial Technology 137.86 Pump Supplies 15979 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 2,350.00 Lab Supplies Page 2 of 9 • s C � Claims Paid From 12/1198 to 12/16198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15980 Atlantic Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 15981 ASS Industrial Systems, Inc. 2,390.46 Electrical Supplies 15982 Assoc.of Metro.Sewerage Agency 475.00 Registration 15983 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 721.43 Printing MO 11-7-94 15984 Bearings&Drives,Inc. 975.51 Storage Containers 15985 BioSource Consulting 14,138.26 Consulting Services,-Biosolids&Watershed 15986 Boyle Engineering Corporation 19,493.00 Engineering Services 7-23 15987 Bristol Systems, Inc. 24,970.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 15988 BuyComp 1,497.11 (5)Palm III Connected Organizers w/Carrying Cases 15989 BNI Building News 185.40 Publications&Books 15990 C&H Distributions 119.80 Software License Fees 15991 California Auto Collision 431.11 Repair Kits 15992 California Automatic Gate 170.00 Service Agreement 15993 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 15994 Calolympic Safety 23,187.76 Safety Supplies-Confined Space Removal Stations @ Plants 1 &2 15995 Caltrol, Inc. 314.14 Hardware 15996 CalTrans-Publication Unit 112.00 Subscription rt 15997 Charles P.Crowley Co. 519.07 Instrument Parts 7 15998 City Office Furniture, Inc. 187.44 Ofice Supplies u+ 15999 Coast Fire Equipment 445.45 Service Agreement 16000 Communication Briefings 74.00 Communications Video 16001 Compressor Components Of Calif. 7.432.60 Pump Supplies 16002 Compuserve Incorporated 109.70 Computer Services 16003 Computers America, Inc. 1,049.65 Computer Supplies 16004 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,349.00 Electrical Supplies 16005 Consolidated Freightways 274.00 Freight 16006 Corporate Express 630.83 Office Supplies 16007 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Service Spec No. 9899-09 16008 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 71.10 Truck Parts 16009 County of Orange 140.00 Permit Fees 16010 County of Orange 1,854.21 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16011 County Wholesale Electric Co. 751.84 Electrical Supplies 16012 Culligan Water 2,304.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16013 CEM Corporation 592.37 Lab Supplies 16014 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 822.15 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer 16015 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 4,365.98 Lab Supplies 16016 CSMFO 60.00 Seminar Registration 16017 Deaver Manufacturing Co. 126.60 Truck Supplies Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16018 Del Mar Analytical 1,444.00 Biosolids Analysis 16019 Dell Marketing L.P. 21.016.69 4 Sony Monitors,3 Dell Computer Workstations 8 2 Dell Notebook Computers 16020 DeZudck 2.906.37 Valves 16021 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 16022 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 107.10 Paint Supplies 16023 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,835.07 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 16024 E.G. Heller's Son,Inc. 56.58 Subscription 16025 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 185.00 Medical Screening 16026 Electra Bond, Inc. 686.83 Mechanical Supplies 16027 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 3,600.00 CPR/First Aid Training 16028 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 16029 Enedech 555.00 Electrical Supplies 16030 Enterprise Technologies 15.234.00 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 16031 Envirowin Software, Inc. 311.00 Software 16032 Equipment Life Technology 287.32 Mechanical Supplies 16033 EDE International, Inc. 4,168.61 Risk Assessment-Y2K Project 16034 Federal Express Corp. 58.95 Air Freight n 16035 Fisher Scientific 268.86 Lab Supplies Y 16036 Flo-Systems, Inc. 65.38 Pump Supplies 16037 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying 320.00 Engineering Services P-150 16038 Fountain Valley Camera 281.83 Photo Supplies 16039 Fountain Valley Florist 11.00 Benevolence Flowers Balance 16040 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 463.12 Paint Supplies 16041 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 315.00 Truck Wash Tickets 16042 Franklin Covey 332.48 Office Supplies 16043 City of Fullerton 365.54 Water Use 16044 G.E. Supply Company 3,395.58 Electric Parts 16045 G.F.O.A. 1,242.00 Training Registration 16046 General Binding Corporation 67.95 Printing 16047 GTE California 2,110.79 Telephone Services 16048 George Yardley Co. 684.68 Lab Supplies 16049 WW Grainger, Inc. 244.09 Compressor Supplies 16050 Graphic Distributors 469.36 Photographic Supplies 16051 Graseby STI 1,437.32 Engine Supplies 16052 Great American Pdnting Co. 579.26 Printing Service 16053 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 151.60 Janitorial Supplies 16054 GTE Telephone Co.#2 30.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16055 GTE Telephone Operations 409.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16056 Harbour Engineering Group 14,283.14 Mechanical Parts 16057 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 16058 Harrington Industrial Plastics 927.56 Plumbing Supplies 16059 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 22.22 Truck Supplies 16060 Herman Miller 432.99 Office Supplies 16061 Hilton, Farnkopf&Hobson, LLC 7,078.18 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 16062 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 19.25 Compressor Parts 18063 Home Depot 2,383.23 Small Hardware&Carpet for Plant 2 Basement Room 16064 City of Huntington Beach 18.609,92 Water Use 16065 The Huntington 3.050.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16066 Imaging Plus, Inc. 406.40 Office Supplies 16067 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 188.17 Connectors 16068 Inland Press 37.87 Publications 16069 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 16070 IBM Corporation 2,360.33 Service Contract 16071 IPCO Safety-Ca 9,430.28 Safety Supplies 16072 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 585.08 Instrument Supplies rr 16073 James Engineering, Inc. 2,367.12 Consulting Services-Benchmarking Project y 16074 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 20,790.00 Miscellaneous Construction Services u, 16075 Johnstone Supply 489.83 Electrical Supplies 16076 Junior's Tools 430.95 Mechanical Supplies 16077 Kelly Paper 293.41 Paper 16078 Knox Industrial Supplies 436.41 Tools 16079 Krieger&Stewart, Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services P1-64 16080 KMI Industries, Inc. 410.53 Piping Supplies 16081 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 88.16 Safely Supplies 16082 LaserAll Corp. 168.53 Service Agreement 16083 Law/Crandall 1,322.07 Soil Testing 7-13-94 16084 LaMode Company 248.22 Sulfide Test Kit 16085 Lustre-Cal 372.41 Safety Supplies 16086 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,698.95 Cellular Telephone Service 16087 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 22,391.05 Engineering Services 2-37 16088 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.187.00 Welding Supplies 16089 Mamco International 139.00 Janitorial Supplies 16090 Mar Vac Electronics 150.88 Instrument Supplies 16091 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 7.115.60 Pump Supplies 16092 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 420.39 Tools 16093 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 613.36 Auto Parts&Supplies Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16094 Medlin Controls Co. 1.013.87 Instrument Supplies 16095 Mesa Muffler 348.00 Truck Supplies 16096 Micro Flex 568.00 Gloves 16097 Mid-West Associates 9.559.75 Pump Supplies 16098 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 16,578.20 Pump Supplies&Mechanical Repairs 16099 Mission Uniform Service 4.282.29 Uniform Rentals 16100 Monitor Labs, Inc. 978.93 Instruments 16101 The Monster Board 350.00 Job Posting on the Internet 16102 Moody's Investors Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 16103 Morton Salt 549.63 Salt 16104 Motion Industries 145.37 Pump Supplies 16105 MotoPhoto 14.58 Photographic Services 16106 Mine Safety Appliances Company 1,260.65 Safety Supplies 16107 National Plant Services, Inc. 23,257.50 Vacuum Truck Services 161 D8 Neal Supply Co. 590.09 Plumbing Supplies 16109 Network Construction Services 4,119.23 Construction Services-Wiring r 16110 New Hermes, Inc. 32.86 Tools r* 16111 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 865.69 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 110 16112 Norms Refrigeration 170.24 Electric Pans 16113 Office Depot Business Services 1,202.01 Office Supplies 16114 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 2,240.00 Temporary Employment Services 16115 Ingram Micro 150.00 Subscription 16116 Orange County Wholesale Electric 364.84 Instrument Supplies 16117 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 57.83 Fittings 16118 Ortiz Fire Protection 1,295.00 Service Agreement 16119 Oxygen Service Company 1,779.03 Specialty Gases 16120 OCB Reprographics 266.36 Printing Service-Spec P-173 16121 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 287.82 Electrical Supplies 16122 Pacific Bell 36.90 Telephone Services 16123 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services 16124 Pacific Publishers 153.40 Subscription 16125 Parts Unlimited 7.63 Truck Supplies 16126 Petco Animal Supplies 54.92 Lab Supplies 16127 Pinnacle One 4.017.50 Consulting Services 5-37-3 16128 Polydyne, Inc. 8,091.46 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16129 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin. 16130 Prima 48.50 Publication 16131 Printers Parts 32.41 Office Supplies Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 12/1198 to 12/15/98 . Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 18132 Prosum Information Technologies 4,772.00 Consulting Services-Internet Application Development 16133 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service 16134 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 16135 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 1,999.36 Trash Removal 16136 Ralphs Grocery Co.#23 282.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16137 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1,856.90 Electrical Supplies 16138 Remedy 3,178.33 Temporary Employment Services 16139 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 249.32 Metal 16140 Ryerson Tull Wholesale 810.81 Storage Containers 16141 RPM Electric Motors 2,678.06 Electric Motor Supplies 16142 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 373.79 Paint Supplies 16143 Safelite Glass Corp. 256.36 Auto Supplies 16144 SantaFe Industrial Products 122.94 Mechanical Supplies 16145 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 481.00 Lab Repairs p1 16146 Second-Sun 5D4.87 Light Fixtures 16147 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 122.84 Tools 16148 ShowCase Corporation 1,293.00 Software-Annual Malnt. Contract rt 16149 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 625.67 Tools/Hardware y 16150 Southern California Air Cond. 355.94 Electrical Supplies 16151 Spintex Company,Inc. 6.992.98 Janitorial Supplies 16152 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. 30.36 Pump Supplies 10153 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 548.54 Janitorial Supplies 16154 Successories, Inc. 89.86 Mechanical Supplies 16155 Summit Steel 179.78 Metal 16156 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 236.46 Mechanical Supplies 16157 Super Chem Corporation 484.88 Chemicals 16158 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 16159 SCTC Institute 95.00 Registration 16160 Tetra Tech EM, Inc. 2.000.00 Technical Assistance-Workshop Services 16161 The Register 808.50 Notices&Ads 16162 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 432.00 Lab Services 16163 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 131.47 Mechanical Supplies 16164 Thompson Publishing Group 248.00 Publication 16165 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 2.195.92 Locks&Keys 16166 Aerofund Financialfrop Hat Productions 259.85 Catering Services 16167 Transcat 319.56 Electrical Supplies 16168 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 238.13 Truck Supplies 16169 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 402.00 Lab Services Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 1211/98 to 12116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16170 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 24,310.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16171 TCH Associates, Inc. 900.86 Lab Supplies 16172 TEKsystems 880.00 Temporary Employment Services 16173 U.S.Postal Service 81.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16174 Ultra Scientific 471.06 Lab Supplies 16175 United Parcel Service 25.07 Parcel Services 16176 Unocal 76 72.90 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 16177 Valoom 20,153.79 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses 16178 Valley Cities Supply Company 414.82 Plumbing Supplies 16179 VWR Scientific Products 199.12 Lab Supplies 16180 Wells Supply Co. 1,579.64 Plumbing Supplies 16181 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 380.76 Electrical Supplies 16182 Xerox Corporation 12,670.07 Copier Leases 16183 YCA&Associates 1,590.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees 16184 CNA Trust 7,584.10 Construction 541-1 16186 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 857.65 Training Expense Reimb. 16186 Jeffrey Brown 250.00 Employee Travel Advance r* 16187 Jeffrey L. Jones 250.00 Employee Travel Advance 16188 Donald F, McIntyre 444.11 Meeting Expense Reimb. o' 16189 Antonin Fire 1,155.08 Training Expense Reimb. 16190 Edwin D. Ralledge 117.00 Training Expense Reimb. 16191 Merrill F. Seiler 28.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 16192 "ALGENZ NAMS Account" 251.66 Publications 16193 United Rent-All 300.00 Misc. Rentals 16194 County of Orange 3,270.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16195 Fry's Electronics and Wm. Ontiveros 611.10 Employee Computer Loan Program 16196 NexCom and Wm. Ontiveros 899.10 Employee Computer Loan Program 16197 Orange County Sanitation District 895.04 Petty Cash Reimb. 16198 Orange County Sanitation District 12,605.27 Workers Comp. Reimb. 16199 Sam Ash Music Stores 297.38 Electrical Supplies Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,050,808.65 Payroll Disbursements 11749-11897 Employee Paychecks $ 168.391.21 Biweekly Payroll 12/2198 12045-12045 Employee Paycheck 6,931.39 Termination Payoffs 12202-12223 Directors'Paychecks 4,820.20 Payroll 12115/98 32879-33318 Direct Deposit Statements 602,791.98 Biweekly Payroll 1212/98 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 802,934.78 Page 8 of 9 t •o Claims Paid From 1211198 to 12115/98 a Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Wire Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 150.391.03 December Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 207.095.35 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank 8 Trust 175,197.66 December Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Stale Street Bank S Trust 84,037.66 December FGIC Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 616,721.70 Total Claims Paid 1211198-12115198 $ 4,470,465.13 1 Y rt q Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 12/16198 to 12/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable•Warrants 16200 Duke Energy Trading 8 Marketing $ 66,817.70 Natural Gas-Spec#P•170 16201 Orange County Sanitation District 509,307.81 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 16202 Southern California Edison 45.245.26 Power 16203 Western States Chemical, Inc. 30.592.87 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 16204 Wal-Con Construction Company 265,000.00 Construction 5-37-3 16205 American Diabetes Association 100.00 Benevolence 16206 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 16207 Pongsakdi Cady 132.50 Training Expense Reimb. 16208 Cappo,Inc. 300.00 Conference Registration 16209 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 16210 James E.Colston 121.50 Meeting Expense Reimb. 16211 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 16212 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 16213 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 16214 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 16215 Inti Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,760.13 Dues Deduction 16215 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment r' 16217 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment r* 16218 OCFA 582.62 Dues Deduction T 16219 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 16220 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 16221 Peace Officers Council of CA 846.00 Dues Deduction 16222 Pioneer Publications, Inc. 3,200.00 Notices 8 Ads 16223 Radisson Hotel Sacramento 109.00 Training Registration 16224 So.Cal.Gas Company 20,110.74 Natural Gas 16225 Southern California Edison 6,017.67 Power 16226 State of California 135.62 Hazardous Waste Tax 16227 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 16228 Marco Polo S.Velasce 236.75 Training Expense Reimb. 16229 Bristol Systems, Inc. 37,844.15 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 16230 Brown And Caldwell 36,772.45 Engineering Services J-35-1 16231 Delta Dental 38.333.64 Dental Insurance Plan 16232 James Martin 8 Co. 99,792.50 Data Integration Project 16233 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 79,385.73 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 16234 Margate Construction 47,325.00 Construction Pt-36-2 16235 Network Catalyst 51,681.00 Computer Supplies 16236 Parsons Engineering Science 104,736.52 Engineering Services J-42 16237 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 78,110.82 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16238 Polydyne, Inc. 43.776.26 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16239 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 104,665.03 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 16240 Spec Services,Inc. 49,752.63 Engineering Services J-33-1 Page 1 of 7 „ Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16241 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 220,400.39 Construction 7-7-1 16242 Systems Integrated 27.964.80 Construction J-31-3 16243 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 78.611.56 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16244 United HealthCare 130,208.53 Medical Health Insurance 16246 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 39.626.87 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 16246 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 53,162.66 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 16247 The Vantage Group LLC 272.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 16248 American Telephone&Telegraph 5.54 Long Distance Telephone Services 16249 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 1.242.50 Engine Testing J-19 16250 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.20 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89 16251 Airborne Express 68.95 Air Freight 16252 Allied Supply Company 2,828.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16263 American Management Association 298.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription 16254 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services 16255 Applied Industrial Technology 216.98 Pump Supplies 16258 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 16257 Awards&Trophies By Bea 73.96 Plaques 16258 AWSI 163.00 Dept.of Transportation Training Program r 16259 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 1,100.00 Telephone Installation r* 16260 Battery Specialties 312.78 Batteries 16261 Beta Technology,Inc. 470.97 Mechanical Parts&Supplies N 16262 Bloomberg L.P. 5.268.98 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93 16263 Bolas Radiator Service 65.00 Truck Repairs 16264 Bush&Associates,Inc. 6.314.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 16265 C.S.U.F. Foundation 8,750.00 Professional Services-Center for Demographic Research 16266 Cal-Finance Journal 49.00 Subscription 16267 California Auto Refrigeration 531.27 Service Agreement 16268 Calolympic Safety 399.81 Safety Supplies 16269 Caltrol, Inc. 11,086.41 Valves 16270 Career Track Seminars MS2 395.00 Training Registration 16271 Carollo Engineers 18.181.89 Engineering Services Pl-36&P2-42 16272 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Eng 975.00 Engineering Services P1 S3 16273 Centrepoinle Commercial Interiors 6.001.07 Office Furniture 16274 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 808.45 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 18275 Huntington Beach Medical Center 3.080.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16276 Communications Perfomwnce Group 9,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Control Program 16277 Computers America,Inc. 396.48 Computer Supplies 16278 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2,604.82 Electricel Supplies 16279 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 129.35 Plumbing Supplies 16280 Converse Consultants 15,552.15 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 16281 Corporate Express 629.04 Office Supplies 16282 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 98.45 Truck Parts Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 12/16/98 to 12/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16283 Cotelllgent 750.00 Training Registration 16284 County of Orange 611.01 Communication Service Agreement 16285 County Wholesale Electric Co. 663.61 Electrical Supplies 16286 Culligan of Orange County 3.693.50 Water Softener Tank&Service 16287 CASA 540.00 Meeting Registration 16288 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 552.77 Lab Supplies 16289 David E.Libert, Ph.D. 1.625.00 Professional Services-Management Training 16290 - Dell Marketing L.P. 14.864.11 5 Dell Computer Workstations 16291 DeZudck 2.333.49 Valves 16292 Diamond H Recognition 1.918.66 Employee Service Awards 18293 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 289.18 Paint Supplies 16294 DGA Consultants, Inc. 4.752.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 16295 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1.416.00 Medical Screening 16296 Elecrio Numerics,Inc. 159.91 Electrical Supplies 16297 Enchanter, Inc. 3.500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 16298 Entek IRD International 943A9 Instrument Supplies 16299 Enterprise Technologies 22.900-10 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&V2K Project 16300 Federal Express Corp. 34.00 Air Freight 16301 Filter Supply Company 5,182.85 Filters ram+ 16302 Flo-Systems,Ina 3,905.93 Pump Supplies t`s 16303 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,497.88 Long Term Disability Premium w 16304 Fountain Valley Camera 53.67 Photo Supplies 16305 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 31.99 Truck Wash Tickets 16306 Foxboro Company 2,412.82 Instrument Supplies 16307 Franklin Covey 492.85 Office Supplies 16308 Fred Pryor Seminars 684.00 Training Registration 16309 Fry's Electronics 576.89 Computer Supplies 16310 Freiman,David A.&Kerry L. 5,000.00 Temporary Construction Easement 7-17 16311 G.E.Supply Company 899.24 Electric Pam 16312 Ganahl Lumber Company 230.59 Lumber/Hardware 16313 GTE California 8,211.26 Telephone Services 16314 W W Grainger,Inc. 478.13 Compressor Supplies 16315 Great American Printing Co. 267.79 Printing Service 16316 Voided Check - - 16317 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 122.84 Janitorial Supplies 16318 GLA-ARMA 125.00 Training Registration 16319 Hach Company 1.881.77 Lab Supplies 16320 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice 16321 Harvard Business Review 86.00 Subscription 16322 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 543.46 Truck Supplies 16323 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 37AO Catering Services 16324 Hewlett-Packard 174.04 Lab Supplies Page 3 of 7 �, ., p1 n Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12/31/98 Wamant No. Vendor Amount Description 16325 Hilti, Inc. 1,006.84 Tools 16326 Hilton,Famkopf 8 Hobson,LLC 9,683.41 Consulting Services-Office Support Study 16327 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 1,716.91 Compressor Parts 16328 Home Depot 451.71 Small Hardware 16329 Hub Auto Supply 287.17 Truck Parts 16330 City of Huntington Beach 8.529.77 Water Use 16331 Imaging Plus,Inc. 331.68 Office Supplies 16332 Industrial Filter Manufacturer 2,459.20 Filters 16333 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 142.99 Connectors 16334 Information For Public Affairs 165,00 Online Service 16335 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc. 91.46 Truck Supplies 16336 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.00 Water Use 16337 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 16338 IPCO Safety-Ca 984.23 Safety Supplies 16339 James N.Darlington 1,400.00 Consulting Services-Lab 16340 Jay's Catering 1,238.16 Catering Services 16341 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 23.070.07 Medical Insurance Premium S 16342 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,224.82 Tools c 16343 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 144.11 Safety Supplies n 16344 LaserAll Corp. 5,000.85 Service Agreement m 16345 Law/Crandall 5,476.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 16346 Lee Ann Graham/WERF 10.00 Publication 16347 Lewoo Electric Co. 118.53 Truck Supplies 16348 Lustre-Cal 372AI Safety Supplies 16349 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 7,972.34 Engineering Services 2-37 16350 Maintenance Technology Corp. 640.57 Welding Supplies 16351 Mamce International 694.99 Janitorial Supplies 16352 Mantek 836.29 Safety Supplies 16353 Mar Vac Electronics 1,966.29 Instrument Supplies 16354 Marriott Rancho Las Palmas Resort 310.00 Meeting Registration 16355 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3.954.18 Instrument Supplies 16356 Mc Junkin Corp. 2,193.01 Plumbing Supplies 16357 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1.510.77 Tools 16358 Metier, Inc. 1.200.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project 16359 Micro Flex 284.00 Gloves 16360 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 9.233.87 Mechanical Repairs 16361 Mission Uniform Service 3,213.23 Uniform Rentals 16362 Moreland 8 Associates 6,769.25 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 16363 Morgan Company 6,869.07 V-269 Pull Rig Repairs 16364 Morton Salt 562.29 Salt 16365 MotoPholo 183.87 Photographic Services Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 1211SMS to 12/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16366 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 111.27 Publications 8 Books 16367 Neal Supply Co. 977.02 Plumbing Supplies 16368 Nextel Communications 1,722.34 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time 16369 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,356.96 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 16370 The Norco Companies 22.50 Mail Delivery Service 16371 Office Depot Business Services 1,022.13 Office Supplies 16372 Olsson Construction,Inc. 22.190.60 Construction P2-39-1 16373 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 1.981.00 Temporary Employment Services 16374 Olympus America, Inc. 14.987.97 Videoimagescope B Accessories 16375 Orange County Wholesale Electric 239.71 Instrument Supplies 16376 Oxygen Service Company 1.087.19 Specialty Gases 16377 OCB Reprographics 13,648.43 Printing Service-Spec P-173 16378 Pacific Bell 1.203.62 Telephone Services 16379 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,356.01 Plumbing Supplies 16380 Pacific Publishers 58.56 Publication 16381 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 179.55 Tires 4 16382 Parts Unlimited 214.12 Truck Supplies 16383 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 599.12 Filters 16384 Petco Animal Supplies 47.38 Lab Supplies M 16385 Pinnacle One 5,136.00 Consulting Services 5-37-3 tp 16386 Pitney Bowes 352.35 Postage Machine Service Agreement u' 16387 PCI: Poly-Corr Industries 21.55 Janitorial Supplies 16388 Power Distributors, Inc. 4,500.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation 16389 Presidium,Inc. 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 16390 Procurement Services Associates 3,465.90 Professional Services-Purchasing Survey 16391 Prosum Information Technologies 2,050.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development 16392 PIHRA 99.00 Meeting Registration 16393 Quantema, Inc. 950.00 Analytical Service 16394 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,323.92 Trash Removal 16395 Reliastar 21,534.17 Life Insurance Premium 16396 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,167.72 Life Insurance Premium 16397 Remedy 8,197.42 Temporary Employment Services 16398 Robert Bein,William Frost 8 Assoc. 10,600.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 16399 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 471.20 Auto Repair 16400 Rosemount/Uniloc 665.93 Instrument Supplies 16401 RPM Electric Motors 1,734.92 Electric Motor Supplies 16402 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 103.86 Paint Supplies 16403 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,044.25 Mechanical Supplies 16404 Saratoga Institute 999.00 Training Registration 16405 Srantech,Inc. 315.00 Printing Service-Sewer System Atlas 16406 Schwing America,Inc. 1.679.23 Pump Supplies 16407 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,965.07 Specialty Gases Page 5of7 a , Claims Paid From 12116/98 to 12131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16408 City of Seal Beach 180.30 Water Use 16409 Second-Sun 311.93 Light Fixtures 16410 Self-Insurance Plans 1,494.92 State Workers'Compensation User Funding&Fraud Assessment 16411 Shannonside Construction 14,385.00 Construction-Plant 2 Surge Towers Sidewalk 18412 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,231.45 Tools/Hardware 16413 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 16414 So.Cal.Gas Company 24.84 Natural Gas 16415 Southern California Marine Institute 3,053.00 Equipment Rental-Ocean Monitoring Vessel 16418 So.California SL-1 Users Association 75.00 Membership 16417 Sprint 46.05 Long Distance Telephone Service 16418 Staples Direct 107.74 Office Supplies 16419 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 16420 Sunset Ford 403.11 Truck Supplies 16421 Swaths Electric Motor Service 1,590,69 Pump 16422 By Nielson Service, Inc. 816.00 Lab Calibration Service 16423 SCESA 160.00 Membership 16424 SKC-West, Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies 16425 Tasew, Inc. 1,520.93 Valves rt 16426 Taylor-Dunn 930.69 Electric Cart Parts 16427 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,071.15 Mechanical Supplies 16428 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services o' 16429 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 263.99 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 16430 Tran Consulting Engineers 22,400.00 Engineering Services P1-65 16431 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 15,115.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 16432 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 327.50 Truck Supplies 16433 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,390.00 Lab Services 16434 Thorpe Insulation 62.61 Plumbing Supplies 16435 Union Dodge 22,632.89 Dodge Ram Maxivan 16436 United Parcel Service 60.29 Parcel Services 16437 Unocal 76 13.16 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 16438 Valmm 6,090.52 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses 16439 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,084.62 Plumbing Supplies 16440 Verne's Plumbing 4,435.00 Plumbing Supplies 16441 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,482.30 Vision Service Premium 16442 VWR Scientific Products 3,548.36 Lab Supplies 16443 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,516.31 Security Guards 16444 Water Environment Federation 260.00 Publication 16445 Water Policy Report 695.00 Publication 16446 Waxie Sanitary Supply 680.65 Janitorial Supplies 16447 Wells Supply Co. 174.89 Plumbing Supplies 16448 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 151.31 Electrical Supplies 16449 Westrux International 266.75 Truck Supplies Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 12116198 to 12131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16450 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 3,899.50 Valves 16451 Wilmington Instrument Co., Inc. 204.63 Equipment Repair 16452 WEF-Registration Dept. 590.00 Meeting Registration 16453 Xerox Corporation 3,018.80 Copier Leases 16454 Kirk Xpedex Paper&Graphics 106.61 Office Supplies 16455 Marcus D.Dubois 150.00 Employee Travel Advance 16456 Thomas J. Mendez 989.10 Employee Computer Loan Program 16457 County of Orange 1,755.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16458 Government Finance Officers Assoc. 480.00 Financial Reporting Review Fee 16459 Orange County Sanitation District 777.70 Petty Cash Reimb. 16460 EK Development Corporation 10.400.00 Wheeler Ridge Option Agreement MO 11-18-98 16461 Orange County Sanitation District 408.649.28 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 16462 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 16463 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 16464 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 16465 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.760.13 Dues Deduction F7 16466 Office Depot Business Services 291.63 Office Supplies 16467 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment H. 16468 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction 't 16469 Poypure,Inc.&for Polydyne, Inc. 1,443.32 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16470 Stale of California 97.53 Hazardous Waste Tax 16471 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 16472 Orange County Sanitation District 4.865.12 Payroll EFT Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,318,483.11 Payroll Disbursements 11898-12044 Employee Paychecks $ 195.966.02 Biweekly Payroll 12/16/98 12046-12201 Employee Paychecks 199.467.99 Leave Accrual Payoffs 12224-12227 Employee Paychecks 3,355.75 Leave Accrual Payoffs 12228-12372 Employee Paychecks 193,835.30 Biweekly Payroll 12/30/98 12373-12374 Employee Paychecks 7,464.43 Termination&Accrual Payoffs 33319.34201 Direct Deposit Statements 1,265,226.11 Biweekly Payroll 12116&12/30/98 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1.865.315.60 Wire Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 12/16/98-12/31/98 $ 5.183.798.71 Page 7 of •, _. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date I T°ed or Dir. 2129/99 AGENDA REPORT I Item Number IrenPmber Orange County Sanitation District S( FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEGA FINDINGS N/A R.. utwpaeVn32INbeps\NPrLLEStlamwa me nmu.a. Erwva Page 1 ATTACHMENTS r 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 1/1/99 -1/15/99 & 1/16/99 — 1/31/99. BA \Yi'W.i ta11ay 0x a....a Wa Page 2 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 16473 Brown And Caldwell $ 121,457.75 Engineering Services Pi-37 16474 Canus Corporation 58,737.67 Fiber Optic Cable 16475 Carollo Engineers 39,229A7 Engineering Services P1-36&P242 16476 CH2MHil1 94.470.58 Engineering Services J-31-3 16477 Dell Marketing L.P. 61.039.32 10 Dell Computer Workstations&9 Dell Notebook Computers 16478 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 81,090.00 Painting Maint.Services MO4-22-98 16479 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 72,488.10 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 16480 Intergraph Corporation 35,732.58 Software J42 16481 Parsons Engineering Science 117,696.16 Engineering Services J42 16482 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 82,306.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16483 Science Applications Ind.,Corp. 40.507.62 Ocean Monitoring MO6-3-94 16484 Southern California Edison 46.243.00 Power 16485 Tule Ranch(Magan Fame 57,155.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16486 Advanco Constructors,Inc. 76,030.20 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5 16487 First Fire Systems,Inc. 63,826.28 Construction Contract J-67 MO 2.25.98 16488 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 138.209.73 Construction 7-17 16489 Margate Construction, Inc. 209.211.00 Construction Pt-36-2 16490 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 227,319.00 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 16491 The Vantage Group LLC 1,830.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 16492 AT&T 25.89 Long Distance Telephone Services 16493 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.85 Long Distance Telephone Services 16494 American Telephone&Telegraph 477.31 Long Distance Telephone Services 16495 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 594.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16496 Airborne Express 54.00 Air Freight 16497 Allied Supply Company 4,075.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16498 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 144.56 Instrument Supplies 16499 American Airlines 1.870.00 Travel Services 16500 Anixter, Inc. 247.93 Computer Supplies 16501 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 595.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 16502 Appleone Employment Service 10.768.29 Temporary Employment Services 16503 Armor-Vac 500.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16504 Audio Video Reporting Services 139.31 Audio Video Services 16505 Awards&Trophies By Bea 78.33 Plaques 16506 Azur Environmental 1.250.19 Lab Supplies 16507 Assoc.of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 475.00 Meeting Registration 16508 ASR Analysis 1,200.00 Vibration Analysis 7.7-1 16509 AWSI 229.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 16510 Baker Process 12,935.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16511 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,625.20 Telephone Installation Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16512 Battery Specialties 110.07 Batteries 16513 Belisle&Associates 150.80 Publications 16514 Bernardo Press 157.85 Publications 16515 Bio Gro Division 17,566.48 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 16516 Black Box Corporation 275.04 Computer Supplies 16517 Brinderson Corp 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 16518 Bristol Systems,Inc. 11,012.08 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 16519 Burke Engineering Co. 915.79 Electrical Supplies 16520 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,912.00 Surveying Services MO 6-26-97 16521 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 91.15 Rope 16622 Calif Centrifugal Pump 5,676.00 Pump Supplies 16523 California Automatic Gate 2,157.58 Service Agreement 16524 California Relocation Services 312.00 Moving Services 16525 Calolympic Safety 17.97 Safety Supplies 16526 CalTrans-Publication Unit 92.00 Publications 16527 Center for Effective Performance, Inc. 110.00 Once Supplies 16528 Charles King Company, Inc. 4,472A3 Construction 5411-1 16529 Charles P.Crowley Co. 641.55 Instrument Parts 18530 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,NA. 10,502.00 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 16531 Chrome Crankshaft Co. 1.015.00 Pump Supplies 16532 Cole Scientific 208.23 Lab Services 16533 Communication Briefings $9.00 Publications 16534 Compuserve Incorporated 24.95 Computer Services 16535 Computers America, Inc. 1,804.42 Computer Supplies 16538 Connell GM Parts 10.51 Truck Supplies 16537 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,555.14 Electrical Supplies 16538 Consolidated Plastics Company 21.80 Welding Equipment&Supplies 16539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 204.90 Plumbing Supplies 16540 Cooper Cameron Corporation 9,071.83 Engine Supplies 18541 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,432,00 Copier Lease 18542 Corporate Express Imaging 306.05 Computer Supplies 16543 Corporate Express 749.89 Office Supplies 16544 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 1.775.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 16545 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 54.68 Truck Parts 16546 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,649.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16547 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,843.61 Electrical Supplies 16548 Crane Pro Services 5.049,44 Maintenance Agreement 16649 CNEMetrics, Inc. 26.12 Lab Supplies 16550 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 470.00 CCTV Inspection of 24"Sewer 16551 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 159.47 Lab Supplies Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1/16199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16552 CR&R Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 16553 D B Sales 7,973.50 Electrical Supplies 16554 Dapper Tire Co. 2,508.97 Truck Tires 16555 Del Mar Analytical 380.00 Blosolids Analysis 16556 Dover Elevator Company 2,925.30 Elevator Maintenance 16557 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 899.13 Paint Supplies 16558 DMG-Maximus 15,960.00 Consulting Services-Finance Dept.Audit 16559 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 16560 Enterprise Technologies 8,508.00 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.&Support,FIS/CMMS Integration&Y2K Project 18561 Environmental Resources Associates 910.20 Lab Services 16562 Environmental Data Solutions Group 9.800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Into. Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project 16563 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.302.12 Professional Services-Legislative 16564 ESP Industries, Inc. 1.084.87 Mechanical Supplies 16565 Federal Express Corp. 251.80 Air Freight 16566 Filter Supply Company 468.73 Filters 16567 First American Real Estate Solutions 135.17 Orange County Property Information Subscription 16568 Fisher Scientific 533.62 Lab Supplies 16569 Flickinger Company 151.59 Valve 16570 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 8,102.60 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 16571 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 139.50 Truck Wash Tickets 16572 Franklin Covey 340.51 Training Registration&Office Supplies 16573 Fred Pryor Seminars 459.00 Training Registration 16574 Fry's Electronics 1,532.08 Computer Supplies 16575 Ganahl Lumber Company 1,615.11 Lumber/Hardware 16576 GTE California 1,087.16 Telephone Services 16577 Government Institutes, Inc. 392.00 Publications 16578 Grace Huener 1,800.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation 16579 W W Grainger, Inc. 273.15 Compressor Supplies 16680 Graybar Electric Company 1,863.81 Electrical Supplies 16681 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 380.73 Janitorial Supplies 16582 GLI International,Inc. 1,844.64 Instrument Supplies 16583 Harbour Engineering Group 19,131.89 Pump Supplies 16584 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4.014.67 Truck Supplies 16585 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 134.95 Catering Services 18586 Highway Products 5,114.28 Tool Boxes 16587 Hilti, Inc. 946.01 Tools 16588 The Holman Group 731.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium 16589 Hopkins Technical Products 248.74 Pump Supplies 16590 Horizon Technology 154.62 Lab Supplies 16591 How Magazine 34.96 Subscription Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 1/1199 to 1/15/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16692 Hub Auto Supply 268.44 Truck Parts 16593 City of Huntington Beach 13,260.83 Water Use 16594 Hydrotex 1,749.82 Lube Oil 16595 HWA Sales, Inc. 3,262.76 Electrical Supplies 16596 Imaging Plus,Inc. 630.51 Office Supplies 16597 Impulse 170.61 Mechanical Supplies 16598 Industrial Steam 438.46 Electrical Supplies 16599 Infilcc Degremont. Inc. 159.10 Mechanical Parts 16600 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service 16601 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 107.52 Lab Supplies 16602 Irvine Ranch Water District 17.82 Water Use 16603 IBM Corporation 3,912.12 Service Contract 16604 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 16605 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.684.10 Safety Supplies 16606 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 772.74 Instrument Supplies 16607 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 4,685.25 Training Expenses 16608 Jay's Catering 217.37 Catering Services 16609 Jensen Instruments Co. 657.79 Gauge 16610 Johnstone Supply 767.16 Electrical Supplies 16611 JTA Factors 688.75 Business Forms-Checks 16612 K.P.Lindstrom 6,750.00 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 16613 Kemiron PacKc, Inc. 7,697.96 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 16614 Kennedy Hydraulics 343.79 Motor Repairs 16615 Kimmede Bros.,Inc. 580.96 Mechanical Parts 16616 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,068.60 Tools 16817 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 328.81 Safety Supplies 16618 Lee&Ro,Inc. 19,412.52 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 16619 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,999.13 Cellular Telephone Service 16620 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,218.33 Welding Supplies 16621 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 180.93 Tools 16622 Medlin Controls Co. 4,620.44 Instrument Supplies 16623 Mesa Muffler 100.81 Truck Supplies 16624 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves 16625 Tri Pole Corp/MicroAge 3,578.66 HP LaserJet 8100DN Printer 16626 Mid-West Associates 6,208.60 Pump Supplies 16627 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,750.00 Mechanical Repairs 16628 Milltronics, Inc. 462.92 Electrical Supplies 16629 Mission Uniform Service 589.78 Uniform Rentals 16630 Montgomery Hardware Company 774.00 Door-Plant 2 Maim. Bldg. 16631 MotoPhotc 3.60 Photographic Services Page 4 of 9 E c . Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1116199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16632 MPS Photographic Services, Inc. 14.01 Photographic Services 16633 National Plant Services, Inc. 4,500.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16634 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 28.04 Publications&Books 16635 Voided Check - - 16636 Neal Supply Co. 1.005.20 Plumbing Supplies 16637 Newark Electronics 33.00 Instrument Supplies 16638 City of Newport Beach 59.98 Water Use 16639 Nextel Communications 1.154.45 Cellular Phones&Air Time 16640 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 11,504.81 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 16641 The Norco Companies 92.00 Mail Delivery Service 16642 NRDC Publications Department 13.75 Publication 16643 Office Depot Business Services 2.928.36 Office Supplies 16644 The Ohman Corporation 516.26 Instrument Supplies 16645 Olympus America, Inc. 13.430.61 Videoimagescope&Accessories 16646 Oracle Education 3,333.00 Training Registration 16647 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,455.55 Electrical Supplies 16648 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,347.20 Fittings 16649 Oxygen Service Company 2,391.83 Specialty Gases 16650 OCS Reprographics 246.20 Printing Service-Spec P-173 16651 Pacific Bell 36.13 Telephone Services 16652 Pacific Mechanical Supply 114.99 Plumbing Supplies 16653 Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. 278.32 Instrument Supplies 16654 Pacificare of Ca. 24,889.48 Health Insurance Premium 16655 Paco/Johnston Pump 351.96 Pump Supplies 16656 Padre Janitorial Supplies 64.65 Janitorial Supplies 16657 Pagenet 1,671.84 Rental Equipment 16658 Parts Unlimited 223.03 Truck Supplies 16659 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 189.90 Filters 16660 Pitney Bowes 2.240.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 16661 Polydyne, Inc. 4.568.19 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16662 Power Probe 1.739.65 Electro Brake Bleeder w/Adaptors 16663 Prosum Information Technologies 2,923.00 Consulting Service-Internet Application Development 16664 Reliastar 8,048.00 Life Insurance Premium 16665 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.167.72 Life Insurance Premium 16666 RM Controls 256.93 Instrument Supplies 16667 RPM Electric Motors 12.956.01 Electric Motor Repair 16668 Safelite Glass Corp. 306.46 Auto Supplies 16689 SantaFe Industrial Products 1,774.74 Mechanical Supplies 16670 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fussy Filter Test Unit Installment 16671 Sce8 Specialty Gases, Inc. 639.99 Specialty Gases Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1/16/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16672 Sears 150.83 Mechanical Supplies 16673 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.344.99 Tools/Hardware 16674 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 12,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 16675 Skalar,Inc. 209.00 Pump Supplies 16676 SkillPalh Seminars 399.00 Training Registration 16677 Snap-On Incorporated 32.37 Tools 16678 Southern California Water 56.55 Water Use 16679 Sparkleas 1.649.60 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 16680 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. 93.52 Pump Supplies 16681 Sterna Cells, Inc. 195.04 Lab Supplies 16682 Strata International,Inc, 926.98 Chemicals 16683 Summit Steel 107.24 Metal 16684 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals 16685 Taylor-Dunn 30.08 Electric Can Parts 16686 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.068.98 Mechanical Supplies 16687 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 16688 Tomell&Cotten 325.90 Legal Services 16889 Troemner,Inc. 766.76 Lab Equipment Calibration Services 16690 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 538.74 Truck Supplies 16691 TEKsystems 2,915.00 Temporary Employment Services 16692 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Lab Water Purification System Maim. 16693 The Unlsource Corporadon 6.361.56 Paper Supplies 16694 United Parcel Service 959.27 Parcel Services 16695 Valcom 11,284.98 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses 16696 Valley Cities Supply Company 917.08 Plumbing Supplies 16697 Veme's Plumbing 250.00 Plumbing Supplies 16698 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,394.10 Vision Service Premium 16699 Vortex Corp. 287.97 Door Repair 18700 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 9,689.14 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 16701 VWR Scientific Products 5,499.11 Lab Supplies 16702 Waxie Sanitary Supply 382.41 Janitorial Supplies 16703 Wayne Electric Co. 816.21 Electrical Supplies 16704 Weather Services International 3.459.00 Computer Software Service-Windows 16705 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 703.81 Safety Supplies 16706 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 1,992.40 Electrical Supplies 16707 Western States Chemical,Inc. 15,581.74 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 16708 Wlteg Scientific 1,056.11 Lab Supplies 16709 Xerox Corporation 10,960.27 Copier Leases 16710 YCA&Associates 6,360.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees 16711 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications Page 6 of 9 a� Claims Paid From 111199 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16712 CNA Trust 8,447.80 Construction 541-1 16713 Blake Anderson 206.17 Cellular Expense Reimb. 16714 Rick J. Hannappel 557.00 Training Expense Reimb. 16715 County of Orange 2,235.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16716 Orange County Sanitation District 996.88 Petry Cash Reimb. 16717 Orange County Sanitation District 394,165.03 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 16718 WCO Hotels, Inc. 48,739.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16719 Aerochem, Inc. 5,105.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16720 Aluminum Forge 1,936.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16721 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 16722 Boeing North American 107.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16723 Buena Park Community Hospital 667.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16724 Cadillac Plating 501.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16725 Century Laminators#1 1.237.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16726 Claim Jumper Restaurant 549.56 DART Luncheon Expense 16727 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 16728 Columbia West Anaheim Medical 13.034.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16729 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 56.20 Plumbing Supplies 16730 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 16731 CSMFO-1999 Annual Conference 665.00 Seminar Registration 16732 Delru Co. 186.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16733 Details, Inc. 897.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16734 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 16735 Dunham Metal Processing 761.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16736 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 16737 Gunther Athletic Service 509.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16738 Hardly Able Oil Company 203.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16739 Hinckley and Schmitt 1,487.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16740 Huntington Beach Conv. Hospital 1,867.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16741 Imperial Containers 8 Display 173.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16742 Intercem 263.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16743 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 16744 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,788.75 Dues Deduction 16745 ICN Biomedicals 849.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16746 J.R.O.Operations Trust 230.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16747 Kaynar Mfg. Div.of Kaynar Tech. 2,085.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16748 Key Circuit Co. 2.346.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16749 Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, Inc. 75.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16750 Kryler Corporation 350.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16751 KCA Electronics,Inc. 2,751.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 111/99 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16752 La Palma Intercommunity Hospital 2,465.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16753 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 51.16 Safety Supplies 16754 Lacey Custom Linens 131.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16755 LDR 123.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16756 Matrix Circuits, Inc. 410.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16757 Metal Technology, Inc. 780.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16758 Micrometals, Inc.#2 2.441.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16759 Monarch Precision Deburdng Co. 362.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16760 Murrietta Circuits 1,184.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16761 Nubilite Products,Inc. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16762 Omni Metal Finishing 1.757.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16763 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 16764 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 16765 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 234.91 Fittings 16766 OCEI 606.36 Dues Deduction 16767 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 337.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16768 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 16769 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 16770 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 16771 Polydad Laminates,Inc. 330.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16772 Ricoh Electronics 1,063.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16773 Ristorante Mamma Gina 50.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16774 RISC Transport Dynamics 292.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16775 Semiooa 183.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16776 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,065.26 ToolsMardware 16777 Sorm Biomedical 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16778 Speedy Circuits 236.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16779 State of California 136.04 Wage Garnishment 16780 Taormina Industries,Inc.#4 345.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16781 Tayco Engineering 4,495.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16782 Thermoo Systems, Inc. 1,808.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16783 U.S.Filter Corporation 286.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16784 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 314.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16785 Union Foods 1,238.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16786 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions 16787 Universal Circuits, Inc. 2,210.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16788 UOP P09152246B 1.384.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16789 US Postal Service 505.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16790 US Postal Service 232.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16791 Val Circuits#5 1,368.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 1/1/99 to 1115199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16792 Valet Car Wash 531.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16793 Willamette Industries, Inc. 3.079.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,773,595.75 Payroll Disbursements 12375-12379 Employee Paychecks $ 106.287.29 Severance Payoffs 12380.12520 Employee Paychecks 183,586.27 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99 12521.12522 Employee Paychecks 1,688.02 Termination&Payroll Adjustment 12523-12544 Directors'Paychecks 5.248.64 Payroll 1113/99 12546-12545 Employee Paychecks 1,377.58 Reissue Voided Auto Deposit 34202.34644 Direct Deposit Statements 817,134.66 Biweekly Payroll 1/13/99 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 915,322.46 Wiro Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 151,679.61 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 226.958.62 January Interest Payment on 1990.92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank&Trust 187,998.08 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 566.530.31 Total Claims Paid 111199-1/15/99 $ 4,255,454.52 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116/99 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 16794 Anna L.Piercy $ 340.00 Director Travel Advance 16795 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 45.803.60 O& M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 16796 Carollo Engineers 29.724.67 Engineering Services Pi-36&P242 16797 Cummins Cal Pacific, Inc. 124,720.63 (2)200 KW Emergency Generators w/frailers 16798 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 76,704.15 Engineering Services 2-41 16799 James Martin&Co. 108,682.50 Data Integration Project 16800 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 144,035.47 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 16801 Orange County Water District 42,695.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 16802 Pacificare of Ca. 33,622.26 Health Insurance Premium 16803 Pima Gm Systems,Inc. 170.031.19 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 16804 Polydyne, Inc. 39.011.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 16805 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 35,025.23 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 16806 Southern California Edison 31,441.69 Power 16807 SPEC Services,Inc. 96,434.92 Engineering Services J-33-1 16808 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 92,467.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 16809 United HeallhCare 129,809.32 Medical Health Insurance 16810 Valcom 29,781.35 Software-Seagate Crystal Licenses 16811 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 73,691.92 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 16812 Water Environment Research Foundation 69,000.00 Membership 16813 Western States Chemical,Inc. 26,827.64 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 16814 The Vantage Group LLC 24,880.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 16815 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.82 Long Distance Telephone Services 16816 American Telephone&Telegraph 2,106.01 Long Distance Telephone Services 16817 American Telephone&Telegraph 21.08 Long Distance Telephone Services 16818 AccuStandard 529.88 Lab Supplies 16819 Airgas Lyons Safety 310.42 Safety Supplies 16820 American Society of Civil Engineers' 2,254.50 Registration 16821 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 545.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 16822 Appleone Employment Service 11,746.28 Temporary Employment Services 16823 Applied Industrial Technology 662.13 Pump Supplies 16824 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies 16825 Armor-Vac 1.105.00 Vacuum Truck Services 16826 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 16827 Atlantis Pool Care 470.00 Service Agreement 16828 Awards&Trophles By Bea 148.37 Plaques 16829 Azur Environmental 762.53 Lab Supplies 16830 ABM Business Machines, Inc. 1,113.08 Office Supplies 16831 ACT Group Inc. 487.13 Service Agreement 16832 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.592.81 Consulting Services 11-20 Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16833 American Compensation Assoc. 930.00 Registration 16834 ARK Technologies 14,212.00 Data Processing 16835 Battery Specialties 1,386.36 Batteries 16836 Bio Gro Division 17,048.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 16837 BioSource Consulting 11,553.73 Consulting Servicce-Biosolids&Watershed 16838 Boyle Engineering Corporation 15,924.94 Engineering Services 7-27 16839 Brinderson Corp 500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 16840 Bristol Systems, Inc. 5,150.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 16841 Bush&Associates,Inc. 11,090.00 Surveying Services MO6-25-97 16842 Business Objects Americas 4,972.85 Software-Data Whse/lntergration Project 16843 Business Week 37.95 Subscription 16844 BuyComp 22,908.48 Computer Supplies-10 Network Switches 16845 BBR Surveying Instruments 111.40 Instrument Supplies 16846 CWEA 45.00 Membership 16847 Calolympic Safety 1.988.95 Safety Supplies 16848 Camali Corp 4,562.50 Service Agreement 16849 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 6.034.15 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-2 16850 Career Track Seminars MS2 596.00 Seminar Registration 16851 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 583.88 Office Furniture 16852 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,444.45 Professional Services-Ergonomic 16853 Color Arts,Inc. 530.00 Vehicle Decals 16854 Compressor Components Of Calif 6,141.75 Pump Supplies 16855 Computers America,Inc. 3,020.87 Computer Supplies 16856 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 478.46 Electrical Supplies 16857 Consolidated Plastics Company 95.40 Welding Equipment&Supplies 16858 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 226.14 Plumbing Supplies 16859 Converse Consultants 1,128.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 16660 Cooper Cameron Corporation 550.00 Engine Supplies 16861 Corporate Express Imaging 369.80 Computer Supplies 16862 Corporate Express 599.42 Office Supplies 16863 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11,700.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 16864 Cost Containment Solutions 702.56 Workers Comp.Services 16865 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 45.14 Truck Parts 16866 County of Orange 74.57 Administrative Fees 16867 County of Orange 595.00 Permit Fees 16868 County of Orange 1,335.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 16869 County Wholesale Electric Co. 32.16 Electrical Supplies 16870 Crane Pro Services 11.308.94 Maintenance Agreement 16871 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 16872 Cytec Industries, Inc. 15.477.65 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131/99 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16873 CASA 205.00 Conference Registration 16874 CEPA Company 1,010.00 Equipment Maint.Service 16875 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 124.62 Lab Supplies 16876 CR 8 R. Inc. 2.205.00 Container Rentals 16877 CSMFO 40.00 Registration 16878 CWEA 115.00 Registration 16879 Dapper Tire Co. 801.03 Truck Tires 16880 Datavault 219.00 OBshe Back-Up Tape Storage 16881 DataCard Services 459.17 Equipment Maint. 16882 David's Tree Service 450.00 Tree Removal 16883 De Guelle 8 Sons Glass Co. 106.33 Safety Glass 16854 DGA Consultants, Inc. 1,224.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 16885 DTSC 192.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 16886 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 74.00 Medical Screening 16887 Edison EV 7,100.48 EV Charging Station Installation 16888 Electra Bond,Inc. 1,203.57 Mechanical Supplies 16889 Electro Numerics,Inc. 257.00 Electrical Supplies 16890 Electro-Test,Inc. 904.00 Electrical Supplies 16891 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 16892 Enterprise Technologies 11.882.80 Consulting Services-FIS Impl.8 Support,FIS/CMMS Integration 8 Y2K Project 16893 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,103.47 Professional Services-Legislative 16894 FIIeNET Corporation 15.731.61 Computer Software 16895 Fisher Scientific 1,292.00 Lab Supplies 18896 Flo-Systems,Inc. 7.466.98 Pump Supplies 16897 Forked Engineering&Surveying 9.840.00 Engineering Services P-150 16898 Franklin Covey 940.90 Office Supplies 16899 Fry's Electronics 162.89 Computer Supplies 16900 FM Intemational,fric. 1.000.00 Service Agreement-RFPfor the Engineering Document Mgmt System 16901 Garraft-Callahan Company 560.30 Chemicals 16902 Gartner Gmup 395.00 Subscription 16903 Gates Fiberglass Installers 750.00 Fiberglass Repair 16904 GTE California 7,792.46 Telephone Services 16905 George T.Hall Co. 1.494.16 Mechanical Supplies 16906 Global Engineering 8 Management 3.690.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention 16907 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 16908 Grace Huener 2.430.00 Consulting Services-ODES Data Preparation 16909 WW Grainger,Inc. 67.43 Compressor Supplies 16910 Graphic Distributors 691.76 Photographic Supplies 16911 Graseby STI 4,305.07 Engine Supplies 16912 Great American Printing Co. 255.99 Printing Service Page 3 of 9 b Claims Paid From 1H6199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16913 GE Mullilin Inc. (Repairs) 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair 16914 GS Edwards Systems Technology 315.00 Lab Equipment Repair 16915 GST, Inc.I Micro City 33.84 Office Supplies 16916 GTE Hawaii 190.86 Telephone Services-3 Way Conference Call 16917 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 439.26 Truck Supplies 16918 Herb's Slackforest Bakery&Deli 68.00 Catering Services 16919 Home Depot 105.02 Small Hardware 16920 Hub Auto Supply 49.19 Truck Parts 16921 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 3.171.50 Software Licenses 16922 HWA Sales,Inc. 1,586.08 Electrical Supplies 16923 Imaging Plus,Inc. 706.53 Office Supplies 16924 Implemented Designs,Inc. 500.00 IT Computer Room Floor Refurbishing 16925 Impulse 211.74 Lab Supplies 16926 Industrial Air Compressor 286.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16927 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 26.03 Connectors 16928 Information Resources 200.00 Personnel Services 16929 Interstate Battery Systems 501.68 Batteries 16930 Irvine Ranch Water District 54.54 Water Use 16931 IBM Corporation 10,841.33 Service Contract 16932 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,889.27 Safety Supplies 16933 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,281.64 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 16934 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 24,609.26 Mice.Construction Services 16935 Jay's Catering 313.18 Catering Services 16936 Jobtrak 108.00 Notices&Ads 16937 Knowledge Point 1,608.75 Software Maim,Agreement 16938 Knox Industrial Supplies 559.35 Tools 16939 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company 808.54 Cellular Telephone Service 16940 LaserAll Corp. 1,204.47 Service Agreement 16941 LaMotte Company 55.57 Sulfide Test Kit 16942 League of Ca.Cities,Orange County Div. 95.00 Publications 16943 Lessons in Leadership 1,116.00 Seminar Registration 16944 Lexis-Nexis 325.00 Publications 16945 Liebed, Cassidy&Frierson 1,595.00 Membership 16946 Long Beach Line-X 357.38 Truck Supplies 16947 Los Angeles Oracle Users Group 495.00 Membership 16948 JLM Gen.Contracting&Environmental 23,868.00 Manhole Repair 16949 Mar Vac Electronics 21.54 Instrument Supplies 16950 Martin McIntosh Land Surveying 10,609.45 Professional Services-Traffic Study 16951 Matt Chlor, Inc. 3.319.01 Valves 16962 Me Junkin Corp. 209.28 Plumbing Supplies Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16953 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 738.86 Tools 16954 Micro Motion, Inc. 1.152.77 Electrical Supplies 16955 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4.981.89 Mechanical Repairs 16956 Mission Uniform Service 4,531.53 Uniform Rentals 16957 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 16958 Motion Industries 360.12 Pump Supplies 16959 Multiform Systems Corp. 1,876.00 Computer Equip. Services-Fuel Mgmt. System 16960 MPS Photographic Services 16.17 Photographic Services 16961 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 16962 National Assoc.of Regional Councils 275.00 Registration 16963 National Mlcrocomp Services 4.090.00 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 16964 National Technical Information 82.50 Publications 16965 Neal Supply Co. 2,220.46 Plumbing Supplies 16966 Network Solutions Group 980.00 Cable Installation Specification 16967 New Hermes,Inc. $96.31 Tools 16968 Newark Electronics 718.81 Instrument Supplies 16969 Nextel Communications 688.88 Cellular Phones&Air Time 16970 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 6,917.03 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 16971 Ninyo B Moore 449.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 16972 Northwestern Carbon 1,389.55 Filters 16973 Office Depot Business Services 1.429.59 Office Supplies 16974 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 196.00 Temporary Employment Services 16975 Orange County Sanitation District 19,758.54 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 18976 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 23.77 Plumbing Supplies 16977 Orange County Forum 300.00 Conference Registration 16978 Orange County Sanitation District 418.05 Petty Cash Reimb. 16979 Orange County Wholesale Electric 478.35 Electrical Supplies 16980 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 301.53 Fillings 16981 Oxygen Service Company 1,077.03 Specialty Gases 16982 OCB Reprographics 1,123.51 Printing Service-Spec P-173 16983 Pacific Bell 89.64 Telephone Services 16984 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services 16985 Pacific Mechanical Supply 388.39 Plumbing Supplies 16986 Pacific Publishers 30.78 Publication 16987 Pagenet 1,901.51 Rental Equipment 16988 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 665.59 Time 16989 Parts Unlimited 741.60 Truck Supplies 16990 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 3,520.75 Filters 16991 Petco Animal Supplies 68.99 Lab Supplies 16992 Pinnacle One 34.32 Consulting Services 6-37-3 Page 5 of 9 ti Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 16993 Power Bros. Machine,Inc. 815.36 Mechanical Maint. 16994 Presidium, Inc. 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 16995 Public Financial Management, Inc. 7,500.00 Arbitrage Consulting Services 16996 PC Magazine 54.97 Subscription 16997 PCS Express 99.00 Courier Service 16998 PIHRA 90.00 Membership 16999 R. L.Abbott&Associates 2,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 17000 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 414.06 Trash Removal 17001 Randolph Austin Co. 666.00 Lab Supplies 17002 Red Wing Shoes 161.19 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 17003 Regents of University of Calif. 330.00 Registration 17004 Reliance Electric Industrial Co. 1.286.41 Electrical Supplies 17005 Remedy 7,191.04 Temporary Employment Services 17006 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 450.00 Video Production Service 17007 RPM Electric Motors 296.31 Electric Motor Repair 17008 Safety-Kleen 840.00 Service Agreement 17009 Sand Dollar Business Forms 310.32 Printing Supplies 17010 SantaFe Industrial Products 466.46 Mechanical Supplies 17011 Sanorius Corporation 195.80 Publications 17012 Schreiber Corporation 22,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filter Test Unit Installment 17013 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 404.06 Specialty Gases 17014 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 3,748.00 Lab Repairs 17015 Seagate Software 6,916.48 Software Maint.Agreement 17016 Second-Sun 117.37 Light Fixtures 17017 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 707.53 Tools 17018 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,483.13 Tools/Hardware 17019 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 15,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 17020 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 1.286.74 Lab Supplies 17021 Skater, Inc. 271.00 Pump Supplies 17022 Snap-On Incorporated 130.57 Tools 17023 So.Cal.Gas Company 16,814.23 Natural Gas 17024 South Coast Water 10.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 17025 Sparkletts 2.094.02 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 17026 State Board of Equilization 445.16 Underground Storage Tank Fee 17027 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 624.00 Janitorial Supplies 17028 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4,879.01 COP Trustee Services 17029 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 17030 Summit Steel 1,797.58 Metal 17031 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 17032 Sunset Ford 85.60 Truck Supplies Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 1116199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17033 Sunset Industrial Parts 122.94 Mechanical Supplies 17034 SARBS-PDC 250.00 Training Registration 17035 Target Specialty Products 99.00 Registration 17036 Tekmar Company 185.13 Lab Supplies 17037 Tektronix, Inc. 699.87 Instrument Supplies 17038 Theme Jarrell Ash Corp. 10,800.00 Lab Equipment Maint. Service 17039 Thermo Quest 2.300.00 Lab Maint.Service 17040 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 563.88 Mechanical Supplies 17041 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 340.70 Truck Supplies 17042 TEI(systems 7,216.00 Temporary Employment Services 17043 U.S. Filter Corporation 2,525.50 Lab Water Purification System Maint. 17044 Ultra Scientific 84.87 Lab Supplies 17045 Union Dodge 18.075.06 1999 Dodge 1500 Pick-up 17046 University of Nevada, Las Vegas 750.00 Seminar Registration 17047 Valley Cities Supply Company 4.640.60 Plumbing Supplies 17048 Vortex Corp. 516.00 Door Repair 17049 VWR Scientific Products 4.294.67 Lab Supplies 17050 The Wackenhut Corporation 11.795.88 Security Guards 17051 Water Environment Federation 967.84 Publications&Ads 17052 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 215.44 Safety Supplies 17053 Western Highway Products, Inc. 305.33 Pavement Marker Supplies 17054 WEF Membership 120.00 Membership 17055 Xerox Corporation 3.611.29 Copier Leases 17056 3 Com Palm Computing, Inc. 118.42 Publications 17057 991&HW-CWEA,Inc. 225.00 Registration 17058 Nicholas J.Amontes 150.00 Employee Travel Advance 17059 Dell Home Systems,Co.&S.Howard 11.463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program 17060 Michael L. Fetterman 968.78 Employee Computer Loan Program 17061 Victoria L.Raymond 1.987.01 Employee Computer Loan Program 17062 John D.Stephens 1,463.15 Employee Computer Loan Program 17063 Robert J.Thistle 2,421.90 Employee Computer Loan Program 17004 Edward R.Eisenhauser 1,600.00 Professional Service-Financial 17065 J.D.Edwards Word Solutions Company 500.00 Training Expenses 17066 Aladdln House 74.48 Window Blinds 17067 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 230.87 Mechanical Supplies 17088 Appleone Employment Service 390.00 Temporary Employment Services 17069 Court Order 518.90 Wage Garnishment 17070 BOC Edwards 791.96 Lab Supplies 17071 Calif Centrifugal Pump 674.52 Pump Supplies 17072 Canus Corporation 2,991.72 Fiber Optic Cable Page 7 of T- Claims Paid From 1/16199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17073 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 17074 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 1,123.38 Electrical Supplies 17075 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 17076 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Gamishment 17077 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads 17078 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 17079 Franchise Tax Board 337.82 Wage Garnishment 17080 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 17081 Geomatrix Consultants 8,336.02 Legal Services 17082 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 446.95 Truck Supplies 17083 Intergraph Corporation 6.671.88 Annual Software Maint. 17084 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 17085 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1.788.75 Dues Deduction 17086 Airgas Direct Ind.•IPCO Safety Div. 693.11 Safety Supplies 17087 J.Spencer Freebalrn 201.12 $A Watershed Briefing 17088 Kelar Corp 15,000.00 Professional Services-Project Mgmt. Fundamentals Guide 17089 Maintenance Technology Corp. 80.74 Welding Supplies 17090 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 682.60 Tools 17091 Melvin Schwartz,MO 1,750.00 Legal Services 17092 Network Construction Services 7,653.61 Construction Services-Wiring for J-42 17093 Neysa M.Call 1,049.77 SA Watershed Briefing 17094 Office Pavilllon 348.64 Office Furniture 17095 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment 17096 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 17097 Orange County Wholesale Electric 4,535.18 Electrical Supplies 17098 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 445.45 Fittings 17099 OCEA 815.61 Dues Deduction 17100 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 17101 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 17102 Peace Officers Council of CA 828.00 Dues Deduction 17103 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 7.960.00 Englneering Services-Tunnels Evaluation 17104 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 462.33 Paint Supplies 17105 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 166.11 Tools 17106 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,392.04 Tools/Hardware 17107 Slemon, Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 17108 Skalar, Inc. 51.52 Pump Supplies 17109 Snap-On Incorporated 70.33 Tools 17110 So.Cal.Gas Company 28.06 Natural Gas 17111 Southern California Edison 20,103.58 Power 17112 Sprint 56.85 Long Distance Telephone Service Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 1MO199 to 1131199 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 17113 State of California 108.18 Wage Garnishment 17114 Surveyors Service Company 105.57 Tools 17115 Thomas M. Dawes, P.E. 9,860.00 Professional Services MO 4.23-97 17116 Thompson Industrial Supply, In 925.08 Mechanical Supplies 17117 Tomell 8 Cotten 536.80 Legal Services 17118 Tub Ranch/Magan Fans 21,750.00 Permit Fees 17119 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 17120 United Way 306.50 Employee Contributions 17121 VWR Scientific Products 356.80 Lab Supplies 17122 CASA-Biosolids EIR 25,000.00 Statewide Blosolids Land Application EIR Funding 17123 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 26,731.11 Medical Insurance Premium 17124 Orange County Sanitation District 472,264.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 17125 Mar Vac Electronics 124.90 Instrument Supplies Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2.783.184.34 Payroll Disbursements 12546-12737 Employee Paychecks $ 112,519.88 Leave Accrual,Termination 8 BOP Payoffs 12738-12878 Employee Paychecks 187.702.59 Biweekly Payroll 1127/99 12879-12890 Employee Paychecks 1,182.60 Shift Differential Adjustments 34645-35086, Direct Deposit Statements 644,151.04 Biweekly Payroll 1127199 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 945,558.11 Wire Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 1116199-1/31/9 9 $ 3,728,740.45 Page 9 of 9 �.-. DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, January 27, 1999 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Peer Swan, Chair pro tem Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Ryal Wheeler Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Gary Streed, Director of Finance Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Vice Chair Swan was appointed Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the December 16, 1998 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were approved as drafted. 1- Minutes of the Steering Committee - Page 2 January 27, 1999 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair pro tem Swan asked that a discussion of the Human Resources survey results be placed on the February FAHR Committee agenda. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that he received a request from the League of Cities to help sponsor Richard Rodriguez at their February meeting. There was no objection, however a complimentary ticket will be requested for Director Swan. Mr. McIntyre also mentioned that staff attended the State of the County update presented by Supervisor Smith that was sponsored by the Orange County Forum. he was supporting watershed management as a new initiative. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, and Mr. McIntyre attended a salinity seminar earlier in the day, and Blake described some of the more important issues. At this time, very little has been done about this problem. Mr. Swan said that IRWD had performed a study about ten years ago that addressed this issue. There is a new report available on brine water management. Blake can provide copies. The County has filed a Notice of Preparation for an EIR on additional bridge crossings over the Santa Ana River. Two proposed crossings would impact Plant 2 and one would affect Plant 1. The District will comment on this EIR for the record. Last Friday there was an incident on site that resulted in one of our Y2K consultants being accosted and her car stolen. The police are investigating. Staff held a briefing and changes will be made to security procedures. The General Manager will report on this in his February letter to the Board members. Update on Btosolids Issues: Mr. Anderson reported that the Kern County Board of Supervisors voted to extend the existing biosolids ordinance for another year. It will expire in January 2000. It is anticipated that a revised ordinance will be presented to the Supervisors in the fall of 1999. The option on purchasing the Wheeler Ridge site has been terminated as a result of the due diligence. Three endangered animal species and one plant species were identified and the mitigation measures would be unacceptable. Staff was directed to continue looking for opportunities in Kern County. Update on Matters re Santa Ana Watershed Protect Authority (SAWPA): Mr. Anderson will report on this at the next Steering Committee meeting. Update on Y2K Action Plan: The update was moved to be included in agenda item B.C. ' Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 January 27, 1999 Mr. McIntyre also reported that to date cooperative projects applications have been received that total about $5 million. The due date is Friday, January 29. At the February 2 Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee, these applications will be considered. A report will be presented to the Steering committee with funding recommendations and then to the Board for approval. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-G) A. Two-year Limit for Connection Fee Credits Two requests for waiving the two-year limit have been received. After discussion staff was directed to send the item to the FAHR Committee for further review of the options identified in the agenda report. B. Michelson Pump Station Drainage Area In an effort to negotiate with Trammel Crow, staff has initiated meetings with IRWD to discuss the possibility of IRWD providing sewer service to this drainage area. The members directed staff to continue discussing alternatives with IRWD and to perform the due diligence necessary to transfer the area to IRWD. The tolling agreement with Trammel Crow will have to be extended. C. Y2K Emergency Purchasing Authority The Steering Committee agreed to allow the General Manager to sign purchase orders for Y2K-related items under the Emergency Purchasing Authority. The General Manager will report to the Board when and if he exercises this authority. D. Steering Committee/EMT Retreat Discussion Items The Steering Committee members asked that further revisions be made. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, will review recommendations from the members, review with the Chair and finalize the agenda based on comments received from the members. E. Consider Adjusting 1999 Board And Steering Committee Meeting Dates The Steering Committee will recommend to the Board the following meeting date changes: 1. July 28 to July 21 (conflict with League of CA Cities meeting) 2. November 24 to November 17 (Thanksgiving holiday) 3. December 22 to December 15 (Christmas Week) Minutes of the Steering Committee ' Page 4 January 27, 1999 F. Consider'98-99 Performance Objectives for General Manager The members decided to delay this discussion until February when Chair Debay would be present. G. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to Be Presented to Committees in February The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees was reviewed. Pat McGuigan, OMITS Committee Chair, indicated that there was only one report item on the OMITS Committee agenda she would like to cancel the February meeting. An announcement will be made at the Board meeting after discussing this with Ed Hodges. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 24, 1999 at 5 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. ubmitted by: '� e n Tappan S ering Committee Secretary M11O EYW@� ME/ CWMTEE W-QW12MX Uri pa DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, February 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, February 4, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Steve Anderson John Linder, Construction Manager John Collins, Past Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Lynn Daucher Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Jack Mauller Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Eva Miner-Bradford Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Russell Patterson Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Board Chair Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Christina Shea (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 0CSD • P O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) %2-2411 Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 2 February 4, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the December 3, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering introduced the Engineering Department staff to the new Committee members. He advised they would be meeting other staff members of the Engineering Department as staff attends the meetings to support their agenda items. The Director of Engineering announced plans to hold a "special" meeting for the new Committee members. This meeting will be beneficial for new members to learn the process of the Engineering Department including design efforts, the bid process, awarding of contracts, construction management, and change orders. He and Chair Eckenrode advised that the Committee members would be contacted to find out their preference of days and times to have the meeting. We will know the date by the next meeting. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 February 4, 1999 (11) QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSAs AND ADDENDA Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly PSAs and Addenda Report. (12) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. a-f) a. PDC99-01: Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.41, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-5, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP199500021, and Sludge Piping Modifications at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 at Plant No, 1, SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of $80,061 and 56 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,962,766. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve this item with the correction of the change order summary table, item 5, on page three of the Agenda Report. The type of change order was corrected from "design change"to "omission." b. PDC99-02: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-40, with Nationwide Construction Company, Inc. authorizing an addition of$95,820 and 89 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $526,290. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item c. PDC99-03: Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Olsson Construction, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 4 February 4, 1999 d. PDC99-04: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, with Advanco Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$133,279 increasing the total contract amount to $7,763,086; and (2)Accept Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Bell Access, SP19950003, as complete, authorizing a Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. e. PDC99-05: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$4,200,000, for a total budget of$10,125,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. I. PDC99-06: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $109,860, for a total amount not to exceed $626,290. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. (14) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 5 February 4, 1999 (18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 4, 1999. (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: dG Y. �',r-"/ Gail Cain PDC Committee Secretary H:Rvp. Wi rgTDCWDCWFEBWhi esAm PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Dale T. of N1. 2/4/99 2/24/99 AGENDA REPORT t e wn n rvumEe Item Num r Purn 3 D C Orange County Sanitation Di riot FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE (TWAS) FEED TO DIGESTERS F AND G AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NUMBER P2-39-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Olsson Construction, Inc. SUMMARY Job Number P2-39-1 included the installation of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) piping and associated controls to Digesters F and G. Lee and Ro prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Olsson Construction, Inc. on February 4, 1998- This project has been completed. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 98,950.00 Total Contract Change Orders $ 4,098.00 Percentage Increase 4.14% Final Adjusted Amount $103,048.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 8.4.e) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Project is exempt. Notice of exemption was filed on March 17, 1988. c Ntq�e• w Rwwewocnaaiurtm. w Page 1 r CEQA FINDINGS Project is exempt. Notice of exemption was filed on March 17, 1988. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report UM:IC o1.1A.� 2,9 Paget BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F & G JOB NO. P2-39-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ;UT POSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIONOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED' BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST RIZATION TODATE TO�DATE(%) Project Development $ Design Staff $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ LConstrudontract $ 110,550 $ 110.550 $ 110,550 $ 103,048 $ 103,048 $ 98,950 96% er) $ $ $ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80,450 $ 80.450 $ 48,584 60% $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ -$ 200,000 $ 200.000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 183,498 $ - $ 183,498 $ 147,534 80% hWp.dtalen9lror ftW get taM Fmm RwsW 1V17198 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F AND G Job No. 132-39-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 2/4198 $ 98,950.00 $ 98,950.00 230 230 CO NO. 1 11/9/98' $ 4,098.00 $ 103,048.00 4.14% 0 230 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 H:...P2-39-1lCloseout Status Report PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dap! TOM.of Dir. 2141 9 2/14o Num ber 19 AGENDA REPORT Item ItemN r4 0 Orange County Sanitation DI VC, FROM: David Ludw, hector of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, JOB NO. J-34-1; PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-35-5; AND CONVEYOR BELT ACCESS, SP19950003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, with Advanco Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$133,279 increasing the total contract amount to $7,763,086; and (2) Accept Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1; Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5; and Conveyor Belt Access, SP19950003, as complete, authorizing a Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 8 includes twelve items of added work and two items of deleted work to Job No. J-34-1 and two items of added work to Job No. P2-35-5. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. This project has been completed. The budget reallocation is needed to transfer funds from the Construction Contract to the Construction Staff within the project budget. Authorization is needed for expenditures of the proposed revised budget. The budget reallocation does not increase the total project budget. Change Order No. 7 contained an item, which involved modifications to Surge Tower No. 1. The District was reimbursed for all of the associated costs. Item No. 14 of Change Order No. 8, contains extra costs for site grading at Plant No. 2. This work was not part of the original contract. The work was performed in this contract to expedite the construction of storm water retention basins at the north end of Plant No. 2. Gwglobel'Agenda Dree RepotleWDCW-WAIT-008.dot Revised 01I11W S • PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 7,122,693.00 Previous Authorized Changes 507,114.00 This Change Order (Add)(DedUGt-) 133,279.00 Change Orders to Date 640,393.00 Percent Increase 8.99% Amended Contract Price $7,763,086.00 The Change Order percentage on this contract was greatly affected by two items of extra work. One item involved $299,900, for which the District was reimbursed the entire amount. The second item was work not associated with this contract in the amount of$98,927. Without including these changes, the Change Order percentage of this contract was 3.40%. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORF C.5.a and B.6.a) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, consists of improving the reliability of the standby Ocean Ouffall Pipeline by constructing a new Surge Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. Job No. P2-35-5, Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements, consists of miscellaneous site and landscape improvements at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for Job No. J-34-1 were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-35-5 was prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The construction contract for these jobs was awarded to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in November 1996. This contract is complete. GlAglobalWgenda Draft ReponslPDCU-341AR-008.do1 Revised:01/11199 V The following summarizes the Change Order: ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Lower Platform Revisions at Valve $ 1,512 0 Changed Boxes 3 and 4 Condition 2 Additional Work to Plant Palm Trees 325 0 Design Change 3 6dra Work to Sandblast Exledor of 1,380 0 Changed Surge Tower No. 2 Condition 4 Additional Footage of Electrical Dud 7,856 0 Changed Banks Conditions 5 Additional Guard Post 553 0 Design Change 6 Vent Pipe Support at Surge Tower 7,895 0 Design Change No. 2 7 Reroute Branch Circuits from MCC- 1,651 0 Changed RASE4 Lighting Panel to RASE-1 Conditions Liahtina Panel 8 Additional Handrail at Top of Surge 889 0 Design Change Tower No. 2 9 Pressure Grout 120-inch Pipe Joint 2.892 0 Design Change at Surge Tower No. 1 10 Delete Paint Work Inside Surge (3,900) 0 Design Change Tower No.2 11 Install Class B in Lieu of Class D (2,535) 0 Design Change Flanges 12 120-Inch Pipe Test 475 0 Design Change 13 Control Wires for Surge Tower 1,200 0 Design Change Bubbler Panels 14 Site Grading at Plant No.2 98,927 0 Work Not Related to Contract 15 Additional Paving and Landscaping 10,460 0 Design Change Work 16 Pothole for 12-inch Pipe at Vile 5 3.709 0 Changed Condition TOTAL-Change Orde No.B 14 133,279 0 These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract I discovered in the design phase. A budget revision is needed to reallocate funds within the total project budget. The revision provides for authorization to increase the proper budget line item for Construction Staff by transferring funds from the Construction Contract. This is a project with a budget established several years ago and as such, District Construction Staff costs were underestimated and not fully burdened with overhead costs. ALTERNATIVES None GMIglobaaAgenda Draft Reports'PDCV-347AIT-008401 Revised:01tIIW c CEQA FINDINGS Final EIR approved on July 1989 and Notice of Determination filed on February 9. 1995. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order UM:lc GrnlglobarAgenda Draft ReporlsNDCV341A1T-COSAW Revised:01111IN BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NOS. J-34-1 & P2-35-5 9P— ProjectDRO PROPC 'FU1ID8 ✓' THIS 'w tPR01� K' OR¢F,Dq� ORIZE� E TO DATE� +V4 ' Development $ - �. $ I Desi n Staff $ $ - ConsuBant PW $ 725,000 $ 725,000 $ 725,000 ° $ 725,000 $ 725,000 $ 696.7601 96% Construction Contract $ 7,478,883 $ 8,880,862 $ 1 117 776 $ 7,763,086 ' $ 7,629,807 $ 133,279 $ 7,763,085 $ 7 520 055 97% a Construction Other $ $ Staff $ 177,117 $ 408,776 $ 842984 E 1 251 7 408.776 $ 842,964 $ 1,251 740 $ 1,120,229 89% Contnaency E 274812 $ 274812 " $ TOTAL $ 8,381,000 $ 10.014,638 $ $ 10,014,638 $ 8,763,583 $ 976,243 1 $ 9,739,826 $ 9.337,044 96% h.W, t Wn9V�nd cwtma UJe-1CMu49et teWe CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Job Nos. J-34.1, P2-35-5, and SP19950003 APPROVAL CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS( (DAYS) CONTRACT 1/9/97 $ 7,122,693.00 $ 7,122,693.00 0.00% 730 730 CO NO. 1 6/25/97 $ (4,170.00) $ 7,118,523.00 -0.06% 0 730 CO NO. 2 1 8/27197 $ 50.415.00 $ 7,168,938.00 0.65% 0 730 CO NO. 3L99,900.00 24,570.00 $ 7,193,508.00 0.99% 0 730 CO NO.4 20,168.00 $ 7,213,676.00 1.28% 0 730 CO NO. 5 71,557.00 $ 7,285,233.00 2.28% 0 730 CO NO. 6• 44,674.Oo $ 7,329,907.00 2.91% 0 730 CO NO. 7 $ 299,900.00 $ 7,629,807.00 7.12% 0 730 ,.`A �u.. 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 WwpAtMenglobs eoMmc \J344\C08changwMerstatus Page 1 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9 272 8-81 2 7 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors, Inc. C.O. No. Elaht(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Uoarade Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access.Job No. SP19950003 Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Dedust) $133,279.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work Is hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. J-34-1 ITEM 1 — LOWER PLATFORMS REVISIONS AT VALVE BOXES NO. 3 AND 4 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to relocate a beam at Valve Box No. 3 and to lower a platform at Valve Box No. 4. The installed C12X12.10 member and clip angles were removed and reinstalled adjacent to the wall at Valve Box No. 3. The platform at Valve Box No. 4 was lowered to clear the concrete encased 6-inch PVC pipe on the Surge Tower wall. The exact size of the actuators and the location of the PVC pipe were not known during the design phase and were unforeseen conditions. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 22 and Advanco's letter dated March 17, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,512.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL WORK TO PLANT PALM TREE This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to plant one palm tree near Surge Tower No. 1. The work included additional excavation and trimming the tree roots to plant the tree per the contract drawings. This additional work was required due to an existing 78-Inch line that interfered with the placement of the palm tree. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 29 and Advanco's letter dated March 31, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $325.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ' 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors Inc C.O. No. Eiaht(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Uoorada Job No J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access.Job No,SP19950003 ITEM 3— EXTRA WORK TO SANDBLAST EXTERIOR OF SURGE TOWER NO. 2 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to sandblast the exterior of Surge Tower No. 2. A hole was created during the sandblasting operations of Surge Tower No. 2's steel shell. The hole caused a minor leak and the surface effected by the leak had to be re-sandblasted. Also included is the costs for repairing the hole. The condition of the steel shell was not known during the design phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Advanco's letter dated May 5, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,380.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—ADDITIONAL FOOTAGE OF ELECTRICAL DUCT BANKS This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary for constructing an additional length of electrical duct banks. The duct banks had to be realigned because there was not enough space for the duct bank penetration into the basement of Power Distribution Center"D" at the location shown on the drawings. The realignment resulted in an increased length of the duct bank. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 32 and Advanco's Letter Dated November 17, 1997). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,856.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—ADDITIONAL GUARD POST This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install a guard post in front of the bubbler panel at Surge Tower No. 2. The guard post will prevent the bubbler panel from being hit by moving vehicles. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 28 and Advanco's letter dated March 30, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $553.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Dale: Februarv24. 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No.J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements.Job No.P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 6—VENT PIPE SUPPORT AT SURGE TOWER NO. 2 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install a pipe support to the 14-inch vent pipe at Surge Tower No. 2. The contract drawings required that the existing support be removed during construction and reinstalled after the construction was complete. During construction it was discovered that the vent support would interfere with the new access ladders at Valve Boxes 3 and 4 and would not provide adequate headroom for stairway traffic. Therefore the existing vent was raised four feet and a new support system consisting of two columns and a beam was installed to eliminate this problem. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 27 and Advanco' s letter dated March 16, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,895.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—REROUTE BRANCH CIRCUITS FROM MCC-RASE-4 LIGHTING PANEL TO RASE-1 LIGHTING PANEL This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to reroute branch circuits from MCC RASE-4 lighting panel to RASE-1 lighting panel. This rerouting was necessary because no circuits were available in the existing lighting panel (MCC-RASE-4). Circuits were available at MCC-RASE-4 during the design phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 24 and Advanco' s letter dated March 30, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,651.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—ADDITIONAL HANDRAIL AT TOP OF SURGE TOWER NO. 2 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to install handrail on the top of Surge Tower No. 2. The additional four feet of handrail is a safety requirement and provides closure to the handrail installation on the top of Surge Tower No. 2. The contract documents did not reflect this portion of the work. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 31 and Advanco' s letter dated May 6, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $889.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advance Constructors. Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements,Job No P2-35-5 Conveyor Belt Access.Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 9—PRESSURE GROUT 120-INCH PIPE JOINT AT SURGE TOWER NO. 1 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to inject grout into the space between the weld ring and the bell ring of the 120-inch pipe at Surge Tower No. 1. Pressure grout had to be used because concrete would not penetrate into the 2-inch space between the weld ring and the bell rings of the 120-inch pipe. This work was not included in the contract documents. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Advance's letter dated September 22, 1997). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.882.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—DELETE PAINT WORK FOR SURGE TOWER NO. 2 INTERIOR This is a credit item for deleting painting work inside Surge Tower No. 2. Preliminary survey identified areas of corrosion at the lower interior of the steel shell. The design engineer, Carollo Engineers recommended that additional corrosion testing and survey of the steel shell was required before the inside surface could be painted. This work will be performed on a different project. This credit amount was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change No. 34 and Advanco's letter dated July 17, 1998). CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,900.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 —CREDIT FOR INSTALLING CLASS"B" INSTEAD OF CLASS "D" FLANGES This is a credit item for installing Class B flanges in lieu of Class D flanges. Class D flanges are thicker than Class 8 flanges. The contract documents required that the Contractor install Class D flanges for all pipe. Since Class B flanges were adequate for this job, the District approved the use of Class B flanges. This credit amount was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Advance's letter dated February 18, 1998). CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($2,535.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrade.Job No J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and SecurRy Imorovements.Job No.P2-35-5 Conveyor Bell Access.Job No.SPI9950003 ITEM 12 — 120-INCH PIPE TEST This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to pressure test the 120-inch pipe at Valve Box No. 1. This test was necessary to ensure that the 120-inch valve at Valve Box No. 1 would not leak during the hydrotesting of Surge Tower No. land was not included in the contract. Leakage past the valves could result in violation of the District's discharge permit. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 33 and Advanco's letter dated May 12, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $475.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13—CONTROL WIRES FOR SURGE TOWER BUBBLER PANELS This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to connect the control wires from the bubbler panels at Surge Towers 1 and 2 to data concentrators. The control wires from Valves No. 1 to 6 were terminated using terminal strips. Control wire from the bubbler panel at Surge Tower No. 2 was connected to the control wire at the existing junction box. Control wire from the bubbler panel at Surge Tower No. 1 was connected to Data Concentrator No. 2. The details of these connections were not shown on the contract drawings because information regarding the data concentrators was not available during the design phase. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference RFI No. 74 and Field Change Order No. 27) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14—SITE GRADING AT PLANT 2 This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to grade the north area of Plant No. 2. During last winters El Nino Storms, Plant No. 2 experienced periods when stormwater runoff from the plant site flowed to Brookhurst Street. Although only stormwater carrying sediment and no sewage was discharged, it created a public relations problem. Additionally, a stormwater management plan is required by our new NPDES Permit that will establish best management practices for the District to retain and treat stormwater runoff on-site. To accomplish this, grading was done at the north and of the plant site and two stormwater retention basins were be constructed to prevent stormwater runoff form leaving the site. The basins allow Operations to more effectively manage the peak flows needing treatment that are associated with in-plant storm runoff. Page 6 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24. 1999 Job: Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrade,Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Secur'M Improvements,Job No. P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 14 - (Continued) As directed by the PDC committee in November 1998, the work was constructed as a change order to this contract in an effort to complete the work before the anticipated rains. A project was designed and bids were solicited from contractors that are currently working for the District. Advanco Constructors provided the low bid of$86,968. During the excavation the District directed the contractor to increase the size of the southerly basin which resulted in an additional cost of$11,959. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 31) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $98.927.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days P2-35.5 ITEM 15 -ADDITIONAL PAVING AND LANDSCAPING WORK This work is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to: 1. Repair asphalt paving not covered by the contract documents. 2. Install additional sprinklers and other miscellaneous landscaping work not required by the contract documents. Item No. 1 was performed per Operations' request and to cover potholes around the newly paved areas. Item No. 2 was performed per General Services' request and to ensure proper irrigation in landscaped areas. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 30 and Advanco's letter dated May 12. 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,460.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 7 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors.Inc C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No J-34-1. Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements,Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 16—POTHOLE FOR 12-INCH PIPE AT SITE 5 Plan Change No. 10 included deletion of paving at Site 5 to allow construction of future facilities in the area. A catch basin was also constructed to allow for proper drainage at the south end of Site 5. This item is for additional costs to pothole, locate, and connect the 12-inch storm drainpipe to the nearest catch basin. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 10 and Advanco's letter dated February 6, 1998). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,709.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $133,279.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 8 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors.Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No J-34-1 Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements Job No P2-35-5 Conveyor Belt Access Job Na SP19950003 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. 11 is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 9, 1997 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 8, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $_7,122,693.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 507,114.00 This Change (Add)(DedusE) $ 133,279.00 Amended Contract Price $7,763,086.00 Page 9 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors, Inc. C.O. No. Eight(8) Date: February 24, 1999 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade Job No.J-34-1.Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements,Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003 Board Authorization Date: February 24, 1999 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Sub ed by: � . � -2a-99 Corlstruction Manager Date Ap ove by: Director of En inee'ng Date Accepted by: Advanco Constructors 4o, Contra o Date R: p.da%engWB58 CONTRACTSV-W%CO8d PDC COMMITTEE M ngD0 To N.ofu, 2+98 2-2a99 AGENDA REPORT He N�os � ?e.°' Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Lu i , Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Project Manager SUBJECT: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$4,200,000, for a total budget of$10,125.000. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-38-1 were completed in January 1999. The designer for this project is Boyle Engineering Corporation. The current engineer's estimate is $8,489,633 and the original construction budget was $4,308,000. A budget increase for Contract No. 3-38-1 is required because the current budget was prepared using an older construction cost estimate not representative of the new final design. After taking into consideration many of the constructability, maintainability, traffic control and operability issues which only became known during final design, the consulting engineer produced a final construction cost estimate much higher than the original construction budget. This project had been on hold during the 1994 bankruptcy and the original budget was not updated until after the final design was complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The original construction budget for Contract No. 3-38-1 was $4.3 million. The requested construction budget for Contract No. 3-38-1 is now$8.5 million. The current engineer's estimate for construction is $8,489,633. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1998-99 Budget Collection System Improvement,Zone 3, Line F) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests an increase in the construction budget of$4.2 million for Contract No. 3-38-1. These funds will come from Revenue Zone No. 3 reserves. O:N,6lobaMpenda Draft Rap ftVDCl3 IPR 224WdN R—W a o„ Pagel ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System was constructed in the 1960s and incorporated r sewers of the Le Habra Purchase in Beach Boulevard. In the 1970s, the Beach Relief and Imperial Relief Trunk Sewers were constructed parallel to the Miller-Holder Trunk System with diversion structures to allow the two parallel trunk sewers to operate in conjunction with each other. The OCSD 1989 Master Plan identified the Miller-Holder and Beach Relief Trunk Sewer System as being in need of parallel or replacement sewers because the existing sewers were hydraulically deficient. The alignment for the project begins at the intersection of Artesia Boulevard and Rostrata Avenue and ends at a point in Beach Boulevard just north of Hillsborough. The new 39-inch trunk sewer replaces the parallel sewers and is designed to accommodate all the existing and future flows in the sewer system. One other existing parallel trunk line will remain in standby operation as a backup system with the ability to divert flows from one trunk sewer to the other. A budget increase for Contract No. 3-38-1 is required and is attributed to the following elements: • The original budget estimate was prepared during the initial stages of design and was not updated until the design was complete. • The unit cost increases for pipeline material was not factored into the cost estimate until recently. da The trunk sewer was upsized to 39-inch for total length of the project. The original budget was based on the trunk sewer sized between 30-inch to 33-inch in diameter for approximately 70 percent of the total project. • The original budget estimate did not include costs for jacked steel casing work, diversion structure modifications, by-pass pumping and flow diversion, and abandonment and removal costs. Although the costs have increased significantly, Staff has determined that this sewer project is greatly needed because of the rapid increase in development tributary to this sewer system. For the last two years, the District has experienced at least one sewer overflow during peak rainfall events resulting from capacity deficiencies. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives. 61n,globeMgenda Draft ROPQMPDC3 I AR U4W dot R—. eawse Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1998 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table BP:jam G:WglobaKAgenda Draft RepoftXPDC�3&1 AR 22499.dot GMpWMM Wap ft Rey,4kWC Ml AR nMdot Renwd. � Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED, ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE- EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE- TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ (19,000) $ 1,000 $ 20,000 $ (19,000) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 100% Design Staff $ 153.000 $ 153.000 $ 19,000 $ 172,000 $ 153,000 $ 19,000 $ 172,000 $ 151,516 88% Consultant PSA Is 300,000 $ 300,000 1 $ - $ 300.000 1 $ 171.500 1 $ 171,500 1 $ 162,922 95% Construction Contract $ 4.308.000 $ 4,308,000 $ 4.200.000 $ 8,50B4O00 $ Construction(Other) $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ $ 30,000 $ 23,000 77% Construction Staff $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 200.000 $ $ 200,000 $ 26,447 13% Contingency $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ $ 914,000 TOTAL $ 5.925.000 1 $ 5,925,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 10.125.000 $ 344,500 $ - $ 1,48B,500 $ 364,885 25% rr.wodWe�Usaa-ae-M-38-1 nu4g�anie PDC COMMITTEE Meebng Date TOBT Or Dir. 2-499 2-2499 AGENDA REPORT DC Numb I NF Orange County Sanitation Di [t /4 FROM: David Ludwin, rector of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-39, ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$109,860, for a total amount not to exceed $626,290. SUMMARY Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, recommended that a ballast survey program be implemented to monitor the condition of the ballast. The ballast is the protective blanket of rock that absorbs the force of large storm waves. The ballast protecting the 120-inch outfall was placed during construction in the early 1970s. It was recommended that the ballast be monitored every five years and, as needed, following events impacting the ballast, such as severe storms or earthquakes. Racal Pelagos, Inc., inspected and measured the ballast rock in 1996. Several large storms occurred during the El Nino winter of 1997-98. In December 1998, Racal Pelagos repeated the survey. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast appears to have moved from its original position. Carollo Engineers' project report on the structural condition of the 120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, also recommended proceeding with physical wave tank modeling tests. Proposed Addendum No. 4 is to perform these modeling tests to determine the extent of additional ballast that will be required and the optimal rock size to provide continued long-term use of the 120-inch outfall at the lowest cost. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the original PSA, subsequent addenda, and this pending Addendum No. 4. GWalobaM9enaa oun RepftWL1 W39 Aooa M4"d= Revised 16M Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: cORF—Dta.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In March 1996, Carollo Engineers entered into an agreement with the District to provide engineering services needed for the investigation and repair work for continued use and reliable performance of the District's 78-inch and 120-inch ocean outfalls, Job. No. J-39. The Scope of Work for the outfall investigation and repair work included: 1. A study and report that analyzes securing the end gate. The study includes preparation of plans and specifications to secure the end gate. 2. Documentation of the amount of solids/grit accumulation in the outfall diffuser and determination of the condition of the outfalls. 3. Preparation of detailed plans and specifications for cleaning of the outfall based on interior inspection. 4. A hydraulic analysis for both outfalls to determine flow capacity. 5. General survey and repair work needed on both outfalls. Outfall surveys were conducted by Racal Pelagos, Inc. in 1996 and in 1998 (following the 1997-98 El Nino storms) as part of the J-39 studies to determine the condition of the ballast. The surveys indicated that some of the ballast appears to have moved from its original position. Natural shifting of the ballast pile due to large storm waves during the 1980s and 1990s may have caused this movement. Although some movement was observed, the ballast system did not appear to be in danger of immediate failure. Recent Work Efforts In February 1998, Carollo Engineers submitted a report on the structural condition of the 120-inch outfall and the repair of the 78-inch outfall (Job. No. J-39). Carollo Engineers analyzed the condition of the 120-inch ouffall and provided recommendations for additional testing and repairs. The following c.11.a ..d.D,an .1.121.aec a.,,..a 11.5 Page 2 recommendations were offered by Carollo Engineers (recommendations in bold were earmarked to be completed this fiscal year and were included in the 1998-99 CORF Budget): 1. Replace the temporary closure system at the 120-inch outfall end gate with a permanent device of suitable metal within 12 months. (Completed Sept '98 at a total cost of$101,147). 2. Replace the thrust restraint tie located at the 120-inch outfall end gate structure's offshore side. (Completed Sept '98. Cost included with Item 1 above). 3. Implement a ballast survey program to periodically monitor the condition of the ballast. Monitoring should be performed every five years and as needed following events impacting the ballast such as severe storms or earthquakes. (Completed Dec '98 at a total cost of $32,120). 4. Perform physical wave tank modeling tests to determine optimal size gradation and extent for additional ballast to reinforce the existing 120-inch ouffall ballast system. (Proposed March '99 at a total cost of $109,860). 5. Perform additional corrosion verification and testing on manhole covers within 10 years. Replace covers as needed in the future prior to the exceedance of the 1-inch corrosion allowance. 6. Re-rock the sections of the 120-inch outfall where additional reinforcing ballast is required. 7. Repair scour pad at the 120-inch outfall end gate structure. 8. Perform hydraulic testing of the 78-inch outfall. Additional Work Effort Recommended— Addendum No. 4 Preliminary results from the analysis conducted in the February 1998 engineering report indicate that almost one mile of the 120-inch outfall would benefit from additional reinforcing ballast. Initial cost estimates to reinforce the outfall from Station 27+00 to 70+00 (the stretch of outfall that experiences the most intensive wave forces) approach $13,000,000. The analysis is considered a theoretical starting point that needs to be verified by physical laboratory testing. Staff recommends proceeding with Recommendation 4, as described above, so the work can be completed by June 30, 1999, The wave tank model will determine the optimal size and extent of additional rock that may be necessary to reinforce the existing ballast system (Recommendation 6). c DMI RePoRWWL -M.39 RDN 22493 dx R—x 1. Page 3 I Carollo Engineers and their subconsultant, Dr. Fred Raichlen of Cal Tech, have worked with Oregon State University (OSU) to establish a program and schedule for wave tank testing at their Corvallis, Oregon location lest facility. Carollo proposes to provide the services of Dr. Fred Raichlen for the planning, coordination, observations, and results evaluation of the wave tank ballast testing at OSU. Carollo will provide the services of Dr. Charles Sollitt his staff, and the use of the testing facilities at OSU. Based on the results of the wave tank testing, Carollo will survey existing local rock quarries to factor in an optimum gradation solution. Carollo will also review the results of the 1998 ballast cross section inspection, prior to submitting the final report, which will indicate the most effective and economical protection for the outfall. Basis of Recommendation 1. The new Strategic Plan places special emphasis on making use of the existing 120-inch outfall. All disposal alternatives developed in the District's 1998 Draft Strategic Plan rely on the 120-inch outfall as the primary means to discharge wastewater flows through 2020, 2. Many other neighboring ocean outfalls have experienced movement of the protective rock as a result of wave activity over the past several decades. Mitigation efforts are shown in the table below. AGENCY t OUTFALL" `DESCRIPTION Encina WPCA Re-rocked mid-depth area 1992 Carlsbad City of Oceanside Re-rocked, 8,000 ft, mid-depth 1993 San Elijo Joint Powers Re-rocked (three projects) 1992 LA County Sanitation Rocked deep water section 1997 Districts 3. The analysis provided in the February 1998 engineering report suggests that almost one mile of the outfall needs to be reinforced with larger sized rocks. Actual physical tests will refine the appropriate size of the work required and identify the reach of outfall that needs the support. The final refined estimate may be reduced approximately 10-30% ($1,000,000 - $4,000,000), should the actual physical test results indicate the need of placing smaller sized rock and/or less rock around the outfall. D WplobefNgenda Draft RepoaWDL 39V36 ADw 224Hdk[ R—. Iaree Page 4 ALTERNATIVES • Option 1 — No further action This alternative involves halting any further studies regarding the protective ballast armor, disregarding the analysis conducted in the engineering report that indicates the need for additional ballast, and relying on the original design and current condition of the 120-inch outfall to continue to protect the ouffall from wave forces well into the future. Although this option is the least expensive, it is also the most risky approach. Option 2— Use existing analysis to re-rock the 120-inch ouffall This alternative involves halting any further studies (ie., wave tank modeling), and adopting the recommendation to re-rock the section of the 120-inch ouffall identified in the engineering report. This approach is more responsive than alternative 1, and would provide additional protection to the 120-inch outfall. However, it is not deemed to be the most cost-effective approach. • Option 3— Proceed with Wave Tank Modeling to further investigate the need to re-rock the 120-inch ouffall (recommended) This alternative involves conducting physical wave tank modeling to better define the need for additional rock. The testing will examine the unique design of protecting the outfall by placing additional ballast over the existing armament system, and will determine the most effective and economical protection for the outfall by limiting projected wave damage in the future. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 2. Budget Information Table 3. Proposal letter from Carollo Engineers dated November 19, 1998 CJH:jam G:\ntglob Mgenda Dmft RepohaWDCu-39U-39 ADD422499.dw c ws�s+�W maa Dort aawusocuavi.>s noon Hass e: Ravee. „sa, Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Investigation & Repair - Ocean Outfalls JOB NO. J-39 ORIGINAL e. CURRENT -PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS •- THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED -PROJECTrrASK 'AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED - AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL.: EXPENDITURE EXPENDED -. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE - BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Staff $ 210,000 $ 345,000 $ 345.000 $ 346.000 $ 345.000 $ 162,000 47% Consultant PSA $ 968,000 $ 740,653 $ 740,653 $ 516,430 $ 109.860 $ 626,290 $ 565,000 90% Construction Contract (Dive Services/Repairs) $ - $ 288,947 $ 288.947 $ 163,915 $ 163,915 $ 132,000 81% Construction Staff $ 47.500 $ 65.000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 0% TOTAL $ 1,225,500 $ 1,439.600 $ 1,439,600 It 1.090,345 $ 109,860 $ 1,200,205 $ 859.000 72% H WmAlaWr4y mMumWe -390-39b d-Ibi 22499 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-39 Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls Total Project Budget: $1,439,600 Consultant: Carollo Engineers, inc. Start Date of Project: March 1996 Data Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 327/96 Original Investigation and minor repair to ocean outfalls $433,250 $433,260 PSA 10122/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-Inch outfall $38,310 $471,570 4/06/98 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgate repair $23,090 $494,660 8/01/98 3 Provide assistance during bid 8 construction of endgate repair $21,770 $516,430 Pending 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling) needed to refine $109,860 $626,290 recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120- Inch ocean outfall H9 r.tlla%angUOBS a CONTRACTSU-39U-39 PSA status report 22499 Eoc DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, February 10, 1999, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 10, 1999 at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Ryal Wheeler, Foreman Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Shawn Boyd STAFF PRESENT: John M. Gullixson Shirley McCracken Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Mike Pelennan, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Directors Absent: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jan Debay, Board Chair Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Mark A. Murphy Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Todd Spitzer Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Mike White, Controller Larry Kraemer, O&M Engineer Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. OC SO • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 February 10, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with Directors Boyd and McCracken abstaining, to approve the minutes of the December 9, 1998 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chairman Saltarelli welcomed new Directors Shirley McCracken and Shawn Boyd to the Committee. The Chair then recognized Director Mark Leyes as the Committee's new Vice Chair. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported to the Committee the need to add two items requiring immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda: A) Compensate the Kern County, Wheeler Ridge property owner for a second month's payment of$10,400, and; B) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance technical assistance to complete embedded systems assessment, reparation, and testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999. Mr. McIntyre reported that the emergency items could be added to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two- thirds' vote of the Committee. It was moved, seconded, and unanimously carried to add two items to the Agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) Mr. McIntyre advised that two reports were placed before the Committee just prior to the meeting pertaining to the respective emergency items. The Chair advised that these two items would be added to the agenda right after the Consent Calendar. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson had no report. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Mr. Streed advised that several reports were placed before the Directors just prior to the meeting. • A report by Carollo Engineers dealing with connection and user fees. The report was not mailed with the agenda package because many Directors received a copy during the user fee discussions last year, however, Mr. Streed felt the report might be useful to the Committee during the connection fee discussion this evening. Mr. Streed noted that the connection fee comparative numbers are located on Page A18 of the Carollo report. • The Treasurers Report for January was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. For the benefit of the new Directors, Mr. Streed explained that data for this report is not available at the time of the agenda mailings each month and, therefore, the report is handed out at the meeting in order to meet the end of month 30-day requirement. Since there was no FAHR Committee meeting last month, the Treasurer's Report went directly to the Board. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 February 10, 1999 • Three pages dealing with connection fee comparative data were also placed before the Committee just prior to the meeting. Mr. Streed further reported that an item on tonight's Consent Calendar deals with General Manager's purchases over$50,000, and is the second time the Committee has considered this item. Staff is in the process of rewriting the Purchasing Authority and Resolution that may eliminate the Committee's requirement of a report every quarter on these purchases. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources Mike Pelernan advised that there would be a short closed session on the Supervisor and Professional Management Team labor negotiations and arbitration tonight. Mr. Peterrnan reported to the Committee the results of the Human Resources Survey. He advised that normally the results are only reported in an article in The Pipeline, the District's newsletter, however, since this year's results were particularly negative in the areas of confidentiality, productivity and communications, he felt a report would be appropriate. Mr. Peternan explained the survey process, the survey results, obvious reasons for this year's low ratings, and he offered suggestions on how to improve ratings in the future. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • The Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman reported that Dave Parrish, a reporter from The Reaister, has contacted the District requesting information on the status of Mr. Ray Littrell's efforts concerning the District's user fees. Mr. Parrish is aware that Mr. Littrell has been to the Grand Jury and that the Grand Jury has visited the District. Staff is providing Mr. Parrish with a copy of a letter the Grand Jury sent to the District which states we are doing a good job; a copy of a letter General Manager Don McIntyre sent to Sheldon Singer, who is the Grand Jury Foreman; and a copy of a Request for Proposals that the Finance Department sent out requesting proposals for a company or individual to look at government- owned parcels relating to sewer service rates. The responses to the RFP are due in next Thursday. Michelle reviewed Mr. Littrell's general complaint for the Committee and Mr. Littrell's contacts with the District, news media and Grand Jury. • Staff has just completed work on redesigning and updating the District's wastewater brochure which is being used in our information packets. • The cities of Westminster, Costa Mesa, Seal Beach, and Midway City will all be airing the District's new video on Cable TV. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported to the Committee good news pertaining to an accident that occurred at the District in 1994 involving employees of a contractor, Pascal and Ludwig, who were installing a gate in our channel. Mr. Woodruff described the accident and the injuries to the Pascal and Ludwig employees. He advised that four citations were issued to the District by CAL-OSHA as a result of their investigation. Mr. Woodruff described the District's alleged Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting r Page 4 February 10, 1999 violations concerning this incident, which the District appealed. Mr. Woodruff advised that his office has just received a decision from the appeals judge dismissing all four citations. He stated that the court's decision will set an excellent precedent, because it relieves the District from being responsible for contractors' employees. Mr. Woodruff further advised that CAL-OSHA's regulations are expected to be rewritten. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Operations and Maintenance Director Bob Ooten reported that one of the District's large anaerobic digesters, holding two million gallons of liquid, is leaking around a pipe. He explained that the packing gave way causing the liquid to run out onto the ground, into a drain, and into our headworks. Staff is diluting the liquid, and the tank Is being drained. Mr. Dolan advised that it would take twenty-four hours to drain the tank. Once the tank is drained, a contractor will be brought in for repairs. Mr. Oolen explained that incidents such as these occur once every couple of years, reassuring the Committee that it is safe and under control. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- E) A. FAHR99-01: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1999: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. B. FAHR98-02: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report, C. FAHR98-03: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of January 20, 1999. D. FAHR98-04: Receive and file report of General Manager-approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000. E. FAHR96-05: Receive and file Ouarterty Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. F. FAHR98-06: Renew boiler& machinery insurance for the District for the period March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000, with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $71,286. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. There were none. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A) through 12(F) under Consent Calendar. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 February 10, 1999 It 2.1) EMERGENCY ACTION ITEMS (Items A- B) A. Compensate the Kern County, Wheeler Ridge Property Owner for a Second Month's Payment Of$10,400. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried, with one opposition, to approve staffs recommendation to pay a second month additional payment of$10,400. B. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance Technical Assistance to Complete Embedded Systems Assessment, Reparation, and Testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- E) A. FAHR99-07: Authorize staff to retain Moreland &Associates to conduct the independent audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional three-year period, and to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed $42,600 for the first year with provision for 4% annual escalations for years two and three. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation with the following changes: Propose to extend the contract for an additional one-year period (1998-99), and to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed $42,600. Proposals for five-year audit services will be solicited during 1999-2000. The Committee directed staff to bring this item back to Committee next month if Moreland & Associates rejects the District's proposal. B. FAHR99-08: Authorize staff to give Danny Evangelista an 11.7% equity adjustment to correct the internal and external inequities that exist between Mr. Evangelista's salary and the salaries of other Programmers. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. C. FAHR99-09: The General Manager recommends development of a new comprehensive connection fee program and ordinance which contains the following elements: 1. Base fees are determined by type of development, flow, BOD and SS, and are calculated per 1,000 square feet for non-residential development and per unit for residential development; 2. Residential fees are tiered based upon number of bedrooms and SFR or MFR development; 3. Connection fees continue to be collected at the time the building permit is issued; Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 February 10, 1999 4. Credit for demolished structures be granted only when the developer can prove that prior connection fees were paid, and credit provided only for the amount actually paid; 5. The new connection fee program should be reported to the RAC prior to final consideration by the Board. After considerable discussion on this item, the Committee determined that a FAHR Committee Workshop should be held, with invitations to the full Board in order for all Board members to become familiar with the connection fee issues. After the Workshop, this item will be sent to the RAC Committee, then back to the FAHR Committee, and then to the Board with a recommendation. A decision as to the date and time of the Workshop will be determined at a later date. D. FAHR99-10: Review, approve and forward the Mid-Year Report for the Quarter ended December 31, 1998, to the Board of Directors. In response to Director Swan's questions, Mr. Streed advised he would provide additional information at the next Committee meeting. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. E. FAHR99-11: Approve the 1999-2000 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar, and direct staff to prepare the 1999-2000 Budget incorporating these parameters. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation with modifications to the Budget Assumptions on pages 1 and 2, as delineated by Director Swan. (14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION There were none. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Director Peer Swan requested that items such as the District's Investment Policy and strategy, the Financing Policy, what debt we have outstanding and what is planned for the future, as well as the five-year staff reduction program, be agendized for a future meeting for the benefit of the Committee's new Directors. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 7 February 10, 1999 (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for March 10, 1999 at 5,00 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:55 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item 19 (A)(1). At 8:10 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:12 p.m. Submitted by: Ij erora Crane FAHR Committee Secretary tnwo.anr vrmv.rekaxK.rwovenaaomv.ecc FAHIR COMMITTEE Meen_g`Sae TOXads. 02/10/99 02/24/99 AGENDA REPORT Iem (a) roemNum 2 e) /T Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY1999 (FAHR99-01) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1999. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) .I" ac R," MW - Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of January 1999 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months, The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts January 31, 1999 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 21,73E739 5.5 Union Bank Checking Account 42,911 3.7 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement -0- — PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18,473,625 5.0 PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 301,239,709 4.2 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,331 5.3 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,197,021 6.0 Petry Cash 4,400 TOTAL $373,695,736 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None, ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SK:Ic \4atlonWatlMq.EpNnVtpc,aneVAHRFa�MPFeEFAHRWpt Oo[ Rm . 1N17.7 Page 2 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII \\ IIIIIII\ nnw\ ..... ..... ,.... ..... ..... ..... ,.... ,.... :❖1 - ❖:❖:': :❖: ❖:':8 ':❖:❖: MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for(he month ending 31 January 1999) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PP���� $18476,617 Mellonno $18:473,625 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18494,063 Mellon $18:494,050 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.41 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $76,562 (0.41%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 45% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return (%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.40 0.37 3 Months: 1.23 1.11 12 Months: 5.56 4.98 Year-to-Date: 0.40 0.37 N1.IFINANCE17101KOZAKLSAMPLELIQ0199.VT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 January 1999) Long-Term Operating Monies (103) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current PMarket Value Estimate: $301,809,245 Mello $301,239,709 Historical Cost: PIMCO $300,077,956 Mellon $299,856,848 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.34 Of Index: 2.31 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gainlloss)of 1%Change: $7,161,841 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.53 0.51 3 Months: 1.00 0.70 12 Months: 7.45 6.93 Year-to-Date: 0.53 0.51 H. WINANCEQIOIKOZIK[SAMPLELIDI 99.RPT OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-JAN-1999 HB1300 8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 1,977,841.00 1,977,841.00 10.59% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 1,089,412.50 1,089,412.50 5.83% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS INN 1YR 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 19.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 1,378,440.00 1,378,440.00 7.38% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 141,014.24 141,014.24 0.76% 0.00 6,369.25 4.52 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 8,140,934.74 8,140,934.74 43.60% 0.00 6,369.25 0.08 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,315,477.00 17.76% -9,788.63 210,375.00 6.35 U.S. AGENCIES 3,699,104.60 3,693,636.00 19.78% -5,468.60 178,895.00 4.84 BANKING 6 FINANCE 1,953,792.00 1,951,342.00 30.45% -2,450.00 164,750.00 8.44 INDUSTRIAL 063,753.00 861,415.50 4.61% -2,337.50 60,562.50 7.03 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 511,200.00 510,820.00 2.74% -380.00 40,000.00 7.83 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 20,353,115.23 10,332,690.50 55.34% -20,424.73 654,582.50 6.34 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 198,836.46 198,836.46 1.06% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 198,836.46 198,836.46 1.06% 0.00 0.00 0.00 .. ....___�.»....... .................. ........ ................. ................ ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,692,886.43 18,672,461.70 100.00% -20,424.73 660,951.75 3.54 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-JAN-1999 HB1100 8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 595,104.20 595,1D4.20 0.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 18,801,398.82 18,801,398.B2 6.15% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -37,801, 145.32 -37,801,145.32 -12.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 8,741,464.67 8,741,464.67 2.66% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -9,663, 177.63 -9,663,177.63 -3.16% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 121,957,301.86 123,110,049.94 40.25, 1,152,748.08 7,683,195.54 6.24 U.S. AGENCIES 53,410,845.06 54,024,395.96 17.66% 613,550.90 3,314,894.86 6.14 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,800,312.50 16,793,182.50 5.49% -7,130.00 1,057,500.00 6.30 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,490,977.60 5,471,573.02 1.791 -19,404.58 372,921.05 6.82 FHLMC POOLS 14,279,008.92 14,150,014.55 4.63% -128,994.37 984,153.23 6.96 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,084,918.63 7,209,178.58 2.36% 124,259.95 446,776.50 6.20 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 228,990.55 230,147.95 0.08% 1,157.40 14,197.41 6.17 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,332,878.61 4,359,469.26 1.43% 26,590.65 250,487.38 5.75 BANKING 6 FINANCE 66,473,017.70 66,421,901.82 21.72% -51,115.88 3,956,928.69 5.96 INDUSTRIAL 11,964,519.00 11,407,223.10 3.73% -557,295.90 963,627.00 8.45 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,725,750.00 2.53% 228,495.00 450,000.00 5.82 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 309,520,025.43 310,902,886.68 101.66% 1,382,861.25 19,494,681.66 6.27 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,598,767.09 4,598,767.09 1.50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------""--- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,598,767.09 4,598,767.09 1.50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 09,9a NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3 55 619 89 305,838,476.14 100.00% 1,382,861.25 19,494,681.66 6.37 Page 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 MSF07512102 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RIM TIME : 11.25.18 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL CASH R CASK EQUIVALENTS 141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT .000 4.517 AAA 100,008 142,014.24 1.73 996085247 141,014.24 .76 900,000.00 FORD KID CA CO DISC 4.8S4 .000 P-1 98.885 889,962.00 10.93 34539URM6 04/21/1999 889,962.00 4.82 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.944 .000 P-1 98.873 889,857.00 10.15 OMISR78 04/07/1999 $89,857.00 4.82 1,100,000.00 FED MORE LN MG CORP DISC 4.998 .000 P-1 99.037 1,089,412.50 13.38 313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 1,089,412.50 5.90 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 5.027 .000 P-1 98.460 1,378,440.00 16.93 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 1,378,440.00 7.46 5,600,000.00 FEDERAL IWTL MTG ASSN DISC 5.095 .000 P-1 98.729 3,554,227.00 43.65 313588RM6 MAT 02/05/1999 3,554,227.00 19.24 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.212 .000 P-1 99.011 198,022.00 2.43 36959JP23 OUO2/1999 198,022.00 1.07 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASK EQUIVALENTS 4.802 .168 8,140,934.74 100.00 8,140,934.74 44.07 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BK CONS BDS 4.860 4.843 AAA 99.828 3,699,104.60 35.74 3133M7EN2 4.8352 01/28/2000 DO 01/28/99 3,693,636.00 19.99 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST R REF MTG 5.001 7.831 AA3 102.164 511,200.00 4.94 2643990B9 6.000% 11/01/1999 GO 11/01/% 5101820.00 2.77 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 5.119 12.557 A2 105.515 529,010.00 5.10 171205AT4 13.2502 10/15/1999 527,575.00 2.86 850,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 5.258 7.031 A2 101.343 663,753.00 8.33 71eIS4BX4 7.1257. 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 861,415.50 4.66 900,000.00 GENERAL M7RS ACCEP CORP HIM 5.305 6.185 A2 101.048 909,657.00 8.00 37042MM2 6.2502 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 909,432.00 4.92 YLDANAL YIELD AMLYSIS PAGE 2 MSF07SI1102 1999/O1/31 RUN DATE O2/OS/99 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION 800K YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL 3,300,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.345 AAA 100.469 3.325.265.63 32.08 912827K72 06.37SX 05/15/1999 DO OS/15/96 3,315,477.00 17.95 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN NTN 0S000110 5.653 8.214 A3 102.867 515,125.00 4.97 89UOKEPI 8.450% 011IV2000 DO 01/12/95 514:355.00 2.78 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 5.059 6.011 10,353,115.23 100.00 10,332,690.50 55.93 TOTAL 4.963 3.837 18,494,049.97 100.00 18,473,625.24 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUM DATE 02/05/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.25.18 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 4.801 .000 P-1 99.154 1,983,075.56 22.68 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 1,983,075.56 .62 5,900,000.00 FORD "TR CR CO DISC 4.834 .000 P-1 99.307 3.872,960.00 44.30 34539UQKI 03/19/1999 31872,960.00 1.21 2,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 4.913 .000 P-2 99.498 2,885,429.11 33.00 02680KQSO 03/05/1999 2,895,429.11 .90 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.836 .000 8,741,464.67 100.00 8,741,464.67 2.73 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.937 A2 97.606 1,992,800.00 .62 066365DH4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 119521120.00 .61 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MIN .000 5.032 A2 99.562 3,498,635.00 1.12 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 OD 04/08/98 3,484,670.00 1.09 2,000,000.00 FORD "TR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.363 Al 19.765 1,998,613.60 .ba 345397SC8 FLTG RT 08/27/2006 00 08/27/98 1,995,300.00 .62 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTH TR 8 00177 .000 4.365 Al 99.890 6,999,748.00 2.28 345402HJ3 VAR/RT OV30/1999 DD 03/30/94 7,092,190.00 2.22 5,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS .000 5.551 A2 99.199 3,918,768.50 1.26 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 3,918,360.50 1.23 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR HT .000 6.192 A3 99.931 2,999,310.00 .96 423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 00 04/27/% 2,997,930.00 .94 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTH .000 5.910 A3 99.953 4,000,000.00 1.28 42333HJH3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 OD 04/07/98 31998,120.00 1.25 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .900 5.999 AZ 99.140 4,000,000.00 1.27 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 3,965,600.00 1.24 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTH SR 800570 .ODO 5.782 A2 99.344 999,188.90 .31 44181KZ74 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DD 09/04/98 993,440.00 .31 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ _---___.__ 7,000,004.00 MORGAN ST DEAN HITTER SR NOTES .000 5.692 U3 99.875 71003,710.00 2.24 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 61991,250.00 2.19 4,302,697.56 STUDENT LN WIG ASSN 1997-1 Al .000 5.746 AAA 99.476 4,332,076.61 1.40 76442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 4,359.469.26 1.36 7,166,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.699 3.631 AU 99.844 711"1900.19 2.30 9128273AS 3.625X 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,156,887.81 2.24 10,351,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.729 3.472 AAA 97.219 10,072,010.47 3.23 9128272M3 3.375X 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 10,063,333.13 3.15 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 5.980 AAA 304.516 9,034,223.67 2.85 912827206 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,883,860.00 2.78 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSM MTN 4.943 6.369 AU 104.719 20,012,510.00 6.39 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 05/27/97 19,896,610.00 6.22 5,000.000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 8.829 AU 126.000 6,233,593.75 2.02 912810DE5 11.125X OB/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,300,000.00 1.97 51,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.2% 6.113 AAA 104.281 52,509,817.31 10.56 912827Z54 06.3757. 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 32,848,515.00 10.28 17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 6.965 AAA 107.375 18,388,684.02 5.90 912827025 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 18,361,125.00 5.74 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.553 5.%2 AAA 105.187 2,566,119.75 .84 9128273G5 06.2507. 08/31/Z002 DO 09/02/97 21629,675.00 .82 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.112 AAA 130.328 6,698,250.00 2.17 9228100G0 11.875X 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,777.056.00 2.12 1,500,000.90 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.308 AA3 103.049 1,343,225.00 .49 046003WS 6.SOOZ 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,545,735.00 .48 1,OOO,DDO.00 HELLER FINANCIAL MC NTS 5.760 5.772 A3 99.627 999,730.00 .32 42333MJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 996,270.00 .31 16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.149 AAA 105.703 16,581,D67.03 5.47 9128272N1 06.SOOX 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 17,0181163.OD 5.32 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.252 AU 105.969 3,613,203.15 1.19 912827250 06.625X 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 3,709,915.00 1.16 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 5 OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/OS/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 11.25.18 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY HARKET TOTAL COST/ I TYPE SECURITY TO SEMITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE I TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _-________ 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MUM 5.804 6.546 A2 163.062 2,060,739.00 .66 8124000N6 6.5402 OV2012003 OD 02/20/97 21066,393.10 .65 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.974 MA 104.625 5,086,402.25 1.68 9128272L5 06.2507. 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 5,231,250.00 1.64 14,750,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSH MTN 5.882 5.6% AAA 100.250 14,560,462.50 4.75 31364GLD9 5.7107. 12/15/2008 DO 12/15/98 14,786,875.00 4.63 6,000,000.00 NATIONSSAMK CHARLOTTE N C MTH 5.882 5.830 AA1 100.343 519961400.00 1.93 63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6.020,580.00 1.88 1,074,554.60 FHLMC MULTICL MG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.889 100.187 1,073,023.53 .34 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 1,076,543.98 .34 1,571,770.90 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 5.957 5.888 AAA 100.207 11568,516.85 .50 161614AEZ 5.900I 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/95 1,575,OM.47 .49 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO MR GNMA I SF MG 5.993 6.438 AAA 100.969 10,605,000.00 3.4D 01N062631 6.SOOY. 03/15/2028 10,601,745.00 3.32 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.258 AA3 101.997 215261725.00 .82 59018SXM 6.575% 10/01/2001 DO 1D/03/97 2,549,925.00 - .80 7,50D,000.00 SELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.825 AAA 103.010 7,497,255.00 2.48 079867AKS 6.000% 06/15/2002 OD 06/15/98 7,725,750.00 2.42 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HTS 6.032 6.870 A2 303.711 11283,862.50 .41 370425QF0 7.1257. 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/97 1,296,387.50 .41 1,000,400.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP MTN 6.046 6.533 A2 102.562 11018,520.00 .32 37042RGK1 6.7007. 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,025,620.00 .32 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO MR OMNA SF HTG 6.060 6.057 AM 99.063 6,195,312.50 1.99 OIN060635 6.000% 03/15/2029 6,191,437.50 1.94 4,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR PHMA SF MTG 6.0% 6.118 AM 100.532 4,244,617.19 1.36 11F011628 6.1507. 02/25/2029 4,252,471.88 1.33 228,990.56 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 964 CLA 6.200 6.169 AAA 100.505 228,990.55 .07 31677EAA4 6.2007. 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 230,147.95 .07 2,500,000.DO LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTH TR 00252 6.232 6.354 BAA1 100.722 2,509,175.00 .80 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 2,518,050.00 .79 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RON TIME 11.25.18 ------------ PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----_____- 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL WE ASSN MIN 6.291 6.026 AAA 103.391 4,488,705.00 1.49 31364CKV5 6.230Z 0U01/2002 OU 03/03/97 4,652,595.00 1.46 4,006,624.85 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.326 6.277 AAA 100.751 4,011,007.20 1.29 3133TCE95 6.3242 08/15/2032 4,056,714.60 1.26 2.000,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC 6.330 6.554 A2 102.996 21031,960.00 .66 073902AHI 6.7502 04/15/2003 2,059,920.00 .64 5,000,000.00 LENMAN EMS HUGS NTH 000196 6.364 6.618 BAAI 100.484 5,039,450.00 1.61 52517PJ 6.6502 12/08/2000 OD 11/08/96 5,024,200.00 1.57 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR CUTS 6.425 6.620 A2 101.967 1,317,619.35 .42 073902AN8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1,330,669.35 .42 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.203 AAA 104.796 21000,888.00 .67 3133TUPV2 6.SOOY. 09/25/2018 2,095,920.OD .66 2,247,914.31 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.566 6.227 AAA 96.349 2,091,774.37 .69 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 OD 11/01/93 2,165,844.08 .68 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL MATL WE ASSM MIN 6.577 6.409 AAA 103.375 0,012,576.00 2.65 31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,270,000.00 2.59 9,000,080.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.912 A2 103.787 9,903,780.00 3.00 718154BB2 9.25D7. CVlSI2000 9,340,830.00 2.92 14,059,331.86 FHLMC GROUP MS-0476 6.628 6.955 AAA 100.645 14.279,008.92 4.55 3128DDQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 14,150,014.55 4.43 3,000,000.00 G M A C HED TERM NTS 6.660 6.372 A2 103.018 5,227,070.00 .99 37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,090,540.00 .97 3,208,905.77 DENA II POOL 0080088H 6.705 6.7" AAA 101.625 3,279,100.60 1.04 3622SM20 6.975% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 3,261,050.49 1.02 2,175,839.65 CKMA II POOL 80080023 6.869 6.890 AAA 101.594 2,211,877.00 .71 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 2,210,522.53 .69 2,500,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOIRES 6.906 8.018 AAA 165.250 4,029,030.31 1.32 912810DA 13.2507. 05/15/2014 DO OS115184 4,131,250.00 1.29 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE T OCSF07522202 1999/01/31 RUN DATE 02/05/99 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.25.10 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION GOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- __'____' ------------ ---------- -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.155 6.034 309,520,025.45 100.00 310:902,"6.60 97.20 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.156 6.023 316,261,490.10 100.00 319,644,3S1.35 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-JAN-1999 -33.00 -33.00 0.000000 NA9123459 11 OCSF0752222 FOR 1/14/99 ----------- -33.00 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 08-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313396BHS FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313396BH5 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0/000000 313396BHS FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 29-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313396BH5 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW MAT 02/01/1999 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 04-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 04-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827Z54 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 5 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USG O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-JAN-1999 -889,857.00 -889,857.00 98.873000 02581SR78 04/07/1999 13-JAN-1999 889,857.00 889,857.00 98.873000 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-JAN-1999 -689,857.00 -889,857.00 98.873000 025SISR78 04/07/1999 13-JAN-1999 -889,857.00 0.00 98.873000 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,BOO,ODO.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 25-JAN-1999 -4,775,882.67 -4,775,882.67 99.497555 02680KQ50 03/05/1999 26-JAN-1999 4,775,882.67 4,775,882.67 99.497555 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,800,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 25-JAN-1999 -4,115,882.67 -4,775,882.67 99.497555 02680KOSO 03/05/1999 26-JAN-1999 -4,775,882.67 0.00 99.497555 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,015.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153717 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 21-JAN-1999 1,983,075.56 1,983,075.56 99.153777 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,075.56 -1,983,075.56 99.153777 19121EQS5 03/26/1999 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,075.56 0.00 99.153777 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 0.00 99.408750 FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 03-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00OODDOOD 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/SASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 -1,797,535.00 99.863055 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 05-JAN-1999 1,797,535.00 1,797,535.00 99.863055 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 -1,797,535.00 99.863055 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 05-JAN-1999 -1,797,535.00 0.00 99.863055 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 05-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 -3,872,960.00 99.306666 34539UQK1 03/19/1999 26-JAN-1999 3,872,960.00 3,872,960.00 99.306666 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 -3,872,960.00 99.306666 34539UQKI 03/19/1999 26-JAN-1999 -3,872,960.00 0.00 99.306666 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 -889,962.00 98.884667 34539URM6 04/21/1999 27-JAN-1999 889,962.00 889,962.00 98.884667 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 -889,962.00 98.884667 34539URM6 04/21/1999 27-JAN-1999 -889,962.00 0.00 98.884667 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 865.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 -865.95 1.000000 996085247 04-JAN-1999 865.95 865.95 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 865.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 -865.95 1.000000 996085247 04-JAN-1999 -865.95 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,212.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 -6,212.97 1.000000 996085247 04-JAN-1999 6,212.97 6,212.97 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,212.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 -6,212.97 1.000000 996085247 04-JAN-1999 -6,212.97 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,740,341.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 -1,740,341.01 1.000000 996085247 07-JAN-1999 1,740,341.01 1,740,341.01 1.000D00 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,740,341.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 -1,740,341.01 1.000000 996085247 07-JAN-1999 -1,740,341.01 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,143.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 -10,143.00 1.000000 996085247 13-JAN-1999 10,143.00 10,143.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,143.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 -10,143.00 1.000000 996085247 13-JAN-1999 -10,143.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,646,975.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 -1,646,975.93 1.000000 996085247 15-JAM-1999 1,646,975.93 1,646,975.93 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,646,975.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 -1,646,975.93 1.000000 996085247 15-JAN-1999 -1,646,975.93 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD D1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 52,660.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 -52,660.06 1.000000 996085247 19-JAN-1999 52,660.06 52,660.06 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 357,137.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 -357,137.13 1.000000 996085247 19-JAN-1999 357,137.13 357,137.13 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 52,660.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 -52,660.06 1.000000 996085247 19-JAN-1999 -52,660.06 0.00 1.000000 FC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000D00000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 357,137.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 -357,137.13 1.000000 996085247 19-JAN-1999 -357,137.13 0.00 1.000000 FC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 334,589.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 -334,589.76 1.000000 996085247 20-JAN-1999 334,589.76 334,589.76 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 334,509.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 -334,589.76 1.000000 996085247 20-JAN-1999 -334,589.76 0.00 1.000000 FC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,971.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 -9,971.75 1.000000 996085247 27-JAN-1999 9,971.75 9,971.75 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,971.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 -9,971.75 1.000000 996085247 27-JAN-1999 -9,971.75 0.00 1.000000 Page 5 OCSG000IOO MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000O0OODO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 -141,014.24 1.000000 996085247 29-JAN-1999 141,014.24 141,014.24 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 141,014.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 -141,014.24 1.000000 996085247 29-JAN-1999 -141,014.24 0.00 1.00OOOD PC 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 195,749.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-JAN-1999 -195,749.00 -195,749.00 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 15-JAN-1999 195,749.00 195,749.00 1.000000 B 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.632812 O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.632812 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.632812 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 0.00 98.632812 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,154,296.88 -6,154,296.88 98.468750 O1N060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,154,296.88 -6,154,296.88 98.468750 OIN060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,154,296.88 6,154,296.88 98.468750 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 -6,195,312.50 -6,195,312.50 99.125000 OIN060635 6.000% 03/15/2029 23-MAR-1999 6,195,312.50 6,195,312.50 99.125000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000 01N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 0.00 101.000000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NO 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-DEC-1998 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000 01H062615 6.5001 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-DEC-1998 6,060,000.00 61060,000.00 101.000000 01NO62615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.000000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750 01NO62623 6.5001 02/15/2028 22-FEB-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750 01NO62623 6.500% 02/15/2028 22-FEB-1999 6,058,125.00 6,058,125.00 100.968750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 100.968750 OIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 6,059,125.00 6,058,125.00 100.968750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 100.968750 O1N062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 4,543,593.75 4,543,593.75 100.968750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 -10,605,000.00 -10,605,000.00 101.000000 OIN062631 6.500% 03/15/2028 23-MAR-1999 10,605,000.00 10,605,000.00 101.000000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1990 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 11F011610 6.1501 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 0.00 100.562500 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1990 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750 IIF0I1610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,016,875.00 2,016,875.00 100.843750 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 02-DEC-1998 -2,016,875.00 -2,016,875.00 100.843750 1IF011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,016,875.00 0.00 100.843750 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -2,007,500.00 -2,007,500.00 100.375000 1IF011628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,007,500.00 2,007,500.00 100.375000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 -2,237,317.19 -2,237,317.19 100.328125 IIF0I1628 6.150% 02/25/2029 23-FEB-1999 2,237,317.19 2,237,317.19 100.328125 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.802000 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -17,298.61 -17,298.61 105.802000 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.902000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000 171205AT4 13.2501 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.602000 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 17,298.61 17,298.61 105.802000 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.802000 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -529,010.00 -529,010.00 105.802000 171205AT4 13.2504 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 529,010.00 529,010.00 105.802000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000,00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -17,298.61 -17,298.61 105.802000 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 105.802000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CO LLC 13-JAN-1999 -546,308.61 -546,308.61 105.802000 171205AT4 13.250% 10/15/1999 19-JAN-1999 -546,308.61 0.00 105.802000 FC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DD 11/02/94 22-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000 B NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -9,000.00 -9,000.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST & REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000 SC NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 9,000.00 9,000.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -511,200.00 -511,200.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 511,200.00 511,200.00 102.240000 B NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY, SAN FR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 6 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -9,000.00 -9,000.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.0001 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.240000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DUKE ENERGY CORP 1ST 4 REF MTG 19-JAN-1999 -520,200.00 -520,200.00 102.240000 264399DB9 8.000% 11/01/1999 DO 11/01/94 22-JAN-1999 -520,200.00 0.00 102.240000 PC NATIONSBANC CAPITAL MARKETS IN 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP 8GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,907.15 -171,907.15 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/202B DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 171,907.15 171,907.15 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY d CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP 4G0-0950 19-OCT-1998 -376.47 -376.47 98.937500 31293HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/9B 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 173,753.28 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -172,283.62 -172,283.62 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -172,283.62 0.00 98.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.66 -999,268.66 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 999,268.66 999,268.66 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -2,188.33 -2,188.33 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,009,999.91 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,001,456.99 -1,001,456.99 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,456.99 0.00 98.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.937500 31283HBTI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 728,510.14 72B,510.14 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -1,595.39 -1,595.39 98.937500 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP #GO-0950 19-OCT-1998 -730,105.53 -730,105.53 98.937500 312B3HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DD 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -730,105.53 0.00 9B.937500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -392,511.65 -392,511.65 99.453125 Page 11 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31293HE90 6.000% O1/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 392,511.65 392,511.65 99.453125 B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -855.12 -855.12 99.453125 31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0160 16-OCT-1998 -393,366.77 -393,366.77 99.453125 31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -393,366.77 0.00 99.453125 PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -270,758.30 -270,758.30 98.937500 31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 270,758.30 270,758.30 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -592.94 -592.94 98.937500 31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0209 19-OCT-1998 -271,351.24 -271,351.24 98.937500 31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -271,351.24 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -827,360.89 -827,360.89 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% O1/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 827,360.89 827,360.89 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -1,811.87 -1,811.87 98.937500 31293H%U2 6.000% O1/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 12 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE 'BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-199B -829,172.76 -829,172.76 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -829,172.76 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -105,457.48 -105,457.48 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 105,457.48 105,457.48 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -230.95 -230.95 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -105,690.43 -105,688.43 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -105,688.43 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY i CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -999,268.75 -999,268.75 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 999,268.75 999,268.75 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -2, 188.33 -2,1BB.33 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 19-OCT-1998 -1,001,457.08 -1,001,457.08 98.937500 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -1,001,457.08 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -592,074.29 -592,D74.29 99.453125 31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD OI/DI/99 14-JAN-1999 592,074.29 592,074.29 99.453125 B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -1,289.88 -1,289.88 99.453125 31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0860 16-OCT-1998 -593,364.17 -593,364.17 99.453125 31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -593,364.17 0.00 99.453125 FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -492,292.97 -492,292.97 99.453125 31293JCC1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 492,292.97 492,292.97 99.453125 B GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC, GREENW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -1,072.50 -1,072.50 99.453125 31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.453125 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0967 16-OCT-1998 -493,365.47 -493,365.47 99.453125 31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -493,365.47 0.00 99.453125 FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1998 -643,994.08 -643,994.08 98.937500 31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 643,994.08 643,994.00 98.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1999 -1,410.31 -1,410.31 98.937500 31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAM-1999 0.00 0.00 98.937500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-1104 19-OCT-1998 -645,404.39 -645,404.39 98.937500 31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -645,404.39 0.00 98.937500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 21-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 -3,699,104.60 99.975800 3133M7EW2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO O1/28/99 28-JAN-1999 3,699,104.60 3,699,104.60 99.975800 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 21-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 -3,699,104.60 99.975800 3133M7EW2 4.835% 01/28/2000 DO O1/28/99 28-JAN-1999 -3,699,104.60 0.00 99.975800 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -909,657.00 -909,657.00 101.073000 37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO O1/11/94 20-JAN-1999 909,657.00 909,657.00 101.073000 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -17,031.25 -17,031.25 101.073000 37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO 01/11/94 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 101.073000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 14-JAN-1999 -926,688.25 -926,688.25 1D1.073000 37042M7G2 6.250% 01/11/2000 DO O1/11/94 20-JAN-1999 -926,688.25 0.00 101.073000 FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 850,000.00 PHILLIP MORRIS CO INC NTS 31-DEC-1998 -869,641.02 -869,641.02 101.618000 718154BX4 7.125% 12/01/1999 DO 12/01/92 06-JAN-1999 -069,641.02 0.00 101.618000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 06-JAN-1999 -2,060,739.00 -2,060,739.00 102.780000 81240QGW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 2,060,739.00 2,060,739.00 102.780000 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN O6-JAN-1999 -20,397.53 -20,397.53 102.780000 81240QGWG 6.54D6 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 102.780000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 15 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN O6-JAN-1999 -2,081,136.53 -2,081, 136.53 102.780000 812400GW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 11-JAN-1999 -2,081,136.53 0.00 102.780000 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN 8SB00110 07-JAN-1999 -515,125.00 -515,125.00 103.025000 89350MEPI 8.450% 01/12/2000 DD O1/12/95 12-JAN-1999 515,125.00 515,125.00 103.025000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN 8SB00110 07-JAN-1999 -15,374.31 -15,374.31 103.025000 89350MEP1 8.450% 01/12/2000 DO O1/12/95 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 103.025000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN MTN ISBOO110 07-JAN-1999 -530,499.31 -530,499.31 103.025000 89350MEP1 8.450% 01/12/2000 DO 01/12/95 12-JAM-1999 -530,499.31 0.00 103.025000 FC MERRILL LYNCH, FIX INCOME OPER 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,652,219.02 -6,652,219.02 128.086500 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-1999 -6,652,219.02 0.00 128.086500 FC HSSC SECS INC, NEW YORK 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 -2,493,950.00 -2,493,950.00 100.562500 999ACW396 6.1508 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,493,950.00 0.00 100.562500 FC BEAR STEARNS 8 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z O1-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 -11, 12B.10 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 11,128.10 11,128.10 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Pape 16 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 -11,128.10 100.000000 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 -11,128.10 0.00 100.000000 PC 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 -11,183.54 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 11,183.54 11,183.54 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E O1-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 -11,183.54 100.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 -11,183.54 0.00 100.000000 PC 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,453.56 1,890,453.56 99.497556 02680KQ50 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 -1,890,453.56 -1,890,453.56 99.497556 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 95.00 95.00 99.497556 02680KOSO 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.497556 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 1,890,549.56 1,890,548.56 99.497556 02680K050 03/05/1999 27-JAN-1999 1,890,548.56 0.00 99.497556 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 20-JAN-1999 3,555,589.00 3,555,589.00 98.766361 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 20-JAN-1999 -3,555,589.00 -3,555,589.00 98.766361 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 28-JAN-1999 41,579.00 41,579.00 98.766361 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.766361 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 28-JAN-1999 3,597,168.00 3,597,168.00 98.766361 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 28-JAN-1999 3,597,168.00 0.00 98.766361 PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAM-1999 792,300.00 792,300.00 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 -792,300.00 -792,300.00 99.037500 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAM-1999 4,944.00 4,944.00 99.037500 3133968H5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 06-JAN-1999 797,244.00 797,244.00 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 06-JAN-1999 797,244.00 0.00 99.037500 PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 396,150.00 396,150.00 99.037500 313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 -396,150.00 -396,150.00 99.037500 S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 2,781.11 2,781.11 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-JAN-1999 398,931.11 398,931.11 99.037500 313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 12-JAN-1999 398,931.11 0.00 99.037500 PC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FED HOME IN MSG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 594,225.00 594,225.00 99.037500 313396BHS MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 -594,225.00 -594,225.00 99.037500 Page 18 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 4,743.67 4,743.67 99.037500 313396885 MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 19-JAN-1999 598,968.67 598,968.67 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 19-JAN-1999 598,968.67 0.00 99.037500 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 495,187.50 495,187.50 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 -495,187.50 -495,187.50 99.037500 S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 4, 158.33 4,158.33 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-JAN-1999 499,345.83 499,345.83 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 22-JAN-1999 499,345.83 0.00 99.037500 PC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 99,037.50 99,037.50 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 -99,037.50 -99,037.50 99.037500 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 896.25 896.25 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 27-JAN-1999 99,933.75 99,933.75 99.037500 Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 27-JAN-1999 99,933.75 0.00 99.037500 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 198,075.00 198,075.00 99.031500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 -198,075.00 -198,075.00 99.037500 S HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 1,847.50 1,847.50 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.037500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-JAN-1999 199,922.50 299,922.50 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 29-JAN-1999 199,922.50 0.00 99.037500 FC HSBC SECS INC, NEW YORK 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -298,226.25 -298,226.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 298,226.25 298,226.25 99.408750 SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -376.75 -376.75 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 -298,603.00 -298,603.00 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 -298,603.00 0.00 99.408750 FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,226.25 298,226.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 -298,226.25 -298,226.25 99.408750 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 20 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 376.75 376.75 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 298,603.00 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 0.00 99.408750 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -596,452.50 -596,452.50 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 596,452.50 596,452.50 99.408750 SC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -2,488.00 -2,488.00 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 I.DDD000DOO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 -598,940.50 -598,940.50 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 -598,940.50 0.00 99.40875D FCC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 596,452.50 596,452.50 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 -596,452.50 -596,452.50 99.408750 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 2,488.00 2,488.00 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-DEC-1998 598,940.50 598,940.50 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-DEC-1998 598,940.50 0.00 99.408750 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 03-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 1,497,945.83 1,497,945.83 99.063055 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 -1,497,945.83 -1,497,945.83 99.863055 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 454.17 454.17 99.863055 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.863055 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 07-JAN-1999 1,498,400.00 1,498,400.00 99.863055 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 07-JAN-1999 1,498,400.00 0.00 99.863055 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 497,398.06 497,398.06 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -497,398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00OOOOODD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 1,576.94 1,576.94 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.479612 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 498,975.00 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 0.00 99.479612 FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -497,398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 497,398.06 497,398.06 99.479612 SC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -1,576.94 -1,576.94 99.479612 36959JNS8 O1/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 59.479612 Isc ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.D00000000 0.00 Page 22 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 -498,975.00 -498,975.00 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -498,975.00 0.00 99.479612 FCC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 497, 398.06 497,398.06 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 -497, 398.06 -497,398.06 99.479612 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 1,576.94 1,576.94 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 99.479612 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-JAN-1999 498,975.00 499,975.00 99.479612 36959JNS8 01/26/1999 II-JAN-1999 498,975.00 0.00 99.479612 FC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -946,462.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 946,462.44 1.000000 996085247 05-JAN-1999 -946,462.44 -946,462.44 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -946,462.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 946,462.44 1.000000 996085247 05-JAN-1999 946,462.44 0.00 1.000000 PC 05-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -72,397.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O6-JAN-1999 72,397.02 72,397.02 1.000000 996085247 06-JAN-1999 -72,397.02 -72,397.02 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -72,397.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-JAN-1999 72,397.02 72,397.02 1.000000 996085247 06-JAN-1999 72,397.02 0.00 1.000000 PC O6-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 23 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 08-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 08-JAN-1999 3.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 08-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,582,161.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 1,582,161.53 1.000000 996085247 11-JAN-1999 -1,582,161.53 -1,582, 161.53 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,582,161.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 1,592,161.53 1.000000 996085247 11-JAN-1999 1,582,161.53 0.00 1.000000 FC 11-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -131,568.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 131,568.20 1.000000 996085247 12-JAN-1999 -131,568.20 -131,568.20 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -131,568.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 131,568.20 1.000000 996085247 12-JAN-1999 131,568.20 0.00 1.000000 FC 12-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -48,885.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 49,885.92 1.000000 996085247 14-JAN-1999 -48,885.92 -48,885.92 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -48,885.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 48,885.92 1/000000 996085247 14-JAN-1999 48,885.92 0.00 1.000000 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LASS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -26,691.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 26,691.25 1.000000 996085241 20-JAN-1999 -26,691.25 -26,691.25 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -26,691.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 26,691.25 2.000000 996085247 20-JAN-1999 26,691.25 0.00 1.000000 PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,983,718.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 1,983,118.73 1.000000 996085247 21-JAN-1999 -1,983,718.73 -1,983,718.73 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,983,718.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 1,983,718.73 1.000000 996085247 21-JAN-1999 1,983,718.73 0.00 1.000000 PC 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -20,954.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 20,854.17 1.000000 996095247 22-JAN-1999 -20,854.17 -20,854.17 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -20,854.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 20,854.17 1.000000 996085247 22-JAN-1999 20,854.17 0.00 1.000000 PC 22-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -464,277.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JAN-1999 464,277.65 464,277.65 1.000000 996085247 25-JAN-1999 -464,277.65 -464,277.65 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -464,277.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-JAM-1999 464,277.65 464,277.65 1.000000 Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 25-JAN-1999 464,277.65 0.00 1.000000 FC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 26-JAN-1999 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-JAN-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 26-JAN-1999 3.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -43,031.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 43,031.34 1.000000 996085247 28-JAN-1999 -43,031.34 -43,031.34 1.000000 S - ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -43,031.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 43,031.34 1.000000 996085247 28-JAN-1999 43,031.34 0.00 1.000000 PC 28-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 6,159,179.69 6,159,179.69 98.546875 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.546875 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,371.06 -5,371.06 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 11-JAN-1999 -6,159,179.69 -6,159,179.69 96.546875 O1N060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.546875 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 5,371.06 5,371.06 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,203,125.00 6,203,125.00 99.250000 OIN060627 6.000% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,154,296.89 -6,154,296.88 99.250000 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 48,828.12 48,828.12 1.000000000 0.00 Page 26 0CSG000100 MELLON TRUST _ CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 6,064,218.72 6,064,210.72 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAM-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070312 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218.72 4,218.72 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -6,064,218.72 -6,064,218.72 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,060,000.00 6,060,000.00 101.070312 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -4,218.72 -4,218.72 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,548,164.04 4,548,164.04 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.04 3,164.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 -4,548,164.04 -4,548,164.04 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.070312 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -3,164.04 -3,164.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -6,060,000.00 -6,060,000.00 101.070313 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 4,218.75 4,218.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 6,064,210.75 6,064,218.75 101.070313 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,064,218.75 0.00 101.070313 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.070312 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 3,164.06 3,164.06 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O6-JAN-1999 4,549,164.06 4,548,164.06 101.070312 OIN062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,548,164.06 0.00 101.070312 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 6,068,671.86 6,068,671.86 101.144531 01NO62623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -6,058,125.00 -6,058,125.00 101.144531 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 10,546.86 10,546.86 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 28-JAN-1999 4,551,503.90 4,551,503.90 101.144531 DIN062623 6.500% 02/15/2029 22-FEB-1999 -4,543,593.75 -4,543,593.75 101.144531 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 7,910.15 7,910.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188 11F0116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 2,012,812.50 2,012,812.50 100.867188 SC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -4,531.26 -4,531.26 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188 11F0116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 -2,017,343.76 0.00 100.867188 FCC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188 11FO116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 -2,012,812.50 -2,012,812.50 100.867188 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 4,531.25 4,531.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 02-DEC-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188 11FO116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1999 2,017,343.75 0.00 100.867188 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 29-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 06-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 2,237,839.83 100.351562 11FO11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,245,509.18 -2,245,509.18 100.351562 5 BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -7,669.35 -7,669.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 06-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 2,237,839.83 100.351562 11FO11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,237,839.83 0.00 100.351562 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM10D BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORK GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST O6-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 2,008,046.88 100.402344 11F011610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,013,909.57 -2,013,909.57 100.402344 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,862.69 -5,862.69 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST O6-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 2,008,046.88 100.402344 11FD11610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,008,046.88 0.00 100.402344 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 723,677.95 723,677.95 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO 06/01/98 14-JAN-1999 -728,510.14 -728,510.14 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- -4,832.19 -4,832.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0950 17-NOV-1998 1,595.39 1,595.39 98.281250 31283HETI 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -736,333.69 FHLMC GROUP OGO-0950 17-MOV-1998 725,273.34 725,273.34 98.281250 31283HBT1 6.000% 06/01/2028 DO O6/01/98 14-JAN-1999 725,273.34 0.00 98.281250 FC GOLDMAN SACHS c CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP YC2-0160 17-NOV-1998 397,886.61 387,886.61 98.281250 31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -392,511.65 -392,511.65 99.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY ----------- -4,625.04 -4,625.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -394,670.00 FHLMC GROUP YC2-0160 17-NOV-1998 855.12 855.12 98.281250 31293HE90 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -394,670.O0 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0160 17-NOV-1998 388,741.73 388,741.73 98.281250 31293HE9D 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 388,741.73 0.00 98.281250 Page 29 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 268,962.37 268,962.37 98.281250 31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2028 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -270,758.30 -270,758.30 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -1,795.93 -1,795.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 592.94 592.94 9B.281250 31293HGS6 6.0001 12/01/2028 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -273,666.00 FHLMC GROUP #C2-0209 17-NOV-1998 269,555.31 269,555.31 98.281250 31293HGS6 6.000% 12/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 269,555.31 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 104,757.98 104,757.98 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -105,457.48 -105,457.48 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -699.50 -699.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP AC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 230.95 230.95 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -106,590.00 FHLMC GROUP ►C2-0691 17-NOV-1998 104,988.93 104,988.93 96.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 104,988.93 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 9C2-0691 17-NOV-1998 992,640.63 992,640.63 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -999,268.75 -999,268.75 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -6,628.12 -6,628.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0691 17-NOV-1999 2,199.33 2,188.33 98.281250 Page 30 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 994,828.96 994,828.96 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 994,828.96 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 821,873.02 821,873.02 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -827,360.89 -827,360.89 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -5,487.87 -5,487.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -836,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 1,811.87 1,611.87 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -036,246.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0691 17-NOV-1998 823,684.89 823,684.89 98.281250 31293HXU2 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 823,684.99 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS i CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1998 585,097.77 505,097.77 98.281250 31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DD O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -592,074.29 -592,074.29 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -6,976.52 -6,976.52 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1990 1,289.88 1,289.88 98.281250 31293H5V1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO 01/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 90.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -595,330.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0860 17-NOV-1998 506,387.65 586,387.65 98.281250 31293H5V1 6.0001 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 586,387.65 0.00 90.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 31 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0967 17-NOV-1998 486,492.19 486,492.19 98.281250 31293JCCI 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -492,292.97 -492,292.97 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -5,800.78 -5,800.78 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-0967 17-NOV-1998 1,072.50 1,072.50 98.291250 31293JCC1 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 90.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-0967 17-NOV-1998 487,564.69 487,564.69 98.281250 31293JCC1 6.000% 02/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 487,564.69 0.00 98.281250 EC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-1104 17-NOV-1998 639,722.48 639,722.48 98.281250 31293JGMS 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 -643,994.09 -643,994.08 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- -4,271.60 -4,271.60 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP /C2-1104 17-NOV-1998 1,410.31 1,410.31 98.281250 31293JGM5 6.0001 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 98.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -650,910.00 FHLMC GROUP IC2-1104 17-NOV-1998 641,132.79 641,132.79 98.281250 31293JGM5 6.000% 01/01/2029 DO O1/01/99 14-JAN-1999 641,132.79 0.00 98.281250 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.00 FNMA POOL 00339016 17-NOV-1998 28,826.39 28,826.39 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 -28,847.87 -28,847.87 100.642369 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -21.48 -21.48 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1990 88.09 88.09 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 32 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ,CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,914.48 28,914.48 100.642369 31375MS06 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,914.48 0.00 100.642369 FC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1999 -28,826.39 -28,026.39 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,847.87 28,847.87 100.642369 SC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 21.49 21.48 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 -88.09 -88.09 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.1621 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,642.00 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 -28,914.48 -28,914.49 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 -28,914.48 0.00 100.642369 FCC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,826.39 28,826.39 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1999 -28,840.27 -28,848.27 100.642369 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -21.88 -21.88 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.40 FNMA POOL /0339016 17-NOV-1998 88.09 88.09 100.642369 31375HSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.642369 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 17-NOV-1998 28,914.48 28,914.49 100.642369 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 19-NOV-1998 28,914.48 0.00 100.642369 PC BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY 04-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,368,42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 -163,369.42 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 163,030.20 163,030.20 100.000000 Page 33 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PDC ----------- -338.22 -338.22 1.OD00D00D0 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 -163,368.42 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -163,360.42 0.00 100.000000 FCC 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,688.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 163,688.91 163,688.91 100.000000 161614AE2 5.9001 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -163,350.02 -163,350.02 100.000000 PD ----------- 338.89 338.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,668.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-DEC-1998 163,688.91 163,688.91 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-2998 163,688.91 0.00 100.000000 PC 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JAN-1999 152,906.45 152,908.45 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 -152,591.88 -152,591.80 100.000000 PD ----------- 316.57 316.57 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-JAN-1999 152,908.45 152,908.45 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 152,908.45 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 767,464.30 100.000000 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/99 01-JAN-1999 -779,455.93 -779,455.93 100.000000 PD ----------- -11,991.63 -11,991.63 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 767,464.30 100.000000 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-JAN-1999 767,464.30 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1999 65,822.98 65,822.98 100.000000 Page 34 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD , O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 -65,894.97 -65,894.97 100.000000 PD ----------- -71.99 -71.99 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-DEC-1998 65,822.98 65,822.98 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 65,822.98 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87,549.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-JAN-1999 87,549.50 87,549.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JAN-1999 -87,645.26 -87,645.26 100.000000 PD ----------- -95.76 -95.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,528.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-JAN-1999 46,528.05 46,528.05 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.9001 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 -46,462.62 -46,462.62 100.000000 PD ----------- 65.43 65.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,52B.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-JAN-1999 46,529.05 46,528.05 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 46,528.05 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,642.40 FNMA POOL 10339016 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 -28,642.40 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 28,848.27 28,848.27 100.000000 PDC ----------- 205.87 205.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,642.40 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 -28,642.40 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.162% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -28,642.40 0.00 100.000000 FCC 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 182,972.48 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.47 -182,972.47 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.01 0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 35 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 182,972.48 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 182,972.48 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIHCO 182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.48 -182,972.48 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 182,972.47 182,972.47 100.000000 PDC ----------- -0.01 -0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 182,972.48 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 -182,972.48 -162,972.48 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAM-1999 -182,972.48 0.00 100.000000 FCC 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 18,297.24 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 -18,297.24 -16,297.24 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 18,297.24 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 18,297.24 0.00 100.000000 PC 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -118,528.70 GNMA II POOL 00080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.70 118,528.70 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 -120,491.83 -120,491.83 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,963.13 -1,963.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 118,528.70 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-JAN-1999 -118,528.70 -118,528.70 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/O1/96 01-JAN-1999 120,491.83 120,491.83 100.000000 PDC ----------- 1,963.13 1,963.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -118,528.50 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 118,528.50 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 -120,491.63 -120,491.63 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,963.13 -1,063.13 1.000000000 0.00 Page 36 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -118,528.50 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 118,528.50 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 118,528.50 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -164,036.68 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-JAN-1999 164,036.60 164,036,68 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 -167,624.98 -167,624.98 100.000000 PD ----------- -3,588.30 -3,588.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -164,036.68 GNMA II POOL 4080086M O1-JAN-1999 164,036.68 164,036.68 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 164,036.68 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 311,212.64 100.000000 78442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DO 03/20/97 25-JAN-1999 -307,675.03 -307,675.03 100.000000 PD ----------- 3,537.61 3,537.61 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 311,212.64 100.000000 78442GAK2 VAR RT 10/25/2005 DD 03/20/97 25-JAN-1999 311,212.64 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH i CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 -1,292,313.75 -1,292,313.75 100.000000 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 1,292,313.75 1,292,313.75 100.000000 MTC TO REVERSE 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 -198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000 MT 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000 Page 37 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE EASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ MTC 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 198,817.50 198,817.50 100.000000 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1999 15-DEC-1998 -198,817.50 -198,817.50 100.000000 MT 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 15-JAN-1999 299,589.17 299,589.17 100.000000 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 15-JAN-1999 -299,589.17 -299,589.17 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 27-JAN-1999 786,259.78 786,259.78 100.000000 34539UNTS 01/27/1999 27-JAN-1999 -786,259.78 -786,259.78 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 26-JAN-1999 14,424,543.61 14,424,543.61 100.000000 36959JNSS 01/26/1999 26-JAN-1999 -14,424,543.61 -14,424,543.61 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GMAC DISC 20-JAN-1999 891,636.75 891,636.75 100.000000 37042ENL1 01/20/1999 20-JAN-1999 -891,636.75 -891,636.75 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 GMAC DISC 25-JAN-1999 696,464.42 696,464.42 100.000000 37042ENR8 01/25/1999 25-JAN-1999 -696,464.42 -696,464.42 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 IBM DISC 13-JAN-1999 883,021.50 883,021.50 100.000000 44922BND6 01/13/1999 13-JAN-1999 -883,021.50 -883,021.50 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR Page 38 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR HIS 15-JAN-1999 48,750.00 48,750.00 0.000000 046003HYB 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 15-JAN-1999 48,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1998 -10,081.69 -10,081.69 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -10,081.69 0.00 0.000000 ITC 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 17-DEC-1998 -10,087.69 -10,087.69 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 12/15/95 15-DEC-1998 -10,087.69 0.00 0.000000 ITC 17-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 11000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,680.91 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A O6-JAN-1999 9,284.52 9,284.52 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1998 9,284.52 0.00 0.00000D IT 06-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 152,908.45 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-JAN-1999 8,479.68 8,479.68 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-JAN-1999 8,479.68 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 20-JAN-1999 19,316,62 19,316.62 0.000000 171200ESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/99 15-JAN-1999 19,316.62 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 767,464.30 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 15-JAN-1999 86,489.64 86,489.64 0.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-JAN-1999 86,489.64 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,822.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-JAN-1999 21,812.30 21,811.30 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-DEC-1998 21,811.30 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 39 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-JAN-1999 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-JAN-1999 30,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,528.05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-JAN-1999 5,511.89 5,511.89 0.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-JAN-1999 5,511.89 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,128.10 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 07-JAN-1999 11,128.10 11,128.10 0.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-DEC-1998 11,128.10 0.00 0.000000 IT 07-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,183.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 19-JAN-1999 11,183.54 11,183.54 0.000000 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 01-JAN-1999 11,183.54 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 15-DEC-1998 1,182.50 2,182.50 0.000000 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 15-DEC-1998 1,182.50 0.00 0.000000 CD DIFF ON MATURITY 15-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 182,972.49 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1999 12,776.52 12,776.52 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 12,776.52 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,297.24 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 27-JAN-1999 1,277.66 1,277.66 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-JAN-1999 1,277.66 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 25-JAN-1999 410.83 410.83 0.000000 34539UNF5 01/15/1999 15-JAN-1999 430.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 40 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 21-JAN-1999 13,740.22 13,740.22 0.000000 34539UNT5 01/27/1999 27-JAN-1999 13,740.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 118,528.50 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-JAN-1999 13, 383.81 13,383.81 0.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1999 13, 383.81 0.00 O.D00000 IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00OD00000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 164,036.68 GNMA II POOL NOBOOBBM 20-JAN-1999 19,324.15 19,324.15 0.000000 36225CC20 6.875% O6/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-JAN-1999 19,324.15 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.00D000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 26-JAN-1999 75,456.39 75,456.39 0.000000 36959JNSO 01/26/1999 26-JAN-1999 75,456.39 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 G14AC DISC 2D-JAN-1999 8,363.25 8,363.25 0.000000 37042ENL1 01/20/1999 20-JAN-1999 8,363.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 GMAC DISC 25-JAN-1999 3,535.58 3,535.58 0.000000 37042ENRS 01/25/1999 25-JAN-1999 3,535.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 27-JAN-1999 41,854.02 41,854.02 0.000000 423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 27-JAN-1999 41,854.02 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 IBM DISC 13-JAN-1999 16,978.50 16,978.50 0.000000 44922BND6 01/13/1999 13-JAN-1999 16,978.50 0.00 0.000000 Page 41 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 13-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 311,212.64 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 1997-1 Al 25-JAN-1999 57,986.30 57,986.38 0.000000 78442GAK2 VAR AT 10/25/2005 DD 03/20/97 25-JAM-1999 57,986.38 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,700.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 -25,700.00 -25,700.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -25,700.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 25,700.00 25,700.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 31-DEC-1998 25,700.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 12/31/98 0.00 • LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,351,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 174,676.50 174,676.50 0.000000 9129272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JAN-1999 174,676.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 -17,780.00 -17,780.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 25-JUL-2998 -17,780.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1998 17,780.00 17,780.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 31-DEC-1998 17,780.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-DEC-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 12/31/98 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,168,070.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 129,921.27 129,921.27 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1999 129,921.27 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 29-JAN-1999 -259.99 -258.99 0.000000 Page 42 0 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST a CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JAN-1999 - 31-JAN-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 29-JAN-1999 -258.99 0.00 0.000000 CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 29-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 04-JAN-1999 865.95 865.95 0.000000 996095247 01-JAN-1999 865.95 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-JAN-1999 6,213.71 6,213.71 0.000000 996085247 01-JAN-1999 6,213.71 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PINCO 0.00 BSOT-LATE HONEY DEP ACCT 04-JAN-1999 5.26 5.26 0.000000 996087094 VAR AT DD 06/26/1997 01-JAN-1999 5.26 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 43 FAHR COMMITTEE rneeanoom r°e°• �io/ss y2o/sv AGENDA REPORT 1Oe,=��"` '��'f 7r Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1998 (FAHR99-05) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies,"and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) %WdonWaWl yenun°+ocnn*TAHW@h u�AN�,. R—. „� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for your reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification of the District's portfolios, as of September 30, 1998, and December 31, 1998. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries, and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a summary of the performance of the District's portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period October 1 through December 31, 1998. Portfolio Performance Surnmary Quarter Ended December 31,less Liquid Operatmg Monies(%) LOWTerm Operating Monies(%) Total Rate of Return 3 Months 1.3 0.6 6 Months 2.8 4.5 9 Months 14.2 5.4 12 Months 1 5.8 8.1 Since inception 30 Sept.95 I b.0 1.3 Benchmark 3 Months 1.1 0.5 6 Months 24 4.3 9 Months 6.0 12 Months 5.1 76 Some inception 30 Sept.95 5.2 69 Market Value per PIMCO 31 Dec.98 $1 SAM 3304.SM Average Quality *AAA' 'AM' Current Yield 5.3% 60% Estimated Yield to Maturity 50% 507% Ouarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) $20 OM Estimated Annual lrcome $1.DM $154M Market Recap During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Federal Reserve cut short-term interest rates by 50 basis points, amid concerns of slower growth in the U.S. economy. The rate cut stabilized the market, restoring liquidity and confidence, and investors shifted from Treasuries to other bond market sectors, and to stocks, which surged to record levels. \YaCmWvu1Mq m vn111V neTAHRTahgs9FebVAHRW-05 trc R. 1 v Page 2 As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve," the Treasury yield curve remained flat during the fourth quarter, but short and intermediate rates rose by approximately 10 to 30 basis points as expectations faded for further rate cuts by the Fed. The benchmark 30-year Treasury rate rose approximately 10 basis points when compared to the end of the third quarter 1998 (4.97% vs. 5.09%). For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted maturity or duration, slightly above the duration index (2.4 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing holdings in lower coupon mortgage backed securities, and high quality corporates. These investments contributed incremental yield to the portfolio when compared to the all-Treasury benchmark yields, despite market volatility. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark(0.6% vs. 0.5%) for the fourth quarter, and for the year (8.1% vs. 7.6%). For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO used a duration posture slightly below index(approximately 72 days vs. 90 days), and emphasized U.S. Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate commercial paper in the portfolio. These investments added incremental yield to the portfolio, as interest rates rose slightly. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark (1.3% vs.1.1%)for the fourth quarter, and for the year (5.6% vs. 5.1%). Portfolio Market Values During the month of December, the District received approximately $33.5 million through the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. The sum of$20 million was deposited to the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment, and the balance of$13.5 million was deposited in LAIF to be available to meet current and projected cash flow requirements. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Longat Llg Operating Gunder Operating Monks Ending Monies(fM) ($M) 31 Dec.97 17.6 301.1 31 Mere 98 17.8 306.0 w Junem 18.1 311.5 30 Sept.98 16A 282.6 31 Dec.98 18.6 3045 1VaGm W IetY.y.EMdnl1 PcnneFAHMFa W 1FeNFAHRBBeS.dec se Page 3 n ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Three Comparative Bar Charts 4. Historical Yield Curve Graph SKIc w.ae.wmtey.amm.vtmnn�aHmranomr.mraHama a: aw;zsa: ,r,.sa Page 4 A Prepared by Finance, 212/99, 7:32 AM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $350,000,000 $300,000,000 ��� ♦.. iii ��� $250,000,000 $200,000,000 iii iii - iii iii iii j $150,000,000 ♦�� iii > iii iii P'0 t ♦�� I iii ... ... +, a ..♦ $100,000.000 ♦.♦ ... ... ... �u ♦.♦ ; iii ... ... ,,,���F P iii j $50,000,000 iii 31 Dec 97 31 Mar 98 30 Jun 98 30 Sep 98 31 Dec 98 ❑ Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\i nvestmg mtprogram Prepared by Finance, 2/1/99, 11:39 AM OCSD Liquid 110perating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification ,00,00 100 - - -- - _.. 80 70 60 .. ❑ 9/30/98 (D 50 , 012/31/98 aa) 40 a 30 - 20 — 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:lexcel.dtaVin\222OVeggllFlnancetPortfollo short term Prepared by Finance, 2/1/99, 1:26 PM r OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 -- 90 80 60 El9/30/98 .r 012/31/98 50 U a� 40 d 30 29 20 16 i 10 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio long tern graph Prepared by Finance, 211199, 2:19 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 6.00 6.76 L— — — 5.50 — — -- ------ -- - 5.25 — -- -- -- -- - _.-...... -- — — 9 5.00 4.76 i 4.60 I I 4.25 - - -- -- r-- i 4.00 - ,---�- -- -- E °E a «r a a n o M � � -�30-Jun-98 —d-3"ep-98 t31-Dec-98 G:lexcel.dla\fiM2220lgeggilFinanceW istoricalTREASURYyieldcurve FAHR COMMMEE ""`Ing T°x e S 02/10 1 93 02/29/99 AGENDA REPORT 1°""u u0m)cn County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 1999 TO MARCH 1, 2000 (FAHR99-06) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew boiler & machinery insurance for the District for the period March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000, with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $71,286. SUMMARY Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, has completed their survey of the current bailer& machinery insurance market, and recommends that the District renew boiler& machinery insurance coverage with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company for 1999-00. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 11nJenllhlMy.CbNn,t'1°cnneFAHR1FeM1RPFeMFANRPoN.Lx Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's boiler and machinery insurance program provides coverage ($100 million per occurrence/$100,000 deductible) for losses caused by covered machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, co-gen engines). Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and improvements caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the boiler& machinery insurance. This program augments the District's all-risk property insurance which covers perils such as fire, flood, and earthquake. To analyze available coverage levels and premium costs, Driver marketed the District's boiler & machinery insurance requirements to four insurance carriers. After reviewing the renewal proposals, Driver entered into negotiations with Hartford, the District's current boiler & machinery insurance underwriter, and secured policy renewal with no increase in premium cost (see attached letter). Hartford Insurance Companies, with more than $1 billion in reserves, is rated 'A4'/FSC X (Superior) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating agency), for its overall ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. Hartford remains one of the few insurance companies to offer boiler& machinery insurance with high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the District, and they offer the most competitive pricing for the 1999-00 renewal period. Staff concurs with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient funds are contained in the current budget to cover premium costs ($71,286). ALTERNATIVES N/A CECA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Broker of Record Letter SK:Ic „��.+w mu.�unverr,wmcamw.rwv.waee.ae eon R.^..4 ,� Page 2 • ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES a Division of Robert F.Driver Co.,Inc Founded on knowledge, integrity and service. ASSOCIATES February 1, 1999 Mr. Steve Kozak Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 RE: Boiler&Machinery Insurance Dear Steve, Confirming our recent discussions, we have now negotiated renewal terms and conditions with Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company, the Districts' current insurer at a $71,206 (same as expiring)annual premium. We did approach several insurers in this relatively small specialty insurance marketplace - Travelers, Chubb and CNA - but these carriers have not been able to offer more competitive pricing. Furthermore, Hartford's experience in servicing large and complex operations (such as the co-generation facility, which many companies do not wish to insure) is an asset in the Districts' management of risk. We recommend your authorizing us to implement coverage. Sincerely, ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOCIATES Wald H. McL First Vice Presi Newport Beach 4041 MacArthur Blvd,#300, P.O.Box 6450,Newport Beach, California 92658-6450 • (949)756-0271•Fax(949)756-2713 IIc,N0C36861 • www.rfdrivercom San Diego Escondido Sacmmento Fresno FAHR COMMITTEE Meetio9Drto Tosa.ofDo . 2/30/99 2/24/99 AGENDA REPORT ICm Numo Ite E 13ul /� 45 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE DISTRICT'S ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (FAHR99-07) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to retain Moreland & Associates to conduct the independent audit of the District's annual financial statements for an additional year(1998-99), and to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 72192 for an amount not to exceed $42,600. Proposals for five-year audit services will be solicited during 1999-2000. SUMMARY In February 1995, after a competitive selection process, Moreland &Associates were awarded the contract to audit the District's annual financial reports over the next four years through the year ended June 30, 1998. The audit fee for the first year of the contract was for $38,000 with a four-percent escalator each year over the next three years of the agreement through June 30, 1998. At that time, Moreland & Associates were not only deemed to be the most qualified firm, but were also the low bidder. Although the contract has expired, Moreland & Associates have agreed to extend their services for an additional year. They propose to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1999 at the same rate that was charged for the last year of their contract, $42,600. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Total all-inclusive maximum cost to audit the District's financial statements for the three year ending June 30, 1999 is $42,600. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) (This item is not applicable to the current years Joint Operating Budget, but is to be budgeted next year.) N Ny.C10+OmEtlFAHfl1FVA9TFe�1PhlfAMFglI)e E¢ Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Finance Department is implementing organizational changes this year and over the next couple of years, and this agency would benefit from the continuity of having Moreland & Associates continue to perform the annual financial audit. Since Moreland & Associates is already familiar with the Finance Department policies, procedures, and systems, less District staff time would be devoted to getting a new firm up to speed. Included within the aforementioned organizational changes that are currently underway within the Finance Department are: • The completion of the financial information system implementation through the year 1999-00. • The completion of the Finance Department Operational Audit and implementation of the subsequent recommendations. • The development of a Finance Department comprehensive policy and procedure manual for the benefit of the department's customers and staff. • Development of a Y2K test plan and setting up a test environment for the financial information system. ALTERNATIVES Open the selection process and solicit bids from other certified public accounting firms. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS None, MW R JRa 4ge Wu Wahaar.e� WRw 7&a: Ra..w. d,om Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Meedng Date To BO.of pr. 1/10/" ry34/99 AGENDA REPORT Iem 13(b) /f mL41�M Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO MAKE AN EQUITY ADJUSTMENT (FAHR99-08) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to give Danny Evangelista an 11.7% equity adjustment to correct the internal and external inequities that exist between Mr. Evangelista's salary and the salaries of other Programmers. SUMMARY Danny Evangelista has been an employee with the Orange County Sanitation District for ten years. For the past three years, Mr. Evangelista has been a Financial Analyst and has spent the last eighteen months working with the J. D. Edwards (JDE) Financial Information System (FIS). Mr. Evangelista was selected to fill an open Programmer position in the Information Technology Department on January 4, 1999. The responsibilities of the position include performing a wide variety of programming activities to support the FIS-hosted hardware and software database needs of the District. The position is critical in that it will allow the Information Technology Department to provide much needed support for the FIS, particularly during the implementation of OneWorld, the upgraded WorldVision FIS package. Mr. Evangelista's experience as a financial analyst and knowledge of the JDE Financial Information System make him a valuable asset to the Information Technology Department as well as to the District. Mr. Evangelista is the last remaining JDE expert at the District. Mr. Evangelista was offered, and has since accepted, the Programmer position. Mr. Evangelista was given a 5.5% promotional increase, in accordance with Human Resources Policies and Procedures Number C10.00, Section 5.1.3, which states that "Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional increase of 5.5%, or to the base of the new pay range, whichever is greater. . ." The 5.5% promotional increase was not enough; however, to bring Mr. Evangelista's salary up to market level. An inequity exists between his salary and the salaries of other District Programmers as well as Programmers in the external market. An additional increase is needed to bring Mr. Evangelista's salary closer market. �do" a" l dec nVIMMIOTAHRTah9 ebTRHR6PC dw R—" eaoree Page 1 The midpoint of the District's Programmer pay range ($50,304 per year) represents the external market rate for a journey-level Programmer. Five of the six District Programmers are at or above the midpoint of the Programmer pay range. If we were to hire an external candidate to fill the position, we would offer no less than market or the midpoint of the pay range. Mr. Evangelista's salary, with the 5.5% promotional increase, is $45,036 or 11.7% below midpoint. It is requested that the Board of Directors authorize Human Resources to make an 11.7% equity adjustment to Mr. Evangelista's salary to bring his salary to the midpoint, orjourney-level market rate, for a Programmer. By raising Mr. Evangelista's salary to market and retaining his skills, the District benefits from his knowledge and experience and avoids the additional costs associated with an external recruitment and specialized JDE training. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT Cost: $5,268 per year. ❑ This item has been budgeted. This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted, but there are sufficient funds. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NIA ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A ,Vadu,bap I, dWnQ1 PcraneTAHRTah P &WAHRN3 dm R—. � Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE M ng rare To W.of Dir. 02/10/99 07/29/99 AGENDA REPORT n""maRm 1ein�pW w 13(� if(dJ Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO REVIEW AND FILE THE MID-YEAR REPORT PREPARED BY STAFF FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 (FAHR99-10) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Committee review, approve and forward the 1998-99 Mid-Year Report to the Board of Directors. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Mid-Year Report for the period ended December 31, 1998. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District at the mid-point of the 1998-99 fiscal year. Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1998-99 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 44.85 percent or $20,272,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been expended. Net costs have decreased 5.08 percent in comparison with the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1998 is$448.71 based on flows of 45,179 million gallons, or 245 million gallons per day. This is $29, or 6.02 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63. Capital improvement outlays for the first half of the year were 26.4 percent of budget, or$19,060,000. 1 W I"ftlnpl0ga TAHWaaRJFeE ha 10 Jrc ea.,.. 1,5,,, Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NIA BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CECA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. District's Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ended December 31, 1998. MW w.mnw.m+ay wtnviatr.n.vAHRT*hw.t.bwh 10 dw x,n..d 1rs Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE McWn9 DM To Be.of a,. 2/10/19" 2/29/99 AGENDA REPORT Item NUMW 1/In yum� Orange County Sanitation District / FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Robert Thompson, Plant Automation Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE YEAR 2000 DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Bristol Systems for Year 2000 Compliance technical assistance to complete embedded systems assessment, reparation, and testing not to exceed $192,000 through September 30, 1999. SUMMARY This agenda item is being brought to the FAHR committee this month to inform and seek the approval of the Board of Directors for services critical to the timely execution of the Year 2000 Date Change project. Several independent efforts have now reached a point where they may be consolidated into one contract. Staff are now able to more completely scope and estimate the effort required to test and certify Y2K compliance of our embedded systems District-wide. Staff is seeking approval of this action, rather than proceeding on a delegation of authority emergency basis or waiting until the end of March to begin the work. The Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement in October 1998 with Bristol Systems to provide project management and technical project oversight. One aspect of the technical project oversight services was to assist staff in the development of the procedure to assure Y2K compliance of District embedded systems. The Operations and Maintenance and Engineering Departments required unique, detailed inspection services to scope the work effort outlined in the new procedure. Staff intended to research, correct (if required), and test all embedded systems with existing District personnel when the October 1998 Board action was taken. However, due to the resignations of two District electrical engineers and to meet the project schedule, Bristol Systems was contracted to assist both Operations and Maintenance and Engineering in the preliminary assessment and prioritization of embedded systems. These efforts were beyond the original scope of contract work, and thus a not-to-exceed $50,000 purchase order was cut for each of the two departments. These Purchase Orders were sole sourced to Bristol Systems via District procedures based on Bristol Systems familiarity with the plant processes, familiarity with the District's Y2K embedded systems Y2K procedures, and for expediency. The efforts to date have systematically organized and analyzed the risk factors for more than twenty thousand pieces of equipment. The number of pieces of equipment requiring detailed assessment, possible repair, and testing has been reduced to less H\vq EOYOe^GVNUN epeMv Repn110i8 BVN vpeMv fleeorbNNTYMGs Page 1 than one thousand unique pieces of equipment. The systematic reduction has been done to minimize the effort required without taking unacceptable risk of system failure. The current need of District Staff is for the assistance of outside electrical engineers to complete the Year 2000 assessment, testing and repair(if required) of the remaining identified critical embedded systems. Additional expert electrical engineering support is required to minimize risk and meet the project schedule. Critical items, such as pumping system components, must be tested to assure Y2K compliance. In addition, great care must be taken not only to ensure compliance, but to assure the testing itself does not risk the public health or environment. Staffs best estimate is that 1561 hours of service at a not-to-exceed price of$192,000 will be required to reduce the risk to acceptable levels for embedded systems identified as critical. Staff recommend the sole source award of this Professional Services Agreement to Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge of our plant facilities, thorough understanding of the Y2K embedded systems compliance procedure, technical capability and schedule constraints. The schedule constraints of this project are very pressing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached spreadsheet. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Special Projects 2q) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND The Board of Director's approved a Professional Services Agreement in October 1998 with Bristol Systems to provide project management and technical project oversight. At that time, staff intended to research, correct (if required), and test all embedded systems with District personnel. The project plan called for each Department within the District to assure Year 2000 (Y2K) compliance of its equipment and systems. An internal goal was established to complete the assessment phase of the project by January 31, 1999. This would allow enough time to upgrade, replace, or create workaround plans for any equipment found to be non-compliant. Operations and Maintenance was the first Department to begin to assess the embedded electronics in process equipment. The simplified Y2K compliance procedure for embedded systems the Operation and Maintenance Department has completed to date is as follows: X My Ra�enEaVbaN�penEa Repv4\1yA BwN/.yeNa RepwY'PAdYMdc R. wl a Page 2 1. The Computerized Maintenance Management System database was used as a 4 starting point. 2. The database was filtered to eliminate all non-electrical or non-electronic items. 3. Staff answered twelve questions about each remaining item to further reduce the list without increasing the acceptable risk. The questions asked if items were programmable, or had batteries, or communications ports, etc.. 4. Physical inspection of all of the items on the inventory by a team to include a maintenance technician and an electrical engineer. (Approx. 3400 items) 5. Analysis and compilation of the physical inspection reports. 6. Management Review Workshop with key Operations and Maintenance personnel to drop noncritical, low risk items. (880 items (400 unique) that require additional assessment work due to their criticality and/or complexity.) 7. Information on the remaining 880 items is being collected from various sources for assessment by qualified personnel. Staff fully intended to conduct this work internally, the staff electrical engineer that began the effort resigned shortly thereafter. A second staff electrical engineer was then assigned, and he too resigned. In late November staff determined that outside electrical engineering assistance would be required to assist Operations and Maintenance in performing the physical inspection by December 31, 1998. A contract and purchase order for $49,500 was let to Bristol Systems on December 3, 1998 to provide qualified Electrical Engineers to expedite the physical inspection of these 3,400 items in step 5. A new sole source contract and purchase order were issued since this work was not within the services approved by the Board of Directors in October 1998. This work was essentially completed in late December 1998, The purchase order was sole sourced to Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge of our plant facilities, thorough understanding of the Y2K embedded systems compliance procedure, technical capability, and schedule constraints. The Engineering Department began an effort to assess embedded systems for recently completed projects and projects in construction. The Engineering work process was different in that it did not have a database of equipment from which to start. The simplified Y2K compliance procedure for embedded systems the Engineering Department has completed to date is as follows: 1. An inventory of all electronic items was created by going through plans, specifications, and project submittals on a per project basis. 2. The same twelve questions about each remaining item were answered to reduce the list without increasing the acceptable risk. 3. A comprehensive physical assessment was completed. Since there wasn't an existing database with reliable field verified data, each items was verified for manufacturer, model number, and the accuracy of the questions responses in step 2. 4. A physical inspection of each project area to ensure all devices installed or modified by the project were accounted for on the list. Items added by change order, or not fully documented in the project were missed in step 1. 5. Analysis and compilation of the physical inspection reports. 6. Management Review Workshop with key Operations and Maintenance and Engineering personnel to drop non-critical, low risk items. (Scheduled for February 11,1999). X A.p Gb4yMolBVN IgeMe Re 11 M Bu,d IpeMe Repmb'OAPYlKb[ R,,,,,.. ,„ Page 3 The Engineering Department began using internal staff to complete the embedded f systems assessment. However, in Mid-January 1999. Engineering determined that additional outside Electrical Engineering assistance would be required to complete this initial assessment in a timely fashion. A new sole source purchase order and contract was let with Bristol Systems for$49,500 on January 28, 1999 to assist Engineering in the completion of the work. A new contract was required because the scope of the services provided by Bristol Systems was much greater than for Operations and Maintenance, although it had relatively fewer items. The Engineering Department required assistance for steps 2 through 6. The Operations and Maintenance Department required assistance for step 4 only. The sole source award was justified on the same basis as for Operations and Maintenance. The Technical Services Department started the embedded system assessment process with a much smaller and more complete inventory list. However, complex laboratory, storage, and sampling equipment make up the majority of the list. At this point, Operations and Maintenance, Engineering and Technical Services are ready to begin the advanced assessment, reparation (if necessary), and testing phase of the Y2K embedded system procedure. The scope of the services will be very similar for all three departments. RECOMMENDED SERVICES Staff recommend a sole source Professional Service Agreement be established with Bristol Systems to provide electrical engineering assistance for embedded systems to the Operations and Maintenance, Engineering and Technical Services Departments for the advanced assessment, reparation, and testing aspects of the Year 2000 Date Change Project. The Operations and Maintenance and Engineering Department items identified in prior work requiring further assessment study by definition are critical to keep the wastewater flowing and treated, or are safety related items and carry an unacceptable risk of failure. The Technical Services Department equipment requiring further assessment study are required to support permit compliance and day to day operation of the treatment plants. The advanced assessment phase includes: • Vendor web site searches for compliance statements/corrections • Vendor testing information • Equipment manual search for date functionality • Review of circuit diagrams for real time clocks • Contracting vendors by phone and/or letters • Development of test plans where necessary Electrical engineering support will also be critical in the safe and effective testing of critical District systems. Systems such as the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, influent pumping systems, city water systems, Central Generation Systems, and key pump- station pumping systems are absolutely essential to maintain the public health and environment within our service area. Where assessment and/or testing reveal Y21K related problems, electrical engineering assistance will be useful to correct hardware and/or software problems. H1 Gh,,d,l A Apenda Re,aN,1 M8 WAge RepaM1YIAIdYMOs ReeieM. •,� Page 4 Staff recommend the sole source award of this Professional Services Agreement to -4 Bristol Systems based on their working knowledge of our plant facilities, thorough understanding of the Y2K embedded systems compliance procedure, technical capability and schedule constraints. The schedule constraints of this project are very pressing. SCOPE OF WORK The recommended scope of work includes the following elements: • Work with District staff to complete an embedded system assessment. • Assist District staff in producing, executing, and analyzing compliance testing procedures and testing for computer systems and embedded systems. • Review documentation provided by Operations-Maintenance on remaining components. Documentation to be provided by Operations-Maintenance shall consist of(whenever available) circuit diagrams, data sheets, technical documentation, maintenance manuals, user manuals, manufacturer web pages, and third party data. For each such component Operations-Maintenance shall identify the associated 0&M system. Taking into account the 0&M risk factors for these systems, make a recommendation for each such component as to whether the District should test it for a Y2K problem. Assist O&M management in making decisions on further assessment. Such management shall decide on components remaining to be tested. • For components to be tested recommend testing procedures and assist the District in the preparation of test plans for them. If a third party develops such plans, then provide an independent review of such plans. This should include any acceptance testing plans for components yet to be accepted from third party contractors andlor system integrators. • Assist the District in the execution and analysis of such tests. • Assist the District in the development of final assessment documents, including project plans for reparation, final system testing, and deployment. • Provide technical support in gathering documentation and data from manufacturers, maintaining the project schedule, dealing with the details and paperwork of the process, and other project management duties as the District may see fit to assign. • Provide project management expertise and services for the completion of the Reparation and System Testing phases of the Y2K process. • Provide test design, development, execution and analysis expertise and services for both component and system testing in the Assessment, Reparation, and System Testing phases of the Y2K program. CONCLUSION District staff have been systematically analyzing and documenting the Y2K compliance of our embedded systems. Staff has proceeded with great expediency on this issue. The District's aim has been to uncover any problems with operating systems as soon as possible to allow enough time to effectively reduce to acceptable levels, or eliminate entirely, the risk of system failure. These services will be required through September 30, 1999 on an as needed basis. N Fq.!•\ip[Mi16PN/pwd Rept4\1BA Bpitl�peM RapN`DlPdYMGc Rom.. •,� Page 5 } ALTERNATIVES Delay Y2K compliance of embedded systems four to six months and accept increased risk of system failure. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Spreadsheet Kws.mspwm�eme fie.a.o�n+000 eo.ro bww nwwmaaraaz a^ ^^ Page 6 Year 2000 Date Change Project Cost Summary (through 6130199) OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION STAFF OUTSIDE MATL TOTALS 1 IPUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS $ 351,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 431,000 Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants; through the 120"oulfall 2 TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS 468,000 195,000 20,000 683,000 Achieve full compliance with discharge quality requirements 3 ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE 234,000 54,000 288,000 Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions of permits issued by RWQCB, EPA, and SCAQMD 4 (MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES I 643,500 66,000 30,000 739,500 „ , Bdstrol Systems Inc. (Project Management 8 Assessment to-date) 203,000 Bdstrol Systems Inc. (Project Management now tit end of June) 103,000 Bristrol Systems Inc. (Proposed Advanced Assessment) 192,000 CPG ($50K needs assessment, $100K contingency plans) 150,000 Vantage 8 EQE 60,000 Cooper Cameron 22,000 Miscellaneous Vendor Support(General Electric, ABB, etc.) 95,000 $825,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS, revised 2110/99 $1,250,000 $825,000 $50,000 $2.125,000 Please note that all numbers are estimates based on the best available information. Specifically, the material cost estimate could change significantly if major hardware issues are uncovered. Cost Summary Revised Febl O.xls 2116/99 /24i9a BOARD OF DIRECTORS " Zt2 t To 2/29/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Num1w He Numbe u rn Orange County Sanitabon District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Originator: Michael D. Moore, ECM (620) Manager SUBJECT: Wheeler Ridge Option Agreement GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize payment of$10,400 to EK Development Corporation for a second month's additional payment in connection with the option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kem County. SUMMARY On November 18, 1998, the Board authorized the General Manager to enter into an exclusive agreement for the option to purchase the Wheeler Ridge site for composting District's biosolids and to initiate and conduct due diligence research. On December 28, 1998, the District secured the exclusive rights to the option to purchase the Wheeler Ridge site. The contract established the option to be $10,400 per month, which covered the current mortgage, operating expenses, and property taxes. At the time of contracting, staff estimated that four months would be needed to complete the due diligence process. Even though the District did not have a signed agreement until December 28, 1998, the owner of Wheeler Ridge allowed District staff and consultants on several occasions to begin our exclusive on-site due diligence efforts in late November and early December. Information gleaned during this period raised concern over the ability to gain public acceptance for biosolids composting at this specific location. It was also determined that the potential for flooding is a concern as evidenced by the recent deposition of large amounts of soil, as a result of last year's rains. On December 22, 1998, still prior to entering an option contract, District staff and an environmental firm performed a preliminary biological site assessment that resulted in numerous concerns about the potential for using the site as a compost facility. District's staff believed it had the preliminary approval to begin due diligence research in early November as a result of our briefing to the OMTS Committee. Relying on the perceived early approval the owner stopped her efforts to sell the property, effectively taking the property off the market in reliance on the District's resolution. The delay in entering the contract was due to the bureaucratic time required in negotiating the contractual details between staff, our general counsel, and the owner's attorney. Since the due diligence process took nearly two months to obtain the necessary information to make a decision, irrespective of when the agreement was signed, staff recommends that the District compensate the property owner for the second month of the option agreement. mw.e R:My.�MAg Rq %IMB MAgm RpcYNE4Nm 11m.Cs.M Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A Mp M NMq EMWO.^E.�N.paN.Regrb\tpJ2 BmN.pxtl.Rgp6'OlpMn 110 C¢Eat R. ermse Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To It W. 2/4/99 2/24/99 AGENDA REPORT ImmN,anber JbmNyobe 99-0O1 7A Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: OUTSOURCING OF 175 MILES OF SMALL SEWER LINE CLEANING IN REVENUE AREA 7, SPECIFICATION NO. M-062 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Sewer Line Cleaning Agreement with Hoffman Southwest Corp. D.b.a. Professional Pipe Services for the cleaning of approximately 175 miles of small diameter sewer lines in Revenue Area 7, for Sewer Line Cleaning Specification No. M-062, for an amount not to exceed $227,115.00 for one-year period with options for two one-year renewal periods. SUMMARY Under agreements made some 30 years ago, the District is responsible for maintaining and cleaning all small wastewater collection lines in Revenue Area 7. This area contains some 200 miles of lines in the 4" to 12" range. - Last year, staff received guidance from the Board to competitively bid the cleaning of these lines. In June 1998, we prepared a specification and bid documents. Included in our specifications was a requirement for the successful bidder to televise 10% of the total lines cleaned. The lines to be televised, would be selected at random by the District. The purpose behind this is to insure that the Contractor had cleaned the lines as required by our specifications. If not, the Contractor would have to re-clean the lines at no cost to the District. In order to check for the accuracy of our specifications and drawings, staff decided to contract for the cleaning of a 25-mile area in the City of Irvine, commonly known as the Irvine Business Complex. Bids were received from a number of firms. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) was the lowest responsive bidder and as a result, received the award. IRWD completed the work on time and within the budget that we had established. Based on the success and lessons learned in the Irvine Business Complex, staff prepared a specification (including a requirement to randomly televise 10% of the lines)to bid out the remaining 175 miles of small lines in Area 7. On December 15, 1998, bids were received from 5 firms. The bid prices ranged from a low of $227,115.00 to a high of$472,770.00. Staff has evaluated the proposals and is recommending that an award be given to Hoffman Southwest Corp, d.b.a. Professional Pipe Services (Pro Pipe), which was the lowest responsive bidder, in an amount not to exceed $227,115.00. Hoffman Southwest Corp. is a contractor with 47 years experience in the maintenance and inspection of sewer service. They are headquartered in Mission Viejo and have 26 branch offices in 6 western states. They are a $40.0 million per year company and have done similar work for the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, City of Norwark, City of Manhattan Beach, IRWD's Michelson Water Reclamation Plant under contract with CH2M Hill, City of Burbank, and others. mdE aWl4p dMWp lmn eMOMTS%FeW—er deenmp ageeea 11�010e Cmi..ex Pagel District staff toured their facility and met with their staff to inspect their policies and procedures, , equipment and safety record. Staff is satisfied with the results of this inspection and can offer no reason why they should not be awarded the contract. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will be available to present a verbal report should it be required. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost of the contract will be $227,115.00 and will take approximately nine months from the start of the contract to complete the 175 miles of cleaning. Staff anticipates that the project will begin in April 1999. Additionally, the contract will repeat on an eighteen-month cycle. Contract is valid for one year with options for two one-year renewal periods. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Trunk Maintenance, Section 4, page 9) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Award to another bidder 2. Not award the contact CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Bid tabulation EEH: tw mamn Iu dWVe IMMdp• Ws ss x.wasmoNem Re arras umeex Paget Y xv I January 21, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Edwin E. Hodges Director of General Services Administration FROM: Marc D. Dubois Contracts/Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Sewer Line Cleaning Specification No. M-062 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, December 15, 1998, for providing Sewer Line Cleaning, Specification No. M-062, for a one-year period beginning April 1, 1999. The table below details the bid tabulation. Unit Rate 4" Una Rate S" Unit Rate 8" Unit Rate 10" Unit Rate 12" COMPANY Dia.Pipe per Dia.Pipe par Dia.Pipe Per Dia Pipe par Dia Pipe per Total LIP OF LIF 11F OF Hoffman Southwest Corporation $0.245 $0.245 $0.245 $0.245 80.20.5 E227,115.00 dba Professional Pipe Services California Pipeline Inspection,Inc. $0.254 $0.254 $0.254 30.254 $0.254 $235,458.00 Empire Pipe Cleaning S Equip.Inc. $0.295 $0.295 $0.295 SO.345 $0.445 S280,315.00 San Con Engineering.Inc. $0.42 WAS $0.44 $0.45 $0.46 5408,877.50 National Plant Services,Ina $0.51 SO.51 $0.51 $0.51 $0.51 $472,770.00 After site review of contractor's equipment and detailed review of bid documents, staff recommends the award of a contract to the Hoffman Southwest Corporation,dba Professional Pipe Services, the bidder with the lowest annual cost of$227,115.00, for providing sewer line cleaning with 10% CCTV, per the unit price shown above, for a one year period beginning April 1, 1999. ar D. Du ois C cktra /Purchasin Manager Ni Arhontes Manager, Collection Facilities Operations and Maintenance (�Ok) Str d Director of FI ance H.A"MTAtrI=MS1MM062rASMEM0 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeltlR9 Dae To 2TiII9 r. z-zaev AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Iem yymEc 1 Orange County Sanitation Distract FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEE FOR PROPOSED GOLDEN OAKS SENIOR COMMUNITY, A LOW INCOME APARTMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PLACENTIA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file letter submitted by Secured Property Management dated February 15, 1999; (2) Receive and file memo from General Counsel dated February 12, 1999; and (3) Consideration of request by Secured Property Management to waive or reduce the residential capital facilities connection fees. SUMMARY Secured Property Management has requested a waiver or modification of OCSD capital facilities connection charges for their proposed Golden Oaks Senior Community at 1111 Golden Avenue, Placentia, California. See attached letter dated February 15, 1999. The proposed residential development consists of 16 one and two bedroom apartment rental units that are to be designated as low-income senior housing. The current ordinance, adopted by the Board of Directors, does not differentiate between a senior rental development and other residential developments. Furthermore, the ordinance contains no authority to administratively waive or change the fee that is established by the ordinance. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) A total capital facilities connection charge of $35,872 would be payable to the District under the current ordinance. This is based on a per unit basis; 16 dwelling units x $2,360 per dwelling unit, minus five percent (5%) retained by the City of Placentia for processing and administration per our agreement with the City. RM EbYpKGVWyN�Re{w6"MB d ApMgr R!%Nb$i4e LmIJ dot Rwned. vmee Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not applicable. ' ALTERNATIVES 1) The Board of Directors can deny the request by Secured Property Management to waive or reduce the residential capital facilities connection fees. 2) The Board of Directors can enact an amendment to the ordinance after notice and hearing, specifying the exact amount and the reasons for a reduced fee, as determined to be appropriate. CECIA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Secured Property Management dated February 15, 1999. 2. Memorandum from General Counsel to David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, dated February 12, 1999. DAL:RJR:jak:jo:gc HA .dtaWgenda\Soard Agenda Repods11999 Board!Agenda ReportsZ299Vtem 13.Eot H:My.Gd ,Wa�Ml nda R*Wa IW2P N 1yeMa flepvMN]9Plbm 13 R-i armee Page 2 y Secured Property management 02/15/99 David Ludwin County Sanitation Districts Of Orange California 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, Ca. Ref: Golden Oaks Senior Community 1111 Golden Ave. Placentia Ca. Dear David, Thank you for taking time to discuss my questions and concerns about the sewer connection fees on our Senior Citizens apartment project. As you know this is a low income Senior Citizen apartment design to assist the elderly. As per the Federal housing and home finance section 1 of Stats. 1986 "The Legislature finds and declares that housing which is affordable, decent, safe and sanitary is not available in adequate supply for elderly citizens. The elderly population in California has experienced dramatic growth during the past 15 years and is projected to increase by 38 percent by the year 2000." "The Legislature finds and declares that large numbers of elderly households have low incomes as evidenced by the fact that the median income of elderly households is 53 percent of the median income of all households in the state.Many elderly renters also pay excessive amounts of their income for housing. Over one-quarter of California's elderly households pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing." Due to the nature of the Senior's limited income and our desire to keep the units affordably priced to meet their needs we submit for a waiver or modification of sewer fees to make the housing units economically feasible. 1975 N. BATAVIA STREET•ORANGE.CA 92865 •PH: (714)998-3790• FAX(714)282-0835 `1 Secured Property Management As per the Government Code Chapter 4.3 Section 65915 " When a developer of housing proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of the local government, the city, county, or city and county shall provide the developer incentives for the production of lower income housing units". "The city, county, or city and county shall establish procedures for waiving or modifying development and zoning standards which would otherwise inhibit the utilization of the density bonus on specific sites. These procedures shall include, but not be limited to, such items as minimum lot size, side yard setbacks, and placement of public works improvements." The city of Placentia has allowed the development a density bonus and reimbursement of all city fees to assist the development of this Seniors project. We submit to the board that the project is a valuable low income Seniors project that meets all Federal and State qualifications to qualify the Development to ask for further assistance in either a waiver of the Sanitation fees or at least a reduction in the county rates. Thank you for your con sid�tion and concerns of our expanding Senior's needs. 4OaksSe Goldommunity 1975 N. BATAVIA STREET • ORANGE, CA 92865 • PH. (714) 998-3790• FAX (714) 282-0835 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dace ToB of Dir. 3-24gg AGENDA REPORT IteM NuMber Iem1umbe a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R (REBID), AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R (REBID). GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Reject all bids; and (4) Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid). SUMMARY The plans and specifications for this project, Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R, were bid on February 10, 1999. Three bids were received ranging from a high of$10,922,111 to the low bid of$7,497,199 submitted by Barnard Construction Company. The engineer's estimate for both Contracts together was $6,750,000. After opening the bids on February 10, 1999, staff questioned the apparent low bidder, Barnard Construction Company, regarding the appearance of a mistake in their bid tabulation. This resulted in the discovery of a difference between the linear footage of one of the repair methods as shown in the schedule of prices compared to the same item of work as shown on the plans. Staff intends to correct this apparent discrepancy and readvertise the project. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file the bid tabulation, reject all bids, and authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R. (The tentative bid date is April 6, 1999). H N.p.d MpenECW NMa Rgc 11MB dAgi Rey,b`03Wlbm 14 RaN saaae Page 1 J f PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The construction budget for Contract No. 3-35R is $6.5 million. The construction budget for Contract No. 3-11 R is $250,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (1998-99 Budget capital Projects zone 3, line d) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Award contract to the apparent low bidder, Barnard Construction Company for $7,497,199. CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was fled on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Bid Tabulation and Recommendation Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-11 R Budget Information Table — Contract No. 3-35R RLC:jo HAwp.dla%agendWBoard Agenda Reportatl999 Board Agenda Repods`D299Vtedn 14.dm M Mftlapenaae,uC agenda Fe{onsNIM ewN yeW Reeomnxgwum 1e aw R.a..a aaae Page 2 February 10, 1999 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R (REBID), AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-11R (REBID). Engineer's Estimate: $6,750,000 Construction Contract Budget: $6,750.000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. BARNARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. $ 7,497,199.00 2. SANCON ENGINEERING B, INC. $ 9,976,119.25 3. COUCH &SONS $ -10,922,111.00 - 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above pmjecL Due to a discrepancy in the District bid documents, I recommend rejecting all bids. (J;"-;( - David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering 'Corrected amount— original bid amount was for$10.922,144. H:W P.dtalen9UOBS&CONTRACTSI135R1435R Rebid Tab.doo Revoed 05/19198 OCSD . P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain vallev.CA 92728.8127 . (714) 962-2411 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS OSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECWTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIONTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST :A:UTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 100% Design Staff $ 330.500 $ 330,500 $ 330,500 $ 330.500 $ 211,250 64% Consultant PSA $ 344.000 $ 344.000 $ 344.000 $ 5,720 1 $ 338.280 98% VConstruction tract $ 6.500.000 $ 6,500,000 0% er $ 6,500 $ 6,500 0% ff $ 402,000 $ 402,000 0% 712,400 $ 712,400 $ 0% $ 8,327,400 $ 8,327,400 $ $ 705.500 1 $ - Is 368.220 $ 581,530 158% H,\wp,c11e ipbs&mntmch;U-35R1135R budgetbi 022499 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 100% Design Staff $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 34,350 39% Consultant PSA $ 37,000 $ 37000 $ 37,000 $ 37000 Is 34,150 93% Construction Contract $ 250.000 S 250,000 0% Construction Other $ 500 $ 500 0% Construction Stall $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 68,200 $ 68,200 $ 0% TOTAL $ 496.200 1 $ 496,200 $ $ 131,500 1 $ - $ 131.500 $ 75,500 57% H lwp.dta`angyobs$conlraclsX3-3SR%3-11 R buoge1b1022499 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS weeore oae T°2/ ads.2Ra/g9 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Iem Numbe • is Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager SUBJECT: INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (THE TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SLUDGE OF INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve one week of staff time for out-of-country travel for Jane Tran. SUMMARY Jane Tran, Source Control Project Specialist, has prepared a technical paper that has been accepted for presentation at the March 1999 TEPA-US EPA Bilateral Cooperation Programs "International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology (The Treatment and Management of Sludge of Industrial District)" in Taiwan, and is requesting that the District authorize her attendance at the conference. All expenses will be paid by the U.S. EPA. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff time only. All expenses paid by EPA. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Ms. Tran has been invited by EPA to make a presentation at the "International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology (The Treatment and Management of Sludge of Industrial District) in Taiwan in March 1999. She has been selected as one of three speakers because of her reputation and expertise in the industrial wastewater treatment field. She will present a technical paper regarding pretreatment control and management, and resource recovery technologies. H:%w .Eta\ta135901vmvAncrAgenaaTaf n2. ° Page 1 r This conference is part of the partnership between the U.S. EPA and Taiwan EPA and provides opportunities for professionals from the U.S. to share their wastewater technical knowledge with their colleagues. All expenses will be paid by EPA. Ms. Tran will be using 40 hours of regular time to attend this conference. ALTERNATIVES The alternative is for the District not to approve Jane Tran's attendance at the conference. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Joint Boards: 1. Copy of workshop agenda 2. Invitation Letter Verifying Payment of Expenses by EPA MT:Ivw H:\wp.dWaVS359Nvm ndWA endaTaK"n2.dm Page w Q\TEMP\POTW.WPD DRAFTAGENDA 1999 TEPA- US EPA Bilateral Cooperation Programs International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology (The Treatment and Management of Sludge of Industrial District) Objectives: Exchange the treatment technology and management of sludge of industrial district between TEPA-USEPA to enhance their processing strategy,policy, regulation pretreatment and operation of sludge. Specific Topics to be Addressed: —Pre-Treatment Control and Management —Sludge Generation from Wastewater Treatment Plants of POTW and Sludge Treatment Technologies —Resource Recovery Technologies[waste-to-energy] Dates and Location: The workshop will take place in Taipei on March 25 and 26, 1999. One or two day facility visiting will precede the workshop. By virtue of two facilities visiting, US delegates and local experts exchange experiences to enhance the treatment technologies. Agenda: The 1999 bilateral program includes two major activities -- one or two days field trip will be on March 23 or 24. [Tues and Wed.] --workshop for the sludge in the industrial district will be held on March 25 and 26[Thursday And Friday] Besides a two-day workshop held in Taipei, a one or two days field trip will be preceded by it.All the US delegates are expected to participate this field trip traveling to the local industries. Consequently,recommendations and suggestions from US experts can be provided to local industries during the field trip. The two-day workshop includes three experts from US that will be paired with the local experts. After each presentation by US delegations,a local expert will make a brief summary about the speech in Mandarin. In the meantime, synchronous translation will be provided in the speech. Participants: The participants for the workshop will include US delegates,operators from wastewater treatment plants, engineers from consulting firms,and representatives from government agencies. The primary participants are operators of wastewater treatment plants,professors from University and experts from Authorities. It estimated around 120 audiences involved in the workshop. Tuesday March 23, 1999 Site Visit Wednesday,March 24, 1999 Site Visit 02/17/99 16 02 FAX 206 553 0149 ES AFFAIRS REG d V001/002 6 Y UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY p �Ft' REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 February 17, 1999 Ms. Jane Trm Project Specialist County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 9127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Ms. Tran: I would like to invite you to travel to Taipei, Taiwan to participate as a speaker at an EPA sponsored workshop titled an "International Forum on Wastewater Treatment and Management Technology" from March 20 to 27, 1999. As a member of the team, all eligible expenses (airfare,taxis,reasonable telephone, meals and hotel costs) during your stay will be paid. You have been sent EPA Region 10 guidelines which provides more detailed information on making arrangements and expenses. Enclosed you will find a travel voucher. This travel voucher should be submitted 5-7 days after the completion of your trip and be sent to Barbara Legas,EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, OMP-146, Seattle,WA 98109. Any questions you may have with respect to travel and expenses should be directed to Paul Steele at (206) 553-0311. To expedite processing your travel voucher, please send a deposit slip prior to your travel to Paul Steele,EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, OMP- 146, Seattle, WA 99109. Upon completion of the trip,you will be asked to complete a brief trip report. The report must be completed within 15 days of your return. If you have any questions regarding this workshop, please contact Lee Otis or Ann Lesperance , EPA Region 10 International program managers at(206) 553-1745. We look forward to your participation in this workshop with our Taiwanese colleagues. c ly, e Otis 0V 10M FOAM n-p1 I temational Program Manager FAX TRANSMITTAL II •=�^wa.L.� T. QrtC ^✓Q Fri t� lJ„S CC: Paul Steele o..„• n o _ I ,� Barbara Legas Yu-Ting Liu "'• -C( ;I ��59 `°" —55 —Ol•1 ct o enclosure: travel voucher Hsr+,sm-ors„-,we swe-�o� usaaur sources•nMi�ly',MTiOX Avnnmemaxyuneo.� M &YEAR FINANCIAL nRF. RATIONAL REPORT ;r } r� 4`I ! 1� Nay SP N1I4! q q ti � Os YYT T i IIIE For the period ended December 31 , 1998 Orange County Sanitation District, California Table of Contents Section1 - Overview........................................................................................................1 r Financial Report- Section 2 -Joint Operating 8 Working Capital Budget Review r Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge...........................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department...................................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category................................................................A Summary of Revenue by Line Item............................................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6 Comparison of Expenses Incurred by C carter by Una Rem.......................................8 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process.........................................................10 Chart of Staffing Trends ...........................................................................................11 Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Fund Review Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1 r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirement- Current Year ...........2 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirement - Project Life..............8 Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Areas Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas........................................................1 Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2 Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review.........................................................................A Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5 Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6 r Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7 Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8 Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10 Section 5 - Self Insurance Funds Budget Reviews r General Liability Fund Budget Review.......................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Budget Review...................................................................2 r Operational Report Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1 r r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L L L L L L L Li L This Page Left Intentionally Blank. L L L u L L L L L L Overview Mid-Year Financial & Operational Report December 31, 1998 The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1998-99 mid-year comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1998-99 performance objectives as established in the 1998-99 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. -� Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review. At December 31, 1998, 44.85 percent, or$20,272,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been expended. This is a net decrease in costs of 5.08 percent, or $1,085,000 from the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1998 is $448.71 based on Flows of 45,179.19 million gallons, or 245 mgd. This is $29, or 6.02 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63 while flows are only 2.92 percent lower than budgeted. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 1998 include: • Salaries and Wages - Joint Operating Personnel Cost were at 52.68 percent of budget through mid-year while staffing was 33.75 full time equivalents (FTE's), or 6.2 percent below the total 549 FTE's approved in the 1998-99 budget. Personnel costs were high in the first half of the year due to (1)the distribution of annual bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2)the early retirement and associated accrual payoff for 14 employees, and (3) annual leave payoffs are distributed in the first half. Cost savings associated with these early retirements will be realized in 1999-00, and thereafter. • Memberships—At mid-year, Membership expense totaled $95,203, or 68.29 r percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a majority of the District's membership are renewed in the first half of the year. r • Office Expense— Supplies—The mid-year expenses for Office Expense —Supplies are at $94,172 or 70.91 percent of budget as a result of the need for new letterhead, envelopes, and business cards due to the consolidation of the District and associated change in the District's name. Section 1 - Page 1 1998-99 Mid-Year Report U L • Notices&Ads-At mid-year, expenses for Notices & Ads was at 85.82 percent or j $11,671 of the 1998-99 budget of$13,600 due to the unexpected executive search L for two Executive Management positions. i � • Training -Mid-year 1998-99 expenses of$97,800 are low at 11.64 percent of a+ budget. During the first half of the year, the training program has gone through restructuring and planning for FY 1998-99. Staff has scheduled several centralized li training classes and expenses will increase in the second half of 1998-99. • Gasoline, Diesel & Oil- Expenses were high at $118,000, or 57.91 percent in the vi first half of 1998-99, due to the timing of when purchases are made. Maintenance buys grease and oil in bulk, which staff believes will last five to eight months. r • Contractual Services-Other - Most of the projects relating to other contractual services are in progress and planning stages at December 31, 1998. With expenses of$349,000 at only 19.2 percent of the budget, staff expects costs to significantly LJ increase in the second half of FY 1998-99. I ; • Professional Services-Audit & Accounting - Mid-year expenses of$46,765 are at u 109.8 percent due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year and the final payment on the L sewer connection fee audit. • Professional Services - Other-Mid-year expenses of$277,000 are only at 25.2 L percent. Most projects are only in process or in the planning stages at December 31, 1998. Staff expects costs to significantly increase in the second half of FY 1998-99. - • Research & Monitoring- Mid-year expenses of$796,000 are only at 34.7 percent of the $2,293,000 budget. Biosolids and strategic process studies were in the planning stages during the first half of FY 1998-99 and are currently in process. Expenses for these line items will be incurred during the third and fourth quarters. W • Service Maintenance Agreements - Expenses of$337,000, or 28.7 percent of the budgeted $1,177,000 are low due to the timing on when these agreements are ` renewed. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end. i • Telephone-At mid-year telephone expenses totaled only $99,000, or 35.1 percent r+ of the budget because charges for the new T-1 line will not be incurred until the third and fourth quarters of 1998-99. L L Section 1 - Page 2 L Overview r • Water—Mid-year water expenses are only at$396,000, or 40.5 percent of budget r because the expected increase in the price of Green Acres Water has not been realized. It is anticipated that water expenses at the end of the year will approximate $850,000, or 87 percent of the 1998-99 budget. r • Insurance Premiums — Insurance premiums at mid-year are only$552,000, or 35.8 percent, due to the timing of when the budget is prepared and when insurance quotes are provided by brokers. The budget was prepared assuming that insurance premiums would increase. Instead, actual insurance premiums have decreased ,r and will only total $1.2 million, or 82 percent of budget at year-end. • Other Increases in the Second Quarter over the First—Other than previously .+ mentioned items, there are two other line items that had noteworthy increases in the second quarter over the first. Other Waste Disposal increased $209,000 due to the reclassification of invoices erroneously posted to Solids Removal. Power realized an increase of$201,000, which is attributed to a typical increase in usage during the fall and winter months. • Variances in the Expenses by Treatment Process from the Prior Year—The major changes in the treatment process expenses from the prior year is primarily due to the reallocation of staff, and redefining process related expenditures in an effort to improve the classifications of treatment process costs. r r r r r r r Section 1 - Page 3 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report - Comparison of Mid-Year Cost per Million Gallons Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) - Last Five Years 5501 51a]B — 50U �15 4Bdee , y� 4esaB 500 . 4d5 rs r ri. e aea e4 450 — 400 so 9495 9596 9fi-97 91-98 9BA9 2ntl Veer 3ntl Ydar 2ne Veer 2ndat Vedr 2ndQV BMnual udgM ao- eye ao- era oo- .w oo- me as 6ue9m r As highlighted in the graph shown above, the cost per million gallons at mid-year has been within 3.5 percent of the year-end actual for the past four years. This fluctuation r is mostly due to the time it takes to complete various operating activities and when they can actually be recorded within the District's accounting records. , Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through the mid-year, as budgeted for 1998-99, and as r actually incurred through mid-year of 1997-98. All three charts are quite similar showing little change between the prior mid-year actual, current year budget and current mid-year actual. r For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through mid-year for the last five years, Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for December 31, 1996, 1997, and 1998, Section 2 - Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through December 31, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 - Page 5 provides a r summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through December 31, 1998, and 1997, Section 2 — Page 6 and 7 provides a summary of expenses by line item through r December 31, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 — Page 8 provides a comparison of expenses r Section 1 - Page 4 _ r Overview incurred by quarter, Section 2 - Page 10 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through December 31, 1998, and 1997; and Section 2 - Page 11 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total authorized, actual staffing positions filled, and vacant staffing positions. s Capital Improvement Program Review: — sao.000.oao f70.0N ON 560.000.000 ssa,000.000 W.000.000 5]0.400.OW S2O.OM.O:W :f 510.0MAN f0 — 12131198 Actual Projected 1993-99 Originally Estimated Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 1998-99 Capital $19,060,000 S51,591,000 Outlay-$72,186,000 At December 31, 1998, total Capital Improvement Program expenditures totaled $19,060,100, or 26.4 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1998-99, as depicted by the chart above. Casts are low through mid-year as most projects for 1998-99 are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays and are expected to be $20.5 million or 28.5 percent below budget by year-end. Section 3 — Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each District's share of the total amount of the capital outlay requirements incurred through December 31. For more detailed information, Section 3 - Page 2 through 7 provides a summary of the capital improvement construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3 — Page 8 through 13 provides a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Section 1 - Page 5 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L L Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At December 31, 1998, revenues from all Areas totaled $65.6 million, or 49.7 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention Lr revenues, budgeted at$30.8 million, are at 46.7 percent of budget, or$14.4 million, and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas budgeted at $73.8 million, are at 45.1 percent of budget, or$33.3 million. Both of these revenue sources are low because the majority of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the second half of the fiscal year. Interest and Miscellaneous Revenue are at $14.7million, or 71.24 percent of budget due to the higher than expected rate of return on the District's investment portfolio of 8.1 percent, J whereas the budget estimated a 6.0 percent rate of return. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $51.2 million, or 32.57 percent of L budget at December 31, 1998. District Operating and Other Expenditures, budgeted at $9.3 million, are only at 32.0 percent of budget, primarily because of the majority of the line cleaning work to be done is scheduled for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Ll District Trunk Sewer Construction costs, budgeted at $22.9 million, are only at 29.0 percent of budget, or$6.6 million, due to the award of fewer than expected construction Li projects. Conversely, COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at$30.4 million, are high at 68.9 percent of budget, or$20.3 million because the majority of the principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal year. L Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers' Compensation, and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund L accounting Is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses Incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund mid-year revenues totaled $478,000, or 86.1 percent of L budget and total expenses were at $734,000, or 81.5 percent of budget. This is high due to the settlement of the Walcon Construction claim during the second quarter of FY 1998-99. u operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) L pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of December 31, 1998. Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and L incorporated into the 1998-99 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to L L Section 1 - Page 6 L Overview further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 1998-99, workplans were also developed at the divisional level. At December 31, 1998, 85 percent of the District's performance objectives and, 72 r percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. Significant staff resources have been reassigned to ensure the District's smooth computer transition to the year 2000 and this redeployment may cause some workplan projects to be deferred until next fiscal year. r r r r r r r r r Section 1 - Page 7 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Li L u b L L I` L1 L This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L L L L L L L Section 1 -Page 8 I Lv J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Departmental Gallonage Charges — For the Six Months EnEeG Deoemher 31 1998 — Engineer.ng O 3 AI 0% 51+y GSA — 10% Finantt 5% Comm [ Inla TMAll — Erec Mgmr 2% Toxh Si,. R/R 15% 2% Oepanmeraal Gallonage Charges 199&g9 Bpoget — Engineenng 0% O&M GSA 55% — 0% Fn. )% Cornin 1% 1% Ins Ted, — 5% .r�„U Exec,Mgm 3% Tach S. MR 15% 3% — DepaMronW Gallonage Charges — For the Su Mot EnOM DecanOer 31, 1997 Erg.., O 8 M - 0°4 fi296 GSA 8% Frerre— 6% Comm 1% b a%Talent Exec Mgmt — 2% TMI Svcs Hitt 14% 3% Section 2—Page 1 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 L 12131194 12/31195 12131/96 12/31197 1908.99 12/31/98 Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual ! Flow in Million Gallons 43,927.97 43,284.61 44.63t.77 45,573.73 9307S.00 45,179.19 �r General Manager Department 14.M 12M 17.08 11.14 13.72 9.58 Communications 4.30 S." 5.47 6,35 5.22 L Human Resources Department Human Resources 10.13 4,12 6.25 4.79 4.43 3.7E Education &Training 5.00 7.33 7.18 &67 3513 Safety&Emergency Response &92 6.98 3.91 5.17 &31 u Total 1013 13.04 20.54 15.88 1&27 10A1 Finance Department Finance Administration 15.01 19.34 17.91 1&45 1&78 14.34 L Accounting 8.80 10.42 10.80 10.74 10.88 9.89 Purchasing &Warehousing 5.91 7.25 7.03 5.79 6.85 &82 Total 29.72 37.01 36.74 32.98 39.52 30.05 General Services Department L General Services Administration 12.45 7.28 7.55 443 4.57 4.41 Collection Facilities Maintenance 2.31 6.00 5.27 1.98 295 &36 Plant Facilities Maintenance 34.88 33.43 37.28 38.56 43.85 41.88 L Total 49.44 45.71 50.08 33.14 61.47 49.65 Information Technology Department I.T. Administration - - - - 271 1.88 j User Support - 6A0 5.23 7.53 6.27 3.57 L Network Support - 18.23 9,35 679 &10 4.79 Programing&Database - - - - 328 2.31 Plant Automation - 4.48 3.21 5.25 3.33 Total 2463 19.06 17.54 25.69 15.66 L Operations&Maintenance Department Opns&Maint. Administration 9.40 13.31 14.05 2.38 234 2.12 O&M Scheduling - 4.54 4.49 - O&M Process Support - - 7.65 7.53 4.18 Plant No. 1 Operations 67.95 75.46 75.31 a$,,88 69.42 Plant No. 2 Operations - 105.93 105.81 105.03 93.45 93.61 LMechanical Maintenance 55.90 46.S4 45.68 48.00 47.61 48.67 Electrical&Instrumentation Mice. 45.25 39.39 43A4 5215 49.99 46.17 Air Quality&Special Projects - - - 7.01 6.00 5.93 Central Generation - 20.45 22.06 22.23 29.73 25.79 I Plant Operations 149.00 L Total 260.35 298.21 310.99 32D.36 30413 296.79 Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 1.97 6.19 8.09 &21 7.16 7.54 L Environmental Management 110.28 54.91 39.48 20.07 36.10 28.73 Environmental Sciences Laboratory 35.47 32.74 30.14 3&90 31.07 31.42 Source Control 10.54 5.84 5.05 3.95 3.80 2.67 j Total 1$8.30 99.68 83,34 72.13 79.03 70.38 V Engineering Department Engineering Administration 0.32 3.68 1.10 - - 0.01 Planning &Design 1.69 9.35 1.65 0.93 1.00 0.06 Construction Management 2.11 &57 3.43 0.76 0.65 1.96 Total 4.02 16.60 B.08 1.69 1.55 2.02 Total Joint Operating Expenses 525.98 551.52 548.33 520.33 5W.73 400.16 L Less: Revenues (52.60) (45.82) (37.55) (51.eg) (51.10) (41.45) Net Joint Operating Expenses 474.38 505.70 510.78 468.64 465.83 448.71 I I.d Section 2-Page 2 1 J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 1998-99 12131196 12/31/97 Kevised Year to Date Budget — Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 12131/98 Realized General Managers Department 781,418 507.748 1,276,850 432,722 33.89% r Communications 242,797 249,492 590,600 235,787 39.92% Human Resources Department Human Resources 278,949 218,214 412,540 188,281 40.79% Education 8 Training 327,151 327,184 806,600 161,782 20.06% r Safety 8 Emergency Response 310,637 178,201 481,350 149,492 31.06% Total 916,737 723,599 1,700.490 479,555 28.20% Finance Department r Finance Administration 799.366 749,544 1.748.350 648,068 37.07% Accounting 482,023 489,549 1,012,750 446,683 44.11% Purchasing&Warehousing 313,761 263,992 638,940 262,938 41.15% Total 1,596,139 1,503,085 3.400,040 1,357.689 39.93% - General Services Department General Services Administration 336,970 210,792 453,370 199,200 43.94% Collection Facilities Maintenance 235,209 89,133 274,150 151,703 55.34% r Plant Facilities Maintenance 1,662,980 1,666,030 4.063.030 1,892,093 46.57% Total 2,235,159 1,965,955 4,790,550 2,242,996 46.82% Information Technology Department I.T.Administration - - 252,590 84,711 33.54% r User Support 233,424 343,288 583,800 161,497 27.66% Network Support 417,307 309,556 753,970 216,203 28.68% Programing&Database - - 303.390 104,282 34.37% Plant Automation 199,950 146,329 488,220 160.503 30.83% Total 850,881 799,173 2,381,970 717,196 30.11% Operations&Maintenance Department Opns 8 Maint. Administration 627,D76 108,302 217,375 95,714 44.03% r O&M Scheduling 200,397 - - - - O 8 M Process Support - 348,857 700,425 188,785 26.95% Plant No. 1 Operations 3,367,913 3,432.357 6.225,110 3,136.143 50.38% Plant No.2 Operations 4,722,488 4,786,539 8,698,190 4,225,629 48.58% �+ Mechanical Maintenance 2,038,779 2,214,782 4,431,080 2,198,876 49.62% Electrical S Instrumentation Mtce. 1,938,804 2,376,589 4,652,940 2,086,062 44.83% Air Quality 8 Special Projects - 319,646 614,030 267,7% 43.60% Central Generation 984,577 1,013,098 2,766,850 1,210,194 43.74% r Total 13,880,034 14,600,170 28,306,000 13,409,111 47.37% Technical Services Department .r Technical Services Administration 387,850 374,080 666,800 340,554 51.08% Environmental Management 1,761,170 1,324,922 3,359,900 1,298,045 30.63% Environmental Sciences laboratory 1,345,202 1,408,154 2,975,250 1,419,357 47.71% Source Control 225,390 180,073 354,000 120,718 34.10% "a Total 3,719,612 3,287,229 7,355,950 3,178,714 43.21% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 49,095 74 130 418 321.54% — Planning 8 Design 69,180 42,358 92,920 2,730 2.94% Construction Management 153,087 34,586 60,600 88,058 145.31% Total 271,362 77,018 153,650 91,206 59.36% r Total Joint Operating Expenses 24,472,939 23,713,469 49,956,100 22,144,976 44.33% Less: Revenues (1,676,027) (2,355,670) (4,756,100) (1,872,625) 39.37% Net Joint Operating Expenses ,793;4T'F M/7, 4� 4—T.M Or —2TT/7,31PT 44—.F5%- r Section 2—Page 3 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Summary of Expenses by Major Category L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 ti u Expanse Exlema Ingleoe Increase Percent gapped TbN 1nN (Oaaraasa) Budget Panalning Daecri Ft. llM 12/31188 12731191 f % Maall p dgat u Fbt Salary,Mhageafl Benefim 23,818$40 11,928,148 12,082,855 (154.]0]) (1.28) 49.87 11,990,092 A4minletr .Expeneoe 711,880 35405 241,883 112,N2 46.72 49.85 357,M5 Printing BPubliratlan 341,700 156,078 1B2,875 (27.817) (15.13) 45.77 186,6]2 Trelning B MsaCngs I.OM.840 197,201 441,707 (244,506) (55.35) 18.36 876,639 Yrl Operating Exp . 5,379,280 Z4115,307 2,750,945 (335.50) (12.20) 44.90 2,SBa8B3 CanlraMals Ions 7,037,350 2,663,770 2.717,724 (33,854) (t E) WA4 4,353,SB0 V Profoeeunnl Soril. 1.897,000 567.245 697,891 0W.646) (18.72) 29.90 1,329,755 Masserah B Man Bering 2,282,500 7%,911 978,Ml (182.290) (1664) 34.M 1.49851041 L lbpalra B Malnnenaneo 3,09.040 1,750,382 2.054,506 (314,124) (15.22) 44.89 2.1MAS wiluea 3.744,450 1,6P.W9 1,666683 8,606 cu 44.79 2,067,3111 L Ogler Materiels,supplies, and Servkee 2,5M.M B08,428 M,M 55.436 651 mm /,881292 coazal«conflotner (2,912.9o9) (12BB.479) (g64,37a) (322.1os) 81.40 44.1e (1,Bz6,42z) V Total JoInI Operating Expense Q.M.100 22,144,978 23,713,469 (1,588,483) (6.61) 44.33 27,811,124 MatenuesflOAeata (4,756,100) (1.872,875) (2,355,670) 483.045 (20.51) 39.37 (2M.475) Mat JOlnt OpereBnp Epp . 45,200,000 202.72,351 21,357,799 (1,085,448) (5.08) 44.85 24,1W.649 Gel bnage Flw(MG) 93,075.w 45,179.19 45,5M.n (395) (0,87) GaMnage Floar(MG0) 2 w 24554 247.68 (2) (0.86) L Galbnape Flow(f's MG) 465.83 44a.71 488.84 (20) (425) L L L L L Section 2—Page 4 i Yr J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 r Re.anue Revenue Mvarrue Increase Increase r Budget Tlru Thru the Inning thru (Decrease) (Dmwea9e) Deaeiption 199a89 12MM 12=911 Budget 1213997 $ % r Inter District Sewer Use 2,175,000 542,447 24.94 1,632,553 1,2D9,541 (667,094) (55.2) Wastehaukr 400,000 219,246 54.81 180,754 178,955 40,291 22.5 Sludge Disposal 900,000 345,997 38.43 564,103 525,519 (179,622) (34.2) Scrap Sales 20,0D0 - 20,0D0 _ _ _ Other Sales 5,0W 7,189 143.78 (2,189) 3,188 4,001 126.5 Rents&Leases 100.000 96.068 95.07 4,932 76,451 18,617 24.4 General Non-Operating 50,000 26,382 52.76 23,618 (1,494) 27,876 (1,865.9) Vehide B Equipment 350,000 151,189 43.20 198,811 24,657 126,532 513.2 Sampling Charges 286,100 171,946 60.10 114,154 115.645 55,301 48.7 Power Saks 470,000 313,261 66.65 156,739 223,208 90,053 40.3 r Total Joint Operating Revenues 4,756.100 1,872,625 39.37 2,853,475 2,355,670 (483.045) (20.5) r r r r r r ri r Section 2-Page 5 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 % V Exec. Expense Expanse ht .. Increase Budget Thm Th. Remaining Thru (Decmase) (13scrosso) Mecdpmon 1""0 12131UN 12131M Budget IV31197 & % Seldea,W49as,&Bane6la Selamm&Wages 31,173,440 16,421,195 6260 14,752245 15=.308 838,887 &36 Employee genets: L RelimmeM 2.491,900 a84.1m 39.40 1,513,775 1,lldi'I 3 (R.") (726) Group lnsumnoes 2,758,M0 1,518,014 55.03 1,240,656 1,305,630 212,354 16.27 TUNon Rsimbueemenl 43.723 - (43.723) - 43,783 - Unitmm Re,tal 60,31D0 29,930 49.64 30,370 28,934 996 3.44 41r1 Mb em Compeimation 219.01DD 109,500 New 109,500 im,180 2320 2.16 UnempbymaM I... 3920D 4,142 10.57 35,058 18,962 (14,820) (78.16) Total Benefit, 5,575.1O1) 2,689.434 48.24 2,885.6136 2,521,839 167,595 ads S laAas,Mesa,&Bonofits 36,748,540 19.110.629 5200 17,637,911 18,104,147 1.006,482 5.56 Seldes&Ben.Allot. Dimc111ndimct AllocCurfiNat (12,830,300) (7.182.481) 55.98 (5,647,819) (6,021.292) (1.161,189) 1926 Bet Saa ,Ms.&Samoa; 23,918240 11,928,148 49.87 11,990.092 12,D82855 (164,T07) (128) Mad,Supply,&9malcmm Adminitramae Expenses Memberships 139,420 95,203 6&29 44217 54,746 40,457 73.90 Olgre Exp-Supplies 132,810 94,172 70.91 36638 76.006 18,166 2&910 I 010m Expeee-Ohm 124,520 4$592 39.02 75.928 42.757 5,835 1&65 L Small Compulr Items 242250 104,121 4798 136,129 59,494 44.627 75.01 Mimr F.Hure,Fllures,etc. 72,880 12.767 17.52 60,113 ew 3.07 "All "Ming&Publication j Repm4M . 246,950 116,436 47.15 130.514 88,123 30,313 3520 IL PdnmrslCutsida 89,600 22,518 32.35 47,082 72811 (5on3) (0-07) Notices&Ads 13,600 11.5)1 $5.82 1.929 13,578 (1,907) (14.04) lohoroPmomaw 11,650 4,d03 38.12 7.147 10,163 (5,760) (5668) Training&Meetings L Meetings 234,340 99.445 4240 134895 127,983 (28,538) (2230) Taiping 839,500 97,758 11.64 741.7" 313,774 (215,968) (8584) Opemtlng Expotess Chemical Coagu 1.358.130 587.114 4230 801,016 581AW 6,031 164 SNBde Cool 1,310,430 603,967 am 706,463 704,892 (100,715) (14.29) Odor CwNol-Tool 1,744,700 704,748 44.95 990.952 1.019,349 (234,601) (23.01) Chemi ws-Coacm mucm Open. - 2,743 - (2.743) - 2,743 - Miscala ocus Chemical - Z423 - (2,423) - 2,423 - Illsselll Gnome.Diesel&Oil 203,750 117,986 67.91 $5,764 92,196 25.790 27.97 Tools 132500 37.941 28.63 94,559 40,562 (2,621) (5.4� SON,Pohl.&J .Supplies 88,570 38,066 40.72 52,502 31,298 4,770 1524 Lab menimis&Supplies M3.400 155,149 42.69 =251 179,4<6 (24,297) (13.54) Omar OmmiS PPIics 147,800 87,258 59.04 80,542 102,319 (15,061) (14.72) (Confined) L L W Section 2-Page 6 LaI J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 r Ezpense ExpeTma Exppnep Incresso In.. Budget Th. Thru Remaining U. (Ooc-) (ueermen) .� Des>hp8on 1988.99 1201198 12n1I98 Budget IWIM7 $ % cx nNwed: Cednxa xI Servlcea ,r Solids Rerlw.a1 4,128,390 1,803,956 43.70 2324,434 1,935514 034,558) (694) OMer Wa Dsposal 4W,340 283.538 59% 196.802 211,308 82230 38.91 Gn7vndskeepm9 a JanilWal 2OZ380 60.811 3005 141,569 49.303 11,508 nu O.W&Leo$ml 111,0D0 38,947 35.09 72053 38.334 613 1.60 Oxygen Plan Oyer 285,000 137.366 48.03 148,632 130,500 6.848 5.26 Other 1,820.240 349,150 19.18 1.471,090 349,M5 (615) (0.18) proleealonal Services Legal ioo,= 157,857 39.42 242643 203,224 (45.367) (22.U) r Audil B Aemuning 42800 46.766 109.78 (4,185) 41,600 5,165 1242 Enghaenng 353.000 85.176 24.13 257.824 156.612 (71,4a6) (45.61) OBer 1,100,900 277,447 25.M 823.453 296,465 (19,008) (641) r RemarchBMonhorMg E.nxnneoW WMonng 1,832000 602711 W.93 1,029209 501,348 1,383 OM Air O fty Moe W 25000 1,096 4.39 23.902 85128 (59.030) (98.17) Resear 635,500 192,102 W.M 443,398 316.725 (120,623) (39.35) � RopNre aMelntaunce Maherale a Services 2,722500 1,413,224 51.91 1,W9,276 1,705.657 (203,443) (17.19) Svc.W.,Agm rfts 1,175540 337,158 28.66 839,382 357.839 (2DA81) (sn) miltee Telephone 282,600 W,144 35.08 183,456 91,961 7.183 7.81 Oesel FOT Oene ears 34.000 - - 34,OOD - - - NaWr4lGas 1,175000 489 88,554 41.56 6448 645908 (158,3m) (24.21) r Po4er 1,273,150 992802 54.40 580,548 539.970 152.632 2d27 W01er 878,700 395.789 40.52 580,911 390,644 5,145 1.32 OMerop dng Suppllee ONside E9utp panel 100,080 57.778 5297 51,304 58267 (491) (0.84) r Oalde Eyvip Rental 275,400 108859 54.42 125541 25,282 124,597 493.M I...Premi. 1,460,000 522350 M78 937,650 628217 (105,887) (16.85) Fregn 58,550 25,372 44.87 31,178 34.012 (9240) (28.70) r My O,e ,Expanse 214,100 82241 38.41 131,859 92219 (glen) (IBM) AOh9)Opem8n9 Foes 142,000 67,0.12 40.45 84,588 - 57.432 Ge.1 Manager Cann ..W 259,400 - - 259,400 - - - Otre Nond7 Ex nsx 57.1% 11,398 19.0 45,792 12415 (1,017) (8.19) Mn1L1,Supp,B Se'. 2e960,760 lTgM.3116 39.73 i7p17,454 1 ,-%7 (1,091,881 (8.67) Coat AlbcLod SOMsr (2.912.900) (1,288A78) 40.16 (1,626.422) (964.373) (322,1W) 33.M Nat J.O.Aad ,SYPp.a Sorv. 28.037,860 10218,828 3924 15.821.032 11,630,614 (1,413.786) (1218) Total J.O.Ptx ulmmenffi 49.956,100 II,144,B78 40.33 27.811,124 M.713.469 (1,588,490) (8.81) Lass: Revnnue (4,758,100) (1,872.625) 39.37 (2851,475) (2355.670) 483,045 (20.51) Net J.O.Expendihurec 45.200.000 20272351 44.85 24.927.M 21,357.799 (1,085,448) (5.08) r Section 2-Pape 7 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item For the Quarters Ended September 30 and December 31, 1998 �I Increase In Expense Expense Expense Expense Incurred Increase Thm Thru From 913098 In 2nd Qtr Decrease Description 120198 SK10198 Thru 1201198 Over tat Qtr % it Salaries,Wages,&Benefits Salaries&Wages 16,421,195 8322,468 8.098,727 (223,741) (259) t Employee Benefits: y Retirement 984.125 493,928 490,197 (3,730) (0.76) Croup Insurances 1,518,014 733.445 784,569 51,125 6.97 Turdon Reimbursement 43,723 25,602 18,121 (7,480) 022) Undonn Rsdal 29,930 15,611 14,319 (1292) 4828) r� Workers Compensation 109,500 54,750 54,75D (1) (0.00) Unmiployment lnsuranw 4,142 3,680 462 (3218) (87A5) j Total Benefds 2,689,434 1.327,016 1.362,418 35,403 2.67 V Salaries,Wages,&Benefits 19,110,629 9,649,484 9.461,145 (188.339) (1.95) Salaries&Ben.Agee. DimcV Indirect AllocCorf/Diot (7,182.481) (3,316.831) (3,865,650) (648,819) 1655 Net Salary,Wages&Benefits 11,928.148 6.332.653 5.595,495 (737,158) (11.64) Matt,Supply,&Services Administrative Expenses Memberships 95203 59,423 35.780 (23.643) (39.79) Office Exp-Supplies 94,172 54,423 39,749 (14,673) (26.%) Once Expense-Other 48,592 28,623 19,969 (8,655) (3024) Snell Computer Ilene 1D4,121 45,083 59.038 13,954 30.95 Minor Fumiure,FuWres,etc. 12,767 11,020 1,747 (9274) (84.15) Printing&Publication r Repro4i+louse 116,436 55,196 61240 6,04.5 10.95 PmNng-Outside 22,518 22,128 390 (21,738) (9824) I Notices&Ads 11,671 6,648 5.023 (1,625) (24,44) y Photo Processing 4,403 2910 2.193 (17) (0,76) Training&Meetings L Meetings 99,445 49,088 50,357 1269 2.68 Treinitlg 97,756 45,510 62246 6.737 14A0 Operating Expenses Chemical Coagulants 587.114 306,984 2B0,130 (26,855) (8.75) y Sulfide Control 603,967 298,689 305278 Use 221 Odor Control-Total 7&4,748 401,532 3a3216 (18,315) (4.56) Chemicals-Cogeneration Oper. 2.743 2.743 0 (2,743) (99.99) ARscellareous Chemicals 2,423 976 1.447 471 4820 Li Gasoline,Diesel&O,I 117,986 75,186 42,800 (32.386) (43.07) Tools 37,941 20,660 17,281 (3,379) (16.35) SON,Paints.&Jan.Supplies 36,068 21,489 14,579 (6,910) (32.16) Lab Chemicals&Supplies 155.149 90,172 64,977 (25,196) (27.94) Other Operating Supplies 87,258 42,B25 44,433 1.607 3.75 V L Section 2-Page 8 L.i J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item - For the Quarters Ended September 30 and December 31, 1998 Increase In _ Expense Expense Expense Expense Incurred Increase Thru Thru From 9=198 In 2nd Otr Decrease Description 17J31198 9130198 Thru 12/31/98 Over let Oar % - Continued: Contractual Servltes Solids Removal 1,8D3,956 1,127,692 676,254 (451,428) (40.03) "I Other Waste Disposal 293,6W 42,525 251,012 208.488 490.25 GrouMskeeping B Jani erial 60,811 32,047 28,764 (3.283) (10,24) Outside lab Services 38,947 24,159 14,788 (9,372) (38.79) - Oxygen Plana Oper 137,368 68,6S4 65,004 0 0.00 Other 349,150 168,337 182,813 16,475 9.90 Professional Services ,r Legal 157,857 83,381 74.496 (8,8W) (10.63) Audit B Accounting 46,765 27,087 19,6m (7,409) (27.35) Engineering 85,176 27,592 57.585 29,993 108.70 09M 277,447 95,656 181,791 86,135 90.05 r Research 8 NbnBodrg ErrAro mental Moratoring 802,711 390,980 211,731 (178,249) (45.85) Air QualBy,Monitoring 1,098 320 778 458 143.13 -' Reseach 192,102 80,ODo 112,102 32.102 40.13 Repairs 8 Maintenance Matenals B Services 1,413,224 476,811 936,413 459,603 95.39 Sc.Mile.Agreements 337,158 201,095 136.063 (65,033) (32.34) UtIlities Telephone 99,144 45.203 63,851 8.557 16.89 - Diesel For Generators - - - Natural Gas 469,%4 224,303 255,251 40.948 18.26 Po ,ar 692,802 246,015 446,597 200,672 81.53 - Water 395.789 202,164 193,835 (8,519) (4.21) Other Operating Supplies Outside Equip Rental 57,776 23.295 - 34,481 11.187 48.02 Disbict Equip Rental 149,859 73.746 76,113 2,388 3.21 r Insurance Premiums 522,350 253,387 258,954 15,577 6.15 Freight 25,372 14,410 10,962 (3,448) (23.93) Misc.Operating Expense 82241 36,538 45,703 9,165 25.08 r AQMD Operating Fees 57.432 54,834 2,598 (52,238) (95.28) General Manager Contingency - _ _ _ Other Non-Oper Expense 11,398 4,244 7,154 2,909 85.54 Maus,Supp,3 Sm. 11,91�.306 -T.'663,174 ---- Cost Alec-Corf 80mer (1,286,475) (357,3S5) (899,113) (311,748) 132.11 -' Net J.O.JMatls,SuPp,8 S.- 10,216,828 5,275,809 4,941,019 (334,790) (6.35) Total J.O.Requirements 22,144,976 11,608,462 10,536,614 (1,071,947) (9.23) r Less: Revenue (1,872,625) (1,159,917) (712,708) 447,209 (38.56) Net J.O.Expenditures 20,272,351 10,448,545 9,823.806 (624,738) (5.98) r Section 2-Page 9 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Increase Increase L Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 12131/98 12/31197 $ % Treatment Process: v Preliminary Treameio 1,931,690 2,616,898 (685,208) (25,18) Primary Treatnent 2,089,654 2,073,057 16,587 0.80 �+ Semmdary Treatment 1,798,355 1,459,882 338,473 23.19 Cryogenic Ham(Plant 2) U4,024 165,957 (41,933) (25.27) V Effluent Disposed 270,515 389,005 (118,490) (30.46) I Solids Handling 6.951,428 6,100,757 (149,331) (245) V Cogeneration 1,632,476 2,179,902 (547.426) (25.11) Utilities 488,965 474,511 14,454 3.05 V Electrical Distribution 255,671 607,952 (242,281) (47.70) fAscellaneous Buildings 2,587,520 3,359.795 (772,275) (22.99) V Air Quality 443,340 411,323 32,017 7.78 Laboratory 1,646,088 2,062,522 (406,454) (19.80) V Source Control 2,907,272 1,921,898 985,374 51.27 Total Joint Operating Requirements 22,136.976 23,713,469 (1,576,493) (6.65) L Less: Revenues (1,872,625) (2,355,670) 483,045 20.51 V Net Joint Operating Expenditures 20,264,351 21,357,799 (1,093,448) (5.12) L L L L L L Section 2—Page 10 _ J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents December 31, 1998 rw 6]3 66fi 60 10 560 560 549 575 . 50 &JO/95 (Y3pN6 6!!697 6130196 Il/I196 p Actual ❑Vacant At December 31, 1998, the total head count was 525 employees, or a full time equivalency of 515.25. Section 2 - Page 11 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L L L L L L L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L L L L u L L section 2— Page 12 L CIP Review Capital Improvement Program—FY 1998-99 For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Plant 1 $3,331,072 collection Projects 17% $6.643,689 35% Plan[2 $2,991,322 16% m Equipment terns $982,495 5% Merplant 8 Joint Special Projects Facilities ^ $2,344,877 $2,766,946 12% 15% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure -$19,060,401 Revenue Area 13 Revenue ^ $141,551 Area 2 1% 94,256,446 Revenue Area 3 $6,798,516 ^ 36% Revenue Area 5 $1,630,764 ^ 9°0 Revenue Area 6 5477,840 Revenue 2% Area 1 Revenue $1,355,906 Revenue Revenue Area 7 lea Area 11 Area 14 92,450,M 611019,668 $929,655 13% 5% 5% Total Capital Improvement Funding -$19,060,401 Section 3— Page 1 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year j For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Ll 1998-99 1998-99 1998.99 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Estimated"Outlay @ 12131198 Outlay Outlay Collection System Improvement Projects Revenue Area f a Same Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 87,000 - 67,000 67,000 b Frame,Cwer and Coating Rehab. 20.000 20.000 20.000 Revenue Area 1 Total 87,000 87,000 87.000 J Revenue Area 2 a Mods.To Newhope-Placentia Sewer 46,200 19.951 20.249 46,200 j b Carbon Canven Dam Sewer and Pump St. 100,000 2,093 97,907 252.000 LI c Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief - 55 (66) 100 d Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 746,500 40,478 705,022 40.500 e IS Freeway Widening Project,2.35 56,100 (2,028) 58,128 4.000 f Pump Station Improvements(10%) 122,850 8,5g8 114.152 13.200 9 Santa Ana River IMr.Shut 05 Gate Repl. 460,000 441.278 18.722 626,300 h Same Ana River her.Realignment B Prot. 500.000 111.549 380.451 162,000 li I Frame,Omer and Coaling Rehab. 20,000 - 20.000 20,000 V m Miscellaneous Projects 80,000 H0,000 80,000 Revenue Area 2 Total 2.130.850 622.074 1,508,676 11244,300 Rmmnuo Area 3 Iul a Pump Station Improvements,(14%) 171.990 12,177 159,813 18,480 b Modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer 170.500 113,934 56.566 134.000 c Seal Beach Blvd. Rehab.,3-11R 367.200 6234 350,966 355.000 IIrJ' d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 2,OB0,000 27.388 2,052,612 2.108.500 a IS Freeway Widening,3.37 46.200 53.814 (7,614) 94,000 f Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hillsboro 2,589.500 48.429 2,541,071 183.500 I ' g Miller-Holder Improv., Imperial Hwy.,3.38-3 1,452.000 2,741,994 (1,289,994) 3.532.000 64 h Frame.Cwer and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 1 Miscellaneous Projects 80.000 80.000 80.000 Revenue Area 3 Total 8,977,390 3.003,970 3.973,420 8.495.480 Revenue Area 5 L a Pump Station Improvements,(28%) 343,980 24.353 319,627 30,900 b Beaudrimmon of Bay Bridge Pump Station 73,000 59.024 13,976 88,000 c Newport Blvd.6 PCH Widening 1,098,100 (148,789) 1.246,989 904.510 d Ralowticn of Lido Pump Station 2.350.900 1.105,783 1.155,117 2.490,000 a Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilstation 62,700 - 62,700 82,700 I Frame,Cwer and Coating Rehab. 30.000 - 30.000 30,000 L 9 Miscellaneous Projects 120,000 120,000 120,000 Revenue Ares 5 Total 4,078,880 1,130,371 2,948,309 3,7181170 Revenue Area 6 a Pump Station Improvements,(6%) 73,710 5,219 68,491 7,020 b Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 796,150 (107,144) 002.894 664,980 � I c Fairview Relief Sewer 2,207,000 116,493 2.091.507 2.316.000 Ir d Watson Avenue/California St.Sewer - 4,212 (4,212) 43,212 g Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 5,000 - 5,000 6.000 h Miscellaneous Projects 20,000 20.000 20,000 Revenue Area 6 Total 3,100,880 17,180 3.083,880 3,047.122 L Section 3—Page 2 u CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 1998-99 1998-99 1999-99 - 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projeebd Estimated Outlay @12y31198 Outlay Outlay Revenue Area 7 a Pump Station Improvements,(33%) 405.405 28,702 376,703 43.560 b Impmvemene W Main St P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 358,610 197,356 161,254 428.120 e Orange Park Aces Trunk Replacement 1,327,000 862,860 464,140 1,6m3,000 f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 134,000 466 133,534 134,000 ,-, g College Ave.Pump Station Parallel Force - 3,561 (3,561) 4,600 h Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 500,000 94,046 405,954 125,000 i 'B"Street 8 Michell St Sewer Replacement 330,000 12,674 317.326 273,000 j Gisler Red Hill Trunk Relocation 385,500 4,994 380,508 49,000 r k Wscellanui Repair of Local Sewers 574.000 - 574,000 674,000 1 Fame, Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10.0()0 10,000 m Miscellaneous Projects 40,000 40.000 40,000 - Revenue Area 7 Total 4,054.515 1.204,659 2,1159,856 3,344.280 Revenue Area 11 - a Pump Station Improvements,(9%) 110,585 7,827 102.738 11.880 b Go!denwesl St Sewer Replacement 418,000 16,971 401.029 27,000 c Go!denwesl SL Trunk Sewer Replacement 304.000 51,606 252.394 266,000 d Warner Avenue Pump Station 65,000 1,079 63,921 11,100 a Heil Interceptor 196,700 52,364 143,336 275.000 f Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 195,000 - 195,000 190,000 g Huntington Beach Sewer B Abandonment 50,000 28.101 21,899 264,000 - h Fame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,0W - 10,000 10,000 i Miscellaneous Projects 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 Revenue Area 11 Total 1.388,265 157,948 1,230,317 1,094,980 .. Revenue Area 13 b Capacity in Carbon Canyon Interceptor 23,ODD - 23,000 23,000 e Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 70D - 700 700 f Capacity in Sanate Ana River Interceptor 93,40D - 93.400 93,400 g Capacity in South River Interceptor 14,500 - 14,500 14,500 h Capacity in New Taft Interceptor 11,90D - 11,900 11,900 - Revenue Area 13 Total 143,500 - 143,500 143500 Revenue Area 14 - a Improvements to Main SL P.S., 7-7-1 (72%) 922,120 507,487 414.6W 1,100.680 b Fame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Revenue Area 14 Total 932,120 507.487 424,633 1,110,880 r Collection System CIP Total 22,902,980 6,643,689 18,259,291 20,285,712 Section 3-Page 3 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year I I For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 LI 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 ,; I 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Yrl Estimated Outlay @12(31/98 Outlay Outlay Reclamation Plant No. 1 1.Pre irrerwy Treatment 1 j a Head arks No.2 Control System Upgrade,J-3 1,115,000 413,134 701.866 450,000 N c.Sunflower P.S.Drive Replxxnent,P7ffi 326,000 - 326,000 - 2-Primary Treabrred a.Pr inary Effluent Pumping Automation 95,000 - 95,000 It.Pnmary Treatrravrt 72 MGD Expansion,P7-37 1,000,000 225.314 774,656 1,226,000 4wO c Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 100,OOD 129,030 (29,030) le9,030 d.Adv. Primary Rhymer Batdling PLC Progm. 109,500 - 109,500 3.Secondary Treament rl b.Seoondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P 21110,000 817,364 (617,364) 1,378,000 c.Drain Modifications at Activated Sludge Plant,P 110,000 911 109.089 1,000 4.Solids Handing&Derratenrg b.Automation of Solids Storage Fac, Pl60 150,000 55.5&5 94.435 56,000 v. 5.Utility Systems a Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P 10,000 554.964 (674,964) 665,000 Is Elect. Facility 6loddns&Safety Upgrades,Pl- 70D,OOD 19.581 660.419 80,ODD �. Transfer to Project Belau (12,500) - 0Z600) Alarm Beacons for venting of Gas Holder 12.500 785 11,715 1.000 c.Fac MOQdrs&Safety Upgrades,Pt-00.2 10,000 15,973 (5,973) 16,O00 d Drainage Impmv.At Ram 1, of-40-3 218,000 201,685 16,335 227,000 LJ f.Chemical Facility MDOM,PI-46-2 1,200,000 26.630 1,173,370 51,000 e.CNG Refueling Station,P7-51 433,816 406,389 27,427 490,000 S.Safety Improvemerts a Seirnic Retrofit of Non-Snrchae Systems, P1-4 218,000 76,554 141,446 77,000 to Seismic Retrofit Seneural tons,PIM 304,000 10,507 293,493 11,000 c.Sesatic Re"M of Four Structures, PI.444 1,125,000 23,607 1.101,393 224,ODO -- 7.Mscellaneous&Support Projects r a Landscaping Project for Undeveloped Area 33,000 1,318 31,682 2,000 b.Replace Air Corxfidonirg Units @ Warehouse 35.000 - 35,OO11 c.Sept Six Cea Fred Ceiling Healers @ Fleet 20,000 - 20,000 - d Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters @ B 29,0w 29.000 - aWasteSideStreamAutomation 50,000 - 50.000 50,000 I.Allowance fa Planned Small Projects 1,900,000 221.781 1.678.219 443,OD0 Sub-Teal -Reolamadon Plaml 9.491.316 3.331.072 6,100.244 5.637,030 � Treabnern Nam No.2 1.Prelininary Treatment a.Headworks Impnovennems Q Plant 2,P2£6 1,ODO,000 2D,841 979,159 21,000 L b.Improvements to Influent Samping System,P2 35,000 - 35,000 - 2.Primary Treatrnen It.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 666,000 204.975 371,025 335.000 3.Secondary Tneatrnem L a.DAF.Thickener Surface Skim.Sup.Rats 65,000 - 65.000 - b.Rehab or Secondary Fadill P2-74 485,OOD - 485,000 4.Solids Handling&Dewstering 75,000 40,000 a.Corveyor Bed Rapt.-Solids Storage Loading 75,000 - It,Devtaering Belt Press Rebuld 220,OD0 295 219,705 150,000 c.Di9eation&Dewaterirg ReliaNRefubishnrem - - - d.Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 817,000 141.410 675,590 342,000 L e.TNAS Feed to Digesters F&G,P2-39-1 110,000 78,D49 31.951 116,O1110 f.Solids Storage Facility at Plam 2,P2-60 1,000,000 472.347 527.653 663,O1110 _ li L Section 3-Page 4 L CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year - For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 r, 1997-98 Actual Remaining Protected Estimated Outlay @ 1213198 Outlay Outlay 5.Utility Systems a.Digester Gas Flare Control System Upgrade,P 154,000 - 154,000 - r c.Modify Fire Protection,Signs&Water Sys,P24 10,000 584.124 (574,124) 585,000 d.Fire&Water Sys Modifns,P246-2 7,000 10,153 (3,163) 11,000 e.Electi Fac Medifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-1 1.500,000 62,664 1,437,338 463,000 f.Chemical and Plant Water Modifns,P255 10p00 253.402 (253,402) 264,000 r g.Air Compressors for Plate Air System,P261 240,000 28.706 211294 79.000 h.Gas Compressor Redundancy,P2-79 525,000 525,000 - 6.Be"Improvements r a.Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2355 31,000 9.253 21,747 119,000 b.Seimic Retrofit of NonStruchlre Systems,P2-5 131,000 216,410 (85.410) 217.000 c.Seismic Retrofit,Structural hems P2-53-2 469.000 13,592 465.408 14,000 d.Rehab Tunnel Lighting System,P2-78 279,000 - 279.000 - r 7.Miscellaneous&Support Projects a.Maintenance Building,P2-353&-1 70.000 343,666 (273,666) 344,000 b.Warehouse Building,P265 1,130,000 45,436 1,084,564 671,000 c.Fac Modlfns&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 10.000 97,185 (97.185) 98,000 r d.Replace Air Conditioning @ Liquid Oxygen Ro 21,000 - 21,000 - e.Replace Air Conditioning @ Oper Center 22,000 - 22,000 I.Replace Exhaust Fans@ Operations Center 12.100 - 12.100 - r g.Replace EAstion Supply&Return Duckwork 30,000 - 30,000 h.Plant 2 Facilities Engineering 1.900.000 308.814 1.591,185 315,000 Sub-Total -Treatment Plant2 11,025.100 2.991,322 8.033.775 4,867,000 r Interplant and Joint Faellhies 1.Plant Automation&Computerization a.Computerized Fee Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25 385,000 80,087 304,913 151,000 b.Sec.Treatment Monk&Ctd System Upgrade, 300,000 58,852 241.148 99,000 - c.Power Monitoring and Control Systems,J-33-3 198,000 - 198,000 - d.PlantReinventon/Automation Project J42 2,706,000 645,754 2.060,246 1,106,000 e.Conv.Of Modbus+Date Hwys te Ring Config 210,000 42,376 167.624 43,000 r f.Fiber Optic Upgrades 456.500 108.208 348,292 109,000 g.SCADA Administration Savors Improvement 160,000 - 150,000 120,000 h.SW Plant 1 Q Field Fiber Optic Term.Jet Fa 229.700 23,534 206,166 24,000 2.Safety&Security Improvements r a.Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1&2,J-35 955.000 86.647 868,353 637,000 b.Confined Specs Personnel Retrieval System,J. 113,000 23.188 89,812 24,000 c.Fire Alarm&Security System Upgrade,J57 298,250 281,239 17,011 422,000 3.Support Facilities a.Enclose Open Bay at warehouse Storage,J-20 157.000 - 157,000 b.Collection Facilities Depot,J60-1 136,910 2270 134,640 2,300 Transfer to Project Below (2,023) - (2,023) - r Chlorine Bldg Mach Equip Demolition,J60 2.023 15,902 (13,879) 16,000 c.Infonnebon Technelog ies Trailer Addition,J-61 243,000 27.268 215,732 28,000 4.Utility Systems Improvements a.Electrical Power System Studies.J-254 439,000 361,243 T7,757 817,00D r b.Electrical Power System Studies,J-25-5 97,500 - 97.500 - c.Standby Power Reliability Modifns,J-33-1 947,000 178,740 768.260 979,000 d.Cable Tray lmprovemenla,J47 2,500.000 183.566 2,316,434 434,000 e.Impvr.To Central Generation Starting Air Syste 36,000 - 36,000 - - f.MdgOon of Gen.Gen.Waste Hest Boiler,J64 50,000 5,521 44.479 15,000 g.Gas Mixing Systems Improvements,J-88 208.000 9,005 198,995 19.000 r Section 3-Page 5 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 �1 1998-99 1998.99 1998-99 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Irrj Estimated Dueay @12J31198 Outlay Outlay 5. Flow Management&Reliability &Surge Tower Replacement J34-1 32,000 67,334 (35,334) 305,000 LI c.Wife[]Flow Meter Replacement J-66 90.000 - 90.000 - d. Peak Flow Maragement Projects,J-67 100,000 - 100,000 - 1 6.Miscellaneous Projects 69 a.Revision of Standard Specifications,J-44 150,000 65,803 64,197 186.000 b. Evaluation of Tunnels for Structural Integrity,J- 203,ODD 17.615 185,355 18,000 c.New Grit Augers,J-52 558,000 24277 533,723 145,000 I d.Maddm to Existing Mechanical System,J-62 143,000 - 143,000 70,000 u e.Turret Flooding Monitoring System,J-65 30,000 - 30.000 - f.Mechanical Seals on Ftgh Rate Digester lift 517,000 82.307 434.093 160.000 h.Joint Facilities Engineering 1,400,000 376,210 1,023,790 SBQ000 SubTatal -liderpiant&Joint 14,038.880 2,766.946 11.271,914 6,460,30D �1 Sub-Total - Major Projects 34,555,276 9,089,340 25,465,936 16,954,330 Special Projects V 1.Strategic&Master Raring a. Imrestigabon antl Rehab of Ocean Outfall,J39 390,000 99,966 290,034 285,000 In.Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,J-4 379.850 (149,899) 529.749 (10D,OOD) J c. Determ.Of Fin Charges and Fee Sc ed.,JAO-2 94,145 6.740 87,405 7,000 d.Treatment,Reuse aid Disposal Plan,J<0F3 862,0oo 202,509 449.491 578,OOD e.CEQA,Public Participation,J-40-4 514,000 44,337 469.863 295,001) f.Permit Pe l&Maintenance 50,O110 28,885 21.115 50.000 }tj g.Ram O&M Manual&S.O.P. Irtpm.Project 230,000 - 230,000 230,ODD 2. Into a6on Management&Computerization a.Air Quality Infortnotiat Mgmt.Sys. 180.000 39,038 140,962 180,000 j b.Automation Report Publishing 120,OD0 47,346 72,654 95,000 c.CMMS Programming 230.000 94,518 135,482 170.000 d. Data Integration 1.489,000 5M,702 897,298 1,489,000 e. Document ManagemarR 571,000 105,379 465,621 325.000 f.Financial Information System(m 450,ODO 1OZ395 287,605 45D.000 g.Geographic Information System 180,000 573 179,427 180,000 h. InMnet Application DwelopmeN 188.240 11,774 176.456 188,240 i. Intranet Application Development 91,81110 27281 64,339 91,e0D kr j. L.I.M.S. Implementation Phene 11 75.000 5,9U0 89,100 75,000 k. Network Badatone Upgrade Continuator, 579,040 62487 516,573 579,040 L Network Test Facility 105,000 13.M 91,741 105,000 m.Source Control Programnung 255,1100 90.708 154294 255,000 v n. Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 240,000 14,462 225,538 240,001) o.VaceVata Building Rewiring 221,050 40,794 180,266 221,080 I p.Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 111,980 - 111,980 111,980 4 q.Year 2000 Data Charge 185,000 654,083 (468.083) 1,800,000 3.Research&Developmem a.Acirmted Carbon Full Scale Evaluation 60.000 - 60,000 80.000 I 1 It.Bictrickling After Development&Demonstration 123,500 355 123,145 123,600 V c.Large Scale Miaofiltrabon Demonstration 55,500 28,113 27,387 55,50D d.Misc Optimization Studes&Improvements 210,0DO - 210,000 50,000 -ri e. Primary Effluent Fla2tion Large-Scale Test 207,OD 5Q 0 28,662 13W 207,000 f. Processes to Achieve Gass A Biceolids 117,000 630 116,370 117,OOD 4 Section 3-Page 6 L CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 199&99 1998-99 1998-99 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected Estimated Outlay Co112V31/98 Outlay Outlay 4. Utility Systems �+ a.Cen Gan Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 550.000 26,216 523,784 550.000 b.Can Gen Engine NOX 8 VOC Emission Eval 195,000 - 195,000 195,000 c.Kcmax Direct Steam Injection System 46,000 - 46,0DO 46,0DO d.Plam 1&2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 240,000 - 240.000 200,D00 - e.Plant Waxer Station Valve U -Upgrade 27,000 27,000 25,000 f. Upgrade Phone System 40.000 2,699 37,301 40.000 5. Prooass-Related Special Projects r a.H202 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 35,OW - 35.000 35,000 b. Prelim Corrosion Ass"Study for Collation 7ZOW - 72,000 72,ODO c.Headxwks Main Sever Pump Rehab 150,0W 70,804 79,196 100,ODO d. Headwoks Scrubber Seal Retrofit 10,000 - 10.000 10.000 e. Digesters Expansion Joint Replacement 76,000 - 75.000 75,DDO f. KADY Process for Digester Performance Imprv. 85,S00 - 85,80D 85,800 g. Repi Pn Clarifiers Fail Air W/D TreM,Coupli 32,000 - 32.WO 32,000 h.Clarifier Efficiency Impmvemems 100,000 - 100.000 - I. Belt Press Automation 175,000 - 175,000 40.000 j.Bets Press Drive Unit Replacement 50,000 - S0,000 - k. P-2 Sludge Girder ReplacementfRehab 224,ODO - 224,000 180,000 -' I. P-2 Sludge Une Expansion Joint RepVRehab 60,000 14.062 45,9W 60,OW m.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 415,000 23,926 391,074 415,ODO n.SaBur Monitoring for Combustion 101,000 43.916 57,084 101,ODO o. Upgrade Emission Modeling Testing System 22,000 1,380 20,620 22,000 - 6.Mscellarxxwa a. Replacement of Plant Process Equipmem 80,000 - 80,ODO 80,000 b. Wsadarams Reliability 8 Redund.Projects 50,0DO - 50,000 50,000 - Pit 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 35 335 (300) c.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 00.000 28,277 51,723 80,000 f.Security System Improvements 257,80D 2,489 255,311 257.800 Sub-Total-Spada)projects 11,528,535 2,464.059 9.084.476 11.265.540 Water Management Projects a. Grourdmter Replenishment System, J-36 776.000 36,837 738,163 775,000 b. Water Conservation Cooperative Projects 2D0,000 7,010 192,990 2W,OW - c.Coy lnfiftr4DNlnflow Caoperalne Projects 100,000 - 100,000 1D0,000 Sub-Total-Water Managemem projects 1,075,000 43,847 1,031,153 1,075,000 - Equipment hems 2,124,000 982,495 1,141,5W 2,000,000 Total Treatment 8 Disposal Projects 49,2B2,811 12,579,741 36,703,070 31,304,870 Construction in progress Completed at M0198 (163,029) 163.029 - Total Collections,Treatment and Disposal Pro 72,185,791 19,060,401 53,125,390 51.590,582 Section 3- Page 7 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 u Current Total Approved 6130198 Year Projected Rem alning j Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future ill Budget Cost Cost 0130099 Budget Collection system Improvement Projects Revenue Area I a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 7.494.500 - 67,000 67,000 7,427,500 b Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20.000 20.000 20,000 Revenue Area 1 Tom[ 7.514.500 87,000 $7.000 7.427.500 Revenue Area 2 Ilwl a Mods.To Newhope-Placentis Sewer 66.200 4.373 46,200 $0.573 15.027 I,Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer and Pump St. 2,194.D00 5.888 262.000 267,980 1.030.014 c Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief 16,572,000 - 100 100 16.671.900 I ' it Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 1,065.600 41,713 40,500 82,219 BB9,9B] y e IS Freeway Widening Project,2-36 - 140.800 102.093 4.000 106,093 34.707 I Pump Station Improvements(10%) 429,300 71.121 13,200 84,321 344,979 a Santa Ana River Intr.Shut OR Gate Rapt. 767,000 96.409 626,300 722,709 34,281 It Santa Ana River Intr.Realignment 8 Prot 11.864.000 13,527 162,000 175,627 11,688.473 1 Abandonment of Yeam Linda Pump Station 280.000 - - 2a0,000 j Replacement of Newhope Placentia Trunk 8.022.000 - - - 8.022.000 it Replacement of Cypress Ave.Subtrurk 7,180,000 - - - 7.180.000 I Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 Miscellaneous Projects 801000 BOA00 $0,000 Revenue Area 2 Total 48,67D,900 335.222 1,244,3110 1,579,522 47.091.378 Revenue Area 3 j , a Pump Station Improvements,(14%) 600,460 99,689 18,480 118,049 482.411 u b Modifications to Magnolta Relief Sawer 212,300 23.251 134,000 157,281 65.019 c Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3.11R 496,200 9,386 355,000 364,388 131.812 d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 6.327,400 373,521 2,108,500 2,482,021 2.845,379 al-S Freeway Widening,3.37 67.100 65,564 64,000 119,664 (52A64) 1 1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hlllstmm 0,312.000 346,761 163,500 529,261 5.782.739 YYYrrdll a Mlller-HOMer Improv., Imperial Hwy.,3.38-3 6.344.000 2.512.753 3,532,000 6.344,753 (753) h Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20,000 - 20.000 20,000 - 1 Miscellaneous Projects $0.000 - 809000 80,000 - Revenue Area 3Tout 10.469.480 3.719.837 8.495A80 10,216.317 9.244.143 Revenue Area 5 a Pump Station Improvements,(28%) 1.201.760 199.137 36,960 236,097 965.663 b Beautification of Bey Bridge Pump Station 80,000 12.386 68.000 80,386 (386) L c Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 1,207.900 230,851 904.510 1.135.361 72.439 d Relocation of Lido Pump Station 3,318,700 491,067 2.496.000 2.967,Da7 331.613 a Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilabdon 2,245.100 - 62.700 62.700 2.182,400 f Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 30.000 - 30.000 30.000 - g Miscellaneous Projects 120.000 120,000 1201000 M Revenue Area 6 Total 8,203,360 933.461 3.718.170 4.651.631 3.551.729 Revenue Area 6 a Pump Station Improvements,(6%) 257.520 42,673 7.920 50,693 206.927 YYYPPP b Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 874.480 318.795 654.990 073,786 (99.305) c Fairview Relief Sewer 3.138.300 389.185 2,316.000 2,7059 185 433116 } all Watson Avenue I California St.Sewer 2,176.000 83.508 43,212 126.720 2,049:280 e Old'Dishid B Trunk'Parallel 1,719.000 - - - 1.719.000 V r Dover Drive Parallel Sewer 1.093.000 - - - 1,603,DOD g Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 5.000 - 5.000 5.000 - a Miscellaneous Projects 20.000 - 20,000 20,000 - Revenue Area B Total 10.083.300 834,161 3.047.122 3,881,20 61202.017 V III Ll Section 3—Page 8 L as CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Current Total Approved 9I30198 Year Projected Remaining aw Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Coat Coat 6130I99 Budget a4 Revenue Area 7 a Pump Satlon Improvements,(33%) 1,416,360 23,260 43,560 66,820 113491540 b Improvements to Mein St.P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 1.088,680 798,542 428,120 1,226,662 (139,982) c Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment 216.000 - - - 215.000 ,r d Covey Lane Pump Station Abandonment 210.000 - - 210,000 e Orange Park Acres Trunk Replacement 1,685,200 80.106 1.663,000 1.723.108 (37,906) f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 491.000 - 134.000 134,000 357,000 9 College Ave.Pump Station Parallel Force 1.877.000 60.354 4.600 64.954 1,812,046 h Armstrong Subbunk Sewer 7,016,000 12,862 125,000 137.862 0.876.338 aw i -B'Street 8 Michell SL Sewer Replacement 395.000 11611 273,000 274,811 120,189 1 Gialer Red Hill Trunk Relocation 5,006,000 - 49,000 49,000 6.867,000 k Miscellaneous Repair of Lose l Sewers 2,291.000 - 574,000 574,000 1,717,000 ,..I Miscellaneous Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 10.000 10.000 - Mlscellaneous Projects 40,000 40,000 40,000 Revenue Area 7 Total 22,639,240 056.736 3,344,280 4,301,016 18,336,225 we Revenue Area 11 a Pump Station Improvements,(9%) 306.280 5.343 11.880 18,223 368,057 b G ildenweat St Sewer Replacement 491,700 161,276 27,000 206.278 283,422 c Goldenwast SL Trunk Sewer Replacement 3,920.400 2.384 268,000 266,384 3.652.016 we d Wamer Avenue Pump Station 1,391,000 104.862 11,100 115,762 1,275,238 e Hell Interceptor 4,072,900 2,336 275,000 277,336 3,795,564 f Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 2.053.640 190,000 190,000 1,863,640 9 Huntington Beach Sower 8 Abandonment 370,000 294 264,000 264,294 105,706 h Frame,Cover and Coaling Rehab. 10.000 - 10,000 10,000 - aw i Miscellaneous Projects 140.000 40,000 40,000 100.000 Revenue Ana I Total 12.836.920 297,297 1,094,980 1,302.277 11,443,643 aw Revenue Ayes 13 a Capacity in Euclid Interceptor 2,661,600 - - - 2.801.600 I,Capacity in Carbon Canyon Interceptor 5,845,148 - 23,000 23,000 5,822,148 c Capacity in Rlch4old Trunk 36,968 - - - 36,968 we d Capacity in Kellogg Trunk 23,852 - - - 23,852 a Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 44,942 - 700 700 44,242 f Capacity in Senate Ana River Interceptor 5,884,303 - 93,400 03,400 5.790.993 g Capacity in South River Interceptor 935,918 - 14,600 14,500 921.418 we It Capacity In New Taft Interceptor 296.679 - 11,900 11,900 284.779 i Capacity In Orange Perk Acres Sewer 4.225.924 4,225.924 Revenue Ana 13 Total 1Q955,424 143,500 143,500 19,811.924 vr' Revenue Area 14 a Improvements to Main St.P.S.,7-7-1 (72%) 2,794,320 2,053,393 1,100,880 3,154,273 (359.953) b Frame,Cover and Causes Rehab, 10,000 10,000 10.000 Revenue Area 14 Total 2,804.320 2.053.393 1,110.880 3,164.273 (359,953) wa Collection System CIP Total 152,166,424 9,130.106 20,285,712 29,415,818 122.70.606 aw we we Section 3-Page 9 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Current Total Approved 6/30198 veer Projected Remaining L Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Coat Cost e130199 Budget Reclamation Plant No.1 1.Peliminary Treatment VI a. Headwork.No.2 Control System Upgrade,J41 1.546.000 1.178,570 450,ODD 1.625.570 (62,570) b. Headwork.Rehab/Relerbishment 3,000,000 - - - 3.000,000 c.Sunfiower P.S.Drive Replacement,P"2 326,000 - - - 326.000 2.Primary Treatment a.Primary Effluent Pumping Automation 06,000 - - 95,000 � b.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,PI-37 62.127,000 307.330 1,226.000 1.533.339 80,5931661 c.Prim Clarifiere 3.4 8 5 Rehab, P141 1,845,000 1.504,313 169.030 1.673,343 171.657 it.Adv.Primary Polymer Botching PLC Progm. 109,500 - - - 109.500 3.Secondary Treatment 4 e.Sec.Trent Process Rehab/Refurbishment 5.600,000 - - - 6.500,000 b.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 60 MOD,Pt 40.600,000 38,324,250 1.378,000 39,702,258 1.097.742 c.Diets Modifications at Activated Sludge Plant.P 123,000 4,205 1,000 5,205 117.795 4.Solids Handling 6 Dewatering V a.Digestion 6 Dewatering Rehab/Rafurbiahment SA001000 - - - 8,600.000 b.Automation of Solids Storage Fec. P"O a98,o00 4,318 56,00D 60,316 637,664 S.Utility System$ •I a.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods., P1 2,686,100 2,513,707 685.000 3,158,707 (513.007) 11rr1. b.Elect.Facility ModiMe B Safety Upgmdea,P14 095,000 201,583 60,000 281,563 813.417 Transfer to Project Belot, (12,600) - - - (12,500) Alarm Seasons for Venting of Ga.Holder 12,60D - 1.000 1,000 11,Soo c.Fee Meddle S Safety Upgrades,P140.2 1,665,000 1.550.290 15.000 1,68B,2Sa 98,702 d.Ominage Improv.At Plant 1,P140.3 220,000 12,783 227.000 239,763 (1S,7a3) a.Plant Utilities RehablRefurbishment 500,000 - - 500.000 /.Chemical Facility Mothers,P146.2 3,496,00D 516,443 51,000 567,443 2,928.557 e.Cho Refueling Station,P141 1,402,609 1.042.931 490.000 1.532,931 (130.322) S.Safety Improvements u a.Selmic Retrofit of Non-Stmctu s Systems,P14 1,446,000 1,208,039 77,000 1,286,039 160,961 b.Seismic Recent Strucfual Items,P144 2.690,000 110,542 11,000 121.542 2.468.455 c.Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures, P1444 1,229,000 2,370,276 224,000 2,594,276 (1,385'278) 7.Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects L. a.Landscaping Project for Undeveloped Area 33,000 - 2,000 2,000 31,000 b.Replace Air Conditioning Units @ Warehouse 35.000 - - 35.000 _ c.Rep!Six Gas Filed Ceiling Heat..®Float 20.000 - - - 20,000 d.Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters @ B 29.000 - - - 29,000 1 e.Waste Side Stream Automation 50,000 60,000 $0.000 YYYrrill /.Allowance for Planned Smell Projects 41,800,ODO 58,625 443,000 601,825 41.298.375 Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 184.285,209 50,908,228 5.837,030 66,646,258 127.719.951 Treatment Plant No.2 u 1.Preliminary Treatment a. Headverks Improvements®Plant 2,P246 14,708,000 15,191 21.000 36,191 14,671.009 a.1 Replacement of Bertelsen Influent Gate,P24 - 5.032 - 6.032 (5,032) b.Improvements to Influent Sampling System,P2- 70,000 - - - 70,000 'IL 2.Primary Treatment a.Primary Treatment RehablRefurbishment 9,618,000 - - - 9,618,000 b.Primary Clarifier Rehab, P248 5.637,000 4,076.330 335,000 5.311.330 325,670 3.Secondary Treatment e.D.A.F.Thickener Surface Skim.Sup.Rails 65,000 - - - 65.000 b.Rehab of Secondary Facilities,P2-74 6,841,000 - - - 6.641.000 Y1 y Section 3-Page 10 I W wo CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life ow For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Current Tolel r Approved 6130m8 Year Projected Financial., Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cast 8130199 Budget 4.Solids Handling A Dewatermg a.Conveyor Bait Repl.-Solids Storage Loading 75.000 - 40.000 40.000 35.000 as, b.Dewatedng Be8 Press Rebuild 825,000 - 150.000 150,000 675,0a0 C.Digestion A Deenatedng Rehab/Refurbishment 7,800,000 - - - 7,800,000 d.Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 21,000,000 886,515 342.00D 1.228,515 19.771,4115 e.TWAS Feed to Digesters F 8 G.P2-39-1 200,000 84,571 116.O0D 200.571 (571) val f.Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P2-60 9,993,OD0 96,901 683,000 779,901 9.213.090 S.Utility Systems a.Digester Gas Flats Control System Upgrade.P2 154.000 - - - 154,001) b.Plant Utilities Rehab/Reforbiahment 1.000.000 - - - 1,000,000 c.Modify Fire Processed,Signs 8 Water By., P24 3.763.000 3,410,294 585.000 3.996.294 (232.294) as d.Fire A Water Sys Mugged.P246-2 200,000 172,752 11.000 183.752 16.248 e.Elect Fee Machine A Safety Upgraded,P247-1 4,400.000 502.446 483,000 965.446 3,434,554 I.Chemical and Plant Water Medians.P2-55 4,200.000 4.164.538 264.000 4.428,538 (228.536) g.Air Compressors for Plant Air System,P241 560.000 1.935 70.000 80,935 479.065 we h.Gas Compressor Redundancy, P2-79 $26.000 - - - 526,000 S.Safety Improvements a.Phase II Site S Security Imp.,P2-35-5 1,456,632 1,337,385 119,000 1.456,385 (753) b.Seimle Robert of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 1,811,000 1,297,851 217.000 1,514,851 296,149 C.Seismic Retrofit.Structural Items P2-53-2 4,424,000 4,176,007 14,000 4.190.007 233.993 ass d.Rehab Tunnel Lighting System, P2-78 279,000 - - - 279.000 T.Miscellaneous A Support Projects a.Maintenance Building.P2-35-3 A-1 9.356.000 6,790AS4 344,000 7.134,864 2,223,136 b.Warehouse Building,P2-65 1,330,000 108,106 671,000 779,106 560.894 we c.Fee Moultrie A Safety Upgrades,P247-2 1.630,000 1,468,586 98.000 1,666.686 63.414 d.Replace Air Conditioning®Liquid Oxygen Re 21,000 - - - 21.000 a.Replace Air CondiBoning 0 Oper Center 22,000 - - - 22.000 I.Replace Exhaust Fans®Operation.Center 12.100 - - - 12.100 g.Replace Existun Supply A Return Duckwork 30,000 - - - 30.000 wo h.Plant 2 Fec8lis.gagman., 41,800,000 192,736 315.000 507.736 41.292.264 Sub-Total -Treatment Plant2 153.807,732 29.688,038 4,667.000 34,555,038 119.252.694 Insentient and Joint Facilities sal 1.Plant Automation B Computerization a.Computerized Fee.Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25 4,605,000 725,741 151,000 a76,741 3.728.259 b.SOc.Treatment Mo.It 6 Cbl Sysfom Upgrade,J 11816.000 221.420 99.000 320,420 1.605.500 c.Power Monbodea and Control Strom..,J-33-3 4,033.000 - - 4,033,000 as, d.Plant Reirvenlion/AutomaOon Project.J42 25,760.000 319.882 1.106.000 1.425.882 24,334,118 e.Cons.Of Modbu.•Data Hwys to Ring Cdefi, 210.000 - 43.000 43,000 167,000 I.Fiber Optic Upgrades 660,000 - 109.000 109.000 651XI) g.SCADA Administration Sofwere Improvement 150.000 - 120.000 120,000 30,000 h.Stdz Plant 1A2 Field Fiber Optic Term.Jet Fa 324,700 - 24.000 24,000 300,700 we 2.Safety A Security Improvements a.Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1 8 2,J-35- 1,000,000 53.810 637,000 690,810 309.190 b.Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J4 352,000 - 24,000 24,000 328.000 c.Fire Alarm A Security System Upgrade,J-57 560AINO 156,861 422.000 578.861 (18.861) ass 3.Support Facilities a.Endless Open Bay at warehouse Storage,J-20- 175.000 28.031 - 28.031 146,969 b.Collection Facilities Depot,340-1 846,000 - 2,300 2,300 843,700 Transfer to Project Below (136,910) - - - (136.910) ead Chlorine Bldg Mech Equip Demolition.J-60 136.010 - 16,000 16.000 120.910 c.Information Technologies Trailer Addition,J-51 243.000 - 28,000 28,000 215.D00 d.Building Rehab/Refurbishment 1,455.000 - - - 1.455.1100 war ass ow Section 3-Page 11 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 LLL Current Total Approved 6130198 Year Projected Remaining L Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Coat Cost 6130199 Budget 4.Utility System.Improvements a.Electrical Power System Studies,J-254 3.171,000 148.631 017.000 963.631 2207369 to Electrical Power System Studio.,J-25-5 3,3118,000 - - - 3:300:000 V c.Standby Power Reliability Madded,J-33-1 17.206.000 735,879 979.000 1,714.879 15,491,121 all.Coble Tray Improvements.J47 12.750,000 86,174 434.000 529,174 12.220,826 e.Impvr.To Centel Generation Starling Air System 136,000 - - - 136,000 j f.Magellan of Can.Gen.Waste Heat Boiler,J44 200,000 - 15.000 15.000 186,000 L g.Gas Mixing Systems Improvements,J45 497.000 442 19,000 19,442 477,558 h.Electrical Facilities Relate Refurtemi nt 6,670.000 - - - 6.670.000 S.Flow Management&Reliability I a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-M-1 8.259.106 7.953,617 305,000 8,259,817 (511) IYsII b.Foster OuNall Pumping Station Rehab,J59 13,040,000 - - - 13.040.000 c.Oufell Flow Meter Replacement,J-06 924.000 - - 924.000 _ d.Peak Flow Management Projects,J47 3,640,000 - - - 3,640.000 S.Miscellaneous Project a.Revision of Standard Specifications,J44 341,000 36,122 188,000 202,122 135.678 V to Evaluation of Tunnel.for Structural Integrity,J-5 236.000 10.700 10,000 28,700 207,300 c.Now Grit Augers,J42 S8D,000 - 146,000 145,000 415,000 d.Moddes to Existing Mechanical System,J42 1.473.000 - 70,000 70,000 1,403,000 e.Tunnel Flooding Monitoring System,J45 150.000 - - - 100,000 L f.Mschenimil Seals on High Rate Digester Mix 517,000 - 150,000 150,000 367.000 g.Odor Control Process RehablRefurbishment 1,800,000 - - 1,800,000 h.Joint Facilities Engineering 30,800,000 245.904 660,000 $05,904 20,994.090 flub-Total -Intendant B Joint 148,057.606 10,730,214 6.460,300 17,100.514 130,887,292 u Bub-Total - Major Projects 486,130.747 91.326,480 16,904,330 108,290,810 37748391937 'l Special Projects lal 1.Strategic S Master Planning a.Investigation and Rehab of Oman Ouffi J-39 1.439,600 759,201 285.000 1.044.201 395.309 _ b.Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,J40 2.646,350 2,SS4,178 (100.000) 2,454,178 192,172 a.Determ.Of Fin Charges and Fee Schad.,J40-2 604,145 670,860 7.000 885,850 8,298 d.Treatment.Reuse and Disposal Pan.J40-3 1,402.000 1,251,474 578,000 1,829,474 (387,474) Yrl e.CEQA,Public Participation,J404 682,000 162.707 296,000 457,707 224.293 L Permit Renewal&Maintenance 50,000 696,078 50,000 748,078 (606,078) g.Plant O&M Manual&S.O.P.Improv.Project 230.000 - 230.000 230,000 - ^� 2.Information Management&Compulerixaaon ad a.Air Quality Information Marti.Sys. 250,OOD 44,934 180.000 224,034 26,086 b.Automation Report Publishing 195.000 - 95,000 96,000 100,000 - c.CMMSProgramming 490,000 104,168 170,000 274,166 215834 l d.Dale Integration 4,334.000 265,262 1.489.000 1.764,262 2,579:736 L e.Document Management $00,000 37,434 326.000 362,434 437,668 f.Financial Information System(IT) 2,475,000 1.988.157 450,000 2,436,157 38.843 _ g.Geographic Information System 074,000 - 180.000 160,000 604,000 In. Internet Application Development 362,240 39.351 168,240 227.591 154,649 I4, L Intranet Application Development 235,600 35.416 91,600 127,416 108,184 J. L.I.M.S. Implementation Phase II 505,600 380,956 75.000 466,958 49.042 k. Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 1.439.040 490,507 579,040 1,069,547 369.403 I.Nsthem,Test Facility 125.000 - 105,000 105.000 20,000 m.Source Cenral Programming 576.000 147,745 255,000 402,745 173.255 n.Strategic Information Archneclure(SIA) 724,000 189.621 240.000 429,621 294,379 o.VOIcelData Building Rewiring 570.080 202,692 221,080 513,672 56,408 p.Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 111,980 - 111.980 111,9a0 - I a.Year 2000 Data Change 2,141,500 35,709 1,800,000 1.836,709 305,791 � L L Section 3-Page 12 - L we CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Current Total Approved 6130198 Year Projected Rama let., Project Accumulated Projected Costal, Future Budget Cost Cost 6130199 Budget 3.Research&Development a.Activated Carbon Full Scala Evaluation 60,000 - 60,000 $0.000 - ud b.Biotnckling Filter Development&Demenstm5on 123.500 - 123.500 123.500 - a.Large Scale Mlcroflltratlon Demonstration 96,500 46,225 55.500 102225 (5,725) d.Miss Optimization Studies&Improvements 430.000 44,222 50,000 94222 335,778 e.Primary Effluent Flatness Large-Smile Test 349,13 D0 195,301 207,000 402,301 (53.301) f.Processes Is Achieve Class A MosdMd 127,000 314 117.000 117,314 9.686 4.Utility Systems a.Gen Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 560.000 42,590 550.000 592,690 (32.500) b.Can Gen Engine NOx&VOC Emission Eval 195,000 - 195,0D0 196,000 - c.Komax Direct Steam Injection System 46.000 - 46,000 46.000 - ded d.Plant 1 &2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 440,000 8,548 200,000 208.648 231,452 e.Plant Water Station Valve Upgrade 27,000 - 25,000 25.000 2.000 I.Upgrade Phone System 78,000 230,021 40,000 270,021 (192,021) S.Proaeae-Related Special Projects we a.H2O2 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 40,000 - 35.000 35,000 51000 Transfer to Project Below (39205) - - - (39,205) 1113O2 Continuous Monilor/Pretreatment Automa 39205 - - - 39,206 b.Prelim Corrosion Assmt Study for Collection 107,000 - 72.000 72,000 35,000 we e.Headworks Mein Sewer Pump Rehab 300,000 - 100,000 1D0,000 200.000 d.Headworks Scrubber Seal patent 10,000 - 10,000 10.000 - a.Digesters Expansion Joint Replacement 75,000 - 75,000 75,000 - f.KADY Process for Digester Performance Imam. 90,800 - 85,900 85,800 6,000 g.Real Pa Germans Foul Air WAD Trans.Coupli 32,000 - 32,000 32,000 - aw, h.Cleafler Efficiency Improvements 1,700,000 - - - 1.700.000 I.Bab Phase Automation 175.000 - 40.000 40.000 136,000 j.Belt Press Drive Unit Replacement 50.000 - - - SO,000 k. P-2 Sludge Gander ReplecemenVRehab 224,000 - 180,000 18D,000 44,000 ar I. P-2 Sludge Line Expansion Joint ReaORahes 60.000 - 60,001) 60.000 - m.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 686A00 58,476 416,000 473,476 211.524 n.Sufur Monitoring for Combustion 126,000 30,609 101,000 131.809 (5,809) a.Upgrade Emission Modeling Teeing System 52.000 27,955 22,000 49.955 2.045 ,r S.Miscellaneous a.Replacement of Plant Process Equipment 1,760,000 - 60,000 80,000 1.68D.000 b.Miscellaneous Reliability&Redund.Projects 250,000 18.960 50,000 68.960 181.040 Transferee Projects Below (152,666) - - - (152.888) Energy Deregulation Study 57,268 530 - 639 56.729 sw Pit 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 95,600 71,692 - 77,692 17.908 c.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 80.000 - 80,000 80,000 I.Securiy System Improvements 784,800 130.592 257,800 386,392 396,408 r✓ Sub-Total-Special Projects 32,566.135 11.065,284 11,265.540 22.330,824 10.235.311 Water Management Projects a.Groundwater Replenishment System, J-36 121.925.000 641,012 775,000 1,316.012 120.608.968 b.Water Conservallon CooparalNe Projects 1.000.000 - 200,000 200,000 800.000 v✓ c.City lnfiltrationfinflow Cooperative Projects 205,100,000 100,000 i(XIA00 205,000,001) Sub-Total-Water Management Projects 328,025,000 541.012 1,O75,000 1,616.012 326,408,9s8 Equipment lbms 44,124,000 2.111.161 2,000,000 4,111,1 s1 70 012,639 Total Treatment&chip osal Projects 890,845.682 105,043,937 31,304.870 136,348,507 764,497,075 r Construction in Progress Completed at 6130198 - 59,644,199 - 59,814,189 (59,6O4,199) Projects To Be Identified in Strategic Plan 526.000,000 526,000,000 Taut Collections,Treatment and Disposal Projects 1.569.012.306 173,818,242 51,590.662 225.403,524 1.343.603,482 sr cad Section 3-Page 13 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L L L L L Li V This Page Left Intentionally Blank L. IJ L L L L L L L Section 3—Page 14 L Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review r For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 �+ Operating Budget Review 1998.99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date r Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53.99% r Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 30,816,000 14,399,532 16,415,488 46.73% Connection Fees 6,800,000 2,726,139 4,073,861 40.09% IRWD Fees - - - - Other Fees 73,795,000 33,296,624 40,498,376 45.12% r Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50,000 - Interest&Misc.Receipts 20,648,000 14,709,694 5,938,306 71.24% Other - 468,492 (468,492) - r Total Revenues 132,118,000 65,605,880 66,512,120 49.66% OUTLAYS: r Share of Joint Works Tmit Plant 49,284,000 12,416,712 36,867,288 25.19% District Trunk Sewer Construction 22,904,000 6,643.689 16,260,311 29.01% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 30,444,000 20,976,834 9,467,166 68.90% r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45,20D,DD0 20,272,351 24,927,549 44.85% District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,279.500 2,965.216 6,314,284 31.95% Total Outlays 157,111,500 63.274,802 93.536,596 40.27% r Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: r Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 34,705,356 6,643,689 (25,575,260) 15,773,795 Share of Joint Works 150,440,836 12,416,712 (7,406,143) 155,451,405 r Sub-Total 185,146,192 19,060,401 (32,981,393) 171,225,200 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: yy Land and Property Rights 2,675,266 - - 2,676,266 Collection Lines and Pump She. 307,096.988 (14,651.800) - 292,545,188 Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,922 Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528 r General Plant and Admin. Facil. 585,732 - - 885,732 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 674,866,556 (304,452) 7,406,143 681,968,247 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 79,646 (36,954) - 42,692 Sub-Total 985,715,638 (14,893,206) 7,406,143 978,228,575 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,170,861,830 4,167,195 (25,575,250) 1,149,453,775 r r Section 4-Page 1 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Revenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Operating Budget Review L 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended 6W REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Ony) - - - - Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,976,000 1,123,338 852,662 56.85% Connection Fees 500.000 189,180 310,820 37.84% Other Fees 7,764,000 3.262,703 4.501,297 42.02% 1 � Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - �r Interest BMisc. Receipts 1,D41,000 757,955 283,045 72,81% Other - 50,742 (50,742) - Total Revenues 11.281.000 5,383,918 5,897.082 47.73% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt.Plant 5,431,000 1,355,906 4,075,094 24.97% Li District Trunk Sewer Construction 87,000 - 87,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,958,000 2,675,732 1,282.268 67.60% ' Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 6.040,000 2,173,196 2,886,804 43.12% l� District Operating 8 Other Expenditures 593.000 244.388 348.612 41.21% Total Outlays 15,109,000 6,449,222 8,659,778 42.68% V Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance y 7/1/98 8 Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98 Construction in Progress - _ _ - jy Share of Joint Works 16,428,139 1.355,906 - 17,784,045 Sub-Total 16,428,139 1,355,906 - 17784045 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: - Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81.398 Collection Lines and Pump Sens. 8,903,000 - - 6.903.000 Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 58,241 - - 58,241 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 73,837R97 (205,173) - 73,632,124 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - _ _ V Sub-Total 80,891,529 (205.173) - 80,686,356 Total Property,Plant 8 Equipment&CIP 97,319,888 1,150,733 - 98,470,401 L,I Section 4-Page 2 _ L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1997.98 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - - Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 9,575.000 4.706.926 4,868.074 49.16% Connection Fees 2,500,000 557,077 1,912,923 23.48% Other Fees 23,973.000 10,253,521 13,719,479 42.77% _ Sale of Capacity Rights - - - Interest&Misc. Receipts 5,958,000 4,304,786 1,653,214 72.25% Other - 139.402 (139,402) - Total Revenues 42,006, 0 19.991,712 22.014.288 47.59% — OUTLAYS: 00 Share of Joint Works Trml Plant 14,624,000 3,634,372 10,889.628 25.02% — District Trunk Sevrer Construction 2,131,000 622,074 1,508,926 29.19% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10.302,000 7,132,682 3,169,338 69.24% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 14,370,000 6,329,028 8,040,972 44.04% r District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,775,OD0 846,610 1,928,390 30.51% Total Outlays 44,102,000 18,554,746 25.537.254 4210% �. Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98 — Construction in Progress 631.047 622,074 (295,825) 957,296 - _ Share of Joint Works 44,034,032 3.634,372 - 47.668,404 Sub-Total 44,665,079 4,256,446 (295,825) 48,625,700 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: r Collection Lines and Pump Stuns. 97,076,157 (175,500) - 96,900.657 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172 ,- General Plant and Admin. Facil. 218,549 - - 218.549 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 197,506,072 (141.440) - 197,364.632 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 14.089 (14,089) - - - Sub-Total 295,365,733 (331,029) - 295,034,704 Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 340,030,812 3,925,417 (295,825) 343,880,404 Section 4-Page 3 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Revenue Area No. 3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date I Budget Date Budget % Expended u REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - Tax AllocalionslSubventions(Share of 1%) 10,313,000 4,081,667 6,231,333 39.58% Ir Connection Fees 1,800,000 903,383 896,617 50.19% Other Fees 23,326,000 11,062,595 12,263,405 47A3% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - 1d Interest&Misc.Receipts 6,888,000 4,828,911 2,059,089 70.11% Other - 141,921 (141,921) - v Total Revenues 42,327,000 21,018,477 21,308,523 49.66% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 14,923,D00 3,794,547 11,128,453 25.43% District Trunk Sewer Construction 6,977,D00 3,003,970 3,973.030 43.06% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 9,469,000 6,420,187 3,048,813 67.80% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,085,0D0 6,055,351 7,029,649 46.28% L District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,365,000 600,752 1,764,248 25.40% Total Outlays 46,819,000 19,874,807 26,944,193 42.45% V Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131/98 1J Construction in Progress 14,901,704 3,003,970 (11,181,867) 6,723,807 L Share of Joint Works 45,974,719 3,794,547 - 49,769,266 Sub-Total 60,876,423 6,798,517 (11,181,867) 56,493,073 Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 74,414,552 (11,090,600) - 63,323,952 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 320,153 - - 320,153 Equity in Joint Treatment Fact]. 206,177,386 (116,466) - 206,061,920 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - Sub-Total 281,230,663 (11,206,066) - 270,024,597 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 342,107,086 (4,407,549) (11,181,867) 326,517,670 �r L Section 4-Page 4 iV L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 r Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year To- Remaining Year-To-Date ` Budget Data Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - .n Tax Alkwallons/Subventicns(Sham of 1%) 2,612,000 1,353,829 1.258,171 51.83% Connector,Fees 500,000 80,658 419,342 16.13% Other Fees 2.730,000 1,296,708 1.433.292 47.50% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest 8 Misc. Receipts 1,642,0D0 1,185,344 456.656 72A9% Other - 18,715 (18,715) - Total Revenues 7,484,000 3,935,254 3,548,746 52.58% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tmnt Plant 2,006,000 500,393 1,505,607 24.94% ` District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,079,0D0 1,130.371 2,948,629 27.71% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,789,0D0 1,322,484 466,516 73.92% Share or Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,844,0110 812,921 1,031,079 44.08% District Operating 8 Other Expenditures 864,500 289,432 575,068 33.48% Total Outlays 10,582.500 4,055.601 6,526,899 38.32% ,�. Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711198 BAdditions Fixed Assets 12131198 r Construction in Progress 1,861,682 1,130,371 (928.221) 2.063.832 Share of Joint Works 6,062,766 500,393 - 6,563,159 Sub-Total 7,924,448 1,630,764 (928,221) 8,626,991 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 8 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69,740 Collection Lures and Pump Bins. 34,300,512 (109,500) - 34,191,012 Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 39,402 - - 39.402 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 27,219,658 (45,907) - 27,173,751 Other Asset:at Coat Less Amort. - - - - r Sub-Total 61,643,774 (155,407) - 61,488,367 Total Property,Plant 8 Equipment 8 CIP 69.568,222 1,475,357 (928.221) 70,115,358 r ,.d Section 4-Page 5 1998-99 Mid-Year Report Revenue Area No. 6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review i For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Operating Budget Review v 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Vear•To-0ata Budget Date Budget %Expended L REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - - TaxAllocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,194,000 619,447 674,553 51.88% I Connection Fees 100,000 14,200 85,800 14.20% No Other Fees 3,686,000 1,831,390 1,754.610 51.07% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Imerest&Misc. Receipts 1,219,000 897,137 321,863 73.60% Other - 17,699 (17,899) - Total Revenues 6,099,000 3,379,873 2.719.127 55.42% 1 OUTLAYS: V Share of Joint Works Tmit Plant 1,838,000 480,660 1,3T7,340 25.060% District Trunk Sewer Construction 3,101.000 17,180 3.083.820 0.55% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,135,000 789,759 345,241 69.58% I I Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,550,000 786,567 763.433 50.75% District Operating&Other Expenditures 226,500 105,419 121,081 46.54% Total Outlays 7,85Q500 2.159.585 5,690.915 27.51% L Capital Facilities Budget Review - I Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance r 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/98 Construction in Progress 3.192.091 17,180 (2,357.930) 851.341 LI Share of Joint Works 5,581,355 460,660 - 6,042,015 Sub-Total 8,T73,446 477.840 (2,357,930) 6,893,356 'y COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562 Collector,Lines and Pump Sims. 5,157,361 (3,600) - 5.153,761 V Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2,653 Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 113,761 - - 113.761 Equity in Joint Tnatrnem Facil. 24.911,510 104,569 - 25,016.079 V Other Assets at Cost Less Amon - _ _ _ Sub-Total 30,193,241 100,969 - 30,294,210 i V Total Property,Plan&Equipment&CIP 38,966,687 578,809 (2,357,930) 37.187,566 _ Li i Li L Section 4 - Page 6 V Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dale r Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - ,r Tax ASocationsrSubventions(Share of l%) 2,980,000 1,458,385 1,521,615 48.94% Connection Fees 500,000 452,612 47,388 90.62% Other Fees 7,426,00D 2,983,943 4.442,057 40.18% ,r Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,593,000 1,024,303 568,697 64.30% Other - 46,580 (46,580) - r, Total Revenues 12,499,000 5,965,823 6,533,177 47.73% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 4,854,000 1.245,396 3,608,604 25.66% r District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,065,000 1,204,659 2,860,341 29.63% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,974,000 1,411,832 562,168 71.52% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,714,000 2,066,753 2,648,247 43.82% r District Operating&Other Expenditures 1,504,500 476,880 1,027,620 31.70% Total Outlays 17,111,500 6,404,520 10,706,980 37.43% Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711/98 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131/98 r Construction in Progress 4,361,999 1,204,659 (3,405,264) 2,161,394 Share of Joint Works 15,089,216 1,245,396 - 16,334,612 r Sub-Total 19,461,215 2,450,055 (3,405,264) 18,496,006 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: - r Land and Property Rights 1,578,655 - - 1,578,655 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 41,514,588 (3,128.200) - 38,386,388 Treatment Facilities - - - - ,� General Plant and Admin. Facil. 98,197 - - 98,197 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 67,975,501 (344,491) - 67,631,010 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 65,557 (22,865) - 42,692 Sub-Total 111,243.280 (3,495,556) - 107,747,724 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 130.694.495 (1,045,501) (3,405,264) 126,243.730 r Section 4- Page 7 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 � I Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended r REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53,99% Tax Allocations/Subvenoons(Sham of l%) 2,165,000 1,055,940 1.109.060 48.77% I.i Connection Fees 500,000 97,711 4OZ289 19.54% Other Fees 4,164,000 2,108,322 2,055.678 50.63% 1 , Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50.000 - Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,299,000 967,223 331.777 74.46% Other - 32,349 (32,349) - Total Revenues 8,188,000 4,266,944 3,921,056 52.11 OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 3,470,000 861.720 2,608,280 24.83% 161 District Tnmk Sewer Construction 1,388,D00 157,948 1230,052 11.38% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,645.000 1,133.653 511,347 68.92% 1 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,938,000 1246,750 1,691,250 42.44% V District Operating&Other Expenditures 715,500 331206 384,294 46.29% Total Outlays 10,158,SW 3,731277 6,425,223 36.74% Yr Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 1 7/1198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131198 V Construction in Progress 7,703,440 157,948 (7,406,143) 455,245 It Ld Share of Joint Works 10,440,594 861,720 (7,406,143) 3,896,171 Sub-Total 18,144,034 1,019,668 (14,812,286) 4,351,416 V COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Lard and Pmperty Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 Collection Lines and Pump Suns. 19,094,427 (44,400) - 19,050,027 LJ Treatment Facilities - _ _ - Disposal Faclities 3,053 - - 3,053 Generel Plant and Admin. Fact. 30,682 - - 30,682 IJ Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 46,880,113 (84,667) 7,406,143 54,201,589 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - _ - Sub-Total 66,155,261 (129,067) 7,406,143 73,432,337 �+ Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 84,299,295 890,601 (7,406.143) 77,783,763 I ' U L Section 4-Page 8 J L.I -- Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 r Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - '� Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) - - - - Connection Fees 400,000 401,318 (1,318) 100.33% Other Fees 826,000 495,852 330,148 60.03% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Misc. Receipts 598,000 442,596 155.404 74.01% Other - 5,294 (5,294) - Total Revenues 1,824,000 1,345,060 478,940 73.74% OUTLAYS: r Share of Joint Works Tent.Plant 562,000 141,651 420,449 25.19% District Trunk Sewer Construction 144,000 - 144,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 19,000 13.153 5,847 69.23% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 506,000 241,241 264,759 47.68% District Operating&Other Expenditures 24,000 2,559 21,441 10.66% Total Outlays 1,255.000 398,504 856,496 31.75% r Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31198 r Sham of Joint Works 1,715,026 141,551 - 1,856,577 Sub-Total 1,715,026 141,551 - 1,856,577 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 3,033,024 - - 3,033,824 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - - `� Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 7,709,858 (22,159) - 7,687,699 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - „� Sub-Total 10,743,682 (22,159) - 10,721,523 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 12,458,708 119.392 - 12,578,100 r Section 4-Page 9 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 II Operating Budget Review W 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year40-0ate i Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - TaxAllocations/Subventions(Share of l%) - - - - LI IRWD Fees - - -Other Fees - 1,590 (1,590) - Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Misc. Receipts 410,000 301,439 108,561 73.52% Other - 15,790 (15,790) - Total Revenues 410,000 318,819 91,181 77.76% L OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,676.000 422,168 1,253,832 25.19% I District Trunk Sewer Construction 932,000 507.487 424.513 54.45% U COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 153,000 77,372 75,628 50.57% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,153,000 561,544 591,456 48.70% District Operating&Other Expenditures 211,500 67.970 143,530 32.14% I� Total Outlays 4,125,500 1,636,541 2,488,959 39.67% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance j 7M198 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31198 bl Construction in Progress 2,053,393 507,487 - 2,560,880 1 L Share of Joint Works 5,114,989 422,168 - 5,537.157 Sub-Total 7,168,382 929,655 - 8,098,037 1 V COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 8 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - Collecdon Lines and Pump Stns. 25,602,567 - - 25,602,567 LI Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6,747 - - 6,747 Li Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 22,639,161 550.282 - 23,189,443 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - - Sub-Total 48,248,475 550,282 - 48,798,757 y Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 55,416,857 1,479,937 - 56.896,794 V W Section 4-Page 10 L Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 Percent of r Actual Budget Remaining Actual 1996A9 Through Through 1998-99 Through increase Budget 1213198 12/31198 Budget 1213197 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves' 2,609,160 2,059,473 2,494,793 (435,320) r Revenues 2. In•Liau Premiums - - - - - - r 3. beerestBurstellaneous 135.000 67.392 49.92% 67,6W 56.483 10,909 4. Reimbursements from Other Funds 160,000 283.258 177.04% (123.258) 209,726 73,632 5. Total Revenues 295,000 350,650 118.88% (SS,BW) 268,219 84,441 r Expenses r 6. Salaries,Wages and Benefit 4,500 - 4.500 - - 7. Benefits/Claims 130,000 329,973 253.83% (199,973) 241,955 88,018 .+ S. Contractual Services 5,000 1A94 27.88% 3,606 4,262 (2,968) 9. Legal Sernoes 300,000 218,574 72.86% 81,426 172,532 48,042 �r 10. Professional Services 5,000 1,068 21.35% 3.932 - 1,068 11. Supplies&Omer Soo - 500 - r 12. Sub-Total Expenses 445,000 551,009 375.92% (106,009) 418,749 1322SO 13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 55.746 46.4e% 64254 60,936 (5,190) 14. Total Expenses 565,000 806,755 107.38% (41,755) 479,885 127,070 r 15. Excess Funniness(Expenses) (270,000) (266,105) 94.85% (13,895) (213,476) (42.629) 18. Ending Reserves` 2,339,180 1,803,366 77.09% 535,792 2281,317 (477,949) .r •Includes$687,300 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. r Section 5-Page 1 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1998 �•I percerd Actual of Budget Remaining Aural L 1996-99 Through Through 1998-99 Through Increase Budget 17/31/98 17/31199 Budget 1201197 (Decrease) i U 1. Beginning Reserves* 659,609 563,272 685,621 (102,349) Revenues y 2. In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 109.500 48.67% 115,500 107.180 2,320 3. Interest 8 Miscellaneous 35.000 17,603 50.29% 17,397 14,306 3,297 �+ 4. Total Revenues 260,000 127,103 48.89% 132,897 121,486 5,617 U Expenses Y 5. Salaries, Wages and Benefits - - - - - - 6. BenefnslClaims 250,000 106,571 42.63% 143,429 90,977 15,594 V1 7. Contractual Services 25.000 - 25,0W 12,500 (12,530) 8. Legal Services 5,000 9,671 193.42% (4,671) - 9,671 �+ 9. Professional Services 30,000 - 30,000 - - 10. Supplies 8 Other - - - - 583 (583) 11. Sub-Total Expenses 310,000 116,242 37.50% 193,758 104.060 12,182 12, Excess Loss Policy 25,000 10,860 43.44% 14,140 10,554 306 � 13. Total Expenses 335.000 127,102 37.94% 207,898 114,614 14488 L I Id 14. Excess Revenue (Expenses) (75,000) 1 - (75,001) 6,872 (6,871) L.I L 15. Ending Reserves' 584,609 563,273 96.35% (75,001) 672,493 (109,220) Ir Includes $139,231 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. it Section 5-Page 2 L Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE r General Management Administration(Division 110) Paulo mtance Objective 1998-09 Performance Target Through Mid-fear Summary of Data Ensure treatment cost does $486/MG $449/MG Costs below Gallonage charge due to lower not exceed target by end of than anticipated expenditures through mid- - fiscal year year. Ensure District meets 521.5 FTEs by 515.25 FTEs Target currently met ,r adopted five year staffing end of fiscal year plan Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. r with Permit Compliance Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 26.4% Expenditures well under target through mid- CORF Budget by end of year. See Engineering Section. year Ensure District Performance 80% 85%Performance Performance objectives have been met for the Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives(in 2nd qtr) 2nd quarter. Workplan milestone tasks ere milestones met within Objectives 72%Workplan slightly behind, largely due to unanticipated targets 80%Workplan Milestones(through Y2K efforts. Note that with GM approval, Milestones mid-year) some scheduled workplan tasks can be — delayed to a subsequent quarter given appropriate justfica6on. DiWcts-Wlda Not r Workplan Tasks Complete BN1ind Started Summary of Daft Through Mid-Year 186 134 34 8 72%of workplan tasks that were scheduled (and not delayed with GM approval)were completed. NOTE: The General Manager approved some 1"Quarter Workplan tasks for delay. These do not appear in the above table. Approval requires staff to specify valid reasons for project delay to a subsequent quarter. .d r r r Section 6-Page 1 1998-99 Mid-Year Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Administration (Division 210) Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance j Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data �J Average Annualized Rate 6% 6A4% The portfolios(long/short tens and cash flow of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective ILI' benchmarks. Figures based on current yield calculations. Average Interest Rate 4% 2.90% 1%is equivalent to approximately$1.7M annuaill L Paid on Certificate of in interest savings based on variable rate COPS Participation(COP) that are not protected by a long-term interest ran - Borrowing exchange agreement. I Ensure 100%of insurance LI programs renewed on Fees al/below 100%renewals met at Premium costs and brokerage fees were reduce schedule and FY'98 targets less than$90K from prior fiscal year. commissions/(ees NTE y $90,000 Remain at or under the net $45.2 Million by $20.2 million through 6 Expenses are being controlled well. Despite on Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal months(45%total) time costs recorded in the first quarter,we are o u year an 89%budget pace. 4 Workplan Tasks I Second quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data L 7 4 3 0 Implementation of various studies behind schedule due to unanticipated delays or additional focus on FIS implementation L completion. L L L L Ll LI I u Section 8-Page 2 1 L Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting (Division 220( Performance Objective 1998.99 Target Performance Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Issue monthly financial Due to end-of-year closings, July's reports within ithin 10 working 92% 83% distrib was s delayed. 5 of 6 months days have been delivered on-time. Develop FIS OneWond 90%trained by 15% Internal Accounting staff trained. Other r Training program year end staff training scheduled for 4th quarter. Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 90% Study to be completed early by 1199. study r r Worliplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behlnd Started Summary of Data - 3 2 1 0 Operational Review of Finance by consultants behind scheduled completion. • Section 6- Page 3 1998-99 Mid-Year Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing 8 Warehousing (Division 230) Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Summary of Data I Target Through Mid-Year 61 Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 98.11% 2nd Quarter cycle counting pregram met program Rating benchmark target. u Complete by Research Stage Project may be delayed due to a retirement JIT Inventory Contract 2/99 and re-assignment of staff to Y2K program. Plant 1 Sarcoding System Complete by Research Stage Products have been demonstrated and staff V 3199 is reviewing findings. Y2K program is impacting limey completion of this task. Implement Procurement Complete by PrepaLStageApplication with AMEX forwarded.Card Program 3/99Develop Quick Reference Complete by Project cunenlly on hold clue to Y2K Guide 3/98 program. u Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data RFP process for barcode system behind 4 3 1 0 schedule. 1 L IL Y L u L Section 6-Page 4 U Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications (Division 310) Performance Objective 1998.99 Performance Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Daft Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target met. Turnaround Time 100%of time r Board Minute Prepara0on 10 day 67% Minute's turnaround was delayed in Turnaround Time turnaround 100% September and December due to vacation. r of time Employee Satisfaction 3.0 scare N/A This survey will be conducted in the 3rd Rating (Communications quarter. r Audit) Photocopying Services 93%• 96% Benchmark target exceeded. Satisfaction Graphics Services 95%+ L00% Benchmark target exceeded. r Satisfaction Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%- 185 visitors have toured the plants during the Rating 2nd quarter. r Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter complete Behind Sttrted Summary of Daft — 4 3 1 0 Documentation of Webmaster policy and procedures behind schedule. r r r r Section 6 - Page 5 1998-99 Mid-Year Report u GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (Divisions 41 0/42 014 3 0') Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance I Through Mid-Year Summary of Data 64 Establish Cooperative 100%by year-end Implementation Stage Basic parameters and review committee Projects Program established. Proposals due 129. Ld Ensure Department budget 95-A-100% 93.6%(annualized) Target currently met. Expenditures tracking managed to within 95%- below target. I 100%of approved funding V Ensure Department 90% Pending Will be fully reported in 4111 quarter. achieves 90%+of budget performance objectives u Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 92% Target met. Pump Stations meets or exceeds target L Ensure that collections 90%+spots 89% Trouble spot performance slightly missed due V trouble spots are cleaned on to holiday schedule and personnel leave. maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 78% Target met. Fleet Maintenance Division u meets or exceeds target Ensure planned/preventive 75% Planned& 71% Preventive Approaches targeted benchmarks. maintenance to corrective Preventive 29%Corective maintenance ratios meets Maintenance targets 25%Corective Maintenance Workplan Tasks Not L Second Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Dale 6 4 2 0 Lack of clenral assistance delayed completion L of standardized reporting tools for weld/re- build shop and contractor performance indicators. *Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined this L quarter for reporting purposes. L L L L Section 6- Page 6 f W Performance Objectives HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (Divisions 5101520•) Performance Objective 199899 Performance ,r Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Percentage of supervisor 20.5%by year's 24% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains salaries to total does not end below private sector average but does not ` exceed 20.5% yet achieve benchmark. (private sector=25%) - HR Department managed 9D-100%of 28% expended through This is trending well below end-of-year within budget budget 6 months. target largely due to training budget encumbered but not debited. ,r Achieve 5-year staffing plan 521.5 FTE's by 515.25 FFE's through This is below our end-of-year target. projectors year's end quarter Ensure Department 90% WA Complete data will be fully reported in 4th — achieves 90%+of budget quarter. performance objectives *Ensure staff receive all 95% by year's 98%through 2nd Target should continue to be met through ` mandatory training and quarter the conclusion of 4th quarter. Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter comp/e0e BMhtd1 ffiarla�d Summary of Data 3 3 0 0 Wori#m tasks completed. *Note that Human ResaaCes and Training Divisions have been combined for this quarter's reporting purposes. r Section 6- Page 7 1998-99 Mid-Year Report u HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Safety & Emergency Response (Division 530) Performance Objective 1998-99 Perfomurnce Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data W Resolve Service Requests 90% of time 98% Customer Service remains a division within 2 work days priority. This also represents a significant improvement over last two years'objectives of a 75%15 day turnaround and 90%f3day turnaround, respectively. W Ensure Injury Incidences 7.6 incidence 4.5 The objective is well below industry 45%below industry rate standards. average Lost Work Day Case 3.8 incidence 1.9 Target has been met and is significantly Incidence Rate 50% below rate lower than established benchmark. industry average Lr Workers Compensation $403 S52 Costs were negligible the first half of the Cost Factor 30% below fiscal year due to negligible medical costs industry average for those few injuries occurring. L Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 5 5 0 0 Workplan tasks mrnpleted. L 1 ! L L L L LL L L LL Section 6-Pap 8 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620) Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance r Through Mid- Summary of Data Year Conduct all Core ocean 100%of time 100% Target met. monitoring sampling within NPDES parameters Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100% Deadlines 100% All regulatory deadlines met. and complete associated reports r Distribute high priority 80%Within 7 day 100% Target met. legislation Information to turnaround appropriate staff with 7 working days r Ensure 100%spill Incidents 100%within 5 days 100% Target met. reported within 5 working days. r r Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind St~ Summary of Date �+ 1 1 0 0 WorkPlan tasks oompleted. r r r r r r Section 6-Page 9 r 1998-99 Mid-Year Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Sciences Laboratory(Division 630) L Performance Objective 1998A9 Performance Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data �I Maintain monthly sample Within 10% of <10% Target met. analyses within"productive multi-agency range benchmark v Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 97%on 1st analysis Target met. on laboratory samples 1st amaysts; 100-A on 2nd Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of November—88% Internal standards established in November, i analyses established December—82% '98. Turnaround times approaching targeted u norm parameters. Y Wo"W Taslm Not I Second puarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data V 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Y li V LI I� 4 � i bl V 1 � V Section 6-Page 10 L Performance Objectives .. TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control (Division 640) „y Performance Objective 1998-N Performance Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Maintain field inspection 2.5 mondonng 2.6 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, r productivity events/day however, that due to data collection methods data is for 1st quarter of FY 98/99. Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. actions within 30 days of non-compliance event .. Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prior to expiration FRevise and develop'ocal Complete 100% Project on-going 100%of scheduled tasks to-date are limits for pollutants of of project by end complete. con con of year Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 1 1 0 Behind schedule an field productivity testing. r r Section 6- Page 11 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L (Division 7101720') Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance L Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Manage Engineering CORF 8D%- 25.4% Due to unanticipated project delays and other L V Budget expended by issues related to internal reporting,finalizing year's end contracts,etc., less has been expended than anticipated. V Bid construction projects on 80%-of time 75% Three out of four projects bid on schedule. established Capital Improvement Program schedule Lit Meet design project 80%.of time 84% Target met. 2125 milestones either met or milestones officially moved due to increased project L smile. Meet 9004 of project Complete 1DD% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule, milestones for Strategic Plan project by 3W milestones have been met. L Respond to environmental 100%of time 10D% The District has responded to all inquiries correspondence within 30 within 30 days. working days V L Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 10 6 4 0 Behind schedule on project management training tasks and others largely due to unanticipated Y2K efforts. 'Note that Engineering Admn. and Planning 8 Design Division have been combined for this quarters reporting purposes. L I ICI L L L Section 6- Page 12 L Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Construction Management(Division 730) r Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Summary of Data Target Through Mid Year Target Change Order costs 5% 3.53% Change order Posts are ahvays based on a at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four original contract amount quarters. Target has been met. (industry standard=7.25%) - Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 80%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is aways based on a Occupancy in facilities days 20%-240 days mooing average of the preceding four within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target has been met. r days Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 2.62% Target has been met based on QC Inspections and average no inspections. r more 10%correctable deficiencies Conduct submittal reviews 80%of dme or 79% Near target. One contract had 46 within 20 days greater submittals that caused some delays. Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 t 1 0 Behind schedule on written submhtal policy and procedures. r Section 6 - Page 13 1998-99 Mid-Year Report 6. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L O&M Administration (Division 810) L Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data L Ensure Operations $312/million $297/million gallons Target met. treatment cost per million gallons treated treated gallons does not exceed target L Ensure Total Injury 12.2 5.01 Target met. Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) II more below industry average Ensure Frne ear staffing 2D9.25 FfEs b 211.25 FTEs Due to dela I y g y ys in plant automation projects plan figures are met end of year (,142)this number may be revisited in the forthcoming 4-year staffing plan. However, we are close to target. L 11 Workplan Tasks Not V Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data N/A N/A N/A N/A - r L L L L I ' r L U L Section 6-Page 14 I 1 y Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Operations& Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 8201870) r Performance Objective 1998-99 Performance Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data r Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100%wahin Total contracts On target. blosolids and oxygen budget managed are at 43.9% contracts are managed of budget(87.8% .. within budget annualized) Ensure Capital Outlay 80%.of time -80% Project milestones met. Revolving Fund (CORF) project milestones are met Respond to trouble- 80%i 100% Target met, shooting and service requests by established priority time frames r Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.43 Target met. kilowatt hour($/kWh) 'Maintain therms/kWh at .111Merms/kWh .109therms/kWh-Plant Within targeted parameters. r Central Generation plants -Plant 1 1 (kilowatt hour)within .106 thermslkWh .108 therms/kWh-Plant targeted limits -Plant 2 2 r 'Maintain FERC efficiency 42%or greater 65% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit at Central Generation plants requirements thus gaining favorable natural within targeted limits gas transmission rates. r r Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 3 3 0 0 Workplan tasks complete. r 'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes. r r r Section 6-Page 15 1998-99 Mid-Year Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT t✓ O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 8301840) lw i Performance Objective 1998-99 Target Performance Through Mid- Summary of Data Year Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 77% Plant 1 Target met. Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 73%Plant 2 Process Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 54%Plant 1 Primary basin rehab project (BOD)Removal Targets in Primary and Plant 2 41%Plant 2 impacted P2 numbers although Treatment Process final effluent within norms. L Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25% (1 hour 6.75%Plant 1 Overtime much lower than total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 15%Plant 2 benchmark due to light training targets hours leave taken) schedule and transfer of Sr. L• Plant Operator to P1 night shift. Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.5%Plant 1 See above. u does not exceed targets salary 2.3%Plant 2 L Worlplan Tads Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data L 4 3 1 0 Elements of elective training program started but not completed. L L L L L L L L Section 6-Page 18 L Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860) Performance Objec#ve 1998-99 Target Performance Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Ensure 47.5%Wrench Time 47.5% 53% Target met. in Mechanical Maintenance r Division Ensure 47.5%Wrench Time 47.5% 44.5% Increased capital project commitments and in Electrical& DART implementation impacts wrench time Instrumentation Division completion. Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 66% r Time/Direct Support Time in Target met. Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 60%Wrench 6D% 60.5% Target met. Time/Direct Support Time in Electrical& Instrumentation Division Ensure preventive <100% 61% As maintenance tasks are rescheduled with maintenance back"in improved maintenance intervals, backlogs Mechanical Maintenance is will confine to fluctuate widely from quarter less than 1D0% to quarter. This program should be completed over the next year. r Ensure preventive <100% 116% See above. maintenance backlog in Electrical&Instrumentation is less than 100% r Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 5 1 0 Development of some procedures behind schedule. Section 6- Page 17 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L' OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L Air Quality & Special Projects(Division 880) Performance Objective 1998.99 Pedormanee Through U Target 8Rd-Year Summary of Data Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target. deadlines Complete approved 80%+projects 2 of 9 completed Target met. research projects including completed by 4 of 9 improgress L project planning,design and year's end 3 of 9 in planning field investigation L Workplan Tasks Not Second Quarter Complete Behind St~ Summary of Data L� 13 8 2 3 Some projects delayed largely due to many I 1 factors external to the division, u L u L L L L U L L Section S-Page 18 L Performance Objectives INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT r (Divisions 920/930/940/950') Performance Objective 1998•99 Performance r Target Through Mid-Year Summary of Data Resolve all help desk calls 80%+within 5 78.1% Approaches benchmark target. r days Ensure limited radio-system Less than .5% 0.12% Target met. outages r Meet Capital Outlay 85%+Div 930 100% Target met. Revolving Fund(CORF) 75%+Div 940 76% project milestones by due date Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 99.31% Target met. 'Up-time r Maintain Database'Up. 95%+ 99.2% Target met. 0me Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100% Target met. -Up-time' plants Workplan Tasks Not r Second Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data 8 3 4 1 Y2K project has significantly impacted r progress on various other activities. 'Note that Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes. r r r r Section 6-Page 19 1998-99 Mid-Year Report L u li u L L L L L u This Page Left Intentionally Blank Ir I ' u L L L L L L u Section 6- Page 20 y Orange County Sanitation District (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 2/I/99